As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 29, 2006May 7, 2008

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549FORM 20-F


FORM 20-F


REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005

OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007

OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


Commission File Number: 001-15248


VEOLIA ENVIRONNEMENT

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

N/A
(Translation of Registrant’s
name into English)

36/38, avenue Kléber,
75116 Paris,
France

Republic of France
(Jurisdiction of incorporation
or organization)

(Address of principal executive offices)

Alain Tchernonog, General Secretary, 36/38 avenue Kléber, 75116 Paris France  011 33 1 71 75 00 54

(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of each class

Name of each exchange on which registered

————

————

Ordinary shares, nominal value €5 per share represented by American Depositary Shares
(as evidenced by American Depositary Receipts),
each American Depositary Share representing one ordinary share*

The New York Stock Exchange


Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
None

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:

407,872,606470,719,806 ordinary shares, nominal value €5 per share

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act:

Yes  No


No

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:

Yes No


No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:

Yes

No

Yes No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer


Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

IndicateU.S. GAAP International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board Other  

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow:follow.

Item 17

Item 18  


If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):

Yes

No


*Listed, not for trading or quotation purposes, but only in connection with the registration of the American Depositary Shares pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission.







Back to contentsContents


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

We make some forward-looking statements in this document. When we use the words “aim(s),” “expect(s),” “feel(s),” “will,” “may,” “believe(s),” “anticipate(s)” and similar expressions in this document, we are intending to identify those statements as forward-looking.  Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this document. In particular, from time to time in this document we state our expectations in terms of revenue to be generated under new contracts recently won or awarded or from new investments made and new assets or operations acquired, though we may have not yet commenced operations under these new contracts nor begun operating these new assets and operations at the time we make these statements. Some of these revenue estimates are based on our management’s current assumptions regarding future sales volumes and prices, which are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that may cause actual sales volumes and prices to differ materially from those projected. As a result, actual revenue recorded under these new contracts or from these new investments, assets and operations may differ materially from those set forth in this document. Other than in connection with applicable securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publish revised forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this document or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. We urge you to carefully review and consider the various disclosures we make concerning the factors that may affect our business, including the disclosures made in “Item 3. Key Information—Information — Risk Factors,” “Item 5. Oper atingOp erating and Financial Review and Prospects,” and “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”

Unless otherwise indicated, information and statistics presented herein regarding market trends and our market share relative to our competitors are based on our own research and various publicly available sources.




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | i



Back to contentsContents


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers

1

Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable

1

Item 3. Key Information

1

Item 4. Information on the Company

6

Item 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments

33

Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

33

Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees

47

Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions

64

Item 8. Financial Information

65

Item 9. The Offer and Listing

68

Item 10. Additional Information

70

Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

77

Item 12. Description of Securities Other Than Equity Securities

80

Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies

81

Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds

81

Item 15. Controls and Procedures

81

Item 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert

81

Item 16B. Code of Ethics

81

Item 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

81

Item 16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees

82

Item 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

82

Item 17. Financial Statements

83

Item 18. Financial Statements

83

Item 19. Exhibits

83

1

Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable

1

Item 3. Key Information

1

Item 4. Information on the Company

10

Item 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments

65

Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

66

Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees

100

Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions

136

Item 8. Financial Information

139

Item 9. The Offer and Listing

145

Item 10. Additional Information

148

Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

163

Item 12. Description of Securities Other Than Equity Securities

163

Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies

164

Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds

164

Item 15. Controls and Procedures

164

Item 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert

165

Item 16B. Code of Ethics

165

Item 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

165

Item 16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees

166

Item 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

166

Item 17. Financial Statements

167

Item 18. Financial Statements

167

Item 19. Exhibits

167





VEOLIA - Form 20-F | ii



Back to contentsContents


PART I

ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

Not Applicable.

ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

Not Applicable.

ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

You should read the following selected financial data together with “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and our consolidated financial statements. Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) adopted by the European Union as of December 31, 2005 and with IFRS issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) and as ofadopted by the same date.European Union.  We did not publish financial data in accordance with IFRS differ in certain significant respects from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”).  For a description of2003, because at the principal differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP as they relate to us and totime our consolidated subsidiaries, and for a reconciliation of our shareholders’ equity and net income to U.S. GAAP, see Note 50 to our consolidated financial statements includedwere required to be presented in Item 18 ofconformity with French Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. For this annua l report.reason, we have not provided selected financial data for 2003.  See also “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” for a discussion of accounting changes, business combinations and dispositions of business operations that affect the comparabilitycomp arability of the information provided below.

The U.S. GAAP figures for 2004 set forth below have been restated to take into account the new reporting unit definitions that we applied for 2005. See Note 50A to our consolidated financial statements, under the heading “Impairment of Goodwill” for further information.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 1



Back to contentsContents



At and for the year ended December 31,

At and for the year ended December 31,

     

(in US$)(1)

 

(in €)

  

(in US$)(1)

 

(in €)

 

————

————

————

————

————

————

————

————

————

————

(millions, except per share amounts)

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2007

2006

2005

2004

————

————

————

————

————

————

————

————

INCOME STATEMENT DATA:

        

Amounts in accordance with IFRS

    

Revenue

29,780.5

25,244.9

22,500.3

--

--

--

48,032.1

32,628.2

28,620.4

25,570.4

22,792.4

Operating income

2,233.0

1,892.9

1,480.6

--

--

--

3,675.7

2,496.9

2,132.9

1,892.9

1,489.6

Net income from continuing operations

946.1

802.0

634.7

--

--

--

1,881.3

1,278.0

994.3

794.4

640.0

Net income (expense) from discontinued operations

--

(105.7)

--

--

--

(34.2)

(23.2)

0.6

0.7

(38.1)

Minority interest

(211.2)

(179.0)

(137.5)

--

--

--

481.2

326.9

236.2

172.9

212.1

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent

734.9

623.0

391.5

--

--

--

1,366.0

927.9

758.7

622.2

389.8

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent per share—Basic(2)

1.89

1.60

0.99

--

--

--

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent per share—Diluted(3)

1.88

1.59

0.99

--

--

--

Net income from continuing operations per share—Basic(2)

2.42

2.05

1.60

--

--

--

Net income from continuing operations per share—Diluted(3)

2.41

2.04

1.60

--

--

--

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent per share — Basic(2)

3.18

2.16

1.90

1.57

0.97

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent per share — Diluted(3)

3.14

2.13

1.89

1.56

0.97

Group net income from continuing operations per share — Basic(2)

3.25

2.21

1.90

1.57

1.26

Group net income from continuing operations per share — Diluted(3)

3.22

2.19

1.88

1.56

1.26

Dividends per share

1.00

0.85

0.68

--

--

--

1.78

1.21(4)

1.05

0,85

0,68

Number of shares (adjusted to reflect changes in capital)

407,872,606

406,421,983

--

--

--

471,762,756

412,626,550(5)

407,872,606

406,421,983

        

Amounts in accordance with U.S. GAAP

    

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent

655.5

555.7

145.2(4)

(1,826.9)

(1,988.8)

180.3

Basic earnings per share

1.68

1.42

0.37(4)

(4.56)

(5.45)

0.52

Diluted earnings per share

1.68

1.42

0.37(4)

(4.56)

(5.45)

0.52

    

BALANCE SHEET DATA (AT PERIOD END):

        

Amounts in accordance with IFRS

    

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

4,485.8

3,802.6

3,222.8

--

--

--

11,207.0

7,612.9

4,360.8

3,790.2

3,211.2

Minority interest

2,230.6

1,890.9

1,725.5

--

--

--

3,794.8

2,577.8

2,192.6

1,888.0

1,728.7

Total assets

42,832.8

36,309.4

35,825.9

--

--

--

68,168.6

46,306.9

40,123.7

36,381.0

35,899.3

Total non-current assets

26,858.3

22,767.8

20,656.6

--

--

--

42,647.4

28,970.4

25,100.0

22,834.9

20,733.3

Total non-current liabilities

19,845.2

16,822.8

14,727.9

--

--

--

26,564.7

18,045.4

18,056.3

16,934.0

14,836.4

        

Amounts in accordance with U.S. GAAP

    

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

3,341.9

2,832.9

2,255.5

2,378.1

4,923.2

6,780.7

    

CASH FLOW DATA:

        

Amounts in accordance with IFRS

    

Net cash flow from operating activities

3,888.5

3,296.3

3,517.0(4)

--

--

--

5,350.5

3,634.6

3,389.6

3,163.7

3,384.3

Net cash from (used in) investing activities

(2,996.6)

(2,540.2)

174.6(4)

--

--

--

(5,915.5)

(4,018.4)

(2,904.0)

(2,407.6)

318.9

Net cash used in financing activities

(3,719.2)

(3,152.8)

(1,795.5) (4)

--

--

--

Net cash from (used in) financing activities

1,385.0

940.8

(71.5)

(3,152.8)

(1,795.5)

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

(2,455.9)

(2,081.9)

(1,964.0) (4)

--

--

--

(3,707.8)

(2,518.7)

(2,017.6)

(1,837.1)

(1,723.0)

    

(1)

For your convenience, we have converted the euro amounts of our selected financial data into U.S. dollars using the December 31, 2007 rate of $1.00 = €0.6793. This does not mean that we actually converted, or could have converted, those amounts into U.S. dollars on this or any other date.

(2)

Based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding in each period for the calculation of basic earnings per share, equal to 430.0 million shares in 2007, 398.8 million shares in 2006, 395.6 million shares in 2005 and 401.5 million shares in 2004. Following the share capital increase in July 2007, the calculation of basic diluted earnings per share was adjusted retrospectively for all periods presented.

(3)

Based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding in each period for the calculation of diluted earnings per share, equal to 435.0 million shares in 2007, 402.4 million shares in 2006, 397,6 million shares in 2005 and 401.6 million shares in 2004. Following the share capital increase in July 2007, the calculation of diluted earnings per share was adjusted retrospectively for all periods presented.

(4)

Amount of dividend distribution per share to be proposed to the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting of May 7, 2008.

(5)

The number of shares as of December 31, 2006 mentioned above includes the exercise of options to subscribe for shares of our company which occurred from July 1 to December 31, 2006. The share capital increase and the creation of shares resulting from such exercise of stock options were formally recorded by our board of directors on March 7, 2007.

(1)

For your convenience, we have converted the euro amounts of our selected financial data into U.S. dollars using the December 31, 2007 rate of $1.00 = €0.6793. This does not mean that we actually converted, or could have converted, those amounts into U.S. dollars on this or any other date.

(2)

Based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding in each period for the calculation of basic earnings per share, equal to 430.0 million shares in 2007, 398.8 million shares in 2006, 395.6 million shares in 2005 and 401.5 million shares in 2004. Following the share capital increase in July 2007, the calculation of basic diluted earnings per share was adjusted retrospectively for all periods presented.

(3)

Based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding in each period for the calculation of diluted earnings per share, equal to 435.0 million shares in 2007, 402.4 million shares in 2006, 397,6 million shares in 2005 and 401.6 million shares in 2004. Following the share capital increase in July 2007, the calculation of diluted earnings per share was adjusted retrospectively for all periods presented.

(4)

Amount of dividend distribution per share to be proposed to the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting of May 7, 2008.

(5)

The number of shares as of December 31, 2006 mentioned above includes the exercise of options to subscribe for shares of our company which occurred from July 1 to December 31, 2006. The share capital increase and the creation of shares resulting from such exercise of stock options were formally recorded by our board of directors on March 7, 2007.

(1)

For your convenience, we have converted the euro amounts of our selected financial data into U.S. dollars using the December 31, 2005 rate of$1.00 = €0.8477. This does not mean that we actually converted, or could have converted, those amounts into U.S. dollars on this or any other date.

(2)

Based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding in each period for the calculation of basic earnings per share, equal to 390.4 million shares in 2005 and 396.2 million shares in 2004.

(3)

Based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding in each period for the calculation of diluted earnings per share, equal to 392.4 million shares in 2005 and 396.3 million shares in 2004.

(4)

As restated – see Note 50D to our consolidated financial statements.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 2



Back to contentsContents


Dividends

Under French law and our articles of association (statuts), our statutory net income in each fiscal year, as increased or reduced, as the case may be, by any profits or losses carried forward from prior years, less any contributions to legal reserves, is available for distribution to our shareholders as dividends, subject to other applicable requirements of French law and ourstatuts.

At our general shareholders’ meeting on May 11, 2006,7, 2008, our shareholders approvedwill decide on a dividend payment proposed to be €1.21 per share in respect of our 2007 fiscal year, which shall be paid on May 27, 2008. On May 15, 2007, we paid a dividend of €1.05 per share in respect of the 2006 fiscal year.  On May 29, 2006, we paid a dividend of €0.85 per share in respect of ourthe 2005 fiscal year, which was paid on May 29, 2006.year.  On May 27, 2005, we paid a dividend of €0.68 per share in respect of the 2004 fiscal year. On May 28, 2004, we paid a dividend of €0.55 per share in respect of the 2003 fiscal year. On May 7, 2003, we paid a dividend of €0.55 per share in respect of the 2002 fiscal year. On May 6, 2002, we paid a dividend of €0.55 per share in respect of the 2001 fiscal year.  

Dividends paid to holders of our ADSs and non-French resident holders of our shares normally are subject to a 25% French withholding tax.  However, non-resident holders that are entitled to and comply with the procedures for claiming benefits under an applicable tax treaty may be subject to a reduced rate of withholding tax (15% for holders who are residents of the United States) and be entitled to certain benefits. See “Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation” for a summary of the material U.S. federal and French tax consequences to holders of shares and ADSs.  Holders of shares or ADSs should consult their own tax advisers with respect to the tax consequences of an investment in the shares or ADSs.  In addition, dividends paid to holders of ADSs will be subject to a charge by the depositary for any expenses incurred by the depositary of the ADSs in the conversion of eur o to dollars.

Exchange Rate Information

Share capital in our company is represented by ordinary shares with a nominal value of €5 per share (generally referred to as “our shares”). Our shares are denominated in euro. Because we intend to pay cash dividends denominated in euro, exchange rate fluctuations will affect the U.S. dollar amounts that shareholders will receive on conversion of dividends from euro to dollars.

The following table shows the euro/U.S. dollar exchange rate from 20012003 through May 2006April 2008 based on the noon buying rate expressed in U.S. dollars per euro. The information concerning the U.S. dollar exchange rate is based on the noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in foreign currencies as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the “Noon Buying Rate”). We provide the exchange rates below solely for your convenience. We do not represent that euros were, could have been, or could be, converted into U.S. dollars at these rates or at any other rate. For information regarding the effect of currency fluctuations on our results of operations, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.”

Month

Period

Average

  

Period

Average

  

U.S. dollar/Euro

End

rate*

High

Low

End

rate*

High

Low

————

————

————

————

————

————

May 2006

1.28

1.29

1.26

April 2006

1.26

1.23

1.26

1.21

March 2006

1.21

1.20

1.22

1.19

February 2006

1.19

1.21

1.19

January 2006

1.22

1.21

1.23

1.20

December 2005

1.18

1.20

1.17

April 2008

1.56

1.57

1.60

1.56

March 2008

1.58

1.55

1.58

1.52

February 2008

1.52

1.48

1.52

1.45

January 2008

1.49

1.47

1.49

1.46

December 2007

1.47

1.46

1.48

1.43

November 2007

1.48

1.47

1.49

1.44

      

Year

      

U.S. dollar/Euro

      
      

2007

1.47

1.38

1.49

1.29

2006

1.32

1.26

1.33

1.19

2005

1.18

1.24

1.35

1.17

1.18

1.24

1.35

1.17

2004

1.35

1.24

1.36

1.18

1.36

1.25

1.36

1.18

2003

1.26

1.13

1.26

1.04

1.26

1.13

1.26

1.04

2002

1.05

0.95

1.05

0.86

2001

0.89

0.95

0.84

*

The average of the Noon Buying Rates on the last business day of each month (or portion thereof) during the relevant period for year average; on each business day of the month (or portion thereof) for monthly average.

*

The average of the Noon Buying Rates on the last business day of each month (or portion thereof) during the relevant period for year average; on each business day of the month (or portion thereof) for monthly average.

*

The average of the Noon Buying Rates on the last business day of each month (or portion thereof) during the relevant period for year average; on each business day of the month (or portion thereof) for monthly average.




3



Back to Contents



Solely for the convenience of the reader, this annual report contains translations of certain euro amounts into U.S. dollars. These translations should not be construed as representations that the converted amounts actually represent such U.S. dollar amounts or could have been or will be converted into U.S. dollars at the rate indicated or at all. The translations from euro to U.S. dollars in this annual report are based on $1.00 = €0.8477,€0.6793, the Noon Buying Rate on December 31, 2005.2007. On June 23, 2006,May 6, 2008, the Noon Buying Rate was U.S.$1.25 1.55 per euro.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 34



Back to contentsContents


RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider the risk factors described below in addition to the other information presented in this document.

Risks Relating to Our Operations

We may suffer reduced profits or losses as a result of intense competition.

Our business is highly competitive and requires substantial human and capital resources. Large international competitors and local niche companies serve each of the markets in which we compete.  Accordingly, we must make constant efforts to remain competitive and convince potential clients of the quality and cost value of our service offerings. Competitors may also introduce new technology or services that we would have to match in order to remain competitive, which could result in significant development costs for us.costs.  

In addition, we perform a substantial portion of our business under contracts, often of a long-term nature, with governmental authorities and clients from the industrial and commercial service sectors. These contracts are often awarded through competitive bidding, at the end of which we may not be retained even though we may have incurred significant expenses in order to prepare the bid.

Over the course of performing certain contracts, we may also be requested by our public or private clients to modify the terms of these contracts, whether called for under the contract or not. These modifications may alter the services provided under the contract, related expensesinvestments required or billing terms.

Finally, our contracts may not be renewed at the end of their term, which in the case of important contracts may oblige us to engage inundertake a costly reorganization or restructuring of assets and operations covered by the contract when the contract does not provide for the transfer of the related assets and employees to the succeeding operator and/or adequate indemnification to cover our costs of termination.

Our business operations in some countries may be subject to additional risks.

While our operations are concentrated mainly in Europe and North America (sales generated outside of these regions represented approximately 12% of our total revenue in 2007), we conduct business in markets around the world. Sales generated in countries outside of Europe and North America represented approximately 9.7% of our total revenue in 2005. The risks associated with conducting business in some countries outside of Europe, the United States and Canada can include slower payment of invoices, which is sometimes aggravated by the absence of legal recourse for non-payment, nationalization, social, political and economic instability, increased currency exchange risk and currency repatriation restrictions, among other risks. We may not be able to insure or hedge against these risks. Furthermore, we may not be able to obtain sufficient financing for our operations in these countries. The establishment of public utility fees and their structure can be highly political, slowing and impeding for several years any increase in feesfee s that no longer allow coverage of service costs and appropriate compensation for a private operator. The occurrence of unfavorable events or circumstances in certain countries may lead us to record exceptional provisions or depreciation charges in connection with our operations in these countries, which could have a material adverse effect on our results.

Changes in the prices of fuel and other commodities may reduce our profits.

The prices of our supplies of fuel and other commodities, which arerepresent significant operating expenses for our businesses, are subject to sudden increases. Although most of our contracts contain tariff adjustment provisions that are intended to reflect possible variations in prices of our supplies using certain pricing formulas, such as our price index formulas, there may be developments that could prevent us from being fully protected against such increases, such as delays between fuel price increases and the time we are allowed to raise our prices to cover the additional costs (including taxes), or our failure to update an outdated cost structure formula.  In addition, a sustained increase in supply costs and/or related taxes beyond the price levels provided for under our adjustment clauses could reduce our profitability to the extent that we are not able to increase our prices sufficiently to cover thesuch additional costs.



5



Back to Contents


We have conducted and may continue to conduct acquisitions, which could have a less favorable impact on our activities and results than anticipated, or which could affect our financial situation.

As part of our business strategy, we have conducted and continue to carry out acquisitions of varying sizes, some of which are significant at the Group level.  These acquisitions involve numerous risks, including the following: (i) the assumptions used in the underlying business plans may not prove to be accurate, in particular with respect to synergies and expected commercial demand; (ii) we may not integrate acquired businesses, technologies, products, personnel and operations effectively; (iii) we may fail to retain key employees, customers and suppliers of the companies acquired; (iv) we may be required or wish to terminate pre-existing contractual relationships, which could be costly and/or on unfavorable terms; and (v) we may increase our indebtedness to finance these acquisitions. As a result, it is possible that the expected benefits of completed or future acquisitions may not materialize wi thin the time periods or to the extent anticipated, or that such acquisitions may affect our financial condition.

Our business is affected by variations in weather conditions.

Certain of our businesses are subject to seasonal variations. Dalkia realizes the bulk of its operating results in the first and fourth quarters of the year, corresponding to periods in which heating is used in Europe.  In the water sector, household water consumption tends to be higher between May and September in the northern hemisphere.  Accordingly, these two businesses may be affected by significant deviations from seasonal weather norms. This risk is offset in certain cases, both by variable compensation terms in contracts, and by the geographical distribution of our businesses. The impact of weather conditions, together with the seasonal nature of our businesses, may affect our results.

Our business operations are subject to geopolitical, criminal and terrorist risks.

Water is a strategic resource in terms of public health. Accordingly, our activities must comply with laws and regulations that seek to safeguard water resources, production sites and treatment facilities against criminal or terrorist acts. Our activities in the areas of waste management, energy services and public transportation are also subject to similar risks.  We may also have employees who work or travel in areas where the risk of criminal acts, kidnapping or terrorism is either temporarily or permanently elevated. As a result, despite the safety measures that we have attempted to implement, any one of our activities may fall victim to criminal or terrorist acts in the future.

Our long-term contracts may limit our capacity to quickly and effectively react to general economic changes affecting our performance under those contracts.

The general circumstances or conditions under which we enter into a contract may change over the term of the contract, particularly in the case of long-term contracts.  For example, changes in the prices of our supplies may increase beyond levels that were foreseen or foreseeable at the time the contract was entered into or changes in end user behavior may significantly affect our financial performance under the contract.  Because our contracts generally do not allow us to unilaterally terminate them or interrupt or suspend the performance of our obligations under them, we attempt to foresee these possible changes at the time we negotiate our contracts and typically include adjustment mechanisms in our contracts (such as price index clauses or the right to initiate a review or modification process).  However, we may not always be able to foresee all potential changes or to negotiate adju stment clauses that cover all possible scenarios.  In addition, even if our contracts include these types of adjustment clauses, our ability to react to these changes is limited to the adjustments permitted by these clauses.  For example, our long-term contracts typically provide for pre-determined fees or payments for our services (either from the client or from the end user according to a set price list), and we cannot adjust these fees or prices to reflect anticipated shifts in costs or product demand other than in accordance with the terms of the adjustment clause.  Also, our right to initiate a review or modification process in respect of a contract may be subject to conditions, including the consent of the other parties to the contract or of a third party (such as a public authority).  As a result, we may be required to continue performing our obligations under our contracts even if the general conditions or circumstances of our performance are different from those that had been for eseen and provided for at the time the contract was signed, which in some cases may alter the financial equilibrium of the contract and adversely affect our financial performance under the contract.

The rights of governmental authorities to terminate or modify our contracts unilaterally could have a negative impact on our revenue and profits.

Contracts with governmental authorities make up a significant percentage of our revenue. In numerous countries, including France, governmental authorities may modify or terminate contracts under certain circumstances, unilaterally but generally with indemnification.  In other countries, however, we may not be entitled to or be able to obtain full indemnification in the event our contracts are terminated by governmental counterparties.  



6



Back to Contents


We may make significant investments in projects without being able to obtain the required approvals for the project.

To engage in business, we must in most cases obtain a contract and sometimes obtain, or renew, various permits and authorizations from regulatory authorities. The competition and/or negotiation process that must be followed in order to obtain such contracts is often long, costly, complex and hard to predict.  The same applies to the authorization process for activities that may harm the environment which are often preceded by increasingly complex studies and public investigations.  We may invest significant resources in a project or public tender without obtaining the right to engage in the desired business nor sufficient compensation or indemnities to cover the cost of our investments.  These situations increase the overall cost of our activities and, if we do not obtain the desired business or are forced to withdraw from a public tender, our business may not grow as much or as profitablyprofitab ly as we hope.

We must comply with various environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, which is costly and may, in the event of any failure to comply on our part, cause us to incur liability under these laws and regulations.

We incur significant costs of compliance with various environmental, health and safety laws and regulations.

We have made and will continue to make significant capital and other expenditures to comply with our environmental, health and safety obligations. We are continuously required to incur expenditures to ensure that the installations that we operate comply with applicable legal, regulatory and administrative requirements, including general precautionary or preventative measures, or to advise our clients so that they undertake the necessary actions for the compliance of their installations. The costs related to these preventative measures are recorded as either operating expenses or as industrial investments. Our industrial investments in all areas totaled €2.1€2.642 billion in 2005.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 4



Back to contents


2007.

Each of our operations, moreover, may become subject to stricter general or particularspecific laws and regulations, and correspondingly greater compliance expenditures, in the future. If we are unable to recover these expenditures through higher tariffs, this could adversely affect our operations and profitability. Moreover, the scope of application of environmental, health, safety and other laws and regulations is becoming increasingly broad.  These laws and regulations govern, among other things, any discharge in a natural environment, the collection, transport, treatment and disposal of all types of waste, and the rehabilitation of old sites.sites at the end of operations, as well as ongoing operations at new or old facilities.

Our failure to comply with any applicable environmental, healthoperations and safety laws and regulationsactivities may cause us to incur liability or other damages that we might be required to compensate.

TheseThe increasingly broad laws and regulations under which we operate expose us to thegreater risk of liability, in particular environmental liability, including in connection with assets that we no longer own and activities that have been discontinued. For example, a French law dated July 30, 2003, relating to the prevention of technological and environmental risks and the conduct of remediation activities, has strengthened the regulatory framework that applies to discontinued operations and closed sites and installations. In somecertain instances, it requires reserves mustto be established in respect of such discontinued operations. In addition, we may be required to pay fines, repair damage or undertake improvement works, even when we have conducted our activities with care and in total conformity with operating permits. Regulatory authorities may also require us to conduct investigations and undertake remedial activities,a ctivities, curtail operations or close facilities temporarily in connection w ithwith applicable laws and regulations, including to prevent imminent risksdamage or in light of expected changes in those laws and regulations.

In addition, we often operate installations that do not belong to us, and therefore do not always have the power to make the investment decisions required to bring these installations into compliance with new regulatory norms. In instances where the client on whose behalf these installations are operated refuses to make the required investments, we may be forced to terminate our operating contracts.

In the event of an accident or other incident, we could also become subject to claims for personal injury, property damage or damage to the environment (including natural resources). These potential liabilities may not always be covered by insurance, or may be only partially covered.  The obligation to compensate for such damages might have a material adverse effect on our activities or resources.



7



Back to Contents


Specific measures are required in connection with certain technological risks (article L. 225-102-2risks.

As part of our outsourcing contracts, our subsidiaries may be involved in the operation of top-tier “Seveso” sites (AS classification under ICPE (Installations Classified for the Protection of the French Commercial Code regardingEnvironment) nomenclature) or lower-tier “Seveso” facilities)sites (or their foreign equivalent) for industrial clients (particularly petroleum or chemical industry sites).

Among the facilities that we own and operate in France, one has been categorized a “Seveso” facility.  “Seveso” facilities are places where dangerous substances are present in quantities equal to or above thresholds specified in European Union Directive 96/82/EC (also known as the Seveso II Directive), relating to the control of major accident hazards involving dangerous substances.  As such, these facilities are the subject of special concern and heightened regulation. Our “Seveso” facility is a hazardous waste incineration factory at Limay (Yvelines). The manipulation of waste and hazardous products in this facility can, in the case of an accident, cause serious damage to the environment, neighbors or employees, exposing us to potentially substantial liabilities.

As part of our outsourcing contracts, our subsidiaries may also be involved in the operation of Seveso sites (or the foreign equivalent) by industrial clients (particularly petroleum or chemical industry sites).  In these instances, we must handle the provision of services with even greater care, given the more dangerous nature of the products, waste, effluents and emissions to be treated, as well as the close proximity of the installations we manage to client sites.

Finally, whileWhile the regulatory regime governing Seveso facilities applies only within the European Union, we operate several similar sites outside of this region. These sites are often subject to the same level of heightened regulation by foreign governments, exposing us to potentially substantial liabilities in the event of accident.

Among the facilities that we own and operate in France, one has been categorized a lower-tier “Seveso” facility (not classified as AS under ICPE nomenclature).  It is a hazardous waste incineration facility operated by SARP Industries (Veolia Propreté) at Limay (Yvelines). The manipulation of waste and hazardous products in this facility can, in the case of an accident, cause serious damage to the environment, neighbors or employees, exposing us to potentially substantial liabilities.

Currency exchange and interest rate fluctuations may negatively affect our financial results and the price of our shares.

We hold assets, earn income and incur expenses and liabilities directly and through our subsidiaries in a variety of currencies. Our financial statements are presented in euro. Therefore, when we prepare our financial statements, we must translate our assets, liabilities, income and expenses in other currencies into euro at then-applicable exchange rates. Consequently, increases and decreases in the value of the euro in respect of these other currencies will affect the value of these items in our financial statements, even if their value has not changed in their original currency. For example, an increase in the value of the euro may result in a decline in the reported value, in euro, of our interests held in foreign currencies.

At December 31, 2005,2007, our net financial debt excluding revaluation of hedging instruments amounted to €13.9€15.1 billion, of which 26.1%26% was subject to variable rates 8.7%and 74% to fixed interest rates, including 9% subject to variable rates with caps (euro-denominated debt capped at a 3.5% interest rate) and 65.2% to fixed interest rates. Because we have a significant amount of debt outstanding, ourcaps.  Our results of operations and financial condition may be affected by changes in prevailing market rates of interest.  Fluctuations in interest rates may also affect our future growth and investment strategy. Astrategy, since a rise in interest rates may force us to finance acquisitions or investments or refinance existing debt at a higher cost in the future, which may lead us to decide to curtail or delay our then current expansion plans.future.

Risks Relating to Our Shares and ADSs

Because preemptive rights may not be available for U.S. persons, the ownership percentages of our U.S. shareholders may be diluted in the event of a capital increase of our company.

Under French law, shareholders have preemptive rights (droits préférentiels de souscription) to subscribe, on a pro rata basis, for cash issuances of new shares or other securities giving rights to acquire additional shares. U.S.  holders of our shares may not be able to exercise preemptive rights for our shares unless a registration statement under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Securities Act”), is effective with respect to those rights or an exemption from the registration requirements imposed by the Securities Act is available.  We are not required to file registration statements in connection with issues of new shares or other securities giving rights to acquire shares to our shareholders.  As a result, we may from time to time issue new shares or other securities giving rights to acquire additional shares at a time when no registration stat ement is in effect.  For example, in July 20022007 we effected a capital increase through the issuance of rights to acquire new shares to all of our shareholders, but those rights were generally exercisable only by persons located outside the United States.  Holders of our ADSs were not permitted to exercise the rights corresponding to the shares underlying the ADSs and received the net proceeds of the sale of these rights in the French market by the ADS depositary.



8



Back to Contents


We are permitted to file less information with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) than a company incorporated in the United States.

As a “foreign private issuer,” we are exempt from rules under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), that impose some disclosure and procedural requirements for proxy solicitations under Section 14 of the Exchange Act. Additionally, our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and “short-swing” profit recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and related rules with respect to their purchases and sales of our shares. Moreover, we are not required to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as U.S. companies with securities registered under the Exchange Act. Accordingly, there may be less information concerning our company publicly available from time to time than there is for U.S. companies at those times.

The ability of holders of our ADSs to influence the governance of our company may be limited.

Holders of our ADSs may not have the same ability to influence corporate governance with respect to our company as would shareholders in some U.S. companies. For example, the ADS depositary may not receive voting materials in time to ensure that holders of our ADSs can instruct the depositary to vote their shares. In addition, the depositary’s liability to holders of our ADSs for failing to carry out voting instructions or for the manner of carrying out voting instructions is limited by the deposit agreement. Finally, except under limited circumstances, our shareholders do not have the power to call shareholders’ meetings.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 59



Back to contentsContents


ITEM 4: INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY

We are a leading global provider of environmental management services, which include water and wastewater services, waste management services, energy services (excluding the production, trading and sale of electricity, other than production through co-generation) and transportation services.  Our clients include a wide range of public authorities, industrial and commercial services customers and individuals around the world.

The legal and commercial name of our company is “Veolia Environnement.” Our company is asociété anonyme, a form of stock corporation, incorporated in 1995 pursuant to the French commercial code for a term of 99 years.  Our registered office is located at 36/38, avenue Kléber, 75116 Paris, France, and the phone number of that office is (+33 1) 71 75 00 00.  Our agent in the United States is T. Michael O’Brien.Brian Sullivan. He can be reached at Veolia Water North America Operating Services, 184 Schuman Boulevard, Naperville,Environnement, 700 East Butterfield Road, Suite 201, Lombard, IL 60563.60148.

Historical Background

Our company traces its roots back to the creation of Compagnie Générale des Eaux by Imperial decree on December 14, 1853.  During the same year, Compagnie Générale des Eaux won its first public service concession for the distribution of water in the city of Lyon, France. Early on, it commenced developingOur company developed its municipal water distribution activities in France by obtaining concessions in Nantes (1854), Nice (1864), a 50-year concession for water distribution services in Paris (1860) and its suburbs (1869).

In 1980, Compagnie Générale des Eaux reorganized its water activities by regrouping all of its design, engineering and execution activities relating to drinking water and wastewater treatment facilities under its subsidiary Omnium de Traitement et de Valorisation (OTV). At the same time, Compagnie Générale des Eaux expanded its business during the 1980s with the acquisition of Compagnie Générale d’Entreprises Automobiles (CGEA, which would become Connex and Onyx, and later Veolia TransportationTransport and Veolia Environmental Services)Propreté) and Compagnie Générale de Chauffe and Esys-Montenay (which would merge to become Dalkia).  It also began significant international expansion.

In 1998, Compagnie Générale des Eaux changed its name to “Vivendi” and renamed its main water subsidiary “Compagnie Générale des Eaux.”

In April 1999, in order to better distinguish the separate existence of its two main businesses, communications and environmental services, Vivendi created our company under the name “Vivendi Environnement” to conduct all of its environmental management activities, which were then conducted under the names Vivendi Water (water), Onyx (waste management), Dalkia (energy services) and Connex (transportation).

On July 20, 2000, our shares were listed on the Premier Marché of Euronext Paris, which became the Eurolist of Euronext Paris on February 21, 2005.2005 and Euronext Paris on November 21, 2007.

In August 2001, our shares were included in the CAC 40, the main equity index published by Euronext Paris, and in October 2001 were listed in the form of American Depositary Shares for trading on Thethe New York Stock Exchange.

From 2002 to 2004, Vivendi (formerly known as Vivendi Universal) progressively decreased its stake in our company, and has held only 5.3% of our shares sincefrom December 2004.  See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Major Shareholders.”  In April 2003, we changed2004 until July 6, 2006, when Vivendi completed the sale of its shares in our name to “Veolia Environnement.”company.   

In 2002, we began conductingundertook a significant restructuring in order to refocus on our core environmental services activities. This restructuring was completed in 2004 with the sale of various U.S. subsidiaries within our water division conducting certain non-core activities, and with the sale of our indirect interest in Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas (FCC), a Spanish company whose activities include construction and cement services, as well as other services related to the environment.

In April 2003, we changed our name to “Veolia Environnement.”  On November 3, 2005, we unveiled a new branding system for our group. Our water, waste management and transportation divisions currently operate under the same name: “Veolia.” See “—Major Developments in 2005”  below.

Our principal capital expenditures and divestitures are described under “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.”  Material capital expenditures currently in progress include those associated with the continued expansion of our existing businesses and replacement and maintenance spending related

10



Back to our existing operations.Contents


Major Developments in 20052007  

Below we discuss the main developments in our business during 2005.2007.  The discussion below and in the remainder of Item 4 includes the revenue amounts that we expect to earn from various contracts (most of which are long-term contracts), including total revenue expected to be generated from all services under combined contracts to build and operate facilities.  These revenue amounts take into account updates to our volume and price assumptions since the date these contracts were publicly announced.  In addition, revenue amounts expected under foreign contracts won during 20052007 have been converted into euro at the rate of exchange prevailing on December 31, 2005.2007.  As a result, publicly announced revenue amounts may differ from the amounts of expected revenue included in this document.  In addition, these expected revenue amounts constitute forward-looking statements that involve r isks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those described under “Item 3. Key Information–Risk Factors.”  Actual revenue amounts may differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements.  See “Forward-Looking Statements” at the beginning of this document for a more detailed discussion of the risks and uncertainties to which our forward-looking statements are subject.

Roll-outCash rights offering

On July 6, 2007, we announced the success of our cash rights offering for an amount of €2.6 billion.  The subscription period lasted from June 14 to June 27.  The gross amount of the “Veolia” Brandcapital increase was €2,581,469,688 (including issue premium), resulting in the creation of 51,941,040 new shares.  As a result of this capital increase, we reinforced our shareholders equity and increased our financial flexibility in order to maintain growth following the announcement of several significant acquisitions since June 2006 and our 2007-2009 investment program.

New projects and acquisitions

Since November 3, 2005,In 2007, we have been rolling out a new branding program. Our water, waste management and transportation divisions have been brought together under a single name: “Veolia.” The energy services division continues to be associatedreinforced our position in our business sectors with the brand name “Dalkia.”

The brand roll-out, which was initiated by the executive committee, illustrates our determination to unite our divisions and heighten our public profile. This change also aims to reinforce our corporate identity and culture, as well as to strengthen the commitment of our employees to our strong service-oriented values. Over time, the Veolia brand is expected to become a benchmark worldwide for trust, reliability and expertise in environmental solutions.

In connection with the roll-out, the holding companies of the water, waste management and transportation divisions, as well as most of our operating companies, have changed their corporate names to integrate the name “Veolia”.  The roll-out will not affect our ability to conserve specialty brand names, such as “SADE”, in respect of which the related division will always be specified.

A Strong Business Model

Since our initial public offering, we have gone through a series of stagesnew, targeted acquisitions which we hope will generate growth and cost synergies.

We invested more than €2.5 billion in establishingexternal growth opportunities in our business model and independence, whichpriority development areas during the 2007 fiscal year alone.  Following our acquisition of Cleanaway UK (third in 2004 culminatedwaste management in the saleUnited Kingdom in June 2006, our acquisitions of non-strategic assetsSulo (second in waste management in Germany) and TMT (the leading private provider of Italian thermal waste treatment) announced in April and May 2007, TNAI (which holds the largest private portfolio of heating and cooling networks in the U.S. as well asUnited States) in June 2007, and part of the salenon-regulated activities of Thames Water which was finalized in November 2007 were the most significant.

We intend to continue this strategy in 2008 and 2009 by making value-generating investments that either lead to operational cost synergies, or accelerate development based on technological or commercial leverage in its prioritized geographical areas and on growth markets, in compliance with our investment criteria.

Innovation and new areas of activity

We seek to offer its clients innovative solutions that meet all of their sustainable development concerns. This goal has led us to study the development of new areas of activity related to our traditional activities and expertise and which can further our sustainable development prospects.  In 2007, we created a department of new areas of activity, which utilizes and relies on the existing teams and skills of our interest in FCC.  Our refocusingoperational entities.

Several new areas of activity have already been identified and have been the object of initial projects or studies. The common feature of these new areas of activity is that they encourage growth and enhance the activities of our activities on services related todivisions. Examples include biofuels, wind generation or residential services. Other areas have been the environment should enable us to strengthen our positionfocus of initiatives and investigations, such as air quality, ecological transportation or sustainable development (ecological neighborhoods and buildings).

In the field of renewable energies, we have developed the production of biofuels, a leader instrong growth market.  We favor the production of biofuel from waste, such as used cooking oils.  Indeed, this market going forward, by relying on the same consistent strategy for growth.

New and Renewed Contracts

We are present in growing markets, and in 2005 won contracts with several public and industrial clients.

Reaffirming the Group’s Values

The length of our contracts, our partnerships with clients and supplierssolution presents a very positive environmental balance and the local naturerecycling of these oils is an integral part of the waste treatment process. This project, which utilizes the industrial skills of SARP Industries, creates significant synergies not only with our historical core activities place sustainable development at(particularly recycling and collection), but also with the centerprospects for our fleets of our business and values.vehicles. The first plant to produce biofuel from used cooking oils will open in 2008 in Limay. It will have a production capacity of 40,000 tons per year, which may grow to 80,000 tons per year.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 611



Back to contentsContents


Regional Balance

We haveThe market for wind-generated energy also shows a strong positiongrowth potential sustained by continued support policies. It is an attractive proposition in differentcertain countries in Europe, and will pursue targetedabove all in the United States and balanced development in Asia, where there is considerable growth potential.  In 2007, we acquired 50% of the capital of Eolfi, which currently operates 26 MW in France and is building 12 sites that represent an additional 120 MW capacity.  By the end of 2008, Eolfi’s production capacity is expected to reach more than 150 MW. In addition, numerous projects are pending abroad, notably in Greece, Poland and Asia. With Eolfi, we can meet the expectations of customers, particularly local communities and industrial customers, who also wish to include a “wind-generated energy” aspect in their sustainable development projects.  Eolfi will allow us to optimize certain real estate asse ts that are ideal sites for wind turbines.

Finally, in the residential services sector, through our subsidiary Proxiserve, we have occupied a competitive position in the market for individual boiler maintenance.  More recently, Proxiserve has successfully developed a profitable and expanding domestic assistance activity (in plumbing). The millionth domestic assistance contract was carried out in November 2007.  Based on these activities, we intend to develop a whole range of services that will meet concerns relating to sustainable housing for individuals: energy diagnosis, installation of renewable energy equipment (such as heating pumps and flat plate collectors), maintenance of installations, and assistance and repair for heating, plumbing and electricity. Our activities relating to services for individuals are provided under a common brand, Veolia Habitat Services.

A significant presence on the desalination market

Resource scarcity stemming from land irrigation, drought, floods that degrade water quality, or the over-development of ground water tables, combined with growing needs for water (due to population density growth), are a major challenge to the production of drinkable water in certain arid regions, in particular regions where such phenomena are aggravated and reduce the availability of water.  The desalination of seawater is therefore expected to become one of the main alternative production methods for drinkable water in the coming decades.

Our division Veolia Eau, which has more than 100 years of desalination experience, is one of the few companies that can offer a complete range of services and innovative solutions, and is therefore in a strong position within this rapidly expanding market thanks to its subsidiaries specialized in construction and thanks to its operational experience. Its commercial successes in recent years speak for themselves.

In terms of design and construction, we are a leader in thermal and reverse osmosis desalination processes, and have at our disposal numerous standard-setters in all types of existing treatments within the various entities of Veolia Eau Solutions & Technologies (such as SIDEM and WESTGARTH).  In 2006 and 2007, Veolia Eau Solutions & Technologies won significant contracts in the Middle East, in Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and in the Fujairah Emirate of the United Arab Emirates.  We also benefit from established operational expertise and have a deep pool of experience, for instance in Ashkelon (Israel), which began operations in September 2005.  In 2006 and 2007, Veolia Eau won two contracts in Australia for the design, construction and operation of reverse osmosis desalination units to supply water to the cities of the Gold Coast and Sydney.

Market forecasts for the desalination of seawater, taking into account all techniques, estimate that production will increase significantly between now and 2015. Mediterranean countries (Algeria, Libya, Spain), China, Australia and the U.S.Middle East (Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates) will multiply their desalinated water production capacity by a factor of 2 to 10, with the countries of the Persian Gulf adding reverse osmosis to thermal desalination techniques (such as distillation).

Forward-looking choicesSustained activity growth and relevance of the sustainable growth model

For many years,Since our listing, we have engagedachieved various milestones in growing researchour independence and development efforts that aimorganization, culminating in 2004 with our sale of non-strategic American assets and our interests in the Spanish company FCC. Our refocusing of activities on environmental services under long-term contracts placed us, as early as 2005, in a favorable position to integrate new technology intosustain our operations.rank as worldwide leader in environmental services, driven by a consistent strategy relying on proven capabilities.

Our 2007 fiscal year was another year of profitable growth, consistent with our objectives.  With revenue growth of 14% (14.9% on a constant exchange rate basis) in 2007, demonstrating continued commercial dynamism, and significant growth in operating income, we confirmed our capacity for profitable growth. We have also invested significantlyrecorded a significant increase in employee trainingour net income attributable to the equity holders of the parent and skills development.  improved our return on capital employed since 2002, reflecting increasing profitability for shareholders. The maturity of certain contracts makes it possible for us to continue to improve profitability and to emphasize the relevance of our profitable growth model.  As such, we continue to pay close attention to the quality of our portfolio of contracts and the selectivity of our investments.

“Veolia Skills” Program

In September 2005, we engaged12



Back to Contents


Our inclusion in a largethe Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI) and innovative recruiting campaignFTSE4Good indexes

Created in France referred to as “Veolia Skills.” The objective under1999 and 2001, respectively, the campaign is to recruit 17,000 new employees between nowDow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI) and FTSE4Good index select companies based on their performance in sustainable development.  We were included in the end of 2007.

All of these recruitments will involve professional skills training lasting between 9 and 24 months, which will lead to a diploma recognized by the French Education Ministry.  Once a diploma has been obtained, candidates will be offered indefinite-term employment.

This recruiting campaign is open not only to youths but also to persons over the age of 18, since we need employees of all ages within our organization. It is also open to existing employees, in order to afford them greater mobilityDow Jones Sustainability Index and in the spiritFTSE4Good index in September 2007.

Our selection demonstrates, in particular, our performance in relationships with stakeholders, especially in respect of ongoing skills development.

“Veolia Environnement 2005” Efficiency Plan

We announced an efficiency plan at the end of September 2003 called “Veolia Environnement 2005,” which we hoped would generate €300 million in annual savings beginning in 2006. This objective has been achieved one year in advance, with €304 million in savings recorded in 2005 compared to 2003 when the plan was announced (after deduction of one-time costs relating to implementation of the program). These savings were generated through improvements to our operational processes (35% contribution to savings), support functions (26%) and purchasing functions (21%),human resources management, as well as through an optimized use of assets (18%). All ofwith clients and local communities. In addition, our operating units contributed to this success.  During 2006, the efficiency enhancement tools and methods developedEnvironmental Management System was a significant factor in connection with the program will be reinforced and deployed by operating units as part of an ongoing effort to improve performance.  

Limiting Greenhouse Gases

An increase of greenhouse gasesour inclusion in the atmosphere has led certain countries, as well as the international community, to implement regulatory measures in order to limit their progression.  At the international level, the Kyoto Protocol, finalized in 1997, came into force in February 2005. At the European level, the European Union has decided to implement a quota exchange system for carbon gas emissions, through Directive 2003/87/EC of October 13, 2003.  This system has been in place since the beginning of 2005.these indices.

We are already activealso part of the ASPI Eurozone index (Advanced Sustainable Performance Indices). The ASPI Eurozone index, launched in this field atMarch 2002, is composed of the European Union level120 principal stocks of the Eurozone selected according to social, environmental and internationally, as well as at the national level (see Note 46 to our consolidated financial statements).

·

At the European Union level, all large combustion installations with thermal output greater than 20 MW fall under the new quota exchange system. For our group, this primarily affects our energy services division, which manages almost 250 such installations in Europe (i.e., more than 2% of total installations). Quotas awarded to Veolia Energy Services represent approximately 1% of all European quotas awarded. Veolia Energy Services has worked with customers to help keep carbon dioxide emissions within quota limits, and has established an organization dedicated to this endeavor.  This has enabled us to intervene early within the quota exchange market, and through our participation we have assisted clients in financing new investments that help to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Some of Veolia Water’s sites in Germany have also been affected, following its win of certain municipal contracts (Stadtwerke).corporate governance criteria.


·

At the international level (Kyoto Protocol), we have begun trying to generate emission credits that would be tradable on the market, by participating in projects with other countries that help to reduce greenhouse gases. Veolia Environmental Services and Veolia Energy Services have already tested this in practice, through projects in Brazil, Egypt and Lithuania.  By using dedicated teams, they intend to pursue this activity in the future.  Regarding transportation services, the first challenge in reducing greenhouse gas emissions is to establish reliable measurement tools. Veolia Transportation is actively involved in developing an initial tool that would apply to business transport, in collaboration with the organization Enterprises for the Environment (EpE) and the French Agency for Environment and Energy Management (ADEME).13



·

At the national level, a number of countries have designed mechanismsBack to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, either in the form of a set of targeted incentives (as France has done under itsPlan Climat) or in the form of “domestic projects” that allow selected projects to benefit from emission credits (as New Zealand, Canada, Australia, and some U.S. states have done). The latter method is currently being studied by France as well. Our teams are following all of these developments and attempting to integrate them into their planning.Contents


Direct greenhouse emissions on sites that we managed in 2005 reached 33.7 million tons of CO2 (carbon dioxide) equivalent (compared to 31.5 million tons in 2004).


We are generally contributing to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, both through the daily management of sites that we operate and through the use of renewable and alternative energies (in particular biomass, landfill gas, geothermal energy).  We are actively following regulatory developments that will undoubtedly become more onerous in the future, viewing them as new opportunities to develop our environmental management skills.


Responding to Natural Disasters


The year 2005 was marked by three natural disasters in different parts of the world: (i) the tsunami of December 26, 2004 that caused the deaths of more than 200,000 people in Indonesia, Sri Lanka and the Maldives, (ii) Hurricane Katrina, which hit the U.S. states of Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama and devastated the city of New Orleans on August 29, 2005, and (iii) the earthquake that hit Kashmir on October 8, 2005, leaving 3 million people without shelter as winter approached.


In each case, Veolia Waterforce – our emergency humanitarian assistance organization – was present through its network of employee volunteers. Veolia Waterforce works in partnership with the Red Cross, Catholic Aid, UNICEF and the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Through the use of specialized materials made available by the Veolia Environnement Foundation, Veolia Waterforce produced more than 25 million liters of drinking water during the three months following the tsunami. In Louisiana, it installed a mobile water treatment line for the city of Kenner (75,000 inhabitants) near New Orleans. In Pakistan, Veolia Waterforce installed a facility to produce 200 cubic meters of water per day to serve the refugee camp of Thuri, near Muzaffarabab.  


In the majority of large-scale natural disasters, access to drinking water plays a major role in the survival of affected populations. Created in 1998, Veolia Waterforce mobilizes volunteer employees and uses our group’s know-how to satisfy this most basic need in crisis situations.


BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Our Market

Traditionally, environmental management services, which include water treatment and distribution, wastewater treatment and collection, waste treatment and management, energy services (excluding the production, trading and sale of electricity, other than production through co-generation) and transportation, were provided in an uncoordinated manner, each by a different entity. PublicMoreover, public authorities and industrial and commercial companies moreover, typically metwere able to meet many of their own environmental needs without lookingturning to private firms that specializespecializing in these areas. This situation has changed fundamentallydrastically in recent years, however, asyears. The need to take action to prevent further damage to the environment has become a global reality. There is a growing need for excellence and efficiency, which has led decision-makers to seek a global approach to the management of activities affecting the environment in order to devel op solutions that allow interaction and optimization among these environmental management services.  These measures, now widespread, have led to an increased demand for integrated environmental management services. This trend has been highlighted by the continued global expansion of industrial and commercial companies, have continued to expand onwhich has generated a global scale and increasingly requireneed for environmental management servicesservice providers with a global reach.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 7



Backwho are able to contents


respond to their clients on an international scale.

We believe that demand for external and integrated customized packages of environmental management services is likely to grow around the world for the following reasons:

·

In a world that combines accelerated urbanization with demographic growth, major investments in environmental projects and services, as well as effective management, are needed in order to meet increasingly stringent environmental standards, provide growing urban populations with adequate environmental services and replace existing environmental infrastructure.  In addition, there is also an increase in public demand, which now widely reflects a concern for high-qualitysustainable development, must respect commitments made at the international level and reliablemust set exemplary standards. The qualitative criteria underlying environmental products and services.requirements are increasingly a decisive factor in the choice of providers, which is an advantage for us.


·

Governments throughout the world face budgetary constraints and often lack the technical and operational skills of private sector firms to address environmental issues efficiently.  As a result, public authorities and private businesses are increasingly turning to the private sector to address their environmental needs.


·

Public and private entities are increasingly attempting to simplify the administration of their complex operations by outsourcing a wide variety of responsibilities to a single partner.  This tendency createspartner, thereby creating a business opportunity for companies capable of offering a broad range of environmental management services in an integrated fashion.


·

Large private firms and public authorities increasingly recognize that a “one size fits all” approach will not meet their unique and changing needs. As a result, demand for customized environmental management services has grown.increased.


·

The increasingly multinational profile of many large industrial and commercial firms encourages them to outsource non-core activities to companies with similar geographic reach in order to simplify administration and ensure they receive consistent service at each of their facilities.


We think that each of these trends, taken individually, creates significant opportunities for companies with our expertise, and, taken as a whole, they allow our company, in particular, to provide high-quality innovative and (depending on customer needs) integrated environmental management services in markets around the world.


Our Clients


We provide environmental management services to a wide range of public authorities, industrial and commercial customersservices clients and individuals around the world.




14



Back to Contents


Public Authorities


Demand by public authorities (often small localities that are increasingly joining forces together)pooling resources) has been influenced and strengthened by trends relating to the search for quality, efficiency, innovation and reduced costs as well as a heightened sensitivity(by integrating operating concerns starting at the development stage), and by their commitment to environmental issues, including the management ofresponsibility, particularly with respect to  water resources, air pollution, mass transportation policies and energy consumption. These trends, combined with a movement towards greater urbanization, are increasing the need for essential environmental services.


As a result,While we have the know-how to adapt to our clients’ expectations and needs, we also believe that  our historical business model—most often takingglobal contract model, which permits us to provide services tied to performance obligations, as well as, depending on client requests, the formdevelopment, construction and even financing of “delegated management contracts” in Francenecessary investments, remains as relevant as ever. It enhances innovation and of “concessions” in most places outside of France—is more relevant than ever.efficiency through mutual research efforts and the periodic re-tender for contracts. Depending on the country the actual contractinvolved, this model may take several legal forms. Certain countries, including those subject to European Union law, distinguish public markets from concessions (or other forms but remains characterized byof Public Private Partnership, or PPP), based on whether the service is provided to a public authority delegatingentity or directly to end-users, and depending on whether the managementassignment is based on the service being provided or the completed work, or on the risk to revenues assumed by the compa ny.


In France, since the middle of variousthe 19th century, public authorities have generally chosen to have public services (water, sanitation, transportation, waste collection and urban heating) managed by companies through contracts that were traditionally considered to be concessions (or leases, in the absence of investment completion assignments) and which are now legally qualified as public service delegations, but which remain concessions under the European Community’s definition.  They have frequently preferred, at least in the case of certain public services, to private operators,continue to manage the construction of installations, as well as their financing, before making them available to the provider or lessee during the term of the contract.


In the last few years, a new trend has emerged in which public authorities in all countries, including France, have asked companies to manage not only the rightsnecessary development and completion of work and installations or public facilities and equipment (as varied as, for example, administrative or educational buildings, hospitals, transportation infrastructure, prisons, water treatment facilities or waste treatment plants), but also their financing and long-term maintenance before recovering them at the end of the contract. These contracts, which together are often categorized as PPPs, fall into two main categories.  The first category includes contracts similar to those in the market category: the resources intended to cover the cost of work and their financing are similar to a contract price or guaranteed amount from the public authority, and the service is provided to the authority once work is completed.  The sec ond category includes contracts resembling concessions under the European Community’s definition:  resources must be sought from a commercial operation of the public service (the public or general-interest service whose operation has been delegated) which is the main focus of the contract, the completion of work being only a means to that end. Distinct accounting treatments according to the IFRS standard (reporting or non-reporting of a financial asset corresponding to debt of the public authority) apply in each case.  We prefer to distinguish these PPPs based on the nature of the assignments (“Build Operate Transfer” or “BOT”, “BFOT” if financing is added, or “DBFOT” if development is added).


In France, since the public market code (code des marchés publics) now prohibits entrusting companies with the construction and operation of a commissioned project, on one hand and all of its financing assignments, on the other, it became necessary, in order to do so.  This model leaves to public authoritiesencourage the roledevelopment of defining, organizing and overseeingthis type of global PPP contract (which does not fall under the services provided to inhabitants. At the same time, the private operator charged with the provision of these services uses its expertise to deliver them more efficiently, resulting in a mutually beneficial relationship between the private operator and public authority. Public authorities can assume a larger or less prominent role in the managementcategory of public services, depending on their needs. We believe that we can adaptservice delegations (délégations de service public), which is the French term for community concessions), to the different needs and expectationscreate a new category of public authorities around the world in order to assist them in (i) responding to the need for heightened efficiency and productivity in the provision of public services in order to control costs, (ii) accessing more sophisticated technical skills in order to resolve complex environmental problems, and (iii) responding to the demand for prompt and professional service expressed by end users.


In France in particular, we intend to take advantage ofpartnership contracts, created under a Frenchordonnancedated June 17, 2004 allowing for the creation of a new form of partnership contract.  The2004.  Thisordonnanceallows public authorities to entrust private operators (who may be associated with financial organizations) with the entire responsibility for building and/or financing an installation and operating the services related thereto, in exchange for compensation that is paid by the public authorityauth ority as a function of performance.



This contractual model of delegated management or concessionbetween a public entity and private companies, whatever their form, is widely used for the provision of collective services, but is not the only one.available model.  Public authorities may decide that they should not be directly involved in the provision of certain public services.  In these instances, they are oftenusually not the ownerowners of facilities or networks, and do not enter into contracts with a preferred private operator; instead, they leave the provision of the public service to market forces.the market. They may nonetheless occasionally verify the abilities of private operators by issuing operating licenses and regulating service conditions and prices.  This situation rarely arises with respect to water services, but is more common in the fields of energy services, waste management and transportation. Public authorities may also holdhave an ownership interest in the private operator in these instances; wew e may seek to acquire a stake in these operators as well.




15



Back to Contents


Services Sold Directly to Individuals


We also offer services directly to individuals through our specialized subsidiaries. These services include assistance and maintenance relating to water (including meter-reading), heating and gas services.


Industrial or Commercial Services Companies


We offer our industrial and commercial services clients a large range of services, which generally aim to achieve the following two main goals in relationrelating to the environment:environmental protection:


·

furnishingprovide clients with the services necessary for their industrial processes (vapor, industrial heating and cooling, processed water, demineralized water, compressed air, etc.) and optimizing their consumption thereof, and


·

reducingreduce the impact of their industrial processes on the environment, which may include treating effluents, recycling and recovering waste, and maintaining durable and efficient waste elimination channels.


We often partner with such clients over the long term, and offer innovative solutions adaptedtailored to the needs of each industrial site.


We believe that the further development of our industrial client base will bemake up a significant area of growth.growth area.  In particular, multiservice contracts entered into with industrial clients have assumed an increasingly important role and are expected to continue to do so.  See “—Development of Synergies: Multiservice Contracts to Benefit Industrial and Commercial Services Clients” below.


Our Overall Strategy

Our strategyaim is to strengthencontinue to reinforce our position as the leading provider of environmental services. Our strategy focuses on developing the most appropriate environmental services solutions for our local and industrial clients; maintaining a geographically diverse area of activity; developing a significant presence in growth markets with high potential and accelerating synergies between our different businesses.    

By strengthening our position as the leading provider of environmental services worldwide, leaderwe continue to implement our business model aimed at improving our economic and financial performance.  This performance is a result of economies of scale and technological expertise, combined with significant levels of research investment, long-term commitments to clients and managed risk.

By providing the most appropriate environmental services, we are able to optimize our client relationships.


While preserving our local character, we have become a major actor in both the services and the concessions businesses. We have achieved a unique position within these two client segments.  In 2007, we reinforced our core business in large European countries through targeted acquisitions in the United Kingdom, Germany and Italy.


With respect to our municipal activities, we have added to our impressive portfolio of existing French and European clients (Prague, Bucharest, Nottingham, Braunschweig), and have also achieved a number of commercial successes in the United States (Indianapolis, Chicago, Boston) and in the Asia Pacific region (Canton, Shanghai, Incheon, Melbourne).  Thus, we have illustrated our ability to participate in large privatizations and win bids for large projects.


We have also conducted a significant portion of our business with our industrial and commercial services clients, particularly for the provision of environmentalenergy and waste management services.  In particular,We have also created a new business portfolio made up of large industrial accounts (Peugeot, Novartis, Renault), with a significant contribution coming from multi-service contracts.


Successful geographic diversification


Our international business continues to increase along with our strategy consists of:volume of business in France, which has continued to grow at an average annual rate of over 5% per year since 2000.

·

offering our clients – both municipal and industrial – environmental solutions that are effective from both a technological and cost standpoint;

·

pursuing growth and improving margins, by continually seeking ways to enhance productivity;

·

fostering more efficient use of natural resources around the world in pursuit of sustainable development.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 816



Back to contentsContents


Beyond Europe, which has become our domestic market, we have also achieved strong positions in the United States and Asia. We relyhave taken on a significant role in energy services in the United States.  Our presence in developed countries presents relatively little risk of decreasing as it is largely unaffected by relocations and restructurings.


We have also developed a significant presence in emerging and developing countries. We regularly add new contracts and expand our energy services activities in China.  Our economic position in these areas of the world is much more significant than the proportion of our revenues earned in these areas suggests.


A strategy focused on growth and high-potential markets


Our strategy is to focus on growth markets.  An increasing awareness of the challenges relating to sustainable development and its impact on environmental policies has resulted in significant growth opportunities.  


Faced with increasingly restrictive regulations and in order to keep up with competition, more and more industrial companies outsource environmental services through long-term partnerships. Their partners generally work on all of their industrial sites worldwide and tend to provide a full range of services.


Expansion in municipal markets principally results from the combination of several demographic factors: an increase in population size on the one hand, and the urban development rate on the other. Growth is also a function of economic activity and living standards. The tightening of environmental restrictions and related regulations has fuelled our growth.  A recent example of this growth potential within these markets is the success of desalination projects in the Middle East.


Economic constraints affecting our industrial and municipal clients increase their need to reduce water and energy consumption and waste production. Our position as a service provider, as opposed to a utility provider, generally allows us to leverage this trend.  


Additional growth potential in related businesses


Because of our expertise, commercial relationships, and geographical distribution, we possess several important advantages allowing us to develop services that are directly related to our environmental services.  These opportunities result from new demand relating to changes in employee management, technical solutionsthe economic, ecological and complex contractual models in seekingpolitical landscapes, and which are all related to achieve these goals.  the promotion of sustainable development.  Examples of this trend include green fuels, wind energy and residential services.


One business:Synergies between our different businesses accelerate our growth


In our environmental services business with both public authorities and industrial clients, we enjoy important synergies between our water, waste management, transportation and energy services divisions.  Since we offer a complete range of services, our clients have broadened the scope of the services they seek from us.


This synergy is particularly evident within countries or municipalities where demographic changes, urbanization and economic development have accelerated significantly. In these cases, we have been called upon to find solutions to the growing environmental problems facing clients.  We offer a significant competitive advantage over funds or other financial investors, who have been weakened by the current market crisis.


Strong economic and financial resources

We focus exclusively on the provision of

Our solid position results from market growth trends, but also from our competitive assets, including our technological and technical expertise, our financial stability, our geographic presence, and our experience in providing environmental services in four main areas: water, waste management, energy services and transportation.  We have made a strategic choice to concentrate only in these areas.  For instance:

·

since 2000, we have decided not to be present in the primary energy production market, in order to focus more fully on providing services to clients that help to optimize their energy consumption;

·

in 2004, we finished disposingcompliance with regulatory requirements.  The success of our industrial assetscapital increase, completed in the water sector (mostly in the United States) relatingJuly 2007, also strengthened our financial capacity, thereby ensuring our development and reducing our exposure to equipment production and the short-term service activities they generate;market fluctuations.

·

in 2004 as well, we sold our minority interest in FCC, a Spanish company whose activities include construction and cement services, as well as other services related to the environment.

Targeted international developmentSize advantages

The needs of our planet in matters relating to the environment are significant. Numerous countries suffer from poor water quality, uncontrolled pollution, inefficient energy consumption and poor traffic conditions; accordingly, the need for skills in these sectors is significant. The opportunities for long-term growth in our business are therefore extensive.

Within this context, our strategy is to actively, yet carefully, develop our activities internationally. We currently conduct more than half of our activity outside France. Considering the growing needs in the area of environmental services, we are in a position to pursue international growth selectively, by focusing on areas of strong economic development and countries where acceptance of our business model and the ability to fulfill long-term contractual commitments is most pronounced.

While pursuing growth in France and in Western Europe, we also seek to develop our business:

·

in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, which are new entrants into the European Union;

·

in certain targeted Asian countries, in particular China, where there is a significant need for services related to urban growth and compliance with environmental standards; and

·

in large markets still mostly closed to management by environmental services companies like ours, such as the United States, whose medium-term potential is still important.

In 2000, we also created Proactiva Medio Ambiente (Proactiva), a subsidiary held jointly with FCC, in order to coordinate the development of our and FCC’s water and waste management activities in Latin America and the Caribbean.

Our solid internationalsize alone provides us with significant synergies.  In addition, our presence accordingly allowsin all segments of the value chain means that our vertically integrated structures allow us to partner with numerous large cities and industrial clients aroundmaximize the world, while providing uniform quality service.benefits of added value.


Development in the industrial sector

Industrial companies currently face large challenges, including the need to continuously improve performance and competitiveness, ensure the safety of personnel and installations and develop internationally.  Faced with these challenges, the management of environmental services – which are complex by nature – has assumed increased importance, and plays a key role in these companies’ performance. Increases in the price of energy, more stringent environmental regulations, the opening of the rail freight market and the increased importance of recycling and waste-to-energy recovery present new challenges to companies, but opportunities at the same time.

Within this context, we seek to partner with industrial clients in their search for enhanced performance and competitiveness, in both France and abroad. We offer clients innovative and customized outsourcing solutions, while building partnerships that are respectful of both employees and the environment. By following this approach, we have become the preferred partner of numerous industrial companies and won several industrial contracts over the past five years in both France and abroad.

A long-term commitment alongside municipal and industrial clients

One of our strengths is our ability to establish effective, long-term relationships with clients. Public authorities seeking to improve the environment for citizens must be able to rely on a partner that can develop a long-term presence in an area, who can permanently improve the functioning, for example, of a water treatment or production facility, a waste incineration or landfill facility, or an urban heating network, or who can manage the public transport network of an area, with the utmost concern for issues of security, cleanliness and the rights of employees.

Industrial clients, who are increasingly outsourcing the management of non-core activities, also desire to form long-term relationships. They therefore seek partners who can manage environmental services at their industrial sites for an extended period. These services include treatment of industrial effluents, utility production (vapor, compressed air, etc.) for waste-to-energy recovery and management of rail freight transport. Proper management of these services can often have an impact on the public at large, particularly when it comes to management of municipal contracts – making the choice of long-term partner all the more important.

Long-term contracts adapted to the needs of each client

In response, we have developed a high level of contractual expertise across our four divisions that allows us to commit to clients over the long-term. One example is the 50-year contract we entered into with the municipality of Shanghai. Over the past several years, we have demonstrated the ability to adapt our contracts to a variety of constraints in countries around the world while providing a broad range of services.

Long-term contracts provide a measure of visibility both to clients and to our shareholders.  For clients, whether they be public authorities or commercial or industrial companies, long-term contracts can also provide efficiency gains by providing them with a real partner for the future. Long-term contracts can lead to improvements in performance and productivity as part of a strategy that integrates, in addition to local factors, technical, labor and management considerations and, if necessary, financing of required infrastructure or investments.

Strong financing capability

We partner with clients in order to help them finance required infrastructure, investments and other work, which is made possible through long-term contracts and optimized operating performance. Accordingly, we have the ability, in particular through forming new partnerships and obtaining third-party financing, to help our clients realize their more ambitious projects. Such projects typically involve the water, waste management and energy services sectors.  At the same time, we have been able over the past several years to successfully realize our strategy for reducing net debt, despite this willingness to partner with clients for all of their financing needs.

Continuous research efforts

Our activities require substantial technical knowledge and specialized teams whose skills are constantly expanding. We have implemented a research program for all of our activities pursuant to which researchers are currently preparing for our group’s future. These researchers are in direct contact with our operating teams so that clients can benefit from the latest technological developments.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 917



Back to contentsContents


Strong presenceSupport of operating teams on the ground

In addition to tailoring our contract provisions to the specific needs of each client, we also tailor our services to each client. Through call centers, our operating teams are quickly informed of any required responses.

In crisis situations, our operating teams have consistently shown their professionalism, commitmenttechnological developments and solidarity, whether it be during the floods in Prague in 2003 or during the aftermath of the tsunami that struck southeast Asia on December 26, 2004.

In an original way then, we combine the advantages of being a large group with the ability to develop a local foothold for each of our operations.   

Rigorous management adapted to business needs so as to protect shareholder interests  improved know-how

A constant effort to improve the return on capital employed is a key factor in ensuring the sustainability of our development strategy, as well as the promotion of shareholder interests. In order to do so, our operating and financial teams undertake new projects selectively, after having analyzed all of the risks involved as well as their distribution among parties. Further, these teams attempt to use any debt leverage effectively.

The favoring of organic growth, the frequent search for financial partners to help finance new developments and our strong market position all help towards the realization of these objectives.

Focus on sustainable development

Sustainable development is part of the very nature of our activities. It is for this reason that we have made it a part of our development strategy.  We partner with clients on a long-term basis in order to satisfy fundamental population needs, through an offering that seeks balanced development.

We have also attemptedbeen expanding our Research and Development activities for a long period of time. Research and Development is essential to impose this culture of responsibilityaccomplishing our missions and solidarity on our corporate management structure, by favoring internal mobility, enrichment of skills and recognition of professional accomplishments.

The constant pursuit of these values means that we are currently well-positionedallows us to  respond to the needs and expectations engenderedof our clients. Since 2000, we have centralized our R&D business into one unique organization which is now supported by the strengtheningstrategic research, innovation and sustainable development committee created in 2006 by our board of directors.


We also benefit from the technical exchanges in areas such as prevention of the Legionnaires’ disease, treatment and recycling of sediment, bioenergy, and management of High Environmental Quality buildings.


Long-term contracts


We make long-term commitments to our clients. Our human resources policy, which emphasizes, among other things, employee training, allows us to focus on the long term, in particular through the considerable professional efforts of Veolia Expertise (Veolia Compétences), a program that was renewed in 2007.  In 2005 and 2006, this program allowed us to make extensive recruitments in France.


Moreover, aside from its social, environmental and health standards, as well asethical aspects, sustainable development directly influences the increased sensitivityexpectations of clients, thus forming a crucial element within the commercial dialogue. Sustainable development trends have led to changes in our economic model in order to move from a volume-maximizing model to a resource-optimizing model.


Managed risks


Given our growth objective, we have implemented a management and risk calculation policy, marked in 2007 by the mapping of the public, elected officialsmajor risks at the Group and industrial companiesdivision levels.  By putting in place a coordinated risk prevention and management plan, we are addressing this issue of fundamental concern to environmental issues.our future development.


These various strategic factors have allowed us to develop a profitable growth platform with room for future accelerated growth.


Our Strategy by Division

Water

Our water division, Veolia Water, will pursue further development ofEau, intends to continue to expand its water services throughoutaround the world.  While doing so, it will striveworld, while striving to ensure the quality and safety of drinking water, the conservation of natural resources and the protection of the environment.

The growth potential of the international market for water services has the potential to grow worldwide, supportedis driven by four factors in particular:

·

population growth and higher urban density,

·

the strengthening of environmental standards and sanitary norms andhealth regulations,

·

the growing acceptance of the delegated public service management model and public-private partnerships as alternatives to public management, and

·

the attemptrefocusing by industrial clients to refocus on their core businesses.

Given this growth potential, we will selectively pursuecontinue our selective development in the water sector in order to optimize our useallocation of resources, operating costs and profitability. AsIn order to take advantage of market opportunities, we do so, we will rely on our technical expertise, our experience in managing client relations and the mobilization of local teams on the ground in order to anticipate the future needs of public authorities. We will also continue to train our employees to meet the challenges of tomorrow.  Veolia Water’s increasedEau’s technical expertise in various desalination methods, and wastewater recycling in particular, represents a major effort to adapt to ongoing changes in market conditions.

Going forward therefore, Veolia WaterEau will seek to capitalize on the sustainedlong-term international development opportunities, for development worldwide, the maturing of its larger contracts and the productivity gains resulting from efficiency programs it launched in 2003 (relating to purchases,purchasing, information systems and sharing of best practices).



18



Back to Contents


Waste Management

Through Veolia Environmental Services,Propreté, we seekintend to pursue our development asbecome one of the world leaders in the waste management sector.  As is the case with our other businesses, the waste management sector is showing signs of consistent and lasting demand, which has been reinforced by the tightening of environmental rules and regulations coupled with increased public demand in a number of countries.  As a result, capable experts who can provide services under cost-effective conditions and in accordancecompliance with environmental regulations are becoming more highly sought after.

Within this favorable market environment in Europe, the United States and the Asia-Pacific region, we have the following priorities for our waste management division:

·

developingenhancing our waste treatment capabilities and wideningdeveloping our technological leadexpertise in waste treatment and recovery;

·

strengthening theour service offering to industrial clients by capitalizing on our mastery of the entire waste management chain, while seeking to generate synergies with our other operating divisions;

·

increasing the profitability of our activities by renegotiating tariffs,fees, maximizing productivity and reducing structural costs; and

·

while ensuring that all of our activities contribute to the development of high value-added services.

Energy Services

Through Veolia Energy Services (Dalkia), we seek to becomeare the European leader in the energy services sector. In 2000, we entered into a strategic partnership in the energy services sector with EDF, a European leader in the production, distribution and sale of electricity, in order to be able to offer clients comprehensive energy services at the best possible price.

The opportunities in the sector are significant, due to increases in particularenergy prices and public awareness of environmental problems, which have undeniably encouraged searches for solutions such as Dalkia’s initiatives to reduce the openingeffects of greenhouse gases and encourage energy markets in Europe and the growing need for energy management services throughout the world.conservation.

OurDalkia’s development strategy for this divisionis focused primarily on heating and cooling networks, the management of service sector buildings and retail centers, the handling of industrial utilities, and energy provision and services in the health sector.

It includes the following geographical priorities:

·

pursuing growth in Southern Europe (including Italy and Spain)by participating in the trend toward market consolidation and by developing our offers to the private sector;

·

pursuing developmentgrowth in the area of large heating networks, particularly in France and in Central and Eastern Europe;Europe, and in large cooling networks in the Middle East;



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 10



Back to contents


·

pursuing growth in North America by developing our presence in theoffering management services for management of networks, industrial utilities and shopping malls.malls; and

pursuing growth in China (networks and industrial utilities) and in Australia.

These development priorities will depend on our ability, in the context of deregulated energy markets in Europe, to offer innovative technical solutions that often combine our expertise in several areas. We will also attemptaim to promote our integrated outsourcing services to public clients as well as commercialto service sector and industrial clients, by combining optimized services for facilities management (heating, air-conditioning, utilities, electricity, lighting).

Transportation

Through Veolia Transportation,Transport, we seek to be a leading European and worldwide private operator of public transportation services.



19



Back to Contents


Between 2000 and 2020,2030, the proportion of the world population living in urban areas is expected to increase from 50% to 60%, and urban transport needs are expected to increase by 50% by 2020 (source: International Association of Public Transport).  These demographic changes will likely increase concerns relating to the environment and urban congestion, with public transportation services constituting a foremostmajor concern for the local authorities and inhabitants of large cities.  Accordingly, such changes should help to support Veolia Transportation’s futureTransportation always has an impact on the image and identity of a large city, its economic development, strategy.urban renewal projects, and local solidarity.

The challengemajor challenges in this sector are related to the ever-increasing need for us innew transport infrastructures, to environmental concerns, and to the transportation marketgrowing demand for the customization of mass transportation.

Veolia Transport’s strategy is to carefully control our development, by anticipating risksimprove its performance in its basic passenger transportation activity with the following priorities:

Continued efforts to address marketing, innovation and identifying the priority areas for growth. We have therefore chosen to consolidate our presence in France and the rest of Europe, by profiting from the opening of various European markets to regulated competition.

In Europe, the markets in Germany and Central Europe in the area of railway transport in particular appear promising, while France appears a promising market as well in the longer term.  North America and Australia are also priority areas for growth, and we are carefully considering the market potential in China and Latin America, due to the opportunities they may present for the transportation division.

Finally,environmental concerns in order to diversify our businesscontinue to better satisfy clients;

A focus on local or regional passenger transportation;  

Selective growth based on the attractiveness of markets and take advantagethe intensity of local competition;

Continued growth in related activities such as railway freight given the synergies with our other activities, we are pursuing development of ferry transport and rail freight transport, inimportance for the wake of European Union legislation that has authorized the opening of such markets.environment.

Our Services

Our company is an environmental services provider, and is the only major provider to offer a unique actor in the field of services related to the environment, offering a comprehensive arraycomplete range of services.  We have the expertise,are able to provide clients with a full-service package tailored to fit their individual needs, which may include, for example, to supply treatedsupplying water, recycling wastewater, collecting, treating and to recycle wastewater at a customer’s facility, to collect, treat and recoverrecycling waste, generated in the facility, and to supplysupplying heating and cooling services, and optimizegenerally optimizing the industrial processes used in such facility, all in an integrated service package designed to address the customer’s unique circumstances.their facilities.

Our operations are conducted primarily through four divisions, each of which specializes in a single business:business sector: Veolia Water(water)Eau (Water), Veolia Environmental Services (waste management)Énergie (Dalkia) (Energy Services), Veolia Energy Services (Dalkia) (energy services)Propreté (Environmental Services) and Veolia Transportation (transportation)Transport (Transportation). Through these divisions, we currently provide drinking water to more than 10878 million people and treats sewer water for 53 million people in the world, treat nearly 5366 million tons of waste, satisfy the energy requirements of hundreds of thousands of buildings for our industrial, municipal and individual customersclients and transport approximately 2.52.7 billion passengers per year.  We strive to offer our clients the combined services to clients that spanof each of our four divisions, which are packaged either packaged in the form of a single multiservicesmulti-service contract, or negotiated separately in the form of several individual contracts.

The following table breaks down our consolidated revenue for 20052007 by geographic market and division, after elimination of all inter-company transactions.


(in millions of euro)*

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Total

Europe

8,190.5

6,889.4

6,566.1

4,291.8

25,937.8

of which:

 France

4,927.2

3,332.0

3,852.2

2,144.5

14,255.9

Other Europe

3,263.3

3,557.4

2,713.9

2,147.3

11,681.9

North America

582.5

1,449.0

19.3

738.9

2,789.7

Rest of the World

2,154.4

875.9

311.0

559.4

3,900.7

of which:

South America

104.5

163.1

143.3

28.5

439.4

Africa-Middle East

1,017.3

100.7

56.3

17.8

1,192.1

Asia-Pacific

1,032.6

612.1

111.4

513.1

2,269.2

Total

10,927.4

9,214.3

6,896.4

5,590.1

32,628.2

*

Revenue from ordinary activities under IFRS.


(in millions of euro)*

Water

Waste Management

Energy
Services

Transportation

Total

Europe

7,122.7

4,551.9

5,289.2

3,533.9

20,497.7

of which: France

4,413.1

2,901.0

3,205.6

1,734.0

12,253.7

Other Europe

2,709.6

1,650.9

2,083.6

1,799.9

8,244.0

Americas

647.0

1,434.9

81.5

411.7

2,575.1

Rest of the World

1,119.0

617.3

31.7

404.1

2,172.1

of which:Africa-Middle East

609.0

86.5

15.0

9.9

720.4

Asia-Pacific

510.0

530.8

16.7

394.2

1,451.7

Total

8,888.7

6,604.1

5,402.4

4,349.7

25,244.9

*

Revenue from ordinary activities under IFRS.



20



Back to Contents


The dates set forth below relating to new contracts we have won or renewed correspond to the date of announcement or signing of such contracts, or to the date of our commencement of operations under such contracts, depending on the circumstances.contracts.   


Water

Through our water division, Veolia Water, the lead company of which is Veolia Eau – Compagnie Générale des Eaux, we are the world’s leading provider of water and wastewater services for public authorities and industrial companies. Further,In addition, Veolia Water,Eau, through its subsidiary Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies (f/k/a Veolia Water Systems) is the world leader in the design of technological solutions and the construction of structures necessary to performfor the performance of such services.

With approximately 70,76582,867 employees around the world31, Veolia Water servesEau provides drinking water to more than 10878 million people around the world, supplies 53 million people in the world with clean water, and operates more than 4,400 contracts. Veolia WaterEau has a permanent presence in 5760 countries, principally in France for historical reasons, but also in the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Romania. It is pursuing targeted growth in Russia, Armenia Slovakia and Hungary. AsiaThe Asia-Pacific region (China, South Korea, Japan and Japan)Australia) also remains an important target for development objective, following the award of significanta number of contracts with municipal and industrial clients duringin the past several years. Veolia WaterEau has a presence in the United States through its contracts for the operation and maintenance of water and wastewater treatment plants, including its contract with the cityci ty of Indianapolis. Finally, Veolia WaterEau has also established a presence in Africa, prim arilyprimarily in Morocco and Gabon.

With aThanks to its network of research centers in France and abroad, Veolia WaterEau has mastered numerous technologies and tools within the water sector.  As a result, Veolia WaterEau is able to offer highly skilled services in the areas of sanitary protection, spillage reduction, productivity enhancement of water networks and plants and resource preservation.preservation of resources.  

Combined withGiven its combination of a strong local presence on the ground and more than 150 years of experience in the provision ofproviding services to public authorities and industrial clients, Veolia Water’sEau’s technical aptitude provides it with an important advantage in the extremely competitive water services market, which is extremely competitive.market.

Increased demand within the water services market has been driven substantially by clients seeking to optimize the management of their existing resources, whether they be public authorities seeking to respond to the trend towards urbanization or industrial clients.  New solutions, such as desalination (demonstrated by(an example of which is the entry into service at the end of 2005turnkey contract signed in 2007 to provide one of the Ashkelonlargest sea water desalination plantplants in Israel)the world in Saudi Arabia) or re-use of treated water, may also be called forneeded depending on an individual client’s circumstances.

1  As of December 31, 2005, including Proactiva’s 1,718 employees who are active in water activities.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 11



Back to contents


The following table shows the consolidated revenue and operating income of our water operations in each of the last two fiscal years,division, after elimination of all inter-company transactions.

(in millions of euro)*

2005

2004

Change2005/2004

Revenue**

8,888.7

7,777.4

+14.3%

Operating income

1,007.3

799.5

+26.0%

*

Includes our share in the results of the water activities of Proactiva, our joint venture with FCC.

**

Revenue from ordinary activities under IFRS.


Water*

(in millions of euro)

2007

2006

Change
2007/2006

   
    

Revenue**

10,927.4

10,087.6

8.3%

Operating income

1,267.7

1,160.6

9.2%

    

*

Includes our share in the results of the water activities of Proactiva, our joint venture with FCC which operates principally in the water and environmental services in South America.

**

Revenue from ordinary activities under IFRS.


1  As of December 31, 2007, including Proactiva’s 1,939 employees who are active in water activities.



21



Back to Contents


Overview of Veolia WaterEau


Veolia WaterEau manages municipal drinking water and/or wastewater services on five continents thanks to a geographical organization with a strong local presence.  Contracts with public authorities are typically long-term and range from 10 to 20 years in length, but may extend up to 50 years in certain circumstances. These contracts take various forms, all adapted to the needs and goals of the public authority, and may include outsourcing contracts, public-private partnerships, concessions, BOT (Build, Operate & Transfer) contracts, DBO (Design, Build & Operate) contracts and others (discussed further under “—Contracts” below).others. They are generally contracts that involve the operation, design or construction of installations, with the public authority usually remaining the owner of the assets (except in the United Kingdom and Chile)Kingdom) and the head of water policy.  Further, recentRecent legislative changes w ill allowhave enabled us to integrate more elaborate mechanisms into our contracts to address increasesa llowing us to share in the added value  produced under the contract and the division thereof  (e.g., productivity gains, improvement in the level of services, efficiency criteria, etc.). Public authorities often call uponrely on Veolia WaterEau to manage customer relations; it has implemented specific services and information systems in response, which it continuously strives to improve.  


In certain countries where public authorities wishhave sought either to either implement new water and wastewater treatment systems or improve the functioning of existing ones, Veolia WaterEau also offers feasibility studies and technical assistance, which may include research plans, network modeling and financial analysis.


Veolia Water’sEau’s outsourcing contracts with industrial and commercial services customers generally last from 3 to 10 years, although certain contracts have terms of up to 20 years.


Service Contracts forwith Public AuthorityAuthorities and Industrial Clients


The main focus of our water business is on water and wastewater management services for public authorities and industrial clients.  Veolia WaterEau provides integrated services that cover the entire water cycle. Its activities include the management and operation of large-scale, customized drinking water plants, wastewater decontamination and recycling plants, drinking water distribution networks and wastewater collection networks. Veolia WaterEau also manages customer relations, providing billing services and call centers.


Veolia WaterEau and its subsidiaries have provided outsourced water services to public authorities in France and in the rest of the world for more than 150 years under long-term contracts adapted to local environments. Currently, Veolia WaterEau and its subsidiaries are attempting to capitalize on the worldwide trend towards delegated management of municipal drinking water and wastewater treatment services.


In France, Veolia Water operates in over 8,000 municipalities, supplying water to more than 24 million people and treating wastewater generated by approximately 16 million people.


Veolia WaterEau continues to develop its service offerings for industrial clients using its local presence in various areas and its adapted service organization. It has accordingly become active within this market in France, the United Kingdom, Germany and the Czech Republic, as well as in Asia (South Korea and China in particular) and the United States. Veolia WaterEau also contributes within VE Industries (as discussed further below) to the development of common service offerings of our group, in particular in Europe.Europe, with VE Industries (as discussed further below).


Engineering and Technological Solutions for the Treatment of Water


Through Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies, Veolia WaterEau is one of the world’s leading designers of technological solutions and of the construction of facilities necessary to provide water services on behalf of public authorities and industrial and commercial services clients. In addition, Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies designs, assembles, manufactures, installs and operates modular standardized and semi-standardized water and wastewater equipment and systems designed to treat water for municipal and industrial uses. A local technical assistance network is available at all times for the upkeep, maintenance and after-sale service of these installations.


Veolia WaterEau treats groundwater, surface water, brackish or seawater, wastewater and refined sludge. Thanks to the combination of physical, chemical or biological treatments, Veolia Water developsEau has developed a complete range of specific solutions for the purification of water or the reduction or elimination of impurities in effluents.  Veolia Water’sEau’s recycle/re-use systems provide customers with the ability to circulate part or all of their treated water back into plant processes, thereby reducing their water usage, operating costs and environmental damage.


Through Sade, Veolia WaterEau also designs, builds, renovatesrenews and recovers urban and industrial potabledrinking water and wastewater networks and conducts related work in France and around the world.  Sade’s services cover each stage of the water cycle, from its collection to its release, and its public and industrial customers benefit from Sade’s experience in this domain.area.



22



Back to Contents


Description of Activities in 20052007


In 2007, Veolia Water’sEau enjoyed several commercial successes, and its revenues increased by 14.3%8.3% in 2007 compared to 2004,2006, thanks to a high level of contract renewal in France, sustained internalorganic growth outside of France, in particular in Europe (Braunschweig contractAsia, and strong growth in Germany),the engineering and new large projectsconstruction business in Asia.


France and internationally.  Veolia Eau did not lose any significant contracts in 2007 relative to total revenues in the water division.

In France, contractsVeolia Eau provides approximately 24 million inhabitants with drinking water and 16 million with wastewater services. Contracts renewed in 20052007 represent expected total cumulative revenues of more than 885 million euros, and include significantalmost €920 million. Among the contracts renewed, the most important were with the citiesNice Côte d’Azur area, the city of Boulogne-sur-MerBeauvais, the city of Macon and Epernay. Accordingly, the Intercommunal Syndicate of the Mâconnaise Area, which bring together the latest technical innovations in environmental protection.

Veolia Water renewed a comparable numberEau continues its development efforts in order to further increase its service offering to reach new clients in areas such as the management of contracts duewastewater treatment plants, the management of mud storage, online availability of water consumption levels, management and maintenance of rainwater networks, the maintenance of non-collective wastewater installations, and the monitoring of swimming water, which are all services related to expire in 2005 as it did in 2004 (based on 2005 revenues). Atincreasing awareness of the same time, Veolia Water lost 40 contracts (compared to 39 in 2004), representing less than 6 million euros in annual revenues. However, the awardchallenges of new outsourcing contracts to Veolia Water and amendments to existing contracts so as to enlarge the scope of services provided thereunder managed to compensate for any loss of revenue that occurred due to public authorities’ deciding not to renew contracts in favor of direct management. The year 2005 therefore again demonstrated the confidence of public authorities in France in Veolia Water’s services.


sustainable development.

In the rest of Europe, growth was strong generally during 2005, but especiallythe EBRD has committed to invest up to €105 million in Germany, where2007, €90 million of which has been invested since 2007, to acquire 10% of Veolia Water beganVoda, a holding company for Veolia Eau’s businesses in Central and Eastern Europe, with the aim of increasing the role of the private sector in providing water distribution servicesconveyance and managementthe purification of waste water, notably in Russia and the municipal heating, electricity and gas network for the city of Braunschweig (Lower Saxony). The city of Braunschweig also awarded Veolia Water a contract for the management of the city’s wastewater services atUkraine.   

At the end of 2005, following a pan-European bidding process. In2007, the Czech Republic,International Finance Corporation (IFC), the municipalityprivate sector arm of Hradec Kralove awardedthe World Bank Group, and PROPARCO, the subsidiary of Agence Française de Développement in charge of financing private investments in developing countries, acquired shareholdings of 13.89% and 5.56%, respectively, in Veolia Eau AMI. Veolia Water AMI is a contract for drinkingsubsidiary of Veolia Eau and operates water, productionwastewater and distribution, managementelectricity services in Africa, the Middle East and the Indian subcontinent. The aim of customer relations,this holding company is to develop infrastructure to serve those populations who are without water and wastewater collection and treatment. In Italy, Veolia Water acquired interestselectricity in the water companiesurban areas of Sicily and Calabria, and increased its stake in the company managing water services for the province of Latina. In Armenia, Veolia Water signed a contract for the management of water services in the capital of Erevan.   


these regions.    

In the United States, Veolia Water signedMiddle East, in addition to the Jubail and Fujairah contracts, negotiations with the Sultanate of Oman led to the signing of a contract in January 2007, in partnership with National Power and Water, to provide wastewater treatment services at the military base of Fort Knox (Kentucky),build, finance and is participating actively in the repair of wastewater treatment plants in New Orleans following the damage caused by Hurricane Katrina (the financial impact of this natural disaster on Veolia Water’s accounts remains marginal). In Indianapolis, Veolia Water simultaneously obtained its ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 certifications.  This is the first time thatoperate a water services provider in the U.S. has been certified in both categories, for quality and environmental responsibility.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 12



Back to contents



In Ashkelon, Israel, Veolia Water began operation of the world’s largest reverse osmosis seawater desalination plant.


In China, Veolia Water pursued its developmentplant in partnership with Chinese investors with the gainOman (with a capacity of three major new contracts: (i) contracts to manage water services for the cities80,000 m3/day). The 22-year contract should represent estimated total consolidated revenue of Kunming (capital of Yunnan province in southwest China) and Changzhou (located in JiangSu province and approximately 100 kilometers from Shanghai), respectively, and (ii) a contract to modernize and operate a wastewater treatment plant for the city of Urumqi (capital of the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region).


In Australia, Veolia Water repurchased 47.5% of the capital of United Water from Thames Water, a subsidiary of RWE, which allowed it to hold 95% of United Water’s share capital as of July 1, 2005.  United Water is in charge of operating water and wastewater services for the city of Adelaide.  


In 2005, Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies’ design and construction activity for new installations made significant progress, due to the maturing of contracts won during previous years and the consolidation for one full year of the companies acquired at the end of 2004 (Berkefeld and Wabag). There were also some important commercial successes during 2005. In France, Veolia Water designed and constructed a water treatment plant using ultra-filter membrane technology in Hay-Les-Roses, built a new purification station in Perpignan and designed and constructed a sludge treatment unit in Aix-en-Provence using humid oxidation technology.  In Luxembourg (Beggen), Veolia Water was awarded a contract to repair and enlarge a wastewater treatment plant.  In Hungary, Veolia Water will participate in€434 million, including the construction of the plant.

In Asia, Veolia Eau won several contracts in China (see below) and in Japan, where it won a wastewater treatmentthree-year contract for the operation and maintenance of a water decontamination plant in Budapest.Chiba, a suburb of Tokyo which has experienced significant growth.  In Australia, the United States, Veolia Water will build a waste water treatment plant utilizing concentration through evaporation technology on behalf of an industrial client (Shintech). Innew Sydney contract followed the United Arab Emirates, Veolia Water will build a seawater desalination plant (Emirate of Sharjah). Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies also purchased the Weir Group’s water desalination activities (principally comprising the company West Parth based in Scotland) during the second half of 2005.


In Italy, Veolia Water sold its remaining interest in Bonna Sabla as well as its minority interest in Acque Potabili. At the end of 2005, Veolia Water also signed a contract to sell Berliner Wasser International (BWI); the sale is expected to closecontracts that were won in 2006 followingfor consulting services to the satisfactionState of certain conditions.Queensland to recycle water produced by treatment installations in the region of Brisbane in an effort to combat drought, and the design, construction and management of a desalination by reverse osmosis facility designed to sustain, in particular, the Gold Coast.


Finally, Veolia WaterEau recorded solid earnings in 20052007 due to the good performance of existing contracts across all geographical areas and in all business segments.  This success was also due to the continued pursuit of measures to enhance productivity (sharing(including sharing of best practices and better use of information technology, etc.)technology) and to the progress generated by the implementation of new technology during past years.years (including energy efficiency gains and return on installations and networks).




23



Back to Contents


Principal Contracts


The following table shows the principal contracts signed or renewed in 20052007 with either public authorities or industrial or commercial companies21.

 

Public Authority

or

Company and Location thereof

Month of Signature of Contract

New Contract or Renewal

Duration of Contract

Estimated Total Cumulative Revenue

(in euros)

Services to be Provided

France

     

Public Authorities

     

City of Hay-les-Roses(SEDIF)Nice Côte d’Azur and its suburbs

SeptemberDecember

NewRenewal

212 years

3075 million

ConstructionOperation of adrinking water treatment plant using ultra-filter membrane technology.services for the Nice Côte d’Azur communities.

Beauvais

October

Renewal

12 years

38 million

Operation of drinking water services.

Mâcon

June

Renewal

10 years

59 million

Management of water and waste water services.

Europe (outside France)

     

Public Authorities

     

City of Braunschweig (Germany)

January

New

16 years

5,600 million

Distribution of water, management of the municipal heating, electricity and gas network.

Sicily (Italy)Campo Dalias (Spain)

May

New

4018 months (construction) + 15 years (operation)

1,28078 million

OperationDesign, construction, operation and maintenance of drinkingreverse osmosis water services.desalination plant.

City of Hradec Kralove (Czech Republic)Companies

Shell Green (United Kingdom)

JuneSeptember

New

30 yearsmonths

56062 million

Production and distributionModernization of drinking water, management of customer relations and collection and treatment of wastewater.

City of Beggen (Luxembourg)

June

New

2 years

25 million

Repair and enlargement of a wastewater treatment plant.

City of Braunschweig (Germany)

December

New

30 years

390 million

Management of wastewater services.

City of Erevan (Armenia)

December

New

10 years

160 million

Management of water services for the city of Erevan (1 million inhabitants)

City of Budapest (Hungary)

December

New

4 years

58 million

Construction of a wastewater treatment plant in Budapest.Widnes in Cheshire.

Asia

     

Public Authorities

     

City of ChangzhouLanzhou (Gansu province, China)

January

New

30 years

1.6 billion

Acquisition of 45% of the Lanzhou municipal water company, company holding the water management contract (3.2 million inhabitants).

Haikou (Hainan island, China)

June

New

30 years

776 million

Acquisition of 49% of the company managing the production and distribution of drinking water and the operation of a wastewater treatment plant (800,000 inhabitants).

Tianjin Shibei (China)

September

New

30 years

675 million2.5 billion

Production and distributionAcquisition of 49% of the company managing the drinking water and management of customer relations.service (3 million inhabitants).

CitySydney (Australia)

July

New

23 years
(20 years of Urumqioperation)

540 million

Construction and operation of a water treatment plant through reverse osmosis with a capacity of treating 250,000 square meters per day.


1 Revenues expected under foreign contracts won during 2007 have been converted into euros at the rate of exchange prevailing on December 31, 2007 and represent the portion due to Veolia Eau under such contracts.   Accordingly, these amounts may differ from the amounts announced in earlier press releases.  



24



Back to Contents



Asia

Companies

Tianjin Soda (China)

September

New

2327 years

260492 million

ModernizationConstruction and operation of a wastewaterwater treatment plant.

City of Kunming (China)PTTPE (Thailand)

NovemberMay

New

3015 years

1,11075 million

ProductionConstruction and distributionoperation of water and managementtreatment plant.

Qingdao Soda (China)

June

New

25 years

33 million

Operation of customer relations.a demineralization plant.

North America

     

Public Authorities

     

U.S. governmentTampa Bay (Florida)

JuneApril

New

2016 years (13 years of operating)

108 million

Construction and operation concerning the extension of the surface water treatment plant of Tampa Bay.

Milwaukee (Wisconsin)

December

New

10 years

30272 million

Management of wastewaterthe regional liquid waste management network of the Milwaukee region, and rainwater collection networks onmanagement of the military baseproduction of Fort Knox at Radcliff.Milorganite, fertilizer in granules produced by the drying of residual mud from the waste water purification plant.

Africa

CompaniesPublic Authorities

     

Shintech (Louisiana)Mauritania

OctoberMay

New

2 years33 months

30203 million

Construction of a wastewater treatment plant utilizing concentration through evaporation technology.drinking water supply line for the city of Nouakchott.

Middle East

     

Public Authorities

     

Emirate of SharjahJubail (Saudi Arabia)

FebruaryJune

New

2 years34 months

45647 million

Construction and operation of a seawater desalination plant, able to process 800,000 cubic meters of water per day for use by the city of Jubail and the Eastern province of Saudi Arabia.

Fujairah (UAE)

August

New

32 months

547 million

Construction of a seawater desalination plant.

Fujairah (UAE)

December

New

12 years

71 million

Operation and maintenance of seawater treatment plant through reverse osmosis in Qidfa.


Acquisitions and Divestitures in 2005

The main acquisitions and divestitures during 2005 consisted of the following:

·

the start-up of operations under the Braunschweig contract in Germany;

·

in Italy, the acquisition of stakes in water companies in Sicily and Calabria, as well as the acquisition of an additional stake in the company that operates water services in the province of Latina;

·

in Australia, the repurchase of 47.5% of the capital of United Water from Thames Water, in charge of operating water and wastewater services for the city of Adelaide;

·

the purchase during the second half of 2005 of part of the activities of the Weir Group by Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies;  

2 Revenues expected under foreign contracts won during 2005 have been converted into euros at the rate of exchange prevailing on December 31, 2005 and represent the portion due to Veolia Water under such contracts.   Accordingly, these amounts may differ from the amounts announced in earlier press releases.  



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 1325



Back to contentsContents


·Principal Acquisitions and Divestitures in 2007

the sale

On November 28, 2007, Veolia Eau acquired a portion of the remaining interestunregulated activities of Thames Water in Bonna Sabla as well as the minority interestUnited Kingdom, principally for the provision of services and asset management in Acque Potabilithe water and sewage sectors, some of which are financed by the Private Finance Initiative (PFI).

In addition, the biological treatment activities of the Swedish company AnoxKaldnes were acquired and integrated in Italy.the second half of 2007.

In late 2007, Veolia Eau acquired the U.S. assets of one of the divisions of the Tetra Technologies Group. which is responsible for the treatment of waste in the petroleum sector.

Veolia WaterEau created, acquired or integrated 9296 companies during 2005,2007, and liquidated or sold 2548 companies. As of December 31, 2005,2007, Veolia Water’sEau’s group (excluding Proactiva) included 591684 companies, (comparedcompared to 524636 in 2004),2006. The principal changes included the purchase or creation of which 496new companies with contracts that were fully consolidated, 76 companies were proportionally consolidated and 19 companies were accounted for undereffective as of the equity method.beginning of 2007.

Waste ManagementEnvironmental Services

Through our waste managementenvironmental services division, Veolia Environmental Services,Propreté, we arehave become the second largest operatorenvironmental services provider in the world (in terms of revenue) in the area of waste collection, recycling and treatment. Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté is the only company that handles waste in all its forms and at all stages of activity.  For example, Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté manages liquid and solid waste and non-hazardous and hazardous waste (with the exception of nuclear waste) from collection to energy recovery, on behalf of both public authorityauthorities and industrial clients.  

With approximately 80,700 employeesIn 2007, Veolia Propreté once again reinforced its position by acquiring Sulo in Germany and TMT in Italy (now known as VSA Tecnitalia).

In 2007, Veolia Propreté employed 100,032 people around the world1, Veolia Environmental Services operates in approximately 35 countries.  Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté has partnered with more than 465,000750,000 industrial and commercial services clients42 and serves nearly 4560 million inhabitants on behalf of public authorities.

During 2005,2007, Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté estimates that it collected nearly 33.740.6 million tons of waste and treated nearly 5366 million tons of waste (of which 49.661.8 million tons were non-hazardous household and industrial waste and 3.53.9 million tons were hazardous waste). As of December 31, 2005,2007, Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté managed approximately 659796 waste treatment units.

The durationterm of Veolia Environmental Services’ waste managementPropreté’s environmental services contracts usually depends upon the nature of the services provided, applicable local regulations and the level of capital expenditure required under the contract. Collection contracts usually lastrange from 1 to 5 years in length, while treatment contracts can range from 1 year (for services provided on sites belonging to Veolia Environmental Services)Propreté) to 30 years (for services involving the financing, construction, installation and operation of new infrastructure).

The following table shows the consolidated revenue and operating income of our waste management operations in each of the last two fiscal years,environmental services division, after elimination of all inter-company transactions.

(in millions of euro)*

2005

2004

Change2005/2004

Revenue**

6,604.1

6,214.4

+6.3%

Operating income

530.5

467.5

+13.5%

*

Includes our share in the results of the waste management activities of Proactiva, our joint venture with FCC.

**

Revenue from ordinary activities under IFRS.

Environmental Services*

(in millions of euro)

2007

2006

Change

2007/2006

Revenue**

9,214.3

7,462.9

23.5%

Operating income

803.5

648.3

23.9%

    

*

Includes our share in the results of the waste management activities of Proactiva, our joint venture with FCC which operates principally in the water and environmental services in South America.

**

Revenue from ordinary activities under IFRS.

1 As of December 31, 2007, including Proactiva’s 6,850 employees who are active in environmental services activities.   

2 The commercial figures provided in this section (in terms of number of clients, number of inhabitants served, tons of waste collected, etc.) do not take into account Proactiva’s activities, unless otherwise indicated, but do take into account Sulo for the second half-year of 2007 and Tecnitalia for the fourth quarter of 2007.



26



Back to Contents






Overview of Waste ManagementEnvironmental Services


Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté furnishes waste managementenvironmental and logistical services, which include waste collection, waste treatment, cleaning of public spaces, offices and factories, maintenance of production equipment, treatment of polluted soil decontamination, and management of waste discharge at industrial sites.


In addition, Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté also conducts basic or more complex downstream waste treatment operations in order to reduce pollution and transform waste for the following uses:into a resource.  Veolia Propreté:


·

Veolia Environmental Services sorts and treats waste in order to create new primary materials, otherwise referred to as recycling or material recovery;

·

Veolia Environmental Services transforms organic material into compost to be returned to the soil, otherwise referred to as composting or agronomic recovery;

·

Veolia Environmental Services returns waste to the natural environment in the least damaging way possible, through landfilling or incineration;

·

Veolia Environmental Services produces electricity or heat through landfilled or incinerated waste, otherwise referred to as waste-to-energy recovery.


The services referred to above fall into one of three large categories of activity conducted by Veolia Environmental Services:


·

waste managementPropreté:  environmental services and logistics for local authorities and industrial companies;

·

companies, sorting and recycling of materials;materials, and

·

waste recovery and treatment through composting, incineration and landfilling.


Waste ManagementEnvironmental Services and Logistics for Local Authorities and Industrial Companies  


Maintenance of Public Spaces and Urban Cleaning


Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté provides urban cleaning services in a large number of cities throughout the world, including London, (U.K.), Paris, (France), Alexandria, (Egypt), Rabat (Morocco), Singapore and Chennai (India).Singapore.  Veolia Environmental Services’Propreté’s services include mechanized street cleaning and treatment of building facades.


Cleaning and Maintenance of Industrial Sites


Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté provides cleaning services toat its industrial and commercial services clients’ installations,sites, including cleaning of offices and maintenance of production lines. In the commercial services sector, it provides these services in train stations, subway networks, airports, museums and commercial centers.


In the industrial sector, cleaning services extend to food-processing plants and heavy industry and high-tech sites, where Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté offers specialized cleaning services (high pressure or extreme high pressure cleaning).  Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté also offers cryogenic cleaning, and reservoir cleaning at refineries and petro-chemicalpetrochemical sites in particular.  Finally, Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté has developed emergency services to treat site contamination upon the occurrence of an accident or other incident.


Liquid Waste Management


Through its subsidiary SARP, Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté provides liquid waste management services that consist primarily of pumping and transporting sewer network liquids and oil residues to treatment centers.  Veolia Environmental Services can also provide services following accidents and other incidents involving liquid waste.


Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté has developed liquid waste management procedures that emphasize environmental protection, such as the on-site collection, recycling and reuse of water during the provision of its liquid waste management services.  Used chemicals, which are hazardous to the environment, are collected before treatment and transferred to one of Veolia Environmental Services’Propreté’s subsidiaries that is specializedspecializing in the management of hazardous waste.  


3 As of December 31, 2005, including Proactiva’s 6,919 employees who are active in waste management activities.   

4 The commercial figures provided in this section (in terms of number of clients, number of inhabitants served, tons of waste collected, etc.) do not take into account Proactiva’s activities, unless otherwise indicated.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 1427



Back to contentsContents


Treatment of Polluted Soil Decontamination


Land redevelopment and the expansion of residential or commercial areas may occur in areas where the soil has been polluted through prior use. Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté has specific techniques for treating each site, which include treating polluted soil and rehabilitating temporarily inactive industrial areas, cleaning up accidental spills and restoring active industrial sites to be in compliance with applicable environmental regulations.  


Collection


In 2005,2007, Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté collected approximately 33.740.6 million tons of waste on behalf offrom individuals, local authorities and commercial and industrial sites.  More than 4560 million people around the world benefited from Veolia Environmental Services’Propreté’s waste collection services.


Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté collects household waste through door-to-door pickup or through pickup at designated drop-off sites, and collects commercial and non-hazardous industrial waste.  It maintains the cleanliness of green spaces and carries away “green” waste, such as dead leaves and grasses.


Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté also collects hazardous waste on behalf of its commercial and industrial clients, including hospital waste, laboratory waste and oil residue (ships, gas stations and drilling platforms)., as well as dispersed hazardous waste.  In 2005,2007, Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté collected approximately 1.9 million tons of hazardous waste.


Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté offers related services to its commercial and industrial clients, such as preliminary studies of future waste collection needs and waste tracking after collection.


Transfer and Grouping of Waste


When waste isWaste of the same type it is transported either to transfer stations in order to be carried in large capacity trucks, or to grouping centers where it is separated by type and then sorted before being sent to an adapted treatment center. Hazardous waste is usually transported to specialized physico-chemical treatment centers, recycling units, special industrial waste incineration units or landfills designed to receive inert hazardous waste.


Sorting and Recycling of Materials


Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté treats waste with a view towards reintroducing such waste into the industrial production cycle.  Veolia Environmental Services'Propreté's recycling activities generally involve the selective collection of paper, cardboard, glass, plastic, wood and metal that customers either separate into different containers or minglemix with other recyclable materials. As the use of separate containers has become more widespread, selective collection services have become well developed.


Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté received approximately 6.89 million tons of solid waste at its 229307 sorting and recycling units in 2005,2007, of which 4.66.1 million tons were recovered, including 22.8 million tons of paper.  Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté also provides decomposition services for complex waste products at specialized treatment centers, such as electric and electronic products and fluorescent lamps.  Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté works in partnership with upstream industrial customersclients and with Veolia Environnement’sour CREED research center in order to develop new recycling activities.  Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté sells or distributes recycled material to intermediaries or directly to industrial and commercial services clients.


Veolia Environmental Services designs and develops recycling systems that enable its industrial and commercial customers to optimize their production chains by reusing certain waste by-products generated in the manufacturing process, thereby reducing waste management costs.


Recovery and Treatment through Composting, Incineration and Landfilling


In 2005,2007, Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté treated nearly 5366 million tons of waste in its sorting and recycling centers, composting units, hazardous waste treatment centers, incineration units and landfills.


Composting and Recovery of Organic Material from Fermentable Waste


Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté and Veolia WaterEau work together to recover sludge from wastewater treatment plants.  In 2005,2007, Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté recovered almost 1.92.3 million tons of waste at its 97114 composting units. 207,000235,000 tons of urban and industrial sludge were reintegrated by Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté into the agricultural cycle through manure spreading.spreading with a related waste traceability service offering.


Veolia Environmental Services’ “Biodiv” service includes an adapted container offer for the frequent collection and nearby composting treatment of organic waste produced by industrial companies, while guaranteeing the complete traceability of waste from its collection

28



Back to its recovery in the form of high quality compost.Contents


Waste-to-Energy and Incineration


Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté treats approximately 9.411.4 million tons of non-hazardous solid waste (consisting mainly of urban waste) per year at its 6878 waste-to-energy recovery and incineration plants.  Energy is generated from the heat created by incinerating waste at these plants.  Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté uses this energy to supply district thermal networks or for sales to electricity providers. Waste-to-energy recovery is often the favored treatment solution in areas of high population density where there is insufficient space to construct landfills.


Landfilling and Energy Recovery from Waste


In 2005,2007, Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté treated approximately 30.938.4 million tons of non-hazardous waste in 143150 landfills.  Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté has developed the expertise to treat waste through methods that reduce emissions of liquid and gas pollutants.  Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté currently has 124160 landfills that accept or have accepted biodegradable waste and that are equipped to retrieve and treat biogas emissions from the anaerobic fermentation of waste, of which 5476 landfills have recovery systems to transform biogas emissions into alternative energies.


Treatment of Hazardous Waste


In 2005,2007, Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté treated 3.53.9 million tons of hazardous waste, of which 906,0001.08 million tons were incinerated in 2022 incineration units for specialized industrial waste, 732,000759,000 tons were landfilled in 1114 class 1 landfills and 1.61.71 million tons were treated in 5261 units by physico-chemical or stabilization methods.  The remaining 312,000480,000 tons were treated in 3035 specialized recycling centers.


The principal methods used for treating industrial hazardous waste are incineration (for organic liquid waste, salt-water and sludge), solvent recycling, waste stabilization followed by treatment in specially-designedspecially designed landfills, and physico-chemical treatment of inorganic liquid waste.


Through its specialized subsidiaries SARP Industries and Onyx Environmental ServicesVES Technical Solutions (in the United States), and thanks to its acquisition at the end of 2005 of the hazardous waste management activities of the Shanks group in the United Kingdom, Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté has a worldwide network of experts enabling it to become one of today’sthe current world leaders in treating, recycling and recovering hazardous waste. 




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 15



Back to contents


Description of Activities in 20052007


In 2007, Veolia Environmental Services’Propreté’s revenues increased by 6.3%23.5% compared to 2004, due2006. Excluding exchange rate effects and the effect of acquisitions and divestitures, internal growth was 7.5%.  In France, revenue increased by 7.1% in 2007 (or 6.6% at constant scope) as a result of strong price increases for recycled materials (paper, metals), higher tonnages in the collection and sorting-recycling of solid waste, waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEE) operations and the treatment of polluted soils, the increase in tonnages to landfills and the combinationgood level of moderatebusiness activity at incineration plants.  In the United Kingdom, revenues grew 56.4%, or 7.9% for internal growth at constant scope as a result of the expansion of existing integrated contracts (East Sussex and Nottinghamshire) and industrial services (in particular in the petroleum sector).  In the rest of Europe, revenues gr ew 21.6%, or 8.4% at constant scope, driven particularly by momentum in Norway and Denmark.  In North America, organic growth was significant as a result of increased fees relating to solid waste, the Marine Services businesses, the new Pinellas contract and the treatment of military waste at Port Arthur.  South America benefited from short-term contracts in the chemical and petroleum sectors that allowed it to experience marked growth.  A limited number of significant contracts were lost in 2007:  Chennai in India (cleaning), Canca in France despite unfavorable market conditions,(collection in Nice), and solid growth abroad (+8.2% compared to 2004), in particularSolihull Borough in the United Kingdom the United States and the Asia-Pacific region. Veolia Environmental Services did not lose any major contracts in 2005.(collection).  Among the significant developments marking the yearin 2007 were the following:


·

In France, Veolia Environmental Services becamePropreté reinforced its recycling activities through the leading hazardous waste management companyacquisition of the Bartin Recycling Group, number 3 in France in the United Kingdom, having acquiredbusiness of recycling and reuse of scrap-metal and metals.  The development of D3E activities continued.  A new treatment unit for hydrocarbons and mineral liquid waste, Hydropale, was opened in Dunkirk.  A ship dismantling unit was created in Bordeaux.  In addition, the Shanks’ group hazardous waste activities.  These activities include collection, sorting, transfer, treatment and disposal of hazardous liquid and solid waste. The acquisition includes six chemical treatment sites, seven transfer stations and two waste-to-energy incinerators. Veolia Environmental Services’ market share has thus increased from 18% to 30%, making it the leading company in this sector in England.Polynesian businesses were sold.


·

Also inIn the United Kingdom, Veolia Environmental Services was named asPropreté, while managing the acquisition and integration of Cleanaway UK, signed a preferred bidder for a 26-yearnew 27-year PFI (“Private Finance Initiative”) contract for the integrated management of household waste in the Countycounty of Nottinghamshire (estimatedShropshire, representing estimated total cumulative revenue of €1.2 billion). The contract would commitmore than €1 billion.



29



Back to Contents


In Europe, Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté continued to achieving recycling and composting rates of over 50% by 2020reinforce its commercial position within the county (comparedincineration and related energy authorization sectors through the acquisition of TMT in Italy.  In Germany, the acquisition of Sulo enabled Veolia Propreté to an average rate of 18% currentlyreinforce its role in the United Kingdom).


·

Veolia Environmental Services was awarded a 3-year contract by the Alcatel group for the integrated waste management of electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) across Europe. The contract falls under the framework of the European directive on WEEE, and covers the collection, dismantling, processing, recovery and recycling of WEEE from the sites of Alcatel and its clients in 27 countriessector in Europe (all EU member states as well as Norway and Switzerland).


·the reuse of recycled material, especially paper.

In North America, Veolia Environmental Services won or renewed large municipal contracts and strongly developedPropreté reinforced its position within the industrial services sector, winning several contracts for the maintenance and hazardous waste activities.


·industrial cleaning of oil rigs in the Gulf of Mexico following the expansion of a fleet of specialized boats for this marine branch.  In early 2007, Veolia Propreté won a 17-year contract for the operation of the energy recycling unit in Pinellas County (Florida), one of the largest incineration units in the United States.

In Asia, Veolia Environmental Services strengthened its position with publicPropreté signed a 29-year concession agreement for the construction and private clients (see “—Principal Contracts” below). For example, Disneyland Hong Kong awarded Veolia Environmental Services withoperation of a 5-yearnew household waste management contract at its new theme park.


·

In Africa and the Middle East, Veolia Environmental Services won new contracts in Egypt (cleaning, collection and treatment of waste at the ports of Alexandria and Dekheila) and Abu Dhabi (management of cleaning services instorage facility for the city center). In addition,of Jiujiang in China.  A 28-year concession agreement for the Governorateoperation of Alexandria (whicha medical waste incineration unit was also signed with the city of Foshan.  Lastly, the repurchased Cleanaway businesses were integrated in 2001 awarded Veolia Environmental Services with a 15-year waste management contract) won third prize in the “Metropolis” (World Association of Major Metropolises) competition for global waste management and the cleanliness of its public places.


·

Building upon the joint initiatives that began in 2003, Veolia Environmental Services and the French Sailing Federation (FFV) signed a 3-year agreement to modernize approximately 480 French sailing schools.  Veolia Environmental Services has agreed to (i) collect and treat school waste (light sailboat wrecks, obsolete nautical equipment) that has accumulated over the past ten years, (ii) support FFV’s development of courses for sailing school instructors and students on protecting the nautical environment, and (iii) work with FFV to create teaching tools that make sailors more aware of the fragile nautical environment.


2007.

Principal Contracts


The following table shows the principal contracts signed or renewed in 20052007 with either public authorities or industrial or commercial companies51.


Public Authority

or

Company and Location thereof

Month of Signature of Contract

New Contract or Renewal

Duration of Contract

Estimated Total Cumulative Revenue (in

(in euros)

Services to be Provided

France

     

Public Authorities

     

SMITOM du Nord Seine et MarneSIOM (Chevreuse)

FebruaryJune

RenewalNew

135 years

18225 million

Operation and maintenance of athe household waste treatment channel and waste-to-energy recoveryincineration plant of household and other waste.Villejust.

SITOM Nord IsèreSMICTOM (Fontainebleau)

August

Renewal (related to a new plant)

17.5 years (2.5 years of construction work and 15 years of operation)

113 million

Construction followed by operation of an incineration plant for household waste, as well as operation of a heating network.

Urban Community of Greater Nancy

OctoberJune

Renewal

7 years

10524 million

ManagementTransfer, transport and treatment of household and otherhospital waste.

ParisLimoges

December

Renewal

10 years

40 million

Operation and maintenance of the household waste incineration plant of Limoges.

Companies

ArcelorMittal

June

RenewalNew

35 years (plus 8 month extension)

7621 million

Collection services.Supply of energy to the ArcelorMittal site, via the Arc-en-Ciel household waste incineration plant (Nantes).


1 Revenues expected under foreign contracts won during 2007 have been converted into euros at the rate of exchange prevailing on December 31, 2007 and represent the portion due to Veolia Propreté under such contracts.  Accordingly, these amounts may differ from the amounts announced in earlier press releases.  



30



Back to Contents





Europe (outside

(outside France)

     

Public Authorities

     

Waverley Borough CouncilShropshire (United Kingdom)

OctoberSeptember

New

27 years

1,030 million

Contract integrating the global treatment of waste.

Bautzen (Germany)

July

Renewal

7 years

3117 million

Collection and recycling of municipal waste.

Companies

Fundia Ameringsstal AS (Norway)

January

Renewal

1 year

21 million

Sale of rail metal.

Shell (Germany)

June (date of commencement)

Renewalwaste, sorting recycling and expansion

2 years

21 million

Industrial and refinery maintenance.composting.

North America

     

Public Authorities

     

Lee County, Florida (United States)Pinellas (Florida)

MarchJanuary

RenewalNew

517 years

52356 million

CollectionOperation and municipal services.maintenance of household waste incineration plant.

AsiaAsia-Pacific

     

Public Authorities

     

Foshan Gaoming LandfillJiujiang (China)

DecemberAugust

New

30 years

27092 million

Investment, design, constructionConstruction and operation of a landfill for household waste.Jiujiang landfill.

Guangdong HWTC Phase 1 (China)Singapore

MayNovember

NewRenewal

305 years

19728 million

Design, construction and operation of a treatment center for hazardous waste.

Guangzhou Likeng 1 WTE Plant (China)

June

New

10 years

47 million

Operation and maintenance of a waste-to-energy recovery unit for household waste.

Ilan County (Taiwan)

December

New

20 years

44 million

Incineration of municipal waste.Urban cleaning.


Acquisitions and Divestitures in 2007

5 Revenues

On July 2, 2007, Veolia Propreté finalized the acquisition of Sulo for an enterprise value of €1,450 million, which significantly reinforced its position in the waste management sector in Germany and in Eastern Europe.  Sulo was the second largest operator of waste management in Germany.  It is a leading specialist in paper and plastic recycling and has a high level of expertise in the areas of sorting and organic reuse.  Sulo is also a leader in Eastern Europe and in the Baltic states.  Sulo’s Environmental Technologies division was sold to Plastic Omnium in July 2007 for an enterprise value of €142 million.

In addition, on October 3, 2007, Veolia Propreté finalized the acquisition of 75% of the share capital of TMT (which has since been renamed VES Tecnitalia), the former subsidiary of Termomeccanica Ecologia in Italy.  Tecnitalia is the leading private thermal waste treatment provider in the Italian market.  It operates ten treatment installations, including four thermal treatment installations, and has numerous contracts, as well as several factories that are currently under construction.

Other less significant acquisitions occurred in 2007.  They are expected under foreign contracts won during 2005 have been convertedto increase Veolia Propreté’s treatment and recycling capacities in Europe, Northern America and in Asia.

Taking into eurosaccount all formations, acquisitions and integrations of companies (a total of 202) and liquidations, sales, and mergers (a total of 74), the scope of consolidation of Veolia Propreté (excluding Proactiva) included 753 companies at the rate of exchange prevailing on December 31, 2005 and represent the portion due2007, compared to Veolia Environmental Services under such contracts. Accordingly, these amounts may differ from the amounts announced625 in earlier press releases.2006.  




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 1631



Back to contentsContents


Acquisitions and Divestitures in 2005


In 2005, changes in Veolia Environmental Services’ group of companies (acquisitions and divestitures) were limited in number and impact, having no material effect on Veolia Environmental Services’ consolidation scope.


In France, net changes in the scope of consolidation generated an additional €7.4 million in 2005.  In the United Kingdom, the acquisition of the hazardous waste activities of Shanks contributed €9.9 million to revenues.  In other European countries, net changes in the scope of consolidation led to a decrease of €10.7 million in revenues.


In total, net changes in the scope of consolidation accounted for less than 0.1% of Veolia Environmental Services’ consolidated revenues during 2005.


Energy Services

Veolia Energy ServicesOur energy services division conducts its activities through Dalkia, the leading European provider of energy services to companies and municipalities.  Dalkia provides services relating to heating and cooling networks, thermal and multi-technical systems, industrial utilities, installation and maintenance of production equipment, integrated facilities management and street lighting. It seeks to profit fromleverage opportunities relatingfor the development of energy and greenhouse gas markets. Dalkia seeks to the opening of gas and electricity markets in Europe, as well as from the increased preoccupationpartner with sustainable development. Dalkia becomes a partner to its clients, helping them to optimize their energy purchases and improve the energy efficiency of their installations (both in terms of cost and atmospheric emissions) and profit from the trade in carbon dioxide emission licenses..


With approximately 47,000In 2007, Dalkia had 54,375 employees around the world (as of December 31, 2005), Dalkia has a permanent presence in 35 countries, located principally in France and the rest of Europe.


world. Dalkia is partly owned by Electricité de France (EDF), which holds 34% of its share capital and with which Dalkia is developing joint international offerings for international customers and eligible clientspresent in France (i.e., those that have the right to choose their electricity supplier freely, which currently includes all professional entities). Dalkia’s French operations are conducted through Dalkia France, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dalkia.  Outside France, Dalkia conducts its activities through Dalkia International,almost 40 countries, primarily in which it holds a 76% interest and EDF holds the remaining 24%.


Europe.

The following table shows the consolidated revenue and operating income of our energy services operations in each of the last two fiscal years,division, after elimination of all inter-company transactions.

Energy Services


(in millions of euro)

2005

2004

Change2005/2004

2007

2006

Change

2007/2006

    

Revenue*

5,402.4

4,919.8

+9.8%

6,896.4

6,118.4

12.7%

Operating income

326.1

250.3

+30.3%

398.7

377.7

5.6%

 

*

Revenue from ordinary activities under IFRS.

*

Revenue from ordinary activities under IFRS.

*

Revenue from ordinary activities under IFRS.



Overview of Energy Services


Dalkia’s business is currently facing three major challenges:

global warming and the need to reduce carbon dioxide emissions;

the increase in the prices of fossil fuels and their eventual scarcity; and

growing urban development and the related industrial development.

Dalkia’s activity focuses on optimal energy management.  Dalkia has progressively established a range of activities linked to energy management, including heating and cooling systems, thermal and multi-technical services, industrial utilities, installation and maintenance of production equipment, integrated facilities management and electrical services on public streets and roads.


 The health care sector is particularly important to Dalkia: in 2007, it won landmark contracts in that sector, such as Santa Casa de Misericordia in Brazil.

Dalkia provides energy management services to public and private clients with whom it has formed long-term partnerships. Dalkia’s management contracts to operatefor the operation of urban heating or cooling systems are typically long-term, lasting up to 25 or 30 years, while its contracts to operatefor the operation of thermal and multi-technical installations for public or private clients may last up to 16 years.  Contracts to provide industrial utilities services generally have shorter terms (6 to 7 years on average), while contracts in the facilities management sector generally last 3 to 5 years.


When possible, Dalkia offers its clients solutions utilizing renewable or alternative energy sources such as geothermal energy, biomass (organic material), heat recovered from household waste incineration, “process” heat (heat produced by industrial processes) and thermal energy produced by co-generation projects.  A combination of energy sources may also be selected so asin order to take advantage of the complementaritycomplementary nature of each source.


On January 1, 2005,  For instance, in 2007 Dalkia acquired PannonPower, the European market for the exchange of carbon dioxide emission quotas was formed.  As a result, Dalkia must now manage its own quotas and those of certain clients.  In total, 238 installationsleading biomass plant in 11 European countries have been affected. Dalkia has formed a special organization to manage its activities in this new market.


Hungary.

Heating and Cooling Networks


Dalkia is one of Europe’s leading operators of large “district” heating and cooling networks.  Dalkia currently manages 650700 urban and district heating and cooling networks worldwide, particularly in the world, particularly inUnited States, France, the United Kingdom, Italy, Germany, Eastern and Central Europe and the Baltic states.  Dalkia does not ordinarilynecessarily own the networks it operates.  Rather,operates, and in mostsome cases, public authorities own the networks and delegate to Dalkia the responsibility of managing, maintaining and repairing them.  The networks operated by Dalkia provide heating, sanitary hot water and air conditioning to a wide variety of public and private facilities, including schools, health centers, office buildings and residences.



32



Back to Contents


Thermal and Multi-Technical Services


Thermal services consist of operating heating, sanitary hot water and air conditioning systems to provide comfortable living and working environments, as well as improving the operation of existing systems to optimize their efficiency.  Dalkia provides public, industrial and commercial customersservices clients with integrated energy services, which include installationplant design, construction and improvement, energy supply, installationand plant management and maintenance. Dalkia provides customers with a large range of technical services and manages approximately 88,000more than 100,000 energy installationsplants throughout the world.


Industrial Utilities, Installation and Maintenance of Production Equipment


Dalkia has become a leading provider of industrial utilities services in France and the United Kingdom.Europe. It has thereby developed expertise regarding the analysis of industrial processes, the enhancement of productivity and the operation, maintenance and servicing of equipment.  Industrial utilities services generated 26% of Dalkia’s revenue in 2005.


Integrated Facilities Management


Facilities management contracts integrate into one global service a range of services, from thermal, electrical and mechanical equipment maintenance to logistics, into one global service.logistics.  As a result, the clientone company can meet its need fora client’s different services through one company.needs.  Dalkia provides facilities management services for its industrial or commercial customersservices clients (such as Coeur Défense or Canal+) at industrial, commercial,business premises, corporate officeoffices or health establishment sites.).


Street Lighting Services


Citélum,a subsidiary of Dalkia, has acquiredearned a worldwide reputation for the management of urban street lighting, the regulation of urban traffic and the lighting of monuments and other structures.  In France, Citélum operates and maintains the lighting for the Paris beltway.  During 2004 (“The yearin a number of Chinacities in France”), Citélum provided lighting services for the Eiffel Tower in ParisFrance and the Forbidden City in Beijing. In 2005, Citélum pursued its development in Asia, where it created a subsidiary (Citélum



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 17



Back to contents


Shanghai) to provideabroad, and provides artistic lighting services forat important architectural works and sites. It also renewed and2007 saw the opening of an establishment in Chile where Citélum won several contractsan operation-maintenance contract for public lighting in France, including the operation and maintenance of 8,000 light points and street lighting services for the city of Troyes.Santiago de Chile.  Citélum was also awarded a contract by the city of Syracuse in Sicily and also signed a Public-Private Partnership (PPP) contract with the city of Agde.


Services to Individuals


Dalkia provides residential services to individuals through Proxiserve, a joint subsidiary of Dalkia and Veolia Water,Eau, including maintenance of heating, air conditioning and plumbing systems and meter-reading services.


Description of Activities in 20052007


Dalkia’sIn 2007, Dalkia increased its revenues increased by 9.8%12.7% compared to 2004, due to2006.  These results were the combination of solid growth in France due to rising energy prices related to its thermal activities in particular, and strong growth abroad as a result of commercial growth and significant international expansion (particularly in central Europe and in the full effect of contracts recently wonAsia Pacific region), despite extremely mild winter weather in Central Europe (Poland, Hungary, Romania). In 2005, Dalkia won several contracts, among which the principal ones are:


·

In Poland, the finalization of a contract with the Polish Ministry of Finance to acquire ZEC Lodz, the company that manages urban heating for the city of Lodz, the second largest city in Poland.  ZEC Lodz had revenues of €167 million in 2004.


·early 2007.

In France, Dalkia signed its first contract to market and sell carbon dioxide quotas, with the municipality of Nimes. The goal is to use the sale of the carbon dioxide quotas to finance the transition to natural gas of the heating networks in western Nimes (involving 6,000 residences). The carbon dioxide quotas are available for sale thanks to a change in combustible fuel (using gas that is cleaner than heavy fuel) and an improvement in the energy efficiency of equipment.


·

In China, a memorandum of understanding signed in 2005 led to the signing of Dalkia’s first contract in China at the beginning of January 2006.  This contract involves the operation of the air-conditioning system and hot water network on the world's largest university campus, in Guangdong.


·

In the United States, Dalkia signed an agreement to acquire a steam distribution network in Cambridge, Massachusetts following a competitive bidding process. Located in the high-tech corridor near Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), the network supplies process steam to global leaders in biotechnology and pharmaceuticals. Dalkia will seek to record revenue of at least US$9 million in its first full year of operation in this high potential region.


Dalkia renewed approximately 81%80% of its contracts that were due to expire during 2007.  Contracts that were lost included the paper mills of the Gorge region due to the closure of the site, the heating network of a section of Bourges, thePalais des Congrèsin 2005.Nice, and the ONERA in Chatillon.  These include a contract to operate installations at Metz Thionville (estimated annual revenue of €2.8 million over 13 years), as well as a contract to manage energy services at the Rangueil hospital in Toulouse (estimated annual revenue of €1.5 million over 14 years).  These twounrenewed contracts also involve the installation of co-generation plants. Finally, in Sweden, Dalkia renewed and expanded its multi-technical services contract at Volvo’s Torslanda site.


Dalkia lost contracts representingrepresented approximately 2% of its consolidatedDalkia’s revenues.  Among those not renewed were

In addition to the contracts with Kodak at its Chalon site (givensigned in 2007, which appear in the site’s closing)table below, in October 2007 Dalkia began the implementation of a heat and a delegated public service managementelectricity supply contract for the heating networka bio-ethanol production plant in Borny, Metz.Usti Nad Laben, in the Czech Republic. This contract, signed in April 2006, represents estimated revenue of  €67.7 million over a period of 10 years.




33



Back to Contents


Principal Contracts in 2007


The following table shows the principal contracts signed or renewed in 20052007 with either public authorities or industrial or commercial companies61.

Public Authority

or

Company and Location thereof

Month of Signature of Contract or of Renewal

New Contract or Renewal

Duration of Contract

Estimated Total Cumulative Revenue

(in euros)

Services Provided

France

Public/Local Authorities

Lille

December

Renewal

8 years

5 million

Management of 282 communal buildings in Lille: schools, cultural, social and administrative centers.

Vandoeuvre

March

Renewal

20 years

6.135 million

Management of heating network.

Vémars

July

New

24 years

3.8 million

Sustainable urban development project: commercial, industrial and living zone. Private biomass and wood-energy electricity and heating network.

Industrial and Commercial Services  

Tour Granite, La Defense

December

New

4 years

4.95 million

Management of the new Société Générale Granite tower (70,000 m², 4,500 working stations, label HQE).

Rest of World (outside France)

Public/Local Authorities

Jiamusi, China

April

New

25 years

1 billion

Management of the leading heating network in China: 250,000 inhabitants, 5.5 million square meters of commercial and municipal buildings.

Industrial and Commercial Services  

Setra, Sweden

March

New

15 years

35.8 million

Construction and operation of a biofuel boiler providing hot water to a sawmill.

Bahrain Bay, Bahrain

March

New

25 years

215 million

Design, construction and management of a cooling network for a real estate project in Bahrain Bay.

Santa Casa de Misericordia Hospita, Brazil

May

New

15 years

186 million

Providing multi-technical services, management of utilities, management of the subcontracting of hospital security and catering services.


61 Revenues expected under foreign contracts won during 20052007 have been converted into euros at the rate of exchange prevailing on December 31, 20052007 and represent the portion due to Dalkia under such contracts.    Accordingly, these amounts may differ from the amounts announced in earlier press releases.  



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 1834



Back to contentsContents



Public Authority
or
Company and Location thereof

Month of Signature of Contract or of Renewal

New Contract or Renewal

Duration of Contract

Estimated Total Cumulative Revenue(in euros)

Services to be Provided

France

Public Authorities

CHU of Rouen

July

New

14 years

56 million

Production and distribution of heating and cooling for the hospital of Rouen using a co-generation facility. The heating and cooling network will also supply city housing and city hall.

Nimes

August

N/A

N/A

N/A

Sale of carbon dioxide emission quotas to finance the transition to natural gas of the heating networks in western Nimes.

Companies

Arjo Wiggins

July

New

12 years

135 million

Construction and operation of a 10 MW co-generation facility to furnish 340,000 tons of vapor per year.

Rodamco Europe in Lyon (manager of a shopping mall”La Part-Dieu” and the Crédit Lyonnais tower)

January

New

10 years

20 million

Supply of urban heating and cooling through the “Grand Lyon” network and of electricity to shopping mall “La Part Dieu.” Multi-technical maintenance for the Crédit Lyonnais tower.

Rest of World (outside France)

Public Authorities

European Parliament of Brussels

October

New

5 years

25 million

Technical maintenance of European Parliament building in Brussels.

University Campus of Canton

January 2006

New

2 years

2 million

Operation of air-conditioning system and hot water network.

Omskirk Hospital

February

New

30 years

60 million

Installation and operation of a new co-generation facility.

Region of Ligurie (Italy)

January

New

10 years

130 million for Siram (out of a total of 440 million)

Management of energy services for 30 hospitals in the Ligurie region (8,000 beds).

Lodz (Poland)

August

New

N/A

2004 Revenues: 167 million

Acquisition from the Polish Ministry of Finance of ZEC Lodz, the company that manages urban heating for the city of Lodz, as well as the production of heat and electricity through co-generation.

Cambridge, Massachusetts (U.S.)

September

New

N/A

Expected Revenue: 9 million per year

Acquisition of a steam distribution network in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Companies

Diageo (Runcorn, UK site)

May

New

15 years

45 million

Construction and operation of a new utility plant (vapor, compressed air, cooling, treated water, carbon dioxide).

Pfizer (Italy)

January

New

5 years

15.5 million

Global building management for Pfizer’s headquarters in Rome.

Liverpool Stores (Mexico)

January

New

5 years

17.8 million

Energy management and multi-technical operation of the group’s 17 department stores.

West Plaza Shopping Mall (Brazil)

October

New

7 years

12.95 million

Energy management and global building management for shopping mall.


Acquisitions and Divestitures in 20052007

In Latin America,2007, Dalkia ESexpanded in central Europe through various acquisitions including, among others, PannonPower in Hungary, whose central unit supplies the second largest heating network in the country; Rekotak in Slovakia, which manages thermal plants in a section of Bratislava under a 29-year contract, and Mexican group IGSA combined to form IGSA Solutions. the operator of the urban heating network and heat and electricity production of Varna, the third-largest city in Bulgaria.

In Chile,China, through the acquisition of a majority stake in YangGuang, Dalkia took controlover the construction and operation project relating to the “South West” heating network of Conade, thereby doubling the size of its business in this country. In Israel, Dalkia acquired Kalorit at the beginning of the year to form Dalkia Energies Services. In Poland, Dalkia acquired ZEC Lodz, the company that manages urban heating for the city of Lodz, as well asHarbin, the productioncapital of heatthe Heilongjiang province in northeast China, which has 9.5 million inhabitants.

At the end of 2007, our energy services division expanded to the United States through its acquisition of Thermal North America Inc., which has the leading portfolio of heating and electricity through co-generation. In Sweden, Dalkia reinforced its positioncooling networks in the industrial market by acquiring Unite. Finally, in 2005 Dalkia sold its facility management contracts in Germany as well as its nuclear maintenance activities in France.


United States.

In total, over the course of 2005,2007, Dalkia createdformed or purchased 4971 companies, and sold, liquidated or merged 2719 companies. As a result, as ofat December 31, 2005,2007, Dalkia held 387469 consolidated companies, of which 181 were non-French.including 242 foreign companies.


Transportation

Through our transportation division, Veolia Transportation,Transport, we are one of the world’s leading private operatorsoperator of public ground transportation.transportation in Europe. Veolia TransportationTransport operates road and rail passenger transportation networks under contractcontracts with national, regional and local transit authorities. Veolia TransportationTransport has been managing and operating urban, regional and inter-regional road and rail networks and maritime transport for more than a century, having won its first tramway concessions at the end of the 19th century.

Veolia TransportationTransport estimates that the portion of the worldwide transportation market presentlycurrently stands at €460 billion, of which only 15%, or approximately €70 billion, is currently open to competition stands at €50 billion, and that the portion not yet open to competition (thereby offering development potential) stands at €250 billion.competition.  The opening of transportation markets that has occurred over the past several years has been particularly pronouncedsignificant in Europe, but has occurred on other continents as well.

Moreover, the worldwide trend of population movement towards urban areas increases the need for collectivemass transportation services, thereby strengthening the market potential ofin areas that Veolia TransportationTransport seeks to service.

At the end of 2005,2007, Veolia TransportationTransport had approximately 72,30081,532 employees around the world.  It has a presence in 26more than 30 countries, and conducts its activity mainly in Europe.Europe, North America and Australia. While continuing to strengthen its position in France, Veolia Transportation benefits fromTransport has a strong presence outside of France as well, where it earns approximately 60%60.6% of its revenues. In 2005,2007, Veolia TransportationTransport pursued developmentits growth in North America and Europe.  

Veolia TransportationTransport estimates that it provided transportation to approximately 2.5more than 2.7 billion travelers in 2005,2006, and that it managed contracts with approximately 5,000 public authorities.

The following table shows the consolidated revenue and operating income of our transportation operations in each of the last two fiscal years,division, after elimination of all inter-company transactions.

(in millions of euro)

2005

2004

Change2005/2004

    

Revenue*

4,349.7

3,588.7

+21.2%

Operating income

114.1

31.4

+263.3%

*

Revenue from ordinary activities under IFRS.

Transportation

(in millions of euro)

2007

2006

Change

2007/2006

    

Revenue*

5,590.1

4,951.5

12.9%

Operating income

130.3

13.6**

858.1%

    

*

Revenue from ordinary activities under IFRS.

**

Includes the impact of an €86.5 million impairment charge relating to certain German activities.





VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 1935



Back to contentsContents


Overview of Transportation


Veolia TransportationTransport primarily operates road and rail passenger transportation networks under contracts won through auction withpublic bidding processes initiated by various public authorities.  The public authorities with which Veolia TransportationTransport contracts generally own the heavy infrastructure used by Veolia Transportation usesTransport, and typically establishset schedules, routes and fare structures for the networks that Veolia TransportationTransport operates and manages.   Veolia TransportationTransport primarily conducts its business through outsourced management of transportation activities under conditions and structures that differ from one country to another due to varying legal and regulatory requirements.  Each contract between a public authority and Veolia Transportation determinesTransport governs the relationships between the two parties, including payment to Veolia TransportationTransport and the risks to be borne by each party, and typically lasts for a setfixed period.  Because the fares Veolia TransportationTr ansport charges passengers on its transportation networks are usually insufficient to cover its costs, the public authority typically provides Veolia TransportationTransport with a payment or other compensation for services rendered. Moreover, in the case of certain contracts, Veolia TransportationTransport is paid a flat fee for its transportation services; consequently, it does not bear the risks associated with lower receipts or decreased passenger use (such contracts being referred to as “Public Market” contracts in France).  Veolia Transportation’sTransport’s management contracts generally last from 2 to 12 years, except for those that take the form of “operating concessions”, which last approximately 30 years on average.


Veolia Transportation’sTransport’s activities can be broken down into four principal categories: (i) cityurban mass transportation (urban urban beltwaytransport, suburban and other supplementary transportation services), (ii) intercity and regional transportation, (iii) passengerindustrial markets, and (iv) transportation management (passenger information services, clearinghouses and (iv) industrial markets.central telephone operators).


CityUrban Mass Transportation


Veolia TransportationTransport operates a number of bus networks, suburban trains, tramways and metros, and provides customized transportation services as well.  Veolia TransportationTransport is either partially or fullyentirely responsible for designing, planning and operating services, managing personnel, inspecting vehicles and stations it uses in its networks (including obtaining various permits), conducting marketing efforts and managing customer service.


In many urban areas, Veolia TransportationTransport provides interconnected bus, tramway, metro and train transportation services through a ticketing system coordinated by the principal transportation provider or transportation authority forwithin a given region.  Veolia TransportationTransport also offers special integrated transportation services within networks managed by several different operators in an urban area, including the suburbs of Paris Rouen, Saint-Étienne,suburbs, Stockholm, Sydney and Düsseldorf, among others.


Veolia TransportationTransport operates ferry-boatferry services to complementin tandem with its bus services in various urban areas.  It does so in Toulon (France) and Göteborg (Sweden), for example.


Urban and Urban BeltwaySuburban Transportation


In France, Veolia TransportationTransport operates the tramways, bus networks and light rail networks in Rouen, Saint-Etienne, Nancy, Nice and Bordeaux.  Veolia TransportationTransport is also the operator of the bus networks in, among others, Nice, Toulon (where tramway infrastructure is currently being installed as well) and approximately 40 other French cities.  Veolia TransportationTransport has a strong presence in the Ile-de-France region, where it operates numerous bus lines.lines in the inner and outer suburbs of Paris.  It is the main private operator in the region, operating the bus networks of Melun, Rambouillet, Argenteuil, St. Germain-en-Laye and Seine-Saint-Denis.


In Europe, Veolia TransportationTransport operates tramways and light rail networks in Görlitz and Berlin (Germany), Dublin (Ireland), Trondheim (Norway) and Norrköping and Stockholm (Sweden). Veolia TransportationTransport also operates the Stockholm metro, as well as bus lines in Scandinavia, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Czech Republic, Estonia and numerous cities in Poland.


Veolia Transportation operates transportation servicesIn southern Europe, until the sale by FCC-Connex of its Spanish bus subsidiary CTSA in several cities in Spain and Portugal throughNovember 2007, FCC Connex Corporación SL, which is jointly-ownedjointly owned by Veolia TransportationTransport and CGT (a subsidiaryFCC, combined the passenger transport activities of FCC).  Through this entity, Veolia Transportation operatesthe two companies in Spain.  FCC-Connex managed the urban and suburban transport services in several cities, including, among others, the Barcelona tramway and the urban transport network forof Jérez.  Veolia Transport operated the urban network of the city of Pampelune. Detren, Pamplona.  Following the sale, Veolia Transport intends to redevelop its activities in Spain through its wholly-owned subsidiary Veolia Transport España rail subsidiary of FCC Connex Corporación, is also a 10% shareholder of Tranvia de Parla SA, which in June 2005 was awarded the concession for operating the tramway in Parla (in the suburbs of Madrid) for a period of 38 years.SL.



36



Back to Contents


In the United States, Veolia TransportationTransport provides bus transportation services principally in California, Arizona, Nevada (Las Vegas), Colorado, Texas, Maryland and Virginia. Veolia TransportationTransport and its partners in the Massachusetts Bay Commuter Railroad Company (the Bombardier group and a local partner, ACI) manage suburban trains in the Boston area. Veolia TransportationTransport also manages suburban trains in Los Angeles (Metrolink).


In Canada, Veolia TransportationTransport provides transportation services in the southsouthern suburbs of Montreal, as well as bus services in York (Ontario) since September 2005.


In Australia, Veolia TransportationTransport operates the entire suburban rail network of Melbourne as well as the monorail and light rail network of Sydney.  It also operates bus services in Perth, Brisbane and Sydney. In New Zealand, Veolia TransportationTransport operates trains in the suburbs of Auckland.


In the rest of the world, Veolia TransportationTransport operates through partnership with other operators a high-frequency right-of-way bus system (BRT: Bus Rapid Transit) in BogotaBogotá (Colombia) and, a network of bus lines in IsraelSantiago (Chile) and Lebanon.three urban bus networks and inter-urban bus lines in Israel. In Israel,Jerusalem, Veolia TransportationTransport is also part of the consortium that has been awarded the concession for the operation of a future tramway of Jerusalem.tramway.


SupplementaryOther Transport Services


(transportation on demand, para-transport, taxis and more)

Veolia TransportationTransport offers innovative transportation services in certain cities that supplement traditional transportation networks.  For example, in France, Veolia TransportationTransport offers Créabus, an on-demand minibus service that is tracked by a Global Positioning System, or GPS, which operates in Dieppe, Montluçon, Vierzon, Bourges, Bordeaux, Ile-de-France and Fairfax (United States).  Veolia TransportationTransport also manages all of the on-demand transportation services in the NordNorth Brabant region ofand in Limburg in the Netherlands.


Veolia TransportationTransport manages taxi services in the Netherlands and the United States, in particular in Baltimore, Denver and Denver.Kansas City.  It provides transport for persons with reduced mobility in Bordeaux and other regions of France, in Canada and in the United States (“paratransit”), in particular in California, Arizona, Nevada, Texas, Maryland and South Carolina.  In addition, in 2007, Veolia Transport added bicycle transportation to its range of services.


Intercity and Regional Transportation


Veolia TransportationTransport provides regional transportation services through the operation of road and rail networks. As with urban transportation services, Veolia TransportationTransport is responsible for designing, planning, operating, maintaining and providing security on the vehicles and stations it uses in its regional networks, as well as for ticket sales and customer service.


Further, Veolia Transportation continues to develop ferry transport service in areas such as Finnmark and Norrland (Norway, since 2005) and Zeeland province (Netherlands).


In France, Veolia TransportationTransport has a strong presence in the intercity and student transportation markets, involving more than 60 French departments across the country.  Veolia TransportationTransport also operates a number of regional rail networks, covering approximately 850300 kilometers, through contracts with regional public authorities or sub-contracts with the Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer (SNCF), the French national railroad company, particularly in the regions of Brittany, Provence, the Alps and the French Riviera.  


In Europe, Veolia TransportationTransport has a strong presence in Germany, Denmark,with more than 3,000 kilometers of regional railway lines, the United Kingdom, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Slovenia, Slovakia, Belgium, Spain, the Czech Republic and the Netherlands.Netherlands and, since late 2006, Serbia and Croatia. Through Eurolines, a company in which Veolia TransportationTransport has had a 100% interest since March 2005, Veolia TransportationTransport provides transport by motorcoach on regular international routes serving over 1,500 cities throughout Europe.



In the United States, in the regional rail network sector, Veolia Transport operates Sprinter, in South Los Angeles, and Tri-Rail, a network in the suburbs of Miami.

Veolia Transport is continuing to develop ferry transport service in areas such as Finnmark and Norrland (Norway) and Zeeland province (Netherlands), as well as through its 28% shareholding in theSociété Nationale Maritime Corse Méditerranée (SNCM), which manages passenger and freight maritime transportation services between Marseille, Nice, Corsica and North Africa. Veolia Transport is a shareholder of SNCM alongside Butler Capital Partners (38%) and the French State (25%).  SNCM is fully consolidated in our consolidated financial statements.  This consolidation method was analyzed using the IAS 27 standard and reflects the rules of governance of SNCM.  Specifically, Veolia Transport appoints all of the members of SNCM’s management board (directoire), has broad operational and financial management powers and exercises control over SNCM within the meaning of IFRS.

VEOLIA

- Form 20-F | 20

37



Back to contentsContents



Passenger Information ServicesIndustrial Markets


In addition to the personnel transport services provided by its French subsidiaries, such as the Eurocopter site in Marignane, and those in the rest of Europe, Veolia Transport is present in two areas of industrial activity that represent nearly 4% of its revenues: rail transport (freight transport and management of industrial rail junctions and related logistics) and airport services.

Rail Transport

This activities in this sector are carried out in Europe through Veolia Cargo, assisted by specialized national subsidiaries in France, Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands.

In the area of freight transport, Veolia Transport operates a number of regional, national and international freight trains in France, the Netherlands and Germany.

In 2007, Veolia Cargo reinforced its position in Germany, developed its client portfolio in the French national market, and consolidated its development strategy in France and Germany.  Veolia Cargo also launched several container transport lines, thus solidifying its partnership with the ship owner CMA-CGM.  Another highlight of the year was the creation of subsidiaries in Belgium and Italy.

In addition, in the area of industrial rail junctions and related logistics, Veolia Cargo, through its subsidiaries in France and Germany, manages junctions for large industrial customers (in particular in the steel and refining industries), with factories that are linked to a national rail network.  

Airport Services

This activity covers a range of services for airline clients (freight transport at Charles de Gaulle airport, baggage handling, maintenance of vehicles, etc.). It is conducted by VE Airport, in whose capital  Veolia Transport holds a 60% interest.  Veolia Transport also manages passenger transport services inside airports.

Management of Airport Infrastructure

In the area of airport infrastructure management, Veolia Transport has been operating, maintaining and managing the public areas of the Nîmes-Garons airport (grounds, construction, building maintenance, and airline intake structures for passengers or freight), since January 1, 2007. This project represents a new air transportation infrastructure management business for the Group, which provides a total management solution for a site welcoming 250,000 travelers per year.

Transportation Management


Growth in Veolia Environnement’s transportationTransport’s business depends on increased use of public transportation networks, which in turn is closely related to the quality of serviceservices provided by these networks.  To increase passenger usage of its networks, Veolia Transportation’sTransport’s efforts focus on adequately matching service offerings with demand for thesesuch services, and developing local information services relating to transportation systems for travelers.


Accordingly, Veolia TransportationTransport has developed the “Optio” system, a service that provides complete information to anyone who wantswishes to use public transport inwithin a region (regardless of the operator) with the information that they need..  The service involves the use of a central telephone operator,call center, an internet site, wireless text messages, such as SMS, and wireless internet access, such as WAP.  The “Optio” system currently operates in the departmentFrench departments of Oise in France.


and Isère.  In addition, Veolia TransportationTransport has developed “Connector Plus”, a real-time information system installed in the rail network of Melbourne (Australia), which notifies users of service interruptions or delays through wireless text messages on their mobile phones.  Veolia TransportationTransport has also installed the “Connector Plus” system in Stockholm.


Stockholm as well.  In addition, Veolia TransportationTransport has also recently created several internet sitess ites that allow users to findprepare their itineraries onusing local transportation systems in France and Australia.


Industrial Markets


Beyond the personnel transport services provided by numerous subsidiaries in France and the rest of Europe, Veolia Transportation is present in two areas of industrial activity which represent nearly 4% of its revenues: rail transport (freight transport and management of industrial rail junctions with related logistics) and airport services. Veolia Transportation has created a dedicated subsidiary, Connex Industries (which became Veolia Cargo at the end of February 2006), for the purpose of grouping its European activities in these areas, as well as specialized national subsidiaries in France, Germany and the Netherlands.38



Rail Transport


In the area of freight transport, Veolia Transportation operates a number of regional freight trains in France under sub-contract with SNCF, and offers rail transport services for long distance freight in Germany through its subsidiary Connex Cargo Logistics GmbH. After the opening of the rail freight marketBack to competition in France, CFTA Cargo obtained its license as a rail freight operator and its first security certificate, allowing it to market itself directly to international clients, with services to be provided on rail freight corridors throughout Europe. Veolia Transportation obtained its own license as a rail freight operator in 2005.


In the area of industrial rail junctions and related logistics, Veolia Transportation manages junctions in France and Germany for large industrial customers (in particular in the steel and refining industries) with factories that are linked to a national rail network.  


Airport Services


This activity covers a range of services to airlines (freight transport on the platform of Charles de Gaulle airport, baggage handling, maintenance of vehicles, etc.). It is conducted by VE Airport, 60% of the share capital of which is owned by Veolia Transportation. Veolia Transportation also manages transport services within airports for airline passengers.


Veolia Transportation intends to develop its industrial market activities by relying on Veolia Environnement’s existing client network.  It will focus in particular on those industrial market activities that will help to enrich the Group’s offerings and constitute a growth area for Veolia Transportation.Contents


Description of Activities in 20052007


Veolia Transportation’sIn 2007, revenues in our transportation division increased by 21.2%12.9% compared to 2004,2006, due to strong growthan increase in France in the areas ofrevenues from urban and intercity passenger transport as well as growth abroad resulting from the full effectlatest developments in Europe.

On a commercial level, despite the non-renewal of a contract for the operation of the train line between Göteborg and Stockholm and the north of Sweden (the Norrland train) and a contract in Melbourne and recent developments inrelating to the United States (acquisitionoperation of ATC in particular).  


a portion of the Stockholm bus network (these contracts together representing less than 1.5% of Veolia Transportation renewedTransport’s revenue), 2007 saw the renewal or wonthe initial signing of a large number of medium-sized contracts, during 2005; noparticularly in Europe. For instance, 17 contracts for the operation of regional bus lines in Belgium were renewed, worth a combined estimated revenue of around €33 million.  The revenue represented by non-renewed contracts in 2007 is not significant contracts were lost.in comparison with total revenues in the transportation division.  The following were some of the highlights of 2005:


·2007:

In April 2007, in the Rhône department of France, Veolia Transport won the communityoperating contract for Leslys, the leading express railway link between the city and its airport, in a consortium that included Vinci, la Caisse des Dépôts, Vossloh and Cegelec. In maritime transportation, the operating contract for the transportation to the Morbihan Islands known as “îles du grand large” represents average annual traffic of Le Havre renewed itsapproximately 1,600,000 passengers.

In the United States, railway activities grew significantly in 2007. In addition to the renewal of the Boston contract with Veolia Transportationin December 2007, which is the contract for the operation of its urban transport networkthe largest suburban train in the American market, two new railway contracts were signed: the Tri-Rail contract in the south of Florida (a suburban train) began on July 1, 2007 for a periodterm of 67 years (estimatedand estimated total cumulative revenue of €200 million). This was the largest contract due to expire€43.2 million; in France during 2005;


·

Veolia Transportation won the firstAustin (Texas), a contract for private rail freight transport between France(this activity being sub-contracted to another operator) and Germany. The contracturban and suburban passenger transport with a five-year term was signedconcluded in April 2005August 2007 for a 5-year term (estimatedestimated total cumulative revenue of €10 million);


·approximately €73.5 million. The renewal of contracts with Boston and Las Vegas in January 2008 was a major success and strengthens the position of Veolia Transport in North America.

In Toulouse, France,India, a consortium in which Veolia Transport holds a 5% interest was awarded the city abandoned35-year concession contract (five years of which are dedicated to construction) for the competitive bidding process for a contract to manage its transport network, preferring to reassume direct management of services as of January 1, 2006;


·

Following a private tender offer, RTM (Régie des Transports de Marseille) chose Veolia Transportation to join a group that will consult on the construction, operation, and transfer of the first tramwaysubway line in Marseille.Mumbai (formerly known as Bombay). The private tender was launched by Marseille Provence Métropole in September 2005,operation and maintenance contract for this subway line, which is currently being negotiated between the company granting the concession and a contract wascompany whose majority shareholder is Veolia Transport, should be signed later that month.  RTM managesduring the urban transport networkfirst half of Marseille;


·

In Germany, Connex Cargo Logistics GmbH signed an agreement in January 2005 pursuant to which it now holds 65% of the company DE Transport GmbH, which provides rail freight transport for Thyssen-Krupp and for other industrial customers in the Dortmund port zone. Connex Cargo Logistics also acquired 19% of DE Infrastruktur (which is the owner of various infrastructure) pursuant to the same agreement. The annual revenues generated by these two different entities total approximately €25 million.


Finally, Veolia Transportation established a presence in Slovakia during 2005 and returned to the United Kingdom through its acquisition of Bebb Travel plc (bus activities).




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 21



Back to contents2008.


Principal Contracts

The following table shows the principal contracts signed or renewed in 20052007 with either public authorities or industrial or commercial companies71.


1 Revenues expected under foreign contracts won during 2007 have been converted into euros at the rate of exchange prevailing on December 31, 2007 and represent the portion due to Veolia Transport under such contracts.   Accordingly, these amounts may differ from the amounts announced in earlier press releases.  



39



Back to Contents





Public Authority

or

Company and Location thereof

Month of Signature of Contract or of Renewal

New Contract or Renewal

Duration of Contract

Estimated Total Cumulative Revenue(Revenue

(in euros)

Services to be Provided

France

     

Le HavrePublic Authorities

Lyon

DecemberApril

RenewalNew

630 years

200360 million

Operation of urban transporttramway network for the community of Le Havre.linking Saint-Exupéry airport to Lyon.

RoanneMorbihan Islands

November

New

7 years

37154 million

Operation of urban transport network forservice to the community of Roanne.Morbihan Islands.

Conseil Général des Cotes d’ArmorMarseille – Corsica

AugustJune

Renewal and expansionNew

106.5 years

80 million1.2 billion

Operation by SNCM of inter-urbanpassenger and freight maritime transport forbetween the Cotes d’Armor region.

Conseil Général de la Somme

August

Renewal

7 years

84.35 million

Operation of inter-urbancontinent and school transport in nine areas within the La Somme region (nine contracts total).Corsica.

Europe (outside France)

     

GermanyPublic Authorities

Norway

OctoberJune

Renewal

128 years

480 million1.3 billion

Rail servicesOperation of the public transport network in Lower Saxony.Finnmark.

GermanyNorway

JulyApril

NewRenewal

5.5 years

231 million

Operation of the public bus transport network in the Rogaland Province.

Holland

January

Renewal

7 years

42.7371 million

Rail services in the Haller Willem region.

Finland

December

Renewal and expansion

5 years (+ 2 year option)

31.5 million for 5 year-term

Operation of bus linesthe public transport network in the Helsinki region.Brabant.

North America

     

York (Canada)Public Authorities

March

New

5 years

53.75 million

Operation of express right-of-way bus network in York (suburbs of Toronto).

Denver (U.S.)Boston

MayDecember

NewRenewal

3 years (plus 2-year option)

21.6450 million (for 3 years)

Operation of a second bus networkpublic railway transportation network.

Rest of the World

Public Authorities

Melbourne

November

Renewal

1 year

368.5 million

Operation and maintenance of trains for Melbourne suburbs

Auckland

September

Renewal

2 years

52 million

Operation and maintenance of trains for the Auckland region.

Seoul

June

New

10 years

400 million

Operation of the 9-metro line which will open in the city of Denver (package 17).2009.



Acquisitions and Divestitures in 20052007


During 2005,In 2007, Veolia Transportation reorganizedTransport pursued its activitiesexpansion in Europe.  A “Central Europe”the Pacific zone was created throughwith the transferFebruary 2007 acquisition, of Connex Northern Europe AB’s (CNE) activitiesTransit First, which operates more than 80 buses in Central Europethe Sydney region. As a result of this acquisition, Veolia Transport has more than 420 employees and a fleet of 250 buses in Sydney, transporting approximately 11 million passengers per year. Veolia Transport also acquired Brookers, thereby strengthening its development in charter buses in Brisbane. Additionally, in November 2007, Veolia Transport acquired the Australian bus operator South West Coach Lines, which is the leading bus operator in the south-west portion of the country.  As a result of these three acquisitions, Veolia Transport has approximately 4,000 employees in Australia as well as a fleet of more than 1,000 vehicles that transport more than 200 million passengers per year.



40



Back to Connex Central Europe GmbH (CCE). CNE therefore transferred its Czech, Polish, SlovenianContents


In October 2007, Veolia Transport acquired the public transportation company People Travel Group, which operates mainly in Sweden but also in Russia, providing airport services as well as charter and Hungarian subsidiaries to CCE (and will soon dotourism services. This company, which has approximately 900 employees and 165 buses, generates annual revenue of approximately €63 million. Veolia Transport also acquired Värmlandsbuss, which operates in the same with its Slovakian subsidiary). German and Austrian subsidiaries are held by Connex Verkher GmbH (a direct subsidiarycounty of Värmland in Sweden.

On August 31, 2007, Veolia Transportation) and Swiss subsidiaries are held directly by Veolia Transportation; from an operating point of view however,Transport sold all of these subsidiaries depend on CCE.  

In March 2005,its interest in Veolia Transportation acquired the remaining 50% of the share capital of Eurolines that it did not already hold, for approximately €22.6 million.

In June 2005, Veolia Transportation sold its French subsidiary, CBM, which specializes in the purchase and resale of passenger transport vehicle parts. CBM was sold to the investment fund Natexis InvestissementTransport Danmark A/S. This company and its managing team, by way of a leveraged buy-out. The sale price wasfive subsidiaries, whose activities include public bus transport, have approximately €31.5 million.

In August 2005, Veolia Transportation acquired an 83.14% interest in the Norwegian company Helgelandske AS, for approximately €19.5 million.  An adjustment to the purchase price is currently being determined.

In September 2005, Veolia Transportation acquired the group ATC/Vancom, which operates regular bus lines, inter-regional transport lines1,600 employees and shuttle services in the United States.  The purchase price was approximately €77.7 million.operate more than 640 buses.

In total, over the course of 2005,2007, Veolia Transportation createdTransport formed or purchased 5755 companies, merged 20 companies, sold 238 companies, and liquidated 9or sold 18 companies.  As a result,At December 31, 2007, Veolia Transport included 528 consolidated companies, compared with approximately 520 as of December 31, 2005, Veolia Transportation held 455 consolidated companies (compared to 429 in 2004).2006.

Development of Synergies: Multiservice Contracts

to Benefit Industrial and Commercial Services Clients

Outsourcing and Multiservices Market

We believe that our position in the environmental services market for industrial and commercial services customers has allowed us to take advantage of the synergies that exist among our four divisions. The growthGrowth in this market, which is estimated to be greater than 10% per year, was initially driven bydue to the developmentexpansion of outsourcing, as industrial companies sought to outsource certain peripheralancillary activities to externalthird-party service providers.  This outsourcing trend coversapplies to all of our businesses, including energy services, water services, waste management services, on-site management of rail junctions and rail freight transport.

We offer a “multiservices”“multiservice” alternative to our customers, which involves the provision of services by several of our divisions under a single contract.  This allows usalternative improves our  ability to better respond tomeet the expectations of certain customers who wish to outsource a range of services to a single service provider.  This relationship also allows for greater technical synergies, economies of scale and mutual commercial complementarity.benefits.

Our largest multiservices contract, signed in 2003 with PSA Peugeot Citroën, providesis a good illustrationexample of the synergies that are possible.  The subsidiary created to service this contract, Société d’Environnement et de Services de l’Est, manages all environmental services at Peugeot’s sites in eastern France, involving more than twenty different activities. By delegating such a broad range of activities to us, PSA Peugeot Citroën is able to ensure the regulatory compliance of its sites, while realizing significant savings. These savings largely result from an overhaul of the previous organization and work plan, the implementation of skill training programs, the reassumedresumption of management of activities that were previously subcontracted, and the implementation of a new energy policy.  In 2005, the economic and operational success of this partnership led the PSA group to seek t he same scope of services from us for its new facility in Travna (Slovakia).

Our Organization for the Provision of Multiservices

ToIn order to develop this multiservices activity, we have established a specific organization, VEVeolia Environnement Industries (“VEI”), to coordinate our various activities.  While VEI plays a coordinatingsupervisory role, each of our divisions remains responsible for the ultimate performance of services falling within its area of expertise.

VEI preparesmanages our bids for multiservice contracts, withand a project manager from VEI is appointed for each multiservices contract.  Commercial projects and bids are prepared in coordination with our divisions, and are then submitted toreviewed by a commitments committee before their submission to clients.

Later,  Subsequently, the contract performance may be entrusted to anad hoc company formedperformed by a dedicated special purpose  entity managed in part by the divisions involved in the project, in particular whenif we decide to utilizework with the personnel of one of our industrial clients.

7 Revenues expected under foreign contracts won during 2005 have been converted into euros at the rate of exchange prevailing on December 31, 2005 and represent the portion due to Veolia Transportation under such contracts. Accordingly, these amounts may differ from the amounts announced in earlier press releases.  



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 22



Back to contents


client’s personnel.

Multiservices Business Activity

Our activities within the multiservices market are organized principally organized around eight12 major contracts, which together generate revenues of more than €300€437 million annually and are expected to generate total revenue over the life of such contracts in excess of €2.6€2.5 billion. The average length of these contracts is eight years.

The multiservices market has a strong international dimension, in particular with respect to our industrial clients, suchconstruction of new factories (known as Arcelor“greenfield” projects).  This was the case for, among others, ArcelorMittal in Brazil and PSA Peugeot Citroën in Trnava (Slovakia).



41



Back to Contents


Under a five-year multiservices contract with Renault signed in December 2006, (under which operations began in January 2007), we manage general and environmental services at all of Renault’s automobile construction sites in the Paris region (Boulogne-Billancourt, Guyancourt and Rueil-Malmaison). This contract relies on the expertise of our energy, environmental services and transportation divisions in order to provide a wide range of services at the 1 million m² site at which have soughtRenault employs more than 20,000 people.  This contract was signed with the objective of reducing expenditures by 20%. The range of services to construct new plants outsidebe provided includes the management of France.

Within France,electrical, heating and air conditioning equipment, waste management and disposal, management of open spaces and developed sites, logistics and transportation (including management of all employee vehicles and their garages, management of inventories and mail transport) as well as commercial services (such as the visitor reception area). This is our most significant multiservices contract is with PSA Peugeot Citroën.signed to date for commercial sites. It represents consolidated revenues of €600 million.  

We manage all the energy production and services for Socata, a subsidiary of the group EADS, at its Tarbes site. This contract involvesdraws on the provisionexpertise of several of our businesses. Work under this contract began in early 2007.  The range of services to be provided includes the production of gas, electricity and water for all of the buildings on site, as well as for industrial processes, including Lipofit2, a “clean” fuel. Also included are all services relating to the technical maintenance of the plant and buildings, environmental services for the site, and services for users including mail, caretaking, and reception.  This is a three-year contract that may be extended to PSA Peugeot Citroën’sfive years and represents estimated annual revenues of  €3.4 million.

On December 21, 2007, we renewed a multi-services contract with Novartis relating to Novartis’ site in Basel, Switzerland. The initial contract, which was signed in 2000 for a seven-year term was, at the time, the largest environmental services outsourcing agreement to be signed by an industrial company and allowed the integration of more than 300 Novartis employees within our company. Novartis, along with Ciba and Huntsman, which are located at the same sites, in Belchamp, Mulhouse, Sochaux and Vesoul. Environmentalrenewed their relationship with us by entering into this new seven -year contract representing combined annual revenues of  €140 million.  This contract, which represents cumulative revenue of close to €1 billion, is the largest contract we have signed with an industrial client. The services are to be provided cover the entire rangeby one of our abilities,subsidiaries, Valorec Services AG, at the sites of St Johann, Klybeck in Basel and include:Schweizerhall e. The scope of services, which is virtually unchanged, includes the management and maintenance of the energy production and distribution utilities, the solvent recycling plant (one of energythe largest sites in Europe), the incineration of hazardous materials and fluids, general and technical cleaning, operation of industrialoverall day-to-day waste channels, water treatment, management and disposal of empty containers, management of rail lines and locomotives, electricity distribution and management of technical equipment. Société d’Environnement et de Services de l’Est (SENSE), a joint subsidiary of our company and PSA Peugeot Citroën, is in charge of managing this 10-year contract signed in 2003 (estimated total revenue of more than €1 billion).

In 2005, we signed a new contract with PSA Peugeot Citroën to operate utilities, clean and treat waste and manage rail traffic at its new automobile manufacturing plant at Trnava in Slovakia (see table below). We also signed a 7-year contract at the end of 2005 with chemical group Schenectady, with estimated total revenue of approximately €14 million (see table below).responsibilities.

We continue to operateperform contracts previously entered into with ArcelorArcelorMittal (in Montataire-FranceMontataire, France and in Brazil), Novartis (in Basel-Switzerland), Futuroscope (in Poitiers-France)Poitiers, France), Visteon (in Germany) and, Corus Packaging (in the United Kingdom), PSA Peugeot Citroën (in Mulhouse, Sochaux, Vesoul and Belfort, France and in Trnava in Slovakia), and Schenectady (in Béthune, France).

Multiservices Contracts Signed in 20052007

We entered into the following multiservices contracts in 20052007 with industrial clients81:


Company

Location

Month of Signature of Contract

New Contract or Renewal

Duration of Contract

Estimated Total Cumulative Revenue

(in euros)

Services to be Provided

PSA
Peugeot
CitroënSocata (EADS)

Trnava
(Slovakia)Tarbes (France)

MarchJanuary

8New

3 years

6510 million

ProductionProvision of gas, electricity and distributionwater utilities for buildings and processes; use of energythe clean fuel “Lipofit2”; technical maintenance and fluids, management of industrial waste, general and technical cleaning, water treatment, electricity distribution and management of rail traffic.building maintenance; user services.

SchenectadyNovartis (CIBA, Huntsman)

Béthune (France)Basel (Switzerland)

December

Renewal

7 years

14980 million

ProductionManagement and maintenance of vaporenergy production and compressed air,distribution utilities; management of hazardous and non-hazardous waste andsolvent recycling installations; management of bio-station.the incineration of hazardous waste; day-to-day waste management.

1 Revenues expected under foreign contracts won during 2007 have been converted into euros at the rate of exchange prevailing on December 31, 2007.  Accordingly, these amounts may differ from the amounts announced in earlier press releases.  



42



Back to Contents


Competition

Most markets for environmental services are very competitive and are characterized by increasing technological challenges arising from regulatory changes in regulations, as well as the presence of experienced competitors.  

Competition in each of the markets we serve occursis primarily based on the basis of the quality of the products and services provided, and the supplier’s reliability, customer service, financial strength, technology, price, reputation and experience in providing services. Additional considerations include the ability to adapt to changing legal and regulatory environments, as well as the ability to manage employees accustomed to working for governmental authorities or non-outsourced divisions of industrial or commercial enterprises.  In each of the markets in which we operate, our competitive strengths are our high level of technological and technical expertise, our financial position, our geographical reach, and our experience in providing environmental management services, managing privatized and outsourced employees, and meetingour ability to comply with regulatory requirements.

With regard toIn the particular area of provision of environmental services to industry in particular, our main competitor isindustrial clients, Suez whichEnvironnement provides a range of services including energy, water and waste management.  The GDF-Suez merger and the anticipated listing of Suez Environnement do not significantly change the competitive position of Suez Environnement.  Certain actors in the industrial sector are also trying to enlarge the scope of their business to include the provision of environmental services. In particular, the subsidiaries of certain energy producers (such as Cofatech, a subsidiary of GDF, as well as subsidiaries ofand RWE) have been active in doing so. Companies specialized in electronic installation, such as Faces (a subsidiary of Cegelec) have also expanded their environmental services offering.  In the area of facilities management, companies such as Johnson Controls seek to provide multiservice offers to their commercial services clients.  Cleaning companies, such as ISS, are attempting to expand their offerings and to provide solutions outside of the cleaning business. Additionally, among new competitors, GE has announced its intention to develop its business within the water sector. However, the majority of competitors do not offer the same range of technical expertise in environmental services as we do. Therefore, in certain cases, our competitors are forced to set up ad-hoc arrangements to respond to clients’ demands.

We anticipateexpect that other enterprises that compete with usour competitors in individual sectors will, in the coming years, seek to expand their activities to become integrated environmental management services providers. This change has been prompted by the desire of potential clients to outsource a larger portion of their business.  Thus, companies with worldwide abilities have begun to respond to multi-site and multi-national calls for tenders, such as Jones Lang LaSalle in facilities management. Industrial services providers are also moving towards greater consolidation by creating multiservice subsidiaries, as is the case of Voith in Germany.


A new form of competition has developed over the last few years due to the growing role of financial groups such as infrastructure funds (such as Macquarie Bank) or private equity funds.  Although they are not global or strategic competitors, they are often present in privatization tenders and asset sales and can occasionally compete with us for growth opportunities.  The development of Public-Private Partnership (PPP) has also resulted in the appearance of new players from the construction sector who are capable of managing the significant construction and financing challenges imposed by these operations. Service providers like us may collaborate with these companies within the framework of groups formed to respond to calls for tender offers.  These include mainly Bouygues, Vinci and Eiffage.


It is important to note that our major competitor is often the client itself. Clients systematically compare the benefits and advantages of outsourcing to maintaining the status quo.

With regardrespect to the provision of environmental services to public authorities, there has been a tendency in France over the last few years to return the provision of such servicestowards returning to local government control, which has reduced the number of delegated management contracts available in the market. Nevertheless, this tendency has remained fairly limited. In Germany, theStadtwerke plays play a strongleading role in the environmental services market (in the areas of water, waste managementenvironmental services and energy services). In numerous countries in Eastern Europe, however, markets are slowly opening to competition, albeit partially.

Finally, new actors from the public works and building sectors may begin to offer services in the market following completion of large and/or extensive investments, which in turn require the provision of services (e.g., construction of a hospital which then requires ongoing maintenance of technical services). These new actors may provide services within the context of a BOT or concession contract or, in France, as part of a “partnership contract” authorized by a new regulation dated June 17, 2004. The emergence of such new actors is a natural outgrowth of a market in which ownership of infrastructure constructeddeveloped in order to support the provision of comprehensive environmental services often reverts back to the client at the endterm of a contract’s term.contract.  For the moment, however, these new actors have acted on a project-by-project basis, and do not seem to have a global strategy for establishing a true competitiveco mpetitive presence inon the market.



43



Back to Contents


Water

Through Veolia Eau, our principal international competitor in the water sector in 2007 was Suez Environnement (through its subsidiary Ondeo), which strengthened its position in Spain (by increasing its stake in Agbar and investing in the capital of Aguas de Valencia following the repurchase of the interest previously held by SAUR). RWE, which in 2006 had announced a reorganization process in order to focus on its energy businesses, sold Thames Water Holdings plc, the most significant water management company in Great Britain, to the consortium Kemble Water Limited, managed by Macquarie, in 2007. After this announcement in March 2006, the initial public offering of its American subsidiary American Water was postponed.

In the North African, Middle Eastern, Chinese and Indian markets, Veolia Eau competes with Asian companies (Singaporean companies, such as Hyflux and Asia Environment, and Japanese companies, such as Marubeni and Mitsui) and Spanish companies from the building and public works sectors (Acciona, Aqualie-FCC, ACS), but also with conglomerates, particularly General Electric and Siemens, which have demonstrated their international ambitions in water treatment technology.

At both the national and regional level, Veolia Eau faces a number of local competitors, including public companies and local mixed public-private companies such as Acea and Amga in Italy, Gelsenwasser in Germany (which entered the French market through the purchase of an interest in the capital of Nantaise des Eaux), Canal Isabel II in Spain, public enterprises in Brisbane, Australia or semi public entities (régies départementales)in France.

In addition, investment funds and other pension funds seeking stable revenues (Hastings Funds Management, Macquarie, JPMorgan, Canadian Pension Fund) made significant investments in regulated water assets in Britain (South East Water, Thames Water, Southern Water) and Chile (Ontario Teacher’s Pension Plan with Essbio and Aguas Nuevo).

Environmental Services

Through Veolia Propreté, our principal competitors in the water sector in 2005 were Suez (through its subsidiary Ondeo) and RWE. In November 2005, RWE announced that it would seek to sell its interests in two of its main subsidiaries: Thames Water in the United Kingdom and American Water in the United States. On the other hand, General Electric (through Ionics) and Siemens (through Siemens Water Technologies) have announced their ambition to establish a presence in India, China and the Middle East in the area of water treatment technology.

At both national and regional levels, Veolia Water has a number of local competitors, particularly in the building and public works sectors. Examples of such competitors include Saur in France, FCC (which is pursuing further development internationally), and Agbar in Spain. In the United States, competitors include American Water (a subsidiary of RWE) and United Water (a subsidiary of Suez).  In Asia, various conglomerates (Marubeni, Mitsui, Kerry Utilities, Cheung Kong Infrastructure) have attempted to form partnerships in order to conduct water activities. Further, Veolia Water faces competition locally from public establishments and local mixed public-private companies.

Waste Management

Through Veolia Environmental Services, our principal competitors in the waste managementenvironmental services sector are either solely regional, or they cover only one part of the sector in which Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté operates.

In Europe, where Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté conducts the majority of its waste management activities, and in the PECO zone, the principal competitor is Suez Environnement, acting through its subsidiary SITA.SITA, Remondis, FCC and Biffa.

Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté may expand further in North America as well, where its principal competitor is Waste Management.

8 Revenues expected under foreign contracts won during 2005 have been converted into euros at the rate of exchange prevailing on December 31, 2005.  Accordingly, these amounts may differ from the amounts announced in earlier press releases.  



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 23



Back to contents


Management, along with Allied Waste and Republic Services.

In Latin America, Veolia Environmental Services’Propreté’s operations are concentrated in Brazil and Mexico, where it competes primarily competes with Suez Environnement and a variety of local companies.

In the Asia/Pacific region, Veolia Environmental Services’Propreté’s main competitors are Cleanaway and Suez Environnement (acting through SITA), as wellas various local companies.  The Australian group Brambles (operating under the Cleanaway brand) has withdrawn from the waste management business.

Energy Services

TheCombining diverse services and different types of market participants, the energy services market has many actorspresents us (through our energy services division, Dalkia) with strong competition, posed by sector-specific companies. Only two companies, Elyo (Suez) and we, through our division Veolia Energy Services (Dalkia), therefore face very dispersed competition. We believe that the only three companies with aCofatech (GDF) have strong international presencepresences and a diversified and complete range of services in this market similarservice offer comparable to our own presenceours.  Among sector-specific companies, Dalkia competes against large local competitors with active presences, such as ENEL, Vattenfall, Fortum, ATEL and services are Suez (Elyo), RWE and Cofatech (GDF).EON.

In the commercial services sector, competition takes many forms, and comes from specialized companies (in the areas of cleaning restoration, etc.)and food services, for example) seeking to expand their offering to include multi-technical services, and from technical maintenance companies focusing on electronic installationtechnical maintenance such as electrical installation.

In addition, we face growing competition from municipally- or publicly-run companies, principally in particular.Central Europe, Germany, Austria and Italy.



44



Back to Contents


Transportation

Through Veolia Transportation,In transportation, our principal competitors in the transportation market are large private operators, primarily French, American or British, and public monopolies that conduct their activities in open markets.companies (national or local) operating public monopolies. Our principal private operator competitors at the international level are the British groups First Group,FirstGroup, National Express, Stagecoach, Arriva and Go Ahead, and French groups Kéolis (which counts thehas SNCF as an industrial partner and shareholder, though 53% of its share capital is held by 3i, an investment fund) and Transdev (a subsidiary of the Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations, which has an alliance with the French metro operator, RATP). FirstGroup is the world’s largest group for public and private transportation. Among Veolia Transportation’sTransport’s largest public competitors are Deutsche Bahn (the national rail operator in Germany) and, in France, the RATP and SNCF.  

In North America, the transport company MVcompetitive market has adopted an aggressive pricing strategy that now positions itevolved, particularly as a competitor, along with Veolia Transportation’s historical competitors in the market that include Laidlaw and the subsidiariesresult of the British groups First Group, National Express and Stagecoach.purchase of Laidlaw by FirstGroup.  In the area of rail transport, Amtrak’s persistent budget difficulties have further opened the market to delegated private management.

In Asia, we anticipate that groups in China (Hong Kong) and Singapore may in the long-term becomecompanies with international objectives constitute new competitors in an increasingly dynamic transportation market.the European and Asian markets. These companies include, in particular, ComfortDelgro, the transport network operator in Singapore, 40% of whose revenue come from international business, especially in China and the United Kingdom, and MTRC, the subway operator in Hong Kong, which participated in several calls for tenders for railways in Asia and Europe.

Contracts

We provide a range ofOur activity is focused on providing services either directly to the customer making the request—for example,public, usually in connection with an outsourcing agreement we havea contract with a public authority or industrial or commercial company—or indirectly on behalf of such customerentity responsible for the benefit of a third party—service—for example, in connection with the delegated public service management of a drinking water production and distribution service or management of an urban heating and cooling network.network—or to the contractual counterparty directly, which may be a public entity or an industrial or tertiary enterprise (such as an outsourcing contract).  Increasingly, the assignments involve the development and building, as well as financing, if needed, of facilities and the work necessary for the operation. This tendency is a natural result of increasingly stringent requirements relating to environmental and economic efficiency and the significant awareness that this efficiency requires equipment and work, which from the beginning take operational concerns into account. Budgetary constraints placed upon public finances in a number of countries are also a factor. All of the contracts signed with public entities are global assignments involving conception, construction, financing and management, which are sometimes called PPP by extension. Contracts can normally be distinguished based on their legal status and according to whether the person receiving the service from the company is a public or private person seeking assistance in its activities, or whether the public is paying directly for at least part of the costs.  The services we provide are often vast and multi-functional, requiring adequate employee infrastructure and specialized resources. They may also require management of works or infrastructure that are technically complex—an example would becomplex, such as a wastewater treatment network and purification plant or an industrial co-generation facility.  These works or infrastructure projects may either be provided by the client, or we may finance and build the infrastructureinfrastruct ure ourselves.

Our global management services to the public entities provided on behalf of public authorities include water distribution, wastewater treatment, collection and treatment of household waste, public transport, production and distribution of heating and cooling through urban networks and energy services.  In numerousmany countries, the provision of such services, often referred to as general economic interest or public services, is considered to be the responsibility of the local public authority. Accordingly, the public authority is charged not only with implementing regulations or controls over the provision of public services, but must also implicate itself more directly in their management, through one of the following means:  

-

the public authority can decide to directly manage and provide public services on its own (“direct” or “internal” management), thereby limiting the number of projects granted to private operators like us and leading most often to shorter-term contracts, or

-

the public authority may prefer to confer on a third party the entire responsibility for providing the public services, in which case the latter, depending on the specifications of the contract, would be responsible for providing the human resources, materials and finances necessary to provide the services.necessary.  The public authority may also request that the third party finance and constructbuild any required infrastructure under the contract. Third parties to whom the public authority resorts may be either private operators, mixed public-private companies  or other public entities.

Based on the different ways inmeans by which public authorities choose to manage the provision of public services, we have developed various types of contracts to respond to their specific requirements.  The contracts we employ generally fall into one of twothree categories, depending on whether we are entrusted with total responsibility for provision of a public service and whether we have a financial and commercial relationship with the end users:

-

45



Back to Contents


the public authority chooses to directly manage and provide public services on its own (direct management), but has only limited means and therefore calls upon a private operator to provide certain limited services or works, to whom it pays a set price under contract.  Alternatively,

the public authority may prefer a more expansive contract involving construction and management of services, which may include the financing of required infrastructure.  These are known as public market contracts under municipal law, also referred to as Build, Operate, Transfer contracts, (for example, a contract for building, financing and operating a water purification plant), or from now onsince 2004 in France as “partnership contracts”, or

-

the public authority entrusts a company with the responsibility for the full provision of a service, with the latter assuming all or part of the operational risks. Generally, the provision of the service is then financed by the end user of the service. The contractor is thus responsible for and free to implement the means necessary to provide the service, but must do so in accordance with the terms set by the public authority in respect ofbased on expected performances and prices charged to end users. This is the logic of “delegated management” or “concession” in a global sense (also known as a PPP), “concession” and Build, Own, Operate contracts, under which means the entity that assumes management also assumes the “risks and perils” or “risks and advantages” to the extent its compensation is substantially a function oflinked to its operating results.

In certain countries, public authorities may also choose to be involved as little involved as possible in the provision of public services to inhabitants, choosing instead onlyor to regulatebe satisfied with the activitiesmore or less restrictive regulation of the private provider.relevant activities. This creates opportunities for us as well, most often through acquisition of the private operator that is already serving a given region.

The general type of contract we employ in a given instance does not in itself determine the specific operating conditions under which we provide our services.  Further, such contracts are subject to various nuances.  Under our delegated public service management contracts, for example, even though we are generally paid by the end users of the service, we sometimes receive compensation by the public authority as well. This can occur in the case of a management contract that provides for variable compensation by the public authority, based on the fulfillment of specific targets by the private operator.area.

The historic traditions of the various countries in which we operate tend to favor one of the above-mentioned general contract types over the other.  In France, for example, where there is a long tradition of granting concessions and delegated public service management contracts are often the preferred choice.  

At the same time, France has adopted a new regulation dated June 17, 2004 that permits the development of  “partnership contracts”. This new legal form of contract allows a public authority to entrust a private operator with full management of public services, including construction and financing.  The private operator is then compensated by the public authority following completion of various agreed upon performances.

Current practices in various countries have tended to converge, with public authorities resorting to one or the other contract types depending on the situation.  All such contracts have, in most cases, the common feature of being long-term agreements.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 24



Back to contents


We also enter into outsourcing contracts for the management of complex services with our industrial and commercial services clients, which are analogous to the contracts entered into with public authorities above.

Despite differences related to the nature of clients, the services contracted for and the nature of the legal systems in which we operate, the expectations of our clients have tended to converge towards (i) a demand for transparency during the bid process and during contract performance, (ii) formation of a real partnership in search of ways to improve productivity and performance, and (iii) a desire for clear performance targets and variable compensation depending on achievement.

We are also very attentive to contractual provisions, in particular when we must finance the investments called for under a contract. Given the complexity of management agreements and their generally longer term, we possess skills regarding contract analysis and control.  The legal departments of our divisions are involved in the preparation of contracts, and controls are imposedcarry out verifications on the implementation of our main contracts.  Each year, our internal audit department includes a review of the contractual and financial stakes of our most significant contracts in its annual program.

We believe that our activities are not materially dependent on any one industrial, commercial or financing contract. We also believe that we are not materially dependent upon any particular contract or customer.

Environmental Regulation, Policies and Compliance

Environmental Regulation

Our businesses are subject to extensive, evolving and increasingly stringent environmental regulations in developing countries as well as in the European Union and North America.  On April 21, 2004, the European Union adopted a directive concerning environmental responsibility that has been transposed, or is in the process of being transposed, by member states. This text sets forth the principle of operators’ civil liability for any serious damage to protected species and natural habitats and any damage to the water and soil, excluding persons and property. This potential liability encourages the implementation of preventive measures. In addition, the REACH regulation on chemicals, which has been in force since June 1, 2007, has established a new European methodology for the management of chemicals that is designed to enhance knowledge of the substances that are currently circulating within t he European market. This has particular implications for us as users of such substances, in particular the importance of cooperation and exchange of information with suppliers.

Water

Water and wastewater services activities are highly sensitive to governmental regulation. In Europe and North America, governments have enacted significant environmental laws at the national and local level in response to public concern over the environment. The quality of drinking water and the treatment of wastewater are increasingly subject to regulation in developing countries as well, both in urban and rural areas.



46



Back to Contents


The quality of drinking water is strictly regulated at the European Union level by Directive 98/83/EC of November 3, 1998, relating to the quality of water destined for human consumption, which was transposed into EU member states and French law by a decree on December 20, 2001 (certain provisions of which have also been incorporated into the French public health code). This directive introduces, beyond quality control, the concept of evaluating risks on an ongoing basis. The collection, treatment and discharge of urban, industrial and commercial wastewater is governed by Directive 91/271 of May 21, 1991, the objectives of which were further reinforced and expanded by water Directive 2000/60/EC of October 23, 2000. Public authorities also impose strict regulations upon industrial and commercial wastewater that enters collection systems and the wastewater and sludge from urban wastewater treatment plant s.pl ants.  Directive 2006/118/CE of December 12, 2006 concerning the quality of ground water provides for oversight and a limit regarding the amount of chemical substances in water by 2015.  In France, regulations concerning water destined for human consumption were revised, resulting in new water quality limits and references. For installations serving more than 10,000 inhabitants, the person responsible for the water distribution must prepare a study concerning the vulnerability of water fixtures to malicious acts. In establishments where water is provided to the public, it is the responsibility of the person in charge of the establishment (and no longer that of the public service provider) to ensure that the water is fit for consumption.

Public authorities also impose strict regulations concerning industrial wastewater likely to penetrate collection systems, as well as wastewater and mud originating in urban used water treatment installations.

France has numerous laws and regulations concerning water pollution, as well as numerous administrative agencies involved in the enforcement of those laws and regulations. Certain discharges, disposals, and other actions with a potentially negative impact on the quality of surface or underground water sources require authorization or notification. For instance, public authorities must be notified of any facility that pumps groundwater in amounts that exceed specified volumes and French law prohibits or restricts release of certain substances in water. Individuals and companies are subject to civil and criminal penalties under these laws and regulations.  The law relating to water and aquatic environments of December 30, 2006 addresses community demands for high quality water and significantly modifies the French legislation on water, also addressing community objectives concerning water quality unti l 2015.

In the United States, the primary federal laws affecting the provision of water and wastewater treatment services are the Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 and related regulations promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). These laws and regulations establish standards for drinking water and liquid discharges. Each U.S. state has the right to establish criteria and standards stricter than those established by the EPA and a number of states have done so.

Waste ManagementEnvironmental Services

In numerous countries, waste treatment facilities are subject to laws and regulations that require us to obtain permits to operate most of our facilities from governmental authorities. The permitting process requires us to complete environmental and health impact studies and risk assessments with respect to the relevant facility. Operators of landfills must provide specific financial guarantees (which typically take the form of bank guarantees) that cover in particular the monitoring and recovery of the site during, and up to 30 years after, its operation.  In addition, landfills must comply with a number of standards, and incineration plants are usually subject to rules that limit the emission of pollutants. Waste may also be subject to various regulations depending upon the type of waste. For example, sludge produced at wastewater treatment stations that will be composted must comply with strict regulationsr egulations relating to its content of organic materials and trace metals (heavy metals like cadmium, mercury or led). Further, the NFU 44-095 standard, established in 2002 and henceforth applicable in France, strictly regulates the composting of material that results from the treatment of wastewater.

In France, pursuant to the provisions of the Environment Code (Code de l’environnement) (articles L. 511-1etseq.) relating to registered installations for the protection of the environment, several decrees and ministerial and administrative orders establish rules applicable to landfills for household, industrial, commercial and hazardous waste. These orders govern, among other things, the design and the construction of waste treatment centers. Hazardous waste is subject to strict monitoring at all stages of the treatment process. Waste-to-energy centers are subject to numerous restrictions, including in particular limitations on the amount of pollutant emissions: for example, directive 2000/76/EC of December 4, 2000 on the incineration of waste fixes emission thresholds for dioxins and NOX in particular. In connection with the application of this directive in France, conformityco mpliance studies were submitted to local Fren chFrench authorities in charge of the supervision of each relevant installation in June 2003, in order to determine the necessary corrective measures to be implemented by the end of 2005.



47



Back to Contents


At the European Union level, the framework for waste management regulation is provided by directives that set overall regulatory goals of waste prevention, collection, recycling and reuse. European Union member states are required to prohibit the uncontrolled discarding, discharge and treatment of waste pursuant to these directives. Several existing European regulations seek to have member states define a national strategy that allows for the progressive reduction of dumping of biodegradable waste. The regulations are intended to promote recycling, composting and energy recovery of household waste. Further,

With respect to the transportation of waste across national borders, the regulation of June 14, 2006 concerning the transfer of waste entered into force in July 2007.  This text sets forth the terms of the supervision and monitoring of waste transfers and simplifies and defines the current procedures for the supervision of waste transfers for non-hazardous, recyclable waste.

In addition, the European Union has, through directive 2003/87/EC of October 13, 2003, implemented a quota system for the emission of greenhouse gases targeting carbon dioxide in particular. Our waste management business is excluded from the first phase (2005-2007) of this directive, but may be targeted subseque ntly,subsequently, and may as a result establish procedures to reduce methane and carbon dioxide emissions.

The major statutes governing our waste management activities in the United States include the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, the Clean Water Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (also known as “CERCLA” or “Superfund”), and the Clean Air Act, all of which are administered either by the EPA or state agencies to which the EPA delegates enforcement powers. Each state in which we operate also has its own laws and regulations governing the generation, collection and treatment of waste, including, in most cases, the design, operation, maintenance, closure and post-closure maintenance of landfills and other hazardous and non-hazardous waste management facilities.

Energy Services

Our energy-related activities in Europe (primarily the supply of energy services involving thermal and independent energy) are subject to directives and regulations that seek to control environmental impact and risks. One such directive of October 23, 2001 establishes emission limits for sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and dust and regulates the construction of large combustion plants. It requires the implementation of national emission ceilings for certain atmospheric pollutants such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and volatile organic compounds.

Since the end of 2007, the IPPC directive of September 24, 1996 regarding the “integrated prevention of pollution” is fully applicable. The directive requires a number of European industrial facilities, including large combustion facilities, to obtain licenses authorizing their operations, to be renewed periodically, and based, as much as possible, upon the techniques having the least amount of environmental impact, that is, “the best techniques available”.

European regulation 2037/2000/EC of June 29, 2000 sets a timetable for the elimination of substances that destroy the ozone layer, in particular refrigerating fluids such as chlorofluorocarbon and hydro chlorofluorocarbon that are used in cooling plants.

As a result of the Kyoto Protocol, European regulation 842/2006/CE of May 17, 2006 imposes rigorous confinement and traceability measures for greenhouse gases, both for HFC refrigerating liquids or SF6 electrical insulators.

With respect to European directive 2003/87/EC of October 13, 2003 on greenhouse gases and carbon dioxide quotas, the energy services’ combustion installations of more than 20 MW have been part of the national plans of EU member states for the allocation of quotas since February 2005.   

European directive 97/23/EC of May 29, 1997, aimed at harmonizing member state legislation in the area of pressure equipment, imposes various security requirements for the design and manufacturing of such equipment, and requires that it be inspected for proper use.

With respect to European directive 2003/87/EC of October 13, 2003 on greenhouse gases and carbon dioxide quotas, Dalkia’s combustion installations of more than 20 MW have been part of the national plans of EU member states for the allocation of quotas since February 2005.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 2548



Back to contentsContents


Finally, with respect to its production of sanitary hot water, Dalkia is directly affected by European directive 98/83/EC of November 3, 1998, which addresses the quality of water destined for human consumption. Eighteen states, including France, believehave taken the position that this directive applies to cold and to hot water and to all types of management systems for production and distribution.

All of the directives and regulations mentioned above have been subsequently implemented in each member state of the European Union. In France, this primarily means compliance with a July 19, 1976 law and its implementing decrees relating to the environmental protection of designated installations. Under this law, Dalkia must obtain various permits and authorizations from regulatory authorities in order to operate its facilities, and ensure that its operations comply strictly with the terms of such permits. For large combustion installations (output greater than 20 MW), new regulations were imposed in 2002 (for new installations) and in 2003 (for existing installations) with respect to emission limits, in application of European Union directive 2001/80/EC of October 23, 2001.

With regard to pressure equipment, directive 97/23/EC of May 29, 1997 (which applies to material constructed since 2002) has modified the regulatory regimes of member states in relation to procedure and inspection, and has helped to harmonize the operation of all installations that use such equipment.  In France, a decree of March 15, 2000, as modified by a more recent decree of March 30, 2005, has transposed this directive into national law.

In relation to managing the risk of legionnaire’s disease, the European Working Group for Legionella Infections (EWGLI) has, with the support and approval of the European Commission, published new European guidelines for the control and prevention of travel associated legionnaires’ disease. In general, texts on the issue are issued in Europe and around the world by public health authorities and associations for the protection of travelers. Very often, these texts are presented in the form of recommendations for prevention, which take into account the physico-chemical and biological nature of water and prescribe corrective actions when certain indicators are present. Various professional associations have also issued their own guidelines for prevention.

In France, the health ministry has recommended, since 1997, that health professionals and managers of establishments implement best practices for the maintenance of sanitary hot water networks, air climate systems and other installations at risk. In December 2004, there were also newly issued guidelines for the design and operation of cooling facilities using vapor processes (cooling towers).

In Spain, decree (real decreto) 865/2003 of July 4, 2003 establishes criteria for the quality of water and the frequency of inspection procedures, as well as for when action must be taken once certain limits are exceeded. A Spanish association has issued a guide on the subject (100030IN). In the United Kingdom, an approved code of practice (ACOP L8) issued by the Health and Safety Executive is the authoritative text, which has also inspired similar procedures in Belgium, the Netherlands, Ireland and at EWGLI.  In the United States, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) issues its own guidelines and action plans. The American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) and the Cooling Technology Institute (CTI) have issued guidelines as well. Italy and Portugal have partially adopted the ASHRAE guidelines relating to the protection of tourists.tourists .

Transportation

Our transportation service activities are subject to a number of national and European regulations and particularly European Union directives that limit emissions from petrol and diesel engines and require us to obtain certain permits.

In the European Union, standards called “EURO” have been established for polluting emissions from thermal engines. All new vehicles currently constructed in the European Union are in compliance with “EURO 3”4” standards and Veolia Transportation’sTransport’s networks are renewing their fleets with “EURO 3”4” or “EURO 5” vehicles. In 2005, a2006, the “EURO 4” standard took effect with even stricterstrict requirements for the reduction of polluting emissions.

Further, Veolia TransportationTransport has made a commitment, in connection with its environmental management system, to lower its total emissions globally and to prepare for the new standards by testing and experimenting with emission reduction systems which will eventually be sold, thereby reaffirming its role as expert and consultant to client collectivities.

Finally, Veolia TransportationTransport is subject to the environmental standards applicable to depots, garages and underground cisterns whose activities may present a danger or inconvenience to the environment.  For this reason, the majority of sites in France are subject to the regulations governing classified facilities for the protection of the environment, more generally in the form of a simple notification.notification regime.

Finally, in France, the law of February 11, 2005 relating to equal treatment and opportunities for the disabled provides that all public transport must be accessible to handicapped persons within 10 years.



49



Back to Contents


Environmental Policies

We strive to contribute to the enhancement of quality of life in places where we operate, and have placed the challenges of sustainable development at the heart of our strategy.  To this end, we dofocus not focus only on the preservation of the environment and the protection of natural resources and biodiversity, but also assume our economic and social responsibilities, particularly at a local level where we are committed to stimulating progress.

Our action regarding greenhouse gases

An increase in greenhouse gases in the atmosphere has led certain countries, as well as the international community, to implement regulatory measures in order to limit this trend.  At the international level, the Kyoto Protocol, finalized in 1997, came into force in February 2005. At the European level, the European Union has decided to implement a quota exchange system for carbon gas emissions, through Directive 2003/87/EC of October 13, 2003.  This system has been in place since the beginning of 2005.

We are already active in this field at the European Union level and internationally, as well as at the national level.

At the European Union level, all large combustion installations with thermal output greater than 20 MW fall under the new quota exchange system. For us, this primarily affects our energy services division, which manages almost 73,000 such installations in Europe (i.e., more than 2% of total installations). Quotas awarded to Dalkia represent approximately 1% of all European quotas awarded. Dalkia has worked to help keep carbon dioxide emissions within quota limits, and has established an adapted organization and created a dedicated legal structure, VEETRA, whose purpose it is to purchase, sell and recycle different kinds of greenhouse gas quotas.  These initiatives have allowed us to be an early participant in the quota exchange market, and through our participation we have optimized the profitability of our contracts and in some cases assisted clients in financing new investments that help to reduce greenhou se gas emissions. Some of Veolia Eau’s sites in Germany have also been affected, following its securing of certain municipal contracts (Stadtwerke).

At the international level (Kyoto Protocol), we have begun trying to generate emission credits that would be tradable on the market, by participating in projects with other countries that help to reduce greenhouse gases. Veolia Propreté and Veolia Énergie (Dalkia) have already tested this in practice, through projects in Brazil and Egypt, along with six other South American projects.  Dalkia has also enacted a joint project in Lithuania. By using dedicated teams, Dalkia and Veolia Propreté intend to pursue this activity in the future.  Regarding transportation services, the first challenge in reducing greenhouse gas emissions is to establish reliable measurement tools.  Veolia Transport is actively involved in developing an initial tool that would apply to business transportation, in collaboration with EpE and ADEME.

At the national level, a number of countries have designed mechanisms to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, either in the form of a set of targeted incentives (as France has done under itsPlan Climat) or in the form of “domestic projects” that allow selected projects to benefit from emission credits (as New Zealand, Canada, Australia, and some U.S. states have done). The latter is currently being studied by France as well. Our teams are following all of these developments and attempting to integrate them into their planning.

Direct greenhouse emissions on sites that we managed in 2007 reached 42.8 million tons of CO2 (carbon dioxide) equivalents (compared to 36.5 million tons in 2006).

We are generally contributing to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, both through the daily management of sites that it operates and through the use of renewable and alternative energies (in particular biomass, landfill gas, geothermal energy).  We are actively following regulatory developments that will undoubtedly become more restrictive in the future, viewing them as new opportunities to develop our environmental management skills.

Preserving ecological balances

Whether through the limitation of water evaporation, the enhancement of the quality of our waste, the effort to optimize energy consumption in connection with our water distribution and treatment activities, the use of alternative energies in our heating operations, the recovery and treatment of biogas emissions at our landfills or the use of low-emission fuels in our fleet of public or private transport vehicles, we get involved in the main environmental problems currently affecting our planet by applying our know-how, technological capabilities and research potential to these problems. We contribute to the enhancement of quality of life and sanitary conditions of local populations in our day-to-day operations. For example, by supplying drinking water to impoverished areas we help to reduce infant mortality. In developed countries we have implemented plans to protect against the risk of the presence o f legionella in public or industrial facilities, thereby improving public sanitation.  



50



Back to Contents


Preserving economic and social balances

We also consider the economic and social factors that underlie the course of development in the countries in which we operate, and we work to develop solutions that are adapted to local constraints and know-how transfers. For example, we have instituted a program in Shanghai to educate employees about safety at work. In Romania, Alexandria and Gabon, we have developed programs that have allowed local employees and consumers to better understand the challenges in the provision of water and waste management services. We give preference to a partnership approach with non-governmental organizations (NGOs), local authorities and associations in the implementation of action plans for the population of emerging countries, which permits the development of model plans that can be reproduced.  In each of our projects, we seek to create a beneficial and educational dimension for the improvement of public hea lth and the protection of the environment. We also try to assist in the development of areas where we provide services. In this regard, a new partnership agreement was entered into in 2005 relating to the World Hunger Program. Under this partnership, our teams present in Nigeria will work to improve the access of elementary schools to water and wastewater treatment services.

Moreover, we continue to participate in an initiative for developing a charter on public-private partnerships (PPP) in order to improve public access to essential services, which is being supported by the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs and pursued by several agencies of the United Nations. We testified as to best practices in this area during a meeting of the U.N. Sustainable Development Commission. This initiative forms part of the United Nations’ Millennium Development Goals, which were announced in 2000 by the U.N. Secretary General.  The initiative aims at defining the role of private operators with respect to local public service management, while emphasizing the principles of transparency and the sharing of technology and know-how, principles to which we already adhere in connection with our adherence to the U.N. Global Compact. This sharing of know-how occurs in particular through our participation in the cooperation program for sustainable urbanization implemented by the United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR) and the World Bank (using research centers based in Poland, Malaysia, Brazil and Africa).

Our cooperation with UN agencies on multi-year programs as well as our sharing of know-how have led to our recognitionnomination as a company whose development assistance brings real added value (Publicationan associate member of the United Nations Global Compact Office, page 19, August 2005).  We were also a recognized participant at the annual Global Compact Forum (Shanghai, 2005) and the only private Western company called to testify at the congress of Asian cities (Citynet) on our vision for urban development (Hanoi, October 2005).

Since May 2004, we have also pursued a charity program through a corporate foundation created under the new provisions of a law dated August 1, 2003 relating to charitable actions.calledFondation d’Entreprise Veolia Environnement (the Veolia Environnement Foundation). . This initiative is part of a long and stronglong-standing tradition of corporate charity work, and was designed to improve coordination of actions and employee involvement in the areas of social solidarity, reintroduction of disadvantaged or handicapped people into the workforce, and environmental protection.  Since its creation, the Veolia Environnement Foundation has supported over 600 projects, each sponsored by one of our company, which attemptsemployees.

Certain of the 183 projects selected in 2007 (76 dedicated to encourage solidarity,sustainable development in communities, 67 to workforce reintroduction and 40 to environmental protectionprotection) demonstrate the international growth of the Veolia Environnement Foundation.  We have had the cooperation of the governments of several countries, including Slovakia, where the Veolia Environnement Foundation supports a center for information, health, education and professional employment.professional-related services in Lomnicka, to assist the Roma community.  The Veolia Environnement Foundation subsidized the purchase of a refrigerated truck to distribute food to the homeless in suburban Chicago, and has also supported a food bank in Montreal, Canada. In Chile, it helped build and equip a general sports field for young people living in disadvantaged neighborhoods in Santiago.  In India, the first Indian sponsor collaborated with a number of N GOs in India to support a program to combat the sexual exploitation of young girls.  In Afghanistan, Stérience, a subsidiary of Dalkia specializing in the sterilization of hospital materials, has made its expertise available to the Veolia Environnement Foundation in order to assist in creating a care center for serious burn victims.

In 2007, thePrix du Livre sur l’Environnement, created by the Veolia Environnement Foundation in 2006, was awarded toCollapse by Jared Diamond.  

We have two humanitarian aid and international cooperation departments: Veolia Water Force and Veolia Waterdev.  Veolia Waterforce was created in 1998 to assist the victims of Hurricane Mitch in Nicaragua and the Yangtze river flood in China. Its main purpose is to share expertise through its network of 450 volunteer employees.  Since its creation, Veolia Waterforce has carried out nearly 50 projects in emergency and development activities, in partnership with the United Nations, government institutions, local communities, NGOs and private companies. In 2007, Veolia Waterforce helped with the deployment of seven emergency humanitarian operations with French and foreign volunteers, in Sudan, Oman, Pakistan, Peru, North Korea, Mexico and Bangladesh. Veolia Waterforce was also called upon by its main partners, the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs and emergency medical care NGOs, to join forces in order to reinforce the capacity to provide common actions (tests of materials, coordination, development and unified procedures).



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 2651



Back to contentsContents


In Morocco for example, this corporate foundation has joined forces with UNICEF and the French Committee for UNICEF toWe also participate in the implementation of a program backed by the Moroccan government that aims to combat school dropouts, particularly among girls. Scheduled to last three years, this partnership also includes the urban district of Tangiers, a Moroccan NGO, the Amendis Corporation, a subsidiary ofdevelopment projects through Veolia Water, and Veolia Water Force, our urgent humanitarian intervention group. The two focal points will be improvement of health infrastructure in schools (installation of permanent water and toilet facilities) and the raising of awareness on the part of teachers and parents regarding hygiene and health issues for schoolchildren and their families. Work will be undertaken at 9 establishmentsWaterdev, an international cooperation department whose needs have been identified as urgent. This program, which involves 30 schools, was two-thirds co mpleted at the end of 2005.

Acting in tandem with Veolia Water Force, Waterdev is the expression of our will to go beyond urgent conditions and enter into developmental activities.  Its purposeobjective is to share experiences and to design, in partnershipdevise, along with public authorities,entities, civil society representatives from non-profit organizations and NGOs, solutions that willto facilitate access to local public water and sanitation services. Veolia Waterdev can intervene in these circumstances to urge French municipalities to cooperate in a decentralized manner.  In 2007, Veolia Waterdev participated in nearly 30 projects for the rehabilitation of water production and distribution systems in 15 countries, either through technical support for decentralized support programs or through the Alliance for Development, an innovative partnership bringing together the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the French Development Agency, sanofi-aventis and the Institut Pasteur to reinforce access to water, sanitation and sewage serviceshealth in the poor areas of large cities. Veolia Water Force acted in several situations during 2005. See “—Major Developments in 2005.”

In 2005, we participated in a partnership to protect the Antarctic region through our cooperation agreement withInstitut Paul-Émile-Victor(IPEV), an entity that manages the French presence on this continent. Under the partnership, five waste containers with a total capacity of twelve tons were shipped from Antarctica to the port of Havre. Veolia Environmental Services preparedNiger, Madagascar and sorted this waste before it was sent to the appropriate treatment centers.

We pursued actions in 2005 that focused on two areas:

·

cooperating with UN agencies within the context of multi-year programs designed to improve access to essential services (water, wastewater treatment, transportation, energy services) and environmental education; and


·

sharing know-how in order to help achieve the objectives of the United Nations’ Millennium Development Goals.


In connection with the 13th session of the U.N. Sustainable Development Commission that was held in May 2005 at the United Nations in New York, we supported development of a charter on public-private partnerships (PPP) in order to improve public access to essential services, and were chosen by UN Habitat to testify as to best practices in this area.Vietnam.


The Veolia Environnement Institute: a scientific approach dedicated to prospective tooltools for the environment and sustainable development

Human management of the environment represents a major challenge that requires the mobilization of a large number of resources, the support of the public at large and close cooperation among international, national and local participants. To address this challenge, we created the Veolia Environnement Institute, or VEI,the IVE, in 2001 to encourage prospective reflection on a number of issues relating to sustainable development, as well as to progressively shed light on the principal trends that will influence the provision of environmental management services over the next decade.  

Through its Prospects Committee, which is exclusively composed entirely of individuals of international reputation and standing, VEIthe IVE benefits from the contribution of leading external expertise on different key subjects (including public health, economy and human sciences) while maintaining a presence in the daily realities of our different activities. This dual capability represents both the originality and the strength of VEI,the IVE, which intends to be at the heart ofplay a leading role in the main environmental debates and issues of the 21st21st century.  The main themesIn order to be consideredachieve this, the Institute is enlarging its network of partners, in particular in North America and Asia, and developing its prospective program. It has collaborated with the JPAL lab at the Department of Economics of MIT (the Massachusetts Institute of Technology), on an air pollution study in a poor state of India.  It is also working in partne rship with TERI (The Energy and Resources Institute) on a study on the concept of ecological footprints and their application in two towns, one in India and one in China. At the same time, the IVE is developing a high-level scientific policy. In 2008, the Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society (SAPIENS), a multidisciplinary review, will publish articles from top specialists describing the latest advancements in the field of sustainable development. On another note, the FACTS (Field Action Science) Reports review aims to develop and consolidate the knowledge and expertise gained in field-work (such as that conducted by VEI in 2006, which are defined byNGOs and institutions) and has thus facilitated progress towards a larger understanding of these actions while improving their efficiency.

These efforts should provide us with a forum for discussion and the membersexchange of ideas about the Prospects Committee, will include themajor environmental, economic and social dimensionsissues of environmental change,today, in order to respond to the relationship between health and the environment, and the consequenceschanging needs of climatic change on ways of life and urban growth.

civil society.  As of the date hereof, the members of VEI’sthe IVE’s Prospects Committee are: Amartya Sen (India), economist, winner of the Nobel Prize for Economics in 1998, professor of political economics and economics at Lamont University and professor of philosophy at Harvard University; Hélène Ahrweiler, historian, president of the University of Europe and an expert for UNESCO on human and social sciences; Philippe Kourilsky, biologist, Director of Research at the Centre nationale de recherche scientifique (CNRS) and professor at the Collège de France; Pierre-Marc Johnson (Canada), attorney, physician, ex-prime minister of Quebec, Canada, and expert on environmental matters; Harvey Fineberg (USA), President of the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Science of the United States; and Ms. Manphela Ramphele (South Africa), physician and anthropologist, (South Africa).former president of the University of Cape Town and former chairman of the World Bank.

VEIThe IVE also organizes international conferences in France and abroad relatingabroad.  In 2007 the fourth conference was held in Montreal, on the topic of “The Climate 2050 – Technological and Political Solutions”. Organized with the help of two North American partners, the Table Center on Global Climate Change (USA) and the National Round Table on the Economy and the Environment (Canada), this event, held in October, brought together almost 400 participants from 12 countries. Under the patronage of Pierre Marc Johnson, Jean Charest, the Prime Minister of Quebec, Thierry Vandal, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Hydro-Québec and Sheila Watt Cloutier, the Inuit representative and Nobel Peace Prize nominee, were the guests of honor of the opening ceremony. The fifth IVE conference, to be held in late 2008 or early 2009, is expected to be in Abu Dhabi, the futureUnited Arab Emirates, on the theme of the environment (in India in December 2006 with The Energy and Resources Institute on the impact of climate change;an urban setting, in Mexico in 2007 on links between health and the environment; in Beijing in 2008collaboration with the Development Research Center,Chairman of the Middle Eastern and Mediterranean Political Studies Institute and a local partner with expertise on the need for environmental services in large Chinese cities during the coming decades).this subject.



52



Back to Contents


Environmental Compliance

As a specialist in environmental management services, we are naturally concerned about the environmental consequences of each of our activities, both in France and worldwide.  In this respect, we consistently endeavor to comply with applicable regulations, to meet the needs and requests of our clients and to optimize the techniques we implement. To illustrate our commitment, we highlight below some of the more significant environmental actions that we have undertaken regardless of any regulatory or contractual obligation to do so.

Set forth below are summaries of use of water resources, raw materials and energy, energy efficiency and renewable energy measures, soil and measures to limit air, water and soil pollution and noise pollution:

Use and Protection of Natural ResourcesWater

Use of Water Resources

We preserve water resources by working to prevent wasteful usage in our own installations and in those of our clients. In this respect, the continued implementation of our environmental management system provides, in particular, for the monitoring of water consumption and quality in all of our activities. Our action plan reflects two primary concerns: increased monitoring of the health quality of water destined for human consumption, and control ofcontrolling leaks in cold water distribution networks (raw or treated) and leaks in domestic hot water production networks. DuringIn 2004, we installed an indicator to monitor the quality and compliance with regulatory standards of our drinking water. Our industrial water consumption amounted to 210.3452.6 million cubic meters in 2005.2007.

Climatic developmentsClimate changes in certain regions of the world heighten stressesstrains on water resources.  We study and promote techniques through which alternative resources are used, such as the production of drinking water by desalination of seawater and production of water for industry or farm irrigation by recycling wastewater. These developments are doneconducted strictly in association with local authorities, regulatory proceedings and the scientific community.

We also take measures to avoid polluting water resources.  For example, 96%Water pollution

99.3% of Veolia Environmental Services’Propreté’s landfills are equipped with treatment stations for leachate (water that percolates through stored waste).  In addition, our

Waste water

Our wastewater treatment efficiency, measured at biological treatment stations with a capacity greater than 50,000 EH, reached 91%90% in 2005.2007.

Energy – Energy efficiency and the use of renewable energies

We contribute to the reduction of primary energy consumption. Dalkia optimizes energy management for close to 80,000more than 100,000 energy installations inaround the world, from municipal heating networks to public housing, commercial or industrial building boilers. Optimizing the energy efficiency of such thermal installations relies upon the quality of their operations and maintenance, as well as upon their modernization.

Dalkia’s strong growth emphasizes the use of heating networks that offer optimized energy performances by concentrating production on a single site and involving co-generation.  Efforts in thisthe renewable energy field include all of our activities. We are not only developing theways to use of renewable energies, like biomass, geothermal and solar energy (Dalkia), but we are also capturing energy from incineration factoriesfacilities and biogas from landfills (Veolia Environmental Services).landfills.

Veolia TransportationTransport continues to pursue its objective for the provision of providing environmental performance training to 90% of its public transport drivers during the first five years of their careers.  This training effort enables us not only to enhance passengers’ comfort and limit polluting emissions, but also to achieve significant fuel economy.  In 2005, 70% of2007, we continued employee training activities, now facilitated by our employees participated in training activities.campus.

Our total energy consumption amounted to 101117.59 million MWh in 2005, given the development2007, as a result of the group’s activities.



growth of our business.

VEOLIA

- Form 20-F | 27

53



Back to contentsContents


Use of soils

InSince 2003, we integratedhave combined all activities relating to the treatment and recovery of sludge ininto a single entity (SEDE Environment).  This integration continued during 2004, resulting in the implementation during 2005 of indicators to measure the quality of sludge. This has resulted in our havingAs a result, we have a specific and integrated overview of sludge management options, allowing us to optimize our agricultural recovery in particular.

In this way weWe have pursued our efforts to manage the quality of waste in the sewage networks and acted upstream to enhance the quality of sludge produced by implementing pollutant controls in our wastewater treatment networks (through our Actipol method).  Veolia WaterEau has finalized a reference and certification system defining the applicable requirements for a sewage system for the production of quality sludge to be used as compost.  As a second step,In addition, we promote the agricultural recovery of sludge through composting and engage an independent certifying body to audit our composting and agricultural recovery networks.  This recovery is doneconducted in conjunction with the agricultural recovery of the fractionportion usable for fertilization from household waste.

We produced 764,0001,006.1 thousands of tons of compost in 2005, 40%2007, 45.8% of which was eligible to be used in agricultural activities.

We have initiated a quality enhancement program for organic material produced from organic waste and a program to evaluate their agricultural impact (the Quali-Agro program led by CREEDCRPE – our center for research on waste energy services) in coordination with the INRA.  We are also active in the rehabilitation of polluted soils. Relying on several processes, including thermal absorption, Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté processes almost all of the pollutants present in the soil at industrial sites.

Air Pollution

Limiting Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Certain of Dalkia’s activities (in particular its combustion installations with thermal output greater than 20 MW) are subject to the provisions of European Directive 2003/87/EC of October 13, 2003, which establishes a quota exchange system for carbon gas emissions. This system has been in place among EU member states since the beginning of 2005. In addition, we are generally contributing to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions,

Direct and have developed an action plan to improve the energy efficiency of our services. The action plan also calls for us to participate actively in the flexibility mechanisms set forth under the Kyoto protocol, which entered into force on February 16, 2005.

Directindirect (energy consumption-related) greenhouse gas emissions (including biogas discharges) on sites that we managed in 2005 reached 33.72007 amounted to 42.8 million tons of CO2CO2 (carbon dioxide) equivalent, due to development of the group’s activities.growth in our business. Given the differing national and international methods for measuring the production and emission of methane at waste landfills, we are unable to provide a reliable measure at this time. We arehave decided to further our knowledge of measuring methods, notably through participating in a working group that isgroups of international authorities (WBCSD and WRI). The work of elaborating and attempting to reconcile the different methods.  methods should make it easier to identify a single method which could serve as a reference for all of our sites and allow for a homogenous and comparable reporting method.  

We are also contributing to a reduction in CH4greenhouse gas emissions, through the implementation ofboth by reducing our direct emissions and by avoiding emissions which would have been produced without Veolia Environmental Services. Among our actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, Veolia Environmental Services continues its efforts to implement and optimize biogas collection and burning systems, as well as biogas recovery systems in its landfills. 7790 waste landfills overfor which we control investments are equipped with collection and biogas recovery systems.  In 2007, our efforts contributed to an overall decrease in CO2 of 24.71 million tons.

Other Emissions

Installations that we operate mainly emit sulfur and nitrogen oxides (SOX(SOX and NOX)NOX), carbon monoxide (CO), volatile organic compounds and dust.  The methodEmissions of calculating emissions of SOXSOX from waste incineration units (hazardous and non-hazardous) was improved in 2005 and allowed us to estimate that these emissions amounted to approximately 14790 grams per ton of incinerated waste in 2005.  We are still working towards the development of an indicator for NOX emissions.  For example, 2007.  

Veolia Transportation,Transport, in partnership with ADEME, is pursuing a studyperforming research to identify and assess the systems in the market systems capable of reducing the NOX emissions ofNOX emitted its buses and coaches.  Dalkia has also been conducting an evaluation program for several years on the various techniques available for reducing emissions (low emission burners, smoke recirculation, air staging, combustion modeling, etc.).

We attempt to reduce our emissions in addition to complying withfurther below regulatory standards, by:

·

enhancing air pollutionminimums  by (i) improving the treatment of emissions and developing more effective treatmentbetter technologies including treating smoke from our waste(treatment of incineration units, enhancing the qualityfumes by Veolia Propreté, improvement of transportation vehicle emissions of our transport vehiclesfor Veolia Transport, low NOx-emitting combustion technologies for Dalkia) and utilizing low NOx combustion technology in the case of Dalkia’s activities, and


·

(ii) reducing consumption and favoringencouraging the use of cleancleaner fuels such as fuel oil or low sulfur(low-sulfur coal, natural gas, natural gasGNV for combustion installations and vehicles or vehicles, and electric or dual-mode vehicles.cars).



54



Back to Contents


WeFurthermore, Veolia Transport continues to pursue its efforts to reduce polluting emissions (CO2, hydrocarbons and particles) from its fleet of passenger vehicles. In 2006, a new scope of reference was defined, corresponding to 80% of its 2005 bus and coach fleet. Emissions reduction targets have been set for the end of 2008: 8% for carbon monoxide unit emissions (CO), 14% for hydrocarbons (HC) and 15% for particles. Veolia Transport also continues to pursue its commitment to train its drivers in environmental performance. These training efforts allow not only for better comfort for passengers and a reduction in polluting emissions but also for substantial gas savings to be achieved.  In 2007, the number of employees being trained increased to 55.9%.

With respect to NOx emissions, over the last few years Dalkia has carried out an evaluation program relating to available emissions reduction technologies (including fuel oil emissions, recycling of fumes, air staging, and combustion modeling).    

Veolia Propreté has developed a semi-continuoussemi-permanent dioxin emissions control method to monitor emissions of dioxins during waste incineration, allowing for a control of the aggregate flow of such pollutants emitted throughout the year.  We offer this reliable and efficient measurement technique to all of our clients.


Noise and olfactive pollution


We have also developed new treatment and storage techniques for odors, particularly in wastewater treatment plants and landfills for household waste.  We also use new and more silent technologies in some of our installations, including special wall coatings, sound traps and exhaust gas exit silencers for cogeneration installations or transport vehicles.  The permanent increase in waste quantities around the world presents major risks for the environment.


Preserving biological balance, natural environments and protected species

We included the protection of biodiversity in the first undertaking of our Sustainable Development Charter and since 2004 have developed an approach based on the nature of our businesses’ impact and the implementation of our Environmental Management System.

To distinguish our impact, we rely on an internal expert who is primarily responsible for the analysis of biological tools used to evaluate the ecological state of marine and land life. Moreover, we work with a number of universities and institutions in order to further our knowledge through innovative research programs covering the interactions between our activities and the functioning of ecosystems.  

We also carry out a number of management plans with the aim of informing our employees and promoting best practices. Among the latter, the Geographical Biodiversity Information System allows us to visualize the locations of ecological zones of interest around our main facilities (Hotspot of the International Conservation Organization).

In order to improve the structure of our policies, we are currently working on defining a methodology allowing sites to carry out biodiversity diagnostics and to implement appropriate action plans.

In France, numerous activities fall under the control of either the ICPE (facilities classified for environmental protection) or its equivalent.  Therefore, all business development is conducted in connectiontandem with the realizationpreparation of environmental impact studies concerning very precise facetsaspects of flora and fauna.  The controlmanagement of these impacts therefore comprisesenvironmental impact is accordingly a constant preoccupation for our different business operations (waste(including waste treatment, decontamination stations, combustion facilities and railway depositories, etc.) In addition, our researchers closely follow the evolution of scientific debates on biodiversity in order to be able to identify the most pertinent indicators in our areas of activity.depositories)

Evaluation or certification regarding the environment

Our activities have been subject to environmental certification, both external (ISO) and internal, for a long time.  The number of our ISO 14001 certified sites has increased continuously since 1999.  In addition,2002, we seekcommitted to achieve the targets set by ourimplementing an environmental management system for allcovering 80% of our installations, which lead, subjectactivities by the end of 2008. Subject to the circumstances of each of the entities concerned, to thethis is a voluntary step resulting in general application of the ISO 14001 certification standards. We currently have 705939 sites covered by an ISO 14001 certification.



55



Back to Contents


Compliance with applicable legal and regulatory provisions

Our environmental management system includes, among other things, an environmental audit program that allows us to monitor our sites’ regulatory compliance, as well as their compliance with contractual obligations and group standards. We have defined a general framework to ensure consistency of the audit systems developed by our divisions, and each of our divisions remains responsible for the definition and implementation of its own system.  We surpassed our goal of conducting audits for 80% of priority sites in 2005.  Priority sites are drinking water production sites and urban treatment stations, waste treatment sites, Dalkia’s classified installations and several of Veolia Transportation’sTransport’s transportation centers.  AsBy the end of December 31, 2005, 80%2008, 100% of our primary facilities werewill be subject to a regulatory compliance audit.  These facilities are the most sensitive to environ mentalenvironmental impacts.  As of December 31, 2007, 89.4% of the primary facilities were subject to a statutory audit for compliance.

Expenses incurred to preserve the environment

Given the nature of our services, a large majority of our expenditures and investments have a direct impact on the environment. Our capital expenditures amounted to €2.13€2.642 billion in 2005,2007, which includes not only investments of a contractual nature, but also expenses incurred for research and development, employee training, our certification program and the implementation of our environmental management system.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 28



Back to contents


Prevention of environmental risks

In addition to the measures described above to reducefor the reduction of environmental risks, such as research and development or employee training,  we have establishedformed an environmental performance department.  This department ensures thatdepartment’s principal mission is the deployment and management of the Environmental Management System, thereby encouraging consistent objectives and actions ofamong our divisions are consistent, particularly in connection with the implementation of the environmental management system, and encouragesas well as information sharing and best practices.  It leads an environmental management committee, composed of representatives of all of our divisions and representatives from the sustainable development department. A steering committee, made up of a number of members of the executive committee from each division and representatives from various departments (particularly our sustainable development, legal and communicationcommunications departments). will also be formed to approve environmental management strategy and to report to our executive committee on an annual basis.  In addition, our risk department is in charge of identifying, evaluating and managing risks. It relies on our risk committee

We have also established crisis management procedures that cover environmental crisis management, including, in particular, on-call and alarm systems at national and international levels that would allow any necessary measures to be taken as soon as possible.

Reserves and guarantees for environmental risks

As of December 31, 2005,2007, our accrued reserves for site remediation amounted to €335€539.5 million.

Indemnities and damages paid in 20052007 for environmental claims pursuant to court orders

As of December 31, 2005, our accrued reservesReserves for litigation endedconsummated in 2005 (including2007 amounted to €89.8 million, including all types of claimslitigation (tax, employment and disputes) amounted to €102 million.other litigation).

International environmental targets

We apply our environment management system, asIn 2007, the Environmental Management System described above, continued to allexpand, reaching almost 75% of our subsidiaries worldwide.  We are pursuing the goal of extending it to 80% of our relevant businesses by the end of 2008.

Intellectual Property

We own a significant number of patents and trademarks in France and other countries around the world that are of value to our business.  However, we believe that the diversity of our patents and trademarks does not make any of our activities dependent on any one of these patents or trademarks individually. Moreover, we believe that our activities are not materially dependent on any one license that we may own.own, or on any one industrial, commercial or financing contract. We also believe that we are not materially dependent upon any particular contract or client.



56



Back to Contents


Marketing

We market our products and services by continuously offering to provide a more comprehensive range of environmental services to clients.  We often sell our products and services by responding to requests for consultations. These may be highly regulated events when it comes to a public authority conducting a public bid tender, but generally we are able in such situations to take advantage of our reputation and know-how and propose a solution that is best adapted to a client’s needs.  In the absence of a formal bidding procedure, which is generally the rule for commercial services clients, we analyze the environmental service needs of prospective clients and demonstrate to them how our services could improve the efficiency of their operations.  See “— Contracts.” For more information regarding marketing efforts by each of our divisions, see “— Our Services. Se rvices.

Seasonality

Because of the diverse nature of our operations and our worldwide presence, our business is typically not subject to material seasonal variations. Our results are only slightly affected globally, with the exceptionglobally. Nonetheless, certain of Veolia Energy Services (Dalkia), whichour businesses are subject to seasonal variation. Dalkia realizes the bulk of its operating results in the first and fourth quarters of the year, corresponding to periods in which heating is used in Europe. In theour water sector,division, household water consumption and the related treatment services required tend to be more elevatedhigher between May and September in the northern hemisphere, where Veolia WaterEau conducts the majoritymost of its activity.activities.  In transportation, SNCM’s activity is strongest in the summer season.

Raw Materials

We purchase raw materials on a worldwide basis from numerous suppliers. We sometimes secure our supply of materials through medium-term and long-term contracts. We have not experienced difficulties in obtaining sufficient amounts of raw materials and supplies in recent years and we do not have any reason to anticipate any material difficulties in the future.  However, the price of raw materials and supplies may vary substantially.

Energy prices have fluctuated widely in the past few years, for instance,years. After a lull at the end of 2006, Brent oil doubled in price per barrel from its lowest level in January 2007 (US$49) to its price in February 2008 (US$101), due in part to fears of potential supply problems in light of the geopolitical tensions in major oil producing countries (Nigeria and we cannot anticipateVenezuela), as well as OPEC’s reluctance to raise its production quotas to respond to strong global growth in 2007.  Although the evolution of these pricesslowdown in the future. In 2005, we recorded a net charge of approximately €30 million relatedAmerican economy is likely to contain any further price volatility, the increase in energy prices (€17 million for Veolia Transportation and €13 million for Veolia Energy Services).  market expects the price per barrel to remain high.

We were able to limit our additional charges to this amountthe impact of the rise in the price of raw energy materials on results in 2007 since our contracts typically contain price adjustment and/or indexing provisions designed to compensate us for increases in the cost of providing our services.  Such provisions include indexing clauses that take into account the variation of certain parameters, review clauses in the case of a risean increase in certain parameters above a given level, hardship clauses (unforeseeable changes due to extraordinary circumstances) or re-equilibriumre-adjustment clauses. These provisions therefore assist us in passing along a portion of any rise in energy or raw material prices to clients (subject to a possible time period in which we would havemust wait to await reimbursement)assess the impact of a price adjustment).

In the transportation division, numerous contracts contain indexing clauses that take variations in fuel costs into account, which significantly reduces the impact of a rise or fall in fuel prices. In certain contracts, notablyespecially those involving the United States, we are entitled to full compensation in the event of rising fuel prices.

In the waste management division, collection services involving non-hazardous solid and liquid waste are the most sensitive to fluctuations in fuel prices.  However, for clients that have contracts with us, indexing clauses in thosetheir contracts generally allow us to pass along a goodsignificant portion of our increase in such costs in the prices we charge to clients.  For clients not bound by contract, increases in fuel costs are either fully or partially passed along to clientsthem through an updating of tariffsfees or through commercial negotiation.

In the energy services division, the situation with respect to combustible materials used for its activities is similar to the descriptionthat described above. With respect to gas supplies in particular, the deregulation of the market has not altered our use of indexing clauses in our contracts. We have developed the skills necessary to manage and optimize our gas supplies within the new market environment.



57



Back to Contents


Insurance

Objectives of Insurance Procurement Policy

Our insurance procurement policy for all of our operating divisions has the following objectives:

·

maintaining common insurance policies to establish a coherent risk transfer and coverage policy andin order to maximize economies of scale, while taking into account the specificities of our businesses and legal or contractual constraints; and

·

optimizing the thresholds and the means for accessing the insurance or reinsurance markets through use of varying deductibles or acceptance of a primary layer of retention through our insurance subsidiary, Codeve Insurance Company Limited.appropriate deductibles.

In 2005, our insurance programs—covering property damage/business interruption, comprehensive general liability, environmental impairment liability and directors’ and officers’ liability—were renewed at the same limits and primary coverage as in 2004. We2007, we continued to seek to optimize the amount of insurance premiums we paid to outside insurers.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 29



Back to contents


Implementation of Insurance Procurement Policy

Policy

Our strategy with respect to insurance procurement is to (i) establish a global insurance procurementcoverage policy to cover our activities, based in particular on the needs expressed by our subsidiaries, in particular, (ii) select and sign contracts with outside providers (brokers,(such as brokers, insurers, loss adjusters, etc.)adjusters), (iii) manage consolidated subsidiaries specializing in insurance or reinsurance coverage, and (iv) lead and coordinate the network of insurance managers present among our principal subsidiaries.

Implementation

The implementation of an insurance procurementcoverage policy aimed at covering risk is effectedcarried out in coordination with our global risk management process.  Implementation is affected by the insurability of risks related to our activities, by the market availability of insurance and reinsurance, and by the relationship between premiums and the level of coverage, exclusions, limits, sub-limits and deductibles.

In continuation of efforts begun in 2004,2007, we undertook actions in 2005 principally related to:

·

the determinationreadjustment of retention levels (retained risk) based on the basis of an analysis of risks and loss history and an evaluation of the costs and coverage proposed by insurers;

·

the reinforcement of efforts to identify, prevent and protect against risks thanks in particular to a rating system for the “property damage and business interruption” risk profile for our most important facilities;facilities around the world;

·

the communication of detailed information regarding our company to the insurance and reinsurance markets;

·

the renegotiation of contracts, in particular to strengthen our civilgeneral liability and pollution liabilityproperty coverage; and

·

extending our Group’s coverage; and

the adoptionorganization of broker services for the group’s coverage.placement and administration of our insurance programs.

Main Group Insurance Policies

CivilGeneral Liability

ForA general civil liability and environmental damage program was subscribed to on July 1, 2005, around the environment, we renewed a worldwide insurance policyworld (excluding the U.S. and Canada) on July 1, 2005. Coveragefor a period of three years. Principal coverage is up to €50 million per claim and per year. For the U.S. and Canada, different contracts cover civilgeneral liability and damage to the environment on behalf of groupGroup subsidiaries, based on local conditions, in an amount of up to US$50 million per claim and per year.

For all groupGroup subsidiaries worldwide, an insurance program provides excess coverage for up to US $450US$450 million, thereby giving us total coverage of US$500 million throughout the insurance period. This program includes coverage for environmental liability for damage sustained by third parties as a result of a sudden and accidental event.



58



Back to Contents


Our liability for terrorism policy was renewed under our general liability program on July 1, 2007 for a twelve-month period with a total coverage of US$165 million per claim per year.

Further, certain activities, such as a maritime transport, automobile and construction, have their own specific insurance policies.

Property DamagesDamage and Business Interruption Policies  

All four of our divisions maintain property damage insurance policies to cover assets that they own as well as those that they have a contractual obligation to insure.  Some policies provideoperate on behalf of clients. Our global insurance program provides either “business interruption” coverage or “additional cost of working” coverage depending on such subsidiaries’ exposure and their capacity to use internal or external solutions to ensure service continuity.  These policies contain standard market terms.  The level of premiums, deductibles and sub-limits for exceptional socio-political or natural events reflects the terms proposed, or sometimes imposed, by insurers in the markets in which the risk is underwritten. As in 2004, groupGroup insurance coverage implemented on January 1, 20052007 (for a term of three years) carries a limit per claim of up to €205€300 million.  Some of this coverage contains further underlying limitssub-limits per claim or per year.

Other Insurance Policies   

In light of the difficulties encountered in the insurance market, we cover motor liability risks relating to the vehicles used in our activities (such as passenger transportation or collection of hazardous and non-hazardous waste) through deductibles or reserves accrued per event from several thousand euros to €1 million. Depending on the country, collateral may be required, including sureties or letters of credit.

Construction projects are insured through construction all-risk policies underwritten either by the main contractor or the operating company.yea r.

Self-Insured Retention and Deductibles

For any insured claim or loss, we remain liable for the deductible amount.amount set out in the relevant policy.  The amount may range from several thousand euros to more than one million euros.

RegardingIn 2007, Codeve Insurance Company Limited, our insurance subsidiary, had a retention (retained risk) of  €2.5 million per claim for property damage and business interruptionconsequential financial losses, and €5 million for insurance of general liabilities.

Regarding both property damage and general liability, Codeve Insurance Company Limited has underwritten, beginning on January 1, 2005, underlyingput in place reinsurance contracts for €5 million per event for property damagein order to limit its exposure to frequency risks (“stop loss”-type contracts) and business interruption, which may be increasedrisks tied to €7.5 million per event involving collision or derailment in connection with rail transport activities. Codeve Insurance Company Limited in turn has coverage of €35 million per year that is triggered after a deductible of €12.5 million per year.

Regarding civil liability insurance, Codeve Insurance Company Limited has underwritten, beginning on July 1, 2005, underlying contracts for €5 million per event. Codeve Insurance Company Limited in turn has coverage of €8 million per year that is triggered after a deductible of €18 million per year.

Codeve Insurance Company Limited’s portfolio of risks involves all aspects of our business in numerous countries.intensity (excess claim-type contracts).

In general, the insurance coverage described above constantly evolves as a function of ongoing risk evaluation, market conditions and insurance coverage available. We attempt to have our known operating risks covered by insurance when it is economically feasible to do so. However, we cannot guarantee that we will not suffer damages or losses that are not fully or partially covered by insurance.

ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

Our company is divided into four operating divisions corresponding to each of our four business segments and a number of centralized corporate departments that lead and coordinate the actions of teams present in each of the four operating divisions. We believe that this organizational structure encourages the coherent development of our group by reinforcing its identity, maintaining solidarity and cohesion, favoring economies of scale and encouraging professionalism through the sharing of best practices.

See “— History and Development of the Company” for a description of the history of the creation of our organizational structure.



59



Back to Contents


PROPERTY, PLANTS AND EQUIPMENT

We use various assets and equipment in order to conduct our activities, with respect to which we have very different rights.  

In the course of our concession businesses, we must ensure the provision of public services (such as distribution of drinking water, heat, transport networks or household waste collection services), for payment for the services rendered.  We have relatively little real estateusually manage these collective services (also referred to as general services, general economic services or public services) under contracts signed at the request of public entities that we own outright.  Mostmaintain the control of assets relating to such collective services.  These concession contracts are characterized by the transfer of an operating right for a fixed term, under the control of the time,public authorities, through appropriate installations built by us or put at our disposal whether free of charge or not. These installations normally consist of pipelines, water treatment and purification plants and pumps in our water division, incineration plants in our environme ntal services division, and heating and co-generation plants in our energy services division.  

We are usually contractually bound to maintain and repair assets managed under these public service contracts. If needed, the buildingsrelated repair and installations that we use do not belong to us; instead, their use is governedmaintenance costs are covered by fixed-terma deposit for contractual commitments in the event of delays in work. The nature and duration of rights acquired and our obligations in respect of these contracts pursuant to which we agree to provide various services to clients. Atdiffer depending on the outsetnature of the contract,public services we provide.

Within the client generally grants usscope of our outsourcing contracts with industrial clients, BOT (Build, Operate, Transfer) contracts or incineration or co-generation contracts, we may grant our clients a user right for a group of assets in return for rent included in the right to use any pre-existing buildings and installations for the durationgeneral payment of the contract. InUnder the event thatIFRIC4 standard, we initially investthereby become a credit-lessor with respect to our clients.  The corresponding assets are therefore recorded in the construction of certain facilities, the contract generally calls for theconsolidated balance sheet as operating financial assets.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 30



Back to contents


facility to be returned to the client or to our successor upon completion of the contract term. During the contract term, we may or may not be the legal owner of assets, depending on the legal system involved. However,In some cases, we are nearly always the operator of these assets, which we are required to maintain and sometimes rehabilitate.  

We are occasionallyalso the full owner of real property, including industrial installations, in particularmainly for activities undertaken outside of global contracts. Incontracts in our waste management division for example, we may own CSDUs (storage(CSDUs, storage centers for ultimate waste)waste and special waste treatment plants), and in our energy services division we may(co-generation plants) and in our transportation division (buses, boats and trains). These assets are recorded in the consolidated balance sheet as tangible assets.

Our property, plants and equipment are subject to certain charges, such as maintenance and repair costs and closure or post-closure costs. We do not seek to own co-generation plants.

We strive not to be the owner of any office buildings.offices.  Accordingly, we rent a building located at 36/38, avenue Kléber, 75116, Paris, France that we use as our corporate headquarters.  Our and our divisions’ senior management have maintained their offices in this building since May 2002, where certain central functions are performed.

Assets financed through direct financing leases, which can be entered under any of the three categories mentioned above, represented a net amount of €900 million as of December 31, 2007.  The total gross value of our property, plants and equipment as of December 31, 2007 was €28,711 million (a net value of €17,820 million as of December 31, 2007, representing 38% of total consolidated assets), compared to €25,833 million as of December 31, 2006 (a net value of €15,724 million).

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (R&D)

ProtectingOur activities are at the environment is an essential task in this new millennium. Population growth as well as ancrossroads of the main challenges of the modern world: urbanization, access to water, the confrontation with climate change. The solutions to these current challenges require a global industrial and technological approach. This global approach lies at the core of our Research and Development (R&D) strategy.


The focus of our R&D currently includes resource management and preservation, limiting environmental impact, improving quality of life inand developing countries have ledsources of renewable energies.  Fighting climate change is also a top priority.  Our research efforts relate principally to significant tension concerning the availabilityoptimizing energy within our facilities, collecting and quality of water resources. Greenhouse gas emissions pose ever greater risks to the world’s climate. Beyond risks to the environment, the quality of lifestoring carbon dioxide and health of individuals are now at stake.developing bioenergy sources and clean transport methods.


FindingIn each of these areas, our expertise and our technologies are complementary. This is the case, for example, in the area of sludge, biomass, biofuels, prevention of Legionnaires’ disease, or treatment of factory effluents. Our network of international experts and the application of our research programs at different geographical study sites allow us to seek answers to specific local problems in contexts that may be adaptable to other regions of the world.  In all their work, our research teams are committed to responding to environmental challenges while ensuring our competitiveness.  For us. R&D is a solutionpriority area: the 45% increase since 2003 in resources allocated to these challenges requires the mobilizationefforts is evidence of public and private actors. Effective solutions will have to be based on technology that is innovative, reliable and cost-effective so as to be available to the greatest number of people.


R&D is therefore an important part of our strategy, to which we have allocated increasing resources.  Our ability to remain a leader is closely tied to our research and development capabilities.


Our research programs have three objectives:


·

anticipating environmental and health problems to which our businesses can find solutions;


·

ensuring the safety and security of our activities; and


·

creating technological solutions that are increasingly effective, reliable and accessible to the largest number of people.this commitment.


R&D

60



Back to Contents


Research and Development Resources


Our R&Dresearch activities are coordinatedoverseen by Veolia Environnement Recherche et Innovation (VERI), which since January 2007 has fulfilled the missions of our research, developmentResearch, Development and technologyTechnology department, or “research department”“Research Department”. In 2005,2007, this department consisted of nearly 600 expertsworldwide800 experts worldwide (including 300400 researchers and 300400 on-site developers). Our with a total budget of approximately €118 million.  For the year ended December 31, 2007, research andexpenses totaled €84.6 million, which, when added to operational development costs, amountedamounts to €62.9 million, €62.6 million and €95.3 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. an estimated budget of €118 million.  

The research departmentVeolia Environnement Research Department works on behalf of all of our divisions, given that their needs are similar.  In particular, all seek to solve environmental and health problems with the aid of numerous tools, such as modeling and chemical and bacteriological analysis. By working on behalf of all divisions, the research departmentResearch Department helps to ensure that we apply aour R&D activities remain consistent  with our strategy.


We have threefour main research centers that operate as a network. Located in France:


·

Anthe Ile-de-France region surrounding Paris and specializing in water, waste, energy and waste research center(Creed), basedtransportation, the centers have related units or correspondents in Limay with branches inFrance and abroad (in the United Kingdom, and Australia, which focuses on waste treatment technologies (incineration, co-incineration, CET, etc.), on material recovery and on optimization of services in the energy sector, including by resorting to alternative energies (fuel cells and wood channels) or renewable energies (solar sensors).


·

A transportation research center(Eurolum), based in Paris, which focuses on information systems (both for the operator and for the traveling client), on innovative transportation systems (transportation on demand, for example), on vehicles and clean fuels, and on infrastructures, logistics and monetics.


·

A water research center (Anjou Research), based in Maisons-Laffitte with branches in Germany, the United States and Australia, which is the historical research center of Veolia Water (Compagnie Générale des Eaux)Australia).  It includes 130 researchers who work primarily on drinking water (from production to distribution of drinking water), purification (urban wastewater treatment, sludge treatment and odor treatment) and industrial water solutions. The European Commission has named it a “Marie Curie Center of Excellence” for its membrane, disinfecting and modeling technology. The Anjou research center includes an expert center on membranes (ARAMIS), which evaluates the performance of membranes so as to improve operating conditions.


WeIn 2003, we established an international researchResearch and developmentDevelopment correspondent network in 2003 in order to identify and analyze specific local needs in terms of technical development and innovation.innovation needs.  Certain research centers abroad have acquired specialized expertise and are partners with centers in France. These research centers helpunits add to highlight our technological expertise. InFor example, in the area of water, for example, the Berlin CentreCenter of Competence for Water (KompetenzZentrum Wasser) has become an international(Kompetenzzentrum Wasser Berlin) is the reference point for information relating to the protection of water resources.resources, while Australia has become the reference point for water reclamation information.  


The research teams include experts in the fields of health, environment and analysis who help anticipate the needs of and provide support to operators:

The Environment Department runs the research programs centered on the management and protection of water resources, environmental model building as well as on the evaluation of risks and environmental impacts (ACV);

The Health Department evaluates the risks and health benefits linked to our  activities in collaboration with doctors and environmental health specialists.  It preventively identifies emerging health dangers and oversees the health and safety of our services.

The Environmental Analyses Center (EAC) conducts our analytical research activities and manages a network of laboratories. It carries out environmental and health monitoring control analyses for our entire Group. It develops measurement methods to rapidly and precisely identify pollutants or microorganisms in a very low concentration.

Innovation: a rationalized method

Our research department coordinates technical “support” functions relatingteam aims to provide innovative practical solutions within its areas of expertise, which are crucial for our competitiveness. R&D is driven by a rationalized method allowing technological information, environmental management, intellectual property defenserisks to be mastered, and laboratory analysis.  The research department also coordinatesallowing rapid progress and the technical functionscreation of various other departments, such as our health department. These technical support functions play a role in anticipating future needs as environmental regulations evolve. Our goal is not only to satisfy current health and environmental standards but also to follow the progress of health and environmental authorities as they develop new norms for the future.


The health department assists in defining the scope of our research programs. In particular, the health department identifies emerging sanitary dangers and establishes sanitary indicators, and conducts work aimed at achieving better command over the risk of legionnaire’s disease.  The health department is also a recognized partner for public health bodies and institutions such as theInstitut de Veille Sanitaire,Direction Générale de la Santé, AFSSE or INSERM.


A specific environmental department assesses the environmental impact of our activities and steers our environmental management system. It prepares the follow-up, monitoring and reporting procedures of our environmental data and contributes to the preparation ofsuccessful commercial offers. A network of information experts within the research department manages our scientific and technical information and places at employees’ disposal tools for technical, commercial and regulatory monitoring.


The research department also coordinates a network of laboratories (8 sites in France)applications that are part of an environmental analysis center.  This center’s expertise extends to all of our divisions,both reliable and includes a microbiology and chemistry analytical research laboratory.  Its missions are:


·

quicker and more precise analytical technical development;

·

improvement of already existing methods.


The environmental analysis center is an indispensable link in the areas of:


·

sanitary risk control,

·

environmental quality measures,

·

processing evaluation,

·

network management assistance.


We rely on technological innovations, the development of which is a full-time activity as part of a long and complex process.


effective. The main steps in the innovation process are:



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 31



Back to contents



·

strictStrict regulatory, technological and commercial monitoring that enables us to anticipate future needs and proceed with the launch of new research programs as quickly as possible.  Tests in the laboratoryLaboratory or in the field tests are then madecarried out to checkverify the feasibility of the research.  At this stage, analytical modeling may be carried out, depending on the circumstances (i.e.,(that is, exploring functionality and cost containment potential).


·

If the tests are successful, a prototype is built in the laboratory or on site in order to evaluate and refine the technology.


·

The next phase is the development of a pre-industrial unit to be installed on aan appropriate site and operated by personnel.


For each of the stepsstep in the innovation process, various entities (research laboratory,teams, university or private teams)laboratories) are requiredcalled upon to collaborate.  For us,At each step of the objectiveinnovation process, researchers use sophisticated tools, such as digital fluid mechanics.  This technology enables researchers to simulate the operation of these partnershipsis to discover early on innovations that could have a positive impact on our businesses. Many public-private and international partnerships have therefore been forged (research or co-financing agreements) with, among others:


·

the Institut Pasteur, Inra, CNRS, Ademe, EPA;


·

French and foreign schools: INSA (Lyon and Toulouse), Ecole des Mines, Imperial College (London), University of Lund (Sweden), University of Florida, Ecole Polytechnique of Montréal, University of Hong Kong.


Our researchers also take part in European research programs(involvement in the LIFE and PCRD projects in particular).


Research Themes


In the area of energy services, R&D activities have resulted in the development of tools that enable Dalkia to adapt to new market conditions: cost control by optimization of traditional techniques (continuous measuring of gas quality, efficiency of cold production) and development of alternative energies (demonstrations of cogeneration by fuel cell, energy wood, solar energy).  To prevent health and environmental risks, teams are working on the elaboration of new techniques (control of legionella, CO2capture techniques, internal air quality measures).


In the area of waste management, research efforts are focused in two areas: improvement in the performance of major waste treatment channels (compost and organic waste methanization, storage, incineration), and the creation of new channels, in particular with respect to recycling (automated selection), waste recovery (hazardous wastes, electric and electronic waste)and energy recovery (alternative combustibles).  These research efforts are at an advanced enough stage that a set of operational pilot units already exists.  These industrial-sized devices allow us to perform operations that will yield representative sample data and experiment with new technological configurations. Preliminary results have been encouraging, and some projects may move more quickly to the industrialization phase.


In the area of transportation, our logistics program has led to the launch of operational research programs on driving assistance systems for our agents (fore and aft steering assistance for TEOR vehicles currently operated in Rouen, new technology that minimizes the time for buses to cross intersections, PUVAME to reduce accidents between buses and pedestrians or cyclists, LOCOPROL for railway signal lights).  The year 2005 was marked by the introduction of new smaller sized vehicles for local service (Microbus) and by the large-scale rollout of a traveler information service on mobile phones in Bordeaux. Regarding atmospheric pollution, in parallel to the studies currently being conducted on the pollution control systems of land transportation vehicles (EURO 3 type, followed by EURO 4), we have initiated studies on ways to reduce electricity consumption by trams.


In the area of water, research efforts have focused in particular on the management and protection of water resources. For example, we are involved in the “Bankfiltration” project at the Berlin Centre of Competence for Water, which is aimed at controlling the entire water cycle, including ground water. The project involves the efforts of approximately thirty researchers and five universities.  Other research is being conducted in Australia on the injection of groundwater that will expand our experience in this field as well as the array of technologies we are capable of offering to clients. With respect to drinking water production, research efforts relate to the optimization of treatment processes and the use of membranous technologies.


In the area of wastewater treatment, research into pollution control installations and networks have enabled the developmenttest a larger number of real-time management tools for wastewater treatment systems.  Research into agronomic recovery of sludge is carried out in tandem with the development (in particular through their industrialization) of new processesscenarios to improve efficiency.  Over a shorter period, such as Biothelys, which reduces the amounts of sludge emitted, Saphyr, which sanitizes and reduces odors, and Pyromix, which co-incinerates sludge and household waste.


The perfecting of toolssoftware enables researchers to assist operations also constitutes a significant part of our R&D efforts.  Efforts relate to all type of operations (networks, plants, tanks, stations, etc.), and all fields: water, waste management, energy and transportation. Recent developments made with the help of artificial intelligence (neural networks, fuzzy logic, genetic algorithms, etc.) should lead to promising new uses, in particular for the advanced conduct of processes. They should lead to a range of functions enabling us to anticipate incidents, to define automatic instructions and to prepare more adjusted maintenance programs.optimize test protocols.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 3261



Back to contentsContents


Our researchers are part of an international network. They work closely with other research teams, each benefiting from the expertise of the others. While these collaborations enrich the knowledge of our R&D group and keep it up to date, they also provide productive opportunities for scientific advancement and capitalize on our partners’ experience. Researchers also work with several top universities and participate in research programs for national and international institutions.  They also share their technological knowledge with industrial companies.

Main Research & Development Areas


The four areas that are at the core of our current R&D efforts are:

The management and preservation of natural resources

Research on sea water desalination processes, collection of rain water or re-use of wastewaters after treatment aimed at meeting the growing need for water. The mechanization and automation of sorting processes for used materials, as well as the design of recycling processes for end of life products or factory effluents, encourage the re-use of materials found in waste at a competitive cost.

Limitation of environmental impacts

The improvement of treatment techniques for factory effluents and hazardous waste makes it possible to limit the dispersion of pollutants in the environment and better respect biodiversity and human health. As a leader in environmental services, we must set an example in reducing the impact of our activities. Efforts are therefore focused on reducing the waste generated by our facilities, reducing noise and olfactory pollution, and developing cleaner means of transportation.

Improving quality of life

The perfecting of used water decontamination and of waste management systems tailored to developing countries improves the environmental safety of non-Western cities and helps prevent epidemics from spreading on a worldwide scale. It also preserves the quality of water and thus the health of those who consume it. Along with the development of clean means of transportation, the organization of mass transportation limits greenhouse gases and atmospheric pollution. It improves living conditions in major cities and encourages economic development in developing countries.

The development of alternative energy sources

As carbon dioxide emissions continue to exceed the absorption capacity of the biosphere, the production of substitute fuels and biofuels, the recycling of biomass as energy, the development of industrial applications of fuel cells and the optimization of the performance of our waste incineration units help limit emissions of greenhouse gases. These measures also help respond to the increasing demand for energy, address the depletion of fossil fuel reserves, and further the attempts to economize hydrogen.

More than 70% of our research programs have the goal of limiting greenhouse gas emissions. Relying on an approach aimed at, first, not generating greenhouse gases, and, when that is impossible, reducing those emissions, we aim to control needs, improve processes and energy efficiency and to make use of more renewable energy sources.  We also strive to put in place processes to capture, store and upgrade greenhouse gases and anticipate future constraints resulting from climate change.

Improvements for 2007

A research platform dedicated to high-performance systems for the treatment of drinking water

In September 2007, we opened a 1000 square meter test hall near the drinking water plant of Annet-sur-Marne near Paris, France.  Dedicated to studying high-performance systems for the treatment of drinking water, it brings together almost twenty pilot projects. Reducing organic matter, as well as the inconvenience of chlorination, especially with respect to the taste of water, and undesirable byproducts and controlling emerging health risks are the main objectives.  Research relating to technological performance is combined with the energy and environmental results in order to select the most reliable processes. In particular, two kinds of treatment are studied in the hall:

Hybrid processes (traditional system plus membranes) that are grouped within the Opaline system (trademark filed by our Group): they associate ultra filtration membranes (0.01 micron pores) with absorbents, resin or activated carbon. They are currently being tested on an industrial scale to treat waters with high organic matter content.



62



Back to Contents


Nanofiltration: in this system, the pores of the membranes are ten times closer together than in hybrid systems.  Implemented for over ten years, we are seeking to optimize this system in order to reduce related energy consumption, avoid clogging and limit the impact of effluents.

A research program focused on the catchment, transport, use and storage of carbon dioxide

By 2050, we expect this solution to contribute to a 20% to 30% reduction of greenhouse gases worldwide.  It has been the subject of a research program since 2007, although we have been studying it since 2005.  The goal of this program is to create a new means of reducing our greenhouse gas emissions, increase our expertise and explore new markets, along with the ability to offer a complete range of services relating to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.  To this end, the program’s objectives are to find catchment solutions that are appropriate for the various types and sizes of facilities within our Group, to study the various transport and recycling systems adapted to the geographical position of our facilities, to establish an acceptable risk framework for this solution, and to set up pilot projects in order to enhance our expertise in catchment, transporting, recycling a nd storing of carbon dioxide.  The first on-site research pilots will be launched in 2008.  

Development and reinforcement of the bio-energy program

The use of biomass and waste (solid and liquid) as an energy source represents a solution not only for the conservation of fossil fuels but also for the promotion of renewable energies while minimizing environmental and health risks.  One of the objectives of our Research and Development department is to develop, evaluate, and provide support for the use of bio-energies, such as solid combustible waste, biogas from storage centers, mud from purification stations and biofuels.

This program was reorganized in 2007 through the creation of three major projects:  biofuels, biomass depositing and energy recycling.  Research teams were reinforced in order to implement these projects.  

A research program on atmospheric pollution modeling

A research program for atmospheric pollution modeling was launched one year ago. Its approach lies in developing software that is applicable to all of our activities, while its aim is to understand better the spreading mechanisms of atmospheric pollution, to track pollution and to gain a better understanding of emissions in order to control pollution concentration levels in the environment. The innovative aspect of this approach is that, in the future, we will be able to monitor in real time the pollutant concentrations in a given location and to make changes to our activity based on such concentrations or measures, in particular during the design and location selection phases of facilities. This model is based on exiting flows, weather conditions, topography and land use.  In the long term, controlling pollution levels by adapting exit flows will be possible using local weath er forecasts.

A research program to limit the polluting emissions of composting platforms

Studies led by our research teams aim to optimize the design of composting platforms, to control and limit their health and environmental impact and to guarantee the traceability, the agronomic quality, and the harmlessness of compost.  Our R&D teams have developed an urban organic waste composting process (sludge, household waste and the like). The modeling of windrow airing systems coupled with an innovative patented composting technique makes it possible to ensure compost purification, in addition to reducing the energy consumption of current industrial facilities as well as odors and greenhouses gas emissions.  This is particularly the case for nitrous oxide which has a global warming potential that is 310 times stronger than that of carbon dioxide.

Advances in biofuels research

Veolia Transport’s goals include encouraging the use of biofuels by helping local communities make the right choices among new energies and renewing the fleet of motor vehicles to reduce their environmental impact and greenhouse gases. To this end, our researchers have tested, evaluated and approved a biodiesel fuel called Diester, made with 30% of canola seed ester, that does not alter the performance of motors.  Particle filter tests on motors fueled by biodiesel are currently being conducted. A more widespread use of biofuels in the Veolia Transport fleets is currently being considered.  In cooperation with Veolia Propreté, researchers are currently testing a system of esterification of used oils mixed with diesel fuel, a successful example of the reuse of collected waste.



63



Back to Contents


A research program to optimize the electric consumption of street railways

Non-polluting, silent, environmentally friendly and high-service, street railways have been making a comeback since the 1990’s. However, on street railway networks, electricity consumption is a variable that has not yet been completely mastered. With the help of the research conducted on the Rouen and St-Etienne networks, Veolia Transport’s Research and Innovation Center has prepared a complete energy assessment of the equipment tested.  For example, it has identified the amount of electricity used by heating systems in the winter, as well as the effect of driving on a vehicle’s electricity consumption. An energy conservation policy will be established and the optimization of electric storage on board will be assessed.



64



Back to Contents


ITEM 4A: UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not Applicable.




65



Back to Contents


ITEM 5:

OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

The following discussion of our operations should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report. Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has adopted an accommodation permitting eligible foreign private issuers for their first year of reporting under IFRS to file two years rather than three years of statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows prepared in accordance with IFRS. The financial year 2005 is our first year of reporting under IFRS as publishedissued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and adopted byin the European Union, and this annual report on Form 20-F has been prepared in reliance on the SEC accommodation. As a result, the operating and financial review that follows covers the financial year 2005 and the comparable financial year 2004.

IFRS differ in certain significant respects from U.S. GAAP. Note 50 to our consolidated financial statements provides a description of the principal differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP for 2004 and 2005, as they relate to our company, and reconciles our shareholders’ equity and net income to U.S. GAAP as of and for each of the years ended, December 31, 2004 and 2005.

Unless otherwise indicated, the following discussion relates to our IFRS financial information.Union.

The following discussion also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those described under “Item 3. Key Information–Risk Factors.” Our results may differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements.  See “Forward-Looking Statements” at the beginning of this document for a more detailed discussion of the risks and uncertainties to which our results and financial condition are subject.

OVERVIEW


Major Developments in 20052007

Since our initial public offering, we have progressively established our independenceOverview

Our strategy of developing environmental businesses through long-term contracts enabled us to record a marked increase in activity in 2007, with a 14% increase in revenue based on current exchange rates (14.9% at constant exchange rates). This growth was accompanied by an improvement in adjusted operating income of 11.1% and been fully reorganized. In 2004,in adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the final yearparent of 22.5% (adjusted operating income and adjusted net income are non-GAAP measures that are defined under “Presentation of Information in this process, we sold our non-strategic U.S. assets as well as our stakeSection – Non-GAAP Measures”).  Operating income increased by 17.1% in 2007, and net income attributable to equity holders of the Spanish company FCC.

A strong business model

In 2005, we demonstrated that our environmental services business model, when combined with long-term contracts, can generate steady growth in profitability. Revenue roseparent increased by more than 12%, and the return on capital employed (ROCE) was more than 9%, yielding an increase in profitability consistent with a favorable risk profile.22.3%.

These performances are the result of attempts to optimize the use of resources in our businesses, to rebalance activities towardkey development choices, focusing primarily on Europe, Asia and North America in all areas, and certain Asian countries,our ability to generate savings and synergies and to developrenew our contracts.

We developed our business with large industrial companies.

Increase in synergies between2007 through new contracts and targeted acquisitions. These acquisitions enabled us to complete our business range in countries where only certain activities were represented. We significantly strengthened our position in Germany through the acquisition of Sulo (Environmental Services) and a number of smaller companies in the Energy Services sector. Similarly, we extended our presence in the United States, where we were already active in the Environmental Services, Water and Transportation sectors, through the acquisition of Thermal North America Inc, a company active in Energy Services.  In China, we benefited from local privatizations in order to add new businesses in the Water, Environmental Services and Energy Services sectors.

The “Veolia Environnement 2005” efficiency plan, which aimed to achieve €300 million in annual savings beginning in 2006, reached its objective one year early, in 2005. In 2005, annual savings totaled €284 millionfinancial crisis triggered at the levelbeginning of operating income and €20 millionthe summer by difficulties in the sub-prime lending market did not have a significant impact on us in 2007, particularly with respect to our liquidity and financing capacity.  The broader economic effects of the other components of net income.crisis, in particular in the United States, did not impact our activities in 2007. The plan was a success in part because the resourcesstrengthening of our  various businesses were pooled.financial structure through a €2.6 billion share capital increase completed on July 10, 2007 and our standard long-term financing policy protected us against fluctuations in the credit market, despite a slight increase in net financing costs.

A new milestone was also achievedNew commercial success within growth markets

We won several major contracts in November 20052007:

In January 2007, Veolia Eau won its 21st contract in China. This contract for a 30-year concession with the roll-outLanzhou Water Supply Company in the capital of a new branding program,  which will bring our water, waste management and transportation divisions together under a single name: Veolia.  This new brand roll-out will support our common sales and marketing efforts and will help to better integrate service offerings, which is expected to further enhance our existing multi-services offering.Gansu province, represents total cumulative revenue estimated at €1.6 billion.

Forward-looking choices

In 2005, we pursuedJanuary 2007, Veolia Eau won a contract to build, finance and consolidated our research and development efforts. Scientific and technical expertiseoperate a reverse osmosis seawater desalination plant in the Sultanate of Oman. This 22-year contract represents total cumulative revenue estimated at €434 million, including revenue from all businesses were pooled, and new, cross-disciplinary research programs were launched (sludge processing, legionella, etc.).

In France, several new training programs were instituted for all employee categories, following the signing of a company-wide agreement on skills development. Additional resources were obtained through the pooling of funds earmarked for this purpose. Moreover, in September 2005, we launched the “Veolia Skills” program, which led to 2,650 new employees being hired under work-study degree programs. This program will be renewed and expanded in 2006.

Refocused on our core businesses, we continued to grow

The most important event affecting 2005 revenue was the finalizationconstruction of the acquisition of the Braunschweig contract, relating to water, heating, gas and electricity distribution. This contract represents an investment of €374 million in order to acquire a 74.9% stake and generated revenue of €349.6 million in 2005. new plant.

At the end of 2005, we alsoJanuary 2007, Veolia Propreté won a related wastewater treatment contract which will generate additional revenueto operate a waste-to-energy facility in 2006.

We also won other contracts during 2005 that will begin to affect revenue and income as they are progressively implemented:

·

In March 2005, Veolia Environmental Services was awarded the only electricity production project relying on biogas collection and recovery from household and non-hazardous industrial waste in the “Biomass Biogas” competitive bid organized by the French Ministry for Industry and theCommission de Régulation de l'Electricité (CRE) to promote renewable energies. ThePinellas, Florida. This 17-year contract was signed for a period of 16 years, with operations expected to begin at the end of 2006 (estimatedrepresents total cumulative revenue estimated at €356 million.

On March 15, 2007, as part of €160 million).

·

In March 2005, PSA Peugeot Citroën entrusted us with environmental services management at its new Trnava facilitya consortium, Veolia Eau won a contract to design, build, operate and maintain a reverse osmosis seawater desalination plant in Slovakia. This contract was signed for a period of 8 years, with operations expected to beginCampo de Dalias, in early 2006 (estimatedsouthern Spain, representing total cumulative revenue of nearly €65 million). In December 2005,estimated at approximately €128 million for the scope of services to be managed by our company was expanded, when PSA awarded us the management of rail traffic on the private branch line to the Trnava automobile plant. This new service will begin in July 2006.

·

In March 2005, the York Regional Transit Authority choseconsortium and total consolidated revenue estimated at €78 million for Veolia Transportation to operate the express right-of-way bus network in this suburb of Toronto (Ontario, Canada) for a period of 5 years (estimated total cumulative revenue of approximately €54 million).

·

In June 2005, Veolia Water won the operating contract for water services granted by the Hradec Kralove water company, the public water authority of Eastern Bohemia (Czech Republic). This 30-year contract involves the production and distribution of drinking water, management of customer relationships, as well as wastewater collection and treatment (estimated total cumulative revenue of approximately €560 million).

·

During 2005, Veolia Water purchased various contracts from ENEL for €36 million. They generated revenue from ordinary activities of €33.8 million in 2005.

·

In July 2005, Veolia Environmental Services was included in the final phase of competitive bids for a 26-year integrated management contract covering household waste for Nottinghamshire (UK). Cumulative revenue under the contract, which is expected to be finalized and signed in June 2006, is expected to total approximately €1.2 billion.Eau.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 3366



Back to contentsContents


·

In April 2007, Veolia Transport, as part of a consortium, won a 30-year contract to operate Leslys, the future tramway line between the city of Lyon and its airport Saint Exupéry; this contract represents total cumulative revenue estimated at €360 million.

In April 2007, Veolia Eau signed a new contract to design, build and operate one of the largest water treatment plants in the United States. This contract to expand the capacity of a regional surface water treatment plant in Tampa Bay, Florida, represents total cumulative revenue estimated at €108 million.

In April 2007, Dalkia won its first contract to operate and develop a heating network in China, to serve the town of Jiamusi, in Heilongjiang province. This 25-year contract represents total cumulative revenue estimated at €1 billion.

On May 7, 2007, Veolia Eau won a new contract in Japan to operate and maintain the wastewater treatment plant of Chiba, near Tokyo. This 3-year contract represents total cumulative revenue estimated at €17.8 million.

In May 2005,2007, Dalkia took over the contract to build and operate the southwest district heating network in Harbin, the capital of Heilongjiang province located in the northeast of China. This initial transaction represents an investment of €70 million, and anticipated revenue for the first year of operation is €19 million.

On June 5, 2007, theConseil d’Etat (the highest French administrative court) issued a ruling in favor of SNCM. The public service delegation contract was awarded on June 7, 2007, effective July 1, 2007, for a term of six and a half years and represents total cumulative revenue estimated at €1.2 billion.

On June 14, 2007, Veolia Environmental ServicesEau won its 22nd contract in China. This 30-year contract for the comprehensive management of the drinking water public service and the Chinese environmental services company Shenzhen Dongjiang Environmental formedoperation of a joint venturewastewater treatment plant in the leading economic city of Haikou, the capital of Hainan Island in southern China, represents total cumulative revenue estimated at €776 million.

On June 28, 2007, Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies, through its subsidiary SIDEM, was selected to design and build in Saudi Arabia one of the largest desalination plants in the world. Considered of national importance, the plant will provide 800,000m3/day of desalinated water to the industrial city of Jubail and a province of Saudi Arabia (Marafiq) - a desert region facing massive industrialization plans and a growing population. This contract represents total cumulative revenue estimated at USD945 million (€647 million).

In June 2007, Veolia Transport won a 10-year contract to operate the ninth line of the Seoul subway. Total cumulative revenue from this contract is estimated at €400 million.

On July 18, 2007, Veolia Eau won a major contract to design, build, operate and maintain a reverse osmosis desalination plant in Sydney, Australia. This contract, which seeks to provide a secure and reliable supply of drinking water to the city of Sydney, represents total cumulative revenue estimated at €540 million.

On August 29, 2007, Veolia Eau won a USD805 million (€547 million) contract to build a desalination plant in the United Arab Emirates. The plant will be built by SIDEM (a subsidiary of Veolia Eau) and will be located in Qidfa, in the Emirate of Fujairah.

On August 30, 2007, Veolia Propreté was selected by Shropshire Waste Partnership (UK) to provide integrated waste management services. This 27-year contract represents total cumulative revenue estimated at €1,030 million.

On September 27, 2007, Veolia Eau was selected to supply drinking water to 3 million inhabitants of Tianjin, a city enjoying one of the highest economic growth rates in China. The 30-year contract represents total cumulative revenue estimated at €2.5 billion.

On October 1, 2007, Dalkia announced the signature of a contract for the design, construction and 30-year operationcomprehensive management of a future hazardous waste treatment center for the province of Guandong. Revenue from thelargest hospital complex in Brazil. This 15-year contract is expected torepresents total €197 million.

·

In December 2005, Veolia Environmental Services won a 30-year concession from the municipality of Foshan (China) involving the financing, construction and operation of a new household waste landfill (estimated total cumulative revenue of approximately €270 million).€186 million.

·

In August 2005,2007, Veolia Energy Services (Dalkia) agreed to purchase the company that manages the district heating network of the city of Lodz (Poland) and that produces heat and electricity by cogeneration. ZEC Lodz has annual revenue estimated at €167 million.

·

In June and September 2005, Veolia Water won three water service contracts in China for estimated total cumulative revenues of approximately €990 million, with contract terms ranging from 23 to 30 years (Urumqi, Handan and Changzhou).

·

In July 2005, Arjo Wiggins, the creative and technical paper manufacturer, awarded Veolia Energy Services (Dalkia)Propreté signed a 12-year contract to build and operate a new steam productionwaste storage facility on its site at Wizernes in northern France (estimatedSouth-East China. This 30-year concession represents total cumulative revenue of approximately €135 million). The new facility is expected to begin operations on November 1, 2006.estimated at €92 million.

·

In November 2005,2007, Veolia WaterTransport won the water managementferry service contract for the city of Kunming (southwest China). Awarded through an international call for tenders, this 30-yearMorbihan Islands (Groix, Belle-Ile-en-Mer, Houat and Houëdic) in France. This 7-year contract started on January 1, 2008 and represents estimated total cumulative revenue of more than €1.1 billion. Operations are expectedestimated at €154 million.



67



Back to begin in 2006.Contents

·

In

On December 2005,6, 2007, Veolia Water signedEau won a water management contract with the city of Yerevan, the capital of Armenia. Awarded through an international call for tenders, this 10-year contract in the United States to manage the wastewater system serving a population of 1.1 million in the greater Milwaukee area. This contract represents estimated total cumulative revenue of approximately €160estimated at €272 million.

During 2005, we

On December 21, 2007, Veolia Eau won a second contract for the operation and maintenance of the Fujairah IWPP desalination plant in the United Arab Emirates. This operating and maintenance contract is for a 12-year period, beginning in the summer of 2010 and represents total cumulative revenue estimated at €71 million.

We also strengthened our position in certain regions of the worldas a market leader through acquisitions:targeted acquisitions generating growth and cost synergies:

·

In January 2005,North America (Canada), Veolia Transportation acquired half of Dortmunder Eisenbahn (DE) in GermanyPropreté purchased Ecolocycle for €3.4 million, obtaining control of the company’s operations. This acquisition gives Veolia Transportation the opportunity to become the largest private freight operator in Germany, in particular in the steel sector.€19.2 million;

·

In September 2005,the Asia-Pacific region, Veolia Transportation acquired the North American transportation company ATCPropreté purchased Cleanaway Asia for €77.7 million, generating revenue of €74.8 million over the last four months of 2005.€23.2 million;

·

In October 2005,the Central European area, Veolia Environmental Services took control of the hazardous waste business of Shanks, a UK company,Energie purchased Pannon Power in Hungary for €43 million. The acquired activities include waste collection, preparation, transfer, processing and energy recovery from liquid and solid hazardous wastes.

Finally, Veolia Energy Services (Dalkia) has played an early role€75.2 million, Kolin in the greenhouse gas emissions market in Europe, in particular France, the Czech Republic Lithuaniafor €27.7 million and Estonia. Sinesco in Hungary for €26.4 million.

On April 27, 2007, Veolia Environnement announced the signature of an agreement to acquire Sulo, the German number two in waste management and market leader in the collection of municipal waste and packaging, for an enterprise value of €1,450 million (including financial debt). An agreement was signed on July 29, 2007 to sell the ET Division (manufacture of plastic containers) of Sulo, considered non-core, for an amount of €172 million (including financial debt). The acquisition was finalized on July 2, 2007 and had an impact of €627.6 million on revenue for the year ended December 31, 2007;

On May 31, 2007, Veolia Propreté announced the signature of an agreement for the acquisition of a controlling interest in TMT, an Italian subsidiary of Termomeccanica Ecologica specialized in waste management and treatment. The transaction concerns 75% of the shares based on an enterprise value (100%) of €338 million. This acquisition was finalized on October 3, 2007;

On June 12, 2007, Veolia Energie signed an agreement to acquire Thermal North America, Inc., a privately owned company with the largest portfolio of district heating and cooling networks in the United States, for an enterprise value of USD788 million. The acquisition was finalized on December 12, 2007;

On August 9, 2007, Veolia Eau signed an agreement to purchase the non-regulated activities of Thames Water in the United Kingdom for an enterprise value of €233 million. This acquisition, which was finalized on November 28, 2007, will enable Veolia Eau to participate in the construction and management of major Private Finance Initiatives (PFI) in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland;

On August 24, 2007, Veolia Propreté signed an agreement to acquire the solid waste treatment business of Allied Waste Industries in the United States, for an enterprise value of €71 million;  

On December 24, 2007, Veolia Eau purchased the assets of the Process Services Division of Tetra Technologies. This acquisition seeks to expand Veolia’s petroleum refinery waste treatment activities in the United States.


We havealso pursued our development strategy in 2007 in new businesses that are directly linked to our areas of expertise:

On July 1, 2007, Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies purchased Anox Kaldnes, a company with expertise in biological wastewater treatment.

On October 29, 2007, Veolia Environnement purchased 50% of the share capital of Eolfi, a company specialized in wind-turbine energy, through an emission rights surplus€18 million reserved share capital increase.

On November 20, 2007, Veolia Propreté signed an agreement to purchase the Bartin Group (Bartin Recycling Group), one of the leading French operators in waste recovery and do not expect to berecycling, which reported revenue of €249 million in a negative2006. This acquisition, combined with recycling activities already purchased in Germany, considerably strengthens Veolia Propreté’s position in the medium-term.Western Europe recycling market. This acquisition was finalized on February 13, 2008.

The thorough

68



Back to Contents


We continued our portfolio review during 2007 and made a number of partial and total divestitures, which did not materially impact our operating capacity:

the sale of certain assets continuedowned by recently acquired companies and not included in 2005

In 2005, our principal divestitures werethe development plan, such as follows:

·

Veolia Water sold its minority shareholdingthe Fawley incinerator in Acque Potabili in Italythe United Kingdom for €20.9€36 million and the balanceSulo ET division (manufacture of plastic containers) for €172 million;

the continuation of our partnership in Central Europe with the EBRD which acquired a 10 % stake in the water division company, Veolia Voda (Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland, etc.), through a €90 million reserved share capital increase;

the acquisition by the International Finance Company (IFC) and Société de Promotion et de Participation pour la Coopération Economique (PROPARCO) of a 19.45% stake in Veolia Water AMI, the holding company for water division activities in Africa, the Middle East and the Indian sub-continent.

the disposal by the transportation division of its stakeactivities in Bonna Sabla for €35.8 million.

·

Veolia Energy Services (Dalkia) sold its nuclear maintenance business in the first quarter of 2005 for €17 million.

·

In the first half of 2005, Veolia Transportation finalized the sale of CBM, a company that sells spare parts for buses, for €31.5 million.

In 2005, we also sold other industrial assets and stakes for a total of €242.9 million.

Moody’s upgrades its rating

Following its annual review, the Moody’s rating agency upgraded our long-term debt rating from Baa1 to A3 in June 2005.

Developments in our partnership with EDF regarding Dalkia

Under the terms of a partnership agreement signed in December 2000, EDF held a call option enabling it to increase its investment in Dalkia to 50%, provided that a number of conditions were met.

The conditions of this option were clarified in an amendment to the agreement signed by EDF and our companyDenmark on April 19, 2005. This amendment stated in particular that EDF had until JulyAugust 31, 2005 to exercise this option and that the option would only be considered definitively exercised at the date of conclusion by the parties of a formal agreement covering in particular the reorganization of their relationship under their industrial and commercial agreement and their rights and obligations under the shareholders’ agreement, including governance rules. This formal agreement had to be concluded by September 30, 2005 at the latest.

In this context, EDF exercised its call option on July 28, 2005 as a precautionary measure. However, in the absence of a formal agreement covering amendments to our industrial and commercial agreement and the shareholders’ agreement, the option became null and void as of October 1, 2005. Assuming that no other EDF competitor takes control of our company, EDF no longer holds any call options in respect of Dalkia2007 and its subsidiaries.activities in Spain (with the exception of certain contracts including the Barcelona tramway) on November 9, 2007.

The original partnership agreement remains unchanged,Finally, we brought partners in as equity investors in certain consolidated subsidiaries, in order to optimize commercial development opportunities or reduce risk, particularly in China and we and EDF have confirmed our intention to work together to take advantage of any new opportunities in the European energy market.Morocco.

Presentation of Information in this Section

Definition of “organic” and “external” growth

As used in this report, the term “organic growth” includes growth resulting from new contracts won and the expansion of an existing contractual arrangements through increasescontract, particularly resulting from an increase in prices and/or volumes delivered.  We also frequently offer, indelivered or processed, new contracts and the courseacquisition of bidding on a contract, to acquire operating assets relatedattributed to the performance of the contract. As a result, our organic growth also includes acquisitions of assets for dedicated use in a particular projectcontract or contract.  project.

The term “external growth” relates toincludes growth resulting fromthrough acquisitions, (netnet of divestitures)divestitures, of entities that hold multiple contracts and/or assets used in one or more markets.


Non-GAAP Measures

We use a number of non-GAAP financial measures to manage our business and to supplement our financial information presented in accordance with IFRS.  Non-GAAP financial measures exclude amounts that are in the nearest IFRS measures, or include amounts that are not in the nearest IFRS measures.  We discuss below the non-GAAP financial measures that we use, the reasons why we believe they provide useful information and the location in this Section where they are reconciled to the nearest IFRS measures.  You should not place undue reliance on non-GAAP financial measures or regard them as a substitute for the nearest IFRS measures.  Further, these non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.

The non-GAAP financial measures that we use in this section are the following:

Adjusted operating income” and “adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent” are equal to operating income and net income attributable to equity holders of the parent, respectively, adjusted to exclude the impact of impairment charges and certain items that are “non-recurring.”   An item is “non-recurring” if it is unlikely to recur during each period and if it substantially changes the economics of one or more cash-generating units.  We do not classify an item as “non-recurring” if the nature of the relevant charge or gain is such that it is reasonably likely to recur within two years, or there was a similar charge or gain within the prior two years.  We believe that adjusted operating income and adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent are useful measurement tools because th ey show the results of our operations without regard to:

impairment charges, which we record when we determines that the value of a cash generating unit is less than its carrying value (as discussed under “—Critical Accounting Policies – Asset Impairment”), and which are different from our other items of revenues and expenses used to determine operating income as they depend on management’s assessment of the future potential of a cash generating unit, rather than its results of operations in the period in question, and

non-recurring items, which by their nature are unlikely to be indicative of future trends in our results of operations.  



69



Back to Contents


In addition, we use adjusted operating income as a tool to manage our business, for purposes of evaluating our performance, allocating resources internally and as one factor in determining the variable compensation of our senior executives.  See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees – Compensation.” “Adjusted operating income” and “Adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent” are reconciled to operating income and net income attributable to equity holders of the parent, in each case for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007 under “—Results of Operations – Year ended December 31, 2007 compared to Year ended December 31, 2006” and “—Results of Operations – Year ended December 31, 2006 compared to Year ended December 31, 2005.”  

Net financial debt” represents gross financial debt (long-term borrowings, short-term borrowings, bank overdrafts and other cash position items), net of cash and cash equivalents and excluding fair value adjustments to derivatives hedging debt.  We use net financial debt as an indicator to monitor our overall liquidity position, and as one factor in determining the variable compensation of our senior executives.  Our net financial debt is reconciled to our gross financial debt in “—Liquidity and Capital Resources – Source of Funds – Financings.”

ROCE” or “Return on Capital Employed” is a measurement tool that we use to manage the profitability of our contracts globally and to make investment decisions.  ROCE is the ratio of (i) our results of operations, net of tax, and our share of net income of associates excluding revenue from operational financial assets, divided by (ii) the average amount of capital employed in our business during the same year.  Each of these terms is defined, and is reconciled to the nearest IFRS measure, under “—Liquidity and Capital Resources – Capital Expenditures – Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)”.

Critical Accounting Policiesaccounting policies

We prepare our consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRS as publishedissued by the IASB and adopted by the European Union. Our consolidated financial statements are affected by the accounting policies used and the estimates, judgments and assumptions made by management during their preparation. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the periods presented.

The principal significant estimates and assumptions made by management during the preparation of our consolidated financial statements relate to the accounting policies used in connection with pension liabilities, asset impairment, deferred taxes and derivative financial instruments.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 34



Back to contents


Pension Liabilities  

We maintain several pension plans, and determinemeasure our obligations under these plans using a projected unit credit method, which requires us to estimate the probabilities that our employees will continue to work for our companyprobability of personnel remaining with us until retirement, the foreseeable changes in thefuture compensation of our employees and the present value of our potential liabilitiesits liability on the basis of the appropriate discount rate for each countrymonetary zone in which we maintain a pension plan.  As a result, we record pension-related assets or liabilities in our accounts and we record the related net expenses over the estimated term of service of our employees.

In accordance with IFRS requirements, we use market yields of high quality corporate bonds with a maturity similar in duration to the pension liabilities to determine the discount rate at the balance sheet date when available.  If no such market yields are available, then we use the yields on government bonds with a maturity similar in duration to the liabilities. We estimate future compensation based on inflation rates estimated using a combination of the spread between index linked and non-index linked bonds, current inflation rates, and published statements of central banks and economists with respect to inflation prospects. We use mortality tables published by national statistical agencies in our evaluations, reviewed periodically to ensure that the latest available tables are being used.  The assumptions used to measure pension liabilities as of December 31, 2007 are described in Note 32 to the consolidated financial statements.

As of December 31, 2007, a 1% increase in the discount rate would have decreased our aggregate pension benefit obligation by €248 million and our current service costs by €14 million.  A 1% decrease in the discount rate would have increased the benefit obligation by €293 million and the current service costs by €14 million.

As of December 31, 2007, a 1% increase in the inflation rate would have increased our aggregate pension benefit obligation by €226 million and our current service costs by €6 million.  A 1% decrease in the inflation rate would have decreased the benefit obligation by €193 million and the current service costs by €6 million.



70



Back to Contents


Asset Impairment

We perform an annual review of our goodwill and other intangible assets during our strategiclong-term planning in mid-year, or more frequently when there is an indication of an impairment loss. If the long-term prospects of an activity appear durably downgraded, we estimate the value of the impairment based either on the fair value less selling costs of the assets related to this activity in cases where we decide to dispose of the activity, or on the higher of fair value less selling costs or value in use, in cases where we decide to retain the activity.  We then record a one-time write-off or write-down of the carrying value of our goodwill to bring it in line with our estimates.    Fair

When we use fair value less selling costs, iswe estimate the fair value based on earnings multiples appearing in brokers’ reports or on published information regarding similar transactions.  Our estimate could be significantly different from the multiples method (brokers’ surveys)actual sales price that we could receive in connection with the disposal of the activity.  In addition, actual selling costs could be greater or recent similar transactions method.  Value inless than the estimate.

When we use is based on the discounted future cash flows method.method to estimate value in use, we estimate future cash flows of business units known as “cash generating units,” and we apply a discount rate to the estimated future cash flows.   A cash-generating unit is generally a business segment (i.e., water, waste, energy or transport) in a given country.  Our future cash flow estimates are based on the forecasts in our latest long-term plan, plus an appropriate growth rate applied after the period covered by the plan.   The discount rate is equal to the risk free rate plus a risk premium weighted for business-specific risks relating to each asset, cash-generating unit or group of cash-generating units.  

As of December 31, 2007, a 1% increase in the discount rate applied to each cash generating unit would have resulted in an increased goodwill impairment charge of approximately €52 million, and a 1% decrease in the perpetual growth rate applied to each cash generating unit would have resulted in an increased goodwill impairment charge of approximately €27 million.   

Deferred Taxes  

We recognize deferred tax assets for deductible temporary differences, tax loss carry-forwards and/or tax credit carry-forwards.  We recognize deferred tax liabilities for taxable temporary differences. We adjust our deferred tax assets and liabilities for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the enactment date. Deferred tax balances are not discounted.

A deferred tax asset is recognized to the extent that we are likely to generate sufficient future taxable profits against which the asset can be offset. Deferred tax assets are impaired to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available.

Financial Instruments

The recognition and measurement of financial assets and liabilities is governed by IAS 39,Financial instruments: recognition and measurement.  Financial assets are classified as available-for-sale, held to maturity, assets at fair value through profit and loss,asset derivative instruments, loans and receivables and cash and cash equivalents.  Financial liabilities include borrowings, other financing and bank overdrafts, liability derivative instruments and operating payables.  These categories and their implications for our consolidated financial statements are described in Note 1.14 to our consolidated financial statements.

The determination of the proper classification of financial instruments requires management to exercise judgment, and depends in part on our intention regarding a given financial instrument, which is subject to change. Certain financial instruments (particularly derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting, as described below) are recorded in our consolidated balance sheet at fair value, and the change in fair value from one period to the next is recorded in our consolidated income statement as part of financial income and expense.  Certain other financial instruments are recorded at fair value with the change from one period to the next recorded directly in equity, with the change released to the income statement upon sale or impairment.  Certain other instruments are carried on the balance sheet at amortized cost basis and subjected to impairment testing.  Our determ ination regarding the classification of a financial instrument can have a material impact on our results of operations and our consolidated shareholders equity.




71



Back to Contents


Derivative Financial Instruments

We use various derivative instruments to manage our exposure to interest rate and foreign exchange risks resulting from our operating, financial and investment activities. Certain transactions performed in accordance with our risk management policy do not satisfy hedge accounting criteria and are recorded as trading instruments.

Derivative instruments are recognized in the balance sheet at fair value. Other than the exceptions detailed below, changes in the fair value of derivative instruments are recorded through the income statement. The fair value of derivatives is estimated using standard valuation models, which take into account active market data.

Net gains and losses on instruments recorded at fair value through profit or loss include flows exchanged and the change in the value of the instrument.

Derivative instruments may be classified as one of three types of hedging relationship: fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or net investment hedge in a foreign operation:

·

a fair value hedge is a hedge of exposure to changes in fair value of a recognized asset or liability, or an identified portion of such an asset or liability, that is attributable to a particular risk (in particular interest rate or foreign exchange risk), and could affect net income for the period;

·

a cash flow hedge is a hedge of exposure to variability in cash flows that is attributable to a particular risk associated with a recognized asset or liability or a highly probable forecast transaction (such as a planned purchase or sale) and could affect net income for the period;

·

a net investment hedge in a foreign operation hedges the exposure to foreign exchange risk of the net assets of a foreign operation including loans considered part of the investment (IAS 21).

An asset, liability, firm commitment, future cash-flow or net investment in a foreign operation qualifies for hedge accounting if:

·

the hedging relationship is precisely defined and documented at the inception date;

·

the effectiveness of the hedge is demonstrated at inception and by regular verification of the offsetting nature of movements in the market value of the hedging instrument and the hedged item. The ineffective portion of the hedge is systematically recognized in financial items.

The use of hedge accounting has the following consequences:

·

in the case of fair value hedges of existing assets and liabilities, the hedged portion of these items is measured at fair value in the balance sheet. The gain or loss on remeasurement is recognized in the income statement, where it is offset against matching gains or losses arising on the fair value remeasurement of the hedging financial instrument, to the extent it is effective;

·

in the case of cash flow hedges, the portion of the gain or loss on the fair value remeasurement of the hedging instrument that is determined to be an effective hedge is recognized directly in equity, while the gain or loss on the fair value remeasurement of the underlying item is not recognized in the balance sheet. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognized in the income statement.recognized. Gains or losses recognized in equity are released to the income statement in line with the recording ofsame period or periods in which the items hedged;assets acquired or liabilities impact the income statement;

·

in the case of net investment hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognized in translation reserves in equity, while the ineffective portion is recognized in the income statement. Gains and losses recognized in translation reserves are released to the income statement when the foreign operation is sold.

Exemptions to IFRS

As a first-time adopter of IFRS, we have elected to follow certain exemptions to IFRS as permitted by IFRS 1 “First time adoption of International Reporting Standards”, section 13. These exemptions are described below.

Business combinations

In accordance with the provisions of IFRS 1, we have elected not to restate business combinations that occurred prior to January 1, 2004. We believe that a restatement of business combinations would not have had a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

Cumulative unrecognized actuarial gains and losses

In accordance with the provisions of IFRS 1, we have elected to record unrecognized actuarial gains and losses relating to pension and post-retirement and other employee and post-employment benefit obligations against consolidated equity as of January 1, 2004. The application of this option resulted in a €124 million decrease in our shareholders’ equity as of January 1, 2004.

As of January 1, 2004, the restatement of actuarial losses and past service cost in the transitional statement of financial position resulted in a decrease in the related cost recognized in our earnings from operations, which represented savings of €1 million in our IFRS statement of earnings for 2004. Please refer to Note 48 to our consolidated financial statements.

Cumulative translation adjustments

In accordance with the provisions of IFRS 1, we have elected to offset the accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments against retained earnings as of January 1, 2004. Foreign currency translation adjustments result from the translation into euros of the financial statements of subsidiaries whose functional currency is not the euro. Consequently, upon divestiture of the subsidiaries, affiliates or joint ventures whose functional currency is not the euro, these adjustments are not recorded as earnings.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 35



Back to contents


Revaluation of certain intangible assets and property, plant and equipment at fair value

We have chosen not to apply the option provided in IFRS 1, allowing the valuation of certain intangible assets and property, plant and equipment at their fair value as of January 1, 2004.

Accounting for concessions

Because ofConcession agreements are accounted for in accordance with IFRIC 12,Service Concession Arrangements, published in November 2006. This interpretation, whose adoption by the nature of our activities, we have commitmentsEuropean Union is still under several concession contractsdiscussion, is applicable to periods beginning on or after January 1, 2008. In fiscal year 2006, Veolia Environnement elected to adopt IFRIC 12 early, and this change in all of our divisions and in most of the countries where we operate. In early 2005, when we prepared our first set of IFRS-compliant financial statements, we largely maintained our historical accounting treatment for concession contracts, while restating, to a limited extent, certain presentations that did not comply with then-existing IFRS. We did so with the expectation that the International Financial Reporting Interpretation Committee (IFRIC) would soon publish a draft interpretation to harmonize the application of IFRS to concession accounting.

In March 2005, IFRIC published Draft Interpretations D12, D13 and D14, the contents of which are summarized in Note 1-20 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report. Nevertheless, as of March 2006, IFRIC’s workmethod was still ongoing, and definitive versions of the interpretations are not expected to be published before the third quarter of 2006.

For the financial year 2005, given the very high number of contracts affected by these draft interpretations, we have decided to isolate the assets related to concession contracts on a distinct line, entitled “Publicly-owned utility networks.” Concession assets are amortized on the basis of their useful life,applied retrospectively in accordance with IAS 38, “Intangible assets,” and IAS 16, “Property, Plant and Equipment.” Maintenance and repair expenses deriving from contractual obligations8 on concession assets accounted for under IAS 38 are analyzedchanges in accordance with IAS 37 “Provisions.” If necessary, provisions are recorded in respect of those obligations. This presentation complies with existing standards and has not had a significant impact on our shareholders’ equity or net income.

Foraccounting method. As such, the financial year 2006, we have decided to implement the draft interpretations published by IFRIC, even though their adoption is still uncertain. We believe that these draft interpretations constitute an advancement in the application of IFRS and a sufficient basis for changing the accounting presentation of the related assets. As a result, we have undertaken a detailed review of our very large portfolio of contracts, a project that will extend over several months. Subject to further changes, we intend to adopt the draft interpretations for the first time in 2006.

Change in the definition of reporting unit under U.S. GAAP

Between 2000, the year of our creation, and the end of 2003, our company was organized into five divisions and consequently into five operating segments: Water, Waste Management, Energy Services, Transportation and FCC (a group specialized in public works and in the production of cement, proportionally consolidated under primary GAAP and accounted for under the equity method under U.S. GAAP).

The analysis by reporting unit was driven by the presence of US Filter and FCC until the sale of these entities. Both entities had been recently acquired (in 1999 and 1998, respectively) by Vivendi Universal, had specific risk profits and were subsequently sold in 2004. Therefore, in the Water division, we identified two reporting units: (i) USFilter, an industrial group that produced water-related equipment for private and commercial customers and which was managed separately from the rest of the Group, and (ii) Water - Rest of the World, the business of which consisted mostly of managing concessions on behalf of public customers. We identified three other reporting units, Waste Management, Energy Services and Transportation, which had homogenous business lines given their management of concessions on behalf of public clients. Finally, we identified Latin America as a reporting unit relating to activit ies that we consolidated, in respect of which FCC was the second shareholder. Accordingly, depreciation tests by reporting unit reflected this reality.

Following the sale of US Filter and FCC in connection with our strategy to refocus on concessions, we underwent a major internal reorganization in 2004 and 2005 on the basis of operating units, mainly organized around a dual analysis by geographical zone and by reporting segment. We believe that these operating units coincide with the definition of reporting unit as set forth in FAS 142:  

-

the operating unit is one level below an operating segment (water, waste, energy, transportation);

-

each operating unit has its own chief operating officer;

-

at the level of each operating unit, there are similar contractual arrangements and operating methods with public authorities which are the main clients;

-

the operating unit constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results of the operating unit.

OurVeolia Environnement financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005 are the first ones published since the reorganization that occurred in 2004 and 2005.

Given the completion in 2005 of our operating reorganization in 2004, we considered the impairment test for 2004 on the basis of reporting unit definitions that we apply for 2005. As a result, net income and shareholder's equity under U.S. GAAP in 2004 have been restated by an amount of €69.3 million as a result of the impairment of Transportation North Europe and Energy Netherlands (see Note 50D. to our consolidated financial statements).

U.S. GAAP Reconciliation

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS, which differs in certain respects from U.S. GAAP. The following table shows our net income (loss) and shareholders’ equity under IFRS and U.S. GAAP (restated for 2004 as described above)were adjusted for the periods indicated:

 

At and for the year ended
December 31,

 

————

————

(millions of euros)

2005

2004

 

————

————

Net Income (Loss)

  

IFRS

623.0

391.5

U.S. GAAP

555.7

145.2

   

Shareholders’ Equity

  

IFRS

3,802.6

3,222.8

U.S. GAAP

2,832.9

2,255.5


The most significant items in reconciling our net income (loss) under IFRS and U.S. GAAP in 2005, as reflected in Note 50 to our consolidated financial statements, were:

·

tangible asset components for €(38.1) million;

·

goodwill for €35.7 million; and

·

income tax for €(52.7) million.retrospective application of IFRIC 12.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 3672



Back to contentsContents


The most significant itemsapplication of IFRIC 12 is complex and is described in reconciling our shareholders’ equity under IFRS and U.S. GAAP in 2005, as reflecteddetail in Note 50 to our consolidated financial statements, were:

·

goodwill recorded at market value under French GAAP in connection with the transfer of certain subsidiaries and affiliates to our group in 1999 by Vivendi, our former parent company. The goodwill book value as of January 1, 2004 is the same under IFRS as it was under French GAAP, as the adoption of IFRS was prospective with respect to goodwill. Under U.S. GAAP, goodwill relating to these transfers was recorded at Vivendi’s historical cost basis. In addition, goodwill was amortized in 2002 and 2003 under French GAAP, but not under U.S. GAAP.  The net effect on goodwill amounted to €(988.1) million at December 31, 2005;

·

actuarial gains and losses on pension plans recognized immediately in equity under IFRS, while deferred and amortized under U.S. GAAP.  A minimum liability adjustment would be recognized only under U.S. GAAP. The difference between IFRS and U.S. GAAP amounted to €295.8 million at December 31, 2005;

·

amortization of tangible assets by component under IFRS only, which has an effect of €(180.9) million; and

·

maintenance and repair costs, which are accrued in advance for specific contracts under IFRS and expensed as incurred under U.S. GAAP. The impact on shareholders’ equity amounted to €139.5 million at December 31, 2005.

For a more detailed discussion of the significant differences between IFRS and US GAAP as applied to our company, see Note 501.20 to our consolidated financial statements.  As a general matter, a contract is considered a concession agreement under IFRIC 12 if a public sector customer (the “grantor”) controls or regulates the services that we must provide with the infrastructure that we use, to whom the services must be provided and at what price, and if the grantor controls a significant residual interest in the infrastructure.  Pursuant to IFRIC 12, the infrastructure used in a concession is not considered to be part of our property, plant and equipment, but instead we recognize financial assets or intangible assets (depending on the nature of our payment rights) in respect of the concession contracts.  

Discontinued operations

Following a decision to dispose of the Danish activities of the transportation division in 2007, the results of this business were transferred to net income from discontinued operations in accordance with IFRS 5 on operations held for sale, and the 2005 and 2006 financial statements were restated accordingly. The 2006 disposal of Southern Water was also recorded in accordance with IFRS 5, and the 2005 financial statements were restated accordingly.




73



Back to Contents


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Year ended December 31, 20052007 compared to year ended December 31, 20042006

Revenue

Overview

We generated revenue of €25,244.9 million in 2005, an increase of 12.2% from revenue of €22,500.3 million in 2004. Positive currency effects of €180.9 million resulted from appreciation in the currencies of certain Eastern European countries (€89.2 million), the U.S. dollar (€13.9 million) and certain Asian currencies. Organic growth was 9.2%. Revenue from outside France amounted to €12,991.2 million, or 51.5% of total revenue.

The following table shows a breakdown of our revenue:revenue in 2006 and 2007:

2005(in € millions)

2004(in € millions)

% change 2005/2004

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

25,244.9

22,500.3

 +12.2%

+9.2%

+2.2%

+0.8%

2007

(in € millions)

2006

(in € millions)

% change 2007/2006

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

32,628.2

28,620.4

14.0%

7.8%

7.1%

(0.9)%


Veolia Environnement's consolidated revenue for the year ended December 31, 2007 amounted to €32,628.2 million compared to €28,620.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, an increase of 14.0% at current exchange rates and 14.9% at constant exchange rates. Organic growth was 7.8%, including organic growth of 10.1% recorded outside France.

The 7.1% external growth resulted, in particular, from acquisitions made by Veolia Propreté in the United Kingdom and Germany (a contribution of approximately €1,200 million), by Veolia Energie in Europe and Australia (€254 million) and by Veolia Transport in France and the United States (€161 million). The contribution of acquisitions enabled us to accelerate our growth outside France, where revenue totaled €18,372.3 million, or 56.3% of total revenue, compared to 53.2% in 2006.

The negative impact of exchange rate movements (a negative impact of €263 million, or 0.9%) primarily reflects the weakening of the US dollar against the euro (a negative impact of €237 million).

The following table shows a breakdown of our revenue by division:division in 2006 and 2007:


(in € millions, except for %)

2005

2004

% change 2005/2004

2007

2006

% change 2007/2006

      

Water

8,888.7

7,777.4

+14.3%

10,927.4

10,087.6

8.3%

Waste Management

6,604.1

6,214.4

+6.3%

Environmental Services

9,214.3

7,462.9

23.5%

Energy Services

5,402.4

4,919.8

+9.8%

6,896.4

6,118.4

12.7%

Transportation

4,349.7

3,588.7

+21.2%

5,590.1

4,951.5

12.9%

Total revenue

25,244.9

22,500.3

+12.2%

32,628.2

28,620.4

14.0%

Total revenue at constant 2004 exchange rate

25,064.0

22,500.3

+11.4%

Total revenue at constant 2006 exchange rate

32,891.6

28,620.4

14.9%


Water


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenue within the water division:division in 2006 and 2007:


2005(in € millions)

2004(in € millions)

% change 2005/2004

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

8,888.7

7,777.4

+14.3%

+10.7%

+2.8%

+0.8%

2007

(in € millions)

2006

(in € millions)

% change 2007/2006

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

10,927.4

10,087.6

8.3%

7.9%

1.1%

(0.7)%


Our water division generated revenue of €8.9 billion in 2005, an increase of 14.3% compared with 2004.  Organic growth was 10.7%, which is primarily attributable to the following:


·

In France, the distribution business performed well, despite slightly lower volumes, and the construction business continued to grow. As a result, organic growth in revenue totaled 4.5%.the water division was 4.6% in 2007, boosted by a broader services offering and robust growth in engineering work. This performance was achieved in spite of lower volumes due in particular to cool summer weather.



74



·Back to Contents


Outside France, excluding Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies, revenue was up strongly (+19.7%10.8% in 2007 (or 10.3% at constant scope and exchange rates). In Europe, strong revenue growth (+28.4% at constant exchange rates) was driven bydespite a decrease in BOT engineering work (Brussels and The Hague), the Braunschweig contract in Germany, other new contracts signed in the last few months of 2005, in particular in the Czech Republic, as well as a five-year contract extension in the United Kingdom. In North America, revenue advanced by more than 8.3% at constant exchange rates, due to favorable revenue levels in general and the commencement of operations under a contract in Indianapolis. In the Asia-Pacific region, the start-up of the Shenzhen, Qingdao, Lugouqiao, Baoji and other contracts in China and the services business in Japan resulted in revenuedivision recorded growth of more than 25%.


·

The commencement of operationsunder several large construction and engineering contracts3.8% in France and abroad, plus the acquisition of companies in Germany and the United Kingdom, enabled Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies to record growth in revenue of nearly 24% (+8.8%2007 (2.3% at constant scope and exchange rates). reflecting the start-up of new contracts signed in 2006, in particular in Central Europe.


OurIn the Asia/Pacific region, the water division recorded externalvery strong growth in revenue of 2.8% during 2005,almost 48% in 2007 (47% at constant scope and exchange rates), largely driven by the start-up of new contracts in China (Shenzhen, Lanzhou and Kunming), Australia (Gold Coast and seawater desalination plant in Sydney), South Korea and Japan.

Business was also strong in the Africa/Middle East region, where revenues grew by 18.1% (19.3% at constant scope and exchange rates) thanks to growth in business in Morocco and the construction of a seawater desalination plant in the Sultanate of Oman.

Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies posted revenue of €1,881 million in 2007, up 12.8% compared to 2006, principally due to the strength of the "Design and Build" business for municipal and industrial customers, which was due to several factors. We made acquisitionsparticularly pronounced in the engineering sectorMiddle East (Marafiq and the industrial contract with Shell in Germany at the end of 2004 and in the United Kingdom in the third quarter of 2005, while also increasing our stake in certain Italian water companies in the second quarter of 2005.


Qatar).



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 37



Back to contents


Waste ManagementEnvironmental Services


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenuerevenues within the waste management division:environmental services (waste management) division in 2006 and 2007:


2005(in € millions)

2004(in € millions)

% change
2005/2004

of which organic growth

of which
external growth

of which
currency fluctuation

6,604.1

6,214.4

+6.3%

+5.4%

+0.1%

+0.8%

2007

(in € millions)

2006

(in € millions)

% change 2007/2006

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

9,214.3

7,462.9

23.5%

7.5%

18.0%

(2.0)%


OurIn France, revenue increased by 7.1% in 2007 (or 6.6% at constant scope) as a result of strong price increases for recycled materials (paper, metals), higher tonnages in the collection and sorting-recycling of solid waste, management division generatedwaste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) operations and the treatment of polluted soil, the increase in tonnages to landfills and the good level of business activity at incineration plants.

Outside France, we recorded 35.6% revenue of €6.6 billiongrowth in 2005, an increase of 6.3% compared with 2004.2007, including 7.9% growth at constant scope and exchange rates that came from all regions.  Organic growth was 5.4%, which is primarily attributable tosignificant in the following:


·

In France, organic growth in revenue totaled 2.4%. This growth was achieved despite a relatively unfavorable economic context, which put pressure onUnited Kingdom with the industrial non-hazardous waste segment.


·

Outside France, organic growth accelerated and reached 8.2%. Largestart-up of new integrated contracts began to contribute greater(Shropshire) and the expansion of existing integrated contracts (East Sussex and Nottinghamshire), and also in Scandinavia with an increase in the recycling business in Norway. In North America, revenues tonnage collection increaseddeclined by 0.3% as a result of the weakening of the dollar, but the business achieved growth 7.7% at constant scope and exchange rates, driven mainly by the momentum in industrial services and the incineration business.

External growth of 18.0% in 2007 mainly reflected the full-year effect of the acquisitions of Cleanaway in the United Kingdom and growth was strongBiffa in Belgium, and the Asia-Pacific regionacquisitions in particular (+18.9%2007 of Sulo (consolidated since July 2nd). In North America, new contracts were signed, toxic waste volumes were elevated in Germany and revenue was highof TMT in industrial services, leading to  revenue growth of 8.5% at constant exchange rates.


Italy.

Energy Services


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenuerevenues within the energy services division:division in 2006 and 2007:


2005(in € millions)

2004(in € millions)

% change 2005/2004

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

5,402.4

4,919.8

+9.8%

+8.9%

-

+0.9%

2007

(in € millions)

2006

(in € millions)

% change 2007/2006

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

6,896.4

6,118.4

12.7%

7.9%

4.6%

0.2%


Our energy services division generated revenueThe effects of €5.4 billionmild weather in 2005, an increasethe first months of 9.8% compared with 2004.  Organic growth was 8.9%, which is primarily attributable to2007 in Europe (where the following:bulk of our Energy Services revenues are generated) were partly offset by colder weather in the fourth quarter of 2007.



75



·Back to Contents


In France, revenue was up 7.6% organicallygrew 9.0% (8.2% at constant scope), due to commercial development and continued to benefit from thean increase in the volume of engineering work. This performance was achieved despite the impact of the mild winter weather and a slight decline in average energy prices in thermal services.


·prices.

Outside France, revenue increasedthe impact of the weather was offset by 14.6% (+11.0% organically). Growth was especially highour recent business development, which generated both organic and external growth, in particular in Central Europe (+37.8%)(Hungary, Czech Republic and Slovakia), driven,the United Kingdom, Italy and Australia. Accordingly, total growth in particular, by the full impact of new contracts in Poland (in particular Poznan and start-up at Lodz), Hungary and Romania. In Southern Europe (Spain, Italy) revenue grew by 14.9% (+8.3% organically)outside France amounted to 18.3%.


We worked on strengthening our business portfolio by disposing of certain assets, resulting in no net external growth. We expanded in Spain, but sold the nuclear industry construction business of our specialized French subsidiaries. We also sold our German facilities management business.

Transportation


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenuerevenues within the transportation division:division in 2006 and 2007:


2005(in € millions)

2004(in € millions)

% change 2005/2004

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

4,349.7

3,588.7

+21.2%

+12.5%

+7.9%

+0.8%

2007

(in € millions)

2006

(in € millions)

% change 2007/2006

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

5,590.1

4,951.5

12.9%

8.1%

5.9%

(1.1)%


Our transportation division generatedRevenue in France rose by 9.8% (4.3% at constant scope), driven by the development of business in the Paris region (Île-de-France), and in urban (Bordeaux, Nice and Toulon) and intercity networks, and the impact of the full-year contribution from SNCM.

Outside France, revenue of €4.3 billion in 2005, a 21.2% increase compared with 2004. Organic growth was 12.5%, which is primarily attributable to the following:


·

In France, passenger transportation revenues increased strongly by 17.2%, due in particular to14.9% (10.4% at constant scope and exchange rates) reflecting the full impact of urban transit contracts renewedbusiness development in 2004North America (impact from the full-year contribution from Supershuttle and a good level of business activity), the growth in business activity in Australia as well as the impact of the contract in Toulouse, which was awarded for 2005.


·

Outside France, passenger transportation revenues grew by 23.6%, due in particular to the full impact of the Melbourne contract and new operations in the United States (Denver, Metrolink contract) and Europe (Dublin tramway, Helsinki bus contract).


Separately, the freight transportation business recorded growth in revenues of 26.8%, amounting to €151.7 million in 2005.


External growth (+7.9%) was due in particular to the acquisition of ATC in the United States in September 2005.


Europe.

Revenue by geographical region


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenue by geographical region:


(in € millions, except %)

2005

2004

% change 2005/2004

  

(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

% Change 2007/2006

% Change 2007/2006 (constant exchange rates)

France

12,253.7

11,476.4

+6.8%

14,255.9

13,403.0

6.4%

6.4%

United Kingdom

1,541.2

1,401.7

+10.0%

2,945.7

2,186.8

34.7%

35.5%,

Germany

1,794.7

1,332.8

+34.7%

2,702.9

1,992.9

35.6%

35.6%

Other European countries

4,908.1

4,310.0

+13.9%

6,033.3

5,317.9

13.5%

12.4%

United States

2,156.5

1,882.6

+14.5%

2,580.4

2,650.3

(2.6)%

6.3%

Oceania

878.6

644.0

+36.4%

1,308.2

931.4

40.5%

38.1%

Asia

573.1

483.9

+18.4%

961.0

770.9

24.7%

30.8%

Rest of the world

1,139.0

968.9

+17.6%

Total revenue

25,244.9

22,500.3

+12.2%

Rest of the world (including the Middle East)

1,840.8

1,367.2

34.6%

37.3%

Revenue

32,628.2

28,620.4

14.0%

14.9%



France


TheRevenue growth in France totaled 6.4% in 2007, despite unfavorable weather conditions, which negatively affected Water activities in the third quarter and Energy Services at the beginning of the year. Conversely, Veolia Eau benefited from continued vigorous growth in engineering and construction work and Veolia Energie from new industrial and municipal contracts. Veolia Propreté’s growth was linked to increased production levels at the new incineration plants and an increase in revenue in France was driven primarily by an increase at our transportation division, which recorded strong growthsolid and toxic waste tonnage collected and treated under high value-added service contracts. In addition to the full year impact of 15.4% at constant scope. This increase was in turn primarily related tothe consolidation of SNCM, Veolia Transport benefited from sustained activity growth in intercity transit systems and in the urban transportation business, where revenue strongly increased by 34.1% at constant scope in 2005.


greater Paris region.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 3876



Back to contentsContents


United Kingdom


The increaseRevenue grew by 35.5% in revenue2007 on a constant exchange rate basis. This growth was attributable to the acquisition of Cleanaway UK (full year impact compared to one quarter in 2006) in the United Kingdom was due in particular to growth in our waterenvironmental services division, which benefited fromcommercial development and small acquisitions by Veolia Energie, and the impactacquisition of a five-year contract extension, as well as growth in our waste management division, which recorded higher revenues from integrated service contracts.the non-regulated activities of Thames Water by Veolia Eau (one month contribution).


Germany


TheRevenue growth in Germany totaled 35.6% in 2007 and was primarily attributable to the acquisition of the Sulo Group by Veolia Propreté, an increase in revenue in Germany was mostly due to the integration ofsales under the Braunschweig water contract which generated revenue(Veolia Eau), the impact of €349.6 millionacquisitions in 2005.2006 and the organic growth of railway activities (Veolia Transport).


Other European countries


The contributionRevenue growth of 13.5% in 2007 (12.4% on a constant exchange rate basis) was mainly due to revenues fromthe expansion of Veolia Energie in Southern Europe, the acquisition of TMT in Italy by Veolia Propreté (3 months of revenue contribution) and the growth in Veolia Eau and Veolia Energie activities in Central and Eastern Europe rose significantly, in particular in our water division in the Czech Republic and in our energy services division in Poland, where we acquired the company that holds the Lodz contract. In addition, the Poznan contract contributed for the full year in 2005.Europe.


United States


Revenue growth of 6.3% at constant exchange rates in 2007 was particularly strong across all Veolia Propreté activities and in Veolia Transport, where the full effect of recent contract wins and acquisitions was felt. The acquisition of Thermal North America Inc by Veolia Energie did not contribute to 2007 revenue.

Apart from favorable currency fluctuations,

Oceania

40.5% revenue growth in Oceania in 2007 (38.1% at constant exchange rates) was driven by Veolia Eau contracts in Australia (Gold Coast and desalination plant in Sydney), the acquisition of TDU in Australia by Veolia Energie and the increase in contract revenue inunder the United States was primarily due to an increase in revenues recorded in our waste management division and our transportation division.  Revenue in our waste management division increased at year-end in particular, while revenue in our transportation division increased due to the acquisition of ATC, which generated €74.8 million in revenue over four months in 2005.


Oceania


Apart from favorable currency fluctuations of €34.5 million, the increase in revenue was due mainly to increased contributions from our transportation division and waste management division in Australia. The transportation division benefited from the full impact of theVeolia Transport Melbourne and Auckland contracts, while the waste management division recorded strong growth in industrial services and landfilling.contract.


Asia


The increase in revenueGrowth of 24.7% in Asia was due primarilymainly driven by Veolia Eau and attributable to growthrecent developments (contracts in our water division, which recorded organic growth of 9.9%. The Shenzhen contract went into production, generating €35 millionChina and acquisitions in revenue in 2005,Japan), by Veolia Propreté and operations commenced under several other Chinese contracts signed in 2003 and 2004. In South Korea, revenue declined by €23 million due to completion of construction of installations relating to the Incheon contract, which was only partially offset by the €10 million increase generated byVeolia Energie with the start-up of the Mansu and Songdo plants.new contracts.


Rest of the world


ThereRevenue growth of 34.6% was a favorable currency effectmarked by the steady growth of Veolia Eau activities in South America of €18.1 million. This principally affected Proactiva, which manages waterNorth Africa and waste managementnew contracts won by this Division in the region. In Israel, our energy services division acquired Kalorit Israel, which generated €14.7 million in revenue from ordinary activities in 2005.Middle East.


Operating Income


Overview


OurThe Group’s operating income increased by 27.8%17.1%, from €1,480.6€2,132.9 million in 20042006 to €1,892.9€2,496.9 million in 2005.2007.  Adjusted operating income increased by 11.1%, from €2,222.2 million in 2006 to €2,469.2 million in 2007.  The following table shows a breakdown of ouroperating income and adjusted operating income by division:division in 2006 and 2007:

 

Operating income

Adjusted operating income

 

2007

2006

%

change

2007

2006

%

change

Water

1,267.7

1,160.6

9.2%

1,265.7

1,163.4

8.8%

Environmental Services

803.5

648.3

23.9%

803.5

648.3

23.9%

Energy Services

398.7

377.7

5.6%

388.2

377.7

2.8%

Transportation

130.3

13.6

858.1%

115.1

100.1

15.0%

Unallocated

(103.3)

(67.3)

-

(103.3)

(67.3)

-

Total

2,496.9

2,132.9

17.1%

2,469.2

2,222.2

11.1%

Total at 2006 exchange rates

2,513.9

2,132.9

17.9%

2,486.2

2,222.2

11.9%




77


(in € millions, except %)

2005

2004

% change2005/2004

Water

1,007.3

799.5

+26.0%

Waste Management

530.5

467.5

+13.5%

Energy Services

326.1

250.3

+30.3%

Transportation

114.1

31.4

+263.3%

Holding companies

-85.1

-68.1

-25.0%

Total

1,892.9

1,480.6

+27.8%

Total at constant 2004 exchange rate

1,867.6

1,480.6

+26.1%


Back to Contents


As discussed above under “Presentation of Information in this Section – Non-GAAP Measures,” we use adjusted operating income, in addition to operating income, to evaluate the Group’s results of operations and otherwise as a management tool.  The following table shows a reconciliation of the Group’s operating income and adjusted operating income by division in 2006 and 2007:


2007

Total Operating Income

Adjustments

Adjusted Operating Income

(€ million)

Impairment

Other

Water

1,267.7

(2.0)

 

1,265.7

Environmental Services

803.5

-

-

803.5

Energy Services

398.7

(10.5)

 

388.2

Transportation

130.3

(5.7)

(9.5)(1)

115.1

Unallocated

(103.3)

-

-

(103.3)

Total

2,496.9

(18.2)

(9.5)

2,469.2


(1)

Represents primarily operating income resulting from the completion of our purchase of our interest in SNCM, as discussed under “ — Transportation” below.



2006

Total Operating Income

Adjustments

Adjusted Operating Income

(€ million)

Impairment

Other

Water

1,160.6

2.8

-

1,163.4

Environmental Services

648.3

-

-

648.3

Energy Services

377.7

-

-

377.7

Transportation

13.6

86.5

-

100.1

Unallocated

(67.3)

-

-

(67.3)

Total

2,132.9

89.3

-

2,222.2


Operating income increased 17.1% year-on-year, or by 17.9% at constant exchange rates. Adjusted operating income grew by 11.1%, or by 11.9% at constant exchange rates.  The increases mainly reflect growth in our revenues and overall business resulting from the factors described above in the discussion or our revenue growth, offset in part by an increase in unallocated operating losses, as described below.  Operating income growth also benefited from a significant decrease in impairment charges, which are excluded from the calculation of adjusted operating income.  As noted above, we recorded significant losses in our transportation division in Germany in 2006, primarily as a result of impairment charges, as discussed in more detail below.  We also recorded €106.6 million of capital gains from asset disposals in 2007, compared to €50.9 million in 2006.  Our capital gains in each year reflect ed primarily the sale of minority interests in our consolidated subsidiaries, discussed in more detail below.


Operating income in 2007 represented 7.7% of revenues compared to 7.5% in 2006.  Adjusted operating income represented 7.6% of revenues in 2007 compared to 7.8% in 2006.  The decline in overall operating income margin (adjusted operating income as a percentage of revenues) reflected primarily the rapid growth of engineering business in the water division, as well as services activities in the energy services division, which in both cases carry lower margins than some of our other activities.  General and administrative expenses decreased as a percentage of revenues (9.1% in 2006 and 8.4% in 2007), reflecting our continuing efforts to improve efficiency.    

Water


The water division reported a 9.2% increase in operating income, of our water division amounted to €1,007.3from €1,160.6 million in 2005, a 26.0% increase from the €799.52006 to €1,267.7 million recorded in 2004. In 2004,2007. Adjusted operating income was negatively affectedincreased by a €55.2 million loss relating to the sale of Berlikomm.8.8% in 2007 or by 9.3% at constant exchange rates.

In France, productivity efforts, the program to improve operating performance continued to be implemented,development of new services and the distribution andcontinued good level of construction businesses performed well, boosting operating income.activities offset the impact of a decline in volumes delivered.



78



Back to Contents


In Europe, Asia and the rest of Europe, the riseUnited States, growth in operating income was largely duebenefited from the start-up of new contracts and the positive effect of contracts reaching maturity. Growth in Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies business also contributed to the integrationincrease in adjusted operating income, despite a temporary delay in the delivery of the Braunschweig contract. In addition, contracts were renewedBrussels facility. Finally, Veolia Eau also benefited in 2007 from the definitive resolution of the dispute with the Land of Berlin concerning rainwater activities and a dilution capital gain resulting from the acquisition by the EBRD of a stake in Veolia Voda, the holding company for Central European activities.  

The operating margin (adjusted operating income/revenue) increased 0.1 point from 11.5% in 2006 to 11.6% in 2007, despite an increase in the United Kingdom, there were positive developmentscontribution of lower-margin engineering and construction activities. The ratio of operating income to revenues in the Czech Republic and Italy, and the BOT contractswater division also increased from 11.5% in Brussels and The Hague delivered their first positive contributions. In Asia-Pacific, operating income improved due2006 to the commencement of operations11.6% in China and South Korea. Finally, engineering and technology solutions took another step toward recovery after refocusing on profitable activities.


2007.

Waste ManagementEnvironmental Services


The Environmental Services division reported a 23.9% increase in operating income of our waste management division increased by 13.5%,(26.4% at constant exchange rates) from €467.5€648.3 million in 20042006 to €530.5€803.5 million in 2005.2007. Operating income was equal to adjusted operating income in both years.

InOperating performance in France benefited from the combined impact of an increase in volumes processed, in particular by incineration and landfill site activities, and the strong performance of toxic waste activities.

Outside France, the increase in operating income was particularly high in the U.K. market, following the consolidation of Cleanaway United Kingdom in the fourth quarter of 2006 and the good performance of integrated municipal waste management contracts in this country. In Germany, the consolidation of Sulo with effect from July 2, 2007 provided a significant contribution. In the United States, operating income increased substantially for high-growth industrial services and in the solid waste business thanks to price increases.

The operating margin (adjusted operating income / revenue) remained stable at 8.7% in 2006 and 2007.  Given that there were no adjustments in the environmental services division in 2006 and 2007, the ratio of operating income to revenues was equal to the ratio of adjusted operating income to revenues in each year.

Energy Services


The Energy Services Division reported a 5.6% increase in operating income from €377.7 million in 2006 to €398.7 million in 2007. Adjusted operating income rose 2.8% in 2007, or 1.8% at constant exchange rates.  The difference between operating income and adjusted operating income in 2007 reflected primarily the resultimpact of action plans initiatednegative goodwill recorded following employee share subscriptions at a division affiliate in previous years,Poland.

In France, profitability benefited from an improvement in particular with respect to waste collection and landfills. Inconstruction activities. Harsh weather conditions at the restend of the year helped partially offset the impact of the mild weather in the opening months of 2007.

In Europe, operating income increased primarily because integrated contracts posted strong growthsignificantly in Central Europe, thanks to an increase in electricity sales prices (Czech Republic and more generally, as a resultRomania) and the impact of strong performanceacquisitions (Hungary), partially offset by an increase in the waste collection businessprice of gas in the Baltic States. In Southern Europe, operating income benefited from commercial development in Italy.

Due to the impact of weather conditions, the reduction in the sales of CO² allowances and increased tonnage amountsthe development of lower margin service activities, the operating margin (adjusted operating income / revenue) fell from 6.2% in UK landfills. In2006 to 5.6% in 2007.  The ratio of operating income to revenues was 6.2% in 2006 and 5.8% in 2007, as the United States,2007 figure reflected the profitabilityimpact of toxic waste, industrial services and  solid waste activities increased.


the negative goodwill in Poland, described above.

Energy ServicesTransportation


The transportation division reported operating income of our energy services division increased by 30.3%, from €250.3€130.3 million in 20042007, compared to €326.1€13.6 million in 2005. In 2004,2006. Transportation division operating income was negatively affected by a €13.8in 2006 included impairment charges €86.5 million payment to settle a disputerecognized in Italy,Germany, while in 2005 non-recurring items totaled a2007 operating income reflected the impact of the finalization of the SNCM opening balance sheet (positive impact of €20.5 million, including the impact of negative €5.9 million, which were primarily related togoodwill and net provisions for contracts) and impairment losses on goodwill following our divestment of certain businesses. See Note 25 to our consolidated financial statements for further informationcharges relating to these impairment losses.


In France, the profitabilityEurolines activity (charge of thermal services in the areas of installation and services improved. Operating income was also enhanced by proceeds from the sale of greenhouse gas emission rights. Given the overall balanced nature of the contract portfolio, the rise in energy prices during 2005 had no net effect on profitability. Rising gas€6.9 million).  



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 3979



Back to contentsContents


prices have caused the selling prices of electricity produced through co-generation to reach their ceiling. Legislative changes at the end of 2005 limited this phenomenon, and the opportunity loss was offset by an upturn in energy management margins on other contracts. In the rest of Europe, the rise in operating income resulted directly from new contracts in Central Europe (Lodz and Poznan). This region was only marginally exposed to the rise in fuel prices in 2005, given the energy sources used. Finally, measures to improve energy efficiency were successful in the various regions where this division operates.


Transportation


The operating income of our transportation division increased substantially, from €31.4 million in 2004 to €114.1 million in 2005. Excluding impairment losses on Scandinavian goodwill in 2004,Adjusted operating income increased 15% from €100.1 million in 2006 to €115.1 million in 2007.  In addition, a dilution gain of €18.7 million was realized in 2006 following the acquisition by 12.5% (+11.0% at constant exchange rates). This result was achieved despite the negative impactEBRD of the risea stake in fuel prices, which totaled €17 million outside France. Price increases outside of France could not be fully passed on to the customer.


Central European companies.

In France, operating income increasedthe profitability of the passenger transport business improved, particularly intercity activities and activities in both the urbangreater Paris region, and inter-city transportation segments. Outside France, the Scandinavian business posted recoverydivision also recorded improvements resulting from the consolidation of SNCM.

International activities were boosted by solid performances in lineBelgium and Australia, by the full-year impact of acquisitions in North America (in particular ATC and Shuttleport) and by the turnaround of activities in Germany. However the start-up of the Limburg and Brabant contracts had a negative impact on the results for the year.

Following a review of division assets with a profit improvement plan. In other regions, operatingview to improving profitability, Veolia Transport sold its activities in Denmark and Spain. The results of the Danish activities are recorded as income and expense from discontinued operations, while the results of the Spanish activities were recorded in the transportation division, benefitedas they did not constitute a major line of business or geographical area unit under IFRS.

Operating margin (adjusted operating income / revenue) improved from new contracts2.0% in 2006 to 2.1% in 2007.  The ratio of operating income to revenue, impacted in both years by the adjustment items referred to above, was 0.3% in 2006 and 2.3% in 2007.

Unallocated Operating Income (loss)

Unallocated operating income (loss) represents primarily items recorded at the holding company level. Our unallocated operating loss increased from €67.3 million in accordance with  business plans.


2006 to €103.3 million in 2007, primarily as a result in share based compensation expenses and charges relating to employee savings plans recorded under IFRS 2, as well as an increase in research and development expenditures and the centralization of civil liability insurance costs (which correspondingly reduced insurance costs at the division level).    

Finance Costs, Netcosts, net


Finance costs, net represent the cost of gross financial fair value debt, including profit and loss on related interest rate and exchange rate hedging, less income on cash and cash equivalents. The following table shows a breakdown of ourthe Group’s finance costs, net:


(in € millions)

2007

2006

   

Income

152.5

82.8

Expense

(969.6)

(783.8)

Finance costs, net

(817.1)

(701.0)


(in € millions)

2005

2004

   

Income

68.3

97.0

Expense

-781.7

-829.1

Total

-713.4

-732.1

The increase in net finance costs reflects:

the increase in average net financial debt from €14,001 million for 2006 to €14,609 million for 2007, as a result of the investment and growth policy,

the increase in floating rates due to tension in the European, U.S. and U.K. interbank markets starting in the summer of 2007,

the increase in the average maturity of debt following long-maturity issues (euro issue maturing 2022 and sterling issue maturing 2037).


The financing rate was 5.12% in 2005, compared to 5.04% in 2004. This slight increase in(defined as the financing rate mainly reflects the appreciationratio of several currencies against the euro and in particular the U.S. dollar, and the cost of extending the maturity of borrowings. In addition, net finance costs, in 2005 include €26.0 million related to our partial early redemption (in the amount of €1,150 million) of bonds due to mature in June 2008. This early redemption was conducted in order to optimize the maturity and future cost of borrowings. In addition,excluding fair value movementsadjustments on derivativefinancial instruments not qualifying for hedge accounting, totaled +€12.0to average quarterly net financial debt) increased from 5.07% in 2006 to 5.49% in 2007.



80



Back to Contents


Fair value adjustments on financial instruments not qualifying for hedge accounting represented losses of €15.4 million in 2007, compared to +€7.6gains of €6.4 million in 2004.2006. These movements,adjustments, which are calculated in accordance with IAS 39 and depend on market conditions at the balance sheet date, are highly volatile in nature.


volatile.

Other Financial Income (Expenses)


The following table shows a breakdown of our other financial income (expenses):

  

(in € millions)

2005

2004

Loan income

37.0

55.4

Dividends

6.5

5.9

Foreign exchange gains (losses)

14.3

-13.9

Financial provisions

24.2

-

Other income (expenses)

-51.5

-1.3

Total

30.5

46.1

(€ million)

2007

2006

Net gains on loans and receivables

56.8

21.5

Net gains and losses on available-for-sale assets (including dividends)

10.3

9.7

Assets and liabilities at fair value through the Income Statement

5.5

(21.6)

Unwinding of the discount on provisions

(60.8)

(15.9)

Foreign exchange gains and losses

(2.8)

(14.3)

Other income (expenses)

(7.6)

(13.4)

Other financial income and expenses

1.4

(34.0)


We recorded

Other financial income and expenses improved from a net expense of €34.0 million in 2006 to a net income of €1.4 million in 2007. This improvement in the contribution of other financial income of €30.5 million in 2005, compared to €46.1 million in 2004.  In 2004, other financial income included a capital gain realized on the sale of Vinci shares of €44.4 million. Excluding this capital gain, other financial income (expenses) increased by €28.8 million in 2004,and expenses was mainly due to foreign exchange gains.to:


In 2005:


·

loan income and dividends fell to €43.5 million;

·

foreign exchange gains totaled €14.3 million;

·

the reverse discounting of site restoration provisions had an impact of -€15.7 million; and

·

the revaluation of embedded derivatives had an impact of -€2.5 million.


In 2004, other financial income (expenses) was affected by a capital gain of €44.4 million realized onreduction in the sale of Vinci shares by the energy services division, foreign exchange losses of €13.9€11.5 million,

the revaluationimpact of the fair value measurement of embedded derivatives (-€12.9 million), loanfor €26.9 million (other income (expenses)); the fair value measurement of derivatives embedded in contracts and dividendsin particular certain industrial contracts in South Korea had a positive impact of €61.3€10.6 million in 2007, compared to a negative impact of €16.3 million in 2006, and

the increase in net gains on loans and receivables of €34.6 million (including interest income on the reverse discountingBerlin Lander rainwater receivable of site restoration provisions (-€10.8€26.5 million).


These improvements were partially offset by an increase in the charge in respect of the unwinding of the discount on provisions of €44.9 million. In 2007, the increase in this charge on long-term provisions related to SNCM (provisions for onerous contracts), pension obligations and provisions for closure and post-closure costs for waste storage facilities in the environmental services division.

Income Tax Expense


OurThe consolidated income tax expense of the Group for 2007 was €420.1 million (current tax expense of €416.3 million and deferred tax expense of €3.8 million), compared to €409.6 million for 2006 (current tax expense of €330.9 million and deferred tax expense of  €78.7 million). The increase in the income tax expense in 2007 was due to:

an increase in the scope of consolidation of the Group and pre-tax income, increasing both the current and deferred tax expense;

a reduction in tax rates in a sizeable number of countries with a total positive impact of €62.0 million relating to deferred tax liability balances (including a positive impact of €54.6 million in Germany and the United Kingdom); and

an improvement in the outlook for the use of ordinary tax losses of the U.S. tax group, generating an additional deferred tax credit of €85 million, resulting primarily from the integration of Thermal North America Inc., as well as to an improved outlook for environmental services activities.

In 2006 we recorded a deferred tax credit of €86.2 million relating to the restructuring of our U.S. tax group.  This tax credit and the 2007 tax credit referred to above result from tax losses relating to the activities of our former subsidiary U.S. Filter, and are currently being reviewed by the U.S. tax authorities at our request.  See Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements for additional details.



81



Back to Contents


Excluding the U.S. tax credits in 2006 and a tax benefit relating to an SNCM tax election in 2007, our income tax expense decreased from €495.8 in 2006 million to €431.1 million in 2007.  

Our effective income tax rate decreased from 29.3% in 2006 to 25.0% in 2007, primarily as a result of the tax rate reductions and recognition of additional deferred tax assets related to United States tax losses, as described above.

Share of Net Income of Associates


The share of net income of associates increased from €6.0 million in 2006 to €16.9 million in 2007. The increase in the net income of associates is mainly due to improvement in the results of Veolia Propreté associates in Taiwan and the inclusion of the associates of the Sulo sub-group (Veolia Propreté, Germany).

Net Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations


The net loss from discontinued operations was €23.2 million in 2007 (including impairment losses of €21.3 million in respect of the Transportation business in Denmark), compared to net income of €0.6 million in 2006 (which reflected income from Southern Water and losses, including impairment charges, from the Danish transportation business, as discussed in more detail below).


Net income for the year attributable to minority interests


Net income for the year attributable to minority interests was €326.9 million for 2007, compared to €236.2 million for 2006. This line item reflects minority interests in water division subsidiaries (€178.9 million in 2007), environmental services division subsidiaries (€21.8 million), energy division subsidiaries (€96.4 million) and transportation division subsidiaries (€28.9 million). The increase between 2006 and 2007 mainly concerns the water division in Germany, following the positive outcome to the dispute with the Berlin Lander, and the transportation division, as a result of the consolidation of SNCM for a full year.

In 2006, net income for the year attributable to minority interests totaled €422.9€236.2 million and mainly concerned minority interests in water division subsidiaries (€115.7 million), environmental services division subsidiaries (€18.6 million), energy division subsidiaries (€87.1 million) and transportation division subsidiaries (€14.7 million).

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent


Net income for the year attributable to equity holders of the parent was €927.9 million in 2007, compared to €758.7 million in 2006.  Adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent was €933.2 million in 2007, compared to €762.0 million in 2006.

Adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent for the year ended December 31, 2007 is determined as follows:

Fiscal year 2007

(€ million)

Net Income

Adjustments

Adjusted Net Income

Operating income

2,496.9

(27.7)

2,469.2

Net finance costs

(817.1)

-

(817.1)

Other financial income and expenses

1.4

4.6

6.0

Income tax expense

(420.1)

(11.0)(1)

(431.1)

Share of net income of associates

16.9

-

16.9

Net loss from discontinued operations

(23.2)

23.2

-

Minority interests

(326.9)

16.2

(310.7)

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent

927.9

5.3

933.2

    

(1)

Represents the impact of a change in tax status relating to SNCM.

   




82



Back to Contents


Adjusted net income for the year ended December 31, 2006 is determined as follows:

Fiscal year 2006

(€ million)

Net Income

Adjustments

Adjusted Net Income

Operating income

2,132.9

89.3

2,222.2

Net finance costs

(701.0)

-

(701.0)

Other financial income and expenses

(34.0

-

(34.0)

Income tax expense

(409.6)

(86.2)

(495.8)

Share of net income of associates

6.0

-

6.0

Net income from discontinued operations

0.6

(0.6)

-

Minority interests

(236.2)

(0.8)

(235.4)

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent

758.7

(3.3)

762.0


Given the weighted average number of shares outstanding of 430.0 million in 2007 and 398.8 million in 2006 (adjusted for the share capital increase in July 2007), earnings per share attributable to equity holders of the parent was €2.16 in 2007, compared to €1.90 in 2006 (adjusted for the share capital increase in July 2007).  Adjusted net income per share was €2.17 in 2007, compared to €1.91 in 2006 (adjusted for the share capital increase in July 2007).


Year ended December 31, 2006 compared to year ended December 31, 2005

Revenue

Overview

Our consolidated revenue for the year ending December 31, 2006 grew 11.9% to €28,620.4 million, compared to €25,570.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. Organic growth was 8.1% in 2006.

External growth of 3.8% was primarily the result of acquisitions made by Veolia Transport in France and the United States (a combined contribution of approximately €443 million) and Veolia Propreté in the United Kingdom (a contribution of approximately €215 million). Revenue from outside France in 2006 was €15,217.4 million, or 53.2% of the total, compared with 51.3% in 2005.

The currency effect was neutral, with a weakening of the U.S. dollar (negative impact of €53.5 million) offset by a strengthening of the Czech koruna (positive impact of €44.7 million).

The following table shows a breakdown of our revenue in 2005 and 2006:

2006

(in € millions)

2005

(in € millions)

% change 2006/2005

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

28,620.4

25,570.4

11.9%

8.1%

3.8%

-


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenue by division in 2005 and 2006:


(in € millions, except for %)

2006

2005

% change 2006/2005

    

Water

10,087.6

9,134.2

10.4%

Environmental Services

7,462.9

6,748.7

10.6%

Energy Services

6,118.4

5,463.6

12.0%

Transportation

4,951.5

4,223.9

17.2%

Total revenue

28,620.4

25,570.4

11.9%

Total revenue at constant 2005 exchange rate

28,631.0

25,570.4

11.9%



83



Back to Contents


Water


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenues within the water division in 2005 and 2006:


2006

(in € millions)

2005

(in € millions)

% change 2006/2005

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

10,087.6

9,134.2

10.4%

9.1%

1.2%

0.1%


In France, organic revenue growth was 3.6% in 2006, excluding Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies, due to a good performance of the distribution businesses as well as further growth in the water network building and renovation business.

Outside France, excluding Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies and Proactiva, revenue grew 13.6% in 2006 (11.8% at constant scope and exchange rates).  In Europe, revenue growth of 11.4% was driven by the start-up of new contracts, in particular in Germany (the Braunschweig municipal contract), in the Czech Republic (Hradec Kralove and Prostejov) and in Slovakia (Poprad and Banska Bystrica). In the Asia-Pacific region, strong revenue growth of 36.2% (of which 26.9% was organic growth) was mainly driven by new contracts signed in China (Hohhot, Changzhou, Kunming and Urumqui in the municipal sector). External growth in this region was the result of Veolia Water’s increased stake in the Adelaide contract in Australia and small acquisitions in Japan. We continued our expansion in Africa and the Middle East where growth exceeded 12%. In North America, revenue grew 4.6% in 2006, or 6.7% based on a constant scope and exchange rate.  

Veolia Water Solutions and Technologies posted revenue growth of 17.8% at constant scope and exchange rates, driven in particular by a sharp upturn in the engineering and construction businesses in France, the Middle East and the United States.  Including acquisitions made during the year, revenue growth totaled 21.8%.

Environmental Services


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenues within the Environmental Services (waste management) division in 2005 and 2006:


2006

(in € millions)

2005

(in € millions)

% change 2006/2005

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

7,462.9

6,748.7

10.6%

7.6%

3.5%

(0.5)%


In the Environmental Services (waste management) business, revenue in France grew 4.1% (of which 3.7% was organic growth), driven by the combined effect of the growing contribution of new incineration plants and the increased tonnages of solid waste collected and treated under high value added service contracts.

Outside France, excluding Proactiva, organic growth was 10.8%. It was particularly strong in the United States in all business lines (13.2% at constant exchange rates, or 11.0% at current exchange rates). In the United Kingdom, overall growth totaled 34.2% (of which 6.9% was organic growth), driven by the acquisition of Cleanaway UK, completed on September 28, 2006 and by the general development of the business within a growing market. In Asia, the start-up of the Foshan and Guanghzou-Likeng contracts made a significant contribution to revenue growth of 14%.

Energy Services


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenues within the energy services division in 2005 and 2006:


2006

(in € millions)

2005

(in € millions)

% change 2006/2005

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

6,118.4

5,463.6

12.0%

10.0%

1.5%

0.5%




84



Back to Contents


Our Energy Services division generated revenue of €6.1 billion in 2006, an increase of 12% over 2005, of which 10% was organic growth. The full-year impact of the rise in energy prices was €260 million, of which €226 million was realized during the first nine months of 2006.  The fourth quarter represented a new heating season, during which prices stabilized or declined compared to the first three quarters, although our Energy Services business continued to grow during this period.  Excluding the full year price effect, organic revenue growth was 7.2%.

The business was subject to contrasting weather conditions over the course of 2006.  While the beginning of the year had experienced more harsh temperatures than the average, the end of the year, on the contrary, was warmer than the seasonal standards.

InFrance, organic growth of 8.2% resulted primarily from the increase in energy prices in the first quarter of the year, the start-up of new contracts and an upturn in the engineering business.

Outside France, revenue growth totaled 17.0% of which12.6% was organic growth. It was primarily driven by the full effect of the Lodz contract (Poland), favorable pricing in Central Europe as well as acquisitions in Italy and Brazil.

Transportation


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenues within the transportation division in 2005 and 2006:


2006

(in € millions)

2005

(in € millions)

% change 2006/2005

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

4,951.5

4,223.9

17.2%

4.7%

12.9%

(0.4)%


InFrance,revenue growth was 12.7%, driven by the contribution of SNCM (2006 revenue contribution of approximately €200 million). The end of the Toulouse contract was offset by the positive impact of new contracts in the field of urban and intercity transit systems, and by the good performance of other business lines.

Outside France, revenue advanced by 20.4% of which 7.6% was organic growth. External growth was mainly due to acquisitions made in the United States (ATC and Shuttleport) and in Norway (Helgelandske).

Revenue by geographical region


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenue by geographical region:


(€ millions, except %)

2006

2005

% change 2006/2005

France

13,403.0

12,439.2

7.7%

United Kingdom

2,186.8

1,727.1

26.6%

Germany

1,992.9

1,817.3

9.7%

Other European countries

5,317.9

4,708.6

12.9%

United States

2,650.3

2,183.3

21.4%

Oceania

931.4

878.0

6.1%

Asia

770.9

597.3

29.1%

Rest of the world

1,367.2

1,219.6

12.1%

Revenue

28,620.4

25,570.4

11.9%




85



Back to Contents


France

In France revenue growth of 7.7% in 2006 was driven by Veolia Energie as a result of rising energy prices (an impact of 5.5% in the revenues of Veolia Energie France), by Veolia Eau as a result of continued strong growth in the engineering and construction sectors as well as continued solid results of the distribution business, by Veolia Propreté due to the combined effect of the increased efficiency of incineration plants and the increase in tonnage of solid waste collected and treated under high value-added service contracts and by the acquisition of SNCM by Veolia Transport.

United Kingdom

The strong growth of 26.6% in the United Kingdom in 2006 resulted from the acquisition of Cleanaway UK (three month effect), the full impact of the acquisition of Shanks in 2005 by the Environmental Services division, Veolia Énergie due to commercial development and an increase in energy prices, and the impact of five-year tariff reviews at Veolia Eau in 2005.

Germany

Growth in Germany was 9.7% in 2006, largely due to new contracts, particularly the contract between Braunschweig and Veolia Eau for a wastewater plant and rail transport contracts (Nordharz-Netz and Marschbahn).  

Other European countries

The 12.9% growth in revenues in 2006 was due to full-year effect of the Lodz contract in Poland and to the impact of prices in the Energy Division, as well as new contracts and small acquisitions in our other sectors.

United States

Growth in the United States, 21.4% overall in 2006, was particularly significant in Veolia Propreté’s business and in Veolia Transport due to the impact of recent developments, including the acquisitions of ATC and Shuttleport, and the signing of new contracts.  

Oceania

Growth of 6.1% in the Oceania region in 2006 was due to the signing of new contracts in 2005 within Veolia Propreté and sustained activity within Veolia Transport.

Asia

Growth in Asia was 29.1% in 2006, which was due to recent developments in Veolia Eau (contracts in China and acquisitions in Japan) and to the start of new contracts for Veolia Propreté.

Rest of the world

Growth in the rest of the world was 12.1% in 2006, marked by the continued growth of Veolia Eau in North Africa and the Middle East.

Operating Income


Overview


Our operating income increased by 12.7%, from €1,892.9 million in 2005 to €2,132.9 million in 2006. The following table shows a breakdown of our operating income by division:

(in € millions, except %)

2006

2005

% change

Water

1,160.6

1,002.3

15.8%

Environmental Services

648.3

543.6

19.3%

Energy Services

377.7

315.3

19.8%

Transportation

13.6

116.8

(88.3)%

Holding companies

(67.3)

(85.1)

20.9%

Total

2,132.9

1,892.9

12.7%

Total at constant 2005 exchange rate

2,126.8

1,892.9

12.4%



86



Back to Contents


As discussed above under “Presentation of Information in this Section – Non-GAAP Measures,” we use adjusted operating income, in addition to operating income, to evaluate our results of operations and otherwise as a management tool.  The following table shows a breakdown of our adjusted operating income by division:

(in € millions, except %)

2006

2005

% change

Water

1,163.4

997.1

16.7%

Environmental Services

648.3

553.6

17.1%

Energy Services

377.7

321.2

17.6%

Transportation

100.1

116.8

(14.3)%

Holding companies

(67.3)

(85.1)

20.9%

Total

2,222.2

1,903.6

16.7%

Total at constant 2005 exchange rate

2,216.1

1,903.6

16.4%



The following tables provide a reconciliation of adjusted operating income to operating income for 2005 and 2006:

2006

Total Operating Income

Adjustments

Adjusted

Operating Income

(€ millions)

 Impairment

Other

Water

1,160.6

2.8

-

1,163.4

Environmental Services

648.3

-

-

648.3

Energy Services

377.7

-

-

377.7

Transportation

13.6

86.5

-

100.1

Holding companies

(67.3)

-

-

(67.3)

Total

2,132.9

89.3

-

2,222.2



2005

Total operating income

Adjustments

Adjusted operating income

(€ millions)

 Impairment

Other

Water

1,002.3

(5.2)

-

997.1

Environmental Services

543.6

10.0

-

553.6

Energy Services

315.3

4.7

1.2

321.2

Transportation

116.8

-

-

116.8

Holding companies

(85.1)

-

-

(85.1)

Total

1,892.9

9.5

1.2

1,903.6


Operating income grew by 12.7% in 2006 compared to €184.12005, or by 12.4% at constant exchange rates. Adjusted operating income grew by 16.7%, or by 16.4% at constant exchange rates.  The increases reflect primarily growth in our revenues and overall business and, in the case of adjusted operating income, an increase in margins resulting from the factors described in the division-by-division analysis below, as well as the continued benefits of our “Veolia Environnement 2005” efficiency plan, which resulted in selling, general and administrative expenses declining from 11.3% of revenues in 2005 to 10.9% of revenues in 2006.  Restructuring costs increased marginally in 2006 compared to 2005, while capital gains on asset sales decreased marginally.

Operating income in 2006 represented 7.5% of revenues compared to 7.4% in 2005.  Adjusted operating income represented 7.8% of revenues in 2006 and 7.4% in 2005.  In 2006, the only adjustments between operating income and adjusted operating income were impairment charges, primarily resulting from difficulties with a German contract in the Transport division (as discussed below).  In 2005, our impairment charges related to Environmental Services activities in Israel and Stérience in the Energy Services division.  We also recorded negative goodwill in the Water division.  



87



Back to Contents


Water


Operating income from the Water division totaled €1,160.6 million in 2004.  Our2006, a 15.8% increase from €1,002.3 million recorded in 2005. Adjusted operating income grew by 16.7%, or by 16.3% at constant exchange rates.

In France, the distribution and waterwork businesses performed well, boosting operating income, which also benefited from the continuing implementation of the program to improve operating performance.

Outside France, we recorded an increase in operating income that resulted from developments of the Stadtwerke in Braunschweig (including a positive adjustment to fair market value of an electricity supply contract), and from the beginning of new contracts in China and the impact of BOT contracts in Brussels and The Hague.  In addition, the effect of contractual price increases, including in the United Kingdom, Central Europe, Romania and Morocco, had a positive impact on operating income. Finally, engineering and technology solutions took another step toward recovery.

The ratio of adjusted operating income to revenue from ordinary activities increased by 0.6 points, from 10.9% in 2005 to 11.5% in 2006.  The ratio of operating income to revenue from ordinary activities increased from 11.0% in 2005 to 11.5% in 2006.

Environmental Services


Operating income from the Environmental Services division increased by 19.3%, from €543.6 million in 2005 to €648.3 million in 2006.

In France, operating income increased as a result of an increase in volume, primarily in the incineration sector and in the landfill business.

Outside France, we recorded an increase in operating income, which was especially strong in the UK market due to the integration of Cleanaway United Kingdom in the fourth quarter of 2006 and the strong performance of integrated waste management contracts.  In the United States, the operating margin noticeably increased in the industrial services that are experiencing strong growth and in the solid waste activities due to increased prices.

The ratio of adjusted operating income to revenue increased from 8.2% in 2005 to 8.7% in 2006.  The ratio of operating income to revenue from ordinary activities increased from 8.1% in 2005 to 8.7% in 2006.

Energy Services


Operating income from the Energy Services division increased by 19.8%, from €315.3 million in 2005 to €377.7 million in 2006. At constant exchange rates adjusted operating income grew by 16.2%.

In France, profitability benefited from improvements in construction activities (both the level of activity and better efficiency). Given the overall balanced nature of the contract portfolio, the rise in energy prices had only a slight effect on profitability. As in 2005, rising gas prices caused the selling prices of electricity produced through co-generation to reach their ceiling. This phenomenon had limited effect, and the opportunity loss was offset by an upturn in energy management margins on other contracts and by the sale of surplus greenhouse gas emission rights generated by activities.

In the rest of Europe, we recorded a strong rise in operating income in Central European countries that resulted in particular from prices and a favorable climate in the Czech Republic and Poland and from the commencement of new contracts, such as the Lodz contract. A decrease in profit margin recorded in various countries following the increase in gas prices was more than offset by the sale of surplus greenhouse gas emission rights generated by activities.  

Given these items, the ratio of adjusted operating income to revenue increased, from 5.9% in 2005 to 6.2% in 2006.   The ratio of operating income to revenue from ordinary activities increased from 5.8% in 2005 to 6.2% in 2006.



88



Back to Contents


Transportation


Operating income from the Transportation division was €13.6 million in 2006, compared to  €116.8 million in 2005. Due to persistent difficulties relating to a contract, Veolia Transport carried out a review of its activities in Germany and accounted for losses of €86.5 million, which were excluded from adjusted operating income.  Excluding this item, adjusted operating income decreased by 14.3% (14.5% at constant exchange rates) to €100.1 million.

In France, the profitability of the passengers transportation business improved, resulting mainly from interurban activities and services in Ile de France (the region that includes Paris), as well as the integration of SNCM.  

Outside France, solid performances were recorded in the Benelux countries and Australia.  Operating income was also affected by acquisitions in North America, particularly ATC and Shuttleport, and by a dilution profit of €18.7 million resulting from the EBRD’s acquisition of an interest in Central European activities.

Because of the negative impact of rising energy prices, the ratio of adjusted operating income to revenue decreased from 2.8% in 2005 to 2.0% in 2006.  The ratio of operating income to revenue from ordinary activities declined from 2.8% in 2005 to 0.3% in 2006.

Finance costs, net


Finance costs, net, decreased from €710.7 million in 2005 to €701.0 million in 2006.  Finance costs, net represent the cost of gross financial fair value debt, including profit and loss on related interest rate and exchange rate hedging, less income on cash and cash equivalents.  The following table shows a breakdown of our finance costs, net:


(€ millions)

2006

2005

   

Income

82.8

63.3

Expense

(783.8)

(774.0)

Total finance costs, net

(701.0)

(710.7)


The financing rate, defined as the ratio between the cost of net financial debt (equal to finance costs, net, excluding fair value adjustments to non-qualifying for hedge instruments) to average net indebtedness (based on a quarterly weighted average), was stable at 5.07% in both 2005 and 2006.

This stability, which was maintained despite an increase in short-term euro interest rates, was due to the increase in the portion of fixed rate debt in our indebtedness and the maturity of certain high interest rate debt.  The €26 million redemption premium paid in 2005 in connection with the redemption of €1,150 million of convertible bonds was not included in the 2005 financing rate, although the relatively low interest rate did affect the 2005 financing rate.

In addition, fair value adjustments on derivative instruments not qualifying for hedge accounting totaled €6.4 million, compared to €10.1 million in 2005. These adjustments, which are calculated in accordance with IAS 39 and which depend on market conditions at the end of the period, are highly volatile in nature.




89



Back to Contents


Other Financial Income and Expenses


The following table shows a breakdown of our other financial income (expenses), as adjusted to take into account the retroactive application of IFRS 7, which we applied for the first time in 2007:


(€ millions)

2006

2005

Net gains on loans and receivables

21.5

61.2

Net gains and losses on available-for-sale assets (including dividends)

9.7

6.5

Assets and liabilities at fair value through profit and loss

(21.6)

(6.1)

Unwinding of the discount on provisions

(15.9)

(17.3)

Foreign exchange gains and losses

(14.3)

14.3

Other income (expenses)

(13.4)

(30.5)

Other financial income and expenses

(34.0)

28.1


Other net financial income and expenses were positive €28.1 million in 2005 and negative €34.0 million in 2006.  The decline in other financial income and expenses principally resulted from the impact of the foreign exchange gains and losses (negative impact of €28.6 million), the revaluation of embedded derivatives negative impact of €13.8 million) and provisions of €8.4 million in 2006 linked to guarantees issued by the subsidiaries of Veolia Propreté in Asia.

In 2006, the unwinding of discounts of long term provisions had a negative impact of €15.9 million, compared with a negative impact of €17.3 million in 2005.  The revaluation of embedded derivatives had a negative impact of €16.3 million in 2006, compared with a negative impact of €2.5 million in 2005.


Income Tax Expense


Income tax expense consiststotaled €409.6 million in 2006, consisting of €309.4€330.9 million in current income taxes and €113.5€78.7 million in deferred income taxes, compared to €225.1a total expense of €422.4 million in 2005, consisting of €309.4 million in current income taxes and a deferred income tax benefit of €41.0 million in 2004.


€113.0 million.

The increasedecrease in income tax expense in 20052006 was primarily due to the restructuring of our U.S. tax group, which generated a deferred tax credit of €86.2 million (included in “Other countries” in the deferred tax expense in the notes to our consolidated financial statements).  Apart from this credit, an increase in operating income. In addition, in 2004our scope of consolidation and pre-tax income increased both the prospect of future profits prompted us to capitalize additional tax-loss carry forwards, limitingcurrent and deferred tax expense for that year.expense.  


We have classified the non-adjusted U.S. credit as an adjustment item in calculating our adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent, as discussed below.  Excluding this item, income tax expenses increased from €422.4 million to €495.8 million, and the effective tax rate was 33.34%.

Share of Net Income of Associates


OurThe share of net income of associates decreased from €24.2€6.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 to €6.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.  This near-stability reflects the first-time equity accounting of Compagnie Méridionale de Navigation (shares of which are held by the SNCM) whose results in 20042006 were €5.1 million, as well as provisions of €7.4 million relating to €14.9 million in 2005, following the transfer of certain investments in associates to non-consolidated investments. The largest net incomeproject company shares in 2005 were generated by water segment associates (€10.8 million).the Environmental Services sector in Asia, due to the client’s repudiation of the related agreements.


Net Income (expense)(Loss) from Discontinued Operations


Net income (expenses) from discontinued operations iswas €0.6 million for the totalyear ended December 31, 2006, compared with €0.7 million for 2005.  Income relating to Southern Water was €52.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 (including €51.2 million of income and expenses, net of tax, relatedcapital gains from the disposal), compared to businesses sold or in€8.4 million for 2005.  The loss relating to the process of being sold, in accordance with IFRS 5. It isDanish Transportation business was €51.9 million for the income or expense generated over the period by the assets and liabilities included in the specific, balance-sheet line items “Assets of discontinued operations” and “Liabilities of discontinued operations.”


In 2005, thereyear ended December 31, 2006 (of which €43.9 million was no income from discontinued operations. In 2004, discontinued operations generated a loss of €105.7 million. This loss broke down as follows: a €162.2an asset impairment charge), compared to €7.7 million loss from U.S. water businesses, a €58.4 million gain from FCC and a €1.9 million loss from UK transportation activities.for 2005.



Minority Interests


Our net income attributable to minority interests in 2005 was €179.0 million, compared to €137.5 million in 2004. The principal minority interests in 2005 are related to our water division (€86.7 million), our waste management division (€25.7 million), our energy services division (€57.0 million) and our transportation division (€9.9 million).



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 4090



Back to contentsContents


The increase in netNet income for the year attributable to minority interests in 2005 compared to 2004 is primarily attributable to our water division following the consolidation of the Braunschweig contract (+€9.8 million), and the improvement in the results of the Berlin water companies (+€31.7 million), the 2004 results of which were affected by the capital loss generated by the sale of Berlikomm.


Net income attributable to minority interests in 2004for the year ended December 31, 2006 was €137.5 million. The principal€236.2 million, compared to €172.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. This line item reflected minority interests in 2004 were related to our water divisionthe Water segment (€49.2 million, mainly related to Berlin water companies), our energy services division (€53.1115.7 million), our waste management divisionthe Environmental Services segment (€21.518.6 million), the Energy Services segment (€87.1 million) and our transportation divisionthe Transportation segment (€13.914.7 million). The increase between 2005 and 2006 is mainly attributable to developments in international activities of Dalkia in partnership with EDF, the Water segment in Germany (€19.3 million) and the Transportation segment with the consolidation of SNCM (€7.9 million).


Net income attributable to minority interests for the year ended December 31, 2005 was €172.9 million. This line item reflected minority interests in the Water segment (€83.1 million), the Environmental Services segment (€25.7 million), the Energy segment (€54.7 million) and the Transportation segment (€9.7 million).

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent


Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent was €623.0€758.7 million in 2005,2006, compared to €391.5€622.2 million in 2004. The increase was primarily due to the increase in operating income and control over financial interest expense during 2005.


The weighted average number of shares outstanding was 393.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 and 390.4 million onfor the year ended December 31, 2005 and 396.2 million on December 31, 2004.2005. On this basis, net earnings per share attributable to the equity holders was €1.60were €1.93 in 2006, compared to €1.59 in 2005 (in each case, without adjustment for our July 2007 capital increase).

As discussed under “—Presentation of Information in this Section – Non-GAAP Measures,” we use adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent as an important management tool.  Adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent was €762.0 million in 2006, compared to €0.99€630.2 million in 2004.2005.  The following table presents a reconciliation of adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent, to net income attributable to equity holders of the parent, for 2005 and 2006.

2006

(€ millions)

Net income

Adjustments

Adjusted
net income

Operating income

2,132.9

89.3

2,222.2

Finance costs, net

(701.0)

-

(701.0)

Other financial income and expenses

(34.0)

-

(34.0)

Income tax expense

(409.6)

(86.2)

(495.8)

Share of net income of associates

6.0

-

6.0

Net income from discontinued operations

0.6

(0.6)

-

Minority interests

(236.2)

0.8

(235.4)

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent

758.7

3.3

762.0



2005 adjusted

(€ millions)

Net income

Adjustments

Adjusted net income

Operating income

1,892.9

10.7

1,903.6

Finance costs, net

(710.7)

-

(710.7)

Other financial income and expenses

28.1

-

28.1

Income tax expense

(422.4)

-

(422.4)

Share of net income of associates

6.5

-

6.5

Net income from discontinued operations

0.7

(0.7)

-

Minority interests

(172.9)

(2.0)

(174.9)

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent

622.2

8.0

630.2


In 2006, the principal adjustment item (other than the adjustment to operating income, which is discussed above) was the non-adjusted deferred tax credit relating to the tax restructuring of our U.S. operations, which is discussed above.  In 2005, the only significant adjustment item was the adjustment to operating income, which is discussed above.




91



Back to Contents


LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our operations generate significant cash flow.  In 2007, our operating cash flow before changes in working capital was more than sufficient to cover our investment requirements.  We also have access to sources of liquidity that include bank financing, international bond markets and international equity markets.  We believe that our working capital is sufficient for our present requirements.

Cash Flows

Operating cash flow before changes in working capital or operating cash flow, increased by 6.6%9.8%, from €3,460.6€3,844.4 million in 20042006 to €3,687.3€4,219.4 million in 2005.2007. Excluding the cash flowflows of discontinued operations (negative €8.0 million in 2004 (€232.8 million)2006 and negative €1.5 million in 2007), operating cash flow before changes in working capital increased by 14.2%,9.6% in 2007, reflecting our improved operating performance.performance and growth. The definition of operating cash flow before changes in working capital recommended by theConseil national de la comptabilité CNC (French National Accounting Council)Institute) excludes the impact of financing activities and taxation.

Net cash flow from operating activities decreasedincreased from €3,517.0€3,389.6 million in 20042006 to €3,296.3€3,634.6 million in 2005. Apart from2007, primarily as a result of the changeincrease in operating cash flow, the reduction occurred becauseflows before changes in working capital. Working capital requirements increased by €52.2 millionslightly in 2005, whereas they had declined by €294.4 million in 2004. The slight increase in working capital requirements during 2005 was2007 given the resultgrowth of growth in our business.

Net cash from (used in) investing activities totaled -€2,540.2 million in 2005, compared to a net cash inflow of €174.6 million in 2004. In 2004, net cash from investing activities included €2,150 million in proceeds from strategic divestitures, specifically water assets in the United States and FCC. Excluding these items, net cash of -€1,975.4 million was used in investing activities in 2004. The increase of €564.8 million in net cash used in 2005 was mainly due to the €327 million (amount net of acquired cash) investment in the company that holds the Braunschweig contract and from the €154 million investment in the company that manages the Polish city of Lodz’s district heating network.activities.

Net cash used in financinginvesting activities roseincreased from -€1,795.5€2,904.0 million in 20042006 to -€3,152.8€4,018.4 million in 2005.2007. This increase of €1,114.4 million on 2006 was mainly due to investments in Sulo Group companies in Germany (€129 million), the Thermal North America Inc. Group in the United States (€308 million), VES Technitalia (formerly TMT) in Italy (€100.5 million) and an increase in capital expenditure of €501.1million.

In 2004, Financing cash flows changed from a net outflow of €71.5 million in 2006 to a net inflow of €940.8 million in 2007.  Fiscal year 2007 financing cash flows included:

a €2.6 billion share capital increase that was completed on July 10;

a €1 billion bond issue paying a fixed-rate interest of 5.125% and maturing May 2022, issued in May;

a GBP500 million bond issue issued in October (supplemented by an additional GBP150 million bond issue in January 2008); and

the proceeds from asset divestitures were used to repay our long-term borrowings.

In 2005:

·

€1,535 million was paid to redeem outstanding convertible bonds (known by their French acronym as OCEANEs);

·

€500 million was paid to redeem outstanding euro-medium term notesredemption of the EMTN issued in November 2005;2005 in the amount of €491 million.

·

borrowings to finance sales of receivables declined by €547 million;

·

€1,150 million was paid to partially redeem a bond issue maturing in 2008;

·

€300 million was paid to redeem subordinated notes redeemable in shares (TSARs);

and conversely:

·

€2,726 million in bonds were issued.

As a result of the cash flows described above, ourthe effects of foreign exchange rates representing a cash andoutflow of €102.8 million, net cash equivalents totaled €1,829.3€2,656.2 million atas of December 31, 2005,2007, compared to €4,240.2€2,202 million atas of December 31, 2004. Cash and cash equivalents were higher at the end of 2004 because of the need to repay our outstanding OCEANEs that matured on January 3, 2005.2006.

Sources of Funds

Financings

The main credit rating agencies,As of December 31, 2007, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s, have assigned investment-grade credit ratings to our company.  In June 2005, Moody’s upgraded its credit rating on our long-term debt from Baa1 to A3 (P-2 for our short-term debt) and confirmed its “stable” outlook on our company.  In December 2005, Standard & Poor’s confirmed our credit ratings (BBB+ for our long-term debt, BBB for our EMTN program and A-2 for our short-term debt) and its “stable” outlook on our company.  

In 2005, we pursued an active refinancing policy aimed at strengthening our financial condition and extending the maturity of our debt. The principal debt items that matured in 2005 and that were either repaid or refinanced werePoor's rated VE SA as follows:

Short-term

Long-term

Outlook

Recent events

Moody’s

P-2

A3

Stable

In October 2007, Moody’s confirmed the rating awarded to Veolia Environnement on June 27, 2005.

Standard and Poor's

A-2

BBB+

Stable

On June 12, 2007, Standard and Poor’s confirmed the rating awarded to Veolia Environnement on October 3, 2005.

On September 26, 2007, following the end of the structural subordination impacting Veolia Environnement debt, Standard and Poor’s increased the long-term rating awarded to bond issues from BBB to BBB+.

·

the OCEANEs convertible into Vivendi Universal shares, issued on April 26, 1999 and maturing on January 1, 2005, were fully repaid for €1,535.3 million, including a redemption premium of €91 million;

·

the Berlin contract acquisition debt incurred by RWE/Veolia Wasser Beteiligungs AG (RVB), totaling €600 million and maturing January 15, 2005, was fully refinanced for the same value for three years and will mature on January 15, 2008;

·

the €500 million of euro medium-term notes issued on November 8, 2001 and bearing interest at a fixed rate of 4.75% matured on November 8, 2005 and were redeemed;

·

finally, the subordinated loan notes redeemable in preference shares (TSARs) issued on December 28, 2001 by the subsidiary VEFO and maturing on December 28, 2006 were redeemed prior to maturity on March 31, 2005 for €300 million.

All of these financing transactions, conducted both on the capital markets and with banks, were intended to optimize our debt profile with an emphasis on (i) achieving a better match between assets and liabilities, (ii) extending the average maturity of our long-term debt, (iii) smoothing out our debt repayment schedule, (iv) diversifying our financing sources, and (v) taking best advantage of market conditions.

Our main financing activities in 2005 included:

·

on June 17, 2005, we issued bonds indexed to the inflation rate of the euro zone. This €600 million issuance matures in 10 years and bears interest at 1.75% plus the euro-zone’s ex-tobacco inflation rate. Our natural exposure to inflation – many contracts are indexed to sector price trends and hence indirectly to inflation – makes it logical for us to issue this type of instrument;



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 4192



Back to contentsContents


·Veolia Environnement pursued an active refinancing policy in 2007, aimed at strengthening its financial position and extending debt maturities.

onThe main debt facilities maturing in 2007 and either redeemed or refinanced were as follows:

€491 million EMTN issue (series 16), issued in November 2005 and maturing May 30, 2005, we issued €500 million2007 redeemed in a variable-rate “private placement”full at 3-month Euribor +0.07%, with a maturity, of 18 months; and

·

on December 12, 2005, we carried out the following two-pronged transaction:

-

we repurchased part of our outstandings under our June 2008 bond€142 million EMTN issue for €1.15 billion. This issue originally totaled €2.0 billion. Following a partial repurchase(series 19), issued in early 2004, outstandings totaled €1.85 billion,January 2006 and

-

we issued €1.5 billion maturing July 18, 2007, redeemed in bonds in two tranches:

·

a €900 million, 10-year issue maturing in February 2016, with a nominal coupon of 4%, and

·

a €600 million, 15-year issue maturing in December 2020, with a nominal coupon of 4.375%.

Our main refinancing activities in 2005 related to bank debt included:full at maturity.


·

on July 29, 2005, we refinanced our CZK 8 billion syndicated loan maturing in November 2008 with a CZK 12 billion two-tranche credit facility, one maturing in seven years (CZK 4 billion) and the other maturing in five years (CZK 8 billion). There were two reasons for this refinancing: (i) covering all of the needs of Czech subsidiaries at particularly favorable terms while (ii) maintaining flexibility by extending maturity dates;


·

on January 15, 2005, the Berlin contract acquisition debt of €600 million incurred by RWE/In addition, Veolia Berliner Wasser Beteiligungs AG (RVB) was refinanced for three years.


At the same time, we sought to optimize the cost and maturity profile of our debt financing throughEnvironnement launched the following transactions:


·

Refinancingnew bond issues for a total euro equivalent of the €3.5 billion syndicated loan: On April 21, 2005, we entered into a new, €4 billion, seven-year syndicated loan to refinance the €3.5 billion, five-year syndicated loan entered into on February 19, 2004. Apart from extending the maturity of our commitments, this refinancing enabled us to achieve a significant reduction in the cost of this facility;


·

Renegotiation of bilateral facilities: we pursued negotiations aimed at extending the maturity of our existing bilateral lines of credit, at renewing maturing lines and at implementing new, principally medium-term lines of credit. The average maturity of bilateral lines nearly doubled from two to four years. As€1,882 million as of December 31, 2005, credit lines totaled €9752007:

in February, a €200 million including €250bond issue paying floating-rate interest (Euribor 3M+0.50%), maturing August 2008,

in May, a €1 billion bond issue paying fixed-rate interest of 5.125%, maturing May 2022,

in October, a GBP 500 million short-term, fully-undrawn lines.bond issue paying fixed-rate interest of 6.125%, maturing October 2037.


TheNo major bank financing was provided or repaid in 2007.  Our existing syndicated credit documentation and bilateral credit lines do not contain no disruptiveany events of default tied to restrictive financial covenants (such as debt payout ratios or interest coverage ratios).  The debt payout ratio (the ratio between net debt and operating cash flow adjusted for certain items) is used to determine the margin applicable to certain significant financings under pricing grids, such as the syndicated credit lines signed in 2004 for a maximum aggregate amount of US$1.25 billion (drawn down in the amount of approximately €544 million as of December 31, 2007).  

Financial ratios may also be used in certain project financings, which are generally implemented through special purpose entities, for which the financing is based on the cash flows generated by the relevant project.  These project financings, the amounts of which are not individually significant at the Group level, are either without recourse or with limited recourse.  In addition, in certain cases multilateral development banks may require our affiliates to include financial covenants.ratios relating to the financial statements of those entities in their financing agreements.

We centralize our significant financings to ensure optimization.  Certain financings contracted by the parent company contain restrictions on structural subordination intended to assure lenders that the majority of the financings are at the level of Veolia Environnement.

Our financial debt structure as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 is reflected in the following table, which also provides a reconciliation of our total borrowings to net financial debt.

(€ million)

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31,2006

Non current borrowings

13,948.0

14,001.6

Current borrowings

3,805.0

2,904.1

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

459.4

456.0

Sub-total borrowings

18,212.4

17,361.7

Cash and cash equivalents

(3,115.6)

(2,658.0)

Fair value on hedging instruments

27.7

(28.8)

Net financial debt

15,124.5

14,674.9




93



Back to Contents


The following table shows our net financial debt, which represents gross financial debt (long-term borrowings, short-term borrowings, bank overdrafts), net of cash and cash equivalents and excluding revaluation of hedging instruments, at December 31, 2005 and 2004:


(in € millions)

December 31,2005

December 31, 2004

Long-term borrowings

13,722.8

12,157.0

Short-term borrowings

2,138.2

5,426.1

Bank overdrafts

506.8

420.1

Sub-total, financial debt

16,367.8

18,003.2

Cash and cash equivalents

-2,336.1

-4,660.3

Less fair value on hedging instruments

-161.1

-284.0

Net financial debt

13,870.6

13,058.9

- Long-term and short-term financial loans and marketable securities

-2,775.0

-2,763.4

Economic net debt

11,095.6

10,295.5


The following table listssets forth the aggregate maturitiesmaturity schedule of our long-term borrowings atas of December 31, 2005:2007:

  

Payments Due by Period
——————————————

(in millions of €)

Total

1 to 2 years

2 to 5 years

Over 5 years

 

————

————

————

————

Bank Loans

5,864.9

1,798.0

1,936.8

2,130.1

Bonds

7,857.9

550.8

883.8

6,423.3

 

————

————

————

————

Total

13,722.8

2,348.8

2,820.6

8,553.4

 

=========

=========

=========

=========

(€ million)

Total

Amounts falling due in

2 to 3 years

4 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Bond issues

9,009.6

122.3

1,020.5

7,866.8

Bank borrowings

4,938.4

1,636.4

1,120.2

2,181.8

Non current borrowings

13,948.0

1,758.7

2,140.7

10,048.6

We monitor

Shareholders Equity

In order to support our growth strategy and to benefit from market conditions, we launched a cash rights offering (augmentation de capital avec maintien des droits préférentiels de souscription des actionnaires) on June 12, for an amount of €2,581.5 million (before deduction of share issue costs against additional paid-in capital).  The subscription period opened on June 14 and closed on June 27, 2007. Overall, the liquiditytransaction resulted in the issuance of 51,941,040 new shares with a par value of €5 each, representing a share capital increase of €259.7 million and the recognition of additional paid-in capital of €2,321.8 million.  This fund-raising transaction enabled in particular the Group to strengthen its equity and increase its financial flexibility and thereby continue its development under good conditions.

In addition, third parties acquired minority interests in certain consolidated companies in 2007, in line with our group in coordination with designated managers at the relevant operating level.  We centralize the incurrence and management of new material financings of our groupobjective to find partners in order to steerexploit commercial opportunities and/or dilute our presentrisk exposure in certain countries.  These transactions, which provided us with funds of €206 million in 2007, included primarily the following:

the acquisition of a 10% stake by the EBRD in Veolia Voda, the holding company for Veolia Eau activities in Central and future liquidity to optimum levels.  We satisfy our financing needs through bank loans, commercial paperEastern Europe, by way of a share capital increase of €90.4 million;

the acquisition by IFC/Proparco of a stake in the share capital of the water division holding company for activities in the Middle East and debt issues on Africa, generating funds of €34.8 million;

the international capital marketsacquisition by partners of stakes in Chinese contracts of the water division (Lanzhou and the international private placement markets.Liuzhou), generating funds of €64.2 million.

At December 31, 2005, we had the following sources of funds available:

millions of €

Our Company

Undrawn Portion of Medium-Term Syndicated Loans

4,069

Undrawn Medium-Term Credit Lines

725

Undrawn Short-Term Credit Lines

250

Marketable Securities

--

Cash and Cash Equivalents

954

——————

Our Subsidiaries

Marketable Securities

61

Cash and Cash Equivalents

1,383

=============

Total

7,442

As of December 31, 2005, we had sources of funds available that totaled €7.4 billion, of which €2.4 billion was comprised of marketable securities and cash and cash equivalents.  During 2005, we undertook several actions to optimize our liquidity, as described above. We believe that our future capital requirements, including those for organic growth and selected acquisitions, can be met from operating cash flow, available financings and disposals of assets.

Divestitures and Disposals of Assets

Our assetAsset divestitures totaled €348.1€415 million in 2005, and €327.52007, or €394.6 million net of the cash of companies sold.  These transactions included both financial divestitures and industrial divestitures.

Financial divestitures in 2005, which totaled €174.62007 included primarily the following (€202 million excluding cash balances of companies sold,sold):

19% of Veolia Service Environnement Maroc (Veolia Eau) for €36.4 million,

transportation activities in Spain for €24.0 million,

shares in Residuos Industriales Multiquim SA by SARPI Mexico for €13.1 million,

transportation activities in Denmark for €11.6 million,

a 39% stake in Proactiva Mexico for €9.9 million.


The main industrial divestitures in 2007 totaled €212.9 million and included primarily the following items:transactions:

sale of Fawley installations in the United Kingdom in the environmental services division for GBP24 million (€35.8 million);

sale of buildings, in particular in the Netherlands in the transportation division, for €16 million.

other industrial asset sales reflecting mainly the handover of operating assets.




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 4294



Back to contentsContents


·In addition, principal payments received on operating financial assets totaled €360.7 million in 2007, compared to €438.1 million in 2006.  

a minority stake in Acque Potabili (Veolia Water in Italy) for €20.9 million;

·

a 20% stake in a company that owns Bonna Sabla (Veolia Water in France) for €35.8 million;

·

CBM (Veolia Transportation in France) for €31.5 million;

·

the Portuguese business of Veolia Environmental Services for €18 million;

·

maintenance services for the nuclear energy industry (Veolia Energy Services (Dalkia)) for €17 million.

Cash related to financial divestitures totaled a negative €20.6 million, due essentially to a negative €6 million related to Connex Transport Ireland.

The principal industrial divestitures in 2005, which totaled €173.5 million, included the following items:

·

a block of properties in Norway belonging to Veolia Environmental Services for €19 million;

·

a New Zealand business belonging to Veolia Environmental Services for €12 million;

·

other industrial assets with individual values of less than €10 million and essentially representing rotation of operating assets.

Use of FundsCapital Expenditures

The following table shows a breakdown of our capital expenditures during 20042006 and 2005:2007:

(in € millions)

Industrial investments(1)

Financial investments(2)

New IFRIC 4 loans

 

2005

2004

2005

2004

2005

2004

       

Water

912

861

614

185

174

161

Waste Management

739

710

105

53

3

-

Energy Services

252

247

203

88

85

5

Transportation

195

153

175

67

7

11

Other

30

126

1

42

-

-

Total

2,128

2,097

1,098

435

269

177

(1)

Including those financed through capital leases.

(2)

Excluding cash and cash equivalents of acquired companies.


(€ million)

Industrial investments (1)

Financial investments (2)

New operating financial assets

 

2007

2006

2007

2006

2007

2006

Water

866

853

794

214

280

262

Environmental Services

846

692

482

875

32

20

Energy Services

429

318

547

102

73

63

Transportation

459

302

101

253

36

16

Other

42

32

42

8

-

-

Total

2,642

2,197

1,966

1,452

421

361

(1) including assets purchased under finance lease

(2) excluding cash and cash equivalents of companies acquired


Industrial Investmentsinvestments

Industrial investments excluding(excluding assets purchased under finance leases) totaled €2,519 million in 2007, an increase of 25% compared to 2006 capital expenditure of €2,018 million.   Industrial investments financed through capitalincluding assets purchased under finance leases totaled €2,081.9€2,642 million in 2005,2007 and broke down as follows:

€866 million in the water division (up 1.5% compared to €1,964.02006), including growth investment of €335 million and maintenance-related investment of €531 million (€498 million in 2004, representing a moderate rise of 6%2006). In 2004, these figures included €100

€846 million in investments relatedthe environmental services division (up 22.3% compared to FCC.2006), including growth investment of €292 million and maintenance-related investment of €554 million. The increase in capital expenditure mainly reflects the growth of the environmental services division and the launch of a number of major industrial projects in France (new storage capacity) and Italy (incinerator).

Investments including those financed through capital leases totaled €2,128

€429 million in 2005,the Energy Services Division (up 34.9% compared to 2006), including growth investment of €166 million and were mademaintenance-related investment of €263 million. This increase in our different divisionsinvestment reflects activity growth and, in particular, the construction of heat and electricity production installations in France.

€459 million in the following manner:transportation division (up 52.0% compared to 2006), including growth investment of €233 million and maintenance-related investment of €226 million. Capital expenditure includes the purchase of the Jean Nicoli ship by SNCM.

·

industrial investments in our water division amountedMaintenance-related investment totaled €1,590 million (4.9% of revenue), compared to €912€1,417 million in 2005 (an increase2006 (5% of 5.9% over 2004), of which €328 million were for growth-related spending and €584 million were for replacement and maintenance spending;revenue).

·

industrial investments in our waste management division amounted to €739 million in 2005 (an increase of 4.1% over 2004), of which €207 million were for growth-related spending and €532 million were for replacement and maintenance spending;

·

industrial investments in our energy services division amounted to €252 million in 2005 (an increase of 2.0% over 2004), of which €81 million were for growth-related spending and €171 million were for replacement and maintenance spending; and

·

industrial investments in our transportation division amounted to €195 million in 2005 (an increase of 27.5% over 2004), of which €67 million were for growth-related spending and €128 million were for replacement and maintenance spending.

Financial Investments

Financial investments, including net€131 million of cash borrowingsand cash equivalent balances of companies acquired companies of -€154in 2007, totaled €1,835 million in 2005, totaled €9442007, compared to €1,291 million in 2005, compared to €334 million in 2004. 2006.

In 2004, these2006, financial investments included €32primarily the acquisition by Veolia Eau of Banska Bystrica and Poprad in Slovakia for €71 million related to FCC.

Financial investments (excluding cashand of acquired companies) totaled €1,098 million in 2005,the Kunming and were made in our different divisions in the following manner:

·

financial investments in our water division amounted to €614 million in 2005, compared to €185 million in 2004. The principal financial investments related to the Braunschweig contract (€374 million), acquiredLiuzhou contracts in China (€62 million) and in Australia (€16 million), where we bought 47.5 %for €60 million, the acquisition by Veolia Propreté of United Water, previously held by Thames Water, andCleanaway in the United Kingdom the acquisition of the engineering company Weir Techna for €41 million;

·

financial investments in our waste management division amounted to €105 million in 2005, compared to €53 million in 2004. Shanks’ toxic waste business in the United Kingdom was acquired for €43 million, the minority interests in Onyx Norway were bought out for €11€745 million and Vasko was acquired in North Americaof Biffa Belgium for €16 million;

·

financial investments in our energy services division amounted to €203 million in 2005, compared to €88 million in 2004, including the Lodz acquisition in Poland for €171€63 million and the purchaseacquisition by Veolia Transport of Conade, a Chilean company,SNCM for €8 million; and

·

financial investments in our transportation division amounted to €175 million in 2005, compared to €67 million in 2004. The principal investments were in Norway, where we acquired Helgelandske for €20€72 million and of Shuttleport and Supershuttle in the United States where we acquired ATC/Vancom for €77€100 million.

Cash related to financial investments totaled €154 million, related essentially to the Braunschweig (€47 million), Weir Techna (€20 million) and Lodz (€17 million) companies.

Financing on behalf of third parties (IFRIC 4 loans)

Certain of our contracts qualify for treatment as lease contracts pursuant to IAS 17 and its interpretation IFRIC 4.  IFRIC 4 seeks to identify the contractual terms and conditions of agreements which, without taking the legal form of a lease, convey a right to use an asset in return for payments included in the overall contract remuneration. It identifies in such agreements, based on the allocation of the risks and rewards of ownership, a lease contract which is then analyzed and accounted for in accordance with the criteria laid down in IAS 17. The contract operator—in this case, our company—therefore becomes a lessor with respect to its customers. Where the lease transfers the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset in accordance with IAS 17 criteria, the contract operator recognizes a loan (an “IFRIC 4 loan”) to reflect the corresponding financing.  

Our contracts that satisfy the criteria set forth in IFRIC 4 are either outsourcing contracts with industrial customers, “Build Operate and Transfer” (BOT) contracts or incineration or co-generation contracts, under which, in particular, the risks associated with the level of demand or volume are in substance transferred to our customer.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 4395



Back to contentsContents


Our project financingFinancial investments of €1,966 million in 2007 (excluding cash and cash equivalents balances of companies acquired) broke down as follows:

€794 million in the form of IFRIC 4 loans totaled €269water division (compared to €214 million in 2005, compared to €1772006). The main financial investments concern the non-regulated assets of Thames Water for €86 million, the acquisition of the Lanzhou, Haikou and Tianjin Shibei in China (for €98 million, €91 million and €219 million respectively), the assets of the Process Services Division of Tetra Technologies for €43 million and the acquisition of Anox Kaldnes, a Swedish technology company, for €74 million.

€482 million in 2004, representing a rise of 52.0%.

Investments through IFRIC 4 loans were made in our different divisions in the following manner:

·

investments in our waterenvironmental services division amounted(compared to €173.7€875 million in 2005, up 8.1% from 2004, due to progress on construction projects2006). The main financial investments concern the acquisition of Sulo in Europe (The HagueGermany for €156 million (net of the proceeds of the sale of the ET Division at the end of July 2007), of VES Tecnitalia (formerly TMT) in Italy for €104 million and Brussels), partially offset by project start-ups in Asia;

·

investments in our waste management division amounted to €2.8 million in 2005, essentiallyAllied assets in the United Kingdom;States for €71 million.

·

investments in our energy services division amounted to €85.4 million in 2005, compared to €5 million in 2004. These investments occurred principally in France, with €52.1€547 million in the co-generation subsidiaries and €11.1Energy Services Division (compared to €102 million in Italy;2006). The main financial investments concern the acquisition of Thermal North America, Inc. for €316 million, of Hungarian companies for €63 million, of Kolin in the Czech Republic for €27 million and of cogeneration companies in Germany for €29.5 million.

·

investments€101 million in ourthe transportation division amounted(compared to €7.4€253 million in 2006). The main financial investments concern the acquisition of People Travel Group (PTG) in Sweden for €46.6 million and of “transport-on-demand” companies in the United States for €19 million.


Cash balances of companies acquired total €131 million and mainly concern Sulo Group companies in the amount of €26 million.

New Operating Financial Assets (IFRIC 12 and IFRIC 4 loans)

New operating financial assets were €421 million in 2007, compared to €361 million in 2006.  The 2007 figure breaks down as follows:

€280 million in the water division, an increase of €18 million compared to 2006; this increase is mainly attributable to the Oman Sur BOT contract in the amount of €47 million and the increase in Berlin Water receivables for €26 million, offset by a decline€60 million reduction in BOT construction activities in Belgium and the Netherlands.

€32 million in the environmental services division, an increase of 36.4% from 2004.  €5€12 million compared to 2006.

€73 million in the Energy Services Division, an increase of these investments related€10 million compared to Spanish contracts.2006.

€36 million in the transportation division, an increase of €20 million compared to 2006.


Research and Development; Patents and Licenses

See “Information on the Company—Business Overview—Research and Development” and “Information on the Company—Business Overview—Intellectual Property” for a description of our investments in these areas.

ManagementGoodwill

Goodwill amounted to €6,913.2 million at December 31, 2007, compared to  €5,705.0 million at December 31, 2006. The increase of Investments – €1,208.2 million reflects our growth during fiscal year 2007: €748.2 million of the increase relates to the Cash Generating Unit (“CGU”) Environmental Services Germany, following the acquisition of Sulo, €139.6 million relates to the CGU Energy North America (acquisition of Thermal North America Inc.) and €114.6 million relates to the CGU Environmental Services Italy (acquisition of VSA Tecnitalia, formerly TMT).  The CGUs of each division are concentrated in France, the United States, Germany, Great Britain and the Czech Republic.

The CGUs carrying the most significant amounts of goodwill at December 31, 2007 were Environmental Services United Kingdom (€824.2 million), Water France Distribution (€760.5 million) and Environmental Services Germany (€748.2 million).



96



Back to Contents


Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)

Our investment policy requires us to analyze different criteria in making investment decisions, including decisions relating to capital expenditures and financial investments.  In order to manage the profitability of our contracts globally, we use a measure of performance, which we refer to as “return on capital employed” or “ROCE,” that measures our ability to provide a return on the capital invested in our business.  We define ROCE as the ratio of (i) our results of operations, net of tax, and our share of net income of associates excluding revenue from financing on behalf of third parties (return on IFRIC 4 loans),operating financial assets, divided by (ii) the average amount of capital employed in our business during the same year.

The following table showsSince the calculationshift to IFRS in 2005, for purposes of our resultsROCE calculation, capital employed excludes financial operating assets, and operating income excludes the related income. The implementation of IFRIC12 in 2006 introduced important modifications affecting financial operating assets, which are accounted for in the financial statements.  

Net income from operations net of tax, in 2004 and 2005:is calculated as follows:

(in € millions)

2005

2004

   

Recurring operating income

1,903.6

1,619.6

Revenue from financing on behalf of third parties

-125.8

-96.7

Share of net income of associates

14.9

24.9

Income tax expense(1)

-402.1

-322.5

Net results of operations

1,390.6

1,225.3

(1)

In 2004, the financial restructuring transactions that followed the divestiture of U.S. businesses generated tax-loss carry forwards recognized in the consolidated
balance sheet. Given its exceptional character, an amount of €138 million, representing the gain in earnings, was eliminated from the calculation of ROCE. In 2005,
the use of these carry forwards led to a €21 million charge, which was also eliminated from the ROCE calculation.

(€ million)

2007

2006

Adjusted operating income

2,469.2

2,222.2

+ Share of net income of associates

16.9

6.0

- Income tax expense(1) (2)

(406.9)

(463.2)

- Revenue from operating financial assets

(345.1)

(351.0)

+ Income tax expense allocated to operating financial assets

62.5

54.5

Net income from operations

1,796.6

1,468.5

   

(1)

In 2004, the financial restructuring transactions following the divestiture of the U.S. activities of the water division generated tax losses which were recognized in the consolidated balance sheet. Given its exceptional nature, the resulting credit of €138.4 million recognized in net income was eliminated from the calculation of ROCE. The utilization of these tax losses in 2006 and 2007 generated charges of €32.7 million and €24.2 million respectively, which were similarly eliminated from the calculation of ROCE.

(2)

In 2006, the deferred tax credit of €86.3 million relating to the restructuring of the U.S. tax group was eliminated from adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent, and also from the calculation of ROCE. In 2007, a tax benefit of €11 million (relating to an SNCM tax status) was excluded from this calculation.  


We determine the average amount ofAverage capital employed in our businessduring the year is defined as the average of ouropening and closing capital employed at each of the beginning and the end of the year.employed.   Capital employed is defined asequal to the sum of all net intangible assets netand property, plant and equipment, goodwill net of impairment, investments in associates, net operating and non-operating working capital requirements and net derivative instruments less provisions and other non-current liabilities.debts.   Capital employed is calculated as follows:

(€ million)

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31,2006

As of December 31,2005

Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, net(1)

14,117.8

11,644.1

10,258.9

Goodwill, net of impairment

6,913.2

5,705.0

4,752.3

Investments in associates

292.1

241.0

201.5

Operating and non-operating working capital requirements, net(2)

(33.2)

198.8

160.8

Net derivative instruments and other(3)

79.4

26.9

(66.6)

Provisions

(2,964.7)

(3,022.5)

(2,402.0)

Other non-current debt

-

(207.3)

(203.7)

Capital employed

18,404.6

14,585.0

12,701.2

Average capital employed

16,494.8

13,643.1

N/A

    

(1)

including the investment in Tianjin Shibei (water division) for €219 million

(2)

including net deferred tax but excluding deferred tax relating to U.S. divestitures and related restructurings (€60.7 million in 2007, €84.9 million in 2006 and €117.6 million in 2005).

(3)

excluding derivatives hedging the fair value of debt for €27.7 million in 2007, €(28.8) million in 2006 and €(161.1) million in  2005.



The following table shows the calculation of the average amount of our97



Back to Contents


Our return on capital employed (ROCE) in 2003, 20042006 and 2005:

(in € millions)

December 31,2005

December 31,2004

December 31,2003

Net property, plant & equipment and net intangible assets

13,523.0

12,017.1

11,884.0

Goodwill net of impairment

4,863.1

4,383.6

4,256.6

Investments in associates

201.5

219.2

225.9

Net operating and non-operating working capital requirement (1)

269.7

308.6

945.6

Provisions

-2,387.4

-2,006.5

-1,968.6

Other non-current liabilities

-362.2

-353.6

-372.4

Capital employed

16,107.7

14,568.4

14,965.1

Average capital employed

15,338.1

14,766.8

 

(1)

Including net deferred tax but excluding deferred tax related to U.S. divestitures and related restructurings (€126 million in 2004 and €117 million in 2005).


The following table shows the calculation of our ROCE in 2004 and 2005:2007 was determined as follows:



(in € millions)

Net results of operations

Average capital employed during the year

ROCE

    

2005

1,390.6

15,338.1

9.1%

2004

1,225.3

14,766.8

8.3%

(€ million)

Net income from operations

Average capital employed during the year

ROCE

2007

1,796.6

16,494.8

10.9%

2006

1,468.5

13,643.1

10.8%


Unlike the intermediate balances of our income statement line items, ROCE is not significantly affected byrelatively insensitive to fluctuations in currencyforeign exchange rates.   The positive changeTherefore, ROCE improved slightly in ROCE2007 despite the marked increase in 2005 reflectedaverage capital employed as a result of activity growth and acquisitions. This is due to the combined effectimpact of productivity measures, the increased maturity of the Veolia Environnement 2005 efficiency plan, further maturing of our contract portfolio, the contribution of companies acquired and our control over capital employed.


the improvement in the income tax expense.

Contractual Obligations

We have various contractual obligations arising from our operations. These obligations are more fully described in this document under various headings in this “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” as well as in the notes to our consolidated financial statements.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 44



Back to contents


The following table lists the aggregate maturities of our long-term debt, operating leases, capital leases and closure and post-closure costs (Waste)(principally Waste) at December 31, 20052007 (in millions of euro)euros):

 

Payments Due by Period

 

Payments Due by Period

 

 

Contractual Obligations

Total

Less than
2 years

2 to 5 years

After  5 years

Total

Less than
2 years

2 to 5 years

After  5 years

————

————

————

————

Long-Term Debt Obligations(1)

13,722.8

2,348.8

2,820.6

8,553.4

Long-Term Debt Obligations(1) (2)

16,872.9

3,679.4

3,422.6

9,770.9

Operating Lease Obligations(3)

1,894.5

821.3

760.2

313.0

2,190.0

495.0

1,190.6

504.4

Capital Lease Obligations(3)

1,081.0

329.7

326.3

425.0

1,139.9

172.9

585.3

381.7

Closure and post-closure (Waste)

335.4

47.4

128.7

159.3

Closure and post-closure

539.5

60.0

185.3

294.2

————

————

————

————

Total

17,033.7

3,547.2

4,035.8

9,450.7

20,742.3

4,407.3

5,383.8

10,951.2

=========

=========

=========

=========

_____________________

  

(1)

The weighted average interest rate on our long-term debt obligations during 2005 was 5.12%. This weighted average interest rate takes into account the effect of our derivative instruments. A description of the way in which we account for derivative instruments and manage the market risks to which we are exposed is set forth in Note 34 to our consolidated financial statements. After taking into account hedging transactions, 65.2% of our net debt bears interest at fixed rates. After further taking into account the impact of interest rate caps, this percentage increases to 73%. Assuming a constant net debt policy, a 1% increase in interest rates would generate an increase in the annual weighted average interest rate, excluding market impact, of 0.35 %.

  

(1)

Including non current and current borrowings, but excluding capital lease (see (3) below).

(2)

We are also obligated to pay interest on our long-term and other debt obligations. To measure our obligations, we use a tool that we call the “financing rate,” which we define as the ratio between the cost of net debt (equal to finance costs, net, excluding fair value adjustments on financial instruments not qualifying for hedge accounting ) to average net indebtedness (based on a quarterly weighted average, and determined in the manner set forth above under “—Sources of Funds – Financings”). In 2007, the financing rate was 5.49%. A description of the way in which we account for derivative instruments and manage the market risks to which we are exposed is set forth in Note 30 to our consolidated financial statements. After taking into account hedging transactions, 53.6% of our financial debt bears interest at fixed rates. After further taking into account the impact of interest rate caps, this percentage increases to 61.3%. Assuming a constant net debt policy, a 0.5% increase in interest rates would generate an increase in net finance costs of €15 million.

(3)

Corresponds to future minimum lease payments.

(1)

Including non current and current borrowings, but excluding capital lease (see (3) below).

(2)

We are also obligated to pay interest on our long-term and other debt obligations. To measure our obligations, we use a tool that we call the “financing rate,” which we define as the ratio between the cost of net debt (equal to finance costs, net, excluding fair value adjustments on financial instruments not qualifying for hedge accounting ) to average net indebtedness (based on a quarterly weighted average, and determined in the manner set forth above under “—Sources of Funds – Financings”). In 2007, the financing rate was 5.49%. A description of the way in which we account for derivative instruments and manage the market risks to which we are exposed is set forth in Note 30 to our consolidated financial statements. After taking into account hedging transactions, 53.6% of our financial debt bears interest at fixed rates. After further taking into account the impact of interest rate caps, this percentage increases to 61.3%. Assuming a constant net debt policy, a 0.5% increase in interest rates would generate an increase in net finance costs of €15 million.

(3)

Corresponds to future minimum lease payments.


Off Balance Sheet Arrangements


The following discussion of our material off-balance sheet commitments should be read together with Note 4238 to our consolidated financial statements included herein, which discusses such commitments in greater detail. In the ordinary course of our business, we may enter into various contractual commitments with third parties which are not recorded in our balance sheet.  These commitments include, among others, operational guarantees, financial guarantees, obligations to buy or sell and letters of credit given on our part.  Operational guarantees constitute the greatest share of these off-balance sheet commitments, which we generally use to guarantee the performance commitments given by our subsidiaries to their customers. Often, these performance commitments are guaranteed by an insurance company or a financial institution, which then requires a counter-guarantee from us.



98



Back to Contents


Specific Commitments Given


Berlin Water Contract

Under the Berlin water contract, the Group may be required to purchase rights of passage for water pipes from landowners. The gross amount of this investment could reach €426 million (50%), approximately €175 million of which would be borne by the Berlin Lander, representing a net commitment of €250 million. In the event of acquisition of these rights from landowners, the amounts paid would be recorded in operating financial assets in the Group balance sheet, net and remunerated under the contract.

Agreements with EDF

Veolia Environnement granted EDF a call option covering all of its Dalkia shares in the event an EDF competitor takes control of the company. Likewise EDF granted Veolia Environnement a call option covering all of its Dalkia shares, exercisable in the event of a change in the legal status of EDF or should a Veolia Environnement competitor, acting alone or in concert, take control of EDF. Failing an agreement on the share transfer price, this would be decided by an expert.  

Other Commitments Given


The following is a breakdown of the off-balance sheet commitments given in(other than the ordinary coursespecific commitments described above) as of our business (in millionsthe end of euros):2006 and 2007:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2007

Maturity (at year-end 2007)

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Operational guarantees including performance bonds

4,043.6

5,591.4

852.9

2,588.4

2,150.1

Financial guarantees

 

 

   

Debt guarantees

300.7

355.6

128.3

153.9

73.4

Vendor warranties given

448.6

480.0

140.6

198.0

141.4

Commitments given

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase commitments

149.3

589.9

445.0

109.1

35.8

Sales commitments

31.3

27.2

9.8

15.4

2.0

Letters of credit

904.5

573.8

327.7

241.1

5.0

Other commitments given

749.8

383.5

177.0

74.3

132.2

Total

6,627.8

8,001.4

2,081.3

3,380.2

2,539.9


(in € millions)

As of December 31, 2004

As of December 31, 2005

Maturity

 

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

      

Operational guarantees

2,713.9

2,963.5

548.5

1,462.0

953.0

Financial guarantees

     

Debt guarantees

154.6

250.8

55.5

99.5

95.8

Warranty obligations given

488.7

515.5

13.8

164.1

337.6

Commitments given

     

Obligations to buy

101.0

94.6

20.6

64.9

9.1

Obligations to sell

28.5

8.6

8.6

-

-

Other commitments given

     

Letters of credit

578.5

819.7

282.0

515.8

21.9

Other commitments given

807.0

772.2

160.6

336.5

275.1

Total

4,872.2

5,424.9

1,089.6

2,642.8

1,692.5


The following is a breakdown of such commitments by division:


(in € millions)

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

  

(€ million)

As of December  31,
 2007

As of December 31,  2006

Water

2,388.4

2,334.5

4,368.3

3,253.2

Waste Management

715.2

645.2

Environmental Services

1,171.1

876.7

Energy Services

541.6

497.7

755.7

543.0

Transportation

274.4

216.7

398.3

294.9

Proactiva

10.3

12.9

39.8

5.7

Holding companies

1,439.8

1,131.1

1,241.5

1,598.3

Other

55.2

34.1

26.7

56.0

Total

5,424.9

4,872.2

8,001.4

6,627.8


In addition, we sometimes enter into off-balance sheetOur commitments outsideincreased most significantly in the ordinary courseWater division in 2007, primarily as a result of our business.  The most significantnew construction contracts won in the Middle East and Australia and the impact of these commitments are described below.new acquisitions during the year.


Southern Water Operation


In 2003, we refinanced our investment in Southern Water.  As a result, we entered into contracts with Société Générale Bank et Trust SA and CDC Ixis on June 30, 2003 and July 18, 2003, respectively.  Under these contracts, each of Société Générale Bank et Trust SA and CDC Ixis purchased £110 million of preferred shares without voting rights issued by Southern Water and may require us to purchase the preferred shares they hold in Southern Water Investments after five years, at an average exercise price that has been adjusted by an annual yield of 5.5%. These put options relate to unlisted companies for which the fair value cannot be determined with sufficient reliability. No impairment losses had been identified in respect of these put options as of December 31, 2005.


On April 10, 2006, we sold our interest in Southern Water. See “Item 8. Financial Information—Significant Changes—Veolia Water” for further information.




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 4599



Back to contentsContents


Replacement Obligation


We and our water and heat distribution subsidiaries, as part of our contractual obligations under concession contracts and in return for the revenues we receive, assume responsibility for the replacement of assets in the publicly owned utility networks we manage.  We estimate our future expenditures required in this regard based on the remaining life of the relevant contracts. Our accumulated expenditure forecast is estimated at €2.3 billion (€1.8 billion for water and €0.5 billion for energy) as of December 31, 2005. These expenditures will either be expensed or amortized over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets concerned or the contract period, according to the contract terms.

Performance Bonds for U.S. Subsidiaries


Various insurance companies have issued performance guarantees in connection with the activities of our U.S. subsidiaries (operational guarantees, site restoration guarantees), which we have underwritten up to a maximum amount of US$1.4 billion (US$0.2 billion used at December 31, 2005).


Berlin Water Contract


Under the Berlin water contract, we may be obligated to purchase rights of passage for water pipes from landowners still not indemnified who present claims for payments. The cost to us could total €610 million (50%).


Agreements with EDF


In connection with EDF’s 34% interest in our energy services subsidiary, Dalkia, EDF has granted us a call option with respect to its Dalkia shares in the event of a change in its status and a takeover bid launched for it by one of our competitors, with the price per share to be agreed upon. Likewise, we have granted a call option to EDF with respect to our Dalkia shares in the event a takeover bid is launched against us by a competitor of EDF.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 46



Back to contents


ITEM 6: DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT

Our company has been asociété anonyme à conseil d’administration since its general shareholders’ meeting held on April 30, 2003,, which is a French corporation with a single board of directors.directors, since its general shareholders’ meeting held on April 30, 2003. Our shares are quotedlisted on the Eurolist ofEuronext Paris by NYSE Euronext and on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). We are subject to French regulations, in particular relating to corporate governance, and to regulations applicable to foreign companies listed in the U.S.United States.

Board of Directors

At its meeting on April 30, 2003, ourOur board of directors has adopted an internal charter, as well as internal charters for each boardthe accounts and audit committee aimed at followingand the nominations and compensation committee, respectively.  The purpose of these charters was to apply the recommendations of the report of a French blue ribbon panelworking group chaired by Mr. Daniel Bouton forrelating to the improvement of corporate governance practices in French public companies.companies (known as the “Bouton report”).  We believe that our practices conform to currently standard corporate governance practices in France.

Composition and Appointmentappointment

Our company’s board of directors must have between 3 and 18 members, subject tounless otherwise provided under applicable law. Each director must own at least 750 of ourthe Company’s shares in registered form.  Each director is elected by the shareholders at an ordinary general meeting of the shareholders for a renewable six-year term, based on proposals bythe nominations of the board of directors, which itselfin turn receives proposals from the nominations and compensation committee. The board of directors elects a chairman and, if necessary, one or two vice-chairmen, for a term not exceedingwhich cannot exceed the lengthterms of office of such persons’individuals’ terms as directors.

Our directors can be removed from office at any time by a majority shareholder vote at any time.of the shareholders.  

The board of directors does not include any members elected by the employees or any deputy directors (censeurs), but; however, a representative of ourthe Company’s works council attendsparticipates in board of director meetings in a consultative role.capacity.

The terms of half of all members of our boarddirectors (or, if we have an uneven number of directors, half plus one additional director) come upare subject to for renewal every three years on a rolling basis.  Accordingly, the terms of seven pre-selected directors (Serge Michel, Daniel Bouton, Jean-Marc Espalioux, Jacques Espinasse, Paul-Louis Girardot, Georges Ralli and Murray Stuart) came up for renewal or replacement at the shareholders’ meeting held on May 11, 2006.  Following this meeting, the terms of half of all members of our board (or, if we have an uneven number of directors, half plus one additional director) will come up for renewal or replacement every three years based on seniority of appointment.

The board of directors currently consists of 14 members, 7 of whom were elected atmembers.  

In accordance with these provisions, the ordinarycombined general meeting of shareholders on April 30, 2003, and 7 of whom were elected at the ordinary general meeting of shareholders on May 11, 2006.

Following the recommendations made by the nominations and compensation committee at the board of directors’ meeting held on March 28, 2006, the shareholders’ meeting of May 11, 2006 renewed  the terms of Serge Michel, Daniel Bouton, Jean-Marc Espalioux, Paul-Louis Girardot, Georges Rallisix members of the board of directors.  In addition, a new member was elected during this meeting. Their terms will now be subject to renewal based on seniority of appointment.  Accordingly, the terms of seven members will expire at the end of the shareholders’ general meeting called to approve the financial statements for the 2008 fiscal year, and Murray Stuartthe terms of the remaining seven members of the board of directors will expire at the end of the general shareholders’ meeting called to approve the financial statements for six years, and appointed Mr. Jean-Francois Dehecq to a six-year term as a replacement for Mr. Jacques Espinasse.the 2011 fiscal year.  

Evaluation of the Independenceindependence of Directorsdirectors

To qualify as “independent” under ourthe board of directors’ charter, a director must not have any relations with our company, ourits subsidiaries or ourits management that couldmight impair his or her objective judgment.  OurThe board of directors’ charter sets forth in detail the independence criteria that each director must satisfy, which are based on the recommendations of the Bouton report discussed above.

The board of a French blue ribbon panel chaired by Mr. Daniel Bouton for the improvement of corporate governance in French public companies.

Nevertheless, ourdirectors’ charter also providesdoes, however, provide a certain measure of flexibility in applyingwith respect to the application of these independence criteria, since ourcriteria: the board of directors may, for example, deem that one of its members is independent in light of the specific facts and circumstances of that member, his share ownership or any other reason, even if that member fails to meet all of the independence criteria set forth in the charter.  Conversely, ourcharter; conversely, the board of directors may deemconsider that one of its members should not to be declared independent even though he otherwise meets allthe charter's independence criteria.

The board of the independence criteria set forth in our charter.

Ourdirectors’ charter also provides that the board must annually evaluate on an annual basis and prior to publication of the Company’s reference document, the independence of each of its members prior to publication of our Frenchdocument de référence.members.  This evaluation must take into account the independence rules set forth in ourits charter, the particular facts and circumstances involved and the conclusions of ourprovided by the Company’s nominations and compensation committee.



100



Back to Contents


After receiving the conclusions of the nominations and compensation committee, our board of directors proceeded with its annual evaluation of the independence of its members on March 29, 2005.2007.  At this meeting, the board of directors qualified as independent of Messrs. Jean Azema, DanielAzéma, Bouton, Jean-MarcDehecq, Espalioux, Philippe Kourilsky, Arthur Laffer, Francis Mayer, Baudouin Prot, LouisScaroni, Schweitzer and Murray Stuart as independentStuart.  The board of directors underpostponed the independence criteria set forth above andevaluation of the particular facts and circumstances involved. Regarding Messrs. Bouton and Prot in particular, they were deemed to satisfynewly appointed Mr. de Romanet de Beaune.

As for our independence criteria, despite the banking relationship what we maintainexisting relationships with Société Générale and BNP Paribas, respectively. Theof which Messrs. Daniel Bouton and Baudoin Prot are, respectively, chairman and chief executive officer and chief executive officer, the board of directors concluded so ondeemed that the basis of our company’sCompany’s solid financial situation, its independence with regard tofrom bank financing and the limited na turesignificance of the our company’sCompany’s commitments withto these banks. Conversely,banks allowed it to qualify these board members as independent within the board deemed that Mr. Georges Ralli no longer satisfied the independence criteria due to the nature of the banking relationship between our company and Banque Lazard during 2004.directors.  

On March 28, 2006, our25, 2008, upon recommendation from the nominations and compensation committee, the board of directors conducted a new evaluation of board members’the independence of its members and concluded that it would renew the following eightqualification as independent of the directors continuedabove. Additionally, it qualified as independent Mr. Ralli, due to satisfya lack of a significant missions being awarded by the board’s independence criteria: Messrs. Jean Azema, Daniel Bouton, Jean-Marc Espalioux, Arthur Laffer, Francis Mayer, Baudouin Prot, Louis SchweitzerCompany to Lazard in 2007, Mr. de Romanet de Beaune, taking into account the public interest investment role that the Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations plays in the environmental services sector in particular, and, Murray Stuart.finally, Mr. Philippe KourilskyGirardot, taking into account the time that has lapsed since he was CEO of the leading company of the water division.  However, Mr. Romanet de Beaune may be deemed not to no longer satisfybe independent under the independence criteria given his rolestandards set forth in Rule 10A-3 of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as a scientific counselor atamended.

Accordingly, our board of directors has 11 independent members as of the Veolia Environnement Institute since September 1, 2005.date of filing of this Form 20-F.

Compensation

Director compensationDirectors may takebe compensated in one of two forms: directors’ways: directors' fees paid for attending meetings of our board of directors (jetons de présence), which are set by our company’s annual shareholders’ meeting, and modified at subsequent meetings if necessary,whose allocation is determined by our board of directors pursuant to recommendations of the nominations and compensation committee, and exceptional compensation, which may be awarded by the board of directors under conditions set by law.

At its meeting of March 29, 2005, our board of directors followed the recommendation of the nominations and compensation committee and decided that the total amount of directors'The €770,000 budget for directors’ fees for the 2005 fiscal year would be maintained at the same level as in 2003 and 2004. However, the board of directors decided to modify the allocation of fees in order to take into account the individual workload and responsibilities of each board member, as well as the change in composition of the board committees.  At its meeting of March 28, 2006, the board of directors decided to propose toapproved by the combined general shareholders’ meeting ofon May 11, 2006, (which subsequently granted its approval) an increase in the total annual amount of fees to be paidhas not been modified. No exceptional compensation was awarded to directors from €600,000 to €770,000 (see “—Compensation—Board of Directors Compensation” below for the new allocation of fees) .in 2007.

FunctioningOperations and activity in 2007

The chairman of our board of directors organizes and supervises the work of the board, onthe substance of which he then reports to shareholders.  The chairman is also responsible for supervising ourthe Company’s corporate bodies and, in particular, ensuring that our directors are capable of fulfillingable to carry out their duties.  

Directors may participate in board deliberations through videoconference.videoconference or telecommunication.1 They are deemed present for purposes of calculating quorum and majority requirements when participating through such means, except whenwith respect to certain importantmajor decisions are made as set forth under applicable law.provided for by law (e.g., establishment of annual statutory and consolidated financial statements and preparation of the management report).  This option was used on seven occasions during board meetings in 2007.

The charter of our board of directors calls forrequires the board of directors to meet at least four times per year. During the 20052007 fiscal year, the board of directors met seven times.  eleven times, including four special meetings devoted to discussing strategic acquisitions and the launching of a capital increase in cash with preservation of shareholders’ preferential subscription rights, which was completed on July 10, 2007.

In addition,On average, board meetings last approximately two hours, which allows for a thorough examination and discussion of the items on the agenda. The average attendance level at board meetings in 2007 was 77.9%.

1 Under conditions set forth in Articles L.225-37 and R.225-21 of directors must devote at least one meeting per year to a review of our strategy.  In 2005, one such meetingthe French Commercial Code. This ability is provided for in the internal regulations of the board of directors, occurred on December 8, 2005.which allows board members to participate in board meetings by videoconference and any other manner permitted by applicable law.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 47101



Back to contentsContents


In 2007, in addition to providing legal and financial authorizations, the board of directors primarily addressed the following subjects, among others: corporate governance (evaluation of board members’ independence, chairman and chief executive officer compensation and distribution of directors’ fees, co-opting of a director, formal evaluation of the board and the management, modification of the board’s internal charter), annual and half-year financial statements, the capital increase completed in 2007, approval of significant financial and external growth transactions, evaluation of internal audit and chairman’s report, defining our Company’s policies on incentives for executives and managers of the Group (stock options, free shares), the stock option plan and granting of free shares in 2007, employee savings plans and share capital increase reserved for employees (Group Savin gs Plan), and the consolidated 2008 budget. In addition, the board of directors devoted one meeting to an in-depth review of our Group’s strategy, in the form of a presentation and analysis of the long-term plan, in which the four general managers of the divisions participated

Board Evaluation

Under itsour charter, our board of directors is required to evaluate its work and procedures each year, in order to improveannually, with the goal of improving its efficiency, verifyverifying that important matters are adequately prepared and discussed withinduring board meetings and to assess the board and measure the contribution ofcontributions made by each board member.

In addition, theour board’s internal charter provides that a formal evaluation of its functioningoperations must occur every three years, which may take place under the directionsupervision of an independent director and, if necessary, an outside consultant, if necessary. Thisconsultant. The purpose of this formal evaluation is meant to verify that theour board is conducting its work in accordance with its charter, and to identify ways in which functioningoperations and performance can be improved.

AThe first formal evaluation occurred during the first quarter of 2004, with the preliminary analysis being conducted under the supervision of the chairman of the nominations and compensation committee. A detailed questionnaire and individual interviews with directors served as the basis for the preliminary analysis, the results of which were presented in detail by the committee and debated at the board of directors’ meeting held on June 22, 2004.  During the same meeting, theour board of directors also evaluated the performance of our company’s management based on the basis of the nominations and compensation committee’s report. The functioningoperations of the board of directors, its committees and our company’s executive management was considered to be satisfactory as a wholeover all by our directors.  

At its meeting of March 15, 2005,However, certain areas were targeted for improvement.  These areas included developing more information and exchanges about our group’s operating activities, obtaining additional information related to competition, human resources policies and research and development, and increasing the frequency information is provided concerning cash flows, off-balance sheet commitments and risk management. The board of directors appointedconsidered the possibility of reinforcing the accounts and audit committee.  This measure was implemented beginning on April 1, 2005 by the appointment of an additional member ofto the accounts and audit committee (with effect from April 1, 2005), and replacedthe replacement of a member of the nominations and compensation committee.  

FollowingIn 2005, at its meeting of March 29, the recommendationboard of directors reserved part of its agenda to a discussion of the progress of its operations, in particular the need to address requests for improved content and increased frequency of information reporting to directors. To this end, management begun to provide the board with important information immediately, including with detailed descriptions of our group’s activities, market trends and other initiatives on a semi-annual basis.

In 2006, at its meeting of December 12, the board of directors reserved part of its agenda to reviewing and discussing its functioning. It appears that its operations have clearly improved since the first formal evaluation that was conducted in 2004.  However, the directors did express the need for more time to consider certain specific subjects (strategy, major acquisitions) in order to have a clearer understanding of subjects to be considered during board meetings and, if needed, to prepare questions. They also suggested that a meeting and discussion regarding our company’s strategy should take place at least once a year, when the need arises with the directors of our group’s divisions, and that more time should be dedicated to this subject. Finally, the directors requested annual or biannual presentations relating to competition and an improvement in the presentation of our company 46;s financial information (liquidity, group debt and capital resources) compared to with the same information or financial aggregates of by similar groups.  



102



Back to Contents


In accordance with the provisions of the board’s internal charter, a new formal evaluation of the board of directors took place in 2007, as well as an evaluation of the performance of the chairman and the action of our company’s management. This study, conducted under the supervision of the chairman of the nominations and compensation committee, involved the review of a detailed questionnaire completed by directors, the results of which were analyzed and presented at the board of directors will devote partdirectors’ meeting of its agendaDecember 19, 2007. The directors’ responses once again confirmed that the board’s operations had in 2006general improved, in particular due to a review and debate over its functioning, in anticipationthe implementation of the nextmeasures agreed on following the formal evaluation in 2004. The directors recommended that will take place during 2007.the board’s composition be reexamined in order to achieve a better distribution of seats between financial, industrial and entrepreneurial members and female members. The directors also requested improved information about the implementation of certain board decisions or developments in projects presented to it.  They also requested an increased focus on mid- and long-term planning as well as strategy.  They further recommended that the scope of missions of the board committees be reviewed periodically and that the committees also perform their own evaluation of their operations. The creation of the strategic research, innovation and sustainable development committee was considered by the directors to be essential. Finally, the directors expressed their desire to have more interaction with non-executive managers and to receive frequent updates on our liquidity and debt, as well as information relating to significant changes in our company’s shareholding.

Information Available to Directors

The chairman supplies directors with information on a timely information allowingbasis in order to allow them to fully exercise their duties, and communicatestransmits to directors in a continuous manneron an ongoing basis all significant information concerning our company. Each director may request and receive any information necessary to carry outneeded for the exercise of his duties,or her, and may receive additional training concerningrelating to our group and its activities if he or she so desires.  

As requested by the members of our board of directors, management aims to deliver documents to be reviewed in board meetings to directors in a timely manner and provide without delay any material information relating to our group, as well as communicate between board meetings.

In 2005,2007, the board of directors was periodically informed of our company’s financial situation, cash flows and off-balance sheet commitments primarily through the reports byof the accounts and audit committee.  TheIn addition, the board of directors pre-approved all material financing transactions in accordance with its charter.

In order to perform their duties, directors may also meet with our company’s principal executive officers upon prior notice to the chairman of the board of directors. As a result, our group’s senior executive vice-president and general secretary regularly participatesparticipate in board meetings. In addition, at the requestheads of the chairman or a director, an executive officer may bedivisions are periodically invited to attend board meetings to give presentations relating to their areas of activity.  In 2007, a board meeting was specifically dedicated to the presentation and discussion of the boardmajor elements of directors.our strategic plan, and the presentations by each of the heads of our Group’s divisions relating to the issues, priorities and perspectives, and strategic growth areas of their respective divisions.

Duties of Directors

The charter of the board of directors provides that each of our directors is bound by a number of duties and obligations, such asas: (i) a duty to act in the corporate interest of our company;company, (ii) an obligation to inform the board of directors of any existing or potential conflict of interest and to abstainrefrain from voting in any situation where such a conflict of interest exists, as well as(iii) a duty of professional secrecy, and (iv) an obligation to comply with our company’s insider trading policy.  More specifically, directors must inform the chairman of the board of any agreement entered into by our company or on ourits behalf in which hesuch director has any direct or indirect interest;interest

Each director receives a duty“Director’s Guide” containing the following documents: our company’s articles of professional secrecy;association, the list of the powers of the chairman and an obligationchief executive officer, the charter of the board of directors, the charters of the accounts and audit committee and the nominations and compensation committee, the rules to be followed by directors for reporting trades in our company’s shares, and a copy of our company’s ethics program entitled “Ethics, Commitment and Responsibility”.  As requested by the directors, the “Director’s Guide” is updated periodically.

With respect to insider trading, directors must report trades in our company’s shares to the AMF and to Veolia Environnement, and must generally comply with the provisions of article L.621-18-2 of the French Monetary and Financial Code(Code monétaire et financier).  The procedures and conditions of this reporting requirement are included in our company’s insidercode of conduct regarding trading policy.in shares.



103



Back to Contents


Powers of the Board of Directors

Under French law, and our articles of association, ourthe board of directors has broad powers to act on behalf of our company within ourin a manner that is consistent with its corporate purposes and to define and implement the orientation of our company’s policies,activities, subject to those powers expressly granted to our shareholder by law or our company’s articles of associationassociations. The board of directors can address any issue relating to our shareholders.  company’s affairs.

In addition to the powers of the board of directors’ charter provides that certain significant decisions made by ourdirectors under applicable law, company rules require the chief executive officer must be pre-approved byto obtain prior board approval for certain significant decisions.  These limitations are described in greater detail below in the board of directors.  Decisions of our chief executive officer on any of the following matters are subject to such prior authorization: (i) strategic orientation of our group, (ii) transactions in line with our strategy in excess of €300 million per transaction or, if these transactions are not part of our budget, in excess of €150 million, unless they consist of financing transactions, (iii) transactions not in line with our strategy in excess of €100 million per transaction, unless they consist of financing transactions, (iv) financing transactions (whatever their terms) representing an amount in excess of €1.5 billion per transaction, and (v) transactions involving our shares representing an amount in excess of 1% of our total outstanding shares.

Pursuant to the board of directors’ charter, in 2005 decisionsparagraphs relating to the strategic orientation of our group, major financing transactions (bank refinancing and delivery of guarantees) as well as the negotiation and renegotiation of agreements with a strategic nature were subject to the prior approval of the board.management.

Board Members

The following table sets forth the names and ages of the current members of our board of directors, the date of their first appointment, or renewal, as the case may be, to the board and the date of expiration of their current term their current function within our company and their current principal business activities conducted outside of our company. All positions and offices of our directors indicated below are given as of January 31, 2006, unless2008. Unless otherwise indicated.stated, all terms of office shall expire at the general shareholders’ meeting for the year stated.  Directors may be contacted at our headquarters, located at 36/38 avenue Kléber, 75116 Paris.


Henri Proglio

Age 5658

Date of first appointment:
4/30/2003

Expiration of term:
2009


Principal Function within our Company:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

N/ANone.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 48



Back to contents





Jean Azéma*

Age 5355

Date of first appointment:
4/30/2003

Expiration of term:
2009

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Accounts and Audit Committee sinceApril 30, 2003

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive Officer of Groupama SA




104



Back to Contents



Daniel Bouton*

Age 5658

Date of first appointment:
4/30/2003

Expiration of term:
2012

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Nominations and Compensation Committee since April 1, 2005

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officerchief executive officer of Société Générale

Jean- François Dehecq(1)Dehecq*

Age 6668

Date of first appointment:
5/11/2006

Expiration of term:
2012

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Sanofi-Aventis

Jean-Marc Espalioux*Augustin de Romanet de Beaune*

Age 5447

Date of first appointment:
4/30/20033/29/2007

Expiration of term:
2012

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Accounts and Audit Committee since April 30, 2003

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

N/A



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 49



Back to contents





Paul-Louis Girardot

Age 72

Date of first appointment: 4/30/2003

Expiration of term:
2012

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Accounts and Audit Committee since April 1, 2005

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Veolia Eau -- Compagnie Générale des Eaux

Philippe Kourilsky

Age 63

Date of first appointment: 4/30/2003

Expiration of term:
2009

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Professor at the Collège de France.

Arthur Laffer*

Age 65

Date of first appointment: 4/30/2003

Expiration of term:
2009

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Laffer Associates and Laffer Investments

Francis Mayer*

Age 55

Date of first appointment: 4/30/2003

Expiration of term:
2009

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive Officer of Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 50105



Back to contentsContents





Serge MichelJean-Marc Espalioux*

Age 7956

Date of first appointment:
4/30/2003

Renewal of term :5/11/2006

Expiration of term:
2012

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Accounts and Audit Committee since April 30, 2003

Member of the strategic research, innovation and sustainable development committee since September 14, 2006

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman and chief executive officer of Financière Agache Private Equity

Paul-Louis Girardot*

Age 74

Date of first appointment: 4/30/2003

Renewal of term :5/11/2006

Expiration of term:
2012

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Accounts and Audit Committee since April 1, 2005

Member of the strategic research, innovation and sustainable development committee since September 14, 2006

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Veolia Eau – Compagnie Générale des Eaux




106



Back to Contents



Philippe Kourilsky

Age 65

Date of first appointment: 4/30/2003

Expiration of term:
2009

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Chairman of the strategic research, innovation and sustainable development committee since September 14, 2006

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Professor at the Collège de France.

Serge Michel

Age 81

Date of first appointment: 4/30/2003

Renewal of term:
5/11/2006

Expiration of term:
2012

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

ChairmanPresident of the Nominations and Compensation Committee since April 30, 200330,2003

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman of Soficot SAS

BaudouinBaudoin Prot*

Age 5456

Date of first appointment: 4/30/2003

Expiration of term:
2009

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Director and Chief Executive Officer of BNP Paribas




107



Back to Contents



Georges RalliRalli*

Age 5759

Date of first appointment: 4/30/2003

Renewal of term:
5/11/2006

Expiration of term:
2012

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive of European Investment Banking Business of Lazard Group LLC (USA)

Chief executive officer Vice President and Managing Partner of Lazard Frères SAS

Paolo Scaroni*

Age 61

Date of first appointment: 12/12/2006

Expiration of term:
2009

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of ENI (Italy)

Louis Schweitzer*

Age 6365

Date of first appointment: 4/30/2003

Expiration of term:
2009

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Nominations and Compensation Committee since April 30, 2003

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman of the Board of Directors of Renault




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 51108



Back to contentsContents





Murray Stuart*

Age 7274

Date of first appointment: 4/30/2003

Renewal of term:
5/11/2006

Expiration of term:
2012

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Chairman of the Accounts and Audit Committee since April 30, 2003

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

N/ANone


*

Independent directors.

(1)

Replaced Jacques Espinasse as a director as of the end of the shareholders’ meeting of May 11, 2006.



Henri ProglioPROGLIO is a graduate of the HEC business school in Paris. He joined Compagnie Générale des Eaux in 1972 and was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of CGEA in 1990. He was appointed Executive Vice President of Vivendi Universal and PresidentChairman and Chief Executive Officer of Vivendi Water in 1999. He became Chairman of theVeolia Environnement’s Management Board of our company in 2000 and Chairman of theits Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer in April 2003.  He is also a Director of Thales, Member of the supervisory board of Elior, Director of EDF, Director of Casino, Guichard-Perrachon, Member of the supervisory board of Lagardère, Member of the supervisory board of CNP Assurances, Observer on the supervisory board of Caisse Nationale des Caisses d’Epargne, Managing Director (gérant) of Veolia Eau – Compagnie Générale des Eaux, Chairma n of the board of directors of Veolia Propreté, Chairman of the board of Veolia Transport,  Member of the supervisory boards A and B of Dalkia, Chairman of the board of directors of Veolia Water, Chairman of the supervisory board of Dalkia France, Director of SARP, Director of SARP Industries, Director of Dalkia International, Director of Société des Eaux de Marseille, President of Campus Veolia Environnement, Director of Collex, Director of Veolia Transport Australia, Director of Veolia Environmental Services Plc, Director of Siram, Director of Veolia Environmental Services Asia, Director of Veolia Transport Northern Europe and Director of Veolia Environmental Services North America Corp.

Jean AzemaAZEMAholds an engineering degree from the Ecole Supérieure d’Agriculture de Purpan (ESAP) as well as a degree from the Centre National d’Etudes Supérieures de Sécurité Sociale (CNESS).  He began his career at Caisse Régionalel’Union Départementale de la Mutualité Agricole des Pyrénées Orientales in 1975, then at the Centre National d’Etudes Supérieures de la Sécurité Sociale from 19751978 to 1978,1979, and later worked at Caisse Régionalewith the Unité Départementale de l’Allierla Mutualité Agricole of Allier from 1979 to 1987.  From 1987 to 1995, Mr. AzemaAzéma served as financial director of Groupama Vie, director of investments of Groupama, director of account management and consolidation at Caisse Centrale des Assurances Mutuelles Agricoles (CCAMA) and director of insurance at CCAMA.  In 1996, he was appointed Chief Executive Officer of GroupamaGr oupama Southwest and, in 1998, of Groupama South.Sud.  In June 2000, Mr. AzemaJean Azéma was appointed Chief Executive Officerchief executive officer of CCAMA.Groupama.  He was electedis currently the Chairman of the French Federation of Mutual Insurance Companies (Fédération Fra nçaise des Sociétés d’Assurance Mutuelle) in December 2001.  He has been the Chief Executive Officerchief executive officer of Groupama SA and of the Fédération Nationale Groupama, since June 2000.  Mr. Azema is also chief executive officer of Groupama Holding and Groupama Holding 2, Director of Société Générale, Director of the ACMA association, permanent representative of Groupama SA on the board of directors of Bolloré Investissement, Chairmanpresident of the Fédération Française des Sociétés d’Assurance Mutuelle (FFSAM), Vice ChairmanMutuelles and vice-president of the Fédération Françaiseaises des Sociétés d’Assurance and Director of Mediobanca.d’Assurance.


Daniel BoutonBOUTON holds a degree in political science and is a graduate of the Ecole Nationale d'Administration (ENA). As part of the French financial controllers’ civil service corps, he occupied a number of different positions in the French Ministry of Economy, Finance and Industry, including that of Budget Director, between 1988 and 1991. Since 1991, he has worked at Société Générale, serving as Managing Director from 1993 to 1997, and as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from 1997 to the present. He2008.  Mr. Bouton is also Directorcurrently Chairman and chief executive officer of Total SA and Director of Schneider Electric SA.Société Générale.

Jean-François DehecqDEHECQ has a degreegraduated from the Ecole Nationale des Arts et Métiers. After having been mathematics professor from 1964 to 1965 at the Lycée catholique Saint-Vincent de Senlis, he became a scientific research intern in the nuclear propulsion department of the army. In 1965 he joined the Société Nationale des Pétroles d’Aquitaine (SNPA, ex Elf Aquitaine). After four years working for the economics department (1965 to 1969), he became executive assistant (1969 to 1970), and then operations engineer (1970 to 1971) at the Plant in Lacq, a major site for gas supply in France. In 1973, he became chief executive officer of Sanofi, an important part of Elf Aquitaine. From 1982 to 1988, he was vice-president and chief executive officer of Sanofi before taking charge in February 1988. In 1999, he became chairman and chief executive officer of Sanofi Synthel abo. In 2004, he organized the merger of Sanofi-Aventis. Mr. Jean-François Dehecq is currently chairman of the board of directors of Sanofi-Aventis.



109



Back to Contents


Augustin DE ROMANET DE BEAUNE holds a diploma from the Institut d’Etudes Politiques (IEP) in Paris and the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA).  He began his career as a mathematics professorbudget director within the Ministry of Economics and then servedFinance.  In 1990, he was finance attaché within the French permanent mission to the European Community in Brussels, before returning to the Armybudget department as chief of the budgetary analysis and politics bureau in 1993.  In 1995, he became a research scientist attechnical advisor within the Nuclear Propulsion Department. From 1965 until 1973, he served in a varietyMinistry of positions at Société Nationale des Pétroles d’Aquitaine (SNPA) before joining Sanofi (now known as Sanofi-Aventis) as Managing Director in 1973. From 1982 to 1988, Mr. DehecqEconomics and Finance and technical consultant, followed by chief of staff of the budget secretary.  After having served as Vice Presidentbudgetary consultant to the deputy minister of budgets, government spokesperson and Managing Directormission head within the Ministry of Sanofi, before being appointed ChairmanEconomics and Chief Executive OfficerFinance between 1995 and 1997, he became deputy director reporting to the budget director, then deputy director in charge of Sanofi in 1988. From 1998the transportation sector reporting to the budget director.  In 1999 he also served as Managing Director of Health for the Elf Aquitaine group. Following the merger of Sanofi with Synthélabo in 1999,and 2000, he was appointed as Chairmannamed director of Oddo et Compagnie and Chief Executive Officer.managing partner of Oddo Pinatton Corporate.  In June 2004,2002, he was reappointed as Chairmanchief of staff to the deputy budget minister and Chief Executive Officerassistant chief of Sanofi. Asstaff of December 31,the Minister of Economy, Finance and Industry.  From 2004 to 2005, he was also a Directorchief of Air France, Financestaff of the Minister of Employment, Work and Social Cohesion and assistant chief of staff to the Prime Minister and assistant secretary general for the President of the Republic.  After having served as assistant director of finance and strategy and as member of the executive committee of Groupe Crédit Agricole since October 2006, he was named chief executive officer of the Caisse des Dépôts et Management, Société Financière des Laboratoires de Cosmétologie Yves Rocher and Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Member of Supervisory Board of Agence de l’Innovation Industrielle, Chairman of Association Nationale de la Recherche Technique, Member of Fondation Française pour la Recherche sur l’Epilepsie, Vice Chairman of EFPIA (European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations) and Member of IFPMA (International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Associations).Consignations on March 7, 2007.

Jean-Marc EspaliouxESPALIOUX holds degrees in political science, law and economics, is an alumnus of ENA and served in the French financial controllers’ civil service corps from 1978 to 1983. In 1984, he joined Compagnie Générale des Eaux, where he served as Chief Financial Officer from 1987 to 1996 and as Deputy Managing Director from 1996 to 1997. Having been a director of Accor from 1987 to 1996, he served as Chairman of the Management Board of Accor from 1997 to 2006. He is also DirectorSince July 2006, he has been chairman and chief executive officer of Air France–KLM and Deputy on the supervisory board of Caisse Nationale des Caisses d’Épargne.Financière Agache Private Equity.

Paul-Louis GirardotGIRARDOTwas a Director and the Chief Executive Officer of Vivendi Universal until 1998. His area of focus is the development of delegations activities for the Veolia Environnement Group, particularly in our water division.  While there,at Vivendi, he contributed greatly to the development of its activities in the area of telephonic communication, in particular radio-telephone. Currently, his work is principally focused on developing our outsourcing business in our water division.radiotelephone. He has also assisted in ourVeolia Environnement Group’s development in the area of energy services and the production of decentralized electricity (co-generation), through Dalkia. He has been serving as the Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Veolia Eau -- CompagnieEau-Compagnie Générale des Eaux since 2001.  He is also Chairman of the supervisory board of Compagnie des Eaux de Paris, Member of the supervisory board of Dalkia France, Member of supervisory boards A and B of Dalkia, Director of Veolia Transport, Director of Veolia Propreté, Director of Veolia Water, Director of Société des Eaux de Marseille and Member of the supervisory board of Compagnie des Eaux et de l’Ozone.  

Philippe KourilskyKOURILSKYis a graduate of the École Polytechnique in France.France and has a PhD in science. He joined the Institut Pasteur in 1972. He is currently a professor at the Collège de France. He is also Member of the board of directors of l'Ecole Polytechnique, Member of the board of directors of Collège International de Philosophie and Member of the board of directors of LEEM Recherche.

Arthur Laffer,PhDholds degrees in economics from Yale and Stanford Universities. He began his career at H.C. Wainwright & Company in the 1960s, then joined the University of Chicago as a professor in economic affairs from 1967 to 1976.  He was then appointed as the Charles B. Thornton professor in economic affairs at the University of Southern California from 1976 to 1984. Later, he was a Distinguished University Professor at Pepperdine University and a member of its board until 1988. He has been Economic Director of the Federal Office of Management and Budget (1970), special advisor to the Secretary of the Treasury and to the Secretary of Defense (1972-1977) and a member of the Presidential Council of Economic Advisors (1981 to 1989). He was also one of the 25 founding members of the Consultative Council to the U.S. Congress, which was formed in 1998 to provide a dvice to the 105th and 106th congresses in the area of tax and economics. In 1979, he founded Laffer Associates, an economic research and consulting firm, of which he is currently the chairman and chief executive officer.  He is also the founder, chairman and chief executive officer of Laffer Investments. He is a founding member of the Policy Consultative Committee of the U.S. Congress, Member of the Council of Economic Advisors of Governor Schwartzenegger and Member of the board of directors or consultative councils of Oxigene Inc., Nicholas-Applegate Growth Equity Fund, Provide Commerce, MPS Group and William Lyon Homes.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 52



Back to contents


Francis Mayer is a graduate of ENA and a tenured university professor.  He joined the French Finance Ministry in 1979 where, after holding several positions, he became Deputy Director in 1994.  In October 1997, Mr. Mayer was appointed President of the Paris Club, and in October 1999 Vice President of the European Investment Bank.  Mr. Mayer has been the Chief Executive Officer of the Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations (CDC) since December 2002.  He is also a Permanent representative on the supervisory board of CNP Assurances, Vice-chairman of the supervisory board of Ixis Corporate & Investment Bank, Member of the supervisory board and vice-president of Caisse Nationale des Caisses d'Epargne, Chairman of the supervisory board of Société Nationale Immobilière, Chairman of the supervisory board of CDC Entreprises, Director of CDC Holding Fina nce, Chairman of the supervisory board of Société Nationale Immobilière, Director of Accor, Director of Casino and Director of Dexia.

Serge MichelMICHELhas spent his entire career in the construction and public works business, having served as Vice President of Compagnie de Saint Gobain, Deputy Managing Director and President of SOCEA, Chairman of S.G.E. until 1991, Chairman of CISE until 1997 and Deputy Managing Director of Compagnie Générale des Eaux (which became Vivendi Universal) until 1992. He is currently Chairman of Soficot, which he founded in 1997. He is also Chairman of CIAM Domaine de Pin Fourcat, Chairman of SAS Carré des Champs-élysées, Chairman of Société Gastronomique de l’étoile, Chairman of Groupe Epicure, Member of the supervisory board of Compagnie des Eaux de Paris, Permanent representative of SARP on the board of directors of SARP Industries, Permanent representative of EDRIF on the supervisory board of Veolia Eau -- Compagnie Générale des Eaux, Mem ber of the supervisory board of Société des Eaux de Trouville Deauville et Normandie, Permanent representative of CEPH on the board of directors of SEDIBEX, Chairman of the supervisory board of SEGEX and Director of Vinci, Eiffage, LCC and Infonet Services.

Baudouin ProtBaudoin PROTis a graduate of the HEC business school in Paris and ENA.  From 1974 to 1983, Mr. Prot was successively the Deputy Prefect of the Franche-Comté region of France, French General Inspector of Finance, and the Deputy Director of Energy and Raw Materials of the Ministry of Industry.  He joined Banque Nationale de Paris (BNP) in 1983, where he served in various positions before becoming Executive Vice President in 1992 and Chief Executive Officer in 1996. After having been a director and executive vice president of BNP Paribas since March 2000, he was named a director and chief executive officer of BNP Paribas in June 2003.  He is also Director of Pinault-Printemps-Redoute, Permanent representative of BNP Paribas on the supervisory board of Accor, Member of the board of directors of Pargesa Holding SA (Switzerland) and Director of ERBE (Belgium).


Georges RalliRALLI holds degrees in banking and finance, political science (from the Paris Institute of Political Science (IEP)) and business.business from the Institut Commercial de Nancy. He began his banking career at Crédit Lyonnais (1970-1981) and later headed the department of financial negotiations at Crédit du Nord. In 1982, he served as Secretary of the Commission for the Development and Protection of Savings. In 1986, Mr. Ralli joined Lazard, becoming a managing partner in 1993 and then co-head of mergers and acquisitions at Lazard LLC in 1999.  Since 2000, Mr. Ralli has been deputy chairman and a member of the executive committee of Lazard LLC (U.S.) and an executive vice president of Lazard Frères (Paris).  He isSince 2006, he has been Chief Executive of the European Investment Banking Committee of the Lazard Group LLC.



110



Back to Contents


Paolo SCARONI holds a degree in economics from Bocconi University in Milan and has an MBA from Columbia Business School (New York). After having spent a year with McKinsey & Company following his MBA, he held various positions between 1973 and 1985 with Saint Gobain where he became chairman of the “flat glass” department. In 1985, Mr. Scaroni became chief executive officer of Techint, while also Executivebeing vice-chairman of Falck and executive vice president of SIV, a joint venture between Techint and managing partnerPilkington plc.  He became chief executive officer of Maison Lazard SAS, Chairman and managing partnerPilkington plc in 1996 until May 2002. Following being chief executive officer of Lazard Frères Gestion SAS, Chairman-Chief Executive Officer and directorEnel from 2002 to 2005, he became chief executive officer of Lazard Fr 32;res Banque, Director of Fonds Partenaires Gestion, Director of VLGI, Director of Chargeurs and Silic, deputy of Eurazeo, Deputy Chairman of Lazard Group LLC (USA), Member of the executive committee of Lazard Strategic Coordination Company LLC (USA), Member of the board of directors of Lazard & Co. (Italy) and Co-chairman of the Comité Européen d’Investissement Bancaire.Eni in June 2005, a position he still currently holds.   

Louis SchweitzerSCHWEITZER isa graduate of the Institut d’Etudes Politiques de Paris and ENA.  He has served as Inspector of Finances and, from 1981 to 1986, as Chief of Staff of Mr. Laurent Fabius, who over the same period was Deputy Minister of Budget, Minister of Industry and Research and Prime Minister of France.  In 1986, Mr. Schweitzer joined Renault’s senior management as Director, and later served as Director of Planning and Management Control, Chief Financial Officer (in 1989) and Executive Vice President.  He became Chief Executive Officer of Renault in 1990 and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in May 1992. He served in this position until April 29, 2005, at which point his sole function within Renault became Chairman of the Board of Directors. He is also Chairman of the Haute Autorité de Lutte contre les Discriminations et pour l’Egalité ;, Director of Électricité de France, Director of BNP Paribas, Director of l’Oréal, Member of the consultative board of Banque de France, Member of the board of various public interest associations (Musée du Louvre, Musée du Quai Branly and Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques), Vice-chairman of the supervisory board of Philips (Netherlands), Director of AB Volvo (Sweden), Chairman of the Board of Directors of Astra Zeneca (United Kingdom) and Member of the consultative board of Allianz (Germany).

Murray StuartSTUART holds degrees in literature and law from the University of Glasgow, and is also trained as an accountant. He has pursued a career in industry, commerce and financial services. Mr. Stuart has worked for International Computers Plc (as Chief Financial Officer and Deputy Director), Metal Box plc and Carnaud Metalbox, a packaging manufacturer, (as Vice-President) and Scottish Power Plc (as President from 1992 to 2000). Until May 2002, he also served as Executive Vice President of the Audit Commission for Public Services in the UK, as President of Trust Hammersmith Hospitals NHS, an important public health education and research center in London, and as a director of Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc.   

Management

Our board of directors directs the manner in which we are managed in accordance with our articles of association.  In particular, our board of directors appoints a chief executive officer to manage our business on a day-to-day basis.  The chairman of our board of directors may serve, if appointed by the board of directors, as chief executive officer.  On April 30, 2003, our board of directors appointed its chairman, Mr. Henri Proglio, to act as our chief executive officer.  The chief executive officer has broad powers to act on our behalf, including the power to represent us in dealings with third parties, within the limits of our corporate purpose and the powers expressly reserved to our shareholders and our board of directors.directors under applicable law.

Following the change of our corporate formreorganization on April 30, 2003, and in application of our governance principles, our chairman and chief executive officer created an executive committee composed of seveneight members drawn from each of our four operating divisions (all of whom, with the exception of Mr. Eric Marie de Ficquelmont, were members of our former management board until April 30, 2003).divisions.  Our executive committee meets approximately every fifteen days, and is chaired by Mr. Henri Proglio.  The executive committee helps to determine our principal strategy.strategic orientation.

The following table sets forth the names and ages of the members of our executive committee, their current function in our company and their principal business activities outside of our company.



111



Back to Contents



Name

Age

Function in Veolia Environnement

Principal Business
Activities Outside
Veolia Environnement

————

————

————

————

Henri Proglio

5658

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

None

Jérôme Contamine

4850

Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

None

Eric Marie de Ficquelmont

51

Executive Vice President – Human Resources

None

Olivier Barbaroux

5052

Executive Vice President, HeadChairman of Energy Services DivisionVeolia Energie

None

Antoine Frérot

4749

Executive Vice President, Head of Water DivisionVeolia Eau- Compagnie Générale des Eaux

None

Denis Gasquet

5254

Executive Vice President, Head of Waste Management DivisionVeolia Propreté

None

Stéphane RichardCyrille du Peloux

4454

Executive Vice President, Head of Transportation DivisionVeolia Transport

None

Véronique Rouzaud

49

Senior Vice President, Human Resources

None

Alain Tchernonog

64

General Secretary

None


Jérôme Contamineholds degrees from the Ecole Polytechnique, the Ecole Nationale de la Statistique et de l’Administration Economique and ENA. He served as auditor for the Cour des Comptes from 1984 to 1988 and held a variety of senior positions with Elf (and later TotalFinaElf) between 1988 and 2000. He became Chief Financial Officer and Deputy Managing Director of our company in June 2000. Mr. Contamine holds various positions within our group, the most significant being managing director of Veolia Environnement UK Ltd, director of Veolia Transport, Veolia Propreté, VEVeolia Environnement Services-Ré, Veolia UK Ltd, Veolia Environmental Services UK Plc, Veolia ES HoldingsEnvironnement Europe Services and Veolia Environnement North America Company,PPP Finance, member of the supervisory board of Dalkia France and Veolia Eau-Compagnie Générale des Eaux and chairman of Veolia Environnement North America Operations. &nbs p;Outside our group, Mr. Contamine is a director of Rhodia and Valeo.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 53



Back to contents


Eric Marie de Ficquelmontjoined our group in 1991 as Head of Human Resources of CGEA Onyx. He was appointed Executive Vice President, Human Resources of our company in 2000.  Mr. de Ficquelmont holds various positions within our group, the most significant being director of Veolia Transport and Veolia Environnement Development Centre Ltd.

Olivier Barbarouxis a graduate of the Ecole Polytechnique, the Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.  He began his career in 1979 as head of the International Investments Bureau at the French Ministry of Industry. He was appointed to the Port Authority of Marseilles-Fos in 1981, first as Director of New Construction and Ship Repair and then as Director of Marseilles Terminals and Facilities in 1983.  He joined the Paribas Group in 1987 as Deputy Director of Industrial Affairs, and in 1993 was appointed as a member of the Executive Committee of Paribas Affaires Industrielles, in charge of Energy, Natural Resources and Transportation, and as Chairman and CEO of Coparex International (listed). In 1996, he was appointed Chairman and CEO of VIA GTI (listed). He became global Head of the Energy Division at Paribas in 1998 . He joined our company in 1999 as Chief Operating Officer of Vivendi Water.  He was appointed PresidentChairman of Dalkia in February 2003. Mr. Barbaroux holds various positions within our group, the most significant being permanent representative of Dalkia on the board of Clemessy, member of the supervisory boards of Compagnie des Eaux et de l’Ozone and Compagnie des Eaux de Paris, chairman and chief executive officer of Dalkia International, managing director (gérant) of Dalkia France, permanent representative of Dalkia on the board of directors of Clemessy and director of Veolia Propreté., SARP and Sade CGTH.

Antoine Frérotis a graduate of the Ecole Polytechnique and holds a doctorate from the Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées. He began his career as an engineer and joined Cergrene, a research center, in 1983, becoming a Director in 1984.  He joined Compagnie Générale des Eaux in 1990, and was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Transport in 1995.  Mr. Frérot holds various positions within our group, the most significant being chief executive officer of Veolia Eau-Compagnie Générale des Eaux, director of Veolia Transport, Veolia Propreté, SARP and Sade andCGTH, permanent representative of Veolia Eau-Compagnie Générale des Eaux on the board of directors of Société des Eaux de Marseilles,Marseille, chairman of the supervisory board of Compagnie des Eaux et de l’Ozone chief executive officer of Veolia Eau -- Compagnie Générale des Eaux, and chairman of the board of Veolia Water Solutions &&am p; Technologies.



112



Back to Contents


Denis Gasquetis a graduate of the Ecole Polytechnique and the Centre de Perfectionnement aux Affaires. From 1979 to 1989, he served in a variety of positions in the Office National des Forets.Forêts. He joined Compagnie Générale des Eaux in 1989, becoming Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Propreté in 1996. Mr. Gasquet holds various positions within our group, the most significant being member of the supervisory board of Veolia Eau-Compagnie Générale des Eaux, director of Veolia Environmental Services UK Plc, SARP and SARP Industries, andchairman of the board of directors of Veolia Environmental Services North America Corp. and Veolia Environmental Services Australia Pty Ltd.      

Cyrille du Pelouxis a graduate oftheEcole Polytechnique and the Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées (civil engineering). He began his career in the energy department of France’s Ministry of Industry in 1979.  In 1985 he joined the Bouygues group where he served as head of the diversification department and then as deputy chief executive officer of the TF1 television channel in charge of the management and development of the subsidiaries. In 1992 he became chairman and chief executive officer of Lyonnaise Communication, in charge of Noos and of the Paris Première and TPS channels. Mr. du Peloux was chief executive officer of Bull from 1999 to 2002, when he joined the Veolia Environnement Group as chief executive officer of Veolia Propreté for the UK and Northern Europe. He was then appointed chief executive officer of Veolia Transp ort on May 31, 2007. Mr. du Peloux holds various positions within our group, the most significant being director of Veolia Propreté, Veolia Environnement North America Operations and Veolia Environnement UK Plc and member of the supervisory board of SNCM.

Véronique Rouzaudholds a Master’s degree in law from the Université de Paris II – Assas and an MBA from the Institut d’Administration des Entreprises de Paris. She has occupied key positions in sales and human resources in major international business organizations, first in the Danone group, and then at Coca-Cola in Europe. She was also President of the European Works Council for the Coca-Cola Enterprises Europe Group until January 2007.  Since February 2007, she has been the Senior Vice President, Human Resources of Veolia Environnement.  Mrs. Rouzaud is also member of the board of directors of Collex Pty.      Sade CGTH, a subsidiary of Veolia Environnement.

Stéphane RichardAlain Tchernonog holds a doctorate in law. He is a graduate of the HEC business schoolInstitut d’Administration d’Entreprises andInspecteur des Finances. is admitted to the Bar. He began his career in 19911972 as a technical advisorin-house lawyer at the MinistryCentre National d’Etudes Spatiales. In 1974, he was appointed chief of Industrylegal service of the Agence Nationale de Valorisation de la Recherche (ANVAR). Alain Tchernonog was head of contracts department in Roussel-Uclaf from 1979 to 1990, and Exterior Commerce.then general counsel of Pierre Fabre group from 1990 to 1995. He joined the Compagnie Générale des Eaux in 1992 as a head of mission.  In 1994, he was named Directord’Entreprises Automobiles (which became Onyx and Chief Executive Officer of Compagnie Immobilière Phénix,Connex and thenVeolia Propreté and Veolia Transport) in 1995 he joined CGIS, which laterto manage the legal department and became Nexity, where hegeneral counsel of Veolia Environnement in 2001. He became Chairmanmember of the executive committee of our company in January 2007 and Chief Executive Officer in 1997.  Mr. Richard was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Veolia TransportGeneral Secretary in 2003.March 2007. Mr. RichardTchernonog holds various positions within our group, the most significant being chairman and chief executive officer of the board of directors of CFTI, president of CGFTE,Veolia Environnement Services-Ré, director of Veolia Transport NorthernEnvironnement Europe AB,Services, Veolia Transportation, Inc.,PPP Finance, Codeve and Veolia Transport Australia and FCC-ConnexEnvironnement North America Operations and member of the supervisory board of SNCM. Outside our group, Mr. Richard is a director of Nexity SA, UGC, France Telecom and Société des Autoroutes Paris Rhin Rhône.Dalkia France.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 54113



Back to contentsContents


COMPENSATION

Board of Directors’ Compensation

The members of our board of directors received the following compensation during the 20052006 and 2007 fiscal yearyears for services to us and our subsidiaries including benefits and directors’(directors’ fees (jetons de presence) paid for attending meetings of our boardboards of directors (jetons de présence)of our company or subsidiaries):

 

Compensation paid (in €) by
————

 

Our company

Our subsidiaries

 

————

————

Henri Proglio

1,831,612(1)

70,912

Jean Azema

45,250

0

Daniel Bouton

39,000

0

Jean-Marc Espalioux

45,250

0

Jacques Espinasse

34,000

0

Paul-Louis Girardot

45,250

49,059

Philippe Kourilsky

34,000

0

Arthur Laffer

25,500*

0

Francis Mayer

34,000

0

Serge Michel

65,000

8,213

Baudouin Prot

34,000

0

Georges Ralli

34,000

0

Louis Schweitzer

45,250

0

Murray Stuart

57,750*

0

*

After withholding tax.

(1)

This amount consists of €1,797,612 in gross compensation and €34,000 in directors’ fees.


Director

Directors’ fees paid by Veolia Environnement

(in euros)

Directors’ fees paid by Controlled Companies

(in euros)

 

2007

2006

2007

2006

Jean Azéma

25,800*

48,250

0

0

Daniel Bouton

50,000

48,250

0

0

Jean-François Dehecq

40,000

15,495

0

0

Augustin de Romanet de Beaune**

20,000

n.a.

0

n.a.

Jean-Marc Espalioux

57,500

48,250

0

0

Paul-Louis Girardot

57,500

48,250

48,155

48,535

Philippe Kourilsky

55,000

38,250

0

0

Serge Michel

80,000

76,250

11,555

10,025

Baudoin Prot

40,000

38,250

0

0

Georges Ralli

40,000

38,250

0

0

Paolo Scaroni***

24,000

0

0

0

Louis Schweitzer

50,000

48,250

0

0

Murray Stuart***

94,500

84,188

0

0

*

After withholding in application of the attendance rules adopted by the board of directors (see below).

**

Appointment by the board of directors of March 29, 2007 approved by the combined general shareholders’ meeting of May 10, 2007.

***

Net amount after tax withholdings.

n.a.: not applicable


WithIn addition to the exception of Mr. Henri Proglio,directors’ fees above, we paid €5,951 and €7,935 respectively to Messrs. Arthur Laffer and Francis Mayer for their service as directors, representing the membersremainder of the boarddirectors’ fees for the fiscal year 2006 paid at the beginning of directors did not receive any compensation in 2005 other than the fees paid in connection with their participation in board or committee meetings (jetons de presence). The figures above therefore represent such persons’ compensation for serving as directors only.2007.


Total Amount and Division of Directors’ Fees


The shareholders’ meeting of April 30, 2003 set the total annual amount of fees to be paid to our directors set at €600,000. At its€600,000 by the shareholders’ meeting ofheld on April 5, 2004,30, 2003, was not modified until 2006.  However, following the board of directors followed the recommendationrecommendations of the nominations and compensation committee, and decided that the total amount of directors' fees for the 2004 fiscal year and the allocation thereof would be maintained at the same level paid in 2003.


However, at its meeting of March 29, 2005, theour board of directors decided that although it would not propose a change in the total amount of directors’ fees for theMarch 2005 fiscal year, it wouldto modify the allocation of directors’ fees in orderfrom the fiscal year 2005 onwards.  



114



Back to take into account the appointment of an additional member to the accounts and audit committee, the replacement of a member on the nominations and compensation committee, as well as the duties incumbent upon the chairman of the accounts and audit committee in particular.  Contents


The allocation of directors' fees approvedOn May 11, 2006, following recommendations by theour board of directors, takes into account the individual workload and responsibilities of each board member and his or her participation in the work of board committees, if any.  Directors' fees for the 2005 fiscal year have been allocated as follows:


·

Total amount: €600,000

·

Person acting in role of board member only: €33,000

·

Person acting in role of board member and committee member: €43,000

·

Chairman of the nominations and compensation committee: €65,000

·

Chairman of the accounts and audit committee: €89,000


At its meeting of March 28, 2006, the board of directors decided to propose to the combined general shareholders’ meeting of May 11, 2006 an increase inincreased to €770,000 the total annual amount of fees to be paid to directors to €770,000.from fiscal year 2006.  The previous amount of €600,000 has remained unchanged since the general shareholders’ meeting of April 30, 2003. Theproposed increase (which was approved by the shareholders’ meeting of May 11, 2006) is designed to take into account the duties incumbent upon committee members (in particular those of the accounts and audit committee) and to align our group’s practices with those of other companies included in the CAC 40 that are listed in the U.S.United States.

At the sameits meeting of March 28, 2006, the board of directors decided to allocate, directors' fees for the 2006 fiscal year, €40,000 of this amount to the members of the board, €50,000 to the members of the board who are also members of a committee, €80,000 to the chairman of the nominations and compensation committee and €120,000 to the chairman of the accounts and audit committee.

The €770,000 total amount was not modified in 2007. However, at its meeting of March 29, 2007, the board of directors decided on a new distribution of directors’ fees among directors taking into account the creation of the strategic research, innovation and sustainable development committee. The board thus decided to allocate €60,000 to the chairman of the strategic research, innovation and sustainable development committee and €60,000 to the two other members of the strategic committee who are also members of the accounts and audit committee for their seat on these two committees.  Otherwise, the distribution remains unchanged. The directors’ fees for 2007 will thus be distributed as follows:

·

Person acting in role of board member only:Board member: €40,000

·

Person acting in role of boardBoard member and committee member: €50,000

·

Member of the accounts and audit committee and of the strategic research, innovation and sustainable development committee: €60,000

Chairman of the strategic research, innovation and sustainable development committee: €60,000

Chairman of the nominations and compensation committee: €80,000

·

Chairman of the accounts and audit committee: €120,000.€120,000


TheSince the 2006 fiscal year, the board of directors also decided thathas conditioned the payment of part of the amount of directors’ fees dueowed to boardeach director (whether they are committee members (whether or not members of any committee) would be subject tonot) on their attendance at meetings of the board of directors. Accordingly,directors meeting. Since 2006, the payment of half of the annual amount of directors’ fees due to be paid to an individualof a board member in 2006 (i.e.,(that is,  €20,000) will be subject to hisis conditioned on the attendance of each director at at leasta minimum of six meetings of the board per year, this amount being reduced proportionately to any absences. In 2007, amounts were withheld out of fees paid to certain directors according to the attendance rules described above based on their participation in board meetings in 2006.

At their meeting of March 25, 2008, the board of directors throughoutdecided to maintain the year. Thissame total amount will, if applicable, be reduced pro rataof directors’ fees for 2008 and to any absences recorded.


maintain the distribution division described above.

Executive Committee Compensation


In 2005, theThe aggregate amount of compensation paid to members of our executive committee in office in 2007 other than our chairman and chief executive officer, (6 persons in total) for services in all capacities was €3,933,349,€4,269,519, of which €2,393,989€2,160,041 represented the fixed portion of 20052007 compensation and €1,539,360€2,109,478 represented the variable portion of compensation relating to the 20042006 fiscal year which was paid in the first half of 2005.


2007.

The table below sets forth the total gross compensation (including fixed and variable compensation) paid to members of our executive committee other than our chairman and chief executive officer in 2004 and 2005:from 2005 to 2007:


 

Fixed compensation

Variable compensation

Total compensation

Compensation paid in 2004

2,280,000

1,048,800*

3,328,800

Compensation paid in 2005

2,393,989

1,539,360**

3,933,349

*

Includes the variable compensation due in respect of the 2003 fiscal year and paid in 2004.

**

Includes the variable compensation due in respect of the 2004 fiscal year and paid in 2005.


(in euros)

Fixed compensation

Variable compensation

Total

compensation

Compensation paid in 2005

2,393,989

1,539,360*

3,933,349

Compensation paid in 2006

2,431,494

1,950,000**

4,381,494

Compensation paid in 2007

2,160,041

2,109,478***

4,269,519

*

Variable compensation for the 2004 fiscal year and paid in 2005.

**

Variable compensation for the 2005 fiscal year and paid in 2006.

***

Variable compensation for the 2006 fiscal year and paid in 2007.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 55115



Back to contentsContents


In addition to the above compensation, a profit-sharing payment of €18,000€30,000 in respect of the 20042006 fiscal year was paid in June 2005.2007.


Directors’ fees to members of the executive committee of our company in office in 2007 totaled €203,308 as result of their positions within companies of the Veolia Environnement Group in France and abroad.

In 2005,2007, none of our directors or executive officers were parties to contracts with us or our subsidiaries that provided for the award of benefits upon termination of their employment.employment, other than the supplementary retirement plan described below.

Supplementary Retirement Plan

At its meeting of September 15, 2005, theour board of directors decided to establish a supplementary retirement plan with defined benefits, starting from the fiscal year 2006, for the chairman and chief executive officer and other members of the executive committee, in line with the practices of other companies listed in the CAC 40. This supplementary retirement plan being a regulated agreement subject to the new provisions of Article L.225-42-1 of the French Commercial Code, it was approved at the general shareholders’ meeting of May 11, 2006.   

The supplementary retirement plan, established by the board of directors and approved by shareholders on May 11, 2006 will become effective in 2006 andwhose financing is outsourced to an insurance company, has the following characteristics:

·

a specific regime that takes into account the cancellation (followingfollowing the separation from Vivendi)of the groups Vivendi and Veolia Environnement of the retirement plan from which groupGroup executives benefited until December 31, 2002 and the acquired seniority as employees of the former principal shareholder of the Company, Compagnie Générale des Eaux (later named Vivendi then Vivendi Universal, and now Vivendi once again)then Vivendi);

·

a retirement benefit that is in addition to other retirement benefits, acquired as a function of seniority, which is capped at 25% of covered compensation (for 25 years of seniority);

·

a limit on total retirement benefits fixed at 50% maximum of covered compensation (which isbased on the average of the three most recent compensation schedules).compensations received.

The financingAs of this retirement plan will be outsourced to an insurer.

On the basis ofDecember 31, 2007, and based on current estimates, (actuarial calculations), the total cost of this retirement plan (current value of future benefits orValeur Actuelle des Prestations Futures) is expected to amount to €11.4€27.7 million for the members of the executive committee, of which €11.9 million relate to the chairman and chief executive officer and €16 million for the other members of the executive committee (or a total cost of €27.4 million).officer. This is subject to the beneficiaries’ continued service with our company until the time that they retire, and are eligible to receive benefits, in accordance with the provisions of the French “Fillon” law.

Details of the Compensation Paid to Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Compensation paid to Mr. Proglio in 20052007 was determined according to terms proposed by the nominations and compensation committee and approved by theour board of directors.

During 2005,2007, Mr. Proglio received the fixed portion of his compensation for 20052007, as well as the variable portion of his compensation for the 20042006 fiscal year paid in early 2005,2007, which was determined at the board of directors’ meeting of March 29, 2005.2007. He also received other benefits (avantages en nature), as well as the directors’ fees to which he was entitled as a director of Veolia Environnement and certain of its subsidiaries.


Fixed Portion of 20052007 Compensation


The board of directors followed the recommendation of the nominations and compensation committee, and decided during the meeting held on March 29, 2007 to increase the fixed portion of Mr. Proglio’s compensation, which had not been changed since 2005, for the 20052007 fiscal year by 5%. The fixed portionto an amount of Mr. Proglio’s compensation for the 2005 fiscal year therefore amounted to €945,000 (compared to €900,000 during the previous year).  At its meeting of March 28, 2006, the board of directors decided to leave this amount unchanged for the 2006 fiscal year.


€992,000.  

Variable Portion of the2006 and 2007 Compensation


Based on the recommendations of the nominations and compensation committee, 70% of the variable portion of 2006 and 2007 compensation is based on the satisfaction of various performance criteria that have been pre-determined by the board of directors, while 30% is based on qualitative performance as determined by the board.



Variable compensation for 2004: The amount of Mr. Proglio’s variable compensation in respect of the 2004 fiscal year was determined by the board of directors at its meeting of March 29, 2005, based on the recommendation of the nominations and compensation committee. This amount was paid116



Back to Mr. Proglio during the first half of 2005. The performance indicators used by the board to determine this amount, based on the objectives of the 2004 budget, were: the level of return on capital employed (excluding FCC), net recurring income and the improvement in net financial debt, with each indicator carrying a 1/3 weighting.  Since each of these indicators had reached the desired level during 2004, the board of directors awarded Mr. Proglio variable compensation of €850,000 for fiscal year 2004, including the qualitative part of the variable compensation.Contents


Variable compensation for 20052006: Based on the recommendationrecommendations of the nominations and compensation committee, the board of directors decided at its meeting of March 29, 200528, 2006 that the performance indicators (under IFRS) to be used by the board in determining the quantitative portion of Mr. Proglio’sthe chairman and chief executive officer’s variable compensation in respect of the 20052006 fiscal year, based on the objectives of the 20052006 budget and achievements, would be: adjusted operating income and adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the level of return on capital employed and the level of EBIT (recurring operating income), with each indicator carrying a 50% weighting.  The board concluded that given the reduction in debt that had already occurred, the previous indicator of “improvement in net financial debt” had become less important than future trends in operating income.parent. At its meeting of March 28, 2006,29, 2007, the board awarded Mr. Henri Proglio €1,062,500 in€1,275,000, that is, 100% of the variable portion of his compensation for the 20052006 fiscal year, based on the application of formulas and taking into account results obtained.   

Variable compensation for 2007: Based on the recommendations of the nominations and compensation committee, the board of directors decided at its qualita tive assessmentmeeting of March 29, 2007 that the performance indicators (under IFRS) to be used by the board in determining the quantitative portion of the chairman and chief executive officer’s variable compensation in respect of the 2007 fiscal year, based on the objectives of the 2007 budget and achievements in 2007 compared to those in 2006, would be: the adjusted operating income and the adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent, in equal measure. Due to the capital increase completed in July 2007, which automatically increased net income, the board of directors decided at its meeting of March 25, 2008 to replace this indicator with the adjusted net income per share, as proposed by the appointments and compensation committee.  Th e board awarded Mr. Henri Proglio €1,423,020 as the variable portion of his performance as well ascompensation for the achievement2007 fiscal year, based on the application of formulas and taking into account results achieved.  This amount represented an increase of 11.6% compared to the performance objectives set forth above.


variable portion of his compensation in 2006.

Other Benefits


In addition to the fixed and variable compensation described above, Mr. Proglio received benefits in 20052007 totaling €2,616,€2,954, relating to use of a company car.


Directors’ fees paid by Veolia Environnement and its subsidiaries


In 2005, Mr. Proglio2007, our chairman and chief executive officer received gross directors'directors’ fees from us totaling €34,000,€40,000, which were paid in respect of the last quarter of 20042006 and the first three quarters of 20052007 (fees due for the last quarter of 20052007 were paid in January 2006)2008).  Directors’ fees paid to Mr. Proglio are subject to French taxes (CSG/CRDS deduction) that are withheld from the amounts paid to Mr. Proglio.

Mr. Proglio also received directors'directors’ fees fromwith respect to offices he holds in our subsidiaries in both France and abroad totaling €70,912.




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 56



Back to contents


€64,079.

Variation between Mr. Proglio’s Compensation in 2004 andfrom 2005 to 2007


The table below sets forth the total gross compensation paid to Mr. Proglio in 2004 andfrom 2005 to 2007 (including fixed and variable compensation, directors’ fees and benefits):.

 (in euros)

Various compensation

Directors’ fees paid by subsidiaries

Benefits(1)

Total gross compensation

Fixed

Variable

Directors’ fees paid by VE

Compensation paid in 2005

944,996

850,000(2)

34,000

70,912

2,616

1,902,524

Compensation paid in 2006

944,996

1,062,500(3)

38,250

66,382

2,666

2,114,794

Compensation paid in 2007

992,000

1,275,000(4)

40,000

64,079

2,954

2,374,033

(1)

Related to a company car.

(2)

Variable compensation due in respect of the 2004 fiscal year and paid in 2005.

(3)

Variable compensation due in respect of the 2005 fiscal year and paid in 2006.

(4)

Variable compensation due in respect of the 2006 fiscal year and paid in 2007.



117


 

Various compensation

Directors' fees paid by subsidiaries

Benefits*

Total gross compensation

Fixed

Variable

Directors' fees paid by VE

Compensation paid in 2004

900,000

473,620**

24,517

70,395

3,898

1,472,430

Compensation paid in 2005

944,996***

850,000****

34,000

70,912

2,616

1,902,524


*

RelatedBack to a company car.

**

Variable compensation due in respect of the 2003 fiscal year and paid in 2004.

** *

The amount approved by the board of directors meeting of March 29, 2005 (€945,000) and referred to above was rounded.

*** *

Variable compensation due in respect of the 2004 fiscal year and paid in 2005.Contents


Retirement Plan

In 2005, Mr. Proglio benefitedbenefits from a collective supplementary retirement plan with a fixed subscription (cotisations définies) that we provideprovides to our senior management.

Pension or Retirement Benefits

The aggregate amount that we set aside or accrued to provide pension,management, and the collective supplementary retirement or similarplan with defined benefits during 2005 for members of senior management(prestations définies) put in place by our company as of December 31, 2005 was €650,000. We do not provide pension, retirement or similar benefits to directors except tothe 2006 fiscal year for our chairman and chief executive officer who benefits fromand the supplementary retirementmembers of the Executive Committee described above.

Obligations concerning share subscription and share purchase options granted to the president and chief executive officer and granting of free shares.

The law of December 30, 2006, relating to the development of the participation of employees in stock ownership plans, introduced new measures included in article L.225-185 of the Commercial Code, regarding share subscription options or share purchase options granted to legal representatives.  The board of directors must decide whether the options cannot be exercised by the parties before the end of their functions, or must fix the quantity of shares held following the exercise of options which they have to conserve until the end of their functions. The same constraints are applicable to shares granted freely to the chairman and chief executive officer under Article L.225-197-1 of the Commercial Code. These provisions are applicable to plans implemented after the law came into effect.

Following the publication of this law, the nominations and compensation committee performed a review of the provisions that may be applied to the next stock option plan we providefor the benefit of the chairman and chief executive officer, and presented its conclusions to the board on March 29, 2007.

According to these recommendations, the board adopted internal rules pursuant to which Henri Proglio will have to form and retain a portfolio of our senior management.shares in proportion to the excess value, net tax and financing, realized on the exercised options. In accordance with these regulations, the president and chief executive officer will hold a portfolio of the Company’s shares equal to 50% of the remaining shares issued by virtue of the exercise, after payment of taxes (taxation of the exercise value and corporate payments) and the cost of financing (number of options which it is necessary to exercise to finance the exercise price of the portfolio).


Because the policy of granting free shares decided by our board of directors during its meeting of March 29, 2007 did not include the granting of any shares to the chairman and chief executive officer, the board did not define, for the chairman and chief executive officer any restrictions such as those applicable to share subscription or purchase options.     

BOARD PRACTICES


Following our transformationreorganization into asociété anonyme à conseil d’administrationwith a board of directors on April 30, 2003, our existing accounts, audit and commitments committee and nominations and compensation committee were retained and their charters adapted to the needs of the new board of directors of our company.  On September 14, 2006, the board of directors of our company also formed a strategic research, innovation and sustainable development committee.

Accounts and audit committee

The accounts audit and commitments committee was renamed the “accounts and audit committee” atcommittee’s duties, as described in its internal charter, were updated during the meeting of the board of directors’ meeting of March 9, 2006.  At the board meetingdirectors of May 11, 2006 in order to take into account changes in U.S. regulations applicable to the assessment of internal controls over financial and accounting information.  

This committee consists of three to five members appointed, along with its missions were updated.  Itchairman, by our board of directors based on the recommendation of the nominations and compensation committee.

The committee consists of three members,1 all of whom are independent under the board’s charter2: Murray Stuart (chairman), Jean-Marc Espalioux and Paul-Louis Girardot.

According to the committee’s charter, members must be selected on the basis of their financial or accounting skills. At its meetings of March 5, 2004 and March 29, 2005, the board of directors determined that Messrs. Espalioux, Girardot and Stuart qualified as “audit committee financial experts” within the meaning of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act, given their experience and skills.

1  Because of his professional commitments, Mr. Jean Azéma asked to be dismissed from his position as member of the committee in early 2007.

2  All of these committee members are also deemed to be independent according to the criteria set forth in the Listed Company Manual of the New York Stock Exchange.



118



Back to Contents


The accounts and audit committee meets at least five times per year at the request of its chairman or the chairman of the board of directors in order to review the semi-annual and annual financial statements before they are presented to the board of directors. In 2007, the committee met six times.  The average attendance level at meetings in 2006 was 77.8%.

Duties

The accounts and audit committee principally performs the following functions:

·

Regarding accounting matters, the committee (i) reviews, along with the auditors, the appropriateness and consistency of the accounting methods adopted to prepareapplied in the preparation of the financial statements and examines whether significant transactions have been adequately treated, (ii) provides an opinion on the draft semi-annual and annual financial statements, and (iii) meets, if necessary, with the auditors, management and financial officers to discuss various issues, the committee being entitled to meet with such persons outside of the presence of management;our company’s management.  

·

Regarding internal auditing and internal control, the committee is informed of the procedures established and implemented in connection with internal control over financial reporting,(i) examines theour Group’s annual internal audit plan and receives a periodic summary of theour group’s internal audit reports.  Thereports; and (ii) in connection with the evaluation of internal control procedures (as required by section 404 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act), the committee periodically receives from our company information regarding the organization and the internal control procedures relating to financial and accounting information; and, when needed, the committee meets aswhen necessary with the internal audit director to discuss the organization of internal audit;audit.

·

Regarding the supervision of our company’s independent auditors, the committee (i) examines the auditors’ work plan andschedule of operations, (ii) meets as necessary with the auditors and our company’s management, including ourits accounting and treasury officers.  The committee is entitled to meet with such personsofficers, if needed outside the presence of our management. Any permissible non-auditcompany’s management, (iii) gives an opinion on the amount of the fees requested for the exercise of legal audit missions, (iv) gives its prior approval for any audit-related services to be performed by the auditors, require the prior approval(v) remains informed of the committee, which also reviewsamount of the fees paid by our company paysand our Group to the auditors for all of their services and assuresthe auditor’s network and ensures that the amount of these feespayments does not call into question the independence of the auditors. The committee alsoauditors, and (vi) supervises the procedure for selecting the independentstatutory auditors.  

PursuantActivities during 2007

In 2007, the accounts and audit committee completed its work within the framework of an annual program.  The substance of its meetings is included in minutes and the chairman of the committee reports to the board of directors. In addition to examining our company’s quarterly, semi-annual and annual financial statements, the committee periodically reviewed the action plans and the progress of work undertaken by our company in 2007 in order to comply with its internal control requirements under Section 404 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act.  The committee reviewed the synthesis of internal audit missions and programs for 2007 and approved the internal audit program for 2008. The committee also reviewed, along with our company’s managers, key information which could affect its missions, including reports on cash flow, tax and legal matters, and information technology.  The committee also approved the duties and fees of our company’s auditors for 2007 and supervised the process through which KPMG SA was appointed statutory auditor, succeeding Salustro Reydel, as well as the rotation of partners of our statutory audit firms.  It also approved the 2008 budget and examined the organization of our Group’s risk management and the mapping of major risks, as well as pending actions and the 2008-2009 risk management program.

The committee may meet with individuals and experts outside our company if necessary.  It may also meet with our company’s financial officers or auditors outside the presence of the chairman and chief executive officer. Accordingly, during 2007 the chairman and/or members of the committee met and communicated with our company’s senior executive vice president, the financial services director, the financial control director, the risk and internal audit director, the general secretary, the general counsel, the risks and markets director and the auditors.  The committee did not consult with any outside consultants in 2007.

Nominations and compensation committee

The nominations and compensation committee’s charter members must be selected on the basis of their financial or accounting skills.  The committee’s charter also provides that the committee must consist of three to five members appointed, along with its chairman, by the board of directors upon the recommendation of the then current members of the nominations and compensation committee.  

The committee currently consists of fourthree members, threetwo of whom are independent(*independent (*) based on criteria set forth inunder the board’s charter (all of them are deemedcharter: Serge Michel (chairman), Daniel Bouton (*) and Louis Schweitzer (*).



119



Back to be independent based on criteria of the NYSE manual): Murray Stuart* (chairman), Jean Azema*, Jean-Marc Espalioux*Contents


The nominations and Paul-Louis Girardot. Thecompensation committee meets at least twice a year at the request of its chairman or the chairman of the board of directorsdirectors. In 2007, the committee met three times. The average attendance level at least five times each year.  meetings was 100%.

Nominations and compensation committeeDuties

OurThe nominations and compensation committee principally performs the following functions:

·

RegardingWith respect to compensation, the committee (i) studies and makes annual recommendations onregarding the compensation of directors and executive officers and with respect toregarding retirement and other benefits. The committee alsobenefits, and gives an opinion on compensation of principal executive officers and senior managers of our company, (ii) proposes athe total amount and breakdown for theof directors’ fees, paid to directors, and(iii) advises the board of directors onregarding stock option policypolicies and awards. The committeeawards, (iv) is also informed of the compensation policy for the principal executive officers of our company’s subsidiaries, and (v) examines all share capital increases reserved for employees;employees.  

·

RegardingWith respect to nominations, the nominations and compensation committee makes recommendations regardingwith respect to the appointment of our directors and senior managersexecutive officers and arranges for their succession. It also recommends the nomination of members and a chairman for each of our company’s committees.  The committee’s choices must strive toshould reflect a diversity of experience and points of view and assureensure that the board remainsremain objective and independent with respect to a shareholder or group of shareholders.  With this in mind, and in light of the expiration of the terms of half of our directors in 2006 in accordance with the rolling renewal mechanism described above, the committee recommended at the board meeting of March 28, 2006 that the terms of Serge Michel, Daniel Bouton, Jean-Marc Espalioux, Paul-Louis Girardot, Georges Ralli and Murray Stuart be renewed for six years, and that Mr. Jean-Francois Dehecq be appointed to replace Mr. Jacques Espinasse as a director. The committee also strives tomust ensure that independent directors represent at least half of the members of the board of directors, two-thirds of the members of the accounts and audit committee and half of the members of the nominations and compensation committee.

TheEach year, the nominations and compensation committee also performs an annual evaluation, on a case-by-case basis, of the independence of each director in light of the criteria for independence mentioned in the board of directors’ charter and submits its findingsproposals to the board of directors.  It also organizes and coordinates the required evaluation of the board’s functioning, and submits its opinion regarding the performance of our company’s executive management.

The committee’s charter provides thatTo perform its duties, the committee must consistmay interview different members of our company’s or our Group’s management.

Activities during 2007

In 2007, the nominations and compensation committee was dedicated to preparing recommendations and proposals to the board relating to the compensation of the chief executive officer (2007 fixed component and 2006 variable component) and the determination and distribution of director’s fees, as well as the review of the proposals concerning the compensation of our company’s executive committee members.

The committee also submitted an opinion to the board of directors on the policies relating to the award of stock options and free shares and on the resolutions submitted to the general shareholders’ meeting of May 10, 2007 relating to them. The committee also presented its conclusions and recommendations to the board of directors on the implementation of the new retention obligation for shares issued as a result of the exercise of stock options by the chairman and chief executive officer pursuant to the law of December 30, 2006 relating to the development of the participation of employees in stock ownership plans.

In addition, the committee made a proposal at the board of directors meeting of March 29, 2007 relating to the appointment of Mr. Augustin de Romanet de Beaune, the new chief executive officer of the Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations, as director replacing Mr. Francis Mayer.

Lastly, in 2007, the committee evaluated the independence of the directors and conducted a formal evaluation of the functioning of the board of directors, the conclusions of which were presented during the board meeting of December 19, 2007.

Strategic research, innovation and sustainable development committee

At its meeting held on September 14, 2006, the board of directors of our Company created a strategic research, innovation and sustainable development committee, along with a committee charter.



120



Back to Contents


This committee has three to five members, who are appointed by the board of directors based on recommendations of the nominations and compensation committee.  The chairman of the committee is appointed by the board of directors based on a proposal from the chairman of the board.

The committee is composed of three members appointed by the board of directors upon the recommendation of the then current members of the nominations and compensation committee.  The committee currently consists of three members,on September 14, 2006, two of whom are independent(*independent (*): Serge MichelMessrs. Philippe Kourilsky (chairman), Louis Schweitzer*Paul-Louis Girardot (*) and Daniel Bouton*Jean-Marc Espalioux (*).  The

Pursuant to the committee charter, the committee meets at the request of its chairman or the chairman of the board of directorsdirectors.  It meets at least twothree times eachper year.  In 2007, the committee met a total of 10 times. The attendance rate was 100%.



Duties

VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 57The committee’s mission is to evaluate “research and development” and “sustainable development” policies and strategies proposed by our Group’s relevant departments and to advise the board of directors accordingly.



BackIt is kept informed of programs and high-priority actions that have been undertaken and evaluates the results.  In particular, it receives information relating to contentsbudgets and manpower, and advises on the allocation of means and resources and their adequacy in light of proposed objectives.


The committee principally communicates with the chairman of the board of directors, senior management and the Company’s executive committee, the “research and development” and “sustainable development” departments of the Group as well as all executives within the Company who may provide useful input or opinions.

The Committee may also consult with third parties outside of the Company whose participation may be useful in the fulfillment of its duties.  It may consult with outside experts as needed.

Activities during 2007

In 2007, the committee’s activities were devoted to the organization of numerous meetings with our Group’s management, including with our company’s chairman and chief executive officer, the managers of our Group’s divisions, and the director of the development and technology research department. Four working groups addressing research and development themes, technological and scientific oversight, innovation and the resources needed for R&D and innovation activities were created upon the request of the committee. In 2007, it continued its analysis and review of Veolia Environnement Group’s strategy with respect to innovation and oversight and identified potential improvement lines. In 2007, the committee relied on outside consultants to conduct additional studies.   

Committees created by management

Disclosure committee

In addition toOur Company’s chairman of the committees above, our chief executive officermanagement board (directoire) and our chief financial officer created a disclosure committee (comité de communication), which was presented to our company’s former management board on December 11, 2002.  OurThe chief executive officer or, in his absence, ourthe senior executive vice president chairspresides over meetings of the disclosure committee.  

In addition to ourthe chief executive officer and ourthe senior executive vice president, the permanent members of the committee include the heads of each of our company’s divisions (water, energy services, waste management and transportation) and the principal executive officers of our company’s corporate departments.

Pursuant to its charter, the disclosure committee principally: (i) oversees the implementation of internal procedures to collectconcerning the collection and control of information aboutconcerning our company that will be disclosed to the public; (ii) defines the process for preparing our company’s reports and other communications;disclosure; (iii) examines the information to be disclosed and approves the final version of reports or communications (inother disclosure, in particular ourthe U.S. Form 20-F),20-F, which are filed with French and U.S.American regulatory authorities; and (iv) approves the procedures for publication or filing of these documents.

The disclosure committee reports on its work to the chief executive officer and the senior executive vice president. It meets as often as necessary in order to assure the accomplishmentfulfillment of its mission,duties, but at least two times eachno less than twice a year, including (i) once before the end of each year to organize and launch the drafting of our company’s French reference document and annual reports (Frenchdocument de référence andreport on Form 20-F),20-F, and (ii) prior tobefore the filing of ourthe annual report on Form 20-F with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to evaluate and validateapprove the report. The disclosure committee may also meet before the announcement of any significant event.events.



121



Back to Contents


The disclosure committee met twice in 2007.  During its June 22, 2007 meeting, it reviewed and approved our company’s annual report on Form 20-F as well as the certifications required from its chief executive officer and senior executive vice president in accordance with U.S. regulatory provisions. At its December 3, 2007 meeting, the disclosure committee principally reviewed regulatory developments relating to reports and other communications designed for public disclosure and, particularly, the convergence of IAS and IFRS standards and U.S. GAAP. It also launched the process of collecting information and preparing for drafts of our company’s annual reports for the 2007 fiscal year. In addition, it reviewed the comments we had received from the SEC relating to our company’s 2006 Form 20-F, as well as those it received from the AMF in connection with its review of the 2006 reference document.

Ethics committee

In February 2003, we implemented an ethics program entitled “Ethics, Commitment and Responsibility,” which was updated in December 2004. This program is intended to guide the daily behavior of our employees with respect to ethical matters.  

In March 2004, we created an ethics committee to examine and settle any questions relating to the ethics program. The ethics committee hasconsists of three to five members chosen by our company’s executive committee and may pursue any matter that it wishes regarding group ethics. Employees may also freely consult with the committee. The ethics committee must act independently with respect to matters it treats and hold the information relating thereto confidential.

The committee elects its own chairman, with no particular power being provided for in relation to other members, except that of a casting vote in the event of a tie in voting.  The committee currently has three members.  Members of the committee may include employees, former employees or persons outside of our company selected among candidates with a good knowledge of our Group’s businesses and a professional position guaranteeing the independence and perspective necessary for the position.  The committee’s decisions require a majority approval.  Its members are subject to strict confidentiality requirements and are not authorized to discuss their personal positions outside the committee.  The committee may rely on correspondents designated to it by each of our Group’s divisions.

In accordance with its internal charter, the ethics committee’s duty is to make all recommendations concerning the fundamental values of Veolia Environnement, relating either to subjects it decides to examine or following questions that have been brought to its attention.  In application of this principal, the ethics committee may, in particular, perform “ethics audits” in any of our Group’s operations, whether in France or abroad. The principal purpose of this procedure is to assess, based on interviews with selected individuals representing as faithfully as possible the operation in question, the level of employees’ ethical commitment, their knowledge of our Group’s values, the ethical problems they may encounter, and the training they receive (from their supervisors) or give (to their colleagues) on the subject.

Pursuant to the “whistleblowing” provision of Article 301 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the ethics committee is in charge of receiving and handling, in coordination with the accounts and audit committee, all employee inquiries relating to accounting, auditing or internal control matters.  On June 14, 2005, the accounts and audit committee approved the set of procedures to be followed for handling and following up on these employee inquiries.

As such, the ethics committee handles notices sent to it by employees of our Group relating to breaches of our Group’s “Ethics, Beliefs and Responsibility” program. The committee has all necessary authority to perform its duties: it can consult with any Group employee, statutory auditor or third party.  It can also request the assistance of our internal audit department or use the services of external experts.  It has access to all of the sites and all companies of our Group.

In 2007, the committee reported to the accounts and audit committee and to the executive committee concerning its operations and expressed the reasons for which it was satisfied as well as its expectations.



122



Back to Contents


EMPLOYEES

Employee Information

The corporate information below has been drawnis taken from an international database, which we have worked onbeen developing since 2001. This database includes, for all of the companies in our Group whose results are fully or proportionally consolidated for accounting purposes, approximately 150 corporate indicators, that yield more than one hundred corporate indicators, yielding more than 150,000225,000 pieces of data per year, which can be sorted by company, country and geographical area or region.  All companies within our group whose results are either fully or proportionally consolidated for accounting purposes are included in this database.

The main corporatesalient indicators drawn from the international database are presented below under different subheadings.  Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such figures, in particular in the case of averages, since the figures below are often aggregated across all parts of the world, and may require more detailed analysis at the level of the specific geographic area, country or business concerned.

The 2003 data appearing below has been retreated to take into account changes in our scope, so as to make comparisons with 2004 data more meaningful.  As a result, the 2003 data below excludes the employees of FCC and the employees of the sold activities of USFilter Corporation.

Total Number of Employees


As of December 31, 2005,2007, we had 271,153319,502 employees, (including 100% of the employees of companies that are proportionally consolidated by our company), an increase of 7.78% (19,5697.04% (21,004 employees) over 251,584298,498 employees as of December 31, 2004.  In 2003, we had 241,228 employees.2006.

The following table shows the distribution of ourVeolia Environnement’s employees by activity and geographic location as of December 31, 2005:2007:

 

Water*

Waste Management*

Energy Services

Transportation

Total

%

Europe

51,791

48,398

40,644

55,305

196,554**

72.49%

Of which metropolitan France

28,101

32,887

18,715

26,812

106,931**

39.44%

North America

3,355

11,295

23

11,894

26,567

9.80%

South America

2,602

7,424

5,283

795

16,104

5.94%

Africa/Middle East

7,634

6,138

467

300

14,539

5.36%

Asia/Pacific

5,383

7,499

499

4,008

17,389

6.41%

Total

70,765

80,754

46,916

72,302

271,153**

100%

%

26.10%

29.78%

17.30%

26.66%

100%

 
       

*

 Proactiva’s employees (8,637 employees) have been divided according to activity, between water (1,718 employees) and waste services (6,919 employees).

**

The total number for France includes 416 employees who work at the Company's headquarters and at the Veolia Environnement Campus.


 

Water*

Environmental Services*

Energy Services

Transportation

Total

%

Europe

55,945

68,288

43,794

61,166

229,889**

71.95%

of which metropolitan France


29,725


35,928


20,058


31,027


117,434**


36.76%

North America

3,626

11,243

109

13,890

28,868

9.04%

South America

2,925

7,369

7,225

1,697

19,216

6.01%

Africa/Middle East

7,726

7,355

1,266

498

16,845

5.27%

Asia/Pacific

12,645

5,777

1,981

4,281

24,684

7.73%

Total

82,867

100,032

54,375

81,532

319,502**

100%

%

25.94%

31.31%

17.02%

25.52%

100%

 

*

Proactiva’s employees (8,789 employees) have been divided according to activity, between water (1,939 employees) and waste services (6,850 employees).

**

The total number for France includes 696 employees who work at our company's headquarters, at the Centre d’Analyses Environnementales and at the Veolia Environnement Campus.

As of December 31, 2005, 39.44%2007, 36.76% of our employees were located in France, 33.07%35.19% in the rest of Europe, 8.89%9.04% in the United StatesNorth America and 18.60%19.01% in the rest of the world.


Breakdown of employees by type of contract and by category


As of December 31, 2005,2007, we employed 251,842319,502 persons, of whom 298,008 persons (representing 92.9%93.3% of our employees) worked under indefinite term employment contracts and 19,31121,494 persons under fixed-term employment contracts.  During 2005, 4,9792007, 8,030 fixed-term employment contracts were converted into indefinite term employment contracts (or 25.8%37.4%).  As of December 31, 2005, 21,9952007, 27,048 of our employees (or8.1%(or8.5% of total employees) were managers, 249,158292,454 were non-managerial employees, and 52,58365,519 were women (or 19.4%20.5% of total employees).


In France, among the 107,202117,716 employees as of December 31, 20052007 (including 271282 employees in Réunion), 101,249110,413 (or 94.4%93.8%) were employed under indefinite term employment contracts and 5,9537,303 under fixed-term employment contracts. During 2005, 2,2702007, 3,065 fixed-term contracts were converted into indefinite term contracts (or 38.1 %)42%). Of our employees in France, 11,53313,393 (or 10.8%11.4%) were managers, 95,669104,423 were non-managerial employees and 21,85325,770 (or 20.4%21.9%) were women.




123



Back to Contents


Weighted average annual number of employees

This figure corresponds to the number of employees that we would have had if the latter had all been working full time during the entire year.  It is calculated by weighting the total number of employees against the employment rate and the amount of time worked by each employee.  In 2005,2007, our weighted average number of employees was 252,643,291,140.2, of which 237,630270,880.2 (or 94.1%93.0%) were employed under indefinite term employment contracts.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 58



Back to contents


In France, the weighted average number of employees during 20052007 was 101,515,110,520, of which 96,359103,964 (or 94.9%94%) were employed under indefinite term employment contracts.

Consolidated weighted average annual number of employees

This figure is calculated by weighting the average annual number of employees of consolidated companies against the level of consolidation of such companies.  In 2005,2007, the consolidated weighted average number of employees was 241,627.284,072.  

Temporary employees

The number of temporary employees during 2005in 2007 (in full time equivalent)equivalents) was 10,566,14.026, which represents 4.2%4.8% of the total full-time equivalentequivalents of employees. In France, the number of temporary employees during 2005in 2007 (in full time equivalent)equivalents) was 7,236,7,648, which represents 7.1%6.9% of the total full-time equivalentequivalents of employees.

Human Resources Policies

We count numerous companies as partAt the end of 2007, we had 319,502 employees, an increase of 7% compared to 2006. This increase reflects the rapid international development of our group,Group, the activities of which must be adapted to local circumstances. Accordingly, human resource management is largely decentralized, though we nevertheless seek to disseminate some common tools and principles throughout our divisions in order to establish a consistent long-term policy.

For many years, our human resource management has focused on developing the skills of current employees, in order to foster their professional development and enhance the opportunities for internal mobility.  In order to deal with an aging workforce and an increasing lack of skilled labor, we have also begun conducting a large and innovative recruiting campaign referred to as “Veolia Skills”. The objective under the campaign is to recruit 17,000 new employees between now and the end of 2007. As part of the effort, we are strengthening our existing training programs to prepare for future needs and to allow employees to continue their professional advancement.

At the same time, the improvement of working conditions and safety of employees is a constant endeavor for us, since the nature of our activities exposes certain employees to specific health and safety risks.territorially-based. As a leader in environmental services, we seekintend to serve as an example for other companies by puttingmaintain this growth rate and spread our corporate model in the physical68 countries in which we operate.

The integration of new employees and mental health concernsthe cultivation of their loyalty to the company are essential elements of our employeeshuman resources policy. In accordance with principles adopted several years ago, we is continuing our efforts to provide specialized training to each new employee in order for him or her to become professionals in his or her specific areas and grow throughout his or her career.  This training is also intended to enhance each employee’s sense of service and demonstrate the value of his or her contribution towards the provision of essential needs, the preservation of the environment and the well-being of the public.

One means of fostering this sense of service is through the combination of training courses and work experience. This type of training is gradually becoming the standard recruitment method in our Group’s various entities. In France, the “Veolia Skills” program illustrates our company’s concrete commitment to this approach through its professional skills training contracts.

With the support of the Veolia Environnement Campus and its international network, this ambitious commitment to skills is at the forefront.   center of our training policy. Through it, employees develop a sense of solidarity and a sense that they are contributing to the exchange of know-how. To further this method of recruitment, new campuses are currently being opened both locally and abroad. This new stage in training development will enable us to continue to spread our corporate model while adapting it to the regulatory context of each country.

RegardlessIn addition to our commitment to employment, our employment policy is structured around a number of themes that are aimed at combining personal growth with economic performance.

Safety remains a major concern and our Group is tirelessly pursuing its efforts to protect the naturehealth of their activities orour employees. In addition, reinforcing diversity and promoting equal opportunities are important issues for maintaining growth and fostering our values of coherence and solidarity.

The development of career paths and professional mobility, the maintenance of dialogue at every level and the expertise in human resources are assets that add value to our Group in all of the countries in which they conduct business, our subsidiaries are guided by the following common principles that are applied according to their specific local needs:we operate.

·

encouragingFinally, employee satisfaction is addressed through an equitable compensation policy which rewards individual efforts and allows employees to develop an interestbenefit from the company’s performance.



124



Back to Contents


Understanding our corporate reality

The consistent management of human resources within each division of our group requires a constant appraisal of corporate reality and operational practices. We have been ranked as one of the leaders among companies included in the lifeCAC 40 index in terms of their companythe thoroughness and quality of Veolia Environnement through the development of social dialogue and local initiatives (illustrated in 2005 by the establishment ofcorporate information we publish. We depend on a European Group Committee, following establishment of a Group Committee in France); and

·

providing employees with fair compensation based on their contribution to our activities, through compensation that includes salary, social welfare benefits and various forms of incentives and profit-sharing.

These principles serve to establish a corporate model that is shared by our group, which places men and women at the heart of economic and corporate success while respecting equality of opportunity and diversity.

Improving knowledge of social reality within our company

Since 2002, we have had an effective system for collecting and consolidating human resources data, which demonstrates our desire to go beyond legal requirements in this area. Each year, we use more than one hundred indicators to collect identical information in 64 countries, thanks to aworldwide network of more than 500600 correspondents throughoutin the world. Thisdivisions to collect, process and consolidate 160 employment-related indicators.

Specialized software is used to ensure that collection and confirmation of the data is strictly controlledreliable.  Data collection is followed by analysis by geographic location, country and covers alltype of activity.

The stability of certain indicators facilitates a better use and guarantees and encourages an objective and precise evaluation of corporate progress within each of our subsidiaries, thereby offeringentities. Our Group monitors various indicators with particularly close attention.  These progress indicators provide a snapshotglobal perspective on certain areas of employment policy set forth by our group’smanagement, which expects the various entities to focus on:

Employee loyalty;

Reduction of absenteeism;

Safe working conditions;

Reduction of temporary employment; and

Development of professional training and skills particularly through on-the-job training.


In order to improve human resources development.management in the coming years, analysis and internal examinations are underway to:

The collection system was improved

Analyze the evolution of indicators over the last three years and thus observe recurring themes,

Compare data from Veolia Environnement and its subsidiaries with publicly available information relating to corresponding business sectors (beginning in 2005 throughFrance),

Observe revenues by area and country,

Collect and highlight particularities within each division or within certain countries, and

Identify those areas where progress is needed in the implementationcoming years, defining objectives by profession and by country.


These projects will be pursued with the long-term objective of new software to enhancerefining the collection process, thereby allowing data tomethod of evaluating and managing corporate performance within Veolia Environnement and each of its subsidiaries.

This evaluation method must be more easily traced, as well as more reliable. Currently, the database includes nearly one million figures, allowing us to constantly track our corporate progress in a precise and reliable manner. We monitor ten indicators with heightened attention.  These relate to data concerning staff turnovers, limited-term contracts, overtime, absenteeism and workplace accidents. We have set targets for ourselves in various such areas, based on common indicators and progress objectives, which are then individualized, on a case by case basis, in order to take into account the activity involvedparticularities both of each job category and the local contextparameters of each subsidiary.country (such as practices, legislation, regulations and job protection) on the other hand.

In additionWe are aware of the need to collecting corporate data, in 2005 we pursuedanticipate the implementationprogress and long-term prospects of skills and professions, and are thus continuing to enhance our system to classifyof classification and manage employee skill sets. The system is based onmanagement of human resources through a detailed mapping of jobs and skill setsskill-sets across our various subsidiaries. We hope that,divisions, and through usea unified classification of this system, we will be able to reinforce ties between job posts and required training or certification programs.  The system will also help to facilitate deployment of a common classification system for managers, which weighs managerial posts differently based on various criteria.  Over time, each manager both inour managers.  In France and abroad, will be assigned a classification basedour Group focuses on his or her position. An analogous classification system is being deployed for control agents. All of these measures combinedto the corporate environment in which we are designedevolving and attempts to enhance professional developmentanticipate our transformations.  To this end, the corporate observatory, formed in 2001, conducts prospective analysis and anticipate future training needs.

In early 2005, we created a “social perspectives” department to oversee the work of the social observatory.  The latter is chargedstudies in partnership with foreseeing future social changes, which is necessaryresearch organizations in order to developformulate a corporate policy for the long-term.long-term human resources vision.  We must increasingly take into account the changing social environment of our subsidiariesdemographic pressure, transformations in order to be successful (demographic changes,the labor market, changes,reorientation of public policy in terms of recruitment and training, changeand changes in behavior regarding work, etc.).  Mr. Yves Lichtenberger, the President of the University of Marne-La-Vallée, is chairman of the social observatory,mobility and oversees studies conducted on various themes both internally andcareer choices in partnership with public institutions doing social science research.  In 2005, the social observatory’s work focused on:

·

improving tutoring activity,


·

managing an age pyramid across different activities,


·

implementing best practicesorder to reduce absenteeism, a study conducted in collaboration with Anact (Agence nationale pour l’amélioration des conditions de travail),


·

transferring know-how, a study conducted in collaboration with Creapt (Centre de recherches et d’études sur l’age et les populations au travail), and


·

conducting remote management training, a study conducted in collaboration with theCentre d’étude pour l’emploi.


Preparing for the future, valuing human resources, enhancing skills

Implementation of an agreement relating to skills development and professional advancement

An agreement signed on October 4, 2004 with our unions is expected to lead to significantanticipate changes in the area of skills management.  These changes will include: better anticipating training needs, developing initiatives in the area of professional advancement, recognizing and rewarding greater experience, developing professional mobility between organizations, developing individual careers, strengthening dialogue regarding skills and work organization, and affording employees with fewer skills better access to training programs.  Although these changes will take time to implement, this agreement has already caused most of our subsidiaries in France to re-examine and improve their practicesmodel that are appropriate for integrating new employees and conducting training programs.

Since the beginning of 2005, this agreement has been implemented at several levels:

·

at the central level, for example, there have been improvements relating to tutoring programs (at Veolia Energy Services in particular), professional advancement over the course of one’s career and continued training of the least skilled employees; and


a global corporate environment.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 59125



Back to contentsContents


·In 2007, the corporate observatory’s work focused on:

at

The CEREQ study (Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches sur les Qualifications) on the skill management agreement, the final report of which was presented to all parties involved, including the French committee of our Group, and

A study on absenteeism conducted in collaboration with the ANACT (National Agency for the Improvement of Work Conditions - Agence Nationale pour l’Amélioration des Conditions de Travail).

In 2007, a broad program entitled “Respecting differences and equal opportunities” was launched in order to identify the difficulties encountered in managing diversity and to seek best practices in this area.


Encouraging employee loyalty through the development of skills and professional progress

Professional training is the preferred method of skills development for all of our employees because it:

Allows them to acquire the required knowledge tailored to changes in their profession and our clients’ expectations;

Ensures their ability to progress and find employment throughout their professional life;

Encourages mobility;

Offers training courses leading to degrees or official qualifications.

In 2007, our entities in France continued the local level, there have been various agreements signed at Veolia Environmental Servicesimplementation of an agreement relating to professional development, establishment of an annual evaluation process,the development of tutoring, apprenticeshipsskills and work safety programs; and


·

at Veolia Transportation, individual working groups have been formed.


Pursuant to the agreement, we pooled our funds for professional training, during 2005. Accordingly, a common management structure now exists within OPCIB (Organisme Paritaire Collecteur InterBranches), which will now manage funds for most entities.  Veolia Transportation will nevertheless retain certain funds for itself relating to work-study programs.we signed with unions on October 4, 2004.  This implementation involves using various customized plans that take into account the priorities and specific features of each division.


“Veolia Skills” Program

Veolia Skills is a recruitment program launched in France in 2005 with the goal of anticipating business growth and the progress of obtaining employee qualifications. This campaign, which in 2007 involved 6,559 employees, is open to internal and outside candidates, of all ages and qualifications.   

Outside candidates are offered professional skills training contracts with terms of nine to 24 months. If the training is successful, the candidates obtain a diploma (from the CAP to a Master’s), and are offered an indefinite-term employment contract.  In addition to traditional recruitment channels, this year four buses with the Veolia logo were sent out across France to present our Group’s businesses and to seek candidates within local populations.  The program also benefited the internal candidates to whom skill development contracts or training periods were offered in order to increase their skills within our Group. This mobility is an example of the progress made under our framework agreement concerning skills development.  Moreover, in addition to the raising our profile through the recruitment campaign and encouraging employees’ educational mobility, this program of fers certain employees the opportunity to expand their roles by becoming instructors.

Given the success of the campaign, we are continuing Veolia Skills in 2008.


A strong ambition: training and work experience

In September 2005,order to maintain our position as leader in environmental services and continually reinforce the quality of our services, we engaged in a large and innovative recruiting campaign in France referred to as “Veolia Skills”. The objective under the campaign is to recruit 3,000 employees in 2005, 6,000 employees in 2006 and 8,000 new employees per year beginning in 2007.


All of these recruitments will involve professional skills training lasting between 9 and 24 months, which will lead to a diploma recognized by the French Education Ministry.  Once a diploma has been obtained, candidates will be offered indefinite-term employment.


This recruiting campaign is open not only to youths but also to persons over the age of 18, since we need employees of all ages within our organization. It is also open to existing employees,depend on one key asset: qualified personnel.  in order to afford them greaterdevelop employee skills within the constantly evolving context of our various divisions, our Group relies on Veolia Environnement Campus to coordinate our training policy, which is based on the following principles:

Provide experience to our Group’s employees in their division and professional context while promoting their acquired expertise to clients,

Organize the transfer of know-how within subsidiaries,

Support the policies of professional mobility and incareer development, and

Reinforce the spirit of ongoing skills development.corporate culture surrounding the environmental services division by emphasizing potential synergies (high added value for the Company’s clients) and solidarity.



126



Back to Contents


We have signed agreements with various partners in connection with this recruiting campaign, including:


·

ANPE, which is charged with helping to evaluate potential candidates using simulation techniques;


·

AFPA, which will assist with training and development;


·

The French Education Ministry, which is mobilizing its continuing education network, participating in training through apprenticeship programs and developing new diplomas to be awarded relating to environmental services.


The campaign nearly attained its recruitment goal for the first year, through the hiring of 2,650 candidates.  


Veolia Environnement Campus: serving the entire Group


a pivotal training site

TheAs a common platform for skills development for all Veolia Environnement divisions (water, energy services, environmental services and transportation), Veolia Environnement Campus provides a common skills development program forbrings together the training directors of all of our divisions: water, waste management, energy servicesGroup’s subsidiaries and transportation. It is the first training institute created by a private company in the environmental sector, and brings together in the same place:


·

the training departments associated with all of our activities;

·

an apprenticeship center, which welcomed 750 apprentices during 2005;

·

a continuing education center that welcomes nearly 15,000 trainees per year;

·

a business promotion service and relationship with schools to target and attract future employees (through forums and awards given to the best papers on matters relating to the environment);

·

special events (which gather approximately 10,000 visitors per year).


The campus also constitutes a technological showcase of our activities as well as a forum for cultural diversity and interaction. All campus enrollees share

As a technological showcase for our activities, the same relaxationVeolia Environnement Campus is also a pivotal training facility which is at the forefront of a worldwide network.

Taking into account our current development and prospects that are available to our business around the world, commercial, human, and financial considerations require the efficient management of training efforts and an optimization of our Group’s resources.  To this end, the purposes, implementation principles, and development areas within our Group’s training policy must be upheld in each country and on-site living spaces.


A greatly diversified training offerdivision, while taking local contexts into account.


Valuable initial and continued training

The campus’Veolia Environnement Campus, which provides training offer encompassesfor all of the skills necessaryrequired for the optimal provision of environmental services. It satisfies two basic needs:services, develops its programs in a manner that is responsive to the needs of continuing education, which is an essential skill development tool for employees and which also enables them to ensure their future employability.  Nearly 20,000 participants were admitted to the campus in 2007.


·

The campus’s program also responds to initial training to integrateneeds.  This part of the program allows for the involvement of young people into the workplace,who earn a professional degree through apprenticeship and work study;study (from the CAP to Master’s degree).  This is the case at the CFA (Centre de Formation des Apprentis) Institute of Urban Environment, where nearly 16 degrees were earned with a success rate of 92%.  These high-level degrees correspond to the Europeanlicence, Master’s and doctorate.


An international network and reliable partners

·

continuing educationIn order to developimprove the skillsimplementation of employees. Thisits ambitious training is developed together with subsidiaries to satisfy their needs for skill development as much as possible.


A spreading of missions worldwide


We rely upon our campus to give an international dimension to our training. Accordingly,policy, the Veolia Environnement Campus has spread its mission worldwide throughis at the creationcenter of training centersan international network of 18 campuses in 11 countries, as well as an increasing number of academic partnerships between the Group’s subsidiaries and local universities.

In 2007, three new CFAs were opened in France and are the first of the new regional campuses to become operational. The Chicago Campus opened in the United Kingdom,States. In the Czech Republic, and Morocco.  Other centers provide support in Germany, Australia, Sweden, Gabon, Malaysia, China and Mexico. The Veolia Environnement Campus also relies on partnerships with universities (Universitythe environmental services institute of Marne-la-Vallée, University of Cergy-Pontoise, University of Versailles Saint Quentin in Yvelines), professional schools (ESSEC, HEC, Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées) and research centers in France and abroad.Prague broadened its activities to all fields.  


Ensuring the safety and health of employees and improving working conditions


Our employees often work in public areas and private sites under conditions that involve risks to their safety. CertainIn addition, their work sometimes involves a certain level of physical stress that may result in health problems.

Confronted with these risks, relate to specific activities, such as handling of hazardous products, working at a client facility, encountering aggressive behavior by passengers and performing work that can lead to muscular-skeletal problems.


Eacheach division has prepared various voluntary policies for risk prevention policies, while integratinginvolving, as part of its operational management, the monitoring of accident indicators (frequencyrelating to the frequency and seriousness) into their operational management. seriousness of accidents.

In addition to the continuous improvement ofimprovements in safety material and individual protective gear, several priority safety measures have been systematically implemented within all of our Group’s companies, aimed at:


·

identifying and evaluating risks and integrating prevention measures, an effort that has been ongoing since 2002.  For example, Dalkia has continuedin order to focus on controlling the risk of legionella and eliminating asbestos in its installations;prevent them;


·

training and informing employees on how to recognize and prevent workplace accidents and understand the risks assumed: for example, an international daycontrol risks; one quarter of each employee’s training is dedicated to safety prevention and awareness actions was organized in 2005 by Veolia Environmental Services;health matters;


·

strengthening the network of safety network, in particular at the international level,providers and developing a dialogue and coordination of efforts with staff representatives, in the context of 2,736 groups which areemployees dedicated to the study of health and safety issues;issues in the context of 2,971 cases dedicated to these subjects;


·

supporting injured persons, both during their convalescence and the time thatonce they resume work.  Ittheir work;

implementing, on a case by case basis, a management system for health and safety at work, based on the international reference OHSAS 18001;

ensuring the safety of employees traveling for business in high-risk areas through the safety crisis team, which is also necessary to better understand the causes of accidents and, if necessary, to undertake the appropriate remedial actions for ensuring that such accidents do not happen again;


overseen by safety managers.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 60127



Back to contentsContents


·Our Group’s executive committee declared 2008 to be “World Safety Year for Veolia Environnement”. This initiative is focused on the prevention of professional, health and safety risks.  It has been implemented internationally and is designed to capitalize on existing practices. Five main actions, supported by a communication plan, will be implemented in early 2008:

ensuring

Define and launch our Group’s essential Health & Safety standards;     

Implement the safetycommitments of the executive committee regarding the problems of Health & Safety;

Set up an objective and performance review system for the management team;

Make Health & Safety an essential element of employee training and support;

Manage and control the implementation of the Health & Safety policies taking into account the progress of any policies already being used within different entities.

We strive to protect the health of its employees, who are either basedtheir families and that of people in or traveling for business in high-risk countries.  Each month, a list ofthe countries where travel is either prohibited or whereour Group does business. We implement our health policies through local actions.

Our Group conducts awareness and prevention campaigns. In 2006, we conducted an international campaign called “Hygiene for my health”, aimed at informing our employees of the importance of hand-washing, the first step in preventing an epidemic. The campaign informed employees of the importance of hygiene with regards to their health through dialogues and exchanges. The 2007 report on this campaign shows that 100,000 employees worldwide were affected.

Moreover, our Group has created health crisis management plans, for potential events like a flu pandemic. To prepare for such a risk, our operations strengthened specific precautions must be taken is circulated to employees.  This classification by country enables us to undertake appropriate measuresprovisions that would allow activities that are essential for achieving maximum security, and also makes possible rapid evacuations in the event they are necessary.


Employee health and the health of the population at large is a concernto continue without exposing their employees to risks.

Similarly, the Handicap Project was stepped up in every part of the world, but we must be even more vigilant in countries where the population suffers from a serious epidemic.  As a result, we have initiated the following actions:


·

in 2004, we joined the “World Coalition of Corporations against AIDS”,2006. This project aims at assisting recruiters and organized, in cooperation with the Pasteur Institute, an important AIDS prevention and treatment campaign in Gabon;


·

we conducted a hygiene awareness campaign named “Hygiene for My Health”, which encouraged people to wash their handsworks in order to counter infectious disease;


·

in Tangiers, Veolia Water pursued a program focusing on the improvement of water and water-treatment infrastructure and the raising of awareness regarding hygiene and health issues; and


·

finally,elaborate common tools for our four divisions by forming lateral working groups in order to confront a potential flu pandemic due tohelp integrate handicapped persons within the H5N1 virus, we created a special organization and developed action plans to help protect employeesworkforce.

Build and maintain essential servicesa relationship of confidence with employees

A dialogue with employees initiated upon arrival and integration of personnel

In France and abroad, we pursue our external growththrough several types of transactions, including mergers and acquisitions, the creation of local subsidiaries with industrial partners and public service delegation contracts signed with local governments.

In all cases, our employees play a key role in our success.

A major challenge is to allow employees to progress at every stage.  This applies to status, training, benefiting from know-how, transmission of skills, compensation and social benefits, and involves defining a new corporate mission based on our values, while continuing to respect the one that is in place.  Our human resources policy in these cases is based on conviction that the identification and validation of talents and skills is required in order to motivate managers and improve their performance.

The systematic evaluation of the local environment, mentality and teams in place is at the center of our company’s concerns and strategy; our Group’s expertise in employee benefits and human resources management are the most important elements for the public.success of all growth and integration transactions.



128



Back to Contents


Promoting socialStrengthening dialogue with employees at all levels


Strengthening social dialogue and developing consultation measures


Since we provideFor our Group’s local services, at or near client sites across different geographical areas,which are fundamental to our business, employee dialogue takes places mainly within operating units at the grounda local level. It is at this level that social partners are best able to findprovide appropriate solutions for organizing workconcerning organization, working conditions, developing skillsskill development and rewarding individual efforts.


While our human resources policy is strongly rooted in French tradition, it  This dialogue must also be adapted to the other countries where we haveour Group has a presence. After the establishment of a group committeeGroup Committee in France, we therefore sought to further develop consultation and social dialogue at the European level. On October 10, 2005, we signed an agreement to create a European Group Committee.  This agreement creates a dedicated space for social dialogue in each European country. The focus will be on a discussion and exchange of ideas between management andCommittee including employee representatives from 21 European countries was formed.  The resulting forum for employee dialogue operates on a range of issues.  These new forums for social dialogue will seek to enrich social dialogue by creating, in between the subsidiary level and the level of the European Group Committee, a “country” level for the exchange of information that captures the cultural diversity of each country in which we operate.three levels:


The subsidiary level will remain the natural place atlevel on which to engage inwhere traditional negotiations between management and employee representatives. occur,

The country level will allow for exchange of information and dialogue on various topics across several activities. all national themes,

The third level is occupied bywill be the European Group Committee.  The latter isCommittee, which shall be a forum for consultation and information on subjects that involveinvolving all employees. It may also negotiate agreements on transnational themes where implementation will vary by country, based on national legislation. Areas such as skills development, health and safety may be the subject of such agreements.


Employee representatives serving on the European Group Committee will be active participants in social dialogue at the country level, and will all be group employees.  This is intended to make the European Group Committee representative of all countries, service areas andour employees.


These efforts should help to intensify a spirit of consultation and negotiation, which is already very developed within our group. Consultative work involves 14,296 staff representatives worldwide, and in 2005 resulted in 1,341 agreements, 54% of which related to employee compensation, 13% to health, safety and work conditions, and 8% to social dialogue.


Favoring participation andImprove social innovation


We seek to enhance our employee initiatives, whether they be individual or collective, local or global. Since 2003, our company has pursued this objective by creating procedures for the diversitycollection and publication of information concerning all employee and community-related matters. Close to 1,200 initiatives were recorded in five years originating in all regions of the world where we conduct business, demonstrating our subsidiaries, which vary dependingGroup’s consistency and individual contributions.

These initiatives concern the essential objectives of human resources development: employment, professional progress, training, health and security, and the improvement of local populations’ living conditions. Their value depends upon their effective implementation based on their business activity, culture, location,local concerns, and are always guided by the objective of improving the progress of employees know-how and ability to innovate. The third annual reviewthe well-being of social initiatives shows just someresidents of their innovations. These innovations relate not only to employees, but also to the local population and environment in which these subsidiaries operate. In 2005, there were nearly 300 initiatives in 40 countries, in the areas of:where our Group conducts business.  Approximately 40 innovations become corporate initiatives, published in French and English and featured on the Internet and intranet sites.


·

employment,

·

skills development and training,

·

organization of work,

·

compensation and benefits,

·

health and safety,

·

corporate communication,

·

professional relations and social dialogue, and

·

other actions relatedIn addition, a panel meets annually to determine the integration of subsidiaries within their local environment.


This annual review of social initiatives offers readers the opportunity to better understand our company and our goals, as well as the local context in which we conduct our activities.


The five most innovative projects and award them a trophy, delivered by our CEO.  In 2007, during an international human resources seminar in Brussels, six corporate initiative trophies were awarded trophies in April 2005 by a jury composedto:

Veolia Energy for “Pépinière Internationale, objectif 2010”;

ST2N of company representatives and outside participants, including the press.  The jury also awarded honorable mentions to two additional projects.  The winning projects were:


·

OnyxVeolia Transport France (Triade Electronique)for “Mobi’guide”, for a project that combined re-use and recyclingthe improvement of computer wasteservice relations with disabled persons;

Veolia Transport North America for “World Class Safety”, the hiring of disadvantaged people;leader in safety measures;


·

Connex France (Société des transports publics de l’agglomération stéphanoise),SENSE (France) for its evaluation of employee skills;training program for disabled persons within the cleaning profession;


·

Veolia Water Gabon (SEEG),Eau, Veolia Propreté and Veolia Transport in France for its program to fight AIDS;


·

Proactiva Medio Ambiente Colombie,the tutorial school for its program to help waste employees acquire a diploma;


·

Dalkia Lithuania, for its management training program;


·

Onyx UK (honorable mention), for having signed a national agreement with the GMB union;young professionals coming from underprivileged neighborhoods; and


·

Tianjin CGE Water Co. Ltd, Veolia Water Force (honorable mention),– China for its humanitarian interventions.


the charitable plan aimed at destitute Chinese populations.

A compensation policy that includes social welfareassociates employee benefits and employee profit-sharing


We apply a global compensation policy, which is consistent with our company’s results and includes the following components: salary, social welfareemployee benefits and employee savings.  This policyapproach consists of:



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 61



Back to contents



·

awardingoffering competitive compensation based on the markets and countries concerned;of the relevant countries;

·

enabling employees to earn fair compensation whichthat takes into account their own personalindividual efforts;

·

strengthening social welfare benefits;employee benefits (such as illness, disability, and accidental death benefits);

·

reinforcing the pension and entitlement systems that exist in various countries; and

·

developing employee savings.



129



Back to Contents


The increase in life-expectancy and medical costs, as well as the retirement of the “baby boom” generation, will affect the public welfare systems in the long-term.  In certain countries, employers must provide medical, life insurance, and retirement coverage to their employees if the public welfare system does not.

In light of our international presence, our company must take these factors into account and be sure to:

respect local legal systems and establish complementary social welfare systems in order to guarantee high quality coverage to all of Our employees;

guarantee the competitiveness of our company by attempting to limit corporate commitments subject to the IAS 19 accounting standard;

finance savings plans with contributions from the employer and employees in order to ensure the responsibility of all parties.

As of December 31, 2007, our corporate commitments amounted to €1.9 billion, a decrease of 5% compared to the end of 2006, which is essentially due to changes in actuarial assumptions and in particular to a rise in the actualization rate. Retirement plans with defined benefits accounted for 2005 were consolidated in a vehicle created in 2004. They were evaluated at €1.57 billion, an increase of 33% over 2004. Defined benefits constituted 93%70% of this amount.  Other commitments relatedrelate to end-of-contract indemnity,end of career indemnities, senior executive retirement, medical coverage for retirees, and other work benefits.benefits and end of career compensation.   The consolidation of commitments was effectuated in 27made over more than 60 countries. Despite an increase in life expectancy and an actualization rate that was lower than actuarial assumptions, the growth in commitments between 2004 and 2005 remained contained.


In France, following the reform2007, our Group extended its policy of social security, we organized a competitive bid in June 2005 to minimize increasesemployee savings. We proposed by our insurer and maintain employee coverage at the same level. This competitive bid related to excess medical coverage for 100,000 employees working in France.  As of January 1, 2006, a new policy was implemented.


Finally, after relaunching in 2004 a policy to encourage active employee shareholding in seven countries through a group savings plan named Sequoia, we conducted a new share capital increase forto 195,515 employees that closed on December 6, 2005. There wasin 27 countries, representing approximately 33,000 more employees and 8 more countries than in 2006.   As a solid levelresult of employee participation, particularly in the eight countries (Estonia, Finland, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, Slovakiathis transaction, close to 57,000 employees are shareholders of Veolia Environnement and Slovenia) where employees were allowed to participate for the first time. 20,605 employees, or 14% of the total employees eligible across fifteen countries, participated in the 2005 capital increase.  This represents a 35% increase in participation over 2004.  The total amount of contributions to the group savings plan, or €30,529,484, increased by 41% compared to 2004. In total, nearly 40,000 employees of the group are current shareholders, owning 0.92%collectively hold 1.63% of our share capital at December 31, 2005.  


capital.

Ethics

Our presence in nearly 6570 countries around the world necessitates that werequires us to implement a set of principles for ensuringin order to ensure compliance with various human rights norms and governance standards set forth under international laws and treaties.

These principles must take into account our company’s cultural diversity and emphasize environmental protection above all, which is one of our company’s foremost concerns.  In addition, they must integrate our company’s traditional values, which are based on a close relationship with clients, consumers and civil society and the autonomy of each of our company’s operating divisions.

To this end, we implemented the “Ethics, Commitment and Responsibility” program in February 2003, which was updated in December 2004.late 2004 and early 2008. This program is intended to guide the daily behavior of our employees. As part of the program, an ethics correspondent has been appointed in each division.

The program reaffirms the fundamental values shared by all of our employees, including, for example, the need for strict observance of the laws in effect in the different countries where we operate, loyalty towardsto our clients and towardsto consumers, sustainable development, a sense of solidarity (tolerance, respect of others and social dialogue), management of risks and effective corporate governance.

In March 2004, we created an ethics committee to examine and settle any questions relating to the ethics program. The ethics committee hasconsists of three members and may pursueinvestigate any matter that it wishes regarding groupGroup ethics. Employees may also freely consult with the committee. The ethics committee must act independently with respectand keep the information relating to the matters it treats and hold the information relating thereto confidential.

From October 2004 to December 2005, weour Group held fourteen training seminars relating to the “Ethics, Commitment and Responsibility” program, including three outside of France, for over 400 groupof our managers.  During 2007, we continued these actions by developing and deploying a training program and seminars on compliance with antitrust laws, open internationally to several thousand managers of our Group.

Finally, in SeptemberIn addition, since 2005, we have implemented a reporting procedure to help combat fraud, which is overseen by our risk director and theour director of control and synergies.finance.



130



Back to Contents


SHARE OWNERSHIP

None of our directors and senior managers owns 1% or more of our shares. Our directors and senior managers as a group own less than one percent1% of our shares. As of December 31, 2005, ourOur directors and senior managers listed below were granted options to subscribe to shares of our company during the last five years as follows:

2001 PlanNumber of Options Initially Awarded(1)

Number of Shares

Exercise Price(2)

Expiration Date

Henri Proglio


208,000

€41.25(1)

February 8, 2009

Jerôme Contamine


41,600

€41.25

February 8, 2009

Antoine Frérot


41,600

€41.25

February 8, 2009

Denis Gasquet


41,600

€41.25

February 8, 2009

2002 Plan

   

Henri Proglio


220,000

37.25(2)36.65

January 28, 2010

Jerôme Contamine


65,000

37.2536.65

January 28, 2010

Antoine Frérot


45,000

37.2536.65

January 28, 2010

Denis Gasquet


45,000

37.2536.65

January 28, 2010

2003 Plan

   

Henri Proglio


220,000

22.5022.14

March 24, 2011

Jerôme Contamine


105,000

22.5022.14

March 24, 2011

Olivier Barbaroux


70,000

22.5022.14

March 24, 2011

Antoine Frérot


70,000

22.5022.14

March 24, 2011

Denis Gasquet


70,000

22.5022.14

March 24, 2011

Stéphane Richard


(3)

70,000

22.5022.14

March 24, 2011

2004 Plan

   

Henri Proglio


110,000

24.7224.32

December 24, 2012

Jerôme Contamine


70,000

24.7224.32

December 24, 2012

Eric Marie de Ficquelmont


(4)

40,000

24.7224.32

December 24, 2012

Olivier Barbaroux


40,000

24.7224.32

December 24, 2012

Antoine Frérot


40,000

24.7224.32

December 24, 2012

Denis Gasquet


40,000

24.7224.32

December 24, 2012

Stéphane Richard


40,000

24.7224.32

December 24, 2012

2006 Plan

Henri Proglio

150,000

€44.03

March 28, 2014

Jerôme Contamine

90,000

€44.03

March 28, 2014

Eric Marie de Ficquelmont

60,000

€44.03

March 28, 2014

Olivier Barbaroux

60,000

€44.03

March 28, 2014

Antoine Frérot

60,000

€44.03

March 28, 2014

Denis Gasquet

60,000

€44.03

March 28, 2014

Stéphane Richard

60,000

€44.03

March 28, 2014

2007 Plan

Henri Proglio

110,000

€57.05

July 17, 2015

Jerôme Contamine

60,000

€57.05

July 17, 2015

Olivier Barbaroux

40,000

€57.05

July 17, 2015

Antoine Frérot

40,000

€57.05

July 17, 2015

Denis Gasquet

40,000

€57.05

July 17, 2015

Alain Tchernonog

40,000

€57.05

July 17, 2015

(1)

The originalnumbers of shares which can be acquired upon the exercise price, €42, hasof options under each plan except the 2007 Plan have been adjusted to take into account transactions affecting our share capital (issue(issuance of free warrants for shares in December 2001 and a share capital increaseincreases in August 2002)2002 and July 2007).

(2)

The original exercise price, €37.53, hasprices for all plans except the 2007 Plan have been adjusted to take into account transactions affecting our share capital (issue(issuance of free warrants for shares in December 2001 and a share capital increaseincreases in August 2002)2002 and July 2007).  The original exercise prices under each plan are stated below.

(3)

Mr. Stéphane Richard is no longer a member of senior management of our company since May 31, 2007.

(4)

Eric Marie de Ficquelmont is no longer a member of senior management of our company since January 2007.



As of December 31, 2005, none of the options granted131



Back to our directors and senior managers had been exercised.Contents


Pursuant to a three-year authorization granted by our general shareholders’ meeting of June 21, 2000, our former management board decided on June 23, 2000 to implement an “outperformance” stock option program. Under the program, we granted 29 of our principal managers options to purchase 780,000 treasury shares at €32.50 per share.  The total number of treasury shares eligible for sale and the exercise price have been adjusted to 784,201735,635 shares and €31.92€31.41 per share, respectively, as a result of legal



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 62



Back to contents


adjustments related to our issue of free warrants for shares in December 2001 and a share capital increaseincreases in August 2002 and July 2007, and after subtraction of exercised options.options cancelled due to the departure of employees. Options granted pursuant to this plan will expire in June 2008. As of December 31, 2005, 10,0002007, 385,778 options had been exercised.

Pursuant to the same authorization, our former management board decided on February 8, 2001 to implement a stock option plan pursuant to which 1,500 of our employees (including 6six members of our former management board) received options to subscribe to a total of 3,462,000 newly-issued shares of our company at €42 per share, which was the fair market value of our shares at the time the options were granted.  The total number of newly-issued shares eligible for subscription and the exercise price have been adjusted to 3,526,4463,578,039 shares and €41.25€40.59 per share, respectively, as a result of the legal adjustments described above.above and after subtraction of options cancelled due to the departure of employees. Options granted pursuant to this plan will expire in February 2009.  As of December 31, 2005, none2007, 1,836,563 of these options had been exercised.

Finally, pursuant to the same authorization, our former management board decided on January 28, 2002 to implement a stock option plan pursuant to which approximately 1,400 of our employees (including 5five members of our former management board) received options to subscribe to a total of 4,413,000 newly-issued shares of our company at €37.53 per share, which was the average market price over the 20 stock exchange days immediately preceding the date of the meeting of our management board.  The total number of newly-issued shares eligible for subscription and the exercise price have been adjusted to 4,418,9594,657,903 shares and €37.25€36.65 per share, respectively, as a result of the legal adjustments described above and after subtraction of exercised options.options cancelled due to the departure of employees. Options granted pursuant to this plan will expire in January 2010. As of December 31, 2005, 120,6982007, 2,236,647 options had been exercised.

Pursuant to a new authorization granted by our general shareholders’ meeting of April 25, 2002, our former management board decided on March 24, 2003 to implement a stock option plan pursuant to which approximately 1,740 of our employees (including 6six members of our former management board) received options to subscribe to a total of 5,192,635 newly-issued shares of our company at €22.50 per share.  The total number of newly-issued shares eligible for subscription and the exercise price have been adjusted to 5,164,390 shares and €22.14 per share, respectively, as a result of the legal adjustments described above and after subtraction of options cancelled due to the departure of employees. Options granted pursuant to this plan will expire in March 2011.  As of December 31, 2005, 46,6802007, 2,784,621 options had been exercised.

Pursuant to a new authorization granted by our general shareholders’ meeting of May 12, 2004, our board of directors decided on December 24, 2004 to implement a stock option plan pursuant to which approximately 1,087 of our employees (including the seven members of our chairman and chief executive officer)committee) received options to subscribe to a total of 3,341,600 newly-issued shares of our company, corresponding to approximately 0.82% of share capital on the day the plan was authorized, which represents slightly more than half of the total amount authorized by our general shareholders’ meeting.  These options were awarded to three categories of beneficiaries:

·

Category 1: Group senior executives (including members of the executive committee), who received 32% of the options awarded;

·

Category 2: Group officers, who received 39% of the options awarded; and

·

Category 3: Group employees who distinguished themselves through exceptional performance, who received 29% of the options awarded.

The exercise price of the options was setmeeting, at €24.72 per share.  The total number of newly-issued shares eligible for subscription and the exercise price have been adjusted to 3,392,012 shares and €24.32 per share, which reflects the averagerespectively, as a result of the 20 opening share prices of a VE share in the days preceding the board of directors’ decision.  Such exercise price does not include any discount.

The board of directors also decided that all or part of the awardlegal adjustments described above and after subtraction of options cancelled due to beneficiaries falling into categories 1 or 2 above was conditioned upon our having achieved a certain levelthe departure of return on capital employed (ROCE) by the end of our 2005 fiscal year.  Accordingly, these options were to be awarded/not awarded as follows:

ROCE


% of options awarded

< 7.50%

³ 7.50% and < 8.50%

³ 8.50%

Category 1

0%

between 50% and 100%

100%

Category 2

50%

between 75% and 100%

100%


Since the ROCE calculated at December 31, 2005 was greater than 8.50% (at 9.1%), the condition for awarding all options to categories 1 and 2 above has been satisfied.e mployees. Options granted pursuant to this plan will expire in December 2012.  As of December 31, 2005, 1,3502007, 35,592 options had been exercised.

Pursuant to a new authorization granted by our general shareholders’ meeting of May 12, 2005, our board of directors decided on March 28, 2006 to implement a stock option plan pursuant to which approximately 1,378 of our employees (including the 7 members of our executive committee) will receivereceived options to subscribe to a total of 4,044,900 newly-issued shares of our company at €44.75 per share, which reflected the average opening share prices of our shares in the 20 days preceding the board of directors’ decision.  Such exercise price does not include any discount, in accordance with the general meeting’s authorization of May 12, 2005. The total number of newly-issued shares eligible for subscription and the exercise price have been adjusted to 4,110,406 shares and €44.03 per share, respectively, as a result of the legal adjustments described above and after subtraction of options cancelled due to the departure of employees.  Options granted pursuant to this plan will be exercisable from March 2010 and will expire in March 2014. As of December 31, 2007, 1,300 options had been exercised in advance due to the death of a beneficiary, in accordance with French law.



132



Back to Contents


During its meeting of March 29, 2007, following the recommendations of the nominations and compensation committee, the board of directors defined our company’s policy on incentive programs for senior executives and executives of our Group and decided that for certain categories of beneficiaries, this policy could combine the award of stock options and free shares. During its meeting of July 17, 2007, our board of Directors decided that stock options would be reserved for senior executives and that the free shares would be awarded to a large group of executives and “outstanding” non-executive employees, without combination of the two policies.  In addition, in accordance with new provisions of the French Commercial Code resulting from the law of December 30, 2006 for the development of employee shareholding, our board of directors set, as of the same date, the rules applicable to the chairman and chief executive officer’s obligation to retain all or part of his shares in registered form, which are held as a result of the exercise of options, until the end of the term of his office.   

Pursuant to a new authorization granted by our general shareholders’ meeting of May 11, 2006 relating to the issuance of undiscounted share subscription and purchase options representing up to 1% of the share capital, our board of directors decided on July 17, 2007 to implement a stock option plan pursuant to which 557 of our employees (including the members of our executive committee) received options to subscribe to a total of 2,490,400 newly-issued shares of our company, corresponding to approximately 1%0.60% of share capital on the day the plan was authorized. The exercise price of the options has been set at €44.75€57.05 per share, which reflects the average opening prices of our shares in the 20 opening share prices of a VE share in the days preceding theour board of directors’ decision.  Such exercise price does not include any discount.The total number of newly-issued shares eligible for subscription has been adjusted to 2,473,900 shares, after adjustments arising from chang es in the situations of beneficiaries.  Options granted pursuant to this plan will be exercisable from July 2011 and will expire in March 2014.July 2015.  This authorization is valid until July 11, 2008.  Pursuant to the board’s decision, options were awarded as follows:

Members of the executive committee: 330,000 options (13.2% of the total);

Category 1 (Main senior executives of our Group, excluding members of the executive committee): 811,000 options (32.6% of the total); and

Category 2 (Other senior executives of our Group): 1,349,400 options (54.2% of the total).

On July 17, 2007, our board of directors also decided that the plan would include an award to American residents of “stock appreciation rights” (SARs), which are the financial equivalents of share subscription options and replicate the exercise and performance terms of such options.  These SARs are valid for six years (compared with eight years for options) and may be exercised at the end of four years.  The exercise price of the SAR was set at € 57.20, which reflects the opening price of our shares on the date of our board of directors’ decision.  The acquisition period is identical to that of the options, that is, 4 years following the award decision.  Pursuant to our board of directors’ decision, 205,200 stock appreciation rights were awarded to 181 beneficiaries as follows:

Category 1 (Main senior executives of our Group, excluding executive committee members): 29,500 SARs (14.4% of the total)

Category 2 –(Other senior executives of our Group): 84,300 SARs (41.1% of the total)

Category 3 (Executives and “outstanding” non-executive employees): 91,400 SARs (44.5% of the total)


The acquisition of options and SARS awarded to the executive committee, as well as to categories 1 and 2 above is subject to a minimum growth of the net earnings per share (NEPS) between December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2008 according to the following rate:

 

NEPS< 10 %

NEPS >10 et <25 %

NEPS³ 25 %

Executive committee and Category 1

Percentage of award

0 %

Between 1% and 99% proportional to net earnings

100 %

Category 2

Percentage of award

50 %

Between 51% and 99% proportional to net earnings

100 %




133



Back to Contents


As in the case of the performance terms that apply to the free shares, the SARs allocated to Category 3 will be permanently acquired in the event of an increase in net earnings per share as of December 31, 2008 equal to or greater than 10% more than that as of December 31, 2006.

A resolution will be proposed to the general shareholders’ meeting to be held on May 7, 2008, concerning the grant of an authorization to our board of directors to award subscription options or share purchase options without discount to employees and/or officers of our company or its related companies for a maximum of 1% of our company’s aggregate share capital. This 26-month authorization would be valid until July 7, 2010.  In accordance with the decision of our board of directors of March 25, 2008, we will continue the stock option policy we pursued in 2007, and the acquisition of options will accordingly be partially subject to performance conditions.

 As of December 31, 2007, a total of 22,944,535 share subscription options had been granted (plans n° 2 to 7), giving the right to subscribe to 15,287,144 of our shares, after adjustments and exercises.  Of this total, 8,810,360 options were exercisable (plans n° 2 to 5).  As of December 31, 2007, the number of our shares before exercise of the remaining stock options amounted to 470,719,806 shares. On this date, if all stock options (plans n°2 to 7) had been exercised, 15,287,144 new shares would have been issued, representing a dilution percentage in case of exercise of 3.25 %.

Grant of Free Shares

During its meeting of March 29, 2007, following the recommendations of our nominations and compensation committee, our board of directors defined our policy concerning incentive plans for senior executives and executives of our Group and decided that certain categories of beneficiaries, excluding members of our executive committee were granted options to subscribe to sharesand the main senior executives of our company as follows underGroup, could receive a combined award of stock options and free shares, with the 2006 plan:acquisition of free shares subject in certain cases to performance criteria. During its meeting of July 17, 2007, our board of directors decided that free shares would be awarded to a large group of executives and “outstanding” non-executive employees, without combining the stock options and free share award policies.

2006 Plan

Number of Shares

Exercise Price

Expiration Date

Henri Proglio


150,000

€44.75

March 28, 2014

Jerôme Contamine


90,000

€44.75

March 28, 2014

Eric Marie de Ficquelmont


60,000

€44.75

March 28, 2014

Olivier Barbaroux


60,000

€44.75

March 28, 2014

Antoine Frérot


60,000

€44.75

March 28, 2014

Denis Gasquet


60,000

€44.75

March 28, 2014

Stéphane Richard


60,000

€44.75

March 28, 2014


On July 17, 2007, upon the recommendation of the nominations and compensation committee, our board of directors decided to implement a free share award plan and to allocate a total of 333,700 shares (after adjustment by the board of directors on December 19, 2007, to account for all final share grants), representing 0.07% of our share capital on the date of the resolution.  In accordance with the decision of our board of directors, the shares were awarded to 2,232 Category 3 beneficiaries (executives and “outstanding” non-executive employees) in 18 countries, including France.  This category includes executive and non-executive employees with at least three years’ seniority who have achieved remarkable individual or collective results in pursuing their specific objectives.

The acquisition period for such shares depends on the tax regime applicable.  In general, the acquisition period is set at two years for French residents (that is, until July 18, 2009), followed by a lock-up period of two years (until July 18, 2011), while residents of countries other than France are subject to an acquisition period of four years (until July 18, 2011), not followed by a lock-up period.

Free shares awarded to Category 3 beneficiaries are subject to the following performance terms:  they will be permanently acquired in the event of an increase of net earnings per share at December 31, 2008 equal to or greater than 10% more than that at December 31, 2006.

The authorization of our general shareholders’ meeting of May 10, 2007 (limited to 0.5% of our share capital), which is in effect until July 10, 2009, led to the grant in 2007 of 0.07% of our share capital on the day of the decision of our board of directors. Consequently, no new resolution shall be proposed at our general shareholders’ meeting to be held on May 7, 2008.

Company Savings Plan and Employee Share Ownership Policy

In connection with Vivendi’s gradual divestiture of its interest in our company, a group savings plan (PEG) was created inSince 2002, in order to allow our employees to transfer savings previously invested in Vivendi’s savings plan to a new savings plan established by our company. Our employees therebyhave had the possibility of investing in various instruments including monetary funds, VE shares and structured investment funds that guaranteed the preservation of capital and allowed for growth potential upon any increase in the price of VE shares.

We conducted a share capital increase in December 2002 that was reserved for employees of our French subsidiaries. Given conditions during 2003, noGroup’s savings plan, “Sequoia,” including diversified funds and an investment fund in Veolia Environnement shares.  

After a first share capital increase reserved for French employees, was conducted that year.

In 2004, we decided in 2004 to reinvigorateoffer our strategy of encouraging employee shareholding by allowing non-French as well as Frenchforeign employees to participate in the PEG, with the objective of having our employees hold at least 5% of outstanding share capital in the future.  Employees of our French subsidiaries as well as employees of subsidiaries located in 6 countries other than France thus had the possibility of investingacquiring shares in our company during reserved capital increases. The plan was progressively extended at the international level (it now covers 27 countries, including France, and 29 countries, all mechanisms combined), with the ultimate goal of employees owning 5% of our outstanding share capital.  



134



Back to Contents


Our employees have the choice of two different investment funds that hold interests in VE shares:employee shareholder plans: a “classic” fund whose value fluctuates withplan, in which the employee is exposed to variations in our share price, of VE shares, and a “secured” fund thatplan, which protects investorsthe employee from a decline in the price of VEour shares belowwhile giving him or her the originalpossibility to benefit from a portion of any increase, as applicable.

Depending on local conditions, the shares in these two plans were subscribed either directly or through French investment funds (Fonds Commun de Placement d’Entreprise - FCPEs). Additionally, specific plans were put in place in the United Kingdom (the Share Incentive Plan, which since 2006 enables employees to purchase shares of our company through a trust and pay for them through regular withdrawals from their salary) and in China (a global plan replicating the economic conditions of the secured shareholder plan) in order to accommodate local variations in tax and exchange rate regulations.

A review of subscription price. The share capitalin 2007 indicates a high level of participation: out of the 216,153 current or retired employees eligible (all mechanisms included), 44,373 (or 20.53%) subscribed, resulting in a 43% increase effected on December 6, 2004in total contributions compared to 2006, of which 41,308 were towards our Group’s saving plan.   This subscription resulted in the issuance of 1,351,4683,061,675 new shares and a corresponding increase in our company’s share capital of 6,757,340 euros.

€15,308,375.   In 2005, an identicaladdition, 188,771 new shares (representing 0.04% of our share capital) were issued following a capital increase reserved for Sequoia Souscription International – SAR, a subsidiary of Calyon, as part of the establishment of a structured offer was made to nearly 150,000 employees in 15 countries. 20,605 current or former employees decided to participate, resulting in a 35% increase in total contributions compared to 2004. Accordingly, the sharecountries where traditional employee shareholder plans are not available.  These two capital increase effectedincreases were finalized on December 6, 2005 resulted in the issuance of 1,281,928 new shares and a corresponding increase in our share capital of 6,409,640 euros.

Currently, given12, 2007.  Giv en the share capital increases that occurred in 2002, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2005, nearly 40,000 group2007, approximately 57,000 employees own 0.92% of our Group currently own a total of 1.63% of Veolia Environnement’s share capital.  In total, approximately 56,00076,000 employees have active accounts in our PEG,i.e.,Sequoia savings plan, that is, more than 1 in 3one out of every three employees in the fifteen countries in which the PEGour Group’s savings plan is available.




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 63135



Back to contentsContents


ITEM 7: MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS

The table below shows the ownership of our shares and voting rights at December 31, 2005:2007:

Shareholder

Number of shares

Percentage ofshare capital

Number of voting rights

Percentage of voting rights

Number of shares

Percentage of share capital

Number of voting rights

Percentage of voting rights

Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations(1)

35,843,657

8.79%

35,843,657

9.15%

48,763,596

10.36%

48,763,596

10.70%

Capital Research and Management Company(2)

37,054,050

9.08%

33,994,950

8.67%

Groupe Groupama(3)

23,614,705

5.79%

23,614,705

6.03%

Vivendi(4)

21,522,776

5.28%

21,522,776

5.49%

Capital Research Global Investors(2)

32,438,090

6.89%

32,438,090

7.12%

Groupama(3)

27,171,816

5.77%

27,171,816

5.96%

Natixis Asset Management(4)

21,227,870

4.51%

21,227,870

4.66%

EDF(5)

16,255,492

3.99%

16,255,492

4.15%

18,287,428

3.88%

18,287,428

4.01%

Veolia Environnement(6)

15,990,242

3.92%

-

-

15,120,654

3.21%

0

0%

Public and other investors

257,591,684

63.15%

260,650,784

66.51%

307,710,352

65.37%

307,710,352

67.54%

Total*

407,872,606

100%

391,882,364

100%

*

Capital at March 9, 2006, after declaration by the board of directors on such date of a share capital increase through issuance of 73,920 new shares following exercise of subscription options, as well as 3 new shares following exercise of subscription warrants.

(1)

According to our shareholder analysis of December 31, 2005, using Euroclear data. To the best of our knowledge, Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations’ (“CDC”) most recent filing with French market authorities occurred on January 3, 2005. In its filing of April 23, 2003 with French market authorities, CDC declared that it was acting as a medium-term institutional investor and that it retained the right to purchase additional shares based on market conditions, but that it did not intend to assume control of our company.

(2)

Capital Research and Management Company (“Capital Research”) is a management company acting on behalf of its clients (U.S. mutual funds). Estimate of share ownership is based on Capital Research’s Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on December 30, 2005, in which it declared that it held 37,054,050 shares and 33,994,950 voting rights. On May 10, 2006, Capital Research filed an amendment to its Schedule 13G with the SEC, in which it declared that it held 41,503,250 shares and 38,444,150 voting rights as of April 28, 2006.

(3)

According to our shareholder analysis of December 31, 2005, using Euroclear data. To the best of our knowledge, Groupe Groupama’s most recent filing with French market authorities occurred on December 30, 2004.

(4)

According to the register of our registered shareholders (actionnaires au nominatif) as of February 28, 2006, which was prepared on our behalf by Société Générale. To the best of our knowledge, Vivendi’s most recent filing with French market authorities occurred on December 30, 2004.

(5)

According to the register of our registered shareholders (actionnaires au nominatif) as of February 28, 2006, which was prepared on our behalf by Société Générale. To the best of our knowledge, EDF’s last share ownership filing with French market authorities occurred on December 30, 2002, in which EDF declared that it held 16,155,492 shares as of that date. EDF further declared that it would hold the shares as a financial investment, that it did not seek to influence our company’s management and that it would exercise its voting rights with the sole aim of enhancing the value of its investment.

(6)

As set forth in our monthly filing with French market authorities of transactions that we have effected with respect to our own shares, filed with the AMF on March 3, 2006.

Total

470,719,806

100%

455,599,152

100%

(1)

According to our company’s shareholder analysis of December 31, 2007. To our company’s knowledge, Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations’ most recent filing with the AMF occurred on December 19, 2006 (Décision et Information AMF no. 206C2344 dated December 22, 2006). The Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations declared that it was acting alone and that it may purchase additional shares based on market conditions, but that it did not intend to take control over our company.

(2)

An investment division of asset management corporation Capital Research and Management Company, acting on behalf of its clients (American mutual funds). According to Capital Research Global Investors’ most recent filing with the SEC on Schedule 13G dated February 11, 2008, reporting its ownership of our shares as of December 31, 2007. To our company’s knowledge, Capital Research and Management Company’s most recent filing with the AMF occurred on January 9, 2007 (Décision et Information AMF n°207C0072 dated January 10, 2007).

(3)

According to Company’s shareholder analysis of December 31, 2007. To our company’s knowledge, Groupama’s most recent filing with the AMF occurred on December 30, 2004 (Décision et Information AMF n°205C0030 dated January 7, 2005).

(4)

According to our company’s shareholder analysis of December 31, 2007.

(5)

According to our company’s shareholder register (actionnaires nominatifs) as of December 31, 2007, which is maintained by Société Générale on our company’s behalf. To our company’s knowledge, EDF’s most recent filing with the AMF occurred on December 22, 2002 (Euronext avis n°2002-4424 dated December 31, 2002). EDF declared that it held 16,155,492 Veolia Environnement shares as of that date. EDF further declared that it would hold the shares as a financial investment and that it did not seek to influence our company’s management, and that it would exercise its voting rights with the sole aim of enhancing the value of its investment.

(6)

As set forth in our company’s monthly filing with the AMF reporting transactions it has effected with respect to its own shares, filed with the AMF on January 4, 2008.

(1)

According to our company’s shareholder analysis of December 31, 2007. To our company’s knowledge, Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations’ most recent filing with the AMF occurred on December 19, 2006 (Décision et Information AMF no. 206C2344 dated December 22, 2006). The Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations declared that it was acting alone and that it may purchase additional shares based on market conditions, but that it did not intend to take control over our company.

(2)

An investment division of asset management corporation Capital Research and Management Company, acting on behalf of its clients (American mutual funds). According to Capital Research Global Investors’ most recent filing with the SEC on Schedule 13G dated February 11, 2008, reporting its ownership of our shares as of December 31, 2007. To our company’s knowledge, Capital Research and Management Company’s most recent filing with the AMF occurred on January 9, 2007 (Décision et Information AMF n°207C0072 dated January 10, 2007).

(3)

According to Company’s shareholder analysis of December 31, 2007. To our company’s knowledge, Groupama’s most recent filing with the AMF occurred on December 30, 2004 (Décision et Information AMF n°205C0030 dated January 7, 2005).

(4)

According to our company’s shareholder analysis of December 31, 2007.

(5)

According to our company’s shareholder register (actionnaires nominatifs) as of December 31, 2007, which is maintained by Société Générale on our company’s behalf. To our company’s knowledge, EDF’s most recent filing with the AMF occurred on December 22, 2002 (Euronext avis n°2002-4424 dated December 31, 2002). EDF declared that it held 16,155,492 Veolia Environnement shares as of that date. EDF further declared that it would hold the shares as a financial investment and that it did not seek to influence our company’s management, and that it would exercise its voting rights with the sole aim of enhancing the value of its investment.

(6)

As set forth in our company’s monthly filing with the AMF reporting transactions it has effected with respect to its own shares, filed with the AMF on January 4, 2008.



To the best of our knowledge, no person other than those listed above directly or indirectly held 5% or more of our shares or voting rights asAs of December 31, 2005. No major shareholder has different voting rights than2007, non-French investors held approximately 53% of our other shareholders, except by virtue ofcompany’s shares and French investors the large number of shares each may hold.   remaining 47%.

We estimate that, as of December 31, 2005,2007, approximately 83,895,754124 million of our shares (representing approximately 23%26% of our share capital) were held by holders in the United States.  As of December 31, 2005, 2,773,1172007, 17,355,455 of our shares (representing approximately 0.7%3.69% of our share capital) were held in the form of ADRs by 1328 registered ADR holders (including The Depository Trust Company).  We estimate that, as of March 24, 2006,31, 2008, there were approximately 14,45027,400 beneficial holders of our shares in the United States.

The following table shows the evolution of the ownership of our shares over the past three years:

 

As of December 31, 2003(1)

As of December 31, 2004(2)

As of December 31, 2005(3)

Shareholders

Number of shares

% of capital

% of voting rights

Number of shares

% of capital

% of voting rights

Number of shares

% of capital

% of voting rights

Vivendi

82,486,072

20.36%

20.83%

21,523,527

5.30%

5.52%

21,522,776

5.28%

5.49%

Our Company

9,195,942

2.27%

-

16,183,548

3.98%

-

15,990,242

3.92%

-

Public and other investors

313,388,501

77.37%

79.17%

368,714,908

90.72%

94.48%

370,359,588

90.80%

94.51%

Total

405,070,515

100%

100%

406,421,983

100%

100%

407,872,606

100%

100%

(1)

As of December 31, 2003, French investors held approximately 72.9% of our shares (and foreign investors the remaining 27.1%), our directors and senior managers did not hold a material percentage of our shares and shareholders holding more than 5% of our share capital were Vivendi, Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations, Groupama and JPMorgan Chase Bank (on behalf of its clients).

(2)

As of December 31, 2004, French investors held approximately 70.55% of our shares (and foreign investors the remaining 29.45%), our directors and senior managers did not hold a material percentage of our shares and shareholders holding more than 5% of our share capital were Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations, Groupe Société Générale, Groupe Groupama and Vivendi.

(3)

As of December 31, 2005, French investors held approximately 61.18% of our shares (and foreign investors the remaining 38.82%), our directors and senior managers did not hold a material percentage of our shares and shareholders holding more than 5% of our share capital were those indicated in the first table set forth above.


Prior toOn July 2000, our company was10, 2007, we completed a wholly-owned subsidiary of Vivendi.  In July 2000, Vivendi’s interest in our company was reduced to approximately 72.3% as a result of a global offering of our shares and the conversion of our convertible bonds into our shares.   

In December 2001, Vivendi sold an additional block of our shares representing 9.3% of our total share capital in an over-the-counter transaction, reducing its interest in our company to approximately 63%.

In July 2002, we conducted a share capital increase through the issuancein cash with maintenance of preferential subscription rights, towhich had been approved by our shareholders.  This share capital increase was recordedboard of directors on August 2, 2002. Pursuant to the terms of an agreement dated June 24, 2002, several financial investors, whom we refer to as the Group of Declared Investors (GID), acquired and exercised the preferential subscription rights granted to Vivendi and subscribed for the remainder of our shares not subscribed by the public.  The GID consisted of the Caisses des Dépôts et Consignations, Groupama, BNP Paribas, AGF, Société Générale, Dexia, Caisses d’Epargne, Crédit Lyonnais and Natexis Banques Populaires.10, 2007.  Following the transaction, the GID held 9.4%51,941,040 new shares with a nominal value of our share capital.

On November 24, 2002, Vivendi, our company,€5 were issued, thus increasing the GID and a group of new investors, whom we refer to as the New Investors, signed an addendum to the June 24, 2002 agreement pursuant to which Vivendi sold to the New Investors and to our company a total of 82,486,072 of our shares (of which 3,624,844  were sold to our company, representing approximately 0.9% of our share capital atby €259,705,200.  The total amount of the time of sale) on December 24, 2002.  Our company andcapital increase, including the New Investors also received, for each share purchased, a call option that was exercisable at any time between December 24, 2002 and December 23, 2004 inclusive, entitling the holder thereofissuance premium, amounted to purchase one of our shares at a price of €26.50 per share. On the date that these call options expired,i.e. December 23, 2004, none had been exercised.  The New Investors were EDF, Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations, Groupama SA, AXA, Compag nie d’Investissement de Paris SAS, Eurazeo, Aurélec, Dexia Crédit Local, Caisse Nationale des Caisses d’Epargne, Assurances Générales de France Holding, CNP-Assurances, Crédit Agricole Indosuez (Suisse) SA (for its own account and the account of a client), CIC, Generali, Crédit Lyonnais, Médéric Prévoyance and Wasserstein Family Trust LLC.€2,581,469,688.  



136



Back to Contents


On December 31, 2002,12, 2007, we recorded the completion ofan increase in share capital attributable to (i) a share capital increase reserved for current and retired employees of our company and our group,Group, in France and abroad, the subscription of which had been initiated on June 27, 2002.  The shares were subscribed for by the FCPE SEQUOIA acting as intermediary on behalf of beneficiaries.  Following this transaction, 1,183,158 new shares (nominal



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 64



Back to contents


value 13.5 euros per share) were subscribed for atwas achieved both directly and through several company investment funds, and (ii) a price of 26.5 euros per share, causing share capital to increase by 15,972,633 euros and representing approximately 1.28% of our existing share capital.

On December 6, 2004, we recorded the completion of a share capital increase reserved for Sequoia Souscription International – SAR, a subsidiary of Calyon, in the context of the implementation of a structured share offer for employees from countries unable to participate in traditional employee shareholder plans.  Following the transaction, 3,250,446 new shares with a nominal value of €5 were subscribed at the prices of €48.18 and €60.23 (depending on the plan), thus increasing the share capital by €16,252,230, representing approximately 0.7% of our company and our group, which had been approved by the board of directors on September 16, 2004.  The shares were subscribed for by several employee investment funds acting as intermediary on behalf of beneficiaries.  Following this transaction, 1,351,468 new shares (nominal value 5 euros per share) were subscribed for at a price of 18.71 euros per share, causingcompany’s share capital to increase by 6,757,340 euros and representing approximately 0.33% of our existing share capital.

On December 8 and December 9, 2004, Vivendi reduced its shareholding in our company by a total of 15% of share capital, reducing its interest from 20.36% of share capital to only 5.3%.  Vivendi reduced its holdings through (i) a private placement to investors involving 10% of share capital, (ii) a sale to Société Générale involving 3% of share capital, and (iii) a sale to our company involving 2% of share capital, which closed on December 29, 2004.

On December 6, 2005, we recordedat the completion of adate the share capital increase reserved for employees of our company and our group, which had been approved by the board of directors on September 15, 2005.  The shares were subscribed for by several employee investment funds acting as intermediary on behalf of beneficiaries.  Following this transaction, 1,281,928 new shares (nominal value 5 euros per share) were subscribed for at a price of 28.11 euros per share, causing share capital to increase by 6,409,640 euros and representing approximately 0.3% of our share capital at such date.was record ed.

To our knowledge, there are no shareholders’ or other agreements relating to our shares other than as described above.above and there is no arrangement the execution of which may at a subsequent date result in a change of control of our company.

The major shareholders of our company do not enjoy different voting rights from those of the other shareholders.



137



Back to Contents



RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Electricité de France (EDF)

UnderWe have no “related-party transactions” within the termsmeaning of a partnership agreement signedItem 7B of Form 20-F.  We have disclosed certain transactions in December 2000, EDF held a call option enabling it to increase its investment in Dalkia to 50%, provided that a number of conditions were met.

The conditions of this option were clarified in an amendment to the agreement signed by EDF and our company on April 19, 2005. This amendment stated in particular that EDF had until July 31, 2005 to exercise this option and that the option would only be considered definitively exercised at the date of conclusion by the parties of a formal agreement covering in particular the reorganization of their relationship under their industrial and commercial agreement and their rights and obligations under the shareholders’ agreement, including governance rules. This formal agreement had to be concluded by September 30, 2005 at the latest.

In this context, EDF exercised its call option on July 28, 2005 as a precautionary measure. However, in the absence of a formal agreement covering amendmentsNote 40 to our industrial and commercial agreement andconsolidated financial statements pursuant to a definition of “related-party transactions” under IFRS that is different from the shareholders’ agreement, the option became null and void asdefinition contained in Item 7B of October 1, 2005. Assuming that no other EDF competitor takes control of our company, EDF no longer holds any call options in respect of Dalkia and its subsidiaries.Form 20-F.  



The original partnership agreement remains unchanged, and we and EDF have confirmed our intention138



Back to work together to take advantage of any new opportunities in the European energy market.Contents

Outstanding Loan

In 1997, one of our affiliates granted a personal loan to one of its employees. This employee later became an executive vice president of our company. As of December 31, 2005, the amount outstanding under this loan was approximately €412,881 (including principal and accrued interest), bearing interest at a rate of 5% per year.  


ITEM 8: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Please refer to the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto in Item 18.

Litigation

We are involved from time to time in various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of our business.  The most significant litigation involving our company or its subsidiaries is described below. Other than as described below, we do not believethere are no other current or threatened legal, governmental or arbitral proceedings involving our company or its subsidiaries that any ofeither had during the legal proceedings in which we are currently involvedpast twelve months or that may in the ordinary course of our business willfuture have a material adverse effect on ourthe results of operations liquidity or financial condition.condition of our company or the group.

As of December 31, 2007, the aggregate amount of our provisions for litigation was €426.9 million including all types of litigation (that is, tax, employee-related and other litigation).  The aggregate amount of reserves accrued by our group in respect of all litigation in which we or our subsidiaries are involved (see Note 17 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 18 of this annual report), includes a large number of claims and proceedings that, individually, are not material to our businesses.  The largest individual reserve accrued in our financial statements in 2007 relating to litigation amounts to approximately €19 million.

Veolia Eau – Compagnie Générale des Eaux


On February 27, 2001, the French Competition Council (Conseil de la concurrence)notified Veolia Eau -- Compagnie Générale des Eaux of a complaint alleging that several joint ventures that it had formed with other water services companies affected the level of competition in the market.  On July 11, 2002, the Council rejected the allegations of anticompetitive cooperationcollusion (entente anticoncurrentielle) among thethese water services companies, in question and refusedrefusing both to impose monetary sanctions or issue an injunction against these companies. However, the Council found that the existence of the joint ventures constituted a “collective dominant position” in the market and requested the French Ministry of the Economy, Finance and Industry to take all necessary measures to modify complete or terminate thethis pooling of means arrangement of these companies through their join t ventures. Veolia Eau --arrangement. Compagnie Générale des Eaux contestedchallenged this finding, initially before the Paris Court of Appeals, which upheldconfirmed the Council’s position. However, the commercial section of the French Supreme Court (Cour de cassation), in a decision dated July 12, 2004, invalidatedoverturned the Paris Court of Appeals’ decision, and foundholding that only administrative authorities had jurisdiction over the matter. Accordingly, Veolia Eau -- Compagnie Générale des Eaux challenged the Council’s finding before the FrenchConseil d’Etat.  The latter refused to hearheld that the complaint at this stagewas inadmissible (decision of November 7, 2005), since it found that the Council’s decision was only a preparatory act for later action bythe decision of the French Ministry of Economy, Finance and Industry. In light of the nature of the litigationthis matter and the lack of any judgment against usour company thus far, we have not accrued a reserve for its potential outcome.


On February 15, 2006, the company Aquatraitements Energies Services (AES)(“AES”) brought a complaint before the Commercial Court of Paris (Tribunal de Commerce de Paris) relating to two of Veolia Water’sEau’s subsidiaries (Veolia Water and Seureca Overseas, together, the “Subsidiaries”)Overseas). AES is seeking €150 million in damages and interest from the Subsidiaries,Veolia Water and Seureca Overseas, based on itsthe  claim that it lost potential consulting fees following Veolia Water’s decision not to participate in a public bid tender launched by the authorities of Abu Dhabi for the construction of a seawater treatment facility. On June 2, 2004, the SubsidiariesVeolia Water and Seureca Overseas had signed two consulting contracts with AES, pursuant to which AES was supposed to provide consulting advice on commercial strategy and public relations. Under the terms of the contracts, AES would receive fees based on the amount of the marketcontract won by oneb y either Veolia Water or bot h SubsidiariesSeureca Overseas as a result of AES’ assistance. In December 2004, the SubsidiariesVeolia Water and Seureca Overseas terminated these contracts following their discovery of actions taken by the managers of AES managers that they considered to be fraudulent (dolosives), and that would have affected their ability to consent to the contracts at the time of signing. The SubsidiariesVeolia Water and Seureca Overseas submitted their defense rejecting all of AES’s claims before the Commercial Court on June 28, 2006. After several months of silence, AES filed its brief in response before the Commercial Court in which, in light of the arguments developed by Veolia Water and Seureca Overseas in their brief of June 28, 2006, AES reduced its damages claim to €15 million. Veolia Water and Seureca Overseas filed another brief in response before the Commercial Court on September 5, 2007, to which AES responded on February 20, 2008 reconfirming its claim. Consequently, the end of the procedural dispute is near and tr ial on the merits should take place in the next several months. A judgment is likely to be rendered before the end of 2008. We believe that AES’AES’s allegations and in particular, its €15 million damages claim, hashave no legal or economic merit and intend to defend themselves vigorously. We believe that such litigation will not have a material adverse effect on ourthe financial condition of our Group, and accordingly have not accrued a reserve in respect of the potential outcome.



139



Back to Contents


Sade

In April 2000, Sade, a subsidiary of Veolia Water,Eau, and 40 other companies received notice from the French Competition Council of a complaint alleging anticompetitive agreements  (entente anticoncurrentielle) among these companies in respect of public bids for 44 public sector construction contracts in the Ile-de-France region (which includes Paris and its suburbs).  These companies, including Sade, filed answerstheir responses to the complaint in September 2000.  The Council filed a supplemental complaint in November 2001, which replaced its original complaint and reduced the number of construction contracts subject to scrutiny.  The companies filed an answerresponses to the new complaint in January 2002.  However, on October 26, 2004, the Council filed a second supplemental complaint, the stated objective of which was to clarify and supplement the information contained in the earlier complaints.  In response to athe report received in August 2005, Sade filed a response in October 2005 that contested the Council’s complaint



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 65



Back to contents


on the merits (in particular the lack of proof of the alleged anticompetitive behavior by Sade in certain markets) andas well as based on the basis of irregularities in the complaint procedure that affectedundermined its right to a proper defense, as well as the lack of defense. However, onproof of Sade’s alleged anti-competitive behavior in certain markets.  On March 21, 2006, the Council retained complaints against Sade in respect of 2 markets, and imposed a fine of €5.4 million relating to this matter. Sade has accrued a reserve in its accounts to cover this litigation, and on June 16, 2006 filed an appeal withappealed this decision before the Paris Court of Appeals on June 16, 2006. Hearings took place on March 26 and 27, 2008.  The Paris Court of the Council’s decision.Appeals is currently deliberating..

In addition, on June 9, 2005 the French Competition Council issued a ruling against eleven companies (including Sade) in respect of a complaint alleging anticompetitive behavior in respect of public bids(providing information prior to the bid process) for various public works contracts in the Meuse department from 1996 to 1998. Sade was implicated with respect to one such contract, which was awarded to a competitor in 1998.  Under this ruling, Sade was fined €5 million, which it has already paid. Sade laterhas filed an appeal with the Paris Court of Appeals, which upheldconfirmed the French Competition Council’s ruling in a decision datedon April 25, 2006. OnSade appealed this decision before the French Supreme Court  on May 24, 2006, Sade filed a further2006.  On November 6, 2007, the French Supreme Court rejected this appeal, against this ruling.ending the case.

OTV

At the end of 1993, NOSS, a consortium led by Northwest Water International Limited in which Veolia Water participates through its subsidiary Omnium de Traitement et Valorisation, or OTV, won a contract to build a water treatment facility and a wastewater collection network in the city of Bangkok pursuant to an offer made in a public tender held in 1992.  The value of the contract at the time was 150 million pounds sterling and required 38 months of public works. Because of numerous difficulties encountered with Bangkok municipal authorities (including, for example, restrictions on access to key sites and modifications of project specifications) and the failure to agree on compensation during the ensuing discussions, NOSS terminated the contract on March 6, 1998 and commenced an arbitration proceeding for damages. The Bangkok municipal authorities rescinded the contract in June 1999 and drew on th e project guarantees, which were partially paid by the issuer banks. In addition, all related outsourcing contracts were terminated by mutual consent, except for a contract with Euro Iseki Limited, or EIOL, which commenced its own arbitration proceeding against NOSS.  The dispute between EIOL and NOSS has been settled, at no cost to OTV. Regarding the claim against the city of Bangkok, we do not expect that a final award will be rendered in this proceeding for several years, as arbitrators are still in the process of being appointed.  Although OTV is jointly and severally liable with the other members of the NOSS consortium in respect of any monetary damages that may be awarded to the other parties in these proceedings, it does not believe, given the current stance taken by the city of Bangkok, that this litigation will have a material adverse effect on our company.  Nevertheless, OTV has accrued a reserve for its potential outcome.

In addition, on June 7, 2005, the French General Direction for Consumers, Competition and the Prevention of Fraud, or DGCCRF, and the Brigade for the Prevention of Economic Delinquency, or BRDE, visited OTV France’s regional office in Colombes. Investigators searched for evidence of possible anti-competitive practices in four construction markets between 1998 and 2000. At this time, the investigators interviewed several of OTV’s employees and confiscated various commercial documents.  Two managers of the OTV Group were also interviewed and placed under judicial supervision. At this stage of the investigation, we are unable to evaluate the possible legal and financial consequences, and accordingly have not accrued a reserve for the potential outcome.

Water Applications & Systems CorporationWASCO and Aqua Alliance International


Several present and former indirect subsidiaries of Veolia WaterEau in the United States91 are defendants in lawsuits in the United States in which the plaintiffs seek to recover for personal injury and other damages for alleged exposure to asbestos, silica and other potentially harmful substances. RegardingWith respect to the lawsuits against Veolia Water’sEau’s former subsidiaries, certain of Veolia Water’sEau’s current subsidiaries have retained all liability relating theretoremain liable and are sometimes involved inat times must manage the managementoutcomes of such lawsuits. Further,claims.  In addition, the purchasersacquirors of Veolia Water’sEau’s former subsidiaries in somecertain instances benefit from guarantees given by Veolia WaterEau or by usVeolia Environnement in respect of the outcome of such lawsuits.  These lawsuits typically allege that the plaintiffs’ injuries resulted from the use of products manufactured or sold by Veolia Water’sEau’s present or former subsidiaries or their predece ssors.predecessors.  There are generallyge nerally numerous other defendants, in addition to Veolia Water’sEau’s present or former subsidiaries, which allegedlyare accused of having contributed to the claimed injuries. Reserves have been accrued by Veolia Water’s presentEau’s current subsidiaries for their estimated liability in these cases based on, a number of assumptions, includingamong other things, the nexus between the injuries claimed injuries and the products manufactured or sold by Veolia Water’sEau’s subsidiaries or their predecessors, the extent of the injuries allegedly sustained by the plaintiffs, the involvement of other defendants and the settlement history in similar cases.  These reserves are accrued at the time such liabilities arebecome probable and reasonably estimable, and do not include reserves for possible liabilities in respect of unasserted claims.  Circumstances that might affect the reliability and precision of these reserves include the difficulty of determining the cause, extent and impact of alleged injuries, the potential for successive groups of plaint iffs to emerge and the diversity of the individual plaintiffs’ circumstances.  Our historical experience leads us to believe that the amounts that we accrue are typically paid out, depending on the type of claim, over a period of two to five years.  While we believe that our reserve accruals are reasonable in light of the facts of which we are aware, we cannot assure you that they will be adequate to cover future settlements, judgments or costs in respect of currently outstanding claims, or any liability to which Veolia Water and its subsidiaries might be subject in respect of additional claims that might be brought in the future.

A number of such claims have been resolved to date either through settlement or dismissal.  To date, none of thesethe claims has been tried to a verdict.  

During the five-year period ended December 31, 2005,2007, our company’s average annual costs relating to these claims, including amounts paid to plaintiffs and legal fees, have been approximately US$32.5 million, net ofexcluding any reimbursements by insurance companies. Although it is possible that these expenses may increase in the future, costs might increase, we currently have no reason to believe that any material increase is likely to occur, nor do we expect these claims to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operation.operations.

1  Subsidiaries of the Aqua Alliance group, or of WASCO (formerly named Water Applications & Systems Corporation and United States Filter Corporation), the leading company of the former U.S. Filter group, the major businesses of which were sold to various acquirors in 2003 and 2004.



140



Back to Contents


Veolia Water North America Operating Services


In 2002, Veolia Water North America Operating Services (“VWNAOS”), a subsidiary of our company, entered into a ten-year contract with the city of Atlanta, representing annual revenues of US$10 million. This contract involves the operation of slurry and effluent treatment plants for the city, the maintenance and renovation of equipment engineering of equipment and the design and planning of a construction program for plant renovation. On June 19, 2006, VWNAOS brought an action against the city of Atlanta before the United States District Court, alleging the city’s failure to respect its investment obligations, reimburse additional costs of operation and pay bills issued in consideration for services provided.  VWNAOS estimates its damages to be at least US$25 million, excluding damages resulting from further adjustments which may arise over the course of the procedure.  On July 10, 2006, the city of Atlanta unilaterally cancelled the contract and, in turn, brought an action against VWNAOS, alleging VWNAOS’ failure to fulfill certain of its obligations during the execution of the contract.  The city is seeking indemnities of approximately US$35 million against VWNAOS and has also brought an action against Veolia Environnement directly in its capacity as VWNAOS’s guarantor under the contract.  In connection with this dispute, the city has drawn on the US$9.5 million bank guarantee issued to VWNAOS at the start of the contract.  VWNAOS believes this move is unjustifiable.  A discovery procedure allowing each party to request documents from the other began on September 1, 2006 and is ongoing.  We contest the city’s claims and intends to defend ourselves vigorously.   A trial date has not yet been set by the District Court.  At this point in the procedure, we believe that this matter will not have a significant impact on our fi nancial situation.

In April 2008, two of our subsidiaries, Veolia Water North America Operating Services and Veolia Water Indianapolis, LLC (VWI), were named as defendants in two putative class action lawsuits filed in Indiana state courts, in which the plaintiffs have alleged that the meter-reading practices used by VWI for Indianapolis customers were inconsistent with VWI’s contract with the local water authority and state consumer protection law.  The plaintiffs have claimed that VWI billed customers on the basis of estimates of water usage, rather than actual usage, more frequently than the contract permitted, resulting in overcharges that, while later credited to the customers, deprived the customers of their money for a period of time.  They have also claimed that the methodology used to estimate water usage was flawed and not approved under relevant regulations.  The plaintiffs are seeking to c ertify a class of similarly situated residential water customers. VWI believes that its billing and meter reading practices complied with its contract and relevant laws and regulations, and that the claims of the plaintiffs are without merit.  It intends to defend its interests vigorously.  While the early stage of these lawsuits makes it impossible to determine the potential loss, we believe that these lawsuits will not materially and adversely affect our results of operations, liquidity or financial position.  

Veolia Transport

On November 27,

In 1998, the DGCCRF (a French General Direction for Consumers, Competition and the Prevention of Fraud, or DGCCRF, obtained an order from a French court authorizing it to performadministrative body with competition oversight) conducted an inspection and performed seizures on the premises of our transportation subsidiary Connex (now Veolia Transport) and other companies in the public transportation market, with the objectivepurpose of obtaining elements of proof relating to possible anti-competitive practices in this market. The DGCCRF proceeded to perform these inspections and seizures in 1998.In February 2003, Veolia Transport was informed in February 2003 that the French Ministry of Economy, Finance and Industry had requested the French Competition Council to render a decision on the merits in this matter on the merits.matter.  In September 2003, the French Competition Council notified Veolia Transport of two grievances that raised the possibility, between 1994 and 1999, ofsuggested collusion among operators which might have had the effect of limiting competition at the local and national level in the public transportation market relating to urban, inter-urban and school services.services between 1994 and 1999. In September 2004, the French Competition Council notified Veolia Transport of additional grievances alleging the existence of an anticompetitive agreement (entente anticoncurrentielle) at the European Union level. In January 2005, the judge advocate (rapporteur) of the French Competition Council transmitted his conclusions, in which a part of one of the grievancessub-claims was dropped.  

dismissed. On July 5, 2005, the French Competition Council issued a decision in which it partially validated the findings of the public authorities, and ordered Veolia Transport to pay a fine of approximately €5 million. Veolia Transport paid this fine and filed an appeal, which the Paris Court of Appeals rejected on February 7, 2006. On March 7, 2006, Veolia Transport filed an appeal with a higher court.

the French Supreme Court. The French Supreme Court approved certain arguments advanced by Veolia Propreté

Following a fire that started on July 25, 1997Transport and, in a landfill operated by Onyx Méditerranée, a subsidiary of Veolia Propreté, in Septèmes-les-Vallons, inits decision dated October 9, 2007, overturned the south of France, Onyx Méditerranée was ordered under a May 6, 2003 judgment of the criminal court (tribunal correctionnel)of Aix-en-Provence, and under a December 17, 2003 decision of the Court of AppealAppeals of Aix-en-Provence,Paris and resubmitted the claim to paythe same court. &nb sp;This decision has not yet been served to the parties, and Veolia Transport has yet to submit an appeal to that court.



141



Back to Contents


Société Nationale Maritime Corse Méditerranée (SNCM)

Our affiliate SNCM is involved in a €100,000 finenumber of legal proceedings relating directly and indirectly to the bidding process for contracts to provide ferry service between Marseille and Corsica.  Veolia Transport owns 28% of SNCM’s share capital, and we fully consolidate SNCM in our consolidated financial statements as a result of control rights under a shareholders’ agreement.

The first legal proceeding involves SNCM’s direct and indirect shareholding in Compagnie Méridionale de Navigation (CMN).  SNCM holds directly 45% of CMN’s share capital.  It also holds a 45% interest in Compagnie Méridionale de Participation (CMP), which in turn holds 53% of CMN’s share capital.  SNCM entered into a shareholders’ agreement with the other shareholder of CMP, STIM of Orbigny (Stef Tfe group), which, among other things, gave either party the right to trigger a purchase or sale option involving CMP shares in the event of a modification of CMN’s strategy by the other party that results in a major conflict between the shareholders. SNCM notified STIM in July 2006 that it was exercising its option to purchase 25% of the share capital of the CMP (to bring SNCM’s interest to 70%), as a result of a disagreement that impeded the ability of t he parties to submit a joint bid for the involuntary destruction of property.  The sanction was amnestied after paymentMarseille-Corsica ferry contract.  

STIM contested both the validity of the fine. Furthermore,agreement and the tribunal orderedright of SNCM to exercise its option.  As required by the shareholders’ agreement, SNCM brought an expert reviewaction against STIM before the Commercial Court of Paris (Tribunal de Commerce), which ruled in respectfavor of SNCM in October 2006.  In December 2006, the Paris Court of Appeals reversed the decision, holding that STIM had validly cancelled the agreement because of its indefinite duration (a condition that ordinarily permits a party to cancel a contract under French law).  SNCM appealed the decision to the French Supreme Court, which dismissed SNCM’s claim in November 2007.  The case is now closed.  SNCM will maintain its current stake in CMN.  

On September 19, 2006, CMN and Corsica Ferries filed a complaint before the Competition Council alleging anti-competitive practices by SNCM, the Corsican Regional Authority (Collectivité Territoriale Corse) and the Corsican Transportation Bureau (l’Office des Transports Corse) intended to restrict or eliminate competition during the call for tenders for the Marseille-Corsica public transport delegation contract. In December 2006, the Competition Council held that the cartel claim against the Corsican Regional Authority, the Corsican Transportation Bureau and SNCM was inadmissible, and rejected claims regarding the excessive subsidies and crossed subsidies raised by Corsica Ferries. On the other hand, the Competition Council found that the global and indivisible offer of the SNCM likely constituted an abuse of its dominant position. The case on the merits is pending, although it relates to a call for tenders that was cancelled by a decision of the Conseil d’Etat in December 2006.

In February 2007, notwithstanding the dispute among the CMN shareholders, SNCM submitted a joint bid with CMN for five ferry routes between Marseille and Corsica.   The joint bid was contested by Corsica Ferries, a competitor, before a French administrative court and the French Competition Council.  

Before the Competition Council, Corsica Ferries contended that the CMN – SNCM grouping forms an anti-competitive cartel based on an unlawful pooling arrangement, and that the size of the subsidy requested by the grouping from the Corsican Regional Authority suggested an abuse of a dominant position. The Competition Council dismissed Corsica Ferries’ claims for indemnification brought by civil parties relating primarilyconcerning pooling arrangements in April 2007.  Proceedings with respect to the deteriorationclaim of woods and plantations. The claimsexcessive subsidy are underway, but the Competition Council’s investigation has been suspended pending a decision on the merits.  As of the remaining plaintiffs in respectdate of this litigation have been evaluatedannual report, it is impossible to determine what the outcome of this matter before the Competition Council might be.  

The initial bid process was delayed by administrative court proceedings, ending in a decision by the court-appointed expert, and amount to approximately €3.6 million. We beli eve that such litigation will not haveConseil d’Etat (the highest French administrative court) in December 2006.  Following this decision, the Corsican Regional Authority launched a material adverse effect on our financial condition, and accordingly have not accruedsecond bid process.  Corsica Ferries contested this process in a reserve in respectsummary proceeding, but its position was rejected by a decision of the potential outcome.Conseil d’Etat in June 2007.  The contract was subsequently awarded to the CMN / SNCM group, and service began on July 1, 2007.  In January 2008, the administrative court of Bastia dismissed Corsica Ferries’ request for the cancellation of the decision of the Corsican Regional Authority to launch a new bid process.  Corsica Ferry has not appealed this decision.



142



Back to Contents


Proactiva

On September 22, 1999 and February 10, 2000, several lawsuits were filed in the Commonwealth Court in Arecibo, Puerto Rico (transferred to San Juan, following the decision ofas ordered by the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico) against, among others, Compañía de Aguas de Puerto Rico or CAPR.(CAPR). CAPR was a subsidiary of Aqua Alliance until 2000, when it was transferred to Proactiva, our joint venture with FCC. The complaints allege that CAPR operated (until June 2002) a wastewater treatment facility in Barceloneta, Puerto Rico, thatwhich emitted offensive odors and hazardous substances into the environment, which damageddamaging the health of the plaintiffs, a group of local residents.  On August 11, 2003,Following several hearings and procedural steps in the context of a mediation process under the authority of a judge appointed by the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, overturned the parties reached an amicable agreement on August 15, 2007. This settlement agreement provi des that certain defendants, other than CAPR, will pay the plaintiffs in consideration for the complete release of their legal claims, and subject to the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico’s resolution of certain procedural details. Accordingly, the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico issued a provisional order ofon August 30, 2007, and on November 6, 2007 it issued a decision formally acknowledging the court of first instance authorizing the consolidation of the lawsuits of the different plaintiffs, leaving this question open to further debate.  The lawsuit i s currently in the preliminary stage of determining damages and responsibility. Concurrently, a mediation proceeding commenced on May 28, 2003, at the request of the court and all parties, in order to find a complete solutionAugust 2007 settlement agreement. Further to this litigation. This mediation proceeding has not yet resulted in a specific proposal.

9 These include subsidiaries of Aqua Alliance and subsidiaries of Water Applications & Systems Corporation (formerly known as United States Filter Corporation), the holding company of the former USFilter group the majority of the activities of whichformal acknowledgement, all claims against CAPR were sold to different purchasers in 2003 and 2004.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 66



Back to contents


Total damages sought against all defendants currently amount to approximately US$300 million. In light of the state of advancement of these two proceedings, we have not accrued a reserve for the potential outcome of this litigation.

See Note 19 to our consolidated financial statements for the aggregate amount of reserves accrued by our company in respect of all litigation, including tax claims, in which we or our subsidiaries are involved.  These reserves cover the losses that we believe are probable as a result of all types of litigation in which we are involved in the course of our business, including a large number of claims and proceedings that, individually, are not material to our business.  The largest individual reserve accrued in our financial statements relating to litigationdropped without CAPR having paid any amounts to approximately €12 million.the plaintiffs or the defendants.

Dividend Policy

Subject to the approval of our shareholders and applicable provisions of the French commercial code and our articles of association, we currently intend to pay dividends in the future asOur company’s dividend policy is determined by theour board of directors, and approved by our shareholders. The payment and amount of any future dividends will depend onwhich may consider a number of factors, including our financial performance and net income, general business conditionsas well as the dividends paid by other French and international companies in the same sector. We cannot guarantee the amount of dividends that may be paid in respect of any fiscal year. However, we have announced and confirmed that our business plansobjective is to maintain our policy of distributing dividends of between 50 and investment policies. See “Item 10. Additional Information — Memorandum and Articles60% of Association — Rights, Preferences and Restrictions Applicableadjusted net income attributable to Our Ordinary Shares — Dividends” and “Item 3. Key Information — Selected Financial Data — Dividends.”equity holders of the parent.

SIGNIFICANT CHANGES

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our discussion of the evolution of our business, our financial condition, our results of operations and a comparison of our operating results and financial condition in preceding periods included in “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.” It contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those described under “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors.” Our results may differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements.

Since the date of our consolidated financial statements, we have pursued our strategic goals to increase organic growth, obtain new contracts and enter into new partnerships and alliances.  The following are the most significant developments in our businesses since December 31, 2005.2007.  

General

On February 5, 2008, we published our consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2007 (unaudited IFRS figures), which amounted to €32,628.2 million. We also submitted our quarterly financial information as at December 31, 2007 to the AMF and released it to the public.

On March 7, 2008, we published a press release regarding our annual results for 2007.

On February 12, 2008, we announced the launch of the “Veolia Observatory of Urban Lifestyles”. Having worked with various cities for over 150 years, we are able to anticipate the complexity of urban problems and their interrelation so as to offer essential services that improve the quality of urban life. By 2030, 60% of the world population will be living in cities. We created the “Veolia Observatory of Urban Lifestyles” to enhance our knowledge of city life. The Observatory published the findings of its first study, which was carried out by Ipsos, the French market research institute, between September and December 2007. The study examines the relationship between city dwellers and the place where they live. A total of 8,500 people were surveyed in 14 cities around the world. The detailed findings of this survey can be found in a brochure published by the “Veolia Observatory o f Urban Lifestyles”. The survey will be carried out again in 2009 using a new group of major cities around the world.

On May 6, 2008, we published a press release regarding our 2008 first quarter revenue.

General

143



Back to Contents


Veolia Eau

On February 15, 2006, we conducted an issuance11, 2008, Veolia Eau announced that it had won, via its subsidiary Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies, a contract in a consortium including Warbud, the Polish civil engineering company, and WTE, the German water company, to upgrade and extend the Czajka wastewater treatment plant in Warsaw, Poland. The contract will provide estimated total cumulative revenues of €300€500 million under our euro medium-term note (EMTN) program,for the consortium, of which bears interest at 3-month Euribor plus a margin equalapproximately €148 million will go to 0.06%, and matures in February 2008.

At the end of March 2006, we reached an agreement with noteholders (primarily U.S. investors) in respectVeolia Eau. This contract is part of a private placement of notes that we madelarger development project in the U.S.countries in 2003 (see Note 20Eastern Europe, which have a significant need to the consolidated financial statements).renew their purification infrastructures. This agreement resultedcontract will allow Veolia Water, which already has a strong presence in this part of Europe, and particularly in the modificationCzech Republic, Romania, Hungary and Slovakia, to reinforce its presence in Poland.

On April 29, 2008, Veolia Eau announced that it won, through its subsidiary Veolia Water AMI, a six-year contract awarded by Saudi Arabia’s Ministry of certain financial covenants (in particular coverage ratios) containedWater and Electricity for water production and distribution and wastewater collection in the capital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. This is the first time Saudi Arabia awards a contract for water services to a private operator, and it is also one of the most important contracts in terms of the notes,number of people served (4.5 million inhabitants) and in connection with our transition from French GAAPthe length of the drinking water network (10,000 kilometers), as well as wastewater (4,500 kilometers) that has been entrusted to IFRS.Veolia Eau. The contract represents estimated aggregate revenues of €40 million.

Veolia WaterPropreté

DuringThe acquisition of Bartin Recycling Group, the first quarterthird company in France for recycling and reuse of scrap iron and metals, which generated €249 million revenues in 2006, was finalized on February 13, 2008. This acquisition will increase Veolia Water pursued further commercial developmentPropreté’s metal recycling capacity in Europe, Asia and the Middle East.France from 250,000 to more than one million tons per year, which is a significant gain considering that 50% of steel worldwide is produced from scrap iron.

In January 2006,February 2008, Veolia Water wonPropreté entered into a 25-yearsignifcant twenty five-year Private Finance Initiative agreement in Southwark County, U.K. The agreement represents estimated global revenues of €900 million, thanks to a global integrated management strategy which proposes the reduction, collection, reception, transfer, recycling, composting, pretreatment and disposal of waste.

On March 17, 2008, the district authorities of West Berkshire awarded to Veolia Propreté a Private Finance Initiative contract to manage waterfor integrated waste management with a twenty-five year term, representing total aggregate estimated revenues of €667 million.  The contract covers the collection, recycling and wastewater serviceselimination of waste from the district as well as client relationsurban cleaning services.  Veolia Propreté will build and manage the installations for the upgrade, transfer, composting and recycling of household waste.

Dalkia

On February 18, 2008, Dalkia announced the success of the public tender offer launched on December 17, 2007 for the Polish company Praterm.  Dalkia is now the majority shareholder of the company, holding 97.9% of its share capital for an investment of €142 million.  With more than 260 km of small and medium sized networks, Praterm is present in 21 cities in the regionNorth, South, and Southeast of Prostejov in Central Moravia (70,000 inhabitants). This contract represents estimated total cumulative revenue of €132 million. Veolia Water also signed a partnership contract with a subsidiary of Sinopec, China's leading oil refiner. Under this 25-year agreement, Veolia WaterPoland.  It produces and Sinopec Corp. Beijing Yanshan PetroChemicals (BYP) will set up an equally-owned joint venturedistributes heat to operate facilities to collect, treatnearly 520,000 inhabitants and recycle industrial wastewater at BYP’s site at Yanshan, located 50 kilometers southwest of Beijing.

At the beginning of February 2006, the Emirate of Ajman awarded Veolia Water a contract to manage the wastewater services of its capital, Ajman (population of 235,000), via the Moalajah operating company. Veolia Water owns two-thirds of Moalajah, while one-third is owned by Besix, its Belgian partner. The 27-year contract is expected to generate total cumulative revenue for Veolia Water of approximately €187€55 million over the contract term.

On April 10, 2006, we sold our interest in Southern Water to Southern Water Capital Limited, the current majority shareholder in Southern Water.  We had come to the conclusion that our minority interest (with a maximum of 25% for regulatory reasons) did not allow us to optimize our investment.

In April 2006, Veolia Water was awarded the contract for the turnkey supply of a new seawater desalination plant in Bahrain. The contract, worth US$336 million (approximately €275 million), was won following an international call for tenders. The new plant will commence operations in April 2007.

In May 2006, Veolia Water won the first two international tenders issued by local authorities in Slovakia.  The contracts cover the provision of water services in the center of Slovakia (the Banska Bystrica district) and in the north of the country (the Poprad district). The first contract was awarded by the Banska Bystrica water company (StVS), the public company that covers the central region of Slovakia. The contract covers water production and distribution, wastewater collection and treatment and customer relations. The 30-year contract represents expected annual revenue of €43 million, for a cumulative total of approximately €1.3 billion over the contract period. The second contract was awarded by the Poprad water company (PVS), the operating company that manages the water and wastewater services for the city and region of Poprad in northern Slovakia.  This contract also cove rs water production and distribution, wastewater collection and treatment and customer relations, and has a 30-year contract term.  It represents expected annual revenue of €17 million, for a cumulative total of approximately €550 million over the contract period.

Finally, in June 2006, Veolia Water North America announced that it had been awarded a contract to design, build and operate a wastewater treatment plant for Rockland County in the State of New York (U.S.). This is the first design, build and operate contract for a greenfield wastewater treatment plant awarded in this state. The contract is expected to generate total revenues of nearly €35 million (US$45 million) over the contract period.2008.

Veolia Environmental ServicesTransport

In January 2008, the urban and suburban bus transportation agreement in Las Vegas was renewed for a two-year term. This agreement, the operation of which will begin in April 2008, represents cumulative estimated revenues of approximately €137 million. The SNPE Grouprenewal of the Boston agreement in 2007 and of the Las Vegas agreement in 2008 constitute major successes for Veolia Environmental Services (in particular SARP Industries) announced that they had created PyrotechnisTransport, these two agreements being the most significant in Northern America in their respective markets in terms of revenues.

Since January a start-up2008, Veolia Transport Sweden has held two thirds of the share capital of the company that will offer new services for demilitarization and soil remediation. Pyrotechnis’ primary missions will be destroying date-expired pyrotechnics such as unexploded munitions, powder residue, distress rockets and various explosive chemicals.

In addition, sinceTagia, the market for household packaging waste collectionmanager of the Stockholm metro.  This company, the remaining capital of which is no longer reserved solely to divisions accreditedowned by Eco-Emballages, Veolia Environmental Services is now positioning itselfStorstockholms Lokaltrafik AB (SL), the company overseeing the public transport system in this market and thereby expanding its “recycling” business. By taking advantagethe Stockholm region, generated revenues of a new accreditation, called Schedule D, that now authorizes packaging waste collection, Veolia Environmental Services has won four “guaranteed pickup” contracts for packaging wasteapproximately €75 million in Ile-de-France, awarded by several inter-district waste treatment associations. The four contracts total roughly 6,250 metric tons of recycled raw material.2007.

On May 15, 2006,February 20, 2008, Veolia Environmental Services announced the purchase of Biffa Belgium for €45 million.  Biffa Belgium, until nowCargo, a subsidiary of Severn Trent, isVeolia Transport specialized in railway logistics, announced the fourth largest company active in the Belgian waste market, with revenuesexecution of approximately €85.5 million.

Veolia Energy Services (Dalkia)

Dalkia has established a presence in Canada through the signing of a partnershipan agreement on February 14, 2006 with Gaz Metro Plus. The partners are setting up a joint venture company called “CDH Solutions & Operations” to develop and operate district heating and cooling networks in Canada. Gaz Metro Plus will contribute its subsidiary CCUM (Climatisation et Chauffage Urbain de Montréal)relating to the joint ventureacquisition of Rail4Chem, a German railway company whichspecialized in international railway freight transport.  Rail4Chem generated revenues in 2007 of more than €80 million.  This acquisition will be operated by Dalkia. CDH Solutions & Operations will seekfinalized during 2008, subject to generate an estimated annual turnoverthe approval of €150 million within three years.  the competition authorities.

Energy prices are expected to remain elevated during 2006.  Within this context, Dalkia expects to further develop its services that seek to improve energy efficiency and to pursue its ongoing management strategy.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 67144



Back to contentsContents


Veolia Transportation

At the beginning of January 2006, Veolia Transportation acquired Shuttleport in the United States.  Shuttleport provides airport shuttle services, and is in charge of managing transport at the airports of Phoenix, Washington (Dulles), Fort Lauderdale, Saint Louis, San José and San Francisco in particular.  The acquisition price was approximately €35 million.

In connection with the development of its activities in Central and Eastern Europe, Veolia Transportation signed a contract with EBRD in December 2005 for the latter to acquire a 35% interest in the holding company that manages activities in this region. The holding company will conduct a share capital increase in order to allow EBRD to acquire its stake. This transaction is subject to the approval of the Bundeskartellamt.

In March 2006, Veolia Transportation North America, a subsidiary of Veolia Transportation, won the contract for the urban and adapted transport system of Orange County, California. The 5-year contract will come into force on July 1, 2006, representing cumulative revenues of approximately $170 million, with 620 employees and 350 vehicles. Veolia Transportation North America was also awarded the contract for an urban and adapted transport system in Mesa, Arizona. The 8-year contract, which has already come into effect, represents cumulative revenues of approximately $180 million, with 400 employees and 200 vehicles.

Finally, on May 31, 2006, Butler Capital Partners, Veolia Transportation and CGMF signed agreements on the takeover of the Société Nationale Maritime Corse Méditerranée (SNCM), a state owned company providing ferry services mainly between mainland France and Corsica. The agreements form part of a turnaround plan that was first decided on by the French government at the beginning of 2005. The agreements and finalization of the transaction remain subject to the approval of the European Commission under rules governing state aid. SNCM’s share capital is expected to break down as follows by the end of 2006: Butler Capital Partners (38%), Veolia Transportation (28%), French government (25%) and SNCM employees (9%). Veolia Transportation has developed ferry services for several years in Scandinavian countries, and expects SNCM to generate new growth opportunities in the Mediterranean basin.


ITEM 9: THE OFFER AND LISTING

TRADING MARKETS

Our ordinary shares are listed on the Eurolist of Euronext Paris market (Compartment A). Since August 8, 2001, our shares have been included in the CAC 40, the main index published by Euronext Paris. Our shares have been listed on Thethe New York Stock Exchange in the form of American Depositary Shares (“ADSs”) since October 5, 2001. Each ADS represents one ordinary share.

The EurolistEuronext Paris market

In February 2005, Euronext Paris overhauled its listing structure by implementing the Eurolist market, a new single regulated market, which has replaced the regulated markets formerly operated by Euronext Paris,i.e., the Bourse de Paris (which comprised thePremier Marché and theSecond Marché) and theNouveau Marché. As part of this process, Euronext Paris transferred on February 21, 2005 all shares and bonds listed on thePremier Marché,Second Marché andNouveau Marché onto the Eurolist market.

As from February 21, 2005, all securities approved for listing by Euronext Paris are traded on the Eurolist market.market, which was renamed the Euronext Paris market on November 28, 2007. The EurolistEuronext Paris market is a regulated market operated and managed by Euronext Paris, a market operator (entreprise de marché) responsible for the admission of securities and the supervision of trading in listed securities. Euronext Paris publishes a daily official price list that includes price information on listed securities. Securities listed on the EurolistEuronext Paris market are classified by alphabetical order. In addition, Euronext Paris created the following compartments for classification purposes: Compartment A, for issuers whose market capitalization is over €1 billion, Compartment B, for issuers whose market capitalization is between €150 million and €1 billion, and Compartment C, for issuers whose market capitalization is under €150 million.

Trading on the EurolistEuronext Paris market

Securities listed on the Eurolist market of Euronext Paris market are officially traded through authorized financial institutions that are members of Euronext Paris. Euronext Paris places securities listed on the EurolistEuronext Paris market in one of two categories, depending on their trading volume. Our shares trade in the category known as “Continuous,” which includes the most actively traded securities. Securities in the “Continuous” category are traded on each trading day from 9:00 a.m. to 5:25 p.m. (Paris time), with a pre-opening session from 7:15 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and a post-closing session from 5:25 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. (during which times trades are recorded but not executed until, respectively, the opening auction at 9:00 a.m. and the closing auction at 5:30 p.m.). In addition, from 5:30 p.m. to 5:40 p.m., trading can take place at the closing auction price. Trading in a security after 5:40 p.m .p.m. until the beginning of the pre-opening session of the following trading day may take place at a price that must be within the last auction price plus or minus 1%. Euronext Paris has introduced continuous electronic trading during trading hours for most listed securities.

Euronext Paris automatically restricts trading in a security listed on the EurolistEuronext Paris market in the “Continuous” category upon entry of an order in the order book that is likely to result in a trade being executed at a price exceeding the specific price limits defined by its regulations. In particular, trading is automatically restricted in a security whose quoted price varies by more than 10.0% from the last price determined in an auction or by more than 2.0% from the last traded price. Trading of this security resumes after a call phase of four minutes, during which orders are entered in the central order book but not executed, which ends by an auction. Euronext Paris may also suspend trading of a security listed on the EurolistEuronext Paris market in other limited circumstances (suspension de la cotation), in particular to prevent or halt disorderly market conditions. In addition, in exceptional c ases,cases, including, for example, in the context of a takeover bid, Euronext Paris may also suspend trading of the security concerned, upon request of the AMF.

Trades of securities listed on the EurolistEuronext Paris market are settled on a cash basis on the third day following the trade. Market intermediaries are also permitted to offer investors a deferred settlement service (service à règlement différé) for a fee. The deferred settlement service is only available for trades in securities that have both a total market capitalization of at least €1 billion and a daily average volume of trades of at least €1 million. Investors can elect on the determination date (jour de liquidation), which is the fifth trading day before the end of the month, either to settle by the last trading day of the month or to pay an additional fee and postpone the settlement decision to the determination date of the following month. Our shares are currently eligible for the deferred settlement service.



145



Back to Contents


Equity securities traded on a deferred settlement basis are considered to have been transferred only after they have been registered in the purchaser’s account. Under French securities regulations, any sale of a security traded on a deferred settlement basis during the month of a dividend payment is deemed to occur after the dividend has been paid. If the sale takes place before, but during the month of, a dividend payment date, the purchaser’s account will be credited with an amount equal to the dividend paid and the seller’s account will be debited by the same amount.

Trading by Veolia Environnement in its Shares

Under French law, a company may not issue shares to itself, but it may purchase its own shares in the limited cases described in “Item 10. Additional Information — Memorandum and Articles of Association — Trading in Our Own Shares.”



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 68



Back to contents


Trading History

The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the reported high and low sales prices (in euro) and the trading volume (in shares) of our shares on the Eurolist of Euronext Paris.Paris market.

High

Low

Trading Volume(1)

High

Low

Trading
Volume(1)

————

————

————

————

2006

  

May

49.45

42.35

52,511,763

April

48.73

44.93

33,794,778

  

2008

  

First Quarter

46.40

37.82

97,080,563

63.89

42.00

183,500,344

March

46.40

43.21

36,690,010

58.29

42.00

85,760,030

February

46.19

40.96

28,812,681

59.84

53.29

41,083,180

January

41.75

37.82

31,675,272

63.89

48.81

56,657,134

2007

  

Fourth Quarter

66.25

59.19

114,698,053

December

65.85

60.07

35,155,979

November

66.25

59.88

47,353,819

October

62.95

59.19

32,188,255

Third Quarter

60.96

50.62

141,437,296

Second Quarter

63.09

55.30

135,372,389

First Quarter

57.10

50.60

99,535,891

2006

  

Fourth Quarter

58.40

46.12

97,560,487

Third Quarter

48.69

42.71

119,763,237

Second Quarter

49.45

36.49

150,220,240

First Quarter

46.40

37.82

97,080,563

2005

    

Fourth Quarter

39.14

33.80

98,720,710

39.14

33.80

98,720,710

December

39.14

36.26

27,207,376

Third Quarter

35.40

29.56

102,226,963

35.40

29.56

102,226,960

Second Quarter

31.82

27.17

110,251,403

31.82

27.17

110,251,403

First Quarter

28.42

25.21

122,493,492

28.42

25.21

122,493,492

2004

    

Fourth Quarter

26.63

23.11

107,660,963

26.63

23.11

107,660,963

Third Quarter

23.54

21.02

83,118,617

23.54

21.02

83,118,617

Second Quarter

23.69

21.06

94,359,760

23.69

21.06

94,359,760

First Quarter

24.56

21.30

96,749,828

24.56

21.30

96,749,828

2003

    

Fourth Quarter

21.78

18.08

109,232,584

21.78

18.08

109,232,584

Third Quarter

19.79

16.00

99,705,921

19.79

16.00

99,705,921

Second Quarter

20.28

14.58

119,016,453

20.28

14.58

119,016,453

First Quarter

24.93

14.40

93,519,693

24.93

14.40

93,519,693

2002

  

Fourth Quarter

25.99

20.09

63,023,202

Third Quarter

31.25

17.18

111,250,501

Second Quarter

39.10

27.00

136,136,840

First Quarter

39.20

33.55

57,297,156

2001

  

Fourth Quarter

44.50

36.10

120,996,762

Third Quarter

51.25

40.00

40,825,017

Second Quarter

51.40

46.91

25,040,547

First Quarter

50.25

38.50

55,241,583

Source: Euronext Paris

(1)

Regarding trading volume, a new definition was adopted by Euronext Paris in May 2003 in order to harmonize practices across Euronext’s various local trading markets. For Euronext data provided before this date, trading volume included transactions conducted in the over-the-counter market. Since May 2003, market trading activity as defined by Euronext Paris includes transactions conducted on the NSC system, regulated off-market transactions and transactions involving option trading on Monep, but does not include transactions conducted in the over-the-counter market. Trading volumes after May 2003 may therefore be lower than those recorded under Euronext Paris’ former definition of market trading activity.

Source: Euronext Paris

(1)

Regarding trading volume, a new definition was adopted by Euronext Paris in May 2003 in order to harmonize practices across Euronext’s various local trading markets. For Euronext data provided before this date, trading volume included transactions conducted in the over-the-counter market. Since May 2003, market trading activity as defined by Euronext Paris includes transactions conducted on the NSC system, regulated off-market transactions and transactions involving option trading on Monep, but does not include transactions conducted in the over-the-counter market. Trading volumes after May 2003 may therefore be lower than those recorded under Euronext Paris’ former definition of market trading activity.

Source: Euronext Paris

(1)

Regarding trading volume, a new definition was adopted by Euronext Paris in May 2003 in order to harmonize practices across Euronext’s various local trading markets. For Euronext data provided before this date, trading volume included transactions conducted in the over-the-counter market. Since May 2003, market trading activity as defined by Euronext Paris includes transactions conducted on the NSC system, regulated off-market transactions and transactions involving option trading on Monep, but does not include transactions conducted in the over-the-counter market. Trading volumes after May 2003 may therefore be lower than those recorded under Euronext Paris’ former definition of market trading activity.



146



Back to Contents


Trading On The New York Stock Exchange

The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the reported high and low sales prices (in U.S. dollars) and the trading volume (in ADSs) of our ADSs on Thethe New York Stock Exchange.

High

Low

Trading Volume

High

Low

Trading
Volume(1)

————

————

————

————

————

————

2006

   

May

62.70

54.91

1,336,400

April

60.50

55.15

896,200

   

2008

   

First Quarter

56.40

46.15

2,069,500

94.42

64.85

12,454,400

March

56.40

52.00

1,029,400

86.98

64.85

6,087,300

February

54.35

48.67

634,900

90.27

77.56

2,919,100

January

51.04

46.15

405,200

94.42

72.88

3,448,000

2007

   

Fourth Quarter

96.61

84.25

5,382,300

December

96.61

86.15

1,553,200

November

96.07

88.15

1,996,700

October

91.02

84.25

1,832,400

Third Quarter

86.64

67.11

6,771,700

Second Quarter

86.14

74.88

4,336,700

First Quarter

74.91

67.00

4,014,770

2006

   

Fourth Quarter

75.87

58.00

3,134,600

Third Quarter

61.61

48.80

4,751,000

Second Quarter

62.70

46.14

4,357,400

First Quarter

56.40

46.15

2,069,500

2005

      

Fourth Quarter

46.43

40.70

982,900

46.43

40.70

982,900

December

46.43

42.57

326,800

Third Quarter

43.45

35.75

729,500

43.45

35.75

729,500

Second Quarter

39.65

35.24

1,340,600

39.65

35.24

1,340,600

First Quarter

36.46

33.07

682,700

36.46

33.07

682,700

2004

      

Fourth Quarter

36.45

28.95

584,100

36.45

28.95

584,100

Third Quarter

29.07

25.65

219,500

29.07

25.65

219,500

Second Quarter

28.77

25.05

559,400

28.77

25.05

559,400

First Quarter

31.25

26.79

873,900

31.25

26.79

873,900

2003

      

Fourth Quarter

27.45

20.65

984,697

27.45

20.65

984,697

Third Quarter

23.19

18.30

1,070,478

23.19

18.30

1,070,478

Second Quarter

23.42

16.00

352,079

23.42

16.00

352,079

First Quarter

26.08

16.04

660,990

26.08

16.04

660,990

2002

   

Fourth Quarter

25.48

20.90

615,272

Third Quarter

30.60

18.10

420,278

Second Quarter

34.20

28.11

243,778

First Quarter

34.20

29.53

128,785

2001

   

Fourth Quarter (from October 5)

39.45

32.40

294,495

Source: Bank of New York

Source: Bank of New York and New York Stock Exchange

(1)

Regarding trading volume, since September 2006, we have relied on data published by the New York Stock Exchange (accessible on the New York Stock Exchange’s website (www.nyse.com)). Prior to September 2006, we relied on data published by the Bank of New York, which included off-market transactions. As a result, the trading volume data set forth in the table above may vary slightly depending on the source.

Source: Bank of New York and New York Stock Exchange

(1)

Regarding trading volume, since September 2006, we have relied on data published by the New York Stock Exchange (accessible on the New York Stock Exchange’s website (www.nyse.com)). Prior to September 2006, we relied on data published by the Bank of New York, which included off-market transactions. As a result, the trading volume data set forth in the table above may vary slightly depending on the source.


We urge you to obtain current market quotations.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 69147



Back to contentsContents


ITEM 10: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION

Objects and Purposes

Under our Article 3 of ourstatuts, our corporate purpose, directly or indirectly, in France and in all other countries, is:

·

the conduct of service activities relating to the environment on behalf of private, professional or public customers, specifically in the areas of water, wastewater treatment, energy, transportation and waste management;environmental services;

·

the acquisition and exercise of all patents, licenses, trademarks and designs relating directly or indirectly to our operations;

·

the acquisition of interests (whether in the form of shares, bonds or other securities) in existing or future companies, through subscription, purchase, contribution, exchange or any other means, together with the ability to subsequently transfer such interests; and

·

generally, the entering into of all commercial, industrial, financial, real estate or other transactions relating directly or indirectly to the above-mentioned corporate purposes, and, in particular, the ability to issue any guarantee, first-demand guarantee, surety or other security in favor of any group, undertaking or company in which we hold an interest in connection with our activities, as well as the ability to finance or refinance any of our activities.

Directors

Ourstatuts provide that each of our directors must own at least 750 of our shares in registered form.  The French commercial code provides that each director is eligible for reappointment upon the expiration of his or her term of office.

Under the French commercial code, any transaction directly or indirectly between a company and a member of its board of directors that cannot be reasonably considered to be inis not made under normal conditions within the ordinary course of business of the company is subject to the prior consent of the disinterested members of the board of director’s prior consent.directors.  Any such transaction concluded without thesuch prior consent of the board of directors can be nullified if it causes prejudice to the company. The interested director can be held liable on this basis. The statutory auditor must be informed of the transaction within one month following its conclusion and must prepare a report to be submitted to the shareholders for approval at their next meeting. At the shareholders’ meeting, the interested director may not vote on the resolution approving the transaction, nor may his or her shares be taken into account in determining the outcome of the vote or whether a quorum isi s present. In the event the transaction is not ratified by the shareholders at a shareholders’ meeting, it will remain enforceable by third parties against the company, but the company may in turn hold the interested director and, in some circumstances, other members of the board of directors, liable for any damages it may suffer as a result. In addition, the transaction may be cancelled if it is fraudulent. In the case of significant transactions with directors that can be considered made under normal conditions and within the company’s ordinary course of business, the interested director must provide a copy of the governing agreement to the chairman of the board of directors, who must informprovide a list of such agreements and their purposes to the members of the board and the statutory auditor of the principal terms of each such transaction.auditor. Moreover, certain transactions between a corporation and one of its directors who is a natural person are prohibited under the French commercial code.  code: in particular, French law prohibits loans from a company to its directors.  

Fees and other compensation paid to our directors are determined by the general shareholders’ meetings.  The board of directors may allocate the total sum authorized by the general shareholders’ meeting among its members at its discretion.  French law prohibits loans fromIn addition, the board of directors may allocate exceptional compensation to directors on a case-by-case basis for specific assignments.

Under our company to ourstatuts, after each annual shareholders’ meeting, the number of directors aged 70 or older may not exceed one-third of the total number of directors.

Transactions with Major Shareholders

The limitations imposed by the French commercial code on transactions between a company and interested directors, described in the preceding paragraph, also apply to transactions between a company and a holder of shares carrying 10% or more of its voting power (or, if such shareholder is a legal entity, the entity’s parent, if any) and to transactions between companies with common directors or executive officers.



148



Back to Contents


Rights, Preferences and Restrictions Applicable to Our Ordinary Shares

Dividends

Dividends on our shares are distributed to shareholderspro rata. The dividend payment date is decided by the shareholders at an ordinary general meeting. Under the French commercial code, we must pay any dividends within nine months of the end of our fiscal year unless otherwise authorized by court order. Subject to certain conditions, our board of directors can determine the distribution of interim dividends during the course of the fiscal year, but in any case before the approval of the annual financial statements by the annual ordinary general meeting of shareholders. Dividends on shares that are not claimed within five years of the date of declared payment revert to the French State.

Voting Rights

Each of our shares carries the right to cast one vote in shareholder elections.our shareholders’ meetings.

Liquidation Rights

If our company is liquidated, any assets remaining after payment of our debts, liquidation expenses and all of our remaining obligations will be distributed first to repay in full the nominal value of our shares. Any surplus will be distributedpro rata among shareholders in proportion to the nominal value of their shareholdings.

Preferential Subscription Rights

Under the French commercial code, if we issue additional shares, or any equity securities or other specific kinds of additional securities carrying a right, directly or indirectly, to purchase equity securities issued by our company for cash, current shareholders will have preferential subscription rights to these securities on a pro rata basis. These preferential rights will require us to give priority treatment to those shareholders over other persons wishing to subscribe for the securities. The rights entitle the individual or entity that holds them to subscribe to an issue of any securities that may increase our share capital by means of a cash payment or a set-off of cash debts. Preferential subscription rights are transferable during the subscription period relating to a particular offering. These rights may also be listed on Euronext Paris. A two-thirds majority of our shares entitled to vote at an extraordinary general meeting may vote to waive preferential subscription rights with respect to any particular offering. French law requires a company’s governing board and independent auditors to present reports that specifically address any proposal to waive preferential subscription rights. In the event of a waiver, the issue of securities must be completed within the period prescribed by law. The shareholders may also decide at an extraordinary general meeting to give the existing shareholders a non-transferable priority right to subscribe for the new securities during a limited period of time. Shareholders may also waive their own preferential subscription rights with respect to any particular offering.

Limitation on Exercise of Rights

Ourstatutsprovide that any time it is necessary to own several shares in order to exercise a specific right or to meet the requirements of a transaction affecting our share capital or equity, a shareholder that holds a number of our shares that is lower than the required number may only exercise this right or participate in this transaction if it obtains the required number of shares.

Amendments to Rights of Holders

Rights of a given class of shareholders can be amended only by action of an extraordinary general meeting of the class of shareholders affected. Two-thirds of the shares of the affected class voting either in person or by mail or proxy must approve any proposal to amend shareholder rights. The quorum requirements for a special meeting are 50%one third of the voting shares, or 25%one fifth upon resumption of an adjourned meeting.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 70



Back to contents


Ordinary and Extraordinary Meetings

In accordance with the French commercial code, there are two types of general shareholders’ meetings: ordinary and extraordinary.



149



Back to Contents


Ordinary general meetings of shareholders are required for matters that are not specifically reserved by law to extraordinary general meetings, such as:

·

approval of our company’s consolidated and unconsolidated annual financial statements;

·

electing, replacing and removing members of the board of directors;

·

appointing independentstatutory auditors; and

·

declaring dividends or authorizing dividends to be paid in shares.

Extraordinary general meetings of shareholders are required for approval of matters such as amendments to ourstatuts, including any amendment required in connection with extraordinary corporate actions. Extraordinary corporate actions include:

·

changing our company’s name or corporate purpose;

·

increasing or decreasing our share capital;

·

creating a new class of equity securities;

·

authorizing the issuance of investment certificates or convertible or exchangeable securities;

·

establishing any other rights to equity securities;

·

selling or transferring substantially all of our assets; and

·

the voluntary liquidation of our company.

Convening Shareholders’ Meetings

The French commercial code requires our board of directors to convene an annual ordinary general meeting of shareholders to approve our annual financial statements. This meeting must be held within six months of the end of each fiscal year. This period may be extended by an order of the President of the French commercial court (Tribunal de Commerce).  The board of directors may also convene an ordinary or extraordinary meeting of shareholders upon proper notice at any time during the year. If the board of directors fails to convene a shareholders’ meeting, our independent auditors or a court-appointed agent may call the meeting. Anyany of the following may requestcall the court to appoint an agent:meeting:

·

our statutory auditors

a court-appointed agent, as requested by any of (i) one or several shareholders holding at least 5% of our share capital;

·

(ii) in cases of urgency, designated employee representatives or any interested party;

·

or (iii) duly qualified associations of shareholders who have held their shares in registered form for at least two years and who together hold at least 1% of the voting rights of our company; or

·

in a bankruptcy, our liquidator or court-appointed agent may also call a shareholders’ meeting in some instances.certain instances; or

Shareholders

shareholders holding more than 50% of our share capital or voting rights may also convene a shareholders’ meeting after a public offer or a sale of a controlling stake of our capital.

Notice of Shareholders’ Meetings

We must announce general meetings at least 3035 days in advance (or 15 days in case of a public offer for our shares) by means of a preliminary notice published in theBulletin des Annonces Légales Obligatoires (“BALO”). The preliminary notice must first be sent to the AMF. The AMF also recommends that the preliminary notice be published in a newspaper of national circulation in France. The preliminary notice must disclose, among other things, the time, date, and place of the meeting, whether the meeting will be ordinary or extraordinary, the agenda, a draft of the resolutions to be submitted to the shareholders and a description of the procedures which holders of bearer shares must follow to attend the meeting, the procedure for voting by mail, andmail. The notice must contain a statement informing the shareholders that they may propose additional resolutions to the board of directors eit her (i) twenty-five days before the date of the meeting, or (ii) within tentwenty days of the publication of the notice.notice (or 5 days in case of a public offer for our shares) when such notice was published more than 45 days before the date of the shareholders’ meeting.



150



Back to Contents


We must send a final notice containing the agenda and other information about the meeting at least 15 days (or six days in case of a public offer for our shares) prior to the meeting or at least six days (or four days in case of a public offer for our shares) prior to the resumption of any meeting adjourned for lack of a quorum. The final notice must be sent by mail to all registered shareholders who have held shares for more than one month prior to the date of the preliminary notice. The final notice must also be published in the BALO and in a newspaper authorized to publish legal announcements in the local administrative department in which our company is registered, with prior notice having been given to the AMF.

In general, shareholders can take action at shareholders’ meetings only on matters listed in the agenda for the meeting. One exception to this rule is that shareholders may take action with respect to the dismissal of members of the board of directors regardless of whether these actions are on the agenda. Additional resolutions to be submitted for approval by the shareholders at the meeting may be proposed to the board of directors (within ten days ofafter the publication of the preliminary notice in the BALO)BALO as described above by:

·

designated employee representatives;

·

one or several shareholders holding a specified percentage of shares; or

·

a duly qualified association of shareholders who have held their shares in registered form for at least two years and who together hold at least 1% of our voting rights.

The board of directors must submit properly proposed resolutions to a vote of the shareholders.

During the two weeks preceding a meeting of shareholders, any

Any shareholder may submit written questions to the board of directors relating to the agenda for the meeting at least four business days before the shareholder’s meeting. Such shareholder must also provide a certificate evidencing share ownership. The board of directors must respond to these questions during the meeting.

Attendance and Voting at Shareholders’ Meetings

Each share confers on the shareholder the right to cast one vote. Shareholders may attend ordinary meetings and extraordinary meetings and exercise their voting rights subject to the conditions specified in the French commercial code and ourstatuts. In particular, a holder must have accurately disclosed any substantial interest in our company (as described under “— Anti-Takeover Provisions — Disclosure of Substantial Shareholdings” and “— Anti-Takeover Effects of Applicable Law and Regulations”) and the holder’s shares must be fully paid up. In addition, a shareholder is not permitted to vote on specific resolutions that would confer a particular benefit on that shareholder. There is no requirement that shareholders have a minimum number of shares in order to attend or to be represented at an ordinary or extraordinary general meeting.

ToThe right to participate in any general meeting, a holdermeetings is subject to the record of the shares held in registered form must have shares registered in his or her name or the name of the shareholder or of the accredited intermediary registered on behalf of such shareholder at least three business days prior to the meeting, at zero hours, Paris time, either in the shareholders’ register held by our company, or in the bearer share account held by the intermediary. The registration or record in the bearer share account held by the authorized intermediary is authenticated by a certificate of participation issued by such authorized intermediary, attached to the postal or proxy voting form or as part of an intermediaryapplication for an admission card in a shareholder account maintained by usthe shareholder’s name or on our behalf of the shareholder represented by the registered intermediary. A certificate is also issued to any shareholder who wishes to attend the meeting in person and has not received an agent appointedadmission card by us no later than 3:00 p.m. (Paris time) on the thir d business day prior to the date set for the meeting. A holder of bearer shares must obtain an account certificate from the accredited intermediary with whom the holder has deposited his or her shares indicating that the bearer shares the



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 71



Back to contents


holder owns will be unavailable until the date of the meeting. The holder must deposit this certificatemeeting, at the place specified in the notice of the meeting no later than 3:00 p.m. (Paris time) on the day prior to the date set for the meeting.zero hours, Paris time.

Proxies and Votes by Mail

In general, all shareholders who have properly registeredrecorded their shares, and / or duly presented a certificate from their accredited financial intermediary may participate in general meetings. Shareholders may participate in general meetings either in person or by proxy. Shareholders may vote in person, by proxy or by mail.

Proxies will be sent to any shareholder on request. To be counted, such proxies must be received at our registered office, or at any other address indicated on the notice convening the meeting, prior to the date of the meeting. A shareholder may grant proxies to his or her spouse or to another shareholder. A shareholder that is a corporation may grant proxies to a legal representative. Alternatively, the shareholder may send us a blank proxy without nominating any representative. In this case, the chairman of the meeting will vote blank proxies in favor of all resolutions proposed by the board of directors and against all others.

With respect to votes by mail, we are required to send shareholders a voting form. The completed form must be returned to us, in paper format or in electronic form, at least three days prior to the date of the shareholders’ meeting.



151



Back to Contents


Quorum

The French commercial code requires that shareholders having at least 20% of the shares entitled to voting rights must be present in person or be voting by mail or by proxy to fulfill the quorum requirement for:

·

an ordinary general meeting; or

·

an extraordinary general meeting where only the following resolutions are proposed: (i) an increase in our share capital is proposed through incorporation of reserves, profits or share premium.premium, and/or (ii) an authorization to issue warrants with preferential rights to subscribe shares of the company during a takeover bid period.

The quorum requirement is 25% of the shares entitled to voting rights, on the same basis, for any other extraordinary general meeting.

If a quorum is not present at a meeting, the meeting is adjourned. When an adjourned meeting is resumed, there is no quorum requirement for an ordinary meeting or for an extraordinary general meeting where only the following resolutions are proposed: (i) an increase in our share capital is proposed through incorporation of reserves, profits or share premium.premium, and/or (ii) an authorization to issue warrants with preferential rights to subscribe shares of the company during a takeover bid period. However, only questions that were on the agenda of the adjourned meeting may be discussed and voted upon. In the case of any other reconvened extraordinary general meeting, shareholders having at least 20% of outstanding voting rights must be present in person or be voting by mail or proxy for a quorum. If a quorum is not present, the reconvened meeting may be adjourned for a maximum of two months. Any deliberation by the shareholderssha reholders taking place without a quorum is void.

In instances where we have given prior notice to shareholders that they may participate in a meeting through videoconference or through other means which permit their identification under applicable law, shareholders who so participate shall be counted for purposes of calculating whether a quorum (or a majority as discussed below) exists.  

Majority

A simple majority of shareholders present or represented may pass any resolution on matters required to be considered at an ordinary general meeting, or at an extraordinary general meeting only concerning either or both of a capital increase by incorporation of reserves, profits or share premium atand/or an extraordinary general meeting.authorization to issue warrants with preferential rights to subscribe shares of the company during a takeover bid period. At any other extraordinary general meeting, a two-thirds majority of the shareholder votes cast is required.

A unanimous shareholder vote is required to increase liabilities of shareholders.

Abstention from voting by those present or those represented by proxy or voting mail is counted as a vote against the resolution submitted to the shareholder vote.

In general, a shareholder is entitled to one vote per share at any general meeting. Under the French commercial code, shares of a company held by entities controlled directly or indirectly by that company are not entitled to voting rights and are not considered for quorum purposes.

Limitations on Right to Own Securities

OurAs of the date of this annual report, ourstatuts do not contain any provisions that limit the right of shareholders to own our securities or hold or exercise voting rights associated with those securities. See “— Exchange Controls” for a description of certain requirements imposed by the French commercial code.

However, an amendment to ourstatuts will be proposed at our combined shareholders' meeting of May 7, 2008, pursuant to which as soon as a shareholder, whether alone or in concert, gains ownership of more than 20% of the capital or voting rights of our company, the number of votes available to that shareholder or its representative at our general shareholders' meetings in respect of the shares that it owns, directly or indirectly, shall not exceed 20% of the total voting rights of our company. This cap on voting rights shall cease to have effect and shall lapse as soon as the shareholder concerned crosses the ownership threshold of one-third of the share capital or total voting rights of our company. This amendment is designed to prevent creeping takeovers, which have a negative impact in particular on minority shareholders, who would be affected by a change in control of the company without the payment of a control premium. If adopted by the combined shareholders' meeting, this amendment shall have immediate effect.



152



Back to Contents


Trading in Our Own Shares

Under French law, our company may not issue shares to itself. However, we may, either directly or through a financial intermediary acting on our behalf, purchase shares representing up to 10% of our share capital. To acquire our own shares, we must obtain the approval of our shareholders at an ordinary general meeting.  In addition, under French law, we are required to disclose tothrough a publication on our website the AMF the details of transactions we carry out with respect to our shares within seven days after their occurrence. On a monthly basis, we must also provide a summary to the AMF with the details of the transactions we have carried out with respect to our shares during the preceding month.

At the general shareholders’ meeting held on May 11, 2006,10, 2007, our shareholders approved a share repurchase program that authorizes us to purchase, sell or transfer our shares at any time and by any means, including block trades and combinations of financial derivative instruments, subject to market regulations and the 10% limit provided by law.  This program allows us to repurchase or sell shares for the purpose of:

·

implementing stock option plans,

·

awarding or selling shares to employees in connection with a company savings plan established in accordance with applicable law,

·

awarding free shares to certain employees and officers,

·

delivering shares to third parties upon exercise of rights attached to securities that give access to share capital through repayment, conversion, exchange, presentation of a warrant or in any other manner,

·

delivering shares (as exchange, payment or otherwise) in connection with transactions involving external growth, mergers, sales, spin-offs or contributions,

·

enhancing the secondary market or liquidity in respect of our shares through an investment services provider, in connection with a liquidity contract signed with such provider conforming to professional rules set forthapproved by the AMF,

·

the completion of purchases, sales or transfers by any means through an investment services provider, in particular off-market transactions, and

·

canceling all or a portion of repurchased shares.shares, and

any other purpose that is or will be authorized by French laws and regulation.

Share repurchases are subject to the following conditions: (i) the number of shares that we are allowed to purchase over the course of the share repurchase program may not exceed 10% of our share capital, (ii) the number of shares we may acquire to be held in treasury subsequently delivered in connection with mergers, spin-offs, or approximately 40,787,260 shares ascontributions may not exceed 5% of December 31, 2005,our share capital, and (ii)(iii) the number of shares that we may hold at any given moment may not exceed 10% of our share capital.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 72



Back to contents


The maximum repurchase price under the program is €60€90 per share (or the corresponding amount in any other currency).  The maximum purchase price applies only to share repurchases decided on after the annual general shareholders’ meeting held on May 11, 2006,10, 2007, and not to transactions entered into pursuant to an authorization granted by a prior shareholders’ meeting but providing for share repurchases to be carried out after the date of this meeting. In addition, we can only make payments for share repurchases up to an aggregate amount of €1.5 billion under the program.  Our board of directors has broad powers to implement the program and set, if necessary, the terms and conditions of any share repurchases, including the power to delegate any of its powers.  The shareholders’ authorization for this program expires at the latest on November 11, 2007,10, 2008, which is 181 8 months after the date of the shareholders’ meeting that approved the program, unless our general shareholders’ meeting of May 7, 2008 authorizes a new share repurchase program.  & nbsp;

The share repurchase program approved on May 11, 2006 replaces10, 2007 replaced our previous share repurchase program that was approved at our general shareholders’ meeting held onof May 12, 2005.11, 2006.  Share repurchases made pursuant to the program authorized on May 12, 2005these programs are detailed in Item 16E below.



153



Back to Contents


A new share repurchase program shall be proposed at the general shareholders’ meeting of May 7, 2008 authorizing our company to implement a new share repurchase plan for the same purposes and subject to the same maximum percentage limits as those described above with respect to the program approved at the May 10, 2007 shareholders’ meeting.  The maximum purchase price for shares under this resolution would be €90 per share (or the equivalent value at the same date in all other currencies), which maximum price shall only be applicable to acquisitions decided after the date of the combined general shareholders’ meeting of May 7, 2008 and not to transactions concluded before this meeting but providing for share acquisitions to be carried out after the date of this meeting.The total amount allocated to this share repurchase plan authorized may not exceed €1 .5 billion.  This authorization would replace any prior authorization granted to the board of directors to trade in our shares, effective from May 7, 2008 and if applicable for the value of any unused portion of any prior authorization.  It would be granted for a period of eighteen months from the date of the combined general shareholders’ meeting.     

As of February 28, 2006,April 30, 2008, we held 15,990,24215,054,237 shares, representing 3.92%3.19% of our share capital.  The accounting value (not including provisions) of our total portfolio at that date was €452,729,325,€459,207,263, while the market value was €700,532,502.€700,624,190. None of our subsidiaries held any of our shares as of February 28, 2006.that date.  We have not cancelled any of our shares over the past 24 months.

Anti-Takeover Provisions — Disclosure of Substantial Shareholdings

Ourstatuts currently provide that any person, acting alone or groupin concert with others, that fails to notify us within 15 days of acquiring, directly or indirectly, or disposing of 1% or any multiple of 1% of our shares or voting rights willcan be deprived of voting rights for shares in excess of the unreported fraction.fraction for all shareholders’ meetings until the end of a two-year period from the date on which such person returns to compliance with the notification requirements, if it is so required by one or several shareholders holding at least 1% of our share capital or voting rights. In addition, accredited intermediaries that hold shares on behalf of non-French resident shareholders are required to comply with this notification obligation in respect of the total amount of shares held on behalf of the non-French resident shareholders.

A modification of this provision of ourstatuts will be proposed at the shareholders’ meeting of May 7, 2008 in order to raise the first statutory declaration threshold to 2%. Should this resolution be approved by the shareholders’ meeting, any person, acting alone or in concert with others, that acquires, directly or indirectly, or disposes of a portion of our shares or voting rights equal to (i) an initial threshold of 2% of our shares or voting rights, or (ii) any percentage of our shares or voting rights equal to a multiple of 1% above this initial 2% threshold, must notify our company by registered letter, within five trading days of crossing this threshold, of the total number of shares, voting rights and securities granting access to our capital that it owns, directly or indirectly, alone or in concert with others.

Anti-Takeover Effects of Applicable Law and Regulations

In addition, the French commercial code provides that any individual or entity, acting alone or in concert with others, that becomes the owner, directly or indirectly, of more than 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, one-third, 50%, two-thirds, 90% and 95% of the outstanding shares or voting rights of a listed company in France, such as our company, or that increases or decreases its shareholding or voting rights above or below any of those percentages, must notify the company within 5 trading days of the date it crosses such thresholds of the number of shares and voting rights it holds. The individual or entity must also notify the AMF within 5 trading days of the date it crosses these thresholds, which will make the information public.  In the event the individual or entity is not domiciled in France, the financial intermediary that holds the shares on its behalf will be required to deliver these notices.

French law and AMF regulations impose additional reporting requirements on persons who acquire more than 10% or 20% of the outstanding shares or voting rights of a listed company. These persons must file a report with the company and the AMF within 10 trading days of the date they cross the threshold. In the report, the acquiror must specify its intentions for the following 12-month period, including whether or not it intends to continue its purchases, to acquire control of the company in question or to nominate candidates for the board of directors. The AMF makes the notice public. The acquiror may amend its stated intentions, provided that it does so on the basis of significant changes in its own situation or that of its shareholders. Upon any change of intention, it must file a new report.



154



Back to Contents


If any person fails to comply with the legal notification requirement, the shares that exceed the relevant threshold will be deprived of voting rights for all shareholders’ meetings until the end of a two-year period following the date on which such person complies with the notification requirements. In addition, any shareholder who fails to comply with the specific requirements described above (including the declaration of intentions) when acquiring more than 10% or 20% of the outstanding shares or voting rights of a listed company shall be deprived of voting rights for all the shares that exceed the relevant threshold for all shareholders’ meetings until the end of a two-year period following the date on which such person complies with the notification requirements.

To permit holders to give the required notice, we are required to publish in the BALO no later than 15 calendar days after the annual ordinary general meeting of shareholders information with respect to the total number of voting rights outstanding as of the date of such meeting. In addition, if the number of outstanding voting rights changes by 5% or more between two annual ordinary general meetings, we are required to publish in the BALO, within 15 calendar days of such change, the number of voting rights outstanding and provide the AMF with written notice of such information. TheHowever, these obligations are deemed to be fulfilled and not to apply to listed companies that are required to publish and send to the AMF publisheson a monthly basis the total number of shares and voting rights so notified by all listed companies in a weekly notice, notingcomposing their share capital, if such numbers have varied since the date each such number was last updated.

If any person fails to comply with the legal notification requirement, the shares that exceed the relevant threshold will be deprived of voting rights for all shareholders’ meetings until the end of a two-year period following the date on which their owner complies with the notification requirements. In addition, any shareholder who fails to comply with these requirements may have all or part of its voting rights suspended for up to five years by the Commercial Court at the request of our chairman, any shareholder or the AMF, and may be subject to a fine.publication.

Under AMF regulations, and subject to limited exemptions granted by the AMF, any person or persons acting in concert that own in excess of one-third of the share capital or voting rights of a French listed company must initiate a public tender offer for the remaining outstanding share capital of such company.

In addition, a number of provisions of the French commercial code allow corporations to adoptstatuts that have anti-takeover effects, including provisions that allow:

·

allow shares with double voting rights;

·

a company’s board of directors to increase the company’s share capital during a tender offer;rights and

·

limitations on the voting power of shareholders.

EXCHANGE CONTROLS

The French commercial code currently does not limit the right of non-residents of France or non-French persons to own and vote shares. However, non-residents of France must file an administrative notice with French authorities in connection with the acquisition of a controlling interest in our company. Under existing administrative rulings, ownership of 33 1/3% or more of our share capital or voting rights by non-residents of France is regarded as a controlling interest, but a lower percentage might be held to be a controlling interest in certain circumstances depending upon factors such as:

·

the acquiring party’s intentions,

·

the acquiring party’s ability to elect directors, or

·

financial reliance by us on the acquiring party.

French exchange control regulations currently do not limit the amount of payments that we may remit to nonresidents of France. Laws and regulations concerning foreign exchange controls do require, however, that all payments or transfers of funds made by a French resident to a nonresident be handled by an accredited intermediary. In France, all registered banks and most credit establishments are accredited intermediaries.



155



Back to Contents


TAXATION

French Taxation

The following generally summarizes the material French tax consequences of purchasing, owning and disposing of our shares or ADSs. The statements relating to French tax laws set forth below are based on the laws in force as of the date hereof, and are subject to any changes in applicable laws and tax treaties after such date.

This discussion is intended only as a descriptive summary and does not purport to be a complete analysis or listing of all potential tax effects of the purchase, ownership or disposition of our shares or ADSs.

The following summary does not address the treatment of shares or ADSs that are held by a resident of France (except for purposes of describing related tax consequences for other holders) or in connection with a permanent establishment or fixed base through which a holder carries on business or performs personal services in France, or by a person that owns, directly or indirectly, 5% or more of the stock of our company.  Moreover, the following discussion of the tax treatment of dividends only deals with distributions made on or after January 1, 2006.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 73



Back to contents


There are currently no procedures available for holders that are not U.S. residents to claim tax treaty benefits in respect of dividends received on ADSs or shares registered in the name of a nominee. Such holders should consult their own tax adviser about the consequences of owning and disposing of ADSs.

Investors should consult their own tax advisers regarding the tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of shares in the light of their particular circumstances.

Taxation of Dividends on Shares

In France, dividends are paid out of after-tax income. Dividends paid to non-residents normally are subject to a 25% French withholding tax.tax at a rate of 25% (18% for distributions made as from January 1, 2008 to individuals that are resident in the European Economic Area (the “EEA”), except Liechtenstein). However, non-resident holders that are entitled to and comply with the procedures for claiming benefits under an applicable tax treaty may be subject to a reduced rate (generally 15%) of French withholding tax. If a non-resident holder establishes its entitlement to treaty benefits prior to the payment of a dividend, then French tax generally will be withheld at the reduced rate provided under the treaty.

New Tax Credit

As a result of the reforms implemented by the French Finance Law for 2004 and the French Finance Law for 2006, from January 1, 2006, French resident individuals are normally taxed on only 60% of the dividends they receive and, in addition to a fixed allowance, are entitled to a tax credit equal to 50% of all dividends received within one year (the “Tax Credit”), unless they elect to be subject to an 18% levy at the source on the full amount of any dividends they may receive (which election is available for distributions made as from January 1, 2008). The Tax Credit is capped at €230 for married couples and members of a union agreement subject to joint taxation and €115 for single persons, widows or widowers, divorcees or married persons subject to separate taxation.

Dividends paid to non-residents are not normally eligible for the Tax Credit described above. However, qualifying non-resident individuals may, depending on the provisions of the tax treaty possibly entered into between France and their country of residence, benefit from a refund of the Tax Credit (net of applicable withholding tax) under certain conditions, subject to compliance with the procedures for claiming benefits under the applicable treaty. The French tax authorities have not yet issued any guidance with regard to the procedures for claiming the refund of the Tax Credit to non-resident individuals.  Individual investors are urged to consult their own tax advisers in this respect.

Taxation on Sale or Disposition of Shares or ADSs

Subject to the more favorable provisions of a relevant tax treaty, holders that are not residents of France for tax purposes, do not hold shares or ADSs in connection with the conduct of a business or profession in France, and have not held more than 25% of our dividend rights (droits aux bénéfices sociaux), directly or indirectly, at any time during the preceding five years, are not subject to French income tax or capital gains tax on the sale or disposition of shares or ADSs.

A 1.1% ad valorem registration duty (subject to a maximum of €4,000€4000 per transfer) applies to certain transfers of shares in French companies.  This duty does not apply to transfers of shares in listed companies that are not evidenced by a written agreement, or if any such agreement is executed outside France.



156



Back to Contents


Estate and Gift Tax

France imposes estate and gift tax on shares or ADSs of a French corporation that are acquired by inheritance or gift. The tax applies without regard to the tax residence of the transferor. However, France has entered into estate and gift tax treaties with a number of countries pursuant to which, assuming certain conditions are met, residents of the treaty country may be exempted from such tax or obtain a tax credit.

Wealth Tax

Individuals who are not residents of France for purposes of French taxation are not subject to a wealth tax(impôt de solidarité sur la fortune) in France as a result of owning an interest in the share capital of a French corporation, provided that such ownership interest is less than 10% of the corporation’s share capital and does not enable the shareholder to exercise influence over the corporation. Double taxation treaties may provide for a more favorable tax treatment.

Taxation of U.S. Investors

The following is a summary of the material French and U.S. federal income tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of our shares or ADSs if you are a holder that is a resident of the United States for purposes of the income tax convention between the United States and France (the “Treaty”) and are fully eligible for benefits under the Treaty (a “U.S. holder”). You generally will be entitled to Treaty benefits in respect of our shares or ADSs if you are:

·

the beneficial owner of the shares or ADSs (and the dividends paid with respect thereto);

·

an individual resident of the United States, a U.S. corporation or other entity taxable as a partnership,corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, or an estate or trust to the extent its income is subject to taxation in the United States in its hands or in the hands of its partners or beneficiaries;

·

not also a resident of France for French tax purposes; and

·

not subject to an anti-treaty shopping article that applies in limited circumstances.

Special rules apply to pension funds and certain other tax-exempt investors.

If a partnership (including any entity treated as a partnership for U.S. tax purposes) is a beneficial owner of shares or ADSs, the U.S. tax treatment of a partner in the partnership will generally depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. A holder of shares or ADSs that is a partnership and partners in such partnership should consult their tax advisors about the U.S. federal income tax consequences of holding and disposing of shares or ADSs.

For U.S. federal income tax purposes, a U.S. holder’s ownership of the company’s ADSs will be treated as ownership of the company’s underlying shares.

This summary does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to any particular investor, and does not discuss tax considerations that arise from rules of general application or that are generally assumed to be known by investors. In particular, the summary does not deal with shares or ADSs that are not held as capital assets, and does not address the tax treatment of holders that are subject to special rules, such as banks, insurance companies, dealers in securities or currencies, regulated investment companies, persons that elect mark-to-market treatment, persons holding shares or ADSs as a position in a synthetic security, straddle or conversion transaction, persons that own, directly or indirectly, 5% or more of our voting stock or 10% or more of our outstanding capital and persons whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar. The summary is based on laws, , treaties, regulatory interpretations and judicial decisions in effect on the date hereof, all of which are subject to change.

This summary does not discuss the treatment of shares or ADSs that are held in connection with a permanent establishment or fixed base through which a holder carries on business or performs personal services in France. Moreover, the following discussion of the tax treatment of dividends only deals with distributions made on or after January 1, 2006.

You should consult your own tax advisers regarding the tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of shares or ADSs in the light of your particular circumstances, including the effect of any state, local or other national laws.



157



Back to Contents


Dividends

Generally, dividend distributions to non-residents of France are subject to French withholding tax at a rate of 25% rate  and are not eligible for the benefit of the Tax Credit available to French resident individuals, as described above. However, under the Treaty, you can claim the benefit of a reduced dividend withholding tax rate of 15%.

In addition, if you are an individual U.S. holder, you may be entitled to a refund of the Tax Credit, less a 15% withholding tax, provided that you are subject to U.S. federal income tax on the Tax Credit and the dividend to which it relates. The French tax authorities have not yet issued guidance with respect to the procedures for claiming the refund of the Tax Credit to non-resident individuals.

U.S. holders that are not individuals are no longer entitled to tax credit payments from the French Treasury.

French withholding tax will be withheld at the 15% Treaty rate if you have established before the date of payment that you are a resident of the United States under the Treaty by following the simplified procedure described below.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 74



Back to contents


The gross amount of dividend and Tax Credit that a U.S. Holderholder receives (prior to deduction of French withholding tax) generally will be subject to U.S. federal income taxation as ordinary dividend income to the extent paid or deemed paid out of the current or accumulated earnings and profits of our company (as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles). Such dividends will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction generally allowed to U.S. corporations.

Subject to certain U.S. holder exceptions for short-term and hedged positions, the U.S. dollar amount of dividends received by an individual prior to January 1, 2011 with respect to the shares or ADSs will be subject to taxation at a maximum rate of 15% if the dividends are “qualified dividends.”  Dividends paid on the shares or ADSs will be treated as qualified dividends if (i) the issuer is eligible for the benefits of a comprehensive income tax treaty with the United States that the IRS has approved for the purposes of the qualified dividend rules and (ii) our company was not a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”), in the year prior to the year in which the dividend was paid, and is not a PFIC in the year in which the dividend is paid.  The Treaty has been approved for the purposes of the qualified dividend rules.  Based on our company’s audited financial statement sfi nancial statements and relevant market and shareholder data, our company believes that it was not treated as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes with respect to its 20042006 or 20052007 taxable year.years.  In addition, based on our company’s audited financial statements and its current expectations regarding the value and nature of its assets, the sources and nature of its income, and relevant market data, our company does not anticipate becoming a PFIC for its 20062008 taxable year.  Accordingly, dividends paid by our company in 20062008 to a U.S. holder should constitute “qualified dividends” unless such holder acquired its shares or ADSs during a year in which our company was a PFIC and such holder did not make a mark-to-market election.

The U.S. Treasury has announced its intention to promulgate rules pursuant to which holders of ADSs or common stock and intermediaries though whom such securities are held will be permitted to rely on certifications from issuers to establish that dividends are treated as qualified dividends.  Because such procedures have not yet been issued, it is not clear whether our company will be able to comply with them.

Holders of ADSs and shares should consult their own tax advisers regarding the availability of the reduced dividend tax rate in the light of their own particular circumstances.

Distributions out of earnings and profits with respect to the shares or ADSs generally will be treated as dividend income from sources outside of the United States and generally will be treated separately along with other items of “passive”as “passive category” (or, in the case of certain U.S. holders, “financial services”“general category”) income for purposes of determining the credit for foreign income taxes allowed under the Code.  Subject to certain limitations, French incomewithholding tax withheld in connection with any distribution with respect to the shares or ADSs may be claimed as a credit against the U.S. federal income tax liability of a U.S. holder if such U.S. holder elects for that year to credit all foreign income taxes.  Alternatively, such French withholding tax may be taken as a deduction against taxable income.  Foreign tax credits will not be allowed for withholding taxes imposed in respect of ce rtaincertain short-term or hedged positions in securities.  U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors concerning the implications of these rules in light of their particular circumstances.

To the extent that an amount received by a U.S. holder exceeds the allocable share of current and accumulated earnings and profits of our company, such excess will be applied first, to reduce such U.S. holder’s tax basis in its shares or ADSs and then, to the extent it exceeds the U.S. holder’s tax basis, it will constitute capital gain from a deemed sale or exchange of such shares or ADSs.

Dividends paid in euroeuros will be included in your income in a U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the date you receive the dividend (or the date the depositary receives the dividend, in the case of the ADSs), regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars. If such a dividend is converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, you generally should not be required to recognize foreign currency gain or loss in respect of the dividend income.



158



Back to Contents


Procedures for Claiming Treaty Benefits

The French tax authorities issued new guidelines in theInstructionn° 4 J-1-05, dated February 25, 2005 that significantly changed the formalities to be complied with by non-resident shareholders, including U.S. holders, in order to obtain the reduced withholding tax rate on distributions made on or after January 1, 2005.

Pursuant to the new guidelines, U.S. holders can either claim Treaty benefits under a simplified procedure or under the normal procedure.  The procedure to be followed depends on whether the application for Treaty benefits is filed before or after the dividend payment.

Under the simplified procedure, in order to benefit from the lower rate of withholding tax applicable under the Treaty before the payment of the dividend, you must complete and deliver to the paying agent (through its account holder), as set outa treaty form (Form 5000) to certify in theInstruction n° 4 J-1-05 mentioned above, a certificate statingparticular that:

·

you are beneficially entitled to the dividend;

you are a U.S. resident within the meaning of the Treaty;

·

the dividend is not derived from a permanent establishment or a fixed base that you own in France; and

·

the dividend received is subjector will be reported to the tax authorities in the United States.

For partnerships or trusts, claimclaims for Treaty benefits and related attestations are made by the partners, beneficiaries or grantors who also have to supply certain additional documentation.

In order to be eligible for Treaty benefits, pension funds and certain other tax-exempt U.S. holders must comply with the simplified procedure described above, though they may be required to supply additional documentation evidencing their entitlement to those benefits.

If the certificateForm 5000 is not filed prior to the dividend payment, a withholding tax will be levied at the 25% rate, and you would have to claim a refund for the excess under the normal procedure by filing a specific treaty form (n° 5052 RF 1 – EU or n° 5053 RF 1 – EU)both Form 5000 and Form 5001 no later than December 31 of the second year following the year in which the dividend is paid.

Copies of Form 5000 and Form 5001 can be downloaded from the simplified certificateFrench tax authorities’ website (www.impots.gouv.fr) and of the specific treaty forms are also available from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and from theCentre des Impôts des Non-Résidents (9in France (10 rue d’Uzès, 75094 Paris Cedex 2)du Centre, 93160 Noisy-le-Grand).

Finally, please note that, as mentioned above, the French tax authorities have not yet issued any guidance with respect to the procedures for claiming the refund of the Tax Credit to non-resident individuals.

Capital Gains

Under the Treaty, you will not be subject to French tax on any gain derived from the sale or exchange of shares or ADSs, unless the gain is effectively connected with a permanent establishment or fixed base maintained by you in France.

ForIn general, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, a U.S. holder that sells, exchanges or otherwise disposes of its shares or ADSs will recognize capital gain or loss you realize onin an amount equal to the sale or other disposition ofU.S. dollar difference between the amount realized for the shares or ADSs and the holder’s adjusted tax basis (determined in U.S. dollars) in the shares or ADSs.  Such gain or loss generally will be capitalU.S.-source gain or loss, and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the shares were held for more than one year. The net long-term capital gain recognized by an individual U.S. holder before January 1, 2011 generally is subject to taxation at a maximum rate of 15%. Your ability to offset capital losses against ordinary income is limited.

French Estate and Gift Tax

Under the estate and gift tax convention between the United States and France, a transfer of shares or ADSs by gift or by reason of the death of a U.S. holder entitled to benefits under that convention will not be subject to French gift or inheritance tax, so long as the donor or decedent was not domiciled in France at the time of the transfer, and the shares or ADSs were not used or held for use in the conduct of a business or profession through a permanent establishment or fixed base in France.



159



Back to Contents


French Wealth Tax

The French wealth tax does not generally apply to shares or ADSs of a U.S. Holder if the holder is a resident of the United States for purposes of the Treaty.




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 75



Back to contents


U.S. Information Reporting and Backup Withholding Rules

Payments of dividends and sales proceeds that are made within the United States or through certain U.S.-related financial intermediaries are subject to information reporting and may be subject to backup withholding unless the holder (i) is a corporation or other exempt recipient or (ii) provides a taxpayer identification number and certifies that no loss of exemption from backup withholding has occurred. Holders that are not U.S. persons generally are not subject to information reporting or backup withholding. However, such a holder may be required to provide a certification of its non-U.S. status in connection with payments received within the United States or through a U.S.-related financial intermediary.

DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY

Certain documents referred to in this document can be inspected at our offices at 36/38, avenue Kléber, 75116 Paris, France.

We are subject to the periodic reporting and other informational requirements of the Exchange Act. Under the Exchange Act, we are required to file reports and other information with the SEC. Specifically, we are required to file annually a Form 20-F no later than six months after the close of each fiscal year. Copies of reports and other information, when so filed, may be inspected without charge and may be obtained at prescribed rates at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at Judiciary Plaza, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information regarding the SEC’s Public Reference Rooms by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from the rules under the Exchange Act prescribing the furnishing and content of quarterly reports and proxy statements, and officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions in Section 16 of the Exchange Act.

ENFORCEABILITY OF CIVIL LIABILITIES AGAINST FOREIGN PERSONS

Our company is a corporation organized under the laws of France. The majorityAll of our directors are citizens and residents of countries other than the United States, and the majority of our assets are located outside of the United States. Accordingly, it may be difficult for investors:

·

to obtain jurisdiction over our company or our directors in courts in the United States in actions predicated on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws;

·

to enforce judgments obtained in such actions against us or our directors;

·

to obtain judgments against us or our directors in original actions in non-U.S. courts predicated solely upon the U.S. federal securities laws; or

·

to enforce against us or our directors in non-U.S. courts judgments of courts in the United States predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws.

Actions brought in France for enforcement of judgments of U.S. courts rendered against French persons, including some directors of our company, would require those persons to waive their right to be sued in France under Article 15 of the French Civil Code. In addition, actions in the United States under the U.S. federal securities laws could be affected under certain circumstances by the French law of July 16, 1980, which may preclude or restrict the obtaining of evidence in France or from French persons in connection with those actions. Each of the foregoing statements applies to our auditors as well.



160



Back to Contents



STATEMENT ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 303A.11 OF THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE’S LISTED COMPANY MANUAL

Set forth below is a brief summary of the principal ways in which our corporate governance practices differ from the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) corporate governance rules applicable to U.S. domestic companies listed on the NYSE.


Our company is incorporated under the laws of France and the principal trading market for our shares is the Eurolist of Euronext Paris. Our ADSs are listed on the NYSE and trade in the form of American Depositary Receipts (ADRs), each of which represent one Veolia Environnement ordinary share.


Our corporate governance practices reflect applicable laws and regulations in France as well as those in the U.S., including applicable provisions of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act (see “Item 6: Directors, Senior Management and Employees” for information regarding our current corporate governance structure, including the composition and responsibilities of our committees). Many of the corporate governance rules in the NYSE Listed Company Manual (the NYSE Manual) do not apply to us as a “foreign private issuer.” However, Rule 303A.11 requires foreign private issuers to describe significant differences between their corporate governance standards and the corporate governance standards applicable to U.S. domestic companies listed on the NYSE. While our management believes that our corporate governance practices are similar in many respects to those of U.S. NYSE-listed companies and provide investors wit hwith protections that are comparable in many respects to those established by the NYSE Manual, there are certain important differences which are described below.


Our board of directors annually evaluates the independence of its members based on criteria set forth in its internal charter, which are based on the recommendations of the report of a French blue ribbon panel chaired by Mr. Daniel Bouton for the improvement of corporate governance in French public companies. We believe that these criteria for independence are generally consistent with those of the NYSE Manual (i.e., to qualify as “independent” under our charter, a director must not have any relations with our company, our subsidiaries or our management that could impair his objective judgment).  However, the specific tests of “independence” may differ on certain points.


Under French law, the committees of our board of directors are advisory in nature and have no independent or delegated decision making authority. This is different than in the case of a U.S. company listed on the NYSE where, for example, the NYSE Manual requires that certain board committees be vested with decision-making powers on certain matters (e.g. nominatingnominations or audit committees). Under French law, ultimate decision-making authority rests with the board of directors, and board committees are charged with examining matters within the scope of their charter and making recommendations on these matters to the board of directors. In addition, under French law the decision as to appointment of a company’s outside auditors belongs to the company’s shareholders and must be made by the shareholders at their annual general meeting upon recommendation of the board of directors. This is different than in the case of a U.S. company listed on the NYSE, where the NYSE Manual requires that this decision be made by the audit committee of the board. Finally, unlike U.S. NYSE-listed companies which are required to have only a single outside auditor, French law requires French listed companies likes ours to have two statutory auditors. In this respect, the requirements and spirit of French law are consistent with the overriding goal of the NYSE Manual (i.e., the audit of a listed company’s accounts must be conducted by auditors independent from company management).


With respect to related party transactions, French law requires the board of directors to approve a broadly-defined range of transactions that could potentially create conflicts of interest between our company, on the one hand, and our directors and executive officers, on the other hand. While the precise scope of this requirement and its application may differ from those applicable to U.S. NYSE-listed companies, this requirement is generally consistent with various provisions of the NYSE Manual that require disclosure and/or approval of various types of related party transactions.




161



Back to Contents


Finally, as a foreign private issuer, our company is exempt from rules imposing certain disclosure and procedural requirements for proxy solicitations under Section 14 of the Exchange Act. In addition, our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and “short-swing” profit recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules under the Exchange Act with respect to their purchases and sales of our ordinary shares and ADSs. In addition, our company is not required to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or promptly as U.S. companies with securities registered under the Exchange Act, nor are we required to comply with Regulation FD, which restricts the selective disclosure of material information. As a result, there may be less publicly-available information concerning our company than for U.S. NYSE-listed companies. Fina lly,Fi nally, as a foreign private issuer, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer issue the certifications required by Sections 302 and 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act on an annual basis (with the filing of our annual report on Form 20-F), rather than on a quarterly basis as would be the case of a U.S. domestic company filing quarterly reports on a Form 10-Q.


For more information regarding our corporate governance practices, you should also refer to our articles of association (statuts), which are filed as an exhibit to this annual report.





VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 76162



Back to contentsContents


ITEM 11: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK


In the course of our operating and financing activities, we are exposed to the following market risks: interest rate risk, foreign exchange risk, counterpartycommodity risk, liquiditycounterparty risk and equity risk.

In order to ensure better control and help reduce our exposure to these risks, we centralize their management. Our riskthe management activitiesof these financial risks in order to ensure better control. Activities are based on the management rules set forthdetailed in anthe internal manual entitled “Rules governing financing/treasury management and related risks,” which isrisks” widely distributed throughout our group.to Group entities. These rules are based on the principles of security, transparency and effectiveness.

We use various derivative instruments to reduce and manage our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates, exchange rates and commodity prices, not all of which qualify for hedge accounting. All of these derivatives are recognized in the balance sheet at fair value.

As a result of our transition to IFRS, we have modified our presentation of market risk. The presentation below therefore differs from the presentation included in our 2004 Form 20-F. See Note 3430 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information about derivative instruments accounting and market risk management.

Exposure to Interest Rate Risk

Our exposure to interest rate risk is mainly attributable to our net financial debt. We manage a structural fixed/floating rate position in order to limit the impact of interest rate fluctuations on our net income and to optimize the cost of debt. For this purpose, we use firm and optional interest rate swap instruments (swaps, caps, floors, etc.).

Our financing structure exposes us naturally to the risk of interest rate fluctuations. As such, fixed rate debt is exposed to a risk of change in fair value if repurchased on the market, while floating-rate debt exposes future financial results.

Short-term debt is primarily indexed to short-term indexes (Eonia for the commercial paper program and Euribor/Libor for our main short-term credit lines). Medium- and long-term debt comprises both fixed- and floating- rate debt. Borrowings are primarily denominated in euro, pound sterling, US dollar, Czech crown and Polish zloty.

The following table shows a breakdown of our gross debt before and after hedging:

(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

 

Outstanding

% total debt

Outstanding

% total debt

Fixed rate

10,586.5

65.3%

9,651.4

54.8%

Floating rate

5,619.0

34.7%

7,966.6

45.2%

Total before hedging

16,205.5

100.0%

17,618.0

100.0%

Fixed rate

8,494.8

52.4%

7,166.8

40.7%

Capped floating rate

1,751.0

10.8%

1,989.7

11.3%

Floating rate

5,959.7

36.8%

8,461.5

48.0%

Total after hedging

16,205.5

100.0%

17,618.0

100.0%

Fair value adjustments to hedging derivatives

162.3

 

284.0

 

Total Long- and short-term borrowings

16,367.8

 

17,902.0

 


Total gross debt as of December 31, 2005 after hedging was 52.4% fixed-rate and 47.6% floating-rate, including 10.8% at capped floating rates. As of December 31, 2005, the exercise price of US dollar caps in the notional amount of USD 650 million (€551 million euro equivalent) was in the money.


The sensitivity of financial expenses is set forth below. We manage our exposure to interest rate fluctuations based on floating-rate debt net of cash, with the breakdown of our floating-rate debt by maturity as follows:


(€ million)

Overnight and less than
1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total

Total assets (cash and cash equivalents)

2,336.1

-

-

2,336.1

Total floating-rate liabilities

(2,645.0)

(2,429.3)

(544.6)

(5,618.9)

Net position before hedging

(308.9)

(2,429.3)

(544.6)

(3,282.8)

Derivative financial instruments (*)

236.0

255.3

(2,032.1)

(1,540.8)

Total position before euro caps

(72.9)

(2,174.0)

(2,576.7)

(4,823.6)

Euro caps (**)

-

-

1,200.0

1,200.0

Net total

(72.9)

(2,174.0)

(1,376.7)

(3,623.6)

(*)

Hedging financial instruments excluding euro caps with an exercise price out of the money as of December 31, 2005.

(**)

Euro caps included in hedging derivatives (€1,200 million) have an exercise price of 3.5%.



Floating-rate debt maturing within less than one year is to a large extent hedged by excess cash balances invested at short-term rates. Floating-rate net debt is therefore €4,824 million (euro equivalent), that is 34.8% of total debt (including 8.7% capped at 3.5%, as set forth above). As such, 65.2% of net debt is at fixed rates. Taking into account the impact of caps the percentage of fixed-rate debt increases to 73.9%.


Assuming a constant net debt policy, a 1% increase in interest rates would generate an increase in annual financial expenses, excluding market impacts, of €48 million.


See Notes 20 and 22 to our consolidated financial statements for information about the principal changes in our long-term and short-term borrowings, respectively.


A certain number of derivative instrument s used as part of our management policy are not qualified as hedges under IAS 32 and 39. We do not, however, consider these transactions to be of a speculative nature and view them as necessary to the effective management of our exposure.




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 77



Back to contents


Derivatives designated as non - - hedge break down as follows as of December 31, 2005:



(€ million)

Notional amounts as of December 31,2005

Faire value of derivatives instruments

 

Total

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total non-current assets

Total non-current liabilities

Fixed-rate receiver/floating-rate payer swaps

752.8

-

2.1

750.7

6.4

0.5

Floating-rate receiver/fixed-rate payer swaps

298.2

-

259.7

38.5

-

4.5

Floating-rate receiver/floating-rate payer swaps

866.0

211.9

654.1

-

0.4

-

Total firm financial instruments

1,917.0

211.9

915.9

789.2

6.8

5.0

Purchases of caps

2,533.3

-

1,321.1

1,212.2

24.2

1.7

Sales of caps (*)

769.0

-

769.0

-

-

-

Total optional financial instruments

3,302.3

-

2,090.1

1,212.2

24.2

1.7

Total derivatives not qualifying for hedge

5,219.3

211.9

3,006.0

2,001.4

31.0

6.7


(€ million)

Notional amounts as of December 31,2004

Faire value of derivatives instruments

 

Total

Less than 1 year

Total

Less than 1 year

Total

Total liabilities

Fixed-rate receiver/floating-rate payer swaps

139.6

-

-

139.6

5.5

-

Floating-rate receiver/fixed-rate payer swaps

1 257.1

-

867.8

389.3

4.9

69.3

Floating-rate receiver/floating-rate payer swaps

342.8

154.5

188.3

-

0.1

1.7

Currency swaps

190.4

-

190.4

-

24.1

0.2

Total firm financial instruments

1,929.9

154.5

1,246.5

528.9

34.6

71.2

Purchases of caps

2,005.3

161.4

950.2

893.7

16.9

-

Sales of caps (*)

765.7

-

765.7

-

-

0.3

Sales of swap options

183.5

-

183.5

-

-

5.8

Total optional financial instruments

2,954.5

161.4

1,899.4

893.7

16.9

6.1

Total derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

4,884.4

315.9

3,145.9

1,422.6

51.5

77.3


(*)

Sales of caps are backed in the amount of €700 million to purchase of caps with the same exercise price and maturity and do not therefore impact net income.

Sensitivity of financial expenses

The portfolio of interest rate derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting generates a certain volatility in net financial income.

As of December 31, 2005, the sensitivity of the portfolio to a change in interest rates is as follows:

-

a 0.25% increase in the interest rate would generate additional financial expenses of €1.3 million ;

-

a 0.25% decrease in the interest rate would generate a reduction in financial expenses of €1.5   million.


Exposure to Foreign Currency Risk


Our international activities in nearly 65 countries generate significant foreign currency flows. We are mainly exposed to foreign exchange risk on our balance sheet “assets” position. Our trading activities do not expose us to significant exchange rate risk.


Our central treasury department manages foreign exchange risk centrally within limits set by our chief financial officer. We use derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to foreign exchange risk (currency swaps, cross currency swaps, currency options, currency forwards).


Management of foreign exchange transaction risk


One of the specific characteristics of environmental services activities is that they bear little transaction risk. Income and expenses are mainly denominated in the currency of the country where we operate. However, optional hedges may be negotiated with the front office when responding to a call for tenders, prior to obtaining the definitive contract.


Management of foreign exchange asset risk


Financing is secured in the local currency for operations located in foreign countries. In the case of inter-company financing, these credit lines can generate foreign exchange risk. In order to limit the impact of this risk, we have developed a policy which seeks to back foreign-currency financing and foreign-currency derivatives with inter-company receivables denominated in the same currency.


The asset exposure hedging strategy primarily involves ensuring that companies in our group do not have a material balance sheet foreign exchange position that could generate significant volatility in foreign exchange gains and losses, and hedging certain net foreign investments (IAS 21/IAS 39), in particular inter-company loans designated as loans and receivables forming part of a net investment.


Hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation


Derivative instruments designated as net investment hedges break down as follows:


(€ million)

Notional amount as of December 31, 2005 by currency and maturity

Fair value of derivative instruments

Financial instruments

Currency

Amount

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

Currency receiver swaps

NOK

86.1

86.1

-

-

1.9

-

HKD

13.3

13.3

-

-

-

0.3

PLN

76.8

76.8

-

-

0.2

-

Embedded derivatives (forward sale)

KRW

100.3

17.8

57.3

25.2

5.2

-

Cross currency swaps: floating rate payer/floating rate receiver

HKD

44.8

44.8

-

-

1.0

-

USD

299.0

-

299.0

-

5.5

-

Total currency derivatives

 

620.3

238.8

356.3

25.2

13.8

0.3

USPP borrowings

USD

302.6

-

 

302.6

N/A

N/A

Syndicated loan

CZK

211.6

-

211.6

-

N/A

N/A

Total financing

 

514.2

-

211.6

302.6

N/A

N/A





VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 78



Back to contents





(€ million)

Notional amount as of December 31, 2004 by currency and maturity

Fair value of derivative instruments

Financial instruments

Currency

Amount

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

Embedded derivatives (forward sale)

KRW

116.8

16.5

62.6

37.7

20.3

 

Cross currency swaps: floating rate payer/floating rate receiver

HKD

44.8

 

44.8

 

6.9

 

USD

299.0

 

299.0

 

44.7

 

Total currency derivatives

 

460.6

16.5

406.4

37.7

71.9

 

USPP borrowings

USD

262.0

  

262.0

N/A

N/A

Syndicated loan

CZK

216.6

 

216.6

 

N/A

N/A

Total financing

 

478.6

 

216.6

262.0

N/A

N/A


Inter-company loans and receivables forming part of a foreign investment (IAS 21) are nearly systematically hedged by foreign currency external financing or currency derivatives (cross currency swaps, currency forwards) meeting IAS 39 criteria for hedge accounting. Foreign exchange gains and losses recorded in foreign exchange translation reserves in respect of hedging instruments are systematically offset by foreign exchange gains and losses recognized in foreign exchange translation reserves on loans forming part of the net investment, unless:


-

the inter-company loan forming part of the net investment in a foreign operation is not hedged;


-

the hedge is ineffective due to a difference between the nominal amount of the hedge and the amount of the hedged net asset;


-

only the net assets of the foreign subsidiary (excluding the loan forming part of the net investment) are hedged.


Net foreign exchange losses recorded in translation reserves as of December 31, 2005 of €35 million comprise:


-

foreign exchange losses of €11 million on an unhedged US dollar inter-company loan forming part of a net investment (IAS 21), capitalized in December 2004;


-

the impact of exchange rate fluctuations for an amount of €23 million coming from investment hedges in the water division in the Czech Republic.


Hedging of balance sheet foreign exchange exposure by derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting


Each month, we determine our foreign exchange position and enter into hedging transactions once we have quantified our foreign exchange exposure and in particular our overall foreign exchange position. Currency derivatives hedging the overall balance sheet foreign exchange position are accounted for as trading transactions, with fair value movements recognized directly in net income.


The portfolio of currency derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting comprises currency forwards and currency options with a maturity of less than one year:


Notional

As of December 31, 2005

 

As of December 31, 2004

(€ million)

Total

USD

GBP

PLN

NOK

SEK

Other

 

Total

USD

GBP

PLN

NOK

SEK

Other

Forward purchases

39.7

15.9

13.1

10.7

 

54.9

25.6

24.2

 -

5.1

Forward sales

48.8

34.9

1.8

12.1

 

24.1

5.1

14.9

 -

4.1

Total currency forwards

88.5

50.8

14.9

-

-

-

22.8

 

79.0

30.7

39.1

-

-

-

9.2

Currency receiver swaps

98.7

12.1

0.6

1.3

0.8

1.1

82.8

 

114.0

9.6

21.9

 

 

1.4

81.1

Currency payer swaps

1,428.1

317.9

602.1

168.4

46.8

91.3

 201.6

 

1,529.2  

587.0

430.2

134.6

118.0

98.2

161.2

Total currency swaps

1,526.8

330.0

602.7

169.7

47.6

92.4

 284.4

 

1,643.2

596.6

452.1

134.6

118.0

99.6

 242.3

Call options

-

 

 

3.2

3.2

Put options

3.6

3.6

 

4.0

4.0

Total currency options

3.6

3.6

-

-

-

-

-

 

7.2

7.2

-

-

-

-

-


Fair value

As of December 31, 2005

 

As of December 31, 2004

(€ million)

Total

USD

GBP

PLN

NOK

SEK

Other

 

Total

USD

GBP

PLN

NOK

SEK

Other

Forward purchases

(1.8)

(1.6)

-

-

-

-

(0.2)

 

(3.4)

(3.1)

-

-

-

-

(0.3)

Currency receiver swaps

(0.3)

0.4

-

-

-

-

(0.7)

 

(0.6)

(1.0)

(0.3)

-

-

-

0.7

Total currency swaps and forward purchases

(2.1)

(1.2)

-

-

-

-

(0.9)

 

(4.0)

(4.1)

(0.3)

-

-

-

0.4

Forward sales

(1.6)

(1.4)

-

-

-

-

(0.2)

 

-

0.5

(0.5)

-

-

-

-

Currency payer swaps

(5.4)

(5.3)

1.5

-

(0.1)

(0.1)

(1.4)

 

4.3

2.0

1.5

(3.3)

2.0

0.7

1.4

Total currency swaps and forward sales

(7.0)

(6.7)

1.5

-

(0.1)

(0.1)

(1.6)

 

4.3

2.5

1.0

(3.3)

2.0

0.7

1.4

Total derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting (*)

(9.1)

(7.9)

1.5

-

(0.1)

(0.1)

(2.5)

 

0.3

(1.6)

0.7

(3.3)

2.0

0.7

1.8

(*) Net fair value (Assets-Liabilities) excluding embedded derivatives


The above portfolio of currency derivatives was mainly contracted by Veolia Environnement SA (holding company) to hedge its foreign currency denominated net debt (comprising foreign currency borrowings and foreign currency denominated inter-company loans and borrowings), and reduce to its sensitivity to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates.


The following table presents a break down of the foreign exchange exposure as of December 31, 2005 of Veolia Environnement SA’s foreign currency denominated net debt, taking into account currency derivatives:  


 

VE Holding company foreign currency denominated net debt

Open position
in € million

Impact of a 10% change in exchange rates against the euro

GBP

6.6

9.6

1.0

PLN

30.1

7.8

0.8

USD

4.1

3.5

0.3

SEK

23.9

2.5

0.3

Other (€ million equivalent)

(3.4)

(3.4)

(0.4)

Total

NA

20.0

2.0


The above table shows that a 10% increase in all foreign currencies against the euro would generate foreign exchange gains of €2 million.




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 79



Back to contents


Exposure to Commodity Risk


Fuel prices can be subject to significant fluctuations. Nonetheless, our activities have not been materially affected and are not expected to be materially affected in the future by the cost or availability of fuel or other commodities, as the contracts we enter into generally include price review and/or indexation clauses which enable us to pass on the majority of any increases in commodity or fuel prices to the price of services sold to customers, even if this may be performed with a time delay.


As part of their supply management and cost optimization, certain entities within our group may be required to contract forward purchases or sales of electricity. The accounting treatment of such forward contracts is described in Note 1-22 to our consolidated financial statements. As of December 31, 2005, the related fair value of derivative instruments totaled €33.8 million in assets and €25.2 million in liabilities and did not qualify for hedge accounting. These contracts concern commitments to purchase electricity between 2006 and 2013 for an amount of €322.5 million on year end measurement assumptions basis and commitments to sell electricity between 2006 and 2009 for an amount of €192.5 million on the same measurement assumptions basis in accordance with the following schedule:


 

Notional amount of contracts by maturity

(€ million)

Amount

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Purchase commitments

322.5

73.5

179.3

69.7

Sale commitments

192.5

74.3

118.2

-


Exposure to Equity Risk


As of December 31, 2005, we held 15,990,242 of our own shares with a market value of €611.5 million, including €453 million offset against equity. As part of our cash management, we hold UCITS shares. Those UCITS are considered as monetary UCITS and are not subject to equity risks.


ITEM 12: DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

Not Applicable.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 80163



Back to contentsContents


PART II

ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES

None.

ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures


We carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2005.2007. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon our evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 20052007 were effective to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports that it files under the Exchange Ac t is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the U. S.U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.


Internal Controls


OrganizationReport of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting:


In 2004, we created an internal control department with respect to financial matters. The internal control departmentManagement of the Company is responsible for coordinatingestablishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13A-15(f). Management assessed the workeffectiveness of other departmentsinternal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007 based on the framework in identifying, standardizing“Internal Control — Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.


Based on that assessment, management has concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2007 to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of its financial reporting and making more reliable the key processespreparation of its financial statements for producingexternal purposes, in compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board and as adopted by the European Union.


Due to its inherent limitations, internal control over financial information within our group.reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements, and can only provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control department employs a network ofover financial reporting has been audited by KPMG SA and Ernst & Young et Autres, independent registered public accounting firms, as stated in their report on the Company’s internal control personnel present in each division and operating unit.  It carries out its work with three main objectives:over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, which is included herein.


·

identifying and formalizing the key processes for developing financial information, which are then summarized and broadly distributed throughout all levels of the group;164

·


Back to Contents

harmonizing financial management systems relating to their implementation;

·

ensuring that employees possess the requisite skills and have the necessary resources at their disposal to effectively produce the group’s financial information.

The internal control department relies initially on the effective management of all of the group’s business procedures, including non-finance related procedures (commercial, technical, human resource, legal and economic).  It follows up with a rigorous evaluation of the application of the group’s rules, overseen by the internal audit department.

Beginning with the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006, Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 will require us to include in our annual report on Form 20-F aFor an attestation report of management evaluating our internal controls over financial reporting. As a result, we launched a process in 2005 that should allow usindependent registered public accounting firms, see the report of KPMG SA and Ernst & Young et Autres, independent registered public accounting firms, included under “Item 18. Financial Statements” on page F-2.


There were no changes to evaluate internal controls at the group level by December 31, 2006. In 2005, a set of questionnaires and tests was sent to more than 350 subsidiaries. The internal audit and internal control departments then analyzed the results, in liaison with relevant department heads where necessary.

The analysis focused on an assessment of the following criteria:

·

potential impact on internal financial control;

·

level of dissemination (percentage of entities indicating a risk and verification of the significance of the entities concerned).

On this basis, action plans were implemented.  These relate principally to the documentation of financial procedures, the separation of tasks and information technology security. These procedures are being overseen by a steering committee, which is chaired by the senior executive vice president.

French Descriptive Report on Internal Controls

Under French law, we are required to publish descriptions of the material elements of our internal control procedures, as such proceduresover financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Annual Report that have materially affected, or are defined under French regulations. The French report is not the equivalent of the report we will be requiredreasonably likely to file under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 beginning with the annual report to be filed in 2007 for the year ending December 31, 2006. An English translation ofmaterially affect, our French report is filed as an exhibit to this annual report.internal control over financial reporting.


 

ITEM 16A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

Our board of directors has determined that the three current members of our accounts and audit committee, Messrs. Jean Azema*Murray Stuart (chairman of the accounts and audit committee), Jean-Marc Espalioux*,Espalioux, and Paul-Louis Girardot, and Murray Stuart* qualify as “audit committee financial experts” within the meaning of this Item 16A, three16A.  All of whom are independent(*) based on criteria set forth in the board’s charter (and all of whomthem are deemed to be independent based on criteria set forth in our board of directors’ charter, as well as based on the criteria of the NYSE manual).Listed Company Manual.  

ITEM 16B. CODE OF ETHICS

We have adopted a code of ethics, as defined in Item 16.B.16B. of Form 20-F under the Exchange Act. Our code of ethics applies to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer and other officers performing similar functions, as designated from time to time. Our code of ethics was filed as an exhibit to our annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003, and is incorporated by reference herein.  We will disclose any amendment to the provisions of such code of ethics or any waiver that our board of directors may grant.  


ITEM 16C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Pursuant to French law, we have engaged two independent accounting firms to audit our financial statements and provide related services permissible under applicable French and U.S. laws and regulations.  In respect of fiscal year 2005,2007, our independent auditors are Barbier Frinault & Autres Ernst & Young a memberet Autres and KPMG SA, which was appointed statutory auditor in replacement of the Ernst & Young group since September 2002, and Salustro Reydel a member of KPMG International.in 2007.  In accordance with French law, we consider each of these auditing firms as our principal accountants.  During 2005,2007, we paid total fees of €19.7€23.7 million to KPMG and €16.9€22.9 million to Ernst & Young for the services described below.

Audit Fees

During 2005,2007, we paid €13.1€16.5 million in fees to KPMG and €13.0€16.8 million to Ernst & Young for professional audit services relating to the audit of our financial statements and other services normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.  During 2004,2006, we paid €12.2€14.4 million in fees to KPMG and €11.8€14.5 million to Ernst & Young in connection with such services.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 81



Back to contents


Audit-Related Fees

During 2005,2007, we paid €6.6€7.2 million in fees to KPMG and €3.9€6.1 million to Ernst & Young for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the financial statements and not reported under “Audit Fees” above, including for comfort letters issued by our auditors in connection with our offerings of securities, certifications to third parties,certification services not required by regulation and acquisition-related audits and specific review on the IFRS implementation project.audits.  During 2004,2006, we paid €4.9€7.3 million in fees to KPMG and €7.3€5.6 million to Ernst & Young in connection with such services.

Tax Fees

During 2005,2006 and 2007, we did not pay any fees to KPMG or to Ernst & Young for services related to tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.  During 2004, we paid €0.4 million in fees to Ernst & Young (and no fees to KPMG) in connection with such services.  Of this €0.4 million in fees, €0.3 million related to tax audits for foreign subsidiaries and €0.1 million related to tax compliance review.    

All Other Fees

During 20042006 and 2005,2007, we did not pay any fees to KPMG or to Ernst & Young for products and services other than the ones noted above.



165



Back to Contents


Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Our accounts and audit committee is responsible, among other matters, for the oversight of our independent statutory auditors subject to the requirements of French law. Our accounts and audit committee has established a list of prohibited non-audit services in order to ensure the independence of our independent statutory auditors. Our accounts and audit committee has also adopted a policy and established certain procedures for the approval of audit and permissible non-audit services and for the pre-approval of audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided by our independent statutory auditors. During 2005, our accounts and audit committee established an annual budget, broken down and detailed as to the type of service to be provided and the authorized amount for such service, for all permissible audit and non-audit services (including on-going non-audit engagements). Our accounts and audit committee also delegated to its chairman or one of its other members the responsibility for pre-approving any new permissible audit or non-audit engagements that exceeded such budgeted amounts for the particular permissible audit or non-audit service. Any engagements pre-approved by the chairman or other delegate must be reported to the full audit committee at its next succeeding meeting.


During 2005,2007, no services were provided to our company by our independent statutory auditors pursuant to the de minimis exception to the pre-approval requirement provided by paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.


ITEM 16D. EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES

Not Applicable.

ITEM 16E. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

In 2005, neither our company nor any affiliated purchasers made any2007, the following purchases of our shares.shares were made by our company:

Period

Total number of shares purchased

Average price paid per share (in euros)

Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs

Maximum amount that may be allocated to the purchase of shares under the plans or programs (in euros)

01/01/2007 to 01/31/2007

0

n/a

0

1,500,000,000

02/01/2007 to 02/28/2007

0

n/a

0

1,500,000,000

03/01/2007 to 03/31/2007

0

n/a

0

1,500,000,000

04/01/2007 to 04/30/2007

0

n/a

0

1,500,000,000

05/01/2007 to 05/31/2007

0

n/a

0

1,500,000,000

06/01/2007 to 06/30/2007

0

n/a

0

1,500,000,000

07/01/2007 to 07/31/2007

0

n/a

0

1,500,000,000

08/01/2007 to 08/31/2007

0

n/a

0

1,500,000,000

09/01/2007 to 09/30/2007

0

n/a

0

1,500,000,000

10/01/2007 to 10/31/2007

0

n/a

0

1,500,000,000

11/01/2007 to 11/30/2007

0

n/a

0

1,500,000,000

12/01/2007 to 12/31/2007

0

n/a

0

1,500,000,000


At the general shareholders’ meeting held on May 11, 2006, our shareholders approved a share repurchase program that authorized us to purchase, sell and transfer its shares at any time and by any means, on the market or over-the-counter, including through block trades, issuance of convertible securities and combinations of financial derivative instruments granting rights to our shares by means of conversion, exchange, reimbursement, exercise of warrants or other instruments, in an amount of up to 10% of our share capital. In addition, we may not hold more than 10% of our share capital at any time.  The maximum repurchase price under the program was fixed by shareholders at €60per share and the maximum amount that we may allocate to the share repurchase program was set at €1.5 billion.  This program expired on May 10, 2007, when it was replaced by a new program aut horized by our shareholders, as described in “Item 10. Additional Information—Trading in Our Own Shares.”

The shareholders’ authorization for this 2007 share repurchase program is due to expire at the latest on November 10, 2008, which is 18 months after the date of the shareholders’ meeting that approved the program, unless superseded by a new program that may be adopted at our general shareholders’ meeting of May 7, 2008.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 82166



Back to contentsContents



PART III

ITEM 17: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Not Applicable.

ITEM 18: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

INDEX TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Page

ReportReports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms

F-1

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20052007, 2006 and 20042005

F-2F-3

Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 20052007, 2006 and 20042005

F-3F-5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 20052007, 2006 and 20042005

F-4F-6

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity Recognized Income and Expense
for the Years Ended December 31, 20052007, 2006 and 20042005

F-5F-8

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

F-6F-9


ITEM 19: EXHIBITS

The following exhibits are included herein:


Exhibit

Number

Description


1

Articles of Association (statuts) of Veolia Environnement (unofficial(free English translation).


8

List of Subsidiaries. Included herein in Note 4945 to our consolidated financial statements.


11

Code of Ethics (previously filed as Exhibit 11 to our annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 and incorporated by reference herein).


12.1

Certifications by Henri Proglio, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Jérôme Contamine, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


13.1

Certifications by Henri Proglio, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Jérôme Contamine, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


99.115.1

ReportExcerpt of report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors for 20052007 as required by Art. 117 of the French Financial Security Law (Loi de Sécurité Financière) (English Translation)(free English translation)



15.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms.


VEOLIA - Form 20-F | 83




Back to contentsContents

167



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmsREPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS



BARBIER FRINAULT & AUTRESYear ended December 31, 2007

ERNST & YOUNG

41, rue Ybry

92576 Neuilly-sur-Seine cedex

SALUSTRO REYDEL

Membre de KPMG International

8, avenue Delcassé

75008 Paris



To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Veolia Environnement:


Environnement

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Veolia Environnement and subsidiaries (together “the Company”(the "Company") as of December 31, 20052007, 2006 and 20042005, and the related consolidated statements of income, cash flowcash-flows and changes in equityrecognized income and expenses for each of the two years then ended.in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements,statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimat esestimates made by management, andas well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flowsconsolidated cash-flows for each of the two years in the three-year period ended at December 31, 2005 and 2004,2007, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Commission for useUnion and in the European Union.


conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as adoptedissued by the EuropeanInternational Accounting Standards Board.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established inInternal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission for use in(the COSO criteria) and our report dated May 6, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion on the European Union vary in certain significant respects from accounting principles generally accepted ineffectiveness of the United States of America. Information relating to the natureCompany’s internal control over financial reporting.

Paris La Défense and effect of such differences is presented in Note 50 to the consolidated financial statements.Neuilly-sur-Seine, May 6, 2008.


As discussed in Notes 50A and 50D to the financial statements, the Company has restated its 2004 US GAAP net income and shareholders’ equity with respect to impairment of goodwill.



Neuilly-sur-Seine and Paris, France

March 30, 2006

Except with respect to Note 50 as to which the date is June 28, 2006


KPMG AUDITA division of KPMG SA

 BARBIER FRINAULT & AUTRES

ERNST & YOUNG

SALUSTRO REYDEL

Membre de KPMG International et Autres

/s/ Jean BouquotJay Nirsimloo

/s/ Patrick Gounelle

/s/ Bernard Cattenoz

/s/ Bertrand Vialatte

Jean BouquotBaudouin Griton

Patrick Gounelle

Bernard Cattenoz

Bertrand VialatteJean Bouquot








VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-1



Back to contentsContents


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS


Year ended December 31, 2007

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Veolia Environnement S.A.

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Veolia Environnement S.A.and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established inInternal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (hereafter “the COSO criteria”). Veolia Environnement S.A.'s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying report of management on internal control over financial reporting as disclosed in item 15. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding pre vention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.  

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Veolia Environnement S.A. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Veolia Environnement S.A. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, cash flows and recognized income and expenses for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and our report dated May 6, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

Paris La Défense and Neuilly-sur-Seine, May 6, 2008.

KPMG AUDITA division of KPMG SA

ERNST & YOUNG et Autres

Jay Nirsimloo

Baudouin Griton

Patrick Gounelle

Jean Bouquot



F-2



Back to Contents



CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF VEOLIA ENVIRONNEMENT


CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET


 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET - ASSETS

Notes

As of December 31,

(€ million)

 

2007

2006

2005

Goodwill

4

6,913.2

5,705.0

4,752.3

Concession intangible assets

5

2,989.2

2,345.6

2,091.8

Other intangible assets

6

1,706.4

1,379.8

1,281.4

Property, plant and equipment

7

9,203.2

7,918.7

6,885.7

Investments in associates

8

292.1

241.0

201.5

Non-consolidated investments

9

256.1

181.7

209.5

Non-current operating financial assets

10

5,272.4

5,133.4

5,337.4

Non-current derivative instruments - Assets

30

123.7

201.6

249.0

Other non-current financial assets

11

746.0

637.5

691.6

Deferred tax assets

12

1,468.1

1,355.7

1,134.7

Non-current assets

 

28,970.4

25,100.0

22,834.9

Inventories and work-in-progress

13

839.4

731.8

635.2

Operating receivables

13

12,459.4

10,968.7

10,083.3

Current operating financial assets

10

355.2

326.2

208.0

Other current financial assets

14

330.0

205.3

221.2

Marketable securities

 

-

66.4

60.7

Current derivative instruments - Assets

30

114.4

-

-

Cash & cash equivalents

15

3,115.6

2,658.0

2,336.1

Current assets

 

17,214.0

14,956.4

13,544.5

Assets classified as held for sale

 

122.5

67.3

1.6

Total assets

 

46,306.9

40,123.7

36,381.0



F-3



Back to Contents



CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET - EQUITY AND LIABILITIES

Notes

As of December 31,

(€ million)

 

2007

2006

2005

Share capital

 

2,358.8

2,063.1

2,039.4

Additional paid-in capital

 

9,179.5

6,641.2

6,499.1

Reserves and retained earnings attributable to equity holders of the parent

 

(3,925.4)

(4,343.5)

(4,748.3)

Minority interests

 

2,577.8

2,192.6

1,888.0

Equity

16

10,190.7

6,553.4

5,678.2

Non-current provisions and other debt

17

2,138.9

2,196.6

1,648.0

Other non-current liabilities

17

-

207.3

203.7

Non current borrowings

18

13,948.0

14,001.6

13,722.8

Non-current derivative instruments – Liabilities

30

163.8

145.9

154.5

Deferred tax liabilities

12

1,794.7

1,504.9

1,205.0

Non-current liabilities

 

18,045.4

18,056.3

16,934.0

Operating payables

13

12,944.8

11,268.6

10,369.8

Current provisions

17

825.7

825.9

754.0

Current borrowings

19

3,805.0

2,904.1

2,138.2

Current derivative instruments – Liabilities

30

34.0

-

-

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

20

459.4

456.0

506.8

Current liabilities

 

18,068.9

15,454.6

13,768.8

Liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale

 

1.9

59.4

-

Total equity and liabilities

 

46,306.9

40,123.7

36,381.0

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



F-4



Back to Contents



CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET - ASSETS

Notes

As of December
31, 2005
($ millions)

As of December
31, 2005
(€ millions)

As of December
31, 2004
(€ millions)

Goodwill

4

5,736.8

4,863.1

4,383.6

Other intangible assets

5

1,382.0

1,171.5

1,059.0

Property, plant and equipment

6

7,929.8

6,722.0

6,137.3

Publicly-owned utility networks

7

6,640.9

5,629.5

4,820.8

Investments in associates

8

237.7

201.5

219.2

Non-consolidated investments

9

247.1

209.5

181.1

Long-term IFRIC 4 loans

1-20 & 10

2,243.6

1,901.9

1,693.5

Derivative instruments - Assets

34

293.7

249.0

424.8

Other long-term loans and investments

11

816.9

692.5

614.7

Deferred tax assets

12

1,329.8

1,127.3

1,122.6

Non-current assets

 

26,858.3

22,767.8

20,656.6

Inventories and work-in-progress

13

762.3

646.2

562.0

Operating receivables

13

11,929.1

10,112.3

9,261.4

Short-term IFRIC 4 loans

1-20 & 14

192.9

163.5

133.0

Other short-term loans

15

260.9

221.2

333.0

Marketable securities

16

71.6

60.7

189.3

Cash and cash equivalents

17

2,755.8

2,336.1

4,660.3

Current assets

 

15,972.6

13,540.0

15,139.0

Assets of discontinued operations

 

1.9

1.6

30.3

Total assets

 

42,832.8

36,309.4

35,825.9

     

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET –
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES

Notes

As of December
31, 2005
($ millions)

As of December
31, 2005

As of December
31, 2004

Share capital

 

2,405.8

2,039.4

2,032.1

Additional paid-in capital

 

7,666.8

6,499.1

6,467.6

Reserves and retained earnings attributable to equity holders of the parent

 

-5,586.8

(4,735.9)

(5,276.9)

Minority interests

 

2,230.6

1,890.9

1,725.5

Equity

18

6,716.4

5,693.5

4,948.3

Non-current provisions

19

1,903.5

1,613.6

1,283.5

Long-term borrowings

20

16,188.2

13,722.8

12,157.0

Derivative instruments - Liabilities

34

182.3

154.5

189.8

Other non-current liabilities

21

245.1

207.8

163.8

Deferred tax liabilities

12

1,326.1

1,124.1

933.8

Non-current liabilities

 

19,845.2

16,822.8

14,727.9

Operating payables

13

12,238.1

10,374.3

9,576.0

Current provisions

19

912.8

773.8

723.0

Short-term borrowings

22

2,522.4

2,138.2

5,426.1

Bank overdrafts and other cash position item

23

597.9

506.8

420.1

Current liabilities

 

16,271.2

13,793.1

16,145.2

Liabilities of discontinued operations

 

-

-

4.5

Total equity and liabilities

 

42,832.8

36,309.4

35,825.9

CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT


(€ million)

Notes

Year ended December 31,

  

2007

2006

2005

Revenue

21

32,628.2

28,620.4

25,570.4

o/w Revenue from operating financial assets

 

345.1

351.0

325.8

Cost of sales

 

(26,929.6)

(23,427.1)

(20,869.9)

Selling costs

 

(551.3)

(515.2)

(478.5)

General and administrative expenses

 

(2,757.0)

(2,611.2)

(2,394.9)

Other operating revenue and expenses

 

106.6

66.0

65.8

Operating income

22

2,496.9

2,132.9

1,892.9

Finance costs

23

(969.6)

(783.8)

(774.0)

Finance income

23

152.5

82.8

63.3

Other financial income and expenses

24

1.4

(34.0)

28.1

Income tax expense

25

(420.1)

(409.6)

(422.4)

Share of net income of associates

8 & 26

16.9

6.0

6.5

Net income from continuing operations

 

1,278.0

994.3

794.4

Net income from discontinued operations

27

(23.2)

0.6

0.7

Net income for the year

 

1,254.8

994.9

795.1

Minority interests

28

326.9

236.2

172.9

Attributable to equity holders of the parent

 

927.9

758.7

622.2

     

(in euros)

    

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent per share

29

   

Diluted

 

2.13

1.89

1.56

Basic

 

2.16

1.90

1.57

Net income from continuing operations attributable to equity holders of the parent per share

29

   

Diluted

 

2.19

1.88

1.56

Basic

 

2.21

1.90

1.57


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

For the convenience of the reader, the financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005 have been translated into U.S. Dollars at the rate of U.S. $ 1 = €0.8477.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-2F-5



Back to contents




CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT


 

Notes

For the year ended December 31,

2005
($ millions)

2005
(€ millions)

%

2004
(€ millions)

%

Revenue

24

29,780.4

25,244.9

100.0%

22,500.3

100.0%

o/w Revenue from third-party financing activities

 

148.4

125.8

 

96.7

 

Cost of sales

 

-24,255.0

(20,561.0)

 

(18,346.3)

 

Selling costs

 

-564.5

(478.5)

 

(439.7)

 

General and administrative expenses

 

-2,834.7

(2,403.0)

 

(2,236.4)

 

Other operating revenue and expenses

 

106.8

90.5

 

2.7

 

Operating income

25

2,233.0

1,892.9

7.5%

1,480.6

6.6%

Finance costs, net

26

-841.6

(713.4)

 

(732.1)

 

Other financial income (expenses)

27

36.0

30.5

 

46.1

 

Income tax expense

28

-498.9

(422.9)

 

(184.1)

 

Share of net income of associates

29 & 8

17.6

14.9

 

24.2

 

Net income (expense) from continuing operations

 

946.1

802.0

3.2%

634.7

2.8%

Net income (expense) from discontinued operations

30

-

-

 

(105.7)

 

Net income (expense) for the year

 

946.1

802.0

3.2%

529.0

2.3%

Attributable to minority interests

31

211.2

179.0

 

137.5

 

Attributable to Equity holders of the parent

32

734.9

623.0

2.5%

391.5

1.7%

       

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent per share

33

     

Diluted

 

1.9

1.59

 

0.99

 

Basic

 

1.9

1.60

 

0.99

 

Net income from continuing operations per share

33

     

Diluted

 

2.4

2.04

 

1.60

 

Basic

 

2.4

2.05

 

1.60

 
       


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

For the convenience of the reader, the financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005 have been translated into U.S. Dollars at the rate of U.S. $ 1 = €0.8477.




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-3



Back to contentsContents



CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT


 

Notes

For the year ended December 31,

 

2005
($ millions)

2005
(€ millions)

2004
(€ millions)

Net income for the year attributable to equity holders of the parent

32

734.9

623.0

391.5

Minority interests

31

211.2

179.0

216.4

Operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses

25

2,158.0

1,829.3

2,041.5

Financial amortization and impairment losses

27

-24.8

(21.0)

(38.2)

Gains (losses) on disposal and dilution

 

-82.6

(70.0)

(161.3)

Share of net income of associates

29 & 8

-17.6

(14.9)

(24.2)

Dividends received

27

-7.7

(6.5)

(6.0)

Finance costs, net

26

841.6

713.4

732.1

Income tax expense

28

498.9

422.9

309.5

Other

 

37.9

32.1

(0.7)

Operating cash flow before changes in working capital

 

4,349.8

3,687.3

3,460.6

Changes in working capital

13

-61.6

(52.2)

294.4

Income taxes paid

 

-399.7

(338.8)

(238.0)

Net cash flow from operating activities

 

3,888.5

3,296.3

3,517.0

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

 

-2,455.9

(2,081.9)

(1,964.0)

Proceeds on disposal of property, plant and equipment

 

204.7

173.5

316.2

Purchases of investments

 

-1,113.8

(944.1)

(334.0)

Proceeds on disposal of investments

 

181.7

154.0

2,184.2

IFRIC 4 investment contracts:

 

0.0

  

New IFRIC 4 loans

10 & 14

-317.7

(269.3)

(177.0)

Principal payments on IFRIC 4 loans

10 & 14

217.1

184.0

130.0

Dividends received

8 & 27

19.8

16.8

23.5

New long-term loans granted

11

-73.3

(62.1)

(132.5)

Principal payments on long-term loans

11

65.7

55.7

129.4

Net decrease in short-term loans

15

135.7

115.0

41.1

Sales and purchases of marketable securities

16

139.4

118.2

(42.3)

Net cash from (used in) investing activities

 

-2,996.6

(2,540.2)

174.6

Net increase in short-term borrowings

22

-3,463.7

(2,936.2)

1,789.2

New long-term borrowings and other debt

20 & 21

3,697.1

3,134.1

930.5

Principal payments on long-term borrowings and other debt

20 & 21

-2,735.5

(2,318.9)

(3,468.7)

Proceeds on issue of shares

 

95.6

81.0

167.2

Purchase of treasury shares

 

0.0

-

(183.2)

Dividends paid

 

-441.2

(374.0)

(389.6)

Interest paid

 

-871.5

(738.8)

(640.9)

Net cash used in financing activities

 

-3,719.2

(3,152.8)

(1,795.5)

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year

 

5,002.0

4,240.2

2,320.6

Effect of foreign exchange rate changes

 

-16.7

(14.2)

23.5

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year

 

2,158.0

1,829.3

4,240.2

Cash and cash equivalents

17

2,755.9

2,336.1

4,660.3

- Bank overdrafts and other cash position item

23

597.9

506.8

420.1

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year

 

2,158.0

1,829.3

4,240.2

(€ million)

Notes

Year ended December 31,

  

2007

2006

2005

Net income for the year attributable to equity holders of the parent

 

927.9

758.7

622.2

Minority interests

28

326.9

236.2

172.9

Operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses

22

1,816.7

1,831.0

1,690.7

Financial amortization and impairment losses

 

8.0

9.4

(21.0)

Gains (losses) on disposal and dilution

 

(173.5)

(73.3)

(70.0)

Share of net income of associates

8 & 26

(16.9)

(6.0)

(14.9)

Dividends received

24

(8.8)

(9.7)

(6.5)

Finance costs and finance income

23

817.1

701.0

712.4

Income tax expense

25

420.1

357.1

422.4

Other items (including IFRS2)

 

101.9

40.0

33.7

Operating cash flow before changes in working capital

 

4,219.4

3,844.4

3,541.9

Changes in working capital

13

(167.1)

(111.8)

(39.4)

Income taxes paid

 

(417.7)

(343.0)

(338.8)

Net cash from operating activities

 

3,634.6

3,389.6

3,163.7

Capital expenditure

22

(2,518.7)

(2,017.6)

(1,837.1)

Proceeds on disposal of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment

 

212.9

141.3

168.8

Purchases of investments

 

(1,835.4)

(1,291.5)

(944.1)

Proceeds on disposal of financial assets

 

181.7

206.7

154.0

Operating financial assets:

10

   

New operating financial assets

 

(404.1)

(360.6)

(513.4)

Principal payments on operating financial assets

 

360.7

438.1

320.6

Dividends received

8 & 24

15.3

13.8

16.8

New non current loans granted

11

(65.0)

(69.4)

(62.1)

Principal payments on non current loans

11

61.6

29.2

55.7

Net decrease (increase) in current loans

14

(27.4)

2.6

115.0

Sales and purchases of marketable securities

 

-

3.4

118.2


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

For the convenience of the reader, the financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005 have been translated into U.S. Dollars at the rate of U.S. $ 1 = €0.8477.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-4F-6



Back to contentsContents



(€ million)

Notes

Year ended December 31,

  

2007

2006

2005

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(4,018.4)

(2,904.0)

(2,407.6)

Net increase/(decrease) in current borrowings

19

(1,534.5)

(239.2)

(2,936.2)

New non current borrowings and other debt

18

2,060.4

1,997.2

3,134.8

Principal payments on non current borrowings and other debt

18

(1,362.9)

(1,000.8)

(2,319.6)

Proceeds on issue of shares

 

3,039.2

246.5

81.0

(Purchase)/Proceeds of treasury shares

 

18.9

0.4

-

Dividends paid

 

(564.3)

(479.2)

(374.0)

Interest paid

 

(716.0)

(596.4)

(738.8)

Net cash from (used in) financing activities

 

940.8

(71.5)

(3,152.8)

Net cash at the beginning of the year

 

2,202.0

1,829.3

4,240.2

Effect of foreign exchange rate changes

 

(102.8)

(41.4)

(14.2)

Net cash at the end of the year

 

2,656.2

2,202.0

1,829.3

Cash & cash equivalents

15

3,115.6

2,658.0

2,336.1

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

20

459.4

456.0

506.8

Net cash at the end of the year

 

2,656.2

2,202.0

1,829.3


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY


(€ million)

Share capital

Additional paid-in capital

Treasury shares

Consolidated reserves and retained earnings

Foreign  exchange Translation reserves

Fair value reserves

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

Minority interests

Total equity

As of January 1, 2004

2,025.3

6,449.1

(298.6)

(4,838.7)

-

(65.7)

3,271.4

1,638.8

4,910.2

Issue of share capital of the parent company

6.8

18.5

-

-

-

-

25.3

-

25.3

Elimination of treasury shares

-

-

(160.7)

 

-

-

(160.7)

-

(160.7)

Share options

-

-

-

6.9

-

-

6.9

-

6.9

Third party share in share capital increases by subsidiaries and changes in consolidation scope

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

88.6

88.6

Parent company dividend distribution

-

-

-

(217.9)

-

-

(217.9)

-

(217.9)

Third party share in dividend distributions by subsidiaries

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(144.2)

(144.2)

Foreign exchange translation adjustments

-

-

-

-

(72.1)

-

(72.1)

10.9

(61.2)

Fair value adjustments

-

-

-

-

-

(13.9)

(13.9)

(9.9)

(23.8)

Actuarial gains (losses) on pension obligations

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Net income for the year

-

-

-

391.5

-

-

391.5

137.5

529.0

Other changes

-

-

-

(7.7)

-

-

(7.7)

3.8

(3.9)

As of January 1, 2005

2,032.1

6,467.6

(459.3)

(4,665.9)

(72.1)

(79.6)

3,222.8

1,725.5

4,948.3

Issue of share capital of the parent company

7.3

31.5

-

8.6

-

-

47.4

-

47.4

Elimination of treasury shares

-

-

6.6

2.6

-

-

9.2

-

9.2

Share options

-

-

-

16.2

-

-

16.2

-

16.2

Third party share in share capital increases by subsidiaries and changes in consolidation scope

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

116.5

116.5

Parent company dividend distribution

-

-

-

(265.4)

-

-

(265.4)

-

(265.4)

Third party share in dividend distributions by subsidiaries

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(108.6)

(108.6)

Foreign exchange translation adjustments

-

-

-

-

276.1

-

276.1

33.6

309.7

Fair value adjustments

-

-

-

-

-

9.7

9.7

1.6

11.3

Actuarial gains (losses) on pension obligations

-

-

-

(132.5)

-

-

(132.5)

(12.2)

(144.7)

Net income for the year

-

-

-

623.0

-

-

623.0

179.0

802.0

Other changes

-

-

-

(18.0)

-

14.1

(3.9)

(44.5)

(48.4)

As of December 31, 2005

2,039.4

6,499.1

(452.7)

(4,431.4)

204.0

(55.8)

3,802.6

1,890.9

5,693.5

As of December 31, 2005 ($ millions)

2,405.8

7,666.8

-534.0

-5,227.7

240.7

-65.8

4,485.8

2,230.6

6,716.4


The dividend distributionDiscontinued operations as per share was €0.68the definition of IFRS 5 contributed -€5.9 million, -€10 million and €0.55+€8.9 million to net cash from operating activities, -€126.7 million, +€12.2 million and +€5.4 million to net cash from investing activities and +2.7 million, +€10.3 million and - €4.4 million to net cash from financing activities in 20052007, 2006 and 20042005 respectively.


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


For the convenience of the reader, the financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005 have been translated into U.S. Dollars at the rate of U.S. $ 1 = €0.8477.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-5F-7



Back to contentsContents



STATEMENT OF RECOGNIZED INCOME AND EXPENSE


(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Net income for the year

1,254.8

994.9

795.1

Actuarial gains or losses on pension obligations

88.0

25.6

(144.7)

Fair value adjustments on available-for-sale assets

33.7

(2.3)

(2.4)

Fair value adjustments on cash flow hedge derivative instruments

8.8

37.0

13.7

Foreign exchange gains and losses:

   

- on the translation of the financial statements of subsidiaries drawn up in a foreign currency

(251.5)

(92.3)

331.8

- on the net financing of foreign investments

(5.5)

(7.8)

(13.8)

Income and expenses recognized directly in equity

(126.5)

(39.8)

184.7

Total income and expenses recognized

1,128.3

955.1

979.8

Attributable to equity holders of the parent

778.5

712.2

783.8

Attributable to minority interests

349.8

242.9

195.9

Impact of changes in accounting method on retained earnings as of January 1 (IAS1.96 (d))

-

(15.3)

(8.4)



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



F-8



Back to Contents


Note 1NOTE 1.


Accounting principles and methods


1-1.1.1

BasisPreparation of preparation as of December 31, 2005the 2007 financial statements

In accordance with European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No. 1606/No.1606/2002 of July 19, 2002 and European Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1725/No.1725/2003 of September 29, 2003, the Veolia Environnement consolidated financial statements forare, since the year ended December 31, 2005, are the first financial statements preparedpresented in accordance with InternationalIFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS),Standards) as adopted by the European Union and IFRS as published by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).

In the absence of IFRS standards or interpretations and adopted byin accordance with IAS 8, Veolia Environnement has used other standard references and in particular U.S. standards.

Veolia Environnement SA and its subsidiaries (hereinafter referred to as the European Union.“Group”) have applied for the first time IFRS 7 on financial instrument disclosures and the amendment to IAS 1 on capital disclosures.

TheVeolia Environnement does not consider that the implementation of the following interpretations had a material impact as of December 31, 2007:

IFRIC 7,Applying the restatement approach under IAS 29 – Financial reporting in hyperinflationary economies

IFRIC 8,Scope of IFRS 2 – Share-based payment

IFRIC 9,  Reassessment of embedded derivatives

IFRIC 10,Interim financial statements are presentedreporting and impairment

Due to changes in millionthe Group, a certain number of euro, roundedbalance sheet headings have been amended to enable a more relevant analysis of the nearest whole number.accounts, consistent with changes in the standards base over recent years. These amendments did not impact either equity or net income for the year.

The accounting methods presented below have been applied consistently for all periods presented in the consolidated financial statements and for the IFRS opening balance sheet as of January 1, 2004 for the purposes of IFRS transition.statements.

The consolidated financial statements are presented usingon the basis of historical cost convention,, with the exception of assets and liabilities recognized at fair value: derivative instruments, financial instruments held for trading, financial instruments designated at fair value and available-for-sale financial instruments.

The consolidated financial statements have been drawn up ininstruments (in accordance with IFRS adopted by the European Union as of December 31, 2005IAS 32 and do not differ from the application of all IFRS published by the IASB at this date.IAS 39).

The Veolia Environnement consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20052007 were approvedclosed by the Board of Directors on March 9, 2006.6, 2008 and will be presented at approval to the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders on May 7, 2008.

1.2


Basis of presentation as of December 31, 2007

The consolidated financial statements are presented in millions of euro, unless stated otherwise.

The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of Veolia Environnement SA and its subsidiaries as of December 31 each year. The financial statements of subsidiaries are drawn up for the same reference period as those of the parent company, in accordance with uniform accounting policies and methods.

All inter-company balances and transactions, together with all income and expense items and unrealized gains and losses included in the net carrying amount of assets, resulting from internal transactions, are eliminated in full.

Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date of acquisition, which is the date on which the Group obtains control, up to the date on which it ceases to exercise control.

Minority interests represent the part of net income or loss and of net assets not held by the Group. They are presented separately in the Income Statement and separately from equity attributable to equity holders of the parent in Equity in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

1-2.

Preparation of 2004 comparative figures in accordance with IFRS

To enable the publication of its comparative statements for fiscal year 2005 and in accordance with the recommendation issued by the French financial markets authority, the AMF, on financial communications during the transition period, Veolia Environnement prepared 2004 financial information on the transition to IFRS, presenting preliminary information on the expected quantified impact of IFRS adoption on opening equity, the financial position as of December 31, 2004 and results for the first-half of 2004 and the full fiscal year.

The expected quantified impact on the opening equity, the financial position as of December 31, 2004 and the results of 2004 was published by Veolia Environnement in the update (filed on May 25, 2005) to the Reference Document filed with the AMF on April 5, 2005.

The impact of IFRS transition on the Group’s financial position, results and cash flow of the group is presented in note 48.

This 2004 financial information on the expected quantified impact of IFRS adoption was prepared by adjusting 2004 figures in line with those IFRS standards and interpretations that Veolia Environnement applied for the preparation of the comparative consolidated statements as of December 31, 2005. The 2004 financial information detailed below is based on the following:

IFRS standards and interpretations subject to mandatory application as of December 31, 2005, as known to date ;

IFRS standards and interpretations subject to mandatory application post 2005, that the Group has decided to adopt early where this is encouraged;

Elected options and exemptions that the Group applies for the preparation of its first IFRS consolidated financial statements in 2005.

The consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005 are the first financial statements presented in accordance with IFRS, as adopted by the European Union. They are presented with 2004 comparative figures prepared in accordance with the same standards base, pursuant to IFRS 1 (adopted by European Commission Regulation (EC) No. 707/2004 of April 6, 2004) on first-time adoption of IFRS.

IFRS 1 offers a number of options on first-time adoption of IFRS. Veolia Environnement has elected to apply the following options:

Business combinations performed prior to the transition date are not retrospectively restated,

Accumulated actuarial differences as of January 1, 2004 related to pension obligations are recorded in equity,

Accumulated foreign exchange translation adjustments as of January 1, 2004 are reclassified definitively in consolidated reserves,

Retention of the historical cost method for intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, without remeasurement at fair value,

Add-back of discounted receivables (“Dailly” sales) as of January 1, 2004.

For all other IFRS, the restatement of asset and liability values as of January 1, 2004 has been performed retrospectively as if these standards had always been applied.

Furthermore, Veolia Environnement has opted for early adoption, as of January 1, 2004, of the following standards:

IAS 32 and IAS 39 on financial instruments (European Commission Regulation (EC) No. 2086/2004 of November 19, 2004 and European Commission Regulation (EC) No. 2237/2004 of December 29, 2004),

IFRS 5 on discontinued operations (European Commission Regulation (EC) No. 2236/2004 of December 23, 2004), and

IFRIC 4-Determining whether an arrangement contains a lease.


1-3.

F-9



Back to Contents


1.3

Principles of Consolidation

Veolia Environnement fully consolidates all entities over which it exercises control. Control is defined as the ability to govern, directly or indirectly, the financial and operating policies of an entity in order to obtain the benefit of its activities.

The financial statements of subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements from the effective date of control up to the date control ceases.

Companies in which Veolia Environnement exercises significant influence over financial and operating policies are accounted for using the equity method. Significant influence is presumed to exist where the Group holds at least 20% of share capital or voting rights.

Companies over which Veolia Environnement exercises joint control as a result of a contractual agreement between partners are consolidated using the proportionate method.method in accordance with IAS 31.

Pursuant to Standing Interpretations Committee (SIC)SIC 12,Special Purpose Entities (SPEs) are consolidated when the substance of the relationship between the SPE and Veolia Environnement or its subsidiaries indicates that the SPE is controlled by Veolia Environnement. Control may arise through the predetermination of the activities of the SPE or through the fact that, in substance, the financial and operating policies are defined by Veolia Environnement or Veolia Environnement benefits from most of the economic advantages and/or assumes most of the economic risks related to the activity of the SPE.

Pursuant to IAS 27, potential voting rights available for exercise attached to financial instruments which, if exercised, would confer voting rights onto Veolia Environnement and its subsidiaries, are taken into account where necessary in assessing the level of percentage control or significant influence exercised.

Finally, the Group continues to apply the proportionate method of consolidation in accordance with IAS 31.




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-6



Back to contents


1-4.1.4

Translation of Foreign Subsidiaries' Financial Statements (IAS 21)foreign subsidiaries’ financial statements

Balance sheets, income statements and cash flow statements of subsidiaries whose functional currency is different from that of the Group are translated into the reporting currency at the applicable rate of exchange (i.e., the year-end rate for balance sheet items and the average annual rate for income statement and cash flow items). Translation gains and lossesThe foreign exchange translation are recorded in equity. The exchange rates of the major currencies of non-euro countries used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements were as follows:


Year-end exchange rate(one foreign currency unit = €xx)

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

 Average annual exchange rate
(one foreign currency unit = €xx)

Average rate2005

Average rate2004

As of

December 31,

2007

As of

December 31,

2006

As of

December 31,

2005

U.S. Dollar

0.8477

0.7342

U.S. Dollar

0.8078

0.8025

0.6793

0.7593

0.8477

Pound Sterling

1.4592

1.4183

Pound Sterling

1.4640

1.4721

1.3636

1.4892

1.4592

Czech Crowns

0.0345

0.0328

Czech Crowns

0.0336

0.0314

Czech Crown

0.0376

0.0364

0.0345

   

Average annual exchange rate

(one foreign currency unit = €xx)

Average annual rate

2007

Average annual rate

2006

Average annual rate

2005

U.S. Dollar

0.7248

0.7918

0.8078

Pound Sterling

1.4550

1.4665

1.4640

Czech Crown

0.0361

0.0354

0.0336



1-5.1.5

Foreign currency transactions (IAS 21 – IAS 39)

Foreign currency transactions are translated into euro at the exchange rate prevailing at the transaction date. At the year-end,year end, foreign currency denominatedcurrency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured in euro at year-end exchange rates. The resulting foreign exchange gains and losses are recorded in net income for the period.



F-10



Back to Contents


Loans to a subsidiary the settlement of which is neither planned nor probable in the foreseeable future represent, in substance, a portion of the Group’s net investment in this foreign operation. Foreign exchange gains and losses on monetary items forming part of a net investment are recognized directly in equity as foreign exchange translation adjustments and are released to income on the disposal of the net investment.

Exchange gains and losses on foreign currency denominatedcurrency-denominated borrowings or on foreign currency derivatives that qualify as hedges of net investments in foreign subsidiaries, are recognized directly in equity as foreign exchange translation adjustments. Amounts recognized in equity are released to income on the sale of the relevant investment.

Foreign currency denominatedcurrency-denominated non-monetary assets and liabilities recognized at historical cost are translated using the exchange rate prevailing as of the transaction date. Foreign currency denominatedcurrency-denominated non-monetary assets and liabilities recognized at fair value are translated using the exchange rate prevailing as of the date the fair value is determined.


In the case of a net investment in a foreign operation, foreign exchange gains or losses on loans denominated in a currency that is not the functional currency of the lending or borrowing company must be recognized in foreign exchange translation reserves. The impact on the Veolia Environnement consolidated financial statements is not material.

1-6.1.6

Property, plant and equipment (IAS16 and IAS 17)

Property, plant and equipment are recorded at historical acquisition cost to the Group, less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses.

Property, plant and equipment are recorded by component, with each component depreciated over its useful life.

Useful lives are as follows:


Range of useful lives in number of years *

Buildings

20 to 50

Technical systems

7 to 24

Vehicles

3 to 25

Other plant and equipment

3 to 12

* The range of useful lives is due to the diversity of property, plant and equipment concerned

Borrowing costs attributable to the acquisition or construction of identified installations, incurred during the construction period, are included in the cost of those assets in accordance with IAS 23.23,Borrowing costs.

Investment grants are deducted fromA finance lease contract is a contract that transfers to the gross carrying amountGroup substantially all the risks and rewards related to the ownership of property, plant and equipment to which they relate.an asset.

Pursuant to IAS 17,Leases, assets financed by finance lease are recorded in property, plant and equipment at the present value of minimum lease payments less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses or, if lower, fair value and depreciated over the shorter of the lease term and the expected useful life of the assets, unless it is reasonably certain that the asset will become the property of the lessee at the end of the contract. A finance lease contract is a contract which transfers to the Group substantially all the risks and rewards related to the ownership of an asset.

Given the nature of the Group's businesses, the Divisionssubsidiaries do not own investment property.property in the normal course of their operations.



F-11



Back to Contents


1-7.1.7

Government grants (IAS 20)

1.7.1

GovernmentInvestment grants finance all or part of publicly-owned utility networks. for property, plant and equipment

In principle, theseaccordance with the option offered by IAS 20, investment grants are deducted from the gross carrying amount of property, plant and equipment to which they relate.

They are recognized as a reduction in the depreciation charge over the useful life of the depreciable asset.

When the construction of an asset covers more than one period, the portion of the grant not yet used is recorded in Other liabilities in the Balance Sheet.

1.7.2

Grants relating to concession arrangements

Grants received in respect of concession arrangements (see Note 1.20 for further details) are generally definitively earned and, therefore, are not repayable.

In accordance with the option offered by IAS 20, these grants are presented as a deduction from intangible assets or financial assets depending on the valuemodel adopted on the interpretation of publicly-owned utility networks.the concession contract (IFRIC 12).

SuchUnder the intangible asset model, the grant reduces the amortization charge in respect of the concession intangible asset over the residual term of the concession contract.

Under the financial asset model, investment grants are therefore recordedequated to a means of repaying the operating financial asset.

1.7.3

Operating grants

Operating grants concern, by definition, operating items.

Where operating grants are intended to offset costs incurred, they are recognized as a deduction from the cost of goods sold over the period that matches them with related costs.

Where operating grants represent additional contractual remuneration of a recurring nature, such as contributions or compensation for inadequate revenue provided under certain public service delegation contracts, they are recognized in Revenue in the year the publicly-owned utility network is sold.revenue.


1-8.1.8

Intangible assets excluding goodwill (IAS 38)

Intangible assets are identifiable non-monetary assets without physical substance. They are recorded at acquisition cost less accumulated amortization and any accumulated impairment losses.

Intangible assets mainly consist of certain assets recognized in respect of concession arrangements (IFRIC 12), entry fees paid to local authorities for public service contracts, and amortized over the contract term, the value of contracts acquired through business combinations, the patents, licenses, software and operating rights.


1-9.1.9

Business Combinations and Goodwill (IFRS 3)

All businessBusiness combinations are recorded in accordance with the purchase accounting method. Goodwill arises on the acquisition of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures.method as set out in IFRS 3. Under this method, assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed are recorded at fair value. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed, if any, is capitalized as goodwill.

GoodwillPursuant to IFRS, goodwill is not amortized under IFRS, but subjectamortized.



F-12



Back to impairment tests performed at the level of the cash generating unit (“CGU”), at least once annually. Under IAS36, the cash generating unit is defined as a country per business segment. This is generally the level at which Veolia Environnement's management assesses operating performance.Contents


1-10.1.10

Asset impairment (IAS 36)Impairment of assets

The Group performs impairment tests on intangible assets and property, plant and equipment if there is internal or external indication of impairment loss.

Veolia Environnement performs systematic annual impairment tests in respect of goodwill and other intangible assets with an indefinite useful life following the preparation of a strategiclong-term plan, or more frequently where there is evidencean indication of impairment losses.decrease in value. In such case,cases, the long-term prospects of an activity are downgraded,reviewed, a valuation is performed and an impairment is recorded in priority against goodwill and intangible assets in interim financial reporting if necessary.

The net carrying amount of an asset or group of assets is reduced to its recoverable amount (higher of the fair value less costs to sell and the value in use), where this is less.lower.

The value in use is determined by discounting the future cash flows expected to be derived from the asset, cash generatingcash-generating unit (CGU) or group of CGUs considered, taking into account, where appropriate, the residual value, discounted using the discount rate determined for each asset, CGU or group of CGUs and corresponding to the risk-free rate plus a risk premium weighted for business-specific risks. Given the activities of the Group, cash generatingcash-generating units generally correspond to a country in each Division.

On disposal, fair value less costs to sell is estimated using the multiples method (broker surveys) or based on similar recent transactions.

Impairment losses can be reversed, with the exception of goodwill.




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-7



Back to contents


1-11.1.11

Inventories (IAS 2)

In accordance with IAS 2, inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the estimated costs of completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale.


1-12.1.12

Assets classified as held for sale and liabilities of discontinuedLiabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale, Discontinued operations

Assets classified as held for sale and liabilities of discontinued operationsdirectly associated with assets classified as held for sale are stated at the lower of their net carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell.


The net income or loss realized by discontinued operations is reported on a separate line of the Income Statement.

1-13.1.13

Provisions (IAS 37)

Pursuant to IAS 37, a provision is recorded when, at the year end, the Group has a current legal or implicit obligation to a third party as a result of a past event, and it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and the amount of the obligation can be reliably estimated.

As part of its obligations under public services contracts, the Group assumes responsibility for the maintenance and repair of installations of the publicly-owned utility networks it manages. The resulting maintenance and repair costs are analyzed in accordance with IAS 37 on provisions and, where necessary, a provision for contractual commitments is recorded where there is outstanding work to be performed.

In the event of a restructuring, an obligation exists if, prior to the period end, the restructuring has been announced and a detailed plan produced or implementation has commenced. Future operating costs are not recorded.

Provisions giving rise to a cash outflow after more than 1 year are discounted if the impact is material. The unwinding of discount is recorded in the Income statement in “Other financial income  and expenses”.provided.

In the case of provisions for site restoration of waste storage facilities, Veolia Environnement accounts for the obligation to restore a site as hiding waste is deposited, recording a non-current asset component and taking into account inflation and the date on which expenses will be incurred (discounting). The asset is amortized based on its depletion.

Provisions giving rise to an outflow after more than one year are discounted if the impact is material. Discount rates reflect current assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the liability. The unwinding of the discount is recorded in the Income Statement in "Other financial income and expenses".



F-13



Back to Contents


1-14.1.14

Financial instruments (IAS 32 and IAS 39)


The Group applied IFRS 7 on financial instrument disclosures for the first time.

1.14.1

Financial assets and liabilities

Financial assets include assets classified as available-for-sale and held-to maturity, assets at fair value through profit and held-for-trading,loss, asset derivative instruments, loans and receivables and cash and cash equivalents.

Financial liabilities include borrowings, other financing and bank overdrafts, liability derivative instruments and operating liabilities.payables.

The recognition and measurement of financial assets and liabilities is governed by IAS 39-39,Financial instruments: recognition and measurement.


1.14.2

Recognition and accountingmeasurement of financial assets

Financial assets are recognized at the settlement date. Financial assets are initially recognized at fair value, net of transaction costs. In the case of assets measured at fair value through profit and loss, transaction costs are expensed directly to net income.

The Group classifies financial assets in one of the four categories identified by IAS 39 on the acquisition date:

Held-to-maturity assets

Held-to-maturity assets are financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturity,maturities, other than loans and receivables that the Group acquires with the positive intention and ability to hold to maturity. After initial recognition at fair value, held-to-maturity assets are recognized and measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.

Held-to-maturity assets are reviewed for objective evidence of impairment. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of the financial asset exceeds its recoverable amount, as estimated during impairment tests.testing. The impairment loss is recognized in the Income statement.Statement.

Net gains and losses on held-to-maturity assets consist of interest income and impairment losses.

Available-for-sale assets

Available-for-sale assets mainly consist of non-consolidated investments and marketable securities that do not qualify for inclusion in other financial asset categories. They are measured at fair value, with fair value movements recognized directly in equity, unless an impairment test leads to the recognition of an unrealized capital loss compared with the historical acquisition cost and this is equateddue to a material andor long-term loss.downturn in expected cash flows from the assets concerned. Where this is the case, the impairment loss is recognized in the Income statement. Reverse of impairments of debt securities onlyStatement. Impairment reversals are recognized in the Income statementStatement for debt securities only (receivables and interest rate bonds).

Amounts recognized in equity are released to income on the sale of the relevant investment.  Fair value is equal to market value in the case of listed securities and an estimate of the value in use in the case of unlisted securities, determined based on financial criteria most appropriate to the specific situation of each security. Non-consolidated investments which are not listed on an active market and for which the fair value cannot be measured reliably, are recorded as a last resort by the Group at historical cost less any accumulated impairment losses.


Net gains and losses on available-for-sale assets consist of interest income, dividends, impairment losses and capital gains and losses on disposal.

Loans and receivables

This category includes loans to non-consolidated investments, operating financial assets, other loans and receivables and trade receivables. After initial recognition at fair value, these instruments are recognized and measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.



F-14



Back to Contents


An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of these assets exceeds the recoverable amount, as estimated during impairment tests.tests, where there exists an indication of impairment. The impairment loss is recognized in the Income statement.Statement.


The impairment of trade receivables is calculated using two methods:

a statistical method : this method is based on past losses and involves the application of a provision rate by category of aged receivables. The analysis is performed for a group of similar receivables, presenting similar credit characteristics as a result of belonging to a client category and country.

an individual method: the probability and amount of the loss is assessed on an individual case basis (past due period, other balance sheet positions with the counterparty, rating issued by an external rating agency, geographical location).

Net gains and losses on loans and receivables consist of interest income and impairment losses.

Assets and liabilities at fair value through the Income statementprofit and loss

This category includes includes:

trading assets and liabilities acquired by the CompanyGroup for the purpose of selling them in the near term in order to realize a capital gain, which form part of a portfolio of identified financial instruments that are managed together and for which there is evidence of a recent actual pattern of short-term profit-taking. AssetsDerivative instruments not qualifying for hedge accounting are also considered trading assets and liabilities.

assets designated at fair value through the Income statement also includeand primarily the portfolio of cash UCITS whose performance and management areis based on fair values. value.

Changes in the value of these assets are recognized in the Income statement.Statement.

Net gains and losses on assets at fair value through profit and loss consist of interest income, dividends, fair value adjustments and capital gains and losses on disposal.

Net gains and losses on derivatives entered into for trading purposes consist of flows exchanged and the change in the value of the instrument.

1.14.3

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash equivalents are held to meet short-term cash commitments rather than for investment or other purposes.commitments. Cash and cash equivalents include all cash balances, deposits with a maturity of less than 3 months cash andwhen initially recorded in the Balance Sheet, monetary UCITS and negotiable debt instruments. These investments can be converted into cash or sold in the very short term and do not present any material risk of loss in value. Cash and cash equivalents are valued in accordance with the rules applicable to thedesignated as assets at fair value category through the Income statement.profit and loss.

Bank overdrafts repayable on demand which form an integral part of the Group’sGroup's cash management policy represent a component of cash and cash equivalents for the purposes of the Cashcash flow statement.


1.14.4

Recognition and measurement of financial liabilities

With the exception of trading liabilities and liability derivative instruments which are measured at fair value, borrowings and other financial liabilities are recognized initially at fair value less transaction costs and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.

The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments through to maturity or receipts over the next market-price fixing date,estimated term of the financial instrument or, where applicable, over a shorter period, to the net carrying amount of the financial asset or liability.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-8



Back to contents


When the financial liability issued includes an embedded derivative which must be recognized separately, the amortized cost is calculated on the debt component only.  The amortized cost at the acquisition date is equal to the proceeds from the issue less the fair value of the embedded derivative.



F-15



Back to Contents


1.14.5

Minority interest put options

Pursuant to IAS 27, minority interests in fully consolidated subsidiaries are considered a component of equity.

Furthermore, in accordance with IAS 32, minority interest put options are considered a liability and measured in accordance with IAS 39.as liabilities.

Pending an International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC)IFRIC interpretation or a specific IFRS, the Group has provisionally adopted the following treatment which may be modified at a later date:treatment:

·

the fairpresent value of purchase undertakingscommitments is recorded in borrowings in the balance sheet,Balance Sheet, through minority interests and where necessary goodwill for the residual balance.

·

gains or losses resulting from the unwinding of the discount ofon the liability are recorded in other financial income and expenses,finance costs and, when the put exercise price is variable,varies, changes in the value of the instrument resulting from changes in valuation assumptions concerning the promisecommitment are recorded in borrowings through goodwill.


If the minority interests arehave not been purchased on the expiry of the promise,commitment, minority interests in equity are reconstituted through goodwill and the journals previously recorded are reversed.liability recognized in respect of the commitment (no longer necessary).

1.14.6


Recognition and measurement of derivative instruments

The Group uses various derivative instruments to manage its exposure to interest rate and foreign exchange risks resulting from its operating, financial and investment activities. Certain transactions performed in accordance with the groupGroup interest rate and foreign exchange risk management policy do not satisfy hedge accounting criteria and are recorded as trading instruments.

Derivative instruments are recognized in the balance sheet at fair value. Other than the exceptions detailed below, changes in the fair value of derivative instruments are recorded through the Income statement.profit and loss. The fair value of derivatives is estimated using standard valuation models which take into account active market data.

Net gains and losses on instruments at fair value through profit and loss (trading instruments) consist of flows exchanged and the change in the value of the instrument.

Derivative instruments may be classifieddesignated as hedges under one of three types of hedging relationship: fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or net investment hedge in a foreign operation:

a fair value hedge is a hedge of exposure to changes in fair value of a recognized asset or liability, or an identified portion of such an asset or liability, that is attributable to a particular risk (notably interest rate or foreign exchange risk), and could affect net income for the period.

a cash flow hedge is a hedge of exposure to variability in cash flows that is attributable to a particular risk associated with a recognized asset or liability or a highly probable forecast transaction (such as a planned purchase or sale) and could affect net income for the period.

the net investment hedge in a foreign operation hedges the exposure to foreign exchange risk of the net assets of a foreign operation including loans considered part of the investment (IAS 21).


An asset, liability, firm commitment, future cash-flow or net investment in a foreign operation qualifies for hedge accounting if:

the hedging relationship is precisely defined and documented at the inception date;

the effectiveness of the hedge is demonstrated at inception and by regular verification of the offsetting nature of movements in the market value of the hedging instrument and the hedged item. The ineffective portion of the hedge is systematically recognized in financial items.the Income Statement.



F-16



Back to Contents


The use of hedge accounting has the following consequences:

in the case of fair value hedges of existing assets and liabilities, the hedged portion of these items is measured at fair value in the balance sheet.Balance Sheet. The gain or loss on remeasurement is recognized in the Income statement,Statement, where it is offset against matching gains or losses arising on the fair value remeasurement of the hedging financial instrument, to the extent it is effective;

in the case of cash flow hedges, the portion of the gain or loss on the fair value remeasurement of the hedging instrument that is determined to be an effective hedge is recognized directly in equity, while the gain or loss on the fair value remeasurement of the underlying item is not recognized in the balance sheet. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognized in the Income statement.Statement. Gains or losses recognized in equity are released to the Income statementStatement in line with the recording ofsame period or periods in which the items hedged.asset acquired or liability issued impacts the Income Statement;

in the case of net investment hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognized in translation reserves in equity, while the ineffective portion is recognized in the Income statement.Statement. Gains and losses recognized in foreign exchange translation reserves are released to the Income statementStatement when the foreign operationinvestment is sold.


1.14.7

Embedded derivatives


An embedded derivative is a component of a host contract that satisfies the definition of a derivative and whose economic characteristics are not closely related to that of the host contract. An embedded derivative must be separated from its host contract and accounted for as a derivative if, and only if, the following three conditions are satisfied:


·

the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative are not closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract;

·

the embedded derivative satisfies the definition of a derivative laid down in IAS 39; and

·

the hybrid instrument is not measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in the Income statement.Statement.

1.14.8


Treasury shares

Treasury shares are deducted from equity.

Gains or losses arising on the sale of treasury shares and related dividends are recognized directly in equity and do not impact the Income statement.Statement.


1-15.1.15

Pension plans (IAS 19) and other employee-related obligationspost-employment benefits

The Group hasVeolia Environnement and its subsidiaries have several pension plans. Pension obligations are calculated using the projected unit credit method. This method is based on the probability of personnel remaining with companies in the Group until retirement, the foreseeable changes in future compensation, and the appropriate discount rate. Specific discount rates are adopted for each monetary zone. This results in the recognition of pension-related assets or liabilities, and the recognition of the related net expenses.

Veolia Environnement has electedPursuant to offsetIAS 19 revised, actuarial gains and losses against equity as of January 1, 2004 and for early adoption as of January 1, 2005 of IAS 19 (revised). Actuarial gains and losses generated at this date are therefore, offset against equity and no amortization charge in respect of these actuarial gains and losses is recordedare not amortized in the Income statement.Statement.


1-16.1.16

Share-based payments (IFRS 2)

Pursuant to IFRS 2-2,Share-based Payment, an expense is recorded in respect of share purchase or subscription plans and other share-based compensation granted by the Group to its employees. The fair value of these plans on the grant date is expensed in the Income statementStatement and recognized directly in equity in the period in which the benefit is vested and the service is rendered. In accordance with IFRS 2, in order



F-17



Back to ensure the comparability of the 2005 and 2004 financial statements, only those plans granted after November 7, 2002 and for which rights have not been vested at January 1, 2005 are measured and recognized in personnel costs.Contents


The fair value of purchase and subscription options is calculated using the binomialBlack and Scholes model, taking into account the expected life of the options, the risk-free interest rate, observed volatility in the past and dividends expected on the shares.

The compensation expense in respect of employee savings plans is equal to the difference between the subscription price and the average share price at each subscription date.date, less a discount for non-transferability.

1.17



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-9



Back to contents



1-17.Revenue

Revenue (IAS 18)

Revenue is equal torepresents sales of goods and services measured at the fair value of the counterparty received or receivable.

Revenue from the sale of goods andor services for whichis recognized when the following conditions are satisfied:

the amount of revenue can be measured reliably;

the significant risks and rewards of ownership andof the control thereofgoods have been effectively transferred to the buyer.buyer;

Due

the recovery of the counterparty is considered probable;

the costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the transaction can be measured reliably.

1.17.1

Sales of goods

Sales of goods mainly concern the sale of technological procedures and solutions relating to the specific naturetreatment of Veolia Environnement's business,water (drinking water and wastewater treatment) in the Water Division and sales of products related to recycling activities in the Environmental Services Division.

Revenue relating to these sales is recognized on physical delivery of the goods, which represents the transfer of the inherent risks of ownership of these goods.

1.17.2

Sales of services

The provision of services represents the majority of Group businesses such as the processing of waste, water distribution and related services, network operation and passenger transport and energy services (heat distribution, thermal services and public lighting).

Revenue from these activities is recognized when the service is rendered and it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to Group entities.

These activities involve the performance of a service agreed contractually (nature, price) with a public sector or industrial customer, within a set period. Billing is therefore based on the waste tonnage processed/ incinerated, the volume of water distributed, the thermal power delivered or the number of passengers transported, multiplied by the contractually agreed price.

Note that fees and taxes collected on behalf of local authorities are excluded from revenueRevenue when there is no risk of payment default by third parties. Income fromparties for the Group.

1.17.3

Construction contracts comprising a lease pursuant(excluding service concession arrangements)

Construction contracts primarily concern the design and construction of the infrastructures necessary for water treatment/distribution and wastewater treatment activities.

The related revenue is recognized in accordance with IAS 11 (see Note 1.22).



F-18



Back to IFRIC 4 includes:

principal finance repayments by the local authority;

loan remuneration (see note 1-20).

Principal finance repayments are excluded from revenue. However, financial income related to the loans is included therein.Contents


1-18.1.17.4

IFRIC 4 Contracts

Contracts falling within the scope of IFRIC 4 (see Note 1.21) involve services generally rendered to industrial/private customers. All service components to which the parties have agreed are detailed in contracts such as BOT (Build Operate Transfer) contracts.

Services include the financing of the construction of a specific asset/installation on behalf of the customer and the operation of the asset concerned.

Revenue relating to the construction of the asset is recognized in accordance with the provisions of IAS 11 and the asset is recorded in operating financial assets. Revenue is recognized on a completion basis at each period end, based on actual and expected costs.

The financing of construction work involves finance costs that are invoiced to the customer and recognized in Revenue, under Revenues from operating financial assets. This interest is recognized in Revenue from the start of construction work and represents remuneration received by the builder/lender.

Revenue relating to the operation of the asset is recognized on delivery of the goods or performance of the service depending on the operating activity.

1.17.5

Service Concession arrangements (IFRIC 12)

See Note 1.20 on Service concession arrangements.

1.18

Financial items in the Income statementStatement


In the Group’s opinion, the non-accounting balance, “net financial debt”, is a relevant indicator of the Group’s debt. Net financial debt is defined by the Group as the total of long- and short-term borrowings (excepted fair value of derivative instruments) less net cash and cash equivalents.

Net financeFinance costs consist of interest payable on borrowings calculated using the effective interest rate, gainsamortized cost method and losses on interest rate derivatives, both qualifying and not qualifying as hedges and income from cash investments and equivalents. Interest income is recognized in the Income statement when it is earned using the effective interest method. hedges.

Interest costs included in payments under lease finance contracts are recorded using the effective interest method.

Finance income consists of gains on interest rate derivatives, whether qualifying or not qualifying as hedges and income from cash investments and equivalents.

Interest income is recognized in the income statement when earned, using the amortized cost method.

Other financial income and expenses notably include loan income on financial receivables calculated using the amortized cost method, dividends, foreign exchange gains and losses, impairment losses on financial assets and the unwinding of discount ofdiscounts on provisions.


1-19.1.19

Income taxes (IAS 12)

The income tax expense (income)(credit) includes the current tax charge (income)(credit) and the deferred tax charge (income)(credit).

Deferred tax assets are recognized on deductible temporary differences, tax loss carry forwards and/or tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax liabilities are recognized on taxable temporary differences.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in prevailing tax laws and rates at the enactment date.year end. Deferred tax balances are not discounted.

A deferred tax asset is recognized to the extent that the Group is likely to generate sufficient future taxable profits against which the asset can be offset. Deferred tax assets are impaired to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available.



F-19



Back to Contents


1-20.1.20

Accounting policies specificDescription of Group concession activities

In the course of its business, Veolia Environnement provides collective services (distribution of drinking water and heating, passenger transport network, household waste collection, etc.) to environmentallocal authorities in return for a remuneration based on services activitiesrendered.

These collective services (also known as services of general interest or general economic interest or public services) are generally managed by Veolia Environnement under contracts entered into at the request of public bodies which retain control thereof.

Concession arrangements involve the transfer of operating rights for a limited period, under the control of the local authority, using dedicated installations built by Veolia Environnement, or made available to it for a fee or nil consideration:

These contracts define "public service obligations" in return for remuneration. The remuneration is based on operating conditions, continuity of service, price rules and obligations with respect to the maintenance/replacement of installations. The contract determines the conditions for the transfer of installations to the local authority or a successor at its term.

Veolia Environnement provides environmental management services to local authorities and industrial customers. Through numerous contracts, Veolia Environnement operates assets that it returns when the contracts terminate. Incan, in certain cases, Veolia Environnement financesbe responsible for a given service as it holds the assets on behalfservice support network (water/heat distribution network, water treatment network). Such situations are the result of full or partial privatizations. Provisions impose public or private partners. As partservice obligations and the means by which the local authority may recover control of the concession holder.

These contracts generally include price review accompanying IFRS adoption, Veolia Environnement examined the nature of assets held by considering the “substance” of these contracts, grouping them into three categories.

Assets relating to contracts covered by IFRIC 4

Certain contracts qualify for treatment as lease contracts pursuant to IAS 17 and its interpretation IFRIC 4 published in December 2004. IFRIC 4-Determining whether an arrangement contains a lease seeks to identify the contractual terms and conditions of agreements which, without taking the legal form of a lease, convey a right to use an asset in return for payments included in the overall contract remuneration. It identifies in such agreements,clauses. These clauses are mainly based on cost trends, inflation, changes in tax and/or other legislation and occasionally on changes in volumes and/or the allocationoccurrence of specific events changing the profitability of the riskscontract.

In addition, the Group generally assumes a contractual obligation to maintain and rewards of ownership, a lease contract which is thenrepair facilities managed under public service contracts. The resulting maintenance and repair costs are analyzed and accounted for in accordance with the criteria laid down in IAS 17. The contract operator therefore becomes the lessor vis-à-vis its customers. Where the lease transfers the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset in accordance with IAS 17 criteria,37 on provisions and, where necessary, a provision for contractual commitments is recorded where there is outstanding work to be performed.

The nature and extent of the operator recognizes a loan (“IFRIC 4 loan”) to reflect the corresponding financing.  

Contracts satisfying the criteria laid down in IFRIC 4 are either out-sourcingGroup’s rights and obligations under these different contracts with industrial customers, “Build Operate and Transfer” (BOT) contracts or incineration or co-generation contracts, under which, notably, risks associated with the level of demand or volume are in substance transferreddiffer according to the customer.public services rendered by the different Group divisions.

The accounting treatment is disclosed in Notes 1.20, 5 and 10.

Water:

Veolia Environnement doesmanages municipal drinking water and/or waste water services. These services encompass all or part of the water cycle (extraction from natural sources, treatment, storage and distribution followed by collection and treatment of waste water and release into the environment).

In France, these services are primarily rendered under public service delegation “affermage” contracts with a term of 8 to 20 years. They concern the distribution of drinking water and/or the collection and treatment of waste water. They use specific assets, such as distribution or wastewater treatment networks and drinking water or wastewater treatment plants, which are generally provided by the concession grantor and returned to it at the end of the contract.

Abroad, Veolia Environnement renders its services under contracts which reflect local legislation, the economic situation of the country and the investment needs of each partner.

These contracts are generally concession arrangements, service contracts or O&M (Operate & Manage) and BOT contracts with an average term of between 7 and 40 years, and sometimes longer.

Contracts can also be entered into with public entities in which Veolia Environnement purchased an interest on their partial privatization. The profitability of these contracts is not therefore recognizefundamentally different from other contracts, but operations are based on a partnership agreement with the local authority.



F-20



Back to Contents


Environmental Services:

Both in France and abroad, the main concession arrangements entered into by Veolia Environnement concern the treatment and recovery of waste in sorting units, storage and incineration. These contracts have an itemaverage term of property, plant18 to 30 years.

Energy Services:

Veolia Environnement has developed a range of energy management activities: heating and cooling networks, thermal and multi-technical services, industrial utilities, installation and maintenance of production equipment, but a loanintegration services for the comprehensive management of buildings and electrical services on public roadways.

The main contracts concern the management of heating and air-conditioning networks under urban concessions or on behalf of local authorities.

In Eastern Europe, Veolia Environnement’s Energy Services Division provides services under mixed partial privatizations or through public-private partnerships with local authorities responsible for the production and distribution of thermal energy.

Transportation:

Veolia Environnement’s Transportation Division provides passenger transport services on behalf of local, regional and national public authorities.

Veolia Environnement primarily provides these services in France and abroad under service contracts comprising public service obligations (as per EU terminology), with terms of 7 to these customers. During the construction phase, a loan is15 years.

Accounting for service concession agreements

Concession agreements are recognized in the balance sheet and operating income in the Income statement,since fiscal year 2006 in accordance with IFRIC12, Service Concession Agreement, published in November 2006, as Veolia Environnement elected for the percentage completionearly adoption of this interpretation as the preferred method. This interpretation is of mandatory application for periods beginning on or after January 1, 2008. The change in accounting method laid downwas applied retrospectively in accordance with IAS 118 on changes in accounting method. As such, the Veolia Environnement consolidated financial statements for construction contracts. The loans resulting from this analysis are initially measuredthe year ended December 31, 2005 were adjusted for the retrospective application of IFRIC 12. IFRIC 12 is currently in the process of being approved at the fair value of lease payments and then amortized using the effective interest method. After a review of the contract and its financing, the implied interest rate on the loan is based on either the Group financing rate and /or the borrowing rate associated with the contract.

Concession and affermage contractsEuropean level.

A substantial portion of Group’sthe Group's assets areis used within the resultframework of concession or affermage contractscontract granted andby public sector customers ("grantors") and/or by concession companies purchased by the Group on full or partial privatization. The characteristics of these contracts vary significantly depending on the country and activity concerned.

Nonetheless, they generally provide, directly or indirectly, for customer involvement in the determination of the service and its remuneration, and the return of the assets necessary to the performance of the service at the end of the contract. In 2005, the Group recorded these assets on

IFRIC 12 is applicable to concession arrangements comprising a separate linepublic service obligation and satisfying all of the balance sheet, “Publicly-owned utility networks”. These assets are amortizedfollowing criteria:

the concession grantor controls or depreciated over their useful life in accordance with IAS 38 on intangible assets and IAS 16 on property, plant and equipment.

In addition,regulates the Group generally assumes a contractual obligationservices to maintain and repair facilities managed through public service contracts. Inbe provided by the case of publicly-owned utility networks accounted for in accordance with IAS 38, resulting maintenance and repair costs are analyzed in accordance with IAS 37 on provisions and, where appropriate, a provision for maintenance and repair costs is recorded.

Other contracts

Property, plant and equipment under contracts which do not fall into eitheroperator using the asset, the infrastructure, the beneficiaries of the above two categories continue to be recorded as property, plantservices and equipment. The components approach is applied in accordance with IAS 16.prices applied;

Outlook for 2006

In March 2005, IFRIC published draft interpretations D12, D13 and D14 on service concession arrangements where the grantor determinescontrols the terms and conditions under whichsignificant residual interest in the assets are operated and sets directly or indirectly the price of services rendered, and which provide for the return of assets with a material residual value to the grantorinfrastructure at the end of the contract term.term of the arrangement.

These drafts do not permit the recording ofPursuant to IFRIC 12, such infrastructures are not recognized in assets of the operator as property, plant and equipment but in financial assets ("financial asset model") and/or intangible assets ("intangible asset model") depending on the remuneration commitments given by the concession operator. Ifgrantor.

1.20.1

“Financial asset model”

The financial asset model applies when the operator finances the infrastructure, it must recognize either ahas an unconditional right to receive cash or another financial asset (D13) when payments are made byfrom the grantor, or an intangible asset (D14) when payments are collected from users.

Despite several delays in the publication date of these interpretations and the fact that their adoption remains uncertain, the Group has nonetheless decided to proceed with their implementation in 2006. In the Group’s opinion, these draft interpretations could represent a significant progress in the application of the standards and offer an adequate basis for amending the accounting presentation of the assets concerned. The Group will therefore undertake a detailed review of its extensive contract portfolio in 2006 with a view to initial application, subject to further amendments to the drafts.grantor.





VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-10F-21



Back to contentsContents


1-21.In the case of concession services, the operator has such an unconditional right if the grantor contractually guarantees the payment of:

Construction contacts (IAS 11)


amounts specified or determined in the contract or

the shortfall, if any, between amounts received from users of the public service and amounts specified or determined in the contract.

Financial assets resulting from the application of IFRIC 12 are recorded in the Balance Sheet under the heading "Operating financial assets" and recognized at amortized cost.

Unless otherwise indicated in the contract, the effective interest rate is equal to the weighted average cost of capital of the entities carrying the assets concerned.

Pursuant to IAS 11,39, an impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of these assets exceeds the recoverable amount, as estimated during impairment tests. Fair value is estimated based on the recoverable amount, calculated by discounting future cash flows (value in use method).

The portion falling due within less than one year is presented in "Current operating financial assets", while the portion falling due within more than one year is presented in the non-current heading.

Revenue associated with this financial model includes:

revenue determined on a completion basis in the case of construction operating financial assets (in accordance with IAS 11);

the remuneration of the operating financial asset recorded in Revenue from operating financial assets (excluding principal payments);

service remuneration.

1.20.2

“Intangible asset model”

The intangible asset model applies where the operator is paid by the users or where the concession grantor has not provided a contractual guarantee in respect of the recoverable amount. The intangible asset corresponds to the right granted by the concession grantor to the operator to charge users of the public service.

Intangible assets resulting from the application of IFRIC 12 are recorded in the Balance Sheet under the heading "Concession intangible assets" and whenare amortized, generally on a straight-line basis, over the net income fromcontract term. However, fees paid to local authorities that are an integral part of the cost of the intangible asset are disclosed under the heading "Other intangible assets".

Under the intangible asset model, Revenue includes:

revenue recorded on a completion basis, in the case of construction operating financial assets (in accordance with IAS 11).

service remuneration.

1.20.3

“Mixed or bifurcation model”

The choice of the financial asset or intangible asset model depends on the existence of payment guarantees granted by the concession grantor.  

However, certain contracts may include a payment commitment on the part of the concession grantor covering only part of the investment, with the balance covered by royalties charged to users.

Where this is the case, the investment amount guaranteed by the concession grantor is recognized under the financial asset model and the residual balance is recognized under the intangible asset model.



F-22



Back to Contents


1.21

Finance leases

IFRIC 4 seeks to identify the contractual terms and conditions of agreements which, without taking the legal form of a lease, convey a right to use a group of assets in return for payments included in the overall contract can be measured reliably, Group companies recognizeremuneration. It identifies in such agreements a marginlease contract which is then analyzed and accounted for in accordance with the criteria laid down in IAS 17, based on the allocation of the risks and rewards of ownership.

The contract operator therefore becomes the lessor vis-à-vis its customers. Where the lease transfers the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset in accordance with IAS 17 criteria, the operator recognizes a financial asset to reflect the corresponding financing, rather than an item of property, plant and equipment.

These financial assets are recorded in the Balance Sheet under the heading "Operating financial assets". They are initially recorded at the lower of fair value and total future flows and subsequently at amortized cost using the effective interest rate of the contract.

The portion falling due within less than one year is presented in "Current operating financial assets", while the portion falling due within more than one year is presented in the non-current heading.

Contracts falling within the scope of IFRIC 4 are either outsourcing contracts with industrial customers, BOT (Build Operate Transfer) contracts, or incineration or cogeneration contracts under which, notably, demand or volume risk is, in substance, transferred to the prime contractor.

During the construction phase, a financial receivable is recognized in the balance sheet and revenue in the Income Statement, in accordance with the percentage completion method laid down in IAS 11 for construction contracts.

The financial receivables resulting from this analysis are initially measured at the fair value of lease payments and then amortized using the effective interest method.

After a review of the contract and its financing, the implied interest rate on the financial receivable is based on either the Group financing rate and /or the borrowing rate associated with the contract.

1.22

Construction contracts

Veolia Environnement recognizes income and expenses associated with construction contracts in accordance with the percentage of completion method defined in IAS 11.

These contracts are entered into with local authorities or private partners for the construction of infrastructures. They are generally fixed-price contracts as defined by IAS 11.

Revenue generated by construction services rendered by the Group is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable, where total income and expenses associated with the construction contract and the stage of completion can be determined reliably.

The percentage of completion is determined by comparing costs incurred as of the balance sheet date with total estimated costs under the contract. Costs incurred are recognized as production cost and do not include either administrative or selling costs.

WhenWhere total contract costs exceed total contract income,revenue, the expected loss is expensedrecognized as an expense immediately through the recognition ofvia a provision for losses to completion.completion, irrespective of the stage of completion and based on a best estimate of forecast results including, where appropriate, rights to additional income or compensation, where they are probable and can be determined reliably. Provisions for losses to completion are recorded as liabilities in the Balance Sheet.

Partial payments received under construction contracts before the corresponding work has been performed, are recognized in liabilities in the Balance Sheet under advances and down-payments received.



F-23



Back to Contents


The amount of costs incurred, plus profits and less losses recognized (notably in provisions for losses to completion) and intermediary billings is determined on an individual contract basis. Where positive, this amount is recognized in assets in "amounts due from customers for construction contract work". Where negative, it is recognized in liabilities in "amounts due to customers for construction contract work".

1-22.1.23

Electricity purchase and sale contracts

Incidentally to their operations, certain Veolia Environnement subsidiaries are required to purchase or sell electricity on the market. market, in order to manage supplies and optimize costs.

Revenue

After analyzing theanalysis of contractual terms and conditions, sales which do not qualify as being for “own use” are designated as trading. Revenueincome from trading activitiesactivity transactions is equal torecognized in "Revenue", for the margin generated by the purchase and sale of electricity.related margin.

Financial instruments

Certain subsidiaries enter into forwardelectricity transactions (forward contracts, for the purchase or sale of electricity. When these contracts do not qualifyoptions) which are recognized as being for “own use”, these transactions are accounted for as trading contractsderivative financial instruments in accordance with IAS 39.

Application scope of IAS 39

Options and forward purchase and sale contracts with physical delivery are excluded from the application scope of IAS 39 if entered into for own use (exception for own-use).

This exception is applicable when the following conditions are satisfied:

The volumes purchased or sold under the contracts reflect the operating requirements of the subsidiary;

The contracts are not subject to net settlement as defined by IAS 39 and, recognizedin particular, physical delivery is systematic;

The contracts are not equivalent to sales of options, as defined by IAS 39.

Recognition and measurement of instruments falling within the application scope of IAS 39

Instruments falling within the application scope of IAS 39 are derivative instruments and are measured at fair value.value, calculated using models generally based on observable data. Fair value movements are recorded in operating income. The net impact of the unwinding of these transactions is recorded in revenue. The fair value on signature of the contracts is recognized over the contact term where there is a lack of visibility as to market liquidity.revenue (see Note 30).

1.24


1-23.

CO2Greenhouse gas emission allowancesrights

Pursuant to the Kyoto Protocol, the Group has undertaken to reduce the level of greenhouse gases emitted by energy production installations which it manages.

In this respect, the Group received a certain number of free emission allowancesrights for thean initial so-called pre-Kyoto period 2005-2007 and then for a second period 2008-2012 and must satisfy annual obligations to surrender allowancesrights equal to total actual emissions.

TheIn the absence of specific IFRS provisions, the Group has elected to account for these allowances usingadopted the net"net liability approach: emission allowances are considered equivalent to repayment rights on commitments received gratuitously;approach".

This approach involves the accounting method depends on the policy adopted:

1/ “Own-use” policy:

·

If emission allowances prove inadequate at the period end, annual surrender obligations cannot be satisfied:recognition of a liability, in accordance with IAS 37 aprinciples, corresponding to amounts that will have to be disbursed to meet surrender obligations at the end of the three-year period, should emission rights be insufficient to cover actual emissions during the period.

The liability is recognized equal toassessed based on emissions during the fair valueperiod, rights held and the market price at the period end (or the forward price in the case of the commitment.forward purchases). This liability is subsequently releasedreversed when surrender obligations are satisfied and purchases of emission allowancesrights are recorded in full in operating expenses.

·

If emission allowancesAllowances received are inadequate at the timetreated on grant as entitlement to repayment of annual surrender, over and above any provision recognized at the preceding balance sheet date, additional allowances purchaseda commitment received for nil consideration. They are recorded directly in operating expenses and a liability is not recognized.

·

Theas intangible assets with nil value (IAS 38). In the event of surplus rights, income from the sale of excess allowancessuch rights is recorded as a deduction from operating expenses.reduction in cost of sales.

2/ “Trading” policy:

F-24



Back to Contents


Emission rights purchased on the market for surrender to Member States where rights held are insufficient to cover actual emissions, are recorded in the balance sheet at acquisition cost. An impairment loss is recognized at the period end if the market value is less than the acquisition cost.

Furthermore, allowances purchased for trading purposesresale on the market are recognizedrecorded in other intangible assetsinventories and remeasured based on the market price at acquisition cost (inthe period end, in accordance with the options available under IAS 38). As capital gain or loss is recognized on sale.2 for trading inventories.

Veolia Environnement adopted an “own-use” policy in 2005.


1-24.1.25

Segment reporting  (IAS 14)

Pursuant to IAS 14, Veolia Environnement has elected to reportprovides primary financial information by business segment and secondary financial information by geographical area. The business segments are Water, Waste Management,Environmental Services, Energy Services and Transportation.


1-25.1.26

Standards and interpretation applicable in 2006interpretations not adopted early

Veolia Environnement has not elected for early adoption of the following standards and 2007 (other than those detailed in  note 1.20)interpretations:


- IFRIC 7-Applying the restatement approach under IAS 29 financial reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies1, revised,Presentation of Financial Statements: European Union approval is expected in April/May 2006. This draft interpretation is, applicable to the Group from January 1, 2007. 2009.

IFRS 8,Operating Segments, applicable to the Group from January 1, 2009.

IFRIC 11,IFRS2 - Group and treasury share transactions, applicable to the Group from January 1, 2008.

IFRIC 13,Customer Loyalty Programmes, applicable to the Group from January 1, 2009 but not relevant to the Group.

IFRIC 14,IAS 19—The Limit on a Defined Benefit Asset, Minimum Funding Requirements and their Interaction, applicable to the Group from January 1, 2008.

Veolia Environnement does not expect implementation of these standards and interpretations to have a material impact.

IAS 23 revised,Borrowing costs, applicable to the Group from January 1, 2009.

Veolia Environnement does not expect implementation of this interpretationstandard to have a material impact.impact, in so far as the Group has elected to capitalize borrowing costs.


- IFRIC 8-Scope of IFRS 23 revised,Business combinations: European Union approval is expected in, applicable to the summer of 2006. Application of this interpretation is mandatory for financial periods beginning on or after May 1, 2006. Application by Veolia Environnement is mandatoryGroup from January 1, 2007. Veolia Environnement does not expect implementation of this interpretation2010.

IAS 27 revised,Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements, applicable to have a material impact.


- IAS 21 revised (December 15, 2005): European Union approval is expected in April/May 2006 and application is mandatorythe Group from January 1, 2006. The revised text states that in2010.

IFRS 2 amendment,Share-Based Payment – Vesting Conditions and Cancellations, applicable to the case of net investments in foreign operations, foreign exchange gains and losses on loans denominated in a currency different from the functional currency of the lending company or of the borrowing company, must be recognized in foreign exchange translation reserves.


-Amendment to IAS 39 on the fair value option. This amendment is applicableGroup from January 1, 2006. Companies may designate a financial asset or liability as being2009.

Amendment to IAS 32 – IAS 1,Financial Instruments – Presentation: Financial instruments puttable at fair value throughand obligations arising on liquidation, applicable to the Income statement on initial recognition. In so far is it produces more relevant information, this designation is possible where it eliminates or significantly reduces an inconsistency in recognition or measurement which, otherwise, would result from the measurement of assets or liabilities or the recognition of resulting gains or losses on another basis. This designation may also be adopted when a group of financial assets or financial liabilities or both are managed and their performance is measured on a fair value basis in accordance with a documented risk management or investment policy and that information on a group is presented on this basis, internally, to group management. The Group does not expect any material impact.


- Amendment to IAS 39 on cash flow hedges of future inter-company transactions. The foreign exchange risk of a highly probable inter-company forecast transaction may qualify as a hedged item in a cash flow hedge in consolidated financial statements, provided that the transaction is denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the entity entering into the transaction and the foreign exchange risk will affect consolidated net income. This option offered to companies would not, in theory, appear to concern Veolia Environnement.


- IFRS 7 on financial instrument disclosures is applicable from January 1, 20072009.

These standards were published at the beginning of January 2008 and early adoptionthe Group is possible fromcurrently studying their potential impact.

1.27

Fair value determination principles

The fair value of all financial year 2006.assets and liabilities is determined at the balance sheet date, either for recognition in the accounts or disclosure in the notes to the financial statements (see Note 31).


The fair value is determined:



based on quoted prices in an active market, or

using internal valuation techniques involving standard mathematical calculation methods integrating observable market data (forward rates, interest rate curves, etc.), or

using internal valuation techniques integrating parameters estimated by the Group in the absence of observable market data.

VEOLIA

- Form 20-F | F-11

F-25



Back to contentsContents


Quoted prices in an active market

When quoted prices in an active market are available they are adopted in priority for the determination of the market value. Marketable securities and certain quoted bond issues are valued in this way.

Fair values determined using models integrating observable market data

The majority of derivative financial instruments (swaps, caps, floors, etc.) are traded over the counter and, as such, there are no quoted prices. Valuations are therefore determined using models commonly used by market participants to value such financial instruments.

Valuations calculated internally in respect of derivative instruments are tested every six months for consistency with valuations issued by our counterparties.

The fair value of unquoted borrowings is calculated by discounting contractual flows at the market rate of interest.

 The net carrying amount of receivables and payables falling due within less than one year and certain floating-rate receivables and payables is considered a reasonable estimate of their fair value, due to the short payment and settlement periods applied by the Veolia Group.

The fair value of fixed-rate loans and receivables depends on movements in interest rates and the credit risk of the counterparty.

Valuations produced by these models are adjusted to take account of changes in Veolia Group credit risk.

Fair values determined using models integrating certain non-observable data

Derivative instruments valued using internal models integrating certain non-observable data include certain electricity derivative instruments for which there are no quoted prices in an active market (notably for electricity purchase options with extremely long maturity) or observable market data (forward prices for component materials, interest-rate curves, etc.), in particular for distant maturities.



F-26



Back to Contents



Note 2NOTE 2.


Use of management estimates in the application of Group accounting standards

The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenuesrevenue and expenses, and the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Future results could differ significantlymay be different from these estimates.

Underlying estimates and assumptions are determined based on past experience and other factors considered as reasonable given the circumstances. They act as a basis for making judgments necessary to the determination of the carrying amount of assets and liabilities, which cannot be obtained directly from other sources. FuturelFuture values could differ from these estimates.

Underlying estimates and assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. The impact of changes in accounting estimates is recognized in the period the change is made if it affects this period only and in the period the change is made and subsequentprior periods if they are also affected by the change.

Notes 1.9 and 4 on goodwill and business combinations present the method adopted for the allocation of the acquisitionpurchase price on business combinations. This allocation is based on future cash flow assumptions and discount rates.

Notes 1.10, 4 and 56 concern goodwill and intangiblenon-current asset impairment tests. Group management performed tests based on best forecasts of the future valuecash flows of the activities of the cash generatingcash-generating units concerned and taking into account discount rates.

Note 341.27 describes the principles adopted for the determination of financial instrument fair values.

Note 30 on derivative instruments describes the accounting treatment of suchderivative instruments. Veolia Environnement valued these derivative instruments, allocated them and tested their effectiveness where necessary.

Notes 1917 and 3532 on provisions and employee commitments detail the provisions recognized by Veolia Environnement. Veolia Environnement determined these provisions based on best estimates of these obligations.

Note 2825 on the income tax expense presents the tax position of the Group and is notably based in France and in the United States on best estimates available to the Group of trends in future tax results.

All these estimates are based on organized procedures for the collection of forecast information on future flows, validated by lineoperating management, and on expected market data based on external indicators and used in accordance with consistent and documented methodologies.



F-27



Back to Contents



Note 3NOTE 3.


Significant events


Acquisition

On April 27, 2007, Veolia Environnement announced the signature of BVAG:an agreement with The Blackstone Group and Apax Partners for the acquisition of Sulo. This acquisition for an enterprise value of €1,450 million (including borrowings) was finalized on July 2, 2007.

On May 31, 2007, the Environmental Services Division announced the signature of an agreement to acquire control of the Italian company VSA Tecnitalia (formerly TMT), a subsidiary of Termomeccanica Ecologica specializing in waste management and treatment. The scope of consolidation was extended as of January 1, 2005 to include mainly the water services company serving the town of Braunschweig in Lower Saxony, Germany (this company also provides other services such as heating and distribution of gas and electricity). The Group purchased 74.9%transaction concerned 75% of the share capital based on an enterprise value (100%) of €338 million. The stake may be raised to 100% by 2012. The acquisition was finalized on October 3, 2007.

On June 12, 2007, the Energy Services Division signed an agreement to acquire the private company Thermal North America, Inc., the largest portfolio of heating and cooling networks in the United States, for an enterprise value of U.S.$788 million. Through this company fortransaction, Veolia Environnement became a consideration of €374 million. Revenue of this companyleading player in the number one energy services market worldwide, at a time when rising energy prices and changes in environmental regulations in the United States are likely to generate new opportunities. The acquisition was finalized on December 12, 2007.

On June 27, 2007, the subscription period for the year ended December 31, 2005 totaled €350 million.


Expiryshare capital increase with retention of preferential subscription rights in the EDF call option on Dalkia:

Under the termsamount of the agreement signed in December 2000, EDF held a call option enabling it to increase its investment in Dalkia to 50%, provided that a number of conditions were met.

The conditions of this option were clarified in an amendment to the agreement signed€2.6 billion, announced by EDF and Veolia Environnement on AprilJune 12 2007, closed on July 10, 2007 with success. The gross amount of the share capital increase was €2,581,469,688 (including additional paid-in capital), following the issue of 51,941,040 new shares with a par value of €5 each.

On August 9, 2007, the Water Division signed an agreement to acquire the non-regulated activities of Thames Water in the United Kingdom for an enterprise value of €233 million. The acquisition was finalized on November 28, 2007.

On August 31, 2007, the Transportation Division sold its activities in Denmark.

On November 9, 2007, the Transportation Division sold its activities in Spain, with the exception of certain contracts.

On November 19, 2005. This amendment stated2007, Veolia Environnement opened up the share capital of its subsidiary Veolia Voda, in particular that EDF had until July 31, 2005charge of water activities in Central and Eastern Europe, to exercisethe EBRD, further extending its partnership with this option and that the option would only be considered definitively exercised at the date of conclusioninstitution. Following this transaction performed by the partiesway of a formal agreement covering notably the reorganizationshare capital increase, Veolia Environnement held 90% of their relationship under the industrialVeolia Voda.

On December 24, 2007, Société Financière Internationale (SFI) and commercial agreement and their rights and obligations under the shareholders’ agreement, including governance rules. This formal agreement had to be concluded by September 30, 2005 at the latest.

In this context, EDF exercised its call option on July 28, 2005 asSociété de Promotion et de Participation pour la Coopération Economique (PROPARCO) acquired a conservative measure. However,19.45% stake in Veolia Water AMI, which manages water activities in the absence of a formal agreement covering amendments to the industrial and commercial agreementAfrica, Middle East zone and the shareholders’ agreement, the option became null and void as of October 1, 2005. Supposing that no other EDF competitor takes control of the company, EDF no longer holds any call options in respect of Dalkia and its subsidiaries.

The original partnership agreement remains unchanged, and EDF andIndian sub-continent. Following this transaction, Veolia Environnement have confirmed their intentionheld 80.55% of Veolia Water AMI.




F-28



Back to exploit together any new opportunities in the European energy context.Contents



Note 4NOTE 4.


Goodwill

Goodwill


Goodwill breaks down as follows:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

Gross

4,944.9

4,455.4

Impairment losses

(81.8)

(71.8)

Net

4,863.1

4,383.6


Goodwill of €15.2 million was transferred to Assets of discontinued operations in 2004. No amounts were transferred in this respect in 2005.

(€ million)

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Gross

7,013.3

5,799.6

4,834.1

Impairment losses

(100.1)

(94.6)

(81.8)

Net

6,913.2

5,705.0

4,752.3


As of December 31, 2004,2007, accumulated impairment losses mainly concerned the goodwill of theconcern Transportation Division activities in Scandinavia (€70.0million)70 million recognized in 2004).

The main goodwill balances by cash-generating unit (amounts in excess of €100 million) are as follows:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Environmental Services United Kingdom

824.2

894.0

109.9

Water France Distribution

760.5

729.1

725.1

Environmental Services Germany

748.2

-

-

Environmental Services North America Solid Waste

567.8

610.3

672.0

Dalkia France

342.8

330.2

330.1

Water Central and Eastern Europe

266.9

255.9

169.9

Water United Kingdom

245.3

228.2

215.0

Water Solutions and Technologies

206.1

189.2

148.4

Environmental Services France Solid Waste

179.8

173.1

169.5

Transportation North America

145.5

154.8

90.1

Water China

145.5

145.7

186.5

Dalkia Italy

139.9

130.7

96.3

Veolia Energy Services United States

139.6

-

-

Water Germany (excluding Berlin)

138.8

138.1

137.3

Water Berlin

134.4

134.4

134.4

Water France joint venture subsidiaries

133.6

133.6

133.6

Transportation Sweden, Norway, Finland

124.5

106.0

96.8

Transportation France

117.7

115.4

108.7

Environmental Services Italy

114.6

-

-

Goodwill balances   > €100 million in 2007

5,475.7

4,468.7

3,523.6

Goodwill balances < €100 million in 2007

1,437.5

1,236.3

1,228.7

Goodwill

6,913.2

5,705.0

4,752.3




F-29



Back to Contents


Movements in the net carrying amount of goodwill by division during 2005:2007 are as follows :


(€ million)

As of December 31,2004

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Impairment losses and amounts removed

Other

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2006

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Impairment losses and negative goodwill

Other

As of December 31, 2007

Water

1,914.9

149.6

18.8

5.5

(36.4)

2,052.4

2,028.6

197.3

(30.4)

2.0

10.7

2,208.2

Waste Management

1,403.6

17.5

117.1

(10.0)

(0.5)

1,527.7

Environmental Services

2,294.0

903.7

(147.2)

-

(1.0)

3,049.5

Energy Services

762.9

69.5

0.9

(23.8)

26.8

836.3

839.2

246.7

2.5

10.4

(0.7)

1,098.1

Transportation

302.2

124.8

2.5

0.3

16.9

446.7

543.2

43.8

(18.4)

(13.9)

2.0

556.7

Other

-

-

-

0.7

0.7

Goodwill

4,383.6

361.4

139.3

(28.0)

6.8

4,863.1

5,705.0

1,391.5

(193.5)

(1.5)

11.7

6,913.2


Changes in consolidation scope in 2005 mainly primarily concerned the acquisitionfollowing acquisitions:

Environmental Services: Sulo Group (Germany) for €687.6 million and VSA Tecnitalia, formerly TMT (Italy) for €106.9 million;

Energy Services: Thermal North America Inc. (United States) for €139.3 million, Pannon Power (Hungary) for €30.1 million and CIT-Part (Brazil) for €21.3 million;

Water: Anox Kaldnes and its subsidiaries (Sweden) for €54.9 million, Thames Water subsidiaries (United Kingdom) for €50.2 million and Ruas (France) for €31.0 million;

Transportation: People Travel Group (Sweden) for €37.7 million and acquisitions of the water services company serving the town of Braunschweig in Germany (+€76 million)transportation-on-demand companies and Weir Techna in the United Kingdom (+€39 million) in the Water Division, of the company carrying the Lodz contract in Poland (+€56 million) in the Energy Services Division, and of ATC Vancomnew companies in the United States (+€59 million),for €21.1 million;

Foreign exchange translation losses are primarily due to the depreciation of Eurolines in France (minority interest buyout for €16 million) Helgelandske in Norway (+€14 million)the pound sterling and of Sodeli in France (+€10 million)the U.S. dollar in the Transportation Division.amount of €104.7 million and €92.6 million respectively.

Foreign exchange differences are mainly the resultImpairment losses total €26.7 million and include €6.9 million in respect of the appreciation of the US dollar against the euro (+€131 million).

Impairment losses total -€14.7 million and reversals of negative goodwill +€7.5 million.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-12



Back to contents


The sale of nuclear maintenance activities and the Facility Management business in Germany led to the removalimpairment of goodwill of €14.0the Eurolines  CGU and €19.7 million in respect of Danish transportation activities sold on August 31, 2007.Negative goodwill recognized in the Income Statement totaled €25.2 million and €6.8includes €10.9 million respectively withinfor the Transportation Division and €10.3 million for the Energy Services Division.

Other movements mainly consist of the offsetting entry to the recognition of put options held by minority interests in Poland in Energy Services Division for +€25 million.


Impairment tests as of December 31, 2005:2007:


Veolia Environnement performs systematic annual impairment tests in respect of goodwill and other intangible assets with an indefinite useful life. More frequent tests are performed where there is evidenceindication of impairment losses.a decrease in value.

The recoverable value of a cash generatingcash-generating unit (CGU) is estimated by discounting future cash flows.in accordance with the method set-out in Note 1.10. The main assumptions on which the value in use of a cash generatingcash-generating unit is based are the discount rate and trends in volumes, prices and direct costs (inflation) over the period.

Discount rates are estimated by management for each cash generatingcash-generating unit and reflect current market assessments of the time value of money and the specific risks to which the cash generatingcash-generating unit is exposed. Trends in volumes, prices and direct costs are based on past trends and the future market outlook.


Systematic impairment tests are based on future cash flows taken, for the first five years, from the strategiclong-term planning process in June 2005.2007. Cash flows for years 6 to 15 are based on year 6 cash flows (taken from the strategiclong-term planning document) adjusted by an appropriate growth rate (1% to 3% on average in 2005,2007, depending on the business). The terminal value is then calculated by discounting year 16 data at the perpetual growth rate,to perpetuity, including only an organic growth rate such as inflation (1%(0.5% to 2%3% on average in 2007, depending on the business).



F-30



Back to Contents


Discount rates used in 20052007 reflect both the business and the country or geographical area of the businesscash-generating unit based on the criteria disclosed in noteNote 1.10. The main average discount rates by geographical area in 20052007 were as follows, depending on the nature of the risk.follows:


Ø

France :

4.23% to 8.23%

Ø

United Kingdom:

5.76% to 10.80%

Ø

United States:

5.55% to 7.83%

Ø

Czech Republic:

4.62% to 6.35%

Ø

Germany:

4.23% to 7.39%

Ø

Australia:

7.60% to 7.92%

France:

6.2%

United Kingdom:

7.1%

United States:

7.0%

Asia:

6.2% to 8.0%

Germany:

6.2%

  

As of December 31, 2005,2006, an impairment losses of €14.7€7.3 million were recognizedwas recorded in respect of two CGUs.the Germany Transportation CGU, representing the entire goodwill balance.

As of December 31, 2007, an impairment of €6.9 million was recorded in respect of the Eurolines CGU.

Sensitivity of impairment tests:

Impairment tests are based on discount rate and perpetual growth rate assumptions and an analysis of the sensitivity of perpetual growth rates and discount rates to an increase or decrease of 1%.

A 1% increase in the discount rate would generate recoverable values for invested capital below the net carrying amount of certain cash-generating units. This reduction would be around €52 million.

A 1% decrease in perpetual growth rates would generate recoverable values for invested capital below the net carrying amount of certain cash-generating units. This reduction would be around €27 million.

Recap: Movements in the net carrying amount of goodwill during 2006 are as follows :

(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Impairment losses and negative goodwill

Impact of divestments

Other

As of December 31, 2006

Water

1,941.6

75.2

(12.5)

8.4

-

15.9

2,028.6

Environmental Services

1,527.7

840.9

(67.0)

-

(1.8)

(5.8)

2,294.0

Energy Services

836.3

36.9

0.6

0.8

-

(35.4)

839.2

Transportation

446.7

122.2

(10.4)

(6.8)

-

(8.5)

543.2

Goodwill

4,752.3

1,075.2

(89.3)

2.4

(1.8)

(33.8)

5,705.0

In 2006, changes in consolidation scope primarily concerned the following acquisitions:

Environmental Services: Cleanaway (United Kingdom) for €759.7 million and Biffa Belgium for €32.5 million;

Transportation: Supershuttle International (United States) for €69.9 million and Shuttleport (United States) for €17.5 million;

Water: Banska Bystrica STVPS (Slovakia) for €25.7 million and Poprad PVPS (Slovakia) for €10.2 million;

Energy Services: €28.3 million in Italy.

Foreign exchange translation losses were mainly the result of the fall in the US dollar against the euro (-€112 million).

Impairment losses total €10.1 million and include impairment of goodwill of the Germany Transportation CGU of €7.3 million and purchase price allocation corrections of €2.8 million in the Germany Water CGU. Negative goodwill recognized in the Income Statement totaled €12.5 million, including €11.2 million for the Water Division.

Other movements mainly concerned the definitive allocation of the ZEC Lodz purchase price (Energy Services in Poland) in the amount of -€34 million and of the Weir Techna purchase price (Water Engineering) in the amount of €14.1 million. Due to the limited impact, the 2005 financial statements were not restated.



F-31



Back to Contents



NOTE 5.

Concession intangible assets

Movements in the net carrying amount of concession intangible assets during 2007:


(€ million)

As of

December 31, 2006

Additions

Disposals

Impairment losses

Amortization

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2007

Concession intangible assets, gross

3,461.2

354.4

(55.7)

-

-

504.6

(60.9)

(11.7)

4,191.9

Amortization & impairment losses

(1,115.6)

-

44.1

0.4

(168.4)

(1.2)

4.0

34.0

(1,202.7)

Concession intangible assets, net

2,345.6

354.4

(11.6)

0.4

(168.4)

503.4

(56.9)

22.3

2,989.2


Additions concern the Water Division in the amount of €239.4 million, the Environmental Services Division in the amount of €10.8 million and the Energy Services Division in the amount of €104.1 million.

Changes in consolidation scope mainly concern the expansion of the Water Division in the amount of €502.8 million (mainly in China and the United Kingdom).

Foreign exchange translationlosses mainly concern the Water Division (-€49.4 million), following the depreciation of the Chinese yuan, the U.S. dollar and the pound sterling against the euro.

Other movements are primarily due to reclassifications resulting from finalization of the implementation of IFRIC 12 in the Water, Energy Services and Environmental Services Divisions.

Concession intangible assets by division break down as follows:


(€ million)



As of December 31, 2007

Net carrying amount as of December 31,

2006

Net carrying amount as of December 31,

2005

Gross carrying amount

Amortization & impairment losses

Net carrying amount

Water

3,091.6

(755.5)

2,336.1

1,766.4

1,533.8

Environmental Services

352.5

(109.8)

242.7

265.1

252.9

Energy Services

715.0

(326.2)

388.8

292.9

286.9

Transportation

-

-

-

-

-

Other

32.8

(11.2)

21.6

21.2

18.2

Concession intangible assets

4,191.9

(1,202.7)

2,989.2

2,345.6

2,091.8




F-32



Back to Contents


Recap: Movements  in the net carrying amount of concession intangible assets during 2006:


(€ million)

As of

December 31, 2005

Additions

Disposals

Impairment losses

Amortization

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of

December 31, 2006

Concession intangible assets, gross

3,202.0

296.5

(13.1)

-

-

127.1

(20.7)

(130.6)

3,461.2

Amortization & impairment losses

(1,110.2)

-

10.3

(7.8)

(139.9)

(0.8)

0.1

132.7

(1,115.6)

Concession intangible assets, net

2,091.8

296.5

(2.8)

(7.8)

(139.9)

126.3

(20.6)

2.1

2,345.6

Additions concern the Water Division in the amount of €231.7 million, the Environmental Services Division in the amount of €19.7 million and the Energy Services Division in the amount of €45.2 million.

Changes in consolidation scope mainly concern the expansion of the Water Division in the amount of €126.3 million (mainly in China).

Foreign exchange translation losses mainly concern the Water Division (-€22 million), following the depreciation of the Chinese yuan against the euro.


Note 5NOTE 6.


Other intangible assets


Movements in the net carrying amount of other intangible assets during 2005:2007:

(€ million)

As of December 31, 2006

Additions

Disposals

Amortization

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2007

Intangible assets with an indefinite useful life, net

34.6

14.4

(0.1)

(1.0)

55.6

(5.9)

(14.8)

82.8

Fees paid to local authorities

672,4

19,6

(3.2)

(64.0)

1.1

(4.2)

12.8

634.5

Purchased contractual rights

377.5

2.7

(0.1)

(56.0)

375.8

(5.5)

(98.5)

595.9

Purchased software

126.8

44.3

(1.2)

(50.6)

7.3

0.1

4.7

131.4

Purchased customer portfolios

22.0

1.1

(0.3)

(7.0)

36.0

(2.4)

1.0

50.4

Other purchased intangible assets

93.9

22.2

(2.4)

(19.9)

6.2

(8.0)

89.7

181.7

Other internally-developed intangible assets

52.6

6.3

(0.2)

(4.0)

-

(2.5)

(22.5)

29.7

Intangible assets with a definite useful life net

1,345.2

96.2

(7.3)

(201.5)

426.4

(22.5)

(12.8)

1,623.6

Other intangible assets

1,379.8

110.6

(7.4)

(202.5)

482.0

(28.4)

(27.6)

1,706.4




F-33


(€ million)

As of December
31, 2004

Acquisitions

Disposals

Amortization

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December
31, 2005

Fees paid to local authorities

654.9

8.2

(1.0)

(60.7)

4.1

7.1

38.7

651.3

Trademarks

27.8

10.5

(8.0)

(4.9)

(2.2)

1.2

(5.2)

19.2

Internally-developed software

7.6

2.1

-

(2.7)

-

-

2.2

9.2

Purchased software

122.0

38.9

(2.5)

(49.9)

5.5

0.9

5.4

120.3

Other internally-developed intangible assets

49.0

0.4

-

(0.5)

0.7

7.2

(7.2)

49.6

Other purchased intangible assets

197.7

29.0

(0.9)

(55.1)

111.2

20.5

19.5

321.9

Other intangible assets

1,059.0

89.1

(12.4)

(173.8)

119.3

36.9

53.4

1,171.5


Back to Contents


NoIntangible assets with an indefinite useful life are primarily trademarks.

Changes in consolidation scope impacting intangible assets with an indefinite life mainly concern the fair value measurement in the Transportation Division of Supershuttle International acquisitions in the United States (€35.0 million).

Fees paid to local authorities in respect of public service contracts totaled €634.5 million as of December 31, 2007. The amortization of fees paid at the beginning of concession arrangements in the Water Division, calculated over the contract term, totaled €60.8 million in 2007.

Changes in consolidation scope impacting contractual rights mainly concern the fair value measurement of Water Division assets in respect of acquisitions in the United States (Tetra Technologies for €21.3 million) and the United Kingdom for €23.9 million and acquisitions by the Environmental Services Division in Germany (€275.8 million) and Italy (€28.9 million).

Other intangible assets break down as follows:


(€ million)

As of December
31, 2007

As of
December
31, 2006

As of December
31, 2005

Intangible assets with an indefinite useful life, net

82.8

34.6

29.7

Intangible assets with a definite useful life, gross

3,168.6

2,749.4

2,490.0

Amortization and impairment losses

(1,545.0)

(1,404.2)

(1,238.3)

Intangible assets with a definite useful life, net

1,623.6

1,345.2

1,251.7

Intangible assets, net

1,706.4

1,379.8

1,281.4


Recap: Movements in the net carrying amount of other intangible assets during 2006:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

Additions

Disposals

Amortization

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2006

Fees paid to local authorities

696.8

20.5

(1.1)

(62.2)

-

(5.1)

23.5

672.4

Contractual rights

212.2

-

-

(18.1)

142.4

0.8

40.2

377.5

Purchased software

118.9

46.2

(0.9)

(49.0)

2.0

(0.1)

9.7

126.8

Trademarks

19.2

19.2

(1.2)

(2.3)

(4.5)

(1.6)

(4.3)

24.5

Internally-developed software

3.2

0.9

-

(1.9)

-

-

0.2

2.4

Other internally-developed intangible assets

38.9

7.9

-

(6.5)

0.1

(3.9)

7.3

43.8

Other purchased intangible assets

192.2

22.4

(0.2)

(33.1)

23.3

(3.6)

(68.6)

132.4

Other intangible assets

1,281.4

117.1

(3.4)

(173.1)

163.3

(13.5)

8.0

1,379.8

Other intangible assets transferred to Assets classified as held for sale in 2006 totaled €0.2 million. No amounts were transferred to Assets of discontinued operationsclassified as held for sale in 2004 or 2005.

Fees paid to local authorities in respect of public service contracts totaled €651€672.4 million as of December 31, 2005 compared to €655 million as of December 31, 2004. They include the2006. The amortization over the contract term of fees paid at the beginning of concession contracts with Compagnie Générale des Eaux of -€36 million and with its regional subsidiaries of -€14 million.

Other intangible asset additions (mainly contractual rights)arrangements in the French Water Division totaled €322€49.3 million in 2005 compared to €198 million in 2004. The increase in 2005 was due to:

the impact of entries into the consolidation scope in the Water Division for €67 million (mainly Braunschweig for €24 million and Enel Hydro for €12 million, engineering activities in the United States for €12 million and Acqua Spa for €9 million), in the Transportation Division for €15 million (mainly ATC Vancom in the United States for €12 million), in the Energy Services Division for €10 million and in the Waste Management Division for €5 million.

the impact of the buyout of minority interests in Acqua Latina in Italy in the Water Division for €12 million.

The intangible asset amortization charge for 2005 is €174 million, compared to €142 million in 2004. Accumulated amortization is -€1,243 million as of December 31, 2005, compared to -€1,006 million as of December 31, 2004.


Other intangible assets break down as follows:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

Intangible assets with an indefinite useful life, net

31.4

10.3

Intangible assets with a definite useful life, gross

2,383.3

2,055.2

Amortization

(1,243.2)

(1,006.5)

Intangible assets with a definite useful life, net

1,140.1

1,048.7

Other intangible assets

1,171.5

1,059.0


In 2005, indefinite life intangible assets mainly include trademarks related to engineering activities in the United States for €12 million in the Water Division, and Transportation Division licenses for €5 million.2006.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-13F-34



Back to contentsContents



Impairment tests as of December 31, 2005:

The net carrying amount of intangible assets with an indefinite useful life is reviewed at least once annuallyChanges in accordance withconsolidation scope impacting contractual rights mainly concern Cleanaway United Kingdom (€37.2 million) and acquisitions by the principles disclosedWater Division in note 1.10. No impairment losses were recognized in 2005.China (€58.7 million) and Slovakia (€40.1 million).


Note 6NOTE 7.

Property, plant and equipment


Movements in the net carrying amount of property, plant and equipment during 2005:2007:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2004

Acquisitions

Disposals

Impairment losses

Depreciation

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2005

Property, plant and equipment, gross

13,287.7

1,069.3

(703.1)

-

-

864.3

484.4

9.6

15,012.2

Depreciation

(7,150.4)

-

569.9

4.3

(960.6)

(523.2)

(221.9)

(8.3)

(8,290.2)

Property, plant and equipment, net

6,137.3

1,069.3

(133.2)

4.3

(960.6)

341.1

262.5

1.3

6,722.0


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2006

Additions

Disposals

Impairment losses

Depreciation

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2007

Property, plant and equipment, gross

16,912.0

1,927.6

(699.6)

-

-

1,207.5

(421.0)

(40.6)

18,885.9

Depreciation

(8,993.3)

-

557.1

(35.7)

(1,179.5)

(168.1)

177.3

(40.5)

(9,682.7)

Property, plant and equipment, net

7,918.7

1,927.6

(142.5)

(35.7)

(1,179.5)

1,039.4

(243.7)

(81.1)

9,203.2

Net carrying amount of property, plant and equipment of €3.2€110.7 million in 2004 and €1.2 million in 2005 was transferred to Assets classified as held for sale (including the  “Jean Nicoli” boat owned by the Transportation Division in the amount of discontinued operations.€103.9 million), compared to €44.0 million in 2006 (vehicles in Denmark and incinerators in the United Kingdom).

Property, plant and equipmentacquisitionsAdditionsconcern the Water Division (€223.6 million), Waste Managementin the amount of €365.6 million, the Environmental Services Division (€549.2 million),in the amount of €873,4 million, the Energy Services Division (€98.3 million)in the amount of €207.1 million and the Transportation Division (€186.9 million).in the amount of €449.7 million.

Property, plantDisposals, net of provisions and equipmentdisposalsdepreciation, concern the Water Division in the amount of €20.7 million, the Environmental Services Division in the amount of €59.5 million and the Transportation Division in the amount of €51.6 million.

Impairment losses mainly concern the impairment of Rimsa assets (Mexico) in the Environmental Services Division for €29.6 million, following the resolution of a dispute resulting in the receipt of compensation in the same amount.

Changes in consolidation scope mainly concern the acquisition of Thermal North America Inc. (€39.9398.9 million), Waste Management DivisionPannon Power (€54.469.4 million), Delitzsch (€24.6 million) and Kolin (€23.0 million) by the Energy Services Division (€8.2 million) and Transportationthe Sulo Group by the Environmental Services Division (€29.9346.5 million).

Foreign exchange translation adjustments losses mainly concern the Water Division (€49.2 million), Waste Management Division (€169 million), Energy Services Division (€24.0 million) and Transportation Division (€12.2 million), following the appreciationdepreciation of the U.S. dollar and the pound sterling against the euro in the Water (-€119.1 million) and Environmental Services (-€137.5 million) Divisions.

Other movements mainly concern the reclassification of the “Jean Nicoli” boat as held for sale in the amount of -€103.9 million and the Chinese yuan againstsale of Transportation activities in Denmark in the euro.amount of €62.8 million (€113.5 million gross carrying amount and depreciation of €50.7 million).

An agreement was signed on December 11, 2007 for the sale of the “Jean Nicoli” boat and the effective transfer of ownership is scheduled for April 1, 2008.



F-35



Back to Contents


Property, plant and equipment by division break down as follows:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

Net carrying amount as of December 31,2004

 

Gross carrying amount

Depreciation &
impairment losses

Net carrying amount

Water

3,778.1

(1,803.4)

1,974.7

1,888.2

Waste Management

6,304.3

(3,572.1)

2,732.2

2,459.2

Energy Services

2,172.0

(1,342.5)

829.5

713.3

Transportation

2,607.3

(1,513.3)

1,094.0

999.8

Other

150.5

(58.9)

91.6

76.8

Property, plant and equipment

15,012.2

(8,290.2)

6,722.0

6,137.3


(€ million)



As of December 31, 2007

Net carrying amount as of December 31,
2006

Net carrying amount as of December 31,
2005

Gross carrying amount

Depreciation & impairment losses

Net carrying amount

Water

4,363.7

(2,112.8)

2,250.9

2,258.2

2,107.0

Environmental Services

7,922.8

(4,284.7)

3,638.1

3,104.3

2,821.5

Energy Services

2,870.7

(1,253.4)

1,617.3

955.9

819.4

Transportation

3,564.2

(1,961.2)

1,603.0

1,518.6

1,066.5

Other

164.5

(70.6)

93.9

81.7

71.3

Property, plant and equipment

18,885.9

(9,682.7)

9,203.2

7,918.7

6,885.7


The breakdown of property, plant and equipment by class of assets is as follows:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

Net carrying amount as
of December 31,2004

As of December 31, 2007

Net carrying amount as of December 31,
2006

Gross carrying amount

Depreciation &
impairment losses

Net carrying amount

(€ million)



Gross carrying amount

Depreciation & impairment losses

Net carrying amount

Net carrying amount as of December 31,
2006

1,221.8

(451.8)

770.0

749.4

1,387.8

(528.0)

859.8

Buildings

2,376.2

(1,119.1)

1,257.1

1,114.5

2,984.0

(1,323.7)

1,660.3

1,323.8

Technical systems

6,774.7

(3,895.5)

2,879.2

2,524.5

Assets under construction

274.1

(7.5)

266.6

327.7

Other

4,365.4

(2,816.3)

1,549.1

1,421.2

Technical installations, plant and equipment

7,282.6

(3,782.8)

3,499.8

2,951.6

Traveling systems and other vehicles

4,675.0

(2,721.0)

1,954.0

1,787.7

Other property, plant and equipment

1,934.4

(1,318.5)

615.9

539.8

Returnable assets

12.3

(5.9)

6.4

65.8

Owned property, plant and equipment in progress

606.8

(2.8)

604.0

398.0

Property, plant and equipment in progress

3.0

-

3.0

5.6

Property, plant and equipment

15,012.2

(8,290.2)

6,722.0

6,137.3

18,885.9

(9,682.7)

9,203.2

7,918.7



Note 7


Publicly-owned utility networks



Recap: Movements in the net carrying amount of publicly-owned utility networksproperty, plant and equipment during 2005:2006:

 (€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

Additions

Disposals

Impairment losses

Depreciation

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,
2006

Property, plant and equipment, gross

14,972.9

1,424.5

(635.6)

-

-

1,450.5

(125.0)

(175.3)

16,912.0

Depreciation

(8,087.2)

-

530.4

(60.2)

(1,055.3)

(621.4)

63.0

237.4

(8,993.3)

Property, plant and equipment, net

6,885.7

1,424.5

(105.2)

(60.2)

(1,055.3)

829.1

(62.0)

62.1

7,918.7



F-36


(€ million)

As of December 31,2004

Acquisitions

Disposals

Impairment losses

Depreciation/ reversals

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,2005

Publicly-owned utility networks, gross

8,026.4

598.5

(81.5)

-

-

394.4

91.5

50.5

9,079.8

Depreciation

(3,205.6)

-

67.5

0.6

(297.5)

(1.9)

(25.6)

12.2

(3,450.3)

Publicly-owned utility networks, net

4,820.8

598.5

(14.0)

0.6

(297.5)

392.5

65.9

62.7

5,629.5


Back to Contents


No amounts wereNet property, plant and equipment of €44.0 million was transferred to Assets of discontinued operationsclassified as held for sale (vehicles in 2004 orDenmark and incinerators in the United Kingdom), compared to €1.2 million in 2005.

AcquisitionsAdditions concern the Water Division (€387.0 million), Waste Managementin the amount of €322.3 million, the Environmental Services Division (€177.3 million) andin the amount of €648.0 million, the Energy Services Division (€31.4 million).in the amount of €139.7 million and the Transportation Division in the amount of €290.3 million.

Disposals concern the Water Division (-€7.5 million), Waste Managementin the amount of €5.8 million, the Environmental Services Division (-€1.4 million) andin the amount of €41.9 million, the Energy Services Division (-€4.9 million).in the amount of €11.5 million and the Transportation Division in the amount of €43.3 million.

Impairment losses mainly concern the remeasurement at fair value of Transportation Division assets in the amount of €63 million, including €44 million in respect of assets located in Denmark (impairment losses recognized in "Net income (expense) from discontinued operations" in the Income Statement) and the impairment of an engine shed in the amount  of €18 million, relating to the operation of a railway contract in Germany.

Changes in consolidation scope mainly concern the acquisition of SNCM by the assetsTransportation Division (€393 million), of Cleanaway United Kingdom (€223 million) and Biffa Belgium (€27 million) by the Environmental Services Division and of companies in China by the Water Division (€24 million).

Other movements mainly concern the definitive allocation of the water services company serving the town of BraunschweigZEC Lodz purchase price (Energy Services in Germany,Poland) in the amount of €390.1€84.5 million.

Foreign exchange translation adjustments concern the Water Division (€54.8 million) and Waste Management Division (€10.3 million), following the appreciation of the U.S. dollar, the pound sterling and the Chinese yuan against the euro.




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-14



Back to contents


Publicly-owned utility networks by Division break down as follows:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

Net carrying amount
as of December 31, 2004

 

Gross carrying amount

Depreciation & Impairment losses

Net carrying amount

Water

7,487.3

(2,900.6)

4,586.7

3,928.7

Waste Management

991.0

(241.0)

750.0

603.1

Energy Services

577.8

(288.8)

289.0

280.2

Transportation

0.3

(0.1)

0.2

0.1

Other

23.4

(19.8)

3.6

8.7

Publicly-owned utility networks

9,079.8

(3,450.3)

5,629.5

4,820.8



Note 8


NOTE 8.

Investments in associates


The principal investments in associates with a value of greater than €10 million as of December 31, 2007 are as follows:


 

As of December 31,

 

% holding

Share in equity

Share of net income

 

2005

2004

2005

2004

2005

2004

       

Domino(1)

-

15.00%

-

15.2

-

-0.2

Fovarosi Csatomazasi Muvek Reszvenytarsasag

25.00%

25.00%

93.1

94.2

1.5

1.2

Tiru

24.00%

24.00%

10.7

11.5

(0.8)

5.1

Grand Bahamas

49.00%

49.00%

13.9

12.1

1.3

1.6

Technoborgo(2)

-

49.00%

-

6.5

-

1.5

CICG

41.95%

41.97%

5.6

5.4

0.3

0.2

PCP Holding(3)

-

19.08%

-

10.0

-

3.6

Southern Water Investments Limited

25.00%

19.90%

17.7

11.7

8.4

2.2

Other (per unit < €5 million)



60.5

52.6

4.2

9.0

Investments in associates



201.5

219.2

14.9

24.2

 

As of December 31,

% control

Share in equity

Share of net income

2007

2006

2005

2007

2006

2005

2007

2006

2005

Fovarosi Csatomazasi Muvek

25.00%

25.00%

25.00%

95.7

95.4

93.1

1.0

0.8

1.5

Cie Méridionale de Navigation

45.00%

45.00%

-

34.9

28.0

-

6.9

5.1

-

TIRU

24.00%

24.00%

24.00%

13.1

13.6

10.7

0.1

2.2

(0.8)

Cie Méridionale de Participations

45.00%

45.00%

-

12.5

12.4

-

0.1

-

-

Other amounts < €10 million in 2006 and 2007

   

135.9

91.6

97.7

8.8

(2.1)

5.8

Investments in associates

   

292.1

241.0

201.5

16.9

6.0

6.5

(1)

Investment reclassified as a non-consolidated investment as not satisfying the “significant influence” criteria as of December 31, 2005.

(2)F-37

Change in consolidation method: proportionate consolidation from 2005.


(3)

Sold in 2005Back to Contents


Movements in investments in associates in 2005:2007:


(€ million)

% holding as of December 31, 2005

2004

Net income

Dividend distribution

Foreign exchange translation

Changes in consolidation scope

Other

2005

         

Domino

-

15.2

-

-

-

-

(15.2)

-

Fovarosi Csatomazasi Muvek Reszvenytarsasag

25.00%

94.2

1.5

-

(2.6)

-

-

93.1

Tiru

24.00%

11.5

(0.8)

-

-

-

-

10.7

Grand Bahamas

49.00%

12.1

1.3

(1.4)

1.9

-

-

13.9

Technoborgo

-

6.5

-

-

-

(6.5)

-

-

CICG

41.95%

5.4

0.3

(0.1)

-

-

-

5.6

PCP Holding

-

10.0

-

-

-

(10.0)

-

-

Southern Water Investments Limited

25.00%

11.7

8.4

(5.1)

2.2

3.7

(3.2)

17.7

Other (per unit < €5 million)

 

52.6

4.2

(3.7)

0.9

6.4

0.1

60.5

Investments in associates

 

219.2

14.9

(10.3)

2.4

(6.4)

(18.3)

201.5

(€ million)

% control as of December 31, 2007

2006

Net income

Dividend distribution

Foreign exchange translation

Changes in consolidation scope

Other

2007

Fovarosi Csatomazasi Muvek

25.00%

95.4

1.0

-

(0.7)

-

-

95.7

Cie Méridionale de Navigation

45.00%

28.0

6.9

-

-

-

-

34.9

TIRU

24.00%

13.6

0.1

-

(0.5)

-

(0.1)

13.1

Cie Méridionale de Participations

45.00%

12.4

0.1

-

-

-

-

12.5

Other amounts < €10 million in 2006 and 2007

 

91.6

8.8

(6.5)

(1.8)

43.1

0.7

135.9

Investments in associates

 

241.0

16.9

(6.5)

(3.0)

43.1

0.6

292.1


No amounts were transferred to Assets of discontinued operationsclassified as held for sale in 20042005, 2006 or 2005.2007.


Summarized financial information for the main investments in associates is as follows (100% of amounts):


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

Non-current assets

4,872.7

4,992.1

Current assets

1,414.4

2,005.1

Total assets

6,287.1

6,997.2

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

524.0

696.8

Minority interests

1.4

6.8

Non-current liabilities

4,735.8

5,046.0

Current liabilities

1,025.9

1,247.6

Total equity and liabilities

6,287.1

6,997.2

Income statement

  

Revenue

1,085.5

1,449.0

Operating income

355.6

373.1

Net income for the year

37.1

53.2


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Non-current assets

870.8

848.6

4,872.7

Current assets

310.4

256.7

1,414.4

Total assets

1,181.2

1,105.3

6,287.1

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

618.7


586.3


524.0

Minority interests

0.8

1.0

1.4

Non-current liabilities

325.2

263.1

4,735.8

Current liabilities

236.5

254.9

1,025.9

Total equity and liabilities

1,181.2

1,105.3

6,287.1

Income Statement

 

  

Revenue

377.6

329.5

1,085.5

Operating income

31.6

37.2

355.6

Net income for the year

14.9

24.6

37.1



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-15F-38



Back to contentsContents


Recap: Movements in investments in associates during 2006:


(€ million)

% control as of December 31, 2006

2005

Net income

Dividend distribution

Foreign exchange translation

Changes in consolidation scope

Other

2006

Fovarosi Csatomazasi Muvek

25.00%

93.1

0.8

-

0.5

-

1.0

95.4

Cie Méridionale de Navigation

45.00%

-

5.1

-

-

22.9

-

28.0

TIRU

24.00%

10.7

2.2

-

0.7

-

-

13.6

Cie Meridionale de Participations

45.00%

-

-

-

-

12.5

(0.1)

12.4

CICG

41.97%

5.6

0.3

-

-

 

-

5.9

KVW Investment Co Ltd

49.00%

5.3

0.8

-

(0.5)

-

(0.1)

5.5

Shanghai Laogang Landfil

30.00%

5.2

0.6

-

(0.4)

-

0.1

5.5

EED ES Tersege Vizikozmu KFT

20.80%

-

0.1

-

-

5.0

-

5.1

TA HO ONYX RSEA ENVT (YUNLIN)

33.30%

-

(4.2)

-

(2.4)

10.4

(0.1)

3.7

Urban Sanitation

50.00%

13.9

-

-

-

(13.9)

-

-

Southern Water Investments Limited

-

17.7

-

-

-

(17.7)

-

-

Other amounts < €5 million in 2005 and 2006

 

50.0

0.3

(4.1)

(2.1)

14.9

6.9

65.9

Investments in associates

 

201.5

6.0

(4.1)

(4.2)

34.1

7.7

241.0



Note 9NOTE 9.


Non-consolidated investments


Pursuant to IAS 39, non-consolidated investments are classified as available-for-sale and, as such, recognized at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses are taken directly to equity, except for unrealized losses considered long-term which are expensed in the Income Statement.


Movements in the fair value of non-consolidated investments during 2005:2007:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2004

Acquisitions

Disposals

Changes in consolidation scope

Fair value adjustments

Impairment losses

Other

As of December 31, 2005

As of

December 31, 2006

Additions

Disposals

Changes in consolidation scope

Fair value adjustments

Impairment losses (1)

Other

As of

December 31, 2007

Non-consolidated investments

181.1

65.3

(18.3)

(35.3)

0.3

(0.8)

17.2

209.5

181.7

51.7

(2.9)

(3.4)

32.6

1.0

(4.6)

256.1

(1) Impairment losses are recorded in financial income and expenses.

(1) Impairment losses are recorded in financial income and expenses.


Other movements include the reclassification in non-consolidated investments in 2005 of the Domino SaneparFair value adjustments mainly concern Mediterranea Delle Acque shares held by Proactiva in the amount of €20.7 million, following the loss of significant influence over this company. As of December 31, 2004, these shares were recognized€29.8 million.



F-39



Back to Contents


Non-consolidated investments break down as follows:


 (€ million)

% holding as of December 31, 2007

Gross carrying amount as of December 31, 2007

Impairment losses

Fair value adjustments

Net carrying amount as of December 31, 2007

Net carrying amount as of December 31, 2006

Net carrying amount as of December 31, 2005

Méditerranea delle Acque (formerly Genova Acque) (1)

17.1%

26.3

-

29.5

55.8

26.0

25.7

Avacon (1)

1.3%

25.0

-

1.6

26.6

25.0

-

Domino Sanepar (1)

15.0%

20.7

-

(0.1)

20.6

20.7

20.7

Gaz de Bordeaux (1)

24.0%

17.5

-

2.9

20.4

19.3

4.6

SEBS - GmbH (2)

-

-

-

-

-

-

27.0

Net carrying amount per unit < €20 million in 2007 and 2006

 

154.6

(22.1)

0.2

132.7

90.7

131.5

Non-consolidated investments

 

244.1

(22.1)

34.1

256.1

181.7

209.5

(1)

Investment not consolidated as do not satisfy the "significant influence" criteria.

(2)

Company consolidated in 2006.


Recap: Movements in non-consolidated investments in associates.during 2006:


(€ million)

As of

December 31, 2005

Additions

Disposals

Changes in consolidation scope

Fair value adjustments

Impairment losses (1)

Other

As of

December 31,2006

Non-consolidated investments

209.5

33.2

(11.9)

(65.7)

0.8

(2.5)

18.3

181.7

(1)

Impairment losses are recorded in financial income and expenses.

Acquisitions mainly concern SEBS Gmbh (Braunschweig Assainissement) and Kralove Hradecthe acquisition of an additional 8% interest in Gaz de Bordeaux by the Energy Services Division for €27.0 million and €14.8 million respectively.a consideration of €12.8 million.

The principal disposal was the sale of Aque Potabili for €17.1Ecofin (United Kingdom) shares held by the Water Division in the amount of -€6.6 million.

Changes in consolidation scope mainly concern the consolidation in 2006 of Rev Suisse in the amount of €13.2company carrying the Hradec Kralove contract (Water Division, Czech Republic) and SEBS (Water Division, Germany) for -€14.8 million and Vodarny Stredoceske-€27 million respectively and Ta-Ho Yunlin (Environmental Services Division, China) for -€10.0 million.

Other movements concern the reclassification of an investment previously recorded in the amount of €13.1 million."Other long-term investments".



F-40



Back to Contents


Non-consolidated investments break down as follows:


Non-consolidated investments(€ million)

% interest as of December 31, 2005

Gross carrying amount as of December 31, 2005

Impairment losses

Fair value adjustments

Net carrying amount
as of December 31, 2005

Net carrying amount
as of December 31, 2004

SEBS – Gmbh(1)

100.00%

27.0

-

-

27.0

-

Genova Aque(2)

20.00%

25.0

-

0.7

25.7

25.6

Domino Sanepar(2)

15.00%

20.7

-

-

20.7

-

Kralove Hradec(1)

66.00%

14.8

-

-

14.8

-

Ta-Ho Yunlin(4)

33.30%

10.4

(0.4)

-

10.0

10.2

Aque Potabili(3)

-

-

-

-

-

17.1

Rev Suisse(5)

100.00%

-

-

-

-

13.2

Vodarny Stredoceske(5)

99.76%

-

-

-

-

13.1

Other (per unit < €10 million in 2005)


131.2

(23.8)

3.9

111.3

101.9

Non-consolidated investments


229.1

(24.2)

4.6

209.5

181.1

(1)

Company purchased at the end of 2005 and consolidated in 2006.

(2)

Investment not consolidated as not satisfying the “significant influence” criteria.

(3)

Sold in 2005

(4)

Project at development stage

(5)

Consolidated in 2005



Movements in unrealized gains and losses recognized in fiscal years 2004 and 2005 are not significant.


Note 10NOTE 10.


Non-current and current operating financial assets

Long-termOperating financial assets comprise financial assets resulting from the application of IFRIC 12 on accounting for concession arrangements and from the application of IFRIC 4 loans(see Note 1.22).


Movements in the net carrying amount of long-term IFRIC 4 loansnon-current and current operating financial assets during 2005:2007:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2004

Acquisitions

Repayments  / removals

Impairment losses

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2006

New financial assets

Repayments/ disposals

Impairment losses (1)

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Non-current / current reclassification

Other

As of

December 31, 2007

Gross

1,693.5

252.7

(176.6)

-

8.8

101.2

23.9

1,903.5

5,139.4

414.2

(36.4)

-

212.8

(98.3)

(355.9)

2.6

5,278.4

Impairment losses

-

-

(1.5)

-

(0.1)

-

(1.6)

(6.0)

-

(6.0)

Long-term IFRIC 4 loans, net

1,693.5

252.7

(176.6)

(1.5)

8.8

101.1

23.9

1,901.9

Non-current operating financial assets

5,133.4

414.2

(36.4)

-

212.8

(98.3)

(355.9)

2.6

5,272.4

Gross

326.2

6.3

(324.3)

-

5.0

(4.5)

355.9

(9.4)

355.2

Impairment losses

-

-

-

Current operating financial assets

326.2

6.3

(324.3)

-

5.0

(4.5)

355.9

(9.4)

355.2

Non-current and current operating financial assets

5,459.6

420.5

(360.7)

-

217.8

(102.8)

-

(6.8)

5,627.6

(1)

Impairment losses are recorded in operating income.

(1)

Impairment losses are recorded in operating income.



Long-term IFRIC 4 loans by division break down as follows:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

Water

874.0

639.4

Waste Management

261.2

251.6

Energy Services

686.1

717.3

Transportation

80.6

85.2

Long-term IFRIC 4 loans, net

1,901.9

1,693.5


The €208.4 million increase compared to 2004principalnew operating financial assets in long-term IFRIC 4 loans is2007 mainly attributable to majorconcern:

the Water Division constructionand in particular projects in BrusselsBerlin (€140.8 million), the Oman Sur BOT contract (€46.8 million) and the HagueVeolia Water Hynix industrial contract in Korea (€12826.2 million). The decrease in loans in ;

the Energy Services Division is due to and in particular cogeneration plants (€19.5 million).

The principalrepayments of operating financial assets in 2007 concern:

the repaymentWater Division and in particular projects in Berlin (-€139.5 million);

the Energy Services Division and in particular cogeneration plants (-€60.9 million).

Foreign exchange translation losses mainly concern the Water Division (-€60.1 million) and the Environmental Services Division (-€41.1 million), following the depreciation of cogeneration loans.the Korean won, the U.S. dollar and the pound sterling against the euro.

Changes in consolidation scope mainly concern the acquisition of VSA Tecnitalia by the Energy Services Division for €222.5 million.

Other movements primarily concern the reclassification of financial assets as “concession intangible assets” following IFRIC 12 analyses in the Water, Energy Services and Environmental Services Divisions.




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-16F-41



Back to contentsContents


Note 11

The breakdown by division is as follows:


(€ million)

As of December 31,

Non-current assets

Current assets

Total

2007

2006

2005

2007

2006

2005

2007

2006

2005

Water

3,719.4

3,667.0

3,808.1

165.1

163.5

55.2

3,884.5

3,830.5

3,863.3

Environmental Services

858.1

711.2

730.5

44.3

25.8

18.7

902.4

737.0

749.2

Energy Services

585.4

651.0

709.1

126.9

120.1

113.0

712.3

771.1

822.1

Transportation

104.3

98.8

83.5

18.7

16.6

20.9

123.0

115.4

104.4

Other

5.2

5.4

6.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

5.4

5.6

6.4

Operating financial assets

5,272.4

5,133.4

5,337.4

355.2

326.2

208.0

5,627.6

5,459.6

5,545.4



IFRIC 12 operating financial assets maturity schedule:


(€ million)

1 year

2 years

3 to 5 years

More than five years

Total

Water

145.1

171.2

570.1

2,610.5

3,496.9

Environmental Services

35.1

24.1

142.5

617.9

819.6

Energy Services

16.4

14.7

21.0

29.9

82.0

Transportation

18.7

19.4

25.2

59.7

123.0

Other

0.2

0.5

1.1

3.6

5.4

Total

215.5

229.9

759.9

3,321.6

4,526.9



IFRIC 4 operating financial assets maturity schedule:


(€ million)

1 year

2 years

3 to 5 years

More than five years

Total

Water

20.0

25.0

89.0

253.6

387.6

Environmental Services

9.2

9.5

28.6

35.5

82.8

Energy Services

110.5

125.3

241.3

153.2

630.3

Transportation

-

-

-

-

-

Other

-

-

-

-

-

Total

139.7

159.8

358.9

442.3

1,100.7




F-42



Back to Contents


Recap: Movements in the net carrying amount of non-current and current operating financial assets during 2006:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

New financial assets

Repayments/ disposals

Impairment losses (1)

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2006

Gross

5,547.6

360.6

(438.1)

-

12.7

(40.8)

23.6

5,465.6

Impairment losses

(2.2)

-

-

(3.9)

-

0.2

(0.1)

(6.0)

Non-current and current operating financial assets

5,545.4

360.6

(438.1)

(3.9)

12.7

(40.6)

23.5

5,459.6

(1)

Impairment losses are recorded in operating income.

The principal new operating financial assets in 2006 mainly concern:

the Water Division and in particular projects in Berlin (€115.2 million), the Brussels BOT contract (€62.9 million) and the Haye BOT contract (€27.2 million);

the Energy Services Division and in particular cogeneration plants in France (€45.1 million).

The principal repayments of operating financial assets in 2006 concern:

the Water Division and in particular projects in Berlin (-€130.8 million) and the Brussels BOT contract (-€95.3 million);

the Energy Services Division and in particular cogeneration plants in France (-€112.4 million).

Other movements concern transfers from non-current financial receivables to operating financial assets.


NOTE 11.

Other long-term loans and investments


non-current financial assets

Movements in the value of other long-term loans and investmentsnon-current financial assets during 2005:2007:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2004

Acquisitions

Disposals/ Repayments

Changes in consolidation scope

Impairment losses

Fair value adjustments

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2005

As of

December 31, 2006

Additions

Repayments/ disposals

Changes in consolidation scope

Impairment losses (1)

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of

December 31, 2007

Gross

475.6

62.1

(55.7)

(0.3)

-

(1.2)

25.0

(10.2)

495.3

604.8

66.2

(69.5)

(4.0)

-

(5.5)

(19.4)

572.6

Impairment losses

(61.0)

-

-

-

1.7

-

(8.8)

0.5

(67.6)

(58.8)

-

(0.4)

(0.2)

6.0

(4.2)

(57.6)

Other long-term loans, net

414.6

62.1

(55.7)

(0.3)

1.7

(1.2)

16.2

(9.7)

427.7

Gross

211.8

63.1

(24.6)

34.6

-

(7.1)

9.3

(6.1)

281.0

Impairment losses

(11.7)

-

-

(2.3)

(2.9)

-

(0.6)

1.3

(16.2)

Other investments, net

200.1

63.1

(24.6)

32.3

(2.9)

(7.1)

8.7

(4.8)

264.8

Other long-term loans and investments, net

614.7

125.2

(80.3)

32.0

(1.2)

(8.3)

24.9

(14.5)

692.5

Non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

546,0

66.2

(69.5)

(4.4)

(0.2)

0.5

(23.6)

515.0

Other non-current financial assets

91.5

161.2

(16.3)

18.6

(1.8)

(7.5)

(14.7)

231.0

Total Other non-current financial assets

637.5

227.4

(85.8)

14.2

(2.0)

(7.0)

(38.3)

746.0

(1)

Impairment losses are recorded in financial income and expenses.

(1)

Impairment losses are recorded in financial income and expenses.




F-43



Back to Contents


Non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

Additions mainly correspond to the change in the non-Group portion of the loan to Dalkia International for €39.1 million.

As ofDecember 31, 2007, the principal non-current financial assets in loans and receivables primarily correspond to the non-Group portion of loans granted to companies consolidated on a proportionate basis for €238.7 million (mainly Dalkia International).

Other non-current financial assets are recorded as available-for-sale assets.

Additions mainly correspond to the non current part of an investment under escrow account with a view to the acquisition of Tianjin Shibei shares in China for €113.2 million (Water Division).

Other movements notably concern  the non-Group portion of loans granted to proportionately consolidated companies  for -€50.9 million (mainly Dalkia and Berlin) and the reclassification in non-current financial assets of repayment entitlements relating to benefits granted to Australian employees in the Transportation Division for +€23.0 million.

Recap: Movements in the value of other non-current financial assets during 2006:

(€ million)

As of

December 31, 2005

Additions

Repayments/ disposals

Changes in consolidation scope

Impairment losses (1)

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of

December 31, 2006

Gross

496.0

69.4

(29.2)

2.7

-

(15.3)

(21.6)

502.0

Impairment losses

(67.6)

-

-

-

2.4

6.6

-

(58.6)

Other long-term loans, net

428.4

69.4

(29.2)

2.7

2.4

(8.7)

(21.6)

443.4

Gross

279.4

27.8

(22.3)

(45.5)

-

(3.2)

(29.7)

206.5

Impairment losses

(16.2)

-

-

-

3.4

0.4

-

(12.4)

Other investments, net

263.2

27.8

(22.3)

(45.5)

3.4

(2.8)

(29.7)

194.1

Other non-current financial assets, net

691.6

97.2

(51.5)

(42.8)

5.8

(11.5)

(51.3)

637.5

(1)

Impairment losses are recorded in financial income and expenses.


Other long-term loans, net

Additions mainly correspond to the non-Group portion of a loan granted to a proportionately consolidated company.

Other movements concern the transfer of assets to operating financial assets.

Other long-term loans as ofDecember 31, 20052006 mainly include:

Ø

Aa deposit paid related toin respect of the Berlin contract held by Veolia Water GermanyWasser GmbH (Water Division, Germany) of €97.3 million;

Ø

Water Division loans of €22 million in the United States of €32 million;States;

Ø

Paymentpayment guarantee deposits of €49.4€36.7 million and other deposits of €20.9 million;

Ø

Variousthe non-Group portion of loans granted to non-group subsidiariesproportionately consolidated companies of €30€160.2 million.

ImpairmentCumulatedimpairment losses on other long-term loans mainly include the impairment of Water Division long-term loans in the USU.S. in the cumulative amount of €58.0-€57.1 million as of December 31, 20042006 and €63.7-€63.7 million as of December 31, 2005 (change in amount(the decrease is mainly due to currency effects on US dollar)changes in the U.S. dollar exchange rate).



F-44



Back to Contents


Other investments, net

Changes in consolidationthe scope as of December 31, 2005consolidation include the additionescrow accounts intended to finance Water Division investments in China in the amount of -€45.4 million (€21.1 million in respect of the Kunming contract and €24.3 million in respect of the Changhou contract), the impact of the sale of Southern Water preferential shares in the amount of €27.4-€66.3 million followingand a collateral guarantee including an advance from the acquisition of the water services company serving the town of Braunschweig (Veolia Water Germany).

The increaseFrench State to SNCM in other investments is mainly due to the new collateral guarantees intended to be invested in the contracts  Changzou and Kunming (Veolia Water China) for the amount of €24.3 million and €21.1 million respectively at€38.5 million.

Othermovements notably concern the balance sheet date.transfer of other investments to Non-consolidated investments.

Other investments as ofDecember 31, 20052006 mainly include:

Ø

Southern Water preferred shares in the amount of €66.3 million (Veolia Water UK);

Ø

Guaranteeguarantee deposits paid to suppliers and others in the amount of €12.7€14.9 million;

Ø

Pensionpension funds and other employee-related obligations in the amount of €9€35.8 million;

Ø

Shares carried by BVAGcollateral guarantees including an advance from the French State to SNCM in the amount of €27.4 million;Transportation Division (+€38.5 million).

Ø

Collateral guarantees intended to be used for Water Division investments in China in the amount of €45.4 million.


Other non-current financial assetsNo amounts were transferred to Assets of discontinued operationsclassified as held for sale in the amount of -€1.1 million in 2004. No amounts were transferred in 2005.2004, 2005 or 2006.


The classification of these financial assets in accordance with IAS 39 is as follows:


(€ million)

Available-for-sale
financial assets

Loans and receivables
originated by the company

Total

 

As of December 31, 2004

As of December 3
1, 2005

As of December
31, 2004

As of December
31, 2005

As of December
31, 2004

As of December
31, 2005

Other long-term loans, net

-

-

414.6

427.7

414.6

427.7

Other investments, net

186.9

252.1

  13.2

  12.7

200.1

264.8

Other long-term loans and investments, net

186.9

252.1

427.8

440.4

614.7

692.5



Note 12NOTE 12.


Deferred tax assets and liabilities


Movements in deferred tax assets and liabilities during 2005:2007:


(€ million)

As of December
31,2004

Changes in business

Fair value adjustments

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December
31, 2005

As of December 31, 2006

Changes in business through profit and loss

Changes in business through equity

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2007

Deferred tax assets, gross

1,787.6

167.3

(19.9)

186.2

(73.0)

(10.7)

2,037.5

Deferred tax assets not recognized

(431.9)

(140.4)

(10.3)

0.9

5.7

6.6

(569.4)

Deferred tax assets, net

1,122.6

(127.4)

38.2

32.7

68.0

(6.8)

1,127.3

1,355.7

26.9

(30.2)

187.1

(67.3)

(4.1)

1,468.1

Deferred tax liabilities, net

933.8

(16.4)

(8.5)

141.2

61.1

12.9

1,124.1

Deferred tax liabilities

1,504.9

30.7

5.8

328.7

(70.7)

(4.7)

1,794.7



As of December 31, 2007, the tax group in the United States has ordinary tax losses carried forward, relating to the restructuring in 2006 and associated with losses incurred by the former activities of U.S. Filter. These tax losses, which may exceed U.S.$ 4 billion,  are currently being reviewed by the U.S. tax authorities, at the request of the company, which considers the validity of these tax losses to be established, based on external appraisals. A deferred tax asset of U.S.$365 million (€248 million) is recognized in the balance sheet in respect of these tax losses as of December 31, 2007.

As a result of the new tax schedule, notably integrating flows relating to Thermal North America Inc., the Group recognized an additional deferred tax asset of €85 million during the year.

Conversely, the French tax group offset tax losses brought forward and previously capitalized.

Changes in business through equity mainly include the tax effect of fair value adjustments and actuarial gains and losses.

Changes in consolidation scope mainly concern the entry into the scope of consolidation of the BraunschweigSulo Group for the amount of €10.3€112 million in assets and €133.1€149 million in liabilities.liabilities, of Thermal North America Inc. for €20 million in assets and €44 million in liabilities and of VSA Tecnitalia for €27 million in liabilities and the impact of the fair value measurement of the Lanzhou and Haikou contracts for €27 million and €20 million in liabilities, respectively.

Foreign exchange translation losses are mainly due to the depreciation of the U.S. dollar and the pound sterling against the euro.



F-45



Back to Contents


Deferred tax assets and liabilitiesbreak down by natureas follows:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Deferred tax assets

   

Employee benefits

134.6

172.4

137.6

Impairment provisions

27.6

16.6

13.5

Tax losses

851.0

775.4

689.9

Finance leases / Assets

31.4

34.1

51.6

Temporary differences on provisions

310.5

255.5

175.4

Other deductible temporary differences

682.4(1)

533.6

524.7

Deferred tax assets, gross

2,037.5

1,787.6

1,592.7

Deferred tax assets not recognized

(569.4)

(431.9)

(458.0)

Recognized deferred tax assets

1,468.1

1,355.7

1,134.7

(1)

including DTA on concessions of €107 million, on fair value adjustments of €88 million and on financial instruments of €106 million.


(€ million)

As of December
31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Deferred tax liabilities

   

Deferred tax on amortization/depreciation differentials

662.0

553.6

540.6

Asset remeasurement

497.2

389.4

231.0

Finance leases / Liabilities

18.9

27.4

46.1

Other taxable temporary differences

616.6

534.5

387.3

Deferred tax liabilities

1,794.7

1,504.9

1,205.0


Deferred tax assets and liabilities break down by naturedestination as follows:


(€ million)

As of December
31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Deferred tax assets, net

   

Deferred tax assets on net income

1,400.5

1,276.7

970.3

Deferred tax assets on reserves

67.6

79.0

164.4

Deferred tax assets, net

1,468.1

1,355.7

1,134.7

Deferred tax liabilities

   

Deferred tax liabilities on net income

1,755.1

1,476.4

1,147.9

Deferred tax liabilities on reserves

39.6

28.5

57.1

Deferred tax liabilities

1,794.7

1,504.9

1,205.0




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-17F-46



Back to contentsContents





(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

Deferred tax assets

  

 Employee benefits

137.6

87.6

Write down

17.5

12.4

Tax losses

692.3

699.4

Finance leases / Assets

51.6

52.4

Temporary differences on provisions

168.3

168.5

 Other deductible temporary differences

517.0

487.6

Gross deferred tax assets

1,584.3

1,507.9

Deferred tax assets not recognized

(457.0)

(385.3)

Recognized deferred tax assets

1,127.3

1,122.6

Deferred tax liabilities:

  

Deferred tax on amortization differential

542.9

484.2

Asset remeasurement

152.3

126.8

Finance leases / Liabilities

45.9

34.8

 Other taxable temporary differences

383.0

288.0

Deferred tax liabilities

1,124.1

933.8



Deferred tax assets and liabilities break down by destinationon tax losses not recognized as of December 31, 2007 becomes time-barred as follows:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

Deferred tax assets, net

  

Deferred tax asset on net income

975.0

1,027.2

Deferred tax assets on reserves

152.3

95.4

Deferred tax assets

1,127.3

1,122.6

Deferred tax liabilities

  

Deferred tax liabilities on net income

1,074.0

860.0

Deferred tax liabilities on reserves

50.1

73.8

Deferred tax liabilities

1,124.1

933.8

(€ million)

Maturity

Total

≤ 5 years

 > 5 years

Unlimited

Gross tax losses

15.0

44.8

379.8

439.6


Recap: Movements in deferred tax assets and liabilities during 2006:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

Change in business through profit or loss

Changes in business through profit and loss

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2006

Deferred tax assets, gross

1,592.7

71.2

(14.2)

109.3

(24.4)

53.0

1,787.6

Deferred tax assets not recognized

(458.0)

11 .7

0.3

-

8.0

6.1

(431.9)

Deferred tax assets, net

1,134.7

82.9

(13.9)

109.3

(16.4)

59.1

1,355.7

Deferred tax liabilities

1,205.0

98.0

15.9

140.3

(13.2)

58.9

1,504.9


Note 13NOTE 13.


Working capital


Movements in net working capital during 2005:2007:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2004

Changes
in business

Impairment
losses

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2005

Inventories and work in progress, net

562.0

18.5

(1.9)

40.3

14.4

12.9

646.2

Net operating receivables

9,261.4

559.3

(25.6)

207.1

155.6

(45.5)

10,112.3

Net operating payables

9,576.0

522.4

-

165.9

150.7

(40.7)

10,374.3

Net working capital

247.4

55.4

(27.5)

81.5

19.3

8.1

384.2

(€ million)

As of

December 31, 2006

Changes in business

Impairment losses

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of

December 31, 2007

Inventories and work-in-progress, net

731.8

62.3

(1.5)

53.2

(8.7)

2.3

839.4

Operating receivables, net

10,968.7

1,115.9

(10.1)

514.6

(141.6)

11.9

12,459.4

Operating payables, net

11,268.6

1,135.8

-

568.8

(151.1)

122.7

12,944.8

Net working capital

431.9

42.4

(11.6)

(1.0)

0.8

(108.5)

354.0


AmountsNet working capital of €2.5 million was transferred to Assets of discontinued operationsclassified as held for sale (GMA/Sulo business in 2004 totaled €10.7 million. the Environmental Services Division), compared to €22.3 million (Danish transportation activities) in 2006.

No amounts were transferred in 2005.


Amounts transferred to Liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale in 2007. €20.2 million was reclassified in liabilities in 2006 (in respect of discontinued operations in 2004 totaled €4.5 million. No amounts were transferred in 2005.Danish transportation activities).


WorkingNet working capital includes “operating” working capital requirements of operations (inventories, trade receivables, andtrade payables and other operating receivables and payables) and tax, “tax” working capital requirements (current tax receivables and payables). Movements during the year of €55.4 million concern and “investment” working capital requirements(receivables and payables in respect of operationscapital expenditure). Changes in the amountbusiness net of €52.2impairment losses of €30.8 million andcomprise a movement of €167.1 million in operating working capital, of €22.9 million in tax working capital requirementsand of -€159.2 million in the amount of €3.2 million.investment working capital.



F-47



Back to Contents


Movements in inventories during 2005:2007:


Inventories(€ million)

As of December 31, 2004

Changes in business

Impairment losses

Reversal of impairment losses

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2005

Raw materials and supplies

330.0

0.6

-

-

33.6

10.7

6.9

381.8

Work in progress

190.9

15.6

-

-

1.8

1.6

5.9

215.8

Finished products inventories

61.3

(0.4)

-

-

5.3

1.9

0.7

68.8

Contracts in progress

6.5

2.7

-

-

-

0.6

-

9.8

Inventories and work in progress

588.7

18.5

-

-

40.7

14.8

13.5

676.2

Impairment losses on raw materials and supplies

(18.4)

-

(7.0)

5.4

0.4

(0.2)

(0.7)

(20.5)

Impairment losses on work in progress

(0.5)

-

(0.3)

0.3

(0.1)

-

0.1

(0.5)

Impairment losses on finished products inventories

(7.8)

-

(3.8)

3.5

(0.7)

(0.2)

-

(9.0)

Impairment losses on contracts in progress

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Impairment losses on inventories and work-in-progress

(26.7)

-

(11.1)

9.2

(0.4)

(0.4)

(0.6)

(30.0)

Inventories and work in progress, net

562.0

18.5

(11.1)

9.2

40.3

14.4

12.9

646.2





VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-18



Back to contents

Inventories


(€ million)

As of

December 31, 2006

Changes in business

Impairment losses

Reversals of impairment losses

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of

December 31, 2007

Raw materials and supplies

452.6

47.4

-

-

24.0

(5.4)

8.0

526.6

Work-in-progress

237.4

1.4

-

-

15.7

(2.1)

4.9

257.3

Other inventories

81.0

13.5

-

-

14.0

(1.4)

(10.4)

96.7

Inventories and work-in-progress, gross

771.0

62.3

-

-

53.7

(8.9)

2.5

880.6

Impairment losses on raw materials and supplies

(30.3)

-

(7.0)

4.7

(0.4)

0.1

(0.3)

(33.2)

Impairment losses on work-in-progress

(0.8)

-

(1.0)

0.4

-

-

-

(1.4)

Impairment losses on other inventories

(8.1)

-

(1.5)

2.9

(0.1)

0.1

0.1

(6.6)

Impairment losses on inventories and work-in-progress

(39.2)

-

(9.5)

8.0

(0.5)

0.2

(0.2)

(41.2)

Inventories and work-in-progress, net

731.8

62.3

(9.5)

8.0

53.2

(8.7)

2.3

839.4


Movements in operating receivables during 2005:2007:

Operating receivables


(€ million)

As of

December 31, 2006

Changes in business

Impairment losses (1)

Reversals of impairment losses  (1)

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of

December 31, 2007

Trade receivables

8,939.3

571.5

-

-

423.2

(114.7)

(5.6)

9,813.7

Impairment losses on trade receivables

(448.7)

-

(166.4)

126.5

(33.6)

9.2

3.0

(510.0)

Trade receivables, net (2)

8,490.6

571.5

(166.4)

126.5

389.6

(105.5)

(2.6)

9,303.7

Other operating receivables

1,383.9

75.3

-

-

93.6

(15.5)

(29.2)

1,508.1

Impairment losses on other operating receivables

(121.7)

-

(14.1)

43.9

1.5

0.2

15.1

(75.1)

Other operating receivables, net (2)

1,262.2

75.3

(14.1)

43.9

95.1

(15.3)

(14.1)

1,433.0

Other receivables (3)

390.6

122.5

-

-

15.6

(9.8)

11.7

530.6

Tax receivables

825.3

346.6

-

-

14.3

(11.0)

16.9

1,192.1

Operating receivables, net

10,968.7

1,115.9

(180.5)

170.4

514.6

(141.6)

11.9

12,459.4

(1) Impairment losses are recorded in operating income

(2) Financial assets as defined by IAS 39, valued in accordance with the rules applicable to loans and receivables.

(3) Receivables recognized on a percentage completion basis in respect of construction activities and prepayments.




F-48


Operating receivables(€ million)

As of December 31, 2004

Changes in business

Impairment losses

Reversal of impairment losses

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2005

Trade accounts receivable

7,659.2

672.6

-

-

194.0

140.9

(26.6)

8,640.1

Other operating accounts receivable

1,354.5

(96.6)

-

-

21.6

18.3

9.1

1,306.9

Tax receivables

716.6

(16.7)

-

-

9.0

5.7

(23.5)

691.1

Operating receivables (gross)

9,730.3

559.3

-

-

224.6

164.9

(41.0)

10,638.1

Impairment losses on trade accounts receivable

(367.2)

-

(129.0)

118.8

(17.3)

(8.9)

2.7

(400.9)

Impairment losses on other operating accounts receivable

(101.7)

-

(27.3)

11.9

(0.2)

(0.4)

(7.2)

(124.9)

Impairment losses on operating receivables

(468.9)

-

(156.3)

130.7

(17.5)

(9.3)

(4.5)

(525.8)

Operating receivables, net

9,261.4

559.3

(156.3)

130.7

207.1

155.6

(45.5)

10,112.3



Back to Contents


Operating receivables are treated as loans and receivables for accounting purposes. Short-term commercial receivables and payables without a declared interest rate are recognized at nominal value, unless discounting at the market rate has a material impact.


Changes in consolidation scope primarily concerned the following acquisitions:

Environmental Services: Sulo Group (Germany) for €206 million and VSA Tecnitalia, formerly TMT (Italy) for €127 million;

Energy Services: Thermal North America Inc. (United States) for €43 million;

Water: Thames Water subsidiaries (United Kingdom) for €35 million.

Foreign exchange translation losses are primarily due to the depreciation of the pound sterling and the U.S. dollar against the euro.

Securitization of receivables in France

The French securitization program is governed by an agreement signed in June 2002 for five years with a securitized debt fund. This agreement was renewed on May 31, 2007 for an additional 5 years. Veolia Environnement decided to renew this agreement and include 16 new transferor companies in the Water Division (France), bringing the number of transferor companies to 24 and total securitized receivables through its Water Division subsidiaries in the amountto €495.5 million.

Disposal of €413 million netreceivables

Disposal of discountreceivables (“cession de créances Dailly”) were nil as of December 31, 2005 (compared to €415 million as of December 31, 2004). As of December 31, 2005, the French securitization program is consolidated in the amount of €377 million in operating receivables.2007 and 2006.


Discounting of receivables

The Group discounted €115.2 million of receivables (Dailly sales and other) as of December 31, 2005 compared to €824.7 million as of December 31, 2004.

Discounted receivablesReceivables definitively sold to third parties and removed from the balance sheet in the Energy Services Division totaled €121€25.5 million as of December 31, 2005.2007, compared to €108 million as of December 31, 2006.


Movements in operating liabilitiespayables during 2005:2007:


Operating payables(€ million)

As of December 31, 2004

Changes in business

Changes in
consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2005

Trade accounts payable

4,760.0

546.3

73.4

82.2

(25.0)

5,436.9

Tax and employee-related accounts payable

4,816.0

(23.9)

92.5

68.5

(15.7)

4,937.4

Operating payables

(€ million)

As of December 31, 2006

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2007

Trade payables (1)

4,776.0

445.0

312.0

(56.1)

(133.1)

5,343.8

Other operating payables (2)

4,445.6

281.2

211.4

(55,4)

126.6

5,009.4

Other liabilities

988.3

133.4

18.0

(20,6)

65.2

1,184.3

Tax and employee-related liabilities

1,058.7

276.2

27.3

(19.0)

64.1

1,407.3

Operating payables

9,576.0

522.4

165.9

150.7

(40.7)

10,374.3

11,268.6

1,135.8

568.7

(151.1)

122.8

12,944.8

(1) Financial liabilities as defined by IAS 39, valued at amortized cost.

(2) Deferred income

(1) Financial liabilities as defined by IAS 39, valued at amortized cost.

(2) Deferred income



Note 14Trade payables are treated as liabilities at amortized cost in accordance with IAS 39 for accounting purposes. Short-term commercial payables without a declared interest rate are recognized at nominal value, unless discounting at the market rate has a material impact.


Changes in consolidation scope
primarily concerned the following acquisitions:

Short-term IFRIC 4 loans

Environmental Services: Sulo Group (Germany) for €176 million and VSA Tecnitalia, formerly TMT (Italy) for €107 million;

Energy Services: Thermal North America Inc. (United States) for €45 million;

Water: Thames Water subsidiaries (United Kingdom) for €64 million.




F-49



Back to Contents


Foreign exchange translation losses are primarily due to the depreciation of the pound sterling and the U.S. dollar against the euro.

Other movements primarily concern the reclassification of other long-term debts in working capital (primarily subscriber deposits and work funds, tax liabilities and liabilities on the acquisition of financial assets) of €152.3 million.


Recap: Movements in the net carrying amount of short-term IFRIC 4 loansworking capital during 2005:2006:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2004

Acquisitions

Repayments  / removals

Impairment losses

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2005

Gross

133.0

16.6

(7.4)

-

0.6

7.3

14.0

164.1

Impairment losses

-

-

-

(0.6)

-

-

-

(0.6)

Short-term IFRIC 4 loans, net

133.0

16.6

(7.4)

(0.6)

0.6

7.3

14.0

163.5


Short-term IFRIC 4 loans by division break down as follows:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

Water

52.9

36.6

Waste Management

1.6

0.2

Energy Services

109.0

96.2

Short-term IFRIC 4 loans, net

163.5

133.0


(€ million)

As of

December 31, 2005

Changes in business

Impairment losses

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of

December 31, 2006

Inventories and work-in-progress, net

635.2

77.2

(2.4)

36.8

(5.3)

(9.7)

731.8

Operating receivables, net

10,083.3

508.7

(33.3)

495.5

(55.8)

(29.7)

10,968.7

Operating payables, net

10,369.8

460.0

0.0

536.5

(54.1)

(43.6)

11,268.6

Net working capital

348.7

125.9

(35.7)

(4.2)

(7.0)

4.2

431.9


Note 15NOTE 14.


Other current financial assets

Movements in the value of other current financial assets during 2007:

(€ million)

As of

December 31, 2006

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Fair value adjustments (1)

Impairment losses (1)

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of

December 31, 2007

Gross

363.3

27.6

4.6

-

-

(1.5)

(219.9)

174.1

Impairment losses

(158.0)

-

(1.0)

-

(3.3)

0.1

140.9

(21.3)

Current financial assets in loans and receivables, net

205.3

27.6

3.6

-

(3.3)

(1.4)

(79.0)

152.8

Other current financial assets

66.4

90.9

37.6

(1.3)

0.1

(6.7)

(9.8)

177.2

Total Other current financial assets, net

271.7

118.5

41.2

(1.3)

(3.2)

(8.1)

(88.8)

330.0

(1)

Impairment losses are recorded in financial income and expenses.


Other short-term loans are treated as loans and receivables as defined by IAS 39 for accounting purposes.

Other financial assets are treated as available-for-sale assets for accounting purposes.

Other current financial assets as of December 31, 2007 primarily comprise the non-Group portion of loans and current accounts, the pre-financing of assets in the Transportation Division and the current part of an investment under escrow account with a view to the acquisition of Tianjin Shibei shares in China for €106.1 million.

Other movements primarily comprise the removal of loans and current accounts granted to proportionately consolidated companies (mainly in respect of the Berlin contract).



F-50



Back to Contents


Recap: Movements in the value of other short-term loanscurrent financial assets during 2005:2006:


(€ million)

As of December
31, 2004

Changes
in business

Changes in
consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December
31, 2005

As of

December 31, 2005

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Fair value adjustments (1)

Impairment losses (1)

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of

December 31,2006

Gross

496.0

(115.0)

20.0

4.2

(25.6)

379.6

379.5

(2.6)

5.4

-

-

(3.7)

(15.3)

363.3

Impairment losses

(163.0)

-

-

(0.3)

4.9

(158.4)

(158.3)

-

-

(1.2)

-

1.5

(158.0)

Other short-term loans, net

333.0

(115.0)

20.0

3.9

(20.7)

221.2

Current financial assets in loans and receivables, net

221.2

(2.6)

5.4

-

(1.2)

(3.7)

(13.8)

205.3

Current financial assets available for sale, net

60.7

(2.5)

1.4

1.5

-

(0.3)

5.6

66.4

Other current financial assets, net

281.9

(5.1)

6.8

1.5

(1.2)

(4.0)

(8.2)

271.7

(1)

Impairment losses are recorded in financial income and expenses.

(1)

Impairment losses are recorded in financial income and expenses.

The main

Net other short-term loans as of December 31, 2005 consist2006 primarily comprise the non-group portion of loans and current accounts granted to proportionately consolidated companies (mainly in respect of the Berlin contract for €69.8 million and in France in the Water Division for €66.4 million) and the pre-financing of investmentsassets in trains (Veoliathe Transportation Germany) for €36.8 million and various loans and non-group current accounts for €99 million (mainly Veolia Water Berlin for €66.8 million and Veolia Water FranceDivision for €17.7 million).million.


All short-term loans areNOTE 15.

Cash & Cash equivalents

Movements in cash and cash equivalents during 2007:


(€ million)

As of

December 31, 2006

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Fair value adjustments   (1)

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2007

Cash

1,263.8

97.3

114.9

-

(8.1)

(18.4)

1,449.5

Cash equivalents

1,394.2

333.8

20.4

(0.1)

(2.4)

(79.8)

1,666.1

Cash & cash equivalents

2,658.0

431.1

135.3

(0.1)

(10.5)

(98.2)

3,115.6

(1)

Fair value adjustments are recorded in financial income and expenses.

Cash and cash equivalents of €0.3 million were transferred to Assets classified as held for sale in “Loans and receivables originated2007, compared to €0.5 million in 2006.

Changes in consolidation scope mainly concern the acquisition of Sulo by the Company” asEnvironmental Services Division in Germany (+€26.1 million) and the acquisition of December 31, 2004the Thames Water subsidiaries (+€21.4 million) and 2005subsidiaries in accordance with IAS 39.Asia (+€45.3 million) by the Water Division.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-19F-51



Back to contentsContents



Note 16As of December 31, 2007, the Water Division held cash of €482.6 million, the Energy Services Division held cash of €294.8 million, the Environmental Services Division held cash of €247.8 million, the Transportation Division held cash of €129.7 million, Veolia Environnement SA held cash of €134.8 million and certain subsidiaries (primarily insurance) held cash of €159.8 million.


Marketable securities


Movements in marketable securities during 2005:


(€ million)

As of December
31, 2004

Changes
in business

Changes in
consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December
31, 2005

Gross

191.5

(117.4)

1.4

1.3

(14.6)

62.2

Impairment losses

(2.2)

-

-

-

0.7

(1.5)

Marketable securities net

189.3

(117.4)

1.4

1.3

(13.9)

60.7

The decrease in 2005 is related to the partial saleAs of theDecember 31, 2007, cash UCITS portfolioequivalents were primarily held by Veolia Environnement SA in the amount of €117.2 million.

No amounts were transferred to Assets€1,416.1 million (including cash mutual fund investments of discontinued operations in 2004 or 2005.

The change in the€515.8 million, treasury notes of €601.1 million and cash notes for €278.8 million). Cash flow statement includes capital gainsequivalents are accounted for as assets designated at fair value through profit and losses realized on the sale of marketable securities of €0.8 million as of December 31, 2005.loss.


The classification of these financial assets in accordance with IAS 39 is as follows:


(€ million)

Financial assets evaluated at fair value through the Income Statement

Available-for-sale financial assets  

Total

 

As of December
31, 2004

As of December
31, 2005

As of December
31, 2004

As of December
31, 2005

As of December
31, 2004

As of December
31, 2005

Marketable securities

117.2

-

72.1

60.7

189.3

60.7


In 2004, latent gains and losses recognized in equity and released to income amounted to €44 million and were related to the sale of Vinci shares. In 2005, no sale led to recognize latent gains end losses to income.



Note 17


Cash and cash equivalents


Recap: Movements in cash and cash equivalents during 2005:2006:


(€ million)

As of December
31, 2004

Changes in business

Changes in
consolidation scope

Fair value
adjustments

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December
31, 2005

As of

December 31, 2005

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Fair value adjustments     (1)

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of

December 31, 2006

Cash

948.4

64.4

107.4

-

55.9

(3.0)

1,173.1

1,173.1

(81.3)

196.5

-

(23.0)

(1.5)

1,263.8

Cash equivalents

3,711.9

(2,565.7)

31.6

1.3

(27.8)

11.7

1,163.0

1,163.0

222.2

5.0

0.4

0.4

3.2

1,394.2

Cash and cash equivalents

4,660.3

(2,501.3)

139.0

1.3

28.1

8.7

2,336.1

Cash & cash equivalents

2,336.1

140.9

201.5

0.4

(22 .6)

1.7

2,658.0

(1)

Fair value adjustments are recorded in financial income and expenses.

(1)

Fair value adjustments are recorded in financial income and expenses.

No amountsCash and cash equivalents of €0.5 million were transferred to Assets of discontinued operationsclassified as held for sale in 2004 or 2005.

The overall decrease in cash and cash equivalents in 2005 was mainly due to the sale of certificates of deposits in the amount of -€2,151 million and the sale of monetary UCITS in the amount of -€610 million, to finance the repayment of the OCEANE bonds on January 1, 2005 (€1,535 million), the redemption of the TSAR subordinated loan notes redeemable in preference shares on March 31, 2005 and Water Division investments (acquisition of Braunschweig on January 10, 2005 for €374 million).2006.

Changes in consolidation scope mainly concern the acquisition of the water services company serving the town of Braunschweig in GermanySNCM for €100.7 million in the amountTransportation Division, acquisitions in the Water Division for €40.8 million (in Germany and China) and acquisitions in the Environmental Services Division for €38.5 million (Belgium and the United Kingdom).

As of €45December 31, 2006, the Water Division held cash of €517.4 million, the Energy Services Division held cash of €219.1 million, the Environmental Services Division held cash of €214.4 million, the Transportation Division held cash of €141.8 million, Veolia Environnement SA held cash of €43.8 million and other head office entities held cash of €117.0 million.

As of December 31, 2005,2006, cash was held by the Water Division (€512 million, including €78 million by Braunschweig and €66 million by Shenzhen), the Energy Services Division (€153 million), the Waste Management Division (€141 million; unitary amounts of less than €20 million), the Transportation Division (€122 million, including €22 million by Melbourne), Veolia Environnement SA (€101 million) and other holding companies (€128 million, including €87 million by Codeve).

Monetary instrumentsequivalents were mainlyprimarily held by Veolia Environnement SA as of December 31, 2005 in the amount of €853€1,096.8 million (including €602cash mutual fund investments of €823.0 million of monetary UCITS, €166 million ofand treasury notes and €50 million of certificates of deposit)€208.3 million).

Cash and cash equivalents are classified under IAS 39 inaccounted for as assets recognizeddesignated at fair value through the Income statement.


profit and loss.

Note 18


Equity

F-52



Back to Contents


1.NOTE 16.

Equity


(€ million)

Number of shares outstanding

Share capital

Additional paid-in capital

Treasury shares

Consolidated reserves and retained earnings

Foreign exchange translation reserves

Fair value reserves

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

Minority interests

Total equity

As of January 1, 2005

406,421,983

2,032.1

6,467.6

(459.3)

(4,677.5)

(72.1)

(79.6)

3,211.2

1,728.7

4,939.9

Issues of share capital of the parent company

1,450,623

7.3

31.5

-

8.6

-

-

47.4

-

47.4

Elimination of treasury shares

 

-

-

6.6

2.6

-

-

9.2

-

9.2

Share purchase and subscription options

 

-

-

-

16.2

-

-

16.2

-

16.2

Third party share in share capital increases by subsidiaries and changes in consolidation scope

 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

80.0

80.0

Parent company dividend distribution

 

-

-

-

(265.4)

-

-

(265.4)

-

(265.4)

Third party share in dividend distributions by subsidiaries

 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(108.6)

(108.6)

Foreign exchange translation

 

-

-

-

-

284.4

-

284.4

33.6

318.0

Fair value adjustments

 

-

-

-

-

-

9.7

9.7

1.6

11.3

Actuarial gains or losses on pension obligations

 

-

-

-

(132.5)

-

-

(132.5)

(12.2)

(144.7)

Net income for the year

 

-

-

-

622.2

-

-

622.2

172.9

795.1

Other changes

 

-

-

-

(26.3)

-

14.1

(12.2)

(8.0)

(20.2)




F-53



Back to Contents



(€ million)

Number of shares outstanding

Share capital

Additional paid-in capital

Treasury shares

Consolidated reserves and retained earnings

Foreign exchange translation reserves

Fair value reserves

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

Minority interests

Total equity

As of December 31, 2005

407,872,606

2,039.4

6,499.1

(452.7)

(4,452.1)

212.3

(55.8)

3,790.2

1,888.0

5,678.2

Issues of share capital of the parent company

4,753,944

23.7

142.1

-

15.8

-

-

181.6

-

181.6

Elimination of treasury shares

 

-

-

(26.9)

25.8

-

-

(1.1)

-

(1.1)

Share purchase and subscription options

 

-

-

-

16.7

-

-

16.7

-

16.7

Third party share in share capital increases by subsidiaries and changes in consolidation scope

 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

158.8

158.8

Parent company dividend distribution

 

-

-

-

(336.3)

-

-

(336.3)

-

(336.3)

Third party share in dividend distributions by subsidiaries

 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(142.9)

(142.9)

Foreign exchange translation

 

-

-

-

-

(106.8)

0.5

(106.3)

6.2

(100.1)

Fair value adjustments

 

-

-

-

0.2

-

33.2

33.4

1.3

34.7

Actuarial gains or losses on pension obligations

 

-

-

-

26.4

-

-

26.4

(0.8)

25.6

Net income for the year

 

-

-

-

758.7

-

-

758.7

236.2

994.9

Other changes

 

-

-

-

(41.9)

39.1

0.3

(2.5)

45.8

43.3




F-54



Back to Contents



(€ million)

Number of shares outstanding

Share capital

Additional paid-in capital

Treasury shares

Consolidated reserves and retained earnings

Foreign exchange translation reserves

Fair value reserves

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

Minority interests

Total equity

As of December 31, 2006

412,626,550

2,063.1

6,641.2

(479.6)

(3 986.7)

144.6

(21.8)

4,360.8

2,192.6

6,553.4

           

Issues of share capital of the parent company

59,136,206

295.7

2,538.3

-

33.8

-

-

2 867.8

-

2,867.8

Elimination of treasury shares

 

-

-

18.9

(0.3)

-

-

18.6

-

18.6

Share purchase and subscription options

 

-

-

-

15.6

-

-

15.6

-

15.6

Third party share in share capital increases by subsidiaries and changes in consolidation scope

 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

178.5

178.5

Parent company dividend distribution

 

-

-

-

(419.7)

-

-

(419.7)

-

(419.7)

Third party share in dividend distributions by subsidiaries

 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(144.6)

(144.6)

Foreign exchange translation

 

-

-

-

-

(264.3)

-

(264.3)

15.4

(248.9)

Fair value adjustments

 

-

-

-

-

(8.1)

47.1

39.0

(0.8)

38.2

Actuarial gains or losses on pension obligations

 

-

-

-

79.5

-

-

79.5

8.5

88.0

Net income for the year

 

-

-

-

927.9

-

-

927.9

326.9

1,254.8

Other changes

 

-

-

-

(17.3)

8.7

(3.7)

(12.3)

1.3

(11.0)

As of December 31, 2007

471,762,756

2,358.8

9,179.5

(460.7)

(3 367.2)

(119.1)

21.6

7,612.9

2,577.8

10,190.7


The dividend distribution per share was €1.05, €0.85 and €0.68 in 2007, 2006 and 2005 respectively.


A dividend distribution of €1.21 per share is proposed to the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting of May 7, 2008.




F-55



Back to Contents


16.1

Share capital management objectives, policies and procedures

Veolia Environnement manages its share capital within the framework of a prudent and rigorous financial policy that seeks to ensure easy access to French and international capital markets, to enable investment in projects that create value and provide shareholders with a satisfactory remuneration.

This policy has led Veolia Environnement to define the following objectives:

(i) Net financial indebtedness / (EBITDA+ repayment of operating financial assets) of between 3.5 and 4

(ii) Dividend distribution rate of greater than 50% of recurring net income.

16.2

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent


1.116.2.1

Share capital

The share capital is fully paid up.

Share capital increases:

In 2004, Veolia Environnement carried out a share capital increase of €25.3 million, subscribed by members of the Group employee savings plan in France and abroad.increases

In 2005, Veolia Environnement carried out a share capital increase of €34.6 million, subscribed by members of the Group employee savings plan in France and abroad. The discount on the issue price was expensed in the amount of €8.6 million.

In addition, the share capital was increased by €4.2 million (including additional paid-in capital) following the exercise of share purchase and subscription options.

In 2006, the share capital was increased by €92.9 million (including additional paid-in capital) following the exercise of share purchase and subscription options and by €70.7 million (including additional paid-in capital) following a share capital increase reserved for employees (Group employee savings plan). The discount on the issue price was expensed in the amount of €15.8 million.

In addition, the share capital was increased by €2.2 million (including additional paid-in capital) following the exercise of share subscription warrants.

On July 10, 2007, Veolia Environnement performed a share capital increase for cash with retention of preferential subscription rights in the amount of €2,558.1 million (after offset of share capital increase costs of €23.3 million against additional paid-in capital).

In addition in 2007, Veolia Environnement performed a share capital increase of €156.2 million, subscribed by members of the Group employee savings plan in France and abroad. The discount on the issue price was expensed in the amount of €33.8 million.

Furthermore, the share capital was increased by €119.7 million (including additional paid-in capital) following the exercise of share purchase and subscription options.

Number of shares outstanding:outstanding

405,070,515406,421,983 shares were outstanding as of January 1, 2004, 406,421,983 as of December 31, 2004 and2005, 407,872,606 as of December 31, 2005, 412,626,550 as of December 31, 2006 and 471,762,756 as of December 31, 2007 (including treasury shares).


1.216.2.2

Offset of treasury shares against equity

In 2004, 516,899 treasury shares were sold as part of the Onyx Ireland minority interest buyout transaction.

As of December 31, 2004, the Group held 16,183,548 of its own shares.

In 2005, 193,306 shares with a net carrying amount of €9.2 million were sold as part of transactions reserved for employees.

As of December 31, 2005, the Group held 15,990,242 of its own shares.

In 2006, 3,424,934 shares were sold and a call sold covering 2,700,000 treasury shares was repurchased for a net carrying amount of €105.8 million as part of transactions reserved for employees. At the same time, Veolia Environnement purchased 2,689,000 treasury shares for a total consideration of €106.9 million and sold a call covering 1,400,000 shares. As of December 31, 2006, the Group held 15,254,308 of its own shares.

In 2007, 133,654 shares with a net carrying amount of €3.2 million were sold. As of December 31, 2007, the Group held 15,120,654 of its own shares.



F-56



Back to Contents


1.316.2.3

Share purchase and subscription options

In accordance with IFRS 2, an expense of €6.9 million in 2004 and €16.2 million in 2005, €16.7 million in 2006 and €15.6 million in 2007 was recognized in respect of share option plans granted to employees.




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-20



Back to contents


1.416.2.4

Appropriation of net income and dividend distribution

A dividend distribution of €265.4€419.7 million was paid in 20052006 out of 20042006 net income attributable to equity holders of the parent of €391.5€758.7 million. The residual balance of €126.1€339.0 million was transferred to Veolia Environnement consolidated reserves.


1.516.2.5

Foreign exchange translation reserves

Accumulated foreign exchange translation reserves were transferred onAs of January 1, 2004 to consolidated reserves, in accordance with the option adopted by the Group on first-time adoption of IFRS.

As of December 31, 2004,2005, foreign exchange translation adjustments attributable to equity holders of the parent (€-72.1(-€72.1 million) included €11.2 million relating to the reversal of foreign exchange translation adjustments, net of tax, on discontinued operations of the Water Division in the United States. Other movements totaled €-83.3-€83.3 million and mainly concerned the USU.S. dollar (€-75.6(-€75.6 million).

In 2005, positive translation differences of €276.1€284.4 million (portion attributable to equity holders of the parent) concerned the USU.S. dollar in the amount of €112.3€113.5 million.

Accumulated foreign exchange translation reserves as of December 31, 2005 are positive: €204€212.3 million (portion attributable to equity holders of the parent), including €47.9€49.1 million related to the USU.S. dollar and €41.7 million related to the Korean won.

In 2006, negative translation differences of €106.3 million (portion attributable to equity holders of the parent) concerned the U.S. dollar in the amount of €95.0 million.

Accumulated foreign exchange translation reserves as of December 31, 2006 are positive: €144.6 million (portion attributable to equity holders of the parent), including €32.6 million related to the Korean won, €60.4 million related to the pound sterling, €68.8 million related to the Czech crown and -€45.9 million related to the U.S. dollar.

In 2007, negative translation differences of €263.7 million (portion attributable to equity holders of the parent) concerned the U.S. dollar in the amount of €80.3 million, the pound sterling in the amount of €122.2 million and the Chinese yuan in the amount of €41.9 million.

Accumulated foreign exchange translation reserves as of December 31, 2007 are negative: -€119.1 million (portion attributable to equity holders of the parent), including -€126.2 million related to the U.S. dollar, -€61.8 million related to the pound sterling, +€80.7 million related to the Czech crown and -€46.0 million related to the Chinese yuan.

The marked drop in foreign exchange translation reserves reflects the ongoing appreciation of the euro against the currencies of the zones in which the Group operates (United States and China for the U.S. dollar and Chinese yuan and the United Kingdom for the pound sterling). This downturn has however been limited by the Group policy of securing borrowings in the local currency.




F-57



Back to Contents


Movements in Foreign exchange translation reserves (attributable to equity holders of the parent and minority interests):


(€ million)

Total

Attributable to equity holders of the parent

As of January 1, 2005

  

Exchange differences on translation of the financial statements of subsidiaries drawn up in a foreign currency

(40.0)

(51.0)

Exchange differences on the net financing of foreign investments

(21.2)

(21.1)

Opening translation reserves as of January 1, 2005

(61.2)

(72.1)

Movement during the year:

  

Exchange differences on translation of the financial statements of subsidiaries drawn up in a foreign currency

323.5

289.1

Exchange differences on the net financing of foreign investments

(13.8)

(13.0)

Movements during the year 2005

309.7

276.1

As of December 31, 2005

  

Exchange differences on translation of the financial statements of subsidiaries drawn up in a foreign currency

283.5

238.1

Exchange differences on the net financing of foreign investments

(35.0)

(34.1)

Closing translation reserves as of December 31, 2005

248.5

204.0

(€ million)

Total

Attributable to equity holders of the parent

Translation differences on the financial statements of subsidiaries drawn up in a foreign currency

291.6

246.4

Translation differences on net foreign investments

(35.0)

(34.1)

As of December 31, 2005

256.6

212.3

Translation differences on the financial statements of subsidiaries drawn up in a foreign currency

237.8

186.5

Translation differences on net foreign investments

(42.8)

(41.9)

As of December 31, 2006

195.0

144.6

Translation differences on the financial statements of subsidiaries drawn up in a foreign currency

(263.9)

(271.3)

Translation differences on net foreign investments

6.0

7.6

Movements in 2007

(257.9)

(263.7)

Translation differences on the financial statements of subsidiaries drawn up in a foreign currency

(26.1)

(84.8)

Translation differences on net foreign investments

(36.8)

(34.3)

As of December 31, 2007

(62.9)

(119.1)


Breakdown by currency of Foreign exchange translation reserves attributable to equity holders of the parent:


(€ million)

As of December 31,2004

Movement

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2006

Movement

As of December 31, 2007

U.S. Dollar

(64.4)

112.3

47.9

Pound Sterling

8.2

24.5

32.7

U.S. dollar

49.1

(45.9)

(80.3)

(126.2)

Czech crown

18.3

68.8

11.9

80.7

Pound sterling

33.1

60.4

(122.2)

(61.8)

Chinese yuan

(11.1)

37.2

26.1

28.3

(4.1)

(41.9)

(46.0)

Korean Won

6.0

36.5

42.5

Czech Crown

4.6

8.6

13.2

Canadian Dollar

(0.7)

10.7

10.0

Australian Dollar

(5.5)

12.3

6.8

Hong Kong dollar

1.8

8.2

8.1

16.3

Polish zloty

4.7

5.2

6.1

11.3

Korean won

41.7

32.6

(23.8)

8.8

Canadian dollar

10.0

1.9

5.8

7.7

Swedish krona

(5.0)

1.5

(7.1)

(5.6)

Romanian leu

4.9

13.9

(9.0)

4.9

Hungarian florint

2.1

3.4

(0.7)

2.7

Norwegian crown

2.0

(0.6)

3.0

2.4

Mexican peso

(1.4)

8.1

6.7

2.7

1.6

0.4

2.0

Swedish krona

1.6

(6.5)

(4.9)

Australian dollar

6.9

1.0

(1.7)

(0.7)

Egyptian pound

3.7

0.4

(1.0)

(0.6)

Other currencies

(9.4)

32.4

23.0

8.0

(3.7)

(11.3)

(15.0)

Total

(72.1)

276.1

204.0

212.3

144.6

(263.7)

(119.1)




F-58



Back to Contents


1.616.2.6

Fair value reserves

Fair value reserves, attributable to equity holders of the parent are negative in the amount of €65.7€79.6 million as of January 1, 2004, €79.6 million as of December 31, 2004 and2005, €55.8 million as of December 31, 2005.2005 and €21.8 million as of December 31, 2006 and positive in the amount of €21.6 million as of December 31, 2007.

As of December 31, 2005,2007, fair value reserves mainly include fair value adjustments to interest-rate derivatives hedging floating-rate borrowings (negative €58.8(-€14.3 million) and to a lesser extent, fair value adjustments to available-for-sale securities (€3.034.4 million).


(€ million)

 

Available- for-sale securities

Interest rate derivatives hedging cash flows

Total

Attributable to equity holders of the parent

As of December 31, 2005

3.0

(60.7)

(57.7)

(55.8)

Fair value adjustments

(2.3)

37.0

34.7

33.4

Other movements

-

0.6

0.6

0.6

As of December 31, 2006

0.7

(23.1)

(22.4)

(21.8)

Fair value adjustments

32 .5

13.9

46.4

47.1

Other movements

1.2

(5.1)

(3.9)

(3.7)

As of December 31, 2007

34.4

(14.3)

20.1

21.6

Amounts are presented net of tax.

Movements

No material amounts were released to the Income Statement in fair value reserves (attributable to equity holdersrespect of the parentinterest rate derivatives hedging cash flows and minority interests):


(€ million)

Total

Attributable to Equity holders of the parent

As of January 1, 2005

  

Value adjustments on available-for-sale assets

4.3

4.3

Derivative instruments – cash flow hedges

(87.5)

(83.9)

Opening fair value reserves as of January 1, 2005

(83.2)

(79.6)

Fair value adjustments:

  

Fair value adjustments on available-for-sale assets

(2.4)

(2.4)

Derivative instruments – cash flow hedges

13.7

12.1

Fair value adjustments during the year 2005

11.3

9.7

Other adjustments:

  

Value adjustments on available-for-sale assets

1.1

1.1

Derivative instruments – cash flow hedges

13.1

13.0

Other adjustments during the year 2005

14.2

14.1

As of December 31, 2005

  

Value adjustments on available-for-sale assets

3.0

3.0

Derivative instruments – cash flow hedges

(60.7)

(58.8)

Closing fair value reserves as of December 31, 2005

(57.7)

(55.8)


1.7

Other adjustments

In 2004, other adjustments include mainly the impact of the consolidation of Berlin Water special purpose entities for €6.2 million.

In 2005, other adjustments include the exercise of a put optionrecorded in the amount of €12.7 million.finance costs and income




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-21



Back to contents


1.8

Reserves of associates

Associates account for €7.3 million of the Group's consolidated reserves as of December 31, 2005 including reserves of €8.7 million related to Tiru.


2.16.3

Minority interests


A break down of the movement in minority interests is presented in the Statement of changes in shareholders' equity.


The increase in minority interests in 20052007 was mainly due to the consolidation of Chinese companies in the company holdingWater Division (+€86.4 million) and the contractacquisition of Braunschweig (+€94 million). Other movements mainly concern the recognition of the put options held by minority interests by the ERBD in Central and Eastern Europe in the Dalkia Polish subsidiaries (-Water Division (+36.590 million).



F-59



Back to Contents


3.

Comprehensive income


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

Foreign exchange translation reserves

  

-

exchange differences on translation of the financial statements of subsidiaries drawn up in a foreign currency

323.5

(40.0)

-

exchange differences on the net financing of foreign investments

(13.8)

(21.2)

Foreign exchange translation reserves

309.7

(61.2)

Fair value adjustments

  

-

fair value adjustments on available-for-sale assets

(2.4)

(25.7)

-

derivative instruments – cash flow hedges

13.7

1.9

Fair value adjustments

11.3

(23.8)

Other value adjustments recognized in equity

  

-

actuarial gains or losses on pension obligations

(144.7)

-

Other value adjustments recognized in equity

(144.7)

-

Total value adjustments recognized directly in equity

176.3

(85.0)

Net income for the year

802.0

529.0

Total income and expenses recognized in net income or equity

978.3

444.0

-

Attributable to equity holders of the parent

776.3

305.5

-

Attributable to minority interests

202.0

138.5



Note 19NOTE 17.


Non-current provisions and other debt and current provisions


Pursuant to IAS 37 (see Note 1.13), provisions maturing after more than one year are discounted. Discount rates as of December 31, 2004 and 2005used were as follows:


Discount rates


As of December 31,2005

As of December 31,2004

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Euro

 

 

  

2 to 5 years

3.25%

3.23%

5.27%

4.37%

3.25%

6 to 10 years

3.88%

4.79%

5.52%

4.60%

3.88%

After ten years

4.32%

5.16%

6.04%

5.20%

4.32%

U.S. Dollar

    

2 to 5 years

5.16%

2.84%

4.35%

5.20%

5.16%

6 to 10 years

5.55%

4.79%

4.94%

5.36%

5.55%

After ten years

5.79%

5.16%

5.84%

5.86%

5.79%

Pound Sterling

    

2 to 5 years

4.88%

5.42%

5.51%

5.60%

4.88%

6 to 10 years

5.11%

5.67%

5.66%

5.56%

5.11%

After ten years

5.10%

5.67%

5.88%

5.60%

5.10%


Movements in non-current provisions in 2005:


(€ million)

As of December 31,2004

Charged to expenses

Utilization

Actuarial gains (losses)

Reversal

Unwinding of discount

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,2005

Litigation including employee-related and tax

82.7

45.1

(9.7)

-

(0.4)

1.8

4.9

1.5

(8.2)

117.7

Maintenance and repair costs accrued in advance

324.8

69.4

(94.2)

-

(8.0)

-

3.1

1.0

(3.1)

293.0

Provision for work in progress & losses to completion on LT contracts

45.1

15.4

(6.0)

-

(0.3)

0.5

5.1

1.3

(13.4)

47.7

Closure and post-closure costs

262.0

22.6

(4.3)

-

(0.3)

14.2

4.0

12.3

(4.2)

306.3

Restructuring costs

1.7

-

-

-

(0.3)

-

-

-

(1.4)

-

Subsidiary risks

3.7

0.2

(2.7)

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.2

Warranties and customer care

86.5

38.5

(6.0)

-

(0.2)

0.1

(0.2)

0.3

(4.4)

114.6

Other

63.8

26.8

(11.3)

-

(5.7)

2.6

6.1

1.6

10.1

94.0

Non-current provisions excl. pensions and other employee benefits

870.3

218.0

(134.2)

-

(15.2)

19.2

23.0

18.0

(24.6)

974.5

Non-current provisions for pensions and other employee benefits *

413.2

48.1

(34.8)

184.2

(34.2)

-

33.7

4.6

24.3

639.1

Non-current provisions

1,283.5

266.1

(169.0)

184.2

(49.4)

19.2

56.7

22.6

(0.3)

1,613.6

* See note 35.




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-22F-60



Back to contentsContents


Movements innon-current provisions and other debt during 2007:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2006

Addition / charge

Repayment / Utilization during the year

Reversal

Actuarial gains (losses)

Unwinding of discount

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Non-current / current reclassification

Other

As of

December 31, 2007

Tax litigations

65.3

34.2

(20.3)

(1.5)

-

0.7

5.8

(0.1)

(1.9)

13.5

95.7

Employee litigations

3.2

3.8

(4.4)

(0.1)

-

-

0.1

-

-

7.7

10.3

Other litigations

94.5

19.5

(17.2)

(10.9)

-

2.0

0.5

(1.2)

(9.5)

1.0

78.7

Contractual commitments

287.8

164.6

(184.5)

(3.7)

-

-

0.8

-

-

3.1

268.1

Provisions for work-in-progress & losses to completion on LT contracts

312.6

36.4

(19.9)

(2.3)

-

14.7

(11.0)

(1.2)

(51.9)

(1.0)

276.4

Closure and post-closure costs

398.3

8.5

(14.0)

(4.8)

-

40.4

84.2

(20.4)

(15.1)

62.5

539.6

Restructuring provisions

23.2

0.1

(0.2)

(0.2)

-

-

(17.0)

-

(5.7)

1.1

1.3

Self-insurance provisions

131.1

39.6

(36.8)

-

-

1.6

(0.5)

(3.6)

(5.0)

7.4

133.8

Other

131.6

37.8

(15.7)

(21.8)

-

2.1

2.6

(2.0)

(7.8)

(37.6)

89.2

Non-current provisions excl. pensions and other employee benefits

1,447.6

344.5

(313.0)

(45.3)

-

61.5

65.5

(28.5)

(96.9)

57.7

1,493.1

Provisions for pensions and other employee benefits*

749.0

66.6

(89.5)

(6.2)

(122.7)

18.2

22.1

(10.7)

-

19.1

645.8

Non-current provisions

2,196.6

411.1

(402.5)

(51.5)

(122.7)

79.7

87.6

(39.2)

(96.9)

76.8

2,138.9

Other non-current debt

207.3

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(207.3)(1)

-

-

Non-current provisions and other debt

2,403.9

411.1

(402.5)

(51.5)

(122.7)

79.7

87.6

(39.2)

(304.2)

76.8

2,138.9

(1) Other non-current liabilities were primarily reclassified in working capital.

* See Note 32.





F-61



Back to Contents


Movements incurrent provisions during 2005:2007:


(€ million)

As of December 31,2004

Charged to expenses

Utilization

Reversal

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,2005

Litigation including employee-related and tax

193.3

112.2

(92.5)

(14.2)

0.8

4.0

3.4

207.0

Provision for work in progress & losses to completion on LT contracts

107.6

60.0

(92.1)

(0.3)

14.2

2.0

19.9

111.3

Provisions for property, plant and equipment

8.2

0.4

0.9

(1.4)

1.4

0.1

(8.1)

1.5

Closure and post-closure costs

72.4

5.1

(28.3)

(4.3)

(1.5)

4.1

5.9

53.4

Restructuring costs

35.9

6.5

(23.8)

(1.8)

2.0

1.3

1.7

21.8

Subsidiary risks

62.6

11.8

(49.6)

(6.1)

-

0.2

-

18.9

Warranties and customer care

90.1

67.8

(55.8)

(0.5)

24.8

8.4

10.2

145.0

Other

125.1

110.1

(58.9)

(12.0)

4.6

4.6

14.8

188.3

Current provisions excl. pensions and other employee benefits

695.2

373.9

(400.1)

(40.6)

46.3

24.7

47.8

747.2

Current provisions for pensions and other employee benefits *

27.8

17.4

(24.6)

(2.6)

3.7

5.2

(0.3)

26.6

Current provisions

723.0

391.3

(424.7)

(43.2)

50.0

29.9

47.5

773.8

* See note 35.

(€ million)

As of December 31, 2006

Charge

Utilization

Reversal

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Non-current / current reclassification

Other

As of

December 31, 2007

Tax litigations

48.6

43.2

(15.9)

(4.4)

13.9

(0.4)

1.9

1.0

88.0

Employee litigations

23.5

15.1

(6.0)

(3.2)

0.1

(0.1)

-

(0.7)

28.7

Other litigations

103.9

54.7

(26.0)

(30.1)

4.1

(2.2)

9.5

11.6

125.5

Provisions for work-in-progress & losses to completion on LT contracts

221.6

72.2

(149.5)

(7.7)

13.8

(3.3)

51.9

(9.2)

189.8

Closure and post-closure costs

64.1

7.8

(24.7)

(0.4)

3.1

(3.0)

15.1

3.9

65.9

Restructuring provisions

46.1

13.7

(11.9)

(2.4)

(17.8)

(0.4)

5.7

(1.0)

32.0

Self-insurance provisions

83.1

53.8

(38.6)

(1.1)

-

(3.7)

5.0

1.9

100.4

Other

235.0

98.6

(71.4)

(29.3)

2.1

(1,3)

7.8

(46.1)

195.4

Current provisions

825.9

359.1

(344.0)

(78.6)

19.3

(14.4)

96.9

(38.5)

825.7


The majority of other movements comprised reclassifications between different provision lines in order to improve presentation. The negative movement of €38.5 million primarily concerns amounts reclassified in non-current provisions relating to pensions and other employee benefits.

Provisions of €1.9 million were classified as held for sale in 2007. No amounts were transferred to Liabilities of discontinued operationsclassified as held for sale in 20042006 or 2005.

Movements in non-current and current provisions break down as follows:


Litigation

This provision covers all losses that are considered probable and that relate to litigation arising in the normal course of Veolia Environnement’s business operations.

The Water, Environmental Services and Energy ServiceServices Divisions account for the majority of the provisionprovisions (€201.5269.1 million, €60.6 million and €80.5€59.5 million respectively).


Maintenance and repair costs accrued in advanceContractual commitments

As part of its obligations under public services contracts, the Group assumes responsibility for the maintenance and repair of installations of the publicly-owned utility networks it manages. The resulting maintenance and repair costs are analyzed in accordance with IAS 37 on provisions and, where necessary, a provision for maintenance and repair costscontractual commitments is recorded. Maintenancerecorded where there is outstanding work to be performed. These provisions relate to the Water Division for €169.1 million, while repair provisions related to theand Energy Services Division for €123.5 million.Divisions in the amount of €181.0 million and €87.0 million respectively.


Work in progressWork-in-progress and losses to completion on long-term contracts

The principal provisions relate to engineering activitiesAs of December 31, 2007, these commitments mainly concerned the Water Division (€102.179.6 million), the Environmental Services Division (€88.6 million) and the Transportation Division (€29.0218.1 million). Changes in the consolidation scope mainly concern the entry into the scope of consolidation of Weir Techna in the Water DivisionVSA Tecnitalia for €9.4€28.5 million and the Sulo Group for €25.9 million and the fair value remeasurement of Helgelandskethe SNCM provision in the Transportation Division for €1.9-€79.5 million. Reversals of provisions mainly concern the SNCM contract for -€55.6 million and a railway contract in the Transportation Division in Germany for -€16.8 million.

These provisions include construction contracts and certain solutions and equipment sales (customer service) activities.



F-62



Back to Contents


Closure and post-closure costs

The Group has financial obligations relating to closure and post-closure costs at the remediation offor the disposal facilities it operates or for which it is otherwise responsible. The Group provides for these estimated future costs pro rata to waste tonnage hidden,deposited, over the authorized duration of the sites.

For the Waste Management Division, theseThese provisions totaled €335.4€452.7 million as of December 31, 2005,in 2007 compared to €308.9€428.5 million as of December 31, 2004.in 2006 in the Environmental Services Division and €51.5 million in 2007 compared to €10.7 million in 2006 in the Energy Services Division. The increase in these provisions for site restorationis mainly due to new commitments, the unwinding of the discount, and the change in the discount rates, impacted non-current provisions by €32.2 millions, €13.6rate and foreign exchange translation losses in the Environmental Services Division in the amount of €21.7 million, €19.5 million and -€5.718.7 million respectively.respectively and the entry into the scope of consolidation of Pannon Power for €31.6 million in the Energy Services Division.

Other provisions concern waste storage facilities in the Environmental Services Division in the amount of €64.8 million in 2007 compared to €3.8 million in 2006 and plant dismantling and site remediation in the Water, and Energy Services and Environmental Services Divisions in the amount of €18.2 million in 2007 compared to €5.3 million in 2006. Changes in consolidation scope concern the fair value remeasurement of Cleanaway provisions in the amount of €13.3 million

Self-insurance provisions

Self-insurance provisions mainly consist of amounts recorded in the Warranties and totaled €21.9 million and €21.2 million ascustomer care line in 2006. As of December 31, 20052007, such provisions total €234.3 million and 2004 respectively.


Subsidiary risks

Inwere mainly recorded by Group insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries in the normal courseamount of its activities, Veolia Environnement is required to record provisions to cover risks relating to certain subsidiaries.


Warranties and customer care

These provisions principally relate to captive insurance companies (€89.9€115.1 million, of incurred losses), to the Water Division (€66.4 million) and to the Energy Services Division (€46.2 million).


in the amount of €45.7 million and the Transportation Division in the amount of €35.1 million.

Other

Other provisions include thosevarious obligations recorded as part of the normal operation of the Group’sGroup's subsidiaries.


Pensions and other employee benefits

Provisions for pensions and other employee benefits as of December 31, 20052007 total €665.7€645.8 million, and include provisions for pensions and other post-employment benefits of €577.6€486.3 million (governed by IAS 19 and detailed in Note 34) and provisions for other long-term benefits of €88.1 million (see note 35).€159.5 million.




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-23F-63



Back to contentsContents



Note 20


Long-term borrowingsRecap: Movements innon-current provisions and other debt during 2006:


Long-term borrowings


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2004

Increases / subscriptions

Repayments

Changes in consolidation scope

Fair value adjustments

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of
December
31, 2005

Bonds

6,752.1

2,633.4

(1,506.7)

 

(119.4)

124.8

(26.3)

7,857.9

Other long-term borrowings

5,404.9

553.2

(771.3)

92.5

(0.7)

106.6

479.7

5,864.9

Long-term borrowings

12,157.0

3,186.6

(2,278.0)

92.5

(120.1)

231.4

453.4

13,722.8

(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

Addition / charge

Repayment / Utilization

Reversal

Actuarial gains (losses)

Unwinding of discount

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2006

Tax litigations

50.9

23.0

(7.3)

-

-

(0.5)

-

-

(0.8)

65.3

Employee litigations

2.2

1.5

(1.0)

(0.1)

-

0.2

-

-

0.4

3.2

Other litigations

64.6

27.1

(13.7)

(3.0)

-

0.2

13.3

(0.6)

6.6

94.5

Contractual commitments

295.8

163.7

(163.6)

(1.1)

-

-

0.2

-

(7.2)

287.8

Provisions for work-in-progress & losses to completion on LT contracts

47.7

68.6

(3.0)

(1.0)

-

(0.1)

206.2

(0.9)

(15.9)

301.6

Closure and post-closure costs

306.3

12.5

(13.6)

(13.8)

-

16.0

84.2

(5.3)

11.5

397.8

Restructuring provisions

-

-

-

-

-

-

23.2

-

-

23.2

Subsidiary risks

1.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(0.3)

0.9

Warranties and customer care

114.6

49.4

(20.9)

(2.4)

-

-

1.8

(1.2)

0.8

142.1

Other

99.0

25.0

(13.9)

(4.2)

-

0.6

42.0

(0.6)

(16.7)

131.2

Non-current provisions excl. pensions and other employee benefits

982.3

370.8

(237.0)

(25.6)

-

16.4

370.9

(8.6)

(21.6)

1,447.6

Non-current provisions for pensions and other employee benefits*

665.7

74.8

(83.2)

(2.7)

(37.1)

-

108.1

(0.8)

24.2

749.0

Non-current provisions

1,648.0

445.6

(320.2)

(28.3)

(37.1)

16.4

479.0

(9.4)

2.6

2,196.6

Other non-current debt

203.7

21.2

(14.2)

-

-

-

1.6

(3.4)

(1.6)

207.3

Non-current provisions and other debt

1,851.7

466.8

(334.4)

(28.3)

(37.1)

16.4

480.6

(12.8)

1.0

2,403.9

* See Note 32.



Long-term

F-64



Back to Contents


Recap:

Movements in current provisions during 2006:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

Charge

Utilization

Reversal

Change in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2006

Tax litigations

46.5

23.4

(18.4)

(2.6)

0.1

(0.1)

(0.3)

48.6

Employee litigations

18.4

12.3

(6.5)

(1.8)

(0.3)

-

1.4

23.5

Other litigations

142.1

39.1

(58.1)

(14.8)

-

(0.8)

(3.6)

103.9

Provisions for work-in-progress & losses to completion on LT contracts

111.3

55.6

(92.1)

(3.4)

67.1

(1.7)

28.4

165.2

Provisions for property. plant and equipment

1.5

2.5

(1.5)

-

-

-

-

2.5

Closure and post-closure costs

53.4

7.1

(17.1)

(2.7)

2.8

(2.6)

19.0

59.9

Restructuring provisions

21.8

15.6

(18.8)

(1.9)

29.9

-

(0.5)

46.1

Subsidiary risks

18.9

3.0

(5.0)

(1.3)

(0.5)

-

0.4

15.5

Warranties and customer care

145.0

60.5

(50.8)

(6.6)

0.5

(5.7)

(3.4)

139.5

Other

195.1

117.9

(86.0)

(34.9)

8.5

(1.8)

22.4

221.2

Current provisions

754.0

337.0

(354.3)

(70.0)

108.1

(12.7)

63.8

825.9


NOTE 18.

Non current borrowings

Movements innon current borrowings during2007:


(€ million)

As of

December 31, 2006

Increases / subscriptions

Repayments

Changes in consolidation scope

Fair value adjustments  (1)

Foreign exchange translation

Non-current / current reclassification

Other

As of December 31, 2007

Bonds

8,417.5

1,712.6

(1.3)

86.4

(47.0)

(112.9)

(1,050.5)

4.8

9,009.6

Other non current borrowings

5,584.1

486.7

(1,361.6)

1,564.6

8.8

(51.5)

(1,046.9)

(245.8)

4,938.4

Long-term borrowings

14,001.6

2,199.3

(1,362.9)

1,651.0

(38.2)

(164.4)

(2,097.4)

(241.0)

13,948.0

(1) Fair value adjustments are recorded in financial income and expenses.

Non current borrowings are recorded as financial liabilities at amortized cost for accounting purposes.

Changes in consolidation scope mainly concern the Environmental Services Division for €1,331.0 million (acquisition of the Sulo Group for €1,120.1 million and VSA Tecnitalia for €204.7 million), the Water Division for €165.8 million (acquisition of Thames Water for €150.5 million) and the Transportation Division for €83.2 million (fair value remeasurement of SNCM for €62 million).



F-65



Back to Contents


Other movements concern the reclassification of current accounts of proportionately consolidated companies.

No amounts were transferred to liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale in 2007. A net amount of €31.0 million was transferred to liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale in 2006.


Non current bond issues break down by maturity as follows:


(€ million)

As of December
31, 2004

As of December
31, 2005

Maturity

 

1 to 2 years

2 to 5 years

After five years

Veolia Environnement SA:

     

Publicly offered or traded issuances (a)

5,538.7

6,939.0

500.4

796.8

5,641.8

Private placements (b)

309.5

344.0

-

-

344.0

Subordinated securities (c)

298.0

-

-

-

-

Water

     

Three Valleys bond issue (d)

280.6

286.0

-

-

286.0

Waste Management

     

Montgomery bond issue (e)

71.8

74.8

9.2

28.5

37.1

Tyseley bond issue(f)

66.0

62.5

4.9

23.8

33.8

Other < €60 million

187.5

151.6

36.3

34.7

80.6

Long-term borrowings

6,752.1

7,857.9

550.8

883.8

6,423.3


(a)

As of December 31, 2005, bonds issued under the European Medium Term Notes (EMTN) program totaled €6,959.1 million (including €6,939.0 million maturing in more than one year). The impact of the fair value measurement of long-term borrowings was €114.0 million.


During 2005, Veolia Environnement issued notes under its EMTN program for a euro equivalent of €2,642.4 million (recognized in the balance sheet at amortized cost of €2,629.1 million), which break down as follows:

-

€600 million indexed to European inflation, maturing June 17, 2015 and bearing interest of 1.75% plus the European inflation rate excluding tobacco. The amortized cost as of December 31, 2005 is €603.3 million.

-

US$ 50 million, maturing June 30, 2015 and bearing interest of 4.685%. The amortized cost as of December 31, 2005 is €40.0 million.

-

€500 million at floating rates (3-month Euribor + 0.07%), maturing May 30, 2007. The amortized cost as of December 31, 2005 is €500.4 million.

-

€900 million at a fixed rate of 4%, maturing February 12, 2016. The amortized cost as of December 31, 2005 is €893.5 million.

-

€600 million at a fixed rate of 4.375%, maturing December 11, 2020. The amortized cost as of December 31, 2005 is €591.9 million.

In addition, on December 12, 2005, Veolia Environnement performed a partial repurchase of the June 2008 bond issue in the amount of €1.15 billion (initial issue of €2.0 billion, €1.85 billion of which remained outstanding after the partial repurchase at the beginning of 2004). The nominal amount repayable on June 27, 2008 post-repurchase is €700 million.

(b)

As of December 31, 2005, €344.0 million (including negative €0.8 million related to remeasurements) remained outstanding on the private placement performed in the United States (USPP). This bond issue comprises five tranches:

-

Tranches A, B and C, maturing January 30, 2013, of €33 million (fixed-rate interest of 5.84%), £7 million (fixed-rate interest of 6.22%) and US$147 million (fixed-rate interest of 5.78%) respectively;

-

Tranche D, maturing January 30, 2015, of US$125 million, bearing fixed-rate interest of 6.02%;

-

Tranche E, maturing January 30, 2018, of US$85 million, bearing fixed-rate interest of 6.31%.

Within the context of IFRS transition, Veolia Environnement launched the renegotiation of certain covenants included in the USPP documentation in order to adapt the definitions and thresholds of financial ratios.

(c)

Subordinated loan notes redeemable in preference shares (TSAR) issued on December 28, 2001 by the subsidiary VEFO and maturing December 28, 2006 in the amount of €300 million were repurchased on March 31, 2005.

(d)

The €200 million bond issue performed by the Water Division subsidiary, Three Valleys, in July 2004 bearing interest of 5.875%, was recognized as of December 31, 2005 at amortized cost for a euro equivalent of €286 million. This bond matures on July 13, 2026.

(e)

The US Dollar bond issue, bearing interest of 5.0%, was performed to finance the Montgomery plant near Philadelphia (Pennsylvania) in the United States. This redeemable loan was recognized as of December 31, 2005 at amortized cost for a euro equivalent of €74.8 million, and the final repayment is due on January 11, 2014.

(f)

This pound sterling bond issue, bearing interest of 6.6675%, was performed to refinance the incineration plant in Birmingham (UK). This redeemable loan was recognized as of December 31, 2005 at amortized cost for a euro equivalent of €62.5 million, and the final repayment is due on July 30, 2018.

(€ million)



As of

December 31, 2005

As of

December 31, 2006

As of

December 31,

2007

Maturity

< 3 years

3 to 5 years

> 5 years

Publicly offered or traded issuances(a)

6,939.0

7,588.6

8,191.1

65.5

966.5

7,159.1

Private placements (b)

344.0

309.1

288.8

-

-

288.8

Three Valleys bond issue (c)

286.0

292.1

267.6

-

-

267.6

Stirling Water Seafield Finance bond issue (d)

-

-

59.3

5.1

7.0

47.2

Other amounts < €50 million in 2007

288.9

227.7

202.8

51.7

47.0

104.1

Bonds

7,857.9

8,417.5

9,009.6

122.3

1,020.5

7,866.8

(a)

As of December 31, 2007, bonds issued under the European Medium Term Notes (EMTN) Program totaled €9,393.0 million, including €8,191.1 million maturing in more than one year. The impact of the fair value measurement of non current borrowings was -€105.2 million.

During 2007, Veolia Environnement issued notes under its EMTN program for a euro equivalent of €1,881.8 million (recognized in the balance sheet at amortized cost of €1,855.2 million), which break down as follows:

- €200 million at floating rates (3-month Euribor+0.50%), maturing August 2008. The amortized cost of the issue as of December 31, 2007 is €200.1 million. Given its maturity, this bond issue is recorded in short-term borrowings.

- €1 billion at a fixed-rate of 5.125%, maturing May 2022. The amortized cost of the issue as of December 31, 2007 is €987.8 million.

- £500 million at a fixed-rate of 6.125%, maturing October 2037. The amortized cost of the issue as of December 31, 2007 is €667.0 million.

In addition, Veolia Environnement redeemed two bond issues in 2007: a €491 million bond issue performed in November 2005 on May 30, 2007 and a €142 million bond issue performed in January 2006 on July 18, 2007.  Given their maturities, these bond issues were classified in current borrowings as of December 31, 2006.

Finally, two bond issues were transferred to current borrowings given their maturity:

- a €300 million bond issue maturing February 15, 2008,

- the residual balance on a €700 million bond issue maturing June 27, 2008.

(b)

As of December 31, 2007, €288.8 million (including €4.4 million related to remeasurements) remained outstanding on the private placement performed in the United States in 2003 (USPP). This bond issue comprises five tranches:

-

Tranches A, B and C, maturing January 30, 2013, of €33 million (fixed-rate interest of 5.84%), £7 million (fixed-rate interest of 6.22%) and US$147 million (fixed-rate interest of 5.78%) respectively

-

Tranche D, maturing January 30, 2015, of US$125 million, bearing fixed-rate interest of 6.02%

-

Tranche E, maturing January 30, 2018, of US$85 million, bearing fixed-rate interest of 6.31%

(c)

The €200 million bond issue performed by Three Valleys in the U.K. (Water Division subsidiary) in July 2004, bearing interest of 5.875%, is recognized as of December 31, 2007 at amortized cost for a euro equivalent of €267.6 million. This bond matures on July 13, 2026.

(d)

The €108.9 million redeemable bond issue performed in 1999 by Stirling Water Seafield Finance (Thames Water subsidiary) bearing interest of 5.822%, is recognized as of December 31, 2007 at amortized cost for a euro equivalent of €59.3 million (Stirling Water is proportionately consolidated in the amount of 49%). This bond matures on September 26, 2026.




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-24F-66



Back to contentsContents



Break downBreakdown of long-term bond issues by main component:


Operation(€ million)

Final maturity

Currency

Nominal  in  € million

Interest rate

Amortized cost restatement *

Revaluation

Net carrying amount

Effective interest rate before hedging

Effective interest rate after hedging

Series 1

06/27/2008

EUR

700

5.88%

(3)

34

731

6.09%

3.38%

Series 7

02/01/2012

EUR

1,000

5.88%

(7)

-

993

6.02%

6.02%

Series 8

04/29/2009

CSK

14

Pribor 3M + 0.67%

-

-

14

2.66%

2.66%

Series 8 a

04/29/2009

CSK

9

Pribor 3M + 0.67%

-

-

9

2.98%

2.98%

Series 9

04/23/2010

CSK

21

Pribor 3M + 0.67%

-

-

21

3.07%

3.07%

Series 10

05/28/2013

EUR

1,000

4.88%

(8)

41

1,033

5.00%

3.48%

Series 11

05/28/2018

EUR

750

5.38%

2

40

792

5.35%

4.18%

Series 12

11/25/2033

EUR

700

6.12%

(6)

-

694

6.19%

6.19%

Series 13

03/04/2009

USD

23

Libor USD 3M + 0.55%

-

-

23

4.30%

4.30%

Series 14

06/30/2015

USD

42

4.69%

(1)

(1)

40

4.99%

5.01%

Series 15

06/17/2015

EUR

608

1.75%

(5)

-

603

4.12%

4.12%

Series 16

05/30/2007

EUR

500

Euribor 3M + 0.07%

-

-

500

2.52%

2.52%

Series 17

02/12/2016

EUR

900

4.00%

(6)

-

894

4.09%

4.09%

Series 18

12/11/2020

EUR

600

4.38%

(8)

-

592

4.50%

4.50%

Total national bond issues

  

6,867

 

(42)

114

6,939

n/a

n/a

USPP EUR 2013

01/30/2013

EUR

33

5.84%

(0.1)

-

33

5.89%

5.89%

USPP GBP 2013

01/30/2013

GBP

10

6.22%

-

-

10

6.27%

6.27%

USPP USD 2013

01/30/2013

USD

125

5.78%

(0.4)

(2)

122

5.83%

5.65%

USPP USD 2015

01/30/2015

USD

106

6.02%

(0.3)

-

106

6.06%

5.62%

USPP USD 2018

01/30/2018

USD

72

6.31%

(0.2)

1

73

6.35%

5.70%

Total private placements

  

346

 

(1.0)

(1)

344

n/a

n/a

Three Valleys bond issue

07/13/2026

GBP

292

5.88%

(6)

-

286

6.05%

6.05%

Montgomery bond issue

01/11/2014

USD

74

5.00%

1

-

75

3.60%

3.60%

Tyseley bond issue

07/30/2018

GBP

71

6.67%

(9)

-

63

9.50%

9.50%

MBM Chicago Biosolids bond issue

11/01/2023

USD

43

5.92%

-

-

43

5.92%

5.92%

Selchp bond issue

12/31/2021

GBP

34

7.14%

(0.6)

-

33

7.39%

7.39%

Total bond issues

  

7,727

 

(57)

113

7,783

n/a

n/a

* including long-term interest

Operation



(€ million)

Final maturity

Currency

Nominal in € million

Interest rate

Net carrying amount

Series 7

02/01/2012

EUR

1,000

5.88%

966

Series 8

04/29/2009

CZK

25

Pribor 3M + 0.67%

25

Series 9

04/23/2010

CZK

22

Pribor 3M + 0.67%

22

Series 10

05/28/2013

EUR

1,000

4.88%

966

Series 10bis

05/28/2018

EUR

750

5.38%

736

Series 12

11/25/2033

EUR

700

6.13%

694

Series 13

03/04/2009

USD

18

Libor USD 3M + 0.55%

18

Series 14

06/30/2015

USD

34

4.69%

33

Series 15

06/17/2015

EUR

600

1.75% (1)

632

Series 17

02/12/2016

EUR

900

4.00%

875

Series 18

12/11/2020

EUR

600

4.38%

579

Series 21

01/16/2017

EUR

1,000

4.38%

989

Series 23

05/24/2022

EUR

1,000

5.13%

988

Series 24

10/29/2037

GBP

682

6.13%

668

Total bond issues (EMTN)

n/a

n/a

8,331

n/a

8,191

USPP EUR 2013

01/30/2013

EUR

33

5.84%

33

USPP GBP 2013

01/30/2013

GBP

9

6.22%

9

USPP USD 2013

01/30/2013

USD

100

5.78%

100

USPP USD 2015

01/30/2015

USD

85

6.02%

87

USPP USD 2018

01/30/2018

USD

58

6.31%

60

Total U.S. private placements

n/a

n/a

285

n/a

289

Three Valleys bond issue

07/13/2026

GBP

273

5.88%

268

Stirling Water Seafield Finance bond issue

09/26/2026

GBP

63

5.82%

59

Total principal bond issues

n/a

n/a

8,952

n/a

8,807

(1)

Linked to European inflation.


Break down of other long-term borrowings by main component:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2004

As of December 31, 2005

Maturity

 

1 to 2 years

2 to 5 years

After five years

BWB and SPE debts (a)

1,704.7

2,126.0

607.8

697.8

820.4

Cogevolt (b)

561.5

457.0

196.5

217.5

43.0

Syndicated credit in CZK (c)

262.6

344.8

-

206.9

137.9

Securitization (d)

334.2

333.7

333.7

-

-

Local authority borrowing annuities (e)

112.7

120.3

36.9

43.9

39.5

Shenzhen (f)

88.9

105.3

-

5.2

100.1

Marius Pedersen

101.2

101.2

101.2

-

-

Finance lease obligations (g)

892.6

802.0

185.9

252.8

363.3

Other < €100 million

1,346.5

1,474.6

336.0

512.7

625.9

Other long-term borrowings

5,404.9

5,864.9

1,798.0

1,936.8

2,130.1

(a)

The Berliner Wasser Betriebe debt consists of :

The debt borne by the operating companies of €1,192.0 million as of December 31, 2005 compared to €1,040.1 million as of December 31, 2004;

Acquisition debt of €600 million as of December 31, 2005. The Berlin contract acquisition debt borne by RWE/Veolia Wasser Beteiligungs AG (“RVB”) of €600 million, maturing January 15, 2005, was refinanced in the same amount for three years, maturing January 15, 2008.

Special purpose entity (SPE) debts total €334.0 million as of December 31, 2005, compared to €364.6 million as of December 31, 2004.

(b)

This securitization of future receivables was organized to finance cogeneration installations in the Energy Services Division. The debt reflects payments due to the amortization of future receivables over the period to May 2012. The average fixed rate of interest payable on this debt is 5.42%.

(c)

This CZK 12 billion syndicated credit facility arranged by Komerčni Banka, Crédit Lyonnais and ING Bank in favor of Veolia Environnement, refinances the five-year CZK 8 billion syndicated credit facility negotiated in November 2003. It includes a five-year tranche of CZK 8 billion (maturing July 29, 2010) and a seven-year tranche of CZK 4 billion (maturing July 27, 2012). As of December 31, 2005, this syndicated credit facility had been drawn down CZK 10 billion (€344.8 million euro equivalent).

(d)

The French securitization program is governed by an agreement signed in June 2002 for five years with a securitized debt fund, covering maximum receivables of €500 million. Veolia Environnement has securitized receivables through its Water Division in the amount of €413.3 million net of discount. Pursuant to the French Financial Security Act of August 1, 2003 and the new accounting standards, Veolia Environnement consolidated the Acqueduc debt fund in the amount of €333.7 million as of December 31, 2005. This debt bears interest at Euribor 1 month + 0.20%.

(e)

The Group assumes certain fee obligations to local authorities under public service contracts. Local authority borrowing annuities as of December 31, 2005 total €120.3 million.

(f)

This financing which concerns the comprehensive water management contract for the town of Shenzhen is carried by Beijing Capital VW Invest.Co and is consolidated (50%) as of December 31, 2005 in the euro equivalent of €105.3 million. This Chinese yuan redeemable loan matures in June 2022 and bears interest to November 22, 2010 at a fixed-rate of 6.93% (revisable every six years).

(g)

As of December 31, 2005, finance lease obligations fall due between 2005 and 2031. Depending on the currency, fixed interest rates are between 2.90% and 12.09% and floating interest rates are indexed to EONIA, euro T4M (average monthly yield on the money market) and euro TAM (annualized money market rate) or their equivalent for financing in other currencies.




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-25F-67



Back to contentsContents


Long-termBreakdown of other non current borrowings by main component:

(€ million)


As of

December 31, 2005

As of

December 31, 2006

As of

December 31, 2007

Maturity

< 3 years

3 to 5 years

> 5 years

BWB and SPE debts (a)

2,126.0

2,067.1

1,234.8

264.4

261.5

708.9

Finance leases obligations (b)

802.0

866.1

754.5

289.0

187.8

277.7

Syndicated credit facility in CZK (c)

344.8

363.8

338.0

225.3

112.7

-

Minority interest put options (Note 1.14.5)

177.7

276.0

309.9

100.6

203.2

6.1

Cogevolt (d)

457.0

358.8

259.7

89.0

167.1

3.6

Aquiris (e)

-

164.2

184.2

15.5

15.6

153.1

Redal (f)

128.9

97.3

161.3

33.1

26.0

102.2

VSA Tecnitalia (g)

-

-

164.6

45.0

60.2

59.4

Delfluent (h)

74.4

102.3

118.3

24.7

8.0

85.6

Shenzhen (i)

105.3

97.5

93.2

-

-

93.2

Local authority borrowing annuities (j)

120.3

101.1

67.3

28.1

34.8

4.4

Other < €100 million

1,528.5

1,089.9

1,252.6

521.7

43.3

687.6

Other non current borrowings

5,864.9

5,584.1

4,938.4

1,636.4

1,120.2

2,181.8

(a)

The Berliner Wasser Betriebe ("BWB") long-term borrowing breaks down as follows:

-

The debt borne by the operating companies of €933.3 million as of December 31, 2007 compared to €1,148.7 million as of December 31, 2006;

-

Special purpose entity (SPE) debts of €301.5 million as of December 31, 2007 compared to €318.4 million as of December 31, 2006.

The decrease in BWB long-term borrowings on December 31, 2006 is mainly due to the reclassification of acquisition debt of €600 million, maturing January 15, 2008, in short-term borrowings.

(b)

As of December 31, 2007, finance lease obligations fall due between 2009 and 2031. Interest rates are fixed or floating (indexed to EONIA, euro T4M (average monthly yield on the money market) and euro TAM (annualized money market rate) or their equivalent for financing in other currencies).

(c)

This CZK 12 billion syndicated credit facility arranged by Komerčni Banka, Crédit Lyonnais and ING Bank in favor of Veolia Environnement, refinanced in 2005 the five-year CZK 8 billion syndicated credit facility negotiated in November 2003. It includes a CZK 8 billion tranche maturing July 29, 2010 and a CZK 4 billion tranche maturing July 27, 2012). As of December 31, 2007, this syndicated credit facility had been drawn down by CZK 9 billion (€338.0 million euro equivalent).

(d)

This securitization of future receivables was organized to finance cogeneration installations in the Energy Services Division. The debt reflects payments due in respect of the amortization of future receivables over the period to May 2012. The average fixed rate of interest payable on this debt is 5.25%.

(e)

This financing carried by Aquiris in respect of the North Brussels wastewater treatment plant construction project, was secured in December 2006. It comprises two credit lines bearing floating-rate interest. As of December 31, 2007, the lines had been drawn in the amount of €184.2 million.

(f)

Non-recourse debt carried by Redal, Morocco, maturing on December 31, 2018, of €161.3 million as of December 31, 2007.

(g)

Primarily comprises two floating-rate redeemable financing lines of €131.5 million secured by VSA Tecnitalia to finance waste thermal treatment plant projects.  

(h)

Three floating-rate financing lines carried by Delfluent BV in respect of the Hague wastewater treatment plant construction project. One of these lines is repayable in full on maturity in 2009 (€17.5 million), while the other two lines, maturing 2030, are redeemable loans. As of December 31, 2007, the three lines had been drawn in the total amount of €118.3 million.

(i)

This financing which concerns the comprehensive water management contract for the town of Shenzhen is carried by Beijing Capital VW Invest. Co and is consolidated (50%) as of December 31, 2007 in the euro equivalent of €93.2 million. This Renminbi redeemable loan matures in June 2022 and bears interest to November 22, 2010 at a fixed-rate of 6.93% (revisable every six years).

(j)

The Group assumes certain fee obligations to local authorities under public service contracts. Consolidated local authority borrowing annuities total €67.3 million as of December 31, 2007.



F-68



Back to Contents


Non current borrowings break down by original currency (before swap transactions) as follows (amortized cost or fair value):follows:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

   

Euro

11,103.5

9,922.8

U.S. Dollar

655.2

480.6

Pound Sterling

515.8

527.8

Czech Crown

446.8

370.3

Chinese Yuan

139.9

103.7

Australian Dollar

137.8

97.7

Korean Won

122.4

130.9

Polish Zloty

62.5

23.3

Norwegian Crown

41.7

55.8

Other

497.2

444.1

Long-term borrowings

13,722.8

12,157.0


(€ million)

As of December
31,  2005

As of December
31, 2006

As of December
31, 2007

Euro

11,103.5

11,542.0

10,701.8

Pound Sterling

515.8

554.0

1,290.1

U.S. Dollar

655.2

558.2

641.7

Czech Crown

446.8

447.1

418.7

Renminbi (Chinese Yuan)

139.9

183.8

218.1

Polish Zloty

62.5

64.7

88.2

Korean Won

122.4

60.8

49.3

Norwegian Crown

41.7

37.9

28.2

Australian Dollar

137.8

17.4

9.9

Other

497.2

535.7

502.0

Non current borrowings

13,722.8

14,001.6

13,948.0

The increaseGroup uses finance leases to finance the purchase of certain operating property, plant and equipment and real estate assets recorded in euro-denominated long-term borrowings of €1,181 million in 2005 is mainly due to:

the refinancing of a portion of the Berlin acquisition debt in the amount of €300 million (consolidated portion);

the issue of bonds indexed to European inflation for €600 million;

the partial repurchase of the June 2008 bond issue in the amount of €1.15 billion (initial issue of €2.0 billion,, €1.85 billion of which remained outstanding after the partial repurchase at the beginning of 2004), followed by a €1.5 billion bond issue comprising two tranches (a €900 million 10-year tranche and a €600 million 15-year tranche), generating a net increase of €350 million;

the issue of €500 million floating-rate notes maturing May 30, 2007.


This increase was partially offset by:

the repurchase on March 31, 2005 in the amount of €300 million of the subordinated loan notes redeemable in preference shares (TSAR);

other decreases attributable to principal payments on the non-current debt.


balance sheet assets.

Undrawn credit lines


The main undrawn credit linesAssets financed by finance leases as of December 31, 2005 were2007 are as follows:


undrawn “multi-purpose” short-term credit lines of €250 million,

undrawn “multi-purpose” medium-term credit lines of €725 million,

medium-term syndicated loan of €4,000 million maturing April 20, 2012,

medium-term syndicated loan of €69 million maturing July 20, 2010.

(€ million)

Property, plant and equipment, net

Concession intangible assets

Operating financial assets

Total

As of December 31, 2007

423.5

191.7

284.8

900.0

As of December 31, 2006

433.0

327.1

362.7

1,122.8

As of December 31, 2005

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

925.0


With the context of IFRS transition from January 1, 2004, Veolia Environnement launched into discussions with financial institutions involved in some financings (syndicated credits, credit lines) in order to adapt the headings and commitments levels of the Group (mainly structural subordination) to the new standards. These technical discussions do not aim at modifying Group’s commitments.


Note 21


Other non-current liabilities


Movements in other non-current liabilities during 2005:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2004

Additions

Repayments / removals

Changes in consolidation scope

Fair value adjustments

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2005

Other non-current liabilities

163.8

18.2

(40.9)

6.9

(3.2)

15.9

47.1

207.8

No other non-current liabilities were transferred to Liabilities of discontinued operations in 2004 or 2005.


The main other non-current liabilities asAs of December 31, 2005 include:

Discounted guarantee deposits paid by subscribers of €45.1 million (Veolia Water France) ;

Back tax payable of €32 million (Veolia Water UK);

Share capital increases in progress: Fort Bonifacio (Philippines) +€23 million and Clark Veolia (Philippines) +€7.4 million (Veolia Water) ;

Concession rights of €20.3 million (Veolia Energy Services);

Dade deferred income of €13.5 million (Waste Management Division).


Note 22


Short-term borrowings2007, future minimum lease payments under these contracts break down as follows:


Movements in short-term borrowings during 2005 (amortized cost or fair value):


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2004

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2005

Short-term borrowings

5,426.1

(2,936.2)

20.8

37.3

(409.8)

2,138.2

No short-term borrowings were transferred to Liabilities of discontinued operations in 2004 or 2005.


Short-term borrowings total €2,138.2 million as of December 31, 2005, compared to €5,426.1 million as of December 31, 2004. This decrease is mainly due to:

the redemption of the OCEANE bonds in the amount of €1,535 million on January 1, 2005;

the redemption of the EMTN Series 6 in the amount of €500 million;

the decrease of accrued interest on bonds for €62 million;

the expiry of the consolidated discounted receivables program for €295 million in the Waste Management Division and €252 million in the Energy Services Division;

the transfer of short-term borrowings to long-term borrowings in RVB in Germany in the amount of €380 million, following the renegotiation of maturities.

(€ million)

Finance leases (in the Balance Sheet)

2008

172.9

2009 & 2010

328.8

2011 & 2012

256.5

2013 and thereafter

381.7

Total future minimum lease payments

1,139.9

Less amounts representing interest

265.6

Present value of minimum lease payments (finance leases)

874.3




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-26F-69



Back to contentsContents


Recap: Movements in long-term borrowings during 2006:


(€ million)

As of

December 31, 2005

Increases / subscriptions

Repayments

Changes in consolidation scope

Fair value adjustments

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of

December 31, 2006

Bonds

7,857.9

1,287.4

(38.3)

-

(138.0)

(40.1)

(511.4)

8,417.5

Other long-term borrowings

5,864.9

865.3

(938.5)

259.6

0.4

(21.2)

(446.4)

5,584.1

Long-term borrowings

13,722.8

2,152.7

(976.8)

259.6

(137.6)

(61.3)

(957.8)

14,001.6


NOTE 19.

Current borrowings

Movements in short-term borrowings during2007:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2006

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Fair value adjustments

Foreign exchange translation

Non-current / current reclassification

Other

As of December 31, 2007

Short-term borrowings

2,904.1

(1,464.8)

421.4

(16.0)

(132.3)

2,097.4

(4.8)

3,805.0

Short-term borrowings are recorded as financial liabilities at amortized cost for accounting purposes.

Short-term borrowings total €3,805.0 million as of December 31, 2007, compared to €2,904.1 million as of December 31, 2006.

This increase is mainly due to:

the reclassification of two bond issues in short-term borrowings given their maturity:

-

a €700 million bond issue maturing June 27, 2008,

-

a €300 million bond issue maturing February 15, 2008,

the issue on February 26, 2007 of a €200 million bond issue, maturing August 27, 2008,

the redemption of two bond issues: a €491 million bond issue performed in 2005 on May 30, 2007 and a €142 million bond issue performed in January 2006 on July 18, 2007.

a decrease in treasury note outstandings of €624 million.

the transfer to short-term borrowings of minority interest put options in the amount of €141 million in the Environmental Services Division,

the transfer to short-term borrowings of the Berlin acquisition debt (€600 million), maturing January 15, 2008.

As of December 31, 2005,2007, short-term borrowings concern mainly concern:

Veolia Environnement SA for €1,209€1,937.2 million (including treasury notes of €1,033€109.0 million, bond issues maturing within one year of €1,201.9 million, securitization program debts of €342.4 million and accrued interest on bondsdebt of €152€271.0 million), ;

the Water Division for €402€964.5 million (mainly(including the company carrying the Berlin contract for €127€600 million);



F-70



Back to Contents


the Environmental Services Division for €372.4 million Dailly discounted receivables(including minority interest put options of €67 million and Compagnie Générale des Eaux for €58€141.0 million),

the Energy Services Division for €250€430.7 million (mainly financing interest in respect(including the short-term portion of Cogevolt financing of €104 million and Siram in Italy of €40€99.1 million), the Waste Management Division for €172 million and ;

the Transportation Division for €70 million (unitary amounts of less than €8 million). €72.3 million;

Short-term borrowings in respect of Group finance leases totaled €102€125.6 million as of December 31, 2005 (see note 39).2007, compared to €131.3 million as of December 31, 2006.


Recap: Movements in short-term borrowings during 2006:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2006

Short-term borrowings

2,138.2

(239.2)

89.8

(7.6)

922.9

2,904.1


Note 23NOTE 20.


Bank overdrafts and other cash position item


items

Movements in bank overdrafts and other cash position items during 2005:2007:


(€ million)

As of December 31,2004

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2006

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2007

Water

143.9

55.0

(0.2)

2.6

21.6

222.9

135.3

65.8

12.0

(2.6)

(1.5)

209.0

Waste Management

78.1

(26.0)

39.6

3.9

(8.2)

87.4

Environmental Services

96.9

32.2

1.7

(2.2)

2.0

130.6

Energy Services

167.2

(7.3)

12.0

(0.8)

(9.5)

161.6

174.5

(90.5)

8.6

0.3

(1.2)

91.7

Transportation

20.0

11.8

(6.2)

1.1

5.7

32.4

26.2

(2.7)

2.2

0.1

0.2

26.0

Other

10.9

12.3

3.0

0.3

(24.0)

2.5

23.1

(20.4)

0.4

-

(1.0)

2.1

Bank overdrafts and other cash position item

420.1

45.8

48.2

7.1

(14.4)

506.8

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items


456.0

(15.6)

24.9

(4.4)

(1.5)

459.4


NoRecap: Movements in bank overdrafts were transferred to Liabilities of discontinued operations in 2004 or 2005.and other cash position items during 2006:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2006

Water

222.9

(96.9)

8.6

(1.3)

2.0

135.3

Environmental Services

87.4

10.4

7.1

(1.9)

(6.1)

96.9

Energy Services

161.6

(21.7)

27.6

0.2

6.8

174.5

Transportation

32.4

(9.0)

4.4

(0.2)

(1.4)

26.2

Other

2.5

20.4

0.2

-

-

23.1

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

506.8

(96.8)

47.9

(3.2)

1.3

456.0


Note 24



F-71



Back to Contents

Revenue


Break downNOTE 21.

Revenue

Breakdown of Revenuerevenue (see note 1.17)


(€ million)

For the year ended December 31,

2005

2004

Sales of goods

2,474.7

2,624.4

Services rendered

21,366.3

18,788.5

Construction contracts

1,162.6

843.4

IFRIC 4 loans income

125.8

96.7

IFRIC 4 loans recognized on a completion basis

115.5

147.3

Revenue

25,244.9

22,500.3


(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Services rendered

27,305.8

24,441.3

21,826.4

Sales of goods

1,464.8

1,609.1

1,387.9

Revenue from operating financial assets

345.1

351.0

325.8

Construction

3,512.5

2,219.0

2,030.3

Revenue

32,628.2

28,620.4

25,570.4

Sales of goods mainly concern sales of technological solutions in the Water Division with the construction business related to supplies and cleanings management, and the Waste Management Division with sales of products relatedrelating to recycling activities.activities in the Environmental Services Division.

The marked increase in Construction revenue is mainly due to the growth of the Water Division and building activities in France.


Note 25NOTE 22.


Operating income


Operating income is calculated as follows:

(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Revenue

32,628.2

28,620.4

25,570.4

Cost of sales

(26,929.6)

(23,427.1)

(20,869.9)

o/w:

Impairment losses on goodwill and negative goodwill recorded in the Income Statement

18.2

10.7

(7.2)

Restructuring costs

(28.8)

(25.1)

(16.2)

Selling costs

(551.3)

(515.2)

(478.5)

General and administrative expenses

(2,757.0)

(2,611.2)

(2,394.9)

o/w:

Research and development costs

(84.6)

(66.4)

(62.9)

Other operating revenue and expenses

106.6

66.0

65.8

o/w:

Capital gains and losses on disposal

106.6

50.9

57.9

Other

-

15.1

7.9

Operating income

2,496.9

2,132.9

1,892.9



(€ million)

For the year ended December 31,

2005

2004

Revenue from ordinary activities

25,244.9

22,500.3

Cost of sales

(20,561.0)

(18,346.3)

o/w

Impairment losses on intangible assets with an indefinite useful life

(7.2)

(71.9)

Restructuring costs

(16.2)

(46.8)

Selling costs

(478.5)

(439.7)

General and administrative expenses

(2,403.0)

(2,236.4)

o/w:

Research and development costs

(62.9)

(62.6)

Other operating revenue and expenses

90.5

2.7

o/w:

Capital gains and losses on asset sales

57.9

(102.1)

Other

32.6

104.8

Operating income

1,892.9

1,480.6


F-72



Back to Contents


Operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses included in the Cash flow statement for the year ended December 31, 2005operating income in2007 break down as follows:


(€ million)

Charge

Reversal

Net (charge)/reversal

Charge

Reversal

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Operating depreciation, amortization and provisions and impairment losses excepted goodwill

(2,199.7)

749.5

(1,450.2)

Operating depreciation, amortization and provisions, net

(2,529.8)

1,067.5

(1,462.3)

(1,409.8)

(1,292.5)

Depreciation and amortization

  

(1,572.1)

24.0

(1,548.1)

(1,356.8)

(1,253.3)

Property, plant and equipment

(1,258.8)

0.7

(1,258.1)

(1,202.2)

24.0

(1,178.2)

(1,045.8)

(949.3)

Intangible assets

(173.9)

0.1

(173.8)

(369.9)

-

(369.9)

(311.0)

(304.0)

Impairment losses

  

(234.6)

186.6

(48.0)

(59.7)

(40.2)

Property, plant and equipment

(11.5)

16.4

4.9

(43.3)

7.6

(35.7)

(16.2)

(7.8)

Intangible assets

(1.3)

0.6

(0.7)

(7.8)

(4.7)

Inventories

(11.1)

9.2

(1.9)

(9.5)

8.0

(1.5)

(2.4)

(1.9)

Trade accounts receivable

(129.0)

118.8

(10.2)

Other operating accounts receivable

(27.3)

11.9

(15.4)

Trade receivables

(166.4)

126.5

(39.9)

(38.9)

(10.4)

Other operating and non-operating receivables

(14.1)

43.9

29.8

5.6

(15.4)

Non-current and current operating provisions other than replacement provisions

(588.1)

592.4

4.3

(723.1)

856.9

133.8

6.7

1.0

Impairment losses on goodwill

(35.5)

7.5

(28.0)

Replacement costs *

(351.1)

-

(351.1)

Non-current operating provisions other than replacement provisions

(395.8)

450.3

54.5

(99.1)

(43.0)

Current operating provisions

(327.3)

406.6

79.3

105.8

44.0

Replacement costs*

 

(358.4)

(368.1)

(351.1)

Impairment losses and impact of disposals on goodwill and negative goodwill presented in the Income Statement

 

18.2

0.6

(28.0)

Operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses

(2,586.3)

757.0

(1,829.3)

 

(1,802.5)

(1,777.3)

(1,671.6)

*

Replacement costs:all replacement costs for concession assets in the context of public service delegation contracts in France are considered in the cash flow statement as investments, irrespective of whether the infrastructure was originally financed by the concession holder. As such, in the passage from net income (loss) to net cash from operating activities, all replacement costs are eliminated under adjustments for operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses.

*

Replacement costs:all replacement costs for concession assets in the context of public service delegation contracts in France are considered in the cash flow statement as investments, irrespective of whether the infrastructure was originally financed by the concession holder. As such, in the passage from net income (loss) to net cash from operating activities, all replacement costs are eliminated under adjustments for operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses.


* Replacement costs: all replacement costs for publicly-owned utility networks are consideredOperating depreciation, amortization, charges to provisions and impairment losses in the cash flow statement as investments, irrespective of whether the utility network was originally financed by the concession holder. As such,include operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses transferred to Net income from discontinued operations in the passage from net income (loss) to net cash from operating activities, all replacement costs are eliminated under adjustments for depreciation, amortization and provisions.amount of €22.6 million in 2007 (primarily Transportation Division operations in Denmark).




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-27F-73



Back to contentsContents


Recap: Operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses included in operating income in 2006 break down as follows:


(€ million)

Charge

Reversal

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Operating depreciation, amortization and provisions, net

(2,166.2)

756.4

(1,409.8)

(1,292.5)

Depreciation and amortization

(1,357.4)

0.6

(1,356.8)

(1,253.3)

Property, plant and equipment

(1,046.4)

0.6

(1,045.8)

(949.3)

Intangible assets

(311.0)

-

(311.0)

(304.0)

Impairment losses

(208.6)

148.9

(59.7)

(40.2)

Property, plant and equipment

(26.2)

10.0

(16.2)

(7.8)

Intangible assets

(7.8)

-

(7.8)

(4.7)

Inventories

(13.4)

11.0

(2.4)

(1.9)

Trade receivables

(152.7)

113.8

(38.9)

(10.4)

Other operating and non-operating receivables

(8.5)

14.1

5.6

(15.4)

Non-current and current operating provisions other than replacement provisions

(600.2)

606.9

6.7

1.0

Non-current operating provisions other than replacement provisions

(287.1)

188.0

(99.1)

(43.0)

Current operating provisions

(313.1)

418.9

105.8

44.0

Replacement costs*

  

(368.1)

(351.1)

Impairment losses and impact of disposals on goodwill and negative presented in the Income Statement

  

0.6

(28.0)

Operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses

  

(1,777.3)

(1,671.6)




F-74



Back to Contents


ImpairmentBreakdown of impairment losses and the impact of disposals on goodwill


Impairment losses on goodwill break down as follows:follows (see also Note 4):


(€ million)

For the year ended December 31,

2005

2004

   

Impairment losses on Scandinavian goodwill in the Transportation Division

-

(70.0)

Impairment losses on goodwill (Waste Management Division)

(10.0)

-

Impairment losses on goodwill (Energy Services Division)

(4.7)

-

Reversal of negative goodwill (Water Division)

5.2

-

Other

2.3

(1.9)

Impairment losses on goodwill presented in Cost of sales in the Income statement

(7.2)

(71.9)

Impairment losses on nuclear division goodwill in respect of Clemessy following its divestment (Energy Services Division)

(14.0)

-

Impairment losses on Facility Management goodwill in Germany following its divestment (Energy Services Division)

(6.8)

-

Impairment losses on goodwill presented in Other operating revenue and expenses in the Income statement

(20.8)

-

Impairment losses on goodwill

(28.0)

(71.9)

(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Impairment losses on goodwill of the Environmental Services Division Israel CGU

-

-

(10.0)

Impairment losses on goodwill of the Energy Services Division Stérience CGU

-

-

(4.7)

Impairment losses on goodwill of the Eurolines CGU

(6.9)

-

-

Negative goodwill recorded in the Income Statement - Water Division

-

11.2

5.2

Negative goodwill recorded in the Income Statement - SNCM

10.9

-

-

Negative goodwill recorded in the Income Statement following employee share subscriptions – Lodz (Energy Services Division - Poland)

10.3

-

-

Other

3.9

(0.5)

2.3

Impairment losses on goodwill and negative goodwill presented in Cost of sales in the Income Statement

18.2

10.7

(7.2)

Impact of the partial sale of the Energy Services Division Clemessy CGU following the sale of the Nuclear business

-

-

(14.0)

Impact of the partial sale of the Energy Services Division Germany CGU following the sale of the Facility Management business

-

-

(6.8)

Corrections to purchase price allocations in the Water Division Germany CGU

-

(2.8)

-

Impairment losses on goodwill of the Transportation Division Germany CGU

-

(7.3)

-

Impairment losses and impact of disposals on goodwill presented in Other operating revenue and expenses in the Income Statement

-

(10.1)

(20.8)

Impairment losses and impact of disposals on goodwill and negative presented in the Income Statement

18.2

0.6

(28.0)


Restructuring costs


(€ million)

For the year ended December 31,

2005

2004

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Restructuring expenses

(36.0)

(53.7)

(29.7)

(30.6)

(36.0)

Net charge to restructuring provisions

19.8

6.9

0.9

5.5

19.8

Restructuring costs

(16.2)

(46.8)

(28.8)

(25.1)

(16.2)


As of December 31, 2005,2007, restructuring costs mainly concern the Energy Services Division (-€9.410.4 million), the Transportation Division (-€11.8 million) and the Water Division (-€3.83.7 million).




F-75



Back to Contents


Personnel costs


(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Employee costs

(9,826.8)

(8,786.5)

(7,952.6)

Profit sharing and incentive schemes

(169.1)

(165.7)

(153.7)

Share-based compensation (IFRS 2)

(65.4)

(40.9)

(30.3)

Personnel costs

(10,061.3)

(8,993.1)

(8,136.6)

Personnel costs

The IFRS 2 share-based compensation expense in respect of 2007 (€65.4 million) concerns employee shareholding transactions, including employee benefits totaled €8.2 billion in 2005 compared to €7.4 billion in 2004.the employer contribution and the free share issue (€49.8 million) and share option programs (€15.6 million).


(€ million)

For the year ended December 31,

2005

2004

Employee costs

(8,132.3)

(7,375.2)

Profit sharing

(58.5)

(51.5)

Share-based compensation (IFRS 2)

(30.3)

(6.9)

Total personnel costs

(8,221.1)

(7,433.6)


Research and development costs


Research and development costs amounted tototaled €84.6 million, €66.4 million and €62.9 million in 2007, 2006 and €62.6 million in 2005 and 2004 respectively.


Note 26NOTE 23.


Net finance costs

Finance costs, net


The income and expense balances making up net finance costs are as follows (see definition in note 1.18):follows:


(€ million)

For the year ended December 31,

2005

2004

   

Income

68.3

97.0

Expense

(781.7)

(829.1)

Finance costs, net

(713.4)

(732.1)

(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Finance income

152.5

82.8

63.3

Finance costs

(969.6)

(783.8)

(774.0)

Net finance costs

(817.1)

(701.0)

(710.7)


The financing rate is 5.12%, compared to 5.04% in 2004.

This slight increase in the financing rate mainly reflects the appreciation of several currencies against the euroFinance costs and in particular the US dollar, andfinance income represent the cost of extending the maturityborrowings net of borrowings.cash and cash equivalents. In addition, net finance costs include net gains and losses on derivatives allocated to borrowings, irrespective of whether they qualify for hedge accounting.

(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006  

Year ended December 31, 2005

Financial liabilities at amortized cost

(891.4)

n.a.

n.a.

Commission not included in the Effective Interest Rate

(4.2)

n.a.

n.a.

Expenses on gross indebtedness

(895.6)

(750.0)

(744.8)

Assets at fair value through profit and loss (fair value option)*

129.5

81.0

62.0

Net gains and losses on derivative instruments and hedging relationships

(51.0)

(32.0)

(27.9)

Net finance costs

(817.1)

(701.0)

(710.7)

*Cash equivalents are valued at fair value through profit and loss.




F-76



Back to Contents


Net gains and losses on derivative instruments and hedging relationships include the following amounts as of December 31, 2007 :

the remeasurement of debts hedged as to fair value hedge in 2005 include €26.0the amount of €53.5 million,

the remeasurement of fair value hedge derivative instruments in the amount of -€53.4 million,

the expense relating to the ineffective portion of cash flow hedging relationships in the amount of -€0.8 million in net finance costs,

net gains and losses on “trading derivative” instruments of -€29.5 million, including €7.3 million in respect of the redemptioninterest rate derivatives and -€36.8 million in respect of foreign exchange derivatives hedging financing (see Note 30) recognized in net finance costs. In addition, €11.7 million is recorded in Other financial income and expenses and -€0.3 million in operating income.

The residual balance under this line item represents interest flows on hedging relations (fair value hedges and cash flow hedges).

In addition, no amounts were recorded in 2007 in respect of the 2008 bondsineffective portion of relationships hedging net investments in a foreign currency and the amount transferred from equity to the Income Statement in respect of €1,150 million. This early redemptioncash flow hedges was performednot material.

Interest income on instruments at amortized cost (including interest income recorded in order to optimize the maturityoperating income and future cost of borrowings. In addition, fair value movements on derivative instruments not qualifying for hedge accountingin other financial income and expenses) totaled +€12.0 million, compared to +€7.6€388 million in 2004. These movements, which are calculated2007. Interest expenses on instruments at amortized cost (including interest expenses recorded in accordance with IAS 39, are highly volatileoperating income and in nature.other financial income and expenses) totaled €891.4 million in 2007.


Note 27NOTE 24.


Other financial income and expenses


(€ million)

For the year ended December 31,

2005

2004

   

Loan income

37.0

55.4

Dividends

6.5

5.9

Foreign exchange gains (losses)

14.3

(13.9)

Financial provisions

24.2

-

Other income (expense)

(51.5)

(1.3)

Other financial income and expenses

30.5

46.1


(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006  

Year ended December 31, 2005

Net gains on loans and receivables*

56.8

21.5

61.2

Net gains and losses on available-for-sale assets (including dividends)

10.3

9.7

6.5

Assets and liabilities at fair value through profit and loss

5.5

(21.6)

(6.1)

Unwinding of the discount on provisions

(60.8)

(15.9)

(17.3)

Foreign exchange gains and losses

(2.8)

(14.3)

14.3

Other expenses

(7.6)

(13.4)

(30.5)

Other financial income and expenses

1.4

(34.0)

28.1

*

including impairment losses of €7.7 million in 2007, compared to €8.4 million in 2006

Other financial income and expenses fellimproved from €46.1a net expense of €34.0 million in 20042006 to €30.5net income of €1.4 million in 2005.2007.

In 2004,This improvement in the contribution of other financial income and expenses includedis mainly due to:

- the capital gain realizedreversal of the foreign exchange position for €11,5 million,

- the remeasurement of embedded derivatives for €26.9 million (other income and expenses); the impact of the remeasurement of derivatives embedded in contracts and in particular certain industrial contracts in South Korea was €10.6 million in 2007, compared to -€16.3 million in 2006.

- an increase in net gains on loans and receivables of €34.6 million (including interest income of €26.5 million on the saleBerlin drainage receivable),

- offset by an increase in the negative impact of Vinci sharesthe unwinding of €44.4the discount on provisions of -€44.9 million. Excluding this capital gain, other financial incomeThe increase in the unwinding of long-term provisions in 2007 concerns SNCM (provision for onerous contracts), pension commitments and expenses increased by €28.8 million on 2004, mainly due to foreign exchange gains.provisions for closure and post-closure costs at waste storage facilities in the Environmental Services Division.






VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-28F-77



Back to contentsContents


In 2005:

Ø

loan income and dividends fell to €43.5 million;

Ø

foreign exchange gains totaled €14.3 million;

Ø

the unwinding of discount of site restoration provisions had an impact of -€15.7 million;

Ø

the revaluation of embedded derivatives had an impact of -€2.5 million.


2004 was marked by:

Ø

a capital gain of €44.4 million realized on the sale of Vinci shares by the Energy Services Division;

Ø

foreign exchange losses of €13.9 million;

Ø

the revaluation of embedded derivatives (-€12.9 million);

Ø

loan income and dividends of €61.3 million;

Ø

the unwinding of discount of site restoration provisions (-€10.8 million).


Note 28NOTE 25.

Income tax expense


Analysis of the Income Tax Expense


The income tax expense breaks down as follows:


(€ million)

 For the year ended December 31,

2005

2004

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Current income tax expense

(309.4)

(225.1)

(416.3)

(330.9)

(309.4)

France

(95.1)

(93.9)

(110.0)

(75.1)

(95.1)

Other countries

(214.3)

(131.2)

(306.3)

(255.8)

(214.3)

Deferred income tax expense (credit)

(113.5)

41.0

(3.8)

(78.7)

(113.0)

France

(52.5)

135.0

(96.0)

(103.1)

(49.2)

Other countries

(61.0)

(94.0)

92.2

24.4

(63.8)

Total income tax expense

(422.9)

(184.1)

(420.1)

(409.6)

(422.4)

A number of French subsidiaries elected to form a consolidated tax group with Veolia Environnement as the head company, with effect from January 1, 2001.2001 (five-year agreement, renewed in 2006). Veolia Environnement is liable to the French treasury department for the full income tax charge, calculated based on the group tax return. Any tax savings are recognized at Veolia Environnement SA level.

Veolia Environnement reorganized its U.S. tax group in 2006 and 2007. This reorganization is still being reviewed by the U.S. tax authorities (see Notes 12 and 37).

The increase in the tax expense in 2005 was mainly2007 is due to the increase in taxable income due to an improvement in operating performance. In France, this resulted in the utilization of tax losses carried forward, whereas in 2004 restructuring operations following divestments in the United States had enabled the recognition of deferred tax assets in respect of tax losses carried forward. The improvement in results in other countries led to to:

an increase in the currentGroup scope of consolidation and pre-tax income, tax expense.


Tax rate reconciliation


 

For the year ended
December 31, 2005

For the year ended
December 31, 2004

Legal tax rate

34.93%

35.43%

Impairment losses on goodwill not deductible for tax purposes

0.81%

3.21%

Differences in tax rate

-1.72%

-4.40%

Recognition/utilization of tax losses

-2.70%

-9.05%

Other, net

3.63%

-2.02%

Effective tax rate (a)

34.95%

23.17%

(a)

The effective tax rate is computed by dividingwhich increased both the current and deferred tax expense by pre-tax net income from continuing operations before shareexpense;

a decrease in the tax rate in a significant number of net incomecountries with a total positive impact of associates.€62.0 million in respect of deferred tax liability balances (including an impact of €54.6 million in Germany and the United Kingdom);

an improvement in the probability of using ordinary tax losses of the U.S. tax group, generating an additional deferred tax credit of €85 million.




F-78



Back to Contents


Effective tax rate


 

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Net income from ordinary activities before tax

1,681.2

1,397.9

1,210.3

Income tax expense

(420.1)

(409.6)

(422.4)

Legal tax rate

34.43%

34.43%

34.93%

Impairment losses on goodwill not deductible for tax purposes

0.11%

0.17%

0.81%

Differences in tax rate

(7.47%)

(5.78%)

(1.70%)

Effect of tax projections

(4.47%)

(6.09%)

(6.62%)

Dividends

2.12%

1.47%

2.48%

Taxation without basis

1.65%

0.71%

1.18%

Share-based compensation

-(b)

0.80%

0.71%

Other

(1.38%)

3.59%

3.11%

Effective tax rate (a)

24.99%

29.30%

34.90%

(a)

 The effective tax rate is computed by dividing the current and deferred tax expense by pre-tax net income from continuing operations before the share of net income of associates.

(b)

Information not material given the new tax provisions.



Note 29NOTE 26.


Share of net income of associates


The share of net income of associates decreasedincreased from €24.2€6.0 million forin 2006 to €16.9 million in 2007.

This increase is mainly due to an improvement in the year ended December 31, 2004 to €14.9 million forresults of Taiwan associates in the year ended December 31, 2005, followingEnvironmental Services Division and the transferentry into the scope of certain investments inconsolidation of the equity associates to non-consolidated investments (see note 8)of the SULO sub-group (Environmental Services Division - Germany).

The largest net income shares in 2005 were generated by Water Division associates (€10.8 million).


Note 30NOTE 27.


Net income from discontinued operations

During the first half of 2006, Veolia Environnement decided to withdraw from its partnership with the Royal Bank of Scotland in the Water sector in the United Kingdom and to sell its investment in Southern Water. Given the impact on the Water business in the United Kingdom and the unwinding of commitments at Veolia Environnement level, this transaction was recorded in the accounts in net income from discontinued operations in accordance with IFRS 5.

In addition, Group management decided to sell Transportation Division activities in Denmark, which were transferred in the accounts to discontinued operations.

The net loss from discontinued operations in 2007 mainly concerns Transportation Division activities in Denmark. These activities were effectively sold on August 31, 2007.  The amount recognized for the year includes the net loss for the period plus an additional impairment of goodwill.



F-79



Back to Contents


Movements in net income (expense) from discontinued operations:

(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Income (expense) from discontinued operations

(23.9)

(53.8)

0.7

Capital gains and losses on disposal

0.7

3.8

-

Income tax expense

-

50.6

-

Net income(expense) from discontinued operations

(23.2)

0.6

0.7


Breakdown of Net income (expense) from discontinued operations in2007:


(€ million)

Southern
Water (1)

Danish transportation activities (2)

Total

Income (expense) from discontinued operations

(1.9)

(22.0)

(23.9)

Capital gains and losses on disposal

-

0.7

0.7

Income tax expense

-

-

-

Net income (expense) from discontinued operations

(1.9)

(21.3)

(23.2)

(1) activity sold in 2006.

(2) decision made in 2006, sold in 2007.



The main Income Statement items for discontinued operations for the year endedDecember 31, 2007 are as follows:

(€ million)

Southern
Water

Danish transportation activities

Total

Revenue

-

65.5

65.5

Operating income

(1.9)

(20.5)

(22.4)

Financial items

-

(1.5)

(1.5)

Income tax expense

-

-

-

Share of net income of associates

-

-

-

Minority interests

-

-

-

Income (expense) from discontinued operations

(1.9)

(22,0)

(23.9)



Breakdown of Net income from discontinued operations in 2006.


(€ million)

Southern
Water

Danish transportation activities

Total

Income (expense) from discontinued operations

(1.9)

(51.9)

(53.8)

Capital gains and losses on disposal

3.8

-

3.8

Income tax expense

50.6

-

50.6

Net income (expense) from discontinued operations

52.5

(51.9)

0.6




F-80



Back to Contents


The main Income Statement items for discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 are as follows:


(€ million)

Southern Water

Danish transportation activities

Total

Revenue

-

108.2

108.2

Operating income

(4.4)

(51.2)

(55.6)

Financial items

-

(2.6)

(2.6)

Income tax expense

-

1.9

1.9

Share of net income of associates

2.5

-

2.5

Minority interests

-

-

-

Income (expense) from discontinued operations

(1.9)

(51.9)

(53.8)


Breakdown of net income from discontinued operations in 2005.


(€ million)

Southern Water

Danish transportation activities

Total

Income(expense) from discontinued operations

8.4

(7.7)

0.7

Capital gains and losses on disposal

-

-

-

Income tax expense

-

-

-

Net income (expense) from discontinued operations

8.4

(7.7)

0.7


The main Income Statement items for discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2005 was nil.

This heading breaks down as follows for the year ended December 31, 2004:


(€ million)

Water activities in the United States

FCC

U.K. Transportation activities

For the year ended December 31,2004

Income from discontinued operations

(1.4)

92.4

(1.9)

89.1

Capital gains and losses on disposal

(99.5)

(2.8)

-

(102.3)

Income tax expense

(61.3)

(31.2)

-

(92.5)

Net income from discontinued operations

(162.2)

58.4

(1.9)

(105.7)


The main Income statement items for discontinued operations for the year ended December 31,2004 are as follows:


(€ million)

Southern Water

Danish transportation activities

Total

Revenue

-

122.7

122.7

Operating income

-

(6.0)

(6.0)

Financial items

-

(1.7)

(1.7)

Income tax expense

-

-

-

Share of net income of associates

8.4

-

8.4

Minority interests

-

-

-

Income(expense) from discontinued operations

8.4

(7.7)

0.7




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-29F-81



Back to contentsContents





(€ million)

Water activities in the United States

FCC

U.K. Transportation activities

For the year ended December 31,2004

Revenue

878.3

1,488.7

-

2,367.0

Operating income

23.6

174.6

(1.9)

196.3

Financial items

(5.0)

(4.3)

-

(9.3)

Income tax expense

(7.9)

(34.8)

-

(42.7)

Share of net income of associates

(12.1)

35.7

-

23.6

Minority interests

-

(78.8)

-

(78.8)

Income from discontinued operations

(1.4)

92.4

(1.9)

89.1



Note 31NOTE 28.


Net income for the year attributable to minority interests


Net income attributable to minority interests for the year ended December 31, 20052007 is €179.0€326.9 million, compared to €137.5€236.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2004.2006. This heading mainlyitem concerns minority interests in the Water Division (€86.7 million), the Waste Management Division (€25.7 million), the Energy Services Division (€57.0 million) and the Transportation Division (€9.9 million). The increase between 2004 and 2005 is mainly attributable to the Water segment following the consolidation of the Braunschweig contract (+€9.8 million) and the improvement in the results of the Berlin water companies (+€31.7 million), whose 2004 results were affected by the capital loss generated by the sale of Berlikomm.

Net income attributable to minority interests for the year ended December 31, 2004 is €137.5 million. This heading mainly concerns minority interests in the Water Division (€49.2 million), and primarily the Berlin water companies, the Energy Services Division (€53.1 million), the Waste Management Division (€21.5 million) and the Transportation Division (€13.9 million).


subsidiaries.

Net income for the year attributable to minority interests breaks down by division as follows:


(€ million)

 

For the year ended December 31,

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

2005

2004

Water

(a)

86.7

49.2

Waste Management

(b)

25.7

21.5

Energy Services

(c)

57.0

53.1

Water (a)

178.9

115.7

83.1

Environmental Services

21.8

18.6

25.7

Energy Services (b)

96.4

87.1

54.7

Transportation

(d)

9.9

13.9

28.9

14.7

9.7

Other

 

(0.3)

(0.2)

0.9

0.1

(0.3)

Minority interests

 

179.0

137.5

326.9

236.2

172.9

(a)

Including €11.8minority interests in Germany (Berlin water services company and Stadtwerke of Braunschweig): €69 million in 2004 (impact of the capital loss on the sale of Berlikomm)2006 and €43.5€120.5 million in 2005 for the Berlin water companies, €7.9 million in 2004 and €0 million in 2005 for SEEG (Gabon) and €9.8 million in 2005 for Braunschweig (entry into consolidation scope).2007.

(b)

Including €8.6EDF's interest in Dalkia Holding of €58.1 million in 20042006 and €8.2€68.2 million for 2007 and the Lodz contract for €13.1 million in 2005 for Onyx Hong Kong2006 and €3.4€21.4 million in 2004 and €7.6 million in 2005 for Marius Pedersen  Czech Republic.

(c)

Including €47.1 million in 2004 and €43.2 million in 2005 in respect of EDF’s shares in Dalkia Holding.

(d)

Including €9.2 million in 2004 and €5.5 million in 2005 for MBCRC (Boston, United States).2007.


Note 32NOTE 29.


Earnings per share

NetBasic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income for the year attributable to equity holders of the parent


The recurring net income for the year attributable to equity holdersordinary shareholders of the parent company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the fiscal year.

Diluted earnings per share is defined as follows : recurring part of operating income + recurring part of financial items + recurring share ofcalculated by dividing net income of associates + recurring part of minority interests + normative income tax expense.


An accounting item is non-recurring if it is unlikely to recur during each period and if it substantially changes the economics of one or more cash-generating units.


2005 Net income for the year attributable to equity holdersordinary shareholders of the parent  breaks down as follows:company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the fiscal year plus the weighted average number of ordinary shares that would be issued following the conversion into ordinary shares of all potentially dilutive ordinary shares.


(€ million)

Recurring

Non-recurring

Total

Operating income

1,903.6

(10.7)

1,892.9

Finance costs, net

(713.4)

-

(713.4)

Other financial income and expenses

30.5

-

30.5

Income tax expense

(427.2)

4.3

(422.9)

Share of net income of associates

14.9

-

14.9

Net income from discontinued operations

-

-

-

Minority interests

(181.0)

2.0

(179.0)

2005 Net income for the year attributable to equity holders of the parent

627.4

(4.4)

623.0



2004 Net income for the year attributable to equity holders of the parent breaks down as follows:


(€ million)

Recurring

Non-recurring

Total

Operating income

1,619.6

(139.0)

1,480.6

Finance costs, net

(715.6)

(16.5)

(732.1)

Other financial income and expenses

1.7

44.4

46.1

Income tax expense

(321.6)

137.5

(184.1)

Share of net income of associates

24.2

-

24.2

Net income from discontinued operations

-

(105.7)

(105.7)

Minority interests

(137.5)

-

(137.5)

2004 Net income for the year attributable to equity holders of the parent

470.8

(79.3)

391.5




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-30F-82



Back to contentsContents



Note 33


EarningsNet income and the number of shares used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share are presented below for all activities.

 

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Weighted average number of ordinary shares (in millions)

   

Weighted average number of ordinary shares for the calculation of basic earnings per share

430.0

398.8

395.6

Theoretical number of additional shares resulting from the exercise of share purchase and subscription options

5.0

3.6

2.0

Weighted average number of ordinary shares for the calculation of diluted earnings per share (in millions)

435.0

402.4

397.6

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent per share (€ million)

   

Net income for the year attributable to equity holders of the parent

927.9

758.7

622.2

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent per share:

   

Basic

2.16

1.90

1.57

Diluted

2.13

1.89

1.56

Net income (expense) from discontinued operations per share (€ million)

   

Net income (expense) from discontinued operations

(23.2)

0.6

0.7

Net income (expense) from discontinued operations per share:

   

Basic

(0.05)

-

-

Diluted

(0.05)

-

-

Net income from continuing operations attributable to equity holders of the parent per share (€ million)

   

Net income form continuing operations attributable to equity holders of the parent

951.1

758.1

621.5

Net income from continuing operations attributable to equity holders of the parent per share:

   

Basic

2.21

1.90

1.57

Diluted

2.19

1.88

1.56

Following the share capital increase in July 2007, the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share was adjusted retrospectively for all periods presented.


 

For the year ended December 31,

2005

2004

Weighted average number of ordinary shares

  

Weighted average number of ordinary shares for the calculation of basic earnings per share

390.4

396.2

Theoretical number of additional shares resulting from the exercise of share option plans

2.0

0.1

Weighted average number of ordinary shares for the calculation of diluted earnings per share

392.4

396.3

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent per share

  

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent

623.0

391.5

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent per share

  

Basic

1.60

0.99

Diluted

1.59

0.99

Net income from continuing operations per share

  

Net income from continuing operations

802.0

634.7

Net income from continuing operations per share

  

Basic

2.05

1.60

Diluted

2.04

1.60

Net income from discontinued operations per share

  

Net income from discontinued operations

-

(105.7)

Net income from discontinued operations per share

  

Basic

-

(0.27)

Diluted

-

(0.27)


The only potentially dilutive instruments recognized by Veolia Environnement in the three periods are share subscription and purchase options.

The theoretical number of additional shares is based on the share option plans.purchase and subscription options.  The number of additional shares is calculated taking into account the difference between the 2000 plan exercise price of €31.41, the 2001 plan exercise price of €40.59, the 2002 plan exercise plan of €36.65, the 2003 plan exercise price of €22.50 and€22.14, the 2004 plan exercise price of €24.72€24.32 and the 2006 plan exercise price of €44.03 and the average price of the Veolia Environnement share in 20052007 of €31.33.€57.40.




F-83



Back to Contents

Note 34

Derivative instruments accounting position and market risks management


InNOTE 30.

Financial risk management

Group objectives and organization

The Group is exposed to the following financial risks in the course of its operating and financing activities, the Group is exposed to the following financial activities:

-

market risks: interest rate risk, foreign exchange risk, counterparty risk, liquiditycommodity risk and equity risk.

-

liquidity risk

-

credit risk

In order to reduce its exposure to these risks and to ensure better control, Veolia Environnement centralizes the management of these financial risks in order to ensure better control.risks. Activities are based on the management rules detailed in the internal manual “Rules"Rules governing financing/treasury management and related risks”risks" widely distributed to Group entities. These rules are based on the principles of security, transparency and effectiveness.

Executive management determines the Group management policy. The Group is organized around a central treasury department that:

-

centralizes Group cash, subject to local regulatory restrictions

-

manages financial risks

-

is the Division counterparty when negotiating derivative instruments

-

monitors Group counterparty risk

The fair value of derivatives instruments recognized in the balance sheet breaks down as follows:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Interest rate derivatives

71.1

113.0

80.9

77.4

195.7

97.8

Fair value hedges

21.2

48.9

45.2

16.3

164.7

2.5

Cash flow hedges

11.8

41.0

6.8

48.4

-

88.6

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

38.1

23.1

28.9

12.7

31.0

6.7

Foreign exchange derivatives

105.2

49.2

56.5

42.7

18.0

31.5

Net investment hedge

78.3

13.6

42.0

4.3

13.9

0.3

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

26.9

35.6

14.5

38.4

4.1

31.2

Other derivative instruments including commodity derivatives

61.8

35.6

64.2

25.8

35.3

25.2

Total derivative instruments

238.1

197.8

201.6

145.9

249.0

154.5


30.1

Market risk management

Veolia Environnement uses various derivative instruments qualifying or not for hedge accounting to reduce and manage its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates, exchange rates and commodity prices, not all of which qualify for hedge accounting.prices. All these derivatives are recognized in the balance sheet at fair value.






F-84



Back to Contents


The fair value of derivativederivatives instruments recognized in the balance sheet is determined and breaks down as follows:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31,2004

As of December 31, 2007

Internal model with observable parameters

(%)

Internal model with certain non-observable parameters

(%)

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

(€ million)

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

195.7

97.8

338.0

159.7

71.1

113.0

100.0%

-%

-%

Fair value hedges

164.7

2.5

286.0

-

Cash flow hedges

-

88.6

0.5

82.4

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

31.0

6.7

51.5

77.3

Foreign exchange derivatives

18.0

31.5

82.3

30.1

105.2

49.2

100.0%

-%

-%

Net investment hedges

13.9

0.3

71.9

-

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

4.1

31.2

10.4

30.1

Other derivative instruments including commodity derivatives

35.3

25.2

4.5

-

61.8

35.6

27.5%

56.7%

72.5%

43.3%

Total derivative instruments

249.0

154.5

424.8

189.8

238.1

197.8

81.2%

92.2%

18.8%

7.8%


(a)Derivative instruments valued using internal models integrating certain non-observable data are electricity derivative instruments for which there are no quoted prices in an active market (notably for electricity purchase options with extremely long maturity) or observable market data (forward prices for component materials), in particular for distant maturities. In such cases, parameters are estimated by Veolia Environnement experts.

Interest

(€ million)

As of December 31, 2006

Internal model with observable parameters

(%)

Internal model with certain non-observable parameters

(%)

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Interest rate derivatives

80.9

77.4

100.0%

100.0%

-%

-%

Foreign exchange derivatives

56.5

42.7

100.0%

100.0%

-%

-%

Other derivative instruments including commodity derivatives

64.2

25.8

13.1%

7.8%

86.9%

92.2%

Total derivative instruments

201.6

145.9

72.3%

83.7%

27.7%

16.3%


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

Internal model with observable parameters

(%)

Internal model with certain non-observable parameters

(%)

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Interest rate derivatives

195.7

97.8

100.0%

100.0%

-%

-%

Foreign exchange derivatives

18.0

31.5

100.0%

100.0%

-%

-%

Other derivative instruments including commodity derivatives

35.3

25.2

72.2%

4.8%

27.8%

95.2%

Total derivative instruments

249.0

154.5

96.1%

84.5%

3.9%

15.5%




F-85



Back to Contents


30.1.1

Management of interest rate risk management


The Group’s exposure to interest rate risk is mainly attributable to its net financial debt. The Group manages a structural fixed/floating rate position in order to limit the impact of interest rate fluctuations on its net income and to optimize the cost of debt. For this purpose, it uses firm and optional interest rate swap instruments (swaps, caps, floors, etc.).


and swaption instruments.

The fair value of interest rate derivatives recognized in the balance sheet breaks down as follows:


(€ million)

 

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

Note

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Notes

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

(€ million)

Note

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

 

195.7

97.8

338.0

159.7

71.1

113.0

80.9

77.4

195.7

97.8

Fair value hedges

a-1

164.7

2.5

286.0

-

30.1.1.1

21.2

48.9

45.2

16.3

164.7

2.5

Cash flow hedges

a-2

-

88.6

0.5

82.4

30.1.1.2

11.8

41.0

6.8

48.4

-

88.6

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

a-3

31.0

6.7

51.5

77.3

30.1.1.3


38.1


23.1

28.9

12.7

31.0

6.7


The financing structure of the Group exposes it naturally to the risk of interest rate fluctuations. As such, fixed ratefixed-rate debt is exposed to a risk of change in fair value if repurchased on the market, while floating-rate debt exposesimpacts future financial results.

Short-term debt is primarily indexed to short-term indexes (Eonia for the treasury note program and Euribor/Libor for the main short-term credit lines). The medium-Medium and long-term debt comprises both fixed-fixed and floating- rate debt. Borrowings are primarily denominated in euro, pound sterling, USU.S. dollar, Czech crown, renminbi and Polish zloty.




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-31



BackExposure to contents


Fixed/interest rate risk: fixed/floating rate breakdown of gross debtdebt:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Outstanding

% total debt

Outstanding

% total debt

(€ million)

Out-
standing

% total debt

Out-
standing

% total debt

Out-
standing

% total debt

10,586.5

65.3%

9,651.4

54.8%

12,129.7

66.5%

11,290.6

65.1%

10,586.5

65.3%

Floating rate

5,619.0

34.7%

7,966.6

45.2%

6,111.0

33.5%

6,042.3

34.9%

5,619.0

34.7%

Total before hedging

16,205.5

100.0%

17,618.0

100.0%

18,240.7

100.0%

17,332.9

100,0%

16,205.5

100.0%

Fixed rate

8,494.8

52.4%

7,166.8

40.7%

9,786.9

53.6%

9,119.8

52.6%

8,494.8

52.4%

Capped floating rate

1,751.0

10.8%

1,989.7

11.3%

Capped floating rate (active caps)

1,401.7

7.7%

1,862.6

10.8%

1,751.0

10.8%

Floating rate

5,959.7

36.8%

8,461.5

48.0%

7,052.1

38.7%

6,350.5

36.6%

5,959.7

36.8%

Total after hedging

16,205.5

100.0%

17,618.0

100.0%

18,240.7

100.0%

17,332.9

100.0%

16,205.5

100.0%

Fair value adjustments to hedging derivatives

162.3

 

284.0

 

(27.7)

 

28.8

 

162.3

 

Total Long- and short-term borrowings

16,367.8

 

17,902.0

 

18,213.0

 

17,361.7

 

16,367.8

 


Total gross debt as of December 31, 20052007 after hedging was 52.4%61.3% fixed-rate and 47.6% floating-rate, including 10.8%(including 7.7% at capped floating rates.rates) and 38.7% floating-rate. As of December 31, 2005, the exercise price of US2007, all U.S. dollar and euro caps in the notional amount of USD 650€1,402 million (€551were active.

The Group has cash and cash equivalents of €3,115.6 million euro equivalent) was inas of December 31, 2007, the money.majority of which bears interest at floating rates.

Net debt after hedging is 74.0% fixed-rate (including 9.3% at capped floating rates) and 26.0% floating-rate.



F-86



Back to Contents


Sensitivity of financial expenses:the Income Statement and equity:

The Group manages its exposure to interest rate fluctuations based on floating-rate gross debt net of cash.

The break downbreakdown of the Group’s floating-rate debt by maturity is as follows:

(€ million)

Overnight
and less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total

Total assets (cash and cash equivalents)

2,336.1

-

-

2,336.1

Total floating-rate liabilities

(2,645.0)

(2,429.3)

(544.6)

(5,618.9)

Net position before hedging

(308.9)

(2,429.3)

(544.6)

(3,282.8)

Derivative financial instruments (*)

236.0

255.3

(2,032.1)

(1,540.8)

Total position before euro caps

(72.9)

(2,174.0)

(2,576.7)

(4,823.6)

Euro caps (**)

-

-

1,200.0

1,200.0

Net total

(72.9)

(2,174.0)

(1,376.7)

(3,623.6)

(*) Hedging financial instruments excluding euro caps with an exercise price out

(€ million)

Overnight and less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total

Total assets (cash and cash equivalents)

3,115.6

-

-

3,115.6

Total floating-rate liabilities

(4,264.3)

(1,180.2)

(666.5)

(6,111.0)

Net floating-rate position before active management

(1,148.7)

(1,180.2)

(666.5)

(2,995.4)

Derivative financial instruments*

-

1,237.3

(2,178.4)

(941.1)

Net floating-rate position after active management and hedging

(1,148.7)

57.1

(2,844.9)

(3,936.5)

*

Hedging financial instruments excluding caps that are out of the money of €82.6 million (primarily CZK-denominated caps).

The analysis of the moneysensitivity of finance costs to interest rate risk covers financial assets and liabilities and the derivative portfolio as of December 31, 2005.

(**) Euro caps included in hedging derivatives (€1,200 million) have an exercise price of 3.5%.


Floating-rate debt maturing within less than one year is to a large extent hedged by excess cash balances invested at short-term rates. Floating-rate2007. Given the net debt is therefore €4,824 million (euro equivalent), that is 34.8%structure of totalthe Group and its derivative portfolio, a change in interest rates would impact the income statement via the cost of floating-rate debt, (including 8.7% capped at 3.5% - see above). As such, 65.2%the fair value of net debt is at fixedtrading derivatives and Group investments.

The analysis of the sensitivity of equity to interest rate risk concerns the cash flow hedge reserve. The impact on equity corresponds to fair value movements in the cash flow hedge derivatives market as a result of an instantaneous change in interest rates. Taking into account the impact of caps the percentage of fixed-rate debt increases to 73.9%.


Assuming a constant net debt structure and management policy, a 1%an increase in interest rates of 0.5% at the balance sheet date would generate an increase in annual financial expenses, excluding market impacts,equity of €48€38.9 million (before tax) and a decrease in net income (before tax) of €15.0 million. A decrease in interest rates of 0.5% would have the opposite impact on net income and equity.  


All other variables have been assumed to be constant for the purpose of this analysis and the change in net income and equity is attributable to the variation in interest rates, all other things being equal.

Hedge derivatives:

Derivative instruments may be classified as fair value hedges or cash flow hedges. An interest rate fair value hedge changes fixed-rate financial assets or liabilities into floating rate financial assets or liabilities in order to protect against changes in their fair value. A cash flow hedge protects against changes in the value of cash flows associated with assets or liabilities.

The hedging relationship is clearly defined and documented onat the inception.

The effectiveness of the hedging relationship is demonstrated onat the inception and throughout its term.


30.1.1.1

a-1

Interest rate fair value hedges


The risk of volatility in the value of debt is hedged by fixed-rate receiver/floating-rate payer swaps which change bond issues to floating-rate debt (see note 20)Note 18).



F-87



Back to Contents


Fair value hedging swaps represent notional outstandings of €2,588€3,808.8 million as of December 31, 2005,2007, with a net fair value of €162.3€27.7 million in the balance sheet as follows.follows:


Fixed-rate receiver/floating-rate payer swaps

Notional contract amount by maturity

Fair value of derivative instruments

(€ million)

Total

Less than
1 year

1 to 5 years

More than
5 years

Total non-
current assets

Total non-
current
liabilities

As of December 31, 2005

2,587.6

35.2

707.3

1,845.0

164.7 

2.5

As of December 31, 2004

4,625.7

740.7

1,872.9

2,012.1

286.0*

-


* including €2 million of fair value derivative instruments in Divisions.

Fixed-rate receiver / floating-rate payer swaps

Notional contract amount by maturity

Fair value of derivative instruments

(€ million)

Total

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5years

Total assets

Total liabilities

As of December 31, 2007

3,808.8

499.7

600.0

2,709.1

21.2

48.9

As of December 31, 2006

3,308.3

49.5

499.7

2,759.1

45.2

16.3

As of December 31, 2005

2,587.5

35.2

707.3

1,845.0

164.7

2.5


The reductionincrease in the fair value hedging portfolio is mainly due to:

·-

the partial cancellation (€1,150 million)hedging of the swap hedgingEMTN Series 17 issue, maturing February 2016, in the 2008 EMTN issue following its partial redemption on the market;amount of €100 million;

·-

the expiryhedging of the €500 million swapEMTN Series 18 issue, maturing December 2020, in the amount of €200 million;

-

the hedging of the EMTN Series 21 issue, maturing November 2005;January 2017, in the amount of €400 million;

·-

the cancellation of the €2503 swaps totaling €130 million, swap hedging the EMTN issue maturing May 2018.USPP program.


30.1.1.2

a-2

Cash flow hedges


Cash flow hedges comprise floating-ratefloating–rate receiver/fixed-rate payer swaps and purchases of caps, which fix the interest payable on floating-rate debt, mainly secured to finance BOT (Build Operate Transfer) contracts.


Floating-rate receiver/fixed-rate payer swaps

Notional contract amount by maturity

Fair value of derivatives instruments

Floating-rate receiver / fixed-rate payer swaps / purchases of caps

Notional contract amount by maturity

Fair value of derivative instruments

(€ million)

Total

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total non-current assets

Total non-current liabilities

Total

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

As of December 31, 2007

1,715.3

305.9

811.1

598.3

11.8

41.0

As of December 31, 2006

1,476.5

94.6

1,072.2

309.7

6.8

48.4

As of December 31, 2005

792.0

251.2

 241.9

 298.9

-

88.6

792.0

251.2

241.9

298.9

-

88.6

As of December 31, 2004

682.8

32.8

428.4

 221.6

0.5

82.4


-58.814.3 million, net of tax, was recorded directly in equity (fair value reserves) in respect of these derivative instrumentscash flow hedge interest-rate derivatives as of December 31, 2005.2007.


Contractual flows associated with interest rate swaps are paid at the same time as contractual flows in respect of floating-rate borrowings and the amount recorded in equity is released to net income in the period in which interest flows on the debt impact the Income Statement.

The increase in the cash-flow hedging portfolio is mainly due to:

-

the maturity of several lines totaling just under €100 million;

-

the set-up of new hedging transactions for €100 million

-

the increase in the nominal amount of hedges covering project debt by €50 million;

-

transactions of companies purchased in 2007 for €180 million.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-32F-88



Back to contentsContents


a-330.1.1.3

Interest rateInterest-rate derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting


A certain number of derivative instrument used in the Veolia Environnement Group management policy areinstruments do not qualifiedqualify as hedges under IAS 32 and 39. The Group does not, however, consider these transactions to be of a speculative nature and views them as necessary tofor the effective management of its exposure.exposure to interest rate risk.


 

Notional amounts as of December 31, 2005

Fair value of derivative instruments

(€ million)

Total

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

Fixed-rate receiver/floating-rate payer swaps

752.8

-

2.1

750.7

6.4

0.5

Floating-rate receiver/fixed-rate payer swaps

298.2

-

259.7

38.5

-

4.5

Floating-rate receiver/floating-rate payer swaps

866.0

211.9

654.1

-

0.4

-

Total firm financial instruments

1,917.0

211.9

915.9

789.2

6.8

5.0

Purchases of caps

2,533.3

-

1,321.1

1,212.2

24.2

1.7

Sales of caps (*)

769.0

-

769.0

-

-

-

Total optional  financial instruments

3,302.3

-

2,090.1

1,212.2

24.2

1.7

Total derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

5,219.3

211.9

3,006.0

2,001.4

31.0

6.7


 

Notional amounts as of December 31, 2004

Fair value of derivative instruments

(€ million)

Total

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

Fixed-rate receiver/floating-rate payer swaps

139.6

-

-

139.6

5.5

-

Floating-rate receiver/fixed-rate payer swaps

1,257.1

-

867.8

389.3

4.9

69.3

Floating-rate receiver/floating-rate payer swaps

342.8

154.5

188.3

-

0.1

1.7

Currency swaps

190.4

-

190.4

-

24.1

0.2

Total firm financial instruments

1,929.9

154.5

1,246.5

528.9

34.6

71.2

Purchases of caps

2,005.3

161.4

950.2

893.7

16.9

-

Sales of caps (*)

765.7

-

765.7

-

-

0.3

Sales of swap options

183.5

-

183.5

-

-

5.8

Total optional  financial instruments

2,954.5

161.4

1,899.4

893.7

16.9

6.1

Total derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

4,884.4

315.9

3,145.9

1,422.6

51.5

77.3

(*) Sales of caps are backed in the amount of €700 million to purchases of caps with the same exercise price and maturity and do not therefore impact net income.

(€ million)


Notional amounts as of December 31, 2007

Fair value of derivative instruments

Total

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

Fixed-rate receiver / floating-rate payer swaps

325.0

5.0

20.6

299.4

-

17.9

Floating-rate receiver / fixed-rate payer swaps

513.8

318.9

150.0

44.9

3.4

0.2

Floating-rate receiver / floating-rate payer swaps

150.0

-

-

150.0

0.7

-

Total firm financial instruments

988.8

323.9

170.6

494.3

4.1

18.1

Purchases of vanilla and structured caps

1,253.2

144.0

909.2

200.0

34.0

-

Sales of caps

75.1

75.1

-

-

-

-

Sales of swaptions

200.0

-

-

200.0

-

5.0

Total optional financial instruments

1,528.3

219.1

909.2

400.0

34.0

5.0

Total interest-rate derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

2,517.1

543.0

1,079.8

894.3

38.1

23.1


Sensitivity of financial expenses

The decrease in the portfolio of interest rate derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting generatesis mainly due to:

-

the arrival at maturity of financial instruments with a certain volatility in net financial income.nominal value of €2,300 million (including caps of  €1,400 million);

As-

the early unwinding of December 31, 2005, €300 million of options;

-

the sensitivityset-up of the portfolio to a change in interest rates is as follows:

·

a 0.25% increase in theapproximately €450 million of new instruments (including short-term interest rate would generate additional financial expenses of €1.3 million.swaps hedging the treasury note program).

·

(€ million)



Notional amounts as of December 31, 2006

Fair value of derivative instruments

Total

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

Fixed-rate receiver / floating-rate payer swaps

336.8

-

8.1

328.7

-

1.0

Floating-rate receiver / fixed-rate payer swaps

281.3

239.3

-

42.0

0.6

0.8

Floating-rate receiver / floating-rate payer swaps

803.2

652.0

1.2

150.0

0.8

8.8

Total firm financial instruments

1,421.3

891.3

9.3

520.7

1.4

10.6

Purchases of caps

2,263.7

700.0

753.6

810.1

27.5

-

Sales of caps (*)

772.8

700.0

72.8

-

-

-

Sales of swaptions

200.0

-

-

200.0

-

2.1

Total optional financial instruments

3,236.5

1,400.0

826.4

1,010.1

27.5

2.1

Total interest-rate derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

4,657.8

2,291.3

835.7

1,530.8

28.9

12.7

(*)

Sales of caps are backed in the amount of €700 million by purchases of caps with the same exercise price and maturity and which do not therefore impact net income.


a 0.25% decrease in the interest rate would generate a reduction in financial expenses of €1.5 million.

F-89



Back to Contents


(b)

(€ million)



Notional amounts as of December 31, 2005

Fair value of derivative instruments

Total

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

Fixed-rate receiver / floating-rate payer swaps

752.8

-

2.1

750.7

6.4

0.5

Floating-rate receiver / fixed-rate payer swaps

298.2

-

259.7

38.5

-

4.5

Floating-rate receiver / floating-rate payer swaps

866.0

211.9

654.1

-

0.4

-

Total firm financial instruments

1,917.0

211.9

915.9

789.2

6.8

5.0

Purchases of caps

2,533.3

-

1,321.1

1,212.2

24.2

1.7

Sales of caps (*)

769.0

-

769.0

-

-

-

Sales of swaptions

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total optional financial instruments

3,302.3

-

2,090.1

1,212.2

24.2

1.7

Total derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

5,219.3

211.9

3,006.0

2,001.4

31.0

6.7

(*)

Sales of caps are backed in the amount of €700 million by purchases of caps with the same exercise price and maturity and which do not therefore impact net income.

30.1.2

Management of Foreignforeign exchange risk


The Group’sGroup's international activities performed in nearly 65 countries, generate significant foreign currency flows. The Group is mainly exposed to foreign exchange risk on its balance sheet “assets” position. The Group’s trading activities do not expose it to significant exchange rate risk.


The Group’sGroup's central treasury department manages foreign exchange risk centrally within limits set by the Chief FinancialExecutive Officer. The Group uses derivative instruments to hedge its exposure to foreign exchange risk (currency swaps, cross currency swaps, currency options, currency forwards).

The fair value of foreign exchange derivatives recognized in the balance sheet breaks down as follows:


(€ million)

 

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

Note

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Notes

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

(€ million)

Note

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

 

18.0

31.5

82.3

30.1

105.2

49.2

56.5

42.7

18.0

31.5

Net investment hedges

b-1

13.9

0.3

71.9

-

Net investment hedge

30.1.2.1

78.3

13.6

42.0

4.3

13.9

0.3

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

b-2

4.1

13.2

10.4

10.1

30.1.2.2

26.9

11.8

14.5

4.1

13.2

Embedded derivatives

b-3

-

18.0

-

20.0

30.1.2.3

-

23.8

-

34.3

-

18.0


Management of foreign exchange transaction riskrisk:

One of the specific characteristics of environmental services is that they bear littleThe Group has no significant exposure to foreign exchange transaction risk. Income and expenses are mainly denominated in the currency of the country where the Group operates.  However, optional hedges may be negotiated with the front office when responding to a call for tenders, prior to obtaining the definitive contract.


Management of foreign exchange asset risk:

Financing is secured in the local currency for operations located in foreign countries. In the case of inter-company financing, these credit lines can generate foreign exchange risk. In order to limit the impact of this risk, Veolia Environnement has developed a policy which seeks to back foreign-currency financing and foreign-currency derivatives with inter-company receivables denominated in the same currency.


The asset exposure hedging strategy primarily involves ensuring that Group companies do not have a material balance sheet foreign exchange position that could generate significant volatility in foreign exchange gains and losses and hedging certain net foreign investments (IAS 21/21 / IAS 39), and notably inter-company loans designated as loans and receivables forming part of a net investment.


.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-33F-90



Back to contentsContents


b-130.1.2.1

Hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation


DerivativeFinancial instruments designated as net investment hedges break down as follows:


(€ million)

Notional amount as of December 31, 2005 by currency and maturity

Fair value of derivative instruments

Notional amount as of December 31, 2007 by currency and maturity

Fair value of derivative instruments

Financial instruments

Currency

Amount

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

Financial instrument

Currency

Amount

Less than 1year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

Currency payer swaps

HKD

50.0

50.0

-

-

3.7

-

JPY

35.5

35.5

-

-

0.2

-

MXN

1.2

1.2

-

-

0.1

-

PLN

82.7

82.7

-

-

-

0.3

GBP

272.7

272.7

-

-

-

0.8

NOK

86.1

86.1

-

-

1.9

-

AUD

7.2

7.2

-

-

0.1

-

HKD

13.3

13.3

-

-

-

0.3

USD

451.2

451.2

-

-

1.7

-

PLN

76.8

76.8

-

-

0.2

-

SKK

76.5

76.5

-

-

0.3

-

Embedded derivatives (forward sale)

KRW

100.3

17.8

57.3

25.2

5.2

-

KRW

66.5

15.9

48.1

2.5

7.8

-

Cross currency swaps: floating rate payer/floating rate receiver

HKD

44.8

44.8

-

-

1.0

-

USD

299.0

-

299.0

-

5.5

-

Cross currency swaps: fixed-rate payer / fixed-rate receiver

CNY

116.2

57.8

58.4

0.2

12.5

Cross currency swaps: floating rate payer / floating rate receiver

USD

234.9

234.9

-

-

64.2

-

Total currency derivatives

 

620.3

238.8

356.3

25.2

13.8

0.3

 

1,394.6

1,227.8

105.9

60.9

78.3

13.6

USPP borrowings

USD

302.6

-

 

302.6

N/A

N/A

USD

247.1

-

18.3

228.8

N/A

N/A

GBP borrowings

GBP

681.8

-

-

681.8

N/A

N/A

Syndicated loan

CZK

211.6

-

211.6

-

N/A

N/A

CZK

189.2

-

189.2

-

N/A

N/A

Total financing

 

514.2

-

211.6

302.6

N/A

N/A

 

1,118.1

-

207.5

910.6

-

-


The above currency swaps are short-term but are generally renewed at maturity, until financing of an appropriate term is secured in the currency of the related country.

Fair value movements compared with December 31, 2006 are mainly due to:

-

the set-up of a EUR/CYN cross-currency swap for -€12.3 million;

-

the change in the fair value of the KRW embedded derivative for €5 million;

-

the change in the fair value of USD cross currency swaps for €28 million;

In addition, the change in the portfolio (loans and payer swaps) is mainly linked to the financing of new Group assets in the United Kingdom and the United States.




F-91



Back to Contents



(€ million)

Notional amount as of December 31, 2004 by currency and maturity

Fair value of derivative instruments

Notional amount as of December 31, 2006 by currency and maturity

Fair value of derivative instruments

Financial instruments

Currency

Amount

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

Financial instrument

Currency

Amount

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

Currency payer swaps

HKD

55.9

55.9

-

-

2.1

-

JPY

14.5

14.5

-

-

0.1

-

MXN

1.4

1.4

-

-

-

-

PLN

78.3

78.3

-

-

0.8

-

SKK

112.7

112.7

-

-

0.1

4.3

Embedded derivatives (forward sale)

KRW

116.8

16.5

62.6

37.7

20.3

 

KRW

82.5

15.9

52.8

13.8

2.7

-

Cross currency swaps: floating rate receiver/floating rate payer

HKD

44.8

 

44.8

 

6.9

 

USD

299.0

 

299.0

 

44.7

 

Cross currency swaps: floating rate payer/floating rate receiver

USD

299.1

-

299.1

-

36.2

-

Total currency derivatives

 

460.6

16.5

406.4

37.7

71.9

  

644.4

278.7

351.9

13.8

42.0

4.3

USPP borrowings

USD

262.0

 

262.0

N/A

N/A

USD

285.1

-

285.1

N/A

N/A

Syndicated loan

CZK

216.6

 

216.6

 

N/A

N/A

CZK

203.9

-

203.9

-

N/A

N/A

Total financing

 

478.6

 

216.6

262.0

N/A

N/A

 

489.0

-

203.9

285.1

N/A

N/A


(€ million)

Notional amount as of December 31, 2005 by currency and maturity

Fair value of derivative instruments

Financial instrument

Currency

Amount

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

Currency payer swaps

NOK

86.1

86.1

-

-

1.9

-

HKD

13.3

13.3

-

-

-

0.3

PLN

76.8

76.8

-

-

0.3

-

Embedded derivatives (forward sale)

KRW

100.3

17.8

57.3

25.2

5.2

-

Cross currency swaps: floating rate payer / floating rate receiver

HKD

44.8

44.8

-

-

1.0

-

USD

299.0

-

299.0

-

5.5

-

Total currency derivatives

 

620.3

238.8

356.3

25.2

13.9

0.3

USPP borrowings

USD

302.6

-

-

302.6

N/A

N/A

Syndicated loan

CZK

211.6

-

211.6

-

N/A

N/A

Total financing

 

514.2

-

211.6

302.6

N/A

N/A




F-92



Back to Contents


Inter-company loans and receivables forming part of a foreign investment (IAS 21) are nearly systematically hedged by foreign currency external financing or currency derivatives (cross currency swaps, currency forwards) meeting IAS 39 criteria for hedge accounting. Foreign exchange gains and losses recorded in foreign exchange translation reserves in respect of hedging instruments are systematically offset by foreign exchange gains and losses recognized in foreign exchange translation reserves on loans forming part of the net investment, unless:

-

the inter-company loan forming part of the net investment in a foreign operation is not hedged;

-

the hedge is ineffective due to a difference between the nominal amount of the hedge and the amount of the hedged net asset;

-

only the net assets of the foreign subsidiary (excluding the loan forming part of the net investment) are hedged.


Net foreign exchange losses recorded in foreign exchange translation reserves as of December 31, 20052007 of €35€36.8 million mainly comprise:

-

a foreign exchange lossesloss of €11 million on an unhedged USU.S. dollar inter-company loan forming part of a net investment (IAS 21), capitalized in December 2004;

-

the impact of exchange rate fluctuations for an amounton hedges of €23 million coming from investment hedges in the Water Division investments in China, the Czech Republic.Republic and the United States of -€20.2 million;


-

b-2the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on hedges of Energy Services Division investments in Poland of -€4.9 million.

30.1.2.2

Hedging of balance sheet foreign exchange exposure by derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting


Each month, theThe Group determines its foreign exchange position and enters into hedging transactions once it has quantified its foreign exchange exposure and notably the overall foreign exchange position. Currency derivatives hedging the overall balance sheet foreign exchange position are accounted for as trading transactions, with fair value movements recognized directly in net income.


The portfolio of currency derivativesdo not qualifyingqualify for hedge accounting comprises currency forwardsunder IAS 39. The Group does not, however, consider these transactions to be of a speculative nature and currency options with a maturityviews them as necessary for the effective management of less than one year:its exposure to foreign exchange risk.


Notional

As of December 31, 2005

 

As of December 31, 2004

Fair value

As of December 31, 2007

(€ million)

Total

USD

GBP

PLN

NOK

SEK

Other

 

Total

USD

GBP

PLN

NOK

SEK

Other

Total

USD

GBP

Other

Forward purchases

39.7

15.9

13.1

10.7

 

54.9

25.6

24.2

 -

5.1

(4.2)

(4.5)

(0.1)

0.4

Currency receiver swaps

(1.8)

-

-

(1.8)

Total currency swaps and forward purchases

(6.0)

(4.5)

(0.1)

(1.4)

Forward sales

48.8

34.9

1.8

12.1

 

24.1

5.1

14.9

 -

4.1

9.2

10.2

-

(1.0)

Total currency forwards

88.5

50.8

14.9

-

22.8

 

79.0

30.7

39.1

-

9.2

Currency receiver swaps

98.7

12.1

0.6

1.3

0.8

1.1

82.8

 

114.0

9.6

21.9

 

1.4

81.1

Currency payer swaps

1,428.1

317.9

602.1

168.4

46.8

91.3

 201.6

 

1,529.2  

587.0

430.2

134.6

118.0

98.2

161.2

11.5

5.1

3.2

3.2

Total currency swaps

1,526.8

330.0

602.7

169.7

47.6

92.4

 284.4

 

1,643.2

596.6

452.1

134.6

118.0

99.6

 242.3

Total currency swaps and forward sales

20.7

15.3

3.2

2.2

Call options

-

 

 

3.2

3.2

(0.4)

(0.4)

-

-

Put options

3.6

3.6

 

4.0

4.0

0.8

0.8

-

-

Total currency options

3.6

3.6

-

-

-

 

7.2

7.2

-

-

0.4

0.4

-

-

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting (*)

15.1

11.2

3.1

0.8

(*)

Net fair value (Assets–Liabilities) excluding embedded derivatives.

(*)

Net fair value (Assets–Liabilities) excluding embedded derivatives.


Fair value

As of December 31, 2005

 

As of December 31, 2004

(€ million)

Total

USD

GBP

PLN

NOK

SEK

Other

 

Total

USD

GBP

PLN

NOK

SEK

Other

Forward purchases

(1.8)

(1.6)

-

-

-

-

(0.2)

 

(3.4)

(3.1)

-

-

-

-

(0.3)

Currency receiver swaps

(0.3)

0.4

-

-

-

-

(0.7)

 

(0.6)

(1.0)

(0.3)

-

-

-

0.7

Total currency swaps and forward purchases

(2.1)

(1.2)

-

-

-

-

(0.9)

 

(4.0)

(4.1)

(0.3)

-

-

-

0.4

Forward sales

(1.6)

(1.4)

-

-

-

-

(0.2)

 

-

0.5

(0.5)

-

-

-

-

Currency payer swaps

(5.4)

(5.3)

1.5

-

(0.1)

(0.1)

(1.4)

 

4.3

2.0

1.5

(3.3)

2.0

0.7

1.4

Total currency swaps and forward sales

(7.0)

(6.7)

1.5

-

(0.1)

(0.1)

(1.6)

 

4.3

2.5

1.0

(3.3)

2.0

0.7

1.4

Total derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting (*)

(9.1)

(7.9)

1.5

-

(0.1)

(0.1)

(2.5)

 

0.3

(1.6)

0.7

(3.3)

2.0

0.7

1.8

(*) Net fair value (Assets-Liabilities) excluding embedded derivatives

F-93



Back to Contents



Fair value

As of December 31, 2006

(€ million)

Total

USD

GBP

Other

Forward purchases

(1.5)

(1.6)

-

0.1

Currency receiver swaps

0.7

 

-

0.7

Total currency swaps and forward purchases

(0.8)

(1.6)

-

0.8

Forward sales

0.6

0.3

-

0.3

Currency payer swaps

10.6

8.5

0.7

1.4

Total currency swaps and forward sales

11.2

8.8

0.7

1.7

Put options

-

-

-

-

Total currency options

-

-

-

-

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting (*)

10.4

7.2

0.7

2.5

(*) Net fair value (Assets–Liabilities) excluding embedded derivatives.



Fair value

As of December 31, 2005

(€ million)

Total

USD

GBP

Other

Forward purchases

(1.8)

(1.6)

-

(0.2)

Currency receiver swaps

(0.3)

0.4

-

(0.7)

Total currency swaps and forward purchases

(2.1)

(1.2)

-

(0.9)

Forward sales

(1.6)

(1.4)

-

(0.2 )

Currency payer swaps

(5.4)

(5.3)

1.5

(1.6)

Total currency swaps and forward sales

(7.0)

(6.7)

1.5

(1.8)

Put options

-

-

-

-

Total currency options

-

-

-

-

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting (*)

(9.1)

(7.9)

1.5

(2.7)

(*) Net fair value (Assets–Liabilities) excluding embedded derivatives.


The above portfolio of currency derivatives was mainly contracted by Veolia Environnement SA (holding company) to hedge its foreign currency denominatedcurrency-denominated net debt (comprising foreign currency borrowings and foreign currency denominatedcurrency-denominated inter-company loans and borrowings), and to reduce its sensitivity to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates..




30.1.2.3

VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-34



Back to contents


Embedded derivatives

The following table presents a break down of the foreign exchange exposure as of December 31, 2005 of Veolia Environnement SA’s foreign currency denominated net debt, taking into account currency derivatives:  


 

VE Holding company
foreign currency denominated
net debt

Open position
in € million

Impact of a 10%
change in exchange
rates against the euro

GBP

6.6

9.6

1.0

PLN

30.1

7.8

0.8

USD

4.1

3.5

0.3

SEK

23.9

2.5

0.3

Other (€ million equivalent)

(3.4)

(3.4)

(0.4)

Total

NA

20.0

2.0


The above table shows that a 10% increase in all foreign currencies against the euro would generate foreign exchange gains of €2 million.


b-3

Embedded derivatives


The Korean embedded derivatives are related toconcern Water treatment contracts with Korean industrial customers. The contracts feature clauses of indexation on the dollar andindexing to the euro or U.S. dollar, while the operationaloperating expenses are in Korean won.



F-94



Back to Contents


(c)30.1.2.4

Overall exposure to foreign exchange risk and sensitivity of the income statement and equity

The foreign exchange risk as defined in accordance with IFRS7 is mainly arising from receivables and payables not denominated in the functional currency of an entity.

As a consequence, the foreign exchange exposure within the Group are coming from :

(a)

the loan/debt denominated in foreign currency and the related derivatives instruments (currency swap for instance),

(b)

the transactions on the operating activity and the related derivatives instruments used. These transactions are limited within the Group since the activities of the Group are performed by subsidiaries operating in their own country and their own currency. Operating exposure to foreign exchange risk is therefore naturally limited.

The following tables summarizes Group exposure to exchange rate movements by main currency: 


(€ million)



As of December 31, 2007

EUR

USD

GBP

CNY

CZK

KRW

Other

Balance sheet position before management

(65.9)

531.2

241.5

(1.6)

(183.6)

-

946.0

Off-balance sheet position (1)

-

(588.0)

(178.9)

0,0

150.0

(131.4)

(901.7)

Position after management

(65.9)

(56.8)

62.6

(1.6)

(33.6)

(131.4)

44.3

(1)

The off-balance sheet position corresponds to the notional amount of derivative instruments set-up to hedge balance sheet exposure and embedded derivatives sensitive to foreign exchange risk.


Exposure to the euro position after management mainly corresponds to euro-denominated debt carried by a Romanian subsidiary, exposure to the USD to USD financing in countries such as China and the Middle East, exposure to the GBP to dividend payments (position hedged at the beginning of January 2008) and exposure to the KRW to the aforementioned Korean embedded derivative.

Taken into account the policy of the Group, the sensitivity of the net income to a change in the currency rate as of December 31, 2007 remains quite limited. An instantaneous 10% increasein the three main currencies against the euro representing the principal exposures of the Group would have an impact of -€14.9 million on net income.

(€ million)


As of December 31, 2007

USD

GBP

KRW

Net income (1)

Equity

Net income (1)

Equity

Net income (1)

Equity

Impact

(7.3)

na

+6.3

na

(13.9)

na

(1)

before tax.




F-95



Back to Contents


30.1.3

Management of commodity risk


30.1.3.1

Fuel and electricity risks

Fuel prices can be subject to significant fluctuations. Nonetheless, Veolia Environnement’sEnvironnement's activities have not been materially affected and should not be materially affected in the future by the cost increases or the availability of fuel or other commodities, as the contracts entered into by Veolia Environnement generally include price review and/or indexation clauses which enable it to pass on the majority of any increases in commodity or fuel prices to the price of services sold to customers, even if this may be performed with a time delay.


As part of their suppliessupply management and costscost optimization, certain Group’s structuresGroup subsidiaries may be required, depending on their activities, to contract forward purchases or sales of electricity.electricity or heavy fuel and diesel swaps to fix the cost of refined petroleum supplies. The accounting treatment of such forward contracts is describeddisclosed in note 1.22. Notes 1.14 and 1.24.

As of December 31, 2005, related2007, the fair value of related derivative instruments totaled €33.8€60.6 million in assets and €25.2€35.6 million in liabilities and did not qualify for hedge accounting. These contractsTransactions mainly concern commitmentsoptions to purchase electricity between 2006held by the company carrying the Braunschweig contract and 2013 for an amountcovering the period 2007 to 2025 of €322.5€44.8 million, based on year end measurementperiod-end valuation assumptions basis and commitments to sell electricity between 2006 and 2009 for an amountcovering the period 2007 to 2011 of €192.5€15.4 million, based on the same measurement assumptions basis in accordance with the following schedule:valuation assumptions.

Contract notional amounts are as follows:


 

Notional amount of contracts by maturity

(€ million)

Amount

Less than
1 year

1 to 5 years

More than
5 years

Purchase commitments

322.5

73.5

179.3

69.7

Sale commitments

192.5

74.3

118.2

-

(€ million)

Notional contract amount as of

December 31, 2007 by date and maturity

Total

Less than one year

1 to 5 years

More than five years

Electricity purchase options:

in Gwh

15,280

935.2

3,445

10,900

 

in € million

749.6

50.3

169.3

530.0

Electricity sales commitments:

in Gwh

3,202

1,032

2,170

-

 

in € million

177.1

55.7

121.4

-



(€ million)

Notional contract amount as of

December 31, 2006 by date and maturity

Total

Less than one year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Electricity purchase options:

in Gwh

16,511

886

3,501

12,124

 

in € million

717.0

37.5

150.3

529.2

Electricity sales commitments:

in Gwh

 3,811

876

2,935

-

 

in € million

184.4

39.3

145.1

-


A 10% increase or decrease in the price of electricity (all other things being equal) would have an impact on net income of +€5 million and -€5 million, respectively.

30.1.3.2

Greenhouse gas emission rights

Other transactions not qualifying for hedge accounting relate to contracts swapping greenhouse gas emission rights for Carbon Emission certificates, maturing at the end of 2007. These transactions are recorded in balance sheet assets for a net carrying amount of €8.1 million. (see Note 42)



(d)F-96



Back to Contents


30.1.4

Management of equity risk


As of December 31, 2005,2007, Veolia Environnement held 15,990,24215,120,654 of its own shares with a market value of €611.5€944.3 million including €453and a net carrying amount of €455.4 million offset againstdeducted from equity.


As part of theits cash management strategy, Veolia Environnement holds UCITS shares. ThoseThese UCITS are considered ashave the characteristics of monetary UCITS and are not subject to equity risks.risk.


(E)30.1.5

Management of counterparty risk


The Group minimizes counterparty risk through internal control procedures limiting the choice of counterparties to leading banks and financial institutions (banks and financial institutions with a minimum Moody’s, Standard & Poor’sPoor's or Fitch’sFitch's rating of A1/P1/F1 respectively for transactions with a term of less than one year and of A2/A/A respectively for transactions with a term of more than one year). Limits are determined for each counterparty based primarily on the rating awarded by the rating agencies.


Deposit counterparty risk is managed by the Treasury and Financing Department which centralizes allthe cash surplusespositions of Group entities. In this way, the counterparty risk of entities is limited to settlement and account keeping banking activities, signature commitments and the continuation of credit lines obtained from banks with the authorization of the Group treasuryTreasury and financing department.


Financing Department.

Counterparty risk on financial transactions is monitored on an ongoing basis by the treasury and financing department back-office. The Group does not expect any counterparties to default. The Group is not exposed to any risk as a result of material concentration.


(f)30.2

Management of liquidity risk

The operational management of liquidity and short-term financing is managed by the Treasury and Financing Department.

Similarly, new financing is secured and managed centrally in order to optimize liquidity.

The Group secures financing on the bank lending market, the commercial papertreasury note market, international bond markets and international private placement markets.

The treasuryTreasury and financing departmentFinancing Department ensures the liquidity of the Group at all times, while taking into account the general conditions of the market. A liquidity report is prepared monthly and reviewed during the markets meeting.by Executive Management.



F-97


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

Veolia Environnement

  

Undrawn MT syndicated loans

4,069.0

3,500.0

Undrawn MT credit lines

725.0

915.0

Undrawn ST credit lines

250.0

643.1

Marketable securities (*)

-

1,335.2

Cash and cash equivalents

953.6

2,416.5

Subsidiaries:

  

Marketable securities

60.7

66.4

Cash and cash equivalents

1,382.5

1,218.7

Total

7,440.8

10,094.9


(*) Treasury shares no longer fall withinBack to Contents


The following table presents undiscounted contractual flows of financial liabilities, comprising principal payments and interest flows. Market data used are valid as of December 31, 2007:

(€ million)




As of December 31, 2007

Maturing in

Net carrying amount

Total contractual flows

(1)

Less than 1 year

2 years

3 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Long-term borrowings

13,948.0

13,842.0

-

637.6

3,124.3

10,080.1

o/w bond issues – publicly offered

 

8,331.4

-

43.1

1,022.5

7,265.8

o/w bond issues – private placements

 

285.1

-

-

-

285.1

Short-term borrowings

3,805.0

3,805.0

3,805.0

 

 

 

Trade payables

5,343.8

5,343.8

5,343.8

 

 

 

Other current operating payables

5,009.4

5,009.4

5,009.4

 

 

 

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

459.4

459.4

459.4

 

 

 

Interest on long- and short-term borrowings(2)

 

 

715.5

663.7

1,750.4

3,983.0

Derivative instruments - Liabilities

      

o/w interest rate derivatives

113.0

343.9

46.7

45.4

112.5

139.3

Fair value hedge

48.9

135.0

21.9

21.9

58.8

32.4

Cash flow hedge

41.0

80.6

5.5

5.1

14.2

55.8

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

23.1

128.3

19.3

18.4

39.5

51.1

o/w foreign exchange derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

35.6

11.2

8.8

1.0

1.4

-

Inflows

 

(1,160.6)

(1,128.4)

(26.8)

(5.4)

 

Outflows

 

1,171.8

1,137.2

27.8

6.8

 

o/w foreign exchange derivatives hedging a net investment

13.6

1.0

1.0

-

-

-

Inflows

 

(354.4)

(354.4)

-

-

-

Outflows

 

355.4

355.4

-

-

-

o/w commodity derivatives

35.6

-

-

-

-

-

Inflows

 

-

 

 

 

 

Outflows

 

-

 

 

 

 

Sub-total debts and liabilities

  

15,389.6

1,347.7

4,988.6

14,202.4




F-98



Back to Contents



(€ million)




As of December 31, 2007

Maturing in

Net carrying amount

Total contractual flows

(1)

Less than 1 year

2 years

3 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Derivative instruments - Assets

      

o/w interest rate derivatives

(71.1)

(89.8)

(15.6)

(11.2)

(24.7)

(38.3)

Fair value hedge

(21.2)

(43.8)

(5.0)

(4.3)

(12.8)

(21.7)

Cash flow hedge

(11.8)

(19.4)

(5.6)

(4.6)

(5.0)

(4.2)

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

(38.1)

(26.6)

(5.0)

(2.3)

(6.9)

(12.4)

o/w foreign exchange derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

(26.9)

(28.7)

(19.4)

(7.0)

(2.3)

-

Inflows

 

(1,745.9)

(1,586.5)

(102.7)

(56.7)

-

Outflows

 

1,717.2

1,567.1

95.7

54.4

 

o/w foreign exchange derivatives hedging a net investment

(78.3)

(70.3)

(70.3)

-

-

-

Inflows

 

(926.8)

(926.8)

-

-

-

Outflows

 

856.5

856.5

-

-

-

o/w commodity derivatives

(61.8)

-

-

-

-

-

Inflows

 

-

    

Outflows

 

-

    

Sub-total assets

  

(105.3)

(18.2)

(27.0)

(38.3)

Total

  

15,284.3

1,329.5

4,961.6

14,164.1

(1)

debts are presented at the year-end exchange rate

(2)

floating-rate interest is calculated at the year-end interest rate




F-99



Back to Contents


Liquid assets of the definitionGroup as of liquidity.December 31, 2007 break down as follows:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Veolia Environnement:

   

Undrawn MT syndicated loans *

4,000.0

4,000.0

4,069.0

Undrawn MT credit lines

850.0

925.0

725.0

Undrawn ST credit lines

175.0

150.0

250.0

Other financial assets (marketable securities)

-

17.6

-

Cash & cash equivalents

1,550.8

1,140.5

953.6

Subsidiaries:

 

 

 

Other financial assets (marketable securities)

-

48.9

60.7

Cash & cash equivalents

1,564.8

1,517.5

1,382.5

Total

8,140.6

7,799.5

7,440.8

*

maturing April 20, 2012


As of December 31, 2005,2007, Veolia Environnement had total liquidities of €7.4€8.1 billion, including cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities of €2.4€3.1 billion.

CentralVeolia Environnement cash surpluses (€1,551 million) are managed with a profitability objective close to that of the monetary market and avoiding exposure to capital risk byand maintaining a low level of volatility. Investment supports primarily comprise UCITS, negotiable debt instruments (certificates of deposit, etc.) and equivalent.equivalents.

In 2005,2007, the Group continued its policy of optimizing the cost and maturity of its liquidity by:liquidities. The bilateral credit lines available to VE SA in 2007 included a credit line signed with Ixis (€100 million) and a credit line granted by Natexis (€150 million). When this line arrived at maturity (November 29, 2007), it was decided to group these two bilateral credit lines within a single credit line given the merger of these two institutions. The new financing facility of €200 million was granted by Natixis and matures February 9, 2009.

The syndicated credit documentation and bilateral credit lines do not contain any events of default tied to restrictive financial covenants (such as debt payout ratios or interest coverage ratios).

30.3

refinancingManagement of credit risk

Credit risk results from the €3.5 billion syndicated loan: on April 21, 2005, Veolia Environnement signed a new 7-year €4.0 billion syndicated loanpotential inability of customers to refinancerespect their payment obligations.

Given the 5-year €3.5 billion syndicated loan set-up on February 19, 2004. In addition to extending the maturitynature of the liquidity, this refinancing securedGroup’s activities and its customers, the Group considers that credit risk is unlikely to have a significant reduction inmaterial impact.

Approximately 30% of customer outstandings currently concern public counterparties (delegating authority and public customers (excluding subscribers)), with whom credit risk is limited to the costsettlement period.

Furthermore, 29% of customer outstandings concern subscribers (water, heat networks etc.), including local authorities for approximately €1.7 billion (18% of customer outstandings), for whom recovery rates are high given the line.ongoing nature of services.



Maximum Group exposure is considered to be equal to the nominal value of financial assets, net of any impairment losses.

VEOLIA
- Form 20-F | F-35



F-100



Back to contentsContents


Financial assets maturity schedule

renegotiating

(€ million)





Note

As of December 31, 2007


Assets overdue but not impaired

 Gross carrying amount

Provisions

Net carrying amount

Assets not yet due

0-6 months

6 months - 1 year

More than 1 year

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,633.6

(6.0)

5,627.6

5,624.4

2.5

0.7

-

Trade receivables

13

9,813.7

(510.0)

9,303.7

6,005.9

2,179.3

772.7

345.8

Other current operating receivables

13

1,508.1

(75.1)

1,433.0

784.0

451.5

134.1

63.4

Other non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

572.6

(57.6)

515.0

515.0

-

-

-

Current financial assets in loans and receivables

14

174.1

(21.3)

152.8

123.3

15.7

6.2

7.6

Loans and receivables

 

17,702.1

(670.0)

17,032.1

13,052.6

2,649.0

913.7

416.8

Other non-current financial assets

11

231.0

-

231.0

231.0

-

-

-

Other current financial assets

14

177.2

-

177.2

177.2

-

-

-


Assets overdue by 6 months and not impaired (€1,330.5 million) mainly consist of trade receivables (€1,118.5 million in 2007).

Payment delays in excess of 6 months are mainly concentrated in two countries where settlement periods are exceptionally long:

In Italy, the net “trade receivables” account for all Group subsidiaries is €677 million as of December 31, 2007, for receivables past due over 6 months. This period is due to settlement practices in this country. Furthermore, in Italy, trade receivables primarily consist of a multitude of user/private customers for which the credit lines: Veolia Environnement continued negotiations aimedrisk is highly diluted and local authorities for which the recovery period is long.

In Morocco, the net “trade receivables” account is €88 million as of December 31, 2007, for receivables overdue by 6 months. Recovery action plans have been implemented with local authorities and state bodies who comprise the majority of debtors.

Finally, in France, net trade receivables overdue by 6 months total €189.6 million at extending the end of 2007, representing 3.75% of customer outstandings (including €89.2 million overdue by one year), the majority of which concern amounts invoiced on behalf of local authorities and public bodies and VAT.




F-101



Back to Contents


Financial assets maturity schedule as of existing bilateral credit lines, renewing credit lines that matureDecember 31, 2006:


(€ million)





Note

As of December 31, 2006


Assets overdue but not impaired

Gross carrying amount

Provisions

Net carrying amount

Assets not yet due

0-6 months

6 months - 1 year

More than 1 year

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,465.6

(6.0)

5,459.6

5,454.7

0.8

4.1

-

Trade receivables

13

8,939.3

(448.7)

8,490.6

5,626.0

1,764.6

802.3

297.7

Other current operating receivables

13

1,383.9

(121.7)

1,262.2

720.9

295.5

117.9

127.9

Other non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

604.8

(58.8)

546.0

546.0

-

-

-

Current financial assets in loans and receivables

14

363.3

(158.0)

205.3

118.9

79.7

4.0

2.7

Loans and receivables

 

16,756.9

(793.2)

15,963.7

12,466.5

2,140.6

928.3

428.3

Other non-current financial assets

11

91.5

-

91.5

91.5

-

-

-

Other current financial assets

14

66.4

-

66.4

57.8

8.6

-

-






F-102



Back to Contents


NOTE 31.

Additional information on financial assets and implementing new, mainly medium-term, credit lines. liabilities

Fair value measurement principles are presented in Note 1.27.

Financial assets

The average maturityfollowing schedules present the net carrying amount and fair value of these bilateral credit lines has almost doubled, increasing from just over 2 yearsGroup financial assets as of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005:

(€ million)




Note

As of December 31, 2007

Net carrying amount per IAS 39 category

Fair value

Total

Available-for-sale assets

Loans and receivables

Assets designated at fair value through profit and loss

Total

Available-for-sale assets

Loans and receivables

Assets designated at fair value through profit and loss

Non-consolidated investments

9


256.1


256.1


-


-


256.1


256.1


-


-

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10


5,627.6


-


5,627.6


-


5,666.2


-


5,666.2


-

Other non-current financial assets

11

746.0

231.0

515.0

-

746.0

231.0

515.0

-

Trade receivables

13

9,303.7

-

9,303.7

-

9,303.7

-

9,303.7

-

Other current operating receivables

13

1,433.0

-

1,433.0

-

1,433.0

-

1,433.0

-

Other current financial assets

14

330.0

177.2

152.8

-

330.0

177.2

152.8

-

Cash & cash equivalents

15


3,115.6


-


-


3,115.6


3,115.6


-


-


3,115.6

Total

 

20,812.0

664.3

17,032.1

3,115.6

20,850.6

664.3

17,070.7

3,115.6




F-103



Back to 4 years.Contents

Syndicated loan


(€ million)




Note

As of December 31, 2006

Net carrying amount per IAS 39 category

Total

Held-to- maturity assets

Available-for-sale assets

Loans and receivables

Assets designated at fair value through profit and loss

Assets at fair value through profit and loss and held for trading

Non-consolidated investments

9

181.7

 -

181.7

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,459.6

 -

5,459.6

 -

 -

Other non-current financial assets

11

637.5

 -

91.5

546.0

 -

 -

Trade receivables

13

8,490.6

 -

 -

8,490.6

 -

 -

Other current operating receivables

13

1,262.2

 -

 -

1,262.2

  

Other current financial assets

14

271.7

 -

66.4

205.3

 -

 -

Cash & cash equivalents

15

2,658.0

 -

2,658.0

-

Total

 

18,961,4

-

339,6

15,963,8

2,658.0

-


(€ million)




Note

As of December 31, 2005

Net carrying amount per IAS 39 category

Total

Held-to- maturity assets

Available-for-sale assets

Loans and receivables

Assets designated at fair value through profit and loss

Assets at fair value through profit and loss and held for trading

Non-consolidated investments

9

209.5

-

209.5

-

-

-

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,545.4

-

-

5,545.4

-

-

Other non-current financial assets

11

691.6

-

252.1

439.5

-

-

Trade receivables

13

8,006.5

  

8,006.5

  

Other current operating receivables

13

1,151.9

-

-

1,151.9

-

-

Other current financial assets

14

281.9

-

60.7

221.2

-

-

Cash & cash equivalents

15

2,336.1

-

-

-

2,336.1

-

Total

 

18,222.9

-

522.3

15,364.5

2,336.1

-



F-104



Back to Contents


Financial liabilities

The following tables schedule present the net carrying amount and bilateral credit line documentation does not contain any disruptive coveragefair value of Group financial covenants.liabilities as of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005:

(€ million)






Note

As of December 31, 2007

Net carrying amount per IAS 39 category

Fair value

Total

Liabilities at amortized cost

Liabilities designated  at fair value through profit and loss

Liabilities at fair value through profit and loss and held for trading

Total

Liabilities at amortized cost

Liabilities designated at fair value through profit and loss

Liabilities at fair value through profit and loss and held for trading

Borrowings and other financial liabilities

         

- long-term bonds

18

9,009.6

9,009.6

-

-

8,747.8

8,747.8

-

-

- other long-term borrowings

18

4,938.4

4,938.4

-

-

4,761.6

4,761.6

-

-

- short-term borrowings

19

3,805.0

3,805.0

-

-

3,805.0

3,805.0

-

-

- bank overdrafts and other cash position items

20

459.4

459.4

-

-

459.4

459.4

-

-

Other non-current debt

17

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Trade payables

13

5,343.8

5,343.8

  

5,343.8

5,343.8

-

-

Other operating payables

13

5,009.4

5,009.4

-

-

5,009.4

5,009.4

  

Total

 

28,565.6

28,565.6

-

-

28,127.0

28,127.0

-

-


Given the liquidity position of the Group, liquidity risk would currently appear

F-105



Back to be low or even nil.Contents



(€ million)






Note

As of December 31, 2006

Net carrying amount per IAS 39 category

Fair value

Total

Liabilities at amortized cost

Liabilities designated at fair value through profit and loss

Liabilities  at fair value through profit and loss and held for trading

Total

Liabilities at amortized cost

Liabilities designated at fair value through profit and loss

Liabilities  at fair value through profit and loss and held for trading

Borrowings and other financial liabilities

         

- long-term bonds

18

8,417.5

8,417.5

-

-

8,635.6

8,635.6

-

-

- other long-term borrowings

18

5,584.1

5,584.1

-

-

5,640.4

5,640.4

-

-

- short-term borrowings

19

2,904.1

2,904.1

-

-

2,904.1

2,904.1

-

-

- bank overdrafts and other cash position items

20

456.0

456.0

-

-

456.0

456.0

-

-

Other non-current debt

17

207.3

207.3

-

-

207.3

207.3

-

-

Trade payables

13

4,776.0

4,776.0

  

4,776.0

4,776.0

  

Other operating payables

13

4,445.6

4,445.6

-

-

4,445.6

4,445.6

-

-

Total

 

26,790.7

26,790.7

-

-

27,065.1

27,065.1

-

-




F-106



Back to Contents



(€ million)






Note

As of December 31,2005

Net carrying amount per IAS 39 category

Fair value

Total

Liabilities at amortized cost

Liabilities designated at fair value through profit and loss

Liabilities  at fair value through profit and loss and held for trading

Total

Liabilities at amortized cost

Liabilities designated at fair value through profit and loss

Liabilities  at fair value through profit and loss and held for trading

Borrowings and other financial liabilities

         

- non current bonds

18

7,857.9

7,857.9

-

-

8,333.0

8,333.0

-

-

- other long-term borrowings

18

5,864.9

5,864.9

-

-

5,985.7

5,985.7

-

-

- short-term borrowings

19

2,138.2

2,138.2

-

-

2,138.2

2,138.2

-

-

- bank overdrafts and other cash position items

20

506.8

506.8

-

-

506.8

506.8

-

-

Other non-current debt

17

203.7

203.7

-

-

203.7

203.7

-

-

Trade payables

13

4,576.3

4,576.3

  

4,576.3

4,576.3

  

Other operating payables

13

4,016.4

4,016.4

-

-

4,016.4

4,016.4

-

-

Total

 

26,941.3

26,941.3

-

-

27,537.2

27,537.2

-

-


Note 35

F-107



Back to Contents

Employee benefits

NOTE 32.


Employee benefit obligation

Share-based Compensation


compensation

Veolia Environnement share purchase and subscription option plans

The Group does not have any cash-settlement plans.

Veolia Environnement has implemented several standard fixed share purchase and subscription option plans, as well as a variable plan for management. The only share purchase plan was created on June 23, 2000.

Outstanding option plans at the end of 20052007 were as follows:


N°5

N°4

N°3

N°2

N°1

N°7

N°6

N°5

N°4

N°3

N°2

N°1

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

2007

2006

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

Grant date

12/24/2004

03/24/2003

01/28/2002

02/08/2001

06/23/2000


07/17/2007


03/28/2006


12/24/2004


03/24/2003


01/28/2002


02/08/2001


06/23/2000

Number of options granted

3,341,600

5,192,635

4,413,000

3,462,000

780,000


2,490,400


4,044,900


3,341,600


5,192,635


4,413,000


3,462,000


780,000

Number of options after legal adjustments

3,341,600

5,192,635

4,418,959

3,526,446

784,201

Number of options not exercised

3,299,652

4,672,803

4,134,649

3,339,970

517,270*

2,473,900

4,002,884

3,294,066

1,950,414

2,045,292

1,520,588

134,029 *

Plan term

8 years

8 years

8 years

8 years

8 years

8 years

8 years

8 years

Vesting conditions

3 years service plus performance conditions for certain plans

3 years service

3 years service plus performance conditions to be satisfied


4 years service plus performance conditions to be satisfied

4 years service

3 years service plus performance conditions for certain plans

3 years service

3 years service plus performance conditions to be satisfied

Average strike price (in euros)

24.72

22.50

37.25**

41.25**

31.92**

*

Given the performance criteria, the number of options effectively exercisable has been reduced.

**

Strike price adjusted to take account of transactions impacting the share capital of the Company (issue of share subscription warrants on December 17, 2001 and share capital increase with retention of preferential subscription rights on August 2, 2002). The initial strike prices for plans n°1, n°2 and n°3 were €32.50, €42.00 and €37.53 respectively.

Purchase terms

After 4 years

After 4 years

By tranches of 1/3 over 3 years

By tranches of 1/3 over 3 years

After 3 years

After 3 years

Strike price (in euros)


57.05


44.03**

24.32**

22.14**

36.65**

40.59**

31.41**

*

Given the performance criteria, the number of options effectively exercisable has been reduced.

**

Strike price adjusted to take account of transactions impacting the share capital of the Company (issue of share subscription warrants on December 17, 2001 and share capital increases with retention of preferential subscription rights on August 2, 2002 and July 10, 2007). The initial strike prices for plans n°1, n°2, n°3, n°4, n°5 and n°6 were €32.50, €42.00, €37.53, €22.50, €24.72 and €44.75 respectively.

*

Given the performance criteria, the number of options effectively exercisable has been reduced.

**

Strike price adjusted to take account of transactions impacting the share capital of the Company (issue of share subscription warrants on December 17, 2001 and share capital increases with retention of preferential subscription rights on August 2, 2002 and July 10, 2007). The initial strike prices for plans n°1, n°2, n°3, n°4, n°5 and n°6 were €32.50, €42.00, €37.53, €22.50, €24.72 and €44.75 respectively.




F-108



Back to Contents


In 2007, the Group granted 2,490,400 share options to two employee groups. The first group comprises Veolia Environnement Group management, including members of the Executive Committee. The second group comprises senior managers of Veolia Environnement Group companies and employees recognized for their excellent performance in 2006. The estimated fair value of each option granted in 2007, calculated using the Black and Scholes method, is €13.91. The assumptions underlying this model are as follows: share price of €57.26, historical volatility of 21.75 %, expected dividend yield of 2%, risk-free interest rate of 4.59 %, estimated exercise maturity of 6 years.

In 2007, the Group granted 333,700 Free Shares to employees recognized for their excellent performance in 2006. In France, rights vest after two years, followed by a two-year lock-in period and are subject to performance conditions. Outside France, rights vest after four years subject to performance conditions. The estimated fair value of each free share granted in 2007 is €57.26, net of dividends not received during the vesting period and, for shares granted to French employees, a discount for non-transferability.

Finally, the Group granted 205,200 Stock Appreciation Rights (SAR) to ordinary shares to three groups of employees: firstly, Veolia Environnement Group management, secondly senior managers of Veolia Environnement Group companies and thirdly employees recognized for their excellent performance in 2006. Rights vest after four years subject to performance conditions. The estimated fair value of each option granted in December 31, 2007 is €14.96. This value was calculated using the Black and Scholes model based on the following underlying assumptions: share price of €61.44, historical volatility of 21.66%, expected dividend yield of 2%, risk-free interest rate of 4.11%, estimated exercise maturity of 5 years, subscription price of €57.20.

The number of options granted under the three 2007 plans (share options, free shares and SAR) is determined based on the increase in net earnings per share between December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2008. This has been taken into account in the calculation of the number of options vested and the compensation expense (realization of maximum performance assumed).

In 2006, the Group granted 4,044,900 share options to three employee groups. The first group comprises Veolia Environnement Group management, including members of the Executive Committee. The second group comprises senior management of Veolia Environnement Group companies. The third group comprises Group employees recognized for their excellent performance. The estimated fair value of each option granted in 2006 was revised to €10.01 (compared to €14.77 as of December 31, 2006) to take account of historical volatility. This value was calculated using the Black and Scholes model based on the following underlying assumptions: share price of €44.75, historical volatility of 22.6%, expected dividend yield of 1.92%, risk-free interest rate of 3.69%, estimated exercise maturity of 6 years.

The Group did not grant any ordinary share options or ADS share options in 2005.

In 2004, the Group granted 3,341,600 share options to three employees groups. The first group comprised Veolia Environnement management, including members of the Veolia Environnement Executive Committee, the second group comprised senior Group executives and the third group comprised key Group employees. Given 2005 results, the options have definitively vested, subject to continued presence in the company.

The estimated fair value of each option granted in 2004, calculated using the binomial method, is €6.56. This value is based on the following underlying assumptions: share price of €25.89, expected volatility of 21.45%, expected dividend rate of 2.1%, risk-free interest rate of 3.4%. The number of options granted is based on the level of ROCE, which is taken into account in calculating both the number of options vested and the compensation expense.

Given the progressive vesting conditions based on length of presence in the company, the compensation expense for 20052007 and 20042006 is €16.2€15.6 million and €6.8€16.7 million respectively.


Information abouton share purchase and subscription options granted since 2000 is detailed below, with a breakdown of movements in 2005, 2006 and 2004 are as follows:2007 (share option plans excluding SAR plans and free share plans):


Number of shares outstanding

 

Weighted average strike price(in € )

Number of shares outstanding

 

Weighted average strike price (in € )

As of December 31, 2003

13,743,800

 

32.71

Granted

3,510,041

 

25.28

Exercised

-

 

-

Cancelled

(470,084)

 

32.38

Expired

As of December 31, 2004

16,783,757

 

30.93

16,783,757

 

30.93

Granted

-

 

-

-

 

-

Exercised

(168,692)

 

33.07

(168,692)

 

33.07

Cancelled

(650,721)

 

28.43

(650,721)

 

28.43

Expired

-

 

-

-

 

-

For the year ended December 31, 2005

15,964,344

 

31.01



F-109



Back to Contents



As of December 31, 2005

15,964,344

 

31.01

Granted

4,044,900

 

44.75

Exercised

(3,065,733)

 

34.32

Cancelled

(143,253)

 

36.04

Expired

-

 

-

As of December 31, 2006

16,800,258

 

33.67

Granted

2,490,400

 

57.05

Share capital increase of July 10, 2007

228,525

 

33.79

Exercised

(4,046,076)

 

30.20

Cancelled

(51,934)

 

49.70

Expired

-

 

-

As of December 31, 2007

15,421,173

 

37.71


Details of Veolia Environnement share purchase and subscription options outstanding as of December 31, 20052007 are as follows:


Strike price

Number of options outstanding

 

Average strike price
(in € )

 

Average residual term
(in years)

 

Number of options vested

Number of options outstanding

 

Average strike price

(in euros)

 

Average residual term

(in years)

 

Number of options vested

20-25


7,972,455

 

23.42

 

5.83

 

4,364,007

5,244,480

 

23.51

 

4.33

 

5,244,480

30-35


517,270

 

31.92

 

2.48

 

517,270

134,029

 

31.41

 

0.48

 

134,029

35-40


4,134,649

 

37.25

 

4.08

 

4,134,649

2,045,292

 

36.65

 

2.08

 

2,045,292

40-45


3,339,970

 

41.25

 

3.11

 

3,339,970

5,523,472

 

43.08

 

4.83

 

1,520,588

55-60


2,473,900

 

57.05

 

7.54

 

0

15,964,344

 

31.01

 

4.76

 

12,355,896

15,421,173

 

37.71

 

4.58

 

8,944,389

In 2005,2007, the average strikeshare price on the exercise of options exercised during the period was €30.94.€58.11.

As of December 31, 2005, 7,991,8882007, 8,944,389 options were available for exercise.exercisable.

EmployeesEmployees’ savings plans

Veolia Environnement has introducedset-up standard and leveraged savings plans which enable a large number of employees of Veolia Environnement and its subsidiaries to subscribe for Veolia Environnement shares. Employees generally benefit from a 20% discount compared with the average Veolia Environnement share price during the 20 business days preceding the date of authorization of these plans by the Board of Directors. Shares subscribed by employees under these plans are subject to certain restrictions regarding their sale or transfer by employees.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-36F-110



Back to contentsContents


Shares subscribed by Veolia Environnement employees:


2005

 

2004

2007

2006

 

2005

2004

Number of shares

1,281,931

 

1,351,468

1,415,163

1,502,731

 

1,281,931

1,351,468

Subscription price

€48.37 (*)

€37.52

 

€28.11

€18.71

Amount subscribed (€ millions)

30.5

 

25.3

68.5

56.4

 

30.5

25.3

(*) weighted average price – 1,392,857 shares were subscribed at €48.18 and 22,306 were subscribed at €60.23 (leveraged formula with the grant of share subscription warrants in Germany and leveraged formula with the grant of SAR in Australia, Canada, South Korea, Portugal and Sweden).

(*) weighted average price – 1,392,857 shares were subscribed at €48.18 and 22,306 were subscribed at €60.23 (leveraged formula with the grant of share subscription warrants in Germany and leveraged formula with the grant of SAR in Australia, Canada, South Korea, Portugal and Sweden).

In 2004,2007, a compensation expense of €3.6€49.7 million was recorded in respectaccordance with IFRS 2 on share-based payments. In 2007, Veolia Group applied the recommendations of the Group's contribution toCNC (communiqué of December 21, 2004 on Group Savings Plans and supplementary notice of February 2, 2007) and, as such, this compensation includes a discount for non-transferability of €7.2 million.  The discount for non-transferability is determined by calculating the difference between the value of a five-year forward sale of shares and the spot purchase of the same number of shares (€62.47), financed by a loan. The risk-free interest rate and the interest rate for calculating the carrying cost are 4.05% and 6.74% respectively. The notional cost of non-transferability of shares as a percentage of the spot rate of the shares at the grant date is 12%.

In 2006, a compensation expense of €24.3 million was recorded in accordance with IFRS 2 on share-based payments. In 2006, Veolia Group applied the recommendations of the CNC (communiqué of December 21, 2004 savings plan.on Group Savings Plans and supplementary notice of February 2, 2007) and, as such, this compensation includes a discount for non-transferability of €6.8 million.  The discount for non-transferability is determined by calculating the difference between the value of a five-year forward sale of shares and the spot purchase of the same number of shares (€49.18), financed by a loan. The risk-free interest rate and the interest rate for calculating the carrying cost are 3.70% and 6.40% respectively. The notional cost of non-transferability of shares as a percentage of the spot rate of the shares at the grant date is 12%.

In 2005, a compensation expense of €14.1 million was recorded in accordance with IFRS 2 on share-based payments.


Pension plans and other post-employment benefits


a- Description of plans


In accordance with the regulatory environment and collective agreements, the Group has established defined benefit (company or multi-employer) and defined contribution pension plans (company or multi-employer) in favor of employees and other post-employment benefits.


The largest defined benefit pension plans are located in the United Kingdom, with a pension obligation as of December 31, 2005 of €830 million, and in France with a pension obligation as of December 31, 2005 of €357 million, notably in respect of retirement termination payments. Benefits are based on the remuneration and length of services of employees.


Under collective agreements, certain Group companies participate in multi-employer defined benefit pension plans. These pension plans are accounted for as defined contribution plans as the information on the plans required by IAS 19 is not available and the Group does not have a consistent and reliable basis on which to allocate the obligation, plan assets and costs among the different entities participating in the plans. The main multi-employer plans are located in Sweden, Germany and the Netherlands and concern approximately 16,550 employees. The corresponding expense recorded in the Income statement is equal to annual contributions. The expense of €18.4 million in respect of 2005 is not included in the following tables.


In addition, Group companies have defined contribution plans in the majority of countries where the Group is present. Expenses incurred by the Group under these plans total €65.4 million for 2007 and €61.3 million for 2006.

Certain Group companies have established defined benefit pension plans. The largest defined benefit pension plans are not includedlocated in the following tablesUnited Kingdom, with a pension obligation as of December 31, 2007 of €1,069 million and total €37.1in France with a pension obligation as of December 31, 2007 of €421 million, for 2005.notably in respect of retirement termination payments. Benefits are based on the remuneration and length of services of employees.



F-111



Back to Contents


Under collective agreements, certain Group companies participate in multi-employer defined benefit pension plans. However, as these plans are unable to provide a consistent and reliable basis for the allocation of the obligation, assets and costs between the different participating entities, they are recorded as defined contribution plans in accordance with IAS 19. The main multi-employer plans are located in Sweden, Germany and the Netherlands and concern approximately 13,500 employees. The corresponding expense recorded in the Income Statement is equal to annual contributions and totals €29.2 million in 2007 and €26.1 million in 2006. Multi-employer plans in Sweden and the Netherlands are funded by capitalization and have surplus assets under local regulations; German multi-employer plans are funded by redistribution.

The Group also offers post-employment benefits and notably health insurance plans in the United States and France.


b-

The following tablesschedules present the resulting obligations in respect of defined benefit pension plans and other post-employment benefits

NB: these schedules exclude, by definition, defined contribution pension plans (as the obligation is limited to the annual contribution expensed in the year and the plans do not, therefore, result in the recording of a provision based on actuarial valuations) and multi-employer defined benefit pension plans which are accounted for as defined contribution pension plans.


(€ million)

As of December 31,

Pension Plans

Other post-employment benefits

Pension Plans

Other post-employment benefits

Change in the benefit obligation

As of December
31, 2005

As of December
31, 2004

As of December
31, 2005

As of December
31, 2004

2007

2006

2005

2007

2006

2005

Benefit obligation at beginning of year

1,103.4

994.1

24.5

3.1

1,836.0

1,457.4

1,103.4

53.8

25.9

24.5

Current service cost

49.7

62.9

0.6

0.4

61.8

55.6

49.7

1.6

1.5

0.6

Interest cost

57.6

48.4

1.3

1.5

85.7

67.2

57.6

2.3

2.1

1.3

Plan participants’ contributions

6.5

4.8

-

Plan participants' contributions

7.9

6.0

6.5

-

-

-

Benefit obligation assumed on acquisition of subsidiaries

33.4

3.5

-

41.3

325.2

33.4

-

25.1

-

Benefit obligation transferred on disposal of subsidiaries

(0.8)

(35.1)

-

(2.3)

(0.9)

(0.8)

-

-

-

Curtailments / liquidations

(9.5)

(3.9)

(3.1)

-

(12.9)

(9.4)

(9.5)

(8.3)

-

(3.1)

Actuarial loss (gain)

237.8

45.7

(1.0)

-

(128.5)

(15.6)

237.8

(5.9)

0.9

(1.0)

Benefits paid

(66.5)

(46.0)

(1.5)

(1.9)

(75.6)

(68.2)

(66.5)

(2.6)

(2.1)

(1.5)

Plan amendments

4.7

20.8

-

8.0

21.1

20.6

4.7

-

-

-

Other (incl. changes in consolidation scope and foreign exchange translation)

41.1

8.2

5.1

13.4

(101.1)

(1.9)

41.1

0.1

0.4

5.1

(1) Benefit obligation at end of year

1,457.4

1,103.4

25.9

24.5

1,733.4

1,836.0

1,457.4

41.0

53.8

25.9



(€ million)

Pension Plans

Other post-employment benefits

Change in plan assets

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

714.2

668.5

 

-

Expected return on plan assets

46.2

38.5

-

-

Actuarial gains (losses)

57.2

21.7

-

-

Group contributions

64.3

39.9

-

-

Plan participants’ contributions

6.5

4.8

-

-

Plan assets acquired on acquisition of subsidiaries

0.1

-

-

-

Plan assets transferred on disposal of subsidiaries

-

(27.5)

-

-

Curtailments / liquidations

(3.6)

(0.3)

-

-

Benefits paid

(39.8)

(28.6)

-

-

Other (incl. changes in consolidation scope and foreign exchange translation)

22.1

(2.7)

-

-

(2) Fair value of plan assets at end of year

867.2

714.2

-

-



F-112



Back to Contents



(€ million)

As of December 31,

Pension Plans

Other post-employment benefits

Change in plan assets

2007

2006

2005

2007

2006

2005

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

1,220.8

867.2

714.2

-

-

-

Expected return on plan assets

70.9

55.4

46.2

-

-

-

Actuarial gains (losses)

(5.6)

21.5

57.2

-

-

-

Group contributions

74.9

62.0

64.3

-

-

-

Plan participants' contributions

7.9

6.0

6.5

-

-

-

Plan assets acquired on acquisition of subsidiaries

24.8

243.1

0.1

-

-

-

Plan assets transferred on disposal of subsidiaries

(0.5)

(0.1)

-

-

-

-

Liquidations

(9.9)

-

(3.6)

-

-

-

Benefits paid

(47.8)

(45.2)

(39.8)

-

-

-

Other (incl. changes in consolidation scope and foreign exchange translation)

(92.8)

10.9

22.1

-

-

-

(2) Fair value of plan assets at end of year

1,242.7

1,220.8

867.2

-

-

-


Group pension plan assets were invested as follows as of December 31, 20052007, 2006 and 2004 :2005:


As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Shares

47%

42%

50%

51%

47%

Bonds and debt instruments

36%

36%

38%

39%

36%

Insurance risk free funds

10%

12%

8%

8%

10%

Cash

6%

8%

3%

1%

6%

Other

1%

2%

1%

1%

1%




(€ million)

2007

2006

2005

Change in repayment entitlement

   

Fair value of repayment entitlement at beginning of year

25.9

7.5

7.2

Expected return on repayment entitlement

1.1

0.7

0.3

Actuarial gains (losses)

(3.3)

(0.4)

0.4

Repayment entitlement acquired on acquisition of subsidiaries

-

18.6

-

Repayments

(2.2)

(0.5)

(0.2)

Other (incl. changes in consolidation scope and foreign exchange translation)

-

-

(0.2)

Fair value of repayment entitlement at end of year

21.5

25.9

7.5




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-37F-113



Back to contentsContents


The market value of repayment entitlement recorded in assets as of December 31, 2007 is €21.5 million. Repayment entitlement concerns employee rights to post-employment benefits, corresponding to periods during which they were employed by a previous employer.


(€ million)

Pension Plans

Other post-employment benefits

 

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

Funded status = (2) – (1)

(590.2)

(389.1)

(25.9)

(24.5)

Unrecognized past service costs

33.2

36.4

7.7

7.6

Unrecognized actuarial gains (losses)

-

-

-

-

Other

(2.8)

(2.0)

0.8

-

Net obligation

(559.8)

(354.7)

(17.4)

(16.9)

Provisions

(560.2)

(368.5)

(17.4)

(16.9)

Prepaid benefits

0.4

13.8

-

-


(€ million)

As of December 31,

Pension Plans

Other post-employment benefits

2007

2006

2005

2007

2006

2005

Funding status= (2) – (1)

(490.7)

(615.2)

(590.2)

(41.0)

(53.8)

(25.9)

Unrecognized past service costs

61.2

50.3

33.2

-

7.0

7.7

Other

(6.4)

(5.3)

(2.8)

-

-

0.8

Net obligation

(435.9)

(570.2)

(559.8)

(41.0)

(46.8)

(17.4)

Provisions

(445.3)

(580.1)

(560.2)

(41.0)

(46.8)

(17.4)

Prepaid benefits

9.4

9.9

0.4

-

-

-


The Projected Benefit Obligation (PBO) is €284.3€333.8 million for unfunded defined benefit plans and €1,173.1€1,440.7 million for partially and fully funded plans as of December 31, 2005,2007, compared with €223.4€297.8 million and €880.0€1,538.2 million respectively at the end of 2004.2006 and €284.3 million and €1,173.1 million respectively at the end of 2005.

The actual return on plan assets was €65.3 million in 2007, compared to €76.9 million in 2006 and €103.4 million in 2005, compared to €60.2 million in 2004.2005.

Employer contributions in 20052007 include exceptional contributions of €28 million in France and the United Kingdom of €24 million.Kingdom.

The Group plans to make contributions of €40€45.0 million to defined benefit plans in 2006.2008.

Amounts recognized in the Income statementNet benefit costs for the period are as follows:


(€ million)

Pension Plans

Other post-employment benefits

As of December 31,

As of December
31, 2005

As of December
31, 2004

As of December
31, 2005

As of December
31, 2004

(€ million)



Pension Plans

Other post-employment benefits

2007

2006

2005

2007

2006

2005

49.7

62.9

0.6

0.4

61.8

55.6

49.7

1.6

1.5

0.6

Interest cost

57.6

48.4

1.3

1.5

85.7

67.2

57.6

2.3

2.1

1.3

Expected return on plan assets

(46.2)

(42.7)

-

-

(70.9)

(55.4)

(46.2)

-

-

Expected return on repayment entitlement

(1.1)

(0.7)

-

-

-

Past service costs recognized in the year

2.4

0.9

0.5

0.2

7.6

3.8

2.4

0.1

0.5

Curtailments / liquidations

(4.9)

(0.1)

-

(6.8)

(3.1)

(10.1)

(4.9)

-

-

Other

4.6

(4.3)

-

-

(0.3)

(1.8)

4.6

-

-

Net expense recognized in the Income statement

63.2

65.1

2.4

(4.7)

Net benefit cost

79.7

58.6

63.2

4.0

4.1

2.4


These costs were recorded in full in operating income, except for interest costs and the expected return on plan assets which are recorded in net finance costs.



F-114



Back to Contents


c- Actuarial assumptions


Actuarial assumptions used for calculation purposes vary depending on the country in which the plan is implemented. Group assets in France are primarily invested with insurance companies and the expected long-term return on these assets is directly linked to past rates of return. Assets in the United Kingdom are primarily invested in shares and bonds via a trust and expected long-term rates of return are based on long-term market performance statistics.


Pension Plans


EmployeesEmployees’ pension obligations as of December 31, 20052007, 2006 and 20042005 are based on the following average assumptions:


Pension Obligations

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Discount rate

4.45%

5.0%

5.49%

4.74%

4.45%

Expected rate of salary increase

3.3%

3.8%

3.5%

3.65%

3.3%



Periodic movements in pension benefit obligations forin 2007, 2006 and 2005 and 2004 are based on the following average assumptions:


 

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

Discount rate

5.0%

5.4%

Expected return on plan assets

6.3%

6.6%

Expected rate of salary increase

3.8%

3.8%

Average residual life expectancy (in years)

15.0

15.0


 

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Discount rate

4.7%

4.5%

5.0%

Expected return on plan assets

6.0%

6.2%

6.3%

Expected rate of salary increase

3.7%

3.3%

3.8%

Average residual active life expectancy (in years)

12.0

13.8

15.0

The actual return on planplans assets in 2007, 2006 and 2005 was 5.3%, 7.4% and 2004 was 14.3% respectively.

The benefit obligation is especially sensitive to the discount rate and 9.1% respectively. Thisinflation.  A 1% increase in the actual return was mainly due todiscount rate would decrease the good performance of Group pension fundsbenefit obligation by €248 million and current service costs by €14 million. A 1% decrease in the United Kingdom.discount rate would increase the benefit obligation by €293 million and current service costs by €14 million.


Conversely, a 1% increase in the inflation rate would increase the benefit obligation by €226 million and current service costs by €6 million. A 1% decrease in the inflation rate would decrease the benefit obligation by €193 million and current service costs by €6 million.

Other post-employment benefits

Additional assumptions concerning health insurance plans are as follows:


Average rate of increase in health insurance costs

2005

2004

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Assumed rate of increase in health costs in the coming year

8.4%

8.6%

5.4 %

5.5%

8.4%

Target rate of increase in costs

4.2%

4.2%

3.5%

4.0%

4.2%

Year long-term rate is expected to stabilize

2016

2016

2020

2014

2016


Assumptions concerning increasesthe growth in health insurance costs impact the post-employment benefit obligation as follows: a 1% increase in growth assumptions increasesthe assumed rate of increase in health costs would increase the post-employment benefit obligation by  €1.6€6.3 million whileand, conversely, a 1% decrease in growth assumptions decreaseswould reduce the post-employment benefit obligation by €1.4€5.0 million.

Assumptions concerning the growthrate of increase in health insurance costs have a minimal impact on the current service cost.

Amounts for the current period are as follows:


(€ million)

2005

 

Pension Plans

Other post-employment benefits

Benefit obligation at year end

(1,457.4)

(25.9)

Fair value of plan assets at year end

867.2

-

Funded status of plan

(590.2)

(25.9)

Actuarial gains (losses) / experience adjustments on liabilities

(15.6)

1.6

Actuarial gains (losses) / experience adjustments on plan assets

57.2

-




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-38F-115



Back to contentsContents


Note 36Amounts for the current and prior periods are as follows:


Pension Obligations

2007

2006

2005

Benefit obligation at year end

(1,733.4)

(1,836.0)

(1,457.4)

Fair value of plan assets at year end

1,242.7

1,220.8

867.2

Funded status of plan

(490.7)

(615.2)

(590.2)

Actuarial gains (losses) / experience adjustments on obligations


(0.7)


3.4


(15.6)

Actuarial gains (losses) / experience adjustments on plan assets


(5.6)


21.5


57.2


Other post-employment benefits

2007

2006

2005

Benefit obligation at year end

(41.0)

(53.8)

(25.9)

Fair value of plan assets at year end

-

-

-

Funded status of plan

(41.0)

(53.8)

(25.9)

Actuarial gains (losses) / experience adjustments on obligations


1.9


(0.7)


1.6

Actuarial gains (losses) / experience adjustments on plan assets

-

-

-



Cumulative actuarial gains and losses on obligations and assets and the change in the asset ceiling recognized in equity is as follows:


 

2007

2006

Cumulative amount as of January 1

(172.7)

(206.0)

Change during the period

124.4

33.3

Cumulative amount as of December 31

(48.3)

(172.7)


NOTE 33.


Main acquisitions

Main33.1

Acquisitions in 2007

Acquisitions in 2007 with related net cash flows exceeding €100 million are described hereafter.

Acquisitions in 2007 with related net cash flows of less than €100 million represent business combinations costs of €1,574 million. These acquisitions contributed €525 million to Group revenue in 20052007.

No material negative goodwill was recognized in respect of these acquisitions.

In general, goodwill balances are justified by synergies with existing operations in the Group and future developments.


Acquisition of Sulo (Germany)

Veolia Environnement purchased the entire share capital of the Sulo Group on July 2, 2007. This company is the number two in waste management in Germany and the market leader in the collection of municipal waste and packaging.



F-116



Back to Contents


This transaction was recognized in accordance with the standard on business combinations (IFRS 3).

However, the allocation of the cost of the business combination is likely to be modified in 2008 and asset and liability fair values recorded at the balance sheet date are provisional. They break down as follows:


(€ million)

Net carrying amount excluding IFRS 5

IFRS 5

Net carrying amount

Fair value adjustments

2007 provisional fair value

Assets

     

Intangible assets

9.6

(0.1)

9.5

260.7

270.2

Property, plant and equipment

279.1

(23.5)

255.6

81.1

336.7

Non-current financial assets

45.4

(0.1)

45.3

1.9

47.2

Deferred tax assets

26.6

 

26.6

85.4

112.0

Working capital assets

258.4

(41.3)

217.1

0.1

217.2

Current financial assets

9.5

2.8

12.3

(0.1)

12.2

Cash

121.8

(2.2)

119.6

-

119.6

Assets classified as held for sale

8.4

192.2

200.6

19.6

220.2

Liabilities

     

Minority interests

-

-

-

(4.6)

(4.6)

Non-current provisions

(41.1)

4.6

(36.5)

-

(36.5)

Long-term borrowings

(1,120.3)

0.5

(1,119.8)

-

(1,119.8)

Deferred tax liabilities

(11.0)

0.9

(10.1)

(139.1)

(149.2)

Other non-current debt

-

-

-

-

-

Current provisions

(31.0)

7.4

(23.6)

-

(23.6)

Working capital liabilities

(172.4)

5.0

(167.4)

-

(167.4)

Short-term borrowings

(131.4)

(34.7)

(166.1)

-

(166.1)

Liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale

(7.9)

(20.3)

(28.2)

-

(28.2)

Total net assets

(756.3)

91.2

(665.1)

305.1

(360.0)

Net assets purchased (100%)

 

 

 

 

(360.0)

Residual goodwill

 

 

 

 

687.6

Business combination cost

 

 

 

 

327.6

Net cash flows relating to the acquisition

 

 

 

 

208

Purchase price

 

 

 

 

327.6

Cash transferred in

 

 

 

 

119.6

The portion of the business combination cost allocated to intangible assets primarily corresponds to the fair value of customer contracts and customer relations.

The net carrying amount includes the activities of Sulo ET sold outside the Group in September 2007 and recorded in Assets classified as held for sale (pursuant to IFRS 5).

The fair value includes a portion of deferred tax assets on tax losses recognized on the basis of forecast future accounting profits.

The residual goodwill of €687.6 million mainly corresponds to future Group developments in Germany in the Environmental Services sector.

Sulo contributed €628 million to Group revenue in 2007.



F-117



Back to Contents


Acquisition of B.V.A.G.VSA Tecnitalia (Italy)


On January 10, 2005,October 3, 2007, the WaterEnvironmental Services Division purchased a 74.9% interest75% of the share capital of VSA Tecnitalia, the Italian subsidiary of Termomeccanica Ecologica, specializing in waste management and treatment.

This transaction was recognized in accordance with the standard on business combinations (IFRS 3).

However, the allocation of the cost of the business combination is likely to be modified in 2008 and asset and liability fair values recorded at the balance sheet date are provisional. They break down as follows:


(€ million)

 

Net carrying amount

Fair value adjustments

Fair value

Assets

    

Intangible assets

 

3.4

28.9

32.3

Property, plant and equipment

 

187.8

(186.5)

1.3

Non-current financial assets

 

3.9

216.5

220.4

Deferred tax assets

 

6.9

18.4

25.3

Working capital assets

 

142.2

(13.6)

128.6

Current financial assets

 

-

6.1

6.1

Cash

 

6.6

-

6.6

Liabilities

    

Minority interests

 

(4.0)

(0.0)

(4.0)

Non-current provisions

 

(3.6)

(40.0)

(43.6)

Long-term borrowings

 

(140.4)

0.1

(140.3)

Deferred tax liabilities

 

(1.7)

(25.0)

(26.7)

Other non-current debt

 

(3.7)

-

(3.7)

Current provisions

 

(0.1)

-

(0.1)

Working capital liabilities

 

(107.1)

-

(107.1)

Short-term borrowings

 

(30.0)

-

(30.0)

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

 

(3.1)

-

(3.1)

Total net assets

 

57.1

4.9

62.0

Net assets purchased (100%)

 

 

 

62.0

Residual goodwill

 

 

 

106.9

Purchase price

 

 

 

104.6

Minority put options at fair value (residual 25%)

 

 

 

64.4

Business combination cost

 

 

 

168.9

Net cash flows relating to the acquisition

 

 

 

101.1

Purchase price

 

 

 

104.6

Cash transferred in

   

3.5

The portion of the business combination cost allocated to intangible assets corresponds to the contract portfolio.

Property, plant and equipment falling within the application scope of IFRIC 12, as applied by the Group, were transferred to non-current financial assets.

The residual goodwill of €106.9 million mainly corresponds to development opportunities in this sector in Italy.

VSA Tecnitalia contributed €26.2 million to Group revenue in 2007.



F-118



Back to Contents


Acquisition of Thermal North America Inc. (United States)

On December 12, 2007, the Energy Services Division purchased the entire share capital of the private company Thermal North America, Inc., the largest portfolio of heating and cooling networks in the company Braunschweiger Versorgungs AG including subsidiaries in partner’ship with Kraftwerk Mehrum & Energienetze Braunschweig GmbH.United States.

This company managestransaction was recognized in accordance with the water supply,standard on business combinations (IFRS 3).

However, the municipal heating, electricity and gas networkallocation of the citycost of Braunschweig (Germany)the business combination is likely to be modified in 2008 and the asset and liability fair values recorded at the balance sheet date are provisional. They break down as follows:


(€ million)

 

Net carrying amount

Fair value adjustments

Fair value

Assets

    

Intangible assets

 

-

31.4

31.4

Property, plant and equipment

 

375.9

23.0

398.9

Non-current financial assets

 

7.4

(3.2)

4.2

Deferred tax assets

 

19.9

-

19.9

Working capital assets

 

52.9

(1.5)

51.4

Current financial assets

 

20.3

-

20.3

Cash

 

8.5

-

8.5

Liabilities

    

Non-current provisions

 

(3.8)

(4.6)

(8.4)

Long-term borrowings

 

(26.6)

(0.0)

(26.6)

Deferred tax liabilities

 

(27.4)

(17.0)

(44.4)

Other non-current debt

 

(0.1)

-

(0.1)

Current provisions

 

(4.0)

-

(4.0)

Working capital liabilities

 

(40.9)

(5.0)

(45.9)

Short-term borrowings

 

(230.3)

2.0

(228.3)

Total net assets

 

151.8 

25.1

176.9

Net assets purchased (100%)

 

 

 

176.9

Residual goodwill

 

 

 

139.3

Business combination cost

 

 

 

316.2

Net cash flows relating to the acquisition

 

 

 

307.7

Purchase price

 

 

 

316.2

Cash transferred in

   

8.5


The allocation of the business combination cost to intangible assets and property, plant and equipment corresponds to the value of certain intangible assets (value of supplier contracts) and the fair value remeasurement of production assets, respectively.

Residual goodwill of €139.3 million mainly corresponds to future development opportunities in the Energy Services sector in the United States.


33.2

Main acquisitions in 2006

Fair values allocated to assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2006 in respect of the acquisition of Cleanaway in the United Kingdom, Biffa in Belgium, Kunming in China and Supershuttle in the United States were not significantly modified in 2007.

Purchase price allocations to assets and liabilities in respect of the following 2006 acquisitions became definitive in 2007 and are detailed below:



F-119



Back to Contents


Acquisition of SNCM

On May 31, 2006, the Transportation Division signed an agreement for the takeover of SNCM within the framework of a concession contract.the privatization process decided by the French State, for €12.6 million. Given the shareholders’ agreement, SNCM is fully consolidated.

This transaction was recognized using the purchase accounting method.

The net assets acquired and the goodwill recognized break down as follows:


(€ million)

Net carrying amount of net assets

Fair value adjustments

Fair valueof net assets

Intangible assets

3

23

26

Property, plant and equipment

329

102

431

Financial assets

48

-

48

Deferred tax assets

18

(8)

10

Working capital assets

39

1

40

Cash and cash equivalents

47

-

47

Provisions

(18)

(2)

(20

Working capital liabilities

(48)

1

(47)

Deferred tax liabilities

(90)

(43)

(133)

Borrowings

(3)

-

(3)

Minority interests Energienetze Braunschweig GmbH

(1)

-

(1)

Total net assets

324

74

398

Net assets purchased (74.9%)

  

298

Residual goodwill

  

76

Purchase price

  

374

Cash flows relating to the acquisitions

  

327

Purchase price

  

374

Cash transferred in

  

47



The portionallocation of the purchase price allocated to intangible assets corresponds toand liabilities acquired was provisional at the value2006 year end and was contingent on European Commission approval of the contract acquired. The portionState aid and the granting of the purchase price allocated to property, plant and equipment takes terms and conditions into account regarding the value of the assets to be returned at the end of the contract..

Residual goodwill of €75.8 million mainly corresponds to the Group’s ability to renew the contracts, commercial development potential and potential savings in operating expenses and capital expenditure.

B.V.A.G. contributed €349.6 million to Revenue of the Group in 2005.


Acquisition of ZEC Lodz

In August 2005, the Energy Services Division signed a contractpublic service license for the acquisition of the company managing the urban heating network of the town of LodzMarseille–Corsica crossing. The agreement was finalized in Poland for a consideration of €171.1 million (Group share).June 2007.

The acquisition took effect on October 1, 2005.

This transaction was recognized using the purchase accounting method. However, purchasepurchasing price allocation procedures had not been completed as of December 31, 2005 and as such, the fair value of assets and liabilities adopted at the balance sheet date and presented below is provisional:2006 year end were modified in 2007.

These adjustments break down as follows:

(€ million)

Net carrying amount

Fair value adjustments

2006 provisional fair value

2006 provision fair value corrected for minority put options

2007 adjustments

2007 definitive
fair value

Assets

      

Intangible assets

1.3

-

1.3

1.3

-

1.3

Property, plant and equipment

124.4

268.6

393.0

393.0

(1.1)

391.9

Non-current financial assets

138.6

(28.5)

110.1

110.1

(22.0)

88.1

Deferred tax assets

-

53.1

53.1

53.1

4.5

57.6

Working capital assets

109.1

(4.1)

105.0

105.0

20.4

125.4

Cash

99.3

-

99.3

99.3

-

99.3

Liabilities

      

Non-current provisions

(95.6)

(169.3)

(264.9)

(264.9)

95.0

(169.9)

Long-term borrowings

(2.9)

(31.3)

(34.2)

(34.2)

-

(34.2)

Deferred tax liabilities

-

(66.7)

(66.7)

(66.7)

0.4

(66.3)

Other non-current debt

(38.5)

38.5

-

-

-

-

Current provisions

(2.0)

(93.1)

(95.1)

(95.1)

20.8

(74.3)

Working capital liabilities

(166.4)

2.3

(164.1)

(164.1)

(37.9)

(202.0)

Short-term borrowings

(0.3)

(48.3)

(48.6)

(48.6)

-

(48.6)

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

(7.8)

0.1

(7.7)

(7.7)

-

(7.7)

Total net assets

159.2

(78.7)

80.5

80.5

80.1

160.6

Net assets purchased (91%)

  

22.8

73.3

72.9

146.2

Residual goodwill

  

10.2

(0.2)

(10.7)

(10.9)

Purchase price

  

12.6

12.6

-

12.6

Minority put options at fair value

  

-

60.5

62.2

122.7

Business combination cost

  

12.6

73.1

62.2

135.3

Net cash flows relating to the acquisition

  

(79.0)

(79.0)

-

(79.0)

Purchase price

  

12.6

12.6

-

12.6

Cash transferred in

  

91.6

91.6

-

91.6

The residual negative goodwill of €10.9 million was expensed in the Income Statement.


(€ million)

Fair valueof net assets

Intangible assets

1

Property, plant and equipment

131

Financial assets

2

Deferred tax assets

25

Working capital assets

17

Cash and cash equivalents

6

Provisions

(18)

Working capital liabilities

(24)

Deferred tax liabilities

-

Borrowings

(5)

Total net assets

135

Net assets purchased (85.0%)

115

Residual goodwill

56

Purchase price

171

Cash flows relating to the acquisitions

154

Purchase price

171

Cash transferred in

17


Lodz contributed €41.9 million to Revenue from ordinary activities of the Group in 2005 (one activity quarter).



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-39F-120



Back to contentsContents



NOTE 34.

Note 37Construction contracts


Construction contracts


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

Construction contracts in progress / Assets  (A)

54.8

41.7

Construction contracts in progress / Liabilities  (B)

73.3

70.8

Construction contracts in progress, net  (A - B)

-18.5

-29.1

   

Incurred costs including income and losses accounted for up to date  (C)

1,153.3

822.7

Issued invoices (D)

1,171.8

851.8

Construction contracts in progress, net  (C - D)

-18.5

-29.1

   

Customers pre-paid amounts

195.4

107.7

(€ million)

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

Construction contracts in progress / Assets (A)

593.8

403.3

Construction contracts in progress / Liabilities (B)

232.0

109.3

Construction contracts in progress / net (A) – (B)

361.8

294.0

Costs incurred plus income and losses recognized to date (C)

4,068.7

1,826.3

Amounts billed (D)

3,706.9

1,532.3

Construction contracts in progress / net (C) – (D)

361.8

294.0

Customer advances

41.2

21.4


The amount of costs incurred, plus profits and less losses recognized (notably in provisions for losses to completion) and intermediary billings is determined on an individual contract basis. Where positive, this amount is recognized in assets in “Construction contracts in progress/Assets”. Where negative, this amount is recognized in liabilities in “Construction contracts in progress/Liabilities”.


Note 38


Concession contracts


In the course of its business, Veolia Environnement provides collective services (distribution of drinking water and heating, passenger transport network, household waste collection, etc.) to local authorities who pay a price based on services rendered.

These collective services (also known as services of general interest or general economic interest or public services) are generally managed by Veolia Environnement under contracts entered into at the request of public bodies which retain control thereof.

Concession contracts involve the transfer of operating rights for a limited period, under the control of the local authority, using dedicated installations built by Veolia Environnement, or made available to it for a fee or nil consideration:

Ø

These contracts define “public service obligations” in return for a remuneration. The remuneration is based on operating conditions, continuity of service, price rules and obligations with respect to the maintenance/replacement of installations. The contract determines the conditions for the transfer of installations to the local authority or a successor at its term.

Ø

Veolia Environnement can, in certain cases, be responsible for a given service as it holds the service support network (water/heat distribution network, water treatment network). Such situations are the result of full or partial privatizations. Provisions impose public service obligations and the means by which the local authority may recover control of the concession holder.

These contracts generally include price review clauses. These clauses are mainly based on cost trends, inflation, changes in tax and/or other legislation and occasionally on changes in volumes and/or the occurrence of specific events changing the profitability of the contract.

In addition, the Group generally assumes a contractual obligation to maintain and repair facilities managed under public service contracts. Resulting maintenance and repair costs are analyzed in accordance with IAS 37 on provisions and expensed as incurred, and where appropriate, a provision for future maintenance and repair costs is recorded.

The nature and extent of the Group’s rights and obligations under these different contracts differ according to the public services rendered by the different Group segments.


NOTE 35.

Water:Operating leases

Veolia Environnement manages municipal drinking water and/or waste water services. These services encompass the full water cycle (extraction from natural sources, treatment, storage and distribution followed by collection and treatment of waste water and release into the environment).

In France, these services are primarily rendered under public service delegation affermage contracts with a term of 8 to 20 years. They concern the distribution of drinking water and the collection and treatment of waste water. They use specific assets, such as distribution or wastewater treatment networks and drinking water or wastewater treatment plants, which are generally provided by the concession grantor and returned to it at the end of the contract.

Abroad, Veolia Environnement renders its services under contracts which reflect local legislation, the economic situation of the country and the investment needs of each partner.

These contracts are generally concession contracts, service contracts or O&M (Operate & Manage) and BOT contracts with an average term of between 7 and 40 years, and sometimes longer.

Contracts can also be entered into with public entities in which Veolia Environnement purchased an interest on their partial privatization. The profitability of these contracts is not fundamentally different from other contracts, but operations are based on a partnership agreement with the local authority.


Waste management:

Both in France and abroad, Veolia Environnement generally operates under concession contracts for the treatment and recovery of waste in sorting units, storage and incineration. These contracts have an average term of 18 to 30 years.


Energy services:

Veolia Environnement has developed a range of energy management activities: heating and cooling networks, thermal and multi-technical services, industrial utilities, installation and maintenance of production equipment, integration services for the comprehensive management of buildings and electrical services on public roadways.

The main contracts concern the management of heating and air-conditioning networks under urban concessions or on behalf of local authorities or building complexes (hospitals, etc.).

In Eastern Europe, Veolia Environnement’s Energy Services Division provides services under mixed partial privatizations or through public-private partnerships with local authorities responsible for the production and distribution of thermal energy.


Transportation

Veolia Environnement’s transportation Division provides passenger transport services on behalf of local, regional and national public authorities.

Veolia Environnement primarily provides these services in France and abroad under service contracts comprising public service obligations (as per EU terminology), with terms of 7 to 15 years.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-40



Back to contents



Note 39


Finance Leases and Operating Leases


Assets financed by financeoperating lease

Assets financed by finance leases as of December 31, 2005 are as follows:


(€ million)

Property, plant and equipment, net

IFRIC 4 loans, net

Total

    

As of December 31, 2005

664.4

260.6

925.0

As of December 31, 2004

687.2

283.2

970.4


The Group acquires certainenters into operating assets and investment properties under finance lease. Futureleases (mainly for transportation equipment).

The future minimum lease payments total €1,081under operating leases amount to €2,190.0 million as of December 31, 2005. The present value of minimum lease payments of €9042007, compared to €2,125.9 million as of December 31, 2005 is recorded in borrowings (€802.02006 and €1,894.5 million in long-term borrowings and €102 million in short-term borrowings).


as of December 31, 2005.

As of December 31, 2005,2007, future minimum lease payments under these contracts were as follows:


(€ million)

Finance lease [in the BS]

2006

177.9

2007

151.8

2008

127.7

2009

106.9

2010

91.7

2011 and thereafter

425.0

Total future minimum lease payments

1,081.0

Less amounts representing interests

176.9

Present value of minimum lease payments (finance leases)

904.1

(€ million)

Operating lease

2008

495.0

2009 & 2010

780.3

2011 & 2012

410.3

2013 and thereafter

504.4

Total future minimum lease payments

2,190.0




F-121



Assets financed by operating lease

In addition, the Group enters into operating leases (mainly for transportation equipment).


The future minimum lease payments under operating leases amountBack to €1,894.5 million as of December 31, 2005, compared to €1,754.7 million as of  December 31, 2004.Contents


As of December 31, 2005, future minimum lease payments under these contracts break down by date as follows:


(€ million)

Operating lease

2006

425.5

2007

395.8

2008

354.2

2009

237.5

2010

168.5

2011 and thereafter

313.0

Total future minimum lease payments

1,894.5


Note 40NOTE 36.


Proportionately consolidated companies


Summarized financial information in respect of proportionately consolidated companies is set out below:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Non-current assets

5,629.7

4,983.3

6,757.3

5,651.9

5,635.3

Current assets

2,448.4

2,322.2

3,115.5

2,898.2

2,450.2

Total assets

8,078.1

7,305.5

9,872.8

8,550.1

8,085.5

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

1,378.3

1,201.6

2,295.9

1,367.0

1,375.3

Minority interests

765.7

703.4

895.5

945.9

759.0

Non-current liabilities

3,210.0

2,703.2

2,650.8

3,293.4

3,230.0

Current liabilities

2,724.1

2,697.3

4,030.6

2,943.8

2,721.2

Total equity and liabilities

8,078.1

7,305.5

9,872.8

8,550.1

8,085.5



(€ million)

For the year ended December 31,

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

2005

2004

Income statement data

 

Income Statement data

  

Revenue

3,611.4

3,064.5

4,623.7

4,143.4

3,679.1

Operating income

442.9

315.0

659.9

540.1

430.9

Net income for the year

105.5

141.7

322.9

109.9

100.1

Financing data

 

 

 

Operating cash flow

681.9

412.0

Investing cash flow

(501.9)

(498.3)

Financing cash flow

(276.1)

198.2

Operating cash flows

567.0

521.2

525.4

Investing cash flows

(566.8)

(258.0)

(347.0)

Financing cash flows

(289.9)

(281.3)

(274.2)


The main contributions of proportionately consolidated companies were as follows:

·

BWB (Berlin water services company) in Germany is 50% consolidated and contributed revenue of €551€582 million, operating income of €187€270 million, net assets of €2,708 million and borrowingsnet indebtedness of €1,452€1,405 million;

·

Dalkia International is 75.81% consolidated 75.79% and contributed revenue of €1,384€2,027 million, operating income of €214 million and net assets of €1,643 million;

·

Thethe Proactiva Group in South America contributed revenue of €112 million.

The increase in revenue is attributable in the amount of €334€130 million, to Dalkia. The increase in operating income is mainly attributable to the Water Divisionof €16 million and Dalkia.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-41



Back to contents


net assets of €52 million;


Note 41NOTE 37.

Tax reviews


Tax reviews


In the normal course of their business, the Group's subsidiariesGroup entities in France and abroad are subjected to regular tax reviews.

In France, the tax authorities have carried out nearly 50 tax reviews in Francerespect of both consolidated tax groups and abroad.

In 2005, mostindividual entities. These tax reviews are not all definitively closed: certain issues giving rise to revised assessments are still under discussion as part of the normal process and other revised assessments have not been called for collection. When a review is closed and the tax reviews carried outamount agreed with the tax authorities, the tax base is adjusted accordingly. Veolia Group records a provision in the French companies of the four segments did not result in the notificationrespect of revised assessments. The Group is currently inassessments under discussion with the tax authorities, regardingwhere the revised assessments outstanding as of December 31, 2005. Given both legislative changes atissue in question does not merely represent a timing difference and an outflow is probable in accordance with IAS 37. Quite naturally, the end of 2005 andlargest provisions concern the nature of discussions,Group’s largest companies in France.



F-122



Back to Contents


Outside France, the Group expects its position to prevail with regard to differencesis present in principle and the most material amounts. Reviews which could lead to additional tax expenses were adequately provided.

The Group operates in nearly 65numerous countries and is regularly reviewed outside France. Taxconstantly the subject to tax reviews. Among the countries where the Group has a strong presence, tax reviews are presentlynotably in progress in Germany and in the United States of America, two significant markets for the Group. (Strong involvement throughout the tax review process in both countries enabled the matters subjectMorocco covering fiscal years 2000 to verification to be identified and significantly reduced).date. Where necessary, claimsrevised assessments and outstandingidentified uncertain tax matterspositions in respect of which a claimrevised assessment has not been yet issued are adequately provided, and provision amounts are regularly reviewed in accordance with IAS 37 criteria.

In the United States, the Group has launched a pre-filing agreement procedure with the Internal Revenue Service (I.R.S) in order to validate the amount of tax losses as of December 31, 2006, following the reorganization of Water Division activities (“Worthless Stock Deduction”). This reorganization led to the recognition of losses relating to the operations and disposal of former U.S. Filter activities in recent years as ordinary tax losses, in an amount which could exceed U.S.$ 4 billion. Despite holding several external opinions confirming its position, the Group decided to request immediate validation of these tax losses by the tax authorities, given the amount in question. The Group has received nearly 30 detailed information requests from the I.R.S and will provide comprehensive replies.

In addition, the Group is also subject to a tax review in the United States covering its ordinary activities in 2004 and 2005. This tax review is complicated by the numerous legal reorganizations which accompanied the piecemeal sale of U.S. Filter assets. The duration and outcome of this review are difficult to estimate precisely.  Nonetheless, the majority of potential tax uncertainties, if confirmed, would have a limited impact on the consolidated financial statements of the Group due to the tax losses generated by the reorganization of the Water Division activities.


Note 42NOTE 38.


Off-balance sheet commitments

Commitments and contingencies


Specific commitments given


Southern Water operation

In 2003, the Company refinanced its investment in Southern Water. As a result, the company signed an initial contract with Société Générale Bank et Trust SA (“SGBT”) on June 30, 2003 and a subsequent contract with CDC Ixis on July 18, 2003. The terms of these contracts are as follows:

SGBT and CDC Ixis each subscribed for £110 million of non-voting preferred shares issued by Southern Water and previously acquired by Veolia Water UK.

SGBT and CDC Ixis each hold a put option, maturing in 5 years, allowing them to sell the non-voting preferred shares to Veolia Environnement at an average strike price based on a price adjusted by an annual yield of 5.5%.

The put options concern unlisted companies for which the fair value cannot be determined with sufficient reliability. No impairment losses had been identified in respect of these put options as of December 31, 2005.


Replacement obligation

The Group and its water and heat distribution subsidiaries, as part of their contractual obligations under concession contracts and in return for the revenue they receive, assume responsibility for the replacement of assets of the publicly-owned utility networks they manage. The Group estimates future expenditure required in this regard over the remaining term of the relevant contracts at €2.3 billion (€1.8 billion for Water and €0.5 billion for Energy Services). This expenditure will either be expensed immediately or amortized over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the assets concerned or the contract period, according to the contract terms.


Performance bonds issued for US subsidiaries

Insurance companies have issued performance guarantees in connection with the activities of the Group’s US subsidiaries (operating guarantees, site restoration guarantees), which have been underwritten by Veolia Environnement up to a maximum amount of $1.4 billion (drawn $0.2 billion at December 31, 2005).


Specific Berlin contract commitments

Under the Berlin water contract, the Group may be obliged to purchase rights of passage for water pipes from land owners who present claims for payments.landowners. The cost togross amount of this investment could reach €426 million (50%), approximately €175 million of which would be borne by the Berlin Lander, representing a net commitment of €250 million. In the event of acquisition of these rights by landowners, the amounts paid would be recorded in operating financial assets in the Group could total €610 million (50%).balance sheet, net and remunerated under the contract.


Agreements with EDF

Veolia Environnement granted to EDF a call option forcovering all of its Dalkia shares supposing thatin the event an EDF competitor takes control of the company. Likewise EDF granted to Veolia Environnement a call option forcovering all of its Dalkia shares, supposing thatexercisable in the event of a change in the legal status of EDF status changes and aVeoliaor should a Veolia Environnement competitor, acting alone or together, takesin concert, take control of EDF. Failing an agreement on the share transfer price, the latterthis would be decided by an expert.


Breakdown by maturity of specific commitments given


Specific commitments given(€ million)

As of December 31,2004

As of December 31, 2005

Maturity

 

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Southern Water Put

312

321

-

321

-

Water replacement obligations

1,756

1,819

381

759

679

Dalkia replacement obligations

530

535

68

335

132

Performance bonds issued by VE for US subsidiaries

147

145

3

-

142

Specific Berlin contract commitment (50%)

610

610

5

374

231

Specific commitments given

3,355

3,430

457

1,789

1,184

(€ million)


As of December 31,
2005

As of December 31,
2006

As of December 31,
2007

Maturity

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Southern Water Put

321

-

-

-

-

Specific Berlin contract commitment (50%)

610

426

426

102

324

-

Specific commitments given

931

426

426

102

324

-




F-123



Back to Contents


Other commitments given


Other commitments and contingencies include neither cash and other collateralscollateral guarantees supporting borrowings (see note 43)Note 39) nor specific commitments and contingencies described above.




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-42



Back to contents


Other commitments and contingencies are as follows:


(€ million)

As of December 31,2004

As of December 31, 2005

Maturity

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2007

Maturity

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

     

Operational guarantees

2,713.9

2,963.5

548.5

1,462.0

953.0

(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2007

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

852.9

2,588.4

2,150.1

Financial guarantees

      

 

  

Debt guarantees

154.6

250.8

55.5

99.5

95.8

250.8

300.7

355.6

128.3

153.9

73.4

Warranty obligations given

488.7

515.5

13.8

164.1

337.6

Vendor warranties received

515.5

448.6

480.0

140.6

198.0

141.4

Commitments given

      

 

 

 

Obligations to buy

101.0

94.6

20.6

64.9

9.1

Obligations to sell

28.5

8.6

8.6

-

-

Purchase commitments

94.6

149.3

589.9

445.0

109.1

35.8

Sales commitments

8.6

31.3

27.2

9.8

15.4

2.0

Other commitments given

      

 

 

 

Letters of credit

578.5

819.7

282.0

515.8

21.9

819.7

904.5

573.8

327.7

241.1

5.0

Other commitments given

807.0

772.2

160.6

336.5

275.1

772.2

749.8

383.5

177.0

74.3

132.2

Other commitments given

4,872.2

5,424.9

1,089.6

2,642.8

1,692.5

5,569.8

6,627.8

8,001.4

2,081.3

3,380.2

2,539.9


Operational guarantees:in the course of their normal activities, the Group's subsidiaries give guarantees to their customers. If the company does not reach its specified targets, it may have to pay penalties. This commitment is often guaranteed by an insurance company, a financial institution, or the parent company of the Group. These guarantees included in the contract are performance commitments. The insurance company or the financial institution often requires counter guarantees from the parent company. The commitment is the amount of the guarantee anticipated in the contract and given by the parent company to the customer or the counter guarantee given by the parent company to the insurance company or to the financial institution.


Insurance companies have issued performance bonds in connection with the activities of the Group’s US subsidiaries (operating guarantees, site restoration guarantees), which have been underwritten by Veolia Environnement up to a maximum amount of U.S.$1.4 billion (drawn U.S.$0.2 billion as of December 31, 2007).

Debt guarantees: these relate to guarantees given to financial institutions in connection with the financial debt of non-consolidated companies, equity associates, or proportionately consolidated companies.


Warranty obligations given:Vendor warranties: these include guaranteeswarranties linked to the sale in 2004 of Water activities in the United States for €368 million andin the saleamount of Connex Transport UK Ltd for €24.9€292 million.


Obligations to buy:Purchase commitments: these include commitments given by Group companies to purchase shares in other companies or to invest. As of December 31, 20052007, these commitments mainly concerned the Energy Services Division (€225 million), the Environmental Services Division (€182 million), the Transportation Division (€18.8 million), the Waste Management Division (€43.8103.5 million) and the Water Division (€19.879 million).


Letters of creditcredit:: letters of credit delivered by financial institutions to Group creditors, customers and suppliers guaranteeing operating activities.


The impact of changes in the appreciation of the USU.S. dollar exchange rate on commitments and contingencies is approximately +€160-€229.9 million and mainly concerns the Water Division.Division (-€94.3 million) and Veolia Environnement (-€72.7 million).



F-124



Back to Contents


Other commitments and contingencies given break down by divisionDivision as follows:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

 

As of December 31, 2004

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

   

Water

2,388.4

 

2,334.5

4,368.3

3,253.2

2,388.4

Waste Management

715.2

 

645.2

Environmental Services

1,171.1

876.7

715.2

Energy Services

541.6

 

497.7

755.7

543.0

541.6

Transportation

274.4

 

216.7

398.3

294.9

274.4

Proactiva

10.3

 

12.9

39.8

5.7

10.3

Holding companies

1,439.8

 

1,131.1

1,241.5

1,598.3

1,584.7

Other

55.2

 

34.1

26.7

56.0

55.2

Total

5,424.9

 

4,872.2

8,001.4

6,627.8

5,569.8


The increase in commitments given in the Water Division is mainly due to new construction contracts won in the Middle East and Australia by the Water Division and the impact of new acquisitions during the year.

Lease contracts entered into by the Group are analyzed in Note 39.


Notes 18 and 35.

Litigation (not accounted for)


The Group is subject to various litigation in the normal course of its business. Although it is not possible to predict the outcome of such litigation with certainty, management considers, inIn accordance with IAS 37 criteria, thatmanagement does not consider it appropriate to record a provision is not necessaryin respect of these litigations at the balance sheet date.


date, due to the uncertain nature of their outcome.  

Commitments received


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

 

Guarantees received

1,759.1

1,031.3

1,459.7

951.3

1,128.6

Debt guarantees

190.5

101.8

266.6

171.0

190.5

Warranty obligations received

27.4

30.2

Vendor warranties received

53.6

34.6

27.4

Other guarantees received

1,541.2*

899.3

1,139.5

745.7

910.7


* Including €630.5 millionThe increase in these commitments is due to commitments received from our partners in respect of commitments under electricityconstruction contracts with EDF and €566.9 million in respect of greenhouse gas emission allowances for 2006 (€283.4 million) and 2007 (€283.4 million).

The change in commitments received compared to December 31, 2004 is mainly due to commitments in respect of greenhouse gas emission allowances for 2006 and 2007 in the Energy Services Division (applicationMiddle East and new acquisitions of the Kyoto protocol from 2005)period.

In addition, the Group has undrawn medium and short-term credit lines and syndicated loans in the amount of €567 million.


€5 billion (see Note 30.2)

Note 43

F-125



Back to Contents


NOTE 39.


Cash and other collateralsCollateral given supporting borrowings


As of December 31, 2005, €9062007, €634 million in borrowingsof collateral guarantees was supported by collateral guarantees.given supporting borrowings. The breakdown by type of asset is as follows (in million of euro) € million):


Type of pledge/mortgage

Amount pledged (a)

Total balance sheet amount (b)

Corresponding % (a) / (b)

On intangible assets

2

1,172

0.17%

On property, plant and equipment

461

12,352

3.73%

On financial assets *

408

-

-

Total non-current assets

871

-

-

On current assets

35

13,542

0.26%

Total assets

906

-

-

*

As financial assets pledged as collateral are essentially shares of consolidated subsidiaries, the ratio is not significant.

Type of pledge / mortgage

Amount pledged (a)

Total balance sheet amount (b)

Corresponding %

(a) / (b)

Intangible assets

2

1,706

0.10%

Property, plant and equipment

293

9,203

3.18%

Financial assets (*)

313

-

 

Total non-current assets

608

-

-

Current assets

26

17,214

0.15%

Total assets

634

-

-

*

As the majority of financial assets pledged as collateral are shares of consolidated subsidiaries, the ratio is not significant.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-43



Back to contents


The breakdown by maturity is as follows:


(€ million)

As of December 31,2004

As of December 31, 2005

Maturity

  

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

      

Intangible assets

1

2

 

2

 

Property, plant and equipment

253

461

58

171

232

Mortgage pledge

92

92

-

-

92

Other PP&E  mortgage pledge(1)

161

369

58

171

140

Financial assets

374

408

58

69

281

VW Korean Co Hynix(2) (4)

47

28

28

-

-

Chengdu(2) (4)

47

49

2

7

40

VW Korean Daesan(3) (4)

35

24

24

-

-

Samsung VW Inchon(2) (4)

48

65

4

23

38

Defluent(2) (4)

40

74

-

25

49

Cle Brazil

16

14

-

14

-

Crivina(2) (4)

26

34

-

-

34

Shenzhen(2) (4)

89

105

-

-

105

PPC(2)

9

-

-

-

-

Connex Regiobahn

9

6

-

-

6

Taitung(2) (5)

3

4

-

-

4

Technoborgo(2) (4)

5

5

-

-

5

Current assets

38

35

5

10

20

Pledges on trade receivables

24

32

3

10

19

Pledges on inventories

14

3

2

-

1

Total

666

906

121

252

533

(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2007

Maturing in

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Intangible assets

2

2

2

-

2

-

Property, plant and equipment

461

390

293

64

173

56

Mortgage pledge

92

80

15

12

3

-

Other PP&E mortgage pledge(1)

369

310

278

52

170

56

Financial assets(2)

408

389

313

20

152

141

Current assets

35

23

26

9

17

-

Pledges on receivables

32

21

23

7

16

-

Pledges on inventories

3

2

3

2

1

-

Total

906

804

634

93

344

197

(1)

mainly equipment and traveling systems.

(2)

 including non-consolidated investments of €196 million and other financial assets of €117 million as of December 31, 2007.

(1)



mainly equipment and traveling systems.F-126

(2)


100% of equity pledged as collateral.Back to Contents

(3)

95% of equity pledged as collateral.

(4)

Consolidated company as of December 31, 2005.

(5)

Equity associate as of December 31, 2005.



Note 44NOTE 40.

Related party transactions


Relations with Vivendi Universal


On December 24, 2004,The share capital of Veolia Environnement acquired 8,128,440 Veolia Environnement shares from Vivendi Universal for €194.8 million.

is widely held. As of December 31, 2005, Vivendi Universal owneda result, certain shareholders holding only 5.3%a small percentage of the share capital of Veolia Environnement.

As former majority shareholder, Vivendi Universal granted a number of guarantees in favor of Veolia Environnement which have been transferred. The maximum amount of guarantees not yet transferred totaled €15.7 million as of December 31, 2005.

For the purposes of its telephone network, Veolia Environnement has two contracts with SFR and NeufCegetel which were entered into on an arm’s length basis.


are nonetheless considered related parties.

Relations with BNP Paribas (1.8% of(1.03% interest in the share capital), Société Générale (2% interest in Veolia Environnement)1 and Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations (8.8%(10.36% interest in Veolia Environnement)the share capital)


Management of these three shareholder financial groups is represented on the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement.

Veolia Environnement has financing relations with these three institutions comprising global financing arrangements (syndicated loans, bilateral credit lines), structured financing (“("Dailly law”law" discounting of receivables, and securitization program Southern Water and financing of the automobile pool) and cash management. Relations are remunerated at market rates.


In addition, Veolia Environnement signed a guarantee contract with Société Générale pursuant to the share capital increase detailed in the “Key events” note. This contract was signed on June 11, 2007 and authorized by the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement on June 10, 2007 as a related party agreement €13.5 million was paid to Société Générale under this contract.

RegardingVivendi Universal undertook to pay an indemnity to Veolia Environnement in respect of the financial management of replacement expenses Vivendi Universal committed itself to pay an indemnity to the company but itand then transferred this obligation to the Société Générale byunder a perfect delegation contract ofon December 21, 2004. ConsequentlyAs such, Vivendi Universal no longer has no more commitment towardsan obligation to Veolia Environnement‘s replacement expenses. On the orher hand, theEnvironnement with respect thereto.

Conversely, Société Générale, holder of 2% of share capital and considered to beas a related party, owesis liable to Veolia Environnement in this respect for a maximum indemnity for €136.3amount of €59.0 million as of December 31, 2005, payable2007, which may be claimed each year untilup to 2010 according tounder the contract terms. Forconditions laid down in the year 2005, contract.

Veolia Environnement asked theclaimed an amount of €39.6 million from Société Générale for an amountin respect of €36.2 million.2007.


Relations with Electricité de France (4%(3.88% interest in Veolia Environnement)


EDF Group has a 4%3.88% interest in Veolia Environnement, a 34% interest in Dalkia and a 25% direct interest in Dalkia International.

In accordance with the Decree 97-07, Decree., EDF purchases electricity produced in France by Dalkia cogeneration power plants at a guaranteed fixed price for 2005/2006.2006/2007. Electricity sold by Dalkia to EDF in 20042005, 2006 and 20052007 totaled €414.8€455.0 million, €482.6 million and €455.0€521.7 million respectively.


Relations with EBRD

The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) holds minority interests in Group operating entities in Central Europe, primarily in the Energy Services, Transportation and Water Divisions. In 2007, the EBRD subscribed to a reserved share capital increase in the amount of €90.4 million, performed by the subsidiary holding the Water Division’s investments in Central and Eastern Europe (10% of the share capital).


1 Société Générale no longer holds Veolia Environnement share capital as of 12/31/2007, but held 1.16% of the share capital as of 07/31/2007.



F-127



Back to Contents


Relations with proportionately consolidated companies

Veolia Environnement granted a loan of €986 million to Dalkia International, proportionately consolidated by Dalkia at 75.81%. The non-group portion of this loan is recorded in assets in the Group consolidated balance sheet (Other non-current financial assets) in the amount of €238.7 million.

 With respect to the Berlin water services company acquisition debt, Veolia Environnement guaranteed the debts issued by RVB, proportionately consolidated at 50%, in the amount of €675 million.

In addition, given the Group’s businesses, operating flows between companies are generally limited to companies operating in the same country. As such, the level of operating transactions between the Group and proportionately consolidated companies is not material.

However, certain contractual agreements, notably in Asia and Central Europe, impose the existence of a holding company (generally equity accounted or proportionately consolidated) and companies carrying the operating contract (generally fully consolidated). These complex legal arrangements generate “asset provision” flows between the companies jointly controlled or subject to significant influence and the companies controlled by the Group. Assets are generally provided for a specific remuneration that may or may not include the maintenance of the installations in good working order or the technical improvement of the installations.


Compensation of Executive Committee members and directors

Members of the Group Executive Committee represent the key management personnel of the Group.


Compensation of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

The following tableschedule presents the total gross compensation (fixed and variable compensation, directors’directors' fees and employee benefits) paid to Henri Proglio during 20042005, 2006 and 2005.2007.


(in € )

Compensation

Directors fees’ paid by controlled companies

 Employee benefits(1)

Total gross compensation

Fixed

Variable

VE directors’ fees

Compensation paid in 2004

900,000

473,620(2)

24,517

70,395

3,898

1,472,430

Compensation paid in 2005

944,996

850,000(3)

34,000

70,912

2,616

1,902,524

a.

Company car

b.

Variable compensation paid in 2004 in respect of 2003.

c.

Variable compensation paid in 2005 in respect of 2004.

 (in euros)

Compensation

Directors fees' paid by controlled companies

Benefits in kind(4)

Total gross compensation

Fixed

Variable

VE directors' fees

Compensation paid in 2005

944,996

850,000(1)

34,000

70,912

2,616

1,902,524

Compensation paid in 2006

944,996

1,062,500(2)

38,250

66,382

2,666

2,114,794

Compensation paid in 2007

992,000

1,275,000(3)

40,000

64,079

2,954

2,374,033

(1)

Variable compensation paid in 2005 in respect of 2004.

(2)

Variable compensation paid in 2006 in respect of 2005.

(3)

Variable compensation paid in 2007 in respect of 2006.

(4)

Company car


Henri ProglioThe Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is a member of the supplementary defined contribution collective pension plan granted tofor Group Executive management.Management and the Executive Committee supplementary defined benefit collective pension plan set up in 2006.

Compensation of Directors (excluding the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer)

Directors' fees paid to Directors, excluding the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, totaled €648,186.25.




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-44F-128



Back to contentsContents



Directors

Directors’ fees paid in 2005 totaled €595,522.


Compensation of Executive Committee members compensation (excluding the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer)(1)

 (in euros)

Fixed compensation

Variable compensation

Total compensation

Compensation paid in 2005

2,393,989

1,539,360(2)

3,933,349

Compensation paid in 2006

2,431,494

1,950,000(3)

4,381,494

Compensation paid in 2007

2,160,041

2,109,478(4)

4,269,519

(1)

Executive Committee members as of December 31, 2007.

(2)

Variable compensation paid in 2005 in respect of 2004.

(3)

Variable compensation paid in 2006 in respect of 2005.

(4)

Variable compensation paid in 2007 in respect of 2006.


 

Fixed compensation

Variable compensation

Total compensation

Compensation paid in 2004

2,280,000

1,048,800(1)

3,328,800

Compensation paid in 2005

2,393,989

1,539,360(2)

3,933,349

(1)

Including variableProfit sharing compensation, not included in the above amounts, of €30,000 was paid in 2004June 2007 in respect of 2003.2006.

(2)

Including variable compensation paid in 2005Members of the Company’s Executive Committee also received total directors' fees of €203,308, in respect of 2004.their duties in Veolia Environnement Group companies, in France and abroad.


Share purchase and subscription options

Share purchasesubscription or subscriptionpurchase options granted to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in 2005 and2007: 110,000

Share subscription or purchase options exercised duringby the year: NilChairman and Chief Executive Officer in 2007: 299,733


Share purchasesubscription or subscriptionpurchase options granted to Executive Committee members (excluding the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer) in 2005 and2007: 220,000

Share subscription or purchase options exercised duringby Executive Committee members (excluding the year: Nil


Relations with investments accounted for using the proportionate consolidation method


Veolia Environnement granted a loan of €99.3 million to Dalkia International, proportionately consolidated at 75.79%.


As part of the refinancing of the Berlin water services company acquisition debt, Veolia Environnement guaranteedChairman and Chief Executive Officer) in the amount of €675 million the obligations of RVB, proportionately consolidated at 50%.2007: 254,187


Note 45NOTE 41.


Consolidated employees

Consolidated employees


Consolidated employees* * break down as follows:


By category

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

Executives

24,523

25,350

Employees

217,104

210,171

Consolidated employees

241,627

235,521

By category

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Consolidated employees*

284,072

260,088

241,627


* Consolidated employees is equal

F-129



Back to the average number of full-time equivalent employees. Employees of proportionately consolidated companies are included in the percentage of consolidation. Employees of equity associates are not included.Contents



By Division

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

Water

62,599

58,801

Waste Management

69,012

66,923

Energy Services

39,429

36,767

Transportation

66,089

54,726

Proactiva

4,084

3,755

FCC

-

14,148

Other

414

401

Consolidated employees

241,627

235,521


By method of consolidation

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

Fully consolidated companies

208,072

191,579

Proportionately consolidated companies

33,555

43,942

Consolidated employees*

241,627

235,521

By Division

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Water

74,280

65,246

62,599

Environmental Services

84,994

78,951

69,012

Energy Services

46,387

42,651

39,429

Transportation

73,299

69,320

66,089

Proactiva

4,503

3,399

4,084

FCC

-

-

-

Other

609

521

414

Consolidated employees*

284,072

260,088

241,627


*

By company

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Fully consolidated companies

241,857

222,634

208,072

Proportionately consolidated companies

42,215

37,454

33,555

Consolidated employees*

284,072

260,088

241,627

    

*

Consolidated employees is equal to the average number of full-time equivalent employees. Employees of proportionately consolidated companies are included in the percentage of consolidation. Employees of equity associates are not included.


In 2004, FCC exited

The increase in the consolidation scope on June 30, 2004 (included 50% for 6 monthsnumber of employees in 2007 is mainly due to the signature of new Chinese contracts (average number of employees in 2007 = 1,835) in the Water Division, to the acquisition of the year)Sulo Group (average number of employees in 2007 = 3,959) in the Environmental Services Division and since then Proactiva is accounted for usingto SNCM, where employee numbers increased by 1,007 (full year effect), in the proportionate consolidation method.Transportation Division.


Note 46NOTE 42.


Greenhouse gas emission rights


The rise in greenhouse gases in the atmosphere led certain States and the international community to introduce regulatory provisions to limit further increases. At an international level, the Kyoto protocol, finalized in 1997, came into effect in February 2005.2005, for the period 2008-2012. At a European level, the European Union decided to implement, via Directive 2003/87/EC of October 13, 2003, a trading system for carbon gas emission allowances.rights. This trading system came into effect at the beginning of 2005.2005 and covers the period 2008-2012.


Group allowances granted, sold or consumed during 2005 break down as follows:


Volume in thousands of tones

As of January 1, 2005

Granted

Purchased / sold

Consumed

As of December 31, 2005

France

-

4,334.5

(1,184.6)

(3,020.3)

129.6

Czech Republic

-

3,811.1

(250.1)

(3,405.6)

155.4

Poland

-

3,598.9

-

(3,308.0)

290.9

Lithuania

-

1,739.1

-

(903.1)

836.0

Estonia

-

393.5

(189.5)

(169.5)

34.5

Germany

 

1,200.3

20.0

(1,349.6)

(129.3)

Other

-

340.1

-

(323.0)

17.1

Total

-

15,417.5

(1,604.2)

(12,479.1)

1,334.2


The Group’s operations can be described as “normal”.

Based on expected future greenhouse gas emissions,In this context, the Group does not expect(primarily the Energy Services Division) was allocated CO2 emission rights by the different Member States of the European Union, covering the 3-year period from 2005 to be in a negative position in the medium-term.2007, known as phase 1.

Income from the sale of 1,604.2 thousand tons of greenhouse gas emission allowances totaled €35.9 million.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-45F-130



Back to contentsContents


InThe position in 2007 is as follows:

Volume in thousands of metric tons





As of January 1, 2007

Entries into the consolidation scope

Granted

Purchased / sold

Consumed

As of December 31, 2007

Total

987

203

16,029

(3, 981)

(12,165)

1,073


The balance as of January 1, 2007 takes into account allowances consumed in 2006 and surrendered in February 2007.

Entries into the scope of consolidation concern Dalkia acquisitions in Europe.

By optimizing installations and climatic conditions, the Group was able to generate surpluses. It was then able to create value from these surpluses by entering into forward sale transactions and swaps classified as trading transactions in accordance with contract terms and conditions, a portion of the allowances sold involved the retrocession of allowances to customers  for €13 million in 2005.accounting standards.

A provision was recorded in respect of the allowance deficit in Germany.

Based on a market price of €21.5 as of December 31, 2005, excess emission allowances after consumption of 1,334.2 thousandsNote that residual phase 1 rights are estimated at 1,073 thousand metric tons of greenhouse gas canemission rights based on the consumption of 12,165 thousand metric tons of greenhouse gas emission rights in 2007 and that this balance cannot be valuedcarried forward to future periods.

Phase II rights (2008-2012) are estimated at €28.7 million, before a possible retrocession to customers.€494 million.


Note 47

NOTE 43.

Segment information


reporting

Pursuant to IAS 14, Veolia Environnement provides primary information by business segment and secondary information by geographical area. The business segments are Water, Waste Management,Environmental Services, Energy Services and Transportation.


TheWater segmentintegrates segmentintegrates drinking water and wastewater activities such as water distribution, water and wastewater treatment, industrial process water, manufacturing of water treatment equipment and systems.


TheWaste ManagementEnvironmental Services segment collects, processes and disposes of household, trade and industrial waste.


TheEnergy Services segmentincludes heating production and distribution, energy optimization and related services, and electricity production.


TheTransportation segment focuses on the operation of passenger transportation services, both road and rail networks.services.





F-131



Back to Contents


Business segments


Revenue by segment
(€ million)

For the year ended December 31,

2005

2004

   

Water

8,888.7

7,777.4

Waste Management

6,604.1

6,214.4

Energy Services

5,402.4

4,919.8

Transportation

4,349.7

3,588.7

Revenue as per consolidated income statement

25,244.9

22,500.3


Inter-segment revenue
(€ million)

For the year ended December 31,

2005

2004

   

Water

10.0

6.7

Waste Management

55.9

42.3

Energy Services

29.7

28.4

Transportation

5.1

5.0

Inter-segment revenue

100.7

82.4

Revenue by segment

(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Water

10,927.4

10,087.6

9,134.2

Environmental Services

9,214.3

7,462.9

6,748.7

Energy Services

6,896.4

6,118.4

5,463.6

Transportation

5,590.1

4,951.5

4,223.9

Revenue as per the consolidated income statement

32,628.2

28,620.4

25,570.4



Operating income by segment
(€ million)

For the year ended December 31,

2005

2004

   

Water

1,007.3

799.5

Waste Management

530.5

467.5

Energy Services

326.1

250.3

Transportation

114.1

31.4

Total business segments

1,978.0

1,548.7

Unallocated operating income

(85.1)

(68.1)

Operating income as per consolidated income statement

1,892.9

1,480.6

Inter-segment revenue

(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Water

25.5

19.4

10.0

Environmental Services

80.9

68.4

55.9

Energy Services

47.6

36.2

29.7

Transportation

5.4

5.9

5.1

Inter-segment revenue

159.4

129.9

100.7



Net charge to operating depreciation, amortization and provisions by segment
(€ million)

For the year ended December 31,

2005

2004

   

Water

(534.3)

(440.1)

Waste Management

(523.4)

(552.5)

Energy Services

(161.9)

(64.8)

Transportation

(170.5)

(232.9)

Total business segments

(1,390.1)

(1,290.3)

Unallocated net charge to operating depreciation, amortization and provisions

(60.1)

(41.2)

Net charge to operating depreciation, amortization and provisions

(1,450.2)

(1,331.5)



Impairment losses by segment as of December 31, 2005
(€ million)

Water

Waste Manage-ment

Energy Services

Transport-ation

Unallocated amounts

Total

Impairment losses recognized in equity

-

-

-

-

-

-

Reversals of impairment losses recognized in equity

-

-

-

-

-

-

Equity impact

-

-

-

-

-

-

Impairment losses recognized in net income

(107.5)

(48.0)

(63.9)

(6.0)

(11.6)

(237.0)

Reversals of impairment losses recognized in net income

90.9

42.2

39.5

5.1

6.8

184.5

Net income impact

(16.6)

(5.8)

(24.4)

(0.9)

(4.8)

(52.5)

Operating income by segment

(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Water

1,267.7

1,160.6

1,002.3

Environmental Services

803.5

648.3

543.6

Energy Services

398.7

377.7

315.3

Transportation

130.3

13.6

116.8

Total business segments

2,600.2

2,200.2

1,978.0

Unallocated operating income

(103.3)

(67.3)

(85.1)

Operating income as per the consolidated income statement

2,496.9

2,132.9

1,892.9





VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-46F-132



Back to contentsContents





Impairment losses by segment as of December 31, 2004
(€ million)

Water

Waste Manage-ment

Energy Services

Transport-ation

Unallocated amounts

Total

Impairment losses recognized in equity

-

-

-

-

-

-

Reversals of impairment losses recognized in equity

-

-

-

-

-

-

Equity impact

-

-

-

-

-

-

Impairment losses recognized in net income

(103.1)

(34.7)

(41.2)

(74.1)

(10.1)

(263.2)

Reversals of impairment losses recognized in net income

105.2

40.8

31.1

4.8

5.5

187.4

Net income impact

2.1

6.1

(10.1)

(69.3)

(4.6)

(75.8)

Net charge to operating depreciation, amortization and provisions by segment

(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Water

(396.0)

(436.3)

(420.9)

Environmental Services

(696.8)

(529.4)

(496.4)

Energy Services

(150.2)

(122.9)

(155.4)

Transportation

(189.9)

(293.2)

(160.4)

Total business segments

(1,432.9)

(1,381.8)

(1,233.1)

Unallocated net charge to operating depreciation, amortization and provisions

(29.4)

(28.0)

(59.4)

Net charge to operating depreciation, amortization and provisions

(1,462.3)

(1,409.8)

(1,292.5)



Share of net income of associates by segmen
t
€ million)

For the year ended December 31,

2005

2004

   

Water

10.8

6.7

Waste Management

1.6

9.8

Energy Services

1.9

4.2

Transportation

0.6

(1.5)

Total business segments

14.9

19.2

Unallocated share of net income of associates

-

5.0

Share of net income of associates as per consolidated income statement

14.9

24.2

Impairment losses by segment for the year ended December 31, 2007

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Unallocated amounts

Total

Impairment losses recognized in equity

-

-

-

-

-

-

Reversals of impairment losses recognized in equity

-

-

-

-

-

-

Equity impact

-

-

-

-

-

-

Impairment losses recognized in net income

(110.8)

(68.4)

(19.5)

(39.1)

(6.6)

(244.4)

Reversals of impairment losses recognized in net income

105.4

32.6

38.0

12.1

3.3

191.4

Net income impact

(5.4)

(35.8)

18.5

(27.0)

(3.3)

(53.0)



Assets by segment as of December 31, 2005
(€ million)

Water

Waste Manage-ment

Energy Services

Transport-ation

Unallocated amounts

Total assets in the consolidated balance sheet

Goodwill, net

2,052.4

1,527.7

836.3

446.7

-

4,863.1

Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, net

7,488.3

3,566.6

1,203.9

1,148.6

115.6

13,523.0

Working capital assets

5,168.3

2,343.4

3,140.5

989.9

243.6

11,885.7

Total segment assets

14,709.0

7,437.7

5,180.7

2,585.2

359.2

30,271.8

Investments in associates

131.4

53.8

10.6

5.7

-

201.5

Other assets

    

5,836.1

5,836.1

Total assets

14,840.4

7,491.5

5,191.3

2,590.9

6,195.3

36,309.4

Impairment losses by segment for the year ended December 31, 2006

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Unallocated amounts

Total

Impairment losses recognized in equity

-

-

-

-

-

-

Reversals of impairment losses recognized in equity

-

-

-

-

-

-

Equity impact

-

-

-

-

-

-

Impairment losses recognized in net income

(107.6)

(38.8)

(34.1)

(81.6)

(7.2)

(269.3)

Reversals of impairment losses recognized in net income

74.0

38.7

44.8

8.3

5.5

171.3

Net income impact

(33.6)

(0.1)

10.7

73.3

1.7

(98.0)



Assets by segment as of December 31, 2004
(€ million)

Water

Waste Manage-ment

Energy Services

Transport-ation

Unallocated amounts

Total assets in the consolidated balance sheet

Goodwill, net

1,914.9

1,403.6

762.9

302.2

-

4,383.6

Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, net

6,656.6

3,142.9

1,068.3

1,050.0

99.5

12,017.3

Working capital assets

4,446.6

2,188.4

2,874.3

809.5

626.7

10,945.5

Total segment assets

13,018.1

6,734.9

4,705.5

2,161.7

726.2

27,346.4

Investments in associates

123.4

59.9

10.4

4.9

20.6

219.2

Other assets

    

8,260.3

8,260.3

Total assets

13,141.5

6,794.8

4,715.9

2,166.6

9,007.1

35,825.9



Liabilities by segment as of December 31, 2005
(€ million)

Water

Waste Management

Energy Services

Transport-ation

Unallocated amounts

Total liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet

Provisions for contingencies and losses

1,023.0

573.2

509.3

155.4

126.4

2,387.3

Working capital liabilities

5,792.3

2,080.6

2,356.4

1,162.7

106.4

11,498.4

Other segment liabilities

272.8

36.9

45.3

8.5

(1.1)

362.4

Total segment liabilities

7,088.1

2,690.7

2,911.0

1,326.6

231.7

14,248.1

Other liabilities

    

22,061.3

22,061.3

Total liabilities

7,088.1

2,690.7

2,911.0

1,326.6

22,293.0

36,309.4



Liabilities by segment as of December 31, 2004
(€ million)

Water

Waste Manage-ment

Energy Services

Transport-ation

Unallocated amounts

Total liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet

Provisions for contingencies and losses

843.6

518.0

447.9

120.2

76.9

2,006.6

Working capital liabilities

5,267.1

1,920.3

2,143.7

1,018.9

160.3

10,510.3

Other segment liabilities

113.5

32.4

36.3

4.5

166.9

353.6

Total segment liabilities

6,224.2

2,470.7

2,627.9

1,143.6

404.1

12,870.5

Other liabilities

    

22,955.4

22,955.4

Total liabilities

6,224.2

2,470.7

2,627.9

1,143.6

23,359.5

35,825.9


Capital expenditure by segment
(€ million)

For the year ended December 31,

2005

2004

   

Water

912

861

Waste Management

739

710

Energy Services

252

247

Transportation

195

153

Total segment capital expenditure

2,098

1,971





VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-47F-133



Back to contentsContents



Impairment losses by segment for the year ended December 31, 2005

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Unallocated amounts

Total

Impairment losses recognized in equity

-

-

-

-

-

-

Reversals of impairment losses recognized in equity

-

-

-

-

-

-

Equity impact

-

-

-

-

-

-

Impairment losses recognized in net income

(107.5)

(45.4)

(63.9)

(6.0)

(11.6)

(234.4)

Reversals of impairment losses recognized in net income

90.9

42.2

39.5

5.1

6.8

184.5

Net income impact

(16.6)

(3.2)

(24.4)

(0.9)

(4.8)

(49.9)



Share of net income of associates by segment

(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Water

3.3

3.4

2.4

Environmental Services

3.3

(3.8)

1.6

Energy Services

3.1

2.6

1.9

Transportation

7.2

3.8

0.6

Total business segments

16.9

6.0

6.5

Unallocated share of net income of associates

-

-

-

Share of net income of associates as per the consolidated income statement

16.9

6.0

6.5



Capital expenditure by segment

(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Water

866.0

853.0

771.0

Environmental Services

846.0

692.0

639.0

Energy Services

429.0

318.0

252.0

Transportation

459.0

302.0

193.0

Total capital expenditure

2,600.0

2,165.0

1,855.0





F-134



Back to Contents



Assets by segment as of December 31, 2007

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Unallocated amounts

Total assets in the consolidated balance sheet

Goodwill, net

2,208.2

3,049.5

1,098.1

556.7

0.7

6,913.2

Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, net

5,658.3

4,292.4

2,112.0

1,694.2

141.9

13,898.8

Operating financial assets

3,884.5

902.4

712.3

123.0

5.4

5,627.6

Working capital assets including DTA

5,847.8

3,257.4

3,755.2

1,321.1

585.4

14,766.9

Total segment assets

17,598.8

11,501.7

7,677.6

3,695.0

733.4

41,206.5

Investments in associates

137.2

75.5

25.5

53.9

-

292.1

Other unallocated assets

 

 

 

 

4,808.3 *

4,808.3

Total assets

17,736.0

11,577.2

7,703.1

3,748.9

5,541.7

46,306.9

*

Including Assets classified as held for sale of €122.5 million (Transportation Division for €103.9 million and Environmental Services Division for €18.6 million).



Assets by segment as of December 31, 2006

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Unallocated amounts

Total assets in the consolidated balance sheet

Goodwill, net

2,029.3

2,294.0

839.2

543.2

(0.7)

5,705.0

Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, net

5,142.5

3,492.1

1,309.5

1,570.0

130.0

11,644.1

Operating financial assets

3,830.5

737.0

771.1

115.4

5.6

5,459.6

Working capital assets including DTA

5,260.3

2,670.9

3,357.7

1,213.2

554.1

13,056.2

Total segment assets

16,262.6

9,194.0

6,277.5

3,441.8

689.0

35,864.9

Investments in associates

130.7

44.4

19.6

46.3

-

241.0

Other unallocated assets

    

4,017.8*

4,017.8

Total assets

16,393.3

9,238.4

6,297.1

3,488.1

4,706.8

40,123.7

*

Including Assets classified as held for sale of €67.3 million (Transportation Division for €42.3 million and Environmental Services Division for €25 million).




F-135



Back to Contents



Assets by segment as of December 31, 2005

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Unallocated amounts

Total assets in the consolidated balance sheet

Goodwill, net

1,942.5

1,527.7

836.3

446.7

(0.9)

4,752.3

Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, net

4,699.0

3,157.7

1,171.5

1,121.0

109.7

10,258.9

Operating financial assets

3,863.3

749.2

822.1

104.4

6.4

5,545.4

Working capital assets including DTA

5,181.4

2,298.1

3,137.6

993.5

243.6

11,854.2

Total segment assets

15,686.2

7,732.7

5,967.5

2,665.6

358.8

32,410.8

Investments in associates

131.4

53.8

10.6

5.7

-

201.5

Other unallocated assets

    

3,768.7*

3,768.7

Total assets

15,817.6

7,786.5

5,978.1

2,671.3

4,127.5

36,381.0

*

Including Assets classified as held for sale of €1.6 million (Environmental Services Division).



Liabilities by segment as of December 31, 2007

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Unallocated amounts

Total liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet

Provisions for contingencies and losses

1,013.9

873.6

476.1

456.7

144.3

2,964.6

Working capital liabilities including DTL

6,855.4

3,138.3

2,996.7

1,544.1

205.0

14,739.5

Other segment liabilities

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total segment liabilities

7,869.3

4,011.9

3,472.8

2,000.8

349.3

17,704.1

Other unallocated liabilities

 

 

 

 

28,602.8 *

28,602.8

Total liabilities

7,869.3

4,011.9

3,472.8

2,000.8

28,952.1

46,306.9

*

Including Liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale of €1.9 million (Veolia Environnement SA).






F-136



Back to Contents



Liabilities by segment as of December 31, 2006

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Unallocated amounts

Total liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet

Provisions for contingencies and losses

1,012.4

791.3

464.0

611.9

142.9

3,022.5

Working capital liabilities including DTL

6,238.8

2,548.9

2,524.1

1,361.0

100.7

12,773.5

Other segment liabilities

273.4

41.6

29.1

12.2

(3.1)

353.2

Total segment liabilities

7,524.6

3,381.8

3,017.2

1,985.1

240.5

16,149.2

Other unallocated liabilities

    

23,974.5*

23,974.5

Total liabilities

7,524.6

3,381.8

3,017.2

1,985.1

24,215.0

40,123.7

*

Including Liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale of €59.4 million (Transportation Division).



Liabilities by segment as of December 31, 2005

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Unallocated amounts

Total liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet

Provisions for contingencies and losses

1,059.0

575.7

476.1

164.0

127.2

2,402.0

Working capital liabilities including DTL

5,849.4

2,084.3

2,373.2

1,161.4

106.5

11,574.8

Other segment liabilities

289.0

36.9

25.1

8.5

(1.2)

358.3

Total segment liabilities

7,197.4

2,696.9

2,874.4

1,333.9

232.5

14,335.1

Other unallocated liabilities

    

22,045.9

22,045.9

Total liabilities

7,197.4

2,696.9

2,874.4

1,333.9

22,278.4

36,381.0


Geographical area


Geographical breakdown of Revenue

Year ended December 31, 2007

(€ million)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Oceania

Asia

Middle East

Rest of the world

Total

Water

4,927.2

1,276.9

573.4

1,413.0

539.3

299.8

732.8

313.9

851.1

10,927.4

Environmental Services

3,332.0

787.9

1,776.0

993.5

1,315.8

430.7

181.4

63.3

333.7

9,214.3

Energy Services

3,852.2

80.5

473.5

2,159.9

15.3

69.1

42.3

52.5

151.1

6,896.4

Transportation

2,144.5

557.6

122.8

1,466.9

710.0

508.6

4.5

17.3

57.9

5,590.1

Revenue

14,255.9

2,702.9

2,945.7

6,033.3

2,580.4

1,308.2

961.0

447.0

1,393.8

32,628.2



F-137


For the year ended December 31, 2005
(€ million)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Oceania

Asia

Rest of the world

Total

Water

4,413.1

1,182.4

434.9

1,092.3

555.0

100.5

409.5

701.0

8,888.7

Waste Management

2,901.0

144.6

730.0

776.3

1,216.4

383.9

146.9

305.0

6,604.1

Energy Services

3,205.6

65.7

367.6

1,650.3

5.0

-

16.7

91.5

5,402.4

Transportation

1,734.0

402.0

8.7

1,389.2

380.1

394.2

-

41.5

4,349.7

Revenue

12,253.7

1,794.7

1,541.2

4,908.1

2,156.5

878.6

573.1

1,139.0

25,244.9


Back to Contents



Year ended December 31, 2006

(€ million)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Oceania

Asia

Rest of the world

Total

Water

4,802.4

1,282.6

552.2

1,279.4

640.8

123.9

578.9

827.4

10,087.6

Environmental Services

3,112.1

151.7

1,135.4

817.2

1,354.2

402.9

167.0

322.4

7,462.9

Energy Services

3,535.4

62.5

426.2

1,899.9

10.3

-

25.0

159.1

6,118.4

Transportation

1,953.1

496.1

73.0

1,321.4

645.0

404.6

-

58.3

4,951.5

Revenue

13,403.0

1,992.9

2,186.8

5,317.9

2,650.3

931.4

770.9

1,367.2

28,620.4



For the year ended December 31, 2004
(€ million)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Oceania

Asia

Rest of the world

Total

Water

4,163.6

757.5

386.6

933.2

496.8

77.4

333.4

628.9

7,777.4

Waste Management

2,834.9

141.6

669.5

729.1

1,122.0

307.4

139.0

270.9

6,214.4

Energy Services

3,001.7

70.4

335.6

1,452.6

0.1

-

11.5

47.9

4,919.8

Transportation

1,476.2

363.3

10.0

1,195.1

263.7

259.2

-

21.2

3,588.7

Revenue

11,476.4

1,332.8

1,401.7

4,310.0

1,882.6

644.0

483.9

968.9

22,500.3


Year ended December 31, 2005

(€ million)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Oceania

Asia

Rest of the world

Total

Water

4,459.4

1,204.5

463.9

1,110.9

581.8

100.5

433.7

779.5

9,134.2

Environmental Services

2,990.1

144.6

861.9

699.9

1,216.4

383.9

146.9

305.0

6,748.7

Energy Services

3,256.5

66.4

367.5

1,657.9

5.0

-

16.7

93.6

5,463.6

Transportation

1,733.2

401.8

33.8

1,239.9

380.1

393.6

-

41.5

4,223.9

Revenue

12,439.2

1,817.3

1,727.1

4,708.6

2,183.3

878.0

597.3

1,219.6

25,570.4


Geographical breakdown of segment assets


As of December 31, 2005(€ million)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Rest of the world

Total

As of December 31, 2007

(€ million)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Rest of the world

Total

Water

5,123.8

4,442.1

1,564.5

1,108.9

696.4

1,773.3

14,709.0

5,559.2

4,510.0

1,914.7

1,999.6

407.0

3,208.3

17,598.8

Waste Management

2,911.5

87.7

1,090.4

691.9

1,902.1

754.1

7,437.7

Environmental Services

3,396.2

1,337.4

2,380.0

1,819.1

1,806.8

762.2

11,501.7

Energy Services

3,774.9

115.8

232.3

2,678.0

661.8

214.8

7,677.6

Transportation

935.3

404.8

14.5

781.6

220.4

228.6

2,585.2

1,748.5

354.3

116.5

846.8

385.0

243.9

3,695.0

Unallocated amounts

322.0

-

20.3

13.4

249.4

128.3

733.4

Segment assets

11,871.7

4,998.3

2,843.8

4,550.8

2,824.9

2,823.1

29,912.6

14,800.8

6,317.5

4,663.8

7,356.9

3,510.0

4,557.5

41,206.5





As of December 31, 2004(€ million)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Rest of the world

Total

Water

4,740.2

3,819.8

1,444.9

1,087.4

356.4

1,569.4

13,018.1

Waste Management

2,749.4

82.4

943.1

715.2

1,577.3

667.5

6,734.9

Energy Services

2,748.1

67.2

144.3

1,721.0

-

24.9

4,705.5

Transportation

817.2

363.6

4.4

729.2

63.4

183.9

2,161.7

Segment assets

11,054.9

4,333.0

2,536.7

4,252.8

1,997.1

2,445.7

26,620.2

F-138



Back to Contents



As of December 31, 2006

(€ million)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Rest of the world

Total

Water

5,145.0

4,427.0

1,706.3

1,769.6

583.3

2,631.4

16,262.6

Environmental Services

3,212.0

89.7

2,503.9

828.5

1,834.1

725.8

9,194.0

Energy Services

3,608.2

87.2

192.2

2,246.5

7.4

136.0

6,277.5

Transportation

1,640.3

348.5

96.6

774.2

354.4

227.8

3,441.8

Segment assets

13,605.5

4,952.4

4,499.0

5,618.8

2,779.2

3,721.0

35,175.9


As of December 31, 2005

(€ million)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Rest of the world

Total

Water

5,137.8

4,430.1

1,574.6

1,429.3

831.8

2,282.6

15,686.2

Environmental Services

3,006.0

87.7

1,247.9

641.0

1,985.0

765.1

7,732.7

Energy Services

3,596.8

64.0

182.6

2,043.1

6.0

75.0

5,967.5

Transportation

995.2

404.0

15.9

801.3

220.4

228.8

2,665.6

Segment assets

12,735.8

4,985.8

3,021.0

4,914.7

3,043.2

3,351.5

32,052.0


Geographical breakdown of capital expenditure


For the year ended December 31, 2005
(€ million)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Rest of the world

Total

Year ended December 31, 2007

(€ million)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Rest of the world

Total

Water

386

173

79

88

21

165

912

414

28

157

83

22

162

866

Waste Management

334

8

145

67

106

79

739

Environmental Services

302

36

101

114

196

97

846

Energy Services

159

2

9

73

2

7

252

239

6

3

136

2

43

429

Transportation

89

38

1

51

5

11

195

240

28

25

95

22

49

459

Capital expenditure

968

221

234

279

134

262

2,098

1,195

98

286

428

242

351

2,600



For the year ended December 31, 2004
(€ million)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Rest of the world

Total

Water

387

123

61

86

50

154

861

Waste Management

298

8

187

53

89

75

710

Energy Services

145

2

9

87

-

4

247

Transportation

43

25

-

62

12

11

153

Capital expenditure

873

158

257

288

151

244

1,971



Note 48


Impact of IFRS transition


A. Summary of the impact of IFRS transition on the main Income statement and Balance sheet headings



(€ million)

As of December 31, 2004

 
 

French GAAP

IFRS

Difference

Revenue

24,673

22,500

-2,173

Net income from continuing operations

333

497

+164

Net income for the year attributable to equity holders of the parent

125

392

+267

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

3,563

3,223

-340

Total equity

5,619

4,948

-671

Gross financial debt

15,922

18,003

+2,081

Cash and cash equivalents

3,635

4,660

+1,025

Fair value gains/losses on hedge derivatives

-

284

+284

Net financial debt

12,287

13,059

+772

Year ended December 31, 2006

(€ million)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Rest of the world

Total

Water

412

25

129

92

11

184

853

Environmental Services

285

8

66

88

164

81

692

Energy Services

182

13

6

101

4

12

318

Transportation

132

34

36

76

10

14

302

Capital expenditure

1,011

80

237

357

189

291

2,165




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-48F-139



Back to contents


The impact of IFRS transition was published in the update to the 2004 Reference Document (of April 5, 2005), filed with the French financial markets authority (AMF) on May 25, 2005. Veolia Environnement has made a number of adjustments to this published information and mainly the following:


Non-current financial assets were increased from €2,656.3 million to €2,914.1 million, following the recognition of IFRIC 4 loans in respect of installations under construction on a percentage completion basis (see note 1.20) and not on completion. Operating assets were reduced as a result from €10,081.4 million to €9,823.4 million.


Long-term borrowings were increased from €12,055.8 million to €12,157.0 million following further analysis of minority interest put options.


Goodwill was increased from €4,285.9 million to €4,383.6 million following further analysis of minority interest put options and intangible assets.


Intangible assets were decreased from €1,112.5 million to €1,059.0 million following transfers to goodwill.


Minority interests were reduced from €1,782.5 million to €1,725.5 million following further analysis of minority interest put options.


Consequently total equity decreased from €5,022 million in the May 25, 2005 update to the 2004 Reference Document to €4,948 million. The change of €-74 million is related to minority interest put options for €-57 million and recording IFRIC4 loans in progress for €-17 million.


The current/non-current breakdown of provisions was refined.


Taking into account these main adjustments to the May 25, 2005 update to the 2004 Reference Document, the impact of IFRS transition can be summarized as follows.


B. Reconciliation of French GAAP and IFRS equity as of january 1, 2004 and december 31, 2004 and reconciliation of 2004 net income.



(€ million)

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

As of January 1, 2004

Net income for the year

Share capital

Dividends

Foreign exchange translation

Changes in consolid-ation scope

Other

As of December 31, 2004

Equity under French GAAP

3,575

125

44

(218)

33

-

4

3,563

Goodwill

66

182

-

-

-

-

-

248

Actuarial gains (losses)

(124)

1

-

-

-

-

-

(123)

Analysis of contracts

70

15

-

-

-

-

9

94

Treasury shares

(110)

-

(183)

-

-

-

-

(293)

Financial instruments

(90)

(21)

-

-

-

-

(30)

(141)

Discontinued operations

-

104

-

-

(104)

-

-

-

Income tax

(84)

(10)

-

-

1

-

-

(93)

Other

(32)

(4)

10

-

(2)

-

(5)

(33)

Equity under IFRS

3,271

392

(129)

(218)

(72)

-

(22)

3,223

Minority interests under French GAAP

2,680

171

113

(181)

10

(747)

9

2,055

TSAR subordinated loan notes redeemable in preferred shares

(300)

(9)

-

9

-

-

-

(300)

Discontinued operations

(707)

(44)

-

27

-

723

1

-

Minority interest put options

(57)

-

-

-

-

-

-

(57)

Other

23

20

-

1

3

-

(19)

28

Minority interests under IFRS

1,639

138

113

(144)

13

(24)

(9)

1,726


C. IFRS Financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004


C.1. Consolidated Balance Sheet



(€ million)

As of December 31, 2004 under French GAAP with IFRS presentation

 

Ref

IAS/IFRSadjustments

As of December 31, 2004
IAS/IFRS

Goodwill

3,558.5

 

Note D.1

825.1

4,383.6

Other intangible assets

1,859.3

 

Note D.2

(800.3)

1,059.0

Property, plant and equipment and
Publicly-owned utility networks

13,844.0

 

Note D.3

(2,885.9)

10,958.1

Investments in associates

225.2

  

(6.0)

219.2

Non-current financial assets

968.7

 

Note D.4

1,945.4

2,914.1

Deferred tax, net

234.8

 

Note D.5

(46.0)

188.8

Non-current assets

20,690.5

  

(967.7)

19,722.8

Current operating assets

9,223.5

 

Note D.6

599.9

9,823.4

Current financial assets

2,072.8

 

Note D.7

(1,417.5)

655.3

Cash and cash equivalents

3,635.1

 

Note D.8

1,025.2

4,660.3

Current assets

14,931.4

  

207.6

15,139.0

Assets of discontinued operations

-

  

30.3

30.3

Total assets

35,621.9

  

(729.8)

34,892.1

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

3,563.2

 

Note B

(340.4)

3,222.8

Minority interests

2,055.4

 

Note B

(329.9)

1,725.5

Equity

5,618.6

  

(670.3)

4,948.3

Grants

868.8

 

Note D.9

(868.8)

-

Other long-term deferred income

529.0

 

Note D.10

(527.9)

1.1

Non-current provisions

1,689.0

 

Note D.11

(405.5)

1,283.5

Long-term borrowings

10,801.4

 

Note D.12

1,355.6

12,157.0

Other non-current liabilities

273.6

 

Note D.13

78.9

352.5

Non-current liabilities

14,161.8

  

(367.7)

13,794.1

Operating payables

9,736.9

 

Note D.14

(160.9)

9,576.0

Current provisions

984.4

 

Note D.15

(261.4)

723.0

Current financial liabilities

4,610.1

 

Note D.16

816.0

5,426.1

Bank overdrafts

510.1

 

Note D.17

(90.0)

420.1

Current liabilities

15,841.5

  

303.7

16,145.2

Liabilities of discontinued operations

-

  

4.5

4.5

Total equity and liabilities

35,621.9

  

(729.8)

34,892.1




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-49



Back to contentsContents





Year ended December 31, 2005

(€ million)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Rest of the world

Total

Water

386

40

79

87

17

162

771

Environmental Services

271

8

114

61

105

80

639

Energy Services

160

1

9

73

2

7

252

Transportation

87

37

1

51

5

12

193

Capital expenditure

904

86

203

272

129

261

1,855



NOTE 44.

C.2. IFRS Consolidated Income statement for the year ended December 31, 2004Post-balance sheet events



French GAAP

 

 

IFRS

 

     

Revenue

24,673

 

Revenue

22,500

Cost of sales

(20,611)

   

Selling, general and administrative costs

(2,538)

 

Cost of sales

(18,346)

Other operating income (expenses)

92

   

EBIT

1,617

 

Selling costs

(440)

     

Restructuring costs

(51)

 

General and administrative expenses

(2,236)

Goodwill amortization and impairment of intangible assets with an indefinite life

(253)

   
 

Other operating revenue and expenses

3

Operating income

1,313

 

Operating income

1,481

     

Financial income (expenses)

(602)

 

Finance costs, net

(732)

Other financial income (expense)

(33)

   

Income from ordinary activities

678

 

Other financial income (expenses)

46

     

Other income (expense)

(57)

 

Income tax expenses

(184)

Net income before taxes, minority and equity interests

620

   
   

Share of net income of associates

24

Income taxes

(182)

 

Net income from continuing operations

635

Net income before minority and equity interests

438

   
   

Net income from discontinued operations

(106)

Equity in net income of affiliates

22

 

Net income for the year

529

Minority interests

(127)

   

Discontinued operations income

(208)

 

Net income for the year attributable to minority interests

(137)

     

Net income for the year

125

 

Net income for the year attributable to equity holders of the parent

392


C.3. IFRS Cash flow statementOn November 19, 2007, the Environmental Services Division announced the signature of an agreement for the year ended December 31, 2004



(€ million)

French GAAP

 

IFRS

Net income for the year attributable to equity holders of the parent

125.4

 

391.5

Minority interests

171.3

 

216.4

Net charge to depreciation, amortization and provisions

2,224.4

 

2,041.5

Net charge to financial amortization and provisions

83.6

 

(38.2)

Other calculated revenue and expenses

  

(9.1)

Gains (losses) on disposal and dilution

205.6

 

(161.3)

Share of net income of associates

(4.8)

 

(24.2)

Dividends received

  

(6.0)

Finance costs, net

  

732.1

Income tax expense

  

309.5

Deferred tax

(70.0)

  

Deferred charges

(28.7)

  

Other

  

8.3

Operating cash flow before changes in working capital

  

3,460.6

Changes in working capital

328.8

 

294.4

Income taxes paid

  

(238.0)

Net cash from operating activities (see note F)

3,035.6

 

3,517.0

Purchases of property, plant and equipment (see note F)

(2,315.0)

 

(1,964.0)

Proceeds on disposal of property, plant and equipment

315.1

 

316.2

Purchases of investments

(334.0)

 

(334.0)

Proceeds on disposal of investments (see note F)

1,814.6

 

2,184.2

IFRIC 4 investment contracts (see note F)

   

New IFRIC 4 loans

  

(177.0)

Principal payments on IFRIC 4 loans

  

130.0

Dividends received

  

23.5

Interest-bearing long-term loans granted

(132.5)

 

(132.5)

Principal payments on interest-bearing long-term loans

129.4

 

129.4

Net decrease in short-term loans

41.1

 

41.1

Sales and purchases of marketable securities

(278.3)

 

(42.3)

Net cash from investing activities

(759.6)

 

174.6

Net increase in short-term borrowings

1,789.2

 

1,789.2

New long-term borrowings and other debt

1,063.7

 

930.5

Principal payments on long-term borrowings and other debt

(3,468.7)

 

(3,468.7)

Proceeds on issue of shares

167.2

 

167.2

Purchase of treasury shares

(183.2)

 

(183.2)

Dividends paid

(398.5)

 

(389.6)

Interest paid

  

(640.9)

Net cash used in financing activities

(1,030.3)

 

(1,795.5)

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year

1,852.8

 

2,320.6

Effect of foreign exchange rate changes

26.5

 

23.5

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year

3,125.0

 

4,240.2

    

Cash and cash equivalents

3,635.1

 

4,660.3

- Bank overdrafts and other cash position item

510.1

 

420.1

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year

3,125.0

 

4,240.2




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-50



Back to contents



D. Analysisacquisition of balance sheet adjustments


D.1. Goodwill



(€ million)

French GAAP

Purchased goodwill
and market share(1)

Cancellation GW amortization /
negative GW reversal(2)

Minority interest
put option

IFRS

Goodwill

3,559

532

248

45

4,384

(1)

Purchased goodwillthe entire share capital of Bartin Recycling Group, a company specializing in the collection and market shares acquired as a resultrecovery of business combinationsindustrial waste and recognized in intangible assets under French GAAP are transferred to goodwill under IFRS (IAS38).

Purchased goodwillparticular the recycling of ferrous and market shares concernnon-ferrous metals. This acquisition is consistent with the Waste Management Division (€249 million), the Water Division (€164 million), the Transportation Division (€94 million) and the EnergyEnvironmental Services Division (€25 million).

(2)

Cancellationstrategy of amortization“turning waste into a resource” and impairment losses recognized at a level lower than the CGU. Impairment tests performed as of December 31, 2004 under IFRS at CGU level did not identify the needcontinuing to record any additional impairment of goodwill compared with the French GAAP published accounts.

(3) Portion of minority interest puts not recognized in minority interests (see note 1.12)


D.2. Intangible assets



(€ million)

French GAAP

Purchased goodwill and market share(1)

Analysis of contracts(2)

Fee commitments(3)

Intangible assets not recognized(4)

Financial instruments(4)

Other

IFRS

Intangible assets

1,859

(532)

(72)

(47)

(118)

(24)

(7)

1,059

(1)

Purchased goodwill and market shares acquired as a result of business combinations and recognized in intangible assets under French GAAP are transferred to goodwill under IFRS (IAS38).

(2)

Recognition of contracts in accordance with IFRIC 4. Elimination of intangible assetsdevelop its waste management activity in the amount of €72 million in respect of certain Water Division contracts (mainly in Asia) classified as leases under IFRIC4.

(3)

See note D.12.

(4)

Mainly cancelled deferred charges.


D.3. Property, plant and equipment and publicly-owned utility networks



(€ million)

French GAAP

Concessions (IAS 2)

Analysis of contracts(2)

Components
(3)

Finance leases(4)

Grants(5)

Other

IFRS

Property, plant and equipment and publicly-owned utility networks

13,844

(589)

(1,765)

(45)

84

(522)

(49)

10,958

(1)

Transfer to Property, plant and equipment of depreciation charge of fixed assets under concession recorded in provisions for contingencies and losses under French GAAP. See Note 1.20 “Concession and affermage contracts”.

(2)

See note 1.20 IFRIC 4 investment contracts.

(3)

See note 1.20 Other contracts and note 1.16.

(4)

Application of IAS 17.

(5)

See note 1.7.


D.4. Non-current financial assets



(€ million)

French GAAP

IFRS

Long-term loans

417.2

2,108.1

Other financial assets

368.6

618.2

Non-consolidated investments

176.2

181.1

Long-term portfolio investments (TIAP)

6.7

6.7

Non-current financial assets

968.7

2,914.1

The €1,690.9 million increase in loans is attributable in the amount of €1,694 million to the reclassification of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment pursuant to the application of IFRIC 4. See note 1.20.

The increase in other financial assets (€250 million) is attributable in the amount of €425 million to the recognition of derivative financial instruments at fair value in accordance with IAS 32 and 39. Under French GAAP, the foreign exchange component of foreign exchange derivatives is remeasured to fair value. In the case of interest rate derivatives, only accrued interest, premiums and swap cash balances are recorded in the balance sheet.

In addition, UK financial investments with a value of €117 million under French GAAP are offset against equity under IFRS, following the cancellation of actuarial gains and losses as of January 1, 2004.


D.5. Deferred tax, net


The €46 million decrease in net deferred tax assets is due to the tax impact of IFRS adjustments and unwinding of discount.


D.6. Current operating assets


The €600 million increase in operating receivables is mainly due to the add-back of “Dailly law” discounted receivables (+€825 million), the analysis of contracts (-€84 million) which resulted in the reclassification of certain operating receivables and the reclassification of receivables in respect of invoices not yet issued in the Water Division (–€110 million).


D.7. Current financial assets


Current financial assets under IFRS include €466 million of short-term loans (including €133 million as result of the analysis of contracts and IFRIC 4, see note 1.20) and €190 million of marketable securities, compared to €395 million and €1,678 million respectively under French GAAP.

The increase in short-term loans (€71 million) is attributable in the amount of €133 million to the reclassification of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets in accordance with IFRIC 4.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-51



Back to contents


The €1,488 million reduction in marketable securities is due to the reclassification of shares in monetary and treasury UCITS in cash and cash equivalents (€1,212 million) and the deduction of treasury shares from equity (€276 million).


D.8. Cash and cash equivalents


Cash and cash equivalents under IFRS is €4,660 million, compared to €3,635 million under French GAAP. This increase is a result of the reclassification in cash and cash equivalents of shares in monetary and treasury UCITS (€1,212 million), and the reclassification of accrued interest on derivatives recognized at fair value in other financial assets (-€179 million).


D.9. Grants


The reversal of grants under IFRS concerns grants adjusted pursuant to the recognition of certain contracts in loans in accordance with IFRIC 4 in the amount of -€347 million, with the residual balance deducted from property, plant and equipment.


D.10 Other long-term deferred income


Other long-term deferred income includes under French GAAP, payments made in respect of income from the securitization of future receivables in the Energy Services Division.recycling segment. This transaction (known as Cogevolt) was organized as partrepresents an investment of €147 million for the financing of the cogeneration installations of the Energy Services businesses. The income has been amortized on an actuarial basis since January 1, 1998 over the term of the receivables, which ranges from 5 to 12 years. Under IFRS, this transaction is equated to additional financing and reclassified in borrowings (see notes  D.12 and D.17).


D.11. Non-current provisions



(€ millions)

French GAAP

Reclassification in PP&E(1)

Discounting(2)

Provisions not recognized

Actuarial gains (losses)

Other

IFRS

Provisions for contingencies and losses

1,400

(591)

29

(13)

-

45

870

Provisions for pensions and other employee benefits

289

-

-

-

68

56

413

(1)

Reclassifications of non-current provisions concern the depreciation charge fixed assets under concession deducted from property, plant and equipment. See note 1.20, Concession and affermage contracts.

(2)

See note 1.13.


D. 12. Long-term borrowings


(€ million)

French GAAP

10,801.4

TSAR

(a)

298.0

Amortized cost restatement

(b)

(76.0)

Revaluation of the debt

(c)

260.3

Consolidation of special purpose entities (SIC 12)

17.3

Lease finance (IAS 17)

44.9

Local authority loans

(d)

112.7

Cogevolt

(e)

561.5

Minority interest put options

(f)

113.9

Other

23.0

IFRS impacts

1,355.6

Long-term borrowings under IFRS

12,157.0

(a)

VEFO (Veolia Environnement Financière de l'Ouest, holding company owned over 99% by Veolia Environnement) issued subordinated securities redeemable in preference shares (TSAR) in December 2001 in the amount of €300 million, maturing December 28, 2006. Given the characteristics of these securities, they were treated as minority interests under French GAAP. Under IFRS, these securities are recorded as debt instruments in accordance with IAS 32 and 39.

(b)

See Note 1.14 Recognition of borrowings

(c)

Impact of the revaluation of debt hedged by fair value derivative instruments. In addition, the derivative instruments are remeasured in either Non-current financial assets or Other non-current liabilities.

(d)

Fee commitments under public service contracts were considered commitments and contingencies under French GAAP. They are treated as borrowings under IFRS.

(e)

See note D.10.

(f) See note 1.14, paragraph “Minority interest put options”


D.13. Other non-current liabilities


The €79 million increase in Other non-current liabilities is mainly due to the revaluation of derivative instruments.


D.14. Operating payables


The €160 million decrease in operating payables is due to the reclassification of liabilities in respect of invoices not issued by the Water Division (€132 million) and the analysis of contracts which led to the reclassification of certain operating payables (€42 million).


D.15. Current provisions



(€ million)

French GAAP

Reclassification in PP&E

Provisions not recognized under IFRS

Other

IFRS

Provisions for contingencies and losses

957

(135)

(83)

(44)

695

Provisions for pensions and other employee benefits

28

-

-

-

28





VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-52



Back to contents


D.16. Short-term borrowings


(€ million)

Under French GAAP

4,610.1

Finance leases (IAS 17)

46.7

Discounted receivables and equivalent

(a)

129.3

“Dailly law” discounted receivables

(a)

695.4

Cogevolt

(b)

66.7

Financial instruments

(c)

(71.3)

Other

(50.8)

IFRS impacts

816.0

Short-term borrowings under IFRS

5,426.1


(a)

Under  IAS 39, “Dailly law” discounted receivables and equivalent are treated as bank financing guaranteed by receivables.

(b)

See note D.10.

(c)

Reclassification of deferred income and accrued interest, as a result of the recognition of derivative instruments at fair value including accrued interest.


D.17. Bank overdrafts


The decrease in bank overdrafts (€90 million) is attributable in the amount of €112 million to Cogevolt deferred income transferred to short- and long-term borrowings.


E.

Analysis of adjustments to the Income statement


E.1. Revenue


(€ million)

 

Water

Waste Management

Energy Services

Transportation

Total

Revenues under French GAAP

9,804.8

6,220.0

5,035.5

3,613.0

24,673.3

Discontinued operations

-

-

-

(5.2)

(5.2)

Loan amortization in accordance with IFRIC 4(1)

(17.4)

(19.0)

(110.3)

(10.1)

(156.8)

IFRIC 4 loans recognized on a completion basis(2)

147.3

-

-

-

147.3

Reclassification of income received on behalf of third parties in Cost of sales(1)

(2,129.3)

-

(0.1)

-

(2,129.4)

Other

(28.0)

13.4

(5.3)

(9.0)

(28.9)

Revenue under IFRS

7,777.4

6,214.4

4,919.8

3,588.7

22,500.3

(1)

See note 1.17

(2)

See note 1.20 “Assets relating to IFRIC 4 contracts”


E.2. Reconciliation of EBIT and Operating income



(€ million)

Total

Water

Waste Manage-ment

Energy Services

Transport-ation

Holding companies

EBIT under French GAAP

1,616.9

830.6

456.6

295.8

103.3

(69.4)

Other non-recurring items

(57.3)

(53.4)

8.0

(10.5)

(1.5)

-

Restructuring costs, net

(51.1)

(28.5)

(2.7)

(17.2)

(2.7)

-

Amortization and impairment of goodwill and intangible assets with an indefinite useful life

(253.3)

(54.4)

(67.5)

(44.9)

(86.6)

0.1

Operating income IFRS presentation

1,255.2

694.3

394.5

223.2

12.5

(69.3)

Cancellation of amortization and impairment of goodwill and intangible assets
with an indefinite useful life (IAS36)

181.6

54.7

65.5

43.1

18.3

-

Impact of IFRIC 4

0.4

7.9

0.4

(7.5)

(0.4)

-

Components approach (IAS 16)

5.1

14.2

(5.9)

(2.5)

(0.7)

-

Other elements resulting from the analysis of contracts

10.5

10.5

-

-

-

-

Intangible assets (IAS 38)

13.9

-

10.6

2.0

1.3

-

Provisions (IAS 37)

14.7

8.0

4.6

1.3

0.8

-

Other

(0.8)

9.9

(2.1)

(6.3)

(0.5)

(1.8)

Total  IFRS adjustments

225.4

105.2

73.1

30.1

18.8

(1.8)

Operating income under IFRS

1,480.6

799.5

467.6

253.3

31.3

(71.1)


Operating income includes a capital loss of €55 million on the sale of Berlikomm securities in the Water Division, an expense of €14 million in respect of the resolution of a dispute in the EnergyEnvironmental Services Division and was finalized on February 13, 2008.

In February 2008, following a €70 million impairmenttakeover bid launched on December 17, 2007, Dalkia became the majority shareholder with a stake of goodwill97.9% in the Transportation DivisionPraterm, a heat production and distribution company in respect of Northern Europe.


The adjustmentsPoland. This transaction enabled Dalkia to arrive at Revenue and Operating income under IFRS, involve the following adjustments at Cost of sales level:

a €2.1 billion reductionstrengthen its position in respect of income received on behalf of third parties;

a reduction in depreciation in respect of property, plant and equipment transferred to other loans in accordance with IFRIC 4, revenue having decreased €157 million;

the inclusion in Cost of sales of goodwill impairment;

an increase of €147.3 million in respectthis country, where it already owns two of the recognitionlargest heating networks in Poznan and Lodz. This transaction represents an investment of IFRIC 4 loans on a completion basis.




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-53



Back to contents


E.3. Reconciliation of finance costs and other financial income (expenses)


(€ million)

Total

Finance costs under French GAAP

(602.1)

+ Finance costs in inventories and capitalized

12.2

- Loan income and income from marketable securities(1)

(72.9)

Finance costs IFRS presentation

(662.8)

+ Calculation of the debt at amortized cost(2)

(45.0)

+ Fair value adjustment of derivative instruments(3)

(16.5)

+ Interest on TSAR(4)

(8.9)

+ Borrowing annuities(5)

(8.8)

+ Other

9.9

Finance costs under  IFRS

(732.1)

Reconciliation of Other financial income (expenses)

Other financial income (expenses) under French GAAP

(32.9)

+ Loan income and income from marketable securities(1)

60.7

Other financial income (expenses) IFRS presentation

27.8

+ Unwinding of discount of provisions

(10.8)  

+ Calculation of the debt at amortized cost(2)

44.6

+ Other

(15.5)

Other financial income (expenses) under IFRS

46.1

(1)

Net finance costs under IFRS consist of gross finance costs less cash and cash equivalents. As such, loan income and income from marketable securities is transferred to “Other financial income and expenses”.

(2)

See Note 1.14 on the recognition of financial liabilities. Under French GAAP, the amortization of redemption premiums and loan issue costs is treated as other financial expenses. Under IFRS, these expenses are treated as components of the amortized cost.

(3)

See Note 1.14 on derivative instruments. These adjustments concern the revaluation of interest rate derivatives.

(4)

See Note D.12 on long-term borrowings.


E.4. Tax reconciliation


2004

French GAAP

IFRS

Difference

Income tax

(225.9)

(225.1)

+0.8

Deferred tax

+43.5

+41.0

(2.5)


Mainly tax on IFRS adjustments.


E.5. Income from discontinued operations



(€ million)

2004

Sub-total US disposals

(162.2)

Sub-total FCC disposal

58.4

Sub-total disposal Connex UK activities

(1.9)

Income from discontinued operations under IFRS

(105.7)



Discontinued operations income under French GAAP

(207.8)

Foreign exchange losses on US disposals

(49.8)

Tax on foreign exchange losses on US disposals

140.4

Foreign exchange gains on FCC disposal

17.5

Other

(6.0)

Income from discontinued operations under IFRS

(105.7)


Due to the incorporation of translation reserves in consolidated reserves as of January 1, 2004 (see note 1.2), foreign exchange gains and losses and the related tax on US and FCC disposals are not recognized under IFRS.


E.6 Reconciliation of Net income€109 million for the year attributable to equity holders of the parent under French GAAP and IFRSDalkia.



(€ million)

2004

2004 Net income for the year under French GAAP

125.4

Goodwill amortization

181.4

Other impacts on operating income

44.0

Foreign exchange losses on US and FCC disposals

(32.3)

Tax on foreign exchange losses

140.8

Impacts on financial items

(51.1)

Other

(16.7)

2004 Net income for the year under IFRS

391.5


F.

Analysis of differences concerning the IFRS cash flow statement


The consolidated cash flow statement was prepared in accordance with the model presented in the French National Accounting Institute (CNC) recommendation n° 2004-12-02 of October 27, 2004, adapted to reflect the specific nature of the Group’s businesses.


Net cash from operating activities: +€482 million, including

Exclusion of interest paid transferred to net cash used in financing activities: +€641 million

Reclassification of principal payments on IFRIC 4 loans, which represent a component of revenues under French GAAP and a repayment flow under IFRS: -€ 130 million

The difference in working capital changes between French GAAP and IFRS is due to the reclassification of changes in tax receivables and payables in income taxes paid.




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-54



Back to contents


Net cash from investing activities: +€934 million

Purchases of property, plant and equipment: +€ 351 million

-

exclusion of purchases of property, plant and equipment financed by finance lease: +€133 million (only financial lease payments are treated as cash items);

-

reclassification of purchases of property, plant and equipment in IFRIC 4 contracts: +€177 million

Proceeds on disposal of investments: +€369 million

-

As the US assets and FCC sold during the year were recorded in assets of discontinued operations, the opening cash balance did not include any cash in respect of these assets. The sales in 2004 did not therefore involve the transfer of any cash balances.

New IFRIC 4 loans : -€47 million

-

Investments in progress and new loans: -€177 million;

-

Principal payments on loans: +€130 million

Sales and purchases of marketable securities: +€286 million; investments in monetary and treasury UCITS are considered cash equivalents.


Net cash used in financing activities: -€765 million

Decrease in new borrowings in respect of new finance leases: -€133 million;

Inclusion of interest paid: -€ 641 million


Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents in the Group cash flow statement as of December 31, 2005 breaks down as follows:

- Cash at bank and in hand

€948 million

- Monetary instruments

€3,229 million

- Other short-term treasury instruments

€483 million

----------------

€4,660 million


Note 49NOTE 45.


Main companies included in the 20052007 consolidated financial statements


In 2005,2007, the Group consolidated or accounted for a total of 2,0962,535 companies, of which the principal companies are:


Company and address

French company registration number
(“N° Siret”)
(N° Siret)

ConsolidationmethodConsolidation method

%  holdinginterest

Veolia Environnement SA

36-38, avenue Kléber – 75116 Paris

403 210 032 0004740 321 003 200 047

FC

100.00

SenseSociété d’Environnement et de Services de l’Est SAS

2, rue Annette Bloch – 25200 Montbéliard

444 590 921 0005244 459 092 100 052

FC

80.47

WATER

   

Veolia Water
Eau - Compagnie Générale des Eaux

52, rue d’Anjou – 75008 Paris

421 345 042 0001257 202 552 600 029

FC

100.00

Veolia Eau - Compagnie Générale des Eaux and its subsidiaries
Water

52, rue d’Anjou – 75008 Paris

572 025 526 0002942 134 504 200 012

FC

100.00




F-140



Back to Contents



Company and address

French company registration number (N° Siret)

Consolidation method

%  interest

Including the following French companies in France:

   

Compagnie des Eaux et de l’Ozone52,l’Ozone

52, rue d’Anjou – 75008 Paris

775 667 363 0159777 566 736 301 597

FC

99.99100.00

Compagnie des Eaux de Paris7,Paris

7, rue Tronson-du-Coudray – 75008 Paris

329 207 740 0004732 920 774 000 047

FC

99.99100.00

Société Française de Distribution d’Eau7,d’Eau

7, rue Tronson-du-Coudray – 75008 Paris

542 054 945 0006954 205 494 500 069

FC

99.6099.86

Compagnie Fermière de Services Publics3,Publics

3, rue Marcel Sembat – Immeuble CAP 44 – 44100 Nantes

57 575 750 161 00342016 100 342

FC

99.11

Compagnie Méditerranéenne d’exploitation des Services d’Eau12,d’Eau

12, boulevard René Cassin – 06100 Nice

780 153 292 0011278 015 329 200 112

FC

99.7099.72

Société des Eaux de Melun

Zone Industrielle – 198/398, rue Foch – 77000 Vaux Le Pénil

785 751 058 0004778 575 105 800 047 

FC

99.2299.28

Société des Eaux de Marseille and its subsidiaries

25, rue Edouard Delanglade – BP 29 – 13254 Marseille

057 806 150 000175 780 615 000 017

PC

48.8348.85

Société des Eaux du Nord

217, boulevard de la Liberté – 59800 Lille

572 026 417 0024457 202 641 700 244

PC

49.5449.55

Société des Eaux de Versailles et de Saint-Cloud

145, rue Yves le Coz – 78000 Versailles

318 634 649 0005331 863 464 900 053

PC

50.00

Sade-Compagnie Générale de Travaux d’Hydraulique
and its subsidiaries

28, rue de la Baume – 75008 Paris

562 077 503 0001856 207 750 300 018

FC

98.6499.03

Veolia Water Systems (ex-OTV)
Solutions & Technologies and its subsidiaries

l’Aquarène – 1, place Montgolfier – 94417 St Maurice Cedex

542 078 688 0106541 498 621 600 037

FC

100.00

OTV France

l’Aquarène – 1 place Montgolfier – 94410 SAINT MAURICE

433 998 473 000 14

FC

100.00

Société Internationale de Dessalement

54 rue de Clichy – 75009 PARIS

342 500 956 000 12

FC

100.00




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-55F-141



Back to contentsContents



Company and address

French company registration number
(“N° Siret”)
(N° Siret)

Consolidation method

%  holdinginterest

Including the following foreign companies:companies :

   

Veolia Water UK Plc and its subsidiaries

37-41 Old Queen Street
London SW1H 9JA (U.K.)(United Kingdom)

FC

100.00

Three Valleys Water Plc

Bishops Rise Hatfield – Hertfordshire AL10 9HL (United Kingdom)

 

FC

100.00

Veolia Water North America and its subsidiaries

14950 Heathrow Forest Parkway – Suite 200

Houston TX77032 Texas (U.S.A.)(United States)

FC

100.00

Veolia Wasser GmbH and its subsidiaries

Lindencorso Unter den linden 21 – D 10 117  Berlin (Germany)

 

FC

100.00

Berliner Wasser Betriebe
Wasserbetriebe Anstalt des Offentichen Rechts

Neue Jüdenstrasse 1 – D10179 Berlin Mitte (Germany)

 

PC

24.95

Servitec KFT (Veolia Water Hungary)
Lovas UT 131b – 1012 Budapest (Hungry)Braunschweig  Versorgungs AG  GMBH

FC

100.00

OEWA Wasser und Abwasser
Walter Köhn Strasse 1 – 04358 LeipzigTaubenstrasse 7 D-38 108 Braunschweig (Germany)

 

FC

100.0074.90

Southern Water Investments Limited
Southern House Yeomen Road Worthing
West Sussex BN13 3 NX (U.K.)Aquiris SA

EA

25.00

Prague Water CGE AW (Veolia Water Prague)
52, rue d'Anjou – 75008 ParisAvenue de Vilvorde 450 - 1130 Brussels (Belgium)

 

FC

99.9198.50

VS Braunschweig Beteil GMBHApa Nova Bucuresti Srl

Strada Aristide Demetriade nr 2, Sector 1, Bucharest (Romania)

 

FC

100.0073.69

Veolia Voda and its subsidiaries

52, rue d’Anjou – 75 008 Paris

434 934 809 00016

FC

90.00

Prazske Vodovody A Kanalizagce As

11 Parizska -11 000 Prague 1 (Czech Republic)

FC

90.00

Severoceske Vodovody A Kanalizagce As

1 689 Pritkovska – 41 550 Teplice (Czech Republic)

FC

45.09

Shenzhen Water Shenzhen
Group Company Ltd and its subsidiaries

Water Tower, n°1019 Shennan Zhong Road – Shenzhen 518031 (China)

 

PC

25.0

ENERGY SERVICES

Dalkia – Saint-André
37, avenue du Mal de Lattre de Tassigny
59350 St André les Lille

403 211 295 00023

FC

66.0025.00

Dalkia France
37, avenue du Mal de Lattre de Tassigny
59350 St André les LilleShanghai Pudong Veolia Water Corporation Ltd

456 500 537 00018

FC

65.94

Cogestar – Saint André
37, avenue du Mal de Lattre de Tassigny
59350 St André les Lille

404 324 097 00025

FC

65.94

Cogestar 2 – Saint André
33, place Ronde Quartier Valmy – 92800 Puteaux

431 951 540 00019

FC

65.94

Crystal S.A. – Saint André
37, avenue du Mal de Lattre de Tassigny
59350 St André les Lille

322 498 270 00014

FC

65.94

Citelum
37 rue de Lyon 75012 Paris

389 643 859 00019

FC

65.94

Dalkia Morava AS
28 Rijna 152 – 70974 Ostrava (Czech Republic)703 Pujian Road, Pudong New District, 200127 Shanghai (China)

 

PC

49.0550.00

Dalkia PLCand its subsidiaries
Elizabeth House – 56-60 LondonChangzhou CGE Water Co Ltd

12 Juqian Road – Staines TW18 4BQ(U.K.)Changzhou  (China)

 

PC

50.02

Clemessy and its subsidiaries
18, rue de Thann – 68200 Mulhouse

945 752 137 00212

FC

65.68

Siram, SPA and its subsidiaries
Via Bisceglie, 95 – 20152 Milano (Italy)

PC

50.0224.99




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-56F-142



Back to contentsContents



Company and address

French company registration number
(“N° Siret”)
(N° Siret)

Consolidation method

%  holdinginterest

ZTO (Dalkia Ostrava)Pivovarska, 84/1 PSC – Ostrava (Czech Republic)Kunming CGE Water Supply Co Ltd

No626 Beijing Road - Kunming (China)

 

PC

46.6024.99

Dalkia Poznan ZepVeolia Water Korea  Co Ltd and its subsidiaries
UL Gdynska 54

San 5-1, Kagwa-Ri, Bubal-Eup, Inchon-Shi,

GYONGGI-DO 467-701 (South Korea)

FC

100.00

Veolia Water Australia and its subsidiaries

65 Pirrama Road, Pyrmont NSW 2009 (Australia)

FC

100.00

Société d’Energie et d’Eau du Gabon

Avenue Felix Eboué BP 218760-960 Poznan (Poland)Libreville (Gabon)

FC

41.08

Veolia Water AMI and its subsidiaries

52 rue d’Anjou – 75 008 Paris

403 105 919 00019

FC

80.55

Amendis

23 rue Carnot – 90 000 Tangiers (Morocco)

FC

65.25

REDAL  SA

6 Zankat Al Hoceima, BP 161 – 10 000 Rabat (Morocco)

FC

65.59

Lanzhou Veolia Water Co LTD

No 22 Hua Gong Street, Xigu District, Lanzhou, Gansu Province, China

 

PC

25.7222.95

Sharqiyah Desalination Co. SAOC

PO Box 685, PC 114 Jibroo, Sultanate of Oman

1 011 277

FC

54.81

WASTE MANAGEMENTENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

   

Veolia Propreté

Parc des Fontaines – 163 / 169, avenue Georges Clémenceau

92000 Nanterre

572 221 034 0077857 222 103 400 778

FC

100.00

Société d’Assainissement Rationnel et de Pompage  (S.A.R.P.) and its subsidiaries (S.A.R.P.)
162/16 Energy Park IV –

162/166 boulevard de Verdun
- Energy Park IV

92413 Courbevoie Cedex

775 734 817 0035377 573 481 700 353

FC

99.5399.55

SARP Industries and its subsidiaries

427, route du Hazay – Zone Portuaire Limay-Porcheville-78520Limay-Porcheville

78520 Limay

303 772 982 0002930 377 298 200 029

FC

99.8299.84

Onyx Environmental Group Plc
OnyxVeolia Propreté Nettoyage et Multiservices  and its subsidiaries

132, boulevard de Verdun - Energy Park IV

92400 Courbevoie Cedex

334 516 895 000 11

FC

100.00




F-143



Back to Contents



Company and address

French company registration number (N° Siret)

Consolidation method

%  interest

ROUTIERE DE L'EST PARISIEN

ZI Rue Robert Moinon

95190 GOUSSAINVILLE

61 200 696 500 026

FC

100.00

ONYX AUVERGNE RHONE ALPES

235, Cours Lafayette

69006 LYON

30 259 089 800 169

FC

100.00

VALNOR

5, rue de Courtalin - Val d'Europe

77450 MAGNY LE HONGRE

41 030 116 200 302

FC

100.00

OTUS

26, avenue des Champs Pierreux

92000 NANTERRE

62 205 759 400 336

FC

100.00

Including the following foreign companies :

Veolia ES Holding PLC and its subsidiaries

Veolia house – 401 Mile end154A Pentonville Road
E34 PB

N1 9PE – London (U.K.)(United Kingdom)

 

FC

100.00

OnyxVeolia Environmental Services North America Corp.
3225 Aviation Avenue – 4th Floor – 33133 Miami (U.S.A.)

700 E. Butterfield road - Suite 201

IL 60148 LOMBARD  (USA)

 

FC

100.00

OnyxVeolia ES Solid Waste, Service
Inc

One Honey Creed Corporate Center – 125 South

84th Street – Suite 200

WI 53214 Milwaukee (U.S.A.)(USA)

 

FC

100.00

Collex Waste ManagementMONTENAY INTERNATIONAL

One Pennsylvania Plaza - Suite 4400

NY 10119 NEW YORK (USA)

FC

100.00

VES TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS LLC

Butterfield Center – 700 East Butterfield Road, #201

60148 LOMBARD (USA)

FC

100.00

Veolia ES Industrial Services, Inc

1980 North Highway 146

La Porte 77571 Texas (USA)

FC

100.00




F-144



Back to Contents



Company and address

French company registration number (N° Siret)

Consolidation method

%  interest

VEOLIA ES CANADA SERVICES INDUSTRIELS INC

1705, 3eme avenue

Canadian Corporate Office - 80 Birmingham Street

L8L 6W5 HAMILTON (CANADA)

FC

100.00

Veolia Environmental Services Australia Pty Ltd
280 Georges Street

Level 4, Bay CenterLevel 1265 Pirrama Road – P.O. Box H126 Australia Square
–NSW 2009 – Pyrmont (Australia)

FC

100.00

Veolia Environmental Services Asia Pte Ltd

50, Robinson Road – 16-00 Building , Centennial Tower – Singapore

FC

100.00

Veolia Environnmental Services China LTD

7/F Allied Kajima Building

138 Gloucester Road – Central - NSW 1215 – Sydney (Australia)HONG-KONG

 

FC

100.00

Marius Pedersen / Veolia Miljøservice Holding A/S Denmark
Ærbaekvej 495863 Ferritslev (Denmark)Danemark and its subsidiaries

 

FC

65.00

VEOLIA MILJØ AS

Box 567 Skoyen

0214 OSLO (NORGE)

FC

100.00


Veolia Environmental Services Belgium NV and its subsidiaries

642 Mechelsesteenweg,

1800 Vilvorde (Belgium)

FC

100.00

Veolia Umweltservice GmbH (ex Sulo)

Am Sandtorkai 75

D-20457 Hamburg

FC

100.00

Veolia Servizi Ambientali SpA and its subsidiaries

Riazza Della Repubblica 7 Milan – 20121 -(Italia)

FC

100.00




F-145



Back to Contents



Company and address

French company registration number (N° Siret)

Consolidation method

%  interest

ENERGY

   

Dalkia – Saint-André

37, avenue du Mal de Lattre de Tassigny

59350 St André lès Lille

40 321 129 500 023

FC

66.00

Dalkia France

37, avenue du Mal de Lattre de Tassigny

59350 St André lès Lille

45 650 053 700 018

FC

65.96

Dalkia Investissement

37, avenue du Mal de Lattre de Tassigny

59350 St André lès Lille

40 443 498 700 073

PC

33.00

Dalkia International

37, avenue du Mal de Lattre de Tassigny

59350 St André lès Lille

43 353 956 600 011

PC

50.03

Crystal S.A.

28, rue Kleber

92320 Chatillon

32 249 827 000 014

FC

65.95

Citélum and its subsidiaries

37, rue de Lyon – 75012 Paris

38 964 385 900 019 

FC 

65.96 

Proxiserve Holding (and its subsidiaries)

7 Rue Troncon du Coudray – 75008 Paris

403 210 875 00015

FC

82,98

Clemessy and its subsidiaries

18, rue de Thann – 68200 Mulhouse

94 575 213 700 212

FC

65.68

Including the following foreign companies :

Dalkia PLC and its subsidiaries

Elizabeth House – 56-60 London Road – Staines TW18 4BQ

(UK)

PC

50.03

Dalkia NV and its subsidiaries

52, Quai Fernand Demets – 1070 – Anderlecht (Belgium)

PC

50.03

Siram SPA and its subsidiaries

Via Bisceglie, 95 – 20152 Milan (Italia)

PC

50.03

Dalkia Energia Y Servicios and its subsidiaries

Cl Juan Ignacio Luca De tgna, 4 – 28 027 Madrid (Spain)

PC

50.03

Dalkia GmbH and its subsidiaries

Carl-Ulrich-Strabe 4 – 63263 Neu Isenburg (Germany)

PC

50.03




F-146



Back to Contents



Company and address

French company registration number (N° Siret)

Consolidation method

%  interest

Dalkia SGPS SA and its subsidiaries

Estrada de Paço d’Arcos 2780 – 666 Paco d’Arços (Portugal)

PC

50.03

Dalkia Limitada and its subsidiaries

Rua Fidencio Ramos, 223 – 13 andar,  Vila Olimpia

4551-60  Sao Paulo SP (Brazil)

PC

50.03

Dalkia Polska and its subsidiaries

Ul Kruczkowskiego 8 – 00 380 Warsaw (Poland)

PC

32.52

Zespol Elektrocieplownl w Lodzi and its subsidiary

Ul.Jadzi. Andrzejewskiej Street 90-975 Lodz (Poland)

PC

18.37

Dalkia AB and its subsidiaries

Hälsingegatan 47 –  113 31 Stockholm (Sweden)

PC

50.03

Tallinna Kute

Punane 36 13619  Tallinn (Estonia)

PC

50.03

UAB Vilnius Energija

Joconiu St. 13 - 02300 VILNIUS (Lithuania)

PC

50.03

Dalkia Energia Zrt. and its subsidiaries

Budafoki út 91-93  – H-1117 Budapest (Hungary)

PC

49.88

Dalkia a.s and its subsidiaries

Kutlíkova 17 – Technopol –  851 02 Bratislava 5 (Slovakia)

PC

50.03

Dalkia Ceska Republika and its subsidiaries

28.řijna 3123/ 152 – 709 74 Ostrava  (Czech Republic)

PC

49.06

TRANSPORTATION

   

CONNEX
VEOLIA TRANSPORT

Parc des Fontaines – 163 / 169, avenue Georges Clémenceau

92000 Nanterre

383 607 090 00016

FC

100.00

CONNEX TRANSPORT AB
Englundavagen 9Société Nationale Maritime Corse-Méditerranée (SNCM)

61 boulevard des DamesBox 1820 – 17124 Solna (Sweden)13002 Marseilles

775 558 463 00011

FC

100.00

CONNEX TRANSPORT UK LTD
Waterloo Business Center – 117 Waterloo Road
London SE1 8UL, UK

FC

100.0028.29

CONNEX VERKEHR GmbH
Rödelheimer Bahnweg 31,
60489 Francfort, Germany

FC

100.00

CONNEX GROUP AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
Level 3, Flinders St Station, 223 Flinders St
Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia

FC

100.00

CONNEX NORTH AMERICA (CNA)
2100 Huntingdon Avenue MD 21211 Baltimore (U.S.A.)

FC

100.00

C.F.T.I. (Compagnie Française de Transport Interurbain)

Parc des Fontaines - 163 / 169, avenue Georges Clémenceau – 92000 Nanterre

552 022 063 01075

FC

99,7799.88

C.G.F.T.E. (Compagnie Générale Française de Transports
et d’Entreprises)VEOLIA TRANSPORT URBAIN

Parc des Fontaines – 163 / 169, avenue Georges Clémenceau

92000 Nanterre

344 379 060 00082

FC

100.00




F-147



Back to Contents



Connex GVI Inc720 rue TrotterCompany and address

French company registration number (N° Siret)

Consolidation method

%  interest

Veolia Eurolines and its subsidiaries

163/169, avenue Georges Clémenceau - 92000 Nanterre

434 009 254 00021

FC

99.97

Veolia Cargo

169, avenue Georges ClemenceauSt-Jean-sur-Richelieu, QC, J3B 8T2 (Canada)92000 Nanterre

444 413 942 00012 

FC

100.00

Including the following foreign companies:

VEOLIA TRANSPORTATION Inc. and its subsidiaries

8757 Georgia Avenue – Suite 1300 – Silver Spring MD 20910

Baltimore (USA)

FC

100.00

Super Shuttle International Inc, and its subsidiaries

14500 N. Northsight Boulevard, Suite 329

Scottsdale, AZ 85260 (USA)

FC

81.00

VEOLIA TRANSPORT AUSTRALASIA P/L and its subsidiaries

Level 24, 1 Spring Street

Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia

FC

100.00

Connex Melbourne Pty Ltd

1 Spring Street

Melbourne, Victoria 3001, Australia

FC

100.00

Veolia Transport Northern Europe AB and its subsidiaries

Englundavägen 9, Box 1820

SE-171 24 Solna (Sweden)

FC

100.00

VEOLIA TRANSPORT NORD AS

Havnegata 3, Postboks 308

9615 Hammerfest (Norway)

FC

100.00

Veolia Transport Sverige AB and its subsidiaries

Englundavägen 9, Box 1820

SE-171 24 Solna (Sweden)

FC

100.00

People Travel Group AB

72 Klarabergsviadukten

11 164 Stockholm (Sweden)

FC

100.00

Veolia Transport Norge AS

Klubbgaten 1 – N 4013 – Stavanger (Norway)

FC

100.00

VEOLIA TRANSPORT UK LTD and its subsidiaries

37-41 Old Queen Street

London SW 1H 9JA, (United Kingdom)

FC

100.00



F-148



Back to Contents



Company and address

French company registration number (N° Siret)

Consolidation method

%  interest

Veolia Transport Nederland Holdings BV and its subsidiaries

Mastbosstraat 12 - Postbus 3306

4813 GT Breda

FC

100.00

Veolia Transport Belgium nv and its subsidiaries

Groenendaallaan 387

2030 Antwerp

FC

100.00

Veolia Transport Central Europe GmbH and its subsidiaries

Georgenstrasse 22

10117 Berlin

FC

65.00

Veolia Verkehr GmbH and its subsidiaries

Georgenstrasse 22

10117 Berlin

FC

100.00

Veolia Transport Ceska Republica a.s.

K Hutim 664/7

198 00 Praha 9 (Czech Republic)

FC

65.00

    

PROACTIVA
216 Paso de la Castellana Medio Ambiete SA

Calle Cardenal Marcelo Spinola 8280463a – 28016 Madrid (Spain)

PC

50.00

Veolia Energy North America Holding

1250 Hancock Street, Suite 204N Quincy Massachusetts 02169

FC

100.00

Thermal North America Inc

99 Summer Street, Suite 900 Boston Massachusetts 02110

FC

100.00


Consolidation method

FC: Full consolidation – PC: Proportionate consolidation – EA: Equity associate


FC: Full consolidation – PC: Proportionate consolidation – EA: Equity associate




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-57F-149



Back to contents



Note 50


Supplemental disclosures


The following information has been prepared to present supplemental disclosures required under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (U.S. GAAP) and US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulations applicable to the Group.

Pursuant to European regulation 1606/2002 dated July 19, 2002 relative to the adoption of international accounting standards, the consolidated financial statements of the Group at year end December 31, 2005  have been prepared in accordance with IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards), which differ in certain respects from U.S. GAAP. As disclosed in note 1, all standards and interpretation applied by the group have been adopted by the EU. There are no differences between IFRS adopted by European Union as of December 31, 2005, as applied by the Group, and IFRS issued by the International Accounting Standards Boards (IASB) as of the same date.


The SEC has adopted an accommodation permitting eligible foreign private issuers for their first year of reporting under IFRS to file two years rather than three years of statements of earnings and changes in shareholders’ equity prepared in accordance with IFRS. The financial year 2005 is Veolia Environnement’s first year of reporting under IFRS and as a result the reconciliation of net earnings and shareholders’ equity to U.S. GAAP, statement of financial position and statement of earnings covers the financial year 2005 and the comparable financial year 2004.


Note 50A.

Summary of significant differences between US GAAP and IFRS


The principal differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP as they relate to the Group are discussed in further detail below.


First time adoption of IFRS


The Group has elected to apply certain provision of IFRS 1 that generated some differences with US GAAP.


Goodwill: Businesses sold by Vivendi Universal


Upon forming the Group in 1999, Vivendi Universal sold some subsidiaries and affiliates to the Group. According to previous GAAP, these transactions were at market value which, in some cases, resulted in the creation of additional goodwill. In accordance with provision of IFRS 1, the Group has elected not to restate business combinations prior to January 1, 2004. 


Under U.S. GAAP, transfers of assets among entities under common control, including transfers of operating subsidiaries, are recorded at the predecessor’s historical cost basis.


Other intangible assets acquired in business combinations


Under IFRS, market shares, which were recognized under previous GAAP, are reclassified as goodwill on January 1, 2004. They were not amortized under previous GAAP.

According to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 141, market shares have been reclassified in goodwill as of January 1, 2002.


Net investment in a foreign entity


As permitted by IFRS 1, the Group has elected to reverse as at January 1, 2004 the accumulated foreign Currency Translation Adjustment (CTA) on foreign investments, including the fair value net of tax of the hedging instruments classified in net investment hedge, against retained earnings, as part of retained earnings. Consequently, the gain or loss on subsequent disposal excludes CTA that arose before the date of transition to IFRS.


Under US GAAP, such exemption does not apply and the reclassification made under IFRS 1 has been reversed to maintain historical amounts.


Pensions


Under IFRS, the Group has elected the exemption under IFRS 1 for immediate recognition of actuarial gains and losses in equity as of January 1, 2004 through equity.


Under US GAAP, such exemption does not apply and the entry recorded under IFRS has been reversed to maintain historical amounts.


Principal accounting differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP relating to the Group


Amortization of goodwill


Since January 1, 2004, in accordance with IFRS 3, the Group no longer amortizes goodwill.


Under US GAAP, goodwill is no longer amortized since January 1, 2002. This timing difference resulted in differences in book value of goodwill.


Impairment of goodwill


As required under both IFRS and US GAAP, the Group reviews the carrying value of the long-lived assets, including goodwill and other intangibles assets with indefinite life  at least annually. Under IFRS, goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite life are tested for impairment as part of a cash generating unit or a group of cash generating units which correspond to the new organization of the Group adopted in 2005.

Under US GAAP, the Group tested for impairment goodwill at the level of the reporting unit. Since 2000, the year of Veolia Environnement's creation, and the end of 2003, Veolia Environnement was organized into five divisions and consequently into five operating segments : Water, Waste Management, Energy Services, Transportation and FCC (a group specialized in public works and in the production of cement, proportionally consolidated under primary GAAP and accounted for under the equity method under U.S. GAAP).

The analysis by reporting unit was driven by the presence of US Filter and FCC until the sale these units. Both entities had been recently acquired (respectively 1999 and 1998) by Vivendi Universal, had specific risk profits and were subsequently sold in 2004. Therefore, in the Water division, Veolia Environnement identified two reporting units: (i) USFilter, an industrial group that produced water-related equipment for private and commercial customers and which was managed separately from the rest of the Group, and (ii) Water - Rest of the World, the business of which consisted mostly of managing concessions on behalf of public customers. Veolia Environnement identified three other reporting units, Waste Management, Energy Services and Transportation, which had homogenous business lines given their management of concessions on behalf of public clients. Finally, Veolia Environn ement identified Latin America as a reporting unit relating to activities that Veolia Environnement consolidates, in respect of which FCC was the second shareholder. Accordingly, depreciation tests by reporting unit reflected this reality.

Following the sale of US Filter and FCC in connection with Veolia Environnement's strategy to refocus on concessions, Veolia Environnement underwent a major internal reorganization in 2004 and 2005 on the basis of operating units, mainly organized around a dual analysis through geographical zones and reporting segment. The group considers that these operating units coincide with the reporting unit definition as set forth in FAS142:  



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-58



Back to contents


·

the operating unit is one level below an operating segment (water, waste, energy, transportation)

·

each operating unit has its own chief operating officer

·

at the level of each operating unit, there are similar contractual arrangements and operating methods with public authorities which are the main clients

·

the operating unit constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularity reviews the operating results of the operating unit.

The financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005 are the first one published since the reorganization implemented starting from 2004 is completed.

Given the completion in 2005 of the Group's operating reorganization in 2004, Veolia Environnement considered the impairment test for 2004 on the basis of reporting unit definitions that the Group applies for 2005. As a result, the US GAAP net income and shareholder's equity in 2004 have been restated by an amount of €69.3 million as a consequence of the impairment of Transportation North Europe and Energy Netherlands (see Note 50D).

Tangible assets


Under IFRS, each part of a tangible asset with a cost that is significant in relation to the total cost of the item shall be depreciated separately. Every component identified is depreciated according to its own useful life.


Under US GAAP, part or components of tangible assets are not depreciated separately but over the life of the assets. Subsequent costs identified as a component of a main asset are expenses.


Commitments to Maintain and Repair Assets


Under IFRS, the Group recorded the assets related to concession and affermage contracts on a separate line of the balance sheet, “Publicly-owned utility networks”. These assets are amortized or depreciated over their useful life in accordance with IAS 38 on intangible assets or IAS 16 on property, plant and equipment. In addition, the Group generally assumes a contractual obligation to maintain and repair facilities managed through public service contracts. In the case of publicly-owned utility networks accounted for in accordance with IAS 38, resulting maintenance and repair costs are analyzed in accordance with IAS 37 and, where appropriate, a provision for maintenance and repair costs is recorded when it is more likely than not that the settlement of which is expected to result in an outflow from the entity of resources embodying economic benefits.


Under US GAAP, the assets related to concession and affermage contracts are recorded as tangible assets. For maintenance and repair expenditures, the Group applies the expensed as incurred method instead of the components approach, which may lead it to capitalize and depreciate these expenditures separately.


Under US GAAP, the Group applies the expensed as incurred method for maintenance and repair expenditures.


Assets for retirement obligations


Under IFRS, reserves for site restoration are discounted at the rate in effect at the balance sheet date.


Under US GAAP and according to SFAS 143, these obligations are discounted at the rate in effect when the liability was initially recognized.


Arrangements containing a lease


Under IFRS, the Group has elected the early application of IFRIC 4 “Determining whether an arrangement contains a lease” in advance on January 1, 2004. Certain industrial contracts, Build, Operate & Transfer (BOT) contracts, incineration contracts and co-generation contracts have been considered as containing a lease that is accounted for as a financial lease in accordance with IAS 17. Consistent with IFRIC 4 the determination and the accounting of the financial asset as of January 1, 2004 has been made retrospectively.


Under US GAAP, Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 01-08 “Determining Whether an Arrangement Contains a Lease”, is effective prospectively for contracts entered into or significantly modified after January 1, 2004.  


Financial Instruments


Under IFRS, the option to convert the convertible bond into ordinary shares is initially classified separately as an equity instrument. The Group first determines the carrying amount of the liability component of the convertible bonds by measuring the fair value of a similar liability that does not have an associated equity component. The carrying amount of the equity instrument is then determined by deducting the fair value of the financial liability from the fair value of the compound financial instrument as a whole. The financial debt is accounted for at amortized cost.


Under US GAAP, the convertible bond is classified as financial debt for the entire amount.


Share-based payments


Under IFRS, the fair value of plans at grant date is recorded as an expense against equity at the date the employee or the counter-party renders service. According to IFRS2, only grants of shares and share options that were granted after 7 November 2002 and for which rights were not vested at 1 January 2005 are evaluated in personal costs.


Under US GAAP, the Group has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of FAS 123 and compensation costs are recognized using the intrinsic value method in accordance with Accounting Principle Board opinion No. 25, Accounting for stock issued to employees and Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No 44. These statements define plans relating to the grant or sale of common shares to employees as compensatory if such plans are not open to substantially all employees or do not require the employee to make a reasonable investment in the shares, usually defined as no less than 85% of the market value at the grant date. If a plan is deemed to be compensatory, Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25 requires the compensation arising from such plans be measured based on the intrinsic value of the shares granted or sold to employees. For fixed plans compensation is the difference bet ween the exercise price of the stock option and the market value of the corresponding shares at the grant date. For compensatory stock option plans, compensation is recognized in the period for which the relative service is performed.


Pension Plans


Minimum liability adjustments


Under IFRS, no minimum liability adjustment has to be recognized.


Under US GAAP, if the accumulated benefit obligation exceeds the fair value of plan assets by an amount in excess of any accrued or prepaid pension cost reported, the employer shall recognize in the statement of financial position a liability that is at least equal to the unfunded accumulated benefit obligation. If an additional minimum liability is recognized an equal amount shall be recognized as an intangible asset, provided that the asset shall not exceed the amount of unrecognized prior service cost. If an additional liability required to be recognized exceeds unrecognized prior service cost, the excess shall be reported as a reduction of equity.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-59



Back to contents



Actuarial gain and losses


Under IFRS, the Group has decided to apply IAS19 (revised) as of January 1, 2005 and, thus, actuarial profits and losses are allocated to equity.


Under US GAAP, amortization of an unrecognized net gain or loss shall be included as a component of  net pension cost for a year if, as of the beginning of the year that unrecognized net gain or loss exceeds 10 percent of the greater of the projected benefit obligation or the fair value of plan assets.


Principal presentation differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP relating to the Group


Use of the Proportionate Consolidation Method


Under IFRS, the Group has decided to retain the proportionate consolidation method, in accordance with IAS 31. This method is used for investments in jointly controlled companies, where the Group and other shareholders have agreed to exercise joint control through a mutual agreement between the partners. Under the proportionate consolidation method, the Group recognizes assets, liabilities, equity, revenues and expenses of subsidiaries to the extent of its interest in the Group ownership.


Under U.S. GAAP, when the Group does not exercise control over a subsidiary, but shares joint control over the entity, the Group uses the equity method to account for its investment. Summarized financial information for those investments accounted for under the proportionate consolidation method is included in note 40.


This difference in accounting policy has no effect on either net income or shareholders’ equity.


Commitments to purchase minority interests


Under IFRS, commitments granted by the Group to shareholders of certain of its fully consolidated subsidiaries to purchase their minority interest are reported, in accordance with IAS 32, as a financial liability at the present value of the purchase consideration. In the absence of guidance provided by IFRS 3 on business combination, the Group records the difference arising on initial recognition of these options, between the carrying amount of the minority interests and the present value of the purchase consideration through goodwill.


Under US GAAP, commitments to purchase minority interests are not recorded as a liability except if their fair market value is negative. In this case, any potential losses are recorded through income and classified as financial liabilities in the statement of financial position under US GAAP


This difference in accounting policy has no effect on either net income or shareholders’ equity but has a presentation effect on short term and long term financial liabilities and goodwill.


Income taxes


Under IFRS, the Group recognizes deferred tax assets on net operating loss carry forward or on temporary differences only when it is probable that the recovery of the related deferred tax asset will be realized.


Under U.S. GAAP, deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and net operating loss carried forward and are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized in a reasonable period of time.


This difference in accounting policy has no effect on either net income or shareholders’ equity but has a presentation effect on gross, net deferred tax assets.


Note 50B.

New accounting standards in the United States effective in 2006


On December 16, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) issued Statement No. 123 (revised 2004) “Share-Based Payment”. SFAS 123 (R) requires all share-based payments to employees to be measured at the fair value of the award. The statement was initially to be effective in the fist interim or annual reporting period beginning after June 15, 2005. On April 21, 2005, the Security and Exchange Commission adopted an amendment to rule 4-01(a) of regulation S-X regarding the compliance dates for SFAS No. 123 (R). The commission’s new rule allows companies to implement this statement at the beginning of their next fiscal year. As a result, our Group plans to adopt SFAS 123 (R), using the modified-prospective method under which compensation cost is recognized from the effective date on January 1, 2006 in connection with all share-based payments granted, modified or settl ed after January 1, 2006 as well as for any awards that were not fully vested as of January 1, 2006. The Group is currently assessing the impact of adopting SFAS 123 (R).


In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153 “Exchanges of Non monetary Assets”, an amendment of APB opinion N°29. SFAS 153 requires that exchanges of productive assets should be accounted for at fair value, unless neither the asset received nor the asset surrendered has a fair value that is determinable within reasonable limits or the transaction lacks commercial substance. SFAS 153 is effective for the period beginning January 1, 2006. The Group is currently assessing  the impact of adopting SFAS 153.


In June 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154 “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections”, a replacement of APB No. 20 “Accounting Changes” and FASB Statement No. 3 “Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements. SFAS 154 applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principle and also to changes required by an accounting pronouncement in the unusual instance that the pronouncement does not include specific transition provisions. SFAS 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements of changes in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS 154 is effective on January 1, 2006.


In November 2005, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS 115-1  “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments”. The FSP provides guidance on determining when investments in certain debt and equity securities are considered impaired, whether that impairment is other-than-temporary, and on measuring such impairment loss. The FSP also includes accounting considerations subsequent to the recognition of an other-than temporary impairment and requires certain disclosures about unrealized losses that have not been recognized as other-than-temporary impairments. The FSP is effective January 1, 2006. The Group is currently assessing  the impact of adopting this FSP.

In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155 “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Instruments – an Amendment to FASB Statements No. 133 and 140”. SFAS 155 permits fair value accounting for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that would otherwise require bifurcation in accordance with SFAS 133. Among other things, the statement also establishes a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation. The statement is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after January 1, 2007. The Group is currently assessing the impact of adopting this standard.




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-60



Back to contents


Note 50C.

Reconciliation of shareholders' equity and net income to U.S. GAAP


The following is a summary reconciliation of shareholders’ equity as reported in the consolidated balance sheet to shareholders’ equity as adjusted for the effects of the application of U.S. GAAP for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, and net income as reported in the consolidated statement of income to net income as adjusted for the effects of the application of U.S. GAAP for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 (in millions of euros).


 

At December 31,

 

2005

 

2004(1)

 
 

 

   

Shareholders' equity as reported in the consolidated balance sheets


3,802.6

 

3,222.8

 

Adjustments to conform to U.S. GAAP:

    

Goodwill, net of amortization


(988.1)

 

(1,020.4)

 

Goodwill impairment


(16.2)

 

0.2

 

Tangible assets components


(180.9)

 

(138.8)

 

Tangible assets amortization


12.1

 

6.6

 

Commitments to maintain and repair assets


139.5

 

163.2

 

Assets retirement obligations


16.1

 

15.2

 

Other reserves


20.9

 

17.9

 

IFRIC 4 / EITF 1.08 analysis


(121.0)

 

(94.7)

 

Financial instruments


1.7

 

11.0

 

Pensions plans and stock options


295.8

 

149.7

 

Others


(43.3)

 

(50.9)

 

Tax effect of above adjustments and income tax reserve


(106.3)

 

(26.3)

 

U.S. GAAP Shareholders' Equity


2,832.9

 

2,255.5

 

(1) As restated. See Note 50D.

    
  
 

2005

 

2004(1)

 
 

 

   

Net income/(loss) attributable to equity holders of the parent as reported in the consolidated statements of income


623.0

 

391.5

 

Adjustments to conform to U.S. GAAP:

    

Goodwill, net of amortization


35.7

 

(48.5)

 

Goodwill impairment


(5.1)

 

78.6

 

Effect of disposal of business on intangible assets


  

94.6

 

Cumulative Translation Adjustment included in gain/loss on disposal of business


  

(47.4)

 

Tangible assets components


(38.1)

 

(16.0)

 

Tangible assets amortization


(4.3)

 

(17.1)

 

Commitments to maintain and repair assets


(2.9)

 

(1.7)

 

Assets retirement obligations


0.0

 

16.6

 

Other reserves


4.5

 

(2.1)

 

IFRIC 4 / EITF 1.08 analysis


(6.5)

 

6.0

 

Financial instruments


(7.5)

 

(43.7)

 

Pensions plans and stock options


6.2

 

7.5

 

Others


3.4

 

(20.0)

 

Tax effect of above adjustments and income tax reserve


(52.7)

 

(253.0)

 

U.S. GAAP Net Income attributable to equity holders of the parent


555.7

 

145.2

 

(1) As restated. See Note 50D.


Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share


For U.S. GAAP purposes, basic earnings per share are computed in the same manner as basic earnings per share under IFRS, i.e., by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution that would occur if all securities and other contracts to issue ordinary shares were exercised or converted. Net income represents the earnings of the Group after minority interests. The computation of diluted earnings per share is as follows (except earnings per share, in millions of euros or millions of shares):


 

At December 31,

 

2005

 

2004(1)

 

Net income U.S. GAAP attributable to equity holders of the parent


555.7

 

145.2

 

Weighted average number of shares

    

Outstanding-basic


390.4

 

397.3

 

Dilutive effect of:

    

Shares issuable on exercise of dilutive options


2.0

 

-

 

Weighted average number of shares

    

Outstanding-diluted


392.4

 

397.3

 

Earnings per share:

    

Basic


1.42

 

0.37

 

Diluted


1.42

 

0.37

 

(1) As restated. See Note 50D.


Note 50D.

Restatement of the 2004 net income and shareholder's equity as prepared under US GAAP


As explained under Note 50A paragraph "Impairment of goodwill", given the completion in 2005 of the Group's operating reorganization in 2004, Veolia Environnement considered the impairment test for 2004 on the basis of reporting unit definitions that the Group applies for 2005. As a result, the US GAAP net income and shareholder's equity in 2004 have been restated by an amount of €69.3 million as a consequence of the impairment of Transportation North Europe and Energy Netherlands.


These adjustments decreased previously reported US GAAP income per share by €0.17.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-61



Back to contents



Note 50E.

Comprehensive income


The concept of comprehensive income does not exist under IFRS. In U.S. GAAP, SFAS 130 “Reporting comprehensive income” and concept statement 6 define comprehensive income. It mainly includes, net of tax impact (in millions of euros):

·

net income,

·

minimum pension liability adjustments (MLA),

·

unrealized gains and losses on investment securities classified as “available for sale” and on derivatives classified as cash flow hedge,

·

foreign currency translation adjustments.


 

Compre-hensiveIncome

 

Accumulated foreign translation

 

Accumulated unrealized gains (losses) on equity securities and hedging instruments

 

Minimum liability adjustments

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

Net income 2004 restated (U.S. GAAP)  

145.2(1)

        

Other comprehensive income 2004, net of tax (U.S. GAAP):


81.6

        

Including :

         

foreign currency translation adjustments


112.5

 

112.5

     

112.5

gain arising during the period on equity securities


5.8

   

5.8

   

5.8

unrealized losses on hedging derivatives


(36.7)

   

(36.7)

   

(36.7)

deferred income taxes


(3.0)

   

(2.1)

 

(0.9)

 

(3.0)

MLA


3.0

     

3.0

 

3.0

Comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2004 (U.S. GAAP)


226.8

 

(617.1)

 

(93.2 )

 

(1.5)

 

(711.8)

Net income 2005 (U.S. GAAP)


555.7

        

Other comprehensive income 2005, net of tax (U.S. GAAP):


245.3

        

Including :

         

foreign currency translation adjustments


263.8

 

263.8

     

263.8

loss arising during the period on equity securities


(2.0)

   

(2.0)

   

(2.0)

unrealized gain on hedging derivatives


29.6

   

29.6

   

29.6

deferred income taxes


11.3

   

4.6

 

6.7

 

11.3

MLA


(57.4)

     

(57.4)

 

(57.4)

Comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2005 (U.S. GAAP)


801.0

 

(353.3)

 

(61.0)

 

(52.2)

 

(466.5)

(1) As restated. See Note 50D.




Note 50F.

Change in shareholder's equity


December 31, 2003


2,378 

Net U.S. GAAP income 2004 (1)


145 

CTA


113 

Dividend and net income appropriation


(218)

Capital increase


25 

Stock based compensation


Change in treasury shares


(160)

Change in fair value of derivative


(37)

MLA

(3)

Other


13

December 31, 2004 (1)


2,256 

Net U.S. GAAP income 2005


556 

CTA


264 

Dividend and net income appropriation


(265)

Capital increase


47 

Stock based compensation


Change in treasury shares


Change in fair value of derivative


30 

MLA


(57)

Other


(7)

December 31, 2005


2,833 

(1) As restated. See Note 50D.




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-62



Back to contents



Note 50G.

Restructuring costs (according to IFRS consolidation scope)


Provisions for restructuring by segment details as follows (in millions of euros):


 

Change in scope of consolidation and other

Additions charged to operating income

Utilization

Reversal

Dec.31,2004

Change in scope of consolidation and other

Additions charged to operating Income

Utilization

Reversal

Dec.31,2005

Water


(5.4)

23.2

(19.3)

(3.9)

27.3

2.3

7.2

(19.5)

(0.4)

16.9

Other activities


13.3

22.9

(17.9)

(3.5)

27.3

2.3

7.2

(19.5)

(0.4)

16.9

Employee termination costs


13.3

22.9

(17.9)

(3.5)

27.3

2.3

7.2

(19.5)

(0.4)

16.9

United States Filter Corporation


(8.4)

0.3

(1.4)

(0.4)

Employee termination costs


(1.1)

0.3

(1.4)

Lease termination costs


(4.3)

(0.4)

Other restructuring costs


(3.0)

USFI—Benelux


(5.0)

Employee termination costs


(5.0)

Lease termination costs and other costs


USFI--Other locations


(5.3)

Employee termination costs


(5.3)

Energy


4.7

6.2

(6.7)

(1.4)

11.1

3.9

1.6

(7.3)

(0.2)

9.1

Employee termination costs


4.7

3.6

(4.7)

(0.2)

9.2

2.1

1.2

(5.9)

(0.1)

6.5

Other restructuring costs


2.6

(2.0)

(1.2)

1.9

1.8

0.4

(1.4)

(0.1)

2.6

Waste Management


(1.3)

6.4

(14.9)

(0.2)

4.6

1.1

1.0

(2.3)

(0.8)

3.6

Employee termination costs


(1.3)

6.4

(5.4)

(0.2)

4.6

(3.3)

(0.8)

(0.5)

Other restructuring costs


(9.5)

4.4

1.0

(1.5)

(0.3)

3.6

Transportation


2.0

(1.7)

(0.2)

3.2

1.2

(1.7)

(0.4)

2.3

Employee termination cost


2.0

(0.2)

2.4

1.2

(1.2)

(0.1)

2.3

Other restructuring costs


(1.7)

0.8

(0.5)

(0.3)

           

Total


(2.0)

37.8

(42.6)

(5.7)

46.2

7.3

11.0

(30.8)

(1.8)

31.9


Water


In 2004, the Water division sold "Consumer and Commercial" and "Equipment short-term contracts" activities of USFilter. Consequently there is no more restructuring costs in relation with these units.


In 2003, considering the decline of the activity in the Netherlands, Veolia Water Systems launched a downsizing program in the company Rossmark to take place in 2004, concerning 40 employees of whom 14 are executives for a total estimated cost of €5.0 million. In 2004, all the plans launched in 2002 (residual restructuring in the UK) and 2003 and relating to USFilter (VWSTI and Rossmark) are included in other activities column "change in scope of consolidation" for an amount of €10.3 million. The plans were carried out for a total cost of €7.5 million with the termination of 118 employees including 49 executives and the closure of 3 sites in France. The plans in France, the UK and in Rossmark have been partially completed in 2005 with the termination of 74 additional employees and the closure of one site for a total cost of 3.1 million. The remaining provision am ounted to €2.2 million as of December 31, 2005 compared to €4 million as of December 2004.In addition, following the acquisitions performed in Germany in 2004 and the transfer to VWS of North American operational entities from US Filter, 2 restructuring plans have been launched to reorganize those activities from amount of €4.1 million as of December 2004. In Germany, the plan is made of the closure of 3 sites and the termination of 66 employees for a total cost of €2.0 million. At the end of 2004, 1 site was already closed and 21 employees terminated. In 2005, the plan in Germany has been totally completed with the termination of 31 additional employees and the closure of one site.  In North America, for 2005, the plan has been partially completed with the termination of 30 additional employees and the remaining provision amounted to 1.1M€ as of December 31, 2005.


For Apa Nova Bucuresti, a plan has been presented to and accepted by personnel representatives at the end of 2004 to face a trend of declining volume in water consumption. This plan aims at a reduction of 250 white and blue collars between 2005 and 2006. Accordingly, an additional reserve of €3.1 million has been booked in 2004. In 2005, 148 employees were terminated for a total cost of €1 million. The plan is expected to be totally completed in 2006 and the remaining provision amounted to €2.6 million as of December 31, 2005.


In 2003, Berliner Wasserbetriebe (BWB), a joint venture held at 50% and accounted for under the proportional method, implemented a restructuring plan for adaptation to future market demands, by optimising processes and realigning the organization. Restructuring reserves are booked on an annual basis, according to the number of people accepting to enter the plan that is spread over several years. The potential number of employees concerned is 970. Termination costs for 147 employees were booked in 2003 for an amount of €10.0 million (at 100%). Employee termination costs of €2.0 million were used in 2003. In 2004, 136 new employees decided to join the plan. A related reserve of €16 million (at 100%) was thus accrued. Employee termination costs of €4.2 million were used in 2004. In 2005, 117 new employees decided to join the plan. A related reserve of EUR 9,6 million  (at 10 0%) was thus accrued. Employee termination costs of 15,2 million were used in 2005.


In the US, after the divesture of USfilter, water treatment activities have been reorganized and a restructuring plan was launched in the first half of the year 2004. The plan is made of the termination of 111 employees of whom 85 executives and for a total cost of €1.6 millions. At the end of 2004, 54 employees were already terminated and the remaining part of the plan has been completed in 2005.


Energy


In 2003, Dalkia International implemented restructuring plans to integrate recent acquisitions including DBU in the Netherlands, Pec Poznan in Poland and Giglio in Italy. These restructuring plans amount to a total of €5.8 million in termination costs for 215 employees of whom 26 are professional, other restructuring costs amount to €2.5 million, mainly utilized in 2004.


In 2004, further to the acquisition of a power plant in Poznan in Poland, Dalkia International implemented a restructuring plan for €4.7 million recognized in column "change in scope", of which €3.0 million have been utilized in 2005. This plan consists in termination costs for 210 employees. Additional restructuring plans were launched in DBU (Netherlands) for €3.1 million covering miscellaneous costs, the reserve utilized in 2005 amounted to 1.4 million.


In 2005, during the acquisition of a plant in Lodz in Poland, Dalkia International implemented a restructuring plan for €2.5 million recognized in column "change in scope". This plan consists in termination costs for 150 employees. Dalkia BV and Dalkia PLC recognize additional provision for, respectively,  €0.8 million and €0.3 million.


Waste management


Onyx as part of a program to reduce its overhead costs has implemented a reorganization of its IT services. The reserve amounted to €6.5 million as of January 1, 2004 and has been fully utilized over the course of 2004.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-63



Back to contents



At the end of 2003, Onyx decided to change its north american management, which led to a reserve of €5.2 million for employee termination costs. This reserve was fully used in 2004.


Reserve as at December 31, 2005 is relative to minor restructuring plans. The major of them amounts to €1.5 million for a plant of Valnor in France, covering contract termination costs.


Transportation


In Germany, Connex implemented a new restructuring plan in 2004 in connection with the reorganization by region and moving out of the headquarters. This plan amounts to €2.7 million, consisting in termination costs of 100 employees, of whom 6 were executives. The reserve utilized in 2005 amounted to 1.3 million.


The reorganization of the Swedish activities led to an additional provision of €1.2 million in 2005, of which €0.3 million were already utilized.


Note 50H.

Stock based compensation


Veolia Environnement stock option plans

Under US GAAP, the Group accounts for stock-based compensation based upon the provisions of APB Opinion No. 25.  Pro forma information, as if Veolia Environnement applied SFAS 123, is presented in note 50K.  Under IFRS, compensation expense has been recorded based upon the fair value measured at the grant date. In accordance with the transitional provisions of IFRS 2 an expense has only been recorded for those plans granted after November 7, 2002 and for which the rights had not vested as of January 1, 2005.  

The compensation expense recorded by the Group under IFRS was €16.2 million and €6.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 respectively.  Under US GAAP, the expense recorded by the Group was €3.2 million and €0.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 respectively.

Employee Stock Purchase Plans

Under IFRS, in accordance with the transitional provisions of IFRS2, no compensation expense has been recorded for Employee Stock Purchase Plans granted in 2004 because the awards were fully vested as of January 1, 2005. The compensation cost recorded by the Group for the year ended December 31, 2005 was €14.1 million.

Under US GAAP, the compensation costs recorded by the Group for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 were €14.1 million and €10.3 million respectively, applying the intrinsic value method.

Note 50I.

Pension plan and other post retirement benefits other than pension plans


Under IFRS the Group uses the proportionate consolidation method for subsidiaries over which the Group and other shareholders have agreed to exercise joint control over significant financial and operating policies. Under US GAAP those subsidiaries which are consolidated using the proportionate consolidation method under IFRS are accounted for using the equity method (see Note 50A).The other principal difference between US GAAP and IFRS is that the Group has decided to recognize directly in equity actuarial gains and losses in the period in which they occur under IFRS, whilst under US GAAP actuarial gains and losses are amortized through the income statement using the corridor method.

The disclosures below show the benefit obligations, assets, funded status and balance sheet impact, as well as net periodic expense and assumptions associated with the defined benefit pension plans and other post-employment benefit plans as computed in accordance with FAS 87 and FAS 106.


Disclosures presented in accordance with SFAS 132, are as follows (in millions of euros):


 

Pension Benefits          

 

Other Benefits          

 

2005

2004

 

2005

2004

Benefit obligation at beginning of year

852.3

715.0

 

24.0

0.0

Service cost

37.9

47.6

 

0.4

0.4

Interest cost

43.6

38.6

 

1.2

1.5

Plan participants’ contributions

5.2

3.4

 

-

-

Disposals

(0.8)

(35.1)

 

-

-

Curtailments & settlements

(9.5)

(4.7)

 

(3.1)

-

Actuarial loss (gain)

181.2

31.0

 

-

-

Benefits paid

(54.2)

(38.0)

 

(1.5)

(1.9)

Plan amendments

4.7

12.8

 

-

8.0

Others (including business combinations and foreign currency translation)

38.9

81.6

 

3.1

16.0

Benefit obligations at end of year

1,099.3

852.3

 

22.3

24.0




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-64



Back to contents





 

Pension Benefits          

 

Other Benefits          

 

2005

2004

 

2005

2004

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

539.3

483.3

 

-

-

Actual return on plan assets

80.1

49.8

 

-

-

Group contributions

54.5

22.3

 

-

-

Plan participants’ contributions

5.2

3.4

 

-

-

Disposals

-

(27.5)

 

-

-

Curtailments & settlements

(3.6)

(0.3)

 

-

-

Benefits paid

(34.1)

(23.8)

 

-

-

Others (including business combinations and foreign currency translation)

14.0

32.0

 

-

-

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

662.6

539.3

 

-

-



Group pension plan assets were invested as follows as of December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, by asset category are as follows:



 

2005

2004

Equity securities

48%

42%

Debt securities

36%

37%

Insurance contracts

11%

14%

Cash

5%

6%


 

Pension Benefits          

 

Other Benefits          

 

2005

2004

 

2005

2004

Funded status of plan

(436.7)

(313.0)

 

(22.3)

(24.0)

Unrecognized actuarial loss

296.0

172.2

 

1.9

5.8

Unrecognized actuarial prior service cost

35.4

36.3

 

7.7

7.6

Others

(74.0)

(37.4)

 

-

(13.4)

Accrued benefit cost under US GAAP

(179.3)

(141.8)

 

(12.8)

(24.0)


The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for those pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets were €664.0 million, €531.5 million and €251.2 million as of December 31, 2005 and €458.9 million, €377.5 million and €157.0 as of December 31, 2004.

The allocation of the projected benefit obligation of €1,099.3 million and the accumulated benefit obligation of €896.7 million by area is as follows: at the end of 2005, €655.6 million and €542.8 million in the United Kingdom, €321.2 million and €249.3 million in France and €122.5 million and €104.6 million in other countries.

The fair value of plan assets in France amounted to €71.3 million at the end of 2005.  The Group’s domestic plan assets are invested principally in insurance companies’ funds.  The expected long-term rates of return on these assets are directly based on historical returns.  Contributions paid to these plan assets are essentially discretional contributions without contractual or legal requirements.  The accumulated benefit obligation for domestic plans was €249.3 million as of December 31, 2005.

The Fair value of plan assets in the United Kingdom amounted to €569.3 million at the end of 2005.  These assets are invested essentially in equities and bonds through a trustee structure.  The expected long-term rate of return on these assets are based upon statistical returns and observed market performances over a long-term basis.  The accumulated benefit obligation for these plans was €542.8 million as of December 31, 2005.




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-65



Back to contents


Amounts recognized in the balance sheet consist of (in millions of euros):


 

Pension Benefits          

 

Other Benefits          

 

2005

2004

 

2005

2004

Accrued benefit liability (including MLA)

(319.0)

(267.9)

 

(12.8)

(24.0)

Prepaid benefit costs

139.7

126.1

 

-

-

Net amount accrued for under US GAAP

(179.3)

(141.8)

 

(12.8)

(24.0)

Intangible assets

21.4

16.3

 

-

7.6

Net amount recognized under US GAAP

(157.9)

(125.5)

 

(12.8)

(16.4)


Net accruals in US GAAP can be compared with balances determined under IFRS as follows:

 

Pension Benefits          

 

Other Benefits          

 

2005

2004

 

2005

2004

Net amount accrued for under US GAAP

(179.3)

(141.8)

 

(12.8)

(24.0)

Changes in scope

(104.9)

(73.0)

 

(3.6)

(2.6)

Minimum liability adjustments

74.0

37.4

 

-

-

Recognition of actuarial gains and losses through shareholders’ equity

(349.6)

(177.3)

 

(1.0)

9.7

Net amount accrued for under IFRS

(559.8)

(354.7)

 

(17.4)

(16.9)



Net periodic cost under U.S. GAAP was as follows (in millions of euros):


 

Pension Benefits          

 

Other Benefits          

 

2005

2004

 

2005

2004

Service cost

37.9

47.6

 

0.4

0.4

Interest cost

43.6

38.6

 

1.2

1.5

Expected return on plan assets

(35.5)

(33.9)

 

-

-

Amortization of unrecognized prior service costs

2.5

0.9

 

0.5

0.2

Amortization of actuarial net loss (gain)

11.1

7.9

 

0.2

0.6

Amortization of net transition obligation

-

(6.4)

 

-

-

Curtailments/Settlements

(4.4)

(0.9)

 

-

(6.8)

Others

2.6

(3.5)

 

-

-

Net periodic benefit cost under US GAAP

57.8

50.3

 

2.2

(4.1)


The Group expects to contribute €30.1 million to its pension and postretirement benefit plans in 2006.  Expected future benefit payments are as follows (in millions of euros):


 

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011-15

Expected future benefit payments

51.3

40.1

44.5

46.2

47.4

331.0




VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-66



Back to contents



Actuarial assumptions – US GAAP


The following are weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligation at December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004:


 

Pension Benefits          

 

Other Benefits          

 

2005

2004

 

2005

2004

Discount rate

4.5%

5.0%

 

5.8%

5.6%

Expected rate of compensation increase

3.3%

3.8%

 

-

-


The following are weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligation at December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004:


 

Pension Benefits          

 

Other Benefits          

 

2005

2004

 

2005

2004

Discount rate

5.0%

5.4%

 

5.8%

5.6%

Expected return on plan assets

6.4%

6.6%

 

-

-

Expected rate of compensation increase

3.8%

3.8%

 

-

-

Expected residual active life (in years)

14.8

15.0

 

9.0

12.4


Note 50J.

Goodwill and other intangible assets


The goodwill under US GAAP amounts to € 3,419 million in 2004 and € 3,817 million in 2005.


The indefinite-lived assets under US GAAP amount to € 90 million in 2004 and € 89 million in 2005.


The definite-lived assets under US GAAP amount to € 927 million in 2004 and € 1,252 million in 2005.


The impairments under US GAAP recognized in 2004 amount to € 74 million and to € 23 million in 2005.


Note 50K.

Pro-forma information


a)

Veolia Environnement stock option plans


Veolia Environnement applies the intrinsic value method to account for compensation cost associated with options granted to employees (see Note 50H).


The average fair value of Veolia Environnement options granted in 2004, 2003 and 2002 was €6.56, €5.09 and €15.3 respectively, using the Binomial option pricing model with the following assumptions for the grants:


Veolia Environnement

2004

 

2003

 

2002

Expected life (in years)


7.5

 

7.23

 

7.50

Interest rate


3.40%

 

3.90%

 

4.33%

Volatility


21.45%

 

22.67%

 

30.00%

Dividend yield


2.1%

 

1.00%

 

1.00%


Pro forma net income and basic earnings per share are presented below, as if compensation cost for stock options awarded under these plans had been determined based on the fair value at the dates of grant.


b)

Pro forma net income and basic earnings per share


Veolia Environnement’s pro forma net income and basic earnings per share are calculated as follows (in millions of euros, except per share data):


(€ millions)

At December 31,          

 

2005

 

2004 (1)

Net income (loss) under US GAAP as reported


555.7

 

145.2

 

Include: total stock based-employee compensation expense determined under APB25 for all awards net of related tax effects


1.9

 

0.3

 

Deduct: total stock based-employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects


(14.8)

 

(17.0)

 

Deduct: net income of discontinued operations


-

 

225.7

Pro forma net income (loss)


542.8

 

354.2

Net income (loss) basic earning per share


1.42

 

0.37

Net income (loss) diluted earning per share


1.42

 

0.37

Net income (loss) pro forma per share


1.39

 

0.89

Net income (loss) pro forma diluted per share


1.38

 

0.89

(1) As restated. See note 50D paragraph “Impairment of goodwill”


Note 50L.

Subsequent events


On April 10, 2006, we sold our interest in Southern Water to Southern Water Capital Limited, the current majority shareholder in Southern Water.

In connection with the development of its activities in Central and Eastern Europe, Veolia Transportation signed a contract with EBRD (European Bank of Reconstruction and Development) in December 2005 to acquire a 35% interest in the holding company that manages activities in this region. The holding company will conduct a share capital increase in order to allow Veolia Transportation to acquire its stake. This transaction is subject to the approval of the Bundeskartellamt.

Finally, on May 31, 2006, Butler Capital Partners, Veolia Transportation and CGMF signed agreements on the takeover of the Société Nationale Maritime Corse Méditerranée (SNCM), a state owned company providing ferry services mainly between mainland France and Corsica. The agreements form part of a turnaround plan that was first decided on by the French government at the beginning of 2005. The agreements and finalization of the transaction remain subject to the approval of the European Commission under rules governing state aid. SNCM’s share capital is expected to break down as follows by the end of 2006: Butler Capital Partners (38%), Veolia Transportation (28%), French government (25%) and SNCM employees (9%). Veolia Transportation has developed ferry services for several years in Scandinavian countries, and expects SNCM to generate new growth opportunities in the Mediterranean basin.



VEOLIA - Form 20-F | F-67



Back to contentsContents


SIGNATURES


The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.


 

VEOLIA ENVIRONNEMENT S.A.

  

By:

/s/ Jérôme Contamine


 

Name: Jérôme Contamine

 

Title: Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date: June 29, 2006May 7, 2008






Back to Contents


EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit

VEOLIANumber -

Description


1

Articles of Association (statuts) of Veolia Environnement (free English translation).


8

List of Subsidiaries. Included herein in Note 45 to our consolidated financial statements.


11

Code of Ethics (previously filed as Exhibit 11 to our annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 and incorporated by reference herein).


12.1

Certifications by Henri Proglio, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Jérôme Contamine, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


13.1

Certifications by Henri Proglio, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Jérôme Contamine, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


15.1

Excerpt of report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors for 2007 as required by Art. 117 of the French Financial Security Law (Loi de Sécurité Financière) (free English translation)


15.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms.