TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table Of Contentsof contents Introduction Unless otherwise specified, all references in this annual report to: “we,” “us,” “our” or “CSN” are to Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional and its consolidated subsidiaries; “Brazilian government” are to the federal government of the Federative Republic of Brazil; “real,” “reais” or “R$” are to Brazilianreais, the official currency of Brazil; “U.S. dollars,” “$,” “US$“U.S.$” or “USD” are to United States dollars; “billions” are to thousands of millions, “km” are to kilometers, “m” are to meters, “mt” or “tons” are to metric tons, “mtpy” are to metric tons per year and “MW” are to megawatts; “TEUs” are to twenty-foot equivalent units; “consolidated financial statements” are to the consolidated financial statements of Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional and its consolidated subsidiaries reported in International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the IASB – IFRS as of December 31, 20112013, 2014 and 20122015 and for the years ended December 31, 2010, 20112013 and 2012,2014 and 2015 together with the corresponding Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm; “ADSs” are to CSN’s American Depositary Shares and “ADRs” are to CSN’s American Depositary Receipts; and “Brazil” is to the Federative Republic of Brazil.
Table Of Contents
Forward-Looking Statements This annual report includes forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 27A of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, principally under the captions “Item 3. Key Information,” “Item 4. Information on the Company,” “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.” We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events, industry and financial trends affecting our business. Many important factors, in addition to those discussed elsewhere in this annual report, could cause our actual results to differ substantially from those anticipated in our forward-looking statements, including, among other things: · general economic, political and business conditions in Brazil and abroad, especially in China, which is the largest world steel producer;producerand main consumer of our iron ore; ·demand for and prices of steel and mining products; · the ongoing effects of the global financial markets and economic slowdown;slowdowns; · changes in competitive conditions and in the general level of demand and supply for our products; · our liquidity position and leverage; ·management’s expectations and estimates concerning our future financial performance and financing plans; · our level of debt;debt and our ability to obtain financing on satisfactory terms; · availability and price of raw materials; · changes in international trade or international trade regulations; · protectionist measures imposed by Brazil and other countries; · our capital expenditure plans;
Table of contents · inflation, interest rate levels and fluctuations in foreign exchange rates; · our ability to develop and deliver our products on a timely basis; · lack of infrastructure in Brazil; · electricity and natural gas shortages and government responses to them; · existing and future governmental regulation; and · other risk factors as set forth under “Item 3D. Risk Factors.” The words “believe,” “may,” “will,” “aim,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “plan,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “expect” and similar words are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they were made, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or to revise any forward-looking statements after we distribute this annual report because of new information, future events or other factors. In light of the risks and uncertainties described above, the forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this annual report might not occur and are not an indication of future performance. As a result of various factors, such as those risks described in “Item 3D. Risk Factors,” undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements.
Table Of Contents
Presentation of Financial and Other Information Our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 20122015 and 20112014 and for the years ended December 31, 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 20102013 contained in “Item 18. Financial Statements” have been presented in thousands ofreais (R$) and prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). See Note 2(a) to our consolidated financial statements. Certain figures included in this annual report have been subject to rounding adjustments. Accordingly, figures shown as totals in certain tables may not be an arithmetic aggregation of the figures, which precede them. PART I Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors Not applicable. Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable Not applicable. Item 3. Key Information 3A. Selected Financial Data We present in this section the summary financial and operating data derived from our audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012 2011, 2010 and 2009.2011. The consolidated financial statements included in this annual report have been prepared in accordance with IFRS, as issued by the IASB, presented in Brazilianreaisreal. However, we have translated some of the Brazilianreal amounts contained in this annual report into U.S. dollars.dollars for the convenience of readers outside of Brazil. The rate used to translate such amounts in respect of the year ended December 31, 20122015 was R$2.04353.905 to US$U.S.$1.00, which was the commercial rate for the purchase of U.S. dollars in effect as of December 31, 2012,2015, as reported by the Central Bank of Brazil, or the Central Bank. The U.S. dollar equivalent information presented in this annual report is provided solely for the convenience of investors and should not be construed as implying that the Brazilianreal amounts represent, or could have been or could be converted into, U.S. dollars at such rates or at any other rate. See “Exchange Rates” for more detailed information regarding the translation ofreais into U.S. dollars.
Table of contents IFRS Summary Financial and FinancialOperating Data
The following tables present summary historical consolidated financial and operating data for us for each of the periods indicated. Solely for the convenience of the reader, Brazilian real amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 20122015 have been translated into U.S. dollars at the commercial market rate in effect as of December 31, 20122015 as reported by the Central Bank of R$2.04353.905 to US$U.S.$1.00. The selected financial data below should be read in conjunction with “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.” We have applied, beginning January 1, 2013, IFRS 10 - Consolidated Financial Statements, which establishes principles for the presentation and preparation of consolidated financial statements when an entity controls one or more entities, and IFRS 11 - Joint Arrangements, which requires a new valuation of joint arrangements, focusing on the rights and obligations of the arrangement, instead of its legal form. The reffered new standard provides additional transition relief, limiting the requirement to provide adjusted comparative information to only the preceding comparative period. We applied this transition relief as described above with respect to the adoption of IFRS 10 and IFRS 11. The financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012 have been restated for the effects of the retrospective adoption of these new standards. Our financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011 remain unchanged and as disclosed previously. The selected financial data for the year ended December 31, 2011 have not been retrospectively adjusted and, as a result, are not comparable with the information as of and for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2012. | | Year Ended December 31, | Income Statement Data: | | 2012 | | 2012 | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 | | | (in million of US$, except per share data) | | (in million of R$, except per share data) | Net operating revenues | | 8,268 | | 16,896 | 16,520 | | 14,451 | | 10,978 | Cost of products sold | | (5,908) | | (12,072) | (9,801) | | (7,883) | | (7,211) | Gross Profit | | 2,361 | | 4,824 | 6,719 | | 6,568 | | 3,768 | Operating expenses | | | | | | | | | | Selling | | (456) | | (932) | (604) | | (482) | | (447) | General and Administrative | | (282) | | (577) | (576) | | (537) | | (480) | Share of profit (losses) of investees | | | | (1) | | | | | | Other Expenses | | (1,331) | | (2,719) | (501) | | (599) | | (648) | Other Income | | 23 | | 47 | 719 | | 49 | | 1,369 | Total | | (2,047) | | (4,182) | (962) | | (1,569) | | (206) | Operating income | | 314 | | 642 | 5,757 | | 4,998 | | 3,561 | | | | | | | | | | | Financial Income (expenses), net | | (975) | | (1,992) | (2,006) | | (1,911) | | (246) | Income (loss) Before Taxes | | (661) | | (1,351) | 3,751 | | 3,087 | | 3,315 | Income Tax | | | | | | | | | | Current | | (100) | | (205) | (136) | | (363) | | (577) | Deferred | | 526 | | 1,075 | 52 | | (207) | | (123) | | | | | | | | | | | Total | | (235) | | (481) | 3,667 | | 2,516 | | 2,615 | | | | | | | | | | | Net income (loss) | | (235) | | (481) | 3,667 | | 2,516 | | 2,615 | | | | | | | | | | | Loss attributable to noncontrolling interest | | (29) | | (60) | (39) | | - | | (4) | | | | | | | | | | | Net income (loss) attributable to Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional | | (206) | | (420) | 3,706 | | 2,516 | | 2,619 | | | | | | | | | | | Basic earnings per common share | | (0.14101) | | (0.28815) | 2.54191 | | 1.72594 | | 1.75478 | Diluted earnings per common share | | (0.14101) | | (0.28815) | 2.54191 | | 1.72594 | | 1.75478 | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended December 31, | Income Statement Data: | 2015 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 | | 2011 | | (in million of US$, except per share data) | | | | (in million of R$, except per share data) | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net operating revenues | 3,926 | | 15,332 | | 16,126 | | 17,312 | | 15,229 | | 16,520 | Cost of products sold | (3,022) | | 11,800 | | (11,592) | | (12,423) | | (11,259) | | (9,801) | Gross profit | 904 | | 3,532 | | 4,534 | | 4,889 | | 3,970 | | 6,719 | Operating expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | Selling | (368) | | (1,436) | | (1,042) | | (875) | | (774) | | (604) | General and Administrative | (121) | | (471) | | (438) | | (486) | | (468) | | (576) | Equity in results of affiliated companies | 297 | | 1,160 | | 331 | | 158 | | 642 | | 0 | Other expenses | (342) | | (1,334) | | (657) | | (1,134) | | (2,763) | | (501) | Other income4 | 954 | | 3,727 | | 90 | | 567 | | 111 | | 791 | Total4 | 422 | | 1,646 | | (1,716) | | (1,770) | | (3,252) | | (962) | | | | | | | | | | | | | Operating income | 1,326 | | 5,178 | | 2,818 | | 3,120 | | 719 | | 5,757 | Non-operating income (expenses), net | | | | | | | | | | | | Financial income | 125 | | 489 | | 172 | | 171 | | 391 | | 717 | Financial expenses | (989) | | (3,862) | | (3,253) | | (2,683) | | (2,543) | | (2,723) | | | | | | | | | | | | | Income before taxes | 462 | | 1,805 | | (263) | | 608 | | (1,433) | | 3,751 | Income tax | | | | | | | | | | | | Current | (98) | | (381) | | (528) | | (1,291) | | (322) | | (136) | Deferred | 49 | | 192 | | 679 | | 1,217 | | 1,275 | | 52 | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net (Loss) income | 414 | | 1,616 | | (112) | | 534 | | (481) | | 3,667 | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net loss attributable to non controlling interest | 92 | | 358 | | (7) | | 25 | | (61) | | (39) | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net income attributable to Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional | 322 | | 1,258 | | (105) | | 509 | | (421) | | 3,706 | | | | | | | | | | | | | Basic earnings common share | 0.23737 | | 0.92690 | | -0.07440 | | 0.34913 | | -0.28815 | | 2.54191 | Diluted earnings per common share | 0.23737 | | 0.92690 | | -0.07440 | | 0.34913 | | -0.28815 | | 2.54191 |
Table Of Contents | | As of December 31, | Balance Sheet Data: | | 2012 | | 2012 | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 | | | (in million of US$) | | (in million of R$) | Current assets | | 10,336 | | 21,122 | 21,945 | | 15,794 | | 12,835 | Investments | | 1,151 | | 2,352 | 2,088 | | 2,104 | | 322 | Property, plant and equipment | | 9,987 | | 20,409 | 17,377 | | 13,777 | | 11,133 | Other assets | | 2,648 | | 5,412 | 5,460 | | 6,380 | | 6,436 | | | | | | | | | | | Total assets | | 24,123 | | 49,295 | 46,870 | | 38,055 | | 30,726 | | | | | | | | | | | Current liabilities | | 3,136 | | 6,408 | 6,497 | | 4,456 | | 3,998 | Non-current liabilities | | 16,579 | | 33,880 | 31,956 | | 25,776 | | 20,139 | Shareholders’ equity | | 4,408 | | 9,007 | 8,417 | | 7,823 | | 6,589 | | | | | | | | | | | Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | | 24,123 | | 49,295 | 46,870 | | 38,055 | | 30,726 | | | | | | | | | | | Paid-in capital (in millions ofreais) | | 2,222 | | 4,540 | 1,681 | | 1,681 | | 1,681 | Common shares (in million) | | 1,457 | | 1,457 | 1,457 | | 1,457 | | 1,457 | Dividends declared and interest on shareholders’ equity¹ | | 147 | | 300 | 1,200 | | 1,856 | | 1,819 | Dividends declared and interest on shareholders’ equity per common share (inreais)¹ | | 0.10 | | 0.21 | 0.82 | | 1.27 | | 1.25 | | | | | | | | | | |
(1)
| Amounts consist of dividends declared and accrued interest on shareholders’ equity during the year. For a discussion of our dividend policy and dividend and interest payments made in 2012, see “Item 8A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information-Dividend Policy.”
|
Table Of Contentsof contents
Year Ended December 31, | Income Statement Data: | 2015 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013³ | | 2012 | 2011² | | (in million of US$) | | (in million of R$) | | | | | | | | | | | | Current assets | 4,208 | | 16,431 | | 15,936 | | 16,403 | | 19,099 | 21,945 | Investments | 1,024 | | 3,998 | | 13,665 | | 13,487 | | 10,840 | 2,088 | Property, plant and equipment4 | 4,577 | | 17,872 | | 15,624 | | 14,911 | | 18,520 | 17,377 | Other assets | 2,650 | | 10,349 | | 4,542 | | 5,602 | | 4,825 | 5,460 | | | | | | | | | | | | Total assets | 12,459 | | 48,650 | | 49,767 | | 50,403 | | 53,284 | 46,870 | | | | | | | | | | | | Current liabilities | 1,256 | | 4,903 | | 6,363 | | 5,564 | | 6,551 | 6,497 | Non-current liabilities | 8,966 | | 35,011 | | 37,669 | | 36,770 | | 37,725 | 31,956 | Stockholders' equity 4 | 2,237 | | 8,736 | | 5,735 | | 8,069 | | 9,008 | 8,417 | | | | | | | | | | | | Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | 12,459 | | 48,650 | | 49,767 | | 50,403 | | 53,284 | 46,870 | | | | | | | | | | | | Paid-in capital(in million of reais) | 1,163 | | 4,540 | | 4,540 | | 4,540 | | 4,540 | 1,681 | Common shares (in million of shares) | 1,388 | | 1,388 | | 1,388 | | 1,457 | | 1,457 | 1,457 | Dividends declared and interest on stockholders' equity(in million of reais)¹ | 70 | | 275 | | 700 | | 800 | | 300 | 1200 | Dividends declared and interest on stockholders' equity per common share (in million of reais)¹ | 0.05 | | 0.2 | | 0.5 | | 0.55 | | 0.21 | 0.82 |
Exchange Rates
(1) Amounts consist of dividends declared and accrued interest on shareholders’ equity during the year. For a discussion of our dividend policy and dividend and interest payments, see “Item 8A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information-Dividend Policy.” (2) The selected financial data as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011 have not been retrospectively adjusted for the effects of the adoption of IFRS 10 and 11 as permitted by the transition guidance related to these standards. (3) In 2013, the financial information was substantially impacted by the deconsolidation of Transordestina Logística S.A. which began to be recognized under the equity accounting method, due to the partial spin-off and the entry into effect of the new shareholders’agreement. For further information, see Other operating income (expenses) included in Item 5A. Operating Results. (4) The 2015 financial information was impacted by the business combination of Congonhjas Minérios as described in “Item 5A. Operating Results” The Brazilian foreign exchange system allows the purchase and sale of foreign currency and the international transfer ofreais by any person or legal entity, regardless of the amount, subject to certain regulatory procedures. The Brazilianreal has experienced frequent and substantial variations in relation to the U.S. dollar and other foreign currencies during the recent decades. Between 2000 and 2008, thereal fluctuated significantly against the U.S. dollar, reaching a peak of R$3.53 per US$1.00 at the end of 2002 and a low of R$1.56 per US$1.00 in August 2008. In the context of the crisis in the global financial markets after mid-2008, the real depreciated 31.9% against the U.S. dollar throughout 2008, reaching R$2.34 per US$1.00 on December 31, 2008. From 2009 to 2011, the real appreciated 19.7% against the U.S. dollar and reached R$1.88 per US$1.00 at year end 2011. In 2012, the real depreciated 17.6% and on December 31, 2012 the exchange rate was R$2.04 per US$1.00. On April 29, 2013 the exchange rate was R$2.00per US$1.00. The Central Bank has intervened occasionally to mitigate volatility in foreign exchange rates.
We cannot predict whether the Central Bank or the Brazilian government will continue to allow the Brasilianreal to float freely or will intervene in the exchange rate market through a currency band system or otherwise. The Brazilianreal may depreciate or appreciate against the U.S. dollar substantially. The following tables present the sellingpurchese rate, expressed inreais per U.S. dollar (R$/US$U.S.$), for the periods indicated.indicated: Year ended | | | | | | | | | Low | | High | | Average(1) | | Period-end | December 31, 2008 | | 1.559 | | 2.500 | | 1.837 | | 2.337 | | December 31, 2009 | | 1.702 | | 2.422 | | 1.994 | | 1.741 | | December 31, 2010 | | 1.655 | | 1.881 | | 1.759 | | 1.666 | | | | | | | | | | | December 31, 2011 | | 1.535 | | 1.902 | | 1.675 | | 1.876 | 1.535 | | 1.902 | | 1.675 | | 1.876 | December 31, 2012 | | 1.702 | | 2.112 | | 1.955 | | 2.044 | 1.702 | | 2.112 | | 1.955 | | 2.044 | December 31, 2013 | | 1.953 | | 2.446 | | 2.161 | | 2.343 | December 31, 2014 | | 2.560 | | 2.740 | | 2.639 | | 2.656 | December 31, 2015 | | 2.575 | | 4.195 | | 3.334 | | 3.905 | | | | | | | | | | | Month ended | | Low | | High | | Average | | Period-end | October 2015 | | 3.738 | | 4.001 | | 3.880 | | 3.859 | November 2015 | | 3.701 | | 3.851 | | 3.776 | | 3.851 | December 2015 | | 3.748 | | 3.983 | | 3.871 | | 3.905 | January 2016 | | 3.986 | | 4.156 | | 4.052 | | 4.043 | February 2016 | | 3.865 | | 4.049 | | 3.973 | | 3.979 | March 2016 | | 3.558 | | 3.991 | | 3.703 | | 3.558 | April 2016 | | 3.450 | | 3.692 | | 3.565 | | 3.450 | Source: Central Bank. | | | | | | | | | (1) Represents the daily average of the close exchange rates during the period | | (1) Represents the daily average of the close exchange rates during the period |
Month ended | | | | | | | | | October 2012 | | 2.022 | | 2.038 | | 2.030 | | 2.031 | November 2012 | | 2.031 | | 2.107 | | 2.068 | | 2.107 | December 2012 | | 2.044 | | 2.112 | | 2.078 | | 2.044 | January 2013 | | 1.988 | | 2.047 | | 2.031 | | 1.988 | February 2013 | | 1.957 | | 1.989 | | 1.973 | | 1.975 | March 2013 | | 1.953 | | 2.019 | | 1.983 | | 2.014 | April 2013 (through April 29, 2013) | | 1.974 | | 2.024 | | 2.002 | | 2.000 | Source: Central Bank. | (1)Represents the daily average of the close exchange rates during the period. | | | | | | | | | |
Table of contents We will pay any cash dividends and make any other cash distributions with respect to our common shares in Brazilian currency. Accordingly, exchange rate fluctuations may affect the U.S. dollar amounts received by ADS holders on conversion into U.S. dollars of such distributions for payment by the depositary. Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the Brazilianreal and the U.S. dollar may also affect the U.S. dollar equivalent of thereal price of our common shares on BM&FBOVESPA. 3B. Capitalization and Indebtedness Not applicable.required. 3C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds Not applicable.required.
Table Of Contents
3D. Risk Factors An investment in our ADSs or common shares involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below before making an investment decision. Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected by any of these risks. The trading price of our ADSs could decline due to any of these risks or other factors, and you may lose all or part of your investment. The risks described below are those that we currently believe may materially affect us. Risks Relating to Brazil The Brazilian government exercises significant influence over the Brazilian economy. This influence, as well as Brazilian political and economic conditions, could materially and adversely affect us. The Brazilian government frequently intervenes in the Brazilian economy and occasionally makes significant changes in policy and regulation. See “—Government efforts to combat inflation may hinder the growth of the Brazilian economy and could harm our business”us” and “Item 5A. Operating Results—Brazilian Macro-Economic Scenario, Effects of Exchange Rate Fluctuations.” The Brazilian government’s actions, policies and regulations have involved, among other measures, increases in interest rates, changes in tax policies, price controls, currency devaluations, capital controls and limits on imports. Our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by political, social, and economic developments in or affecting Brazil, and by changes in policy or regulations at the federal, state or municipal levels involving or affecting factors such as: · interest rates; · exchange controls; · currency fluctuations; · inflation; · price volatility of raw materials and our final products; · lack of infrastructure in Brazil; · energy and water supply shortages and rationing programs; · liquidity of the domestic capital and lending markets; · regulatory policy for the mining, steel, cement, logistic and steelenergy industries; · environmental policies and regulations;
Table of contents · tax policies and regulations;regulations, including frequent changes in tax regulations that may result in uncertainties as to future taxation; and · other political, social and economic developments in or affecting Brazil. Uncertainty over whetherRecent economic and political instability, which have become more acute at the end of 2015, may lead to legislative or regulatory changes that could negatively affect us. In addition, such changes may also lead to further economic uncertainty and to heightened volatility and negative perception of the Brazilian government will make changes affecting these and other factorssecurities markets which may create instability. This may also adversely affect us and the trading price of our business,common shares.
Political crises, corruption scandals and deadlock in Brazil have in the past affected and are currently affecting the development of the Brazilian economy and the trust of foreign investors, as well as the public in general. Recent popular unrest has led to large demonstrations in the past three years, with the Brazilian populace expressing growing dissatisfaction with the country’s deteriorating political climate, corruption, mounting inflation, slow GDP growth and high interest rates. In addition and as a consequence to the above mentioned, since 2011, Brazil has experienced an economic slowdown. The Gross Domestic Product, or GDP, growth rates were a negative 3.8% in 2015, 0.1% in 2014, 2.7% in 2013, 1.8% in 2012 and 3.9% in 2011, compared to a GDP growth of 7.5% in 2010. In 2016, analysts project that the Brazilian GDP will contract 3.9%, according to a Focus Report published by the Brazilian Central Bank on April 29, 2016. Our results of operations and financial condition have been, and resultswill continue to be, affected by the growth rate of operations.the Brazilian GDP. We cannot assure you that the GDP will increase or remain stable. Developments in the Brazilian economy may affect Brazil’s growth rates and, consequently, the use of our products and services. Exchange rate instability may adversely affect us and the market price of our common shares and ADSs. The Brazilian currency has long experienced frequent and substantial variations in relation to the U.S. dollar and other foreign currencies. For example, thereal was R$1.56 per US$1.00 in August 2008. In the context of the crisis in the global financial markets after mid-2008, thereal depreciated 31.9%appreciated 11.8%, 8.7% and 17.2% against the U.S. dollar in 2005, 2006 and reached R$2.34 per US$1.00 at December 31, 2008. Since then,2007, respectively. In 2008, as a result of the worsening global economic crisis, the real appreciateddepreciated 32% against the U.S. dollar, closing at R$2.337 to U.S.$1.00 on December 31, 2008. For the years of 2009 and reached2010, amid robust GDP growth and a strong local economy the real appreciated 25.5% and 4.2%, respectively, against the U.S. dollar, closing at R$1.88 per US$1.741 and R$1.666 to U.S.$1.00 at year end 2011. In 2012,on December 31, 2009 and 2010, respectively. Since 2013, the real depreciated 17.6%against the U.S. dollar by 14.6% in 2013, 13.4% in 2014 and 47.0% in 2015, mainly due to external and internal factors, closing at R$2.343, R$2.656 and R$ 3.905 to U.S.$1.00 on December 31, 2012,2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. On April 29, 2016 the exchange rate was R$2.043.45 per US$U.S.$1.00. On April 29, 2013 the exchange rate was R$2.00 per US$1.00.
Table Of Contents
Depreciation of therealagainst major foreign currencies could create inflationary pressures in Brazil and contribute to Central Bank increases in interest rates, which could negatively affect us and the growth of the Brazilian economy, may curtail access to foreign financial markets and may prompt government intervention, which could include recessionary measures. Depreciation of therealcan also, as in the context of an economic slowdown, lead to decreased consumer spending deflationary pressures and reduced growth of the economy as a whole. On the other hand, appreciation of therealrelative to major foreign currencies could lead to a deterioration of Brazilian foreign exchange current accounts, as well as affect export-driven growth. Depending on the circumstances, either depreciation or appreciation of therealcould materially and adversely affect the growth of the Brazilian economy and us, as well as impact the U.S. dollar value of distributions and dividends on, and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the market price of, our common shares and our ADSs.
Table of contents In the event therealdepreciates in relation to the U.S. dollar, the cost inreaisof our foreign currency-denominated borrowings and imports of raw materials, particularly coal and coke, will increase. On the other hand, if therealappreciates in relation to the U.S. dollar, it will causereal-denominated production costs to increase as a percentage of total production costs and cause our exports to be less competitive. competitive.We had total U.S. dollar-denominated or -linked indebtedness of R$10,82918,384 million or 35.76%53% of our total indebtedness, as of December 31, 2012. 2015. Because of thereal depreciation, the U.S. dollar-denominated debt increased by R$4,227 million compared to December 31, 2014. Government efforts to combat inflation may hinder the growth of the Brazilian economy and could harm us. Brazil has in the past experienced extremely high rates of inflation, which has led the government to pursue monetary policies that have contributed to one of the highest real interest rates in the world. Since the implementation of theRealPlan in 1994, the annual rate of inflation in Brazil has decreased significantly, as measured by the National Broad Consumer Price Index (Índice Nacional de Preços ao Consumidor Amplo, or IPCA). Since 2014, and especially during the year of 2015, Brazil has again experienced high rates of inflation, and the tendency is a continuing high level of inflation for 2016. Inflation measured by the IPCA index was 5.9%, 6.5%6.4% and 5.8%10.7% in 2010, 20112013, 2014 and 2012,2015, respectively. Inflation and the Brazilian government’s inflation containment measures, mainly through monetary policies, have had and may have significant effects on the Brazilian economy and our business. Tight monetary policies with high interest rates may restrict Brazil’s growth and the availability of credit. Conversely, more lenient policies and interest rate decreases may trigger increases in inflation, with the consequent reaction of sudden and significant interest rate increases, which could negatively affect Brazilian economic growth and us. In addition, we may not be able to adjust the price of our products in the foreign markets to offset the effects of inflation in Brazil on our cost structure, given that most of our costs are incurred inreais. The Brazilian government has introduced policies aimed at reducing inflationary pressures, which could have the effect of reducing the overall performance of the Brazilian economy. Developments and perception of risk in other countries, especially in the United States, China and other emerging market countries, may adversely affect the trading price of Brazilian securities, including our common shares and ADSs. The market value of securities of Brazilian companies is affected to varying degrees by economic and market conditions in other countries, including the United States, China, Latin American andespecially other emerging market countries. Although economic conditions in these countries may differ significantly from economic conditions in Brazil, investors’ reactions to developments in these other countries may have an adverse effect on the market value of securities of Brazilian issuers. Crisis in, or economic policies of, other countries may diminish investorinvestors' interest in securities of Brazilian issuers, including ours. This could adversely affect the trading price of our common shares and/or ADSs, and could also make it more difficult or impossible for us to access the capital markets and finance our operations on acceptable terms. Risks Relating to Us and the Industries in Which We Operate We are exposed to substantial changes in the demand for steel and iron ore, which has a substantial impact in the prices of our products and may adversely affect our results of operations. The steel and mining industries are highly cyclical, both in Brazil and abroad. The demand for steel and mining products and, thus, the financial condition and results of operations of companies in the steel and mining industries, including us, are generally affected by macroeconomic fluctuations in the world economy and the economies of steel-producing countries, including trends in the automotive, construction, home appliances and packaging industries, as well as other industries which rely on steel distributors. A worldwide recession, an extendedperiod of below-trend growth in developed countries or a slowdown in the emerging markets that are large consumers of our products (such as the domestic Brazilian market for our steel products and the Chinese market for iron ore) could sharply reduce demand for our products. Reduced demand can lead to overcapacity and excessive downtime, lower utilization of our significant fixed assets and therefore reduced operating profitability. In addition, flat steel competes with other materials that may be used as substitutes, such as aluminum (particularly in the automobileautomotive and packaging industry), cement, composites, glass, plastic and wood. Government regulatory initiatives mandating the use of such materials in lieu of steel, whether for environmental or other reasons, as well as the development of other new substitutes for steel products, could also significantly reduce market prices and demand for steel products and thereby reduce our cashflow and profitability. Any material decrease in demand or increase in supply for steel and iron ore in the domestic or export markets served by us could have a material adverse effect on us.
Table Of Contents
Table of contents Prices charged for iron ore are subject to volatility. International iron ore prices have been decreasing significantly and may have a negative impact on our revenues, cash flow, profitability, as well as result in a need to change the way we operate or in the suspension of certain of our projects and operations. Our iron ore prices are based on a variety of pricing terms, which generally use market price indices as a basis for determining the customer price. Our prices and revenues for iron ore are consequentlyvolatile, which may adversely affect our results of operations and cash flow. In 2015, average iron ore prices decreased 28.5% to US$ 55.5/dmt, from US$96.7/dmt in 2014. In 2014, average iron ore prices decreased 42.6% to US$96.7/dmt from US$135.2/dmt in 2013, according to the average Platts IODEX (62% Fe CFR China). On April 29th 2016, the index stood at US$65.85/dmt. As a result, revenues from our mining business decreased from 31% in 2013 to 23% in 2014 and 19% in 2015 of our total net revenues. A continuous decrease in the market prices for iron ore may result in a need to change the way we operate or, depending on the level of price decreases, even in the suspension of certain of our projects and operations and impairment of assets, which could adversely affect our financial position and results of operations. Adverse economic conditions in China and an increase in global iron ore production capacity could have a negative impact on our revenues, cash flow and profitability. China has been the main driver of global demand for minerals and metals over the last past years, effectively driving global prices for iron ore and steel. In 2015, China accounted for 70% of the global seaborne iron ore trade. The percentage of our iron ore sales volume consumed in China was 60% in 2015. China is also the largest world steel producer, accounting for approximately 50% of the global steel production. A contraction of China’s economic growth could result in lower global demand for iron ore and steel and increase the global steel industry over-capacity, leading to lower revenues, cash flow and profitability. Poor performance in the Chinese real estate sector and low investments in infrastructure, two of the largest markets for carbon steel in China, could also negatively impact our results. The China GDP increased 6.9% in 2015 compared to 7.3% in 2014, 7.7% in 2013 and 7.7% in 2012. In addition, the recent strategy of the major iron ore suppliers to maintain their production targets and planned capacity increases could have a material adverse effect on us and adversely affect our results of operations. We may not be able to adjust our mining production volume in a timely or cost-efficient manner in response to changes in demand. Revenues from our mining business represented 31%, 25% and 19% of our total net revenues in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. Operating at significant idle capacity during periods of weak demand may expose us to higher unit production costs since a significant portion of our cost structure is fixed in the short-term due to the high capital intensity of mining operations. In addition, efforts to reduce costs during periods of weak demand could be limited by labor regulations or existing labor or government agreements. Conversely, our ability to rapidly increase production capacity is limited, which could render us unable to fully satisfy demand for our iron ore. When demand exceeds our production capacity, we may meet excess customer demand by purchasing iron ore from unrelated parties and reselling it, which would increase our costs and narrow our operating margins. If we are unable to satisfy excess customer demand in this way, we may lose customers. In addition, operating close to full capacity may expose us to higher costs, including demurrage fees due to capacity restraints in our logistics systems. The availability and the price of raw materials that we need to produce steel, particularly coal and coke, may adversely affect our results of operations. In 2012 and 2011,2015, raw material costs accounted for 51.2% and 53.9%, respectively,51.3% of our total steel production costs. Our main raw materials include iron ore, coal, coke, limestone, dolomite, manganese, zinc, tin and aluminum. We depend on third parties for some of our raw material requirements, including importing all of the coal required to produce coke and approximately 33%58.4% of our coke requirements. In addition, we require significantrequiresignificant amounts of energy, in the form of natural gas and electricity, to power our plants and equipment.
Table of contents Any prolonged interruption in the supply of raw materials, natural gas, or electricity, or substantial increases in their prices, could materially and adversely affect us. These interruptions and price increases may be a result of changes in laws or trade regulations, the availability and cost of transportation, suppliers’ allocations to other purchasers, interruptions in production by suppliers and/or accidents or similar events on suppliers’ premises or along the supply chain. Our inability to pass those cost increases on to our customers or to meet our customers’ demands because of non-availability of key raw materials could also have a material and adverse effect on us. Our steel products face significant competition, including price competition, from other domestic or foreign producers, which may adversely affect our profitability and market share. The global steel industry is highly competitive with respect to price, product quality and customer service, as well as technological advances that enable steel companies to reduce their production costs. Brazil’s export of steel products is influenced by several factors, including the protectionist policies of other countries, especially those of the United States, disputes regarding these policies before the WTO (World Trade Organization), the Brazilian government’s exchange rate policy and the growth rate of the world economy. Further, continuous advances in materials sciences and resulting technologies have given rise to improvements in products such as plastics, aluminum, ceramics and glass that permit them to substitute steel. Due to high start-up costs, the economics of operating a steelworks facility on a continuous basis may encourage mill operators to maintain high levels of output, even in times of low demand, which increases the pressure on industry profit margins. In addition, downward pressure on steel prices by our competitors may affect our profitability. The steel industry has historically suffered from structural over-capacity which has recently worsened due to a substantial increase in production capacity in the developing world and particularly in China and India, as well as other emerging markets. China is now, by far, the largest global steel producer by a large margin and, in addition, Chinese and other countries’certain steel exports, orexporting countries have favorable conditions favorable to them (excess steel capacity, undervalued currency or higher market prices for steel in markets outside of such countries), which can have a significant impact on steel prices in other markets. If we are not able to remain competitive in relation to China or other steel-producing countries, our results may be adversely affected in the future.affected. InSince 2010, steel companies in Brazil have faced strong competition from imported products, mainly as a result of the global excess in steel production, reduction in demand for steel products in mature markets, the exchange rate appreciation and tax incentives. Theincentives in some of the main exporting countries. Despite Brazilian government adopted measuresimport duties to contain importedprotect domestic producers, a substantial volume of steel products is still being imported. If the Brazilian Government does not act against subsidizedsteel imports and as a result, pricesthere is an increase in imports, our results of imported products stabilized as compared to local products. These measures had a positive effect in 2011, when imports were consistently reduced. In 2012, imports remained in line with the number recorded in 2011.operations may be materially and adversely affected. Apart from direct steel imports, the Brazilian industry has also been facing competition from imported finished goods, which affects the whole steel chain. If the Brazilian Government were to remove the current protective measures or fail to act against cheap subsidized steel imports, our results of operation may also be materially and adversely affected.
Table Of Contents
The shift in iron ore pricing and increase in price volatility could adversely affect our iron ore business.
The previous annual benchmark price system for iron ore adopted by the main iron ore producers, including us, was replaced in the last couple of years by different pricing systems, and is now more sensitive to spot price volatility. Fluctuations in supply and demand could increase price volatility, mainly in spot prices, which could adversely affect our mining business and, consequently, our cash flow. See “Item 5A—Operating Results—Overview—Macro-Economic Scenario—Mining.”
Protectionist and other measures adopted by foreign governments could adversely affect our export sales. In response to the increased production and export of steel by many countries, anti-dumping and countervailing dutiesduty and safeguard measures were imposed in the late 1990s and early 2000s by foreign governments representing the main markets for our exports. In 2011, both2015, the anti-dumping duties imposed by Argentina and theU.S. authorities initiated anti-dumping and countervailing duties imposed by the United States were terminated, although such decision in the United States remains suspended due to appeals filedduty investigations on behalf of the U.S.hot-rolled and cold-rolled steel industry. We have also adapted to the restrictions imposed by the European Union on imports of certain chemical substances contained either in products used to protect the steel products or in products used to pack them.sheets and coils imported from Brazil and other countries. Restrictions imposed by Canada on imports of hot-rolled products from Brazil remain in effect. In addition, technical or safety measures, such as those imposed by the European Union on imports of certain chemical substances contained in products used to protect and/or pack steel products, may be adopted and as a result create barriers to steel exports. The imposition of these and other protectionist measures by foreign countries may materially and adversely affect our export sales. Our activities depend on authorizations, concessions, permits and licenses. Changes of laws and regulations and government measures could adversely affect us.
Table of contents Our activities depend onare subject to governmental authorizations, concessions, licenses or permits, andwhich include environmental licenses from,for our infrastructure projects and concessions, by, governmental regulatory agencies ofincluding for the countriesport terminals we operate and the railways in which we operate. Ifhave an equity interest. Although we believe that such authorizations, concessions, licenses and permits will be granted and/or renewed as and when requested, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to maintain, renew or obtain any required authorization, concession, license or permit, as well as that no additional requirement will be imposed in connection with such request. Authorizations, concessions, licenses or permits required for the development of our activities may require that we meet certain performance thresholds or completion milestones. In case we are unable to meet these thresholds or milestones, we may lose or not be able to obtain or renew such authorizations, concessions, licenses or permits. We also cannot guarantee that we or our controlled entities that hold concessions will timely comply with our/their obligations under any relevant Concession Agreement or in Terms of Undertaking (Termos de Ajustamento de Conduta), or TACs, entered into with governmental agencies. Any of these events may result in the loss or early termination of concessions, authorizations, permits and/or licenses, the restriction of access to public financing for the concession or the amortization of the public financing before a project begins to operate, as well as the imposition of penalties, such as fines or the closure of facilities. In addition, if laws and regulations applicable to these authorizations, concessions, permits or licenses change, modifications to our technologies and operations could be required, and we may need to make unexpected capital expenditures. Especially concerning our mining activities, new, more stringent environmental licensing requirements for our projects and operations could be imposed as a reaction by government to a major accident occurred in Brazil in 2015 involving the Fundão tailing dam of Samarco Mineração S.A. As a result, the amount and timing of future environmental and related expenditures may vary substantially from those currently anticipated and we may encounter delays in obtaining environmental or other operating licenses, or not be able to obtain and/or renew an authorization, permit and/or license. These changesevents and additional costs may have a negative impact on the profitability of our projects or even make certain projects economically or otherwise unfeasible. Also, we cannot guarantee that we will be ableSee “—Current, new or more stringent environmental, safety and health regulations imposed on us may result in increased liabilities and increased capital expenditures.” Our activities are also subject to maintain, renew or obtain any required authorization, concession, permit or license. Our authorizations, concessions, permitsgovernmental regulation in the form of taxes, charges and licenses may require that we meet certain performance thresholds or completion milestones. royalties, which can have an important financial impact on our operations.In casethe countries where we are unablepresent, governments may impose new taxes, raise existing taxes and royalty rates, reduce tax exemptions and benefits or change the basis on which taxes are calculated in a manner that is unfavorable to meet these thresholds or milestones we may loseus.The Brazilian Congress is currently reviewing a bill that proposes significant changes to the Mineral Code, including a potential increase of the royalties (CFEM) charged for our authorizations, concessions, permitsmining activities. See “Item 4B. Business Overview–Government Regulation and licenses. Other Legal Matters–Brazil – Mining Regulation –Mineral Rights and Ownership.” The loss or inability to obtain and/or renew any authorization, concession, permit or license, or changes in the regulatory framework that we operate in, may materially and adversely affect us. We have a level of indebtedness which could make it more difficult or expensive to refinance our maturing debt and /or incur new debt. As of December 31, 2015, our total debt outstanding amounted to R$34,283 million, consisting of R$1,875 million of short-term debt and R$32,408 million of long-term debt.See “Item 5B. Liquidity and Capital Resources” and “Item 18. Financial Statements.” We had R$7,861 million of cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2015. Our planned investments in all of our business segments will require a significant amount of cash over the course of 2016 and following years. See “Item 4D. Property, Plant and Equipment – Capital Expenditures – Planned Investments.” The level of our indebtedness could affect our credit rating and ability to obtain any necessary financing in the future and increase our cost of borrowing. In addition, our activitieslevel of indebtedness could make it more difficult to refinance our existing indebtness and could make us more vulnerable in the event of a continued downturn in our business. In these and other circumstances, servicing our indebtedness may use a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and make it more difficult for us to make payments of dividends and other distributions to our shareholders, including the holders of our ADSs, as well as to fund our operations, working capital and capital expenditures necessary for the maintenanceand expansion of our business activities.
Table of contents We cannot assure you that our credit ratings will not be lowered, suspended or withdrawn by the rating agencies. Our credit ratings are limited in scope, and do not address all material risks relating to an investment in the notes, but rather reflect only the views of the rating agencies at the time the ratings are issued. These ratings may affect the cost and other terms upon which we are able to obtain funding and are subject to government regulationchange either due to factors specific to us, trends in the formindustries we operate, or in credit and capital markets more generally. Our high level of taxesindebtedness and royalties, which canother factors have recently resulted in decreases in our credit ratings. In 2016, Fitch Ratings, Moody’s and S&P have decreased our credit ratings from B+, B1 and BB-, respectively, to B-, Caa1 and B, respectively, as of the date of this annual report. Credit rating agencies regularly evaluate us and their ratings of our long-term debt are based on a number of factors, including our financial strength. We cannot assure that credit rating agencies will not downgrade our credit ratings any further, or that such credit ratings will remain in effect for any given period of time or not be withdrawn entirely by the rating agencies, if, in the judgment of such rating agencies, circumstances so warrant. Any lowering, suspension or withdrawal of such ratings may have an importantadverse effect on us, our financial impact oncondition, results of operations and profitability, including our operations. In the countries where we operate, governments may impose new taxes or royalties, raiseability to refinance our existing taxes and royalties, or change the basis on which they are calculated in a manner unfavorable to us.indebtedness. MalfunctioningAccidents or malfunctioning equipment or accidents on our premises, railways or ports may decrease or interrupt production, internal logistics or distribution of our products. products and negatively impact our business.
The steel and iron ore production processes depend on certain critical equipment, such as blast furnaces, steel converters, continuous casting machines, rolling mills, drillers, reclaimers, conveyor belts, crushing and screening equipment and shiploaders, as well as on internal logistics and distribution channels, such as railways and seaports. This equipment and infrastructure may be affected in the case of malfunction or damage. In 2006, there was an accident involving the gas cleaning system adjacent to Blast Furnace No. 3 at the Presidente Vargas Steelworks, which prevented us from operating this blast furnace for approximately six months. At the end of 2015, the Company interrupted operation of the Blast Furnace No. 02 as from 2016, decreasing our annual production capacity of steel at the Presidente Vargas Steelworks by 26%. Similar or any other significant interruptions in our production process, internal logistics or distribution channels (including our ports and railways) could materially and adversely affect us. In addition, our operations involve the use, handling, storage, discharge anddisposal of hazardous substances into the environment. Our mining, steel and cement businesses are generally subject to significant risks and hazards, including fire, explosions, toxic gas leaks, spilling of polluting substances or other hazardous materials, rockfall incidents in mining operations and incidents involving mobile equipment or machinery. Such events could occur by accident or by breach of operating and maintenance standards, and could result in a significant environmental impact, damage to or destruction of our mineral properties and/or production facilities, personal injury or death, delays or suspensions in production, monetary losses and possible legal liability. We have health, safety and environmental standards and risk management programs and procedures in place to mitigate such risks, including in relation to our tailing dams. Notwithstanding our internal standards, policies and controls, our operations remain subject to incidents or accidents that could negatively and adversely affect our business reputation, results of operations and financial results. Our insurance policies may not be sufficient to cover all our losses We maintain several types of insurance policies, in line with the risk management of our businesses, which attempt to follow industry market practices for similar activities. Coverage in such policies encompasses domestic and international (import and export) cargo transportation (road, rail, sea or air), carrier liability, life insurance, personal accidents, health, auto insurance, D&O, general liability, erection risks, boiler and machinery coverage, exporttrade credit insurance, guarantee, surety, named perils, ports and terminal liabilities. We also have an operational risks policy for thePresidentethe Presidente Vargas Steelworks, Congonhas Minérios, Sepetiba Tecon and some of our branches and subsidiariesCSN Mining for a total insured value of US$ 500U.S.$ 600 million out of a total risk amount of US$ 17.7U.S.$ 11.1 billion. Under the terms of this policy we remain responsible for the first US$ 300U.S.$ 375 million in losses (materiallosses(material damages and loss of profits). The coverage obtained in these insurance policies may not be sufficient to cover all risks we are exposed to. Additionally, we may not be able to successfully contract or renew our insurance policies in terms satisfactory to us, whichus. The occurrence of one or more of these events may adversely affect our financial position.
Table Of Contentsof contents Our projects are subject to risks that may result in increased costs and/or delaydelays or that could prevent their successful implementation. We are investing to further increase our steel, mining and cement production capacity, as well as our logistics capabilities. See “Item 4D. Property, Plant and Equipment—Capital Expenditures—Planned Investments.”Investments”. These projects are subject to a number of risks that may adversely affect our growth prospects and profitability, including the following: · we may encounter delays, availability problems or higher than expected costs in obtaining the necessary equipment, services and materials to build and operate a project; · our efforts to develop projects according to schedule may be hampered by a lack of infrastructure, including availability of overburden and waste disposal areas as well as reliable power and water supplies; · we may fail to obtain, lose, or experience delays or higher than expected costs in obtaining or renewing the required permits, authorizations, licenses, concessions and/or regulatory approvals to build or continue a project; and · changes in market conditions, laws or regulations may make a project less profitable than expected or economically or otherwise unfeasible. Any one or a combination of the factors described above may materially and adversely affect us. Current, new or more stringent environmental, safety and health regulations imposed on us may result in increased liabilities and increased capital expenditures. Our steel making, mining, cement, energy and logistics facilities are subject to a broad range of laws, regulations and permit requirements in Brazil relating mainly to the protection of health, safety and the environment. Brazilian pollution standards are expected to continue to change, including the introduction of new effluent and air emission standards, water management and solid waste-handling regulations, andwildlife maintenance regulations, restrictions on business expansions, native forest preservation requirements in rural land.and the obligation to create privately owned conservation areas (Reserva Particular do Patrimônio Natural), or RPPNs, as an environmental compensation for industrial and mining expansion projects. The Brazilian government has adopted a decree under the national policy for climate change (Política Nacional de Mudanças Climáticas) that contemplates a 5% reduction in carbon emissions projected for 2020 for the industrial sector (including steel making and cement sectors) and an action plan for the sector is being developed by a technical committee composed of representatives from the government, industry associations and academia. The target reduction for the mining sector is yet to be established. In addition, the state of Rio de Janeiro, through its State Environmental Agency (Instituto Estadual do Ambiente), or INEA, issued a law in effect from 2013 onwards that requires steel making and cement facilities to present action plans to reduce greenhouse gas emissions when renewing or applying for operational licenses. In regard to air emission standards, the Environmental National Council, or CONAMA, issued a resolution that obliges steel companies to comply with certain restrictions until 2018. The federal government has also established a national policy for solid waste (Política Nacional de Resíduos Sólidos), which provides for more strict guidelines for solid waste management and industry targets for reverse logistics as part of the environmental licensing process. Finally, a new regulatory framework for mining operations is currently being developed by the Department of Geology, Mining and Mineral Processing from the Ministry of Mines and Energy, which may impose stricter regulations on our mining operations, including requests for environmental recovery of areas and investments for the granting of mining concessions. New or more stringent environmental, safety and health standards imposed on us could require us to make increased capital expenditures, create additional legal preservation areas in our properties, or make modifications in operating practices or projects. Especially with regard to our mining activities, new more stringent environmental, health and safety standards, including with respect to the licensing process of our projects and operations, could be imposed due to a major accident occurred in Brazil in 2015involving the Fundão tailing dam of Samarco Mineração S.A. As a result, the amount and timing of future environmental and related expenditures may vary substantially from those currently anticipated. These additional costs may also have a negative impact on the profitability of the projects we intend to implement or may make such projects economically unfeasible. We could also be exposed to civil penalties, criminal sanctions and closure orders for non-compliance with these regulations.regulations, as well as encounter delays in the receipt of environmental or other operating licenses. Waste disposal and emission practices may result in the need for us to clean up or retrofit our facilities at substantial costs and/or could result in substantial liabilities. Environmental legislation restrictions imposed by foreign markets to which we export our products may also materially and adversely affect our export sales and us.
Table Of Contentsof contents In addition, we may be requested to enter into Terms of Undertaking (Termos de Ajustamento de Conduta), or TACs with Brazilian regulators and agencies that require us to minimize or eliminate the risk of environmental damagesimpacts in the areas where we operate. If we are unable to comply with a Term of UndertakingTAC in a timely manner, we may be exposed to penalties, such as fines, revocation of permits, or closure of facilities. See “Item 4B. Government Regulation and Other Legal Matters – Environmental Expenditures and Claims.” Claims and Item 8A – Financial Information – Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information – Legal Proceedings”. Our governance and compliance processesprocedures may fail to prevent regulatory penalties and reputational harm. We operate in a global environment, and our activities straddle multiple jurisdictions and complex regulatory frameworks with increased enforcement activities worldwide. Our governance and compliance processesprocedures may not prevent future breaches of law, accounting and/or governance standards. We may be subject to breaches of our Code of Ethics, business conduct protocols and instances of fraudulent behavior and dishonesty by our employees, contractors or other agents. Our employees or our employees’, contractors’ or other agents’ failure to comply with applicable laws and other standards could subject us to fines, loss of operating licenses and reputational harm, as well as other penalties, which may materially and adversely affect us. We may fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, which could prevent us from timely and accurately reporting our financial results
The Company's internal controls over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements on a timely manner due to inherent limitations, including human error, circumvention or overriding of controls, or fraud. Even effective internal controls can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements. If the Company fails to maintain the adequacy of its internal controls, including any failure to implement new or improved required controls, the Company's business and financial results could be harmed and the Company could fail to meet its financial reporting obligations. In this regard, and in connection with management’s evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, management determined that the Company did not maintain effective controls over the Significant Unusual Transactions (SUT) and that the ineffective control over SUT constitutes a material weakness. While the Company is in the process of improving its internal controls, the material weakness will continue to exist until the remediation actions are fully implemented and tested. If the new controls being implemented to address the material weakness and to strengthen the overall internal control over accounting for SUT do not operate effectively, or if the Company is unsuccessful in implementing or maintaining these new controls or is otherwise unable to remediate this material weakness, the Company’s financial reporting may be disclosed untimely or with inaccuracies, which could negatively impact the Company’s business and financial results. Some of our operations depend on joint ventures, jointly controlled entities, consortia and other forms of cooperation, and our business could be adversely affected if our partners fail to observe their commitments. We currently operate parts of our business through joint-venturesjoint ventures, strategic alliances and consortia with other companies. We have, among others, established a joint-venturestrategic alliance with an Asian consortium at our 60% consolidatedcontrolled investee NacionalCongonhas Minérios S.A., or Namisa,Congonhas, to mine iron ore;ore, a joint-venturejoint venture with other Brazilian steel and mining companies at MRS Logística S.A., or MRS, to explore railway transportation in the Southeastern region of Brazil, a joint-venturejoint venture with certain Brazilian governmental entities at Transnordestina Logística S.A., or TLSA, to explore railway transportation in the Northeastern region of Brazil, a joint venture with Tractebel Energia S.A. and Cia. de Cimento Itambé at Itá Energética S.A., or ITASA, to produce electricity, and a consortium with Vale S.A., Votorantim Metais Zinco S.A., CEMIG Geração e Transmissão S.A. and Anglo Gold Ashant Córrego do Sítio Mineração S.A. at Igarapava Hydroelectric Power Plant to produce electricity. Our forecasts and plans for these joint-venturestheseis strategic alliances, joint ventures and consortia assume that our partners will observe their obligations to make capital contributions, purchase products and, in some cases, provide managerial personnel or financing. In addition, many of the projects contemplated by our joint-venturesjoint ventures or consortia rely on financing commitments, which contain certain preconditions for each disbursement. If any of our partners fails to observe their commitments or we fail to comply with all preconditions required under our financing commitments or other partnership arrangements, the affected joint-venture,joint venture, consortium or other project may not be able to operate in accordance with its business plans, or we may have to increase the level of our investment to implement these plans. In addition, certain of our joint venture agreements provide for customary dispute and deadlock resolutionmechanisms, as well as put and call options exercisable under certain circumstances, which may require us to incur disbursements. Any of these events may have a materialan adverse effect on us. Our mineral reserve estimates may materially differ from the mineral quantities that we may be able to actually recover; our estimates of mine life may prove inaccurate; and market price fluctuations and changes in operating and capital costs may render certain ore reserves uneconomical to mine.
Our reported ore reserves are estimated quantities of ore and minerals that we have determined can be economically mined and processed under present and anticipated conditions to extract their mineral content. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of reserves and in projecting potential future rates of mineral production, including many factors beyond our control. Reserve engineering involves estimating deposits of minerals that cannot be measured in an exact manner, and the accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data and engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. As a result, no assurance can be given that the indicated amount of ore will be recovered or that it will be recovered at the rates we anticipate. Estimates of different engineers may vary, and results of our mining and production subsequent to the date of an estimate may lead to revision of estimates. Reserve estimates and estimates of mine life may require revision based on actual production experience and other factors. For example, fluctuations in the market prices of minerals and metals, reduced recovery rates or increased operating and capital costs due to inflation, exchange rates or other factors may render proven and probable reserves uneconomic to exploit and may ultimately result in a restatement of reserves. See “Item 4B—Business Overview—Our Mining Segment—Mineral Reserves.”
Table Of Contentsof contents We may not be able to adjust our mining production volume in a timely or cost-efficient manner in response to changes in demand.
Revenues from our mining business represented in 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively, 24%, 35% and 26% of our total net revenues. Our ability to rapidly increase production capacity is limited, which could render us unable to fully satisfy demand for our products. When demand exceeds our production capacity, we may meet excess customer demand by purchasing iron ore from unrelated parties and reselling it, which would increase our costs and narrow our operating margins. If we are unable to satisfy excess customer demand in this way, we may lose customers. In addition, operating close to full capacity may expose us to higher costs, including demurrage fees due to capacity restraints in our logistics systems.
Conversely, operating at significant idle capacity during periods of weak demand may expose us to higher unit production costs since a significant portion of our cost structure is fixed in the short-term due to the high capital intensity of mining operations. In addition, efforts to reduce costs during periods of weak demand could be limited by labor regulations or existing labor or government agreements.
Adverse economic developments in China could have a negative impact on our revenues, cash flow and profitability.
China has been the main driver of global demand for minerals and metals over the last few years. In 2012, China accounted for 66% of the global seaborne iron ore trade. The percentage of our iron ore sales volume to consumers in China was 22% in 2012. A contraction of China’s economic growth could result in lower demand for our products, leading to lower revenues, cash flow and profitability. Poor performance in the Chinese real estate sector, one of the largest consumers of carbon steel in China, could also negatively impact our results.
Drilling and production risks could adversely affect the mining process. Once mineral deposits are discovered, it can take a number of years from the initial phases of drilling until production is possible, during which time the economic feasibility of production may change. Substantial time and expenditures are required to: · establish mineral reserves through drilling; · determine appropriate mining and metallurgical processes for optimizing the recovery of metal contained in ore; · obtain environmental and other licenses; · construct mining, processing facilities and infrastructure required for greenfield properties; and · obtain the ore or extract the minerals from the ore. If a mining project proves not to be economically feasible by the time we are able to profit from it, we may incur substantial losses and be obliged to take write-offs. In addition, potential changes or complications involving metallurgical and other technological processes arising during the life of a project may result in delays and cost overruns that may render the project not economically feasible. Our mineral reserve estimates may materially differ from the mineral quantities that we may be able to actually recover; our estimates of mine life may prove inaccurate; market price fluctuations and changes in operating and capital costs may render certain ore reserves uneconomical to mine; and we may face rising extraction costs or investment requirements over time as our reserves deplete. Our reported ore reserves are estimated quantities of ore and minerals that we have determined can be economically mined and processed under present and anticipated conditions to extract their mineral content. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of reserves and in projecting potential future rates of mineral production, including many factors beyond our control. Reserve engineering involves estimating deposits of minerals that cannot be measured in an exact manner, and the accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data and engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. As a result, no assurance can be given that the indicated amount of ore will be recovered or that it will be recovered at the rates we anticipate. Estimates of different engineers may vary, and results of our mining production subsequent to the date of an estimate may lead to revision of estimates. Reserve estimates and estimates of mine life may require revision based on actual production experience and other factors. For example, fluctuations in the market prices of minerals and metals, reduced recovery rates or increased operating and capital costs due to inflation, exchange rates or other factors may render proven and probable reserves uneconomic to exploit and may ultimately result in a restatement of reserves. In addition, reserves are gradually depleted in the ordinary course of our exploration activities. As mining progresses, distances to the primary crusher and to waste deposits becomes longer and pits become steeper. Also, for some types of reserves, mineralization grade decreases and hardness increases at increased depths. As a result, over time we may experience rising unit extraction costs with respect to each mine, or we may need to make additional investments, including adaptation or construction of processing plants and expansion or construction of tailing dams. Our exploration programs may also fail to result in the expansion or replacement of reserves depleted by current production. If we do not enhance existing reserves or develop new operations, we may not be able to sustain our current level of production beyond the remaining lives of our existing mines. See “Item 4B—Business Overview—Our Mining Segment—Mineral Reserves”. Natural and other disasters could disrupt our operations. Our business and operating results could be negatively impacted by social, technical and/or physical risks such as flooding, fire, power loss, loss or reduction of water supply, leakages, accidents, as well as telecommunications and information technology system failures, and political instability, including a global economic slowdown.failures. For example, flooding in Australia at the
Table of contents end of 2010 affected global coal supply and consequently increased our raw material costs. In addition, heavy rainfall in the Southeast Region of Brazil, as well as power and water supply shortages and rationing programs could affect our iron ore and logistics operations and consequently our revenues. Such events could affect our ability to conduct our business operations and, as a result, reduce our operating results and materially and adversely affect us.
Table Of Contents
We may not be able to consummate proposed acquisitions successfully or integrate acquired businesses successfully. From time to time, we may evaluate acquisition opportunities that would strategically fit our business objectives. If we are unable to complete acquisitions, or integrate successfully and develop these businesses to realize revenue growth and cost savings, our financial results could be adversely affected. Acquisitions also pose the risk that we may be exposed to successor liability involving an acquired company. Due diligence conducted in connection with an acquisition, and any contractual guarantees or indemnities that we receive, may not be sufficient to protect us from, or compensate us for, actual liabilities. A material liability associated with an acquisition, such as labor-labor or environmental-related,environmental liability, could adversely affect our reputation and financial performance and reduce the benefits of the acquisition. In addition, we may incur asset impairment charges related to acquisitions, which may reduce our profitability. Finally, ourOur acquisition activities may also present financial, managerial and operational risks, including diversion of management attention from existing core businesses, difficulties integrating or separating personnel, and financial and other systems, failure to achieve the operational benefits that were anticipated at the time of the transaction, adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and customers, inaccurate estimates of fair value made in the accounting for acquisitions andand/or amortization of acquired intangible assets which would reduce future reported earnings, potential loss of customers or key employees of acquired businesses, and indemnities and potential disputes with the buyers or sellers. Finally, proposed acquisitions may also be subject to review from the competition authorities of the countries involved in the transaction, which may approve such transaction, approve such transaction with restrictions, including the divestment of assets, or reject it. Any of these activities or adverse regulatory decisions could negatively affect our reputation, product sales, financial condition andand/or results of operations. We have a substantial amount of indebtedness, which could make it more difficult or expensivemay not be able to refinancemaintain adequate liquidity and our maturing debtcash flows from operations and /or incur new debt.available capital may not be sufficient to meet our obligations As While our cash flows from operations and available capital have been sufficient to meet our current operating expenses, contractual obligations and debt service requirements to date, our liquidity, cash flows from operations and available capital may be negatively impacted by the pricing environment for our steel and iron ore products, the exchange rate environment and the effects of December 31, 2012,continued negative economic conditions in Brazil. These factors have materially and adversely impacted our totalliquidity and we expect this trend to continue. Recent cost cutting measures implemented by us may not be sufficient to offset these effects or improve our liquidity.
We have recently announced certain measures to improve our liquidity and debt outstanding amounted to R$30,284 million, consistingprofile, including the potential sale of R$2,326 millioncertain assets and the extension of short-termour debt with Caixa Economica Federal and R$27,958 million of long-term debt. See “Item 5B.Banco do Brasil (for further information, see Item “5B. Liquidity and Capital Resources”). If we are unable to successfully sell certain assets and/or reduce our leverage, we may not be able to maintain adequate liquidity and “Item 18. Financial Statements.” Although we had R$14,445 million of cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2012, our planned investments in all of our business segments will require a significant amount of cash over the course of 2013 and following years. See “Item 4D. Property, Plant and Equipment – Capital Expenditures – Planned Investments.” The level of our indebtedness could affect our credit rating and ability to obtain any necessary financing in the future and increase our cost of borrowing. In these and other circumstances, servicing our indebtedness may use a substantial portion of our cash flowflows from operations which could make it more difficult for usand available capital may not be sufficient to make payments of dividends and other distributions tomeet our shareholders, including the holders of our ADSs, and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.obligations.
We have experienced labor disputes in the past that have disrupted our operations, and such disputes may recur. A substantial number of our employees and some of the employees of our subcontractors are represented by labor unions and are covered by collective bargaining or other labor agreements, which are subject to periodic renegotiation. Strikes and other labor disruptions at any of our facilities or labor disruptions involving third parties who may provide us with goods or services, have in the past and may in the future materially and adversely affect the operation of our facilities, and/or the timing of completion and the cost of our projects. We are exposed to the risk of litigation
Table of contents We are currently and may in the future be a party to legal proceedings and claims. For some of these legal proceedings and claims, we have not established anya provision on our balance sheet or have only established provisions for part of the amounts in question, based on our and our external or internal counsel’s judgment as to the likelihood of an outcome favorable to us. Although we are contesting such proceedings and claims, the outcome of each specific proceeding and claim is uncertain and may result in obligations that could materially and adversely affect our business and the value of our shares and ADSs. See “Item 8A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal Proceedings” for additional information.
Table Of Contents
Risks Relating to our Common Shares and ADSs Our controlling shareholder has the ability to direct our business and affairs and its interests could conflict with yours. Our controlling shareholder has the power to, among other things, elect a majority of our directors and determine the outcome of any action requiring shareholder approval, including transactions with related parties, corporate reorganizations, acquisitions, dispositions, the destination and diversification of our investments, and the timing and payment of any future dividends, subject to minimum dividend payment requirements imposed under Brazilian Corporate Law. Our controlling shareholder may have an interest in pursuing acquisitions, dispositions, financings or similar transactions that could conflict with your interests as a holder of our common shares and ADSs. For a description of our ownership structure, see “Item 7A. Major Shareholders.”Shareholders”. If you surrender your ADSs and withdraw common shares, you risk losing the ability to remit foreign currency abroad and certain Brazilian tax advantages. As an ADS holder, you benefit from the electronic certificate of foreign capital registration obtained by the custodian for our common shares underlying the ADSs in Brazil, which permitsallows the custodian to convert dividends and other distributions with respect to the common shares into non-Brazilian currency and remit the proceeds abroad. If you surrender your ADSs and withdraw common shares, you will be entitled to continue to rely on the custodian’s electronic certificate of foreign capital registration for only five business days from the date of withdrawal. Thereafter, upon the disposition of, or distributions relating to, the common shares, you will not be able to remit abroad non-Brazilian currency unless you obtain your own electronic certificate of foreign capital registration or you qualify under Brazilian foreign investment regulations that entitle some foreign investors to buy and sell shares on Brazilian stock exchanges without obtaining separate electronic certificates of foreign capital registration. If you do not qualify under the foreign investment regulations you will generally be subject to less favorable tax treatment of dividends and distributions on, and the proceeds from any sale of, our common shares. For more information regarding exchange controls, see “Item 10.D. Exchange Controls.”Controls”. If you seek to obtain your own electronic certificate of foreign capital registration, you may incur expenses or suffer delays in the application process, which could delay your ability to receive dividends or distributions relating to our common shares or the return of your capital in a timely manner. The depositary’s electronic certificate of foreign capital registration may also be adversely affected by future legislative changes. Holders of ADSs may not be able to exercise their voting rights. Holders of ADSs may only exercise their voting rights with respect to the underlying common shares in accordance with the provisions of the deposit agreement. Under the deposit agreement, ADS holders must vote by giving voting instructions to the depositary. Upon receipt of the voting instructions of the ADS holder, the depositary will vote the underlying common shares in accordance with these instructions. If we ask for voting instructions, the depositary will notify ADS holders of the upcoming vote and will arrange to deliver the proxy card. We cannot assure that ADS holders will receive the proxy card in time to ensure that they can instruct the depositary to vote. In addition, the depositary and its agents are not liable for failing to carry out voting instructions or for the manner of carrying out voting instructions. Alternatively, ADS holders can exercise their right to vote by surrendering their ADSs for cancellation in exchange for our common shares. Pursuant to our bylaws, the first call for a shareholders’ meeting must be published at least 15 days in advance of the meeting, and the second call must be published at least eight08 days in advance of the meeting. When a shareholders’ meeting is convened, holders of ADSs may not receive sufficient advance notice to surrender their ADSs in exchange for the underlyingtheunderlying common shares to allow them to vote with respect to any specific matter. As a result, holders of ADSs may not be able to exercise their voting rights.
Table of contents The relative volatility and illiquidity of the Brazilian securities markets may substantially limit your ability to sell the common shares underlying the ADSs at the price and time you desire. Investing in securities that trade in emerging markets, such as Brazil, often involves greater risk than investing in securities of issuers in the United States, and such investments are generally considered to be more speculative in nature. The Brazilian securities market is substantially smaller, less liquid, more concentrated and can be more volatile than major securities markets in the United States. The ten largest companies in terms of market capitalization represented 51.8%40% of the total market capitalization of the BM&FBOVESPA as of December 31, 2012.2015. The top ten stocks in terms of trading volume accounted for 43.0%46%, 47.2% and 48.8%36.9% of all shares traded ontheon the BM&FBOVESPA in 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010,2013, respectively. Accordingly, although you are entitled to withdraw the common shares underlying the ADSs from the depositary at any time, your ability to sell the common shares underlying the ADSs at a price and time at which you wish to do so may be substantially limited.
Table Of Contents
Holders of ADSs may be unable to exercise preemptive rights with respect to our common shares. We may not be able to offer our common shares to U.S. holders of ADSs pursuant to preemptive rights granted to holders of our common shares in connection with any future issuance of our common shares unless a registration statement under the Securities Act is effective with respect to such common shares and preemptive rights, or an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act is available. We are not obligated to file a registration statement relating to preemptive rights with respect to our common shares or to undertake steps that may be needed to find exemptions from registration available, and we cannot assure you that we will file any such registration statement or take any such steps. If such a registration statement is not filed and an exemption from registration does not exist,exist. The JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as depositary, may attempt to sell the preemptive rights, and you will be entitled to receive the proceeds of such sale. However, these preemptive rights will expire if the depositary does not sell them, and U.S. holders of ADSs will not realize any value from the granting of such preemptive rights. Fora more complete description of preemptive rights with respect to the underlying shares, see “Item 10B. Memorandum and Articles of Association—Preemptive Rights.”Rights”. A decrease in our market capitalization may increase volatility. In recent years our market capitalization has decreased and as a result the volatility in the trading price of our common shares and ADSs has increased. Any further decreases in our market capitalization may further increase volatility. In 2015, the trading price of our ADSs dropped for a certain period below the levels required by the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). If the trading price of our ADSs again drops below those levels, we may be required to do a reverse stock split or a ratio change of the number of common shares per ADS in order to regain compliance with NYSE´s listing standards. Item 4. Information on the Company 4A. History and Development of the Company History
Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional is a Brazilian corporation (sociedade por ações) incorporated in 1941 pursuant to a decree of the Brazilian Presidentpresident at the time, Getúlio Vargas. The Presidente Vargas Steelworks, located in the city of Volta Redonda, in the Statestate of Rio de Janeiro, started the production of coke, pig iron and steel products in 1946. Also in 1946, we incorporated both the Casa de Pedra Mine, located in the city of Congonhas, State of Minas Gerais, and the Arcos Mine, located in the city of Arcos, State of Minas Gerais. The Casa de Pedra Mine assures us self-sufficiency in iron ore, whereas the Arcos Mine meets all our needs for flux, limestone and dolomite. The Company was privatized through a series of auctions held in 1993 and early 1994, through which the Brazilian government sold its 91% ownership interest.
Table of contents Between 1993 and 2002, we implemented a capital improvement program aimed at increasing our annual production of crude steel, improving the quality of our products and enhancing our environmental protection and cleanup programs. As part of the investments, since February 1996, all our production has been based on the continuous casting process, rather than ingot casting, which involved an alternative method that resulted in higher energy use and metal loss. From 1996 until 2002, we spent the equivalent of US$U.S.$2.4 billion on the capital improvement program and on maintaining our operational capacity, culminating with the renovation of Blast Furnace No. 3 and Hot Strip Mill No. 2 in 2001. These measures resulted in the increase of our annual production capacity to 5.6 million tons of crude steel and 5.1 million tons of rolled products. In 2007, CSN started to sell iron ore in the seaborne market. We are now Brazil’s second largestToday, CSN, through its controlled company Congonhas Minérios, is an important exporter of iron ore, drawing from ourthe high quality iron ore reserves in the Casa de Pedra and NamisaEngenho mines, located in the state of Minas Gerais. We also ownCongonhas Minérios currently holds the concession to operate the Terminal de Carvão, or TECAR, a solid bulks terminal fromlocated in Itaguaí Port in the state of Rio de Janeiro, through which we export thisCongonhas Minérios exports iron ore.ore and imports coal and coke. In 2009, we entered the cement market with our first grinding mill, next to the Presidente Vargas Steel Mill in Volta Redonda, Rio de Janeiro, taking advantage of the synergies with our steel business. In order to diversify our product portfolio, we entered in the long steel market in 2012, with the acquisition of Stahlwerk Thüringen Gmbh, orSWT, a long steel manufacturer located in Unterwellenborn, Germany.
Table Of ContentsIn addition, a new plant for production of long steel products has been installed at Volta Redonda and started operations in December 2013. The plant consists on an electric arc steelmaking furnace, continuous casting for billets and a hot rolling mill for round section long products. This plant, which is in a ramp up process, is scheduled to reach its full production rate of 500,000 t/year at the end of 2016, providing the domestic market with rebar for civil construction and wire rod for industrial and civil construction applications.
General We operate throughout the entire steel production chain, from the mining of iron ore to the production and sale of a diversified range of high value-added steel products. We divide our business into five segments: steel, mining, cement, logistics and energy businesses. Steel In our flat steel segment, we are one of the largest an almostfully integrated steelmaker. Presidente Vargas Steelworks produce a broad line of steel producers in Brazilproducts, including slabs, hot and Latin America in terms of crude steel production. cold-rolled, galvanized and tin mill products for the distribution, packaging, automotive, home appliance and construction industries. Our current annual crude steel capacity and rolled product capacity at the Presidente Vargas Steelworks is 5.6 million and 5.1 million tons, respectively. At the Presidente Vargas Steelworks,In 2015, production of crude steel increased by 2% asremained stable when compared to 2011,with 2014, while the production of rolled steel products remained stabledecreased 7% when compared to 2011. We also operate in the mining, cement, logistics and energy businesses, which have become increasingly important to our operations and growth. Steel
Our fully integrated manufacturing facilities at the Presidente Vargas Steelworks produce a broad line of steel products, including slabs, hot- and cold-rolled, galvanized and tin mill products for the distribution, packaging, automotive, home appliance and construction industries. In 2011, we accounted for approximately 55% of the coated steel products market in Brazil. We are one of the world’s leading producers of tin mill products for packaging containers, and were responsible for approximately 98% of the market share in Brazil in 2011, according to IABr data and our sales information. Market share information for 2012 was not yet available as of the date of this annual report.2014.
Our production process is based on the integrated steelworks concept. Below is a brief summary of the steel making process at our Presidente Vargas Steelworks: - Iron ore produced from our own company mines is processed in continuous sintering machines to produce sinter;
- Sinter and lump ore direct charges are smelted with lump coke and injected powdered coal in blast furnaces to produce pig iron;
- Pig iron is then refined into steel via basic oxygen converters;
- Steel is continuously cast in slabs; and
- Slabs are then hot rolled, producing hot bands that are coiled and sent to finishing facilities.
We currently obtain all of our iron ore except for the pellets, limestone and dolomite requirements, and a portion of our tin requirements from our own mines. Using imported coal, we produce approximately 67%58.4% of our coke requirements at current production levels in our own coke batteries at Volta Redonda. Imported coal is also pulverized and used directly in the pig iron production process. Zinc, manganese ore, aluminum and a portion of our tin requirements are purchased in local markets. Our steel production and distribution processes also require water, industrial gases, electricity, rail and road transportation, and port facilities.
Table of contents In addition to the production of flat steel, we are investing in our long steel production capacity. We are currently building a long steel plant in Volta Redonda with a planned capacity of 500 Kt per year. This plant will also use our existing infrastructure in the Presidente Vargas Steelworks. On January 31, 2012, in an effort to strengthen our position inentered into the long steel segment, we acquired SWTwith the acquisition of Stahlwerk Thüringen Gmbh (SWT) in 2012 for €483.4 million. SWT is a long steel producer in Germany with annual production capacity of approximately 1.1 million tons of steel profiles.sections. We also completed a new plant for production of long steel products in Volta Redonda, in December 2013. The plant consists of an electric arc steelmaking furnace, continuous casting for billets and a hot rolling mill for round section long products – wire rod and rebar. We expect this plant to reach 500,000 t/year output when fully operational, providing the domestic market with products for civil construction. Mining Activities We own a number of high quality iron ore mines, all located within Brazil’s Iron Ore Quadrangle (Quadrilátero Ferrífero), in the state of Minas Gerais, including the Casa de Pedra mine,and Engenho mines, located in the city of Congonhas, and Namisa – Nacionalpertaining to our controlled investee, Congonhas Minérios, S.A.and Fernandinho mines, (Fernandinho, located in the city of Itabirito and Engenho, alsothe Cayman and Pedras Pretas mining rights, located in Congonhas)the city of Rio Acima and Congonhas, respectively, pertaining to our wholly owned subsidiary Minérios Nacional S.A. (“Minérios Nacional”, former Mineração Nacional S.A.). Our mining assets also include the cargo terminal Itaguaí Port, or TECAR, a solid bulks seaport terminal,pertaining to Congonhas Minérios, the Bocaina mines, located in Itaguaí Port in the statecity of Rio de Janeiro, Mineração Bocaina, located in Arcos, in the state of Minas Gerais, which produces dolomite and limestone, and Estanho de Rondônia S.A. (ERSA), which mines and casts tin,or ERSA, located in the city of Ariquemes, in the state of Rondônia.nia, which mines and casts tin. We sold 21.5 million tons, 25.2 million tons and 25.7 million tons of iron ore in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. Logistics Our verticalization strategy and intense synergies among the Company'sour business units are strongly dependent on the logistics createdneeded to guarantee the transportation of the inputs at a low operating cost. A number of railroadsrailways and port terminals make up the logistics system integrating CSN'sour mining, steelmaking and cement units.
Table Of Contents
CSN manages twoWe operate a port terminalsterminal for containers, Sepetiba Tecon, at Itaguaí, Port, in the state of Rio de Janeiro, one for bulk solids (TECAR) and one for containers (Sepetiba Tecon).Congonhas Minérios operates the solid bulks terminal, or TECAR, also located at Itaguaí Port, in the state of Rio de Janeiro.
CSNWe also hashave interests in twothree railways: MRS Logística, in which(i) we share control and thatin MRS Logística S.A., which operates the former Southeast NetworkSystem of the Federal Railroad Network,Railway System, along the Rio de Janeiro-São Paulo-Belo Horizonte axis, and ouraxis; (ii) we have an interest in jointly controlled subsidiaryinvestee Transnordestina Logística S.A., whose Novaor TLSA; and (iii) we control Ferrovia Transnordestina project will connectLogística S.A, or FTL, which operates the interior of Northeast Brazil to Pecém and Suape Ports, with an extension of 1,728 km of track.former Northeastern Railway System or RFFSA.
Cement CSNWe entered the cement market in May 2009, driven by the high synergy with its currentour steelmaking business. This segment takes advantage of the slag generated by our blast furnaces, and of our limestone, used to produce clinker, reserves, located in the city of Arcos, in the state of Minas Gerais. Limestone is used to produce clinker,clinker. Clinker and slag account for approximately 95% ofare the cost ofmain inputs in cement production.
CSN plansWe plan to increase itsour market share in the cement segment in Brazil in order to diversify itsour product mix and markets, reducing risks and adding value for itsour shareholders.
Energy Steelmaking requires significant amounts of electricity to power rolling mills, production lines, hot metal processing, coking plants and auxiliary units. In 2015, our Presidente Vargas Steelworks consumed approximately 3.012 million MWh of electric energy.
Table of contents CSNOur main source of electricity is one of Brazil’s largest industrial electricour thermoelectric co-generation power consumers. Since 1999,plant at the Presidente Vargas Steelworks, which is fueled by the gases from the steel production process, with 235.2 MW installed capacity. In addition, we have invested in power generation projects in order to ensure self-sufficiency. Our electrical assets include: (i) CSN’sa 29.5% stakeinterest in the Itá Hydroelectric Power Plant in Santa Catarina, corresponding to 167 MW, through a 48.75% equity interest in Itá Energética S.A.; (ii) CSN’sITASA, and a 17.9% interest in the 210-MW Igarapava Hydroelectric Power Plant in Minas Gerais, corresponding tofrom which we have ensured energy an average of 167 MW and an overage of 23 MW; and (iii) a 238 MW, cogeneration thermoelectric power plant in Presidente Vargas Steelworks, which is fueled by the waste gases from the steel production process.respectively. These three plants give CSN an average generation capacity of 428425 MW, supplying the group’s total need for powerpower. In 2014, we installed a new turbine generator at the Presidente Vargas Steelworks, which adds 21 MW to our existing installed capacity. This turbine is located near our Blast Furnace No. 3, using the outlet gases from the iron making process to generate energy..
Other Information CSN’s legal and commercial name is Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional. CSN is organized for an unlimited period of time under the laws of the Federative Republic of Brazil. Our head offices are located at Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 3400, 19th19th and 20th20th floors and 15th 15thfloor - part, Itaim Bibi, São Paulo, Brazil, CEP 04538-132, and our telephone number is +55-11-3049-7100. CSN’s agent for service of process in the United States is CT Corporation, with offices at 111 Eighth Avenue, New York, New York 10011. 4B. Business Overview Competitive Strengths We believe that we have the following competitive strengths: Fully integratedIntegrated business model.We believe we are one of the most fullya highly integrated steelmakers in the world.steelmaker. This is due to our captive sources of raw materials, especiallyprincipally iron ore, and access to owned infrastructure, such as railroadsrailways and deep-sea water port facilities.We own a number of high quality iron ore mines, all located within Brazil’s Iron Ore Quadrangle (Quadrilátero Ferrífero), in the State of Minas Gerais,, which differentiates distinguishing us from our main competitors in Brazil thatwhich have to purchase all or a portion of their iron ore from mining companies suchcompanies.
Profitable mining business. We have in recent years invested significantly in our mining business, placing CSN in a prominent position among the world’s leading iron ore players. Further expansions will enable expanding product portfolio and total output, increasing our presence in seaborn markets. The Company has high-quality iron ore reserves in Casa de Pedra, Engenho, Fernandinho and other mines, all located in Minas Gerais. Our mining activities provide relevant EBITDA generation. We sold 23.8 million tons in 2011, 20.2 million tons in 2012, 21.5 million tons in 2013, 25.2 million tons in 2014 (taking into account our proportional interest in Namisa throughout this period) and 25.7 million tons in 2015 (including 100% of NAMISA due to full consolidation of Congonhas Minerios as Vale S.A.of December, 2015). The company’s mining business also includes TECAR, asolid bulks terminal at Itaguai Port (RJ),with a capacity to handle 45 mtpy, Mineração Bocaina, located in Arcos (MG), or Vale. In additionwhich produces dolomite and limestone and ERSA, which mines and casts tin. During 2015, we implemented cost reduction actions, which along with theReal depreciation, reduced our production costs at the Casa de Pedra mine from US.$ 24.66/ton in 2014 to US.$ 15.56/ton in 2015. Thoroughly developed transport infrastructure.We have a thoroughly developed transport infrastructure, connecting our iron ore reserves,mine to our steel mill and to the port terminals we have captive dolomite and limestone mines that supply ouroperate. The Presidente Vargas Steelworks.Steelworks facility is located next to railway and port systems, facilitating the supply of raw materials, the shipment of our production and easy access to our main clients. Our steelworks are close to the main steel consumer centers in Brazil, with easy access to port facilities and railroads. See “Item 4B. Business Overview—Our mining segment” and “Item 4D—Property Plant and Equipment.” Profitable mining business.Our mining business has received investments in recent years, placing CSN in a prominent positionamong the country’s leading mining firms. Additional investments will increase capacity to approximately 89 mtpy, including third party purchases, thereby strengthening CSN’s position as an important player in the global iron ore market. The Company has high-quality iron ore reserves through Casa de Pedra mine and Namisa mines (Engenho and Fernandinho), both located in Minas Gerais. Our mining activities provide strongrevenue generation. We sold 10.5 million tons in 2007, 18.5 million tons in 2008, 17.5 million tons in 2009, 18.6 million tons in 2010, 23.8 million tons in 2011 and 20.2 million tons in 2012 (considering our proportional interest in Namisa throughout this period). The company’s mining assets also include TECAR,a solid bulks seaport terminal,with a capacity for 30 mtpy, located in Itaguaí Port (RJ), Mineração Bocaina, located in Arcos (MG), which produces dolomite and limestone, and Estanho de Rondônia SA (ERSA), which mines and casts tin.
Table Of Contents
Thoroughly developed transport infrastructure.We have a thoroughly developed transport infrastructure, from our iron ore mine to our steel mill and to our ports. The Presidente Vargas Steelworks facility is located next to railroad systems and port facilities, facilitating the supply of raw materials, the shipment of our production and easy access to our principal clients.railway. The concession for the main railroad usedrailway we use and operated by usoperate is owned by MRS, a company in which we hold a 33.27%34.94% direct and indirect ownership interest. The railway connects our Casa de Pedra mine to the Presidente Vargas Steelworks and to our terminals at Itaguaí Port, which handles our iron ore exports and most of our steel exports.exports, as well as our imports of coal and metallurgical coke. Since we obtained the concession to operateconstitution of MRS railway, in 1996, we haveit has significantly improved its tracksproductivity and developed its business, with strongincreased cash generation. We also own concessions to operate two deep-sea water terminals from which we export our products and import coal and small amounts
Table of coke, which are the only important raw materials that we need to purchase from third parties.contents Self-sufficiency in energy generation.We are self-sufficient in energy through our interests in the hydroelectric plants of Itá and Igarapava, andas well as our own thermoelectric plant located inside the Presidente Vargas Steelworks. We also sell the excess energy we generate in the energy market.market on a spot basis. Our 238256 MW thermoelectric cogenerationplant provides the Presidente Vargas Steelworks with approximately 60% of its energy needs infor its steel mills, using as its primary fuel the waste gases generated by our coke ovens, blast furnaces and steel processing facilities. We holda 29.5% stake in the Itá Hydroelectric Power Plant, in Santa Catarina, through a 48.75% equity interest in Itá Enérgetica S.A., or ITASA.Catarina. This ownership grants usan assured energy of 167 MW,, proportional to our interests in the project, pursuant to a 30-year power purchase agreements at a fixed price per megawatt hour, adjusted annually for inflation. In addition, we own 17.9% of the Igarapava hydroelectric plant, with 210 MW fully installed capacity. We have been using partcapacity and a direct take of our 23 MWof assured energy from Igarapava to supply energy to the Casa de Pedra and Arcos mines.us. Low cost structure.As a result of our fully integrated business model, our thoroughly developed transportation infrastructure and our self-sufficiency in energy generation, we have been consistently generating high margins.margins compared to peer companies of both steel and mining segmens. Other factors that lead to these margins areour low cost structure include the strategic location of our steelworks facility the use of state of the art technology andalong with our well qualified work force.force with a lean cost. Diverse product portfolio and product mix.We have a diversified flat steel product mix that includes hot-rolled, cold-rolled, galvanized and steel tin mill products, in order to meet a wide range of customer needs across all steel consuming industries. We focus on selling high marginhigh-margin products, such as tin plate,tin-coated, pre-painted, galvalume and galvanized products in our product mix.products. Our galvanized product providesproducts provide material for exposed auto parts, using hot-dip galvanized steel and laser-welded blanks. Our CSN Paraná branch provides us with additional capacity to produce high-quality galvanized, galvalume and pre-painted steel products for the construction and home appliance industries. In addition, our distribution subsidiary, Prada, one of the largest flat steel distributors in Brazil, offersprovides a strong sales channel in the domestic market, enabling us to meet demand from smaller customers, thus creating a strongan important presence in this market. Strong presence in domestic market and strategic international exposure for steel products.We have a strong presence in the domestic market for steel products, with 77%a market share above 30% of our steel sales in the domestic market.In 2011, we accounted for approximately 55% offlat steel market, according to the market in Brazil for coated steel products, of which we had 98% of the market share in Brazil for tin mill products. Market share information for 2012 was not yet available as of the date of this annual report.Brazilian Steel Instute (IABR). In addition, we use our subsidiaries CSN LLC and Lusosider also as sales channels for our flat steel products in the United States and in Europe, with 8%which accounted for approximately 22% of our total sales in 2012.2015. Direct exportsexports accounted for 3%4% of our total sales in 2012.2015. In 2012 we acquired SWT, a long steel producer in Germany with annual production capacity of approximately 1.1 million tons of steel profiles, strengthening our steel products mix and geographical diversification. In 2012,2015, SWT accounted for 12%15% of our total sales.
18
Table Of Contents
Strategies Our goal is to increase value for our shareholders by further benefiting from our competitive cost advantages and quality of product portfolio, maintaining our position as one of the world’s lowest-cost steel producers, becomingincreasing our relevance as an important iron ore global player, developingincreasing market share and size of our cement business and optimizing our infrastructure assets (including ports, railways and power generating plants). to enable high integration, quality product and low costs. To achieve this goalthese goals, we developed specific strategies for each of our business segments, as described below. Steel The strategy for our steel business involves: ü· A focus on the domestic market, in which we have historically recorded higher profit margins and increased competitiveness, by expanding ourincreasing market share in the flat steelssteel segment and entering in the Brazilian long steel market;
ü· ConstantAn emphasis on high margin coated steel products, such as galvanized, galvalume, pre-painted and tin plate;
·Geographical diversification through our flat and long steel facilities abroad. We also intend to maintain and diversify our exports, focused on high quality products such as coated steels; ·The constant pursuit of operational excellence, by developing and implementing cost reduction projects (e.g. pellet plant and energy efficiency) and process review programs (e.g. internal logistic optimization, inventory reduction, project development and implementation disciplines)discipline); üEmphasis on high value-added steel products, such as galvanized, pre-painted and tin-coated steel;
ü· Exploring marketing and commercial synergies by using our flat steel distribution network and product portfolio to accelerate entrance into the domestic long steel market; and
Table of contents ü· Increase market share by expanding ourIncreasing customized services and distribution abilities through our expanding distribution network.
For information on planned investments relating to our steel activities, see “Item 4D. Property, Plant and Equipment – Capital Expenditures – Planned Investments”Investments.” Mining In order to strengthen our position in the iron ore market, we plan to expandinvest in our mining assets, Casa de Pedrasuch as Congonhas Minérios, to enable low operational costs and Namisa, and search for investment opportunities, primarily in mines in operation or in an advanced stage of development.long term growth opportunities. In the coming years, we expect to reach an annual salesshipment level of approximately 89over 60 mtpy of iron ore products, including third party purchases,products, by increasing mine capacity inat Casa de Pedra and Namisaother mines, thereby strengthening our position as an important playeralong with developing export services for third party producers. Considering the current pricing and global iron ore competitive scenario, we will focus on exporting quality iron ore with low cost, guaranteeing participation in the iron ore worldwideseaborne market. To sustain this growth, we willplan to increase capacity in TECAR, our solid bulks terminal inat Itaguai Port, to 84 mtpy. We are also studying seaborne shipping opportunities, focused on increasing our competitiveness in the Asian market.70 mtpy. In order to maximize the profitability of our product portfolio, we will also plan to focus on pellet andincreasing our output of high quality pellet-feed, by using Itabirito’s deposits and investing with strategic partners and clients in providing pellet capacity.feed to pellet producers. For information on planned investments relating to our mining activities, see “Item 4D. Property, Plant and Equipment – Capital Expenditures – Planned Investments”. Logistics We expect to take advantage of and expand our current logistics capabilities, including our integrated infrastructure operations of railways and ports. We intend to continue to improve the delivery of our products in the domestic market (mainly steel and cement) by implementing low cost measures and improving our efficiency through integration and increase in the use of rail transportation, and by providing more distribution centers to reach end clients. In addition to investments in TECAR, we will strengthen Sepetibaexpanded the TECON our container terminal at Itaguaí Port in order2014. The project enables us to accommodate larger ships,operate large vessels simultaneously, increasing itsTECON’s capacity and competitiveness by adding services to develop client loyalty.
440,000 containers. Table Of Contents
In terms of railways, we planthe Transnordestina Logística project is being developed to continue the implementation of our Nova Transnordestina project and explore itsa logistic potential through terminals and regional cargo,, focusing on iron ore, agricultural commodities, gypsum and fuel. We also plan to invest in increasing our efficiency and capacity in the south of Brazil through our interest in MRS. We intendOn September 20, 2013 we entered into an investment agreement with our partners in TLSA, Valec Engenharia, Construções e Ferrovias S.A. and Fundo de Desenvolvimento do Nordeste – FDNE, two Brazilian federal government entities focused on infrastructure and the development of the northeastern region, to continue to improveimplement the deliverypartial spin-off of our productsTLSA. The operation was part of a business reorganization and resulted in the domestic market (mainly steelsegregation of the assets of the Northeastern railway system into two systems: (i) Railway System I, operated by FTL, comprising the stretches between the cities of São Luís – Mucuripe, Arrojado – Recife, Itabaiana – Cabedelo, Paula Cavalcante – Macau and cement),Propiá – Jorge Lins and (ii) the Railway System II, operated by TLSA, comprising the stretches between Missão Velha – Salgueiro, Salgueiro – Trindade, Trindade – Eliseu Martins, Salgueiro – Porto de Suape and Missão Velha – Porto de Pecém.
As a result of the partial spin-off and the subsequent entry into effect of the new shareholders’ agreement, control of TLSA is now shared with low costother shareholders, who have veto rights over certain important corporate decisions. As a result, we ceased to consolidate TLSA and efficiency by integrating and increasingbegan recognizing it inaccordance with the useequity accounting method. See “Item 4B. Business—Our Logistics Segment—Railways—Northeastern Railway System.”
Table of rail transportation, and by providing more distribution centers.contents Cement Our cement business strategy involves the utilization of the limestone reserves in our Arcos mine and the slag generated by CSN’sour blast furnaces in ourat Volta Redonda. The first cement plant in Volta Redonda,grinding mill was inaugurated in 2009, with capacity to produce 2.42.3 million tons per year. In 2011, CSNwe began producing clinker in the Arcos plant with the aim of reducing itsenabling lower production costs. We are evaluating other organic growth initiativesintend to expand our annualcement production capacity to 5.45.3 million tons in orderper year over the next few years. We plan to captureachieve this goal by adding 3.0 million tons per year of capacity through the strong growth expected in construction of three new housing unitsgrinding mills and infrastructure projects.the construction of a new clinker kiln in Arcos. During 2015, we inaugurated two new grinding mills, reaching 4.3 million tons of capacity. For information on planned investments relating to our cement activities, see “Item 4D. Property, Plant and Equipment – Capital Expenditures – Planned Investments”. Investments.” Additional Investments In addition to the currently planned investments and capital expenditures, we continue to consider possible acquisitions or divestments, joint venturescontrolled entities and brownfield or greenfield projects to increase or complementimprove our steel, cement and mining cost competitiveness and production, andalong with our logistics capabilities, logistics infrastructure and energy generation. Our Steel Segment We produce carbon steel, which is the world’s most widely produced type of steel, representing the vast bulk of global consumption. From carbon steel, we sell a variety of products, both domestically and abroad, to manufacturers in several industries.
Table Of Contents
Flat Steel The following chart reflects our flat steel production cycle in general terms.
Table of contents Our Presidente Vargas Steelworks produces flat steel products — slabs, hot-rolled, cold-rolled, galvanized and tin mill products. For further information on our production process, see “—ProductProduction Process.” Slabs Slabs are semi-finished products used for processing hot-rolled, cold-rolled or coated coils and sheet products. We are able to produce continuously cast slabs with a standard thickness of 250 millimeters, widths ranging from 830 to 1,600 millimeters and lengths ranging from 5,250 to 10,500 millimeters. We produce high, medium and low carbon slabs, as well as micro-alloyed, ultra-low-carbon and interstitial free slabs. The slabs are then slitted and finished, generating blooms which are delivered to the long products plant. Hot-Rolled Products Hot-rolled products include heavy and light-gauge hot-rolled coils and sheets. A heavy gauge hot-rolled product, as defined by Brazilian standards, is a flat-rolled steel coil or sheet with a minimum thickness of 5.01 millimeters. We are able to provide coils of heavy gauge hot-rolled sheet having a maximum thickness of 12.70 millimeters used to manufacture automobile parts, pipes, mechanical constructionstructural beams and other construction products. We produce light gauge hot-rolled coils and sheets with a minimum thickness of 1.20 millimeters, which are used for welded pipe and tubing, automobile parts, gas containers, compressor bodies and light cold-formed shapes, channels and profiles for the construction industry.
Cold-Rolled Products Cold-rolled products include cold-rolled coils and sheets. A cold-rolled product, as defined by Brazilian standards, is a flat cold-rolled steel coil or sheet with thickness ranging from 0.30 millimeters to 3.00 millimeters. Compared to hot-rolled products, cold-rolledmillimeters.Cold-rolled products have more uniform thickness and better surface quality when compared to hot-rolled products and their main applications are used in applications such as automotive bodies,parts, home appliances and construction. In addition, cold-rolledproducts serve as the base for galvanized and tin mill products. We supply cold-rolled coils in thicknesses of between 0.30 millimeters and 2.99 millimeters.
Table Of Contentsof contents Galvanized Products Galvanized products are comprised of flat-rolled steel coated on one or both sides with zinc or a zinc-based alloy applied by either a hot-dip or an electrolytic process. We use the hot-dip process, which is approximately 20% less expensive than the electrolytic process. Galvanizing is one of the most effective and low-cost processes used to protect steel against corrosion caused by exposure to water and the atmosphere. Galvanized products are highly versatile and can be used to manufacture a broad range of products, such as: · bodies for automobiles, trucks and buses;bus bodies; · manufactured products for the construction industry, such as panels for roofing and siding, dry wall and roofing support frames, doors, windows, fences and light structural components; · air ducts and parts for hot air, ventilation and cooling systems; · culverts, garbage containers and other receptacles; · storage tanks, grain bins and agricultural equipment; · panels and sign panels; and · pre-painted parts. Galvanized sheets, both painted and bare, are also frequently used for gutters and downspouts, outdoor and indoor cabinets, all kinds of home appliances and similar applications. We produce galvanized sheets and coils in continuous hot-dip processing lines, with thickness ranging from 0.30 millimeters to 3.00 millimeters. The continuous process results in products with highly adherent and uniform zinc coatings capable of being processed in nearly all kinds of bending and heavyforming machinery. In addition to standard galvanized products, weWe produceGalvanew®, in addition to the standard galvanized steel thatproducts. This product is subject to a specialproduced by an additional annealing process followingcycle just after the zinc hot-dip coating process. This annealing process causes iron to diffuse from the base steel into the zinc coating. The resulting iron-zinc alloy coating allows better welding and paint performance. The combination of these qualities makes ourGalvanew® product particularly well suited for manufacturing automobile and home appliance parts including high gloss exposed parts.
At CSN Paraná, one of our branches, we produce galvalume,Galvalume®, a cold-rolled materialcontinuous Al-Zn coated with a zinc-aluminum alloy. Thematerial. Although the production process is similar to the hot-dip galvanized coating, and galvalumeGalvalume® has at least twice the corrosion resistance of standard galvanized steel. GalvalumeGalvalume® is primarily used in outdoor construction applications that may be exposed to severe acid corrosion, like marine uses. The value added from the galvanizing process permits us to price our galvanized products with a higher profit margin. Our management believes that our expertise in value-added galvanized products presentpresents one of our best opportunities for profitable growth because of the anticipated increase in Brazilian demand for such high margin products. Through our branch CSN Paraná, we also produce pre-painted flat steel, which is manufactured in a continuous coatingpainting line. In this production line, a layer of resin-based paint in a choice of colors is deposited over either cold-rolled or galvanized base materials. Pre-painted material is a higher value-added product used primarily in the construction and home appliance markets.
Tin Mill Products Tin mill products consist of flat-rolled low-carbon steel coils or sheets with, as defined by Brazilian standards, a maximum thickness of 0.45 millimeters, coated or uncoated. Coatings of tin or chromium are applied by electrolytic process. Coating costs place tin mill products among the highest priced products that we sell. The added value fromthefrom the coating process permits us to price our tin mill products with a higher profit margin. There are four types of tin mill products, all produced by us in coil and sheet forms:
Table Of Contents
· Tin plate - coated on one or both sides with a thin metallic tin layer plus a chromium oxide layer, covered with a protective oil film;
Table of contents · Tin free steel - coated on both sides with a very thin metallic chromium layer plus a chromium oxide layer, covered with a protective oil film; · Low tin coated steel - coated on both sides with a thin metallic tin layer plus a thicker chromium oxide layer, covered with a protective oil film; and · Black plate - uncoated product used as the starting material for the coated tin mill products. Tin mill products are primarily used to make cans and other containers. With six electrolytic coating lines, we are one of the biggest producers of tin mill products in the world and the sole producer of coated tin mill products in Brazil. Production Process The main raw materials used in flat production in an integrated steelworks are iron ore, coal,ores, coals, coke, and fluxes likesuch as limestone and dolomite. The iron ore consumed at the Presidente Vargas Steelworks is extracted, crushed, classified, screened (treatment process) and transported by railway from our Casa de Pedra mine, located in the city of Congonhas, in the State of Minas Gerais, 328 km away from the Presidente Vargas Steelworks. The high quality ores mined and sized at Casa de Pedra, with an iron content of approximately 60%, and theirits low extraction costs are major contributors to our low steel production costs. We import all the coalhard coking coals required for coke production because Brazil lacksand PCI coals for the blast furnace process, due to the lack of hard coking and PCI coals with the appropriate quality in Brazil. The hard coking coals. The coal iscoals are then charged in coke batteries to produce coke through a distillation process. See “—Raw Materials and Suppliers—Raw Materials and Energy Requirements.” This coal distillation process also produces coke oven gas as a byproduct, which we use as a main source of fuel for our thermoelectric co-generation power plant. After being screened, coke is transported to blast furnaces, where it is used as a combustion source and also as a component for transformingto transform iron ore into pig iron.to hot metal. In 2012,2015, we produced approximately 67%41.6% of our coke needs, and imported the balance, compared to 62% in 2011.remaining coke was imported. At sintering plants, fine-sized iron ore and coke breeze or other fine-sized solid fuels are mixed with fluxes (limestone and dolomite) to produce sinter. The sinter, lump iron ore, iron ore pellets (which are 100% acquired in the domestic market), fluxing materials and coke are then loaded into our two operational blast furnaces for smelting. We operate a pulverized coal injection facility, or PCI, facility, which injectsallows to inject low-cost pulverized coalcoals directly into the blast furnaces, as a substitute forreplacing approximately one-third of the total coke otherwise required.demand. The iron ore isand iron ore pellets are reduced to pig iron through successive chemical reactions with carbon monoxide (from the coke and PCI) inPCI coal) at the blast furnaces, which operate 24 hours a day. The iron and iron ore ispellets are gradually reduced, then melts and flows downward. Impurities are separated from the ironhot metal to form a liquid slag with the loaded fluxes (limestone and dolomite). From time to time, white-hothot metal (white-hot liquid ironiron) and slag are drawn offdrained from the bottom of the furnace. Slag (containing melted impurities) is granulated and used to produce cement. The molten pig ironhot metal is transported to the steelmaking shop by 350-ton capacity torpedo cars and charged in basic oxygen furnaces together with scrap and fluxes. InAt the basic oxygen furnaces, oxygen is blown onto the liquid burden to oxidize its remaining impurities and to lower its carbon content, thus producing liquid steel. The molten steel is conveyed from the basic oxygen furnaces to the secondary refining equipment (degasser, ladle furnace and Argon Stirring Station)stirring station). After adjusting the chemical composition, the molten steel is transferred to the continuous casting machines from which crude steel (i.e., rectangular shaped slabs) is produced. A portion of the slab products iscan be sold directly in the export market.
Table Of Contents
In the hot rolling process, reheated slabs from the continuous casting machines are fed into hot strip mills to reduce the thickness of the slabs from 250 millimeters to a range of between 1.2 and 12.7 millimeters. At the end of the hot strip mill, the long, thin steel strip from each slab is coiled and conveyed to a cooling yard. Some hot-rolled coils are dispatched directly to customers in the as-rolled condition. Others are further processed inat the pickling line,lines, in a hydrochloric bath, to remove surface oxides and improve surface quality. After pickling, the hot-rolled coils selected to produce thinner materials are sent to be rolled inat cold strip mills. CSN has three cold strip mills, one of which was revamped in September 2011, adding 150,000 tons per year to CSN’s cold rolling capacity. The better surface characteristics of cold-rolled products enhance their value to customers when compared to hot-rolled products. Additional processing related to cold-rolling may further improve surface quality. Following cold-rolling, coils may be annealed, coated (by a hot dip galvanizing or electrolytic tinning process) and painted, to enhance medium-and long-term anti-corrosion performance and also to add characteristics that will broaden the range of steel utilization. Coated steel products have higher profit margins than bare steel products. Of our coated steel products, tin mill and galvanized products are our highest margin products.
Table of contents Steel plant equipment regularly undergoesundergo scheduled maintenance shutdowns. Typically the rolling mills and coating lines are maintained on a weekly or monthly basis whereas the blast furnaces and other special equipment are scheduled for routine maintenance on a semi-annual or annual basis. Our business encompasses operationsoperational and commercial activities. Our operations are undertaken by our production sector, which is composed of the following two units: · The operationsoperational unit - responsible for steel production operations, repair shops, in-plant railroad,railway, and process development at our Presidente Vargas Steelworks; and · The support unit - responsible for production planning, management of product stockyards, energy and utility facilities and work force safety assistance at the Presidente Vargas Steelworks. The production sector is also responsible for environment and quality consultancy, new product development, capital investment implementation for steel production and processing, and the supervision of CSN Porto Real’s and CSN Paraná’s operations. Quality Management ProgramSystem We practice Total Quality Management, a set of techniques that have been adopted by many leading companies in our industry. We also maintain a Quality Management System that has beenis certified to be in compliancecomply with the ISO 9001 standards set forth by the International Standardization Organization or ISO. In March 1993, we were awarded the ISO 9002 certificate of compliance for the manufacture of several of our products. In April 1996, we were awarded the ISO 9001 certificate of compliance which replaced ISO 9002standard and included the element of “design” in its scope. In April 1998, we were awarded certification of compliance to QS 9000 standards, requirements specific to the automotive industry. Over the years theindustry’s Technical Specification ISO/TS 16949 in June 2015. ISO 9001 certificate has been maintained and renewed, with the most recent renewal to the ISO 9001:2008 version awarded in August 2011,is for the design and manufacture of slabs, blooms, billets, hot rolled flats,flat, pickled and oiled, cold rolled and galvanized steel, tin mill products and long steel products and ISO/TS 16949:2009, third edition, for the manufacture of hot-rolled flat , pickled and oiled steel products, cold rolled, galvanized steel products and tin mill products. In June 2004, we were also awarded the automotive industry’s Technical Specification ISO/TS 16949, for the design and manufacture of hot-rolled, pickled and oiled, cold-rolled and galvanized steel products. We also maintain a certification attesting that products which replacedfurnished by our Araucária plant in the QS 9000 standards. The most recent renewalstate of Paraná, Brazil, to the ISO/TS 16949:2009, third edition, was awardedelectrical and electronic equipment industries are in September 2011. Some important automotive companies, like FIAT, General Motorsconformity with Directive 2011/65/EU of the European Parliament on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and Ford, require their suppliers to satisfy the ISO/TS 16949 standards.electronic equipment – RoHS. Production Output The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the annual production of crude steel within Brazil and by us and the percentage of Brazilian production attributable to us.us: | | | | | | CSN % of | Crude Steel Production | | | | | | | | | (In millions of tons) | | | 2012 | | 34.7 | | 4.8 | | 13.8% | 2011 | | 35.2 | | 4.9 | | 13.9% | 2010 | | 32.8 | | 4.9 | | 14.9% | 2009 | | 26.5 | | 4.4 | | 16.6% | 2008 | | 33.7 | | 5.0 | | 14.8% | _______________ | Source: Brazilian Steel Institute (Instituto Aço Brasil), or IABr. |
Crude Steel Production | Brazil | | CSN | | CSN % of Brazil | | (In millions of tons) | 2015 | 33.2 | | 4.2 | | 12.7% | 2014 | 33.9 | | 4.5 | | 13.3% | 2013 | 34.2 | | 4.5 | | 13.2% | 2012 | 34.7 | | 4.8 | | 13.8% | 2011 | 35.2 | | 4.9 | | 13.9% | _______________ | Source: Brazilian Steel Institute (Instituto Aço Brasil), or IABr. |
Table Of Contents
The following table contains some of our operating statistics for the periods indicated.indicated: Certain Operating Statistics |
| | | | | | | | 2012 |
| 2011 |
| 2010 | | | (In millions of tons) |
| (In millions of tons) |
| (In millions of tons) | Production of: | | | | | | | Iron Ore * | | 19.8 | | 20.1 | | 21.6 | Molten Steel | | 5.0 | | 5.0 | | 5.0 | Crude Steel | | 4.9 | | 4.9 | | 4.9 | Hot-Rolled Coils and Sheets | | 4.8 | | 4.8 | | 5.0 | Cold-Rolled Coils and Sheets | | 2.6 | | 2.4 | | 2.5 | Galvanized Products | | 1.2 | | 1.4 | | 1.1 | Tin Mill Products | | 0.5 | | 0.7 | | 0.7 | Consumption of Coal for Coke Batteries | | 1.9 | | 2.1 | | 2.2 | Consumption of Coal for PCI | | 0.7 | | 0.6 | | 0.7 | *Casa de Pedra | | | | | | |
Table of contents Certain Operating Statistics | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | (In millions of tons) | Production of: | | | | | | Molten Steel | 4.4 | | 4.6 | | 4.6 | Crude Steel | 4.2 | | 4.5 | | 4.5 | Hot-Rolled Coils and Sheets | 4.3 | | 4.8 | | 5 | Cold-Rolled Coils and Sheets | 2.5 | | 2.5 | | 2.7 | Galvanized Products | 1.4 | | 1.6 | | 1.5 | Tin Mill Products | 0.6 | | 0.6 | | 0.7 | Consumption of Coal for Coke Batteries | 1.3 | | 1.6 | | 1.5 | Consumption of Coal for PCI | 0.5 | | 0.6 | | 0.6 | | | | | | |
Raw Materials and Suppliers The main raw materials we use in our integrated steel mill include iron ore, coke, coal (from which we make coke), limestone, dolomite, aluminum, tin and zinc. In addition, our production operations consume water, gases, electricity and ancillary materials.
Raw Materials and Energy Requirements In 2010, prices of our main raw materials increased due to larger post-crisis demand and a strengthening of the steel industry worldwide.
In the first half of 2011, prices of the main raw materials used by CSN continuously increased due to unbalanced global supply and demand. In the second half of 2011, prices decreased, mainly due to the worsening of the European crisis. In the first nine months of 2012, prices of the main raw materials used by CSN continued to fall due to the global crisis in the steel market caused mainly by the decline in China’s growth rates and the European crisis. In the fourth quarter of 2012, prices increased, mainly due to the restocking of Chinese mills in preparation for the winter and Chinese holidays. In 2013, 2014 and 2015, coal and coke prices continued decreasing. These commodity segments are highly concentrated in the hands of a few global players and there can be no assurance that price increases will not be imposed on steel producers in the future. Iron Ore We are able to obtain allthe majority of our iron ore requirements from our Casa de Pedra mineand Engenho mines located in the State of Minas Gerais. The only iron ore product which we buy from third parties is pellet. For a description of our iron ore segment see “– Our Mining Segment.”
Table Of Contents
Coal In 2012,2015, our metallurgical coal consumption totaled 2.61.75 million tons. Metallurgical coal includes coking coal and PCI coal, which is a lower grade coal injected into the blast furnaces, in a pulverized form, to reduce coke consumption. The PCI system reduces CSN’s need for imported coke, and since it is a lower cost compared to imported coke, thus reducing production costs. In 2012, we used 717,710The total PCI coal consumption in 2015 totaled 0.46 million tons, of imported PCI coal.all imported. The sources of the hard coking coal consumed in our plants in 20122015 were as follows: USA (55%(60.0%), Australia (37%(35.0%) and Canada (8%(5.0%). It is important to mention that Australia’s share increased when compared to 2011, due to its recovery in supply, which was strongly affected by flooding in 2011. Our sources of PCI Coal, the sources were: and for PCI: Russia (50%(55.0%), Australia (44%) and Venezuela (6%(45.0%). In 2012,
During 2015, CSN’s coking coal and PCI coal costs in US dollar decreased significantly when compared to 2011.2014 and 2013. The quarterly benchmark price for metallurgical coal started to decline in the first quarter of 2012, endingbegan its drop and ended the year at its lowest levelprice (US$89.00) since 2010, a decrease of US$26.00 compared with the quarterly pricing mechanism began in the secondfirst quarter of 2010.2015. The decline in metallurgical coal price reflecteddeals for the slowdown in demand due tofirst quarter of 2015 were US$2.00/mt lower than for the financial crisis in Europe and weaker economic growth in China.fourth quarter of 2014. Theprevious lowest settlement amount had been for the fiscal year 2009, when it was priced at US$129.00/mt.
Table of contents
Coke In 2012,2015, in addition to the approximately 1.30.94 million tons of coke we produced, we also consumed 676,6811.32 million tons of coke bought from third parties in China India and Colombia, an increasea decrease of 7.2%21.66% as compared to our consumption in 2011.2014. The demand fordecrease in coke has been increasing significantly since 2002 because China, a major playerproduction throughout 2015 derives from an onogoing revamp project in our coke plants, which will last through the sea-borne trade, has increased its internal consumption and adopted restrictive export quotas. In addition, India has become a major consumer of coke, considerably increasing its imports in the pastnext few years. Due to logistical reasons, China supplies most of India’s coke and this increase in consumption tightened even more the worldwide supply-demand balance of metallurgical coke. During 2012, Chinese coke prices remained flat until October. In the fourth quarter, producers were fully stocked in China, leading to a reduction in demand and pushing prices down significantly.
Limestone and Dolomite Our Bocaina mine is located in Arcos, in the State of Minas Gerais, and has been supplying, since the early '70s,1970s, limestone (calcium carbonate) and dolomite (dolomitic limestone) to our Presidente Vargas Steelworks in Volta Redonda. These products are used in the process of sintering and calcination. Arcos has one of the biggestlargest and besthighest quality reserves of limestone in the world, which is used in the production of various products, including clinker and cement. The annual production of limestone and dolomite for our steelworks is approximately 2.42.5 million tons. The main products obtained from limestone and dolomite that are transferred to our steelworks in Volta Redonda are: · Limestone and dolomite calcination: with a granulometry between 32 and 76 mm, they are used in the lime plant in Volta Redonda to produce calcitic and dolomitic lime, for further use in the steelmaking process and sintering. At the steelworks, lime is used for chemical controlling of liquid slag, in order to preserve the refractory of the converters and assist in the stabilization of the chemical reactions that occur during the steel manufacturing process. During sintering, the purpose of lime is to increase the performance of this process and the final quality of the sinter that is produced. · Limestone and dolomite fines for sintering: used in the production of “sinter”, in our steelworks. The sinter is composed ofsintering process mixes and heats together with fine ores, solid fuel and flux, which enable semi-melting and sintering ore.producing a highly reactive granulated burden. The sinter is used in blast furnaces as athe main source of iron for the production of pig iron. Beginning in 2009,2011, with our entry into the start-up of clinker plant to produce cement market,in Volta Redonda, the mine in Arcos also became responsible for supplying limestone for cement manufacturing in Volta Redonda.
Table Of Contents
Aluminum, Zinc and Tin Aluminum is mostly used for steelmaking. Zinc and tin are important raw materials used in the production of certain higher-value steel products, such as galvanized and tin plate, respectively. We typically purchase aluminum, zinc and tin from third-party domestic suppliers under one year contracts. Specifically in relation to tin, we purchase part of our demand from CSN’s subsidiary ERSA (Estanho de Rondônia S.A).ERSA. We maintain approximately 26, 2715, 16 and 14036 days inventory of tin, aluminum and zinc, respectively, at the Presidente Vargas Steelworks. Other Raw Materials In our production of steel, we consume, on an annual basis, significant amounts of spare parts, refractory bricks and lubricants, which are generally purchased from domestic suppliers.
Table of contents We also consume significant amounts of oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen, argon and other gases at the Presidente Vargas Steelworks. These gases are supplied by a third-party under a long-term contract from its gas production facilities located on the Presidente Vargas Steelworks site. In 2012,2015, we used 749,244698,700 tons of oxygen to produce 4.84.2 million tons of crude steel. Water Large amounts of water are also required in the production of steel. Water serves as a solvent, a catalyst and a cleaning agent. It is also used to cool, to carry away waste, to help produce and distribute heat and power, and to dilute liquids. Our source of water is the Paraíba do Sul River, which runs through the city of Volta Redonda. Over 85%92% of the water used in the steelmaking process is recirculated and the balance, after careful processing, is returned to the Paraíba do Sul River. Since March 2003, the Brazilian government has imposed a monthly tax for our use of water from the Paraíba do Sul River, based on an annual fee of approximately R$2.50.705 million. Electricity Steelmaking also requires significant amounts of electricity to power rolling mills, production lines, hot metal processing, coking plants and auxiliary units. In 2012,2015, our Presidente Vargas Steelworks consumed approximately 2.953.01 million MWh of electric energy or 608 kilowatt hours per ton of crude steel. This level means we are one of the largest consumers of electricity in Brazil, accounting for approximately 8% of the overall consumption of electricity in the State of Rio de Janeiro.energy. Our main source of electricity is our 238 MW thermoelectric co-generation power plant at the Presidente Vargas Steelworks, besideswhich is fueled by the gases from the steel production process, with 235.2 MW of installed capacity. In addition, we have a 29.5% interest in the Itá Hydroelectric Power Plant in Santa Catarina, through a 48.75% equity interest in ITASA, and a 17.9% interest in the Igarapava hydroelectric facilities,Hydroelectric Power Plant in Minas Gerais, from which we have ensured energy take of 167 MW on average and 23 MW average, respectively. Those three assets give CSN an average generation capacity of 425 MW, supplying the group’s total demand for power. In addition, CSN is installing2014, we installed a new turbine generator at the Presidente Vargas Steelworks, which will addadded 21 MW to our existing installed capacity with start-up planned for 2013.capacity. This turbine will beis located near our Blast Furnace No. 3, using the outlet gases from the iron making process to generate energy. Natural Gas In addition to electricity, we consume natural gas, mainly in our hot strip mill. Companhia Estadual de Gás do Rio de Janeiro S.A., or CEG Rio, which was privatized in 1997, is currently our major source of natural gas. Variations in the supply of gas can affect the level of steel production. We have not experienced any significant stoppages of production due to a shortage of natural gas. We also purchase fuel oil from Petrobras and Raízen. In 2012,2015, the Presidente Vargas Steelworks consumed 418,284 dam489 million m3 of natural gas. The market for natural gas is strongly correlated with the electricity market. Brazilian electricity generation is based principally on hydroelectric power, itself dependent on the level of Brazil’s reservoirs. As a contingency against low levels of rainfall, there are several thermoelectric power plants which use natural gas. Due to low levels of rainfall in 2012,2013 and 2014, reservoirs reached their lowest level in the past ten years; consequently the Brazilian Electricity System Operator (Operador(Operador Nacional do Sistema Elétrico)trico), or ONS, increased the utilization of thermoelectric generation.generation. Diesel Oil In mid-October 2006 and July 2008, we entered into agreements with Companhia Brasileira de Petróleo Ipiranga, or Ipiranga, to receive diesel oil in order to supply our equipment in our mining plants in the state of MinasGerais,Minas Gerais, which provide the iron ore, dolomite and limestone used in our steel plant in Volta Redonda. In 2012,2015, our consumption totaled 63,02859,526 kiloliters of diesel oil, used to produce 25.713 million tons of iron ore, for which we paid US$49.8 33.5 million or R$111.6 million, until November. InDecember, 2015 we consumed 3.9 kiloliters, used to produce 2.1 million tons of iron ore, for which we paid US$2.0 million or R$7.5 million.
Table Of Contentsof contents Suppliers We acquire the inputs necessary for the production of our products in Brazil and abroad, with aluminum, zinc, tin, spare parts, refractory bricks, lubricants, oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen and argon being the main inputs acquired in Brazil. Coal and coke are the only inputs acquired abroad. In 2015 we consumed 262,000 tons of third party slabs. Our main raw materials suppliers are set forth below:
|
|
| Main Suppliers | | Raw Material | Main Suppliers
| | | Açominas and CSA | | Slabs | BHP Billiton, Jim Walter Resources, Alpha Natural Resources,Walters Energy, Rio Tinto Coal, Alpha Resources, Carbo One Limited and MarubeniTeck Coal
| | Coal | CI Milpa, ThyssenKrupp, Sinochen and ThyssenKruppCoeclerici | | Coke | RBAIbrame, Latasa, Chanceller and AlubarAlumbras
| | Aluminum | Votorantim Metais (1) | | Zinc | White Solder, CoopertradingERSA, Melt Metais and ERSA Mineração Taboca | | Tin | Sotreq, Gevisa, Continental, Distribuidora Cummins, Correias Mercurio, Deva VeiculosVeyanceMetso, Maxbelt and MTU do BrasilMason | | Spare parts | Magnesita, RHI Vesuvius and Saint Gobain | | Refractory bricks | Daido, Ipiranga and Quaker BR Distribuidora
| | Lubricants | ___________ | | | (1) We depend on Votorantim Metais as it is the only supplier of zinc in Brazil |
Facilities
Flat Steel Mill The Presidente Vargas Steelworks, located in the city of Volta Redonda, in the State of Rio de Janeiro, began operating in 1946. It is an integrated facility covering approximately 4.0 square km and containing five coke batteries (three of which are currently in operation), three sinter plants, two blast furnaces, a basic oxygen furnace steel shop, or BOF shop, with three converters, three continuous casting units, one hot strip mill, three cold strip mills, two continuous pickling lines, one continuous annealing line, 28 batch annealing furnaces, three continuous galvanizing lines, four continuous annealing lines exclusively for tin mill products and six electrolytic tinning lines. At the end of 2015, the Company decided to idle Blast Furnace No. 2 operation as from 2016, decreasing our annual production capacity of steel at the Presidente Vargas Steelworks by 28% from 5.4 million tons to 3.9 million tons. Our major operational units and corresponding effective capacities as of December 31, 2012,2015, including CSN LLC and Lusosider, are set forth in the following chart: Effective Capacity
Table of contents
|
| Tons per year |
| Equipment in operation | Process: | | | | | | | | | | Process:
| | | | | Coking plant | | 1,525,000 | 1,680,000
| | 3 batteries | Sintering plant | | 6,930,0006,360,000
| | 3 machines | Blast furnace | | 5,380,000 | | 2 furnaces | BOF shop | | 5,750,000 | | 3 converters | Continuous casting | | 5,600,000 | | 3 casters | Finished Products: | | | | | Hot strip mill | | 5,100,000 | | 1 mill | Cold strip mill | | 4,700,000 | | 6 mills | Galvanizing line | | 2,095,000 | | 7 lines | Electrolytic tinning line | | 1,190,000 930,000
| | 75 lines
|
Table Of Contents
Downstream Facilities
CSN Paraná Our CSN Paraná branch produces and supplies plain regular galvanizedGalvalume® products, Galvalume® products and pre-painted steel products for the automotive, construction and home appliance industries. The plant has an annual capacity of 330,000 tons of galvanized products andGalvalume® Galvalume® products, 100,000130,000 tons of pre-painted products, which can use cold-rolled or galvanized steel as substrate, service capacity of 150,000 tons of sheets and narrow strips, and 220,000 tons of pickled hot-rolled coils in excess of the coils required for the coating process.
CSN Porto Real Our CSN Porto Real branch produces and supplies plain regular galvanized, Galvanew® products and tailored blanks mainly for the automotive industry. The plant has an annual capacity of 350,000 tons of galvanized products, including Galvanew® products, and 150,000 tons of tailored blanks, sheets and narrow strips, which can use cold-rolled or galvanized steel as a substrate. Metalic We have a 99.99% ownership interest in Cia. Metalic Nordeste, or Metalic. Metalic is one of the few two-piece steel can producers in all the Americas. It has approximately 30%12% of the packaging market for carbonated drinks in the Northeastern regionsregion of Brazil. Currently, we are Metalic’s only supplier of the steel used to make two-piece cans. The development of drawn-and-wall-ironed steel for the production of two-piece cans is an important achievement in the production process at the Presidente Vargas Steelworks.
Prada
We have a 99.99% ownership interest in Cia. Metalúrgica Prada, or Prada. Established in 1936, Prada is the largest Brazilian steel can manufacturer and has an annual production capacity of over one billion cans in its three industrial facilities: two located in the state of São Paulo and one in the state of Minas Gerais. Currently, we are the only Brazilian producer of tin plate, Prada’s main raw material, which makes Prada one of our major customers of tin plate products. Prada has important clients in the food and chemical industries, including packages of vegetables, fish, dairy products, meat, aerosols, paints and varnishes, and other business activities. On December 30, 2008, we merged one of our subsidiaries, Indústria Nacional de Aços Laminados S.A., or INAL, into Prada. INAL was a distributor of laminated steel founded in 1957 and, after the merger, it became a branch of Prada responsible for distribution of CSN and Prada’s products, or Prada Distribuição.
Table of contents Prada Distribuição is alsoone of the leaderleaders in the Brazilian distribution market for steel products with 460,000 tons per year of installed processing capacity. Prada Distribuição has twoone steel service centerscenter and fivesix distribution centers strategically located in the Southeast region Brazil. Its mainThe service center is located in the city of Mogi das Cruzes between the cities of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro. Its product mix also includes sheets, slit coils, sections, tubes, and roofing in standard or customized format, according to clients’ specifications. Prada Distribuição processes the entire range of products produced by us and services 4,000 customers annually from the civil construction, automotive and home appliances sectors, among others. Companhia Siderurgica Nacional, LLC
CSN LLC holds the assets of former Heartland Steel, a flat-rolledflat steel processing facility in Terre Haute, Indiana. This facility has an annual cold rolling production capacity of 800,000 tons of full hard cold rolled coils. Delivery capacity of cold-rolled and galvanized products are 280,000 and 315,000 tons of galvanized products.tons/year, respectively. Currently, CSN LLC is obtaining hot coilsraw materials by buying slabs from CSN and having them converted into hot coils by local steel companies or buying hot rolled coils directly from mills in the United States.States or importing from mills abroad. See “Item 4B. Government Regulation and Other Legal Matters—Anti-Dumping Proceedings—United States” for a discussion about anti-dumping issues on Brazilian hot coils exports to the United States.
Lusosider, Aços Planos, S.A. We own 99.94% of Lusosider, a producer of hot-dip galvanized products and cold-rolledflat steel processing facility located in Seixal, near Lisbon, Portugal. Lusosider produceshas the capacity to produce and sell approximately 50,000 tons of hot-rolled pickled coils, 50,000 tons of cold-rolled and 240,000 tons of galvanized products and 50,000 tons of cold-rolled per year. Its main customers include service centers and tube making industries.
CSN Distribuição
Table Of Contents
Inal Nordeste
Inal Nordeste, or INOR, is a distributor of laminates located in the Northeastern Region. INOR has aWe have two service centercenters, one located in the city of Camaçari, in the State of Bahia and one in the city of Jaboatão dos Guararapes, in the state of Pernambuco, to support sales in the Northeastern and North regions. On May 30,There is also a Distribution Center in the city of Canoas, in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, to support sales in the South region of Brazil.
Long Steel - Mills
SWT In February 2012, we acquired Stahlwerke Thuringen, or SWT, located in Unterwellenborn, Germany, which marked our entrance into the long steel market. SWT specializes in the production of profiles, including IPE (European I Beams) and HE (European Wide Flange Beams) sections, channels and UPE (Channels with Parallel Flanges) sections and steel sleepers. In total, more than 200 types of sections are produced according to different German and international standards. The following chart reflects SWT’s production cycle in general terms.
Table of contents Production Process Scrap arrives at the mill by rail or road. Two gantry cranes are used to transfer the scrap to a stockyard. Two remote-controlled diesel-hydraulically driven transfer wagons carry the recycled steel in containers, which also function as charging vessels to the melting shop. The electric arc of the DC-furnace is generated between a graphite electrode and the bottom of the furnace, which functions as the anode. This energy, supplemented by natural gas/oxygen burners, is used to convert this material into molten steel. After the smelting process, the molten metal is tapped into the ladle in a wagon, which is then positioned under the ladle furnace. The purpose of this process is to achieve the desired composition, by the addition of alloys, and the necessary final temperature of the steel. The ladle is then transported to the casting shop with the transport wagon and is elevated onto the turret that rotates it into the casting position. The tundish distributes the steel to four strands of water-cooled copper moulds that provide the desired beam blank shape. As soon as the strands pass through the moulds they undergo an intensive cooling process. After solidification is complete, the strands pass through guides which transport and straighten the strands out of the casting arc into the horizontal plane, where they are then cut into pieces of the required length with automatic flame-cutting torches. A transfer manipulator passes the beam blanks to the roller table of the rolling mill. The rolling mill provides facilities for both duo and universal rolling processes. In contrast to the continuous operation where the sections are rolled in strands arranged one after the other, in this reversing mill the section bar is run forwards and backwards in several passes through rolls that either have “grooves” or function according to the universal rolling principle. The three stand assemblies in the rolling mill include, a break down stand coupled with a cropping saw, a tandem group and a finishing group. After having passed the finishing strand, the dimensional accuracy of the rolled section is measured using laser technology. The next stage is the finishing department, where the sections, which can be up to 100m long, cool down on a walking beam cooling bed, before being straightened. The sections are then cut on a cold saw plant to lengths between 6m and 28m, as requested by customers.
Table of contents
Production Output - SWT | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | | (In thousands of tons) | Production of: | | | | Beam Blank (Crude Steel) | 794 | 844 | 813 | Long Steel (Finished Products) | 743 | 758 | 765 |
Raw Materials and Suppliers Raw Materials and Energy Requirements The main raw material we use in our long steel operation is scrap. In addition, our production operations consume electricity, natural and technical gases and ancillary materials like ferroalloys, lime, dolomite and foaming coal.
Scrap During 2011, INOR was merged into us, allowingprices for scrap continuously increased due to unbalanced supply and demand in Europe and increasing globalization of scrap trading worldwide. Prices in the European market were particularly affected. In 2013, the scrap average price decreased significantly until the middle of the year followed by a slight prices increase. In 2014 and 2015 the scrap prices decreased significantly. Our scrap consumption totaled approximately 0.9 million tons and accounted for nearly 60% of our production costs. We are able to obtain 70% of our scrap needs from within a 250 km vicinity. Ferroalloys, lime and foaming coal Because we do not own any sources of alloys, lime and foaming coal we have to buy these materials from traders. Our traders are located mostly in Europe and the materials come from different producers around the world.
Rolls We consume different types of rolls in our rolling mill, usually cast rolls which come from Germany, Italy, Slovenia and China. Graphite electrodes In the smelting shop (electric arc furnace), we use graphite electrodes with a diameter of 750mm and in the ladle furnace, we use electrodes with a diameter of 400mm. The electrodes come from Europe, Japan and China. Other raw materials In our production of steel we consume, on an annual basis, amounts of electrodes, rolls, refractory materials and materials for packaging and spare parts, which are mostly purchased from domestic suppliers. Water Large amounts of water are required in the production process. Our source of water is the Saale river, located 5 km from the plant. We use our own water station to pump water via pipelines to the plant. Electricity and Natural Gas Steelmaking also requires significant amounts of electricity and natural gas, for which we have supply contracts. Under normal conditions, we consume approximately 450 GWh of electric energy and an equal amount of natural gas.
Table of contents Suppliers
We acquire the inputs necessary for the optimizationproduction of processesour products in Germany and other countries. Our main raw materials suppliers are set forth below: Main Suppliers | Raw Material | |
| Scholz, TSR | Scrap | Verbund | Electric Energy | E.on Ruhrgas | Natural gas | RHI | Refractory | SGL, Graftec, NCK | Electrodes | Siemens, Schneider, Voith | Spare parts | Irle, Walzengießerei Coswig | Rolls |
Facilities - SWT SWT possesses a 28 km internal railway system, and the logistics infrastructure to ensure supply of scrapand delivery of finished products. Main markets served by SWT include: non-residential construction, equipment industries, engineering and transport, in Germany and neighboring countries, including Poland and the Czech Republic.
Effective Capacity - SWT |
| | Tons per year |
| Equipment in operation | Process: | | | | | EAF – Electric Arc Furnace | | 1,100,000 | | 1 furnace | Ladle Furnace | | 1,100,000 | | 1 furnace | Finished Products: | | | | | Section mill | | 1,000,000 | | 1 mill |
Volta Redonda EAF Mill
Plant Characteristics
We completed a new plant mill for production of long steel products in Volta Redonda and started assisted operations in December 2013 and 2014 we started ramping up the production process. The plant consists of a 50t electric arc steelmaking furnace, 50t ladle metallurgy, continuous casting machine for billets and a hot rolling mill for wire rod and reinforcing bar.. We expect this plant to reach up to 500,000 t/year output when fully operational, providing the domestic market with products for civil construction and high quality drawing and cold heading applications.
Steelmaking Shop Designed for an output of 400,000 t/year, this unit mainly consists of one 50t UHP, AC electric arc furnace, one 50t ladle furnace, one continuous casting machine for billets with three strands, mobile equipment and cranes, power supply, distribution facilities and and auxiliary equipment. Rolling Mill
Designed for an output of 500,000 t/year, this unit has one walking-beam reheating furnace, or RHF, a 4-stand blooming mill, a 250t hot shear, a 6-stand roughing mill, a 6-stand intermediate mill, a 6-stand pre-finishing mill, internal water cooling, a double length flying shear, a stepping cooling bed, a 500t cold shear, transfer inspection stand, bundling machine, a water-cooling section before wire finishing mill, a 10-stand high-speed wire finishing mill, a water-cooling section after wire finishing mill, a laying head, a loose coil cooling line, reforming device, bundling machine, stripper and coil handling devices.
Table of contents Production Process - Rebar and Wire-rod
Steelmaking
The process of steelmaking begins with the arrival of smelt scrap and pig iron at our facilities by wagons and trucks. After being conditioned, scrap and pig iron are delivered for scrap bucket preparation in the scrap yard. The scrap buckets are prepared based on the type of steel that will be manufactured in the steelmaking shop. The scrap bucket mixed with pig iron is, with the help of a crane, brought to the electric arc furnace. After loading, the furnace begins the melting process, which involves the creation of steel through use of electrodes, burners and oxygen injectors. In the furnace, the scrap metal becomes liquid steel after reaching the appropriate temperature and is tapped into a previously prepared ladle. During tapping, alloys are added to the liquid steel and the mixture is placed in a ladle furnace. In the ladle furnace, chemical composition corrections are made to the mixture. The ladle, containing the liquid steel is then brought to the continuous casting machine. The liquid steel is then poured into a tundish where it is cast into the molds, beginning the process of solidification and transformation of steel in billets. After being solidified, the billets are cut into particular sizes according to the intended application. Rolling Mill
The rolling mill is comprised of a blooming mill, a roughing mill, an intermediate mill, a pre-finishing mill and a wire finishing mill in order to reduce the steel thickness and make the thickness uniform. When using 250x250mm blooms cut from BOF slabs, the blooms will be moved by a chain shifting device, which has heat insulation, that brings the blooms to the delivery table in the blooming mill before they are rolled into transfer bar of 150x150mm and then cropped and divided by a 250t hot shear. Afterwards the transfer bars are sent by the heat retaining table and chain shifting device to the roughing mill. Then, in line with product requirements, for straight pieces the transfer bar will be fed into roughing mill, intermediate rolling mill and pre-finishing mills to be rolled continuously into straight thread rebar or round bar. In order to produce wires, the rolling piece leaving the pre-finishing mill will be fed into high-speed wire finishing mill where it is rolled into the desired wire coils. The production flow chart is showed below:
Table of contents Production Output Certain Operating Statistics | | | (In thousands of tons) | 2015 | 2014 | Production of: | | | Billets (Crude Steel) | 151 | 105 | Long Steel (Finished Products) | 131 | 93 |
Raw Materials and Energy Suppliers The main raw material we use in our long steel operation in Volta Redonda is scrap, in addition to pig iron. We also use blooms, which we produce at our BOF shop. In addition, our production operations consume electricity, natural and technical gases and ancillary materials like ferroalloys, lime, dolomite and foaming coal. The supply sources for these materials are the same used for our flat steel operations. See “Item 4B—Raw Materials and Suppliers.” Our Mining Segment Our mining activities are one of the largest in Brazil and are mainly driven by the exploration of one of iron ore reserves, Casa de Pedra, in the State of Minas Gerais. We sell our iron ore products mainly in Asia, Europe and Brazil with sales and marketing taking place through our principal hubs in Minas Gerais, in Brazil and Austria. Our Mines Location, Access and Operation Casa de Pedra Casa de Pedra mine is an open pit mine located in the city of Congonhas in the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil, approximately 80 km south of the city of Belo Horizonte and 360 km north of the city of
Table of contents Rio de Janeiro. The site is approximately 1,000 meters above sea level and accessible from the cities of Belo Horizonte or Congonhas through mostly paved roads. Casa de Pedra mine is a hematite-rich iron deposit of an early proterozoic banded iron formation in Brazil’s Iron Ore Quadrangle (Quadrilátero Ferrífero), which is located in the central part of the State of Minas Gerais in the Southeastern region of Brazil and has been one of the most important iron producing regions in Brazil for the last 50 years. It has been incorporated to CSN in 1941, but has been in operation since 1913. Our iron ore at Casa de Pedra is currently excavated by a fleet composed of Komatsu PC5500 and Caterpillar 6060 hydraulic shovels, wheel loaders (Caterpillar 994H, Komatsu WA1200 and LeTourneau 1850) and then hauled by a fleet of Caterpillar 793D (240 tons), Caterpillar 793F (240 tons) and Terex Unit Rig MT4400AC (240 tons). This fleet has an installed annual ROM capacity of approximately 130 million tons. Then the ore is processed in our treatment facilities, which have an installed capacity of 28 million tons of products per year. We use in Casa de Pedra electrical power provided by hydroelectric plants. Casa de Pedra mine supplies all of our iron ore needs exept pellets, producing lump ore, sinter feed and pellet feed fines with high iron content. The maps below illustrate the location of our Casa de Pedra mine:
Table of contents Engenho The Engenho mine is also an open pit mine located at the Southwestern region of the Iron Ore Quadrangle, 60 km south of the city of Belo Horizonte and is accessible from the cities of Belo Horizonte or Congonhas through mostly paved roads. The map below illustrates the location of our Engenho mine: The Engenho mine started operation in 1950. The ore in this mine is excavated by a fleet of wheel loaders (Komatsu WA470) and excavators (Komatsu PC600) and then hauled by a fleet of Mercedes-Benz Actros 4844 trucks. There is also equipment that operates in the dam and in the yard. These fleet consist of wheel loaders (Komatsu WA470 and Komatsu WA500), excavators (Komatsu PC600 and Komatsu PC350) and trucks (Mercedes-Benz Actros 4844 and Mercedes-Benz Axor 4144). Then the ore is processed in the Pires treatment facilities, which have an installed capacity of 7 million tons of products per year. We use electrical power provided by hydroelectric plants in Engenho mine and Pires Complex. Fernandinho The Fernandinho mine is located in the city of Itabirito, in the State of Minas Gerais. This city is located in the Middle-East region of the State of Minas Gerais and approximately 40 km from the city of Belo Horizonte. Fernandinho is an open pit mine and is accessible from the cities of Belo Horizonte or Itabirito through mostly paved roads. The map below illustrates the location of our Fernandinho mine:
Table of contents The Fernandinho mine also started operation in 1950. The ore in this mine is excavated by a fleet of wheel loaders (Komatsu WA470) and excavators (Komatsu PC350LC-8) and then hauled by Mercedes Bens AXOR 4144K trucks. Then the ore is processed in the Fernandinho treatment facilities, which have an installed capacity of 600 thousand tons of products per year. We use electrical power provided by hydroelectric plants in Fernandinho mine as well. The map below shows the location of Casa de Pedra, Engenho and Fernandinho Mines: Casa de Pedra and Engenho mines are now part of a company named Congonhas Minérios, which resulted from the combination of the iron ore and related logistic assets of CSN and Namisa. See “Item 5A Specific Events Affecting our Results of Operations” for more information on the transaction.
Table of contents Limestone and Dolomite Mine Our extraction and preparation of limestone and dolomite is done at our Bocaina mining facility located in the city of Arcos, in the State of Minas Gerais. The Bocaina mine is an open pit mine and it can be accessed from the cities of Belo Horizonte, located at approximately 230 km, and Volta Redonda (where the Presidente Vargas Steelworks is situated), located at approximately 462 km, through mostly paved roads. The ore in this mine is excavated by a fleet wheel loaders (Caterpillar 990, Caterpillar 980 and excavators (Komatsu PC350LC-8, Hitachi ZX470LC-5) and then hauled by a fleet of Iveco Trakker 8 x 4, Caterpillar 775, Mercedes Axor 2831 6 x 4 and Volkswagen Constellation 21330 trucks. This mining facility has an installed annual production capacity of approximately 4.0 million tons. This mining facility has sufficient limestone and dolomite reserves to adequately supply our steel production, at current levels, for 40 years. The Bocaina mine is wholly-owned by us.The maps below illustrate the location of this mine:
Tin We own a tin operation in Itapuã do Oeste, in the State of Rondônia, through our subsidiaryEstanho de Rondônia S.A. (ERSA). This facility has an installed annual production capacity of approximately 3,600 tons of tin, which we use substantially as a raw material to produce tin plate, a coated steel product. A small part of our tin production that is not used as raw material is sold to third parties; however, the results from these sales are insignificant to our consolidated results. Mineral Rights and Ownership The Mining Code and the Brazilian Federal Constitution impose requirements on mining companies relating to, among other things, the manner in which mineral deposits are exploited, the health and safety of workers, the protection and restoration of the environment, the prevention of pollution and the promotion of the health and safety of local communities where the mines are located. The Mining Code also imposes certain notifications and reporting requirements.
Table of contents We hold concessions to mine iron ore, limestone and dolomite. We purchase manganese in the local market. We own 87.52% of Congonhas Minérios mines and 100% of Bocaina and Santa Bárbara mines. In addition, each mine is an “open pit” mine. Iron ore extraction, crushing, screening and concentration are done in three different sites: Casa de Pedra mine and Pires beneficiation plant (all Congonhas Minério’s property) and Fernandinho mine, a Minerérios Nacional’s property Casa de Pedra Our mining rights for Casa de Pedra mine include the mine, a beneficiation plant, roads, a loading yard and a railway branch and are duly registered with the Brazilian Department of Mineral Production (Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineral), or DNPM. DNPM has also granted us easements in 19 mine areas located in the surrounding region, which are not currently part of Casa de Pedra mine. We believe we have obtained and are in compliance with all licenses and authorizations for our operations and projects at Casa de Pedra mine. Exploration undertaken at the Casa de Pedra mine is subject to mining lease restrictions, which were reflected in our iron ore reserve calculations. Quality requirements (chemical and physical) are the key “modifying factors” in the definition of ore reserves at Casa de Pedra and were properly accounted for by us. Mineral Reserves The following table sets forth the type of each of our mines, period of operation, projected exhaustion dates and percentage of our interest: Mine | | Type | | Operating Since | | Projected exhaustion date | | CSN % interest | | | | | | | | | | Iron: | | | | | | | | | Casa de Pedra (Congonhas, Minas Gerais) | | Open pit | | 1913 | | 2040 | | 87.52 | Engenho (Congonhas, Minas Gerais) | | Open pit | | 2007 (Start of operation by Namisa) | | 2040 | | 87.52 | Fernandinho (Itabirito, Minas Gerais) | | Open pit | | 2007 (Start of operation by Namisa) | | 2039 | | 87.52 | | | | | | | | | | Limestone and Dolomite: | | | | | | | | | Bocaina (Arcos, Minas Gerais) | | Open pit | | 1946 | | 2055 | | 100 | Tin | | | | | | | | | Santa Barbara (Itapuã do Oeste, Rondonia) | | Open pit | | 1950 | | 2054 | | 100 |
The following table sets forth our estimates of proven and probable reserves and other mineral deposits at our mines reflecting the results of reserve studies. They have been calculated in accordance with the technical definitions contained in the SEC’s Industry Guide 7, and estimates of mine life described herein are derived from such reserve estimates. The mineralized material disclosed are for the entire mines, and not just for our proportional interest in the mines. In the most recent reserve audit conducted in 2014, the losses for mine dilution and mining recovery considered were 5% each for both Casa de Pedra and Engenho mines. In 2014 we audited resources and reserves for Casa de Pedra and Engenho mines. As for Fernandinho mine we audited only resources. We do not have audited resources/reserves studies for our Bocaina mine, thus the resources/reserves presented at the table below were not audited by any third parties for that mine. As for our Santa Barbara mine we do not have reserve estimates and do not currently plan to begin campaigns to complete a study in connection with these property in light of its low materiality to our business.
Table of contents Proven and Probable Reserves1 | | | | | | | | | | Recoverable | Mine Name | Audited Reserves | Ore Tonnage3 | | | Product5 | and Location | (in millions of tons) | (in millions of tons) | Grade4 | Rock Type | (in millions of tons) | | Proven6 | Probable7 | Proven6 | Probable7 | | | | Iron: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Hematite (7%) | | Casa de Pedra(Congonhas, Minas Gerais) | 1,043 | 1,662 | 1,002 | 1,662 | 41.36% Fe | Itabirite (93%) | 1.47 | | | | | | | Hematite (3%) | | Engenho (Congonhas, Minas Gerais) | 108 | 209 | 108 | 209 | 39.48% | Itabirite (97%) | 163 | | | | | | | | | Fernandinho (Itabirito, Minas Gerais) | | | | | 40.21% | Itabirite (100%) | | Total Iron: | | | | | | | | Limestone and Dolomite: | Proven6 | Probable(7) | Proven(6) | Probable(7) | | | | | | | | | 43.84%CaO | Limestone (89.3%) | | Bocaina (Arcos, Minas Gerais) | 311 | 38 | 308 | 38 | 3.71%MgO | Dolomite (10.7%) | 261 |
(1) Reserves means the part of a mineral deposit which could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination. We do not have reserve audits for the Fernandinho mine. The reserves for the Casa de Pedra and Fernandinho mines were audited in December, 2014 and we have reduced the amount of proven reserves by our annual production since then. (2) Mineralization that has been sufficiently sampled at close enough intervals to reasonably assume continuity between samples within the area of influence. This material does not yet qualify as a reserve. (3) Represents ROM material. (4) Grade is the proportion of metal or mineral present in ore or any other host material. (5) Represents total product tonnage after mining and processing losses. (6) Means reserves for which: (i) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes; grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling; and (ii) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely and the geologic character is so well defined that size, shape, depth and mineral content of reserves are well- established. (7) Means reserves for which quantity and grade and /or quality are computed from information similar to that used for proven (measure) reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower than that for proven (measure) reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of observation. The metallurgical recovery factor is the proportion of iron in the ore delivered to the processing plant that is recovered by the metallurgical process. In 2015, the metallurgical recovery factor obtained by Casa de Pedra concentration plant was 82.0% and by the Pires plant was 65.8%. The cutoff grade is the minimum ore percentage that determines which material will be fed in the processing plant. The cutoff grade value for Casa de Pedra and Engenho mines considered in the most recent audit is 23.37%.
Table of contents The prices used in the 2014 audit for the estimation of Casa de Pedra reserves, are shown in the following table. As shown, the product price we assumed to estimate our reserves, is based on expectations of an average long term price of US$90 per ton, considering that as a reasonable price for a sustainable development of the iron ore market. | Price for the three years prior to the audit | | Long term average | | (US$/t) | | (US$/t) | | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | | Assumption | Platts 62Fe CFR N.China ($/dmt) | 169 | 130 | 135 | | 90 |
Casa de Pedra In 2012, we started a multi-year study of our iron ore resources and reserves at Casa de Pedra. The study consists of two stages the first stage of which was completed at the end of December of 2014, and the second stage of which involves more drillings and research of the deposit. The first stage includes all drillholes until October of 2013, and the second one includes all drillholes after October of 2013 by the end of the drilling campaign in December of 2014. Both stages of this new study of resources and reserves of Casa de Pedra mine are in accordance with best pratices in the iron ore market. We conducted extensive work throughout 2014 to document and classify all information related to both the current and future operations of the Casa de Pedra mine. In 2014, we hired Snowden Group, to undertake an independent analysis of the Casa de Pedra iron ore resources and reserves. Snowden carried out a full analysis of all available information and has independently validated our reported resources and reserves. Snowden accepts as appropriate the estimates regarding proven and probable reserves made by us, totaling 2,704 milliontons of iron ore (as of December 31, 2014) at a grade of 41.36% Fe and 36.46% SiO2. This new estimate of our iron ore reserves at Casa de Pedra is significantly larger than our estimate of 1,631 million tons, contained in an appraisal report prepared in 2006 by Golder Associates. Over the course of the Casa de Pedra Mine’s life we have executed different drilling campaigns and, in total, we have drilled 106,791 meters by the end of October of 2013, the first stage of the iron ore resources and reserves report. The last completed campaign started in October of 2012 and ended in November of 2014. In the course of that campaign, we drilled 15,752.25 meters that we used in this first stage of resources and reserves and we are currently extending our drilling campaign 17,539.40 meters which we will use in the second stage to increase and improve our knowledge of the iron ore deposits at Casa de Pedra. Engenho and Fernandinho In 2012 we started the same process used at Casa de Pedra to identify iron ore resources and reserves at the Engenho and iron ore resources at the Fernandinho mine in two stages. We conducted extensive work throughout 2014 to document and classify all information related to both the current and future operations of the Engenho and Fernandinho mines. In 2014, we hired Snowden Group, to conduct an independent analysis of the Engenho iron ore resources and reserves and Fernandinho resources. Snowden carried out a full analysis of all available information and has independently validated our reported resources and reserves. Snowden accepts as appropriate the estimates regarding proven and probable reserves made by us, totaling for Engenho 317 million tons of iron ore (as of December 31, 2014) at a grade of 39.48% Fe and 40.01% SiO2.
Table of contents In November 2012 we started a new drilling campaign with an additional 11,899 meters in the Engenho mine. In this first stage we use drillings performed up until the end of October 2013. For Engenho we used 4,085 meters of this last campaign totaling 9,264 meters to report the first stage estimates. In the second stage (the drilling performed up until December, 2014) we will use 7,814 meters in the Engenho mine. Production Casa de Pedra The Casa de Pedra facilities are located in the city of Congonhas, in the State of Minas Gerais. The Casa de Pedra mine is located 350 km from the Presidente Vargas Steelworks and supplies iron ore products to our steel mill, as well as for export through the reductionItaguaí Port. Casa de Pedra’s equipment fleet and treatment facilities have an installed annual ROM capacity of costs.approximately 130 million tons and 28 million tons, respectively. Pires and Fernandinho Beneficiation Plants Pires plant is the beneficiation plant of Congonhas Minérios. The plant receives material from Engenho mine (located at the northern border of the Casa de Pedra mine) and processes crude ore acquired from other companies, which along with its own ROM, generates final products such as: lump ore, small lump ore (hematitinha), sinter feed and concentrates. Fernandinho plant receives material from Fernandinho mine (located in the city of Itabirito) generates sinter feed and fines as final products. The table below sets forth production of iron ore of our mines for the last three years: | Production1 | | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | Casa de Pedra2 (Mt) | 15.4 | 21.65 | 26.24 | Grade (%) | 63.80% | 63.80% | 63.80% | Pires 2 (Mt) | 3.4 | 3.8 | 1.6 | Grade (%) | 61.60% | 62.10% | 63.90% | Fernandinho2 (Mt) | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0 | Grade (%) | 59.40% | 59.50% | - |
(1) In addition to its own production, Namisa also purchased iron ore from third parties. Third party purchase volumes totaled 11.9 million tons, 8.3 million tons and 3.1 million tons in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. (2) Production information considers 100% of the mines. | CSN Consolidated Sales1 | | 2013 | 2014 | 20152 | Consolidated Sales (Mt) | 25.67 | 28.88 | 25.67 | Consolidated Net Revenue Per Unit (US$/t) | 98 | 64 | 26.91 |
(1) Consolidated sales consider 100% of Namisa’s Sales Volume until November 2015. (2) Since December 2015, we have been considering 100% stake of Congonhas Minérios. Distribution Transportation costs are a significant component of our steel and iron ore production costs and are a factor in our price-competitiveness in the export market. Railway is the main means of transport by which we convey raw materials from our mines to the Presidente Vargas Steelworks and steel and iron ore products to ports for shipment overseas. Iron ore, limestone and dolomite from our two mines located in the State of Minas Gerais are transported by railroad to the Presidente Vargas Steelworks forprocessing into steel. The distances from our mines to the Presidente Vargas Steelworks are 328 km and 455 km. The distances from our mines to the ports are 440 km and 160 km. Imported coal and coke bought from foreign suppliers are unloaded at the port of Itaguaí, 90 km west of the city of Rio de Janeiro, and shipped 109 km by train to the Presidente Vargas Steelworks. Our finished steel products are transported by train, truck and ships to our customers throughout Brazil and abroad. Our most important local markets are the cities of São Paulo (335 km from the Presidente Vargas Steelworks), Rio de Janeiro (120 km) and Belo Horizonte (429 km).
Table of contents Until recently, Brazil’s railway system (including railcars and tracks) was principally government-owned and in need of repair, but it has now been largely privatized. In an attempt to increase the reliability of our rail transportation, we hold interests in companies that hold concessions for the main railway systems we use. For further information on our railway concessions, see “—Facilities—Railways.” We export iron ore and import coal and coke through the Itaguaí Port, in the State of Rio de Janeiro. The coal and container terminals have been operated by us since August 1997 and 1998, respectively. Our Logistics Segment Our logistics segment is comprised of railway and port facilities. Railways Southeastern Railway System MRS has a 30-year concession to operate, through the year 2026 and renewable for an equal period of 30 years, Brazil’s Southeastern railway system. As of December 31, 2015, we held 34.94% of MRS’s total capital. For more information see “Item 5E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements”. The Brazilian Southeastern railway system, with 1,643 km of track, serves the São Paulo - Rio de Janeiro - Belo Horizonte industrial triangle in Southeast Brazil, and links our mines located in the State of Minas Gerais to the ports located in the states of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro and to the steel mills of CSN, Companhia Siderúrgica Paulista or Cosipa, and Gerdau Açominas. In addition to serving other customers, the railway transports iron ore from our mines at Casa de Pedra in the State of Minas Gerais and coke and coal from Itaguaí Port in the State of Rio de Janeiro to the Presidente Vargas Steelworks and transports our exports to the ports of Itaguaí and Rio de Janeiro. The railway system connects the Presidente Vargas Steelworks to the container terminal at Itaguaí Port, which handles most of our steel exports. Our transport volumes represent approximately 19% of the Brazilian Southeastern railway system’s total volume. We are jointly and severally liable, along with the other main MRS’s shareholders, for the full payment of the outstanding amount of its indebtedness (See “Item 5E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements”). However we expect that MRS will make the lease payments through internally generated funds and proceeds from financing. Northeastern Railway System We hold interest in companies that have concessions to operate the Northeastern railway system, which operates in the states of Maranhão, Piauí, Ceará, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Alagoas and Rio Grande do Norte and connects with the region’s leading ports, offering an important competitive advantage through opportunities for intermodal transportation solutions and made-to-measure logistics projects. Resolution No. 4,042/2013 issued by the transportation regulatory agency (Agência Nacional de Transportes Terrestres), or ANTT, authorized the partial spin-off of TLSA and, as a result, the Northeastern railway system is currently divided into the Railway System I, operated by FTL, and the Railway System II, operated by TLSA. As of December 31, 2015, we held 89.79% of the capital stock of FTL, which has a concession to operate the Railway System I (which encompasses the stretches between the cities of São Luís – Mucuripe, Arrojado – Recife, Itabaiana – Cabedelo, Paula Cavalcante – Macau and Propiá – Jorge Lins) of Brazil’s Northeastern railway system until 2027, renewable for an additional 30 years. The Railway System I consists of 4,238 km of railways. As of December 31, 2015, R$98.7 million in concession payments were outstanding over the remaining 12 years of the concession.
Table of contents As of December 31, 2015, we held 56.92% of the capital stock of TLSA, which has a concession to construct and operate the Railway System II (which encompasses the stretches between Missão Velha – Salgueiro, Salgueiro – Trindade, Trindade – Eliseu Martins, Salgueiro – Porto de Suape and Missão Velha – Porto de Pecém) of Brazil’s Northeastern railway system. Once concluded, the Railway System II will have an extension of 1,753 km of tracks that will connect the interior of Northeast Brazil to Pecém and Suape Ports. This concession was granted in 1997 and recently had its original term extended until the earlier of 2057 or the date when TLSA reaches a rate of annual return of 6.75% of its total investment with monetary adjustments. For more information, see “Item 5E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.” Port Facilities Solid Bulks Terminal We operate an integrated and modern logistics structure. Part of this structure includes the operation of TECAR through a concession renewed in 2015 and expiring in 2047. TECAR is connected to road and rail systems across Southeastern Brazil and is one of the four port terminals that make up the Port of Itaguaí facilities. With a strategic location and a total area of 740,761 m², the terminal consists of a concrete molded berthing pier superposed on jacketed stilts connected to the mainland by an access bridge perpendicular to the berthing pier. Its backyard includes conveyor belts, an internal road system, bulk storage yards, a railway looping, as well as industrial and administrative facilities. Our imports of coal and coke and exports of iron ore occur through this terminal. Under the terms of the concession, we have the obligation to ship at least 3.0 million tons of bulk cargo annuallyand, as of 2020, we undertook to ship 38.4 million tons of iron ore annually. Among the approved investments, that we had previously announced was the development and expansion of the solid bulks terminal at Itaguaí, which phase 1 expansion to handle up to 45 million tons of iron ore per year was completed in 2013. For further information, see “—D. Property, Plant and Equipment—Planned Investments—Mining.” Container Terminal We own 99.99% of Sepetiba Tecon S.A., or TECON, which has a concession to operate the container terminal at Itaguaí Port for a 25-year term expiring in 2026, that is renewable for another 25 years. As of December 31, 2015, approximately U.S.$69 million of the cost of the concession remained payable over the next 11 years of the contract. For more information, see “Item 5E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.” The Itaguaí Port is located in Brazil’s Southeast Region, with all major exporting and importing areas of the states of São Paulo, Minas Gerais and Rio de Janeiro within 500 km from the port. This area represented more than 55% of the Brazilian gross domestic product, or GDP, in 2014 according to the Brazilian Geography and Statistics Institute (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística). The Brazilian Federal Port Agency has made investments in port infrastructure projects such as expanding the maritime access channel to the Itaguaí Port and increasing its depth. In addition, significant investments were made by the Brazilian federal government in adding two extra lanes to the Rio-Santos road, and in constructing the Rio de Janeiro Metropolitan Bypass, a beltway that crosses the Rio de Janeiro metropolitan area. These factors, combined with favorable natural conditions, like natural deep waters and a low urbanization rate around the port area, allow the operation of large vessels as well as highly competitive prices for all services rendered, resulting in the terminal being a major hub port in Brazil. We have invested in infrastructure and equipment at Sepetiba TECON, such as the Berth 301 Equalization, the acquisition of two new Super Post Panamax Ship-to-Shore Cranes and four new RTG cranes for yard operations, that were delivered in the first quarter of 2014. These investments, along with the previous ones, like the dredging of Sepetiba Tecon’s Berths 302/303 and access channel to ‑15.5m depth, increased TECON’s capacity from 320,000 containers (or 480,000 TEUs) to 440,000 containers (or 660,000 TEUs) per year.
Table of contents In 2015, there was a decrease in the volume of containers operated by the terminal, which handled 151,823 units, a decrease of almost 12% compared to 2014, when we handled 172,736 units. The impact, however, was mitigated because, despite the Brazilian economic crisis, the terminal was able to attract two new container service calls (Asia and Gulf of Mexico/USA). On the other hand, we exported 926,155 tons of steel products in 2015, an increase of 154% compared to 364,053 tons in 2014, breaking a 5-year record especially as a result of a combination of low domestic demand and favorable exchange rates . We also increased the operations of other cargoes, reaching a volume of 205,834 tons, compared to 110,348 tons in 2014. Our Cement Segment Our cement segment is comprised of a cement plant in Volta Redonda, in the state of Rio de Janeiro, and in Arcos, in the state of Minas Gerais. In 2015, two new crushing facilities were delivered in Arcos, increasing its annual capacity by 2.2 million tons of cement. With the implementation of the new clinker kiln in Arcos (MG), scheduled for 2016, CSN will achieve self-sufficiency in the production of this raw material. Production The cement production is held at Volta Redonda and Arcos and begins with the influx of raw materials: clinker, limestone, gypsum and slag. We consume clinker produced in our clinker plant in Arcos and eventually we import clinker to supply demand. Limestone comes from Arcos by rail. Slag is a by-product of iron and steel, produced in the blast furnace, and is also stored in the warehouse, arriving at the plant by road. CSN uses natural gypsum, from Ouricuri, in the state of Pernambuco, which arrives at the plant by truck and is stored in the warehouse. All transportation of raw materials within the plant is carried out by conveyor belts, placing inputs in scales according to a predefined formula and delivering them to the mills. There are two grinding lines and each mill has a nominal capacity of 170 tons/h. Annual plant capacity is 2.4 million tons of cement. The mill has a hydraulic roller system, which uses pressure to grind the layer of material on the turntable. Hot gas, derived from the combustion of natural gas or petroleum coke, is used in the mills to dry materials. The types of cement we produce are: CP III-40 RS, CP II-E-32 and CP II-E-40 in bagged and bulk forms. The plant has four silos, two of them with 10,000 tons of capacity and two with 5,000 tons of capacity. Cement can be shipped in bagged and bulk forms. We have two baggers with 12 filling nozzles (nominal capacity of 3,600 bags/hour) and two palletizers for bagging cement. Our Energy Segment Our energy segment is comprised of generation plants and is aimed at enabling us to maintain our self-sufficiency in energy, reducing our production cost and our exposure to fluctuations or availability of certain energy sources. Our energy related assets include: Thermoelectric Co-Generation Power Plant We completed the construction of a 235.2 MW thermoelectric co-generation power plant at the Presidente Vargas Steelworks in December 1999. Since October 2000, the plant has provided the steelworks with approximately 60% of the electric energy needed in its steel mills. Aside from operational improvements, the power plant supplies our strip mills with electric energy, processed steam and forced air from the blast furnaces, benefiting the surrounding environment through the elimination of flares that burn steel-processing gases into the atmosphere. In addition, we installed a new turbine generator in 2014, which added 21 MW to our existing installed capacity. This turbine is located near our Blast Furnace No. 3, and uses the outlet gases from the iron making process to generate energy. Itá Hydroelectric Facility Tractebel and CSN each own 48.75% of ITASA, a special-purpose company formed for the purpose of owning and operating, under a 30-year concession granted in 2000, 60.5% of the Itá hydroelectricfacility on the Uruguay river in Southern Brazil. Companhia de Cimento Itambé, or Itambé, owns the remaining 2.5% of ITASA. Tractebel directly owns the remaining 39.5% of the Itá hydroelectric facility.
Table of contents The power facility was built using a project finance structure with an investment of approximately U.S.$860 million. The long-term financing for the project was closed in March 2001 and consisted of U.S.$78 million in debentures issued by ITASA, a U.S.$144 million loan from private banks and U.S.$116 million of direct financing from BNDES, all of which were paid in February 2013. The sponsors of the project have invested approximately U.S.$306 million in this project. Itá has an installed capacity of 1,450 MW, with a firm guaranteed output of 668 MW, and became fully operational in March 2001. We and the other shareholders of ITASA have the right to take our pro rata share (proportional to our ownership interest in the project) of Itá’s output pursuant to 30-year power purchase agreements at a fixed price per megawatt hour, adjusted annually for inflation. Since October 2002, we have been using our entire Itá take internally. Igarapava Hydroelectric Facility We own 17.9% of a consortium that built and has the right to operate for 30 years the Igarapava hydroelectric facility. Other consortium members are Aliança, Votorantim Metais Zinco and AngloGold Ashanti Mineração Ltda. The plant has an installed capacity of 210 MW, corresponding to 136 MW of firm guaranteed output. We have been using our 23 MW take from Igarapava to supply energy to the Arcos mines and our other units. Marketing Organization and Strategy Flat Steel Our steel products are sold both domestically and abroad as a main raw material for several different manufacturing industries, including the automotive, home appliance, packaging, construction and steel processing industries. Our sales approach is to establish brand loyalty and achieve a reputation for quality products by developing relationships with our clients and focusing on their specific needs, providing tailor-made solutions for each of our clients. Our commercial area is responsible for sales of all of our products. This area is divided into two major teams, one focused on international sales and the other on domestic sales. The domestic market oriented sales team is divided into seven market segments: Packaging, Distribution Network, Automotive Industry (Automakers and Auto Parts), Home Appliances, Original Equipment Manufacturer, or OEM, Construction and Pipes. The commercial area also has a team called “Special Sales” which is responsible for selling all the process residues, such as blast furnace slag, pitch and ammonia, which are widely used as inputs in chemical and cement industries. The Distribution Network division is responsible for supplying large steel processors and distributors. Besides the independent distributors, CSN also has its own distributor, called Prada Distribuição. The Pipes division supplies oil and gas pipe manufacturers as well as some industries that produce small diameter pipe and light profiles. The Packaging unit acts in an integrated way with suppliers, representatives of the canning industry and distributors to respond to customer needs for finished-products. The Automotive unit is supplied by a specialized mill, CSN Porto Real, and also by a portion of the galvanized material produced at Presidente Vargas Steelworks, benefitting from a combined sales strategy. Historically, our export sales were made primarily through international brokers. However, as part of our strategy to establish direct, longer-term relationships with end-users, we have decreased our reliance on such brokers. We have focused our international sales on more profitable markets in order to maximize revenues and shareholder returns. All of our sales are on an order-by-order basis and have an average delivery time of 45 days. As a result, our production levels closely reflect our order log book status. We forecast sales trends in both thedomestic and export markets based on the historical data available and the general economic outlook for the near future. We have our own data systems to remain informed of worldwide and Brazilian market developments. Further, our management believes that one of the keys to our success is maintaining a presence in the export market. Such presence gives us the flexibility to shift between domestic and export markets, thereby allowing us to maximize our profitability.
Table of contents Unlike with other commodity products, there is no exchange trading of steel, or uniform pricing, as wide differences exist in terms of size, quality and specifications. In general, exports are priced based on international spot prices of steel at the time of sale in U.S. dollars or Euros, depending on the destination. Sales are normally paid up front, or within 14 or 28 days, and, in the case of exports, usually backed by a letter of credit and an insurance policy. Sales are made primarily on cost and freight terms. Sales by Geographic Region
In 2015, we sold steel products to customers in Brazil as well as to customers in 32 other countries. The fluctuations in the portion of total sales assigned to domestic and international markets, which can be seen in the table below, reflect our ability to adjust sales in light of variations in the domestic and international economies, as well as steel demand and prices, both domestically and abroad. The two main export markets for our products are North America and Europe, representing approximately 70% and 18%, respectively, of our export sales volume in 2015. In North America, we utilize our subsidiary CSN LLC, which acts as a commercial channel for our products. CSN has historically shipped hot-rolled to CSN LLC which is then processed and transformed into more value-added products at CSN LLC’s plant, such as cold-rolled coil and galvanized. Moreover, we are able to export cold-rolled coils which can be directly sold or processed by CSN LLC in order to manufacture galvanized products. CSN – Sales of All Steel Products by Destination | (In thousands of metric tons and millions of R$) | | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | | Tons | % of Total | Net Operating Revenues(2) | % of Total | Tons | % of Total | Net Operating Revenues(2) | % of Total | Tons | % of Total | Net Operating Revenues(2) | % of Total | Brazil | 2,968 | 59.50% | 6,612 | 60.40% | 3,718 | 72.00% | 8,493 | 75.40% | 4,650 | 76.00% | 9,529 | 78.50% | Export | 2,022 | 40.50% | 4,332 | 39.60% | 1,460 | 28.00% | 2,764 | 24.60% | 1,467 | 24.00% | 2,603 | 21.50% | Total | 4,990 | 100% | 10,944 | 100% | 5,117 | 100% | 11,257 | 100% | 6,117 | 100% | 12,132 | 100% | Exports by Region | | | | | | | | | | | | | Asia | 9 | 0% | 17 | 0% | 48 | 3.20% | 78 | 2.80% | 30 | 2.10% | 45 | 1.70% | North America(1) | 802 | 39.70% | 1,834 | 42.30% | 289 | 19.70% | 669 | 24.20% | 298 | 20.30% | 597 | 22.90% | Latin America | 115 | 5.70% | 376 | 8.70% | 59 | 4.00% | 161 | 5.80% | 59 | 4.00% | 148 | 5.70% | Europe | 1,090 | 53.90% | 2,087 | 48.20% | 1,057 | 72.10% | 1,840 | 66.60% | 1,071 | 73.00% | 1,793 | 68.90% | All Others | 7 | 0% | 18 | 0% | 7 | 0.50% | 16 | 0.60% | 9 | 0.60% | 21 | 0.80% |
_______________ (1) Sales to Mexico are included in North America.(2) Net operating revenues presented above differ from amounts in our IFRS consolidated financial statements because they do not include revenues from non-steel products (non-steel products include mainly by-products, iron ore, logistics services and cement). Sales by Product The following table sets forth our market shares for steel sales in Brazil of hot-rolled, cold-rolled, galvanized and tin mill products for 2015, 2014 and 2013.
Table of contents CSN Domestic Market Share | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | Hot-Rolled Products | 36% | 41% | 45% | Cold-Rolled Products | 19% | 18% | 17% | Galvanized Products | 28% | 28% | 27% | Tin Mill Products | 12% | 11% | 11% | Long SteelOur Mines
The acquisition Location, Access and Operation
Casa de Pedra Casa de Pedra mine is an open pit mine located in February 2012 the city of SWT, located in Unterwellenborn, Germany, marks our entrance into the long steel market. SWT specializesCongonhas in the productionState of profiles, including IPE (European I Beams)Minas Gerais, Brazil, approximately 80 km south of the city of Belo Horizonte and HE (European Wide Flange Beams) sections, channels and UPE (Channels with Parallel Flanges) sections and steel sleepers. In total, more than 200 types360 km north of sections are produced according to different German and international standards.the city of The following chart reflects our production cycle in general terms.
Production Process
Scrap arrives at the mill by rail or road. Two gantry cranes are used to transfer the scrap to a stockyard. Two remote-controlled diesel-hydraulically driven transfer wagons carry the recycled steel in containers, which also function as charging vessels to the melting shop.
Table Of Contentsof contents Rio de Janeiro. The electric arcsite is approximately 1,000 meters above sea level and accessible from the cities of Belo Horizonte or Congonhas through mostly paved roads. Casa de Pedra mine is a hematite-rich iron deposit of an early proterozoic banded iron formation in Brazil’s Iron Ore Quadrangle (Quadrilátero Ferrífero), which is located in the central part of the DC-furnace is generated between a graphite electrodeState of Minas Gerais in the Southeastern region of Brazil and the bottomhas been one of the furnace,most important iron producing regions in Brazil for the last 50 years. It has been incorporated to CSN in 1941, but has been in operation since 1913. Our iron ore at Casa de Pedra is currently excavated by a fleet composed of Komatsu PC5500 and Caterpillar 6060 hydraulic shovels, wheel loaders (Caterpillar 994H, Komatsu WA1200 and LeTourneau 1850) and then hauled by a fleet of Caterpillar 793D (240 tons), Caterpillar 793F (240 tons) and Terex Unit Rig MT4400AC (240 tons). This fleet has an installed annual ROM capacity of approximately 130 million tons. Then the ore is processed in our treatment facilities, which functions ashave an installed capacity of 28 million tons of products per year. We use in Casa de Pedra electrical power provided by hydroelectric plants. Casa de Pedra mine supplies all of our iron ore needs exept pellets, producing lump ore, sinter feed and pellet feed fines with high iron content. The maps below illustrate the anode. This energy, supplemented by natural gas/oxygen burners, is used to convert this material into molten steel.location of our Casa de Pedra mine: After the smelting process, the molten metal is tapped into the ladle in a wagon, which is then positioned under the ladle furnace. The purpose
Table of this process is to achieve the desired composition, by the addition of alloys, and the necessary final temperature of the steel. The ladle is then transported to the casting shop with the transport wagon and is elevated onto the turret that rotates it into the casting position. The tundish distributes the steel to four strands of water-cooled copper moulds that provide the desired beam blank shape. As soon as the strands pass through the moulds they undergo an intensive cooling process. After solidification is complete, the strands pass through guides which transport and straighten the strands out of the casting arc into the horizontal plane, where they are then cut into pieces of the required length with automatic flame-cutting torches. A transfer manipulator passes the beam blanks to the roller table of the rolling mill.contents The rolling mill provides facilities for both duo and universal rolling processes. In contrast to the continuous operation where the sections are rolled in strands arranged one after the other, in this reversing mill the section bar is run forwards and backwards in several passes through rolls that either have “grooves” or function according to the universal rolling principle.
The three stand assemblies in the rolling mill include, a break down stand coupled with a cropping saw, a tandem group and a finishing group. After having passed the finishing strand, the dimensional accuracy of the rolled section is measured using laser technology.
The next stage is the finishing department, where the sections, which can be up to 100m long, cool down on a walking beam cooling bed, before being straightened. The sections are then cut on a cold saw plant to lengths between 6m and 28m, as requested by customers.
Production Output
Certain Operating Statistics
| | | | | | | | (In thousands of tons)
| Production of:
| | | Beam Blank
| | 885*
| Long Steel (Finished Products)
| | 827*
|
*The above operating figures cover SWT’s production during the full year of 2012. As we have consolidated SWT’s results as of February 2012, its production during this period was of 812 thousand tons of beam blank and 755 thousand tons of long steel (finished products).
Raw Materials and Suppliers
Raw Materials and Energy RequirementsEngenho
The main raw material weEngenho mine is also an open pit mine located at the Southwestern region of the Iron Ore Quadrangle, 60 km south of the city of Belo Horizonte and is accessible from the cities of Belo Horizonte or Congonhas through mostly paved roads. The map below illustrates the location of our Engenho mine: The Engenho mine started operation in 1950. The ore in this mine is excavated by a fleet of wheel loaders (Komatsu WA470) and excavators (Komatsu PC600) and then hauled by a fleet of Mercedes-Benz Actros 4844 trucks. There is also equipment that operates in the dam and in the yard. These fleet consist of wheel loaders (Komatsu WA470 and Komatsu WA500), excavators (Komatsu PC600 and Komatsu PC350) and trucks (Mercedes-Benz Actros 4844 and Mercedes-Benz Axor 4144). Then the ore is processed in the Pires treatment facilities, which have an installed capacity of 7 million tons of products per year. We use electrical power provided by hydroelectric plants in our long steel operation is scrap. In addition, our production operations consume electricity, naturalEngenho mine and technical gases and ancillary materials like ferroalloys, lime, dolomite and foaming coal.Pires Complex. ScrapFernandinho
During 2010 and 2011, prices for scrap continuously increased due to unbalanced supply and demand in Europe and increasing globalization of scrap trading worldwide. PricesThe Fernandinho mine is located in the European market were particularly affected by pricescity of Itabirito, in Turkey and Asia. In 2012, the average price decreased slightly due to lower demand for scrap as a consequenceState of Minas Gerais. This city is located in the Middle-East region of the financial crisis. In 2012, our scrap consumption totaledState of Minas Gerais and approximately 960,000 million tons andaccounted for nearly 60%40 km from the city of Belo Horizonte. Fernandinho is an open pit mine and is accessible from the cities of Belo Horizonte or Itabirito through mostly paved roads. The map below illustrates the location of our production cost. We are able to obtain 80% of our scrap needs from within a 250 km vicinity.Fernandinho mine:
Table Of Contentsof contents The Fernandinho mine also started operation in 1950. The ore in this mine is excavated by a fleet of wheel loaders (Komatsu WA470) and excavators (Komatsu PC350LC-8) and then hauled by Mercedes Bens AXOR 4144K trucks. Then the ore is processed in the Fernandinho treatment facilities, which have an installed capacity of 600 thousand tons of products per year. We use electrical power provided by hydroelectric plants in Fernandinho mine as well. The map below shows the location of Casa de Pedra, Engenho and Fernandinho Mines: Casa de Pedra and Engenho mines are now part of a company named Congonhas Minérios, which resulted from the combination of the iron ore and related logistic assets of CSN and Namisa. See “Item 5A Specific Events Affecting our Results of Operations” for more information on the transaction.
Table of contents Limestone and Dolomite Mine Our extraction and preparation of limestone and dolomite is done at our Bocaina mining facility located in the city of Arcos, in the State of Minas Gerais. The Bocaina mine is an open pit mine and it can be accessed from the cities of Belo Horizonte, located at approximately 230 km, and Volta Redonda (where the Presidente Vargas Steelworks is situated), located at approximately 462 km, through mostly paved roads. The ore in this mine is excavated by a fleet wheel loaders (Caterpillar 990, Caterpillar 980 and excavators (Komatsu PC350LC-8, Hitachi ZX470LC-5) and then hauled by a fleet of Iveco Trakker 8 x 4, Caterpillar 775, Mercedes Axor 2831 6 x 4 and Volkswagen Constellation 21330 trucks. This mining facility has an installed annual production capacity of approximately 4.0 million tons. This mining facility has sufficient limestone and dolomite reserves to adequately supply our steel production, at current levels, for 40 years. The Bocaina mine is wholly-owned by us.The maps below illustrate the location of this mine: Ferroalloys, lime and foaming coal
Because we do not own any sources of alloys, lime and foaming coal we have to buy these materials from traders. Our traders are located mostly in Europe and the materials come from different producers around the world.
Rolls
We consume different types of rolls in our rolling mill, usually cast rolls which come from Germany, Italy, Slovenia and China.
Graphite electrodes
In the smelting shop (electric arc furnace), we use graphite electrodes with a diameter of 750mm and in the ladle furnace, we use electrodes with a diameter of 400mm. The electrodes come from Europe, Japan and China.
Other raw materials
In our production of steel we consume, on an annual basis, amounts of electrodes, rolls, refractory materials and materials for packaging and spare parts, which are mostly purchased from domestic suppliers.
Water
Large amounts of water are required in the production process. Our source of water is the Saale river, located 5 km from the plant. We use our own water station to pump water via pipelines to the plant.
Electricity and Natural Gas
Steelmaking also requires significant amounts of electricity and natural gas, for which we have supply contracts. Under normal conditions, we consume approximately 450 GWh of electric energy and an equal amount of natural gas.
Suppliers
We acquire the inputs necessary for the production of our products in Germany and other countries.
Our main raw materials suppliers are set forth below:
| | | Main Suppliers
| | | | | | Scholz, TSR
| | Scrap
| Verbund
| | Electric Energy
| E.on Ruhrgas
| | Natural gas
| RHI
| | Refractory
| SGL, Graftec, NCK
| | Electrodes
| Siemens, Schneider, Voith
| | Spare parts
| Irle, Walzengießerei Coswig
| | Rolls
|
FacilitiesTin
SWT possessesWe own a 28km internal railway system,tin operation in Itapuã do Oeste, in the State of Rondônia, through our subsidiaryEstanho de Rondônia S.A. (ERSA). This facility has an installed annual production capacity of approximately 3,600 tons of tin, which we use substantially as a raw material to produce tin plate, a coated steel product. A small part of our tin production that is not used as raw material is sold to third parties; however, the results from these sales are insignificant to our consolidated results.
Mineral Rights and Ownership The Mining Code and the logistics infrastructureBrazilian Federal Constitution impose requirements on mining companies relating to, ensure supplyamong other things, the manner in which mineral deposits are exploited, the health and safety of scrapworkers, the protection and deliveryrestoration of finished products. Main markets served by SWT include: non-residential construction, equipmentindustries, engineering and transport, in Germany and neighboring countries, including Polandthe environment, the prevention of pollution and the Czech Republic.promotion of the health and safety of local communities where the mines are located. The Mining Code also imposes certain notifications and reporting requirements.
Table Of Contentsof contents We hold concessions to mine iron ore, limestone and dolomite. We purchase manganese in the local market. We own 87.52% of Congonhas Minérios mines and 100% of Bocaina and Santa Bárbara mines. In addition, each mine is an “open pit” mine. Iron ore extraction, crushing, screening and concentration are done in three different sites: Casa de Pedra mine and Pires beneficiation plant (all Congonhas Minério’s property) and Fernandinho mine, a Minerérios Nacional’s property Casa de Pedra Our mining rights for Casa de Pedra mine include the mine, a beneficiation plant, roads, a loading yard and a railway branch and are duly registered with the Brazilian Department of Mineral Production (Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineral), or DNPM. DNPM has also granted us easements in 19 mine areas located in the surrounding region, which are not currently part of Casa de Pedra mine. We believe we have obtained and are in compliance with all licenses and authorizations for our operations and projects at Casa de Pedra mine. Exploration undertaken at the Casa de Pedra mine is subject to mining lease restrictions, which were reflected in our iron ore reserve calculations. Quality requirements (chemical and physical) are the key “modifying factors” in the definition of ore reserves at Casa de Pedra and were properly accounted for by us. Mineral Reserves The following table sets forth the type of each of our mines, period of operation, projected exhaustion dates and percentage of our interest: Mine | | Type | | Operating Since | | Projected exhaustion date | | CSN % interest | | | | | | | | | | Iron: | | | | | | | | | Casa de Pedra (Congonhas, Minas Gerais) | | Open pit | | 1913 | | 2040 | | 87.52 | Engenho (Congonhas, Minas Gerais) | | Open pit | | 2007 (Start of operation by Namisa) | | 2040 | | 87.52 | Fernandinho (Itabirito, Minas Gerais) | | Open pit | | 2007 (Start of operation by Namisa) | | 2039 | | 87.52 | | | | | | | | | | Limestone and Dolomite: | | | | | | | | | Bocaina (Arcos, Minas Gerais) | | Open pit | | 1946 | | 2055 | | 100 | Tin | | | | | | | | | Santa Barbara (Itapuã do Oeste, Rondonia) | | Open pit | | 1950 | | 2054 | | 100 |
The following table sets forth our estimates of proven and probable reserves and other mineral deposits at our mines reflecting the results of reserve studies. They have been calculated in accordance with the technical definitions contained in the SEC’s Industry Guide 7, and estimates of mine life described herein are derived from such reserve estimates. The mineralized material disclosed are for the entire mines, and not just for our proportional interest in the mines. In the most recent reserve audit conducted in 2014, the losses for mine dilution and mining recovery considered were 5% each for both Casa de Pedra and Engenho mines. In 2014 we audited resources and reserves for Casa de Pedra and Engenho mines. As for Fernandinho mine we audited only resources. We do not have audited resources/reserves studies for our Bocaina mine, thus the resources/reserves presented at the table below were not audited by any third parties for that mine. As for our Santa Barbara mine we do not have reserve estimates and do not currently plan to begin campaigns to complete a study in connection with these property in light of its low materiality to our business.
Table of contents Proven and Probable Reserves1 | | | | | | | | | | Recoverable | Mine Name | Audited Reserves | Ore Tonnage3 | | | Product5 | and Location | (in millions of tons) | (in millions of tons) | Grade4 | Rock Type | (in millions of tons) | | Proven6 | Probable7 | Proven6 | Probable7 | | | | Iron: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Hematite (7%) | | Casa de Pedra(Congonhas, Minas Gerais) | 1,043 | 1,662 | 1,002 | 1,662 | 41.36% Fe | Itabirite (93%) | 1.47 | | | | | | | Hematite (3%) | | Engenho (Congonhas, Minas Gerais) | 108 | 209 | 108 | 209 | 39.48% | Itabirite (97%) | 163 | | | | | | | | | Fernandinho (Itabirito, Minas Gerais) | | | | | 40.21% | Itabirite (100%) | | Total Iron: | | | | | | | | Limestone and Dolomite: | Proven6 | Probable(7) | Proven(6) | Probable(7) | | | | | | | | | 43.84%CaO | Limestone (89.3%) | | Bocaina (Arcos, Minas Gerais) | 311 | 38 | 308 | 38 | 3.71%MgO | Dolomite (10.7%) | 261 |
(1) Reserves means the part of a mineral deposit which could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination. We do not have reserve audits for the Fernandinho mine. The reserves for the Casa de Pedra and Fernandinho mines were audited in December, 2014 and we have reduced the amount of proven reserves by our annual production since then. (2) Mineralization that has been sufficiently sampled at close enough intervals to reasonably assume continuity between samples within the area of influence. This material does not yet qualify as a reserve. (3) Represents ROM material. (4) Grade is the proportion of metal or mineral present in ore or any other host material. (5) Represents total product tonnage after mining and processing losses. (6) Means reserves for which: (i) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes; grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling; and (ii) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely and the geologic character is so well defined that size, shape, depth and mineral content of reserves are well- established. (7) Means reserves for which quantity and grade and /or quality are computed from information similar to that used for proven (measure) reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower than that for proven (measure) reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of observation. The metallurgical recovery factor is the proportion of iron in the ore delivered to the processing plant that is recovered by the metallurgical process. In 2015, the metallurgical recovery factor obtained by Casa de Pedra concentration plant was 82.0% and by the Pires plant was 65.8%. The cutoff grade is the minimum ore percentage that determines which material will be fed in the processing plant. The cutoff grade value for Casa de Pedra and Engenho mines considered in the most recent audit is 23.37%.
Table of contents The prices used in the 2014 audit for the estimation of Casa de Pedra reserves, are shown in the following table. As shown, the product price we assumed to estimate our reserves, is based on expectations of an average long term price of US$90 per ton, considering that as a reasonable price for a sustainable development of the iron ore market. | Price for the three years prior to the audit | | Long term average | | (US$/t) | | (US$/t) | | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | | Assumption | Platts 62Fe CFR N.China ($/dmt) | 169 | 130 | 135 | | 90 |
Effective CapacityCasa de Pedra
In 2012, we started a multi-year study of our iron ore resources and reserves at Casa de Pedra. The study consists of two stages the first stage of which was completed at the end of December of 2014, and the second stage of which involves more drillings and research of the deposit. The first stage includes all drillholes until October of 2013, and the second one includes all drillholes after October of 2013 by the end of the drilling campaign in December of 2014. Both stages of this new study of resources and reserves of Casa de Pedra mine are in accordance with best pratices in the iron ore market. We conducted extensive work throughout 2014 to document and classify all information related to both the current and future operations of the Casa de Pedra mine. In 2014, we hired Snowden Group, to undertake an independent analysis of the Casa de Pedra iron ore resources and reserves. Snowden carried out a full analysis of all available information and has independently validated our reported resources and reserves. Snowden accepts as appropriate the estimates regarding proven and probable reserves made by us, totaling 2,704 milliontons of iron ore (as of December 31, 2014) at a grade of 41.36% Fe and 36.46% SiO2. This new estimate of our iron ore reserves at Casa de Pedra is significantly larger than our estimate of 1,631 million tons, contained in an appraisal report prepared in 2006 by Golder Associates. Over the course of the Casa de Pedra Mine’s life we have executed different drilling campaigns and, in total, we have drilled 106,791 meters by the end of October of 2013, the first stage of the iron ore resources and reserves report. The last completed campaign started in October of 2012 and ended in November of 2014. In the course of that campaign, we drilled 15,752.25 meters that we used in this first stage of resources and reserves and we are currently extending our drilling campaign 17,539.40 meters which we will use in the second stage to increase and improve our knowledge of the iron ore deposits at Casa de Pedra. Engenho and Fernandinho In 2012 we started the same process used at Casa de Pedra to identify iron ore resources and reserves at the Engenho and iron ore resources at the Fernandinho mine in two stages. We conducted extensive work throughout 2014 to document and classify all information related to both the current and future operations of the Engenho and Fernandinho mines. In 2014, we hired Snowden Group, to conduct an independent analysis of the Engenho iron ore resources and reserves and Fernandinho resources. Snowden carried out a full analysis of all available information and has independently validated our reported resources and reserves. Snowden accepts as appropriate the estimates regarding proven and probable reserves made by us, totaling for Engenho 317 million tons of iron ore (as of December 31, 2014) at a grade of 39.48% Fe and 40.01% SiO2. | | | | | | | | | | Process:
| | | | | EAF – Electric Arc Furnace
| | 1,100,000
| | 1 furnace
| Ladle Furnace
| | 1,100,000
| | 1 furnace
| Finished Products:
| | | | | Section mill
| | 1,000,000
| | 1 mill
|
Table of contents In November 2012 we started a new drilling campaign with an additional 11,899 meters in the Engenho mine. In this first stage we use drillings performed up until the end of October 2013. For Engenho we used 4,085 meters of this last campaign totaling 9,264 meters to report the first stage estimates. In the second stage (the drilling performed up until December, 2014) we will use 7,814 meters in the Engenho mine. Production Casa de Pedra The Casa de Pedra facilities are located in the city of Congonhas, in the State of Minas Gerais. The Casa de Pedra mine is located 350 km from the Presidente Vargas Steelworks and supplies iron ore products to our steel mill, as well as for export through the Itaguaí Port. Casa de Pedra’s equipment fleet and treatment facilities have an installed annual ROM capacity of approximately 130 million tons and 28 million tons, respectively. Pires and Fernandinho Beneficiation Plants Pires plant is the beneficiation plant of Congonhas Minérios. The plant receives material from Engenho mine (located at the northern border of the Casa de Pedra mine) and processes crude ore acquired from other companies, which along with its own ROM, generates final products such as: lump ore, small lump ore (hematitinha), sinter feed and concentrates. Fernandinho plant receives material from Fernandinho mine (located in the city of Itabirito) generates sinter feed and fines as final products. The table below sets forth production of iron ore of our mines for the last three years: | Production1 | | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | Casa de Pedra2 (Mt) | 15.4 | 21.65 | 26.24 | Grade (%) | 63.80% | 63.80% | 63.80% | Pires 2 (Mt) | 3.4 | 3.8 | 1.6 | Grade (%) | 61.60% | 62.10% | 63.90% | Fernandinho2 (Mt) | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0 | Grade (%) | 59.40% | 59.50% | - |
(1) In addition to its own production, Namisa also purchased iron ore from third parties. Third party purchase volumes totaled 11.9 million tons, 8.3 million tons and 3.1 million tons in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. (2) Production information considers 100% of the mines. | CSN Consolidated Sales1 | | 2013 | 2014 | 20152 | Consolidated Sales (Mt) | 25.67 | 28.88 | 25.67 | Consolidated Net Revenue Per Unit (US$/t) | 98 | 64 | 26.91 |
(1) Consolidated sales consider 100% of Namisa’s Sales Volume until November 2015. (2) Since December 2015, we have been considering 100% stake of Congonhas Minérios. Distribution Transportation costs are a significant component of our steel and iron ore production costs and are a factor in our price-competitiveness in the export market. Railway is the main means of transport by which we convey raw materials from our mines to the Presidente Vargas Steelworks and steel and iron ore products to ports for shipment overseas. Iron ore, limestone and dolomite from our two mines located in the State of Minas Gerais are transported by railroad to the Presidente Vargas Steelworks forprocessing into steel. The distances from our mines to the Presidente Vargas Steelworks are 328 km and 455 km. The distances from our mines to the ports are 440 km and 160 km. Imported coal and coke bought from foreign suppliers are unloaded at the port of Itaguaí, 90 km west of the city of Rio de Janeiro, and shipped 109 km by train to the Presidente Vargas Steelworks. Our finished steel products are transported by train, truck and ships to our customers throughout Brazil and abroad. Our most important local markets are the cities of São Paulo (335 km from the Presidente Vargas Steelworks), Rio de Janeiro (120 km) and Belo Horizonte (429 km).
Table of contents Until recently, Brazil’s railway system (including railcars and tracks) was principally government-owned and in need of repair, but it has now been largely privatized. In an attempt to increase the reliability of our rail transportation, we hold interests in companies that hold concessions for the main railway systems we use. For further information on our railway concessions, see “—Facilities—Railways.” We export iron ore and import coal and coke through the Itaguaí Port, in the State of Rio de Janeiro. The coal and container terminals have been operated by us since August 1997 and 1998, respectively. Our MiningLogistics Segment Our mining activities are onelogistics segment is comprised of railway and port facilities. Railways Southeastern Railway System MRS has a 30-year concession to operate, through the largestyear 2026 and renewable for an equal period of 30 years, Brazil’s Southeastern railway system. As of December 31, 2015, we held 34.94% of MRS’s total capital. For more information see “Item 5E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements”. The Brazilian Southeastern railway system, with 1,643 km of track, serves the São Paulo - Rio de Janeiro - Belo Horizonte industrial triangle in Southeast Brazil, and are mainly driven bylinks our mines located in the explorationState of oneMinas Gerais to the ports located in the states of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro and to the richest Braziliansteel mills of CSN, Companhia Siderúrgica Paulista or Cosipa, and Gerdau Açominas. In addition to serving other customers, the railway transports iron ore reserves,from our mines at Casa de Pedra in the State of Minas Gerais.Gerais and coke and coal from Itaguaí Port in the State of Rio de Janeiro to the Presidente Vargas Steelworks and transports our exports to the ports of Itaguaí and Rio de Janeiro. The railway system connects the Presidente Vargas Steelworks to the container terminal at Itaguaí Port, which handles most of our steel exports. Our transport volumes represent approximately 19% of the Brazilian Southeastern railway system’s total volume. We sell ourare jointly and severally liable, along with the other main MRS’s shareholders, for the full payment of the outstanding amount of its indebtedness (See “Item 5E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements”). However we expect that MRS will make the lease payments through internally generated funds and proceeds from financing. Northeastern Railway System We hold interest in companies that have concessions to operate the Northeastern railway system, which operates in the states of Maranhão, Piauí, Ceará, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Alagoas and Rio Grande do Norte and connects with the region’s leading ports, offering an important competitive advantage through opportunities for intermodal transportation solutions and made-to-measure logistics projects. Resolution No. 4,042/2013 issued by the transportation regulatory agency (Agência Nacional de Transportes Terrestres), or ANTT, authorized the partial spin-off of TLSA and, as a result, the Northeastern railway system is currently divided into the Railway System I, operated by FTL, and the Railway System II, operated by TLSA. As of December 31, 2015, we held 89.79% of the capital stock of FTL, which has a concession to operate the Railway System I (which encompasses the stretches between the cities of São Luís – Mucuripe, Arrojado – Recife, Itabaiana – Cabedelo, Paula Cavalcante – Macau and Propiá – Jorge Lins) of Brazil’s Northeastern railway system until 2027, renewable for an additional 30 years. The Railway System I consists of 4,238 km of railways. As of December 31, 2015, R$98.7 million in concession payments were outstanding over the remaining 12 years of the concession.
Table of contents As of December 31, 2015, we held 56.92% of the capital stock of TLSA, which has a concession to construct and operate the Railway System II (which encompasses the stretches between Missão Velha – Salgueiro, Salgueiro – Trindade, Trindade – Eliseu Martins, Salgueiro – Porto de Suape and Missão Velha – Porto de Pecém) of Brazil’s Northeastern railway system. Once concluded, the Railway System II will have an extension of 1,753 km of tracks that will connect the interior of Northeast Brazil to Pecém and Suape Ports. This concession was granted in 1997 and recently had its original term extended until the earlier of 2057 or the date when TLSA reaches a rate of annual return of 6.75% of its total investment with monetary adjustments. For more information, see “Item 5E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.” Port Facilities Solid Bulks Terminal We operate an integrated and modern logistics structure. Part of this structure includes the operation of TECAR through a concession renewed in 2015 and expiring in 2047. TECAR is connected to road and rail systems across Southeastern Brazil and is one of the four port terminals that make up the Port of Itaguaí facilities. With a strategic location and a total area of 740,761 m², the terminal consists of a concrete molded berthing pier superposed on jacketed stilts connected to the mainland by an access bridge perpendicular to the berthing pier. Its backyard includes conveyor belts, an internal road system, bulk storage yards, a railway looping, as well as industrial and administrative facilities. Our imports of coal and coke and exports of iron ore occur through this terminal. Under the terms of the concession, we have the obligation to ship at least 3.0 million tons of bulk cargo annuallyand, as of 2020, we undertook to ship 38.4 million tons of iron ore annually. Among the approved investments, that we had previously announced was the development and expansion of the solid bulks terminal at Itaguaí, which phase 1 expansion to handle up to 45 million tons of iron ore per year was completed in 2013. For further information, see “—D. Property, Plant and Equipment—Planned Investments—Mining.” Container Terminal We own 99.99% of Sepetiba Tecon S.A., or TECON, which has a concession to operate the container terminal at Itaguaí Port for a 25-year term expiring in 2026, that is renewable for another 25 years. As of December 31, 2015, approximately U.S.$69 million of the cost of the concession remained payable over the next 11 years of the contract. For more information, see “Item 5E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.” The Itaguaí Port is located in Brazil’s Southeast Region, with all major exporting and importing areas of the states of São Paulo, Minas Gerais and Rio de Janeiro within 500 km from the port. This area represented more than 55% of the Brazilian gross domestic product, or GDP, in 2014 according to the Brazilian Geography and Statistics Institute (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística). The Brazilian Federal Port Agency has made investments in port infrastructure projects such as expanding the maritime access channel to the Itaguaí Port and increasing its depth. In addition, significant investments were made by the Brazilian federal government in adding two extra lanes to the Rio-Santos road, and in constructing the Rio de Janeiro Metropolitan Bypass, a beltway that crosses the Rio de Janeiro metropolitan area. These factors, combined with favorable natural conditions, like natural deep waters and a low urbanization rate around the port area, allow the operation of large vessels as well as highly competitive prices for all services rendered, resulting in the terminal being a major hub port in Brazil. We have invested in infrastructure and equipment at Sepetiba TECON, such as the Berth 301 Equalization, the acquisition of two new Super Post Panamax Ship-to-Shore Cranes and four new RTG cranes for yard operations, that were delivered in the first quarter of 2014. These investments, along with the previous ones, like the dredging of Sepetiba Tecon’s Berths 302/303 and access channel to ‑15.5m depth, increased TECON’s capacity from 320,000 containers (or 480,000 TEUs) to 440,000 containers (or 660,000 TEUs) per year.
Table of contents In 2015, there was a decrease in the volume of containers operated by the terminal, which handled 151,823 units, a decrease of almost 12% compared to 2014, when we handled 172,736 units. The impact, however, was mitigated because, despite the Brazilian economic crisis, the terminal was able to attract two new container service calls (Asia and Gulf of Mexico/USA). On the other hand, we exported 926,155 tons of steel products mainly in Asia, Europe2015, an increase of 154% compared to 364,053 tons in 2014, breaking a 5-year record especially as a result of a combination of low domestic demand and Brazilfavorable exchange rates . We also increased the operations of other cargoes, reaching a volume of 205,834 tons, compared to 110,348 tons in 2014. Our Cement Segment Our cement segment is comprised of a cement plant in Volta Redonda, in the state of Rio de Janeiro, and in Arcos, in the state of Minas Gerais. In 2015, two new crushing facilities were delivered in Arcos, increasing its annual capacity by 2.2 million tons of cement. With the implementation of the new clinker kiln in Arcos (MG), scheduled for 2016, CSN will achieve self-sufficiency in the production of this raw material. Production The cement production is held at Volta Redonda and Arcos and begins with the influx of raw materials: clinker, limestone, gypsum and slag. We consume clinker produced in our clinker plant in Arcos and eventually we import clinker to supply demand. Limestone comes from Arcos by rail. Slag is a by-product of iron and steel, produced in the blast furnace, and is also stored in the warehouse, arriving at the plant by road. CSN uses natural gypsum, from Ouricuri, in the state of Pernambuco, which arrives at the plant by truck and is stored in the warehouse. All transportation of raw materials within the plant is carried out by conveyor belts, placing inputs in scales according to a predefined formula and delivering them to the mills. There are two grinding lines and each mill has a nominal capacity of 170 tons/h. Annual plant capacity is 2.4 million tons of cement. The mill has a hydraulic roller system, which uses pressure to grind the layer of material on the turntable. Hot gas, derived from the combustion of natural gas or petroleum coke, is used in the mills to dry materials. The types of cement we produce are: CP III-40 RS, CP II-E-32 and CP II-E-40 in bagged and bulk forms. The plant has four silos, two of them with 10,000 tons of capacity and two with 5,000 tons of capacity. Cement can be shipped in bagged and bulk forms. We have two baggers with 12 filling nozzles (nominal capacity of 3,600 bags/hour) and two palletizers for bagging cement. Our Energy Segment Our energy segment is comprised of generation plants and is aimed at enabling us to maintain our self-sufficiency in energy, reducing our production cost and our exposure to fluctuations or availability of certain energy sources. Our energy related assets include: Thermoelectric Co-Generation Power Plant We completed the construction of a 235.2 MW thermoelectric co-generation power plant at the Presidente Vargas Steelworks in December 1999. Since October 2000, the plant has provided the steelworks with approximately 60% of the electric energy needed in its steel mills. Aside from operational improvements, the power plant supplies our strip mills with electric energy, processed steam and forced air from the blast furnaces, benefiting the surrounding environment through the elimination of flares that burn steel-processing gases into the atmosphere. In addition, we installed a new turbine generator in 2014, which added 21 MW to our existing installed capacity. This turbine is located near our Blast Furnace No. 3, and uses the outlet gases from the iron making process to generate energy. Itá Hydroelectric Facility Tractebel and CSN each own 48.75% of ITASA, a special-purpose company formed for the purpose of owning and operating, under a 30-year concession granted in 2000, 60.5% of the Itá hydroelectricfacility on the Uruguay river in Southern Brazil. Companhia de Cimento Itambé, or Itambé, owns the remaining 2.5% of ITASA. Tractebel directly owns the remaining 39.5% of the Itá hydroelectric facility.
Table of contents The power facility was built using a project finance structure with an investment of approximately U.S.$860 million. The long-term financing for the project was closed in March 2001 and consisted of U.S.$78 million in debentures issued by ITASA, a U.S.$144 million loan from private banks and U.S.$116 million of direct financing from BNDES, all of which were paid in February 2013. The sponsors of the project have invested approximately U.S.$306 million in this project. Itá has an installed capacity of 1,450 MW, with a firm guaranteed output of 668 MW, and became fully operational in March 2001. We and the other shareholders of ITASA have the right to take our pro rata share (proportional to our ownership interest in the project) of Itá’s output pursuant to 30-year power purchase agreements at a fixed price per megawatt hour, adjusted annually for inflation. Since October 2002, we have been using our entire Itá take internally. Igarapava Hydroelectric Facility We own 17.9% of a consortium that built and has the right to operate for 30 years the Igarapava hydroelectric facility. Other consortium members are Aliança, Votorantim Metais Zinco and AngloGold Ashanti Mineração Ltda. The plant has an installed capacity of 210 MW, corresponding to 136 MW of firm guaranteed output. We have been using our 23 MW take from Igarapava to supply energy to the Arcos mines and our other units. Marketing Organization and Strategy Flat Steel Our steel products are sold both domestically and abroad as a main raw material for several different manufacturing industries, including the automotive, home appliance, packaging, construction and steel processing industries. Our sales approach is to establish brand loyalty and achieve a reputation for quality products by developing relationships with our clients and focusing on their specific needs, providing tailor-made solutions for each of our clients. Our commercial area is responsible for sales of all of our products. This area is divided into two major teams, one focused on international sales and marketing taking placethe other on domestic sales. The domestic market oriented sales team is divided into seven market segments: Packaging, Distribution Network, Automotive Industry (Automakers and Auto Parts), Home Appliances, Original Equipment Manufacturer, or OEM, Construction and Pipes. The commercial area also has a team called “Special Sales” which is responsible for selling all the process residues, such as blast furnace slag, pitch and ammonia, which are widely used as inputs in chemical and cement industries. The Distribution Network division is responsible for supplying large steel processors and distributors. Besides the independent distributors, CSN also has its own distributor, called Prada Distribuição. The Pipes division supplies oil and gas pipe manufacturers as well as some industries that produce small diameter pipe and light profiles. The Packaging unit acts in an integrated way with suppliers, representatives of the canning industry and distributors to respond to customer needs for finished-products. The Automotive unit is supplied by a specialized mill, CSN Porto Real, and also by a portion of the galvanized material produced at Presidente Vargas Steelworks, benefitting from a combined sales strategy. Historically, our export sales were made primarily through international brokers. However, as part of our principal hubsstrategy to establish direct, longer-term relationships with end-users, we have decreased our reliance on such brokers. We have focused our international sales on more profitable markets in order to maximize revenues and shareholder returns. All of Minas Gerais,our sales are on an order-by-order basis and have an average delivery time of 45 days. As a result, our production levels closely reflect our order log book status. We forecast sales trends in both thedomestic and export markets based on the historical data available and the general economic outlook for the near future. We have our own data systems to remain informed of worldwide and Brazilian market developments. Further, our management believes that one of the keys to our success is maintaining a presence in the export market. Such presence gives us the flexibility to shift between domestic and export markets, thereby allowing us to maximize our profitability.
Table of contents Unlike with other commodity products, there is no exchange trading of steel, or uniform pricing, as wide differences exist in terms of size, quality and specifications. In general, exports are priced based on international spot prices of steel at the time of sale in U.S. dollars or Euros, depending on the destination. Sales are normally paid up front, or within 14 or 28 days, and, in the case of exports, usually backed by a letter of credit and an insurance policy. Sales are made primarily on cost and freight terms. Sales by Geographic Region
In 2015, we sold steel products to customers in Brazil Austria, Madeira Islands, Portugalas well as to customers in 32 other countries. The fluctuations in the portion of total sales assigned to domestic and Hong Kong.international markets, which can be seen in the table below, reflect our ability to adjust sales in light of variations in the domestic and international economies, as well as steel demand and prices, both domestically and abroad.
The two main export markets for our products are North America and Europe, representing approximately 70% and 18%, respectively, of our export sales volume in 2015. In North America, we utilize our subsidiary CSN LLC, which acts as a commercial channel for our products. CSN has historically shipped hot-rolled to CSN LLC which is then processed and transformed into more value-added products at CSN LLC’s plant, such as cold-rolled coil and galvanized. Moreover, we are able to export cold-rolled coils which can be directly sold or processed by CSN LLC in order to manufacture galvanized products. CSN – Sales of All Steel Products by Destination | (In thousands of metric tons and millions of R$) | | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | | Tons | % of Total | Net Operating Revenues(2) | % of Total | Tons | % of Total | Net Operating Revenues(2) | % of Total | Tons | % of Total | Net Operating Revenues(2) | % of Total | Brazil | 2,968 | 59.50% | 6,612 | 60.40% | 3,718 | 72.00% | 8,493 | 75.40% | 4,650 | 76.00% | 9,529 | 78.50% | Export | 2,022 | 40.50% | 4,332 | 39.60% | 1,460 | 28.00% | 2,764 | 24.60% | 1,467 | 24.00% | 2,603 | 21.50% | Total | 4,990 | 100% | 10,944 | 100% | 5,117 | 100% | 11,257 | 100% | 6,117 | 100% | 12,132 | 100% | Exports by Region | | | | | | | | | | | | | Asia | 9 | 0% | 17 | 0% | 48 | 3.20% | 78 | 2.80% | 30 | 2.10% | 45 | 1.70% | North America(1) | 802 | 39.70% | 1,834 | 42.30% | 289 | 19.70% | 669 | 24.20% | 298 | 20.30% | 597 | 22.90% | Latin America | 115 | 5.70% | 376 | 8.70% | 59 | 4.00% | 161 | 5.80% | 59 | 4.00% | 148 | 5.70% | Europe | 1,090 | 53.90% | 2,087 | 48.20% | 1,057 | 72.10% | 1,840 | 66.60% | 1,071 | 73.00% | 1,793 | 68.90% | All Others | 7 | 0% | 18 | 0% | 7 | 0.50% | 16 | 0.60% | 9 | 0.60% | 21 | 0.80% |
_______________ (1) Sales to Mexico are included in North America.(2) Net operating revenues presented above differ from amounts in our IFRS consolidated financial statements because they do not include revenues from non-steel products (non-steel products include mainly by-products, iron ore, logistics services and cement). Sales by Product The following table sets forth our market shares for steel sales in Brazil of hot-rolled, cold-rolled, galvanized and tin mill products for 2015, 2014 and 2013.
Table of contents CSN Domestic Market Share | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | Hot-Rolled Products | 36% | 41% | 45% | Cold-Rolled Products | 19% | 18% | 17% | Galvanized Products | 28% | 28% | 27% | Tin Mill Products | 12% | 11% | 11% | Our Mines Location, Access and Operation Casa de Pedra Casa de Pedra mine is an open pit mine located next toin the city of Congonhas in the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil, approximately 80 km south of the city of Belo Horizonte and 360 km north of the city of
Table of contents Rio de Janeiro. The site is approximately 1,000 meters above sea level and accessible from the cities of Belo Horizonte or Congonhas through mostly paved roads. Casa de Pedra mine is a hematite-rich iron deposit of an early proterozoic banded iron formation in Brazil’s Iron Ore Quadrangle (Quadrilátero Ferrífero), which is located in the central part of the State of Minas Gerais in the Southeastern region of Brazil and has been one of the most important iron producing regions in Brazil for the last 50 years. It has been incorporated to CSN in 1941, but has been in operation since 1913. Our iron ore at Casa de Pedra is currently excavated by a fleet composed of Marion 191M electric shovels, P&H 1900AL electric shovels, Komatsu PC5500 and Caterpillar 6060 hydraulic shovels, wheel loaders (Caterpillar 994F,994H, Komatsu WA1200 and LeTourneau 1850) and then hauled by a fleet of Terex Unit Rig MT3300AC (150Caterpillar 793D (240 tons), Caterpillar 793D793F (240 tons) and Terex Unit Rig MT4400AC (240 tons). This fleet has an installed annual ROM capacity of approximately 130 million tons. Then the ore is processed in our treatment facilities, which have an installed capacity of 28 million tons of products per year. We use in Casa de Pedra electrical power provided by hydroelectric plants. Casa de Pedra mine is wholly-owned by us and supplies all of our iron ore needs exept pellets, producing lump ore, sinter feed and pellet feed fines with high iron content. The maps below illustrate the location of our Casa de Pedra mine:
Table Of Contentsof contents
NamisaEngenho
We own additional iron ore assets through Namisa, our 60% consolidated investee, which acquired CFM (Companhia de Fomento Mineral e Participações) in July 2007. CFM was formed in 1996 with the purpose of utilizing and enhancing the ore treatment facilities of the Itacolomy mines, for the beneficiation of crude ore extracted from the Engenho mine.
The Engenho mine is also an open pit mine located at the Southwestern region of the Iron Ore Quadrangle, 60 km south of the city of Belo Horizonte and is accessible from the cities of Belo Horizonte or Congonhas through mostly paved roads. The map below illustrates the location of our Engenho mine:
Table Of Contents
The Engenho mine’smine started operation started in 1950. The ore in this mine is excavated by a fleet of wheel loaders (Komatsu WA470-6)WA470) and excavators (Komatsu PC600LC-8)PC600) and then hauled by a fleet of Iveco Trakker 410T42Mercedes-Benz Actros 4844 trucks. TheThere is also equipment that operates in the dam and in the yard. These fleet consist of wheel loaders (Komatsu WA470 and Komatsu WA500), excavators (Komatsu PC600 and Komatsu PC350) and trucks (Mercedes-Benz Actros 4844 and Mercedes-Benz Axor 4144). Then the ore is then processed in the Pires treatment facilities, which hashave an installed capacity of 7 million tons of products per year. We use electrical power provided by hydroelectric plants in Engenho mine and Pires Complex. Fernandinho The Fernandinho mine which we also hold through Namisa, is located in the city of Itabirito, in the State of Minas Gerais. This city is located in the Middle-East region of the State of Minas Gerais and approximately 40 km from the city of Belo Horizonte. Fernandinho is an open pit mine and is accessible from the cities of Belo Horizonte or Itabirito through mostly paved roads. The map below illustrates the location of our Fernandinho mine:
35
Table Of Contentsof contents The Fernandinho mine’s operationmine also started operation in 1950. The ore in this mine is excavated by a fleet of wheel loaders (Komatsu WA470-6)WA470) and excavators (Komatsu PC350LC-8) and then hauled by a fleet of Iveco Trakker 410T42 and Iveco Trakker 380T42Mercedes Bens AXOR 4144K trucks. The Then the ore is then processed in the Fernandinho treatment facilities, which hashave an installed capacity of 750600 thousand tons of products per year. We use electrical power provided by hydroelectric plants in Fernandinho mine as well. The map below shows the location of Casa de Pedra, Engenho and Fernandinho Mines: Casa de Pedra and Engenho mines are now part of a company named Congonhas Minérios, which resulted from the combination of the iron ore and related logistic assets of CSN and Namisa. See “Item 5A Specific Events Affecting our Results of Operations” for more information on the transaction.
Table of contents Limestone and Dolomite Mine Our extraction and preparation of limestone and dolomite is done at our BocaínaBocaina mining facility located in the city of Arcos, in the State of Minas Gerais. The Bocaina mine is an open pit mine and it can be accessed from the cities of Belo Horizonte, located at approximately 230 km, and Volta Redonda (where the Presidente Vargas Steelworks is situated), located at approximately 462 km, through mostly paved roads. The ore in this mine is excavated by a fleet wheel loaders (Caterpillar 990, Caterpillar 980 and excavators (Komatsu PC350LC-8, Hitachi ZX470LC-5) and then hauled by a fleet of Iveco Trakker 8 x 4, Caterpillar 775, Mercedes Axor 2831 6 x 4 and Volkswagen Constellation 21330 trucks. This mining facility has an installed annual production capacity of approximately 4.0 million tons. We believe thisThis mining facility has sufficient limestone and dolomite reserves to adequately supply our steel production, at current levels, for more than 3740 years. The mining facilityBocaina mine is located 455 km fromwholly-owned by us.The maps below illustrate the Presidente Vargas Steelworks.location of this mine:
Tin We own a tin mineoperation in Itapuã do Oeste, in the State of Rondônia, through our subsidiaryEstanho de Rondônia S.A. (ERSA). This facility has an installed annual production capacity of approximately 3,600 tons of tin, which we use substantially as a raw material to produce tin plate, a coated steel product. A small part of our tin production that is not used as raw material is sold to third parties; however, the results from these sales are insignificant to our consolidated results. Mineral Rights and Ownership The Mining Code and the Brazilian Federal Constitution impose requirements on mining companies relating to, among other things, the manner in which mineral deposits are exploited, the health and safety of workers, the protection and restoration of the environment, the prevention of pollution and the promotion of the health and safety of local communities where the mines are located. The Mining Code also imposes certain notifications and reporting requirements.
Table of contents We hold concessions to mine iron ore, limestone and dolomite. We purchase manganese in the local market. Except for Namisa’sWe own 87.52% of Congonhas Minérios mines in which we have a 60% ownership interest, we ownand 100% of each of ourBocaina and Santa Bárbara mines. In addition, each mine is an “open pit” mine. Iron ore extraction, crushing, screening and concentration are done in three different sites: Casa de Pedra (CSN’smine and Pires beneficiation plant (all Congonhas Minério’s property), Pires Beneficiation Plant and Fernandinho Mine (both Namisa’s property).mine, a Minerérios Nacional’s property Casa de Pedra Our mining rights for Casa de Pedra mine include the mine, a beneficiation plant, roads, a loading yard and a railway branch and are duly registered with the Brazilian Department of Mineral Production (Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineral), or DNPM. DNPM has also granted us easements in 19 mine areas located in the surrounding region, which are not currently part of Casa de Pedra mine. We believe we have obtained and are in compliance with all licenses and authorizations for our operations and projects at Casa de Pedra mine. Exploration undertaken at the Casa de Pedra mine is subject to mining lease restrictions, which were reflected in our iron ore reserve calculations. Quality requirements (chemical and physical) are the key “modifying factors” in the definition of ore reserves at Casa de Pedra and were properly accounted for by us. Mineral Reserves The following table sets forth the type of each of our mines, period of operation, projected exhaustion dates and percentage of our interest: | | | | | | Projected exhaustion date | | | Iron: | | | | | | | | | Casa de Pedra (Congonhas, Minas Gerais) | | Open pit | | 1913 | | 2041 | | 100 | Engenho (Congonhas, Minas Gerais) | | Open pit | | 2007 (Start of operation by Namisa) | | 2041 | | 60 | Fernandinho (Itabirito, Minas Gerais) | | Open pit | | 2007 (Start of operation by Namisa) | | 2030 | | 60 | | Limestone and Dolomite: | | | | | | | | | Bocaina (Arcos, Minas Gerais) | | Open pit | | 1946 | | 2049 | | 100 |
Mine | | Type | | Operating Since | | Projected exhaustion date | | CSN % interest | | | | | | | | | | Iron: | | | | | | | | | Casa de Pedra (Congonhas, Minas Gerais) | | Open pit | | 1913 | | 2040 | | 87.52 | Engenho (Congonhas, Minas Gerais) | | Open pit | | 2007 (Start of operation by Namisa) | | 2040 | | 87.52 | Fernandinho (Itabirito, Minas Gerais) | | Open pit | | 2007 (Start of operation by Namisa) | | 2039 | | 87.52 | | | | | | | | | | Limestone and Dolomite: | | | | | | | | | Bocaina (Arcos, Minas Gerais) | | Open pit | | 1946 | | 2055 | | 100 | Tin | | | | | | | | | Santa Barbara (Itapuã do Oeste, Rondonia) | | Open pit | | 1950 | | 2054 | | 100 |
Table Of Contents
The following table sets forth our estimates of proven and probable reserves and other mineral deposits at our mines reflecting the results of reserve studies. They have been calculated in accordance with the technical definitions contained in the SEC’s Industry Guide 7, and estimates of mine life described herein are derived from such reserve estimates. In the case of the Engenho and Fernandinho mines, where we own 60% of interests, theThe mineralized materialsmaterial disclosed are for the entire mine,mines, and not just for our proportional interest in the mine.mines. According toIn the report “Audit of Ore Reserves for CSN Casa de Pedra Iron Mine”, prepared by Golder Associatesmost recent reserve audit conducted in May 2007, our reserve estimation process is subject to some smoothing, but does not reflect2014, the losses for mine dilution and mining recovery. We intend to perform studies regarding those losses during the preparation processrecovery considered were 5% each for the new reserve audit. Likewise, Namisa’s estimation process for theboth Casa de Pedra and Engenho mines.
In 2014 we audited resources and Fernandinho mines does not reflect losses for mine dilution and mining recovery. We are in the process of performing new reserve studies for our iron ore mines. We expect to have the new audit reportreserves for Casa de Pedra and Engenho mines. As for Fernandinho mine we audited only resources. We do not have audited resources/reserves studies for our Bocaina mine, thus the resources/reserves presented at the table below were not audited by mid-2014any third parties for that mine. As for our Santa Barbara mine we do not have reserve estimates and the audit report for Namisa by late 2014.do not currently plan to begin campaigns to complete a study in connection with these property in light of its low materiality to our business.
| | MINERAL RESERVES AND QUANTITY ESTIMATES FOR MINERALIZED MATERIAL– As of December 31, 2012 | | | Proven and Probable Reserves(1) | | Quantity Estimates for Mineralized Material(2) | | | | | | | | | | | Recoverable | | | Mine Name | | Ore Tonnage(3) | | | | | | Product(5) | | Tonnage | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Probable(7) | | | | | | | | Iron: | | | | | | | | | | | | | Casa de Pedra (Congonhas, | | | | | | | | Hematite (21%) | | | | | Minas Gerais) | | 957 | | 514 | | 47.79% Fe | | Itabirite (79%) | | 836 | | 8,285 | Engenho | | | | | | | | | | | | | (Congonhas, Minas Gerais) | | | | | | 46.07% | | Itabirite (100%) | | | | 852 | Fernandinho | | | | | | | | | | | | | (Itabirito, Minas Gerais) | | | | | | 40.21% | | Itabirite (100%) | | | | 578 | Total Iron: | | 957 | | 514 | | | | | | 836 | | 9,715 | (Congonhas, Minas Gerais) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Limestone and Dolomite: | | Proven(6) | | Probable(7) | | | | | | | | | Bocaina | | | | | | 41.3%CaO | | Limestone (86%) | | | | | (Arcos, Minas Gerais) | | | | | | 5.99%MgO | | Dolomite (14%) | | | | 1,190 |
__________________Table of contents
Proven and Probable Reserves1 | | | | | | | | | | Recoverable | Mine Name | Audited Reserves | Ore Tonnage3 | | | Product5 | and Location | (in millions of tons) | (in millions of tons) | Grade4 | Rock Type | (in millions of tons) | | Proven6 | Probable7 | Proven6 | Probable7 | | | | Iron: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Hematite (7%) | | Casa de Pedra(Congonhas, Minas Gerais) | 1,043 | 1,662 | 1,002 | 1,662 | 41.36% Fe | Itabirite (93%) | 1.47 | | | | | | | Hematite (3%) | | Engenho (Congonhas, Minas Gerais) | 108 | 209 | 108 | 209 | 39.48% | Itabirite (97%) | 163 | | | | | | | | | Fernandinho (Itabirito, Minas Gerais) | | | | | 40.21% | Itabirite (100%) | | Total Iron: | | | | | | | | Limestone and Dolomite: | Proven6 | Probable(7) | Proven(6) | Probable(7) | | | | | | | | | 43.84%CaO | Limestone (89.3%) | | Bocaina (Arcos, Minas Gerais) | 311 | 38 | 308 | 38 | 3.71%MgO | Dolomite (10.7%) | 261 |
(1) Reserves means the part of a mineral deposit which could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination. We do not have reserve audits for the Engenho and Fernandinho.Fernandinho mine. The reserves for the Casa de Pedra mineand Fernandinho mines were audited in 2006December, 2014 and we have reduced the amount of proven reserves by our annual production since then. (2) Mineralization that has been sufficiently sampled at close enough intervals to reasonably assume continuity between samples within the area of influence. This material does not yet qualify as a reserve. (3) Represents ROM material. (4) Grade is the proportion of metal or mineral present in ore or any other host material. (5) Represents total product tonnage after mining and processing losses. (6) Means reserves for which: (i) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes; grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling; and (ii) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely and the geologic character is so well defined that size, shape, depth and mineral content of reserves are well- established. (7) Means reserves for which quantity and grade and /or quality are computed from information similar to that used for proven (measure) reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower than that for proven (measure) reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of observation.
Table Of Contents
We do not have audited data for resources estimates, only for reserves estimates.
The metallurgical recovery factor is the proportion of iron in the ore delivered to the processing plant that is recovered by the metallurgical process. In 2012,2015, the metallurgical recovery factor obtained by Casa de Pedra concentration plant was 76.0%. That same factor82.0% and by the Pires plant was 39.4% for the Engenho plant and 63.0% for the Fernandinho plant.65.8%. The cutoff grade is the minimum ore percentage that determines which material will be fed in the processing plant. We also plan to perform studies to determine the cutoff grade value during the preparation process for the new audit in Casa de Pedra. In the audit performed in 2006, the Benefit Function considered the lithologies to separate iron from waste. The cutoff grade value for NamisaCasa de Pedra and Engenho mines considered in the most recent audit is also yet to be determined.23.37%.
Table of contents The prices used in the 20062014 audit for the estimation of Casa de Pedra reserves, are shown in the following table (Golder’s Final Report for the Audit of Ore Reserves for CSN Casa de Pedra Iron Mine, 2007).table. As shown, the product price we assumed to estimate our reserves, is conservative in comparison tobased on expectations of an average long term price of US$90 per ton, considering that as a reasonable price for a sustainable development of the actual three-year average prices.iron ore market. PRICE FOR THE THREE YEARS PRIOR TO THE AUDIT | | Price for the three years prior to the audit | | Average | | Product Price | | (US$/t) | | (US$/t) | | (US$/t) | | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | | From 2004 to 2006 | | Assumption | Lump | 28.80 | 49.40 | 58.79 | | 45.66 | | 25.26 | “Hematitinha” | 12.08 | 28.34 | 35.75 | | 25.39 | | 18.14 | Sinter Feed | 21.91 | 37.58 | 44.73 | | 34.74 | | 20.73 | Pellet Feed Fines | 21.40 | 36.69 | 43.66 | | 33.92 | | 20.44 |
| Price for the three years prior to the audit | | Long term average | | (US$/t) | | (US$/t) | | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | | Assumption | Platts 62Fe CFR N.China ($/dmt) | 169 | 130 | 135 | | 90 |
Namisa does not yet have a reserve audit; therefore, we have not established prices to estimate reserves for its mines.
Casa de Pedra In 2006,2012, we concluded an extensive,started a multi-year study of our iron ore resources and reserves at Casa de Pedra. The study consistedconsists of three phases. Phase one,two stages the first stage of which was completed at the end of December of 2014, and the second stage of which involves more drillings and research of the deposit. The first stage includes all drillholes until October of 2013, and the second one includes all drillholes after October of 2013 by the end of the drilling campaign in 1999, covered the ore bodies that are currently being mined or are close to the current operating open pits. Phase two, which was completed in early 2003, covered the other iron ore deposits atDecember of 2014. Both stages of this new study of resources and reserves of Casa de Pedra site. Phase three startedmine are in 2005 and involved a complete revaluation of our mineral reserves at Casa de Pedra.accordance with best pratices in the iron ore market. We conducted extensive work throughout 20062014 to document and classify all information related to both the current and future operations of the Casa de Pedra mine. In 2006,2014, we hired Golder Associates S.A., or Golder,Snowden Group, to undertake an independent analysis of the Casa de Pedra iron ore resources and reserves. GolderSnowden carried out a full analysis of all available information and has independently validated our reported resources and reserves.
Table Of Contents
GolderSnowden accepts as appropriate the estimates regarding proven and probable reserves made by us, totaling 1,6312,704 milliontons of iron ore (as of December 31, 2006)2014) at a grade of 47.79%41.36% Fe and 26.63%36.46% SiO2. This new estimate of our iron ore reserves at Casa de Pedra is significantly larger than our estimate of 4441,631 million tons, contained in an appraisal report prepared in 2003.2006 by Golder Associates.
Over the course of the Casa de Pedra Mine’s life we have executed different drilling campaigns and, in total, we have drilled 91,515106,791 meters until 2011.by the end of October of 2013, the first stage of the iron ore resources and reserves report. The last completed campaign beganstarted in May 2010October of 2012 and ended in April 2011.November of 2014. In the course of that campaign, we drilled 11,069 meters. We15,752.25 meters that we used in this first stage of resources and reserves and we are currently extending our drilling campaign by an additional 30,00017,539.40 meters which we will use in the second stage to increase and improve our knowledge aboutof the iron ore deposits at Casa de Pedra. This campaign includes the programming of laboratory tests for approximately 1,800 samples. It started in October 2012, Engenho and by DecemberFernandinho In 2012 we had drilled a totalstarted the same process used at Casa de Pedra to identify iron ore resources and reserves at the Engenho and iron ore resources at the Fernandinho mine in two stages. We conducted extensive work throughout 2014 to document and classify all information related to both the current and future operations of 2,055 meters. We planthe Engenho and Fernandinho mines. In 2014, we hired Snowden Group, to conclude drilling by December 2013. We will use this new campaignconduct an independent analysis of the Engenho iron ore resources and the 2010-2011 campaign for the new reserve audit and we expect to have the new Audit Report ready by mid-2014. Namisa
An initial study was conducted at Fernandinho and Engenho mines to define the geological reserves and final pits. In 2008Fernandinho resources. Snowden carried out a full analysis of all available information and 2009, we extendedhas independently validated our drilling campaign with an additional 5,179 meters atreported resources and reserves.
Snowden accepts as appropriate the estimates regarding proven and probable reserves made by us, totaling for Engenho mine and 2,771 meters at Fernandinho mine (totaling a campaign317 million tons of 7,950 meters) to increase and improve our knowledge about the iron ore deposits(as of December 31, 2014) at these mines. a grade of 39.48% Fe and 40.01% SiO2.
Table of contents In November 2012 we started a new drilling campaign with an additional 10,00011,899 meters in the Engenho Mine. Bymine. In this first stage we use drillings performed up until the end of October 2013. For Engenho we used 4,085 meters of this last campaign totaling 9,264 meters to report the first stage estimates. In the second stage (the drilling performed up until December, 2012,2014) we had drilled a total of 404 meters and we expect to conclude this campaign by December 2013. We also intend to conduct a drilling campaign of an additional 10,000will use 7,814 meters in the Fernandinho Mine in 2013. We expect that, as soon as a new model and final pit are finished (approximately in December 2013), this reserve can be audited and may be incorporated into our mineral deposits. We expect to have an audit reserve ready by late 2014.Engenho mine. Production Casa de Pedra The Casa de Pedra facilities are located in the city of Congonhas, in the State of Minas Gerais. The Casa de Pedra mine is located 350 km from the Presidente Vargas Steelworks and supplies iron ore products to our steel mill, as well as for export through the Itaguaí Port. Casa de Pedra’s equipment fleet and treatment facilities have an installed annual ROM capacity of approximately 86.0130 million tons and 2228 million tons, respectively. NamisaPires and Fernandinho Beneficiation Plants
Namisa has two beneficiation plants: onePires plant is the Pires Plant, whichbeneficiation plant of Congonhas Minérios. The plant receives material from our Engenho mine (located at the northern border of the Casa de Pedra mine) and the other is the Fernandinho Plant, which receives material from our Fernandinho mine (located in the city of Itabirito). The beneficiation plant at Pires also processes crude ore acquired from other companies, which along with its own ROM, generates final products such as: lump ore, small lump ore (hematitinha), sinter feed and concentrates. The beneficiation
Fernandinho plant atreceives material from Fernandinho mine (located in the city of Itabirito) generates sinter feed and fines as final products. Namisa complements our strategy to be a world leading producer of high quality iron ore. Namisa remains fully integrated with our railway and port logistics corridor, through long-term contracts, which provide sufficient railway and port logistics capacity for Namisa’s current and future production. Namisa is a leading company in iron ore mining and trading, with mining and processing operations in the State of Minas Gerais. Trading iron ore is obtained from small mining companies in the neighborhood and other trading companies.
The table below sets forth production of iron ore of our mines for the last three years: | Production(1) | Production1 | | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | Casa de Pedra (Mt) | 21.6 | 20.1 | 19.8 | | Casa de Pedra2 (Mt) | | 15.4 | 21.65 | 26.24 | Grade (%) | 65.6% | 65.3% | 64.4% | 63.80% | 63.80% | Pires (2) (Mt) | 6.1 | 5.7 | 4.1 | | Pires 2 (Mt) | | 3.4 | 3.8 | 1.6 | Grade (%) | 62.6% | 62.3% | 62.2% | 61.60% | 62.10% | 63.90% | Fernandinho(2) (Mt) | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.5 | | Fernandinho2 (Mt) | | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0 | Grade (%) | 59.6% | 58.6% | 57.4% | 59.40% | 59.50% | - |
(1) In addition to its own production, Namisa also purchasespurchased iron ore from third parties. Third party purchase volumes totaled 5.911.9 million tons, 7.58.3 million tons and 9.33.1 million tons in 2010, 20112013, 2014 and 2012,2015, respectively.
(2) Production information considers 100% of the mines, not just our 60% interest.mines.
Table Of Contents
| CSN Consolidated Sales(1) | CSN Consolidated Sales1 | | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 20152 | Consolidated Sales (Mt) | 18.6 | 23.8 | 20.2 | 25.67 | 28.88 | 25.67 | Consolidated Net Revenue Per Unit (US$/t) | 98 | 135 | 97 | 98 | 64 | 26.91 |
(1) Consolidated sales consider our proportional 60% interest in Namisa.100% of Namisa’s Sales Volume until November 2015. (2) Since December 2015, we have been considering 100% stake of Congonhas Minérios. Distribution Transportation costs are a significant component of our steel and iron ore production costs and are a factor in our price-competitiveness in the export market. Railway is the main means of transport by which we convey raw materials from our mines to the Presidente Vargas Steelworks and steel and iron ore products to ports for shipment overseas. Iron ore, limestone and dolomite from our two mines located in the State of Minas Gerais are transported by railroad to the Presidente Vargas Steelworks for processingforprocessing into steel. The distances from our mines to the Presidente Vargas Steelworks are 328 km and 455 km. The distances from our mines to the ports are 440 km and 160 km. Imported coal and coke bought from foreign suppliers are unloaded at the port of Itaguaí, 90 km west of the city of Rio de Janeiro, and shipped 109 km by train to the Presidente Vargas Steelworks. Our finished steel products are transported by train, truck and ships to our customers throughout Brazil and abroad. Our most important local markets are the cities of São Paulo (335 km from the Presidente Vargas Steelworks), Rio de Janeiro (120 km) and Belo Horizonte (429 km).
Table of contents Until recently, Brazil’s railway system (including railcars and tracks) was principally government-owned and in need of repair, but it has now been largely privatized. In an attempt to increase the reliability of our rail transportation, we hold interests in companies that hold concessions for the main railway systems we use. For further information on our railway concessions, see “—Facilities—Railways.” We export iron ore and import coal and coke through the Itaguaí Port, in the State of Rio de Janeiro. The coal and container terminals have been operated by us since August 1997 and 1998, respectively. Our Logistics Segment Our logistics segment is comprised of railway and port facilities. Railways Southeastern Railway System MRS has a 30-year concession to operate, through the year 2026 and renewable for an equal period of 30 years, Brazil’s Southeastern railway system. As of December 31, 2012,2015, we held 33.27%34.94% of MRS’MRS’s total capital. For more information see “Item 5E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements”. The Brazilian Southeastern railway system, with 1,643 km of track, serves the São Paulo - Rio de Janeiro - Belo Horizonte industrial triangle in Southeast Brazil, and links our mines located in the State of Minas Gerais to the ports located in the states of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro and to the steel mills of CSN, CompanhiaSiderúCompanhia Siderúrgica Paulista or Cosipa, and Gerdau Açominas. In addition to serving other customers, the linerailway transports iron ore from our mines at Casa de Pedra in the State of Minas Gerais and coke and coal from Itaguaí Port in the State of Rio de Janeiro to the Presidente Vargas Steelworks and transports our exports to the ports of Itaguaí and Rio de Janeiro. The railway system connects the Presidente Vargas Steelworks to the container terminal at Itaguaí Port, which handles most of our steel exports. Our transport volumes represent approximately 25%19% of the Brazilian Southeastern railway system’s total volume. We are jointly and severally liable, along with the other principal MRSmain MRS’s shareholders, for the full payment of the outstanding amount of its indebtedness (See “Item 5E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements”), however,. However we expect that MRS will make the lease payments through internally generated funds and proceeds from financing.
Table Of Contents
Northeastern Railway System As of December 31, 2012, weWe hold 76.13% of the capital stock of Transnordestina Logística S.A.. Transnordestina Logística S.A. has a 30-year concession grantedinterest in 1997, renewable for an equal 30-year period,companies that have concessions to operate Brazil’s Northeastern railway system. Thethe Northeastern railway system, includes 4,534 km of track andwhich operates in the states of Maranhão, Piauí, Ceará, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Alagoas and Rio Grande do Norte. It alsoNorte and connects with the region’s leading ports, thereby offering an important competitive advantage through opportunities for intermodal transportation solutions and made-to-measure logistics projects. Resolution No. 4,042/2013 issued by the transportation regulatory agency (Agência Nacional de Transportes Terrestres), or ANTT, authorized the partial spin-off of TLSA and, as a result, the Northeastern railway system is currently divided into the Railway System I, operated by FTL, and the Railway System II, operated by TLSA.
As of December 31, 2015, we held 89.79% of the capital stock of FTL, which has a concession to operate the Railway System I (which encompasses the stretches between the cities of São Luís – Mucuripe, Arrojado – Recife, Itabaiana – Cabedelo, Paula Cavalcante – Macau and Propiá – Jorge Lins) of Brazil’s Northeastern railway system until 2027, renewable for an additional 30 years. The Railway System I consists of 4,238 km of railways. As of December 31, 2015, R$98.7 million in concession payments were outstanding over the remaining 12 years of the concession.
Table of contents As of December 31, 2015, we held 56.92% of the capital stock of TLSA, which has a concession to construct and operate the Railway System II (which encompasses the stretches between Missão Velha – Salgueiro, Salgueiro – Trindade, Trindade – Eliseu Martins, Salgueiro – Porto de Suape and Missão Velha – Porto de Pecém) of Brazil’s Northeastern railway system. Once concluded, the Railway System II will have an extension of 1,753 km of tracks that will connect the interior of Northeast Brazil to Pecém and Suape Ports. This concession was granted in 1997 and recently had its original term extended until the earlier of 2057 or the date when TLSA reaches a rate of annual return of 6.75% of its total investment with monetary adjustments. For more information, on Transnordestina, see “Item 4D. Property, Plant and Equipment – Capital Expenditures – Planned Investments.5E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.” Port Facilities Solid Bulks Terminal We holdoperate an integrated and modern logistics structure. Part of this structure includes the operation of TECAR through a concession to operate TECAR, a solid bulks terminal, one of four terminals that form the Itaguaí Port, locatedrenewed in the State of Rio de Janeiro, for a term2015 and expiring in 2022 and renewable for another 25 years. Itaguaí Port, in turn,2047. TECAR is connected to road and rail systems across Southeastern Brazil and is one of the Presidente Vargas Steelworks, Casa de Pedrafour port terminals that make up the Port of Itaguaí facilities. With a strategic location and Namisaa total area of 740,761 m², the terminal consists of a concrete molded berthing pier superposed on jacketed stilts connected to the mainland by an access bridge perpendicular to the Southeastern Railway System. berthing pier. Its backyard includes conveyor belts, an internal road system, bulk storage yards, a railway looping, as well as industrial and administrative facilities. Our imports of coal and coke are madeand exports of iron ore occur through this terminal. Under the terms of the concession, we undertookhave the obligation to load and unloadship at least 3.0 million tons of bulk cargo annuallyand, as of 2020, we undertook to ship 38.4 million tons of iron ore annually. Among the approved investments, that we had previously announced iswas the development and expansion of the solid bulks terminal at Itaguaí, which phase 1 expansion to also handle up to 8445 million tons of iron ore per year.year was completed in 2013. For further information, see “Item 4. Information on the Company - “—D. Property, Plant and Equipment —PlannedEquipment—Planned Investments—Mining.” Container Terminal We own 99.99% of Sepetiba Tecon S.A., or TECON, which has a concession to operate the container terminal at Itaguaí Port for a 25-year term expiring in 2026, that is renewable for another 25 years, the container terminal at Itaguaí Port.years. As of December 31, 2012, US$1522015, approximately U.S.$69 million of the cost of the concession remained payable over the next 1411 years of the lease.contract. For more information, see “Item 5E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements”.Arrangements.” The Itaguaí Port is located in Brazil’s Southeast Region, with all major exporting and importing areas of the states of São Paulo, Minas Gerais and Rio de Janeiro within 500 km from the port. This area representsrepresented more than 50%55% of the Brazilian gross domestic product, or GDP, in 2014 according to the Brazilian Geography and Statistics Institute (Instituto(Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística)stica). The Brazilian Federal Port Agency has spent more than US$48 million in the past few yearsmade investments in port infrastructure projects such as expanding the maritime access channel to the Itaguaí Port and increasing its depth. In addition, significant investments were made by the Brazilian federal government in adding two extra lanes to the Rio-Santos road, and are being made in constructing the Rio de Janeiro Metropolitan Bypass, (ongoing project), a beltway that will crosscrosses the Rio de Janeiro metropolitan area. These factors, combined with favorable natural conditions, like natural deep waters and a low urbanization rate around the port area, allow the operation of large vessels as well as highly competitive prices for all services rendered, resulting in the terminal being a major hub port in Brazil.
Table Of Contents
Investments made from 2007 to 2012, mainly in two Super Post Panamax Portainers and two Rubber Tired Gantry, or RTG, cranes, 6 new Reach Stackers and 8 forklifts, among others, have shown to be successful. Theseinvestments, along with a focused marketing and sales strategy, enabled the terminal to rank first in market share among the three terminals of the state of Rio de Janeiro in 2012, with 38% of the total moves in those terminals.
We are carrying out newhave invested in infrastructure and equipment investments inat Sepetiba TECON, such as the Berth 301 Equalization, and the acquisition of two new Super Post Panamax PortainersShip-to-Shore Cranes and four new RTG cranes tofor yard operations. In 2012, we carried outoperations, that were delivered in the first quarter of 2014. These investments, along with the previous ones, like the dredging of Sepetiba Tecon’s Berths 302/303 and access channel to ‑15.5 m depth. These investments will increase‑15.5m depth, increased TECON’s capacity from 320,000 containers (or 480,000 TEUs) to 410,000440,000 containers (or 610,000660,000 TEUs) per yearyear.
Table of contents In 2015, there was a decrease in the volume of containers operated by the terminal, which handled 151,823 units, a decrease of almost 12% compared to 2014, when we handled 172,736 units. The impact, however, was mitigated because, despite the Brazilian economic crisis, the terminal was able to attract two new container service calls (Asia and from 2.0 millionGulf of Mexico/USA). On the other hand, we exported 926,155 tons to 6.0 million tons per year of steel products. We intend to use this port to ship all our exports of steel products. In 2012, 58% of the exported steel products (or 83,466 tons), were shipped from this port, as compared to 83% in 2011. In 2012, the terminal continued to grow, following a 10% growth in 2011. It achieved 216,460 units handled (or 329,072 TEUs),2015, an increase of 2% as154% compared to 2011,364,053 tons in 2014, breaking a less significant figure due5-year record especially as a result of a combination of low domestic demand and favorable exchange rates . We also increased the operations of other cargoes, reaching a volume of 205,834 tons, compared to the limitations generated by the equalization work performed on Berth 301.110,348 tons in 2014.
Our Cement Segment Our cement segment is comprised of a cement plant in Volta Redonda, in the state of Rio de Janeiro, and a clinker plant in Arcos, in the state of Minas Gerais. In 2015, two new crushing facilities were delivered in Arcos, increasing its annual capacity by 2.2 million tons of cement. With the implementation of the new clinker kiln in Arcos (MG), scheduled for 2016, CSN will achieve self-sufficiency in the production of this raw material. Production The cement production process in CSN’s cement factory inis held at Volta Redonda and Arcos and begins with the influx of raw materials: clinker, limestone, gypsum and slag. We currently importconsume clinker but, with the startup ofproduced in our clinker plant in Arcos in mid-2011, imports are gradually being reduced.and eventually we import clinker to supply demand. Limestone comes from Arcos by rail. Clinker is stored in a silo (capacity: 45,000 tons) and limestone in a warehouse (capacity: 10,000 tons). Slag is a by-product of iron and steel, produced in the blast furnace, and is also stored in the warehouse, (capacity: 20,000 tons), arriving at the plant by road. CSN uses natural gypsum, from Ouricuri, in the state of Pernambuco, which arrives at the plant by truck and is stored in the warehouse (capacity: 10,000 tons).warehouse. All transportation of raw materials within the plant is carried out by conveyor belts, placing inputs in scales according to a predefined formula and delivering them to the mills. There are two grinding lines and each mill has a nominal capacity of 170 tons/h. Annual plant capacity is 2.4 million tons of cement. The mill has a hydropneumatichydraulic roller system, which uses pressure to grind the layer of material on the turntable. Hot gas, derived from the combustion of natural gas or petroleum coke, is pumped intoused in the mills to maintain the proper temperature in the circuit.dry materials. The typetypes of cement we produce isare: CP III-40 RS, (Sulfator resistant), which is then taken through a bucket elevator to be storedCP II-E-32 and CP II-E-40 in silos.bagged and bulk forms. The plant has four silos, two of them with 10,000 tons of capacity and two with 5,000 tons of capacity. Cement can be shippedin bagged and bulk forms.forms. We have two baggers with 12 filling nozzles (nominal capacity of 36003,600 bags/hour) and two palletizers for bagging cement. Our Energy Segment Our energy segment is comprised of generation plants and is aimed at enabling us to maintain our self-sufficiency in energy, reducing our production cost and our exposure to fluctuations or availability of certain energy sources. Our energy related assets include: Thermoelectric Co-Generation Power Plant We completed the construction of a 238235.2 MW thermoelectric co-generation power plant at the Presidente Vargas Steelworks in December 1999. Since October 2000, the plant has provided the steelworks with approximately 60% of the electric energy needed in its steel mills. Aside from operational improvements, the power plant supplies our strip mills with electric energy, processed steam and forced air from the blast furnaces, benefiting the surrounding environment through the elimination of flares that burn steel-processing gases into the atmosphere. In addition, we installed a new turbine generator in 2014, which added 21 MW to our existing installed capacity. This turbine is located near our Blast Furnace No. 3, and uses the outlet gases from the iron making process to generate energy.
Table Of Contents
Itá Hydroelectric Facility Tractebel and CSN each own 48.75% of ITASA, a special-purpose company formed for the purpose of owning and operating, under a 30-year concession granted in 2000, and renewable for an equal term, 60.5% of the Itá hydroelectric facilityhydroelectricfacility on the Uruguay river in Southern Brazil. Companhia de Cimento Itambé, or Itambé, owns the remaining 2.5% of ITASA. Tractebel directly owns the remaining 39.5% of the Itá hydroelectric facility.
Table of contents The power facility was built using a project finance structure with an investment of approximately US$U.S.$860 million. The long-term financing for the project was closed in March 2001 and consisted of US$U.S.$78 million in debentures issued by ITASA, a US$U.S.$144 million loan from private banks and US$U.S.$116 million of direct financing from BNDES, all of which are due bywere paid in February 2013. The sponsors of the project have invested approximately US$U.S.$306 million in this project. Itá has an installed capacity of 1,450 MW, with a firm guaranteed output of 668 MW, and became fully operational in March 2001. We and the other shareholders of ITASA have the right to take our pro rata share (proportional to our ownership interest in the project) of Itá’s output pursuant to 30-year power purchase agreements at a fixed price per megawatt hour, adjusted annually for inflation. Since October 2002, we have been using our entire Itá take internally. Igarapava Hydroelectric Facility We own 17.9% of a consortium that built and has the right to operate for 30 years the Igarapava hydroelectric facility. Other consortium members are Vale, Companhia Mineira de Metais,Aliança, Votorantim Metais Zinco and AngloGold Ashanti Mineração Ltda., and Companhia Energética de Minas Gerais, or CEMIG.The The planthas an installed capacity of 210 MW, corresponding to 136 MW of firm guaranteed output as of December 31, 2012.output. We have been using part of our 22.823 MW take from Igarapava to supply energy to the Casa de Pedra and Arcos mines and to the Presidente Vargas Steelworks.our other units. Marketing Organization and Strategy Flat Steel Our steel products are sold both domestically and abroad as a main raw material for several different manufacturing industries, including the automotive, home appliance, packaging, construction and steel processing industries. Our sales approach is to establish brand loyalty and achieve a reputation for quality products by developing relationships with our clients and focusing on their specific needs, providing tailor-made solutions for each of our clients. Our commercial area is responsible for sales of all of our products. This area is divided into two major teams, one focused on international sales and the other on domestic sales. The domestic market oriented sales team is divided into seven market segments: Packaging, Distribution Network, Automotive Industry (Automakers and Auto Parts), Home Appliances, Original Equipment Manufacturer, or OEM, Construction and Pipes. The commercial area also has a team called “Special Sales” which is responsible for selling all the process residues, such as blast furnace slag, pitch and ammonia, which are widely used as inputs in chemical and cement industries. The Distribution Network division is responsible for supplying large steel processors and distributors. Besides the independent distributors, CSN also has its own distributor, called Prada Distribuição. The Pipes division supplies oil and gas pipe manufacturers as well as some industries that produce small diameter pipe and light profiles. The Packaging unit acts in an integrated way with suppliers, representatives of the canning industry and distributors to respond to customer needs for finished-products. The Automotive unit is supplied by a specialized mill, CSN Porto Real, and also by a portion of the galvanized material produced at Presidente Vargas Steelworks, benefitting from a combined sales strategy. In 2012, about 65% of our domestic sales were made through our own sales force directly to customers. The remaining sales were to independent distributors for subsequent resale to smaller clients.
Table Of Contents
Historically, our export sales were made primarily through international brokers. However, as part of our strategy to establish direct, longer-term relationships with end-users, we have decreased our reliance on such brokers. We have focused our international sales on more profitable markets in order to maximize revenues and shareholder returns. All of our sales are on an order-by-order basis and have an average delivery time of 45 days. As a result, our production levels closely reflect our order log book status. We forecast sales trends in both the domesticthedomestic and export markets based on the historical data available and the general economic outlook for the near future. We have our own data systems to remain informed of worldwide and Brazilian market developments. Further, our management believes that one of the keys to our success is maintaining a presence in the export market. Such presence gives us the flexibility to shift between domestic and export markets, thereby allowing us to maximize our profitability.
Table of contents Unlike with other commodity products, there is no exchange trading of steel, or uniform pricing, as wide differences exist in terms of size, quality and specifications. In general, exports are priced based on international spot prices of steel at the time of sale in U.S. dollars or Euros, depending on the destination. Sales are normally paid up front, or within 14 or 28 days, and, in the case of exports, usually backed by a letter of credit and an insurance policy. Sales are made primarily on cost and freight terms. Sales by Geographic Region
In 2012,2015, we sold steel products to customers in Brazil as well as to customers in 2532 other countries. The fluctuations in the portion of total sales assigned to domestic and international markets, which can be seen in the table below, reflect our ability to adjust sales in light of variations in the domestic and international economies, as well as steel demand and prices, both domestically and abroad. The
The two main export markets for our products are North America and Europe, representing 44%approximately 70% and 40%18%, respectively, of our export sales volume in 2012.2015. In North America, we take advantage ofutilize our subsidiary CSN LLC, which acts as a commercial channel for our products. In order to gain a cost advantage among our U.S. competitors, CSN is able to exporthas historically shipped hot-rolled to CSN LLC which is then processed and transformed into more value-added products at CSN LLC’s plant, such as cold-rolled coil and galvanized. Moreover, we are able to export cold-rolled coils which can be directly sold or processed by CSN LLC in order to manufacture galvanized products. CSN – Sales of Steel Products by Destination | | CSN – Sales of All Steel Products by Destination | | CSN – Sales of All Steel Products by Destination | (In thousands of metric tons and millions of R$) | (In thousands of metric tons and millions of R$) | (In thousands of metric tons and millions of R$) | | | | | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | | Tons | % of Total | Net Operating Revenues(2) | % of Total | Tons | % of Total | Net Operating Revenues(2) | % of Total | Tons | % of Total | Net Operating Revenues(2) | % of Total | Tons | % of Total | Net Operating Revenues(2) | % of Total | Tons | % of Total | Net Operating Revenues(2) | % of Total | Tons | % of Total | Net Operating Revenues(2) | % of Total | Brazil | 4,495 | 77.1% | 8,338 | 78.5% | 4,216 | 86.1% | 8,033 | 86.8% | 4,135 | 86.2% | 8,575 | 88.6% | 2,968 | 59.50% | 6,612 | 60.40% | 3,718 | 72.00% | 8,493 | 75.40% | 4,650 | 76.00% | 9,529 | 78.50% | Export | 1,334 | 22.9% | 2,278 | 21.5% | 680 | 13.9% | 1,219 | 13.2% | 661 | 13.8% | 1,107 | 11.4% | 2,022 | 40.50% | 4,332 | 39.60% | 1,460 | 28.00% | 2,764 | 24.60% | 1,467 | 24.00% | 2,603 | 21.50% | Total | 5,829 | 100.0% | 10,616 | 100.0% | 4,896 | 100.0% | 9,252 | 100.0% | 4,796 | 100.0% | 9,682 | 100.0% | 4,990 | 100% | 10,944 | 100% | 5,117 | 100% | 11,257 | 100% | 6,117 | 100% | 12,132 | 100% | Exports by Region | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Asia | 17 | 1.3% | 31 | 1.3% | 21 | 0.4% | 31 | 0.3% | 28 | 0.6% | 38 | 0.4% | 9 | 0% | 17 | 0% | 48 | 3.20% | 78 | 2.80% | 30 | 2.10% | 45 | 1.70% | North America(1) | 289 | 21.7% | 552 | 24.2% | 270 | 5.5% | 473 | 5.1% | 268 | 5.6% | 434 | 4.5% | 802 | 39.70% | 1,834 | 42.30% | 289 | 19.70% | 669 | 24.20% | 298 | 20.30% | 597 | 22.90% | Latin America | 81 | 6.1% | 199 | 8.8% | 58 | 1.2% | 144 | 1.6% | 56 | 1.2% | 136 | 1.4% | 115 | 5.70% | 376 | 8.70% | 59 | 4.00% | 161 | 5.80% | 59 | 4.00% | 148 | 5.70% | Europe | 942 | 70.6% | 1,484 | 65.2% | 312 | 6.4% | 545 | 5.9% | 277 | 5.8% | 434 | 4.5% | 1,090 | 53.90% | 2,087 | 48.20% | 1,057 | 72.10% | 1,840 | 66.60% | 1,071 | 73.00% | 1,793 | 68.90% | All Others | 5 | 0.3% | 12 | 0.5% | 19 | 0.4% | 27 | 0.3% | 32 | 0.7% | 65 | 0.7% | 7 | 0% | 18 | 0% | 7 | 0.50% | 16 | 0.60% | 9 | 0.60% | 21 | 0.80% |
_______________ (1) Sales to Mexico are included in North America. (2) Net operating revenues presented above differ from amounts in our IFRS consolidated financial statements because they do not include revenues from non-steel products (non-steel products include mainly by-products, iron ore, logistics services and cement).
Table Of Contents
Sales by Product The following table sets forth our market shares for steel sales in Brazil of hot-rolled, cold-rolled, galvanized and tin mill products for 2011, 20102015, 2014 and 2009. Market share information for 2012 was not yet available as2013.
Table of the date of this annual report.contents CSN Domestic Market Share | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | Hot-Rolled Products | 66.3% | 60.7% | 53.4% | Cold-Rolled Products | 34.8% | 29.5% | 30.9% | Galvanized Products | 45.5% | 47.1% | 47.0% | Tin Mill Products | 98.2% | 96.8% | 86.1% |
CSN Domestic Market Share | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | Hot-Rolled Products | 36% | 41% | 45% | Cold-Rolled Products | 19% | 18% | 17% | Galvanized Products | 28% | 28% | 27% | Tin Mill Products | 12% | 11% | 11% | Long Steel | 5% | 1% | - |
Soutce: IABr and CSN data
Sales by Industry We sell our steel products to manufacturers in several industries. The table below shows our domestic shipments breakdown by volume for the last three years among our market segments: Sales by Industrial Segment in Brazil
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | | (In percentages of total domestic volume shipped) | (In percentages of total domestic volume shipped) | Distribution Network | 42% | 41% | 45% | 37% | 44% | Packaging | 8% | 9% | 10% | 13% | 11% | 8% | Automotive | 16% | 19% | 11% | 18% | 17% | Home Appliances | 7% | 9% | 7% | OEM | 6% | 5% | 4% | 5% | Construction | 21% | 17% | 18% | 21% | 20% | | | | |
We believe we have a particularly strong domestic and export position in the sale of tin mill products used for packaging in Latin America. Our customers for these products include some of the world’s most important food processing companies, as well as many small and medium-sized entities. We also maintain a strong position in the sale of galvanized products for use in the automobile manufacturing, construction and home appliance industries in Brazil and abroad, supplied by CSN Porto Real and CSN Paraná.No single customer accounts for more than 10% of our net operating revenues.revenues. For further information on steel sales, see “Item 5A. Operating Results - Results—Steel Markets and Product Mix -Mix— Sales Volume and Net Operating Revenues by Steel Products and Markets” and “Item 5A. Operating Results -Results— Results of Operations - Operations—Year 20112015 Compared to Year 2010 – 2014—Net Operating Revenues”Revenues.”
Seasonality Steel demand is stronger in the second quarter of the year and weaker in the last quarter. Nevertheless, our production is continuous throughout the year.year.
Long Steel – SWT Our long steel products are sold both in Germany (about 30%) and other countries, mainly in Europe (60%), for industrial, infrastructure, civil construction and engineering industries. Our sales approach is to establish brand loyalty and to maintain our reputation of high quality products and excellent delivery performance by developing long term relationships with our clients. SWT focuses on meeting specific customer needs, developing solutions for both low temperature and high temperature resistant applications, as well as optimized section shapes for special applications.
applications. Table Of Contents
Our commercial area is responsible for sales of all of our products worldwide. This area is divided into the direct sales team which is organized in 13 agencies situatedlocated in Germany and our core markets in Europe, the commercial back office department (order management from entry via tracking to the final delivery and invoicing), logistics contracting (truck, rail, vessel, maritime, inventory worldwide) and a rail logistics department. SWT does not possess its own distribution network, instead cooperating with the big steel distributors and traders in Europe and other countries. All of our sales are on an order-by-order basis. The delivery time is related to the logistics chain and varies between 2 to 6 weeks depending on Incoterm and section type.sectiontype. As a result, our production levels closely reflect our order log book status. We forecast sales trends in both the European and export markets based on the historical data available from the last two years and the general economic outlook for the near future. We believe that our presence in the export market outside of Europe gives us more flexibility to optimize production and maximize our profitability.
Table of contents Sections are not sold based on uniform pricing in Europe, as wide differences exist in terms of size, quality and specifications. In general, exports are priced based on international spot prices of steel at the time of sale in U.S. dollars or Euros, depending on the destination. Sales are normally paid within 30 days, and, in the case of exports, usually backed by a letter of credit and an insurance policy. All SWT businesses are 100% covered by EulerHermes risk insurance, a bank guarantee or a letter of credit. Sales are made primarily on cost and freight terms. Long Steel – Volta Redonda In 2013, CSN started the production of long steel in Volta Redonda.This plant has production capacity of 500kt/y when fully operational,providing the domestic market with products for civil and industrial construction. Divided in wire rod, rebar CSN 50 and rebar CSN 25, the products were developed using high technology and in accordance with the highest quality and sustainability standards, with all tradition and reliability of our products. The commercial team is comprised of its own sales force ready to meet all the needs of the market, not only the needs of small clients, but also the needs of large wholesales. Following the model already successfully deployed by us, in which we seek a diversified and pulverized service to our customers, we will be able to count on a real partner to boost our business. In order to optimize the process, the product’s outflow will be made in operational synergy with the flat steel units, using the same distribution centers, strategically located so as to deliver to all national territory. This is another addition for the products from our portfolio, which is already comprised of cement, structural section products derived by flat steel, such as tile, tube, among others, so as to offer a portfolio that thoroughly covers the civil construction segment. Iron Ore Iron ore products are commercialized by our commercial team located in Brazil and overseas. In Europe and Asia, our offices also include our technical assistance management. These three marketing units allow us to stay inmaintain close contactrelations with our customers worldwide, understand the environment where they operate, monitor their requirements and provide all necessary assistance in a short period of time. Market intelligence analysis, planning and administration of sales are handled from Brazil by the staff in our São Paulo office, while our domestic sales team is located at Casa de Pedra mine, in the State of Minas Gerais. We supply our iron ore to the steel industry and our main targets are the Brazilian, European, Middle Eastern and Asian markets. Prevailing and expected levels of demand for steel products directly affect demand for iron ore. Demand for steel products is correlated to many factors, such as GDP, global manufacturing production, urbanization, civil construction and infrastructure spending. We believe our competitiveness has been improved by our customer service and market intelligence. It is paramount for us to have a clear understanding of our customers’ businesses in order to address their needs, surpass their expectations and build long-term relationships. We have a customer-oriented marketing policy and specialized local personnel in direct contact with our clients in order to help determine the mix that best suits each particular customer.client. CSN – Sales of Iron Ore Products by Destination | (In thousands of metric tons and millions of R$) | | | | 2015 | | | | 2014 | | | | 2013 | | | Tons | % of total | Net Operating Revenues | % of total | Tons | % of total | Net Operating Revenues | % of total | Tons | % of total | Net Operating Revenues | % of total | Brazil | 538,592 | 2.30% | 175,223 | 5.50% | 138,436 | 0.50% | 306,837 | 7.50% | 157,041 | 0.70% | 679,974 | 13% | Export | 23,322,408 | 97.70% | 3,012,027 | 94.50% | 25,106,988 | 99.50% | 3,802,566 | 92.50% | 21,377,106 | 99.30% | 4,616,754 | 87% | Total | 23,861,003 | 100% | 3,187,250 | 100% | 25,245,424 | 100% | 4,109,403 | 100% | 21,534,147 | 100% | 5,296,728 | 100% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Exports to | | | | | | | | | | | | | Asia | 21,963,324 | 95% | 2,836,505 | 95% | 24,334,337 | 97% | 3.674.778 | 97% | 16,956,231 | 79.30% | 3.610.625 | 78% | North America | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | | - | | - | Europe | 1,028,221 | 4% | 132,792 | 4% | 772,651 | 3% | 127.788 | 3% | 4,420,875 | 20.70% | 1.006.129 | 22% | Latin America | 330,861 | 1% | 42,730 | 1% | | | | | | | | |
(*) Iron ore sales volumes presented in this table take into consideration sales by CSN and by our subsidiaries and jointly controlled entities proportionally to our interest (Namisa 60% until November 2015 and 100% stake in Congonhas Minérios as of December 2015).
Iron Ore SalesTable of contents
| | CSN – Sales of Iron Ore Products by Destination (In thousands of metric tons and millions of R$) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Brazil | 478,626 | 2.4% | 713,445 | 15.9% | 1,457,381 | 6.1% | 834,144 | 14.0% | 1,519,562 | 8.2% | 573,976 | 15.9% | Export | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total | | | | | | | | | | | | | Exports by Region | | | | | | | | | | | | | Asia | 15,230,579 | 77.3% | 2,971,131 | 78.8% | 18,815,484 | 84.0% | 4,250,002 | 83.2% | 14,140,642 | 83.0% | 2,513,499 | 82.6% | North America | 94,942 | 0.5% | 16,589 | 0.4% | - | 0.0% | - | 0.0% | - | 0.0% | - | 0.0% | Europe | 4,377,173 | 22.2% | 784,384 | 24.1% | 3,576,648 | 16.0% | 857,705 | 16.8% | 2,894,780 | 17.0% | 527,667 | 17.4% | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The first step to our entry into the international iron ore market was taken in February 2007, with the completion of the first phase of the expansion of our coal seaport terminal in Itaguaí, in the State of Rio de Janeiro,which enabled us to also handle and export iron ore and to load from our own facilities the first shipment of our iron ore products.
Table Of Contents
In 2012, CSN’s2015, our iron ore sales reached 20.225.7 million tons, a 15% decrease of 11% compared to 2011.2014. According to our consolidated financial statements, total mining net revenue decreased 23%22% over the past year, mainly due to declininglower iron ore prices. The share of mining segment revenue in CSN's total net revenue decreased from 35%25% in 20112014 to 26%19% in 2012.2015. In 2012, 65%2015, 95% of our iron ore export sales went to the Asian market, mainly China 22%and 4% were sold in the European market and the remaining 13% were sold to other countries mainly in the Middle East.market. Of our total sales, 78%72% were sinter feed, 14%13% pellet feed, 4%7% lump ore and 4%8% concentrated. We expect the iron ore market to maintain a bullish trend supported by growing emerging market demand, high cost Chinese production, and infrastructure bottlenecks for low cost producers. The continued urbanization process in regions such as India, the Middle East, Latin America and China should support this tendency.
As global iron ore markets are highly competitive, we focus on our flexibility, reliability and efficient manner of supplying iron ore to the world market. Through our marketing offices, we have long termlong-term relationships with most players in the steel industry in China, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, Europe and Brazil. For further information on iron ore sales, see “Item 5A. Operating Results - Results of Operations - Year 2012 Compared to Year 2011 – Net Operating Revenues.”
Cement We sell cement type CPIII 40 RSCP III-40, CP II-E-32 and CP II-E-40 in bagged and bulk forms and import CPII F.forms. We operate in the markets of Rio de Janeiro, Minas Gerais São Paulo and the northeast region (with imported cement).Sao Paulo. With the purpose of expanding and increasing competitiveness, we own sixeleven distribution centers located in strategic points: three in São Paulo, twofour in Rio de Janeiro and onefour in Minas Gerais. Supply to these distribution centers is made through railways and road transport, using mainly the MRS railway. We have a diverse client base of over 10,000approximately 18,000 clients, including construction material stores, home centers, concrete producers, construction companies, mortar industries and cement artifact producers. The focus of our sales strategy is on retail. In this segment, we have a strong presence in sales points, where we reinforce the quality of the product to final customers. The retail segment operates with a low levellowlevel of inventory, and a significant percentage of repurchase in the month, which highlights the competitive advantage of CSN’s distribution centers.
Table of contents In 2012,2015, amid the ongoing Brazilian economics crisis, we significantlymarginally increased our sales, reaching 1,972 thousand2,182 thousands tons, representingmarking a growth of 12.4%3% when compared to 2011.2014. All our cement production is sold in the localdomestic market. | CSN – Sales of Cement by Destination (In thousands of metric tons and millions of R$) | | | | | | | | | | | | Brazil | 1,972 | 388 | 1,755 | 333 | 992 | 202 |
| CSN – Cement Sales Figures(In thousands of metric tons and millions of R$) | | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | | Tons | Net Operating Revenues | Tons | Net Operating Revenues | Tons | Net Operating Revenues | Brazil | 2,182 | 432 | 2,185 | 440 | 2,045 | 415 |
Insurance We and our subsidiaries maintain several types of insurance policies. These insurances are contracted in line with the risk management of our business and attempt to follow the market practices for similar activities. Coverage in such policies encompasses domestic and international (import and export) cargo transportation (by road, rail, sea or air), carrier liability, life insurance, personal accidents, health, auto insurance, D&O, generalliability,general liability, erection risks, boiler and machinery coverage, exporttrade credit insurance, surety, named perils, ports and terminal liabilities. These policies may not be sufficient to cover all risks we are exposed to.
Table Of Contents
We also have an insurance policy covering the operational risks, material damages and loss of profits of theour following CSN’s branches and subsidiaries: Presidente Vargas Steelworks, Casa de Pedra Mine, Arcos Mine, Paraná Branch, CSN Porto Real (former Galvasud), Coal Terminal TECAR,Congonhas Minério, Container Terminal Sepetiba TECON, Namisa, CSN Handel, Namisa Handel and CSN Cimentos.Mining. This policy was negotiated with domestic and foreign insurers and reinsurers and is valid until June 30, 2013September30, 2016 for a total insured value of US$500U.S.$600 million (out of a total risk amount of US$17.7U.S.$11.1 billion). Under the terms of the policy, CSN remainswe remain responsible for the first tranche of US$300U.S.$375 million in losses (material damages and loss of profits). Intellectual Property We possessmaintain a special unit for managing the intellectual property rights which include: trademarks, patents and have technicalindustrial designs, ensuring adequate protection for the company and the possibility of commercialization, through technology transfer agreements the results of our innovation developments. We also maintain cooperation agreements with universities and research institutes that provide us with specialfor the exchange of technical reportscooperation and advicedevelopments related to specific productsnew processes and processes. We are not dependent on any/ or products.
Table of such patents or agreements for the commercialization of our products.contents Competition in the Steel Industry Both the worldwide and the Brazilian steel markets are intensely competitive. The primary competitive factors in these markets include quality, price, payment terms and customer service. Further, continuous advances in materials, sciences and resulting technologies have given rise to improvements in products such as plastics, aluminum, ceramics, glass and concrete, permitting them to serve as substitutes for steel for certain purposes. Competition in the Brazilian Steel Industry The primary competitive factors in the domestic market include quality, price, payment terms and customer service. Also, several foreign steel companies are significant investors in Brazilian steel mills. The following table sets forth the production of crude steel by Brazilian companies for the years indicated(2)(1): | | 2011 | | 2010 | | 2009 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ranking | | Production | | Ranking | | Production | | Ranking | | Production | | Ranking | | Production | | Ranking | | Production | | Ranking | | Production | | | (In million tons) | | (In million tons) | | (In million tons) | | (In million tons) | | (In million tons) | | | (In million tons) | Gerdau(1)(2) | | 1 | | 8.8 | | 1 | | 8.2 | | 1 | | 6.1 | | 1 | | 7.5 | | 1 | | 8.1 | | 1 | | 8.2 | Usiminas | | 2 | | 6.7 | | 2 | | 7.3 | | 2 | | 5.6 | | 2 | | 6.1 | | 2 | | 6.9 | | 2 | | 7.2 | ArcelorMittal Tubarão | | 3 | | 5.4 | | 3 | | 6.0 | | 3 | | 5.3 | | 3 | | 5.4 | | 4 | | 4.4 | | 4 | | 4.4 | CSN | | 4 | | 4.9 | | 4 | | 4.9 | | 4 | | 4.4 | | 4 | | 4.5 | | 3 | | 4.5 | | 3 | | 4.8 | ArcelorMittal Aços Longos | | 5 | | 3.5 | | 5 | | 3.4 | | 5 | | 3.2 | | 5 | | 3.3 | | 5 | | 3.5 | | 5 | | 3.4 | Others | | | | 5.9 | | 3.1 | | | | 1.9 | | | | 7.1 | | | | 6.8 | | | | 6.5 | Total | | 35.2 | | 32.9 | | 26.5 | | 33.9 | | 34.2 | | | 34.5 | Source: IABr | | | | | | | | |
1. Data from Aços Villares have been merged into data from Gerdau.
2.Information for 2012 was not yet available as of the date of this annual report
|
1.Information for 2015 was not yet available as of the date of this annual report. 2.Data from Aços Villares have been merged into data from Gerdau. Competitive Position — Global During 2012,2015, Brazil maintained its place as the largest producer of crude steel in Latin America, with a production output of 34.733.2 million tons and a 2.3%2.1% share of total world production, according to data from the World Steel Association, or WSA. In 2012,2015, Brazil also maintained its position as the ninth largest steel producer globally, accounting for around three-quartershalf of total production in Latin America, approximately twice the size of Mexico’s or 40%42% of the U.S.’ steel production, according to data from the WSA. According to IABr, Brazilian exports in 20122015 amounted to 8.613.7 million tons of finished and semi-finished steel products.
Table Of Contents
products, increased by 40% compared to 2014. We compete on a global basis with the world’s leading steel manufacturers. We have positioned ourselves in the world market with a product mix characterized by high margin and strong demand, such as tin plate and galvanized products. We have relatively low-cost and sufficient availability of labor and energy, and own high-grade iron ore reserves. These global market advantages are partially offset by costs of transporting steel throughout the world, usually by ship. Shipping costs, while helping to protect our domestic market, put pressure on our export price. To maintain our position in the world steel market in light of the highly competitive international environment with respect to price, our product quality and customer service must be maintained at a high level. See “Item 4B. Business Overview—Government Regulation and Other Legal Matters—Proceedings Related to Protectionist Measures” for a description of protectionist measures being taken by steel-importing countries that could negatively impact our competitive position.
Table of contents Competitive Advantages of the Brazilian Steel Industry Brazil’s principal competitive advantages are its abundant supply of low-cost, high-grade iron ore and energy resources. Brazil also benefits from a vast internal market with a large growth potential, a privatized industry making investments in plant and equipment, and deep water ports allowing the operation of large ships, which facilitates access to export markets. Brazilian domestic steel prices have historically been higher than its export prices. However, in 2010 and 2011, lower demand in mature markets, the appreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar, certain tax incentives, and imported steel products forced Brazilian producers to adjust prices closer to export price levels in order to maintain competitiveness. In 2012, with the slowdowndepreciation of Europeanthe real against the U.S. dollar and protective government measures which raised taxes on steel imports, export prices fell and domestic prices increase again. Despite the increase in the overall steel sheet demand in 2013, prices in the USA, Germany and China decreased by 5.2% compared to 2012 while, in 2014, the global average sheet prices decreased by 4.3% compared to 2013. In 2015, due to the depreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar exportand lower domestic demand, sales in the external market became more attractive and the Brazilian exports of flat products has increased 64%, while imports decreased 21% compared with the same period in 2014. The global steel overcapacity and the exchange rate volatility approximate the domestic to the international steel prices, fell and domestic prices rose again. This movement was also influenced by protective government measures which raised taxes on steel imports.is expected to continue in the short term. Government Regulation and Other Legal Matters Environmental Regulation We are subject to Brazilian federal, state and municipal environmental laws and regulations governing air emissions, waste water discharges, and solid and hazardous waste handling and disposal.disposal, wildlife management, forest maintenance, dangerous products transportation, and preservation of traditional communities. We are committed to controlling the substantial environmental impact caused by our steelmaking, mining, cement and logistics operations, in accordance with international standards and in compliance with environmental laws and regulations in Brazil. We believe currently we are currentlylargely in substantial compliance with applicable environmental requirements. While the Brazilian government has authority to promulgate environmental regulations setting forth minimum standards of environmental protection, state and local governments have the power to enact more stringent environmental regulations. We are subject to regulation and supervision by the Brazilian Ministry of Environment, the Environmental National Council, (“CONAMA”),or CONAMA, which is the Federalfederal body responsible for enacting technical regulations and environmental protection standards, and by the Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources, (“IBAMA”),or IBAMA, which is responsible for enforcing environmental laws at the federal level. The environmental regulations of the State of Rio de Janeiro, in which the Presidente Vargas Steelworks (UPV) is located, are enforced by the State Institute of Environment (“INEA”).INEA. In the state of Minas Gerais, where our main mining operation isoperations are located, we are subject to regulationregulations and supervision by the Environmental Policy Council, (“COPAM”)or COPAM, by the Regional Superintendent of Environment and Sustainable Development, or SUPRAM-CM, the Water Management Institute of Minas Gerais, or IGAM, the State Forestry Institute, or IEF, and the State Environmental Foundation, (“FEAM”).or FEAM, which are the competent bodies of the Secretary of State for the Environment and Sustainable Development of Minas Gerais, or SEMAD. Specific goals and standards are established in operating permits or environmental accords issued to each company or plant. These specific operationoperational conditions complement the standards and regulations of general applicability and are required to be observed throughout the lifeduration of the permit or accord. The terms of such operating permits are subject to change and are likely to become stricter. All of our facilities currently have or are in the process of obtaining/renewing their operating permits. In recent years, we requested and/or obtained several emissions permits and renewals of environmental permits, both for our current operations and for the development of new projects regarding steel and cement manufacturing, iron ore and limestone mining and logistics.
Table Of Contentsof contents Environmental Expenditures and Claims Promoting responsible environmental and social management is part of our business. We prioritize processes and equipment that offer modern and reliable technologies on environmental risks monitoring and control. We operate a corporate environmental department managed by a corporate environmental department under an Environmental Management System, or EMS, compliant with ISO 14001:2004 requirements. In addition, we have established (i) an internal committee for environmental management composed of professionals from different departments of CSN’s units, whose goal is to regularly discuss any problems that may arise and to identify risks and aspects of the operations in which the group can act pro-actively in order to prevent possible environmental harm and (ii) a sustainability committee composed of external advisors, which provides guidelines for our strategic decisions. The environmental controls implemented since 2006 also contribute to mitigate theenvironmental risks of environmental compliance of CSN’s operations. To further understand our potential social and environmental risks, we use mapping criteria in accordance with the Global Reporting Initiative (G4), or GRI, for all of our operations. Resulting data and indicators in environmental, social and economic categories allow us to track our performance, structure and monitor action plans, in an effort to improve and enhance our results. Finally,Since 2010, we have been conducting a survey of greenhouse gas emissions at our main sites following the guidelines of the GHG Protocol. Additionally, in response to a law enacted by the State of Rio de Janeiro in 2012 and in effect fromsince 2013, requiringwhich requires steel making and cement facilitiesindustries to present action plans to reduce greenhouse gas emissions when renewing or applying for operational licenses, we have conducted aare conducting such survey under the supervision of greenhouse gas emissions at our main sites in 2012, and planINEA. CSN intends to use this information in the development of a corporate carbon management program and related strategies to reduce emissions.emissions, as well as to identify current risks and opportunities for improvement.
Other strategies are being adopted by us in order to improve our environmental commitment. Since 2012, we participate in theClimate Forum organized by the Ethos Institute for Social Responsibility and in 2015 we joined theOpen Letter to Brazil on Climate Changeinitiative, with the aim that the Brazilian government assume a leadership position during the 21st United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Conference, or COP-21. In 2015, we confirmed our commitment to sustainable development by signing the Sustainable Development Charter of Industry promoted by the World Steel Association, which is comprised of 75 leading steel companies committed to the seven principles of sustainability in the industry, and we also received the Gold Standard of the GHG Protocol, which confirms that we are in compliance with the standards imposed by the GHG Protocol. We report the guidelines followed by our management with respect to climate change, supply chain and water resources to the Carbon Disclosure Project – CDP, and actively participates in the network NICOLE Brazil, a Brazilian leading organization that develops and promotes solutions for the management of contaminated areas. We also develop environmental education projects and promote understanding of the historical and natural patrimony, especially in the Arcos, Casa de Pedra and TLSA plants. To reaffirm our commitment to the transformation of values and attitudes through new habits and knowledge, we started the Environmental Education Program (PEA), an initiative managed by the CSN Foundation that uses art as a dialogue between students, teachers and employees. In relation to our expenditures for environmental programs, and given the potential risk of water shortages, especially in the Southeast of the Brazil, we have continued with various actions aimed at increasing the efficiency of water usage in our production processes, with an emphasis on accomplishing a water reuse rate of, at least, 92% in the Usina Presidente Vargas plant. In 2014, we hired a consultancy to prepare a water inventory, which provided us knowledge of how and to what extent our operations affect water resources, allowing us to develop plans and take actions to improve our efficiency and reduce potential pollution in local watersheds. Since our privatization, we have invested heavily in environmental protection and remediation programs. We had environmental expenditures (capitalized and expensed) of R$436.2405 million in 2012,2015, of which R$131.490 million relate to capital expenditures (CAPEX) and R$304.8315 million relate to operational expenditures.expenditures (OPEX). Our total environmental expenditures were R$310.6361 million in 20112014 and R$336.0382 million in 2010. 2013. Our investments in environmental projects during 20122015 were mainly related to: (i) operation, maintenance and retrofitting of environmental control equipment; (ii) development of environmental studies for permit applications; (iii) studies, monitoring, and remediation of environmental liabilities due to prior operations, especially before our privatization; and (iv) human resources (environmentalresources(environmental team), Environmental Management System, sustainability projects and compliance programs.
Table of contents Our environmental guidelines also comprehend monitoring of our tailing dams, which are used to contain the waste of the beneficiation process of iron ore and to contain sediments from the waste dumps and mining activities. On an annual basis, all our tailing dams are audited by independent audit companies. The most recent audit report confirmed and attested that all tailing dams are stable, in accordance with technical standards and relevantlegislation. In addition to that, CSN´s tailing dams are built using the “downstream” method, which is considered the safest method of tailing dams’ construction. TACs In 2010, we signed with the Rio de Janeiro State Government a Term of Undertaking (Termo de Ajustamento de Conduta), or TAC (”TAC 2010”), that required new investments and studies to retrofit our environmental control equipment at the Presidente Vargas Steelworks.UPV plant. The TAC 2010 initially estimated the total amount to be disbursed in connection with the implementation of the required projects thereunder to be R$216 million. This initial estimate was updated to R$260 million as we obtained more accurate cost estimates for the completion of the projects. AlthoughIn 2013, we have not yet concluded the process of obtaining updates for cost estimates for all projects undersigned an amendment to the TAC we expect that investments required may exceed our last estimates. Our main2010 regarding certain items pending conclusion and also included new obligations, as determined by the Rio de Janeiro State Environmental Agency (INEA), resulting in an additional investment of R$165 million, which has already been made by us. Given the deadline of the TAC 2010 in 2015, CSN, the Rio de Janeiro State and INEA came into a new agreement for complementary actions and signed a new TAC – TAC INEA No. 03/2016, in April 13, 2016 (“TAC 2016”). The TAC 2016 determines an additional investment of R$178 million for environmental claims ascontrols at the UPV plant and the payment, by CSN, to the Rio de Janeiro state authorities of December 31, 2012 were associated with recovery services at former coal mines decommissioned in 1989environmental fines in the stateamount of Santa Catarina,R$22 million, which will be allocated to environmental programs in the Volta Redonda region. As a consequence, the TAC 2016 concludes legal proceedings related to the TAC 2010. In April 2016, INEA executed one of the letters of guarantee in the amount of R$13 million and recovery services due to previous operations in our Presidente Vargas Steelworks. such amount has already been paid by CSN.
Other Environmental Proceedings and Liabilities In July 2012, the Ministério Público Estadual do Rio de Janeiro (EnvironmentalEnvironmental Public Prosecutor of the State of Rio de Janeiro)Janeiro (Ministério Público Estadual do Rio de Janeiro) filed a judicial proceeding against us claiming that we must (i) remove all waste disposed in two areas used as an industrial waste disposal site in the city of Volta Redonda and (ii) relocate 750 residences located in the adjacent neighborhood Volta Grande IV Residential, also in the city of Volta Redonda. Later in 2012, we received notices for lawsuits brought by certain home owners at Volta Grande IV Residential claiming indemnification for alleged moral and material damages. Trial Courts in Rio de Janeiro have been adopting a split position as to whether the individual claims shall or not remain suspended until production of technical evidence on the Public Civil Action. Some cases remain suspended and others advanced to nomination of the judicial experts that will conduct the evidence production phase. For more information, please see Item“Item 8A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information – Information—Legal Proceedings –Proceedings—Other Legal ProceedingsProceedings.” In 2015, the Federal Public Prosecutor of Rio de Janeiro (Ministério Público Federal do Rio de Janeiro.) filed a public civil action against CSN to request an adjustment to emissions thresholds of the UPV plant. According to Resolução Conama 436, CSN is required to reduce emissions by December 2018. Currently, CSN is complying with state regulations. In respect to other allegedly contaminated areas located in the city of Volta Redonda, State of Rio de Janeiro, the Federal and State Prosecutors have initiated lawsuits seeking remediation and indemnification in relation to the areas known as Marcia I, Marcia II, III and IV, Wandir I and II and Reciclam. These legal proceedings are in an initial phase and, currently, CSN is conducting environmental studies which will determine the extension of the impacts arising from the contamination and is also implementing measures in order to comply with the applicable laws. Once concluded, these environmental studies will be presented and attached to each respective legal proceeding. Therefore, at this moment, no amount has been determined in relation to any significant disbursement and/or investment to made by us. Our main environmental claims as of December 31, 2015 were associated with recovery services at former coal mines decommissioned in 1989 in the state of Santa Catarina, and recovery services due to previous operations in our UPV plant.
Table Of Contentsof contents We record a provision for remediation costs and environmental lawsuits when a loss is probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. This provision is included in our statements of income in “Other Operating (Expenses) Income”.We do not include in our reserves environmental liabilities related to ERSA, as these are contractually supported by its seller.former owner. As of December 31, 2012,2015, we had provisions for environmental liabilities in the total amount of R$386.1262.3 million, which we believe are sufficient to cover all probable losses. Such amount compares to R$312.6211.5 million as of December 31, 2011,2014, and R$278.1346.5 million as of December 31, 2010.2013. The increase in our provisions for environmental liabilities in 20122015 as compared 2011to 2014 is mainly due to receiptthe critical review of newthe remediation strategy and environmental notifications related to landfillsmanagement for external landfill areas, especially the areas of Mina IV (environmental recovery of former coal mine in Santa Catarina State) and coal mines decommissionedEstação Ecológica de Corumbá (management of a nature conservation area in the stateState of Santa Catarina. Minas Gerais), resulting in a new technical approach based on geotechnical confinement. The changes in the provision for environmental liabilities on our financial statements are as follows: | Amounts
| (in millions of R$) | December 31, 20102013 | 278.1 346.5
| Landfills(1)
| 6.2
| Term of Undertaking (TAC)(2)(1) | 28.3 5.7
| OtherDecommissioned Coal Mines (Santa Catarina)
| - -11.6
| Landfills and other(2) | -129.0 | December 31, 20112014 | 312.6 211.5
| LandfillsTerm of Undertaking (TAC)(1)
| 34.9 72.8
| Decommissioned Coal Mines (Santa Catarina) | 32.1 -12.9
| OtherLandfills and other(2)
| 6.5 -9.1
| December 31, 20122015 | 386.1 262.3
|
(1) Refers to an estimate calculation of recovery costs related to landfills remediation obligations. (2) Refers to environmental compensation agreed in the TAC but not related to investments in equipment.
(2) Refers to an estimate calculation of recovery costs related to landfills remediation obligations. Brazil – mining regulation Under the Brazilian Constitution, all mineral resources in Brazil belong to the federal government. The Brazilian Constitution and Mineral Code impose various regulatory restrictions on mining companies relating to, among other things: ·
- the manner in which mineral deposits must be exploited;
·
- the health and safety of workers and the safety of residential areas located near mining operations;
·
- the protection and restoration of the environment;
·
- the prevention of pollution; and
·
- the support of local communities where mines are located.
Mining companies in Brazil can only prospect and mine pursuant to prospecting authorizations or mining concessions granted by the National Department of Mineral Production (Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineral), or DNPM, an agency of the Ministry of Mines and Energy of the Brazilian Government. DNPM grants prospecting authorizations to a requesting party for an initial period of one to three years. These authorizations are renewable at DNPM’s discretion for another period of one to three years, provided that the requesting party is able to show that the renewal is necessary for proper conclusion of prospecting activities. On-site prospecting activities must start within 60 days of official publication of the issuance of a prospecting authorization. Upon completion ofprospectingof prospecting activities and geological exploration at the site, the holder of the prospecting authorization must submit a final report to DNPM. If the geological exploration reveals the existence of a mineral deposit that is economically exploitable, the grantee has one year (which DNPM may extend) from approval of the report by DNPM to apply for a mining concession by submitting an economic exploitation plan or to transfer its right to applytoapply for a mining concession to an unrelated party. When a mining concession is granted, the holder of such mining concession must begin on-site mining activities within six months. DNPM grants mining concessions for an indeterminate period of time lasting until the exhaustion of the mineral deposit. Extracted minerals that are specified in the concession belong to the holder of the concession. With the prior approval of DNPM, the holder of a mining concession can transfer it to an unrelated party that is qualified to own concessions. Under certain circumstances, mining concessions may be challenged by unrelated parties.
Table Of Contentsof contents Mining Concessions Our iron ore mining activities at Casa de Pedra mine are performed based onManifesto de Mina, which gives us full ownership over the mineral deposits existing within our property limits. Our iron ore mining activities at Engenho and Fernandinho mines are based on a concession by the Ministry of Mines and Energy, which grants us the right to exploit mineral resources from the mine for an indeterminate period of time lasting until the exhaustion of the mineral deposit. Our limestone and dolomite mining activities at the Bocaína mine and our tin mining activities at Ariquemes (ERSA mine) are based on concessions under similar conditions. See “Item 4D. Property, Plant and Equipment” for further information. On October 30, 2015 and upon prior approval of DNPM, the Manifesto de Mina for Casa de Pedra was transferred by CSN to Congonhas Minérios, which also became the titleholder of the Engenho mining concession by the end of the year of 2015.In the same occasion, Fernandinho mining concession and the mining rights of Cayman and Pedras Pretas were transferred by Nacional Minérios (“Namisa”) to Minérios Nacional. For further information, see “Item 4D. Property, Plant and Equipment”. Mineral Rights and Ownership Our mineral rights for Casa de Pedra mine include the mining concession, a beneficiation plant, roads, a loading yard and a railway branch, and are duly registered with theDNPM. We have also been granted by DNPM easements in 1519 mine areas located in the surrounding region, which are not currently part of Casa de Pedra mine, with the purpose to expand our operations, and hold title to all of our proved and probable reserves. In addition, we have obtained and are in compliance with all licenses and authorizations for our operations and projects at Casa de Pedra mine. The exploitation in Casa de Pedra mine is subject to mining lease restrictions, which were duly addressed in our iron ore reserve calculations. Quality requirements (chemical and physical) are the key “modifying factors” in the definition of ore reserves at Casa de Pedra and were properly accounted for by our mine planning department. The Brazilian government charges us a royalty known as the Financial Compensation for Exploiting Mineral Resources (Compensação Financeira pela Exploração de Recursos Minerais), or CFEM, on the revenues from the sale of minerals we extract, net of taxes, insurance costs and costs of transportation. DNPM is responsible for enacting regulations on CFEM and auditing the mining companies to ensure the proper payment of CFEM. The current annual rates are: ·
- 3% on bauxite, potash and manganese ore;
·
- 2% on iron ore, kaolin, copper, nickel, fertilizers and other minerals; and
·
- 1% on gold.
The Mineral Code and ancillary mining laws and regulations also impose other financial obligations. For example, mining companies must compensate landowners for the damages and loss of income caused by the use and occupation of the land (either for exploitation or exploration) and must also share with the landowners the results of the exploration (in a rate of 50% of the CFEM). Mining companies must also enter into agreements with the Brazilian government to use public lands and eventually compensate the governmentthegovernment for damages caused to such public lands. A substantial majority of our mines and mining concessions are on lands owned by us or on public lands for which we hold mining concessions.
Table Of Contentsof contents The Brazilian Congress is currently reviewing a bill that proposes significant changes in the Mineral Code, including a potential increase of the CFEM rates, which may have a material impact on our mining operations. Antitrust Regulation We are subject to various laws in Brazil which seek to maintain a competitive commercial environment. The competition law and practice in Brazil used to beare governed primarily by Law No. 8,884/94, theLei de Defesa da Concorrência, or Competition Defense Law, under12,529, dated November 30, 2011, which terms, the Brazilian Antitrust System was composed of three agencies, namelySecretaria de Direito Econômico(SDE) andConselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE),both entailed to Brazil’s Ministry of Justice, andSecretaria de Acompanhamento Econômico (SEAE),entailed to Brazil’s Ministry of Treasury. SDE had broad authority to promote economic competition among companies in Brazil, including the ability to suspend price increases and investigate collusive behavior between companies. A new Antitrust Law was enacted in 2011 (Law No. 12,529/11) and came into force on May 30, 2012 whichand provided for significant changes in boththe Brazilian Antitrust System’s structure, including the creation of the new CADE, and proceedings. The main change was the introduction ofConselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE). Referred law introduced a mandatory pre-merger notification system, as opposed to the post-merger review system previously in force. The new CADE is now formed by an Administrative Tribunal of Economic Defense(Tribunal Administrativo de Defesa Econômica), a General-Superintendence(Superintendência-Geral)and a Department of Economic Studies(Departamento de Estudos Econômicos).
CADE is responsible for the control of anti-competitive practices in Brazil. If CADE determines that certain companies have acted collusively to raise prices, it has the authority to impose fines on the offending companies, prohibit them from receiving loans from Brazilian government sources and bar them from bidding on public projects. In addition, CADE has the authority to dissolveprevent or impose certain conditions to mergers and acquisitions and/or to impose certain restrictions or conditions on M&A transactions (for instance, require a company to divest assets or take other anti-dumping measures) should it determine that the industry in which it operates is insufficiently competitive. competitive or that the transaction creates a market concentration which can affect competition. For further antitrust-related information, see “Item 8A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information-Legal Proceedings”.Proceedings.” Regulation of Other Activities In addition to mining, environmental and antitrust regulation, we are subject to comprehensive regulatory regimes for certain of our other activities, including railroadrailway transportation, electricity generation and ports. Our railroadrailway business is subject to regulation and supervision by the Brazilian Ministry of Transportation and the transportation regulatory agencyNational Agency for Ground Transportation (Agência Nacional de Transportes Terrestres(ANTT)), or ANTT, and operates pursuant to concession contracts granted by the federal government, which impose certain limitations and obligations. As of December 31, 2012,2015, we owned the following railroadrailway related assets: (i) a 33.27%34.94% direct and indirect participation in MRS Logística S.A., which holds a concession to operate Brazil’s Southeastern railway system until 2026, renewable for an additional 30 years, and (ii) a 76.13%56.92% participation in Transnordestina Logística S.A.,TLSA, which holds a concession to operate the Northeastern Railway System II (which encompasses the stretches between Missão Velha – Salgueiro, Salgueiro – Trindade, Trindade – Eliseu Martins, Salgueiro – Porto de Suape and Missão Velha – Porto de Pecém) of Brazil’s Northeastern railway system until the earlier of 2057, or the date when TLSA reaches a rate of annual return of 6.75% of its total investment and (iii) a 89.79% participation in FTL, which holds a concession to operate the Northeastern Railway System I (which encompasses the stretches between the cities of São Luís – Mucuripe, Arrojado – Recife, Itabaiana – Cabedelo, Paula Cavalcante – Macau and Propiá – Jorge Lins) of Brazil’s Northeastern railway system until 2027, renewable for an additional 30 years. Our port business is subject to regulation and supervision by the Brazilian Secretariat of Ports(Secretaria dos Portos, or SEP), the Ministry of Transportation, and the National Water Transportation Agency (Agência Nacional de Transportes Aquaviários, or ANTAQ). As of December 31, 2015, we owned a 99.99% participation in TECON, which has a concession to operate the container terminal at Itaguaí Port for a 25-year term until 2026, renewable for an additional 25 years. The concession to operateTECAR, a solid bulks terminal at Itaguaí Port, expires in 2047 and is explored since December 31, 2015, by our controlled company Congonhas Minérios due to the transaction entered into with the Asian Consortium. For more information regarding the transaction with the Asian Consortium, please see item “5A Operating Results.
Table of contents Our electricity generation business is subject to regulation and supervision by the Brazilian Ministry of Mines and Energy, the electricity regulatory agencyNational Agency for Electric Energy (Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica (ANEEL)), or ANEEL, and the National Electric System Operator (Operador Nacional do Sistema Elétrico (ONS), or ONS). As of December 31, 2012,2015, we owned the following energy related assets: (i) a 238235.2 MW thermoelectric co-generation power plant at our Presidente Vargas Steelworks, (ii) a 48.75% participation in Itá Energética S.A. (“Itasa”),ITASA, which owns and operates 60.5% of the Itá hydroelectric facility on the Uruguay river in Southern Brazil under a renewable 30-year concession until 2030, and (iii) a 17.9% participation in the consortium that built and has the right to operate the Igarapava hydroelectric facility in Southeast Brazil under a renewable 30-year concession until 2028. Our port business is subject to regulation and supervision by the Brazilian Ministry of Transportation and the ports and navigation agencyAgência Nacional de Transportes Aquaviários (ANTAQ). As of December 31, 2012, we owned the following port related assets: (i) a concession to operate the Terminal de Carvão (“TECAR”), the solid bulks terminal at Itaguaí Port, located in the State of Rio de Janeiro, which expires in 2022, renewable for an additional 25 years, and (ii) a 99.99% participation in Sepetiba Tecon S.A. (“TECON”), which has a concession to operate the container terminal at Itaguaí Port for a 25-year term until 2026, renewable for an additional 25 years.
For further information on our logistics and energy segments, see “Item 4B. Business Overview”.
Table Of Contents
Overview.” Proceedings Related to Protectionist Measures Over the past several years, exports of steel products from various countries and companies, including Brazil and us, have been the subject of anti-dumping, countervailing duty and other trade related investigations from importing countries. These investigations resulted in duties that limit our access to certain markets. Despite the imposed limitations, our exports have not been significantly affected, as we were able to re-direct our sales from restricted markets to other markets, and also because the volume of exports or products available for export has been decreasing as a result of the increased demand from our domestic market and thus present participation of exports in our total sales has been significantly reduced. In Brazil, we are subject to regulation and supervision by the Ministry of Development, Industry and Foreign Trade, the Secretary of Foreign Trade (Secretaria de Comércio Exterior (SECEX)), or SECEX, and the Commercial Defense Department (Departamento de Defesa Comercial (DECOM).), or DECOM. Worldwide, our exports are subject to the protectionist measures summarized below. United States
Anti-dumping (AD) and Countervailing Duties (CVD). In the U.S., we are subject to regulation and supervision by the U.S. Department of Commerce, (DOC),or DOC, the International Trade Commission, (ITC),or ITC, the International Trade Administration, (ITA)or ITA, and the Import Administration, (IA). In September 1998, U.S. authorities initiated anti-dumpingor IA. On July 28, 2015, AK Steel Corporation, ArcelorMittal USA LLC, Nucor Corporation, Steel Dynamics, Inc. and United States Steel Corporation filed antidumping and countervailing dutiesduty (“AD/CVD”) petitions with respect to certain cold-rolled flat steel products from Brazil,China, India, Japan, Korea, Russia, and the United Kingdomat the ITC and the DOC. On August 24, 2015, the DOC initiated both AD/CVD investigations onwith respect to cold-rolled steel from Brazil.On September 10, 2015, the ITC announced affirmative preliminary injury determinations with respect to cold-rolled imports from Brazil. On August 11, 2015, AK Steel Corporation, ArcelorMittal USA LLC, Nucor Corporation, SSAB Enterprises, LLC, Steel Dynamics, Inc., and United States Steel Corporation filed AD/CVD petitions with respect to certain hot-rolled steel sheetproducts from Australia, Brazil, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Netherlands, Turkey, and coil importedthe United Kingdom. On September 9, 2015, the DOC initiated both AD/CVD investigations with respect to hot-rolled steel from BrazilBrazil. On September 24, 2015, the ITC announced affirmative preliminary injury determinations with respect to hot-rolled steel imports from Brazil. In December 2015 and other countries. In February 1999,January 2016, the DOC reached preliminary determinations on the CVD investigation, these determinations imposed a rate of 7.42% for the exports of both hot-rolled and cold products. In February 2016, the DOC issued its preliminary determination on the anti-dumpinginvestigation of cold-rolled products, which was reviewed on April 2016, in which the rate imposed on exports to the US was20.84% as of March 7, 2016. In March2016, the DOC issued the preliminary determination on the anti-dumping and countervailing duties margins. We were found to have preliminary marginsinvestigation of 50.66%hot-rolled products, in which the rate imposed was 33.91%. The final determination for anti-dumping and of 6.62% for countervailing duties. In July 1999, Brazil and the United States signed a five-year suspension agreement, suspending the anti-dumping investigation and establishing a minimum price of US$ 327 per ton (delivery duty paid), subjectinvestigations is expected to quarterly review by the DOC. In February 2002, the U.S. government terminated the anti-dumping suspension agreement and reinstated the anti-dumping margin of 41.27%. In April 2004, we requested the DOC to conduct an administrative review of the anti-dumping investigation. Through this review, in April 2005, we obtained a favorable preliminary determination of “zero” margin of dumping from the DOC. A final determination wasbe issued in October 2005July 2016 for cold-rolled products and the “zero” marginAugust 2016 for hot-rolled products.
Table of dumping preliminarily found by the DOC was confirmed. With respect to the countervailing duties investigation, the Brazilian and U.S. governments signed, in July 1999, a suspension agreement which limited exports of hot-rolled sheets and coils from Brazil to 295,000 tons per year. At the request of the Brazilian government, the agreement was terminated in September 2004. Upon termination of this agreement, countervailing duties of 6.35% became effective regarding imports of hot-rolled products from Brazil. contents Simultaneously to the administrative review, we participated in an anti-dumping and countervailing duties expiry review which involved the exports of hot-rolled sheet and coils to the U.S. The expiry review was jointly developed by the ITC and the DOC through the IA, and was initiated in May 2004. A final determination was rendered in April 2005, retaining the anti-dumping and countervailing duties orders until May 12, 2010.
In April 2010, another anti-dumping and countervailing duties expiry review was initiated and jointly developed by the DOC and the ITC through the IA. A decision was issued by the ITC on June 6, 2011 and revoked both the anti-dumping and the countervailing duties orders. The ITC’s decision was appealed to the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT), which, on August 14, 2012, issued its opinion upholding the ITCs decision and maintaining the revocation of both the anti-dumping and the countervailing duties orders. In September 2012, the CIT’s decision was appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), which decision is expected in 2013. As a result, both orders remain suspended until a final decision is reached by the CAFC.
Canada Anti-dumping. In Canada, we are subject to regulation and supervision by the Canadian International Trade Tribunal, (CITT),or CITT, the Canada Border Services Agency, (CBSA)or CBSA and the Anti-dumping and Countervailing Directorate. In January 2001, the Canadian government initiated an anti-dumping investigation process involving hot-rolled sheets and coils exported from Brazil. The investigation was concluded in August 2001, with the imposition by Canada of an anti-dumping tax of 26.3% on imports of those products from Brazil, with minimum prices to be observed. In August 2002,order. Despite the CBSA initiated a revision of the values previously established and, in March 2003, the revised values were determined. These valueslimitations imposed by Canada, we are adjusted whenever there is an adjustment ofCanadian domestic prices. In February 2005, the CBSA initiated a reinvestigation of hot-rolled sheets and coils. We did not participate incurrently affected by this investigation.
Table Of Contents
In December 2005, the CITT initiated an expiry review of hot-rolled products, in which we participated. A final determination was issued in August 2006, determining the continuation of the anti-dumping order for hot-rolled products. As a result, exports of our hot–rolled products to Canada became subject to anti-dumping duties of 77%.
In October 2010, the CITT initiated another expiry review of hot-rolled products, in which CSN decidedsince we do not to participate. A final determination was issued in August 2011, determining the continuation of the anti-dumping order forexport hot rolled products. As a result, exports of our hot-rolled productscoil to Canada continued to be subject to anti-dumping duties of 77%.Canada.
Overview of Steel Industry World Steel Industry The worldwide steel industry comprises hundreds of steelmaking facilities divided into two major categories, integrated steelworks and non-integrated steelworks, depending on the method used for producing steel. Integrated plants, which accounted for approximately 68%2/3 of worldwide crude steel production in 2012,2013, typically produce steel by smelting in blast furnaces the iron oxide found in ore and refining the iron into steel, mainly through the use of basic oxygen furnaces or, more rarely, in electric arc furnaces. Non-integrated plants (sometimes referred to as mini-mills), which accounted for approximately 32%1/3 of worldwide crude steel production in 2012,2013, produce steel by melting scrap metal, occasionally complemented with other metallic materials, such as direct reduction iron or hot-briquette iron, in electric arc furnaces. Industry experts expect that a lack of a reliable and continuous supply of quality scrap metal, as well as the high cost of electricity, may restrict the growth of mini-mills.mini- mills. Steel continues to be the material of choice in the automotive, construction, machinery and other industries. Notwithstanding potential threats from substitute materials such as plastics, aluminum, glass and ceramics, especially for the automotive industry, steel continues to demonstrate its economic advantage. From 19902004 through 2012,2014, total global crude steel production averaged approximately 984 million1.4 billion tons per year. According to the WSA, in 2012,2015, production reached a new record of 1.511.62 billion tons, which represents a 1.3% increasedecreased of 2.8% as compared to 2011. All major producing countries, except for Japan, Germany, Brazil and Ukraine, increased their production levels in 2012.2014. China’s crude steel production in 20122015 reached 709804 million tons, an increasea reduction of 3.7%2.3% as compared to 2011.2014. Production volume in China has more than tripled in the last ten years, from 222 million tons in 2002. China’s share of world steel production increased from 45.8%49.3% in 20112014 to 46.9%50.2% in 2012.2015. In 2012,2015, Asian countries improvedreduced their production by 3.0%2.2%, reaching 983 million1.09 billion tons, according to WSA. World crude steel production reached 1,622.8 million tonnes (Mt) for the WSA.year 2015, down by -2.8% compared to 2014, and crude steel production decreased in all regions except Oceania in 2015. China’s crude steel production reached 803.8 Mt, down by -2.3% on 2014. China’s share of world crude steel production increased from 49.3% in 2014 to 49.5% in 2015. All major producing countries, except for India, decreased their production levels in 2015. According to the World Steel Associatiom, in 2015 the global crude steel production decreased, slightly and, considering that 2014 was a record production year, the production levels remained in line with 2013 figures.
Table of contents Brazilian Steel Industry Since the 1940s, steel has been of vital importance to the Brazilian economy. During the 1970s, strong government investments were made to provide Brazil with a steel industry able to support the country’s industrialization boom. After a decade of little to no investment in the sector in the 1980s, the government selected the steel sector as the first for privatization commencing in 1991, resulting in a more efficient group of companies operating today. A Privatized Industry During almost 50 years of state control, the Brazilian flat steel sector was coordinated on a national basis under the auspices ofSiderbrás,, the national steel monopoly. The state had far less involvement in the non-flat steel sector, which has traditionally been made up of smaller private sector companies. The larger integrated flat steel producers operated as semi autonomoussemi-autonomous companies under the control of Siderbrás and were each individually privatized between 1991 and 1993. We believe that the privatization of the steel sector in Brazil has resulted inimprovedin improved financial performance, as a result of increased efficiencies, higher levels of productivity, lower operating costs, a decline in the labor force and an increase in investment.
Table Of Contents
Domestic Demand Historically, the Brazilian steel industry has been affected by substantial fluctuations in domestic demand for steel. Although national per capita consumption varies with GDP, fluctuations in steel consumption tend to be more pronounced than changes in economic activity. Crude steel consumption per capita in Brazil has increased from 104 kilograms in 1999 to 147 kilograms in 2010. It is still considered low when compared to the levels of some developed countries, such as the United States and Germany. From 2005 to 2007,2015, Brazilian GDP grew on average 4.4%2.1%. In 2008 and 2009, overall global economic activity slowed significantly and domestic apparent steel consumption amounted to 24.0 million tons and 19.1 million tons, respectively.In 2010, with the recovery of the global economy, domestic demand rose by 38.8% to 26.6 million tons. On the other hand, in 2011, domestic steel demand decreased 1.2% to 26.2 million tons, mainly due to high levels of inventory held by distributors and increased indirect imports. In 2012, the slowdown of the Brazilian economy led to another decrease in steel consumption of 17.6% to 21.6 million tons. The Brazilian flat steel sector is shifting production to the higher value-added consumer durable sector. This sector is highly dependent on domestic consumer confidence, which, in turn, is affected by economic policies and certain expectations of the current government administration. Over the past years, automobile manufacturers made significant investments in Brazil. In 2009 and 2010, vehicle production recovered from the 2008 financial crisis in response to government incentives such as tax cuts.In 2012, the Brazilian market reached a record 3.8 million vehicles sold, reflecting a specific government measure, which reduced the industrialized products tax. On the other hand, exports decreased by 20.1%. In 2013, with the postponement of the reduction in industrialized products tax, the Brazilian market maintained the level of vehicles sales, but had an increase of 13.5% in exports, according to the Auto Manufacturers’ Association, or ANFAVEA, data. In 2014, the decrease in the family consumption and the employment level, allied with the end of government incentives resulted in a reduction of 7.1% in vehicles sales, respectivelly, according to the ANFAVEA data. In 2015, vehicles sales decreased 26.6% due to the economic recession a large number of vehicles in stock and by the return of the industrialized products tax. Market ParticipantsManifesto de Mina, which gives us full ownership over the mineral deposits existing within our property limits. Our iron ore mining activities at Engenho and Fernandinho mines are based on a concession by the Ministry of Mines and Energy, which grants us the right to exploit mineral resources from the mine for an indeterminate period of time lasting until the exhaustion of the mineral deposit. Our limestone and dolomite mining activities at the Bocaína mine and our tin mining activities at Ariquemes (ERSA mine) are based on concessions under similar conditions. See “Item 4D. Property, Plant and Equipment” for further information.
On October 30, 2015 and upon prior approval of DNPM, the Manifesto de Mina for Casa de Pedra was transferred by CSN to Congonhas Minérios, which also became the titleholder of the Engenho mining concession by the end of the year of 2015.In the same occasion, Fernandinho mining concession and the mining rights of Cayman and Pedras Pretas were transferred by Nacional Minérios (“Namisa”) to Minérios Nacional. For further information, see “Item 4D. Property, Plant and Equipment”. Mineral Rights and Ownership Our mineral rights for Casa de Pedra mine include the mining concession, a beneficiation plant, roads, a loading yard and a railway branch, and are duly registered with theDNPM. We have also been granted by DNPM easements in 19 mine areas located in the surrounding region, which are not currently part of Casa de Pedra mine, with the purpose to expand our operations, and hold title to all of our proved and probable reserves. In addition, we have obtained and are in compliance with all licenses and authorizations for our operations and projects at Casa de Pedra mine. The exploitation in Casa de Pedra mine is subject to mining lease restrictions, which were duly addressed in our iron ore reserve calculations. Quality requirements (chemical and physical) are the key “modifying factors” in the definition of ore reserves at Casa de Pedra and were properly accounted for by our mine planning department. The Brazilian government charges us a royalty known as the Financial Compensation for Exploiting Mineral Resources (Compensação Financeira pela Exploração de Recursos Minerais), or CFEM, on the revenues from the sale of minerals we extract, net of taxes, insurance costs and costs of transportation. DNPM is responsible for enacting regulations on CFEM and auditing the mining companies to ensure the proper payment of CFEM. The current annual rates are: - 3% on bauxite, potash and manganese ore;
- 2% on iron ore, kaolin, copper, nickel, fertilizers and other minerals; and
- 1% on gold.
The Mineral Code and ancillary mining laws and regulations also impose other financial obligations. For example, mining companies must compensate landowners for the damages and loss of income caused by the use and occupation of the land (either for exploitation or exploration) and must also share with the landowners the results of the exploration (in a rate of 50% of the CFEM). Mining companies must also enter into agreements with the Brazilian government to use public lands and eventually compensate thegovernment for damages caused to such public lands. A substantial majority of our mines and mining concessions are on lands owned by us or on public lands for which we hold mining concessions.
Table of contents The Brazilian Congress is currently reviewing a bill that proposes significant changes in the Mineral Code, including a potential increase of the CFEM rates, which may have a material impact on our mining operations. Antitrust Regulation We are subject to various laws in Brazil which seek to maintain a competitive commercial environment. The competition law and practice in Brazil are governed by Law No. 12,529, dated November 30, 2011, which came into force on May 30, 2012 and provided for significant changes in the Brazilian Antitrust System’s structure, including the creation of the new Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE). Referred law introduced a mandatory pre-merger notification system, as opposed to the post-merger review system previously in force. The new CADE is now formed by an Administrative Tribunal of Economic Defense(Tribunal Administrativo de Defesa Econômica), a General-Superintendence(Superintendência-Geral)and a Department of Economic Studies(Departamento de Estudos Econômicos). CADE is responsible for the control of anti-competitive practices in Brazil. If CADE determines that certain companies have acted collusively to raise prices, it has the authority to impose fines on the offending companies, prohibit them from receiving loans from Brazilian government sources and bar them from bidding on public projects. In addition, CADE has the authority to prevent or impose certain conditions to mergers and acquisitions and/or to impose certain restrictions or conditions on M&A transactions (for instance, require a company to divest assets or take other anti-dumping measures) should it determine that the industry in which it operates is insufficiently competitive or that the transaction creates a market concentration which can affect competition. For further antitrust-related information, see “Item 8A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information-Legal Proceedings.” Regulation of Other Activities In addition to mining, environmental and antitrust regulation, we are subject to comprehensive regulatory regimes for certain of our other activities, including railway transportation, electricity generation and ports. Our railway business is subject to regulation and supervision by the Brazilian Ministry of Transportation and the National Agency for Ground Transportation (Agência Nacional de Transportes Terrestres), or ANTT, and operates pursuant to concession contracts granted by the federal government, which impose certain limitations and obligations. As of December 31, 2015, we owned the following railway related assets: (i) a 34.94% direct and indirect participation in MRS Logística S.A., which holds a concession to operate Brazil’s Southeastern railway system until 2026, renewable for an additional 30 years, (ii) a 56.92% participation in TLSA, which holds a concession to operate the Northeastern Railway System II (which encompasses the stretches between Missão Velha – Salgueiro, Salgueiro – Trindade, Trindade – Eliseu Martins, Salgueiro – Porto de Suape and Missão Velha – Porto de Pecém) of Brazil’s Northeastern railway system until the earlier of 2057, or the date when TLSA reaches a rate of annual return of 6.75% of its total investment and (iii) a 89.79% participation in FTL, which holds a concession to operate the Northeastern Railway System I (which encompasses the stretches between the cities of São Luís – Mucuripe, Arrojado – Recife, Itabaiana – Cabedelo, Paula Cavalcante – Macau and Propiá – Jorge Lins) of Brazil’s Northeastern railway system until 2027, renewable for an additional 30 years. Our port business is subject to regulation and supervision by the Brazilian Secretariat of Ports(Secretaria dos Portos, or SEP), the Ministry of Transportation, and the National Water Transportation Agency (Agência Nacional de Transportes Aquaviários, or ANTAQ). As of December 31, 2015, we owned a 99.99% participation in TECON, which has a concession to operate the container terminal at Itaguaí Port for a 25-year term until 2026, renewable for an additional 25 years. The concession to operateTECAR, a solid bulks terminal at Itaguaí Port, expires in 2047 and is explored since December 31, 2015, by our controlled company Congonhas Minérios due to the transaction entered into with the Asian Consortium. For more information regarding the transaction with the Asian Consortium, please see item “5A Operating Results.
Table of contents Our electricity generation business is subject to regulation and supervision by the Brazilian Ministry of Mines and Energy, the National Agency for Electric Energy (Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica), or ANEEL, and the National Electric System Operator (Operador Nacional do Sistema Elétrico, or ONS). As of December 31, 2015, we owned the following energy related assets: (i) a 235.2 MW thermoelectric co-generation power plant at our Presidente Vargas Steelworks, (ii) a 48.75% participation in ITASA, which owns and operates 60.5% of the Itá hydroelectric facility on the Uruguay river in Southern Brazil under a renewable 30-year concession until 2030, and (iii) a 17.9% participation in the consortium that built and has the right to operate the Igarapava hydroelectric facility in Southeast Brazil under a renewable 30-year concession until 2028. For further information on our logistics and energy segments, see “Item 4B. Business Overview.” Proceedings Related to Protectionist Measures Over the past several years, exports of steel products from various countries and companies, including Brazil and us, have been the subject of anti-dumping, countervailing duty and other trade related investigations from importing countries. These investigations resulted in duties that limit our access to certain markets. In Brazil, we are subject to regulation and supervision by the Ministry of Development, Industry and Foreign Trade, the Secretary of Foreign Trade (Secretaria de Comércio Exterior), or SECEX, and the Commercial Defense Department (Departamento de Defesa Comercial), or DECOM. Worldwide, our exports are subject to the protectionist measures summarized below. United States
Anti-dumping (AD) and Countervailing Duties (CVD). In the U.S., we are subject to regulation and supervision by the U.S. Department of Commerce, or DOC, the International Trade Commission, or ITC, the International Trade Administration, or ITA, and the Import Administration, or IA. On July 28, 2015, AK Steel Corporation, ArcelorMittal USA LLC, Nucor Corporation, Steel Dynamics, Inc. and United States Steel Corporation filed antidumping and countervailing duty (“AD/CVD”) petitions with respect to certain cold-rolled flat steel products from Brazil,China, India, Japan, Korea, Russia, and the United Kingdomat the ITC and the DOC. On August 24, 2015, the DOC initiated both AD/CVD investigations with respect to cold-rolled steel from Brazil.On September 10, 2015, the ITC announced affirmative preliminary injury determinations with respect to cold-rolled imports from Brazil. On August 11, 2015, AK Steel Corporation, ArcelorMittal USA LLC, Nucor Corporation, SSAB Enterprises, LLC, Steel Dynamics, Inc., and United States Steel Corporation filed AD/CVD petitions with respect to certain hot-rolled steel products from Australia, Brazil, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Netherlands, Turkey, and the United Kingdom. On September 9, 2015, the DOC initiated both AD/CVD investigations with respect to hot-rolled steel from Brazil. On September 24, 2015, the ITC announced affirmative preliminary injury determinations with respect to hot-rolled steel imports from Brazil. In December 2015 and January 2016, the DOC reached preliminary determinations on the CVD investigation, these determinations imposed a rate of 7.42% for the exports of both hot-rolled and cold products. In February 2016, the DOC issued its preliminary determination on the anti-dumpinginvestigation of cold-rolled products, which was reviewed on April 2016, in which the rate imposed on exports to the US was20.84% as of March 7, 2016. In March2016, the DOC issued the preliminary determination on the anti-dumping investigation of hot-rolled products, in which the rate imposed was 33.91%. The final determination for anti-dumping and countervailing duty investigations is expected to be issued in July 2016 for cold-rolled products and August 2016 for hot-rolled products.
Table of contents Canada Anti-dumping. In Canada, we are subject to regulation and supervision by the Canadian International Trade Tribunal, or CITT, the Canada Border Services Agency, or CBSA and the Anti-dumping and Countervailing Directorate. In January 2001, the Canadian government initiated an anti-dumping investigation process involving hot-rolled sheets and coils exported from Brazil. The investigation was concluded in August 2001, with the imposition by Canada of an anti-dumping order. Despite the limitations imposed by Canada, we are not currently affected by this anti-dumping order since we do not export hot rolled coil to Canada. Overview of Steel Industry World Steel Industry The worldwide steel industry comprises hundreds of steelmaking facilities divided into two major categories, integrated steelworks and non-integrated steelworks, depending on the method used for producing steel. Integrated plants, which accounted for approximately 2/3 of worldwide crude steel production in 2013, typically produce steel by smelting in blast furnaces the iron oxide found in ore and refining the iron into steel, mainly through the use of basic oxygen furnaces or, more rarely, in electric arc furnaces. Non-integrated plants (sometimes referred to as mini-mills), which accounted for approximately 1/3 of worldwide crude steel production in 2013, produce steel by melting scrap metal, occasionally complemented with other metallic materials, such as direct reduction iron or hot-briquette iron, in electric arc furnaces. Industry experts expect that a lack of a reliable and continuous supply of quality scrap metal, as well as the high cost of electricity, may restrict the growth of mini- mills. Steel continues to be the material of choice in the automotive, construction, machinery and other industries. Notwithstanding potential threats from substitute materials such as plastics, aluminum, glass and ceramics, especially for the automotive industry, steel continues to demonstrate its economic advantage. From 2004 through 2014, total global crude steel production averaged approximately 1.4 billion tons per year. According to IABr (Instituto Aço Brasil), the BrazilianWSA, in 2015, production reached 1.62 billion tons, which represents a decreased of 2.8% as compared to 2014. China’s crude steel industry is composed of 28 mills managed by 10 corporate groups, with an installed annual capacity of approximately 45production in 2015 reached 804 million tons, producing a full rangereduction of flat, long, carbon, stainless and specialty steel. Capacity Utilization
There were no changes in Brazilian nominal steel production capacity in 20122.3% as compared to 2011. This capacity was estimated at 49 million tons. The local steel industry operated at approximately 70% utilization2014. Production volume in 2012, below the level recorded in 2011.
Exports/Imports
BrazilChina has been playing an important rolemore than tripled in the export market, primarily as an exporter of semi-finished products. The Brazilian steel industry has taken several steps towards expanding its capacity to produce value-added products. Brazil’s exports of slabs and billets reached 5.3last ten years, from 222 million tons in 2010, which represented 58%2002. China’s share of totalworld steel exports.production increased from 49.3% in 2014 to 50.2% in 2015. In 2011,2015, Asian countries reduced their production by 2.2%, reaching 1.09 billion tons, according to WSA.
World crude steel production reached 1,622.8 million tonnes (Mt) for the exportsyear 2015, down by -2.8% compared to 2014, and crude steel production decreased in all regions except Oceania in 2015. China’s crude steel production reached 803.8 Mt, down by -2.3% on 2014. China’s share of semi-finished products reached 7.2 million tons, representing 66% of total exports. In 2012, exports of semi-finished products were 6.6 million tons, a 7.4% decreaseworld crude steel production increased from 49.3% in relation2014 to 49.5% in 2015. All major producing countries, except for India, decreased their production levels in 2015. According to the previousWorld Steel Associatiom, in 2015 the global crude steel production decreased, slightly and, considering that 2014 was a record production year, representing 68%the production levels remained in line with 2013 figures.
Table of total exports.contents Brazilian Steel Industry In 2012,Since the 1940s, steel has been of vital importance to the Brazilian economy. During the 1970s, strong government investments were made to provide Brazil with a steel exports totaled 9.7 million tons, representing 31%industry able to support the country’s industrialization boom. After a decade of totallittle to no investment in the sector in the 1980s, the government selected the steel sector as the first for privatization commencing in 1991, resulting in a more efficient group of companies operating today.
A Privatized Industry During almost 50 years of state control, the Brazilian steelmakers’ sales (domestic plus exports)flat steel sector was coordinated on a national basis under the auspices of Siderbrás, the national steel monopoly. The state had far less involvement in the non-flat steel sector, which has traditionally been made up of smaller private sector companies. The larger integrated flat steel producers operated as semi-autonomous companies under the control of Siderbrás and accounting for US$7.0 billionwere each individually privatized between 1991 and 1993. We believe that the privatization of the steel sector in export earnings for Brazil. OverBrazil has resulted in improved financial performance, as a result of increased efficiencies, higher levels of productivity, lower operating costs, a decline in the last 20 years,labor force and an increase in investment. Domestic Demand Historically, the Brazilian steel industry has been characterizedaffected by a structural needsubstantial fluctuations in domestic demand for steel. Although national per capita consumption varies with GDP, fluctuations in steel consumption tend to export, whichbe more pronounced than changes in economic activity. Crude steel consumption per capita in Brazil has increased from 104 kilograms in 1999 to 147 kilograms in 2010. It is demonstrated by the industry’s supply demand curve. The Brazilian steel industry has experienced periods of overcapacity, cyclicality and intense competition during the past several years. Demand for finished steel products, as measured by domestic apparent consumption, has consistently fallen short of total supply (defined as total production plus imports). In 2012, supply totaled 38.4 million tons, as compared to apparent consumption of 25.4 million tons.
Table Of Contents
In 2012, steel imports were 3.8 million tons, or 15% of apparent domestic consumption, in line with the figures from 2011. In 2011, steel imports decreased 35.9% asstill considered low when compared to the 5.93levels of some developed countries, such as the United States and Germany.
From 2005 to 2015, Brazilian GDP grew on average 2.1%. In 2008 and 2009, overall global economic activity slowed significantly and domestic apparent steel consumption amounted to 24.0 million tons recordedand 19.1 million tons, respectively. In 2010, with the recovery of the global economy, domestic demand rose by 38.8% to 26.6 million tons. On the other hand, in 2011, domestic steel demand decreased 1.2% to 26.2 million tons, mainly due to high levels of inventory held by distributors and increased indirect imports. In 2012, the slowdown of the Brazilian economy led to another decrease in steel consumption of 17.6% to 21.6 million tons. The Brazilian flat steel sector is shifting production to the higher value-added consumer durable sector. This sector is highly dependent on domestic consumer confidence, which, in turn, is affected by economic policies and certain expectations of the current government administration. Over the past years, automobile manufacturers made significant investments in Brazil. In 2009 and 2010, (22%vehicle production recovered from the 2008 financial crisis in response to government incentives such as tax cuts. In 2012, the Brazilian market reached a record 3.8 million vehicles sold, reflecting a specific government measure, which reduced the industrialized products tax. On the other hand, exports decreased by 20.1%. In 2013, with the postponement of apparent domestic consumption),the reduction in industrialized products tax, the Brazilian market maintained the level of vehicles sales, but had an increase of 13.5% in exports, according to IABr. For information on the productionAuto Manufacturers’ Association, or ANFAVEA, data. In 2014, the decrease in the family consumption and the employment level, allied with the end of government incentives resulted in a reduction of 7.1% in vehicles sales, respectivelly, according to the ANFAVEA data. In 2015, vehicles sales decreased 26.6% due to the economic recession a large number of vehicles in stock and by the largest Brazilian steel companies, see “Item 4B. Business Overview—Competition—Competition inreturn of the Brazilian Steel Industry.”industrialized products tax.
4C. Organizational Structure
We conduct our business directly and through subsidiaries. For more information on our organizational structure, see Note 2(b) to our consolidated financial statements included in “Item 18. Financial Statements.”
4D. Property, Plant and Equipment
Our principal executive offices are located in the city of São Paulo, the State of São Paulo at Avenida Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 3,400, 20th floor (telephone number 55-11-3049-7100), and our main production operations are located in the city of Volta Redonda, in the State of Rio de Janeiro, located approximately 120 km from the city of Rio de Janeiro. Presidente Vargas Steelworks, our steel mill, is an integrated facility covering approximately 4.0 square km and located in the city of Volta Redonda in the State of Rio de Janeiro. Our iron ore, limestone and dolomite mines are located in the State of Minas Gerais, which borders the State of Rio de Janeiro to the north. Each of these mines lies within 500 km of, and is connected by rail and paved road to, the city of Volta Redonda.
The table below sets forth certain material information regarding our property as of December 31, 2012.
Facility
| Location
| Size
| Use
| Productive Capacity
| Title
| Encumbrances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Presidente Vargas Steelworks
| Volta Redonda, State of Rio de Janeiro
| 4.0 square km
| steel mill
| 5.6 million tons per year
| owned
| None
| CSN Porto Real (former GalvaSud)
| Porto Real, State of Rio de Janeiro
| 0.27 square km
| galvanized steel producer
| 350,000 tons per year
| owned
| mortgage(1)(2)
| CSN Paraná
| Araucária, State of Paraná
| 0.98 square km
| galvanized and pre-painted products
| 100,000 tons of pre- painted product and 220,000 tons of pickled hot-rolled coils
| owned
| None
| Metalic
| Maracanaú, State of Ceará
| 0.10 square km
| steel can manufacturer
| 900 million cans per year
| owned
| mortgage(3)
| Prada
| São Paulo, State of São Paulo and Uberlândia, State of Minas Gerais
| SP – 0.14 square km;
| steel can manufacturer
| 1 billion cans per year
| owned
| None
| | | MG – 0.02 square km;
| | | | | CSN, LLC
| Terre Haute, Indiana, USA
| 0.78 square km
| cold-rolled and galvanized products
| 800,000 tons of cold-rolled products and 315,000 tons per year of galvanized products
| owned
| None
|
Table Of Contents
Lusosider
| Seixal, Portugal
| 0.39 square km
| hot-dip galvanized, cold-rolled and tin products
| 240,000 tons of galvanized products and 50,000 tons of cold-rolled products per year
| owned
| None
| Prada
| Mogi das Cruzes, State of São Paulo
| 0.20 square km
| distributor
| 730,000 tons per year
| owned
| None
| Casa de Pedra mine
| Congonhas, State of Minas Gerais
| 49.00square km
| iron ore mine
| 60.0 mtpy(4)
| owned(5)
| None
| Engenho mine(6)
| Congonhas, State of Minas Gerais
| 2.85square km
| iron ore mine
| 5.0 mtpy
| concession
| None
| Fernandinho mine(6)
| Itabirito, State of Minas Gerais
| 1.47 square km
| iron ore mine
| 2.0 mtpy
| concession
| None
| Bocaina mine
| Arcos, State of Minas Gerais
| 4.11 square km
| limestone and dolomite mines
| 4.0 mtpy
| concession
| None
| ERSA mine
| Ariquemes, State of Rondônia
| 0.015 square km
| tin mine
| 1,800 tons
| concession
| None
| Thermoelectric co-generation power plant
| Volta Redonda, State of Rio de Janeiro
| 0.04 square km
| power plant
| 238 MW
| owned
| None
| Itá(7)
| Uruguay River - Southern Brazil
| 9.87 square km
| power plant
| 1,450 MW
| concession
| None
| Igarapava(8)
| State of Minas Gerais
| 5.19 square km
| power plant
| 210 MW
| concession
| None
| Southeastern
| Southern and Southeastern regions of Brazil
| 1.674 km of tracks
| railway
| --
| concession
| None
| Transnordestina
| Northern and northeastern regions of Brazil
| 4.534 km of tracks
| railway
| --
| concession
| None
| TECAR at Itaguaí Port
| Itaguaí, State of Rio de Janeiro
| 0.69 square km
| raw materials
| 4 mtpy
| concession
| None
| Container terminal - TECON at Itaguaí port
| Itaguaí, State of Rio de Janeiro
| 0.44 square km
| containers
| 2 mtpy
| concession
| None
| Namisa
| State of Minas Gerais
| 11.56 square km
| mine
| -
| Concession/ owned
| None
| Land
| State of Rio de Janeiro
| 31.02 square km
| undeveloped
| --
| owned
| pledge(9)/Collateral / mortgage(2)
| Land
| State of Santa Catarina
| 6.22 square km
| undeveloped
| --
| owned
| pledge(9)/Collateral
| Land
| State of Minas Gerais
| 32.68 square km
| undeveloped
| --
| owned
| None
| Land
| State of Piaui
| 618,037square km
| undeveloped
| | owned
| None
| Steel plant with rolling mill
| Europa / Germany /
Unterwellenborn
| 0.898 square km
| production of sections
| 1 Mio t/a
| Stahlwerk Thüringen GmbH
| None
|
(1) Pursuant to a loan agreement entered into by the State of Rio de Janeiro and Galvasud as of May 4, 2000.
(2) Pursuant to a loan agreement entered into by Kreditanstatt Für Wiederafbau, Galvasud and Unibanco as of August 23, 1999.
(3) Pursuant to a loan agreement entered into by Metalic andBanco do Nordeste do Brasil S.Aas of 2007.
(4) Information on equipment fleet installed annual ROM capacity. For information on installed annual production of products capacity, and information on mineral reserves at our Casa de Pedra mine, see “—Reserves at Casa de Pedra Mine” and table under “—Casa de Pedra Mine” below.
(5) Based on theManifesto de Mina, which gives us full ownership over the mineral deposits existing within our property limits. Our iron ore mining activities at Engenho and Fernandinho mines are based on a concession by the Ministry of Mines and Energy, which grants us the right to exploit mineral resources from the mine for an indeterminate period of time lasting until the exhaustion of the mineral deposit. Our limestone and dolomite mining activities at the Bocaína mine and our tin mining activities at Ariquemes (ERSA mine) are based on concessions under similar conditions. See “Item 4D. Property, Plant and Equipment” for further information.
On October 30, 2015 and upon prior approval of DNPM, the Manifesto de Mina for Casa de Pedra was transferred by CSN to Congonhas Minérios, which also became the titleholder of the Engenho mining concession by the end of the year of 2015.In the same occasion, Fernandinho mining concession and the mining rights of Cayman and Pedras Pretas were transferred by Nacional Minérios (“Namisa”) to Minérios Nacional. For further information, see “Item 4D. Property, Plant and Equipment”. Mineral Rights and Ownership Our mineral rights for Casa de Pedra mine include the mining concession, a beneficiation plant, roads, a loading yard and a railway branch, and are duly registered with theDNPM. We have also been granted by DNPM easements in 19 mine areas located in the surrounding region, which are not currently part of Casa de Pedra mine, with the purpose to expand our operations, and hold title to all of our proved and probable reserves. In addition, we have obtained and are in compliance with all licenses and authorizations for our operations and projects at Casa de Pedra mine. The exploitation in Casa de Pedra mine is subject to mining lease restrictions, which were duly addressed in our iron ore reserve calculations. Quality requirements (chemical and physical) are the key “modifying factors” in the definition of ore reserves at Casa de Pedra and were properly accounted for by our mine planning department. The Brazilian government charges us a royalty known as the Financial Compensation for Exploiting Mineral Resources (Compensação Financeira pela Exploração de Recursos Minerais), or CFEM, on the revenues from the sale of minerals we extract, net of taxes, insurance costs and costs of transportation. DNPM is responsible for enacting regulations on CFEM and auditing the mining companies to ensure the proper payment of CFEM. The current annual rates are: - 3% on bauxite, potash and manganese ore;
- 2% on iron ore, kaolin, copper, nickel, fertilizers and other minerals; and
- 1% on gold.
The Mineral Code and ancillary mining laws and regulations also impose other financial obligations. For example, mining companies must compensate landowners for the damages and loss of income caused by the use and occupation of the land (either for exploitation or exploration) and must also share with the landowners the results of the exploration (in a rate of 50% of the CFEM). Mining companies must also enter into agreements with the Brazilian government to use public lands and eventually compensate thegovernment for damages caused to such public lands. A substantial majority of our mines and mining concessions are on lands owned by us or on public lands for which we hold mining concessions.
Table of contents The Brazilian Congress is currently reviewing a bill that proposes significant changes in the Mineral Code, including a potential increase of the CFEM rates, which may have a material impact on our mining operations. Antitrust Regulation We are subject to various laws in Brazil which seek to maintain a competitive commercial environment. The competition law and practice in Brazil are governed by Law No. 12,529, dated November 30, 2011, which came into force on May 30, 2012 and provided for significant changes in the Brazilian Antitrust System’s structure, including the creation of the new Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE). Referred law introduced a mandatory pre-merger notification system, as opposed to the post-merger review system previously in force. The new CADE is now formed by an Administrative Tribunal of Economic Defense(Tribunal Administrativo de Defesa Econômica), a General-Superintendence(Superintendência-Geral)and a Department of Economic Studies(Departamento de Estudos Econômicos). CADE is responsible for the control of anti-competitive practices in Brazil. If CADE determines that certain companies have acted collusively to raise prices, it has the authority to impose fines on the offending companies, prohibit them from receiving loans from Brazilian government sources and bar them from bidding on public projects. In addition, CADE has the authority to prevent or impose certain conditions to mergers and acquisitions and/or to impose certain restrictions or conditions on M&A transactions (for instance, require a company to divest assets or take other anti-dumping measures) should it determine that the industry in which it operates is insufficiently competitive or that the transaction creates a market concentration which can affect competition. For further antitrust-related information, see “Item 8A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information-Legal Proceedings.” Regulation of Other Activities In addition to mining, environmental and antitrust regulation, we are subject to comprehensive regulatory regimes for certain of our other activities, including railway transportation, electricity generation and ports. Our railway business is subject to regulation and supervision by the Brazilian Ministry of Transportation and the National Agency for Ground Transportation (Agência Nacional de Transportes Terrestres), or ANTT, and operates pursuant to concession contracts granted by the federal government, which impose certain limitations and obligations. As of December 31, 2015, we owned the following railway related assets: (i) a 34.94% direct and indirect participation in MRS Logística S.A., which holds a concession to operate Brazil’s Southeastern railway system until 2026, renewable for an additional 30 years, (ii) a 56.92% participation in TLSA, which holds a concession to operate the Northeastern Railway System II (which encompasses the stretches between Missão Velha – Salgueiro, Salgueiro – Trindade, Trindade – Eliseu Martins, Salgueiro – Porto de Suape and Missão Velha – Porto de Pecém) of Brazil’s Northeastern railway system until the earlier of 2057, or the date when TLSA reaches a rate of annual return of 6.75% of its total investment and (iii) a 89.79% participation in FTL, which holds a concession to operate the Northeastern Railway System I (which encompasses the stretches between the cities of São Luís – Mucuripe, Arrojado – Recife, Itabaiana – Cabedelo, Paula Cavalcante – Macau and Propiá – Jorge Lins) of Brazil’s Northeastern railway system until 2027, renewable for an additional 30 years. Our port business is subject to regulation and supervision by the Brazilian Secretariat of Ports(Secretaria dos Portos, or SEP), the Ministry of Transportation, and the National Water Transportation Agency (Agência Nacional de Transportes Aquaviários, or ANTAQ). As of December 31, 2015, we owned a 99.99% participation in TECON, which has a concession to operate the container terminal at Itaguaí Port for a 25-year term until 2026, renewable for an additional 25 years. The concession to operateTECAR, a solid bulks terminal at Itaguaí Port, expires in 2047 and is explored since December 31, 2015, by our controlled company Congonhas Minérios due to the transaction entered into with the Asian Consortium. For more information regarding the transaction with the Asian Consortium, please see item “5A Operating Results.
Table of contents Our electricity generation business is subject to regulation and supervision by the Brazilian Ministry of Mines and Energy, the National Agency for Electric Energy (Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica), or ANEEL, and the National Electric System Operator (Operador Nacional do Sistema Elétrico, or ONS). As of December 31, 2015, we owned the following energy related assets: (i) a 235.2 MW thermoelectric co-generation power plant at our Presidente Vargas Steelworks, (ii) a 48.75% participation in ITASA, which owns and operates 60.5% of the Itá hydroelectric facility on the Uruguay river in Southern Brazil under a renewable 30-year concession until 2030, and (iii) a 17.9% participation in the consortium that built and has the right to operate the Igarapava hydroelectric facility in Southeast Brazil under a renewable 30-year concession until 2028. For further information on our logistics and energy segments, see “Item 4B. Business Overview.” Proceedings Related to Protectionist Measures Over the past several years, exports of steel products from various countries and companies, including Brazil and us, have been the subject of anti-dumping, countervailing duty and other trade related investigations from importing countries. These investigations resulted in duties that limit our access to certain markets. In Brazil, we are subject to regulation and supervision by the Ministry of Development, Industry and Foreign Trade, the Secretary of Foreign Trade (Secretaria de Comércio Exterior), or SECEX, and the Commercial Defense Department (Departamento de Defesa Comercial), or DECOM. Worldwide, our exports are subject to the protectionist measures summarized below. United States
Anti-dumping (AD) and Countervailing Duties (CVD). In the U.S., we are subject to regulation and supervision by the U.S. Department of Commerce, or DOC, the International Trade Commission, or ITC, the International Trade Administration, or ITA, and the Import Administration, or IA. On July 28, 2015, AK Steel Corporation, ArcelorMittal USA LLC, Nucor Corporation, Steel Dynamics, Inc. and United States Steel Corporation filed antidumping and countervailing duty (“AD/CVD”) petitions with respect to certain cold-rolled flat steel products from Brazil,China, India, Japan, Korea, Russia, and the United Kingdomat the ITC and the DOC. On August 24, 2015, the DOC initiated both AD/CVD investigations with respect to cold-rolled steel from Brazil.On September 10, 2015, the ITC announced affirmative preliminary injury determinations with respect to cold-rolled imports from Brazil. On August 11, 2015, AK Steel Corporation, ArcelorMittal USA LLC, Nucor Corporation, SSAB Enterprises, LLC, Steel Dynamics, Inc., and United States Steel Corporation filed AD/CVD petitions with respect to certain hot-rolled steel products from Australia, Brazil, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Netherlands, Turkey, and the United Kingdom. On September 9, 2015, the DOC initiated both AD/CVD investigations with respect to hot-rolled steel from Brazil. On September 24, 2015, the ITC announced affirmative preliminary injury determinations with respect to hot-rolled steel imports from Brazil. In December 2015 and January 2016, the DOC reached preliminary determinations on the CVD investigation, these determinations imposed a rate of 7.42% for the exports of both hot-rolled and cold products. In February 2016, the DOC issued its preliminary determination on the anti-dumpinginvestigation of cold-rolled products, which was reviewed on April 2016, in which the rate imposed on exports to the US was20.84% as of March 7, 2016. In March2016, the DOC issued the preliminary determination on the anti-dumping investigation of hot-rolled products, in which the rate imposed was 33.91%. The final determination for anti-dumping and countervailing duty investigations is expected to be issued in July 2016 for cold-rolled products and August 2016 for hot-rolled products.
Table of contents Canada Anti-dumping. In Canada, we are subject to regulation and supervision by the Canadian International Trade Tribunal, or CITT, the Canada Border Services Agency, or CBSA and the Anti-dumping and Countervailing Directorate. In January 2001, the Canadian government initiated an anti-dumping investigation process involving hot-rolled sheets and coils exported from Brazil. The investigation was concluded in August 2001, with the imposition by Canada of an anti-dumping order. Despite the limitations imposed by Canada, we are not currently affected by this anti-dumping order since we do not export hot rolled coil to Canada. Overview of Steel Industry World Steel Industry The worldwide steel industry comprises hundreds of steelmaking facilities divided into two major categories, integrated steelworks and non-integrated steelworks, depending on the method used for producing steel. Integrated plants, which accounted for approximately 2/3 of worldwide crude steel production in 2013, typically produce steel by smelting in blast furnaces the iron oxide found in ore and refining the iron into steel, mainly through the use of basic oxygen furnaces or, more rarely, in electric arc furnaces. Non-integrated plants (sometimes referred to as mini-mills), which accounted for approximately 1/3 of worldwide crude steel production in 2013, produce steel by melting scrap metal, occasionally complemented with other metallic materials, such as direct reduction iron or hot-briquette iron, in electric arc furnaces. Industry experts expect that a lack of a reliable and continuous supply of quality scrap metal, as well as the high cost of electricity, may restrict the growth of mini- mills. Steel continues to be the material of choice in the automotive, construction, machinery and other industries. Notwithstanding potential threats from substitute materials such as plastics, aluminum, glass and ceramics, especially for the automotive industry, steel continues to demonstrate its economic advantage. From 2004 through 2014, total global crude steel production averaged approximately 1.4 billion tons per year. According to the WSA, in 2015, production reached 1.62 billion tons, which represents a decreased of 2.8% as compared to 2014. China’s crude steel production in 2015 reached 804 million tons, a reduction of 2.3% as compared to 2014. Production volume in China has more than tripled in the last ten years, from 222 million tons in 2002. China’s share of world steel production increased from 49.3% in 2014 to 50.2% in 2015. In 2015, Asian countries reduced their production by 2.2%, reaching 1.09 billion tons, according to WSA. World crude steel production reached 1,622.8 million tonnes (Mt) for the year 2015, down by -2.8% compared to 2014, and crude steel production decreased in all regions except Oceania in 2015. China’s crude steel production reached 803.8 Mt, down by -2.3% on 2014. China’s share of world crude steel production increased from 49.3% in 2014 to 49.5% in 2015. All major producing countries, except for India, decreased their production levels in 2015. According to the World Steel Associatiom, in 2015 the global crude steel production decreased, slightly and, considering that 2014 was a record production year, the production levels remained in line with 2013 figures.
Table of contents Brazilian Steel Industry Since the 1940s, steel has been of vital importance to the Brazilian economy. During the 1970s, strong government investments were made to provide Brazil with a steel industry able to support the country’s industrialization boom. After a decade of little to no investment in the sector in the 1980s, the government selected the steel sector as the first for privatization commencing in 1991, resulting in a more efficient group of companies operating today. A Privatized Industry During almost 50 years of state control, the Brazilian flat steel sector was coordinated on a national basis under the auspices of Siderbrás, the national steel monopoly. The state had far less involvement in the non-flat steel sector, which has traditionally been made up of smaller private sector companies. The larger integrated flat steel producers operated as semi-autonomous companies under the control of Siderbrás and were each individually privatized between 1991 and 1993. We believe that the privatization of the steel sector in Brazil has resulted in improved financial performance, as a result of increased efficiencies, higher levels of productivity, lower operating costs, a decline in the labor force and an increase in investment. Domestic Demand Historically, the Brazilian steel industry has been affected by substantial fluctuations in domestic demand for steel. Although national per capita consumption varies with GDP, fluctuations in steel consumption tend to be more pronounced than changes in economic activity. Crude steel consumption per capita in Brazil has increased from 104 kilograms in 1999 to 147 kilograms in 2010. It is still considered low when compared to the levels of some developed countries, such as the United States and Germany. From 2005 to 2015, Brazilian GDP grew on average 2.1%. In 2008 and 2009, overall global economic activity slowed significantly and domestic apparent steel consumption amounted to 24.0 million tons and 19.1 million tons, respectively. In 2010, with the recovery of the global economy, domestic demand rose by 38.8% to 26.6 million tons. On the other hand, in 2011, domestic steel demand decreased 1.2% to 26.2 million tons, mainly due to high levels of inventory held by distributors and increased indirect imports. In 2012, the slowdown of the Brazilian economy led to another decrease in steel consumption of 17.6% to 21.6 million tons. The Brazilian flat steel sector is shifting production to the higher value-added consumer durable sector. This sector is highly dependent on domestic consumer confidence, which, in turn, is affected by economic policies and certain expectations of the current government administration. Over the past years, automobile manufacturers made significant investments in Brazil. In 2009 and 2010, vehicle production recovered from the 2008 financial crisis in response to government incentives such as tax cuts. In 2012, the Brazilian market reached a record 3.8 million vehicles sold, reflecting a specific government measure, which reduced the industrialized products tax. On the other hand, exports decreased by 20.1%. In 2013, with the postponement of the reduction in industrialized products tax, the Brazilian market maintained the level of vehicles sales, but had an increase of 13.5% in exports, according to the Auto Manufacturers’ Association, or ANFAVEA, data. In 2014, the decrease in the family consumption and the employment level, allied with the end of government incentives resulted in a reduction of 7.1% in vehicles sales, respectivelly, according to the ANFAVEA data. In 2015, vehicles sales decreased 26.6% due to the economic recession a large number of vehicles in stock and by the return of the industrialized products tax. Market Participants According to IABr (Instituto Aço Brasil), the Brazilian steel industry is composed of 29 mills managed by 11 corporate groups, with an installed annual capacity of approximately 48.4 million tons, producing a full range of flat, long, carbon, stainless and specialty steel. Capacity Utilization There were no significant changes in Brazilian nominal steel production capacity in 2014 compared to 2013. This capacity was estimated at 48.9 million tons. The local steel industry operated at approximately 70% utilization in 2014, similar to the level recorded in 2013.
Table of contents Exports/Imports Brazil has been playing an important role in the export market, primarily as an exporter of semi-finished products. The Brazilian steel industry has taken several steps towards expanding its capacity to produce value-added products. Brazil’s exports of slabs and billets reached 5.3 million tons in 2010, which represented 58% of total steel exports. In 2011, the exports of semi-finished products reached 7.2 million tons, representing 66% of total exports. In 2012, exports of semi-finished products were 6.6 million tons, a 7.4% decrease in relation to the previous year, representing 68% of total exports. In 2013, the exports of semi-finished products reached 5.3 million tons, representing 65% of total exports. In 2014, Brazilian steel exports totaled 9.8 million tons, an increase of 21% compared to 2013 and steel imports increased by 7%, compared to 2013, according to IABr. In 2015, Brazilian steel exports totaled 13.7 million tons and accounted for US$6.6 billion in export earnings for Brazil. Over the last 20 years, the Brazilian steel industry has been characterized by a structural need to export, which is demonstrated by the industry’s supply demand curve. The Brazilian steel industry has experienced periods of overcapacity, cyclicality and intense competition during the past several years. Demand for finished steel products, as measured by domestic apparent consumption, has consistently fallen short of total supply (defined as total production plus imports). In 2015, steel imports were 3.2 million tons, or 15% of apparent domestic consumption, in line with the figures from 2014. In 2015, steel imports decreased by 19% as compared to 2014, according to IABr. For information on the production by the largest Brazilian steel companies, see “Item 4B. Business Overview—Competition—Competition in the Brazilian Steel Industry.” 4C. Organizational Structure We conduct our business directly and through subsidiaries. For more information on our organizational structure, see Note 2(b) to our consolidated financial statements included in “Item 18. Financial Statements.” 4D. Property, Plant and Equipment Our principal executive offices are located in the city of São Paulo, the State of São Paulo at Avenida Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 3,400, 20th, 19th and 15th - part floors (telephone number 55-11-3049-7100), and our main production operations are located in the city of Volta Redonda, in the State of Rio de Janeiro, located approximately 120 km from the city of Rio de Janeiro. Presidente Vargas Steelworks, our steel mill, is an integrated facility covering approximately 4.0 square km and located in the city of Volta Redonda in the State of Rio de Janeiro. Our iron ore, limestone and dolomite mines are located in the State of Minas Gerais, which borders the State of Rio de Janeiro to the north. Each of these mines lies within 500 km of, and is connected by rail and paved road to, the city of Volta Redonda. The table below sets forth certain material information regarding our property as of December 31, 2015. For more information, see Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements included in “Item 18. Financial Statements.” Facility | Location | Size | Use | Productive Capacity | Title | Encumbrances | Presidente Vargas Steelworks (1) | Volta Redonda, State of Rio de Janeiro | 4.0 square km | steel mill | 5.6 million tons per year | owned | none | CSN Cimentos (2) | Volta Redonda, State of Rio de Janeiro | 0.08 square km | cement plant | 2.4 million tons per year | owned | none | CSN Porto Real | Porto Real, State of Rio de Janeiro | 0.27 square km | galvanized steel producer | 350,000 tons per year | owned | mortgage(3)(4) | CSN Paraná | Araucária, State of Paraná | 0.98 square km | galvanized and pre-painted products | 100,000 tons of pre- painted product and 220,000 tons of pickled hot-rolled coils | owned | none | Metalic | Maracanaú, State of Ceará | 0.10 square km | steel can manufacturer | 900 million cans per year | owned | none | Prada | São Paulo, State of São Paulo and Uberlândia, State of Minas Gerais | SP – 0.14 square km; | steel can manufacturer | 1 billion cans per year | owned | none |
| | MG – 0.02 square km; | | | | | CSN, LLC | Terre Haute, Indiana, USA | 0.78 square km | cold-rolled and galvanized products | 800,000 tons of cold-rolled products and 315,000 tons per year of galvanized products | owned | none | Lusosider | Seixal, Portugal | 0.39 square km | hot-dip galvanized, cold-rolled and tin products | 240,000 tons of galvanized products and 50,000 tons of cold-rolled products per year | owned | none | Prada | Mogi das Cruzes, State of São Paulo | 0.20 square km | distributor | 730,000 tons per year | owned | none | Casa de Pedra mine | Congonhas, State of Minas Gerais | 49.00 square km | iron ore mine | 26.0 mtpy(6) | owned(7) | none | Engenho mine(8) | Congonhas, State of Minas Gerais | 2.85square km | iron ore mine | 5.6 mtpy(9) | concession | none | Fernandinho mine(8) | Itabirito, State of Minas Gerais | 1.47 square km | iron ore mine | 0.75 mtpy(6) | concession | none | Bocaina mine | Arcos, State of Minas Gerais | 4.11 square km | limestone and dolomite mines | 4.0 mtpy | concession | none | ERSA mine | Ariquemes, State of Rondônia | 0.015 square km | tin mine | 3,600 tons | concession | none | Thermoelectric co-generation power plant | Volta Redonda, State of Rio de Janeiro | 0.04 square km | power plant | 235.2 MW | owned | none | Itá(10) | Uruguay River - Southern Brazil | 9.87 square km | power plant | 1,450 MW | concession | none | Igarapava(10) | State of Minas Gerais | 5.19 square km | power plant | 210 MW | concession | none | Southeastern (MRS) | Southern and Southeastern regions of Brazil | 1,674 km of tracks | railway | -- | concession | none | FTL | Northern and northeastern regions of Brazil | 4,238 km tracks of railway 1 | railway | -- | concession | none | TLSA | Northern and northeastern regions of Brazil | 383 km tracks of railway 2 | railway | -- | concession | none | TECAR at Itaguaí Port | Itaguaí, State of Rio de Janeiro | 0.69 square km | Iron ore shipment | 45 mtpy | concession | none | Container terminal - TECON at Itaguaí port | Itaguaí, State of Rio de Janeiro | 0.44 square km | containers | 480 K TEUpy | concession | none | Namisa | State of Minas Gerais | 11.56 square km | mine | - | Concession/ owned | none | Land | State of Rio de Janeiro | 31.02 square km | undeveloped | -- | owned | pledge(12)/Collateral / mortgage(4) | Land | State of Santa Catarina | 6.22 square km | undeveloped | -- | owned | pledge(12)/Collateral | Land | State of Minas Gerais | 32.73 square km | undeveloped | -- | owned | none | Land | State of Piaui | 856.61 square km | undeveloped | | owned | none | Steel plant with rolling mill (SWT) | Europa / Germany / | 0.898 square km | production of sections | 1 million tons per year | owned | none |
| Unterwellenborn | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(2) Our CSN Cimentos cement plant is included in the same area as our Presidente Vargas Steelworks. (3) Pursuant to a loan agreement entered into by the State of Rio de Janeiro and Galvasud as of May 4, 2000. (4) Pursuant to a loan agreement entered into by Kreditanstatt Für Wiederafbau, Galvasud and Unibanco as of August 23, 1999. (5) Pursuant to a loan agreement entered into by Metalic and Banco do Nordeste do Brasil S.A as of 2007. (6) Information on installed capacity of products. For information on mineral reserves at our Casa de Pedra mine, see “—Reserves at Casa de Pedra Mine” and table under “—Casa de Pedra Mine” below.
Table of contents (7) Based on the Manifesto de Mina. See, “Item 4. Information on the Company -— B. Business Overview-Overview — Government Regulation and Other Legal Matters -— Mining Concessions.”
(6) (8) Property owned by our 60% consolidated investee Namisa.
(7) (9) Information on equipment fleet installed annual ROM capacity. (10) Property 29.5% owned by us.
(8) (11) Property 17.9% owned by us.
(9) (12) Pledged pursuant to various legal proceedings, mainly related to tax claims.
Table Of Contents
For information on environmental issues with respect to some of the facilities described above, see “Item 4B. Business Overview—Government Regulation and Other Legal Matters—Environmental Expenditures and Claims.” In addition, for information on our plans to construct, expand and improve our facilities, see “Item 4. Information on the Company - Company—D. Property, Plant and Equipment —PlannedEquipment—Planned Investments” and Note 10 to our financial statements included elsewhere in this Form 20-F.
The map above shows the locations of the Presidente Vargas Steelworks, CSN Paraná, Prada, CSN Porto Real (formerly known as GalvaSud), Metalic, Lusosider, ERSA, and CSN LLC and SWT facilities, our iron ore, limestone and dolomite mines, the power generating facilities in which we have an ownership interest, and the main port used by us to export steel products and import coal and coke, as well as the main railway connections.
Table Of Contents
Acquisitions and Dispositions Riversdale
On November 24, 2009, we concluded an initial acquisition, through our subsidiary CSN Europe, Lda, of a 14.9% minority interest in Riversdale Mining Limited (“Riversdale”), a mining company listed on the Australian Stock Exchange (ASX).In January2010, we obtained the approval of the Australian Government to acquire further shares of Riversdale, and concluded the second tranche of the acquisition, reaching an equity participation of 16.3%. In addition, we participated on a capital increase carried out by Riversdale in July 2010, subscribing to new shares, but maintaining the same equity percentage. We also made several share purchases in February 2011 and reached a total equity participation of 19.9%. We were diluted in 2010 and 2011 due to the exercise of stock options issued in favor of the management of Riversdale and of third parties. On April 20, 2011, we adhered to a public takeover offer for the acquisition of Riversdale’s shares conducted by Rio Tinto and, as a consequence, sold 100% of our equity interest held in Riversdale’s capital stock, corresponding to 47,291,891 shares, at the price of A$16.50 per share, totaling A$780,316,201.50.
Segregation of Mining Assets
We are analyzing the possibility of segregating our iron ore business and correlated logistics activities into one of our subsidiaries. Such segregation would be expected to occur upon the transfer, by means of a capital increase, of assets, liabilities, rights and obligations comprising our mining and related logistics businesses as well as of investments in related operating companies, and would also depend on several aspects, including certain regulatory approvals.
Stahlwerk Thüringen Gmbh (SWT)
On January 31, 2012, CSN Steel, S.L.U., one of our Spanish subsidiaries, entered into a share purchase agreement with the Spanish group Alfonso Gallardo (“AG Group”) to establish the acquisition of all the shares held by the AG Group in (i) SWT, a long steel manufacturer located in Unterwellenborn, Germany, specialized in the production of steel sections; and (ii) Gallardo Sections S.L.U., a steel distributor of SWT’s products. The total amount of the transaction was €483.4 million, without the assumption of any indebtedness.
The transaction involved an operational steel plant located in Germany, which was contemplated to be sold pursuant to a prior share purchase agreement executed on May 19, 2011 with the AG Group, amongst other assets. The transaction brought to an end the discussions between the parties regarding different interpretations of the earlier agreement, including termination of the related arbitral proceeding which was pending before theCámara Oficial de Comercio e Industria de Madrid.
Usiminas On December 31, 2012,2015 we owned, directly and indirectly, 20.69% of the preferred shares and 14.13% of the common shares of Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais S.A. (“Usiminas”), resulting from various acquisitions in the market since mid-2010. For more information on the value of these assets, please see Item“Item 5A. Operating Results - Critical—Critical Accounting Estimates - Estimates—Impairment of long-lived assets, intangible assets, goodwillLong-Lived Assets, Intangible Assets, Goodwill and financial assetsFinancial Assets”. We are assessing strategic alternatives in relation to our investment in Usiminas. For more information on the antitrust matters regarding our investment in Usiminas see “Item 8. Financial Information - Information—A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information Selected Financial Data - Data—Legal Proceedings - Proceedings—Antitrust.” As of March 2016, the Usiminas’ Board of Directors approved a capital increase amounting to R$64,882, through the issuance of 50,689,310 preferred shares. Consequently on April 19, 2016 CSN exercised its right of subscription, paying R$11,603 for 9,064,856 preferred shares. The Usiminas’ Shareholders’ Meeting approved in April 2016 an increase in its share capital amounting to R$1,000,000, through the issuance of 200,000,000 new common shares, with a deadline for exercising the preferential right to acquire the said shares up to 23 May 2016. The company continues to evaluate alternatives related to the investment in Usiminas. On April 28, 2016, CSN elected, for two years' term of office, two fixed and two alternate members in the Usiminas' Board of Directors and, for one year's term, one fixed and one alternate member in the Usiminas' Fiscal Committee. The election was made possible through the flexibility and exceptional decision from CADE (Administrative Council for Economic Defense) in relation to the TCD (Performance Commitment Agreement) signed by CSN and CADE in 2014. The mentioned decisionhad permitted that CSN elected pre-approved members to the Board of Directors and Fiscal Committee of USIMINAS, and was rendered by the majority of CADE's members at its session of 27 April 2016.The election of Usimina´s Board and Fiscal Committee members by CSN, as well as all meetings of the Board of Directors of Usiminas, are currently suspended as a result of judicial decisions issued by the State Court of Minas Gerais and the Federal Court of the Federal District, respectively. CSN has appealed the decision issued by the State Court of Minas Gerais on May 13, 2016.
Table of contents Namisa / Congonhas Minérios InBy the end of 2015, we restructured our iron ore business by means of the combination into Congonhas Minérios, a CSN subsidiary, of the iron ore businesses and related logistics assets of CSN and Namisa, resulting in a fully integrated operation. As part of the restructuring, Namisa was merged into Congonhas Minérios.
Previously, in 2008, a consortium of Asian shareholders that currently includescompanies composed of Itochu Corporation, JFE Steel Corporation, Kobe Steel, Ltd, Nisshin Steel Co. Ltd., Posco and China Steel Corporation, or the Asian consortium,Consortium, made an investment in our subsidiary Namisa. The joint control of Namisa and currently holds a 40% interest in Namisa. We and the Asian consortium have entered intowas governed by a shareholders’ agreement to govern our joint control of Namisa. In case of a dead-lock among the shareholders, a resolution process requires us to initiate mediationentered into with our partners and, if no solution is reached, the matter is then submitted to be addressed directly by the senior executives of the companies in dispute. In the event the dead-lock remains, the shareholders’ agreement provides for put and call options, which entitles the Asianconsortium to elect to sell all of its ownership interest in Namisa to us and we to elect to buy all ownership interest of the Asian consortium in Namisa, in each case for the fair market value of the respective shares.
Table Of Contents
Consortium. In addition, we entered into certain other agreements, including thea share purchase agreement between us and the Asian consortium and the long-term operational agreements between Namisa and us, providewhich provided for certain obligations that, in case breached orand not cured within the relevant cure period, maycould give rise, in certain situations, to the right of the non-breaching party to exercise a call or a put option, as the case may be, with respect to the Asian consortium’sConsortium’s ownership interest in Namisa. In 2013, we and the Asian Consortium initiated negotiations to resolve certain matters that (i) were subject to qualified quorum under the shareholders’ agreement, and (ii) related to the fulfillment of certain obligations under the agreements mentioned above. In parallel, we engaged in discussions with the Asian Consortium aiming at the combination of the iron ore business and related logistics assets of CSN and Namisa. In November 30, 2015, the aforementioned discussions resolved upon the closing of an agreement between we and the Asian Consortium providing for the combination of CSN’s and Namisa’s iron ore business and related logistics assets. The transaction consisted in a joint venture whereby the Asian Consortium contributed its 40% ownership interest in Namisa to Congonhas Minérios and CSN contributed the Casa de Pedra iron ore mine, its 60% ownership interest in Namisa, an 8.63% ownership interest in MRS and the rights to manage and operate the port concession in the Itaguaí Port (TECAR). In addition, long-term “offtake” agreements were executed for the supply by Congonhas Minérios of iron ore products to the Asian Consortium members and to us, as well as a long term port services agreement was executed between Congonhas Minérios and CSN to guarantee the use of TECAR by CSN to import raw materials necessary for our other activities. Considering CSN´s and the Asian Consortium’s contributions in the transaction, adjustments arising from the negotiations between the parties, as well as debt, cash and working capital adjustments, immediately after the closing, CSN and the Asian Consortium became shareholders of Congonhas Minérios with ownership interests of, respectively, 87.52% and 12.48%. The transaction also included an earn-out mechanism which, in the event of a qualified liquidity event under certain valuation parameters occurring within an agreed period of the closing of the transaction, could dilute the Asian Consortium's ownership interest in Congonhas Minérios from 12.48% up to 8.71%. Congonhas Minérios is currently a fully integrated operation (mine, rail and port), which includes an 18.63% ownership interest in MRS (comprised of Namisa’s former 10% ownership interest in MRS and the 8.63% ownership interest contributed by CSN), access to rail transportation in the form of long term agreements and the TECAR port concession. As a result of this transaction, CSN and the Asian Consortium put an end to the discussions initiated in 2013 and Congonhas Minérios captured synergies among the businesses involved, including process optimization, efficiencies in the operation and reduction of operational costs and capital expansion, and increased shareholder value, creating a world class company. Capital Expenditures We invested a total
Table of contents In 2015 the investments made by the Company totaled approximately R$3,144 2.2 billion, highlighting: • Cement: R$438 million for completion of two new grinding mills and implementation of the new clinker plant; • Steel: R$345 million, mainly for sustaining investments in 2012, R$1,517 million of which was allocated as follows: Transnordestina Logística: R$984 million; MRS Logística: R$328 million; Namisa: R$77 million; TECON: R$43 million; other projects: R$85 million. The remaining R$1,627 million was expended on: construction of a brownfield long steel millcoke plants at UPV (usina Presidente Vargas), environmental projects at UPV, energy efficiency projects (TG20), technological modernization projects at the Volta Redonda site: R$454 million;UPV, expansion of Steel Service Plant at Mogi das Cruzes and maintenance projects in other units;
• Mining: R$ 898 million, mainly for the Itaguaí Port (TECAR):acquisition of new mining equipment, running projects in iron ore beneficiation, balance of payments (sado de contratos, verificar melhor tradução) regrading Tecar expansion and sustaining current investment projects; • Other investments: R$231 million; maintenance 117 million for running investments in other operations (such as FTL and repairs:Tecon) and corporate projects (such as IT); • Spare Parts: R$219 million; expansion of the Casa de Pedra mine: R$150 million; expansion of our clinker plant: R$73 million; technological improvements: R$24 million, and others projects: R$476 million. For further information, see “Item 5B. Liquidity and Capital Resources-Short-Term Debt and Short-Term Investments.” In 2011, we invested R$4,401 million R$2,382 million of which was allocated as follows: Transnordestina Logística: R$1,691 million; CSN Cimentos: R$61 million; MRS Logística: R$447 million; Namisa: R$100 million and other projects: R$83 360 million.
The remaining R$2,019 million was expended on: maintenance and repairs: R$549 million; expansion of the Casa de Pedra mine: R$251 million; expansion of the Port of Itaguaí: R$238 million; technological improvements: R$77 million; construction of a brownfield long steel mill at the Volta Redonda site: R$220 million and others projects: R$684 million.
In 2010, we invested R$3,636 million, R$2,201 million of which was allocated as follows: Transnordestina Logística: R$1,371 million; CSN Aços Longos (merged into CSN in January 2011): R$275 million; CSN Cimentos: R$249 million; MRS Logística: R$199 million and other projects: R$107 million.
The remaining R$1,435 million was expended on: maintenance and repairs: R$483 million; expansion of the Casa de Pedra mine: R$275 million; expansion of the Port of Itaguaí: R$139 million; technological improvements: R$125 million and other projects: R$413 million.
In 2012, we continued to implement our strategy of developing downstream opportunities and projects based on synergies, new product lines and market niches by creating or expanding current capacity of galvanized products and services for the automotive sector, as described in “Item 4B. Business Overview—Facilities.”
We also intend to increase control of our main production costs and secure reliable and high quality sources of raw materials, energy and transportation supporting our steelmaking operations and other businesses such as cement, via strategic investment programs. Our main strategic investments being implemented or already in operation are set forth in “Item 4B. Business Overview—Facilities.”
Planned Investments Our operating activities require regular
In 2016 the Company's investment budgetprioritize the implementation of running capital projects and sustaining investments in equipment maintenance,order to maintain the operational capability, environment and safety issue. New investments will be evaluated considering the market conditions, financial results and projection of additional cash flow generated by each project. Considering these guidelines, investments designed for 2016 are in the order of R$1.5 billion, highlighted below: • Cement: R$567 million, specially for completion of the new clinker unit in Arcos; • Steel: R$547million, mainly for sustaining investments in coke plants UPV, environmental projects, technological improvements, tools and spare parts, vehicles, buildings, and industrial plants, among others. These investments are classified as Sustaining (´Stay-in-Business´) Capex. The Company also invests to increase its operational efficiency and productivity, and expand production capacity in its traditional flat steel, mining and logistics businesses, as well as new businesses such as cement and long steel.
Table Of Contents
Our total planned investments formodernization projects at the next years amount to R$20.0 billion (ongoing and new projects),UPV, completion of which:
·R$12.0 billion in our mining segment, including capacitythe expansion of the Casa de Pedra mineSteel Service Center of Mogi das Cruzes service and of Namisa’s mines to reach annual sales of 89 mtpy and the expansion of shipping capacity of our Solid Bulk terminal at Itaguaí (TECAR) to 84 mtpy. The planned investment reflects only the portion of our investment, which is proportional to our ownership of 100% of Casa de Pedra and 60% of Namisa;project maintenance in other units;
·• Mining (projects at Congonhas Mineração and Tecar): R$141million, mainly for final payments of equipment that were acquired in 2015, running projects in iron ore beneficiation, expansions studies for Phase 60 Mtpa in Tecar (engineering and environmental studies) and sustaining investment projects in the units;
• Other investments: R$78 R$0.5 billionmillion for sustaining investments in our steel segment, including the completion of our new brownfield long steel plant in Volta Redondaother operations (such as FTL and completion/implementation of other flat steelTecon) and corporate projects such(such as a service center for the auto industry at CSN Porto Real, along with the implementation of projects focused on maintaining operational excellence with constant focus on cost reduction (e.g., energy efficiency)IT); ·R$1.3 billion in our cement segment, allocated towards expansions of our grinding capacity from 2.4 million tons to 5.4 million tons and our clinker production capacity from 0.8 million tons to 2.8 million tons;
·• SpareParts: R$1.7 billion in our logistics segment, including the Transnordestina railway and our container terminal (TECON); investments in the MRS railway are not included in this plan nor Transnordestina Capex reviews.180 million.
·R$4.3 billion in projects to improve performance of current productive assets (“stay-in-business”).
We expect to finance these investments through our own cash, public or private financing, and/or strategic partnerships.
Our planned investments in iron ore, steel, logistics and cement are described below. Steel We are currently constructing a brownfield long steel plant in Volta Redonda,
The investment plan in the Statecoming years prioritizes sustaing investment with efficiency gains, as the revamp of Rio de Janeiro, with total capacitycoke ovens, steel mill, pickling, casting, and execution of 500 Kt per year, making useenvironmental projects, technological modernization projects at the UPV, completion of the existent infrastructure and energy, to produce rebar and wire rods. This investment represents the entrance of CSN into the long steel market in Brazil. We also invested in the expansion of service centers for the automotive market at our CSN Porto Real facility, in which CSN’s market share has been successively expanded. The pre-painted plant at CSN Paraná currently operates at full capacity,Steel Service Center of Mogi das Cruzes and there are expansion projects underway, with the intention of doubling the current capacity via brownfield expansions.
Our investment portfolio also includes other important operationalmaintenance projects in development, such as the start-up of our blast furnace turbine project, which will add 21MW of electricity self-generation and several projects designed to increase productivity and efficiency.other units.
In January 2012, CSN acquired SWT, which produces sections and Gallardo Sections S.L.U, both located in Germany. SWT has a capacity to produce 1.1 million tons of steel sections per year used in buildings, stadiums, bridges, viaducts, walkways, foundations, warehouses, cranes, among others. The plant is strategically located, reducing logistics costs of raw materials, such as scrap, and allowing access to both developed and emerging markets in Eastern Europe. The total transaction amount was €483.4 million.
Mining We expect to achieve an annual sales level
Considering the market conditions, financial results and projection of approximately 89 mtpyadditional cash flow generated by each project, in the first phase we analyze the expansion of iron ore products, including third party purchases, by increasingproduction capacity in Casa de Pedra to 40 million tons per year and Namisa. We are also investing in the expansion of TECARport capacity in Itaguai / RJ (Tecar) from 45 million tonnes to allow for annual exports60 million tons.
Table of 84 mtpy of iron ore. contents
Table Of Contents
Logistics
In August 2006, in order to enable the implementation of a major infrastructure project led by the Brazilian federal government, our Board of Directors approved the merging of Transnordestina S.A., a company that was state-owned at the time, into and with Companhia Ferroviária do Nordeste – CFN, an affiliate of CSN that holds a 30-year concession, granted in 1997, to operate the Northeastern Railroad of the RFFSA, with 4,534 km of railway track. The surviving entity was later renamed Transnordestina Logística S.A., or Nova Transnordestina. The Nova Transnordestina Project includes an additional 1,728 km of large gauge, state-of-the-art railway track. We expect this extension will allow the company to increase the transportation of various products, including, oil, fuels, soybeans, cotton, sugar cane, fertilizers, iron ore and limestone. The investments for the railroad expansion will be financed through several agencies, such as FINOR – Northeastern Investment Fund, SUDENE - the Northeastern Development Federal Agency and BNDES. Environmental, geological and land expropriation issues may result in cost overruns and delays in implementing the project, which, in turn, may adversely affect the projected return on investment.
Until 2008, Transnordestina was jointly controlled by CSN and Taquari Participações S.A., or Taquari, pursuant to a shareholders’ agreement dated November 27, 1997, and amended on May 6, 1999 and November 7, 2003. During 2009, we increased the capital of Transnordestina by disbursing advances for future capital increases. Taquari decided not to participate in such capital increases, thus being diluted and relinquishing control of Transnordestina. Transnordestina is currently controlled by CSN, and has been consolidated in our financial statements since December 2009.
To meet its own demand, Transnordestina Logística S.A built the largest factory of broad gauge concrete sleepers in the world, with a daily capacity of 4,800 pieces per day. This project has been conducted by Odebrecht, through an Alliance Model formed with CSN.
Cement The cement plant in Volta Redonda is close to reaching its fullhas a production capacity of 2.4 million tons per year. The useyear, taking advantage of the slag generated by our steel operationblast furnaces and the ramp-up of our clinker plant should gradually reduce costs, a critical elementproduced in the cement business. mine of Arcos.We are evaluating other organic growth initiatives to expand our annual capacity to 5.4implementing an integrated plant with two new cement grinding mills and a new clinker unit in Arcos, adding 2 million tons in orderof cement per year during 2015. At a later stage the company evaluates the implementation of an advanced grinding unit, adding another 1 million tons. Additional Investments In addition to capture the strong growth expected in construction of new housing unitscurrently planned investments and capital expenditures, we continue to evaluate possible acquisitions or divestitures, joint controlled entitiesand brownfield or greenfield projects to increase or complement our steel, cement and mining production and logistics capabilities, logistics infrastructure, projects.energy generation and return on capital. Item 4A.4E. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.On April 15, 2016, CSN received a letter from the Staff of the SEC's Division of Corporation Finance as part of its review of the Company's Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 and the Company's Form 6-K for the last quarter of 2015.
The Staff requested additional information and provided comments related to certain accounting disclosures, including our accounting policies regarding our concessions and disclosure relating to the acquisition of control of Nacional Minérios S.A. on November 30, 2015. The Company responded to that letter on May 06, 2016 and believes that it has addressed the Staff's comments. As of the date of this annual report, the Company has not received confirmation from the Staff that its review process is complete. The Company intends to continue working with the Staff and respond to any remaining comments. Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 20122015 and 20112014 and for each of the years ended December 31, 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 20102013 included in “Item 18. Financial Statements”. Our consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and are presented in thousands ofreais (R$), as explained in Note 2(a) to our consolidated financial statements included in “Item 18. Financial Statements.” We have applied, beginning January 1, 2013, IFRS 10 - Consolidated Financial Statements, which establishes principles for the presentation and preparation of consolidated financial statements when an entity controls one or more entities, and IFRS 11 - Joint Arrangements, which requires a new valuation of joint arrangements, focusing on the rights and obligations of the arrangement, instead of its legal form. In accordance with the new standards, the proportionate consolidation method for jointly controlled entities is no longer permitted. As a result of the adoption of these new standards, the Company no longer consolidates its jointly controlled entities MRS Logística S.A. and CBSI - Companhia Brasileira de Serviços de Infraestrutura, and Nacional Minérios S.A. until November 30, 2015 and began accounting for these investments under the equity method. As from December 1st, 2015, Nacional Minérios S.A. was consolidated as a result of the mining activities restructuring and then merged on December 31, 2015 into Congonhas Minérios S.A. The amendments provide additional transition relief, limiting the requirement to provide adjusted comparative information to only the preceding comparative period. We applied this transition relief as described above with respect to the adoption of IFRS 10 and IFRS 11. As a result, the financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012 and the opening balance sheet as of January 1, 2012 have been restated for the effects of the retrospective adoption of these new standards. Our financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011 remain unchanged and as disclosed previously and, as a result, are not comparable with the information as of and for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. In addition, due to the partial spin-off of TLSA on December 27, 2013 and the consequent entry into effect of the new shareholders’ agreement, we ceased to consolidate TLSA and began recognizing it in accordance with the equity accounting method. 5A. Operating Results Overview Brazilian Macro-Economic Scenario Brazil
According to the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE), GDP increased by 0.9% in 2012, compared to an increase of 2.7% reported in 2011. This slight growth in 2012 was led by the service and construction sectors, which moved up by 1.7% and 1.4%, respectively. Once again, domestic demand was the most important growth driver, fueled by the moderate credit expansion, job creation and increased individual earnings.However, several uncertainties are still hampering investments, resulting in a reduction in Gross Fixed Capital Formation.
Table Of Contentsof contents As a company with the vast majority of its operations and a large portion of its sales in Brazil, we are affected by the general economic conditions of Brazil. The rate of growth in Brazil is important in determining our growth capacity and the results of our operations. The IPCA consumer price index (the main inflation rate) stood at 5.84%following table shows some Brazilian economic indicators for the year, as compared to 6.50% for 2011. Personal expenditures were chiefly responsible for the upturn in 2012, while transport recorded the lowest increase.periods indicated: The Selic base interest rate, which is set by the Monetary Policy Committee (COPOM), began 2012 at 11.00% and fell successively, until reaching 7.25% in October. Since then, COPOM has opted to maintain the basic interest rate stable.
According to the IBGE, industrial output fell by 2.7% in 2012, the first negative result since 2009, with 17 of the 27 sectors recording a decrease.
In 2012, thereal depreciated 8.9% against the US dollar and on December 31, 2012, the exchange rate was R$2.04 per US$1.00.
| Year ended December 31, | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | | | | | | GDP growth | -3.8% | | 0.1% | | 2.3% | Inflation (IPCA)¹ | 10.7% | | 6.4% | | 5.9% | Inflation (IGP-M)² | 10.5% | | 3.7% | | 5.5% | CDI³ | 13.2% | | 10.8% | | 8.1% | Appreciation (depreciation) of thereal against the U.S. dollar | -45.0% | | -13.4% | | -14.6% | Exchange rate at the end of period (U.S.$1.00) | R$3.904 | | R$2.656 | | R$2.343 | Average exchange rate (U.S.$1.00) | R$3.338 | | R$2.357 | | R$2.160 | Unemployment rate4 | 8.5% | | 6.8% | | 7.1% | Sources: IBGE, Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Central Bank and CETIP. | (1) The IPCA is a consumer price index measured by the IBGE. | (2) The IGP-M is the general market price index measured by the Fundação Getúlio Vargas. | (3) The Interbank Deposit Rate, or CDI, represents the average interbank deposit rate performed durig a given day in Brazil (accrued as of the last month of the period, annualized). | (4) The unemployment rate (PNAD) is measured by IBGE. |
USA
According to the U.S. Department of Commerce, the U.S. economy grew by 2.2% in 2012, as compared to 1.8% in 2011. The main contributors to GDP growth in 2012 were personal consumption expenditures, nonresidential fixed investment, exports, residential fixed investment and private inventory investment.
According to the latest Fed figures, industrial production edged up by 0.3% in December and 1.0% in the fourth quarter of 2012, reflecting the reconstruction after hurricane Sandy. The manufacturing PMI recorded 50.7 points in December, versus 49.5 in November.
On the monetary policy front, the Fed opted to peg interest rates to the current economic scenario, keeping them low while unemployment is above 6.5% and estimated inflation for the next two years does not exceed 2.5%.
Europe
The Eurozone manufacturing sector ended 2012 in recession, reflecting flagging international and domestic demand. Manufacturing PMI stood at 46.1 points in December, the 17th consecutive monthly decline.
Unemployment remained flat in December over November at 11.7%, equivalent to 18.2 million people out of work. Greece and Spain had the highest rates, with 26.8% and 26.1% respectively, while Germany recorded 5.3%.
According to Eurostat, Eurozone GDP dipped by 0.5% in 2012 over 2011 and by 0.6% in the fourth quarter of 2012 over the previous quarter, marking the bloc’s worst performance since the beginning of 2009. The overall downturn in the fourth quarter of 2012 was fueled by individual decreases in the four largest economies: Germany (0.6%), France (0.3%), Italy (0.9%) and Spain (0.7%).
Asia
Chinese GDP grew by 7.8% in 2012 and 9.2% in 2011, according to the country’s National Bureau of Statistics. The Chinese economy is currently recording steady growth, thanks to increased investments in infrastructure, the cut in interest rates and the reduction in reserve requirements since the end of 2011.
Chinese manufacturing PMI stood at 51.5 points in December, the highest figure since May 2011, while industrial output and retail sales climbed by 10% and 14.3%, respectively, in 2012. Annual inflation fell to 2.6%, less than half the 5.4% recorded in 2011.
Japanese GDP increased by 1.9% in 2012 over 2011. Impacted by the Japanese Central Bank’s aggressive monetary policy, the yen has depreciated by around 20% against the dollar since November 2012.
Table Of Contents
Segments
Steel For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015 our steel segment represented 63%, 65% and 68% of our net revenues, respectively, and 44%, 61% and 59% of our gross profit, respectively. In 2015, 60% of our steel revenues were in Brazil, and 40% were abroad, as compared to 75% and 25%, respectively, in 2014, and 78% and 22%, respectively, in 2013. According to the WSAWorld Steel Association (WSA), global crude steel production totaled 1.51.6 billion tons in 2012, 1% higher than2015, 2.9% less when compared with 2014, with China responsible for 804 million tons, or 50% of the global output, recording a decrease of 2.3%. Japan's crude steel production decreased 5.4%, totaling 105 million tons in 2011, this growth coming mainly from Asia and North America.2015. In the European Union, production reached 166 million tons in 2015, corresponding to a 1.7% fall compared to 2014. In theU.S., crude steel production totaled 78 million tons in 2015, an 11.4% decrease as compared to 2014. Existing global capacity use fell from 76.1% in Novemberusage decreased by 7.4% over the year before to 73.2% in December, showing a continuing imbalance between production capacity and global steel product consumption. Brazil69.7%.
According to the Brazilian Steel Institute (IABr), annual domestic crude steel production totaled 34.7was 33.3 million tons 1.5%in 2015, 1.9% less than in 2011, and 15.1 million tons of2014, while rolled flat steel up by 8%. Domestic flat steel sales remained stable over 2011 at 11.3 million tons, while exports fell by 10% to 1.9 million tons.
Apparent flat steel consumption came to 13.4 million tons, 1% down on 2011, while importsoutput totaled 2.022.6 million tons, down by 11%.8.3% in the same period.
Automotive
AccordingApparent domestic steel product consumption in Brazil amounted to ANFAVEA (the Brazilian Auto Manufacturers’ Association), vehicle production totaled 3.321.3 million unitstons in 2012, 2%2015, 13% less than in 2011. Vehicle2014, while domestic sales totaled 3.8decreased 12% to 18.2 million intons. Annual imports to Brazil were 3.2 million tons, 19% less than the year an increase of 5% in relationbefore, while exports increased 35% to 2011, spurred by government measures to encourage consumption, such as the reduction in IPI (federal VAT). Exports, on the other hand, fell by 20%, to 442,000 units.
Construction
Sinduscon (Brazilian Builders’ Association) estimates that the construction segment will end 2012 with growth of 4%, while FGV (Fundação Getúlio Vargas) expects the building materials industry and retail sales to expand by 1.9% and 8.2%, respectively.
According to ABRAMAT (the Brazilian Building Material Manufacturers’ Association), domestic sales of building materials increased by 1.4% in 2012.
Distribution
According to INDA (the Brazilian Steel Distributors’ Association), domestic flat steel sales by distributors totaled 4.413.2 million tons in 2012, a 1.5% increase over 2011. Purchases by the associated network came to 4.3 million tons in 2012, 5.2% higher than in 2011. Inventories closed the year at 944,000 tons, a 5.7% increase over the December 2011 figure, representing 3.0 months of sales.tons.
Home Appliances
According to Eletros (Brazilian Home Appliance and Consumer Electronics Manufacturers’ Association), the home appliance segment closed 2012 with 15% growth in the sales of washing machines, refrigerators and stoves.
With the extension of IPI tax exemptions on home appliances until the end of January 2013, followed by a gradual increase from February through June 2013, Eletros has reviewed its estimates and now expects sales growth of 10% in 2013.
International
According to the WSA,crude steel output in China totaled 708.8 million tons in 2012, a 3.6% increase as compared to 2011 and a new record, accounting for 46.3% of the global total, while Japan's crude steel production remained virtually stable, totaling 107.2 million tons in 2012. In the European Union, production reached 169.4million tons in 2012, corresponding to a 4.5% decrease as compared to 2011, with Germany accounting for 43 million tons, a 3.7% decrease in its production as compared to 2011. In theU.S., crude steel production totaled 88.6 million tons in 2012, a 2.7% increase as compared to 2011.
Table Of Contents
Mining For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015 our mining segment represented, 27%, 23% and 19% of our net revenues, respectively, and 44%, 24% and 24% of our gross profit, respectively. In 2015, 95% of our mining revenues came from exports and 5% from the domestic market, as compared to 93% and 7%, respectively, in 2014, and 87% and 13%, respectively, in 2013.
Table of contents In 2012,2015, the seaborne iron ore market was markedremained under pressure due to the increased supply capacity in Australia and Brazil. The adoption of cost reduction programs allowed junior producers to remain in the market. On the demand side, the infrastructure and construction, major steel consumers in China, showed a significant slowdown. Therefore, the steel volume produced by its price volatility, reflecting global economic uncertainties. After peaking at US$151.25/dmtthis country dropped 2% in April 2012,2015, the Platts IO Fines 62% CFR China price index fell to US$88.50/dmtfirst reduction in September 2012, closing the year at US$144.50/dmt, reflecting the improved performance of the Chinese economy, decline inmore than three decades. In this scenario, iron ore inventoriesprices fell by 28% in Chinese ports, weaker Indian exports and approach of2013, 43% over 2014, averaging US$55.50/dmt (Platts, 62% Fe, N. China). On April 29, 2016, the rainy season in Brazil and Australia.index stood at US$65.85/dmt. Fueled by this scenario,Nevertheless, according to CRU, the seaborne iron ore seaborne market grew by 7% in 2012,recorded growth of 2%, reaching 1,0741.42 billion tons. China imported 914 million tons, sustained by China, which accounted for 66%a 1% increase when compared to 2014 and equivalent to almost 65% of total sales volume. Annual Chinese iron ore seaborne imports increased by 10% over 2011. In lightBrazil shipped 364 million tons in 2015, 6% more than the year before.
China registered its most modest GDP growth in 25 years, reaching 6.9% during 2015. Industrial production, a strong indicator of urbanization projects and infrastructure investments announced by the Chinese government in September, the country’s iron ore consumption should continuegrowth, grew by 6.1%, as compared to expand. In 2012, Brazil maintained its strong position8.3% in 2014, reinforcing prospects of a slowdown in the seaborne iron ore market, with sales of 322 million tons, despite the 1% reduction in exports due to heavy rainfall at the beginning of the year.short term.
Logistics, Port Logistics, Cement and Energy RailwayThe performance of our logistics,
According to ABIFER (Brazilian Railway Industry Association), Brazilian rail sector revenue is expected to reach R$4.3 billion in 2012, virtually identical cement and energy segments are directly related to the 2011 figure.performance of our steel and mining segments. For the years ended on December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015, these segments represented an aggregate of 10%, 12% and 12% of our net revenues, respectively, and an aggregated of 12%, 15% and 17% of our gross profit, respectively. A material portion of the revenues in these segments is derived from our steel and mining operations, which utilize our logistics network and energy output.
AimingSpecific Events Affecting our Results of Operations
TLSA On September 20, 2013 we entered into an investment agreement with our partners in TLSA, Valec Engenharia, Construções e Ferrovias S.A. and Fundo de Desenvolvimento do Nordeste – FDNE, two Brazilian federal government entities focused on infrastructure and the development of the northeastern region, to reduce infrastructure bottlenecks,implement the Brazilian government announced the constructionpartial spin-off of 15,000 kmTLSA. The operation was part of rail tracka business reorganization and resulted in the coming years, 5,000 kmsegregation of which fall under the Growth Acceleration Program (PAC)assets of the Northeastern railway system into two systems: (i) Railway System I, operated by FTL, comprising the stretches between the cities of São Luís – Mucuripe, Arrojado – Recife, Itabaiana – Cabedelo, Paula Cavalcante – Macau and 10,000 kmPropiá – Jorge Lins and (ii) the Railway System II, operated by TLSA, comprising the stretches between Missão Velha – Salgueiro, Salgueiro – Trindade, Trindade – Eliseu Martins, Salgueiro – Porto de Suape and Missão Velha – Porto de Pecém. As a result of the partial spin-off and the subsequent entry into effect of the new shareholders’ agreement, control of TLSA is now shared with other shareholders, who have veto rights over certain important corporate decisions. As a result, since December 27, 2013, we ceased to be awardedconsolidate TLSA and began recognizing it in concessions. accordance with the equity accounting method. See “Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report. Port logisticsCongonhas Minérios
On November 30, 2015, we concluded the establishment of a strategic alliance with an asian consortium composed of ITOCHU Corporation, JFE Steel Corporation, POSCO, Ltd., Kobe Steel, Ltd., Nisshin Steel Co, Ltd. and China Steel Corp. (“Asian Consortium”). AccordingThe transaction consisted of a business combination of the iron ore and related logistic assets of CSN and Namisa. The Asian Consortium contributed its equity interest of Namisa (40%) into Congonhas Minérios S.A. (“Congonhas Minérios”), a mining subsidiary of CSN,and CSN contributed the Casa de Pedra iron ore mine, its 60% ownership interest in Namisa, an 8.63% ownership interest in MRS and the rights to ANTAQ (Brazilian National Waterway Transport Agency), Brazil’smanage and operate the port installations handled approximately 904 million tons of cargo in 2012, a 2.0% increase over 2011, with bulk solids totaling 554 million tons, an increase of 2.0%. Container handling amounted to 8.2 million TEUs(Twenty‐Foot Equivalent Unit – transportation unit equivalent to a standard 20-feet intermodal container), 3.8% more thanconcession in the last year.Itaguaí Port (TECAR).
The Brazilian government announced investments of R$54 billion in the port sector through 2017, including dredging works and projects to renovate port infrastructure and expand cargo handling capacity, in addition to R$2.6 billion allocated to railway access routes.
Cement
Preliminary figures from SNIC (the Brazilian Cement Industry Association) indicate domestic cement sales of 68.3 million tons in 2012, a 6.9% increase over the year before. According to SECEX (the Brazilian Foreign Trade Secretariat), cement imports totaled 977 thousand tons in 2012, 10.4% less than in 2011.
Energy
According to the Brazilian Energy Research Company (EPE), in 2012 Brazilian electricity consumption increased by 3.5% over 2011, led by the commercial and residential segments, which recorded respective growth of 7.9% and 5.0%. Industrial consumption remained flat.
Table Of Contentsof contents Considering the position of Congonhas Minérios’ assets, the contributions made by the Asian Consortium in the transaction, as well as adjustments resulting from the negotiations between the parties and adjustments of debt, cash, working capital, CSN and the Asian Consortium held, respectively, equity stakes at 87.52% and 12.48% in the capital stock of Congonhas Minérios upon conclusion of the transaction. Part of the iron ore produced byCongonhas Minérios will be sold to members of the Asian Consortium and to CSN. Such rights are reflected in long-term supply agreements entered into on November 30, 2015, which terms were negotiated on usual market conditions. CSN also ensured the use of TECAR for import of raw materials through a long-term agreement. The transaction was concluded by the signing of a shareholders agreement by the shareholders of Congonhas Minérios, on November 30, 2015. The following steps were carried out in order to conclude the transaction: ·Payment of dividends by Namisa before closing of the transaction, amounting US$1.4 billion (equivalent to R$5.4 billion); ·Restructuring of Congonhas Minérios through the contribution, by CSN, of assets and liabilities related to Casa de Pedra, the rights to operate TECAR, 60% of Namisa’s shares, 8.63% of MRS’ shares, and US$850 million in debt (equivalent to R$3,370 million, as presented in note 9.b of our Consolidated Financial Statements); ·Acquisition, by Congonhas Minérios, of 40% of the Namisa shares held by the Asian Consortium, resulting in the incorporation of Namisa by Congonhas Minérios; ·Signing of a shareholders agreement (“Shareholders’ Agreement”) by the shareholders of Congonhas Minérios; ·Payment by CSN of US$680 million relating to the acquisition of 4% of the shares held by the Asian Consortium in Congonhas Minérios and an additional US$ 27 million relating to the acquisition of 0.16% of the shares held by the Asian Consortium in Congonhas, amounting to US$ 707 million (equivalent to R$2.7 billion); · Settlement of the pre-existing agreements with Namisa for supply of high-silicon and low-silicon content ROM (Run of Mine), port services and ore beneficiation. We applied IFRS 3 to record the November 2015 transaction, as there was a change of control of Namisa on November 30, 2015. We applied the acquisition method along with the step acquisition method. The acquirer for purposes of IFRS 3 was our subsidiary Congonhas Minérios which was also the surviving entity. As a result of the step acquisition, we recognized a gain of R$2,792 million in the value of our 60% interest in Namisa. In addition, as a result of the application of items B51 and B52 of IFRS 3, we recognized a gain of R$621 million as a result of the termination of the then existing agreements between Namisa and Congonhas. We also recorded R$528 million in taxes on the gains from the transaction. Additionally, there was a change in our interest in Congonhas without representing a loss of control in Congonhas. Our participation decreased from 100% to 87.52%. According to IFRS 10, this change should be classified as an equity transaction and the resulting gain or loss on the new value of the participation must be recorded directly in equity. Because of this percentage change, we recorded a gain of R$1,945 million. The sum of the net gains recorded in our results and the gains recorded in our shareholders’ equity was a total increase in our shareholders’ equity from the November 2015 transaction of R$4,830 million. For further details, see Note 3 of our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report. Steel Markets and Product Mix Supply and Demand for Steel Prices of steel are sensitive to changes in worldwide and local demand, which in turn are affected by worldwide and country-specific economic cycles, and to available production capacity. While the export price of steel (which is denominated in U.S. dollars or Euros, depending on the export destination) is the spot price, there is no exchange trading of steel or uniform pricing. Unlike other commodity products, steel is not completely fungible due to wide differences in terms of size, chemical composition, quality and specifications, all of which impact prices. Many companies (including us) discount their list prices for regular customers, making their actual transaction prices difficult for us to determine. Historically, export prices and margins have been lower than domestic prices and margins because of the logistics costs, taxes and tariffs. The portion of production that is exported is affected by domestic demand, exchange rate fluctuations and the prices that can be charged in the international markets. The following table shows Brazilian steel production and apparent consumption (domestic sales plus imports) and global production and demand for the periods indicated: | | 2012(1) | | 2011 | | 2010 | 2015(1) | 2014 | 2013 | | | | | | | | | | Brazilian Market(in thousands of tons)(2) | | | | | | | | | Total Flat and Long Steel | | | | | | | | | Production | | 26,381 | | 25,053 | | 25,450 | 22,629 | 24,917 | 26,264 | Apparent Consumption | | 25,426 | | 25,053 | | 26,104 | 21,328 | 25,606 | 25,253 | Hot-Rolled Coils and Sheets | | | | | | | | | Production | | - | | 4,086 | | 4,592 | | 4,541 | 4,262 | Apparent Consumption | | - | | 3,496 | | 3,823 | | 3,602 | 3,627 | Cold-Rolled Coils and Sheets | | | | | | | | | Production | | - | | 2,738 | | 3,159 | | 2,516 | 2,753 | Apparent Consumption | | - | | 2,728 | | 3,419 | | 2,843 | 2,764 | Galvanized Sheets | | | | | | | | | Production | | - | �� | 2,582 | | 2,449 | | 2,887 | 3,020 | Apparent Consumption | | - | | 2,789 | | 3,243 | | 3,588 | 3,175 | Tin Plates | | | | | | | | | Production | | - | | 857 | | 774 | | 553 | 934 | Apparent Consumption | | - | | 593 | | 634 | | 534 | 560 | Global Market(in millions of tons) | | | | | | | | | Crude Steel Production | | 1,510 | | 1,518 | | 1,432 | 1,622 | 1,670 | 1,649 | Demand | | - | | 1,485 | | 1,400 | | ___________ | ___________ | | ___________ | | Source: IABr and WSA. 1. Some information for 2012 was not yet available as of the date of this annual report 2. Information about production excludes intra steel companies’ sales. | | | Source: IABr and WSA. | | Source: IABr and WSA. | | (1) Some information for 2015 was not yet available as of the date of this annual report. | | (1) Some information for 2015 was not yet available as of the date of this annual report. | (2) Information about production excludes intra steel companies’ sales. | | (2) Information about production excludes intra steel companies’ sales. | | | | | | | | | |
Table of contents Product Mix and Prices Sales trends in both the domestic and foreign markets are forecasted monthly based on historical data of the preceding months. CSN uses its own information system to remain current on market developments so that it can respond swiftly to fluctuations in demand. CSN considers its flexibility in shifting between markets, and its ability to monitor and optimize inventory levels in light of changing demand, as key to its success. We have a strategy of increasing the portion of our sales attributable to higher value-added coated products, particularly galvanized flat steel and tin plate products. Galvanized products are directed at the automotive, construction and home appliance industries. Tin plate products are used by the steel packaging market. Sales Volume(1) | | | Tons | | | % of Sales Volume | | | | | | | In Market* | | Total | | | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | Domestic Sales | | | | | | | | | | | | Slabs | | 6 | 11 | 11 | | 0% | 0% | 0% | | 0% | 0% | 0% | Hot-Rolled | | 1,070 | 1,521 | 2,107 | | 36% | 41% | 45% | | 21% | 29% | 34% | Cold-Rolled | | 558 | 682 | 798 | | 19% | 18% | 17% | | 11% | 13% | 13% | Galvanized | | 820 | 1,028 | 1,248 | | 27% | 28% | 27% | | 16% | 20% | 20% | Tin Mill | | 374 | 423 | 486 | | 13% | 11% | 11% | | 7% | 8% | 9% | Long Steel | | 161 | 52 | | | 5% | 1% | | | 3% | 1% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Subtotal | | 2,988 | 3,718 | 4,650 | | 100% | 100% | 100% | | 60% | 72% | 76% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Sales abroad | | | | | | | | | | | | | Slabs | | | - | - | | 0% | 0% | 0% | | 0% | 0% | 0% | Hot-Rolled | | 235 | 53 | 20 | | 12% | 4% | 1% | | 5% | 1% | 0% | Cold-Rolled | | 204 | 65 | 66 | | 10% | 4% | 4% | | 4% | 1% | 1% | Galvanized | | 717 | 481 | 468 | | 35% | 33% | 31% | | 14% | 9% | 8% | Tin Mill | | 141 | 115 | 159 | | 7% | 8% | 10% | | 3% | 2% | 3% | Long Steel | | 724 | 746 | 754 | | 36% | 51% | 54% | | 14% | 14% | 12% | Subtotal | | 2,022 | 1,460 | 1,467 | | 100% | 100% | 100% | | 40% | 28% | 24% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total | | 5,010 | 5,177 | 6,117 | | | | | | 100% | 100% | 100% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total Sales | | | | | | | | | | | | | Slabs | | 6 | 11 | 11 | | | | | | 0% | 0% | 0% | Hot-Rolled | | 1,305 | 1,574 | 2,127 | | | | | | 26% | 30% | 35% | Cold-Rolled | | 762 | 747 | 864 | | | | | | 15% | 14% | 14% | Galvanized | | 1,537 | 1,509 | 1,716 | | | | | | 31% | 29% | 28% | Tin Mill | | 515 | 538 | 645 | | | | | | 10% | 10% | 11% | Long Steel | | 885 | 798 | 754 | | | | | | 18% | 15% | 12% | Total | | 5,010 | 5,177 | 6,117 | | | | | | 100% | 100% | 100% |
¹% of Sales Volume in Market means the participation of each line of product into the group of domestic sales and sales abroad.
Table Of Contentsof contents Net Operating Revenues(1) | | | In millions of R$ | | | | | % of Net Operating Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | In Market* | | | | Total | | | | | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | Domestic Sales | | | | | | | | | | | | Slabs | | 6 | 11 | 10 | | 0% | 0% | 0% | | 0% | 0% | 0% | Hot-Rolled | | 1,789 | 2,769 | 3,471 | | 27% | 33% | 37% | | 16% | 25% | 29% | Cold-Rolled | 1,060 | 1,411 | 1,509 | | 16% | 17% | 16% | | 9% | 13% | 12% | Galvanized | | 1,991 | 2,609 | 2,888 | | 30% | 31% | 30% | | 18% | 23% | 24% | Tin Plate | | 1,475 | 1,589 | 1,651 | | 22% | 19% | 17% | | 13% | 14% | 14% | Long steel | | 291 | 105 | | | 4% | 1% | | | 3% | 1% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Subtotal | | 6,612 | 8,493 | 9,529 | | 100% | 100% | 100% | | 59% | 75% | 79% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Sales abroad | | | | | | | | | | | | Slabs | | - | - | - | | 0% | 0% | 0% | | 0% | 0% | 0% | Hot-Rolled | | 386 | 81 | 30 | | 9% | 3% | 0% | | 3% | 1% | 0% | Cold-Rolled | 403 | 124 | 112 | | 9% | 5% | 4% | | 4% | 1% | 1% | Galvanized | | 1,734 | 1,009 | 893 | | 40% | 37% | 33% | | 16% | 9% | 7% | Tin Plate | | 421 | 280 | 345 | | 10% | 10% | 13% | | 4% | 2% | 3% | Long steel | | 1,388 | 1,269 | 1,223 | | 32% | 46% | 50% | | 12% | 11% | 10% | Subtotal | | 4,332 | 2,764 | 2,603 | | 100% | 100% | 100% | | 39% | 25% | 21% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total | | 10944 | 11,257 | 12,132 | | | | | | 100% | 100% | 100% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total Sales | | | | | | | | | | | | | Slabs | | 6 | 11 | 10 | | | | | | | | | Hot-Rolled | | 2,175 | 2,849 | 3,501 | | | | | | | | | Cold-Rolled | 1,463 | 1,535 | 1,621 | | | | | | | | | Galvanized | | 3,725 | 3,618 | 3,781 | | | | | | | | | Tin Plate | | 1,896 | 1,869 | 1,996 | | | | | | | | | Long steel | | 1,679 | 1,375 | 1,223 | | | | | | | | | Subtotal | | 10,944 | 11,257 | 12,132 | | | | | | 0% | 0% | 0% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | By-Product | | 215 | 89 | 261 | | | | | | 2% | 1% | 2% | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total | | 11,159 | 11,346 | 12,393 | | | | | | 100% | 100% | 100% |
According to IABr, domestic flat steel apparent consumption moved from 13.5 million tons in 2011 to 13.4 million tons in 2012, therefore a reduction
Sales Volume in Market means the participation of each line of product into the group of domestic sales and Net Operating Revenues by Steel Products and Markets The following table sets forth our steel product sales volume and net operating revenues by product and market.
Sales Volume | | Tons | | % of Sales Volume | | | | | | In Market | | Total | | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | Domestic Sales | | | | | | | | | | | | Slabs | 2 | 15 | 51 | | 0% | 0% | 1% | | 0% | 0% | 1% | Hot-Rolled | 2,111 | 1,951 | 1,801 | | 47% | 46% | 44% | | 41% | 40% | 38% | Cold-Rolled | 832 | 770 | 707 | | 18% | 18% | 17% | | 16% | 16% | 15% | Galvanized | 1,105 | 991 | 1,065 | | 25% | 23% | 26% | | 22% | 20% | 22% | Tin Mill | 445 | 489 | 512 | | 10% | 12% | 12% | | 9% | 10% | 11% | | | | | | | | | | | | | Subtotal | 4,495 | 4,216 | 4,135 | | 100% | 100% | 100% | | 88% | 86% | 86% | | | | | | | | | | | | | Sales abroad | | | | | | | | | | | | Slabs | - | - | - | | 0% | 0% | 0% | | 0% | 0% | 0% | Hot-Rolled | 16 | 13 | 1 | | 1% | 2% | 0% | | 0% | 0% | 0% | Cold-Rolled | 52 | 49 | 19 | | 4% | 7% | 3% | | 1% | 1% | 0% | Galvanized | 413 | 457 | 488 | | 31% | 67% | 74% | | 8% | 9% | 10% | Tin Mill | 129 | 161 | 152 | | 10% | 24% | 23% | | 2% | 3% | 3% | Long Steel | 724 | | | | 54% | | | | | | | Subtotal | 1,334 | 680 | 661 | | 100% | 100% | 100% | | 12% | 14% | 14% | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total | 5,829 | 4,896 | 4,796 | | | | | | 100% | 100% | 100% | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total Sales | | | | | | | | | | | | Slabs | 2 | 15 | 51 | | | | | | 0% | 0% | 1% | Hot-Rolled | 2,127 | 1,965 | 1,803 | | | | | | 37% | 40% | 38% | Cold-Rolled | 884 | 819 | 726 | | | | | | 15% | 17% | 15% | Galvanized | 1,518 | 1,447 | 1,553 | | | | | | 26% | 30% | 32% | Tin Mill | 574 | 649 | 664 | | | | | | 10% | 13% | 14% | Long Steel | 724 | | | | | | | | 12% | | | Total | 5,829 | 4,896 | 4,796 | | | | | | 100% | 100% | 100% |
abroad.
Table Of Contentsof contents Net Operating Revenues | | In millions of R$ | | % of Net Operating Revenues | | | | | | In Market | | Total | | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | Domestic Sales | | | | | | | | | | | | Slabs | 2 | 13 | 41 | | 0% | 0% | 1% | | 0% | 0% | 1% | Hot-Rolled | 3,093 | 2,936 | 3,011 | | 37% | 36% | 35% | | 28% | 32% | 31% | Cold-Rolled | 1,474 | 1,412 | 1,387 | | 18% | 18% | 16% | | 14% | 15% | 14% | Galvanized | 2,350 | 2,178 | 2,559 | | 28% | 27% | 30% | | 22% | 24% | 27% | Tin Plate | 1,419 | 1,495 | 1,576 | | 17% | 19% | 18% | | 13% | 16% | 16% | | | | | | | | | | | | | Subtotal | 8,338 | 8,033 | 8,575 | | 100% | 100% | 100% | | 79% | 87% | 89% | | | | | | | | | | | | | Sales abroad | | | | | | | | | | | | Slabs | - | - | - | | 0% | 0% | 0% | | 0% | 0% | 0% | Hot-Rolled | 24 | 19 | 2 | | 0% | 2% | 0% | | 0% | 0% | 0% | Cold-Rolled | 82 | 74 | 27 | | 4% | 6% | 3% | | 1% | 1% | 0% | Galvanized | 750 | 786 | 778 | | 33% | 64% | 70% | | 6% | 8% | 8% | Tin Plate | 293 | 340 | 300 | | 13% | 28% | 27% | | 3% | 4% | 3% | Long steel | 1,129 | | | | 50% | | | | 11% | | | Subtotal | 2,278 | 1,219 | 1,107 | | 100% | 100% | 100% | | 21% | 13% | 11% | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total | 10,616 | 9,252 | 9,682 | | | | | | 100% | 100% | 100% | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total Sales | | | | | | | | | | | | Slabs | 2 | 13 | 41 | | | | | | | | | Hot-Rolled | 3,117 | 2,955 | 3,013 | | | | | | | | | Cold-Rolled | 1,556 | 1,486 | 1,414 | | | | | | | | | Galvanized | 3,100 | 2,964 | 3,337 | | | | | | | | | Tin Plate | 1,712 | 1,835 | 1,876 | | | | | | | | | Long steel | 1,129 | | | | | | | | | | | Subtotal | 10,616 | 9,252 | 9,682 | | | | | | 0% | 0% | 0% | | | | | | | | | | | | | By-Product | 186 | 225 | 244 | | | | | | 2% | 2% | 2% | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total | 10,802 | 9,477 | 9,926 | | | | | | 100% | 100% | 100% |
Brazilian Macro-Economic Scenario
As a company with the vast majority of its operations currently in Brazil, we are affected by the general economic conditions of Brazil. We believe the rate of growth in Brazil is important in determining our future growth capacity and the results of our operations.
The following table shows some Brazilian economic indicators for the periods indicated:
Table Of Contents
| Year ended December 31, | | | | | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | | | | | | | | GDP growth | | 0.9% | | 2.7% | | 7.5% | Inflation (IPCA)(1) | | 5.8% | | 6.5% | | 5.9% | Inflation (IGP-M)(2) | | 7.8% | | 5.1% | | 11.3% | CDI(3) | | 8.4% | | 11.6% | | 9.7% | Appreciation (depreciation) of therealagainst the U.S. dollar | | (8.9)% | | (12.6)% | | 4.3% | Exchange rate at end of period (US$1.00) | | R$2.044 | | R$1.876 | | R$1.666 | Average exchange rate (US$1.00) | | R$1.955 | | R$1.675 | | R$1.759 | Sources: IBGE, Fundação Getúlio Vargas, Central Bank and CETIP. | (1)The IPCA is a consumer price index measured by the IBGE. | (2)The IGP-M is the general market price index measured by the Fundação Getúlio Vargas. | (3)The Interbank Deposit Rate, or CDI, represents the average interbank deposit rate performed during a given day in Brazil (accrued as of the last month of the period, annualized). | | | | | | | |
Effects of Exchange Rate Fluctuations Our export revenues are substantially denominated in U.S. dollars. Ourdollars and our domestic revenues are denominated in Brazilianreais. A significant portion of our cost of products sold is commoditized raw materials, the prices of which are denominated in U.S. dollars. The balance of our cost of products sold and our cash operating expenses (i.e., operating expenses apart from depreciation and amortization) are denominated inreais. The appreciationdepreciation of the U.S. dollarBrazilian real against the U.S dollarreal has the following effects on the results of our operations expressed in U.S. dollars:operations: · Domestic revenues tend to be lower (in comparison with prior years) and this effect is magnifiedpartially offset to the extent to which we sell more products than usual in the domestic as opposed to the foreign market; · The impact ofrealdenominated costs of products sold and operating costs tend to be lower; and · Financial expenses are increased to the extent to which theour exposure to U.S. dollar-denominated debt is not protected. However, to the extent our future export transactions are hedged by our U.S. dollar denominated debt, our foreign exchange variation generated from the debt used as a hedge instrument is recognized directly in net equity as Other Comprehensive Income and will be charged against income at the time the future export transactions occur. The appreciationdepreciation of theBrazilian realagainst the U.S.U.S dollarhas the following effects on the results of our operations expressed in U.S. dollars:operations: · DomesticForeign revenues tend to be higherlower (in comparison with prior years) and this effect is magnifiedpartially offset to the extent to which we sell more products than usual in the domestic market; · The impact ofreal denominated costs of products sold and operating costs tends to be higher; and · Financial incomeexpense is increasedreduced to the extent to which theour exposure to U.S. dollar-denominated debt is not protected. However, to the extent our future export transactions are hedged by our U.S. dollar denominated debt, our foreign exchange variation generated from the debt used as a hedge instrument is recognized directly in net equity as Other Comprehensive Income and will be charged against income at the time the future export transactions occur. The impact of fluctuations in the exchange rate of thereal against other currencies on the results of our operations can be seen in the “foreign exchange and monetary gain (loss), net” line in our income statement, although that amount is partially offset by the net financial income (or expense) attributable tothe profit (or loss) on the derivative transaction of our foreign currency-denominated debt. In order to minimize the effects of the exchange rate fluctuations, we often engage inmay use derivative transactions, including currency swap and foreign currency option agreements. For a discussion of the possible impact of fluctuations in the foreign currency exchange and interest rates on our principal financial instruments and positions, see “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”
Table Of Contentsof contents Effects of Inflation and Interest Rates Inflation rates in Brazil have been significantly volatile in the past. Inflation rates remained relatively stable from 2003 to 2004, decreased in 2005 and 2006 and increased in 2007 and 2008. In 2009, for the first time since its creation in 1989, the IGP-M inflation index recorded a deflation in a calendar year, equivalent to 1.71%. In 2010,2012, the index increased 11.3%7.8% and in 20112013, 2014 and 2012,2015, the IGP-M index increased 5.1%5.9%, 3.7% and 7.8%10.5%, respectively.respectively, driven by domestic factors (including the increase in regulated prices, such as gasoline and energy) as well external factors such as the strength of the U.S. dollar. Inflation also affects our financial performance by increasing some of our costs and expenses denominated inreais that are not linked to the U.S. dollar. Our cash costs and operating expenses are substantially denominated inreais and have tended to follow the Brazilian inflation ratio, because our suppliers and service providers generally increase or decrease prices to reflect Brazilian inflation. In addition, some of ourreal-denominated debt is indexed to take into account the effects of inflation. Under this debt, the principal amount is generally adjusted with reference to inflation indexes. In addition, a significant portion of ourreal-denominated debt bears interest based on the Interbank Deposit Certificate (Certificado de Depósito Interbancário), or CDI, rate which is partially adjusted for inflation. The table below shows the Brazilian general price index and the CDI rates for the periods shown.shown: | | Year ended December 31, | | | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | | | | | | | | Inflation (IGP-M)(1) | | 7.8% | | 5.1% | | 11.3% | CDI(2) | | 8.4% | | 11.6% | | 9.7% | _______________ | Source: Fundação Getúlio Vargas, or FGV, and CETIP. | (1) The IGP-M inflation is the general market price index measured by the FGV. | (2) The Interbank Deposit Rate, or CDI, represents the average interbank deposit rate performed during a given day in Brazil (accrued as of the last month of the period, annualized). |
Year Ended December 31, | | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | Inflation (IGP-M)1 | | 10.50% | | 3.70% | | 5.90% | CDI2 | | 13.20% | | 10.80% | | 8.10% | Source: Fundação Getúlio Vargas, or FGV, and CETIP. | | | | | | | | (1) The IGP-M inflation is the general market price index measured by the FGV. | (2) The Interbank Deposit Rate, or CDI, represents the average interbank deposit rate performed during a given day in Brazil (accrued as of the last month of the period, annualized). |
Accounting for mining production utilized by our steel production We are currently self-sufficient regarding the iron ore used in our steel production.production except for pellets. The iron ore required is extracted from our Casa de Pedra mine, which in 20122015 amounted to approximately 6.15.0 million tons of its total iron ore production of approximately 19.826.2 million tons. The remainder of the iron ore production is sold to third parties in Brazil and throughout the world. The cost of iron ore regarding our steel production is recorded on our income statement in the cost of goods sold line item as its extraction cost plus transport from the mine. In 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010,2013, these costs were R$280R$366 million, R$283422 million and R$239372 million, respectively.
Table of contents After the closing of the transaction between CSN and the Asian Consortium, as announced on December 12, 2014 and November 30, 2015 the cost of iron ore regarding our steel production will be recorded as from December, 2015 at adjusted market prices and conditions, instead of its extraction cost plus transport from the mine, as our mining operations will be concentrated in our controlled company, Congonhas Minérios S.A, which will sell iron ore to CSN to produce steel. Details of the transaction between CSN and the Asian Consortium and related conditions precedent for closing are described on Item “4D. Property, Plant and Equipment”, Acquisitions and Dispositions. Critical Accounting Estimates We prepared our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 20122015 in accordance with IFRS, as issued by the IASB. In preparing our consolidated financial statements, we make estimates concerning a variety of matters. Some of these matters are highly uncertain, and our estimates involve judgments we make based on the information available to us. In the discussion below, we have identified several of these matters for which our financial presentation would be materially affected if either (1) we used different estimates that we could reasonably have used or (2) in the future we change our estimates in response to changes that are reasonably likely to occur. This discussion addresses only those estimates that we consider most important based on the degree of uncertainty and the likelihood of a material impact if we used a different estimate. There are many other areas in which we use estimates about uncertain matters, but the reasonably likely effect of changed or different estimates is not material to our financial presentation.
Table Of Contents
Impairment of long-lived assets, intangible assets, goodwill and financial assets In accordance with IAS 36 “Impairment of assets”, long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. A determination of the fair value of an asset requires management to make certain assumptions and estimates with respect to projected cash inflows and outflows related to future revenues and expenditures. These assumptions and estimates can be influenced by different external and internal factors, such as economic and industry trends, interest rates and changes in the marketplace. A change in the assumptions and estimates that we use could change our estimate of the expected future net cash flows and lead to the recognition of an impairment charge in results of operations relating to our property, plant and equipment. Assets that have an indefinite useful life, such as goodwill, are not subject to amortization and are tested annually for impairment in accordance with IAS 36 “Impairment of assets”. Assets that are subject to amortization are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. Goodwill is allocated to Cash-Generating Units (CGUs) for impairment testing purposes. The allocation is made to Cash-Generating Units or groups of Cash-Generating Units that are expected to benefit from the business combination from which the goodwill arose, and the unit is not greater than the operating segment. Financial assets are reviewed for impairment at the end of each reporting period and we assess whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset or a group of financial assets is impaired. In the case of equity securities classified as available-for-sale, a significant or prolonged decline in the fair value of an investment in an equity instrument below its cost is also objective evidence of impairment. Determining what is considered a “significant” or “prolonged” decline requires judgment.
Table of contents For this judgment we assess, among other factors, the historical changes in the equity prices, the duration and proportion in which the fair value of the investment is lower than its cost, and the financial health and short-term prospects of the business for the investee, including factors such as: industry and segment performance, changes in technology, and operating and financial cash flows. If there is any of this evidence of impairment of available-for-sale financial assets, the cumulative loss measured as the difference between the acquisition cost and the current fair value, less any impairment loss on the financial asset previously recorded in profit or loss is reclassified from shareholders' equity and recognized in the income statement. Impairment losses recognized in the income statement as available-for-sale instruments are not reversed through the income statement. On December 31, 2012,2015, we owned, directly and indirectly, 20.69% of the preferred shares (USIM5) and 14.13% of the common shares (USIM3)(USIM3) of Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais S.A. (“Usiminas”), resulting from various acquisitions on the stock exchange since mid-2010. The instruments are classified as financial instruments available for sale and measured at their fair value based on their quoted market price in the Brazilian stock exchange (BOVESPA) on December 31, 2012. Considering the decline in market value of the shares of Usiminas during 2011 and 2012, we evaluated whether, at the balance sheet date, there is objective evidence of impairment of our investments in Usiminas. The Company performed a detailed analysis of the percentage and period of decline, characteristics of the instruments, the segment in which Usiminas operates and volatility of the instruments.
The table below illustrates this index for a twelve-year period, up to December 31, 2011, a sufficiently long timeframe to eliminate volatility peaks caused by domestic and international economic crises:
| | Volatility | | Period | | | | | USIM3 | | USIM5 | January 3, 2000 - December 31, 2011 | 50.42% | | 48.57% |
Based on this information, the criteria adopted by management, and the relevant accounting and legal rules, management concluded that the decline in the market value as compared to the acquisition cost of the USIM3 and USIM5 shares as of June 30, 2012, of 66.3% and 59.0%, respectively, should be considered a significant decline in the market value of these equity instruments.
Considering the quantitative and qualitative analyses above, management concluded, in its best judgment, that there is evidence of impairment of the investment in Usiminas’ shares as of June 30, 2012, and, consequently, reclassified the accumulated losses recorded in other comprehensive income amounting to R$1,335 million, net ofincome tax and social contribution, to profit/loss for the period, recognizing R$2,023 million in other operating expenses and R$688 million in deferred taxes, and this is the current position in December 31, 2012.
Table Of Contents
For a more detailed description of our policy regarding impairment of financial assets, see Note 13.II. to the consolidated financial statements included in “Item 18. Financial Statements.”
2015. Depreciation and amortization The basis for calculation of depreciation is the cost of the asset less the estimated residual value upon sale. While no specific depreciation method is recommended, the method chosen should be applied consistently for all significant components of assets and allocation of the depreciation should be on a systematic basis for each one of the accounting periods that best represents the realization of the economic benefits during the usable lives of assets. In light of the necessity to reviewThe useful lives at leastare reviewed every financialfiscal year in 2012 management performed the review for all the Company’s units. See further details in Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements.
Fair value of business combinations We estimateThe acquisition method is used to account for each business combination that we conduct. The payment obligation transferred by acquiring an entity is measured by the fair value of the assets transferred, liabilities incurred and equity instruments issued. The consideration transferred includes the fair value of any asset or liability resulting from a contingent consideration arrangement, where applicable. Acquisition-related costs are recognized in profit or loss for the year, as incurred. Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed of ourin a business combinations as required by IFRS 3 “Business Combination”. Accordingly, when determiningcombination are initially measured at their fair values at the purchase price allocations of our business acquisitions, we adjustacquisition date. We recognize non-controlling interests in the acquiree according to fair value certain items such as inventories, property, plant and equipment, mines, present value of long-term assets and liabilities, among others, which are determined by independent appraisals that perform the valuations for us.
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the Company’s share of the net fair value of the identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities of the acquired company. If there is any negative goodwill determined by the acquirerproportional non-controlling interest held in the fair value of the assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities acquired in relation to the cost of acquisition, the Company should recognize it immediately in the statement of income.acquiree’s net assets.
Derivatives IAS 39, “ Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement”, requires that we recognize all derivative financial instruments as either assets or liabilities on our balance sheet and measure such instruments at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded in each period in the statement of income or in other comprehensive income, in the latter case depending on whether a transaction is designated as an effective hedge. Our derivative instruments do not qualify for hedge accounting. Changes in the fair value of any of these derivative instruments are immediately recorded in the statements of income under “Other gains (losses), net"“Financial income” and “Financial expenses”. Although the Company uses derivativeWe use derivatives for hedging purposes, it does notpurposes. We apply hedge accounting.accounting on our cash flow hedge in order to protect ourselves against exposure to changes in cash flows due to foreign currency risk associated with our recognized debt and with highly probable forecast transactions that may affect our net results. Our hedging instrument are non-derivative monetary items. Therefore, the effective portion of the foreign exchange gains and losses are accounted for in other comprehensive income. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument, if any, is accounted for in income (loss). With respect to the fair value measurement, we must make assumptions such as to future foreign currency exchange and interest rates. For a discussion of the possible impact of fluctuations in the foreign currency exchange and interest rates on our principal financial instruments and positions, see “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.” Pension plans
Table of contents We sponsor defined benefit pension plans covering some of our retirees. We account for these benefits in accordance with IAS 19, “Employee Benefits”. The determination of the amount of our obligations for pension benefits depends on certain actuarial assumptions. These assumptions are described in Note 2827 to our consolidated financial statements and include, among others, the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and increases in salaries. In accordance with IFRS, when the benefits of a plan are increased, the portion of the increased benefit related to past services of employees is recognized under the straight-line method over the average periodin profit or loss until the benefits become vested. When the benefits become immediately vested, the expense is immediately recognized in profit or loss. The Company has chosen to recognize all the actuarial gains and losses resulting from defined benefit plans immediately in other comprehensive income and then transferred within equity. If the plan is extinguished, actuarial gains and losses are recognized in profit or loss. Some of the Company’s entities offered a postretirement healthcare benefit to their employees. The right to these benefits is usually contingent upon an employee remaining in employment until the retirement age as well as thecompletion of the minimum length of service. The expected costs of these benefits were accumulated during the employment period, and are calculated using the same accounting method used for the defined benefit pension plans.
Table Of Contents
Deferred taxes We compute and pay income taxes based on results of operations determined under Brazilian Corporate Law. A deferred income tax liability is recognized for all temporary tax differences, while a deferred income tax asset is recognized only to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary difference can be utilized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are classified as long-term. Tax assets and liabilities are offset if the entity has a legally enforceable right to offset them and they are related to taxes levied by the same taxing authority. If the criterion for offset of current tax assets and liabilities is met, deferred tax assets and liabilities will also be offset. The income tax related to items recognized directly in equity in the current period or in a prior period is recognized directly in the same account. We regularly review the deferred income tax assets for recoverability and will only recognize these if we believe that it is probable that the deferred income tax assets will be realized, based on historical taxable income, projected future taxable income, and the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences. If we operate at a loss or are unable to generate sufficient future taxable income, or if there is a material change in the actual effective tax rates or discount rates, the time period over which the underlying temporary differences become taxable or deductible, or any change in its future projections, we reduce the carrying amount of deferred income tax assets to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow the benefit of part or all of that deferred income tax asset to be realized. Contingencies and disputed taxes We record provisions for contingencies relating to legal proceedings with respect to which we deem the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome to be probable and the loss can be reasonably estimated. This determination is made based on the legal opinion of our internal and external legal counsel. We believe these contingencies are properly recognized in our financial statements in accordance with IAS 37 “Provision, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets”. We are also involved in judicial and administrative proceedings that are aimed at obtaining or defending our legal rights with respect to taxes that we believe to be unconstitutional or otherwise not required to be paid by us. We believe that these proceedings will ultimately result in the realization of contingent tax credits or benefits that can be used to settle direct and indirect tax obligations owed to the Brazilian Federal or State Governments or to settle municipal tax obligations owed to the corresponding Municipality as per our laws. We do not recognize these contingent tax credits or benefits in our financial statements until realization of such gain contingencies has been resolved. This occurs when a final irrevocable decision is rendered by the courts in Brazil. When we use contingent tax credits or benefits based on favorable temporary court decisions that are still subject to appeal to offset current direct or indirect tax obligations, we maintain the legal obligation accrued in our financial statements until a final irrevocable judicial decision on those contingent tax credits or benefits is rendered. The accrual for the legal obligation related to the current direct or indirect tax obligations offset is not reversed until such time as the utilization of the contingent tax credits or benefits is ultimately realized. The accounting for the contingent tax credits is in accordance with accounting for contingent assets under IAS 37. Our accruals include interest on the tax obligations that we may offset with contingent tax credits or benefits at the interest rate defined in the relevant tax law. The recorded accruals for these disputed taxes and other contingencies may change in the future due to new developments in each matter, such as changes in legislation, irrevocable, final judicial decisions specific to us, or changes in approach, such as a change in settlement strategy in dealing with these matters. See “Item 8A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal Proceedings” forFor further information on the judicial and administrative proceedings in which we are involved.involved, see “Item 8A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information—Legal Proceedings”.
Table of contents Allowance for doubtful accounts We consider a provision for bad debts in our trade accounts receivable in order to reflect our expectation as to the net realizable value thereof. This provision is estimated based on an analysis of our receivables and is periodically reviewed to maintain real expectation of collectability of our accounts receivable. Mineral Reserves and Useful life of mine
Table Of Contents The estimates of probable and proven reserves are periodically evaluated and updated. These reserves are determined using generally accepted geological valuation techniques. The method of calculation requires the use of different assumptions by internal specialists and changes in some of these assumptions may have significant impact on probable and proven iron ore reserves recorded and on the useful life of mines.
The tangible assets that are mine-specific, are depreciated over the shorter of the normal useful lives of such assets or the useful life of the mine. Exploration expenditures are recognized as expenses until the viability of mining activities is established, after this period the subsequent development costs are capitalized. Exploration and valuation expenditures include: ·Research and analysis of historical data related to area exploration; ·Topographic, geological, geochemical and geophysical studies; ·Determine the mineral asset’s volume and quality/grade; ·Examine and test the extraction processes and methods; ·Topographic surveys of transportation and infrastructure needs; ·Market and financial studies; The development costs of new mineral deposits or capacity expansion in mine operations are capitalized and amortized using the produced (extracted) units method based on the probable and proven ore quantities. The development stage includes: ·Drillings to define the ore body; ·Access and draining plans; ·Advance removal of overburden (top soil and waste material removed prior to initial mining of the ore body) and waste material (non-economic material that is intermingled with the ore body). Stripping costs (the costs associated with the removal of overburden and other waste materials) incurred during the development of a mine, before production commences, are capitalized as part of the depreciable cost of developing the property. Such costs are subsequently amortized over the useful life of the mine based on proven and probable reserves. Stripping costs in the production phase are included in the cost of the inventory produced, except when a specific extraction campaign is made to access deeper deposits than of the ore body. In these cases, costs are capitalized and taken to noncurrent assets when the mineral ore deposit is extracted and are amortized over the useful life of the ore body. Property, Plant and Equipment In accordance with our accounting policy, the cost of maintenance in operating assets is capitalized when it does not occur annually and results in an increase in the useful life of the asset. Depreciation is recognized on an accrual basis until the next maintenance event of the relevant asset. Expenditures formaintenance and repairs in operating assets, that are necessary to maintain assets under normal conditions of use, are charged to operating costs and expenses, as incurred.
Table of contents As of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the Company capitalized borrowing costs amounting to R$166.4 million, R$165.8 million and R$490.7 million, respectively. These costs are basically estimated for the cement, mining and long steel projects, mainly relating to: new integrated cement plant, (ii) Casa de Pedra expansion (iii); long steel mill in the city of Volta Redonda (RJ). In accordance with our accounting policy, the cost of maintenance in operating assets is capitalized when it does not occur annually and results in an increase in the useful life of the asset. Depreciation is recognized on an accrual basis until the next maintenance event of the relevant asset. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs in operating assets, that are necessary to maintain assets under normal conditions of use, are charged to operating costs and expenses, as incurred. As of December 31, 20112015, 2014 and 20122013, the amountCompany capitalized wasborrowing costs amounting to R$655166.4 million, R$165.8 million and R$ 273490.7 million, respectivelyrespectively. These costs are basically estimated for the cement, mining and long steel projects, mainly relating to: new integrated cement plant, (ii) Casa de Pedra expansion (iii); long steel mill in the amount expended was R$969 million and R$1,219 million, respectively. city of Volta Redonda (RJ). Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Adopted and Not Adopted by Us For a description onThe standards, amendments to standards and interpretations that became effective as from January, 2015 were not applicable to the recentlyGroup.
Additionally, the standards, amendments to standards and IFRS interpretations issued accounting pronouncements, seeby the IASB that are not yet effective and were not early adopted by the Group for the year ended December 31, 2015 is described in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements contained in “Item 18. Financial Statements”.Statements.” Results of Operations The following table presents certain financial information with respect to our operating results for each of the years ended December 31, 2012, 20112015, 2014 and 2010:2013: | | | Income Statement Data: | | 2012 | | 2012 | 2011 | | 2010 | | | (in million of US$, except per share data) | | (in million of R$, except per share data) | Net operating revenues | | 8,268 | | 16,896 | 16,520 | | 14,451 | Cost of products sold | | (5,908) | | (12,072) | (9,801) | | (7,883) | Gross Profit | | 2,361 | | 4,824 | 6,719 | | 6,568 | Operating expenses | | | | | | | | Selling | | (456) | | (932) | (604) | | (482) | General and Administrative | | (282) | | (577) | (576) | | (537) | Share of profit (losses) of investees | | | | (1) | | | | Other Expenses | | (1,331) | | (2,719) | (501) | | (599) | Other Income | | 23 | | 47 | 719 | | 49 | Total | | (2,047) | | (4,182) | (962) | | (1,569) | Operating income | | 314 | | 642 | 5,757 | | 4,998 | | | | | | | | | Financial Income (expenses), net | | (975) | | (1,992) | (2,006) | | (1,911) | Income Before Taxes | | (661) | | (1,351) | 3,751 | | 3,087 | Income Tax | | | | | | | | Current | | (100) | | (205) | (136) | | (363) | Deferred | | 526 | | 1,075 | 52 | | (207) | | | | | | | | | Total | | (235) | | (481) | 3,667 | | 2,516 | | | | | | | | | Net income | | (235) | | (481) | 3,667 | | 2,516 | | | | | | | | | Loss attributable to noncontrolling interest | | (29) | | (60) | (39) | | - | | | | | | | | | Net income attributable to Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional | | (206) | | (420) | 3,706 | | 2,516 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | Income Statement Data: | | 2015 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2013 | | | (in millions of US$, except per share data) | | (in millions of R$, except per share data) | Net operating revenues | | 3,927 | | 15,332 | | 16,126 | | 17,312 | Cost of sales and/or services | | -3,022 | | -11,800 | | -11,592 | | -12,423 | Gross Profit | 905 | | 3,532 | | 4,534 | | 4,889 | Operating expenses | | | | | | | | | Selling | | -368 | | -1,436 | | -1,042 | | -875 | General and administrative | | -121 | | -471 | | -438 | | -486 | Equity in results of affiliated companies | | 297 | | 1,160 | | 331 | | 158 | Other operating expenses | | -342 | | -1,334 | | -657 | | -1,134 | Other operating income | | 955 | | 3,727 | | 90 | | 567 | Total | | 422 | | 1,646 | | -1,716 | | -1,770 | | | | | | | | | | Operating income | | 1,326 | | 5,178 | | 2,818 | | 3,120 | Financial Results | | | | | | | | | Financial income | | 125 | | 492 | | 172 | | 171 | Financial expenses | | -989 | | -3,865 | | -3,253 | | -2.683 | | | | | | | | | | Income before taxes | | -462 | | -1,805 | | -263 | | 608 | Income taxes | | | | | | | | | Current | | -98 | | -381 | | -528 | | -1,291 | Deferred | | 49 | | 192 | | 679 | | 1,217 | | | | | | | | | | Total | | -48 | | -189 | | 151 | | -74 | | | | | | | | | | Net income (loss) for the year | | 414 | | 1,616 | | -112 | | 534 | | | | | | | | | | Net Income (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest | | 92 | | 358 | | -7 | | 25 | | | | | | | | | | Net (loss) income attributable to Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional | | 322 | | 1,258 | | -105 | | 509 | | | | | | | | | | Basic (loss) earnings per common share | | 0.2374 | | 0.9269 | | -0.0744 | | 0,34913 | Diluted (loss) earnings per common share | | 0.2374 | | 0.9269 | | -0.0744 | | 0,34913 |
Table of contents Year 20122015 Compared to Year 20112014 In addition to the consolidated figures reported above, the Company reports itsWe maintain integrated operations in five business segments: steel, mining, cement, logistics, (including port and railway)cement and energy. The operating resultsWe manage and control the performance of each segment are disclosed separately. The information on CSN’s fiveour various business segments, is derivedconsidering the proportional interest in our jointly controlled entities, MRS Logística S.A., and CBSI - Companhia Brasileira de Serviços de Infraestrutura, reflected on figures described below, which may differ from those accounted according to IFRS.
In 2013, the consolidated financial statements.
statement was substantially impacted by the deconsolidation of Transordestina Logística S.A., which began to be recognized under the equity accounting method, due to the partial spin-off and the entry into effect of the new shareholders’agreement. Table Of ContentsSince December 1, 2015, we have been consolidating Namisa, which was recorded under the equity method until November 30, 2015.On December 31, 2015 Namisa was merged into Congonhas Minérios.
Our consolidated results for the years ended December 31, 20122015 and 20112014 by business segment are presented below: | | | Logistics | | | | Year Ended December 31, 2012 | | | | | | | | | | Net operating revenues | 10,802 | 4,485 | 151 | 1,067 | 388 | 229 | (226) | 16,896 | Domestic Market | 8,478 | 713 | 151 | 1,067 | 388 | 229 | (531) | 10,495 | Export Market | 2,324 | 3,772 | | | | | 305 | 6,401 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Logistics | | | | Year Ended December 31, 2011 | | | | | | | | | | Net operating revenues | 9,478 | 5,856 | 143 | 1,023 | 333 | 183 | (496) | 16,520 | Domestic Market | 8,190 | 834 | 143 | 1,023 | 333 | 183 | (565) | 10,142 | Export Market | 1,287 | 5,022 | | | | | 69 | 6,378 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, 2015 | (in millions of R$) | Consolidated Results | Steel | Mining | Port Logistics | Railway Logistics | Cement | Energy | Eliminations | Consolidated | Net operating revenues | 11,203 | 3,187 | 213 | 1,157 | 432 | 245 | -1,104 | 15,332 | Domestic Market | 6,757 | 175 | 213 | 1,157 | 432 | 245 | -1,227 | 7,752 | Export Market | 4,446 | 3,012 | - | - | - | - | 122 | 7,580 | Cost of goods sold | -9,127 | -2,324 | -142 | -788 | -330 | -196 | 1,107 | -11,800 | Gross profit | 2,076 | 864 | 71 | 369 | 102 | 49 | 2 | 3,532 | Adjusted EBITDA* | 1,791 | 1,171 | 63 | 469 | 75 | 43 | -361 | 3,251 | | Year Ended December 31, 2014 | (in millions of R$) | Consolidated Results | Steel | Mining | Port Logistics | Railway Logistics | Cement | Energy | Eliminations | Consolidated | Net operating revenues | 11,492 | 4,109 | 202 | 1,105 | 440 | 324 | -1,547 | 16,126 | Domestic Market | 8,650 | 307 | 202 | 1,105 | 440 | 324 | -1,063 | 9,966 | Export Market | 2,841 | 3,803 | | | | | -484 | 6,160 | Cost of goods sold | -8,672 | -2,986 | -138 | -753 | -295 | -187 | 1,439 | -11,592 | Gross profit | 2,820 | 1,123 | 65 | 352 | 145 | 138 | -109 | 4,534 | Adjusted EBITDA* | 2,935 | 1,429 | 68 | 407 | 116 | 135 | -361 | 4,729 |
*For more information on Adjusted EBITDA see “Results of Operations – Operations—Adjusted EBITDA”.EBITDA.”
Table of contents Net Operating Revenues Net operating revenues weredecreased R$16,896 million in 2012, an increase of R$376794 million, or 2.3%5%, from R$16,52016,126 million recorded in 2011,2014 to R$15,332 million in 2015, due to an increasethe lower prices practiced in revenues from our steel, cement, logistics and energy segments, partially offset by a decrease in revenues from ourthe mining segment. Net domestic revenues increased 3.5%decreased 22%, from R$10,1429,966 million in 20112014 to R$10,4957,752 million in 2012 and total2015, while net revenues of exports and sales abroad increased 0.4%23%, from R$6,3786,160 million in 20112014 to R$6,4017,580 million in 2012.2015, given the slowdown in the domestic economy and our strategy to redirect our sales to the foreign market. Steel Steel net operating revenues increaseddecreased R$1,324289 million, or 14.0%3%, from R$9,47811,492 million in 20112014 to R$10,80211,203 million in 2012, mainly2015, due to an increasea decrease in sales volume of 19.1%4% from 4,8965,177 thousand tons in 20112014 to 5,8294,990 thousand tons in 2012.2015. Steel net domestic revenues increased 3.5%decreased R$1,894 million, or 22%, from R$8,1908,650 million in 20112014 to R$8,4786,757 million in 2012, mainly2015, due to an increase of 6.6%a decrease in sales volume of 20%, from 4,216 thousand3,717 in 2014 to 2,969 million tons in 2011 to 4,495 thousand tons in 2012.2015. Steel net revenues from exports and sales abroad increased 80.5%R$1,605 million, or 56%, from R$1,2872,841 million in 20112014 to R$2,3244,446 million in 2012, with2015, due to an increase of 39% in the sales volume increasing 96.2% to 1,334the foreign markets, based on the strategy to redirect sales as discussed above, from 1,460 in 2014 to 2,022 thousand tons in 2012, from 680 thousand tons in 2011, due to the 724 thousand tons sold by SWT, which were included in our consolidated results as of February 2012.2015. Net Operating Revenues Mining MiningTotal mining net operating revenues totaleddecreased R$4,485922 million, or 22%, from R$4,109 million in 2012,2014 to R$3,187 million in 2015, mainly due to a decrease of R$1,371 million, or 23.4%, from R$5,856 million43% in 2011, due to the lower volume of iron ore sold, affected by an above average rainy season in the first half of the year, and a decrease in averageinternational iron ore prices, from US$97/dmt in 2014 to US$55/dmt in 2015, principally due to an increased supply capacity in Australia and Brazil, in addition to the significant slowdown in the international market.infrastructure and construction sector, major steel consumers in China.
Mining net export revenues decreased R$1,250791 million, or 24.9%21%, from R$5,0223,803 million in 20112014 to R$3,7723,012 million in 2012, due to a decrease of 12.0% in sales volume from 22,392 thousand tons in 2011 to 19,703 thousand tons in 2012 and a decrease in average international iron ore prices.
Table Of Contents
Mining net domestic revenues decreased R$121 million, or 14.5%, from R$834 million in 2011 to R$713 million in 2012,2015, mainly due to the decrease of 43% in average international iron ore prices partially offset by increased export sales volumevolumes.
Mining net domestic revenues decreased R$132 million, or 43%, from 1,457 thousand tonsR$307 million in 20112014 to 479 thousand tonsR$175 million in 2012.2015, mainly due to the decrease in iron ore prices and, to reduced sales volumes. Logistics
Table of contents Logistics net operating revenues increased R$62 million, or 5%, from R$1,307 million in 2012 were2014 to R$1,2181,370 million an increase of 4.5% as compared with the net logistics operating revenues of R$1,166 million reported in 2011.2015. In 2012,2015, net revenue from railway logistics totaled R$1,0671,157 million and net revenue from port logistics amounted to R$151213 million, while in 2011,2014, net revenue from railway logistics totaled R$1,0231,105 million and net revenue from port logistics amounted to R$143202 million. Cement Cement net revenue increaseddecreased R$559 million, or 16.5%2%, from R$440 million in 2014 to R$388432 million in 2012, compared with revenue of R$333 million in 2011,2015, mainly due to an increasea decrease of 12.4%, or 2171% in cement sales volume from 2,209 thousand tons in sales volume from 1,7552014 to 2,182 thousand tons in 2011 to 1,972 thousand tons in 2012, as we continue the ramp up of our cement plant in Volta Redonda.2015. Energy In 2012 ourOur net operating revenues from the energy segment totaleddecreased R$229 million, an increase of R$4680 million, or 25.1% as compared with25% of total net operating revenuesrevenue from the energy segment, from R$324 million in 2014 to R$245 million in 2015, mainly due to the reduction of R$183 million reported in 2011 in this segment.surplus energy available for selling and lower energy prices.
Cost of Products Sold In 2012, consolidatedConsolidated cost of products sold amountedincreased R$208 million, or 2% from R$11,592 million in 2014 to R$12,07211,800 million representingin 2015, due to the impact from the foreign exchange variation on steel production cost partially compensated by a 23.2% increase as compared toreduction of R$9,801662 million recorded in 2011.the cost of products sold in the mining segment.
Steel Consolidated steel costs of products sold were R$8,8689,127 million in 2012,2015, representing a 26.0%5% increase as compared to the R$7,0388,672 million in 2014, mainly due to increased cost of imported raw materials, higher electricity consumption and maintenance. The following table sets forth our flat steel production costs, the production costs per ton of steel and the portion of production costs attributable to the primary components of our costs of production. With the exception of coal and coke, which we import, and some metals (such as aluminum, zinc and tin) with domestic prices linked to international prices, our production costs are mostly denominated inreais. Steel Production Cost | 2015 | 2014 | Variation 2015 Vs. 2014 | | R$ million | R$ / ton | R$ million | R$ / ton | R$ million | R$ / ton | Raw Materials | 3,242 | 726 | 3,398 | 702 | -156 | -34.6 | Iron Ore | 377 | 84.33 | 422 | 87.3 | -45 | 13.2 | Coal | 670 | 150 | 748 | 154.8 | -78 | -4.3 | Coke | 874 | 195.7 | 694 | 143.6 | 180 | -9.9 | Metals | 443 | 99.1 | 335 | 69.4 | 108 | 7.8 | Outsourced Slabs | 278 | 62.29 | 467 | 96.7 | -189 | -38.2 | Pellets | 296 | 66.26 | 399 | 82.6 | -103 | 3.1 | Scrap | 48 | 10.68 | 74 | 15.3 | -26 | -7.3 | Other1 | 256 | 57.4 | 251 | 51.9 | 5 | 1 | Labor | 777 | 173.9 | 706 | 146.1 | 71 | 18.9 | Other Production Costs | | 2,471 | | 553 | | 2,359 | | 488.2 | | 112 | -33.3 | Energy / Fuel | 718 | 160.9 | 495 | 102.4 | 223 | -21.5 | Services and Maintenance | 866 | 194 | 910 | 188.3 | -44 | 7.1 | Tools and Supplies | 264 | 59.1 | 260 | 53.9 | 4 | -4.5 | Depreciation | 408 | 91.4 | 575 | 119.1 | -167 | -10.7 | Other | 214 | 47.9 | 119 | 24.5 | 95 | -3.7 | Total | 6,489 | 1,453 | 6,455 | 1,336 | 34 | -49 | (1) Includes limestone and dolomite | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Table of contents We are self-sufficient in almost all raw materials used in the production of steel. The principal raw materials we use in our integrated steel mill include iron ore, coke, coal (from which we produce most of our coke necessities), limestone, dolomite, aluminum, tin and zinc. In addition, our production operations consume water, gases, electricity and ancillary materials. We obtain our iron ore requirements except pellets from our Casa de Pedra mine located in the state of Minas Gerais, and the limestone and dolomite from our Bocaina mine in the city of Arcos, in the state of Minas Gerais. All coal and a portion of the coke we consume are acquired from different international producers “See Item 4B—Raw Materials and Suppliers.” Our steel production costs increased R$34 million, or 0,5%, from R$6,455 million in 2014 to R$6,489 million in 2015, mainly due to the increased cost of imported raw materials, higher electricity consumption and maintenance. Our costs regarding purchase of outsourced slabs from third parties decreased R$189 million, or 40%, from R$467 million in 2014 to R$278 million in 2015, due to lower consumption of slabs purchased from third parties. Our coke costs increased R$180 million, or 26%, from R$694 million in 2014 to R$874 million in 2015, corresponding to 13% of our steel production cost and an increase of 45% in energy consumption, partially offset by the depreciation of the real. Our coal costs decreased R$78 million, or 10%, from R$748 million in 2014 to R$670 million in 2015, corresponding to 10% of our steel production cost, mainly due to lower international coal prices, partially offset by the depreciation of the real. Our scrap costs decreased R$26 million, or 35%, from R$74 million in 2014 to R$48 million in 2015, mainly due to lower consumption. Other production costs including energy/fuel, services and maintenance, tools and supplies and depreciation increased R$112 million or 5%, from R$2,359 million in 2014 to R$2,471 million in 2015. Mining Our mining costs of products sold decreased R$662 million, or 22%, from R$2,986 million in 2014 to R$2,324 million in 2015, mainly due to the decrease in volume sold and purchased from third parties. Logistics Cost of services attributable to our logistics segment increased R$39 million, or 4%, from R$891 million in 2014 to R$930 million in 2015, due to the increases of R$35 million and R$4 million in the costs of railway logistics and port logistic services, respectively. For railway logistics the increase was mainly due to an increase in costs from MRS. For port logistics services, the increase was the higher volume of steel products transported during the period. Cement Cost of products sold attributable to our cement segment increased R$35 million, or 12%, from R$295 million reported in 2014 to R$330 million in 2015, mainly due to purchase of Clinker to supply the Arcos plant. Energy
Table of contents Cost of products sold attributable to our energy segment increased R$9 million, or 5%, from R$187 million in 2014 to R$196 million in 2015. Gross Profit Gross profit decreased R$1,002 million, or 22%, from R$4,534 million in 2014 to R$3,532 million in 2015, due to the decrease of R$794 million in net revenues and to the increase of R$208 million in cost of products sold, as discussed above.. Steel Gross profit in the steel segment decreased R$744 million, or 26%, from R$2,820 million in 2014 to R$2,076 million in 2015. Mining Our gross profit in the mining segment decreased R$260 million, or 23% from R$1,123 million in 2014 to R$864 million in 2015. Logistics Gross profit in the logistics segment decreased R$23 million, or 5%, from R$416 million in 2014 to R$440 million in 2015. Cement Gross profit in the cement segment decreased R$44 million, or 30% from R$145 million in 2014 to R$102 million in 2015. Energy Gross profit in energy segment decreased R$89 million, or 64%, from R$138 million in 2014 to R$49 million in 2015. Selling, general and administrative Selling, general and administrative expenses increased R$426 million, or 29%, from R$1,480 million in 2014 to R$1,906 million in 2015. Selling expenses increased R$394 million, or 38%, from R$1,042 million in 2014 to R$1,436 million in 2015, mainly due to an increase of iron ore CIF sales (sales including insurance and freight costs), while general and administrative expenses increased R$32 million, or 7%, from R$438 million in 2014 to R$470 million in 2015. Other operating income (expenses) We had an increase of R$2,958 million in “Other Operating Income and Expenses” to a net operating income of R$2,392 million in 2015 as compared to R$567 million of other net operating expenses in 2014 mainly due to the gain of R$3,413 million, composed of a positive impact of R$2,792 million of remeasurement at fair value of our previous 60% stake in Namisa and a gain in the settlement of preexisting relationship of R$621 million as a result of the business combination, as explained in Item 5A “Specific Events Affecting our Results of Operations – Congonhas Minérios” section. Additionally, in 2015 we recorded tax credits of PIS and COFINS in 2011,the amount of R$234 million which we can use to pay future tax obligations. The gains above were partially offset by the increase in impairment of available-for-sale financial assets of R$350 million and increase in provisions for tax, social security, labor, civil and environmental risks in the amount of R$290 million. For more information, see Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements included in “Item 18. Financial Statements”. Equity Result in Results of Affiliated Companies Equity result increased R$829 million, or 250%, from income of R$331 million in 2014 to R$1,160 million in 2015, mainly due to the increase on the result of the jointly-controlled investee Namisa fromR$673 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 to R$1,157 million for the eleven-month period ended November 30, 2015, due to the exchange rate variation over Namisa’s cash,position both proportional to our interest in this subsidiary.
Table of contents The investment in Namisa was accounted for under the equity method until November 30, 2015. In December CSN exchanged a stake in Congonhas Minérios for the 40% stake of the Consortium in Namisa and CSN became the majority shareholder of Namisa; accordingly, Namisa was consolidated as from December 1st, 2015. Details of the transaction between CSN and the Asian Consortium and related conditions precedent for closing are described on Item 4D. Property, Plant and Equipment, Acquisitions and Dispositions. Operating Income Operating income increased R$2,360 million, or 84%, from R$2,818 million in 2014 to R$5,178 million in 2015 due to: ·The gain of R$3,413 million arisen from the business combination of Namisa; and ·an increase of R$829 million in equity result partially offset by; ·a decrease of R$1,002 million in gross profit; and ·and an increase of R$425 million in selling, general and administrative expenses. Financial expenses (income), net Our financial income and expenses generated a net financial expenses of R$3,373 million in 2015 as compared to a net financial expenses of R$3,081 million, an increase of R$292 million in our financial expenses. This increase was mainly due to the depreciation of theReal which generated an increase in foreign exchange losses of R$1,239 million in 2015 in comparison to 2014, partially offset by: (i) a higher gain in our derivatives transactions of R$603 million in 2015 in comparison to 2014 and; (ii) R$135 million greater financial income from short-term investments as a result of the strategy of repatriation of cash previously held in our offshore subsidiaries. Hedge Accounting CSN regularly exports a large portion of its iron ore production, as well as steel products. The revenue in reais from these exports is impacted by the fluctuation of the exchange rate. On the other hand, CSN raises funds in foreign currency through borrowings and financings, in addition to imports of metallurgical coal and coke which are used in its steelmaking process, among other production inputs. These dollar liabilities act as a natural hedge for oscillations in export revenue. In order to better reflect the effect of exchange fluctuations on its financial statements, as of December 31, 2014 CSN began to designate part of its U.S. dollar-denominated liabilities as a hedge for future exports. As a result, the exchange variation arising from these liabilities were temporarily recorded directly in net equity as Other Comprehensive Income totaling to R$1,520 as of December 31, 2015. The said amount is transferred to the income statement when the exports take place, thus allowing impacts from the exchange fluctuation on liabilities and exports to be recorded simultaneously. It is important to note that the adoption of hedge accounting does not involve the contracting of any type of financial instrument.For more information, see Note “11.d) Transactions with Derivative Financial Instruments” in our consolidated financial statements. Income Taxes Income tax expense in Brazil refers to federal income tax and social contribution. The statutory rates for these taxes applicable to the periods presented herein were 25% for federal income tax and 9% for the social contribution. Adjustments are made to the income in order to reach the effective tax expense or benefit in each fiscal year. As a result, our effective tax rate among exercises presents volatility. At the statutory rates the balances owed totaled expenses of R$614 million in 2015 and a benefit of R$90 million in 2014 (34% of income before taxes and adjustments to the income). After adjustments to meet the effective rates, we recorded expenses for income tax and social contribution of R$189 million in 2015, as compared to a benefit of R$151 million in 2014. Expressed as a percentage of pre-tax income,
Table of contents income tax moved from 57% in 2014 to 10% in 2015. For the year ended December 31, 2015, these adjustments totaled a benefit of R$425 million, comprised mainly of: ·a positive R$394 million adjustment related to equity result; ·a benefit of R$829 million related to results of subsidiaries taxed at different rates or not taxed; ·R$632 million positive impact related to the remeasurement at fair value of the 60% stake in Namisa as a result of the business combination of the former joint-controlled entity; ·a negative R$177 million adjustment related to tax loss and negative basis for which the tax credit was not recorded, and ·a negative impact of R$1,143 million related to tax credits not recorded in the year. For further information, see Note 15 to our consolidated financial statements.” It is not possible to predict the future adjustments to the federal income tax and social contribution at statutory rates, as they depend on interest on stockholder’s equity, tax incentives, non-taxable factors including income from offshore operations, and tax losses from offshore operations, especially when expressed as a percentage of income. Net Income (Loss) for the year In 2015, the Company recorded a net profit of R$1,616 million, as compared to a net loss of R$112 million in 2014. Year 2014 Compared to Year 2013 We maintain integrated operations in five business segments: steel, mining, logistics, cement and energy. We manage and control the performance of our various business segments, considering the proportional interest in our jointly controlled entities, Nacional Minérios S.A., MRS Logística S.A., and CBSI - Companhia Brasileira de Serviços de Infraestrutura, reflected on figures described below, which may differ from those accounted according to IFRS. In 2013, the financial statement was substantially impacted by the deconsolidation of Transordestina Logística S.A. which began to be recognized under the equity accounting method, due to the partial spin-off and the entry into effect of the new shareholders’agreement. Our consolidated results for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 by business segment are presented below: R$ million | | | Logistics | | | Year Ended | December | 31, 2014 | Consolidated Results | Steel | Mining | Port Logistics | Railway Logistics | Cement | Energy | Eliminations | Consolidated | Net operating revenues | 11,492 | 4,109 | 202 | 1,105 | 440 | 324 | -1,547 | 16,126 | Domestic Market | 8,650 | 307 | 202 | 1,105 | 440 | 324 | -1,063 | 9,966 | Export Market | 2,841 | 3,803 | | | | | -484 | 6,160 | Cost of goods sold | -8,672 | -2,986 | -138 | -753 | -295 | -187 | 1,439 | -11,592 | Gross profit | 2,820 | 1,123 | 65 | 352 | 145 | 138 | -109 | 4,534 | Adjusted EBITDA* | 2,935 | 1,429 | 68 | 407 | 116 | 135 | -361 | 4,729 | R$ million | | | Logistics | | | Year Ended December 31, 2013 | Consolidated Results | Steel | Mining | Port Logistics | Railway Logistics | Cement | Energy | Eliminations | Consolidated | Net operating revenues | 12,393 | 5,297 | 195 | 1,074 | 416 | 212 | -2,274 | 17,312 | Domestic Market | 9,696 | 680 | 195 | 1,074 | 416 | 212 | -1,025 | 11,247 | Export Market | 2,697 | 4,617 | | | | | -1,249 | 6,065 | Cost of goods sold | -9,962 | -2,829 | -97 | -708 | -277 | -161 | 1,612 | -12,423 | Gross profit | 2,431 | 2,468 | 97 | 366 | 139 | 50 | -662 | 4,890 | Adjusted EBITDA* | 2,454 | 2,618 | 82 | 406 | 101 | 47 | -304 | 5,404 |
*For more information on Adjusted EBITDA see “Results of Operations—Adjusted EBITDA.”
Table of contents Net Operating Revenues Net operating revenues decreased R$1,186 million, or 7%, from R$17,312 million recorded in 2013 to R$16,126 million in 2014, due to a decrease in revenues from our steel and mining segments. Net domestic revenues decreased 11%, from R$11,247 million in 2013 to R$9,966 million in 2014, while total of exports and sales abroad increased 2%, from R$6,065 million in 2013 to R$6,160 million in 2014. Steel Steel net operating revenues decreased R$902 million, or 7%, from R$12,393 million in 2013 to R$11,492 million in 2014, due to a decrease in sales volume of 15% from 6,117 thousand tons in 2013 to 5,177 thousand tons in 2014, partially offset by an increase of 10% in our average steel prices Steel net domestic revenues decreased R$1,045 million, or 11%, from R$9,696 million in 2013 to R$8,650 million in 2014, due to a decrease of 20% in sales volume from 4,650 thousand tons in 2013 to 3,718 thousand tons in 2014, mainly due to a reduction in domestic flat steel sales, impacted by the 3.2% downturn in industrial activity, as apparent steel consumption has a direct correlation with the GDP growth. This decrease in sales volume was partially offset by an increase of 11% in average domestic steel prices, driven principally by the real depreciation, which causes steel imports to become relatively more expensive. Steel net revenues from exports and its production costssales abroad increased R$144 million, or 5%, from R$2,697 million in 2013 to R$2,841 million in 2014, due to an increase of 7% in the average steel prices to the foreign market given the real depreciation, which results in more favorable conditions to compete abroad, as our foreign prices are sensitive to international prices and the consolidationexchange rate. Our sales volume to the foreign markets remained stable in 2014 at 1,460 thousand tons when compared to 2013.Logistics Logistics net operating revenues increased R$38 million, or 3%, from R$1,269 million reported in 2013 to R$1,307 million in 2014. In 2014, net revenue from railway logistics totaled R$1,105 million and net revenue from port logistics amounted to R$202 million, while in 2013, net revenue from railway logistics totaled R$1,074 million and net revenue from port logistics amounted to R$195 million. Our net revenue from logistic services to third parties was R$ 1,015 million, or 78% of SWT’s resultstotal net revenue from logistic services, in 2014 and R$1,000 million, or 79%, in 2013. Mining Total mining net operating revenues decreased R$1,188 million, or 22%, from R$5,297 million in 2013 to R$4,109 million in 2014, mainly due to: ·A decrease of 28% in average international iron ore prices, from US$135/dmt in 2013 to US$97/dmt in 2014, principally due to a substantial upturn in exports by the main Australian mining companies coupled with a resilience of the high-cost Chinese producers, along with the downturn in investments in the China’s real estate setor due to the gradual slowdown of the economy. ·The decrease in iron ore prices was partially offset by an increase of 17% in our iron ore sales, from 21.5 million tons in 2013 to 25.2 million tons in 2014. This volume increase came mainly from Casa de Pedra mine, which sales increased 29%, from 15.3 million tons in 2013 to 19.8 million tons in 2014, given the expansion of its iron ore production, which increased 40%, from 15.4 million tons in 2013 to 21.6 million tons in 2014, due to the ramp up of this mine. Mining net export revenues decreased R$814 million, or 17%, from R$4,617 million in 2013 to R$3,803 million in 2014, mainly due to the decrease of 28% in average international iron ore prices, partially offset by an increase of 17% in our iron ore exports, from 21.4 million tons in 2013 to 25.1 million tons in 2014, mainly from Casa de Pedra, as aforementioned. Mining net domestic revenues decreased R$373 million, or 59%, from R$680 million in 2013 to R$307 million in 2014, due to the decrease in iron ore prices and a reduction in domestic sales, from 157 thousand tons in 2013 to 138 thousand tons in 2014.
Table of February 2012.contents Cement Cement net revenue increased R$25 million, or 6%, from R$416 million in 2013 to R$440 million in 2014, mainly due to an increase of 7% in cement sales volume from 2,046 thousand tons in 2013 to 2,185 thousand tons in 2014, with the ramp up of our cement grinding plant in Volta Redonda. Energy Our net operating revenues from the energy segment increased R$113 million, or 53% of total net revenue from the energy segment, from R$212 million in 2013 to R$324 million in 2014, mainly due to the sale of surplus energy on the market. Our net revenue from energy sales to third parties were R$ 172 million, or 53%, in 2014 and R$62 million, or 29%, in 2013. Cost of Products Sold Consolidated cost of products sold decreased R$830 million, or 7% from $12,423 million in 2013 to R$11,592 million in 2014, mainly given a decrease in cost of products sold from our steel segment. Steel Consolidated steel costs of products sold were R$8,672 million in 2014, representing a 13% decrease as compared to the R$9,962 million recorded in 2013, mainly due to the decrease in steel sales volume. Other than the periodic sale of excess inventories and the purchase by our subsidiaries of semi-finished products from third parties for further processing, our cost of products sold is comparable to our flat steel production cost. The following table sets forth our flat steel production costs, the production costs per ton of steel and the portion of production costs attributable to the primary components of our costs of production. With the exception of coal and coke, which we import, and some metals (such as aluminum, zinc and tin) with domestic prices linked to international prices, our production costs of production are mostly denominated inreais. | 2012 | 2011 | | Steel Production Cost | | 2014 | 2013 | Variation | | R$ million | R$ / ton | R$ million | R$ / ton | R$ million | R$ / ton | Raw Materials | R$ million | R$ / ton | % | R$ million | R$ / ton | % | 3,390 | 701.6 | 3,702 | 736.2 | -312 | -34.6 | Iron Ore | 280 | 56.7 | 4.3% | 283 | 56.6 | 4.7% | 422 | 87.3 | 372 | 74.1 | 50 | 13.2 | Coal | 1,244 | 252.0 | 19.1% | 1,249 | 250.5 | 20.9% | 748 | 154.8 | 800 | 159.1 | -52 | -4.3 | Coke | 672 | 136.1 | 10.3% | 575 | 115.3 | 9.6% | 694 | 143.6 | 772 | 153.5 | -78 | -9.9 | Metals | 258 | 52.2 | 4.0% | 275 | 55.1 | 4.6% | 335 | 69.4 | 310 | 61.6 | 25 | 7.8 | Outsourced Slabs and Hot Coils | 144 | 29.2 | 2.2% | 221 | 44.3 | 3.7% | | Outsourced Slabs | | 467 | 96.7 | 678 | 134.9 | -211 | -38.2 | Pellets | 366 | 74.1 | 5.6% | 276 | 55.3 | 4.6% | 399 | 82.6 | 400 | 79.5 | -1 | 3.1 | Scrap | 131 | 26.5 | 2.0% | 110 | 22.0 | 1.8% | 74 | 15.3 | 114 | 22.6 | -40 | -7.3 | Other(1) | 242 | 49.0 | 3.7% | 237 | 47.5 | 4.0% | 251 | 51.9 | 256 | 50.9 | -5 | 1 | (1)Includes limestone and dolomite | | | | | | Labor | | 706 | 146.1 | 639 | 127.2 | 67 | 18.9 | Other Production Costs | | 2,359 | 488.2 | 2,621 | 521.5 | -262 | -33.3 | Energy / Fuel | 567 | 114.8 | 8.7% | 565 | 113.3 | 9.5% | 495 | 102.4 | 623 | 123.9 | -128 | -21.5 | Labor | 634 | 128.5 | 9.7% | 607 | 121.6 | 10.2% | | Services and Maintenance | 911 | 184.5 | 14.0% | 716 | 143.5 | 12.0% | 910 | 188.3 | 911 | 181.2 | -1 | 7.1 | Tools and Supplies | 274 | 55.6 | 4.2% | 268 | 53.8 | 4.5% | 260 | 53.9 | 294 | 58.4 | -34 | -4.5 | Depreciation | 688 | 139.3 | 10.5% | 562 | 112.7 | 9.4% | | Depreciation(2) | | 575 | 119.1 | 652 | 129.8 | -77 | -10.7 | Other | 116 | 23.5 | 1.8% | 27 | 5.5 | 0.5% | 119 | 24.5 | 141 | 28.2 | -22 | -3.7 | Total Steel Cost Production | 6,527 | 1,321.8 | 100.0% | 5,970 | 1,197.1 | 100.0% | | Total | | 6,455 | 1,336 | 6,962 | 1,385 | -507 | -49 |
(1)Includes limestone and dolomite (2) The decrease of the depreciation in 2014 refers mainly to the revision of the useful lives of the assets perfomance.
Table Of Contentsof contents In 2012, our steel production costs were R$6,527 million, a 9.3%, or R$557 million, increase from the R$5,970 million reported in 2011.
We are self-sufficient in almost all the raw materials used in the production of steel. The principal raw materials we use in our integrated steel mill include iron ore, coke, coal (from which we produce most of our coke necessities), limestone, dolomite, aluminum, tin and zinc. In addition, our production operations consume water, gases, electricity and ancillary materials. We obtain all of our iron ore requirements except pellets from our Casa de Pedra mine located in the state of Minas Gerais, and the limestone and dolomite from our Bocaina mine in the city of Arcos, in the state of Minas Gerais. The coal and coke we consume are acquired from different international producers “See Item 4B - 4B—Raw Materials and Suppliers”.Suppliers.” Our steel production costs decreased R$507 million, or 7%, from R$6,962 million in 2013 to R$6,455 million in 2014, mainly due to the reduction in costs with raw materials, mainly due to lower costs with slabs purchased from third parties and lower costs with coke and coal. Our costs regarding purchase of outsourced slabs from third parties decreased R$211 million, or 31%, from R$678 million in 2013 to R$467 million in 2014, due to lower consumption of slabs purchased from third parties given the lower production of rolled products. Our coke costs increaseddecreased R$9778 million, or 16.9%10%, from R$575772 million in 20112013 to R$672694 million in 2012,2014, corresponding to 10.3%11% of our steel production cost, mainly due to the increaselower international coke prices and a decrease of 5% in consumption, andpartially offset by the depreciation of the Brazilianreal. real. TheOur coal costs of pellets increaseddecreased R$9052 million, or 32.6%7%, from R$276800 million in 20112013 to R$366748 million in 2012, principally due2014, corresponding to the increase in consumption.
Our costs12% of services and maintenance increased 27.2% or R$195 million, from R$716 million in 2011 to R$ 911 million in 2012,our steel production cost, mainly due to preventive maintenance. lower international coal prices, partially offset by an increase of 2% in consumption and by the depreciation of the real.
DepreciationOur scrap costs increaseddecreased R$12640 million, or 22.4%35%, from R$562114 million in 20112013 to R$68874 million in 2012,2014, mainly due to asset additions.lower consumption.
Other production costs regarding energy/fuel decreased R$128 million or 21%, from R$623 million in 2013 to R$495 million in 2014. Mining Our mining costs of products sold totaledincreased R$2,450157 million, or 6%, from R$2,829 million in 2012, an increase of2013 to R$2652,986 million or 12.1%, as comparedin 2014, mainly due to the R$2,185 million reported in 2011, mainly as a result of the increase in volume of iron ore sold. The unit cost per ton in 2014 decreased 10%, from R$131 in 2013 to R$118 in 2014 due to a dilution of fixed costs, given the higher production costs.and sales volume. Logistics In 2012, costCost of services attributable to our logistics segment totaledincreased R$81285 million, representing a 7.9% increase as comparedor 11%, from R$806 million in 2013 to R$891 million in 2014, due to the increases of R$75245 million reportedand R$40 million in 2011,the costs of railway logistics and port logistic services, respectively. For railway logistics the increase of R$45 million was mainly due to an increase in costs from MRS. For port logistics services, the increase inof R$ 40 million was the costhigher volume of railway logistics, which totaled R$730 million in 2012, a 9.4% increase (equivalent to R$63 million) fromsteel products transported during the R$667 million reported in 2011. The railway logistics represented 89.9% of the total logistics costs in 2012 and 88.7% of the total logistics costs in 2011. In addition, cost of services from port logistics totaled R$82 million, a 3.5% decrease from the R$85 million reported in 2011.period.
Table Of Contents
Cement Cost of products sold attributable to our cement segment reachedincreased R$286 million in 2012, R$1819 million, or 6.7% up7%, from the R$268277 million reported in 2011,2013 to R$295 million in 2014, mainly due to the increase in sales volume. The unit cost per ton was R$135, remained stable in 2013 and 2014.
Table of contents Energy In 2012, costCost of products sold attributable to our energy segment wasincreased R$15325 million, an increase ofor 16%, from R$48161 million as compared with thein 2013 to R$105187 million reported in 2011.2014.
Gross Profit Gross profit totaleddecreased R$4,824355 million, or 7%, from R$4,889 million in 2012, a decrease of 28.2% or R$1,895 million as compared2013 to R$6,7194,534 million in 2011,2014, due to the increasedecrease of R$2,2711,186 million in net revenues partially offset by the decrease of R$830 million in cost of products sold, partially offset by the increase of R$376 million in net revenues.as discussed above. Steel Gross profit in the steel segment totaledincreased R$1,934389 million, or 16%, from R$2,431 million in 2012, a decrease of2013 to R$506 million, or 20.7%, from R$2,4402,820 million in 2011, due to the increase of R$1,830 million in the cost of steel products sold, partially offset by the increase of R$1,324 million in steel net revenues, as discussed above. 2014. Mining Our gross profit in the mining segment decreased R$1,6361,344 million, or 44.5%55% from R$3,6712,467 million in 20112013 to R$2,0351,123 million in 2012, due to the decrease of R$1,371 million in mining net operating revenues and the increase of R$265 million in cost of products sold.2014. Logistics Gross profit in the logistics segment decreased 1.7%R$47 million, or 10%, from R$413463 million in 20112013 to R$406416 million in 2012, due to the increase of R$60 million in cost of products sold, partially offset by the increase of R$52 million in net revenues.2014. Cement Gross profit in the cement segment increased R$376 million, or 56.9%4.6% from R$65139 million in 20112013 to R$102145 million in 2012, due to the increase of R$55 million in net revenues, partially offset by the R$18 million increase in the cost of products sold.2014. Energy TheGross profit in energy segment reported in 2012 a gross profit ofincreased R$76 million, a decrease of R$2.088 million, or 3.0% as compared with the173%, from R$7850 million reported in 2011.2013 to R$138 million in 2014.
Selling, Generalgeneral and Administrative Expensesadministrative In 2012, we recorded selling,Selling, general and administrative expenses ofincreased R$1,508120 million, a 27.8% increaseor 9%, from 2011.R$1,360 million in 2013 to R$1,480 million in 2014. Selling expenses increased 54.3%R$167 million, or 19%, from R$604875 million in 20112013 to R$9321,042 million in 2012,2014, mainly due to thean increase in the portion of our iron ore sold withCIF sales (sales including insurance and freight included (CIF) and becausecosts), driven by our strategy of the inclusion of SWT’s operations in our consolidated results as of February 2012. Generaladding value to cargoes destined to Asian markets, while general and administrative expenses remained largely unchanged, atdecreased R$57747 million, or 10%, from R$485 million in 2012.2013 to R$438 million in 2014.
Other operating income (expenses) In 2012,2014, we recorded a net expense of R$2,673567 million in the “Other Revenue and Expenses” line-item, as compareditem, mainly due to a net incomethe negative impact of R$218205 million in 2011. The R$2,891 million variation was mostly due to:
Table Of Contents
• The impairment of the investment in Usiminas’ shares and consequentlyregarding the reclassification of the accumulatedaccrued losses from investments in shares recorded in shareholders’ equity in the amount of R$2,023 million to otheras available for sale.
In 2013 net operating expenses (income statement); and • A positiveof R$568 million were mainly due to a negative impact of R$698254 million regarding provision for tax, social security, labor, civil and environmental risks, R$233 million regarding REFIS program and R$216 million regarding an impairment due to the spin-off of TLSA which were partially offset by a R$474 million gain on share of control of TLSA. For more information see Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements included in “Item 18. Financial Statements”.
Table of contents Equity Result in Results of Affiliated Companies Equity result increased R$173 million, or 109%, from incomeof R$158 million in 2011 from2013 to R$331 million in 2014, mainly due to the saleincrease on the result of CSN’s entirethe jointly-controlled investee Namisa of R$133 million in 2013 and R$291 million in 2014, both proportional to our interest in Riversdale Mining Limitedthis subsidiary. The investment in April 2011.Namisa is currently accounted under the equity method. After the closing of the transaction between CSN and the Asian Consortium, as announced on December 12, 2014, the accounting impact will be revised based on the final terms of control of the agreement. Details of the transaction between CSN and the Asian Consortium and related conditions precedent for closing are described on Item 4D. Property, Plant and Equipment, Acquisitions and Dispositions. Operating Income Operating income totaleddecreased R$642302 million, or 10%, from R$3,120 million in 2013 to R$2,818 million in 2014 due to: ·a decrease of 88.8%, or R$5,115 million, from R$5,757 million in 2011. This decrease was mainlydue to: • A reduction of R$1,895355 million in gross profit;
• The R$2,023 million reclassification of our investments in Usiminas, as discussed above;
• The positive impact of R$698 million in the first nine months of 2011 from the sale of CSN’s entire interest in Riversdale Mining Limited;
• Anprofit and an increase of R$328120 million in selling, general and administrative expenses, partially offset by;
expenses·, aforementioned.an increase of R$173 million in equity result.
Financial expenses (income), net In 2012,2014, our net financial expenses decreased by 0.7%increased R$570 million, or R$14 million,23%, from R$2,0062,512 million in 20112013 to RS$1,992R$3,081 million in 2012,2014, mainly due to: ·an increase in interest expenses of R$364 million, or 13%, from R$2,740 million in 2013 to R$3,104 million in 2014, mainly due to the following items:increase of R$549 million in financial expenses regarding borrowings and financing, due to an increase in gross debt. This increase was partially offset by a reduction of R$225 million from 2013 to 2014 due to a negative effect of R$277 million in 2013 regarding interest related to our adherence to the REFIS program.
· Interest income decreased by 41.9%, ora variation of R$301205 million regarding monetary and exchange variations, from a revenue of R$71756 million in 20112013 to a loss of R$416149 million in 2012 due to a reduction of R$301 million in returns on financial investments; ·Interest expense decreased by 10.0%, or R$289 million, from R$2,884 million in 2011 to R$2,595 million in 20122014, mainly due to the decreaseeffect of R$48 million in interest on loans and financing, the decrease13% average depreciation of R$105 million in themonetary restatement of tax payment installments and expenses of R$77 million in 2011 relating to the Federal Tax Repayment Program, or REFISReal against the U.S. dollar..
Income Taxes We recorded a gain for income tax and social contribution of R$870 million in 2012, as compared to an expense of R$84 million in 2011. Expressed as a percentage of pre-tax income, income tax moved from 2.2% in 2011 to -64.4% in 2012. Income tax expense in Brazil refers to federal income tax and social contribution tax. The statutory rates for these taxes applicable to the periods presented herein were 25% for federal income tax and 9% for the social contribution. Therefore,Adjustments are made to the income in order to reach the effective tax expense or benefit in each fiscal year. As a result, our effective tax rate among exercises presents volatility.
The balances owed for these periods totaled a gainbenefit of R$45990 million in 20122014 and an expense of R$1,275207 million in 20112013 (34% of income before taxes and equityadjustments to the income). After adjustments we recorded a benefit for income tax and social contribution of R$151 million in affiliated companies). Adjustments are made2014, as compared to an expense of R$ 74million in 2013. Expressed as a percentage of pre-tax income, income tax moved from 12% in 2013 to 57% in 2014. For the year ended December 31, 2014, these rates in order to reach the actual tax expense for the years.adjustments totaled a benefit of R$61 million, comprised mainly of: For the year ended December 31, 2012,2014, adjustments totaled a benefit of R$41161 million, comprised mainly of: ·a positive R$113 million adjustment related to equity result; ·a negative R$29 million adjustment related to tax loss and werenegative basis without deferred tax. For the year ended December 31, 2013, adjustments totaled an expense of R$133 million, comprised mainly of: · a positive R$386550 million adjustment related to equity incometax credits from subsidiaries, which increased tax gains;
Table of subsidiaries at different rates or which are not taxable,contents ·a positive R$255 million adjustment related to interest on capital benefit, which increased tax gains; · a positive R$39173 million adjustment related to non taxable income from the REFISsubject to special tax rates or untaxed, which increased tax gains; · a negative R$43689 million adjustment related to the REFIS which increased tax expenses; ·a negative R$167 million adjustment related to tax loss and negative basis without constituted deferred tax, which decreased tax gains; and ·a R$26 million effect related to other permanent additions, which increased tax gains.
For the year ended December 31, 2011, adjustments totaled R$1,190 million and were comprised of:
Table Of Contents
·a R$1,279 million adjustment related to equity income of subsidiaries at different rates or which are not taxable, which decreased tax expenses;
·tax incentives that represented a net tax adjustment of R$73 million, which decreased tax expenses;
·tax incentives of R$44 million, which decreased tax expenses;
·a R$16 million adjustment related to non taxable income from the REFIS which increased tax expenses; and
·An adjustment of R$190 million related to the sale of non-deductible securities, which increased tax expenses.
It is not possible to predict the future adjustments to the federal income tax and social contribution at statutory rates, as they depend on interest on stockholder’s equity, tax incentives, non-taxable factors including income from offshore operations, and tax losses from offshore operations, especially when expressed as a percentage of income. Net Income (Loss) for the year In 2012, we had2014, the Company recorded a net loss of R$481112 million, as compared to a net income of R$3,667534 million in 2011, basically due to the impairment of the investment in Usiminas’ shares, which had an impact of R$1,335 million on the income statement. 2013 Year 2011 Compared to Year 2010
Our consolidated results for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 by business segment are presented below:
| | | Logistics | | | | Year Ended December 31, 2011 | | | | | | | | | | Net operating revenues | 9,478 | 5,856 | 143 | 1,023 | 333 | 183 | (496) | 16,520 | Domestic Market | 8,190 | 834 | 143 | 1,023 | 333 | 183 | (565) | 10,142 | Export Market | 1,287 | 5,022 | | | | | 69 | 6,378 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Logistics | | | | Year Ended December 31, 2010 | | | | | | | | | | Net operating revenues | 9,926 | 3,615 | 119 | 838 | 202 | 114 | (364) | 14,451 | Domestic Market | 8,763 | 574 | 119 | 838 | 202 | 114 | (364) | 10,247 | Export Market | 1,163 | 3,041 | | | | | | 4,204 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
For more information on Adjusted EBITDA see “Results of Operations – Adjusted EBITDA”.
Net Operating Revenues
Net operating revenues were R$16,520 million in 2011, an increase of R$2,069 million, or 14.3%, from R$14,451 million recorded in 2010, mainly due to the increase in our mining revenues, which represent 35% of our total revenues.
Table Of Contents
Total net revenues of exports and sales abroad increased 51.7%, from R$4,204 million in 2010 to R$6,378 million in 2011, while net domestic revenues decreased 1.0%, from R$10,247 million in 2010 to R$10,142 million in 2011.
Steel
Steel net operating revenues decreased R$448 million, or 4.5%, from R$9,926 million in 2010 to R$9,478 million in 2011, mainly due to a decrease in average steel prices, partially offset by the 2.1% increase in sales volume from 4,796 thousand tons in 2010 to 4,896 thousand tons in 2011.
Steel net domestic revenues decreased 6.5%, from R$8,763 million in 2010 to R$8,190 million in 2011, mainly due to a decrease in average steel prices in the domestic market, partially offset by the 1.9% increase in sales volume from 4,135 thousand tons in 2010 to 4,216 thousand tons in 2011.
Steel net revenues from exports and sales abroad increased 10.7%, from R$1,163 million in 2010 to R$1,287 million in 2011, with increases in average steel prices in the international market as well as an increase in sales volumes, from 661 thousand tons in 2010 to 680 thousand tons in 2011.
Mining
Mining net operating revenues increased R$2,241 million, or 62.0%, from R$3,615 million in 2010 to R$5,856 million in 2011, primarily due to higher international prices and the increase in sales volume.
Mining net domestic revenues increased R$260 million, or 45.3%, from R$574 million in 2010 to R$834 million in 2011, mainly due to the increase in average iron ore prices, partially offset by the decrease of 4.1% in sales volume from 1,520 thousand tons in 2010 to 1,457 thousand tons in 2011, a function of our strategy of increasing iron ore exports.
Mining net export revenues increased R$1,981 million, or 65.1%, from R$3,041 million in 2010 to R$5,022 million in 2011, primarily due to the increase in international iron ore prices driven by the strong demand, mainly from China, and the increase of 31.4% in sales volume, from 17,035 thousand tons in 2010 to 22,392 thousand tons in 2011.
Logistics
Logistics net operating revenues in 2011 were R$1,166 million, an increase of 21.8% as compared with the net logistics operating revenues of R$957 million reported in 2010. In 2011, net revenue from railway logistics totaled R$1,023 million and net revenue from port logistics amounted to R$143 million, while in 2010, net revenue from railway logistics totaled R$838 million and net revenue from port logistics amounted to R$119 million.
Cement
As we continue the ramp-up of our cement plant in Volta Redonda, we significantly increased sales in 2011, reaching 1,755 thousand tons, which represents a growth of 76.9% when compared to 2010.
As a consequence, in 2011, net revenues from the cement segment totaled R$333 million, an increase of 65.0% from 2010 net revenues of R$202 million.
Energy
In 2011 our net operating revenues from the energy segment totaled R$183 million, an increase of R$69 million as compared with net operating revenues of R$114 million reported in 2010 in this segment.
Cost of Products Sold
In 2011, consolidated cost of products sold amounted to R$9,801 million, representing a 24.3% increase as compared to R$7,883 million recorded in 2010.
Table Of Contents
Steel
Consolidated steel costs were R$7,038 million in 2011, representing a 13.0% increase as compared to the R$6,226 million recorded in 2010, mainly due to the increase in raw materials costs.
Other than the periodic sale of excess inventories and the purchase by our subsidiaries of semi-finished products from third parties for further processing, our cost of products sold is equivalent to our steel production cost.
The following table sets forth our steel production costs, the production costs per ton of steel and the portion of production costs attributable to the primary components of our costs of production. With the exception of coal and coke, which we import, and some metals (such as aluminum, zinc and tin) with domestic prices linked to international prices, our costs of production are mostly denominated inreais.
| 2011 | 2010 | Raw Materials | R$ million | R$ / ton | % | R$ million | R$ / ton | % | Iron Ore | 283 | 56.6 | 4.7% | 239 | 47.0 | 4.3% | Coal | 1,249 | 250.5 | 20.9% | 1,239 | 243.7 | 22.1% | Coke | 575 | 115.3 | 9.6% | 382 | 75.1 | 6.8% | Metals | 275 | 55.1 | 4.6% | 244 | 48.0 | 4.3% | Outsourced Slabs and Hot Coils | 221 | 44.3 | 3.7% | 272 | 53.5 | 4.9% | Pellets | 276 | 55.3 | 4.6% | 169 | 33.2 | 3.0% | Scrap | 110 | 22.0 | 1.8% | 64 | 12.6 | 1.1% | Other(1) | 237 | 47.5 | 4.0% | 274 | 53.9 | 4.9% | (1)Includes limestone and dolomite | | | | | | | Energy / Fuel | 565 | 113.3 | 9.5% | 561 | 110.3 | 10.1% | Labor | 607 | 121.6 | 10.2% | 570 | 112.1 | 10.2% | Services and Maintenance | 716 | 143.5 | 12.0% | 743 | 146.1 | 13.3% | Tools and Supplies | 268 | 53.8 | 4.5% | 269 | 52.9 | 4.8% | Depreciation | 562 | 112.7 | 9.4% | 489 | 96.2 | 8.7% | Other | 27 | 5.5 | 0.5% | 59 | 16.5 | 1.5% | | | | | | | | Total Steel Cost Production | 5,970 | 1,197.1 | 100.0% | 5,574 | 1,101.3 | 100.0% |
In 2011, our steel production costs were R$5,970 million, a 7.1%, or R$396 million, increase from the R$5,574 million reported in 2010.
We are self-sufficient in almost all the raw materials used in the production of steel. The principal raw materials we use in our integrated steel mill include iron ore, coke, coal (from which we produce most of our coke necessities), limestone, dolomite, aluminum, tin and zinc. In addition, our production operations consume water, gases, electricity and ancillary materials.
We obtain all of our iron ore requirements from our Casa de Pedra mine located in the state of Minas Gerais, and the limestone and dolomite from our Bocaina mine in the city of Arcos, in the state of Minas Gerais.
The coal and coke we consume are acquired from different international producers “See Item 4B - Raw Materials and Suppliers”. In the first half of 2011, given the mismatch between supply and demand, there was an increase in the price of some raw materials used in steelmaking.
Table Of Contents
Our coke costs increased R$193 million or 50.5%, from R$382 million in 2010 to R$575 million in 2011, corresponding to 9.6% of our steel production cost, due to the increase in consumption and higher average prices.
The costs of pellets increased R$107 million or 63%, from R$169 million in 2010 to R$276 million in 2011, principally due to increase in consumption but also due to higher average prices.
Depreciation costs increased R$73 million from R$489 million in 2010 to R$562 million in 2011, mainly due to asset additions.
Mining
Our mining costs of products sold totaled R$2,185 million in 2011, an increase of R$933 million, or 74.5%, as compared to the R$1,252 million reported in 2010, mainly due to the increase in sales volume of iron ore.
Logistics
In 2011, cost of services attributable to our logistics segment totaled R$752 million, representing a 27.0% increase as compared to the R$592 million reported in 2010, mainly due to the increase in the cost of railway logistics, which totaled R$667 million in 2011, a 27.8% increase (equivalent to R$145 million) from the R$522 million reported in 2010. The railway logistics represented 89% of the total logistics costs in 2011 and 88% of the total logistics costs in 2010. In addition, cost of services from port logistics totaled R$85 million, a 21.4% increase from the R$70 million reported in 2010.
Cement
Cost of products sold attributable to our cement segment reached R$268 million in 2011, R$104 million, or 63.4% up from the R$164 million reported in 2010, mainly due to an increase in sales, as described above.
Energy
In 2011, cost of products sold attributable to our energy segment was R$105 million, an increase of R$63 million or 150.0% as compared with the R$42 million reported in 2010.
Gross Profit
Gross profit totaled R$6,719 million in 2011, an increase of 2.3% or R$151 million as compared to R$6,568 million in 2010, due to the increase of R$2,069 million in net operating revenues, partially offset by the increase of R$1,918 million in cost of products sold.
Steel
Gross profit in the steel segment totaled R$2,440 million in 2011, a decrease of R$1,260 million, or 34.1%, from R$3,700 million in 2010, due to the increase of R$812 million in the cost of steel products sold, in light of the increase in raw material costs, and the decrease of R$448 million in steel net revenues due to the decrease in average steel prices.
Mining
Our gross profit in the mining segment increased R$1,308 million, or 55.3% from R$2,363 million in 2010 to R$3,671 million in 2011, mainly due to the increase of R$2,241 million in mining net operating revenues, caused by higher international prices and increase in sales volume, partially offset by the increase of R$933 million in cost of products sold.
Logistics
Gross profit in the logistics segment increased 12.8% from R$366 million in 2010 to R$413 million in 2011, due to the increase of R$209 million in net revenues, partially offset by the increase of R$160 million in the cost of products sold.
Table Of Contents
Cement
Gross profit in the cement segment increased R$27 million or 68.4% from R$38 million in 2010 to R$65 million in 2011, due to the increase of R$131 million in net revenues, partially offset by the R$104 million increase in the cost of products sold.
Energy
The energy segment reported in 2011 a gross profit of R$78 million, an increase of 8.3% as compared with the R$72 million reported in 2010.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
In 2011, we recorded selling, general and administrative expenses of R$1,180 million, a 15.8% increase from 2010. Selling expenses increased 25.3%, from R$482 million in 2010 to R$604 million in 2011, mainly due to expenses relating to iron ore freight. General and administrative expenses increased 7.3%, from R$537 million in 2010 to R$576 million in 2011.
Other operating income (Expenses)
In 2011, we recorded a net income of R$218 million in the “Other Revenue and Expenses” line-item, as compared to a net expense of R$551 million in 2010. The R$769 million increase was mostly due to the R$698 million from the sale of CSN’s entire interest in Riversdale Mining Limited in April 2011.
Operating Income
Operating income increased by 15.2%, or R$759 million, from R$4,998 million in 2010 to R$5,757 million in 2011. This increase was mainlydue to the R$698 million from the sale of CSN’s entire interest in Riversdale Mining Limited in April 2011.
Financial expenses (income), net
In 2011, our net financial expenses increased by 5.0% or R$95 million, from R$1,911 million in 2010 to RS$2,006 million in 2011, mainly due to the following items:
·Interest income increased by 11.5%, or R$74 million, from R$643 million in 2010 to R$717 million in 2011 mainly due to the increase of R$145 million in returns on financial investments, due to the increases in cash and cash equivalents. This decrease was partially offset by the decrease of R$46 million in other financial income;
·Interest expense increased by 31.1%, or R$684 million, from R$2,200 million in 2010 to R$2,884 million in 2011 mainly due to the increase of R$828 million in interests on loans and financing, partially offset by an increase of R$138 million in capitalized interest;
·Foreign exchange and monetary variation net, including operations with derivatives, moved from a loss of R$354 million in 2010 to a gain of R$161 million in 2011, mainly resulting from the depreciation of thereal against the U.S. dollar. This depreciation affects:
oOur U.S. dollar-denominated gross debt;
oOur U.S. dollar-denominated cash and cash equivalents; and
oOur trade accounts receivable and payable account receivables.
Income Taxes
We recorded an expense for income tax and social contribution of R$84 million in 2011, as compared to R$571 million in 2010. Expressed as a percentage of pre-tax income, income tax expense decreased from 18.5% in2010 to 2.2% in 2011. Income tax expense in Brazil refers to federal income tax and social contribution tax. The statutory rates for these taxes applicable to the periods presented herein were 25% for federal income tax and 9% for the social contribution. Therefore, the balances owed for these periods totaled R$1,275 million in 2011 and R$1,050 million in 2010 (34% of income before taxes and equity in affiliated companies). Adjustments are made to these rates in order to reach the actual tax expense for the years.
Table Of Contents
For the year ended December 31, 2011, adjustments totaled R$1,190 million and were comprised of:
·a R$1,279 million adjustment related to equity income of subsidiaries at different rates or which are not taxable, which decreased tax expenses;
·tax incentives that represented a net tax adjustment of R$73 million, which decreased tax expenses;
·tax incentives of R$44 million, which decreased tax expenses;
·a R$16 million adjustment related to non taxable income from REFIS which increased tax expenses; and
·An adjustment of R$190 million related to sale of non-deductible securities, which increased tax expenses.
For the year ended December 31, 2010, adjustments totaled R$478 million and were comprised of:
·a R$121 million benefit from interest on shareholders’ equity;
·a R$217 million adjustment related to equity income of subsidiaries at different rates or which are not taxable, which decreased tax expenses;
·tax incentives that represented a net tax adjustment of R$34 million, which decreased tax expenses; and
·a R$106 million benefit related to non taxable income from REFIS adjustments.
It is not possible to predict the future adjustments to the federal income tax and social contribution at statutory rates, as they depend on interest on stockholder’s equity, tax incentives, non-taxable factors including income from offshore operations, and tax losses from offshore operations, especially when expressed as a percentage of income.
Net Income
In 2011, we had a net income of R$3,667 million, a 45.7% increase as compared to 2010. The improved results were mainly due to the R$698 million from the sale of CSN’s entire interest in Riversdale Mining Limited in April 2011.
Adjusted EBITDA The Company uses adjusted EBITDA to measure the performance of its various segments and the capacity to generate recurring operating cash. It comprises net income before the net financial result, income and social contribution taxes, depreciation and amortization, equity incomeshare of profit (losses) of investees, proportional EBITDA of jointly controlled companies and other operating revenueincome (expenses). However, although it is used to measure segment results, adjusted EBITDA is not a measure recognized by Brazilian accounting practices or International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), has no standard definition and therefore should not be compared to similar indicators adopted by other companies. As required by IFRS 8, the table below shows the reconciliation of the adjusted EBITDA with the net income (loss) for the year.
Table Of Contents
R$ Million | | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | Profit/(Loss) for the year | | (481) | | 3,667 | | 2,516 | 1,616 | -112 | 534 | Depreciation | | 1,216 | | 929 | | 806 | | Depreciation and amortization | | 1136 | 1245 | 1094 | Income tax and social contribution | | (870) | | 84 | | 571 | 189 | -151 | 74 | Finance income | | 1,992 | | 2,006 | | 1,911 | | Net financial result | | 3373 | 3081 | 2512 | EBITDA | | 1,858 | | 6,686 | | 5,804 | 6,313 | 4,063 | 4,214 | Other operating income (expenses) | | 2,673 | | (218) | | 551 | -2392 | 567 | 568 | Share of profit (losses) of investees | | 1 | | - | | - | -1,160 | -331 | -158 | Proportional EBITDA of Jointly Controlled Investees¹ | | 490 | 430 | 781 | Adjusted EBITDA | | 4,532 | | 6,468 | | 6,355 | 3,251 | 4,729 | 5,404 |
¹Adjusted EBITDA is calculated based on net income/loss, before depreciation and amortization, income taxes, the net financial result, results from investees, and other operating income (expenses) and includes the proportional share of the EBITDA of the jointly-owned investees MRS Logística and CBSI, as well as the Company’s 60% stake in Namisa until November 2015 and 100% stake in Congonhas Minérios as of December 2015. Adjusted EBITDA totaleddecreased R$4,5321,478 million, or 31%, from R$4,729 million in 2012, a decrease of 29.9% or R$1,936 million as compared2014 to R$6,4683,251 million in 2011,2015, due to the decrease in salesthe steel and average prices of iron ore and higher costs of goods sold.mining EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA totaleddecreased R$6,468675 million, or 12%, from R$5,404 million in 2011, an increase of 1.8% or R$113 million as compared2013 to R$6,3554,729 million in 2010,2014, due to the increasedecrease in sales and average prices of iron ore, partially offset by higher costs of goods sold and lower steel prices.revenue from mining operations. 5B. Liquidity and Capital Resources Overview
Table of contents Our main uses of funds are for capital expenditures and repayment of debt and dividend payments.debt. We have historically met these requirements by using cash generated from operating activities and through the issuance of short-short and long-term debt instruments. We expect to meet our cash needs for 20132016 primarily through a combination of operating cash flow, cash and cash equivalents on hand, cash from asset sales and newly issued long-term debt instruments.instruments in order to repay the portion of our total debt maturing in 2016. In addition, from time to time, we periodically review acquisition and investment opportunities and will make, if a suitable opportunity arises, make selected acquisitions and investments to implement our business strategy. We generally make investments directly or through subsidiaries, joint venturesjointly controlled entities or affiliated companies, and fund these investments through internally generated funds, the issuance of debt, or a combination of such methods. Sources of Funds and Working Capital Year 20122015 Compared to Year 20112014 Cash Flows Cash and cash equivalents decreased by R$973825 million in 2012,2015, compared to an increasea decrease of R$5,1781,310 million in 2011.2014. Operating Activities Cash provided by operations was R$3,4885,069 million and R$4,202824 million in 20122015 and 2011,2014, respectively. ThisThe R$7144,245 million decreaseincrease was mainly due to the Namisa’s dividend receipt, amounting R$3,545 million, part of the conclusion process of the business combination between CSN mining assets and Namisa and other taxes variation amounting to R$634 million, since 2014 had a decreasesignificant payment of R$1,215 million in net income adjusted for items that do not impact cash and a decrease of R$501 million in our working capital.REFIS. Investing Activities We used cash in our investing activities in the total amount of R$3,5402,865 million in 20122015 and R$5,2751,658 million in 2011.2014. The decreaseincrease of R$1,7351,207 million in cash used in investing activities was mainly a resultdue to: ·the payment of R$2,727 million (US$707 million) related to the purchase of a decreasestake of 4.16% of CongonhasMinérios as part of the business combination between CSN mining assets and Namisa; ·cash margin to cover our derivatives position in the amount of R$1,257725 million; ·the two main cash outflows mentioned above were partially offset by derivatives operations receipt of R$827 million, cash of merged entities in investmentsthe amount of R$923 million and loans from related party received in fixed assets in our main projects.the amount of R$316 million.
Table Of Contents
Financing Activities Cash used in financing activities was R$7493,091 million in 20122015 compared to cash provided by financing activities of R$4,741531 million in 2011.2014. This R$5,4902,560 million differenceincrease was mainly due to: ·to a decrease of R$4,1021,525 million in proceeds from borrowings, and financings;
·an increase of R$1,0551,139 million in amortizations and R$586 million of borrowingsforfaiting and financings; and
·R$803 million in amortization of financings of SWT.
These effects weredrawee risk amortizations, partially offset by a decreaseR$900 million of R$657 millionthe purchase of treasury shares occurred in dividends and interest on equity payments.2014.
Year 20112014 Compared to Year 20102013 Cash Flows Cash and cash equivalents flow increaseddecreased by R$5,1781,310 million in 2011 and2014, compared to a decrease of R$2,2681,896 million in 2010.2013. Operating Activities
Table of contents Cash provided by operations was R$4,202824 million and R$2,5172,723 million, in 20112014 and 2010,2013, respectively. ThisThe R$1,6851,899 million decrease was mainly due to: ·a decrease of the outstanding balance of the Tax Recovery Program (Refis) in the amount of R$1,013 million, due to the adherence to the Early Settlement of Tax Debts – Federal Law 13,043; ·an increase wasof R$1,176 million in inventories mainly due to an increase of 41 days in the average inventory turnover, mainly due to the decrease in steel sales; These effects were partially offset by an increase of R$1,171522 million in net income adjusted for items that do not impact cash and a decreasetrade payables mainly due to an increase of R$514 million27 days in working capital. the supplier payment period. Investing Activities We used cash in our investing activities in the total amount of R$5,2751,658 million in 20112014 and R$4,6362,246 million in 2010.2013. The increasedecrease of R$639588 million in cash used in investing activities was mainly due to an increaseR$642 million reduction of investments in fixed assets to supply the projects, mainly related to: (i) the Casa de Pedra expansion; (ii) the expansion of the Itaguaí Port; (iii) the construction of the long steel mill in the city of Volta Redonda (State of Rio de Janeiro); and (iv) the extension of the Transnordestina railroad.assets. Financing Activities Cash provided byused in financing activities totaledwas R$4,741531 million in 2011,2014 compared to R$4,6162,406 million in 2010.2013. This R$1251,875 million increasedecrease was mainly due to to: ·a decrease in R$1,236 million in dividends and interest on capital paid; ·a decrease of R$1,238946 million in amortizations of borrowings and financings, almostincluding forfaiting and drawee risk operations; ·a increase of R$780 regarding new borrowings and financing. These effects were partially offset by a decreasedisbursements in 2014 through buybacks programs amounting to R$914 million regarding the acquisition of our own shares and R$931172 million in issuances and an increase of R$296 million in payments of dividends and interest on equity.related to debt securities. Trade Accounts Receivable Turnover Ratio Our receivable turnover ratio (the ratio between trade accounts receivable and net operating revenues), expressed in days of sales increaseddecreased 1 day to 30 days on December 31, 2015 from 31 days on December 31, 2012 from 29 days on December 31, 2011.2014. Days Sales inTurnover of Inventory
Our days sales in inventory turnover (obtained by dividing inventories by annualized cost of products sold), expressed in days of cost of products sold decreasedincreased 22 days to 76127 days in 20122015 from 103105 days in 2011.2014,mainly due to a decrease in steel salesvolume. Trade Accounts Payable Turnover Ratio The accounts payable turnover ratio (obtained by dividing trade accounts payable by annualized cost of products sold), expressed in days of cost of products sold, increased to 55was 52 days on December 31, 2012 from 46 days2015 and on December 31, 2011.2014. Liquidity Management Given the capital intensive, and cyclical nature of our industry and the generally volatile economic environment in certain emerging markets, we have retained a substantial amount of cash on hand to run our operations, to satisfyour financial obligations and to be prepared for potential investment opportunities.investmentopportunities. As of December 31, 2012,2015, cash and cash equivalent totaled R$14,445 million.7,861 million, compared to R$8,686 million as of December 31, 2014.
Table Of Contentsof contents We were also takingAs of December 31, 2015, short-term and long-term indebtedness accounted for 6% and 94%, respectively, of our total debt, and the average life of our existing debt was equivalent to approximately eight years, considering a 40-year term for the perpetual bonds issued in September 2010.
In 2013, we took advantage of the currentstrong liquidity conditions to extend the maturity profile of our debt. These activities arewere unrelated to the management of any interest rate, inflation and/or foreign exchange risk exposure. Given the lack of a liquid secondary market for our short termshort-term debt instruments in 2013, we have accumulated cash instead of prepaying our debt prior to final maturity.maturity. As of December 31, 2012,2013, short-term and long-term indebtedness accounted for 7.6%9.6% and 92.4%90.4%, respectively, of our total debt, and the average life of our existing debt was equivalent to approximately 7seven years, considering a 40 year term for the perpetual bonds issued in September 2010. As of December 31, 2014, short-term and long-term indebtedness accounted for 9% and 91%, respectively, of our total debt, and the average life of our existing debt was equivalent to approximately seven years, considering a 40 year term for the perpetual bonds issued in September 2010. Capital Expenditures and Investments CSN invested R$2,170 million in 2015, taking advantage of opportunities to accelerate projects that enhance competitiveness, including: ·The acquisition of new mining equipment, anticipating some of the investments scheduled for 2016 due to current favorable financing conditions. These items of equipment were already helping to reduce mining costs in 2015. ·The accelerated development of the Arcos´ clinker kiln project in Minas Gerais, anticipating higher operating margins in the Southeast System. ·Revamp of the Turbo Generator (TG20) in Presidente Vargas Plant, recovering the nominal energy capacity of 117MW in the TG20. Of total investments, R$376 million went to spare parts and R$561 million to current investments. In 2012, our capital expenditures were2014, we invested a total of R$3,144 2,405 million, R$872 million of which was allocated as follows: jointly controlled investees TLSA: R$984512 million (100%); MRS Logística: R$301 million (33.3%); and Namisa: R$59 million (60%). The remaining R$1,533 million was used inexpended on: construction of a brownfield long steel mill at the Volta Redonda site: R$77 million; expansion of the Transnordestina railroad,steel service center at our CSN Mogi das Cruzes (Prada) facility: R$454 million in 39 million; expansion of the constructionItaguaí Port (TECAR and TECON): R$172 million; expansion of our long steel plant in Volta Redonda, R$381 million in the Casa de Pedra minemine: R$267 million; expansion of the cement plant: R$481 million; and Itaguaí Port expansion,stay-in-business capex: R$73 million 497 million. In 2015, we continued to implement our strategy of developing downstream opportunities and projects based on synergies, new product lines and market niches by creating or expanding current capacity of services centers, as described in our clinker plant and R$219 million in maintenance and repairs.“Item 4B. Business Overview—Facilities.” We expect to meet our liquidity requirements from cash generated from operations, and, if needed, the issuance of debt securities. For details on our Planned Investments see “Item 4D. Property, Plant and Equipment – Equipment—Capital Expenditures – Expenditures—Planned Investments”.Investments.” Company Debt and Derivative Instruments
At December 31, 20122015 and 2011,2014, total debt (composed of current and non-current portions of borrowings and financings) summedwas R$30,28434,283 million and R$28,06730,354 million (excluding transactions costs), respectively, equal to 330%392% and 333%529% of the stockholders’Shareholders’ equity at December 31, 20122015 and 2011,2014, respectively. At December 31, 2012,2015, our short-term debt (composed of current borrowings and financings, which includes current portion of long-term debt) totaled R$2,3261,875 million and our long-term debt (composed of non-current borrowings and financings) totaled R$27,95832,408 million. The foregoing amounts do not include debt of others for which we are contingently liable. See “Item 5E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.”
Table of contents At December 31, 2012,2015, approximately 64%46% of our debt was denominated inreais and substantially all of the remaining balance was denominated in U.S. dollars. Our current policy is to protect ourselves against foreign exchange losses and interest rate losses on our debt and currently our exposure is protected through foreign exchange derivative products, including futures and swaps. and hedge accounting. For a description of our derivative instruments, see Note 13.IV to our consolidated financial statements contained in “Item 18. Financial Statements.” Also see “Item 5A. Operating Results—Results of Operations—Year 2012 Compared to Year 2011”. The components of R$2,3261,875 million of our consolidated current portion of short-term debt outstanding at December 31, 20122015 were: | | | Fixed rate notes
| 6.5% - 10.0%
| 1,265
| BNDES/Finame
| TJLP + 1.5% - 5% and TJR + 1.7% - 2.7%
| 448
| Prepayment financing
| 1% - 7.5% and 104.8% - 111% CDI
| | 335
| Debentures
| 1% + TJLP and 103.6% - 110.8% CDI
| | 145
| CCB
| 112.5% CDI
| 62
| | 1.4% - 8.0% and CDI + 1.2%
| | Total
| | 2,326
|
Components | Average | Total | Interest Rate | (in millions of R$) | Fixed rate notes | 6.5% - 6.9% | 176 | BNDES/Finame | 1.3% + TJLP and fixed rate of 2.5% to 6% + 1.5% | 55 | Prepayment financing | 1.3% - 4.5% and 109.5% to 116.5% of CDI and fixed rate of 8% | 1,017 | Debentures | 110.8% to 113.7% of CDI | 61 | CCB | 112.5% and 113% of CDI | 93 | Perpetual bonds | 7.00% | 5 | Forfaiting | 1.25% to 3.28% | 289 | Others | 1.2% - 8,00% | 179 | Total | | 1,875 |
The components of R$27,95832,408 million of our consolidated long-term debt outstanding at December 31, 20122015 were (amounts are reflected in long-term debt): Components | | Average | Total | | | Interest Rate | (in millions of R$) | Debentures | 1% + TJLP and 103.6% - 110.8% CDI | 4,614 | 110.8% to 113.7% of CDI | 1,750 | Fixed rate notes | 6.5% - 10% | 4,802 | 6.5% – 6.9% | 6,911 | BNDES/Finame | TJLP + 1.5% - 5% and TJR + 1.7% - 2.7% | 1,968 | 1.3% + TJLP and fixed rate of 2.5% to 6% + 1.5% | 1,018 | Perpetual bonds | 7% | 2,043 | 7.00% | 3,905 | Prepayment financing | 1% - 7.5% and 104.8% - 111% CDI | 6,839 | 1% - 7.5% and 109.5% to 116.5% of CDI and fixed rate of 8% | 11,263 | CCB | 112.5% CDI | 7,200 | 112.5% and 113% of CDI | 7,200 | | 1.4% - 8.0% and CDI + 1.2% | | 1.2% - 8,00% | 361 | | | | | 32,408 |
Table Of Contentsof contents The information of our indebtness below refers to the outstanding amount of interest paid in 2012 was R$2,348 million. The local debenture is areal-denominated debt instrument, which includes:
(i)Debentures issued in February 2006, of R$600 million six-year bearing interest at a rate of 103.6% of the CDI rate per annum. On February 1, 2012, the Company liquidated these debentures in the amount of R$635,285 thousand (R$600,000 thousand principal amount and R$35,285 thousand in interest).
(ii)Debentures issued by our controlled company Transnordestina Logística S.A., which obtained approval by FDNE (Fundo de Desenvolvimento do Nordeste) on March 2010 for its First Private Emission of Debentures, convertible into shares, composed of eight series in total, with the overall amount of R$2,672,400. Until December 31, 2011, Transnordestina Logística S.A. had already issued 5 series in the total amount of R$1,615 million.2015.
(iii)· Debenturesdebentures issued in July 2011, of R$1,150 million bearing interest at a rate of 105.8%110.8% of the CDI rate per annum and maturity in 2019.
(iv)· Debenturesdebentures issued in September 2012,March 2014, of R$1,565400 million comprised of two series, one maturing in March 2015 and bearing interest at a rate of 105.8%111.2% of the CDI rate per annum and one maturingmaturity in September2021.
·debentures issued in January 2015, andof R$100 million bearing interest at a rate of 106.0%113.7% of the CDI rate per annum.annum and maturity in 2022. ·debentures issued in July 2015, of R$100 million bearing interest at a rate of 113.7% of the CDI rate per annum and maturity in 2022. Eurodollar and Euronotes issued in accordance with Rule 144A and Regulation S under the Securities Act reflect senior unsecured debt instruments issued by us and our offshore subsidiaries, including (i) including: ·the US$300U.S.$750 million bonds, 10% per annum coupon, and the US$300 million notes, 8.25% per annum coupon, issued in 1997 with final maturity in 2047; (ii) the issuance in December 2003 and January 2004 of US$550 million notes, 9.75% per annum coupon with final maturity in 2013; (iii) the US$400 million notes, 10% per annum coupon, issued in September 2004 and January 2005 with final maturity in 2015, and (iv) the US$750 million notes, 6.875% per annum coupon, issued in September 2009 with maturity in 2019. In·in July 2010, we issued US$U.S.$1 billion notes,bonds, 6.50% per annum coupon and maturity date in July 2020, in January 2012, we priced, through our wholly-owned subsidiary CSN Resources S.A., an additional bond issuance in the amount of U.S.$200 million. The offering price was 106.00% and yield was 5.6% p.a.
·in September 2010, we issued a US$1U.S. $1 billion Perpetual Bond, 7%perpetual bonds, 7.0% per annum coupon. We issued export credit notes, or NCEs: (i) on April 11, 2008, ·in the amount of R$100 million in favor of Banco do Brasil S.A., due 2013; (ii) on September 30, 2009, in the amount of R$1.0 billion, in favor of Banco do Brasil S.A., due 2014; (iii) on2018. In September 30,2015, we amortized R$ 613.3 million resulting in an outstanding balance of R$ 386.7 million. This amortization is related to the rollover of of this debt mentioned below; ·in Septembe 2009, in the amount of R$300 million, in favor of Banco do Brasil S.A., due 2014; (iv) on2018. In September, 2015, we amortized R$180 million resulting in an outstanding balance of R$120 million. This amortization also is related to the rollover of of this debt mentioned below; ·in May 21, 2010 in the amount of R$2.0 billion, in favor of Banco do Brasil S.A., through our subsidiary Congonhas Minérios S.A., due 2018.2019. In September 2015, we amortized R$715 million resulting in an outstanding balance of R$1.3 billion. This amortization also is related to the rollover of this debt mentioned below; ·in April 2011, we issued another NCE, in the amount of R$1.5 billion; in favor of Banco do Brasil S.A., due to 2019. In September 2015, we amortized R$1.0 billion. This amortization also is related to the rollover of this debt mentioned below; ·in March 2013, in the amount of R$ 200 million, in favor of Banco do Brasil S.A., due 2016. In February, 2016 the total amount was extented to 2017; ·in February 2013, in the amount of R$ 45 million, in favor of HSBC Brasil., due 2016;
Table of contents ·in February 2013, in the amount of R$ 100 million, in favor of Bradesco, due 2016; ·in September 2015, R$1.5 billion in favor of Banco do Brasil due 2020. This amortization also is related to the rollover of this debt mentioned below; ·in September 2015, R$715 million, through our subsidiary Congonhas Minérios S.A., in favor of Banco do Brasil due 2020. This amortization also is related to the rollover of this debt mentioned below; Export Pre-Payment issued by CSN: ·in October 2010, in the amount of U.S. $ 66,7 million, in favor of Banco Santander S.A., due 2017; ·in April 2012, in the amount of U.S. $ 30 million, in favor of Banco Safra S.A., due 2017; ·in April 2013, in the amount of U.S. $ 378 million in favor of Banco do Brasil S.A., due 2021; ·in November 2013, in the amount of U.S. $ 200 million, in favor of Banco Bradesco S.A., due 2018; ·in November 2013, in the amount of U.S. $ 345 million, in favor of Banco Bradesco S.A., due 2022; ·in February 2014, in the amount of U.S. $ 100 million, in favor of ING Bank, due 2019; ·in April 2014, in the amount of U.S. $ 200 million, in favor of Banco Santander S.A., due 2019; ·in September 2014, in the amount of U.S. $ 100 million, in favor of Banco Santander S.A., due 2019; ·in December 2014, in the amount of U.S. $ 100 million, in favor of Bank of China, due 2020; ·In April 2015, in the amount of U.S. $ 71 million, in favor of Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation., due 2020; ·In July 2015, in the amount of U.S. $ 77 million, in favor of Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation., due 2020. We contracted credit facilities from Caixa Econômica Federal (CEF), under its special credit for large companies, in the form of a bank credit bill, or CCB: (i) ·on August 18,December, 2009, in the amount of R$2.0 billion and to be amortized in 36 months; (ii) 156 months. In August 2015, we amortized R$1.3 billion resulting in an outstanding balance of R$715 mm. This amortization is related to the rollover of R$2.57 billion mentioned below. ·on February 9,December, 2010, in the amount of R$1.0 billion and to be amortized in 36156 months. In August 2015, we amortized R$1.3 billion resulting in an outstanding balance of R$715 million. This amortization also is related to the rollover of R$2.57 billion mentioned below. In 2011, we contracted two moreadditional CCBs: (i)
Table of contents ·in February 2011, in the amount of R$2.0 billion and to be amortized in 94 months; and (ii) months. In August 2015, we amortized R$1.0 billion resulting in an outstanding balance of R$1.0 billion. This amortization also is related to the rollover of R$2.57 billion mentioned below. ·in August 2011, in the amount of R$2.2 billion and to be amortized in 108 months. In January 2012,September 2015, we priced, throughconcluded the extension of part of our wholly-owned subsidiary CSN Resources S.A., an additional bond issuancedebt with the Caixa Econômica Federal in the amount of US$200 million, throughR$2.57 billion , and with Banco do Brasil, amounting to R$2.21 billion, shifting maturities scheduled for 2016 and 2017 to the reopening of the US$1 billion bonds, at an interest rate of 6.5% p.a., dueperiod between 2018 and 2022 in July 2020. The offering price was 106.00% and yield was 5.6% p.a.installments equally distributed.
Table Of Contents
In January 2012, we secured financing contracted through our subsidiary CSN Steel S.L., in the amount of €120 million, to partially fund the acquisition of all shares held by the Alfonso Gallardo Group, S.L.U. (“Grupo Gallardo”) in the following companies: SWT and Gallardo Sections S.L.U. We contracted Pre-Export Payments from Caterpillar: ·In March 2012, we issued promissory notesApril 2015, in the total amount of R$800 million.U.S $ 71 million, in favor of Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation., due 2020. ·In September 2012,July 2015, in the Company liquidated these promissory notes, paying the principal amount of R$800U.S $ 77 million, and R$33,277 in interest.favor of Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation., due 2020. Maturity Profile The following table sets forth the maturity profile of our long-term debt at December 31, 2012:2015: Maturity in | | Principal Amount | | Principal Amount | | | (In millions of R$) | | (In thousands of R$) | 2014 | | 2,917 | | 2015 | | 3,886 | | 2016 | | 3,282 | | 2017 | | 3,530 | | 1,458,605 | 2018 | | 3,727 | | 5,799,525 | 2019 and thereafter | | 8,573 | | 2019 | | | 7,870,087 | 2020 | | | 8,483,766 | 2021 | | | 2,320,721 | After 2021 | | | 2,667,072 | Perpetual bonds | | 2,043 | | 3,904,800 | Total | | 27,958 | | 32,484,576 |
5C. Research & Development and Innovation We have been investingCSN has continuously invested in Research &and Development to develop newimprove its products and processes, required bythus meeting market demands and assuring customers' requirements. In 2015 was instituted in the Company a demanding market. Amongnew unit called INOVA CSN, an organizational environment created in order to facilitate innovation projects in products, processes, energy efficiency and environmental to the business units of the entire Corporation, through financial funding from private and public institutions. Inova CSN connects the company to technological and scientific development environment, local and worldwide, aimed at innovations that provide added value to us and our customers. The highlight of the Innovation Strategic Plan 2015 is the Product Innovation Project:Development of Advanced High Strength Galvanized Steels in Industrial Scale Applied to the Automotive Industry, Aiming to Decrease the Fuel Consumption and Impacts to the Environment.
Table of contents Total expenses in 2015 in research, development and innovation reached U.S. $ 16 million compared to U.S. $ 6.8 million in 2014 and U.S. $ 6.5 million in 2013. The current projects we can highlight: ·Thein development of pre-painted steel, coated with Organo-Metallic filmare:
- Advanced High Strength Galvanized Steel Dual Phase DP800 for the automotive industry to application in structural parts.
- Advanced Press Hardening Galvanized Steel - PHS 1500 for the automotive industry, structural parts.
- High Strength IF (Interstitial Free) Galvanized Steel – IF 260 and 300 HS, for the automotive industry, special applications to high strength and good formability.
- Structural High Strength Galvanized Steels – class 450, 500 and 550, for application in
fuel tanks in automobiles, reducing fuel consumption;·Advanced High Strength Steels, Ultra Low Carbon Steels (extra deep drawing quality), Bake-Hardening Steels, High Resistance Interstitial Free Steels, High Strength and Low Alloy and Rephosphorized High Strength Steels, allowing the production of lighter vehicles;civil construction market, mainly for storage silos.
·CSN Extra Fino ® cold rolledHigh-carbon Hot-Rolled steel for chainsaws (SAE 8660), designed to US market.- Tin-plated steel in new applications in
white goodsBrazilian market (aerosol cans, easy open ends). - High Strength Low Alloy cold-rolled steel, HSLA 420 and
steel furniture, developed in response to a worldwide trend.500, for the automotive industry.
5D. Trend Information Overview
The global economic activity is recovering at a moderate pace, still reflecting the high level of uncertainty surrounding the international scenario. For 2013, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) estimates global growth of 3.5%.
For the European Union, the European Central Bank is forecasting stagnation in 2013 and growth of 1.1% in 2014. The Bank of England expects GDP growth of 1% in 2013 and annualized inflation of 3%, forecasted to remain above the 2% target for two years.
With regard to the United States, the Fed estimates GDP growth of between 2.3% and 2.8% in 2013. However, the US$85 billion cut in the U.S. budget may affect several economic sectors, resulting in a reduction of up to 1% in the GDP estimates.
The Chinese Central Bank maintained its 2013 GDP growth estimate at 7.5%. During the Central Economic Work Conference held in December, the Chinese authorities singled out urban growth as a key factor in fueling domestic demand, deemed necessary in order to reduce the country’s dependence on exports, given the uncertaintiesin the global economy. At the same time, the Chinese government is expected to continue with its proactive fiscal policies and prudent monetary measures.
Table Of Contents
With regards to Brazil, GDP growth is expected to reach 3.00% in 2013, while the IPCA is expected to total 5.71%, according to the Central Bank’s FOCUS report. COPOM indicates that it will monitor the macroeconomic scenario in order to define its next steps, with the possibility of increasing the Selic interest rate if inflation continues to rise.
Steel AccordingThe WSA expects apparent steel consumption to the WSA, world steel demand is expected to increasegrow by 3.2%0.7% worldwide in 2013, totaling 1.46 billion tons, with China accounting for 659 million tons.
2016 and decrease 2.0% in China. The IABr expectsestimates domestic sales growth of 7.7%17.4 million tons in 2013, fueled by government measures such as the reduction in electricity tariffs, the increase in import taxes for certain steel products and the end of fiscal conflicts between the Brazilian states. It also expects2016, with apparent consumption of flat and long steel of 26.419.4 million tons in 2013, a 4.3% increase over 2012. Continuing with the goal of diversifying and investing in the expected growth of the construction industry in the domestic market, we are constructing a long steel plant with a capacity of 500 kta, including rebar and wire rods in our portfolio.tons.
Mining CRU forecastsIn 2015, the seaborne iron ore trade will reach 1.43 billion tonsmarket was adversely affected by 2017, a 33% growthsubstantial 43% price decrease, as comparedthe Platts Fe62% CFR China index fell from US$68/dmt at the beginning of the year to US$39/dmt at end of December.This decrease was due to the increased supply capacity in Australia and Brazil along with the level reacheddownturn in 2012.investments in China’s real estate sector due to the gradual slowdown of the economy.
Pressured by slower than expected GDP performance during 2012, theNevertheless, Chinese government announced last September a US$157 billion stimulus package focused on infrastructure investments. This change in expectations has resulted in better fundamentals for steel, and since then has been sustaining the appetite for seaborne iron ore. Chineseannual iron ore imports are expectedincreased by 2.2% when compared to increase by 9% in 2013,2014, reaching the record volume of 782 million tons.
According to CRU, exports in Brazil show a tendency to increase until at least 2017. By this time, exports should total approximately 452953 million tons, an increase of 41% over current levels. For 2013,while the forecast is for Brazil to export 332 million tons.
Considering this scenario, we expect to reach an annual sales level of 89 million tons per year ofglobal seaborne iron ore products from Casa de Pedra, Namisa and third party purchases. To ensure the production outflow, we expect the Itaguaí Portmarket grew by 2.1% to reach an 84 mtpy shipment capacity.1.42 billion tons.
Cement
Prospects for the sector remain positive. In 2013, the construction industry is expected to benefit from lower taxes and higher investments in infrastructure. ABRAMAT estimates construction material domestic sales growth 4.5% greater in 2013 than 2012, fueled by a greater number of property launches and the construction of homes within the government’sMinha Casa, Minha Vida housing program. In addition, the highway, railway, port and airport concession programs and the construction related to the World Cup are expected to gain momentum.
We are analyzing the expansion of our grinding capacity to 5.4 million tons, to capture the strong growth expected for the construction sector, fueled by increased income and employment, incentives for homebuyers and the expansion of Brazil's infrastructure. For details on our Planned Investments see “Item 4D. Property, Plant and Equipment – Capital Expenditures – Planned Investments”.
5E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements In addition to the debt that is reflected on our balance sheet, we are contingently liable for the off-balance concession payments and also for “take-or-pay” contractual obligations. The following table summarizes all of theoff-balance sheet obligations for which we are contingently liable and which are not reflected under liabilities in our consolidated financial statements:
Table Of Contents
Contingent Liability with Respect to Consolidated and Non-Consolidated Entities as of December 31, 20122015 | | Aggregate Amount | | Maturity | | | (In million of R$) | Guarantees of Debt: | | | | | Transnordestina | | 1,633 | | 2012-2028 | | Contingent Liability for Concession Payments(1): | | | | | Sepetiba Tecon | | 310 | | 2026 | Transnordestina | | 101 | | 2027 | Solid Bulks Terminal - TECAR | | 1,251 | | 2022 | MRS Logística S.A | | 1,144 | | 2026 | Total | | 2,806 | | | ”Take-or-Pay” Contractual Obligations | | | | | MRS Logística S.A. | | 660 | | 2016 | White Martins Gases Industriais Ltda. | | 440 | | 2016 | Companhia Estadual de Gás do Rio de Janeiro – CEG Rio(2) | | 0 | | | Ferrovia Centro Atlântica – FCA | | 270 | | 2020 | Vale S/A | | 221 | | 2014 | Companhia Paranaense de Gás - COMPAGÁS | | 181 | | 2024 | Companhia Paranaense de Energia - COPEL | | 62 | | 2021 | ALL(2) | | 0 | | | K&K Tecnologia | | 73 | | 2023 | Harsco Metals Ltda | | 45 | | 2014 | Siemens | | 20 | | 2013 | Total | | 1,971 | | | | | | | | | | Total Contingent Liability with Respect to Consolidated and Non-consolidated Entities: | | 6,411 | | |
| Aggregate Amount | | Maturity | | (In millions of R$) | Guarantees of Debt: | | | | Transnordestina | 2,591 | | Until 09/19/2056 and indefinite |
(1) Other consortia members are also jointly and severally liable for these payments.
(2) These contracts are under renegotiations.
Contingent Liability for Concession Payments(1): | Concession | Type of service | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | After 2019 | | Total | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | FTL (Ferrovia Transnordestina Logística) | 30-year concession granted on December 31, 1997, renewable for another 30 years, to develop public service and operating the railway system in northeastern Brazil. The northeastern railway system covers 4238 kilometers of railway network and operates in Maranhão, Piauí, Ceará, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Alagoas and Rio Grande do Norte. | | 8,229 | | 8,229 | | 8,229 | | 8,229 | | 65,832 | | 98,748 | Tecar | Concession to operate the TECAR, a solid bulk terminal, one of the four terminals that make up the Port of Itaguai, located in Rio de Janeiro.The concession agreement expires in 2022, renewable for another 25 years. | | 125,326 | | 125,326 | | 125,326 | | 125,326 | | 3,509,116 | | 4,010,420 | Tecon | 25-year concession started in July 2001, renewable for another 25 years to operate the container terminal at the Port of Itaguai. | | 27,927 | | 27,927 | | 27,927 | | 27,927 | | 181,523 | | 293,231 | | | | 161,482 | | 161,482 | | 161,482 | | 161,482 | | 3,756,471 | | 4,402,399 | | | | | | | | (1) Other consortia members are also jointly and severally liable for these payments. |
Table of contents “Take-or-Pay” Contractual Obligations Payments in the period(in millions of R$) | Type of service | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | After 2019 | | Total | Transportation of iron ore, coal, coke, steel products, cement and mining products. | | 263,266 | | 197,646 | | 624,459 | | 595,951 | | 595,951 | | 595,951 | | 3,916,115 | | 6,328,427 | Unloading, storage, movement, loading and railroad transportation services. | | 5,570 | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | Supply of power, natural gas, oxigen, nitrogen, argon and iron ore pellets. | | 1,011,416 | | 1,025,236 | | 342,817 | | 32,205 | | 32,205 | | 32,205 | | 64,409 | | 503,362 | Processing of slag generated during pig iron and steel production | | 49,739 | | 104,013 | | 18,743 | | 8,507 | | 8,507 | | 7,074 | | 22,988 | | 65,819 | Manufacturing, repair, recovery and production of ingot casting machine units. | | 40,250 | | 127,776 | | 2,885 | | - | | - | - | | - | | 2,885 | | | 1,370,241 | | 1,452,900 | | 988,904 | | 636,663 | | 636,663 | | 635,230 | | 4,003,512 | | 6,900,972 |
Table of contents Guarantees of Debt We guarantee the loans that BNDES has granted to Transnordestina in May and December 2005, and in January 2006, all of which mature by May 2028,September 19, 2056, adjusted based on the TJLP plus 1.5% per annum. The total outstanding amount of the debt as of December 31, 20122015 was R$1,6332,590 million. The approved construction investment is R$7,542,000 and the balance of disbursable funds will be adjusted using the IPCA as from April 2012. Should additional funds be required, they will be provided by CSN and/or third parties under Permanent Track Use contracts. The budget to conclude the project is under review, currently it is being analyzed by the competent agencies (shareholders), and it is expected that the reviewed budget will be as follows: Missão Velha-Salgueiro: R$0.4 billion, Salgueiro-Trindade: R$0.7 billion, Trindade-Eliseu Martins: R$2.4 billion, Missão Velha-Porto de Pecém: R$3 billion, Salgueiro-Porto de Suape: R$4.7 billion, amounting R$ 11.2 billion. ConcessionsContingent Liability for Concession Payments
FTL - Ferrovia Transnordestina Logística S.A.and Transnordestina Logística S.A. We hold interest in companies that have concessions to operate the Northeastern railway system, which operates in the states of Maranhão, Piauí, Ceará, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Alagoas and Rio Grande do Norte and connects with the region’s leading ports, offering an important competitive advantage through opportunities for intermodal transportation solutions and made-to-measure logistics projects. Resolution No. 4,042/2013 issued by the ANTT authorized the partial spin-off of TLSA and, as a result, the Northeastern railway system is currently divided into the Railway System I, operated by FTL, and the Railway System II, operated by TLSA.. On September 20, 2013 we entered into an investment agreement with our partners in TLSA, Valec Engenharia, Construções e Ferrovias S.A. and Fundo de Desenvolvimento do Nordeste – FDNE, two Brazilian federal government entities focused on infrastructure and the development of the northeastern region. Under this investment agreement we and our partners have agreed on a revised budget of R$7,5 billion to complete the construction of the Railway System II. Such investment agreement also provides for indicative terms and conditions, including amounts, under which BNDES, Banco do Nordeste Brasileiro – BNB and certain Brazilian development agencies have agreed to provide long-term financing for the completion of Railway System II. Although we have received indicative terms, the financing is subject to several conditions, including the satisfactory completion of internal and credit approval processes by all lenders. If any of the conditions are not met, including final credit approval by all agencies involved in terms and costs reasonable to us, we may not be able to obtain the financing. As of December 31, 2015, we held 89.79% of the capital stock of FTL, which has a concession to operate the Railway System I (which encompasses the stretches between the cities of São Luís – Mucuripe, Arrojado – Recife, Itabaiana – Cabedelo, Paula Cavalcante – Macau and Propiá – Jorge Lins) of Brazil’s Northeastern railway system until 2027, renewable for an additional 30 years. The Railway System I consists of 4,238 km of railways. As of December 31, 2015, R$98.7 million in concession payments was outstanding over the remaining 12 years of the concession.
Table of contents Tecar We hold the concession to operate TECAR, a solid bulks terminal, one of four terminals that form the Itaguaí Port, located in the State of Rio de Janeiro. In 2015, the company achieved the anticipated contract renewal for additional 25 years and, accordingly, the expiration date was postponed from 2022 to 2047. Itaguaí Port, in turn, is connected to the Presidente Vargas Steelworks, Casa de Pedra and Congonhas Minérios by the Southeastern railway system. Our imports of coal and coke are made through this terminal. Under the terms of the concession, we have the obligation to ship at least 3.0 million tons of bulk cargo annually and to make available room to ship 2.0 million tons of third parties’ iron ore and pellets cargoes. As of December 31, 2015, R$4,010 million was outstanding over the remaining 32 years of the concession. Sepetiba Tecon We own 99.99% of Sepetiba Tecon S.A., or TECON, which holds a concession to operate, for a 25-year term (renewable for additional 25 years), the container terminal at the Itaguaí Port, located in the State of Rio de Janeiro. As of December 31, 2012,2015, R$310 293 million of the cost of the concession was outstanding and payable over the remaining 1411 years of the concession. For more information, see “Item 4D. Property, Plant and Equipment – Capital Expenditures – Planned Investments”. Transnordestina
As of December 31, 2012, we held 76.13% of the capital stock of Transnordestina Logística S.A., which has a 30-year concession granted in 1997 to operate Brazil’s Northeastern railway system. The Northeastern railway system currently covers 4,534 km of track and operates in the states of Maranhão, Piauí, Ceará, Paraíba,Pernambuco, Alagoas and Rio Grande do Norte. It also connects with the region’s leading ports, thereby offering an important competitive advantage through opportunities for intermodal transportation solutions and made-to-measure logistics projects. As of December 31, 2012, R$101 million was outstanding over the remaining 15 years of the concession.
Table Of Contents
Solid Bulks Terminal
We hold the concession to operate TECAR, a solid bulks terminal, one of four terminals that form the Itaguaí Port, located in the State of Rio de Janeiro, for a term expiring in 2022 and renewable for another 25 years. Itaguaí Port, in turn, is connected to the Presidente Vargas Steelworks, Casa de Pedra and Namisa by the Southeastern railway system. Our imports of coal and coke are made through this terminal. Under the terms of the concession, we undertook to load and unload at least 3.0 million tons of bulk cargo annually. Among the approved investments that we announced is the development and expansion of the solid bulks terminal at the Itaguaí Port to handle up to 84 million tonsTransportation of iron ore, per year.
MRS Logística S.Acoal, coke, steel products, cement and mining products
As of December 31, 2012, we held a 33.27% participation in MRS Logística S.A., which holds a concession to operate Brazil’s Southeastern railway system until 2026, renewable for an additional 30 years, We have contracts with MRS Logística S.A. for the transportation of iron ore from the mines of Casa de Pedra in Minas Gerais to Volta Redonda and coke and coal from the Port of Itaguaí (RJ) to Volta Redonda, and transportation of our exports to the Ports of Itaguaí (RJ) and Rio de Janeiro (RJ). As of December 31, 2012, R$1,144 million was outstanding over the remaining 14 years of the concession.
Contractual Obligations
Namisa
Port Operating Services Agreement
On October 21, 2008, CSN entered into an agreement for the provision of port services to Namisa for a 34-year period, consisting of receiving, handling, storing and shipping Namisa’s iron ore in annual volumes that range from 18.0 million tons to 39.0 million tonnes. On December 30, 2008, CSN has received the amount of approximately R$5.3 billion as an advance for part of the payments due for the services to be provided under this agreement. The amounts charged for these port services are reviewed on a quarterly basis and adjusted considering the changes in the market price of iron ore.
High Silica ROM
On October 21, 2008, CSN entered into an agreement for the supply of high silica crude iron ore ROM to Namisa for a period of 30 years in volumes that range from 42.0 million tons to 54.0 million tons per year. On December 30, 2008, CSN received approximately R$1.6 billion as an advance for part of the payments due for the supplies to be made under this agreement. The supply price is reviewed on a quarterly basis and adjusted considering the changes in the market price of iron ore.
Low Silica ROM
On October 21, 2008, CSN entered into an agreement for the supply of low silica crude iron ore ROM to Namisa for an effective period of 9 years in volumes that range from 8 million tons to 30.6 million tons per year. On December 30, 2008, CSN received approximately R$424 million as an advance for part of the payments due for the supplies to be made under this agreement. The supply price is reviewed on a quarterly basis and adjusted considering the changes in the market price of iron ore.
“Take-or-Pay” Contractual Obligations
MRS Logística S.A. Transportation of Iron Ore, Coal and Coke to Volta Redonda
Table Of Contents
The volume set for iron ore and pellets is 8,280,0007,500,000 tons per year and for coal, coke and other reductionsmelter products is 3,600,0003,500,000 tons per year. Variation of up to 10% is accepted, with a guarantee of payment of at least 90%80%, but the obligation is for each item individually. MRS, on the other hand, is required to transport at least 80% of the volume established by the agreement. The agreement expired on December 31, 2012 and CSN and MRS are negotiating the terms of a new contract. Transportation of Iron Ore for Export from Itaguaí The volume set iswas 40,000,000 tons per year for the first three years, with gradual increases for the following years, with a guarantee of payment of at least 80%. We may increase or decrease the volume set in the agreement every year by up to 10% and 15%, respectively, taking into consideration the volume informed in the previous year. This agreement expires on November 30, 2026. For both contracts we have flexibility to renegotiate the “take-or-pay,” if the volume is not reached. As we are a shareholder of MRS, theThe minimum amounts to be paid under the contract terms are calculated by a tariff model that assures competitive prices.
Transportation of Steel Products The volume set is 2,750,000 tons per year, with an acceptable variation of up to 20%. 10%,with a guarantee of payment of at least 80%,The agreement covers the transportation of steel products from the Presidente Vargas Steelworks to third party terminals, and expires on May 31, 2016.
Cement Transportation - CSN CIMENTOS We
This agreement covers transportation of bagged cement from UPV to Rio de Janeiro, São José dos Campos and MRS are negotiatingSão Paulo. For 2014, the volume set was 376,251 tons; for 2015 was 520,000 and for 2016 we expect it to be 545,063 tons. The volume set is 633,600 from 2017 until 2026. Under the terms of a new contract.the agreement, we are committed to provide at least 80% of the volume of cement to MRS. This agreement is valid until 2026. White Martins Gases Industriais Ltda. Ferrovia Centro Atlântica - FCA
Transportation of Reduction Products
Table of contents This agreement covers transportation of reduction products from the city of Arcos to the city of Volta Redonda. As of 2014, volume set for reduction products was 1,805,000 tons with an acceptable variation of up to 5%. For 2015 the volume set was 1,860,000 tons with a guarantee of payment of at least 90%. Transportation of Clinker This agreement covers transportation of clinker products from the city of Arcos to the city of Volta Redonda. As of 2014, the volume set for clinker was 660,000 tons per year with an acceptable variation of up to 10%. This agreement will expire on April 19, 2020. In 2014, the calculation of “take-or-pay” considered the total volume performed in both contracts - clinker and reduction products – regardless of the percentage transported of each one. For 2015, the volume set was 660,000 tons with a guarantee of payment of at least 90%. Unloading, storage, movement, loading and railroad transportation services. In 2014, we signed a three-year “take-or-pay” agreement by which we are committed to guarantee at least 75% of cargo for transport in the first year and at least 69% of volume through the end of the agreement. Supply of power, natural gas, oxygen, nitrogen, argon and iron ore pellets. To secure gas supply (oxygen, nitrogen and argon), in 1994 we signed a 22-year “take-or-pay” agreement with White Martins Gases Industriais, by which we are committed to acquire at least 90% of the gas volume guaranteed in the agreement with White Martins’ plant.contract. Under the terms of the agreement, we are not required to advance funds raised against future processing charges if White Martinsthe supplier is unable to meet its financial obligations. Companhia Estadual de Gás do Rio de Janeiro
To secure natural gas supply, in 2007 we signed a five-year “take-or-pay” agreement, with CEG Rio, by which we are committed to acquire at least 70% of the gas volume guaranteed inprovided by the agreement with CEG Rio.supplier. Under the terms of the agreement, we are not required to advance funds raised against future processing charges if CEG Riothe supplier is unable to meet its financial obligations. In addition, if we do not acquire the minimum volume agreed, the amount paid which relates to that difference may be compensated in future years, including one year after the contract’s expiration. We and CEG Rio are negotiating new values for this contract.
Ferrovia Centro Atlântica - FCA
Transportation of Reduction Products
This agreement covers transportation of reduction products from the city of Arcos to the city of Volta Redonda. The volume setis valid until June 30, 2016. However, it has an automatic renewal clause for reduction products from January to April of 2012 was 633,333 tons, with an acceptable variation of up to 5%. The volume set from May to December of 2012 was 1,382,222 tons, with an acceptable variation of up to 10%.
As of 2013, volume setmore six months which can be extended for reduction products is 2,073,333 tons per year, with an acceptable variation of up to 10%. This agreement will expire on August 31, 2013.
Table Of Contents
Transportation of Clinker
This agreement covers transportation of clinker products from the city of Arcos to the city of Volta Redonda.
The volume set for clinker transportation from January to April of 2012 was 250,000 tons, with an acceptable variation of up to 29%. The volume set from May to December of 2012 was 440,000 tons, with an acceptable variation of up to 10%.
As of 2013, the volume set for clinker is 660,000 tons per year, with an acceptable variation of up to 10%. This agreement will expire on April 19, 2020.
In 2013, the calculation of “take-or-pay” will consider the total volume performed in both contracts - clinkerequal and reduction products – regardless of the percentage transported of each one.
Vale S.A.successive periods.
To secure pellets supply, in 2009 we signed a 5-year “take-or-pay” agreement, with Vale, by which we are committed to acquire at least 90% of the pellets volume guaranteed in an agreement with Vale.provided by the supplier. Under the terms of the agreement, we are not required to advance funds raised against future processing charges if Valethe supplier is unable to meet its financial obligations. Companhia Paranaense de Gás - COMPAGÁS
We and Companhia Paranaense de Gás entered into In 2015 we signed a 20-year contract to secure natural gas supply. According to the “take or pay”1-year agreement without “take-or-pay” clause, we are committed to acquire at least 80%but with a quarterly negotiation of the annual natural gas volume contracted from Companhia Paranaense de Gás.
Companhia Paranaense de Energia – COPELpellet prices.
To secure energy supply, in 2001 we entered into a 20-year agreement with Companhia Paranaense de Energia.agreement. According to the “take or pay” clause, we are committed to acquire at least 80% of the annual energy volume contracted from Companhia Paranaense de Energia.the supplier. América Latina Logística - ALL
This agreement covers transportationProcessing of slag generated during pig iron and steel products from Volta Redonda to CSN Paraná. Volume set for steel products is 20,000 tons per month,with an acceptable variation of up to 10%. This agreement was initially valid until August 31, 2012, and CSN and ALL are negotiating the terms of a new contract.
K&K Tecnologiaproduction
CSN undertakes to acquire at least 3,0002,400 metric tons of blast furnace mud for processing at CSN's mud concentration plant. This agreement is valid until March 31, 2023. Harsco Metals Ltda
The Harsco Metals Ltda.supplier undertakes to perform the Scrapscrap recovery Servicesservices resulting from the process of production of pig iron and steel from Presidente Vargas Steelworks, receiving by this process the equivalent in value of the result of multiplying the unit price (U.S.$/t) by the total Liquid Steel CSN’s Mill production, with a guarantee of a minimum production of liquid steel corresponding to 400,000 tons.This agreement is valid until June 30, 2014.March 31, 2016 and is under negotiation for renewal.
Table of contents SiemensManufacturing, repair, recovery and production of ingot casting machine units.
Siemens Vaiz Metal ServicesThe supplier provides Continuous Casting Machines Maintenance Servicescontinuous casting machines maintenance services in steel production at Presidente Vargas Steelworks, with a guarantee of a minimum production of 365,000 tons per month. This agreement is valid until June 30, 2014.expired in December 31, 2015. For 2016 we negotiated the minimum production to an average of 278,000 ton per month.
5F. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations
Table Of Contents
The following table represents our long-term contractual obligations as of December 31, 2012:2015: | | Payment due by period | Payment due by period | | | (In millions of R$) | (In millions of R$) | | | | | | | | | | | More | | | | More | Contractual obligations | | | | Less than | | | | | | than 5 | | Less than | | | than 5 | | | Total | | 1 year | | 1-3 years | | 3-5 years | | years | Total | 1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | years | Long-term accrued finance | | | | | | | | | | | | | | charges(1) | | 15,196 | | 1,885 | | 3,328 | | 2,360 | | 7,623 | 23,214 | 3,276 | 6,202 | 4,062 | 9,674 | Taxes payable in installments | | 1,119 | | 97 | | 197 | | 188 | | 637 | 112 | 24 | 22 | 15 | 51 | Long-term debt (2) | | 27,856 | | 2,887 | | 7,131 | | 7,231 | | 10,607 | 32,408 | 1,435 | 13,617 | 10,793 | 6,563 | “Take-or-Pay” contracts | | 1,971 | | 609 | | 817 | | 314 | | 231 | 6,901 | 989 | 1,273 | 1,270 | 3,369 | Derivatives swap agreements(2)(3) | | 4 | | 4 | | 0 | | 0 | | 0 | 72 | 0 | 0 | Concession agreements(3)(4) | | 2,806 | | 235 | | 486 | | 486 | | 1,598 | 4,402 | 161 | 323 | 323 | 3,595 | | | | Purchase obligations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Raw materials(4)(5) | | 1,522 | | 998 | | 484 | | 11 | | 29 | 629 | 447 | 182 | 0 | 0 | Maintenance(5)(6) | | 296 | | 222 | | 74 | | 0 | | 0 | 1,218 | 908 | 309 | 0 | 0 | Utilities/Fuel(6)(7) | | 1,668 | | 793 | | 409 | | 349 | | 117 | 270 | 235 | 15 | 7 | 13 | Total | | 3,486 | | 2,013 | | 967 | | 360 | | 147 | 2,116 | 1,590 | 506 | 7 | 13 | | | | (1) These accrued finance charges refer to the cash outflow related to the contractual interest expense of our long-term debt and were calculated using the contractual interest rates taken forward to the maturity dates of each contract. | | (1) These accrued finance charges refer to the cash outflow related to the contractual interest expense of our long-term debt and were calculated using the contractual interest rates taken forward to the maturity dates of each contract. | (2) These amounts were presented net of transaction costs and issue premiums. | | (2) These amounts were presented net of transaction costs and issue premiums. | (3) Derivative swap agreements were calculated based on market prices, on December 31, 2015, for futures with similar maturity to our derivative swap agreements. | | (3) Derivative swap agreements were calculated based on market prices, on December 31, 2015, for futures with similar maturity to our derivative swap agreements. | (4) Refers to TECON, TECAR and FTL concessions agreements | | (4) Refers to TECON, TECAR and FTL concessions agreements | (5) Refers mainly to purchases of coal, tin, aluminum and zinc, which comprise part of the raw materials for steel manufacturing and take-or-pay contracts. | | (5) Refers mainly to purchases of coal, tin, aluminum and zinc, which comprise part of the raw materials for steel manufacturing and take-or-pay contracts. | (6) We have outstanding contracts with several contractors in order to maintain our plants in good operating conditions; due to the strong demand for specialized maintenance service, the term of some of these contracts is for more than one year. | | (6) We have outstanding contracts with several contractors in order to maintain our plants in good operating conditions; due to the strong demand for specialized maintenance service, the term of some of these contracts is for more than one year. | (7) Refers mainly to natural gas, power supply and cryogenics, which are provided by limited suppliers; and with some of which we maintain long-term contracts. | | (7) Refers mainly to natural gas, power supply and cryogenics, which are provided by limited suppliers; and with some of which we maintain long-term contracts. |
(1)
| These accrued finance charges refer to the cash outflow related to the contractual interest expense of our long-term debt and were calculated using the contractual interest rates taken forward to the maturity dates of each contract.
| (2)
| Derivative swap agreements were calculated based on market prices, on December 31, 2012, for futures with similar maturity to our derivative swap agreements.
| (3)
| Refers to TECON, TECAR, MRS and Transnordestina’s concessions agreements
| (4)
| Refers mainly to purchases of coal, tin, aluminum, zinc and iron ore (pellets), which comprise part of the raw materials for steel manufacturing.
| (5)
| We have outstanding contracts with several contractors in order to maintain our plants in good operating conditions; due to the strong demand for specialized maintenance service, the term of some of these contracts is for more than one year.
| (6)
| Refers mainly to natural gas, power supply and cryogenics, which are provided by limited suppliers; and with some of which we maintain long-term contracts.
|
5G. Safe Harbor See “Forward-Looking Statements.”
Table of contents Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees 6A. Directors and Senior Management General We are managed by our Board of Directors (Conselho de Administração), which consists of up to eleven members, and our Board of Executive Officers (Diretoria Executiva), which consists of two to nine Executive Officers with no specific designation (one of whom is the Chief Executive Officer). In accordance with our bylaws (Estatuto Social), each Director is elected for a term of one year by our shareholders at an annual shareholders’ meeting. Our bylaws require our employees to be represented by one Director on the Board of Directors. The members of the Board of Executive Officers are appointed by the Board of Directors for a two-year term. Our Board of Directors is responsible for setting general guidelines and policies for our business and our Board of Executive Officers is responsible for the implementation of such guidelines and policies and for our day-to-day operations. As of the date of this annual report, our Board of Directors was comprised of one Chairman one Vice Chairman and five members, and our Board of Executive Officers was comprised of our Chief Executive Officer and sixfive Executive Officers. Our Directors and Executive Officers as of the date of this annual report are: Name | | Position | | First Elected on | | Last Elected on | Board of Directors | | | | | | | Benjamin Steinbruch | | Chairman | | April 23, 1993 | | April 30, 2013 28, 2016 | Jacks Rabinovich
| | Vice Chairman
| | April 23, 1993
| | April 30, 2013
| Fernando Perrone | | Member | | September 26, 2002 | | April 30, 201328, 2016 | Antonio Francisco dos Santos
| Fabiam Franklin | Member | | December 23, 1997April 28, 2016
| | April 30, 2013 28, 2016 | Yoshiaki Nakano | | Member | | April 29, 2004 | | April 30, 2013 28, 2016 | Antonio Bernardo Vieira Maia | | Member | | April 30, 2013 | | April 30, 201328, 2016 | Aloysio Meirelles de Miranda Filho
| Léo Steinbruch | Member | | April 30, 201328, 2015 | | April 30, 201328, 2016 |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Board of Executive Officers | | | | | | | Benjamin Steinbruch | | Chief Executive Officer | | April 30, 2002 | | August 2, 201112, 2015 | Enéas Garcia Diniz | | Executive Officer | | June 21, 2005 | | August 2, 201112, 2015 | José Taragano
| Paulo Rogério Caffarelli | Executive Officer | | December 15, 2009 March 10, 2015
| | August 2, 201112, 2015 | David Moise Salama | | Executive Officer | | August 2, 2011 | | August 2, 201112, 2015 | Luis Fernando Barbosa Martinez | | Executive Officer | | August 2, 2011 | | August 2, 201112, 2015 | Juarez SalibaFabio Eduardo de AvelarPieri Spina
| Excutive Officer | | September 18, 2015 | | September 18, 2015 | Pedro Gutemberg Quariguasi Netto | Executive Officer | | October 26, 2011May 11, 2016
| | October 26, 2011
| Tufi Daher Filho
| | Executive Officer
| | October 4, 2012
| | October 4, 2012May 11, 2016
|
Table Of Contents
The next election for our Board of Directors is expected to take place inon April 2014.2017. The next election for our Board of Executive Officers is expected to take place in the next meeting of our Board of Directors.August 2017. Board of Directors Benjamin Steinbruch. Mr. Steinbruch has been a member of our Board of Directors since April 23, 1993, and has simultaneously held the positions of Chairman since April 28, 1995 and CEO since April 30, 2002. He is also a member of the Administrative Board of the Portuguese Chamber, 1st Vice-President of the Federation of Industries of the State of São Paulo - FIESP since September 2004, member of FIESP’s Superior Strategic Board, advisor to the Robert Simonsen Institute and advisormember of the Institute for Industrial Development Studies - IEDI.Interinstitutional Advisory Board, or CCI, of the Superior Court of the State of São Paulo. Over the past five years, he also served as Chairman of the Board of Directors and CEO of Vicunha Siderurgia S.A. and of Nacional Minérios S.A., Vice ChairmanChaiman of the Board of Directors of Textília S.A., DirectorChairman of the Board of Directors of Vicunha Aços S.A., Vicunha Steel S.A., VicunhaFibra Cia.Securitizadora de Créditos Financeiros, Fibra Cia. Securitizadora de Créditos Imobiliários and Banco Fibra S.A., member of the Board of Directors of Elizabeth S.A. – Indústria Têxtil, Vicunha Participações S.A. and Vicunha Steel S.A., Officer of Rio Purus Participações S.A., and Officer of Rio Iaco (all these companies belong to the controlling group of CSN)Participações S.A., Director of Prada Metallurgical Company and Nacional Minérios S.A. (both controlled by CSN), member of the Deliberative Council of the CSN Foundation, and Administrator of Fazenda Alvorada de Bragança Agro-Pastoril Ltda., Ibis Agrária Ltda., Ibis II Empreendimentos Ltda., Ibis Participações e Serviços Ltda., and Haras Phillipson Ltda.(all these companies belong to our controlling group), Chairman of the Board of Directors of Companhia Metalúrgica Prada and FTL – Ferrovia Transnordestina Logística S.A. (bothcompanies are controlled by us), Chairman of the Board of Directors of Transnordestina Logística S.A. and Nacional Minérios S.A. (both companies jointly controlled by us, having Nacional Minérios S.A. ceased to exist on December 31, 2015), Chairman of the Deliberative Council of the CSN Foundation . Mr. Steinbruch graduated from the Business School of Fundação Getúlio Vargas – FGV/SP and specialized in Marketing and Finance also from Fundação Getúlio Vargas - FGV/SP.
Jacks Rabinovich. Mr. Rabinovich has been a memberTable of our Board of Directors since April 23, 1993 and Vice Chairman since April 24, 2001. Mr. Rabinovich graduated in Civil Engineering from Universidade Mackenzie - SP, and has a specialization in Textile Engineering from the Lowell Institute, Massachusetts - USA.contents
Fernando Perrone. Mr. Perrone has been a member of our Board of Directors since September 26, 2002, and a member of our Audit Committee since June 24, 2005, where he currently holds the position of President.2005. He was our Infrastructure and Energy Executive Officer from July 10, 2002, to October 2, 2002. Over the past five years, he served as member of the Board of Directors of Profarma - Pharmaceuticals DistributorDistribuidora de Fármacos S.A., acting as Chairman, member of the Board of Directors of João Fortes Engenharia S.A., and member of the Management Board of Energia Sustentável S.A., Libra Aeroportos – Aeroporto de Cabo Frio and FTL – Ferrovia Transnordestina Logística S.A. (controlled by CSN). He also serves as an independent consultant in the infrastructure area. Mr. Perrone graduated in Business from a program sponsored by "Chimica" Bayer S.A., holds a Law degree from Universidade Federal Fluminense – UFF/RJ and has a graduate degree in Economics in the area of Capital Markets from Fundação Getulio Vargas – FGV/SP. Antonio Francisco dos SantosFabiam Franklin. Mr. SantosFranklin has been a member of our Board of Directors since December 23, 1997, and a memberApril 28, 2016. Since April 4, 2016 he has been serving as Chairman of our Audit Committee since April 27, 2012. He is currently Chairman and Chief Executive Officerthe Advisory Council of CSN’s EmployeeStock Investment ClubFund (ClubeCSN Invest Fundo de Investimento CSNInvestimentos em Ações). Over the past five years he served as Planning and Support Officer of CSN, and Coordinator and Chief of Industrial Engineering, Chief of Production Planning andis a member of the Board of Directors of the Caixa Beneficente dos EmpregadosBrazilian Association of Metallurgy and Mining (Associação Brasileira de Matelurgia, Materiais e Mineração) since April 2015. He also serves as General Mannager of Blast Furnaces at CSN or CBS, our pension plan.since 2002. Mr. SantosFranklin graduated in BusinessMetallurgical Engineering and holds a graduate degree in Organization and Finance, bothReduction Metallurgy, from the Coordination of Graduate Studies and Research - CECOP,–Mc Master University, Hamilton, Canada, and an MBA in Industrial Strategy and Business Management from Universidade Federal FluminenseFundação Dom Cabral – UFF/RJ.Belo Horizonte/MG.
Table Of Contents
Yoshiaki Nakano. Mr. Nakano has been a member of our Board of Directors since April 29, 2004, and a member of our Audit Committee since June 24, 2005. OverHe also serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Transnordestina Logística S.A. (company joint controlled by CSN) and, over the past five years, Mr. Nakano has been a professor and Officer at the School of Economics of Fundação GetulioGetúlio Vargas – FGV/SP, a member of the Economy Superior Council (Conselho Superior de Economia - COSEC) of FIESP/Instituto Roberto Simonsen, and a board member of the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo – FAPESP, a member of the Conselho Superior de Economia (COSEC) of FIESP/Instituto Roberto Simonsen, and a member of the Consulting Board of the Grupo Pão de Açúcar.until 2015. Previously, Mr. Nakano served as Special Secretary for Economic Affairs in the Ministry of Finance and as Finance Secretary of the State of São Paulo. Mr. Nakano graduated in Business Administration from Fundação Getulio Vargas and has an MBA and a Ph.D. from Cornell University, USA. Antonio Bernardo Vieira Maia.Mr. Maia was elected member of our Board of Directors on April 30, 2013.2013 and a member of our Audit Committee since August 08, 2013, serving as Chairman of the Audit Committee since May 06, 2014, and of the Financial Committee since October 07, 2014. He is also CEO of BRG Capital Ltda. since July, 2005.2005 and member of the Board of Directors of Transnordestina Logística S.A. (company joint controlled by CSN) and of FTL – Ferrovia Transnordestina Logística S.A. (controlled by CSN). From April, 1995 to May, 2005 he was Officer of Credit Suisse / Suisse/Banco Garantia de Investimentos S.A.. He began his career in Citibank Brazil, as an interna trainee, in 1982 and moved to New York in 1986, where he actedfirst worked as an Institutional Investment Analyst of Citigroup infor Latin America, until become an Office. Prior to that, he becameworked as an Officer of Citigroup. He was associate of Banco Bozano Simonsen de Investimentos in Rio from August 1979 to December 1981, and he served as amember of the Board of Directors of Banque Bénédict Hentsch & Cie SA, , Geneva, Switzerland, from April to December 2005.2006. He graduated in 1981 in Business and Public Administration from the Fundação Getulio Vargas.Vargas. Aloysio Meirelles de Miranda Filho.Léo Steinbruch:Mr. Miranda Filho was electedSteinbruchhas been member of ourthe Company’s Board of Directors onsince April 30, 2013.28, 2015 and is also member of the Board of Directors of Elizabeth S.A. Indústria Têxtil, Vicunha Aços S.A., Vicunha Participações S.A., Vicunha Steel S.A. and Textília S.A.. He is also a memberan Executive Officer at CFL Participações S.A. and at Taquari Participações S.A., and administrator of Fazenda Santa Otília Agropecuária Ltda. (all these companies are part of the Ulhôa Canto Advogados Associados office since 1982, becoming Advisor Partner in 1989. Mr. Miranda Filho participates in the Deliberative Councilcontrolling group of the Instituto Fernando Henrique Cardoso, memberCSN).
Table of the board of the Instituto de Gestão Educacional of the Fundação Lemann and of the Consultive Council of the Instituto Empreender Endeavor. Mr. Miranda Filho graduated in the Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro – UERJ in 1984.contents Board of Executive Officers In addition to Mr. Steinbruch, the following people were members of our Board of Executive Officers as of the date of this annual report: Enéas Garcia Diniz. Mr. Diniz holds the position of Executive Officer in charge of the production areasteel, cement, energy and environmental operational areas since June 21, 2005. He has been serving CSN since 1985, previously acting as General Manager of Hot Rolling, General Manager of Maintenance, Metallurgy Officer and General Officer of the Presidente Vargas Steelworks.Steelworks and Director of Nacional Minérios S.A. (Nacional Minérios S.A. ceased to exist on December 31, 2015). Mr. Diniz is also currently President of the Board of Directors of Transnordestina Logística S.A., a member of the Board of Directors and Officer of Companhia Metalúrgica Prada and Cia. Metalic Nordeste, a member of the Board of Directors of NacionalArvedi Metalfer do Brasil S.A., Cia. Metalic Nordeste, Companhia Metalúrgica Prada, Congonhas Minérios S.A., Itá Energia S.A., Sepetiba Tecon S.A. and Lusosider – Aços PlanosPlano S.A., (all companies controlled by us or with equity interrest of CSN). He is also currently serving as Officer of Cia. Metalic Nordeste, Companhia Florestal do Brasil, Companhia Metalúrgica Prada, CSN CimentosEnergia S.A., Estanho Rondônia S.A., Itá Energática S.A., Minérios Nacional S.A. and Stahlwerk Thüringen GmbH (all companies controlled by us or with equity interrest of CSN, Energiahaving Nacional Minérios S.A. ceased to exist on December 31, 2015) and a member of the Deliberative Council of Caixa Beneficente dos Empregados da Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional – CBS.Fundação CSN. Mr. Diniz graduated in Mechanical Engineering from Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro - PUC / RJ, further specialized in Business Management from Universidade Federal Fluminense - UFF/RJ and has an MBA from the Fundaçăo Dom Cabral Business School of Belo Horizonte. José Taragano.Mr. Taragano was elected Executive Officer on December 15, 2009, being in charge of the projects area. He is currently a member of the Board of Directors and Executive Officer of Cia Metalic Nordeste, a member of the Board of Directors of Companhia Metalúrgica Prada and of Nacional Minérios S.A., and Executive Officer of Estanho de Rondônia S.A. – ERSA.He previously served as COO - Executive VP of Operations of Brenco – Companhia Brasileira de Energia Renovável, Executive and Business Officer of Klabin S.A., Environment, Health & Safety Worldwide Officer of Alcoa Inc. in New York, Officer of Primary Products/Aluminum, Alumina & Chemical Products, Officer of Quality and Human Resources and Superintendent of Production of Alcoa Latin America in São Paulo, Chairman of CEMPRE – Compromisso Empresarial para a Reciclagem, member of the Healthy People 2010 Business Advisory Committee in Washington and acted as Independent Director at the Board of ECOSORB. Mr. Taragano graduated in Metallurgical Engineering from Pontifícia Universidade Católica of Rio de Janeiro - PUC-RJ, has an MBA in Marketing from the Fundação Instituto de Administração of Universidade de São Paulo / FIA-USP and further education at MIT / Sloan Executive Program and Harvard Business School / Finance for Senior Executives.
David Moise Salama.Mr. Salama was elected Executive Officer on August 2, 2011, being in charge of the investor relations area.real estate, insurance and credit areas. He has been serving CSN since 2006, having previously acted as Investor Relations Manager.Manager until August 2011 and as Investor Relations Executive Director from August 2011 until May 2015. He is also currently serving as Executive Officer of Estanho de Rondônia S.A. and member of the Board of Directors of Cia. Metalic Nordeste, Companhia Florestal do Brasil, Congonhas Minérios and Sepetiba Tecon S.A. (all companies controlled by CSN), and also a deputy member of the Deliberative Council of Caixa Beneficente dos Empregados of CSN, Cimentos, S.A.or CBS. Prior to joining CSN, Mr. Salama acted as Financial Controller Officer at Tecnisa Engenharia e Comércio, Birmann Comércio e Empreendimentos and Goldfarb Comércio e Construções, was the head of consolidated financial information of Unilever Brasil and acted as senior auditor at PricewaterhouseCoopers. He is a member of the National Investor Relations Institute and of the Brazilian Institute of Investor Relations.PwC. Mr. Salama graduated in Accounting and has an MBA in Finance, both from the School of Economics, Business and Accounting of the Universidade de São Paulo / FEA-USP. He complemented his academic education by attending the Oxford Advanced Management andLeadership Program of Saïd Business School at Oxford University, England, and the Program on Negotiation of Harvard Law School at Harvard University, United States.
Table Of Contents
Luis Fernando Barbosa Martinez.Mr. Martinez was elected Executive Officer on August 2, 2011, being in charge of the commercial and logistic areas of the steel, products commercial area.cement and special sales segment. He has been serving CSN since 2002, having previously acted as Sales Officer.Officer and Director of Nacional Minérios S.A. (Nacional Minérios S.A. ceased to exist on December 31, 2015). Mr. Martinez is also President of the Brazilian Association of Steel Packaging – ABEAÇO Officer of Cia. Metalic Nordeste, CSN Energia, S.A. and CSN Cimentos, S.A., member of the Board of Directors of Associação Brasileira de Metalurgia, MateriaiseMateriais e Mineração, – ABMor ABM. He is also currently serving as Officer of Cia. Metalic Nordeste, Congonhas Minérios S.A., Estanho de Rondônia S.A., Mineração Nacional S.A., CSN Energia, S.A. and an alternateStahlwerk Thüringen GmbH, , and member of the Board of Directors of NacionalCongonhas Minérios S.A., Companhia Florestal do Brasil, Companhia Metalúrgica Prada (all companies controlled by us) and MRS Logística S.A. (company joint controlled by us) and and member of the Deliberative Council of Caixa Beneficente dos Empregados da Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional, or CBS. Prior to joining CSN, Mr. Martinez was a Sales Officer at Alcan Alumínio do Brasil S.A., having worked in such company for 14 years in different departments (processing, quality, product/market development and sales). He also acted as Executive Officer of the Brazilian Center of Steel Construction - CBCA and of the Brazilian Association of Metallic Construction, -or ABCEM. Mr. Martinez graduated in Metallurgical Engineering from Instituto Mauá de Tecnologia, –or IMT, has a graduate degree in Industrial Management from the School of Production Engineering of the Universidade de São Paulo, and also graduated from the Corporate Management Development Program at Alcan Aluminum Limited, Montreal, Canadá.Canada. Juarez Saliba de AvelarPaulo Rogério Caffarelli. Mr. Avelar was electedCaffarelli has been the Executive Officer on October 26, 2011responsible for the Company’s corporate areas since March 10, 2015 and is in chargefor the investor relations area since March 1,2016. He has been a member of the new businesses area. Mr. Avelar previously worked at CSN from 2003 to 2010, having acted as Ports and Railroads Officer, Mining Officer, Mineral Resources Officer and New Businesses Officer. Prior to 2003, Mr. Avelar was the President of Ferteco Mineração, Officer of the Southern and Northern Systems of Vale S.A. and, from January 2010 to August 2011, acted as Chief Executive Officer of Steel do Brasil Participações S.A. Mr. Avelar is also a Director of Transnordestina Logística S.A. Mr. Avelar graduated in Mining Engineering from Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG.
Tufi Daher Filho. Mr. Daher Filho was elected Executive Officer on October 04, 2012. He is currently theBanco Votorantim since 2009, Chairman of the Board of Directors of MRS Logística, S.A.Brasilcap Capitalização since 2010 and adeputy member of the Board of Directors of Transnordestina Logística S.A. (joint controlled by us). He worked for more than 30 years at Banco do Brasil, in the last five years of which in the following areas: wholesale, international business, private bank, capital market, insurance, private pension plans, capitalization, credit cards and individual loans. In the last five years, he was Executive Secretary of the Ministry of Finance, between 2014 and 2015, an alternate member of the Advisory Board of the Deposit Insurance Fund (FGC) between 2013 and 2014, CEO of BB Banco de Investimentos (BB-BI) and BB Leasing between 2012 and 2014, and a member of the Board of Directors of Vale S.A., between 2014 and the beginning of 2015, BB Gestão de Recursos (BB DTVM) between 2010 and 2014, BB Mapfre SH1 Participações, between 2011 and 2012, and Mapfre BB SH2 Participações, between 2011 and 2012, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Brasilprev, between 2009 and 2012, IRB Brasil Resseguros, between 2010 and 2012 and CBSS Visavale (Alelo), between 2010 and 2012, Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of Visanet (Cielo), between 2009 and 2012, President of Fenacap – National Capitalization Federation, between 2011 and 2012, BB Seguros Participações, between 2009 and 2012, BB Administradora de Cartões de Crédito, between 2009 and 2012, BB ELO Participações, between 2010 and 2012, and ABECS – Brazilian Association of Credit Card and Service Companies, between 2009 and 2012, Vice President of CNseg – National Confederation of Insurance Companies, between 2011 and 2012, a member of the Self-Regulating Board of Febraban – Brazilian Federation of Banks, between 2010 and 2011, a member of the Advisory Board of BBTUR, between 2009 and 2011, and a member of the Fiscal Council of Neoenergia between 2009 and 2010. Mr. Daher Filho previously served as ChiefCaffarelli has a degree in Law from the Pontifical Catholic University of Curitiba, an MBA in Corporate Law and Finance from the Getulio Vargas Foundation (FGV), and has completed specialization courses in Foreign Trade at the FAE/CDE Business School in Curitiba, and in International Trade Law at IBEJ Curitiba. He also has a Master’s degree in Business Administration and Economics from the University of Brasília.
Table of contents Fábio Eduardo De Pieri Spina.Mr. Spina was elected Executive Officer on September 17, 2015, and is in charge of Transnordestina Logística,the legal area. During the last few years Mr. Spina acted as the Vice-President Legal Corporate Finance of The Kraft Heinz Company, during 2014 and 2015, having also acted as Latin America General Counsel and Global Head of Ethics & Compliance. Mr. Spina acted as an Officer at AGN Participações and Director of AGNs’ subsidiaries from 2012 until 2014. From 2009 until 2011, he acted as Global General Counsel and Corporate Affairs Officer at Vale S.A. and acted as Vice-President of Investor Relations of Anheuser-Busch Inbev during 2008 and 2009. Mr. Spina was also a teacher at INSPER and acted as a member of the INSPER Legal Consulting Board, Executive Vice-President of the Brasil-China Economic Council, a member of the board of IBRAM (Brazilian Mining Institute), a Board member of the Centre for Sustainable Development Vale-Columbia University, a member of the Consulting Board of Fundação Getúlio Vargas – FGV and member of the Board of Instituto Millenium. Mr. Spina graduated in law at the University of São Paulo Law School (São Paulo, Brazil - 1994) and possesses an L.L.M. from Columbia University School of Law (NY, US – 1997), and an MBA from INSEAD/Wharton (Fontainebleau, France - 2002). Pedro Gutemberg Quariguasi Netto. Mr. Quariguasi was elected Executive Officer on May 11, 2016, and is in charge of the strategic businesses area. During the last five years, Mr.Quariguasi acted as CEO of Vale at Moçambique and as Global Officer of Coal of Vale at Australia from March 2007 to October, 2012. From January, 2000 to June, 2006,2014 until April 2016, and as Partner and Commercial and Marketing Officer at B&A Mineração from May 2012 until September 2013. Mr. Daher Filho worked at Telemar Group as Superintendent responsible for the Amazonas and Roraima branches, Officer of Customer Services responsible for Ceará, Superintendent Officer responsible for Pernambuco, Superintendent Officer responsible forGuariguasi has a degree in Metallurgical Engineering from Universidade Federal Fluminense, a Master degree in Metallurgical Engineering from Pontificia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Officer responsible for the Southeast Region, and Operations Officer responsible for Brazil. He also acted as leader of Operations and Maintenance of Fixed and Mobile Telephony of Telemar Group beginninga PhD in July, 2004. In addition, he acted as Business Manager at Rede Ferroviária Federal S.A. (RFFSA) and Ferrovia Centro Atlântica (FCA), and Manager of Operations in Companhia Brasileira de Trens Urbanos – CBTU. He graduated in CivilMetallurgical Engineering from Universidade Católica de Minas GeraisMcGill University, Canada, and an MBA in Transportation PlanningFinance, Corporate Strategy and Economy from the Japan International Cooperation Agency, Japan. He has a Corporate MBA degree from Fundação Dom Cabral and graduated in the Advanced Management Program of the European Institute of Business Administration - Insead, France.McKinsey & Company. Mr. Benjamin Steinbruch and Mr. Léo Steinbruch are cousins. There are no other family relationships between any of the persons named above.The address for all of our directors and executive officers is Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 3400, 20thfloor, Itaim Bibi, city of São Paulo, State of São Paulo, Brazil (telephone number 55-11-3049-7100). Indemnification of Officers and Directors There is no provision for or prohibition against the indemnification of officers and directors in Brazilian law or in our bylaws. Officers are generally not individually liable for acts performed within the course of their duties. We either indemnify or maintain directors’ and officers’ liability insurance insuring our Directors, our Executive Officers and certain key employees against liabilities incurred in connection with their respective positions with us. 6B. Compensation For the year ended December 31, 2012,2015, the aggregate compensation paid by us to all members of our Board of Directors and the members of our Board of Executive Officers for services in all capacities was R$30.7 47.9 million, which includes salaries, bonuses, profit sharing arrangements and benefits, such as medical assistance, pension plan and life insurance, among others. See “—Item 6D. Employees” for a brief description of our profit sharing arrangements.
Table Of Contents
We are the principal sponsor of CBS, our employee pension plan. CBS had an excess of plan assets over pension benefit obligations of R$257 million in 2012. The fair value of the plan assets of CBS, totaled R$2,923 million as of December 31, 2012, and projected benefit obligations were R$2,666 million. See Note 28 to our consolidated financial statements contained in “Item 18. Financial Statements.”
6C. Board Practices Fiscal Committee and Audit Committee
Table of contents Under Brazilian Corporate Law, shareholders may request the appointment of a Fiscal Committee (Conselho Fiscal), which is a corporate body independent of management and our external auditors. The primary responsibility of the Fiscal Committee is to monitor management’s activities, review the financial statements, and report its findings to the shareholders. Currently, we do not have a Fiscal Committee in place. In June 2005, an Audit Committee (Comitê de Auditoria) was appointed in compliance with SEC’s rules, which is composed of independent members of our Board of Directors. The Audit Committee is responsible for recommending to the Board of Directors the appointment of the independent auditors, reporting on our auditing policies and our annual audit plan prepared by our internal auditing team, as well as monitoring and evaluating the activities of the external auditors. Our Audit Committee has also been tasked with identifying, prioritizing and submitting actions to be implemented by our Executive Officers, analyzing our annual report and our financial statements, and making recommendations to our Board of Directors. The Audit Committee is currently composed of Mr. Fernando Perrone, Mr. Yoshiaki Nakano and Mr. Antonio Francisco dos SantosBernardo Vieira Maia and is constantly assisted by an outside consultant. For information on the date of election and term of office of the members of our Board of Directors and Board of Executive Officers, see “Item 6A. Directors and Senior Management.” Service Contracts We permit our directors to continue to participate in our employee pension plan after ceasing to be a director of our Company. 6D. Employees As of December 31, 2010, 20112013, 2014 and 2012,2015, we had 19,217, 20,79121,962 and 21,23222,801 and 23,736 employees, respectively. As of December 31, 2012,2015, approximately 3,5403,500 of our employees were members of the Steelworkers’ Union of Volta Redonda and region, which is affiliated with the Força Sindical since 2012, a national union. We believe we have a good relationship with Força Sindical. We have collective bargaining agreements, renewable annually on May 1st of every year. Moreover, we have members affiliated with other unions, such as the Engineers’ Union with 3719 members, the Accountants’ Union with 72 members and the Workers’ Unions from Arcos, Casa de Pedra, Camaçari, Recife and Araucária, with a total of 332258 members. At all other companies controlled by CSN, such as Prada, ERSA, NamisaNamisa/Congonhas Minérios and Transnordestina, we have a total of 1,3081,550 members. In March 1997, we established an employee profit sharing plan. All employees participate in the plan, and earn bonuses based on our reaching certain goals for each year, including a minimum EBITDA margin, as well as other measures such as sales, cost control, productivity and inventory levels, as appropriate for each sector based on its nature. The Company is the main sponsor of this non-profit entity established in July 1960, primarily engaged in the payment of benefits that supplement the official government Social Security benefits to participants. In its capacity as sponsor, CSN carries out transactions involving the payment of contributions and recognition of actuarial liabilities calculated in defined benefit plans. See further details in Note 27 to our consolidated financial statements contained in “Item 18. Financial Statements.” 6E. Share Ownership The Steinbruch family, which includes Mr. Benjamin Steinbruch, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer holds an indirect majority ownership interest in Vicunha SiderurgiaAços S.A. and Rio Iaco Participações S.A., our controlling shareholders. All of our Executive Officers and members of our Board of Directors held an aggregate of 5,55890,550 shares of our outstanding common shares as of December 31, 2012.2015.
Table Of Contentsof contents Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions 7A. Major Shareholders On December 31, 2012,2015, our capital stock was composed of 1,457,970,1081,387,524,047 common shares. Our capital stock is entirely composed of common shares and each common share entitles the holder to one vote at our shareholders’ meetings. The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2012,2015, the number of our common shares owned by all persons known to us that own more than 5% of our outstanding common shares as of such date:major shareholders: | | Common Shares | | | | | | | | Percent of | | | Shares Owned | | Outstanding | Name of Person or Group | | | | Shares | | Vicunha Siderurgia S.A.(1) | | 697,719,990 | | 47.86% | Rio Iaco Participações S.A.(1) | | 58,193,503 | | 3.99% |
(1)
| Owned indirectly by the Steinbruch family, which includes Mr. Benjamin Steinbruch, Chairman of our Board of Directors and CEO, as well as other members of his family.
|
| | Common Shares | | | | | | Name of Person or Group | | Shares Owned | | Percent of Outstanding Shares | | Vicunha Aços S.A.(1) | | 697,719,990 | | 50.29% | Rio Iaco Participações S.A.(1) | | 58,193,503 | | 4.19% | | | | | | (1) Owned indirectly by the Steinbruch family, which includes Mr. Benjamin Steinbruch, Chairman of our Board of Directors and CEO, as well as other members of his family. |
7B. Related Party Transactions From time to time we conduct
The Company’s transactions with companies directly or indirectly owned byrelated parties consists of (i) transactions with our principal shareholders or members ofholding companies; (ii) transactions with subsidiaries, jointly controlled entities, associates, exclusive funds and other related parties; and (iii) other unconsolidated related parties, which are detailed in Note 19 to our Board of Directors. See “Item 4. Information on the Company – A. History and Development of the Company,” “Item 4B. Business Overview,” “Item 4D. Property, Plant and Equipment – Acquisitions and Dispositions”, “Item 6A. Directors and Senior Management”, “Item 7A. Major Shareholders” and Note 18 to the consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements included in “Item 18. Financial Statements.”Statements”. i.Vicunha Siderurgia S.A is a holding company set up for the purpose of holding equity interests in other companies and is the Company’s main shareholder, holding 51.41% of CSN´s voting shares. Rio Iaco Participações S.A is also a holding company and holds 4.29% of CSN´s voting capital. ii.Our commercial and financial transactions with our subsidiaries, jointly controlled entities, associates, exclusive funds and other related parties are carried out at normal market prices and conditions, based on usual terms and rates applicable to third parties. The Company presents details of suchtransactions in Note 19, item b) of our Consolidated Financial Statements. iii The Company mantain relations with other unconsolidated related parties as CBS Previdência, Fundação CSN, Banco Fibra, Ibis Participações e Serviços Ltda and Companhia de Gás do Ceará
Table of contents Item 8. Financial Information 8A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information See “Item 3. Key Information—Selected Financial Data” and “Item 18. Financial Statements” for our consolidated financial statements. Legal Proceedings In the ordinary course of our business, we are party to several proceedings, both administrative and judicial, which we believe are incidental and arise out of our regular course of business. We believe that the outcome of the proceedings to which we are currently a party will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. We have established provisions for all amounts in dispute that represent a probable loss based on the legal opinion of our internal and external legal counsels. Labor Contingencies As of December 31, 2012,2015, the Company and its subsidiaries arewere defendants in 12,0807,532 labor claims, for which a provision has been recorded in the amount of R$246 479 million. Most of the claims are relatedrelate to alleged subsidiary and/or joint liability between us andwith respect to our independent contractors, wagesalary equalization, health hazard premiums and hazardous duty premiums, overtime pay, differences ofin the 40% fine on the FGTSseverance pay fund (FGTS) deposits regarding pre-retirement periodsresulting from past federal government economic plans, and due to inflation purge, additional payments for unhealthyindemnity claims resulting from alleged occupational diseases or on-the-job accidents, breaks between working hours, and hazardous activities, overtime anddifferences in profit sharing differences from 1997 to 1999 and from 2001 to 2003. Civil Contingencies These are mainly claims for indemnities within the civil judicial processes in which we are involved. Such proceedings result, in general, resultfrom contractual disputes and collection of occupational accidents, diseasesvalues, claims for damages and contractual disputescompensations related to our commercial and industrialactivities. activities, real estate disputes and disputes aiming at restoring health insurance. As of December 31, 2012,2015, the amount relating to probable losses for these contingencies was R$110 128 million.
Table Of Contents
We also classify as civil contingencies the administrative and judicial proceedings filed against us for alleged violation of environmental statutes, mainly as a result of our industrial activities, claims for regularization, indemnification or imposition of fines. As of December 31, 2012,2015, the amount relating to probable losses for civil contingencies relating to environmental issues was R$7 18 million. Tax Contingencies Among our tax contingencies, there are charges for alleged non-payment of income tax and social contribution taxes in Brazil, for which a provision of R$321214 million has been recorded in 2012.2015. RefisREFIS I, REFIS II and Advance Tax Payment Program
In November 2009, we adhered to the Tax Recovery Program (REFIS)REFIS I, a special settlement and installment payment program established by the Federal Government, in order to settle certain of our tax and social security liabilities throughdue until November 2008. Law No. 12,865, dated October 9, 2013, later extended the original deadline of the REFIS I (originally November 2009) to December 2013 and allowed the submission of additional tax and social security liabilities under the program. In November 2013, we adhered to the Tax Recovery Program for Profits of Foreign Subsidiaries, or REFIS II, a special settlement and installment payment system. Management’sprogram established by the Federal Government, to settle the Income Tax (IRPJ) and the Social Contribution on Net Income (CSLL) arising from the taxation of profits of foreign subsidiaries. We submitted to the REFIS II the outstanding debts related to the 2004-2009 fiscal years.
Table of contents Our decision to join both the REFIS I and the REFIS II took into consideration the economic benefits provided by the REFIS,such settlement programs, such as discounts in the amounts of fines, interest and fines exemptions,legal charges due, as well as the high costs of maintaining pending lawsuits. Joining In November 2014, we adhered to the Advance Tax Payment Program established by the Federal Government under Law 13.043/2014, which allowed settlement of active federal debts, including the debts that were covered by the REFIS allows us to pay a reduced amountI and REFIS II programs mentioned above, through an advance payment of 30% of the fines, interesttotal amount due in cash and legal charges that were previously due.the offset of the remaining amount due with tax losses. The total amount included in the program was R$1.603 million, resulting in an impact to the cash account of R$ 502 million and a positive result of R$ 79 million in our income statements. We are currently waiting for a formal notification to be issued by the Federal Revenue to consolidate the Tax Payment Program. As of December 31, 2015, we started to consolidate Congonhas Minérios as successor of Namisa in our results and financial reports, including its settlement and installment payment programs. In November 2013, Namisa adhered to the Tax Recovery Program for Profits of Foreign Subsidiaries, or REFIS II, established by the Federal Government to settle the Income Tax (IRPJ) and the Social Contribution on Net Income (CSLL), arising from the taxation of profits of foreign subsidiaries. Namisa did not adhere to the Advance Tax Payment Program. On December 31, 2012,2015, the position of theCongonha´s debt under the REFIS recorded under taxes payableII was R$ 62 million. For more information, see Note 16 – Taxes Installments - to the consolidated financial statements included in installments, was R$1,119 million (R$2,095 million in 2011)“Item 14.a). Financial Statements”. Antitrust In October 1999, CADE fined us, claiming that certain practices adopted by us and other Brazilian steel companies up to 1997 allegedly comprised a cartel. We challenged the cartel allegation and the imposition of the fine judicially and, on June 2003, obtained a partially favorable judgment by a federal trial court. CADE appealed the trial court decision and, onin June 2010, a federal appellate court in Brasília held a judgment reversing the trial court’s decision and confirming the cartel allegation, as well as the fine imposed by CADE in the amount of R$65 million. We appealed the decision of the appellate court to the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice. We have not yet recorded any provision in connection with this fine. In September 2011, we received a request from Secretaria de Direito Econômico (SDE)the SDE to provide information related to the acquisition of shares of Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais S.A. –, or Usiminas, in orderwhich later evolved to evaluatethe analysis by CADE of a possible concentration act.Inact. In October 2011, SDE involved the Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE)CADE and the Secretaria de Acompanhamento Econômico (SEAE)SEAE on the subject.We have been providingsubject and we provided the requested information to suchthese antitrust bodies. In April and July, 2012, CADE issued certain injunctive orders limiting our ability to, among other things, acquire moreincrease our equity stake in Usiminas shares or exercise our voting rights onwith the shares we already own. We On April 10, 2014 CADE issued its decision on the matter, and a Performance Commitment Agreement (Termo de Compromisso de Desempenho), or TCD, was executed by CADE and CSN. Under the terms of CADE’s decision and the TCD, CSN shall reduce its equity stake in Usiminas, within a specified timeframe. The timeframe and reduction percentages are confidential. Furthermore, our political rights in Usiminas will continue to be suspended until we reach the thresholds established in the TCD. On March 24, 2016, we applied to CADE to partially suspend the TCD so that we are able to exercise certain political rights, namely that of appointing independent directors and members of the fiscal committee. On April 27, 2016 CADE granted our request, and on April 28, 2016, at USIMINAS’Annual General Meeting, we appointed two (2) independent directors and one (1) independent member of the fiscal committee of Usiminas, and their respective alternates. The election of Usiminas’ Board and Fiscal Committee members by CSN, as well as all meetings of the Board of Directors of Usiminas, are currently discussing with CADE alternatives to preserve our rightssuspended as a result of judicial decisions issued by the State Court of Minas Gerais and protect our financial investment. the Federal Court of the Federal District, respectively. CSN has appealed the decision issued by the State Court of Minas Gerais on May 13, 2016. Other Legal Proceedings The Company and its subsidiariesWe are defendants in other proceedings at administrative and judicial levels, in the approximate amount of R$14,63121,541 million as of December 31, 2015 (R$15,430 million as of December 31, 2014), of which R$12,849 19,024 million relate to tax contingencies as of December 31, 2015 (R$13,799 million as ofDecember 31, 2014), R$615834 million to civil contingencies R$1,137as of December 31, 2015 (R$446 million as of December 31, 2014), R$1,033 millionto labor contingencies and social security contingencies as of December 31, 2015 (R$1,070 million as of December 31, 2014) and R$30359 million to environmental contingencies.contingencies as of December 31, 2015 (R$115 million as of December 31, 2014). The assessments made by legal counsel define these contingencies as entailing a risk of possible loss and, therefore, no provision has been recorded. Contingencies related to each of our subsidiaries are included proportionally to the percentage of these subsidiaries that we consolidate in our financial statements.
Our tax contingencies are as follows:
Table Of Contentsof contents a)R$1,814 million refers toOur main tax assessment notices issued against the Company for the alleged non-taxation of profits earned on the balances of its foreign subsidiaries for purposes of Income Tax (IRPJ) and Social Contribution on Net Income (CSLL);
b)R$154 million refers to tax assessment notices issued against our investee Namisa also for the alleged non-taxation of profits earned on the balances of its foreign subsidiary for purposes of Income Tax (IRPJ) and Social Contribution on Net Income (CSLL). The total amount of this assessment notice is R$256 million, but as we only consolidate our 60% interest in Namisa, we include only 60% of this amount in our contingencies;
c)R$6,079 million referscontingency relates to a R$ 7,743 million tax assessment notice issued against the Company for having allegedly failed to submit to taxation the capital gain resulting from the alleged sale of 40% of the shares of its subsidiary Namisa to the Asian consortium;
d)R$1,048 million refersConsortium. On May 2013, the São Paulo Regional Judgment Office (lower administrative court) issued a decision favorable to aus and cancelled the tax assessment notice. Such decision was partially reviewed by the Administrative Board of Tax Appeals (CARF) and the tax assessment notice was partially reinstated. CSN and the Bureau of Federal Public Attorneys filed administrative appeals against CARF’s decision and we are currently waiting for the analysis by the Superior Council of Tax Appeals (Conselho Superior de Recursos Fiscais).
The same tax assessment notice informed above resulted on other contingency issued against Namisa (merged in December 31, 2015 by our investee Namisasubsidiary Congonhas Minérios), in connection with its alleged improper use of the goodwill resulting from the investment made by the Asian consortium in Namisa’s direct controlling entity, which was later merged into Namisa. Thea total amount of thisR$2,250 million. This tax assessment demands the payment of income tax and social contribution not paid in view of the alleged improper goodwill amortization from 2008 to 2011. On May 2013, the São Paulo Regional Judgment Office (Delegacia Regional de Julgamento), the lower administrative court, issued a decision favorable to Namisa and cancelled the tax assessment notice. Such decision was maintained by CARF and we are currently waiting for the analysis by the Superior Council of Tax Appeals (Conselho Superior de Recursos Fiscais) of the special appeal filed by the Bureau of Federal Public Attorneys. In December 2015, CSN received a new tax assessment notice, is R$1,747 million, but as we only consolidate our 60% interest in Namisa, we include only 60% of this amount in our contingencies; and e)R$3,754 million refers to other taxes (local, state and federal taxes) and social security contingencies, which includes our own contingencies and those related to our subsidiaries, proportionally to the percentage of those subsidiaries that we consolidate in our financial statements.
The Company was also a defendant in an arbitration proceeding at the International Court of Arbitration - ICC that discussed potential damages suffered by the plaintiff due to a breach of contract in the estimatedtotal amount of R$84 million. The parties settled 1.087 million for having allegedly improperly deducted interest expenses agreed in the case overpre-payment contracts between CSN and Namisa. We filed our defense before the course of 2012São Paulo Regional Judgement Office (Delegacia Regional de Julgamento) and it is currently closed.are waiting for a decision to be issued.
In July 2012, the Ministéenvironmental public prosecutor of the State of Rio de Janeiro (Ministério Público Estadual do Rio de Janeiro (Environmental Public Prosecutor of the State of Rio de Janeiro) filed a judicial proceeding against us claiming that we must (i) remove all waste disposed in two areas used as an industrial waste disposal sitelandfill in the city of Volta Redonda and (ii) relocate 750 residences located in the adjacent neighborhood Volta Grande IV Residential, also in the city of Volta Redonda. This case is classified as havingThe court denied these requests but ordered that we present a timetable to investigate the area and, if necessary, to remediate the potential issues raised by the public prosecutor. We presented a timetable considering the conclusion of all studies related to investigation phases, including the risk of probable loss, but weassessment and intervention plan, which were concluded in April 30, 2014. We presented the studies resulting from our investigation to INEA and are awaiting for their response. We have not yet recorded any provision since, at this moment, it is not possible to quantify the amounts involved in the case. In 2012, wealso received notices for lawsuits brought by certain home owners at Volta Grande IV Residential claiming indemnification for alleged moral and material damages. At this point, it is not possible to quantify the amounts involved in this claim. Such lawsuits are classified as having a risk of possible loss and, therefore, we recorded no provision.
On April 8, 2013, the Rio de Janeiro State environmental authority (Instituto Estadual do Ambiente), or INEA fined us in the amount of R$35 million in connection with the matters involving Volta Grande IV Residential and requested that we perform the same actions already under discussion in the July 2012 public prosecutor lawsuit. We planIn January 2014 we filed a lawsuit seeking to disputereverse this fine and are awaiting for the other requests madeINEA to file its response. In August 2013, the federal environmental public prosecutor (Ministério Público Federal) filed a judicial civil proceeding against us with the same claims requested on the lawsuit brought by INEA.the environmental public prosecutor of the State of Rio de Janeiro, described above. After that, in May 2014, the state of Rio de Janeiro (INEA) filed a lawsuit to execute the debt. We are currently challenging both proceedings but no final decision on this matter has been issued to date. As a result of the accident involving a Brazilian mining company in November 2015, the State of Minas Gerais filed judicial proceedings against several companies in the mining segment, based on the information disclosed in 2014 on the Environmental Statement Register. These proceedings question the structures that do not have technical stability guaranteed by an external auditor or which stability was not attested due to a lack of documents or technical data. On March, 2016, CSN was notified about the Public Civil Action filed against it by the State of Minas Gerais and the State Environmental Foundation (FEAM) questioning the stability of CSN’s structure referred to as BAIA 4 – a small structure installed inside the industrial area and used for collection of fine of the ore filtration process. Such proceeding was filed based on outdated information. CSN will present its defense, clarifying the facts and attesting the stability of BAIA 4’s structure, in accordance with the auditor report.
Table of contents Environmental and social contingencies for our logistics facilities and the implementation of the new railroad are being reviewed by the management in accordance with the emergency attendance and the risk management plans established in 2014. For further information on our legal proceedings and contingencies, see Notes 1617 and 1718 to our consolidated financial statements. Dividend Policy General Subject to certain exceptions set forth in Brazilian Corporate Law, our bylaws require that we pay a yearly minimum dividend equal to 25% of our adjusted net profits, calculated in accordance with Brazilian Corporate Law. Proposals to declare and pay dividends in excess of the statutory minimum dividend requirement are generally made at the recommendation of our Board of Directors and approved by the vote of our shareholders. Any such proposal will be dependent upon our results of operations, financial condition, cash requirements for our business, futureprospects and other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors. Until December 2000, it had been our policy to pay dividends on our outstanding common shares not less than the amount of our required distributions for any particular fiscal year, subject to a determination by our Board of Directors that such distributions would be inadvisable in view of our financial condition. In December 2000, our Board of Directors decided to adopt a policy of paying dividends equal to all legally available net profits, after taking into consideration the following priorities: (i) our business strategy; (ii) the performance of our obligations; (iii) the accomplishment of our required investments; and (iv) the maintenance of our good financial status.
Table Of Contents
Pursuant to a change in Brazilian tax law effective January 1, 1996, Brazilian companies are also permitted to pay limited amounts of interest on stockholders’Shareholders’ equity to holders of equity securities and to treat these payments as an expense for Brazilian income tax purposes. These payments may be counted in determining if the statutory minimum dividend requirement has been met, subject to shareholder approval. At our Annual Shareholders’ Meeting of April 28, 2016, our shareholders ratified the payment of R$ 275 million as dividends relating to 2015, which were already approved by the Board of Directors Meeting held on March 11, 2015, and paid to the shareholders. For dividends declared during the past four years, see “Item 3A. Selected Financial Data.” At our Annual Shareholders’ Meeting of April 30, 2013, our shareholders approved the payment of R$300 million as dividends and R$560 million as interest on shareholders’ equity relating to 2012.
Amounts Available for Distribution At each Annual Shareholders’ Meeting, our Board of Directors is required to recommend how our earnings for the preceding fiscal year are to be allocated. For purposes of Brazilian Corporate Law, a company’s income net of income tax and social contribution for any one fiscal year, any accumulated losses from prior fiscal years and amounts allocated to employees’ and management’s participation in earnings, represents its “net profits” for that fiscal year. In accordance with Brazilian Corporate Law, shareholders are entitled to receive as a mandatory dividend in each fiscal year, either (i) the portion of the profits as may be stated in the bylaws of the company or, in the event the latter is silent in this regard, (ii) an amount equal to 50% of ourthe net profits as further (i)increased or reduced byby: (a) amounts allocated to the legal reserve; (ii) reduced by(b) amounts allocated to the contingency reserve and the tax incentive reserve, if any; and (iii) increased by the eventual(c) any reversion of any contingency reserves constituted in prior years. The payment of dividends may be limited to the amount of net profits realized during the fiscal year, provided that the difference is recorded as a reserve for unrealized profits. Profits recorded in the reserve for unrealized profits, when realized and not absorbed by losses in subsequent years, willhave to be added to the first dividend declared after their realization. Under our bylaws, we are required to distribute to shareholders as dividends in respect of each fiscal year ending on December 31, to the extent profits are available for distribution, an amount equal to shareholders inat least 25% of our adjusted net profits, which amount shall include any particular year (“Distributable Amount”).interest paid on capital during that year. See “Mandatory Dividends” below.
Table of contents Legal Reserve. Under Brazilian Corporate Law, we are required to maintain a “legal reserve” to which we must allocate 5% of our “net profits” for each fiscal year until the amount of the reserve equals 20% of our paid-in capital. However, we are not required to make any allocations to our legal reserve in a year in which the legal reserve, when added to our other established capital reserves, exceeds 30% of our capital stock. The amounts allocated to such reserve must be approved by our shareholders in the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting, and may be used to increase our capital stock or to offset losses and, therefore, are not available for the payment of dividends. Discretionary (or Statutory) Reserves.Under Brazilian Corporate Law, any corporation may provide in its by-laws for the creation of additional reserves, provided that the maximum amount that may be allocated to such reserves, the purpose of such reserves and the allocation criteria of such reserves are specified. There cannot be any allocation to such reserves if it affects payment of the Mandatory Dividend (as defined below). Our by-laws currently provide that our Board of Directors may propose to our shareholders the deduction of at least 1% from our net profits to be allocated to a Working Capital and Investments Reserve. Constitution of such reserve will not affect payment of the Mandatory Dividend. Our by-laws do not provide for any other discretionary reserve. Contingency Reserve.Under Brazilian Corporate Law, a percentage of our “net profits” may be allocated to a contingency reserve for estimable losses that are considered probable in future years. Any amount so allocated in a prior year must either be reserved in the fiscal year in which the loss had been anticipated if the loss does not occur as projected or be written off in the event that the anticipated loss occurs. Tax Incentive Reserve.Our shareholders in a shareholders’ meeting may, following a management’s proposal, allocate to a tax incentive reserve the portion of our “net profits” resulting from donations or governmental grantsfor investments, which may be excluded from the taxable basis of the Mandatory Dividend. Our by-laws currently do not provide for such reserve.
Table Of Contents
Unrealized Profits Reserve. Under Brazilian Corporate Law, the amount by which the Mandatory Dividend exceeds our realized net profits in a given fiscal year may be allocated to an unrealized profits reserve. Brazilian Corporate Law defines “realized net profits” for the period as the amount by which our “net profits” exceeds the sum of (i) positive equity net results and (ii) the net profits, gains or returns that will be realized after the end of the subsequent fiscal year. “Net profits” allocated to the unrealized profits reserve must be added to the next Mandatory Dividend distribution after those profits have been realized, if they have not been used to absorb losses in subsequent periods. Retained Earnings Reserve. Under Brazilian Corporate Law, our shareholders may decide at a general shareholders’ meeting to retain a portion of our net profits as provided for in a previously approved capital expenditure budget. No allocation of net profits may be made to the retained earnings reserve in case such allocation affects payment of the Mandatory Dividend. The balance of our profit reserves, except those for contingencies, tax incentives and unrealized profits, shall not be greater than our capital stock. If such reserves reach this limit, the manner in which such surplus is used will be decided at a shareholders’ meeting. For purposes of determining reserve amounts, the calculation of “net profits” and allocations to reserves for any fiscal year are determined on the basis of financial statements prepared in accordance with Brazilian Corporate Law. The consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared in accordance with IFRS and, although our allocations to reserves and dividends will be reflected in the financial statements, investors will not be able to calculate the allocations or required dividend amounts from the consolidated financial statements. Capital Reserve.Under Brazilian Corporate Law, the capital reserve consists of premiums from the issuance of shares, goodwill reserves from mergers, sales of founders' shares, and sales of warrants. Amounts allocated to our capital reserve are not taken into consideration for purposes of determining Mandatory Dividends. Our capital stock is not currently represented by founders' shares. In our case, any amounts allocated to the capital reserve may only be used to increase our capital stock, to absorb losses that surpass accumulated profits and profit reserves, or to redeem, reimburse or purchase shares.
Table of contents Mandatory Dividend Under our bylaws, we are required to distribute to shareholders as dividends in respect of each fiscal year ending on December 31, to the extent profits are available for distribution, an amount equal to at least 25% of the Distributable Amountour adjusted profits (the “Mandatory Dividend”) in any particular year, which amount shall include any interest paid on capital during that year. See “Additional Payments on Shareholders’ Equity” below. In addition to the Mandatory Dividend, our Board of Directors may recommend that shareholders receive an additional payment of dividends from other funds legally available. Any payment of interim dividends may be netted against the amount of the Mandatory Dividend for that fiscal year. Under Brazilian Corporate Law, if the Board of Directors determines prior to the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting that payment of the Mandatory Dividend for the preceding fiscal year would be inadvisable in view of our financial condition, the Mandatory Dividend does not need to be paid. That type of determination must be reviewed by the Fiscal Committee, if one exists, and reported, together with the appropriate explanations, to the shareholders and to the CVM. Mandatory dividends not distributed as described above shall be registered as a special reserve and, if not absorbed by losses in subsequent fiscal years, shall be paid as a dividend as soon as our financial condition allows for it. Payment of Dividends We are required to hold Annual Shareholders’ Meetings within the first four months after the end of our fiscal year at which an annual dividend may be declared. Additionally, our Board of Directors may declare interim dividends. Under Brazilian Corporate Law, dividends are generally required to be paid to the holder of record on a dividend declaration date within 60 days following the date the dividend was declared, unless a shareholders’ resolution sets forth another date of payment, which, in either case, must occur prior to the end of the fiscal year in which the dividend was declared. A shareholder has a three-year period from the dividend payment date to claimdividends (or interest on shareholders’ equity as described under “Additional Payments on Shareholders’ Equity” below) in respect of its shares, after which we will no longer be liable for the dividend payments.
Table Of Contents
Our payments of cash distributions on common shares underlying the ADSs will be made in Brazilian currency to our ADR custodian on behalf of our ADR depositary. Our ADR custodian will then convert the proceeds into U.S. dollars and will cause the U.S. dollars to be delivered to our ADR depositary for distribution to holders of ADSs. Additional Payments on Shareholders’ Equity Since January 1, 1996, Brazilian companies have been permitted to pay interest on shareholders’ equity to holders of equity securities and to treat those payments as a deductible expense for Brazilian income tax purposes. The amount of interest payable on capital is calculated based on the TJLP – Long Term Interest Rate, as determined by the Central Bank, and applied to each shareholder’s portion of net equity. Brazilian Corporate Law establishes that current earnings are not included as part of the net equity. The TJLP is determined by the Central Bank on a quarterly basis. The TJLP is based on the annual profitability average of Brazilian public internal and external debt. The TJLP rate for the fourth quarter of 20122015 was 5.5%6.25%. Interest on shareholders’ equity is deductible up to the greater of the following amounts:(i) 50% of the net profits,income (before taking into account the amounts attributable to shareholders as determined for accounting purposes, forinterest on shareholders' equity and the current periodprovision of interest paymentcorporate income tax but after the deduction of the provision of the social contribution on net profits and beforeprofits) related to the provision for income tax andperiod in respect of which the deduction of the amount of such interest; andpayment is made; or (ii) 50% of the balancesum of accumulated earningsretained profits and profits reserves from prior years.as of the date of the beginning of the fiscal year in respect of which the payment is made
Table of contents 8B. Significant Changes None Item 9. The Offer and Listing 9A. Offer and Listing Details Our capital stock is comprised of common shares without par value (ações ordinárias). On January 22, 2008, our shareholders approved a one-for-three split of our common shares. As a result of this stock split, each common share of our capital stock as of January 22, 2008 became represented by three common shares after the split. The same ratio of one common share for each ADS was maintained. On March 25, 2010, our shareholders approved a two-for-one split of our common shares. As a result of this stock split, each common share of our capital stock as of March 25, 2010 became represented by two common shares after the split. The same ratio of one common share for each ADS was maintained. See “Item 10.B. Memorandum and Articles of Association.” The following table sets forth information concerning the high and low closing sale prices and the average daily trading volume of our common shares on the BM&FBOVESPA (per common share) and the ADSs on the NYSE for the periods indicated.indicated: | Common Shares(1) | American Depositary Shares(1) | | US$ per Share(2) | | Volume | US$ per ADS | | Volume | | High | | Low | | (Inthousands) | High | | Low | | (Inthousands) | 2007: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Year end | | 14.90 | | 4.67 | | 5,330 | | 15.28 | | 4.71 | | 6,980 | | 2008: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Year end | | 25.63 | | 4.12 | | 5,761 | | 25.51 | | 3.94 | | 9,219 | | 2009: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Year end | | 18.45 | | 6.03 | | 4,930 | | 18.61 | | 6.00 | | 7,214 | | 2010: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Year end | | 20.81 | | 13.37 | | 3,637 | | 20.76 | | 13.38 | | 5,360 | | 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | First quarter | | 17.98 | | 15.24 | | 3,036 | | 18.33 | | 15.41 | | 4,377 | | Second quarter | | 16.81 | | 11.60 | | 3,169 | | 17.22 | | 11.81 | | 4,453 | | Third quarter | | 12.55 | | 7.89 | | 3,780 | | 12.62 | | 7.94 | | 5,932 | | Fourth quarter | | 9.66 | | 7.23 | | 3,683 | | 9.89 | | 7.31 | | 4,573 | | Year End | | 17.98 | | 7.23 | | 3,422 | | 18.33 | | 7.31 | | 4,840 | | 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | First quarter | | 10.83 | | 8.09 | | 3,958 | | 10.88 | | 8.53 | | 5,486 | | Second quarter | | 9.58 | | 5.23 | | 3,914 | | 9.63 | | 5.24 | | 5,078 | | Third quarter | | 6.80 | | 4.56 | | 6,435 | | 6.78 | | 4.55 | | 7,331 | | Fourth quarter | | 5.84 | | 4.75 | | 4,940 | | 5.90 | | 4.72 | | 6,695 | | Year End | | 10.83 | | 4.56 | | 4,817 | | 10.88 | | 4.55 | | 6,148 | | 2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | First quarter | | 6.25 | | 4.49 | | 5,561 | | 6.23 | | 4.48 | | 5,213 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Common Shares(1) | | American Depositary Shares(1) | | | U.S.$ per Share(2) | | Volume | | U.S.$ per ADS | | Volume | | | High | | Low | | (Inthousands) | | High | | Low | | (Inthousands) | 2010 | | | | | | | | | | | | | Year end | | 14.58 | | 10.26 | | 3,680 | | 14.67 | | 9.76 | | 5,349 | 2011 | | | | | | | | | | | | | Year end | | 16.60 | | 5.83 | | 3,456 | | 13.37 | | 5.62 | | 4,828 | 2012 | | | | | | | | | | | | | Year End | | 7.58 | | 3.79 | | 4,868 | | 8.36 | | 3.67 | | 6,131 | 2013 | | | | | | | | | | | | | First quarter | | 5.22 | | 3.69 | | 5,607 | | 5.11 | | 3.68 | | 5,175 | Second quarter | | 3.79 | | 2.39 | | 7,943 | | 3.80 | | 2.37 | | 6,103 | Third quarter | | 3.73 | | 2.02 | | 8,441 | | 3.87 | | 2.10 | | 6,823 | Fourth quarter | | 5.71 | | 3.62 | | 6,285 | | 5.64 | | 3.73 | | 6,752 | Year End | | 6.01 | | 2.14 | | 7,104 | | 5.64 | | 2.07 | | 6,225 | 2014 | | | | | | | | | | | | | First quarter | | 5.50 | | 3.37 | | 6,458 | | 5.59 | | 3.39 | | 6,057 | Second quarter | | 4.14 | | 3.56 | | 5,764 | | 4.17 | | 3.59 | | 3,925 | Third quarter | | 4.82 | | 3.54 | | 5,715 | | 4.88 | | 3.31 | | 5,515 | Fourth quarter | | 3.33 | | 1.65 | | 6,146 | | 3.49 | | 1.55 | | 5,299 | Year End | | 5.52 | | 1.79 | | 6,019 | | 5.59 | | 1.55 | | 5,185 | 2015 | | | | | | | | | | | | | First quarter | | 2.13 | | 1.39 | | 5,992 | | 2.02 | | 1.45 | | 2,941 | Second quarter | | 2.95 | | 1.68 | | 5,139 | | 2.89 | | 1.65 | | 3,003 | Third quarter | | 1.63 | | 0.79 | | 6,847 | | 1.61 | | 0.77 | | 3,771 | Fourth quarter | | 1.59 | | 0.96 | | 7,273 | | 1.58 | | 0.94 | | 1,521 | Year End | | 2.71 | | 0.83 | | 6,314 | | 2.89 | | 0.77 | | 2,372 | 2016 | | | | | | | | | | | | | First quarter | | 2.11 | | 0.81 | | 7,207 | | 2.27 | | 0.73 | | 1,774 | Month Ended: | | | | | | | | | | | | | April 29, 2016 | | 3.83 | | 1.96 | | 10,269 | | 3.78 | | 1.94 | | 3,382 | | Source: Economática and Bloomberg. | | (1) | Prices and volumes of our common shares and ADSs have been adjusted to reflect the two-for-one stock split occurred in March 2010 whereby each common share of our capital stock on March 25, 2010 became represented by two common shares. See “Item 10.B. Memorandum and Articles of Association.” | | (2) | U.S. dollar amounts have been translated fromreaisat the exchange rates in effect on the respective dates of the quotations for the common shares set forth above. These U.S. dollar amounts may reflect exchange rate fluctuations and may not correspond to changes in nominalreaisprices over time. |
Table Of Contentsof contents Month Ended:
October 31, 2012 | | 5.82 | | 5.34 | | 4,263 | | 5.78 | | 5.30 | | 6,963 | November 30, 2012 | | 5.82 | | 4.75 | | 5,186 | | 5.75 | | 4.72 | | 7,295 | December 31, 2012 | | 5.84 | | 4.93 | | 5,509 | | 5.90 | | 4.84 | | 5,784 | January 31, 2013 | | 6.25 | | 5.41 | | 5,314 | | 6.23 | | 5.43 | | 5,409 | February 28, 2013 | | 5.62 | | 4.93 | | 4,876 | | 5.54 | | 4.90 | | 4,065 | March 31, 2013 | | 5.45 | | 4.49 | | 6,437 | | 5.44 | | 4.48 | | 6,097 |
Source: Economática.
| (1)
| Prices and volumes of our common shares and ADSs have been adjusted to reflect the two-for-one stock split occurred in March 2010 whereby each common share of our capital stock on March 25, 2010 became represented by two common shares. See “Item 10.B. Memorandum and Articles of Association.”
| (2)
| U.S. dollar amounts have been translated fromreaisat the exchange rates in effect on the respective dates of the quotations for the common shares set forth above. These U.S. dollar amounts may reflect exchange rate fluctuations and may not correspond to changes in nominalreaisprices over time.
|
As of April 29, 2013,2016, the closing sale price (i) per common share on the BM&FBOVESPA was of R$7.8713.14 and (ii) per ADS on the NYSE was of US$3.93.3.78. The ADSs are issued under a deposit agreement and JP Morgan Bankserves as depositary under that agreement. As of December 31, 2012,2015, approximately 343336,435 million, or approximately 23.5%24.2%, of our outstanding common shares were held through ADSs. Substantially all of these ADSs were held of record by The Depository Trust Company. In addition, our records indicate that on that date there were approximately 155172 record holders (other than our ADR depositary) with addresses in the U.S., holding an aggregate of approximately 6661 million common shares, representing 4.5%10.0% of our outstanding common shares. 9B. Plan of Distribution Not applicable. 9C. Regulation of Securities Markets The principal trading market for our common shares is BM&FBOVESPA. Our ADSs trade on the NYSE under the symbol “SID.” Trading on the BM&FBOVESPA and NYSE CSN shares traded in the market are comprised of ordinary shares without nominal value. Ordinary shares are traded on the Brazilian Stock Exchange, BM&FBOVESPA, under the code CSNA3. Our ADSs, each one representing an ordinary share, are traded on the New York Stock Exchange, NYSE, under the code SID. In 2000, the BM&FBOVESPA was reorganized through the execution of a memoranda of understanding by the Brazilian stock exchanges. Under the memoranda, all securities in Brazil are now traded only on the BM&FBOVESPA. When shareholders trade in common and preferred shares on the BM&FBOVESPA, the trade is settled in three business days after the trade date without adjustment of the purchase price for inflation. The seller is ordinarily required to deliver the shares to the exchange on the third business day following the trade date. Delivery of and payment for shares are made through the facilities of BM&FBOVESPA’s clearinghouse. The BM&FBOVESPA is significantly less liquid than the NYSE or other major exchanges in the world. As of December 2012,2015, the aggregate market capitalization of the BM&FBOVESPA was equivalent to R$2.51.91 trillion (or US$1.2 trillion)US.$ 490 billion). In contrast, as of December 2012,2015, the aggregate market capitalization of the NYSE was US$14.124.50 trillion. The average daily trading volume of the BM&FBOVESPA and NYSE for December 20122015 was ofapproximately R$7.56.79 billion (or US$3.7US.$ 2.04 billion) and US$51.2U.S.$ 3.69 billion, respectively. Although any of the outstanding shares of a listed company may trade on the BM&FBOVESPA, in most cases fewer than half of the listed shares are actually available for trading by the public, since the remaining shares are generally being held by small groups of controlling persons, by government entities or by one principal shareholder. See “Item 3. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to the ADSstheADSs and Our Common Shares— The relative volatility and illiquidity of the Brazilian securities markets may substantially limit your ability to sell the common shares underlying the ADSs at the price and time you desire.”desire”
Table Of Contentsof contents As of December 31, 2012,2015, we accounted for approximately 0.69%2.90% of the market capitalization of all listed companies on the BM&FBOVESPA. The following table reflects the fluctuations in the Ibovespa index during the periods indicated: Ibovespa Index | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | High | | Low | | Close | | High | | Low | | Close | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2007 | | 65,790 | | 41,179 | | 63,886 | | 2008 | | 73,516 | | 29,435 | | 37,550 | | 2009 | | 69,349 | | 36,234 | | 68,588 | | 2010 | | 72,995 | | 58,192 | | 69,304 | | 72,995 | | 58,192 | | 69,304 | 2011 | | 71,632 | | 48,668 | | 56,754 | | 71,632 | | 48,668 | | 56,754 | 2012 | | 68,394 | | 52,481 | | 60,952 | | 68,394 | | 52,481 | | 60,952 | 2013 | | | 63,472 | | 44,816 | | 51,507 | 2014 | | | 62,304 | | 44,904 | | 50,007 | 2015 | | | 58,574 | | 42,749 | | 44,014 | 2016 (through March 31) | | | 50,023 | | 37,046 | | 49,084 |
2013 (through March 31)
| | 63,312
| | 54,873
| | 56,352
|
The IBOVESPA index closed at 56,35249,084 on March 31, 2013.2016. Trading on the BM&FBOVESPA by nonresidents of Brazil is subject to certain limitations under Brazilian foreign investment legislation. See “Item 10D. Exchange Controls.” Regulation of the Brazilian Securities Markets The Brazilian securities markets are regulated by CVM, which has authority over stock exchanges and the securities markets in general, and by the Central Bank, which has, among other powers, licensing authority over brokerage firms and regulates foreign investment and foreign exchange transactions. The Brazilian securities market is governed by Law No. 6,385, dated December 7, 1976, as amended, or the Brazilian Securities Law, Brazilian Corporate Law and regulations issued by CVM. Under Brazilian Corporate Law, a company is either public, acompanhia aberta, such as CSN, or private, acompanhia fechada. All public companies are registered with CVM and are subject to reporting and regulatory requirements. Trading in securities on the BM&FBOVESPA may be suspended at the request of a company in anticipation of a material announcement. The company should also suspend its trading on international stock exchanges where its securities are traded. Trading may also be suspended on the initiative of the BM&FBOVESPA or CVM, among other reasons, based on or due to a belief that a company has provided inadequate information regarding a material event or has provided inadequate responses to the inquires by CVM or the BM&FBOVESPA. The Brazilian Securities Law and the regulations issued by CVM provide for, among other things, disclosure requirements, restrictions on insider trading and price manipulation, as well as protection of minority shareholders. However, the Brazilian securities markets are not as highly regulated and supervised as the United States securities markets or markets in certain other jurisdictions.
Table Of Contents
According to Law No 6,385, dated December 7, 1976, a publicly held company must submit to CVM and BM&FBOVESPA certain periodic information, including annual and quarterly reports prepared by management and independent auditors. This legislation also requires companies to file with CVM shareholder agreements, notices of shareholders’ meetings and copies of the related minutes. Pursuant to CVM Resolution No. 358, of January 3, 2002, as recently modified by CVM Instruction No. 565, of June 15, 2015, CVM revised and consolidated the requirements regarding the disclosure and use of information related to material facts and acts of publicly held companies, including the disclosure of information in the trading and acquisition of securities issued by publicly held companies.
Table of contents Such requirements include provisions that: · Establish the concept of a material fact that gives rise to reporting requirements. Material facts include decisions made by the controlling shareholders, resolutions of the shareholders at a shareholders’ meeting and of management of the company, or any other facts related to a company’s business (whether occurring within the company or otherwise somehow related thereto) that may influence the price of its publicly traded securities, or the decision of investors to trade such securities or to exercise any of such securities’ underlying rights; · Specify examples of facts that are considered to be material, which include, among others, the execution of agreements providing for the transfer of control of the company, the entry or withdrawal of shareholders that maintain any managing, financial, technological or administrative function with or contribution to the company, and any corporate restructuring undertaken among related companies; · Oblige the investor relations officer, controlling shareholders, other officers, directors, members of the audit committee and other advisory boards to disclose material facts; · Require simultaneous disclosure of material facts to all markets in which the corporation’s securities are admitted for trading; · Require the acquirer of a controlling stake in a corporation to disclose material facts, including its intentions as to whether or not to de-list the corporation’s shares within one year from the acquisition of such controlling stake; · Establish rules regarding disclosure requirements in the acquisition and disposal of a material ownership interest; and · Forbid trading on the basis of material non-public information. Pursuant to CVM Rule No. 480, ofdated December 7, 2009, as amended (“CVM Rule No. 480”), CVM expanded the quantity and improvesimproved the quality of information reported by issuers in Brazil. This Rule represents a significant step forward in providing the market with greater transparency over securities issuers and provides for issuers to file annually a comprehensive and opinative reference form (Formulário de Referência).The reference form (Formulário de Referência) is in line with the Shelf Registration System recommended by the International Organization Securities Commission (IOSCO) and adopted in other countries (England and the United States, among others), by means of which the information regarding an specific issuer is consolidated into one document and is subject to periodic update (the “Shelf Document”). This mechanism offers the investor the possibility to analyze one single document for relevant information about the issuer. CVM Rule No. 480 also created two groups of issuers per type of securities traded. Group A issuers are authorized to trade in any securities, whereas Group B issuers must not trade in stocks, depositary receipts (BDRs, Units) and securities convertible or exchangeable into stocks or depositary receipts. The greater extend of Group A authorization is followed by more stringent disclosure and reporting requirements. We, as issuers of stocks, are part of Group A and, as such, are subject to more stringent disclosure and reporting requirements. CVM has also enacted Rule No. 481, ofdated December 17, 2009, as amended (“CVM Rule No. 481”), to regulate two key issues involving general meetings of shareholders in publicly held companies: (i) the extent of information and documents to be provided insupport of call notices (subject to prior disclosure to shareholders); and (ii) proxy solicitation for exercise of voting rights.
Table Of Contents
CVM Rule No. 481 is intended to (i) improve the quality of information disclosed by publicly held companies to shareholders and to the market in general, favoring the use of Internet as a vehicle to that end; (ii) make the exercise of voting rights less costly and foster the participation of shareholders in general meetings, speciallyespecially for companies with widely dispersed capital; and, consequently (iii) facilitate the oversight of corporate businesses. 9D. Selling Shareholders Not applicable.
Table of contents 9E. Dilution Not applicable. 9F. Expenses of the Issue Not applicable. Item 10. Additional Information 10A. Share Capital Not applicable. 10B. Memorandum and Articles of Association Registration and Corporate Purpose We are registered with the Department of Trade Registration under number 15,910. Our corporate purpose, as set forth in Article 2 of our bylaws, is to manufacture, transform, market, import and export steel products and steel derived by-products, as well as to explore other activities that are directly or indirectly related to our corporate purpose, including: mining, cement and carbochemical business activities, the manufacture and assembly of metallic structures, construction, transportation, navigation and port activities. Directors’ Powers Pursuant to our bylaws, a director may not vote on a proposal, arrangement or contract in which the director’s interests conflict with our interests. In addition, our shareholders must approve the compensation of our management and, in case a global amount is fixed, our Board of Directors is responsible for allocating individual amounts of management compensation. There is no mandatory retirement age for our directors. A detailed description of the general duties and powers of our Board of Directors may be found in “Item 6A. Directors and Senior Management.” Description of Capital Stock Set forth below is certain information concerning our capital stock and a brief summary of certain significant provisions of our bylaws and Brazilian Corporate Law applicable to our capital stock. This description does not purport to be complete and is qualified by reference to our bylaws and to Brazilian law. For further information, see our bylaws, which have been filed as an exhibit to this annual report. Capital Stock On December 31, 20122015 our capital stock was composed of 1,457,970,1081,387,524,047 common shares. Our bylaws authorize the Board of Directors to increase the capital stock up to 2,400,000,000 common shares without an amendment to our bylaws. There are currently no classes or series of preferred shares issued or outstanding. We may purchase our own shares for purposes of cancellation or to hold them in treasury subject to certain limits andconditions established by the CVM and Brazilian Corporate Law. See “Item 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers.”
Table Of Contents
Liability for Further Capital Calls Pursuant to Brazilian Corporate Law, a shareholder’s liability is generally limited to the issue price of the subscribed or purchased shares. There is no obligation of a shareholder to participate in additional capital calls. Voting Rights Each common share entitles the holder to one vote at our shareholders’ meetings. According to CVM regulations, shareholders that represent at least 5% of our common shares may request cumulative voting in an election of our Board of Directors. Pursuant to Brazilian Corporate Law, shareholders holding at least 15% of our common shares have the right to appoint a member of our Board of Directors.
Table of contents Shareholders’ Meetings Pursuant to Brazilian Corporate Law, the shareholders present at an annual or extraordinary shareholders’ meeting, convened and held in accordance with Brazilian Corporate Law and our bylaws are empowered to decide all matters relating to our corporate purpose and to pass any resolutions they deem necessary for our protection and well-being. In order to participate in a shareholders’ meeting, a shareholder must be a record owner of the share on the day the meeting is held, and may be represented by a proxy. Shareholders’ meetings are called, convened and presided over by the Chairman of our Board of Directors or, in his absence, by whom he appoints. Brazilian Corporate Law requires that our shareholders’ meeting be convened by publication of a notice in theDiário Oficial do Estado de São Paulo, the official government publication of the State of São Paulo, and in a newspaper of general circulation in Brazil and in the city in which our principal place of business is located, currently theJornal Valor Econômico, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled meeting date and no fewer than three times. Both notices must contain the agenda for the meeting and, in the case of an amendment to our bylaws, an indication of the subject matter. In order for a shareholders’ meeting to be held, shareholders representing a quorum of at least one-fourth of the voting capital must be present, except for meetings convened to amend our bylaws, where shareholders representing at least two-thirds of the voting capital must be present. A shareholder may be represented at a shareholders’ meeting by means of a proxy, appointed not more than one year before the meeting, who must be either a shareholder, a company officer or a lawyer. For public companies, such as we are, the proxy may also be a financial institution. If no quorum is present, notice must be given in the manner described above, no fewer than eight days prior to the scheduled meeting date. On second notice, the meeting may be convened without a specific quorum requirement, subject to the minimum quorum and voting requirements for certain matters, as described below. A holder of shares with no voting rights may attend a shareholders’ meeting and take part in the discussion of matters submitted for consideration. Except as otherwise provided by law, resolutions passed at a shareholders’ meeting require a simple majority vote, abstentions not considered. Pursuant to Brazilian Corporate Law, the approval of shareholders representing at least one-half of the issued and outstanding voting shares is required for the following actions: (i) to create a new class of preferred shares or disproportionately increase an existing class of preferred shares relative to the other classes of preferred shares, to change a priority, preference, right, privilege or condition of redemption or amortization of any class of preferred shares or to create any class of non-voting preferred shares that has a priority, preference, right, condition or redemption or amortization superior to an existing class of shares (in these cases, a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of the affected class is also required); (ii) to reduce the Mandatory Dividend; (iii) to change our corporate purpose; (iv) to merge into or consolidate with another company or to spin-off our assets; (v) to dissolve or liquidate our Company; (vi) to cancel any liquidation procedure; (vii) to authorize the issuance of founders’ shares; and (viii) to participate in a centralized group of companies as defined under Brazilian Corporate Law.
Table Of Contents
Pursuant to Brazilian Corporate Law, shareholders voting at a shareholders’ meeting have the power to: (i) amend our bylaws; (ii) elect or dismiss members of our Board of Directors (and members of the Fiscal Committee) at any time; (iii) receive and approve the annual management accounts, including the allocation of net profits and the distributable amounts for payment of the mandatory dividends and allocation to the various reserve accounts; (iv) authorize the issuance of debentures in general; (v) suspend the rights of a shareholder who has violated Brazilian Corporate Law or our bylaws; (vi) accept or reject the valuation of assets contributed by a shareholder in consideration of the subscription of shares in our capital stock; (vii) authorize the issuance of founders’ shares; (viii) pass resolutions authorizing reorganization of our legal form, a merger, consolidation or split of the company, dissolution and liquidation of the company, election and dismissal of our liquidators and to examine their accounts; and (ix) authorize management to declare the company insolvent and to request arecuperação judicial orrecuperação extrajudicial (a procedure involving protection from creditors similar in nature to a reorganization under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code), among others.
Table of contents Redemption Rights Our common shares are not redeemable, except that a dissenting and adversely affected shareholder is entitled, under Brazilian Corporate Law, to obtain redemption upon a decision made at a shareholders’ meeting by shareholders representing at least one-half of the issued and outstanding voting shares to: (i) create a new class of preferred shares or to disproportionately increase an existing class of preferred shares relative to the other classes of preferred shares (unless these actions are provided for or authorized by our bylaws); (ii) modify a preference, privilege or condition of redemption or amortization conferred on one or more classes of preferred shares, or to create a new class with greater privileges than an existing class of preferred shares; (iii) reduce the mandatory distribution of dividends; (iv) change our corporate purpose; (v) merge us with another company or consolidate us; (vi) transfer all of our shares to another company in order to make us a wholly-owned subsidiary of that company (incorporação); (vii) approve the acquisition of control of another company at a price that exceeds certain limits set forth under Brazilian Corporate Law; (viii) approve our participation in a centralized group of companies as defined under Brazilian Corporate Law; (ix) conduct a spin-off that results in (a) a change of corporate purpose, (b) a reduction of the Mandatory Dividend or (c) any participation in a group of companies as defined under Brazilian Corporate Law; or (x) in the event that the entity resulting from (a) a merger or consolidation, (b) anincorporação as described above or (c) a spin-off of a listed company fails to become a listed company within 120 days of the shareholders’ meeting at which the decision was taken. The right o fof redemption lapses 30 days after publication of the minutes of the relevant shareholders’ meeting. We would be entitled to reconsider any action giving rise to redemption rights within 10 days following the expiration of those rights, if the redemption of shares of dissenting shareholders would jeopardize our financial stability. Law No. 9,457, dated May 5, 1997, which amended Brazilian Corporate Law, contains provisions which, among others, restrict redemption rights in certain cases and allow companies to redeem their shares at their market value, subject to certain requirements. According to Brazilian Corporate Law, the reimbursement value of the common shares must equal the book value, which is determined by dividing our net assets by the total number of shares issued by us, excluding treasury shares (if any). Preemptive Rights Except as provided for in Brazilian Corporate Law (such as in the case of mergers and public offerings), our bylaws allow each of our shareholders a general preemptive right to subscribe to shares in any capital increase, in proportion to his or her ownership interest. A minimum period of 30 days following the publication of notice of a capital increase is allowed for the exercise of the right and the right is transferable. In the event of a capital increase that would maintain or increase the proportion of capital represented by common shares, holders of ADSs will have preemptive rights to subscribe only to newly issued common shares. In the event of a capital increase that would reduce the proportion of capital represented by common shares, holders of ADSs will have preemptive rights to subscribe for common shares, in proportion to their ownership interest, only to the extent necessary to prevent dilution of their interest in us. Form and Transfer As our common shares are in registered form, the transfer of shares is governed by the rules of Article 31, paragraph 3, of Brazilian Corporate Law, which provides that a transfer of shares is effected by a transfer recorded in a company’s share transfer records upon presentation of valid share transfer instructions to the company by a transferor or its representative. When common shares are acquired or sold on a Brazilian stock exchange, thetransfer is effected on our records by a representative of a brokerage firm or the stock exchange’s clearing system. Transfers of shares by a non-Brazilian shareholder are made in the same way and are executed by such shareholders’ local agent.
Table Of Contents
The BM&FBOVESPA operates a central clearing system. A holder of our common shares may choose, at its discretion, to participate in this system and, in that case, all shares elected to be put into this system will be deposited in the custody of the BM&FBOVESPA (through a Brazilian institution duly authorized to operate by the Central Bank and having a clearing account with the BM&FBOVESPA). The fact that those common shares are held in the custody of the BM&FBOVESPA will be reflected in our register of shareholders. Each participating shareholder will, in turn, be registered in our register of beneficial shareholders maintained by the BM&FBOVESPA and will be treated in the same way as registered shareholders.
Table of contents Limitations on Ownership and Voting Rights by non-Brazilians Shareholders There are no restrictions on ownership or voting of our common shares by individuals or legal entities domiciled outside Brazil. However, the right to convert dividend payments and proceeds from the sale of common shares into foreign currency and to remit those amounts outside Brazil is subject to exchange control restrictions and foreign investment legislation which generally require, among other things, obtaining a Certificate of Registration under the Brazilian National Monetary Council’s Resolution No. 2,689 or its direct foreign investment regulations. See “Item 10D. Exchange Controls.” Share Ownership Disclosure There are no provisions in our bylaws governing the ownership threshold above which shareholder ownership must be disclosed. CVM regulations require the disclosure of (i) the acquisition of 5% of any class of capital stock of a listed company and any subsequent direct or indirect acquisition or disposition of at least 5% of any such class of capital stock, (ii) acquisition of control of a listed company and (iii) the ownership of shares of capital stock of a listed company by members of such company’s Board of Executive Officers, Board of Directors, Audit Committee, Fiscal Committee (if any) and any other consulting or technical body (if any) and certain relatives of those persons. 10C. Material Contracts None. There are no restrictions on ownership or voting of our common shares by individuals or legal entities domiciled outside Brazil. However, the right to convert dividend payments and proceeds from the sale of common shares into foreign currency and to remit those amounts outside Brazil is subject to exchange control restrictions and foreign investment legislation which generally require, among other things, obtaining a Certificate of Registration under the Brazilian National Monetary Council’s Resolution No. 2,689, dated March 31, 2000, or its direct foreign investment regulations. Resolution No. 2,689, dated March 31, 2000, introduced new rules to facilitate foreign investment in Brazil. The principal changes for foreign investors entering the Brazilian market include: · the removal of restrictions on investments by portfolio composition (e.g., equities, fixed income and derivatives); and · permission for foreign individuals and corporations to invest in the Brazilian market, in addition to foreign institutional investors. Prior to Resolution No. 2,689, foreign investors had to leave and reenter the country in order to switch their investments from equity to fixed income. Now foreign investors can freely switch their investments without leaving the local market. Foreign investors registered with the CVM and acting through authorized custody accounts and a legal representative may buy and sell any local financial product traded on the local exchanges and registered on the local clearing systems, including shares on the BM&FBOVESPA, without obtaining separate Certificates ofRegistration for each transaction. Pursuant to Resolution No. 2,689, as amended, investors are also generally entitled to favorable tax treatment. See “Item 10E. Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations.”
Table Of Contents
A Certificate of Registration has been issued in the name of JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A., as our ADR depositary, and is maintained by theItaú Corretora de Valores S.A., our ADR custodian, on behalf of our ADR depositary. Pursuant to the Certificate, our ADR custodian and our ADR depositary are able to convert dividends and other distributions with respect to the common shares represented by ADSs into foreign currency and remit the proceeds outside Brazil. In the event that a holder of ADSs surrenders its ADSs for common shares, that holder will be entitled to continue to rely on our ADR depositary’s Certificate of Registration for only five business days after the surrender, following which the holder must obtain its own Certificate of Registration. Thereafter, unless the common shares are held pursuant to Resolution No. 2,689 or direct foreign investment regulations, the holder may not be able to convert into foreign currency and remit outside Brazil the proceeds from the disposition of, or distributions with respect to, those common shares, and the holder generally will be subject to less favorable Brazilian tax treatment than a holder of ADSs. See “Item 10E. Taxation—Brazilian Tax Considerations.”
Table of contents A non-Brazilian holder of common shares may experience delays in obtaining a Certificate of Registration, which may delay remittances abroad. This kind of delay may adversely affect the amount, in U.S. dollars, received by the non-Brazilian holder. Under current Brazilian legislation, the Brazilian government may impose temporary restrictions on remittances of foreign capital abroad in the event of a serious imbalance or an anticipated serious imbalance of Brazil’s balance of payments. For approximately nine months in 1989 and early 1990, the Brazilian government froze all dividend and capital repatriations held by the Central Bank that were owed to foreign equity investors in order to conserve Brazil’s foreign currency reserves. These amounts were subsequently released in accordance with Brazilian government directives. See “Item 3D. Risk Factors—Risks Relating to our Common Shares and ADSs—If you surrender your ADSs and withdraw common shares, you risk losing the ability to remit foreign currency abroad and certain Brazilian tax advantages.” For a description of the foreign exchange markets in Brazil, see “Item 3A. Selected Financial Data– Exchange Rates.” 10E. Taxation The following is a summary of certain U.S. federal income and Brazilian tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our common shares or ADSs by an investor that holds such common shares or ADSs. This summary does not purport to address all material tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our common shares or ADSs, does not take into account the specific circumstances of any particular investor and does not address certain investors that may be subject to special tax rules. This summary is based on the tax laws of the United States (including the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, its legislative history, existing and proposed Treasury regulations thereunder, published rulings and court decisions) and Brazil, as in effect on the date hereof, which are subject to change (or changes in interpretation), possibly with retroactive effect. In addition, this summary is based in part upon the representations of our ADSs depositary and the assumption that each obligation in our deposit agreement and any related agreement will be performed in accordance with its terms. Although there is, at present, no income tax treaty between Brazil and the United States, the tax authorities of the two countries have had discussions that may result in such a treaty. Both countries have been accepting the offset of income taxes paid in one country against the income tax due in the other based on reciprocity. No assurance can be given, however, as to whether or when an income tax treaty will enter into force or how it will affect the U.S. Holders, as defined below, of our common shares or ADSs. This discussion does not address any aspects of U.S. taxation (such as estate tax, gift tax and Medicare tax on net investment income) other than federal income taxation or any aspects of Brazilian taxation other than income, gift, inheritance and capital taxation. Prospective investors are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the Brazilian and U.S. federal, state and local tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our common shares and ADSs.
Table Of Contents
Brazilian Tax Considerations The following discussion summarizes the principal Brazilian tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of common shares or ADSs by a holder that is not domiciled in Brazil for purposes of Brazilian taxation (a “Non-Resident(”Non-Resident Holder”). It is based on Brazilian law as currently in effect. Any change in such law may change the consequences described below, possibly with retroactive effect. This discussion does not specifically address all of the Brazilian tax considerations applicable to any particular Non-Resident Holder. Each Non-Resident Holder of common shares or ADSs should consult their own tax advisor concerning the Brazilian tax consequences of an investment in our common shares or ADSs. A Non-Resident Holder of ADSs may withdraw them in exchange for common shares in Brazil. Pursuant to Brazilian law, the Non-Resident Holder may invest in common shares under Resolution 2,689, of January 26, 2000, of the National Monetary Council (a “2,689”2,689 Holder”).
Table of contents Taxation of Dividends and Interest on Shareholders’Shareholders Equity Dividends, including stock dividends and other dividends, paid by us (i) to our ADSs depositary in respect of the common shares underlying the ADSs or (ii) to a Non-Resident Holder in respect of common shares, are currently not subject to Brazilian withholding income tax, as far as such amounts are related to profits generated on or after January 1, 1996. Dividends relating to profits generated prior to January 1, 1996 may be subject to Brazilian withholding income tax at varying rates, depending on the year such profits have been generated.generated, but CSN does not have any profits generated prior to January 1, 1996. It is important to note that as from January 1st, 2008, Brazil has adopted new GAAP, following IFRS standards. As from such date, Brazilian income taxes were calculated under a temporary regime called Transitional Tax Regime (RTT, in the Portuguese acronym). The goal of such regime was to neutralize the impacts on the calculation of the corporate income tax in Brazil that could derive from the adoption of the new GAAP. Law 12.973 was then enacted in 2013, with the goal to adapt Brazilian tax legislation, based on the new GAAP, eliminating the RTT. With the introduction of the new rules, the law determined that, for fiscal year 2014, any dividends paid out of accounting profits which, for any reason, would be higher than the “tax profits” calculated according to the RTT, would be subject to withholding income tax in Brazil. Nonetheless, CSN does not have relevant accounting adjustments which could result in a lower “tax profit” as compared to the group’s accounting profit, reason why no withholding income tax shall be levied on any future distribution of dividends paid out of profits generated in 2014. As from fiscal year 2015, since there is no “tax profit” under the RTT, no potential exposure should exist, and the exemption for dividends is normally applicable again. Since 1996, Brazilian companies have been permitted to pay limited amounts of interest on shareholders' equity to holders of equity securities and to treat those payments as a deductible expense for purposes of its Brazilian income tax and social contribution on net profits tax basis. For tax purposes, this interest is limited to the daily pro rata variation of the Brazilian Federal Government's Long-Term Interest Rate (“TJLP”),or TJLP, as determined by the Central Bank from time to time, multiplied by the net equity value of the Brazilian company, and the amount of the deduction may not exceed the greater of (i) 50% of the net income (before taking into account the amounts attributable to shareholders as interest on shareholders' equity and the provision of corporate income tax but after the deduction of the provision of the social contribution on net profits) related to the period in respect of which the payment is made; or (ii) 50% of the sum of retained profits and profits reserves as of the date of the beginning of the fiscal year in respect of which the payment is made. Payments of interest on shareholders' equity are decided by the shareholders on the basis of the recommendations of our Board of Directors. Payment of interest on shareholders' equity to a Non-Resident Holder is subject to withholding income tax at the rate of 15%, or 25% if the Non-Resident Holder is domiciled in a tax haven. For this purpose, a “tax”tax haven” or “low-tax”low-tax regime” is a country or location (1) that does not impose income tax, (2) where the income tax rate is lower than 20% or (3) where the local legislation imposes restrictions on disclosing the shareholding composition or ownership of the investment (“(”Tax Haven Jurisdiction”). These payments of interest on shareholders' equity may be included at their net value, as part of any mandatory dividend. To the extent payment of interest on shareholders' equity is so included, the corporation is required to distribute to shareholders an additional amount to ensure that the net amount received by them, after payment of the applicable Brazilian withholding income tax, plus the amount of declared dividends is at least equal to the mandatory dividend. No assurance can be given that our board of directors will not recommend that future distributions of income should be made by means of interest on shareholders' equity instead of dividends. Taxation of Gains Capital gains realized by Non-Resident Holders on the disposition of common shares sold on the Brazilian stock exchange (which includes the transactions carried out on the organized over-the-counter market):
Table of contents · are exempt, when realized by a Non-Resident Holder that (i) is a 2,689 Holder and (ii) is not resident or domiciled in a Tax Haven Jurisdiction;
Table Of Contents
· are subject to income tax at a raterates varying from 15% to 22.5%, depending on the total amount of 15%gains within the same fiscal year (see table below) in case of gains realized by (A) a Non-Resident Holder that (i) is not a 2,689 Holder and (ii) is not resident or domiciled in a Tax Haven Jurisdiction; or (B) a Non-Resident Holder that (i) is a 2,689 Holder and (ii) is resident or domiciled in a Tax Haven Jurisdiction; and · are subject to income tax at a rate of up to 25% in case of gains realized by a Non-Resident Holder that (i) is not a 2,689 Holder and (ii) is resident or domiciled in a Tax Haven Jurisdiction. The capital gains rates described above, varying from 15% to 22.5%, shall be determined according to the following table: Capital Gains Tax rate | Threshold (total gains on the sale of the same rights within a same fiscal year) | 15.0% | Total gains below BRL 5 million | 17.5% | Total gains above BRL 5 million, but below BRL 10 million | 20.0% | Total gains above BRL 10 million, but below BRL 30 million | 22.5% | Total gains above BRL 30 million |
As a general rule, capital gains realized as a result of a disposition transaction are the positive difference between the amount realized on the disposition of the common shares and the respective acquisition cost. According to Law No. 10,833/03, the gains recognized on a disposition of assets located in Brazil, such as our common shares, by a Non-Resident Holder, are subject to withholding income tax in Brazil. This rule is applicable regardless of whether the disposition is conducted in Brazil or abroad and/or if the disposition is or is not made to an individual or entity resident or domiciled in Brazil. A withholding income tax of 0.005% will apply and can be offset against any income tax due on the capital gain. Such withholding does not apply to a 2,689 Holder that is not resident or domiciled in a Tax Haven Jurisdiction. Any other gains realized on the disposition of common shares that are not carried out on the Brazilian stock exchange: · are subject to income tax at a rate of 15% when realized by any Non-Resident Holder that is not resident or domiciled in a Tax Haven Jurisdiction, whether or not such holder is a 2,689 Holder; and · are subject to income tax at a rate of up to 25% when realized by a Non-Resident Holder that is resident or domiciled in a Tax Haven Jurisdiction, whether or not such holder is a 2,689 Holder. In the cases described above, if the gains are related to transactions conducted on the Brazilian non-organized over-the-counter market with intermediation, the withholding income tax of 0.005% will also apply and can be offset against any income tax due on the capital gain. Any exercise of preemptive rights relating to common shares will not be subject to Brazilian withholding income tax. Gains realized by a Non-Resident Holder on the disposition of preemptive rights will be subject to Brazilian income tax according to the same rules applicable to disposition of common shares. In the case of a redemption of common shares or a capital reduction, the positive difference between the amount received by the Non-Resident Holder and the acquisition cost of the common shares redeemed inreais is treated as capital gain derived from the sale or exchange of shares not carried out on a Brazilian stock exchange market and is therefore subject to income tax at the rate of 15%, or 25%, as the case may be.
Table of contents Sale of ADSs by U.S. Holders to Other Non-Residents in Brazil
As discussed above, pursuant to Law No. 10,833, the sale of assets located in Brazil involving Non-Resident Holders is subject to Brazilian withholding income tax. We believe that the ADSs do not fall within the definition of assets located in Brazil for the purposes of Law No. 10,833, and, thus, should not be subject to the Brazilian withholding tax. However, due to the lack of any administrative or judicial guidance, there is no assurance that such position would prevail. Gains on the Exchange of ADSs for Common Shares The withdrawal of ADSs in exchange for common shares is not subject to Brazilian income tax, assuming compliance with applicable regulation regarding the registration of the investment with Central Bank. Gains on the Exchange of Common Shares for ADSs The deposit of common shares in exchange for the ADSs may be subject to Brazilian withholding income tax on capital gains if the amount previously registered with the Central Bank as a foreign investment in common sharesor, in the case of other market investors under Resolution No. 2,689, the acquisition cost of the common shares, as the case may be, is lower than:
Table Of Contents
· the average price per common share on the Brazilian stock exchange on which the greatest number of such common shares were sold on the day of deposit; or · if no common shares were sold on that day, the average price on the Brazilian stock exchange on which the greatest number of common shares were sold during the 15 preceding trading sessions. The difference between the amount previously registered, or the acquisition cost, as the case may be, and the average price of the common shares, calculated as set forth above, is considered a capital gain subject to income tax at a rate of 15%, or 25% if the Non-Resident Holder is resident or domiciled in a Tax Haven Jurisdiction. Tax on Financial Transactions The Tax on Financial Transactions(Imposto sobre Operações de Crédito, Câmbio e Seguro ou relativas a Títulos ou Valores Mobiliários), or “IOF”, is imposed on foreign exchange, securities, credit and insurance transactions. IOF on Foreign Exchange Transactions Tax on foreign exchange transactions, or “IOF/Exchange”, may be levied on foreign exchange transactions (conversion of foreign currency inreais and conversion ofreais into foreign currency), affecting either or both the inflow or outflow of investments. Currently, the general IOF/Exchange rate applicable to foreign currency exchange transactions is 0.38%. The Brazilian Government may increase the rate of the IOF/Exchange to a maximum rate of 25% of the amount of the foreign exchange transactions at any time, but such an increase will only apply in respect to future foreign exchange transactions. Currently, for most foreign exchange transactions related to this type of investment, the IOF/Exchange rate is zero. IOF on Bonds and Securities Transactions IOF may also be levied on transactions involving bonds and securities, or “IOF/securities(“IOF/Securities”), including those carried out on a Brazilian stock, futures or commodities exchanges. The rate of the IOF/Securities applicable to most transactions involving common shares is currently zero percent. Since November 19, 2009, the IOF/Securities levies at a rate of 1.5% on transfer of shares traded on the Brazilian stock exchange with the specific purpose of enabling the issuance of depositary receipts to be traded outside Brazil. The Brazilian Government may increase the rate of the IOF/Exchange up to 1.5% per day at any time, but such an increase will only apply in respect of future transactions.
Table of contents Other Brazilian Taxes There are no Brazilian inheritance, gift or succession taxes applicable to the ownership, transfer or disposition of common shares or ADSs by a non-Brazilian holder, except for gift and inheritance taxes which are levied by some states of Brazil on gifts made or inheritances bestowed by individuals or entities not resident or domiciled in Brazil to individuals or entities resident or domiciled within that state in Brazil. There are no Brazilian stamp, issue, registration or similar taxes or duties payable by holders of common shares or ADSs. U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations The summary discussion below is applicable to you only if you are a “U.S. Holder” (asor a “Non-U.S. Holder” (both as defined below) . This summary is based upon the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), Treasury regulations, administrative pronouncements of the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) and judicial decisions, all as in effect on the date hereof, and all of which are subject to change (possibly with retroactive effect) and to differing interpretations. This summary does not describe any implications under state, local or non-U.S. tax law, or any aspect of U.S. federal tax law (such as the estate tax, gift tax, the alternative minimum tax or the Medicare tax on net investment income) other than U.S. federal income taxation. This summary does not purport to address all the material U.S. federal income tax consequences that may be relevant to the holders of the common shares or ADSs, and does not take into account the specific circumstances of any particular investors, some of which (such as tax-exempt entities, banks or other financial institutions, insurance companies, dealers in securities or currencies, traders in securities that elect to use a mark-to-market method of accounting for their securities holdings, regulated investment companies, real estate investment trusts, investors liable for the alternative minimum tax, partnerships and other pass-through entities, U.S. expatriates, investors that own or are treated as owning 10% or more of our voting stock, investors that hold the preferred shares or ADSs as part of a straddle, hedge, conversion or constructive sale transaction or other integrated transaction and persons whose functional currency is not domiciled in Brazil (or domiciled or resident in athe U.S. dollar) may be subject to special tax haven jurisdiction) for purposes of Brazilian taxation and, in the case of a holder of common shares, that has registered its investment in common shares with the Central Bank as a U.S. dollar investment.rules.
Table Of Contents
For purposes of this discussion, a U.S. Holder is any beneficial owner of common shares or ADSs that is (i) an individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States, (ii) a corporation (or other entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) organized under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia, (iii) an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income tax without regard to its source, or (iv) a trust if a U.S. court is able to exercise primary supervision over administration of the trust and one or more U.S. persons have authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or if the trust validly elects under applicable Treasury regulations to be taxed as a U.S. person. A “Non-U.S. Holder” is any beneficial owner of common shares or ADSs that is an individual, corporation, estate or trust who is neither a U.S. Holder nor a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If a partnership holds our common shares or ADSs, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and upon the activities of the partnership. A prospective investor who is a partner of a partnership holding our shares should consult its own tax advisor. In general, and taking into account the earlier assumptions, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, holders of ADRsAmerican Depositary Receipts evidencing ADSs will be treated as the owners of the common shares represented by those ADSs, and exchanges of common shares for ADSs, and ADSs for common shares, will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax. Taxation of Dividends
U.S. Holders Under the U.S. federal income tax laws, and subject to the passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) rules discussed below, U.S. Holders will include in gross income, as dividend income, the gross amount of any distribution paid by us (including (i) payments considered “interest” in respect of stockholders’Shareholders’ equity under Brazilian law) (before reduction forlaw and (ii) amounts withheld in respect of Brazilian taxes and (iii) any additional amounts payable in respect of such withholding taxes)taxes as described above under “Brazilian Tax Considerations—Taxation of Dividends and Interest on Shareholders’ Equity”) out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes) when the distribution is actually or constructively received by the U.S. Holder, in the case of common shares, or by ourbyour ADSs depositary, in the case of ADSs. Distributions in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles, will be treated as a return of capital to the extent of the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the common shares or ADSs and thereafter as capital gain, which will be either long-term or short-term capital gain depending on whether the U.S. holder held the common shares or ADSs for more than one year. We do not intend to maintain calculations of our earnings and profits under U.S. federal income tax principles and, unless and until such calculations are made, U.S. Holders should assume all distributions are made out of earnings and profits and constitute dividend income.
Table of contents The dividend income will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction generally allowed to U.S. corporations in respect of dividends received from other U.S. corporations. Subject to certain exceptions for short-term and hedged positions certain non-corporate U.S. Holders (including individuals) may qualify for a maximum 20% rate of tax in respect of “qualified dividend income” received after December 31, 2012.received. Dividend income with respect to the ADSs will be qualified dividend income, provided that, in the year that a non-corporate U.S. Holder receives the dividend, the ADSs are readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States, and we were not in the year prior to the year in which the dividend was paid, and are not in the year in which the dividend is paid, a PFIC. Based on existing Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”)IRS guidance, it is not entirely clear whether dividends received with respect to the common shares not held through ADSs will be treated as qualified dividend income, because the common shares are not themselves listed on a U.S. exchange. The amount of the dividend distribution includible in gross income of a U.S. Holder will be the U.S. dollar value of thereal payments made, determined at the spotreal/U.S. dollar rate on the date such dividend distribution is includible in the gross income of the U.S. Holder, regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars. Generally, any gain or loss resulting from currency exchange fluctuations during the period from the date the dividend payment is includible in gross income to the date such payment is converted into U.S. dollars will be treated as ordinary income or loss from sources within the United States and will not be eligible for the special tax rate applicable to qualified dividend income. Dividends received by most U.S. holders will constitute foreign source “passive income” for foreign tax credit purposes. Subject to limitations under U.S. federal income tax law concerning credits or deductions for foreignincome taxes and certain exceptions for short-term and hedged positions, any Brazilian income tax withheld from dividends paid by us would be treated as a foreign income tax eligible for credit against a U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability (or at a U.S. Holder’s election, may be deducted in computing taxable income if the U.S. Holder has elected to deduct all foreign income taxes paid or accrued for the relevant taxable year). The rules with respect to foreign tax credits are complex and U.S. Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the availability of the foreign tax credit under their particular circumstances.
Table Of Contents
The U.S. Treasury Department has expressed concern that intermediaries in connection with depositary arrangements may be taking actions that are inconsistent with the claiming of foreign tax credits by U.S. persons who are holders of depositary shares. Accordingly, investors should be aware that the discussion above regarding the availability of foreign tax credits for Brazilian income tax withheld from dividends paid with respect to common shares represented by ADSs could be affected by future action taken by the U.S. Treasury Department. Distributions of additional common shares to U.S. Holders with respect to their common shares or ADSs that are made as part of a pro rata distribution to all our stockholdersShareholders generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax. Non-U.S. Holders Dividends paid to a Non-U.S. Holder in respect of common shares or ADSs will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax unless those dividends are effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States by the Non-U.S. Holder (and(or are attributable to a permanent establishment maintained in the United States by the Non-U.S. Holder, if an applicable income tax treaty so requires as a condition for the Non-U.S. Holder to be subject to U.S. taxation on a net income basis in respect of income from common shares or ADSs), in which case the Non-U.S. Holder generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax in respect of the dividends in the same manner as a U.S. Holder. Any such effectively connected dividends received by a corporate Non-U.S. Holder may also, under certain circumstances,certaincircumstances, be subject to an additional “branch profits tax” (at a 30% rate or at a reduced rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty).
Table of contents Taxation of Capital Gains
U.S. Holders Subject to the PFIC rules discussed below, upon a sale, redemption or other taxable disposition of common shares or ADSs, a U.S. Holder will recognize gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes in an amount equal to the difference between the U.S. dollar value of the amount realized (before deduction of any Brazilian tax) and the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis (determined in U.S. dollars) in the common shares or ADSs. Generally, thea non-corporate U.S. Holder’s gain or loss will be capital gain or loss. Capital gain of a non-corporate U.S. Holder that is recognized after December 31, 2012 is generallyloss taxed at a maximum rate of 20% where the property is held for more than one year. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations under the Code. If a Brazilian income tax is withheld on the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of common shares or ADSs, the amount realized by a U.S. Holder will include the gross amount of the proceeds of that sale, exchange or other taxable disposition before deduction of the Brazilian tax. Capital gain or loss, if any realized by a U.S. Holder on the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of common shares or ADSs generally will be treated as U.S. source gain or loss for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes. Consequently, in the case of a gain from the disposition of a share or ADS that is subject to Brazilian income tax (see “Taxation – Brazilian Tax Considerations – Taxation of Gains”), the U.S. Holder may not be able to benefit from the foreign tax credit for that Brazilian income tax (i.e., because the gain from the disposition would be U.S. source income), unless the U.S. Holder can apply the credit against U.S. federal income tax payable on other income from foreign sources. Alternatively, the U.S. Holder may be able to take a deduction for the Brazilian income tax if it does not elect to claim a foreign income tax credit for any foreign taxes paid or accrued during the taxable year.
Non-U.S. Holders. A Non-U.S. Holder will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax in respect of gain recognized on a sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of common shares or ADSs unless:
Table Of Contents
· the gain is effectively connected with a trade or business of the Non-U.S. Holder in the United States (and(or is attributable to a permanent establishment maintained in the United States by that Non-U.S. Holder, if an applicable income tax treaty so requires as a condition for that Non-U.S. Holder to be subject to U.S. taxation on a net income basis in respect of gain from the sale or other disposition of the common shares or ADSs); or · in the case of a Non-U.S. Holder who is an individual, that Non-U.S. Holder is present in the United States for 183 or more days in the taxable year of the sale and certain other conditions apply. Effectively connected gains realized by a corporate Non-U.S. Holder may also, under certain circumstances, be subject to an additional branch profits tax (at a 30% rate or at a reduced rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty). Passive Foreign Investment Companies Based on current estimates of our gross income, gross assets and the nature of our business, we believe that our common shares and ADSs should not be treated as stock of a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes. There can be no assurances in this regard, however, because the application of the relevant rules is complex and involves some uncertainty. The PFIC determination is made annually and is based on the portion of our assets and income that is characterized as passive under the PFIC rules. Moreover, our business plans may change, which may affect the PFIC determination in future years. In general, we will be a PFIC with respect to a U.S. Holder if, for any taxable year in which the U.S. Holder held our ADSs or common shares, either (i) at least 75% of our gross income for the taxable year is passive income or (ii) at least 50% of the value (determined on the basis of a quarterly average) of our assets is attributable to assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income. For this purpose, passive income generally includes, among other things, dividends, interest, royalties, rents (other than certain rents and royalties derived in the active conduct of a trade or business), annuities and gains from assets that produce passive income. If a foreignnon-U.S. corporation owns at least 25% by value of the stockthestock of another corporation, the foreignnon-U.S. corporation is treated for purposes of the PFIC tests as owning its proportionate share of the assets of the other corporation, and as receiving directly its proportionate share of the other corporation’s income.
Table of contents If we are treated as a PFIC, a U.S. Holder that did not make a “mark-to-market election” or “QEF election,” each as described below, would be subject to special rules with respect to (a) any gain realized on the sale or other disposition of common shares or ADSs and (b) any “excess distribution” by CSN to the U.S. Holder (generally, any distributions to the U.S. Holder in respect of the common shares or ADSs during a single taxable year that are greater than 125% of the average annual distributions received by the U.S. Holder with respect to the common shares or ADSs during the three preceding taxable years or, if shorter, the U.S. Holder’s holding period for the common shares or ADSs). Under these rules, (i) the gain or excess distribution would be allocated ratably over the U.S. Holder’s holding period for the common shares or ADSs, (ii) the amount allocated to the taxable year in which the gain or excess distribution was realized would be taxable as ordinary income, (iii) the amount allocated to each prior year, with certain exceptions, would be subject to tax at the highest tax rate in effect for that year and (iv) the interest charge generally applicable to underpayments of tax would be imposed in respect of the tax attributable to each such prior year. If we are treated as a PFIC and, at any time, we invest in non-U.S. corporations that are classified as PFICs (each, a “Subsidiary PFIC”), U.S. Holders generally will be deemed to own, and also would be subject to the PFIC rules with respect to, their indirect ownership interest in that Subsidiary PFIC. If we are treated as a PFIC, a U.S. Holder could incur liability for the deferred tax and interest charge described above if either (1) we receive a distribution from, or dispose of all or part of our interest in, the Subsidiary PFIC or (2) the U.S. Holder disposes of all or part of its common shares or ADSs. The special PFIC tax rules described above will not apply to a U.S. Holder if the U.S. Holder makes an election (i) to “mark-to-market” with respect to the common shares or ADSs (a “mark-to-market election”) or (ii) to have us treated as a “qualified electing fund” (a “QEF election”). The QEF election is not available to holders unless we agree to comply with certain reporting requirements and provide the required annual information statements. The QEF and mark-to-market elections only apply to taxable years in which the U.S. Holder’s common shares or ADSsare treated as stock of a PFIC. Our ADR Depositary has agreed to distribute the necessary information to registered holders of ADSs.
Table Of Contents
A U.S. Holder may make a mark-to-market election, if the common shares or ADSs are regularly traded“regularly traded” on a “qualified exchange.” Under applicable U.S. Treasury regulations, a “qualified exchange” includes a national securities exchange, such as the New York Stock Exchange, that is registered with the SEC or the national market system established under the Exchange Act. Also, under applicable Treasury Regulations, PFIC securities traded on a qualified exchange are regularly traded on such exchange for any calendar year during which such stock is traded, other than inde minimis quantities, on at least 15 days during each calendar quarter. We cannot assure you that the common shares or ADSs will be eligible for a mark-to-market election. A U.S. Holder that makes a mark-to-market election with respect to its ADSs must include for each taxable year in which the U.S. Holder’s common shares or ADSs are treated as shares of a PFIC, as ordinary income, an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the common shares or ADSs at the close of the taxable year over the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the common shares or ADSs, and is allowed an ordinary loss for the excess, if any, of the adjusted tax basis over the fair market value of the common shares or ADSs at the close of the taxable year, but only to the extent of the amount of previously included mark-to-market inclusions (not offset by prior mark-to-market losses). These amounts of ordinary income, and any gain recognized on the sale, redemption or other taxable disposition of an ADS with respect to which such an election is in place, will not be eligible for the favorable tax rates applicable to qualified dividend income or long-term capital gains. A U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the common shares or ADSs will be adjusted to reflect any such income or loss amounts.amounts on its annual inclusions. Although a U.S. Holder may be eligible to make a mark-to-market election with respect to its common shares or ADSs, no such election may be made with respect to the stock of any Subsidiary PFIC that such U.S. Holder is treated as owning, because such Subsidiary PFIC stock is not marketable. Thus, the mark-to-market election will not be effective to avoid all of the adverse tax consequences described above with respect to any Subsidiary PFICs. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the availability and advisability of making a mark-to-market election with respect to their common shares of ADSs based on their particular circumstances.
Table of contents A U.S. Holder that makes a QEF election will be currently taxable on its pro rata share of our ordinary earnings and net capital gain (at ordinary income and long-term capital gain rates, respectively) for each of our taxable years, regardless of whether we distributed the income and gain. The U.S. Holder’s basis in the common shares or ADSs will be increased to reflect taxed but undistributed income. Distributions of income that had previously been taxed will result in a corresponding reduction of tax basis in the common shares or ADSs and will not be taxed again as a distribution to the U.S. Holder. In addition, notwithstanding any election that a U.S. Holder makes with regard to the common shares or ADSs, dividends that a non-corporate U.S. Holder receives from us will not constitute qualified dividend income if we are a PFIC either in the taxable year of the distribution or the preceding taxable year. Special rules apply with respect to the calculation of the amount of the foreign tax credit with respect to excess distributions by a PFIC or, in certain cases, QEF inclusions. A U.S. Holder who owns common shares or ADSs during any taxable year that we are a PFIC mustin excess of certain de minimus amounts and fails to qualify for certain other exemptions would be required to file IRS Form 8621. In addition, under certain circumstances, the temporary regulations also require a “United States person” (as such term is defined in the Code) that owns an interest in a PFIC as an indirect shareholder through one or more United States persons to file Form 8621 for any taxable year during which such indirect shareholder is treated as receiving an excess distribution in connection with the ownership or disposition of such interest, or reports income pursuant to a mark-to-market or QEF election, among other circumstances. U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of the PFIC rules to the common shares or ADSs. Backup Withholding and Information Reporting
U.S. Holders Dividends paid on, and proceeds from the sale, redemption or other taxable disposition of common shares or ADSs toreceived by a U.S. Holder generally will be subject to information reporting and backup withholding, unless, in the case of backup withholding, the U.S. Holder provides an accurate taxpayer identification number or in either case otherwise establishes an exemption. The amount of any backup withholding collected from a payment to a U.S. Holder will be allowed as a credit against the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle the U.S. Holder to a refund, provided that certain required information is timely furnished to the IRS. Recently enacted legislation requires certain U.S. Holders to report information with respect to their investment in certain “foreign financial assets,” which would include an investment in our common shares, not held through acustodial account with a U.S. financial institution to the IRS. Investors who fail to report required information could become subject to substantial penalties. Prospective investors are encouraged to consult with their own tax advisors regarding the possible implications of this new legislation on their investment in our common shares.
Table Of Contents
Non-U.S. Holders If common shares are held by a Non-U.S. Holder through the non-U.S. office of a non-U.S. related broker or financial institution, backup withholding and information reporting generally would not be required. Information reporting, and possibly backup withholding, may apply if the common shares are held by a Non-U.S. Holder through a U.S., or U.S.-related, broker or financial institution, or the U.S. office of a non-U.S. broker or financial institution and the Non-U.S. Holder fails to provide appropriate information. Information reporting and backup withholding generally will apply with respect to ADSs if the Non-U.S. Holder fails to timely provide appropriate information. Non-U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the application of these rules.
“Specified Foreign Financial Asset” Reporting Owners of “specified foreign financial assets” with an aggregate value in excess of U.S.$50,000 (and in some circumstances, a higher threshold), may be required to file an information report with respect to such assets with their U.S. federal income tax returns. “Specified foreign financial assets” generally include any financial accounts maintained by foreign financial institutions as well as any of the following, but only if they are not held in accounts maintained by financial institutions: (i) stocks and securities issued by non-U.S. persons, (ii) financial instruments and contracts held for investment that have non-U.S. issuers or counterparties and (iii) interests in foreign entities.
Table of contents Prospective purchasers should consult their own tax advisors regarding the application of the U.S. federal income tax laws to their particular situations as well as any additional tax consequences resulting from purchasing, holding or disposing of common shares or ADSs, including the applicability and effect of the tax laws of any state, local or foreign jurisdiction, including estate, gift, and inheritance laws. 10F. Dividends and Paying Agents Not applicable. 10G. Statement by Experts Not applicable. 10H. Documents on Display We are subject to the information requirements of the Exchange Act and accordingly file reports and other information with the SEC. Reports and other information filed by us with the SEC may be inspected and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You can obtain further information about the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Our SEC filings are also available to the public from the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. You may also inspect our reports and other information at the offices of the NYSE, 11 Wall Street , New York, New York 10005, on which our ADSs are listed. For further information on obtaining copies of our public filings at the NYSE, you should call (212) 656-5060. We also file financial statements and other periodic reports with the CVM. 10I. Subsidiary Information Not required. Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk We are exposed to a number of different market risks arising from our normal business activities. Market risk is the possibility that changes in interest rates, currency exchange rates, commodities prices willcould adversely affect the value of financial assets, liabilities, expected future cash flows or earnings. We developed policies aimed at managing the volatility inherent to certain of these natural businessexposures. We use financial instruments, such as derivatives, in order to achieve the main goals established by our Board of Directors to minimize the cost of capital and maximize the returns on financial assets, while observing, as determined by our Board of Directors, parameters of credit and risk. Derivatives are contracts whose value is derived from one or more underlying financial instruments, indices or prices defined in the contract. Only well-understood, conventional derivative instruments are used for these purposes. These include futures and options traded on regulated exchanges and “over-the-counter” swaps, options and forward contracts. Market Risk Exposures and Market Risk Management Our treasury department is responsible for managing our market risk exposures. We use some internal controls in order to: · help us understand market risks; · reduce the likelihood of financial losses; and
Table Of Contents
· diminish the volatility of financial results. The principal tools used by our treasury department are: · “Sensitivity Analysis,” which measures the impact that movements in the price of different market variables such as interest rates and exchange rates will have in our earnings and cash flows; and · “Stress Testing,” which measures the worst possible loss from a set of consistent scenarios to which probabilities are not assigned. The scenarios are deliberately chosen to include extreme changes in interest and currency exchange rates.
Table of contents Following is a discussion of the primary market risk exposures that we face together with an analysis of the exposure to each one of them. Interest Rate Risk We are exposed to interest rate risk on short- and long-term instruments and as a result of refinancing of fixed-rate instruments included in our consolidated debt. Consequently, as well as managing the currency and maturity of debt, we manage interest costs through a balance between lower-cost floating rate debt, which has inherently higher risk, and more expensive, but lower risk, fixed-rate debt. We can use swaps, options and other derivatives to achieve the desired ratio between floating-rate debt and fixed-rate debt. The desired ratio varies according to market conditions: if interest rates are relatively low, we will shift towards fixed rate debt. We are basically exposed to the following floating interest rates: · U.S. dollar LIBOR, due to our floating rate U.S. dollar-denominated debt (usually trade-finance related), to our cash position held offshore in U.S. dollars, which is invested in short-term instruments, · TJLP (Long Term Interest Rate), due toreal-denominated debt indexed to this interest rate, and · CDI (benchmark Brazilianreal overnight rate), due to our cash held in Brazil (onshore cash) and to our CDI indexed debt. Maturities | Exposure as of December 2015* (amortization) | | Notional amount | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2020 | | Thereafter | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | U.S. dollar LIBOR | | 6,512 | | 449 | | 605 | | 881 | | 1,693 | | 1,976 | | 908 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | U.S. dollar fixed rate | | 11,103 | | 287 | | - | | - | | 2,801 | | 4,110 | | 3,905 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CDI | | 14,496 | | 345 | | 680 | | 4,728 | | 3,078 | | 2,361 | | 3,304 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Euro fixed rate | | 510 | | 102 | | 102 | | 102 | | 102 | | 102 | | - | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | TJLP | | 1,052 | | 40 | | 57 | | 57 | | 66 | | 60 | | 772 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Other | | 141 | | 104 | | 15 | | 11 | | 3 | | 3 | | 5 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Maturities | | Maturities | Exposure as of December 2014* (amortization) | | | Notional amount | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | Thereafter | | | | | Maturities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Exposure as of December 2012* (amortization) | | Notional amount | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | Thereafter | | U.S. dollar LIBOR | | | 4,364 | | 328 | | 539 | | 645 | | 373 | | 1,191 | | 1,288 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | US dollar LIBOR | | 2,190 | | 194 | | 367 | | 467 | | 626 | | 536 | | - | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | US dollar fixed rate | | 8,135 | | 1,168 | | 31 | | 837 | | 57 | | 6 | | 6,036 | | U.S. dollar fixed rate | | | 8,760 | | 1,108 | | - | | - | | - | | 11,992 | | 5,660 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CDI | | 15,061 | | 113 | | 2,228 | | 2,257 | | 2,174 | | 2,595 | | 5,694 | | 14,879 | | 783 | | 2,207 | | 3,380 | | 4,011 | | 2,694 | | 1,804 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Euro fixed rate | | 323 | | - | | - | | - | | 65 | | 65 | | 194 | | 385 | | - | | 77 | | 77 | | 77 | | 77 | | 77 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | TJLP | | 3,350 | | 415 | | 215 | | 235 | | 249 | | 243 | | 1,994 | | 1,003 | | 53 | | 61 | | 61 | | 61 | | 77 | | 690 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Other | | 646 | | 57 | | 59 | | 71 | | 84 | | 59 | | 317 | | 79 | | 36 | | 21 | | 7 | | 6 | | 2 | | 7 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Maturities | | Exposure as of December 2011* (amortization) | | Notional amount | | 2012 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | Thereafter | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | US dollar LIBOR | | 2,444 | | 547 | | 178 | | 308 | | 400 | | 547 | | 464 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | US dollar fixed rate | | 7,362 | | 298 | | 1,071 | | 14 | | 756 | | 52 | | 5,171 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CDI | | 14,008 | | 1,045 | | 546 | | 1,446 | | 1,041 | | 1,707 | | 8,223 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | TJLP | | 3,231 | | 382 | | 335 | | 101 | | 90 | | 95 | | 2,228 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Other | | 495 | | 26 | | 43 | | 65 | | 60 | | 43 | | 258 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
*All figures in R$ million.
Table Of Contentsof contents Our cash and cash equivalent were as follows: | | December 31, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 | | Exposure | | December 31, 2015 | | December 31, 2014 | | Exposure | Cash inreais: | | 1,956 | | 2,690 | | CDI | | 1,488 | | 747 | | CDI | Cash in U.S. dollars: | | 6,111 | | 6,784 | | LIBOR | | 2,399 | | 2,989 | | LIBOR |
The table below shows the average interest rate and the average life of our debt. | | | December 2015 | | | December 2014 | | | Average rate % | | Average life | | Average rate % | | Average life | U.S. dollar LIBOR | | 3 | | 3.62 | | 3.08 | | 4.26 | U.S. dollar fixed rate | | 7.15 | | 14,58 (with perpetual bond) | | 7.15 | | 15.58 (with perpetual bond) | Euro fixed rate | | 3.88 | | 2.09 | | 3.88 | | 3.09 | Real Fixed | | 8 | | 0.82 | | 8 | | 1.14 | CDI | | 112.54% of CDI | | 4,07 | | 111.11% of CDI | | 3.54 | TJLP | | 1.36 | | 9,79 | | 1.36 | | 7.89 |
| | December 2012 | | December 2011 | | | Average rate % | | Average life | | Average rate % | | Average life | U.S. dollar LIBOR | | 2.72 | | 2.99 | | 3.14 | | 3.20 | U.S. dollar fixed rate | | 7.52 | | 13.83 (with perpetual bond) | | 6.37 | | 14.37 (with perpetual bond) | Euro fixed rate | | 3.88 | | 5.16 | | N/A | | N/A | UMBNDES | | N/A | | N/A | | N/A | | N/A | CDI | | 110,69 of CDI | | 4.38 | | 111.21 of CDI | | 5.19 | TJLP | | 1.68 | | 7.65 | | 1.70 | | 5.58 |
We entered into cross-currencyconduct Non Deliverable Forward (NDF) agreements to ensure the forward purchase of U.S. dollars, which are settled, without physical delivery, by the difference in contracted R$/U.S.$ buy parity against the R$/U.S.$ sell parity, with is the Sale Ptax T-1 to maturity and exchange swap agreements to hedge liabilities indexed to the U.S. dollar from Brazilianreal fluctuations, which are affected by market, economic, political, regulatory and geopolitical conditions, among others. The gains and losses from these contracts are directly related to exchange (dollar) and CDI fluctuations. For the duration of our U.S. dollar fixed-rate derivatives, see tables below.below: December 31, 2015 | | | | | | | | | (in million, unless otherwise indicated) | | Functional Currency | | Notional Amount | | Average Interest | | Average Maturity(days) | Dollar future-to-real | | U.S. Dollar | | 1,435 | | - | | 30 | | | | | | | | | | Hedge accounting of export | | U.S. Dollar | | 1,558 | | - | | | | | | | | | | | | Hedge accounting net investment | | Euro | | 120 | | - | | | | | | | | | | | | CDI-to-fixed rate interest rate swap | | Real | | 150 | | - | | 61 | | | | | | | | | | Fixed rate-to-CDI interest rate swap | | Real | | 345 | | - | | 61 |
| | Notional | | Average interest rate | | Average maturity | As of December 31, 2012 | | (in U.S. dollar million, | | (U.S. dollar) | | (days) | | | unless otherwise indicated) | | | | | Swaps (U.S. dollar fixed - rate versus CDI) | | 10 | | 3.5% | | 732 | | | | | | | Notional | | Average interest rate | | Average maturity | As of December 31, 2011 | | (in U.S. dollar million, | | (U.S. dollar) | | (days) | | | unless otherwise indicated) | | | | | Swaps (U.S. dollar fixed - rate versus CDI) | | 293 | | 3.45% | | 782 | Swaps (U.S. dollar fixed - rate versus CDI) | | 75 | | 3.23% | | 691 | Swaps (U.S. dollar fixed - rate versus CDI) | | (100) | | 2.39% | | 32 |
Table of contents December 31, 2014 | | | | | | | | | (In million, unless otherwise indicated) | | Functional Currency | | Notional Amount | | Average Interest | | Average Maturity (days | Dollar-to-CDI swap | | U.S. Dollar | | 10 | | - | | 2 | | | | | | | | | | Dollar-to-real swap (NDF) | | U.S. Dollar | | 1.218 | | - | | 20 | | | | | | | | | | Dollar-to-euro swap (NDF) | | Euro | | 90 | | - | | 9 | | | | | | | | | | Fixed rate-to-CDI interest rate swap | | Real | | 345 | | - | | 417 | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2013 | | | | | | | | | (In million, unless otherwise indicated) | | Functional Currency | | Notional Amount | | Average Interest | | Average Maturity (days | Dollar-to-CDI swap | | U.S. Dollar | | 110 | | - | | 116 | | | | | | | | | | Dollar-to-real swap (NDF) | | U.S. Dollar | | 293 | | - | | 128 | | | | | | | | | | Dollar-to-euro swap | | U.S. Dollar | | 11,8 | | - | | 102 | | | | | | | | | | Dollar-to-euro swap (NDF) | | Euro | | 90 | | - | | 50 | | | | | | | | | | LIBOR-to-CDI interest rate swap | | U.S. Dollar | | 21,5 | | 1.25% | | 132 | | | | | | | | | | Fixed rate-to-CDI interest rate swap | | Real | | 345 | | - | | 782 |
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk Fluctuations in exchange rates can have significant effects on our operating results. Therefore, exchange rate fluctuations affect the values of ourreal-denominated assets, the carrying and repayment costs of ourreal-denominated financial liabilities, ourreal-denominated production costs, the cost ofreal-denominated capital items and the prices we receive in the Brazilian market for our finished steel products. We attempt to manage our net foreign exchange rate exposures, trying to balance our non-real denominated assets with our non-real denominated liabilities. We use derivative instruments to match our non-real denominated assets to our non-real denominated liabilities, but at any given time we may still have significant foreign currency exchange rate risk exposure. Our exposure to the U.S. dollar is due to the following contract categories: · U.S. dollar-denominated debt;
Table of contents
Table Of Contents
· currency derivatives (in the case of options, we use the delta as a measure of exposure);derivatives; · U.S. dollar indexed accounts payable and receivable (usually related to international trade, i.e., imports and exports); and · offshore investments: assets that we bought offshore and that are denominated in U.S. dollars on our balance sheet. | | December 31, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 | | December 31, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | U.S. dollar Liabilities | | | | | | | loans and financing | | 5,103 | | 5,300 | | trade accounts payable | | 267 | | 11 | | Loans and financing | | | 4,570 | 4,999 | Trade accounts payable | | | 20 | 218 | Intercompany loans | | 14 | | 14 | | 0 | 17 | Others | | 37 | | 43 | | 25 | 19 | Total Liabilities | | 5,421 | | 5,367 | | 4,615 | 5,253 | | | | | U.S. dollar Assets | | | | | | | offshore cash and cash equivalents | | 6,106 | | 5,613 | | guarantee margin | | 200 | | 217 | | trade accounts receivable | | 348 | | 288 | | advances to suppliers | | 12 | | 61 | | Offshore cash and cash equivalents | | | 1,625 | 2,943 | Guarantee margin | | | - | Trade accounts receivable | | | 170 | 203 | Advances to suppliers | | | - | Intercompany loans | | 62 | | 62 | | 0 | 137 | Other | | 3 | | 16 | | 0 | 0,2 | Total Assets | | 6,731 | | 6,257 | | 1,795 | 3,283 | | | | | | | | Total U.S. dollar Exposure | | 1,310 | | 890 | | -2,820 | -1,970 | | | | | | | | Derivative notional | | 67 | | 268 | | 1,465 | 1,228 | Cash Flow – Hedge Accounting | | | 1.558 | 775 | | | | | | | | Total U.S. dollar Net Exposure | | 1,377 | | 1,158 | | 173 | 33 |
·Our exposure to the Euro is due to the following contract categories: · Euro-denominated debt; · offshore cash; · U.S. dollar indexed accounts payable and receivable (usually related to international trade, i.e., imports and exports); and · offshore investments: assets that we bought offshore and that are denominated in Euros on our balance sheet | December 31, 2015 | | December 31, 2014 | Euro Liabilities | | | | Loans and financing | 122 | | 121 | Trade accounts payable | 5 | | 6 | Others | 92 | | 44 | Total Liabilities | 219 | | 171 | | | | | Euro Assets | | | | Offshore cash and cash equivalents | 5 | | 5 | Trade accounts receivable | 7 | | 10 | Intercompany loans | - | | - | Advances to suppliers | - | | - | Other | 21 | | 12 | Total Assets | 33 | | 27 | | | | | Total Euro Exposure | -186 | | -144 | | | | | Derivative notional | 0 | | -90 | Investment – Hedge Accounting | 120 | | | Total Euro Net Exposure | -66 | | -234 |
| | December 31, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 | Euro Liabilities | | | | | loans and financing | | 121 | | - | trade accounts payable | | - | | 1 | Intercompany loans | | - | | - | Others | | - | | - | Total Liabilities | | 121 | | 1 | | Euro Assets | | | | | offshore cash and cash equivalents | | 3 | | - | guarantee margin | | - | | - | trade accounts receivable | | 32 | | 8 | Intercompany loans | | 92 | | - | advances to suppliers | | 1 | | - | Other | | 37 | | - | Total Assets | | 165 | | 8 | | | | | | Total Euro Exposure | | 44 | | 7 | | | | | | Derivative notional | | (90) | | (90) | | | | | | Total Euro Net Exposure | | (46) | | (83) |
Table Of Contentsof contents
Our exposure to the Australian Dollar is due to the following contract categories:
·offshore cash.
| | December 31, 2012
| | December 31, 2011
| AUD Liabilities
| | -
| | -
| | AUD Assets
| | -
| | | offshore cash and cash equivalents
| | -
| | 303
|
| |
| | 303
|
| |
| |
| Total AUD Exposure
| | -
| | 303
| | | | | |
Offshore investments We have capitalized our offshore subsidiaries domiciled in U.S. dollar-based countries with equity investments, and those investments are accounted as U.S. dollar investments. The result is that they work as assets indexed to the U.S. dollar from an earnings perspective. Commodity Price Risk Fluctuations in the price of steel and some of the commodities used in producing steel, such as zinc, aluminum, tin, coal, coke and energy, can have an impact on our earnings. Currently, we are not hedging our exposure to commodity prices. Our biggest commodity price exposure is the price of steel and coal, but there are no liquid instruments that provide an effective hedge against their price fluctuations. Sensitivity analysis The economic environment in which we operate determines the main factors taken into consideration to establish risk scenarios. In the Brazilian economic environment, exchange rate variation is the most notable market risk. Thereal exchange rate is significantly volatile. Between 20032004 and 20122015, the exchange rate had an average annual volatility of 14.79%.around 14.8 %. ·Sensitivity analysis of the US dollar-to-real exchange swap
For the consolidated foreign exchange operations with US Dollar Fluctuation risk, the sensitivity analysis is based on the assumption of maintaining, as a probable scenario, the fair values as of 31 December, 2012 recorded as assets in the amount of R$9,046 million.
Table Of Contents
To develop our sensitivity analysis we analyze four different scenarios of exchange rate variation. Based on the foreign exchange rate of December 31, 2012 of R$2.0435 per US$1.00, adjustments were estimated for four scenarios: scenario 1: (25% of Real appreciation) rate of R$1.5326 per US$1.00; scenario 2: (50% of Real appreciation) rate of R$1.0218 per US$1.00; scenario 3: (25% of Real devaluation) rate of R$ 2.5544; scenario 4: (50% of Real devaluation) rate of R$ 3.0653.
December 31, 2012 (In millions of US$, except for exchange rates) | | | | | | | | | | | | Risk | | Scenario | | Reference Value | | Exchange Rates | | Additional Results | Net current swap | | US Dollar fluctuation | | | | 67 | | 2.0435 | | - | | | | | 1 | | | | 1.5326 | | (34) | | | | | 2 | | | | 1.0218 | | (68) | | | | | 3 | | | | 2.5544 | | 34 | | | | | 4 | | | | 3.0653 | | 68 | | | | | | | | | | | | Exchange position functional currency BRL | | US Dollar fluctuation | | | | 1,310 | | 2.0435 | | - | | | | | 1 | | | | 1.5326 | | (669) | | | | | 2 | | | | 1.0218 | | (1,339) | | | | | 3 | | | | 2.5544 | | 669 | | | | | 4 | | | | 3.0653 | | 1,339 | | | | | | | | | | | | Consolidated exchange position | | US Dollar fluctuation | | | | 1,377 | | 2.0435 | | - | | | | | 1 | | | | 1.5326 | | (703) | | | | | 2 | | | | 1.0218 | | (1,407) | | | | | 3 | | | | 2.5544 | | 703 | | | | | 4 | | | | 3.0653 | | 1,407 |
·Sensitivity analysis of the euro-to-dollar exchange swap
For the consolidated foreign exchange operations with Euro fluctuation risk, the sensitivity analysis is based on the assumption of maintaining, as a probable scenario, the fair valuesas of 31 December, 2012 recorded as liabilities in the amount of R$2,441 million.
For consolidated exchange transactions with Euro fluctuation risk, based on the foreign exchange rate on December 31, 2012, of R$ 2.6954 per €$ 1.00, adjustments were estimated for four scenarios: scenario 1: (25% of Real appreciation) rate of R$2.0216 per €$ 1.00; scenario 2: (50% of Real appreciation) rate of R$1.3477 per €$ 1.00; scenario 3: (25% of Real devaluation) rate of R$ 3.3693; scenario 4: (50% of Real devaluation) rate of R$ 4.0431.
December 31, 2012 (In millions of EUR, except for exchange rates) | | | | | | | | | | | | Risk | | Scenario | | Reference Value | | Exchange Rates | | Additional Results | Net current swap | | EURO fluctuation | | | | (90) | | 2.6954 | | | | | | | 1 | | | | 2.0216 | | 61 | | | | | 2 | | | | 1.3477 | | 121 | | | | | 3 | | | | 3.3693 | | (61) | | | | | 4 | | | | 4.0431 | | (121) | | | | | | | | | | | | Exchange position functional currency BRL | | EURO fluctuation | | | | 44 | | 2.6954 | | | | | | | 1 | | | | 2.0216 | | (30) | | | | | 2 | | | | 1.3477 | | (59) | | | | | 3 | | | | 3.3693 | | 30 | | | | | 4 | | | | 4.0431 | | 59 | | | | | | | | | | | | Consolidated exchange position | | EURO fluctuation | | | | (46) | | 2.6954 | | | | | | | 1 | | | | 2.0216 | | 31 | | | | | 2 | | | | 1.3477 | | 62 | | | | | 3 | | | | 3.3693 | | (31) | | | | | 4 | | | | 4.0431 | | (62) |
Table Of Contents
·Sensitivity analysis of exchange dollar-to-euro swapDerivative Financial Instruments and Foreign Exchange Exposure
The sensitivity analysis is based onCompany considered scenarios (1 and 2) are 25% and 50% to the assumption of maintaining,underlying asset appreciation, using as a probable scenario,benchmark the fair values closing exchange rate as of December 31, 2012 recognized2015. The currencies used in liabilities, amounting to R$4,241 million. To develop ourthe sensitivity analysis we analyze four differentand the respective scenarios for the real-euro parity volatility. Based on the foreign exchange rate of December 31, 2012 of R$1.3190 per US$1.00, adjustments were estimated for four scenarios: scenario 1: (25% of Real appreciation) rate of R$0.9893 per US$1.00; scenario 2: (50% of Real appreciation) rate of R$0.6595 per US$1.00; scenario 3: (25% of Real devaluation) rate of R$ 1.6488; scenario 4: (50% of Real devaluation) rate of R$ 1.9785.are as follows:
| | | | | | | December 31, 2015 | Currency | Exchange rate | Problable scenario | | Scenario 1 | | Scenario 2 | Dollar to real | 3.9048 | | 3.9116 | | 4.881 | | 5.8572 | Euro to real | 4.2504 | | 4.2359 | | 5.313 | | 6.3756 | Dollar to euro | 1.0887 | | 1.0856 | | 1.3609 | | 1.6331 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | December 31, 2015 | Interest | Interest rate | Scenario 1 | | Scenario 2 | | | CDI | 14.14% | | 18.87% | | 22.64% | | |
December 31, 2012 (In millions of US$, except for exchange rates) | | | | | | | | | | | | Risk | | Scenario | | Reference Value | | Exchange Rates | | Additional Results | Net current swap | | US Dollar fluctuation | | | | 44 | | 1.3190 | | | | | | | 1 | | | | 0.9893 | | (15) | | | | | 2 | | | | 0.6595 | | (29) | | | | | 3 | | | | 1.6488 | | 15 | | | | | 4 | | | | 1.9785 | | 29 | | | | | | | | | | | | Exchange position functional currency EURO | | US Dollar fluctuation | | | | (6) | | 1.3190 | | | | | | | 1 | | | | 0.9893 | | 2 | | | | | 2 | | | | 0.6595 | | 4 | | | | | 3 | | | | 1.6488 | | (2) | | | | | 4 | | | | 1.9785 | | (4) | | | | | | | | | | | | Consolidated exchange position | | US Dollar fluctuation | | | | 38 | | 1.3190 | | | | | | | 1 | | | | 0.9893 | | (13) | | | | | 2 | | | | 0.6595 | | (25) | | | | | 3 | | | | 1.6488 | | 13 | | | | | 4 | | | | 1.9785 | | 25 |
Table Of Contentsof contents Instruments | Notional amount | Risk | Probable scenario (*) | Scenario 1 | Scenario 2 | Dollar future-to-real | 1,435,000 | Dollar | 9.758 | 1,400,847 | 2,801,694 | Hedge accounting of exports | 1,557,667 | Dollar | 10.592 | 1,520,595 | 3,041,190 | Exchange position functional currency BRL | -2,819,845 | Dollar | -19.175 | -2,752,733 | -5,505,466 | (not including exchange derivatives above) | | | | | | | | | | | | Consolidated exchange position | 172,822 | Dollar | 1.175 | 168,709 | 337,418 | (including exchange derivatives above) | | | | | | Hedge accounting net investment | 120,000 | Euro | -1.74 | 127,511 | 255,022 | Exchange position functional currency BRL | -186,098 | Euro | 2,698 | -197,747 | -395,494 | (not including exchange derivatives above) | | | | | | | | | | | | Consolidated exchange position | -66,098 | Euro | 958 | -70,236 | -140,472 | (including exchange derivatives above) | | | | | | Dollar-to-euro swap | 58,150 | Dollarr | 152,522 | -10,682 | -17,804 |
(*) The likely scenarios were calculated considering the following changes to the risk : Real x Dollar - real devaluation of 0.17 % / Real x Euro - Real appreciated 0.34% / Dollar vs. Euro - Dollar appreciation of 0.28 % . Source: Central Bank of Brazil and quotations European Central Bank at march 02, 2016 Sensitivity analysis of interest rate swaps In millions of R$, except for notional amountThe Company considered scenarios (1 and 2) are 25% and 50% on interest rate (CDI) appreciation on December 31, 2015.
| Notional | | | | | | | | | | 12/31/2012 | | Million US$ | | Risk | | 25% | | 50% | | 25% | | 50% | Swap of interest rate libor vs CDI | 64 | | (Libor) US$ | | (8) | | (10) | | 8 | | 10 |
| | | | | | | | | 12/31/2015 | Instruments | Notional amount | | Risk | | Probable scenario (*) | | Scenario 1 | | Scenario 2 | | | | | | | | | | | Fixed rate-to-CDI interest rate swap | 345,000 | | CDI | | -26,257 | | -5,456 | | -10,806 | | | | | | | | | | | Dollar-to-CDI interest rate swap | 150,000 | | CDI | | 870 | | 2,208 | | 4,375 |
· Sensitivity analysis of changes in interest rate The Company considersconsidered the effectsscenarios 1 and 2 to 25% and 50 % growth to volatility of a 5% increase or decrease in interest rates on its outstanding borrowings, financing and debentures December 31,2015 . In millions of R$ (in million of Reais) | | | | | Impact on profit or loss | Changes in interest rates | | % p.a | | Probable scenario (*) | | Scenario 1 | Scenario 2 | TJLP | | 7 | | -43.3 | | -18.5 | | -36.9 | Libor | | 0.85 | | -449 | | -13.8 | | -27.6 | CDI | | 14.14 | | 1,360 | | -446.8 | | -893.6 |
Table of contents ( * ) The sensitivity analysis is based on the premise of keeping as probable scenario the market values as of December 31, 20122015 recorded in assets and liabilities of the consolidated financial statements.company. In millions of R$·
| Impact on profit or loss | | % p.a | | 2012 | | 2011 | Changes in interest | | | | | | TJLP | 5.50 | | 9,667 | | 1,372 | Libor | 0.51 | | 6,607 | | 7,941 | CDI | 6.90 | | 50,391 | | 72,607 |
Share market price risk ·The Company is exposed to the risk of changes in equity prices due to the investments made and classified as available-for-sale.
The Company considers as probable scenario the amounts recognized at market prices as of December 31, 2012. Sensitivity analysis is based on the assumption of maintaining as probable scenario the market values as of December 31, 2012. Therefore, there is no impact on the financial instruments classified as available for sale already presented above. The Company considered the following scenarios for volatility of the shares.
- Scenario 1: (25% appreciation of shares);
- Scenario 2: (50% appreciation of shares);
- Scenario 3: (25% devaluation of shares);
- Scenario 4: (50% devaluation of shares).
| Impact on profit or loss | Companies | Probable | | 25% | | 50% | | 25% | | 50% | Usiminas | 731 | | 200 | | 401 | | (200) | | (401) | Panatlântica | 1 | | 3 | | 5 | | (3) | | (5) | | 732 | | 203 | | 406 | | (203) | | (406) |
Table Of Contents
Item 12. Description of Securities Other Than Equity Securities American Depositary Shares JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. serves as the depositary for our ADSs. ADR holders are required to pay various fees to the depositary, and the depositary may refuse to provide any service for which a fee is assessed until the applicable fee has been paid. ADR holders are required to pay the depositary amounts in respect of expenses incurred by the depositary or its agents on behalf of ADR holders, including expenses arising from compliance with applicable law, taxes or other governmental charges, facsimile transmission or conversion of foreign currency into U.S. dollars. In this case, the depositary may decide at its sole discretion to seek payment by either billing holders or by deducting the fee from one or more cash dividends or other cash distributions. ADR holders are also required to pay additional fees for certain services provided by the depositary, as set forth in the table below. Depositary service | | Fee payable by ADR holders | Issuance and delivery of ADRs, including in connection with share distributions, stock splits | | US$U.S.$5.00 for each 100 ADSs (or portion thereof)
| Distribution of dividends
| | US$5.00 for each 100 ADSs
| Deposit of securities, including in respect of share, rights and other distributions | | US$U.S.$5.00 for each 100 ADSs (or portion thereof)
| Withdrawal of deposited securities | | US$U.S.$5.00 for each 100 ADSs (or portion thereof)
|
Direct and indirect payments by the depositary The depositary reimburses us for certain expenses we incur in connection with the ADR program, subject to a ceiling agreed between us and the depositary from time to time. These reimbursable expenses currently include legal and accounting fees, listing fees, investor relations expenses and fees payable to service providers for the distribution of material to ADR holders. For the year ended December 31, 2012,2015, such reimbursements totaled US$0.7U.S.$0.9 million. Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies None. Item 14. Material Modification to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds None.
Table of contents
PART II Item 15. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures We have carried out an evaluation, under the supervision of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and PrincipalChief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in RuleRules 13a-15(e) ofand 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.Act. Based on thatthis evaluation, ourthe Company's Chief Executive Officer and our PrincipalChief Financial Officer have concluded that as of December 31, 2015 the design and operation of ourCompany did not maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file and submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the timeperiods specified in SEC rules and forms, and (ii) collected and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure asbecause of the endmaterial weakness identified in connection with significant unusual transactions. Notwithstanding this material weakness, the Company has concluded that its consolidated financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, its financial position, results of our most recent fiscal year.
operations, capital position, and cash flows for the years presented, in conformity with the International Financial and Reporting Standards – IFRS, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board – IASB. Table Of Contents
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING Our management
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effectiveadequate internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of ourthe Company’s CEO and CFO, Audit Committee principal executive and principal financial officers, and effected by our board of directors management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with IFRS.
Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)(i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (2)the assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,IFRS and that our receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors;directors of the Company; and (3)(iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of ourthe Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect material misstatements on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Management assessed the effectiveness of ourthe Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012 based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in “Internal Control –- Integrated Framework”Framework,” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations – COSO –(COSO) of the Treadway Commission.Commission (2013). Based on thethis assessment management haswe concluded that as of December 31, 2012, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2015. As of December 31, 2015, we did not maintain effective controls to capture and accounting significant unusual transactions, which resulted in a material weakness. A material weakness is effective.a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement in our annual financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. As of December 31, 2015, we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to the design and operating effectiveness of our controls over complex and unusual transactions. Specifically, we determined that: ·Our processes and controls were not adequately designed to identify, capture and communicate information related to all complex and significant unusual transactions in a timely manner to appropriate members of our finance and accounting organization that possess the necessary skills, knowledge and authority to evaluate whether such transactions are properly accounted for in accordance with IFRS. ·Inconsistent monitoring regarding the degree and extent of procedures that should be performed by key accounting personnel in their review of accouting for all complex and significant unusual transactions to determine that the objective of the review has been achieved. This material weakness resulted in audit adjustments to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 related to the classification of certain of our trade accounts payable balances as borrowings and financings (including the restatement of prior year financial statements), revenue recognition related to certain new export sales in 2015, foreign income tax expense related to a foreign subsidiary, and the classification of the effects of non-routine transactions in the statement of cash flows. Additionally, if not remediated, this material weakness could result in a material misstatement in our consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Nevertheless the material weakness identified did not impact our major significant unusual transaction in 2015, which was the business combination of iron ore and related logistics businesses. Management is working on plans to remediate the material weakness, such as procedures and internal controls to improve our internal information and communication based on a validation guide to guarantee (i) definition of significant unusual transactions; (ii) all key departments involved; (iii) evaluation of accounting impacts and (iv) review of accounting records for these transactions. The Company is also establishing a formal policy to define all the procedures and responsible in this process.
Table of contents Attestation Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm For the report of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes, our independent registered public accounting firm, dated April 23, 2013,May 11, 2016 on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012,2015, see “Item 18. Financial Statements”. Changes in internal control over financial reporting There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Item 16. [Reserved] 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert After reviewing the qualifications of the members of our Audit Committee, our Board of Directors has determined that all three members of our Audit Committee qualify as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined by the SEC. In addition, all of the members of our Audit Committee meet the applicable independence requirements both under Brazilian Corporate Law and under the NYSE rules. Our Audit Committee is permanently assisted by a consultant, who renders financial and consulting services, among others, to the members of our Audit Committee.
Table Of Contentsof contents We have adopted
Adopted a Code of Ethics in 1998, reinforcing our ethical standards and values that apply to all of our employees, including executive officers and directors. Given its importance, theThe Code of Ethics was updated during year 20112015 and in February 2016 copies of the Code of Ethics were distributed to each employee of the organization, to our Board of Directors and our Audit Committee members, who have signed a Commitment Letter, which reinforces the dedication to the established values.
There was no amendment to or waiver from any provision of our Code of Ethics in 2012.2015. Our Code of Ethics is in compliance with the SEC requirements for codes of ethics for senior financial officers. A copy of our Code of Ethics is available on our websiteswebsite www.csn.com.br or www.csn.com.br/ir.. 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services Our interaction with our independent auditors with respect to the contracting of services unrelated to the external audit is based on principles that preserve the independence of the auditors and are otherwise permissible under applicable rules and regulations. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012,2015 and 2014, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes acted as our independent auditor, while for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, our independent auditor was KPMG Auditores Independentes.auditor. The following table describes the services rendered and the related fees. | | Year Ended December 31, | | | 2015 | | 2014 | | | (in thousands of R$) | Audit fees | | 5,063 | | 3,527 | Audit – related fees | | 871 | | 3,882 | Tax fees | | 115 | | - | Total | | 6,049 | | 7,409 |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | | 2012 | | 2011 | | | (In thousands of R$) | Audit fees | | 2,992 | | 2,654 | Audit – related fees | | 1,899 | | 285 | Tax fees | | 0 | | 142 | Total | | 4,891 | | 3,081 |
Audit fees Audit fees in 20122015 and 20112014 consisted of the aggregate fees billed and billable by our independent auditors in connection with the audit of our consolidated financial statements, reviews of interim financial statements and attestation services that are provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. Audit-related fees Audit-related fees in the above table are fees billed and billable by our independent auditors for services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements. In 2012 and 20112015 these fees refer mainly to comfort letters for offeringvaluation reports issued to attend the merger and a review of bonds andtax bookkeeping (ECF). In 2014 these fees refer mainly to due diligence processes.process Services additional to the examination of the financial statements are submitted for prior approval to the Audit Committee in order to ensure that they do not represent a conflict of interest or affect the auditors’ independence. Tax Fees Fees billed in 2011in 2015 for professional services rendered by our independent auditors are for tax compliance services. In 20122014 there arewere no fees for tax services provided by our independent auditors. Pre-approval Policies and Procedures
Our Board of Directors and Audit Committee must approve before we engage independent auditors to provide any audit or permitted non-audit services to us or our subsidiaries.
16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees We are in full compliance with the listing standards for audit committee pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 10A- 3. For a discussion on our audit committee, see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Board Practices—Fiscal Committee and Audit Committee.”
Table Of Contentsof contents 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers SinceThroughout the beginningyear of 2004,2014 and 2015 in accordance with the limits and provisions of CVM Instruction No. 10/80, our Board of Directors approved a number ofvarious share buyback programs.programs with the purpose of hold in treasury for subsequent disposal or cancellation:
Program | Board´s Authorization | Authorized Quantity | Program Period | Number Bought back | Shares Cancellation | Balance in Treasury | 1st | 03/13/2014 | 70,205,661 | 03/14/2014 04/14/2014 | 2,350,000 | | 2,350,000 | 2nd | 04/15/2014 | 67,855,661 | 04/16/2014 05/23/2014 | 9,529,500 | | 11,879,500 | 3rd | 05/23/2014 | 58,326,161 | 05/26/2014 06/25/2014 | 31,544,500 | | 43,424,000 | 4th | 06/26/2014 | 26,781,661 | 06/26/2014 07/17/2014 | 26,781,661 | | 70,205,661 | | 07/18/2014 | | | | 60,000,000 | 10,205,661 | 5th | 07/18/2014 | 64,205,661 | 07/18/2014 08/18/2014 | 240,400 | | 10,446,061 | | 08/19/2014 | | | | 10,446,061 | | 6th | 08/19/2014 | 63,161,055 | 08/19/2014 09/25/2014 | 6,791,300 | | 6,791,300 | 7th | 09/29/2014 | 56,369,755 | 09/29/2014 12/29/2014 | 21,758,600 | | 28,549,900 | 8th | 12/30/2014 | 34,611,155 | 12/31/2014 03/31/2015 | 1,841,100 | | 30,391,000 | 9th | 03/31/2015 | 32,770,055 | 04/01/2015 06/30/2015 | 0 | | 30,391,000 |
In 2012, we did not carry out any form of share buyback, either through publicly announced plans or programs or otherwise.
16F. Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant Not ApplicableApplicable. 16G. Corporate Governance Significant Differences between our Corporate Governance Practice and NYSE Corporate Governance Standards We are subject to the NYSE corporate governance listing standards. As a foreign private issuer, the standards applicable to us are considerably different than the standards applied to U.S. listed companies. Under the NYSE rules, we are required only to: (i) have an audit committee or audit board, pursuant to an applicable exemption available to foreign private issuers, that meets certain requirements, as discussed below, (ii) provide prompt certification by our Chief Executive Officer of any material non-compliance with any corporate governance rules, and (iii) provide a brief description of the significant differences between our corporate governance practices and the NYSE corporate governance practice required to be followed by U.S. listed companies. The discussion of the significant differences between our corporate governance practices and those required of U.S. listed companies follows below.
Table Of Contents
Majority of Independent Directors The NYSE rules require that a majority of the board of directors must consist of independent directors. Independence is defined by various criteria, including the absence of a material relationship between the director and the listed company. Brazilian law does not have a similar requirement. Under Brazilian law, neither our board of directors nor our management is required to test the independence of directors before their election to the board. However, both Brazilian Corporate Law and the CVM have established rules that require directors to meet certain qualification requirements and that address the compensation and duties and responsibilities of, as well as the restrictions applicable to, a company’s executive officers and directors. While our directors meet the qualification requirements of Brazilian Corporate Law and the CVM, we do not believe that a majority of our directors would be considered independent under the NYSE test for director independence. Brazilian Corporate Law requires that our directors be elected by our shareholders at an annual shareholders’ meeting.
Table of contents Executive Sessions NYSE rules require that the non-management directors must meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management present. Brazilian Corporate Law does not have a similar provision. According to Brazilian Corporate Law, up to one-third of the members of the board of directors can be elected from management. Mr. Benjamin Steinbruch, our Chief Executive Officer, is also the Chairman of our Board of Directors. There is no requirement that non-management directors meet regularly without management. As a result, the non-management directors on our Board of Directors do not typically meet in executive sessions without management present. Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee NYSE rules require that listed companies have a nominating and corporate governance committee composed entirely of independent directors and governed by a written charter addressing the committee’s required purpose and detailing its required responsibilities, which include, among other things, identifying and selecting qualified board member nominees and developing a set of corporate governance principles applicable to the company. We are not required under Brazilian Corporate Law to have, and currently we do not have, a nominating and a corporate governance committee. Compensation Committee NYSE rules require that listed companies have a compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors and governed by a written charter addressing the committee’s required purpose and detailing its required responsibilities, which include, among other things, reviewing corporate goals relevant to the chief executive officer’s compensation, evaluating the chief executive officer’s performance, approving the chief executive officer’s compensation levels and recommending to the board non-chief executive officer compensation, incentive-compensation and equity-based plans. We are not required under applicable Brazilian law to have, and currently do not have, a compensation committee. Under Brazilian Corporate Law, the total amount available for compensation of our directors and executive officers and for profit-sharing payments to our executive officers is established by our shareholders at the annual shareholders’ meeting. The board of directors is then responsible for determining the individual compensation and profit-sharing of each executive officer, as well as the compensation of our board and committee members. Audit Committee NYSE rules require that listed companies have an audit committee that (i) is composed of a minimum of three independent directors who are all financially literate, (ii) meets the SEC rules regarding audit committees for listed companies, (iii) has at least one member who has accounting or financial management expertise and (iv) is governed by a written charter addressing the committee’s required purpose and detailing its required responsibilities. However, as a foreign private issuer, we need only to comply with the requirement that the audit committee meet the SEC rules regarding audit committees for listed companies to the extent compatible with Brazilian corporate law. We have established an Audit Committee, which is equivalent to a U.S. audit committee, and provides assistance to our Board of Directors in matters involving our accounting, internal controls, financial reporting and compliance. Our Audit Committee recommends the appointment of our independent auditors to our Board of Directors and reviews the compensation of, and coordinates with, our independent auditors. They also report on our auditingpolicies and our annual audit plan prepared by our internal auditing team. Our Audit Committee also evaluates the effectiveness of our internal financial and legal compliance controls, and is comprised of up to three independent directors elected by our Board of Directors for a one-year term of office. The current members of our Audit Committee are Fernando Perrone, Yoshiaki Nakano and Antonio Francisco dos Santos.Bernardo Vieira Maia. All members of our Audit Committee satisfy the audit committee membership independence requirements set forth by the SEC and the NYSE. All members of our Audit Committee have been determined by our Board of Directors to qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of the rules adopted by the SEC relating to the disclosure of financial experts on audit committees in periodic filings pursuant to the Exchange Act. For further information on our Audit Committee, see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Board Practices—Fiscal Committee and Audit Committee.”
Table Of Contents
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Table of contents NYSE rules require that listed companies adopt and disclose a code of business conduct and ethics for directors, officers and employees, and promptly disclose any waivers of the code for directors or executive officers. Applicable Brazilian law does not have a similar requirement. We have adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to all our employees, including our executive officers and directors.directors, and it was updated in the beginning of 2016. We believe this code addresses the matters required to be addressed pursuant to the NYSE rules. For a further discussion of our Code of Ethics, see “Item 16B. Code of Ethics.Ethics.” Shareholder Approval of Equity Compensation Plans NYSE rules require that shareholders be given the opportunity to vote on all equity compensation plans and material revisions thereto, with limited exceptions. We currently do not have any such plan and, pursuant to our bylaws, we would require shareholder approval to adopt an equity compensation plan. Corporate Governance Guidelines NYSE rules require that listed companies adopt and disclose corporate governance guidelines. We have adopted the following corporate governance guidelines, either based on Brazilian law, our Code of Ethics or institutional handbook: · insider trading policy for securities issued by us; · disclosure of material facts; · disclosure of annual financial reports; · confidential policies and procedures; and · Sarbanes-Oxley Disclosure Committee’s duties and activities. Item 16H. Mine Safety Disclosure
Not applicable as none of our mines are located in the United States and as such are not subject to the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 or the Mine Safety and Health Administration. Item 17. Financial Statements We have responded to Item 18 in lieu of responding to this item. See “Item 18. Financial Statements.” PART III Item 18. Financial Statements The following consolidated financial statements of the Registrant,Nacional Minérios S.A. together with the reportsreport of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes and KPMG Auditores Independentes thereon, are filed as part of this annual report.
Table Of Contents
| | | | | Page | Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
| | FS-R1
| Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
| | FS-R2
| Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
| | FS-R3
| Consolidated financial statements:
| | | Balance sheets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011
| | FS- 1
| Statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010
| | FS- 3
| Statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010
| | FS- 4
| Statements of changes in shareholders’ equity for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010
| | FS-5
| Statements of comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010.
Notes to consolidated financial statements
| | FS-6
FS-7
|
Item 19. Exhibits
| | | Exhibit
| | Description
| Number
| | | 1.1+
| | Bylaws of CSN, as amended to date.
| 2.1
| | Form of Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement dated as of November 1, 1997 as amended and restated as of November 13, 1997, among Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (as successor to Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York), as successor depositary, and all holders from time to time of American Depositary Receipts issued thereunder (incorporated by reference from the Registration Statement on Form F-6 (333-7818) filed with the SEC).
| 2.2
| | Form of Amendment No. 1 to the Deposit Agreement (incorporated by reference from the Registration Statement on Form F-6EF (333-115078) filed with the SEC on April 30, 2004).
| 2.3
| | Form of Amendment No. 2 to Deposit Agreement, including the form of American Depositary Receipt (corporate by reference from the Registration Statement on Form F-6POS filed with the SEC on January 5, 2011)
| 8.1+
| | List of subsidiaries
| 10.1*
| | Share Purchase Agreement, dated October 21, 2008, among CSN, Big Jump Energy Participações S.A., Itochu Corporation, JFE Steel Corporation, Nippon Steel Corporation, Sumitomo Metal Industries, Ltd., Kobe Steel, Ltd., Nishin Steel Co., Ltd., and Posco. (incorporated by reference from Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the SEC on March 18, 2010)
| 10.2*+
| | Amendment to the Share Purchase Agreement, dated June 30, 2011. (incorporated by reference from Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed with the SEC on February 14, 2013).
| 10.3*
| | Shareholders Agreement of Nacional Minérios S.A., dated October 21, 2008, between CSN and Big Jump Energy Participações S.A. (incorporated by reference from Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the SEC on March 18, 2010)
| 10.4*+
| | Amendment to the Shareholders’ Agreement of Nacional Minérios S.A., dated June 30, 2011. (incorporated by reference from Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011, filed with the SEC on February 14, 2013).
| 10.5*
| | High Silica ROM Iron Ore Supply Contract, dated October 21, 2008, between CSN and Nacional Minérios S.A. (incorporated by reference from Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the SEC on March 18, 2010)
| 10.6*
| | Low Silica ROM Iron Ore Supply Contract, dated October 21, 2008, between CSN and Nacional Minérios S.A. (incorporated by reference from Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the SEC on March 18, 2010)
| 10.7*
| | Iron Ore Supply Contract, dated October 21, 2008, between CSN and Nacional Minérios S.A. (incorporated by reference from Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the SEC on March 18, 2010)
| 10.8*
| | Port Operating Services Agreement, dated October 21, 2008, between CSN and Nacional Minérios S.A. (incorporated by reference from Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed with the SEC on March 18, 2010)
| 12.1+
| | Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
| 12.2+
| | Section 302 Certification of Principal Financial Officer.
| 13.1+
| | Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
| 13.2+
| | Section 906 Certification of Principal Financial Officer.
| 15.1+
| | Management’s report dated April 23, 2013, on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012.
| * Portions of this exhibit have been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of an application for confidential treatment pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
+ Filed herewith.
| |
Table Of Contents
SIGNATURE
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.
| | | April 30, 2012
| Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional
| | By:
| | | | /s/
| Benjamin Steinbruch
| | | Title:
| Chief Executive Officer
| | | By:
| | | | /s/
| Rogério Leme Borges dos Santos
| | | Title:
| Controller / Principal Financial Officer
| | | | |
138
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Companhia Siderurgica Nacional
São Paulo – SP, Brazil
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Companhia Siderurgica Nacional and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2012, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission - COSO. As described in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management excluded from its assessment the internal control over financial reporting at Stahlwerk Thüringen GmbH, which was acquired on January 31, 2012 and whose financial statements constitute 3.5% of total assets, and 6.6% of net revenues from sales and/or services, of the consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012. Accordingly, our audit did not include the internal control over financial reporting at Stahlwerk Thüringen GmbH. The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board - IASB. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board - IASB, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
FS-R1
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012 of the Company and our report dated April 23, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes
DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU AUDITORES INDEPENDENTES
São Paulo – SP, Brazil
April 23, 2013
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Companhia Siderurgica Nacional
São Paulo – SP, Brazil
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Companhia Siderurgica Nacional and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2012. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) - PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Companhia Siderurgica Nacional and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2012, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board - IASB.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) - PCAOB, the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission - COSO and our report dated April 23, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes
DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU AUDITORES INDEPENDENTES
São Paulo – SP, Brasil
April 23, 2013
FS-R2
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | The Board
| FS-R1 | Consolidated financial statements: | | | Balance sheets as of DirectorsNovember 30, 2015 and ShareholdersDecember 31, 2014 | Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional:
| FS- 1 |
| Statements of income for the eleven month-period ended November 30, 2015 and for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 | | FS- 3 |
| Statements of comprehensive income for the eleven month-period ended November 30, 2015 and for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 | | FS- 4 |
| Statements of cash flow for the eleven month-period ended November 30, 2015 and for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 | | FS- 5 |
| Statements of changes in shareholders’ equity for the eleven month-period ended November 30, 2015 and for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 | | FS- 6 |
| Notes to consolidated financial statement | | FS- 7 |
| | | |
Table of contents Exhibit | Description | Number | | 1.1+ | We have auditedBylaws of CSN . (incorporated by reference from Annual Report on Form 20-F for the accompanying consolidated balance sheetyear ended December 31, 2014, filed with the SEC on April 30, 2015).
| |
2.1 | Form of Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement dated as of November 1, 1997 as amended and restated as of November 13, 1997, among Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (as successor to Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York), as successor depositary, and subsidiaries (the “Company”)all holders from time to time of American Depositary Receipts issued thereunder (incorporated by reference from the Registration Statement on Form F-6 (333-7818) filed with the SEC). | 2.2 | Form of Amendment No. 1 to the Deposit Agreement (incorporated by reference from the Registration Statement on Form F-6EF (333-115078) filed with the SEC on April 30, 2004). | 2.3 | Form of Amendment No. 2 to Deposit Agreement, including the form of American Depositary Receipt (incorporate by reference from the Registration Statement on Form F-6POS filed with the SEC on January 5, 2011) | | | 4.1+ | Investment Agreement, dated November21, 2014, among Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional, Brazil Japan Iron Ore Corporation, POSCO, China Steel Corporation, Congonhas Minérios S.A. and Nacional Minérios S.A. (incorporated by reference from Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed with the SEC on April 30, 2015). | 8.1+ | List of Subsidiaries | 12.1+ | Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer. | |
12.2+ | Section 302 Certification of Principal Financial Officer. | |
13.1+ | Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer. | |
13.2+ | Section 906 Certification of Principal Financial Officer. | |
15.1+ | Management’s report datedMay 11, 2016, on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, and2015. | |
| | 15.2 | Consent of Snowden do Brasil Consultoria Ltda (incorporated by reference to the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flowsAnnual Report on Form 20-F for each of the years in the two-year periodyear ended December 31, 2011. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance2014, filed with the standardsSEC on April 30, 2015)
|
* Portions of this exhibit have been omitted and filed separately with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we planSecurities and performExchange Commission as part of an application for confidential treatment pursuant to the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are freeSecurities Exchange Act of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management,1934, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.amended. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
+ Filed herewith. |
Table of contents
SIGNATURE The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf. | | | May 13, 2016 | Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2011, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). | | | | | | | | By: | /s/ KPMG Auditores IndependentesBenjamin Steinbruch São Paulo, Brazil
April 27, 2012Benjamin Steinbruch
| | FS-R3
| Title: | Chief Executive Officer | | | | | | By: | /s/ Paulo Rogério Caffarelli Paulo Rogério Caffarelli | | | Title: | Principal Financial Officer | | | | |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Companhia Siderurgica Nacional São Paulo – SP, Brazil We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2015, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards – IFRS, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board - IASB. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards – IFRS, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board - IASB, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weakness has been identified and included in management’s assessment: The Company did not maintain effective internal controls over complex and unusual transactions. This material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, of the Company and this report does not affect our report on such consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weakness described above on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. We do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on management’s statements regarding its disclosures about corrective actions planned by the Company after the date of management's assessment. We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, of the Company and our report dated May 11, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and included an explanatory paragraph related to the restatement of the consolidated balance sheets and statements of cash flows as of and for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. /s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes São Paulo, Brazil May 11, 2016
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Companhia Siderurgica Nacional São Paulo – SP, Brazil We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Companhia Siderurgica Nacional and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) - PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Companhia Siderurgica Nacional and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards – IFRS, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board - IASB. As discussed in Note 2.a.a) to the consolidated financial statements, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 and the related statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 have been restated to reflect the reclassification of certain trade payables balances as borrowings and financings. We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) - PCAOB, the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission - COSO and our report dated May 11, 2016 expressed an adverse opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting because of a material weakness. /s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU AUDITORES INDEPENDENTES São Paulo – SP, Brazil May 11, 2016
Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional and Subsidiaries | Consolidated Balance Sheet | Thousands of Brazilian reais | | | | | | | | | | Assets | | | | | | Note | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | CURRENT ASSETS | | | | | Cash and cash equivalents | 4 | 7,861,052 | 8,686,021 | 9,995,672 | Financial Investments | 5 | 763,599 | | | Trade receivables | 6 | 1,578,277 | 1,753,056 | 2,522,465 | Inventories | 7 | 4,941,314 | 4,122,122 | 3,160,985 | Other current assets | 8 | 1,286,449 | 1,374,303 | 722,920 | Total current assets | | 16,430,691 | 15,935,502 | 16,402,042 | | | | | | NON-CURRENT ASSETS | | | | | Investments measured at fair value | | | 34,874 | 30,756 | Deferred income taxes | 15b | 3,307,027 | 2,616,058 | 2,770,527 | Other non-current assets | 8 | 1,583,921 | 947,420 | 1,835,325 | | | 4,890,948 | 3,598,352 | 4,636,608 | | | | | | Investments | 9 | 3,998,227 | 13,665,453 | 13,487,023 | Property, plant and equipment | 10 | 17,871,599 | 15,624,140 | 14,911,426 | Intangible assets | 11 | 5,458,509 | 943,653 | 965,440 | Total non-current assets | | 32,219,283 | 33,831,598 | 34,000,497 | | | | | | TOTAL ASSETS | | 48,649,974 | 49,767,100 | 50,402,539 | | | | | | | | | | | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. |
F-1
Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional and Subsidiaries | Consolidated Balance Sheet | Thousands of Brazilian reais | | | | | | | | | | | | Liabilities and shareholders´ equity | | | | | | | | | | Restated | Restated | | Note | 2015 | | 2014 | 2013 | LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | | | | | | CURRENT LIABILITIES | | | | | | Payroll and related taxes | | 256,840 | | 219,740 | 208,921 | Trade payables | | 1,293,008 | | 1,167,826 | 1,059,772 | Taxes payable | | 700,763 | | 318,675 | 304,095 | Borrowings and financing | 12 | 1,874,681 | | 3,261,203 | 2,642,807 | Other payables | 14 | 1,073,017 | | 845,109 | 972,851 | Provisions for tax, social security, labor and civil risks | 17 | 127,262 | | 550,385 | 333,519 | Total current liabilities | | 5,325,571 | | 6,362,938 | 5,521,965 | | | | | | | NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES | | | | | | Borrowings and financing | 12 | 32,407,834 | | 27,092,855 | 25,145,888 | Other payables | 14 | 131,284 | | 9,315,363 | 10,061,571 | Deferred income taxes | 15b | 494,851 | | 238,892 | 268,833 | Provisions for tax, social security, labor and civil risks | 17 | 711,472 | | 195,783 | 479,664 | Pension and healthcare plan | 27c | 514,368 | | 587,755 | 485,105 | Provision for environmental liabilities and decommissioning of assets | 18 | 328,931 | | 238,539 | 370,454 | Total non-current liabilities | | 34,588,740 | | 37,669,187 | 36,811,515 | | | | | | | Shareholders Equity | 20 | | | | | Issued capital | | 4,540,000 | | 4,540,000 | 4,540,000 | Capital reserves | | 30 | | 30 | 30 | Earnings reserves | | 2,104,804 | | 1,131,298 | 2,839,568 | Other comprehensive income | | 1,019,913 | | 25,140 | 716,972 | Total equity attributable to owners of the Company | | 7,664,747 | | 5,696,468 | 8,096,570 | | | | | | | Non-controlling interests | | 1,070,916 | | 38,507 | (27,511) | | | | | | | Total equity | | 8,735,663 | | 5,734,975 | 8,069,059 | | | | | | | TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | | 48,649,974 | | 49,767,100 | 50,402,539 | | | | | | | | | | | | | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. |
F-2
Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional and Subsidiaries | Consolidated Statements of Income | Thousands of Brazilian reais | | | | | | | | | | | | Note | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | Net Revenue from sales and/or services | 22 | 15,331,852 | 16,126,232 | 17,312,432 | Cost of sales and/or services | 23 | (11,799,758) | (11,592,382) | (12,422,706) | | | | | | Gross profit | | 3,532,094 | 4,533,850 | 4,889,726 | | | | | | Operating expenses | | 1,645,531 | (1,715,837) | (1,769,972) | Selling expenses | 23 | (1,436,000) | (1,041,975) | (874,875) | General and administrative expenses | 23 | (470,368) | (438,383) | (485,090) | Other operating income | 24 | 3,725,882 | 90,488 | 566,063 | Other operating expenses | 24 | (1,334,331) | (657,127) | (1,134,208) | Equity in results of affiliated companies | | 1,160,348 | 331,160 | 158,138 | | | | | | Profit before finance income (costs) and taxes | | 5,177,625 | 2,818,013 | 3,119,754 | Financial income | 25 | 491,987 | 171,552 | 171,984 | Financial costs | 25 | (3,865,037) | (3,252,985) | (2,683,583) | | | | | | Profit (Loss) before income taxes | | 1,804,575 | (263,420) | 608,155 | | | | | | Income tax and social contribution | 15a | (188,624) | 151,153 | (74,161) | | | | | | Net income (loss) for the year | | 1,615,951 | (112,267) | 533,994 | | | | | | Profit (Loss) for the year attributed to: | | | | | Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional | | 1,257,896 | (105,218) | 509,025 | Non-controlling interests | | 358,055 | (7,049) | 24,969 | | | | | | Earnings per common share - (reais/share) | | | | | Basic | 20g | 0.92687 | (0.07443) | 0.34913 | Diluted | 20g | 0.92687 | (0.07443) | 0.34913 | | | | | |
F-3
Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional and Subsidiaries | Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income | Thousands of Brazilian reais | | | | | | | Note | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | Consolidated profit for the year | | 1,615,951 | (112,267) | 533,994 | Other comprehensive income | | (949,903) | (691,832) | 330,648 | Items that will not be subsequently reclassified to the statement of income | | | | | Actuarial gains on defined benefit plan from investments in subsidiaries | | 230 | 2,221 | | Actuarial (losses) gains on defined benefit pension plan | | 92,221 | (95,175) | 97,478 | Income tax and social contribution on actuarial (losses) gains on defined benefit pension plan | | 372 | 32,360 | (33,142) | | | 92,823 | (60,594) | 64,336 | Items that could be subsequently reclassified to the statement of income | | | | | Cumulative translation adjustments for the year | | 530,540 | 28,227 | 218,927 | Change in fair value of available-for-sale assets financial assets | | (969,701) | (971,808) | 66,793 | Income tax and social contribution on available-for-sale financial assets | | 174,166 | 330,415 | (22,709) | Impairment of available-for-sale assets | 13 | 555,298 | 205,000 | 5,002 | Income tax and social contribution on impairment of available-for-sale assets | 13 | (33,269) | (69,700) | (1,701) | (Loss) gain on percentage change in investments | | 1,980 | (73,754) | | (Loss) gain on cash flow hedge accounting | 13 | (1,399,457) | (120,633) | | Income tax and social contribution on (loss) gain on cash flow hedge accounting | 13 | 117,865 | 41,015 | | (Loss) gain on hedge of net investments in foreign subsidiaries | 13.b | (20,148) | | | | | (1,042,726) | (631,238) | 266,312 | | | | | | Comprehensive income for the year | | 666,048 | (804,099) | 864,642 | Attributable to: | | | | | | Attributed to owners of the Company | | | 307,993 | (797,050) | 839,673 | Attributed to non-controlling interests | | | 358,055 | (7,049) | 24,969 | | | | | | |
Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional and Subsidiaries | Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow | Thousands of Brazilian reais | | | | |
|
| Restated | Restated | | Note | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | | | | | | Profit (Loss) for the year | | 1,615,951 | (112,267) | 533,994 | Accrued charges on borrowings and financing | | 2,889,163 | 2,782,681 | 2,233,500 | Charges on loans and financing granted | | (65,084) | (41,373) | (54,217) | Depreciation/ depletion / amortization | 10.a | 1,176,840 | 1,281,485 | 1,155,593 | Equity in results of affiliated companies | 26 | (1,160,348) | (331,160) | (158,138) | Deferred income tax and social contribution | | (192,207) | (679,323) | (1,216,594) | Provision for tax, social security, labor and civil risks | | 85,965 | 5,302 | 97,371 | Monetary variations and exchange differences | | 3,389,448 | 1,185,761 | 1,638,653 | Provision of swaps/forwards transactions | | 4,086 | 4,869 | 21,643 | Impairment of available-for-sale assets | 13 | 555,298 | 205,000 | 5,002 | Proceeds from disposal of assets | 24 | 6,466 | 15,232 | 31,660 | Gain on repurchase of debt securities | | (166,642) | | | Provision for actuarial liabilities | | 1,193 | 7,350 | 13,488 | Gain on business combination | | (3,413,033) | | | Impairment loss adjustment | | | | 48,469 | Gain on loss of control over Transnordestina | | | | (473,899) | Impairment of the Transnordestina old railway network | | | | 216,446 | Other provisions | | 101,854 | 44,825 | 7,985 | Cash generated from operations | | 4,828,950 | 4,368,382 | 4,100,956 | | | | | | Trade receivables - third parties | | 208,488 | 88,736 | (225,028) | Trade receivables - related parties | | 217,439 | (143,218) | (62,795) | Inventories | | (726,800) | (917,193) | 259,301 | Receivables from related parties | | 3,545,142 | 263,569 | (54,931) | Recoverable taxes | | (537,669) | (27,944) | 486,787 | Judicial deposits | | (35,415) | 203,065 | 5,821 | Dividends received from related parties | | | | 324,180 | Trade payables | | 301,118 | 219,353 | (303,063) | Payroll and related taxes | | 188,734 | 9,777 | 148,556 | Taxes in installments - REFIS | | 66,635 | (567,000) | 446,443 | Payables to related parties | | (69,412) | 2,080 | (3,063) | Interest paid | | (2,964,826) | (2,744,954) | (2,389,654) | Interest received | | 8,402 | 13,609 | 24,321 | Interest on swaps paid | | | (1,279) | (4,617) | Other | | 38,377 | 56,726 | (30,158) | Increase (Decrease) in assets and liabilities | | 240,213 | (3,544,673) | (1,377,900) | Net cash generated by operating activities | | 5,069,163 | 823,709 | 2,723,056 | | | | | | Investments | | (2,727,036) | (8,376) | (5,131) | Purchase of property, plant and equipment | 10 | (1,616,173) | (1,848,496) | (2,489,569) | Capital reduction on joint venture | | 466,758 | | | Receipt in derivative transactions | | 903,153 | 76,607 | 426,328 | Purchase of intangible assets | 11 | (1,462) | (727) | (635) | Cash and cash equivalents in Namisa consolidation | | 456,364 | | | Cash and cash equivalents on the loss of control over Transnordestina | | | | (146,475) | Receipt loans from related-party | | 443,345 | 127,366 | | Loans granted to related parties | | (61,217) | | | Short-term investment, net of redeemed amount | | (728,725) | (4,117) | (30,324) | Net cash used in investing activities | | (2,864,993) | (1,657,743) | (2,245,806) | Borrowings and financing raised | 12 | 373,491 | 1,898,606 | 1,697,363 | Payment of borrowings | | (2,380,968) | (1,241,461) | (1,923,703) | Payment of borrowings - related parties | | (52,839) | (46,585) | | Dividends paid | | (549,835) | (424,939) | (1,660,503) | Treasury shares | | (9,390) | (909,204) | 5,424 | Forfaiting funding / drawee risk | | 924,706 | 641,430 | 62,592 | Forfaiting amortization / drawee risk | | (1,146,306) | (276,754) | (587,569) | Buyback of debt securities | | (249,627) | (172,432) | | Net cash used in financing activities | | (3,090,768) | (531,339) | (2,406,396) | | | | | | Exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | | 61,629 | 55,722 | 32,997 | | | | | | Decrease in cash and cash equivalents | | (824,969) | (1,309,651) | (1,929,146) | Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year | | 8,686,021 | 9,995,672 | 11,891,821 | Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year | | 7,861,052 | 8,686,021 | 9,995,672 | | | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. | |
F-5
Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional and Subsidiaries | | | | | Consolidated Balance Sheet | | | | | | Thousands of Brazilian reais | | | | | | | | | | | | Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | Note | | 2012 | | 2011 | CURRENT ASSETS | | | | | | Cash and cash equivalents | 4 | | 14,444,875 | | 15,417,393 | Trade receivables | 5 | | 1,794,566 | | 1,616,206 | Inventories | 6 | | 3,580,025 | | 3,734,984 | Other current assets | 7 | | 1,302,479 | | 1,175,723 | Total current assets | | | 21,121,945 | | 21,944,306 | | | | | | | NON-CURRENT ASSETS | | | | | | Long-term receivables | | | | | | Short-term investments | | | 116,753 | | 139,679 | Deferred income taxes | 8 | | 2,372,501 | | 1,840,773 | Other non-current assets | 7 | | 1,648,056 | | 2,876,269 | | | | 4,137,310 | | 4,856,721 | | | | | | | Investments | 9 | | 2,351,774 | | 2,088,225 | Property, plant and equipment | 10 | | 20,408,747 | | 17,377,076 | Intangible assets | 11 | | 1,275,452 | | 603,374 | Total non-current assets | | | 28,173,283 | | 24,925,396 | | | | | | | TOTAL ASSETS | | | 49,295,228 | | 46,869,702 | | | | | | | | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. |
FS-1
Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional and Subsidiaries | | | | | | Consolidated Balance Sheet | | | | | | Thousands of Brazilian reais | | | | | | | | | | | | Liabilities and shareholders´ equity | | | | | | | | | | | | | Note | | 2012 | | 2011 | SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY AND LIABILITIES | | | | | | CURRENT LIABILITIES | | | | | | Payroll and related taxes | | | 241,291 | | 202,469 | Trade payables | | | 1,957,789 | | 1,232,075 | Taxes payable | | | 336,348 | | 325,132 | Borrowings and financing | 12 | | 2,295,409 | | 2,702,083 | Other payables | 14 | | 1,221,350 | | 1,728,445 | Provisions for tax, social security, labor and civil risks | 16 | | 355,889 | | 292,178 | Other provisions | | | | | 14,565 | Total current liabilities | | | 6,408,076 | | 6,496,947 | | | | | | | NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES | | | | | | Borrowings and financing | 12 | | 27,856,350 | | 25,186,505 | Other payables | 14 | | 4,388,451 | | 5,593,520 | Deferred income taxes | 8 | | 284,110 | | 37,851 | Provisions for tax, social security, labor and civil risks | 16 | | 371,697 | | 346,285 | Employee Benefits | 28 | | 565,591 | | 469,050 | Other provisions | | | 413,440 | | 322,374 | Total non-current liabilities | | | 33,879,639 | | 31,955,585 | | | | | | | Equity | 19 | | | | | Issued capital | | | 4,540,000 | | 1,680,947 | Capital reserves | | | 30 | | 30 | Earnings reserves | | | 3,690,543 | | 7,671,620 | Other comprehensive income/(loss) | | | 386,324 | | -1,366,776 | Total equity attributable to owners of the Company | | | 8,616,897 | | 7,985,821 | | | | | | | Non-controlling interests | | | 390,616 | | 431,349 | | | | | | | Total equity | | | 9,007,513 | | 8,417,170 | | | | | | | TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES | | | 49,295,228 | | 46,869,702 | | | | | | | | | | | | | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. |
FS-2
Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional and Subsidiaries | | | | | | | Consolidated Statements of Income | | | | | | | | Thousands of Brazilian reais | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Note | | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | Net Revenue from sales and/or services | 22 | | 16,896,264 | | 16,519,584 | | 14,450,510 | Cost of sales and/or services | 23 | | -12,072,206 | | -9,800,844 | | -7,882,726 | | | | | | | | | Gross profit | | | 4,824,058 | | 6,718,740 | | 6,567,784 | | | | | | | | | Operating expenses | | | -4,182,361 | | -961,818 | | -1,569,438 | Selling expenses | 23 | | -931,525 | | -604,108 | | -481,978 | General and administrative expenses | 23 | | -576,514 | | -575,585 | | -536,857 | Other operating income | 24 | | 46,003 | | 719,177 | | 48,821 | Other operating expenses | 24 | | -2,719,373 | | -501,302 | | -599,424 | Share of profits of investees | | | -952 | | | | | | | | | | | | | Profit before finance income (costs) and taxes | | 641,697 | | 5,756,922 | | 4,998,346 | Finance income | 25 | | 416,781 | | 717,450 | | 643,140 | Finance costs | 25 | | -2,409,186 | | -2,723,253 | | -2,554,598 | | | | | | | | | (Loss) profit before income taxes | | | -1,350,708 | | 3,751,119 | | 3,086,888 | | | | | | | | | Income tax and social contribution | 26 | | 870,134 | | -83,885 | | -570,697 | | | | | | | | | (Loss) profit from continuing operations | | | -480,574 | | 3,667,234 | | 2,516,191 | | | | | | | | | (Loss) profit for the year attributed to: | | | | | | | | Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional | | | -420,113 | | 3,706,033 | | 2,516,376 | Non-controlling interests | | | -60,461 | | -38,799 | | -185 | | | | | | | | | (Losses) Earnings per common share - (reais/share) | | | | | | | | Basic | 27 | | -0.28815 | | 2.54191 | | 1.72594 | Diluted | 27 | | -0.28815 | | 2.54191 | | 1.72594 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. | | |
FS-3
Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional and Subsidiaries | | | | | | Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income | | | | | | Thousands of Brazilian reais | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | (Loss) profitfor the year | -480,574 | | 3,667,234 | | 2,516,191 | | | | | | | Other comprehensive income | 1,753,100 | | -1,198,761 | | 417,700 | Exchange differences arising on translation of foreign operations, net of taxes ((R$425,510) in 2012 and (R$425,510) in 2011) | 147,735 | | 195,046 | | -69,270 | Actuarial gains/(losses) on defined benefit plan, net of taxes (R$66,155 in 2012 and R$54,714 in 2011) | 106,209 | | -74,331 | | -28,603 | Net change in fair value of available-for-sale financial assets, net of taxes ((R$377,164) in 2012 and R$241,484 in 2011) | -8,329 | | -621,312 | | 515,573 | Net change in fair value of available-for-sale financial assets transferred to profit or loss | | | -698,164 | | | Impairment of available-for-sale assets, net of taxes | 1,507,485 | | | | | | | | | | | Comprehensive income for the year | 1,272,526 | | 2,468,473 | | 2,933,891 | | | | | | | Attributable to: | | | | | | Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional | 1,332,987 | | 2,507,272 | | 2,934,076 | Non-controlling interests | -60,461 | | -38,799 | | -185 | | | | | | | | | | | | | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. |
FS-4
| | | | | | | | Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional and Subsidiaries | | | | | Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow | | | | | | | | Thousands of Brazilian reais | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Note | | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | | | | | | | | | Profit for the year | | | -480,574 | | 3,667,234 | | 2,516,191 | Accrued charges on borrowings and financing | | | 2,249,123 | | 2,650,622 | | 1,489,191 | Depreciation/ depletion / amortization | 10.b) | | 1,230,651 | | 948,251 | | 814,034 | Proceeds from write-off and disposal of assets | | | 5,246 | | 54,727 | | 5,827 | Impairment of available-for-sale assets | 24 | | 2,022,793 | | | | | Realization of available-for-sale investments | 24 | | | | -698,164 | | | Deferred income tax and social contribution | 8 | | -1,075,156 | | -52,542 | | 207,268 | Provision of swaps/forwards transactions | | | 4,975 | | 110,009 | | 126,492 | Share of profits of investees | | | 952 | | | | | Provision for actuarial liabilities | | | -30,655 | | -11,412 | | 2,393 | Provision for tax, social security, labor and civil risks | | | 252,432 | | 62,746 | | 199,558 | Inflation adjustment and exchange differences | | | 996,810 | | -250,083 | | 57,119 | Allowance for doubtful debts | | | | | 189 | | -46,675 | Other provisions | | | 70,252 | | -19,651 | | -80,570 | Cash generated from operations | | | 5,246,849 | | 6,461,926 | | 5,290,828 | | | | | | | | | Trade receivables | | | -237,873 | | -339,427 | | 143,250 | Inventories | | | 200,893 | | -410,264 | | -794,331 | Receivables from related parties | | | -3,774 | | 471,666 | | | Recoverable taxes | | | 139,823 | | 16,700 | | 297,424 | Trade payables | | | 663,198 | | 544,300 | | 11,964 | Payroll and related taxes | | | -91,447 | | -47,072 | | -36,757 | Taxes payable | | | 74,982 | | 135,765 | | -101,723 | Taxes in installments - REFIS | | | -255,338 | | -296,304 | | -414,473 | Judicial deposits | | | 39,023 | | -20,253 | | -33,822 | Payables to related parties | | | -1,322 | | | | | Contingent liabilities | | | -10,539 | | 120,951 | | 16,868 | Interest paid | | | -2,297,833 | | -2,145,400 | | -1,190,423 | Interest paid on swap transactions | | | -50,569 | | -360,976 | | -676,163 | Other | | | 71,427 | | 70,168 | | 4,662 | Increase (decrease) in assets and liabilities | | | -1,759,349 | | -2,260,146 | | -2,773,524 | | | | | | | | | Net cash generated by (used in) operating activities | | 3,487,500 | | 4,201,780 | | 2,517,304 | | | | | | | | | Receipt/payment in derivative transactions | | | 57,740 | | -57,157 | | 395,346 | Disposal of investments | | | | | 1,310,171 | | | Cash from acquisition of subsidiaries | | | 14,880 | | | | | Investments | | | -166,915 | | -2,126,493 | | -1,370,016 | Property, plant and equipment | 10 | | -3,142,634 | | -4,400,825 | | -3,635,911 | Intangible assets | 11 | | -1,532 | | -707 | | -25,216 |
FS-5
Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional and Subsidiaries | | | | | Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow | | | | | | | | Thousands of Brazilian reais | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Note | | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2010 | | | | | | | | | Acquisition of subsidiary | | | -301,192 | | | | | Net cash used in investing activities | | | -3,539,653 | | -5,275,011 | | -4,635,797 | | | | | | | | | Borrowings and financing | 12 | | 3,721,945 | | 7,824,012 | | 8,754,779 | Repayments to financial institutions - principal | 12 | | -2,523,828 | | -1,469,206 | | -2,706,982 | Dividends and interest on capital | | | -1,199,734 | | -1,856,381 | | -1,560,795 | Repayments of principal - acquisition of subsidiaries | | | -803,456 | | | | | Capital contribution by non-controlling shareholders | | | 56,194 | | 242,290 | | 128,811 | Net cash generated by (used in) financing activities | | | -748,879 | | 4,740,715 | | 4,615,813 | | | | | | | | | Exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | | -171,486 | | 1,510,631 | | -228,833 | | | | | | | | Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | -972,518 | | 5,178,115 | | 2,268,487 | Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year | | 15,417,393 | | 10,239,278 | | 7,970,791 | Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year | | 14,444,875 | | 15,417,393 | | 10,239,278 | | | | | | | | The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. | | |
FS-6
Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional and Subsidiaries | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders' Equity | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Thousands of Brazilian reais | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Paid-in Capital | | Capital Reserve | | Earnings Reserve | | Retained earnings | | Other comprehensive income | | Shareholders´Equity | | Non-Controling interests | | Consolidated Equity | Opening balance at January 1, 2010 | 1,680,947 | | 30 | | 5,444,605 | | (33,417) | | (585,715) | | 6,506,450 | | 83,060 | | 6,589,510 | Approval of prior year’s proposed dividends | | | | | (1,178,635) | | | | | | (1,178,635) | | | | (1,178,635) | Profit for the year | | | | | | | 2,516,376 | | | | 2,516,376 | | (185) | | 2,516,191 | Allocation of profit for the year | | | | | | | (272,297) | | | | (272,297) | | | | (272,297) | Declared dividends (R$186.76 per thousand shares) | | | | | | | (356,800) | | | | (356,800) | | | | (356,800) | Interest on capital (R$244.72 per thousand shares) | | | | | | | (1,227,703) | | | | (1,227,703) | | | | (1,227,703) | Additional dividends proposed (R$842.06 per thousand shares) | | | | | 1,227,703 | | | | | | 1,227,703 | | | | 1,227,703 | Investment reserve | | | | | 626,159 | | (626,159) | | | | | | | | | Cancelation of treasury shares | | | | | (34) | | | | | | (34) | | | | (34) | Comprehensive income | | | | | | | | | 417,700 | | 417,700 | | | | 417,700 | Non-controlling interests | | | | | | | | | | | | | 107,053 | | 107,053 | Balances at December 31, 2010 | 1,680,947 | | 30 | | 6,119,798 | | | | (168,015) | | 7,632,760 | | 189,928 | | 7,822,688 | Approval of prior year’s proposed dividends | | | | | (1,227,703) | | | | | | (1,227,703) | | | | (1,227,703) | Profit for the year | | | | | | | 3,706,033 | | | | 3,706,033 | | (38,799) | | 3,667,234 | Allocation of profit for the year | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Declared dividends (R$635.48 per thousand shared) | | | | | | | (926,508) | | | | (926,508) | | | | (926,508) | Additional dividends proposed (R$187.58 per thousand shares) | | | | | 273,492 | | (273,492) | | | | | | | | | Other comprehensive income | | | | | | | | | (1,198,761) | | (1,198,761) | | | | (1,198,761) | Recognition of reserves | | | | | 2,506,033 | | (2,506,033) | | | | | | | | | Non-controlling interests | | | | | | | | | | | | | 280,220 | | 280,220 | Balances at December 31, 2011 | 1,680,947 | | 30 | | 7,671,620 | | | | (1,366,776) | | 7,985,821 | | 431,349 | | 8,417,170 | Capital transactions with shareholders | 2,859,053 | | | | (3,432,545) | | | | | | (573,492) | | | | (573,492) | Capital increases | 2,859,053 | | | | (2,859,053) | | | | | | | | | | | Declared dividends (R$205.77 per thousand shared) | | | | | (300,000) | | | | | | (300,000) | | | | (300,000) |
FS-7
Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional and Subsidiaries | | | | | | | | | | | Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders' Equity | | | | | | | | | | | Thousands of Brazilian reais | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Paid-in Capital | | Capital Reserve | | Earnings Reserve | | Retained earnings | | Other comprehensive income | | Shareholders´Equity | | Non-Controling interests | | Consolidated Equity | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Interest on capital (R$384.10 per thousand shares) | | | | | (560,000) | | | | | | (560,000) | | | | (560,000) | Interest on capital proposed | | | | | 560,000 | | | | | | 560,000 | | | | 560,000 | Approval of prior year’s proposed dividends | | | | | (273,492) | | | | | | (273,492) | | | | (273,492) | Total comprehensive income | | | | | | | (548,532) | | 1,753,100 | | 1,204,568 | | (60,461) | | 1,144,107 | Profit for the year | | | | | | | (420,113) | | | | (420,113) | | (60,461) | | (480,574) | Other comprehensive income | | | | | | | (128,419) | | 1,753,100 | | 1,624,681 | | | | 1,624,681 | Cumulative translation adjustments for the period | | | | | | | | | 147,735 | | 147,735 | | | | 147,735 | Actuarial (losses)/gains on defined benefit pension plan | | | | | | | | | (22,210) | | (22,210) | | | | (22,210) | Available-for-sale assets, net of taxes | | | | | | | | | 1,499,156 | | 1,499,156 | | | | 1,499,156 | Acturial losses reclassification | | | | | | | (128,419) | | 128,419 | | | | | | | Losses absorption for the period | | | | | (420,113) | | (420,113) | | | | | | | | | Acturial losses absorption | | | | | (128,419) | | (128,419) | | | | | | | | | Non-controlling interests in subsidiaries | | | | | | | | | | | | | 19,728 | | 19,728 | Balances at December 31, 2012 | 4,540,000 | | 30 | | 3,690,543 | | | | 386,324 | | 8,616,897 | | 390,616 | | 9,007,513 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
FS-8
(Expressed in thousands of reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional and Subsidiaries
| Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders´ Equity | Thousands of Brazilian reais |
| Paid-in Capital | Capital Reserve | Earnings Reserve | Retained earnings | Other comprehensive income | Shareholders´Equity | Non-Controlling interests | Consolidated Equity | Balances at December 31, 2012 | 4,540,000 | 30 | 3,690,543 | | 386,324 | 8,616,897 | 390,616 | 9,007,513 | Capital transactions with shareholders | | | (560,000) | (800,000) | | (1,360,000) | | (1,360,000) | Declared dividends (R$418.39 per thousand shares) | | | | (610,000) | | (610,000) | | (610,000) | Interest on capital (R$130.32 per Thousand shares) | | | | (190,000) | | (190,000) | | (190,000) | Approval of prior year’s proposed dividends | | (560,000) | | | (560,000) | | (560,000) | Total comprehensive income | | | | 509,025 | 330,648 | 839,673 | 24,969 | 864,642 | Profit for the year | | | | 509,025 | | 509,025 | 24,969 | 533,994 | Other comprehensive income | | | | | 330,648 | 330,648 | | 330,648 | Cumulative translation adjustments of the period | | | | | 218,927 | 218,927 | | 218,927 | Actuarial (losses) on defined benefit pension plan | | | | | 64,336 | 64,336 | | 64,336 | Available-for-sale assets, net of taxes | | | | | 44,084 | 44,084 | | 44,084 | Impairment of available-for-sale assets | | | | | 3,301 | 3,301 | | 3,301 | Internal changes in shareholders' equity | | | (290,975) | 290,975 | | | | | Recognition of reserves | | | 25,451 | (25,451) | | | | | Reversal of statutory working capital reserve | | | (316,426) | 316,426 | | | | | Non-controlling interests in subsidiaries | | | | | | | (443,096) | (443,096) | Balances at December 31, 2013 | 4,540,000 | 30 | 2,839,568 | | 716,972 | 8,096,570 | -27,511 | 8,069,059 | Capital transactions with shareholders | | | (1,609,204) | | | (1,609,204) | | (1,609,204) | Treasury shares acquired | | | (909,204) | | | (909,204) | | (909,204) | Declared dividends (R$493.53 per thousand shares) | | | (700,000) | | | (700,000) | | (700,000) | Total comprehensive income | | | | (99,066) | (691,832) | (790,898) | (7,049) | (797,947) | Profit for the year | | | | (105,218) | | (105,218) | (7,049) | (112,267) | Other comprehensive income | | | | 6,152 | (691,832) | (685,680) | | (685,680) | Cumulative translation adjustments for the period | | | | | 28,227 | 28,227 | | 28,227 | Actuarial gains on defined benefit pension plan | | | | | (54,442) | (54,442) | | (54,442) | Actuarial gain recycled to retained earnings | | | | 6,152 | (6,152) | | | | Loss on available-for-sale assets, net of taxes | | | | | (506,093) | (506,093) | | (506,093) | Gain on percentage change in investments | | | | | (73,754) | (73,754) | | (73,754) | Losses on hedge accounting, net of taxes | | | | | (79,618) | (79,618) | | (79,618) | Internal changes in shareholders' equity | | | (99,066) | 99,066 | | | | | Reversal of statutory working capital reserve | | | (99,066) | 99,066 | | | | | Non-controlling interests in subsidiaries | | | | | | | 73,067 | 73,067 | Balances at December 31, 2014 | 4,540,000 | 30 | 1,131,298 | | 25,140 | 5,696,468 | 38,507 | 5,734,975 | Capital transactions with shareholders | | | (284,390) | | | (284,390) | | (284,390) | Treasury shares acquired | | | (9,390) | | | (9,390) | | (9,390) | Declared dividends (R$493.53 per thousand shares) | | | (275,000) | | | (275,000) | | (275,000) | Total comprehensive income | | | | 1,257,896 | 994,773 | 2,252,669 | 358,055 | 2,610,724 | Profit for the year | | | | 1,257,896 | | 1,257,896 | 358,055 | 1,615,951 | Other comprehensive income | | | | | 994,773 | 994,773 | | 994,773 | Cumulative translation adjustments for the period | | | | | 530,540 | 530,540 | | 530,540 | Actuarial gains on defined benefit pension plan | | | | | 92,823 | 92,823 | | 92,823 | Loss on available-for-sale assets, net of taxes | | | | | (273,506) | (273,506) | | (273,506) | Gain on percentage change in investments | | | | | 1,980 | 1,980 | | 1,980 | Gain on hedge accounting, net of taxes | | | | | (1,281,592) | (1,281,592) | | (1,281,592) | Gain on net investment hedge | | | | | (20,148) | (20,148) | | (20,148) | Gain on business combination | | | | | 1,944,076 | 1,944,076 | | 1,944,676 | Internal changes in shareholders' equity | | | 1,257,896 | (1,257,896) | | | 674,354 | 674,354 | Earnings reserve | | | 1,257,896 | (1,257,896) | | | 674,354 | 674,354 | Balances at December 31, 2015 | 4,540,000 | 30 | 2,104,804 | | 1,019,913 | 7,664,747 | 1,070,916 | 8,735,663 |
F-6
(Expressed in thousands of reais – R$, unless otherwise stated)
1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional - "CSN"“CSN”, alsoreferred to as the Company, is a publicly-held company incorporated on April 9, 1941, under the laws of the Federative Republic of Brazil (Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional, its subsidiaries, joint ventures, joint operations and associates and jointly controlled entitiesare collectively referred to herein as the "Group”). The Company’s registered office is located in São Paulo.Paulo, SP, Brazil. CSN has shares listed on the São Paulo Stock Exchange (BM&F BOVESPA) and on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). Accordingly, itthe Company reports its information to the Brazilian Securities Commission (CVM) and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Group's main operating activities are divided into five (5) operating segments as follows: The Company’s main industrial facility is the Presidente Vargas Steel Mill (“UPV”), located in the city of Volta Redonda, State of Rio de Janeiro. This segment consolidates the operations related to the production, distribution and sale of flat steel, long steel, metallic containers and galvanized steel. In addition to the facilities in Brazil, CSN has operations in the United States, Portugal and Germany, aimed at gainingall of them are in line with the plan to achieve new markets and performingperform excellent services for final consumers. Its steels aresteel has been used in the home appliances, civil construction and automobile industries. The production of iron ore is developed in the city of Congonhas, in the State of Minas Gerais. Iron ore is sold basically in the international market, especially in Europe and Asia. The prices charged in these markets are historically cyclical and subject to significant fluctuations over short periods of time, driven by several factors related to global demand, strategies adopted by the major steel producers and the foreign exchange rate. All these factors are beyond the Company’s control. The ore transportation isaccomplished by TECAR, a solid bulk terminal, one of the four terminals that compose the Port of Itaguai, located in Rio de Janeiro, which was transferred to the subsidiary CSN Congonhas Minérios S.A. on 31, December 2015. Imports of coal and coke are made through this terminal to the steel industry of CSN. From November 30, 2015 the Company has transferred its mining assets, which includes the mine Casa de Pedra and the terminal TECAR, to its subsidiary Congonhas Minérios S.A. In the new structure, Congonhas Minérios S.A. also stared to control Namisa trough out a business combination transaction, the details are described in note 3. It further tin mines, tinbased in the State of Rondônia, is engaged to supply the needs of UPV, with the excess of these raw materials being sold to subsidiaries and third parties. CSN holds the concession to operate TECAR, a solid bulk terminal, one of the 4 (four) terminals that comprise the Itaguaí Port, in Rio de Janeiro. Importations of coal and coke are carried out through this terminal. CSN·Cement:
CSN entered in the cement market boosted by the synergy between this new activity and its already existing businesses. Next to the Presidente Vargas Steel Mill in Volta Redonda (RJ), it is installed a new business unit: CSN Cimentos, which produces CP-III type of cement by using slag produced by the UPV blast furnaces in Volta Redonda. It also explores limestone and dolomite at the Arches driveArcos unit, in the State of Minas Gerais, to supplysatisfy the needs of UPV andas of the cement plant. ·Logistics Railroads: CSN has equity interests in twothree railroad companies: MRS Logística S. A., which manages the former Southeast NetworkRailway System of Rede Ferroviária Federal S.A. (RFFSA), and Transnordestina Logística S. A. (“TLSA”) and FTL - Ferrovia Transnordestina F-7
Logística S.A. (“FTL”), which operatesoperate the former Northeast NetworkRailway System of the RFFSA, in the statesStates of Maranhão, Piauí, Ceará, Rio Grande do Norte, Paraíba, Pernambuco and Alagoas.Alagoas, with TLSA being responsible for the sections of Missão Velha-Salgueiro, Salgueiro-Trindade, Trindade-Eliseu Martins, Salgueiro-Porto de Suape and Missão Velha-Porto de Pecém (Railway System II) and FTL being responsible for the sections of São Luiz-Mucuripe, Arrojado-Recife, Itabaiana-Cabedelo, Paula Cavalcante-Macau and Propriá-Jorge Lins (Railway System I). Ports:Ports:
In the State of Rio de Janeiro, by means of its subsidiary Sepetiba Tecon S. A., the Company operates the Container Terminal known as Sepetiba Tecon(Tecon) at the Itaguaí Port. Located in the Bayharbor of Sepetiba, this port has a privileged highway, railroad and maritime access. Tecon handles the shipments of CSN steel products, movement of containers, as well as storage, consolidation and deconsolidation of cargo. ·Energy: FS-9
AsSince the energy is fundamental in its production process, the Company invested inhas assets for generation ofto generate electric power to guaranteefor guaranteeing its self-sufficiency.
For further details on the Group's strategic investments and segments, see Note 26 - Business Segment Reporting.Information details financial information per CSN business segment.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (a)2.a) Basis of preparation
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared and are being presented in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). All the relevant information of the financial statements, and only this information, are being highlighted and correspond to those used by the Company's management. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires management to exercise its judgment in the process of applying the Company’s accounting policies. The areasIt is disclosed in the notes to this report all subjects involving a higherhigh degree of judgment or complexity or areas wherewhen assumptions and estimates are significant to the consolidated financial statements, those subjects are disclosed in the notes to this report and referrelated to the allowance for doubtful debts, allowanceprovision for inventoriesinventory losses, provision for labor, civil, tax, environmental and social security risks,contingences, depreciation, amortization, depletion, provision for impairment, deferred taxes, financial instruments and employee benefits. Actual results may differ from these estimates. The financial statements are presented in thousands of Brazilian reais (R$). Depending on the applicable IFRS standard, the measurement criterioncriteria used in preparing the financial statements considers the historical cost, net realizable value, fair value or recoverable amount. When the IFRS allows us to option between acquisition cost and other measurement criteria, the acquisition cost was the criteria used. The consolidated financial statements were approved by the Board of Directorsadministration and authorized forissue on April 23, 2013.May11, 2016. (b)2.b) Consolidated financial statements
The accounting policies have been consistently applied to all consolidated companies. The consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 20122015 and 20112014 include the following direct and indirect subsidiaries, joint ventures and jointly controlled entities,joint operations, as well as the exclusive funds Diplic, Mugen and Vértice, as follows: FS-10
| | Equity interests (%) | | | | Equity interests (%) | | | Companies | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | | Main activities | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | | Core business | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Direct interest in subsidiaries: full consolidation | | | | | | | | | | | | | CSN Islands VII Corp. | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Financial transactions | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Financial transactions | CSN Islands VIII Corp. | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Financial transactions | | CSN Islands IX Corp. | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Financial transactions | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Financial transactions | CSN Islands X Corp. | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Financial transactions | | CSN Islands X Corp. (1) | | | | | 100.00 | | Financial transactions | CSN Islands XI Corp. | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Financial transactions | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Financial transactions | CSN Islands XII Corp. | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Financial transactions | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Financial transactions | Tangua Inc. (1) | | | | 100.00 | | Financial transactions | | International Investment Fund | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Equity interests and financial transactions | | CSN Minerals S.L.U. | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Equity interests | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Equity interests | CSN Export Europe, S.L.U. | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Financial transactions and equity interests | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Financial transactions and Equity interests | CSN Metals S.L.U. | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Equity interests and financial transactions | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Equity interests and Financial transactions | CSN Americas S.L.U. | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Equity interests and financial transactions | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Equity interests and Financial transactions | CSN Steel S.L.U. | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Equity interests and financial transactions | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Equity interests and Financial transactions | TdBB S.A | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Dormant company | | TdBB S.A (*) | | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Equity interests | Sepetiba Tecon S.A. | | 99.99 | | 99.99 | | Port services | | 99.99 | | 99.99 | | Port services | Mineração Nacional S.A. | | 99.99 | | 99.99 | | Mining and equity interests | | 99.99 | | 99.99 | | Mining and Equity interests | Florestal Nacional S.A. | | 99.99 | | 99.99 | | Reforestation | | Companhia Florestal do Brasil | | | 99.99 | | 99.99 | | Reforestation | Estanho de Rondônia S.A. | | 99.99 | | 99.99 | | Tin mining | | 99.99 | | 99.99 | | Tin Mining | Cia Metalic Nordeste | | 99.99 | | 99.99 | | Manufacture of packaging and distribution of steel products | | 99.99 | | 99.99 | | Manufacture of containers and distribution of steel products | Companhia Metalúrgica Prada | | 99.99 | | 99.99 | | Manufacture of packaging and distribution of steel products | | 99.99 | | 99.99 | | Manufacture of containers and distribution of steel products | CSN Cimentos S.A. | | 99.99 | | 99.99 | | Cement manufacturing | | CSN Gestão de Recursos Financeiros Ltda. | | 99.99 | | 99.99 | | Dormant company | | CSN Cimentos S.A. (2) | | | | | 100.00 | | Cement manufacturing | CSN Gestão de Recursos Financeiros Ltda. (*) | | | 99.99 | | 99.99 | | Management of funds and securities portfolio | Congonhas Minérios S.A. | | 99.99 | | 99.99 | | Mining and equity interests | | 87.52 | | 99.99 | | Mining and Equity interests | CSN Energia S.A. | | 99.99 | | 99.99 | | Sale of electric power | | 99.99 | | 99.99 | | Sale of electric power | Transnordestina Logística S.A. | | 76.13 | | 70.91 | | Railroad logistics | | TFNE - Transnordestina Ferrovias do Nordeste S.A. | | 99.99 | | | | Railroad logistics | | FTL - Ferrovia Transnordestina Logística S.A. | | | 89.79 | | 88.41 | | Railroad logistics | Nordeste Logística S.A. | | | 99.99 | | | | Port services | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Indirect interest in subsidiaries: full consolidation | | | | | | | | | | | | | CSN Aceros S.A. | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Equity interests | | Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional LLC | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Steel | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Steel | CSN Europe Lda. | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Financial transactions, product sales and equity interests | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Financial transactions, product sales and Equity interests | CSN Ibéria Lda. | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Financial transactions, product sales and equity interests | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Financial transactions, product sales and Equity interests | CSN Portugal, Unipessoal Lda. | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Financial transactions and product sales | | Lusosider Projectos Siderúrgicos S.A. | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Equity interests | | 99.94 | | 99.94 | | Equity interests and product sales | Lusosider Aços Planos, S. A. | | 99.94 | | 99.94 | | Steel and equity interests | | 99.99 | | 99.99 | | Steel and Equity interests | CSN Acquisitions, Ltd. | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Financial transactions and equity interests | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Financial transactions and Equity interests | CSN Resources S.A. | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Financial transactions and equity interests | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Financial transactions and Equity interests | CSN Finance (UK) Ltd (1) | | | | 100.00 | | Financial transactions and equity interests | | CSN Holdings (UK) Ltd | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Financial transactions and equity interests | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Financial transactions and Equity interests | CSN Handel GmbH | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Financial transactions, product sales and equity interests | | 87.52 | | 100.00 | | Financial transactions, product sales and Equity interests | Companhia Brasileira de Latas | | 59.17 | | 59.17 | | Sale of cans and containers in general and equity interests | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Sale of cans and containers in general and Equity interests | Rimet Empreendimentos Industriais e Comerciais S. A. | | 58.96 | | 58.08 | | Production and sale of steel containers and forestry | | Rimet Empreendimentos Industriais e Comerciais S. A. (3) | | | | | 100.00 | | Production and sale of steel containers and forestry | Companhia de Embalagens Metálicas MMSA | | 58.98 | | 58.98 | | Production and sale of cans and related activities | | 99.67 | | 99.67 | | Production and sale of cans and related activities | Empresa de Embalagens Metálicas - LBM Ltda. | | 58.98 | | 58.98 | | Sales of containers and holding interests in other entities | | Empresa de Embalagens Metálicas - MUD Ltda. | | 58.98 | | 58.98 | | Production and sale of household appliances and related products | | Empresa de Embalagens Metálicas - MTM do Nordeste | | 58.98 | | 58.98 | | Production and sale of cans and related activities | | Companhia de Embalagens Metálicas - MTM | | 58.98 | | 58.98 | | Production and sale of cans and related activities | | 99.67 | | 99.67 | | Production and sale of cans and related activities | CSN Steel Comercializadora, S.L.U. (2) | | 100.00 | | | | Financial transactions, product sales and equity interests | | CSN Steel Holdings 1, S.L.U. (2) | | 100.00 | | | | Financial transactions, product sales and equity interests | | CSN Steel Holdings 2, S.L.U. (2) | | 100.00 | | | | Financial transactions, product sales and equity interests | | Stalhwerk Thüringen GmbH (2) | | 100.00 | | | | Production and sale of long steel and related activities | | CSN Steel Sections UK Limited (2) | | 100.00 | | | | Financial transactions, product sales and equity interests | | CSN Steel Sections Czech Republic s.r.o. (2) | | 100.00 | | | | Financial transactions, product sales and equity interests | | CSN Steel Sections Polska Sp.Z.o.o (2) | | 100.00 | | | | Financial transactions, product sales and equity interests | | CSN Steel Holdings 1, S.L.U. | | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Financial transactions, product sales and Equity interests | CSN Productos Siderúrgicos S.L. (4) | | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Financial transactions, product sales and Equity interests | Stalhwerk Thüringen GmbH | | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Production and sale of long steel and related activities | CSN Steel Sections UK Limited (*) | | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Sale of long steel | CSN Steel Sections Polska Sp.Z.o.o | | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Financial transactions, product sales and Equity interests | CSN Asia Limited | | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Commercial representation | Namisa International Minérios SLU | | | 87.52 | | | | Financial transactions, product sales and Equity interests | Namisa Europe, Unipessoal Lda. | | | 87.52 | | | | Equity interests, product and iron ore sales | Namisa Handel GmbH | | | 87.52 | | | | Financial transactions, product sales and Equity interests | Namisa Asia Limited | | | 87.52 | | | | Commercial representation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Direct interest in jointly controlled entities: proportionate consolidation | | | | | | Nacional Minérios S.A. | | 60.00 | | 60.00 | | Mining and equity interests | | Direct interest in joint operations: proportionate consolidation | | | | | | | | Itá Energética S.A. | | 48.75 | | 48.75 | | Electric power generation | | 48.75 | | 48.75 | | Electric power generation | CGPAR - Construção Pesada S.A. | | | 50.00 | | 50.00 | | Mining support services and Equity interests | Consórcio da Usina Hidrelétrica de Igarapava | | | 17.92 | | 17.92 | | Electric power consortium | | | | | | | | | Direct interest in joint ventures: equity method | | | | | | | | Nacional Minérios S.A. (5) | | | | | 60.00 | | Mining and Equity interests | MRS Logística S.A. | | 27.27 | | 27.27 | | Railroad transportation | | 18.64 | | 27.27 | | Railroad transportation | Consórcio da Usina Hidrelétrica de Igarapava | | 17.92 | | 17.92 | | Electric power consortium | | Aceros Del Orinoco S.A. | | 22.73 | | 22.73 | | Dormant company | | 31.82 | | 31.82 | | Dormant company | CBSI - Companhia Brasileira de Serviços de Infraestrutura | | 50.00 | | 50.00 | | Provision of services | | 50.00 | | 50.00 | | Equity interests and product sales and iron ore | CGPAR - Construção Pesada S.A. (3) | | 50.00 | | | | Mining support services and equity interests | | Transnordestina Logística S.A. | | | 56.92 | | 62.64 | | Railroad logistics | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Indirect interest in jointly controlled entities: proportionate consolidation | | | | | | Indirect interest in joint ventures: equity method | | | | | | | | Namisa International Minérios SLU | | 60.00 | | 60.00 | | Financial transactions, product sales and equity interests | | | | 60.00 | | Financial transactions, product sales and Equity interests | Namisa Europe, Unipessoal Lda. | | 60.00 | | 60.00 | | Equity interests and sales of products and minerals | | | | 60.00 | | Equity interests, product and iron ore sales | Namisa Handel GmbH (4) | | 60.00 | | 60.00 | | Financial transactions, product sales and equity interests | | Namisa Handel GmbH | | | | | 60.00 | | Financial transactions, product sales and Equity interests | MRS Logística S.A. | | 6.00 | | 6.00 | | Railroad transportation | | 16.30 | | 6.00 | | Railroad transportation | Aceros Del Orinoco S.A. | | 9.08 | | 9.08 | | Dormant company | | Namisa Asia Limited | | | | | 60.00 | | Commercial representation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Direct interest in associates: equity method | | | | | | | | | | | | | Arvedi Metalfer do Brasil S.A. (5) | | 20.00 | | | | Metallurgy and equity interests | | Arvedi Metalfer do Brasil S.A. | | | 20.00 | | 20.00 | | Metallurgy and Equity interests |
(*) They are Dormant Companies, therefore they do not appear in the note 9.a, where is disclosed business information under the equity method. F-9
(1)Companies liquidated Company terminated in 2012.December 2015 due to the merger with CSN Islands VII; (2)Companies acquired on January 31, 2012 (see note 9.e). Company incorporated in May 2015; (3)Equity interest acquired Company was incorporated in July 2012 (see note 9.d).November 2015; (4)New corporate name of Aloadus Handel Gmbh, changed on August 13, 2012.CSN Steel Holdings 2, S.L.U. amended in May 2015; (5) Company incorporated in December 2015 by Congonhas Minérios S.A. (note 9). (5)Equity interest acquired on July 31, 2012 (see note 9.f).
FS-11
· Exclusive Fundsfunds | Exclusive funds | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | | Core business | Direct interest: full consolidation | | | | | | | Diplic - Private credit balanced mutual fund | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Investment fund | Mugen - Private credit balanced mutual fund | | | | 100.00 | | Investment fund | Caixa Vértice - Private credit balanced mutual fund | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Investment fund | BB Steel - Private credit balanced mutual fund | | 100.00 | | | | Investment fund | |
| | Equity interests (%) | | | Exclusive Funds | | 31/12/2012 | | 31/12/2011 | | Main activities | | | | | | | | Direct interests: full consolidation | | | | | | | Diplic - Balanced mutual fund | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Investment fund | Mugen - Balanced mutual fund | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Investment fund | Caixa Vértice - Balanced mutual fund privite credit | | 100.00 | | 100.00 | | Investment fund |
In preparing the preparation of the consolidated financial statements the following consolidation procedures have been applied: ·Transactions between subsidiaries, associates, joint ventures and joint operations Unrealized gains on transactions with subsidiaries, joint ventures and jointly controlled entitiesassociates are eliminated to the extent of CSN’s equity interests in the related entity inby the consolidation process. Unrealized losses are eliminated in the same manner as unrealized gains, although only to the extent that there are not indications of impairment. The Company eliminates the effect on profit or loss of transactions carried out with joint ventures and, as a result, reclassifies part of the equity in results of joint ventures to financial costs, cost of sales and income tax and social contribution. The base date ofto the financial statements of the subsidiaries and jointly controlled entitiesjoint ventures is the same as that of the Company, and their accounting policies are also in line with the policies adopted by the Company.CSN. Subsidiaries are all entities (including special purpose entities) over which the Company has the power to determine the financial and operating policies generally accompanying a shareholding of more than one half ofcan be conducted by the voting rights.Company and when it is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to use its power to affect its returns. The existence and effect of potential voting rights that are actually exercisable or convertible are taken into consideration when assessing whether the Company controls another entity. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date when the control is transferred to the Company and are deconsolidated from the date when such control ceases. ·Joint controlledventures and joint operations
Joint arrangements are all entities over which the Company has joint control with one or more other parties. The investments in joint arrangements are classified as joint operations or joint ventures depending on the contractual rights and obligations of each investor. Joint operations are accounted for in the financial statements in order to represent the Company's contractual rights and obligations. Therefore, the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses related to its interests in joint operations are accounted for individually in the financial statements. Joint ventures are accounted for under the equity method and are not consolidated. The Company eliminates the effect on profit or loss of transactions carried out with joint ventures and, as a result, eliminates part of the equity in results of joint ventures to financial statementscosts, cost of jointly controlled entities are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date when shared control starts through the date when shared control ceases to exist. Jointly controlled entities are proportionately consolidated.sales, net sales and income tax and social contribution. F-10
Associates are all entities over which the Company has significant influence but not control, generally through a shareholding ofpercentage from 20% up to 50% of the voting rights. Investments in associates are accounted for under the equity method of accounting and are initially recognized at cost. · Transactions and non-controlling interests The Company treats transactions with non-controlling interests as transactions with owners of Company equity.the Company. For purchases from non-controlling interests, the difference between any consideration paid and the relevant share acquired of the carrying value of subsidiary net assets of the subsidiary is recorded in shareholders' equity. Gains and losses on disposals to non-controlling interests are also recognized directly in shareholders' equity, in line item “Valuation adjustments to equity”. When the Company no longer holds control, any retained interest in the entity is remeasured to its fair value, with the change in the carrying amount recognized in profit or loss. The fair value is the initial carrying amount for the purposes of subsequently accounting for the retained interest in an associate, joint venture or financial asset. In addition, any amounts previously recognized in other comprehensive income in respect of that entity are accounted for as if the Company had directly disposed of the related assets or liabilities. This may mean that amounts previously recognized in other comprehensive income are reclassified to profit or loss. (c)2.c) Foreign currencies
i. Functional and presentation currency Items included in the financial statements ofare related to each one of the Company's subsidiaries are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the subsidiary operates (“functional currency”). The consolidated financialstatements are presented in Brazilian reais (R$), which is the Company’s functional currency and the Group’s presentation currency. FS-12
ii. BalancesTransactions and transactionsbalances Transactions in foreign currencies are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates in effect at the dates of the transactions or valuation on which itemsvaluations when their values are remeasured. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of thesethose transactions and from the translation at exchange rates in effect as of December 31, 2012 of2015 related to monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are recognized in the income statement, except when they are recognized in shareholders' equity as qualifying cash flow hedges and qualifying net investment hedges.a result of monetary items of foreign operation characterized as foreign investment. The assetbalances of assets and liability balancesliabilities are translated at theby exchange rate in effectrates prevailing at the end of the reporting period. As of December 31, 2012,2015, US$1 is equivalentequal to R$3.9048(R$2,0435 (R$1,8758 as of2.6562 at December 31, 2011), EUR 12014) and €1 is equivalentequal to R$2,69544.2504 (R$2,4342 as of3.2270 at December 31, 2011), JPY 1 is equivalent to R$0.02372 (R$0.02431 as of December 31, 2011)2014). All other foreign exchange gains and losses, including foreign exchange gains and losses related to loansborrowings and cash and cash equivalents, are presented in the income statement as finance income or costs. Changes in the fair value of monetary securities denominated in foreign currency, classified as available-for-sale, are segregated into translationexchange differences resulting from changes inrelated to the amortized cost of the security and other changes in the carrying amount of the security. Exchange differences related to changes in amortized cost are recognized in profit or loss, and other changes in the carrying amount are recognized in shareholders' equity. Exchange differences on non-monetary financial assets and liabilities classified as measured at fair value through profit or loss are recognized in profit or loss as part of the gain or loss on the fair value. Exchange differences on non-monetary financial assets, such as investments in shares classified as available-for-sale are included in comprehensive income in shareholders' equity. Starting 2012, in view of the changes in operations of the subsidiary Namisa Europe, its functional currency changed from the US dollar to the Brazilian real.
F-11
iii. Group companies The results and financial position of all the Group’s entities (none of which has the currency of a hyper-inflationary economy) that have a functional currency different from the reportingpresentation currency are translated into the reportingpresentation currency as follows: · AssetsThe assets and liabilities inof each balance sheet presented have beenare translated at theby exchange rate at the end of the reporting period; · IncomeThe income and expenses of each income statement are translated at average exchange rates (unless this average is not a reasonable approximation of the cumulative effect of the rates in effect at the transaction dates, in which case income and expenses are translated at the rate in effect at the transaction dates); and · All resulting exchange differences are recognized as a separate component in other comprehensive income.income; and ·Gains and losses accumulated in shareholders' equity are included in the income statement when the foreign operation is partially disposed or sold. On consolidation, exchange differences resulting from the translation of monetary items with characteristics of net investment in foreign operations are recognized in shareholders' equity. When a foreign operation is partly disposed of or sold, exchange differences previously recorded ininto other comprehensive income are recognized in the income statement as part of the gain or loss on sale. (d)2.d) Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, and in banksbank accounts and other short-term highly liquid investments redeemable within 90 days from the end of the reporting period, readily convertible into a known amount of cash andsubject to an insignificant risk of change in value. Certificates of deposit that can be redeemed at any time without penalties are considered as cash equivalents. FS-13
(e)2.e) Trade receivables
Trade receivables are initially recognized at fair value, including the related taxes and expenses. Foreign currency-denominated trade receivables are adjusted at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the reporting period. The allowance for estimated losses on doubtful debts were recognized in an amount considered sufficient to cover any losses. Management’s assessment takes into consideration the customer’s history and financial position, as well as the opinion of our legal counsel regarding the collection of these receivables for recognizing the allowance.allowance for estimated losses. (f)2.f) InventoriesInventories
Inventories are carried at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost is determined using the weighted average cost method on the acquisition of raw materials. The costs of finished productsgoods and work in process comprise raw materials, labor and other direct costs (based on the normal production capacity). Net realizable value represents the estimated selling price in the normal course of business, less estimated costs of completion and costs necessary to make the sale. EstimatedThe allowance for estimated losses foron slow-moving or obsolete inventories are recognized when considered appropriate.necessary. Stockpiled ore inventories are accounted for as processed when removed from the mine. The cost of finished productsgoods comprises all direct costs necessary to transform stockpiled inventories into finished products.goods. (g)2.g) InvestmentsInvestments
Investments in jointly controlled entitiessubsidiaries, joint ventures and associates are accounted for under the equity method of accounting and are initially recognized at cost. The gains or losses are recognized in profit or loss as operating income (or expenses). In the case of foreign exchange differences arising on translating foreign investments that have a functional currency different from the Company’s, changes in investments due exclusively to foreign exchange differences, as well as F-12
adjustments to pension plans and available-for-sale investments that impact the subsidiaries’ shareholders' equity, are recognized in line item “Cumulative translation adjustments”, in the Company’s shareholders' equity, and are only recognized in profit or loss when the investment is disposed of or written off due to impairment loss. Other investments are recognized and maintained at cost or fair value. When necessary, the accounting policies of subsidiaries, joint ventures and jointly controlled entitiesassociates are changed to ensure consistency and uniformity of criteria with the policies adopted by the Company. (h)2h) Business combination
The acquisition method is used to account for on each business combination conducted by the Company. The considerationpayment obligation transferred forby acquiring a subsidiaryan entity is measured by the fair value of the assets transferred, liabilities incurred and equity instruments issued by the Company. The consideration transferred includes the fair value of any asset or liability resulting from a contingent consideration arrangement, where applicable. Acquisition-related costs are recognized in profit or loss for the year, as incurred. Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination are initially measured at their fair values at the acquisition date. The Company recognizes non-controlling interests in the acquiree according to the proportional non-controlling interest held in the fair value of the acquiree’s new assets (see note 3).net assets. (i)2.i) Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost of acquisition, formation or construction, less accumulated depreciation or depletion and any impairment loss. Depreciation is calculated under the straight-line method based on the remaining economic useful economic lives of assets, as mentioned in note 10. The depletion of mines is calculated based on the quantity of ore mined (units of production).mined. Land is not depreciated since their useful life is considered indefinite. However, if the tangible assets are mine-specific, that is, used in the mining activity, they are depreciated over the shorter ofbetween the normal useful lives of such assets orand the useful life of the mine. The Company recognizes in the carrying amount of property, plant and equipment the cost of replacement and consequently reducing the carrying amount of the part that it is replacingreplaced if it is probable that future economic benefits embodied therein will revert to the Company, and if the cost of the asset can be reliably measured. All other disbursements are expensed as incurred. Borrowing costs related to funds obtained for construction in progress are capitalized until these projects are completed. FS-14
If some components of property, plant and equipment have different useful lives, these components are separately recognized asaccounted for in separate line items of property, plant and equipment items.equipment. Gains and losses on disposal are determined by comparing the sale value less the residual value and are recognized in ‘Other operating income (expenses)’. Mineral rights acquired are classified as other assets in property, plant and equipment.
Exploration expenditures are recognized as expenses until the viability of mining activities is established;established, after this period the subsequent development costs are capitalized. Exploration and valuation expenditures include: · Research and analysis of explorationhistorical data related to area historical data;exploration; · Topographic, geological, geochemical and geophysical studies; · Determine the mineral asset’s volume and quality/grade of deposits;grade; · Examine and test the extraction processes and methods; · Topographic surveys of transportation and infrastructure needs; · Market studies and financial studies.studies; The development costs for the development offrom new mineral deposits or from capacity expansion in mines in operationmine operations are capitalized and amortized using the produced (extracted) units method based on the probable and proven ore quantities. The development stage includes: · Drillings to define the ore body; · Access and draining plans; · Advance removal of overburden (top soil and waste material removed prior to initial mining of the ore body) and waste material (non-economic material that is intermingled with the ore body). F-13
Stripping costs (the costs associated with the removal of overburdenedoverburden and other waste materials) incurred during the development of a mine, before production commences, they are capitalized as part of the depreciable cost of developing the property. Such costs are subsequently amortized over the useful life of the mine based on proven and probable reserves. Post-production strippingStripping costs in the production phase are included in the cost of the inventory produced, (thatexcept when a specific extraction campaign is extracted), at each mine individually duringmade to access deeper deposits than where the period that strippingore body is located. In these cases, costs are incurred.capitalized and taken to noncurrent assets when the mineral ore deposit is extracted and are amortized over the useful life of the ore body.
The Company holds spare parts that will be used to replace parts of property, plant and equipment and that willused to increase the asset’s useful life and the useful life of whichwhen it exceeds 12 months. These spare parts are classified in property, plant and equipment and not in inventories. (j)2.i) Intangible assets
Intangible assets comprise assets acquired from third parties, including through business combinations and/or those internally generated.combinations. These assets are recognized at cost of acquisition or formation, less amortization calculated on a straight-line basis based on the exploration or recovery periods (which represents the useful lives of the assets).periods. Mineral rights acquired are classified in line item “other assets” in intangible assets. Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives and goodwill based on expected future profitability are not amortized. · Goodwill Goodwill represents the positive difference between the amount paid and/or payable for the acquisition of a business and the net fair values of the acquiree´s assets and liabilities of the acquiree.liabilities. Goodwill on acquisitions of subsidiaries is recognized as ‘Intangible assets’intangible assets in the consolidated financial statements. In the individual balance sheet, goodwill is included in investments. Negative goodwillThe gain on purchase is recognized as a gain in profit for the period at the acquisition date. Goodwill is annuallytested for impairment. Impairment losses on goodwill are not reversed. Gains and losses on the disposal of a Cash-Generating Unit (CGU) include the carrying amount of goodwill related to the CGU sold. FS-15
Goodwill is allocated to CGUs for impairment testing purposes. The allocation is made to Cash-Generating Units or groups of Cash-Generating Units that are expected to benefit from the business combination fromin which the goodwill arose, and therecalling that unit is not greater than the operating segment. · Software Software licenses purchased are capitalized based on the costs incurred to purchase the software and make it ready for use. These costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of 1from one to 5five years. (k)2.k) Impairment of non-financial assets
Assets with infinite useful lives, such as goodwill, are not subject to amortization and are annually tested for impairment. Assets subject to amortization and/or depreciation, such as property, plant and equipment, are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized atby the amount by which the carrying amountexciding value of an asset exceeds itsasset´s recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of the fair value of an asset less costs to sell and its value in use. For impairment testing purposes, assets are grouped at their lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows (Cash Generating Units, -or CGUs). Non-financial assets, except for goodwill, that are considered impaired are subsequently reviewed for possible reversal of the impairment at the reporting date. F-14
(l)2.l) Employee benefits
i. Employee benefits Defined contribution plans A defined contribution plan is as a post-employment benefit plan whereby an entity pays fixed contributions to a separate entity (pension fund) and will not have any legal or constructive obligation to pay additional amounts. Obligations for contributions to defined contribution pension plans are recognized as employee benefit expenses in the income statement for the periods during which services are provided by employees. Contributions paid in advance are recognized asfor an asset on conditionsince it is agreed that either cash reimbursement or future reduction in future payments is available.on payables will flow back to CSN. Contributions to a defined contribution plan that is expected to mature twelve (12) months after the end of the period in which the employee provides services are discounted to their present values. Defined benefit plans A defined benefit plan is a post-employment benefit plan other than a defined contribution plan. The Company’s net obligation regarding defined pension benefit plans is calculated individually for each plan by estimating the value of the future benefit that the employees accrue as return for services provided in the current period and in prior periods; such benefit is discounted to its present value. Any unrecognized costs of past services and the fair values of any plan assets are deducted. The discount rate is the yield presented at the end of the reporting period for top line debt securities whose maturity dates approximate the terms and conditions of the Company’s obligations and which are denominated in the same currency as the one in which it is expected that the benefits will be paid. The calculation is made annually by a qualified actuary using the projected unit credit method. When the calculation results in a benefit for the Company, the asset to be recognized is limited to the total amount of any unrecognized costs of past services and the present value of the economic benefits available in the form of future plan reimbursements or reduction in future contributions to the plan. In calculating the present value of economic benefits, consideration is given to any minimum funding requirements that apply to any Company plan. An economic benefit is available to the Company if it is realizable during the life of the plan or upon settlement of the plan’s liabilities. The Company and some of its subsidiaries offered a postretirement healthcare benefit to its employees. The right to these benefits is usually contingent to their remaining in employment until the retirement age and the completion of the minimum length of service. The expected costs of these benefits are accumulated during the employment period, and wereare calculated using the same accounting method used for defined benefit pension plans. These obligations are annually evaluatedvalued by qualified independent actuaries. FS-16
When the benefits of a plan are increased, the portion of the increased benefit related to past services of employees is recognized on a straight-line basis over the average periodin profit or loss until the benefits become vested. When the benefits become immediately vested, the expense is recognized in profit or loss. The Company has chosen to recognizerecognizes all the actuarial gains and losses resulting from defined benefit plans immediately in other comprehensive income, and subsequently are transferred to retained earnings. They are recorded in the income statement only ifincome. If the plan is extinguished. extinguished, actuarial gains and losses are recognized in profit or loss. ii. Profit sharing and bonus Employee profit sharing and executives’ variable compensation are linked to the achievement of operating and financial targets. The Company recognizes a liability and an expense substantially allocated to production cost and, where applicable, to general and administrative expenses when such goals are met. (m)2.m) ProvisionsProvisions
Provisions are recognized when: (i)when the Company has a present legalobligation (legal or constructive obligationconstructive) as a result of a past events, (ii)event, it is probable that an outflow of resourcesthe Company will be required to settle the obligation and it has reliable cost estimation. The amount recognized as a provision is the best value estimation required to settle the present obligation at the end of the reporting period, taking into account the risks and (iii)uncertainties surrounding the amount can be reliably measured. Provisions are determined discountingobligation. When a provision is measured using the expected future cash flows based on a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessmentsestimated to settle the present obligation, its carrying amount is the present value of thosecash flows (when the effect of the time value of money and, where appropriate, the specific risksis material). When some or all of the liability. economic benefits required to settle a provision are expected to be recovered from a third party, a receivable is recognized as an asset if it is probable that reimbursement will be received and that the amount of the receivable can be measured reliably. F-15
(n)2.n) ConcessionsConcessions
The Company has governmentgovernmental concessions to provide the following types of services: railway and theirport transportation managed by Company´s subsidiaries and joint-ventures. The concessions included in the consolidated financial statements are related to the rail network in the Northeast area, managed by the subsidiary FTL, the container terminal in Itaguaí, managed by the subsidiary TECON and the port terminal TECAR for exporting iron ore and importing coal, which is managed by the subsidiary Congonhas. The joint venture concessions are related to TLSA and MRS and are not disclosed in these financial statements. The Company´s concession contracts are not within the scope of the international interpretative standard IFRIC 12, considering that the grantor (refers to the government) has effectively no control over what, to whom and at what price the services will be provided by the dealer (refers to the private part) to the customers. In essence, the payments made under our concession contracts has operating leasing characteristics. Therefore, the accounting should follow the accounting rules applicable to leases – IAS 17. Our concession agreements provide for the use of a specific asset for an agreed period of time, but without any transfer of ownership to the Company or option to buy these assets after the completion of these contracts. These payments are classified as operating leases.recognized in the income statement on a straight line basis over the period of the contracts. Assets acquired or constructed by us are recorded in property, plant or equipment or in intangible assets, when applicable, according to the parameters defined in IAS16 and IAS 38. Under our agreements, we have control over these assets and assume the risks and rewards associated with them. At the end of the concession, if there is any residual value, the grantor reimburses us for these amounts.”
(o)2.o) Share capital
Common shares are classified in shareholders' equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are shown in shareholders' equity as a deduction fromto the proceeds,amount received, net of taxes. When any Company of the Group company buys Company shares (treasury shares), the amount paid, including any directly attributable additional costs (net of income tax), is deducted from shareholders' equity attributable to owners of the Company until the shares are canceled or reissued. When these shares are subsequently reissued, any amount received, net of any directly attributable additional transaction costs and the related income tax and social contribution effects, is included in shareholders' equity attributable to owners of the Company. (p)2.p) Revenue recognition
Operating revenue from the sale of goods in the normal course of business is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable.receivables. Revenue is recognized when there is convincing evidence that the most significant risks and rewards of ownership of goods have been transferred to the buyer, it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the entity, the associated costs and possible return of goods can be reliably estimated, there is no continued involvement with the goods sold, and the amount of the operating revenue can be reliably measured. If it is probable that discounts will be granted and the value thereof can be reliably measured, then the discount is recognized as a reduction of the operating revenue as sales are recognized. Revenue from services provided is recognized as it is realized. The appropriate timing for transfer of risks and rewards varies depending on the individual terms and conditions of the sales contract. For international sales, this timing depends on the incotermstype of term of the contract.contract term. F-16
(q)2.q) Finance income and finance costs
Finance income includes interest income from funds invested (including(except available-for-sale financial assets), dividend income (except for dividends received from investeesnot accounted for under the equity method, in Company), gains on disposal of available-for-sale financial assets, changes in the fair value of financial assets measured at fair value throughprofit or loss, and gains on hedgingderivative instruments that are recognized in profit or loss. Interest income is recognized in profit or loss under the effective interest method. Dividend income is recognized in profit or loss when the Company’s right to receive payment has been established. Distributions received from investees accounted for under the equity method reduce the investment value. FS-17
Finance costs comprise interest expenses on borrowings, net of the discount to present value of the provisions, dividends on preferred shares classified as liabilities, losses inon the fair value of financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss, impairment losses recognized in financial assets, and losses on hedgingderivative instruments that are recognized in profit or loss. Borrowing costs that are not directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset are measured through profit or loss under the effective interest method. Foreign exchange gains and losses are reported on a net basis. (r)2.r) Income tax and social contribution
Current and deferred income tax and social contribution are calculated based on the tax laws enacted or substantially enacted by the end of the reporting period, including in the countries where the Group entities operate and generate taxable profit. Management periodically assesses the positions assumedtaken in the tax calculations with respect to situations where applicable tax regulations are open to interpretations. The CompanyGroup recognizes provisions whenwhere appropriate, based on the estimated payments to tax authorities. The income tax and social contribution expense comprises current and deferred taxes. The currentCurrent and deferred taxes are recognized in profit or loss unless they are related to business combinations or items recognized directly in shareholders' equity. Current tax is the expected tax payable or receivable on taxable profit or loss for the year at tax rates that have been enacted or substantially enacted by the end of the reporting period and any adjustment to taxes payable in relation to prior years. Deferred tax is recognized on temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and the corresponding tax bases used in the computation of taxable profit. Deferred tax is not recognized for the following temporary differences: initial recognition of assets and liabilities in a transaction that is not a business combination and does not affect either the accounting or taxable profit or loss, and differences associated with investments in subsidiaries and controlled entitiesjoint ventures when it is probable that they will not reverse in the foreseeable future. Moreover, a deferred tax liability is not recognized for taxable temporary differences resulting infrom the initial recognition of goodwill. The deferred tax is measured at the rates that are expected to be applied on temporary differences when they reverse, based on the laws that have been enacted or substantially enacted by the end of the reporting period. Current income tax and social contribution are carried at their net amounts by the taxpayer, in liabilities when there are amounts payable or in assets when prepaid amounts exceed the total amount due at the end of the reporting period. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and when they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority on the same entity subject to taxation. A deferred income tax and social contribution asset is recognized for all tax losses, tax credits, and deductible temporary differences to the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available against which those tax losses, tax credits, and deductible temporary differences can be utilized. Annually, the Company reviews and verifies the existence of future taxable income and a provision for loss is recognized when the realization of these credits is not likely in less than 10 years. F-17
Deferred income tax and social contribution assets are reviewed at the end of each reporting period and reduced to the extent that their realization is no longer probable.
2.s) Earnings/(Loss) per share (s)Earnings/(loss) per share
Basic earnings/loss per share are calculated by means of the profit/loss for the year attributable to owners of the CompanyGroup and the weighted average number of common shares outstanding in the related period. Diluted earnings/loss per share are calculated by means of the average number of shares outstanding, adjusted by instruments potentiallyconvertible into shares, with diluting effect, in the reported periods. The CompanyGroup does not have any instruments potentially convertible into shares and, accordingly, diluted earnings/loss per share are equal to basic earnings/loss per share. FS-18
(t)2.t) Environmental and restoration costs
The Company recognizes a provision for the costs of recovery of areascosts and fines when a loss is probable and the amounts of the related costs can be reliably measured. Generally, the period when the provision for providing for the amount to be used in recovery is recognized coincides with the end of a feasibility study or the commitment to adopt a formal action plan. Expenses related to compliance with environmental regulations are charged to profit or loss or capitalized, as appropriate. Capitalization is considered appropriate when the expenses refer to items that will continue to benefit the CompanyGroup and that are basically related to the acquisition and installation of equipment to control and/or prevent pollution. (u)2.u) Research and development
All these costsResearch expenditures are recognized inas expenses when incurred. Expenditures on project developments (related to the income statementdesign and testing stages of new or improved products) are recognized as intangible assets when incurred, exceptit is probable that projects will be successful, based on their commercial and technological feasibility, and only when they meet the criteria for capitalization. Research andcost can be reliably measured. When capitalized, development expenditures recognized as expense forare amortized from the year ended December 31, 2012, amounted to R$ 6,033 (R$ 6,532 as December 31,2011).start of a product commercial production, on a straight-line basis and over the period of the expected benefit.
(v)2.v) Financial instruments
i) Financial assets Financial assets are classified into the following categories: measured at fair value through profit or loss, loans and receivables, held-to-maturity and available-for- sale.available-for-sale. The classification depends on the purpose for which the financial assets were acquired. Management determines the classification of its financial assets at the time of initial recognition. · Financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are financial assets held for active and frequent trading. Derivatives are also categorized as held for trading and, accordingly, are classified in this category unless they have been designed as cash flow hedging instruments. Assets in this category are classified in current assets. · Loans and receivables This category includes loans and receivables that are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments not quoted in an active market. They are included in current assets, except those with maturity of more than 12 months after the end of the reporting period (which are classified as non-current assets). Loans and receivables include loans to associates, trade receivables, other receivables and cash and cash equivalents, except short-term investments. Cash and cash equivalents are recognized at fair value. Loans and receivables are carried at amortized cost using the effective interest method. · Held-to-maturity assets These are basically financial assets acquired with the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity. Held-to-maturity investments are initially recognized at their value plus any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, they are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment loss. F-18
· Available-for-sale financial assets These are non-derivative financial assets, designated as available-for-sale, that are not classified in any other category. They are included in non-current assets when they are strategic investments offor the Company, unless Management intends to dispose of the investment within up to 12 months from the end of the reporting period. Available-for-sale financial assets are recognized at fair value. FS-19
· Recognition and measurement Regular purchases and sales of financial assets are recognized at the trading date - the date on which the Company undertakes to buy or sell the asset. Investments are initially recognized at their fair value, plus transaction costs for all financial assets not classified as at fair value through profit or loss. Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are initially recognized at their fair value and the transaction costs are charged to the income statement. Financial assets are derecognized when the rights to receive cash flows from the investments have expired or have been transferred, in the latter case, provided that the Company has transferred significantly all risks and rewards of ownership. Available-for-sale financial assets and financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss are subsequently carried at fair value. Loans and receivables are carried at amortized cost using the effective interest method. Gains or losses resulting from changes in the fair value of financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss are presented in the income statement under “finance income” in the period in which they arise. Dividend income from financial assets at fair value through profit or loss is recognized in the income statement as part of other finance income when the Company’s right to receive the dividends has been established. ChangesThe changes in the fair value of monetary securities denominated in a foreign currency and classified as available-for-sale are segregated into translation differences resulting from changes in the amortized cost of the security and other changes in the carrying amount of the security. Exchange differences on monetary securitiesfinancial assets are recognized in profit or loss, whileas follows: (i) the effects of foreign exchange differences on non-monetary securities are recognized in shareholders' equity. Changesand the changes in the fair value of monetary and non-monetary securities classified as available-for-salethe investment in the investee’s capital are recognized directly in otherthe Company’s shareholders’ equity, in “Other comprehensive income and are only recognized in profit or loss when the investment is sold or written off as a loss.income”.
Interest on available-for-sale securities, calculated under the effective interest method, is recognized in the income statement as part of other income. Dividends from available-for-sale equity instruments, such as shares, are recognized in the income statement as part of other finance income when the Company’s right to receive payments has been established. The fair values of publicly quoted investments are based on current purchase prices. If the market for a financial asset (and for instruments not listed on a stock exchange) is not active, the Company establishes the fair value by using valuation techniques. These techniques include the use of recent transactions contracted with third parties, reference to other instruments that are substantially similar, analysis of discounted cash flows, and option pricing models that make maximum use of market inputs and relies as little as possible on entity-specific inputs. ii) Impairment of financial assets The Company assesses ofevaluates in the end of each reporting period whether there is objectivean evidence that a financial asset or a group of financial assets isareimpaired. · Assets measured at amortized cost A financial asset or a group of financial assets is impaired and impairment losses are incurred only if there is objective evidenceare evidences of impairment as a result of one or more events that occurred after the initial recognition of the asset (a “loss event”) and ,such loss event (or events) has an impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset or group of financial assets thatand the future cash flow estimation can be reliably estimated.calculated.. The criteria used by CSN to determine whether there is objective evidenceare evidences of an impairment loss include:includes: · significant financial difficulty ofweakness related to the issuer or counterparty; F-19
· a breach of contract, such as default or delinquency inat interest or principal payments; · the issuer, for economic or legal reasons relating to the borrower’s financial difficulty,weakness, grants to the borrower a concession that the lender would not otherwise consider; FS-20
· it becomingbecomes probable that the borrower will enterincur in bankruptcy or other financial reorganization; · the disappearance of an active market for thatthe related financial asset because of financial difficulties;weakness; or · observable data indicating that there is a measurable decrease in the estimated future cash flows from a portfolio of financial assets since the initial recognition of such assets, although the decrease cannot yet be identified with the individual financial assets in the portfolio, including: - adverseAdverse changes in the payment status of borrowers in the portfolio; - nationalNational or local economic conditions that correlate with defaults on the assets in the portfolio. The amount of the loss is measured asby the difference between the carrying amount of the asset and the present value of estimated future cash flows (excluding future credit losses that have not been incurred) discounted at the original effective interest rate of the financial asset. The carrying amount of the asset is reduced and the amount of the loss is recognized in the income statement. If a loan or held-to-maturity investment has a variable interest rate, the discount rate to measure an impairment loss is the current effective interest rate determined pursuant to the contract. As a practical expedient, the Company may measure impairment on the basis of an instrument’s fair value using an observable market price. If, in a subsequent period, the amount of the impairment loss decreases and the decrease can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment was recognized (such as an improvement in the debtor’s credit rating), the previously recognized impairment loss is reversed and recognized in the consolidated income statement. · Assets classified as available-for-sale In the case of equity securities classified as available-for-sale, a significant or prolonged decline inat the fair value of an investment in an equity instrument below of its cost is also objectivean evidence of impairment.Determining what is considered a “significant” or “prolonged” decline requires judgment. For this judgment we assess, among other factors, the historical changes in the equity prices, the duration and proportion in which the fair value of the investment is lower than its cost andas well as the financial health and short-term business prospects of the business for the investee, including factors such as: industry and segment performance, changes in technology and operating and operating/financial cash flows.If there is any of this evidence ofthe impairment ofevidences is observed for available-for-sale financial assets, the cumulative loss—measured as the difference between the acquisition cost and the current fair value, less any impairment loss on the financial asset previously recorded in profit or loss—is reclassified from shareholders' equity and recognized in the income statement. to profit or loss.Impairment losses recognized in the income statement as available-for-sale instruments are not reversed through the income statement.reversed. CSN tested for impairment its available-for-sale investment in Usiminas shares, (seesee note 13).13 – Financial Instruments. iii) Financial liabilities Financial liabilities are classified into the following categories: measuredcategories “measured at fair value through profit or lossloss” and other“other financial liabilities.liabilities”. Management determines the classification of its financial liabilities at the time of initial recognition. · Financial liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss Financial liabilities measured at fair value through profit or loss are financial liabilities held for trading or designated as at fair value through profit or loss. Derivatives are also classified as trading securities, and thereby are classified so, unless they have been designated as effective hedging instruments. F-20
· Other financial liabilities Other financial liabilities are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. The Company holds the following non-derivative financial liabilities: borrowings, financing and debentures andas well as trade payables. FS-21
· Offsetting of financial instruments Financial assets and financial liabilities are offset and the net amount is reported in the balance sheet when there is a legally enforceable right to set off the recognized amounts andas well as the intention to either settle them on a net basis or to realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously. iv) Derivative instruments and hedging activities · Derivatives measured at fair value through profit or loss Derivatives are initially recognized at fair value on the date when a derivative contract is entered, thereafter they are subsequently measured at their fair value and any changes are recognized as “Finance income (costs)” in the income statement. Certain derivative·Cash flow Hedge activities
The Company adopts hedge accounting and designates certain financial liabilities as a hedging instrument of a foreign exchange risk associated to the cash flows from forecast, highly probable exports (cash flow hedges). At the inception of the transaction, the Company documents the relationships between the hedging instruments do not qualifyand the hedged items, as well as its risk management objectives and strategy for undertaking hedging transactions. The Company also documents its assessment, both at the inception of the hedge accounting. Changesand on an ongoing basis, of whether the hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged items. The effective portion of the changes in the fair value of any of these derivative instrumentsfinancial liabilities designated and qualifying as cash flow hedge is recognized on equity, in line item "Hedge accounting”. Any gain or loss related to the ineffective portion is recognized immediately in profit or loss. The amounts accumulated in equity are immediately recognized inrealized at the income statement under “Otherin the periods when the forecast exports affect profit or loss. When a hedging instrument expires, is settled in advance or the hedging relationship no longer meets the hedge accounting criteria, or even when Management decides to discontinue hedge accounting, all cumulative gains (losses), net”or losses recorded in equity at the time remain recognized in equity. When the forecast transaction is completed, the gain or loss is reclassified to profit or loss. When a forecast transaction is no longer expected to take place, the cumulative gain or loss previously recognized in shareholders’ equity is immediately transferred to the income statement, in line item “Finance income (costs)”. The movements in the hedge amounts designated as exporting cash flow hedges are stated in note 13. ·Even though the Company uses derivatives for hedging purposes, it does not applyNet investment hedge accounting.activities ·ForeignFor net investment hedge, the Company designates part of its financial liabilities as hedging instruments of its overseas investments with functional currencies other than the Group’s functional currency, according to IAS 39. Such relationship occurs since the maturity of the financial liabilities is related to the exchange gains or losses on foreign operationsvariation of the investments in the amounts required for the effective relationship.
GainsAt the inception of the hedge relationship, the Company documents the relationship between the hedging instrument and lossesthe hedged item, along with its risk management objectives and its strategy for undertaking out various hedgetransactions. Furthermore, at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, the Company documents whether the hedging instrument is highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values of the hedged item.
F-21
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of financial liabilities that are designated and qualify as a net investment hedge is recognized in equity in line item “Hedge Accounting”. The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognized in finance income (costs), when applicable. If at some point of the hedging relationship the balance of the debt is higher than the balance of the investment, the exchange variation on the excess debt will be reclassified to the statement of profit or loss as a finance income/cost (ineffectiveness of the hedge). The amounts accumulated in shareholders' equity are includedwill be realized in the income statement whenof profit or loss upon disposal or partial disposal of the foreign operation is partially disposed of or sold.operation. The changes in the amounts of hedge denominated as Net investment hedge are shown in note 13.
(w)2.w) Segment information
An operating segment is a component of the Group committed to the business activities from which it can obtain revenues and incur expenses, including revenues and expenses related to transactions with any other components of the Group. All the operating results of operating segments are reviewed regularly by the Executive Officers of CSN to makeenable decisions regarding fundsresources to be allocated to the segment and assessment of its performance, and for which there isperformance. The Company maintains distinct financial information available (see Note 26).for the distinct segments. (x)2.x) Government grants
Government grants are not recognized until there is reasonable assurance that the Company will comply withto the conditions attaching to them and assurance that the grants will be received, whenso then they will be recognized in profit or loss on a systematic basis over the periods in which the Company recognizes as expenses the related costs that the grants are intended to compensate. The Company has state tax incentives in the North and Northeast regions, thatwhich are recognized in profit or loss as a reduction of the corresponding costs, expenses and taxes.
(y)2.y) New standards and interpretations issued and not yet adopted
The following standards, amendments to standards and IFRS interpretations issued by the IASB are not yet effective and were not early adopted by the CompanyGroup for the year ended December 31, 2012:2015: Standard | Description | Effective date | Amendment to
IAS 116 and IAS 38 | Presentation of Items of Other Comprehensive IncomeProperty, Plant and Equipment andIntangible Assets. Groups – in other comprehensive incomeMay 2014 these accounting standards were revised to clarify that the items that couldrevenue method will no longer be reclassified to profitpermitted for depreciation or loss in the income statement for the year.amortization purposes.
| | January 1, 2013
| Amendment to IAS 19
| Employee Benefits. Eliminates the corridor approach (applied by the Company in previous years) for recognition of actuarial gains or losses and requires that finance costs be calculated on a net funding basis. Simplifies the presentation of changes in assets and liabilities of defined benefit plans and expands the disclosure requirements.
| January 1, 2013
|
FS-22
|
| 2016 | IFRS 10 and IAS 28 | Consolidated Financial Statements. Defines principles and requirements for the preparation and presentation of consolidated financial statements when an entity controls one or more other entities. Establishes the concept of control as the basis for consolidation and sets out how to apply the principle of control to identify whether an investor controls an investee and therefore must consolidate the investee. | January 1, 2013
| IFRS 11
| Joint Arrangements. Establishes principles for disclosure of financial statements of entities that are parties of joint agreements. There are two types of joint arrangement: joint operations and joint ventures. Joint operations arise where a joint operator has rights to the assets and obligations relating to the arrangement and hence accounts for its interest in assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Joint ventures arise where the joint operator has rights to the net assets of the arrangement and hence equity accounts for its interest. Proportionate consolidation of joint ventures is no longer allowed.
| January 1, 2013
| IFRS 12
| Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities. Consolidates all the requirements of disclosures that an entity should carry out when participating in one or more entities, including joint arrangements, associates, special purpose vehicles and other off balance sheet vehicles.
| January 1, 2013
| IFRS 13
| Fair Value Measurement. Provides a more precise definition of fair value, explains how to calculate it (one single source of measurement), and determines what must be disclosed. The requirements do not extend the use of fair value accounting but provide guidance on how it should be applied where its use is already required or permitted by other standards.
| January 1, 2013
| Amendment to IAS 7
| Disclosures – Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.Establishes disclosure requirements for compensation agreements of financial assets and liabilities.
| January 1, 2013
| IFRS 27
(revised in 2011)
| Separate Financial Statements. Includes other considerations on separate financial statements and the control provisions of IAS 27 that have been included in the new IFRS 10.
| January 1, 2013
| IAS 28
(revised in 2011)
| Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures.Ventures Establishes– in September 2014 a revision was issued proposing that the gain or loss resulting from the sale or contribution of a subsidiary that does not constitute a business as defined in IFRS 3 to an investor’s subsidiary or joint venture should only be recognized to the extent of the unrelated investors' interests in the subsidiary or joint venture. | 2016 | IFRS 7 | Financial Instruments: Disclosures – in September 2014 the IASB revised IFRS 7 to provide guidance to clarify whether a servicing contract is continuing involvement and that the additional disclosure requirements are not specific for joint ventures and associates accounted for under the equity method following the issue of interim reporting periods. | 2016 | IFRS 11.9 | January 1, 2013
| IFRIC 20
| Stripping Costs in the Production Phase of a Surface Mine. IFRIC 20 includes clarifications on the recognition of stripping costs in the production phase of a surface mine. Pursuant to IFRIC 20, mining entities that present IFRS financial statements are required to derecognize existing stripping assets to retained earnings if such assets cannot be attributed to an identifiable component of a mineral deposit.
| January 1, 2013
| IAS 32
| Financial Instruments: Presentation"on the offsetting of assets and liabilities. Provides additional clarifications to the application guidance in IAS 32 on the requirement to set off financial assets and financial liabilities in the balance sheet.
| January 1, 2014
| IFRS 9
| Financial Instruments. IFRS 9 retains, but simplifies the mixedcombined measurement model and establishes two primarymain measurement categories forof financial assets: amortized cost and fair value. The classification basis for classification depends on the entity’s business model and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial asset. Theasset's contractual cash flow. IFRS 9 retains most of IAS 39 requirements for financialliabilities. The main change refers to those cases where thefair value of thefinancialliabilities must be segregated so that the fair value portion related to the entity’s credit risk is recognized in “Other comprehensive income” and not in profit or loss for the period. The guidance on IAS 39 on the impairment of financial assets and on hedge accounting continues to apply. The amendment postpones the effective date from 2013 to 2015. It also eliminates the requirement for restatement of comparative information and requires additional disclosures on the transition to is still applicable. | 2018 | IFRS 9.11 | January 1, 2015The amendments to IFRS 11 provide guidance on how to account for the acquisition of a joint operation that constitutes a business as defined in IFRS 3 for a business combination. The amendments also make it clear that the equity interest previously held in a joint operation is not re-measured on the acquisition of an additional equity interest in the same joint operation for as long as joint control is retained.
| 2016 | IFRS15 | Revenue from Contracts with Customers.This new standard introduces the principles that an entity will apply to determine the revenue measurement and when such revenue shall be recognized. IFRS15 replaces IAS 11Construction Contracts, IAS 18Revenue, and related interpretations. | 2018 | IFRS16 | Defines the principles for recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases. IFRS 16 replaces IAS17 - Leases and related interpretations. | 2019 |
FS-23F-22
It is expectedThere are no other standards, amendments to standards and interpretations not yet effective that some of these new standards willthe Group expects to have a material impact on the Group’s financial statements in 2013 and 2015, such as the IFRS 10, IFRS 11 and IFRS 12, which can affect the recognition and disclosure of the investments in entities currently consolidated and/or proportionately consolidated by the Company, IFRIC 20 Shipping Costs in the Production Phase of a Surface Mine can affect the recognition of stripping costs in non-current assets, and IFRS 9 can change the classification and measurement of the Group’s financial assets. The impact of adopting these standards has not yet been measured.
As for the other new and revised standards listed in the table above, the Company estimates that their adoption will not have material impacts on its financial statements.
3.2.a.a) Restatement of accounting balancesBUSINESS COMBINATION
·Companhia Brasileira de Latas (“CBL”)
On July 12, 2011, CSN conducted, through its wholly owned subsidiary “Prada”, a capital increase in Companhia Brasileira de Latas (“CBL”) through the capitalization of receivables. As a result, the Company became the holder of CBL’s control, with an equity interest equivalent to 59.17% of its voting capital, represented by 784,055,451 common shares (“Acquisition”).
The acquisition of CBL’s control will generate operating and administrative synergies that will result in a decrease in production costs, logistics costs and administrative costs.
As mentioned in note 2(i), the acquisition method was used to account for identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and non-controlling interests. Non-controlling interests in CBL equivalent to 40.83% were proportionately determined, based on the fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed.Some of the non-controlling shareholders are in the corporate structure of CSN’s parent group.
The purchase price of R$43,316 was allocated between identified assets acquired and liabilities assumed, measured at fair value. The asset and liability identification process considered the intangible assets that were not recognized in the acquirees’ books. The transaction costs are represented by consulting services and lawyers’ fees totaling R$485, which have been allocated to profit or loss as incurred.
The tables below showCompany reclassified in 2014 the allocationbalances of identifiable assets acquiredforfaiting transactions and liabilities assumed recognizeddrawee risk with commercial suppliers, originally presented in balance sheet as line item trade payables, to loans and financing, as follows: a) Balance Sheet at the acquisition date, the purchase price considered on the acquisition of CBL’s control,December 31, 2014 and the calculation of the resulting goodwill.
December 31, 2013
| | | | | Consolidated | | | | | | 12/31/2014 | | Published balances | | Reclassifications | | Restated balances | | | | | | | Total Assets | 49,767,100 | | | | 49,767,100 | | | | | | | Trade payables | 1,638,505 | | (470,679) | | 1,167,826 | Borrowings and financing | 29,883,379 | | 470,679 | | 30,354,058 | Other liabilities | 12,510,241 | | | | 12,510,241 | Total Liabilities | 44,032,125 | | | | 44,032,125 | | | | | | | Total equity | 5,734,975 | | | | 5,734,975 |
FS-24
F-23
| | Carrying amounts | | Fair value adjustments | | Total fair value | Assets acquired and liabilities assumed | | | | Current assets | | 62,182 | | (7,465) | | 54,717 | Non-current assets (*) | | 44,718 | | 89,449 | | 134,167 | Current liabilities | | (144,225) | | 10,522 | | (133,703) | Non-current liabilities (**) | | (567,469) | | 351,035 | | (216,434) | Total assets acquired and liabilities assumed | | (604,794) | | 443,541 | | (161,253) | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Consolidated | | | | | | | 12/31/2013 | | | Published balances | | Reclassifications | | Restated balances | Total Assets | | 50,402,539 | | | | 50,402,539 | | | | | | | | Trade payables | | 1,102,037 | | (42,265) | | 1,059,772 | Borrowings and financing | | 27,746,430 | | 42,265 | | 27,788,695 | Other liabilities | | 13,485,013 | | | | 13,485,013 | Total Liabilities | | 42,333,480 | | | | 42,333,480 | | | | | | | | Total equity | | 8,069,059 | | | | 8,069,059 |
(*) Comprising mainly ·Forfaiting Trough out the fair value adjustmentfinancial years 2014 and 2015 the Company purchased raw materials from its suppliers located abroad through a foreign trade operation called Forfaiting, in which the financial institution makes the payment in cash to property, plantexporter by the net values of the securities (discount rate and equipment amountingother possible expenses already deducted), allowing the Company to R$90,572. Total fair valuefinance imported goods by an yearly interest rate from 1.25% to 3.28%, maturing in 12 months. As of property, plant and equipment was measured31 December, 2015, this liability amounted to R$ 288,772 (R$ 414,442 at R$123,518 (see note 10)December 31, 2014). (*·*Drawee risk) Comprising mainly
During the fair value adjustmentfinancial years 2014 and 2015 the Company carried out transactions denominated drawee risk, the transaction occurs when the financial institution engaged by the Company anticipates to payables to CSN amountingsuppliers the debt securities, so then subsequently receives from the Company on the maturity date those anticipated values . As of 31 December, 2015, this liability amounted to R$388,640.84,063 (R$56,237 at December 31, 2014). b) Statements of cash flows at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 | | | | | Consolidated | | | | | | 12/31/2014 | | Published balances | | Reclassifications | | Restated balances | | | | | | | Cash generated by operating activities | | | | | | Loss of the period | (105,218) | | | | (105,218) | Trade payables | 581,951 | | (362,598) | | 219,353 | Paid Interests | (2,742,876) | | (2,078) | | (2,744,954) | Others | 3,454,528 | | | | 3,454,528 | Net cash generated by operating activities | 1,188,385 | | (364,676) | | 823,709 | | | | | | | Cash used in investing activities | (1,657,743) | | | | (1,657,743) | | | | | | | Cash generated by financing activities | | | | | | Forfaiting funding / drawee risk | | | 641,430 | | 641,430 | Forfaiting amortization / drawee risk | | | (276,754) | | (276,754) | Others | (896,015) | | | | (896,015) | Net cash used in financing activities | (896,015) | | 364,676 | | (531,339) | | | | | | | Exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | 55,722 | | | | 55,722 | | | | | | | Decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (1,309,651) | | | | (1,309,651) |
F-24
| | | | | | Consolidated | | | | | | | 12/31/2013 | | | Published balances | | Reclassifications | | Restated balances | Cash generated by operating activities | | | | | | | Loss of the period | | 509,025 | | | | 509,025 | Trade payables | | (841,157) | | 538,094 | | (303,063) | Paid Interests | | (2,376,537) | | (13,117) | | (2,389,654) | Others | | 4,906,748 | | | | 4,906,748 | Net cash generated by operating activities | | 2,198,079 | | 524,977 | | 2,723,056 | | | | | | | | Cash used in investing activities | | (2,245,806) | | | | (2,245,806) | | | | | | | | Cash generated by financing activities | | | | | | | Forfaiting funding / drawee risk | | | | 62,592 | | 62,592 | Forfaiting amortization / drawee risk | | | | (587,569) | | (587,569) | Others | | (1,881,419) | | | | (1,881,419) | Net cash used in financing activities | | (1,881,419) | | (524,977) | | (2,406,396) | | | | | | | | Exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | | 32,997 | | | | 32,997 | | | | | | | | Decrease in cash and cash equivalents | | (1,896,149) | | | | (1,896,149) |
c) Statement of income and statement of comprehensive income on December 31, 2014 and 2013 The Company has not presented the others statements as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 since the changes in those tables were not material. 3.BUSINESS COMBINATION -Acquisition of control of Nacional Minérios S.A. (Namisa)
3.1 Object of transaction On December 11, 2014, the Board of Directors of CSN approved the establishment of a strategic alliance with an Asian Consortium comprised by the companies ITOCHU Corporation, JFE Steel Corporation, POSCO, Ltd., Kobe Steel Ltd., Nisshin Steel Co, Ltd. and China Steel Corp. (“Asian Consortium”). The fairtransaction consisted of a business combination through which the Asian Consortium contributed its equity interest of Namisa (40%) into Congonhas Minérios S.A. (“Congonhas Minérios”), a mining subsidiary of CSN. After the corporate restructuring, Congonhas Minérios became the holder of the commercial establishment related to CSN’s iron ore mine Casa de Pedra, CSN’s equity interest of Namisa (60%), 8,63% direct interest in MRS, as well as the right to manage and operate the solid bulk terminal of TECAR in Itaguaí Port (“TECAR”). The transaction was concluded by the signing of a shareholders agreement by the shareholders of Congonhas Minérios, on November 30, 2015. The following steps were carried out in order to conclude the transaction: ·Payment of dividends by Namisa before closing of the transaction, amounting to US$1.4 billion (equivalent to R$5.4 billion); ·Restructuring of Congonhas Minérios through the contribution, by CSN, of the assets and liabilities related to Casa de Pedra, the rights to operate TECAR, 60% of Namisa’s shares, 8.63% of MRS’ shares, and US$850 million in debt (equivalent to R$3,370 million, as presented in note 9.b); ·Acquisition, by Congonhas Minérios, of 40% of the Namisa shares held by the Asian Consortium, resulting in the incorporation of Namisa by Congonhas Minérios; ·Signing of a shareholders agreement (“Shareholders’ Agreement”) by the shareholders of Congonhas Minérios; ·Payment by CSN of US$680 million relating to the acquisition of 4% of the shares held by the Asian Consortium in Congonhas Minérios and additional US$ 27 million relating to the acquisition of 0.16% of the shares held by the Asian F-25
Consortium in Congonhas Minérios, amounting to US$ 707 million (equivalent to R$2.7 billion); ·Settlement of the pre-existing agreements with Namisa for supply of high-silicon and low-silicon content ROM (Run of Mine), port services and ore beneficiation. The following charts show the corporate structure before and after the transaction: Considering the position of Congonhas Minérios’ assets, the contributions made by the Asian Consortium in the transaction, as well as adjustments resulting from the negotiations between the parties and adjustments of debt, cash and working capital, CSN and the Asian Consortium held, respectively, equity stakes of 87.52% and 12.48% in the capital stock of Congonhas Minérios upon conclusion of the transaction. The transaction also includes an earn-out mechanism by which, in the event of a qualified liquidity event occurred under certain valuation parameters and within a defined time period after the closing of the transaction, the Asian Consortium’s equity interest in Congonhas Minérios could be diluted, at CSN´s sole discretion, from 12.48% to 8.71%. This mechanism was considered as a contingent asset and no related value adjustments madewas accounted thereto. Part of the iron ore produced by Congonhas Minérios will be sold to the members of the Asian Consortium and to CSN. Such rights are reflected in long-term supply agreements entered into on November 30, 2015, which terms were negotiated on usual market conditions. CSN also ensured the use of TECAR for import of raw materials through a long-term agreement. 3.2 Application of IFRS3 to the transaction Prior to the transaction, Namisa was managed by means of a shareholders agreement, through which the Asian Consortium had sufficient vetoes that grant it substantial management rights over the operations. With respect to accounting, Namisa was classified as a joint venture within the scope of IFRS 10 and 11. CSN recorded its 60% equity interest in Namisa according to the equity method. As mentioned above, CSN carried out a corporate restructuring involving the transfer of its mining operations, rights to operate the port terminal TECAR and equity interests in Namisa and MRS to Congonhas Minérios. This step of the transaction was carried out based on the corporate balance sheet to prepare the opening balance sheet were adjusted after the completionbook value of the valuation reportassets, since there was no change control over the assets and equity stakes transferred. Upon conclusion of the corporate restructuring, Congonhas Minérios became the controlled company of CSN that concentrates the group’s mining businesses. As a result of the transaction, Namisa became fully controlled by Congonhas Minérios. The Asian Consortium holds only protective vetoes in December 2011.relation to the assets resulting from the business combination, usual in this type of transaction. F-26
Accordingly, since there has been alteration of control over Namisa’s assets, IFRS3 should be applied. Under the parameters of such accounting standards, the acquisition date for purposes of accounting records was November 30, 2015 and the acquirer considered for transaction purposes was Congonhas Minérios. Namisa was the acquiree. 3.3 Application of the acquisition method Under IFRS3, the acquisition method shall be applied for recording the transaction. The method consists of the following: a) determining the purchase price; b) recognizing the amount of the goodwill based on expectations for future profitability; and c) recognizing a gain or loss on pre-existing relations that should be settled with the business combination. These three steps are applicable to the acquisition of control over Namisa, and they are detailed as follows. a) Determination of the purchase price According to IFRS3, the purchase price is determined by the sum of the transferred assets, liabilities incurred, equity interests issued, non-controlling equity interests and the fair value of any equity interest held prior to the transaction. The following table summarizes the price considered for accounting purposes: Goodwill arising on acquisitionItem
| | | Comment | | R$ million | | Ref. | (-) Book value of CBLAssets transferred
| | (604,794)A payment in the amount of USD707MM is being carried out in the transaction.
| | 2,727 | | (i) | (+) Fair value adjustment of assets acquired and liabilitiesLiabilities assumed
| | 443,541Refers to financial adjustment of working capital and debt.
| | 6 | | (i) | Equity interests issued | | Congonhas Minérios issued shares that were delivered to the Asian Consortium. | | 2,619 | | (ii) | Fair value of the equity interest held by the acquiring company in the company acquired immediately prior to the combination | | Congonhas Minérios held 60% of the Namisa shares prior to the business combination and appraised such equity interest at fair value. | | 8,023 | | (iii) | (=) TotalPurchase price considered for the business combination
| | 13,375 | | |
i. Assets transferred and liabilities assumed Subsequent to the capital increase, the transaction included a payment made for acquisition of 4.16% of Congonhas Minérios’ shares held by the Asian Consortium in the amount of US$707 million, equivalent to R$2,727 as of November 30, 2015 and a liability amounting to R$6 to be paid along 2016. Even though such payment was carried out by CSN for the acquisition of Congonhas Minérios shares, its economic effect was recorded at Congonhas Minérios as an integral part of the consideration received due to the control acquisition over Namisa, according to the guidelines provided by IFRS3. ii. Equity interests issued – Shares in capital stock of Congonhas Minérios Congonhas Minérios performed the primary issue of shares to the Asian Consortium representing 12.48% of its total capital. Pursuant to IFRS3, such shares were appraised at fair value as of the acquisition date. Such appraisal was performed using the discounted cash flow method, considering the business plans approved by the shareholders of Congonhas Minérios. The main premises of such appraisal and the results thereof are described in the table below: F-27
remises | | Figures | Volumes of iron ore | | 60Mt/year over the long-term | Prices - Platts CFR China 62% Fe | | Intervals from US$56 to US$75 | Discount rate | | Nominal WACC of 13.91% | Fair value as of Nov. 30, 2015 (equity value) | | R$20,988 million | Percentage of shares held by the Asian Consortium after acquisition of the 4.16% equity interest | | 12.48% | Fair value attributed to the shares issued | | R$2,619 million |
The fair value of Congonhas Minérios was calculated by independent appraisers who issued an appraisal report.
iii. 60% equity interest in Namisa held prior to the acquisition
Congonhas Minérios held 60% of Namisa’s shares immediately prior to the transaction regarding the acquisition of control be concluded. Such shares were appraised under the equity method. According to item 41 of IFRS3, such shares are part of the consideration transferred and should be measured at their fair value as of the acquisition date. A gain or loss resulting from the difference between the fair value and the carrying amount recorded immediately prior to the acquisition should be recognized in profit or loss for the year. The appraisal of the fair value of Namisa was conducted according to the discounted cash flow method, considering the business plans in effect prior to the transaction and approved by the shareholders. The main premises of such appraisal and the results thereof are shown in the following table: Premises | | Figures | Volumes of iron ore | | 40Mt/year over the long term | Prices - Platts CFR China 62% Fe | | Intervals from US$56 to US$75 | Discount rate | | Nominal WACC of 14.36% | Fair value as of Nov. 30, 2015 (equity value) | | R$13,375 million | Fair value attributed to the 60% participation(a) | | R$8,023 million | Accounting Balances | | | Accounting balances considering the elimination of 60% due to the gain in the pre-existing relationship(b) | | | Carrying value as of Nov. 30, 2015 (60%) | | R$6,164 million | Elimination of 60% on the gain of a pre-existing relationship(1) | | R$933 million | | | 5,231 million | Gain on appraisal of the 60% stake at fair value (a–(b) | | R$2,792 million |
(1)According to item b(i) below, Namisa assets related to pre-existing contracts were adjusted to fair value at the acquisition date. The presentation of the gain in the valuation of the initial participation at fair value considers the elimination of 60% of the gain on the settlement of pre-existing relationship. The fair value of Congonhas Minérios was calculated by independent appraisers who issued an appraisal report. b) Goodwill on acquisition of control over Namisa
According to IFRS3, the acquirer shall recognize goodwill based on expectations for future profitability as of the acquisition date, measured by the amount at which the purchase price exceeds the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired (Purchase Price Allocation – PPA). The transaction generated goodwill of R$3,691 million, as per the table below: Item | | R$ million | | Ref. | Purchase price considered | | 13,375 | | Item (a) | Fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired | | 9,684 | | (i) | Goodwill based on expectations for future profitability (Note 11) | | 3,691 | | |
F-28
The goodwill based on expectations for future profitability is recorded under Intangible Assets and, since it does not have a definite useful life, it is not amortized, according to IAS 38. As from 2016, CSN will begin conducting impairment testing for this asset according to the requirements established by IAS 36.
(i) Fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired The following table shows the fair value allocation breakdown for 100% of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of November 30, 2015, calculated on the basis of reports prepared by independent appraisers: | | | | | | | | Consolidated | | | Carrying amounts | | Fair value adjustments | | (-) Write-off of goodwill recorded at Namisa | | Total fair value | Current assets | | 1,287,126 | | | | | | 1,287,126 | Cash and cash equivalents | | 783,256 | | | | | | 783,256 | Trade receivables | | 253,216 | | | | | | 253,216 | ROM and port advance - Congonhas | | 113,847 | | | | | | 113,847 | Other assets | | 136,807 | | | | | | 136,807 | Non-current assets | | 10,894,866 | | (189,319) | | (578,531) | | 10,127,016 | ROM and port advance - Congonhas | | 9,310,901 | | (1,554,121) | | | | 7,756,780 | Other assets | | 144,982 | | | | | | 144,982 | MRS shares - 10% | | 306,190 | | 480,610 | | | | 786,800 | Property, plant and equipment | | 550,825 | | 156,271 | | | | 707,096 | Intangíible assets | | 581,968 | | 727,921 | | (578,531) | | 731,358 | Total assets acquired | | 12,181,992 | | (189,319) | | (578,531) | | 11,414,142 | | | | | | | | | | Current liabilities | | 1,640,873 | | | | | | 1,640,873 | Borrowings and financing | | 4,680 | | | | | | 4,680 | Trade payables | | 29,037 | | | | | | 29,037 | Taxes payable | | 296,911 | | | | | | 296,911 | Dividends proposed (US$300 million) | | 1,156,800 | | | | | | 1,156,800 | Other payables | | 153,445 | | | | | | 153,445 | Non-current liabilities | | 266,224 | | 19,402 | | (196,700) | | 88,926 | Borrowings and financing | | 25,307 | | | | | | 25,307 | Provision for contingencies | | 7,486 | | | | | | 7,486 | Deferred taxes | | 215,783 | | 19,402 | | (196,700) | | 38,485 | Other payables | | 17,648 | | | | | | 17,648 | Total liabilities assumed | | 1,907,097 | | 19,402 | | (196,700) | | 1,729,799 | Total equity acquired | | 10,274,895 | | (208,721) | | (381,831) | | 9,684,343 |
According to IFRS3, the goodwill based on expectations for future profitability existing in the Namisa’s financial statements, as of the acquisition date, should be written off so that a new goodwill is recognized. The allocation of the fair value resulted in a loss in the total amount of R$208,721, distributed among the principal assets of Namisa. The following table shows the breakdown of the amounts allocated and a summary of the calculation methodology: F-29
Assets acquired | | Valuation method | Carrying amounts | | Fair value adjustment | | Total fair value | | | | Stake in MRS - 10% | | Entity's discounted cash flow considering the long-term business plan approved by shareholders. | 306,190 | | 480,610 | | 786,800 | Agreement for sale of ROM, provision of port services and ore processing between Namisa and Congonhas | | The contractual prices were compared with the market prices for ore and port services observed in comparable market purchase and sale transactions, adjusted by fluctuations in Plats projected over the agreement term. Based on the contractual volume, the difference between the result projected on the terms of the agreement and the market conditions generates goodwill. | 9,424,748 | | (1,554,121) | | 7,870,627 | Property, plant and equipment | | The amounts of property, plant and equipment were adjusted by the difference between the fair value of the PP&E and their respective net carrying amounts, as per the technical valuation conducted by an independent appraiser for the groups of assets represented by improvements, constructions, vehicles, furniture and fixtures. The useful lives follow the periods disclosed in Note10. | 550,825 | | 156,271 | | 707,096 | Mining rights (Mina do Engenho, Fernandinho, Cayman) | | The income approach was used based on the excess profitability methodology in multiple periods, due to the possibility of attributing the directly generated cash flow to the asset identified. Under this methodology, the amount of the mining rights is estimated based on their future profitability, discounting all costs and investments that would be necessary for extracting and processing the iron ore to their fair value. These rights will be amortized according to the depletion of the mines. | | | 726,390 | | 726,390 | relationship with supplier - contract purchase of iron ore - Itaminas | | For the fair value calculation of the contract with Itaminas we used the income approach, comparing the future cash flows generated by operation in two scenarios, through the contract and market conditions. | | | 1,531 | | 1,531 | Deferred income tax and social contribution on adjustments | | | | | (19,402) | | (19,402) | Total | | | 10,281,763 | | (208,721) | | 10,073,042 |
c) Settlement of pre-existing relationships between Congonhas Minérios and Namisa The IFRS3 determines that the increase or decrease in fair value, resulting from an advantage or disadvantage in the transaction between the acquirer and the acquiree, should be eliminated, with recognition of a gain or loss in the income statement of the year as of the transaction date. Such assets or relationships are referred as pre-existing relationship in the context of IFRS3. Congonhas Minérios and Namisa have a pre-existing relationship resulting from long-term agreements for the performance of port services, supply of ROM iron ore and processing of ore. With the business combination, such agreements were extinct, since CSN’s mining activities have now been centralized at Congonhas Minérios. According to IFRS3, due to the fact that the business combination between Congonhas Minérios and Namisa have settled the pre-existing agreements, Congonhas Minérios recognized a gain for the year, recorded in the profit/loss item of Other operating income and expenses, amounting to R$621,648, which is related to the participation of 40% held by the Asian Consortium in the preexisting contracts. 3.4 Effects reflected in CSN parent company - Transaction between partners recorded in equity As mentioned above, Congonhas Minérios was considered the acquirer for the application of IFRS3. As a result to the completion of the transaction, there was a change in CSN’s shareholding in Congonhas Minérios, which has not represented a loss of control in Congonhas Minérios by CSN. The Company’s participation decreased from 100% to 87.52%. According to IFRS10, this change should be classified as an equity transaction and the resulting gain or loss on the new value of the participation shall be recorded directly in net equity. Due to this percentage variation, a gain of R$1,945 million was recorded. The table below shows the reconciliation of this amount: F-30
Events | | R$ Million | Contribution to the capital of Congonhas Minérios by the Consortium - item (a) | | 2,619 | CSN Participation - 87,52% (1) | | 2,292 | Acquisition by CSN of 4.16% - item (a) | | 2,727 | Consortium participation - 12.48% (2) | | (340) | Other effects of the corporate reorganization (3) | | (161,253)
| | | | Purchase price
|
| 43,316
| | | | Goodwill arising on acquisition
|
| 204,569
| | | |
Goodwill arising on the acquisition comprises mainly the expected synergies generated by the business combination of packings segments of Companhia Metalúrgica Prada with CBL.
On December 31, 2012, the business combination with Companhia Brasileira de Latas, which took place on July 12, 2011, is under review of Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica, or CADE (Brazilian antitrust agency).
·Stahlwerk Thüringen GmbH (“SWT”) and Gallardo Sections
On January 31, 2012, through its wholly-owned subsidiary CSN Steel S.L., CSN completed the acquisition of all the shares (“Shares”) of the Spanish companies (a) Dankerena Guipúzcoa, S.L. (currently named CSN Steel Holdings 2, S.L.U.) and Grupo Alfonso Gallardo Thüringen, S.L.U. (currently named CSN Steel Holdings 1, S.L.U.), holding companies that together hold 100% of the capital of the German company Stahlwerk Thüringen GmbH (“SWT”), a producer of long steel located in Unterwellenborn, Germany, specialized in the production of shapes and with installed capacity of 1.1 million metric tons of steel/year; and (b) Gallardo Sections S.L.U. (currently named CSN Steel Comercializadora, S.L.U.), a trader of SWT products, all previously held by Grupo Alfonso Gallardo, S.L.U. (“AG Group”).
This acquisition helps CSN to strengthen its role in the long steel segment, by strengthening its portfolio of world class assets.
As mentioned in note 2(i), the acquisition method was used to account for identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
The purchase price of R$301,192 (€131,790), including the final adjustment to the purchase price of R$1,943 (€850), was allocated between identified assets acquired and liabilities assumed, measured at fair value. In the purchase priceidentification process, the Company considered the adjustments presented below and the starting point was the transaction amount of R$1,104,648 (€483,350)
FS-25
| | Amounts in R$(7)
| Transaction price
| | 1,104,648
| Net debt
| | (857,031)
| Provisions
| | (11,782)
| Tax credits
| | 13,498
| Working capital
| | 51,859
| (=) Purchase priceTotal gain on the transaction between shareholders (1 + 2 + 3)
| | 301,1921,945
| | | |
The transaction costs are represented by consulting services and lawyers’ fees totaling R$20,879, which have been included in3.5 Summary of the income statement, in general and administrative expenses, as incurred.accounting impacts
The tables below showfollowing table shows the allocationfull impact of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed recognized at the acquisition date, the purchase price consideredbusiness combination described above in the acquisition of SWTresults and Gallardo Sections, and the calculationequity of the resulting goodwill. The fair value adjustments made based on the corporate balance sheet to prepare the opening balance sheet were adjusted after the completion of the valuation report in December 2012.Company:
| | Carrying amounts | | Fair value adjustments | | Total fair value | Assets acquired | | | | Current assets (*) | | 400,387 | | | | 400,387 | Non-current assets (**) | | 191,956 | | 786,988 | | 978,944 | Current liabilities | | (262,203) | | | | (262,203) | Non-current liabilities (***) | | (842,526) | | (209,005) | | (1,051,531) | Total assets acquired | | (512,386) | | 577,983 | | 65,597 | | | | | | | |
Events | | R$ Million | | Accounting effect | | P&L | | Equity | Valuation Gain on 60% participation in Namisa, at fair value - item 3.3 (a) iii | | 2,792 | | 2,792 | Gain on settlement of preexisting relationships - item 3.3 ( c) | | 621 | | 621 | Gain on business combination before tax / social contribution (Note 24) | | 3,413 | | 3,413 | Income tax on the gain of the pre-existing relationship - item 3.3 (c) | | (528) | | (528) | Gain in transaction between shareholders - item 3.4 | | | | 1,945 | Total impact of the business combination | | 2,885 | | 4,830 | | | | | |
(*) Includes R$14,880 in cash and cash equivalents.
(**) Comprising mainly the fair value adjustment to property, plant and equipment amounting to R$392,817. Total fair value of property, plant and equipment was measured at R$582,478 (see note 10).
(***) Refers to the deferred income tax on the fair value adjustments.
Goodwill arising on acquisition
| | |
| |
| (+) Purchase price
| | 301,192
| (-) Fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed
| | 65,597
| (=) Goodwill arising on acquisition
|
| 235,595
| | | |
Goodwill arising on the acquisition was mainly based on expected future earnings, as described in note 11.
FS-26
4. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | | | | | Consolidated | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Current | | | | | | | Cash and cash equivalents | | | | | | | Cash and banks | 207,614 | | 101,360 | 434,014 | | 192,595 | | | | | | | | Short-term investments | | | | | | | In Brazil: | | | | | | | Government bonds | 862,299 | | 646,594 | | Government securities | | 165,520 | | 246,407 | Private securities | 902,159 | | 2,017,019 | 945,420 | | 486,730 | | 1,764,458 | | 2,663,613 | 1,110,940 | | 733,137 | Abroad: | | | | | | | Time deposits | 12,472,803 | | 12,652,420 | 6,316,098 | | 7,760,289 | Total short-term investments | 14,237,261 | | 15,316,033 | 7,427,038 | | 8,493,426 | Cash and cash equivalents | 14,444,875 | | 15,417,393 | 7,861,052 | | 8,686,021 | | | | | |
The funds available in the Company and subsidiariesGroup set up in Brazil are basically invested in investment funds, which are considered exclusivesclassified as exclusive and areits financial statements were consolidated withwithin CSN financial statements. The funds include repurchase agreements backed by governmentprivate and private bondspublic securities, with pre-fixed income, with immediate liquidity. Private securities are short-term investments in Bank Deposit Certificates (CDBs) and Debentures with yields pegged to the Interbank Deposit Certificate (CDI) fluctuation, and government securities are basically repurchase agreements backed by National Treasury Bills (LTNs)Notes and FinancialNational Treasury Bills (LFTs).Bills.The exclusive funds are managed by BTG Pactual Serviços Financeiros S.A. DTVM , BB Gestão de Recursos DVTM and Caixa Econômica Federal and their assets collateralize possible losses on investments and transactions carried out. Investments in funds were consolidated. In addition, aA significant part of the funds of the Company and its foreign subsidiaries is invested in time deposits within banks considered by the administration as leading banks, bearing fixed rates.
F-31
5. SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS
The Company has investments in Public and Private securities managed by its exclusive funds that have been qualified as a margin deposits for the forward dollar contracts traded at BM&F Bovespa in the period and detailed in note 13 (b). The carrying amount of these financial investments totaled R$ 763,599 on December 31, 2015. These investments have pre-fixed yield and immediate liquidity. 6.TRADE RECEIVABLES | | | | Consolidated | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Trade receivables | | | | | | | Third parties | | | | | | | Domestic market | 832,620 | | 895,517 | 772,617 | | 861,518 | Foreign market | 876,393 | | 701,807 | 818,562 | | 762,935 | | | 1,591,179 | | 1,624,453 | Allowance for doubtful debts | (111,532) | | (124,939) | (151,733) | | (127,223) | | 1,597,481 | | 1,472,385 | 1,439,446 | | 1,497,230 | Related parties (Note 18 - b and c) | 117,598 | | 86,612 | | | 1,715,079 | | 1,558,997 | | Related parties (Note 19 - b) | | 61,366 | | 153,737 | | | | | 1,500,812 | | 1,650,967 | Other receivables | | | | | | | Other receivables from related parties | 17,065 | | 1,537 | | Dividends receivable (Note 19 - b) (*) | | 27,817 | | 59,470 | Advances to employees | | 40,190 | | 32,743 | Other receivables | 62,422 | | 55,672 | 9,458 | | 9,876 | | 79,487 | | 57,209 | 77,465 | | 102,089 | | 1,794,566 | | 1,616,206 | 1,578,277 | | 1,753,056 | | | | | |
FS-27
The gross trade receivables balance(*) Refers mainly to dividends receivable from third parties is comprised as follows:Congonhas Minérios S.A. totaling R$694,080 to be paid on November 30, 2016.
| | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | Falling due | | 1,436,878 | | 1,359,540 | Overdue until 180 days | | 123,379 | | 89,766 | Overdue above 180 days | | 148,756 | | 148,018 | | | 1,709,013 | | 1,597,324 | | | | | |
In orderaccordance with Group’ internal sales policy the Group performs operations relating to meet the needs of some customers in the domestic market, related to the extension of the payment term for billing of steel, in common agreement with CSN’s internal commercial policy and maintenance of its very short-term receipts (up to 14 days), at the request of the customer, transactions are carried out for assignment of receivables without co-obligation negotiated between the customer and banks with common relationship, where CSN assigns the trade notes/bills that it issues to the banks with common relationship. Due to the characteristics of the transactions for assignment of receivables without co-obligation,in which, after assignment ofassigning the customer’s trade notes/bills and receipt ofreceiving the fundsamounts from the closing of each transaction closed, CSN settles the trade receivables and becomes entirely free of the credit risk on the transaction. This transaction totals R$224,718 232,275 as of December 31, 20122015 (R$262,367 264,411 as of December 31, 2011)2014), less the trade receivables.
The changesbreakdown of gross trade receivables from third parties is as follows: | | | | Consolidated | | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Current | | 1,049,033 | | 1,284,824 | Past-due up to 180 days | | 353,443 | | 236,843 | Past-due over 180 days | | 188,703 | | 102,786 | | | 1,591,179 | | 1,624,453 |
The movements in the Company’sGroup’s allowance for doubtful debts are as follows: | | | | Consolidated | | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Opening balance | | (127,223) | | (114,172) | Estimated losses | | (35,631) | | (25,305) | Recovery of receivables | | 11,121 | | 12,254 | Balance related to incorporation | | | | | Closing balance | | (151,733) | | (127,223) |
F-32
| | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | Opening balance | | (124,939) | | (117,402) | Allowance for losses on trade receivables | | (11,073) | | (20,005) | Recovery (reversal) of receivables | | 24,480 | | 12,468 | Closing balance | | (111,532) | | (124,939) | | | | | |
6.7. INVENTORIES
| 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | | | Consolidated | Finished products | 1,133,002 | | 997,128 | | Work in process | 668,152 | | 776,918 | | | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Finished goods | | 1,912,868 | | 1,270,182 | Work in progress | | 1,007,630 | | 858,811 | Raw materials | 563,533 | | 694,383 | 1,062,557 | | 1,006,620 | Storeroom supplies | 1,084,854 | | 981,086 | 962,078 | | 949,062 | Iron ore | 174,643 | | 215,399 | 95,461 | | 147,699 | Advances to suppliers | 55,068 | | 153,215 | 12,147 | | 2,329 | (-) Allowance for inventory losses | (99,227) | | (83,145) | | Provision for losses | | (111,427) | | (112,581) | | 3,580,025 | | 3,734,984 | 4,941,314 | | 4,122,122 | | | | | |
ChangesThe movements in the allowanceprovision for inventory losses are as follows:
| | | | | Consolidated | | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Opening balance | | (83,145) | | (64,115) | | (112,581) | | (102,185) | Allowance for obsolete or slow-moving inventories | | (16,082) | | (19,030) | | Provision for losses /reversals of slow-moving and obsolescence (Note 24) | | | 1,154 | | (10,396) | Closing balance | | (99,227) | | (83,145) | | (111,427) | | (112,581) | | | | | | |
As of December 31,2012, the Company has long-term iron ore inventories amounting to R$144,483, classified in other non-current assets (R$144,483 as of December 31,2011), as described in note7.
FS-28
7.8. OTHER CURRENT AND NON-CURRENT ASSETS
The groupgroups of other current and non-current assets is comprised as follows: | Current | | Non-current | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | Judicial deposits (Note 16) | | | | | 732,666 | | 954,711 | Credits with the PGFN (*) (Note 15) | | | | | 84,392 | | 806,103 | Recoverable taxes (**) | 569,486 | | 689,006 | | 310,542 | | 257,977 | Prepaid taxes | | | | | | | | Prepaid expenses | 44,332 | | 24,135 | | 100,728 | | 115,853 | Actuarial asset - related party | | | | | 93,546 | | | Unrealized gains on derivatives (Note 13 I) | 239,266 | | 55,115 | | 8,665 | | 376,344 | Guarantee margin on financial instruments (Note 13 V) | 435,161 | | 407,467 | | | | | Iron ore inventory (Note 6) | | | | | 144,483 | | 144,483 | Northeast Investment Fund - FINOR | | | | | 9,914 | | 47,754 | Trade receivables | | | | | 8,983 | | 10,043 | Receivable from related parties | | | | | 136,077 | | 115,549 | Other | 14,234 | | | | 18,060 | | 47,452 | | 1,302,479 | | 1,175,723 | | 1,648,056 | | 2,876,269 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Consolidated | | Current | Non-current | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Judicial deposits (Note 17) | | | | | 328,542 | | 288,804 | Credits with the PGFN(1) | | | | | 87,761 | | 81,792 | Recoverable taxes(2) | 996,679 | | 598,497 | | 445,926 | | 155,616 | Prepaid expenses | 119,456 | | 36,226 | | 28,119 | | 33,323 | Actuarial asset - related party (Note 19 b) | | | | | 114,433 | | 97,173 | Derivative financial instruments (Note 13 I) | 118,592 | | 174,611 | | | | | Exclusive fund quotas(3) | | | | | | | | Securities held for trading (Note 13 I) | 10,778 | | 13,798 | | | | | Iron ore inventory(4) | | | | | 144,499 | | 144,483 | Northeast Investment Fund – FINOR | | | | | 10,888 | | 8,452 | Other receivables (Note 13 I) | | | | | 6,877 | | 1,347 | Loans with related parties (Note 19 b) | | | 517,493 | | 373,214 | | 117,357 | Other receivables from related parties (Note 19 b) | 9,420 | | 15,780 | | 29,020 | | 7,037 | Other | 31,524 | | 17,898 | | 14,642 | | 12,036 | | 1,286,449 | | 1,374,303 | | 1,583,921 | | 947,420 |
(*) (1)Refers to the excess judicial deposit originated by the 2009 REFIS (Tax Debt Refinancing Program) as described in note 15..
(**) (2)Refers mainly to taxes on revenue (PIS/COFINS) and State VAT (ICMS) on the acquisition of fixed assets which will be recovered over a 48-month period,recoverable and income tax and social contribution for offset. The variation in the year stems from recognition of extemporaneous credits in the year 2015. The Company conducted an assessment of their credits and expects to recover in the coming periods.
(3)Refers to transactions with derivatives managed by the exclusive funds. (4)Long-term iron ore inventories that will be used after the construction of the processing plant, which will produce pellet feed, expected to start operating in the second half of 2017, splited to Congonhas Minérios from the drop down of mining assets (refer to note 3). F-33
8.9. INCOME TAX AND SOCIAL CONTRIBUTIONINVESTMENTS
·Reduce of financial leverage
With the primary goal of reducing financial leverage, the Company´s Management is focused on a plan of disposal of assets and believes that a portion of these assets will be sold within 12 months as from December 31, 2015; however, it is not possible to confirm that the sale is highly probable for any of the considered assets, within these 12 months period. The Company considers several sales scenarios that vary according to different macroeconomic and operating assumptions. In this context, the Company did not segregate and not reclassified these assets in the financial statements as discontinued operations in accordance with the IFRS 5.
9.a) Direct equity interests in joint ventures, associates and other investments
| | Classification | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Joint-venture e Joint-operation | | | | | | | Nacional Minérios S.A. | | (*) | | | | 9,471,026 | MRS Logística S.A. | | Joint Venture | | 556,505 | | 776,691 | CBSI - Companhia Brasileira de Serviços de Infraestrutura | | Joint Venture | | 502 | | 3,482 | Transnordestina Logística S.A. | | Joint Venture | | 1,271,045 | | 1,296,936 | Fair Value alocated to TLSA due to control loss | | Joint Venture | | 659,105 | | 659,105 | Arvedi Metalfer do Brasil | | Associate | | 1,039 | | 15,672 | Other investments | | | | | | | Usiminas | | Equity Instrument at fair value classified as avalable for sale | | 450,073 | | 1,409,440 | Panatlântica | | Equity Instrument at fair value classified as avalable for sale | | 21,601 | | 31,589 | Others | | | | | | 1,512 | | | | | 2,959,870 | | 13,665,453 |
(*) In the new structure, Congonhas Minérios S.A. stared to control Namisa trough out a business combination transaction, the details are described in note 3. (a)Income tax and social contribution recognized in profit or loss:
The income tax and social contribution recognized in profit or loss for the year are as follows:
| 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | Income tax and social contribution income/(expenses) | | | | Current | (205,022) | | (136,427) | Deferred | 1,075,156 | | 52,542 | | 870,134 | | (83,885) | | | | |
FS-29F-34
The reconciliation9.b) Merger of Companysubsidiaries and consolidated income taxdivision of assets
In 2015 there were controlled incorporation of operations, drop down of business establishment, and social contribution expenses and income anddivision of assets that impacted the result from applying the effective rate on profit before income tax (IRPJ) and social contribution (CSLL) arefinancial statements as follows: | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | Profit before income tax and social contribution | (1,350,708) | | 3,751,119 | Tax rate | 34% | | 34% | Income tax and social contribution at combined statutory rate | 459,241 | | (1,275,380) | Adjustment to reflect effective rate: | | | | Income subject to special tax rates or untaxed | 386,182 | | 1,279,431 | Tax incentives | 2,115 | | 73,134 | Adjustments arising from Law 11,941 and MP 470 installment plans | 39,256 | | (16,060) | Sale of nondeductible securities | | | (189,946) | Tax loss carryforwards without recognizing deferred taxes | (42,683) | | | Income tax and social contribution credits | | | 44,434 | Other permanent deductions (additions) | 26,023 | | 502 | Income tax and social contribution in profit (loss) for the year | 870,134 | | (83,885) | Effective rate | -64% | | 2% |
| | CSN Cimentos (1) | | Casa de Pedra e Tecar (2) | | Namisa (3) | | Mineração Nacional (4) | | 05/01/2015 | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2015 | Cash and equivalents | | 129,745 | | | | 213,355 | | | Trade receivables | | 433,542 | | 650,716 | | 193,612 | | | Inventories | | 21,814 | | 497,357 | | 61,513 | | 19,026 | Dividends receivable | | | | | | 1,344,829 | | | Deferred tax | | 29,042 | | 73,436 | | | | | Advance to suppliers | | | | 14,470 | | 9,414,947 | | | Other current and non-current assets | | 21,452 | | 229,841 | | 173,273 | | 7,838 | Investments | | 93,564 | | 6,173,113 | | 344,698 | | | Property, plant, equipment and intangible | | 397,570 | | 5,932,597 | | 1,091,498 | | 41,848 | Borrowings and financing | | | | (3,257,338) | | (1,257,299) | | | Advance to customers | | | | (9,414,946) | | | | | Trade payables | | (30,180) | | (323,995) | | (41,076) | | (541) | Proposed dividends | | | | | | (1,156,800) | | | Deferred tax | | | | | | (143,146) | | | Tax payable | | (10,625) | | (25,550) | | (141,959) | | | Other current and non-current liabilities | | (24,919) | | (392,978) | | (209,826) | | (9,133) | Net assets | | 1,061,005 | | 156,723 | | 9,887,619 | | 59,038 |
(b)Deferred income tax and social contribution:(1) Merger of subsidiary CSN Cimentos as mentioned in Note 9.d;
(2) Drop down of the assets Casa De Pedra, TECAR, 60% of the shares of Namisa and 8.63% of MRS shares from CSN's mining business to the subsidiary Congonhas Minérios, as mentioned in Note 3; (3) Merger of the subsidiary Namisa by Congonhas Minérios as mentioned in Note 3; (4) Spin-off of Namisa assets to National Minérios in addition of restructuring the Company´s mining activities mentioned in note 3. Furthermore, besides the book values of the spin-off mentioned above, fair value adjustments were assigned to mining rights amounting to R$427 million, R$282 net of income taxes (IR/CSLL).
9.c) Rollforward of investments balances in joint ventures, associates and other investments
| | | Consolidated | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Opening balance of investments | 13,665,453 | | 13,487,023 | Opening balance of loss provisions | | | | Investment balance of Namisa 11.30.15(1) | (10,160,981) | | | Capital increase/acquisition of shares(2) | 3,575 | | 10,279 | Capital reduction(3) | (466,758) | | | Dividends(4) | (54,464) | | 395,307 | Comprehensive income(5) | (967,447) | | (970,266) | Equity pickup(6) | 1,192,034 | | 743,119 | Drop down of MRS assets to Congonhas(7) | 786,800 | | | Others | 15 | | (9) | Closing balance of investments | 3,998,227 | | 13,665,453 | Balance of provision for investments with negative equity | | | | Total | 3,998,227 | | 13,665,453 |
(1)Refers to Namisa´s equity on November 2015, after the business combination events (dividends distribution, CSN Handel acquisition and transferring of mining assets to Congonhas Minérios S.A.), during which the company was not consolidated. Therefore, the carrying amounts presented herein differ from the amounts presented in note 3. (2) The deferred income taxvariation is due mainly by capital increase in Prada with capitalization of credits receivable from indirect subsidiaries Rimet and social contribution are calculated on income tax and social contribution loss carryforwards and related temporary differences betweenCBL amounting to R$331,869 as well as capital increase in the tax basesMineração Nacional, due to the drop down of assets and liabilities andfrom Nacional Minérios in the accounting balancesamount of the financial statements. They are presented at net amounts when related to a sole jurisdiction. | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | Deferred tax assets | | | | Income tax loss carryforwards | 818,705 | | 425,406 | Social contribution loss carryforwards | 242,606 | | 157,858 | Temporary differences | 1,311,190 | | 1,257,509 | - Provision for tax, social security, labor and civil risks | 269,803 | | 211,835 | - Allowance for asset impairment losses | 66,062 | | 60,930 | - Allowance for inventory losses | 50,295 | | 30,814 | - Allowance for gains/(losses) on financial instruments | 363,966 | | 253,985 | - Accrued pension and healthcare plan (actuarial liability) | 157,445 | | 144,360 | - Provision for interest on capital | | | 74 | - Accrued supplies and services | 66,997 | | 67,445 | - Allowance for doubtful debts | 30,761 | | 45,342 | - Goodwill on acquisitions | 62,042 | | 371,153 | - Unrealized foreign exchange (*) | 206,711 | | | - Other | 37,108 | | 71,571 | Non-current assets | 2,372,501 | | 1,840,773 | | | | | Deferred tax liabilities | | | | - Business combination | 225,965 | | 17,960 | - Other | 58,145 | | 19,891 | Non-current liabilities | 284,110 | | 37,851 | | | | |
R$ 59,038 (see note 9.b). (*)(3) In 2012,2015 it refers to capital reduction in the Company opted for taxing foreign exchangecompanies Nacional Minérios S.A. and Cia Metalic Nordeste. In 2014, refers to capital reduction in the subsidiaries CSN Steel, CSN Americas, CSN Metals, CSN Minerals and CSN Export.
(4) Dividend payments by Namisa in the amount of R$ 3,239,040 and declaration of dividends amounting to R$694,080, scheduled to be paid on a cash basis to calculate income tax and social contribution.November 30, 2016 (see Note 3); FS-30F-35
Some Group(5) Refers to the mark-to-market of investments classified as available for sale and translation to the reporting currency of the foreign investments (the functional currency of which is not the Brazilian reais) and actuarial gain/loss reflecting the investments measured by equity method.
(6) The table below shows the reconciliation of the equity in results of affiliated companies recognized tax creditsincluded on investment balance with the amount disclosed in the income taxstatement and social contribution loss carryforwards not subjectit is due to statutethe elimination of limitationsthe results of the CSN´s transactions with these companies: | | | Consolidated | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Equity in results of affiliated companies | | | | Nacional Minérios S.A. | 1,156,714 | | 673,060 | MRS Logística S.A. | 78,684 | | 102,476 | CBSI - Companhia Brasileira de Serviços de Infraestrutura | (2,979) | | 572 | Transnordestina | (31,137) | | (27,465) | Arvedi Metalfer do Brasil | (15,690) | | (5,524) | Others | 6,442 | | | | 1,192,034 | | 743,119 | Eliminations | | | | To cost of sales | (50,815) | | (45,812) | To net revenues | 2,805 | | 50,261 | To finance costs | | | (628,629) | To taxes | 16,324 | | 212,221 | Equity in results | 1,160,348 | | 331,160 |
9.d) In Joint ventures and joint operations financial information ·SEPETIBA TECON S.A. (“TECON”) The Container Terminal was created to exploit the terminal no 1 in Itaguaí Port, located in the State of Rio de Janeiro. The terminal is connected to the UPV by the Southeast railroad network. The Southeast railroad network is the contract object of the concession that has been granted to MRS Logística S. A. The range of services includes the move operation of cargo, storage of containers and steel products, general cargo, cleaning and maintenance. The Tecon concession was granted on September 3, 1998, this concession allows the exploitation of said terminal for 25 years renewable for the same period. When the concession expires, it will return to the Union as well as all the rights and privileges transferred to Tecon, along with the ownership of assets and those resulting from investments, declared reversible by the Federal Government for being necessary to the continuity of terminal´s operation. The reversible assets will be indemnified by the Federal Government at the residual value of cost, based on the historyaccounting records of profitability and expected future taxable profits determined in technical studies approved by Management. Since they are subject to significant factors that may change the projections for realization, the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets and projections are reviewed annually. These studies indicate the realization of these tax assets within the term stipulated by the mentioned instruction and the limit of 30% of the taxable profit.
The estimate of recovery of the deferred income tax and social contribution assets is as follows:
| | | Up to 1 year
| | 1,473,430
| From 1 to 2 years
| | 424,119
| From 2 to 3 years
| | 462,860
| From 3 to 5 years
| | 12,092
|
|
| 2,372,501
| | | |
Tecon after deducting depreciation. Certain Group·ESTANHO DE RONDÔNIA S.A. (“ERSA”)
Headquartered in the state of Rondônia, the subsidiary operates two units, which are based in the cities of Itapuã do Oeste and Ariquemes. In Itapuã do Oeste is extracted the cassiterite (tin ore) and in Ariquemes is located the casting operation, where the metallic tin is made, which is the raw material used in UPV for the production of tin plates. ·CIA. METALIC NORDESTE (“Metalic”) Headquartered in Maracanaú, State of Ceará, its corporate purpose is to manufacture metallic packaging destined basically to the beverage industry. Its production is mainly focused on the north and northeast Brazil market and the production excess is directed to foreign markets. The Company´s operational unit has two separate production lines: i) cans, its main raw material is steel coated with tin, provided by the parent company and; ii) metal covers, its main raw material is aluminum. F-36
·COMPANHIA METALÚRGICA PRADA (“Prada”) Metal packaging Prada operates in the field of steel packaging, producing what is best and safest in steel cans, buckets and aerosols. Its supply chain includes the chemical and food segments, providing packaging and printing services to leading companies have tax assetsin the market. On August 1, 2014 Prada subscribed 10.820.723.155 shares in its subsidiary Companhia Brasileira de Latas ("CBL") that were paid through the capitalization of credits arising from advances for future Capital Increase (AFAC), held by Prada and related CBL amounting to R$108,207. Due to the increase mentioned, Prada´s participation raised from 59.17% to 95.55% of total share capital of CBL. As of August 28, 2014 Prada acquired altogether the shares held by minority shareholders of CBL representing 4.45% of the share capital by the amount of $5. Nowadays Prada holds a 100% interest in the share capital CBL. CBL is also engaged in the manufacture of metal steel packaging for the food and chemical industry, supplying its products to leading companies in the market, thus acting in the same Prada´s business segment. Additionally, as of 2014 the Companhia de Embalagens (MMSA) has incorporated three metal packaging companies as follows: Empresa de Embalagens Metálicas (LBM Ltda.), Empresa de Embalagens Metálicas (MUD Ltda.) and Empresa de Embalagens Metálicas (MTM do Nordeste). On November 30, 2015, Prada has incorporated its subsidiary Rimet Empreendimentos Industriais e Comerciais. Distribution
Prada is a player in the market of processing and distribution regarding flat steel products, with a diversified product line. It provides coils, rolls, strips, blanks, metal sheets, profiles, tubes and tiles, among other products, to the most different industry segments - from automotive to construction. It is also specialized in providing service steel processing, meeting the demand of the all national companies. ·789,704 and R$259,933, related to income tax and social contribution loss carryforwards, for which no deferred taxes were set up, of which R$10,769expire in 2013, R$771in 2014, R$30,978in 2015, and R$50,225in 2025. The remaining tax assets refer to domestic companies and, therefore, are not subject to statute of limitations.CSN CIMENTOS S.A. (“CSN Cimentos”) The tax benefitEstablished in Volta Redonda, state of goodwillRio de Janeiro, the Company is engaged in the manufacture and sale of National Minérios S.A., which arosecement, using as its raw materials the blast furnace slag from the UPV steelwork. CSN Cimentos started its operations on May 14, 2009.
As of March 31, in order to optimize processes and maximize results, focusing on a single organizational structure of all commercial and administrative activities, the Directors of CSN proposed the merger of Big Jumpthe subsidiary CSN Cimentos SA. The CSN Cimentos SA. net assets amounted R$1,109,662 in July 2009, amounted to R$the mentioned date. At the extraordinary general meeting with the shareholders held on April 30, 2015, the merger of CSN Cimentos was approved, with effect from 1 May 2015, and as a result of the transaction, CSN Cimentos was extinguished and CSN assumed all its assets, rights and obligations. ·1,391,858. Up to December 31, 2012 a total amount of R$951,104 (R$672,732 up to 2011) had been realized, leaving a remaining amount of R$440,754, which will be realized through 2014. In2013, this realization will be R$278,372 and in 2014, the benefit will be R$162,382.CSN ENERGIA S.A. The undistributed profitsIts main objective is the distribution of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries have been investedexcess electric power generated by CSN and will continue to be investedCompanies, consortiums or other entities in their operations. These undistributed profits of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries amounted to R$which CSN holds an interest.
·8,111,394 as of December 31, 2012 (R$8,033,902 as of December 31, 2011).FTL - FERROVIA TRANSNORDESTINA LOGÍSTICA S.A. (“FTL”) (c)Income tax and social contribution recognized in shareholders' equity:
The income tax and social contribution recognized directly in shareholders' equity are as follows:
| 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | Income tax and social contribution | | | | Gain/(loss) on defined benefit pension plan | 66,155 | | 54,714 | Changes in the fair value on available-for-sale financial assets | (377,164) | | 241,484 | Exchange differences on translating foreign operations | (425,510) | | (425,510) | | (736,519) | | (129,312) | | | | |
(d)Tax incentives
The Company is granted by Income Tax incentives basedFTL was created on the legislationpurpose of incorporating the spun-off portion of TLSA, the Company holds the concession to operate the railway cargo transportation, the public service is provided in effect, such as: Worker Food Program,northeastern of Brazil, which includes the Rouanet Law (tax incentives relatedrailway between the towns of Sao Luis to cultural activities), Tax Incentives for Audiovisual Activities,Fortaleza, Recife Daredevil, Itabaiana Cabedelo, Paula Cavalcante Macau and Funds for the Rights of Children and Adolescents. As of December 31, 2012, these tax incentives total R$3,366 (R$1,914 as of December 31, 2011)Propriá Jorge Lins ("Network I").
FS-31F-37
As of April 2015, the CSN subscribed shares by capitalization of advances for future capital increase amounting R$ 45,071, therefore its participation in the share capital of the company increased from 88.41% to 89.79%.
·CONGONHAS MINÉRIOS S.A. (“CONGONHAS”) Headquartered in Congonhas, Minas Gerais, it is primarily engaged in the production, purchase and sale of iron ore. Congonhas commercializes its products mainly in the overseas market. As mentioned in note 3, from 30 November 2015, the Congonhas has centralized mining operations of CSN, including the establishments of the mine Casa de Pedra, the port TECAR and the participation of 18.63% in MRS. The participation of the CSN in this subsidiary is 87,52%. ·MINERAÇÃO NACIONAL S.A. Headquartered in Congonhas, Minas Gerais State, the Mineração Nacional is primarily engaged in the production and sale of iron ore. This subsidiary concentrates the assets of mining rights relating to mines Fernandinho, Cayman and Casa de Pedra transferred to this subsidiary in the business combination process described in note 3.
9.INVESTMENTS 9.e) Joint ventures and joint operations financial information
The number of shares, the balances of assets, liabilitiesthe balance sheets and shareholders' equity,income statements of joint venture and joint operation are presented as follows and refer to 100% of the amounts ofcompanies´ profit/loss: | | 11/30/2015 | | | | | | | | 12/31/2015 | | | | | | | | | | 12/31/2014 | | | Joint-Venture | | | | | | | | Joint-Operation | | Joint-Venture | | Joint-Operation | Equity interest (%) | | Nacional Minérios | | MRS Logística | | CBSI | | Transnordestina Logística | | Itá Energética | | CGPAR | | Nacional Minérios (*) | | MRS Logística | | CBSI | | Transnordestina Logística | | Itá Energética | | CGPAR | | | | 34.94% | | 50.00% | | 56.92% | | 48.75% | | 50.00% | | 60.00% | | 27.27% | | 50.00% | | 62.64% | | 48.75% | | 50.00% | Balance sheet | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Current assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Cash and cash equivalents | | 456,364 | | 671,475 | | 3,343 | | 75,977 | | 36,647 | | 10,621 | | 5,499,139 | | 266,905 | | 925 | | 511,586 | | 31,436 | | 27,253 | Advances to suppliers | | 115,693 | | 6,854 | | 289 | | | | 215 | | 81 | | 250,469 | | 13,994 | | 98 | | | | 364 | | 337 | Other current assets | | 364,468 | | 657,000 | | 22,726 | | 67,540 | | 17,137 | | 43,358 | | 309,054 | | 532,016 | | 30,164 | | 54,196 | | 15,859 | | 32,146 | Total current assets | | 936,525 | | 1,335,329 | | 26,358 | | 143,517 | | 53,999 | | 54,060 | | 6,058,662 | | 812,915 | | 31,187 | | 565,782 | | 47,659 | | 59,736 | Non-current assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Advances to suppliers | | 9,310,901 | | | | | | | | | | | | 9,236,170 | | | | | | | | | | | Other non-current assets | | 136,144 | | 533,897 | | 139 | | 280,718 | | 32,880 | | 13,087 | | 129,504 | | 503,849 | | 86 | | 253,307 | | 32,371 | | 85 | Investments, PP&E and intangible assets | | 1,399,713 | | 6,191,459 | | 4,689 | | 7,006,464 | | 534,569 | | 34,000 | | 1,431,643 | | 5,867,645 | | 6,083 | | 5,750,208 | | 568,883 | | 63,557 | Total non-current assets | | 10,846,758 | | 6,725,356 | | 4,828 | | 7,287,182 | | 567,449 | | 47,087 | | 10,797,317 | | 6,371,494 | | 6,169 | | 6,003,515 | | 601,254 | | 63,642 | Total Assets | | 11,783,283 | | 8,060,685 | | 31,186 | | 7,430,699 | | 621,448 | | 101,147 | | 16,855,979 | | 7,184,409 | | 37,356 | | 6,569,297 | | 648,913 | | 123,378 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Current liabilitiesPassivo circulante | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Borrowings and financing | | 4,680 | | 844,296 | | | | 167,112 | | | | 10,849 | | 368,818 | | 382,332 | | | | 187,331 | | | | 25,520 | Other current liabilities | | 1,635,993 | | 893,883 | | 28,794 | | 250,440 | | 33,667 | | 55,281 | | 429,345 | | 851,850 | | 27,718 | | 84,594 | | 29,986 | | 52,744 | Total current liabilities | | 1,640,673 | | 1,738,179 | | 28,794 | | 417,552 | | 33,667 | | 66,130 | | 798,163 | | 1,234,182 | | 27,718 | | 271,925 | | 29,986 | | 78,264 | Non-current liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Borrowings and financing | | 25,307 | | 2,772,462 | | | | 4,560,078 | | | | 12,620 | | 29,541 | | 2,657,635 | | | | 4,223,796 | | | | 23,443 | Other non-current liabilities | | 230,859 | | 564,407 | | 1,389 | | 220,001 | | 2,170 | | 1,193 | | 243,231 | | 444,379 | | 2,674 | | 3,172 | | | | 8,551 | otal non-current liabilities | | 256,166 | | 3,336,869 | | 1,389 | | 4,780,079 | | 2,170 | | 13,813 | | 272,772 | | 3,102,014 | | 2,674 | | 4,226,968 | | | | 31,994 | Shareholders’ equity | | 9,886,444 | | 2,985,637 | | 1,003 | | 2,233,068 | | 585,611 | | 21,204 | | 15,785,044 | | 2,848,213 | | 6,964 | | 2,070,404 | | 618,927 | | 13,120 | Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity | | 11,783,283 | | 8,060,685 | | 31,186 | | 7,430,699 | | 621,448 | | 101,147 | | 16,855,979 | | 7,184,409 | | 37,356 | | 6,569,297 | | 648,913 | | 123,378 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 11/30/2015 | | | | | | | | | | 01/01/2015 a 12/31/2015 | | | | | | | | | | | | 01/01/2014 a 12/31/2014 | | | Joint-Venture | | | | | | | | Joint-Operation | | Joint-Venture | | Joint-Operation | Balance sheet | | Nacional Minérios (*) | | MRS Logística | | CBSI | | Transnordestina Logística | | Itá Energética | | CGPAR | | Nacional Minérios (*) | | MRS Logística | | CBSI | | Transnordestina Logística | | Itá Energética | | CGPAR | | 59.76% | | 18.64% | | 50.00% | | 56.92% | | 48.75% | | 50.00% | | 60.00% | | 27.27% | | 50.00% | | 62.64% | | 48.75% | | 50.00% | Statements of Income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net revenue | | 751,595 | | 3,172,744 | | 151,097 | | | | 157,379 | | 172,388 | | 1,474,633 | | 3,063,061 | | 161,372 | | 14 | | 136,565 | | 278,855 | Cost of sales and services | | (557,504) | | (2,094,961) | | (147,186) | | | | (88,683) | | (132,034) | | (1,214,196) | | (2,013,846) | | (150,411) | | | | (86,751) | | (234,944) | Gross profit | | 194,091 | | 1,077,783 | | 3,911 | | | | 68,696 | | 40,354 | | 260,437 | | 1,049,215 | | 10,961 | | 14 | | 49,814 | | 43,911 | Operating (expenses) income | | (113,533) | | (371,798) | | (8,615) | | (32,863) | | (50,455) | | (14,480) | | (277,648) | | (282,736) | | (8,934) | | (28,459) | | (46,182) | | (3,572) | Finance income (costs), net | | 1,996,261 | | (255,003) | | (1,254) | | (18,309) | | 2,777 | | (1,713) | | 1,651,891 | | (190,294) | | 69 | | (15,383) | | 2,972 | | (1,309) | Income before income tax and social contribution | | 2,076,819 | | 450,982 | | (5,958) | | (51,172) | | 21,018 | | 24,161 | | 1,634,680 | | 576,185 | | 2,096 | | (43,828) | | 6,604 | | 39,030 | Current and deferred income tax and social contribution | | (148,964) | | (152,994) | | | | | | (7,041) | | (7,992) | | (512,913) | | (196,792) | | (946) | | | | (2,279) | | (13,030) | Profit / (loss) for the period | | 1,927,855 | | 297,988 | | (5,958) | | (51,172) | | 13,977 | | 16,169 | | 1,121,767 | | 379,393 | | 1,150 | | (43,828) | | 4,325 | | 26,000 |
(*) Refer to the consolidated balances and profit or loss of Nacional Minérios S. A. ·NACIONAL MINÉRIOS S.A. - (“Namisa”) Namisa, headquartered in Congonhas, State of Minas Gerais, is primarily engaged in the production, purchase and sale of iron ore and is mainly focused on foreign markets for the year refersale of its products. In 12/31/2015 Namisa was merged into Congonhas Minérios S.A. concluding the transaction with the Asian Consortium, as detailed in note 3 – Business combination. F-38
·ITÁ ENERGÉTICA S.A. - (“ITASA”) ITASA is a corporation established in July 1996 that was engaged to operate under a shared concession, the Itá Hydropower Plant (UHE Itá), with 1,450 MW of installed power, located on the Uruguay River, on the Santa Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul state border. ·MRS LOGÍSTICA S.A. (“MRS”) With registered offices in the City of Rio de Janeiro-RJ, this subsidiary is engaged in public railroad transportation, on the basis of an onerous concession, on the domain routes of the Southeast Grid of the federal railroad network (Rede Ferroviária Federal S.A. – RFFSA), located in the Southeast (Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo and Belo Horizonte. The concession has a 30-year term as from December 1, 1996, extendable for an equal term by exclusive decision of the concession grantor. MRS may further engage in services involving transportation modes related to railroad transportation and participate in projects aimed at expanding the railroad service concessions granted. For performance of the services covered by the concession for a, MRS leased from RFFSA for the same concession period, the assets required for operation and maintenance of the freight railroad transportation activities. At the end of the concession, all the leased assets are to be transferred to the ownership of the railroad transportation operator designated at that time. In 2014, the Company had a direct equity interestsinterest of 27.27% in the capital stock of MRS, as well as an indirect equity interest of 6% therein, together with its joint venture Namisa. The Company has transferred 8.63% of its direct participation in MRS to Congonhas under the business combination described in note 3. Owing to the transaction in question, as of December 31, 2015, the Company has a direct equity interest of 18.64% in the capital stock of MRS and an indirect equity interest of 18.63% through its subsidiary Congonhas Minérios, consequently the total participation is 37.27%. CONSÓRCIO DA USINA HIDRELÉTRICA DE IGARAPAVA The Igarapava Hydroelectric Power Plant is located on the Grande River, in the city of Conquista, MG, and has installed capacity of 210 MW. It consists of 5 bulb-type generating units. CSN holds a 17.92% investment in the consortium, whose specific purpose is the distribution of electric power, which is made according to the percentage equity interest of each company. The balance of property, plant and equipment less depreciation as of December 31, 2015 is R$27,084 (R$28,250 as of December 31, 2014) and the expense in 2015 amounted to R$5,040 (R$5,302 in 2014). ·CBSI - COMPANHIA BRASILEIRA DE SERVIÇOS DE INFRAESTRUTURA (“CBSI”) CBSI is the result of a joint operation between CSN and CKTR Brasil Ltda. Based in the city of Araucária, PR, CBSI is primarily engaged in providing services CSN and other third-party entities, and can operate activities related to the refurbishment and maintenance of industrial machinery and equipment, construction maintenance, industrial cleaning, logistic preparation of products, among other activities. F-39
·CGPAR CONSTRUÇÃO PESADA S.A. (“CGPAR”) CGPAR is the result of a joint venture between CSN and GPA Construção Pesada e Mineração Ltda. Based in the city of Belo Horizonte, MG, CGPAR is mainly engaged in providing services related to the support to the extraction of iron ore, earth leveling, earthmoving, and dam construction. ·TRANSNORDESTINA LOGÍSTICA S.A. (“TLSA”) TLSA is primarily engaged in the public service operation and development of a railroad network in the Northeast of Brazil network, comprising the rail segments Missão Velha-Salgueiro, Salgueiro-Trindade, Trindade-Eliseu Martins, Salgueiro- Porto de Suape, and Missão Velha-Porto de Pecém sections (“Railway System II”). During the year 2015, CSN and others shareholders subscribed 3,973,152 shares in TLSA amounting to R$213,834, which R$3,229 from CSN and R$210,605 from others shareholders, consequently at December 31, 2015 CSN held by CSN56.92% of TLSA share capital. Therefore, due to the transactions described above that caused a participation change of the shareholders in those companies.the share capital of TLSA on 2015, the Company recognized a gain of R$2,014, recorded in equity. a)Other investments9.f) Additional information on indirect participation in abroad operations
The breakdown of consolidated investments is as follows:
| 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | Panatlântica | 12,965 | | 12,030 | Usiminas | 2,323,172 | | 2,077,277 | Arvedi Metalfer do Brasil | 12,977 | | | Other | 2,660 | | (1,082) | | 2,351,774 | | 2,088,225 | | | | |
· RIVERSDALE MINING LIMITED - Riversdale STAHLWERK THÜRINGEN GMBH (“SWT”) On April 20, 2011,SWT was formed from the former industrial steel complex of Maxhütte, located in the Germany city of Unterwellenborn, which produces steel shapes used for construction in accordance with international quality standards.
Its main raw material is steel scrap, the Company through itshas an installed production capacity of 1.1 million metric tons steel/year. The SWT is a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of CSN Europe Lda., adhered to the tender offerSteel S.L.U, a subsidiary of Riversdale Mining Limited (“Riversdale”) shares conducted by Rio Tinto. Therefore, the Company sold 100% of its equity interest held in Riversdale’s share capital, corresponding to 47,291,891 shares of the price of A$16.50 per share, totaling A$780,316.CSN. · PANATLÂNTICA COMPANHIA SIDERURGICA NACIONAL – LLC (“CSN LLC”) Publicly-heldThe CSN LLC has an industrial plant in Terre Haute, Indiana State - USA, where is located the cold rolled and galvanized steel production lines. The LLC assets and liabilities came from the extinct Heartland Steel Inc., Incorporated in 2001. CSN LLC is a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of CSN Americas S.L.U, a subsidiary of CSN.
·LUSOSIDER AÇOS PLANOS S.A. (‘Lusosider’’) Incorporated in 1996 in succession to Siderurgia Nacional (a company privatized by the Portuguese government that year), Lusosider is the only Portuguese company of the steel industry to produce cold rolled and galvanized anti-corrosion steel. Based in Paio Pires, The Lusosider has an installed capacity of about 550,000 tons / year to produce four large groups of steel products: galvanized sheet, cold rolled sheet, pickled and oiled plate. The products are manufactured by Lusosider and may be used in the packaging industry, construction (pipes and metallic structures) and in home appliance components. 9.g) Other investments
·PANATLÂNTICA S. A. (“Panatlântica”) Panatlântica is a publicly-held company, headquartered in the city of Gravataí, State of Rio Grande do Sul, engaged in the manufacturing, trade, import, export and processing of steel and ferrous or non-ferrous metals, coated or not. This investment is classified as available-for-sale and measured at fair value. CSNThe Company currently holds 9.40%11.38% (11.40% as of December 31, 2014) of Panatlântica’s total share capital.
· USINAS SIDERURGICAS DE MINAS GERAIS S.A. – USIMINAS (“USIMINAS”) Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais S.A. – USIMINAS,Usiminas, headquartered in Belo Horizonte, State of Minas Gerais, is engaged in steel and related operations. USIMINASUsiminas produces flat rolled steel in the Intendente Câmara and José Bonifácio de Andrada e Silva plants, located in Ipatinga,
F-40
Minas Gerais, and Cubatão, São Paulo, respectively, to bethe final product is sold in the domestic market and also for exports. Itforeign market. Usiminas also exploits iron ore mines located in Itaúna, Minas Gerais, to meet its verticalization and production cost optimization strategies. USIMINASUsiminas also has service and distribution centers located in several regions of Brazil, and the Cubatão, São Paulo, and Praia Mole, Espírito Santo, ports, as well asall centers are located in strategic locations strategic for the shipment of its production. On April 9, 2014, the Administrative Council for Economic Defense (CADE - Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica) issued its decision on the matter about the Usiminas shares held by CSN signing a Performance Commitment Agreement), also called TCD, between CADE and CSN. Under the terms of the decision of CADE and TCD, CSN must reduce its interest in USIMINAS and evaluate strategic alternatives with respect to its investment in Usiminas. As of December 31, 2012,2015 and 2014, the Company reached holdings of14.13% 14.13% in common shares and20.69% 20.69% in preferred shares of Usiminas'USIMINAS share capital. USIMINAS is listed on the São Paulo Stock Exchange (“BM&F BOVESPA”: USIM3 and USIM5). ·• ARVEDI METALFER DO BRASIL S.A. (“Arvedi”)
On July 31, 2012, the Company acquired a non-controlling interest corresponding to 20% of the capital of Arvedi, Metalfer do Brasil S.A., company in pre-operating stage focused on the production of pipes, headquartered in Salto, State of São Paulo.
b)Investments in jointly controlled entities
The balances of the balance sheets and income statements of the companies under shared control are stated below and have been consolidated into the Company’s financial statements according to the percentage equity interests described below.
FS-32
| | | | | | | | 12/31/2012 | | | | | | | 12/31/2011 | | | Nacional Minérios (*) | | Itá Energética | | MRS Logística | | CBSI | | | Nacional Minérios (*) | | Itá Energética | | MRS Logística | Equity interest (%) | | 60.00% | | 48.75% | | 27.27% | | 50.00% | | | 60.00% | | 48.75% | | 27.27% | Balance sheet | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Current assets | | 5,654,420 | | 89,370 | | 931,922 | | 25,383 | | | 4,155,543 | | 81,729 | | 917,291 | Non-current assets | | 9,513,580 | | 680,621 | | 5,347,154 | | 3,887 | | | 9,526,804 | | 719,606 | | 4,625,495 | Long-term receivables | | 8,296,673 | | 39,771 | | 440,545 | | | | | 8,422,434 | | 44,239 | | 336,439 | Investments, PP&E and intangible assets | | 1,216,907 | | 640,850 | | 4,906,609 | | 3,887 | | | 1,104,370 | | 675,367 | | 4,289,056 | Total assets | | 15,168,000 | | 769,991 | | 6,279,076 | | 29,270 | | | 13,682,347 | | 801,335 | | 5,542,786 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Current liabilities | | 1,889,429 | | 87,658 | | 1,209,841 | | 16,131 | | | 1,260,068 | | 100,175 | | 1,108,938 | Non-current liabilities | | 355,401 | | 5,812 | | 2,555,114 | | 9,364 | | | 307,352 | | 62,637 | | 2,134,906 | Shareholders' equity | | 12,923,170 | | 676,521 | | 2,514,121 | | 3,775 | | | 12,114,927 | | 638,523 | | 2,298,942 | Total liabilities and shareholders' equity | | 15,168,000 | | 769,991 | | 6,279,076 | | 29,270 | | | 13,682,347 | | 801,335 | | 5,542,786 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Statements of Income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net revenue | | 3,836,415 | | 217,493 | | 3,013,158 | | 61,915 | | | 3,766,712 | | 242,913 | | 2,862,337 | Cost of sales and services | | (2,730,077) | | (66,162) | | (1,993,927) | | (58,245) | | | (2,168,655) | | (81,692) | | (1,732,552) | Gross profit | | 1,106,338 | | 151,331 | | 1,019,231 | | 3,670 | | | 1,598,057 | | 161,221 | | 1,129,785 | Operating (expenses) income | | (412,091) | | (48,688) | | (262,777) | | (3,807) | | | (135,782) | | (66,223) | | (199,754) | Finance income (costs), net | | 1,329,707 | | (1,745) | | (82,417) | | 174 | | | 1,040,693 | | (12,327) | | (134,272) | Profit before income tax and social contribution | | 2,023,954 | | 100,898 | | 674,037 | | 37 | | | 2,502,968 | | 82,671 | | 795,759 | Current and deferred income tax and social contribution | | (407,469) | | (33,962) | | (227,497) | | (10) | | | (429,624) | | (28,103) | | (272,714) | Profit for the year | | 1,616,485 | | 66,936 | | 446,540 | | 27 | | | 2,073,344 | | 54,568 | | 523,045 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(*) Refer to the consolidated balances and profit or loss of Nacional Minérios S. A.
The balance sheet and income statement amounts refer to 100% of the companies’ results.
·NACIONAL MINÉRIOS – NAMISA
Headquartered in Congonhas, State of Minas Gerais, this companyPaulo, is primarily engaged in the production, purchasepipe production. As of December 31, 2015 and sale2014 CSN held 20.00% of iron ore and is mainly focused on foreign markets the sale of its products. Its major operations are carried out in the cities of Congonhas, Ouro Preto, Itabirito and Rio Acima, in the State of Minas Gerais, and in Itaguaí, in the State of Rio de Janeiro.
CSN holds and proportionately consolidates 60% of Namisa’s capital.
FS-33
·ITÁ ENERGÉTICA S.A. - ITASA
ITASA is a corporation originally created to carry out the construction of the Itá hydroelectric power plant: contracting for the supply of goods and services necessary to carry out the project and raising funds, including posting the corresponding guarantees.
CSN holds 48.75% of ITASA’sArvedi’s share capital.
·MRS LOGÍSTICA
This subsidiary is engaged in providing public railroad freight transportation services, on the basis of an onerous concession agreement, on the tracks of the Southeast Network, located between the cities of Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo and Belo Horizonte, previously belonging to Rede Ferroviária Federal S.A.- RFFSA, which was privatized on September 20, 1996.
As of December 31, 2012 the Company directly held 27.27% and indirectly, through its jointly controlled entity Nacional Minérios S.A. (Namisa), 6% of MRS’s capital.
MRS can also engage in modal transportation services related to railroad transportation and also participate in projects aimed at expanding the railroad services granted on a concession basis.
For provision of the services covered by the concession agreement obtained for a period of 30 years starting on December 1, 1996, extendable for an equal period by exclusive decision of the concession grantor, MRS leased from RFFSA for the same concession period the assets required for operation and maintenance of the railroad freight transportation activities. Upon extinction of the concession, all leased assets will be transferred to the ownership of the railroad transportation operator designated in that same act.
·CONSÓRCIO DA USINA HIDRELÉTRICA DE IGARAPAVA
Igarapava Hydroelectric Power Plant is located in Rio Grande, in the city of Conquista, MG, with installed capacity of 210 MW. It consists of 5 bulb type generating units and is considered a major mark for power generation in Brazil.
CSN holds 17.92% of investment in the consortium, whose specific purpose is the distribution of electric power, which is made according to the percentage equity interest of each company.
The balance of property, plant and equipment less depreciation as of December 31,2012is R$30,584 (R$31,751 as of December 31, 2011) and the amount of the expense in 2012 is R$6,620(R$6,366 in2011).
·CBSI - COMPANHIA BRASILEIRA DE SERVIÇOS DE INFRAESTRUTURA
In December 2011, CSN subscribed to 1,876,146 common shares, corresponding to 50% of the capital of CBSI - Companhia Brasileira de Serviços de Infraestrutura (“CBSI”).The investment is the result of a joint venture between CSN and CKLS Serviços Ltda. Based in the city of Araucária, PR, CBSI is primarily engaged in providing services to subsidiaries, associates, controlling companies and third-party entities, and can operate activities related to the refurbishment and maintenance of industrial machinery and equipment, construction maintenance, industrial cleaning, logistic preparation of products, among other activities.
·CGPAR CONSTRUÇÃO PESADA S.A.
On July18,2012 CSN subscribed 50,000 common shares, corresponding to 50% of the capital of CGPAR CONSTRUÇÃO PESADA S.A. (“CGPAR”), totaling R$50,000.00. This subscription is the result of a joint venture formed by CSN and GPA Constru��ão Pesada e Mineração Ltda. Based in the city of Belo Horizonte, MG, CGPAR is mainly engaged in the provision of services related to the support to the extraction of iron ore, earth leveling, earthmoving, and dam construction.
FS-34
10. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT | | Land | | Buildings | | Machinery, equipment and facilities | | Furniture and fixtures | | Construction in progress | | Other (*) | | Total | Balance at December 31, 2010 | 175,792 | | 1,213,608 | | 6,974,024 | | 28,427 |
| 4,515,806 |
| 868,910 |
| 13,776,567 | Effect of foreign exchange differences | 1,234 | | 3,640 | | 16,377 | | 135 | | (157) | | 2,162 | | 23,391 | Acquisition through business combination | 3,325 | | 10,805 | | 14,050 | | 562 | | 4,204 | | 90,572 | | 123,518 | Acquisitions | | | | | | | | | 4,400,825 | | | | 4,400,825 | Disposal | | | (6,719) | | (30,059) | | (17) | | | | 19,097 | | (17,698) | Depreciation | | | (39,364) | | (821,672) | | (4,931) | | | | (65,441) | | (931,408) | Reversal of estimated losses on disposal of assets | | | | | | | | | | 4,774 | | 4,774 | Transfers to other asset categories | 14,233 | | 273,320 | | 1,477,118 | | 9,172 | | (1,848,785) | | 74,942 | | | Transfers to intangible assets | | | | | | | | | (11,104) | | (383) | | (11,487) | Other | | | (170) | | (4,883) | | 54 | | (4,470) | | 18,063 | | 8,594 | Balance at December 31, 2011 | 194,584 | | 1,455,120 | | 7,624,955 | | 33,402 |
| 7,056,319 |
| 1,012,696 |
| 17,377,076 | Cost | 194,584 | | 1,700,245 | | 11,138,198 | | 139,679 | | 7,056,319 | | 1,459,659 | | 21,688,684 | Accumulated depreciation | | | (245,125) | | (3,513,243) | | (106,277) | | | | (446,963) | | (4,311,608) | Balance at December 31, 2011 | 194,584 | | 1,455,120 | | 7,624,955 | | 33,402 |
| 7,056,319 |
| 1,012,696 |
| 17,377,076 | Effect of foreign exchange differences | 5,656 | | 22,322 | | 246,204 | | 379 | | 471 | | (148,244) | | 126,788 | Acquisition through business combination | 22,852 | | 103,739 | | 419,787 | | 1,202 | | 1,079 | | 33,819 | | 582,478 | Acquisitions | | | | | | | | | 3,142,634 | | | | 3,142,634 | Capitalized interests (Notes 25 and 32) | | | | | | | | | 409,498 | | | | 409,498 | Disposal | (1,375) | | (255) | | (10,135) | | (159) | | (769) | | 7,447 | | (5,246) | Depreciation | | | (70,509) | | (1,058,081) | | (13,474) | | | | (75,464) | | (1,217,528) | Estimated losses on disposal of assets | | | | | | | | | | | (6,676) | | (6,676) | Transfers to other asset categories | (32,855) | | 101,572 | | 1,001,977 | | 17,076 | | (1,123,481) | | 35,711 | | | Transfers to intangible assets | | | | | | | | | (8,808) | | (787) | | (9,595) | Other | | | | | (74,552) | | | | 62,787 | | 21,083 | | 9,318 | Balance at December 31, 2012 | 188,862 | | 1,611,989 | | 8,150,155 | | 38,426 |
| 9,539,730 |
| 879,585 |
| 20,408,747 | Cost | 188,862 | | 1,917,814 | | 12,758,762 | | 151,008 | | 9,539,730 | | 1,397,841 | | 25,954,017 | Accumulated depreciation | | | (305,825) | | (4,608,607) | | (112,582) | | | | (518,256) | | (5,545,270) | Balance at December 31, 2012 | 188,862 | | 1,611,989 | | 8,150,155 | | 38,426 |
| 9,539,730 |
| 879,585 |
| 20,408,747 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Consolidated | | Land | | Buildings | | Machinery. equipment and facilities | | Furniture and fixtures | | Construction in progress | | Other (*) | | Total | Balance at December 31, 2014 | 216,458 | | 2,432,450 | | 10,499,676 | | 36,633 | | 2,243,967 | | 194,956 | | 15,624,140 | Cost | 216,458 | | 3,021,437 | | 16,791,750 | | 167,410 | | 2,243,967 | | 414,276 | | 22,855,298 | Accumulated depreciation | | | (588,987) | | (6,292,074) | | (130,777) | | | | (219,320) | | (7,231,158) | Balance at December 31, 2014 | 216,458 | | 2,432,450 | | 10,499,676 | | 36,633 | | 2,243,967 | | 194,956 | | 15,624,140 | Exchange rate effect | 16,418 | | 51,910 | | 230,588 | | 1,453 | | 5,498 | | 4,833 | | 310,700 | Acquisitions | 1,841 | | 9,710 | | 242,656 | | 3,292 | | 1,914,732 | | 10,355 | | 2,182,586 | Capitalized interest (notes 25 and 31) | | | | | | | | | 166,366 | | | | 166,366 | Write-offs (note 24) | | | | | (2,507) | | (49) | | (3,827) | | (83) | | (6,466) | Depreciation | | | (103,387) | | (1,005,848) | | (6,214) | | | | (11,573) | | (1,127,022) | Transfers to other asset categories | 22,623 | | 95,524 | | 880,652 | | 81 | | (1,270,903) | | 272,023 | | | Transfers to intangible assets | | | | | | | | | (1,852) | | | | (1,852) | Business Combination, fair value of assets acquired (nota 3) | 6,949 | | 215,642 | | 266,934 | | 3,790 | | 146,734 | | 67,047 | | 707,096 | Update of the ARO estimation | | | | | | | | | | | 22,582 | | 22,582 | Others | | | (5,723) | | (2,879) | | | | (1,329) | | 3,400 | | (6,531) | Balance at December 31, 2015 | 264,289 | | 2,696,126 | | 11,109,272 | | 38,986 | | 3,199,386 | | 563,540 | | 17,871,599 | Cost | 264,289 | | 3,436,458 | | 18,638,117 | | 183,086 | | 3,199,386 | | 811,535 | | 26,532,871 | Accumulated depreciation | | | (740,332) | | (7,528,845) | | (144,100) | | | | (247,995) | | (8,661,272) | Balance at December 30, 2015 | 264,289 | | 2,696,126 | | 11,109,272 | | 38,986 | | 3,199,386 | | 563,540 | | 17,871,599 |
(*) In consolidated, referRefer basically to railway assets such as yards,courtyards, tracks and railway sleepers.leasehold improvements, vehicles, hardware, mines, ore deposits, and spare part inventories. FS-35F-41
The breakdown of the projects comprising construction in progress is as follows: | | Project objective | | Start date | | Scheduled completion | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | | | | | | | | Consolidated | Project description | | | Start date | | Completion date | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Logistics | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Current investments for maintenance of current operations. | | | | | | | 35,457 | | 45,522 | | | | | | | | 35,457 | | 45,522 | Mining | | | | | | | | | | Expansion of Casa de Pedra Mine capacity production. | | | 2007 | | 2016/2017 | (1) | 709,945 | | 462,075 | Expansion of TECAR export capacity. | | | 2009 | | 2020 | (2) | 390,920 | | 332,394 | Current investments for maintenance of current operations. | | | | | | | 302,764 | | 60,236 | | | | | | | | 1,403,629 | | 854,705 | Steel | | | | | | | | | | Construction of a long steel plant to produce rebar and machine wire. | | | 2008 | | 2016 | (3) | 105,697 | | 95,991 | Implementation of the AF#3’s gas pressure recovery. | | | 2006 | | 2015 | | | | 1,140 | Expansion of the service center/Mogi. | | | 2013 | | 2015/2016 | (4) | 14,950 | | 46,993 | Current investments for maintenance of current operations. | | | | | | | 375,579 | | 159,499 | | | | | | | | 496,226 | | 303,623 | Cement | | | | | | | | | | Construction of cement plants. | | | 2011 | | 2016 | (5) | 1,254,897 | | 1,030,938 | Current investments for maintenance of current operations. | | | | | | | 9,177 | | 9,179 | | | Expansion of Transnordestina railroad by 1,728 km to boost the transportation of varied products as iron ore, limestone, soybeans, cotton, sugarcane, fertilizers, oil and fuels. | | 2009 | | 2016 | | 4,642,102 | | 3,489,871 | | | | | | 1,264,074 | | 1,040,117 | | | Expansion of MRS's capacity and current investments for maintenance of current operations. | | | | | | 232,818 | | 290,410 | | | | | | 3,199,386 | | 2,243,967 | | | Current investments for maintenance of current operations. | | | | | | 37,589 | | 15,479 | | | | | | | | | | 4,912,509 | | 3,795,760 | | Mining | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Expansion of Casa de Pedra Mine capacity production to 42 Mtpa. | | 2007 | | 2015 | (1) | 1,613,130 | | 1,322,433 | | | | Expansion of TECAR to permit an annual exportation of 60 Mtpa. | | 2009 | | 2016 | | 714,986 | | 425,134 | | | | Expansion of Namisa capacity production. | | 2008 | | 2016 | (2) | 131,408 | | 137,059 | | | | Current investments for maintenance of current operations. | | | | | | 13,080 | | 46,421 | | | | | | | | | | 2,472,604 | | 1,931,047 | | Steel | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Implementation of the long steel mill in the states of Rio de Janeiro, Minas Gerais and São Paulo for production of rebar and wire rod. | | 2008 | | 2013 | (3) | 1,460,694 | | 907,521 | | | | Current investments for maintenance of current operations. | | | | | | 416,855 | | 256,718 | | | | | | | | | | 1,877,549 | | 1,164,239 | | Cement | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Construction of integrated cement unit in Arcos, MG. | | 2011 | | 2014/2015 | (4) | 241,412 | | 132,986 | | | | Construction of clinquer plant in Arcos, MG | | 2007 | | 2013 | (5) | 10,109 | | 27,536 | | | | Current investments for maintenance of current operations. | | | | | | 25,547 | | 4,751 | | | | | | | | | | 277,068 | | 165,273 | | Total construction in progress | | | | | | 9,539,730 | | 7,056,319 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1) Expected date for completion of the 40 Mtpa and 42 Mtpa stagesCentral Plant Stage 1; (2) Estimated date for the completion of the 60 mtpa phase; (3)Refers to advance for construction of two new plants, which were converted in the third quarter of 2015 to a supply contract of equipment for using in steelmaking operation. (4)Expected date for completion of Magnetic Concentrators Projects in Pires and B4/B5Service Center/Mogi; (3)(5) Expected date for completion of the Rio de Janeiro unitArcos/Minas Gerais unit.
(4)Expected date for completion of new grinding units in Arcos – MG and new clinker furnace
(5)Start-up in March 2011, expected date for completion of ramp-up.
The costs classified in construction in progress comprise basically the acquisition of services, purchase of parts to be used as investments for improvement of performance, upgrading of technology, enlargement, expansion and acquisition of assets that will be transferred to the relevant line items and depreciated as from the time they are available for use.
The costs incurred to refurbish and replace property, plant and equipment items totaled R$273,339 as of December 31, 2012 (R$654,865as of December 31, 2011), which were capitalized and will be depreciated over the period until the next maintenance event.
Other repair and maintenance expenses are charged to operating costs and expenses when incurred.
In view2015 the management conducted a review of the need to review the useful lives at least every financial year, in 2012 management performed the review for all the Company’sCompany's units. As a result,Therefore, the estimated useful lives for the current year are as follows: | Years | | | Consolidated | In Years | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Buildings | 43 | | 43 | Machinery, equipment and facilities | 18 | | 18 | Furniture and fixtures | 11 | | 10 | Other (*) | 14 | | 29 |
(*) In 2015, after review, the assets of locomotives, wagons and above structure, which were which were on average depreciated over 29 years and inserted into other, were reclassified to the class Buildings and Machinery, equipment and facilities. | Buildings
| 46
| Machinery, equipment and facilities
| 14
| Furniture and fixtures
| 11
| Other
| 30
|
FS-36F-42
10.a) Depreciation and amortization expense: Additions to depreciation, amortization and depletion for the period were distributed as follows: | | | Consolidated | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Production costs | 1,112,538 | | 1,222,302 | Sales expenses | 9,358 | | 9,066 | General and Administrative Expenses | 13,876 | | 13,763 | | 1,135,772 | | 1,245,131 | Other operating expenses (*) | 41,068 | | 36,354 | | 1,176,840 | | 1,281,485 |
(*) Refers to the depreciation of unused equipment and intangible assets amortization, see note 23. a)10.b) Capitalized Interest
As of December 31, 2012,2015, the Company capitalized borrowing costs amounting to R$409,498 (R$353,156 as166,366 (as of December 31,2011) 2014, R$ 165,789). These costs are basically estimated for the cement, mining cement,and long steel and Transnordestina projects, mainly relating to:(i) new integrated cement plant, (ii) Casa de Pedra Mine expansion; (ii) construction of the cement plant in Volta Redonda, RJ, and the clinker plant in the city of Arcos, MG;expansion (iii) construction of the; long steel mill in the city of Volta Redonda RJ; and (iv) extension of Transnordestina railroad, which will connect the countryside of the northeast region to the Suape, State of Pernambuco, and Pecém, State of Ceará(RJ), ports (Seesee notes 25 and 32).31. The rates used to capitalize borrowing costs are as follows: Rates | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | Specífic projects | | TJLP + 1.3% to 3.2% | | TJLP + 1.3% to 3.2% | | UM006 + 2.7% | | UM006 + 2.7% | Non-specífic projects | | 8.47% | | 10.56% |
Rates | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Unspecified projects | 11,35% | | 10.03% |
b)Additions to depreciation, amortization and depletion for the year were distributed as follows:
| 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | Production cost | 1,178,884 | | 892,297 | Selling expenses | 8,046 | | 7,130 | General and administrative expenses | 28,924 | | 29,941 | | 1,215,854 | | 929,368 | Other operating expenses (*) | 14,797 | | 18,883 | | 1,230,651 | | 948,251 | | | | |
(*) Refers to the depreciation of unused equipment (see note 24).
c)The Casa de Pedra mine is an asset that belongs to CSN, which has the exclusive right to explore such mine. Our mining activities of Casa de Pedra are based on the ‘Mine Manifest’, which grants CSN full ownership over the mineral deposits existing within our property limits.
As of December 31, 2012 the net property, plant and equipment of Casa de Pedra was R$2,892,120 (R$2,485,077 as of December 31, 2011), represented mainly by construction in progress amounting to R$1,612,000 (R$1,123,821 as of December 31, 2011).
FS-37
11. INTANGIBLE ASSETS | Consolidated | | Goodw ill |
| Customer relationships | | Software |
| Trademarks and patents | | Rights and licenses | | Others |
| Total | Balance at December 31, 2014 | 407,434 | | 347,115 | | 79,867 | | 109,052 | | | | 185 | | 943,653 | Cost | 666,768 | | 415,964 | | 153,080 | | 109,052 | | | | 185 | | 1,345,049 | Accumulated amortization | (150,004) | | (68,849) | | (73,213) | | | | | | | | (292,066) | Adjustment for accumulated recoverable value | (109,330) | | | | | | | | | | | | (109,330) | Balance at December 31, 2014 | 407,434 | | 347,115 | | 79,867 | | 109,052 | | | | 185 | | 943,653 | Effect of foreign exchange differences | | | 104,136 | | 191 | | 34,584 | | | | 60 | | 138,971 | Acquisitions and expenditures | | | | | 1,234 | | | | 78 | | 150 | | 1,462 | Business combination, fair value of assets e | | | | | | | | | | | | | | goodw ill (nota 3b) | 3,691,031 | | 1,531 | | 3,437 | | | | 726,390 | | | | 4,422,389 | Transfer of property. Plant and equipment | | | | | 930 | | | | 922 | | | | 1,852 | Amortization | | | (39,395) | | (10,423) | | | | | | | | (49,818) | Balance at December 31, 2015 | 4,098,465 | | 413,387 | | 75,236 | | 143,636 | | 727,390 | | 395 | | 5,458,509 | Cost | 4,357,799 | | 549,413 | | 173,154 | | 143,636 | | 727,390 | | 395 | | 5,951,787 | Accumulated amortization | (150,004) | | (136,026) | | (97,918) | | | | | | | | (383,948) | Adjustment for accumulated recoverable value | (109,330) | | | | | | | | | | | | (109,330) | Balance at December 31, 2015 | 4,098,465 | | 413,387 | | 75,236 | | 143,636 | | 727,390 | | 395 | | 5,458,509 |
As a result, the estimated useful lives for the current year are as follows: | Goodwill | | Intangibles with finite used lives | | Customer relations | | Software | | Other | | Total | Balance at December 31, 2010 | 423,698 | | 4,991 | | | | 32,765 | | 1,002 | | 462,456 | Effect of foreign exchange differences | | | | | | | 6 | | 72 | | 78 | Acquisitions through business combination (*) | 204,569 | | | | | | | | | | 204,569 | Acquisitions and expenditures | | | | | | | 350 | | 357 | | 707 | Disposals | | | | | | | (784) | | (489) | | (1,273) | Impairment losses | (60,861) | | | | | | | | | | (60,861) | Transfer of property, plant and equipment | | | | | | | 11,487 | | | | 11,487 | Transfer of long-term receivables | | | | | | | | | 2,977 | | 2,977 | Amortization | | | (4,991) | | | | (9,622) | | (2,230) | | (16,843) | Other movements | | | | | | | (2,113) | | 2,190 | | 77 | Balance at December 31, 2011 | 567,406 | | | | | | 32,089 | | 3,879 | | 603,374 | Cost | 908,576 | | 4,991 | | | | 86,070 | | 6,087 | | 1,005,724 | Accumulated amortization | (280,309) | | (4,991) | | | | (53,981) | | (2,208) | | (341,489) | Accumulated impairment adjustment | (60,861) | | | | | | | | | | (60,861) | Balance at December 31, 2011 | 567,406 | | | | | | 32,089 | | 3,879 | | 603,374 | Effect of foreign exchange differences | | | | | 30,501 | | 104 | | 14,045 | | 44,650 | Acquisitions through business combination (**) | 235,595 | | | | 316,939 | | | | 77,231 | | 629,765 | Acquisitions and expenditures | | | | | | | 961 | | 571 | | 1,532 | Disposals | | | | | | | (1) | | (564) | | (565) | Transfer of property, plant and equipment | | | | | | | 9,595 | | | | 9,595 | Amortization | | | | | | | (12,975) | | (148) | | (13,123) | Other movements | | | | | | | 210 | | 14 | | 224 | Balance at December 31, 2012 | 803,001 | | | | 347,440 | | 29,983 | | 95,028 | | 1,275,452 | Cost | 1,194,059 | | | | 347,441 | | 85,183 | | 97,405 | | 1,724,088 | Accumulated amortization | (330,197) | | | | | | (55,200) | | (2,378) | | (387,775) | Accumulated impairment adjustment | (60,861) | | | | | | | | | | (60,861) | Balance at December 31, 2012 | 803,001 | | | | 347,441 | | 29,983 | | 95,027 | | 1,275,452 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Consolidated | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Software | 5 | | 5 | Customer relationships | 13 | | 13 |
F-43
·Impairment testing The goodwill arising from expectations for future profitability of the companies acquired and the intangible assets with indefinite useful lives (trademarks) have been allocated to the operational divisions (cash-generating units) of CSN, which represent the lowest level of assets or group of assets. When a CGU has an intangible asset with indefinite useful life allocated, the Company performs an impairment test. The CGU with intangible assets in this situation are as follows: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Consolidated | | | | | Goodwill | | Brands | | Total | Cash generating unity | | Segment | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Packaging (*) | | Steel | | 158,748 | | 158,748 | | | | | | 158,748 | | 158,748 | Flat steel (**) | | Steel | | 13,091 | | 13,091 | | | | | | 13,091 | | 13,091 | Long steel (***) | | Steel | | 235,595 | | 235,595 | | 143,636 | | 109,052 | | 379,231 | | 344,647 | Mining (****) | | Mining | | 3,691,031 | | | | | | | | 3,691,031 | | | | | | | 4,098,465 | | 407,434 | | 143,636 | | 109,052 | | 4,242,101 | | 516,486 |
(*) Goodwill based on expected future earnings, arising onThe goodwill of the business combinationPackaging cash-generating unit is shown net of Prada Embalagens with CBL on July 12, 2011.impairment loss in the amount of R$109,330. (**) Goodwill based on expected future earnings, arising onof flat steel is allocated to the steel operation CSN, considering the operation of the Presidente Vargas Steelworks and other assets involved in other product processing steps until its sale to the customer. (***) The goodwill and trademark that are recorded in line item intangible assets at long steel segment, those transactions are derived from the business combination of CSN Steel S. L. with the companies Stahlwerk Thüringen Gmbh (SWT)Thuringen GmbH ("SWT") and Gallardo Sections on January 31, 2012 (see note 3).CSN. The assets mentioned are considered to have indefinite useful lives as they are expected to contribute indefinitely to the Company's cash flows. The useful life(****) Refers to the goodwill based on expectations for future profitability, resulting from the acquisition of software is 01Namisa by Congonhas Minério, an operation that was concluded in December 2015. As from 2016, the balance will be tested annually for impairment. See further details relating to 05 years andcalculation of other intangible assets is13 to 30 years.
Goodwill: The economic basis ofthe goodwill is the expected future earnings and, in accordance with the new pronouncements, these amounts are not amortized since January 1, 2009, when they became subject only to impairment testing.
·Impairment testing for goodwill
In order to conduct impairment testing, goodwill is allocated to CSN’s operating divisions that represent the lowest level ofassets or group of assetsat which goodwill is monitored by the Company's senior management, never above Operating Segments.note 3 – Business Combination.
FS-38
Cash generating unit | | Segment | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | | Investor | Mining | | Mining | | 347,098 | | 347,098 | | Namisa | Packaging (*) | | Steel | | 207,217 | | 207,217 | | CSN | Flat steel | | Steel | | 13,091 | | 13,091 | | CSN | Long steel | | Steel | | 235,595 | | | | CSN Steel S.L. | | | | | 803,001 | | 567,406 | | | | | | | | | | | |
(*) GoodwillThe impairment testing of the goodwill and the trademark include the balance of property, plant and equipment of the cash-generating unit (CGU) Containersunits and also the intangible. The test is presented net of an impairment loss recorded in 2011 amounting in line item other operating income and expenses in the income statement for the year, amounting to R$60,861.
The recoverable amount of a Cash-Generating Unit (“CGU”) is determined based on value-in-use calculations.
These calculations use cash flow projections, before income tax and social contribution, based on financial budgets approved by management for a three-year period. The amounts related to cash flows subsequent to the three-year period were extrapolated based on the estimated growth rates shown below. Thecomparison between the actual balances and the value in use of those units, determining based on the projections of discounted cash flows and use of such assumptions and judgements as: revenue growth rate, does not exceedcosts and expenses, discount rate, working capital, future Capex investment and macroeconomic assumptions observable in the average long-term growth rate of the industry in which the Cash-Generating Unit (“CGU”) operates.market.
The main assumptions used in calculating the valuestest were as follows: Segment | | Real Discount Rate | | Revenue Growth Rate | Long steel (*) | | 7.90% | | 3.53% | Metal packaging | | 9.39% | | 6.07% |
(*) The assets tested are located in use asGermany. The discount rate is calculated in Euro and the growth rate is the expectation for the region of Europe, the market in which this CGU generates cash flows. Based on the analyses conducted by Management, was not necessary to record losses by impairment to those assets in the year ended on December 31, 2012 are as follows:2015.
|
| Mining
|
| Steel containers
|
| Flat steel
|
| Long steel
| Gross margin (i)
| | Margin was determined taking into consideration the expansion plans already approved in the Company’s business plan. We took into consideration iron ore prices in the international market based on projections prepared by official mining industry institutions and for the exchange rate we took into consideration a projected curve of the US dollar rate in relation to the Brazilian real through 2018, made available by the Central Bank of Brazil, and exchange fluctuation in 2018 and thereafter is nil;
| | Average Gross Margin of each Cash Generating Unit based on the history and projections approved by the Board for the next three years, long-term price and foreign exchange curves obtained in industry reports, and gains from the synergy between the Company’s packaging units;
| | Average Gross Margin of each Cash Generating Unit based on the history and projections approved by the Board for the next three years, and long-term price and foreign exchange curves obtained in industry reports;
| | Based on the projections approved by the Board for the next three years, long-term price and foreign exchange curves, and taking into consideration the production volume ramp up after plant start-up;
| Cost adjustment
| | Cost adjustment based on historical data and price and foreign exchange curves obtained in industry reports;
| | Cost adjustment based on historical data and price and foreign exchange curves obtained in industry reports;
| | Cost adjustment based on historical data and price and foreign exchange curves obtained in industry reports;
| | Cost adjustment based on historical data and price and foreign exchange curves obtained in industry reports;
| Growth rate (ii)
| | The cash flows take into consideration the projection period through 2052 due to the extension of the deadlines for the implementation of some projects, and the maturities of the main contracts for which this business plan was developed, and this it is not necessary to take into account the growth rate since the projection period exceeds 30 years;
| | Average growth rate of 2.5% p.a. used to extrapolate the cash flows after the budgeted period;
| | Average growth rate of 2.0% p.a. used to extrapolate the cash flows after the budgeted period;
| | Average growth rate of 2.0% p.a. used to extrapolate the cash flows after the budgeted period;
| Discount rate (iii)
| | Effective discount rate of 8.2% p.a., before income tax and social contribution.
| | Effective discount rate of 8.2% p.a., before income tax and social contribution.
| | Effective discount rate of 8.2% p.a., before income tax and social contribution.
| | Effective discount rate of 8.2% p.a., before income tax and social contribution.
|
(i) Budgeted gross margin.
(ii) Weighted average growth rate, used to extrapolate the cash flows after the budgeted period.
(iii) Pretax discount rate, applied to cash flow projections.
FS-39F-44
12. BORROWINGS, FINANCING AND DEBENTURES TheAs December 31, 2015 the balances of borrowings, financing and debentures, which are carried at amortized cost, are as follows:
| Rates in (%) | | Current liabilities | | Non-current liabilities | Consolidated | | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | Rates p.a. (%) | Current liabilities | | Non-current liabilities | FOREIGN CURRENCY | | | | | | | | | | | | | Rates p.a. (%) | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | FOREIGNCURRENCY | | | | | | | | | Prepayment | 1% to 3.50% | | 162,290 | | 381,333 | | 1,104,271 | | 573,388 | 1% to 3.5% | 207,657 | | 346,719 | | 2,633,137 | | 2,338,327 | Prepayment | 3.51% to 7.50% | | 8,954 | | 148,597 | | 878,705 | | 1,281,171 | 3.51% to 8% | 286,487 | | 12,411 | | 3,429,716 | | 1,713,249 | Perpetual bonds | 7.00% | | 2,781 | | 2,553 | | 2,043,500 | | 1,875,800 | 7% | 5,315 | | 3,615 | | 3,904,800 | | 2,656,200 | Fixed rate notes | 6.50% to 10.00% | | 1,265,330 | | 119,030 | | 4,802,225 | | 5,064,660 | 4.14% to 10% | 175,768 | | 1,236,634 | | 6,910,992 | | 4,996,352 | Financed imports | 6.01% to 8.00% | | 30,413 | | 25,248 | | 50,989 | | 27,310 | | CCB | 1.54% | | | | 176,440 | | | | | | BNDES/FINAME | Res. 635/87 interest + 1.7% and 2.7% | | 32,395 | | 25,903 | | 10,755 | | 36,750 | | Intercompany | | | | | | | | | | | Forfaiting | | 1.25% to 3.28% | 288,772 | | 414,442 | | | | | Other | 1.40% to 8.00% and CDI + 1.2% | | 25,262 | | 105,442 | | 411,274 | | 145,438 | 1.2% to 8% | 115,594 | | 51,634 | | 425,635 | | 387,240 | | | | 1,527,425 | | 984,546 | | 9,301,719 | | 9,004,517 | | 1,079,593 | | 2,065,455 | | 17,304,280 | | 12,091,368 | LOCAL CURRENCY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | BNDES/FINAME | TJLP + 1.5% to 5% | | 415,480 | | 430,432 | | 1,956,981 | | 1,744,727 | 1,3% + TJLP and fixed rate 2.5% to 6% + 1,5% | 55,435 | | 85,373 | | 1,018,189 | | 965,849 | Debentures | 103.6% to 110.8% CDI and 1% + TJLP | | 144,902 | | 672,073 | | 4,613,634 | | 2,822,424 | 110.8% to 113.7% of CDI | 60,670 | | 847,411 | | 1,750,000 | | 1,550,000 | Prepayment | 104.8%, 109.5% and 111% CDI | 163,961 | | 537,128 | | 4,856,557 | | 4,523,224 | 109.5% to 116.5% of CDI and fixed rate of 8% | 522,418 | | 118,870 | | 5,200,000 | | 5,345,000 | CCB | 112.5% CDI | | 62,072 | | 101,280 | | 7,200,000 | | 7,200,000 | 112.5% and 113% of CDI | 92,976 | | 101,841 | | 7,200,000 | | 7,200,499 | Intercompany | | | | | | | | | | | Drawee risk | | | 84,063 | | 56,237 | | | | | Other | | | 12,599 | | 9,509 | | 29,398 | | 37,058 | | 6,229 | | 9,422 | | 12,107 | | 11,549 | | | | 799,014 | | 1,750,422 | | 18,656,570 | | 16,327,433 | | 821,791 | | 1,219,154 | | 15,180,296 | | 15,072,897 | Total borrowings and financing | Total borrowings and financing | | 2,326,439 | | 2,734,968 | | 27,958,289 | | 25,331,950 | Total borrowings and financing | 1,901,384 | | 3,284,609 | | 32,484,576 | | 27,164,265 | Transaction costs and issue premiums | Transaction costs and issue premiums | | (31,030) | | (32,885) | | (101,939) | | (145,445) | Transaction costs and issue premiums | (26,703) | | (23,406) | | (76,742) | | (71,410) | Total borrowings and financing + transaction costs | Total borrowings and financing + transaction costs | | 2,295,409 | | 2,702,083 | | 27,856,350 | | 25,186,505 | Total borrowings and financing + transaction costs | 1,874,681 | | 3,261,203 | | 32,407,834 | | 27,092,855 | | | | | | | | | | | |
The balances of prepaid intragroup borrowings related to the Company totalforfaiting and drawee risk operations totaled R$2,339,776 as of 372,835 at December 31, 2012 (R$2,244,927 as of2015 (R $ 470,679 at December 31, 2011) and the balances of Fixed rate notes and Intercompany bonds total R$3,545,340 (R$3,404,701 as of December 31, 2011)2014), see note18.
Funding transaction costsNote 2aa.
As of December 31, 2012, funding transaction costs are as follows:
| | Current | | Non-current | | TJ (1) | | TIR (2) | | | | | | Fixed rate notes | 1,654 | | 1,717 | | 6.5% to 10% | | 6.75% to 10.7% | BNDES | | 2,088 | | 5,606 | | 1.3% to 3.2% | | 1.44% to 9.75% | Prepayment | | 8,059 | | 14,369 | | 109.50% and 110.79% CDI | | 10.08% to 12.44% | Prepayment | | 908 | | 2,969 | | 2.37% and 3.24% | | 2.68% to 4.04% | CCB | | 17,472 | | 72,306 | | 112.5% CDI | | 11.33% to 14.82% | Other | | 849 | | 4,972 | | 105.8% and 110.8% CDI | | 12.59% and 13.27% | | | 31,030 | | 101,939 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(1)TJ – Annual interest rate contracted
(2)TIR – Annual internal rate of return
FS-40
· Maturities of borrowings, financing and debentures presented in non-current liabilities As of December 31, 2012,2015, the inflation-adjusted principal of long-term borrowings, financing and debentures by maturity year is as follows: 2014 | | 2,917,379 | | 10% | 2015 | | 3,886,092 | | 14% | 2016 | | 3,281,664 | | 12% | 2017 | | 3,530,240 | | 13% | 2018 | | 3,726,463 | | 13% | After 2018 | | 8,572,951 | | 31% | Perpetual bonds | | 2,043,500 | | 7% | | | 27,958,289 | | 100% | | | | | |
| | | | Consolidated | 2017 | | 1,458,605 | | 4% | 2018 | | 5,779,525 | | 18% | 2019 | | 7,870,087 | | 24% | 2020 | | 8,483,766 | | 26% | 2021 | | 2,320,721 | | 7% | After 2021 | | 2,667,072 | | 8% | Perpetual bonds | 3,904,800 | | 13% | | | 32,484,576 | | 100% |
· AmortizationsDebt renegotiation In September 2015, the Company completed the lengthening of part of its debts with Caixa Economica Federal amounting to R$ 2,570,000, and with Banco do Brasil SA, amounting to R$ 2,208,000, changing the maturities scheduled for the years 2016 and 2017 for the period between 2018 and 2022, in installments equally distributed. F-45
·Amortization and new borrowings, financing and debentures The table below shows the amortizations and new funding intransactions and redemption during the current year: | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | Opening balance | | 27,888,588 | | 20,089,447 | Funding | | 3,721,945 | | 7,824,012 | Amortization | | (4,821,661) | | (3,614,606) | Other (*) | | 3,362,887 | | 3,589,735 | Closing balance | | 30,151,759 | | 27,888,588 | | | | | |
| | | | Consolidated | | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Opening balance | | 30,354,058 | | 27,788,695 | Funding transactions | | 978,206 | | 1,907,479 | Forfaiting funding / Drawee Risk | | 924,706 | | 641,430 | Repayment | | (2,850,077) | | (1,460,478) | Charges – payments | | (1,146,306) | | (276,754) | Forfaiting payments | | (2,957,762) | | (2,401,241) | Forfaiting charges | | (7,064) | | (2,078) | Provision of charges | | 3,052,164 | | 2,524,849 | Provision charges Forfaiting / Drawee Risk | | 2,032 | | | Other(1) | | 5,932,558 | | 1,632,156 | Closing balance | | 34,282,515 | | 30,354,058 |
(*)(1) Includes interests, unrealized foreign exchange and inflation adjustments.
Borrowingmonetary gains and financing contracts with certain financial institutions contain some covenants that are usual in financial agreements in general and the Company is compliant with them as of December 31, 2012.losses.
In January 2012,2015 the Company secured a financing facility contracted by its subsidiary CSN Steel S.L., amounting to €120 million, to partially finance the acquisition of all the shares held by Grupo Alfonso Gallardo, S.L.U. (“Gallardo Group”) in the companies Stahlwerk Thüringen GmbH (“SWT”)Group captures and Gallardo Sections S.L.U. In January 2012, the Company priced, through its wholly-owned subsidiary CSN Resources S.A., an additional bond issue amounting to US$200 million, by reopening the US$1 billion bonds, maturing in July 2020.amortizing loans as shown below:
In September 2012, the Company settled the commercial promissory notes by paying R$800,000in principal and R$33,277 in interest.
· Debentures Funding i. Companhia Siderúrgica NacionalTransaction | | Financial institution | | Date | | Amount | | Maturity | Promissory note | | Banco do Brasil | | March 2015 | | 100,000 | | July 2015 | Export Credit Note | | Banco do Brasil | | January 2015 | | 200,000 | | December 2017 | 8th Issue of Debentures | | Banco do Brasil | | January 2015 | | 100,000 | | January 2022 | 9th Issue of Debentures | | Banco do Brasil | | July 2015 | | 100,000 | | March 2022 | Pre - Export Payment | | Caterpillar | | April 2015 | | 208,563 | | March 2020 | Pre - Export Payment | | Caterpillar | | July 2015 | | 260,375 | | March 2020 | Other | | | | | | 9,268 | | | Total | | | | | | 978,206 | | |
·Amortization | | Payment of principal | | Debt charges | Fixed Rate Notes | | 1,048,880 | | 729,992 | Debentures | | 782,500 | | 274,431 | Bank Credit Bill | | | | 1,031,735 | Export Credit Note | | | | 695,291 | Advance Cambial Agreement | | 52,839 | | 1,434 | Pre - Export Payment | | 387,651 | | 191,481 | Promissory note | | 100,000 | | 3,620 | BNDES/FINAME | | 48,656 | | 28,540 | Pre - Debt Payment | | 416,269 | | | Others | | 13,282 | | 1,238 | Total | | 2,850,077 | | 2,957,762 |
4th issue
In February 2012, the Company settled the fourth issue debentures amounting to R$600,000 in principal and R$35,285 in interest.
5th issue
In July 2011 the Company issued 115 nonconvertible, unsecured debentures, in single series, with a unit face value of R$10,000 totaling R$1,150,000 that pay interest equivalent to 110.80% of the CDI Cetip rate per year, and mature in July 2019, with early redemption option.
FS-41F-46
6h issue
In September 2012 the Company issued 156,500 nonconvertible, unsecured debentures, of which 106,500 1st series debentures and 50,000 2nd series debentures, with a unit face value of R$10 totaling R$1,565,000 that pay interest equivalent to 105.80% of the CDI Cetip rate for the 1st series and 106.00% per year for the 2nd series, maturing in March and September 2015, respectively, both with early redemption option.
ii. Transnordestina Logística
In March 2010 Transnordestina Logística S.A. obtained approval from the Northeast Development Fund – FDNE for its 1st Private Issue of convertible debentures, consisting of eight series in the total amount of R$2,672,400. The first, third, and fourth series refer to funds to be invested in the Missão Velha – Salgueiro – Trindade and Salgueiro – Porto de Suape module, which also includes the investments in the Suape Port, and the reconstruction of the Cabo to Porto Real de Colégio railroad section. The second, fifth and sixth series refer to funds to be invested in the Eliseu Martins – Trindade module. The seventh and eighth series refer to funds to be invested in the Missão Velha – Pecém module, which also includes the investments in the Pecém Port.
| | Number | | Unit | | | | | | | | Balance (R$) | Series | | Issued | | face value | | Issue | | Maturity | | Charges | | 12/31/2012 | 1st | | 336,647,184 | | R$ 1.00 | | 03/09/10 | | 10/03/27 | | TJLP + 0.85% p.a | | 336,647 | 2nd | | 350,270,386 | | R$ 1.00 | | 11/25/10 | | 10/03/27 | | TJLP + 0.85% p.a | | 350,270 | 3rd | | 338,035,512 | | R$ 1.00 | | 12/01/10 | | 10/03/27 | | TJLP + 0.85% p.a | | 338,036 | 4th | | 468,293,037 | | R$ 1.00 | | 10/04/11 | | 10/03/27 | | TJLP + 0.85% p.a | | 468,293 | 5th | | 121,859,549 | | R$ 1.00 | | 9/21/12 | | 10/03/27 | | TJLP + 0.85% p.a | | 121,860 |
·Guarantees provided
Guarantees provided for the borrowings comprise property, plant and equipment items and sureties, as shown in the table below, and do not include guarantees provided for subsidiaries and jointly controlled entities.
| | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | Property, plant and equipment | | 12,233 | | 19,383 | Collateral transfer (*) | | | | 87,550 | | | 12,233 | | 106,933 | | | | | |
(*) In March 2012 the Company settled the loan guaranteed by a collateral transfer and paid R$89,438.
13. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS I - Identification and measurement of financial instruments The Company enters into transactions involving various financial instruments, mainly cash and cash equivalents, including short-term investments, marketable securities, trade receivables, trade payables, and borrowings and financing. Additionally, itThe Company also carries outenters into derivative transactions, involving derivative financial instruments, especially exchange and interest rate swaps. Considering the nature of these instruments, their fair value is basically determined by the use ofusing Brazil’s money market and mercantile and futures exchange quotations. The amounts recordedrecognized in current assets and current liabilities have immediate liquidity or short-term maturity, mostly less than three months. Considering the maturities and featurescharacteristics of such instruments, their carrying amounts approximate their fair values. ·Classification of financial instruments
| | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Consolidated | | Notes | | Availablefor sale | | Fair valuethrough profit or loss | | Loans andreceivables - effective interest rate | | Otherliabilities - amortizedcost method | | Balances | | Available for sale | | Fair valuethrough profit orloss | | Loans and receivables - effective interest rate | | Other liabilities - amortized cost method | | Ajusted Balances | Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Current | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Cash and cash equivalents | | 4 | | | | | | 7,861,052 | | | | 7,861,052 | | | | | | 8,686,021 | | | | 8,686,021 | Short-term investments - margin deposit | | 5 | | | | | | 763,599 | | | | 763,599 | | | | | | | | | | | Trade receivables | | 6 | | | | | | 1,500,812 | | | | 1,500,812 | | | | | | 1,650,967 | | | | 1,650,967 | Derivative financial instruments | | 8 | | | | 118,592 | | | | | | 118,592 | | | | 174,611 | | | | | | 174,611 | Trading securities | | 8 | | | | 10,778 | | | | | | 10,778 | | | | 13,798 | | | | | | 13,798 | Loans - related parties | | 8 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 517,493 | | | | 517,493 | Total | | | | | | 129,370 | | 10,125,463 | | | | 10,254,833 | | | | 188,409 | | 10,854,481 | | | | 11,042,890 | | Non-current | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Other trade receivables | | 8 | | | | | | 6,877 | | | | 6,877 | | | | | | 1,347 | | | | 1,347 | Investments | | 9 | | 471,674 | | | | | | | | 471,674 | | 1,441,032 | | | | | | | | 1,441,032 | Short-term investments | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 34,874 | | | | 34,874 | Loans - related parties | | 8 | | | | | | 373,214 | | | | 373,214 | | | | | | 117,357 | | | | 117,357 | Total | | | | 471,674 | | | | 380,091 | | | | 851,765 | | 1,441,032 | | | | 153,578 | | | | 1,594,610 | Total assets | | | | 471,674 | | 129,370 | | 10,505,554 | | | | 11,106,598 | | 1,441,032 | | 188,409 | | 11,008,059 | | | | 12,637,500 | | Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Current | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Borrow ings and financing | | 12 | | | | | | | | 1,901,384 | | 1,901,384 | | | | | | | | 3,284,609 | | 3,284,609 | Derivative financial instruments | | 14 | | | | 26,257 | | | | | | 26,257 | | | | 65 | | | | | | 65 | Trade payables | | | | | | | | | | 1,293,008 | | 1,293,008 | | | | | | | | 1,167,826 | | 1,167,826 | Dividends and interest on capital | | | | | | | | | | 464,982 | | 464,982 | | | | | | | | 277,097 | | 277,097 | Total | | | | | | 26,257 | | | | 3,659,374 | | 3,685,631 | | | | 65 | | | | 4,729,532 | | 4,729,597 | | Non-current | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Borrow ings and financing | | 12 | | | | | | | | 32,484,576 | | 32,484,576 | | | | | | | | 27,164,265 | | 27,164,265 | Derivative financial instruments | | 14 | | | | - | | | | | | | | | | 21,301 | | | | | | 21,301 | Total | | | | | | - | | | | 32,484,576 | | 32,484,576 | | | | 21,301 | | | | 27,164,265 | | 27,185,566 | | Total liabilities | | | | | | 26,257 | | | | 36,143,950 | | 36,170,207 | | | | 21,366 | | | | 31,893,797 | | 31,915,163 |
FS-42F-47
·Classification of financial instruments
| | | |
12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | | Notes | | Available-for-sale | | Fair value through profit or loss | | Loans and receivables - effective interest rate | | Other liabilities - amortized cost method | | Balances | | Available-for-sale | | Fair value through profit or loss | | Loans and receivables - effective interest rate | | Other liabilities - amortized cost method | | Balances | | | | | | | | | | | | Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Current assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Cash and cash equivalents | | 4 | | | | | | 14,444,875 | | | | 14,444,875 | | | | | | 15,417,393 | | | | 15,417,393 | Trade receivables, net | | 5 | | | | | | 1,715,079 | | | | 1,715,079 | | | | | | 1,558,997 | | | | 1,558,997 | Guarantee margin on financial instruments | | 7 and 13 | | | | 435,161 | | | | 435,161 | | | | | | 407,467 | | | | 407,467 | Derivative financial instruments | | 7 and 13 | | 239,266 | | | | | | 239,266 | | | | 55,115 | | | | | | 55,115 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Non-current assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Other trade receivables (Note 7) | | | | | | | | 8,983 | | | | 8,983 | | | | | | 57,797 | | | | 57,797 | Investments | | | | 2,336,137 | | | | | | | | 2,336,137 | | 2,089,307 | | | | | | | | 2,089,307 | Derivative financial instruments | | 7 | | | | 8,665 | | | | | | 8,665 | | | | 376,344 | | | | | | 376,344 | Short-term investments | | | | | | | | 116,753 | | | | 116,753 | | | | | | 139,679 | | | | 139,679 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Current liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Borrowings and financing | | 12 | | | | | | | | 2,326,439 | | 2,326,439 | | | | | | | | 2,734,968 | | 2,734,968 | Derivative financial instruments | | 13 and 14 | | 245,692 | | | | | | 245,692 | | | | 2,971 | | | | | | 2,971 | Trade payables | | | | | | | | | | 1,957,789 | | 1,957,789 | | | | | | | | 1,232,075 | | 1,232,075 | Non-current liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Borrowings and financing | | 12 | | | | | | | | 27,958,289 | | 27,958,289 | | | | | | | | 25,331,950 | | 25,331,950 | Derivative financial instruments | | 13 and 14 | | | | | | | | | | | | 373,430 | | | | | | 373,430 |
· Fair value measurement The financial instruments recognized at fair value require the disclosure of fair value measurements in three hierarchy levels.
·Level 1: quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
· �� Level 2: other available inputs, except those of Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, whether directly (i.e., prices) or indirectly (i.e., derived from prices)
·Level 3: inputs unavailable due to slight or no market activity and which is significant for the definition of the fair value of assets.
The following table shows the financial instruments recognized at fair value through profit or loss using a valuation method: |
12/31/2012 | |
12/31/2011 | | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Balances | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Balances | | Consolidated | | | | | | | 12/31/2015 | | | | | | 12/31/2014 | | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Balances | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Balances | Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Current assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Derivative financial instruments | | | | 239,266 | | | | 239,266 | | | | 55,115 | | | | 55,115 | | | | 118,592 | | 118,592 | | | | 174,611 | | 174,611 | Trading securities | | | 10,778 | | | | 10,778 | | 13,798 | | | | 13,798 | Non-current assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Available-for-sale financial assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Investments | | 2,336,137 | | | | | | 2,336,137 | | 2,089,309 | | | | | | 2,089,309 | | 471,674 | | | | 471,674 | | 1,441,032 | | | | 1,441,032 | Derivative financial instruments | | | | 8,665 | | | | 8,665 | | | | 376,344 | | | | 376,344 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total assets | | | 482,452 | | 118,592 | | 601,044 | | 1,454,830 | | 174,611 | | 1,629,441 | Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Current liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Derivative financial instruments | | | | 245,692 | | | | 245,692 | | | | 2,971 | | | | 2,971 | | | | 26,257 | | 26,257 | | | | 65 | | 65 | Non-current liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Derivative financial instruments | | | | | | | | | | | | 373,430 | | | | 373,430 | | | | | | | | | | 21,301 | | 21,301 | Total liabilities | | | | | 26,257 | | 26,257 | | | | 21,366 | | 21,366 |
Level 1: quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2: Includes observable inputs in market such as interest rates, exchange etc., but not prices traded in active markets. There are no assets and liabilities classified as level 3.
II – investmentsInvestments in financial instruments classified as available for saleavailable-for-sale and measured at fair value through OCI These consistConsist mainly of investments in shares acquired in Brazil involving companies considered as top ranked companies,by the Company, which are recognized in non-currentnoncurrent assets, and any gains or losses are recognized in shareholders' equity, where they will remain until actual realization of the securities or when any loss is considered unrecoverable.
FS-43
Potential impairment of available-for-sale financial assets classified as available for sale Potential impairment of available-for-sale financial assets The Company has investments in common (USIM3) and preferred (USIM5) shares of Usiminas (“Usiminas Shares”), designated as available-for-sale financial assets as they doassets. The Company adopts this designation because the nature of the investment is not meet the criteria to be classified withincomprised in any of the other categories of financial instruments (loans and receivables, held-to-maturity investments or financial assets at fair value through profit or loss). The asset is classified as a non-current asset underin line item “investments” and is carried at fair value based on the quoted price on the stock exchange (BM&FBOVESPA). According to the Company's policy, the gains and losses arising from changes in the price of shares are recorded directly in equity, as other comprehensive income. Considering the volatility of the quotations of Usiminas shares, the Company evaluated whether, at the end of the reporting period, there was objective evidence of impairment of these financial assets, i.e., the Company’s management evaluated if the decline in the market value of Usiminas shares should be considered either significant or prolonged. In turn, this valuationThe Company's accounting policy requires judgment based on CSN’s policy, prepared according to practices used in the domestic and international markets, and consists of an instrument by instrumenta quarterly analysis based on quantitative and qualitative information available in the market from the time anmoment the instrument showsdemonstrates a drop of more than 20% or more in itsof their market value or
from the time there is a significant drop in its market value as compared to itstheir acquisition price duringcost for more than twelve12 months. To determine If the period of declineCompany concludes that there was a significant drop in the market valueprice of the instrument, an impairment loss must be recognized. In 2012,considering the price of Usiminas shares below their cost, CSN compared their average cost of acquisition ason the BM&FBovespa, was recorded the first impairment loss on that shares. According to this policy, whenever the share price reached a level lower than the last record impairment, the Company should record further losses, redefining the new minimum threshold value of the reporting date withshares.
F-48
In the year 2015 there was a reduction in the price of the shares to the level of the last date whenrecorded loss, therefore, the maximum quotation was above this weighted average. AccordingCompany recorded the new losses to management, this analysis shows that neither USIM3 shares nor USIM5 shares presented a prolonged decline in their quotations, based on the Company’s policy. To determine the decline percentage, we have analyzed volatility, which represents a dispersion measure of a share or market index returns. The more a share price varies over a short period of time, the higher is the risk of financial gain or loss if the share is traded and, therefore, volatility is a risk measure. The historical volatility of a share is calculated and taken into account to identify the expected fluctuation of the related instrument and measure the expected future volatility of the assessed equity instrument, and conclude if an instrument’s market value decline below its cost should or not be considered significant.
The table below illustrates this index for a twelve-year period (as from December 31, 2011), a sufficiently long period to eliminate volatility peaks caused by domestic and international economic crises:
Periods: | Volatility | | USIM3 | USIM5 | 01/03/2000 to 12/31/2011 | 50.42% | 48.57% |
Based on this information, the criteria adopted by management, and the relevant accounting policies and legal rules, management concluded that the declineincome statement in the market value as compared to the acquisition costamount of the USIM3 and USIM5 shares as of June 30, 2012, of 66.3% and 59.0%, respectively, should be considered a significant declineR$ 555,298, in the market value of these equity instruments.
Based on the qualitative and quantitative elements presented above, management concluded, in its best judgment, that there was evidence of a significant impairment of the investment in Usiminas shares as of June 30, 2012, and, consequently, reclassified the accumulated losses recorded in other comprehensive income amounting to R$1,599,485, net of income tax and social contribution, to profit for the year, by recognizing R$2,022,793 inline item other operating expenses and constituted the total of R$423,308 in 33,269 as deferred taxes.
Beginning from that date , pursuant to a Company's policy, gains arising from the positive variationThe market value of the quotationshares was lower than the base price of the last impairment, as follows:
Class of shares | | Quantity | | Stock Exchange Market price(BM&FBovespa) | | | Share Market Price of last impairment recorded in 2014 | | 03/31/2015 | | 06/30/2015 | | 09/30/2015 | | 12/31/2015 | Common | | 71,390,300 | | 6.64 | | | | | | | | 4.02 | Preferred | | 105,215,700 | | 5.05 | | 4.97 | | 4.12 | | 3.35 | | 1.55 | | | 176,606,000 | | | | | | | | | | |
The change in the carrying amount of Usiminas is presented below: | | | | | 12/31/2014 | | 12/31/2015 | | Market Variation as of 2015 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Class of shares | | Quantity | | Share price |
| Closing Balance |
| Share price | | Closing Balance | | Share price | | Closing Balance | Common | | 71,390,300 | | 12.30 | | 878,101 | | 4.02 | | 286,989 | | (8.28) | | (591,112) | Preferred | | 105,215,700 | | 5.05 | | 531,339 | | 1.55 | | 163,084 | | (3.50) | | (368,255) | | | 176,606,000 | | | | 1,409,440 | | | | 450,073 | | | | (959,367) |
The negative variation in the price of shares during the second six month-period ended December 31, 2012on 2015 amounting to R$730,812, net of income tax and social contribution,959,367 were recognized in other comprehensive income, netoffsetting the gain that was recorded as of income tax.December 31, 2014 amounting to R$ 404,069. Subsequently, the loss of R$555,298 was recoded in profit/loss, in line item other operating expenses. In addition, refer to reconciliation below:
Class of shares | | Quantity | | Share price basis for impairment | | Accounting balance basis for impairment | | Impairment Loss | | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | 2015 | Common | | 71,390,300 | | 6.64 | | 4.02 | | 474,032 | | 286,989 | | (187,043) | Preferred | | 105,215,700 | | 5.05 | | 1.55 | | 531,339 | | 163,084 | | (368,255) | | | 176,606,000 | | | | | | 1,005,371 | | 450,073 | | (555,298) |
·Share market price risks In December 2012 there was an additional recognitionThe Company is exposed to the risk of R$264,441 related to deferred taxes on accumulated losseschanges in share prices due to the annual analysis ofinvestments made and classified as available-for-sale.
According to the effective income tax and social contribution rate that took into considerationCompany’s accounting policies, any negative changes in thetemporary differences generated by this investment in CSN subsidiaries resulting fromUsiminas considered significant (impairment) are recognized in profit or loss, and positive changes are recognized in comprehensive income until the reclassificationinvestment is realized. As of accumulated losses.December 2015, the amount recognized in comprehensive income for investments available for sale, net of taxes is R$(73). FS-44F-49
The Company continues to evaluate strategic alternatives with respect to its investment in Usiminas. These initiatives can impact, for example, the way an investment is recorded in the Company’s financial statements.
III – Fair values of assets and liabilities as compared to their carrying amounts Financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss are recognized in current and non-current assets and liabilities, and any gains and possible losses are recognized as finance income or finance costs, respectively.
The amounts are recognized in the financial statements at their carrying amounts, which are substantially similar to those that would be obtained if they were traded in the market. The fair values of other long-term assets and liabilities do not differ significantly from their carrying amounts, except the amounts below.
The estimated fair values of consolidated long-term borrowings and financing were calculated at prevailing market rates, taking into consideration the nature, terms and risks similar to those of the recorded contracts, as compared below:
| | | 12/31/2012 | | | | 12/31/2011 | | Carrying amount | | Fair value | | Carrying amount | | Fair value | Perpetual bonds | 2,046,281 | | 2,102,366 | | 1,878,353 | | 1,819,903 | Fixed rate notes | 6,067,555 | | 6,811,081 | | 5,183,690 | | 5,832,364 |
IV- Financial risk management policy
The Company has and follows a policy of managing its risks, with guidelines regarding the risks incurred by the company. Pursuant to this policy, the nature and general position of financial risks are regularly monitored and managed in order to assess the results and the financial impact on cash flow. The credit limits and the quality of counterparties’ hedgehedging instruments are also periodically reviewed. The risk management policy was established by the Board of Directors. Under this policy, market risks are hedged when it is considered necessary to support the corporate strategy or when it is necessary to maintain a level of financial flexibility.
Under the terms of the risk management policy, the Company manages some risks by using derivative financial instruments. The Company’s risk policy prohibits any speculative deals or short sales. 13.a) Foreign exchange and interest rate risks
· Exchange rate risk The exposure arises from the existence of assets and liabilities generated in US dollars or Euro and is denominated natural currency exposure. Net exposure is the result of offsetting the natural currency exposure by hedging instruments adopted by CSN. The consolidated net exposure as of December 31, 2015 is as follows: | | | | 12/31/2015 | Foreign Exchange Exposure | | (Amounts in US$’000) | | (Amounts in €’000) | Cash and cash equivalents overseas | 1,625,202 | | 5,197 | Trade receivables | | 169,511 | | 7,258 | Other assets | | 57 | | 20,743 | Total assets | | 1,794,770 | | 33,198 | Borrowings and financing | | (4,569,415) | | (121,989) | Trade payables | | (20,195) | | (4,944) | Other liabilities | | (25,005) | | (92,363) | Total liabilities | | (4,614,615) | | (219,296) | Foreign exchange exposure | | (2,819,845) | | (186,098) | Notional amount of derivatives contracted, net | 1,435,000 | | | Cash flow hedge accounting | | 1,557,667 | | | Net Investment hedge accounting | | | | 120,000 | Net foreign exchange exposure | 172,822 | | (66,098) |
·Interest rate risk Risk arises from short and long term liabilities with fixed or post fixed interest rates and inflation rates. Item 13 b) shows the derivatives and hedging strategies to protect exchange and interest rates risks. F-50
13.b) Hedging instruments: derivatives and hedge accounting
CSN uses several instruments for protection of foreign currency risk and interest rate risk, as shown in the following topics: ·Portfolio of derivative financial instruments Forward exchange rate contracts As part of the hedging strategy of natural exposure to dollar, CSN contracts foreign exchange derivative instruments. As of December 31, 2015 the Company held in its portfolio forward dollar contracts traded at BM&F Bovespa which totaled the notional amount of US$ 1.435 billion. These contracts consist in negotiating the exchange rate of Reais to US dollar, for prompt delivery, contracted under Resolution 1.690/90 of the National Monetary Council (CMN) in standard contracts established by BM&F Bovespa. CSN determines the required volume of currency to be purchased in accordance with its foreign exchange management strategy and negotiates a sufficient volume of contracts to achieve this financial volume. The maturity of the portfolio always occurs on the first business day of the contract´s maturity month, being renewable every 30 days, in average. The contract settlement is exclusively financial, on the due date and occurs daily until the maturity. The position held by the Company is set at the end of each session based on the difference of the day's settlement price (D0) compared to the previous day price (D-1), and is settled on the following day (D+1), according to the rules of BM&F. For as much as the Company maintains contracts traded on the BM&F Bovespa, it is required by the clearing house a guarantee margin to cover those commitments in these contracts, which is only a percentage of the contract´s total amount. CSN maintains securities linked to this guarantee margin, consisting mainly of government bonds, which will be redeemed after the end position. The amounts of these investments are described in Note 5. F-51
The contracts on the BM&F Bovespa have been carried out to replace the foreign exchange swap contracts (NDF - Non Deliverable Forward) traded in over the counter markets. Dollar x Euro swap The subsidiary Lusosider has derivative transactions to protect its dollar exposure versus euro. Fixed rate-to-CDI swap The purpose of this transaction is to peg obligations subject to a fixed rate to interest rates based on the average rate of interbank deposits of one day (CDI), calculated and disclosed by CETIP. Basically, the Company contracted swaps for its obligations indexed to fixed rates, in which it receives interest on the notional amount (long position) and pays a 100% of the certificate of deposit interbank - CDI (pre-fixed rate) on the notional amount of the contract date (short position). The gains and losses on this contract are directly related to CDI fluctuations. In general, these are transactions conducted in the Brazilian over-the-counter market that have as counterparty a prime financial institution. CDI-to-Fixed rate swap The purpose of this transaction is to peg obligations subject to a post-fixed rate (CDI) to a fixed rate. Basically, the Company contracted swaps for its obligations indexed to CDI, in which it receives interest on the notional amount (long position) and pays a pre-fixed rate on the notional amount of the contract date (short position). The gains and losses on this contract are directly related to CDI fluctuations. In general, these are transactions conducted in the Brazilian over-the-counter market that have as counterparty a prime financial institution. Classification of the derivatives in the balance sheet and statement of income | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/31/2015 | Designation | | Assets | | Liabilities | | Impact on | Date | | Current | | Non-current | | Total | | Current | | Non-current | | Total | | shareholders’ | Dollar - to-CDI swap | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (18) | Dollar- to- real swap (NDF) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 785,702 | Forward dollar | | 110,075 | | | | 110,075 | | | | | | | | 25,381 | Dollar- to- euro swap (NDF) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 39,668 | Dollar - to- euro swap | | 7,647 | | | | 7,647 | | | | | | | | (4,405) | Fixed rate- to- CDI swap | | | | | | | | 26,257 | | | | 26,257 | | (4,956) | CDI -to- fixed rate swap | | 870 | | | | 870 | | | | | | | | 870 | | | 118,592 | | | | 118,592 | | 26,257 | | | | 26,257 | | 842,242 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/31/2014 | Designation | | | | Assets | | | | | | Liabilities | | | | Impact on | Date | | Current | | Non-current | | Total | | Current | | Non-current | | Total | | shareholders’ | Dollar - to-CDI swap | | 5,346 | | | | 5,346 | | | | | | | | (12,735) | Dollar- to- real swap (NDF) | | 153,316 | | | | 153,316 | | 65 | | | | 65 | | 213,602 | Dollar- to- euro swap (NDF) | | 6,722 | | | | 6,722 | | | | | | | | 33,397 | Dollar - to- euro swap | | 9,227 | | | | 9,227 | | | | | | | | 8,605 | Fixed rate- to- CDI swap | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (943) | CDI -to- fixed rate swap | | | | | | | | | | 21,301 | | 21,301 | | (3,926) | | | 174,611 | | - | | 174,611 | | 65 | | 21,301 | | 21,366 | | 238,000 |
·Hedge accounting – cash flow
Beginning November 1, 2014, the Company formally designated cash flow hedging relationships to protect highly probable future cash flows against US dollar fluctuations. In order to better reflect the accounting impacts of this foreign exchange hedging strategy on its profit, CSN designated part of its US dollar-denominated liabilities as a hedging instrument of its future exports. As a result, foreign exchange differences arising on translating the designated liabilities will be temporarily recognized in shareholders’ equity and allocated to profit or loss when such exports are carried out, which will allow recognizing the US dollar impact on liabilities and exports concurrently. Note that adopting hedge accounting does not entail contracting any financial instrument. As ofDecember 31, 2015 the Company designated for hedge accounting US$1,558 million in exports to be carried out between October, 2016 and October, 2022. F-52
To support these designated amounts, the Company prepared formal documentation indicating how hedging is aligned with the goal and strategy of CSN’s Risk Management Policy by identifying the hedging instruments used, the hedging purpose, the nature of the hedged risk, and showing the expected high effectiveness of the designated relationships. The designated debt instruments total an amount equivalent to the portion of future exports. Thus, the exchange differences on translating the instrument and the hedged item are similar. According to the Company’s accounting policy, continuous assessments of the prospective and retrospective effectiveness must be carried out by comparing the designated amounts with the expected amounts, approved in Management’s budgets, and the actual export amounts. Through hedge accounting, the exchange gains and losses of the debt instruments do not immediately affect the Company’s profit or loss except to the extent that exports are carried out. The table below shows a summary of the hedging relationships as of December 31, 2015: (1)During the third quarter 2015, we reviewed the future export projections and identified that the amount of US$ 9 million designated previously were not highly probable. According to internal policy, the hedge relationship was discontinued prospectively, since the resume of exports in future periods is possible. (2)On October, 2015 was settled the portion of debt designated as a hedge instrument. Therefore, we revert to the profit/loss the accumulated exchange rate variation related this installment. In the hedging relationships described above, the amounts of the debt instruments were fully designated for equivalent iron ore export portions. F-53
The movements in the hedge accounting amounts recognized in shareholders’ equity as of December 31, 2015 are as follows: | 12/31/2014 | | Addition | | Reversal | | 12/31/2015 | Cash flow hedge accounting | 120,633 | | 1,410,896 | | (11,439) | | 1,520,090 | Income tax and social contribution on cash flow hedge accounting | (41,015) | | (479,705) | | 3,889 | | (516,831) | Not recorded Income tax and social contribution on cash flow hedge accounting | | | 357,951 | | | | 357,951 | Fair value of cash flow hedge, net of taxes | 79,618 | | 1,289,142 | | (7,550) | | 1,361,210 |
As of December 31, 2015 the hedging relationships established by the Company were effective, according to the prospective tests conducted. Thus, no reversal for hedge accounting ineffectiveness was recognized. ·Hedge of net investment in foreign subsidiaries CSN has natural foreign exchange exposure in euros arising significantly from loan made by a subsidiary abroad with functional currency in Reais, for the acquisition of investments abroad whose functional currency is Euro. Such exposure arises from converting the balance sheets of these subsidiaries for consolidation in CSN, and the exchange rate of the loans affected the income statement in the financial result item and exchange variation of the net assets of the foreign operation directly affected the equity in other comprehensive income. As from 1 September 2015 CSN began to adopt hedge of net investment to eliminate exposure in order to cover future fluctuations of the euro on such loans. Non-derivative financial liabilities have been designated represented by loan agreements with financial institutions in the amount of € 120 million. The carrying amounts as of December 31, 2015 are: | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/31/2015 | Designation Date | | Hedging Instrument | | Hedged Item | | Type of Hedged Risk | | Exchange Rate on designation | | Designated amounts (EUR'000) | | Impact on shareholders' equity | 09/01/2015 | | Non-derivative financial liabilities in EUR – Debt contract | | Investments in subsidiaries which EUR is the functional currency | | Foreign exchange - R$ vs. EUR spot rate | | 4.0825 | | 120,000 | | (20,148) | Total | | | | | | | | | | 120,000 | | (20,148) |
Changes in amounts related to hedge of net investment recorded in equity as of December 31 2015 is presented below: | 12/31/2014 | | Addition | | Reversal | | 12/31/2015 | Net investment hedge in foreign operations | | | 20,148 | | | | 20,148 | Fair value of net investment hedge in foreign operations | | | 20,148 | | | | 20,148 |
On December 31, 2015 hedge relationships established by the Company found to be effective, according to prospective tests. Therefore, no reversal by ineffectiveness of the hedge was recorded. 13.c) Sensitivity analysis We present below the sensitivity analysis for currency risk and interest rate. ·Sensitivity analysis of Derivative Financial Instruments and consolidated Foreign Exchange Exposure The Company considered scenarios 1 and 2 as 25% and 50% of deterioration for volatility of the currency, using as reference the closing exchange rate as of December 31, 2015. The currencies used in the sensitivity analysis and its scenarios are shown below: F-54
| | | | | | | | 12/31/2015 | Currency | | Exchange rate | | Probable scenario | | Scenario 1 | | Scenario 2 | USD | | 3.9048 | | 3.9116 | | 4.8810 | | 5.8572 | EUR | | 4.2504 | | 4.2359 | | 5.3130 | | 6.3756 | USD x EUR | | 1.0887 | | 1.0856 | | 1.3609 | | 1.6331 |
| | | | | | 12/31/2015 | Interest | | Interest rate | | Scenario 1 | | Scenario 2 | CDI | | 14.14% | | 18.87% | | 22.64% |
(*) The effects on income statement, considering both scenarios are shown below: | | | | | | | | | | 12/31/2015 | Instruments | | Notional amount | | Risk | | Probable scenario (*) | | Scenario 1 | | Scenario 2 | | | | | | | | | | | | Future dólar | | 1,435,000 | | Dólar | | 9,758 | | 1,400,847 | | 2,801,694 | | | | | | | | | | | | Hedge accounting of exports | | 1,557,667 | | Dólar | | 10,592 | | 1,520,595 | | 3,041,190 | | | | | | | | | | | | Currency position | | (2,819,845) | | Dólar | | (19,175) | | (2,752,733) | | (5,505,466) | (not including exchange derivatives above) | | | | | | | | | | | Consolidated exchange position | | 172,822 | | Dólar | | 1,175 | | 168,709 | | 337,418 | (including exchange derivatives above) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Hedge of net investments in foreign operations | | 120,000 | | Euro | | (1,740) | | 127,511 | | 255,022 | | | | | | | | | | | | Currency position | | (186,098) | | Euro | | 2,698 | | (197,747) | | (395,494) | Consolidated exchange position | | (66,098) | | Euro | | 958 | | (70,236) | | (140,472) | (including exchange derivatives above) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Dollar-to-euro swap | | 58,150 | | Dólar | | 152,522 | | (10,682) | | (17,804) |
(*) The likely scenarios were calculated considering the following changes to the risks: Real x Dollar - Real depreciation of 0.17% / Real x Euro – Real depreciation of 0.34% / Dollar x Euro - Dollar depreciation of 0.28%. Source: prices Banco Central do Brasil and Central Bank of Europe in March 2, 2016. ·Sensitivity analysis of interest rate swaps | | | | | | | | | | 12/31/2015 | Instruments | | Notional amount | | Risk | | Probable scenario (*) | | Scenario 1 | | Scenario 2 | Fixed rate-to-CDI interest rate swap | | 345,000 | | CDI | | (26,257) | | (5,456) | | (10,806) | Dollar-to-CDI interest rate swap | | 150,000 | | CDI | | 870 | | 2,208 | | 4,375 |
(*) The sensitivity analysis is based on the assumption of maintaining as probable scenario the market values as of December 31, 2015 recognized in the company's assets and liabilities. F-55
·Sensitivity analysis of changes in interest rates The Company considered the scenarios 1, and 2 as 25% and 50% of evolution for volatility of the interest as of December 31, 2015. | | | | | | Impact on profit or loss | Changes in interest rates | | % Yearly | | Probable scenario(*) | | Scenario 1 | | Scenario 2 | | TJLP | | 7.00 | | (43,325) | | (18,466) | | (36,932) | | Libor | | 0.85 | | (449,052) | | (13,775) | | (27,550) | | CDI | | 14.14 | | (1,359,986) | | (446,791) | | (893,582) | |
(*) The sensitivity analysis is based on the assumption of maintaining as probable scenario the market values at December 31, 2015 recorded in the Company´s assets and liabilities. 13.d) Liquidity risk It is the risk that the Company may not have sufficient net funds to honor its financial commitments as a result of mismatching of terms or volumes between scheduled receipts and payments. To manage cash liquidity in domestic and foreign currency, assumptions of future disbursements and receipts are established and daily monitored by the treasury area. The payment schedules for the long-term portions of borrowings, financing and debentures are shown in note 12. The following table shows the contractual maturities of financial liabilities, including accrued interestinterest. At December 31, 2015 | | Less than one year | | From one to two years | | From two to five years | | Over five years | | Total | Borrowings, financing and debentures | | 1,901,384 | | 7,238,130 | | 18,674,574 | | 6,571,872 | | 34,385,960 | Derivative financial instruments | | 26,257 | | | | | | | | 26,257 | Trade payables | | 1,293,008 | | | | | | | | 1,293,008 | Dividends and interest on capital | | 464,982 | | | | | | | | 464,982 |
·Fair values of assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2012. compared to their carrying amounts Financial assets and liabilities at fair value through profit or loss are recognized in current and non-current assets and liabilities, and any gains and losses are recognized as finance income or finance costs, respectively. The amounts are recognized in the financial statements at their carrying amounts, which are substantially similar to those that would be obtained if they were traded in the market. The fair values of other long-term assets and liabilities do not differ significantly from their carrying amounts, except the amounts below. The estimated fair values for certain consolidated long-term borrowings and financing were calculated at prevailing market rates, taking into consideration the nature, terms and risks similar to those of the recorded contracts, as compared below: At December 31, 2012 | Less than one year | | From one to two years | | From two to five years | | Over five years | | Total | Borrowings, financing and debentures | 2,326,439 | | 6,803,471 | | 10,538,367 | | 10,616,451 | | 30,284,728 | Derivative financial instruments | 245,692 | | | | | | | | 245,692 | Trade payables | 1,957,789 | | | | | | | | 1,957,789 | | | | | | | | | | | At December 31, 2011 | | | | | | | | | | Borrowings, financing and debentures | 2,734,968 | | 2,263,889 | | 6,724,483 | | 16,343,578 | | 28,066,918 | Derivative financial instruments | 2,971 | | 373,430 | | | | | | 376,401 | Trade payables | 1,232,075 | | | | | | | | 1,232,075 |
| | | | 12/31/2015 | | | | 12/31/2014 | | | Carrying amount | | Fair value | | Carrying amount | | Fair value | Perpetual bonds | | 3,910,115 | | 1,330,685 | | 2,659,815 | | 1,974,031 | Fixed rate notes | | 7,086,760 | | 3,915,310 | | 6,232,986 | | 6,267,272 |
FS-45F-56
· Foreign exchange rate risk
The Company assesses its exchange exposure by subtracting its liabilities from its assets denominated in dollar, euro and Australian dollar, thus arriving at its net exchange exposure, which is the foreign currency exposure risk. Therefore, besides the trade receivables arising from exports and investments overseas that in economic terms constitute natural hedges, the Company further considers and uses various financial instruments, such as derivative instruments (US$ to real and euro to dollar swaps, and forward exchange contracts, etc.) to manage its risks of fluctuations in currencies other than the Brazilian real.
·Policies on the use of hedging derivatives
The Company’s financial policy reflects the parameters of liquidity, credit and market risks approved by the Audit Committee and Board of Directors. The use of derivative instruments in order to prevent fluctuations in interest and exchange rates from having a negative impact on the company’s balance sheet and income statement should consider the same parameters. As provided for in internal rules, this financial investment policy has been approved and is being managed by the finance officers.
At the meetings of the Executive Officers and Board of Directors, the officers and directors routinely present and discuss the Company’s financial positions. Under the bylaws, transactions involving material amounts require the prior approval of management bodies. The use of other derivative instruments is contingent upon the express prior approval of the Board of Directors.
To finance its activities, the Company resorts to the capital markets, both locally and internationally, and based on the indebtedness profile it is seeking, part of the debt is pegged to foreign currency, basically to the US dollar, which causes Management to seek hedging for debt through derivative financial instruments.
To contract derivative financial instruments for hedging within the internal control structure, the following policies are adopted:
·ongoing calculation of exchange exposure that occurs by analyzing assets and liabilities exposed to foreign currency, under the following terms: (i) trade receivables and payables in foreign currency; (ii) cash and cash equivalents and debts in foreign currency considering the maturity of the assets and liabilities exposed to exchange fluctuations;
·presentation of the financial position and exchange exposure on a routine basis of meetings of the Executive Officers and Board of Directors that approve the hedging strategy;
·carrying out derivative hedging transactions only with leading banks, diluting the credit risk through diversification among these banks;
FS-46
The consolidated net exposure as of December 31, 2012 is as follows:
| | | | | | 12/31/2012 | | | Foreign Exchange Exposure | | (Amounts in US$ thousand) | | (Amounts in € thousand) | | | Cash and cash equivalents overseas | | 6,106,055 | | 2,551 | | | Derivative guarantee margin | | 200,296 | | | | | Trade receivables | | 348,361 | | 32,298 | | | Intercompany borrowings | | 61,628 | | 92,322 | | | Advances to suppliers | | 11,639 | | 592 | | | Other assets | | 3,478 | | 37,118 | | | Total assets | | 6,731,457 | | 164,881 | | | Borrowings and financing | | (5,102,672) | | (120,869) | | | Trade payables | | (267,371) | | (52) | | | Other liabilities | | (36,951) | | | | | Intercompany borrowings | | (13,997) | | | | | Total liabilities | | (5,420,991) | | (120,921) | | | Gross exposure | | 1,310,466 | | 43,960 | | | Notional amount of derivatives contracted | | 66,557 | | (90,000) | | | Net exposure | | 1,377,023 | | (46,040) | | | | | | | |
Gains and losses on these transactions are consistent with the policies and strategies defined by management.
·Exchange swap transactions
The Company carries out exchange swap transactions in order to hedge its assets and liabilities against any fluctuations in the US dollar-real parity. This hedge through exchange swaps provides the Company, through the long position of the contract, with a forward rate agreement (FRA) gain on the exchange coupon, which at the same time improves our investment rates and reduces the cost of our funding in the international market.
As of December 31, 2012, the Company had a long position in exchange swap of US$10,000,000 (US$367,856,000 as of December 31, 2011) where we received, in the long position, exchange rate change plus 3.5% per year on average (in 2011, exchange rate change plus 3.4541% per year), and paid 100% of CDI, in the short position of the exchange swap contract.
As of December 31, 2011 the Company had a short position in a foreign exchange swap of US$100,000.000, where we paid, in the short position, exchange rate change plus interest of 2.39% per year.
As of December 31, 2012, the consolidated position of these contracts is as follows:
FS-47
·US dollar-to-real exchange swap
| | | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | | | | | | | Appreciation (R$) | | Fair value (market) | | | | Appreciation (R$) | | Fair value (market) | Counterparties | | Transaction maturity | | Notional amount (US$ thousand) | | Asset position | | Liability position | | Amounts receivable/ (payable) | | Notional amount (US$ thousand) | | Asset position | | Liability position | | Amounts receivable/ (payable) | HSBC | | 6/17/2013 | | 3,327 | | 6,865 | | (6,992) | | (127) | | 101,317 | | 192,919 | | (176,554) | | 16,365 | Bradesco | | 5/13/2013 to 7/1/2013 | | 14,971 | | 30,961 | | (31,101) | | (140) | | 3,327 | | 6,279 | | (5,743) | | 536 | Banco do Brasil | | 1/2/2013 | | 3,327 | | 6,885 | | (6,447) | | 438 | | 6,654 | | 12,605 | | (12,413) | | 192 | Santander | | 10/1/2013 to 1/2/2015 | | 14,990 | | 33,115 | | (30,061) | | 3,054 | | 14,990 | | 28,900 | | (28,416) | | 484 | Goldman Sachs | | 1/2/2013 | | 3,327 | | 6,880 | | (6,457) | | 423 | | 190,000 | | 371,174 | | (352,514) | | 18,660 | Banco de Tokyo | | 12/15/2016 | | 24,952 | | 54,634 | | (49,147) | | 5,487 | | 24,952 | | 46,980 | | (47,960) | | (980) | JP Morgan | | 12/16/2013 | | 1,663 | | 3,401 | | (3,490) | | (89) | | 9,981 | | 19,127 | | (18,556) | | 571 | Société Générale | | | | | | | | | | | | 16,635 | | 30,554 | | (29,362) | | 1,192 | | | | | 66,557 | | 142,741 | | (133,695) | | 9,046 | | 367,856 | | 708,538 | | (671,518) | | 37,020 |
·Real-to-US dollar exchange swap
| | | | | | | | 12/31/2011 | | | Notional amount (US$ thousand) | | Appreciation (R$) | | Fair value (market) | Counterparties | | | Asset position | | Liability position | | Amount (payable) | Goldman Sachs | | (70,000) | | 130,266 | | (130,787) | | (521) | Santander | | (30,000) | | 55,704 | | (56,030) | | (326) | | | (100,000) | | 185,970 | | (186,817) | | (847) | | | | | | | | | |
The position of outstanding transactions was recorded in the Company’s assets amounting to R$9,046as of December 31,2012(R$37,020in assets and R$847 in liabilities as of December 31,2011) and its effects are recognized in the Company’s finance income (costs) as a gain totaling R$17,065 for 2012(loss of R$115,490 for 2011), of which R$8,019 refers to settled transactions (see Note 25).
·Euro-to-US dollar exchange swap
In addition to the swaps above, the Company also contracted NDFs (non-deliverable forwards) to hedge its euro-denominated assets. Basically the Company contracted financial derivatives for its euro-denominated assets, where it will receive the difference between the US dollar exchange rate change for the period, multiplied by the notional amount (long position) and pay the difference between the exchange rate change in euro for the period on the notional euro amount on the contract date (short position). In general, these are transactions conducted in the Brazilian over-the-counter market that have as counterparties prime financial institutions, contracted under the exclusive funds.
FS-48
As at December 31, 2012, the consolidated position of these contracts is as follows:
| | | | | | 12/31/2012 | | | | 12/31/2011 | | | | | | | Appreciation (R$) | | Fair value (market) | | | | Appreciation (R$) | | Fair value (market) | Counterparties | | Transaction maturity | | Notional amount (€ thousand) | | Asset position | | Liability position | | Amount (payable) | | Notional amount (€ thousand) | | Asset position | | Liability position | | Amount receivable | Itaú BBA | | 10/1/2013 | | 40,000 | | 51,793 | | (52,876) | | (1,083) | | | | | | | | | HSBC | | 10/1/2013 | | 25,000 | | 32,373 | | (33,047) | | (674) | | 25,000 | | 51,469 | | (48,556) | | 2,913 | Goldman Sachs | | 10/1/2013 | | 25,000 | | 32,363 | | (33,047) | | (684) | | 40,000 | | 128,761 | | (121,389) | | 7,372 | Deutsche Bank | | | | | | | | | | | | 25,000 | | 51,521 | | (48,556) | | 2,965 | | | | | 90,000 | | 116,529 | | (118,970) | | (2,441) | | 90,000 | | 231,751 | | (218,501) | | 13,250 |
The position of outstanding transactions was recorded in the Company’s liabilities amounting to R$2,441 as of December 31, 2012 (R$13,250in assets as of December 31, 2011) and its effects are recognized in the Company’s finance income (costs) as a loss totaling R$5,116for 2012 (gain of R$9,574for 2011), of which R$2,675 refers to transactions already settled (see Note 25).
·US dollar-to-Euro exchange swap
The subsidiary Lusosider carries out transactions with derivatives to hedge its exposure against the euro-dollar fluctuation. As of December 31, 2012, the gross position was US$6,162 and the net position was US$38,230 (including the derivatives below).
| | | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | | | | | Notional amount (US$ thousand) | | Appreciation (R$) | | Fair value (market) | | Notional amount (US$ thousand) | | Appreciation (R$) | | Fair value (market) | Counterparties | | Transaction maturity | | | Asset position | | Liability position | | Amount receivable | | | Asset position | | Liability position | | Amount receivable | BES | | 9/28/2013 | | 44,392 | | 90,687 | | (94,928) | | (4,241) | | 20,208 | | 38,017 | | (34,049) | | 3,968 | BNP | | | | | | | | | | | | 15,000 | | 28,219 | | (25,453) | | 2,766 | | | | | 44,392 | | 90,687 | | (94,928) | | (4,241) | | 35,208 | | 66,236 | | (59,502) | | 6,734 |
The position of outstanding transactions was recorded in the Company’s liabilities amounting to R$4,241as of December 31, 2012 (R$6,734 in assets as of December 31, 2011) and its consolidated results recognized in the finance income (costs) as a loss totaling R$8,065 for 2012 (gain of R$16,501 for 2011), of which R$3,824 refers to transactions already settled (see Note 25).
·Yen-to-US dollar exchange swap
| | | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | | | | | Notional amount (yen) | | Accounting position | | Fair value (market) | | Notional amount (yen) | | Accounting position | | Fair value (market) | Counterparties | | Transaction maturity | | | Asset position | | Liability position | | Amount receivable | | | Asset position | | Liability position | | Amount receivable | Deutsche Bank | | 12/12/2013 | | 59,090,000 | | 237,525 | | (236,964) | | 561 | | 59,090,000 | | 374,455 | | (373,430) | | 1,025 | | | | | 59,090,000 | | 237,525 | | (236,964) | | 561 | | 59,090,000 | | 374,455 | | (373,430) | | 1,025 |
The net effects were recognized in the finance income (costs) as a gain amounting to R$307 for 2012 (gain of R$1,460 for 2011).
·Sensitivity analysis of the US dollar-to-real exchange swap
The sensitivity analysis is based on the assumption of maintaining, as a probable scenario, the fair values as of December 31, 2012 recognized in assets, amounting to R$9,046. The Company considered the scenarios below for the real-dollar parity volatility.
FS-49
- Scenario 1: (25% real appreciation) R$-US$ parity of 1.5326;
- Scenario 2: (50% real appreciation) R$-US$ parity of 1.0218;
- Scenario 3: (25% real depreciation) R$-US$ parity of 2.5544;
- Scenario 4: (50% real depreciation) R$-US$ parity of 3.0653.
| | | | | | | | | | | | 12/31/2012 | | | Risk | | Notional amount (US$ thousand) | | Scenario 1 | | Scenario 2 | | Scenario 3 | | Scenario 4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2.0435 | | 1.5326 | | 1.0218 | | 2.5544 | | 3.0653 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net currency swap | | US dollar fluctuation | | 66,557 | | (34,002) | | (68,005) | | 34,002 | | 68,005 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Exchange exposure in functional currency R$ | | US dollar fluctuation | | 1,310,466 | | (669,484) | | (1,338,969) | | 669,484 | | 1,338,969 | (not including exchange derivatives above) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Consolidated exchange exposure | | US dollar fluctuation | | 1,377,023 | | (703,486) | | (1,406,974) | | 703,486 | | 1,406,974 | (including exchange derivatives above) |
·Sensitivity analysis of the euro-to-dollar exchange swap
The sensitivity analysis is based on the assumption of maintaining, as a probable scenario, the fair values as of December 31, 2012 recognized in liabilities, amounting to R$2,441. The Company considered the scenarios below for the real-dollar parity volatility.
- Scenario 1: (25% real appreciation) R$-Euro parity of 2.0216;
- Scenario 2: (50% real appreciation) R$-Euro parity of 1.3477;
- Scenario 3: (25% real depreciation) R$-Euro parity of 3.3693;
- Scenario 4: (50% real depreciation) R$-Euro parity of 4.0431.
| | | | | | | | | | | | 12/31/2012 | | | Risk | | Notional amount (€ thousand) | | Scenario 1 | | Scenario 2 | | Scenario 3 | | Scenario 4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2.6954 | | 2.0216 | | 1.3477 | | 3.3693 | | 4.0431 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net currency swap | | Euro fluctuation | | (90,000) | | 60,647 | | 121,293 | | (60,647) | | (121,293) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Exchange exposure in functional currency R$ | | Euro fluctuation | | 43,960 | | (29,622) | | (59,245) | | 29,622 | | 59,245 | (not including exchange derivatives above) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Consolidated exchange exposure | | Euro fluctuation | | (46,040) | | 31,025 | | 62,048 | | (31,025) | | (62,048) | (including exchange derivatives above) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
·Sensitivity analysis of the dollar-to-euroswap
The sensitivity analysis is based on the assumption of maintaining, as a probable scenario, the fair values as of December 31, 2012 recognized in liabilities, amounting to R$4,241. The Company considered the scenarios below for the real-dollar parity volatility.
- Scenario 1: (25% real appreciation) Euro-dollar parity of 0.9893;
- Scenario 2: (50% real appreciation) Euro-dollar parity of 0.6595;
- Scenario 3: (25% real depreciation) Euro-dollar parity of 1.6488;
- Scenario 4: (50% real depreciation) Euro-dollar parity of 1.9785.
FS-50
| | | | | | | | | | | | 12/31/2012 | | | Risk | | Notional amount (US$ thousand) | | Scenario 1 | | Scenario 2 | | Scenario 3 | | Scenario 4 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1.3190 | | 0.9893 | | 0.6595 | | 1.6488 | | 1.9785 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Net currency swap | | US dollar fluctuation | 44,392 | | (14,638) | | (29,277) | | 14,638 | | 29,277 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Exchange exposure in functional currency euro | | US dollar fluctuation | (6,162) | | 2,032 | | 4,064 | | (2,032) | | (4,064) | (not including exchange derivatives above) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Consolidated exchange exposure | | US dollar fluctuation | 38,230 | | (12,606) | | (25,213) | | 12,606 | | 25,213 | (including exchange derivatives above) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
·Interest rate risk
Short- and long-term liabilities indexed to floating interest rate and inflation indices. Due to this exposure, the Company undertakes derivative transactions to better manage these risks.
·Interest rate swap transactions (LIBOR to CDI)
The objective of these transactions is to hedge transactions indexed to US dollar LIBOR against fluctuations in Brazilian interest rates. Basically, the Company carried out swaps of its obligations indexed to the LIBOR, in which it receives interest of 1.25% p.a. on the notional value of the dollar (long position) and pays 96% of the CDI on the notional amount in reais of the contract date (short position). The notional amount of this swap as of December 31, 2012 is US$64,500,000, hedging an export prepayment transaction in the same amount. The gains and losses on these contracts are directly related to fluctuations in exchange rates (US$) and interest rates (LIBOR and CDI). In general, these are transactions conducted in the Brazilian over-the-counter market that have as counterparty a prime financial institution.
As at December 31, 2012, the position of these contracts is as follows:
| | | |
12/31/2012 | | | |
12/31/2011 | | | | | Notional amount (US$ thousand) | | Appreciation (R$) | | Fair value (market) (R$) | | | | Notional amount (US$ thousand) | | Appreciation (R$) | | Fair value (market) (R$) | Countraparties | | Transaction maturity | | 2012 | | Asset position | | Liability position | | Amount payable | | Transaction maturity | | 2011 | | Asset position | | Liability position | | Amount payable | CSFB | | 11/13/2012 | | 64,500 | | 109,540 | | (110,226) | | (686) | | 2/13/2012 | | 107,500 | | 182,432 | | (184,556) | | (2,124) |
The position of outstanding transactions was recorded in the Company’s liabilities amounting to R$686 as of December 31, 2012 (R$2,124in liabilities as of December 31, 2011) and its effects are recognized in the Company’s finance income (costs) as a loss totaling R$9,166 for 2012, of which R$8,480 refers to transactions already settled (loss of R$20,594 for 2011).
·Sensitivity analysis of interest rate swaps (LIBOR to CDI)
The sensitivity analysis is based on the assumption of maintaining, as a probable scenario, the fair values as of December 31, 2012 recognized in liabilities, amounting to R$686. The Company considered the scenarios below for the LIBOR (US$) and CDI interest rates volatility.
| | | | | | | | | | 12/31/2012 | | Notional amount (US$ thousand) | | Risk | | 25% | | 50% | 25% | | 50% | LIBOR-to-CDI interest rate swap | 64,500 | | (Libor) US$ | | (8,224) | | (9,717) | 8,224 | | 9,717 |
FS-51
·Sensitivity analysis of changes in interest rates
The Company considers the effects of a 5% increase or decrease in interest rates on its outstanding borrowings, financing and debentures as of December 31, 2012 in the consolidated financial statements.
| | | | Impact on profit or loss | Changes in interest rates | | % p.a. | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | TJLP | | 5.50 | | 9,667 | | 1,372 | Libor | | 0.51 | | 6,607 | | 7,941 | CDI | | 6.90 | | 50,391 | | 72,607 |
·Share market price risks
The Company is exposed to the risk of changes in equity prices due to the investments made and classified as available-for-sale. Equity investments refer to blue chips traded on BM&F BOVESPA.
The following table shows the impact of the net changes in the market value of financial instruments classified as available-for-sale on shareholders' equity, in other comprehensive income.
| | | Other comprehensive income | | | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | Net change in available-for-sale assets | | | 732.141 | | (767.015) |
The Company considers as probable scenario the amounts recognized at market values as of December 31, 2012. Sensitivity analysis is based on the assumption of maintaining as probable scenario the market values as of December 31, 2012.Therefore, there is no impact on the financial instruments classified as available for sale already presented above. The Company considered the scenarios below for volatility of the shares.
- Scenario 1: (25% appreciation of shares);
- Scenario 2: (50% appreciation of shares);
- Scenario 3: (25% devaluation of shares);
- Scenario 4: (50% devaluation of shares);
| | | Impact on equity | Companies | | Probable | | 25% | | 50% | | 25% | | 50% | Usiminas | | 730,812 | | 200,536 | | 401,072 | | (200,536) | | (401,072) | Panatlântica | | 1,329 | | 2,738 | | 5,476 | | (2,738) | | (5,476) | | | 732,141 | | 203,274 | | 406,548 | | (203,274) | | (406,548) | | | | | | | | | | | |
·Credit risks
The exposure to credit risks of financial institutions is in line with the parameters established in the financial policy. The Company adopts the practice of analyzing in detail the financial position of its customers and suppliers, establishing a credit limit and conducting ongoing monitoring of the outstanding balance.
As regards short-term investments, the Company only makes investments in institutions with low credit risk as rated by credit rating agencies. As part of the funds is invested in repos (repurchase agreements) backed by Brazilian government bonds, there is also exposure to Brazil’s sovereign risk.
FS-52
·Capital management
The Company manages its capital structure to ensure that it will be capable of providing return to its shareholders and benefits to other stakeholders, and maintain an optimal capital structure to reduce this cost.
V – Margin deposits
The Company holds margin deposits totaling R$426,328 (R$407,467 as of December 31, 2011); this amount is invested at Deutsche Bank and Credit Suisse as guarantee of the derivative financial instrument contracts, specifically swaps between CSN Islands VIII and CSN. In addition to this amount, the Company has, through its jointly controlled entity MRS, R$8,833 (R$8,227 as of December 31, 2011) linked to financing transactions with BNDES, which is part of the guarantee of these transactions.
14. OTHER PAYABLES The group of other payables classified in current and non-current liabilities is comprised as follows: | Current | | Non-current | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | Payables to related parties (Note 18 b and c ) | 284,226 | | 185,707 | | 3,103,237 | | 3,094,453 | Unrealized losses on derivatives (Note 13 I) | 245,692 | | 2,971 | | | | 373,430 | Dividends payable to Company owners (Note 18 a) | 155,537 | | 622,164 | | | | | Dividends payable non-controlling shareholders | 146,081 | | 306,760 | | | | | Advances from customers | 32,411 | | 23,868 | | | | | Taxes in installments (Note 15) | 167,282 | | 313,201 | | 1,085,079 | | 1,922,283 | Profit sharing - employees | 12,467 | | 131,755 | | | | | Other payables | 177,654 | | 142,019 | | 200,135 | | 203,354 | | 1,221,350 | | 1,728,445 | | 4,388,451 | | 5,593,520 | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Consolidated | | Current | Non-current | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Payables to related parties (Note 19 b) | 6,798 | | 249,758 | | | | 9,236,716 | Derivative financial instruments (Note 13 I) | 26,257 | | 65 | | | | 21,301 | Exclusive funds(1) | | | | | | | | Dividends and interest on capital payable to Company owners | | | 152,966 | | | | | Dividends and interest on capital payable to non-controlling owners(2) | 464,982 | | 124,131 | | | | | Advances from customers | 49,505 | | 22,905 | | | | | Taxes in installments (Note 16) | 24,237 | | 33,358 | | 87,890 | | 20,728 | Profit sharing - employees | 171,695 | | 120,278 | | | | | Freight provision | 105,104 | | 64,349 | | | | | Provision for industrial restructuring | 122,854 | | | | | | | Other provision | 30,784 | | 21,873 | | | | | Other payables | 70,801 | | 55,426 | | 43,394 | | 36,618 | | 1,073,017 | | 845,109 | | 131,284 | | 9,315,363 |
(1)Refers to derivative transactions managed by exclusive funds. (2)In connection with the business combination described in note 3, Namisa approved the dividend distribution in the amount of U$300 million, equivalent to R$1,157 million prior to its merger, in proportion to equity participation of CSN and JKTC immediately prior to the business combination, which were 60% and 40% respectively. This obligation was succeeded by the subsidiary Congonhas Minérios S.A. after incorporation of Namisa and has its liquidation scheduled for the last quarter of 2016. 15. TAXES IN INSTALLMENTSINCOME TAX AND SOCIAL CONTRIBUTION 15.a) Income tax and social contribution recognized in profit or loss: The income tax and social contribution recognized in profit or loss for the year are as follows: | | | Consolidated | | 12/31/2015 | 12/31/2014 | 12/31/2013 | Income tax and social contribution income (expense) | | | | Current | (380,831) | (528,170) | (1,290,755) | Deferred | 192,207 | 679,323 | 1,216,594 | | (188,624) | 151,153 | (74,161) |
F-57
The reconciliation of consolidated income tax and social contribution expenses and income and the result from applying the effective rate to profit before income tax and social contribution are as follows: | | | | | Consolidated | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | | 12/31/2013 | (Loss) profit before income tax and social contribution | 1,804,575 | | (263,420) | | 608,155 | Tax rate | 34% | | 34% | | 34% | Income tax and social contribution at combined statutory rate | (613,556) | | 89,563 | | (206,773) | Adjustment to reflect the effective rate: | | | | | | Interest on capital benefit | | | | | 255,000 | Equity pickup | 394,518 | | 112,594 | | 53,767 | Profit with differentiated rates or untaxed | 829,265 | | 1,772 | | 173,330 | Transfer pricing adjustment | (66,447) | | (2,350) | | (31,404) | Tax loss carryforwards without recognizing deferred taxes | (176,795) | | (29,259) | | (166,734) | Indebtdness limit | (54,091) | | (13,170) | | | Deferred taxes on temporary differences - non computed (1) | (1,143,365) | | | | | Refis Effect and early discharge | (2,586) | | (14,649) | | (689,299) | Deferred taxes on foreign profit | 72,376 | | | | | Fair value on Namisa stake of 60% | 632,030 | | | | | Subsidiaries’ tax credit | | | | | 550,270 | Other permanent deductions (add-backs) | (59,973) | | 6,652 | | (12,318) | Income tax and social contribution in profit for the period | (188,624) | | 151,153 | | (74,161) | Effective tax rate | 10% | | 57% | | 12% |
(1) As from third quarter of 2015 the Company no longer computes income tax and social contribution credits on tax losses and temporary differences. See details in note 15 (b). F-58
15.b) Deferred income tax and social contribution: The deferred income tax and social contribution are calculated on income tax and social contribution tax losses and the temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the financial statements. | | | | | | | | | | | | | Opening balance | | Movement | | Closing balance | | 12/31/2014 | | Comprehensive income |
| Profit or loss | | Tax Crédits(**) | | Others | | 12/31/2015 | | | | | | | | | | | | | Deferred tax assets | | | | | | | | | | | | Income tax losses | 383,185 | | 11,629 | | (175,479) | | 6,910 | | | | 226,245 | Social contribution tax losses | 75,662 | | | | 14,565 | | 2,804 | | | | 93,031 | Temporary differences | 2,157,211 | | 250,519 | | 650,824 | | | | (70,803) | | 2,987,751 | - Provision for tax. social security, labor, civil and environmental risks | 226,741 | | | | 5,206 | | | | (12,088) | | 219,859 | - Provision for environmental liabilities | 71,925 | | | | 18,243 | | | | (1,667) | | 88,501 | - Asset impairment losses | 68,981 | | | | (1,088) | | | | (408) | | 67,485 | - Inventory impairment losses | 32,366 | | | | (6,953) | | | | (9,475) | | 15,938 | - (Gains)/losses on financial instruments | (6,419) | | | | 965 | | | | | | (5,454) | - (Gains)/losses on available-for-sale financial assets | 618,291 | | 124,924 | | 188,801 | | | | | | 932,016 | - Income tax and social contribution non computed o/ available-for-sale financial assets | | 15,973 | | | | | | | | 15,973 | - Actuarial liability (pension and healthcare plan) | 163,627 | | (68) | | | | | | | | 163,559 | - Accrued supplies and services | 68,483 | | | | 10,098 | | | | (29,541) | | 49,040 | - Allow ance for doubtful debts | 29,852 | | | | 2,673 | | | | (1,111) | | 31,414 | - Goodw ill on merger | (102,659) | | (8,435) | | 111,094 | | | | | | | - Unrealized exchange differences (*) | 1,011,007 | | | | 1,416,919 | | | | | | 2,427,926 | - (Gain) on loss of control over Transnordestina | (224,096) | | | | | | | | | | (224,096) | - Cash flow hedge accounting | 41,015 | | 475,816 | | | | | | | | 516,831 | - Income tax and social contribution non computed o/ cash flow hedge accounting | | (357,951) | | | | | | | | (357,951) | - Deferred taxes non computed | | | | | (1,133,091) | | | | | | (1,133,091) | - Other | 158,097 | | 260 | | 37,957 | | | | (16,513) | | 179,801 | Non-current assets | 2,616,058 | | 262,148 | | 489,910 | | 9,714 | | (70,803) | | 3,307,027 | | Deferred tax liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | Temporary differences | 238,892 | | 67,652 | | 297,703 | | | | (109,396) | | 494,851 | - Provision for tax. social security, labor, civil and environmental risks | | | | | (567) | | | | (14,302) | | (14,869) | - Provision for environmental liabilities | | | | | 878 | | | | (1,667) | | (789) | - Asset impairment losses | | | | | (7,743) | | | | (10,698) | | (18,441) | - Inventory impairment losses | | | | | (435) | | | | (10,725) | | (11,160) | - Actuarial liability (pension and healthcare plan) | | | (504) | | (104) | | | | | | (608) | - Accrued supplies and services | | | | | 21,129 | | | | (64,079) | | (42,950) | - Allow ance for doubtful debts | | | | | (17) | | | | (1,111) | | (1,128) | - Fair value adjustment - SWT Aquisition | 222,454 | | 63,406 | | (33,311) | | | | | | 252,549 | - Fair Value adjustment - Mining Business combination | | | | | 317,041 | | | | 19,402 | | 336,443 | - Others | 16,438 | | 4,750 | | 832 | | | | (26,216) | | (4,196) | Non-current liabilities | 238,892 | | 67,652 | | 297,703 | | | | (109,396) | | 494,851 |
(*) The Company taxes foreign exchange differences on a cash basis to calculate income tax and social contribution. (**) Reversal of Company´s tax credits and tax loss carryforwards to settle tax debts, as provided for in Law No. 12,865/13, 12,996/14 and 13,043/14, due to exclusion of contingences, related to tax installment program, on the consolidation of debts. The Company has its corporate structure overseas subsidiaries, for which profits are taxed at income tax in the countries where they are domiciled by lower rates than those prevailing in Brazil. From 2011 to 2015 some abroad subsidiaries generated profits amounting to R$4,025,071, in case tax authorities understand that these profits have already been distributed and, therefore, additional taxation in Brazil, if due, would amount approximately to R$1,356,111 in income tax and social contribution. The Company, based on its legal counsel’s opinion, assessed the likelihood of loss in a potential challenge by tax authorities as possible and, therefore, no provision was recognized in the financial statements. F-59
·Law 12.973/14
Law 12.973, enacted in May 2014, brought significant changes to tax legislation, which among others, revoked the Transition Tax Regime (RTT).Theses changes directly impact the determination of the income tax and social contribution basis. As from 2015, the application of the Law is mandatory and CSN applied the Law´s requirements. ·Impairment test - Deferred taxes CSN approved by the Board of Directors´ Meeting of November 6 th2015, a study to demonstrate the generation of future taxable income with which it is expected that the credits currently registered in the balance sheet are offset. The test was performed considering only the parent company, since the other group companies have no relevant credits for purposes of this test. The parent company consists of the following businesses: • Flat Steel Brazil; • Long Steel Brazil; • Mining • Cement; • Investments in other entities. The study was prepared based on the CSN´s financial model of long-term and considered several scenarios which vary according to different macroeconomic and operating assumptions. Furthermore, the model considers a combination of assets sales scenario and liquidity events in order to achieve a specific amount of resources to CSN allowing a leverage reduction of and consequently, the reduction of financial expenses. In addition, a sensitivity analysis of tax credits utilization considering a change in macroeconomic assumptions, operational performance and liquidity events took place. This sensitivity analysis showed that the consumption of credits is sensitive to exogenous issues and outside the Company's control. Thus, considering the study´s results, which indicates the probable future taxable income to compensate the deferred income tax and social contribution balances recognized until June 30, 2015, the Board of Directors agreed to not record the deferred income tax and social contribution as from the 3rd quarter of 2015. If the tax credit for the second quarter was constituted, the amount would be R$1.09 billion. Additionally, the study projects the compensation of the residual balance amounting R$3,229 million for the next periods according to the schedule below: In millions of reais | | Parent Company | 2016 | | 686 | 2017 | | 622 | 2018 | | 152 | 2019 | | 192 | 2020 | | 286 | 2021 | | 464 | 2022 | | 576 | 2023 | | 251 | | | 3,229 |
15.c) Income tax and social contribution recognized in shareholders' equity: The income tax and social contribution recognized directly in shareholders' equity are as follows: | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | | 12/31/2013 | Income tax and social contribution | | | | | | Actuarial gains on defined benefit pension plan | 64,489 | | 65,372 | | 33,012 | Changes in the fair value on available-for-sale financial assets | 38 | | (140,859) | | (401,574) | Exchange differences on translating foreign operations | (425,510) | | (425,510) | | (425,510) | Cash flow hedge accounting | 158,880 | | 41,015 | | | | (202,103) | | (459,982) | | (794,072) |
F-60
16.Taxes in installments The position of the Refis debts arising fromand other tax installment payment plans, recorded in taxes in installments in current and non-current liabilities, as mentioned in note 14, is as follows: | Current | | Non-current | | | | | | | Consolidated | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | Current | Non-current | Federal REFIS (a) | 120,441 | | 276,924 | | 998,668 | | 1,817,817 | | | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Federal REFIS Law 11.941/0(a) | | 11,891 | | 9,942 | | 19,247 | | | Federal REFIS Law 12.865/1(a) | | 4,830 | | | | 56,661 | | | Other taxes in installments (b) | 46,841 | | 36,277 | | 86,411 | | 104,466 | 7,516 | | 23,416 | | 11,982 | | 20,728 | | 167,282 | | 313,201 | | 1,085,079 | | 1,922,283 | 24,237 | | 33,358 | | 87,890 | | 20,728 | | | | | | | | | |
a)16.a) Tax Recovery Program (REFIS)(Federal Refis)
On·Federal Law 11.941/09 Tax Installment Payment Program
In November 26, 2009 the Group companiesCompany joined the Tax Recovery Programs establishedInstallment Payment Program introduced by Law 11,941/11.941/09, and Provisional Measure 470/2009, aimedaiming at settlingregularizing tax liabilities through a special payment system and installment plan for the settlement of tax obligations and social security obligations. Joining the special tax programs reduced the amount of fines, interest and legal charges previously due.security. Management’s decision took into consideration matters already judged by higher courts, as well as the assessment of outside legal counsel regarding the possibility of favorable outcomes in the contingences in progress. In July 2010, the Company elected offset incomeThe group decided to pay all tax and social contribution carryforwads against the last four installments of the installment plan, as allowed by relevant legislation.
FS-53
In February 2010, the debts payable enrolled in the installment plan under Law 11,941/09, already recognized through provisions, were reviewed based on the reductions in debits set forth in special programs, administrative appeals or legal proceedings. In the first quarter of 2010, the negative effect before income tax and social contribution of R$42,365 was accounted for in other operating income and expenses and in finance income (costs) (see 24 e 25).
In June 2011, the Group companies consolidated the debts enrolled in the tax program set forth by Law 11,941/09, payable in 180 SELIC-adjusted installments.
With respect towith judicial deposits linked to REFIS proceedings,in cash. The Group awaits the Company obtained a favorable opinion fromapproval by the Federal Revenue Service (RFB) and the National Treasury Attorney General’s Office (PGFN) that allows that part of this excess is usedthese amounts, which total R$9,942.
National Minerals SA (NAMISA), incorporated by Congonhas Ores on December 31, 2015, and now consolidated in these financial statements at December 27, 2013 and November 25, 2014 has chosen to include some debts in the Companyprogram installment introduced by Law 11,941 / 2009, due to partially settle the remaining balancereopening of the deadlines for accession brought by Law No. 12,865 / 13 and 12,996 / 14, respectively ·Installment Payment Program, Federal law 12.865/13 NAMISA also chose to include in the tax installment program underplan established by Article 40 of Law11,941/09 through offset, with No. 12,865 / 13, thebenefits granted income tax debts and based on the profits of subsidiaries located abroad from 2009 to payments in cash. In light2012, resulting from the application of this PGFN guidance and supported by previous court rulings, the Company carried out this offset. The balance of this excess deposit as of December 31, 2012 after these offsets was R$84,392 (R$806,103 as of December 31, 2011), recognized in line item Credits with the PGFN/RFB, in other non-current assets. The offset generated a net finance income gain net of taxes (pursuant to Law 11,941/09) of R$115,457 (see note 25).Article 74 MP 2158-35 / 2001. b)16.b) Other tax installments (regular and other)
TheSome Group companies also joinedhave installment payment plans with the Regular social securityFederal Revenue Service and state tax (INSS) installment plan and other plans.authorities.
16.17. PROVISIONSPROVISION FOR TAX, SOCIAL SECURITY, LABOR, CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS AND JUDICIAL DEPOSITS
Claims of different nature are being challenged at the appropriate courts. Details of the accrued amounts and related judicial deposits are as follows: | | | | | | | | | Consolidated | | | | | 12/31/2012 | | | | 12/31/2011 | | Accrued liabilities | | Judicial deposits | | | Accrued liabilities | | Judicial deposits | | Accrued liabilities | | Judicial deposits | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Tax | | 178,657 | | 101,795 | | 94,317 | | 353,778 | | 143,852 | | 129,524 | | 82,472 | | 77,836 | Social security and labor | | 289,832 | | 162,513 | | 284,556 | | 131,443 | | Social security | | | 70,174 | | 62,277 | | 46,193 | | 46,193 | Labor | | | 478,611 | | 444,243 | | 165,027 | | 136,396 | Civil | | 109,915 | | 42,562 | | 94,183 | | 50,909 | | 128,451 | | 106,143 | | 24,634 | | 17,897 | Environmental | | 7,056 | | | | 6,906 | | | | 17,646 | | 3,981 | | 1,697 | | 1,697 | Judicial deposits | | | | 11,401 | | | | 26,928 | | | | | | 8,519 | | 8,785 | | | 585,460 | | 318,271 | | 479,962 | | 563,058 | | 838,734 | | 746,168 | | 328,542 | | 288,804 | Legal obligations challenged in courts: | | | | | | | | | | Tax | | | | | | | | | | Salary premium for education | | 24,077 | | 46,193 | | 33,121 | | 36,189 | | Income tax on ”Plano Verão” | | 20,892 | | 348,969 | | 20,892 | | 345,676 | | Other provisions | | 97,157 | | 19,233 | | 104,488 | | 9,788 | | | | 142,126 | | 414,395 | | 158,501 | | 391,653 | | | | 727,586 | | 732,666 | | 638,463 | | 954,711 | | | | | | | | | | | |
FS-54F-61
The changes in the provisionsprovision for tax, social security, labor, civil and environmental risks in the periodyear ended December 31, 20122015 were as follows: | | | | | | | | | | | Consolidated | | | | | | | Current + non-current | | | | Current | | | | | | | | | | Current + Non- current | Nature | | 12/31/2011 | | Additions | | Inflation adjustment | | Utilization | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | | 12/31/2014 | | Additions | | Accrued charges | | Net utilization of reversal | | 12/31/2015 | Tax | | 252,818 | | 127,842 | | 5,613 | | (65,490) | | 320,783 | | | | 220 | | 129,524 | | 120,673 | | 7,841 | | (114,186) | | 143,852 | Social security | | 61,541 | | 1,552 | | 2,858 | | (22,093) | | 43,858 | | | | | | 62,277 | | | | 7,897 | | | | 70,174 | Labor | | 223,015 | | 42,756 | | 29,377 | | (49,174) | | 245,974 | | 245,974 | | 204,615 | | 444,243 | | 213,543 | | 61,445 | | (240,620) | | 478,611 | Civil | | 94,183 | | 29,101 | | 3,347 | | (16,716) | | 109,915 | | 109,915 | | 87,343 | | 106,143 | | 34,951 | | 35,372 | | (48,015) | | 128,451 | Environmental | | 6,906 | | | | 150 | | | | 7,056 | | | | | | 3,981 | | 20,401 | | 284 | | (7,020) | | 17,646 | | | 638,463 | | 201,251 | | 41,345 | | (153,473) | | 727,586 | | 355,889 | | 292,178 | | 746,168 | | 389,568 | | 112,839 | | (409,841) | | 838,734 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The provision for tax, social security, labor, civil and environmental liabilities was estimated by management and is mainly based on the legal counsel’s assessment. Only proceedings for which the risk is classified as probable loss are accrued. Moreover, thisThis provision includes tax liabilities resulting from contingencieslawsuits filed by the Company, subject to SELIC (Central Bank’s policy rate). a) Tax lawsuits
I - Income tax and social contribution
“Verão” Plan -CSNis claimingThe main tax lawsuits assessed by the recognitionoutside legal counsel as probable losses to which CSN or its subsidiaries are parties are as follows: (i) Municipal tax assessments (ISS) incident in lease contracts; (ii) ICMS Assessment Notice for the alleged nonpayment of financial andthis tax effects on the calculationproduct imports; (iii) Tax Forfeiture to collect ICMS reported but not paid; (iv) collection of income tax and social contribution related to removal byfor the governmentoffset of inflation measured according to the Consumer Price Index (IPC) in January and February 1989, involving a total percentage figure of 51.87% (‘Plano Verão”).nonexistent tax credits.
In 2004 the lawsuit was terminated with a final and unappealable decision that granted the right to apply the index of 42.72% (January 1989), with the 12.15% already applied to be deducted from this index. The final decision also granted application of the index of 10.14% (February 1989). The proceeding is currently at expert discovery stage.Labor lawsuits
As of December 31, 2012, there is an amount of R$348,969 (R$345,676 as of December 31, 2011) deposited in court, classified in a specific account of judicial deposits in long-term receivables, and a provision of R$20,892 (R$20,892 as of December 31, 2011), which represents the portion not recognized by the courts. II - Salary premium for education - "Salário Educação"
CSN has filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the salary premium for education and for discussing the possibility of recovering the amounts paid in the period from January 5, 1989 to October 16, 1996. The lawsuit was unsuccessful, and the TRF upheld the decision unfavorable to CSN, a decision that is final and unappealable.
In view of the final and unappealable decision, CSN tried to make payment of the amount due, though the FNDE and INSS did not reach an agreement as to which agency should receive it. They also required that the amount should be paid along with a fine, with which the Company did not agree.
Lawsuits were then filed challenging the above events, with judicial deposit of the amounts involved in the lawsuits. In the first lawsuit, the lower court partly accepted the Company’s request, with the judge deducting the fine, but upholding the SELIC rate, with counterarguments against the defendant’s appeal against the SELIC rate.
As of December 31, 2012 the accrued amount totals R$24,077 (R$33,121 as of December 31, 2011) and the judicial deposit amounts to R$46,193 (R$36,189 as of December 31, 2011).
FS-55
III - Other
CSN has also recognized provisions for lawsuits relating to INSS, FGTS Complementary Law 110, PIS Law 10,637/02 and PIS/COFINS - Manaus Free Trade Zone, totaling R$97,157as of December 31, 3012 (R$102,965 as at December 31, 2010), which includes legal charges.
b) Payroll and related taxes
As of December 31, 2012,2015, the Group is a defendant in 12,0807,541 labor lawsuits, for which a provision has been recorded in the amount of R$245,974478,611 (R$223,015444,243 as of December 31, 2011)2014). Most of the claims relate to subsidiary and/or joint liability, salary equalization, health hazard premiums and hazardous duty premiums, overtime pay, difference in the 40% fine for the severance pay fund (FGTS) related to period prior to retirement and as a result of federal government economic plans, health care plan, indemnity claims resulting from alleged occupational diseases or on-the-job accidents, breaks between working hours, and differences in profit sharing from 1997 to 1999 and from 2001 to 2003.
During the year ended December 31, 2015 there were addition or write-off movements in labor lawsuits, due to court orders issued to terminate lawsuits and the constant revision of the Company’s accounting estimates related to the provision for contingencies that take into consideration the different nature of the claims made, as required by the Company’s accounting policies. c) Civil lawsuits
Among the civil lawsuits in which the Company is a defendant are claims for compensation. Generally these lawsuits result from on-the-job accidents, occupational diseases and contractual litigation related to the industrial activities of the Group, real estate actions, healthcare plan, and reimbursement of costs incurred in labor courts. For lawsuits involving civil matters, a provision has been recognized in the amount of R$109,915128,451 as of December 31, 20122015 (R$102,486106,143 as of December 31, 2011) d) Other2014)
§Competition
On June 14, 2010, the Regional Federal Court of Brasília rejected the annulment action filed by CSN against CADE, which aimed at annulling its fine for the alleged infringements laid down in Articles 20 and 21, I, of Law 8,884/1984. The Company filed appropriate appeals against this decision, which were dismissed, resulting in the filing of a Motion for clarification, which is pending judgment. The collection of the R$65,292 fine is suspended by a Court decision, which stays the collection as from the date CSN issued a guarantee letter. This proceeding is classified as risk of possible loss.
§Environmental lawsuits
The environmental administrative/judicial proceedings filed against the Company include mainly administrative proceedings for alleged environmental irregularities and the regularization of environmental permits; at the judicial level, the Company is a party to actions collecting the fines imposed for such alleged environmental irregularities and public civil actions claimclaiming regularization coupled with compensation, in most cases claiming environmental recovery. In general these proceedings arise from alleged damages to the environment related to the Company’s industrial activities. TheForlawsuits involving environmental proceedings totalmatters, a provision has been recognized in the amount of R$7,056(R$6,90617,646 as of December 31, 2011).2015 (R$3,981 as of December 31, 2014) F-62
In July 2012 the Company received a legal notice in the lawsuit filed by the State Attorney's Office of the State of Rio de Janeiro, related to Volta Grande IV district in the city of Volta Redonda-RJ, claiming, among others, the removal of two industrial waste cells and 750 (seven hundred and fifty) homes. This lawsuit is classified as probable loss risk, but there is not, anuntil the moment, a complete diagnostic of the risks and so the Company has not estimated amount due to the illiquidity of thecosts for those claims. As a result of the lawsuit mentioned in the paragraph above, after August 2012 the Company received legal notices related to some lawsuits filed by one of the dwellers of the Volta Grande IV district, who claims the payment of compensation for property damages and pain and suffering, whose amounts are illiquid at the moment, and this lawsuit is classified as possible loss risk. §Other Administrative and Judicial ProcessesOn the same matter (Bairro Volta Grande IV), in August 2013 the Company received a subpoena about the lawsuits filed by the Federal Public Prosecution Office (Federal Courts), which has the same claim of the lawsuit filed by the State Public Prosecution Office, described above. This new lawsuit is classified as possible risk of loss since the trend is that the State courts’ decision prevails also in the Federal courts. The risk amount in this new lawsuit is the same of the lawsuit filed by the State Public Prosecution Office.
The Group is a defendant in other§Other administrative and judicial proceedings (tax, social security, labor, civil,
The table below shows a summary of the balance of the main legal matters compared with the balance at December 31, 2014 and environmental),2015. | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Tax assessment notice issued against the Company for an alleged sale of 40% of the shares of its joint venture NAMISA to a Japanese-Korean consortium, | | 7,743,501 | | 7,068,252 | Income tax / Social contribution - Assessment Notice and Imposition of Fine (AIIM) - - Disallowance of deductions of goodwill generated in the reverse incorporation of Big Jump by Namisa (*) | | 2,250,833 | | | Assessment Notice and Imposition of Fine (AIIM) - Income tax / Social contribution - gloss of interest on prepayment arising from supply contracts of iron ore and port services | | 1,105,793 | | | Tax foreclosures - ICMS - Electricity credits | | 785,043 | | 742,727 | Installments MP 470 - alleged insufficiency of tax losses | | 587,205 | | 521,340 | Offset of taxes that were not approved by the Federal Revenue Service - IRPJ/CSLL, PIS/COFINS e IPI | | 1,015,355 | | 523,171 | Assessment notice for an alleged nonpayment of taxes- IRPJ/CSLL - foreign subsidiaries (2010) | | 526,047 | | 476,316 | Assessment Notice and Imposition of Fine (AIIM) - Income tax / Social contribution - Profits earned abroad 2008 (*) | | 306,136 | | | Disallowance of the ICMS credits - Transfer of iron ore | | 516,581 | | 446,907 | Disallowance of the ICMS credits - ICMS - acquisition of subsidiary | | 277,389 | | 257,536 | ICMS - Refers to the transfer of imported raw material at an amount lower than the price disclosed in the import documentation | | 252,112 | | 230,261 | Disallowance of the tax losses arising on adjustments to the SAPLI | | 409,323 | | 362,489 | Assessment Notice - ICMS - shipping and return merchandise for Industrialization (*) | | 541,338 | | | Assessment Notice- Income tax- Capital Gain of CFM vendors located outside (*) | | 170,835 | | | Other tax (federal, state, and municipal) lawsuits. | | 2,537,626 | | 2,870,796 | Social security lawsuits | | 289,923 | | 299,341 | Annulment action filed by CSN against CADE | | 70,423 | | 63,463 | Other civil lawsuits | | 763,576 | | 382,641 | Labor and social security lawsuits | | 1,032,678 | | 1,069,663 | Environmental lawsuits | | 359,046 | | 115,024 | | | 21,540,763 | | 15,429,927 |
(*) Namisa lawsuits that after the drop down started to reflect in the approximate amount of R$14,632,211, of which R$1,137,412 related to labor and social security lawsuits, R$615,291 to civil lawsuits, and R$30,033 to environmental lawsuits. CSN financial statements. The assessments made by the legal counseldefine these administrative and judicial proceedings as entailing risk of possible loss and, therefore, no provision was recorded in conformity with Management’s judgment and accounting practices adopted in Brazil. Environmental lawsuits FS-56F-63
The environmental processes present high complexity for estimating the amount at risk, should be taken into consideration, among various aspects, procedural development, the extent of damage and the projection of repairing costs. During the second quarter 2015, in line with the Company's accounting policy of prognostic losses of ongoing processes, the management has reevaluated its environmental contingencies, supported by its internal and external legal counsel. As a result of this work, there was an increase of the possible risk of loss amounting R$ 244,022. There are other environmental processes for which it is not yet possible to assess the tax lawsuits these represent R$12,849,475risk and aredescribed below: contingency value due to the aforementioned complexity estimation, the peculiarities of the matters involving them and also their procedural steps. a)R$1,968,138refers to the assessment notice issued against the Company and its jointly controlled entity Namisa for an alleged nonpayment of income tax (IRPJ) and social contribution on net income (CSLL) on profits recognized in the balance sheets of its foreign subsidiaries. In view of the recent changes in administrative and judicial decisions, our outside legal counsel classified the possibility of an unfavorable outcome as possible.The total amount of the assessment against Namisa is R$256 million, however, as we only hold a 60% interest in Namisa, when calculating the total amount of these assessments we include only R$154 million, or 60% of the amount for Namisa;
b)R$6,079,359 refers to the tax assessment notice issued against the Company for an alleged sale of 40% of the shares of its subsidiary NAMISA to a Japanese-Korean consortium, thus failing to determine and pay taxes on the capital gain resulting from this transaction. In light of the evidence that shows that such sale was not completed, our outside legal counsel classified the possibility of an unfavorable outcome as possible.
c)R$1,047,950 refers to 60% of the tax assessment notice issued against CSN’s jointly controlled entity NAMISA, concurrently with the tax assessment notice described in “b” above, for having allegedly utilized in an incorrect manner, in 2009 and 2011, goodwill arising on the investment made by the Japanese-Korean consortium in direct subsidiary NAMISA, which was subsequently merged. In light of the arguments that show that the goodwill utilization was legal based on existing previous administrative court rulings, our outside legal counsel classified the possibility of an unfavorable outcome to NAMISA as possible.The total amount of this assessment is R$ 1,747 million, however, as we only hold a 60% interest in Namisa, when calculating the amount of this particular assessment we include only 60% of the total amount.
d)R$3,754,028 related to other tax proceedings (federal, state and municipal) and social security.
17.18. PROVISIONSPROVISION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITIES AND ASSET DECOMMISSIONINGRETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
The balance of the provision for environmental liabilities and asset retirement obligation - ARO is as follows: | | | Consolidated | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Environmental liabilities | 262,290 | | 211,544 | Asset retirement obligations | 66,641 | | 26,995 | | 328,931 | | 238,539 |
a)18.a) Environmental liabilities
As of December 31, 2012,2015, there is a provision is recognized in the amount of R$386,114 (R$312,612 as of December 31, 2011) for expenditures relating to environmental investigation and recovery services for potentially contaminated areas surrounding establishments in the States of Rio de Janeiro, Minas Gerais and Santa Catarina. Estimated expenditures will be reviewed periodically and the amounts already recognized will be adjusted whenever needed.necessary. These are management’sManagement’s best estimates considering recoverybased on the environmental remediation studies in areas that have been degraded and are in the process of being used for activities.projects. This provision is recognized inas other operating expenses. The provision is measured at the present value of the expenditures required to settle the obligation, using a pretax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the specific risks of the obligation. The increase in the obligation due to passage of time is recognized as other operating expenses. The long-term interest rate used to discount the provision to present value and update the provision through December 31, 20122015 was 11.00%10.00%. The liability recognized is periodically updated based on the general market price index (IGPM) for the period. Some contingent environmental liabilities are monitored by environmental department were not recorded in provisions due to its characteristics, they do not meet the recognition criteria present in IAS 37. b) Decommissioning of assets18.b) Asset retirement
Obligations on decommissioning of assets consist of
Asset retirement obligations refer to estimated costs for decommissioning, retirement or restoration of areas upon the termination of activities related to mining resources. The initial measurement is recognized as a liability discounted to present value and subsequently through increase in expenses over time. The asset decommissioningretirement cost equivalent to the initial liability is capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the asset, being depreciated over the useful life of the asset. The liability recognized asaccounting balances that refer to the provision for decommissioning were transferred to Congonhas Minérios, The increase of December 31, 2012liabilities in the period is R$27,326 (R$24,327 asdue to an update on estimated cost of December 31, 2011).closing iron ore mines. In 2015, the Company completed a new certification of iron mineral reserves in the Casa de Pedra and Engenho mines. This certification, prepared by a specialized company, has certified reserves of 3,021 million tons of iron ore, which represents an increase of 85% compared to the amounts certified in the last audit on April 2007. FS-57F-64
Therefore, it indicated a need to review liabilities and update assumptions for mine closure, completion of mining activities in the future and decommissioning of assets linked to the mine, the result is an increase of liabilities amounting R$ 39,646. 18.19. RELATED-PARTY BALANCES AND TRANSACTIONS
a)19.a) Transactions with Holding CompanyCompanies
Vicunha Siderurgia S.A. is a holding company set up for the purpose of holding equity interests in other companies and is the Company’s main shareholder, with 47.86%51.41% of the voting shares. The Rio Iaco Participações S.A. holds 3.99%4.29% of CSN.CSN’s voting capital. · Liabilities Companies | | Proposed | | Paid | | Dividends | | Dividends | Vicunha Siderurgia (*) | | | | 282,571 | Rio Iaco | | | | 23,568 | Total at 12/31/2015 | |
| | 306,139 | Total at 12/31/2014 | | 152,966 | | 220,349 |
Companies | | Proposed | | Paid | | Dividends | | Dividends | | Interest on capital | Vicunha Siderurgia | | 143,563 | | 574,267 | | | Rio Iaco | | 11,974 | | 47,897 | | | Total at 12/31/2012 | | 155,537 | | 622,164 | | | Total at 12/31/2011 | | 622,164 | | 777,706 | | 184,987 | | | | | | | |
(*) As of June 30, 2015 Vicunha Steel began to directly control CSN due to the merger of Vicunha Siderurgia by Vicunha Aços on that date. Vicunha Siderurgia’ssteel’s corporate structure is as follows (unaudited information): Vicunha Aços S.A. – holds 99.99% of Vicunha Siderurgia S.A.
Vicunha Steel S.A. – holds 66.96% of Vicunha Aços S.A. National Steel S.A. – holds 33.04% of Vicunha Aços S.A. CFL Participações S.A. – holds 40% of National Steel S.A. and 40% of Vicunha Steel S.A. Rio Purus Participações S.A. – holds 60% of National Steel S.A., 59.99% 60% of Vicunha Steel S.A. and 99.99% of Rio Iaco Participações S.A. b)Transactions with jointly controlled entities and associates
·Assets
Companies | | Trade receivables | | Loans/ Prepayment(1) | | Other | | Total | | | | | Joint controlled entities | | | | | | | | | Nacional Minérios S.A. | | 72,929 | | 125,938 | | 2,908 | | 201,775 | MRS Logística S.A. | | 58 | | | | | | 58 | CBSI - Companhia Brasileira de Serviços e Infraestrutura | | 4,476 | | 4,476 | CGPAR - Contrução Pesada S.A. | | | | | | 13,854 | | 13,854 | Associates | | | | | | | | | Arvedi Metalfer do Brasil S.A. | | | | 5,063 | | | | 5,063 | Total at 12/31/2012 | | 72,987 | | 131,001 | | 21,238 | | 225,226 | Total at 12/31/2011 | | 31,741 | | 117,086 | | | | 148,827 | | | | | | | | | |
(1)Nacional Minérios SA - Refers to Prepayment operations with indirect subsidiary CSN Europe, CSN and CSN Portugal Iberia. Contract in US$: interest of 5.37% pa to 6.8% pa maturing in June, 2015. On December 31, 2012, loans totaling R$125,938 (R$117,086 as of December 31, 2011), of which R$58 classified in short term (R$1,537 as of December 31, 2011) and R$125,880 classified in long term (R$115,549 as of December 31, 2011).
FS-58F-65
19.b) Transactions with subsidiaries, joint ventures, associates, exclusive funds and other related parties
· Liabilities By transaction | Consolidated | | | Current | | Non-Current | | Total | | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | Trade receivables(note 6) | | 61,366 | | 153,737 | | | | | | 61,366 | | 153,737 | Dividends receivable(note 6) | | 27,817 | | 59,470 | | | | | | 27,817 | | 59,470 | Actuarial asset(note 8) | | | | | | 114,433 | | 97,173 | | 114,433 | | 97,173 | Loans(note 8) | | | | 517,493 | | 373,214 | | 117,357 | | 373,214 | | 634,850 | Other receivables(note 8) | | 9,420 | | 15,780 | | 29,020 | | 7,037 | | 38,440 | | 22,817 | | | 98,603 | | 746,480 | | 516,667 | | 221,567 | | 615,270 | | 968,047 | Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | Other payables(Note 14) | | | | | | | | | | | | | Accounts payable | | 6,798 | | 2,681 | | | | 546 | | 6,798 | | 3,227 | Advances from customers | | | | 247,077 | | | | 9,236,170 | | | | 9,483,247 | Trade payables | | 67,443 | | 63,165 | | | | | | 67,443 | | 63,165 | Actuarial liabilities | | | | | | 514,368 | | 587,755 | | 514,368 | | 587,755 | | | 74,241 | | 312,923 | | 514,368 | | 9,824,471 | | 588,609 | | 10,137,394 | Statement of income | | | | | | | | | | | | | Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | | Sales | | 725,285 | | 1,177,860 | | | | | | | | | Interest | | 65,084 | | 50,631 | | | | | | | | | Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | Purchases | | (1,103,428) | | (1,047,423) | | | | | | | | | Interest | | (1,333) | | (423,621) | | | | | | | | | | | (314,392) | | (242,553) | | | | | | | | |
Companies | | Other payables | | Borrowings(1) | Trade payables | | Total | | Accounts payables | | Advances from customers(4) | | | Joint controlled entities | | | | | | | | | | Nacional Minérios S.A. | | 5,728 | | 3,374,528 | | 28,603 | | | 3,408,859 | MRS Logística S.A. | | 6,988 | | | | | 72 | | 7,060 | CBSI - Companhia Brasileira de Serviços e Infraestrutura | | | | | | | 3,796 | | 3,796 | CGPAR - Contrução Pesada S.A. | | | | | | | 2,454 | | 2,454 | Total at 12/31/2012 | | 12,716 | | 3,374,528 | | 28,603 | 6,322 | | 3,422,169 | Total at 12/31/2011 | | 8,966 | | 3,270,663 | | 25,567 | 7,085 | | 3,312,281 | | | | | | | | | | |
F-66
(1)· Nacional Minérios S.A. -By company
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Consolidated | | | Assets | | Liabilities | | Statement of Income |
| | Current | | Non-current | | Total | | Current | | Non-current | | Total | | Sales | | Purchases | | Finance income and costs. Net | | Total | |
|
|
Subsidiaries | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Ferrovia Transnordestina Logística S.A.(1) | | | | 133,283 | | 133,283 | | | | | | | | | | (4,559) | | 15,887 | | 11,328 | Others | | 14,151 | | | | 14,151 | | 2,742 | | | | 2,742 | | | | | | | | | | | 14,151 | | 133,283 | | 147,434 | | 2,742 | | | | 2,742 | | | | (4,559) | | 15,887 | | 11,328 | Joint ventures | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CGPAR Construção Pesada S.A. | | 3,484 | | | | 3,484 | | 24 | | | | 24 | | | | | | | | | Nacional Minérios S.A. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 113,563 | | (198,378) | | 6,424 | | (78,391) | MRS Logística S.A. | | 26,415 | | | | 26,415 | | 32,284 | | | | 32,284 | | | | (725,710) | | | | (725,710) | CBSI - Companhia Brasileira de Serviços e Infraestrutura | | 7,380 | | | | 7,380 | | 11,015 | | | | 11,015 | | 48 | | (166,945) | | | | (166,897) | Transnordestina Logística S.A(2) | | | | 222,727 | | 222,727 | | 26,880 | | | | 26,880 | | | | | | 23,380 | | 23,380 | | | 37,279 | | 222,727 | | 260,006 | | 70,203 | | - | | 70,203 | | 113,611 | | (1,091,033) | | 29,804 | | (947,618) | Other related parties | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | | | | CBS Previdência | | | | 114,433 | | 114,433 | | | | 514,368 | | 514,368 | | | | - | | | | - | Fundação CSN | | - | | - | | - | | 126 | | | | 126 | | | | (2,152) | | 3 | | (2,149) | Banco Fibra | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | | | 15,592 | | 15,592 | Usiminas | | 182 | | | | 182 | | | | | | - | | 12,289 | | (1,230) | | | | 11,059 | Panatlântica | | 46,991 | | | | 46,991 | | - | | | | - | | 597,998 | | | | | | 597,998 | Ibis Participações e Serviços | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | (4,324) | | | | (4,324) | Taquari Participações S.A. | | | | | | - | | | | | | - | | | | (130) | | | | (130) | | | 47,173 | | 114,433 | | 161,606 | | 126 | | 514,368 | | 514,494 | | 610,287 | | (7,836) | | 15,595 | | 618,046 | Associates | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Arvedi Metalfer do Brasil S.A. | | | | 46,224 | | 46,224 | | 1,170 | | | | 1,170 | | 1,387 | | | | 2,465 | | 3,852 | Total em 12/31/2015 | | 98,603 | | 516,667 | | 615,270 | | 74,241 | | 514,368 | | 588,609 | | 725,285 | | (1,103,428) | | 63,751 | | (314,392) | Total em 12/31/2014 | | 746,480 | | 221,567 | | 968,047 | | 312,923 | | 9,824,471 | | 10,137,394 | | 1,177,860 | | (1,047,423) | | (372,990) | | (242,553) |
1. Refers to loan with indirect subsidiaries Namisa Europe, Ldaloans of the subsidiary FTL - Ferrovia Transnordestina Logística S.A to the joint venture Transnordestina Logística S.A. The contract has a 102.5% of CDI interest rate and CSN Europe Lda Contractmaturity expected in US$June 2017. 2. Transnordestina Logística S.A: Refers mainly to contracts in R$: interest equivalent to 108.0% of 5.37% pa maturingCDI with final maturity in June 2015. On2017. As of December 31, 2012, the loans amounted to2015, borrowings total R$28,603222,727 (R$25,567141,358 as of December 31, 2011).2014) ·Profit or loss
Companies | | Revenue | | Expenses | | Sales | | Interest | | Total | | Purchases | | Interest | | Total | Jointly controlled entities | | | | | | | | | | | | | Nacional Minérios S.A. | | 563,203 | | 19,385 | | 582,588 | | 6,531 | | 397,991 | | 404,522 | MRS Logística S.A. | | | | | | | | 252,365 | | | | 252,365 | CBSI - Companhia Brasileira de Serviços e Infraestrutura | | | | | | | | 33,721 | | | | 33,721 | CGPAR - Contrução Pesada S.A. | | | | | | | | 7,972 | | | | 7,972 | Associates | | | | | | | | | | | | | Arvedi Metalfer do Brasil S.A. | | | | 87 | | 87 | | | | | | | Total em 12/31/2012 | | 563,203 | | 19,472 | | 582,675 | | 300,589 | | 397,991 | | 698,580 | Total em 12/31/2011 | | 378,020 | | 29,300 | | 407,320 | | 314,108 | | 389,059 | | 703,167 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The main transactions carried out by CSN with its subsidiaries and jointly controlled entities are sales and purchases of products and services, which include the supply of iron ore, steel, the provision of port services and railroad transportation, as well as the supply of electric power for operations.
c)19.c) Other unconsolidated related parties
· CBS Previdência The Company is the main sponsor of this non-profit entity established in July 1960, primarily engaged in the payment of benefits that supplement the official government Social Security benefits to participants. In its capacity as sponsor, CSN carries out transactions involving the payment of contributions and recognition of actuarial liabilities calculated in defined benefit plans, as detailed in note 28.27. · Fundação CSN The Company develops socially responsible policies concentrated today in Fundação CSN, of which it is the founding. The transactions between the parties relate to the operating and financial support for Fundação CSN to carry out the social projects undertaken mainly in the locations where the Company operates. FS-59
· Banco Fibra Banco Fibra is under the control structure of Vicunha Siderurgia and the financial transactions carried out with this bank are limited to current account operationsmovements in checking accounts and financial investments in fixed-income securities. F-67
· Ibis Participações e Serviços Ltda. Ibis Participações e Serviços is under the control of a Board member of the Company.Company’s Board. · Companhia de Gás do Ceará A natural gas distributor under the control structure of Vicunha Siderurgia. The balances and transactions between the Company and these entities are as follows:
I) Assets and liabilities
Companies | | Assets | | Liabilities | | Trade receivables | | Loans (1) / Banks | | Actuarial asset | | Total | | Accounts payables | | Actuarial liability | | Total | CBS Previdência (Nota 28) | | | | | | 93,546 | | 93,546 | | 26 | | 17,939 | | 17,965 | Fundação CSN | | 1,828 | | 903 | | | | 2,731 | | 88 | | | | 88 | Banco Fibra | | | | 72 | | | | 72 | | | | | | | Usiminas | | 10,802 | | | | | | 10,802 | | 52 | | | | 52 | Panatlântica | | 31,981 | | | | | | 31,981 | | | | | | | Companhia de Gás do Ceará | | | | | | | | | 53 | | | | 53 | Total at 12/31/2012 | | 44,611 | | 975 | | 93,546 | | 139,132 | | 219 | | 17,939 | | 18,158 | Total at 12/31/2011 | | 54,871 | | 72 | | | | 54,943 | | 531 | | 11,673 | | 12,204 |
(1)Fundação CSN – R$ contracts: interest equivalent to102% of CDI with final maturity in June2016. As of December 31, 2012, borrowings total R$903, of which R$154classified in short term and R$749 is classified in long term.
ii) Profit or loss
Companies | | Revenues | | Expenses | | Sales | | Interest | | Income from pension fund | | Total | | Expenses on pension fund | | Purchases / other expenses | | Total | CBS Previdência | | | | | | 36,355 | | 36,355 | | 11,618 | | | | 11,618 | Fundação CSN | | | | 3 | | | | 3 | | | | 2,048 | | 2,048 | Usiminas | | 79,571 | | | | | | 79,571 | | | | 1,692 | | 1,692 | Panatlântica | | 377,646 | | | | | | 377,646 | | | | | | | Ibis Participações e Serviços | | | | | | | | | | | | 7,255 | | 7,255 | Companhia de Gás do Ceará | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,187 | | 2,187 | Total at 12/31/2012 | | 457,217 | | 3 | | 36,355 | | 493,575 | | 11,618 | | 13,182 | | 24,800 | Total at 12/31/2011 | | 575,167 | | | | | | 575,167 | | 51,595 | | 22,152 | | 73,747 |
d)19.d) Key management personnel
The key management personnel who havewith authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling the Company’s activities, include the members of the Board of Directors and the executive officers.statutory directors. The following is information on the compensation of such personnel and the related balances as of December 31, 2012.2015. FS-60
| | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | | | Profit or loss | Short-term benefits for employees and officers | | 30,539 | | 28,226 | Post-employment benefits | | 115 | | 91 | Other long-term benefits | | n/a | | n/a | Severance benefits | | n/a | | n/a | Share-based compensation | | n/a | | n/a | | | 30,654 | | 28,317 | | | | | |
| | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | | | Statement of Income | Short-term benefits for employees and officers | | 47,578 | | 34,861 | Post-employment benefits | | 311 | | 116 | | | 47,889 | | 34,977 |
n/a – not applicable
e)20. Policy on investments and payment of interest on capital and dividends
At a meeting held on December 11, 2000, the Board of Directors decided to adopt a profit distribution policy which, after compliance with the provisions contained in 6,404/76, as amended by Law 9,457/97, will entail the distribution of all the profit to the Company’s shareholders, provided that the following priorities are preserved, irrespective of their order: (i) carrying out the business strategy; (ii) fulfilling its obligations; (iii) making the required investments; and (iv) maintaining a healthy financial situation of the Company.
19.SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
i.20.a) Paid-in capital
Fully subscribed and paid-in capital as of December 31, 20122015 and 2014 is R$4,540,000 (R$1,680,947 as of December 31, 2011) represented by 1,457,970,108 (1,457,970,108 as of December 31, 2011)comprising 1,387,524,047 book-entry common shares without par value. Each common share entitles its holder to one vote in Shareholders’ Meetings. ii.20.b) Authorized capital
The Company’s bylaws in effect as of December 31, 20122015 determine that the capital can be raised to up to 2,400,000,000 shares by decision of the Board of Directors. iii.20.c) Legal reserve
This reserve is recognized at the rate of 5% of the profit for each period, as provided for by Article 193 of Law 6,404/6.404/76, up to the ceiling of 20% of share capital. iv.20.d) Ownership structureTreasury shares
As of December 31, 2012, the Company did not have any treasury shares. v. Ownership structure
As ofDecember 31,2012,2015, the Company’s ownership structure was as follows:
| | | | | | 12/31/2015 | | | | | | 12/31/2014 | | | Number of common shares | | % of total shares | | % of voting capital | | Number of common shares | | % of total shares | | % of voting capital | Vicunha Aços S.A. (*) | | 697,719,990 | | 50.29% | | 51.41% | | 697,719,990 | | 50.29% | | 51.34% | Rio Iaco Participações S.A. (**) | | 58,193,503 | | 4.19% | | 4.29% | | 58,193,503 | | 4.19% | | 4.28% | Caixa Beneficente dos Empregados da CSN - CBS | | 20,143,031 | | 1.45% | | 1.48% | | 12,788,231 | | 0.92% | | 0.94% | BNDES Participações S.A. – BNDESPAR | | 8,794,890 | | 0.63% | | 0.65% | | 8,794,890 | | 0.63% | | 0.65% | NYSE (ADRs) | | 336,435,464 | | 24.25% | | 24.79% | | 342,466,899 | | 24.68% | | 25.20% | BM&FBovespa | | 235,846,169 | | 17.00% | | 17.38% | | 239,010,634 | | 17.23% | | 17.59% | | | 1,357,133,047 | | 97.81% | | 100.00% | | 1,358,974,147 | | 97.94% | | 100.00% | Treasury shares | | 30,391,000 | | 2.19% | | | | 28,549,900 | | 2.06% | | | Total shares | | 1,387,524,047 | | 100.00% | | | | 1,387,524,047 | | 100.00% | | |
FS-61F-68
| | | | 12/31/2012 | | | | 12/31/2011 | | | Number of common shares | | % of total shares | | Number of common shares | | % of total shares | Vicunha Siderurgia S.A. | | 697,719,990 | | 47.86% | | 697,719,990 | | 47.86% | Rio Iaco Participações S.A. (*) | | 58,193,503 | | 3.99% | | 58,193,503 | | 3.99% | Caixa Beneficente dos Empregados da CSN - CBS | | 12,788,231 | | 0.88% | | 12,788,231 | | 0.88% | BNDES Participações S.A. - BNDESPAR | | 27,509,316 | | 1.89% | | 31,773,516 | | 2.18% | JP Morgan Chase Bank - ADRs | | 342,997,950 | | 23.53% | | 373,772,695 | | 25.64% | BOVESPA | | 318,761,118 | | 21.85% | | 283,722,173 | | 19.45% | | | 1,457,970,108 | | 100.00% | | 1,457,970,108 | | 100.00% |
(*) As From June 30, 2015, CSN became directly controlled by Vicunha Aços, considering the incorporation of Vicunha Siderurgia by Vicunha Aços on that date. (**) Rio Iaco Participação S. A. is a company part of the control group. 20.e) Treasury shares
The Board of Directors authorized various share buyback programs in order to hold shares in treasury for subsequent disposal and/or cancelation with a view to maximizing the generation of value to the shareholder through an efficient capital structure management, as shown in the table below: | | | | | | | | | | | Program | Board’s Authorization | Authorized quantity | Program period | Average buyback price | Minimum and maximum buyback price | Number bought back | Share cancelation | | Balance in treasury | |
|
| 1º | 3/13/2014 | 70,205,661 | From 3/14/2014 to 4/14/2014 | R$ 9.34 | R$ 9.22 and R$ 9.45 | 2,350,000 | | | 2,350,000 | 2º | 4/15/2014 | 67,855,661 | From 4/16/2014 to 5/23/2014 | R$ 8.97 | R$ 8.70 and R$ 9.48 | 9,529,500 | | | 11,879,500 | 3º | 5/23/2014 | 58,326,161 | From 5/26/2014 to 6/25/2014 | R$ 9.21 | R$ 8.61 and R$ 9.72 | 31,544,500 | | | 43,424,000 | 4º | 6/26/2014 | 26,781,661 | From 6/26/2014 to 7/17/2014 | R$ 10.42 | R$ 9.33 and R$ 11.54 | 26,781,661 | | | 70,205,661 | | 7/18/2014 | | | Not applicable | Not applicable | | 60,000,000 | (1) | 10,205,661 | 5º | 7/18/2014 | 64,205,661 | From 7/18/2014 to 8/18/2014 | R$ 11.40 | R$ 11.40 | 240,400 | | | 10,446,061 | | 8/18/2014 | | | Not applicable | Not applicable | | 10,446,061 | (1) | | 6º | 8/18/2014 | 63,161,055 | From 8/19/2014 to 9/25/2014 | R$ 9.82 | R$ 9.47 and R$ 10.07 | 6,791,300 | | | 6,791,300 | 7º | 9/29/2014 | 56,369,755 | From 9/29/2014 to 2/29/2014 | R$ 7.49 | R$ 4.48 and R$ 9.16 | 21,758,600 | | | 28,549,900 | 8º | 12/30/2014 | 34,611,155 | From 12/31/2014 to 3/31/2015 | R$ 5.10 | R$ 4.90 and R$ 5.39 | 1,841,100 | | | 30,391,000 | 9º (*) | 03/31/2015 | 32,770,055 | From 4/01/2015 to 6/30/2015 | | | | | | |
(*) There were no share buyback in this program. (1) On July 18, 2014 and August 19, 2014, the Board of Directors approved the cancelation of 60,000,000 and 10,446,061 treasury shares, respectively, without change in the Company’s share capital. As of December 31, 2015, the position of the treasury shares was as follows: Bought back | | Amount | | Share price | | Share | number | | paid for | | | | | | | | market price | (in units) | | the shares | | Minimum | | Maximum | | Average | | as of 12/31/2015 (*) | 30,391,000 |
| R$ 238,976 | | R$ 4.48 | | R$ 10.07 | | R$ 7.86 | | R$ 121,564 |
(*) Using the last share quotation on BM&FBovespa as of December 31, 2015 of R$4.00 per share. 20.20.f) Policy on investments and payment of interest on capital and dividends
At a meeting held on December 11, 2000, the Board of Directors decided to adopt a profit distribution policy which, after compliance with the provisions in Law 6.404/76, as amended by Law 9.457/97, will entail the distribution of all the profit to the Company’s shareholders, provided that the following priorities are observed, irrespective of their order: (i) carrying out the business strategy; (ii) fulfilling its obligations; (iii) making the required investments; and (iv) maintaining a healthy financial situation of the Company. F-69
20.g) Earnings/(loss) per share: Basic earnings per share were calculated based on the profit attributable to the owners of CSN divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year, excluding the common shares purchased and held as treasury shares, as follows: | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | | 12/31/2013 | | CommonShares | (Loss) profit for the year, net | | | | | | Attributable to owners of the Company | 1,257,896 | | (105,218) | | 509,025 | Weighted average number of shares | 1,357,150 | | 1,413,697 | | 1,457,970 | Basic and diluted EPS | 0.92687 | | (0.07443) | | 0.34913 |
21. PAYMENT TO SHAREHOLDERS
The Company's Bylaws provides for a minimum dividend distribution 25% of adjusted net income as provided by law, the holders of its shares. On March 11, 2015 the Board of Directors approved the proposal for payment, as advance of mandatory minimum dividend concerning the period 2015, from the retained earnings reserve (statutory working capital reserve), the amount of R$275,000 in dividends, corresponding to R$0,202633043. The dividends were paid as from March 19, 2015, without inflation adjustment. Dividends are calculated pursuant to the Company’s bylaws and in compliance with the Brazilian Corporate Law. The table below shows the calculation of dividends and interest on capital approved for 2015: | | 12/31/20122015 | Profit (loss) for the year | | (420,113)1,257,896
| Reversal of InvestmentCapital reserve
| | 776,549
| Reversal of statutory working capital reserve
| | 503,564(62,895)
| Profit for allocation | | 860,0001,195,001
| | | | Proposed allocation:
| | | Approved dividendsAllocation:
| | 300,000
| InterestDividends approved on capital proposedMarch 11, 2015
| | 560,000(275,000)
| Destined to profits reserve to be realized (*) | | (23,750) | Transferred to statutory reserve for investment and working capital | | (896,251) | | | | In current liabilities | | | TotalBalance of dividends and interestpayable as December 31, 2014
| | 277,097 | Dividends approved on capitalMarch 11, 2015 | | 275,000 | Dividends paid in 2015 | | (549,835) | Balance of dividends payable as December 31, 2015 | | 860,0002,262
| | | | Weighted average number of shares | | 1,457,9701,357,150
| Dividends and interest on capital per share approved | | (0.58986)0.20263
|
21.INTEREST ON CAPITAL(*) The Company's management, supported by art. 197 of Law 6.404 / 76, is proposing ad referendum to the Annual General Meeting, in order to retain part of the minimum mandatory dividends in line account item Profit Reserve to realize, as there is no profit realized in 2015 year.
F-70
The tables below show the Boardhistory of Directors´approveddividendsand interest on capital payment amounting to R$560,000.approved and paid: The calculation of interest on capital is based on the Long-Term Interest Rate (TJLP) fluctuation on shareholders' equity, limited to 50% of pretax profit for the period or the higher of 50% of retained earnings and profit reserves, might being used the higher of these two limits according to prevailing legislation.
22. NET SALES REVENUE Net sales revenue is comprised as follows: | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | | 12/31/2013 | Gross revenue | | | | | | | | | | | Domestic market | | 13,784,307 | | 13,366,345 | | 10,313,874 | | 13,061,229 | | 14,635,703 | Foreign market | | 6,444,540 | | 6,417,397 | | 7,726,761 | | 6,247,489 | | 6,143,242 | | | 20,228,847 | | 19,783,742 | | 18,040,635 | | 19,308,718 | | 20,778,945 | Deductions | | | | | | | | | | | Cancelled sales and discounts | | (345,914) | | (257,888) | | (308,029) | | (167,483) | | (206,109) | Taxes levied on sales | | (2,986,669) | | (3,006,270) | | Taxes on sales | | | (2,400,754) | | (3,015,003) | | (3,260,404) | | | (3,332,583) | | (3,264,158) | | (2,708,783) | | (3,182,486) | | (3,466,513) | Net revenue | | 16,896,264 | | 16,519,584 | | 15,331,852 | | 16,126,232 | | 17,312,432 | | | | | | |
23.EXPENSES BY NATURE
| | | | | | | | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | | 12/31/2013 | Raw materials and inputs | | (4,902,546) | | (5,125,417) | | (5,998,881) | Labor cost | | (1,900,260) | | (1,716,995) | | (1,590,892) | Supplies | | (1,097,814) | | (1,097,940) | | (1,145,772) | Maintenance cost (services and materials) | | (1,072,437) | | (1,072,664) | | (1,297,377) | Outsourcing services | | (3,292,763) | | (2,544,553) | | (2,117,701) | Depreciation, amortization and depletion (Note 10 a) | (1,135,772) | | (1,245,131) | | (1,093,830) | Other | | (304,534) | | (270,040) | | (538,218) | | | (13,706,126) | | (13,072,740) | | (13,782,671) | | | | | | | | Classified as: | | | | | | | Cost of sales | | (11,799,758) | | (11,592,382) | | (12,422,706) | Selling expenses | | (1,436,000) | | (1,041,975) | | (874,875) | General and administrative expenses | | (470,368) | | (438,383) | | (485,090) | | | (13,706,126) | | (13,072,740) | | (13,782,671) |
FS-62F-71
24.OTHER OPERATING INCOME (EXPENSES)
| | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | | 12/31/2013 | Other operating income | | | | | | | Indemnities/gains on lawsuits | | 5,189 | | 39,693 | | 51,737 | Rentals and leases | | 1,150 | | 1,080 | | 817 | Reversal of provisions | | 5,020 | | 20,790 | | 7,972 | Dividends received | | 5,794 | | 328 | | | Untimely PIS/COFINS/ICMS credits | | 234,287 | | | | 404 | Contractual fines | | 2,200 | | 7,963 | | | Gain on loss of control over Transnordestina | | | | | | 473,899 | Gain on business combination (note 3) | | 3,413,033 | | | | | Reversal of actuarial liability/provision for actuarial asset | | 8,702 | | 166 | | 985 | Other revenues | | 50,507 | | 20,468 | | 30,249 | | | 3,725,882 | | 90,488 | | 566,063 | | | | | | | | Other operating expenses | | | | | | | Taxes and fees | | (18,282) | | (57,711) | | (103,446) | Write-off of judicial deposits | | (24,145) | | (77,892) | | | Provision for environmental risks | | (41,697) | | 160,980 | | | Provision for tax, social security, labor, civil and environmental risks, net of reversals | | (279,619) | | (191,127) | | (254,062) | Contractual fines | | (309) | | (7,464) | | (6,479) | Depreciation of unused equipment and amortization of intangible assets (Note 10 a) | | (41,068) | | (36,354) | | (61,763) | Residual value of permanent assets written off (Note 10) | | (6,466) | | (15,232) | | (31,660) | Provision for losses /reversals of slow-moving and obsolescence (Note 7) | | 1,154 | | (10,396) | | 5,975 | Losses on spare parts | | (55,790) | | (26,432) | | | Studies and project engineering expenses | | (38,138) | | (48,807) | | (89,878) | Research and development expenses | | (3,363) | | (3,406) | | (5,810) | Impairment loss adjustment | | | | | | (48,469) | Healthcare plan expenses | | (56,838) | | (54,319) | | (55,720) | Impairment of available-for-sale financial assets | | (555,298) | | (205,000) | | (5,002) | REFIS effect - Law 11,941/09 and Law 12,865/13, net | | (4,801) | | (37,308) | | (129,743) | Impairment of the Transnordestina old railway network | | | | | | (216,446) | Provisions for industrial restructuring | | (122,854) | | | | | Other expenses | | (86,817) | | (46,659) | | (131,705) | | | (1,334,331) | | (657,127) | | (1,134,208) | Other operating expenses, net | | 2,391,551 | | (566,639) | | (568,145) |
F-72
23.EXPENSES BY NATURE
| | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | Raw materials and inputs | | (4,941,134) | | (3,927,105) | Labor cost | | (1,582,481) | | (1,647,545) | Supplies | | (1,107,955) | | (1,084,440) | Maintenance cost (services and materials) | | (1,219,385) | | (969,376) | Outsourcing services | | (2,975,992) | | (1,981,025) | Depreciation, amortization and depletion (Note 10 b) | | (1,215,854) | | (929,368) | Other (*) | | (537,444) | | (441,678) | | | (13,580,245) | | (10,980,537) | | | | | | Classified as: | | | | | Cost of sales (Note 26) | | (12,072,206) | | (9,800,844) | Selling expenses (Note 26) | | (931,525) | | (604,108) | General and administrative expenses (Note 26) | | (576,514) | | (575,585) | | | (13,580,245) | | (10,980,537) | | | | | |
(*) Includes increase/reduction in finished goods and work in process, and sundry expenses of the group of plant administrative expenses.
24.OTHER OPERATING INCOME (EXPENSES)
| | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | Other operating income | | | | | Sale of Riversdale shares (Note 9) | | | | 698,164 | Sale of securities | | | | | Reversal of actuarial liability/provision for actuarial asset | | 43,749 | | | Reversal of provisions | | 1,953 | | 3,091 | Dividends received from third parties | | 301 | | 14,199 | Other Income | | | | 3,723 | | | 46,003 | | 719,177 | | | | | | Other operating expenses | | | | | Taxes and fees | | (94,846) | | (37,499) | Effect of REFIS - Law 11,941/09 and MP 470/09 | | | | (16,119) | Provision for tax, social security, labor, civil and environmental risks, net of reversals | (280,113) | | (75,823) | Contractual, nondeductible fines | | (61,396) | | (45,537) | Depreciation of unused equipment | | (14,797) | | (33,674) | Residual value of permanent assets written off | | (5,246) | | (62,917) | Allowance for inventory losses | | (16,082) | | (22,203) | Research and development costs | | (61,053) | | (42,050) | Pension plan expenses | | (5,256) | | (62,313) | Healthcare plan expenses (Note 28 e) | | (51,234) | | (42,306) | Impairment adjustment | | | | (60,861) | Impairment of available-for-sale assets (Note 13 II) | | (2,022,793) | | | Amortization of purchase price allocation - business combination | | (60,745) | | | Other expenses | | (45,812) | | | | | (2,719,373) | | (501,302) | Other operating income (expenses) | | (2,673,370) | | 217,875 | | | | | |
FS-63
25. FINANCE INCOME (COSTS) | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | Finance income | | | | | Related parties (Note 18 b and c) | | 19,475 | | 29,300 | Income from short-term investments | | 237,865 | | 538,882 | Net effect of REFIS - Law 11,941/09 and MP 470/09 | | 115,457 | | | Other income | | 43,984 | | 149,268 | | | 416,781 | | 717,450 | Finance costs | | | | | Borrowings and financing - foreign currency | | (709,688) | | (639,197) | Borrowings and financing - local currency | | (1,550,942) | | (1,622,365) | Related parties (Note 18 b) | | (397,991) | | (389,059) | Capitalized interest (Notes 10 and 32) | | 409,498 | | 353,156 | Losses on derivatives (*) | | (9,166) | | (20,594) | Net effect of REFIS - Law 11,941/09 and MP 470/09 | | | | (77,335) | Interest, fines and late payment charges | | (158,936) | | (264,359) | Other finance costs | | (177,715) | | (224,168) | | | (2,594,940) | | (2,883,921) | Inflation adjustment and exchange gains (losses), net | | | Inflation adjustments | | (144,446) | | (37,451) | Exchange differences | | 326,009 | | 286,074 | Exchange gains (losses) on derivatives (*) | | 4,191 | | (87,955) | | | 185,754 | | 160,668 | | | | | | Finance costs, net | | (1,992,405) | | (2,005,803) | | | | | | (*) Statement of gains and losses on derivative transactions | | | Dollar to real swap | | 17,065 | | (115,490) | Euro to dollar swap | | (5,116) | | 9,574 | Dollar to euro swap | | (8,065) | | 16,501 | Yen to dollar swap | | 307 | | 1,460 | | | 4,191 | | (87,955) | Libor to CDI swap | | (9,166) | | (20,594) | | | (9,166) | | (20,594) | | | (4,975) | | (108,549) | | | | | |
| | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | | 12/31/2013 | Finance income | | | | | | | Related parties (Note 19 b) | | 65,084 | | 50,631 | | 25,576 | Income from short-term investments | | 216,971 | | 82,103 | | 125,685 | Gain form derivative (*) | | 870 | | | | | Other income (**) | | 209,062 | | 38,818 | | 20,723 | | | 491,987 | | 171,552 | | 171,984 | Finance costs | | | | | | | Borrowings and financing - foreign currency | | (938,047) | | (718,281) | | (743,276) | Borrowings and financing - local currency | | (2,116,149) | | (1,806,568) | | (1,559,312) | Related parties (Note 19 b) | | (1,333) | | (423,621) | | (421,659) | Capitalized interest (Notes 10 and 31) | | 166,366 | | 165,789 | | 490,747 | Losses on derivatives (*) | | (4,956) | | (4,869) | | (21,643) | Interest, fines and late payment charges | | (20,560) | | (76,704) | | (72,065) | REFIS effect net- Law 11,941/09 | | | | (52,036) | | (277,032) | Other finance costs | | (210,568) | | (187,688) | | (135,500) | | | (3,125,247) | | (3,103,978) | | (2,739,740) | Inflation adjustment and exchange differences, net | | | | | | | Inflation adjustments, net | | 44,412 | | (109) | | (37,858) | Exchange differences, net | | (1,630,530) | | (391,767) | | 97,969 | Exchange gain (losses) on derivatives (*) | | 846,328 | | 242,869 | | (3,954) | | | (739,790) | | (149,007) | | 56,157 | | | | | | | | Finance costs, net | | (3,373,050) | | (3,081,433) | | (2,511,599) | | | | | | | | (*) Statement of gains and (losses) on derivative transactions | | | | | | Dollar-to-CDI swap | | (18) | | (12,735) | | 11,172 | Dollar-to-real swap (NDF) | | 785,702 | | 213,602 | | (597) | Future Dollar | | 25,381 | | | | (13,190) | Dollar-to-euro swap (NDF) | | 39,668 | | 33,397 | | 4,035 | Dollar-to-euro swap | | (4,405) | | 8,605 | | (5,374) | | | 846,328 | | 242,869 | | (3,954) | Libor-to-CDI swap | | | | (943) | | (4,268) | Fixed rate-to-CDI swap | | (4,956) | | (3,926) | | (17,375) | CDI-to-Fixed rate swap | | 870 | | | | | | | (4,086) | | (4,869) | | (21,643) | | | 842,242 | | 238,000 | | (25,597) |
(*) It refers mainly to gain on repurchase of debt securities amounting to R$166,642.
26. SEGMENT INFORMATION According to the Group’s structure, its businesses are distributed into five (5) operating segments. · Steel The Steel Segment consolidates all the operations related to the production, distribution and sale of flat steel, long steel, metallic packagingcontainers and galvanized steel, with operations in Brazil, the United States, Portugal and Germany. This segmentThe Segment supplies the following markets: construction, steel packagingcontainers for the Brazilian chemical and food industries, home appliances, automobile and OEM (motors and compressors). The Company’s steel units produce hot and cold rolled steel, galvanized and pre-painted steel of great durability. They also produce tinplate, a raw material used to produce metallic packaging.containers. F-73
Overseas, Lusosider, which is based in Portugal, also produces metal sheets, as well as galvanized steel. CSN LLC in the U.S.A. meets local market needs by supplying cold rolled and galvanized steel. In January 2012, CSN acquired Stahlwerk Thüringen (SWT), a manufacturer of long steel located in Unterwellenborn, Germany. SWT is specialized inthe production of shapes used for construction and has an installed production capacity of 1.1 million metric tons of steel per steel/year. FS-64
For 2013, it is slated to beginIn January 2014 the production of long steel products. The initial production slated,products started with a capacity of 500,000 metric tons per year, which will consolidate the company as a source of complete construction solutions, complementing its portfolio of products with high value added value in the steel chain.
· Mining This segment encompasses the activities of iron ore and tin mining. The high–high quality iron ore operations are located in the Iron Quadrilateral in MG, the Casa de Pedra mine in Congonhas, MG, that produces high quality iron ore, as well as the jointly controlled entity NacionalCongonhas Minérios S.A. (Namisa), which has its own mines alsoand sells third party iron ore. At the end of excellent quality,2015, CSN and also sells third-partythe Asian Consortium formalized a shareholders' agreement for the combination of assets linked to iron ore. Furthermore,ore operations and the related logistics structure, forming a new company that has focused in mining activities from December 2015. In this context, the new company, called Congonhas Minérios S.A., holds the TECAR concession, the Casa de Pedra mine and all the shares of Namisa, which was incorporated on December 31, 2015. Moreover, CSN also controls a Estanho de Rondônia S.A. (ERSA), a company that has bothmining units and tin mining and casting units. CSN holds the concession to operate TECAR, a solid bulk terminal, one of the 4 (four) terminals that comprise the Itaguaí Port, in Rio de Janeiro. Importations of coal and coke are carried out through this terminal.casting.
· Logistics i. Railroad
CSN has equity interests in twothree railroad companies: MRS Logística, S.A., in which we share control, which manages the former Southeast Network of Rede Ferroviária Federal S.A. (RFFSA), andour controlled subsidiaryTransnordestina Logística S.A. and FTL - Ferrovia Transnordestina Logística S.A. , which operatesoperate the former Northeast Network of the RFFSA in the states of Maranhão, Piauí, Ceará, Rio Grande do Norte, Paraíba, Pernambuco and Alagoas. a) MRS The railroad transportation services provided by MRS are based onfundamental to the supply of raw materials and the shipment of final products. The total amount of iron ore, coal and coke consumed by the Presidente Vargas Mill is carried by MRS, as iswell as part of the steel produced by CSN for the domestic market and for export.export are carried by MRS. The Southeast Brazilian railroad system, encompassing 1,674 kilometers of tracks, serves the tri-state industrial area of São Paulo-Rio de Janeiro-Minas Gerais, linking the mines located in Minas Gerais to the ports located in São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, and the steel mills of CSN, Companhia Siderúrgica Paulista, (or Cosipa)or Cosipa, and Gerdau Açominas. Besides serving other customers, the railroad system carries iron ore from the Company’s mines in Casa de Pedra, Minas Gerais, and coke and coal from the Itaguaí Port, in Rio de Janeiro, to Volta Redonda, and carries CSN’s export products to the ports of Itaguaí and Rio de Janeiro. Its volumes of cargo carried account for approximately 28% of the total volume carried by the Southeast railroad system. b) Transnordestina LogísticaTLSA and FTL TLSA and FTL hold the concession of the former RFFSA’s Northeast Network. The Northeast Network totals 4,238 km, divided into two sections: i) Network I, which comprises the São Luiz–Mucuripe, Arrojado–Recife, Itabaiana–Cabedelo, Paula Cavalcante–Macau–Recife, and Propriá–Jorge Lins (Network I) sections, whose concession goes until 2027, held by FTL; and ii) Network II, which comprises the Missão Velha–Salgueiro, Salgueiro–Trindade, Trindade– Eliseu Martins, Salgueiro–Porto de Suape, and Missão Velha–Porto de Pecém sections, whose concession goes until 2057 or until the return of the investment adjusted by 6.75% of the sections, held by TLSA. Together, CSN and the federal government are making investments for implementation of the Transnordestina Project for construction of around 1,728 km of new lines. The work on this project includes complementing and renewing part of the infrastructure (or lines) of the concession held by Transnordestina Logística, which will be expanded from the nearly 2,600 kilometers of track presently operating to around 4,300 kilometers.
F-74
Transnordestina Logística S.A. has a 30-year concession granted in 1998 to operate the Northeastern Brazil railroad system. This railway system covers 4,238 kilometers of railroads in the states of Maranhão, Piauí, Ceará, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Alagoas and Rio Grande do Norte. Moreover, it
The Network links up with the main ports in the region, thus providingoffering an important competitive advantage by means of opportunities for combined transportation solutions and logistics projects tailored to customer needs. The project underway will increase the transportation capacity of Transnordestina Logística 20-fold, bringing it up the level of the most modern railroads in the entire world.
FS-65
II. Port Logistics With its new configuration, Transnordestina will become the best logistics option for export of grains through the Pecém and Suape ports, as well as other solid bulk cargos such as iron ore from the Northeast Region, playing an important role in the region’s development.
ii. Ports
The Port logistics segmentLogistics Segment consolidates the operation of the terminal built during the post-privatization period of the ports, Sepetiba Tecon.Tecon.. The Sepetiba terminal features complete infrastructure to meet all the needs of exporters, importers and ship-owners.ship owners. Its installed capacity exceeds that of most other Brazilian terminals. It has excellent depths of 14.5 meters in the mooring berths and a huge storage area, as well as the most modern and appropriate equipment, systems and intermodal connections. The Company’s constant investment in projects in the terminals consolidates the Itaguaí Port Complex as one of the most modern in Brazil, at present with capacity for handling 480 thousand containers and 30 million metric tons per year of bulk cargo. · Energy CSN is one of the largest industrial consumers of electric power in Brazil. As energy is fundamental toin its production process, the Company invests in assets for generation of electric power to guarantee its self-sufficiency. These assets are as follows: Itá hydroelectric power plant, in the State of Santa Catarina, with rated capacity of 1,450 MW, where CSN has a share of 29.5%; Igarapava hydroelectric power plant, Minas Gerais, with rated capacity of 210 MW, in which CSN holds 17.9% of the capital; and a thermoelectric co-generation Central Unitunit with rated capacity of 238 MW, which has been operating at the UPV since 1999. For fuel the Central Unit uses the residual gases produced by the steel mill itself. Through these three power generation assets, CSN obtains total rated capacity of 430 MW. · Cement The cement division consolidates the Company’s cement production, distribution and salessale operations, which use the slag produced by the Volta Redonda plant’s blast furnaces. In 2011, the clinker used in cement production was acquired from third parties; however, at the end of 2011, with the completion of the first stage of the Arcos Clinker plant, MG, this plant already supplied the milling needs of CSN Cimentos in Volta Redonda. The information presented to Management regarding the performance of each business segment is generally derived directly from the accounting records, combined with some intercompany allocations. · Sales by geographic area Sales by geographic area are determined based on the customers’ location. On a consolidated basis, domestic sales are represented by revenues from customers located in Brazil and export sales are represented by revenues from customers located abroad. ·Profit per segment Beginning 2013, the Company no longer proportionately consolidates joint ventures Namisa, MRS and CBSI. For segment information preparation and presentation purposes, Management decided to maintain the proportionate consolidation of the joint ventures, as historically presented. For consolidated profit reconciliation purposes, the amounts of these companies were eliminated in the column “Corporate expenses/elimination”. For the 2015 closure, after the combination of mining assets (Casa de Pedra, Namisa and Tecar), the consolidated results shall consider all of this new company. FS-66F-75
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/31/2012 | | | Steel | | Mining | | Logistics | | | | Energy | | Cement | | Corporate expenses/ elimination | | Consolidated | | | | | Ports | | Railroads | | | | | Profit or loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Metric tons (thou.) - (unaudited) (*) | | 5,828,718 | | 20,181,321 | | | | | | | | 1,972,020 | | | | | Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Domestic market | | 8,478,244 | | 713,445 | | 151,514 | | 1,066,756 | | 228,667 | | 387,672 | | (530,657) | | 10,495,641 | Foreign market | | 2,324,038 | | 3,772,104 | | | | | | | | | | 304,481 | | 6,400,623 | | | 10,802,282 | | 4,485,549 | | 151,514 | | 1,066,756 | | 228,667 | | 387,672 | | (226,176) | | 16,896,264 | Cost of sales and services (Note 23) | | (8,867,820) | | (2,449,839) | | (82,585) | | (729,684) | | (153,031) | | (286,316) | | 497,069 | | (12,072,206) | Gross profit | | 1,934,462 | | 2,035,710 | | 68,929 | | 337,072 | | 75,636 | | 101,356 | | 270,893 | | 4,824,058 | General and administrative expenses (Note 23) | | (616,976) | | (59,404) | | (20,482) | | (95,246) | | (21,792) | | (68,195) | | (625,944) | | (1,508,039) | Depreciation (Note 10 b) | | 750,507 | | 190,019 | | 6,653 | | 139,386 | | 17,238 | | 26,902 | | 85,149 | | 1,215,854 | Adjusted EBITDA | | 2,067,993 | | 2,166,325 | | 55,100 | | 381,212 | | 71,082 | | 60,063 | | (269,902) | | 4,531,873 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/31/2012 | | | Steel | | Mining | | Logistics | | | | Energy | | Cement | | Corporate expenses/ elimination | | Consolidated | | | | | Ports | | Railroads | | | | | Sales by geographic area | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Asia | | 30,495 | | 2,971,131 | | | | | | | | | | 239,707 | | 3,241,333 | North America | | 585,505 | | 16,589 | | | | | | | | | | 3,381 | | 605,475 | Latin America | | 203,069 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 203,069 | Europe | | 1,491,195 | | 784,384 | | | | | | | | | | 71,268 | | 2,346,847 | Other | | 13,774 | | | | | | | | | | | | (9,875) | | 3,899 | Foreign market | | 2,324,038 | | 3,772,104 | |
| |
| |
| |
| | 304,481 | | 6,400,623 | Domestic market | | 8,478,244 | | 713,445 | | 151,514 | | 1,066,756 | | 228,667 | | 387,672 | | (530,657) | | 10,495,641 | TOTAL | | 10,802,282 | | 4,485,549 | | 151,514 | | 1,066,756 | | 228,667 | | 387,672 | | (226,176) | | 16,896,264 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/31/2011 | | | Steel | | Mining | | Logistics | | | | Energy | | Cement | | Corporate expenses/ elimination | | Consolidated | | | | | Ports | | Railroads | | | | | Profit or loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Metric tons (thou.) - (unaudited) (*) | | 4,895,581 | | 23,849,514 | | | | | | | | 1,754,596 | | | | | Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Domestic market | | 8,190,463 | | 834,144 | | 142,778 | | 1,022,885 | | 183,492 | | 332,950 | | (564,796) | | 10,141,916 | Foreign market | | 1,287,274 | | 5,021,814 | | | | | | | | | | 68,580 | | 6,377,668 | | | 9,477,737 | | 5,855,958 | | 142,778 | | 1,022,885 | | 183,492 | | 332,950 | | (496,216) | | 16,519,584 | Cost of sales and services (Note 23) | | (7,038,168) | | (2,185,149) | | (85,474) | | (667,186) | | (105,497) | | (268,432) | | 549,062 | | (9,800,844) | Gross profit | | 2,439,569 | | 3,670,809 | | 57,304 | | 355,699 | | 77,995 | | 64,518 | | 52,846 | | 6,718,740 | General and administrative expenses (Note 23) | | (471,003) | | (63,967) | | (18,303) | | (90,020) | | (25,408) | | (67,712) | | (443,280) | | (1,179,693) | Depreciation (Note 10 b) | | 606,810 | | 161,655 | | 5,674 | | 105,454 | | 22,495 | | 23,222 | | 4,058 | | 929,368 | Adjusted EBITDA | | 2,575,376 | | 3,768,497 | | 44,675 | | 371,133 | | 75,082 | | 20,028 | | (386,376) | | 6,468,415 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/31/2011 | | | Steel | | Mining | | Logistics | | | | Energy | | Cement | | Corporate expenses/ elimination | | Consolidated | | | | | Ports | | Railroads | | | | | Sales by geographic area | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Asia | | 31,255 | | 4,188,229 | | | | | | | | | | 61,774 | | 4,281,258 | North America | | 502,486 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 502,486 | Latin America | | 147,363 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 147,363 | Europe | | 560,880 | | 833,585 | | | �� | | | | | | | 24,120 | | 1,418,585 | Other | | 45,290 | | | | | | | | | | | | (17,314) | | 27,976 | Foreign market | | 1,287,274 | | 5,021,814 | |
| |
| |
| |
| | 68,580 | | 6,377,668 | Domestic market | | 8,190,463 | | 834,144 | | 142,778 | | 1,022,885 | | 183,492 | | 332,950 | | (564,796) | | 10,141,916 | TOTAL | | 9,477,737 | | 5,855,958 | | 142,778 | | 1,022,885 | | 183,492 | | 332,950 | | (496,216) | | 16,519,584 |
FS-67
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/31/2010 | | | Steel | | Mining | | Logistics | | | | Energy | | Cement | | Corporate expenses/ elimination | | Consolidated | | | | | Ports | | Railroad | | | | | Profit or loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Metric tons (thou.) - (unaudited) (*) | | 4,795,851 | | 18,554,984 | | | | | | | | 991,789 | | | | | Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Domestic market | | 8,763,470 | | 573,976 | | 119,315 | | 838,436 | | 113,517 | | 201,841 | | (363,750) | | 10,246,805 | Foreign market | | 1,162,539 | | 3,041,166 | | | | | | | | | | | | 4,203,705 | Cost of sales and services | | (6,225,820) | | (1,252,474) | | (70,046) | | (521,747) | | (41,579) | | (163,631) | | 392,571 | | (7,882,726) | Gross profit | | 3,700,189 | | 2,362,668 | | 49,269 | | 316,689 | | 71,938 | | 38,210 | | 28,821 | | 6,567,784 | Selling and administrative expenses | | (443,100) | | (69,068) | | (16,590) | | (70,644) | | (25,555) | | (43,119) | | (350,759) | | (1,018,835) | Depreciation | | 519,411 | | 145,817 | | 5,577 | | 102,629 | | 22,501 | | 13,648 | | (3,414) | | 806,169 | Adjusted EBITDA | | 3,776,500 | | 2,439,417 | | 38,256 | | 348,674 | | 68,884 | | 8,739 | | (325,352) | | 6,355,118 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/31/2010 | | | Steel | | Mining | | Logistics | | | | Energy | | Cement | | Corporate expenses/ elimination | | Consolidated | | | | | Ports | | Railroad | | | | | Sales by geographical area | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Asia | | 40,752 | | 2,513,499 | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,554,251 | North America | | 432,229 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 432,229 | Latin America | | 193,692 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 193,692 | Europe | | 454,997 | | 527,667 | | | | | | | | | | | | 982,664 | Other | | 40,869 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 40,869 | Foreign market | | 1,162,539 | | 3,041,166 | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | 4,203,705 | Domestic market | | 8,763,470 | | 573,976 | | 119,315 | | 838,436 | | 113,517 | | 201,841 | | (363,750) | | 10,246,805 | TOTAL | | 9,926,009 | | 3,615,142 | | 119,315 | | 838,436 | | 113,517 | | 201,841 | | (363,750) | | 14,450,510 |
(*) The ore sales volumes presented in this note take into consideration Company sales and the interest in its subsidiaries and jointly controlled entities (Namisajoint ventures, corresponding Namisa 60%). from January to November and Namisa 100% on December. Adjusted EBITDA is the toolmeasurement based on which the chief operating decision maker measuresassesses the segment performance and the capacity to generate recurring operating cash, and consistsconsisting of profit for the year less net finance income (costs), income tax and social contribution, depreciation and amortization, shareequity in results of profits of investments,affiliated companies, and other operating income (expenses). , plus the proportionate EBITDA of joint ventures. F-76
Even though it is an indicator used in segment performance measurements,measurement, EBITDA is not a measurement recognized by accounting practices adopted in Brazil or IFRS,IFRS; it does not have a standard definition, and may not be comparable with measurements using similar names provided by other entities. As required by IFRS 8, the table below shows the reconciliation of the measurement used by the chief operating decision maker with the results determined using the accounting practices.practices: | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | | 12/31/2013 | (Loss) profit for the year | | 1,615,951 | | (112,267) | | 533,994 | Depreciation (Note 10 a) | | 1,135,772 | | 1,245,131 | | 1,093,830 | Income tax and social contribution (Note 15) | | 188,624 | | (151,153) | | 74,161 | Finance income (cost) (Note 25) | | 3,373,050 | | 3,081,433 | | 2,511,599 | EBITDA | | 6,313,397 | | 4,063,144 | | 4,213,584 | Other operating income (expenses) (Note 24) | | (2,391,551) | | 566,639 | | 568,145 | Equity in results of affiliated companies | | (1,160,348) | | (331,160) | | (158,138) | Proportionate EBITDA of joint ventures | | 489,922 | | 430,547 | | 780,606 | Adjusted EBITDA (*) | | 3,251,420 | | 4,729,170 | | 5,404,197 |
(*) The Company discloses its adjusted EBITDA net of its share of investments and other operating income (expenses) because it understands that these should not be included in the calculation of recurring operating cash generation. | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | (Loss)/Profit for the year | | (480,574) | | 3,667,234 | Depreciation (Note 10 b) | | 1,215,854 | | 929,368 | Income tax and social contribution (Note 8) | | (870,134) | | 83,885 | Finance income (Note 25) | | 1,992,405 | | 2,005,803 | EBITDA | | 1,857,551 | | 6,686,290 | Other operating income (expenses) (Note 24) | | 2,673,370 | | (217,875) | Share of profits of investees | | 952 | | | Adjusted EBITDA | | 4,531,873 | | 6,468,415 | | | | | |
27. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE (EPS) Basic earnings (loss) per share:
Basic earnings (loss) per share have been calculated based on the profit attributable to the owners of CSN divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year (after the stock split), excluding the common shares purchased and held as treasury shares, as follows:
FS-68
| 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | | Common shares | Profit (loss) for the year | | | | Attributed to owners of the Company | (420,113) | | 3,706,033 | Weighted average number of shares | 1,457,970 | | 1,457,970 | Basic and diluted EPS | (0.28815) | | 2.54191 |
28.EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
The pension plans granted by the Company cover substantially all employees. The plans are administered by Caixa Beneficente dos Empregados da CSN (‘CBS”), which is a private non-profit pension fund established in July 1960. The1960 which has as members of CBS are employees—andthe employees (and former employees—employees) of the Company and some subsidiaries thatwho joined the fund through an agreement, and the employees of CBS itself. The Executive Officers of CBS is comprised offormed by a CEO and two other executive officers, all appointed by CSN, which is the main sponsor of CBS. The Decision-Making Board is the higher decision-making and guideline-setting body of CBS, presided over by the president of the pension fund and made up of ten members, six chosen by CSN in its capacity as main sponsor of CBS and four elected by the fund’s participants. Until December 1995, CBS Previdência administered two defined benefit plans based on years of service, salary and Social Security benefits. On December 27, 1995 the then Private Pension Secretariat (“SPC”) approved the implementation of a new benefit plan, effective beginning that date, called Mixed Supplementary Benefit Plan (‘Mixed Plan”), structured in the form of a variable contribution plan. Employees hired after that date werecan only entitled to join the new Mixed Plan. In addition, all active employees who were participants of the oldformer defined benefit plans had the opportunity to switch to the new Mixed Plan. As of December 31, 20122015 CBS had 33,03733,065 participants (31,482(34,426 as of December 31, 2011)204), of whom 18,26218,430 were active contributors (16,603(19,279 as of December 31, 2011)2014), 9,58713,965 were retired employees (9,705(14,379 as of December 31, 2011)2014),and 5,188670 were related beneficiaries (5,174(788 as of December 31, 2011)2014). Out of the total participants as of December 31, 2012,13,7262015, 12,091 belonged to the defined benefit plan,18,150 14,960 to the mixed plan, and1,4811,595 to the CBSPrev Namisa plan,. and 4,419 to the CBSPrev plan. The plan assets of CBS are primarily invested in repurchase agreements (backed by federal government bonds)securities), federal government securities indexed to inflation, shares, loans and real estate. As of December 31, 2012,2015 CBS held 12,788,23120,143,031 common shares of CSN (12,788,231 common shares as of December 31, 2011)2014). The total plan assets of the entity amounted to R$4.3 4.5 billion as of December 31, 20122015 (R$3.84.2 billion as of December 31, 2011)2014). The administrators of the CBS funds seek to match plan assets with benefit obligations payable on a long-term basis. Pension funds in Brazil are subject to certain restrictions regarding their capacity for investment in foreign assets and, therefore, these funds invest mainly in Brazilian securities. Plan Assets are all available assets and the benefit plans’ investments, not including the amounts of debts to sponsors. F-77
For the defined benefit plans 35% of the average salary” and “average salary supplementation plan, the Company holds a financial guarantee with CBS Previdência, the entity that administers said plans, to ensure their financial and actuarial balance, in the event of any future actuarial loss or actuarial gain. As provided for in the prevailing law that governs the pension fund market, for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2015, CSN did not have to pay the installments because the defined benefit plans posted actuarial gains for the period. a.27.a) Description of the pension plans
Plan covering 35% of the average salary This plan began on February 1, 1966 and is a defined benefit plan aimed at paying pensions (for length of service, special situations, disability or old age) on a lifetime basis, equivalent to 35% of the adjusted average of the participant’s salary for the last 12 months. The plan also guarantees sick pay to participants on Official Social Security leaves of absence and further ensures payments of savings fund, funeral allowance and pecuniary aid. This plan was discontinued on October 31, 1977 when the new supplementary plan based on average salary took effect. Supplementary averageAverage salary supplementation plan
This plan began on November 1, 1977 and is a defined benefit plan aimed at complementing the difference between the adjusted average of the participant’s salary for the last 12 months and the Official Social Security benefit for retirement,also on a lifetime basis. As in the 35% plan, there is coverage for the benefits of sick pay, death and pension. This plan was discontinued on December 26, 1995 with the creation of the mixed supplementary benefit plan. FS-69
Mixed supplementary benefit plan This plan began on December 27, 1995 and is a variable contribution plan. Besides the scheduled retirement benefit, it also covers the payment of risk benefits (pension paid while the participant is still working, disability compensation and sick/accident pay). Under this plan, the retirement benefit is calculated based on the amount accumulated by the monthly contributions of the participants and sponsors, as well as on each participant’s option for the manner in which they receive them, which can be lifetime (with or without continuity of pension for death) or through a percentage applied to the balance of the benefit-generating fund generating the benefit (loss for indefinite period). After retirement is granted, the plan takes on the characteristics of a defined benefit plan. This plan was discontinued on October 16, 2013 when the CBS Prev plan became effective. CBSPrev Namisa planCBS Prev Plan
This plan began on January 6, 2012 andThe new CBS Prev Plan, which is a defined contribution plan, with a small portion of defined benefit. Besides the scheduled retirement benefit, it also covers the payment of risk benefits (pension paid while the participant is still working, disability compensation and sick/accident pay).started on September 16, 2013. Under this plan, the retirement benefit is determined based on the accumulated amount by monthly contributions of participants and sponsors. To receive the benefit, each participant can opt for: (a) a percentage of upreceiving part in cash (up to 25% in a bullet payment) and the remaining balance through a monthly income through a percentage applied to the benefit-generating fund, generating the benefit,not being applicable to death pension benefits, or (b) receive only a monthly income through a percentage applied to the fund generating the benefit.benefit-generating fund.
With the creation of the CBS Prev Plan, the mixed supplementary benefit plan was discontinued for the entry of new participants as from September 16, 2013. b.27.b) Investment policy
The investment policy establishes the principles and guidelines that will govern the investments of funds entrusted to the entity, in order to foster the security, liquidity and profitability required to ensure equilibrium between the plan’s assets and liabilities based on an ALM (Asset Liability Management) study that takes into consideration the benefits of participants and beneficiaries for each plan. The investment plan is reviewed annually and approved by the Decision-Making Board considering a 5-yearfive-year horizon, as established by resolution CGPC 7 of December 4, 2003. The investment limits and criteria established in the policy are based on Resolution 3,792/09 published by the National Monetary Council (“CMN”). F-78
c.27.c) Employee benefits
The actuarial calculations are updated at the end of each annual reporting period by outside actuaries and presented in the financial statements pursuant to IAS 19Employee Benefits. Benefits. | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | | | | | | | Consolidated | | Actuarial asset (*) | | Actuarial liability | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Pension plan benefits | 93,546 | | 17,939 | | 11,673 | | | | Actuarial asset | | Actuarial liability | Pension plan benefits (Note 8 and 14) | | 114,443 | | 97,173 | | 25,294 | | 11,275 | Post-employment healthcare benefits | | | 547,652 | | 457,377 | | | | | 489,074 | | 576,480 | | 93,546 | | 565,591 | | 469,050 | 114,443 | | 97,173 | | 514,368 | | 587,755 | | | | | | | |
(*) Beginning2012, the Company decided to recognize in its balance sheet the asset and the balancing items thereto resulting from the actuarial valuation of surplus plans, in accordance with paragraph 59 of IAS 19Employee Benefits.
FS-70
The reconciliation of employee benefits’ assets and liabilities is as follows: | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Present value of defined benefit obligations | 2,666,261 | | 2,153,649 | | Present value of defined benefit obligation | | 2,430,381 | | 2,508,441 | Fair value of plan assets | (2,923,483) | | (2,384,450) | (2,684,736) | | (2,745,834) | (surplus) | (257,222) | | (230,801) | | (Surplus) | | (254,355) | | (237,393) | Restriction to actuarial assets due to recovery limitation | 181,615 | | 174,926 | 165,216 | | 151,495 | (assets), net | (75,607) | | (55,875) | | (Assets), net | | (89,139) | | (85,898) | Liabilities | 17,939 | | 11,673 | 25,294 | | 11,275 | Assets | (93,546) | | (67,548) | (114,433) | | (97,173) | Net (assets)/liabilities recognized in the balance sheet | (75,607) | | 11,673 | | | | | | | Net (assets) recognized in the balance sheet | | (89,139) | | (85,898) |
ChangesThe movement in the present value of the defined benefit obligation during 2012 are2015 is as follows:
| 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Present value of obligations at the beginning of the year | 2,153,649 | | 1,982,556 | 2,508,441 | | 2,263,012 | Cost of services | 5,801 | | 5,579 | | Cost of service | | 1,807 | | 10,114 | Interest cost | 215,850 | | 202,242 | 293,533 | | 255,573 | Benefits paid | (193,563) | | (178,402) | (235,541) | | (209,891) | Actuarial loss | 484,524 | | 141,674 | | Actuarial loss/(gain) | | ( 137,859) | | 189,633 | Present value of obligations at the end of the year | 2,666,261 | | 2,153,649 | 2,430,381 | | 2,508,441 | | | | | | | |
ChangesThe movement in the fair valuesvalue of the plan assets during 2012 are2015 is as follows:
| 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | Fair value of assets at the beginning of the year | (2,384,450) | | (2,316,018) | Expected return on plan assets | (272,406) | | (260,163) | Sponsors' contributions | (3,797) | | (67,709) | Participants' contributions | | | | Benefits paid | 193,563 | | 178,402 | Actuarial (losses)/gains | (456,393) | | 81,038 | Fair value of assets at the end of the year | (2,923,483) | | (2,384,450) | | | | |
| | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Fair value of plan assets at the beginning of the year | (2,745,834) | | (2,684,783) | Expected return on plan assets | (322,460) | | (305,469) | Benefits paid | 235,830 | | 209,891 | Actuarial gains | 147,728 | | 34,527 | Fair value of plan assets at the end of the year | (2,684,736) | | (2,745,834) |
The amounts recognized in the income statement for the year ended December 31, 20122015 are comprised as follows: | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | Cost of current services | 5,801 | | 5,579 | Interest cost | 215,850 | | 202,242 | Expected return on plan assets | (272,406) | | (260,163) | Sponsors' contributions transferred in prior year | (3,797) | | (67,709) | | (54,552) | | (120,051) | Total unrecognized (income) (*) | (37,477) | | (16,374) | Total (income) recognized in the income statement | (17,075) | | (103,677) | Total costs (revenue), net | (54,552) | | (120,051) | | | | |
| 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Cost of current service | 1,807 | | 10,114 | Interest cost | 293,533 | | 255,573 | Expected return on plan assets | (322,460) | | (305,469) | Interest on the asset ceiling effect | 18,422 | | 39,733 | | (8,698) | | (49) | Total unrecognized costs (income) (*) | 4 | | 117 | Total (income) recognized in the income statement | (8,702) | | (166) | Total (income), net (*) | (8,698) | | (49) |
F-79
(*) Effect of the limit of paragraph 58 (b) of IAS 19Employee Benefits. The (cost)/income is recognized in the income statement in other operating expenses. ChangesThe movement in the actuarial gains and losses in 2012 are2015 is as follows:
| 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Actuarial losses and (gains) | 9,869 | | 224,160 | Restriction due to recovery limitation | (4,208) | | (224,099) | | 5,661 | | 61 | Actuarial losses and (gains) recognized in other comprehensive income | 5,665 | | 178 | Unrecognized actuarial (gains) (*) | (4) | | (117) | Total cost of actuarial losses and (gains) | 5,661 | | 61 |
FS-71
| 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | Actuarial losses | 28,131 | | 222,712 | Restriction due to recovery limitation | 6,688 | | (105,655) | | 34,819 | | 117,057 | Actuarial (gains) and losses recognized in other comprehensive income | (2,657) | | 28,048 | Unrecognized actuarial losses (*) | 37,476 | | 89,009 | Total cost of actuarial (gains) and losses | 34,819 | | 117,057 | | | | |
(*) The actuarialActuarial loss results from the fluctuation in the investments that formcomprised in the CBS’s asset portfolio. Breakdown of actuarial gains or losses, required by IAS 19: | 12/31/2014 | Loss due to change in demographic assumptions | (6,298) | Loss due to change in financial assumptions | (250,280) | Loss due to experience adjustments | 118,718 | Return on plan assets (less interest income) | 147,729 | Actuarial losses | 9,869 |
The history of actuarial gains and losses is as follows: | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | | 12/31/2010 | | 12/31/2009 | | 01/01/2009 | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | | 12/31/2013 | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | Present value of defined benefit obligations | 2,666,261 | | 2,153,649 | | 1,982,556 | | 1,731,767 | | (1,415,029) | 2,430,381 | | 2,508,441 | | 2,263,012 | | 2,666,261 | | 2,153,649 | Fair value of plan assets | (2,923,483) | | (2,384,450) | | (2,316,018) | | (2,160,158) | | 1,396,350 | (2,684,736) | | (2,745,834) | | (2,684,783) | | (2,923,483) | | (2,384,450) | (surplus) | (257,222) | | (230,801) | | (333,462) | | (428,391) | | (18,679) | | (Surplus) | | (254,355) | | (237,393) | | (421,771) | | (257,222) | | (230,801) | Experience adjustments to plan obligations | 484,524 | | 141,674 | | 225,341 | | 287,146 | | | (137,859) | | 189,633 | | (439,983) | | 484,524 | | 141,674 | Experience adjustments to plan assets | 456,393 | | (81,038) | | 40,669 | | 664,341 | | | 147,728 | | 34,527 | | (293,159) | | 456,393 | | (81,038) |
F-80
The main actuarial assumptions used were as follows: | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Actuarial financing method | Projected unit credit | | Projected unit credit | Projected unit credit | | Projected unit credit | Functional currency | Real (R$) | | Real (R$) | Real (R$) | | Real (R$) | Recognition of plan assets | Fair value | | Fair value | Fair value | | Fair value | Amount used as estimate of equity at the end of the year | Best estimate for equity at the end of the fiscal year, obtained based on a projection of October amounts recorded | | Best estimate for equity at the end of the fiscal year, obtained based on a projection of October amounts recorded | Best estimate for equity at the end of the fiscal year, obtained based on a projection of the October amounts recorded | | Best estimate for equity at the end of the fiscal year, obtained based on a projection of the October amounts recorded | Nominal discount rate | 9.31% | | 10.46% | 13.43% | | 12.20% | Inflation rate | 5.00% | | 4.60% | 5.70% | | 5.70% | Nominal salary increase rate | 6.05% | | 5.65% | 6.76% | | 6.76% | Nominal benefit increase rate | 5.00% | | 4.60% | 5.70% | | 5.70% | Rate of return on investments (*) | 9.31% | | 11,52% - 12,24% | | Rate of return on investments | | 13.43% | | 12.20% | General mortality table | | Milênio Plan and Healthcare Plan: AT 2000 segregated by gender | | Milênio Plan and Healthcare Plan: AT 2000 segregated by gender | AT 2000 segregated by gender | | AT 2000 segregated by gender | 35% and Average Salary Supplementation Plans: AT 2000 segregated by gender (10% smoothed) | | 35% and Average Salary Supplementation Plans: AT 2000 segregated by gender (10% smoothed) | Disability table | Mercer Disability with probabilities multiplied by 2 | | Mercer Disability with probabilities multiplied by 2 | Light Median | | Mercer Disability with probabilities multiplied by 2 | Disability mortality table | Winklevoss - 1% | | Winklevoss - 1% | Winklevoss - 1% | | Winklevoss - 1% | Turnover table | Millennium plan 3% p.a., nil for DB plans | | Millennium plan 2% p.a., nil for DB plans | Millennium plan 5% p.a., nil for DB plans | | Millennium plan 3% p.a., nil for DB plans | Retirement age | 100% on first date he/shed becomes eligible for programmed retirement benefit under plan | | 100% on first date he/shed becomes eligible for programmed retirement benefit under plan | 100% on the first date he/she becomes eligible for programmed retirement benefit under the plan | | 100% on the first date he/she becomes eligible for programmed retirement benefit under the plan | Household of active participants | 95% will be married at the time of retirement, with the wife being 4 years younger than the husband | | 95% will be married at the time of retirement, with the wife being 4 years younger than the husband | 95% will be married at the time of retirement, with the wife being 4 years younger than the husband | | 95% will be married at the time of retirement, with the wife being 4 years younger than the husband |
The assumptions related to the mortality table are based on published statistics and mortality tables. These tables represent an average life expectancy in years of employees retiringwho retire at the age of 65, as shown below: | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | BD Plan (*) | | Milênio Plan (*) | | BD Plan (*) | | Milênio Plan (*) | Longevity at age of 65 for current participants | | | | | | | | | | | Male | 19.55 | | 19.55 | 20.45 | | 19.55 | | 20.45 | | 19.55 | Female | 22.17 | | 22.17 | 23.02 | | 22.17 | | 23.02 | | 22.17 | | | | | | | | | | Longevity at age of 65 for current participants who are 40 | | | | | | | | | | | Male | 19.55 | | 19.55 | 42.69 | | 41.59 | | 42.69 | | 41.59 | Female | 22.17 | | 22.17 | 46.29 | | 45.30 | | 46.29 | | 45.30 |
FS-72
(*) The BD Plan is part of the 35% and Average Salary Supplementation Plan and the Milênio Plan is part of the Mixed Supplementary Benefit Plan. Allocation of plan assets: | | | 12/31/2012 | | | | 12/31/2011 | | | 12/31/2015 | | | | 12/31/2014 | Variable income | 110,668 | | 3.79% | | 360,958 | | 15.14% | 25,801 | | 0.96% | | 38,167 | | 1.61% | Fixed income | 2,631,187 | | 90.00% | | 1,756,831 | | 73.68% | 2,492,324 | | 92.83% | | 2,538,297 | | 93.59% | Real estate | 118,739 | | 4.06% | | 190,756 | | 8.00% | 124,306 | | 4.63% | | 112,900 | | 3.24% | Other | 62,889 | | 2.15% | | 75,905 | | 3.18% | 42,305 | | 1.58% | | 56,470 | | 1.56% | Total | 2,923,483 | | 100.00% | | 2,384,450 | | 100.00% | 2,684,736 | | 100.00% | | 2,745,834 | | 100.00% | | | | | | | | | |
The actual return on plan assets was R$728,800 as ofDecember 31,2012 (R$179,126 as of December 31,2011).
F-81
Variable-income assets comprise mainly CSN shares. Fixed-income assets comprise mostly debentures, Certificates of Interbank Deposit Certificates (“CDI”) and National Treasury Notes (“NTN-B”). Real estate refers to buildings appraised by a specialized asset appraisal firm. There are no assets in use by CSN and its subsidiaries. For the definedmixed supplementary benefit plans, the expense as of December 31, 2012 was R$5,256 (R$67,276 as of December 31, 2011). For the mixed plan, which has defined contribution components, the expense as of December 31, 20122015 was R$31,657 (R$29,487 29,887 (R$31,053 as of December 31, 2011).2014 ).
For the defined contribution plan CBSPrev Namisa, the expense in 20122015 was R$1,466.1,192 (R$1,637 as of December 31, 2014). d.Expected contributionsFor the defined contribution plan CBSPrev, the expense in 2015 was R$4,460 (R$1,959 as of December 31, 2014).
27.d) Expected contributions of R$3,291 will No contributions are expected to be paid to the defined benefitsbenefit plans in 2013.2016. For the mixed supplementary benefit plan, which includes defined contribution components, expected contributions of R$27,980 will30,498 are forecasted to be paid in 2013.2016. e.27.e) Sensitivity analysis
The quantitative sensitivity analysis regarding the significant assumptions for the pension plans as of December 31, 2015 is as follows: 12/31/2015 | Plan covering 35% of the average salary | | Average salary supplementation plan | | Mixed supplementary benefit plan (Milênio Plan) | Assumption: Discount rate | | | | | | | | | Sensitivity level | 0.5% | -0.5% | | 0.5% | -0.5% | | 0.5% | -0.5% | Effect on current service cost and on interest on actuarial obligations | 55 | (69) | | (188) | 134 | | (945) | 966 | Effect on present value of obligations | (11,786) | 12,640 | | (54,702) | 58,756 | | (28,598) | 31,054 | | | | | | | | | | Assumption: Salary growth | | | | | | | | | Sensitivity level | 0.5% | -0.5% | | 0.5% | -0.5% | | 0.5% | -0.5% | Effect on current service cost and on interest on actuarial obligations | | | | | | | 500 | (425) | Effect on present value of obligations | | | | 2 | (2) | | 2,960 | (2,516) | | | | | | | | | | Assumption: Mortality table | | | | | | | | | Sensitivity level | 0.5% | -0.5% | | 0.5% | -0.5% | | 0.5% | -0.5% | Effect on current service cost and on interest on actuarial obligations | 399 | (373) | | 1,521 | (1,418) | | | | Effect on present value of obligations | 3,109 | (2,908) | | 11,903 | (11,099) | | | | | | | | | | | | | Assumption: Benefit adjustment | | | | | | | | | Sensitivity level | 1.0% | -1.0% | | 1.0% | -1.0% | | 1.0% | -1.0% | Effect on current service cost and on interest on actuarial obligations | (955) | 941 | | (3,849) | 3,752 | | (434) | 432 | Effect on present value of obligations | (7,083) | 6,981 | | (28,686) | 27,964 | | (3,948) | 3,878 |
The forecast benefit payments of the defined benefit plans for future years are as follows:
F-82
Forecast benefit payments | | | 2015 | Year1 | | | 223,969 | Year 2 | | | 240,938 | Year3 | | | 251,011 | Year 4 | | | 261,150 | Year 5 | | | 271,337 | Next 5 years | | | 1,507,452 | Total forecast payments | | | 2,755,857 |
27.f) Post-employment health care plan ReferRefers to a healthcare plan created on December 1, 1996 exclusively for former retired former employees, pensioners, those who received an amnesty, war veterans, widows of employees who died as a result of on-the-job accidents and former employees who retired on or before March 20, 1997 and their related dependents. Since then, the healthcare plan does not allow the inclusion of new beneficiaries. The plan is sponsored by CSN and administered by Caixa Beneficente dos Empregados da Cia. Siderúrgica Nacional –- CBS.
The amounts recognized in the balance sheet were determined as follows: | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Present value of obligations | 547,652 | | 457,377 | 489,074 | | 576,480 | Liabilities | 547,652 | | 457,377 | 489,074 | | 576,480 | | | | | |
FS-73
The reconciliation of liabilities forthe healthcare benefitsbenefit liabilities is as follows: | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | Actuarial liabilities at the beginning of the year | 457,377 | | 367,839 | Interest on actuarial obligation | 45,967 | | 39,616 | Sponsors' contributions transferred in prior year | (32,874) | | (34,653) | Recognition of loss for the year | 77,182 | | 84,575 | Actuarial liabilities at the end of the year | 547,652 | | 457,377 | | | | |
| 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Actuarial liability at the beginning of the year | 576,480 | | 473,966 | Cost of current service | 67,620 | | 53,707 | Sponsor's contributions transferred in prior year | (57,525) | | (46,191) | Recognition of loss/(gain) for the year | (97,501) | | 94,998 | Actuarial liability at the end of the year | 489,074 | | 576,480 |
For the post-employment healthcare benefit plan, the expense as of December 31, 20122015 was R$51,23456,838 (R$42,30654,319 as of December 31, 2011)2014). The actuarial gains and losses recognized in shareholders' equity are as follows: | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | Actuarial loss on obligation | 77,182 | | 84,575 | Loss recognized in shareholders' equity | 77,182 | | 84,575 |
| 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Actuarial gain (loss) on obligation | (97,501) | | 94,998 | Gain (loss) recognized in shareholders' equity | (97,501) | | 94,998 |
The history of actuarial gains and losses is as follows:follows | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | | 12/31/2010 | | 12/31/2009 | | 01/01/2009 | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | | 12/31/2013 | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | Present value of defined benefit obligation | 547,652 | | 457,377 | | 367,839 | | 317,145 | | (296,608) | 489,074 | | 576,480 | | 473,966 | | 547,652 | | 457,377 | Deficit/(surplus) | 547,652 | | 457,377 | | 367,839 | | 317,145 | | (296,608) | | Deficit | | 489,074 | | 576,480 | | 473,966 | | 547,652 | | 457,377 | Experience adjustments to plan obligations | 77,182 | | 84,575 | | 48,301 | | 17,232 | | 9,023 | (97,501) | | 94,998 | | (88,159) | | 77,182 | | 84,575 |
The weighted average life expectancy based on the mortality table used to determined actuarial obligations is as follows: | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Longevity at age of 65 for current participants | | | | Male | 19.55 | | 19.55 | Female | 22.17 | | 22.17 | | | | | Longevity at age of 65 for current participants who are 40 | | | | Male | 41.59 | | 41.59 | Female | 45.30 | | 45.30 |
F-83
The impact on a one-percent change in the assumed trend rate of the healthcare cost is as follows:
| 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | | Increase | | Decrease | | Increase | | Decrease | Effect on total cost of current service and finance cost | | | | | | | | Effect on defined benefit obligation | 54,292 | | (46,668) | | 42,032 | | (35,916) |
The actuarial assumptions used for calculating postemployment healthcare benefits were: | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Biometrics | | | | | | | General mortality table | AT 2000 segregated by gender | | AT 2000 segregated by gender | AT 2000 segregated by gender | | AT 2000 segregated by gender | Turnover | n/a | | n/a | N/A | | n/a | Household | Actual household | | Actual household | Actual household | | Actual household | | | | | | | | | | | | | Financial | 12/31/2011 | | 12/31/2011 | | | | Actuarial nominal discount rate | 9.31% | | 10.46% | 13.43% | | 12.20% | Inflation | 5.00% | | 4.60% | 5.70% | | 5.70% | Nominal increase in medical cost based on age | 5,53% - 8,15% | | 9.41% | 6,23% - 8,87% | | 6.23% - 8.87% | Nominal medical costs growth rate | 8.15% | | 7.02% | 8.87% | | 8.87% | Average medical cost | 345.61 | | 299.69 | 515.37 | | 417.12 |
27.g) Sensitivity analysis The quantitative sensitivity analysis regarding the significant assumptions for the postemployment healthcare plans as of December 31, 2015 is as follows: | | | 12/31/2015 | | | Healthcare Plan | | | Assumption: Discount rate | Sensitivity level | | 0.5% | -0.5% | Effect on current service cost and on interest on actuarial obligations | 119 | (159) | Effect on present value of obligations | | (16,615) | 17,905 | | | | | | | Assumption: Medical Inflation | Sensitivity level | | 1.0% | -1.0% | Effect on current service cost and on interest on actuarial obligations | | 5,449 | (4,750) | Effect on present value of obligations | | 40,673 | (35,471) | | | | | | | Assumption: Mortality table | Sensitivity level | | 1.0% | -1.0% | Effect on current service cost and on interest on actuarial obligations | | (3,084) | 3,184 | Effect on present value of obligations | | (22,967) | 23,708 |
The forecast benefit payments of the postemployment healthcare plans for future years are as follows: Forecast benefit payments | | 2015 | Year 1 | | 49,755 | Year 2 | | 51,975 | Year 3 | | 54,141 | Year 4 | | 56,219 | Year 5 | | 58,180 | Next 5 years | | 314,470 |
Total forecast payments | | 584,740 |
FS-74F-84
29.28. GUARANTEES
The Company is liable for guarantees forof its subsidiaries and jointly controlled entities,joint ventures as follows:follows: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Currency | | Maturities | | Borrowings | | Tax foreclosure | | Other | | Total | | Currency | | Maturities | | Loans | | Tax foreclosure | | Other | | Total | | | | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | | | | | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | | Transnordestina | R$ | | Up to 5/8/2028 and indefinite | | 1,626,509 | | 1,358,657 | | 1,800 | | 1,800 | | 4,866 | | 7,686 | | 1,633,175 | | 1,368,143 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CSN Cimentos | R$ | | Up to 11/18/2014 and indefinite | | | | | | 25,403 | | 30,213 | | 42,397 | | 30,097 | | 67,800 | | 60,310 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Prada | R$ | | Up to 2/7/2014 and indefinite | | | | | | 10,133 | | 9,958 | | 21,616 | | 2,440 | | 31,749 | | 12,398 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Sepetiba Tecon | R$ | | | | | | 700 | | | | | | | | | | | | 700 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Itá Energética | R$ | | 9/15/2013 | | 7,326 | | 7,326 | | | | | | | | | | 7,326 | | 7,326 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Transnordestina Logísitca | | R$ | | Up to 19/09/2056 and indefinite | | 2,544,600 | | 2,451,682 | | 39,559 | | 38,766 | | 5,991 | | 5,975 | | 2,590,150 | | 2,496,423 | FTL - Ferrovia Transnordestina | | R$ | | 15/11/2020 | | 81,700 | | 140,550 | | | | | | 450 | | 142 | | 82,150 | | 140,692 | CSN Cimentos (*) | | | | | | | | | | | | 26,423 | | | | 39,776 | | | | 66,199 | Cia Metalurgica Prada | | R$ | | Minute 10/02/2016 and indefinite | | | | | | 333 | | 10,133 | | 19,340 | | 19,340 | | 19,673 | | 29,473 | CSN Energia | R$ | | Up to 12/30/2012 and indefinite | | | | | | 4,192 | | 2,392 | | | | 2,336 | | 4,192 | | 4,728 | R$ | | Indefinite | | | | | | 2,829 | | 2,829 | | | | | | 2,829 | | 2,829 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Congonhas Minérios | R$ | | 5/21/2018 | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 | | | | | | | | | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 | R$ | | 9/22/2022 | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 | | | | | | | | | | 2,000,000 | | 2,000,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Fundação CSN | R$ | | Indefinite | | 1,003 | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,003 | | | R$ | | Indefinite | | 1,003 | | 1,003 | | | | | | | | | | 1,003 | | 1,003 | Estanho de Rondônia | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 106 | | | | 106 | Outros (**) | | R$ | | 1/1/2016 | | 12,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | 12,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Total in R$ | | | | | 3,634,838 | | 3,366,683 | | 41,528 | | 44,363 | | 68,879 | | 42,559 | | 3,745,245 | | 3,453,605 | | | | | 4,639,303 | | 4,593,235 | | 42,721 | | 78,151 | | 25,781 | | 65,339 | | 4,707,805 | | 4,736,725 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CSN Islands VIII | US$ | | 12/16/2013 | | 550,000 | | 550,000 | | | | | | | | | | 550,000 | | 550,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CSN Islands IX | US$ | | 1/15/2015 | | 400,000 | | 400,000 | | | | | | | | | | 400,000 | | 400,000 | | | | | | | 400,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | 400,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CSN Islands XI | US$ | | 9/21/2019 | | 750,000 | | 750,000 | | | | | | | | | | 750,000 | | 750,000 | US$ | | 9/21/2019 | | 750,000 | | 750,000 | | | | | | | | | | 750,000 | | 750,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CSN Islands XII | US$ | | Perpetual | | 1,000,000 | | 1,000,000 | | | | | | | | | | 1,000,000 | | 1,000,000 | US$ | | Perpetual | | 1,000,000 | | 1,000,000 | | | | | | | | | | 1,000,000 | | 1,000,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CSN Resources | US$ | | 7/21/2020 | | 1,200,000 | | 1,000,000 | | | | | | | | | | 1,200,000 | | 1,000,000 | US$ | | 7/21/2020 | | 1,200,000 | | 1,200,000 | | | | | | | | | | 1,200,000 | | 1,200,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CSN Handel | | | | | | | | 100,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | 100,000 | Total in US$ | | | | | 3,900,000 | | 3,700,000 | | | | | | | | | | 3,900,000 | | 3,700,000 | | | | | 2,950,000 | | 3,450,000 | | | | | | | | | | 2,950,000 | | 3,450,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CSN Steel S.L. | EUR | | 1/31/2020 | | 120,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | 120,000 | | | EUR | | 1/31/2020 | | 120,000 | | 120,000 | | | | | | | | | | 120,000 | | 120,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Lusosider Aços Planos | | EUR | | Perpetual | | 25,000 | | 25,000 | | | | | | | | | | 25,000 | | 25,000 | Total in EUR | | | | | 120,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | 120,000 | | | | | | | 145,000 | | 145,000 | | | | | | | | | | 145,000 | | 145,000 | Total in R$ | | | | | 8,218,991 | | 6,940,460 | | | | | | | | | | 8,218,991 | | 6,940,460 | | | | | 12,135,468 | | 9,631,805 | | | | | | | | | | 12,135,468 | | 9,631,805 | | | | | | 11,853,829 | | 10,307,143 | | 41,528 | | 44,363 | | 68,879 | | 42,559 | | 11,964,236 | | 10,394,065 | | | | | 16,774,771 | | 14,225,040 | | 42,721 | | 78,151 | | 25,781 | | 65,339 | | 16,843,273 | | 14,368,530 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(*) Company incorporated in May 2015. (**) Guarantees for the subsidiaries Companhia Metalurgica Prada, Cia Metalic Nordeste, Sepetiba Tecon, Nacional Minérios, CSN Energia and Ersa.
FS-75F-85
30.29. COMMITMENTS
a.Take-or-pay contracts
29.a) Take-or-pay contracts As of December 31, 20122015 and2011, 2014, the Company was a party to take-or-pay contracts as shown in the following table: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Payments in the period | | | | | | | | | | | Counterparty | Type of service | | Agreement terms and conditions | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | After 2015 | | Total | MRS Logística | Iron ore transportation. | | Contractual clause providing for guaranteed revenue on railway freight. In the case of CSN, this means a minimum payment of 80% of freight estimate. | | 153,870 | | 142,190 | | 131,271 | | 131,271 | | 131,271 | | 65,635 | | 459,448 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | MRS Logística | Steel products transportation. | | Transportation of at least 80% of annual volume agreed with MRS. | | 17,606 | | 68,248 | | 58,762 | | 58,762 | | 58,762 | | 24,484 | | 200,770 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (*) MRS Logística | Iron ore, coke and coal transportation. | | Transportation of 8,280,000 metric tons per year of iron ore and 3,600,000 metric tons per year of coal, coke and other reducing agents. | | 41,463 | | 23,334 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | FCA | Mining products transportation. | | Transportation of at least 1,900,000 metric tons per year. | | 1,324 | | 734 | | 69,817 | | | | | | | | 69,817 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | FCA | FCA railway transportation of clinker to CSN Cimentos. | | Transportation of at least 675,000 metric tons per year of clinker in 2011 and 738,000 metric tons per year of clinker starting 2012.
| | 1,648 | | 2,733 | | 27,300 | | 27,300 | | 27,300 | | 118,301 | | 200,201 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (*) ALL | Railway transportation of steel products. | | Rail transportation of at least, 20,000 metric tons of steel products monthly, which can vary 10% up or down, originated at the Água Branca Terminal in São Paulo for CSN PR in Araucária, State of Paraná. | | 14,774 | | 11,894 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | White Martins | Supply of gas (oxygen, nitrogen and argon). | | CSN undertakers to buy at least 90% of the annual volume of gas contracted with White Martins. | | 102,274 | | 110,999 | | 110,113 | | 110,113 | | 110,113 | | 110,113 | | 440,452 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | (*) CEG Rio | Supply of natural gas. | | CSN undertakes to buy at least 70% of the monthly natural gas volume. | | 432,449 | | 441,804 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Vale S.A | Supply of iron ore pellets. | | CSN undertakes to buy at least 90% of the volume of iron ore pellets secured by contract.The take-or-pay volume is determined every 18 months. | | 349,797 | | 444,642 | | 132,302 | | 88,201 | | | | | | 220,503 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Compagás | Supply of natural gas. | | CSN undertakes to buy at least 80% of the monthly natural gas volume contracted with Compagás. | | 16,884 | | 18,874 | | 15,058 | | 15,058 | | 15,058 | | 135,522 | | 180,696 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | COPEL | Power supply. | | CSN undertakers to buy at least 80% of the annual energy volume contracted with COPEL. | | 13,378 | | 15,202 | | 7,487 | | 7,487 | | 7,487 | | 39,934 | | 62,395 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | K&K Tecnologia | Processing of blast furnace sludge generated during pig iron production. | | CSN undertakes to supply at least 3,000 metric tons per month of blast furnace sludge for processing at K&K sludge concentration plant. | | 6,186 | | 7,585 | | 7,074 | | 7,074 | | 7,074 | | 51,285 | | 72,507 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Harsco Metals | Processing of slag generated during pig iron and steel production. | | Harsco Metals undertakes to process metal products and slag crushing byproducts resulting from CSN’s pig iron and steel manufacturing process, receiving for this processing the amount corresponding to the product of the multiplication of unit price (R$/t) by total production of liquid steel from CSN steel mill, ensuring a minimum production of liquid steel of 400,000 metric tons. | | 39,739 | | 40,506 | | 30,000 | | 15,000 | | | | | | 45,000 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Siemens | Manufacturing, repair, recovery and production of ingot casting machine units. | | Siemens undertakes to manufacture, repair, recover and produce, in whole or in part, ingot casting machine units to provide the necessary off-line and on-line maintenance of continuous ingot casting machine assemblies of the Presidente Vargas plant (UPV). Payment is set at R$/t of produced steel plates. | | 38,817 | | 46,424 | | 19,622 | | | | | | | | 19,622 | (*) in renegotiation phase. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1,230,209 | | 1,375,169 | | 608,806 | | 460,266 | | 357,065 | | 545,274 | | 1,971,411 |
| | Payments in the period (in millions of R$) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Type of service | | 2014 | | 2015 | | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | After 2019 | | Total | Transportation of iron ore, coal, coke, steel products, cement and mining products. | | 263,266 | | 197,646 | | | 624,459 | | 595,951 | | 595,951 | | 595,951 | | 3,916,115 | | 6,328,427 | Unloading, storage, movement, loading and railroad transportation services. | | 5,570 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Supply of power, natural gas, oxygen, nitrogen, argon and iron ore pellets. | | 1,011,416 | | 1,023,465 | | | 342,817 | | 32,205 | | 32,205 | | 32,205 | | 64,409 | | 503,841 | Processing of slag generated during pig iron and steel production | | 49,739 | | 104,013 | | | 18,743 | | 8,507 | | 8,507 | | 7,074 | | 22,988 | | 65,819 | Manufacturing, repair, recovery and production of ingot casting machine units. | | 40,250 | | 127,776 | | | 2,885 | | | | | | | | | | 2,885 | | | 1,370,241 | | 1,452,900 | | | 988,904 | | 636,663 | | 636,663 | | 635,230 | | 4,003,512 | | 6,900,972 |
b.29.b) Concession agreements
Minimum future payments related to government concessions as of December 31, 20122015 fall due according to the schedule set out in the following table: Company | | | | | | Concession | | Type of service | | 2013 | | 2014 | | 2015 | | After 2015 | | Total | | Type of service | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | After 2019 | | Total | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | MRS | | 30-year concession, renewable for another 30 years, to provide iron ore railway transportation services from the Casa de Pedra mines, in Minas Gerais, coke and coal from the Itaguaí Port, in Rio de Janeiro, to Volta Redonda, transportation of export goods to the Itaguaí and Rio de Janeiro Ports, and shipping of finished goods to the domestic market. | | 86,322 | | 86,322 | | 86,322 | | 884,804 | | 1,143,770 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Transnordestina | | 30-year concession granted on December 31, 1997, renewable for another 30 years for the development of public utility to operate the Northeastern railway system. This railway system covers 4,238 kilometers of railroads in the states of Maranhão, Piauí, Ceará, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Alagoas and Rio Grande do Norte. | | 7,011 | | 7,011 | | 7,011 | | 80,039 | | 101,072 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | FTL (Ferrovia Transnordestina Logística) | | | 30-year concession granted on December 31, 1997, renewable for another 30 years, to develop public service and operating the railway system in northeastern Brazil. The northeastern railway system covers 4238 kilometers of railway network and operates in Maranhão, Piauí, Ceará, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Alagoas and Rio Grande do Norte. | | 8,229 | | 8,229 | | 8,229 | | 8,229 | | 65,832 | | 98,748 | Tecar | | Concession to operate TECAR, a solid bulk terminal, one of the four terminals that comprise the Itaguaí Port, in Rio de Janeiro, for a period ending 2022 and renewable for another 25 years. | | 117,913 | | 125,922 | | 125,922 | | 881,455 | | 1,251,212 | | Concession to operate the TECAR, a solid bulk terminal, one of the four terminals that make up the Port of Itaguai, located in Rio de Janeiro. The concession agreement expires in 2022, renewable for another 25 years. | | 125,326 | | 125,326 | | 125,326 | | 125,326 | | 3,509,116 | | 4,010,420 | | | �� | | | | | | | | | | | | Tecon | | 25-year concession granted in July 2001, renewable for another 25 years, to operate the container terminal at the Itaguaí Port. | | 23,838 | | 23,838 | | 23,838 | | 238,384 | | 309,898 | | 25-year concession started in July 2001, renewable for another 25 years to operate the container terminal at the Port of Itaguai. | | 27,927 | | 27,927 | | 27,927 | | 27,927 | | 181,523 | | 293,231 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 161,482 | | 161,482 | | 161,482 | | 161,482 | | 3,756,471 | | 4,402,399 | | | | | 235,084 | | 243,093 | | 243,093 | | 2,084,682 | | 2,805,952 | |
FS-76F-86
c.29.c) Projects and other commitments
·Steel – Flat and long steel
CSN intends to produce 500,000 metric tons per year of long steel products, with an estimate of 400,000 t/year of rebar and 100,000 t/year of wire rod. The facilities will use scrap and pig iron as their main raw materials. In addition to this plant, CSN is assessing the option of implementing in Brazil other similar projects, also with 500,000 t/year capacity each.
· Iron ore project
CSN projects producing 89 mtpa of iron ore products, including 50 mtpa at Casa de Pedra and 39 mtpa at Namisa. In addition, a CSN is inventing in the expansion of the Itaguaí seaport, or TECAR, for a capacity of 84 mtpa.
Coal and coke imports are made using the TECAR terminal, whose concession agreement is 25 years, extendable for another 25 years.
Upon concession termination, all rights and privileges transferred to Tecon will be handed back to CDRJ (Companhia Docas do Rio de Janeiro), together with the assets owned by CSN and those resulting from investments made by CSN in leased assets, declared as returnable assets by CDRJ as they are necessary to the continuity of the related services. Any assets declared as returnable assets will be compensated by CDRJ at their residual value, less related depreciation/amortization.
·Nova Transnordestina project
The Nova Transnordestina project includes building 1,7281,753 km inof new, next-generation, wide-gauge tracks. The project posts a 55% progress and completion is estimated for 2017 (completion period currently under review and discussion with the responsible agencies). The Company expects that the investments will permit Transnordestina Logística S.A. to boost the transportationtransport of several products, such as iron ore, limestone, soy, cotton, sugarcane, fertilizers, oil, and fuel. The investments are being financed by meansconcessionaire of several agencies, such as the Northeast Investment Fund (FINOR),Transnordestina project holds the Northeast Development Authority (SUDENE)concession through no longer than 2057, and can be terminated before this date if the BNDES.minimum return agreed with the Government is reached. Transnordestina has already obtained the required environmental permits, purchased part of the equipment, contracted some of the services, and in certain regions the project is at an advanced implementation stage. The Company is the guarantorsources of BNDES loansfinancing for the Transnordestina project whichare: (i) financing granted by Banco do Nordeste/ FNE and the BNDES, (ii) debentures issued by FDNE, (iii) Permanent Track Use contracts, and (iv) interest in the capital of CSN and public shareholders. The approved construction investment is R$7,542,000 and the balance of disbursable funds will be adjusted using the IPCA as of December 31,2012total R$410,675 (R$392,874 as of December 31, 2011). These loans are being used to finance the investments in Transnordestina’s infrastructure. The maximum amount of future payments that canfrom April 2012. Should additional funds be required, from the guarantorthey will be provided by CSN and/or third parties under the guarantee is R$410,675. Permanent Track Use contracts. ·CSN’s Logistic Platform Project in ItaguaíThe budget to conclude the project is under review, currently it is being analyzed by the competent agencies (shareholders), and it is expected that the reviewed budget will be as follows: Missão Velha-Salgueiro: R$0.4 billion, Salgueiro-Trindade: R$0.7 billion, Trindade-Eliseu Martins: R$2.4 billion, Missão Velha-Porto de Pecém: R$3 billion, Salgueiro-Porto de Suape: R$4.7 billion, amounting R$ 11.2 billion.
Under the terms of the concession agreement, CSN is responsible for unloading at least 3.0 million per year of coal and coke from CSN’s suppliers through the terminal, as well as handling ore shipments. Among the approved investments announced by CSN, we highlight the development and expansion of the solid bulk terminal at Itaguaí so that it can also handle up to 84 million metric tons of iron ore per year.
·Long-term agreements with Namisa
The Company has signed long-term agreements with Namisa forguarantees 100% of TLSA’s financing granted by Banco do Nordeste/FNE and the provisionBNDES, and 50.97% of port operation servicesthe debentures issued by FDNE (includes the corporate guarantee of 48.47%, a collateral letter of 1.25% issued to BNB and suppliesthe corporate guarantee of run-of-mine (ROM) iron ore from1.25% pledged to BNB). Under the Casa de Pedra mine, as described below: i. Port operation service agreement
On December 30, 2008, CSNFDNE charter, approved by Federal Decree 6,952/2009, and the Investment Agreement entered into an agreement forwith the provision of port services to Namisa for a 34-year period, consisting of receiving, handling, storing and shipping Namisa’s iron ore in annual volumes that range from 18.0 to 39.0 million metric tons. CSN has received the amount of approximately R$5.3 billion as an advance for part of thepayments due for the services to be provided under this agreement. The amounts charged for these port services are reviewed on a quarterly basis and adjusted considering the changes in the market price for iron ore.
FS-77
ii. High silicon ROM
On December 30, 2008, CSN also entered into an agreement for the supply of high silicon ROM ore to Namisa for a period of 30 years in volumes that range from 42 to 54 million metric tons per year. CSN has received approximately R$1.6 billion as an advance for partpublic shareholders/ financiers, 50% of the payments due for the supplies made under this agreement. The supply price is reviewed on a quarterly basis and adjusted considering the changes in the market price for iron ore.debentures should be converted into TLSA shares.
iii. Low silicon ROM
On December 30, 2008, CSN entered into an agreement for the supply of low silicon ROM ore to Namisa for a period of 35 years in volumes that range from 2.8 to 5.04 million metric tons per year. CSN has received approximately R$424 billion as an advance for part of the payments due for the supplies made under this agreement. The supply price is reviewed on a quarterly basis and adjusted considering the changes in the market price for iron ore.
31.30. INSURANCE
Aiming to properly mitigate risk and in view of the nature of its operations, the Company and its subsidiaries have taken out several different types of insurance policies. Such policies are contracted in line with the CSN Risk Management policy and are similar to the insurance taken out by other companies operating in the same lines of business as CSN and its subsidiaries. The risks covered under such policies include the following: Domestic Transportation, International Transportation, Carrier’s Civil Liability, Life and Casualty, Health Coverage, Fleet Vehicles, D&O (Civil Liability Insurance for Directors and Officers), General Civil Liability, Engineering Risks, Sundrynaming Risks, Export Credit, Performance Bond and Port Operator’s Civil Liability. In 2012,2015, after negotiation with insurers and reinsurers in Brazil and abroad, an Insurance Issue Certificateinsurance policy was issued for the contracting of a policy of Operational Risk of Property Damages and Loss of Profits, with effect from JuneSeptember 30, 20122015 to JuneSeptember 30, 2013.2016. Under the insurance policy, the LMI (Maximum Limit of Indemnity) is US$500,000,000600,000,000 and covers the following units and subsidiaries of the Company: Usina Presidente Vargas, Mineração Casa de Pedra, Mineração Arcos,Congonhas Minérios, CSN Paraná, CSN Porto Real, Terminal de Cargas Tecar, Terminal Tecon,Handel and Namisa and CSN Cimentos. Handel. CSN takes responsibility for a range of retention of US$300,000,000375 million in excess of the deductibles for property damages and loss of profits. In view of their nature, the risk assumptions adopted are not part of the scope of an audit of the financial statements and, accordingly, were not examinedaudited by our independent auditors. F-87
32.31. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CASH FLOWS
In 2015, the Company incorporated the subsidiary CSN Cement and realized the drop down of Casa the Pedra, Tecar, investment in Namisa and MRS assets. Part of the net assets, shown in note 9, is not included in the statement of cash flows. In addition, the following table provides additional information on transactions related to the statement of cash flows: | 12/31/2012 | | 12/31/2011 | | Deferred income tax and social contribution paid | 165,304 | | 165,321 | | Addition to PP&E with interest capitalization | 409,498 | | 353,156 | | | 574,802 | | 518,477 | | | Consolidated | | | | | 12/31/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Income tax and social contribution paid | | 134,920 | | 98,040 | Addition to PP&E with interest capitalization | | 166,366 | | 165,789 | Acquisition of fixed assets without adding cash | | 566,413 | | | Subsidiary capitalization from granted loan | | 3,229 | | | | | 870,928 | | 263,829 |
33.32. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
• Usiminas As of March 2016, the Usiminas’ Board of Directors approved a capital increase amounting to R$64,882, through the issuance of 50,689,310 preferred shares. Consequently on April 22, 2016 CSN exercised its right of subscription, paying R$11,603 by 9,064,856 preferred shares. The Usiminas’ Board of Directors approved in April 2016 an increase in its share capital amounting to R$1,000,000, through the issuance of 200,000,000 new common shares, with a deadline for exercising the preferential right to acquire the said shares up to 23 May 2016. The company continues to evaluate alternatives related to the investment in Usiminas, including additional purchases of shares. On April 28, 2016, CSN elected, for two years term of office, two fixed and two alternate members in the Usiminas’ Board of Directors and, for one year term, one fixed and one alternate member in the Usiminas’ Fiscal Committee. The election was made possible through the flexibility and exceptional decision from CADE (Administrative Council for Economic Defense) in relation to the TCD (Performance Commitment Agreement) signed by CSN and the said Council in 2014. The mentioned decision´s flexibility was approved by the majority of CADE's Board at the meeting on 27 April 2016. • Conduct Adjustment Agreement On April 12, 2016 CSN entered into a Conduct Adjustment Agreement with the Environment Department of the State of Rio de Janeiro, the Environment Control Commission of the State of Rio de Janeiro and the Environment Institute of the State of Rio de Janeiro (INEA) comprising the resolution of all pending environmental issues related to the Presidente Vargas Steelworks (UPV), thereby ensuring the continuation of its operations. By September 2017, CSN will invest R$178 million in production process improvements, which are not accrued in this consolidated interim financial information, and will pay R$22 million to INEA to be used in environmental programs in Volta Redonda region. These related compensations of R$22 million were substantially recorded as provision for contingencies as of March 31, 2016.
Nacional Minérios S.A. Financial Statements For the Eleven Month-Period Ended November 30, 2015 and Independent Auditor’s Report Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Auditores Independentes |
© 2015 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. All rights reserved.
Nacional Minérios s.a. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE ELEVEN MONTH-PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2015 AND YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014 (In thousands of Brazilian Reais - R$, unless otherwise stated) 1.GENERAL INFORMATION Nacional Minérios S.A. (“Company” or “Namisa”) is a private corporation, incorporated in November 2006 and domiciled in Brazil, with its registered head office located in Congonhas, State of Minas Gerais. The Company and its subsidiaries included in the consolidated financial statements carries out their mining operations in the Ferriferous Quadrilateral, in the State of Minas Gerais, where they have ore mining rights and iron ore processing facilities. The Company also has an integrated logistics network, by means of long-term contracts with MRS and Congonhas, consisting on a railroad and port facilities, respectively, used to ship its production. This integrated logistics network allows transporting the iron ore produced in Congonhas, Ouro Preto, Itabirito, Rio Acima, and Nova Lima, in the State of Minas Gerais, to Itaguaí, in the State of Rio de Janeiro. Own iron ore, added to the iron ore purchased from third parties, was substantially sold in the international market, mostly in Europe and Asia. The prices charged in these markets are historically cyclical and subject to significant fluctuations over short periods of time, as a result of several factors related to worldwide demand, strategies adopted by the main steel producers and the foreign exchange rate. All these factors are beyond the Company’s control. Change of control and liquidation of Namisa The Company was jointly controlled until November 30, 2015 under a Shareholders’ Agreement entered into Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional (“CSN”), which holds 60% of Namisa shares, and an Asian Consortium formed by the companies ITOCHU Corporation, JFE Steel Corporation, POSCO, Kobe Steel Ltd., Nisshin Steel Co. Ltd. and China Steel Corp, which jointly hold 40% of the Company’s shares. On December 11, 2014, the CSN Board of Directors approved the establishment of a strategic alliance with the Asian Consortium (“Transaction”). The Transaction consisted of a business combination whereby the Asian Consortium negotiated its equity interest of the Company (40%) to participate in Company Congonhas Minérios S.A. (“Congonhas”), a mining subsidiary of CSN. The Transaction was concluded through the signing of an Investment Agreement, a new Congonhas Shareholders Agreement and a new Namisa Shareholders Agreement on November 30, 2015. As from this date, Namisa became fully controlled by Congonhas. Although certain corporate steps and financial settlements were concluded on December 31, 2015, all the risks and rewards related to Namisa’s equity instruments were transferred to Congonhas on November 30, 2015. Based on Investment Agreement, CSN and Asian Consortium agreed to transfer the assets related of mining rights of Fernandinho, Cayman and Pedras Pretas to Mineração Nacional S.A., a company controlled by CSN. The total amount of net assets transferred to CSN in the FS-1
transaction is described in the note 25. The transaction was conclude through a capital reduction made on November 30, 2015. The parties also agreed that Namisa Handel GmbH, an indirect subsidiary of the Company, acquires CSN Handel GmbH, a foreign subsidiary company controlled by CSN. Both steps of the transaction was concluded on November 30, 2015 and was reflected in these financial statements. Detailed information is provided in the note 3.1. As result of the conclusion of the transaction between CSN and Asian Consortium, on December 31, 2015, the Company was incorporated by Congonhas. Since January 1st, 2016, the operations of Namisa’s assets was carried out by Congonhas. As a result of the transaction, these financial statements are being prepared to be included at the 20-F filing of CSN and are presented for the period through the date that CSN had an equity interest in Namisa. 2.BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). The financial statements have been prepared based on the historical cost basis, except for certain financial instruments that are measured at fair values, as explained in the accounting policies below. Historical cost is generally based on the fair value of the consideration given in exchange for assets. The basis of presentation also considers that the company will be incorporate by Congonhas on December 31, 2015, and Congonhas will assume its rights and obligations. The significant accounting policies adopted in the preparation of the financial statements are as follows: a)Foreign currency translation (i)Functional and presentation currency The consolidated financial statements have been prepared and are presented in Brazilian Reais (R$), which is Company’s functional currency. (ii)Transactions and balances Foreign currency-denominated transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transaction or the dates of valuation when such items are measured. Exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and the translation at the foreign exchange rates at yearend, related to foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities, are recognized in the income statement line item ‘Foreign exchange gains (losses), net’. b)Use of estimates and judgments Critical accounting estimates and assumptions are those deemed important to describe and record the Company’s financial position and require analysis and decision-making power, and more complex and subjective estimates and assumptions by Management. Theapplication of these critical accounting policies frequently requires Management analysis and decision-making about the impacts of matters inherently uncertain with regard to the results from operations and the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates. FS-2
The estimates and assumptions that present a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next fiscal year are disclosed in the notes to the financial statements and correspond to goodwill impairment testing, revenue recognition, review of useful lives and impairment of property, plant, and equipment, contingent assets and liabilities, legal obligations and obligations related to retirement and restoration of assets. c)Cash and cash equivalents Include cash, bank deposit accounts and short-term investments, which consist of highly liquid temporary investments, stated at cost plus income earned through the end of the reporting period, with an insignificant risk of change in fair value or realizable value. d)Trade receivables Refer to amounts receivable from customers for the sale of iron ore in the normal course of the Company’s business. If the collection period is equivalent to one year or less, trade receivables are classified in current assets. Otherwise, they are recorded in noncurrent assets. Trade receivables comprise invoices issued (quantities, humidity indexes and preliminary quality grades), valued based on the commodity price established by Platts, at the shipment date, according to the agreement with each customer. Every month, when applicable, outstanding balances are marked to market based on the future quotation price of the commodities that would be used for the final settlement, when issuing the final invoices. The final invoices, which finalize the export transactions and are generally issued after receiving and analyzing the commodities (approval of quantities, humidity indexes and metal grades by the customers) are valued as established in each contract. The result of the adjustments required, both for issuing the final invoices and for marking to market, is recognized as proceeds from sale when occurred. Based on the history of realization of receivables, Management does not consider necessary to recognize a provision for losses. e)Inventories Stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Iron ore is recognized from the time it is physically extracted at the mine. The Company uses the absorption costing method. Direct costs are allocated based on objective recording and indirect costs are allocated by apportionment, based on normal production capacity, and include costs incurred on purchase of inventories, production and processing costs, and other costs incurred to bring inventories to their current locations and conditions. FS-3
f)Advances to suppliers Consist of long-term advances to CSN for purchases of raw materials and port services. The advances were initially recognized at fair value and are measured at amortized cost, they included contractually agreed interest until December 12, 2014 (see note 8.c)). The advances are realized when: (i) the raw materials are delivered and port services are provided; and (ii) 34% of the interest calculated monthly is received in cash. The portion not expected to be realized within 12 months is classified as noncurrent assets. g)Property, plant and equipment Property, plant and equipment are carried at historical cost, consisting of the acquisition, production or construction cost, less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses, if any. The elements of cost of a property, plant and equipment item comprise: (i) its purchase price, including import duties and non-refundable purchase taxes, after deducting trade discounts and rebates; (ii) any costs directly attributable to bringing the asset to the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by Management; and (iii) the initial estimate of dismantling costs and removing the item and restoring the site on which it is located. These costs represent the obligation incurred by the Company when the item is acquired. Gains and losses on the disposal of a property, plant and equipment item are calculated by comparing the disposal proceeds with the carrying amount of the property, plant and equipment item, and are recognized as other expenses, net, in the income statement. Depreciation is recognized using the straight-line method, based on the estimated useful lives of each part of an item of property, plant and equipment, and ore deposits depletion is calculated based on the ore volume extracted as compared to the mineable reserve, as this is the method that most closely reflects the expected pattern of consumption of the future economic benefits embodied in the asset. Land is not depreciated. The depreciation methods, useful lives and residual values are reviewed at the end of each reporting period, and any adjustments are recognized as changes in accounting estimates. Exploration expenditures are recognized as expenses until the feasibility of mining activities is established; after this period, subsequent development costs are capitalized. Exploration and valuation expenditures include: ·Research and analysis of exploration area historical data; ·Topographic, geological, geochemical and geophysical studies; ·Determine the mineral asset’s volume and quality; ·Examine and test the extraction processes and methods; ·Topographic surveys of the transportation and infrastructure needs; ·Market studies and financial studies. FS-4
The costs for the development of new mineral deposits or capacity expansion in mines in operation are capitalized and amortized using the produced (extracted) units method based on the probable and proven ore quantities.h)Non-current assets held for sale Non-current assets and disposal groups are classified as held for sale if their carrying amount will be recovered principally through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use. This condition is regarded as met only when the asset (or disposal group) is available for immediate sale in its present condition subject only to terms that are usual and customary for sales of such asset (or disposal group) and its sale is highly probable. Management must be committed to the sale, which should be expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year from the date of classification. Noncurrent assets (and disposal groups) classified as held for sale are measured at the lower of their carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell. i)Intangible assets Refer basically to goodwill arising on the acquisition of subsidiary already merged, as detailed in note 12, recognized as the positive difference between the price paid and the net fair value of the acquirer’s assets and liabilities. Goodwill has an indefinite useful life, is not subject to amortization, and is tested for impairment at least annually. Impairment losses, if any, are not reversed in subsequent periods. The Company has a single Cash-Generating Unit (CGU), dedicated exclusively to iron ore processing, to which goodwill was allocated for impairment test purposes. j)Impairment of nonfinancial assets The Company reviews annually, or in a shorter period when there is evidence of impairment, the carrying amount of nonfinancial assets subject to amortization to assess events or changes in economic, operating or technological circumstances that might indicate an impairment of assets. Whenever such evidences are identified and the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount, a provision for impairment is recognized to adjust the carrying amount to the recoverable amount. The recoverable amount of an asset is the higher of its value in use and its fair value less costs to sell. k)Current and noncurrent assets and liabilities An asset is recognized in the balance sheet when it is probable that its future economic benefits will flow to the Company and its cost or amount can be measured reliably. A liability is recognized in the balance sheet when the Company has a legal or constructive obligation as a result of a past event and it is probable that an outflow of funds will be required to settle the obligation. Liabilities include charges, inflation adjustments or exchange differences incurred, when applicable. Assets and liabilities are classified as current when their realization or settlement within the next twelve months is probable. Otherwise, assets and liabilities are stated as noncurrent. FS-5
l)Loans and financing Adjusted through the end of the reporting period according to exchange fluctuations or for inflation indexes, and the financial charges incurred, as contractually agreed. m)Employee benefits –pension fund and variable compensation program The Company sponsors a pension plan created in 2012, managed by a private pension fund (CBSPREV Namisa), which grants employees defined contribution pension benefit and defined risk benefits (sickness allowance, disability retirement pensions, and survivors’ pensions), funded by the sponsor (50%) and by the employees (50%). The regular contributions to the pension plan cover the net costs and are recognized in the income statement for the period when they become due. The Company’s obligation is limited to the monthly contributions made during the time an employee is working. As the risk benefits are fully tended by employees, the Company only recognizes a liability when the fund accumulated for this purpose is insufficient to cover the benefits provided. The Company recognizes a liability related to the variable compensation program and profit sharing and bonus payment expenses, calculated based on qualitative and quantitative goals set by Management and recognized in employee benefits line items, in the income statement. n)Contingent assets and liabilities, and legal obligations Provisions are recognized when the Company has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, it is probable that the Company will be required to settle the obligation, and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. Contingent assets are recognized only when there are collaterals or favorable, unappealable court decisions. Contingent assets with a probable favorable outcome are only disclosed in an explanatory note. Contingent liabilities are accrued for to the extent that the Company expects to disburse cash, losses are assessed as probable, and involved amounts can be reliably measured. When the expected likelihood of loss is assessed as possible, a description of the lawsuits and involved amounts are disclosed in the explanatory notes. Contingent liabilities whose likelihood of loss is assessed as remote are neither accrued for nor disclosed, and legal obligations are recognized as payables. o)Income tax and social contribution Taxes on profit comprise current and deferred income tax (IRPJ) and social contribution (CSLL). These taxes are recognized in the income statement, except to the extent that they relate to items recognized directly in equity. In this case, they are also recognized in equity, in other comprehensive income. Current taxes are calculated based on tax laws enacted or substantially enacted by the end of the reporting period in the countries where the Company and its subsidiaries operate and generate taxable profit. In Brazil, the statutory income tax rate is 34%. Deferred taxes are recognized on temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the financial statements, except: (i) on the initial recognition of assets and liabilities in a transaction that is not a business combination and that affects neither the taxable profit nor the accounting profit; and (ii) differencesassociated with investments in subsidiaries when it is probable that they will not reverse in the foreseeable future. FS-6
Deferred tax assets are only recognized to the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available against which those temporary differences can be utilized, based on future projected earnings prepared and supported based on internal assumptions and future economic scenarios, which may, therefore, be subject to changes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are presented on a net basis since there is a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and when they relate to income taxes imposed by the same tax authority on the same entity subject to taxation. p)Investments Investments are stated at cost, less a provision for impairment, where applicable. q)Distribution of dividends The distribution of dividends to the Company’s shareholders is recognized as a liability in the Company’s financial statements at the end of the year, according to its bylaws. Any amount in excess of the mandatory minimum dividend is accrued on the date it is approved by the shareholders at the General Meeting. r)Segment information The financial statements do not include segment information because the Company operates only in the iron ore processing and sale operating segment, which is consistent with the internal reports used as basis for the Executive Committee's assessments and strategic decision-making. s)Net operating revenue Revenue from the sale of iron ore in the normal course of business is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. Operating revenue is recognized when there is convincing evidence that the most significant risks and rewards of ownership of goods have been transferred to the buyer, it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the Company, the associated costs and possible returns can be reliably estimated, there is no continued involvement with the goods sold, and the amount of the operating revenue can be reliably measured. If it is probable that discounts will be granted and the value thereof can be reliably measured, then the discount is recognized as a reduction of the operating revenue as sales are recognized. Due to the individual terms of the sales and freight agreement, the transfer of the risks and rewards usually takes place when the products are load into the ship, in the port of origin. t)Finance income and finance costs Finance income comprises interest earned on short-term investments and prepayments to related parties, dividends (except for dividends received by investees accounted for under equity method), and changes in the fair value of financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss. Interest income is recognized in the income statement under the effective interest method. Dividend income is recognized in the income statement when theCompany’s right to receive the payment has been established. Distributions received from investees accounted for using the equity method reduce the value of the investment. FS-7
Finance costs include interest on loans, net of discount to present value of provisions, changes in the fair value of financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss, and impairment losses recognized in financial assets. Loans costs that are not directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset are measured through the income statement using the effective interest method. Exchange gains and losses are reported on a net basis. u)Financial instruments Financial assets and liabilities ·Financial assets Financial assets can be classified in the following categories: (i) at fair value through profit or loss; (ii) held to maturity; (iii) loans and receivables; and (iv) available for sale. The classification depends on the nature and purpose of the financial assets and is determined on initial recognition. The Company does not have assets classified as held to maturity and available for sale. (i)At fair value through profit or loss Financial assets are measured at fair value through profit or loss when they are held for trading, or are designated as measured at fair value through profit or loss on their initial recognition. Financial assets are classified as held for trading when acquired principally for the purpose of selling them in the short term. A financial asset that is not held for trading may be designated as at fair value through profit on initial recognition, when such designation eliminates or significantly reduces a measurement or recognition inconsistency. Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are stated at fair value, with any gains or losses recognized in the income statement. Net gains or losses recognized in the income statement incorporate any dividends or interest earned on the financial asset. (ii)Loans and receivables These are financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market, measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment, where applicable. Interest income is recognized using the effective interest method. Effective interest method It is a method of calculating the amortized cost of a financial asset or a financial liability and of allocating interest income or interest expenses over the period. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts the estimated future cash receipts or payments (including all fees paid or received that form an integral part of the effective interest rate,transaction costs, and other premiums or discounts) through the expected life of the financial asset, or, where appropriate, a shorter period. FS-8
·Financial liabilities Financial liabilities can be classified as: (i) financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss; or (ii) other financial liabilities. The Company does not have financial liabilities measured at fair value. Other financial liabilities are initially measured at fair value, less transaction costs, and are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, with interest expense recognized on a yield basis. The effective interest method is a method of calculating the amortized cost of a financial liability and allocating interest expense over the year. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments through the expected life of the financial liability or, where appropriate, a shorter period. v)New standards, amendments to and interpretations of standards that are not yet effective
The following standards, amendments to standards and IFRS interpretations issued by the IASB are not yet effective and were not early adopted by the Group for eleven months ended November 30, 2015: Standard | Description | Effective date | IAS 16 and IAS 38 | Property, Plant and Equipment andIntangible Assets – in May 2014 these accounting standards were revised to clarify that the revenue method will no longer be permitted for depreciation or amortization purposes. | 2016 | IFRS 10 and IAS 28 | Consolidated Financial Statements andInvestments in Associates and Joint Ventures – in September 2014 a revision was issued proposing that the gain or loss resulting from the sale or contribution of a subsidiary that does not constitute a business as defined in IFRS 3 to an investor’s subsidiary or joint venture should only be recognized to the extent of the unrelated investors' interests in the subsidiary or joint venture. | 2016 | IFRS 7 | Financial Instruments: Disclosures – in September 2014 the IASB revised IFRS 7 to provide guidance to clarify whether a servicing contract is continuing involvement and that the additional disclosure requirements are not specific for interim reporting periods. This change has not yet been ratified by the CPC and should be adopted from 2016, with earlier application permitted. | 2016 |
FS-9
Standard | Description | Effective date | IFRS 9 | Financial Instruments. IFRS 9 retains, but simplifies, the combined measurement model and establishes two main measurement categories of financial assets: amortized cost and fair value. The classification basis depends on the entity’s business model and the characteristics of the financial asset's contractual cash flow. IFRS 9 retains most of IAS 39 requirements for financialliabilities. The main change refers to those cases where thefair value of thefinancialliabilities must be segregated so that the fair value portion related to the entity’s credit risk is recognized in “Other comprehensive income” and not in profit or loss for the period. The guidance on IAS 39 on the impairment of financial assets and hedge accounting is still applicable. | 2018 | IFRS 11 | The amendments to IFRS 11 provide guidance on how to account for the acquisition of a joint operation that constitutes a business as defined in IFRS 3 for a business combination. The amendments also make it clear that the equity interest previously held in a joint operation is not re-measured on the acquisition of an additional equity interest in the same joint operation for as long as joint control is retained. | 2016 | IFRS15 | Revenue from Contracts with Customers.This new standard introduces the principles that an entity will apply to determine the revenue measurement and when such revenue shall be recognized. IFRS15 replaces IAS 11Construction Contracts, IAS 18Revenue, and related interpretations. | 2018 | IFRS16 | Defines the principles for recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases. IFRS 16 replaces IAS17 - Leases and related interpretations. | 2019 |
There are no other standards, amendments to standards and interpretations not yet effective that the Group expects to have a material impact on its financial statements. FS-10
3.CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSThe subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date control is obtained through the date the control ceases. The subsidiaries’ accounting policies are aligned with the policies adopted by the Company. The financial statements used in the consolidation process are prepared based on the accounting policies described above and include the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries listed below, and have been prepared in accordance with the following criteria: (a) elimination of intragroup balances between consolidated companies; (b) elimination of the Parent Company’s investments against the related investee’s equity, as applicable; (c) elimination of revenues and expenses arising from transactions between consolidated companies; and (d) elimination of profits on inventories, when applicable, arising from sales between consolidated companies. | | | Companies | 2015 | 2014 | Main activities |
| | | | Direct interest: | | | | Full consolidation | | | | Namisa International Minérios, S.L.U. | 100.00 | 100.00 | Financial transactions, product sales and holding equity interests | | | | | Indirect interests: | | | | Full consolidation | | | | Namisa Europe, LDA. | 100.00 | 100.00 | Ore sale and financial transactions | Namisa Handel GmbH | 100.00 | 100.00 | Ore sale and financial transactions | CSN Handel GmbH | 100.00 | - | Ore sale and financial transactions | Namisa Ásia Limited | 100.00 | 100.00 | Commercial representation |
3.1 ACQUISITION OF CSN HANDEL GMBH On November 30, 2015 Namisa’s subsidiary Namisa Handel GmbH acquired from CSN its wholly-owned subsidiary CSN Handel GmbH. This acquisition was foreseen in the Investment Agreement entered into by CSN and the Asian Consortium, as mentioned in Note 1, as part of the restructuring of the mining activities concentrated on Congonhas Minérios S.A. The purpose of Namisa Handel and CSN Handel is to trade iron ore in the international market. As per the Investment Agreement the transaction price shall be paid up to 4 months as from the transaction date and was determined considering the net assets at their book value as of November 30, 2015, which was of R$71,720. The transaction did not generate gain nor loss. The assets acquired and the liabilities assumed of CSN Handel, which were merged into Namisa, are described in Note 25. In accordance with IFRS 3, this transaction was considered a business combination under common control and was recorded at book value and, consequently, the acquisition method was not applied. FS-11
4.CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | 2015 | 2014 | | | | Cash and bank deposit accounts | 16,009 | 2,105 | Short-term investments | | | In Brazil (a) | 150,791 | 516,743 | Abroad (b) | 366,970 | 4,980,291 | | 517,761 | 5,497,034 | Total | 533,770 | 5,499,139 |
(a)Fixed income - are investments in Bank Deposit Certificates (CDBs) and debentures with yield linked to the variation of the Interbank Deposit Certificate (CDI). These investments yield approximately 100% of the CDI variation and can be immediately redeemed by the Company, without risks of significant changes in their carrying amount. (b)Time deposits - temporary deposits in prime banks with daily liquidity, yielding fixed rates until 0.82% per year (0.35% to 0.55% per year in 2014). 5.TRADE RECEIVABLES | 2015 | 2014 | | | | Current: | | | Trade receivables - related parties (note 8) | 180,068 | 2,751 | Foreign customers | 540,991 | 123,975 | Total | 721,059 | 126,726 |
As of November 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, there were no past-due receivables and the average days on sales outstanding over the year was 37 days (41 days in 2014). To determine the trade receivables recoverability, the Company takes into consideration any change in the customer’s creditworthiness from the date the credit was originally granted through the end of the reporting period. 6.INVENTORIES | 2015 | 2014 | | | | Finished goods | 36,370 | 37,546 | Raw materials | 571 | 8,974 | Storeroom supplies | 27,352 | 30,931 | Total | 64,293 | 77,451 |
The Company assesses periodically the need to recognize a provision for inventory at realizable value and, as of November 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, there was no need to recognize such a provision. FS-12
7. RECOVERABLE TAXES | 2015 | 2014 | | | | Income tax and social contribution overpaid | 21,542 | 729 | State VAT (ICMS) | 135,934 | 137,386 | Taxes on revenue (PIS and COFINS) | - | 4,980 | Withholding Income Tax (IRRF) | 8,134 | 1,384 | Other | 168 | 276 | Total | 165,778 | 144,755 | | | | Current | 35,578 | 21,077 | Noncurrent | 130,200 | 123,678 | Total | 165,778 | 144,755 |
The increase on income tax and social contribution overpaid refers to credits of income tax on financial investments redemptions only used to reduce tax payable on December, 2015 (there was no taxable income until November). The noncurrent portion refers basically to ICMS credits. Namisa is predominantly an export company, accumulating ICMS credits in its branches, mainly in Congonhas-MG due to its mining processing operations with CSN and also in Ouro Preto and Fernandinho due to its purchases of electric power and diesel. The Company's management periodically assesses the recovery of ICMS credits and concluded that it is not necessary to record any provision for impairment of these credits. The Company has been successful in realizing the ICMS credits through the acquisition of trucks for iron ore transportation. As described in note 1 to the financial statements, the Company will be merged into Congonhas Minerios, the Company ensures that it will use the entire balance of ICMS credits in domestic sales, mainly to supply CSN’s demands. 8.RELATED-PARTY BALANCES AND TRANSACTIONS The Company’s operations are integrated with CSN, mainly the supply of iron ore from Casa Pedra, the port loading at the Coal Terminal (TECAR) in Itaguaí, RJ, and the use of railway transportation with MRS Logística S.A. (“MRS Logística”). As of November 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the balances of assets and liabilities and the transaction amounts are as follows: FS-13
a)Balance sheet accounts | | | | | MRS | Asian | | | MRS | Asian | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Assets | | | | | | | | | Current assets: | | | | | | | | | Trade receivables | 180,068 | - | - | 180,068 | 2,751 | - | - | 2,751 | Other receivables (1) | 147,335 | - | - | 147,335 | 51,874 | - | - | 51,874 | Dividends (1) | - | 15,156 | - | 15,156 | - | 9,011 | - | 9,011 | Prepayments (2) | 113,847 | - | - | 113,847 | 247,077 | - | - | 247,077 | Total | 441,250 | 15,156 | - | 456,406 | 301,703 | 9,911 | - | 310,714 | Noncurrent assets: | | | | | | | | | Prepayments (2) | 9,310,901 | - | - | 9,310,901 | 9,236,170 | - | - | 9,236,170 | Total | 9,310,901 | - | - | 9,310,901 | 9,236,170 | - | - | 9,236,170 | | | | | | | | | | Liabilities | | | | | | | | | Current liabilities: | | | | | | | | | Trade payables | 549,141 | 3,342 | - | 552,483 | 11,558 | 2,314 | - | 13,872 | Loans and financing (note 13) | - | - | - | - | 364,118 | - | - | 364,118 | Dividends (note 16) | 694.080 | - | 462,720 | 1,156,800 | 33,458 | - | 22,306 | 55,764 | Other payables | 176,115 | 837 | - | 176,952 | 74,720 | 3,999 | - | 78,719 | Total | 1,419,336 | 4,179 | 462,720 | 1,886,235 | 483,854 | 6,313 | 22,306 | 512,473 |
(1)Refer to amounts recorded in the balance sheet, in line item ‘Loans and receivables’. (2)Refer to amounts recorded in the balance sheet, in line item ‘Advances to suppliers’. FS-14
b) Related-party transactions | | | | Income statement | | | | | Revenues | 176,070 | - | - | 176,070 | Costs | (105,452) | (87,069) | - | (192,521) | Finance income (expense), net | (5,904) | 6,145 | - | 241 | Exchange gains (losses), net | (80,706) | - | - | (80,706) | Total | (15,992) | (80,924) | - | (96,916) | | | | | Income statement | | | | | Revenues | 7,126 | - | - | 7,126 | Costs | (316,355) | (174,329) | - | (490,684) | Finance income (expense), net | 1,028,431 | 21,102 | - | 1,049,533 | Exchange gains (losses), net | (50,412) | - | - | (50,412) | Total | 668,790 | (153,227) | - | 515,563 | | | | | | | | Income statement | CSN | MRS Logística | Asian Consortium | Total | Revenues | 20,495 | - | 223,146 | 243,641 | Costs | (330,910) | (206,826) | - | (537,736) | Finance income (expense), net | 1,022,217 | 33,325 | - | 1,055,542 | Exchange gains (losses), net | (43,854) | - | - | (43,854) | Total | 667,948 | (173,501) | 223,146 | 717,593 |
c)Description of agreements with related parties The following is a description of the main transactions with related parties: i)CSN – prepayment and ore exports The Company entered into long-term agreements with CSN for port operation services and raw iron ore supply (“ROM”) from the Casa de Pedra mine, as described below: ·Port operation services and iron ore supply agreement On December 30, 2008, the Company entered into an agreement to acquire port services and purchase iron ore with CSN, for an estimated 34-year period. The volume agreed is 1.7 billion metric tons of raw iron ore and port services for a volume of 1.1 billion metric tons. The Company prepaid the equivalent to approximately 50% of the value added of ROM and port services, amounting to R$7.3 billion. Until December 12, 2014, the prepaid amounts were adjusted for interest at the rate of 12.5% per year. On December 12, 2014, the Company’s shareholders approved the “Transitional Agreement”, an investment agreement for a new strategic alliance between CSN and the Asian Consortium aimed at consolidating the mining activities at Congonhas, currently a subsidiary of CSN, which will involve, among other actions, the merger of the Company (“Transaction”). The “Transitional Agreement” canceled the clauses that established interest of 12.5% p.a. on these agreements, including the creation of a resolutory condition linked to the consummation of the transaction that will reestablish the collection of interest retroactively, if this transaction does not materialize. The Transaction was concluded through the signing of a new Congonhas shareholders agreement on November 30, 2015, ratifying that there is no need to recognize interest of 12.5% p.a. on these agreements retroactively. As result of the conclusion of the transaction between CSN and Asian Consortium, on December 31, 2015, these agreements were extinguished by the merger of Namisa into Congonhas. FS-15
ii) Loans (export prepayments)The Company entered into export prepayment financial agreements with certain CSN subsidiaries, which are detailed in note 13. During the first semester of 2015, these agreements were totally paid. iii)MRS Logística The Company entered into a long-term railway transportation service agreement to ship and handle its production. The obligations assumed and the amounts involved as detailed in note 15. iv)Asian Consortium The Company usually exports its products to the members of the Asian Consortium, under long-term agreements and at prices based on market quotations, but there was no sales in 2014 and 2015 years. v)Namisa Handel GmbH (“Namisa Handel”) The Company exports iron ore to Namisa Handel, which is its wholly-owned subsidiary, to sell the iron ore in the international market. d)Management compensation The key management personnel, who have the authority and responsibility for planning, managing and controlling Company operations, include the members of the Board of Directors, the statutory officers, and the other officers. The table below shows the breakdown of their compensation during 2015, 2014 and 2013: | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | Short-term benefits | 2,282 | 3,467 | 2,549 | Post-employment benefits | 25 | 24 | 22 | Total | 2,307 | 3,491 | 2,571 | | | | |
9.INCOME TAX AND SOCIAL CONTRIBUTION a)Income tax and social contribution recognized in the income statement are as follows: | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | Current | (162,062) | (359,070) | (1,220,138) | Deferred | 13,098 | (153,843) | (323,738) | Total | (148,964) | (512,913) | (1,543,876) |
FS-16
b) The reconciliation of the consolidated income tax and social contribution expenses with the effective statutory rates is as follows: | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | Profit before income tax and social contribution | 2,055,450 | 1,616,393 | 2,436,732 | Income tax and social contribution expenses based on pretax profit, at their combined statutory rate | 34% | 34% | 34% | | (698,853) | (549,574) | (828,489) | | | | | Effect of income tax on permanent differences: | | | | Tax-exempt foreign profit | 561,078 | (456) | 183,888 | Transfer pricing adjustments (PECEX) | (10,695) | (3,954) | (22,862) | Adjustment to the 2013 provision for income tax and social contribution to calculate the effective obligation | - | 23,808 | - | REFIS – Law 12,864/13 – reversal of fine and interest | - | - | 114,466 | REFIS – Law 12,864/13 – principal (income tax and social contribution) | - | - | (995,383) | Other permanent differences | (494) | 17,263 | 4,504 | Income tax and social contribution expenses | (148,964) | (512,913) | (1,543,876) |
c)Deferred income tax and social contribution are recognized to reflect the future tax effects attributable to temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts, as shown below: | | | 2015 | 2014 | | | | Assets: | | | Provision for losses - advances to suppliers | 3,297 | 3,297 | Operating provisions related to energy, services and other | 47,740 | 33,371 | IRPJ/CSLL liability – goodwill Cayman and CFM deducted under the Transitional Tax Regime (RTT) | (196,700) | (196,700) | Other | 5,545 | 8,158 | Total | (140,118) | (151,874) | | | |
The movement in the deferred taxes balance in the eleven month-period ended November 30, 2015 and year ended December 31, 2014 is as follows: | | | 2015 | 2014 | | | | Opening balance | (151,874) | 1,968 | Goodwill amortization for tax purposes | - | (162,383) | Recognition of operating provisions | 14,369 | 12,531 | Adjustments for temporarily nondeductible inventories | (6,553) | (3,990) | Other | 3,940 | - | Closing balance | (140,118) | (151,874) |
FS-17
Law 12,973/14, enacted in May 2014, brought significant changes to tax legislation, which among others, revoked the Transition Tax Regime (RTT).Theses changes directly affects the determination of the income tax and social contribution basis. As from 2015, the application of the Law is mandatory and CSN applied the Law´s requirements. 10.INVESTMENTS | 2015 and 2014 | Investment in equity securities: | | MRS Logística S.A. | 171,760 | | |
The following is a brief description of the investments: · CADE approvalMRS Logística In November 2008, CSN capitalized at Namisa 10% of mergerthe nonvoting, nonconvertible class “A” preferred shares of MRS Logística, for R$172 million, as disclosed in the subscription report and share valuation report issued by MRS Logística. MRS Logística is a corporation engaged in the operation and development of public cargo railway transportation services in the Southeast, which covers Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, and Belo Horizonte. The investment in MRS is stated at historical cost. 11.PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT a)Breakdown of property, plant and equipment | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Land | | 4,442 | - | 4,442 | | 4,442 | - | 4,442 | Buildings | 2,90 | 191,511 | (15,066) | 176,445 | 2.25 | 120,417 | (10,251) | 110,166 | Furniture and fixtures | 7.91 | 5,429 | (2,563) | 2,866 | 7.82 | 5,654 | (2,328) | 3,326 | Vehicles | 13.21 | 1,068 | (587) | 481 | 13.19 | 1,068 | (458) | 610 | Machinery, equipment and facilities | 7.49 | 240,850 | (102,834) | 138,016 | 11.12 | 208,844 | (81,042) | 127,802 | Computer equipment | 12.69 | 3,803 | (3,181) | 622 | 12.69 | 3,830 | (2,843) | 987 | Mines and ore deposits | (*) | 3,172 | (158) | 3,014 | (*) | 13,232 | (1,625) | 11,607 | Improvements in infrastructure and drainage | 4.00 | 11,054 | (533) | 10,521 | 4.00 | 10,465 | (140) | 10,325 | Leasehold improvements | 2.00 | 50,422 | (2,249) | 48,173 | 1.97 | 51,592 | (2,577) | 49,015 | Other assets | | 5,925 | - | 5,925 | | 4,766 | - | 4,766 | Construction in progress | | 121,072 | - | 121,072 | | 240,663 | - | 240,663 | Total | | 638,748 | (127,171) | 511,577 | | 664,973 | (101,264) | 563,709 |
(*) The depletion of ore deposits is calculated based on the volume of ore extracted as compared to the mineable reserve, and the Company estimates that the deposits will be depleted in 30 years. b)Construction in progress Costs classified as construction in progress are basically composed of services acquired and parts and pieces purchased, to be used as investments for performance improvement, technological upgrading, expansion, and acquisition of Companhia Brasileira de Latas by Companhia Metalúrgica Pradaassets, which will be transferred tothe related line items and depreciated from the moment they become available for use. As of November 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the balance is apportioned among the following projects: FS-18
Main projects | 2015 | 2014 | Expansion of administrative facilities | 807 | 13,333 | Expansion of production capacity – Pires | 66,012 | 143,187 | Pelletization plant | 32,107 | 31,187 | Expansion of production capacity – Fernandinho | - | 17,074 | Other | 22,146 | 34,882 | | 121,072 | 240,663 |
c)Movement in property, plant and equipment: | | | | | | | | Opening balance | Additions | Transfer | Depreciation | Other movements (*) | Closing balance | | | | | | | | Land | 4,442 | - | - | - | (1) | 4,442 | Buildings | 110,166 | - | 72,740 | (5,009) | (1,452) | 176,445 | Machinery, equipment and facilities | 127,802 | 559 | 38,077 | (31,082) | 2,660 | 138,016 | Furniture and fixtures | 3,326 | 119 | - | (358) | (221) | 2,866 | Vehicles | 610 | - | - | (129) | - | 481 | Computer equipment | 987 | - | 5 | (362) | (8) | 622 | Mines and ore deposits | 11,607 | - | - | (1) | (8,562) | 3,014 | Improvements in infrastructure and drainage | 10,325 | - | 589 | (393) | - | 10,521 | Leasehold improvements | 49,015 | - | 80 | (919) | (3) | 48,173 | Other assets | 4,766 | 306 | 127 | - | 853 | 5,925 | Construction in progress | 240,663 | 16,561 | (111,490) | - | (24,662) | 121,072 | Total | 563,709 | 17,545 | - | (38,253) | (31,424) | 511,577 |
(*) During the year the Company transferred R$39,285, related to the assets of Fernandinho, Cayman and Pedras Pretas, as described on General Information, for the Transaction proposes, compensate with acquisition of some trucks with ICMS credits (R$7,154). FS-19
12. INTANGIBLE ASSETSThe carrying amounts of intangible assets as of November 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are as follows: | | | | Amortization rate | | Accumulated | | | | | | | | | | | | Goodwill – CFM | - | 578,531 | - | 578,531 | Software | 19.94 | 6,484 | (3,046) | 3,437 | Total | | 585,015 | (3,046) | 581,968 | | | | | | | | | | Amortization rate | | Accumulated | | | | | | | | | | | | Goodwill – CFM | - | 578,531 | - | 578,531 | Software | 19.94 | 6,442 | (1,863) | 4,579 | Total | | 584,973 | (1,863) | 583,110 | | | | | |
Nature of goodwill based on future profitability In July 2007, Namisa acquired Companhia de Fomento Mineral e Participações - CFM (“CFM”), located in Ouro Preto, State of Minas Gerais, and its wholly-owned subsidiary Cayman Mineração do Brasil Ltda. (“Cayman”), which were engaged in the extraction of iron ore and also owned iron ore processing facilities in the same State. The goodwill arising on this transaction is based on expected future profitability and was allocated to a single CGU since the Company operates only in the mining segment and all its assets generate cash flows together. This amount has not been amortized since 2009 due to the adoption of the international financial reporting standards (IFRS) and its carrying amount represents the net amount existing when the amortization was discontinued. Impairment test The recoverable amount of a CGU is determined based on value-in-use calculations. These calculations use cash flow projections, before income tax and social contribution, based on the business plan approved by Management. To prepare the cash flow projection that supported this valuation, the Company adopted the following assumptions: ·Gross margin: this margin was calculated based on the expansion plans already approved in the Company’s business plan. The iron ore prices in the international market were used as basis in projections prepared by official mining industry institutions and the foreign exchange rate was calculated using a projected US dollar curve in real terms through 2019, disclosed by the Central Bank of Brazil (BACEN), since from 2019 onward the change used is zero. ·Cost adjustment: cost adjustment was based on historical data and price and foreign exchange curves used in industry reports. FS-20
·Growth rate: the cash flow projection period extends to 2067 due to the length of some projects’ implementation periods and the termination dates of the main agreements based on which the business plan was developed. It is not necessary, therefore, to take into consideration a growth rate since the projection period exceeds 50 years. ·Discount rate: set at 13.91% per year, after taxes on income. 13.LOANS AND FINANCING | | | | | | Current liabilities: | | | PPE - related parties (note 8). | - | 364,118 | National Bank for Economic and Social Development (BNDES) – FINAME | 4,680 | 4,700 | | 4,680 | 368,818 | | | | Noncurrent liabilities: | | | | | | National Bank for Economic and Social Development (BNDES) – FINAME | 25,307 | 29,541 | | | | Total | 29,987 | 398,359 | | | |
The table below shows fundings, payments and accruals on our loans and financings during the year: | | | | | | | 11/30/2015 | | 12/31/2014 | Opening balance | | 398,359 | | 382,209 | Funding transactions | | - | | 15,747 | Payment of principal | | (441,938) | | (49,408) | Interest payments | | (3,035) | | (23,017) | Provision of interest | | 2,797 | | 24,682 | Foreign exchange | | 73,804 | | 48,146 | Closing balance | | 29,987 | | 398,359 |
Loans and financing from related parties paid in 2015 refer basically to export prepayments with CSN’s subsidiaries. The outstanding balance is related to BNDES loan to purchase operating equipment, amounting to R$29,987 (R$34,241 as of December, 2014), with average repayment term of 100 months and bearing interest between 5.5% and 8.0% per year, payable on a monthly basis. The maturities of the noncurrent portion of the loans are disclosed in note 23.d). None of the existing loan agreements contain restrictive covenants. The agreements entered into with the BNDES are collateralized by the financed assets. FS-21
14.PROVISION FOR RISKS The provisions for risks were estimated by Management based on information provided by its legal counsel (in-house and external), who analyzed the outstanding lawsuits. The provisions were set up in an amount considered sufficient to cover potential losses on the outstanding lawsuits, as follows: | 2015 | 2014 | | | | Labor | 4,391 | 149 | Civil | 21 | - | Environmental | 3,074 | 977 | Total | 7,486 | 1,126 |
Additionally, the Company is party to other lawsuits classified by the legal counsel as possible losses, which totaled R$2,950,525 as of November 30, 2015 (R$2,626,004 as of December 31, 2014), of which R$19,294 (R$21,381 as of December 31, 2014) in labor lawsuits, R$67,531 (R$1,786 as of December 31, 2014) in civil lawsuits, R$2,843,096 (R$2,593,015 as of December 31, 2014) in tax lawsuits, and R$20,604 (R$9,863 as of December 31, 2014) in environmental lawsuits.We present below a brief description of the most significant lawsuits with the likelihood of loss as possible: a)Administrative proceeding - IRPJ/CSLL assessment notice on profits abroad amounting to R$330,908 (R$285,825 as of December 31, 2014), including principal, fine, and interest: this tax assessment notice refers to the assessment of income tax and social contribution on 2008 profits reported by foreign subsidiaries. b)Administrative proceeding - IRRF assessment notice of R$170,178 (R$161,530 as of December 31, 2014), including principal, fine, and interest: this tax assessment notice refers to the assessment of a Withholding Income Tax (IRRF), allegedly due by Namisa as the taxpayer responsible for withholding and payment of the tax levied on the capital gain earned by a legal entity domiciled abroad, which sold an asset in Brazil. c)Administrative proceeding - IRPJ/CSLL assessment notice of R$2,242,166 (R$2,036,676 as of December 31, 2014), including principal, fine, and interest: this tax assessment refers to the disallowance of the amortization of goodwill expenses in 2009, 2010 and 2011, as a result of the merger of Big Jump Energy Participações S.A. FS-22
15.CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS In January 2011 the Company, together with the shareholder CSN, entered into an iron ore railway transportation agreement with MRS Logística, for a 16-year period. This agreement contains a clause that ensures a minimum payment of 80% of the volume contracted, irrespective of the volume carried (“take-or-pay”). The minimum future payment required until the termination of the agreement is approximately R$3,959,054, distributed as follows: 2015 | 10,535 | 2016 | 166,806 | 2017 | 175,146 | 2018 | 210,514 | 2019 | 227,342 | Others years | 3,168,711 | Total | 3,959,054 |
16.SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY a)Paid-in capital The Company’s paid-in capital is R$1,961,510 (R$2,800,000 as of December 31, 2014), represented by 472,236,944 (475,067,405 as of December 31, 2014) common shares without par value, of which are held by the shareholders as follows: December 31, 2014 and November 30, 2015 (before the transaction described in Note 1) Shareholders | Country | Number of shares | Equity interest (%) | | | | | Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional | Brazil | 285,040,443 | 60.00 | Brazil Japan Iron Ore Corporation | Japan | 154,491,661 | 32.52 | POSCO | South Korea | 30,784,627 | 6.48 | China Steel Corporation | China | 4,750,674 | 1.00 | Total | | 475,067,405 | 100.00 |
November 30, 2015 (after transaction described in Note 1) Shareholders | Country | Ordinary | Preferred | Total shares | Equity interest (%) | | | | | | | Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional | Brazil | 282,209,982 | - | 282,209,982 | 59.76 | Congonhas Minérios S.A. | Brazil | 86,262,061 | 103,764,901 | 190,026,962 | 40.24 | Total | | 368,472,043 | 103,764,901 | 472,236,944 | 100.00 |
December 31, 2015 (before merger by Congonhas described in Note 1) Shareholders | Country | Ordinary | Preferred | Total shares | Equity interest (%) | | | | | | | Congonhas Minérios S.A. | Brazil | 368,472,043 | 103,764,901 | 472,236,944 | 100.00 |
FS-23
On February 20,2013,12, 2015, the Company paid as capital reduction of R$777,930, after 60 days from the act publication date of the Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting held on December 12, 2014. With such capital reduction, the Company’s capital was decrease from R$2,800,000 to R$2,022,070. In 2014, the main corporate acts analyzed in meetings were: (i)At the Annual Shareholders Meeting held on March 28, 2014 the shareholders approved the consolidated financial statements of Namisa for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. The allocation of the profit for the year ended December 31, 2013 to an earnings reserve was approved, as set out in Article 195 of Law 6,404/76. The shareholders also approved the payment of the remaining balance of the dividends proposed for the year ended December 31, 2011 amounting to R$336,673. (ii)At the Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting held on July 17, 2014 the shareholders approved the proposal for bylaws of the recently created subsidiary Namisa Asia Limited. (iii)At the Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting held on December 12, 2014, agreements were signed with related parties in order to consolidate the mining assets of the shareholder CSN with those of the Company, as described in General Information. (iv)At the Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting held on December 12, 2014 the shareholders approved the Company’s capital reduction by R$777,930 to be paid in 2015. In 2015, the main corporate acts analyzed in meetings were: (v)At the Annual Shareholders Meeting held on April 30, 2015 the shareholders approved the consolidated financial statements of Namisa for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. The allocation of the profit for the year ended December 31, 2014 was approved as follows: (a) the amount of R$1,047,716 to earnings reserve, as set out in Article 195 of Law 6,404/76; (b) the remaining amount of R$55,764as dividends proposed for the year ended December 31, 2015. (vi)At the Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting held on November 30, 2015, the shareholders deliberates as dividends the amount of R$6,499,436 (R$5,977,397 from earning reserves and R$522,039 from part of the profits from de current year), as describe in notes 16.d), 16.e) and 16.f). The payment of R$5,342,636 was made at the same date and R$1,156,800 will be made until November 30, 2016. (vii)At the Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting held on November 30, 2015, the shareholders approved a partial split involving the assets of Fernandinho, Cayman and Pedras Pretas for merger in the Mineração Nacional S.A., a CSN subsidiary, at a book value of R$60,560 according to the appraisal report. As a result of this split of assets, the capital was reduced in the same amount. (viii)At the Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting held on November 30, 2015, the shareholders approved a conversion of 103,764,901 ordinary shares owned by Congonhas to preferred shares. These preferred shares have: a) full voting rights; b) priority on payments of fixed annual dividends corresponding to 0,000000160606500383614% of the Company’s capital. FS-24
(ix)At the Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting held on November 30, 2015, the shareholders declare and paid, on this date, dividends of R$326,891 from the current profit of the year, based on the extraordinary balance sheet of September 30, 2015, to the owners of preferred shares. FS-25
b)Capital reserve The capital reserve of R$6,473,699 as of November 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 comprises R$5,081,840 recognized on December 30, 2008 related to premium arising on the issuance of 187,749,249 new registered common shares, without par value, subscribed and paid in by Big Jump Energy Participações S.A., at the unit price of R$38.81, of which R$3.08 represents the unitary issuance price, set according to Article 170, II, of Law 6,404/76, and R$35.73 per share was allocated to the capital reserve; and special goodwill reserve on the merger of Big Jump Energy Participações S.A., amounting to R$1,391,859, as approved at the Extraordinary Shareholders Meeting held on July 30, 2009. c)Legal reserve Since 2012 the Company, in its interpretation of Article 193, paragraph 1, of the aforementioned Law, has not recognized the legal reserve as it understands that its capital reserves exceed 30% of the issued capital. d)Allocation of results Until the signing of the Investment Agreement on December 12, 2014 between CSN and the Asian Consortium described in Note 1, management questioned the contractual interests mechanism that was used for adjusting the prepayment balances under the operating agreements mentioned in Note 8(c) because it was understood that the interests were causing distortions on the acquisitioncash flows and results of control,operations of Companhia Brasileira de Latas (“CBL”) by the Companhia Metalúrgica Prada (“PRADA”)Company. Considering this, management submitted to the Board of Directors a proposal to address the contractual interests issue, which was not approved by the Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (“CADE”).Board of Directors. The financial statements related to the years ended before and as of December 31, 2014 were prepared based on the terms of the agreements and included the interests accrual capitalized on the prepayment balances at the contractually established interest rates. As a result, the amount under discussion of interests accrued throughout those years was not fully paid as dividends and, instead, were retained in a specific reserve. In this context, the amounts allocated to that specific reserve basically corresponded to the interests income generated from the operating agreements in the three-yearperiod ended December 31, 2014, as illustrated below. Finally, as a result of the Investment Agreement signed in December 2014, CSN and the Asian Consortium agreed to extinguish the interests accrual on the operating agreements and determined the payment as dividends of the full amount retained in that specific reserve. As these financial statements were not prepared for the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2015, as explained in Note 2, the Brazilian Corporate Law does not require the Company to propose and approve in a General Meeting the distribution of net results based on the eleven-month period ended November 30, 2015. | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | | | | | Profit of the period / year | 1,744,848 | 1,103,480 | 892,856 | Proposed dividends | (848,930) | (55,764) | - | Earnings reserve | 895,918 | (1,047,716) | (892,856) |
FS-26
·e) Export Credit Loans issueDividends
The Company's bylaws foresees for the payment of minimum dividends equivalent to 50% of the net profit for the year, adjusted according to the corporate law (Law 6404/76); however, in the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, in order to avoid the payment of dividends that may be affected by the above mentioned discussions that are still pending, no dividends were proposed for 2013, such decision was ratified at the Shareholders Meeting held on March 28, 2014. Regarding the profit for the year ended December 31, 2014 dividends were proposed in the limit of the operating results, amounting to R$55,764. As a condition to sign a new Congonhas Shareholders Agreement, the shareholders approve on November 30, 2015, in a Extraodinary Shareholders Meeting, to distribute dividends of R$6,499,436, of which R$5,977,397 from Earnings reserve and R$522,039 from the Profit of the year 2015. The shareholders also approve to distribute and paid a fixed dividends of R$326,891 from the Profit of the year 2015, to the preferred shareholders. f)Earnings reserve The Extraodinary Shareholders Meeting on November 30, 2015 deliberates to use R$5,977,397 to distribute extraordinary dividends from earning reserves. In view of the scenario previously described, Company's Management proposes the allocation of a portion of the results for the years ended December 31, 2014 for the recognition of earnings reserve as required by Article 196 of Law 6,404/76, amounting to R$1,047,716 (R$ 892,856 in 2013). There is no deliberation for the remaining Profit of the year 2015 of R$895,918 as on November 30, 2015. 17.EARNINGS PER SHARE Basic earnings per share were calculated based on profit for the year divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. The Company does not have treasury shares. Earnings per share were calculated as shown in the table below: | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | | | | | Profit attributable to Namisa’s owners | 1,744,849 | 1,103,480 | 892,856 | Fixed dividends on prefered shares | 326,891 | - | - | Profit on ordinary shares attributable to Namisa 's owners | 1,417,958 | 1,103,480 | 892,856 | Weighted average number of thousand of shares | 474,810 | 475,067 | 475,067 | Basic earnings per thousand shares | 2,9864 | 2,3228 | 1.8794 | | | | | Preferred shares number of thousand of shares | 103,766 | | | Basic earnings per thousand shares | 3,1503 | | |
The Company issued Indoes not have instruments convertible into shares in the first quarter of 2013 Export Credit Loans totaling R$345,000.reporting years, therefore, basic earnings per share are equal to diluted earnings per share. FS-78FS-27
18.NET OPERATING REVENUE The reconciliation between gross revenues and net revenues disclosed in the income statement is detailed below. The decrease in net revenues in 2015 compared to 2014 and 2014 compared to 2013 was due to the lower prices and lower volume produced and sold during the year. The increase in the domestic market in 2015 was due to implementation of services provided to CSN.
| 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | | | | | Gross operating revenue: | | | | Domestic market | 191,902 | 21,654 | 38,681 | Foreign market | 603,164 | 1,403,054 | 2,298,172 | Accrual for price adjustment according to sales contracts | (23,419) | (53,070) | (41,658) | | 771,647 | 1,477,778 | 2,378,511 | Deductions: | | | | Taxes on sales | (20,051) | (2,719) | (7,596) | Returns and rebates | (1) | (1) | (1,079) | Net operating revenue | 751,595 | 1,475,058 | 2,369,836 |
19.INFORMATION ON THE NATURE OF THE EXPENSES RECOGNIZED IN THE INCOME STATEMENT | | | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | | | | | Third-party material | (171,721) | (406,358) | (487,835) | Port handling | (77,643) | (219,429) | (255,767) | Railway freight | (83,339) | (168,863) | (221,459) | Freight and insurance | (70,252) | (202,926) | (159,531) | Raw material | - | (152,262) | (97,179) | Labor | (103,101) | (108,256) | (102,149) | Operating services | (40,105) | (76,820) | (48,360) | Maintenance | (48,640) | (51,376) | (62,535) | Demurrage | (2,773) | (11,069) | (22,246) | Infrastructure services | (31,972) | (17,927) | (25,189) | Depreciation/amortization | (39,436) | (45,806) | (21,341) | Other | (23,425) | (49,464) | (84,224) | | (692,407) | (1,510,556) | (1,587,815) | | | | | | Cost of goods sold | (479,861) | (995,192) | (1,090,901) | Selling expenses | (152,813) | (433,424) | (419,915) | General and administrative expenses | (34,180) | (54,029) | (55,966) | Other expenses, net | (25,553) | (27,911) | (21,033) | Total | (692,407) | (1,510,556) | (1,587,815) | | | | |
As mentioned in note 18, the decrease in costs in 2015 reflects the lower volume produced and sold. FS-28
20.FINANCIAL RESULTS | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | | | | | Interest expenses: | | | | Related parties | (7,254) | (23,809) | (21,915) | Interest and fines – REFIS | - | (1,234) | (344,786) | Tax on financial transactions(1) | (21,847) | (21) | (23) | Other interest expenses | (13,175) | (12,478 | (16,061) | | (42,076) | (37,542) | (382,785) | Interest income: | | | | Related parties | 1,349 | 1,052,240 | 1,044,132 | Dividends | 6,146 | 21,102 | 33,325 | Reversal of interest and fines - REFIS | - | 1,043 | 336,967 | Interest on short-term investments | 44,190 | 76,509 | 91,721 | Other finance income | 260 | 2,235 | 7,789 | | 51,945 | 1,153,129 | 1,513,934 | Financial income, net | 9,669 | 1,115,587 | 1,131,149 | | | | | Exchange rate differences: | | | | Gains: | | | | Related parties | 24,141 | 12,092 | 2,207 | Third parties(2) | 1,941,621 | 587,334 | 569,164 | Losses: | | | | Related parties | (104,847) | (62,504) | (46,091) | Third parties | (35,471) | (97) | (61) | Exchange rate gains, net | 1,825,444 | 536,825 | 525,219 | | | | | Monetary rate losses, net | (489) | (521) | (1,657) | Exchange and monetary gains (losses), net | 1,824,955 | 536,304 | 523,562 |
(1) Financial transaction tax (IOF) on remittance of dividends paid by subsidiary Namisa International. (2) Mainly exchange variation on short-term investments in US dollars ( time deposit ) 21.POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS – PRIVATE PENSION FUND PROGRAM The Company sponsors a pension plan created in 2012, managed by a private pension fund (CBSPREV Namisa), which grants to employees defined contribution plan and defined risk benefit plan (sickness allowance, disability retirement pensions, and survivors’ pensions), funded by the sponsor (50%) and by the employees (50%). FS-29
22.TAX RECOVERY PROGRAM (REFIS) On October 9, 2013, the federal government enacted Law 12,865/13, subsequently amended by Provisional Act 627, of December 11, 2013, which permitted companies to make the voluntary payment of IRPJ (corporate income tax) and CSLL (social contribution on net income) on profits generated by subsidiaries and/or foreign subsidiaries, as defined in Article 74 of Provisional Act 2,158-35/01, up to the year ended December 31, 2012. Such program permitted the payment of taxes in up to 180 installments, offering discounts of 100% on fines and interest for payments made in cash and of 80% on fines and 50% on interest for payments made in installments. The legislation also permitted the utilization of tax losses of subsidiaries and of direct or indirect parent company, for settlement of the amounts included in the program. In this regards, Company's management assessed its foreign operations, comparing them with several cases in the market that are being discussed at the administrative and judicial levels, and decided to include in the program the amounts related to profits earned by its foreign subsidiaries from 2009 to 2012. The amounts of IRPJ and CSLL resulting from the enrollment in the plan totaled R$892,649, with R$554,485 related to the years from 2009 to 2011 being paid in cash and R$87,828 related to the year 2012 being paid in 180 installments, plus fine and interest, with a down payment of 20% of the total amount, plus fine and interest calculated net of the reductions provided for in the program, totaling R$17,566. Furthermore, the amount of R$258,157 related to the tax loss acquired from the indirect controlling shareholder Vicunha S.A. was paid in cash. The balance payable as of November 30, 2015 totaledR$61,358 (R$60,139 as of December 31, 2014), to be settled in 156 installments, where those payable during the fiscal year immediately subsequent to the balance sheet date being classified in current liabilities and the others in noncurrent liabilities. The enrollment in the program resulted in the recognition of an income tax expense of R$995,383 in the year ended December 31, 2013. The accounting balance presented as non-current liabilities as of November 30, 2015 includes other taxes payables other than REFIS program and totalized R$75,665 (R$73,828 as of December 31, 2014). FS-30
23.FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS a)Identification and measurement of financial instruments The Company’s financial instruments consist of short-term investments, trade receivables, trade payables, and loans and financing. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments, such as currency swaps or interest swaps. The amounts are recognized in the financial statements at their amortized cost and are substantially similar to those that would be obtained if they were traded in the market. The fair values of other long-term assets and liabilities do not differ significantly from their carrying amounts. b)Classification of financial instruments | 2015 | 2014 | | Loans and receivables | Other liabilities at amortizedcost | Loans andreceivables | Other liabilities at amortizedcost | | | | | | Assets | | | | | Current: | | | | | Cash equivalents | 533,770 | - | 5,499,139 | - | Trade receivables | 721,059 | - | 126,726 | - | Advances to suppliers | 115,693 | - | 250,469 | - | Loans and receivables | 162,544 | - | 61,026 | - | | | | | | Noncurrent: | | | | | Advances to suppliers | 9,310,901 | - | 9,236,170 | - | Loans and receivables | - | - | - | - | | | | | | Liabilities | | | | | Current: | | | | | Loans and financing | - | 4,680 | - | 368,818 | Trade payables | - | 573,218 | - | 51,772 | Dividends | | 1,156,800 | | 55,764 | Advances from customers | - | - | - | 8,912 | | | | | | Noncurrent: | | | | | Loans and financing | - | 25,307 | - | 29,541 |
c)Financial risk management policy The Company has and follows a risk management policy, containing guidelines regarding the incurred risks. Pursuant to this policy, the nature and general position of financial risks are monitored and managed on a regular basis to assess the results and the financial impact on cash flow. The credit limits are also reviewed on a periodic basis. FS-31
The risk management policy was set by the Board of Directors. Under this policy, the market risks are hedged to maintain the corporate strategy or the financial flexibility level. d)Liquidity risk The liquidity risk is the risk that the Company may not have sufficient funds to honor its financial commitments as a result of mismatching of terms or volumes between expected amounts collectible and payable. To manage cash liquidity both in domestic and foreign currencies, future disbursements and cash inflow assumptions are established and daily monitored by the treasury department. The table below shows the contractual maturities of financial assets and liabilities, including the payment estimate: As of December 31, 2015 | | | | | Loans and financing | 4,680 | 9,237 | 15,715 | 355 | Trade payables | 573,218 | - | - | - |
| | | | | As of December 31, 2014 | | | | | Loans and financing | 368,818 | 9,237 | 18,429 | 1,875 | Trade payables | 51,773 | - | - | - |
e)Foreign exchange risk The Company assesses its foreign exchange exposure by deducting its liabilities from its US dollar-denominated assets to obtain its net foreign exchange exposure, which is actually the foreign exchange exposure risk, and also takes into consideration the maturity of the related assets and liabilities subject to exchange fluctuation. Basically, the Company’s financial instruments exposed to foreign exchange risk originate from exports and the investments abroad. The consolidated net exposure as of November 30, 2015 is as follows: | 2015 | | | | | Cash and cash equivalents abroad | 99,205 | Trade receivables | 138,690 | Receivables from related parties | 36,437 | Total assets | 274,332 | | | Borrowings and financing | - | Trade payables | 184,409 | Taxes payables | 81,031 | Other liabilities | 18,877 | Total liabilities | 284,317 | Foreign exchange exposure, net | (9,985) | | |
FS-32
Gains and losses on these transactions are consistent with the policies and strategies set by Management. ·Sensitivity analysis We estimated the adjustments in four scenarios for the consolidated foreign exchange transactions exposed to US dollar fluctuation, using the exchange rate at November 30, 2015 of R$3.8506 per US$1.00, as follows: Scenario 1: (50% real depreciation) R$/US$ parity of 5.7759. Scenario 2: (25% real depreciation) R$/US$ parity of 4.8133. Scenario 3: (25% real appreciation) R$/US$ parity of 2.8880. Scenario 4: (50% real appreciation) R$/US$ parity of 1.9253. | | | | | Impacts estimated in Brazilian Reais | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Exchange rate | | 3.8506 | 5.7759 | 4.8133 | 2.8880 | 1.9253 | | | | | | | | Assets: | | | | | | | Cash and cash equivalents | US dollar fluctuation | 99,205 | 190,999 | 95,500 | (95,500) | (190,999) | Trade receivables | US dollar fluctuation | 138,690 | 267,020 | 133,510 | (133,510) | (267,020) | Receivables from related parties | US dollar fluctuation | 36,437 | 70,152 | 35,076 | (35,076) | (70,152) | | | 274,332 | 528,171 | 264,086 | (264,086) | (528,171) | Liabilities: | | | | | | | Loans and financing | US dollar fluctuation | - | - | - | - | - | Trade payables | US dollar fluctuation | 184,408 | 355,041 | 177,520 | (177,520) | (355,041) | Taxes payables | US dollar fluctuation | 81,031 | 156,009 | 78,005 | (78,005) | (156,009) | Advances from customers | US dollar fluctuation | - | - | - | - | - | Other liabilities | US dollar fluctuation | 18,877 | 36,344 | 18,172 | (18,172 | (36,344) | | | 284,316 | 547,394 | 273,697 | (273,697) | (547,394) | Net effect | | (9,984) | (19,223) | (9,611) | 9,611 | 19,223 | | | | | | | |
f)Interest rate risk The Company did not identify any material floating interest rate and inflation index risk to its long-term liabilities. FS-33
g)Credit risks The exposure to the credit risks of financial institutions follows the parameters set out in the financial policy. The Company adopts the procedure of analyzing in detail the financial position of its customers and suppliers, defining a credit limit and constantly monitoring its outstanding balance. By analyzing the geographical distribution of the exports, we can see a strong concentration of sales in Asia. This is due to the fact that China maintains a strong demand for iron ore and the fact that the shareholders are major steel mills located in Japan and Korea, with which the Company has long-term agreements. Carrying out most of the sales against the presentation of credit letters and based on customer assessments, as well as the diversification of receivables and the control over sales financing are the usual procedures that the Company adopts to minimize possible credit risks of its business partners. On November 30, 2015, sales to customers that individually account for more than 10% of sales revenue totaled 64%. As for short-term investments, the Company only makes investments in institutions with low credit risk awarded by rating agencies. h)Capital management The Company manages its capital structure for the purpose of safeguarding its ability to continue as a going concern, in order to provide returns for shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders, while maintaining an optimal capital structure to reduce this cost. 24.INSURANCE Due to the nature of its operations, the Company renewed with a local insurer, for the period from September 30, 2015 to September 30, 2016, the coverage of named perils for the following locations: (a) mine, BR 040, km 602, Ouro Preto, MG; (b) mine, Inconfidentes Highway, km 40, no number, Itabirito, MG; (c) office, Rua Iguatemi, 192, 25º andar, Itaim, SP, with coverage of property damages against fire/lightening/any type of explosion, and loss of profits resulting from fire/lightening/any type of explosion, in the total risk amount of R$728,691 (property damages and loss of profits), and indemnity ceilings, in case of accidents, of R$50,000 (fire), and R$122,000 (loss of profits). The risk assumptions adopted, in view of their nature, are not part of the scope of an audit of the financial statements and, therefore, were not audited by our independent auditors. FS-34
25.ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO CASH FLOWS In 2015, the Company incorporated the subsidiary CSN Handel GmbH and realized the partial split of Fernandinho, Cayman and Pedras Pretas assets into Mineração Nacional S.A. Part of the net assets, shown in the following table, is not included in the statement of cash flows: | Fernandinho, Cayman and Pedras Pretas assets | CSN Handel GmbH | | Nov 30, 2015 | Nov 30, 2015 | Cash and cash equivalents | - | 77.583 | Trade receivables | - | 467.842 | Inventories | 23.586 | | Recoverable taxes | 109 | 15.038 | Loan and receivables | - | 139.584 | Deferred taxes | 1.364 | - | Non-current recoverable taxes | 5.111 | - | Property, plant and equipament | 39.285 | - | Suppliers | (201) | (548.396) | Taxes payable | - | (15.033) | Asset retirement obligation | (8.694) | - | Other payables | - | (64.898) | Net assets | 60.560 | 71.720 |
In addition, the Company acquired in 2015 some trucks with recoverable tax (ICMS credits) in the amount of R$7,154. 26.APPROVAL OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS These consolidated financial statements were authorized for issuance on April 28, 2016. FS-35
|
|