As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 29, 2007April 19, 2010

 


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 20-F



REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20062009

OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


Commission File Number: 001-15248


VEOLIA ENVIRONNEMENT

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

N/A
(Translation of Registrant’s
name into English)

36/38, avenue Kléber,
75116 Paris,
France

Republic of France
(Jurisdiction of incorporation
or organization)

(Address of principal executive offices)


Olivier Orsini, Secretary General, 36/38 avenue Kléber, 75116 Paris France 011 33 1 71 75 01 26

(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)


Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Name of each exchange on which registered

————

————

Ordinary shares, nominal value €5 per share represented by American Depositary Shares
(as evidenced by American Depositary Receipts),
each American Depositary Share representing one ordinary share*

The New York Stock Exchange


Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
None

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:

410,795,840493,630,374 ordinary shares, nominal value €5 per share

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act:

Yes

Yes No

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:

Yes

Yes No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:

Yes

Yes No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Large accelerated filer Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

U.S. GAAP    International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board    Accelerated filer Non-accelerated filer Other

IndicateIf “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow:follow.

Item 17   Item 18

Item 18

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):

Yes

Yes No

*Listed, not for trading or quotation purposes, but only in connection with the registration of the American Depositary Shares pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 








Back to contents



FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

We make some forward-looking statements in this document. When we use the words “aim(s),” “expect(s),” “feel(s),” “will,” “may,” “believe(s),” “anticipate(s)” and similar expressions in this document, we are intending to identify those statements as forward-looking. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this document. In particular, from time to time in this document we state our expectations in terms of revenue to be generated under new contracts recently won or awarded or from new investments made and new assets or operations acquired, though we may have not yet commenced operations under these new contractscontra cts nor begun operating these new assets and operations at the time we make these statements. Some of these revenue estimates are based on our management’s current assumptions regarding future sales volumes and prices, which are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that may cause actual sales volumes and prices to differ materially from those projected. As a result, actual revenue recorded under these new contracts or from these new investments, assets and operations may differ materially from those set forth in this document. Other than in connection with applicable securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publish revised forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this document or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. We urge you to carefully review and consider the various disclosures we make concerning the factors that may affect our business, including the disclosures made in “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors,” “Item 7;Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects,” “Item 8. Financial Information Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information – Significant Changes” and “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”

Unless otherwise indicated, information and statistics presented herein regarding market trends and our market share relative to our competitors are based on our own research and various publicly available sources.



i




Back to contents



TABLE OF CONTENTS


ITEM 1.

IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

1

ITEM 2.

OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

1

ITEM 3.

KEY INFORMATION SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

1

ITEM 4.

INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

811

ITEM 4A.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

5369

ITEM 5.

OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

5470

ITEM 6.6

DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT

84121

ITEM 7.

MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

111167

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL INFORMATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION

114170

ITEM 9.

THE OFFER AND LISTING TRADING MARKETS

120178

ITEM 10.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

123181

ITEM 11.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

134197

ITEM 12.

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

140197

ITEM 12D.

AMERICAN DEPOSITARY SHARES

197

ITEM 13.

DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES

141199

ITEM 14.

MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS
AND USE OF PROCEEDS

141199

ITEM 15.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

141199

ITEM 16A.

AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

141200

ITEM 16B.

CODE OF ETHICS

142200

ITEM 16C.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

142200

ITEM 16D.

EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES

142201

ITEM 16E.

PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

143201

ITEM 16F.

CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT

202

ITEM 16G.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

202

ITEM 17.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

144204

ITEM 18.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

144204

ITEM 19.

EXHIBITS

144204





ii




Back to contentsContents



PART I

ITEM 1.

IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

Not Applicable.

ITEM 2.

OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

Not Applicable.

ITEM 3.

KEY INFORMATION

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

You should read the following selected financial data together with “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and our consolidated financial statements. Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) adopted by the European Union as of December 31, 2006 and with IFRS issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) and with IFRS as ofadopted by the same date. IFRS differ in certain significant respects from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”).  For a description of the principal differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP as they relate to us and to our consolidated subsidiaries, and for a reconciliation of our shareholders’ equity and net income to U.S. GAAP, see Note 51 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 18 of this annual report.European Union. See also “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” for a discussion of accounting changes, business combinations and dispositions of business operations that affect the comparability of the information provided below.

Concession contracts are accounted for in the 2006 consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRIC Interpretation 12,Service Concession Arrangements (IFRIC 12), published in November 2006. This interpretation, which is pending adoption by the European Union following a favorable vote of the EFRAG in March 2007, is applicable to accounting periods commencing on or after January

1 2008. We have elected early adoption of this interpretation, and the change in accounting method has been applied retrospectively.  As such, our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005, and 2004 financial information have been adjusted accordingly for the retrospective adoption of IFRIC 12.






Back to contentsContents




At and for the year ended December 31

At and for the year ended December 31,

(in US$)(1)

  

(in €)

  

(in US$)(1)

(in €)

————

————

————

————

————

————

————

(millions, except per share amounts)(5)

2006

2006

2005
adjusted*

2004 adjusted*

2003

2002

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

————

————

————

————

————

————

————

INCOME STATEMENT DATA:

        

Amounts in accordance with IFRS

      

Revenue

37,693.1

28,620.4

25,570.4

22,792.4

--

--

49,774.2

34,551.0

35,764.8

31,574.1

27,653.1

24,684.9

Operating income

2,809.3

2,132.9

1,892.9

1,489.6

--

--

2,910.2

2,020.1

1,960.8

2,461.1

2,108.4

1,867.7

Net income from continuing operations

1,309.5

994.3

794.4

640.0

--

--

1,274.5

884.7

570.0

1,273.9

985.1

801.4

Net income (expense) from discontinued operations

0.79

0.6


0.7


(38.1)

--

--

(61.7)

(42.8)

139.2

(19.1)

9.8

(6.3)

Minority interest

311.1

236.2

172.9

212.1

--

--

371.4

257.8

304.1

326.9

236.2

172.9

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent

999.2

758.7


622.2


389.8

--

--

841.5

584.1

405.1

927.9

758.7

622.2

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent per share—Basic(2)

2.54

1.93


1.59


0.98

--

--

1.79

1.24

0.88

2.13

1.88

1.55

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent per share—Diluted(3)

2.52

1.91


1.59


0.98

--

--

1.79

1.24

0.87

2.11

1.86

1.55

Net income from continuing operations per share—Basic(2)

2.54

1.93


1.59


1.47

--

--

Net income from continuing operations per share—Diluted(3)

2.52

1.91


1.58



1.47

--

--

Net income from continuing operations attributable to equity holders of the parent per share—Basic(2)

1.92

1.33

0.71

2.19

1.87

1.58

Net income from continuing operations attributable to equity holders of the parent per share—Diluted(3)

1.92

1.33

0.71

2.17

1.85

1.57

Dividends per share

1.38

1.05

  

--

--

1.74

1.21(4)

1.21

1.05

0.85

Number of shares (adjusted to reflect changes in capital)

412,626,550

412,626,550(4)

407,872,606

406,421,983

--

--

493,630,374

472,576,666

471,762,756

412,626,550

407,872,606

  

BALANCE SHEET DATA (AT PERIOD END):

  

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

10,747.7

7,460.6

7,001.2

7,612.9

4,360.8

3,790.2

Minority interests

3,846.5

2,670.1

2,530.5

2,577.8

2,192.6

1,888.0

Total assets

71,765.9

49,816.7

49,126.1

46,306.9

40,123.7

36,381.0

Total non-current assets

42,634.6

29,595.0

30,041.8

28,970.4

25,100.0

22,834.9

Total non-current liabilities

31,734.8

22,028.9

21,320.0

18,045.4

18,056.3

16,934.0

  

CASH FLOW DATA:

  

Net cash flow from operating activities

5,707.9

3,962.2

3,750.0

3,634.6

3,389.6

3,163.7

Net cash from (used in) investing activities

(2,394.1)

(1,661.9)

(3,335.1)

(4,018.4)

(2,904.0)

(2,407.6)

Net cash used in financing activities

(776.9)

(539.3)

289.6

940.8

(71.5)

(3,152.8)

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

(3,552.1)

(2,465.7)

(2,780.6)

(2,518.7)

(2,017.6)

(1,837.1)

(1)

For your convenience, we have converted the euro amounts of our selected financial data into U.S. dollars using the December 31, 2009 rate of $1.00 = €0.69415. This does not mean that we actually converted, or could have converted, those amounts into U.S. dollars on this or any other date.

(2)

Pursuant to IAS 33, the weighted average number of shares outstanding taken into account for the calculation of 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005 net income per share was adjusted following the distribution of a share dividend in June 2009 (cf. Note 26 of our Consolidated Financial Statements). Based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding in each period for the calculation of basic earnings per share, equal to 471.7 million shares in 2009, 462.2 million shares in 2008, and 434.8 million shares in 2007, 403.6 million shares in 2006, and 400.4 million shares in 2005.

(3)

Pursuant to IAS 33, the weighted average number of shares outstanding taken into account for the calculation of 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005 net income per share was adjusted following the distribution of a share dividend in June 2009 (cf Note 26 of our Consolidated Financial Statements). Based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding in each period for the calculation of diluted earnings per share equal to 471.7 million shares in 2009, 464.0 million shares in 2008 and 439.8 million shares in 2007, 407.2 million shares in 2006, and 402.4 million shares in 2005.

(4)

Amount of dividend distribution per share to be proposed to the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting of May 7, 2010.

(5)

In accordance with IFRS 5, Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations, the results of operations of:

• the Clemessy and Crystal entities in the Energy Services Division, divested in December 2008;

• the entities of the U.S. waste-to-energy activity in Environmental Services (Montenay International) and Freight activities (essentially in France, Germany and the Netherlands) divested in the second half of 2009;

• Transportation activities in the United Kingdom and renewable energy activities in the process of divestiture at the year end 2009, are presented in a separate line, “Net income from discontinued operations,” for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005.

(1)

For your convenience, we have converted the euro amounts of our selected financial data into U.S. dollars using the December 31, 2009 rate of $1.00 = €0.69415. This does not mean that we actually converted, or could have converted, those amounts into U.S. dollars on this or any other date.

(2)

Pursuant to IAS 33, the weighted average number of shares outstanding taken into account for the calculation of 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005 net income per share was adjusted following the distribution of a share dividend in June 2009 (cf. Note 26 of our Consolidated Financial Statements). Based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding in each period for the calculation of basic earnings per share, equal to 471.7 million shares in 2009, 462.2 million shares in 2008, and 434.8 million shares in 2007, 403.6 million shares in 2006, and 400.4 million shares in 2005.

(3)

Pursuant to IAS 33, the weighted average number of shares outstanding taken into account for the calculation of 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005 net income per share was adjusted following the distribution of a share dividend in June 2009 (cf Note 26 of our Consolidated Financial Statements). Based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding in each period for the calculation of diluted earnings per share equal to 471.7 million shares in 2009, 464.0 million shares in 2008 and 439.8 million shares in 2007, 407.2 million shares in 2006, and 402.4 million shares in 2005.

(4)

Amount of dividend distribution per share to be proposed to the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting of May 7, 2010.

(5)

In accordance with IFRS 5, Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations, the results of operations of:

• the Clemessy and Crystal entities in the Energy Services Division, divested in December 2008;

• the entities of the U.S. waste-to-energy activity in Environmental Services (Montenay International) and Freight activities (essentially in France, Germany and the Netherlands) divested in the second half of 2009;

• Transportation activities in the United Kingdom and renewable energy activities in the process of divestiture at the year end 2009, are presented in a separate line, “Net income from discontinued operations,” for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005.


Amounts in accordance with U.S. GAAP

      

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent

964.2

732.1

555.7

145.2

(1,826.9)

(1,988.8)

Basic earnings per share

2.45

1.86

1.42

0.37

(4.56)

(5.45)

Diluted earnings per share

2.42

1.84

1.42

0.37

(4.56)

(5.45)

       

BALANCE SHEET DATA (AT PERIOD END):

      

Amounts in accordance with IFRS

      

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

5,743.2

4,360.8

3,790.2

3,211.2

--

--

Minority interest

2,887.7

2,192.6

1,888.0

1,728.7

--

--

Total assets

52,843.0

40,123.7

36,381.0

35,899.3

--

--

Total non-current assets

33,056.8

25,100.0

22,834.9

20,733.3

--

--

Total non-current liabilities

23,780.2

18,056.3

16,934.0

14,836.4

--

--

       

Amounts in accordance with U.S. GAAP

      

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

4,185.2

3,177.8

2,832.9

2,255.5

2,378.1

4,923.2

       

CASH FLOW DATA:

      

Amounts in accordance with IFRS

      

Net cash flow from operating activities

4,464.1

3,389.6

3,163.7

3,384.3

--

--

Net cash from (used in) investing activities

(3,824.6)

(2,904.0)


(2,407.6)


318.9

--

--

Net cash used in financing activities

(94.2)

(71.5)

(3,152.8)

(1,795.5)

--

--

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

(2,657.2)

(2,017.6)


(1,837.1)


(1,723.0)

--

--



2



(1)

For your convenience, we have converted the euro amounts of our selected financial data into U.S. dollars using the December 31, 2006 rate of$1.00 = €0.7593. This does not mean that we actually converted, or could have converted, those amounts into U.S. dollars on this or any other date.

(2)

Based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding in each period for the calculation of basic earnings per share, equal to 393.8 million shares in 2006, 390.4 million shares in 2005 and 396.2 million shares in 2004.

(3)

Based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding in each period for the calculation of diluted earnings per share, equal to 397.6 million shares in 2006, 392.4 million shares in 2005 and 396.3 million shares in 2004.

(4)

The number of shares as of December 31, 2006 mentioned above includes the exercise of options to subscribe for shares of our company which occurred from July 1 to December 31, 2006.  The share capital increase and the creation of shares resulting from such exercise of stock options was formally recorded by our board of directors on March 7, 2007.

*

Accounts as of December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 were adjusted for the application of IFRIC12 standards for the treatment of concessions, so as to ensure the comparability of the fiscal years.





Back to contentsContents



Dividends

Under French law and our articles of association (statuts), our statutory net income in each fiscal year, as increased or reduced, as the case may be, by any profits or losses carried forward from prior years, less any contributions to legal reserves, is available for distribution to our shareholders as dividends, subject to other applicable requirements of French law and ourstatuts.

At our general shareholders’ meeting on May 10, 2007,7, 2010, our shareholders approvedwill decide on a dividend payment proposed to be €1.21 per share in respect of our 2009 fiscal year, which will be paid beginning on June 9, 2010. The dividend will be payable in cash or in shares, and the period during which shareholders may choose the option of the payment of the dividend in cash or in shares, subject to applicable legal restrictions, will begin on May 14, 2010 and end on May 31, 2010. Subject to the approval of the general shareholders’ meeting, new shares will be issued with a discount of 10% off the average opening price on Euronext Paris of the shares over the twenty trading days prior to the day of the general shareholders’ meeting approving the dividend, less the amount of the dividend. We expect that Bank of New York Mellon as depositary will make this option availabl e to ADR holders. On June 8, 2009, we paid a dividend of €1.21 per share in respect of our 2008 fiscal year. On May 27, 2008, we paid a dividend of €1.21 per share in respect of our 2007 fiscal year. On May 15, 2007, we paid a dividend of €1.05 per share in respect of ourthe 2006 fiscal year, which was paid on May 15, 2007.year. On May 29, 2006, we paid a dividend of €0.85 per share in respect of the 2005 fiscal year. On May 27, 2005, we paid a dividend of €0.68 per share in respect of the 2004 fiscal year. On May 28, 2004, we paid a dividend of €0.55 per share in respect of the 2003 fiscal year. On May 7, 2003, we paid a dividend of €0.55 per share in respect of the 2002 fiscal year.  

Dividends paid to holders of our ADSs and non-French resident holders of our shares normally are subject to a 25% French withholding tax. However, non-resident holders that are entitled to and comply with the procedures for claiming benefits under an applicable tax treaty may be subject to a reduced rate of withholding tax (15% for holders who are residents of the United States) and be entitled to certain benefits. See “Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation” for a summary of the material U.S. federal and French tax consequences to holders of shares and ADSs. Holders of shares or ADSs should consult their own tax advisers with respect to the tax consequences of an investment in the shares or ADSs. In addition, dividends paid to holders of ADSs will be subject to a charge by the depositary for any expenses incurred by the depositary of the ADSs in the conversion of euroe uro to dolla rs.dollars.

Exchange Rate Information

Share capital in our companyCompany is represented by ordinary shares with a nominal value of €5 per share (generally referred to as “our shares”). Our shares are denominated in euro. Because we intend to pay cash dividends denominated in euro, exchange rate fluctuations will affect the U.S. dollar amounts that shareholders will receive on conversion of dividends from euro to dollars.

The following table shows the euro/U.S. dollar exchange rate from 20022005 through May 2007April 2010 based on the noon buying rate expressed in U.S. dollars per euro. The information concerning the U.S. dollar exchange rate is based on the noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in foreign currencies as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the “Noon Buying Rate”). We provide the exchange rates below solely for your convenience. We do not represent that euros were, could have been, or could be, converted into U.S. dollars at these rates or at any other rate. For information regarding the effect of currency fluctuations on our results of operations, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.”

Month

Period

Average

  

U.S. dollar/Euro

End

rate*

High

Low

 

————

————

————

————

May 2007

1.36

1.35

1.36

1.34

April 2007

1.36

1.35

1.36

1.34

March 2007

1.33

1.32

1.34

1.31

February 2007

1.32

1.31

1.32

1.29

January 2007

1.30

1.30

1.33

1.29

December 2006

1.32

1.32

1.33

1.31

     

Year

    

U.S. dollar/Euro

    
     

2006

1.32

1.26

1.33

1.19

2005

1.18

1.24

1.35

1.17

2004

1.35

1.24

1.36

1.18

2003

1.26

1.13

1.26

1.04

2002

1.05

0.95

1.05

0.86

     



3


*

The average of the Noon Buying Rates on the last business day of each month (or portion thereof) during the relevant period for year average; on each business day of the month (or portion thereof) for monthly average.


Back to Contents



Month

Period

Average

  

U.S. dollar/Euro

End

rate*

High

Low

April 2009 (through April 9th, 2010)

1.35

1.34

1.36

1.33

March 2010

1.35

1.36

1.38

1.33

February 2010

1.37

1.37

1.40

1.34

January 2010

1.39

1.42

1.45

1.39

December 2009

1.43

1.45

1.51

1.42

November 2009

1.49

1.49

1.50

1.46

October 2009

1.47

1.48

1.50

1.45

     

Year

    

U.S. dollar/Euro

    
     

2009

1.43

1.39

1.51

1.25

2008

1.39

1.47

1.60

1.24

2007

1.47

1.38

1.49

1.29

2006

1.32

1.26

1.33

1.19

2005

1.18

1.24

1.35

1.17

*

The average of the Noon Buying Rates on the last business day of each month (or portion thereof) during the relevant period for year average; on each business day of the month (or portion thereof) for monthly average.


Solely for the convenience of the reader, this annual report contains translations of certain euro amounts into U.S. dollars. These translations should not be construed as representations that the converted amounts actually represent such U.S. dollar amounts or could have been or will be converted into U.S. dollars at the rate indicated or at all. The translations from euro to U.S. dollars in this annual report are based on $1.00 = € 0.7593,€0.69415, the Noon Buying Rate on December 31, 2006.2009. On June 28, 2007,April 9th, 2010, the Noon Buying Rateexchange rate as published by Bloomberg at approximately 1:00 p.m. (New York time) was U.S.$1.3466 1.3468 per one euro.



4



Back to contentsContents



RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider the risk factors described below in addition to the other information presented in this document.

Risks Relating to Our Operations

We may suffer reduced profits or losses as a result of intense competition.

Our business is highly competitive and requires substantial human and capital resources. resources and cutting-edge technical expertise in numerous areas.

Large international competitors and local niche companies serve each of the markets in which we compete. Accordingly, we must make constant efforts to remain competitive and convince potential clientscustomers of the quality and cost value of our service offerings. CompetitorsWe may also introduceneed to develop new technology ortechnologies and services that we would have to match in order to remainmaintain or increase our competitive position, which could result in significant development costs for us.  costs.

In addition, weWe perform a substantial portion of our business under contracts, often of a long-term nature, with governmentalpublic authorities and clients from the industrial and commercial sectors.service sector customers. These contracts are often awarded through competitive bidding, at the end of which we may not be retained even though we may have incurred significant expenses in order to prepare the bid.

OverIn connection with the courseperformance of performing certain contracts, we may also be requested by our public or private clientscustomers to modify the contractual terms and conditions, regardless of these contracts, whether called for undersuch modifications are contemplated in the contract or not.contract. These modifications may alter the services provided under the contract, related expensesrequired investments or billing terms.

Finally, our contracts may not be renewed at the end of their term, which in the case of importantmajor contracts may obligerequire us to engage in aimplement costly reorganization or restructuring of assets and operations covered by the contract whenmeasures. When the contract does not provide for the transfer of the related assets and employees to the succeeding operator and/or adequate indemnificationappropriate compensation to cover our costs of termination.termination, the impact on our results could be substantial.

Our business operations in some countries may be subject to additional risks.

While our operations are concentrated mainly in Europe and North America,the United States (sales generated outside of these regions represented approximately 16.2% of total Group revenue in 2009), we conduct business in markets around the world. Sales generated in countries outside of Europe and North America represented approximately 10.14% of our total revenue in 2006. The risks associated with conducting business in some countries, in particular outside of Europe, the United States and Canada, can include the non-payment or slower payment of invoices, which is sometimes aggravated by the absence of legal recourse for non-payment, nationalization, social,employee-related risks, political and economic instability, increased currencyforeign exchange risk and currency repatriation restrictions, among other risks.restrictions. We may not be able to insure or hedge against these risks. Furthermore, we may not be able to obtain sufficient financing for our operations in these countries. The establishmentsetting of public utility fees and their structure canmay depend on political decisionsdecisi ons that maycan impede for several years any increase in fees, such that they no longer allow coverage ofcover service costs and appropriate compensation for a private operator. The occurrence of unfavorable

Unfavorable events or circumstances in certain countries may lead us to record exceptional provisions, write-downs and/or depreciation charges in connection with our operations in these countries,impairments, which could have a material adverse effect on our results.

Changes in the prices of fuel and other commodities may reduce our profits.

The pricesSome of our suppliesactivities could cause damage to persons or property

Some of fuelour activities could cause damage to persons (including injury or death), business disruption, and other commodities,damage to real or personal property. It is our general policy to contractually limit our liability and to take out insurance policies that cover our main accidental and operational risks. However, these precautions may prove to be insufficient, and this could generate significant costs for us. For more information, please refer to the risk factors describing environmental, health and safety compliance, below.



5



Back to Contents


We have conducted and may continue to conduct acquisitions, which could have a less favorable impact on our activities and results than anticipated, or which could affect our financial condition.

As part of our external growth strategy, we have conducted and continue to carry out acquisitions of varying sizes, some of which are significant operating expenses forat the Group level. These acquisitions involve numerous risks, including the following: (i) the assumptions underlying the business plans supporting the valuations may prove inaccurate, in particular with respect to synergies and expected commercial demand; (ii) we may fail to successfully integrate the companies acquired and their technologies, products and personnel; (iii) we may fail to retain key employees, customers and suppliers of the companies acquired; (iv) we may be required or wish to terminate pre-existing contractual relationships, which could prove costly and/or be performed at unfavorable terms and conditions; and (v) we may increase our indebtedness to finance these acquisitions. As a result, the expected benefits of comple ted or future acquisitions may not materialize within the time periods or to the extent anticipated, or may impact our financial condition.

Our business is affected by variations in weather conditions.

Certain of our businesses are subject to marked fluctuations. Although mostseasonal variations. For example, Dalkia generates the bulk of its operating results in the first and fourth quarters of the year, corresponding to periods in which heating is used in Europe, while in the water sector, household water consumption tends to be highest between May and September in the northern hemisphere. Accordingly, these two businesses may be affected by significant deviations from seasonal weather patterns. This risk is offset in certain cases, first by the variable compensation terms included in contracts, and second by the geographical coverage of our contracts contain tariff adjustment provisions that are intendedbusinesses. The impact of weather conditions, together with the seasonal nature of the Group’s businesses, may nonetheless affect our results of operations.

Our business is subject to reflect possible variations in pricesCO2 market and emission allowance risks.

As an operator of energy installations and, to a lesser extent, as a result of our supplies usingtransportation and landfill site businesses, we are exposed to the inherent risks of the CO2 allowance system introduced by the European Union and the Kyoto Protocol. The rise in greenhouse gases in the atmosphere led certain pricing formulas,States and the international community to introduce regulatory provisions to limit further increases. At the international level, the Kyoto Protocol came into force in February 2005. Directive 2003/87/EC of October 13, 2003 implementing the Kyoto Protocol, created an emission allowance trading system within the European Union, known as ETS (Emission Trading Scheme). The resulting system, which was set up in 2005, led to the creation of National Allowance Allocation Plans (NAAP).

In France, NAAP 1 was adopted for the period 2005-2007 and was followed by NAAP 2 covering the period 2008-2012. In 2006, the European Union launched a review of directive 2003/87/EC aimed at extending its application scope, strengthening controls and introducing an allowance trading scheme linked with the Kyoto protocol. At the beginning of 2008, the European Commission published a revised draft directive on the CO2 emissions allowance scheme for the period 2013-2020. This led to the adoption by the European parliament, at the end of 2008, of a “climate-energy” package which seeks to ensure compliance within the European Union with climate objectives by 2020: 20% cut in greenhouse gas emissions, 20% improvement in energy efficiency and 20% energy consumption in the European Union produced from renewable sources. This “climate-energy package” includes six new texts: a directive on renewable energies, a directive on the emission trading scheme (ETS), an effort-sharing decision on greenhouse gas emissions (outside ETS), a directive on the capture and storage of CO2, a directive on fuel quality and a directive on reducing CO2 emissions by cars.

The risk we face firstly relates to our ability to achieve the emission reductions imposed by the system over a number of years. As such, as price index formulas, theremajor and costly investment may be developmentsnecessary in order to bring our installations into line with allocated allowances. Secondly, our ability to draw value from positions adopted in the management of the corresponding installations represents a separate risk, given the high volatility in allowance prices. While we have adopted an active approach to managing carbon emissions and allocated allowances by implementing appropriate structures and setting up an entity dedicated to the purchase, sale and pricing of the various types of greenhouse gas credits, the potential overrun by us of allocated emission allowances and the resulting purchase of additional allowances could generate significant additional costs compared with those we anticipate.

Finally, in 2009, the European Commission clarified the conditions governing the national grant of allowances for phase 3, commencing January 1, 2013. A portion of the allowances (based on the nature of the installation) required by the Group and its subsidiary Dalkia in particular, will have to be obtained through an auction system that could prevent us from being fully protected against such increases, such as delays between fuel price increaseslead to a substantial additional cost. Whether this cost can be passed on to customers and the time we are allowedin what amount, have not yet been determined.



6



Back to raise our prices to cover the additional costs, or our failure to update an outdated cost structure formula.  In addition, a sustained increase in supply costs beyond the price levels provided for under our adjustment clauses could reduce our profitability to the extent that we are not able to increase our prices sufficiently to cover the additional costs.Contents


Our business operations are subject to geopolitical, criminal and terrorist risks.

Water is a strategic resource in terms ofthat contributes to public health. Accordingly, our activities must comply with laws and regulations that seek to safeguard water resources, production sites and treatment facilities against criminal or terrorist acts. Our activities inIn the areas of waste management, energy services and public transportation are also subject to similar risks.  Weour installations and vehicles may also havebecome terrorist targets around the world. In addition, our employees who work orand travel in areascountries where the risk of criminal acts, kidnapping or terrorism is either temporarily or permanently elevated.high. As a result, despite the preventive and safety measures that we have attempted to implement, any one of our activities may fall victim toimplemented by us and the insurance policies subscribed, a criminal or terrorist acts in the future.  If an attack were to occur, it could negatively affect our image and have a material adverse effect on ourreputation or operating results.




Back to contents



We have pursued and may continue to pursue strategic acquisitions, which may have a less favorable impact than expected on our activities or affect our financial condition.

As part of our business strategy, we have conducted and continue to conduct acquisitions of varying sizes, some of which are significant at the Group level.  These acquisitions involve numerous risks, including the following: (i) the assumptions used in the underlying business plans may not prove to be accurate, in particular with respect to synergies and expected commercial demand; (ii) we may not integrate acquired businesses, technologies, products, personnel and operations effectively; (iii) we may fail to retain key employees, customers and suppliers of the companies acquired; (iv) we may have or wish to terminate pre-existing contractual relationships, which could be costly and/or on unfavorable terms; and (v) we may raise additional debt to finance these acquisitions.

As a result, it is possible that the contemplated benefits of completed or future acquisitions may not materialize within the time periods or to the extent anticipated or that such acquisitions may affect our financial condition.

Our long-term contracts may limit our capacity to quickly and effectively react to unfavorable general economic changes.

The initial circumstances or conditions under which we enter into a contract may change over time, which may result in adverse economic consequences. Such changes vary in nature and foreseeability. Certain contractual mechanisms may help to address thein addressing such changes and restorerestoring the initial balance of the contract.  Theircontract, but they may not be fully effective. The implementation of such mechanisms may be triggered more or less automatically by the occurrence of a given event (price adjustment clauses for instance)(for instance, price indexing clauses), or they may requirecall for a procedure or revise or amend the contract revision or amendment procedure requiringwith the agreement of both parties or of a third party. Accordingly, we may not be free to adapt our compensation, whether this consists of a price paid by the customer or a fee levied on end users based on an agreed-upon scale, in line with changes in our costs and demand. These constraints on us are exacerbated by th e long-term nature of contracts. In any case, however,all cases and most particularly with regard to public service management contracts, our actions must remain within the scope of the contract and weensure continuity of service. We cannot terminate unilaterally and suddenly a business that we believe to beis unprofitable, or change its features.  Our compensation, whether it consistsfeatures, except, under certain circumstances, in the event of a price paidproven misconduct by the client customer.

Certain of our construction operations are performed under fixed-price contracts, containing performance cost and/or a fee levied from end users based on an agreed-up on schedule,completion date commitments.

Through Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies, we perform “turnkey” contracts for the design and construction of infrastructure in the water sector, compensated at non-revisable fixed prices. The risks to which we are exposed under this type of contract are generally technical (design and choice of tailored and tried-and-tested technology), operational (site management during the performance, acceptance and warranty phases) and economic (fluctuations in raw material prices or foreign exchange rates).

In accordance with standard contractual practice, to the extent possible we seek to place these risks contractually with the customer. We may, not be changed at any time in line withhowever, encounter difficulties over which we have no control, relating, for example, to the complexity of certain infrastructure or construction contingencies, the purchase and ordering of equipment and supplies, or changes in ourperformance schedules. These may lead to non-compliance with contract specifications or generate additional costs and demand.  These constraints have an impact onconstruction delays, triggering, in certain cases, reductions in our behaviorrevenue or contractual penalties.

In certain cases, we must take into consideration customer requests for additional work or integrate existing information or studies provided by the customer that may prove inaccurate or inconsistent, or we may be required to use existing infrastructure with poorly-defined operating characteristics.

While contracts generally include clauses providing for the payment of compensation, should events such as an economic agent, andthose detailed above occur, we are particularly meaningful because our contracts are often entered into for long periodsexposed to the risk of not obtaining amounts sufficient to cover the resulting additional costs, or of obtaining such amounts only after the passage of time.

The rights of governmental authorities to terminate or modify our contracts unilaterally could have a negative impact on our revenue and profits.

Contracts with governmentalpublic authorities make up a significant percentage of our revenue. In numerous countries, including France, governmentalpublic authorities may modifyunilaterally amend or terminate contracts under certain circumstances, but generally with indemnification.  In some countries, however,circumstances. While we often are entitled to compensation, this may not be true in all cases, and even when compensation is due, we may not be entitled to or be able to obtain full indemnification in the event our contracts areor timely compensation should a contract be unilaterally terminated by governmental counterparties.  the relevant public authority.



7



Back to Contents


We may make significant investments in projects without being able to obtain the required approvals for the project.

To engage in business, we must in most cases obtainwe must sign a contract and sometimes obtain, or renew, various permits and authorizations from regulatory authorities. The competition and/or negotiation process that must be followed in order to obtain such contracts is often long, costly, complex and hard to predict. The same applies to the authorization process for activities that may harm the environment, which are often preceded by increasingly complex studies and public investigations. We may invest significant resources in a project or public tender without obtaining the right to engage in the desired business or sufficient compensation or indemnities to cover the cost of our investments, for instance as a result of ainvestment. This could arise due to failure to obtain necessary permits or authorizations, or approvalsapproval from antitrust authorities, or because authorizations are subject to conditions that force us to abandongranted contingent on our abandoning certain of our developmen tdev elopment projects. These situations increaseThis result increases the overall cost of our activities and if we do not obtaincould potentially, were the desired business or are forcedcost of failure to withdraw from a public tender,become too high, force us to abandon certain projects. Should such situations become more frequent, the scope and profitability of our business may not grow as much or as profitably as we hope.could be affected.

We must comply with various environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, which is costly and may, in the event of any failure to comply on our part, cause us to incur liability under these laws and regulations.

We incur significant costs of compliance with various environmental, health and safety laws and regulations.

We have madeincurred and will continue to makeincur significant capitalcosts and other expenditures to comply with our environmental, health and safety obligations as well as to ensure sanitary protectionmanage the sanitary-related aspects of the services we provide. We are continuously required to incur expenditures to ensure that the installations that we operate comply with applicable legal, regulatory and administrative requirements, including generalspecific precautionary orand preventative measures, or to advise our clientscustomers so that they undertake themselves the necessary actions for the compliance of their installations. The costs related to these preventative measures are recorded as either operating expenses or as industrial investments. Our industrial investments totaled €2.197 billion in 2006.




Back to contents



work.

Each of our operations,businesses, moreover, may become subject to stricter general or specific laws and regulations, and correspondingly incur greater compliance expenditures in the future. If we are unable to recover these expenditures through higher tariffs,prices, this could adversely affect our operations and profitability. Moreover, the scope of application of environmental, health, safety and other laws and regulations is becoming increasingly broad.increasing constantly. These laws and regulations now govern any dischargeall discharges in a natural environment, the collection, transport, treatmenttransportation and disposal of all types of waste, the rehabilitation of old sites at the end of operations, as well as ongoing operations at new or oldexisting facilities.

Our operations and activities may cause damages or lead us to incur liability or other damages that we might be required to compensate.compensate or repair.

The increasingly broad laws and regulations expose us to the riskgreater risks of liability, in particular environmental liability, including in connection with assets that we no longer own and activities that have been discontinued. For example, the European directive of April 21, 2004 on environmental liability introduces throughout the European Union a framework of environmental liability, for serious environmental damage or threat of damage. This directive was enacted into French law dated July 30, 2003, relatingon August 1, 2008 and extends the scope of strict liability for certain serious environmental damage. With regard to the prevention of technological and environmental risks and the conduct of remediation activities, has strengthened the regulatory framework that appliesFrench law of July 30, 2003 strengthens obligations to discontinued operations and closedrestore certain sites and installations.at the end of their operating life, making the accrual of provisions mandatory under certain conditions. In some instances, reserves must be established in respect of such discontinued operations. In addition,addit ion, we may be required to pay fines, repair damage or undertake improvement works,work, even when we have conducted our activities with all due care and in total conformityfull compliance with operating permits. Regulatory authorities may also require us to conduct specific investigations and undertake remedial activities, curtailsite restoration work for current or future operations or close facilities temporarilyto suspend activities as a result, in connection with applicab le laws and regulations, including to preventparticular, of an imminent risksthreat of damage or a change in light of expected changes in those laws and regulations.applicable standards.

In addition, we often operate installations that do not belong to us, and therefore do not always have the power to make the investment decisions required to bring these installations into compliance with new regulatory norms. In instances wherecompliance. Where the clientcustomer on whose behalf these installations are operated refuses to make the required investments, we may be forced to terminate our operations.

In the event of an accidentDespite this restrictive trend towards increasing regulation and constant efforts to improve risk prevention, accidents or other incident,incidents may still occur and we could also becomebe the subject of legal action to claims for personal injury,compensate damage caused to individuals, property damage or damage to the environment (including natural resources)the ecosystem). TheseIn such instances, these potential liabilities may not always be covered by insurance programs, or may be only partially covered. The obligation to take certain measures or compensate for such damagesdamage might have a material adverse effect on our activities, our resources, or resources.our profitability. Accordingly, the Group focuses considerable attention on controlling health risks, whether relating to the operation of its installations or resulting from environmental pollution which conventional treatment methods cannot fully correct. In particular, this may concern the development of air- or water-borne bacteri a, which are increasingly well identified, or the exposure of individuals (Company employees or third parties) to chemical and/or dangerous products or substances.



8



Back to Contents


Specific measures are required in connection with certain technological risks (article L. 225-102-2risks.

Our subsidiaries in France or abroad may, under environmental services outsourcing contracts, perform activities at certain environmentally sensitive sites known as high threshold “Seveso” sites (classified “AS” under the French ICPE, “Installations Classified for the Protection of the French Commercial Code regarding “Seveso” facilities).

Among the facilities that we own and operate in France, one has been categorized a “Seveso” facility.  “Seveso” facilities are places where dangerous substances are present in quantities equal toEnvironment” system) or above thresholds specified in European Union Directive 96/82/EC (also known as the Seveso II Directive), relating to the control of major accident hazards involving dangerous substances.  As such, these facilities are the subject of special concern and heightened regulation. Our “Seveso” facility is a hazardous waste incineration factory at Limay (Yvelines). The manipulation of waste and hazardous products in this facility can, in the case of an accident, cause serious damage to the environment, neighbors or employees, exposing us to potentially substantial liabilities.

As part of our outsourcing contracts, our subsidiaries may also be involved in the operation oflow threshold Seveso sites (or the foreign equivalent), operated by industrial clientscustomers (particularly petroleum or chemical industry sites). In these instances, we must handlemanage the provision of services with even greater care, given the more dangerous nature of the products, waste, effluents and emissions to be treated, as well as the close proximity of the installations we managemanaged by us to clientcustomer sites.

Finally, while the The regulatory regime governing Seveso facilities applies only within the European Union, but we operate several similar sites outside of this region whicht hat are often subject to the same level of heightened regulationstringent regulation.

In France, the Group operates installations with characteristics similar to those covered by foreign governments.the Seveso regime (only certain of which are classified as “AS” under the ICPE system). We have decided to apply all or part of the Seveso regime at certain of these sites, such as at the hazardous waste incineration facility operated by SARP Industries (Veolia Environmental Services) in Limay in the Yvelines. As a result, we are subject to the same care standards and bear the associated costs as at sites that are covered by the Seveso regime.

Currency exchange and interest rate fluctuations may negatively affect our financial results and the price of our shares.

We hold assets, earn income and incur expenses and liabilities in a variety of currencies. Our financial statements are presented in euro. Therefore,euros. Accordingly, when we prepare our financial statements, we must translate our foreign currency-denominated assets, liabilities, income and expenses in other currenciesexpense items into euroeuros at then-applicableapplicable exchange rates. Consequently, increases and decreasesfluctuations in the valueexchange rate of the euro in respect ofagainst these other currencies can affect the value of these items in ourthe financial statements, even if their intrinsic value has not changedis unchanged in theirthe original currency. For example, an increase in the value of the euro may result in a declinedecrease in the reported value, in euro,euros, of our interestsinvestments held in foreign currencies.

AtWe are also subject to risks related to fluctuations in interest rates. As of December 31, 2006,2009, approximately 48.7% of our netoutstanding financial debt excluding revaluation ofbore interest at floating rates, after taking into account hedging instruments amounted(see Note 29.1.1 to €14.7 billion, of which 25.7% was subject to variable rates and 74.3% to fixed interest rates, including 12.1% subject to variable rates with caps. Our results of operations andour consolidated financial condition may be affected by changes in prevailing market rates of interest.statements). Fluctuations in interest rates may also affect our future growth and investment strategy since a rise in interest rates may force usVeolia Environnement to finance acquisitions or investments or refinance existing debt at a higher cost in the future.

Changes in the prices of energy and other commodities or in the price of recycled materials may reduce our profits

The prices of our energy and other commodity supplies are subject to significant fluctuations and represent major operating expenses in our businesses. Although most of our contracts include tariff adjustment provisions that are intended to pass on any changes in the price of supplies, often using price indexing formulas, certain events may prevent us from being fully protected against such increases, such as time lags between fuel price increases and the date when we are authorized to increase prices to cover the additional costs, or a mismatch between the price-increase formula and the cost structure (including taxes). A sustained increase in supply costs and/or related taxes could undermine our operations by increasing costs and reducing profitability, to the extent that we are unable to increase our prices sufficiently to cover such additional costs.

In addition, a substantial portion of our Environmental Services Division’s revenue is generated by its sorting-recycling and trading businesses, which are particularly sensitive to fluctuations in the price of recycled raw materials (paper and ferrous and non-ferrous metal). A significant and long-term drop in the price of recycled raw materials, combined with the impact of the current economic crisis on volumes, has affected and could continue to affect our operating results.

Changes in certain cogeneration contracts may affect our business

We are exposed to risks associated with fluctuations in electricity prices, primarily through Dalkia, which is a power producer with approximately 7,151 MW of installed power capacity. While a majority of the production installations are operated under purchasing regimes that insulate us from electricity market risks, we have direct market exposure with respect to production in the United Kingdom and Italy (73 MW installed capacity), as well as exposure to local market fluctuations with respect to approximately 2,000 MW of installed capacity, principally in the United States and Central and Eastern Europe. In addition, purchase commitments in France with respect to a total of approximately 736 MW of installed capacity are scheduled to expire between January 2011 and November 2013, increasing our potential risk. While we intend to manage this risk through the use of contracts with co unterparties active in these markets, we cannot assure you that these methods will be effective to protect us from these risks.



9



Back to Contents


Risks Relating to Our Shares and ADSs

Because preemptive rights may not be available for U.S. persons, the ownership percentages of our U.S. shareholders may be diluted in the event of a capital increase of our company.Company.

Under French law, shareholders have preemptive rights (droits préférentiels de souscription) to subscribe, on a pro rata basis, for cash issuances of new shares or other securities giving rights to acquire additional shares. U.S. holders of our shares may not be able to exercise preemptive rights for our shares unless a registration statement under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Securities Act”), is effective with respect to those rights or an exemption from the registration requirements imposed byof the Securities Act is available. We are not required to file registration statements in connection with issues of new shares or other securities giving rights to acquire shares to our shareholders. As a result, we may from time to time issue new shares or other securities giving rights to acquire additional shares at a time when no registration statement is i nin effect. For example, in June 2007If we launched aundertake future unregistered capital increase through the issuance of rights to acquire new shares to all of our shareholders, but those rights were generally exercisable only by persons located




Back to contents



outside the United States.  Holdersincreases, holders of our ADSs wereand U.S. holders of our shares may be subject to dilution, which may not permitted to exercisebe fully compensated by the rights corresponding toproceeds from the shares underlying the ADSs.sale of rights.

We are permitted to file less information with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) than a company incorporated in the United States.

As a “foreign private issuer,” we are exempt from rules under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), that impose some disclosure and procedural requirements for proxy solicitations under Section 14 of the Exchange Act. Additionally, our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and “short-swing” profit recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and related rules with respect to their purchases and sales of our shares. Moreover, we are not required to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as U.S. companies with securities registered under the Exchange Act. Accordingly, there may be less information concerning our companyCompany publicly available from time to time than there is for U.S. companies at those times.

The ability of holders of our ADSs to influence the governance of our companyCompany may be limited.

Holders of our ADSs may not have the same ability to influence corporate governance with respect to our companyCompany as would shareholders in some U.S. companies. For example, the ADS depositary may not receive voting materials in time to ensure that holders of our ADSs can instruct the depositary to vote their shares. In addition, the depositary’s liability to holders of our ADSs for failing to carry out voting instructions or for the manner of carrying out voting instructions is limited by the deposit agreement. Finally, except under limited circumstances, our shareholders do not have the power to call shareholders’ meetings.



10



Back to contentsContents



ITEM 4.

INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY

We are a leading global provider of environmental management services, which include water and wastewater services, waste managementenvironmental services, energy services (excluding the production, trading and sale of electricity, other than production through co-generation) and transportation services. Our clients include a wide range of public authorities, industrial and commercial services customers and individuals around the world.

The legal and commercial name of our companyCompany is “Veolia Environnement.” Our companyCompany is asociété anonyme,, a form of stock corporation, incorporated in 1995 pursuant to the French commercial code for a term of 99 years. Our registered office is located at 36/38, avenue Kléber, 75116 Paris, France, and the phone number of that office is (+33 1) 71 75 00 00. Our agent in the United States is Brian Sullivan.J. Clarke. He can be reached at Veolia Environnement, 700 East Butterfield Road,Water America LLC, 200 E. Randolph St., Suite 201, Lombard,7900, Chicago, IL 60148.60601.

Our operations are conducted through four Divisions, each specializing in a single business sector: Water, Environmental Services, Energy Services and Transportation. Our principal operating subsidiaries in each Division are Veolia Eau – Compagnie Générale des Eaux (Water), Veolia Propreté (Environmental Services), Dalkia (Energy Services) and Veolia Transport (Transportation). When referring to the activities of our Divisions, we refer to the division names, and when referring to entities within the Group, we refer to their legal names.

Historical Background

Our companyCompany traces its roots back to the creation of Compagnie Générale des Eaux by Imperial decreeDecree on December 14, 1853. During the same year, Compagnie Générale des Eaux won its first public service concession for the distribution of water in the city of Lyon, France. Early on, it commenced developingOur Company developed its municipal water distribution activities in France by obtaining concessions in Nantes (1854), Nice (1864), as well as a 50-year concession for Paris (1860) and its suburbs (1869).

In 1980, Compagnie Générale des Eaux reorganized its water activities by regroupingbringing together all of its design, engineering and executionoperating activities relating to drinking water and wastewater treatment facilities underwithin its subsidiary Omnium de Traitement et de Valorisation (OTV). At the same time, Compagnie Générale des Eaux expanded its business during the 1980s with the acquisition of Compagnie Générale d’Entreprises Automobiles (CGEA, which would become Connex and Onyx, and later Veolia Transport and Veolia Propreté) and Compagnie Générale de Chauffe and Esys-Montenay (which would merge to become Dalkia). It also began significant international expansion.

In 1998, Compagnie Générale des Eaux changed its name to “Vivendi” and renamed its main water subsidiary “Compagnie Générale des Eaux.”Eaux”.

In April 1999, in order to better distinguish the separate existence of its two main businesses, communications and environmental services, Vivendi created our companyCompany under the name “Vivendi Environnement” to conduct all of its environmental management activities, which were then conducted under the names VivendiVeolia Water (water)(Water), Onyx (waste management)(Environmental Services), Dalkia (energy services)(Energy Services) and Connex (transportation)(Transportation).

On July 20, 2000, ourVivendi Environnement shares were listed on the Premier Marché of Euronext Paris, which became the Eurolist of Euronext Paris on February 21, 2005.2005 and Euronext Paris on January 1, 2008.

In August 2001, ourVivendi Environnement shares were included in the CAC 40, the main equity index published by Euronext, Paris, and in October 2001 were listed in the form of American Depositary Shares for tradingReceipts on Thethe New York Stock Exchange.

From 2002 to 2004, Vivendi (formerly known as Vivendi Universal)Universal progressively decreased its stake in our company,Company through successive disposals and hasdilution and held only 5.3% of our shares sinceby December 2004. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Major Shareholders.”  Since July 26,6, 2006, Vivendi no longer holds any shares in our company.Company.

In April 2003, we changed our name to “Veolia Environnement.”

Between 2002 and 2004, we began conductingundertook a significantmajor restructuring in order to refocus on our core environmental servicesEnvironmental Services activities. This restructuringprocess was completed in 2004 with the sale of various U.S. subsidiaries within our water division conducting certain non-core activities,in the Water Division and with the sale of our indirect interest in Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas (FCC), a Spanish company whose activities include construction and cement services, as well as other services related to the environment.activities.

In April 2003, we changed our name to “Veolia Environnement.”  On November 3, 2005, we unveiled a new branding system for our group. Our water, waste management and transportation divisions currently operate under the same name: “Veolia.”

11





Back to contentsContents



Major Developments in 2006  

Below we discuss the main developments in our business during 2006.  The discussion below and in the remainder of Item 4 includes the revenue amounts that we expect to earn from various contracts (most of which are long-term contracts), including total revenue expected to be generated from all services under combined contracts to build and operate facilities.  These revenue amounts take into account updates to our volume and price assumptions since the date these contracts were publicly announced.  In addition, revenue amounts expected under foreign contracts won during 2006 have been converted into euro at the rate of exchange prevailing on December 31, 2006.  As a result, publicly announced revenue amounts may differ from the amounts of expected revenue included in this document.  In addition, these expected revenue amounts constitute forward-looking statements that involve risks and u ncertainties, including, but not limited to, those described under “Item 3. Key Information–Risk Factors.”  Actual revenue amounts may differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements.  See “Forward-Looking Statements” at the beginning of this document for a more detailed discussion of the risks and uncertainties to which our forward-looking statements are subject.

Deployment of the “Veolia” Brand

SinceNovember 2005, we have been rollingrolled out a new branding program. Todaybrand system aimed at increasing consistency between our water, waste managementDivisions and transportation divisions have been brought togetherour visibility by strengthening the identity and common culture of Veolia Environnement around our service values. Our Water, Environmental Services and Transportation Divisions are now united under a single name: “Veolia.” The energy services division continuesbrand, “Veolia”, which is linked to operatethe name of their activity. Our Energy Services Division primarily operates under the brand name “Dalkia.”

In connection with the roll-out of the “Veolia” brand, the holding companies of water, waste management and transportation divisions, as well as most of our operating companies, have changed their names to include “Veolia”“Dalkia”.

The brand roll-out, which was initiated by the executive committee, illustrates our determination to unite our divisions and heighten our public profile. This change also aims to reinforce our corporate identity and culture, as well as to strengthen the commitment of our employees to our strong service-oriented values. Over time, the Veolia brand is expected to become a benchmark worldwide for trust, reliability and expertise in environmental solutions.

At the same time, a publicity campaign was launched in June 2006 (written press, public displays, television). This campaign asserts Veolia’s industrial commitment to reconciling human activities and environmental preservation, a commitment that is expressed in the slogan “the environment is an industrial challenge.”


This campaign was launched in the written press in France, the United Kingdom, Germany, the Czech Republic and Romania, and through public displays in airports across the world (Paris, London, Shanghai, Hong Kong, New York, Chicago and Los Angeles) and in the Eurostar station in Brussels.


It was completed by an adverstising film focusing on the human and urban aspects of our activities, which was broadcast from October 2006 through various hertzian and cable channels in France and Europe.


Costs borne by us in 2006 for the development of the brand and the publicity campaign amounted to approximately €26 million.


Acquisition of Cleanaway UK


In 2006, we improved our market position by carrying out targeted acquisitions, designed to generate growth and costs synergies.


On June 30, 2006, one of our divisions, Veolia Propreté, a division of Veolia Environnement, announced the acquisition of Cleanaway Holdings Limited (Cleanaway UK) from the Brambles group for €744.7 million. This acquisition significantly reinforced our position in the British industrial and local waste management sector. With estimated annual consolidated revenues of €684 million, Cleanaway UK is a major operator in the United Kingdom within the industrial and municipal waste collection services sector, and the waste management sector. The transaction, which was submitted for approval by the European competition authorities, was finalized on September 28, 2006.  


Agreements Relating to the Société Nationale de Maritime Corse Méditerranée (SNCM)


On May 31, 2006, we signed agreements with Butler Capital Partners and the CGMF relating to the acquisition of the Société Nationale de Maritime Corse Méditerranée (SNCM).  These agreements were part of a transaction to open SNCM’s capital to outside investment, a decision made by the French government at the beginning of 2005, and the restructuring of the company.  The transaction is still subject to a cancellation clause relating to the European Commission’s agreement on state aid.  As a result of this acquisition, we hold 28.29% of SNCM’s share capital.





Back to contents



SNCM’s principal business is the operation of a public service concession for transportation to Corsica from the port of Marseille.  It has ten ships at its disposal and contributed approximately €200 million to Veolia Transport’s revenues in 2006.  As a result of this transaction, Veolia Transport has significantly reinforced its position as an operator of maritime lines in high growth markets, after many years as an operator in Northern Europe.

Validation of a Strong Business Model

Since our initial public offering, we have gone through a series of stages in establishing our business model and independence, which in 2004 culminated in the sale of non-strategic assets in the U.S. as well as the sale of our interest in FCC.  Our refocusing of our activities on services related to the environment should enable us to strengthen our position as a leader in this market going forward, by relying on the same consistent strategy for growth.

 “Veolia Skills” Program

In September 2005, we engaged in a large and innovative recruiting campaign in France referred to as “Veolia Skills.” This campaign allowed for the the recruitment of 4,879 new employees in 2006.  The objective for the third campaign is to recruit 8,000 new employees in 2007.

All of these recruitments will be professional skills-oriented.  Training will last between 9 and 24 months, leading to a diploma recognized by the French Education Ministry.  Once a diploma has been obtained, candidates will be offered indefinite-term employment.

This recruiting campaign is open to persons of all ages. It is also open to existing employees, in order to afford them greater mobility in the spirit of ongoing skills development. Through this campaign, we hope to encourage the hiring of members of certain sectors of the public, including handicapped persons, seniors and the long term unemployed.


In the long term, the goal is to make mobility our preferred means of recruitment.  Internally, the expected increase in staff must be accompanied by the strengthening of mobility, focusing on the professionalism of partners, the true actors in our development.


“Veolia Environnement 2006” Efficiency Plan

We announced in September 2003 the plan called “Veolia Environnement 2005,” which we hoped would generate €300 million in annual savings beginning in 2006. This objective was achieved one year in advance, with €304 million in savings recorded in 2005.  This plan continued in 2006 and generated €406 million in savings excluding exceptional and non-recurring costs relating to its implementation. This program which ended at the end of this fiscal year will have mobilized all of our operational units and more than 1,000 contributors. More than 700 projects were carried out across all themes (operational, optimization of structures, purchasing and staff). In 2007 and for the following years, our objective is to capitalize on the gains from the plan to achieve continuous improvement of an ongoing transversal performance program.  

Greenhouse Gases

An increase of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere has led certain countries, as well as the international community, to implement regulatory measures in order to limit their progression.  At the international level, the Kyoto Protocol, which came into force in February 2005, as well as the European directive of October 13, 2003 has created a European Union for gas emissions, the “Emission Trading Scheme”.

The system was put in place on a European level in parallel to that of the Kyoto Protocol, which was started in 2005 and which led to the creation of the national allocation quota plan (PNAQ). In 2006, a revision of the October 13, 2003 directive was launched in order to increase its jurisdiction, to reinforce the controls and to establish a commercial quota system linked to the Kyoto Protocol.


We are already active in this field on a national, European, and global level.

·

At the European Union level, Dalkia, which operates close to 250 combustion installations in Europe that are affected by the new quota system, has been awarded quotas representing approximately 1% of all European quotas awarded, and has taken an active role in working with clients to manage carbon emissions and quotas.


·

At the international level, we have begun trying to generate emissions credits that are tradable on the market, by participating in projects with other countries that help to reduce greenhouse gases. Veolia Propreté and Dalkia completed two projects, which were registered as clean development facilities (“mécanisme de développement propre", or MDP) by the MDP Executive Council, while six others are in the process of being completed. Dalkia completed a project of joint development (“Mise en Oeuvre Conjointe”, or MOC). Veolia Transport is actively involved in developing an initial tool that would apply to business transportation, in collaboration with EpE and ADEME.




Back to contents




BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Our Market

The market for environmentalEnvironmental management services, has emerged only recently, includingcomprising drinking water treatment and distribution, wastewater treatment and collection, waste treatment and management, energy services (excluding the production, trading and sale of electricity, other than production through co-generation)electricity) and transportation. Traditionally,transportation are now recognized as a separate business sector. Private customers view these services were,as similar and seek the expertise of a service provider able to supply a comprehensive service. Public sector customers are also aware of the benefits of grouping together these services, however, such customers are often remain, considered as independentconstrained to contract separately for these services outsourceddue to individual providers.  Public authoritiesadministrative and industrialbudgetary structures or regulatory restrictions regarding contract awards. The need to take action to prevent further damage to the environment has, nonetheless, become a global reality. There is a growing need for excellence and commercial companies, moreover, typically met many of their own environmental needs without lookingefficiency, which has led decision-m akers to private firms that specialize in these areas. This situation has changed fundamentally in recent years.  Recent awareness regarding environmental demands and the necessity ofseek a global approach to the management of activities having an environmental impact as well ason the updating ofenvironment with a view to developing solutions allowingthat allow interaction between and optimization betweenof these services, has prompted aenvironmental management services. These measures, now widely accepted, have led to an increased demand for integrated environmental management services. This phenomenontrend has been emphasized byincreased with the continued global expansion of industrial and commercial companies, that havewhich has generated a need for environmental management servicesservice providers with a global reach.who are able to respond to their customers’ needs on an international scale.

We believe that the demand for integrated, customized packages ofexternal and global environmental management services is likely to grow around the world for the following reasons:

·

Faced with increasingly strict environmental standards, public and private parties do not always have the necessary technical or operational resources that specialist private operators can mobilize to deal with environmental problems effectively and on a lower cost basis; they therefore seek the legal security offered by an operator that accepts responsibility for the management of these activities. Expertise in environmental regulations is a determining factor in the choice of operators and an asset that sets us apart from the competition.

In addition, public demand, which now widely reflects a concern for sustainable development, must respect commitments made at the international level and set exemplary standards. In a world that combines accelerated urbanization with demographic growth, major investments in environmental projects and services, as well as effectivesustainable management, are needed in order to meet increasingly stringent environmental standards, provide growing urban populations with adequatetailored environmental services and to replace existingobsolete environmental infrastructure.  In addition, there is also an increase in public demand for high-quality and reliable environmental products and services.infrastructures.


·

Governments throughoutNonetheless, the world face budgetary constraints and often lack the technical and operational skills of private sector firms to address environmental issues efficiently.  As a result,financial difficulties that plague all parties, whether they are public authorities are increasinglyor private companies, could lead to certain decisions being postponed, especially when they involve new investment.

However, these financial constraints could also encourage public authorities and private companies to seek the most cost efficient solutions and lead them to consider outsourcing part of their activities, or turning to the private sectora specialist service provider able to address their environmental needs.


·

Public and private entities are increasingly attemptingset up a structure satisfying these requirements. They often seek to simplify the administrationcontractual process by entrusting the performance of their complex operations by outsourcing a wide variety of responsibilitieshighly varied services to a single partner.partner, who is able to provide performance commitments. This tendency createsoffers numerous opportunities to companies who are able to propose a business opportunity for companies capable of offering a broadwide range of integrated environmental management services in an integrated fashion.


·

Large private firmsservices. Increasingly, they expect service offers that reflect their specific requirements, are adaptable, and public authorities increasingly recognize that a “one size fits all” approach will not meethave been tailored to closely match their unique and changing needs. As a result, demand for customized environmental management services has grown.


·

The increasingly multinational profile of many large industrial and commercial firms encourages themexpectations. Finally, they expect the organizational structure to outsource non-core activitiesgenerate productivity gains, to companies with similar geographic reach in order to simplify administration and ensure they receive consistent service at each of their facilities.


be shared by both parties.

We thinkbelieve that each of these trends, taken individually, createsoffers significant opportunities for companies with our expertise, and, taken as a whole, they allow our company, in particular,enable us to provide high quality, innovative, and, depending on customer needs, integrated environmental management services in markets around the world. In order to seize these opportunities, we must, more than ever, strive to offer high-quality services at competitive prices.



12



Back to Contents


Our Clients


Customers

We provide environmental management services to a wide range of public authorities, industrial and commercialservice-sector customers and private individuals around the world.


Public Authorities


Demand byfrom public authorities (often small localitieslocal authorities that are increasingly joining forces together) has beenpooling resources) is influenced and strengthened by trends relating to the search for quality, efficiency, innovation, the rationalization of public procurement and reduced costs, as well ascost reduction (by integrating operating concerns from the design stage), and by a heightened sensitivitycommitment to environmental issues, includingassuming their responsibility for the environment and particularly the management of water resources, air pollution, mass transportation policies and energy consumption. These trends, combined with a movement towards greater urbanization, are increasing the need for essential environmental services.


As a result,We have the know-how to adapt to customer expectations and needs, but we believe that our historical business model—most often takingglobal contract model, which gives us the formability to provide services tied to performance obligations, as well as, depending on customer needs, to design, build and even finance necessary investments, remains as relevant as ever. It contributes to innovation and efficiency through mutual research efforts, stimulated by the periodic competitive tendering of “delegated management contracts” in France and of “concessions” in most places outside of France—is more relevant than ever. Dependingcontracts. This model takes on different legal forms depending on the country,traditions in each country. Certain countries, including those governed by European Union law, distinguish public markets from concessions (or other forms of Public Private Partnership, or PPP) based on whether operating rights are transferred and the actualextent to which we assume operating risks, and depending on whether the contract may take several legal forms, but remains characterized byfocuses on a public authority delegatingservice to private operatorsbe provided or the exclusive right, with or without an investment obligation, to operate services or support facilities, or to manage an activity, for whichconstruction of infrastructure.

In France, since the authority is responsible.  Themiddle of the 19th century, public authorities retain the role of defining, organizing and overseeing the services providedhave generally chosen to inhabitants or other users. At the same time, the private operator charged with the provision of these services uses its expertise to deliver them more efficiently, resulting in a mutually beneficial relationship between the private operator and public authority. Publi c authorities can assume a larger or less prominent role inentrust the management of public services depending on(water, sanitation, transportation, waste collection, urban heating) to companies under contracts that were traditionally considered to be concessions (or operating contracts in the absence of an investment component) and which are now classified by law as public service delegation contracts, but which remain concessions under the European Union definition. They have frequently preferred, at least for certain public services, to retain control over the construction of installations, as well as their needs. We believe that we can adaptfinancing, before making them available to the different needsservice provider for the term of the contract.

In the last few years, a new trend has emerged whereby public authorities in all countries, including France, have asked companies to manage not only the design and expectationsconstruction of the necessary public infrastructure, installations and equipment (as varied as administrative and educational buildings, hospitals, transportation infrastructure, prisons, wastewater treatment facilities or household waste processing plants), but also their financing and long-term maintenance, before recovering them at the end of the contract. Two main categories of these contracts have emerged, although, together, they are often referred to as PPPs. In the first category, which includes contracts belonging to the market category, the resources intended to cover the cost of infrastructure and financing are similar to a price paid or guaranteed by the public authority, and the service is provided to the pu blic authority using the completed infrastructure. In the second category, which includes contracts equivalent to concessions under European Union law, the resources must be obtained through the commercial operation of the public service (i.e. the public or general-interest service whose operation has been delegated), which is the main purpose of the contract, with the construction of infrastructure only providing the necessary means. Different IFRS accounting treatments apply in each case (depending on whether a financial asset corresponding to a receivable from the public authority is recognized or not). It is also possible to distinguish these PPPs based on the nature of the services entrusted, such as “Build Operate Transfer” (BOT) with financing, or “Design, Build, Operate” (DBO), with design but excluding financing.

In France, the public authorities decided to encourage a type of global PPP contract whereby public authorities contract with a private enterprise that undertakes the financing, construction, maintenance and/or operation (or provision of services directly to the end-user) in exchange for periodic installment payments from the public authorities. To this end, the Order of June 17, 2004 created a new category of public authorities aroundworks contract, classified as a “partnership contract” (contrat de partenariat). This reform was introduced to address restrictions arising under prior regulations. In particular, public bodies had previously not been authorized to enter into contracts governed by private law when those contracts delegated both the world in orderconstruction and operating responsibilites to assist them in (i) respondingthe private entitiy; similarly, under the prior French regulations, private law could not gove rn contracts that included project financing, whenever there was no accompanying operating concession or delegation of public interest services paid by users.

At EU level, on November 19, 2009, the European Commission published a major communication recommending the development of Public Private Partnerships (PPP). According to the Commission, this term encompasses all long-term contracts where a private enterprise is charged with construction, operation and financing, irrespective of whether the contract takes the legal form of a concession or a procurement contract. It highlights the economic benefits of PPPs which should respond to the need for heightened efficiencycurrent and productivityfuture investments in the provision of public services in order to control costs, (ii) accessing more sophisticated technical skills in order to resolve complex environmental problems, and (iii) responding to the demand for prompt and professional service expressed by end users.


In France in particular, we intend to take advantage of a Frenchordonnance dated June 17, 2004 allowing for the creation of a new form of partnership contract.  Theordonnance allows public authorities to entrust private operators (who may be associated withservices.



13



Back to contentsContents



financial organizations) with the entire responsibility for building and/or financing an installation and operating the services related thereto, in exchange for compensation that is paid by the public authority as a function of performance.


This model, of delegated management or concessioncharacterized by a contract between the public entity responsible for a service and the company operating this service, whatever its legal form, is widelyfrequently used, for the provision of collective services, but is not the only one.  Publicmodel available. The expansion of its use is often slowed by preconceived ideas entrenched in a country’s history, which require the management of certain services to inhabitants, such as water distribution, to be provided by public entities. We therefore offer our services to these entities. Conversely, public authorities may decide that they should not be directly involved in the provision of certainsome public services, even general interest services. In these instances,such cases, they are oftenusually do not own the owner of facilities or networks, and do not enter into contracts with a preferred private operator;operators; instead, they leave the provision of the public service to market forces. They may nonetheless occasionallythe market. Sometimes, however, they verify the abilitiesc ompetence of private operators by issuing operating licenses and regulating service conditions and prices.prices, although they may limit their intervention to ensuring compliance with general regulations. This situation rarely arises with respect to water services, which are considered essential, but is more common in the fields offor energy services, waste management and transportation. Public authorities may also holddemonstrate their interest in the services rendered by taking an ownership interest in the private operator in these instances; weoperator. We may seek to acquire a stake as well.


in such operators.

Services Sold Directly to Individuals


We also offer household services directly to private individuals through our specialized subsidiaries. These services include assistance with and maintenance relating toof privately-owned water (including meter-reading),installations (located on private property after the water meter) and heating and gas services.


installations.

Industrial or Commercialand Service Sector Companies


We offer our industrial and commercial clientsservice sector customers a largewide range of services, which generally aim to achievecovering two major environmental goals: on the following two main goals in relation toone hand, providing customers with and optimizing consumption of the environment:


·

furnishing clients with the servicesutilities necessary for their industrial processes (steam, industrial heating and cooling, processedprocess water, demineralized water, compressed air, etc.) and, optimizing their consumption thereof, and


·

on the other hand, reducing the impact of their industrial processes on the environment, which may include treating effluents, recycling and recovering waste, and maintaining durable and efficient waste elimination channels.


We often partner with such clients over the long term, and offer customers innovative solutions adaptedtailored to the needs of each industrial site.


We adopt a long-term partnership approach, entering into long-term contracts which allow for variation in services to account for changes in the customer’s needs and business.

We believe that the further development of our industrial clientcustomer base will be a significant area of growth.offers considerable growth potential. In particular, multiservicethe importance of multi-service contracts entered into with industrial clients have assumed an increasingly important role and are expected to continue to do so.  See “—Development of Synergies: Multiservice Contracts to Benefit Industrial and Commercial Clients” below.


customers is constantly increasing.

Our Overall Strategy

Our aim is to continue to reinforceSince our position as world leader in environmental services. Ourcreation, our strategy focuses on developing the most appropriate environmental service solutions for our local and industrial clients; the maintenance of a geographically diverse area of activity; the development of a significant presence in growth markets with high potential and an acceleration of synergies between our different businesses.    

Whilehas been aimed at strengthening our position as a worldwide leaderglobal reference in the provision ofexpanding environmental services market. Going forward, our ambition is to set the corporate standard in sustainable development.

We are the sole international company focused entirely on the environmental services business, operating through four Divisions: Water, Environmental Services, Transportation and Energy Services. We operate both in France and abroad, serving a customer base primarily composed of public authorities, but also including industrial and service sector customers.

We provide most of our services under secured long-term contracts that generate recurring income. The services rendered must be tailored to the specific requirements of each customer. Achieving both economic efficiency and environmental performance is time-consuming and the length of the contract term allows performance gains to be generated over time as part of an overall strategy encompassing technical, management and social considerations.

Over the past fifteen years, we have demonstrated our ability to develop management models adapted to different countries and, as a result we now carry on over half of our business outside of France. Given the scale of requirements in the environmental services sector, we have the opportunity to continue our international expansion in a selective manner, favoring high economic development regions and countries with the best track record for accepting our corporate model and complying with long-term contractual commitments.

While continuing to implementexpand in France and Europe, the historical home of our businesses, we are also focusing on the countries of North Asia, particularly China, where there is an important need for service requirements linked to urban growth business model aimed atthat meet environmental standards. We are also focused on North America and the Middle East and the Persian Gulf.



14



Back to Contents


Over-and-above improving our solid economic and financial condition.  This solidity isperformance, essential to a resultsolid balance sheet and creating shareholder value, we aim to maintain and strengthen our performance with innovation, helping us to stay substantially ahead of economies of scale, constantly evolving technologythe competition and know-how (supported by ever-growing research investment), long-term commitments to clients and risk management.




Back to contents



The most appropriate solutions in environmental services ensure that we developanchor our client relationships.


While preserving the local character of our business, we have become a major actor in each of our main businesses, whethercorporate performance in the services business orlong-term, thanks to which the employability and professional satisfaction of employees can be maintained in a spirit of solidarity as technology evolves. We also aim to improve our contribution to society, by supporting the common good on behalf of customers in territories where we operate. Veolia Environnement aims to be an exemplary company, adopting a balanced and responsible approach in all areas.

Adapting our strategy to the economic climate

In order to maintain this potential over the long-term, we must continually adapt. We are therefore strengthening our efficiency and cost reduction program, maintaining our efforts in the concessions business. We have forgedEnvironmental Services sector, primarily with a unique position within these two client segments.view to turning around activities in Germany and Italy and continuing to rotate our asset portfolio through a structured arbitrage policy.


Until 2007, Group growth was mainly organic and profitable. External growth transactions in 2007 and 2008 were financed by a share capital increase in 2007 and internally generated profits. As such, we currently enjoy a healthy financial structure. No major debt repayments are due before 2012 and the average maturity of debt is ten years, with 64% of net debt in the form of bonds.

WithinOur profitability suffered a mechanical dilution due to strategic acquisitions focused on providing high quality platforms, notably in Germany, to strengthen the municipal area, we have completedGroup’s positions and assets with a longer pay-back, which represent an inherent part of the Group’s long-term contracts, but which enable us to continue our portfolio of existing French and European clients (Prague, Bucarest, Nottingham, Braunschweig), but have also had a number of commercial successesdevelopment in growth sectors, particularly in the United States (Indianapolis, Chicago, Boston …) and China. We hope to achieve an increase in Group profitability from the improved profitability of recent acquisitions and a more balanced split between assets with a longer pay-back and other Group assets. In addition, measures already implemented in 2009 and which will be continued in 2010 (reduction in the cost base and rotation of the asset portfolio) will help accelerate a return to higher profitability in the short-term. (see “Item 5 – Operating and Financial Review and Prospect s”).

Investment activity will be subject to increased vigilance, with the application of more stringent selection criteria. This explains our decision to encourage profitable organic growth offering high added value, which mobilizes our discriminating expertise in complex, global challenges. We are also continuing our asset disposal plan. The disposal of assets with a value of some €3 billion is now scheduled for the period 2009-2011 (after generating €1.3 billion in 2009), in order to internally generate the resources necessary for long-term growth. Finally, we plan to accelerate the cost reduction program launched pursuant to strategic objectives set in 2007, in order to adapt the Company to the global economic crisis. Cost savings are targeted to reach €250 million in 2010. This program to reduce the cost base will become a permanent program that will be overseen by the newly created Operations Department.

We believe that the decentralized structure of the Group allows us to be highly reactive. The success of the measures described above will require substantial efforts at all levels of Veolia Environnement, which will be placed under greater pressure. This decentralized structure, organized along geographical lines, was reinforced in 2008. It is based on the appointment of Company managers in charge of one or several countries in each geographical region where we are present (Central and Eastern Europe, France, Asia, PacificMiddle East/Africa, North America and Australia, Northern Europe, South America and Southern Europe). The role of these managers is transversal and primarily involves, at a local level, the coordination and implementation of the strategy and commercial policy of the Company and its subsidiaries, the representation of the Group and its businesses and the implementation of shared and mutualized resources. Coordination within each region (Canton, Shanghai, Incheon, Melbourne).  Thus,will be the responsibility of persons chosen notably among Division Chief Executive Officers that are members of the Group’s Executive Committee. The aim is to satisfy the demands of our customers for a single contact able to provide a comprehensive response to major transversal challenges, such as climate change and taking account of the rarity of essential resources such as water, air and energy.



15



Back to Contents


By adapting to the current economic downturn, we will be ready to capitalize, when the time comes, on our position as a global reference in complementary diversified activities, as well as on the benefits of our size, wide geographical presence and synergies between our businesses. Our businesses offer strong growth potential in the medium to long term as a result of demographical growth, particularly in urban areas, and increasingly strict environmental standards. Some examples of growth opportunities include:

According to a report by an independent third party, by 2015, the potential market for seawater desalination, a market in which we have illustrateda leadership position due to our ability to win large privatizations and bids for large projects.


Historically we have conducted an important part of our business through our industrial and commercial clients, particularly in energy and waste management services.  We have also created a new business portfolio made up of large industrial accounts (Peugeot, Novartis, Renault…), with a significant contribution coming from multi-service contracts.


Successful Geographic Diversification


Our international business continues totechnological expertise, could represent €5 billion per year, while used water recycling capacity could increase alongside the volume of business in France, which has continued to grow atby an average annual rate of over 5%10%.

According to the OECD, household waste production, which has been increasing steadily in OECD countries over the last two decades, is expected to continue to increase through 2020 from 500 to 650 kg per year since 2000.inhabitant. 30% of current energy consumption could be optimized without the need for any major technological change.


The European market has become our domestic market, but we have forged strong positions inIn the United States and Asia. Our presence in developed countries presents relatively little risk of decreasing as it is largely unaffected by relocations and restructurings.


We have developed a significant business presence in emerging and developing countries. Our economic position within these areas of the world is much more significant than appears fromurban transportation sector, the proportion of the population living in urban areas over the next 30 years is projected to increase by a possible 30%, according to the United Nations Population Information Network. This, combined with the necessarily increasing commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, opens up significant development opportunities.

The Group has taken a proactive approach to these challenges and offers ways of accelerating or facilitating the necessary or foreseeable changes that may be decided by its partners and, more generally, by our revenues earned in these areas.


A strategycompanies and all other players. This approach is primarily reflected by a research and development policy and the practical development of technological innovations. We are also focused on the growth and high-potential markets


Our strategy focuses on growth markets.  Our markets are divided into categories by business and client type.


The industrial markets are currently growing rapidly: as a resultsystematic development of increasingly restrictive regulations and with the objective of improving their competitiveness, industrial companies are increasingly outsourcing environmental services through long-term partnerships. These partners, who generally work on all of the industrial sites of the client, tend to provide global services.


The growth in the municipal markets principally results from the combination of several demographic factors: an increase in population size on the one hand, and the urban development rate on the other. Growth is also tied to economic activity and living standards. The tightening of environmental constraints and related regulations have proven to be key factors in our growth.


Economic constraints affecting our industrial clients, as well as our municipal clients, tend to increase their need to reduce water and energy consumption and waste production. Our position as a service provider, as opposed to utility provider, generally allows us to take advantage of this trend.  


Synergies between our different businesses accelerate our growth


Within our environmental services business to public authorities and industrial clients, we enjoy important synergies between water, waste management, transportationcurrent and energy services. By offering a complete range of services, we have become an environmental partner with our clients who resort to allfuture components of our business services.activities and businesses and pay constant attention to optimizing our teams. We concentrate on best practices and professional skills of team members and contractual engineering that progressively integrates a “thriftier” management of natural resources (water, energy, raw materials, public spaces, etc.)


This synergy is particularly evident within countries or municipalities where demographic changes, urbanization and economic development have significantly accelerated; in these cases, we have been called upon to find solutions to growing environmental problems.





Back to contents



Strong economic and financial capabilities


Our strong position results from market growth trends, but also fromWe must build on our competitive assets, for example our technological and technical expertise, our financial situation, our geographic presence, and our experience and know-how in providing environmental services, all in compliance with regulatory requirements.


Size advantages


Our size alone provides us with significant synergies.  In addition,strengths, which include our presence in all segments of the value chain meansmarkets that are structurally buoyant, our vertically integrated structures allow uslarge asset base, our major competitive advantages, our reactivity and proximity to retain the benefits of added value.


Support of technological developments and improved know-how


We have long been developing our Research and Development. Research and Development are essential to accomplishing our missions, while allowing us to address the needs of our clients. Since 2000, we have unified our R&D business under one unique organization which is backed up by the strategic research, innovation and sustainable development committee created in 2006 by our Board of Directors.


We also benefit from the sharing of techniques in areas such as prevention of the risk of legionella, treatment and valorization of sediment, bioenergy, and management of high environmental quality buildings.


Long-term contracts


We commit to our clients for the long term. Our human resources policy centered on training allows us to focus on long term contracts, in particular through the considerable efforts of Veolia Expertise, an initiative that was renewed in 2007, after having led to significant hirings in 2005 and 2006.  


Moreover, aside from its social, environmental and ethical aspects, sustainable development directly influences the needs of clients, thus forming a crucial element within the commercial dialogue. Sustainable development trends have led to changes in our economic modelcustomers, in order to move from a volume-maximizing model to a resource-optimizing model.


Managed risks


become the corporate benchmark for sustainable development. Within this growth context, we have enacted a management and risk measurement policy, which was marked in 2006 by the roll out of a mapping of major risks atframework, the Group aims to restore profitability, in order to achieve profitable organic growth, without increasing debt, thereby achieving a balance between growth and division levels.  By putting in place a coordinated risk prevention and management plan, we are addressing this issue of fundamental concern to our future development.profitability.


These various strategic factors have allowed us to develop a profitable growth platform with room for future accelerated growth.


Our Strategy by Division

Water

Our water divisionWater Division intends to further pursuecontinue expanding its services around the development of its water services throughout the world.  In doing so, it will striveworld, while striving to ensure the health, securityquality and safety of the water it provides, the conservation of natural resources and the protection of the environment.

The growth potential of the international market for water services has the potential to grow worldwide, supportedis enhanced by four factors in particular:main factors:

·

population growth and higher urban density,density;


·

the strengtheningtightening of environmental standards and sanitary norms and regulations,health regulations;


·

the growing acceptance of the delegated public service management model and public-private partnerships as alternatives to public management, andand;

·

the attempt byon-going refocusing of industrial clients to refocuscustomers on their core businesses.


business.

Given this growth potential, we will selectively pursue our development in the water sector in ordercontinue to adopt a selective approach to optimize the allocation of our use of resources, our operating costs and our profitability. As we do so, we will relyTo take advantage of market opportunities, the Water Division capitalizes on ourits technical expertise, ourits experience in managing clientcustomer relations and the mobilization of local teams on the ground in order to anticipateforesee the future needs of public authorities. We will also continuefocus, in particular, on developing employee skills to train our employeesenable us to meet future challenges. Veolia Eau’s increasedThe development of technical expertise in variousareas such as desalination methods and wastewater recycling in particularsolutions represents a major effort to adapt to ongoing changes in market conditions.




Back to contents



the market. Going forward, Veolia Eau will seek to capitalize onbusiness trends in the Water Division are characterized by the continued sustained pace of long-term international development opportunities for development worldwide,(despite the maturingcurrent economic climate), the maturity of its largerlar ger contracts and the productivity gains resulting from efficiency programs that have been in place since 2003 (relating toimplemented (encompassing purchases, information systems and sharing of best practices).



16



Back to Contents


Environmental Services

Through our environmental services division,Environmental Services Division, we seekintend to pursue our developmentcontinue expanding as one of the world leadersglobal benchmark in the waste managementthis sector.  As is the case with our other businesses, the waste management

Demand in this sector is showing signs of consistentrising, driven by growing environmental awareness resulting in increased regulation and lasting demand, which has been reinforced by the tightening of environmental rules and regulations coupled with increasedhigher public demandexpectations in a number of countries.countries and the dawn of a new age where raw materials and energy are rare, accelerating the transformation of waste treatment and recovery methods. As a result, experts who can provide long-term services under cost-effective conditions and in accordancecompliance with environmental regulations are becoming more highly sought after.

WithinIn this favorable market environment in Europe, the United States and the Asia-Pacific region, we haveVeolia Propreté will focus its efforts to:

increase the following priorities for ourprofitability of its activities by renegotiating fees, maximizing the use of its production tools and reducing structural costs, while seeking, wherever possible, to generate economies of scale with the Group’s other businesses.

enhance its waste management division:processing capabilities, by accompanying the transformation of waste processing methods and developing its recovery technologies;

·

strengthen its competitive advantages and the added value offered by its services, while developing our waste treatment capabilitiesthe technical content of its businesses and widening our technological lead in waste treatment and recovery;


·

strengthening the offering to industrial clients by capitalizing on our masteryits command of the entire waste management chain, while seekingin order to generate synergies with our other operating divisions;offer industrial and


·

increasing the profitability of our activities by renegotiating tariffs, maximizing productivity and reducing structural costs and ensuring that all of our activities contribute to the development of high value-added services.


municipal customers comprehensive waste management solutions.

Energy Services

Through our energy services division (Dalkia),Energy Services Division, we are the Europeana world leader in the management of energy services. The Energy Services Division specializes in the provision of energy services sector. In 2000, we entered into a strategic partnershipand is present in forty-one countries around the energy services sector with EDF, a European leader in the production, distribution and sale of electricity, in order to offer clients comprehensive energy services at the best possible price.

world. The opportunities in thethis sector are significant, due to increases inthe increase over a long period of energy prices and greater public awareness of environmental problems, whichproblems. These are linked, in particular, to the risk of climate change and have led to researchthe search for solutions such as Dalkia’s initiatives to reduce the effectsproduction of greenhouse gases and encourage energy conservation. Political and regulatory developments in 2009 (European Union energy-climate package, global negotiations in preparation of the Copenhagen conference), further strengthened this favorable context.

OurDalkia’s development strategy for this division includesis focused primarily on heating and cooling networks, energy management in service sector buildings and retail centers, handling of industrial utilities, as well as energy provision and services in the health sector. Dalkia has fully embraced the objectives of reducing energy consumption and promoting renewable energy sources discussed internationally as part of the fight against climate change and we make the pursuit of these two objectives a priority, while providing expertise and service.

Dalkia’s development strategy focuses on the following geographical priorities:

·

pursuingcontinued growth in Southern Europe (Italy, Spain etc.) by participatingacross all its business sectors;

the development of large cooling networks in the trend towardMiddle East, as well as entering the Russian market consolidation and by developing our multiservices offers to for heating networks;

the private sector;


·

pursuing development in the areastrengthening of large heating networks, particularly in France and in Central and Eastern Europe; and


·

pursuing growthits presence in North America, particularly the United States, by developing our presence in theoffering management ofservices for networks, industrial utilities, shopping malls and shopping malls.health centers;


Thesethe business development priorities will depend on our ability, in China (networks and industrial utilities).

In the context of deregulated energy markets in Europe, these priorities are based on our ability to offer innovative technical solutions focused on energy efficiency, that often combine our expertise in several areas. We will also attemptaim to promote our integrated outsourcing services to public clientscustomers as well as commercialto service sector and industrial clients,customers, by combining optimized services for facilities management (heating, air-conditioning, utilities, electricity, lighting).



17



Back to Contents


Transportation

Through our transport division,specialized subsidiary, Veolia Transport, we seekaim to bebecome a major transportation service provider on a worldwide scale.

Between 2000 and 2020,2030, the proportion of the world population living in urban areas is expected to increase from 50% to 60%, and urban transporttransportation needs are expected to increase by 50% by 2020 (source: International Association of Public Transport). These demographic changes will likely increaseraise concerns relating toregarding the environment and urban congestion withand help make public transportation services constituting a foremostmajor concern for the local authorities and inhabitantscity dwellers. In addition, the Transportation business is linked to the environmental performance of large cities.  Accordingly,transportation always has some impact ontowns and regions, regional competitiveness, development and growth, the imageidentity and identitysolidarity of a large city, its economic development, urban renovation projects,citizens and local solidarity.quality of life.

We aim to establish ourselves, withinThe major challenges in this sector asare related to the force behind localever-increasing need for new transport alongsideinfrastructure and the community, throughgrowing demand to customize mass transport, create attractive public transport networks, address environmental concerns and deal with the establishmentdirect and indirect costs of subcontracts that will later evolve into partnerships.





Back to contents



automobile congestion.

Veolia Transport’s strategy for beingfocuses on improving performance in our core business of passenger transportation, with the leading private operatorfollowing priorities:

continuing efforts in marketing, innovation and sustainable development to constantly improve customer satisfaction;

constantly improving business expertise in all local land transportation methods;

giving geographical priority to a small number of public transportation servicescountries based on the attractiveness of markets and improving its performancethe intensity of local competition;

innovating both in new mobility sectors (e.g. bikes, car-sharing, collective taxis) and growth is the following:in information and energy technologies.


·

Innovation and marketing so as to offer more services of higher quality: integrated computer ticketing, traveler information;


·

The implementation of new contracts within the community, tailored to previous methods and their needs, with performance guarantees and including, if the need arises, direct investment;  


·

The continuationFurthermore, we are currently discussing a combination of our geographic growth in Europe, North AmericaTransportation business with Transdev, owned by the Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations and Australia,the RATP (see Item 8: “Financial Information Consolidated Statements and our opening up to China and India as well as certain large cities in Latin America;


·

The diversification in the transportation business, often during the early stages of the opening of markets to competition: railway freight, maritime links, transport on demand and taxis.


Other Financial Information – Significant Changes”, below).

Our Services

Our company is a unique actor in the field of services related to the environment, offering a comprehensive array of services.  We have the expertise, for example, to supply treated water and to recycle wastewater at a customer’s facility, to collect, treat and recover waste generated in the facility, and to supply heating and cooling services and optimize industrial processes used in such facility, all in an integrated service package designed to address the customer’s unique circumstances.

Our operations are conducted primarily through four divisions, each of which specializes in a single business: water, environmental services, energy services and transportation. Through these divisions, we currently provide water to more than 67 million people and 49 million people in the world with clean water, treat nearly 58 million tons of waste, satisfy the energy requirements of hundreds of thousands of buildings for our industrial, municipal and individual customers and transport approximately 2.5 billion passengers per year.  We strive to offer services to clients that span our four divisions, which are either packaged in the form of a single multiservices contract, or negotiated separately in the form of several contracts.

The following table breaks down our consolidated revenue for 2006 by geographic market and division, after elimination of all inter-company transactions.

 (in millions of euro)*

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Total

Europe

7,916.6

5,216.4

5,924.0

3,843.6

22,900.6

of which:

 France

4,802.4

3,112.1

3,535.4

1,953.1

13,403.0

Other Europe

3,114.2

2,104.3

2,388.6

1,890.5

9,497.6

Americas

763.5

1,585.5

137.2

688.9

3,175.1

Rest of the World

1,407.5

661.0

57.2

419.0

2,544.7

of which:

Africa-Middle East

704.7

91.1

32.2

14.4

842.4

Asia-Pacific

702.8

569.9

25.0

404.6

1,702.3

Total

10,087.6

7,462.9

6,118.4

4,951.5

28,620.4

*

Revenue from ordinary activities under IFRS.



The dates set forth below relating to new contracts we have won or renewed correspond to the date of announcement or signing of such contracts, or to the date of our commencement of operations under such contracts, depending on the circumstances.


Water

Through our water division, the lead company of which is Veolia Eau – CompagnieEau-Compagnie Générale des Eaux, we are the world’s leading provider of water and wastewater services for public authorities and industrial companies. Further,1 In addition, Veolia Eau, through its subsidiary Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies, (formerly known as Veolia Water Systems) is thea world leader in the designconception of technological solutions and the construction of structures necessary to performfor the performance of such services.




Back to contents



With approximately 77,840 employees around the world1, Veolia Water Eau provides drinking water to more than 6795 million people, around the world and 49supplies 66 million people in the world with clean water, and operates more than 4,400 contracts.wastewater services.

As of December 31, 2009, Veolia Eau has a permanent presence95,789 employees around the world.2 The Water Division is present in 59more than sixty-six countries, principally in France for historical reasons, but also in the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Romania. It is pursuing targeted growth in Russia, Armenia,The Asia-Pacific region (mainly China, Korea, Japan and Hungary. Asia (mainly in China, South Korea and Japan)Australia) also remains an important target for development followingobjective, with the awardsigning of a number of significant contracts with municipal and industrial clients duringcustomers over the past several years. Veolia Eau also has a presence in the United States through its contracts for the operation and maintenance of water and wastewater treatment plants, including its contract with the c itycities of Indianapolis.Indianapolis and Milwaukee. Finally, Veolia Water haswe have established a presence in the Middle East and Africa, primarily in Morocco and Gabon.

With Thanks to our coordination of a network of research centers in France and abroad, Veolia Eau has mastered numerous major technologies and tools within the water sector. As a result, Veolia Eau is therefore able to offer highly skilled services in the areas of sanitary protection, spillage reduction, productivity enhancement of water networks and plants and resource preservation.  preservation of resources.


1

Source: Global Water Intelligence (GWI), November 2009 and Pinsent Masons Water Yearbook 2009-2010.

2

Employees managed as of December 31, 2009, including 3,633 Proactiva employees allocated to its Water business.



18



Back to Contents


Combined with aour strong local presence on the ground and more than 150 years of experience in the provision ofproviding services to public authorities and industrial clients,customers, Veolia Eau’s technical aptitude provides it with an importantexpertise is a significant advantage in the extremely competitive water services market, which is extremely competitive.

market. Increased demand within the water services market has been substantially driven substantially by clientscustomers seeking to optimize the management of their existing resources, whether they be public authorities seeking to respond to the trend towards urbanization, or industrial clients.customers. New solutions, such as desalination (demonstrated byof seawater, a key new supply contractsector where Veolia Eau recently excelled in 2006 with a sea water desalination plant in Bahrain)the Middle East, or the re-use of treated water, may also be called for depending onrepresent an individual client’s circumstances.appropriate response to specific situations.

The following table shows the consolidated revenue (revenue from ordinary activities under IFRS) and operating income of our water operations in each of the last two fiscal years,Water Division, after elimination of all inter-company transactions.

(in millions of euros)*

2006

2005 adjusted ***

Change
2006/2005

    

Revenue**

10,087.6

9,134.2

10.4%

Operating income

1,160.6

1,002.3

15.8%

*

Includes our share in the results of the water activities of Proactiva, our joint venture with FCC.

**

Revenue from ordinary activities under IFRS.

***

Accounts as of December 31, 2005 were adjusted for the application of IFRIC12 standards for the treatment of concessions, so as to ensure the comparability of the fiscal years.

Water *

(€ million)

2009

2008

Change

2009/2008

Revenue

12,555.9

12,557.9

0.0%

Operating income

1,164.3

1,198.5

-2.9%

*

Including Veolia Environnement’s share in the results of the water activities of Proactiva, Veolia Environnement’s joint venture with FCC.



Overview of Water Division


Our water divisionVeolia Eau manages municipal drinking water and/or wastewater services on five continents thanks tothrough a geographical organization withfeaturing a strong local presence. Contracts with public authorities are typically long-term and range from 10 to 20 years in length but may extendand potentially up to 50 years inunder certain circumstances. These contracts take various forms, all adaptedtailored to the needs and goals of the public authority, and may include outsourcing contracts, public-private partnerships, concessions, BOT (Build, Operate & Transfer) contracts, DBO (Design, Build & Operate) contracts and others (discussed further under “—Contracts” below).others. They are generally contracts that involve the operation, design or construction of installations, with the public authority usually remaining the owner of the assets (except in the United Kingdom) and the head ofretaining authority over water policy. Further, recentRecent legislative changes will allow ushave enabled Veolia Environnemen t oto integrate more elaborate mechanisms into ourits contracts to address increases inallowing it a share of the added value produced under the contract and the division thereof (e.g., productivity(productivity gains, improvement in the level of services, efficiency criteria, etc.). Public authorities often call uponrely on Veolia Eau to manage customer relations; it has implemented specificrelations and we are constantly improving the efficiency of our services and specific information systems in response, which it continuously strives to improve.  


systems. In certain countries where public authorities wishhave sought to either to implement new water and wastewater treatment systems or to improve the functioning of existing ones, Veolia Eau also offers feasibility studies and technical assistance, which may include research plans, coordination and acceptance, network modeling and financial analysis.


Veolia Eau’s outsourcing Outsourcing contracts with industrial and commercial customers generally last from 3have a term of three to 10ten years, although certain contracts have terms of up to 20twenty years.


1

As of December 31, 2006, including Proactiva’s 1,975 employees who are active in water activities.




Back to contents



Service Contracts forwith Public AuthorityAuthorities and Industrial Clients


Customers

The main focus of our water business is onthe management of water and wastewater management services for public authorities and industrial clients.  Our water divisioncustomers. Veolia Eau provides integrated services that cover the entire water cycle. Its activities include the management and operation of large-scale, customized drinking water plants, wastewater decontamination and recycling plants, drinking water distribution networks and wastewater collection networks. Veolia Eau also manages customer relations, providing billing services and call centers.


Veolia Eau and its subsidiaries have provided outsourced water services to public authorities in France and in the rest of the world for more than 150 years under long-term contracts adaptedtailored to local environments. Currently, Veolia Eau and its subsidiaries are attempting to capitalize on the worldwide trend towards delegated management of municipal drinking water and wastewater treatment services.


Veolia Eau continues to develop its service offeringsoffering for industrial clients usingcustomers, capitalizing on its local presence in variousmany areas and itsan adapted service organization. It has accordingly becomeorganization al structure. As a result, we are active withinin this market in France, the United Kingdom, Germany and the Czech Republic, as well as in Asia (South Korea and China in particular) and the United States. Through VE Industries, Veolia Eau also contributes within VE Industries (as discussed further below) to the development of our common service offerings, of our group, in particular in Europe.



19



Back to Contents


Engineering and Technological Solutions for the Treatment of Water


Through Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies, Veolia Eau is one of the world’s leading designers of technologicaldevelops technical solutions and ofdesigns/builds the construction of facilitiesinfrastructure necessary to provide water services on behalf of public authorities and industrial and commercial clients.service sector customers. In addition, Veolia EauWater Solutions & Technologies designs, assembles, manufactures, installs and operates modular standardized and semi-standardized water and wastewater equipment and systems designed to treat water for municipal and industrial uses.uses, which is both reliable and high-performing. A local technical assistance network is available at all times for the upkeep, maintenance and after-salecustomer service of these installations.


Veolia Eau treats groundwater, surface water, brackish or seawater, wastewater and refined sludge. Thanks to the combination of physical, chemical orand biological treatments, Veolia Eau developshas developed a completecomprehensive range of specific solutions for the purification of water or the reduction or elimination of impurities in effluents. Veolia Eau’s recycle/The recycling/re-use systems installed by Veolia Eau provide customers with the ability to circulate part or all of their treated water back into plant processes, thereby reducing their water usage,consumption, operating costs and environmental damage.


Through Sade,SADE, Veolia Eau also designs, builds, renovatesrenews and recovers urban and industrial drinking water and wastewater networks and conducts related workinfrastructure, in France and around the world. Sade’sSADE’s services cover each stage of the water cycle, from its collection to its release, and its public and industrial customers benefit from Sade’sSADE’s experience in this domain.area.


Key factors

The key factors that may influence Veolia Eau’s business are of a technical, contractual and economic nature. The key factors potentially impacting the “service contracts with public authorities and industrial customers” business are the following. From an economic point of view, we will be affected by trends in volumes billed and the ability to obtain price increases, within the planned time-period in line with our objectives. From a technical point of view, our ability to satisfy service commitments negotiated with the customer or regulator will have an impact. From a commercial point of view, we will be affected by our ability to renew existing contracts under satisfactory terms and conditions in a highly competitive environment.

In contrast, the Engineering and Technological Solutions business is potentially affected, at an economic level, by the rate of projects launched by public authorities and certain major industrial companies, as trends in demand levels have a direct impact on the order book. Continued technological leadership in tender bids and the ability to manage constraints and master technical solutions in the performance of contracts are also determining factors. Finally, at a contractual level, rigor in the negotiation and performance of contracts are also key in this sector (particularly the ability to meet deadlines and cost budgets).

Description of Activities in 20062009


Our water division’s revenues increased by 10.4%Veolia Eau activity levels remained relatively stable overall in 20062009, compared to 2005, thanks to a high level of contract renewal in France, sustained organic growth outside of France, in particular in Asia and2008, but were marked by strong growth in China and the engineering andweakness of the construction businesssector, both in France and internationally.abroad. Veolia Eau revenue was not affected by the loss of any major contracts in 2009.

In 2008, the city of Paris announced its decision not to renew the delegated management contracts expiring at the end of 2009. The Paris contract represented €143 million in revenue in 2009 for Veolia Eau.

In France, Veolia Eau provides approximately 24.125 million inhabitants with drinking water supply and 16.216 million with wastewater services. ContractsPublic service delegated management contracts renewed in 20062009 represent expectedestimated total cumulative revenuesrevenue of more than €955almost €614 million. Among the contracts renewed, the more important are the drinking water and wastewater contracts agreed forIn France, despite a duration of 18 years with the city of Narbonne, which has implemented measures regarding sustainable development for the Community, and also the drinking water contracts with the city of Saint Omer and the wastewater contracts with Menton.highly competitive environment, Veolia Eau continues its development efforts in order to further increase its service offering to reachenjoyed several commercial successes. These included a new clients in areas such as:  the management of wastewater treatment plants, the management and maintenance of rainwater networks, the maintenance of non-collective wastewater installations, the wholesale sale of wa ter, and the monitoring of swimming water.

In the rest of Europe, growth was especially strong, in particular in the Czech Republic, where Veolia Eau began providing water distribution and wastewater management services to the cities of Prostejov (25-year contract) and Slany (15-year contract);  in Slovakia, where Veolia Eau signed two 30-year contracts with the municipality of Banska Bystrica on the one hand and Poprad on the other, for drinking water production and distribution, management of customer relations, and wastewater collection and treatment. In Denmark, Veolia Eau signed an eight-year contract for the management of wastewater installations for the city of Alleröd. In 2006 Veolia Eau began operating water services in the capital of Armenia, Erevan. Moreover, in 2006 Veolia Eau signed partnership agreements, including with the Russian companies Evraziysky and Eurasian Water Partnership for the development of water and wastewater pro jects in Russia. In Bucharest, Romania, Veolia Eau began operating a new water treatment plant for drinkable water in Crivina.  

In the United States, Veolia Eau, following a call for tenders, signed a contract for the design, construction and management of a wastewater treatment plant in Rockland County (State of New York). At the same time, Veolia Eau signed a contract in 2006 extending its agreement in Vancouver (Washington) for 5 years, for the management of a used water treatment plant. At the end of 2005, Veolia Eau actively participated in the repair of wastewater treatment plants in New Orleans following the damage caused by Hurricane Katrina. In July 2006, the city of Atlanta terminated its 10-year contract, signed in 2002, for the management of a sediment and discharge treatment plant for the city, following differing interpretations of each party’s contractual obligations.

In the Middle East, Veolia Eau signed several important contracts in 2006 in the Gulf states, in particular with the Emirates of Ajman for the management of wastewater services for the citytown of AjmanChaumont and concession arrangements for 27 years, including the constructionCity of a water purificationChartres wastewater treatment plant and access for inhabitants.  A five-year performance contract was signed, with an extension optionthe Roquebrune Cap Martin wastewater treatment plant. Other than the return of three years,Paris water services to local public authority control, Veolia Eau renewed all major contracts that expired during the year. In the drinking water sector, the Roche-sur-Yon, Garrigues Campagne, Bergerac and La Vallette public authorities renewed their confi dence in Veolia. In the wastewater treatment sector, the contracts with the public company Oman Wastewater Services Company, operating all wastewater services forVal Maubuée Authority in the capital, Muscat.  Paris region and the City of Nantes were successfully renewed.




BackWe also continued our sustainable development policy launched in recent years, refining our contractual model with the help of specific offerings, in order to contents


satisfy customer wishes and enable them to meet their sustainable development objectives (biodiversity, carbon footprint, etc.). Finally, as in 2008, the fall in unit consumption continued (0.6% fall in billed volume on 2008), despite relatively favorable weather conditions.


Activity contracted slightly in Europe, due mainly to a decrease in activity on completion of construction work at sites in The Hague and Belfast.

In Asia, Veolia Eau pursued its development with several major new contracts. In2009 was marked by the municipal domain, Veolia Eau signed contractsramp-up of the Tianjin Shibei contract, further organic growth in Shenzhen and robust construction activity in Shanghai in the run-up to manage water services for the cities of LuizhouWorld Expo2010 in China, (the second largest city in the Guangxi province); a contract to manage two used water treatment plants in Japan, situated in the Saitama district (close to Tokyo) and in Hiroshima. In Australia, a contract was signed to be consultant to the State of Queensland to recycle water produced by treatment installations in the region of Brisbane in an effort to combat drought, and another contract was signed for the design, construction and management of a desalination by reverse osmosis unit designed to sustain, in particular,while the Gold Coast. In the industrial sectorCoast and Sydney Desalination construction contracts came to an end in China, Veolia Eau signed an important partnership agreement with a subsidiary of Sinopec, the leading Chinese refining group, for the operating of collection, tre atment and recycling of industrial waste water from the Yanshan site. In South Korea, Veolia Eau signed two 15-year contracts for the operation of industrial water treatment works with the group Kumho. In Singapore, Veolia Eau signed a six-year contract for the construction and operation with Showa Denko, a subsidiary of the Japanese group Showa, of an industrial water treatment unit. In Australia, Veolia Eau signed a contract for the modernization of the water treatment plants for Bayswater, one of the most important electrical centers in Australia, which belongs to the leader in local electricity production, Macquarie Generation.  Australia.

In 2006, Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies recorded significant growth, due to the consolidation for one full year of a portion of the British group Weir’s activities linked to water desalination (mainly the company Westgarth based in Scotland), which were purchased in the second half of 2005.  There were also some important commercial successes during 2006. In France, Veolia Eau signed a contract to repair and enlarge a drinking water treatment plant from Lucien Grand to Saint Hippolyte and signed a contract with the city of Angers Loire-Métropole for the design and construction of a new water treatment plant for the city of Angers. In the Middle East, the technical solutions business, excluding design-construction, benefited from very favorable developments, with the supply contract for a new thermal desalination plant in Al Hidd in Bahrain and a contract for the design and construction of a discharge treatment plant for the complex Pearl GTL of Shell Qatar, in partnership with Saïpem.  Activity relating to technology solutions (aside from conception-construction) also performed well.

Finally, Veolia Eau recorded solid earnings in 2006 due to the good performance of existing contracts across all geographical areas and in all business segments.  This success was also due to the continued pursuit of measures to enhance productivity (sharing of best practices, better use of information technology, etc.) and to the progress generated by the implementation of new technology during past years.



20



Back to contentsContents



Principal Contracts 2006

The following table shows the principal contracts signed or renewed in 20062009 with either public authorities or industrial or commercial companies.1

Public Authority

authority
or

Company company
and Locationlocation thereof

Month of Signature of Contract

New Contract or Renewal

Duration of Contract


Month of
signature of
contract

New contract
or renewal

Contract
term

Estimated Total Cumulative Revenue


cumulative revenue
(in euros)

Services to be Provided
provided

France

Public AuthoritiesFrance

     

City of Narbonne
and its suburbs

August

Renewal

18 years

170 million

Management of water and waste water services.

City of Angers Loire Métropole and its suburbsChartres

June

New

5


20 years

21156 million

DesignConcession arrangement to build and construction ofoperate a newwastewater treatment plant for the clean-up of Angers’ wastewater.

The metropolitan
area of Saint Omer
Roquebrune Cap Martin

JulyJune

RenewalNew

1220 years

2650 million

Operation of drinking water services.Concession arrangement to build and operate a wastewater treatment plant

Europe
(outside France)

     

Public AuthoritiesEurope(excl. France)

Görlitz

(Germany)

January

Renewal

20 years / 7 years

310 million

Distribution of electricity and gas (20 years) and heat (7 years)

Burg

(Germany)

January

New

15 years

20 million

Management of water and wastewater services

Madrid

(Spain)

March

New

4 years

16 million

Operation of a wastewater treatment plant

Asia

     

City of Prostejov
(The Czech Republic)
Chiba

(Japan)

JanuaryMarch

New

253 years

13935 million

Production and distributionOperation of water, collection anda wastewater treatment of wastewater, management of customer relations.plant

Banska BystricaSydney

(Slovakia)(Australia)

May

NewRenewal

304 years


(plus 3 years at the customer’s option)

1.4 billion28 million (excl. option)


51 million (incl. option)

Production and distribution of water, collection and treatment of wastewater, management of customer relations.Network maintenance

Poprad

(Slovakia)

May

New

30 years

566 million

Production and distribution of water, collection and treatment of wastewater, management of customer relations.

Limerick

(Ireland)

December

New

20 years

71 million

Repair, enlargement, and operation of a wastewater treatment plant.

Asia

     

Public AuthoritiesSouth America

     

City of Luizhou (China)Petrobras

(Brazil)

September

New

302 years

330123 million

ManagementDesign and construction of a water services.treatment and reuse plant at Ipojuca

Victoria

(Australia)

May

New

15 years

43 million

Construction and operation of a wastewater treatment unit in North Ballarat.



1

Revenues expected under foreign contracts won during 2006 have been converted into euros at the rate of exchange prevailing on December 31, 2006 and represent the portion due to Veolia Eau under such contracts. Accordingly, these amounts may differ from the amounts announced in earlier press releases.




Back to contents






Public Authority

or

Company and Location thereof

Month of Signature of Contract

New Contract or Renewal

Duration of Contract


Estimated Total Cumulative Revenue

(in euros)

Services to be Provided

Asia

     

CompaniesMiddle-East

     

SinopecDoha – Ashghal

(China)

(Qatar)

JanuaryMay

New

257 years

 (plus 3 years at customer’s option)

24944 million

(excl. option)

61 million

(incl. option)

Operation and maintenance of collection,two wastewater treatment and recycling units for industrial wastewater from the Yanshan site.plants

Showa DenkoTyr Sour

(Singapore)(Lebanon)

AprilAugust

New

65 years

5331 million

OperationConstruction and operation of ultra pure water production unita wastewater treatment plant

North America

     

Public AuthoritiesNorth America

     

Rockland CountyDuke Energy

(State of New York)(USA)

MayAugust

New

73 years

34 million

Design, construction and operation of a wastewater treatment plant.

Middle East

Public Authorities

Al Hidd

(Bahrain)

April

New

1 year

25529 million

Construction of a seawater desalination plant.

Ajman

(United Arab Units)

March

New

27 years

151 million

Management of purification services.wastewater treatment plant for an electrical power plant


1

Estimated cumulative revenue represents Veolia Eau’s share in these contracts, converted into euros at the closing exchange rate as of December 31, 2009. As such, amounts indicated may differ from those reported in our press releases.




21



Back to Contents


Principal Acquisitions and Divestitures in 20062009

OnThe main acquisition and divestitures during the year include:

in France, the acquisition of Homerider, a specialist in radio meter reading;

in Europe, the buyout in Italy of the minority interest held by EMIT in SIBA, and the buyout (in April 10, 2006,and July 2009) of a 51% stake in Stirling Water Seafield Holding (Edinburgh), increasing our holding in this project to 100%. In addition, the EBRD acquired an additional interest (6.88%) in the share capital of Veolia Voda, the holding company for water activities in Central and Eastern Europe, increasing its 10% stake in this company held since 2007 to 16.88%;

in Asia, the acquisition in China by Shenzhen Water Group (in which the Group holds a total direct and indirect interest of 25%) of five companies which manage drinking water services for a Shenzhen administrative district (Baoan);

on December 22, 2009, Veolia Eau sold its interest in the English company Southern Water to Southern Water Capital Limited, the current major shareholder of Southern Water. In December 2006, Veolia Eau signed an agreement to sell its interest in the company Bonifacio Water Corporation, which, since 1998, has managed the constructionreviewed certain economic aspects (financial restructuring) and the operationsgovernance rules of its partnership with Mubadala Development Company in our operating activities in North Africa and the drinking water facilities forMiddle East. The joint venture, which was formerly fully consolidated, is now under proportionate consolidation due to these changes. This operation resulted in a residential and business center€189 million reduction in Fort Bonaifacio (Phillipines). This sale was finalized on January 2, 2007.

The sale of the company Berliner Wasser International (BWI) was not realized in 2006Group debt as had been projected, as a result of the conditions precedent in the agreement signed at the end of 2005 not having been fulfilled.

Veolia Eau created, acquired or integrated 68 companies during 2006, and liquidated or sold 23 companies. As of December 31, 2006,2009;

in Morocco, sale of an additional 5% stake in Veolia Eau’s groupEnvironmental Services Morocco to AAIF;

in the United States, sale of three Enerserve entities operating in the Caribbean by Veolia Water North America.

Following the creation, acquisition or consolidation of 36 companies in 2009 and the liquidation, divestiture or transfer of 19 companies, the Water Division (excluding Proactiva) included 636was composed of 728 companies as of December 31, 2009 compared to 591711 in 2005.2008. The principal changes includedmain movements in the purchasescope of consolidation include the acquisition or creation of new companies with contracts which were effective as of the beginning of 2006.carrying operating contacts that came into effect in 2009.

Environmental Services

Through our environmental services division,Veolia Propreté subsidiary, we are the second largest operatornumber one reference in the world (in terms of revenue)environmental services sector,1 where we are involved in the area of waste collection, recycling and treatment. Veolia Propreté is the only company that handlesprocessing and handling of waste in all its forms and at all stages of activity.  For example,the waste cycle. Veolia Propreté manages liquid and solid waste and non-hazardous and hazardous waste (with the exception of nuclear waste) from collection to energy recovery, on behalf of both public authorityauthorities and industrial clients.  customers.

At the endAs of September 2006,December 31, 2009, Veolia Propreté once again reinforced its position by acquiring Cleanaway Holdings Limited (Cleanaway UK) from the Brambles group for €744.7 million (after adjustment).  With annual revenues estimated at €684 million, Cleanaway UK is a principal operator in the United Kingdom of municipal and industrial waste collection and management services.

With approximately 89,500 employeesemployed 85,600 people2 around the world,1 Veolia Propreté operates in 36approximately thirty-three countries. Veolia Propreté has partneredpartners with more than 552,000over 750,000 industrial and commercial clientssector customers23 and serves nearly 53.4more than 73 million inhabitants on behalf of public authorities.

1

As of December 31, 2006, including Proactiva’s 6,107 employees who are active in waste management activities.   

2

The commercial figures provided in this section (in terms of number of clients, number of inhabitants served, tons of waste collected, etc.) do not take into account Proactiva’s activities, unless otherwise indicated, but do take into account Cleanaway for the fourth quarter of 2006.




Back to contents



During 2006,In 2009, Veolia Propreté estimates that it collected nearly 34.943 million tons of waste and treatedprocessed nearly 5862 million tons of waste (of which 54.4 million tons were non-hazardous household and industrial waste and 3.6 million tons were hazardous waste).waste. As of December 31, 2006,2009, Veolia Propreté managed approximately 698861 waste treatmentprocessing units.

The durationterm of Veolia Propreté’s waste management contracts usually depends uponon the nature of the services provided, applicable local regulations and the level of capital expenditure required under the contract.required. Collection contracts usually lastrange from 1one to 5five years, while treatmentwaste processing contracts can range from 1one year (for services provided on sites belonging to Veolia Propreté) to 30 years (for services involving the financing, construction, installation and operation of new waste processing infrastructure).


1

Sources: Internal studies and Eurostat.

2

Employees managed as of December 31, 2009, including 7,023 Proactiva employees allocated to its environmental services business.

3

The commercial figures appearing in this section (in terms of number of customers, number of inhabitants served, tonnages collected, etc. ) do not include Proactiva, unless otherwise indicated.



22



Back to Contents


The following table shows the consolidated revenue (revenue from ordinary activities under IFRS) and operating income of our environmental services operations in each of the last two fiscal years,Environmental Services Division, after elimination of all inter-company transactions.

(in millions of euros*)

2006

2005
adjusted ***

Change

2006/2005

    

Revenue**

7,462.9

6,748.7

10.6%

Operating income

648.3

543.6

19.3%

*

Includes our share in the results of the waste management activities of Proactiva, our joint venture with FCC.

**

Revenue from ordinary activities under IFRS.

***

Accounts as of December 31, 2005 were adjusted for the application of IFRIC12 standards for the treatment of concessions, so as to ensure the comparability of the fiscal years.

Environmental Services*

(in millions of euro)

2009

2008**

Change
2009/2008

    

Revenue

9,055.8

9,972.5

-9.2%

Operating income

453.8

265.2***

+71.1%

*

Includes Veolia Environnement’s share in the environmental service activities of Proactiva, Veolia Environnement’s joint venture with FCC.

**

In accordance with IFRS 5, Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations, results of operations of the Waste-to-Energy entities in the Environmental Services Division, partially divested in August 2009, are recorded as Net income from discontinued operations, in 2009 financial statements.

***

Includes €405.6 million of impairment charges in respect of goodwill and intangible assets of Environmental Services in Germany.


Overview of Environmental Services


Our environmental services divisionEnvironmental Services Division, Veolia Propreté, furnishes waste management and logistical services, which include waste collection, waste treatment,processing, cleaning of public spaces, offices and factories, maintenance of production equipment, treatment of polluted soil, and management of waste discharge at industrial sites.


In addition, Veolia Propreté Downstream, our Environmental Services Division conducts basic or more complex waste treatmentprocessing operations in order to reduce pollution and transform waste for the following uses:


·

into a resource. Thus, Veolia Propreté:

sorts and treatsprocesses waste in order to create new primaryraw materials, otherwise referredwhich we refer to as recycling or material recovery;


·

Veolia Propreté transforms organic material into compost to be returned to the soil, otherwise referredwhich we refer to as composting or agronomic recovery;


·

Veolia Propreté returnsprocesses waste to the natural environment in the least damaging way possible, through landfillinglandfill sites or incineration;


·

Veolia Propreté produces electricity or heat through landfilledusing waste in landfill sites or incinerated waste, otherwise referredincineration, which we refer to as waste-to-energy recovery.


The services referred to above fall into one of three large categories of activity conducted by Veolia Propreté:  waste managementmajor business sectors: environmental services and logistics for local authorities and industrial companies, sorting and recycling of materials and waste recovery and treatmentprocessing through composting, incineration and landfilling.

The key factors that may influence the activities of Veolia Propreté are of a technical, contractual and economic nature. They mainly concern the following success factors:

a presence at all points of the waste value chain, from pre-collection through to processing and recovery, in an appropriate range of geographical areas at different stages of maturity, enabling the identification and control of innovative, tailored solutions for proposal to customers and setting us apart from the competition in the market;

the management of risks relating to the protection of the environment and the safety of individuals and installations (see the “Risk Factors” above and the section on “Environmental Regulations, Policies and Compliance,” below);

the quality of employee management in sectors which are often labor-intensive (limiting absenteeism and industrial action, developing skills and training);

the ability to innovate using new technologies (processing, rolling stock) and processes (sorting-recycling), founded on an effective technology, regulatory and competition watch system;

operating efficiency (purchases, sales, logistics, maintenance management) enabling the optimization of unit costs and the utilization rate of equipment, while ensuring the high level of quality required for products and services delivered.

investment management in certain capital-intensive activities (selectivity, risk analysis, installation size).



23





Back to contentsContents



the quality of contractual management for long-term contracts (major clauses, price review formulae, guarantees and deposits, etc.). (see the Risk Factors above)

management of economic and financial risks: volatility of raw material prices (fuel, materials sold such as paper and metals), customer risk, foreign exchange and interest rate risk. (see the Risk Factors above)

Environmental Services and Logistics for Local Authorities and Industrial Companies


Maintenance of Public Spaces and Urban Cleaning


Each day, Veolia Propreté provides urban cleaning services in a large number ofmany cities throughout the world, including London, (U.K.), Paris, (France), Alexandria, (Egypt), Rabat (Morocco), Singapore and Chennai (India).Dresden. Veolia Propreté’s services include also provides mechanized street cleaning and building facade treatment of building facades.


services.

Cleaning and Maintenance of Industrial Sites


Veolia Propreté provides cleaning services toat the sites of its industrial and commercial clients’ installations,service sector customers, including cleaning of offices and maintenance of production lines. In the commercial sector, it provides these services in train stations, subway networks, airports, museums and commercial centers.


In the industrial sector, cleaning services extendare extended to food-processing plants, and heavy industry and high-tech sites, where Veolia Propreté offers specialized cleaning services (high pressure or extreme high pressure cleaning). Veolia Propreté also offers cryogenic cleaning, and reservoir cleaning services at refineries and petro-chemical sites in particular.sites. Finally, Veolia Propreté has developed emergency services to treat site contamination uponin the occurrenceevent of an accident or other incident.


Liquid Waste Management


Through its specialized subsidiary SARP, Veolia Propreté provides liquid waste management services that consist primarily of pumping and transporting sewer network liquids and oil residues to treatment centers. Veolia Propreté can also provide services following accidents and other incidents involving liquid waste.


Veolia Propreté has developed liquid waste management procedures that emphasize environmental protection, such as the on-site collection and the recycling and reuse of water during the provisionprocessing of its liquid waste management services.waste. Used chemicals,oil, which areis hazardous tofor the environment, areis collected before treatmentprocessing and transferred to one ofre-refining by a Veolia Propreté’s subsidiaries that is specialized subsidiary specializing in the management of hazardous waste.


Treatment of Polluted Soil


Decontamination

Land redevelopment and the expansion of residential or commercialand business areas may occur in areaslead to the use of sites where the soil has been polluted through prior use. Veolia Propreté has specific techniques for treating each site,difficult sites, which include treating polluted soil and rehabilitating temporarily inactive industrial areas, cleaning up accidental spills and restoringbringing active industrial sites to be ininto compliance with applicable environmental regulations.


Collection


In 2006,2009, Veolia Propreté collected approximately 34.943 million tons of waste on behalf offrom private individuals, local authorities and commercial and industrial sites. More than 53.473 million people around the world benefited from Veolia Propreté’s waste collection services.


Veolia Propreté collects household waste through door-to-door pickup or through pickup at designated drop-off sites, and collects commercial and non-hazardous industrial waste. It maintains the cleanliness of green spaces and carries away “green” waste such as dead leaves and grasses.


Veolia Propreté also collects hazardous waste on behalf of its commercialservice sector and industrial clients, including hospital waste, laboratory waste and oil residue (ships, gas stations and drilling platforms).  In 2006, and diffused hazardous waste. Veolia Propreté collected approximately 1.85 million tons of hazardous waste.


Veolia Propretéalso offers related services to its commercialservice sector and industrial clients,customers, such as preliminary studies of future waste collection needs and waste tracking after collection.


Transfer and Grouping of Waste


When waste isWaste of the same type it is transported either to transfer stations in order to be carried in large capacity trucks, or to grouping centers where it is separated by type and then sorted before being sent to an adapted treatmentthe appropriate processing center. Hazardous waste is usually transported to specialized physico-chemical treatmentprocessing centers, recycling units, special industrial waste incineration units or landfillslandfill sites designed to receive inert hazardous waste.




24



Back to contentsContents



Sorting and Recycling of Materials


Veolia Propreté treatsprocesses waste with a view towardsto reintroducing such waste into the industrial production cycle. Veolia Propreté's’s recycling activities generally involve the selective collection of paper, cardboard, glass, plastic, wood and metal that customers either separate into different containers or minglemix with other recyclable materials. As the use of separate containers has become more widespread, selective collection services have become well developed.


Veolia Propreté received approximately 7.410.3 million tons of solid waste at its 243352 sorting and recycling units in 2006,2009, of which 4.67.7 million tons were recovered, including 2.2 million tons of paper.recovered. Veolia Propreté also provides decomposition services for complex waste products at specialized treatment centers, such as electric and electronic products and fluorescent lamps. Veolia Propreté works upstream in partnership with upstream industrial customers and with Veolia Environnement’sour CREED research center in order to develop new recycling activities. Veolia Propreté sellsRecycled material is sold or distributes recycled materialdistributed to intermediaries or directly to industrial and commercial clients.customers.


Veolia Propreté designs and develops recycling systems that enable its industrial and commercial customers to optimize their production chains by reusing certain waste by-products generated in the manufacturing process, thereby reducing waste management costs.


Waste Recovery and Treatment through Composting, Incineration and Landfilling


In 2006,2009, Veolia Propreté treatedprocessed nearly 5862 million tons of waste in its sorting and recycling centers, composting units, hazardous waste treatment centers, incineration units and landfills.landfill sites.


Composting and Recovery of Organic Material from Fermentable Waste


Veolia Propreté and Veolia Eau work together to recover sludge from wastewater treatment plants. In 2006,At its 122 composting units, Veolia Propreté recovered almost 2 million tons of waste at its 102 composting units. 224,000 tons ofprocesses urban and industrial sludge, were reintegrated by Veolia Propretépart of which is then re-introduced into the agricultural cycle through manure spreading.land spreading, with a related tracking service offered.


Veolia Propreté’s “Biodiv” service includes an adapted container offer for the frequent collectionIncineration and nearby composting treatment of organic waste produced by industrial companies, while guaranteeing the complete traceability of waste from its collection to its recovery in the form of high quality compost.


Waste-to-Energy and Incineration


Recovery

Veolia Propreté treats approximately 10.3 million tons of non-hazardous solid waste (consisting mainly of urban waste) per year at its 72operates seventy-nine waste-to-energy recovery and incineration plants.plants, which process non-hazardous solid waste (mainly urban waste). Energy is generated from the heat created by incinerating waste at these plants. Veolia Propreté uses this energy to supply district thermalurban heating networks or for salessells it to electricity providers. Waste-to-energy recovery is often the favored treatment solution in areas of high population density where there is insufficient space to construct landfills.


Landfilling and EnergyWaste-to-Energy Recovery from Waste


In 2006,2009, Veolia Propreté treated approximately 34.4 million tons ofhad 147 non-hazardous waste in 146 landfills.landfill sites. Veolia Propreté has developed the expertise to treatprocess waste through methods that reduce emissions of liquid and gas pollutants. Veolia Propreté currently has 142 landfills that accept or have accepted biodegradable waste and that are equipped to retrieve and treat biogas emissions from the anaerobic fermentation of waste, of which 64 landfills85 landfill sites have recovery systems to transform biogas emissions into alternative energies.


TreatmentProcessing of Hazardous Waste


In 2006,2009, Veolia Propreté treated 3.6 million tons of hazardous waste, of which 1,006,000 tons were incinerated in 22had 24 incineration units for specialized industrial waste,679,000 tons were landfilled in 13waste, 70 processing units using physico-chemical and stabilization methods, 14 class 1 landfillslandfill sites and 1.55 million tons were treated in 57 units by physico-chemical or stabilization methods.  The remaining 361,000 tons were treated in 3236 specialized recycling centers.


The principal methods used for treatingprocessing industrial hazardous waste are incineration (for organic liquid waste, salt-water and sludge), solvent recycling, waste stabilization followed by treatment inprocessing at specially-designed landfills,landfill sites, and physico-chemical treatmentprocessing of inorganic liquid waste.


Through its specialized subsidiaries, SARP Industries and VES Technical Solutions (in the United States), and thanks to its acquisition at the end of 2005 of the hazardous waste management activities of the Shanks group in the United Kingdom, as well as the reinforcement of its position in Europe and Asia with recent interest acquisitions and the repurchase of business in Switzerland, India and Singapore, Veolia Propreté has a worldwide network of experts, enablingwhich has helped it to become one of today’sa world leadersleader in treating,processing, recycling and recovering hazardous waste.



25



Back to Contents


Description of Activities in 2006


2009

In 2006,2009, the Environmental Services Division reported a fall in revenue, about half of which was attributable to a fall in the volume and price of materials sold (mainly paper, cardboard and metals). Prices had reached an all-time high in the second quarter of 2008, before collapsing at the end of 2008, after which they commenced a partial and progressive recovery (except ferrous metal). In addition, the economic crisis hit industry-related activities hard (collection and processing of industrial waste, industrial services), with activity levels stabilizing but not recovering in the final months of 2009. In this context, Veolia Propreté’s revenues increased by 10.6% compared rapidly implemented a tailored plan to 2005. French revenues increased by 4.1% (of which 3.7% was internal) as a result of the increased power of new incineration plantsadjust costs to activity levels and the growth in quantity of solid waste collected and treated. Internationally, excluding Proactiva, organic growth was 10.8%. It was particularly marked in the United States in all business sectors, with a growth rate of 13.2%. In the United Kingdom, total growth was 34.2% (of which 6.9% was internal). This growth resulted from the acquisition of Cleanway UK and from the general development of business in a robust market. In Asia, the initiation of the




Back to contents



Foshan (storage) and Guangzou-Likeng (incineration) contracts largely contributed to the 14% growth in business. Veolia Propreté did not lose any major contracts in 2006. Among the significant developments during the year were the following:


introduce efficiency measures.

In France, Veolia Propreté continuedin addition to develop its treatment capacities.the negative impact of the fall in the price of materials sold (paper, cardboard and metal), the drop in revenue was mainly due to the decrease in non-hazardous and hazardous waste volumes collected and processed. In January, with the SNPE (Société Nationale des Poudres et Explosifs), Veolia Propreté createdincineration business, the company Pyrotechnis, which is specializedkiln void-filling policy and the good performance of incinerators enabled revenue growth, further driven by the recent Cenon contract signed at the end of 2008. Moderate price increases were achieved in demilitarization and cleaninga low-inflation context, marked by a fall in fuel prices. In the sorting-recycling business, the Ludres high-performance materials recovery facility inaugurated in June 2009, gradually ramped-up activity. Finally, at the end of floors polluted by pyrotechnic substances, as well as2009, the destruction of expired pyrotechnic substances. Veolia Propreté was chosenfirst French pilot unit for the constructionproduction of a biodiesel production unitbiofuel from biogas produced by non-hazardous waste in Limay (78). This project is part of a program put in place by the French government for the development of biofuels, designed to promote renewable energy and counter the greenhouse effect. The plant will be able to produce 60,000 tons of biodiesel per year. Furthermore, Veolia Propreté has taken over management of the incineration plant in Antibes for a 20 year term, launched its new waste treatment industrylandfill sites, commenced activity in the Marne (Auréade), opened a new industrial waste s orting center in Villeneuve Tolosanne (Haute Garonne) and put into service the first mechanized D3E (Déchets d’Equipments Electriques et Electroniques) dismantlement and sorting unit in France on its Gonesse site (95), thus reinforcing its new generation sorting center installations.


Greater Paris region.

In the United Kingdom, Veolia Propreté, while managingrevenue fell due to a decrease in industrial and commercial waste collection and landfill volumes, a downturn in industrial services and the acquisition and integrationloss of Cleanaway UK, has won or renewed severallocal authority waste collection contracts and initiated,(such as the Liverpool contract at the end of June, a 26-year2008). Price increases in the collection and landfill sector helped limit the decrease in revenue. Internal growth also benefited from the new 20-year PFI (“Private Finance Initiative”)contract signed in May 2009 with the Merseyside Waste Disposal Authority and the full year impact of the recently signed Southwark and West Berkshire contracts.

Revenue fell more significantly in Germany, mainly due to the fall in paper and cardboard prices and the decrease in non-hazardous industrial waste volumes collected.

North American revenue fell due to the decrease in industrial and commercial waste collection and landfill volumes, partially offset by the efficiency of price increase measures. Revenue was also affected by the impact of the economic crisis on the industrial services and hazardous waste sectors. Major contracts lost in 2009 include the waste collection and processing contracts for the New York City boroughs of Manhattan and Queens, the contract for the integrated managementmaintenance of household wastegreen areas in Birmingham, Alabama, and the Airbus industrial services contract in the County of Nottinghamshire (estimatedUnited Kingdom. These contracts represented total cumulativeestimated annual revenue of €1.2 billion).€26 million.


In Europe, Veolia Propreté continued to reinforce its commercial positions and its treatment capabilities in all countries, particularly Norway, Germany, Belgium, Switzerland, Italy, Denmark, Poland and Romania.

26



In North America, Veolia Propreté won or renewed large municipal contracts and reinforced its position in industrial services, winning, in particular, several contracts for the maintenance and industrial underwater cleaning of oilrigs in the Gulf of Mexico.


In Australia, Veolia Propreté continued its growth in industrial services and managed the development of the waste storage center at Woodlawn. Furthermore, Veolia was chosenBack to undertake the planning and implementation of the management and recycling of all waste for the Commonwealth Games 2006, which began in March in Melbourne.


In Asia, Veolia Propreté strengthened its position in the treatment and recovery of ordinary and hazardous waste in several countries.


In Brazil and in Egypt, Veolia Propreté won two “MDP” (Mécanisme de Développement Propre) projects, representing a total of 4.4 million equivalent tons of CO2, in terms of credit generated. Veolia Propreté thus participates in worldwide efforts to limit greenhouse gases and combats global warming.Contents


Principal Contracts


in 2009

The following table shows the principal contracts signed or renewed in 20062009 with either public authorities or industrial or commercialservice sector companies.1

Public Authority

authority or

Company company and Locationlocation thereof

Month of Signaturesignature of Contractcontract

New Contractcontract or Renewalrenewal

Duration of Contract


term

Estimated Total Cumulative Revenue

cumulative revenue
(in euros)

Services to be Providedprovided

France

Public AuthoritiesFrance

     

Romainville (Syctom Paris area)COBAN Atlantique (Arcachon basin)

June

Renewal

2 years

35 million

Operation of waste sorting and transfer centers and of the waste collection center of Romainville.

Syctom (Paris area)

April

New

8 years and 5 months

20 million

Transport, processing and marketing of clinkers.

Bil Ta Garbi Union (Bayonne)

February (initiation)May

New

5 years

24-3618 million

Transfer, transport and treatmentCollection of household waste and hospital waste.equivalent

Chevreuse Valley SIOM

November

Renewal

8 years

72 million

Collection of household waste and equivalent

Limoges City Conurbation

June

Renewal

6 years

37 million

Collection of household waste and equivalent

Rouen Conurbation

October

Renewal

6 years

29 million

Collection of household waste and equivalent

Val de France Conurbation

November

Renewal

8 years

24.5 million

Collection of household waste and equivalent

Azur Provence Conurbation

October

Renewal

5 years

23 million

Collection of household waste and equivalent

Nevers Conurbation

February

New

20 years

17.5 million

Construction and operation of a drop-off center for professionals

Europe (outside(excl. France)

     

Merseyside Waste Disposal Authority (United Kingdom)

May

New

20 years

720 million

Integrated comprehensive waste management contract

North America

Seminole County (Florida)

November

New

8 years

16 million

Collection of household waste and equivalent

Asia – Pacific

Hong-Kong Special Administrative Region

November

Renewal

10 years

174 million

Operation and maintenance of a hazardous waste treatment facility

North Africa

Nador (Morocco)

February

New

7 years

18 million

Collection of household waste and equivalent and urban cleaning services



1

Revenues expected under foreignthe contracts won during 2006in 2009 have been converted into euros at the closing exchange rate as of exchange prevailing on December 31, 20062009 and represent the portion due to Veolia Propreté under such contracts. Accordingly, these amounts may differ from the amounts announced in earlier Group press releases.




27



Back to contentsContents






Public Authorities

London Borough of Brent (United Kingdom)

November

Renewal

7 years

150 million

Collection and recycling of municipal waste, urban cleaning.

Hastings Borough Council (United Kingdom)

May

Renewal

7 years

27 million

Collection of municipal waste and urban cleaning.

Municipality of New Esbjerg (Denmark)

July

New

5 years

14 million

Collection of municipal waste.

North America

Public Authorities

New York City

January

Renewal

3 years

51 million

Transfer stations.

Port Orange

August

Renewal

5 years

26 million

Collection and treatment of household and commercial waste, and urban cleaning.

Companies

ExxonMobil

October

Renewal

5 year

15 million

Hazardous waste.

Asia

Companies

Public Authorities

Tomago Aluminium (Australia)

July

New

5 years

39 million

Industrial services and global management of waste.

General Motors Holden (Australia)

February

Renewal

3 years

18 million

Industrial services.


Main Acquisitions and Divestitures in 20062009

On September 28, 2006,In July 2009, an agreement was signed with Covanta Holding Corporation for the sale of Montenay International, the portfolio of North American waste-to-energy contracts. This divestiture encompasses the management and maintenance contracts for seven sites. The transaction was finalized in 2009, with the exception of one site, the sale of which was completed in February 2010. In August 2009, Veolia Propreté finalized the acquisition of Cleanaway Holdings Limited (Cleanaway UK) from the Australian group Brambles, significantly reinforcing its position in the waste management sector in the United Kingdom (for industrial markets, as well as local municipality markets).  In addition, on June 30, 2006, Veolia Propreté acquired Biffa Belgique, number 4 in the Belgian waste market.  Other acquisitions, of a less significant size, occurred at the end of 2006. They will contributeNettoyage et Multiservices (VPNM) was sold to the growthTFN Group. VPNM provides site cleaning services and waste sorting and collection services at sites mainly located in France. These transactions form part of Veolia Propreté’s treatment and recovery capacities in various European countries.the multi-year divestiture program announced by the Group on March 6, 2009.


Taking into account all foundings, acquisitions and integrations of companies (a total of 58) and liquidations, sales, and mergers (a total of 42),Following the scope ofcreation, acquisition or consolidation of Veolia Propreté20 companies in 2009 and the liquidation, divestiture or transfer of 94 companies, the Environmental Services Division (excluding Proactiva) included 625comprised 692 companies atas of December 31, 2006,2009, compared to 609766 in 2005.  The acquisitions of Cleanaway and Biffa Belgique accounted for the principal changes in scope of consolidation.2008.


Energy Services

Our energy services division conducts itsWe conduct our Energy Services activities through Dalkia, thea leading European provider of energy servicesEnergy Services to companies and municipalities.public authorities. Dalkia provides services relating to heating and cooling networks, decentralized energy production, thermal and multi-technical systems, industrial utilities, installation and maintenance of production equipment, integrated facilities management and street lighting. It seeks to profit fromelectrical services on public streets and roads. We seize opportunities presentedoffered by the development of the energy and greenhouse gas emission reduction markets. Dalkia becomes a partner tojoins forces with its clients,customers, helping them to optimize their energy purchases and improve the energy efficiency of their installations (both in terms of cost and atmospheric emissions).





Back to contents



With approximately 48,800As of December 31, 2009, Dalkia had 52,557 employees in 42 countries around the world (as of December 31, 2006), Dalkia has a permanent presenceand particularly in 35 countries, located principally in France and the rest of Europe.


The following table shows the consolidated revenue (revenue from ordinary activities under IFRS) and operating income of our energy services operations in each of the last two fiscal years,Energy Services Division, after elimination of all inter-company transactions.

Energy Services

(in millions of euro)

2009

2008**

Change
2009/2008

    

Revenue*

7,078.6

7,446.3

-4.9%

Operating income*

415.5

434.4

-4.4%

*

Including our share of revenue and operating income in industrial multi-service entities.

**

In accordance with IFRS 5, Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations, the results of operations from the Clemessy and Crystal entities and renewable energy activities in the Energy Services Division, respectively divested in December 2008 and in the process of divestiture in 2009, are recorded as Net income from discontinued operations, in the 2009 financial statements.


(in millions of euros)

2006

2005
adjusted**

Change

2006/2005

    

Revenue*

6,118.4

5,463.6

12.0%

Operating income

377.7

315.3

19.8%

*

Revenue from ordinary activities under IFRS.

**

Accounts as of December 31, 2005 were adjusted for the application of IFRIC12 standards for the treatment of concessions, so as to ensure the comparability of the fiscal years.


Overview of Energy Services


Dalkia’s business is currently facing three major challenges: global warming and the need to reduce carbon dioxide emissions; the increase in the price of fossil fuels and their eventual scarcity; and growing urban expansion and related industrial development.

Dalkia’s activity focusesThis business is focused on optimal energy management.management, and Dalkia has progressively establishedset up a range of activities linked to energy management, including heating and cooling systems,networks, decentralized energy production, thermal and multi-technical services, industrial utilities, installation and maintenance of production equipment, integrated facilities management and electrical services on public streets and roads.


The health sector is also of strategic importance to Dalkia.

Dalkia provides energy management services to public and private clientscustomers with whom it has formedwhich we form long-term partnerships. Dalkia’sManagement contracts to operatefor the operation of urban heating systemsor cooling networks are typically long-term, lasting up to 25 or 30 years, while its contracts to operatefor the operation of thermal and multi-technical installations for public or private clientscustomer may lasthave terms of up to 16 years. Contracts to provide industrial utilities services generally have shorter terms (6(six to 7seven years on average), while contracts in the facilities management sector generally last 3have terms of three to 5five years.



When28



Back to Contents


Whenever possible, Dalkia offers solutions to its clients solutions utilizingcustomers using renewable or alternative energy sources such as geothermal energy, biomass (organic material), solar energy (thermal, photovoltaic, solar concentration), heat recovered from household waste incineration, “process” heat (heat produced by industrial processes) and thermal energy produced by co-generation projects. A combination of energyEnergy sources may also be selected so asare combined, wherever possible, to take advantage of the complementaritycomplementary nature of each source.


For instance, In the biomass sector, Dalkia considerably stepped-up its development in 2006, Dalkia put into service a biomass plant in2009 by virtue of the Lithuanian capital.  This allows Vilniaus Energijainnovative services we propose to reduce its dependence on fossil fuels and favors local development.  Vilniaus Energija’s boiler is the largest biomass installation ever built by Dalkia.


authorities.

Heating and Cooling Networks


Dalkia is one of Europe’s leading operators of large “district”urban heating and cooling networks. Dalkia currently manages 682 district810 urban heating and cooling networks worldwide, particularly in the world, particularly inUnited States, France, the United Kingdom, Italy, Germany, Eastern and Central Europe and the Baltic states.  Dalkia does not ordinarily own the networks it operates.  Rather, in most cases, public authorities own the networks and delegate to Dalkia the responsibility of managing, maintaining and repairing them. The networks operated by Dalkia provide heating, sanitary hot water and air conditioning to a wide varietyrange of public and private facilities, including schools, health centers, office buildings and residences.


Thermal and Multi-Technical Services


Thermal services consist of operating heating, sanitary hot water and air conditioning systems to provide comfortable living and working environments, as well as improving the operation of existing systems to optimize their efficiency. Dalkia provides public, industrial and commercialservice sector customers with integrated energy services which include installationincluding plant design, construction and improvement, energy supply, installationand plant management and maintenance. Dalkia provides customers with a largewide range of technical services and implements new service offerings to satisfy demands for improved energy efficiency. It manages approximately 110,000more than 115,000 energy installationsplants throughout the world.


Industrial Utilities, Installation and Maintenance of Production Equipment


Dalkia has become a leading provider of industrial utilities services in FranceEurope and the United Kingdom. It has thereby developed expertise regardingin the analysis of industrial processes, the enhancement of productivity and the operation, maintenance and servicingrepair of equipment.


Dalkia provides services at approximately 4,100 industrial sites.

Integrated Facilities Management


Facilities management contracts integratecombine a range of services, in a single comprehensive service relationship, from the maintenance of thermal, electrical and mechanical equipment maintenance to logistics, into one global service.  Aslogistics. Accordingly, the various needs of customers are satisfied by a result, the client can meet its need for different services through onesingle company. Dalkia provides facilities management services for its industrial or commercialand service sector customers such as business(business premises, corporate offices, or health establishment sites.


institutions, etc.), covering a total surface area of over 100 million square meters.

Street Lighting Services


Citélum,a subsidiary of Dalkia, has acquiredearned a worldwide reputation for the management of urban street lighting, the regulation of urban traffic and the lighting of monuments and other structures. In France, Citélum operates and maintains the lighting forin a number




Back to contents



of cities in France and abroad, and provides artistic lighting services forat important architectural works and sites. 2006 saw the opening of an establishment in Chile and the signing of a contract in Asia with Ho Chi Minh City.  Citélum also renewed and won several contracts in France (with the city of Paris, for example) in Spain with the city of Almeria and in Latin America (Brazil, Mexico and Chile).


Services to Individuals


Together with Veolia Eau, Dalkia provides residential services to private individuals and cooperative housing customers through Proxiserve, a joint subsidiary of Dalkia and Veolia Eau,(energy/water services), including the maintenance of heating air conditioningsystems, plumbing and plumbing systemsrenewable energy services and meter-reading services. The activities of the Energy Services Division may be influenced by the following key factors, which are primarily of a technical, contractual or economic origin:

contract management, enabling the identification of risks borne by the Company and those borne by our customers. Contract management takes account of necessary regulatory developments, which are monitored by the Division, and the implementation of a research and development program, enabling further improvements to our performance and competitive advantage (see Risk Factors above);

procurement management: primarily purchases of raw materials, to optimize costs and secure fuel supplies for the installations we manage (see Risk Factors above).

environmental protection: optimization of energy efficiency, control of atmospheric emissions and a renewable energies-based offering (see Risk Factors, above, and Environmental Regulations, Policies and Compliance below)



29



Back to Contents


Description of Activities in 20062009


Veolia Énergie Services’ (Dalkia) revenues increased by 12%In 2009, the Energy Services Division reported a slight fall in 2006 compared to 2005,revenue. This decrease was mainly due to a fall in energy prices.

2009 was marked by the combinationongoing refocusing of solid growth, risingdivision activities on its core business, which is the production and distribution of energy prices, and a renewalthe management of interestenergy services. This led to the divestiture of the facilities management business in the heating industryUnited Kingdom (see “Main acquisitions and divestitures in France (Cergy-Pointoise, Sarcelles), as well as international developments.


2009” below).

In 2006,France, despite the commercial slowdown, Dalkia won several contracts:France renewed close to 86% of contracts that expired during the year.


The large number of new contracts and the development of contracts in portfolio, at a rate over twice that of erosion, enabled the Division to grow its business portfolio. Overall, contracts not renewed in 2009 represent less than 1% of Dalkia revenue in France.

·Major contracts lost in 2009 include the contract with Alstom Power Turbomachines DTV in Belfort. In addition, following the closure of its Etang de Berre site, Cabot France terminated early its thermoelectric power plant management contract, representing cumulative lost revenue for Dalkia over the contract term estimated at approximately €80 million.

On November 21, 2006, Dalkia2009 was also marked by the commissioning of the largest biomass power plant connected to a heating network in Cergy Pontoise (Val d’Oise) and OPAC inaugurated Cellia in Paris,the significant development of the heat distribution network business (creation, extension and renewal activities). Furthermore, the first fuel cell for public housing. From 2007, Cellia will contributegeneration of cogeneration installations that are about to providing heat and clean warm water to 283 OPAC housing units in Paris. With this project, Dalkia and OPAC in Paris will contribute to the research of eco-friendly solutions. The application of this innovative technology in the public housing sector is a first in Europe regarding its strength and technology (180 kW thermic and 230 kW electric).  


·

Furthermore, on January 1, 2006, Dalkia began the operation of a contract for a hospital center in Valenciennes, signed atreach the end of December 2005. This 15-yeartheir life and numerous contract which representsrenewals were recorded after complete overhaul of the equipment.

Finally, Dalkia signed its first energy performance contract, following the implementation of the “Grenelle 1” recommendations.

In Central Europe, commercial activities performed well. New contracts signed during the year (representing approximately €51 million of estimated cumulative revenuesrevenue) enabled Dalkia to maintain activity at 2008 levels and offset the negative impacts of €30 million, coversthe economic crisis and exchange rates. Some 80% of contracts expiring during the year were renewed.

Major contracts were also signed during the year in Mexico in the health sector, and in Italy and Portugal under public private partnerships. Conversely, the installation business suffered the full effects of the economic crisis in Spain, Portugal, Italy and Israel, reporting a large scopesignificant slowdown.

The main developments in North America concerned the acquisition of services, including the managementPortland cooling network and the acquisition of heating, ventilation, air conditioning, and sanitary warm water production, and steam production and electrical and technical maintenance.  NFL (National Football League) assets.



30



·

Dalkia first entered the Bulgarian market in August 2006, by acquiring 55% of the capital of KES, a Bulgarian energy saving company. Moreover, Dalkia won the call for tenders at the end of last year for the privatization of “Toploficacia Varna,” a company that produces and distributes heatBack to the city of Varna in Bulgaria.  Contents


·

In Israel, Dalkia won a contract for the operation of a co-generation plant of 82 Mwe in Ashkelon. This plant will supply electricity and thermal energy to the Ashkelon seawater desalination plant operated by Veolia Water on the Israeli coast. This 23-year contract represents for Dalkia consolidated revenues of €3.6 million per year. The co-generation plant will be linked to the seawater desalination plant and operational as of the second quarter of 2007.  


·

In China (Chongqing), Dalkia signed a contract, in May 2006, under which it will ensure the financing, construction and operation, as of November 2006, of the trigeneration plant that will provide air conditioning and heat for the Jiahe Yumao property program in Chongqing. The plant will serve a shopping center of 75,000 m² and a hotel of 35,000 m². The program includes six apartment buildings, a hotel, shopping center, office block and a tramway station, on a land plot of 65,000 m². This 20-year contract represents consolidated revenues of approximately €1 million per year.


·

In Canada, Dalkia, signed a partnership agreement with Gaz Metro for the creation of a corporate joint venture (joint venture with CDH Solutions s.e.c.) to develop a heating business network in Canada and to operate a heating and cooling distribution network in Montreal to serve 1.5 million m² in the center of Montreal (office blocks, shopping centers, hotels, train stations…).


In 2006, Dalkia renewed approximately 86% of its contracts due to expire during the fiscal year, including the maintenance contract for electricity pylons, antennae and other relays for the SFR network. Among those not renewed were contracts with Smurfit in Vernon, resulting from the closure of the site, and with Unibiens in Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines and the Centre National d’Art et de la Culture in Paris following their restructuring. In 2006, Dalkia lost contracts representing approximately 2% of its consolidated revenues.  


Principal Contracts in 20062009

The following table shows the principal contracts signed or renewed in 20062009 with either public authorities or industrial or commercial companies.1


1

Revenues expected under foreign contracts have been converted into euros at the rate of exchange prevailing on December 31, 2006. Accordingly, these amounts may differ from the amounts announced in earlier press releases.  




Back to contents






Public Authority

authority or

Company company and Locationlocation thereof

Month
of Signature signature
of Contract or of Renewalcontract

New Contract contract
or Renewalrenewal

Duration of Contract
term

Estimated Total Cumulative Revenue


cumulative
revenue
(in euros)

Services to be Providedprovided

France

Public/Local AuthoritiesFrance

     

Cergy-Pontoise and its suburbsMarne La Vallée/ Val Maubuée (77)

NovemberMay

Renewal

24 years



82 million

 Heating network using geothermal energy

City of Plaisir (78)

February

Extension

15 years

69 million

Heating network

City of Roubaix (59)

July

Renewal

24 years

196 million

Heating network

City of Belfort (90)

May

Renewal

12 years

22 million

Glacis du Château district heating network in Belfort

City of Ales (30)

October

New

1620 years

268.744 million

Management of public urban heating services.Heating network

Saint-Joseph Hospital
(Paris)
City of Lyon (69)

NovemberJune

NewRenewal

712 years

74.630 million

All technicalLa Duchère heating network

City of Poitiers (86)

July

Renewal

15 years

72 million

 Couronneries, Touffenet and hotel services, regarding the unifying project for the hospitalsSt Éloi district heating networks.

Construction of St Joseph, St Michel and Notre Dame du Bon Secours.a biomass-powered heating plant

City of Limoges (87)

February

Extension

10 years

154 million

Construction of a biomass-powered heating plant

SFR

July

Renewal

3 years

105 million

“Network life” maintenance contract – geographical extension

ManufacturersEurope (excl. France)

     

SPM (Berre)TERSA Tractament i Seleccio de Residus SA (Spain)

MarchDecember

New

11


30 years

41.1


492 million

Industrial utility supply contract with SPM, a subsidiary ofHeating and cooling network for the group Shell.  Marina district, Barcelona – Multi-energy (gas, biomass, photovoltaic)

Atomic Energy Commission (Saclay)City of Madrid (Spain)

MarchDecember

New

154 years

4822 million

Multi-technical services: renovation and construction for the sites thermic installations.Public lighting maintenance

ST Microelectronics (Grenoble)City of Hamburg (Germany)

September

New

2 10 years (renewable)

8.483 million

ManagementProduction and distribution of industrial utilities (warm water, steam, air conditioning, compressed air, demineralized water),heat generated using renewable energies for the runningHafenCity district

Santa Maria della misericordia University Hospital, Udine

(Italy)

October

New

30 years

394 million

Heating network and maintenance of electrical, heating, cooling equipment industrial equipment.facilities management and thermal and multi-technical services – hospital PPP

Rest of World
(outside France)

Public/Local AuthoritiesLatin America

     

PaikInjie University Hospital of Islan

(South Korea)Secretario de Salud del Estado de Mexico Zumpango (Mexico)

MayJuly

New

323 years

5.868 million

EnergyFacilities management of the installations.

Cona and Careggi Hospital

(Italy)

November1 and May

New

30 and 17 years

211 million

– hospital PPP contract for the construction and management of the Cona Hospital in Ferrara and the Careggi Hospital in Florence.



1

Official awarding of contract in May 2006.




Back to contents




Public Authority

or

Company and Location thereof

Month of Signature of Contract or of Renewal

New Contract or Renewal

Duration of Contract

Estimated Total Cumulative Revenue

(in euros)

Services to be Provided

Industrial and TertiaryNorth America

     

TM RetailVenetian Group

(United Kingdom)(USA)

MarchFebruary

NewRenewal

510 years

34.530 million

Multi-technical contract with the news agency TM Retail at 1,304 sites.

Vodafone

(United Kingdom)

April

New

5 years

43.5 million

Multi-technical contract on the global management of 78 Vodafone buildings, including its headquarters and several call centers.

Petrom

(Romania)

August

New

2 years

12 million

Contract with Petrobrazi (Petrom Group – OMV) for the supply of steam to oneO&M of the largest refineriesVenetian Casino in the Balkan region.

Malteries Peroni Saplo

(Italy)

August

New

9 years

30.8 million

The installation and operation by Siram of four co-generation plants (a total of 9 WMe), with a guarantee of availability and performance, for a consortium of 22 manufacturers in the Lazio and Latina regions.Las Vegas


1

Revenues expected under the contracts won in 2009 have been converted into euros at the closing exchange rate as of December 31, 2009 and represent the portion due to Dalkia, including Veolia Energy North America Holding, under such contracts. Accordingly, these amounts may differ from the amounts announced in earlier Group press releases.



31



Back to Contents


Acquisitions and Divestitures in 20062009


In 2006,2009, Dalkia made a numbercontinued its expansion in France and abroad, through acquisitions and major projects and, in particular, the acquisition of acquisitionsthe entire share capital of Digismart in ItalyEstonia in the first quarter.

In addition, activity in the United Kingdom was refocused on energy businesses, with the aim of developing its private and industrial utilities management client base. In Latin America, the Group purchased the EDF services business in Argentina and 30%divestiture of the capitalFacilities Management businesses of Dalkia Brasil, whichDETS and Pakersell. This transaction was held by Ticket Servicios, a subsidiary of Accorcompleted in Brazil.


At the end of 2006, the Group bought TDU in Australia, a company specialized in the distribution, installation, servicing and maintenance of heating systems, ventilation and air conditioning, with both private and public clients. TDU employs nearly 500 people and had consolidated revenues of €84 million in 2006.  


August 2009.

In total, over the course of 2006, Dalkia created2009, the Energy Services Division consolidated or purchased 45forty-seven companies, and sold, liquidated or merged 16twenty-nine companies. As a result, at December 31, 2006, Dalkiait held 417547 consolidated companies, including 206328 foreign companies.


companies, as of December 31, 2009, compared to a total of 528 consolidated companies as of December 31, 2008.

Transportation

Through our transportation division,Transportation Division, Veolia Transport, we are one of the world’sa leading private operatorsoperator of public ground transportation.transportation in Europe.1 Veolia Transport operates road and rail passenger transportation networks under contract withservices on behalf of national, regional and local transit authorities. Veolia Transport has

We have been managing and operating urban, regional and inter-regional road and rail networks and maritime transport for more than a century, having won itsour first tramway concessions at the end of the 19th19th century.

Veolia Transport estimates that the portion of the worldwide transportation market presentlycurrently represents revenue of €340 billion, of which only 31%, or approximately €105 billion, is currently open to competition stands at €70 billion,competition. Europe and North America are expected to account for nearly two-thirds of the growth potential over the next five years, with market expansion that could be significant between 2010 and 2015. Asia, particularly China, accounts for a substantial portion of new emerging markets and the portion not yet open to competition (thereby offering development potential) stands at €390 billion. Thecurrent opening of transportation markets that has occurred over the past several years has been particularly pronounced in Europe, but has occurred on other continents as well.is evidenced by a recent wave of calls for tender.

Moreover, the worldwideglobal trend of population movement towards urban areasgreater urbanization automatically increases the need for collectivemass transportation services, therebythus strengthening the market potential ofin areas that we seek to service. Veolia Transport, seeksalongside the other Divisions of the Group, represents a major and steady contributor to service.our integrated environmental services offering.

At the endAs of 2006,December 31, 2009, Veolia TransportationTransport had approximately 81,90077,591 employees around the world.  It hasworld and a presence in 30 countries, andmore than twenty-seven countries. It conducts its activitybusiness mainly in Europe, North America and Australia.Asia. While continuing to strengthen its position in France and the French overseas departments and territories, Veolia Transportation benefits fromTransport also has a strong presence outside of France, as well, where it earns approximately 60.5%60% of its revenues.revenue. In 2006,2009, Veolia Transport pursued developmentcontinued its growth in North America, Asia and Europe.

Veolia Transport estimates that it provided transportation to approximately 2.5 billion travelers in 2006, and that it managed contracts with approximately 5,000 public authorities.




Back to contents



The following table shows the consolidated revenue (revenue from ordinary activities under IFRS) and operating income of our transportation operations in each of the last two fiscal years,Transportation Division, after elimination of all inter-company transactions.

(in millions of euros)

2006

2005
adjusted**

Change

2006/2005

    

Revenue*

4,951.5

4,223.9

17.2%

Operating income

13.6

116.8

-88.3%

*

Revenue from ordinary activities under IFRS.

**

Accounts as of December 31, 2005 were adjusted so as to ensure the comparability of the fiscal years in accordance with IFRIC12 standards for the treatment of concessions.  Revenues and operating income of Veolia Transport in Denmark were accounted for in 2006 under IFRS5 as discontinued operations.

Transportation*

(in millions of euro)

2009

2008

Change
2009/2008

    

Revenue

5,860.7

5,788.1

+1.3%

Operating income**

152.9

170.5

-10.3%

*

In accordance with IFRS 5, Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations, the results of operations of the Freight business entities in the Transportation Division, divested in December 2009, and UK Transportation activities in the process of divestiture in December 2009, are grouped together in a separate line, Net income from discontinued operations, in the 2009 financial statements.

**

The 2008 figure includes badwill resulting from our purchase of minority interests in SNCM. See “Item 5 Operating and Financial Review and Prospects”, below.


1

Sources: annual reports of main competitors and internal studies.



32



Back to Contents



Overview of Transportation


Veolia Transport primarilymainly operates road and rail passenger transportation networks under contracts won through auctionand regular services in accordance with various public authorities. The public authorities with which Veolia Transport contracts generally own the heavy infrastructure. Veolia Transport uses and typically establishservice specifications (covering schedules, routes and fare structures forstructures) set by the networks that Veolia Transport operates and manages. competent public authorities, who generally retain ownership of the infrastructure. Contracts are awarded following public tenders.

Veolia Transport primarily conducts its business through the outsourced management of transportation activities, under conditions and structures that differ from one country to another due to varying legal and regulatory requirements. Each contractThe relationship between athe public authority and Veolia Transport determines the relationships between the two parties, including payment to Veolia Transport andtransportation company is governed by fixed-term contracts that determine the risks to be borne by each party and typically lasts for a set period.  Becausethe remuneration of the transportation company. Given that the fares charged by Veolia Transport chargesto passengers on its transportation networks are usually insuffic ientgenerally insufficient to cover its costs, the public authority typically provides Veolia Transport with a payment or other compensation for services rendered. Moreover, in the case of certain contracts, Veolia Transport is paid a flat fee for its transportation services;services and consequently it does not bear the risks associated with lower receipts or decreaseddec reased passenger use (such contracts beingare referred to as “Public Market” contracts in France).  Veolia Transport’s management

Management contracts generally last from 2have a term of two to 12twelve years, except for those that takewith the formexception of “operating concessions”,concessions,” which last approximatelyhave an average term of 30 years on average.


years.

Veolia Transport’s activities can be broken downfall into four principalmain categories: (i) city

urban mass transportation (urban,(suburban and urban beltwaytransport, and other supplementaryspecific transportation services), (ii) ;

intercity and regional transportation, (iii) transportation;

infrastructure management and airport services;

transportation management (passenger information services, clearinghouses, central telephone operator),clearing-houses, call centers).

The activities of the Transportation Division are influenced by key factors of a technical, contractual and (iv) industrial markets.economic nature, including primarily:


Citymanaging contractual risks: we exercise our activity under long-term contracts, which may hinder our ability to react rapidly and appropriately to new, financially unfavorable situations (see Risk Factors above);

managing the various aspects of sustainable-development policy, which are increasingly included in transportation authority requirements (see Risk Factors and Environmental Regulations Policies and Compliance above);

the ability to control contractual changes (see Risk Factors above);

the ability to carry out our activities in densely-populated, vast and increasingly complex areas, which entails increasing operating complexity and a greater need for inter-modality.

Urban Mass Transportation


Veolia Transport operates a number of bus networks, suburban trains, tramways and metros, and provides customized transportation services as well.transportation-on-demand services. Veolia Transport is either partially or fully responsible for designing, planning and operating services, managing personnel, inspecting vehiclesproviding drivers and stations it uses in its networks (including obtaining various permits), conductingticket inspectors, marketing efforts and managing customer service.


service, as well as the maintenance, cleanliness and security of vehicles and network stations.

In many urban areas, Veolia Transport provides interconnected bus, tramway, metro and train transportation services through a ticketing system coordinated by the principal transportation provider or transportation authority for a region.authority. Veolia Transport also offers special integrated transportation services withinin urban areas where the networks are managed by several different operators in an urban area, including, particularly,at once, such as Stockholm, Sydney, Düsseldorf and the suburbs of Paris, Bordeaux, Stockholm, Sydney and Düsseldorf.Paris.


In various urban areas, Veolia Transport also operates ferry services to complementin tandem with its bus services. This is notably the case of services in various urban areas.  It does soprovided in Toulon (France)harbor and Göteborg (Sweden), for example.services to the Morbihan islands in France, as well as services provided in the Netherlands and in Sweden.



33



Back to Contents


Urban and Urban BeltwaySuburban Transportation


In France, Veolia Transport operates the tramways,tramway, bus networks and light rail networks in Rouen, Saint-Etienne, Nancy and Bordeaux.Nice. In addition, during 2009, Veolia Transport iswas awarded the contract for the operation of the existing network in Valenciennes, composed of a tramway line and the planned construction of a trolleybus public transport line. The contract for the operation of the suburban network in the Aix area was also the operator of therenewed. Veolia Transport also manages bus networks in Nice, Toulon (where tramway infrastructure is currently being installed as well) and approximately 40 othersome forty French cities.

Veolia Transport has a strong presence in the Ile-de-FranceGreater Paris region, where it operates numerous bus lines.lines in the intermediate suburbs of Paris and the greater metropolitan area. It is the main private operator in the region, operating the bus networks of Melun, Rambouillet, Argenteuil, St. Germain-en-Laye and Seine-Saint-Denis.


Seine-Saint-Denis in addition to several highway express routes.

In Northern and Central Europe, Veolia Transport operates tramwaystramway, metro and light rail networks in Görlitz and Berlin (Germany), Dublin (Ireland), Trondheim (Norway) and Norrköping (Sweden). It also operates bus routes in Scandinavia, Switzerland, Belgium, the Czech Republic and Stockholm (Sweden).several cities in Poland. In the Netherlands, in addition to regional transport in the Hague, Veolia Transport also began operating the bus network serving this city’s suburbs in 2009. Veolia Transport also operates all integrated (inter-modal) public transport networks in Limburg province (bus, transportation-on-demand, suburban rail transportation).

In Southern Europe, via its subsidiary FCC-Connex, a joint venture with the Stockholm metro, as well as bus lines in Scandinavia, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Czech Republic, and numerous cities in Poland.


Spanish group FCC, Veolia Transport operates the Bilbao network and manages urban transportation services in several other cities, including the Barcelona tramway. In Morocco, a delegated bus service concession arrangement covering the towns of Rabat, Sale and Temara in SpainMorocco was signed on February 26, 2009 and Portugal through FCC Connex Corporación SL, which is jointly-owned by Veolia Transport and CGT (acame into effect in November 2009. The operation of this fifteen-year contract was entrusted to STAREO, a subsidiary of FCC).  Through this entity, Veolia Transport operates the Barcelona tramway and the urban transport network for the city of Pampelune. It is also a 10% shareholder of the company that was awarded the concession for the direct operation of the tramway in Parla (in the suburbs of Madrid).


Transport.

In the United States, Veolia Transport provides bus transportation services principally in California, Arizona, Nevada (Las Vegas), Colorado, Texas and Maryland and Virginia. Veolia Transport and its partners in the Massachusetts Bay Commuter Railroad Company (the Bombardier groupcities of Las Vegas, New Orleans and a local partner, ACI) manage suburban trainsSeattle, as well as in the Boston area.Washington DC region. Veolia Transport also manages suburban trains in Los Angeles (Metrolink).





Back to contents



In Canada, Veolia Transport provides transportationtrain services in the south suburbs of Montreal, as well as bus services in York (Ontario).


Boston, San Diego and Miami. In Austin, Texas, it also operates rail freight services.

In Australia, Veolia Transport operates the entire suburban rail network of Melbourne as well as theSydney monorail and light rail network of Sydney.  It also operatesand bus services in Perth, Brisbane and Sydney. In New Zealand, Veolia Transport operates trainsregional train services around Auckland. In Asia, Veolia Transport operates the bus networks of five cities in the suburbs of Auckland.


Jiangsu and Anhui Chinese provinces, as well as the Hong Kong tramway. In Korea, Veolia Transport began operating the Seoul metro line 9 in July 2009. In the rest of the world, Veolia Transport operates, through partnershippartnerships with other operators, a high-frequency right-of-way bus system (BRT: Bus Rapid Transit) in BogotaBogotá (Colombia), and a network of bus lines in Santiago, Chile. In Israel, in Chileaddition to the three urban bus networks and inter-city bus lines in Israel and Lebanon. In Jerusalem, Israel,already managed, Veolia Transport is also part ofwon the consortium that has been awarded the concessioncontract for the operating of a future tramway.


Lod urban network in March 2009. This contract began operations on January 1, 2010 .

SupplementaryOther Transport Services


(transportation-on-demand, para-transit, taxis, etc.)

Veolia Transport offers innovative transportation services in certain cities that supplement traditional transportation networks. For example, in France, Veolia Transport offers Créabus, an on-demand minibus service that is tracked by a Global Positioning System, or GPS, which operates in France in Dieppe, Montluçon, Vierzon, Bourges, Bordeaux, Ile-de-France andthe Greater Paris region, as well as in Fairfax, Viginia (United States).  Veolia Transport also manages all of the on-demand transportation

Several contract wins in 2009 further strengthened transportation-on-demand services in the Nord Brabant regionUnited States. These include the following: all transportation-on-demand airport services in Raleigh-Durham, North Carolina (starting March 1, 2009), student transportation to the Stanford University campus (starting September 1, 2009) and transportation of the Netherlands.


Continental Airlines employees to Newark airport (starting October 1, 2009).

Veolia Transport manages taxi services in the Netherlands and the United States, in particularnotably in Baltimore Maryland, Denver Colorado, Kansas City Missouri, and Denver.Pittsburg Pennsylvania (USA) as well as in the Netherlands, France and Sweden. It provides transport for persons with reduced mobility in Bordeaux and other regions of France in Canada and in the United States (“paratransit”),(para-transit) particularly in particular California, Arizona, Nevada, Texas, Maryland, South Carolina, New Orleans and South Carolina.the Washington DC area.

In addition, since 2009, via its specialist subsidiary, Veloway, Veolia Transport has operated self-service bike rental systems in the city of Vannes and Greater Nice.



34



Back to Contents


Intercity and Regional Transportation


Veolia Transport provides regional transportation services through the operation of road and rail networks. As with urban transportation services, Veolia Transport is responsible for designing, planning, operating and maintaining the network and stations. It is also charged with providing security personnel, ticketing personnel and providing security on the vehicles and stations it uses in its regional networks, as well as for ticket sales and customer service.


In France, Veolia Transport has a strong presence in the intercity and studentschool transportation markets, involving more than 60 French departments acrossmarkets. Veolia Transport is present in all regions of France and saw the country.renewal of intercity and school transportation contracts in the Gard, Moselle, Var, Sarthe, Orne and Cher regions. Veolia Transport also operates a number of regional rail networks, covering approximately 850300 kilometers, through contracts with regional public authorities or(notably in the Provence-Alpes-Côte-d’Azur region) and through sub-contracts with the Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer (SNCF), the French national railroad company, particularlySNCF (notably in the regions of Brittany, Provence, the Alps and the French Riviera.  Brittany).


In Europe, Veolia Transport has a strong presence in Germany, Denmark, the United Kingdom, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Slovenia, Slovakia, Belgium, Spain, the Czech Republic, the Netherlands and, since the end of 2006, Serbia and Croatia. Through its subsidiary, Eurolines, Veolia Transport provides transport by motorcoachmotor coach on regular international routes serving 1,470over 1,500 cities throughout Europe.


Since the opening of the Swedish market to competition in 2009, Veolia Transport operates a rail network between Stockholm and Malmö. Veolia Transport has a strong presence in Germany, with over 2,500 kilometers of regional railway lines. Veolia Transport continues to develop ferry transport servicetransportation services in areas such as Finnmark and Norrland (Norway) and, Zeeland province (Netherlands) and Gothenburg (Sweden), as well as through its 28%66% shareholding in theSociété Nationale Maritime Corse Méditerranée (SNCM), which manages passenger and freight maritime transportation services between Marseille, Nice, Corsica and North Africa.


In the rail transportation sector in the United States, Veolia Transport is a shareholder of SNCM along with Butler Capital Partners (38%)operates suburban networks in Boston and Los Angeles, the Sprinter network in South Los Angeles and the French State (25%)Miami suburban network (Tri-Rail).  SNCM is fully consolidated

Hub management and airport services

Management of airport infrastructure

After entering the airport management market in our consolidated financial statements. This consolidation method has been analyzed under norm IAS27 and reflects2007 with the rules of governance of SNCM. Specifically,management contract for the Nimes-Garons Airport, Veolia Transport appointscurrently operates, maintains, and manages the two largest regional airports in France: Beauvais and Lille-Lesquin. These operations are carried out in partnership with the Oise Chamber of Commerce and Industry (for Nimes-Garons), and the Greater Lille Chamber of Commerce and Industry and SANEF (for Lille-Lesquin).

In December 2008, the Greater Lille Chamber of Commerce and Industry was chosen to continue managing and operating the regional airport hub with Veolia Environnement and SANEF though a company that is 34% owned by Veolia Environnement.

In both Beauvais and Lille, the competencies of all of our Divisions are brought to bear in the memberscontext of ambitious environmental programs: recycling, waste-to-energy conversion for non-recyclables, air-quality preservation, optimized water and energy consumption, planned solar-panel farms in Lille, and diversified transport options (shuttle-buses, transport-on-demand, etc).

Airport Groundhandling Services

This business covers a wide range of services for airlines in the Management Board (directoire)airport zone, such as the transportation of SNCM, has broad operationalfreight, baggage handling, maintenance of and financial management powersfuel distribution to vehicles, assistance to aircraft on stop-over, and exercises control over SNCM withinall “runway” and “traffic” activities relating to aircraft departures and arrivals. These services are currently primarily offered at the meaning of IFRS.Roissy-Charles-de-Gaulle hub through our subsidiary, VE Airport. Veolia Transport also manages airline passenger transportation services inside airports.

Passenger Information Services

35



Back to Contents


Transportation Management

Growth in Veolia Transport’s businessbusinesses also depends on increased use of public transportation networks, which is in turn is closely relatedlinked to the quality of service provided by these networks. To increase passenger usage of

Veolia Transport focuses its networks, Veolia Transport’s efforts focus on adequately matching service offerings with demand, for these services, and developing localpassenger information services relating to transportation systems for travelers.


Accordingly,services. For this purpose, Veolia Transport has developed the “Optio”, a comprehensive passenger information system a service that provides anyone who wants to use public transport(call center, Internet, text messages and WAP) covering all transportation networks in a region (regardless of the operator) with the information that they need.  The service involves use of a central telephone operator, internet site, wireless text messages, such as SMS, and wireless internet access, such as WAP. The “Optio”. This system currently operates in the departmentFrench departments of Oise in France.


and Isère. In addition, Veolia Transport has developed “Connector Plus”, a real-time information system installed in the rail network of Melbourne (Australia), which notifies users of service interruptions or delays through wireless text messages on their mobile phones. Veolia Transport has also installed the “Connector Plus” system in Stockholm.


Veolia Transport has also recently created several internet sites in France and Australia that allow users to findprepare their itineraries onusing local transportation systems in France and Australia.





Back to contents



Industrial Markets


Beyond the personnel transport services provided by numerous subsidiaries in France and the rest of Europe, Veolia Transport is present in two areas of industrial activity which represent nearly 4% of its revenues: rail transport (freight transport and management of industrial rail junctions with related logistics) and airport services.


Rail Transport


The activities in this sector are carried out in Europe through Veolia Cargo, assisted supported by specialized, national subsidiaries in France, Germany and the Netherlands.


In the area of freight transport, Veolia Transport operates a number of regional and international freight trains in France, and offers rail transport services for long distance freight in Germany.  2006 was marked by the inititation of Veolia Cargo’s business in the Netherlands and the reinforcement of its position in Germany as the top private competitive operator of the DeutscheBahn.


In the area of industrial rail junctions and related logistics, Veolia Cargo, through its subsidiaries in France and Germany, manages junctions for large industrial customers (in particular in the steel and refining industries) with factories that are linked to a national rail network.


Airport Services


This activity covers a range of services to airlines (freight transport at Charles de Gaulle airport, baggage handling, maintenance of vehicles, etc.). It is conducted by VE Airport, 60% of the share capital of which is owned by Veolia Transport. Veolia Transport also manages transport services within airports for airline passengers.


Veolia Transport intends to develop its industrial market activities by relying on Veolia Environnement’s existing client network.  It will focus in particular on those industrial market activities that will help to enrich the Group’s offerings and constitute a growth area for Veolia Transport.


systems.

Description of Activities in 20062009


Veolia Transport’s revenues increased by 17.2% in 2006In 2009, the Transportation Division reported modest revenue growth compared to 2005, due to strong growth in2008.

In the areas of urban and intercity transport abroad resulting from recent developments in Europe and particularly in the United Kingdom (acquisition of Dunn-Line PLC), marking the return oftransportation sector, Veolia Transport instrengthened its presence during 2009, by winning the country, and in the United States (acquisition of SuperShuttle International in October 2006).  


Despite the loss of a contract involving the operation of part of a network of bus lines in Stockholm, Veolia Transport renewed or won a large number of medium-sized contracts in 2006 as well as in France, including relating to the towns of Valence, Menton, Roanne and Arcachon and their suburbs, Europe, the United States, and Asia. The following were some of the highlights of 2006:


·

In France, in the Languedoc Roussillon region, Veolia Transport won a contract for the operation of the existing Valenciennes network composed of one tramway line and the planned construction of a future second trolleybus public areas attransport line. Veolia Transport also won contracts for the airport in Nîmes. The five-year contract was signed on December 19, 2006 and will be effective as from January 2007. It is expected to create annual revenues on the order of €5 million. This project represents a new air transportation infrastructure management business for our group, with the overall operation of the Montceau-Le-Creusot and Louviers-Val de Reuil networks. Veolia Transport was also awarded a site accommodating 250,000 travelers per year.


public service delegation contract for the construction and operation of the infrastructure and shuttle service for Mont Saint Michel, as well as the Mobility Center set-up by the Alsace Regional Council. In the intercity and school transportation sector Veolia Transport renewed its contracts in the Gard, Moselle, Var, Sarthe, Orne and Cher regions. Finally, in January 2009 Veloway, a subsidiary of Veolia Transport, was awarded a contract by the City of Ni ce to set-up and manage a self-service bike rental system. This contract is composed of several firm and optional tranches and concerns the set-up of 120 bike stations and the supply of nearly 1,200 bikes.

Veolia Transport also signedstrengthened its firstpresence in the United States by winning and renewing several contracts, including an operating contract relating to the internal French rail market with the O-I group, a world leaderfor all urban transportation systems in bottle manufacturing, which became effective in July 2006. Its cumulative revenues are estimated at €13.5 million over 5 years. Thus, Veolia Transport is the first private operator to take advantage of the opening of the French domestic market, effective since March 31, 2006.


·

New Orleans. In the Netherlands, Veolia Transport wonhas operated the callbus network for tender issued bysuburbs of the Limbourg province forHague since 2009, using environmentally-friendly vehicles (CNG buses). Veolia Transport continues its expansion in Asia including the operation of the integrated public transportation network of the south, north and center of the region (train, bus, and taxi). The ten-year contract, signedSeoul metro line 9 in December 2006, will mobilize 1,025 employees, 242 buses and 26 trains. Its cumulative revenues should amount to €1.1 billion.Korea begun in July 2009.


·

In Germany, Veolia Transport won a contract for rail transport service for travelers inrenewed 74% of all major contracts, which expired during the townyear, representing combined estimated annual revenue of Augsburg in€260 million. However, Veolia Transport lost the Munich region in Bavaria.  The eleven-year contract was signed in October 2006, and providesoperating contracts for the operationMelbourne train service, the Stockholm metro and the Bordeaux urban network. These contracts represented combined estimated annual revenue of three rail lines mobilizing 80 employees. Its cumulative revenues are estimated at €286.4€791 million.


·

In the United States, Veolia Transport Inc. signed a five-year contract in June 2006, for the operation of an urban bus network in San Diego, California. This contract, which will take effect in January 2007, will mobilize about 620 employees and 380 buses. Its cumulative revenues should amount to €167.2 million.


·

In India, following an international call for tenders for the construction for the first subway line in Mumbai, a contract was awarded in June 2006 to the “Mumbai Metro One” consortium, consisting of the Indian company Reliance (69%), Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Development Authority (MMRDA) (26%) and Veolia Transport (5%). The line should be operational as of 2010. The operation and maintenance of the line will be undertaken by a subsidiary subcontracted by the consortium, 70% of which will be held by Veolia Transport. The 35-year operating contract represents estimated cumulative revenues of €53 million for Veolia Transport.


In 2006, Veolia Transport also pursued its growth in Eastern and South-Eastern Europe (Croatia and Serbia).  




36



Back to contentsContents



Principal Contracts in 2009

The following table shows the principalmajor contracts signed or renewed in 20062009 with either public authorities or industrial or commercialservice sector companies.1

Public Authority

authority or

Company company and Locationlocation thereof

Month of Signaturesignature of Contract or of Renewalcontract

New Contract
contract or Renewal

Duration of Contract


renewal

Contract
term

Estimated Total Cumulative Revenuecumulative revenue

(in euros)

Services to be Provided

France

Marseille

July

New

8 years

145 million

Operation of tramway network for Marseille.

Valence

May

New

6 years

76 million

Operation of urban bus network for the metropolitan area of Valence.provided

Europe
(outside France)France

     

GermanyGard Department

AugustJuly

NewRenewal

10 years

170160 million

Urban public transportation network for PforzheimManagement and operation of all regular lines and school routes in the Bade-Wurtemberg Land.Gard Department

GermanyMoselle Department

August

Renewal

10 years

177 million 

Regular coach passenger transport routes in the Moselle Department

Mont Saint Michel

October

New

1113 years

286.491 million

Rail services inConstruction and operation of infrastructure and welcome facilities and passenger transport by shuttle bus between Mont Saint Michel and the Bavière (Augsburg) Land.bus station

NetherlandsValenciennes

DecemberNovember

New

108 years

1.1 billion404.8 million

Operation of integrated public transportationthe Valenciennes urban network in the province(tramway and construction of Limbourg.a future trolleybus line)

North AmericaEurope (excl. France)

     

Landskrona / Relleborg (Sweden)

June

New

8 years

(plus 2 years at the customer’s option)

94.1 million

Operation of the City of Landskrona urban transportation network


Boräs (Sweden)

October

New

8 years

(plus 2 years at the customer’s option)

67.7 million

Operation of the Sjuhärad region urban transportation network

Troms Ferries (Norway)

March

New

10 years

115 million

Maritime transportation of passengers by ferry


Regiotaxi West-Brabant (Netherlands)

July

Renewal

4 years

(plus 2 years at the customer’s option)

72 million 

Operation of the urban transportation network of Brabant province and neighboring communes

Orange CountyNorth America

Tempe, Arizona

April

Renewal

4 years and 2 months (plus 4 years at the customer’s option)

94.7 million

Operation of regular bus passenger transportation routes and maintenance services

New Orleans, Louisiana

July

New

5 years

(plus 5 years at the customer’s option)

202.4 million

Management, operation and maintenance of all urban passenger transportation systems of the city of New Orleans (turnkey contract)

North Africa

Rabat (Morocco)

February

New

315 years

(plus 7 years at the customer’s option)

73.11,095.7 million

Operation of a public transportation network (bus and paratransit).

San Diego (U.S.)

September

New / partial Renewal

5 years

167.2 million

Operationsuburban bus routes around the city of an urban and beltway urban public transportation bus network.

Mesa

March

New

6 years

122.9 million

Urban and customized transportation in Phoenix, Arizona.Rabat


Acquisitions and Divestitures in 2006

In July 2006, Veolia Transport and CMA-CGM partnered to develop new rail transportation between principal ports and economic regions in Europe. This alliance emerged, with European competition authorities’ agreement, from the creation of two distinct, operational companies in December 2006: a combined transportation operator, “Rail Link Europe,” in charge of organizing and marketing sea freight container transport (held 49% by Veolia Cargo, and 51% by Rail Link), and a rail company, “Veolia Cargo Link” (held 51% by Veolia Cargo, and 49% by Rail Link), uniting industrial means and providing rail transportation of these containers. In December 2006, the first line was opened between France and Germany.

In May 2006, at the end of the process of privatization of theSociété Nationale Maritime Corse Méditerranée (SNCM), Veolia Transport acquired 28% of the company’s share capital and currently retains management of operations. SNCM’s principal business is the operation of a service concession to provide ferry service to Corsica from the port of Marseille. It holds ten vessels, and its contribution to the revenues of Veolia Transport was approximately €200 million in 2006.

1

Revenues ofexpected under the contracts won in 2009 have been converted into euros at the closing exchange rate as of exchange prevailing on December 31, 20062009 and represent the portion due to Veolia PropretéTransport under such contracts. Accordingly, these amounts may differ from the amounts announced in our groups’earlier Group press releases.



37





Back to contentsContents



Acquisitions and Divestitures in 2009

In May 2006, the European Bank for the Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) obtained a 35% shareholding inFrance, Veolia Transport Central Europe Gmbh, combiningsold all its shares in its specialist freight rail-transport subsidiary, Veolia Transport’s business in Central and Eastern Europe. This alliance is expectedCargo (including this company’s foreign subsidiaries), to enableTFH (Geodis Group) on November 30, 2009. At the same time, Veolia Cargo sold its French subsidiaries to Eurotunnel Group. Veolia Transport to accelerate its growth inreceived total consideration for these new markets and to establish a strong presence in countries where the EBRD can offer its expertise and experience.

In January 2006, in the United States, Veolia Transport’s North American subsidiary acquired Shuttleport, specialized in the servicingtransactions of airports, city-centers and car-rental lots. The company comprises 761 employees and its revenues in 2006 were €45.4€103 million. In addition, SNCM, a subsidiary of Veolia Transport, sold its 45% stake in October,CMN on December 1, 2009 for total consideration of €45 million.

Veolia Transport strengthened its activities in Asia, primarily through its joint venture with RATP Développement, which is active in China, Korea and India. In April 2009, Veolia Transport acquired SuperShuttle, one ofa 50% stake in Hong Kong Tramways and commenced operating the world leaders in customized airport transportation insole Hong Kong tramway. In the United States. Equipped with 1,200 vehicles, SuperShuttle provides service to 23 airports in 17 US cities. The company has 765 employees and transports about 6 million passengers each year. Its revenues in 2006 were €56.9 million.

In total, over the course of 2006,Kingdom, Veolia Transport created or purchased 85 companies, merged 20 companies, sold one companyrationalized its structure by grouping together in two single entities all transportation activities, in England, as Veolia Transport England plc and, liquidated 8. Atin Wales, as Veolia Transport Cymru plc.

Finally, Veolia Environnement entered into discussions with Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations regarding the combination of Veolia Transport and Transdev, to create a global leader in collective passenger transportation and sustainable mobility.

As of December 31, 2006,2009, Veolia Transport held 520was composed of 521 consolidated companies, (comparedcompared to 455 in 2005).549 as of December 31, 2008. During the year, twenty-nine companies were consolidated for the first time, twenty-nine companies were merged and twenty-eight companies were liquidated or sold.

Development of Synergies: Multiservice Contracts
to Benefit Industrial and Commercial Services Clients

Outsourcing and Multiservices Market

We believe that ourOver several years we have forged a position in the environmentalindustrial services market for industrial and, commercial customers has allowedmore recently, in the public and private service sector market, which reflects the synergies between our four Divisions. These enable us to take advantageprovide management services covering a wide range of the synergies that exist among our four divisions. The growthservices. Growth in this market estimated to be greater than 10% per year, was initiallyis primarily driven by the developmentexpansion of outsourcing, as industrial companies soughtseek to outsourceconfer the management of certain peripheral activities ancillary to externaltheir core businesses to third party service providers.

This outsourcing trend covers allapplies to several of our businesses, including energy services, water services, waste management services, on-site management of rail junctionsthe water cycle, waste processing and rail freight transport.

recovery and on-site logistics management. We offer a “multiservices”“multi-service” alternative to our customers, which involves the provision of services by several of our divisionsDivisions under a single contract. This allowsoption enables us to better respond tosatisfy the expectations of certain customers who wish to outsource a range of services to a single service provider.

From an operational standpoint, the customer relationship changes: the service provider becomes the customer’s sole contact and a dialogue develops to seek solutions which satisfy the interests of both parties. This relationshipapproach also allows for greater technical synergies, economies of scale and mutual commercial complementarity.benefits.

Our largest multiservicesmulti-service contract signed in 2003 with PSA Peugeot Citroën, providesis a good illustrationexample of the synergiesthese synergies. The subsidiary that are possible.  The subsidiarywas created to service this contract, Société d’Environnement et de Services de l’Est, manages all environmental services at Peugeot’s sites in easternEastern France, involvingwhich involves more than twenty different activities. By delegatingentrusting us with such a broad range of activities, to us, PSA Peugeot Citroën is able to ensure the regulatory compliance ofthat its sites comply with environmental regulations while realizingachieving significant cost savings. These savings largelyare mainly the result fromof an overhaul of the previous organization and work plan, the implementation of skillskills training programs, the reassumed managementtaking over of activities that were previously subcontracted, and the implementation of a new energy policy. In 2005, the economic and operational success of this partnership led the PSAP SA group to g rant to usseek the same perimeterscope of services forfrom us at its new facility in Trnava (Slovakia).

Our OrganizationOrganizational Structure for the Provision of Multiservices

ToIn order to develop this multiservicesmulti-service activity, we have establishedset up a specific organization, VE Industries (“VEI”),structure to coordinate our various activities.  While VEI plays a coordinating role,these activities without replacing the Divisions, each of our divisionswhich remains responsible for the ultimate performance of services falling within its area of expertise.

VEI preparesThe project structure Veolia Environnement Industries (“VEI”) manages our bids for multiservice contracts, withand a project manager from VEI is appointed for each multiservicesmulti-service contract. Commercial projects and bids are prepared in coordination with the collaboration of our divisions,Divisions, and are then submitted toreviewed by a commitments committee before their submissionbeing presented to clients.

Later,customers. The contract performance may be entrusted tois then performed by a dedicated, special purpose company formedentity managed in part by the divisionsDivisions involved in the project, particularlyespecially when we decideour personnel is outsourced to utilize the personnel of one of our industrial clients.customer.



38



Back to Contents


Multiservices Business Activity

Our activities withinin the multiservicesmulti-service market are principally organized around elevenprimarily consist of approximately fifteen major contracts, which together generate revenuesaverage annual revenue of more than €440€420 million annually and are expectedestimated to generate totalcumulative revenue over the lifetheir term of such contracts estimated at over €1.9around €2.7 billion. The average length of these contractscontract term is seventen years.

The multiservices market hasMulti-service activities have a strong international dimension, in particular with respect to ourparticularly when industrial clients, such ascustomers invest abroad involving the construction of new factories (so called “Greenfield” sites). This is notably the case for Arcelor in Brazil, and PSA Peugeot Citroën in Trnava (Slovakia) and La Seda de Barcelona in Sines (Portugal).

Through our subsidiary VEI, we signed a cooperation agreement with DCNS Group in March 2009 forming a joint venture, Défense Environnement Services (DES), in which have soughtwe hold a 51% stake. DES will manage outsourcing contracts for the provision of support services to construct new plants outsideDefense sites, set-up by the French State as part of France.the General Public Policy Review. The first project in this sector is at the Creil defense base and DES made the final three-candidate short-list for the competitive tender organized by the Defense Ministry. DES also signed a multi-service contract with DCNS in 2009 covering support services for its sites. This contract kicked-off in April of 2009 on a limited basis in Brest and then in June 2009 in Lorient and Indret. This activity has generated revenue of approximately €2 million, representing annualized revenue of approximately €3.5 million. In the lon g-run, activity at the DCNS sites is estimated to generate annual revenue of €15 million.

In 2006,2009, PSA Peugeot Citroën entrusted the most significant multiserviceconstruction of a parking garage and its fitting-out with solar panels at the Sochaux site to the Eolfi Sense partnership. This contract is the first to be won following a team effort involving Veolia’s dedicated subsidiary Eolfi, and the Sense Studies and Development team.The car parking garage, containing 801 spaces, will be delivered in September 2010 for use by PSA Peugeot Citroën employees at the Sochaux site. 4,800 solar panels will be installed on the canopy roofs, providing approximately 1.2 million kilowatts per annum into the French electricity network, equivalent to the annual consumption of 377 households or 1,550 individuals. This parking garage is a major industrial project and forms part of the sustainable development strategy of the customer. It represents an integrated approach, from the design of installatio ns to their operation over the next twenty years, including construction of the infrastructure. The construction work represents a cost of €5 million and is expected to be completed in mid-2010. The installation will generate annual revenue under the established scheme of approximately €150,000.

We also kicked off a partnership with Syngenta, the world leader in agrochemicals, entrusting us with the multi-service operation of several Syngenta sites in Europe. We kicked-off this partnership in France with two product formulation and distribution sites in Saint-Pierre in Haute-Normandy (Eure) and Aigues-vives in Languedoc-Roussillon (Gard), with operations commencing in July 2008 and January 2009, respectively. Our services cover a very broad scope, including utilities supervision and maintenance (energy and water), maintenance of buildings and outside areas, storehouse logistics, comprehensive waste management, cleaning and various services for building occupants (safety, management of work uniforms, archiving, etc.). Improving the environmental performance of the sites is an integral part of the services provided. The operation of these two sites over the planned five-year period represents estimated cumulative revenue in excess of €15 million.

A multi-service contract with Novartis was renewed for seven years in December 2007. It relates to the pharmaceutical group’s site in Basel (Switzerland), where we renovated and took over in 2008 the operation of what is today the largest waste incinerator in Switzerland. In addition, a twenty-year contract was signed in FranceDecember 2008 with Renault and involves the management of general and environmental services of allindustrial departments of the automobile construction sites inCity of Basle (IWB) for the Paris region (Boulogne-Billancourt, Guyancourt and Reuil-Malmaison). For this five-year contract, we will draw uponrecovery of “inevitable” energy produced by the expertise of our Energy, Environmental Services and Transportation divisionsincinerator to providefeed a wide range of servicesheating network for 1 million m² of real estate on which Renault employs more than 20,000 people. This contract aims to reduce expenditures by 20%. The range of services includes the management of electrical, heating and air conditioning technical equipment, management and disposal of waste, management of open spaces and developed sites, logistics and transportation (management of all employee vehicles and their garages, management of the stock supply, transport of mail, etc.) as well as commercial services (the recepti on of visitors). This is the most significant contract that we have signed to date concerning commercial sites. It represents consolidated revenues of €600 million.  





Back to contents



a neighboring shopping mall.

In 2006,April 2008, we were awarded the management of all the energy production and services for Socata,signed a contract with Artenius, a subsidiary of La Seda de Barcelona chemical group, for its new site in Sines, South of Lisbon, in Portugal. There, we will construct and operate a production plant encompassing all utilities, including steam, electricity, demineralized water, industrial gas and effluent treatment. Utilities production (including a 40 megawatt co-generation electricity plant) is scheduled to commence in the group EADS, at its Tarbes site.second quarter of 2011. The operation of this plant will involve optimization of the environmental impact, in particular through the use of an anaerobic effluent treatment process used to reduce the volume of waste and recover biogas. The biogas will be used instead of natural gas to produce steam. This contract incorporatesis set to last 15 years and to generate cumulative revenue estimated at €730 million.

Following the expertisesignature of several of our businesses. The range of services includesa fifteen-year multi-service contract with ArcelorMittal in 2002 in Vega do Sul (Brazil), we were involved through Clé Brésil (our special purpose entity formed for the production of gas, electricity and water for allproject) in the expansion of the buildings, as well asArcelorMittal plant. An initial construction contract representing annual revenue of US$8 million was awarded to us for the industrial processes, including Lipofit2, a “clean” fuel. Also included are all services concerning thedesign and construction of utilities production technical maintenance of the plant and of the buildings, environmental services for the site and services for users including mail, caretaking, and reception.  This is a three-year contract extendable to five years and representing estimated annual revenues of €3.4 million.  Work on this contract beganunits. The work was accepted in January 2007.November 2009.



39



We continueBack to operate contracts previously entered into with Arcelor (in Montataire-France and in Brazil), Novartis (in Basel-Switzerland), Futuroscope (in Poitiers-France), Visteon (in Germany), Corus Packaging (in the United Kingdom), PSA Peugeot Citroën (in Mulhouse, Sochaux, Vesoul, Belfort and in Trnava in Slovakia), and Schenectady (in Béthune, France).Contents


Multiservices Contracts Signed in 20062009:

We entered into the following multiservices contracts in 2009 with industrial clients.1


Company

Location

Month of Signaturesignature of Contractcontract

Duration of New contract or renewal

Contract


term

Estimated Total Cumulative Revenuecumulative revenue

(in euros)

Services to be Providedprovided

RenaultDCNS

Guyancourt

Rueil-Malmaison

Boulogne-Billancourt

(France)Lorient, Indret and Brest

DecemberApril to June

New

10 years

35 million

Multi-services – military base support services

PSA

Sochaux

May

New

20 years

8 million

Construction and maintenance of roof solar panels

Syngenta

France (and then Europe)

October

New

5 years

60015 million

GeneralSupply of utilities and environmental services for 1 million m²maintenance of real estate: managementrelated equipment.

Maintenance of electrical heatingbuildings and air conditioning installations, managementoutside areas, storehouse logistics and disposal of waste management of open spaces and developed sites, management of all vehicles and garages, management of stock supply and the transport of mail.

Tenant services.


Competition

Most markets for environmental services are very competitive and are characterized by increasing technological challenges arising from regulatorydue to changes in regulation, as well as the presence of experienced competitors.

Competition in each of the markets in which we serve occursparticipate is based primarily on the basis of the quality of the products and services provided, and the suppliers’ reliability, customer service, financial strength,position, technology, price, reputation and experience in providing services. Additional considerations include the ability to adapt to changing legal and regulatory environments, as well as the ability to manage employees accustomed to working for governmentalpublic authorities or non-outsourced divisionsdepartments of industrial or commercial enterprises.service sector companies. In each of theour markets, in which we operate, our competitive strengths areadvantages include our high level of technological and technical expertise, our financial position, our geographical reach, and our experience in providing all environmental management services, managing privatized andour management of outsourced employees, and meetingour ability to comply with regulatory requirements.

With regard toIn the provision of environmental services to industry in particular, our main competitor issector, Suez whichEnvironnement provides a range of services including in particular energy, water and waste management. In the energy sector, the GDF-Suez merger does not significantly change our competitive position, despite the merger of Cofatech (GDF) and Elyo (Suez) to form Cofely. Certain actorsplayers, who originally operated in theneighboring industrial sectorsectors, are also tryingseeking to enlargeextend the scope of their business to includebusiness. This is the provision of environmental services. In particular,case for the subsidiaries of certain energy producers (such as Cofatech, a subsidiary of GDF, as well as subsidiaries ofproviders, notably in the heating network sector (Vattenfall, RWE) have been active in doing so.. Companies specialized in electronic installation, such as Cegelec, have also expanded their environmental services offering. In the area of facilities management, companies such as Johnson Controls seek to provide multi-service offers to their commercial clients. Cleaning companies, such as ISS, look to expand their offerings and to provide solutions outside of the cleaning business. Finally, among new competitors, GE announced its intenti on of developingintention to expand its business ininto the water sector. However, the vast majority of competitors do not coveroffer the same spectrumrange of technical expertise regardingexpert ise in environmental services asthat we do. Therefore, in a certain number of cases, our competitors are forcedrequired to set up ad-hoc arrangementsad hoc alliances of companies to respondcover the service scope required by customers.


1

Revenues expected under the contracts won in 2009 have been converted into euros at the closing exchange rate as of December 31, 2009 Accordingly, these amounts may differ from the amounts announced in earlier Group press releases.



40



Back to clients’ demands.  Contents


We expect that other enterprises that compete with usour competitors in individual sectors will, in the coming years, seek to expand their activities to become integrated environmental management servicesservice providers. This change has been prompted by clients’the desire of potential customers to outsource a larger scopeportions of their business.


Thus we have observed the development of companies with worldwide capabilities focusing on multi-site and international tenders, such as Johnson Controls or Jones Lang Lasalle in facilities management. Industrial service providers are also moving towards greater consolidation by creating multi-service subsidiaries. This is the case of Voith in Germany.

A new form of competition has developed over the last few years withdue to the growing role of financial groups such as infrastructure funds (for instance Macquarie Bank)(Macquarie Bank, etc.) or private equity funds. Although they are not global or strategic competitors, theythese players are often present in privatization tenders and asset sales and can occasionally deprivecompete with the Group for growth opportunities. The development of PPP has also resulted in the emergence of new players from the construction sector that are able to manage the major construction and financing challenges required by these operations. Service providers like us may join forces with these companies as part of growth opportunities.alliances formed to respond to tender offers. Such companies mainly include Bouygues, Vinci and Eiffage.


ItFinally, it is important to note that our majormain competitor is often the clientcustomer itself. ClientsCustomers systematically compare the benefits and advantages of outsourcing compared towith maintaining the status quo.


With regard to the provision of environmental services to public authorities, there has been a tendency in France over the last fewin recent years totowards a return the provision of such services to local government control, which has reduced the number of delegated management contracts available inon the market. Nevertheless, this tendency has remained fairly limited. In Germany, public entities (Stadtwerke plays) play a strongleading role in

1

Revenues expected under foreign contracts won during 2006 have been converted into euros at the rate of exchange prevailing on December 31, 2006.  Accordingly, these amounts may differ from the amounts announced in earlier press releases.  




Back to contents



the environmental services market (in the areas of water, waste management and energy services). In numerousa number of countries in Eastern Europe, however, markets are slowly opening to competition, albeit partially.

This trend nonetheless remains limited. Finally, new actorsplayers from the public works and building sectors may begincould look to offer services in the service market following completion of largeinvolving major and/or extensive investments,complex new investment, which in turnsubsequently require the provision of services (e.g., construction of a hospital which then requires ongoingoperation and maintenance of common and technical services). These new actorsplayers may provide services within the contextas part of a BOT or concession contractcontracts or, in France, as part of a “partnership contract”contracts” as authorized by athe new regulation of June 2004.2004 regulation. The emergence of such new actorsplayers is a natural outgrowth of the development of a global service market in which ownershipintegrating the construction and financing of infrastructure constructed to support the provision of comprehensive environmental services often reverts backinfrastructures necessary to the clientperformance of services, which then revert to the customer at the end of a contract’s term.  For the moment, however, these new actors have acted on a project-by-project basis, and do not seem to have a global strategy for establishing a true competiti ve presence in the market.contract.

Water Division

The principal competitors of Veolia Eau confirmed its role as leader in the water sector in 2006 wereand wastewater treatment sectors,1 where its main competitor across all markets is Suez (through its subsidiary Ondeo) and RWE. RWE entered into a process of reorganization to focus on its energy businesses, with the divestiture of Thames Water Holdings plc, the most significant water management company in Great Britain, to the consortium Kemble Water Limited, managed by Macquarie, and the announcement in March 2006 of the listing of RWE’s American subsidiary American Water. On the other hand, General Electric (through Ionics) and Siemens (through Siemens Water Technologies) have announced their international ambitions in the area of water treatment technology.Environnement.


At both theIn national and regional level,markets, Veolia Eau has a number of local competitors, particularlyincluding both public and mixed private-public operators.

Its main competitors in France are Lyonnaise des Eaux (Suez Environnement), Saur (Séché Environnement) and local public authorities. The year 2009 was also marked by Gelsenwasser increasing its investment in Nantaise des Eaux Services to 100% and by the buildingarrival of new competitors from the environmental services sector (Derichebourg, Pizzorno).

In Spain, our main competitors are Suez Environnement (via Aguas de Barcelona; which Suez Environnement acquired control of in October 2009 after several years as a long-term shareholder) and construction and public works sectors.  Examplescompanies such as Aqualia-FCC, ACS, Sacyr and Acciona, which are also intending to grow internationally.

In the rest of suchEurope, aside from Suez Environnement, our main competitors include SaurAcea in France, FCC (which is pursuing further development internationally)Italy, companies such as Gelsenwasser in Germany and AgbarRemondis, which broke into the market in Spain. Russia.

In the United States, competitors include American Water and(which is relaunching after completing its demerger from RWE), United Water (a subsidiary of Suez).  (Suez) and Aqua America are the main purely American players.

In Asia, various conglomerates (Marubeni, Mitsui, Kerry Utilities, Beijing Capital, Cheung Kong Infrastructure) have attempted to form partnerships in order to conduct water activities. Further,the North African and Middle East markets, as well as Latin America, Veolia Eau facesis in competition locallywith Spanish companies (Acciona, Aqualia-FCC, ACS) and is facing the increasing importance of Japanese trading companies (Mitsui, Marubeni, Mitsubishi, Sumitomo, etc.), which are seeking to establish a position in stable, long-term activities.


1

Sources: Global Water Intelligence (GWI) of November 2009 and Pinsent Masons Water Yearbook 2009/2010.



41



Back to Contents


China is also a strategic development region for Suez Environnement and Asian companies. There is also increased competition from public establishments and local mixed public-private companies, such as Aceathe new entrant Beijing Enterprises, as well as Japanese, Malaysian and Amgathe Singaporean companies, AsiaEnv and Hyflux, which are also present in Italy, Gelsenwasserthe Middle East and North Africa region. This market is also of interest to technology providers such as General Electric and Siemens, which are also betting on India with a specific focus on the desalination and wastewater recycling sectors. But other companies, such as Doosan (South Korea), Keppel (Singapore), VA Tech Wabag (India) and IDE Technologies (Israel), have emphasized their ambitions for international expansion and extending their areas of expertise, in Germany, Canal Isabel II in Spain, or governmental control in Brisbane, Australia orrégies départementalesin France.a manner similar to VWS&T and Degrémont.


Environmental Services


Division

The principalOur main competitors of Veolia Propreté in the environmental servicesthis sector are either solely regional players, or they cover only onecompete for part of the sector in whichservices offered by Veolia Propreté operates.


. In Europe (including Central and Eastern Europe), where Veolia Propreté conducts the majority of its waste management activities, and in the Eastern European zone,business, its principal competitors are Suez actingEnvironnement (acting through its subsidiary SITA,SITA), Remondis FCC and Biffa.


Veolia Propreté may expand further in North America as well, where its principal competitorrepresents a promising growth market for Veolia Propreté. The North American market is highly concentrated, with only two major competitors, Waste Management along withInc. and Republic Services Inc. (the new entity formed by the merger of Allied Waste Industries and Republic Services.


In Latin America, Veolia Propreté’s operations are concentratedServices at the end of 2008). Finally, in Brazil and Mexico, where it primarily competes with Suez and a variety of local companies.


In the Asia/PacificAsia-Pacific region, Veolia Propreté’sour main competitors are Suez as well asEnvironnement and various local companies. The Australian group Brambles (operating under Cleanaway) has withdrawn from the waste management business.


Energy Services Division


The energy services market combines a diversified range of services and has many actorsdifferent types of market player. Through our Energy Services Division, we therefore face strong competition composed of sector-specific players. Only the group formed by the GDF-Suez merger, primarily with Cofely, has the ability to offer a diversified and Veolia Environnement, through its division Veolia Énergie Services (Dalkia), therefore faces very dispersed competition. We believe that the three only companiescomprehensive range of services with a strong international presence that is comparable to Dalkia’s presence and services. Cofely represents a diversified and completemajor competitor, mastering a range of services in this marketexpertise similar to our own presence and services are Suez (Elyo), RWE and Cofatech (Gaz de France).that of Dalkia. Competition was intense in 2009, particularly in France, with a clear policy to win market share.





Back to contents



Among sector-specific players, Dalkia is also confronted withfaces the active presence of large local competitors such as EnBW, ENEL, Vattenfall, Fortum, or ATEL.


ATEL and EON. In the commercialservice sector, competition takes many forms, and comes from specialized companies (in the areas of cleaning, restoration,food services, etc.) seeking to expand their offering to include multi-technical services, and from technical maintenance companies focusing on electronic installation in particular.


technical maintenance and electrical installations. In addition, we face historical but growing competition from municipallymunicipally- or publicly-run companies, principally in Central Europe, Germany, Austria and Italy.


Transportation Division


Through Veolia Transport,In the transportation sector, our principal competitors in the transportation market are large private operators, primarily French, orAmerican and British but also Asian, and public companies controlled locally(national or nationally,local) operating public monopolies. Our principal

The main private operator competitors aton the international levelglobal stage are the British groups FirstGroup,Firstgroup, Arriva, National Express and Stagecoach, Arriva and Go Ahead, andthe French groups Kéolis (which counts the SNCF as an industrial partner and shareholder, though 53% of its share capital is held by Axa Private Equity and la Caisse de Dépot et Placement du Québec, following the transfer by 3i an investment fund, of its interest in the group)Keolis and Transdev (a subsidiary of(see Item 8 “Financial Information Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information – Significant Changes”, below) and the Hong Kong company, MTR Corporation.

With regard to French private groups, Keolis’ main industrial shareholder is SNCF. The Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations, which has an alliancethe majority shareholder in Transdev, is in negotiations with Veolia Environnement regarding the French metro operator, RATP). FirstGroup, which results fromcombination of their two Transportation subsidiaries. These decisions are taken in the purchasecontext of Laidlaw,a planned stock market listing of the Group’s Transport business.

With the current trend towards consolidation in the mass transportation market, SNCF, Keolis and Effia announced a merger project and already work together in a number of areas. In addition, SNCF Proximités, a specialist in local and regional mobility, is the largest American transport operator. It has become the largest world grou p for public and private transportion. positioning itself in several business segments to export its know-how.

Among Veolia Transport’s largest public competitors are Deutsche Bahn (the national rail operator in Germany) and in France, the RATP and SNCF.  


In North America, the competitive market has evolved, particularly as a result of the partial withdrawal of the British groups National Express and Stagecoach, and the purchase of FirstGroup.  In the area of rail transport, Amtrak’s persistent budget difficulties have further opened the market to delegated private management.


SNCF in France.

In Asia, companiestwo players with growing international objectives could becomeambitions represent new competitors in the European and Asian markets. These companies include ComfortDelgro,Of particular note is the transport networkHong Kong suburban metro and train operator, MTR Corporation. This group, which merged with Kowloon-Canton Railway in Singapore, 40%2007, has won a number of contracts including the concession for the Dexing metro line in Beijing and the operation of the reserves of which result from international business, especiallyStockholm metro and the Melbourne suburban rail network. In addition, MTR is present in numerous rail bidding processes in China and Europe. The second largest Asian competitor is ComfortDelgro, which operates the transportation network in Singapore.



42



Back to Contents


In the United Kingdom,States, Amtrak’s persistent budget difficulties have opened the rail market to delegated private management. The competitive environment in the United States has changed with the arrival of new competitors such as Keolis, RATP Développement and MTRC,Go-Ahead.

In conclusion, Veolia Transport is operating in an environment marked by two trends: increasingly intense competition between the subway operator in Hong Kong, which is present at several calls for tenders for rail franchises in Asiamajor international groups and Europe.

industry consolidation, leading to the formation of a few extremely large local passenger transportation groups.

Contracts

We provide a range of services either directly to the customer making the request—for example, in connectionContracts with an outsourcing agreement we have with a public authority or industrial or commercial company—or indirectly on behalf of such customer for the benefit of a third party—for example, in connection with the delegated public service management of a drinking water production and distribution service or management of an urban heating and cooling network. ��The servicesauthorities under which we provide are often vast and multi-functional, requiring adequate employee infrastructure and specialized resources. They may also require management of works or infrastructure that are technically complex—an example would be a wastewater treatment network and purification plant or an industrial co-generation facility.  These works or infrastructure may either be provided by the client, or we may finance and build the infrastructure ours elves.


Ourgeneral-interest services to the public provided on behalf of public authorities include water distribution, wastewater treatment, collection and treatment of household waste, public transport, production and distribution of heating and cooling through urban networks and energy services.  In numerous countries, the provision of such services, often referred to as general economic interest or public services, for which the local authority is responsible, can take a number of forms depending on whether the local authority decides to delegate operating activities to a company which acts on its behalf but under its control or whether it decides to perform the services itself with the assistance of the company.

These so-called “general economic interest” services or public services are considered in numerous countries to be the responsibility of the localcompetent public authority. Accordingly, the publicThis authority is chargedtherefore responsible not only withfor implementing regulations or controls overand exercising oversight, but also plays an active role in the provisionmanagement of publicthe services, but must also implicate itself more directly in their management, through one of the following means:  approaches:


·

the public authority can decide to directly manage and provideoperate public services on its own (“direct” or “internal” management) ;with its own resources or resources transferred to a 100% subsidiary over which it exercises control similar to that exercised over its own departments or agencies;


·

the public authority can decide to provide the service itself, but to use private operators as subcontractors to manage the service on its behalf, or to provide limited services ;services;


·

the public authority may prefer to confer on a third party the entiretransfer responsibility for providing the public services into a company, to which case the third party, depending on the specifications of the contract, would be responsible for providing the human resources, materials and finances necessary to provide the services.  The public authority may also request that the third party finance and construct any required infrastructureit delegates or transfers, under the contract.terms of a contract comprising technical performance commitments, the right and the obligation to operate the service, providing staff, equipment and financing necessary and, where appropriate, financing and building the infrastructure. Third parties to whomselected by the public authority resorts may be either private operators, mixedmixed-ownership public-private companiesjoint ventures or other public entities.





Back to contents



Based on theThe different ways in which public authorities choose to manage the provision of public services lead to different contractual mechanisms between the public authority and the Company, to which we have developed various types of contracts to respond to their specific requirements.easily adapt. The contracts we employuse generally fall into one of three categories, depending on (i) whether we are entrusted with totalfull responsibility for provision of aproviding the public service and (ii) whether we have a financial and commercial relationship with end users:


·

TheWhen the public authority chooses to directly manage and provide public services on its own (direct management), but has only limited means, andit may therefore callscall upon a private operator to provide certain limited services or works.  Itwork for which it pays a contractually-agreed price. In such circumstances the operatorpublic authority may enter into a set price under contract.  variety of contracts for the supply of construction work and services.


·

TheWhere new infrastructure is necessary for the provision of the services, the public authority may prefer a more expansivecomprehensive build/operate contract, involving construction and management of services, which may include the financing of required infrastructure. These are known as public market contracts under municipalEU law and also referred to as Build, Operate, Transfer (BOT) contracts, or since 2004 in France, asthese arrangements may fall into the category of “partnership contracts”, orsince 2004.


·

TheWhen the public authority entrusts a company with the responsibility for the full provision offully providing a public service, withand the company assumingassumes all or part of the operational risks. Generally, the provision ofrisks, generally, the service is then financed by the fees and charges paid by the end user of the service.user. The contractor, is thus responsiblewho has financial and operating responsibility for providing the business, on an operational and financial level, butservice, must do so in accordance with the terms set by the public authority in respect ofwhich include minimum service thresholds, expected performancesperformance and prices charged to end users. This is the logic of “delegated management”, or “concession” in a global sense (alsoThese arrangements are known as a“delegated management” contracts or “concession arrangements” under EU law (a type of Public Private PartenshipPartnerships – PPP) , which means that. Characteristically, they entail a transfer to the entity assumesconcession holder of the “risks and perils” or “risks and advantages”benefits” of the activity, to the extent its compensation is linked to the operating results.



43



Back to Contents


In certain countries and for certain services, public authorities may also choose to be involved as little involved as possible in the provision of public services to inhabitants choosing instead only to regulate the activitiesor be satisfied with more or less restrictive regulation of the private provider. Thisrelevant activities. Such a situation requires a company to seek out customers directly among the local population and creates opportunities for us, as well, most often through acquisition of thea private operator that is already serving a given region.area.

The historic traditions ofDepending on the various countriescountry in which we operateare operating, historic traditions will tend to favorlead to the predominance of one of the above-mentioned general contract types over the other.others. In France, for example, where there is a longlong-standing tradition of granting concessions, and delegated public service management contracts areis often the preferred choice.  

approach. Current practices in various countries have tended to converge,are converging, however, with public authorities resorting toadopting one or another of the otherabove-mentioned contract types depending on the situation. All suchIn most cases, all contracts have in most cases, the common feature of being long-term agreements. They increasingly include the building of infrastructure (or at least an upgrade of existing infrastructure) and its maintenance and may also incorporate the financing thereof.

We also enter into outsourcing contracts for the management of complex services with our industrial and commercial clients,service sector customers, which are analogoussimilar to the above contracts. Such contracts entered into with public authorities above.take a variety of forms but are always tailored to customer expectations.

Despite differences relatedrelating to the nature of clients,customers, the services contracted, for and the nature of the legal systems in which we operate, the expectations of our clients have tendedcustomers tend to converge towardsconvege on the same goals: a demand for transparency during the bid process and during contract performance, formation of a real partnership in search of ways to improve productivity and performance gains, and a desire for clearto achieve performance targets andwith variable compensation depending on achievement.

We are also very attentive to contractual provisions, in particular when we must finance the investments called forrequired under a contract. Given the complexity of management agreements and their generally longer term,long-term nature, we possess skills regardingin contract analysis and control. The legal and financial departments of our divisionsDivisions are involved in the negotiation and preparation of tender bids and then contracts, and controlsverifications are imposedmade on the implementation of our main contracts. Each year, our internal audit department includes a review of the contractual and financial stakes of our most significant contracts in its annual program.

Environmental Regulation, Policies and Compliance

Environmental Regulation

Our businesses are subject to extensive, evolving and increasingly stringent environmental regulations in developing countries as well as in the European Union and North America. On April 21, 2004, the European Union adopted a directive on environmental responsibility that has been enacted, or is in the process of being enacted, by member states. This directive sets up a general a framework, across the European Union, of environmental liability of competent public authorities for serious environmental damage or threat of damage to water, land, protected species or natural habitats, excluding individuals and property. This potential liability encourages the implementation of preventive measures. This directive, as enacted in French law, extends the scope of strict liability for certain serious damage to the environment.

In addition, the Regulation on Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), which came into effect on June 1, 2007, establishes a new European methodology for the management of chemicals that is aimed at enhancing the knowledge of substances currently circulating within the European market. This has implications for the Group as a user of such substances. It also targets the strengthening of cooperation and exchange of information with suppliers and customers. It involves improving risk management at all stages of the life cycle of chemical substances and strengthening the prevention of chemical risks concerning Group employees. The Classification, Labeling, Packaging (CLP) regulation has the same end purpose as the REACH regulation, and came into effect on January 20, 2009. This regulation makes certain amendments to existing provisions concerning t he classification, labeling and packaging of dangerous substances.

At the end of 2008, European MPs adopted a “climate-energy” package, in order to ensure European Union compliance with climate objectives by 2020: 20% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, 20% improvement in energy efficiency and 20% share of energy consumption in the European Union produced from renewable sources. This “climate-energy package” is composed of six new legislative initiatives: a directive on renewable energies, a directive on the emission trading scheme (ETS), an effort-sharing decision on greenhouse gas emissions, (outside ETS), a directive on the capture and storage of CO2(adopted on April 23, 2009 and currently being enacted by Member States), a directive on fuel quality, and a directive on reducing CO2 emissions by cars.



44



Back to Contents


Finally, in order to carry out decisions regarding the Convention on Biological Diversity, in May 2006 the European Commission implemented an action plan comprising objectives aimed at halting the decline in biodiversity and measures enabling the achievement of objectives by the end of 2010. This action plan is based on an evaluation of lost biodiversity in Europe and elsewhere in the world and measures already taken by the European Union to resolve this problem. In October 2009, the Conference of the Parties (COP) revised the strategic action plan of the Convention, in order to set new objectives for the period 2010-2020; its main focus was an analysis of how ecosystems contribute to human well-being.

Water

Water and wastewater servicestreatment activities are highly sensitive to governmental regulation. In Europe and North America,the United States, governments have enacted significant environmental laws at theEuropean, national and local levellevels in response to public concern over the environment. The quality of drinking water and the treatment of wastewater are increasingly subject to regulation in developing countries as well, both in urban and rural areas.

The quality of drinking water is strictly regulated at the European Union level by Directivedirective 98/83/EC of November 3, 1998, relating toon the quality of water destinedintended for human consumption, which has been enacted by EU member states. It was transposed into EU member states and French law by a decree on December 20, 2001 (certainvarious provisions of which have also been incorporated intoin the French public health code). ThisPublic Health Code. In addition to quality control measures, this directive introduces beyond quality control, the concept of evaluating risks on an ongoing basis. The collection, treatment and discharge of urban, industrial and commercial wastewater is governed by Directivedirective 91/271271/EC of May 21, 1991, the objectives of which were further reinforcedconfirmed and expandedextended by the water Directiveframework directive 2000/60/EC of October 23, 2000. Directive 2006/118/EC of December 12, 2006 on the protection of groundwater provides for oversight of and restrictions on chemical substances in water by 2015. Directive 2008/105/EC of December 16, 2008 lay s down environmental quality standards for 43 chemical substances presenting a major risk to the environment or public health in the field of water policy. In France, regulations governing water intended for human consumption were revised in 2007, resulting in new water quality limits and references. The recovery of rainwater is also governed by a strict regulatory framework, covering, in particular, the use of rainwater in buildings and which introduces specific provisions aimed at protecting the quality of groundwater from the introduction of dangerous substances. For installations serving more than 10,000 inhabitants, the person responsible for water distribution must prepare a study of the vulnerability of water facilities to malicious acts. In establishments where water is provided to the public, it is the responsibility of the person in charge of the establishment (and not the public service provider) to ensure that the water is fit for consumption.

The treatment of wastewater is also directly impacted by directive 2008/56/EC of June 17, 2008, known as the “Marine Strategy Framework Directive”, which seeks to protect and conserve the marine environment and thereby conserve the ecosystem and to establish protected marine areas in order to contribute to achieving healthy ecological conditions in the European Union marine environment by 2020 and by European directive 2006/7/EC of February 15, 2006 concerning “bathing water”, which imposes new restrictions on the oversight and management of bathing water and information provided to the general public.

Public authorities also impose strict regulations uponconcerning industrial and commercial wastewater that enterslikely to penetrate collection systems, and theas well as wastewater and sludge fromoriginating in urban used water treatment installations. In this respect, the waste framework directive of November 19, 2008 classifies land treatment using sludge produced by wastewater treatment plants.  D irective 2006/118/CE of December 12, 2006 concerning the quality fo ground water imposes oversight obligations andplants as a limit regarding the amount of chemical substances that may be released in water by 2015.recovery operation.



45



Back to contentsContents



France has numerous laws and regulations concerning water pollution, as well as numerous administrative agencies involved in the enforcement of those laws and regulations. Certain discharges, disposals, and other actions with a potentially negative impact on the quality of surface or undergroundground water sources require authorization or notification. For instance, public authorities must be notified of any facility that pumps groundwater in amounts that exceed specified volumes and French law prohibits or restricts release of certain substances in water. Individuals and companies are subject to civil and criminal penalties under these laws and regulations.  The law of December 30, 2006 relating toon water and aquatic environments addresses community demandsEU requirements for high quality water and significantly modifies the French legislation on water, also addressing community objectives concerningEU water quality untilobjectives for 2015.

Government authorities In addition to measures to preserve the quality and quantity of resources, the Planning Law no. 2009-967 of August 3, 20 09 to implement theGrenelle de l’environnement1 decisions (known as the “Grenelle 1 Law”) provides for the implementation of a blueprint to preserve the ecological continuity of surface water masses. This blueprint must be taken into account in the territorial planning process, via urban-planning and water-planning documents. With regard to public health, measures must be taken to protect drinking water catchment areas of strategic supply importance and certain toxic emissions into water sources must be reduced by 2013. In the wastewater treatment sector, treatment plants must be brought up to standard by 2012 at the latest. Autonomous wastewater treatment is subject to strict regulation to protect the quality of the receiving environment, sanitary conditions and public health. The violation of these texts is punishable by both civil and criminal penalties and the corporation responsible may itself also strictly regulate industrial wastewater that are liable to enter the water supply and wastewater and mud refuse from urban water treatment plants.be found criminally liable.

In the United States, the primarymain federal laws affectingconcerning the provision of water and wastewater treatment services are the Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 and related regulations promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). These laws and regulations establish standards for drinking water and liquid discharges. Each U.S. state has the right to establish criteria and standards stricter than those establishedset up by the EPA and a number of states have done so.

Environmental Services

In numerous countries, waste treatmentprocessing facilities are subject to laws and regulations that require usservice providers to obtain permits from public authorities to operate most of our facilities from governmental authorities.their facilities. The permittingpermit process requires us to complete environmental and health impact studies and risk assessments with respect to the relevant facility. Operators of landfillslandfill sites must provide specific financial guarantees (which typically take the form of bank guarantees) that cover in particular the monitoring and recoveryrehabilitation of the sitesites during, and up to 30 years after, itstheir operation. In addition, landfillslandfill sites must comply with a number of specific standards and incineration plants are usually subject to rules that limit the emission of pollutants. Waste may also be subject to various regulations depending uponon the type of waste. For example, sludge produced at wastewater treatment stations that willto be compostedused in agriculture must comply with strict regulatio nsregulations relating to its content of organic materials and trace metals (heavy metals likesuch as cadmium, mercury or led)lead). Further,Moreover, the NFU 44-095 standard, establishedimplemented in 2002 and henceforth applicable in France since March 18, 2004, strictly regulates the composting of material that results fromproduced by the treatment of wastewater.

In France, pursuant to the provisions of the Environment Code (articlesArticles L. 511-1 et seq. of the Environmental Code (seqCode de l’environnement.) relating to registered installationsclassified facilities for the protection of the environment, several decrees and ministerial and administrative orders establish rules applicable to landfillslandfill sites for household, industrial, commercialhazardous and hazardousnon-hazardous waste. These orders govern, among other things, the design and the construction of waste treatmentprocessing centers. Hazardous waste is subject to strict monitoring at all stages of the treatment process.processing cycle. Hazardous waste is tracked using a waste monitoring slip (bordereau de suivi des déchets - BSD). Waste-to-energy centers are subject to numerous restrictions, including in particular limitations on the amount of pollutant emissions: for example, directive 2000/76/EC of December 4, 2000 on the incineration of waste fixessets emission thresholds for dioxins and NOXNOx in particular. In connection with

At European Union level, a new Waste directive was adopted on November 19, 2008, setting up a hierarchy of different waste management measures and favoring (i) the applicationprevention of production, notably by requiring Member States to draft national programs, (ii) re-use, (iii) recycling, by defining new objectives to be attained by Member States by 2020, (iv) other forms of recovery and (v) safe disposal. It clarifies the concepts of recovery, elimination, end-of-waste status and by-products. The aim of this directive in France, conformity studies were submitted to local French authori ties in charge of the supervision of each relevant installation in June 2003, in order to determine the necessary corrective measures to be implemented by the end of 2005.

At the European Union level, the framework for waste management regulation is provided by directives that set overall regulatory goals of waste prevention, collection, recycling and reuse. European Union member states are required to prohibit the uncontrolled discarding, discharge and treatment of waste pursuant to these directives. Several existing European regulations seek to have member states define a national strategy that allows for the progressive reduction of dumping of biodegradable waste. The regulations are intended to promote recycling, composting and energywaste-to-energy recovery of household waste. Further,


1

Grenelle de l’Environnement(France): talks between the European Union has,French government and a wide variety of organizations in October 2007 to establish a roadmap for sustainable ecology, development and construction.



46



Back to Contents


With respect to the cross-border transportation of waste, the regulation of June 14, 2006 concerning the transportation of waste entered into force in July 2007. This text defines the conditions of the supervision and audit of waste transfers and simplifies and defines current procedures for the supervision of waste transfers for non-hazardous, recyclable waste.

Furthermore, through directive 2003/87/EC of October 13, 2003, the European Union implemented a quotaan allowance system for the emission of greenhouse gasesgas emissions, targeting carbon dioxide in particular. Our waste managementonly. Veolia Environnement’s environmental services business is excluded fromfalls outside the scope of the first and second phases (2005-2007 and 2008-2012) of this directive, but may be t argeted subsequently, and may as a result establish procedures to reduce methane and carbon dioxide emissions..

The major statutes governing our waste management activities in the United States include the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, the Clean Water Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (also known as “CERCLA” or “Superfund”), and the Clean Air Act, all of which are administered either by the EPA or state agencies to which the EPA delegates enforcement powers. Each state in which we operate also has its own laws and regulations governing the generation,production, collection and treatmentprocessing of waste, including, in most cases, the design, operation, maintenance, closure and post-closure maintenance of landfillslandfill sites and other hazardous and non-hazardous waste management facilities.

Energy Services

Our energy-related activities in Europe (primarily the supply of energy services involving thermal and independent energy) are subject to directives and regulations that seek to control environmental impact and risks.

One such directive, ofdated October 23, 2001, establishes emission limits for sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and dust and regulates the construction of large combustion plants. It requires the implementation of national emission ceilings for certain atmospheric pollutants such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and volatile organic compounds.

Since the end of 2007, the IPPC directive of September 24, 1996 regarding the “integrated prevention of pollution” is fully applicable. This directive requires a number of European industrial facilities, including large combustion plants, to obtain licenses authorizing their operations, which must be renewed periodically, and which are based, to the extent possible, on techniques having the least environmental impact, referred to as “best available techniques”.

Following the repeal of European regulation 2037/2000/EC, of June 29, 2000a new European regulation 1005/2009/EC, dated September 16, 2009, sets a timetable for the elimination of substances that destroy the ozone layer, in particular refrigerating fluids such as chlorofluorocarbon and hydro chlorofluorocarbonhydro-chlorofluorocarbon that are used in cooling plants.

As a result of the Kyoto Protocol, European regulation 842/2006/EC of May 17, 2006 requires stringent confinement and traceability measures for greenhouse gases, whether HFC refrigerating liquids or SF6 electrical insulators. Two European regulations clarify leakage control measures for refrigeration equipment containing hydro-fluorocarbons (European regulation 1516/2007/EC of December 19, 2007) and fire protection systems (European regulation 1497/2007/EC of December 18, 2007).

Our Energy Services business is affected by European directive 2003/87/EC of October 13, 2003 on greenhouse gases emission allowances, as amended by European directive 2009/29/EC of April 26, 2009. Given that we have combustion installations with thermal output greater than 20 MW, these are also affected by EU member state national plans for the allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances, which have been in effect since 2005.

European directive 97/23/EC of May 29, 1997, aimed at harmonizing member stateMember State legislation in the area of pressure equipment, imposes various security requirements for the design and manufacturing of such equipment, and requires that it be inspected for proper use.

With respect to European directive 2003/87/EC of October 13, 2003 on greenhouse gases and carbon dioxide quotas, Dalkia’s combustion installations of more than 20 MW have been partan inspection of the national planscompliance of EU member states for the allocation of quotas since February 2005.




Back to contents



Finally, with respect to its production of sanitary hot water, Dalkia is directly affected by European directive 98/83/EC of November 3, 1998, which addresses the quality of water destined for human consumption. Eighteen states, including France, believe that this directive applies to cold and to hot water and to all types of management systems for production and distribution.units housing such equipment.

All of the directives and regulations mentioned above have been subsequently implemented inmust be transposed into local law by each member stateMember State of the European Union. In France, this primarily means compliance with athe law of July 19, 1976 law and its implementing decrees relating toon the environmental protection of designated installations. installations, now integrated into the French Environmental Code.

Under this law, Dalkia must obtain various permits and authorizations from regulatory authorities in order to operate its facilities, and ensure that its operations strictly comply strictly with the terms of such permits. For large combustion installations (output(thermal output greater than 20 MW), new regulations were imposed in 2002 (for new installations) and in 2003 (for existing installations) with respect to emission limits, in application of European Union directive 2001/80/EC of October 23, 2001.2001 and by the increasingly systematic application of “best available techniques”.



47



Back to Contents


Finally, with respect to the production of sanitary hot water, Dalkia is directly affected by European directive 98/83/EC of November 3, 1998 (as transposed in numerous national texts) which addresses the quality of water intended for human consumption. Eighteen Member States, including France, have taken the position that this directive applies to cold and hot water and to all types of management systems for the production and distribution of hot and cold water.

Articles R.512-55 to R.512-66 of the Environmental Code also require periodic inspection of certain installations classified as subject to reporting requirements. All orders governing the performance of such periodic inspections were published in 2008.

Decree no. 2007/737 of May 7, 2007, also integrated in the Environmental Code, completes Regulation 842/2006/EC and regulates the conditions of market release, use, recovery and destruction of substances used or intended for use as refrigerating fluid in refrigeration or air-conditioning equipment.

With regard to pressure equipment, directive 97/23/EC of May 29, 1997 (which applies(applicable to material constructedequipment manufactured since 2002) has modifiedalso modifies the procedure and inspection regulatory regimesframeworks of member states in relation to procedure and inspection, and has helped to harmonize the operation of all installations that use such equipment. In France, athe decree of March 15, 2000, as modifiedamended by athe more recent decree of March 30, 2005, has transposedenacts this directive into national law.

In relation to managing the risk of legionellalegionnaires’ disease, the European Working Group for Legionella Infections (EWGLI) has,, with the support and approval of the European Commission and based on the European Surveillance Scheme for Travel Associated Legionnaires’ Disease (EWGLINET), has published new European guidelines for the control and prevention of travel associated legionella disease.travel-associated legionnaires’ disease (EWGLI 2005). In general, texts on the issueof varying reach are issued in Europe and around the world by public health authorities and associations for the protection of travelers.workers. Very often, these texts are presented in the form of preventive recommendations, for prevention, which take into account the physico-chemical and biological nature of water and prescribe corrective actions when certain indicators are present. Various professional associations have also issued their own guidelines for prevention.

In France, the health ministry has recommended, since 1997, that health professionals and managers of establishments implement best practices for the design and maintenance of sanitary hot water production installations and networks, air climateair-conditioning systems and other installations at risk.high-risk installations. In December 2004, there were also newly issueda new French ICPE classification was created to define guidelines for the design and operation of cooling facilities using vapor processes (cooling towers).

In Spain, the royal decree 865/2003 of July 4, 2003 establishes criteria for the quality of water and the frequency of inspection procedures, as well as for when action must be taken once certain limits are exceeded. A collection of descriptive procedures set out the actions to be taken and the situations where liability attches. A Spanish standard-setting association has issued a guideguidelines on the subject (100030IN).

In the United Kingdom, an approved codeApproved Code of practicePractice (ACOP L8) issued by the Health and Safety Executive is the authoritative text, whichfully applicable and has also inspiredhad a great influence on similar procedures applicable in Belgium, the Netherlands, Ireland and at EWGLI. Similarly, regulations exist in the Asia-Pacific region, which have been largely inspired by laws and regulations in effect in New Zealand and Australia.

In the United States, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) issues its own guidelines and action plans. The American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) and the Cooling Technology Institute (CTI) have also issued guidelines as well. recommendations.

Italy and Portugal have partially adopted the ASHRAE guidelines, relating tofocusing preventive measures on the protection of tourists.



48



Back to Contents


Transportation

Our transportation service activities areTransportation business is subject to a number of national and European regulations and particularly European Union directives that limit, emissionsamongst other things, emission levels from petrol and diesel engines and require us to obtain certain permits.

In theheat engines. A series of European Union, standards called “EURO”regulations have also been establisheddrafted setting EURO standards. These impose maximum polluting emission levels for polluting emissions from thermal engines. All new vehicles currently constructedmanufactured in the European Union are inhave complied with “EURO 5” standards since September 1, 2009. Since this date, Veolia Transport’s vehicle pool has been gradually being brought into compliance with the “EURO 3” standards and Veolia Transport’s networks5” standard as vehicles are renewing their fleetsreplaced. This standard imposes stricter requirements with “EURO 3” vehicles. In 2005, arespect to reducing polluting emissions than the “EURO 4” standard, took effect with even stricter requirements for the reductionwhich was applicable since 2006. Furthermore, as part of polluting emissions.

Further, Veolia Transport has made a commitment, in connection with its environmental management system, Veolia Transport is committed to lowerlowering its totalpolluting emissions globally and to prepareon a like-fo r-like basis. To this end, we are preparing for the new standards by testingexperimenting with and experimenting withtesting emission reduction systems for polluting emissions and greenhouse gases, which will eventuallysubsequently be sold,marketed, thereby reaffirming itsour role as expert and consultantadvisor to client collectivities.customer public authorities.

Finally, Veolia Transport signed a Sustainable Development Charter composed of eight commitments. This Charter has been distributed in eighteen languages to all Veolia Transport operations. Three articles concern resource management and the management of environmental risks and comprise objectives to be attained by 2011. The “Eco-Efficient Travel”TM indicator implemented across a group of benchmark sites, entails a commitment to achieving a given percentage of green vehicles and vehicles washed with recycled water. The third commitment involves encouraging the preservation of resources and “eco-friendly actions”, by our employees and passenger customers, primarily by training drivers how to drive in a smooth and fuel-efficient manner.

Veolia Transport is also subject to the environmental standards applicable to depots, garages and underground cisterns whose activitiestanks, which may present a dangerenvironmental risks or inconvenience to the environment.problems. For this reason, thea majority of sites in France are subject to the regulations governing facilities classified facilities for theenvironmental protection, of the environment, morealthough generally in the form of a simple notification.only simplified reporting requirements apply.

Finally, in France, the law of February 11, 2005 concerning equal rights and opportunities, the involvement and citizenship of handicapped persons requires that all public transport must be accessibleVeolia Transport priority sites are subject to handicapped persons within 10 years.environmental regulation audits every five years, as well as interim follow-up audits.

Environmental Policies

We strive to contribute tohelp enhance the enhancement of quality of life in places wherewherever we operate, and have placed the challenges of sustainable development at the heart of our strategy. ToFor this end,purpose, we dofocus not focus only on the preservation of the environment and the protection of natural resources and biodiversity, but also assume ourits economic and social responsibilities, particularly at a local level where we are committed to stimulating progress.




Back Further information concerning our commitment to contents



sustainable development may be found in our Sustainable Development Report.

Our action regarding greenhouse gases


An increase in greenhouse gases in the atmosphere has led certain countries, as well as the international community, to implement regulatory measures in order to limit this trend. At the international level, the Kyoto Protocol finalized in 1997, came into force in February 2005. At the European level,2005 and gave the European Union has implemented, throughthe objective of reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the European Union by 8% over the period 2008-2012, compared with 1990 emission levels. Directive 2003/87/EC of October 13, 2003 a quota exchangecreated an emission allowance trading system for carbon gas emissions,within the ETS ("European Union, known as Emission Trading System")Scheme (ETS). ThisThe resulting system is similar to that ofoperates in parallel with the Kyoto Protocol system, which came into operation in place since the beginning of 2005 which hasand led to the creation of national systemsNational Allowance Allocation Plans (NAAP) for an initial period (2005-2007) followed by a second period (2008-2012), corresponding to the Kyoto Protocol commitment period. Euro pean directive 2009/29/EC of quota allocation (PNAQ).  In France,April 26, 2009 amended the PNAQ1 was adopted forETS directive and extended the 2005-2007 period, and the PNAQ2 for the 2008-2012 period.  In 2006, a an initiative was launched within the European Union to revise Directive 2003/87/EC, the goal of which is to expand the Directive's application, reinforce its co ntrol mechanisms and implement a quotaallowance trading system similar to that of the Kyoto Protocol.cover a third period (2013-2020), which provides for a progressive reduction in allowances granted and new grant procedures.



49



Back to Contents


We are alreadyThe Group is active in this field at the European Union level and internationally, as well as at thea national level.level (see Note 42 to our Consolidated Financial Statements).


·

AtIn the European Union, level, all large combustion installations with thermal output greater than 20 MW fall underare subject to the new quota exchange system.allowance trading scheme. For us,the Group, this primarily affects ourthe Energy Services division,Division, which manages almost 250 suchover 80,000 combustion installations in Europe, (i.e., more than 2% of total installations). Quotasincluding nearly 250 installations concerned by emission allowances. Allowances awarded to Veolia Énergie (Dalkia)Dalkia represent approximately 1% of alltotal European quotas awarded. Veolia Énergie (Dalkia)allowances. Dalkia has worked with customersadopted an active approach to help keepmanaging carbon dioxide emissions within quota limits, and has establishedallowances, by implementing an organization dedicatedappropriate structure and creating a special-purpose entity, VEETRA, to this endeavor.  This haspurchase, sell and price different types of greenhouse gas credits. These initiatives have enabled usit to be an early participant in the quota exchangeallowance trading market, and through our participation we have optimizedin order to minimize the profitabilitycost of our contractscarbon restrictions and in some cases assisted clientsfinance new investments that help reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Some of Veolia Eau’s sites in financing new investmentsGermany have also been affected, following its takeover of public authority contracts (known asStadtwerke).

At international level (Kyoto Protocol), the Group seeks to generate emission credits that can be traded on the market, by participating in projects in partnership with other European or developing countries that help to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Some of Veolia Eau’s sites in Germany are also affected, following the gain of certain municipal contracts (Stadtwerke).


·

At the international level (Kyoto Protocol), we have begun trying to generate emission credits that would be tradable on the market, by participating in projects with other countries that help to reduce greenhouse gases. Veolia Propreté and Veolia Énergie (Dalkia) have already tested this in practice, throughhas completed six projects classified as Clean Development Mechanisms (CDM) by the CDM Executive Council: two in Brazil and one each in Egypt, along with six otherMexico, Argentina and Colombia. The experience gathered during these projects is now used for new projects under development. Approximately ten projects are expected to be carried out in South American projects.America, most of which relate to sites operated by Proactiva, and others are under consideration or currently ongoing in Asia and Africa. Veolia ÉnergieEnergie-Dalkia has also enacteddeveloped a joint project currently in Lithuania. By using dedicated teams, they intend to pursue this activityprogress in Hungary. Veolia Propreté is assessing CDM project opportunities, p rimarily in Asia, while Dalkia assesses opportunities in China, South America, the Middle East, Israel and North Africa concerning heating networks, renewable energies and energy efficiency.

Application in the future.  Regarding transportation services,sector is subject to the first challenge in reducing greenhouse gas emissions is to establishexistence of reliable measurement tools. Veolia Transport is actively involvedparticipated in developing an initial tool that would apply to business transportion,transportation, in collaboration with EpE (Entreprise pour l’Environnement) and ADEME.ADEME (Agence de Protection de L’environnement et de la Maîtrise de L’energie). Veolia Transport is also involved in international climate negotiations. At the time of the United Nations Climate Change Conference (UNCCC) in Copenhagen in December 2009, Veolia Transport launched the “Bridging the gap: pathways for transport in the post-Kyoto process” initiative with GTZ (an international cooperation enterprise for sustainable development), the German Technical Cooperation Agency, Transport Research Laboratory (TRL) and International Association of Public Transport (UITP ). This initiative is intended to find ways for carbon finance trading to fund sustainable urban transportation projects. A series of three seminars was organized in 2009 to place transportation on the agenda of international climate negotiations.


·

At the national level, a number of countries have designed mechanisms to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, either in the form of a set of targeted incentives (as France has done under itsPlan Climat)(such as the “Climate Plan” and “Domestic Projects” in France) or in the form of “domestic projects” that allow selected projects to benefit from emission credits (as Newdomestic markets already set-up or under study (New Zealand, Canada, Australia, and some U.S. states have done). The latter method is currently being studied by France as well.states), that allow certain domestic projects to benefit from emission credits. Our teams are followingmonitoring all of these developments and attempting to integrateworking on integrating them into their projects.

In 2008, we began the operational phase of our planning.


research program on the capture, transportation, use and storage of CO2 and launched preliminary geological studies at industrial sites in the Paris region at which Veolia Propreté operates non-hazardous waste recovery installations and landfill sites. The study phase of this project was launched in 2005. This solution should contribute in 2050, to a 20 to 30% reduction in greenhouse gases worldwide. In this area, we pay particularly close attention to regulations governing the capture and sequestration of CO2, the legal framework for which is set at European level by the directive of April 23, 2009.

Direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions on(electricity and heat) at sites that wethe Group managed in 2006 reached 36.52009 totaled 49.4 million tons of CO2CO2 (carbon dioxide) equivalents (compared to 33.747.2 million tons in 2005)2008).


We are generally contributingOverall, we contributed to a reduction inreducing greenhouse gas emissions by 23.4 million CO2equivalent tons in 2009, compared to 26.9 million CO2equivalent tons in 2008. We accomplished this through both through the daily management of sites that it operateswe operate and through the use of renewable and alternative energies (in particular biomass, landfill gas and geothermal energy).

We are actively followingfollow regulatory developments, thatwhich will undoubtedly become more restrictive in the future, viewing themfuture. We view these as new opportunities to develop and market our environmental management skills.



50



Back to Contents


Preserving ecological balances

Whether through the limitation oflimiting water evaporation, the enhancement ofwastage, enhancing the quality of our waste, the effort to optimizedischarges or optimizing energy consumption in connection with our water distribution and treatment activities, the use ofusing alternative energies in our heating operations, the recoveryacross all businesses, recovering and treatment ofprocessing biogas emissions at our landfillslandfill sites or the use ofusing low-emission fuels in our fleet of public or private transport vehicles, we getare actively involved in the main environmental problemschallenges currently affectingfacing our planet byplanet. We are applying our know-how, technological capabilities and research potential to these problems. We contribute to the enhancement ofenhancing quality of life and sanitary conditions of local populations in our day-to-day operations. For example, by supplying drinking water to impoverished areas we help to reduce infant mortality. In developed countries we have implemented plans to protect against the risk of the presence of legionel lalegionnaire s’ disease in public or industrial facilities, thereby improving public and environmental sanitation. Similarly, improved waste management has a positive impact on quality of life, the environment and public health. The environmental service businesses offer a true means of accelerating sociological revolution.

Preserving economic and social balances

We also consider the economic and social factors that underlie the course of development in the countries in whichwhere we operate, and we work to develop solutions that are adapted to local constraintsrestrictions and know-how transfers. For example, we have instituted a program in Shanghai to educate employees about safety at work. In Romania, Alexandria and Gabon, we have developed programs that have allowed local employees and consumers to better understand the challengestransfer know-how in the provision of water and waste management services. The launch of the company in Alexandria was subsidized by the UN-Habitat agency of the United Agencies (Scroll of Honor 2006).geographical areas where our Divisions have operational responsibilities. We give preference tofavor a partnership approach with non-governmental organizations (NGOs), local authorities and associations in the implementation of action plans for the populationpopulations of emerging countries, which permitsenables the development of model plans that can be reproduced .reproduced. In each of our projects, we seek to create a beneficial and educational dimension for the improvement of public health and the protection of the environment. We also try to assist in the development of areas where we provide services.

Moreover,In 2009, we continuecontinued our strategy of forming partnerships with international institutions, reflecting our active participation in the United Nations Global Compact. Projects are focused on themed actions which involve us working alongside UN agencies, local authorities and civil society. For example, for a number of years we have contributed our expertise to drafting public/private partnership guidelines covering “access to essential services” and this work reached a decisive milestone in July 2009 when it was presented at the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) meeting held in Geneva. We remain a member of the group of experts responsible for “operational aspects” and one of our contracts will be used as a “test” area. This approach is particularly important to the definition of principles of non-discrimination and will provide the poo rest in society with access to basic services (water, wastewater treatment, environmental services, energy services and transportation).

As part of the International Water Forum held in Istanbul (Turkey), we took part in the launch of a multi-partner initiative including the Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Blue Plan, seeking to set-up a Water Think Tank to consider water management in the Mediterranean and focusing on the regulation of disputes over use. The principle of sharing best practice was continued, thanks to the participation of the Mayor of Guayaquil (Ecuador), who presented his approach to the integrated management of urban and port water. In Asia, a joint project with the Asian Development Bank enabled the distribution of a guide comprising considerable wastewater treatment data, for use by towns in the region, at the time of the Annual Congress of Citynet, an association of Asian regional authorities, of which Veolia is a partner member (Yokohama- Japan-September 2009). In addition, we continued to participate in the UNITAR program for strengthening local governance, which brought together over 500 public authority managers in 2009 from Asia, Africa, South America and Central Europe.

In preparation of the Copenhagen Conference (December 2009), we entered into a partnership with the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) to participate in an initiative for developing a charter on public-private partnerships (PPP) in order to improve public access to essential services, which is being supportedoriginal “Territorial Climate Plan” approach undertaken by the twenty largest territories worldwide (federal states such as California, Spanish and Italian provinces, French Ministryregions). Our expertise in clean development mechanisms will form a cornerstone of Foreign Affairs and pursued by several agencies of the United Nations. We testified as to best practices in this area during the Urban World Forum in Vancouver in June 2006.  new partnership.



51



Back to contentsContents



This initiative forms part of the United Nations’ Millennium Development Goals, which were announced in 2000 by the U.N. Secretary General.  The initiative aims at defining the role of private operators with respect to local public service management, while emphasizing the principles of transparency and the sharing of technology and know-how, principles to which we already adhere in connection with our adherence to the U.N. Global Compact. This sharing of know-how occurs in particular through our participation in the cooperation program for sustainable urbanization implemented by the United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR) and the World Bank (using research centers based in Poland, Malaysia, Brazil and Africa).

Our cooperation with UN agencies on multi-year programs as well as our sharing of know-how have led to our being nominated as an associate member of the congress of Asian cities (Citynet).

Since May 2004, we have also pursued a charity program through a corporate foundation created under the new provisions of a law dated August 1, 2003 relating to charitable actions.called Fondation d’Entreprise Veolia Environnement. This initiative is part of a long and stronglong-standing tradition of corporate charity by our company, which attempts to encouragework, while enabling improved coordination of actions and a greater involvement of employees in the areas of solidarity, professional reinsertion, and environmental protectionprotection. The Foundation was initially created for a period of five years and professional employment.

In 2006,was extended in 2009 for a further five years. Since its creation, the Veolia Environnement Foundation crossed the 400-project threshold. Each action ishas supported over 800 projects, each sponsored by onea Group employee. The Foundation calls on the expertise of the Group’s partners. The Foundation receivedfour Group Divisions for theOscar Admical du mécénat d’entreprise 2006 for its actions. The continuity of the commitments, the originality of approaches, the involvement of partners, and the importance of means were all relevant criteria in the award. The notoriety of the Foundation continues to grow and more than half purpose of its projects are outside of France. Australian, Israeli, Armeniancharity work and Latin American subsidiaries have all started their first projects. Among the 178 selected projects in 2006, 53% dedicated to sustainable development in communities, 27% employment, and 20% with environmental protection, the three action areas of the Foundation.


·

With regards to sustainable development in communities, the Foundation supports several programs in Mali, Burkina Faso, Nigeria, Madagascar and Vietnam which also benefitbenefits from the support of Veolia Waterforce/Waterdev throughall Group employees. Among the free provision of expertise.


·

Regarding employment,projects selected in 2009, the Foundation has committed itselflaunched 145 new projects while continuing those initiated in previous years. The larger projects include a number of major importance. In Moldavia, for example, at the request of UNICEF, the Foundation provides financial support and expertise in the water and energy sectors to a three-yearthe Child-Friendly Schools project, which seeks to improve the educational system and renovate basic school infrastructures (water, wastewater treatment, heating and thermal insulation). Another major project in the United States, sponsored by the Sky Island Alliance association, seeks to protect and rehabilitate the Madrean archipelago in Arizona, an exceptional ecosystem which is under threat. The Foundation is acting in partnership with American and Mexican NGOs, the Association forUniversity of Arizona, the DevelopmentUS Environmental Protection Agency and volunteer American employees of Economic Initiatives (ADIE),the Group. Finally, in the Democratic Republic of Congo, the Foundation participates, alongside the Congolese Health Ministry, the French ambassador, AFD, UNICEF, various NGOs and a network of scientific institutions, in a progra m to eliminate cholera. This program is active in seven towns in the Eastern region of the country, located in lacustrine areas identified as the source of epidemics and their spread, in order to develop micro-credit within the disadvantaged suburbs of Paris.


·

Regarding the environment, the Foundation is a partner in the expedition launched at the end of 2006 on the Island of Santo (the Vanuatu archipelago) by the National Natural History Museum, the Research Institute for sustainable development and the nonprofit Pro Natura International. For 5 months, close to 150 researchers from 20 nations will inventory the land and marine wildlife and plants.


We have two humanitarian aid and international cooperation departments: Veolia Water Force and Veolia Waterdev.


Veolia Waterforce was created in 1998 to following the crises cyclone Mitch (Nicaragua) and the flood of the Yangtze river in China. Its main purpose is to share expertise, thanks to a network of 400 volunteer employees. Since its creation, Veolia Waterforce has carried out nearly 50 projects in emergency and development activities, in partnership with the United Nations, government institutions, local communities, NGO’s and private companies. In 2006 Waterforce helped with the deployment of six emergency humanitarian operations, with French and foreign volunteers, in Indonesia, Kenya, Lebanon, Uganda, the Philippines and Serbia. Waterfoce was also called upon by its main partners, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and emergency medical care NGOs, to join forces in order to provide community action capabilities (tests of materials, coordination, development and unified procedures).


In addition, we also participates in development projects through Veolia Waterdev, an international cooperation department whose objective is to share experiences and imagine, together with public entities, civil society representatives and NGOs, solutions that will facilitate access to local public water and sanitation services. Waterdev can intervene in these circumstances to call upon French municipalities to cooperate in a decentralized fashion. For example, in 2006, Waterdev contributed to a drilling project in Cameroon and the perpetuation of newimprove drinking water production and distribution systems,capacity, strengthen treatment of the illness and promote hygiene and health education.

In Romania, the Foundation is assisting the associationAtelier sans frontières (Workshops Without Borders) create a computer hardware maintenance, repackaging and recycling workshop in Bucharest, offering job training to individuals facing extreme hardship and a project aimed at improving water qualityway back to work. In Senegal, the Foundation supports theSamu Social International(an NGO) which is building a home-centre for street children in Ho Chi Minh city (Vietnam)Dakar. In France, the Foundation will assist the development ofPetite Reine, a back-to-work company specializing in the “cargocycle” transportation of goods in urban areas (using electrically-powered three-wheelers). The Foundation also created the Environmental Book Prize (Prix du Livre sur l’Environnement) in 2006. Now in its fourth year, this prize this year was awarded to the “The Green Economy – How to save our plan et” by Philippe Jurgensen. In addition the Foundation created a student solidarity prize open to school and sent two teamsuniversity associations. In the biodiversity sector the Foundation will support Tara Océan, a three-year oceanographic expedition organized by the Tara Foundation and an international scientific consortium to south-east Cambodiamodel the impact of climate warming on the oceans. The Foundation contributes both financial support to evaluate the capacitythis project and the fonctioningskills of Veoliaforce experts.

In 2008, the Foundation integrated the Group’s humanitarian assistance and international cooperation departments, Veolia Waterforce and Veolia Waterdev, within a single structure, Veoliaforce. The network of Veoliaforce volunteer employees, which joined the Foundation in 2008, took part in several emergency humanitarian operations in 2009. The following operations this year involved volunteers from France and abroad. Following the violent earthquake in Indonesia, which lay waste to the Island of Sumatra, Veoliaforce volunteers assessed equipment needs and provided technical installationssupport for the rebuilding of damaged water infrastructures. Veoliaforce volunteers got involved in refugees camps hosting escapees of ethnic conflicts in the Central African Republic and in the North of Congo Brazzaville. In Mali, they supported a program to work onconvey drinking water to nine villages. In Sri La nka they aided in supplying drinking water to a camp of 90,000 refugees. They got involved in Zimbabwe following a cholera epidemic and in Latin America to improve reaction speeds in the organizationevent of partnershipsdisasters by setting up an emergency equipment hub. For the first time, with local authoritiesthe assistance of Veolia Propreté volunteers, Veolia Waterforce also went to the Philippines, where its assistance was requested by UNICEF and actorsthe Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System to provide expertise and training. The aim of the mission was to organize the clean-up, clearing and collection of debris, rubbish and other waste produced by the recent cyclones which ravaged the country. Volunteers also contributed their technical expertise to development projects in over ten different countries, primarily in the water and wastewater treatment sector but also in the processing of plastic waste in Mauritania and with a viewrespect to reinforcing the organization of field teams’ work.heating and energy problems in Moldavia.



52



Back to Contents


The Veolia Environnement Institute: a scientific approach dedicated to the prospective tools for the environment and sustainable development

Human management of the environment represents a major challenge that requires the mobilization of a large number of resources and the supportcommitment of the publicall stakeholders at large and close cooperation among international,local, national and local participants. To address this challenge, we createdinternational levels. This strong conviction led Veolia Environnement to create the Veolia Environnement Institute or VEI,(VEI) in 20012001. The Institue is set up to encourage prospective reflection on a numberforward-looking analysis of issues relatingcentral themes, such as: the economic dimension of the environment; the link between health and the environment; climate change, lifestyles and the challenges of urban growth; society and the environment. This is achieved through exchanges between academe and civil society in order to sustainable development, as well asdevelop autonomous scientific expertise to progressively shedsupport Veolia Environnement’s long-term vision and improve our ability to plan ahead. Through its work, the VEI sheds light on the principal trendschallenges that will influencemark the provision of environmental management servicesEnvironmental Services sector over the next decade.  coming decades.

Through its ProspectsForesight Committee, which is exclusively composed entirely of individuals of international reputation and standing, VEI benefits from the contribution of leading externaloutside expertise on different key subjects (including climate science, public health, the economy and human sciences) while maintaining a presenceremaining firmly anchored in the daily realities of ourVeolia Environnement’s different activities.businesses. This dual capability represents both the originality and the strength of VEI, which intends to be at the heart ofa leading figure in the main environmental debates and issues of the 21st21st century. For this purpose, the Institute calls on a network of multidisciplinary experts thereby collecting the most relevant ideas on global trends. In 2007,2009, the Institute’s objectives are to reinforce the scientific aspectVEI strengthened its international network of academic partners, notably in emerging countries and developed its actions: enriching its research programs through partnerships with prestigious universities and/or institutions, especially internationally. Initial partnerships have been put in placeprogram of forward-looking studies. It is also working with the universityCo llege of Hong Kong relatingEurope (Belgium), the Wuppertal Institute (Germany) and the Veolia Environnement delegation to European Institutions in a study of the “comparison of carbon inventory tools of European cities” that seeks to establish a unified framework. This study will subsequently be presented to the study, monitoringWorld Bank “Urban environment and analysis of actions to be taken concerning transmittable diseases; withclimate change” working group, and advance the Development Research Center (DRC) in Pekin, relating to the environmental service needs within large Chinese cities in the coming 10 years.work being carried out by other international players (World Bank, UNEP, UN-Habitat, IDDRI) on defining a standard greenhouse indicator for cities. At the same time, VEI is developing a high levelthe IVE continued its innovative scientific policy. From the first semester of 2007, the publication policy with two new e-journals.Surveys and Perspectives Integrating




Back to contents



Environment and Society (S.A.P.I.E.N.S),(SAPIENS) is a multidisciplinary review will publishpublishing articles from top specialists in order to set forth recent advances in the latest advancements withinfield of sustainable development.  development andFACTS Reports is a journal dedicated to field work, which seeks to collect, circulate and capitalize on the knowledge and good practices of people in the field (NGOs, international organizations, etc.).


The main themesVEI also organizes conferences on prospective tools for the environment in France and abroad. In October 2009, the fifth conference on “Trade, Urbanization and the Environment” was held in Beijing. This subject is central to be considered by VEI in 2006, which are definedthe problems facing China due to its accelerated economic development, its growing urbanization and the fragile nature and unequal distribution of international resources. This international event was organized by the membersCenter for Human and Economic Development Studies of the Prospects Committee, will includeSchool of Economics of Beijing University, a pioneer in research into human development in China. It also benefited from the economicsupport of official Chinese organizations – Ministry for the Environment, Ministry of Commerce, National Commission for Development and social dimensionsReform – ensuring it good visibility among scientists, decision-makers and the media. The conference offered a for um for exchange between representatives of environmental change, the relationship between healthacademic world, public authorities, industry and civil society to discuss the interaction of trade and the environment and urbanism and the consequencesenvironment, as well as more specific aspects such as “green trade policies”, trade and climate change, sustainable cities, health and the urban environment. Conference speakers from China (Zhou Qifeng, President of climatic changeBeijing University, Qiu Baoxing, Vice-Minister of Construction and Pan Jiahua, Academy of Science) and around the world (Ra Jin-Goo, Deputy Mayor of Seoul, Armatya Sen, Nobel Economics prize laureate, Manfred Fischedick, Vice-President of the Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy) shared their analyses of Chinese realities and priorities and contributed their insight to provide a comprehensive assessment of these challenges.

Together, the work undertaken by the VEI forms a discussion platform for exchanges on waysmajor environmental, economic and social issues that will be called on to satisfy the demands of life and urban growth.civil society.

As of the date hereof,of this annual report on Form 20-F, the members of VEI’s ProspectsIVE Foresight Committee are: Amartya Sen (India), economist, winner of the Nobel Prize for Economics in 1998, professor of political economics and economics at Lamont University and professor of philosophy at Harvard University;had seven members: Hélène Ahrweiler, historian, presidentPresident of the University of Europe and ana social and human sciences expert foradvisor to UNESCO, on human and social sciences;Harvey Fineberg, President of the United States Institute of Medecine, Philippe Kourilsky, biologist, member of the Académie desAcademy of Sciences and professor at the Collège de France; Pierre-MarcFrance, Pierre Marc Johnson, (Canada), attorney,lawyer and physician ex-primeand former prime minister of Quebec, Canada, and expert on environmental matters; Harvey Fineberg (USA),a specialist in major environment challenges, Rajendra K. Pachauri, President of the InstituteGIEC, 2007 Nobel Peace prize laureate and Director-General of Medicine of the United States; and Ms.TERI, Mamphela Ramphele, (South Africa), physician and anthropologist, previously Chairmanformer President of the University of Cape Town and Chairmanformer Director-General of the World Bank.Bank and Amartya Sen, economist,1998 Nobel prize laureate and professor of economics and philosophy at Harvard Univ ersity.



53



VEI also organizes international conferences in France and abroad. In 2006 two conferences were held in Toulouse (France) in January with the Institut d’Economie Industrielle (IDEI) relatingBack to public private partnerships, and in Bangalore (India) with the Energy and Resources Institute (TERI/Delhi) relating to “Energy, Environment and Development: the analysis of opportunities to reduce poverty”. In 2007 a conference is planned in Montreal concerning “The climate 2050 – technological and political solutions”, the Table Center on Global Climate Change (USA) and the National Round Table on the EconomyContents and the Environment (Canada).


Environmental Compliance


(Information regarding article 116 of the French NRE Law)

As a specialist in environmental management services, we are naturally concerned about the environmental consequences of each of our activities,businesses, both in France and worldwide. In this respect, we consistently endeavorseek to comply with applicable regulations, to meet the needs and requestsdemands of our clientscustomers and to optimize the techniques we implement. To illustrate our commitment, wePursuant to the provisions of the NRE Law (French law n°2001-420 of May 15, 2001) and in addition to the description of the Company’s businesses provided above and the financial statements provided below, Veolia Environnement therefore considers it appropriate to highlight below some of the more significant environmental actions that we have undertaken regardless ofwithout any regulatory or contractual obligation to do so. For further information on our sustainable development policy and actions, the information below should be read together with o ur 2009 Sustainable Development Report.

The following sets forth a summary ofAs concerns the use of water resources, raw materialmaterials and energy, measures implemented to improve the energy efficiency and the development and use of renewable energies, conditions of use of soils,ground soil, air, water and soils pollutions,soil pollution, noise pollution:and olfactory pollution and waste, the following measures should be noted:

Water

Use of Water Resources

We preserve water resources by working to prevent wasteful usage in our own installations and in those of our clients.customers. In this respect, the continued implementationprogressive roll-out of our environmental management system provides, in particular, for the monitoring of water consumption and quality in all of our activities. Our action plan reflectsAction plans reflect two primary concerns: increased monitoring of the health quality of water destinedintended for human consumption and the control of leaks in cold water distribution networks (raw or treated) and leaks in domestic hot water production networks. During 2004, we installed an indicator to monitor the quality and compliance with regulatory standards of our drinking water. Our industrial water consumption amounted to 390541.7 million cubic meters in 2006.

Climatic developments2009. Climate changes in certain regions of the world heighten stressesstrains on water resources. We study and promote techniques through whichw hich alternative resources are used, such as the production of drinking water by desalination of seawater and the production of water for industry or farm irrigation by recycling wastewater. These developments are done strictlyconducted in close association with local authorities, regulatory proceedingsbodies and the scientific community.

Water Pollutionpollution

98%98.5% of Veolia Propreté’s landfillslandfill sites are equipped with treatment stations for leachate (water that percolates through stored waste).

Waste WaterWastewater

Our wastewater treatment facility efficiency, measured at biological treatment stations with a capacity greater than 50,000 EH,inhabitant equivalents, reached 90%91.6% in 2006.2009.

Energy – Energy efficiency and the use of renewable energies

We contribute to the reduction of primary energy consumption. Dalkia optimizes energy management for close to 80,000more than 118,000 energy installations in the world,worldwide, from municipalurban heating networks to public housing, commercial or industrial building boilers. Optimizing the energy efficiency of such thermal installations relies upon the quality of their operationsfocuses on operating and maintenance as well as uponquality and their modernization.

Dalkia’s strong growth emphasizes the use of heatingHeating networks that offer optimized energy performances by concentrating production on a single site and involving co-generation.co–generation (the simultaneous production of thermal energy and electricity) represent strong growth areas for Dalkia. Efforts in thisthe renewable energy field includeaffect all of our activities.businesses. We are not only developing the use of renewable energies, like biomass, geothermal and solar energy (Dalkia),offerings, but we are also capturing energy from incineration factoriesplants and biogas from landfills (Veolia Propreté).landfill sites.

Veolia Transport continues to pursue its objective for the provision ofprovide environmental performance training to 90% of its public transport drivers, during the first five years of their careers.  This training effort enables uswith as a result not only to enhance passengers’enhancement passenger comfort and limitreduced polluting emissions, but also to achieve significant fuel economy.  In 2006, 64% of our employees participated in training activities.




Back to contents



savings.

Our total energy consumption amounted to 111171.89 million MWh in 2006, given2009, as a result of the development of the group’sour activities.



54



Back to Contents


Use of soils

In 2003, we integrated all activities relating to the treatment and recovery of sludge inwithin a single entity, (SEDE Environment).  This integration continued during 2004, resulting in the implementation during 2005 of indicators to measure the quality of sludge. This has resulted in our havingSEDE Environnement. As a specificresult, we have a precise, global and integrated overview of sludge management options, allowing usit to optimize ourits agricultural recovery in particular.

In this way we have pursuedWe continue our efforts to manage the quality of waste in the sewage networks and actedacts upstream to enhance the quality of sludge produced by implementing pollutant controls in our wastewater treatment networks (through ourits Actipol method). Veolia Eau has finalized a reference and certification systemguidelines defining therequirements applicable requirements for a sewage systemto wastewater treatment systems for the production of quality sludge to be used as compost.  As a second step,in agriculture. Upstream, we promote the agricultural recovery of sludge through composting and engage an independent certifying body to audit ourits composting and agricultural recovery networks.

This recovery is doneconducted in conjunction with the agricultural recovery of the fermentable fraction usable for fertilization fromof household waste.

We produced 8521,293.6 thousand tons of compost in 2006, 47%2009. 54% of whichsludge produced was eligible to be used in agricultural activities.

We have initiated a quality enhancement program for organic material produced from organic waste and a program to evaluate theirour agricultural impact (the Quali-Agro program led by CREEDCRPE – our center for research on wastefor environmental and energy services)services - in coordination with the INRA.INRA). We are also active in the rehabilitation of polluted soils. Relying onUsing several processes, including thermal absorption, Veolia Propreté processes almost all of the pollutants present in the soil at industrial sites.

Air Pollution

Limiting Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Certain of Dalkia’s activities (in particular its combustion installations with thermal output greater than 20 MW) are subject to the provisions of European Directivedirective 2003/87/EC of October 13, 2003, which establishes a quota exchange systeman allowance trading scheme for carbon gas emissions. This system has been in place among EU member states since the beginning of 2005. In addition, we are generally contributing to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions and have developed an action plan to improve the energy efficiency of our services. The action plan also calls for us to participate actively in the flexibility mechanisms set forth under the Kyoto protocol, which entered into force on February 16, 2005.

European Union, as amended by directive 2009/29/EC dated April 26, 2009. Direct greenhouse gas emissions (including biogas discharges) ongenerated at landfill sites) and indirect emissions (linked to energy use and heating purchases) at sites that we managed by us in 2006 reached 36.52009 amounted to 49.4 million tons of CO2CO2 (carbon dioxide) equivalent, due to the development of the group’s activities. our businesses.

Given the differing national and international methods for measuring the production and emission of methane at waste landfills,landfill sites, we are unable to provide a reliable measure at this time. We areWithin this context, we decided to further our knowledge of measuring methods, notably through participating in a working group that isgroups organized by international authorities (WBCSD and WRI). Work on elaborating and attempting to reconcile the different methods.  methods should lead to the identification of a single method, which can serve as a benchmark for all Veolia Propreté sites and enable uniform and comparable reporting.

We are also contributingcontributed to a reduction in CH4greenhouse gas emissions, throughfirstly by reducing our direct emissions and secondly by avoiding emissions which would have occurred without the implementationintervention of our businesses. Among the Group’s actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, Veolia Propreté continues to implement and optimize biogas collection and burning systems as well as biogas recovery systems inat its landfills. 64landfill sites. Ninety-four waste landfills overlandfill sites for which we control investmentsinvestment are equipped with biogas collection and processing systems. In 2009, our efforts contributed to a total decrease in emissions of 23.4 million tons of CO2.

Furthermore, we actively participate in the flexibility mechanisms outlined in the Kyoto protocol, which came into force on February 16, 2005. Veolia Propreté participates in the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions with Clean Development Mechanism (CDP) projects in Brazil, Mexico and Egypt for biogas collection and recovery systems.

Other Emissions

Installations that we operateoperated by us mainly emit sulfur and nitrogen oxides (SOX(SOx and NOX)NOX), carbon monoxide (CO), volatile organic compounds and dust. The methodEmissions of calculating emissions of SOXSOx from waste incineration units (hazardous and non-hazardous) was improved in 2006 and allowed us to estimate that these emissionsnon-hazardous waste) amounted to approximately 10691 grams per ton of incinerated waste in 2006.  We are2009, as a result a result of our growth by acquisition of new installations whose performance is still working towardsin the development of an indicator for NOX emissions.  For example,process if being optimized. In particular, Veolia Transportation,Transport is pursuing research, in partnership with ADEME, is pursuing a study to identifyinto identifying and assessassessing the market systems capable of reducing the NOX emissions of its buses and coaches.  Dalkia has also been conducting an evaluation program for several years on the various techniques available for reducing emissions (low emission burners, smoke recirculation, air staging, combustion modeling, etc.).

We attemptbest able to reduce ourNOx emissions in additionby its bus and coach fleet.



55



Back to complying with regulatory standards, by:

·

enhancing air pollution treatment and developing more effective treatment technologies, including treating smoke from our waste incineration units, enhancing the quality of emissions of our transport vehicles and utilizing low NOx combustion technology in the case of Dalkia’s activities, andContents


·

We are committed to reducing our emissions below regulatory requirements by (i) improving the treatment of air emissions and developing better technologies (treatment of incineration smoke by Veolia Propreté, reduction in vehicle emissions by Veolia Transport, low NOx -emission combustion technologies in Dalkia) and (ii) reducing consumption and favoringencouraging the use of cleancleaner fuels such as(low-sulfur fuel oil or low sulfurand coal, natural gas, natural gasLNG for combustion installations orand vehicles and electric or dual-modehybrid vehicles).

Furthermore, Veolia Transport continues its efforts to reduce polluting emissions (CO, HC, particles) from its fleet of passenger vehicles. A new benchmark was defined, corresponding to 80% of the 2009 bus and coach fleet. Emission reduction targets were set for the end of 2011: 8% for carbon monoxide unit emissions (CO), 24% for hydrocarbons (HC) and 27% for particles. Veolia Transport remains committed to providing drivers with environmental performance training, which notably enables a reduction in polluting emissions. In 2008, the number of employees having received training increased to 61%. With regards to NOx emissions, over the last few years Dalkia has carried out an evaluation program covering available technologies (fuel oil low emissions, recycling of fumes, air terracing, combustion modeling, etc.). The relative stability of this indicator compared to 2008 is based on the fact that it is now measured on a three year basis, rather than the five-year basis used previously. Moreover, the three years used have experienced relatively low growth.


We haveVeolia Propreté developed a semi-continuoussemi-permanent dioxin emission control method to monitor emissions of dioxins during waste incineration, allowing for a control of the aggregate flow of such pollutants emitted throughout the year. We offer this reliable and efficient measurement technique to all of our clients.


customers.

Noise and olfactory pollution


We have also developed new treatmentprocessing and storage techniques for odors, particularly in wastewater treatment plants and landfillslandfill sites for household waste. We also useuses new and more silent technologies in some of our installations, including special wall coatings, sound traps and exhaust gas exit silencers for cogeneration installations orand transport vehicles. The permanent increase in waste quantities around the world presents major risks for the environment.





Back to contents



Preserving biological balance, natural environments and protected animal and plant species

We integrated the protection of biodiversity into the first undertaking of our Sustainable Development Charter and since 2004 have developed an approach based on the nature of business impacts and the implementation of integrated management into the Environmental Management System.

To identify its impact, we call on an internal expert who is primarily responsible for analyzing biological tools used to evaluate the ecological state of marine and land life. Moreover, we work with a number of universities and institutions in order to further its knowledge through innovative research programs covering the interaction of its activities and the functioning of ecosystems.

We also carry out a management measures aimed at raising employee awareness and best practices. Such measures include the Geographical Biodiversity Information System, which enables the location of our main facilities to be precisely identified in relation to ecological hotspots (identified by the International Conservation Organization).

In order to improve the structure of its policies, we are currently working on defining a methodology enabling sites to carry out their own biodiversity appraisals and to implement an appropriate action plan.

In 2008, we entered into a partnership with the French Committee of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). The primary aim of this partnership will be to assist us with the integration of biodiversity into our corporate strategy, strengthen our R&D strategic cap thanks to a network of recognized experts and participate in raising awareness among our employees through training measures. IUCN France comprises 44 members (government ministries, public institutions and NGOs) and a network of approximately 250 experts. At the international level, IUCN has been a United Nations observer since 1999.

In France, numerous activities fall under the control of either the ICPE regime (facilities classified for environmental protection) or its equivalent. Therefore, all business development is conducted in connectiontandem with the realizationpreparation of environmental impact studies concerning very precise facets of floracomprising a highly detailed section on animal and fauna.plant life. The controlmanagement of these impacts therefore comprisesis, accordingly, a constant preoccupationconcern for the operating staff of our different business operationsbusinesses (waste treatment, decontamination stations, combustion facilities, railway depositories,rolling stock depots, etc.) In addition, our researchers closely follow the evolution of scientific debates on biodiversity in order.



56



Back to be able to identify the most pertinent indicators in our areas of activity.Contents



EvaluationEnvironmental evaluation or certification regarding the environment

Our activities have been subject to environmental certification, both external (ISO) and internal, for a long time. The number of our ISO 14001 certified sites has increased continuously since 1999.  In addition,2008, based on a wider application scope encompassing Veolia Propreté’s waste collection and cleaning businesses, we seekundertook to achieve the targets set by ourimplement an environmental management system on close to 80% for allin 85% of our installations, which lead, subjectrelevant activities by the end of 2011. Subject to the circumstances of each of the entities concerned, this voluntary approach leads to the general application of the ISO 14001 certification standards. WeSome 21,826 of our sites are currently have 853 sites covered by an ISO 14001 certification.certified.

Compliance with applicable legal and regulatory provisions

Our environmental management system includes, among other things, an environmental audit program that allows us to monitor our sites’the regulatory compliance of sites, as well as their compliance with contractual obligations and groupour standards. We have defined a general framework to ensure the consistency of the audit systems developed by our divisions, andits Divisions, each of our divisionswhich remains responsible for the definition and implementation of its own system. We surpassed our goalBased on this definition, we set an objective of conductingattaining, between now and 2011, 95% regulatory compliance in “priority installations” audited in the preceding 5 years. As of December 31, 2009, increased by 6%and the rate of regulatory compliance audits for 80% of priority sites in 2005.  carried out reached 87%.

Priority sites are drinking water production sites and urban wastewater treatment stations,plants, waste treatmentprocessing sites, Dalkia’sDalkia classified installations and several ofcertain Veolia Transport’s transportationTransport centers.  As of December 31, 2006, 80% of our primary facilities were subject to a regulatory compliance audit. These facilities are the most sensitive to environmental impacts.  As of December 31, 2006, 87% of the primary facilities were subject to a statutory auditing for compliance.

Expenses incurredInvestments undertaken to preserve the environment

Given the nature of ourits services, a large majority of our expenditures and investments have a direct impact on the environment. Our industrial investments amounted to €2.197 billion€2,493 million in 2006, which includes not only investments of a contractual nature, but also expenses incurred for research2009 and development,included growth and maintenance investments. We invested in employee training, our certification programprograms and the implementation of ourthe environmental management system. Our Research and Development budget was also renewed (see note 19 to the consolidated financial statements). Given the current economic environment, we are implementing a restrictive investment policy which sharply reduces our financial investments without jepordizing industrial investments or investments called for by contractual commitments. The decrease in investments primarily concerned Veolia Propreté.

InternalAs concerns the use of internal environmental management services, training and information for employees on the environment, methods for reducing environmental risks and organization for handlingthe structure implemented to handle accidents that may have public ramifications.

Preventionwith an impact beyond the confines of environmental risksthe Company, the following neasures should be noted:

In addition to the measures described above to reducefor the reduction of environmental risks, such as research and development or employee training, we have establishedset up an environmental department.Environmental Performance Department. This department ensures thatdepartment’s principal role is the roll-out and management of the Environmental Management System, thereby encouraging consistent objectives and actions of our divisions are consistent, particularly in connection withamong the implementation of the environmental management system, and encouragesDivisions as well as information sharing and best practices. It leadsheads an environmental committee, composedEnvironmental Management Committee, comprised of representatives of all of our divisionsDivisions and representatives from the Sustainable Development Department. A Steering Committee, headed by executive management and comprising an Executive Committee member from each Division and representatives from various departments (particularly ourthe sustainable development, legal and communicationR&D departments). will also be formed to approve the strategic cap adopted for envi ronmental management and to report to our Executive Committee on an annual basis. In addition, our risk department is in charge of identifying, assessing and managing risks. It relies on the work of the Group Risk Committee.

We have also establishedset up crisis management procedures that cover environmental crisis management, including, in particular, on-call and alarmalert systems at national and international levels, that would allowenabling any necessary measures to be taken as soon as possible.on a timely basis.

ReservesProvisions for site closure and guarantees for environmental riskspost-closure costs

As of December 31, 2006, our accrued reserves2009, provisions for site remediation amountedclosure and post-closure costs (encompassing provisions for site restoration, the dismantling of installations and environmental risks) totaled €686.3 million.



57



Back to €457.7 million.Contents


Indemnities and damagesCompensation paid in 2006 for2009 in execution of legal decisions relating to the environment and actions taken to repair environmental claims pursuant to court ordersdamage

ReservesProvisions for litigation consummatedused in 2006 amounted to €1052009 totaled €88.5 million, including all types of litigations (fiscal, sociallitigation (tax, employment and other litigation).

International environmental targets

We apply our EnvironmentThe roll-out of the Environmental Management System as described above, to nearly 80%continued in 2009 and now covers 78% of our subsidiaries, in France and outside of France.sites.

Intellectual Property

We own a significant number of patentsbrands, including the “Veolia” brand. Since November 2005, we have adopted a new brand strategy aimed at uniting the Water, Environmental Services and trademarksTransportation Divisions under the Veolia banner. Three of our Divisions remain identifiable according to their business descriptions: “Water”, “Environmental Services” or “Transportation”, while our Energy Services Division is mainly known under the name “Dalkia”. As a result, the companies at the head of the Water, Environmental Services and Transportation Divisions, as well as most companies in Francethe countries and other countries aroundregions where the world thatGroup is based, are progressively modifying their corporate names in order to include the word “Veolia”. This strategy, as implemented by our senior management, illustrates our desire to increase the global consistency of valueour Di visions and our visibility, by strengthening our identity and global culture based on our service values. Accordingly, the “Veolia” brand has become an international reference for trust, reliability and expertise in the Environmental Services sector.

Innovation is essential to our business.  However, we believe thatgrowth and profitability. We hold a portfolio of patents protecting the diversityknow-how of our patentsWater, Environmental Services, Transportation and trademarks does not make anyEnergy Services Divisions and also innovative discoveries of our activitiesResearch Department. With this patent portfolio and the associated expertise, we set ourselves apart from the competition and strengthen our position as a reference for Environmental Services.

We believe our business is not dependent on the existence or validity of one or several of these patents nor on any contract covering one or more intellectual property rights. Furthermore, we are not dependent on any one of these patentscustomer, major license or trademarks individually.industrial, commercial or financial supply contract.

Moreover, we believe that our activities are not materially dependent on any one license that we may own.  We also believe that we are not materially dependent upon any particular contract or customer.Seasonality




Back to contents



Marketing

We market our products and services by continuously offering to provide a more comprehensive range of environmental services to clients.  We often sell our products and services by responding to requests for consultations. These may be highly regulated events when it comes to a public authority conducting a public bid tender, but generally we are able in such situations to take advantageCertain of our reputation and know-how and propose a solution that is best adapted to a client’s needs.  In the absence of a formal bidding procedure, which is generally the rule for commercial clients, we analyze the environmental service needs of prospective clients and demonstrate to them how our services could improve the efficiency of their operations.  See “—  Contracts.” For more information regarding marketing efforts by each of our divisions, see “—  Our Services.”

Seasonality

Because of the diverse nature of our operations and our worldwide presence, our business is typically notbusinesses are subject to material seasonal variations. Our results are only slightly affected globally, with the exception of Veolia Energie (Dalkia), which realizesDalkia generates the bulk of its operating results in the first and fourth quarters of the year, corresponding to periods in which heating is used in Europe. In the waterWater sector, household water consumption and the related wastewater treatment services required tend to be more elevatedhigher between May and September in the northernNorthern hemisphere, where Veolia Eau conducts the majoritymost of its activity.  Inactivities. Finally, in transportation, SNCM’s activity is strongest in the summer season. Thanks to the diverse nature of our operations and our worldwide presence, our results are, in general, not significantly affected by seasonal variations.

Raw Materials

Given our business activites (Water, Environmental Services, Energy and Transportation), changes in the price of raw materials (mainly fuel and natural gas prices) and recycled materials (paper, cardboard, iron and non-ferous metals) can have an effect of our different Divisions.

Fuel prices (mainly gas and coal) can be subject to significant fluctuations. Energy prices have fluctuated widely in the past few years. After risinga lull at the end of 2006, the price of a barrel of Brent crude nearly tripled from its low in January 2007 (US$49.00) to its high in the summer of 2008 (US $145), spurred by over 45 %fears of potential supply problems in 2005,light of geopolitical tensions within the reference Brentmajor oil price increased by almost 20% in 2006.  Even if prices have started to decrease sinceproducing countries (Nigeria, Venezuela) and the startreluctance of OPEC (Organization of the 2007 fiscal year,Petroleum Exporting Countries) to raise production quotas in response to strong global growth. During the fourth quarter of 2008, following the eruption of the global economic crisis, the price fluctuations remainof crude oil plummeted, falling in just two months to below its level at the beginning of the year. In 2009, despite a twofold increase in the price of crude oil (US$78.30 as of December 31, 2009) compar ed to its low in February 2009 (US$39.50), the average price of North Sea Brent crude oil in 2009 (US$61.90) remained below that of 2008 (US$97.20). This change in the price of Brent crude oil not only had an effect on fuel prices, but also on gas prices (particularly in France, where changes in STS gas prices track petroleum prices with a three month lag). Thus average 2009 French gas prices also went down by about €9/MW compared to 2008, which represents a decreased of 27%. The general consensus of opinion among energy product analysts is, however, that energy price will increase significantly in the long-term, due to the increasing rarity of known oil reserves, a marked increase in extraction costs and the need to adopt new energy sources in response to growing environmental requirements. However, the timing of this upturn is difficult to anticipate.forecast, due to the limited visibility of market participants regarding economic growth. Therefore, the possibility of a further drop in commodity prices cannot b e excluded. In any event, as in 2008 and 2009, energy prices should remain volatile in 2010.



58



Back to Contents


In 2006, we recorded a net chargethis context of approximately €36 million relatedvolatile raw materials commodity markets, Veolia Environnement’s businesses are not, and should not in the future, be materially affected in the long-term by an increase in costs, the availability of fuel or fluctuations in the price of other raw materials. The contracts entered into by Veolia Environnement generally include price review and/or indexation clauses which enable it to pass on the majority of any increases in commodity or fuel prices to the increase in energy prices (€6 million for Veolia Transport, €13 million for Dalkia, €11 million for Veolia Propreté and €6million for Veolia Eau).  We were ableprice of services sold to limit our additional charges tocustomers, even if this amount since our contracts typically contain price adjustment and/or indexing provisions designed to compensate us for increases in the cost of providing our services.  Such provisions include indexing clauses that take into account the variation of certain parameters, review clauses in the case ofmay be performed with a rise in certain parameters above a given level, hardship clauses (unforeseeable changes due to extraordinary circumstances) or re-equilibrium clauses. These provisions therefore assist us in passing along a portion of any rise in energy or raw material prices to clients (subject to a possible time period in which we would have to await the impact of price adjustment).delay.

In the transportation division,Transportation Division, numerous contracts contain indexing clauses that take variationsfluctuations in fuel costs into account, which significantly reducesreducing the impact of a rise or fall in fuel prices. In certain contracts, especially those involvingcontracts entered into in the United States, we areVeolia Environnement is entitled to full compensation in the event of risinga rise in fuel prices. Approximately 70% of costs are covered by contractual indexing clauses. For those contracts not containing indexing clauses, a fuel hedging policy was implemented in 2008 to manage fluctuations in fuel costs. The Group uses derivative instruments for this purpose, whose characteristics (notional amounts and maturity) are defined in accordance with forecast fuel requirements (based on firm orders or highly probable forecast flows). The majority of derivatives used are swaps.

In the waste management division,Environmental Services Division, collection services involving non-hazardous solid and liquid waste are the most sensitive to fluctuations in fuel prices. However, for clientscustomers that have contracts with us,Veolia Environnement, indexing clauses in thosetheir contracts generally allow usthe Company to pass alongon a goodsignificant portion of our increaseincreases in such costs into the prices we charge to clients.charged. Approximately two-thirds of costs are covered contractually. For clientscustomers not bound by contract, increases in fuel costs are either fully or partially passed along to clientson through an updating of tariffsincrease in fees or through commercial negotiation.

In the Transportation and Environmental Services Divisions, the fall in fuel prices in 2009 compared to 2008 had a positive impact on fuel expenses of approximately €67 million in 2009, including the cost of swap hedging arrangements.

In the Energy Services Division, given the long-term nature of the contract terms and terms of supply agreements, the changes in energy services division,prices may have different affects depending on the situationzones in which Dalkia intervenes. At the Energy Services Division level, it has an overall negative impact on revenue of €140 million; this translates, however, to a negative effect in France and the United States, but a positive impact in Central Europe and the Baltic States.

A portion of Environmental Services Division revenue is generated by its sorting-recycling and trading businesses, which are particularly sensitive to fluctuations in the price of secondary raw materials (paper, cardboard, ferrous and non-ferrous metal). The economic crisis in 2009 impacted demand for recycled materials, and the average annual price of these secondary materials fell substantially compared to 2008, despite a progressive rise in paper and cardboard prices from the third quarter of 2009. The results of the Environmental Services Division were therefore impacted in 2009 by the substantial fall in the price of secondary raw materials compared to 2008.

In the other Divisions, as part of supply management and cost optimization measures, certain Group subsidiaries may be required, depending on their businesses, to contract forward purchases or sales of commodities (gas, electricity).

The Group also entered into long-term contracts for the purchase of gas, coal, electricity and biomass in order to secure its supply chain. The majority of these commitments is reciprocal, with the third parties concerned required to deliver the quantities indicated in these contracts and the Group obliged to take them.

Finally, with respect to combustible materials used forits building activities, is similarparticularly in the Water Division, the Group may also purchase financial instruments to hedge against increases in the price of nickel and copper notably. For further information, please refer to our Consolidated Financial Statements, particularly Note 29.1.3 to the description above. With respectconsolidated financial statements.



59



Back to gas supplies in particular, the deregulation of the market has not altered our use of indexing clauses in our contracts. We have developed the skills necessary to manage and optimize our gas supplies within the new market environment.Contents


Insurance

Objectives of Insurance Procurement Policy

Our insurance procurement policy, for all of our operating divisionsDivisions, has the following objectives:

·

maintainingsubscribing common insurance policies to establishimplement a coherent risk transfer and coverage policy anddesigned to maximize economies of scale, while taking into account the specificitiesspecific characteristics of ourthe Group’s businesses and legal or contractual constraints; and

·

optimizing the thresholds and the means for accessing the insurance or reinsurance markets through use of varying deductibles or acceptance of a primary layer of retention through our insurance subsidiary located in Ireland, Codeve Insurance Company Limited.


In 2006, we continued to seek to optimize the amount of insurance premiums we paid to outside insurers.appropriate deductibles.

Implementation of Insurance Procurement Policy

Policy

Our strategy with respect toThe aim of Veolia Environnement’s insurance procurementpolicy is to (i) establishimplement a global insurance procurementcoverage policy to cover our activities,encompassing all Group businesses, based notably on the needs expressed by our subsidiaries, in particular, (ii) select and sign contractspolicies with outsideexternal providers (brokers, insurers, loss adjusters, etc.), (iii) manage consolidated subsidiaries specializing in insurance or reinsurance coverage, and (iv) leadmanage and coordinate the network of insurance managers present among our principalin the main subsidiaries.




Back to contents



Implementation

The implementationpolicy of ancovering risks through insurance procurement policy aimed at covering risk is effectedimplemented in coordination with ourVeolia Environnement’s global risk management process. Implementation takes into account the insurability of risks related to ourassociated with Veolia Environnement’s activities, by the market availability of insurance and reinsurance coverage on the market and by the relationship between premiums andproposed compared with the level of coverage, exclusions, limits, sub-limits and deductibles.

We undertookThe main actions undertaken in 2006 principally related to:2009 primarily concerned:

·

the determinationextension, at equivalent or improved terms and conditions, of retention levels on the basis of an analysis of risksinsurance programs covering property damage and loss history and an evaluation of the costs and coverage proposed by insurers;operating losses,


·

the continuation of efforts to identify, prevent and protect against risks, thanks in particular tothrough a rating system for the “property damage and business interruption” risk profile forof our most important facilities;facilities throughout the world;


·

the communicationongoing roll-out of detailed information regarding our company to the insurance and reinsurance markets;Group programs;


·

the renegotiation of contracts, in particular to strengthen our civil and pollution liability coverage;


·

extending the adoption of the group’s coverage; and


·

the organization of broker services for the placement and administration of ourGroup insurance programs.



60



Back to Contents


Main Group Insurance Policies

CivilGeneral Liability

A civilThe general third-party liability and environmental damage program was subscribed torenegotiated on July 1, 2005, around2008, for the whole world (excluding the U.S. and Canada) for a period of three years. PrincipalInitial coverage isof up to €50€100 million per claim and per year. Foryear was subscribed. In the U.S. and Canada, differentseveral contracts cover civilthird-party liability and environmental damage to the environment on behalf of groupfor Group subsidiaries, based on local conditions, in an amount of up to US$a maximum of U.S.$50 million per claim and per year.

For all groupGroup subsidiaries worldwide, an insurance program provides excess coverage forof up to US$450€400 million thereby giving us totalper claim and per year, in addition to the basic coverage of US$500€100 million throughoutoutside the insurance period.U.S. and Canada and of €450 million in the U.S. and Canada in addition to the basic coverage of U.S.$50 million in these countries. This program includes coverage forencompasses liability resulting from environmental liability for damage sustained by third parties as a result of a sudden and accidental event.

Finally a civilThird-party liability coverage for terrorism policy was subscribed underterrorist acts is included in the civilgeneral liability program, which was set-up for three years on July 1, 2006 for total2008, with coverage of US $165up to €150 million per claim and per year.year, excluding the U.S. and Canada. Coverage for the U.S. and Canada is €100 million per claim and per year, in addition to coverage of U.S.$50 million.

Further, certainCertain activities, such as a maritime transport, automobile and construction, have their own specific insurance policies.

Property DamagesDamage and Business Interruption Policies

All four of our divisions maintainVeolia Environnement Divisions are covered by property damage insurance policies, to cover assets thatinsuring the installations they own as well as those that they operate on behalf of clients.  Some policies, whether or not they are included in our globalcustomers. The Group insurance company provideprogram provides either “business interruption” coverage or “additional cost of working”operating cost” coverage depending on such subsidiaries’ exposure and their capacityeach subsidiary’s ability to use internal or external solutions to ensure service continuity. These policies contain standard insurance market terms.

The Group damage insurance program, initially set-up on January 1, 2007 for a period of three years, was extended to January 1, 2012 to maintain existing competitive insurance coverage.

The level of premiums, deductibles and sub-limits for exceptional socio-political or natural events reflects the terms proposed, or sometimes imposed,required, by insurers in the markets in which the risk is underwritten. Group insurance coverage implemented on January 1, 2006 carries a limit per claimevent of up to €300 million.million per claim. Some of this coverage contains further underlying li mitsincludes additional sub-limits per claim or per year.

Self-Insured Retention and Deductibles

For any insured claim or loss, we remainVeolia Environnement remains liable for the deductible amount.  Theamount set out in the policy. This amount may range from several thousand euros to more than one million euros.

In 2006, Codeve Insurance Company Limited has underwritten, our insuranceSince January 1, 2009, the Group self-insurance system is entirely based on its reinsurance subsidiary, had a conservation (retained risk)Veolia Environnement Services-Ré, which retains self-insured risk of €10€1.5 million per claim for the coverage of third-party liability risk and €2.5 million per clam for the coverage of property damage risk and resulting financial losses. For both property damage and consequent financial losses, and €5 million for insurance of civil liabilities.

Regarding both damages and civilthird-party liability, Codeve Insurance Company LimitedVeolia Environnement Services-Ré has put in placeset-up reinsurance contracts in orderpolicies to limit its exposure to frequency risks (“stop loss”-type contracts) and risks tied to intensity (excess claim-type(excess-type contracts).

In general, theThe insurance coveragepolicy described above is constantly evolves as a functionchanging in response to the ongoing appraisal of ongoing risk evaluation,risks, market conditions and available insurance coverage available.capacity. We attemptseek to have our knownensure that the main accidental orand operating risks brought to our attention are covered by the insurance markets, when thiswhere insurance is available on the market exists whenand it is economically feasible to do so. However, we cannot guarantee that we will not suffer damages or losses that are not fully or partially covered by insurance.



61



Back to contentsContents



ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

Our companyCompany is divided into four operating divisionsDivisions corresponding to each of our four business segments and a number of centralized corporate departments that lead and coordinate the actions of teams present in each of the four operating divisions. We believe that this organizational structure encourages the coherent development of our groupGroup by reinforcing its identity, maintaining solidarity and cohesion, favoring economies of scale and encouraging professionalism through the sharing of best practices.

See “—Item 4: “Information on the Company — History and Development of the Company” for a description of the history of the creation of our organizational structure.

PROPERTY, PLANTSPLANT AND EQUIPMENT

We useVeolia Environnement uses various assets and equipment for the conduct of its activities, over which it exercises extremely diverse rights.

The total gross value of our non-current assets (excluding other intangible assets) as of December 31, 2009 was €30,824.3 million (net value of €18,659 million as of December 31, 2009, representing 38% of total consolidated assets), compared to €30,239 million as of December 31, 2008 (net value of €18,816 million).

Under concession arrangements, we provide public interest services (distribution of drinking water and heat, public transportation networks, household waste collection, etc.) to communities, in orderreturn for payment of services rendered. We usually manage these collective services (also referred to conduct our activities, with respectas general interest services, general economic interest services and public services) under contracts entered into at the request of public entities that keep the control of assets used to which we have very different rights.  

We have relatively little real estate that we own outright.  Mostperform such collective services. Concession arrangements are characterized by the transfer of operating rights for a fixed term, under the time, the buildingscontrol of a public authority, and are performed using special-purpose installations that we use do not belongbuild or that are placed at our disposal either free of charge or for consideration. Installations normally consist of pipelines, water treatment and purification plants, pumps , etc. in the Water Division, incineration plants in the Environmental Services Division, and urban heating networks and heating and co-generation plants in the Energy Services Division.

We are generally contractually bound to us; instead, their use is governed by fixed-term contracts pursuant to which we agree to provide various services to clients. Atmaintain and repair installation assets managed under public service contracts. When necessary, related repair and maintenance costs are provided via provisions for contractual commitments in the outsetevent of delays in the performance of work. The nature and extent of the contract,Group’s rights and obligations under these different contracts vary according to the client generally grants uspublic services rendered by the different Group businesses.

Under outsourcing contracts with industrial clients, BOT (Build, Operate, Transfer) contracts or incineration or cogeneration contracts, we may grant customers the right to use any pre-existing buildings and installationsa group of assets in return for the duration of the contract. In the event that we initially investrent included in the construction of certain facilities, thetotal contract generally calls for the facilityremuneration. Pursuant to be returned to the client orIFRIC 4, we thus become a lessor with respect to our successor upon completion ofcustomers. The corresponding assets are therefore recorded in the contract term. Duringconsolidated balance sheet as operating financial assets.

The Group is also the contract term, we may or may not be the legaloutright owner of assets, depending on the legal system involved, however, we are nearly always responsible for these assets, which we are required to maintain and sometimes rehabilitate.  

We are occasionally the full owner of real property, including industrial installations, in particular for activities undertaken outside global contracts. Incomprehensive contracts in the Environmental Services Division (landfill sites and special waste processing plants), the Energy Services Division (co-generation plants) and the Transportation Division (buses, boats and trains). These assets are classified in the consolidated balance sheet as property, plant and equipment. Our property, plant and equipment are subject to certain charges, such as maintenance and repair costs and closure or post-closure costs.

There are relatively few real estate assets legally owned by the Group without any retrocession obligations. When possible, we do not own our waste management division, for example (CSDUs, storage centers for ultimate waste),office buildings.

Finally, assets purchased under finance leases fall into all three asset categories detailed above and in our energy services (co-generation plants)represented a net amount of €795 million as of December 31, 2009 (see Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements).

We strive notThe main insurance policies subscribed by the Company are described in the Insurance section above.

Environmental issues may also influence the Company’s use of property, plant and equipment, as detailed in the heading Environmental Regulations, Policies and Compliance, above.



62



Back to be the owner of any office buildings. Accordingly, we rent a building located at 36/38, avenue Kléber, 75116, Paris, France that we use as our corporate headquarters.  Our and our divisions’ senior management have maintained their offices in this building since May 2002, where certain central functions are performed.Contents


RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (R&D)

We have identified three main elements in itsOur activities are at the crossroads of several major challenges facing the modern world: demographic explosion and urbanization, access to water, fighting climatic change. The solution to these challenges requires a global industrial and technological approach. This transversal approach lies at the core of our Research and DevelopmentInnovation (R&D) strategy relating&I) strategy.

If technology did not advance, we would not be able to meet today’s challenges. It is therefore only by leaning fully on the capacity for innovation of our research teams that the Group plans to rise to the environmental challenge, by proposing innovative solutions at an affordable cost.

The four-pronged approach of the R&I department composed of the following: (i) managing and preserving resources, (ii) limiting impacts on the environment, (iii) improving the quality of life of populations and (iv) developing renewable energies sources. Fighting against climate change also occupies a leading place in this framework. Research efforts are concentrated on optimizing energy consumption at Group installations, developing alternative energy sources (bioenergies, biomass, waste-to-energy, alternative fuels), the desalination of sea water and the improvement of treatment processes, the prevention of legionnaires’ disease, the recycling of urban waste, the capture and storage of carbon dioxide and the optimization of urban transportation.

In each of these areas, our know-how and technologies are complementary. This is the case, for example, in the areas of sludge, biomass, biofuels, prevention of legionnaires’ disease and the treatment of industrial effluents.

In addition, by mobilizing a network of international experts and implementing research programs at test sites around the world, Veolia Environnement benefits from solutions to specific local problems and contexts that may be applied to other regions of the world.

The Reorganization of Research and Innovation Activities

To accompany its R&I ambitions, our Research and Innovation department decided to adopt a new operating approach in July 2009, based on a worldwide scale (demographic, urbanmatrix structure founded on seven departments (life sciences, environment and health, analysis, modeling / process implementation and information technology, process engineering, energy challenges):  (i) anticipatingand processes and design and engineering) and nine programs (bioresources, waste collection, sorting and beneficial re-use, drinking water, wastewater, energy production and efficiency, sustainable building and city management, transportation, new activities, and environmental and health standards). This new structure seeks to redeploy R&I efforts in order to break down barriers between research units and pool resources across transversal subjects. The scientific and technical teams of the needsfour Divisions now report directly to a single management structure comprising seven departments representing the Group’s main disciplines. Therefore, water and waste biologists will now work together directly. By organizing its teams by area of clients, (ii) managing securityexpertise, the R&I Department will encourage new synergies and (iii)be better placed to develop outside partnerships.

In addition to giving our experts sufficient time to concentrate on scientific aspects, a programs department is now responsible for defining lines of research and ensuring the budget monitoring and management of each project and the roll-out of innovations in the field.

At the same time, the research system was strengthened upstream with the creation of a Watch and Innovation department. This department is primarily charged with identifying new inventions in each business and promoting environmental protectionthem within the Group. More generally, it is responsible for identifying innovations around the world, which are likely to be developed and preservation.  integrated into our activities.



63



R&D plays an important role in the evolution of our business and its business model through our global, yet specialized vision of the environment. The responsibility of R&D isBack to devise and put in place technological developments which will considerably modify the concepts and the implementation of our businesses in the coming years.


For us, the challenges of tomorrow concerning the environment are industrial challenges in the sense of technological developments. The responsibility of R&D is to identify these industrial challenges and to allow us to stay at the cusp of technological developments.  


In order to respond to today’s problems as well as those of tomorrow, our R&D focuses its efforts on the protection of water resources, future energy sources and the future of transportation, with a budget, means and expertise that will continue to grow into the future.Contents


Research and DevelopmentInnovation Resources

Research and Development is not simply an objective but also a financial and human commitment, put into place by us to act practically and effectively.

Our R&Dresearch activities are overseen by our Research, Development and Technology department, or “Research Department”Veolia Environnement Recherche et Innovation (VERI). In 2006, this department consisted of2009, these R&I activities comprised nearly 700 expertsworldwide850 experts worldwide (including 350425 researchers and 350425 on-site developers), with a total budget of about €115approximately €89.8 million.1

The research departmentVeolia Environnement Research Department works on behalf of all of our group’s divisions, given thatGroup Divisions, as their needs are similar. In particular, all seek to solve environmental and health problems with the aidsupport of numerous tools, such as modeling and chemical and bacteriological analysis. By working on behalf of all divisions,Divisions, the research departmentResearch Department helps to ensure a better consistency within theof R&D activities with our group’sthe Group’s strategy.

1

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, research costs totaled €66.4 million, which, when added to operational development costs, totaled an estimated budget of  €115 million.




Back to contents



We have four main research centers that operate in a network. Located in the Greater Paris region and specializing in water, waste, energy and transportation, the centers have related units and correspondents in France with branches abroad:and abroad (United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, and United States).

·

The environmental services and energy research center(Creed), based in Limay, with branches in the United Kingdom and Australia;


·

The transportation, environmental and health research center, based in Paris;


·

The water research center,1 based in Maisons-Laffitte, with branches in Germany, the United States and Australia; and


·

The analysis research center, based in Saint-Maurice. The central laboratory, named the Environmental Analysis Center (CAE), has a microbiology and chemistry analysis research laboratory.

We establishedIn 2003, we set up an international network of Research and Development correspondent network in 2003 in orderInnovation officers, to identify innovation needs in each region of the world and analyze specificcommunicate local technical development and innovation needs.developments. Certain research centers abroad have acquired specialized expertise and are partnershave partnered with centers in France. These research units help to highlight ourhave become showcases for Veolia Environnement’s technological expertise. In the area of water for example,Water sector, the Berlin Water Center (Kompetenzzentrum Wasser Berlin) is a center of Competence for Water (KompetenzZentrum Wasser) is the reference pointexcellence for the protection of water resources. Australia has become the reference point for information relating to the recycling of water.

A strategic committee for research, innovation and sustainable development was created by the board of directors of the Company in September 2006. This committee evaluates the long-term Research and Development policies proposed by the relevant departments of the Company and the Group and advises the board of directors of the Company. The committee is informed of important programs and businesses and evaluates the results. In particular, it evaluates the budget and workforce and advises on the allocation of the means and resources and their adequacyour activities in Australia have become a benchmark for the Group’s strategy in this area.

Main activities in the domainsreuse of Research and Development

Our Research and Development focuses on the following seven main areas:


·

Water: preservation of water resources, drinking water (from its production to distribution), water and wastewater treatment (treatment of urban and sediment wastewater, odor treatment) and industrial water.


·

Energy: optimization of energy services, including alternative or renewable energy (fuel cells, the timber industry and solar sensors).


·

Environmental Services: sorting and treatment of waste (incineration, co-incineration and technical landfill sites) and valorization of waste.


·

Transport: logistics, ticketing, monetics, design of a zero emission vehicle, new services linked to public transport (informational systems, for both operator and passenger).


·

Analysis: development of analytical techniques in microbiology and chemistry that are faster and more precise, and improvement of already existing methods.


·

Health: evaluation of risks linked to environmental pollution and the sanitary benefits linked to our businesses, identification of emerging sanitary dangers and establishement of sanitary indicators. The health department is also a recognized partner for public health bodies and institutions such as theInstitut de Veille Sanitaire,Direction Générale de la Santé, AFSSE or INSERM.


·

Environment: assessment of the environmental impact of our activities and conduct of our Environmental Management System (follow-up, monitoring and reporting of the Group’s environmental data and contribution to commercial offers).  


Each of these activities helps to anticipate the needs and constraints linked to regulatory changes. For us, the objective of the organization as implemented is not only to satisfy current sanitary and environmental requirements, but also to follow sanitary and environmental authorities concerns which will necessarily impact reglementation in the future.

A network of information experts within the research department manages our group’s scientific and technical information and places at employees’ disposal tools for technical, commercial and regulatory monitoring.

1

The Water Research Center is the historical center of Veolia Eau – Compagnie Générale des Eaux. The European Commission was awarded the “Marie Curie Center of Excellence” label for its membrane, disinfecting and modeling technology. The Anjou research center includes an expert center on membranes (ARAMIS), which evaluates the performance of membranes so as to improve operating conditions.




Back to contents



wastewater.

Innovation: a rationalized methodapproach

The research team aimsteams seek to provide innovative practical solutions within their areas of expertise, which are crucial for the competitivenessour competitiveness. R&I is carried out as part of our group. Research and Development is driven by a rationalized method allowingapproach enabling technological risks to be mastered,controlled and allowingenabling rapid progress and the creation of successful commercial applications that are both reliable and effective.

The main steps1 in the innovation process are:

·

Strict regulatory, technologicalmonitoring of regulations and, commercial monitoring thattechnology as well as the competition enables usthe Group to anticipateforesee future needs and proceed with the launch of new research programs as quickly as possible.  possible;

Laboratory or field tests are then carried out to verify the feasibility of the research. At this stage, analytical modeling2 may be carried out, depending on the circumstances (i.e.(i.e., exploring functionality and cost containment potential).while containing costs);


·

If the tests are successful, a prototype is built in the laboratory or on site in order to evaluate and refine the technology.technology;


·

The next phase is the development of a pre-industrial unit to be installed on aat an appropriate site and operated by personnel.


ForAt each of the stepsstep in the innovation process, the collaboration of various entitiesparties (research teams, university or private laboratories) are called upon to collaborate.is necessary and determines the successful outcome of the research project.

Our researchersVeolia Environnement’s R&I teams are part of an international network of researchers. They forge fundamental links with otherfundamental research teams, each taking advantage ofdrawing benefit from the expertise of the others.colleagues. While these collaborations enrichthis collaboration enriches the knowledge of the research groupGroup R&I department and keepkeeps it up to date, theyinformed of recent developments, it also provideprovides effective prospectsoutlets for scientific advancementprogress and return onfeedback to our partners experience. Research and Developmentpartners. R&I teams also workswork with several top universities and participatesparticipate in research programs forled by national and international institutions. ResearchersThey also sharesshare their technological knowledge with industrial actors.   players.

Certain principal research themes

Today, new environmental issues, especially in the energy sector, call1

Research and development expenditure totaled €89.8 million for the creation of significantfiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (see Note 19 to our consolidated financial statements) and innovative technological solutions. Approximately 30 to 40% of the investment  in Research will henceforth be allocated torepresents, together with other operational development costs, a smaller number of programs, with a view to achieving major technological improvements. These different programs will enable us to remaintotal budget estimated at the forefront of technological developments.

Desalination: a largely available alternative resource  

Several regions around the world consider the desalination of seawater the major method of producing drinking water. Desalination consists of producing fresh water from seawater or brackish water. As a result of difficulties facing countries with water problems (a lack of a fresh water source), this market is being developed in particular for the processes of desalination, which use the membranous process (a process involving reverse osmosis). The main problem facing the membranes is the risk of clogging.

The objective of Research and Development regarding desalination by reverse osmosis relates to the pretreatment of seawater to limit clogging of the membrane and on the reduction in energy consumption in order to further reduce the cost of desalination (which has already been divided by 4 in 10 years) and to contribute to environmentally friendly developments. Research is carried out at theCentre d’Expertise Membrane of our Water Research Center to identify what causes clogging and to recommend solutions regarding the treatment of water. Moreover, a pilot scheme has been installed at the Toulon Cap Sicié site which will allow for the optimization of the filtering process for the pretreatment of seawater. R&D has also developed a pilot platform in the Persian Golf, which will be operational in the second half of 2007, which will allow for the comparison of different pretreatment options and validate new ideas.  

Sorting and Recycling: a strategic step in waste management

Sorting is a strategic step in waste management, and especially in recycling. The efficiency of the treatments and the possibility of revalorization (product, agronomical and energy valorization) is dependent on the quality of sorting. The sorting processes of our group must be optimized, in addition to the separation carried out by cleaners and companies.

Our research aims to automate sorting plants, to secure procedures of waste treatment, and to make the manufacturing and utilization of CSR (Combustibles Solides de Recuperation) viable. A pilot plant reproducing a sorting machine’s conditions has been built on the site at Rillieux-la-Pape (69). This plant has already allowed for a measurement to be taken of the performance of an optical sorting machine in order to research possible improvements and to simulate results.

The European bus of the future: a clean, intelligent and modern bus

Buses must evolve so that passengers are offered a wide range of quality services, adapted to contemporary living. This is indispensable for the reinforcement of a positive image of buses and public transportation. Areas of focus of improvement include new designs (the future European bus program), improving commercial speed (bus lanes, importance of clean sites and buses), air quality improvement (Euro4), decrease in gas consumption (hybridization), and reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.

Over the past five years our research has aimed to define, with several European transport operators, its functional innovations, while maintaining comfort, traveler information, accessibility, driving assistance and maintenance. The results of this research were€150 million.

12

At each step of the innovation process, researchers implement sophisticated tools, such as digital fluid mechanics. This technology enables researchers to simulate the runningoperation of installations and test a greaterlarger number of scenarios to improve efficiency. Over a shorter period, such software enables researchers to optimize test protocols.protocols for process development.



64





Back to contentsContents



communicatedMain Research & Development Areas

The four areas at the core of Veolia Environnement’s current Research and Innovation are:

Managing and preserving natural resources

The sector that will be most affected by climate change is Water. Research into sea water desalination processes, collection of rain water and the re-use of wastewater after treatment, is aimed at meeting the expected increase in water requirements. In order to constructorspreserve natural resources, it is also essential to find solutions to decrease consumption. The mechanization and automation of sorting processes for used materials, as well as the design of recycling processes for end-of-life products or industrial effluents, encourage in this way the re-use and recovery of materials found in waste at a competitive cost.

Limiting environmental impacts

The improvement of treatment techniques for industrial effluents and hazardous waste makes it possible to limit the dispersion of pollutants in the environment and better respect biodiversity and public health. As a leader in Environmental Services, we must set the example with regards to reducing the impact of its activities. Current efforts are therefore focused on reducing emissions from our facilities, decreasing noise and olfactory pollution and developing even cleaner means of transportation.

Improving quality of life worldwide

The perfecting of wastewater depollution and waste management systems tailored to developing countries improves the environmental safety of non-Western cities and helps prevent epidemics from spreading on a worldwide scale. It also preserves the quality of water and thus the health of those who consume it. Along with the UITP (development of clean means of transportation, the organization of mass transportation reduces greenhouse gas emissions and atmospheric pollution. It also improves living conditions in major cities and encourages economic development in emerging countries.

Union Internationale de Transports PublicsDeveloping alternative energy sources), with Predit (Programme de Recherche et d’Innovation dans les transpors terrestres)

As carbon dioxide emissions continue to exceed the absorption capacity of the biosphere, the production of substitute fuels and biofuels, the recovery of biomass as energy, the development of industrial applications for fuel cells and the CEN (optimization of the performance of our waste incineration plants help limit greenhouse gas emissions. These measures also help respond to the increasing global demand for energy and address the depletion of fossil fuel reserves by replacing them with clean energies.

Over 70% of our research programs thereby contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions, bearing witness to the Group’s strong commitment to fighting climate change. Current processes seek to eliminate greenhouse gas emissions or, where this is not possible, reduce emission levels. To this end, R&I activities focus primarily on reducing emissions, improving processes and energetic efficiency and exploiting more renewable energy sources. At the same time, the Group is striving to implement processes to capture, store and recover greenhouse gases and foresee future constraints relating to climate change.

Commission Européenne de NormalisationImprovements for 2009

Veolia Environnement partnership with the Cleantech network

Veolia Environnement, highly reputed for its ability to integrate technology solutions beneficial to the environment, decided to join forces with the Cleantech Group for two years as a preferred partner.

Cleantech (abbreviation of “clean technology”) is a term used to describe technologies providing environmental added-value, primarily in terms of the ecological footprint and eco-design, but also with respect to energy efficiency. Currently, numerous start-ups founded on the development of cleantech have emerged across the globe and particularly in the United States in Sillicon Valley. While these young companies sometimes harbor extremely innovative approaches and solutions, they are not always able to complete the innovation process and roll-out their solutions, due to a lack of resources and contacts.

Cleantech Group is a global network of over 2,000 start-ups and investors working on innovative environmental technologies. The network comes together several times a year in all continents to share major advances in green technologies. In 2010, we participated in the San Francisco Forum from February 24 to February 26 and will participate in the Paris Forum from April 26 to April 28. In this way, we intend to promote our technology watch system and further strengthen our innovation process.



65



Back to Contents


Development of tools to identify and capture odorant components in tap water

The “bad taste” of tap water is not an indication of sanitary risk but is a deterrent to consumption. An exceedingly minute quantity of odorant components is sufficient to produce a bad smell or an unusual taste.

As a Water specialist, Veolia Environnement decided to attack these problems head on. After defining the problems and the challenges, the research teams successfully perfected three tools (based on Twister technology) to detect, extract and identify the components responsible for the taste and/or smell problems of drinking water:

ARISTOT (Advanced and Relevant Investigation Sampler for Taste & Odor at Tap): initially called “Twister Tap”, this tool captures organic components and particularly odorant components directly at the consumer’s tap;

PLATON (Programmable and Local Analysis of Taste & Odor in Networks): initially called “Twister Network” or “Integrator”, this tool traps organic components in network water;

ISOCRATE (In Situ Off-flavors Capture by Recurring and Automated Twister Extractions): this tool extracts molecules in a network or reservoir (surface water, plant, etc).

Hydrogen “doping” system for cogeneration engines

With primary energy savings of 40% and a decrease in greenhouse gas emissions of up to 30%, the energy efficiency performance of cogeneration is excellent. Cogeneration power plants are generally used to supply heating networks for public and private buildings, such as hospitals, schools or office or residential buildings.

Today, a country like Denmark produces over 50% of its electricity by cogeneration, compared to only 3% in France, at a time when the optimal performance of power plants would appear to have hit a ceiling. In order to improve the attraction and efficiency of cogeneration engines, Veolia Environnement R&I perfected and patented a procedure to “dope” the engines by injecting hydrogen. Thanks to the local production of hydrogen using catalytic effect, the research teams successfully increased gas-engine combustion efficiency, to produce more electrical and thermal energy from the same quantity of natural gas. This procedure could become widely available as it requires only limited investment and can be implemented without a fundamental change to existing installations.

Development of an ecodriving assistant to optimize fuel consumption and CO2 emissions in Veolia fleet vehicles

Veolia Transport has enabledalways sought to minimize its impact on the environment. This has led to the use of proprietary measurement tools (such as the Eco-Efficient Travel1 indicator) and produced concrete and quantifiable results: 4.1 million metric tons of CO2 equivalents avoided in 2009.

In a effort to reduce fuel consumption and CO2 emissions of our fleet vehicles even further, our experts noted a 35% differential in fuel consumption between the two extremes in driving styles – very environmentally-friendly and extremely sporty. Based on this observation, and after three years of research, our experts produced an ecodriving assistant, which enables a further reduction in the fuel consumption and CO2 emissions of the Veolia fleet.

The ecodriving assistant uses pre-recorded algorithms to process a range of parameters, model changes in the vehicle and calculate in real-time the optimal speed and acceleration. The man-machine interface then reports a simple and intuitive instruction to the driver using a system of diodes. Green lights indicate that the driver is appropriately controlling his/her speed and acceleration. Conversely, when the driver drives too fast or accelerates or breaks too hard, the green lights disappear and are replaced by red lights, or even flashing red lights. Initial operating tests produced promising results, with fuel consumption savings of 4% and suggest a potential gain of 7% with individual training to drivers.


1

This indicator measures the performance of public transportation, per passenger, compared to private cars in terms of avoiding C02 emissions, reducing vehicle density and lowering accident risk.



66



Back to Contents


Developing a mobile-phone ticketing service for the Nice Côte d’Azur Agglomeration (CANCA)

The experts all agree that in order to reduce the use of private vehicles and thereby transport-related greenhouse gas emissions, it is essential to encourage the development of public transportation. However, public transportation is sometimes considered complicated to use and unreliable. To win over those who remain reticent, decrease traffic and reduce travel time, Veolia Environnement experts have been considering a new system based on mobile-phone technology.

Today, 80% of French people own a mobile phone. In the near future, these phones will have a NFC (Near Field Communication) interface, enabling “touch” communication. This NFC interface enables the exchange of ideasdata with manufactures.a terminal located a few centimeters away. Using this NFC technology, Veolia Environnement developed a unified and user-friendly ticketing service, which turns the mobile phone into a passenger information service, a payment means and a transport ticket. This mobile-phone ticketing service is operational and ready to be launched in the greater Nice Côte d’Azur area.

Bioenergy: making waste an energy resourceStrengthening expertise in biodiversity with the launch of the “Mathematical Biodiversity Modeling” Chair

We are fully committed to programs to preserve biodiversity, particularly in regions where we operate, and therefore we wished to strengthen our expertise by joining forces with the prestigious French engineering school,Ecole Polytechnique, the French National Museum of Natural History and theÉcole PolytechniqueFoundation, to create the international “Mathematical Biodiversity Modeling” teaching and research chair.

The usechair was created on June 17, 2009 by a public-private partnership in which the Museum andEcole Polytechniquewill supply outstanding teams of waste (solidresearchers and liquid)teachers, Veolia Environnement will contribute funding and technical expertise. TheEcole Polytechnique Foundation will provide its experience in industrial relations and assistance in project management. Working from an international perspective, the aim of the chair is to develop a synergy between applied mathematics, ecology, biodiversity and evolution in both research and teaching. Ultimately, the goal is to put in place and support an innovative, topical project with a strong scientific, social and economic impact. Taking a multidisciplinary approach to modeling ecosystems, such a project will address key environmental issues, such as an energy resource represents a concrete solution in conserving fossil fuelsadaptive evolution, spatial colonization and promoting renewable energy sources while minimizing environmentalecological niches, as we ll as analyze the dynamics of communities and sanitation risks.build biodiversity scenarios.


For this approach, suitable new mathematical tools will have to be created. One of our fixed R&Dthe main objectives is to develop evaluatenew probability models of evolution along with the relevant statistical tools to better take into account the interactions and confirmdiversity of the viabilityscales of bioenergy sources suchthe different ecosystems, maing it possible to predict their dynamics. The impact of spatial or temporal variability in the environment on the growth and survival of a population will be studied, and random models for species abundance and displacement will be developed. Collaboration between the National Natural History Museum and Veolia Environnement will enable these models to be compared with field expertise and data, as well as with more operational situations.

Development of an automated sorting system

Sorting is a strategic stage in waste management, particularly for recycling. Recycling reduces the quantity of final waste and any potential pollution. In addition to reducing the use of new raw materials, recycling generally enables energy and water savings in industrial processes and a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. Using increasingly complex technologies, R&I activities focus on automating sorting centers, whether for waste presorted by households or bulk non-hazardous industrial waste. By improving the quality of sorting activities, automation increases material recycling opportunities.

In 2007, Veolia Propreté developed and patented an innovative procedure, the Self-Adapting Sequential Sorting process (Tri Séquentiel Auto Adaptif, TSA). Thanks primarily to an algorithm which guides the sorting machine based on the waste flow composition, this process enables several categories of objects to be sorted by a single sorting machine. After the feasibility of this system had been demonstrated, industrial pilot studies were launched in April 2008. Following validation in 2009, the TSA 2 system can now be rolled-out and twenty installations are already planned by 2011. The TSA 2 system makes multi-task sorting machines feasible and particularly facilitates more efficient, detailed and extensive sorting of plastic materials. The process therefore enables the recovery of more used materials and increases the efficiency of sorting centers by close to 10%. Ov erall, TSA 2 therefore enables a reduction in recycling costs, which is fundamental to developing new competitive recovery outlets.

Employee and human aspects are also fully integrated into the research approach. The automation of sorting activities is a major research area for improving the work, health and safety conditions of sorting employees. Furthermore, the optimization of sorting activities will, in the long-term, open up new job opportunities in the recycling sector, with the appearance of new recovery markets.



67



Back to Contents


Waste-to-energy biomethane production

With strong demographic growth and the concentration of populations in urban areas, waste recycling is an environmental priority which Veolia Environnement Group has decided to tackle. Currently, with the increase in energy needs and the decrease in fossil fuels, Veolia Propreté is searching for solutions to replace fossils with new fuels produced from waste, thereby contributing to reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

In an energy production context, performance optimization and the diversification of biogas emitted from storage centers, sediment from wastewater treatment plants, biofuel… Thanksrecovery methods at non-hazardous waste landfill sites, form part of the research programs we have undertaken. In 2009, Veolia Propreté Ile-de-France successfully brought the first French biomethane fuel production plant online, using biogas produced at the non-hazardous waste landfill site in Claye-Souilly (Seine et Marne). Eight light vehicles and a household refuse collection truck, fitted with NGV (Natural Gas Vehicle) engines, now fuel up on Méth’OD® (100% methane of waste origin) directly at Veolia Propreté’s Claye-Souilly site.

This new waste-to-energy process for biogas produced at non-hazardous waste landfill sites complements the existing waste-to-energy installations at the Claye-Souilly site, which produce electricity equivalent to research carried out on food oil waste, SARP Industrie (a subsidiarythe electricity consumption (excluding heating) of Veolia) has implemented a biodiesel projecttown with a production unitpopulation of approximately 50,000 t/year.228,000.

The development opportunities for this research program are substantial, given the quantity of methane produced by our installations operated around the world. This project enables the direct recovery of biogas, either as fuel for use by vehicles offloading their waste, or by Veolia Transport bus fleets, or as biomethane for reinjection into the natural gas transportation and distribution network.

Improving living conditions and the quality of indoor air

Improving the health and living conditions of populations is one of the major challenges underpinning Veolia Environnement R&I activities. According to the World Health Organization, 30% of diseases are due to air and water pollution.

With the concentration of populations and activities in urban areas, our research teams are focusing increasingly on the problems associated with the quality of inside air. Numerous pollutants exist in the air inside residential accommodation, where the air is often more polluted than outside.

In 2009, R&I activities produced, in particular, more reliable tools to measure air quality. The Limay research center developed a special-purpose metering system (measurement model) which pushed forward advances achieved in 2008 by optimizing and validating the “Inside Air Quality” pilot study. Researchers thereby improved their ability to measure the efficiency of certain air treatment filters.



68



Back to contentsContents



ITEM 4A.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not Applicable.




69



Back to contentsContents



ITEM 5.

OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

The following discussion of our operations should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewherebelow in this report. Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and with IFRS as adopted by the European Union.

Concession contracts are accounted for in the 2006 consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRIC Interpretation 12,Service Concession Arrangements (IFRIC 12), published in November 2006. This interpretation, which is pending adoption by the European Union following a favorable vote of the EFRAG in March 2007, is applicable to accounting periods commencing on or after January 1, 2008. We have elected early adoption of this interpretation, and the change in accounting method has been applied retrospectively.  As such, our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005, and 2004 have been adjusted accordingly for the retrospective adoption of IFRIC 12.

Unless otherwise indicated, the following discussion relates to our IFRS financial information as adjusted for the retrospective adoption of IFRIC 12.

IFRS differ in certain significant respects from U.S. GAAP. Note 51 to our consolidated financial statements provides a description of the principal differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP for 2004, 2005 and 2006, as they relate to our company, and reconciles our shareholders’ equity and net income to U.S. GAAP as of and for each of the years ended, December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006.

The following discussion also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those described under “Item 3. Key Information–Risk Factors.” Our results may differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements. See “Forward-Looking Statements” at the beginning of this document for a more detailed discussion of the risks and uncertainties to which our results and financial condition are subject.

OVERVIEW

Major Developments in 20062009

A strong business modelOverview

Our strategyAs was the case in the second half of developing environmental services through long-term contracts produced led2008, 2009 was marked by the financial crisis and its economic repercussions, and specifically:

significant exchange rate fluctuations, which modified the contribution of businesses from outside the Euro zone, particularly in Eastern Europe and in countries that use the U.S. dollar (or currencies tied to significantthe U.S. dollar);

the volatility in energy prices and the decrease in both the volume and market price of CO2 emission rights;

the fall, followed by the stagnation or rise, in the price of certain recycled raw materials (particularly paper and cardboard);

the slowdown in activity, affecting volumes in the Environmental Services business lines, and, to a lesser extent, new construction orders in the Water and Energy Services Division;

the difficult financial situation of industrial companies and, to a lesser extent, public entities, which affected the performance of certain growth projects and the solvency of some customers.

The first signs of stabilization of the economic environment began to appear, nonetheless, during the second half of 2009.

This difficult economic climate affected our Environmental Services business units in particular and, to a lesser extent, the businesses of the other Divisions, in terms of the construction activities and sales of solutions to an increase inindustrial customers.

Overall, revenue of 11.9% in 2006for the year ended December 31, 2009 fell 3.4% compared to 2005.  This growth was accompaniedthe year ended December 31, 2008 (-2.7% at constant scope of consolidation and exchange rates). Adjusted operating cash flow (a non-GAAP measure that we use to assess performance, as discussed in more detail below) declined by continued improvements3.6% from 2008 to 2009, primarily in profitability.the Environmental Services Division (down 10.3%), despite the implementation of a cost-cutting plan. Adjusted operating income increased(another non-GAAP measure that we discuss below) declined by 16.7%15.1%, or 12.4% at constant exchange rates, again reflecting primarily a decline in 2006 compared to 2005, and adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent increased by more than 20% over the same period.  Total operatingEnvironmental Services Division. Operating income increased by 12.7% in 2006 compared to 2005, and total net income attributable to equity holders of the parent increased by 21.9%.  

Adjusted3.0%, or 6.1% at constant exchange rates, primarily because substantial goodwill impairment charges (which do not affect adjusted operating income andcash flow or adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent are non-GAAP measures used by management to evaluate the performance of our business.  These terms are defined and reconciled to the nearest IFRS measures under “—Presentation of Information in this Section -- Non-GAAP measures” below and the sections referred to therein.

These performances are the result of our decision to grow our business in Europe, Asia and North America for each line of business, and of our ability to generate savings and synergies and to renew contracts.

Increase in synergies between businesses

Our strategic choices have resultedOperating Income) were recorded in the acquisition of new Water and Energy contracts, targeted acquisitions aimed at strengthening positions (Environmental ServicesEnvironmental S ervices Division in Great Britain and Belgium) and the development of new business activities, directly linked to our expertise, such as the acquisition of an interest in SNCM and the signing of a framework agreement with CMA CGM in combined rail transport.2008.

Our ability to generate savings and synergies has resulted in €104 million in new net annual savings in 2006  within the Veolia 2005 efficiency plan.  In total, the efficiency plan generated €406 million in annual savings.  Based on their nature, we expect these savings to continue in the future.  These savings and synergies were completed through programs designed to strengthen our organization.

Forward-looking choices

We believe that our forward-looking choices in terms of training, research and development, give us a strong base for long-term profitable growth.  Thus, in 2006 we decided to accelerate our training programs by deciding to create regional campus in France. We strengthened our research projects through the optimization and the management of resources.



70



Back to contentsContents



Commercial success within growth marketsOverview

We won several importantmajor contracts during 2006:in 2009:

·

AtOn January 21, 2009, Veolia Transport and RATP Développement formed a 50/50 joint venture to boost growth potential in Asia, primarily targeting China, South Korea and India. The joint venture was formed for an initial period of 20 years and will generate estimated annual revenue of approximately €100 million (full-year basis), with a business objective of €500 million of annual revenue in 2013.

On March 26, 2009, the beginningconsortium comprising Veolia Transport and its Moroccan partners won a 15-year contract to operate the collective transportation service for the Greater Rabat region, made up of 14 communes. This contract commenced in August 2009. The contract represents estimated total revenue of approximately €1,096 million.

On April 21, 2009, Veolia Eau announced that Canal Isabel II, the public company in charge of water services in the Madrid area, awarded a contract for the management of Spain’s biggest wastewater treatment plant (in terms of daily flows treated) to a consortium headed by Veolia Eau. This 4-year contract, which has a 2-year extension clause, covers the operation and maintenance of the year,main treatment plant for Madrid. The contract represents estimated total revenue of approximately €16 million for Veolia Eau won.

On May 19, 2009, Veolia Environmental Services announced the win by its subsidiary, Veolia Environmental Services (UK), of a 20-year waste management and recycling contract, for water services grantedfollowing a public tender launched by the Prostejov water company,Merseyside Waste Disposal Authority (MWDA). MWDA is a public body representing five Merseyside district councils located in the north-west of England and including the city of Liverpool. The contract, which commenced in June 2009, includes the development of a flagship materials recovery facility (MRF) at Gilmoss, Liverpool, with an annual capacity of 100,000 metric tons and a refurbishment program for existing infrastructure including improvements to the efficiency and yield of the Bidston MRF and the renovation and management of a network of 16 household waste recycling centers. The contract represents estimated total revenue of approximately £640 million (€72 0 million).

��

On May 28, 2009, Veolia Eau announced the signature with the public waterworks authority of the Moravia Region incity of Doha, the Czech Republic. This iscapital of Qatar, of a 25-year7-year contract representing total cumulative revenues(with a 3-year extension clause) for the periodoperation and maintenance of €139two wastewater treatment plants with respective daily waste capacity of 112,000 m3 and 12,000 m3respectively. Once recycled, the wastewater will be reused for irrigation and agricultural purposes. This contract represents estimated total revenue of approximately €44 million.

·

AtOn June 23, 2009, Veolia Eau announced the award by the Joint District Authority of the city of Chartres in France of a contract to build and operate the city’s new wastewater treatment plant. When the plant comes into service (34 months after the launch of studies), it will have a treatment capacity of 164,000 population equivalent, which may be extended to a 200,000 population equivalent by the end of January, Veolia Eau signed an important partnership agreement with a subsidiarythe contract. The design and construction of Sinopec, the largest Chinese refining group. Through this 25-year contract the two entities created a joint venture, whichplant will be managedcontracted-out by Veolia Eau to ensurea consortium made up of OTV/Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies (a subsidiary of Veolia Eau and the operation collectionlead company) and Ternois. This contract represents estimated total revenue of €156 million, including €54 million for construction activities and €102 million for the 20-year concession contract.

In July 2009, Veolia Transport was informed of the decision not to renew the Melbourne contract (train network). This contract represented annual revenue of approximately €410 million.

On July 7, 2009, the Group announced the signature by Veolia Transport of a 10-year contract (initial term of 5 years, with renewal for a further 5 years based upon performance goals) with the New Orleans Regional Transit Authority (RTA). Veolia Transportation, the U.S. subsidiary of Veolia Transport, will be responsible for all aspects of public transportation in New Orleans under a delegated management contract, including operations, safety, maintenance, customer care, routes and schedules, capital planning and grant administration. The contract represents estimated total revenue of approximately €202 million for Veolia.

On September 15, 2009, Veolia Eau announced that the Brazilian oil company Petrobras had awarded its subsidiary Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies, under a 50/50 joint venture with Enfil, a Brazilian water treatment engineering company, a contract for the design and construction of a water treatment and recycling plant at the Abreu e Lima Refinery, in Ipojuca, Pernambuco State, Brazil. This contract represents estimated total revenues for Veolia Eau of industrial wastewater from€123 million.



71



Back to Contents


On September 24, 2009, Veolia Transport announced it had won the Yanshan site (inbus operating contract for the suburbsVästra Götaland Region, west of Beijing).Göteborg, Sweden. This 8-year contract will commence in June 2010 and represents annual revenues estimated at approximately €30 million.

On October 7, 2009, Veolia Transport announced it had won the public service delegation and transport contract for Mont Saint Michel in France. The joint ventureauthority with responsibility for the Bay of Mont Saint Michel selected Veolia Transport to operate public services to welcome and transport visitors to the site. The contract is for 13 years, three of which will be spent on the construction of the off-site parking lots and the operations center. It will generate estimated total cumulative revenue of approximately €249€91 million.

·

On February 9, 2006, Veolia Eau wonIn October 2009, Dalkia announced the signature of a contract with the Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital in Udine, Italy for the management contract forof a wastewater facility in the Ajman Emirates (United Arab Emirates).heating network, integrated facilities management and thermal and multi-technical services. This 27-year contract represents total cumulative revenue of approximately €151 million.

·

On March 16 and 29, 2006, Veolia Transport won two urban and para-transit transport contracts in the United States. The first contract relates to Orange County in California and came into effect July 1, 2006. This three-year30-year contract represents estimated total revenue of €394 million.

On November 9, 2009, the Group announced the signature of a partnership between Dalkia and CEZ, the number-one electricity producer in the Czech Republic, to develop industrial cooperation that could potentially lead to asset transfers. As a first step, the Group will transfer 15% of Dalkia Czech Republic to CEZ for consideration of €93 million (Group share), subject to obtaining the necessary competition authorizations. This transaction has not yet been completed as of the date of this document.

On November 30, 2009, the Group announced that Veolia Environmental Services, via its subsidiary Ecospace Limited, had renewed the operating and maintenance contract for the hazardous waste treatment plant in Hong Kong for a period of 10 years commencing December 1, 2009. This contract strengthened Veolia Environmental Services’ position as a major player in the waste management and recovery market serving the Hong Kong community. It is expected to generate cumulative revenue of approximately €73€174 million. The second

In December 2009, Dalkia announced the signature of a contract relates towith Tersa Tractament y Seleccio de Residus SA in Spain for the citymanagement of Mesaa heating and cooling network in Arizona.the Marina district of Barcelona. This is a six-year30-year contract representingrepresents estimated total cumulative revenue of €123€492 million.

·

On April 12, 2006, following an internationalThe public service delegation contract between SEDIF (Great Paris Water Authority) and Veolia Eau in France expires at the end of 2010. A call for tenders is in progress for the renewal of this contract, which currently represents annual revenue of approximately €360 million. SEDIF announced on January 22, 2010 that it had short-listed Veolia Eau won a constructionand Suez Environnement as candidates for the renewal of this contract. A final decision is expected from SEDIF in June 2010 and the future contract will take effect on January 1, 2011.

Acquisitions Disposals and Partnerships

No major acquisitions were completed during 2009.

As part of its divestiture program, the Group made the following divestitures in 2009:

On June 24, 2009, Veolia Environmental Services announced that it had entered into exclusive discussions with TFN Group with respect to the sale of Veolia Propreté Nettoyage et Multiservices (VPNM). The sale was completed on August, 26, 2009 for a new seawater desalination plantan enterprise value of €111 million.

On July 6, 2009, Veolia Environmental Services announced the signature of an agreement relating to the sale of its U.S. incineration business (Montenay International); the partial sale of activities provided for in Bahrainthe agreement was completed in August 2009 for an enterprise value of €220 million.

On August 12, 2009, Dalkia announced the signature of an agreement for the sale of its Facilities Management activities in the United Kingdom for a total amount of approximately €255 million. Operations will start between April 2007 and November 2007 for the first two units.

·

In May 2006, Veolia Eau successively won the first two international calls for tenders by the Slovak authorities, both 30-year contracts. The first contract relates to the central region of Slovakia and represents estimated total cumulative revenue for the period of €1.4 billion; the second contract relates to the Poprad region in northern Slovakia and represents estimated total cumulative revenues for the period of €566 million.

·

On June 29, 2006, Veolia Energie won two public-private partnership contracts in Italy for the construction and the management of hospitals. The contracts are for 17 and 30 years respectively, with estimated total cumulative operating and maintenance revenues of €211 million.

·

In July 2006, Veolia Transport won a management contract for public transport in the Limbourg region, in southeast Holland. This 10-year contract, effective€90 million (Group share) as of December 16, 2006, represents total cumulative revenues31, 2009.

On December 1, 2009, Veolia Environnement announced that its subsidiary Veolia Transport had completed the sale of approximately €1.1 billion.Veolia Cargo to Transport Ferroviaire Holding (SNCF Group) and Europorte (Eurotunnel Group). Europorte purchased Veolia Cargo’s activities in France, while Transport Ferroviaire Holding purchased Veolia Cargo’s activities in Germany, the Netherlands and Italy. The divestiture of Veolia Cargo was completed in December 2009 for an enterprise value of €94 million.

·

72



Back to Contents


On December 22, 2009, Veolia Eau reviewed certain economic aspects (financial restructuring) and the governance rules of its partnership with Mubadala Development Company in our operating activities in North Africa and the Middle East. The joint venture, which was formerly fully consolidated, is now under proportionate consolidation due to these changes. This operation resulted in a €189 million reduction in Group debt as of December 31, 2009;

In early September 2006,the fourth quarter of 2009, the Group finalized the sale of a minority interest in Compagnie Méridionale de Navigation for €45 million, representing the entire remaining interest held by the Group.

Finally, in December 2009, the EBRD acquired an additional 6.88% interest in Veolia Eau strengthenedVoda (through a reserved share capital increase), the entity that conducts all of the Group’s Water Division operating activities in Central Europe, for €70 million. This brings the total interest of the EBRD in Veolia Voda to 16.88%.

Overall, industrial and financial divestitures (on an enterprise value basis), including share capital increases subscribed by non-controlling interests, totaled €1,291 million in fiscal year 2009.

The Group has decided to sell its positionactivities in Asia by winning a new 30-year contracttransportation in China for the managementUnited Kingdom and its Renewable Energies business in the Energy Services Division during the course of water services2010. These activities correspond to cash-generating units and have been therefore reclassified in Liuzhou. This contract represents estimated total cumulative revenues of more than €330 million.

·

Atdiscontinued operations in the beginningGroup financial statements as of December 2006,31, 2009.

On July 23, 2009 and as announced in August 2009, the Group and the Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations decided to enter into exclusive negotiations with a view to combining Transdev, a leading French transport operator, and Veolia Eau was selected forTransport. The operation would take the form of a combination between Veolia Transport and Transdev, with the Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations and Veolia Environnement each owning 50% after analysis and valuation of the two major projects in Australia. Forcompanies, and subsequent adjustment of the firstfinancial structure. The planned combination is subject to reaching a definitive agreement, which is itself subject to approval by the regulatory authorities. This industrial project Veolia Eau will act as consultant to the State of Queensland for the development of all installations and infrastructure, and will then operate these installations. This project, whose completion is anticipated for the end of 2008, representsto give rise to a global investment of €1leader in public passenger transport, with around €8 billion for the State of Queensland. The second project relates to the design, constructionin combined revenues and management of a desalination by reverse osmosis plant. The plant will be operational as of the end of 2008.

·130,000 employees.

In December 2006, Veolia Energie won a public service management contract for district heating for Cergy-Pontoise2009, Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations and its suburbs. This 16-year contract represents total cumulative revenues of €268.7 million.

We also reinforced our position as market leader through targeted acquisitions, generating strength and cost synergies:

·

On January 2, 2006, Veolia Transport carried out the acquisition of Shuttleport, an airport shuttle service, in the United States of America for €28.1 million;

·

In May 2006, Veolia Propreté purchased Biffa Belgium, fourth in the Belgian waste market, for an amount of €62.4 million, reinforcing its development base in Northern Europe and the Benelux countries. Estimated annual sales figures are €85.5 million.




Back to contents




·

On September 28, 2006, the most important of these transactions was realized with the acquisition of Cleanaway Holding Limited by Veolia Propreté for a price of €745 million. This company operates in Great Britain in the area of municipal and industrial waste collection services and integrated service of waste management. Annual sales figures are estimated at €684 million.

·

On October 19, 2006, Veolia Transport acquired SuperShuttle in the United States (customized transportation for American airports), for €72 million. SuperShuttle’s annual revenues are estimated at €55.2 million.

Development strategy focused on new businesses linked to our commercial expertise

We pursued our development strategy within new businesses linked directly to our expertise:

·

On May 31, 2006, Veolia Environnement Butler Capital Partners and CGMF signed agreements relatingreached a framework agreement for the combination, which primarily covers the financial structure of the new group, with a view to the Société Nationale Maritime Corse Méditerranée (SNCM).  These agreements were partsignature of a transaction to open SNCM’s capital to outside investment, a decision made by the French government at the beginningfinal agreement in 2010. The proposed combination of 2005, and the restructuring of the company.  The transaction is still subject to a cancellation clause relating to the European Commission’s agreement on state aid.  Veolia Environnement holds 28.29% of the SNCM’s share capital. As a result of this acquisition, Veolia Transport has significantly strengthened its position as a ship line operator, which has been set up for a few years in northern Europe, in markets with strong growth. This deal represents an investment of €72.2 million.

·

On September 11, 2006, Veolia Transport and Rail Link, a subsidiaryTransdev would be carried out by way of CMA CGM, the third largest freight carrier worldwide, joined togethercontribution of Veolia Transport and Transdev to develop a new European rail transport and sea freight container company.  This partnership creates two new distinct companies:  a combined transport operator with a mission to organize and market the transport of freight containers between the harbor andentity, held 50% by Veolia Environnement, acting as the industrial siteoperator so as to retain transportation as a key component of its environmental services, and 50% by Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations, acting as a long-term strategic shareholder. In order to contribute to the buy out of the final client, andRATP 25.6% shareholding in Transdev, the Group would divest certain Transport activities outside of France, as well as a railway company that combines industrial means and ensures rail transportlimited number of the freight containers.  These two companies will be operational by the end of 2006, with anticipated cumulative revenues for 2010 of approximately €100 million for combined transport operations and approximately €50 million for the railway company.

·

At the end of November 2006, the Total and Veolia Environnement groups joined together to construct and operate an oil recycling plantTransport Division contracts in France through their joint subsidiary Osilub. This project isas part of the sustainable development programs for both companies and contributes tocombination with Transdev, in line with the optimization of the life of industrial products and preserves non-renewable natural resources.

·

In 2006, Dalkia opened a biomass centerproject announced in the Lithuanian capital through which Vilniaus Energija reduces its dependence on fossil energy and encourages local development. The Vilniaus Enegija networks boiler is the largest biomass installation built by Dalkia.  August 2009.

The thorough review of assets continued in 2006

During the 2006 fiscal year we carried out a review of our assets and proceeded with several total or partial sales, without affecting our operating capacities:

·

During the first quarter of 2006, the Energy Services division disposed of 34% of the company that holds the Lodz contract to the IFM (Industry Funds Management) for a price of €70.0 million.

·

On April 10, 2006, Veolia Environnement disposed of its interest in Southern Water to Southern Water Capital Limited, the major shareholder of Southern Water. The total amount of the transaction was €89.6 million net of the exercise of the put option.

·

On June 1, 2006, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) took a 35% interest in Veolia Transport Central Europe GmbH, which groups together the activities of Veolia Transport in Central and Eastern Europe, for an amount of €59.8 million.

A thorough review of assets has also led us to take measures to ensure better efficiency:

·

We decided to dispose of the Transportation Division’s Danish business, which will occur occurred in 2007, and recorded an impairment charge in respect of assets for an amount of €44 million.

·

Difficulties encountered with a contract in Germany within the Transportation business resulted in asset impairments and provisions of €86 million.




Back to contents



Presentation of Information in this Section

Definition of “organic”“internal growth” and “external” growth“external growth”

As used in this report, theThe term “organicinternal growth” includes (or “growth at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates”) encompasses growth resulting from new contracts won, the expansion of an existing contractual arrangements through increasescontract, notably resulting from an increase in prices and/or volumes delivereddistributed or processed, as well as new contracts, and the acquisition of operating assets attributed to a particular contract or project.

The term “external growth” relates toexternal growth resulting from” encompasses growth through acquisitions (net(completed in the current period, or which had an effect on revenues for only part of divestitures)the prior period), net of divestitures, of entities that hold multiple contracts and/or assets useddeployed in different markets and/or containing a portfolio of more than one or more markets.

Discontinued Operationscontract.

In accordance with IFRS 5, we record income and loss from our discontinued operations on a separate line in our consolidated income statement.   “Net income (loss) on discontinued operations” is the total of income and expenses, net of tax, related

73



Back to lines of businesses sold or in the process of being sold. It is the income or expense generated over the period by the assets and liabilities included in the specific, balance-sheet line items “Non-current assets held for sale” and “Non-current liabilities held for sale.”Contents


Non-GAAP Measures

We use a number of non-GAAP financial measures to manage our business and to supplement ourthe financial information presented in accordance with IFRS. Non-GAAP financial measures are defined as numerical measures of performance, position or cash flows that (i) exclude amounts that arewould ordinarily be included in the nearestmost directly comparable IFRS measures,measure or (ii) include amounts that are not inwould ordinarily be excluded from the nearestmost directly comparable IFRS measures.measure. We discuss below the non-GAAP financial measures that we use in multiple places in this Section, the reasons why we believe they provide useful information and the location in this Section where they are reconciled to the nearestmost comparable IFRS measures. We provide similar information for non-GAAP measures that we use only once in the Sections where those terms are used. You should not place undue reliance on non-GAAP financial measuresmeasu res or regard them as a substitute for the nearestmost comparable IFRS measures. Further,Furthermore, these non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.companies, and are not meant to be predictive of future trends in results of operations, financial condition or cash flow.

The non-GAAP financial measures that we use in this Sectionsection include the following:

Adjusted operating cash flow” (known in French ascapacité d’autofinancement opérationnelle) is an indicator that we use as a performance measure, which reflects the extent to which our operations produce cash. We believe this indicator is important for measuring our operating performance, because it eliminates non-cash charges such as depreciation, amortization and asset impairment, which can vary between similar operations based on the type of contractual relationship that we have with our customers. Adjusted operating cash flow is equal to operating income, adjusted to add or subtract (as applicable) depreciation, amortization and operational provisions expenses, impairment charges, replacement costs for concession assets (which are treated as investments in our consolidated cash flow statement), net gains on divestitures and other non-cash items (primarily IFRS 2 share-based compensation charges and fair value adjustments in respect of derivatives).

We use adjusted operating cash flow as a tool to manage our business, for purposes of evaluating our performance and for allocating resources internally, and as one of the following:elements that we use to determine variable compensation of our senior executives. Adjusted operating cash flow is reconciled to operating income for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, and 2009 under “—Results of Operations – Year ended December 31, 2009 compared to Year ended December 31, 2008” and “—Results of Operations – Year ended December 31, 2008 compared to Year ended December 31, 2007.”

Adjusted operating income” and “adjustedAdjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent” are equal to operating income and net income attributable to equity holders of the parent, respectively, adjusted to exclude the impact of goodwill impairment charges and certain items that are “non-recurring.” An item is “non-recurring” if it is unlikely to recur during each period and if it substantially changes the economics of one or more cash-generating units. We do not classify an item as “non-recurring” if the nature of the relevant charge or gain is such that it is reasonably likely to recur within two years, or there was a similar charge or gain within the prior two years. We believe that adjusted operating income and adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent are useful measurement tools becausebec ause they show t hethe results of our operations without regard to:excluding the impact of:

·

goodwill impairment charges, which we record when we determine that the value of a cash generating unit is less than its carrying value (as discussed under “—Critical Accounting Policies – Asset Impairment”), and which are differentdiffer from ourthe other items of revenuesrevenue and expensesexpense items used to determine operating income as they depend on management’s assessment of the future potential of a cash generating unit, rather than its results of operations in the period in question, and

·

non-recurring items,w hich” which by their nature are unlikely to be indicative of future trends in our results of operations.


In addition, weWe use adjusted operating income as a tool to manage our business, for purposes of evaluating our performance and for allocating resources internallyinternally. Adjusted operating income and as one factor in determining the variable compensation of our senior executives.  See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees – Compensation.” “Adjusted operating income” and “AdjustedAdjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent”parent are reconciled to operating income and net income attributable to equity holders of the parent, in each case for the years ended December 31, 20052007, 2008, and 2006,2009 under “—Results of Operations – Year ended December 31, 20062009 compared to Year ended December 31, 2005.”  

 “Net financial debt,” which represents gross financial debt (long-term borrowings, short-term borrowings, bank overdrafts), net2008” and “—Results of cash and cash equivalents and excluding revaluation of hedging instruments.  We use net financial debt as an indicatorOperations – Year ended December 31, 2008 compared to monitor our overall liquidity position, and as one factor in determining the variable compensation of our senior executives.  Our net financial debt is reconciled to our gross financial debt in “—Liquidity and Capital Resources – Sources of Funds – Financings.Year ended December 31, 2007.

ROCE” or “Return on Capital EmployedConstant Exchange Rates” is a measurement toolterm that we use to managerefer to growth in our revenues, adjusted operating cash flow and operating income, excluding the profitabilityimpact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. We calculate constant exchange rate figures by applying to current year figures the exchange rate from the preceding year. When we present percentage growth (or decline) on a constant exchange rate basis, we also present the corresponding figure on a current exchange rate basis.



74



Back to Contents


Accounting for concessions and other items

General

Concession agreements are accounted for in accordance with IFRIC 12, Service Concession Arrangements, published in November 2006. This interpretation, which was approved by the European Union on March 26, 2009, is applicable to periods beginning on or after January 1, 2008. In fiscal year 2006, Veolia Environnement elected to adopt IFRIC 12 early, and this change in accounting method was applied retrospectively in accordance with IAS 8 on changes in accounting method.

The application of IFRIC 12 is complex and is described in detail in Note 1.21 to our consolidated financial statements. As a general matter, a contract is considered a concession agreement under IFRIC 12 if a public sector customer (the “grantor”) controls or regulates the services that we must provide with the infrastructure that we use, to whom the services must be provided and at what price, and if the grantor controls a significant residual interest in the infrastructure. Pursuant to IFRIC 12, the infrastructure used in a concession is not considered to be part of our property, plant and equipment, but instead we recognize financial assets or intangible assets (depending on the nature of our payment rights) in respect of the concession contracts.

Change in Presentation of Replacement Costs as of January 1, 2010

Beginning on January 1, 2010, the Group’s presentation of replacement costs relating to concession assets in the context of public service delegation contracts globallyin France will be changed, pursuant to an amendment to IAS 7.

Currently, all such replacement costs are considered in the consolidated cash flow statement as investments, regardless of whether the infrastructure was originally financed by the concession holder. As such, in the passage from “net income attributable to equity holders of the parent” to “net cash from operating activities,” replacement costs are eliminated under “Operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses.” See Note 19 to make investment decisions.  ROCE is the ratioConsolidated Financial Statements included in this document.

As a result of (i) our resultsthe change that will take effect on January 1, 2010, the Group will eliminate replacement costs from net cash from operating activities in the consolidated cash flow statement and reduce the amount of operations, netmaintenance-related investments presented in the consolidated cash flow statement. Consequently, when adjusting “Net income attributable to equity holders of tax,the parent” to obtain “Net cash from operating activities,” replacement costs will no longer be eliminated under “Operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and our share ofimpairment losses.” This amendment has no impact on net income of associates excluding revenue from operational financial assets, divided by (ii) the average amount of capital employed in our business during the same year.  Each of these terms is defined, and is reconciled to the nearest IFRS measure, under “—Liquidity and Capital Resources – Capital Expenditures – Return on Capital Employed (ROCE).”or equity.

Critical Accounting Policiesaccounting policies

We prepare our consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRS as publishedissued by the IASB and with IFRS as adopted by the European Union (with the exception of IFRIC 12, which we have chosen to adopt early pending its approval by the European Union).Union. Our consolidated financial statements are affected by the accounting policies used and the estimates, judgments and assumptions made by management during their preparation. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the periods presented.




Back to contents



The principal significant estimates and assumptions made by management during the preparation of our consolidated financial statements relate to the accounting policies used in connection with asset impairment, provisions, pension liabilities, asset impairment, deferred taxes and derivative financial instruments.

Asset Impairment

The net carrying amount of non-financial assets, other than inventory and deferred tax assets is reviewed at each period-end in order to assess the existence of any indication of loss in value. Where such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset (equal to the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use) is estimated and the net carrying amount of an asset or group of assets is reduced to its recoverable amount where this is lower. Impairment losses can be reversed, with the exception of those relating to goodwill.

Veolia Environnement performs systematic annual impairment tests on goodwill and other intangible assets with an indefinite useful life during our annual long-term planning review, or more frequently where there is an indication of loss in value. Where an exceptional impairment must be recorded, it is deducted in priority from goodwill allocated to the cash-generating unit (CGU) and then, where applicable, pro rata to the net carrying amounts of the other assets of the CGU.



75



Back to Contents


The value-in-use is determined by discounting the future cash flows expected to be derived from the asset, CGU or group of CGUs considered, taking into account, where appropriate, the residual value. Given the Group’s activities, the CGUs generally represent a country in each Division. Future cash flows are taken for the first six years from the long-term plan validated by Executive Management. The main assumptions included in the calculation of the value-in-use of each CGU are the discount rate, changes in activity volumes, prices and direct costs (inflation rate) and investments over the period:

A discount rate (weighted average cost of capital) is determined for each asset, CGU or group of CGUs: it is equal to the risk-free rate plus a risk premium weighted for country-specific risks. The discount rates estimated by management for each cash-generating unit therefore reflect current market assessments of the time value of money and the country specific risks to which the cash-generating unit is exposed, with the other risks reflected in the expected future cash flows from the assets.

Changes in volumes, prices and direct costs are based on past changes and expected future market trends.

The terminal value is calculated based on discounted forecast flows for the last year (2015). These flows include organic growth from factors such as inflation.

As Water activities in China follow a specific economic model, with extremely long contract terms (up to fifty years) and high investment flows during the initial contract years, fiscal year 2015 may not be considered a standard year. Therefore, exceptionally, the business plan was extended to 2024 for the “Water–China” CGU, in order to identify standard flows for the calculation of the terminal value. The growth rate to perpetuity set out in Note 4 of our consolidated financial statements applies from this year.

A 1% increase in the discount rate used would generate recoverable net present values for invested capital below the net carrying amounts for those assets in the balance sheets of certain CGUs. The resulting impairment charge would be approximately €291 million (including €129 million for the “Energy Services - United States” CGU, €62 million for the “Dalkia - Italy” CGU and €31 million for the “Environmental Services – Italy” CGU).

A 1% decrease in the perpetual growth rate used would generate recoverable net present values for invested capital below the net carrying amounts for those assets in the balance sheets of certain CGUs. The resulting impairment charge would be approximately €237 million (including €106 million for the “Energy Services - United States” CGU, €43 million for the “Dalkia - Italy” CGU and €24 million for the “Environmental Services – Italy” CGU).

Provisions

Pursuant to IAS 37,Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets, a provision is recorded when, at the year end, the Group has a current legal or implicit obligation to a third party as a result of a past event, and it is more probable than not that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and the amount of the obligation can be reliably estimated.

As part of its obligations under public services contracts, the Group generally assumes responsibility for the maintenance and repair of installations of the publicly-owned utility networks it manages. The resulting maintenance and repair costs are analyzed in accordance with IAS 37 on provisions and, where necessary, a provision for contractual commitments is recorded where there is outstanding work to be performed.

In the event of a restructuring, an obligation exists if, prior to the period end, the restructuring has been announced and a detailed plan produced or implementation has commenced. Future operating costs are not provided.

Veolia Environnement calculates provisions for restoration of waste storage facilities, recording accruals corresponding to the obligation to restore a site as waste is deposited, i.e. recording a non-current asset component and then discounting to obtain a present value. This asset is then amortized based on its depletion.

Provisions giving rise to an outflow after more than one year are discounted if the impact is material. Discount rates reflect current assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the liability. The unwinding of the discount is recorded in the Consolidated Income Statement in “Other financial income and expenses.”



76



Back to Contents


Pension Liabilities

We maintain several pension plans, and measure our obligations under these plans using a projected unit credit method, which requires us to estimate our employees turnover, expected futurethe probability of personnel remaining with us until retirement, foreseeable changes in employees’future compensation and the present value of our liability on the basis of the appropriate discount rate for each countrymonetary zone in which we maintain a pension plan. As a result, we record pension-related assets or liabilities in our accounts and we record the related net expenses over the estimated term of service of our employees.

In accordance with IFRS requirements, we use market yields of high quality corporate bonds with a maturity similar in duration to the pension liabilities to determine the discount rate at the balance sheet date when available. If no such market yields are available, then we use the yields on government bonds with a maturity similar in duration to the liabilities. We estimate future compensation based on inflation rates estimated using a combination of the spread between index linked and non-index linked bonds, current inflation rates, and published statements of central banks and economists with respect to inflation prospects. We use mortality tables published by national statistical agencies in our evaluations, reviewed periodically to ensure that the latest available tables are being used. The assumptions used to measure our pension liabilities as of December 31, 20062009 are described in Note 34-c30 to ourthe consolidated financial statements.

The Group benefit obligation is especially sensitive to the discount rate and inflation. As of December 31, 2006,2009, a 1% increase in the discount rate would have decreased our aggregate pensiondecrease the benefit obligation by €248€237 million and our current service costs by €8€10 million. A 1% decrease in the discount rate would have increasedincrease the benefit obligation by €300€284 million and the current service costs by €11€13 million.

As of December 31, 2006,Conversely, a 1% increase in the inflation rate would have increased our aggregate pensionincrease the benefit obligation by €310€231 million and our current service costs by €11€9 million. A 1% decrease in the inflation rate would have decreaseddecrease the benefit obligation by €251€201 million and the current service costs by €8€7 million.

Asset Impairment

We perform an annual review of our goodwill and other intangible assets during our long-term planning in mid-year, or more frequently when there is an indication of an impairment loss. If the long-term prospects of an activity appear durably downgraded, we estimate the value of the impairment based either on the fair value less selling costs of the assets related to this activity in cases where we decide to dispose of the activity, or on the higher of fair value less selling costs or value in use, in cases where we decide to retain the activity.  We then record a one-time write-off or write-down of the carrying value of our goodwill to bring it in line with our estimates.    

When we use fair value less selling costs, we estimate the fair value based on earnings multiples appearing in brokers’ reports or on published information regarding similar transactions.  Our estimate could be significantly different from the actual sales price that we could receive in connection with the disposal of the activity.  In addition, actual selling costs could be greater or less than our estimate.

When we use the discounted future cash flows method to estimate value in use, we estimate future cash flows of business units known as “cash generating units,” and we apply a discount rate to the estimated future cash flows.   A cash-generating unit is generally a business segment (i.e., water, waste, energy or transport) in a given country.  Our future cash flow estimates are based on the forecasts in our latest long-term plan, plus an appropriate growth rate applied after the period covered by the plan.   The discount rate is equal to the risk free rate plus a risk premium weighted for business-specific risks relating to each asset, cash-generating unit or group of cash-generating units.  

As of December 31, 2006, a 1% increase in the discount rate applied to each cash generating unit would have resulted in an increased goodwill impairment charge of approximately €240 million euros, and a 1% decrease in the perpetual growth rate applied to each cash generating unit with a perpetual growthexpected rate of at least 2%return assumption would have resulted in an increased goodwill impairmentgenerate additional income of €7.8 million.

Deferred Taxes

The income tax expense (credit) includes the current tax charge of approximately €55 million euros.   (credit) and the deferred tax charge (credit).

Deferred Taxes  

We recognize deferred tax assets forare recognized on deductible temporarytiming differences, tax loss carry-forwardscarry forwards and/or tax credit carry-forwards.  We recognize deferred tax liabilities for taxable temporary differences. We adjust our deferredcarry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in prevailing tax laws and rates onat the enactment date.year end. Deferred tax balances are not discounted.

A deferred tax asset is recognized to the extent that we arethe Group is likely to generate sufficient future taxable profits against which the asset can be offset. Deferred tax assets are impaired to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available.

Derivative Financial Instruments

We use variousThe recognition and measurement of financial assets and liabilities is governed by IAS 39, Financial instruments: recognition and measurement. Financial assets are classified as available-for-sale, held to maturity, assets at fair value through profit and loss, asset derivative instruments, loans and receivables and cash and cash equivalents. Financial liabilities include borrowings, other financing and bank overdrafts, liability derivative instruments and operating payables. These categories and their implications for our consolidated financial statements are described in Note 1.15 to manage our exposureconsolidated financial statements.

The determination of the proper classification of financial instruments requires management to interest rateexercise judgment, and foreign exchange risks resulting fromdepends in part on our operating,intention regarding a given financial and investment activities.instrument, which is subject to change. Certain transactions performed in accordance with our management policyfinancial instruments (particularly derivative instruments that do not satisfyqualify for hedge accounting criteria andaccounting) are recorded as trading instruments.

Derivative instruments are recognized in theour consolidated balance sheet at fair value. Other thanvalue, and the exceptions detailed below, changeschange in the fair value from one period to the next is recorded in our consolidated income statement as part of derivativefinancial income and expense. Certain other financial instruments are recorded through the income statement. The fair value of derivatives is estimated using standard valuation models which take into account active market data.




Back to contents



Derivative instruments may be classified as one of three types of hedging relationship: fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or net investment hedge in a foreign operation:

·

a fair value hedge is a hedge of exposure to changes in fair value of a recognized asset or liability, or an identified portion of such an asset or liability, that is attributable to a particular risk (in particular interest rate or foreign exchange risk), and could affect net income for the period;

·

a cash flow hedge is a hedge of exposure to variability in cash flows that is attributable to a particular risk associated with a recognized asset or liability or a highly probable forecast transaction (such as a planned purchase or sale) and could affect net income for the period;

·

a net investment hedge in a foreign operation hedges the exposure to foreign exchange risk of the net assets of a foreign operation including loans considered part of the investment (IAS 21).

An asset, liability, firm commitment, future cash-flow or net investment in a foreign operation qualifies for hedge accounting if:

·

the hedging relationship is precisely defined and documented at the inception date;

·

the effectiveness of the hedge is demonstrated at inception and by regular verification of the offsetting nature of movements in the market value of the hedging instrument and the hedged item. The ineffective portion of the hedge is systematically recognized in financial items.

The use of hedge accounting has the following consequences:

·

in the case of fair value hedges of existing assets and liabilities, the hedged portion of these items is measured at fair value inwith the balance sheet. The gain or loss on remeasurement is recognized in the income statement, where it is offset against matching gains or losses arising on the fair value remeasurement of the hedging financial instrument,change from one period to the extent it is effective;

·

in the case of cash flow hedges, the portion of the gain or loss on the fair value remeasurement of the hedging instrument that is determined to be an effective hedge is recognizednext recorded directly in equity, whilewith the gain or loss on the fair value remeasurement of the underlying item is not recognized in the balance sheet. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognized. Gains or losses recognized in equity arechange released to the income statement in the same periodupon sale or periods in which the assets acquired or liabilities impact the income statement;

·

in the case of net investment hedges, the effective portion of the gain or lossimpairment. Certain other instruments are carried on the hedgingbalance sheet at an amortized cost basis and subjected to impairment testing. Our determination regardi ng the classification of a financial instrument is recognized in translation reserves in equity, while the ineffective portion is recognized in the income statement. Gainscan have a material impact on our results of operations and losses recognized in translation reserves are releasedour consolidated shareholders equity.



77



Back to the income statement when the foreign operation is sold.

Accounting for concessionsContents

Concession agreements are accounted for in

Discontinued operations

In accordance with IFRIC12, “Service Concession Arrangements” published in November 2006.  This interpretation, which is pending adoption byIFRS 5,Non-Current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations, the European Union following a favorable vote by the EFRAG in March 2007 is applicable starting January 1, 2008.  We elected to adopt IFRIC12 early, and this new accounting method was treated retrospectively in accordance with IAS8 concerning changes in accounting principles.  As a result, our financial statements asresults of and for the year ended December 31, 2005 were also adjusted so asoperations has been re-presented to take into account retrospectively the adoptiondivestiture of IFRIC12.

The application of IFRIC 12 is complexClemessy and is described in detail in Note 1.20 to our consolidated financial statements.  As a general matter, a contract is considered a concession agreement under IFRIC 12 if a public sector customer (the “grantor”) controls or regulates the services that we must provide with the infrastructure that we use, to whom the services must be provided and at what price, and if the grantor controls a significant residual interestCrystal in the infrastructure.  Pursuant to IFRIC 12,Energy Services Division in December 2008, the infrastructure usedresults of which were recorded as results from discontinued operations in a concession is not considered to be part of our property, plant2008. The 2008 and equipment, but instead we recognize financial assets or intangible assets (depending on the nature of our payment rights) in respect of the concession contracts.  




Back to contents



U.S. GAAP Reconciliation

Our consolidated financial2007 income statements have been preparedre-presented to classify as income from discontinued operations the results of operations of the following activities that have been divested or are in accordance with IFRS, which differsthe process of being sold:

the freight activities and U.K. transportation activities for the Transportation Division;

the waste-to-energy incineration activities in certain respects from U.S. GAAP. the United States for the Environmental Services Division;

the renewable energy activities for the Energy Services Division.

The following table shows our net income (loss)assets and shareholders’ equity under IFRS (adjusted for IFRIC 12 for 2004liabilities were classified as assets and 2005,liabilities held-for-sale as of December 31, 2009:

transportation activities in Switzerland and the United Kingdom,

Veolia Environmental Services in Ireland and incineration activities in the caseUnited States in the Environmental Services Division,

assets held jointly with Suez Environnement in France in the Water Division (as described below),

renewable energy activities in the Energy Services Division, and

all cogeneration activities in the Czech Republic in the Energy Services Division

Pursuant to the reciprocal purchase and sales agreement signed on December 19, 2008 between Suez Environnement and Veolia Environnement, which was to come into effect in 2009, certain assets jointly held with Suez were also reclassified in the balance sheet in assets and liabilities held for sale as of the IFRS figures) and U.S. GAAP for the periods indicated:  

 

At and for the year ended

December 31,

 

————

————

————

(millions of euros)

2006

2005
(IFRS adjusted)

2004
(IFRS adjusted)

 

————

————

————

Net Income (Loss)

   

IFRS

758.7

622.2

389.8

U.S. GAAP

732.1

555.7

145.2

    

Shareholders’ Equity

   

IFRS

4,360.8

3,790.2

3,211.2

U.S. GAAP

3,177.8

2,832.9

2,255.5


The most significant items in reconciling our shareholders’ equity under IFRS and U.S. GAAP in 2006, as reflected in Note 51 to our consolidated financial statements, were:

·

goodwill recorded at market value in connection with the transfer of certain subsidiaries and affiliates to our group in 1999 by Vivendi, our former parent company. Under U.S. GAAP, assets relating to these transfers were recorded at Vivendi’s historical cost basis. In addition, under IFRS, goodwill has not been amortized since January 1, 2004, while under U.S. GAAP goodwill has not been amortized since January 1, 2002.  The net effect on goodwill amounted to (€979.6) million at December 31, 2006;

·

amortization2008. This agreement was still in effect as of tangible assets by component under IFRS, which has an effect of (€252.0 million);

·

provisions including contractual commitments and significant provisions for onerous contracts whose recognition criteria are different, the impact on shareholders’ equity amounted to € 187.1 million at December 31, 2006;

·

some contracts are recorded under IFRS in accordance with IFRIC4 "Determining whether an arrangement contains a lease" or IFRIC12 "Service Concession arrangements". Under U.S. GAAP, Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 01-08 “Determining whether an arrangement contains a lease” is applied2009 and the corresponding assets and liabilities therefore remained classified as held for contracts entered into or significantly modified after January 1, 2004. Under U.S. GAAP, IFRIC12 is not recognized. The impactsale as of year end. These transactions were completed on shareholders' equity amount to (€109.7) million at December 31, 2006 for IFRIC 4 and (€81.9) million; for IFRIC12;

·

difference in accounting for of pensions plans and share based compensation. The difference between IFRS and U.S. GAAP amounted to  (€37.5) million.

The most significant items in reconciling our net income (loss) under IFRS and U.S. GAAP in 2006, as reflected in Note 51 to our consolidated financial statements, were:

·

tangible asset components for (€45.1) million;

·

pension plans and stock options for (€34.1) million;

·

changes resulting from analysis under IFRIC 4 and EITF 1.08 of (€21.8) million;

·

income tax for €105.9 million.March 22, 2010.


For a more detailed discussion of the significant differences between IFRS and US GAAP as applied to our company, see Note 51 to our consolidated financial statements.



78



Back to contentsContents



RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Year ended December 31, 20062009 compared to year ended December 31, 2005

The following discussion compares our results of operations in 2006 with our adjusted results of operations (reflecting the retroactive application of IFRIC 12 accounting for concessions) in 2005.  In addition, following a decision taken in 2006 to dispose of the Danish business of the Transportation Division in 2007, the results of this business were classified as discontinued operations in accordance with IFRS5 addressing activities held for sale, and the accounts for 2005 were adjusted accordingly.  The disposal of Southern Water was also treated according to IFRS5, and the accounts for 2005 were adjusted accordingly.2008

Revenue

Overview

Our consolidated revenue for the year ending December 31, 2006 grew 11.9% to €28,620.4 million, compared to €25,570.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. Organic growth was 8.1%.

External growth of 3.8% was primarily the result of acquisitions made by Veolia Transport in France and the United States (a combined contribution of around €443 million) and Veolia Propreté in the United Kingdom (a contribution of around €215 million). Revenue from outside France stood at €15,217.4 million, or 53.2% of the total, compared with 51.3% in 2005.

The currency effect was neutral, with a weakening of the U.S. dollar (negative impact of €53.5 million) offset by a strengthening of the Czech koruna (positive impact of €44.7 million).

The following table shows a breakdown of our revenue:revenues in 2008 and 2009:

2006

(in € millions)

2005 adjusted

(in € millions)

% change 2006/2005

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

28,620.4

25,570.4

11.9%

8.1%

3.8%

-

Year ended
December 31, 2009
(€ million)

Year ended
December 31, 2008

(€ million)

% Change
2009/2008

Internal
growth

External
growth

Foreign
exchange
impact

34,551.0

35,764.8

-3.4%

-2.7%

0.2%

-0.9%


Group consolidated revenue totaled €34,551.0 million compared to €35,764.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing a fall of 3.4% compared to 2008 (-2.5% at constant exchange rates).

The fall in revenue at constant exchange rates was mainly due to:

a drop in volumes in the Environmental Services Division (volumes collected and placed in landfill sites), which accounted for approximately 1.6% of the decrease in revenue at Group level;

the fall in the price of recycled materials in the Environmental Services Division, which accounted for approximately 0.8% of the decrease in revenue at Group level;

a fall in energy prices, which accounted for approximately 0.4% of the decrease in revenue at Group level;

a reduction in construction work in the Water Division. Growth in engineering-construction activity in the Water Division slowed in 2009, marked by the near completion of some significant construction contracts outside France.

For the first time since the start of the crisis, activity levels stabilized in the fourth quarter of 2009 in the Environmental Services Division, at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates, compared with the fourth quarter of 2008.

External growth was 0.2% (€87.9 million) and was mainly attributable to acquisitions in 2008 and divestitures in 2009.

Revenue from outside France totaled €20,795.6 million, representing 60.2% of total revenue compared with 59.6% in 2008.

The negative impact of the change in average foreign exchange rates between 2008 and 2009 of €326.9 million mainly reflects the depreciation against the Euro of the pound sterling for €238.3 million, central European currencies (Czech Republic and Poland) for €173.8 million and Northern European currencies (Norway and Sweden) for €87.5 million, partially offset by the appreciation of the U.S. dollar for €162 million.

Overall, revenue fell 2.7% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates, mainly due to the decrease in activity in the Environmental Services Division (drop of 7.8% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates).



79



Back to Contents


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenuerevenues by division:Division in 2009 and 2008:


(in € millions, except for %)

2006

2005 (adjusted)

% change 2006/2005

    

Water

10,087.6

9,134.2

10.4%

Environmental Services

7,462.9

6,748.7

10.6%

Energy Services

6,118.4

5,463.6

12.0%

Transportation

4,951.5

4,223.9

17.2%

Total revenue

28,620.4

25,570.4

11.9%

Total revenue at constant 2005 exchange rate

28,631.0

25,570.4

11.9%

(€ million)

Year ended
December 31, 2009

Year ended
December 31, 2008

% Change
2009/2008

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Revenue

12,555.9

9,055.8

7,078.6

5,860.7

34,551.0

12,557.9

9,972.5

7,446.3

5,788.1

35,764.8

0.0%

-9.2%

-4.9%

1.3%

- -3.4%

Revenue at 2008 exchange rates

34,877.9

35,764.8

-2.5%


Water


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenue within the water division:


2006

(in € millions)

2005 adjusted

(in € millions)

% change 2006/2005

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

10,087.6

9,134.2

10.4%

9.1%

1.2%

0.1%


In France, organic revenue growth was 3.6%, excluding Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies, due to a good performance of the distribution businesses as well as further growth in the water network building and renovation business.

Outside France, excluding Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies and Proactiva, revenue grew 13.6% (11.8% at constant scope and exchange rates).  In Europe, revenue growth of 11.4% was driven by the start-up of new contracts, in particular in Germany (the Braunschweig municipal contract), in the Czech Republic (Hradec Kralove and Prostejov) and in Slovakia (Poprad and Banska Bystrica). In the Asia-Pacific region, strong revenue growth of 36.2% (of which 26.9% was organic growth) was mainly driven by new contracts signed in China (Hohhot, Changzhou, Kunming and Urumqui in the municipal sector). External growth in this region was the result of Veolia Water’s increased stake in the Adelaide contract in Australia and small acquisitions in Japan. We are continuing  our expansion in Africa and the Middle East where growth exceeded 12%. In North America, revenue grew 6.7% for the full-year on a like-fo r-like basis.  




Back to contents



Veolia Water Solutions and Technologies posted revenue growth of 17.8% at constant scope and exchange rates, driven in particular by a sharp upturn in the engineering and construction businesses in France, the Middle East and the United States.  Including acquisitions made during the year, revenue growth totaled 21.8%.

Environmental Services


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenuerevenues within the Environmental Services (waste management) division:water Division in 2009 and 2008:

Year ended December 31, 2009
(€ million)

Year ended December 31,
2008
(€ million)

% Change
2009/2008

Internal
growth

External
growth

Foreign
exchange
impact

12,555.9

12,557.9

0.0%

-0.4%

0.6%

-0.2%


2006

(in € millions)

2005 adjusted

(in € millions)

% change 2006/2005

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

7,462.9

6,748.7

10.6%

7.6%

3.5%

(0.5)%


In the Environmental Services (waste management) business, revenueFrance, activity levels remained stable (+0.1% on a current basis and -0.3% at constant consolidation scope), despite a 0.2% fall in France grew 4.1% (of which 3.7% was organic growth), driven by the combined effect of the growing contribution of new incineration plantsvolumes distributed compared to 2008 and the increased tonnages of solid waste collected and treated under high value added service contracts.a slight decrease in engineering activity (-2% at constant consolidation scope).

Outside France and excluding Proactiva, organic growth was 10.8%. It was particularly strong (13.2%)Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies, revenue increased by 0.4% (+0.2% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates) despite several major BOT (Build Operate & Transfer) contracts in Europe and the Middle East and DBO (Design Build & Operate) contracts in Australia coming to the end of the construction phase. The fall of 3.7% in Europe (-0.4% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates) reflects the completion of construction work on BOT contracts in the United StatesKingdom and Brussels and a slight decrease in all business lines. In the United Kingdom, overall growth totaled 34.2% (of which 6.9%volumes. The 20.4% increase in revenue in Asia (12% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates) is mainly due to engineering work and scope extensions in certain Chinese metropolitan areas (primarily Shanghai, Shenzhen and Tianjin Shibei).

Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies reported a 2.2% decrease in revenue to €2,469.9 million (-1.8% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates). Activity was organic growth), drivenaffected by the acquisitioncompletion of Cleanaway UK, completed on September 28, 2006certain major contracts outside France and by the general development ofslowdown in the business within a growing market. In Asia, the start-up of the Foshan and Guanghzou-Likeng contracts made a significant contribution to revenue growth of 14%.industrial economic environment.

EnergyEnvironmental Services


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenuerevenues within the energy services division:Environmental Services (waste management) Division in 2009 and 2008:

Year ended
December 31, 2009
(€ million)

Year ended
December 31,
2008
(€ million)

% Change
2009/2008

Internal
growth

External
growth

Foreign
exchange
impact

9,055.8

9,972.5

-9.2 %

-7.8%

-0.1%

-1.3%


The economic crisis affected volumes of solid and hazardous waste collected and treated on behalf of industrial customers, although to varying degrees depending on the country and activity sector, and also, to a lesser extent, municipal customers.



80


2006

(in € millions)

2005 adjusted

(in € millions)

% change 2006/2005

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

6,118.4

5,463.6

12.0%

10.0%

1.5%

0.5%


Back to Contents


Our Energy Services division generatedRevenue from sales of recycled materials (which contributed approximately 7% of Division revenue in 2009) remained down: average annual prices of €6.1 billionrecycled materials (paper, cardboard, ferrous and non-ferrous metal) remained significantly lower than in 2006, an increase2008, with the price of 12% over 2005,paper and cardboard reporting a progressive rise later in 2009. The price of which 10%ferrous metal and certain non-ferrous metals remains however significantly below 2008 levels.

In France, revenue slumped 10.8% (-9.3% at constant consolidation scope) due to a drop in industrial and commercial volumes linked to the economic slowdown and the decline in recycled material prices.

Outside France, activity reported a downturn of 8.6% (-7.4% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates). The majority of geographical areas were affected by the economic context. The 8.9% fall in revenue in Germany (-11.3% at constant consolidation scope), was organic growth. The full-year impactdue to a reduction in volumes and prices in the paper business and a decrease in industrial waste volumes. Revenue in the United Kingdom (down 12.9% on a current basis and down 3.7% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates) was affected by a decrease in industrial waste and volumes placed in landfill sites, although the positive contribution of integrated contracts helped limit this impact. In North America (down 4.2% on a current basis and down 9.1% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates), a decrease in volumes collected affected all businesses but was offset in certain cases by price increases. Th e Asia-Pacific region (down 7.8% on a current basis and down 8.6% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates) primarily suffered from a decrease in the riselevel of services and industrial waste.

At constant consolidation scope and exchange rates, revenue was stable in energy prices was €260 million, of which €226 million was realized during the first nine months of 2006.  The fourth quarter represents a new heating season, during which prices stabilized or declinedof 2009 compared to the first three quarters, although our Energy Services business continued to grow during this period.  Excludingfourth quarter of 2008, reflecting the full year price effect, organic revenue growth was 7.2%.

The business was subject to contrasting weatherstabilization of economic conditions over the course of the year.  While the beginning of the year had experienced more harsh temperatures than the average, the end of the year, on the contrary, was warmer than the seasonal standards.

InFrance, organic growth of 8.2% resulted primarily from the increase in energy prices in the first quartersecond half of the year, the start-up of new contracts and an upturn in the engineering business.

Outside France, revenue growth totaled 17.0% of which12.6% was organic growth. It was primarily driven by the full effect of the Lodz contract (Poland), favorable pricing in Central Europe as well as acquisitions in Italy and Brazil.2009.

TransportationEnergy Services


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenuerevenues within the transportation division:Energy Services Division in 2009 and 2008:

Year ended
December 31,
2009
(€ million)

Year ended
December 31,
2008
(€ million)

% Change
2009/2008

Internal
growth

External
growth

Foreign
exchange
impact

7,078.6

7,446.3

-4.9%

-2.2%

-0.8%

-1.9%


Energy Services Division revenue fell 4.9% (-2.2% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates). This decrease was mainly due to a slowdown in works and service activities on behalf of industrial customers and the negative effect of energy prices (-€139.5 million compared to 2008, primarily relating to natural gas sales that are made on a “pass-through” basis to customers). Overall, the impact of the weather was stable on 2009. The negative foreign exchange impact of €139.5 million is mainly attributable to Central European currencies.

In France, revenue fell 5.1% (-5.0% at constant consolidation scope) due to a negative price impact in the second half of the year and a slight contraction in the services business.

Outside France, the activity growth of 0.6% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates (a decline of 5% on a current basis) was due to the increase in energy prices in Central Europe and the Baltic States. Construction work and service activities on behalf of industrial customers fell in Europe and particularly Southern Europe.



81


2006

(in € millions)

2005 adjusted

(in € millions)

% change 2006/2005

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

4,951.5

4,223.9

17.2%

4.7%

12.9%

(0.4)%


Back to Contents


InFrance,Transportation

The following table shows a breakdown of our revenues within the Transportation Division in 2009 and 2008:

Year ended
December 31, 2009
(€ million)

Year ended
December 31,
2008

(€ million)

% Change
2009/2008

Internal
growth

External
growth

Foreign
exchange
impact

5,860.7

5,788.1

1.3%

0.4%

1.5%

-0.6%


Passenger transport revenue growth was 12.7%, driven byrose 0.5% in France (fall of 0.9% at constant consolidation scope). Price adjustments and new contract wins (TPMR Toulouse, Louviers Urban, “Fil Vert de Touraine”) offset the contribution of SNCM (2006 revenue contribution of approximately €200 million). The endimpact of the Toulouseloss of the Bordeaux contract in May 2009. Revenue was offsetalso negatively impacted by the positive impact of new contractsa decline in the field of urbanairport and intercity transit systems, and bytourism businesses, in particular due to the good performance of other business lines.economic environment.

Outside France, revenue advanced by 20.4%increased 1.7% (1.0% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates), reflecting the full-year impact of contracts that started mid-year in 2008 in North America and Germany, and despite the loss of the Melbourne contract in December and the Stockholm contract in November (negative impact of €34 million in 2009 compared to 2008) which 7.6% was organic growth. had a limited impact on 2009, but will have a more significant impact in 2010.

External growth was mainly due toof 1.5% reflects the expansion of the partnership with RATP in Asia (Hong Kong and Nanjing Zhongbei tramways in China) and limited acquisitions made in France and the United States (ATC and Shuttleport) and in Norway (Helgelandske).States.



82



Back to contentsContents



Revenue by geographical region


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenue by geographical region:region and Operating segment (Division):

Year ended
December 31,
2009

(€ million)

France

Germany

United
Kingdom

Other
European
countries

United
States

Oceania

Asia

Middle
East

Rest of
the world

Total

Water

4,751.2

1,371.8

640.0

1,637.9

690.5

255.8

1,162.0

857.5

1,189.2

12,555.9

Environmental Services

3,294.2

1,011.3

1,446.0

1,098.9

1,142.6

441.4

209.4

75.0

337.0

9,055.8

Energy Services

3,435.9

57.9

342.4

2,633.5

261.9

42.2

67.7

62.5

174.6

7,078.6

Transportation

2,274.1

526.3

49.8

1,440.9

858.0

560.8

61.6

22.6

66.6

5,860.7

Revenue

13,755.4

2,967.3

2,478.2

6,811.2

2,953.0

1,300.2

1,500.7

1,017.6

1,767.4

34,551.0


Year ended
December 31,
2008

(€ million)

France

Germany

United
Kingdom

Other
European
countries

United
States

Oceania

Asia

Middle
East

Rest of
the world

Total

Water

4,883.5

1,376.7

671.5

1,679.7

612.2

358.5

976.9

862.1

1,136.8

12,557.9

Environmental Services

3,693.9

1,108.8

1,667.7

1,195.6

1,178.8

479.3

226.7

79.9

341.8

9,972.5

Energy Services

3,625.1

57.8

487.9

2,595.1

322.0

53.4

56.0

60.6

188.4

7,446.3

Transportation

2,262.5

514.0

49.8

1,559.1

760.4

546.5

10.3

24.2

61.3

5,788.1

Revenue

14,465.0

3,057.3

2,876.9

7,029.5

2,873.4

1,437.7

1,269.9

1,026.8

1,728.3

35,764.8


Change

(€ million)

France

Germany

United
Kingdom

Other
European
countries

United
States

Oceania

Asia

Middle
East

Rest of
the world

Total

Water

(132.3)

(4.9)

(31.5)

(41.8)

78.3

(102.7)

185.1

(4.6)

52.4

(2.0)

Environmental Services

(399.7)

(97.5)

(221.7)

(96.7)

(36.2)

(37.9)

(17.3)

(4.9)

(4.8)

(916.7)

Energy Services

(189.2)

0.1

(145.5)

38.4

(60.1)

(11.2)

11.7

1.9

(13.8)

(367.7)

Transportation

11.6

12.3

0.0

(118.2)

97.6

14.3

51.3

(1.6)

5.3

72.6

Revenue

(709.6)

(90.0)

(398.7)

(218.3)

79.6

(137.5)

230.8

(9.2)

39.1

(1 213.8)

% Change

-4.9%

-2.9%

-13.9%

-3.1%

2.8%

-9.6%

18.2%

-0.9%

2.3%

-3.4%

% Change (at constant exchange rates)

-4.9%

-2.9%

-5.5%

1.1%

-2.8%

-8.6%

11.7%

-1.4%

3.7%

-2.5%




83


(€ millions, except %)

2006

2005

(adjusted)

% change
2006/2005

France

13,403.0

12,439.2

7.7%

United Kingdom

2,186.8

1,727.1

26.6%

Germany

1,992.9

1,817.3

9.7%

Other European countries

5,317.9

4,708.6

12.9%

United States

2,650.3

2,183.3

21.4%

Oceania

931.4

878.0

6.1%

Asia

770.9

597.3

29.1%

Rest of the world

1,367.2

1,219.6

12.1%

Revenue

28,620.4

25,570.4

11.9%


Back to Contents


FranceRevenue trends have been affected by the fallout from the economic crisis, which is nonetheless variable between geographical areas and depends in particular on the mix of different Group businesses and the relative weight of the Environmental Services Division.

InFrance

Revenue fell 4.9% in 2009; the Environmental Services business reported a slump of 10.8% in France (-9.3% at constant consolidation scope) due to a fall in industrial and commercial volumes associated with the economic slowdown and a decrease in the price of recycled materials.

The Water business also contracted primarily due to a 0.2% fall in volumes distributed compared to 2008. Finally, the Energy Services Division was affected by an unfavorable price effect in the second half of the year and a slight decrease in the services business.

Germany

The 2.9% fall in revenue was due to the marked decrease in activities in the Environmental Services Division (fall in the price of recycled raw materials and particularly paper and decrease in industrial and commercial waste collection volumes). Water Division activities were relatively stable and in particular the Braunschweig contract and activities in the Transportation Division enjoyed good organic growth.

United Kingdom

Revenue fell 5.5% in the United Kingdom, at constant exchange rates. Activity levels benefited from the ramp-up of new integrated contracts in the Environmental Services Division, despite a fall in volumes of close to 14% (collection and landfill sites). The decrease reported by the Water Division businesses was mainly due to the completion of a construction worksite in the non-regulated operations sector. Revenue in the Energy Services Division fell following the sale of Facilities Management activities in the United Kingdom.

Other European countries

Revenue growth at constant exchange rates was 1.1%. This was achieved thanks to the development of Energy Services businesses in the Baltic States and Central Europe (positive price and weather effects). Conversely, growth was dampened by the fall in volumes and prices of recycled materials in the majority of countries where the Environmental Services Division is present (in particular Norway), and the fall in activity in the Transportation (termination of Stockholm and Warsaw contracts) and Water (completion of work on the Brussels contract) Divisions.

United States

The fall of 2.8% at constant exchange rates was marked by the slump in activities in the Environmental Services Division due to the economic context (decrease in volumes across all businesses, partially offset by price increases). Activity in the Energy Services Division was penalized by the negative impact of the fall in the price of gas. Growth in the other sectors was achieved due to new contracts in the Transportation Division, the good resistance of construction activities and the start-up of the Milwaukee water-treatment contract, as well as increasing activity in Indianapolis in the Water Division.

Oceania

The slump of 8.6% at constant exchange rates was due to a fall in activities in the Environmental Services Division in Australia (mainly present in the services and industrial waste sectors) and the completion of construction work on the Gold Coast desalination plant in the Water Division.

Asia

The growth of 7.7%11.7% at constant exchange rates in Asia was drivenmainly realized by Veolia Energiethe Water Division, resulting from recent developments in China, and, to a lesser extent, by the Transportation and Energy Services Divisions with the start-up of new contracts, mainly in China and Korea (new subway line in Seoul in the Transportation Division).

Rest of the world (including the Middle-East)

The growth of 1.8% at constant exchange rates was mainly due to a growth in construction activities in the Water Division in the Middle-East and the development of Proactiva in South America (in particular the new concession contract in the Water Division in Guayaquil).



84



Back to Contents


Operating income

Operating income for the year ended December 31, 2009 was €2,020.1 million, compared to €1,960.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing an increase of 3.0% at current exchange rates (6.1% at constant exchange rates). This increase was realized despite a decline in both adjusted operating cash flow and adjusted operating income, primarily as a result of rising energythe fact that significant goodwill impairment charges were recorded in the Environmental Services Division in 2008.

The principal factors that impacted the change in operating income from the year ended December 31, 2008 to the year ended December 31, 2009 were the following:

the change in adjusted operating cash flow, which is discussed below under “—Adjusted Operating Cash Flow.”,

the €35 million impairment of operating financial assets in Italy in the Environmental Services Division in 2009, following a review of the business plan incorporating the expected outcome of contractual negotiations still in progress as of December 31, 2009,

net charges to operating provisions in 2009 (compared to a net reversal/release of provisions in 2008), primarily encompassing asset risks, operating risks and litigation risks on certain contracts, as well as fair value adjustments on derivatives used to hedge the prices (anof raw materials,

impairment losses of €405.6 million recorded in 2008 in respect of goodwill and intangible assets of Veolia Environmental Services Germany,

the negative impact of 5.5%the decrease in discount rates on site rehabilitation provisions of €56 million in 2009, compared to a reversal of €21 million in 2008, in the revenuesEnvironmental Services Division,

capital gains on disposals of €213.6 million in 2009 (including €99.0 million on the sale of Veolia Energie France), by Veolia EauPropreté Nettoyage et Multi-Services in the Environmental Services Division) compared to €114.1 million in 2008.

Net charges to operating depreciation and amortization increased from €1,663.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to €1,790.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, as a result of continued strong growthnew contracts and recent acquisitions. Net charges to operating provisions totaled €23.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to a reversal of €119.9 for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Cost of sales totaled €28,786.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 (83.3% of total revenue), compared to €30,013.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 (83.9% of total revenue). Selling costs and general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009 totaled €602.6 million and €3,338.1 million respectively, compared to €621.4 million and €3,218.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Selling costs and general and administrative expenses represented 11.4% of revenue in 2009, compared to 10.7% in 2008. The modest increase in selling costs and general and adminisitrative expenses relates primarily to an increase in insurance costs and new IT systems.

Overall, industrial and financial capital gains totaled €213.6 million in 2009 compared to €114.1 million in 2008. We also recorded capital gains in 2008 on the sale of Clemessy and Crystal and in 2009 on the sale of the US incineration activities (Montenay International) in the engineeringEnvironmental Services Division and construction sectors as well as continued solidFreight activities in the Transportation Division, which are recorded under income from discontinued operations, and thus are not included in operating income.



85



Back to Contents


Adjusted operating cash flow

Adjusted operating cash flow was €3,955.8 million in 2009, compared with €4 105.4 million in 2008, a decline of 3.6% at current exchange rates and 1.7% at constant exchange rates. The limited decline in adjusted operating cash flow from 2008 to 2009, in a difficult economic climate, demonstrates the Group’s ability to adapt its cost structure to a drop in volumes and prices. The decline in adjusted operating cash flow resulted primarily from lower results in the Environmental Services Division (volumes, prices of recycled materials sold). For the distributionGroup, this contraction was largely offset by a major effort to reduce costs which led to total savings in excess of €380 million compared to prior year costs on the same projects, and by the greater resilience of our other business by Veolia Propretéactivities to the business environment. The total cost savings included €126 mil lion realized pursuant to a supplementary cost reduction program in the Environmental Services Division due to the combined effectslowdown of the increased efficiencyeconomy, and €255 million pursuant to the Group’s overall Efficiency Plan.

In this way, the Group successfully maintained its adjusted operating cash flow margin (equal to adjusted operating cash flow as a percentage of incineration plantsrevenues) between 2008 and 2009 at 11.5%, despite the difficult economic environment.

The total negative exchange rate impact on adjusted operating cash flow of €78.4 million was primarily due to the depreciation of the pound sterling in the amount of €44.1 million, mainly in the Water and Environmental Services Divisions, and the increasedepreciation of Central European currencies in tonnagethe amount of solid waste collected€33.1 million, mainly in the Energy Services Division. These and treated under high value-added service contracts andother downward movements in currencies were partially offset by the acquisitionappreciation of SNCM by Veolia Transport.

United Kingdom

The strong growth of 26.6%the U.S. dollar in the United Kingdom resulted from the acquisitionamount of Cleanaway UK (three month effect), the full impact of the acquisition of Shanks€19.1 million, mainly in 2005 by the Environmental Services division, Veolia Énergie due to commercial development and an increase in energy prices, and the impact of five-year tariff reviews at Veolia Eau in 2005.

Germany

Growth in Germany was 9.7%, largely due to new contracts, particularly the contract between Braunschweig and Veolia Eau for a wastewater plant and rail transport contracts (Nordharz-Netz and Marschbahn).  

Other European countriesDivision.

The 12.9% growth in revenues was due to full-year effect of the Lodz contract in Polandfollowing table breaks down adjusted operating cash flow by Division, at both current and to the impact of prices in the Energy Division, as well as new contracts and small acquisitions in our other sectors.constant exchange rates:

United States

Growth in the United States, 21.4% overall, was particularly significant in Veolia Propreté’s business and in Veolia Transport due to the impact of recent developments, including the acquisitions of ATC and Shuttleport, and the signing of new contracts.  

Oceania

Growth of 6.1% in the Oceania region was due to the signing of new contracts in 2005 within Veolia Propreté and sustained activity within Veolia Transport.

Asia

Growth in Asia was 29.1%, which was due to recent developments in Veolia Eau (contracts in China and acquisitions in Japan) and to the start of new contracts for Veolia Propreté.




Back to contents
 

Adjusted operating cash flow

 

Year ended
December 31,
2009

Year ended
December 31,
2008

Change

 

Current
exchange
rates

Constant
exchange
rates

Water

1,836.6

1,821.3

0.8%

2.6%

Environmental Services

1,194.1

1,331.4

-10.3%

-8.8%

Energy Services

740.1

758.8

-2.5%

0.8%

Transportation

327.0

287.4

13.8%

14.7%

Holding companies

(142.0)

(93.5)

  

Adjusted operating cash flow

3,955.8

4,105.4

-3.6%

 

Adjusted operating cash flow at 2008 exchange rates

4,034.2

4,105.4

 

-1.7%




Rest of the world86

Growth in the rest of the world was 12.1%, marked by the continued growth of Veolia Eau in North Africa and the Middle East.


Operating Income


OverviewBack to Contents


Our operating income increased by 12.7%, from €1,892.9 million in 2005 to €2,132.9 million in 2006. The following table shows a breakdownreconciliation of our adjusted operating cash flow to our operating income by division:Division in 2009 and 2008:

(in € millions, except %)

2006

2005 (adjusted)

% change

 

Adjustments

Operating
Income

Year ended December 31, 2009
(€ million)

Adjusted
Operating
Cash
Flow

Net
(charges)/reversals
to operational
provisions

Net
depreciation
and
amortization
charges

Replacement
costs

Goodwill
Impairment

Net gains
on
divestitures (*)

Others
(**)

Water

1,160.6

1,002.3

15.8%

1,836.6

9.5

(498.0)

(245.7)

-

25.1

36.8

1,164.3

Environmental Services

648.3

543.6

19.3%

1,194.1

(54.2)

(807.2)

-

-

123.8

(2.7)

453.8

Energy Services

377.7

315.3

19.8%

740.1

(22.8)

(229.6)

(115.2)

(1.0)

43.5

0.5

415.5

Transportation

13.6

116.8

(88.3)%

327.0

52.1

(242.4)

-

(5.5)

21.2

0.5

152.9

Holding companies

(67.3)

(85.1)

20.9%

(142.0)

(8.3)

(12.9)

-

-

-

(3.2)

(166.4)

Total

2,132.9

1,892.9

12.7%

3,955.8

(23.7)

(1,790.1)

(360.9)

(6.5)

213.6

31.9

2,020.1

Total at constant 2005 exchange rate

2,126.8

1,892.9

12.4%


(*):

Primarily net gains on sale of Veolia Propreté Nettoyage et Multiservices for €99 milllions in the Environmental Services Division.

(**):

Primarily fair value adjustment on derivatives in the Water Division.


(*):

Primarily net gains on sale of Veolia Propreté Nettoyage et Multiservices for €99 milllions in the Environmental Services Division.

(**):

Primarily fair value adjustment on derivatives in the Water Division.


  

Adjustments

Operating
Income

Year ended December 31, 2008
(€ million)

Adjusted
Operating
Cash
Flow

Net
(charges)/reversals
to operational
provisions

Net
depreciation
and
amortization
charges

Replacement
costs

Goodwill
Impairment
(*)

Net gains on
divestitures

Others
(**)

Water

1,821.3

51.4

(468.3)

(263.6)

2.3

67.5

(12.1)

1,198.5

Environmental Services

1,331.4

(14.6)

(723.5)

-

(343.0)

16.3

(1.4)

265.2

Energy Services

758.8

13.2

(222.5)

(126.7)

5.0

11.6

(5.0)

434.4

Transportation

287.4

71.1

(238.3)

-

33.5

18.6

(1.8)

170.5

Holding companies

(93.5)

(1.2)

(11.3)

-

-

0.1

(1.9)

(107.8)

Total

4,105.4

119.9

(1,663.9)

(390.3)

(302.2)

114.1

(22.2)

1,960.8


(*)

Primarily goodwill impairment for German activities in the Environmental Services Division in 2008.

(**):

Primarily fair value adjustment on derivatives in the Water Division.


As discussed above under “PresentationFor a discussion of Informationadjusted operating cash flow by Division, see “—Adjusted Operating Cash Flow, Adjusted Operating Income and Operating Income by Division.”



87



Back to Contents


Adjusted Operating Income

Adjusted operating income was €1,932.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €2,275.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing a decline of 15.1% (-12.4% at constant exchange rates). Changes in this Section – Non-GAAP Measures,” we useoperating income and adjusted operating income in addition to operating income, to evaluate our results of operations and otherwisebreak down as a management tool.  follows:

 

Operating income

Adjusted operating income

 

Year ended December 31, 2009

Year ended December 31, 2008

% change

% change at constant exchange rates

Year ended December 31, 2009

Year ended December 31, 2008

% change

% change at constant exchange rates

Water

1,164.3

1,198.5

-2.9

-0.3

1,164.3

1,196.2

-2.7

-0.1

Environmental Services

453.8

265.2

71.1

75.5

359.8

620.2

-42.0

-40.1

Energy Services

415.5

434.4

-4.4

-0.3

416.4

429.4

-3.0

1.0

Transportation

152.9

170.5

-10.3

-9.8

158.3

137.0

15.6

16.2

Holding companies

(166.4)

(107.8)

  

(166.4)

(107.8)

  

Total

2,020.1

1,960.8

3.0

6.1

1,932.4

2,275.0

-15.1

-12.4

Total at 2008 exchange rates

2,080.7

1,960.8

  

1,993.0

2,275.0

  


The following table shows a breakdownreconciliation of our adjusted operating income to our operating income by division:Division in 2009 and 2008:

(in € millions, except %)

2006

2005 (adjusted)

% change

Year ended December 31, 2009

 

Adjustments

 

(€ million)

Adjusted

Impairment losses

Other

Total

Water

1,163.4

997.1

16.7%

1,164.3

-

-

1,164.3

Environmental Services

648.3

553.6

17.1%

359.8

-

94.0*

453.8

Energy Services

377.7

321.2

17.6%

416.4

(0.9)

-

415.5

Transportation

100.1

116.8

(14.3)%

158.3

(5.4)

-

152.9

Holding companies

(67.3)

(85.1)

20.9%

(166.4)

-

-

(166.4)

Total

2,222.2

1,903.6

16.7%

1,932.4

(6.3)

94.0

2,020.1

Total at constant 2005 exchange rate

2,216.1

1,903.6

16.4%


*

Represents primarily capital gains realized on the disposal of Veolia Propreté Nettoyage et Multi-Services.


*

Represents primarily capital gains realized on the disposal of Veolia Propreté Nettoyage et Multi-Services.


Year ended December 31, 2008

 

Adjustments

 

(€ million)

Adjusted

Impairment losses

Other

Total

Water

1,196.2

-

2.3

1,198.5

Environmental Services

620.2

(343.0)**

(12.0)

265.2

Energy Services

429.4

-

5.0

434.4

Transportation

137.0

(37.7)

71.2***

170.5

Holding companies

(107.8)

-

 

(107.8)

Total

2,275.0

(380.7)

66.5

1,960.8


**

Represents primarily impairment charges relating to Veolia Environmental Services Germany.

***

Represents primarily badwill recorded in the income statement related to the purchase of minority interests in SNCM.



88



Back to Contents


Adjusted Operating Cash Flow, Adjusted Operating Income and Operating Income - Divisions

Water

The following tables provide a reconciliation ofWater Division reported adjusted operating incomecash flow of €1,836.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €1,821.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing an increase of 2.6% at constant exchange rates (0.8% at current exchange rates). The adjusted operating income for 2005cash flow margin increased from 14.5% in 2008 to 14.6% in 2009, reflecting an increase in the margin on operating activities and 2006:a decrease in the margin on construction activities.


2006

Total Operating
Income

Adjustments

Adjusted

Operating Income

(€ millions)

Impairment

Other

Water

1,160.6

2.8

-

1,163.4

Environmental Services

648.3

-

-

648.3

Energy Services

377.7

-

-

377.7

Transportation

13.6

86.5

-

100.1

Holding companies

(67.3)

-

-

(67.3)

Total

2,132.9

89.3

-

2,222.2


In France, adjusted operating cash flow was affected by the decrease in volumes compared to 2008 and the slowdown in construction work associated with the current economic environment; it nonetheless benefited from further productivity gains and a positive indexing effect.

2005 (adjusted)

Total operating
income

Adjustments

Adjusted operating income

(€ millions)

 Impairment

Other

Water

1,002.3

(5.2)

-

997.1

Environmental Services

543.6

10.0

-

553.6

Energy Services

315.3

4.7

1.2

321.2

Transportation

116.8

-

-

116.8

Holding companies

(85.1)

-

-

(85.1)

Total

1,892.9

9.5

1.2

1,903.6


Outside France, the increase in Adjusted operating cash flow was significant, particularly in Asia thanks to tight control over overhead and development costs. In Europe the good resistance of activities offset the negative foreign exchange impact (particularly in the United Kingdom), despite a decrease in volumes delivered in 2009 and the one-off positive impact of the provisional acceptance of the Brussels plant in 2008. The Africa/Middle-East region reported an increase in Adjusted operating cash flow, mainly due to an increase in volumes and prices.

Finally, Veolia Water Solutions Technologies reported a decrease in Adjusted operating cash flow, due to a slowdown in business.

The Efficiency Plan had a positive impact on adjusted operating cash flow of €87 million in 2009.

Operating income grew by 12.7% in 2006declined modestly to €1,164.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to 2005, or by 12.4%€1,198.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, although it was essentially stable at constant exchange rates. Adjusted operating income grew by 16.7%, or by 16.4%was stable at constant exchange rates.  rates, but decreased by 2.7% at current exchange rates, to €1,164.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €1,196.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.

The increases reflectWater Division’s operating income was affected by an increase in operating depreciation and amortization charges between 2008 and 2009 and a decrease in net gains on disposals of industrial and financial assets. Net reversals to operating provisions totaled €9.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €51.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, primarily growthas a result of fair value adjustments in our revenuesrespect of hedging derivatives. Net charges to depreciation and overall businessamortization totaled €498.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €468.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Overall, the operating income margin (operating income as a percentage of revenue) and in the case of adjusted operating income an increasemargin (adjusted operating income as a percentage of revenue) fell from 9.5% in margins resulting from2008 to 9.3% in 2009.

Environmental Services

The Environmental Services Division reported adjusted operating cash flow of €1,194.1 million for the factors describedyear ended December 31, 2009, compared to €1,331.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing a decrease of 10.3% (or a decrease of 8.8% at constant exchange rates).

The fall in waste volumes and primarily industrial and hazardous waste volumes and the slump in the division-by-division analysis below, as well as the continued benefitsprice of our “Veolia Environnement 2005” efficiency plan, which resulted in selling, generalrecycled materials (paper and administrative expenses declining from 11.3% of revenues in 2005 to 10.9% of revenues in 2006.  Restructing costs increased marginally in 2006non-ferrous metal) compared to 2005, while capital gains2008, had a major impact on asset sales decreased marginally.




Back to contents



operating performance in this sector in all major countries (France, United Kingdom, Germany, Australia and the United States). The positive impact of the cost-cutting plan (€126 million in 2009) and the Efficiency Plan (€72 million) and the favorable impact of the fall in fuel prices progressively enabled a turnaround in trends which became positive at the year-end as economic conditions stabilized.

Operating income in 2006 represented 7.5% of revenuesEnvironmental Services was €453.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to 7.4%€265.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing an increase of 71.1% (+75.5% at constant exchange rates). This balance includes the capital gain realized on the sale of Veolia Propreté Nettoyage et Multi-Services of €99 million in 2005.  2009, compared to substantial impairment losses recognized in Germany (€405.6 million) in 2008.



89



Back to Contents


Adjusted operating income represented 7.8%was €359.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 (excluding the capital gain realized on the sale of revenuesVeolia Propreté Nettoyage et Multi-Services), compared to €620.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 (excluding the substantial impairment losses in 2006 and 7.4% in 2005.  In 2006, the only adjustments betweenGermany), representing a decrease of 42% (-40.1% at constant exchange rates).

Adjusted operating income andof the Environmental Services Division for the year ended December 31, 2009 includes a €35 million impairment of operating financial assets in Italy, following a review of the business plan incorporating the expected outcome of ongoing contractual negotiations. 2008 adjusted operating income wereincluded an impairment charge of €62.6 million on intangible assets recognized on the acquisition of Sulo.

The fall in adjusted operating income also includes a negative impact of €77 million compared to 2008, associated with the decrease in discount rates used as of December 31 each year to calculate site rehabilitation provisions. Net charges primarily resultingto operating provisions totaled €54.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €14.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Net charges to operating depreciation and amortization totaled €807.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €723.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.

The adjusted operating cash flow margin (adjusted operating cash flow as a percentage of revenues from difficulties with a German contractcontinued operations) decreased from 13.4% in 2008 to 13.2% in 2009. The improvement in the Transport division (as discussed below).  In 2005, our impairment charges related to Environmental Services activities in Israel and Sterienceadjusted operating cash flow margin rate in the fourth quarter of 2009 on the same period in 2008 was substantial, increasing from 11.8% in the 4th quarter of 2008 to 14.7% in the 4th quarter of 2009. The operating income margin (operating income as a percentage of revenue) increased from 2.7% in 2008 to 5.0% in 2009. However, the adjusted operating income margin (adjusted operating income as a percentage of revenue) fell from 6.2% in 2008 to 4.0% in 2009.

Energy Services

The Energy Services division.  We also recordedDivision reported adjusted operating cash flow of €740.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €758.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing a decrease of 2.5% (increase of 0.8% at constant exchange rates).

The Division’s adjusted operating cash flow benefited from the increase in energy prices (coal and electricity) in Central European countries and the Baltic States. Sales of CO2 allowances contributed less than in 2008. Finally, the reduction in construction work impacted the performance of certain entities, particularly in Southern Europe.

In France, adjusted operating cash flow was affected by the decrease in sales of CO2 allowances, the negative goodwillimpact of energy prices and the slowdown in the Water division.  industrial services business, despite the effects of the Efficiency Plan.

WaterThe Efficiency Plan had a positive impact of €56 million in 2009.


The adjusted operating cash flow margin increased from 10.2% in 2008 to 10.5% in 2009.

Operating income fromwas €415.5 million for the Water division totaled €1,160.6year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €434.4 million in 2006,for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing a 15.8% increase from €1,002.3 million recorded in 2005. decrease of 4.4% at current exchange rates (-0.3% at constant exchange rates).

Adjusted operating income grew by 16.7%, or by 16.3%was €416.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €429.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing a decrease of 3% at current exchange rates (increase of 1.0% at constant exchange rates.rates).

In France,Net charges to operating provisions totaled €22.8 million for the distributionyear ended December 31, 2009, compared to a net reversal of €13.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Net charges to operating depreciation and waterwork businesses performed well, boostingamortization totaled €229.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €222.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Overall, both the operating income margin and the adjusted operating income margin increased from 5.8% in 2008 to 5.9% in 2009.



90



Back to Contents


Transportation

The Transportation Division reported adjusted operating cash flow of €327.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €287.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing a rise of 13.8% (14.7% at constant exchange rates).

The increase in adjusted operating cash flow is attributable to the improved performance of operations previously generating insufficient profits as well as productivity gains, particularly in France, Northern Europe and North America, which also benefited fromoffset the continuing implementationfall in airport and tourist activities.

The positive impact on adjusted operating cash flow, net of hedging arrangements, of the programfall in fuel prices is estimated at approximately €22 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to improve operating performance.

Outside France, we recorded an increase in operating income that resulted from developments of the Stadtwerke in Braunschweig (including a positive adjustment to fair market value of an electricity supply contract), and from the beginning of new contracts in China and the impact of BOT contracts in Brussels andyear ended December 31, 2008. The Hague.  In addition, the effect of contractual price increases, including in the United Kingdom, Central Europe, Romania and Morocco,Efficiency Plan had a positive impact on adjusted operating income. Finally, engineering and technology solutions took another step toward recovery.cash flow of €40 million in 2009.

The ratio ofadjusted operating cash flow margin increased from 5.0% in 2008 to 5.6% in 2009, whereas overall, the operating income margin fell from 2.9% in 2008 to 2.6% in 2009. The adjusted operating income to revenue from ordinary activities increased by 0.6 points, from 10.9% in 2005 to 11.5% in 2006.  The ratio of operating income to revenue from ordinary activitiesmargin increased from 11.0%2.3% in 20052008 to 11.5%2.7% in 2006.

Environmental Services


2009.

Operating income from the Environmental Services division increased by 19.3%, from €543.6 million in 2005 to €648.3 million in 2006.

In France, operating income increased as a result of an increase in volume, primarily in the incineration sec tor and in the landfill business.

Outside France, we recorded an increase in operating income, which was was especially strong in the UK market due to the integration of Cleanaway United Kingdom in the fourth quarter of 2006 and the strong performance of integrated waste management contracts.  In the United States, the operating margin noticeably increased in the industrial services that are experiencing strong growth and in the solid waste activities due to increased prices.

The ratio of adjusted operating income to revenue increased from 8.2% in 2005 to 8.7% in 2006. The ratio of operating income to revenue from ordinary activities increased from 8.1% in 2005 to 8.7% in 2006.

Energy Services


Operating income from the Energy Services division increased by 19.8%, from €315.3 million in 2005 to €377.7 million in 2006. At constant exchange rates adjusted operating income grew by 16.2%.

In France, profitability benefited from improvements in construction activities (both the level of activity and better efficiency). Given the overall balanced nature of the contract portfolio, the rise in energy prices had only a slight effect on profitability. As in 2005, rising gas prices have caused the selling prices of electricity produced through co-generation to reach their ceiling. This phenomenon had limited effect, and the opportunity loss was offset by an upturn in energy management margins on other contracts and by the sale of surplus greenhouse gas emission rights generated by activities.

In the rest of Europe, we recorded a strong rise in operating income in Central European countries that resulted notably from prices and a favorable climate in the Czech Republic and Poland and from the commencement of new contracts, such as the Lodz contract. A decrease in profit margin recorded in various countries following the increase in gas prices was more than offset by the sale of surplus greenhouse gas emission rights generated by activities.  

Given these items, the ratio of adjusted operating income to revenue increased, from 5.9% in 2005 to 6.2% in 2006.  The ratio of operating income to revenue from ordinary activities increased from 5.8% in 2005 to 6.2% in 2006.

Transportation


Operating income fromfor the Transportation divisionDivision was €13.6€152.9 million in 2006,for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €116.8€170.5 million in 2005. Due to persistent difficulties relating tofor the year ended December 31, 2008, representing a contract, Veolia Transport carried out a reviewdecrease of its activities in Germany and accounted for losses of €86.5 million, which were classified as non-recurring.  Excluding this non-recurring item, operating income decreased by 14.3% (14.5%10.3% (-9.8% at constant exchange rates). The decrease resulted in large part from the positive impact in 2008 of badwill recorded upon the purchase of minority interests in SNCM, which was only partially offset by goodwill impairment charges.

Adjusted operating income (which excludes the impact of badwill and goodwill impairment) was €158.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €100.1 million.€137 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing an increase of 15.6% (+16.2% at constant exchange rates).

In France,Net reversals of operating provisions totaled €52.1 million for the profitabilityyear ended December 31, 2009, compared to €71.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Net charges to operating depreciation and amortization totaled €242.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €238.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Unallocated operating income / (loss)

Unallocated operating loss (representing operating income or loss of the Passengers Transportation business is improving, resulting mainlyof holding company activities) was €107.8 million in 2008 and €166.4 million in 2009. Adjusted operating loss of holding companies was identical to operating loss in both years. The adjusted operating cash flow of holding companies fell from interurban activities and services in Ile de France, as well as the integration of the SNCM, whose results conform to expectations from its privatization.  




Back to contents



Outside France, solid performances were recordednegative €93.5 million in the Benelux countriesyear ended December 31, 2008 to negative €142.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2009.

The increase in costs for the year is mainly due to a rise in mutual insurance costs following an increase in the claims rate and Australia.  Operating income was also affected by acquisitionsthe cost of transactions in North America,progress at year-end and particularly ATCthe combination of Veolia Transport and Shuttleport, and by a dilution profit of €18.7 million resulting from the EBRD’s acquisition of an interest in Central European activities.

Because of the negative impact of rising energy prices, the ratio of adjusted operating income to revenue decreased from 2.8% in 2005 to 2.0% in 2006. The ratio of operating income to revenue from ordinary activities declined from 2.8% in 2005 to 0.3% in 2006.Transdev.

Net Finance costs net


Finance costs, net, decreased from €710.7 million in 2005 to €701.0 million in 2006.  Finance costs, net represent the cost of gross financial fair value debt, including profit and loss on related interest rate and exchange rate hedging, less income on cash and cash equivalents. The following table shows a breakdown of our finance costs, net:

(€ million)

Year ended
December 31, 2009

Year ended
December 31, 2008

Income

96.1

202.2

Expenses

(880.4)

 (1,111.2)

Finance costs, net

(784.3)

(909.0)


(€ millions)

2006

2005
(adjusted)

Income

82.8

63.3

Expense

(783.8)

(774.0)

Total finance costs, net

(701.0)

(710.7)


In 2006,Net finance costs decreased whereas the average financial debt rose from €16,142 million in 2008 to €16,466 million in 2009. This decline in net finance costs was attributable to the reduction in the financing rate defined asfrom 5.61% in 2008 to 4.76% in 2009. The “financing rate” is equal to the ratio between the cost of net financial debt (equal to financefinancing costs, net, excluding fair value adjustments to non-qualifying for hedge instruments) to average net indebtedness (based on a quarterly weighted average), was stable at 5.07% in both 2005 and 2006.

This stability, which was maintained despite an increase in short-term euro interest rates, was due to the increase in the portion of fixed rate debt in our indebtedness and the maturity of certain high interest rate debt.  The €26 million redemption premium paid in 2005 in connection with the redemption fo €1,150 million of convertible bonds wasinstruments that do not included in the 2005 financing rate, although the relatively low interest rate did affect the 2005 financing rate.

In addition, fair value adjustments on derivative instruments not qualifyingqualify for hedge accounting, totaled €6.4 million, compared to €10.1 million in 2005. These adjustments, which are calculated in accordance with IAS 39average monthly net financial debt for the period. See Item 5: “Liquidity and which depend on market conditions at the endCapital Resources – Net Financial Debt” for a discussion of the period, are highly volatile in nature.net financial debt.



91



Back to Contents




This decrease by approximately 1% in the financing rate was primarily due to:


Back

the decline in short-term rates for the floating-rate portion of debt (particularly Eonia, Euribor, Libor GBP and USD);

partially offset by the return on cash and cash equivalents (cash arising from a €2 billion bond issue on April 24, 2009) invested in short-term low risk instruments offering a return comparable to contents


Eonia.


Other Financial Income and Expenses


(Expenses)

The following table shows a breakdown of our other financial income (expenses):


(€ millions)

2006

2005
(adjusted)

Loan income

29.9

37.0

Dividends

9.7

6.5

Foreign exchange gains (losses)

(14.3)

14.3

Financial provisions

(8.4)

24.2

Other income (expenses)

(50.9)

(53.9)

Total

(34.0)

28.1

(€ million)

Year ended
December 31, 2009

Year ended
December 31,2008

Net gains on loans and receivables

13.9

43.3

Net gains and losses on available-for-sale assets (including dividends)

8.0

9.3

Assets and liabilities at fair value through profit and loss

(22.9)

35.1

Unwinding of the discount on provisions

(83.0)

(73.3)

Foreign exchange gains and losses

(10.7)

(42.8)

Other

(15.6)

(10.8)

Other financial income and expenses

(110.3)

(39.2)


Other financial expenses increased from €39.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to €110.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. This was mainly due to a €29.4 million decrease in net financial incomegains on loans and expenses were positive €28.1receivables, and a €58 million negative difference in fair value adjustments on assets recorded at fair value through profit and loss, of which €60 million related to the indexation clauses in Water Division contracts. In addition, improved currency management resulted in a reduction in foreign exchange losses from €42.8 million in 2005 and negative €34.02008 to €10.7 million in 2006.  The decline in other financial income and expenses principally resulted from the impact of the foreign exchange gains and losses (negative impact of €28.6 million), the revaluation of embedded derivatives negtative impact of €13.8 million) and provisions of €8.4 million in 2006 linked to guarantees issued by the subsidiaries of Veolia Propreté in Asia.

In 2006, the unwinding of discounts of long term provisions had a negative impact of €15.9 million, compared with  a negative impact of €17.3 million in 2005.  The revaluation of embedded derivatives had a negative impact of €16.3 million in 2006, compared with a negative impact of €2.5 million in 2005.


2009.

Income Tax Expense

The consolidated income tax expense of the Group for the year ended December 31, 2009 was €242.2 million compared to €462.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.

As a percentage of pre-tax net income from continuing operations (adjusted to eliminate our share in the net income of associates),, the effective tax rate was 21.5% for 2009, compared to 45.6% for 2008. The decline in this rate was mainly attributable to the inclusion in the 2008 effective tax rate of the impacts of unfavorable changes in tax legislation, asset impairments with no tax savings and the contribution of loss-making subsidiaries which have no prospects of recovery (inventory effect). In contrast, the 2009 tax rate includes the positive impacts arising from disposal gains taxed at low rates.


Share of Net Income of Associates

Income tax expense totaled €409.6The share of net income from associates decreased from €19.4 million in 2006, consisting of €330.92008 to €1.4 million in current income taxes and €78.7 million in deferred income taxes, compared to a total expense of €422.4 million in 2005, consisting of €309.4 million in current income taxes and a deferred income tax benefit of €113.0 million.

The decrease in tax expense in 2006 was2009, mainly due to the restructuringdivestiture in 2009 of our U.S. tax group, which generated a deferred tax credit of €86.2 million (included in “Other countries”Compagnie Méridionale de Navigation in the deferred tax expenseTransportation Division.

Net Income / (Loss) from Discontinued Operations

The net loss from discontinued operations totaled €42.8 million in 2009, compared to net income of €139.2 million in 2008. The 2009 net loss was mainly due to the gains and losses arising from the divestiture of Freight activities (Veolia Cargo) in the notesTransportation Division in December 2009 and the incineration business in the United States within the Environmental Services Division in August 2009. It also includes the net income or loss from activities in the United Kingdom in the Transportation Division and Renewable Energy activities in the Energy Services Division in the process of being sold at the year-end. In 2008, the net income mainly included the capital gain arising from the disposal of Clemessy and Crystal in the Energy Services Division for a net amount of €176.5 million, with a share attributable to our consolidated financial statements).  Apart fromnon-controlling interests of €60 million.



92



Back to Contents


Net income for the year attributable to non-controlling interests

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests was €257.8 million in 2009, compared to €304.1 million in the previous year. In 2008, this credit, an increaseincome included the capital gain realized on the divestiture of Clemessy and Crystal in our scopethe Energy Services Division of consolidation and pre-tax€60 million.

Net income increased bothattributable to equity holders of the current and deferred tax expense.  parent

We have classifiedNet income for the non-recurring U.S. credit as an adjustment itemyear attributable to equity holders of the parent totaled €584.1 million in calculating our adjusted2009, compared to €405.1 million in 2008. Adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent was €538.1 million in 2009, compared to €687.2 million in 2008.

After adjustment for the share dividend distribution in 2009, basic and diluted earnings per share attributable to equity holders of the parent were both €1.24 in 2009, compared to €0.88 (basic) and €0.87 (diluted) in 2008. Basic and diluted adjusted net income per share attributable to equity holders of the parent were both €1.14 in 2009, compared to €1.49 (basic) and €1.48 (diluted) in 2008. See Item 3, “Key Information – Selected Financial Data” for information on the weighted average number of shares outstanding in each period.

Adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent for the year ended December 31, 2009 is determined as discussed below.follows:

Year ended December 31, 2009(€ million)

Adjusted Net Income

Adjustments

Net Income

Operating income

1,932.4

87.7(1)

2,020.1

Net finance costs

(784.3)

-

(784.3)

Other financial income and expenses

(110.3)

-

(110.3)

Income tax expense

(242.2)

-

(242.2)

Share of net income of associates

1.4

-

1.4

Net income from discontinued operations

-

(42.8)

(42.8)

Non-controlling interests

(258.9)

1.1

(257.8)

Net income attributable to owners of the Company

538.1

46.0

584.1

(1)

Adjustments to operating income are described above under “Operating Income – Adjusted Operating Income”.


Adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent for the year ended December 31, 2008 is determined as follows:

Year ended December 31, 2008(€ million)

Adjusted Net Income

Adjustments

Net Income

Operating income

2,275.0

(314.2) (1)

1,960.8

Net finance costs

(909.0)

-

(909.0)

Other financial income and expenses

(39.2)

-

(39.2)

Income tax expense

(420.1)

(41.9) (2)

(462.0)

Share of net income of associates

19.4

-

19.4

Net income from discontinued operations

-

139.2

139.2

Non-controlling interests

(238.9)

(65.2) (3)

(304.1)

Net income attributable to owners of the Company

687.2

(282.1)

405.1

Published net income attributable to owners of the Company

658.6

(253.5)

405.1

(1)

 Adjustments to operating income are described above under “Operating Income – Adjusted Operating Income.

(2)

Impairment charge in respect of deferred tax assets in Germany in the Environmental Services Division following the review of the Veolia Propreté Germany business plan.

(3)

 Primarily the share attributable to non-controlling interests of €60 million arising from the disposal of Clemessy and Crystal in the Energy Services Division.




93



Back to Contents


Year ended December 31, 2008 compared to year ended December 31, 2007

Revenue for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

Overview

The following table shows a breakdown of our revenues in 2008 and 2007:

2008

(in € millions)

2007

(in € millions)

% change 2008/2007

Internal growth

External growth

Foreign Exchange
Impact

35,764.8

31,574.1

13.3%

9.6%

6.1%

-2.4%


Our consolidated revenue for the year ended December 31, 2008 amounted to €35,764.8 million compared to €31,574.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, an increase of 13.3% at current exchange rates and 15.7% at constant exchange rates. Internal growth was 9.6%, including internal growth of 13.4% recorded outside France.

External growth was 6.1%, particularly due to acquisitions by Veolia Propreté in Germany, Italy and France (total contribution of €828.6 million in 2008), by Veolia Energie in the United States (€303.5 million) and by Veolia Eau, primarily in the United Kingdom and Japan (total contribution of approximately €268.4 million). The contribution of acquisitions enabled us to accelerate our growth outside France, where revenue totaled €21,299.7 million or 59.6% of total revenue, compared to 57.1% in 2007.

The net negative impact of foreign exchange rates of €751.7 million mostly reflected the depreciation of the US dollar (negative €179.6 million) and the British pound (negative €422.5 million), partially offset by the appreciation of the Czech Koruna (€109.0 million).

The following table shows a breakdown of our revenues by Division in 2008 and 2007:

(In € millions, except for %)

2008

2007

% change 2008/2007

    

Water

12,557.9

10,927.4

14.9%

Environmental Services

9,972.5

9,057.2

10.1%

Energy Services

7,446.3

6,200.4

20.1%

Transportation

5,788.1

5,389.1

7.4%

Total revenue

35,764.8

31,574.1

13.3%

Total revenue at constant 2007 exchange rate

36,516.5

31,574.1

15.7%


Water

The following table shows a breakdown of our revenues within the Water Division in 2008 and 2007:

2008

(in € millions)

2007

(in € millions)

% change 2008/2007

Internal growth

External growth

Foreign
Exchange Impact

12,557.9

10,927.4

14.9%

13.4%

3.3%

-1.8%


In France internal growth amounted to 3.4% (excluding foreign construction subsidiaries and entities), as a result of price indexing, a wider service offering and growth in engineering work, which offset the approximately 1.9% drop in the volume of water distributed in 2008 as compared to 2007.



94



Back to Contents


Outside France and excluding Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies, revenue increased by 16.5% (12.3% on a constant consolidation scope and exchange rate basis). In Europe, growth of 13.2% (8.5% on a constant consolidation scope and exchange rate basis) reflected the acquisition of new non-regulated water operations in the UK, the completion of the Brussels plant and strong activity in Germany. Sustained activity was also experienced in the Africa/Middle East region, with an increase of almost 14.1% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates (15.2% at current scope and exchange rates) due primarily to the Oman Sur and Mauritanian contracts. In the Asia/Pacific region, strong growth of 23.4% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates (32.9% at current scope and exchange rates) was largely fueled by the start up of new municipal and industrial contracts in China (L anzhou, Haikou and Tianjin), by increased volumes and the extension of the Shenzhen concession and by engineering activities in Australia (Sydney desalination contract). In the United States, growth of 8.8% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates (4.5% at current scope and exchange rates) mainly reflected the start up of the Milwaukee contract and good engineering activity levels in Indianapolis.

Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies reported revenue of €2,524.9 million in 2008, up 36.3% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates (34.2% at current scope and exchange rates), due to municipal and industrial design and build projects, in particular in the Middle East.

Environmental Services

The following table shows a breakdown of our revenues within the Environmental Services (waste management) Division in 2008 and 2007:

2008

(in € millions)

2007

(in € millions)

% change 2008/2007

Internal growth

External growth

Foreign
Exchange Impact

9,972.5

9,057.2

10.1%

4.3%

10.3%

-4.5%


In France, revenue increased by 11.2% (3.8% at constant consolidation scope). External growth was attributable to the acquisition of Bartin Aero Recycling Group, finalized in February 2008. Internal growth was bolstered by the sustained level of non-hazardous household and industrial waste processing activities (both landfill and incineration). However the economic slowdown, first observed in the third quarter of 2008 and which accelerated in the fourth quarter, brought an abrupt end to trends observed during the first half of the year. This slowdown had a particularly significant impact on the sorting, recycling and trading businesses, due to the sharp decrease in the price of recyclable paper and metals, as well as activities with industrial customers (decrease in volumes of both hazardous and non-hazardous waste).

Outside France, all of the Division’s regions contributed to internal growth of 4.4% (9.4% at current consolidation scope and exchange rates), which slowed considerably during the fourth quarter as a result of economic trends in North America, the UK and above all in Germany, where volumes fell significantly. For the year as a whole, growth in North America (7.8% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates and 1.6% at current consolidation scope and rates) was sustained by price increases in the solid waste sector, which offset the decrease in volumes, and by the strong market for hazardous waste management and industrial services. In the UK, growth amounted to 8.6% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates (6.7% decrease at current consolidation scope and exchange rates), reflecting in particular the new contracts won. In Germany, revenue was down compared to 2 007 beginning in the third quarter (18.9% decline in the second half of 2008 at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates), following the loss of several contracts in the used packaging business (such as DSD) as well as lower volumes in industrial waste management. The recycling business was also strongly affected by the decrease in prices for recycled materials. In Asia, the development of recently won contracts was a strong factor in internal growth of 22.0% (25% at current consolidation scope and exchange rates). Finally, growth of 14.4% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates (11.3% at current consolidation scope and exchange rates) in the Pacific region was attributable to growth in the waste collection and processing sector and industrial services.

External growth of 10.3% essentially reflected the acquisition of Veolia Propreté Germany (formerly SULO), which contributed revenue of €522.3 million in the first half of 2008 (SULO was consolidated as from July 2, 2007), of VSA Tecnitalia (formerly TMT) in Italy, which contributed revenue of €59.7 million in 2008, and of Bartin Aero Recycling Group in France (consolidated with effect from February 2008), which contributed revenue of €246.6 million in 2008.



95



Back to Contents


Energy Services

The following table shows a breakdown of our revenues within the Energy Services Division in 2008 and 2007:

2008

(in € millions)

2007

(in € millions)

% change 2008/2007

Internal growth

External growth

Foreign Exchange
Impact

7,446.3

6,200.4

20.1%

12.0%

8.7%

-0.6%


Total revenue increased by 20.1% as a result in particular of the increase in energy prices (impact of €473 million) and the acquisition of Thermal North America Inc. (TNAI) in the United States at the end of 2007.

In France, revenue increased 12.7% based on a constant consolidation scope (13.2% at current consolidation scope) as a result of the increased price of energy, more favorable weather conditions than in 2007 (in particular in the fourth quarter of 2008) and the good commercial development of dedicated subsidiaries.

Outside France, revenue grew by 28.2% (11.1% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates), as a result of both the increase in energy prices and commercial development in Europe as a whole, against the backdrop of stable weather conditions throughout Central Europe in comparison with 2007.

External growth of 8.7% mainly reflected the €303 million contribution of the TNAI acquisition in the United States at the end of 2007, as well as, to a lesser extent, the acquisition of Praterm in Poland and of smaller companies in Central and Southern Europe.

Transportation

The following table shows a breakdown of our revenues within the Transportation Division in 2008 and 2007:

2008

(in € millions)

2007

(in € millions)

% change 2008/2007

Internal growth

External growth

Foreign Exchange
Impact

5,788.1

5,389.1

7.4%

7.7%

1.8%

-2.1%


Revenue increased by 7.1% in France based on a constant consolidation scope (7.8% at current consolidation scope), underpinned by the Division’s continuing development in urban and intercity transport.

Outside France, revenue increased by 8.5% (at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates), due to the full effect of the new contracts signed in North America and Germany and of strong growth in Australia.

External growth of 1.8% principally reflected the acquisition of People Travel Group in Sweden in 2007.



96



Back to Contents


Revenue by geographical region

The following table shows a breakdown of our revenue by geographical region and Operating segment (Division):

December 31, 2008

(in € million)

France

Germany

United
Kingdom

Other
European
countries

United
States

Oceania

Asia

Middle
East

Rest
of the
world

Total

Water

4,883.5

1,376.7

671.5

1,679.7

612.2

358.5

976.9

862.1

1,136.8

12,557.9

Environmental Services

3,693.9

1,108.8

1,667.7

1,195.6

1,178.8

479.3

226.7

79.9

341.8

9,972.5

Energy Services

3,625.1

57.8

487.9

2,595.1

322.0

53.4

56.0

60.6

188.4

7,446.3

Transportation

2,262.5

514.0

49.8

1,559.1

760.4

546.5

10.3

24.2

61.3

5,788.1

Revenue

14,465,0

3,057.3

2,876.9

7,029.5

2,873.4

1,437.7

1,269.9

1,026.8

1,728.3

35,764.8


December 31, 2007

(in € million)

France

Germany

United
Kingdom

Other
European
countries

United
States

Oceania

Asia

Middle
East

Rest
of the
world

Total

Water

4,927.2

1,276.9

573.4

1,413.0

539.3

299.8

732.8

313.9

851.1

10,927.4

Environmental Services

3,332.0

787.9

1,776.0

993.5

1,158.7

430.7

181.4

63.3

333.7

9,057.2

Energy Services

3,183.3

56.5

473.5

2,159.9

15.3

69.1

42.3

52.5

148

6,200.4

Transportation

2,104.8

480.7

43.1

1,462.2

710.0

508.6

4.5

17.3

57.9

5,389.1

Revenue

13,547.3

2,602.0

2,866.0

6,028.6

2,423.3

1,308.2

961.0

447.0

1,390.7

31,574.1


Change

(in € million)

France

Germany

United
Kingdom

Other
European
countries

United
States

Oceania

Asia

Middle
East

Rest
of the
world

Total

Water

-43.7

99.8

98.1

266.7

72.9

58.7

244.1

548.2

285.7

1,630.5

Environmental Services

361.9

320.9

-108.3

202.1

20.1

48.6

45.3

16.6

8.1

915.3

Energy Services

441.8

1.3

14.4

435.2

306.7

-15.7

13.7

8.1

40.4

1,245.9

Transportation

157.7

33.3

6.7

96.9

50.4

37.9

5.8

6.9

3.4

399.0

Revenue

917.7

455.3

10.9

1,000.9

450.1

129.5

308.9

579.8

337.6

4,190.7

Variance (%)

6.8%

17.5%

0.4%

16.6%

18.6%

9.9%

32.1%

129.7%

24.3%

13.3%

Variance at constant exchange rate (%)

6.8%

17.5%

15.1%

15.3%

26.2%

18.2%

37.1%

135.1%

27.6%

15.7%




97



Back to Contents


France

Revenue increased by 6.8% in France as a result of the impact of energy prices in the Energy Services Division, continued vigorous growth in engineering and construction work in the Water Division and sustained growth in inter-city activities (in particular in the Greater Paris region) in the Transportation Division. Growth reported by Veolia Propreté was primarily related to the acquisition of Bartin in February 2008.

Germany

The 17.5% increase in revenue in Germany was mainly attributable to the acquisition of Veolia Propreté Germany, an increase in Braunschweig contract sales (Veolia Eau) and internal growth in rail operations (Veolia Transport).

United Kingdom

Revenue increased by 15.1% in the United Kingdom, on a constant exchange rate basis, due in part to new integrated contracts in the Environmental Services Division, commercial development and focused acquisitions in Veolia Energy Services and the acquisition of Thames Water unregulated water operations by Veolia Eau. The impact of the decline of the pound offset this growth in revenues from operations.

Other European countries

The 15.3% increase in revenue at constant exchange rates in Other European countries was primarily due to the acquisition of Praterm, the development of Veolia Energy Services activities in Southern and Northern Europe, the acquisition of VES Tecnitalia by Veolia Propreté in Italy, the growth of activities in Central Europe and the completion of work at the Brussels plant by Veolia Eau.

United States

The 26.2% increase in revenue at constant exchange rates in the United States was due to marked growth across all Veolia Propreté businesses, the full-year effect of new contracts within Veolia Transport, the impact of the acquisition of Thermal North America Inc. by Veolia Energie at the end of 2007, the start-up of the Milwaukee contract and sustained engineering activities in Indianapolis in the Water Division.

Oceania

The 18.2% increase in revenues at constant exchange rates in Oceania was boosted by Veolia Eau contracts in Australia (desalination plant in Sydney), Veolia Propreté activities (particularly the Woodlawn contract) and increased revenue from the Veolia Transport Melbourne contract.

Asia

The 37.1% increase in revenue on a constant exchange rate basis in Asia resulted from recent developments with the Water Division (contracts wins in China and acquisitions in Japan) and, to a lesser extent, the start-up of new contracts for Veolia Propreté and Veolia Energie.

Rest of the world

Revenue increased by 53.7% at constant exchange rates in the rest of the world as a result of sustained growth recorded by Veolia Eau in Africa and the Middle East (contract in Mauritania and Oman Sur BOT contract).



98



Back to Contents


Operating Income

The Group’s operating income decreased by 20.3%, from €2,461.1 million in 2007 to €1,960.8 million in 2008. The change reflected primarily the impact of impairment charges, as well as increased depreciation and amortization relating to new contracts and acquisitions.

At the Group level, operating income in 2008 benefited from the development of new business activities, recent acquisitions, strong performance in the Energy Services Division and the favorable impact of our productivity plan. These benefits were offset, however, by the following negative impacts:

foreign exchange movements (negative impact of €72.0 million), reflecting in particular the appreciation of the euro against the other principal currencies where the Group operates;

the deterioration in operating performance of the Environmental Services Division, with a particularly unfavorable business climate beginning in the third quarter (prices and volume), despite the restructuring actions taken in Germany during the second half of the year (new management team, shutdown of two regional offices and restructuring plan);

the increase in development costs and other overheads, primarily in Asia; and

cost increases, particularly for fuel, not passed on to customers.

In addition to these effects, operating income reflects impairment losses recognized by Veolia Propreté Germany of €405.6 million (including €343 million for goodwill) and by the Transportation Division in Northern Europe (€38 million), which were partially offset by a badwill (€70 million) recorded upon the purchase of minority interests in SNCM in the Transportation Division.

Depreciation and amortization charges increased as a result of new contracts and recent acquisitions, with net operating depreciation and amortization, net of operating provisions, increasing from a charge of €1,427.4 million in 2007 to a charge of €1,544.0 million in 2008.

Overall the operating margin (operating income as a percentage of revenues) was 7.8% in 2007 compared to 5.5% in 2008 and adjusted operating income margin (adjusted operating income as a percentage of revenues) fell from 7.7% in 2007 to 6.4% in 2008.

Cost of sales in 2008 represented 83.9% of revenues compared to 81.4% in 2007, reflecting the cost increases described above. Selling, general and administrative costs remained essentially stable as a percentage of revenues, standing at 10.7% of revenue in 2008, compared to 11.0% in 2007. Other operating income (net of other operating expenses) declined primarily as a result of lower net capital gains on disposals, which were €48.9 million in 2008 compared to €106.5 million in 2007.

Overall, industrial and financial capital gains totaled €114.1 million in 2008 compared to €171.5 million in 2007. We also recorded capital gains in 2008 on the sale of Clemessy and Crystal, which are recorded under income from discontinued operations, and thus are not included in operating income.



99



Back to Contents


Adjusted Operating Cash Flow

The following table shows a breakdown of adjusted operating cash flow by Division at both current and constant exchange rates:

 

Adjusted operating cash flow

   

Change

 

Year ended
December 31,
2008

Year ended
December 31,
2007

Current
exchange
rates

Constant
exchange
rates

Water

1,821.3

1,851.3

-1.6%

0.6%

Environmental Services

1,331.4

1,427.2

-6.7%

-2.5%

Energy Services

758.8

641.7

18.2%

16.0%

Transportation

287.4

267.3

7.5%

8.6%

Holding companies

(93.5)

(69.7)

  

Adjusted operating cash flow

4,105.4

4,117.8

-0.3%

 

Adjusted operating cash flow at 2008 exchange rates

4194.8

4117.8

 

1.9%


The following tables show a reconciliation of our adjusted operating cash flow to our operating income by Division in 2008 and 2007:

  

Adjustments

Operating
Income

Year ended
December 31,
2008
(€ million)

Adjusted
Operating
Cash Flow

Net
(charges)/
reversals
to operating
provisions

Net
depreciation and
amortization
charges

Replacement
costs

Goodwill
Impairment (*)

Net gains on divestitures

Others
(**)

Water

1,821.3

51.4

(468.3)

(263.6)

2.3

67.5

(12.1)

1,198.5

Environmental Services

1,331.4

(14.6)

(723.5)

-

(343.0)

16.3

(1.4)

265.2

Energy Services

758.8

13.2

(222.5)

(126.7)

5.0

11.6

(5.0)

434.4

Transportation

287.4

71.1

(238.3)

-

33.5

18.6

(1.8)

170.5

Holding companies

(93.5)

(1.2)

(11.3)

-

-

0.1

(1.9)

(107.8)

Total

4,105.4

119.9

(1,663.9)

(390.3)

(302.2)

114.1

(22.2)

1,960.8


(*)

Primarily goodwill impairment for German activities in the Environmental Services Division in 2008.

(**)

Primarily fair value adjustment on derivatives in the Water Division.


  

Adjustments

Operating
Income

Year ended December 31, 2007
(€ million)

Adjusted
Operating
Cash Flow

Net (charges)/
reversals to
operating
provisions

Net
depreciation
and
amortization
charges

Replacement
costs

Goodwill
Impairment

Net gains
on
divestitures

Others

Water

1,851.3

44.0

(437.2)

(252.6)

2.0

80.2

(20.0)

1,267.7

Environmental Services

1,427.2

(24.2)

(671.2)

-

-

56.3

(6.3)

781.8

Energy Services

641.7

15.4

(170.5)

(105.8)

10.4

4.0

(10.9)

384.3

Transportation

267.3

64.7

(233.3)

-

5.8

31.0

(4.9)

130.6

Holding companies

(69.7)

(8.8)

(6.4)

-

-

-

(18.4)

(103.3)

Total

4,117.8

91.1

(1,518.6)

(358.4)

18.2

171.5

(60.5)

2,461.1




100



Back to Contents


Adjusted Operating Income

Adjusted operating income decreased by 6.5%, from €2,433.5 million in 2007 to €2,275.0 million in 2008. Adjusted operating income in 2008 (which excludes the impact of impairment charges and certain other items of income and expense, as described below), was €2,275.0 million (or €2,347.0 million based on 2007 exchange rates), compared to €2,433.5 million in 2007.

The following table shows a breakdown of operating income and adjusted operating income by Division in 2008 and 2007:

 

Operating income

Adjusted operating income

 

2008

2007

%
change

2008

2007

%
change

Water

1,198.5

1,267.7

-5.5%

1,196.2

1,265.7

-5.5%

Environmental Services

265.2

781.8

-66.1%

620.2

781.8

-20.7%

Energy Services

434.4

384.3

13.0%

429.4

373.8

14.9%

Transportation

170.5

130.6

30.6%

137.0

115.5

18.6%

Unallocated

(107.8)

(103.3)

4.4%

(107.8)

(103.3)

4.4%

Total

1,960.8

2,461.1

-20.3%

2,275.0

2,433.5

-6.5%

Total at 2007 exchange rates

2,032.8

2,461.1

-17.4%

2,347.0

2,433.5

-3.6%

 


The following tables show a reconciliation of the Group’s operating income and adjusted operating income by Division in 2008 and 2007:

2008

Adjusted

Adjustments

Total Operating
Income

(€ million)

Operating Income

Impairment

Other(1)

Water

1,196.2

-

2.3

1,198.5

Environmental Services

620.2

(343.0)

(12.0)(2)

265.2

Energy Services

429.4

-

5.0

434.4

Transportation

137.0

(37.7)

71.2(3)

170.5

Unallocated

(107.8)

-

-

(107.8)

Total

2,275.0

(380.7)

66.5

1,960.8

(1)

Including badwill.

(2)

Represents the provisions for the restructuring plan recorded in Germany in 2008.

(3)

Represents primarily the badwill recorded in the income statement related to the purchase of minority interests in SNCM.


2007

Adjusted

Adjustments

Total Operating

(€ million)

Operating Income

Impairment

Other(1)

Income

Water

1,265.7

 

2.0

1,267.7

Environmental Services

781.8

-

-

781.8

Energy Services

373.7

 

10.6

384.3

Transportation

115.4

(6.9)

22.1(2)

130.6

Unallocated

(103.1)

-

(0.2)

(103.3)

Total

2,433.5

(6.9)

34.5

2,461.1

(1)

Including badwill.

(2)

Represents primarily operating income resulting from the completion of our purchase of our interest in SNCM, as discussed under “—Transportation” below.




101



Back to Contents


Adjusted Operating Cash Flow, Adjusted Operating Income and Operating Income - Divisions

Water

The Water Division reported operating income of €1,198.5 million in 2008 compared with €1,267.7 million for 2007 a decrease of 5.5% (-2.9% at constant exchange rates). Adjusted operating income for 2008 amounted to €1,196.2 million, compared with €1,265.7 million for 2007. Adjusted operating cash flow was €1,821.3 in 2008 compared to €1,851.3 in 2007 a decrease of 1.6% (increase of 0.6% at constant exchange rates).

Net charges to operating depreciation and amortization totaled €468.3 million in 2008 compared to €437.2 million in 2007. Net reversals in operating provisions totaled a gain of €51.4 million in 2008 compared to €44.0 million in 2007.

The Division’s operating income was mainly affected by the increase in depreciation and amortization linked to new contracts won, particularly in Asia, and recent acquisitions. Apart from this, the principal factors that affected operating income were the following:

In France, operating income increased as a result of productivity initiatives, the development of new services and sustained engineering activities and was achieved despite a decrease in volumes delivered.

Outside France, the acquisition of unregulated water operations in the UK and the provisional acceptance of the Brussels plant were positive factors. In 2007, Veolia Eau benefited from the satisfactory resolution of a dispute with the Berlin Lander concerning drainage activities.

Improvements in the Division’s Gabon operations also contributed to an improvement in operating income. However, delays in price increases and increased development costs weighed heavily on the Division’s performance in Asia, and the Division’s American operations also showed a decline.

Finally, Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies also improved its operating income as its new contracts reached maturity.

The operating margin dropped from 11.6% in 2007 to 9.5% in 2008. Adjusted operating margin was essentially the same as the adjustment items in the Water Division were not significant.

Environmental Services

Operating income in the Environmental Services Division amounted to €265.2 million in 2008 compared with €781.8 million in 2007, with adjusted operating income decreasing from €781.8 million in 2007 to €620.2 million in 2008. The main adjustment item in 2008 was a €343 million charge for impairment on goodwill resulting from the deterioration in business performance in Germany in 2008. Adjusted operating income in 2008 was also affected by a €62.6 million charge for impairment on other intangible assets (principally acquired contract rights) in Germany recognized in the opening balance sheet at the time of the acquisition of Veolia Propreté Germany (formerly SULO). Adjusted operating cash flow was €1,331.4 in 2008 compared to €1,427.2 in 2007 a decrease of 6.7% (2.5% at constant exchange rates).

Net charges to operating depreciation and amortization totaled €723.5 million in 2008 compared to €671.2 million in 2007. Net charges to operating provisions totaled €14.6 million in 2008 compared to €24.2 million in 2007.

.Foreign exchange impacts negatively affected the Division’s operating income by €50.5 million, including €34.7 million in respect of the British pound and lesser amounts for the US dollar.

The Division’s overall performance was considerably affected by the economic crisis after September 2008, particularly with a drop in volumes processed for industrial customers and a significant decrease in prices for recyclable materials.

Despite this drop in volumes, performance in the United States and the UK nevertheless remained satisfactory due to a reduction in fixed costs combined with price increases in the United States.



102



Back to Contents


The operating margin fell from 8.6% in 2007 to 2.7% in 2008, due primarily to the impact of impairment charges in Germany. Adjusted operating margin fell from 8.6% to 6.2%, reflecting the relatively lower margins of recently acquired businesses and the economic crisis beginning in September 2008.

Within the Group, the Environmental Services Division is the most sensitive to the current economic crisis. Its exposure to industrial activities is significant in both the non-hazardous (price and volume) and hazardous waste sectors. Recycling activities are particularly sensitive to the price of recyclable materials (paper and ferrous and non-ferrous metals).

Energy Services

Operating income of the Energy Services Division amounted to €434.4 million in 2008 compared with €384.3 million in 2007, an increase of 13.0% at current exchange rates and 10.7% at constant exchange rates. Adjusted operating income of the Energy Services Division was €429.4 million in 2008, an increase of 14.9% compared to €373.8 million recorded in 2007 (at constant exchange rates the increase was 12.5%). The Energy Services Division reported adjusted operating cash flow of €758.8 in 2008 compared to €641.7 in 2007, an increase of 18.2% (16.0% at constant exchange rates).

Net charges to operating depreciation and amortization totaled €222.5 million in 2008 compared to €170.5 million in 2007. Net reversals in operating provisions totaled €13.2 million in 2008 compared to €15.4 million in 2007.

In France, operating performance was positively affected by the increasing prices of energy sources and by improved productivity. Outside France, the increase in operating income also reflected the positive impact of energy prices, particularly in Central Europe, as well as the acquisition of Thermal North America Inc. in the United States, of Praterm in Poland and of other entities in Central Europe, all of which helped attenuate the increase in payroll costs, in particular in Central Europe, and the increased price of gas in the Baltic States. Sales of CO2allowances contributed less to operating income in 2008 than in 2007.

The operating margin was 6.2% in 2007 and 5.8% in 2008, reflecting primarily the impact of increased amortization charges resulting from acquisitions. Adjusted operating margin was 6.0% in 2007 and 5.8% in 2008.

Transportation

The Transportation Division’s operating income amounted to €170.5 million for 2008 compared with €130.6 million for 2007, representing an increase of 30.6% (28.8% at constant exchange rates). Adjusted operating income amounted to €137.0 million in 2008 compared with €115.5 million in 2007, an increase of 18.6% (16.6% at constant exchange rates). The difference reflected two offsetting factors: an impairment charge of €37.7 million relating to the “other European” cash generating unit (which comprises the Netherlands, Belgium), and a gain of €70.2 million, reflecting badwill recorded in the income statement related to the purchase of minority interests in SNCM. The Transportation Division reported adjusted operating cash flow of €287.4 million in 2008 compared to €267.3 million in 2007, an increase of 7.5% (8.6% at con stant exchange rates).

Net charges to operating depreciation and amortization totaled €238.3 million in 2008 compared to €233.3 million in 2007. Net reversals in operating provisions totaled €71.1 million in 2008 compared to €64.7 million in 2007.

Improved productivity, organic growth in the United States and in Eastern Europe and the greater profitability of certain contracts, mainly in the Netherlands, offset the increase in the price of fuel not yet passed on to customers, which had a negative impact of €28 million (including the negative effect of hedging derivatives) on the Division’s operating income, which was also impacted by the end of a favorable French social security regime.

The operating margin remained relatively stable, standing at 2.9% in 2008 and 2.4% in 2007. Adjusted operating margin was 2.3% in 2008 and 2.1% in 2007.

Unallocated Operating Income (loss)

Unallocated operating income (loss) represents primarily items recorded at the holding company level. Our unallocated operating loss increased from €103.3 million in 2007 to €107.8 million in 2008, primarily as a result of measures accompanying business growth and the increased importance of support projects that are implemented jointly among Divisions.



103



Back to Contents


Net Finance costs

Net Finance costs represent the cost of gross financial fair value debt, including profit and loss on related interest rate and exchange rate hedging, less income on cash and cash equivalents. The following table shows a breakdown of the Group’s finance costs, net:

(in € millions)

2008

2007

Income

202.2

151.1

Expense

(1,111.2)

(958.0)

Finance costs, net

(909.0)

(806.9)


The increase in net finance costs reflects:

the increase in average net financial debt from €14,609 million in 2007 to €16,142 million in 2008; and

the increase in the financing rate linked to the increased cost of liquidity, due to available funds being invested in short-term financial assets of limited risk while debt is refinanced based on long-term maturities and in a context of strong interest rate volatility.

The financing rate (defined as the ratio of net finance costs, excluding fair value adjustments to instruments not qualifying for hedge accounting, to average monthly net financial debt for the period) increased from 5.49% in 2007 to 5.61% in 2008. This rate takes into account early settlement of derivative transactions, which management decided to unwind in 2008. Excluding this item,the impact of these derivatives unwinds, the financing rate was 5.78% in 2008, compared to 5.53% in 2007.

Other Financial Income (Expenses)

The following table shows a breakdown of our other financial income (expenses):

(€ million)

2008

2007

Net gains on loans and receivables

43.3

55.6

Net gains and losses on available-for-sale assets (including dividends)

9.3

10.3

Assets and liabilities at fair value through the Income Statement

35.1

5.4

Unwinding of the discount on provisions

(73.3)

(59.4)

Foreign exchange gains and losses

(42.8)

(2.2)

Other income (expenses)

(10.8)

(7.4)

Other financial income and expenses

(39.2)

2.3


Other financial income and expenses decreased from a net financial income of €2.3 million in 2007 to a net financial expense of €39.2 million in 2008.

This decrease mainly reflects:

a decrease of €12.3 million in net gains on loans and receivables, including the absence in 2008 of €26.5 million of interest income on rainwater receivables recognized in 2007 following the resolution of litigation with the Berlin Lander;

an increase of €13.9 million in the unwinding of the discount on provisions, primarily attributable to site restoration provisions in the Environmental Services Division, provisions for pension obligations recognized in accordance with IAS 19 and provisions for onerous contracts;

an increase of €29.7 million in the assets and liabilities at fair value through the Income Statement;

the appreciation of the Euro against certain currencies, resulting in an increase of €40.6 million in foreign exchange losses; and

provisions relating certain risks in respect of our interests in associates.



104



Back to Contents


Income Tax Expense

Our consolidated income tax expenses increasedexpense for 2008 was €462.0 million, compared with €399.7 million for 2007. As a percentage of pre-tax net income from €422.4 millioncontinuing operations (adjusted to €495.8 million, andeliminate our share in the net income of associates), our effective tax rate was 33.34%45.6% for 2008 compared to 24.1% for 2007.

The increase in the income tax expense in 2008 was due to:

the review of the Veolia Propreté Germany business plan, which led to the recognition of an impairment charge of €42 million in respect of deferred tax assets;

the absence of deferred tax assets in certain loss-making subsidiaries, due to insufficient taxable profit forecasts for the coming five years;

a change in tax law governing the deductibility of depreciation and amortization expenses in the United Kingdom (expense of €36 million);

the favorable impact in 2007 of tax rate cuts in Germany and the United Kingdom (income of €54.6 million).

Share of Net Income of Associates


The share of net income offrom associates decreasedincreased from €6.5€17.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2005in 2007 to €6.0€19.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.  This near-stability reflects the first-time equity accounting of Compagnie Méridionale de Navigation (shares of which are held by the SNCM) whose results in 2006 were €5.1 million, as well as provisions of €7.4 million relating to project company shares in the Environmental Services sector in Asia, due to the client’s repudiation of the related agreements.


2008.

Net Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations


Net income (loss) from discontinued operations increased from a net loss of €19.1 million in 2007 to net income of €139.2 million in 2008. The main factor underlying the figure for 2008 was €0.6the €176.5 million fornet gain on the year ended December 31, 2006, compared with €0.7 million for 2005.  Income relating to Southern Water was €52.5 million fordivestiture of Clemessy and Crystal in the year ended December 31, 2006 (including €51.2 million of capital gains from the disposal), compared to €8.4 million for 2005.  The loss relating to the Danish Transportation business was €51.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 (of which €43.9 million was an asset impairment charge), compared to €7.7 million for 2005.Energy Services Division.


Net income for the year attributable to minority interests


Net income for the year attributable to minority interests was €304.1 million in 2008, compared to €326.9 million in 2007. It reflects in particular the minority interests in subsidiaries in the Water Division (€118.9 million), the Environmental Services Division (€18.3 million), the Energy Services Division (€144.8 million) and the Transportation Division (€19.4 million).

NetIn 2007, net income for the year attributable to minority interests totaled €326.9 million and mainly reflected minority interests in subsidiaries in the Water Division (€178.9 million), the Environmental Services Division (€21.8 million), the Energy Services Division (€96.4 million) and the Transportation Division (€28.9 million).

The increase in the share of minority interests in the Energy Services Division in 2008 was due to share attributable to minority interests of the capital gain realized on the divestiture of Clemessy and Crystal, which had an impact of €60 million (the capital gain was recorded in net income from discontinued operations). The significant decrease in net income attributable to minority interests forin the year ended December 31, 2006 was €236.2 million, compared to €172.9 million forWater Division in 2008 reflected the year ended December 31, 2005. This line item reflectedimpact in 2007 of minority interests in the Water segment (€115.7 million),settlement of the Environmental Services segment (€18.6 million), the Energy Services segment (€87.1 million) and the Transportation segment (€14.7 million). The increase between 2005 and 2006 is mainly attributable to developments in international activities of Dalkia in partnership with EDF, the Water segment in Germany (€19.3 million) and the Transportation segment with the consolidation of SNCM (€7.9 million).

Net income attributable to minority interests for the year ended December 31, 2005 was €172.9 million. This line item reflected minority interests in the Water segment (€83.1 million), the Environmental Services segment (€25.7 million), the Energy segment (€54.7 million) and the Transportation segment (€9.7 million).Berlin rainwater receivables matter.



105



Back to contentsContents



Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent


Net income for the year attributable to equity holders of the parent was €758.7€405.1 million in 2006,2008, compared to €622.2€927.9 million in 2005.  The weighted average number of shares outstanding was 393.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 and 390.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. On this basis, net earnings per share attributable to the equity holders was €1.93 in 2006 compared to €1.59 in 2005.

As discussed under “—Presentation of Information in this Section – Non-GAAP Measures,” we use adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent as an important management tool.2007. Adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent was €762.0€687.2 million in 2006,2008, compared to €630.2€935.5 million in 2005.  The following table presents a reconciliation of adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent, to2007.

Adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent for 2005 and 2006.

2006

(€ millions)

Net income

Adjustments

Adjusted net income

Operating income

2,132.9

89.3

2,222.2

Finance costs, net

(701.0)

-

(701.0)

Other financial income and expenses

(34.0)

-

(34.0)

Income tax expense

(409.6)

(86.2)

(495.8)

Share of net income of associates

6.0

-

6.0

Net income from discontinued operations

0.6

(0.6)

-

Minority interests

(236.2)

0.8

(235.4)

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent

758.7

3.3

762.0


2005 adjusted

(€ millions)

Net income

Adjustments

Adjusted net income

Operating income

1,892.9

10.7

1,903.6

Finance costs, net

(710.7)

-

(710.7)

Other financial income and expenses

28.1

-

28.1

Income tax expense

(422.4)

-

(422.4)

Share of net income of associates

6.5

-

6.5

Net income from discontinued operations

0.7

(0.7)

-

Minority interests

(172.9)

(2.0)

(174.9)

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent

622.2

8.0

630.2


In 2006, the principal adjustment item (other than the adjustment to operating income, which is discussed above) was the non-recurring deferred tax credit relating to the tax restructuring of our U.S. operations, which is discussed above.  In 2005, the only significant adjustment item was the adjustment to operating income, which is discussed above.

Year ended December 31, 2005 compared to year ended December 31, 2004

The following discussion compares our results of operations in 2005 with our results of operations in 2004, in each case reflecting the retroactive application of IFRIC 12 accounting for concessions,2008 is determined as well as the treatment of certain businesses as discontinued operations in accordance with IFRS 5 (those businesses are described below under “Net income (loss” from discontinued operations”).follows:





Back to contents

Fiscal year 2008

(€ million)

Adjusted Net
Income

Adjustments

Net Income

Operating income

2,275.0

(314.2)

1,960.8

Net finance costs

(909.0)

-

(909.0)

Other financial income and expenses

(39.2)

-

(39.2)

Income tax expense

(420.1)

(41.9)(1)

(462.0)

Share of net income of associates

19.4

-

19.4

Net loss from discontinued operations

-

139.2

139.2

Minority interests

(238.9)

(65.2)

(304.1)

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent

687.2

(282.1)

405.1

(1)

impairment charge of €41.9 million in respect of deferred tax assets following the review of the Veolia Propreté Germany business plan


Adjusted net income for the year ended December 31, 2007 is determined as follows:

Fiscal year 2007

(€ million)

Adjusted Net
Income

Adjustments

Net Income

Operating income

2,433.5

27.6

2,461.1

Net finance costs

(806.9)

-

(806.9)

Other financial income and expenses

6.9

(4.6)

2.3

Income tax expense

(410.7)

11.0

(399.7)

Share of net income of associates

17.1

-

17.1

Net income from discontinued operations

-

(19.1)

(19.1)

Minority interests

(304.4)

(22.5)

(326.6)

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent

935.5

(7.6)

927.9


Revenue

Overview

We generated revenueGiven the weighted average number of €25,570.4shares outstanding of 462.2 million in 2005, an increase of 12.2% from revenue of €22,792.42008 and 434.8 million in 2004. Positive currency effects of €180.9 million resulted from appreciation in2007 (adjusted for the currencies of certain Eastern European countries (€89.2 million), the U.S. dollar (€13.9 million) and certain Asian currencies. Organic growth was 9.2%. Revenue from outside France amounted to €13,131.2 million, or 51.4% of total revenue.

The following table shows a breakdown of our revenue:

2005 adjusted

(in € millions)

2004 adjusted

(in € millions)

% change 2005/2004

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

25,570.4

22,792.4

12.2%

9.2%

2.2%

0.8%


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenue by division:


(in € millions, except for %)

2005 adjusted

2004 adjusted

% change 2005/2004

Water

9,134.2

7,976.9

14.5%

Environmental Services

6,748.7

6,380.6

5.8%

Energy Services

5,463.6

4,974.9

9.8%

Transportation

4,223.9

3,460.0

22.1%

Total revenue

25,570.4

22,792.4

12.2%

Total revenue at constant 2004 exchange rate

25,389,5

22,792,4

11.4%


Water


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenue within the water division:


2005 adjusted

(in € millions)

2004 adjusted

(in € millions)

% change 2005/2004

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

9,134.2

7,976.9

14.5%

10.9%

2.8%

0.8%


Our water network building and renovation business generated revenue of €9.1 billion in 2005, an increase of 14.5% compared with 2004.  Organic growth was 10.9%, which is primarily attributable to the following:


·

In France, the distribution business performed well, despite slightly lower volumes, and the works business continued to grow. As a result, organic growth in revenue totaled 4.5%.


·

Outside France, excluding Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies, revenue was up strongly (19.7% at constant scope and exchange rates). In Europe, strong revenue growth (28.4% at constant exchange rates) was driven by the Braunschweig contract in Germany, other new contracts signed in the last few months of 2005, in particular in the Czech Republic, as well as a five-year contract extension in the United Kingdom. In North America, revenue advanced by more than 8.3% at constant exchange rates, due to favorable revenue levels in general and the commencement of operations under a contract in Indianapolis. In the Asia-Pacific region, the start-up of the Shenzhen, Qingdao, Lugouqiao, Baoji and other contracts in China and the services business in Japan resulted in revenue growth of more than 25%.


·

The commencement of operationsunder several large construction and engineering contracts in France and abroad, plus the acquisition of companies in Germany and the United Kingdom, enabled Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies to record growth in revenue of nearly 24% (+8.8% at constant scope and exchange rates).


Our water division recorded external growth of 2.8% during 2005, which was due to several factors. We made acquisitions in the engineering sector in Germany at the end of 2004 and in the United Kingdom in the third quarter of 2005, while also increasing our stake in certain Italian water companies in the second quarter of 2005.





Back to contents



Environmental Services


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenue within the Environmental Services (waste management) division:


2005 adjusted

(in € millions)

2004 adjusted

(in € millions)

% change
2005/2004

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

6,748.7

6,380.6

5.8%

4.9%

0.1%

0.8%


Our Environmental Services (waste management) division generated revenue of €6.7 billion in 2005, an increase of 5.8% compared with 2004. Organic growth was 4.9%, which is primarily attributable to the following:


·

In France, organic growth in revenue totaled 3.5%. This growth was achieved despite a relatively unfavorable economic context, which put pressure on the industrial non-hazardous waste segment.


·

Outside France, organic growth accelerated and reached 6.1%. Large integrated contracts began to contribute greater revenues, tonnage collection increased in the United Kingdom and growth was strong in the Asia-Pacific region in particular (18.9%). In North America, new contracts were signed, toxic waste volumes were elevated and revenue was high in industrial services, leading to  revenue growth of 8.5% at constant exchange rates.


Energy Services


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenue within the energy services division:


2005 adjusted

(in € millions)

2004 adjusted

(in € millions)

% change
2005/2004

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

5,463.6

4,974.9

9.8%

8.9%

-

0.9%


Our energy services division generated revenue of €5.5 billion in 2005, an increase of 9.8% compared with 2004.  Organic growth was 8.9%, which is primarily attributable to the following:


·

In France, revenue was up 7.6% organically and continued to benefit from theshare capital increase in energy prices in thermal services.


·

Outside France, revenue increased by 14.6% (organic growth of 11.0%). Growth was especially high in Central Europe (increase of 37.8%)July 2007 and June 2009), driven, in particular, by the full impact of new contracts in Poland (in particular Poznan and start-up at Lodz), Hungary and Romania. In Southern Europe (Spain, Italy) revenue grew by 14.9% (organic growth of 8.3%).


We worked on strengthening our business portfolio by disposing of certain assets, resulting in no net external growth. We expanded in Spain, but sold the nuclear industry construction business of our specialized French subsidiaries. We also sold our German facilities management business.

Transportation


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenue within the transportation division:


2005 adjusted

(in € millions)

2004 adjusted

(in € millions)

% change 2005/2004

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

4,223.9

3,460.0

22.0%

13.0%

8.2%

0.8%




Back to contents



Our transportation division generated revenue of €4.2 billion in 2005, a 22.0% increase compared with 2004. Organic growth was 13.0%, which is primarily attributable to the following:


·

In France, passenger transportation revenues increased strongly by 18.0%, due in particular to the full impact of urban transit contracts renewed in 2004 as well as the impact of the contract in Toulouse, which was awarded for 2005.


·

Outside France, passenger transportation revenues grew by 24.6%, due in particular to the full impact of the Melbourne contract and new operations in the United States (Denver, Metrolink contract) and Europe (Dublin tramway, Helsinki bus contract).


Separately, the freight transportation business recorded growth in revenues of 26.8%, amounting to €151.7 million in 2005.


External growth (8.2%) was due in particular to the acquisition of ATC in the United States in September 2005.


Revenue by geographical region


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenue by geographical region:


(in € millions, except %)

2005 adjusted

2004 adjusted

% change 2005/2004

France

12,439.2

11,607.4

7.2%

United Kingdom

1,727,1

1,629.2

6.0%

Germany

1,817.3

1,341.3

35.5%

Other European countries

4,708.6

4,131.4

14.0%

United States

2,183.3

1,883.2

15.9%

Oceania

878.0

644,0

36.3%

Asia

597.3

505,6

18.1%

Rest of the world

1,219.6

1 050.3

16.1%

Total revenue

25,570.4

22,792.4

12.2%


France


The increase in revenue in France was driven primarily by an increase at our transportation division, which recorded strong organic growth of 15.3%. This increase was in turn primarily related to growth in the urban transportation business, where revenue strongly increased on an organic basis by 34.1% in 2005.


United Kingdom


The increase in revenue in the United Kingdom was due in particular to growth in our water division, which benefited from the impact of a five-year contract extension, as well as growth in our waste management division, which recorded higher revenues from integrated service contracts.


Germany


The increase in revenue in Germany was mostly due to the integration of the Braunschweig water contract, which generated revenue of €349.6 million in 2005.


Other European countries


The contribution to revenues from Central and Eastern Europe rose significantly, in particular in our water division in the Czech Republic and in our energy services division in Poland, where we acquired the company that holds the Lodz contract. In addition, the Poznan contract contributed for the full year in 2005.





Back to contents



United States


Apart from favorable currency fluctuations, the increase in revenue in the United States was primarily due to an increase in revenues recorded in our waste management division and our transportation division.  Revenue in our waste management division increased at year-end in particular, while revenue in our transportation division increased due to the acquisition of ATC, which generated €74.8 million in revenue over four months in 2005.


Oceania


Apart from favorable currency fluctuations of €34.5 million, the increase in revenue was due mainly to increased contributions from our transportation division and waste management division in Australia. The transportation division benefited from the full impact of the Melbourne and Auckland contracts, while the waste management division recorded strong growth in industrial services and landfilling.


Asia


The increase in revenue in Asia was due primarily to growth in our water division, which recorded organic growth of 9.9%. The Shenzhen contract went into production, generating €35 million in revenue in 2005, and operations commenced under several other Chinese contracts signed in 2003 and 2004. In South Korea, revenue declined by €23 million due to completion of construction of installations relating to the Incheon contract, which was only partially offset by the €10 million increase generated by the start-up of the Mansu and Songdo plants.


Rest of the world


There was a favorable currency effect in South America of €18.1 million. This principally affected Proactiva, which manages water and waste management contracts in the region. In Israel, our energy services division acquired Kalorit Israel, which generated €14.7 million in revenue from ordinary activities in 2005.


Operating Income


Overview


Our operating income increased by 27.1%, from €1,489.6 million in 2004 to €1,892.9 million in 2005.  The principal reasons for the increase was growth in our revenues,  an improvement in margins that reflected the impact of our “Veolia Environnement 2005” efficiency plan (which resulted in selling, general and administrative expenses declining from 11.7% of our revenues in 2004 to 11.3% in 2005), and a number of other items described in the next paragraph.  Our operating income represented 6.5% of revenues in 2004 and 7.4% in 2005.   


The change in operating income was also impacted by items we record as “other operating revenue and expenses,” which by their nature can be subject to significant fluctuations.  Other operating revenue and expenses reflected the realization of €57.9 million of capital gains on asset sales (primarily PCP Holding and Acque Potabilite in 2005), compared to capital losses of €102.1 million in 2004 (primarily Berlikomm). This net increase was partially offset by a decline of €72.2 million in other components of “other operating  revenue and expense,” the most significant component of which reflected the impact of writing down goodwill in connection with the sale of a unit of the Energy Services division.  Our goodwill impairment charges included in operating income declined from €71.9 million in 2004 (primarily relating to our Scandanavian transport business) to €28.0 millio n in 2005 (of which €20.8 million related to divested businesses in the Energy Services division).  In addition, our restructuring costs were €30.6 million lower in 2005 (€16.2 million) than in 2004 (€46.8 million).  


Operating income grew significantly in each of our divisions.  The following table shows a breakdown of our operating income by division:


(in € millions, except %)

2005 adjusted

2004 adjusted

% change

2005/2004

Water

1,002.3

798.6

25.5%

Environmental Services

543.6

480.6

13.1%

Energy Services

315.3

239.6

31.6%

Transportation

116.8

38.9

200.3%

Holding companies

(85.1)

(68.1)

(25.0)%

Total

1,892.9

1,489.6

27.1%

Total at constant 2004 exchange rate

1,867.6

1,489.6

25.4%






Back to contents



Water


The operating income of our water division amounted to €1,002.3 million in 2005, a 25.5% increase from the €798.6 million recorded in 2004. In 2004, operating income was negatively affected by a €55.2 million loss relating to the sale of Berlikomm.

In France, the program to improve operating performance continued to be implemented, and the distribution and construction businesses performed well, boosting operating income.

In the rest of Europe, the rise in operating income was largely due to the integration of the Braunschweig contract. In addition, contracts were renewed in the United Kingdom, there were positive developments in the Czech Republic and Italy, and the BOT contracts in Brussels and The Hague delivered their first positive contributions. In Asia-Pacific, operating income improved due to the commencement of operations in China and South Korea. Finally, engineering and technology solutions took another step toward recovery after refocusing on profitable activities.


Environmental Services


The operating income of our Environmental Services (waste management) division increased by 13.1%, from €480.6 million in 2004 to €543.6 million in 2005.

In France, the increase in operating income was primarily the result of action plans initiated in previous years, in particular with respect to waste collection and landfills. In the rest of Europe, operating income increased primarily because integrated contracts posted strong growth and, more generally, as a result of strong performance in the waste collection business and increased tonnage amounts in UK landfills. In the United States, the profitability of toxic waste, industrial services and  solid waste activities increased.


Energy Services


The operating income of our energy services division increased by 31.6%, from €239.6 million in 2004 to €315.3 million in 2005. In 2004, operating income was negatively affected by a €13.8 million payment to settle a dispute in Italy, while in 2005 the operating income of the Energy Services division was negatively impacted by the impairment charges described above.  See Note 25 to our consolidated financial statements for further information relating to these impairment losses.


In France, the profitability of thermal services in the areas of installation and services improved. Operating income was also enhanced by proceeds from the sale of greenhouse gas emission rights. Given the overall balanced nature of the contract portfolio, the rise in energy prices during 2005 had no net effect on profitability. Rising gas prices have caused the selling prices of electricity produced through co-generation to reach their ceiling. Legislative changes at the end of 2005 limited this phenomenon, and the opportunity loss was offset by an upturn in energy management margins on other contracts. In the rest of Europe, the rise in operating income resulted directly from new contracts in Central Europe (Lodz and Poznan). This region was only marginally exposed to the rise in fuel prices in 2005, given the energy sources used. Finally, measures to improve energy efficiency were successful in the various regions where this divisio n operates.


Transportation


The operating income of our transportation division increased substantially, from €38.9 million in 2004 to €116.8 million in 2005. Excluding impairment losses on Scandinavian goodwill in 2004, operating income increased by 7.3% (5.9% at constant exchange rates). This result was achieved despite the negative impact of the rise in fuel prices, which totaled €17 million outside France. Price increases outside of France could not be fully passed on to the customer.


In France, operating income increased in both the urban and inter-city transportation segments. Outside France, the Scandinavian business posted recovery in line with a profit improvement plan. In other regions, operating income in the transportation division benefited from new contracts and increased in accordance with  business plans.





Back to contents



Finance costs, net


Finance costs, net, decreased from €741.1 million in 2004 to €710.7 million in 2005.  The following table shows a breakdown of our finance costs, net:


(in € millions)

2005 adjusted

2004 adjusted

   

Income

63.3

91.8

Expense

(774.0)

(832.9)

Total finance costs, net

(710.7)

(741.1)


The financing rate was 5.07% in 2005, compared to 5.1% in 2004. This slight decrease in the financing rate mainly reflects the appreciation of several currencies against the euro and in particular the U.S. dollar, and the cost of extending the maturity of borrowings. In addition, net finance costs in 2005 include €26.0 million related to our partial early redemption (in the amount of €1,150 million) of bonds due to mature in June 2008. This early redemption was conducted in order to optimize the maturity and future cost of borrowings. In addition, fair value movements on derivative instruments not qualifying for hedge accounting totaled  a gain of €12.0 million, compared to €7.6 million in 2004. These movements, which are calculated in accordance with IAS 39, are highly volatile in nature.


Other Financial Income (Expenses)


The following table shows a breakdown of our other financial income (expenses):

(in € millions)

2005 adjusted

2004 adjusted

Loan income

37.0

55.4

Dividends

6.5

5.9

Foreign exchange gains (losses)

14.3

(13.9)

Financial provisions

24.2

-

Other income (expenses)

(53.9)

(3.0)

Total

28.1

44.4


We recorded net other financial income of €28.1 million in 2005, compared to €44.4 million in 2004.  In 2004, other financial income included a capital gain realized on the sale of Vinci shares of €44.4 million. Excluding this capital gain, other financial income (expenses) increased by €28.1 million in 2004, mainly due to foreign exchange gains.  


In 2005:


·

loan income and dividends fell to €43.5 million;

·

foreign exchange gains totaled €14.3 million;

·

the reverse discounting of site restoration provisions had a negative impact of €15.7 million; and

·

the revaluation of embedded derivatives had an impact of -€2.5 million.


In 2004, other financial income (expenses) was affected by a capital gain of €44.4 million realized on the sale of Vinci shares by the energy services division, foreign exchange losses of €13.9 million, the revaluation of embedded derivatives (negative impact of €12.9 million), loan income and dividends of €61.3 million, and the reverse discounting of site restoration provisions (negative impace of €10.8 million).


Income Tax Expense


Our income tax expense totaled €422.4 million in 2005, compared to €174.9 million in 2004.  Our 2005 income tax expense consisted of €309.4 million in current income taxes and €113.5 million in deferred income taxes, compared to €225.1 million in current income taxes and a deferred income tax benefit of €50.2 million in 2004.


The increase in income tax in 2005 was primarily due to an increase in operating income. In addition, in 2004 the prospect of future profits prompted us to capitalize additional tax-loss carry forwards, limiting deferred tax expense for that year.





Back to contents



Share of Net Income of Associates


Ourbasic earnings per share of net income of associates decreased from €22 million in 2004 to €14.9 million in 2005, following the transfer of certain investments in associates to non-consolidated investments. The largest net income shares in 2005 were generated by water segment associates (€10.8 million).


Net Income (loss) from Discontinued Operations


In 2005, income from discontinued operations related to Danish transportation activities and to Southern Water net income. In 2004, discontinued operations generated a loss of €38.1 million. This loss broke down as follows: a €162.2 million loss from U.S. water businesses, a €132.7 million gain from FCC and a €13.1 million loss from UKand Danish transportation activities and profit from Southern Water.


Minority Interests


Our net income attributable to minority interests in 2005 was €172.9 million, compared to €212.1 in 2004. The principal minority interests in 2005 are related to our water division (€83.0 million), our waste management division (€25.8 million), our energy services division (€54.7 million) and our transportation division (€97 million). The decrease in net income attributable to minority interests in 2005 compared to 2004 is primarily attributable to our water division following the consolidation of the Braunschweig contract (€9.8 million), and the improvement in the results of the Berlin water companies (€31.7 million), the 2004 results of which were affected by the capital loss generated by the sale of Berlikomm and by the contribution of FCC for €78.8 million which was disposed at the end of 2004.

Net income attributable to minority interests in 2004 was €212.1 The principal minority interests in 2004 were related to our water division (€47.6 million, mainly related to Berlin water companies), our energy services division (€50.7 million), our waste management division (€21.6 million) and our transportation division (€13.6 million) and FCC for €77.8 million.


Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent


Net income were €0.88 in 2008, compared to €2.13 in 2007 (adjusted for the share capital increase in July 2007 and June 2009) and diluted earnings per share attributable to equity holders of the parent was €622..2 millionwere €0.87 in 2005,2008, compared to €389.8 million€2.11 in 2004. The increase2007. Basic adjusted net income per share was primarily due€1.49 in 2008, compared to €2.15 in 2007 (adjusted for the share capital increase in operatingJuly 2007 and June 2009). Diluted adjusted net income and control over financial interest expense during 2005.


The weighted average number of shares outstanding was 390.4 million on December 31, 2005 and 396.2 million on December 31, 2004. On this basis, net earnings per share attributable to the equity holders of parent was €159€1.48 in 20052008, compared to €0.98€2.13 in 2004.2007 (adjusted for the share capital increase in July 2007 and June 2009).



106



Back to contentsContents



LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our operations generate significant cash flow. In 2006,2009, we significantly reduced our operatingfinancial debt between December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2009, mainly as result of the impact of financial and industrial disposals during the period on our capacity to repay debt. In 2009, our cash flow from operating activities (including the impact of changes in working capital) was more than sufficient to cover our investment requirements.  We also have access to sources of liquidity that include bank financing, international bond marketsinvesting requirements, interest payments and international equity markets.income tax payments. We believe that our working capital is sufficient for our present requirements.

Cash Flows

OperatingThe following table sets forth information relating to our consolidated cash flow before changes in working capitalflows for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009.

(€ million)

Year ended
December 31, 2009

Year ended
December 31, 2008

Operating cash flow before changes in working capital and income taxes paid

3,939

4,178

Changes in working capital

432

(81)

Income taxes paid

(408)

(347)

Net cash from operating activities

3,963

3,750

Net cash from/(used in) investing activities

(1,662)

(3,335)

Net increase/(decrease) in current borrowings

(1,324)

(1,437)

New non-current borrowings and other debt

3,301

3,590

Principal payments on non-current borrowings and other debt

(1,515)

(185)

Issue of share capital by the non-controlling interests

157

(80)

Other share capital changes

5

3

Dividends paid

(434)

(754)

Interest paid

(730)

(847)

Net cash from/(used in) financing activities

(540)

290


Net cash from operating activities increased by 8.5%, from €3,541.9€3,750 million in 20052008 to €3,844.4€3,963 million in 2006. Excluding2009, reflecting the cash flow of discontinued operationsfollowing:

A decrease in 2005 (cash generation of €4.3 million) and in 2006 (use of cash of €8.0 million), operating cash flow before changes in working capital increasedand income taxes paid, from €4,178 million in 2008, to €3,939 million in 2009, which we discuss below.

Changes in working capital were €432 million in 2009 compared to €(81) million in 2008. The increase in working capital requirements was due to targeted action plans for trade receivables in certain countries; the reduction in activity or prices mainly in the Environmental Services and Energy Services Divisions; and temporary factors mainly relating to a delay in the collection of fees and taxes by 8.9%, reflectingclients (we collect fees and taxes on behalf of certain clients, and remit the relevant amounts to the public authority at times determined by them, which vary from year to year).

Income tax payments in 2009 were €408 million, compared to €347 million in 2008.

The large majority of our improved operating performance. The definition of operating cash flow before changes in working capital recommendedand income taxes paid reflects the cash flows produced by theConseil national de la comptabilité (French Accounting standard setter) excludes the impactordinary operations in our Divisions and our holding company activities. This constitutes our “adjusted operating cash flow,” which we use as a performance indicator and analyze under “—Results of financing activitiesOperations—Year ended December 31, 2009 compared to year ended December 31, 2008 – Operating Income.” The remainder reflects financial operating cash flow (meaning cash flow related to items recorded in our income statement as “other financial income and taxation.

Netexpenses,” consisting primarily of foreign exchange gains and losses), as well as operating cash flow from operating activities improved from €3,163.7 million in 2005discontinued operations.



107



Back to €3,389.6 million in 2006. This increase is principally due to the improvementContents


The decrease in operating cash flow before changes in working capital.  The slight increasecapital and income taxes paid in working capital requirements during 2006 (€111.8 million)2009 reflected primarily the decrease in adjusted operating cash flow, which was the result€3,955.8 million in 2009 compared to €4,105.4 million in 2008. See “—Results of growthOperations—Year ended December 31, 2009 compared to year ended December 31, 2008 – Operating Income.” Financial operating cash flow was a net outflow of €3.0 million in the Company’s business.2009 compared to a net inflow of €22.8 million in 2008. Discontinued operations resulted in a net operating cash outflow of €14.2 million in 2009, compared to a net inflow of €50.2 million in 2008.

Net cash used in investing activities totaled €2,904.0 was €1,662 million in 2006,2009, compared to €2,407.6€3,335 million in 2005. The €496.4 million increase in net cash used in 20062008. This decrease was mainly due to a decrease in financial investments, linked to the €738 million investment (netslowdown in external growth in 2009, as a result of acquired cash)the adaptation of the Group to the economic crisis. In addition, in Cleanaway2009 we increased our disposals (industrial and financial), as described in the United Kingdom.more detail below under “—Divestitures and Disposals of Assets.” Industrial capital expenditures decreased significantly in 2009, as described in more detail below under “—Investing Activities.”

Net cash used in financing activities were €3,152.8 was €540 million in 20052009 as compared to net cash received from financing activities in 2008 of €290 million. As described in further detail below under “Financing Activities”, we made significant principal payments on non-current borrowings and €71.5 millionother debts compared to 2008. On the other hand, dividends paid in 2006.  We recorded a decreasecash in interest2009 (58% of the dividends were paid from €738.8 million in 2005shares) decreased compared with 2008. Issue of share capital to €596.4 millionthe minority shareholders (which we refer to as “non-controlling interests” pursuant to IFRS) increased in 2006.  2009 compared with 2008.

Investing Activities

In addition to cash flow relating to investing activities, we receivedmonitor our net investments on an enterprise value basis, which permits us to analyze our investments by taking into account the debt and cash of the entities in which we invest (we analyze this debt and cash as part of our consolidated net financial debt, as described under “– Financial Debt Structure” below). We also include investments made under finance lease arrangements, as well as the portion attributable to non-controlling interests of loans that we make to entities that we control. In addition, for purposes of our analysis of net investments, when non-controlling interests subscribe for new shares in entities that we control, we consider the subscription as the equivalent of a disposal (the amount of the subscription is recorded in our consolidated cash flow statement as net cash from new borrowings that exceeded our principal payments in 2006, and we also received €246.5 million in proceeds from the issue of shares, primarily in connection with our employee share purchase plan.  We increased dividend payments from €374.0 million in 2005 to €479.2 million in 2006.  

In 2005:

·

€1,535 million was paid to redeem outstanding convertible bonds (known by their French acronym as OCEANEs);

·

€500 million was paid to redeem outstanding euro-medium term notes in  November 2005;

·

borrowings to finance sales of receivables declined by €547 million;

·

€1,150 million was paid to partially redeem a bond issue maturing in 2008;

·

€300 million was paid to redeem subordinated notes redeemable in shares (TSARs)financing act ivities).


As a result, Net investment” includes capital expenditure net of industrial asset disposals (purchases of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment net of disposals), financial investment net of financial disposals (purchases of financial assets net of disposals, adding or subtracting (as applicable) the cash flows described abovenet debt of companies entering or leaving the scope of consolidation), new operating financial assets, principal payments on operating financial assets and the effectsshare capital increases subscribed by non-controlling interests.

The following table sets forth the calculation of exchange rates and other movements resulting in aour net cash outflow of €41.4 million, cash and cash equivalents totaled €2,202.0 million atinvestments for the years ended December 31, 2006, compared to €1,829.3 million at December 31, 2005.2008 and 2009.

(€ million)

Year ended
December 31, 2009

Year ended
December 31, 2008

Net cash flow from / (used in) investing activities in the cash flow statement

(1,662)

(3,335)

New operating financial assets (investments under finance leases)

(17)

(22)

Capital expenditures net of grants (investments under finance leases)

(27)

(113)

Net financial debt of entities acquired

(151)

(479)

Net cash of entities divested

312

71

Dividends received from associates

(15)

(16)

Increase / (decrease) in receivables and other financial assets*

(163)

312

Net investments calculated on an enterprise value basis (before issuance of share capital to non-controlling interests)

(1,723)

(3,582)

Issue of share capital to non-controlling interests**

138

27

Total net investments

(1,585)

(3,555)


*

 In 2009 and 2008, this reflects primarily the share attributable to non-controlling interests in loans to Dalkia International and its subsidiaries and advance payments to suppliers in respect of trains in our Transporation Division.

**

In 2008, the issue of share capital to non-controlling interests does not include the impact of a capital reduction of €131 million in the Berlin activities of the Water Division, which represented a pro rata distribution to our Company and other shareholders, which used their share to pay other receivables owed to us.



Sources of Funds

Financings

As of December 31, 2006, Moody’s and Standard & Poor's rated the Company as follows:108


Short-term

Long term

Outlook

Recent events

Moody’s

P-2

A3

Stable

Moody’s confirmed its rating of Veolia Environnement given on July 10, 2006.

Standard and Poor’s(1)

A-2

BBB+

Stable

Standard & Poor’s confirmed, in October 2006, its ratings on Veolia Environnement on October 3, 2005.



(1)The EMTN program is rated BBB by S&P.


In 2006, Veolia Environnement pursued an active refinancing policy aimed at strengthening its financial condition and extending its debt maturities.




Back to contentsContents



The principal debt items that matured in 2006 and that were either repaid or refinanced were as follows:

·

Optional credit line of €150 million with Natixis (renewable every year for 4 years), which can be put in place at any time by Veolia Environnement until November 29, 2007.

·

EMTN (series 3) for €20 million expiring August 23, 2006 was repaid in full at the date of expiration.


All of the 2006 financing transactions, both on the capital markets and with banks, were intended to optimize the Company’s debt profile with an emphasis on:  achieving a better match between assets and liabilities, extending the average maturity of long-term debt, smoothing out the debt repayment schedule, diversifying financing sources and taking best advantage of market conditions.

Our main financing activities in 2006 were as follows:

·

FRN €150 million private placement from January 18, 2006 to July 18, 2007 – EURIBOR 3M coupon.

·

FRN €300 million private placement from February 15, 2006 to February 15, 2008 – EURIBOR 3M +0.06% coupon.

·

EMTN €1,000 million from November 24, 2006 until January 16, 2017 – 4.375% fixed rate coupon.


Our principal refinancing activities in bank debt were as follows in 2006:

·

New bilateral line of credit of €100 million with CALYON from January 2, 2006 to January 4, 2010.


The syndicated credit documentation and credit lines contain no financial ratio covenants (although in some cases they limit the proportion of our group’s debt that may be incurred by subsidiaries, rather than by our company).  We have outstanding privately placed notes in the amount of €309 million that require compliance with the following covenants at December 31 of each year:

·

ICR (Interest Coverage Ratio) > 3.2 and

·

DPR (Debt Payout Ratio) < 5.3.

The Interest Coverage Ratio in respect of any given date is the ratio of adjusted cash flow (generally cash flow from operations plus certain cash flow from IFRIC 4 loans) for the twelve-month period then ended to cost of financing for such period.  The Debt Payout Ratio in respect of any given date is the ratio of adjusted net debt (generally, financial debt less cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities, and plus or minus fair value adjustments in respect of derivative instruments) at such date to adjusted cash flow for the twelve month period then ended.

These ratios were defined based on IFRS accounts prior to application of IFRIC 12 and will be updated to take account of IFRIC 12. As of December 31, 2006, we were in compliance with these covenants.  If we fail to meet these covenants, the noteholders could require us to repay these notes in full.

In addition, substantially all of our debt agreements contain standard restrictions, such as negative pledge clauses that limit our ability to pledge our assets to secure our debt, as well as events of default in case of non-payment, failure to comply with covenants, acceleration of other debts in amounts exceeding specified thresholds, and other customary circumstances.

As of December 31, 2006, net financial debt broke down as follows:


(€ millions)

December 31, 2006

December 31, 2005 (adjusted)

Long-term borrowings

14,001.6

13,722.8

Short-term borrowings

2,904.1

2,138.2

Bank overdrafts

456.0

506.8

Sub-total, financial debt

17,361.7

16,367.8

Cash and cash equivalents

-2,658.0

-2,336.1

Less fair value on hedging instruments

-28.8

-161.1

Net financial debt

14,674.9

13,870.6






Back to contents



The table below shows the Company’s maturity schedule for long-term borrowings, as of December 31, 2006:


 

Total

Payments due by period

(€ millions)

 

2 years

3-5 years   

> 5 years   

Bank loans

5,584.1

1,622.9

1,653.8

2,307.4

Bonds

8,417.5

1,059.3

128.7

7,229.5

Total

14,001.6

2,682.2

1,782.5

9,536.9


Divestitures and Disposals of Assets

Asset divestitures totaled €354.9 million in 2006, and €348.0 million net of the cash of companies sold.

Financial divestitures in 2006, which totaled €213.6 million excluding cash of companies sold, included the following items:

·

shares of Southern Water for €89.6 million.

·

a 34% stake of the company which holds the Lodz contract in Poland in the Energy segment at IFM for €70 million.

·

a 35% stake in Osilub (Veolia Waste Management France) for €4.2 million.

·

the company Connex Transport UK to Bombardier for €8.9 million.


Cash related to financial divestitures totaled negative €6.9 million.

The principal industrial divestitures in 2006, which totaled €141.3 million, included the following items:

·

The disposal of assets in New Zealand in Environmental Services for €43.5 million

·

The disposal of vehicles in Denmark within the Transportation segment for €18.9 million.

·

other industrial assets with individual values of less than €10 million and essentially representing rotation of operating assets.


Capital Expenditures

The following table shows athe breakdown of our capital expendituresinvesting activities during 20052009 and 2006:2008 by operating segments:

(€ millions)

Industrial investments (1)

Financial investments (2)

New operating financial assets

2006

2005

(adjusted)

2006

2005

(adjusted)

2006

2005

(adjusted)

      

Total net investments by Operating segments

(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2009

Year ended December 31,2008

Water

853

771

214

614

262

307

684

1,208

Environmental Services

692

639

875

105

20

100

227

1,323

Energy Services

318

252

102

204

63

96

454

586

Transportation

302

193

253

175

16

10

158

353

Other

32

29

8

1

-

-

Total

2,197

1,884

1,452

1,099

361

513

(2)

Including those financed through capital leases.

(2)

Excluding cash and cash equivalents of acquired companies.

Others

62

85

Net investments by Operating segments

1,585

3,555


Our total net investments of €1,585 million in 2009 compared to €3,555 million in 2008 are broken down as follows by segment and by type of investment:

Year ended December 31, 2009

(in € million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy
Services

Transportation

Other

Total

Industrial investments

835

626

531

445

56

2,493

Financial investments

160

9

99

62

8

338

New operating financial assets

279

74

121

26

0

500

Total Gross Investments

1,274

709

751

533

64

3,331

Industrial divestitures

(45)

(40)

(14)

(158)

(2)

(259)

Financial divestitures

(244)

(366)

(121)

(163)

-

(894)

Principal payments on operating financial assets

(204)

(71)

(150)

(30)

-

(455)

Issue of share capital to non-controlling interests

(97)

(5)

(12)

(24)

-

(138)

Total Net Investments

684

227

454

158

62

1,585


Year ended December 31, 2008

(in € million)

Water

Environmental
Services

Energy
Services

Transportation

Other

Total

Industrial investments

950

990

539

342

72

2,893

Financial investments

332

389

324

218

17

1,280

New operating financial assets

332

55

133

11

(2)

529

Total Gross Investments

1,614

1,434

996

571

87

4,702

Industrial divestitures

(70)

(45)

(14)

(201)

-

(330)

Financial divestitures

(164)

(17)

(248)

(1)

(2)

(432)

Principal payments on operating financial assets

(161)

(48)

(133)

(16)

-

(358)

Issue of share capital to non-controlling interests

(11)

(1)

(15)

0

-

(27)

Total Net Investments

1,208

1,323

586

353

85

3,555




109



Back to contentsContents



Industrial Investments

Given the economic context, we adopted a restrictive investment policy substantially reducing financial investments, but without putting into question capital expenditure of a contractual nature or necessary for industrial activities. The decline primarily involves Environmental Services. Industrial investments excluding investments through capital leases, totaled €2,018amounted to €2,493 million in 2006,2009, compared to €1,837.0€2,893 million in 2005, representing an increase of 10%.  Industrial investments including those financed through capital leases totaled €2,197 million2008 and brokebreak down as follows:

·

Water: €853€835 million an increasein the Water Division (down 12.1% compared to 2008), including €336 million in growth investments and €499 million in maintenance-related investments (€538 million in 2008). Growth investments in 2009 mainly concerned concession assets in France, China and Morocco.

€626 million in the Environmental Services Division (down 36.8% compared to 2008), including €130 million in growth investments and €496 million in maintenance-related investments (€745 million in 2008). The decrease in capital expenditure was due to the adaptation of 10.6% from 2005,the Environmental Services Division to the economic crisis.

€531 million in the Energy Services Division (down 1.5% compared to 2008), including €296 million in growth investments and €235 million in maintenance-related investments (€278 million in 2008).

€445 million in the Transportation Division (up 30.1% compared to 2008), including €68 million in growth investments and €377 million in maintenance-related investments (€294 million in 2008).

Maintenance-related investments totaled €1,632 million in 2009 (4.7% of which €355total revenue), compared to €1,860 million were for growth-related spending and €498 million were for maintenance spending.

·

Environmental Services: €692 million, an increasein 2008 (5.2% of 8.3% from 2005, of which €173 million were for growth-related spending and €519 million were for maintenance spending.

·

Energy Services: €318 million, an increase of 26.2% from 2005, of which €118 million were for growth-related spending and €200 million were for maintenance spending.

·

Transportation: €302 million, an increase of 56.5% from 2005, of which €123 million were for growth-related spending and €179 million were for maintenance spending. These investments exclude the call option concerning the acquisition in 2007 of a boat for €112 million.

The increase in maintenance spending resulted principally from the increase in business and the scope of consolidation.  total revenue).

Financial Investments

Financial investments including net cash of acquired companies of €161totaled €338 million in 2006, totaled €1,2912009, compared to €1,280 million in 2006, compared to €994 million in 2005.

In 2005,2008. The main financial investments included the acquisition of the company which holds the Braunschweig contract by Veolia Eau for €374 million, of the company which holds the Lodz contract in Poland by Veolia Énergie for €171 million and of ATC Vancom in the United States for €77 million by Veolia Transport.

Financial investments in 2006 (excluding cash of acquired companies) totaled €1,452 million and broke down as follows:

·

Water: €214 million, compared to €614 million in 2005. The principal financial investments in 2006 related to the acquisition of Banska Bystrica and Poprad in Slovakia for €53 million and €18 million respectively and the acquired contracts of Kunming and Liuzhou in China for €44 million and €16 million, respectively.

·

Environmental Services: €875 million, compared to €105 million in 2005. The principal financial investments in 2006 related to the acquisition of Cleanaway in the United Kingdom for €745 million and of Biffa in Belgium for €63 million.

·

Energy Services: €102 million, compared to €204 million in 2005. The principal financial investments  in 2006 related toinvestment was the acquisition of a companycogeneration plant in Italy for €18 million and TDUEstonia (Digismart) in Australia for €16 million.

·

Transportation: €253 million, compared to €175 million in 2005. The principal financial investments in 2006 related to the acquisition of an interest in SNCMEnergy Services Division for €72 million, of Shuttleport and Supershuttle in the United States for €28 million and €72 million respectively, of Dunn Line in the United Kingdom for €15 million and the acquisition of the company which holds the contract of Nordtrafikk in Norway for €12 million.


Cash related to financial investments totaled €161 million, related essentially to SNCM (€101 million) and Biffa Belgium (€24 million) companies.

New Operating Financial Assets (IFRIC 12 and IFRIC 4 loans)

As discussed above under “Critical Accounting Policies – Accounting for Concessions,” when we enter into concession agreements under IFRIC 12 we record an asset in our consolidated balance sheet that is treated as either a financial asset or an intangible asset, depending on the nature of our compensation arrangements. See Note 1.20 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further details.  Certain contracts qualify for treatment as lease contracts pursuant to IAS17 and its interpretation IFRIC4.  We also record operating financial assets in respect of those contracts.  See Note 1.21 to our consolidated statements for further details.  




Back to contents



New operating financial assets were €361are made up of IFRIC 12 and IFRIC 4 loans (see notes 1.21 and 1.22 to our consolidated financial statements) and totaled €500 million in 2006,2009, compared to €513€529 million in 2005, breaking2008, and break down as follows:

·

Water: €262€279 million down 14.7%.in the Water Division, mainly comprising new operating financial assets under the Berlin contract and certain investments in Asia (China and Korea) and the Middle East (Oman Sur);

·

€74 million in the Environmental Services: €20 million, down 80.0%.

·

Energy Services: €63 million, down 34.4%.

·

Transportation: €16 million,Services Division, representing an increase of 60.0%€19 million and comprising various investments in Europe;

€121 million in the Energy Services Division, representing a decrease of €12 million compared to 2008; and

€26 million in the Transportation Division.



110



Back to Contents


Industrial and Financial Divestitures

Divestitures amounted to €1,153 million in 2009, compared to €762 million in 2008, and break down as follows:

industrial divestitures of €259 million, including €158 million in the Transportation Division (Freightactivity for €94 million); and

financial divestitures of €894 million, including:

incineration activity in the United States in Environmental Services for €220 million;

Veolia Propreté Nettoyage Multiservices for €111 million in the Environmental Services Division;

facilities Management activities in the United Kingdom in the Energy Services Division for €90 million; and

water activities in North Africa and the Middle East for €189 million.

Principal Payments on Operating Financial Assets

Principal payments on operating financial assets amounted to €455 million in 2009 (including €204 million in the Water Division and €150 million in the Energy Services Division), compared to €358 million in 2008.

Issue of Share Capital to Non-Controlling Interests

The issue of share capital to non-controlling interests totaled €138 million in 2009, compared to €27 million in 2008. It mainly concerns the Water Division for €97 million in 2009 and corresponds to the issuance by Veolia Voda of new shares representing a 6.88% interest to the ERBD in the amount of €70 million.

Cash flows from operations minus total net investments

In order to monitor its liquidity position after taking into account net investments, we use an indicator equal to our adjusted operating cash flow, plus operating cash flow from discontinued activities, less total net investments. The following table breaks down this indicator by Division:


(€ million)

As of
December 31,
2009

As of
December 31,
2008

Water

1,152

613

Environmental Services

977

40

Energy Services

279

185

Transportation

153

(58)

Other

(204)

(179)

Adjusted operating cash flow, plus operating cash flow from discontinued operations, less total net investment

2,357

601




111



Back to Contents


Financing Activities

Net cash from / (used in) financing activities in 2009 and 2008:

We used a net amount of €540 million of cash in financing activities in 2009, compared to a net cash inflow from financing activities of €290 million in 2008. The following table breaks down our net cash used in (or from) financing activities in 2008 and 2009.


(€ million)

December 31, 2009

December 31, 2008

Change

Net increase/(decrease) in current borrowings

(1,324)

(1,437)

113

New non-current borrowings and other debts

3,301

3,590

(289)

Principal payments on non-current borrowings and other debt

(1,515)

(185)

(1,330)

Issue of share capital by the non-controlling interests

157

(80)

237

Other movements in equity

5

3

2

Dividends paid

(434)

(754)

320

Interest paid

(730)

(847)

117

Net cash from (used in) financing activities in the cash flow statement

(540)

290

(830)


These changes were mainly due to:

a €289 million decrease in new non-current borrowings and other debts in the cash flow statement:

in 2009, we issued €2,250 million of new bonds;

in 2008, we issued new bonds under our EMTN (Euro Medium Term Notes) program in the amount of €572 million; we reopened the GBP-denominated series 24 bond issue maturing in 2037 in the amount of GBP 150 million (Euro equivalent of €157 million as of December 31, 2008); we reopened the EUR-denominated series 21 bond issue maturing in 2017 in the amount of €140 million; we opened the series 15 corporate bond issue maturing in 2015, in the amount of €275 million; finally, on May 21, 2008 we issued a new €1.8 billion fixed-rate bond.

Principal payments on non-current borrowings and other debt totalled €1,515 million in 2009, compared to €185 million in 2008, representing an increase of €1,330 million.

In 2009, principal payments on non-current borrowings and other debt related to transactions on the multi-currency syndicated loans, including essentially the repayment of €800 million on the Euro syndicated loan;

In 2008, principal payments on non-current borrowings and other debt were not significant.

a €117 million decrease over the period in interest paid in line with the decrease in the Group financing rate;

a decrease of €113 million in current borrowings; and

a decrease of €320 million in dividends paid; of the €434 million in dividends paid in 2009, €232 million was paid to shareholders of the parent company (€554 million less dividends paid in shares of €322 million), and the remainder was paid to non-controlling interests in entities that we control.



112



Back to Contents


Sources of Funds

Financings

As of December 31, 2009, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s rated Veolia Environnement SA as follows:

Short-term

Long-term

Outlook

Recent events

Moody’s

P-2

A3

Negative

On March 26, 2009, Moody’s confirmed the ratings assigned to Veolia Environnement on June 27, 2005, but downgraded the outlook from stable to negative.

Standard & Poor’s

A-2

BBB+

Negative

On March 25, 2009, Standard and Poor’s confirmed the ratings assigned to Veolia Environnement on October 3, 2005, but downgraded the outlook from stable to negative. On January 4, 2010, these ratings were confirmed by Standard and Poor’s.


In 2009, Veolia Environnement continued to implement an active refinancing policy. The main borrowings maturing in 2009 that were repaid or refinanced are as follows:

€800 million draw-down on the syndicated loan was repaid on April 17, 2009;

the CZK660 million EMTN Series 8 bond issue (€22.1 million Euro equivalent at historical rates), which matured on April 29, 2009; and

the U.S. $27 million EMTN Series 13 bond issue (€22.2 million Euro equivalent at historical rates), which matured on March 4, 2009.

In addition, Veolia Environnement issued €2,250 million of new bonds under its EMTN (Euro Medium Term Notes) program:

On April 24, 2009, Veolia Environnement issued:

€1,250 million principle amount of new bonds, bearing fixed-rate interest at 5.25% per annum and maturing on April 24, 2014 (series 25) and

€750 million principle amount of new bonds, bearing fixed-rate interest at 6.75% per annum and maturing on April 24, 2019 (series 26).

On June 29, 2009, Veolia Environnement issued €250 million principle amount of new bonds, bearing fixed-rate interest at 5.70% per annum and maturing on June 29, 2017 (series 27).

We centralize our significant financings to ensure optimization. Certain financings contracted by the parent company contain restrictions on structural subordination intended to assure lenders that the majority of the financings are at the level of Veolia Environnement.

Our financing, including the notes issued by the Company under its EMTN program (€11.2 billion outstanding as of December 31, 2009) does not contain any event of default provisions tied to compliance with a debt ratio, an interest coverage ratio or a minimum credit rating, except for the 2003 U.S. private placement notes (see note 17 to our consolidated financial statements) of which €299.1 million were outstanding as of December 31, 2009 which are subject to two coverage ratios (debt hedging ratio < 5.3 and interest hedging ratio > 3.2).

Our existing syndicated credit documentation and bilateral credit lines do not contain any events of default tied to restrictive financial covenants (such as debt payout ratios or interest coverage ratios). The debt payout ratio (the ratio between net debt and operating cash flow adjusted for certain items) is used to determine the margin applicable to certain significant financings under pricing grids, such as the syndicated credit lines signed in 2004 for a maximum aggregate amount of US$1.125 billion (drawn down in the amount of approximately € 544 million as of December 31, 2009).



113



Back to Contents


At the end of 2009, we were in compliance with the covenants of all our material financings.

Financial ratios may also be used in certain project financings, which are generally implemented through project entities, for which the financing is based on cash flows generated by the relevant project. These project financings, the amounts of which are not individually significant at the Group level, are either without recourse or with limited recourse. In addition, in certain cases multilateral development banks may require our subsidiaries to include financial ratios relating to the financial statements of those entities in their financing agreements.

As of December 31, 2009, the financing agreements containing such covenants and amounting to more than €100 million (Group share) were as follows:

Borrower

Outstanding as of December 31, 2009

(€ million)

Type of covenant

Aquiris
(Water Division - Belgium)

179.1

DPR* and deadline for obtaining final acceptance for the plant

Delfluent
(Water Division – Netherlands)

112.4

DPR*, forecast DPR* and duration of financing

Shenzhen
(Water Division – China)

100.9

Minimum reserve account

Redal (Water Division – Morocco)

103.6

Working capital, equity/share capital and DPR*


*

Debt Payout Ratio (DPR) is equal to net financial debt divided by EBITDA. The minimum required ratios vary according to the financing.


As of December 31, 2009, the Group complied with all the covenants included in the documentation of these significant financing agreements.

With regard to the Aquiris project (a wastewater treatment plant in Brussels), the lenders waived their right as of January 29, 2010 to demand early repayment of the financing until June 30, 2010. At the same time, a demand guarantee, exercisable as of June 30, 2010 and maturing on August 31, 2010, was granted by Veolia Eau-CGE to the lenders.

A financing agreement with an outstanding amount of €81 million as of December 31, 2009 contained covenants with which the relevant borrower was not in compliance.

Liquidity

The following table sets forth our principal sources of available liquidity, on a gross basis and net of current debt, bank overdrafts and other cash position items, as of December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009:

(€ million)

As of
December 31,
2009

As of
December 31,
2008

As of
December 31,
2007

Veolia Environnement:

   

Undrawn Medium Term syndicated loans

3,694.6

2,890.3

4,000.0

Undrawn Medium Term credit lines

400.0

575.0

850.0

Undrawn Short Term credit lines

575.0

350.0

175.0

Other financial assets (marketable securities)

-

-

-

Cash & cash equivalents

4,091.2

2,283.6

1,550.8

Subsidiaries:

   

Cash & cash equivalents

1,523.2

1,566.0

1,564.8

Total liquid assets and availabilities

10,284.0

7,664.9

8,140.6

Current debt and bank overdrafts, and other cash position items

   

Current debt

2,983.1

3,219.7

3,805.0

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

454.9

465.7

459.4

Total current debts and bank overdrafts and other cash position items

3,438.0

3,685.4

4,264.4

Total liquid assets and availabilities, net of current debt and bank overdrafts, and other cash position items

6,846.0

3,979.5

3,876.2




114



Back to Contents



Undrawn credit lines as of December 31, 2009 are as follows:

Bank

Amount in € million

Maturity

NATIXIS

150

March 31, 2012

BNP Paribas

150

March 2, 2012

HSBC

100

June 30, 2011

RBS formerly ABN

100

December 29, 2010

SG

150

December 23, 2010

RBS

125

December 20, 2010

CIC and BFCM

100

November 15, 2010

CACIB

100

March 4, 2010

Total

975


Financial Debt Structure

We use net financial debt, a non-GAAP financial measure, to analyze our financial position. The following table sets forth the calculation of our net financial debt as of December 31, 2009:

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

Non-current borrowings

17,647.3

17,063.9

Current borrowings

2,983.1

3,219.7

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

454.9

465.7

Sub-total borrowings

21,085.3

20,749.3

Cash and cash equivalents

(5,614.4)

(3,849.6)

Fair value gains/losses on hedge derivatives

(343.2)

(371.5)

Net financial debt

15,127.7

16,528.2


The ratio of (i) net financial debt to (ii) cash flow from operations before working capital and income taxes paid plus cash generated from principal payments on operating financial assets, was 3.4 as of December 31, 2009 compared with 3.6 as of December 31, 2008. This ratio is used by management to monitor our capacity to repay debt. We generally seek to maintain this ratio between 3.5 and 4.0 on the basis of current accounting presentation.

Due to the change in the presentation rules for replacement costs in the consolidated cash flow statement (as described above under “—Accounting for Concessions and other items”), the calculation of this ratio will be amended from 2010, resulting in a target coverage ratio of between 3.85 and 4.35 (instead of 3.5 to 4 using the 2009 accounting presentation).

The following table sets forth the maturity schedule of our long-term borrowings as of December 31, 2009:

  

Maturing in

(€ million)

Amount

2 to 3 years

4 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Bond issues

13,264.5

1,045.2

2,951.7

9,267.6

Bank borrowings

4,382.8

1,511.1

779.7

2,092.0

Non-current borrowings

17,647.3

2,556.3

3,731.4

11,359.6


Research and Development; Patents and Licenses

See “Information on115



Back to Contents


Shareholders Equity

Total equity attributable to owners of the Company—Business Overview—Research and Development” and “Information on the Company—Business Overview—Intellectual Property” for a descriptionCompany was €7,460.6 million as of our investments in these areas.

Goodwill

Goodwill amounted to €5,705.0 million at December 31, 2006,2009, an increase of €459.4 million compared to €4,752.3€7,001.2 at year-end 2008. In addition to the impact of 2009 net income and the payment of the €1.21 per share fiscal year 2008 dividend in 2009, we recorded foreign exchange translation adjustments of €82.4 million at December 31, 2005. Thein 2009, as well as €82.0 million of net investment hedge adjustments (which represent currency translation adjustments on certain loans to affiliates that meet the criteria of a net investment as defined under IAS 21 “The effect of changes in foreign exchange rates”). We also recorded an increase of €952.7€341.1 million reflects our growth during fiscal year 2006: €784.1 millionin equity from the issuance of new shares, primarily as a result of the increase relateselection by shareholders to the Cash Generating Unit (“CGU”) Waste Management United Kingdom, following the acquisition of Cleanaway, €86 million relates to the CGU Central Europe Water following the securing of contractsreceive their 2008 dividends in Slovakia, and €64.7 million relates to the CGU North America Transport following the acquisitions of Superhuttle International and Shuttleport.  Given these developments, the CGUs of each division are concentrated in France, the United States, Germany, Great Britain and the Czech Republic.new shares.

The CGUs carrying the most significant amounts of goodwill at December 31, 2006 were Waste Management United Kingdom (€894 million), Water France (€729 million) and Solid Waste Management North America (€610 million).

Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)

Our investment policy requires us to analyze different criteria in making investment decisions, including decisions relating to capital expenditures and financial investments.  In order “ROCE” or “Return on Capital Employed” is a measurement tool that we use to manage the profitability ofreturn on our contracts globally we use a measureand to make investment decisions, without regard to the method of performance, which we refer to as “return on capital employed”financing of those investments (equity or “ROCE,” that measures our ability to provide a return on the capital invested in our business.  We definedebt). ROCE asis the ratio of (i) our results of operations, net of tax, and our share of net income offrom operations (adjusted operating income, after income from associates and tax, but excluding revenue fromand tax related to operating financial assets,assets), divided by (ii) the average amount of capital employed in our business during the same year.

Since the shift to IFRS in 2005, for purposes of our ROCE calculation, capital Capital employed excludes operating financial operating assets and operatingnet income from operations excludes the related income. The implementation of IFRIC12 in 2006 introduced important modifications affecting financial operating assets, which are accounted for in the adjusted financial statements.  

Net results ofincome from operations areis calculated as follows:

 (€ millions)

2006

2005
(adjusted)

Adjusted operating income

2,222.2

1,903.6

+ Share of net income of associates

6.0

6.5

- Income tax expense(1)(2)

(463.2)

(401.6)

- Revenues of operational financial assets

(351.0)

(325.8)

+ Income tax concerning operational financial assets

54.5

44.7

Net results of operations

1,468.5

1,227.4

(1)

In 2004, the financial restructuring transactions that followed the divestiture of US businesses in the Water Division generated tax-loss carry forwards recognized in the consolidated balance sheet. Given its exceptional character, an amount of €138.4 million, representing the gain in earnings, was eliminated from the calculation of ROCE. In 2005 and 2006, the use of these carry forwards led to a €20.8 million and €32.7 million charge respectively, which was also eliminated from the ROCE calculation.

(2)

In 2006, the non-recurring deferred tax benefit of €86.3 million, linked to the restructuring of the U.S. tax group, was excluded from the ROCE calculation.

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

Adjusted operating income

1,932.4

2,275.0

+ Share of net income of associates

1.4

19.4

- Income tax expense (1) (2)

(213.2)

(411.4)

- Revenue from operating financial assets

(394.4)

(397.9)

+ Income tax expense allocated to operating financial assets

77.1

75.4

Net income from operations

1,403.3

1,560.5


(1)

 In 2004, the financial restructuring transactions following the divestiture of the U.S. activities of the Water Division generated tax losses which were recognized in the consolidated balance sheet. Given its exceptional nature, the resulting credit of €138.4 million recognized in net income was eliminated from the calculation of ROCE. The utilization of these tax losses in 2008 and 2009 generated charges of €8.7 million and €29.0 million respectively, which were similarly eliminated from the calculation of ROCE.

(2)

In 2008, the review of the business plan of Veolia Environmental Services Germany, led to the recognition of an impairment charge of €41.9 million in respect of deferred tax assets, which is eliminated from the calculation of ROCE.




116



Back to Contents


Average capital employed during the year is defined as the average betweenof opening and closing capital employed at the beginning and the end of the year.employed. Capital employed is defined asequal to the sum of all net tangible and intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, goodwill net of impairment, investments in associates, net operating and non-operating working capital requirements and net derivatives after deduction ofderivative instruments less provisions and other non-current liabilities.




Back to contents



debts. Capital employed in 2009 includes the assets of companies classified as assets held for sale as of December 31, 2009. Capital employed is calculated in the following manner:as follows:

 (€ millions)

December
31, 2006

December
31, 2005
(adjusted)

December
31, 2004

Net tangible and intangible assets

11,644.1

10,258.9

8,975.9

Goodwill net of impairment

5,705.0

4,752.3

4,246.8

Investments in associates

241.0

201.5

219.2

Net operating and non-operating working capital requirement(1)

198.8

160.8

205.9

Net derivatives(2)

26.9

(66.6)

(49.0)

Provisions

(3,022.5)

(2,402.0)

(2,008.7)

Other non-current liabilities

(207.3)

(203.7)

(159.7)

Capital employed

14,585.0

12,701.2

11,430.4

Average capital employed

13,643.1

12,065.8

 

(1)

including net deferred tax but excluding deferred tax related to US divestitures and related restructurings (€84.9 million in 2006, €117.6 million  in 2005 and €126.6 million in 2004).

(2)

excluding hedging instruments relating to debt at fair value for €28.8 million in 2006, €161.1 million in 2005 and €284.0 million in 2004.

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31, 2007

Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, net(1)

14,628.9

14,434.2

13,869.8

Goodwill, net of impairment

6,720.6

6,674.2

6,782.0

Investments in associates

268.5

306.8

290.3

Operating and non-operating working capital requirements, net(2)

(182.1)

92.3

3.8

Net derivative instruments and other(3)

(70.6)

51.0

79.0

Provisions

(3,063.9)

(2,937.8)

(2,915.9)

Other non-current debt

-

-

 

Capital employed

18,301.4

18,620.7

18,109.0

Clemessy & Crystal (Energy Services Division)

-

-

35.1

Transportation United Kingdom

-

54.5

94.3

Waste-to-Energy (Environmental Services Division)

-

53.0

48.1

Veolia Freight (Transportation Division)

-

125.0

118.1

Renewable Energies

-

58.8

-

Capital employed published in 2008

-

18,912.0

18,404.6

    

Average capital employed

18,461.0

18,364.8

 


(1)

Including the investment in Tianjin Shibei (Water Division) for €219 million in 2007.

(2)

Including net deferred assets but excluding deferred taxes relating to U.S. divestitures and associated restructuring (€23.1 million in 2009, €52.0 million in 2008 and €60.7 million in 2007).

(3)

Excluding debt fair value hedging derivatives for €343.2 million in 2009, €371.5 million in 2008 and €(27.7) million in 2007.


The Company’sGroup’s return on capital employed (ROCE) is as follows:


(€ millions)

Net results
of operations

Average capital
employed during
the year

ROCE

    

2006

1,468.5

13,643.1

10.8%

2005

1,227.4

12,065.8

10.2%

(€ million)

Net income from operations

Average capital employed

ROCE

2009

1,403.3

18,461.0

7.6%

2008

1,560.5

18,364.8

8.5%


In contrast to key indicators of the income statement, ROCE is relatively insensitive to currency effects.

The positive changedecrease in ROCE in 2006 reflected2009 is primarily attributable to trends in operating performance and the combined effect of the Veolia Environnement 2005 efficiency plan, further  maturity in the contract portfolioeconomic environment.



117



Back to Contents


Capital employed breaks down by Division and control over capital employed.country as follows:

As of
December 31,
2009

(€ million)

France

Germany

United
Kingdom

Rest of
Europe

United
States

Oceania

Asia

Middle
East

Rest
of the
world

Total

Water

1,141.1

604.3

1,184.3

1,296.2

170.8

12.7

1,399.9

8.7

377.1

6,195.1

Environmental Services

1,656.5

734.3

1,058.6

808.5

1,194.1

282.9

162.5

55.4

152.0

6,104.8

Energy Services

1,044.4

86.3

80.1

2,007.0

589.0

10.6

108.1

16.0

75.8

4,017.3

Transportation

657.9

37.9

(1.0)

468.7

229.2

50.4

43.5

17.0

58.7

1,562.3

Unallocated amounts(1)

(26.4)

-

(67.6)

162.0

275.0

-

-

(0.5)

79.4

421.9

Segment assets

4,473.5

1,462.8

2,254.4

4,742.4

2,458.1

356.6

1,714.0

96.6

743.0

18,301.4


As of
December 31,
2008

(€ million)

France

Germany

United
Kingdom

Rest of
Europe

United
States

Oceania

Asia

Middle
East

Rest
of the
world

Total

Water

1,263.0

594.6

1,001.0

1,177.1

200.7

(0.7)

1,393.7

(31.1)

650.0

6,248.3

Environmental Services

1,742.6

804.5

1,032.6

836.7

1,299.6

218.1

173.5

62.7

159.6

6,329.9

Energy Services

1,042.4

92.2

103.7

1,977.3

580.6

9.4

104.0

23.1

66.1

3,998.8

Transportation

586.8

73.6

(0.9)

521.4

251.5

1.5

(4.4)

14.9

44.8

1,489.2

Unallocated amounts(1)

14.1

(0.1)

(72.6)

240.4

310.6

0.1

-

-

62.0

554.5

Segment assets

4,648.9

1,564.8

2,063.8

4,752.9

2,643.0

228.4

1,666.8

69.6

982.5

18,620.7


Change

(€ million)

France

Germany

United
Kingdom

Rest of
Europe

United
States

Oceania

Asia

Middle
East

Rest
of the
world

Total

Water

(121.9)

9.7

183.3

119.1

(29.9)

13.4

6.2

39.8

(272.9)

(53.2)

Environmental Services

(86.1)

(70.2)

26.0

(28.2)

(105.5)

64.8

(11.0)

(7.3)

(7.6)

(225.1)

Energy Services

2.0

(5.9)

(23.6)

29.7

8.4

1.2

4.1

(7.1)

9.7

18.5

Transportation

71.1

(35.7)

(0.1)

(52.7)

(22.3)

48.9

47.9

2.1

13.9

73.1

Unallocated amounts(1)

(40.5)

0.1

5.0

(78.4)

(35.6)

(0.1)

-

(0.5)

17.4

(132.6)

Segment assets

(175.4)

(102.0)

190.6

(10.5)

(184.9)

128.2

47.2

27.0

(239.5)

(319.3)


(1)

 Including holding companies, other central entities and Proactiva.



118



Back to Contents


Contractual Obligations

We have various contractual obligations arising from our operations. These obligations are more fully described in this document under various headings in this “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” as well as in the notes to our consolidated financial statements.




Back to contents



The following table lists the aggregate maturities of our long-term debt, operating leases, capital leases and closure and post-closure costs (Waste) at December 31, 2006 (in millions of euro):2009:

  

Payments Due by Period

  

Contractual Obligations

Total

Less than
2 years

2 to 5 years

After  5 years

 

————

————

————

————

Long-Term Debt Obligations(1)

16,905.7

2,904.1

4,464.7

9,536.9

Operating Lease Obligations

2,125.9

496.1

1,179.5

450.3

Capital Lease Obligations

1,244.0

227.5

560.4

456.1

Closure and post-closure

457.7

59.9

167.,5

230.3

     

Total

20,733.3

3,687.6

6,372.1

10,673.6

 

=========

=========

=========

=========

_____________________

(1)

The weighted average interest rate on our long-term debt obligations during 2006 was 5.07%. This weighted average interest rate takes into account the effect of our derivative instruments. A description of the way in which we account for derivative instruments and manage the market risks to which we are exposed is set forth in Note 32 to our consolidated financial statements. After taking into account hedging transactions, 52.6% of our net debt bears interest at fixed rates. After further taking into account the impact of interest rate caps, this percentage increases to 63.4%. Assuming a constant net debt policy, a 0.25% increase in interest rates would generate an increase in the annual interest rate charges, excluding market impact, of €9.4 million.

(€ million)

Payments Due by Period

Contractual Obligations

Total

Less than 1 year

2 to 3
years

4 to 5
years

After 5
years

Long-Term Debt Obligations(1) (2)

19,862.6

2,865.7

2,302.8

3,594.0

11,100.1

Operating Lease Obligations(1) (2)

2,753.7

567.7

864.5

624.6

696.9

Capital Lease Obligations(3)

991.4

169.8

289.3

174.0

358.3

Closure and post-closure(4)

638.3

71.7

107.6

57.5

401.5

Total

24,246.0

3,674.9

3,564.2

4,450.1

12,556.8

(1)

Including non-current and current borrowings, but excluding capital lease obligations (see (3) below).

(2)

We are also obligated to pay interest on our long-term and other debt obligations. To measure our obligations, we use a tool that we call the “financing rate”, which we define as the ratio between the cost of net debt (equal to finance costs, net, excluding fair value adjustments on financial instruments not qualifying for hedge accounting) to average net financial debt (based on a monthly weighted average). In 2009, the financing rate was 4.76%. A description of the way in which we account for derivative instruments and manage the market risks to which we are exposed is set forth in Note 29 to our consolidated financial statements. After taking into account hedging transactions, 51.3% of our financial debt bears interest at fixed rates. Assuming a constant net debt policy, a 0.5% increase in interest rates would generate an increas e in net finance costs of €15 million.

(3)

 Corresponds to future minimum lease payments.

(4)

Excluding provisions for environmental risks.


Off Balance Sheet Arrangements


The following discussion of our material off-balance sheet commitments should be read together with Note 4136 to our consolidated financial statements included herein, which discusses such commitments in greater detail. In the ordinary course of our business, we may enter into various contractual commitments with third parties whichthat are not recorded in our balance sheet. These commitments include, among others, operational guarantees, financial guarantees, obligations to buy or sell and letters of credit given on our part. Operational guarantees constitute the greatest share of these off-balance sheet commitments, which we generally use to guarantee the performance commitments given by our subsidiaries to their customers. Often, these performance commitments are guaranteed by an insurance company or a financial institution, which then requires a counter-guarantee from us.

The following is a breakdown of the off-balance sheetSpecific commitments given in the ordinary course of our business (in millions of euros), excluding the commitment relating to the Berlin Water Contract (described below):


(in € millions)

As of December 31, 2005 adjusted

As of December 31, 2006

Maturity

 

Less than
1 year

1 to 5
years

More than
5 years

      

Operational guarantees

3,108.4

4,043.6

808.3

1,561.5

1,673.8

Financial guarantees

     

Debt guarantees

250.8

300.7

98.2

111.6

90.9

Warranty obligations given

515.5

448.6

19.0

315.5

114.1

Commitments given

     

Obligations to buy

94.6

149.3

113.7

34.3

1.3

Obligations to sell

8.6

31.3

19.4

9.9

2.0

Other commitments given

     

Letters of credit

819.7

904.5

278.9

621.3

4.3

Other commitments given

772.2

749.8

181.3

304.1

264.4

Total

5,569.8

6,627.8

1,518.8

2,958.2

2,150.8





Back to contents



The following is a breakdown of such commitments by division:


(in € millions)

As of December
31, 2006

As of December
31, 2005 adjusted

Water

3,353.2

2,388.4

Environmental Services

867.7

715.2

Energy Services

543.0

541.6

Transportation

294.9

274.4

Proactiva

5.7

10.3

Holding companies

1,598.3

1,584.7

Other

56.0

55.2

Total

6,627.8

5,569.8


In addition, we sometimes enter into off-balance sheet commitments outside the ordinary course of our business.  The most significant of these commitments are described below.


Specific Berlin contract commitments

Under the Berlin water contract, we may be obligatedthe Group plans to purchase easement rights of passage for water pipes from landowners still not indemnified who have presented claims for payments.landowners. The cost to usgross amount of this investment could total up toreach €426 million (50%). In the event, approximately €175 million of acquisition of these rights from land owners, these rightswhich would represent an element of the remuneration of the Berlin water contractbe born by the Berlin Lander, representing a net commitment of €250 million for the Group. Given the uncertain nature of estimating these easement rights, this commitment was retained off-balance sheet as of December 31, 2007.

More precise estimates were performed in 2008, valuing the easement at €113 million (100%), including a portion, estimated at €57 million, to be reimbursed by the Berlin Lander. The Group therefore recognized an asset and disbursments wouldoperating liability of €113 million in the consolidated balance sheet in 2008. As these rights vest over the period to 2011, the amounts paid will be recorded, net of amounts reimbursed by the Berlin Lander, in operating financial assets in our consolidated balance sheet.


and remunerated pursuant to the contract.

Agreements with EDF

We haveVeolia Environnement granted to EDF a call option covering all of ourits Dalkia shares in the event that an EDF competitor takes control of our company.Company. Likewise EDF granted usVeolia Environnement a call option covering all of its Dalkia shares, exercisable in the event that there isof a change in the legal status of EDF and that one or more of our competitors,should a Veolia Environnement competitor, acting alone or in concert, takestake control of EDF. Failing an agreement on the share transfer price, this would be decided by an expert.



119



Back to Contents


Other Commitments Given

Other commitments and contingencies include neither collateral guarantees supporting borrowings (see Note 36 to our consolidated financial statements) nor the specific commitments and contingencies described above. The following table sets forth our other commitments given as of the dates indicated.

    

Maturing in

(€ million)

As of
December 31,
2007

As of
December 31,
2008

As of
December 31,
2009

Less than
1 year

1 to 5
years

More than
5 years

Operational guarantees including performance bonds

5,591.4

6,624.9

6,950.9

2,442.4

2,418.8

2,089,7

Financial guarantees

 835.6

667.5

679.4

229.4

275.8

174.2

Debt guarantees

355.6

303.0

258.3

89.3

113.6

55.4

Vendor warranties given

480.0

364.5

421.1

140.1

162.2

118.8

Commitments given

617.1

507.8

431.6

283.7

97.6

50.3

Purchase commitments

589.9

476.5

425.1

277.8

97.6

49.7

Sales commitments

27.2

31.3

6.5

5.9

-

0.6

Other commitments given

957.3

912.7

1,065.3

489.4

267.2

308.7

Letters of credit

573.8

706.7

604.5

329.1

152.1

123.3

Other commitments given

383.5

206.0

460.8

160.3

115.1

185.4

Other commitments given

8,001.4

8,712.9

9,127.2

3,444.9

3,059.4

2,622.9


The following table breaks down our other commitments by Division as of December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009:

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31,2007

Water

6,036.4

5,891.8

4,368.3

Environmental Services

831.1

901.7

1,171.1

Energy Services

700.3

538.1

755.7

Transportation

533.2

415.8

398.3

Proactiva

45.2

50.6

39.8

Holding companies

942.0

891.3

1,241.5

Other

39.0

23.6

26.7

Total

9,127.2

8,712.9

8,001.4




120



Back to contentsContents



ITEM 6.

DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT

Our company has beenCompany is asociété anonyme à conseil d’administration since its general shareholders’ meeting held on April 30, 2003,, which is a French corporation with a single boardBoard of directors.Directors. Our shares are quotedlisted on the Eurolist ofEuronext Paris by NYSE Euronext and, in the form of American Depository Shares, on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). We are subject to French regulations, in particular relating to corporate governance, and to regulations applicable to foreign companies listed in the U.S.United States.

See “Item 16G. Corporate Governance” for a summary of significant ways in which our corporate governance practices differ from those followed by NYSE listed companies.

Board of Directors

Our boardBoard of directorsDirectors has adopted an internal charter, as well as internal charters for each board committee, aimed at followingthe Accounts and Audit Committee, the Nominations and Compensation Committee and the Strategic Research, Innovation and Sustainable Development Committee, respectively. The purpose of these charters was initially to apply the recommendations of the report of a French blue ribbon panelworking group chaired by Mr. Daniel Bouton forrelating to the improvement of corporate governance practices in French public companies.companies (known as the “Bouton report”).

The internal rules and regulations of the Accounts and Audit Committee were amended by our Board of Directors at its meeting on March 24, 2009 to take into account the order (ordonnance) of December 8, 2008 that transposed the eighth directive on statutory audits of corporate financial statements into French law.

Pursuant to French law, our Company is required to refer to a corporate governance code and to comply with the provisions of such code or to declare the provisions it does not comply with and the reasons for which it decided not to apply such provisions. At its meeting of January 7, 2009, our Board of Directors reviewed the consolidated version of the AFEP-MEDEF code of December 2008 (a code of recommended practices for governance and executive compensation that is widely used in France) (the “AFEP-MEDEF Code”) and confirmed that this code was consistent with our existing corporate governance practices. We believe that our practices conform to currently standard corporate governance practices in France.the provisions of the AFEP-MEDEF Code that our Company has decided to apply.

Composition and appointment of the Board of Directors

Our company’s boardAs of the date hereof, the Board of Directors has fifteen members. The list of directors, must have between 3the expiration date of their terms of office and 18other personal information about them is set forth below. A change in the composition of the Board of Directors will be proposed to the general shareholders’ meeting on May 7, 2010 comprising the appointment of two new directors, the ratification of one interim appointment and the appointment of one “censeur” (non-voting member). (see Item 8: “Financial Information Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information – Significant Changes”, below).

From among the directors who are individuals, the Board elects a Chairman and, if required, a Vice-Chairman, for a term of office not to exceed their terms of office as directors. The members subjectof the Board of Directors are appointed by an ordinary general shareholders’ meeting pursuant to applicable law.a proposal made by the Board of Directors, which itself receives proposals from the Nominations and Compensation Committee. Directors may be removed from office at any time by a decision of a general shareholders’ meeting. Each director must own at least 750 of our company’sregistered shares in registered form.  Each director is elected by the shareholders at an ordinary general meeting of the shareholders for a renewable six-year term, based on proposals made by the board of directors, which itself receives proposals from the nominations and compensation committee. The board of directors elects a chairman and, if necessary, one or two vice-chairmen, for a term not exceeding the length of such persons’ terms as directors.

Our directors can be removed from office by a majority shareholder vote at any time.  Company.

The boardCompany’s Board of directorsDirectors does not currently include any members elected by the employees or any deputy directorsnon-voting members (censeurs), but. However, a representative of our company’sthe Company’s works council attends board(comité d’entreprise) is entitled to attend Board of directorDirectors’ meetings in a consultative role.non-voting, advisory capacity.

A Frenchsociété anonyme(corporation) with a Board of Directors may choose to separate the duties of the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer or have a single person hold these positions. As stated in the AFEP-MEDEF corporate governance code, the law does not favor either possibility, and it is the Board of Directors’ prerogative to choose between these two methods of executive management, depending on the specific requirements of each company.

When the articles of incorporation were amended on April 30, 2003, thereby converting the Company into a company with a Board of Directors, the Board of Directors had decided that the duties of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer would be performed by the Chairman of the Board of Directors. However, on November 2, 2009, the Board of Directors decided, effective November 27, 2009, to separate the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors.



121



Back to Contents


Chairman of the Board of Directors

The termsappointment of halfMr. Henri Proglio as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of EDF led the Board to conduct an in-depth review of changes to be made to the Company’s governance from October to November 2009. The Board decided that it was in the interest of the Company and its shareholders to maintain continuity and stability vis-à-vis its customers and employees by retaining Mr. Henri Proglio as Chairman of the Board of Veolia Environnement, while separating this position from that of Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Proglio has informed our company that he intends to remain in this position through 2010, and that he will resign from this position at the end of 2010.

Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors (Senior independent director)

On October 21, 2009, the Board of Directors decided to create the position of Vice-Chairman to assist the Chairman in carrying out his duties of ensuring the proper functioning of the Company’s governance bodies, similar to the British concept of the senior independent director. In accordance with the Board’s internal rules and regulations, the Vice-Chairman is appointed from among the directors considered to be independent, for the duration of his term of office as an independent director. The Board appointed Louis Schweitzer, an independent director, to this position of Vice-Chairman, effective November 27, 2009.

Powers of the Board of Directors

In accordance with French law, the Board of Directors establishes the policies concerning the Company’s business and supervises the implementation thereof. Subject to the powers expressly granted by law to shareholders’ meetings and within the limits of the corporate purposes, the Board of Directors has the authority to consider all issues concerning the proper operation of the Company and, by its deliberations, resolves matters which concern the Board.

In addition to the powers conferred on the Board of Directors by French law, its internal rules and regulations impose an internal requirement that certain major decisions of the Chief Executive Officer be submitted for the Board of Directors’ prior approval. These internal limitations of authority are described below in the paragraphs concerning management.

Board Members

The following table sets forth the names and ages of the current members of our Board of Directors, the date of their first appointment, or renewal, as the case may be, to the Board and the date of expiration of their current term and their current principal business activities conducted outside of our Company. All positions and offices of our directors (or, if we have an uneven numberindicated below are given as of directors, half plus one additional director) come up for renewal every three years on a rolling basis.  The boardJanuary 31, 2010. Unless otherwise stated, all terms of directors currently consists of 14 members.  

Following the recommendations made by the nominations and compensation committeeoffice shall expire at the boardgeneral shareholders’ meeting for the year stated.

Pursuant to the recommendation of directors’our Nominations and Compensation Committee, our Board of Directors at its meeting held onof March 28, 2006,24, 2010, decided to propose to the general shareholders’ meeting of May 11, 2006 renewed7, 2010 the termsappointment of Mr. Antoine Frérot as director of our Company. Mr. Frérot joined Compagnie Générale des Eaux in 1990. He became Chief Executive Officer of CGEA Transport in 1995. In 2000, Mr Frérot became Chief Executive Officer of CONNEX, the Transport Division of Vivendi Environnemnt and a member of the Executive Committee of Vivendi Environnement. In January 2003, Antoine Frérot was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Eau, the Water Division of Veolia Environnement, and executive vice president of Veolia Environnement. Since November 2009, he has been the Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Environnement. Moreover, the general shareho lders’ meeting of May 7, 2010 will vote on the appointment, as a member of the Board on Directors, of Groupement Industriel Marcel Dassaut, French joint stock company (SAS), whose first permanent representative will be its Deputy Managing Director Mr. Olivier Costa de Beauregard. This shareholders’ meeting will also vote on the appointment of one “censeur” (supervisory non-voting member), Thierry Dassault. (see Item 8: “Financial Information Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information – Significant Changes”, below) In addition, this meeting will vote on the ratification of the appointment and renewal of the term of Esther Koplowitz. During its meeting held on December 17, 2009 the Board of Directors appointed Ms. Koplowitz with effect from January 1, 2010 in replacement of Murray Stuart who decided to retire from the Board. Ms. Koplowitz was a member of Veolia Environnement’s Supervisory Board from 2000 to 2002 and is currently Chairman of the Board of Directors and majority shareholder inFomento de Construcciones y Contratas (FCC).

Directors may be contacted at our headquarters, located at 36/38 avenue Kléber, 75116 Paris.



122



Back to Contents




Henri Proglio

Age 60

Date of first appointment:

4/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/07/2009

Expiration of term:

2013

Principal Function within our Company:

Chairman of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Electricité de France (EDF)


Louis Schweitzer*

Age 67

Date of first appointment:

4/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/07/2009

Expiration of term:

2011

Principal Function within our Company:

Director and Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Nominations and Compensation Committee since April 30, 2003

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman of the Board of Directors of AstraZeneca (UK)

Chairman of the Board of Directors of AB Volvo (Sweden)


Jean Azéma*

Age 57

Date of first appointment:

4/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/07/2009

Expiration of term:

2011

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive Officer of Groupama SA


Daniel Bouton*

Age 59

Date of first appointment:

4/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/11/2006

Expiration of term:

2010

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Nominations and Compensation Committee since April 1, 2005

Member of the Accounts and Audit Committee since November 2, 2009 and Chairman of this Committee since January 1, 2010.

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman of the Board of Directors ofDMJB Conseil

Senior Advisor ofRothschild &Cie Banque


Jean-François Dehecq*

Age 70

Date of first appointment:

05/11/2006

Expiration of term:

2010

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman of the Board of Directors of Sanofi-Aventis




123



Back to Contents




Pierre-André de Chalendar*

Age 51

Date of first appointment:

05/07/2009

Expiration of Term:

2011

Principal position held within the Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Accounts and Audit Committee since May 7, 2009

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive Officer of Compagnie de Saint-Gobain


Augustin de Romanet de Beaune*

Age 48

Date of first appointment:

03/29/2007

Renewal of term :05/07/2009

Expiration of term:

2013

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive Officer of Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations


Jean-Marc Espalioux*

Age 58

Date of first appointment:

04/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/11/2006

Expiration of term:

2010

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Accounts and Audit Committee since April 30, 2003

Member of the Strategic Research, Innovation and Sustainable Development Committee since September 14, 2006

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Financière Agache Private Equity

Advisor to Permira (Investment Fund)


Paul-Louis Girardot*

Age 76

Date of first appointment:

04/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/11/2006

Expiration of term:

2010

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Accounts and Audit Committee since April 1, 2005

Member of the Strategic Research, Innovation and Sustainable Development Committee since September 14, 2006

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Veolia Eau – Compagnie Générale des Eaux


Esther Koplowitz*

Date of first appointment (to replace Murray Stuart, pursuant to a decision of the Board of Directors on December 17, 2009 and subject to ratification by the General Shareholders Meeting to be held on May 7, 2010):

01/01/2010

Expiration of term:

2014 (subject to ratification by the General Shareholders Meeting to be held on May 7, 2010)

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

President of the Esther Koplowitz Foundation

Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors ofFomento de Construcciones y Contratas(F.C.C.) (representing B-1998 SL)




124



Back to Contents




Philippe Kourilsky

Age 67

Date of first appointment:

04/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/07/2009

Expiration of term:

2013

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Chairman of the Strategic Research, Innovation And Sustainable Development Committee since September 14, 2006

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Professor at the Collège de France.

Member of the Académie des Sciences.


Serge Michel

Age 83

Date of first appointment:

04/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/11/2006

Expiration of term:

2010

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Chairman of the Nominations and Compensation Committee since April 30,2003

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman of Soficot SAS


Baudouin Prot*

Age 58

Date of first appointment:

04/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/07/2009

Expiration of term:

2011

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Director and Chief Executive Officer of BNP Paribas


Georges Ralli

Age 61

Date of first appointment:

04/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/11/2006

Expiration of term:

2010

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive of European Investment Banking Business of Lazard Group LLC (USA)

Chief Executive Officer Vice President and Managing Partner of Lazard Frères Gestion SAS


Paolo Scaroni*

Age 63

Date of first appointment:

12/12/2006

Renewal of term :05/07/2009

Expiration of term:

2013

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive Officer of ENI (Italy)


*

Independent directors.




125



Back to Contents


Henri Proglio is a graduate of the Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales (HEC). He joined Compagnie Générale des Eaux in 1972 and was appointed Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of CGEA in 1990. He was appointed Executive Vice-President of Vivendi Universal and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Vivendi Water in 1999. He became Chairman of Veolia Environnement’s Management Board in 2000 and Chairman of the Board of Directors and was Chief Executive Officer from April 2003 to November 27, 2009, on which date he was appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement following his appointment as Chairman and Managing Director of Electricité de France (EDF) by decree of the President of the French Republic issued during the Ministerial Council meeting of November 25, 2009.

Louis Schweitzer is a graduate of the Institut d’Etudes Politiques (IEP) in Paris and of the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA) and was a financial controller in the Treasury department. From 1981 to 1986, he was chief of staff for Laurent Fabius (who was successively junior Budget Minister, Minister for Industry and Research and Prime Minister). In 1986, he joined Renault’s senior management and then successively held the positions of director of planning and management control, Chief Finance Officer and Executive Vice-President. He was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Renault in December 1990, then Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in May 1992 until April 29, 2005, when he was appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors of Renault. Louis Schweitzer did not wish to seek the renewal of his term of office as Director of Renault during the annu al general meeting held on May 6, 2009. He was appointed Vice Chairman of the Veolia Environnement Board of Directors on November 27, 2009.

Jean Azéma holds an engineering degree from the Ecole Supérieure d’Agriculture de Purpan (ESAP), as well as a degree from the Centre National d’Etudes Supérieures de Sécurité Sociale (CNESS). He began his career at Union Départementale de la Mutualité Agricole des Pyrénées Orientales in 1975, moved to the Centre National d’Etudes Supérieures de la Sécurité Sociale from 1978 to 1979, and to the Union Départementale de la Mutualité Agricole of Allier from 1979 to 1987. From 1987 to 1995, Mr. Azéma served as financial director of Groupama Vie, investments director for Groupama, account management and consolidation director at Caisse Centrale des Assurances Mutuelles Agricoles (CCAMA) and insurance director at CCAMA. In 1996, he was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Groupama Sud-Ou est, in 1998, Chief Executive Officer of Groupama Sud and in June 2000, Chief Executive Officer of Groupama. Jean Azéma is currently Chief Executive Officer of Groupama SA and of Fédération Nationale Groupama, Chairman of the Fédération Française des Sociétés d’Assurance Mutuelles and deputy Chairman of Fédération Française des Sociétés d’Assurance.

Daniel Bouton holds a degree in political science, is a graduate of the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA) and is a former financial controller in the Treasury department. He has held a number of positions in the French Ministry of Economy, Finance and Industry, including that of budget director, between 1988 and 1991. In 1991, he began working at Société Générale, serving as Chief Executive Officer starting in 1993, and as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer starting in 1997. He was appointed to the position of Chairman of the Board of Directors of Société Générale in May 2008, then resigned from his duties of Director and President of the bank in May 2009. In November 2009, Daniel Bouton Jean-Marc Espalioux, Paul-Louis Girardot, Serge Michel, Georges Ralli and Murray Stuart for six years, and appointed Mr. Jean-Francoisincorporated a consulting company, DMJB Conseil, of which he is the President.

Jean-François Dehecq as is a replacement for Mr. Jacques Espinasse.  The terms will now come up for renewal based on seniority of appointment.  

Following the recommendationsgraduate of the nominationsEcole Nationale des Arts et Métiers. After having been a mathematics teacher from 1964 to 1965 at the Saint-Vincent de Senlis Catholic high school, he became a scientific research intern in the army’s nuclear propulsion department. In 1965, he joined the Société Nationale des Pétroles d’Aquitaine (SNPA, which later became Elf Aquitaine). After four years in the economics department (1965 to 1969), he became executive assistant (1969 to 1970), and compensation committee,then operations engineer (1970 to 1971) at the boardLacq plant, a major gas production site in France. In 1973, he became Chief Executive Officer of directors’ on December 12, 2006 appointed Mr. Paolo Scaroni asSanofi, a replacement for Mr. Arthur Laffer,major division of Elf Aquitaine. From 1982 to 1988, he was deputy Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Sanofi before assuming full management authority in February 1988. In 1999, he became Chairma n and Chief Executive Officer of Sanofi Synthelabo and, in 2004, organized the Sanofi-Aventis merger. Since 2007, Jean-François Dehecq has been the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Sanofi-Aventis.

Pierre-André de Chalendar is a graduate of ESSEC and the boardEcole Nationale d’Administration (ENA). He holds the rank of directors on March 29, 2007Government Finance Inspector. In November 1989, he joined Compagnie de Saint Gobain where he held various positions, before being appointed Mr.Deputy Chief Executive Officer in May 2005, Director in June 2006 then Chief Executive Officer of Compagnie de Saint Gobain since June 2007.



126



Back to Contents


Augustin de Romanet de Beaune is a graduate of the Institut d’Etudes Politiques (IEP) in Paris and of the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA). He began his career in the budget department of the French Ministry of Economy and Finance. In 1990, he was a finance attaché with France’s permanent mission to the European Community in Brussels, before returning to the budget department in 1993 as head of the budgetary analysis and policy office. In 1995, he became a technical advisor in the office of the Minister of the Economy and Finance, and then chief of staff to the junior Budget Minister. After having been a budgetary advisor to the deputy Budget Minister, government press secretary and project leader with the French Ministry of Economy and Finance from 1995 to 1997, Augustin de Romanet de Beaune became deputy director and project leader with the office of the budget director, then deputy director charged with the transportation sector in the budget department. In 1999 and 2000, he was successively appointed manager of Oddo et Compagnie and managing partner of Oddo Pinatton Corporate. In 2002, Augustin de Romanet de Beaune was appointed to the position of chief of staff of the deputy Budget and Budgetary Reform Minister and deputy chief of staff of the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Industry. From 2004 to 2005, he held the positions of chief of staff of the Minister of Employment, Labor and Social Cohesion, deputy chief of staff of the Prime Minister and deputy Secretary General to the Presidency of the Republic. After having been finance and strategy vice-president and a member of the Executive Committee of the Crédit Agricole Group since October 2006, Augustin de Romanet de Beaune was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations in March 2007.

Jean-Marc Espalioux holds degrees in political science, law and economics and is an alumnus of the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA). He was a financial controller in the Treasury department from 1978 to 1983. He joined Compagnie Générale des Eaux in 1984, becoming Chief Finance Officer in 1987 and Executive Vice-President in 1996. Jean-Marc Espalioux was a director of the Accor group from 1987 to 1996 and Chairman of the management board from 1997 to 2006. Jean-Marc Espalioux has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Financière Agache Private Equity since July 2006.

Paul-Louis Girardot was a director and Chief Executive Officer of Vivendi until 1998. He focused principally on developing the Veolia Environnement Group’s utilities concessions, particularly in the Water sector. In addition, he contributed significantly to Vivendi’s activities in the telephone sector, in particular mobile telephones. He also worked to expand the Veolia Environnement Group’s business in the Energy Services sector and in the decentralized production of electric power (cogeneration), through the Dalkia subsidiary. Paul-Louis Girardot has been Chairman of the supervisory board of Veolia Eau-Compagnie Générale des Eaux since 2001.

Ms. Esther Koplowitz (Marquise de Casa Peñalver) is the President of the Esther Koplowitz Foundation, which she created herself. Exclusively financed by contributions from its founder, the Esther Koplowitz Foundation is intended, firstly, to provide social and healthcare assistance to seniors, to the physically and mentally handicapped, to minors, and to people with problems of social integration or threatened with exclusion for physical, social or cultural reasons and, secondly, to support research. Since the time of its creation, the Esther Koplowitz Foundation has donated more than EUR 100 million, mainly devoted to building and fitting out homes for the elderly and underprivileged suffering from severe physical or mental handicaps (seven centers) and to the creation of a the Esther Koplowitz Biomedical Research Center (CIBEK by its French acronym), which aspir es to set the standard in its field in Spain. In recognition of her commitment to the social and humanitarian sectors and to research funding, Ms. Koplowitz, a Spanish business leader, has won numerous awards, including the Grand Cross of Civil Merit from the Spanish government, The Golden Cross of the Civil Order of Social Solidarity, from Her Majesty the Queen of Spain, the Blanquerna Prize, from the regional government of Catalonia, the Arms of the City of Barcelona, the title of Honorary Citizen of the City of Valencia; the Silver Medal of the Valencian Council of Culture; the Gold Medal of the Regional Community of Madrid; the Grand Cross of Health of Madrid; the Imserso Infante Cristina Prize for Social Merit in 2008; the Gold and Diamond Insignia of the Foundation of the Orphans of the Spanish National Police Force; the Montblanc Prize for the best company manager of 2004; and, finally, the Business Leader of the Year Award, granted by the US-Spain Chamber of Commerce in 2007. Member of the supervisor y board of Veolia Environnement from 2000 to 2002, Ms. Koplowitz is also vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chairman of the strategic committee and majority shareholder of the Spanish company Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas (FCC) specializing in environmental services, renewable energies, infrastructures and cement. She is also Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors of Cementos Portland Valderrivas, member of the Board of Directors of WRG (U.K.), ASA (Austria) and Alpine (Austria), as well as Chairman of the Board of Directors of B-1998, S.L. For several years now, Veolia Environnement and F.C.C. have jointly held a replacement for Mr. Francis Mayer.  These appointments were ratified by our shareholders’ meeting onsubsidiary, Proactiva Medio Ambiente S.A., present in Latin America.

Philippe Kourilsky is a graduate of the Ecole Polytechnique, and holds a doctorate in sciences from the University of Paris. He has devoted his career to life sciences research. He has held numerous management positions in the public and private research sectors, and in particular was the Director of Research at the CNRS and Director General of the Institut Pasteur from 2000 to 2005. Philippe Kourilsky is currently a professor at the Collège de France, a member of the Académie des Sciences and holds honorary doctorates from several foreign universities.



127



Back to Contents


Serge Michel has spent his entire career in the construction and public works sector. After having held the position of Executive Vice-President with the Compagnie de Saint-Gobain group and been Chairman of Socea, he chaired the SGE group until 1991 and the CISE group until 1997. He was Executive Vice-President of the Compagnie Générale des Eaux until 1992. He is currently Chairman of Soficot, a business management and investment consulting company he founded in 1997.

Baudouin Prot is a graduate of the Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales (HEC) and of the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA). From 1974 to 1983, he was successively the deputy to the prefect of the Franche-Comté region, financial controller in the Treasury department and deputy to the energy and raw materials director general in the Ministry of Industry. He joined Banque Nationale de Paris in 1983, where he held various positions before being appointed Executive Vice-President in 1992 and Chief Executive Officer in 1996. After having been appointed director and Executive Vice-President of BNP Paribas in March 2000, he has been a director and Chief Executive Officer of BNP Paribas since June 2003.

Georges Ralli holds a graduate degree (DESS) in banking and finance from the University of Paris-V and is a graduate of the Institut d’Etudes Politiques (IEP) in Paris and of the Institut Commercial in Nancy. In 1970, he joined Crédit Lyonnais, where he held various management positions until 1981. In 1982, he served as secretary of the Savings Development and Protection Commission. From 1982 to 1985, he headed the financial negotiations department of Crédit du Nord. He joined Lazard in 1986, and became managing partner in 1993 and jointly headed the mergers and acquisitions department of Lazard LLC starting in 1999. Since 2000, Georges Ralli has been Deputy Chairman and a member of the Executive Committee of Lazard LLC (United States). Since 2006, he has been the Co-Chairman of the European Investment Banking Committee of the Lazard Group LLC (United St ates) and a member of the European Advisory Board. He was head of Maison française from 2006 to 2009. He currently manages the European M&A activities (Chairman of Maison Lazard) and Asset Management activities (President of Lazard Frères Gestion).

Paolo Scaroni holds a degree in economics from Bocconi University in Milan and an MBA from Columbia Business School in New York. After having spent a year with McKinsey & Company following his MBA, between 1973 and 1985, he held various positions with Saint Gobain, ultimately heading the “flat glass” division. In 1985, Paolo Scaroni became Chief Executive Officer of Techint, while at the same time holding the positions of deputy Chairman of Falck and Executive Vice-President of SIV, a joint venture between Techint and Pilkington plc. He became Chief Executive Officer of Pilkington plc in 1996, a position he held until May 10, 2007.  2002. He was Chief Executive Officer of Enel from 2002 to 2005 and in June 2005 became Chief Executive Officer of Eni, a position he still holds.

Evaluation of the independence of directors

To qualify as “independent” under our boardAs defined by the Board of directors’ charter,Directors’ internal rules and regulations, an independent director is a director mustwho does not have any relationsrelationship with our company,the Company, its subsidiariesGroup or ourits management that could impaircompromise his objective judgment.  Our board ofability to exercise his judgment objectively. The criteria in the internal rules and regulations for determining directors’ charter sets forthindependence are in detail the independence criteria that each director must satisfy, which are based onaccordance with the recommendations of the Bouton report forAFEP-MEDEF corporate governance code.

These criteria are evaluated and weighted by the improvementBoard of corporate governance.

Nevertheless, our board of directors’ charter providesDirectors, which can determine that despite the fact that a certain measure of flexibility in applying these independence criteria: our board of directors may deem that one of its members is independent in light ofdirector does not meet the specific facts and circumstances of that member, even if that member fails to meet all of the independence criteria set forth in the charter; oninternal rules and regulations, a director can nevertheless be considered to be independent in light of his specific situation or that of the contrary,Company, taking into account its shareholders or any other reason. Conversely, the board may considerBoard of Directors can determine that one of its members shoulda director is not be declared independent even thoughdespite the fact that he meets the charter's independence criteria.criteria set forth in the internal rules and regulations.

Our boardThe internal rules and regulations also require that, each year, before the publication of directors’ charter provides that the board must annuallyreference document, the Board of Directors evaluate the independence of each of its members prior to publicationon the basis of our company’s French reference document.  This evaluation must take into account the independencecriteria contained in said rules set forth in its charter,and regulations, specific circumstances, the particular facts and circumstances involvedpositions of the relevant director, the Company and the conclusionsGroup and the opinion of our company’s nominationsthe Nominations and compensation committee.Compensation Committee.

After receivingreviewing the conclusionsopinion of the nominationsNominations and compensation committee, our boardCompensation Committee, at its meeting of directors proceeded withMarch 24, 2010, the Board of Directors conducted its annual evaluation of the independence of its membersdirectors’ independence. Based on March 28, 2006.  At this meeting,evaluation, the board ofBoard considered the following directors confirmed the independence of Messrs.to be independent: Jean Azema,Azéma, Daniel Bouton, Pierre-André de Chalendar, Jean-François Dehecq, Augustin de Romanet de Beaune, Jean-Marc Espalioux, Arthur Laffer, Francis Mayer, BaudoinPaul-Louis Girardot, Baudouin Prot, Paolo Scaroni, Louis Schweitzer and Murray Stuart and qualified as independent Mr. Jean-François Dehecq, who was appointed byEsther Koplowitz.



128



Back to Contents


With regard to the shareholders meeting of May 11, 2006.

Mr. Philippe Kourilsky was not requalified as independent director by the board of directors as he has exercised the position of scientific consultant at the Institutbanking relationships between Veolia Environnement since September 1, 2005.  As for our existing relationships with Société Générale and BNP Paribas, of which Mssrs. Daniel BoutonBaudouin Prot is a director and Baudoin Prot are respectively chief executive officers,Chief Executive Officer, the boardBoard of directors deemedDirectors considered that Veolia Environnement’s solid financial position, the Company’s financial situation, its independence with regard tofact that it does not rely on bank financing and the Company’s limited nature of the Company’s commitments with these banksstake in that bank’s business activities enabled it to consider these board members to bethat Baudouin Prot is an independent withindirector on the board of directors.  

On March 29, 2007, the board of directors conducted its annual evaluation of board members’ independence, and concluded that Mr. Azéma, Mr. Bouton, Mr. Dehecq, Mr.Espalioux, Mr. Prot, Mr. Schweitzer and Mr.Stuart listed above continued to satisfy the board’s independence criteria, as well as Mr. Paolo Scaroni, appointed by the board of directors on December 12, 2006 and whose nomination was




Back to contents



ratified by the shareholders’ meeting of May 10, 2007.  Our board of directors has postponed the evaluation of independence of Mr.Company’s Board. Augustin de Romanet de Beaune newly appointed, until a later meeting.was deemed to be independent due to the fact that Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations has been charged with making investments that are of public benefit, in particular in the environmental services sector. Lastly, Paul-Louis Girardot was deemed to be independent due to the time that has elapsed since he left his position as Chief Executive Officer of the former lead company of what is now the Water Division. The other directors deemed to be independent do not have any business relations with the Company, or do not have significant business relations that are likely to compromise their ability to exercise their judgment objectively.

Accordingly, our boardBoard of directorsDirectors has eighteleven independent members as of the date of filing of this annual report on Form 20-F.

Compensation

Director compensationDirectors may takebe compensated in one of two forms: directors'ways: directors’ fees paid for attending meetings of our boardBoard of directorsDirectors (jetons de présence), which are set by our company’sCompany’s annual shareholders’ meeting, and thewhose allocation of which is determined by our boardBoard of directorsDirectors pursuant to recommendations of the nominationsNominations and compensation committee,Compensation Committee, and exceptional compensation, which may be awarded by the boardBoard of directorsDirectors under conditions set by law.

On May 11, 2006, pursuant to a proposalThe amount of the board of directors,1 the combined shareholders’ meeting voted to increase the directors’ fees to be allocated amongpaid in 2009 and their division between the members of the boardBoard of directorsDirectors are described and detailed in a table under “Compensation – Board of 600,000 to € 770,000.  This increase was designed in particular to align our practices with those of other companies included in the CAC 40 that are listed in the U.S.

Directors Compension”. No exceptional compensation was awarded to directors in 2006.2009.

FunctioningOperations and activity in 20062009

The chairman of our board of directors organizes and supervises the work of the board, on which he reports to shareholders.  The chairman is also responsible for supervising our corporate bodies and, in particular, ensuring that directors are capable of fulfilling their duties.  

Directors may participate in boardBoard deliberations throughby videoconference or telecommunication.2 Theyother means of telecommunications, in accordance with the requirements of Articles L. 225-37 and R. 225-21 of the French Commercial Code and as provided by the internal rules and regulations of the Board of Directors. In such case, directors are deemed present for purposesthe purpose of calculating the quorum and majority, requirements when participating through such means, except whenwith regard to the vote on certain importantmajor decisions are made as set forth under applicableprovided by law (e.g., establishmentand by the Board’s internal rules (in particular, the preparation of the annual statutoryfinancial statements, the management report and the consolidated financial statementsstatements). This option was used at ten Board meetings in 2009 (compared with four meetings in 2008).

According to its internal rules and management report). In 2006, two directors participated in board deliberations through videoconference (each for one meetingregulations, the Company’s Board of the board of directors).

The charter of our board of directors calls for the boardDirectors is required to meet at least four times per year. During the 20062009 fiscal year, the board of directorsBoard met eightfourteen times including two special meetings, one devoted(compared to a strategic operation and the second to a significant acquisition.

seven times in 2008). On average, Board meetings last betweenlasted two and three hours, on average, which allowsthereby allowing for a thorough examination and discussion of itemsthe matters of business on the agenda. The average attendance levelrate at boardBoard meetings in 20062009 was approximately 73%85.9% (compared to 80.6% in 2008).

In 2006,2009, the Board of Directors was regularly informed of the Group’s financial situation and monitored the sale of assets program and the efficiency plan set up notably as a result of the deterioration of the position of the Environmental Services Division at the end of the 2008 fiscal year. Furthermore, during the second six months of the year, the Board met regularly in additionorder to conduct an in-depth review of changes to be made to the Company’s governance in light of the appointment of Mr. Henri Proglio as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of EDF and to discuss his replacement as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. On issues of corporate governance, the Board’s work focused, in particular, on the adoption and implementation of the AFEP-MEDEF code, as amended in 2008, the termination of the employment contract of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer an d then of the Chief Executive Officer, the separation of the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and providing legaltermination compensation to the Chief Executive Officer, the creation of the position of Vice-Chairman, setting the compensation of the Chairman and financial authorizations,Chief Executive Officer and, then, of the boardChairman and of the Chief Executive Officer individually after this position was separated into two positions, the corporate officer’s compensation policy and the examination of the Executive Committee’s one, evaluating the independence of directors, primarily addressedevaluating internal controls and approving the following subjects, among others: corporate governance (evaluation of board members’ independence, chairmanChairman’s report, distributing directors’ fees to directors and chief executive officer compensation and allocationrevising the rules for distributing the variable portion of directors’ fees renewal inand revising the make-upinternal rules and regulations of the boardBoard and of directors and appointmentits Committees.

In 2009, the Board of a director, discussion of improvements inDirectors’ other activities also focused on the board’s functioning and creation offollowing matters: the strategic committee for research, innovation and sustainable development),budget, the annual and half-yearsemi-annual financial statements, analysis ofobtaining information on the implementation of IFRIC interpretation project D12/D13/D14 relatingfinancial statements for the first and third quarters, the Group’s financing policy, the resolutions to be submitted to the accounting treatment of concessions, consolidated budgetannual combined general shareholders’ meeting, giving its opinion on the Company’s policy with regard to incentive plans for 2007, approval of significant financial transactions, divisions’ activities presentations (energy sectorthe Group’s managers and transportation business)corporate officers (stock options, free shares), 2006 stock options plan, employee savings pla ns and sharea capital increase reserved forto employees, (Group Savings Plan). In addition, the board of directors devoted one meetinggranting financial and legal authorizations to the review ofChairman and Chief Executive Officer and to the our strategy, inChief Executive Officer and the form of a presentationrenewal thereof. The Board examined the Group’s significant transactions and, analysis of long-term plan.when necessary, granted the required authorizations.



129



Back to Contents


Board Evaluation

Under our charter, our board of directorsOnce a year, the Board is required to evaluateinclude on its workagenda an evaluation of its operations prepared by the Nominations and procedures each year, in order to improveCompensation Committee and a discussion of its operations for the purpose of improving its efficiency, verifyensuring that important mattersissues are adequately prepared and discussed withinduring Board meetings and assessing the board and measure the contributionactual contributions of each board member.member to the Board’s work.

In addition, our board’sthe Board’s internal charter providesrules and regulations provide that a formal evaluation of its functioningoperations must occurbe carried out every three years by an outside organization, under the direction of an independent directorthe Nominations and an outside consultant, if necessary. This formal evaluation is meant to verifyCompensation Committee for the purpose of ensuring that our board is conducting its work in accordance with its charter, and to identify ways in which functioning and performance can be improved.

The first formal evaluation occurred during the first quarter of 2004,Board complies with the preliminary analysis being conductedprinciples governing its operations and studying proposals intended to improve its operations and efficiency. Each year, the Nominations and Compensation Committee provides the Board of Directors with a report evaluating the performances of the Chairman and of the directors, as well as the actions of executive management, which the Board discusses.

In 2009, an informal evaluation of the operations of the Board and its Committees was carried out under the supervisiondirection of the chairmanChairman of the nominationsNominations and compensation committee. A detailed questionnaire and individual interviews withCompensation Committee by sending directors served as the basis for the preliminary analysis, the results of which were presented in detail by the committee and debated at the board of directors’ meeting held on June 22, 2004.  During the same meeting, our board of directors also evaluated the performance of our company’s management on the basis of the nominations and compensation committee’s report. The functioning of the board of directors, its committees and executive management was considered to be satisfactory as a whole by our directors.  However, certain areas were targeted for improvement.  These areas included developing more presentations regarding our group’s operating activities, expanding information related to competition, corporate strategy and research and development, and increasing the frequency of information concerning cash flows, off-balance sheet commitments and risk management. The board of directors had decided not to create any new committees or restructure any existing committees at this time, but examined the possibility of strengthening the accounts and audit committee.  This measure was implemented beginning on April 1, 2005 by the appointment of an additional member of the accounts and audit committee while a member of the nominations and compensation committee was replaced.  

1

Based on a proposal made by the nominations and compensation committee to the board of directors on March 28, 2006.

2

Under conditions set forth in the decree of March 23, 1967, as amended. This ability is provided for in the internal regulations of the board of directors, which allows board members to participate in board meetings by videoconference and any other manner permitted by applicable law.




Back to contents



In 2005, at its meeting of March 29, the board of directors reserved part of its agenda to a discussion of the progress made in improving its functioning, in particular regarding the contents and frequency of information reported to directors. In this regard, in addition to informing it of important information immediately, management began to provide it with a detailed description of our group’s activities, market trends and other initiatives on a semi-annual basis.

In 2006, the board of directors devoted part of its agenda on December 12 to a review and debate over its functioning. Prior to this discussion, the chairman of the nominations and compensation committee sent a questionnaire to each director, the answers to whichquestionnaire. The responses were analyzed and then presented to the board.  OurBoard of Directors at its meeting of December 17, 2009. The Board adopted the following conclusions:

The directors believeconsidered that they had the information necessary for effective participation. Nevertheless, possible improvements were suggested: providing a clear improvementview of future outlook through more frequent forecasts and focusing on the quality of financial information concerning expected results; providing better summaries of financial information, focusing on essential points and/or questions asked or issues to be resolved; ensuring better communication in its functioning occurred sinceterms of frequency and content between meetings; improved reports to the first formal evaluation conducted in 2004.  However,Board on oversight of decisions made, and extend the duration of one or two meetings a year to deepen the strategy.

The organization and operations of the Board (frequency of meetings, attendance of Board members, scheduling, minutes) were deemed satisfactory.

On the whole, the directors did expressconsidered the need for more time to consider certain specific subjects (strategy, major acquisitions) in order to have a deeper understandingcomposition of subjectsthe Board to be satisfactory, provided an independent female director was found (it should be noted that Esther Koplowitz was appointed to the Board after this evaluation was carried out) and the balance between financial and industrial directors on the Board was maintained. The distribution of directors’ fees was deemed satisfactory and required no particular comment.

All directors considered during boardthat the Committees fulfill their duties. The operation of the Committees (information provided, frequency of meetings, access to executive management) was deemed satisfactory. It was nevertheless requested that the Accounts and asAudit Committee make a specific presentation concerning risks and the case may be, to prepare questions. They alsocontrol thereof.

Lastly, the composition of the Committees was deemed satisfactory (expertise, number, independence). Nevertheless, it was suggested that at a meetingan additional member be appointed to the Accounts and discussion regarding our company’s strategy should be carried out at least once a year, whenAudit Committee and to the need arises with the directors of our group’s divisions,Nominations and that more time be consecrated to this subject. Finally, the directors asked to have annual or biannual presentations regarding competition and an improvement in the presentation of our company’s financial criteria (treasury, or group’s indebtedness and capital resources) in comparison with the same criteria or financial aggregate held by similar groups.  Compensation Committee.

The next formal evaluationBoard will take place during 2007.be provided with a report on progress made on these points.



130



Back to Contents


Information Available to Directors

Chairman of Soficot SAS


The chairman supplies directors with timely information allowing them to fully exercise their duties, and communicates to directors in a continuous manner all significant information concerning our company. Each director may request and receive any information necessary to carry out his duties, and may receive additional training concerning our group and its activities if he so desires.  Baudouin Prot*

As requested by the members of our board of directors, management strives to deliver documents to be used in board meetings in a timely fashion to directors and communicate without delay any material information concerning our group, including communication between board meetings.

In 2006, the board of directors was periodically informed of our company’s financial situation, cash flows and off-balance sheet commitments primarily through reports by the accounts and audit committee.  In addition, the board of directors pre-approved all material financing transactions in accordance with its charter.

In order to perform their duties, directors may meet with the Company’s principal executive officers upon prior notice to the chairman of the board of directors. As a result, our group’s senior executive vice-president regularly participates in board meetings. In addition, heads of divisions are periodically invited to attend board meeting specifically devoted to their areas of activity.  For instance, following a presentation by the head of the water division in December 2004, the head of Veolia Propreté participated at a board meeting held in July 2005, at which he gave a detailed presentation on this division’s operating activities, strategy and competitors. Similar presentations were made by the heads of our Energy Services and Transportation divisions at board meetings held on July 6 and December 12, 2006.Age 58

DutiesDate of Directorsfirst appointment:

The charter of the board of directors provides that each of our directors is bound by a number of duties and obligations, such as: (i) a duty to act in the corporate interest of our company, (ii) an obligation to inform the board of directors of any existing or potential conflict of interests and to abstain from voting in any situation where such a conflict of interests exists, as well as an obligation to inform the chairman of the board of any agreement entered into by our company or on our behalf in which he has any direct or indirect interest, (iii) a duty of professional secrecy, and (iv) an obligation to comply with our company’s insider trading policy.

Each director receives a “Director’s Guide” containing the following documents: our company’s articles of association, the list of powers of the chairman and chief executive officer, the charter of the board of directors, the charters of the accounts and audit committee and the nominations and compensation committee, the rules to be followed by directors for reporting trades in our company’s shares, and a copy of our company’s ethics program entitled “Ethics, Commitment and Responsibility”.  Further, the “Director’s Guide” is updated as appropriate.

Regarding insider trading, directors must report trades in our company’s shares to the AMF and to Veolia Environnement, and must comply in general with the provisions of article L.621-18-2 of theCode monétaire et financier.  The procedures and modalities of this reporting are repeated in our company’s code of conduct regarding trading of shares.04/30/2003

PowersRenewal of term :05/07/2009

Expiration of term:

2011

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors

Under French law and our company’s articles of association, the board of directors has broad powers to act on behalf of our company within its corporate purposes and to define and implement our company’s policies, subject to those powers expressly granted by law or our company’s articles of association to our shareholders. The board of directors can address any issue relating to our company’s affairs.

In addition to the powers that the board of directors disposes of by law, company rules require the chief executive officer to seek out prior board approval for certain significant decisions.  These internal limits are described in more detail below in the paragraphs devoted to management.

Board Members

The following table sets forth the names and ages of the current members of our board of directors, the date of their first appointment, or renewal, as the case may be, to the board and the date of expiration of their current term, their current principal business




Back to contents



activities conducted outside of our company. All positions and offices of our directors indicated below are given as of January 31, 2007, excluding those of Mr. de Romanet de Beaune, appointed by our board of directors on March 29, 2007. Directors may be contacted at our headquarters, located at 36/38 avenue Kléber, 75116 Paris.


Henri Proglio

Age 58

Date of first appointment:
4/30/2003

Expiration of term:
2009

Principal Function within our Company:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

None.

Jean Azéma*

Age 54

Date of first appointment:
4/30/2003

Expiration of term:
2009

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive Officer of Groupama International





Back to contents




Daniel Bouton*

Age 57

Date of first appointment:
4/30/2003

Expiration of term:
2012

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Nominations and Compensation Committee since April 1, 2005

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Société Générale

Jean- François Dehecq*(1)

Age 67

Date of first appointment:
5/11/2006

Expiration of term:
2012

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Sanofi-Aventis

Augustin de Romanet de Beaune

Age 45

Date of first appointment:
3/29/20071

Expiration of term:
2012

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive Officer of Caisse des Dépots et Consignations


1 The appointment of Mr. de Romanet de Beaune to replace Mr. Mayer was decided by the board of directors of the Company on March 29, 2007 and was ratified by the shareholders’ meeting held on May 10,2007.




Back to contents




Jean-Marc Espalioux*

Age 55

Date of first appointment:
4/30/2003

Renewal of term :5/11/2006

Expiration of term:
2012

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Accounts and Audit Committee since April 30, 2003

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman and chief executive officer of Financière Agache Investissement

Paul-Louis Girardot

Age 73

Date of first appointment: 4/30/2003

Renewal of term :5/11/2006

Expiration of term:
2012

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Accounts and Audit Committee since April 1, 2005

Member of the strategic research, innovation and sustainable development committee since September 14, 2006

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Veolia Eau

Philippe Kourilsky

Age 64

Date of first appointment: 4/30/2003

Expiration of term:
2009

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Chairman of the strategic research, innovation and sustainable development committee since September 14, 2006

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Professor at the Collège de France.





Back to contents




Serge Michel

Age 80

Date of first appointment: 4/30/2003

Renewal of term:
5/11/2006

Expiration of term:
2012

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

President of the Nominations and Remuneration Committee since April 30,2003

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Director and Chief Executive Officer of BNP Paribas


Georges Ralli

Age 61

Date of first appointment:

04/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/11/2006

Expiration of term:

2010

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive of European Investment Banking Business of Lazard Group LLC (USA)

Chief Executive Officer Vice President and Managing Partner of Lazard Frères Gestion SAS


Paolo Scaroni*

Age 63

Date of first appointment:

12/12/2006

Renewal of term :05/07/2009

Expiration of term:

2013

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive Officer of ENI (Italy)


*

Independent directors.




125



Back to Contents


Henri Proglio is a graduate of the Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales (HEC). He joined Compagnie Générale des Eaux in 1972 and was appointed Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of CGEA in 1990. He was appointed Executive Vice-President of Vivendi Universal and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Vivendi Water in 1999. He became Chairman of Veolia Environnement’s Management Board in 2000 and Chairman of the Board of Directors and was Chief Executive Officer from April 2003 to November 27, 2009, on which date he was appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement following his appointment as Chairman and Managing Director of Electricité de France (EDF) by decree of the President of the French Republic issued during the Ministerial Council meeting of November 25, 2009.

Louis Schweitzer is a graduate of the Institut d’Etudes Politiques (IEP) in Paris and of the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA) and was a financial controller in the Treasury department. From 1981 to 1986, he was chief of staff for Laurent Fabius (who was successively junior Budget Minister, Minister for Industry and Research and Prime Minister). In 1986, he joined Renault’s senior management and then successively held the positions of director of planning and management control, Chief Finance Officer and Executive Vice-President. He was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Renault in December 1990, then Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in May 1992 until April 29, 2005, when he was appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors of Renault. Louis Schweitzer did not wish to seek the renewal of his term of office as Director of Renault during the annu al general meeting held on May 6, 2009. He was appointed Vice Chairman of the Veolia Environnement Board of Directors on November 27, 2009.

Jean Azéma holds an engineering degree from the Ecole Supérieure d’Agriculture de Purpan (ESAP), as well as a degree from the Centre National d’Etudes Supérieures de Sécurité Sociale (CNESS). He began his career at Union Départementale de la Mutualité Agricole des Pyrénées Orientales in 1975, moved to the Centre National d’Etudes Supérieures de la Sécurité Sociale from 1978 to 1979, and to the Union Départementale de la Mutualité Agricole of Allier from 1979 to 1987. From 1987 to 1995, Mr. Azéma served as financial director of Groupama Vie, investments director for Groupama, account management and consolidation director at Caisse Centrale des Assurances Mutuelles Agricoles (CCAMA) and insurance director at CCAMA. In 1996, he was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Groupama Sud-Ou est, in 1998, Chief Executive Officer of Groupama Sud and in June 2000, Chief Executive Officer of Groupama. Jean Azéma is currently Chief Executive Officer of Groupama SA and of Fédération Nationale Groupama, Chairman of the Fédération Française des Sociétés d’Assurance Mutuelles and deputy Chairman of Fédération Française des Sociétés d’Assurance.

Daniel Bouton holds a degree in political science, is a graduate of the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA) and is a former financial controller in the Treasury department. He has held a number of positions in the French Ministry of Economy, Finance and Industry, including that of budget director, between 1988 and 1991. In 1991, he began working at Société Générale, serving as Chief Executive Officer starting in 1993, and as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer starting in 1997. He was appointed to the position of Chairman of the Board of Directors of Société Générale in May 2008, then resigned from his duties of Director and President of the bank in May 2009. In November 2009, Daniel Bouton incorporated a consulting company, DMJB Conseil, of which he is the President.

Jean-François Dehecq is a graduate of the Ecole Nationale des Arts et Métiers. After having been a mathematics teacher from 1964 to 1965 at the Saint-Vincent de Senlis Catholic high school, he became a scientific research intern in the army’s nuclear propulsion department. In 1965, he joined the Société Nationale des Pétroles d’Aquitaine (SNPA, which later became Elf Aquitaine). After four years in the economics department (1965 to 1969), he became executive assistant (1969 to 1970), and then operations engineer (1970 to 1971) at the Lacq plant, a major gas production site in France. In 1973, he became Chief Executive Officer of Sanofi, a major division of Elf Aquitaine. From 1982 to 1988, he was deputy Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Sanofi before assuming full management authority in February 1988. In 1999, he became Chairma n and Chief Executive Officer of Sanofi Synthelabo and, in 2004, organized the Sanofi-Aventis merger. Since 2007, Jean-François Dehecq has been the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Sanofi-Aventis.

Pierre-André de Chalendar is a graduate of ESSEC and the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA). He holds the rank of Government Finance Inspector. In November 1989, he joined Compagnie de Saint Gobain where he held various positions, before being appointed Deputy Chief Executive Officer in May 2005, Director in June 2006 then Chief Executive Officer of Compagnie de Saint Gobain since June 2007.



126



Back to Contents


Augustin de Romanet de Beaune is a graduate of the Institut d’Etudes Politiques (IEP) in Paris and of the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA). He began his career in the budget department of the French Ministry of Economy and Finance. In 1990, he was a finance attaché with France’s permanent mission to the European Community in Brussels, before returning to the budget department in 1993 as head of the budgetary analysis and policy office. In 1995, he became a technical advisor in the office of the Minister of the Economy and Finance, and then chief of staff to the junior Budget Minister. After having been a budgetary advisor to the deputy Budget Minister, government press secretary and project leader with the French Ministry of Economy and Finance from 1995 to 1997, Augustin de Romanet de Beaune became deputy director and project leader with the office of the budget director, then deputy director charged with the transportation sector in the budget department. In 1999 and 2000, he was successively appointed manager of Oddo et Compagnie and managing partner of Oddo Pinatton Corporate. In 2002, Augustin de Romanet de Beaune was appointed to the position of chief of staff of the deputy Budget and Budgetary Reform Minister and deputy chief of staff of the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Industry. From 2004 to 2005, he held the positions of chief of staff of the Minister of Employment, Labor and Social Cohesion, deputy chief of staff of the Prime Minister and deputy Secretary General to the Presidency of the Republic. After having been finance and strategy vice-president and a member of the Executive Committee of the Crédit Agricole Group since October 2006, Augustin de Romanet de Beaune was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations in March 2007.

Jean-Marc Espalioux holds degrees in political science, law and economics and is an alumnus of the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA). He was a financial controller in the Treasury department from 1978 to 1983. He joined Compagnie Générale des Eaux in 1984, becoming Chief Finance Officer in 1987 and Executive Vice-President in 1996. Jean-Marc Espalioux was a director of the Accor group from 1987 to 1996 and Chairman of the management board from 1997 to 2006. Jean-Marc Espalioux has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Financière Agache Private Equity since July 2006.

Paul-Louis Girardot was a director and Chief Executive Officer of Vivendi until 1998. He focused principally on developing the Veolia Environnement Group’s utilities concessions, particularly in the Water sector. In addition, he contributed significantly to Vivendi’s activities in the telephone sector, in particular mobile telephones. He also worked to expand the Veolia Environnement Group’s business in the Energy Services sector and in the decentralized production of electric power (cogeneration), through the Dalkia subsidiary. Paul-Louis Girardot has been Chairman of the supervisory board of Veolia Eau-Compagnie Générale des Eaux since 2001.

Ms. Esther Koplowitz (Marquise de Casa Peñalver) is the President of the Esther Koplowitz Foundation, which she created herself. Exclusively financed by contributions from its founder, the Esther Koplowitz Foundation is intended, firstly, to provide social and healthcare assistance to seniors, to the physically and mentally handicapped, to minors, and to people with problems of social integration or threatened with exclusion for physical, social or cultural reasons and, secondly, to support research. Since the time of its creation, the Esther Koplowitz Foundation has donated more than EUR 100 million, mainly devoted to building and fitting out homes for the elderly and underprivileged suffering from severe physical or mental handicaps (seven centers) and to the creation of a the Esther Koplowitz Biomedical Research Center (CIBEK by its French acronym), which aspir es to set the standard in its field in Spain. In recognition of her commitment to the social and humanitarian sectors and to research funding, Ms. Koplowitz, a Spanish business leader, has won numerous awards, including the Grand Cross of Civil Merit from the Spanish government, The Golden Cross of the Civil Order of Social Solidarity, from Her Majesty the Queen of Spain, the Blanquerna Prize, from the regional government of Catalonia, the Arms of the City of Barcelona, the title of Honorary Citizen of the City of Valencia; the Silver Medal of the Valencian Council of Culture; the Gold Medal of the Regional Community of Madrid; the Grand Cross of Health of Madrid; the Imserso Infante Cristina Prize for Social Merit in 2008; the Gold and Diamond Insignia of the Foundation of the Orphans of the Spanish National Police Force; the Montblanc Prize for the best company manager of 2004; and, finally, the Business Leader of the Year Award, granted by the US-Spain Chamber of Commerce in 2007. Member of the supervisor y board of Veolia Environnement from 2000 to 2002, Ms. Koplowitz is also vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chairman of the strategic committee and majority shareholder of the Spanish company Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas (FCC) specializing in environmental services, renewable energies, infrastructures and cement. She is also Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors of Cementos Portland Valderrivas, member of the Board of Directors of WRG (U.K.), ASA (Austria) and Alpine (Austria), as well as Chairman of the Board of Directors of B-1998, S.L. For several years now, Veolia Environnement and F.C.C. have jointly held a subsidiary, Proactiva Medio Ambiente S.A., present in Latin America.

Philippe Kourilsky is a graduate of the Ecole Polytechnique, and holds a doctorate in sciences from the University of Paris. He has devoted his career to life sciences research. He has held numerous management positions in the public and private research sectors, and in particular was the Director of Research at the CNRS and Director General of the Institut Pasteur from 2000 to 2005. Philippe Kourilsky is currently a professor at the Collège de France, a member of the Académie des Sciences and holds honorary doctorates from several foreign universities.



127



Back to Contents


Serge Michel has spent his entire career in the construction and public works sector. After having held the position of Executive Vice-President with the Compagnie de Saint-Gobain group and been Chairman of Socea, he chaired the SGE group until 1991 and the CISE group until 1997. He was Executive Vice-President of the Compagnie Générale des Eaux until 1992. He is currently Chairman of Soficot, a business management and investment consulting company he founded in 1997.

Baudouin Prot is a graduate of the Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales (HEC) and of the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA). From 1974 to 1983, he was successively the deputy to the prefect of the Franche-Comté region, financial controller in the Treasury department and deputy to the energy and raw materials director general in the Ministry of Industry. He joined Banque Nationale de Paris in 1983, where he held various positions before being appointed Executive Vice-President in 1992 and Chief Executive Officer in 1996. After having been appointed director and Executive Vice-President of BNP Paribas in March 2000, he has been a director and Chief Executive Officer of BNP Paribas since June 2003.

Georges Ralli holds a graduate degree (DESS) in banking and finance from the University of Paris-V and is a graduate of the Institut d’Etudes Politiques (IEP) in Paris and of the Institut Commercial in Nancy. In 1970, he joined Crédit Lyonnais, where he held various management positions until 1981. In 1982, he served as secretary of the Savings Development and Protection Commission. From 1982 to 1985, he headed the financial negotiations department of Crédit du Nord. He joined Lazard in 1986, and became managing partner in 1993 and jointly headed the mergers and acquisitions department of Lazard LLC starting in 1999. Since 2000, Georges Ralli has been Deputy Chairman and a member of the Executive Committee of Lazard LLC (United States). Since 2006, he has been the Co-Chairman of the European Investment Banking Committee of the Lazard Group LLC (United St ates) and a member of the European Advisory Board. He was head of Maison française from 2006 to 2009. He currently manages the European M&A activities (Chairman of Maison Lazard) and Asset Management activities (President of Lazard Frères Gestion).

Paolo Scaroni holds a degree in economics from Bocconi University in Milan and an MBA from Columbia Business School in New York. After having spent a year with McKinsey & Company following his MBA, between 1973 and 1985, he held various positions with Saint Gobain, ultimately heading the “flat glass” division. In 1985, Paolo Scaroni became Chief Executive Officer of Techint, while at the same time holding the positions of deputy Chairman of Falck and Executive Vice-President of SIV, a joint venture between Techint and Pilkington plc. He became Chief Executive Officer of Pilkington plc in 1996, a position he held until May 2002. He was Chief Executive Officer of Enel from 2002 to 2005 and in June 2005 became Chief Executive Officer of Eni, a position he still holds.

Evaluation of the independence of directors

As defined by the Board of Directors’ internal rules and regulations, an independent director is a director who does not have any relationship with the Company, its Group or its management that could compromise his ability to exercise his judgment objectively. The criteria in the internal rules and regulations for determining directors’ independence are in accordance with the recommendations of the AFEP-MEDEF corporate governance code.

These criteria are evaluated and weighted by the Board of Directors, which can determine that despite the fact that a director does not meet the criteria set forth in the internal rules and regulations, a director can nevertheless be considered to be independent in light of his specific situation or that of the Company, taking into account its shareholders or any other reason. Conversely, the Board of Directors can determine that a director is not independent despite the fact that he meets the criteria set forth in the internal rules and regulations.

The internal rules and regulations also require that, each year, before the publication of the reference document, the Board of Directors evaluate the independence of each of its members on the basis of the criteria contained in said rules and regulations, specific circumstances, the positions of the relevant director, the Company and the Group and the opinion of the Nominations and Compensation Committee.

After reviewing the opinion of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, at its meeting of March 24, 2010, the Board of Directors conducted its annual evaluation of the directors’ independence. Based on this evaluation, the Board considered the following directors to be independent: Jean Azéma, Daniel Bouton, Pierre-André de Chalendar, Jean-François Dehecq, Augustin de Romanet de Beaune, Jean-Marc Espalioux, Paul-Louis Girardot, Baudouin Prot, Paolo Scaroni, Louis Schweitzer and Esther Koplowitz.



128



Back to Contents


With regard to the banking relationships between Veolia Environnement and BNP Paribas, of which Baudouin Prot is a director and Chief Executive Officer, the Board of Directors considered that Veolia Environnement’s solid financial position, the fact that it does not rely on bank financing and the Company’s limited stake in that bank’s business activities enabled it to consider that Baudouin Prot is an independent director on the Company’s Board. Augustin de Romanet de Beaune was deemed to be independent due to the fact that Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations has been charged with making investments that are of public benefit, in particular in the environmental services sector. Lastly, Paul-Louis Girardot was deemed to be independent due to the time that has elapsed since he left his position as Chief Executive Officer of the former lead company of what is now the Water Division. The other directors deemed to be independent do not have any business relations with the Company, or do not have significant business relations that are likely to compromise their ability to exercise their judgment objectively.

Accordingly, our Board of Directors has eleven independent members as of the date of this annual report on Form 20-F.

Compensation

Directors may be compensated in one of two ways: directors’ fees paid for attending meetings of our Board of Directors (jetons de présence), which are set by our Company’s annual shareholders’ meeting, and whose allocation is determined by our Board of Directors pursuant to recommendations of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, and exceptional compensation, which may be awarded by the Board of Directors under conditions set by law.

The amount of directors’ fees paid in 2009 and their division between the members of the Board of Directors are described and detailed in a table under “Compensation – Board of Directors Compension”. No exceptional compensation was awarded to directors in 2009.

Operations and activity in 2009

Directors may participate in Board deliberations by videoconference or other means of telecommunications, in accordance with the requirements of Articles L. 225-37 and R. 225-21 of the French Commercial Code and as provided by the internal rules and regulations of the Board of Directors. In such case, directors are deemed present for the purpose of calculating the quorum and majority, except with regard to the vote on certain major decisions as provided by law and by the Board’s internal rules (in particular, the preparation of the annual financial statements, the management report and the consolidated financial statements). This option was used at ten Board meetings in 2009 (compared with four meetings in 2008).

According to its internal rules and regulations, the Company’s Board of Directors is required to meet at least four times per year. During the 2009 fiscal year, the Board met fourteen times (compared to seven times in 2008). On average, Board meetings lasted two hours, thereby allowing for a thorough examination and discussion of the matters of business on the agenda. The average attendance rate at Board meetings in 2009 was 85.9% (compared to 80.6% in 2008).

In 2009, the Board of Directors was regularly informed of the Group’s financial situation and monitored the sale of assets program and the efficiency plan set up notably as a result of the deterioration of the position of the Environmental Services Division at the end of the 2008 fiscal year. Furthermore, during the second six months of the year, the Board met regularly in order to conduct an in-depth review of changes to be made to the Company’s governance in light of the appointment of Mr. Henri Proglio as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of EDF and to discuss his replacement as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. On issues of corporate governance, the Board’s work focused, in particular, on the adoption and implementation of the AFEP-MEDEF code, as amended in 2008, the termination of the employment contract of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer an d then of the Chief Executive Officer, the separation of the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and providing termination compensation to the Chief Executive Officer, the creation of the position of Vice-Chairman, setting the compensation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and, then, of the Chairman and of the Chief Executive Officer individually after this position was separated into two positions, the corporate officer’s compensation policy and the examination of the Executive Committee’s one, evaluating the independence of directors, evaluating internal controls and approving the Chairman’s report, distributing directors’ fees to directors and revising the rules for distributing the variable portion of directors’ fees and revising the internal rules and regulations of the Board and of its Committees.

In 2009, the Board of Directors’ other activities also focused on the following matters: the budget, the annual and semi-annual financial statements, obtaining information on the financial statements for the first and third quarters, the Group’s financing policy, the resolutions to be submitted to the annual combined general shareholders’ meeting, giving its opinion on the Company’s policy with regard to incentive plans for the Group’s managers and corporate officers (stock options, free shares), a capital increase reserved to employees, granting financial and legal authorizations to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and to the Chief Executive Officer and the renewal thereof. The Board examined the Group’s significant transactions and, when necessary, granted the required authorizations.



129



Back to Contents


Board Evaluation

Once a year, the Board is required to include on its agenda an evaluation of its operations prepared by the Nominations and Compensation Committee and a discussion of its operations for the purpose of improving its efficiency, ensuring that important issues are adequately prepared and discussed during Board meetings and assessing the actual contributions of each member to the Board’s work.

In addition, the Board’s internal rules and regulations provide that a formal evaluation of its operations must be carried out every three years by an outside organization, under the direction of the Nominations and Compensation Committee for the purpose of ensuring that the Board complies with the principles governing its operations and studying proposals intended to improve its operations and efficiency. Each year, the Nominations and Compensation Committee provides the Board of Directors with a report evaluating the performances of the Chairman and of the directors, as well as the actions of executive management, which the Board discusses.

In 2009, an informal evaluation of the operations of the Board and its Committees was carried out under the direction of the Chairman of the Nominations and Compensation Committee by sending directors a detailed questionnaire. The responses were analyzed and then presented to the Board of Directors at its meeting of December 17, 2009. The Board adopted the following conclusions:

The directors considered that they had the information necessary for effective participation. Nevertheless, possible improvements were suggested: providing a view of future outlook through more frequent forecasts and focusing on the quality of financial information concerning expected results; providing better summaries of financial information, focusing on essential points and/or questions asked or issues to be resolved; ensuring better communication in terms of frequency and content between meetings; improved reports to the Board on oversight of decisions made, and extend the duration of one or two meetings a year to deepen the strategy.

The organization and operations of the Board (frequency of meetings, attendance of Board members, scheduling, minutes) were deemed satisfactory.

On the whole, the directors considered the composition of the Board to be satisfactory, provided an independent female director was found (it should be noted that Esther Koplowitz was appointed to the Board after this evaluation was carried out) and the balance between financial and industrial directors on the Board was maintained. The distribution of directors’ fees was deemed satisfactory and required no particular comment.

All directors considered that the Committees fulfill their duties. The operation of the Committees (information provided, frequency of meetings, access to executive management) was deemed satisfactory. It was nevertheless requested that the Accounts and Audit Committee make a specific presentation concerning risks and the control thereof.

Lastly, the composition of the Committees was deemed satisfactory (expertise, number, independence). Nevertheless, it was suggested that an additional member be appointed to the Accounts and Audit Committee and to the Nominations and Compensation Committee.

The Board will be provided with a report on progress made on these points.



130



Back to Contents


Chairman of Soficot SAS

Baudoin

Baudouin Prot*

Age 5558

Date of first appointment: 4/

04/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/07/2009

Expiration of term:
2009

2011

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the boardBoard of directorsDirectors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Director and Chief Executive Officer of BNP Paribas


Georges Ralli

Age 5861

Date of first appointment: 4/

04/30/2003

Renewal of term:
term :
5/05/11/2006

Expiration of term:
2012

2010

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the boardBoard of directorsDirectors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive of European Investment Banking Business of Lazard Group LLC (USA)

Chief Executive Officer Vice President and Managing Partner of Lazard FreresFrères Gestion SAS





Back to contents





Paolo Scaroni*

Age 6063

Date of first appointment:

12/12/20061

Renewal of term :05/07/2009

Expiration of term:
2009

2013

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the boardBoard of directorsDirectors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of ENI (Italy)

Louis Schweitzer*

Age 64*

Date of first appointmentIndependent directors.: 4/30/2003

Expiration of term:
2009

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Nominations and Compensation Committee since April 30, 2003

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman of the Board of Directors of Renault

Murray Stuart*

Age 73

Date of first appointment: 4/30/2003

Renewal of term:
5/11/2006

Expiration of term:
2012

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Chairman of the Accounts and Audit Committee since April 30, 2003

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

None

________________

*

Independent directors.

(1)

Replaced Jacques Espinasse as a director as of the end of the shareholders’ meeting of May 11, 2006.


1 The appointment of Mr. Paolo Scaroni as the replacement for Mr. Laffer, decided by the board of directors of the Company on December 12, 2006, was ratified by the shareholders’ meeting held on May 10, 2007.



125



Back to contentsContents



Henri PROGLIOProglio is a graduate of the HEC business school in Paris.Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales (HEC). He joined Compagnie Générale des Eaux in 1972 and was appointed PresidentChairman and Chief Executive Officer of CGEA in 1990. He was appointed Executive Vice PresidentVice-President of Vivendi Universal and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Vivendi Water in 1999. He became Chairman of the Company’sVeolia Environnement’s Management Board in 2000 and Chairman of itsthe Board of Directors and was Chief Executive Officer from April 2003 to November 27, 2009, on which date he was appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement following his appointment as Chairman and Managing Director of Electricité de France (EDF) by decree of the President of the French Republic issued during the Ministerial Council meeting of November 25, 2009.

Louis Schweitzer is a graduate of the Institut d’Etudes Politiques (IEP) in Paris and of the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA) and was a financial controller in the Treasury department. From 1981 to 1986, he was chief of staff for Laurent Fabius (who was successively junior Budget Minister, Minister for Industry and Research and Prime Minister). In 1986, he joined Renault’s senior management and then successively held the positions of director of planning and management control, Chief Finance Officer and Executive Vice-President. He was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Renault in December 1990, then Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in May 1992 until April 2003.  29, 2005, when he was appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors of Renault. Louis Schweitzer did not wish to seek the renewal of his term of office as Director of Renault during the annu al general meeting held on May 6, 2009. He was appointed Vice Chairman of the Veolia Environnement Board of Directors on November 27, 2009.

Jean AZEMAAzéma holds an engineering degree from the Ecole Supérieure d’Agriculture de Purpan (ESAP), as well as a degree from the Centre National d’Etudes Supérieures de Sécurité Sociale (CNESS). He began his career at Caisse RégionaleUnion Départementale de la Mutualité Agricole des Pyrénées Orientales in 1975, moved to the Centre National d’Etudes Supérieures de la Sécurité Sociale from 19751978 to 1978,1979, and later worked at Caisse Régionaleto the Union Départementale de l’Allierla Mutualité Agricole of Allier from 1979 to 1987. From 1987 to 1995, Mr. Azéma served as financial director of Groupama Vie, investments director for Groupama, account management and consolidation director at Caisse Centrale des Assurances Mutuelles Agricoles (CCAMA) and insurance director of insurance at CCAMA. In 1996, he was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Groupama Southwest and,Sud-Ou est, in 1998, of Groupama South.  In June 2000, Mr. Azéma was appointed Chief Executive Officer of CCAMA.  He was elected the ChairmanGroupama Sud and in June 2000, Chief Executive Officer of the French Federation of Mutual Insurance Companies (Fédération Fra nçaise des Sociétés d’Assurance Mutuelle) in December 2001.  He has been theGroupama. Jean Azéma is currently Chief Executive Officer of Groupama SA and of Fédération Nationale Groupama, since June 2000.  


Chairman of the Fédération Française des Sociétés d’Assurance Mutuelles and deputy Chairman of Fédération Française des Sociétés d’Assurance.

Daniel BOUTONBouton holds a degree in political science, and is a graduate of the Ecole Nationale d'Administrationd’Administration (ENA). As part of and is a former financial controller in the French financial controllers’ civil service corps, he occupiedTreasury department. He has held a number of different positions in the French Ministry of Economy, Finance and Industry, including that of Budget Director,budget director, between 1988 and 1991. SinceIn 1991, he has workedbegan working at Société Générale, serving as Managing Director fromChief Executive Officer starting in 1993, to 1997, and as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from 1997starting in 1997. He was appointed to the present.position of Chairman of the Board of Directors of Société Générale in May 2008, then resigned from his duties of Director and President of the bank in May 2009. In November 2009, Daniel Bouton incorporated a consulting company, DMJB Conseil, of which he is the President.

Jean-François DEHECQDehecq graduated fromis a graduate of the Ecole Nationale des Arts et Métiers. After having been a mathematics professorteacher from 1964 to 1965 at the Lycée catholique Saint-Vincent de Senlis Catholic high school, he became a scientific research intern in the army’s nuclear propulsion department of the army.department. In 1965, he joined the Société Nationale des Pétroles d’Aquitaine (SNPA, exwhich later became Elf Aquitaine). After four years working forin the economics department (1965 to 1969), he became executive assistant (1969 to 1970), and then operations engineer (1970 to 1971) at the Plant in Lacq plant, a major site for gas supplyproduction site in France. In 1973, he became chief executive officerChief Executive Officer of Sanofi, an important parta major division of Elf Aquitaine. From 1982 to 1988, he was chairmandeputy Chairman and chief executive officerChief Executive Officer of Sanofi before taking chargeassuming full management authority in February 1988. In 1999, he became chairmanChairma n and chief executive officerChief Executive Officer of Sanofi Synthelabo. InSynthelabo and, in 2004, he organized the merger of Sanofi-Aventis. Mr.Sanofi-Aventis merger. Since 2007, Jean-François Dehecq is currently chairmanhas been the Chairman of the boardBoard of directorsDirectors of Sanofi-Aventis.

Augustin DE ROMANET DE BEAUNEPierre-André de Chalendar is a graduate of ESSEC and the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA). He holds the rank of Government Finance Inspector. In November 1989, he joined Compagnie de Saint Gobain where he held various positions, before being appointed Deputy Chief Executive Officer in May 2005, Director in June 2006 then Chief Executive Officer of Compagnie de Saint Gobain since June 2007.



126



Back to Contents


Augustin de Romanet de Beaune is a diploma fromgraduate of the Institut d’Etudes Politiques (IEP) in Paris and of the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA). He began his career as ain the budget director withindepartment of the French Ministry of EconomicsEconomy and Finance. In 1990, he was a finance attaché within the Frenchwith France’s permanent mission to the European Community in Brussels, before returning to the budget department in 1993 as chiefhead of the budgetary analysis and politics bureau.policy office. In 1995, he became a technical advisor withinin the Ministryoffice of Economicsthe Minister of the Economy and Finance, and technical consultant, followed bythen chief of staff ofto the budget secretary.junior Budget Minister. After having served asbeen a budgetary consultantadvisor to the deputy minister of budgets,Budget Minister, government spokespersonpress secretary and mission head withinproject leader with the French Ministry of EconomicsEconomy and Finance betweenfrom 1995 andto 1997, heAugustin de Romanet de Beaune became deputy director reporting toand project leader with the office of the budget director, then deputy director in charge ofcharged with the transportation sector reporting toin the budget director.department. In 1999 and 2000, he was named directorsuccessively appointed manager of Oddo et Compagnie and managing partner of Oddo Pinatton Corporate. In 2002, heAugustin de Romanet de Beaune was appointed to the position of chief of staff toof the deputy budget ministerBudget and assistantBudgetary Reform Minister and deputy chief of staff of the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Industry. From 2004 to 2005, he washeld the positions of chief of staff of the Minister of Employment, WorkLabor and Social Cohesion, and assistantdeputy chief of staff toof the Prime Minister and assistant secretary general fordeputy Secretary General to the PresidentPresidency of the Republic. After having served as assistant director ofbeen finance and strategy vice-president and asa member of the executive committeeExecutive Committee of Groupethe Crédit Agricole Group since October 2006, heAugustin de Romanet de Beaune was named chief executive officerappointed Chief Executive Officer of the Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations onin March 7, 2007.

Jean-Marc ESPALIOUXEspalioux holds degrees in political science, law and economics and is an alumnus of ENA and servedthe Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA). He was a financial controller in the French financial controllers’ civil service corpsTreasury department from 1978 to 1983. In 1984 heHe joined Compagnie Générale des Eaux where he served asin 1984, becoming Chief FinancialFinance Officer in 1987 and Executive Vice-President in 1996. Jean-Marc Espalioux was a director of the Accor group from 1987 to 1996 and as Deputy Managing Director from 1996 to 1997. Having been a director of Accor from 1987 to 1996, he served as Chairman of the Management Board of Accormanagement board from 1997 to 2006. Since July 2006, heJean-Marc Espalioux has been chairmanChairman and chief executive officerChief Executive Officer of Financière Agache Investissment.Private Equity since July 2006.

Paul-Louis GIRARDOTGirardotwas a Directordirector and the Chief Executive Officer of Vivendi until 1998. While there,He focused principally on developing the Veolia Environnement Group’s utilities concessions, particularly in the Water sector. In addition, he contributed greatlysignificantly to the development of itsVivendi’s activities in the area of telephonic communication,telephone sector, in particular radio-telephone. Currently, his work is principally focused on developingmobile telephones. He also worked to expand the Company’s outsourcingVeolia Environnement Group’s business in its water division. He has also assisted in Veolia Environnement’s developmentthe Energy Services sector and in the area of energy services and thedecentralized production of decentralized electricity (co-generation)electric power (cogeneration), through Dalkia. Hethe Dalkia subsidiary. Paul-Louis Girardot has been serving as the Chairman of the Supervisory Boardsupervisory board of Veolia Eau-Compagnie Générale des Eaux since 2001.



Ms. Esther Koplowitz


Back (Marquise de Casa Peñalver) is the President of the Esther Koplowitz Foundation, which she created herself. Exclusively financed by contributions from its founder, the Esther Koplowitz Foundation is intended, firstly, to contents



provide social and healthcare assistance to seniors, to the physically and mentally handicapped, to minors, and to people with problems of social integration or threatened with exclusion for physical, social or cultural reasons and, secondly, to support research. Since the time of its creation, the Esther Koplowitz Foundation has donated more than EUR 100 million, mainly devoted to building and fitting out homes for the elderly and underprivileged suffering from severe physical or mental handicaps (seven centers) and to the creation of a the Esther Koplowitz Biomedical Research Center (CIBEK by its French acronym), which aspir es to set the standard in its field in Spain. In recognition of her commitment to the social and humanitarian sectors and to research funding, Ms. Koplowitz, a Spanish business leader, has won numerous awards, including the Grand Cross of Civil Merit from the Spanish government, The Golden Cross of the Civil Order of Social Solidarity, from Her Majesty the Queen of Spain, the Blanquerna Prize, from the regional government of Catalonia, the Arms of the City of Barcelona, the title of Honorary Citizen of the City of Valencia; the Silver Medal of the Valencian Council of Culture; the Gold Medal of the Regional Community of Madrid; the Grand Cross of Health of Madrid; the Imserso Infante Cristina Prize for Social Merit in 2008; the Gold and Diamond Insignia of the Foundation of the Orphans of the Spanish National Police Force; the Montblanc Prize for the best company manager of 2004; and, finally, the Business Leader of the Year Award, granted by the US-Spain Chamber of Commerce in 2007. Member of the supervisor y board of Veolia Environnement from 2000 to 2002, Ms. Koplowitz is also vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chairman of the strategic committee and majority shareholder of the Spanish company Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas (FCC) specializing in environmental services, renewable energies, infrastructures and cement. She is also Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors of Cementos Portland Valderrivas, member of the Board of Directors of WRG (U.K.), ASA (Austria) and Alpine (Austria), as well as Chairman of the Board of Directors of B-1998, S.L. For several years now, Veolia Environnement and F.C.C. have jointly held a subsidiary, Proactiva Medio Ambiente S.A., present in Latin America.

Philippe KOURILSKYKourilskyis a graduate of the ÉcoleEcole Polytechnique, and holds a doctorate in France.sciences from the University of Paris. He joinedhas devoted his career to life sciences research. He has held numerous management positions in the public and private research sectors, and in particular was the Director of Research at the CNRS and Director General of the Institut Pasteur in 1972. Hefrom 2000 to 2005. Philippe Kourilsky is currently a professor at the Collège de France.France, a member of the Académie des Sciences and holds honorary doctorates from several foreign universities.



127



Back to Contents


Serge MICHELMichelhas spent his entire career in the construction and public works business,sector. After having served as Vice Presidentheld the position of Executive Vice-President with the Compagnie de Saint Gobain, Deputy Managing DirectorSaint-Gobain group and President of SOCEA,been Chairman of S.G.E.Socea, he chaired the SGE group until 1991 Chairmanand the CISE group until 1997. He was Executive Vice-President of CISE until 1997 and Deputy Managing Director ofthe Compagnie Générale des Eaux (which became Vivendi Universal) until 1992. He is currently Chairman of Soficot, whicha business management and investment consulting company he founded in 1997.

Baudoin PROTBaudouin Protis a graduate of the HEC business school in ParisEcole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales (HEC) and ENA.of the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA). From 1974 to 1983, Mr. Prothe was successively the Deputy Prefectdeputy to the prefect of the Franche-Comté region, of France, French General Inspector of Finance,financial controller in the Treasury department and deputy to the Deputy Director of Energyenergy and Raw Materials ofraw materials director general in the Ministry of Industry. He joined Banque Nationale de Paris (BNP) in 1983, where he served inheld various positions before becomingbeing appointed Executive Vice PresidentVice-President in 1992 and Chief Executive Officer in 1996. After having been appointed director and Executive Vice-President of BNP Paribas in March 2000, he has been a director and executive vice presidentChief Executive Officer of BNP Paribas since March 2000, he was named a director and chief executive officer of BNP Paribas in June 2003.


Georges RALLIRalli holds degreesa graduate degree (DESS) in banking and finance political science (fromfrom the University of Paris-V and is a graduate of the Institut d’Etudes Politiques (IEP) in Paris Instituteand of Political Science (IEP)) and business. He began his banking career atthe Institut Commercial in Nancy. In 1970, he joined Crédit Lyonnais, (1970-1981) and later headed the department of financial negotiations at Crédit du Nord.where he held various management positions until 1981. In 1982, he served as Secretarysecretary of the Commission for theSavings Development and Protection Commission. From 1982 to 1985, he headed the financial negotiations department of Savings. In 1986, Mr. RalliCrédit du Nord. He joined Lazard becoming ain 1986, and became managing partner in 1993 and then co-head ofjointly headed the mergers and acquisitions atdepartment of Lazard LLC starting in 1999. Since 2000, Mr.Georges Ralli has been deputy chairmanDeputy Chairman and a member of the executive committeeExecutive Committee of Lazard LLC (U.S.) and an executive vice president of Lazard Frères (Paris)(United States). Since 2006, he has been Chief Executivethe Co-Chairman of the European Investment Banking Committee of the Lazard Group LLC.LLC (United St ates) and a member of the European Advisory Board. He was head of Maison française from 2006 to 2009. He currently manages the European M&A activities (Chairman of Maison Lazard) and Asset Management activities (President of Lazard Frères Gestion).

Paolo SCARONIScaroni holds a degree in economics from Bocconi University in Milan and has an MBA from Columbia Business School (New York).in New York. After having spent a year with McKinsey & Company following his MBA, between 1973 and 1985, he held various positions between 1973 and 1985 with Saint Gobain, where he became chairman ofultimately heading the “flat glass” department.division. In 1985, Paolo Scaroni became chief executive officerChief Executive Officer of Techint, while also being chairmanat the same time holding the positions of deputy Chairman of Falck and chief executive officerExecutive Vice-President of SIV, a joint-venturejoint venture between Techint and Pilkington plc. He became chief executive officerChief Executive Officer of Pilkington plc in 1996, a position he held until May 2002. Following being chief executive officerHe was Chief Executive Officer of Enel from 2002 to 2005 he became chief executive officer of Eniand in June 2005 a position he still currently holds.   

Louis SCHWEITZER isa graduate of the Institut d’Etudes Politiques de Paris and ENA.  He has served as Inspector of Finances and, from 1981 to 1986, as Chief of Staff of Mr. Laurent Fabius, who over the same period was Deputy Minister of Budget, Minister of Industry and Research and Prime Minister of France.  In 1986, Mr. Schweitzer joined Renault’s senior management as Director, and later served as Director of Planning and Management Control, Chief Financial Officer (in 1989) and Executive Vice President.  He became Chief Executive Officer of RenaultEni, a position he still holds.

Evaluation of the independence of directors

As defined by the Board of Directors’ internal rules and regulations, an independent director is a director who does not have any relationship with the Company, its Group or its management that could compromise his ability to exercise his judgment objectively. The criteria in 1990the internal rules and regulations for determining directors’ independence are in accordance with the recommendations of the AFEP-MEDEF corporate governance code.

These criteria are evaluated and weighted by the Board of Directors, which can determine that despite the fact that a director does not meet the criteria set forth in the internal rules and regulations, a director can nevertheless be considered to be independent in light of his specific situation or that of the Company, taking into account its shareholders or any other reason. Conversely, the Board of Directors can determine that a director is not independent despite the fact that he meets the criteria set forth in the internal rules and regulations.

The internal rules and regulations also require that, each year, before the publication of the reference document, the Board of Directors evaluate the independence of each of its members on the basis of the criteria contained in said rules and regulations, specific circumstances, the positions of the relevant director, the Company and the Group and the opinion of the Nominations and Compensation Committee.

After reviewing the opinion of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, at its meeting of March 24, 2010, the Board of Directors conducted its annual evaluation of the directors’ independence. Based on this evaluation, the Board considered the following directors to be independent: Jean Azéma, Daniel Bouton, Pierre-André de Chalendar, Jean-François Dehecq, Augustin de Romanet de Beaune, Jean-Marc Espalioux, Paul-Louis Girardot, Baudouin Prot, Paolo Scaroni, Louis Schweitzer and Esther Koplowitz.



128



Back to Contents


With regard to the banking relationships between Veolia Environnement and BNP Paribas, of which Baudouin Prot is a director and Chief Executive Officer, the Board of Directors considered that Veolia Environnement’s solid financial position, the fact that it does not rely on bank financing and the Company’s limited stake in that bank’s business activities enabled it to consider that Baudouin Prot is an independent director on the Company’s Board. Augustin de Romanet de Beaune was deemed to be independent due to the fact that Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations has been charged with making investments that are of public benefit, in particular in the environmental services sector. Lastly, Paul-Louis Girardot was deemed to be independent due to the time that has elapsed since he left his position as Chief Executive Officer of the former lead company of what is now the Water Division. The other directors deemed to be independent do not have any business relations with the Company, or do not have significant business relations that are likely to compromise their ability to exercise their judgment objectively.

Accordingly, our Board of Directors has eleven independent members as of the date of this annual report on Form 20-F.

Compensation

Directors may be compensated in one of two ways: directors’ fees paid for attending meetings of our Board of Directors (jetons de présence), which are set by our Company’s annual shareholders’ meeting, and whose allocation is determined by our Board of Directors pursuant to recommendations of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, and exceptional compensation, which may be awarded by the Board of Directors under conditions set by law.

The amount of directors’ fees paid in 2009 and their division between the members of the Board of Directors are described and detailed in a table under “Compensation – Board of Directors Compension”. No exceptional compensation was awarded to directors in 2009.

Operations and activity in 2009

Directors may participate in Board deliberations by videoconference or other means of telecommunications, in accordance with the requirements of Articles L. 225-37 and R. 225-21 of the French Commercial Code and as provided by the internal rules and regulations of the Board of Directors. In such case, directors are deemed present for the purpose of calculating the quorum and majority, except with regard to the vote on certain major decisions as provided by law and by the Board’s internal rules (in particular, the preparation of the annual financial statements, the management report and the consolidated financial statements). This option was used at ten Board meetings in 2009 (compared with four meetings in 2008).

According to its internal rules and regulations, the Company’s Board of Directors is required to meet at least four times per year. During the 2009 fiscal year, the Board met fourteen times (compared to seven times in 2008). On average, Board meetings lasted two hours, thereby allowing for a thorough examination and discussion of the matters of business on the agenda. The average attendance rate at Board meetings in 2009 was 85.9% (compared to 80.6% in 2008).

In 2009, the Board of Directors was regularly informed of the Group’s financial situation and monitored the sale of assets program and the efficiency plan set up notably as a result of the deterioration of the position of the Environmental Services Division at the end of the 2008 fiscal year. Furthermore, during the second six months of the year, the Board met regularly in order to conduct an in-depth review of changes to be made to the Company’s governance in light of the appointment of Mr. Henri Proglio as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of EDF and to discuss his replacement as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. On issues of corporate governance, the Board’s work focused, in May 1992. He servedparticular, on the adoption and implementation of the AFEP-MEDEF code, as amended in 2008, the termination of the employment contract of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer an d then of the Chief Executive Officer, the separation of the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and providing termination compensation to the Chief Executive Officer, the creation of the position of Vice-Chairman, setting the compensation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and, then, of the Chairman and of the Chief Executive Officer individually after this position until April 29,was separated into two positions, the corporate officer’s compensation policy and the examination of the Executive Committee’s one, evaluating the independence of directors, evaluating internal controls and approving the Chairman’s report, distributing directors’ fees to directors and revising the rules for distributing the variable portion of directors’ fees and revising the internal rules and regulations of the Board and of its Committees.

In 2009, the Board of Directors’ other activities also focused on the following matters: the budget, the annual and semi-annual financial statements, obtaining information on the financial statements for the first and third quarters, the Group’s financing policy, the resolutions to be submitted to the annual combined general shareholders’ meeting, giving its opinion on the Company’s policy with regard to incentive plans for the Group’s managers and corporate officers (stock options, free shares), a capital increase reserved to employees, granting financial and legal authorizations to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and to the Chief Executive Officer and the renewal thereof. The Board examined the Group’s significant transactions and, when necessary, granted the required authorizations.



129



Back to Contents


Board Evaluation

Once a year, the Board is required to include on its agenda an evaluation of its operations prepared by the Nominations and Compensation Committee and a discussion of its operations for the purpose of improving its efficiency, ensuring that important issues are adequately prepared and discussed during Board meetings and assessing the actual contributions of each member to the Board’s work.

In addition, the Board’s internal rules and regulations provide that a formal evaluation of its operations must be carried out every three years by an outside organization, under the direction of the Nominations and Compensation Committee for the purpose of ensuring that the Board complies with the principles governing its operations and studying proposals intended to improve its operations and efficiency. Each year, the Nominations and Compensation Committee provides the Board of Directors with a report evaluating the performances of the Chairman and of the directors, as well as the actions of executive management, which the Board discusses.

In 2009, an informal evaluation of the operations of the Board and its Committees was carried out under the direction of the Chairman of the Nominations and Compensation Committee by sending directors a detailed questionnaire. The responses were analyzed and then presented to the Board of Directors at its meeting of December 17, 2009. The Board adopted the following conclusions:

The directors considered that they had the information necessary for effective participation. Nevertheless, possible improvements were suggested: providing a view of future outlook through more frequent forecasts and focusing on the quality of financial information concerning expected results; providing better summaries of financial information, focusing on essential points and/or questions asked or issues to be resolved; ensuring better communication in terms of frequency and content between meetings; improved reports to the Board on oversight of decisions made, and extend the duration of one or two meetings a year to deepen the strategy.

The organization and operations of the Board (frequency of meetings, attendance of Board members, scheduling, minutes) were deemed satisfactory.

On the whole, the directors considered the composition of the Board to be satisfactory, provided an independent female director was found (it should be noted that Esther Koplowitz was appointed to the Board after this evaluation was carried out) and the balance between financial and industrial directors on the Board was maintained. The distribution of directors’ fees was deemed satisfactory and required no particular comment.

All directors considered that the Committees fulfill their duties. The operation of the Committees (information provided, frequency of meetings, access to executive management) was deemed satisfactory. It was nevertheless requested that the Accounts and Audit Committee make a specific presentation concerning risks and the control thereof.

Lastly, the composition of the Committees was deemed satisfactory (expertise, number, independence). Nevertheless, it was suggested that an additional member be appointed to the Accounts and Audit Committee and to the Nominations and Compensation Committee.

The Board will be provided with a report on progress made on these points.



130



Back to Contents


Information Available to Directors

The Chairman provides directors, in a timely manner, with the information necessary for them to fully perform their duties. In addition, the Chairman constantly provides the members of the Board with all significant information concerning the Company. Each director receives and has the right to request that he be provided with all information necessary to perform his duties, and can request additional training concerning the specificities of the Company and the Group.

In accordance with the requests of the members of the Board of Directors, executive management has given particular attention to increasing the speed with which directors are provided with documents relevant to Board meetings and all significant information concerning the Group’s activities, as well as to providing directors with information between Board meetings.

After the separation of the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, the Board’s internal rules and regulations provide that the non-director Chief Executive Officer is automatically invited to all Board meetings, except if the Chairman or the Board decides otherwise. The Chief Finance Officer and the Secretary General attended Board meetings in 2009. At the request of the Chairman or of a director, the heads of the Group’s Divisions may be invited to any Board meeting that discusses the prospects and strategy of their business sector.

The Board of Directors, in particular through the reports of the Accounts and Audit Committee, was informed from time to time of the Group’s financial situation and cash position, as well as the Company’s off-balance sheet commitments. Every six months, executive management provides directors with in-depth documentation regarding the activities, market trends, context and actions undertaken by the Group, in accordance with any request made by the directors in 2005 atduring the Board evaluation procedure.

In order to perform their duties, the directors may meet with the principal officers of the Company and of the Group, provided the Chairman of the Board is given prior notice.

Duties of Directors

The internal rules and regulations of the Board of Directors provide that the Board’s members are subject to certain obligations, such as: (i) the duty to act in the Company’s corporate interest, (ii) to inform the Board of conflicts of interest, including potential conflicts of interest, (iii) to refrain from participating in votes on any decision in which point his sole function within Renault becamethey may have a conflict of interest, (iv) to comply with their obligation of professional confidentiality, and (v) to comply with the Company’s code of conduct regarding securities transactions. The members of the Board of Directors and the Chief Executive Officer are required to promptly inform the Chairman of the Board of Directors.all agreements made by the Company in which they have a direct or indirect interest or that is made on their behalf by an intermediary.

Murray STUART holds degrees in literatureEach director receives a “Director’s Guide”, which is updated periodically, and law fromwhich includes the Universityfollowing principal documents: the Company’s articles of Glasgow, and is also trained as an accountant. He has pursuedincorporation, a career in industry, commerce and financial services. Mr. Stuart has worked for International Computers Plc (as Chief Financial Officer and Deputy Director), Metal Box plc and Carnaud Metalbox (as Vice-President) and Scottish Power Plc (as President from 1992 to 2000). Until May 2002, he also served as Executive Vice Presidentsummary of the powers of the Chief Executive Officer, the Board of Directors’ internal rules and regulations, the internal rules and regulations of the Accounts and Audit Commission for Public ServicesCommittee and of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, the rules regarding directors’ obligations to report transactions involving the Company’s securities, as well as our “Ethics, Commitments and Responsibility” charter.

With respect to trading in our securities, the UK, as Presidentdirectors are required to report to us and to the FrenchAutorité des marchés financiers(AMF) any transactions involving the Company’s securities and, in particular, to comply with the provisions of Trust Hammersmith Hospitals NHS, an important public health educationArticle L. 621-18-2 of the French Monetary and research center in London, and as a director of Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc.   Financial Code (Code Monétaire et Financier).

Management

Our boardRole of directorsthe Chairman

The Chairman of the Board of Directors organizes and directs the mannerwork of the Board and reports thereon to general shareholders’ meetings. He is responsible for preparing reports on the organization of the Board’s work, internal controls and risk management. He chairs general shareholders’ meetings.

In general, the Chairman of the Board of Directors ensures the proper operation of the Company’s management bodies and compliance with good governance principles and practices, in which weparticular regarding the committees created within the Board. He ensures that the directors are managedin a position to perform their duties and that they are adequately informed. He devotes the time necessary to issues concerning the Group’s future and, in particular, issues concerning the Group’s strategy.



131



Back to Contents


The Chairman of the Board chairs Board meetings and prepares and coordinates the Board’s work. In this regard, the Chairman is responsible for:

Convening Board meetings in accordance with the schedule of meetings agreed upon with the directors and decides if it is necessary to convene Board meetings at any other time;

Preparing the agenda for meetings, supervises the preparation of documentation to be provided to the directors and ensures that the information therein is complete;

Ensuring that certain subjects are discussed by the Committees in preparation for Board meetings and ensuring that the Committees perform their duties of making recommendations to the Board;

Leading and directing the Board’s discussions;

Ensuring the directors’ compliance with the provisions of the internal rules and regulations of the Board and of the Committees;

Monitoring implementation of the Board’s decisions;

Preparing and organizing the Board’s periodic evaluation work, in cooperation with the Nominations and Compensation Committee.

In cooperation with the Chief Executive Officer, the Chairman may promote the Company, in particular vis-à-vis the public authorities, major customers and principal investors and partners, both in France and abroad. As the primary contact on the Board for major shareholders, the Chairman is responsible for communicating their point of view and concerns to the Board and the other directors. The Chairman promotes our values and image in all circumstances. The Chairman speaks to third parties in the name of the Board of Directors, except when specific authority to do so has been granted to another director.

The Chief Executive Officer regularly informs the Chairman of the Board of Directors of all significant events and issues concerning the activities of the Group and the Chairman may request that the Chief Executive Officer provide him with any additional information required to enlighten the Board and its Committees. In accordance with the Board’s internal rules and regulations, the directors and the Chief Executive Officer are required to promptly inform the Chairman of the Board of all conflicts of interest, including potential conflicts of interest, and of all proposed agreements that may be made by the Company in which they may have a direct or indirect interest.

The Chairman has at his disposal all resources necessary to perform his duties.

Role of the Vice-Chairman

In addition to the role conferred on him by our articles of association.incorporation, the duties of the Vice-Chairman are to assist the Chairman in carrying out his duties of ensuring the proper functioning of the Company’s governance bodies. In this regard, the Vice-Chairman examines, in particular, our boardconflicts of directors appoints a chief executive officerinterest, including potential conflicts of interest, that may involve the Chairman of the Board and the interests of the Company, whether they arise in connection with operational projects, strategic policies or specific agreements. The Vice-Chairman submits his recommendations to manage our businessthe Chairman and the Board after any necessary consultation with the other independent directors.

The Vice-Chairman is informed of the concerns of major shareholders not represented on a day-to-day basis.  the Board regarding governance issues and ensures that such concerns are addressed. If necessary, and in agreement with the Chairman of the Board, the Vice Chairman may also himself respond to questions of major shareholders or meet with them if the ordinary avenues for doing so (i.e., the Chairman of the Board of Directors, the Chief Executive Officer or the Chief Finance Officer) have been unable to handle such concern or if the nature itself of the matter renders these ordinary avenues inadequate or inappropriate.

In connection with the evaluation of the Board’s operations pursuant to its internal rules and regulations, the Vice-Chairman assists the Nominations and Compensation Committee in its work of evaluating the performance of the Chairman of the Board.



132



Back to Contents


Chief Executive Officer

The chairman of our board of directors may serve, if appointed byChief Executive Officer has the board of directors, as chief executive officer.  On April 30, 2003, our board of directors appointed its chairman, Mr. Henri Proglio, to act as our chief executive officer.  The chief executive officer has broadbroadest possible powers to act on our behalf, includingin the powername of the Company in all circumstances. He is required to represent us in dealings with third parties,act within the limits of ourthe corporate purposepurposes, subject to those powers that the law expressly confers on shareholders’ meetings and the Board of Directors. He represents the Company in its relations with third parties.

In accordance with an internal rule, the Chief Executive Officer is required to exercise his powers expressly reservedwithin the limits prescribed by the internal rules and regulations of the Board of Directors. Therefore, pursuant to our shareholdersthe Board decision of November 27, 2009 that appointed the Chief Executive Officer and our boardin accordance with the Board’s internal rules and regulations, as amended on May 7, 2009, the following actions of directors.the Chief Executive Officer require prior Board approval:

Establishing the Group’s strategic policies;

Group transactions involving amounts in excess of €300 million per transaction, with the exception of financing transactions;

Financing transactions, regardless of the terms and conditions thereof, involving amounts in excess of €1.5 billion per transaction if the transaction is carried out in a single installment and €2.5 billion if the transaction is carried out in more than one installment;

Transactions in the Company shares involving more than 1% of the total number of the Company’s shares.

Executive Committee

Following the change of our corporate formreorganization on April 30, 2003, and in application of our governance principles, our chairmanthen Chairman and chief executive officerChief Executive Officer created an executive committeeExecutive Committee composed of seven members drawn from each of our four operating divisions (all of whom, with the exception of Mr. Eric Marie de Ficquelmont, were members of our former management board until April 30, 2003).Divisions. Our executive committeeExecutive Committee meets approximately every fifteen days, and is chaired by Mr. Henri Proglio.  The executive committee helpstwo weeks to determine our principal strategy.




Backstrategic orientation and to contents



The following table sets forthestablish major policies. In addition, it authorizes major projects, such as sales contracts and proposed investments, divestments or sales for amounts above certain thresholds. Until November 26, 2009, the names and agesExecutive Committee had eight members, none of the members of our executive committee, their current function in our company and theirwhom had principal business activities outside of Veolia Environnement:

Henri Proglio, age 60 (Chairman and Chief Executive Officer);

Olivier Barbaroux, age 54 (Senior Executive Vice-President, Chairman of Dalkia);

Antoine Frérot, age 51 (Senior Executive Vice-President, Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Eau – Compagnie Générale des Eaux);

Denis Gasquet, age 56 (Senior Executive Vice-President, Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Environmental Services);

Cyrille du Peloux, age 56 (Senior Executive Vice-President, Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Transport);

Thomas Piquemal, age 40 (Chief Finance Officer);

Véronique Rouzaud, age 51 (Senior Vice President, Human Resources);

Alain Tchernonog, age 66 (General Secretary).

The composition of the Executive Committee was changed when Antoine Frérot was appointed Chief Executive Officer on November 27, 2009 to replace Henri Proglio, who had held the position of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer until then. In addition to his responsibilities as head of the Environmental Services Division, Denis Gasquet was appointed the Company’s Chief Operating Officer. In this capacity, he is in charge of implementing a unified management structure for the Group, supervising the Group’s subsidiaries and cross-disciplinary departments and supervising the effectiveness and structural cost control plans.



133



Back to Contents


Since February 11, 2010 and as of the date of this annual report on Form 20-F, the Company’s Executive Committee had nine members, none of whom has principal business activities outside of Veolia Environnement:

Antoine Frérot, age 51 (Chief Executive Officer)*;

Olivier Barbaroux, age 54 (Head of the Energy Services Division and Chief Executive Officer of Dalkia)*;

Jean-Pierre Frémont, age 46 (Senior Executive Vice-President in charge of public entities and European affairs);

Denis Gasquet, age 56 (Chief Operating Officer of the Company and Head of the Environmental Services Division)*;

Jean-Michel Herrewyn, age 48 (Head of the Water Division)*;

Olivier Orsini, age 52 (Senior Executive Vice-President and Secretary General)*;

Cyrille du Peloux, age 56 (Head of the Transport Division)*;

Pierre-François Riolacci, age 43 (Chief Finance Officer) ;

Véronique Rouzaud, age 51 (Senior Vice President, Human Resources)*.

* Members of the Executive Committee at December 31, 2009.


The Executive Committee is chaired by Antoine Frérot. This committee is a reflection, consultation and decision making body that meets when the Group’s major policies are established. In addition, it authorizes major Group projects, such as sales contracts and proposed investments, divestments or sales for amounts above certain thresholds. The Executive Committee meets approximately every fifteen days.

In order to further enhance the Company’s capabilities to assess and oversee projects, in 2008, a commitments subcommittee of our company.1

Name

Age

Function in Veolia Environnement

Principal Business
Activities Outside
Veolia Environnement

————

————

————

————

Henri Proglio

58

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

None

Jérôme Contamine

49

Senior Executive Vice President

None

Olivier Barbaroux

51

Executive Vice President, Head of Veolia Energie

None

Antoine Frérot

49

Executive Vice President, Head of Veolia Eau- Compagnie Général des Eaux

None

Denis Gasquet

53

Executive Vice President, Head of Veolia Propreté

None

Cyrille du Peloux2

53

Executive Vice President, Head of Transport

None

Alain Tchernonog3

63

General Secretary

None


Executive Committee was created, which is chaired by the Chief Executive Officer. This subcommittee conducts an in-depth review of major Group projects that must be submitted to the Executive Committee for final decision, before submission to the Board of Directors for authorization depending on the amounts involved. The subcommittee includes the head of the Group Division concerned by a particular project, the Chief Finance Officer and the Company’s Secretary General.

Jérôme ContamineAntoine Frérot is a graduate of theEcole Polytechnique and holds degreesa doctorate from theEcole Polytechnique,Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées. He started his career in 1981 as an engineering researcher at the Central Research Office for French Overseas Departments and Territories. In 1983, he joined the Center of Study and Research of the Ecole Nationale de la Statistique et de l’Administration Economiquenationale des ponts and ENA. He servedchaussées as auditor for the Cour des Comptesproject manager and then become assistant director from 1984 to 1988. From 1988 and held a varietyto 1990, he was in charge of senior positions with Elf (and later TotalFinaElf) between 1988 and 2000. He became Chief Financial Officer and Deputy Managing Director of our company in June 2000. Mr. Contamine holds various positions within our group, the most significant being managing director of Veolia UK Ltd, director of Veolia Transport, Veolia Propreté, VE Services-Ré, Veolia Environmental Services, UK Plc, Veolia ES Holdings and Veolia PPP Finance, member of the supervisory board of Dalkia France and Veolia Eau -Compagniefinancial operations at Crédit National. In 1990, Antoine Frérot joined Compagnie Générale des Eaux chairmanas an official representative and, in 1995, became Chief Executive Officer of CGEA Transport. In 2000, he was appointed Chief Executive Officer of CONNEX, the Transport Division of Vivendi Environnement, and member of the Executive Committee of Vivendi En vironnement. In January 2003, Mr. Frérot was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Eau, the Water Division of Veolia Environnement, North America Operations.  Outside our group, Mr. Contamineand Senior Executive Vice President of Veolia Environnement. Since November 2009, he is a directorthe Chief Executive Officer of Rhodia an d Valeo.Veolia Environnement.

Olivier Barbarouxis a graduate of theEcole Polytechnique, theEcole Nationale des Ponts et Chausséesand the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He began his career in 1979 as head of the International Investments Bureau at the French Ministry of Industry. He was appointed to the Port Authority of Marseilles-FosMarseille-Fos in 1981, first as Director of New Construction and Ship Repair and then as Director of MarseillesMarseille Terminals and Facilities in 1983. He joined the Paribas Group in 1987 as Deputy Director of Industrial Affairs, and in 1993 was appointed as a member of the Executive Committee of Paribas Affaires Industrielles, in charge of Energy, Natural Resources and Transportation, and as Chairman and CEOChief Executive Officer of Coparex International (listed). In 1996, he was appointed Chairman and CEOChief Executive Officer of VIA GTI (listed). He became global Head of the Energy Division at Paribas in 1998. He joine djoined our companyCompany in 1999 as Chief Operating Officer of Vivendi Water. He was appointed PresidentChief Executive Officer of Dalkia in February 2003. Mr. Barbaroux holds various positions within our group,Group, the most significant being permanent representative of Dalkia on the board of Clemessy, member of the supervisory boards of Compagnie des Eaux et de l’OzoneChairman and Compagnie des Eaux de Paris, chairman and chief executive officerChief Executive Officer of Dalkia International, managing directorManaging Director (gérant) of Dalkia France and directorDirector of Veolia Propreté, SARP and Sade CGTH.



134



Back to Contents


Jean-Pierre Frémontholds a PhD in political science. Mr. Frémont joined the Group in 1997 as Project Manager for CGEA (Vivendi Environnement). From 1998 to 2002, he held the Managing Director position at CFTA (Vivendi Environnement). He then took over the Municipal Business Development Department for Veolia Eau in 2002, before becoming Key Account Manager for Veolia Environnement in 2007. Mr. Frémont was recently appointed Senior Executive Vice-President in charge of Municipal Business Development and European Affairs of Veolia Environnement and appointed to the Executive Committee.

Olivier Orsini is a graduate of ESCP – EAP Europe Business School. In 1983, he joined the Compagnie Générale des Eaux as special advisor and in 1989, was appointed Chief Executive Officer of theUnion des Services Publicsfor Environmental Services in France. From 1994 to 1999, Mr. Orsini held various positions within our Group, the most significant being Director for International Environmental Services andConsejero Delegado de Ciudad Limpia, for the Group activities in Spain. In 2000, he was appointed Special Advisor to the President and director of Synergies (brand, efficiency plan, purchases and mutualization). Mr. Orsini is also Chairman ofProactiva Medio Ambiente, Veolia Environnement’s joint venture with Fomentos Construcciones y Contratas (FCC) in Latin America. Mr. Orsini was recently appointed Secretary General, Seni or Executive Vice-President and Executive Committee Member of Veolia Environnement.

Denis Gasquetis a graduate of theEcole Polytechniqueand theCentre de Perfectionnement aux Affaires. From 1979 to 1989, he served in a variety of positions in theOffice National des Forêts. He joined Compagnie Générale des Eaux in 1989, becoming Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Propreté in 1996. Mr. Gasquet holds various positions within our Group, the most significant being member of the Supervisory Board of Veolia Eau-Compagnie Générale des Eaux, Director of Veolia Environmental Services UK Plc, Veolia Transport, SARP and SARP Industries, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environmental Services North America Corp. and Veolia Environmental Services Australia Pty Ltd.

Jean-Michel Herrewyn, is a graduate ofEcole PolytechniqueandEcole Nationale d’Administration. He started his career in 1986 as an engineer in the Avionics division of Thomson CSF. In 1991, he joined the Compagnie Générale de Chauffe (now Dalkia) as technical manager then general manager of the home automation subsidiary. In 1993, he became attaché to the Managing Director and in 1996 ran Dalkia’s German subsidiary and later subsidiaries in Austria and Switzerland. At the beginning of 2000, he was also appointed General Manager of Veolia Transport’s German subsidiary, and also supervised developments in Austria and Switzerland. In 2000, he was appointed Chairman of Valorec, a joint subsidiary of Dalkia and Veolia Propreté, created from the outsourcing of energy and waste management by Novartis plants in Basle (Switzerl and). In March 2003, he joined Veolia Eau as Managing Director of Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies. In December 2009, he was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Eau and to the Executive Committee of Veolia Environnement.

Cyrille du Pelouxis a graduate oftheEcole Polytechnique and theEcole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées (civil(civil engineering). He began his career in the energy department of France’s Ministry of Industry in 1979. In 1985 he joined the Bouygues group where he served as head of the diversification department and then as deputy chief executive officerDeputy Chief Executive Officer of the TF1 television channel in charge of the management and development of the subsidiaries. In 1992, he became chairmanChairman and chief executive officerChief Executive Officer of Lyonnaise Communication, in charge of Noos and of the Paris Première and TPS channels. Mr. du Peloux was chief executive officerChief Executive Officer of Bull from 1999 to 2002, when he joined the Veolia Environnement Group as chief executive officerChief Executive Officer of Veolia Propreté for the UK and Northern Europe. He was then appointed chief executive officerChief Execu tive Officer of Veolia Transport on May 31, 2007. Mr. du Peloux holds various positions within our group,Group, the most significant being directorDirector of Veolia Propreté and Veolia UK Plc and member of the supervisory board of SNCM.

Antoine Frérotis a graduate of the Ecole Polytechnique and holds a doctorate from the Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées. He began his career as an engineer and joined Cergrene, a research center, in 1983, becoming a Director in 1984.  He joined Compagnie Générale des Eaux in 1990, and was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Transport in 1995.  Mr. Frérot holds various positions within our group, the most significant being director of Veolia Transport and Veolia Propreté and Sade, permanent representative of Veolia Eau-Compagnie Générale des Eaux on the board of  Société des Eaux de Marseille, chairman of the supervisory board of Compagnie des Eaux et de l’Ozone, chief executive officer of Veolia Eau -- Compagnie Générale des Eaux, and chairman of the board of Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies.

Denis Gasquetis a graduate of the Ecole Polytechnique and the Centre de Perfectionnement aux Affaires. From 1979 to 1989, he served in a variety of positions in the Office National des Forets. He joined Compagnie Générale des Eaux in 1989, becoming Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Propreté in 1996. Mr. Gasquet holds various positions within our group, the most significant being member of the supervisory board of Veolia Eau-Compagnie Générale des Eaux, director of Veolia Environmental Services UK Plc, SARP, SARP Industries and Veolia Environmental Services North America Corp. and chairman of the board of directors of  Veolia Environmental Services Australia Pty Ltd.      

1

Since January 2007, Mr. Eric Marie de Ficquelmont (Executive Vice President – Human Resources) is no longer a member of our executive committee.

2

Mr. Stéphane Richard resigned from his position of chief executive officer of Veolia Transport on May 31, 2007.  As a result, he is no longer a member of our executive committee since that date.  Mr. du Peloux was appointed CEO of Veolia Transport on May 31, 2007.

3

Mr. Alain Tchernonog, General Secretary, has been a member of the executive committee since January 1, 2007.




Back to contents



Alain Tchernonog holds a doctorate in law. He is a graduate of the Institut d’Administration d’Entreprises and is admitted to the Bar. He began his career in 1972 as in-house lawyer at the Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales. In 1974, he was appointed chief of legal service of the Agence Nationale de Valorisation de la Recherche (ANVAR). Alain Tchernonog was head of contracts department in Roussel-Uclaf from 1979 to 1990, and then general counsel of Pierre Fabre group from 1990 to 1995. He joined the Compagnie Générale d’Entreprises Automobiles (which became Onyx and Connex and Veolia Propreté and Veolia Transport) in 1995 to manage the legal department and became general counsel of Veolia Environnement in 2001. He became member of the executive committee of our company in January 2007 and was appointed General Secretary in March 2007. Mr Tchernonog holds various po sitions within our group, the most significant being chairman and chief executive officer of VE Services-Ré, director of Veolia PPP Finance, Veolia Water systems, Codeve and Veolia Environnement North America Operations and Veolia Environnement UK Ltd, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Veolia Transportation Inc. and Chairman of the Supervisory Board of SNCM.

Pierre-François Riolacci, is a graduate of the Paris Institute of Political Science (IEP Paris) and holds a Masters degree in private law. He joined the finance department of Veolia Environnement in 2000. He became Head of Control and Planning in 2003 and Director of Finance in 2007, before being appointed Chief Finance Officer with effect from February 11, 2010 and Executive Committee member of Veolia Environnement. In his earlier career, Mr. Riolacci held different positions with Total from 1990 to 2000 in the areas of corporate finance, structured finance and investor relations. He was also financial controller of several of Total’s subsidiaries.

Véronique Rouzaudholds a Master’s degree in law from the Université de Paris II – Assas and a MBA from theInstitut d’Administration des Entreprisesde Paris. She has occupied key positions in sales and human resources in major international business organizations, first in the Danone group, and then at Coca-Cola in Europe. She was also President of the European Works Council for the Coca-Cola Enterprises Europe Group until January 2007. Since February 2007, she has been the Senior Vice President, Human Resources of Veolia Environnement. Ms. Rouzaud is also member of the supervisory boardBoard of Dalkia France.


Directors of Sade CGTH, a subsidiary of Veolia Environnement.



135



Back to contentsContents



COMPENSATION

Board of Directors’ Compensation

The members of our boardBoard of directorsDirectors received the following compensation during the 20062008 and 2009 fiscal yearyears for services to us and our subsidiaries including in particular directors’(directors’ fees (jetons de presence) paid for attending meetings of our boardboards of directors (jetons de présence)of our Company or subsidiaries):


Director

Directors’ fees paid by Veolia Environnement

(in euros)

Directors’ fees paid by Subsidiaries

(in euros)

Directors’ fees paid by
Veolia Environnement
(in euros)

Directors’ fees paid by
Controlled Companies
(in euros)

2006

2005

2006

2005

2009

2008

2009

2008

Jean Azema

48,250

45,250

0

Jean Azéma***

36,660*

0

Daniel Bouton

48,250

39,000

0

50,000

0

Jean-François Dehecq(1)

15,495

n/a

0

n/a

Pierre-André de Chalendar

20,055*

N/A

0

N/A

Jean-François Dehecq

40,000

0

Augustin de Romanet de Beaune***

40,000

0

Jean-Marc Espalioux

48,250

45,250

0

53,320*

60,000

0

Jacques Espinasse(2)

16,500

34,000

0

Paul-Louis Girardot

48,250

45,250

48,535

49,059

60,000

48,337

Philippe Kourilsky

38,250

34,000

0

60,000

0

Arthur Laffer (3)

28,688*

25,500*

0

Francis Mayer (3)

38,250

34,000

0

Serge Michel

76,250

65,000

10,025

8,213

80,000

6,763

6,955

Baudoin Prot

38,250

34,000

0

Baudouin Prot

30,000

40,000

0

Georges Ralli

38,250

34,000

0

36,660*

40,000

0

Paolo Scaroni

40,000

30,500**

0

Louis Schweitzer

48,250

45,250

0

50,000

0

Murray Stuart

84,188*

57,750*

0

120,000

91,500**

0

* Net amount after tax withholdings.

(1) Appointed by our shareholders’ meeting of May 11, 2006.

(2) Term of office as director expired at the end of our shareholders’ meeting of May 11, 2006.

(3) Expiration of term of office recorded by the board of directors on December 12, 2006.


N/A: Not applicable

*

Net of amounts withheld pursuant to the attendance rules adopted by the Board of Directors (see below).

**

Net amounts paid after tax withholding. Mr. Murray Stuart resigned from his position as director effective December 31, 2009. He was replaced by Esther Koplowitz, who was temporarily appointed to that position by the Board of Directors on December 17, 2009, effective January 1, 2010.

***

At the request of the beneficiaries, the entire amount of directors’ fees was paid directly to Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations and to Groupama SA..


N/A: Not applicable

*

Net of amounts withheld pursuant to the attendance rules adopted by the Board of Directors (see below).

**

Net amounts paid after tax withholding. Mr. Murray Stuart resigned from his position as director effective December 31, 2009. He was replaced by Esther Koplowitz, who was temporarily appointed to that position by the Board of Directors on December 17, 2009, effective January 1, 2010.

***

At the request of the beneficiaries, the entire amount of directors’ fees was paid directly to Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations and to Groupama SA..


Total Amount and Division of Directors’ Fees


ThePursuant to a proposal of the Board of Directors, the general shareholders’ meeting of May 7, 2009 increased the total annual amount of directors’ fees to be paid to our directors set at €600,000 by€825,000 (amount calculated on the shareholders’ meeting held on April 30, 2003,basis of fifteen directors) for the 2009 fiscal year. The increase was not modified until 2006.  However, following the recommendation of the nominations and compensation committee, our board of directors decided in March 2005 to modify the allocation of fees in orderintended to take into account the specific duties incumbent upon the Board’s Advisory Committees (in particular, the Accounts and Audit Committee), the appointment of an additional member to the accounts and audit committee and the replacement of a member on the nominations and compensation committee in particular.  

On May 11, 2006, following recommendations by our board of directors, the shareholders’ meeting increased to €770,000 the total fees to be paid to directors from fiscal year 2006.  The proposed increase was designed to take into account the duties incumbent upon committee members (in particular those of the accounts and audit committee)director and to align our group’s practicesthe amount of directors’ fees with those of other companies included in the CAC 40 that are also listed in the U.S.United States. The total amount of directors’ fees for the previous year was €770,000.




Back to contents



During theAt its meeting onof March 28, 2006, the board of directors decided to allocate directors’ fees of €730,000 for the 2006 fiscal year, the Board of Directors decided to distribute the total amount as follows:

·

Person acting in role €40,000 to Board members, €50,000 to Board members who are also members of board member only: €40,000

·

Person acting in role of board member anda committee, member: €50,000

·

€80,000 to the Chairman of the nominationsNominations and compensation committee: €80,000

·

Compensation Committee and €120,000 to the Chairman of the accountsAccounts and audit committee: €120,000Audit Committee.

The board of directors, during

136



Back to Contents


At its meeting onof March 29, 2007, decided not to propose an increase in director’s fees of €770,000 to the general meeting held on May 10, 2007, but has modified the distribution among directors in order to account for the creation2007 fiscal year, the Board of the strategic research, innovation and sustainable development committee.  The board thusDirectors decided to allocatedistribute the amount of directors’ fees for the fiscal year, set at €770,000, as follows: €60,000 to the chairmanChairman of the strategic research, innovationStrategic, Research, Innovation and sustainable development committeeSustainable Development Committee and €60,000 to the other two other members of the strategic committeeStrategic Committee who are also members of the accountingAccounts and auditing committeeAudit Committee for their seatduties on these two committees.Committees. Otherwise, the distribution remained unchanged. At its meeting of March 24, 2009, the Board of Directors decided to maintain this distribution. Therefore, the directors’ fees for the 2009 fiscal year were distributed as follows:

Board member: €40,000;

Member of the Board and of one Committee: €50,000;

Members of the Accounts and Audit Committee and of the Research and Innovation Committee: €60,000;

Chairman of the Nominations and Compensation Committee: €80,000;

Chairman of the Accounts and Audit Committee: €120,000;

Chairman of the Research and Innovation Committee: €60,000.

At its meeting of March 24, 2010, the Board of Directors decided to maintain the distribution rules described above remains unchanged.for the 2010 fiscal year. This distribution arrangement will be reviewed after the general shareholders’ meeting of May 7, 2010 based on changes made to the composition of the Board of Directors.

Furthermore, since the 2006 fiscal year, the Board has conditioned payment of a part of the directors’ fees to which each director is entitled (whether or not they are committee members) on their attendance at Board of Directors’ meetings. Thus, since 2006, the payment of one-half of each director’s annual fees (i.e., €20,000) has been conditioned on each director’s actual attendance at a minimum of six Board meetings per year. If applicable, this one-half of each director’s fees is reduced in proportion to the number of absences.

In accordance with a proposal of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, at its meeting held on December 17, 2009, the Board of Directors decided to modify the rules for withholding payment of directors’ fees based on the directors’ attendance at Board meetings. The new rules apply as of January 1, 2010.

This new system, which is now applied by nearly all CAC 40 companies instead of the system whereby directors’ fees are withheld, consists of paying an “attendance bonus”. Under the system adopted, each director is paid a fixed portion, equal to one-half of the amount of directors’ fees per director, and a variable portion in proportion to actual attendance at Board meetings. Henceforth, the bonus for attendance at each meeting will be calculated by dividing this variable component by the actual number of Board meetings held during the year (participation via means of telecommunication counts as attendance).



137



Back to Contents


Executive Committee Compensation


All members of the Executive Committee in office on December 31, 2009, including Antoine Frérot, in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of the Water Division (with the exception of Henri Proglio, in his capacity as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer), received aggregate gross compensation of €4,746,062, compared with €5,664,246 in 2008.

In 2006,The table below shows the aggregate amount ofgross compensation paid to the members of our executive committeethe Company’s Executive Committee in 2007, 2008 and 2009, with the exception of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. This amount includes fixed and variable compensation paid by Veolia Environnement, in-kind benefits and directors’ fees received by Executive Committee members in consideration for the directors’ positions they hold with companies of the Veolia Environnement Group in France and outside France.

(in euros)

Total fixed
compensation

Total
variable
compensation

Directors’ fees
paid by Group
companies

In-kind benefits

Total
compensation

Compensation paid in 2007

2,160,041

2,109,478(1)

203,308

13,910

4,486,737

Compensation paid in 2008

2,860,052

2,576,131(2)

208,545

19,518

5,664,246

Compensation paid in 2009

3,326,648

1,238,406(3)

158,600

22,408

4,746,062


(1)

Variable portion for the 2006 fiscal year, paid in 2007.

(2)

Variable portion for the 2007 fiscal year, paid in 2008.

(3)

Variable portion for the 2008 fiscal year, paid in 2009.


Contrary to the previous fiscal year, in which profit sharing of €38,416 for 2007 was paid in 2008, no profit sharing for 2008 was paid in 2009.

Retirement Plans

There is no contract between the members of the Board of Directors and the Company or its subsidiaries that provides for the payment of benefits or compensation owed or that may be owed in the event such member ceases or changes his employment with the Company or its subsidiaries, other than our chairmanthe supplementary defined benefits group pension plan described below.

In accordance with the recommendations of the AFEP-MEDEF consolidated corporate governance code of December 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors at its meeting of December 17, 2009 took note that, effective January 1, 2010, Mr. Antoine Frérot’s employment contract, which was suspended on November 27, 2009 when he was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Environnement, would be terminated (under French corporate governance principles, Chief Executive Officers work without employment contracts). It should be noted that the termination of Mr. Antoine Frérot’s employment contract causes him to lose the right under the collective bargaining agreement to receive compensation for his seniority within the Group (over 19 years).



138



Back to Contents


Pursuant to a proposal of the Nominations and chief executive officer,Compensation Committee, at its meeting held on December 17, 2009, the Board of Directors decided to award Mr. Antoine Frérot compensation in the event of his termination as Chief Executive Officer, in accordance with the provisions of the “TEPA” Act (Article L 225-42-1 of the French Commercial Code). Such compensation is conditioned on compliance with performance requirements, and is excluded if he is entitled to a retirement pension under the supplementary defined benefits group pension plan set up for servicesthe members of the Company’s Executive Committee or if he accepts another position within the Veolia Environnement Group. Payment of this compensation is limited to situations of dismissal, non-renewal of his position or “forced departure in all capacities was €4,381,494,connection with a change of which €2,431,494 representedcontrol or strategy”. In accordance with the AFEP-MEDEF consolidated corporate governance code, the maximum amount of this termination compensation is twice the amount of total annual gross compensation (excluding directors’ fees and in-kind benefits), including the fixed portion of 2006 compensation for the last fiscal year (“Fixed Portion”) and €1,950,000 represented the average variable portion of compensation relating to(“Variable Portion”) paid for the 2005last three fiscal year which was paid inyears ended before the first halftermination of 2006.

the Chief Executive Officer (“Reference Compensation”). The table below sets forthamount and the total gross compensation (including fixed and variable compensation) paidcomponents of this termination compensation both depend on meeting the performance objectives applied to memberscalculate his annual variable compensation. The amount of our executive committee other than our chairman and chief executive officer in 2005 and 2006:

 (in euros)

Fixed
compensation

Variable
compensation

Total
compensation

Compensation paid in 2005

2,393,989

1,539,360*

3,933,349

Compensation paid in 2006

2,431,494

1,950,000**

4,381,494

*

this termination compensation is equal to twice the sum of (1) the Variable compensation due in respectPortion of his Reference Compensation (the average of the 2004last three fiscal yearyears) and paid in 2005.

**

Variable compensation due in respect(2) the Fixed Portion of his Reference Compensation (last fiscal year), adjusted by a “Performance Rate” equal to the a verage percentage of the 2005target bonus (also called “base bonus” or meeting 100% of annual objectives) met over the last three fiscal year and paid in 2006.

In addition toyears ended before the above compensation, a profit-sharing payment of €36,000 in respect of the 2005 fiscal year was paid in June 2006.

In 2006, none of our directors or executive officers were parties to contracts with us or our subsidiaries that provided for the award of benefits upon termination of their employment,his position. In the event that Mr. Antoine Frérot is terminated as Chief Executive Officer before it is possible to calculate the Reference Compensation or the average Performance Rate over the last three fiscal years ended, these indicators will be calculated over the last one or two fiscal years, as the case may be, ended before the date of Mr. Antoine Frérot’s termination as Chief Executive Officer.

Moreover, the Company and its subsidiaries do not book provisions or record any amount for purposes of paying pensions, retirement or other thanbenefits to the supplementary retirement plan described below.

Supplementary Retirement Plan

At its meeting of September 15, 2005, our board of directors decided to establish a supplementary retirement plan with defined benefits, starting from the fiscal year 2006, for the chairman and chief executive officer and other members of the Board of Directors listed in Item 6, with the exception of the Chairman of the Board of Directors in connection with his former position as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.

Supplementary Defined Premium Retirement Plan

In the 2009 fiscal year, Mr. Henri Proglio, in his capacity as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Antoine Frérot, in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer, were beneficiaries of the supplementary defined premiums group pension plan that covers all of the Group’s executive committee,managers. In connection with the change in his position as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Henri Proglio ceased to be a member of this plan during the 2009 fiscal year. As a result of the termination of Mr. Antoine Frérot’s employment contract effective January 1, 2010, Mr. Frérot ceased being a member of the plan on that date.

In 2009, under this supplementary defined premiums group pension plan, Veolia Environnement paid a premium of €8,005 on behalf of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and a premium of €9,606 on behalf of the Chief Executive Officer.

Supplementary Defined Benefits Retirement Plan

Starting in the 2006 fiscal year, the Company set up a supplementary defined benefits group pension plan for the members of the Company’s Executive Committee (salaried category 9 management employees, including corporate officers who are parties to a suspended employment contract), in line with the practices of other companies listedgroups included in the CAC 40.

This supplementary retirementpension plan beingis a regulated agreement subject to the new provisions of Article L.225-42-1L. 225-42-1 of the French Commercial Code,Code. Accordingly, it was presented for authorization and approved at the annual general shareholders’ meeting of May 11, 2006.



139



Back to Contents


The supplementary retirementpension plan, whose financing is outsourced to an insurance company, has the following characteristics:

·

aA specific regimeplan that takes into account the cancellation following the separation of the groupssupplementary pension plan for the benefit of the Group’s executive managers after the split-up of the Vivendi and Veolia Environnement groups and the loss of the retirement plan from which Group executives benefited untilseniority they had acquired through December 31, 2002 and the acquired seniority as employees of the former principal shareholder of the Company, Compagnie(Compagnie Générale des Eaux, (later namedwhich became Vivendi Universal and thenwas thereafter renamed Vivendi);

·

a retirement benefitAn additional plan that is in addition toseparate from other retirement benefits, acquiredpensions, based on seniority (a minimum of five years’ seniority and two years’ seniority as a functionmember of seniority, which isthe Executive Committee) and capped at 25% of covered compensation (for 25 years ofyears’ seniority);

·

aA limit on total retirement benefits fixedreceived set at 50%a maximum of 50% of covered compensation (the average of the last three periods of compensation).

Salaried management employees and senior executive management acquire a potential right to an annual retirement pension calculated as a percentage of their reference compensation up to an amount equal to sixty times the annual Social Security maximum.

In accordance with legal requirements, the benefits of this supplementary group pension plan are conditioned on the member’s completion of his career, whether he is a salaried management employee or holds a senior executive management position with Veolia Environnement.

In March 2009 (approved by the general shareholders’ meeting of May 7, 2009), the rules and regulations of this plan were amended following the Company’s adoption of provisions bringing it into conformity with the provisions of the AFEP-MEDEF consolidated corporate governance code recommending the termination of the employment contract of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. To ensure that the termination of the employment contracts of senior executive management was not detrimental to them, it was decided to amend the rules and regulations governing this plan in order to clarify the eligibility requirements of this supplementary defined benefits group pension plan for senior executive management, whether or not parties to an employment contract.

After obtaining the opinion of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, at its meetings held on October 21 and December 17, 2009, the Board of Directors decided to make additional amendments to the rules and regulations governing the supplementary defined benefits group pension plan in order inter alia to include as beneficiaries members who permanently end their professional career after the age of 55 without subsequently engaging in other professional activity in accordance with legal requirements, and to entitle the beneficiaries to choose to defer the payment date of their retirement pension after exercising their retirement rights and to choose between the payment of a survivor’s pension to the surviving spouse and the payment of guaranteed annuities to any person of their choice. Lastly, the annual reference compensation is now based on the average of the three most recent compensations received.highest years of gross annual compensation from among the last ten years. However, this reference compensation is limited to sixty times the annual Social Security maximum.



As of December 31, 2006, and based on current estimates, the total cost of this retirement plan (current value of future benefits orValeur Actuelle des Prestations Futures) is expected to amount to €25.7 million for the members of the executive committee, of which €11.5 million relate to the chairman and chief executive officer. This is subject to the beneficiaries’ continued service with our company until the time that they retire, inIn accordance with the provisions of Articles L. 225-38 and L. 225-40 of the French “Fillon” law.  Commercial Code, on the basis of a special report prepared by the statutory auditors, the general shareholders’ meeting to be held on May 7, 2010 will be asked to approve these changes to the extent they concern senior executive management.

The amount booked as provisions (cost of services rendered) for this supplementary group pension plan for 2009 is equal to the amount shown as post-employment benefits in note 39 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements (see below).

Mr. Henri Proglio, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, is no longer a member of this group plan. He chose to exercise his retirement rights on November 1, 2009 after having acquired more than 37 years of seniority within the Group. Due to Henri Proglio’s very lengthy period of service to the Company and the rights acquired as a result of this seniority, as of this date, the annual amount of his lifetime annuity is estimated to be 37% of his annual reference compensation.



140



Back to contentsContents



In accordance with the recommendations of the AFEP-MEDEF consolidated corporate governance code, the value of the benefits provided by the supplementary pension plan is taken into account when setting the Chief Executive Officer’s total compensation. Furthermore, the group of potential beneficiaries is not limited only to senior executive management, but also includes salaried executive managers who are members of the Company’s Executive Committee. Each year, the increase in potential rights is equal to only a limited percentage of the beneficiaries’ compensation. Thus, in the case of the “specific” plan, which takes into account seniority acquired until December 31, 2002 with the Company’s principal shareholder (Compagnie Générale des Eaux, which became Vivendi Universal and was thereafter renamed Vivendi), potential rights represent 0.4% of the beneficiary’s reference compensation per year of seniority. In the case of the “additional” plan, which takes into account seniority acquired after December 31, 2002, potential rights represent 10% of the beneficiary’s reference compensation after five years’ seniority, including at least two years’ seniority as a member of the Company’s Executive Committee, and then 0.75% of his reference compensation per additional year of seniority. The reference period used to calculate benefits is average compensation calculated over several years and excludes compensation paid at the time of employment termination or retirement, as well as any other type of extraordinary compensation. Lastly, provided he is still with the Company at the time of his departure or retirement in accordance with legal requirements, based on his seniority (over 19 years), at the end of December 2009 the hypothetical annual amount of the lifetime annuity of Mr. Antoine Frérot, the Chief Executive Of ficer, is equal to 30% of his annual reference compensation.

Details of the Compensation Paid to Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Principles and criteria used to determine fixed and variable components of the compensation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer before the separation of the offices of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (on November 27, 2009)

In accordance with the recommendation of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, at its meeting held on March 24, 2010, the Board of Directors decided to keep the fixed portion of the compensation paid for the 2009 fiscal year to Mr. Henri Proglio, in his capacity as the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, at the same level as for 2008 and 2007, i.e., €992,000.

In accordance with the recommendation of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, at its meeting held on December 17, 2009, the Board of Directors decided (i) that the fixed portion of the compensation paid to Mr. Henri Proglio for the performance of his duties as the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, would be prorated until the effective date of his appointment as Chairman of the Board of Directors, but (ii) that the variable portion of his compensation for the performance of his duties as the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer would be calculated over the entire 2009 fiscal year.

The method adopted for calculating the variable portion of the compensation of the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for the 2009 fiscal year is in accordance with a proposal made by the Nominations and Compensation Committee. Accordingly, since the 2003 fiscal year, the variable portion of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s compensation has been divided into a quantitative portion of 70%, based on the satisfaction of various performance criteria set beforehand by the Board of Directors, and a qualitative portion of 30% determined by the Board of Directors.

Variable compensation for 2008:

In accordance with the proposals of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, at its meeting held on March 25, 2008, the Board of Directors chose the following performance indicators to determine the quantitative portion of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s variable compensation for 2008, using the 2008 budget and 2008 performances, compared with those for 2007, as the bases for measuring the objectives: operating cash flows, recurring net earnings per share and the Group’s pre-tax ROCE. The 70% quantitative portion of variable compensation is weighted as follows: 30% is based on the Group’s operating cash flows and 40% on net earnings per share and pre-tax ROCE. Applying these formulas and in light of results for 2008, at its meeting of March 24, 2009, the Board of Directors awarded Mr. Henri Proglio €519,188 as the variable portion of his compensatio n for 2008.



141



Back to Contents


Variable compensation for 2009:

In accordance with the proposals of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, at its meeting held on March 24, 2009, the Board of Directors decided to modify the criteria that had been used in 2008 to determine the quantitative portion of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s variable compensation in order to take into account the Group’s objectives and the economic climate. In line with the Group’s objectives announced to the market, which were positive free cash flow and operating cash flow after deduction of net investments of €2 billion in 2009, the sole criteria retained was the Group’s level of operating cash flow after investments, net of sales.

Applying these criteria, and in light of the fact that the objectives set for the 2009 fiscal year had been exceeded, at its meeting of March 24, 2010, the Board of Directors decided to award Mr. Henri Proglio an amount of €1,202,216 for the quantitative and qualitative portions of his variable compensation for 2009.

Principles applied to determine the compensation of senior executive management after the separation of the offices of Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer (since November 27, 2009)

The policy for determining the compensation of senior executive management was changed during the 2009 fiscal year in order to take into account the separation of the offices of Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, which occurred on November 27, 2009.

In accordance with a proposal of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, at its meetings held on December 17, 2009 and March 24, 2010, the Veolia Environnement Board of Directors adopted the following compensation principles and provisions:

Chairman of the Board of Directors

In accordance with the recommendation of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, at its meeting held on December 17, 2009, the Board of Directors decided to pay the Chairman of the Board of Directors fixed annual compensation (without a variable component) in the amount of €450,000, as of the time of his appointment, i.e., November 27, 2009. At that meeting, Mr. Henri Proglio decided to waive the directors’ fees to which he was entitled as a director.

On January 21, 2010, Mr. Henri Proglio stated that he would henceforth also waive payment of his fixed annual compensation.

Chief Executive Officer

Fixed compensation and benefits

Pursuant to a recommendation of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, at its meeting held on December 17, 2009, the Board of Directors decided to set the Chief Executive Officer’s annual fixed compensation at €750,000 as of November 27, 2009, the effective date of his appointment (without any variable portion in that capacity for 2009).

In addition to this compensation, the Chief Executive Officer is entitled to a company car and to social security benefits equivalent to those of employees (sickness, disability). Furthermore, he is eligible for the supplementary defined benefits group pension plan set up in 2006 was determined accordingfor category 9 management employees and senior executive management of Veolia Environnement.

Variable compensation for 2009 and 2010

Pursuant to terms proposeda recommendation of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, at its meeting held on December 17, 2009, the Board of Directors decided that the variable portion of the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation for the 2009 fiscal year would be the variable compensation in connection with his previous position as Chief Executive Officer of the Water Division, calculated over the entire 2009 fiscal year.

The methods used to calculate the variable portion of the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation for the 2010 fiscal year, which were adopted by the nominationsBoard of Directors on March 24, 2010, are discussed below.



142



Back to Contents


Total compensation paid to Mr. Henri Proglio for his positions as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and as Chairman of the Board of Directors

In the 2009 fiscal year, Mr. Henri Proglio was paid compensation committee and approved by our board of directors.

During 2006,totaling €1,509,477. Mr. Proglio received the pro rata share of the fixed portion of his compensation for 20062009 for his position as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (€892,077), as well as the variable portion of his compensation for his position as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for the 20052008 fiscal year, which was paid in 2006, which was determined at2009 pursuant to a decision adopted by the boardBoard of directors’ meeting ofDirectors on March 28, 2006. He also24, 2009 (€519,188). Lastly, he received otherin-kind benefits (avantages en nature), as well as theand directors’ fees for positions held with the Company and with other companies of the Group.

The table below summarizes compensation of all types. Further information concerning stock subscription or purchase options and performance shares are discussed in our Chapter 17 of our Document de Refence filed with the FrenchAutorité des marchés financiers and available on our website. This compensation is detailed in the tables hereinafter.

Table Summarizing Compensation, Options and Shares Granted to which he was entitledMr. Henri Proglio for 2008 and 2009

(in euros)

2008 Fiscal Year

2009 Fiscal Year

Compensation owed for the fiscal year

1,617,207

2,231,790

Value of options granted during the fiscal year

0

0

Value of performance shares granted during the fiscal year

0

0

TOTAL

1,617,207

2,231,790


Table Summarizing Compensation Owed and Paid to Mr. Henri Proglio

 

2008 Fiscal Year

2009 Fiscal Year

 

Amounts owed
for the fiscal year

Amounts paid
during the fiscal year

Amounts owed
for the fiscal year

Amounts paid
during the fiscal year

Fixed compensation (for his position as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer)

992 000

992 000

892 077

892 077

Variable compensation (for his position as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer)

519 188(1)

1 423 020 (2)

1 202 216(3)

519 188

Fixed compensation for his position as Chairman of the Board of Directors

N/A

N/A

39 285

0

Extraordinary compensation

0

0

0

0

Directors’ fees

    

• Paid by Veolia

Environnement

40 000

40 000(4)

40 000

40 000(4)

• Paid by controlled companies(5)

62 969

62 969

55 417

55 417

In-kind benefits(6)

3 050

3 050

2 795

2 795

TOTAL

1,617,207

2,521,039

2,231,790

1,509,477


(1)

Variable portion for 2008, paid in 2009.

(2)

Variable portion for 2007, paid in 2008.

(3)

Variable portion for 2009, to be paid in 2010.

(4)

Directors’ fees paid for his position as director for the fourth quarter of the 2008 fiscal year and the first three quarters of the 2009 fiscal year. Fees for the fourth quarter of the 2009 fiscal year were paid in January 2010.

(5)

Directors’ fees received for director’s positions held with other companies of the Veolia Environnement Group, in France and outside France.

(6)

Company car provided.



143



Back to Contents


Total compensation paid to Mr. Antoine Frérot for his positions as a directorChief Executive Officer of the Water Division and, as of November 27, 2009, Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Environnement (after separation of the offices of Chairman and certainChief Executive Officer)

Pursuant to the principles and criteria adopted by the Board of its subsidiaries.Directors on December 17, 2009, the Chief Executive Officer’s annual fixed compensation was set at €750,000 as of November 27, 2009, the effective date of Mr. Antoine Frérot’s appointment (including €68,453 for 2009 paid in 2010).

The table below summarizes compensation of all types. This compensation is then detailed in the tables hereinafter.

Fixed PortionTable Summarizing Total Compensation, Options and Shares Granted to Mr. Antoine Frérot for 2009

(in euros)

2009 Fiscal Year

Total compensation owed for the fiscal year

858 970

Value of options granted during the fiscal year

0

Value of performance shares granted during the fiscal year

0

TOTAL

858 970


Table Summarizing Compensation Owed and Paid to Mr. Antoine Frérot

 

2009 Fiscal Year

 

Amounts owed
for the fiscal year

Amounts paid
during the fiscal year

Fixed compensation (for his position as Chief Executive Officer of the Water Division)

389 193(1)

425 000

Variable compensation (for his position as Chief Executive Officer of the Water Division)

369 200(3)

184 500(2)

Fixed compensation for his position as Chief Executive Officer of the Company (as of November 27, 2009)

68 453(4)

0(4)

Extraordinary compensation

0

0

Directors’ fees

  

• Paid by Veolia Environnement

0

0

• Paid by controlled companies(5)

30 144

30 144

In-kind benefits(6)

1 980

1 980

TOTAL

858 970

641 624


(1)

For the period between January 1 and November 26, 2009 inclusive.

(2)

Variable portion for 2008, paid in 2009.

(3)

Variable portion for 2009, to be paid in 2010.

(4)

For the period between November 27 and December 31, 2009.

(5)

Directors’ fees received for director’s positions held with other companies of the Veolia Environnement Group, in France and outside France.

(6)

Company car provided.





144



Back to Contents


Compensation of 2006 Compensationthe Chief Executive Officer and Objectives for 2010

The board of directors followedIn accordance with the recommendation of the nominationsNominations and compensation committee, and decided during theCompensation Committee, at its meeting held on March 28, 200624, 2010, the Board of Directors decided to maintain, for the 2010 fiscal year, the fixed portion of Mr. Proglio’sAntoine Frérot’s compensation for the 2006 fiscal year at the same level of that for 2005,set in other words an amount of €945,000.  

Variable Portion of 2006 Compensation

70% ofDecember 2009, i.e., €750,000. To determine the variable portion of compensation is based on the satisfaction of various performance criteria that have been pre-determined by the board of directors, while 30% is based on qualitative performance as determined by the board.

VariableChief Executive Officer’s compensation for 2005: Based on the recommendations2010 fiscal year, the Board of Directors decided to retain the nominations and compensation committee, the boardallocation of directors decided at its meeting of March 29, 2005 that the performance indicators to be used by the board in determining thea quantitative portion of Mr. Proglio’s variable compensation in respect to the 2005 fiscal year (based on IFRS accounts70% and on the objectives of the 2005 budget) would be: the level of return on capital employed and the level of EBIT (recurring operating income), with each indicator carrying a 50% weighting.  At its meeting of March 28, 2006, the board awarded Mr. Proglio €1,062,500, that is 100% of the variablequalitative portion of his compensation for30%.

In line with the 2005 fiscal year, based on its qualitative assessment of his performance as well asGroup’s objectives, which related to cash flow and operating income (in each case subject to certain adjustments) in 2009, the achievement of the performance objectives set forth above.

Variable compensation for 2006: Based on the recommendations of the nominations and compensation committee, the board of directors decided at its meeting of March 28, 2006 that the performance indicators (under IFRS)criteria applied to be used by the board in determiningdetermine the quantitative portion of the chairman and chief executive officer’sChief Executive Officer’s variable compensation are meeting budgetary objectives concerning (i) first, operating cash flow after deducting net investments, adjusted by the positive or negative change in respect toworking capital requirements (weighted at 35%) and (ii) second, the 2006 fiscal year, based on the objectives of the 2006 budget and achievements, would begain in adjusted operating income (weighted at 35%).

Details concerning stock subscription or purchase options that may have been granted to and adjusted net income attributableexercised by the Chief Executive Officer during the 2009 fiscal year, as well as the Chief Executive Officer’s obligation to equity holderskeep the shares obtained by exercising the subscription or purchase options, are described under the headings “Share Subscription and Purchase Options” and “Share Ownership” below.

Details of the parent. options awarded to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and exercised by them in 2009

For the fiscal year 2006, the board of directors decided to replace the criteria for the return of capital employed by the adjusted net income attributable to equity holdersa description of the parent accordingoptions awarded to new accounting standards relating to concessions that will substantially impact the return on capital employed (bringing about an automatic increase of this ratio ). At its meeting of March 29, 2007, the board awarded Mr. Henri Proglio €1,275,000, that is 100%Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and exercised by them in 2009, see “Share Subscription and Purchase Options” below.

Obligations of the variable portionChairman and Chief Executive Officer to retain shares that result from the exercise of his compensation for the 2006 fiscal year, based on application of formulasshare subscription or purchase options (Article L.225-185 and taking into account results obtained.   

Other Benefits

In addition to the fixed and variable compensation described above, Mr. Proglio received benefits in 2006 totaling €2,666, relating to use of a company car.

Directors’ fees paid by Veolia Environnement and its subsidiaries

In 2006, Mr. Proglio received gross directors’ fees from us totaling €38,250, which were paid in respectL.225-197-1 of the last quarter of 2005 and the first three quarters of 2006 (fees due for the last quarter of 2006 were paid in January 2007).  Directors’ fees paid to Mr. Proglio are subject to French taxes (CSG/CRDS deduction) that are withheld from the amounts paid to Mr. Proglio.

Mr. Proglio also received directors’ fees with respect to offices he holds in our subsidiaries in both France and abroad totaling €66,382.




Back to contents



Variation between Mr. Proglio’s Compensation in 2005 and 2006Commercial Code).

The table below sets forth total gross compensation paid to Mr. Proglio in 2005 and 2006 (including fixed and variable compensation, directors’ fees and benefits).


 (in euros)

Various compensation

Directors’ fees paid by subsidiaries

Benefits(1)

Total gross compensation

Fixed

Variable

Directors’ fees paid by VE

Compensation paid in 2005

944,996(2)

850,000(3)

34,000

70,912

2,616

1,902,524

Compensation paid in 2006

944,996(2)

1,062,500(4)

38,250

66,382

2,666

2,114,794

(1)Related to a company car.

(2)The amount approved by the board of directors (€945,000) was rounded when paid.

(3) Variable compensation due in respect of the 2004 fiscal year and paid in 2005.

(4) Variable compensation due in respect of the 2005 fiscal year and paid in 2006.


Retirement Plan

Mr. Proglio benefits from a collective supplementary retirement plan with a fixed subscription (cotisations définies) that we provides to our senior management, and the collective supplementary retirement plan with defined benefits (prestations définies) put in place by our company as of the 2006 fiscal year for our chairman and chief executive officer and the members of the Executive Committee described above.

Obligations concerning share subscription and share purchase options granted to the president and chief executive officer and granting of free shares.

The law of December 30, 2006, relating to the development of the participation of employees in stock ownership plans, introduced new measures included in article L.225-185 of the French Commercial Code, regarding share subscription options or share purchase options granted to legal representatives. The boardBoard of directorsDirectors must decide whether the options cannot be exercised by the parties before the end of their functions, or must fix the quantity of shares held following the exercise of options which they have to conserve until the end of their functions. The same constraints are applicable to shares granted freely to the chairmanChairman and chief executive officerChief Executive Officer under Article L.225-197-1 of the Commercial Code. These provisions are applicable to plans implemented after the law cameentered into effect.force.

Following the publication of this law, the nominationsNominations and remuneration committee undertookCompensation Committee performed a review of the provisions that may be applied to the next stock option plan for the benefit of the chairmanChairman and chief executive officer,Chief Executive Officer, and presented its conclusions to the boardBoard on March 29, 2007.

According toIn accordance with these recommendations, the boardBoard adopted internal rules pursuant to which Henri ProgolioProglio will have to form and retain a portfolio of our shares in proportion to the excess value, net of tax and financing, realized on the exercised options. In accordance with these regulations,rules, the presidentChairman and chief executive officerChief Executive Officer will hold a portfolio of the Company’s shares equal to 50% of the remaining shares issued by virtue of the exercise, after payment of taxes (taxation of the exercise value and corporate payments)social security withholding) and the financing cost of financing (number of options which it is necessary to exercise to finance the exercise price of the portfolio)portfolio and tax).

BecauseThis rule has not been applied in practice, as no options or bonus shares have been awarded since 2007.

The Board will study the policynew terms of granting free shares decided by our boardapplication now that the offices of directors during its meeting of March 29, 2007 did not include the granting of any sharesChairman and Chief Executive Officer are separated, if options are effectively awarded to the chairman and chief executive officer,Chief Executive Officer in the board did not define, for the chairman and chief executive officer any restrictions such as those applicablefuture.



145



Back to share subscription or purchase options.     Contents


BOARD PRACTICES


Following our transformationAfter the Company was converted into asociété anonyme à conseil d’administrationwith a Board of Directors on April 30, 2003, our existing accounts, auditthe Accounts and commitments committeeAudit Committee and nominationsthe Nominations and compensation committeeCompensation Committee, and their respective internal rules and regulations, were retained and their charters adaptedmodified to meet the needsrequirements of the Company’s new boardBoard of directorsDirectors. In addition, at its meeting of our company.September 14, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors created the Strategy, Research, Innovation and Sustainable Development Committee.

Accounts and audit committeeAudit Committee

The accounts, auditduties of the Accounts and commitments committee was renamedAudit Committee, which take into account changes in U.S. laws and regulations concerning the “accountsassessment of internal controls of financial and audit committee”accounting information, were changed by the Board of Directors at the board of directors’its meeting of March 9, 2006; its missions as described in its charter were updated during the committee meeting of May 11, 2006 in order24, 2009 to take into account evolutions in U.S. regulations relatingthe Order (“ordonnance”) of December 8, 2008 that transposed the eighth directive on statutory audits of corporate financial statements into French law (directive 2006/43/EC), which will apply to the evaluationCompany as of internal controls on financial and accounting information.  September 1, 2010.

The committee consists ofAccounts and Audit Committee has three to five members appointed along with its Chairman, by our boardthe Board of directors based onDirectors pursuant to a recommendation made by the recommendationNominations and Compensation Committee. The Board appoints the Committee Chairman.

As of the nominationsdate of this annual report on Form 20-F, this Committee has four independent members in accordance with the requirements of the Board’s internal rules and compensation committee.




Back to contents



The committee consists of three members,1 two of whom are independent (*) under the board’s charter2: Murray Stuart (*) (chairman)regulations: Daniel Bouton (Chairman), Pierre-André de Chalendar,
Jean-Marc Espalioux (*) and Paul-Louis Girardot.

The Board of Directors appointed Pierre-André de Chalendar as a member of the Accounts and Audit Committee effective May 7, 2009. Daniel Bouton was appointed a member of the Accounts and Audit Committee effective November 2, 2009, and he was appointed Chairman effective January 1, 2010, to replace Murray Stuart, who resigned his office as director effective December 31, 2009.

According to the committee’s charter,internal rules and regulations of the Accounts and Audit Committee, its members mustare required to be selectedchosen on the basis of their financial or accounting skills. At its meetingsexpertise and at least one Committee member must have specific financial or accounting expertise and be independent under the criteria specified in the Board’s internal rules and regulations. The Board of March 5, 2004Directors deemed Jean-Marc Espalioux and March 29, 2005, the board of directors determined that Messrs. Espalioux,Paul-Louis Girardot and Stuart qualified as “audit committeeto be financial experts”experts within the meaning of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act, taking into account theiron the grounds that they possessed the expertise and experience and skills.required by that law. All of the Committee’s members are considered to be independent under the criteria set forth in the New York Stock Exchange Manual.

The accountsAccounts and audit committeeAudit Committee meets at the initiative of its Chairman or at the request of the Chairman of the Board of Directors, and at least five times pera year, at the request of its chairman or the chairman of the board of directors in order to review the semi-annualperiodic and annual financial statements before their presentationthey are submitted to the boardBoard of directors.Directors. In 2006,2009, the committeeAccounts and Audit Committee met seven times including one meeting held by telecommunication(the same number of times as in comformity with2008). In 2009, its charter.  Themembers’ average attendance level at meetingsrate was 92.0% (compared to 85.7% in 2006 was 71.43%2008).



146



Back to Contents


Duties

The accountsIn general, the Accounts and audit committee principally performsAudit Committee is responsible for monitoring issues concerning the following functions:preparation and control of accounting and financial information and, in particular, for monitoring the integrity of the Group’s financial statements and the process for preparing financial information, as well as the effectiveness of internal control and risk management systems concerning financial and accounting information. In this regard, the duties of the Committee are:

·

Regarding accounting matters, the committee reviewsCommittee, (i) together with the statutory auditors, reviews the appropriatenessrelevance and consistency of the accounting methods adoptedused to prepare the corporate and consolidated financial statements, and examines whether significantmajor transactions have beenare adequately treated, providesreported on a Group-wide level and reviews the procedures for collecting financial and accounting information; (ii) gives an opinion on the draft semi-annual and annual corporate and consolidated financial statements,statements; and meets,(iii) if necessary, withinterviews the statutory auditors, executive management and the financial officers to discuss various issues,officers. If the committee being entitled to meet with such persons outside ofCommittee wishes, these interviews may be held without the presence of the Company’s executive management.

·

Regarding internal auditing, internal controls and internal control,risk management, the committee examinesCommittee (i) reviews the Group’s internal audit plan and, from time to time, receives a periodic summary of our group’sthe Group’s internal audit reports; in connection(ii) with therespect to its evaluation of internal control procedures (cf. section(see Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley law)Act), from time to time, the committee periodicallyCommittee receives information from our company information regarding the Company concerning its internal control organization and the internal control procedures relating toregarding financial information and accounting; the committee meets when necessaryaccounting information; (iii) interviews with the internal audit director to discussand internal control managers and it gives its opinion on the organizationmanner in which this work is organized; and (iv) receives an annual report from the Ethics Committee regarding the operation of internal audit.the financial and accounting whistleblowing system and, in conjunction with the Ethics Committee, ensures oversight of significant matters.

·

Regarding the supervision of our company’sCompany’s independent auditors, the committee examinesCommittee (i) reviews on an annual basis the statutory auditors’ work plan and meets as necessary withplanned work; (ii) interviews the statutory auditors and our company’s management, including itsthe managers in charge of finances, accounting and treasury officers.  The committee is entitled to meet with such persons outsidethe cash position, in certain cases, without the presence of our company’s management.  Any permissible non-audit services to be performedthe Company’s executive management; (iii) supervises the procedure for choosing statutory auditors and makes recommendations thereon; (iv) gives its opinion regarding the amount of fees requested by the auditors require thestatutory auditors; (v) gives its prior approval to activities of the committee, which also reviewsstatutory auditors that are strictly ancillary or directly complementary to their audit of the financial statements; and (vi) is informed of the fees our company paysthat the Company and the Group pay to the auditors for all of their servicesstatutory auditor firm and assuresnetwork, ensures that the amount of these feespayments does not call into question the independenceindepend ence of the auditors.  The committee also supervises the procedure for selectingstatutory auditors and, if necessary, reviews measures taken to reduce threats to the statutory auditors.  auditors’ independence.

Activities during 2006in 2009

During 2006,In 2009, as in previous years, the committee completedwork of the Accounts and Audit Committee was organized on the basis of an annual program. Minutes of its work withinmeetings are prepared and the framework of a 12-month program and regularly reportedCommittee Chairman reports thereon to the boardBoard of directors. Directors.

In addition to examining our company’sreviewing the semi-annual and annual financial statements, the committeereference document and the quarterly business reports, the Committee periodically reviewed the action plans regarding internal controls set up in 20062009 and the implementionprogress of the IFRIC 12 interpretation relating towork undertaken by the accounting treatment of concessions (2005 pro forma accounts an deployment for 2006 accounts).  The committee periodically reviewed plans of action enacted by our companyCompany in 2009 to evaluate its internal controls that must be effected pursuant tocontrol procedures, in accordance with the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act as a U.S.-listed company in respectprovisions of Section 404 of the 2006Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The Committee reviewed the summaries of the internal audits conducted in 2008 and the first half of 2009 and approved the internal audit program for 2010. In addition, together with the Company’s managers, the Committee reviewed the key processes relevant to its duties: cash position and financing, off-balance sheet commitments, taxes, lawyers’ reports concerning major disputes and IT systems. The Committee was also regularly informed of the progress of the deployment of the SAP management and internal control software. The Committee approved the duties of the statutory auditors for the 2009 fiscal year and onward,the amount budgeted for their advancement, and engaged infees. The Committee performed a financial review of the synthesisEnvironmental Services Division, and examined the tests for depreciating assets, fraud reports and the report on the work of the 2006 internal audit missionsEthics Committee. Financial management made a presentation to the Committee regarding changes in accounting regulations, the control and investment planning processes and the 2007Group’s financing policy. The Committee examined possible changes to its duties following the regulation (“ordonnance”) dated December 8, 2008. The Committee proposed to the Board of Directors to amend its internal audit program. The committee also approvedrules and regulations and examined the duties and fees of our company’s auditors for 2006 and supervised the process through which KPMG SA was appointed statutory auditor, succeeding Salustro Reydel, whose mandate expired as of the shareholders’ meeting of May 10, 2007, as well as the rotation of partners of our statutory audit firms.Group’s updated whistleblowing procedure.



147



Back to Contents


The committeeCommittee may meet with individuals and expertsinterview persons outside our companythe Company if necessary.it deems such interviews of use to the performance of its duties. In addition, the Committee may consult outside experts. It may also meet with our company’sinterview the Company’s financial officers or the statutory auditors outsidewithout the presence of the chairman and chief executive officer.Chief Executive Officer. Accordingly, during 2006 the chairmanpast fiscal year, the Chairman of the committeeAccounts and Audit Committee and/or the Committee members interviewed and met and communicated regularly with our company’s chief executive officer, the directorChief Finance Officer, the manager of control and synergies,the finance department, the financial control manager, the risks and markets manager, the financing and cash position manager, the internal controls manager, the Group’s internal audit manager, the Secretary General, the legal director, the risk and internal audit director, the general counsel, the director of financial transactions and some of the chief financial officers of the Divisions,management manager and the statutory auditors. The committeeCommittee did not consult with anyuse outside consultants in 2006.

1

Because of his workload, Mr. Jean Azéma asked to be dismissed from his position as member of the committee on January 3, 2007.

2

All of these committee members are independent according to the criteria set forth in The New York Stock Exchange’s Listed Company Manual.




Back to contents



2009.

Nominations and compensation committeeCompensation Committee

The nominationsIn accordance with its internal rules and compensation committee’s charter provides thatregulations, the committeeNominations and Compensation Committee must consist ofhave between three toand five members, who are appointed along with its chairman, by the boardBoard of directors upon the recommendationDirectors pursuant to a proposition of the then currentNominations and Compensation Committee. The Committee members are appointed from among the directors who do not hold management positions. The Chairman of the nominations and compensation committee.  Committee is appointed by the Board.

The committee consistsAs of the date of this annual report on Form 20-F, this Committee has three members, two of whom are independent (*) underon the board’s charter:basis of the criteria set forth in the Board’s internal rules and regulations: Serge Michel (chairman)(Chairman), Daniel Bouton (*) and Louis Schweitzer* and Daniel Bouton*Schweitzer (*).

The nominationsNominations and compensation committeeCompensation Committee meets at least two times per yearthe initiative of its Chairman or at the request of its chairman or the chairmanChairman of the boardBoard of directors. In 2006, the committee met twice. The average attendance level at meetings in 2005 was 100%.

Duties

The nominationsDirectors, and compensation committee principally performs the following functions:

·

Regarding compensation, the committee studies and makes annual recommendations on the compensation of directors and executive officers and with respect to retirement and other benefits. The committee also proposes a total amount and breakdown for the fees paid to directors, and advises the board of directors on stock option policy and awards. The committee is also informed of the compensation policy for the principal executive officers of our company’s subsidiaries, and examines all share capital increases reserved for employees.  

·

Regarding nominations, the nominations and compensation committee makes recommendations on our directors and senior managers and arrange for their succession. It also recommends the nomination of members and a chairman for each of our committees.  The committee’s choices must strive to reflect a diversity of experience and points of view and assure that the board remains objective and independent with respect to a shareholder or group of shareholders.  The committee must ensure that independent directors represent at least half oftwice a year. In 2009, the members of the board of directors, two-thirds of the members of the accountsNominations and audit committee and half of the members of the nominations and compensation committee.


Each year, the nominations and compensation committee performs an evaluation on a case-by-case basis of the independence of each directorCompensation Committee met eight times (compared to two times in light of the criteria for independence mentioned in the board of directors’ charter and submits its proposals to the board of directors.  It also organizes and coordinates the required evaluation of the board’s functioning, and submits its opinion regarding the performance of executive management.

To perform its duties, the committee may interview different members of our company’s or group’s management.

Activities during 2006

In 2006, the nominations and compensation committee’s work was principally dedicated to providing recommendations and proposals to the board relating to the compensation of the chairman and chief executive officer and members of our executive committee (2006 fixed components and 2005 variable components), to the total amount and breakdown of directors’ fees and to board member independence.

The committee also submitted to the board of directors its findings and recommendations relating to the shareholder resolutions of May 11, 2006 in the area of employee shareholding, stock option awards and granting of free shares, and provided an analysis of the improvements made to the board’s functioning.

In addition, in light of the expiration of terms of half of the board of directors in 2006, the committee made proposals to the board of directors meeting held of March 28, 2006 relating to the renewal of the mandate of six directors and the nomination of a new director, and made recommendations relating to the appointment (cooptation) of Paolo Scaroni during the board of directors meeting held on December 12, 2006.

Strategic research, innovation and sustainable development committee

At its meeting held on September 14, 2006, the board of directors of our Company created a strategic research, innovation and sustainable development committee, along with a committee charter.

This committee has three to five members, appointed by the board of directors based on recommendations of the nominations and compensation committee.  The chairman of the committee is appointed by the board of directors based on a recommendation of the chairman of the board.

The committee is composed of three members appointed by the board of directors on September 14, 2006, of which one is independent (*): Mssrs. Philippe Kourilsky (chairman), Paul-Louis Girardot and Jean-Marc Espalioux (*)2008).

Pursuant to the committee charter, the committee meets at the request of its chairman or the chairman of the board of directors.  It meets at least three times per year.  Between the date of its creation and the end of the fiscal year of December 31, 2006, the committee met a total of three times. The Its members’ average attendance rate was 100%.

Duties

The committee’s mission ismain duties of the Nominations and Compensation Committee are:

With respect to evaluate “researchcompensation, the Committee (i) studies and development”makes recommendations regarding the total compensation of corporate managers that are directors and, “sustainable development” policies proposed byin particular, ensures that the senior managementrules and criteria governing the variable portion of compensation are consistent with the annual evaluation of their performances and the medium-term strategy and performance of the Company and the Group, as well as regarding the granting of in-kind corporate benefits, stock purchase or subscription options and advisefree shares, pension plans, termination compensation and any other benefits to corporate managers that are directors, ensuring that all of these components are taken into account in evaluating and setting their overall compensation; (ii) proposes a total amount of directors’ fees to be paid to the boardBoard of Directors, as well as the rules for the distribution thereof; (iii) advises Bo ard of Directors regarding the general policy and terms and conditions for granting stock purchase or subscription options, granting free shares and setting up employee stock ownership plans, as well as the provisions for sharing the performances of the Company or Group with employees; (iv) makes recommendations to the Board concerning the granting of stock options and, if applicable, free shares to corporate officers, as well as with respect to the performance conditions applicable thereto; (v) makes recommendations to the Board concerning the obligation of corporate managers that are directors to keep shares obtained by exercising stock purchase or subscription options or, if applicable, free shares granted to them; and (vi) gives its opinion regarding the compensation paid to the Company’s principal managers who are not also directors of the Company or of other companies of the Group.

With respect to nominations, the Committee is charged with making recommendations regarding the future composition of the Company’s management bodies and, most importantly, is responsible for proposing corporate officers and a succession plan. It recommends the appointment of directors, as well as the members and Chairman of each Committee of the Board, striving to ensure diversity in experience and points of view, while making certain that the Board of Directors retains the necessary objectivity and independence vis-à-vis any specific shareholder or group of shareholders. The Committee gives its opinion on the succession plan for the Company’s principal managers who are not directors. The Nominations and Compensation Committee strives to ensure that at least (i) one-half of the Board of Directors, (ii) two-thirds of the members of the Accounts and Audit Committee and ( iii) one-half of the members of the Nominations and Compensation Committee are independent directors. Each year, the Nominations and Compensation Committee conducts a case-by-case evaluation of each of the directors with regard to the independence criteria as set forth in the Board of Directors’ internal rules and regulations and makes recommendations on this subject to the Board of Directors in advance of the Board’s review of the situation of each director.



148



Back to contentsContents



The Nominations and Compensation Committee assists the Board in its periodic evaluation work. It prepares the Board’s annual evaluation of its organization and operations and conducts the formal evaluation of the Board that is carried out every three years by an outside organization. Each year, the Committee provides the Board of Directors with a report evaluating the performances of the Chairman and of the directors, as well as the actions of executive management, which the Board discusses. Lastly, each year, the principal corporate managers that are not directors have a meeting with each member of the Committee.

Activities in 2009

In 2009, the work of the Nominations and Compensation Committee was devoted to: the adoption by the Board of the AFEP-MEDEF code, as amended in 2008, and the implementation thereof; the reduction in the duration of the term of office of directors; the termination of the employment contract of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and, then, of the Chief Executive Officer; the separation of the positions of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the granting of termination compensation to the Chief Executive Officer; amendments to the rules and regulations of the complementary defined benefits pension plan (corporate managers that are members of the Executive Committee); the creation of the position of Vice-Chairman; the appointment of two new directors; the appointment of an additional member to the Accounts and Audit Committee and the replacement of that Committee’s C hairman; the preparation of proposals and recommendations to the Board concerning the compensation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Committee (setting the variable portion of compensation for 2008 and the fixed portion for 2009, criteria for calculating the variable portion for 2009) and the compensation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer after the separation of this position into two positions; the review of proposals concerning the compensation of members of the Executive Committee; giving an opinion on the policy with respect to granting stock options and setting up group-wide employee savings plans; the informal evaluation of the operation of the Board of Directors and its Committees; the evaluation of the independence of the directors; the distribution of directors’ fees and the revision of the rules for distributing the variable portion of directors’ fees; and the revision of the internal rules and regulations of the Board of Directors and of the Nominati ons and Compensation Committee.

Strategy, Research, Innovation and Sustainable Development Committee

At its meeting on September 14, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors created a Strategy, Research, Innovation and Sustainable Development Committee and adopted its internal rules and regulations.

This Committee has three to five members, who are appointed by the Board of Directors pursuant to recommendations made by the Nominations and Compensation Committee. The Chairman of the Committee is appointed by the Board of Directors on the basis of a proposal made by the Chairman of the Board.

As of the date of this annual report on Form 20-F, this Committee had three members, who were appointed by the Board of Directors on September 14, 2006, two of whom are independent (*): Messrs. Philippe Kourilsky (Chairman), Paul-Louis Girardot (*) and Jean-Marc Espalioux (*).

In accordance with the Committee’s internal rules and regulations, this Committee meets at the initiative of its Chairman or at the request of the Chairman of the Board of Directors. It is keptrequired to hold at least three meetings per year. During the 2009 fiscal year, the Committee met seven times (compared with eight times in 2008). Its members’ average attendance rate was 85.7% (compared with an attendance rate of 91.7% in 2008).

Duties

The duties of the Committee are to assess the research and development and sustainable development strategies and policies proposed by the departments of the Company and Group responsible therefore and to provide its opinion thereon to the Board of Directors.

The Committee must be informed of programs and high-prioritypriority actions that have been engagedundertaken and it evaluates the results.results thereof. In particular, it evaluateskeeps abreast of budgets manpower, and advises onstaff levels and gives its opinion regarding the allocation of means and resources and their adequacy for the strategies pursued.whether they are appropriate in light of strategic choices made.

The committee principally communicates withCommittee’s main contacts are the chairmanCompany’s Chairman of the boardBoard of directors, seniorDirectors, executive management and Executive Committee, the Company’s executive committee, the “researchGroup’s research and development”development and “sustainable development”sustainable development departments, of the Group as well as all executivesany other manager within the Company whose inputwho has information or opinions that may be usefulof use to it.the Committee.

The Committee may also hear third partiesinterview persons outside of the Company whose participation may be useful forif it deems such interviews of use to the accomplishmentperformance of its missions.  Itduties. In addition, the Committee may consult with outside experts as needed.experts.



149



Back to Contents


Activities during 2006in 2009

In 2006,2009, the committee’s activity was principally devotedCommittee oversaw the implementation of a new organization within the Group in the fields of research, innovation and competition monitoring, focusing, in particular, revolving around the structure dedicated to the realization of approximately thirty conferences and discussions with the group’s managers, including the directors of the divisions, the director of the development and technology research department and the director of sustainable development, and conducted an initial analysis and assessment of the current outlook forGroup research and development activities known as Veolia Environnement Research and Innovation (“VERI”). The Committee analyzed and made recommendations on the research and development budget and the preparation and implementation of innovation within our group.strategies. The initial conclusionsCommittee interviewed the heads of the committee, which were communicatedfour Divisions and their teams, as well as the managers of VERI, the industrial markets and new business sectors manager and the IT systems manager. The Committee also monitored progress made with respect to industrialization and the sharing of knowledge and expertise within the Group and made recommendations thereon. The Committee presented a report on its work to the board, focused on innovation and defining the principal expected areasBoard of focus for the 2007 fiscal year.Directors’s meeting of December 17, 2009.

Committees created by management

Disclosure committeeCommittee

The Disclosure Committee was created by the Chairman of the management board and the Company’s Chief Finance Officer on December 11, 2002, the date on which the proposal to create such Committee was submitted to the Company’s management board. The meetings of the Committee are chaired by the Chief Executive Officer.

In addition to the committees above, our Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer created a disclosure committee (comité de communication), which was presented to our company’s former management board (directoire) on December 11, 2002.  The chief executive officer or, in his absence,Chief Executive Officer, the senior executive vice president presides over meetings of the disclosure committee.  

In addition to the chief executive officer and the senior executive vice president, the permanent members of the committee includeDisclosure Committee are the headsmembers of the Company’s Executive Committee, the Company’s Chief Finance Officer, the Secretary General, the finance managers of each of our company’s divisions (water, energy services, waste management and transportation)Division and the principal executive officersmanagers of our company’s corporatethe Company’s major centralized departments.

PursuantAccording to its charter,internal rules and regulations, the disclosure committee principally: (i) overseesprincipal duties of the Disclosure Committee are to oversee the implementation of internal procedures of collectionfor collecting and control of information about our company that will be disclosed to the public; (ii) defines the process for preparing our company’s reports and other communications; (iii) examines theverifying information to be disclosedmade public by the Company, to define the procedures for preparing and approvesdrafting reports and communications, to review information communicated and to approve the final version of draft reports orand communications, in particular the U.S. Form 20-F, whichthat are to be filed with the French and American regulatory authorities; and (iv) approvesU.S. stock exchange authorities, as well as to review the procedures for publicationmanner in which they are published, filed or filing of these documents.registered.

The disclosure committee reports onDisclosure Committee meets as often as is necessary to perform its work to the chief executive officerduties and, the senior executive vice president.in any event, at least twice a year. It meets as appropriate to assure the accomplishment of its mission, but at least two times each year, including (i) oncefirst before the end of each year to organize and launchinitiate the process of drafting of our company’s Frenchthe reference document and annual report on Form 20-F for the past fiscal year, and (ii) prior to the filing of the annual report onit meets again before Form 20-F is filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in order to evaluate and validateapprove the content of this report. The disclosure committeeIf necessary, the Committee may also meet before the announcement of any significant event.events.

The disclosure committeeDisclosure Committee met twice in 2006.  During2009. At its June 7, 2006 meeting of April 9, it evaluatedreviewedinter aliathe procedures followed in preparing and validated our company’s annual report onapproving Form 20-F before it was filed with the SEC on April 16, 2009, as well as the certificationscertificates required to be furnishedprovided by its chief executive officerthe -Chief Executive Officer and senior executive vice presidentthe Chief Finance Officer in accordance with U.S. regulatory provisions.regulations. At its meeting of December 20, 2006 meeting,17, 2009, the disclosure committeeDisclosure Committee principally reviewed recent regulatory developments relating to reportsthat could have an impact on the communication and other communications designedpublication of information intended for public disclosure. It also reviewed the comments we had received frommarket, in particular through the SEC relating to our company’s 2005reference document and Form 20-F, as well as our company’s response thereto. Finally, it launchedand initiated the process of collecting information and preparing for drafts of itsthe annual reports for the 20062009 fiscal year required by regulatory authorities.year.

Ethics committeeCommittee

In February 2003, we implemented an ethics program entitled “Ethics, CommitmentThe Ethics Committee was created by Veolia Environnement’s Executive Committee in March 2004. It has three to five members who are chosen by the Company’s Executive Committee. The Committee elects a Chairman from among its members. The Chairman has no more powers than the other members, except the power to break a tie in the event of a tie vote.

As of the date of this annual report on Form 20-F, the Committee has three permanent members and Responsibility,”one alternate. The Committee’s members are present at the Company on a daily basis.

Membership on the Committee is open to employees, former employees or persons outside the Company. Members are chosen from among applicants who are familiar with the Group’s businesses and who have a professional position that guarantees the independent judgment and perspective necessary for the position.

The Committee’s decisions are made by a majority vote. Its members are subject to a strict confidentiality obligation and are not authorized to disclose outside the Company the position they hold. To guarantee their ability to exercise their judgment objectively, they receive no instructions from the Company’s executive management and they cannot be dismissed during their term of office (which is four years and which was updated in December 2004.can be renewed).



150



Back to Contents


The Committee may seek assistance from designated contact persons within each Division. This program is intended to guidelocal presence has become particularly important since 2009 when the daily behavior of our employeesCompany began appointing managers with respect to ethical matters.geographical responsibilities.

In March 2004, we createdaccordance with its internal rules and regulations, the duties of the Ethics Committee are to make recommendations regarding the fundamental values of Veolia Environnement concerning subjects it has chosen itself or in response to questions presented to it.

Accordingly, in 2009, the Ethics Committee continued the major review of labor standards within the Group that it initiated in 2008, which led it inter alia to carry out visits to countries where labor is less well protected than elsewhere.

In order to stay closely informed of the Group’s operations, the Committee seeks to increase its contacts with all groups of persons that may benefit from its services. These contacts range from attendance at certain seminars in France or outside France that gather certain targeted groups to individual interviews.

In 2009, the Committee also continued its practice of holding meetings with each member of the Company’s executive management, a practice it plans to continue each year.

The Ethics Committee may carry out “ethics audits” with regard to any of the Group’s operations, in France and outside France. The principal purpose of such audits is to assess, through individual interviews with a sample that is as representative as possible of the site visited, the level of employees’ understanding of ethics issues, their familiarity with the Group’s values, the ethical problems they may encounter, and the training they receive from their supervisors or provide to their employees on the subject.

Furthermore, the Ethics Committee is the body that receives and investigates alerts by Group employees regarding breaches of the code of conduct, in particular those in the Group’s “Ethics, Commitments and Responsibility” program. This is known as the whistleblowing procedure. The Committee has all necessary authority to perform these duties. It can interview all employees of the Group, the statutory auditors and any third party. It can also request the assistance of Veolia Environnement’s internal audit department or use the services of outside experts. It has access to all sites or companies of the Group.

In 2009, as in previous years, the Committee received few major alerts concerning ethical issues. The Committee continues to note that there is a significant difference between Anglo-American countries, where this system operates without difficulty, and the rest of the world, where this procedure is not a part of the culture. Therefore, the Committee has initiated an ethics committeeinternal communication program to examinemake its role better known and settle any questions relatingto inform all Group employees of their right to bring a matter before the Committee if all natural problem resolution avenues have already been tried unsuccessfully.

As it does every year, in 2009, the Committee reported on its work to the ethics program. The ethics committee has three membersAccounts and may pursue any matter that it wishes regarding group ethics. Employees may also freely consult with the committee. The ethics committee must act independently with respect to matters it treatsAudit Committee and hold the information relating thereto confidential.

Pursuant to the “whistleblowing” provision of Article 301 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the ethics committee isExecutive Committee, describing matters on which it was satisfied and areas in charge of receiving and handling, in coordination with the accounts and audit committee, all employee inquiries relating to accounting, auditing or internal control matters.  On June 14, 2005, the accounts and audit committee approved the set of procedures to be followed for handling and following up on these employee inquiries.which future action was desirable.



151



Back to contentsContents



EMPLOYEES

Employee Information

The corporate information below has been drawnis taken from an international database, which we have worked onbeen developing since 2001. This database includes, for all of the companies in our Group whose results are fully or proportionally consolidated for accounting purposes, approximately 200 corporate indicators, that yield more than one hundred corporate indicators, yielding more than 150,000270,000 pieces of data per year, which can be sorted by company, country and geographical area or region.  All companies within our group whose results are either fully or proportionally consolidated for accounting purposes are included in this database.

The main corporatesalient indicators drawn from the international database are presented below under different subheadings. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such figures, in particular in the case of averages, since the figures below are often aggregated across all parts of the world, and may require more detailed analysis at the level of the specificrelevant geographic area, country or business concerned.business.

Total Number of Employees


As of December 31, 2006,2009, we had 298,498312,590 employees, an increasea decrease of 10.08% (27,3456.97% (24,423 employees) over 271,153336,013 employees as of December 31, 2005.2008.

The following table shows the distribution of Veolia Environnement’s employees by activity and geographic location as of December 31, 2006:2009:


Water*

Environmental Services*

Energy Services

Transportation

Total

%

Water*

Environmental
Services*

Energy
Services

Transportation

Total

%

Europe

53,281

56,866

41,395

61,499

213,510**

71.53%

59,538

54,165

40,026

55,807

210,589**

67.38%

Of which metropolitan France


28,862


33,691


19,287


30,308


112,617**


37.73%

of which metropolitan France

30,483

23,705

15,396

29,887

100,524**

32.16%

North America

3,162

10,752

45

14,996

28,955

9.70%

3,874

9,549

628

14,116

28,167

9.01%

South America

2,861

6,646

6,093

1,371

16,971

5.69%

4,801

7,352

6,962

1,030

20,145

6.44%

Africa/Middle East

7,771

7,113

701

344

15,929

5.34%

8,412

8,546

1,405

3,313

21,676

6.93%

Asia/Pacific

10,766

8,125

555

3,687

23,133

7.75%

19,164

5,988

3,536

3,325

32,013

10.24%

Total

77,841

89,502

48,789

81,897

298,498**

100%

95,789

85,600

52,557

77,591

312,590**

100%

%

26.08%

29.98%

16.34%

27.44%

100%

 

31%

27%

17%

25%

100%

 

* Proactiva’s employees (8,082 employees) have been divided according to activity, between water (1,975 employees) and waste services (6,107 employees).

** The total number for France includes 469 employees who work at the Company's headquarters and at the Veolia Environnement Campus.


*

Proactiva’s employees (10,656 employees) have been divided according to activity, between Water (3,633 employees) and Environmental Services (7,023 employees).

**

The total number for France includes 1,053 employees who work at our Company’s headquarters (VE SA, VERI and VEIT), at the Centre d’Analyses Environnementales and at the Veolia Environnement Campus.


*

Proactiva’s employees (10,656 employees) have been divided according to activity, between Water (3,633 employees) and Environmental Services (7,023 employees).

**

The total number for France includes 1,053 employees who work at our Company’s headquarters (VE SA, VERI and VEIT), at the Centre d’Analyses Environnementales and at the Veolia Environnement Campus.


As ofAt December 31, 2006, 37.73%2009, 32.16% of our employees werethe Veolia Environnement total headcount was located in France, 33.80%35.22% in the rest of Europe, 9.70%10.24% in North Americathe Asia/Pacific region and 18.77%22.38% in the rest of the world.

Breakdown of employees by type of contract and by category

As ofAmong the 312,590 employees managed by the Company at December 31, 2006, we employed 278,597 persons (representing 93.3% of its employees) under indefinite term employment2009, 292,223 (93%) held indefinite-term contracts and 19,901 persons under20,367 held fixed-term employment contracts. During 2006, 7,6892009, 5,961 fixed-term employment contracts were converted into indefinite term employmentindefinite-term contracts (or 38.6%(29.2%). As ofAmong the employees managed by Veolia Environnement at December 31, 2006, 24,007 of our employees (or8.0% of total employees)2009, 28,580 (9.1%) were managers 274,491(cadres), and 284,010 were non-managerial employees, and 59,146 werenon-managers. The headcount comprised 62,337 women, (or 19.8%representing 19.9% of the total employees).number of employees.

In France, among the 112,896100,818 employees as ofmanaged at December 31, 2006 (including 279 employees in Réunion), 106,273 (or 94.1%2009, 95,794 (95%) were employed under indefinite term employmentheld indefinite-term contracts and 6,623 under5,024 held fixed-term employment contracts. During 2006, 2,7352009, 1,970 fixed-term contracts were converted into indefinite termindefinite-term contracts (or 41.3%(39.2%). Of ourAmong the employees in France, 12,497 (or 11.1%managed by Veolia Environnement, 13,141 (13%) were managers, 100,399and 87,677 were non-managerial employees and 23,753 (or 21.0%non-managers. The headcount comprised 19,690 women (19.5%) were women..

Weighted average annual number of employees

This figureheadcount corresponds to the equivalent number of employees that weVeolia Environnement would have had if the latterthese employees had all been workingworked full time duringthroughout the entire year. It is calculated by weighting the total number of employeesheadcount against both the employment rate and the amount of time worked by each employee. In 2006, our weighted average number2009, this headcount was 296,120.6 employees, of employees was 268,746.1, of which 252,728.3 (or 94.0%whom 278,223.4 (94%) were employed under indefinite term employmentheld indefinite-term contracts.



152



Back to Contents


In France, the weighted average numberannual headcount in 2009 was 97,568.9 employees, of employees during 2006 was 105,490, of which 99,428 (or 94.3%whom 92,893.9 (95.2%) were employed under indefinite term employmentheld indefinite-term contracts.

Consolidated weighted average annual number of employees




Back to contents



This figure is calculated by weighting the average annual number of employees of consolidated companies against the level of consolidation of such companies. In 2006,2009, the consolidated weighted average number of employees was 260,088.  291,000.

Temporary employeesOptional and mandatory profit-sharing

In France, in 2009, the total amount paid in respect of optional profit-sharing was €68,810,823 (€62,361,750 in 2008) and the amount paid in respect of mandatory profit-sharing was €64,616,872 (€68,139,126 in 2008). The numbertotal amount of temporary employees during 2006 (in full time equivalent) was 12,506, which represents 4.6%optional and mandatory profit-sharing represented €133,427,695, or 4.4% of the total full-time equivalentcost of employees.employment (€130,500,877 in 2008).

Labor relations and overview of collective bargaining agreements

In 2009, 2,047 collective bargaining agreements were signed, including 1,023 agreements on compensation, 268 agreements on health, safety or working conditions, 317 agreements on labor-management dialog and 439 agreements on other subjects or that regrouped several subjects. The total number of employee representatives was 15,553. In France, the786 collective bargaining agreements were signed, including 431 agreements on compensation, 91 agreements on health, safety or working conditions, 88 agreements on labor-management dialog and 176 agreements on other subjects or that regrouped other subjects. The total number of temporary employees during 2006 (in full time equivalent)employee representatives in France was 7,549, which represents 7.1% of the total full-time equivalent of employees.9,372.

Human Resources Policies

At the end of 2006, we2009, Veolia Environnement had 298,498312,590 employees, 7% less than in 672008. This is a result of the disposal of certain assets (in particular Veolia Propreté Nettoyage et Multiservices), the loss of certain contracts and the impact of the economic crisis on some industrial sector contracts.

The nature of the Group’s activity fully justifies the attention paid to all its employees, who are located throughout the 74 countries around the world.  The diversity of its geographic presence, business and technical know how constitute a truly substantial contributionwhere Veolia is present. Firstly, this service-based activity, which is provided to the development of environmental services.public, local and regional government, requires a know-how that is extensively drawn from Veolia men and women. Secondly, their skills cannot be delocalized, as they need to be in proximity to the territories and populations they serve.

Ongoing research relating to improvements in customer serviceFor these reasons, systematically taking into account local context, cultural specificities and the tailoring of these services to the growing need for environmental preservation and improvement of urban living standards requires individual and collective expertise within our entities.

Human resources managementexisting teams is at the centerheart of the constant tension between our economicCompany’s preoccupations and corporate diversity and the construction of a common identitystrategy. The human resources policy is therefore based on shared skills.  Constructing this identity entails implementing certain fundamental principles in each entity according to specific elements of its businessthe conviction that valorizing talents and its national context.

The first of these principlesskills is the development of employees’ loyalty to their employer.  Regardless of their level of qualificationa prerequisite for motivating employees and the responsibilities assigned to them, our employees must prove themselves capable of taking initiatives, displaying a sense of responsibility towards customers and acting creatively.  This can only be achieved through a long-term commitment to their employer.  This also assumes that all employees receive solid training upon entering the company, not only in order to master missions assigned to them, but also so that they may continue to evolve throughout their career within the company.  This assumes, finally, that sufficient possibilities for professional mobility are offered within our company.

Guaranteeing the safety and well-being of employees where business exposes them to specific professional risks constitutes a second fundamental principle. Beyond respecting applicable regulations, our company’s management must regularly attend to the improvement of work conditions and maintain an unfailing commitment to risk prevention among all employees.

Finally, every employee must feel personally implicated in his company’s endeavors and, on a larger scale, those of Veolia Environnement. This entails, particularly, the development of incentives and profit-sharing and, more generally, of an employee shareholder base.

Through an ongoing dialogueimproving performances, at all levels we have continuedof the business, at all stages of corporate life and for each of its local contexts. In the current economic climate, the Group’s social model must, more than ever, reinforce its founding values of employability, skills development, occupational safety, social awareness and guaranteed decent living conditions.

Ensuring that new employees are integrated and retained is therefore a key strategic aspect of the Group’s human resources policy. As an extension of the principles that were adopted several years ago, Veolia Environnement is continuing its efforts to offer all new employees sound training that is specific to each occupation, which makes it possible for them to become professionals in their field of business and to create opportunities for themselves to progress throughout their career. This training is also intended to develop their sense of service and to enhance the contribution they make, significant progress in these different areas in 2006, thus contributingat their level, to the reinforcementprovision of our employees’ motivationessential needs, the preservation of the environment and the well-being of the public.

One of the means of developing this sense of belonging withinservice is through work-study programs. This type of training has become a standard method of recruitment in the company.various Group entities. In France, the “Veolia Skills” program, which started in 2005, illustrates the Group’s commitment to put this approach into practice through apprenticeship or work-and-training contracts.

Developing career paths and mobility, encouraging labor-management dialog at all levels and using social engineering know-how are all positive measures that convey the Group’s values in all the countries where it does business. Safety remains a major concern and the Group is tirelessly pursuing its efforts in this area, while also helping its employees to stay in good health. Moreover, increasing diversity and promoting equal opportunities are key issues for maintaining growth and upholding Veolia Environnement’s commitment to cohesion and teamwork. Finally, employee well-being is addressed through suitable living conditions and an equitable compensation policy that rewards employees’ individual efforts and takes into account the Company’s performance.

Preparing the future through an understanding of

153



Back to Contents


Understanding our corporate reality

The consistent management of human resources within each division of our group requires a constant appraisalOnly sound knowledge of corporate reality and operational practices. We depend onpractices makes it possible to deploy and manage human resources consistently. The Group uses a worldwide network of nearly 500more than 700 correspondents in the divisions towho collect, process and consolidate 150around 200 social indicators.

Specialized A dedicated software package is used to ensure that collectionthis process is reliable and confirmation ofto validate the data, which is reliable.  Data collection is followedthen analyzed by analysisgeographical zone, by geographic location, country and by type of activity.

The objective, accurate evaluation of the human resources performance of each entity over time is guaranteed by the stability of retained indicators facilitates a better usethe chosen indicators. In this regard, once again this year Veolia Environnement is ranked as the leading CAC 40 company in terms of the thoroughness and guarantees and favors an objective and precise evaluationquality of corporate progress in each of our entities. Our group monitors ten indicators with particularly close attention.  These relateits human resources data1.

Specific attention is paid to data concerning staff turnovers, limited-term contracts, overtime, absenteeism and workplace accidents.  five parameters:

These progress indicators have served to give color to certain areas of social policy set forth by our management by asking that various entities focus their measuring instruments and guiding efforts on:

·

Employeeemployee loyalty;

·

Reduction ofreducing absenteeism;

·

Priority assigned to safety inof working conditions;

·

Diminutionreducing temporary labor (fixed-term contracts and temporary workers);

the development of temporary employment; and

·

Development of professionalvocational training and skills particularly through part-time programs.of skills.


These are the key tenets of the human resources policy that is driven by Veolia Environnement general management, to which it has asked Veolia entities to devote their efforts in terms of steering.




Back to contents



InAnalysis and internal surveys are also conducted in order to refine progress indicators and management inimprove the steering of the human resources policy in the coming years analysis and internal examinations have been initiated to:to come:

·

Trackidentify recurring trends through analyzing changes in the evolution of indicators over the last three years and thus observe recurring themes,years;

·

Comparecompare data from Veolia Environnement and its subsidiaries with information available in public statistics related tofrom the corresponding professional branches (in France, as an initial phase),business sectors (initially in France);

·

Observe revenuesanalyze the results by profession and country,by country;

·

Collect and highlight the specificities of each division andactivity or the particularspecific contexts of certain countries, andcountries;

·

Define areas wheredefine paths for progress is needed in the coming years, specifyingby adapting, where applicable, the objectives by profession and by country, as the need arises.country.


ConsciousThis method of evaluation and performance steering is based on a common framework of performance objectives, which is personalized in light of the need to anticipate the evolutionspecificities of local occupations and long-term prospectus of skillscontexts (e.g. practices, legislation, regulations and professions, we are enhancing our system of classificationsocial protection, etc.). The analyses and management of human resources through a detailed mapping of jobs and skill sets across our various divisions, and through a unified classification of its managers.  In France and abroad, our group is attentive to the corporate environment in which we are evolving and attempts to anticipate our transformations.  To this end, the corporate observatory, created in 2001, conducts prospective analysis and studies in partnership with research organizationssurveys will be continued in order to elaboraterefine the construction of a long-term social vision.  Demographic pressure, transformations in the labor market, reorientation of public policy in terms of recruitment and training, change in behavior regarding mobility and career choices are among the areas that we must take into accou nt to anticipate and construct its model for a worldwide corporate environment.method over time.

In 2006, the corporate observatory’s work focused on:

·1

The CEREQ study (Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches sur les Qualifications)Alpha Study issued on November 26, 2009 on the appropriation of the skill management agreement, whose results were presents2008 reports.



154



Back to all involved parties, including committee for the France group,Contents

·

A study on the professionalization of management training in environmental service divisions,

·

A study on the chargé d’affaire position as a commercial office in industrial and tertiary sectors,

·

A study on absenteeism conducted in collaboration with the ANACT (National Agency for the Improvement of Work Conditions - Agence Nationale pour l’Amélioration des Conditions de Travail).

In addition, the following work was carried out in 2006:

·

A follow-up on the survey conducted by the CECOP (Centre d’Etude et de Connaissance sur l’Opinion Publique) among employees recruited in 2006 in association with operation Veolia Skills,

·

The evaluation of the Cycle dirigeants, an annual training program directed towards a panel of French and international directors within the Group.

·

Enhance skills, maintain strong ambition for professionalization


Implementation of an agreement relating to skills development and professional advancement

In 2006, in France, our entities joined together to locally implement an agreement relating toEncouraging employee loyalty through the development of skills and professional progress

Veolia Environnement strives to attract and train the best employees in all the socio-professional categories of its professions and in all countries where the Group is present.

Veolia Environnement reaffirms its societal commitment to facilitate access to jobs for young people and the unemployed, by emphasizing its investment in the work-study system, which prepares its employees for employability by combining theoretical training signed on October 4, 2004 withand practical experience. For Veolia Environnement, work-study programs are not only a training policy, but also a recruitment policy, since they facilitate access to employment and the unions.hiring process stages for the Company.

This agreementVeolia Environnement’s exemplary action in the field of work-study programs has been implemented accordingrecognized through the “Work-Study Mission” entrusted to various outlinesHenri Proglio by the French President, in the context of the current economic climate and the state of employment among young people. This action has led to both major corporations being mobilized around the promotion and development of work-study contracts, as well as to the publication of a report delivered to the government in December 2009, which take into accountproposes a set of measures to encourage companies to use work-study programs.

In the prioritiessame way, at the request of the Secretary of State for Employment, the Veolia Environnement director of training authored a study on mentoring.

Regardless of their origin and specific factors associated withlength of service, this also means giving each division.employee the possibility of developing their skills throughout his or her career. Annual assessment interviews define the requirements that are necessary for each employee to develop skills and improve career development prospects. These are complemented by executive reviews and the design of succession plans for the key positions in each entity.

In order to strengthen management culture, particular attention is paid to the management of senior managers, in particular their leadership potential and their ability to propagate Veolia Environnement’s social responsibility values. It is therefore essential for the Group to identify talented managers and to anticipate natural turnover, by strengthening the talent pipelines in a constant, balanced way so as to reflect the Group’s international deployment and diversity.

Continuance of the “Veolia Skills” approach

Veolia Eau focused more specifically onSkills is a central agreement stressing professionalrecruitment approach that was launched in France in 2005 in order to anticipate business growth and changing qualifications. The program is open to internal and external candidates, of all ages and qualifications.

External candidates benefit from apprenticeship or training contracts in order to receive work-study training over nine to twenty-four months. If the improvement oftraining is completed successfully, the most precarious employees’ level of qualification, while Veolia Énergie concentrated its efforts on the establishment of tutoring programs, following an agreement with social partners.  In the environmental services division, about 20 decentralized agreements were signed relating to professional development, the annual evaluation process, tutoring, apprenticeships and work safety programs.

At Veolia Transport, individual working groups have been formed for the analysis of population pyramids and personnel turnover.

“Veolia Skills” Program

Since 2005, we have been engaged in a large and innovative recruiting campaign in France called “Veolia Skills”. The campaign’s objective is to train future employees of our group, regardless of their age and initial training.  Outside candidates are awarded a diploma (ranging from a CAP (vocational skills certificate) to a Master’s degree), which increases the chances of being offered professional skills training contracts, followed byan indefinite-term employment once they have obtained a diploma.  In terms of professional mobility, the operationcontract.

The approach is also assistsopen to internal candidates, who are offered skill developmentSkills Development Contracts or work-study periods in order to progress within the Group. These types of mobility show how the framework agreement is being implemented to develop skills.

As part of the Veolia Skills operation, the regional branches of Veolia Environnement decided to organize “Meetings with Employment and Training Partners” in the fall of 2008. The aim of these meetings was to encourage discussions and to clarify the expectations of all the stakeholders concerned locally by the environmental services sector. More than 750 participants responded favorably to this call. These meetings have given rise to the publication of a progress report entitled “The New Challenges for Environment Sector Professions”. From April to June 2009, Veolia Environnement went out to meet candidates who were pre-selected by employment and training partners (State Job Centers, local initiatives, the AFPA, GRETA and CFA training organizations, Disability Advisory Bureaus, etc.). Candidates were able to have meetings with Group employees who work in areas wh ere there is a strong need for recruitment.

In contributing to the “Work-Study Mission”, Veolia continued to act as a socially responsible employer, by committing to hire 3,000 young people in 2009/2010 through various work-study contracts: apprenticeship contracts, work-and-training contracts or contractsresearch agreements.



155



Back to Contents


Career paths diversified by mobility

In order to enrich its employees’ professional paths throughout their careers, for professionalization periodsa number of years Veolia Environnement has invested in internal mobility for evaluation within our group.  Withits staff categories. In 2009, over fifteen thousand employees benefited from mobility.

The Veolia Environnement recruitment and mobility website has been overhauled and extended. This new space, which is available online, is aimed as much at external candidates for positions or internships, as at Group employees who wish to change business sector or function. This portal is currently being deployed internationally: in the supportUnited States, the United Kingdom and Germany.

International development is not possible without executive mobility. Executives are corporate experts or managers who contribute to the start-up and development of external partners, such asnew operations throughout the ANPE,world, while facilitating the AFPA, French National Educationpooling and its continued training network (GRETA), Veolia Skills aimstransfer of know-how. The objective is to recruit 8,000encourage all talented employees and to accompany them wherever they work. Expatriates therefore come from an increasing variety of countries and represent forty-six nationalities.

In the past ten years, this population has almost doubled and at the end of 2009, 893 employees (of which 74% are French) were on assignment in 2007, after having attained its objectivemore than seventy countries. Employee mobility involves for the most part the Group’s development zones: Asia, Africa and the Middle East, in particular China, Saudi Arabia and the UAE.

Efforts are also continuing to promote VIE (International Corporate Volunteer) contracts. These young graduates (164 in 2009, of 4,879 hirings in 2006.  This trend is in line with our policywhich one-third are women) represent a potential reservoir of equal opportuni tytalent for international mobility and respect of diversity.for the Company.

A strong ambition: trainingTraining and professionalizationwork experience

In order to maintain ourits position as a world leader in environmental servicesits sector (environmental services) and continually reinforce the quality and technical excellence of its services, we dependVeolia Environnement relies on its chief asset: competent personnel.prime resource: skilled employees. To develop employee skills in the constantly evolving contextchanging environment of our various divisions,its business sectors, the groupGroup has entrusted Campus Veolia Environnement Campus with the orchestrationorganization of itsan ambitious training policy whichthat is builtbased on several structuralthe following guiding principles:




Back to contents



·

Professionalize our group’sensure that Group employees are as professional as possible in their divisionprofession and work contextworking environment, by giving valueemphasizing the experience they have acquired to their accrued expertise with clients,clients;

·

Organizeorganize the transmissiontransfer of know-how within subsidiaries,companies;

·

Supportsupport the policypolicies of professional mobility and career development, anddevelopment;

·

Reinforcestrengthen the corporate culture surroundingthat surrounds the environmental services divisionprofession by emphasizingpromoting potential synergies (high added valuevalue-added for our company’sGroup clients) and solidarity.team work.

Campus Veolia Environnement: a benchmark for training

Campus Veolia Environnement Campus:is the expression of Veolia’s desire to be a pivotalreference in the field of vocational training. The Campus is responsible for implementing and organizing the training site

Aspolicy, and re-groups in a communal platform forsingle location the various Group training divisions and trains employees and apprentices in skills development for allthat are specific to its four business segments. Campus Veolia Environnement divisions (water, energy, environmental servicescan simultaneously host hundreds of apprentices, and transportation), Veolia Environnementaward seventeen diplomas, from the CAP (vocational skills certificate) to a Master’s degree, via its Apprentice Training Center (CFA). The Campus brings togetheris a genuine benchmark in the field of ongoing, vocational training heads of all of our group’s subsidiaries and constitutes a forum for cultural diversityits platforms and interaction.simulators reproduce employee tools, processes and working conditions.

As a technological showcase of our activities, Veolia Environnement Campus also constitutes a pivotal training facility at the forefront of aIn response to worldwide network.

Taking into account our current development and perspectives open to its business around the world,growth that involves human, commercial human and financial issues, call for intelligent managementmaking sure that the know-how of ourthe Group’s employees is aligned with changes in its business segments and the diversity of local contexts has become a necessity. This is why the training efforts and optimization of our group’s resources.  To this end, the purposes, implementation principles and areas of development within our group’s training policy must be supported within each country and division, while respecting local contexts.

Valuable initial and continued training

Theoffered by Campus Veolia Environnement is being constantly adapted.



156



Back to Contents


Tasks and governing principles

Training is open to all employees, throughout their careers. Campus which providesVeolia Environnement offers initial training for allthrough work-study programs, as well as ongoing training. The Campus makes it possible to obtain a recognized diploma or qualification. Its training courses are taught using real-life situations to encourage understanding of the profession, the demand for quality service and employee autonomy.

With around 450 Group professionals, internal skills necessary forare mobilized, which encourages teaching through a combination of work and study. The concept of joint investment by the provision of environmental services, constructs its programs to respond to continuing education needs, an essential skill development tool for employees that also allows them to ensure their future employability.  18,000 participants were admitted toemployee and the campus in 2006.

The campus’s program also responds to initial training needs.  This part of the program allows for the integration of young people who then earn a professional degree through apprenticeship and work study (from the Cap to Bac+5).  Thiscompany is the case at the CFA Institute of Urban Environment, where close to 15 degrees are earned with a success rate of 94%.  These high-level degrees correspond to the Europeanlicence, master and doctorate.particularly emphasized.

An international network and reliable partnersbuilt on a tested model

To better implement its ambitious training policy, theCampus Veolia Environnement Campus also depends on reliablecoordinates the international training network, which is structured over the five continents. This network already federates eighteen campuses in eleven countries. This network makes it possible to implement and high quality partners.  Boasting fouradapt training centers associatedprograms and take appropriate action that is aligned with fourthe specificities of the region, countries and divisions and nine other training centers around the world, weconcerned. To ensure the Group’s growth onconsistency and homogeneity of this deployment, local trainers benefit from the international level.guidance of Campus Veolia Environnement quality training standards. Moreover, efficient relations are maintained with universities, top graduate schools and research centers.

To this end, about 30 academic partnershipsAs a complement to the original Jouy-le-Moutier site and as part of a logical move to bring employees closer together while maintaining a strong regional presence, five regional Campuses (North West in Lille, Central Eastern in Lyon, South East Marseille, West in Nantes and South West in Tarbes) have been established between these training centersopen since 2008.

In the same way, the network of Campuses benefits from international branches: eleven Campuses support Veolia Environnement international development by proposing adapted programs in Germany, Australia, China, Egypt, the United States, Gabon, Israel, Morocco, the Czech Republic, the United Kingdom and universities, prestigious higher education establishments and research centers in France and abroad.Sweden.

Ensuring the safety and health of employees

OurPrevention, and the health and safety of our employees, often workare a continual concern given the very nature of our activities:

working on public roads;

being faced with antisocial behavior in public areas and privatevehicles;

working conditions on certain sites under conditionsor the facilities of some corporate clients;

tasks that involve risks to their safety. In addition, their work sometimes involvesrequire a certain levelamount of physical stress that may resultlabor.

Each Veolia Environnement Division and each subsidiary monitor accidentology indicators, in health problems.particular the frequency and severity of accidents in the operational management of their business activities.

In the face of these risks, each division has prepared various voluntary policies for risk prevention, while integrating the monitoring of accident indicators (frequency and seriousness) into their operational management. In addition to the continuous improvement ofconstant work to improve safety materialmaterials and individual protective gear,equipment, several priority safety measures have been systematically implemented within all subsidiaries, aimed at:implemented:

·

29% of each employee’s training is devoted to health and safety, in order to prevent occupational accidents;

preventing risks well upstream involves identifying and evaluating these risks; for example, particular attention is paid to the risks so linked to the use of chemicals, for example, within the context of the European REACH Regulation;

as part of labor-management dialog, the 3,360 structures that are dedicated to health and safety contribute to raising awareness of these matters;

supporting employees who have suffered occupational accidents, both during their absence and when they return to work.

Using indicators, the Veolia Environnement Executive Committee regularly analyzes the prevention of occupational risks, health and safety as the logical extension of an approach to continually improve operational and management practices.



157



Back to Contents


The progress plan implemented in the Group since 2008 has made it possible to support various priority actions in the field throughout the world by focusing on:

annual Prevention, Health and Safety road maps for managers (quantitative data, current situation review, performance targets and plans for future actions);

Group management standards for Prevention, Health and Safety, which define the indispensable basis of Group requirements for occupational health and safety, and allow the operational entities to perform self-evaluations and be audited;

monitoring accidents via an information system that is being deployed to record and consolidate information on accidents (Acciline software) in order to obtain improved analysis of the causes and better evaluate the risks;

the development of employee skills on safety issues (workplace tutoring and safety orientation, use of a common core health and safety syllabus for training programs, and management of prevention, health and safety matters).

The involvement of the executive management and all the Group Committee unions in France has made it possible, through the Monitoring Commission for the framework agreement signed in December 2008 on prevention, health and safety, to make an initial assessment of the priority areas for progress that result from this agreement, in particular:

liaison and collective prevention initiatives in the area of occupational health and safety by associating the structures that are concerned with these matters by law, such as the Committee on Health, Safety and Working Conditions;

identification of occupational risks, more accurate measurement of these risks and, consequently, better management of them in order to reinforce their prevention;

the inclusion of occupational health and safety in the career path of all employees, in particular through training programs and professional meetings;

the development of access to healthcare and increasing responsibility among all staff with regard to their health and their safety;

the promotion of career paths that prevent future unemployability, in order to make health part of skills management;

seek improved health-safety balance between professional and private lives.

Veolia Environnement has improved the coordination and organization of the networks that are designed to prevent them,health and thus contributingsafety risks at international level. This method of organization ensures not only better deployment of the actions undertaken, but also makes it possible to an effort that has been ongoing since 2002.  For example,define the Group policies on the basis of the risks identified in each operational unit. It also makes it possible to highlight the best practices of all Veolia Énergie is taking actionssectors throughout the world and to controlcapitalize on them.

Preparation of the Group to deal with the influenza pandemic risk

As early as 2005 the Group took action to prepare for the risk of legionellaan influenza pandemic, in order to set up the organization and eliminating asbestosthe resources to fulfill two major objectives: ensure the protection of its employees and ensure the continuity of its business activities, which are vital to the existence of local and regional government.

Following the WHO alerts concerning the A/H1N1 influenza virus pandemic, the Group activated the chosen procedures, taking into account the rise in its installations;the number of cases in each country (Mexico and the United States were the first countries affected) and maintaining close liaison with the local health authorities in order to ensure the continuity of services, eliminate contamination and limit the potential impacts on employee health.

·

158



Back to Contents


A policy of increased security throughout the world

International current affairs continually confirm the unstable, shifting nature of the environment in which Group employees are sometimes required to work in certain countries, where they may be confronted with political crises, terrorist risks and natural disasters.

In 2009 the security department monitored 1,700 missions, an increase of 25% compared to 2008. The security department has a database, analyzes the local security conditions for missions, anticipates risks by producing a monthly map of at-risk countries, and organizes training and informingto remind employees how to behave during missions in at-risk countries (35% employees on howshort-term missions have been trained to recognizedate).

Risk prevention is paramount, both from a legal and prevent workplace accidents and understandhuman standpoint. The security department has set up responsive, coordinated internal networks at the risks for example,Division’s head offices as well as in the international dayfield (fourteen “security officers” have been appointed throughout the world). In the event of safety prevention and awareness actions at Veolia Propreté.  A quarter of training provided is dedicated to safety and health matters;

·

strengthening the safety network and developing a social dialogue dedicated to the study of health and safety issues within 2,634 instances, which are dedicated to these subjects;

·

supporting injured persons, both during their convalescence and the time that they resume work;

·

implementing, on a case by case basis, a management systeman emergency, partnerships have been formed with global specialists for health and safety at work, based on the international reference OHSAS 18001;

·

ensuring the safety of employees traveling for business in high-risk areas through the implementation of a safety crisis team.


Employee health and the health of the population at large are a concern in every part of the world, but we must be even more vigilant in countries where the population suffers from a serious epidemic. As a result, we have initiated the following actions: Veolia Environnement, which joined the “World Coalition of Corporations against AIDS,” has organized an important AIDS prevention and treatment campaign in Gabon, in cooperation with the Pasteur Institute.  In Tangiers, Veolia Eau has pursued a program focusing on the improvement of water and water-treatment infrastructure and the raising of awareness regarding hygiene and environmental issues.  Finally, in order to confront a potential flu pandemic due to the H5N1 virus, we have created a special organization and developed action plans to help protect employees and maintain essential services for the public.




Back to contents



security evacuations.

ConstructBuild and maintain a relationship of confidence with employees

A social dialogue initiated upon arrival and integration of personnelLabor-management dialog that starts when employees join

In France and abroad, we pursue our externalthroughout the world, Veolia Environnement is continuing its acquisition-based growththrough several types of transactions,transaction, including mergers and acquisitions, the creation of communaljoint subsidiaries with other industrial partners, and public service delegationPPP contracts signed with local governments.

and regional government authorities. In all cases, personnel remainthe employees, who are the players in service professions, are one of the key factors of success.success factors.

The main challenge is enablingto transfer and integrate the existing personnel into an approach that aims to growachieve progress at every stage.level of the business and at all stages of employment. This is true of status,concerns the employee position characteristics, as well as training, the capitalization of know-how, transmissionthe transfer of skills, as much as compensation and social benefits and entails constructingemployee benefits. This amounts to building a new corporate missionproject based on ourVeolia Environnement’s values, while continuing to considertaking into account the one in place.existing project.

OurVeolia Environnement’s human resources policy in such cases restsfor these types of business combination is based on the conviction that the identification and underliningvalorization of talents and skills constitutesis a prerequisite to the motivation of thepre-requisite for motivating managers and the improvement ofimproving performance.

The systematic understanding ofSystematically taking into account the local context, mentalitymentalities and teams in place is at the centerheart of our preoccupations and strategy; our group’s expertise inthe Company’s strategy. The Company’s social engineering expertise and the management of human resources in this area, are the principalsuccess factors required for successful of all these growth and integration transactions.operations.

Strengthening social dialogue at all levelsGroup committees to structure and strengthen labor-management dialog

For ourthe Group’s local services, which formare fundamental part of ourto Veolia Environnement’s business, employee dialogue takes places within operatinglabor-management dialog is initiated in business units atthat are as close to the ground level.employees and the working environment as possible. It is atwithin this levelframework that social partnerslabor and management representatives are best able to provide appropriate solutions forin the areas of organization and workworking conditions, developing skills development and rewarding each employee’s individual efforts.

Our group’s human resources policy must also be adapted to The Veolia Environnement labor-management dialog venue has three levels:

the other countries where our group hasfirst level, that of the business, remains the natural negotiating venue;

the second level, that of the country, regroups joint commissions for information and dialog that cover all the national themes;

the third level, on a presence. After the establishment of a group committeeEuropean scale, informs and consults employees throughout Europe.

Two Group Committees were set up: one in France in 2003, anthen one at European level in 2005. These Committees met regularly in 2009, with each holding a plenary session and meetings at the level of their respective offices.

Within the scope of this active dialog, commissions have been monitoring the “Prevention of Occupational Risks, Health and Safety at Work” agreement, which was signed by all the French labor union organizations in December 2008.



159



Back to Contents


A new agreement was signed by the general management and all the labor union organizations (CGT, CFDT, CGT-FO, CFE-CGC, CFTC; UNSA) on February 9, 2010. This Group-level agreement covers the quality and development of labor-management dialog in October 2005France, in particular with regard to:

recognition of the importance of labor-management dialog as a priority means of ensuring the Group runs smoothly and enjoys economic development;

the implementation of Group union coordinators with regard to create a Europeanthe new provisions of labor law;

the adaptation of the resources allocated to Group Committee uniting personnel representatives from 21 European countries.  union coordinators and their organizations within the scope of the new provisions of the law on union representativeness;

the definition of the process that ensures elected employees’ careers and remuneration are actively managed and evolve, in particular via the recognition of union careers through the Validation of Professional Experience (VAE);

the rules governing access to and use by union organizations of new information and communication technologies.

The resulting dedicated space for projected management of jobs and skills was also the subject of in-depth discussions with labor and management representatives concerning:

the implementation of a global process that aims to steer employment at Group level, while strengthening labor-management Dialog;

the processes that aim to facilitate the professional mobility of employees and skills development;

the implementation of joint business segment observatories at the level of each of the business segments, complemented by a coordination committee at the Group level.

Lastly, as an extension of Veolia Environnement labor-management dialog, during the France and Europe Group committee meetings in the second half of 2009, there was in-depth communication by executive management on the issues associated with the Transdev Group combination.

Promote diversity and fight against discriminations

From the outset, the Company adopted diversity as a core value:

cultural diversity, which is linked to the many different origins of its employees, with over a hundred nationalities represented;

economic diversity, which is associated with having several business segments;

social dialogue operatesdiversity, which is a result of being located in many different countries.

These three dimensions are a source of riches that requires careful attention, as well as coordinated reflection on three levels:the guiding principles of the Veolia Environnement diversity policy.

In 2007, an extensive program of internal work was undertaken with two aims:

produce a diagnostic review of behavior and practices in the Group and its subsidiaries;

generate a base of common values that preserve the Group’s identity and respect the diversity of its environments.



160



Back to Contents


·This approach was put into practice through the launch of a “2008-2011 Diversity and Equal Opportunities Plan” that emphasizes three essential levers:

The subsidiary level will remain

equal treatment, to guarantee non-discriminatory access to jobs, career progress and skills development;

harmonious management of diversity on a day-to-day basis, which means respecting differences, fighting against prejudices, and raising the location where traditional negotiations occur,awareness of Group internal stakeholders through training programs;

·

The country level will allow for exchange of information and dialogue on all national themes,

·

The third level will be occupiedminimum labor standards, which guarantee growth that is socially responsible. These Group minimum labor standards, which go beyond the fundamental rights defined by the European Group Committee.ILO and the OECD, need to be detailed and adapted throughout the world, in order to guarantee genuinely equal opportunities for all.

In order to promote non-discriminatory access to employment, Veolia Environnement is continuing its policy of recruitment through work-study programs. This policy aims to improve labor market access and employability for persons for whom access to jobs is difficult: young people without qualifications and the unemployed. The latterpolicy is a forum for consultation and information on subjects that involve all employees. The European Group Committee, which met for the first time in September 2006 laid the foundations for a transnational visiontherefore oriented towards sectors of the Group’s social diversitypublic that are deemed to be a priority: women (access to “male” professions and initiated a social dialogue enhanced by its experience in Europe.

Upgrade social innovation

We seekkey positions), seniors (job maintenance), and employees of various ethnic origins. Access to enhance its social initiatives, both individualoperational management positions for women and collective, local and global.  Since 2003,increasing the company has been realizing this objective enacting procedures for identification, collection and publication for all social and community related endeavors.  Close to 1,000 initiatives were recorded in four years originating in all regionsinternational nature of senior executives are some of the world where we conducted our business, proving ou group’s consistencyways forward that have been identified. With regard to careers for union representatives, the Group must be able to offer guarantees so that each elected representative can return to his/her profession and acqui re new skills at the contributionsend of individuals.his/her term of office.

Furthermore, corporate innovations fall under diverse categories, underlining different local preoccupations.Veolia Environnement also ensures that it helps seniors to stay in their jobs and encourages the recruitment of persons who suffer from handicaps or disabilities. The Divisions have Disability Assistance Offices that lead initiatives in terms of raising awareness, assistance with hiring disabled employees or the use of sheltered workshops.

Beyond identifying all social initiatives stemming from each of our subsidiaries,In France, an Active Solidarity Plan was launched in consultation with the primaryFrance Group committee, in order to support the more disadvantaged employees in a difficult economic context.

Within this framework, a center for advising and supporting employees outside the Company was set up: “Allô Solidarité”. Its objective is to upgrade the most pertinent innovations, in terms of both their transferabilityresolve urgent situations and coherence with the company’s values.  Therefore, about 40 innovations are made into corporate initiatives, published in French and English and featured on the internet and intranet sites.to provide security for individuals who very often do not know who to contact.

In addition,an initial pilot phase, the operation concerns the Ile-de-France Region, where 30,000 employees are based. In order to ensure all employees were informed of this initiative as soon as the system was set up, a panel composed of company representatives and outside participants meets annually to designate the most innovative projects and award themcard with a trophy, deliveredtoll free number and some explanations was attached to their pay slip.

In nine months, around 500 calls were received, primarily concerning housing and/or financial problems.

Lastly, in order to increase the visibility of its pro-diversity undertakings and actions, Veolia Environnement has applied for the diversity accreditation created by the CEO.  In 2006, the following subsidiaries wereFrench government and awarded trophies:by Afnor Certification in order to recognize corporate best practices.

·

United Water (Australia) for its partnership with the association Phoenix Society in favor of recruiting handicapped people;

·A consistent, competitive compensation policy

Veolia Transport France, for its measures in support of part-time drivers in partnership with Veolia Eau and Veolia Propreté;

·

Otus Gennevilliers (Veolia Propreté) which has established basic French language courses for employees experiencing difficulty in oral and written expression;

·

Siram (subsidiary of Veolia Énergie in Italy), which has instituted a safety trophy to diminish the rate of accidents in the work place;

·

Citeluz (Brazil), which has donated material retired from service to disadvantaged artists who transform them into works of art;

·

Veolia Propreté Morocco, Amanor and Hydrolia in Morocco for the signature of agreements with banks permitting employees to have access to bank services; and

The American subsidiaries, Veolia Transport, Veolia Propreté and Veolia Eau for their humanitarian intervention in close cooperation with one another following hurricanes Katrina and Rita.




Back to contents



A compensation policy that associates social welfare benefits and employee profit-sharing

We applyEnvironnement applies a global compensation policy, which is consistent with the company’sCompany’s results and includes the following components: salary,salaries, social welfare benefitssecurity and employee savings. This approach consists of:

·

awarding competitive compensationpolicy is based on the markets of the relevant countries;following principles:

·

enabling employees to earn fairguarantee competitive compensation that is in line with local market practices;

offer equitable compensation, which takes into account their own personaland rewards individual efforts;

·

strengtheningincrease social welfare benefits (illness, provisions)security (health, disability and life insurance);

·

reinforcingminimize the pension and entitlementrisk associated with the existing systems for paying entitlements or pensions in the various countries;countries where we do business;

·

developingopen access to employee savings.



161



Back to Contents


The increase in life-expectancylife expectancy, the rise in healthcare costs and medical costs, as well as the retirement of the “baby boom” generation will affecthave a lasting effect on the balance of social welfare benefit systems in the long-term.Insecurity systems. In certain countries, following the abandonment of public social security systems, economic actors muststakeholders have a duty to provide medical, provisional,health, benefit and retirement coveragepension cover for their employees where the social welfare benefit system does not.employees.

In lightAs a result of its international presence, our companydimension, the Company must take these factors into account and be sure to:ensure that it:

·

respectcomplies with local legislative systemslegislation and establishimplements complementary social welfaresecurity systems so asin order to guarantee high quality coverage tofor all ourits employees;

·

guaranteeguarantees the competitiveness of the companyCompany by attempting to limit corporate engagements falling underlimiting benefit obligations that fall within the accounting standardscope of IAS 19;

·

finance the entitlementfinances benefit systems with contributions from theby employer and employeesemployee contributions, so as to ensure the responsibility of all parties.that each party assumes responsibility.

Our corporate commitments for 2006 were consolidated in a vehicle created in 2004.  They were estimated at €2.02At December 31, 2009, Veolia Environnement’s benefit obligations represented €1.96 billion, an increase of 29% essentiallyaround 15% compared to the end of 2008, which is primarily due to changes in actuarial assumptions, and also linked to acquisitionscurrency exchange effects. These obligations are mainly comprised of companies. Definedpension schemes with defined benefits (65%) and career-end indemnities (24%). The other obligations are mainly constituted 70% of this amount.  Other commitments related to end-of-contract indemnity, senior executive retirement, medical coverage for retirees, length of service reward payments and other work benefits.  contract termination indemnities. These Group obligations exist in around 50 countries.

Share subscription and purchase options

Options awarded to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and exercised by them in 2009

Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer were not awarded any share subscription or purchase options in 2009 and neither of them exercised any options or received bonus shares during the year 2009.

Share subscription or purchase options granted to the top ten employees who are not corporate officers (mandataires sociaux) during 2009 and options exercised during 2009

The consolidation of commitments was affected in more than 60 countriestable below sets forth the share subscription or purchase options granted to the top ten employees who are not corporate officers (mandataires sociaux) during 2009 and accounts for current hypothesis close in 2006 to those used in 2005. The growth in commitments between 2005 and 2006 remained under control.options exercised during 2009:

Share subscription or purchase options granted to the top ten employees who are not corporate officers and exercised by them

Total number of options awarded / shares subscribed for or purchased

Average weighted price**

Plan number

Options awarded during the 2009 fiscal year by Veolia Environnement and any company within the option award perimeter, to the ten employees of Veolia Environnement and of any other company included within this perimeter, who were awarded the highest number of shares in this way

none

NA

NA

Options held on Veolia Environnement and the companies referred to above, which were exercised during the 2009 fiscal year, by the ten employees of Veolia Environnement and of said companies, for whom the number of options thus exercised is the highest*

4,917

36.65

No. 3

16,648

22.14

No. 4

3,519

24.32

No. 5


*

This does not include options exercised by employees who have left the Group.

**

Exercise price after legal adjustments.



To pursue a policy of employee savings, we conducted a new share capital increase for employees in 2006.  It related to 20 countries and assembled 28,547 employees out of the 162,415 eligible, or about 17.58%.  Today, close to 47,363 employees are shareholders of Veolia and together hold 1.41% of Veolia’s share capital.162



EthicsBack to Contents

Our presence in more than 65 countries around the world necessitates that we implement a set of principles for ensuring compliance with various human rights norms and governance standards set forth under international laws and treaties.

These principles must take into account our cultural diversity and emphasize environmental protection above all, which is one of our foremost concerns. In addition, they must integrate our traditional values, which are based on a close relationship with clients, consumers and civil society and the autonomy of each of our operating divisions.

To this end, we implemented the “Ethics, Commitment and Responsibility” program in February 2003, which was updated in December 2004. This program is intended to guide the daily behavior of our employees. As part of the program, an ethics correspondent has been appointed in each division.

The program reaffirms the fundamental values shared by all of our employees, including, for example, the need for strict observance of the laws in effect in the different countries where we operate, loyalty towards our clients and towards consumers, sustainable development, a sense of solidarity (tolerance, respect of others and social dialogue), management of risks and effective corporate governance.

In March 2004, we created an ethics committee to examine and settle any questions relating to the ethics program. The ethics committee has three members and may pursue any matter that it wishes regarding group ethics. Employees may also freely consult with the committee. The ethics committee must act independently with respect to matters it treats and hold the information relating thereto confidential.

From October 2004 to December 2005, we held fourteen training seminars relating to the “Ethics, Commitment and Responsibility” program, including three outside of France, for over 400 group managers. We intend to continue these actions in 2007 through the implementation of a training program and seminars on compliance with antitrust laws, which will be open internationally to several thousand members of our group.  

Finally, since 2005, we implemented a reporting procedure to help combat fraud, which is overseen by our risk director and the director of control and synergies.





Back to contents



SHARE OWNERSHIP

None of our directors and senior managers owns 1% or more of our shares. Our directors and senior managers as a group own less than one percent1% of our shares. Our directors and senior managersexecutive officers listed below were granted options to subscribe to shares of our company during the last five yearsCompany as follows:

 

Number of Options Initially Awarded(1)

Exercise Price(2)

Expiration Date


2002 Plan

   

Henri Proglio

220,000

37.25(2)36.65

January 28, 2010

Jerôme Contamine(3)

65,000

37.2536.65

January 28, 2010

Antoine Frérot

45,000

37.2536.65

January 28, 2010

Denis Gasquet

45,000

37.2536.65

January 28, 2010


2003 Plan

   

Henri Proglio

220,000

22.5022.14

March 24, 2011

Jerôme Contamine

105,000

22.5022.14

March 24, 2011

Olivier Barbaroux

70,000

22.5022.14

March 24, 2011

Antoine Frérot

70,000

22.5022.14

March 24, 2011

Denis Gasquet

70,000

22.5022.14

March 24, 2011

Stéphane Richard(3)(4)

70,000

22.5022.14

March 24, 2011


2004 Plan

   

Henri Proglio

110,000

24.7224.32

December 24, 2012

Jerôme Contamine

70,000

24.7224.32

December 24, 2012

Eric Marie de Ficquelmont(4)(5)

40,000

24.7224.32

December 24, 2012

Olivier Barbaroux

40,000

24.7224.32

December 24, 2012

Antoine Frérot

40,000

24.7224.32

December 24, 2012

Denis Gasquet

40,000

24.7224.32

December 24, 2012

Stéphane Richard

40,000

24.7224.32

December 24, 2012


2006 Plan

   

Henri Proglio

150,000

44.7544.03

March 28, 2014

Jerôme Contamine

90,000

44.7544.03

March 28, 2014

Eric Marie de Ficquelmont

60,000

44.7544.03

March 28, 2014

Olivier Barbaroux

60,000

44.7544.03

March 28, 2014

Antoine Frérot

60,000

44.7544.03

March 28, 2014

Denis Gasquet

60,000

44.7544.03

March 28, 2014

Stéphane Richard

60,000

44.7544.03

March 28, 2014

    

2007 Plan(6)

Henri Proglio

110,000

€57.05

July 17, 2015

Jerôme Contamine

60,000

€57.05

July 17, 2015

Olivier Barbaroux

40,000

€57.05

July 17, 2015

Antoine Frérot

40,000

€57.05

July 17, 2015

Denis Gasquet

40,000

€57.05

July 17, 2015

Alain Tchernonog

40,000

€57.05

July 17, 2015

(1)

UnderThe numbers of shares which can be acquired upon the exercise of options under each stock option plan one option grantsexcept the right to subscribe to one share of the company.

(2)

The original exercise price, €37.53, has2007 Plan have been adjusted to take into account transactions affecting our share capital (issue(issuance of free warrants for shares in December 2001 and a share capital increaseincreases in August 2002)2002 and July 2007).

(3)(2)

The original exercise prices for all plans except the 2007 Plan have been adjusted to take into account transactions affecting our share capital (issuance of free warrants for shares in December 2001 and share capital increases in August 2002 and July 2007). The original exercise prices under each plan are stated below.

(3)

Mr. Jerôme Contamine is no longer an executive officer of our Company since January 2009.

(4)

Mr. Stéphane Richard is no longer a member of senior managementan executive officer of our companyCompany since May 31, 2007.

(4)(5)

Eric Marie de Ficquelmont is no longer a member of senior managementan executive officer of our companyCompany since January 2007.

(6)

As the performance criteria linked to the growth of the net earnings per share were not reached, the members of the Executive Committee and the senior managers lost 100% of their right under the 2007 Plan, i.e. 1,082,500 options and 29,500 SAR. The other managers lost 50% of their rights, which represent 660,150 options and 42,150 SAR.




163



Back to Contents


Pursuant to the a three-year authorization granted by our general shareholders’ meeting of June 21, 2000, our former management board decided on June 23, 2000 to implement an “outperformance” stock option program. Under the program, we granted 29 of our principal managers options to purchase 780,000 treasury shares at €32.50 per share.  The total number of treasury shares eligible for sale and the exercise price have been adjusted to 784,201 shares and €31.92 per share, respectively, as a result of legal adjustments related to our issue of free warrants for shares in December 2001 and a share capital increase in August 2002, and after subtraction of exercised options. Options granted pursuant to this plan will expire in June 2008. As of December 31, 2006, 284,421 options had been exercised.

Pursuant to the same authorization, our former management board decided on February 8, 2001 to implement a stock option plan pursuant to which 1,500 of our employees (including 6 members of our former management board) received options to subscribe to a total of 3,462,000 newly-issued shares of our company at €42 per share, which was the fair market value of our shares at the time the options were granted.  The total number of newly-issued shares eligible for subscription and the exercise price have been adjusted to 3,526,446 shares and €41.25 per share, respectively, as a result of the legal adjustments described above. Options granted pursuant to this plan will expire in February 2009.  As of December 31, 2006, 817,893 of these options had been exercised.

Finally, pursuant to the same authorization, our former management board decided on January 28, 2002 to implement a stock option plan (plan No. 3) pursuant to which approximately 1,400 of our employees (including 5five members of our former management board) received options to subscribe to a total of 4,413,000 newly-issued shares of our companyCompany at €37.53 per share, which was the average market price over the 20 stock exchange days immediately preceding the date of the meeting of our management board. The total number of newly-issued shares eligible for subscription and the exercise price have been adjusted to 4,418,9594,657,903 shares and €37.25€36.65 per share, respectively, as




Back to contents



a result of the legal adjustments described above and after subtraction of exercised options.options cancelled due to the departure of employees. Options granted pursuant to thist his plan will expire inexpired on January 28, 2010. As of December 31, 2006, 1,232,2992009, 2,351,868 options had been exercised. On the expiration date, a total of 2,385,941 shares had been subscribed for as a result of the exercise of these options. The remaining unexercised options were cancelled.

Pursuant to a newan authorization granted by our general shareholders’ meeting of April 25, 2002, our former management board decided on March 24, 2003 to implement a stock option plan (plan No. 4) pursuant to which approximately 1,740 of our employees (including 6six members of our former management board) received options to subscribe to a total of 5,192,635 newly-issued shares of our companyCompany at €22.50 per share. The total number of newly-issued shares eligible for subscription and the exercise price have been adjusted to 5,164,390 shares and €22.14 per share, respectively, as a result of the legal adjustments described above and after subtraction of options cancelled due to the departure of employees. Options granted pursuant to this plan will expire in March 2011. As of December 31, 2006, 723,7862009, 3,164,028 options had been exercised.

Pursuant to a new authorization granted by our general shareholders’ meeting of May 12, 2004, our boardBoard of directorsDirectors decided on December 24, 2004 to implement a stock option plan (plan No. 5) pursuant to which approximately 1,087 of our employees (including the seven members of our executive committee)Executive Committee in office at the time of award) received options to subscribe to a total of 3,341,600 newly-issued shares of our company correspondingCompany at €24.72 per share. The total number of newly-issued shares eligible for subscription and the exercise price have been adjusted to approximately 0.82% of3,392,012 shares and €24.32 per share, capital on the day the plan was authorized, which represents slightly more than halfrespectively, as a result of the total amount authorized by our general shareholders’ meeting.legal adjustments described above and after subtraction of options cancelled due to the departure of employees. Options granted pursuant to this plan shall be exercisable from December 2007 and will expire in December 2012. As of December 31, 2009, 232,596 options had been exercised.

Pursuant to a new authorization granted by our general shareholders’ meeting of May 12, 2005, our boardBoard of directorsDirectors decided on March 28, 2006 to implement a stock option plan (plan No. 6) pursuant to which approximately 1,378 of our employees (including the 7seven members of our executive committee) will receiveExecutive Committee in office at the time of award) received options to subscribe to a total of 4,044,900 newly-issued shares of our companyCompany at €44.75 per share, which reflected the average opening share prices of our shares in the 20 days preceding the Board of Directors’ decision. Such exercise price does not include any discount, in accordance with the general meeting’s authorization of May 12, 2005. The total number of newly-issued shares eligible for subscription and the exercise price have been adjusted to 4,110,406 shares and €44.03 per share, respectively, as a result of the legal adjustments described abov e and after subtraction of options cancelled due to the departure of employees. Options granted pursuant to this plan will be exercisable from March 2010 and will expire in March 2014. As of December 31, 2009, 1,300 options had been exercised in advance due to the death of a beneficiary, in accordance with French law.

2007 fiscal year

During its meeting of March 29, 2007, following the recommendations of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, the Board of Directors defined our Company’s policy on incentive programs for senior executives and executives of our Group and decided that for certain categories of beneficiaries, this policy could combine the award of stock options and free shares. During its meeting of July 17, 2007, our board of Directors decided that stock options would be reserved for senior executives and that the free shares would be awarded to a large group of executives and “outstanding” employees, without combination of the two policies. In addition, in accordance with new provisions of the French Commercial Code resulting from the law of December 30, 2006 for the development of employee shareholding, our Board of Directors set, as of the same date, the rules applicable to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s obligation to retain all or part of his shares in registered form, which are held as a result of the exercise of options, until the end of the term of his office.

Pursuant to a new authorization granted by our general shareholders’ meeting of May 11, 2006 relating to the issuance of undiscounted share subscription and purchase options representing up to 1% of the share capital, our Board of Directors decided on July 17, 2007 to implement a stock option plan (plan No. 7) pursuant to which 557 of our employees (including seven members of our Executive Committee in office at the time of award) received options to subscribe to a total of 2,490,400 newly-issued shares of our Company, corresponding to approximately 1%0.60% of share capital on the day the plan was authorized. The exercise price of the options has been set at €44.75€57.05 per share, which reflects the average opening share prices of a VE shareour shares in the 20 days preceding the boardour Board of directors’Directors’ decision.  Such exercise price does not include any discount, in accordance with the general meeting’s authorization of May 12, 2005. Options granted pursuant to this plan will be exercisable from March 2010July 2011 and willwil l expire in July 2015.



164



Back to Contents


Pursuant to the board’s decision, 2,490,400 share subscription options were awarded to 557 beneficiaries, including 330,000 options awarded to the members of the Executive Committee and 2,160,400 to the Group’s senior executives and other executives.

2008 fiscal year

The combined ordinary and extraordinary shareholders’ meeting of May 7, 2008 granted our Board of Directors authorization for 26 months, to award our employees and corporate officers (and those of our affiliates), undiscounted share subscription or purchase options, up to 1% of the share capital on the date of the award decision.

The Board of Directors held on March 2014.25, 2008, decided that, in the event of an award in 2008, the definitive vesting of the options would be contingent on minimum growth in our net earnings of 20% over two years (2008-2009). This performance condition would have been applicable to beneficiaries for the sole portion of the options awarded that exceeded the threshold of 10,000.

Finally, the authorization granted by the general shareholders’ meeting of May 7, 2008, which is valid until July 7, 2010, was not used during the 2008 fiscal year.

2009 fiscal year and 2010 general meeting

The authorization to award share subscription or purchase options granted by the general shareholders meeting of May 7, 2008, which is valid until July 7, 2010 was not used during the 2008 and 2009 fiscal years.

As of December 31, 2006,2009, a total of 16,800,258 stock19,482,535 share subscription options had been granted, by us,giving the right to subscribe to 10,926,573 of our shares, after adjustments and ofexercises. Of this total, 9,546,472a total of 6,580,862 options were exercisable (plans n° 2, 3exercisable.

On March 24, 2010, in accordance with the recommendations made by the Appointments and 4).  AsCompensation Committee, the Board of Directors defined the Company policy on incentive schemes for the Group’s managers and executive officers for the 2010 fiscal year. In this regard, the Board of Directors decided to favor the award of stock options.

The Board decided that, should stock options be awarded during the fiscal year, the options would be reserved to the main executives and managers in the Group, except for the chaiman of the Board of Directors and for the Chief Executive Officer. Board of Directors also decided that the vesting of options would be contingent on modalities to be defined, for all beneficiaries, and on attaining return on capital employed (ROCE) of at least 8.4% as of December 31, 2006,2012. The exercise price of the numberoptions would be fixed with reference to the average of the last twenty stock market prices for Veolia Environnement shares (with no discount or premium).

In light of these policy decisions, the board decided to propose that the general meeting of shareholders to be held on May 7, 2010 vote to approve a resolution that authorizes the board to award employees of the Company and of companies that are affiliated to it, for a period of twenty-six months, share subscription or purchase options, with no discount, capped at 1% of the share capital on the date of the award decision.

Our Board of Directors meeting of March 24, 2009 decided to give priority to stock option awards in 2009 and confirmed this decision at its March 24, 2010 meeting.



165



Back to Contents


Employee profit-sharing

Optional and mandatory profit-sharing contracts

Given the nature of our shares before exercisebusiness, we are unable to allocate funds to the mandatory profit-sharing reserve provided for by law, and therefore have not entered into any related profit-sharing contracts. However, an optional profit-sharing plan applies to all our employees, which aims at aligning employees’ interests with the results of the remaining stock options amounted to 410,795,840 shares. On this date, if all stock options (plans n°2 to 6) had been exercised, 16,800,258 new shares would have been issued, representingGroup in terms of achieving specific growth objectives over a dilution percentage in case of exercise of 4 %.

Company Savings Planthree-year period.

In connection with Vivendi Universal’s gradual divestiture of itsgeneral, we favor expanding optional profit-sharing plans in order for employees to have a vested interest in Veolia Environnement, a groupthe progress made by the specific Division to which they are assigned, on the basis of criteria that are specifically adapted to the business concerned.

Company savings plan (PEG) was created inplans and employee share ownership policy

Since 2002, in order to allow our employees to transfer savings previously invested in Vivendi Universal’s savings plan to a new savings plan established by us.

Our group employees therebyhave had the possibility of investing in various instruments of our Group Savings Plan(GSP), called “Sequoia”, including monetarydiversified funds and funds invested in our shares.

After a first capital increase reserved exclusively for French employees, we decided in 2004 to offer our foreign employees the possibility of acquiring shares in the Company during reserved capital increases. The plan was progressively extended at the international level (it now covers 29 countries, including France, all mechanisms combined).

We offer two employee shareholder plans: a “classic” plan, in which the employee is exposed to changes in listed share prices, and structured investment funds that guaranteed the preservation of capital and allowed for growth potential upon any increasea “low-risk” plan (with or without leverage), which protects employees from a fall in the price of our company’s shares.

We conducted a share capital increase in December 2002 that was reserved for employees of our group’s French subsidiaries. Given conditions during 2003, no share capital increase reserved for employees was conducted that year.

In 2004, we decided to reinvigorate our strategy of encouraging employee shareholding by allowing non-French as well as French employees to participate in the PEG, with the objective of having our employees eventually hold 5% of outstanding share capital in the future.  The plan was thus progressively made available to employees of our French subsidiaries as well as to employees of subsidiaries located in 19 countries other than France.  Employees of our group thus had the possibility of investing in two different investment funds (FCPE) that hold interests in our shares: a “classic” fund whose value fluctuates with the price of our shares and a “secured” fund that protects investors from a decline in the price of our shares below the original subscription price while giving them the possibility to benefitof benefiting from a portion of the increase, asif the case may be.price rises.

A review ofDepending on the increaselocal particularities, the shares in share capital observedthese two plans were subscribed either directly or through FCPEs (corporate mutual fund). Additional, specific plans were put in 2006 reveals a high level of participation: out of the 162,415 current or former employees eligible, 28,547 (or 17.58%) decided to participate, resulting in a 57% increase in total contributions compared to 2005. Accordingly, the share capital increase finalized on December 15, 2006 resulted in the issuance of 1,931,340 new shares and a corresponding increase in our company’s share capital of €9,656,700.

Given the share capital increases that occurred in 2002, 2004, 2005 and 2006, 47,363 employees of the group own 1.41% of our share capital as of December 31, 2006.  

In total, approximately 65,000 employees have active accounts in our Sequoia savings plan,i.e., more than 1 in 3 employees in the 20 countries in which our group’s savings plan is available.

Similarly, as employees subscribing to our shares via French investment funds (Fonds Commun de Placement d’Entreprise - FCPE) have unfavorable tax and social consequencesplace in the United Kingdom we use an ad hoc(Share Incentive Plan) and in China (synthetic formula referredthat replicates the economic conditions of the “low-risk” shareholder plan) in order to circumvent certain constraints, such as tax and exchange rate regulations.

The most recent operation took place in the “Share Incentive Plan” (SIP) allowing Britishspring of 2009 and resulted in the issue of 911,014 new shares, representing 0.18% of the capital. This capital increase, which was reserved for employees, was offered to become190,000 employees in twenty-three countries. Around 57,000 employees of the Veolia Environnement shareholders under favorable conditions.  The Share Incentive Plan enables employees to purchaseGroup now hold shares of our company through a trustin Veolia Environnement and, paying for them by way of regular withdrawals from their salary.  A bonus mechanism (abondement) similar to that employed in countries participating in our group’s savings plan has also been put in place.  At the endas of the accumulation period (i.e.date of this annual report on March 31, 2007), outForm 20-F, hold 1.7% of 10,902 eligible Britishthe Company’s capital. In total, approximately 70,000 employees 1,155 had decided to subscribe to this offer, which represents a participation rate of 10.6%.have opened an account in the Veolia Environnement Group Savings Plan.



166





Back to contentsContents




ITEM 7.

MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS

The table below shows the ownershipnumber of our shares and the corresponding percentages of share capital and voting rights at June 6, 2007.  held as of December 31, 2009 by Veolia Environnement’s principal known shareholders.

Each Veolia Environnement share entitles its holder to one vote. There are no shares with double voting rights or non-voting shares (however, the voting rights of treasury shares are not exercised).

To the bestCompany’s knowledge, as of our knowledge,December 31, 2009 and the date of this annual report on Form 20-F, no personshareholder other than those listed in the table below directly or indirectly held approximately 4% or more of our company’sthe Company’s shares or voting rights. The Company has not received any declarations of threshold crossings from the shareholders below, except as described in the notes to the table below:

Shareholder at
December 31, 2009

Number of shares

Percentage of share capital

Number of voting rights

Percentage of voting rights***

Caisse des Dépôts(1)

47,273,114

9.58%

47,273,114

9.87%

Groupama(2)

28,234,444

5.72%

28,234,444

5.89%

Capital Group Companies(3)

22,252,765

4.51%

22,252,765

4.65%

EDF(4)

18,287,428

3.70%

18,287,428

3.82%

Veolia Environnement(5)

14,731,592

2.98%

0**

0%

Public and other investors

362,851,031

73.51%

362,851,031

75.77%

Total

493,630,374*

100%

478,898,782*

100%


*

This figure includes a capital increase of 31,011 shares pursuant to options exercised between July 1 and December 31, 2009 and recorded by the Board of Directors at its meeting of March 5, 2010. Issuing 31,011 shares with a par value of €5 each resulted in a capital increase of €155,055. At the conclusion of this transaction, the Company’s share capital had increased from 493,599,363 shares to 493,630,374 shares (see the Table of changes in capital in the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 18).

**

As of December 31, 2009 and the date of the annual report on Form 20-F, Veolia Environnement held 14,731,592 treasury shares.

***

Percentage of voting rights as a share of actual voting rights (Veolia Environnement treasury shares do not exercise voting rights).


(1)

According to the analysis of the Company’s shareholders as of December 31, 2009 and the most recent known declaration of threshold crossing of Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations filed with the Company on June 15, 2009 (AMF Decision and Information no. 209C0862 dated June 15, 2009).

(2)

According to the analysis of the Company’s shareholders as of December 31, 2009. To the best of our knowledge, Groupama’s most recent declaration of threshold crossing was filed on December 30, 2004 (AMF Decision and Information no. 205C0030 dated January 7, 2005).

(3)

Management companies acting on behalf of clients (U.S. mutual funds). Percentage of share capital and voting rights according to the analysis of the Company’s shareholders as of December 31, 2009. The analysis of the Company’s shareholders as of December 31, 2009 shows that companies of the Capital Group Companies group together hold 22,252,765 shares, representing 4.52% of the capital.

 (4)

 According to the statement of registered shareholders as of January 19, 2010 prepared by Société Générale (the account manager) and according to the analysis of the Company’s shareholders as of December 31, 2009. To the best of our knowledge, EDF’s most recent declaration of threshold crossing was filed on December 30, 2002 (Euronext notice no. 2002-4424 dated December 31, 2002). In that declaration, EDF reported that on such date it held 16,155,492 Veolia Environnement shares. Furthermore, in the amendment dated November 24, 2002 to the agreement dated June 24, 2002 described below, EDF stated that it would hold shares acquired in the Company as a financial investment, that it did not seek to influence the Company’s management and that it would exercise its voting rights solely for the purpose of enhancing the value of its investment.

(5)

Treasury shares without voting rights. This figure is included in the monthly report of transactions carried out by Veolia Environnement with respect to its own shares that was filed with the AMF on March 3, 2010.




167



Back to Contents


We received a notification from Group Industriel Marcel Dassault (GIMD) that on March 11, 2010, it crossed the 5% threshold for ownership of shares and voting rights in our Company, by its ownership as of such date.


Shareholders

at June 6, 2007

Number of shares

Percentage of

share capital

Number
of voting rights

Percentage of voting rights

Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations (1)

41,450,055

10.05

41,450,055

10.43

Capital Research and Management Company (2)

40,944,340

9.92

40,944,336

10.30

Groupe Groupama (3)

24,143,946

5.85

24,143,946

6.07

EDF (4)

16,255,492

3.94

16,255,492

4.09

Veolia Environnement (5)

15,145,049

3.67

0

0

Public and other investors

274,687,672

66.57

274,687,672

69.11

Total

412,626,550

100.00

397,481,501

100.00


(1)that date of 24,712,654 shares in our Company, representing 5.01% of our shares. According to the declaration of the Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations to the CompanySchedule 13D/A filed by GIMD on June 7, 2007.  To the bestApril 8, 2010, it now holds 25,884,699 of our knowledge, the most recent declarations of the crossing of thresholds and intentions of the  Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations occurred on December 18, 2006 (Décision et Information AMF n°206C2344 dated December 22, 2006). The Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations declared that it was acting alone and that it may purchase additional shares based on market conditions, but that it did not intend to take control over our company.   

(2) Capital Research and Management Company (“Capital Research”) is a management company acting on behalf of its clients (U.S. mutual funds).  According to Capital Research’s most recent filing with the SEC that occurred on February 9, 2007 (Schedule 13G, amendment no. 2, dated February 6, 2007).

(3) According to our shareholder analysis of December 31, 2006, using Euroclear data.  To the bestrepresenting 5.09% of our knowledge, Groupe Groupama’s most recent filing with the AMF occurred on December 30, 2004 (Décision etshares. See Item 8: “Financial Information AMF n°205C0030 dated January 7, 2005).

(4) According to the registerConsolidated Statements and Other Financial Information – Significant Changes” below for a description of our company’s registered shareholders (actionnaires au nominatif) as of May 31, 2007, which is held by Société Générale on our behalf. To the best of our knowledge, EDF’s most recent filing with the AMF occurred on December 30, 2002 (Euronextavis n°2002-4424 dated December 31, 2002). EDF declared that it held 16,155,492 shares as of that date. EDF further declared that, in accordance with the terms of the amendment of November 24, 2002 to the agreement dated June 24, 2002, it would hold the shares as a financial investment and that it did not seek to influence our company’s management, and that it would exercise its voting rights with the sole aim of enhancing the value of itsGIMD’s investment.

(5) As set forth in our monthly filing with the AMF of transactions it has effected with respect to its own shares, filed with the AMF on June 4, 2007.  At May 31, 2007, we held 15,145,049 treasury shares.


As of December 31, 2006, foreign2009, we estimate that non-French investors held approximately 46%48% of our company’sCompany’s shares and French investors the remaining 54%52%.

We estimate that, as of December 31, 2006,2009, approximately 107,778,74088.9 million of our shares (representing approximately 26%21.8% of our share capital) were held by holders in the United States. As of December 31, 2006, 9,138,1382009, 23,187,843 of our shares (representing approximately 2.2%5.7% of our share capital) were held in the form of ADRs by 16164 registered ADR holders (including The Depository Trust Company). We estimate that, as of April 3, 2007,March 31, 2010, there were approximately 23,19641,000 beneficial holders of our shares in the United States.




Back to contents



On July 6, 2006, Vivendi (formerly Vivendi Universal) announcedTo the completionCompany’s knowledge, there is no agreement between one or more of the sale of 5.3% of our capital, representingCompany’s other shareholders or any provision in a total of 21,523,527 shares, under an accelerated book building procedure. Following this transaction, Vivendi no longer hold any shares in our company.

On December 15, 2006, our company recordedshareholders’ agreement or agreement to which the completion ofCompany is a party that could have a material impact on the Company’s share capital increase reserved for employees of our company and our group, which had been approved by the Board of Directors on September 14, 2006. The shares were subscribed for by several employee investment funds acting as intermediary on behalf of beneficiaries. Following the transaction, 1,931,340 new shares (nominal value € 5) were subscribed for at a price, of €37.52 each, causing share capital to increase by €9,656,700, representing approximately 0.47% of our company’s share capital at such date.  

On June 12, 2007, we announced the launch of a €2.6 billion rights offering. The offering was made through the distribution of preferential subscription rights to all shareholders, giving shareholders the right to subscribe to a total of 51,918,579 new shares (assuming certain outstanding share subscription options granted by us to our employees are not exercised, or up to 52,741,899 new shares if all such options are exercised). See “Item 8. Financial Information—Significant Changes.”  

To our knowledge, there are no shareholders’ or other agreements relating to our shares other than as described above and there is no arrangementshareholders’ agreement or other agreement of such nature to which any significant non-listed subsidiary of the execution of which mayCompany is a party, other than the agreements with EDF described in Notes 36 and 39.3 to the 2009 consolidated financial statements. No third party controls Veolia Environnement and, to the Company’s knowledge, there is no agreement in existence that, if implemented, could at a subsequent date result in a change of control or takeover of the Company. The major shareholders of our company..Company do not enjoy different voting rights from those of the other shareholders.

The following table summarizes changes in our principal shareholders (that directly or indirectly have held more than 4% of the Company’s shares) over the last three fiscal years*

 

At December 31, 2009

At December 31, 2008

At December 31, 2007

Shareholder

Number of shares

% of share capital

% of voting rights

Number of shares

% of share capital

% of voting rights

Number of shares

% of share capital

% of voting rights

Caisse des Dépôts

47,273,114

9.58

9.87

47,273,114

10.00

10.33

48,763,596

10.36

10.70

EDF

18,287,428

3.70

3.82

18,287,428

3.87

4.00

18,287,428

3.88

4.01

Groupe Groupama

28,234,444

5.72

5.89

26,221,588

5.55

5.73

27,171,816

5.77

5.96

Capital Group Companies **

22,252,765

4.51

4.65

43,690,699

9.25

9.55

55,741,994

11.84

12.23


*

Figures are taken from the 2009, 2008 and 2007 reference documents filed with our French regulator, theAutorité des marchés financiers.

**

Figures for Capital Group Companies have been combined to take into account the percentages of the Company’s share capital and voting rights held by all companies of that group.




168



Back to contentsContents




RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Not applicable.Other than as disclosed below, we have no “related-party transactions” within the meaning of Item 7B
of Form 20-F.

Caisse des Depots is a 9.58% shareholder in our Company and is participating in the contemplated transaction between Veolia Transport and Transdev, as described below in this Form 20-F.

Société Générale is a 0.15% shareholder in our Company and until May 6, 2009 shared a Board member with us (Mr. Bouton). It participates in financing relationships with our Company that are conducted on market terms and owned a €17.6 million receivable with respect to our Company at December 31, 2008, which had been entirely discharged as at December 31, 2009.

On November 25, 2009, Mr. Henri Proglio was named the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Group EDF by decree from the French Counsel of Ministers. EDF is 3.70% shareholder in Veolia Environnement, a 34% shareholder in Dalkia and a 25% shareholder in Dalkia International and has commercial relations with our Company.

We have disclosed certain transactions in Note 39 to our consolidated financial statements pursuant to a definition of “related-party transactions” under IFRS that is different from the definition contained in Item 7B of Form 20-F.



169



Back to contentsContents



ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL INFORMATION,

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Please refer to the consolidated financial statements and thein particular, with regard to tax audits and disputes, notes 35 and 42 thereto contained in Item 18.

Litigation

We are involved from time to time in various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of our business. The most significant litigation involving our companyCompany or its subsidiaries is described below. Other than as described below, there are no other current or threatened legal, governmental or arbitral proceedings involving our companyCompany or its subsidiaries, that either had during the past twelve months, that either had or that may in the futurewere likely to have a material adverse effect on the results of operations or financial condition of our companyCompany or the group.Group.

As of December 31, 2006,2009, the aggregate amount of our provisions for litigation was €339€417.4 million including all types of litigation (i.e.(that is, tax, employee-related and other litigation). The aggregate amount of reserves accrued by our groupGroup in respect of all litigation in which we or our subsidiaries are involved (see Note 1816 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 18 of this annual report), includes a large number of claims and proceedings that, individually, are not material to our businesses. The largest individual reserve accrued in our financial statements in 2006as of December 31, 2009 relating to litigation, amountsother than tax and labour disputes, amounted to approximately €12€17.2 million.

Veolia Eau – Compagnie Générale des Eaux


On February 27, 2001, the French Competition Council (Conseil de la concurrence)notified Compagnie Générale des Eaux of a complaint alleging that several joint ventures that it had formed with other water services companies affected the level of competition in the market. On July 11, 2002, the Council rejected the allegations of anticompetitive cooperationcollusion (entente anticoncurrentielle) among thethese water services companies, in question and did notrefusing both to impose monetary sanctions nor did itor issue an injunction against these companies. However, the Council found that the existence of the joint ventures constituted a “collective dominant position” in the market and requested the French Ministry of the Economy, Finance and Industry to take all necessary measures to modify complete or terminate thethis pooling of means arrangement of these companies through their joint ventures. Compagn iearrangement. Compagnie Générale des Eaux contestedchallenged this finding, initially beforebe fore the Paris Court of Appeals, which confirmed the Council’s position. However, the commercial section of the French Supreme Court (Cour de cassation), in a decision dated July 12, 2004, invalidatedoverturned the Paris Court of Appeals’ decision, and foundholding that only administrative authorities had jurisdiction over the matter. Accordingly, Compagnie Générale des Eaux challenged the Council’s finding before the FrenchConseil d’Etat.  The latter refused to hear, which held that the complaint at this stagewas inadmissible (decision of November 7, 2005), since it found that the Council’s decision was only a preparatory act for later action bythe decision of the French Ministry of Economy, Finance and Industry. In lightconnection with the investigation by the Minister of Economy of the naturemeasures to be implemented pursuant to the Council’s decision, the relevant companies were asked to reach a mutually satisfactory solution. On December 19, 2008, Compagnie Générale des Eaux signed an agreement with Lyonnaise des Eaux France (Suez Group) to unwind the joint ventures within twelve months, subject to monitoring by the relevant European competition authorities.

In a decision dated July 30, 2009, the European Commission announced that it did not oppose a proposed transaction and found that such transaction was compatible with the common market and the EEA agreement, without any conditions or charges. The proposed transaction involved Veolia Eau-Compagnie Générale des Eaux acquiring exclusive control of three of the litigation andjoint companies at issue. The European Commission rendered a similar decision in favor of Lyonnaise des Eaux France regarding the lackcompanies allocated to it. The unwinding operations were completed on March 22, 2010. These were concluded pursuant to the agreement of any judgment against our company thus far, we have not accruedDecember 19, 2008, as completed by two contractual amendments, the most recent of which was signed on February 3, 2010. They were completed after approval of the European Commission, which had been re-notified (due to a reserve for its potential outcome.change in the scope of the business of the companies allocated to Lyonnaise des Eaux pursuant to the most recent amendment).



170



Back to Contents


AES

On February 15, 2006, the company Aquatraitements Energies Services (“AES”)(AES) brought a complaint before the Paris Commercial Court of Paris (Tribunal de Commerce de Paris) relating toagainst two of Veolia Eau’s subsidiaries (Veolia Water and Seureca Overseas). AES is seeking €150 million in damages and interest from Veolia Water and Seureca Overseas, based on its claimclaiming that it lost potential consulting fees following Veolia Water’s decision not to participate in a public bid tender launchedcall for bids initiated by the authorities of Abu Dhabi for the construction of a seawater treatment facility. On June 2, 2004, Veolia Water and Seureca Overseas had signed two consulting contracts with AES, pursuant to which AES was supposed to provide consulting advice on commercial strategy and public relations. Under the terms of the contracts, AES would receive fees based on the amount of the market won byany contract awarded to either Veolia Wate rWater or Seureca Overseas as a result of AES’ assistance. In December 2004, Veolia Water and Seureca Overseas terminated these contracts following theirthe discovery of actions taken by the managers of AES managers that they considered to be fraudulent (dolosives), and that affectedthey considered had vitiate their ability to consent to the contracts at the time of signing. In response to AES’ legal actions,the contracts were signed. On June 28, 2006, Veolia Water and Seureca Overseas submitted theirfiled a defense brief requesting that all of AES’s claims before the Commercial Court onbe denied. In light of the arguments made by Veolia Water and Seureca Overseas in their brief of June 28, 2006, rejecting of all of AES’s claims. The latter, after several months of silence, has submittedAES filed a response toresponsive brief before the Commercial Court in which AES reduced its initial claim offor damages and interest in the amount of €150 million has been reduced to €15 million. We believe that AES’After several more briefs were exchanged between the parties, on April 7, 2009, AES made an additional damages claim has no legal or economic meritfor an amount between €25 million and accordingly have not accrued€50 million for commissions it alleged were owed to it as a reserveresult of various transactions completed by the Group in respectthe region. After several procedural hearings during which each party filed one more briefs , the matter was postponed to January 26, 2010 in order to schedule the date of the potential outcome.pleadings hearing. However, on December 3, 2009, all parties signed a settlement agreement concluded without significant impact on the Company’s financial position. As a result, the Commercial Court, in its decision dated January 26, 2010, has noted the termination of the proceedings.

SadeAquiris


In April 2000, Sade,Since 2008, Aquiris, a 99% subsidiary of Veolia Eau,the Company, has held a concession pursuant to which it is responsible for operating the Brussels-North wastewater treatment plant. As a result of extensive obstruction of the plant’s security chambers following the arrival of abnormal and 40extraordinary quantities of gravel and other companies received noticesolid waste through the public sewer lines, Aquiris decided to halt operation of the plant from the French Competition Council of a complaint alleging anticompetitive agreements (entente anticoncurrentielle) among these companies in respect of public bids for 44 public sector construction contracts in the Ile-de-France region (which includes ParisDecember 8 to December 19, 2009 due to significant safety risks to persons and its suburbs).  These companies, including Sade, filed answers to the complaintplant. This stoppage permitted a partial return to normal, but has resulted in September 2000.  The Council filed a supplemental complaint in November 2001, which replaced its original complaintseveral disputes regarding liability for the disruption and reduced the number of construction contracts subject to scrutiny.  The companies filed an answer to the new complaint in January 2002.  However, on October 26, 2004, the Council filed a second supplemental complaint, the stated objective of which was to clarify and supplement the information contained in the earlier complaints.  In respon se to the report received in August 2005, Sade filed a response in October 2005 that contested the Council’s complaint on the merits and on the basis of irregularities in the complaint procedure that affected its right of defense, as well as the absence of proofpossible environmental consequences of the Sade’s alleged anti-competitive behaviorhalt in wastewater treatment services. At this point, the Company believes that these disputes will not have a significant impact on certain markets.  On March 21, 2006, the Council retained complaints against Sade in respect of 2 markets, and imposed a fine of €5.4 million relating to this matter. Sade has accrued a reserve in its accounts to cover this litigation, and has appealed this decision before the Paris Court of Appeals on June 16, 2006. The hearing has been scheduled for September 11, 2007.financial position.

In addition, on June 9, 2005 the French Competition Council issued a ruling against eleven companies (including Sade) in respect of a complaint alleging anticompetitive behavior (allocation in advance of the bids and information exchange) in respect of public bids for various public works contracts in the Meuse department from 1996 to 1998. Sade was implicated with respect to one such contract, which was awarded to a competitor in 1998.  Under this ruling, Sade was fined €5 million, which it has already paid. Sade has filed an appeal with the Paris Court of Appeals, which confirmed the Council’s decision on April 25, 2006. Sade appealed this decision before the French Supreme Court (Cour de cassation) on May 24, 2006.




Back to contents



WASCO and Aqua Alliance International


Inc.

Several presentcurrent and former indirect subsidiaries of Veolia Eau in the United States1 arehave been named as defendants in lawsuits in the United States in which the plaintiffs seek to recoverrecovery for personal injuryinjuries and other damages for allegedallegedly due to exposure to asbestos, silica and other potentially harmfulhazardous substances. RegardingWith respect to the lawsuits against Veolia Eau’s former subsidiaries, certain of Veolia Eau’s current subsidiaries have retained allretain liability relating thereto and are sometimes involved in certain cases manage the managementdefense of suchthe lawsuits. Further,In addition, in certain instances, Veolia Eau or Veolia Environnement has agreed to hold harmless the purchasersbuyers of Veolia Eau’s former subsidiaries in some instances benefit from guarantees given by Veolia Eau or by the Company in respect of the outcome of suchthese lawsuits. These lawsuits typically allege that the plaintiffs’ injuries resulted from the use of products manufactured or sold by Veolia Eau’s presentcurrent or former subsidiariessubsid iaries or their predeces sors.predecessors. There are generally numerous other defendants in addition to Veolia Eau’s presentcurrent or former subsidiaries, which allegedlyare accused of having contributed to the claimed injuries.injuries alleged. Reserves have been accrued by Veolia Eau’s presentbooked for the possible liability of current subsidiaries for their estimated liability in these cases, basedinter alia on among other things, the nexus between the injuries claimed injuries and the products manufactured or sold by Veolia Eau’sthese subsidiaries or their predecessors, the extent of the injuries allegedly sustained by the plaintiffs, the involvement of other defendants and the settlement history in similar cases. These reserves are accruedbooked at the time such liabilities areliability becomes probable and can be reasonably estimable,assessed, and do not include reserves for possible liabilitiesliability in respectlawsuits that have not been initiated.

As of unasserted claims.  

Athe date of this annual report on Form 20-F, a number of such claims have been resolved to date either through settlement or dismissal. To date, none of thesethe claims has been triedresulted in a finding of liability.


1

Subsidiaries of the Aqua Alliance group or of WASCO (formerly Water Applications & Systems Corporation and United States Filter Corporation), the parent company of the former U.S. Filter group, most of whose businesses were sold to a verdict.various buyers in 2003 and 2004.



171



Back to Contents


During the five-year period ended December 31, 2006, our company’s2009, the average annual costs relating tothat the Company has incurred in relation with these claims, including amounts paid to plaintiffs, and legal fees and case expenses, have been approximately US$31.9 million, net ofafter reimbursements by insurance companies. Although it is possible that these expenses may increase in the future, costs might increase, wethe Company currently havehas no reason to believe that any material increase is likely to occur, nor do wedoes it expect these claims to have a material adverse effect on ourits business, financial conditionposition or results of operation.operating results.

Veolia Water North America Operating Services


Atlanta

In 2002, Veolia Water North America Operating Services (“VWNAOS”)(VWNAOS), a subsidiary of our company, concludedthe Company, entered into a ten-year contract in 2002 with the city of Atlanta, representing annual revenuesrevenue of about US$10 million. This contract involvesinvolved the operation of various slurry and effluent treatment installationsplants for the city, the maintenance and renovation of the civil engineering of equipment and the design and establishmentcompletion of a construction program for the rehabilitation of installations.plant renovation work. On June 19, 2006, VWNAOS brought an action against the city of Atlanta stemming from Atlanta’sbefore the United States District Court, alleging the city’s failure to respect its investment obligations, reimburse additional costs of operation and pay bills issued in counterparty for services provided. At this time, VWNAOS estimates its damages to be approximatelyat least US$25 million, excluding damages resulting from furthersubject to adjustments which may arise overduring the course of the procedure.proceedings. On July 10, 2006, the city of Atlanta unilaterally nu llifiedcancelled the contract and, in turn, brought an action against VWNAOS, invoking VWNAOS’alleging VWNAOS’s failure to fulfill certain of its obligations during the executionperformance of the contract. The city claims indemnitiesis seeking compensation of approximately US$35 million againstfrom VWNAOS and has also brought an action against Veolia Environnement directly, in its capacity as manager of VWNAOSVWNAOS’s guarantor under the contract. Pursuant toIn connection with this claim,dispute, the city has soughtdrawn on the US$9.5 million bank guaranteeletter of credit issued to VWNAOS at the start of the contract. VWNAOS believes this move is unjustifiable. AFollowing pre-trial discovery procedure allowing each party to request documents fromand motions by both sides seeking summary judgment, in orders issued on December 8, 2008 and September 24, 2009, the other begancourt partially denied VWNAOS’s claims and scheduled a trial on September 1, 2006all remaining claims for an initial periodJune 21, 2010. Because the court has denied VWNAOS’s claim on the grounds of 10 months. Our company contests the city’s claims and intends to defend itself vigorously. Atwrongful termination of the contract, the amount of VWNAOS’s claim has been reduced accordingly. Taking this point inadjustment into account, the procedure, our companyCompany believes that this matter will not have a significants ignificant impact on our company’sits financial situation.position.

Indianapolis

In April 2008, two subsidiaries of the Company, Veolia Water North America Operating Services and Veolia Water Indianapolis, LLC (VWI), were named as defendants in two potential class actions filed before the Indiana state courts, which have since been consolidated. The plaintiffs allege that the meter-reading practices used by VWI for Indianapolis customers were inconsistent with VWI’s contract with the local authorities and with Indiana consumer protection law. The plaintiffs claim that VWI billed customers on the basis of estimates of water usage, rather than actual usage, more frequently than the contract permitted, resulting in overbilling that, although later credited to the customers, deprived the customers of their money for a period of time. The plaintiffs also contend that the methods applied by VWI to estimate water consumption were inappropriate and violated applic able laws. The plaintiffs are seeking certification of a class of similarly situated residential water customers. VWI believes that its billing and meter reading practices complied with its contract and with relevant laws and regulations, and that the claims of the plaintiffs are without merit. It intends to defend its interests vigorously. On January 13, 2009, the court granted a motion to dismiss filed by Veolia Water North America Operating Services and VWI, but granted the plaintiffs leave to refile their complaint. On January 23, 2009, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint against Veolia Water North America Operating Services and VWI, and also named the water department of the city of Indianapolis as a defendant. All defendants have filed motions with the court requesting that the amended complaint be dismissed. However, the date of the hearing to rule on these motions was deferred to give the parties the opportunity to attempt mediation. Mediation was conducted on April 6, 2010, but was not success ful. Accordingly, it is anticipated that the hearing on the dismissal motions will soon be scheduled by the court. Although the preliminary stage of these proceedings makes it impossible to estimate its potential financial consequences, the Company believes that these lawsuits will not significantly affect its financial position or results.



172



Back to Contents


Veolia Transport

DGCCRF – Veolia Transport


In 1998, the DGCCRF (a French administrative body with jurisdiction over competition administrative body) performed seizuresmatters) conducted an inspection and seized evidence on the premises of ourthe Company’s transportation subsidiary Connex (now Veolia Transport) and other companies in the public transportation market, withfor the objectivepurpose of obtaining elements of proof relating to possible anti-competitive practices in this market. Veolia Transport was informed in February 2003 that the Ministry of Economy, Finance and Industry had requested the French Competition Council to render a decision in this matter on the merits.  In September 2003, the French Competition Council notified Veolia Transportserved notice of two grievances that raised the possibility,on Veolia Transport alleging possible collusion among operators between 1994 and 1999 of collusion among operators which mightmay have had the effect of limitinglimited competition at the local and national level in the public passenger transportation market relating tofor urban, inter-urban and school services. In September 2004, the French Competition Council notifiedserved Veolia Transport ofwith additional grievances alleging the existence of an anticompetitive agreement (entente anticoncurrentielle) at the European Union level. In January 2005, the judge advocate (rapporteur) of the French Competition Council transmitted his conclusions, in which a part of one of the grievances was dropped. On July 5, 2005, the French Competition Council issued a decision in which it partially validated the findingsclaims of the publiccompetition authorities, and ordered Veolia Transport to pay a fine of approximately €5 million, which Veolia Transportthe Company paid. The Paris Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the French Competition Council in a decision datedon February 7, 2006 and on March 7, 2006, Veolia Transport filed an appeal with the French Supreme Court. On January 16, 2007,The French Supreme Court found in favor of certain arguments made by Veolia Transport receivedand, in its decision dated October 9, 2007, reversed the report issued bydecision of the designated reporter investigatingCourt of Appeals of Paris and remanded the case to a different panel of the same court. On October 8, 2009, Veolia Transport brought the case before this newly-constituted appellate panel. A hearing took place on April 6, 2010 and the commercial sectionParis Court of Appeals is set to deliver its verdict on June 15, 2010.

Connex Railroad

On September 12, 2008, a suburban train operated by Connex Railroad LLC, a Veolia Transport subsidiary, on behalf of the Supreme Court.Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA), collided with a Union Pacific freight train in Chatsworth, California. This accident resulted in 25 fatalities and a significant number of injuries. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), a federal agency, with which Connex Railroad is cooperating, reached a preliminary conclusion that the two causes of the accident were, first, lack of attention by the engineer, who did not observe a red light and, second, the fact that the SCRRA had not installed an automatic train braking system in compliance with prior recommendations of the NTSB. Actions seeking an undetermined amount of total damages have been filed by the heirs of the deceased passengers and the majority of injured passengers, in the courts of the state of California in Los Angeles, against Connex Railroad LLC, its parent company, Veolia Transportation Inc., the SCRRA and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. These actions have been consolidated into a single case. A hearing specifically dedicated to the issue of liability is scheduled for November 2010. At the same time, Connex Railroad LLC and the SCRRA have brought before the federal courts in California their disputes concerning their respective contractual liability in connection with the suits filed as a result of this accident and are still awaiting a hearing date. A U.S. federal statute limits the total amount of damages that may be awarded for injuries and property damage arising from a single passenger rail accident to occur on July 10, 2007.U.S.$200 million. Notice of this accident has been given to the relevant insurers of the Group. At this point, the Group is unable to determine whether the financial consequences of this accident could significantly affect its financial position or results.

Société Nationale Maritime Corse Méditerranée (SNCM)


Our affiliate SNCM is involved in a number of legal proceedings relating directly and indirectly to the bidding process for contracts to provide ferry service between Marseille and Corsica.  Veolia Transport owns 28% of SNCM’s share capital, and we fully

1

These include subsidiaries of Aqua Alliance and subsidiaries of WASCO (formerly known as Water Applications & Systems Corporation and as United States Filter Corporation), the holding company of the former USFilter group the majority of the activities of which were sold to different purchasers in 2003 and 2004.




Back to contents



consolidate SNCM in our consolidated financial statements as a result of control rights under a shareholders’ agreement, as described in Note 35 to our consolidated financial statements.

The first legal proceeding involves SNCM’s direct and indirect shareholding inOn September 19, 2006, Compagnie Méridionale de Navigation (CMN).  SNCM holds directly 45% of CMN’s share capital.  It also holds a 45% interest in Compagnie Méridionale de Participation (CMP), which in turn holds 53% of CMN’s share capital.  SNCM concluded a shareholders’ agreement with the other shareholder of CMP, STIM of Orbigny (Stef Tfe group), which among other things gave either party the right to trigger a purchase or sale option involving CMP shares in the event of a modification of CMN’s strategy initiated by the other party that causes a major conflict between the shareholders. SNCM gave notice to STIM in July 2006 that it was exercising its option to purchase 25% of the share capital of the CMP (to bring SNCM’s interest to 70%), as a result of a disagreement that impeded the ability of the parties to submit a joint bid for the Marseille-Corsica ferry contract.  

STIM contested the validity of the agreement and the right of SNCM to exercise its option.  SNCM brought an action against STIM before the Commercial Court of Paris (Tribunal de Commerce), which ruled in favor of SNCM in October 2006.  In December 2006, the Paris Court of Appeals reversed the decision, holding that STIM had validly cancelled the agreement because of its indefinite duration (a condition that ordinarily permits a party to cancel a contract under French law).  SNCM has appealed the decision to theCour de Cassation, the highest French court.  If SNCM is unsuccessful in its appeal, then it will maintain its current stake in CMN, and its inability to acquire a majority stake in CMN could prevent it from effectively exercising joint control over the operations of CMN.  

In February 2007, notwithstanding the dispute among the CMN shareholders, SNCM submitted a joint bid with CMN for five ferry routes between Marseille and Corsica.   The joint bid was contested by Corsica Ferries filed a competitor,complaint before a French administrative court and the French Competition Council.  

Before the Competition Council Corsica Ferries contended that the CMN –alleging anti-competitive practices by SNCM, grouping constituted an anti-competitive practice, and that lthe sizea subsidiary of the subsidy requested by the grouping fromVeolia Transport, the Corsican Regional Authority (la Collectivité Territoriale de Corse) could suggest an abuseand the Corsican Transportation Bureau for the purpose of restricting or eliminating competition during a dominant position.  In a decision dated April 6, 2007,call for bids initiated to delegate the Marseille-Corsica public transportation service. On December 11, 2006, the Competition Council rejected Corsica Ferries’ requests, while indicatingdismissed the claim that it will continue to review the case on the merits in respect of the alleged abuse of dominant position, and that the Council could pursue an action independently if it were to determine that the factual evidence supported such an action.  As of the date of this Annual Report, it is impossible to determine whether any such action is likely to be brought by the Competition Council, and if so what the possible consequences might be.  

The initial bid process was delayed by administrative court proceedings, ending in a decision by the Conseil d’Etat (the highest French administrative court) in December 2006.  Following this decision,cartel existed between the Corsican Regional Authority, launchedthe Corsican Transportation Bureau and SNCM, and denied the claims of excessive subsidies and cross-subsidies asserted by Corsica Ferries. However, the Competition Council found that the overall indivisible offer of SNCM was likely to constitute an abuse of dominant position. Although it relates to a second bid process.  Corsica Ferries contested this process in a summary proceeding, but its positioncall for bids that was rejectedinvalid ated by a decision of the Conseil d’Etat in June 2007.  The contractDecember 2006, the Competition Council investigated the case and a hearing was subsequently awardedheld on December 9, 2008. In a decision dated February 27, 2009, the Competition Council ruled against SNCM and levied a fine of €300,000 for abuse of dominant position. SNCM decided to appeal this decision to the CMN /Paris Court of Appeals. In a decision dated March 9, 2010, the Paris Court of Appeals affirmed the Competition Council’s decision and SNCM group, with service scheduledfiled an appeal against this decision.



173



Back to begin on July 1, 2007.  Contents

There remains outstanding an administrative proceeding on

In a second case brought before the merits, pursuant to which Corsica Ferries has requested the cancellation of the decision of the Corsican Regional Authority to launch the new bid process. SNCM is notCompetition Council after a party to this proceeding.  If successful, this action could lead to a newsecond call for tenders.  However, in light of the decisions that have been rendered so far, in particularbids procedure was initiated following the decision of the Conseil d’Etat, Corsica Ferries contended that SNCM and CMN had formed an unjustified grouping that constituted an anti-competitive cartel, that this grouping constituted an abuse of a dominant position and, lastly, that presenting a bid requesting excessive subsides, suggesting the existence of cross-subsidies, constituted an abuse of a dominant position. On April 6, 2007, the Competition Council dismissed the two claims concerning the grouping. Proceedings on the merits and the investigation of the French Competition Authority (formerly, the Competition Council) on the claim of excessive subsidies are underway. The investigation is also focusing on the performance terms of this agreement delegating a public service (monitoring the applicat ion of the guaranteed receipts clause and the corresponding changes in the amount of subsidies received by the parties being awarded the contract). As of this date, no complaint has been served.

In addition, Corsica Ferries brought suit before the administrative courts, which ended in a decision by the Conseil d’Etat in December 2006 and a second call for bids procedure. Following a new complaint of Corsica Ferries with respect to this second bid procedure, its request for the invalidation of the decision of June 5,7, 2007 we believeawarding the contract for marine service to Corsica to the SNCM/CMN group for the 2007-2013 period was denied by a judgment of the Bastia administrative court on January 24, 2008. Corsica Ferries appealed this decision to the Marseille administrative court of appeal. The case may be heard in 2010.

Lastly, Veolia Transport’s acquisition of an interest in SNCM was conditioned on the European Commission approving the privatization provisions concerning state assistance. The French government was responsible for this procedure in Brussels and filed briefs on November 16, 2006 and April 27, 2007. The European Commission ruled on July 8, 2008 that the actionamounts paid by the French government in connection with the privatization process either did not constitute state assistance or were compatible with the common market. Corsica Ferries and the STIM d’Orbigny (Stef Tfe group) have each appealed the Commission’s decision before the European Court of First Instance. On July 1, 2009, the French government and SNCM were granted leave to intervene in support of the conclusions of the Commission, which raised the defense that the appeal of STIM d’Orbigny was inadmissible. SNCM filed its brief on September 28, 2009, to which Corsica Ferries replied on November 26, 2009.

Veolia Propreté

On April 16, 2008, Termo Energia Calabria S.p.a. (TEC), a company specialized in waste incineration and a 90% subsidiary of Veolia Servizi Ambientali Tecnitalia S.p.a. (VSAT), which is in turn a 75% subsidiary of Veolia Propreté, filed a claim with the administrative court of the region of Calabria in Italy for the payment of subsidies in an updated amount of €26.9 million, allegedly owed under a concession agreement entered into on October 17, 2000 with the region of Calabria. On August 11, 2008, the administrative court ordered the region to respond to this claim. At the end of November 2008, the region announced its refusal to pay the subsidies claimed. In addition, on May 16, 2008, TEC filed a claim with an Italian arbitration tribunal against the Extraordinary Commissioner of Calabria seeking reimbursement of €62.2 million for various additional operating fees and costs incurred since 2005 and claiming breach of the price indexation provision included in the concession agreement. The arbitration proceedings began and, on October 24, 2008, the Extraordinary Commissioner of Calabria filed a counterclaim against TEC seeking the termination of the concession agreement and the payment of the sum of €62.3 million as compensation for construction delays. The Company considers the Commissioner’s claims to be groundless and therefore has not booked any provisions for this dispute.

In addition, VSAT has been accused of manipulating the software that monitors carbon monoxide emissions in its incineration facilities in Falascaia, Vercelli and Brindisi. In all three cases, VSAT filed a relatively small chance“John Doe” complaint in June 2008, August 2008 and February 2009, respectively, each of success.which is currently being investigated.

For all of these reasons, in early 2009 Veolia Propreté decided to initiate negotiations with the Italian company Termomeccanica Ecologia S.p.a. pursuant to the seller’s guarantee granted by Termomeccanica Ecologia S.p.a. in the agreement pursuant to which VSAT was sold to Veolia Propreté in 2007. In light of the repeated refusal of Termomeccanica Ecologia S.p.a. to compensate VSAT pursuant to its guarantee, on May 19, 2009, Veolia Propreté and Veolia Servizi Ambientali S.p.a., the parent companies of VSAT, filed a request for arbitration with the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC). The arbitration tribunal was formed in August 2009 and has set a schedule calling for a hearing in December 2010 and an award in June 2011 at the earliest.

Under these circumstances, the relations between the Board members of VSAT and those of the 25% minority owner, the company SIEE, have been strained. SIEE has filed a request for the judicial revocation of the VSAT Board Members and the designation of an administrator appointed by the court. On October 1, 2009, SIEE’s request was denied by the court of La Spezia, but an order of the Genoa Appeals Court, served on VSAT on February 24, 2010 named an administrator appointed by the court, starting from March 4, 2010 and whose mandate shall be to prepare a report within a maximum six-month delay.

At this point, the Company is not in a position to predict whether the outcome of these actions will have a significant impact on its financial position or results.

Proactiva

174



Back to Contents


Veolia Energy

Dalkia

On September 22, 19993, 1970, a concession agreement was concluded between Prodith, a subsidiary of Dalkia France, and February 10, 2000, several lawsuits were filed in the Commonwealth Court in Arecibo, Puerto Rico (transferred to San Juan, followingLyon metropolitan authority (Communauté Urbaine de Lyon), which called for the construction and operation, for an initial 30-year period, of a public heating and cooling system service on behalf of the Lyon metropolitan authority. Following the decision of the Supreme CourtLyon metropolitan authority to terminate the agreement early on January 21, 2003 and the disagreement between the parties concerning the compensation owed to Prodith, Prodith brought an action before the Lyon administrative court seeking a judgment ordering the Lyon metropolitan authority to pay it €58.7 million. In a judgment issued on May 16, 2007, the Lyon administrative court denied Prodith’s claims for compensation on the grounds that the concession agreement and the amendments theret o were void because the Lyon metropolitan authority lacked the power to sign the agreement in 1970. Prodith appealed that judgment, while amending its indemnity claim to demand only €47.8 million. In a decision dated October 22, 2009, the Lyon administrative court of Puerto Rico) against, among others, Compañía de Aguas de Puerto Rico, or CAPR. CAPR was a subsidiary of Aqua Alliance until 2000, when it was transferred to Proactiva, our joint venture with FCC. The complaints allege that CAPR operated (until June 2002) a wastewater treatment facility in Barceloneta, Puerto Rico, that emitted offensive odors and hazardous substances intoappeal reversed the environment, which damaged the healthjudgment of the plaintiffs, a groupadministrative court but nevertheless held that the agreement was void due to the Lyon metropolitan authority’s lack of local residents.  On August 11, 2003,power to sign it and, on those grounds, found that the SupremeLyon metropolitan authority was not contractually liable. With regard to the consequences of this invalidity, the Court of Puerto Rico overturneddenied Prodith’s claims for compensation on the ordernon-contractual grounds that the company had not proved that it had been impoverished because it had generated profits during the performance of the agreement, and it denied Prodith’s claim for lost profits on the grounds that the agreement had been performed for its full term. However, the Court confirmed Prodith’s property rights to the land on w hich the Lafayette thermal power plant is located. On December 22, 2009, the company appealed the decision of October 22, 2009 to the Conseil d’Etat.

After the agreement with Prodith was terminated, the Lyon metropolitan authority initiated a competitive bid procedure to award the contract for providing a public heating and cooling system service. At the conclusion of this procedure, the contract was awarded to Dalkia France, which was replaced by its subsidiary, Elvya. That contract was signed on July 23, 2004. In a judgment dated December 15, 2005, the Lyon administrative court invalidated the decision empowering the president of the Lyon metropolitan authority to sign the agreement with Dalkia France on the grounds that there had been no prior consultation of the Lyon metropolitan authority’s joint committee (comité mixte paritaire) and that the principle requiring equal treatment of all bidders had been breached as a result of a late change in the bid package. The court held that the nature of the defects af fecting the decision to sign the agreement delegating this public service necessarily invalidated the agreement. In a decision dated February 8, 2007, the Lyon administrative court of first instance authorizingappeals affirmed this judgment and gave the consolidationparties a period of 18 months to attempt to rescind the agreement in an amicable manner. Because no amicable resolution proved possible, on June 25, 2007, the Lyon metropolitan authority brought an action before the Lyon administrative court requesting a rescission of the lawsuitsagreement and a finding on damages. Elvya claimed compensation in the amount of €68.8 million. In a judgment dated October 22, 2009, the court rescinded the agreement and held that, on the grounds of the different plaintiffs, leaving this question openmetropolitan authority’s tortious conduct inducing reliance (responsabilité quasi contractuelle), Elvya was entitled to further debate.be compensated for its necessary expenditures, the amount of which was to be determined by a panel of experts. The lawsuit is cu rrentlycourt also held that the tortious liability of the Lyon met ropolitan authority would be reduced by 50% on the grounds that Dalkia France could not have been unaware of the irregularities in the preliminary stage of determining damages and responsibility. Concurrently,competitive bid procedure.

At this point, the Company considers that these disputes should not have a mediation proceeding commencedsignificant impact on May 28, 2003, at the request of the court and all parties, in order to find a complete solution to this litigation. This mediation proceeding has not yet resulted in a specific proposal. However, during the course of the mediation proceeding, it became apparent that if CAPR were to be held liable despite the arguments that it has presented, it would be indemnified by the“Administración de Acueductos y Alcantarillados”  (“AAA”), principal defendant in this case, pursuant to an agreement entitled “Comprehensive Settlement Agreement” entered into between CAPR and AAA on March 3, 2003.  Total damages sought against all defendants currently amount to approximately US$300 million. In light of the state of advancement of these two proceedings, we have not accrued a reserve for the potential outcome of this litigation.its financial position or results.

Dividend Policy

TheOur Company’s dividend policy is determined by our Board of Directors, sets our company’s dividend policy, and in doing sowhich may consider a number of factors, including our financial performance and net income, as well as the dividends paid by other French and international companies in the same sector. We cannot guarantee the amount of dividends that may be paid in respect of any fiscal year. However, we have announced and confirmed that our objective is



175



Back to regularly increase the amount of dividends paid; for 2007, dividends should increase by at least 10%; after 2007, we intend to maintain our dividend distribution policy (between 50 and 60% of adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent).Contents


SIGNIFICANT CHANGES

The following discussioninformation should be read in conjunction with our discussion of the evolution of our business, our financial condition, our results of operations and a comparison of our operating results and financial condition in preceding periods included in




Back to contents



“Item “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.” It contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those described under “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors.” Our results may differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements.

Since the date of our consolidated financial statements, we have pursued our strategic goals to increase organic growth, obtain new contracts and enter into new partnerships and alliances.  The following are the most significant developments in our businesses since December 31, 2006.

GeneralVeolia Environnement

On March 24, 2010, the Company published press releases relating to changes to its Board of Directors that will be proposed at the general shareholders�� meeting to be held on May 7, 2010. The Board of Directors decided to seek approval for the appointment of the following new Directors: Antoine Frérot, Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Environnement, and Groupe Industriel Marcel Dassault (GIMD) as represented by its Deputy Managing Director, Olivier Costa de Beauregard. It will further be proposed to add a “censeur” (non-voting Board Member), which position shall be filled by Thierry Dassault. GIMD is proposed to be a director as a legal entity, which is possible under French corporate law.

Veolia Environnement welcomes GIMD as a shareholder, which strengthens the Company’s long-term shareholder base and constitutes a responsible and involved commitment to support the Company in the implementation of it strategy. At its meeting held on March 24, 2010, the Board of Directors noted GIMD’s undertaking to maintain its shareholding stake at 5% of the stock and voting rights of Veolia Environnement for a five year period. As a consequence, it decided to seek approval at the general shareholders’ meeting for the appointment of GIMD as Director and of acenseuramong the candidates proposed by GIMD. It was further decided to appoint GIMD as a member of the Nominations and Compensation Committee and the Accounts and Audit Committee of Veolia Environnement, subject to its appointment as a Director of the Company at the general shareholders’ meeting. GI MD’s undertaking to maintain its stake in Veolia Environnement will end if it ceases to hold the corporate governance roles detailed above.

The Board of Directors will further propose at the general shareholders’ meeting to be held on May 7, 2010 to renew Daniel Bouton, Jean-François Dehecq, Paul-Louis Girardot, Serge Michel and Georges Ralli in their term of office as Directors, in addition to the appointment of Antoine Frérot, Chief Executive Officer of the Company. At the same meeting, it will also be seeking the ratification of the appointment of Esther Koplowitz, appointed by the Board on January 1, 2010 to replace Murray Stuart. Finally, Henri Proglio has informed the Board of his intention to retire from his position as Chairman of the Board by the end of 2010.

On March 24, 2010, Veolia Environnment announced that it had received notices of proposed adjustments (NOPAs) from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) relating to a number of tax positions relating to its U.S. subsidiaries, including primarily tax losses resulting from the reorganization of the former US Filter. See Note 42 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 18 of this annual report on Form 20-F for further details.

On April 16, 2010, Veolia Environnement and the Qatari Diar fund announced the signature of an agreement aiming to set up a long-term strategic partnership, including the acquisition by Qatari Diar of a 5% stake in Veolia Environnement’s capital with full voting rights. The acquisition of this stake in Veolia Environnement’s capital reflects the two groups’ mutual ambition to work together on infrastructure and utilities projects in the Middle East and North Africa. In the longer term, the partnership could also be extended to those countries in which the Qatari Diar fund has developed its presence. In addition, this agreement stipulates that the company Qatari Diar will be appointed to Veolia Environnement’s board, subject to approval at Veolia Environnement’s Annual Shareholders Meeting on 7th May, 2010. Qatari Diar has indicated to Veolia Environnement tha t it will hold its stake and its voting rights for three years.


Veolia Eau

On February 26, 2007, we issued3, 2010, the protocol signed with Lyonnaise des Eaux on December 19, 2008 was amended to organize the redistribution of the joint subsidiaries of Veolia Eau-CGE and Lyonnaise des Eaux France. As a €200result, Veolia Eau increased its control of the Société des Eaux de Marseille and of the Société des Eaux d’Arles. The redistribution of the joint subsidiaries was completed on March 22, 2010. In 2009, the entities redistributed to Lyonnaise des Eaux contributed €150 million bond on international markets atto the revenue of the Group, and the entities redistributed to Veolia Eau contributed €136 million.



176



Back to Contents


Veolia Propreté

The operating contract for the Miami-Dade waste-to-energy plant was transferred in February 2010 to Covanta Holding Corporation, completing the sale of Veolia Propreté’s portfolio of North American waste-to-energy contracts announced in July 2009 and encompassing management and maintenance contracts for seven sites.

In February 2010, following a 3-month Euribor rate, maturing on August 26, 2008.  The bond was issued under the EMTN (Euro Medium Term Notes) program put in place in June 2001.  In May 2007, we proceededcall for tenders, Veolia Propreté renewed its recycling and waste management contract with the annual updateCity of our €12 billion EMTN program.  On May 24, 2007, we issuedWestminster in London. This seven-year contract will commence in September 2010 and includes an extension option for a €1 billion bond,further seven years. It is expected to generate estimated cumulative revenue over seven years of approximately €298 million.

Dalkia

In line with its development strategy focusing on the biomass sector in France, Dalkia was selected at the end of January 2010 for seven projects for combined heating and electrical power plants fired by biomass (CR3).

As part of the strategic repositioning of Dalkia in the Czech republic, Dalkia signed an interest rateagreement on January 5, 2010 for the acquisition of 5.125%, maturingthe entire share capital of Energy.As, which manages the industrial utilities of the OKD mining group. This transaction is currently awaiting approval by the antitrust authorities.

Veolia Transport

In the French overseas departments and territories, the Tram’Tiss consortium, composed of the Colas, Bouygues and Veolia Transport groups and various financial partners, was awarded the contract for the financing, construction and operation of the future Reunion Island tram-train. The partnership contract was signed in December 2009 for a period of forty-five years. The planned forty kilometer line will link the East side of the greater Saint-Denis area to Saint-Paul, for a total estimated cost of €1.5 billion. The entry into effect of the contract is contingent on May 24, 2022.the presentation by the local authority of its forward-looking financial analyses, integrating any additional resources from the French State.

Our combined general shareholders’ meeting heldVeolia Environnement is still carrying on May 10, 2007, approveddiscussions regarding the corporate and consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2006, decided upon the paymentcombination of a dividend of €1.05 per share (a 23.5% increase compared to the dividend paid in 2006), which dividend was paid on May 15, 2007, and ratified the appointments as director of Mr. Paolo Scaroni, CEO of ENI-Italie, and of Mr. Augustin de Romanet de Beaune, CEO ofits Transportation Division with Transdev, owned by the Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations.  All but one of the resolutions proposed during the combined general shareholders’ meeting were adopted.

On June 10, 2007, our board of directors approved a share capital increase bringing out share capital to €2,076,743,160, divided into 415,348,632 shares.

€2.6 Billion Rights Offering

On June 12, 2007, we announced the launch of a €2.6 billion rights offering. The offering was made through the distribution of preferential subscription rights to all shareholders, giving shareholders the right to subscribe to a total of 51,918,579 new shares (assuming certain outstanding share subscription options granted by us to our employees are not exercised, or up to 52,741,899 new shares if all such options are exercised).

The rights offering was launched in the context of the acceleration of our strategy for profitable growth.  We have realized or announced a number of targeted acquisitions recently, including:

·

The acquisition of Cleanaway UK in June 2006;

·

The acquisition of Sulo in Germany in April 2007;

·

The acquisition of 75% of TMT in Italy in June 2007;Consignations and

·

The acquisition of Thermal North America Inc. in the United States in June 2007.




Back to contents



We intend to use the net proceeds of the offering to provide our group with financial flexibility, following the series of acquisitions carried out over the last 12 months, to enable us to participate, on a selective basis, in the continuing evolution of our sector in a number of countries.

Veolia Eau


During the first quarter of 2007, Veolia Eau pursued further commercial developments in Asia and the Middle East.


In January 2007, Veolia Eau won a new 30-year contract in China relating to the concession for water supply for Lanzhou, the capital of Gansu province.  This contract was awarded by the local authorities following an international call for tenders relating to the acquisition of 45% of the municipal water company. This contract is expected to represent estimated total cumulative revenues of €1.6 billion for Veolia Eau.   RATP.


Following negotiations conducted in 2006 with the sultanate of Oman, Veolia Eau signed a partnership contract in January 2007, with National Power and Water, to construct, finance and operate an important desalination by reverse osmosis plant (80,000m3 /day) near the city of Sûr. This 22-year contract represents estimated cumulative revenues of €434 million, including the construction of the new plant.


On May 2, 2007, Veolia Eau announced that it won a new contract (design, build and operate) relating to the extension of capacity of the regional surface water treatment plant of Tampa Bay in Florida, for a cumulated estimated amount of US$158.4 million (€118.9 million). Planned completion and acceptance of the facility is scheduled for the end of 2010 at the latest, the date when plant operation commences for a period of 13 years.

Veolia Eau has also won a new contract in Japan for a period of three years for the operation and maintenance of the wastewater treatment plant of Chiba. This contract, effective from April 2007, will represent a cumulated estimated revenue of €17.8 million.

On June 24, 2007, Veolia Water announced that it won a new major contract in China, for the complete management of the drinking water service and the operation of a wastewater treatment plant in the city of Haikou, the capital of one of China’s top tourist destinations, on the Island of Hainan (South China).The contract, worth estimated consolidated revenues of €780 million over 30 years, was signed with the Haikou Water Group following an international call for tenders for the acquisition of 49% of the Haikou First Water Co. Ltd, which manages drinking water services for 800,000 inhabitants in the area. Our company now operates in 20 out of 34 provinces in China, with a total of 23 contracts, in various municipalities, autonomous areas and special administrative regions.

On June 28, 2007, Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies, through its thermal desalination specialist subsidiary Veolia WST-Sidem, announced that it has been chosen to design and build one of the world’s largest desalination plants in Saudi Arabia, which will provide 800,000 m3/day of desalinated water to Jubail Industrial City and the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. The contract, worth an estimated $945 million (approximately €702 million) for Veolia Water, includes the complete design and building of the desalination plant by Veolia WST-Sidem. It forms part of a long-term expansion plan for power and desalination capacities in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia, which involves the supply of desalinated water and the production of electricity. The engineering procurement and construction (EPC) contract relating to this new water and electricity production plant was awarded to a consortium composed of General Electric (USA), Hyundai Heavy Industries (Korea) and Sidem. Sidem will supply the thermal desalination units by recuperating the heat from the power station; GE will ensure the supply of the power station equipment and Hyundai the construction of the seawater intake unit as well as some related works.


Veolia Propreté


At the beginning of 2007, Veolia Propreté had two major commercial successes.


In the United States, Veolia Propreté was awarded its eleventh operating contract for a household waste-to-energy project in January. The Pinellas plant (Florida) has three ovens and the biggest incineration unit in the United States, which is capable of supplying 45,000 homes with electricity per day. This €19 million 17-year contract represents estimated cumulative revenues of €467 million, including construction.


The London Borough of Lambeth, in the United Kingdom, renewed for seven years its contract with Cleanaway UK, which Veolia Propreté acquired on September 28, 2006. This collection and recycling contract represents estimated cumulative revenues of €156 million.     


The transfer by Brambles of its subsidiary Cleanaway Asia to Veolia Propreté was finalized on February 16, 2007. This transaction includes the acquisition of a paper recycling plant in Singapore (the transfer of which occurred on November 1, 2006) by Veolia Propreté, and the right to collect biogas produced by seven storage centers in Taiwan and China, to be transformed into electricity representing a production capacity of 22 Megawatts per year.


On April 27, 2007, Veolia Environnement announced the signature of an agreement with The Blackstone Group and Apax Partners with a view to acquiring Sulo, the German number 2 in waste management, for an enterprise value of €1,450 million (including financial debt).  The closing of the transaction is expected to occur on July 2, 2007.  It will enable our waste management division to confirm its leadership position as a major waste management operator in Europe, in both the industrial and services markets (49% of Sulo’s revenues) and municipal markets (19% of revenues) and to become number two on the waste management market in Germany, with a market share that we estimate at 11%.




Back to contents



On May 31, 2007, Veolia Propreté announced the signature of an agreement for a controlling interest in TMT, the waste management and treatment subsidiary of Termomeccanica Ecologia in Italy. The transaction concerns 75% of the shares based on an enterprise value (100%) of €338 million, including €250 million of operating financial assets at the acquisition date. The stake may be raised to 100% by 2012. TMT, which reported pro forma revenue of €97 million in 2006, is specialized in the design and operation of waste treatment facilities and is the largest private operator in the thermal waste treatment market in Italy. Finalization of the transaction, which is currently expected by September 2007, is subject to the completion of the last acquisition audits and the approval of the relevant antitrust authorities.  Following completion, Veolia Propreté will be the number one private op erator for the management and treatment of waste in Italy, with an estimated 28% of the incinerating market.

Dalkia (Veolia Energy Services)


At the end of March 2007, Dalkia finalized the purchase of the Hungarian company Sinesco from Raffeisen Lizing. Sinesco operates 26 gas engines on sites (41Mwe of power) installed in 15 independent processes all contracted to sell heat, mainly to heating networks, and electrical supply contracts benefiting from co-generation regulations providing for an obligation by local electricity distributors to purchase co-generated electricity at a favorable price. Sinesco’s expected consolidated revenues for 2007 are estimated at €29 million.  


On January 31, 2007, Dalkia announced the acquisition of Pannon Power, the owner of a co-generation and biomass plant approximately 200 kilometers south of Budapest (contract signed on November 28, 2006). The plant, which supplies the second largest Hungarian heating network also managed by Pannon Power, is located in Pecs (the fifth largest city in Hungary). Pannon Power realized consolidated revenues of approximately €64 million in 2006 and expected consolidated revenues for 2007 are estimated at approximately €60.5 million.


Moreover, the beginning of 2007 saw the purchase of the thermal center “Elektràrna Kolin” in the town of Kolin in the Czech Republic. On January 24, 2007, Dalkia Ceska Republika, a subsidiary of Dalkia, finalized the acquisition of 90.3% of EKO, which includes the production center and the heating distribution network for the town of Kolin. The acquisition of this heating and electrical (299 MWt, 17MWe) production and distribution company reinforces Dalkia’s position in Bohemia.  

In May 2007, Dalkia, through its Chinese subsidiary Dalkia Urban Heating, won a contract for the operation and development of its first heating network in China. This new contract, relating to the operation and development for 25 years of the district heating network in Jiamusi (located near China’s north-eastern border with Russia), is expected to generate cumulated estimated revenue of €650 million during the whole contract and to enable more than 600 employees to join Dalkia’s teams.

On May 31, 2007, Dalkia announced that it would assume the build and operate project for the Southwest district heating network in Harbin (northeast of China, with a population of 9.5 million) through the acquisition of a majority interest in the company YangGuang. This transaction represents for Dalkia an investment of €70 million and a forecast revenue for the first year of network operation of €19 million. The Southwest network will eventually provide heating to more than 17 million square meters of building space in a 52-square-kilometer area. At a future date, the network will be supplied by a co-generation plant. This project makes Dalkia a top-tier operator in heating systems in China.

In June 2007, Veolia Environnement announced the acquisition of Thermal North America, a major operator on the market of heating and cooling networks in the United States, for an enterprise value of US$788 million.  With this acquisition, Dalka becomes a major player in the United States, with a market share that we estimate at approximately 10%.  Thermal North America is present in various regional markets on the leading edge of environmental stewardship, particularly the northeast and California.  Thermal North America is also present in power generation (through cogeneration) and comprehensive building management services.  This transaction remains subject to regulatory approvals, which we hope to obtain at the end of 2007 or beginning of 2008.

Veolia Transport


In the Fall of 2006, a group that includes Veolia Transport was awarded a contract for the design, financing, construction and operation of the LESLYS express Tramway (23 km) between the Lyon Part-Dieu station and the Lyon Saint-Exupéry airport station. The concession company, RhônExpress constituted by the group (in which Veolia Transport holds a 28% interest), concluded the concession contract with the Regional Council at the end of January 2007. This 30-year contract is expected to generate estimated revenues for Veolia Transport of €459 million. The tramway should be operational as of the end of 2008.


In the Netherlands, Veolia Transport won a contract to operate the public bus transport network in the west of the Brabant region. Signed on January 1, 2007, this eight-year contract will utilize 600 employees and 300 buses. Its estimated cumulative revenues are €480 million.

On May 23, 2007, Veolia Environnement announced the appointment of Cyrille du Peloux as chief executive officer of Veolia Transport.  He replaces Stéphane Richard.  Mr. du Peloux began his career in the Ministry of Industry in 1979.  After carrying out various functions within the Bouygues group and holding the position of chairman and chief executive officer of Lyonnaise de Communication, he was chief executive officer of Bull from 1999 to 2002, when he joined the Veolia Environnement Group.



177



Back to contentsContents



ITEM 9.

THE OFFER AND LISTING

TRADING MARKETS

Our ordinary shares are listed on the Eurolist of Euronext Paris market (Compartment A) under the symbol “VIE”. Since August 8, 2001, our shares have been included in the CAC 40, the main index published by Euronext Paris. OurThis index contains 40 stocks selected among the top 100 companies based on free-float capitalization and the most active stocks listed on the Euronext Paris Market. The CAC 40 Index indicates trends on the French stock market as a whole and is one of the most widely followed stock price indices in France. Since October 5, 2001, our shares have also been listed on Thethe New York Stock Exchange in the form of American Depositary Shares (“ADSs”) since October 5, 2001.under the symbol “VE”. Each ADS represents one ordinary share.

The EurolistEuronext Paris market

In February 2005,The Euronext Paris overhauled its listing structure by implementing the Eurolist Market, a new single regulated market which has replaced the regulated cash markets formerly operated by Euronext Paris,i.e., the Bourse de Paris (which comprised the Premier Marché and the Second Marché) and the Nouveau Marché. As part of this process, Euronext Paris transferred on February 21, 2005 all shares and bonds listed on the Premier Marché, Second Marché and Nouveau Marché to the Eurolist Market.

Since February 21, 2005, all securities approved for admission to trading on Euronext Paris have been traded on a single market: Eurolist by Euronext. The Eurolist Market is a regulated market operated and managed by Euronext Paris, a market operator (entreprise de marché) responsible for the admission of securities and the supervision of trading in listed securities. Euronext Paris publishes a daily official price list that includes price information on listed securities. The Eurolist MarketSecurities listed on the Euronext Paris market are classified by alphabetical order. In addition, Euronext Paris created the following compartments for classification purposes: Compartment A, for issuers whose market capitalization is divided into three capitalization compartments: “A” for capitalizations over €1 billion, “B”Compartment B, for capitalizationsissuers whose market capitalization is between €150 million and €1 billion, and €150 million, and “C”Compartment C, for capitalizations less thanissuers whose market capitalization is under €150 million.

Trading on the EurolistEuronext Paris market

Securities admitted to trading on the Eurolist MarketEuronext Paris market are officially traded through authorized financial institutions that are members of Euronext Paris. Euronext Paris places securities admitted to trading on the Eurolist MarketEuronext Paris market in one of two categories (continuous (“continu”) or fixing)trading and auction trading), depending on whether they belong totheir inclusion in certain indices or compartments and/or on their historical or expected trading volume. Our shares trade in the continuous category, known ascontinu, which includes the most actively traded securities. Shares are traded on each trading day from 9:00 a.m. to 5:2530 p.m. (Paris time), with a pre-opening session from 7:15 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and a post-closing session from 5:2530 p.m. to 5:3035 p.m. (during which pre-opening and post-closing sessions trades are recorded but not executed until the opening auction at 9:00 a.m. and the closing auction at 5:3035 p.m., respectively)re spectively). In addition, from 5:30&nbs p;35 p.m. to 5:40 p.m., trading can take place at the closing auction price. Trading in a share belonging to thecontinucontinuous category aftershares between 5:40 p.m. untiland the beginning of the pre-opening session of the following trading day may take place at a price that must be within the closing auction pricea range of plus or minus 1%. the previous day’s closing auction price.

In December 2008, Euronext Paris began migration to a new trading platform. This resulted in the replacement of the current Euronext Paris platform, the Nouveau Système de Cotation (NSC) platform, with a new platform called the Universal Trading Platform (UTP). Products such as our shares migrated to the new platform in February 2009. Until completion of such migration, trading in our shares was subject to the NSC trading rules. Thereafter, UTP trading rules became applicable.

Under the UTP trading manual, Euronext paris may temporarily suspendinterrupt trading in a security admitted to trading on the Eurolist MarketEuronext Paris market if purchases and salesmatching a bid or ask offer recorded in the system would inevitably result in a price beyond a certain threshold, determined on the basis of a percentage fluctuation fromabove or below a set reference price. With respect to shares belonging toequity securities included in thecontinu CAC 40 index and trading in the continuous category, once trading has commenced, suspensionsvolatility interruptions for a reservation period of 42 minutes (subject to extension by Euronext Paris) are possible if the price varies eitherfluctuates by more than 10% from a3% above or below the relevant reference price (e.g., opening auction price) or by more than 2% (with respect to French issuers) from the last trade on such securities.price. Euronext Paris may also suspend trading of a security admitted to trading on the Eurolist MarketEuronext Paris market in certain other circumstances, including at the request of the issuer or the occurrence of unusual trading activity in a security. In addition, in exceptional cases, including, fo rfor example, upon announcement of a takeover bid, the French market regulator (Autorité des marchés financiers or “AMF”) may also require Euronext Paris to suspend trading.trading

Trades ofin securities admitted to trading on the Eurolist MarketEuronext Paris market are settled on a cash basis on the third day following the trade. For certain liquid securities, market intermediaries are also permitted to offer investors the opportunity to place orders through a deferred settlement service (Ordres Stipulés à Règlement-LivraisonDifférés — OSRD) for a fee. The deferred settlement service is only available for trades in securities that have both a total market capitalization of at least €1 billion and a daily average volume of trades of at least €1 million. Investors can elect on or before the determination date (jour de liquidation), which is the fifth trading day before the end of the month, either to settle by the last trading day of the month or to pay an additional fee and postpone the settlement decision to thet he determination date of the following month. At the date of this annual report, our shares are currently eligible for the deferred settlement service.

Equity securities traded on a deferred settlement basis are considered to have been transferred only after they have been recorded in the purchaser’s account. Under French securities regulations, if the sale takes place before, but during the month of, a dividend payment date, the purchaser’s account will be credited with an amount equal to the dividend paid.paid and the seller’s account will be debited by the same amount.



178



Back to Contents


Prior to any transfer of securities listed on the Eurolist Market of Euronext Paris market and held in registered form, the securities must be converted into bearer form and accordingly recorded in an account maintained by an accredited intermediary with Euroclear France S.A., a registered central security depositary. Transactions in securities are initiated by the owner giving the instruction (through an agent, if appropriate) to the relevant accredited intermediary. Trades of securities listed on the Eurolist MarketEuronext Paris market are cleared through LCH.Clearnet and settled through Euroclear France using a continuous net settlement system. A fee or commission is payable to the accredited intermediary or other agent involved in the transaction.




Back to contents



Trading by Veolia Environnement in its Shares

Under French law, a company may not issue shares to itself, but it may purchase its own shares in the limited cases described in “Item 10. Additional Information — Memorandum and Articles of Association — Trading in Our Own Shares.”

Trading History

Trading On Euronext Paris

The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the reported high and low sales prices (in euro) and the trading volume (in shares) of our shares on the Eurolist of Euronext Paris.Paris market.

High

Low

Trading Volume(1)

High

Low

Trading Volume

————

————

————

————

——————

2007

  

May

63.09

59.55

34,468,682

April

61.15

55.30

34,781,004

2010

   

First Quarter

57.10

50.60

99,535,891

26.20

22.81

144,093,238

March

53.98

50.60

35,466,787

26.20

23.32

63,981,898

February

56.67

52.45

27,198,573

24.98

22.81

36,702,154

January

57.10

51.80

36,870,531

25.90

23.16

43,409,186

2009

   

Fourth Quarter

26.67

21.65

117,606,999

December

23.30

21.94

30,981,155

November

23.50

21.65

35,554,795

October

26.67

22.02

51,071,049

Third Quarter

27.10

20.01

115,250,414

Second Quarter

23.15

15.37

132,076,948

First Quarter

23.09

15.00

153,007,114

2008

   

Fourth Quarter

29.86

16.55

204,040,593

December

22.48

17.11

40,369,311

November

20.98

17.36

57,657,493

October

29.86

16.55

106,013,789

Third Quarter

37.94

28.00

153,059,989

Second Quarter

47.90

34.70

184,364.200

First Quarter

63.89

42.00

183,500,344

2007

   

Fourth Quarter

66.25

59.19

114,698,053

Third Quarter

60.96

50.62

141,437,296

Second Quarter

63.09

55.30

135,372,389

First Quarter

57.10

50.60

99,535,891

2006

     

Fourth Quarter

58.40

46.12

97,560,487

58.40

46.12

97,560,487

December

58.40

49.15

29,356,526

Third Quarter

48.69

42.71

119,763,237

48.69

42.71

119,763,237

Second Quarter

49.45

36.49

150,220,240

49.45

36.49

150,220,240

First Quarter

46.40

37.82

97,080,563

46.40

37.82

97,080,563

2005

     

Fourth Quarter

39.14

33.80

98,720,710

39.14

33.80

98,720,710

Third Quarter

35.40

29.56

102,226,960

35.40

29.56

102,226,960

Second Quarter

31.82

27.17

110,251,403

31.82

27.17

110,251,403

First Quarter

28.42

25.21

122,493,492

28.42

25.21

122,493,492

2004

  

Fourth Quarter

26.63

23.11

107,660,963

Third Quarter

23.54

21.02

83,118,617

Second Quarter

23.69

21.06

94,359,760

First Quarter

24.56

21.30

96,749,828

2003

  

Fourth Quarter

21.78

18.08

109,232,584

Third Quarter

19.79

16.00

99,705,921

Second Quarter

20.28

14.58

119,016,453

First Quarter

24.93

14.40

93,519,693

2002

  

Fourth Quarter

25.99

20.09

63,023,202

Third Quarter

31.25

17.18

111,250,501

Second Quarter

39.10

27.00

136,136,840

First Quarter

39.20

33.55

57,297,156

________________________

Source: Euronext Paris

(1)

Regarding trading volume, a new definition was adopted by Euronext Paris in May 2003 in order to harmonize practices across Euronext’s various local trading markets. For Euronext data provided before this date, trading volume included transactions conducted in the over-the-counter market. Since May 2003, market trading activity as defined by Euronext Paris includes transactions conducted on the NSC system, regulated off-market transactions and transactions involving option trading on Monep, but does not include transactions conducted in the over-the-counter market. Trading volumes after May 2003 may therefore be lower than those recorded under Euronext Paris’ former definition of market trading activity.

Source: Euronext Paris

Source: Euronext Paris




179






Back to contentsContents



Trading On The New York Stock Exchange

The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the reported high and low sales prices (in U.S. dollars) and the trading volume (in ADSs) of our ADSs on Thethe New York Stock Exchange.

High

Low

Trading
Volume(1)

High

Low

Trading Volume(1)

————

————

————

————

———————

2007

   

May

86.14

80.64

1,513,500

April

83.52

74.94

909,800

2010

  

First Quarter

74,91

67,00

4,014,770

37.15

31.30

4,337,228

March

74.91

68.20

1,304,700

35.143

31.70

1,602,522

February

74.10

67.00

1,011,570

34.88

31.30

1,295,234

January

73.32

67.61

1,698,500

37.15

32.75

1,439,472

2009

  

Fourth Quarter

38.53

31.50

4,898,227

December

34.63

31.50

1,989,622

November

35.00

31.88

1,126,868

October

38.53

32.28

1,781,737

Third Quarter

40.00

27.72

6,288,772

Second Quarter

31.51

27.07

9,200,208

First Quarter

31.83

19.14

12,239,309

2008

  

Fourth Quarter

41.50

20.83

16,805,689

Third Quarter

56.09

39.10

10,256,268

Second Quarter

74.08

54.16

12,758,488

First Quarter

94.42

64.85

12,454,400

2007

  

Fourth Quarter

96.61

84.25

5,382,300

Third Quarter

86.64

67.11

6,771,700

Second Quarter

86.14

74.88

4,336,700

First Quarter

74.91

67.00

4,014,770

2006

     

Fourth Quarter

75.87

58.00

3,134,000

75.87

58.00

3,134,600

December

75.87

65.61

1,294,000

Third Quarter

61.61

48.80

4,751,000

61.61

48.80

4,751,000

Second Quarter

62.70

46.14

4,357,400

62.70

46.14

4,357,400

First Quarter

56.40

46.15

2,069,500

56.40

46.15

2,069,500

2005

     

Fourth Quarter

46.43

40.70

982,900

46.43

40.70

982,900

December

46.43

42.57

326,800

Third Quarter

43.45

35.75

729,500

43.45

35.75

729,500

Second Quarter

39.65

35.24

1,340,600

39.65

35.24

1,340,600

First Quarter

36.46

33.07

682,700

36.46

33.07

682,700

2004

   

Fourth Quarter

36.45

28.95

584,100

Third Quarter

29.07

25.65

219,500

Second Quarter

28.77

25.05

559,400

First Quarter

31.25

26.79

873,900

2003

   

Fourth Quarter

27.45

20.65

984,697

Third Quarter

23.19

18.30

1,070,478

Second Quarter

23.42

16.00

352,079

First Quarter

26.08

16.04

660,990

2002

   

Fourth Quarter

25.48

20.90

615,272

Third Quarter

30.60

18.10

420,278

Second Quarter

34.20

28.11

243,778

First Quarter

34.20

29.53

128,785

   

____________________________

Source: New York Stock Exchange

(1)

Regarding trading volume, since September 2006, we have relied on data published by the New York Stock Exchange (accessible on the New York Stock Exchange’s website (www.nyse.com)). Prior to September 2006,we relied on data published by the Bank of New York, which included off-market transactions. As a result, the trading volume data set forth in the table above may vary slightly depending on the source.

Source: Bank of New York and New York Stock Exchange

(1)

Regarding trading volume, since September 2006, we have relied on data published by the New York Stock Exchange (accessible on the New York Stock Exchange’s website (www.nyse.com)). Prior to September 2006, we relied on data published by the Bank of New York, which included off-market transactions. As a result, the trading volume data set forth in the table above may vary slightly depending on the source.

Source: Bank of New York and New York Stock Exchange

(1)

Regarding trading volume, since September 2006, we have relied on data published by the New York Stock Exchange (accessible on the New York Stock Exchange’s website (www.nyse.com)). Prior to September 2006, we relied on data published by the Bank of New York, which included off-market transactions. As a result, the trading volume data set forth in the table above may vary slightly depending on the source.

We urge you to obtain current market quotations.



180



Back to contentsContents



ITEM 10.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION

Objects and Purposes

Under our Article 3 of ourstatuts, our corporate purpose, directly or indirectly, in France and in all other countries, is:

·

the conduct of service activities relating to the environment on behalf of private, professional or public customers, specifically in the areas of water, wastewater treatment, energy, transportation and waste management;environmental services;

·

the acquisition and exercise of all patents, licenses, trademarks and designs relating directly or indirectly to our operations;

·

the acquisition of interests (whether in the form of shares, bonds or other securities) in existing or future companies, through subscription, purchase, contribution, exchange or any other means, together with the ability to subsequently transfer such interests; and

·

generally, the entering into of all commercial, industrial, financial, real estate or other transactions relating directly or indirectly to the above-mentioned corporate purposes, and, in particular, the ability to issue any guarantee, first-demand guarantee, surety or other security in favor of any group, undertaking or company in which we hold an interest in connection with our activities, as well as the ability to finance or refinance any of our activities.

Directors

Ourstatuts provide that each of our directors must own at least 750 of our shares in registered form. The French commercial code provides that each director is eligible for reappointment upon the expiration of his or her term of office. Ourstatuts provide that the Board members stand up for reelection on a rolling basis for a maximum term of four years. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Board of Directors—Composition and Appointment.”

Under the French commercial code, any transaction directly or indirectly between a company and a member of its boardBoard of directorsDirectors that cannot be reasonably considered to be inis not made under normal conditions within the ordinary course of business of the company is subject to the boardprior consent of director’s prior consent.the disinterested members of the Board of Directors. Any such transaction concluded without thesuch prior consent of the board of directors can be nullified if it causes prejudice to the company. The interested director can be held liable on this basis. The statutory auditor must be informed of the transaction within one month following its conclusion and must prepare a report to be submitted to the shareholders for approval at their next meeting. At the shareholders’ meeting, the interested director may not vote on the resolution approving the transaction, nor may his or her shares be taken into account in determining the outcome of the vote or whetherwheth er a quorum is present. In the event the transacti ontransaction is not ratified by the shareholders at a shareholders’ meeting, it will remain enforceable by third parties against the company, but the company may in turn hold the interested director and, in some circumstances, other members of the boardBoard of directors,Directors, liable for any damages it may suffer as a result. In addition, the transaction may be cancelled if it is fraudulent. In the case of significant transactions with directors that can be considered made under normal conditions and within the company’s ordinary course of business, the interested director must provide a copy of the governing agreement to the chairmanChairman of the boardBoard of directors,Directors, who must informprovide a list of such agreements and their purposes to the members of the board and the statutory auditor of the principal terms of each such transaction.auditor. Moreover, certain transactions between a corporation and one of its directors who is a natural person are prohibited under the French commercial code.  code: in particular, French law prohibits loans fro m a company to its directors.

Fees and other compensation paid to our directors are determined by the general shareholders’ meetings. The boardBoard of directo rsDirectors may allocate the total sum authorized by the general shareholders’ meeting among its members at its discretion.  French law prohibits loans fromdiscretion by a simple majority vote. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Board of Directors.” In addition, the Board of Directors may allocate exceptional compensation to directors on a case-by-case basis for specific assignments.

Under our companystatuts, after each annual shareholders’ meeting, the number of directors aged 70 or older may not exceed one-third of the total number of directors.



181



Back to our directors.  Contents


Transactions with Major Shareholders

The limitations imposed by the French commercial code on transactions between a company and interested directors, described in the preceding paragraph, also apply to transactions between a company and a holder of shares carrying 10% or more of its voting power (or, if such shareholder is a legal entity, the entity’s parent, if any) and to transactions between companies with common directors or executive officers.

Rights, Preferences and Restrictions Applicable to Our Ordinary Shares

Dividends

Dividends on our shares are distributed to shareholderspro rata. The dividend payment date is decided by the shareholders at an ordinary general meeting. Under the French commercial code, we must pay any dividends within nine months of the end of our fiscal year unless otherwise authorized by court order. Subject to certain conditions, our boardBoard of directorsDirectors can determine the distribution of interim dividends during the course of the fiscal year, but in any case before the approval of the annual financial statements by the annual ordinary general meeting of shareholders. Dividends on our shares that are not claimed within five years of the date of declared payment revert to the French State.




Back to contents



Voting Rights

Each of our shares not held by our Company carries the right to cast one vote in our shareholders’ meetings.

Liquidation Rights

If our companyCompany is liquidated, any assets remaining after payment of our debts, liquidation expenses and all of our remaining obligations will be distributed first to repay in full the nominal value of our shares. Any surplus will be distributedpro rata among shareholders in proportion to the nominal value of their shareholdings.

Preferential Subscription Rights

Under the French commercial code, if we issue additional shares, or any equity securities or other specific kinds of additional securities carrying a right, directly or indirectly, to purchase equity securities issued by our companyCompany for cash or cash equivalents, current shareholders will have preferential subscription rights to these securities on a pro rata basis. These preferential rights will require us to give priority treatment to those shareholders over other persons wishing to subscribe for the securities. The rights entitle the individual or entity that holds them to subscribe to an issue of any securities that may increase our share capital by means of a cash payment or a set-off of cash debts. Preferential subscription rights are transferable during the subscription period relating to a particular offering. These rights may also be listed on Euronext Paris. A two-thirdstwo-th irds majority of our shares entitled to vote at an extrao rdinaryextraordinary general meeting may vote to waive preferential subscription rights with respect to any particular offering. French law requires a company’s governing board and statutoryindependent auditors to present reports that specifically address any proposal to waive preferential subscription rights. In the event of a waiver, the issue of securities must be completed within the period prescribed by law. The shareholders may also decide at an extraordinary general meeting to give the existing shareholders a non-transferable priority right to subscribe for the new securities during a limited period of time. Shareholders may also waive their own preferential subscription rights with respect to any particular offering.

Limitation on Exercise of Rights

Ourstatutsand French law provide that any time it is necessary to own several shares in order to exercise a specific right or to meet the requirements of a transaction affecting our share capital or equity, a shareholder that holds a number of our shares that is lower than the required number may only exercise this right or participate in this transaction if it obtains the required number of shares.



182



Back to Contents


Amendments to Rights of Holders

Under French law, a two-thirds majority vote at the extraordinary shareholders’ meeting is required to change ourstatuts, which set out the rights attaching to our shares except for capital increases through incorporation of reserves, profits or share premium, or through the issuance of free share warrants in the event of a public offering on our shares (article L. 233-32 of the French Commercial Code).

Rights of a given class of shareholders can be amended only by action of an extraordinary generalspecial meeting of the class of shareholders affected. Two-thirds of the shares of the affected class voting either in person or by mail or proxy must approve any proposal to amend shareholder rights. The quorum requirements for a special meeting are one third of the voting shares of the affected class, or one fifth upon resumption of an adjourned meeting. There is only one class of shares of our Company.

Ordinary and Extraordinary Meetings

In accordance with the French commercial code, there are two types of general shareholders’ meetings: ordinary and extraordinary.

Ordinary general meetings of shareholders are required for matters that are not specifically reserved by law to extraordinary general meetings, such as:

·

approval ofapproving our company’sCompany’s consolidated and unconsolidated annual financial statements;

·

electing, replacing and removing members of the boardBoard of directors;Directors;

·

appointing statutory auditors; and

·

declaring dividends or authorizing dividends to be paid in shares.shares; and

approving our share repurchase programs.

Extraordinary general meetings of shareholders are required for approval of matters such as amendments to ourstatuts, including any amendment required in connection with extraordinary corporate actions. Extraordinary corporate actions include:

·

changing our company’sCompany’s name or corporate purpose;

·

increasing or decreasing our share capital;

·

creating a new class of equity securities;

·

authorizing the issuance of investment certificates or convertible or exchangeable securities;

·

establishing any other rights to equity securities;

·

selling or transferring substantially all of our assets; and

·

the voluntary liquidation of our company.Company.



183






Back to contentsContents



Convening Shareholders’ Meetings

The French commercial code requires our boardBoard of directorsDirectors to convene an annual ordinary general meeting of shareholders to approve our annual financial statements. This meeting must be held within six months of the end of each fiscal year. This period may be extended by an order of the President of the French commercial court (Tribunal de Commerce). The boardBoard of directorsDirectors may also convene an ordinary or extraordinary meeting of shareholders upon proper notice at any time during the year. If the boardBoard of directorsDirectors fails to convene a shareholders’ meeting, our statutory auditors or a court-appointed agent may call the meeting. Anyany of the following may requestcall the court to appoint an agent:meeting:

·

our statutory auditors

a court-appointed agent, as requested by any of (i) one or several shareholders holding at least 5% of our share capital;

·

(ii) in cases of urgency, designated employee representatives or any interested party;

·

or (iii) duly qualified associations of shareholders who have held their shares in registered form for at least two years and who together hold at least 1% of the voting rights of our company;Company;

·

in a bankruptcy, our liquidator or court-appointed agent may also call a shareholders’ meeting in somecertain instances; or

·

Shareholdersshareholders holding more than 50% of our share capital or voting rights may also convene ashareholders’ meeting after a public offer or a sale of a controlling stake of our capital.

Notice of Shareholders’ Meetings

We must announce general meetings at least 35 days in advance (or 15 days in case of a public offer for our shares) by means of a preliminary notice published in theBulletin des Annonces Légales Obligatoires (“BALO”). The preliminary noticenotice(“avis de réunion”) must first be sent to the AMF. The AMF also recommends that the preliminary notice be published in a newspaper of national circulation in France. The preliminary notice must disclose, among other things, the time, date, and placeagenda of the meeting, whether the meeting will be ordinary or extraordinary, the agenda, a draft of the resolutions to be submitted to the shareholders and a description of the procedures which holders of bearer shares must follow to attend the meeting, the procedure for voting by mail. The notice must contain a statement informing the shareholders that they may propose additional resolutions to the boardBoard of directorsDirectors either (i) twentytwenty- five days before the date of the meeting, or (ii) w ithinwithin twenty days of the publication of the notice (or 5 days in case of a public offer for our shares) when such notice was published more than 45 days before the date of the shareholders’ meeting.

We must send a final notice (“avis de convocation”) containing the time date and place of the meeting, the nature of the meeting (ordinary/extraordinary), the agenda of the meeting and other information about the meeting at least 15 days (or six days in case of a public offer for our shares) prior to the meeting or at least six days (or four days in case of a public offer for our shares) prior to the resumption of any meeting adjourned for lack of a quorum. The final notice must be sent by mail to all registered shareholders who have held shares for more than one month prior to the date of the preliminary notice. The final notice must also be published in the BALO and in a newspaper authorized to publish legal announcements in the local administrative department in which our companyCompany is registered, with prior notice having been given to the AMF.

In general, shareholders can take action at shareholders’ meetings only on matters listed in the agenda for the meeting. One exception to this rule is that shareholders may take action with respect to the dismissal of members of the boardBoard of directorsDirectors regardless of whether these actions arethis action was on the agenda. Additional resolutions to be submitted for approval by the shareholders at the meeting may be proposed to the boardBoard of directorsDirectors after the publication of the preliminary notice in the BALO, as described above, by:

·

designated employee representatives;the works council;

·

one or several shareholders holding a specified percentage of shares;shares computed in accordance with the provisons of the French Commercial Code; or

·

a duly qualified association of shareholders who have held their shares in registered form for at leasttwoleast two years and who together hold at least 1% of our voting rights.

The boardBoard of directorsDirectors must submit properly proposed resolutions to a vote of the shareholders.

·

Any shareholder may submit written questions to the boardBoard of directorsDirectors relating to the agenda for the meeting at least fouruntil the fourth business daysday before the shareholder’s meeting. Such shareholder must also provide a certificate evidencing share ownership. The boardBoard of directorsDirectors must respond to these questions during the meeting.



184



Back to Contents


Attendance and Voting at Shareholders’ Meetings

Each share confers on the shareholder the right to cast one vote.vote (except that our Company may not vote the Treasury shares it hold). Shareholders may attend ordinary meetings and extraordinary meetings and exercise their voting rights subject to French law and the conditions specified in the French commercial code and ourstatuts. In particular, a holder must have accurately disclosed any substantial interest in our companyCompany (as described under “— Anti-Takeover Provisions — Disclosure of Substantial Shareholdings” and “— Anti-Takeover Effects of Applicable Law and Regulations”) and the holder’s shares must be fully paid up.. In addition, a shareholder is not permitted to vote on specific resolutions that would confer a particular benefit on that shareholder. There is no requirement that shareholders have a minimum number of shares in order to attend or to be represented at an ordinary or extraordinary general meeting.

The right to participate in general meetings is subjectAccess to the recordmeeting is open to such shareholders, as well as to their proxies and registered intermediaries who have provided evidence of the shares in the name of the shareholder or of the accredited intermediary registered on behalf of such shareholdertheir entitlement to attend at leastmidnight (Paris time) three business days prior tobefore the date of the meeting, at zero hours, Paris time,including a certification (attestation) that their shares are registered either in the shareholders’ register held by our company,or on behalf of the Company, or in thea bearer share account held by thean intermediary. The registration or record in the bearer share account held by the authorized intermediary is authenticated by aSuch certificate of participation issued by such authorized intermediary must be attached to the postal or proxy voting form or asbe part of an application for an admission card in the shareholder’s name or on behalf of the shareholder represented by the registered intermediary. A certificate is also issued to any shareholder who wishes to attend the meeting in person and has not received an admission card by the third business d ayda y prior to the meeting, at zero hours,midnight, Paris time.




Back to contents



Proxies and Votes by Mail

In general, all shareholders who have properly recorded their shares, and / and/or duly presented a certificate from their accredited financial intermediary may participate in general meetings. Shareholders may participate in general meetings either in person or by proxy. Shareholders may vote in person, by proxy or by mail.

Proxies, for shareholders wishing to be represented by their spouse or another shareholder, will be sent to any shareholder on request.request received between the publication of final notice of meeting and three days before the general meeting. To be counted, such proxies must be received at our registered office, or at any other address indicated on the notice convening the meeting, prior to the date of the meeting. A shareholder may only grant proxieshis or her proxy to his or her spouse or to another shareholder. A shareholder that is a corporation may grant proxies to a legal representative. Alternatively, the shareholder may send us a blank proxy without nominating any representative. In this case, the chairmanChairman of the meeting will vote blank proxies in favor of all resolutions proposed by the boardBoard of directorsDirectors and against all others.

With respect to votes by mail, we are required to send shareholders a voting form. The completed form must be returned to us, in paper format or in electronic form, at least three days prior to the date of the shareholders’ meeting.

Quorum

The French commercial code requires that shareholders having at least 20% of the shares entitled to voting rights must be present in person or be voting by mail or by proxy to fulfill the quorum requirement for:

·

an ordinary general meeting; or

·

an extraordinary general meeting where only the following resolutions are proposed: (i) an increase in our share capital is proposed through incorporation of reserves, profits or share premium, and/or where(ii) an authorization is proposed to issue warrants with preferential rights to subscribe shares of the companyCompany during a takeover bid period.

The quorum requirement is 25% of the shares entitled to voting rights, on the same basis, for any other extraordinary general meeting.

If a quorum is not present at a meeting, the meeting is adjourned. However, only questions that were on the agenda of the adjourned meeting may be discussed and voted upon. When an adjourned meeting is resumed, there is no quorum requirement for an ordinary meeting or for an extraordinary general meeting where only the following resolutions are proposed: (i) an increase in our share capital is proposed through incorporation of reserves, profits or share premium, and/or where(ii) an authorization is proposed to issue warrants with preferential rights to subscribe shares of the companyCompany during a takeover bid period. However, only questions that were on the agenda of the adjourned meeting may be discussed and voted upon. In the case of any other reconvened extraordinary general meeting, shareholders having at least 20% of outstanding voting rights must be present in person or be voting by mail or proxy for a quorum. If a quorum is not present at such reconvened meeting, the reconvened meeting may be adjourned for a maximummax imum of two months.months with the same quorum requirement. Any deliberation by the shareholders taking place without a quoru mquorum is void.



185



Back to Contents


In instances where we have given prior notice to shareholders that they may participate in a meeting through videoconference or through other means which permit their identification under applicable law, shareholders who so participate shall be counted for purposes of calculating whether a quorum (or a majority as discussed below) exists.

Majority

A simple majority of shareholders present or represented may pass any resolution on matters required to be considered at an ordinary general meeting, or at an extraordinary general meeting only concerning either or both of a capital increase by incorporation of reserves, profits or share premium and/or an authorization to issue warrants with preferential rights to subscribe shares of the companyCompany during a takeover bid period. At any other extraordinary general meeting, a two-thirds majority of the shareholder votes cast is required.

A unanimous shareholder vote is required to increase liabilities of shareholders.

Abstention from voting by those present or those represented by proxy or voting mail is counted as a vote against the resolution submitted to the shareholder vote.

In general, a shareholder is entitled to one vote per share at any general meeting. Under the French commercial code, shares of a company held by entities controlled directly or indirectly by that company are not entitled to voting rights and are not considered for quorum purposes.

Limitations on Right to Own Securities

OurAs of the date of this annual report, ourstatuts do not contain any provisions that limit the right of shareholders to own our securities or hold or exercise voting rights associated with those securities. See “— Exchange Controls” for a description of certain requirements imposed by the French commercial code.

Trading in Our Own Shares

Under French law, our companyCompany may not issue shares to itself. However, we may, either directly or through a financial intermediary acting on our behalf, purchase shares representing up to 10% of our share capital. To acquire our own shares, we must obtain the approval of our shareholders at an ordinary general meeting. In addition, under French law, we are required to disclose through a publication on our website the transactions we carry out with respect to our shares within seven days after their occurrence as well as monthly.occurrence. On a monthly basis, we must also provide the AMF with the details of the transactions we have carried out with respect to our shares during the preceding month.month, if not fully disclosed pursuant to the disclosure rules described in the preceding sentence.

At the general shareholders’ meeting held on May 10, 2007,7, 2009, our shareholders approved a share repurchase program that authorizes us to purchase, sell or transfer our shares at any time, except during a public tender offer, and by any means, including block trades and combinations of financial




Back to contents



derivative instruments, subject to market regulations and the 10% limit provided by law. This program allows us to repurchase or sell shares for the purpose of:

·

implementing stock option plans,

·

awarding or selling shares to employees in connection with a company savings plan established in accordance with applicable law,

·

awarding free shares to certain employees and officers,

·

delivering shares to third parties upon exercise of rights attached to securities that give access to share capital through repayment, conversion, exchange, presentation of a warrant or in any other manner,

·

delivering shares (as exchange, payment or otherwise) in connection with transactions involving external growth, mergers, sales, spin-offs or contributions,

·

enhancing the secondary market or liquidity in respect of our shares through an investment services provider, in connection withpursuant to a liquidity contract signed with such provider conforming to professional rules set forthapproved by the AMF,

·

the completion of purchases, sales or transfers by any means through an investment services provider, in particular off-market transactions, and

·

canceling all or a portion of repurchased shares.shares, and

any other purpose that is or will be authorized by French laws and regulation.



186



Back to Contents


Share repurchases are subject to the following conditions: (i) the number of shares that we are allowed to purchase over the course of the share repurchase program may not exceed 10% of our share capital, or approximately 41,079,584 shares as of December 31, 2006, (ii) the number of shares we may acquire to be held in treasury subsequently delivered in connection with mergers, spin-offs, or contributions may not exceed 5% of our share capital, and (iii) the number of shares that we may hold at any given moment may not exceed 10% of our share capital.

The maximum repurchase price under the program is €90€50 per share (or the corresponding amount in any other currency). The maximum purchase price applies only to share repurchases decided on after the annual general shareholders’ meeting held on May 10, 2007,7, 2009, and not to transactions entered into pursuant to an authorization granted by a prior shareholders’ meeting but providing for share repurchases to be carried out after the date of this meeting. In addition, we can only make payments for share repurchases up to an aggregate amount of €1.5€1 billion under the program. Our boardBoard of directorsDirectors has broad powers to implement the program and set, if necessary, the terms and conditions of any share repurchases, including the power to delegate any of its powers. The shareholders’ authorization for this program expires at the latest on November 10, 2008,7, 2010, which is 18 monthsmon ths after the date of the shareholders’ meeting that approved the program, unless our general shareholders’ meeting of May 7, 2010 authorizes a new share repurchase program.

The share repurchase program approved on May 10, 2007 replaces7, 2009 replaced our previous share repurchase program that was approved at our general shareholders’ meeting held onof May 11, 2006.7, 2008. Share repurchases made pursuant to the program authorized on May 11, 2006these programs are detailed in Item 16E below.

A new share repurchase program will be proposed at the general shareholders’ meeting of May 7, 2010. If approved, it will authorize our Company to implement a new share repurchase plan for substantially the same purposes and subject to the same maximum percentage limits as those described above with respect to the program approved at the May 7, 2009 shareholders’ meeting. The maximum purchase price for shares under this resolution would be €40 per share (or the equivalent value at the same date in all other currencies), which maximum price shall only be applicable to acquisitions decided after the date of the general shareholders’ meeting of May 7, 2010 and not to transactions concluded before this meeting but providing for share acquisitions to be carried out after the date of this meeting.The total amount allocated to this share repurchase p lan authorized may not exceed €1 billion. This authorization would replace any prior authorization granted to the Board of Directors to trade in our shares, effective from May 7, 2010 and if applicable for the value of any unused portion of any prior authorization. It would be granted for a period of eighteen months from the date of the combined general shareholders’ meeting.

As of June 15, 2007,December 31, 2009, we held 15,145,04914,731,592 shares, representing 3.65%2.98% of our share capital. The accounting value (not including provisions) of our total portfolio at that date was €477,040,433,€450,273,550, while the market value was €875,383,832.€ 340,688,065. None of our subsidiaries held any of our shares as ofat that date. We have not cancelled any of our shares over the past 24 months.

Anti-Takeover Provisions — Disclosure of Substantial Shareholdings

Ourstatuts currently provide that any person, acting alone or groupin concert with others, that fails to notify us within 15 days of acquiring,its crossing, directly or indirectly, through acquisition or disposingdisposal of our shares, of a threshold of 1% or any multiple of 1% of our shares or voting rights can be deprived of voting rights for shares in excess of the unreported fraction for all shareholders’ meetings until the end of a two-year period from the date on which such person returns to compliance with the notification requirements, if it is so required by one or several shareholders holding at least 1% of our share capital or voting rights. In addition, accredited intermediaries that hold shares on behalf of non-French resident shareholders are required to comply with this notification obligation in respect of the total amount of shares held on behalf of the non-French resident shareholders.sh areholders.

Anti-Takeover Effects of Applicable Law and Regulations

In addition, the French commercial code provides that any individual or entity, acting alone or in concert with others, that becomes the owner, directly or indirectly, of more than 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, one-third,one third, 50%, two-thirds,two thirds, 90% and 95% of the outstanding shares or voting rights of a listed company in France, such as our company,Company, or that increases or decreases its shareholding or voting rights above or below any of those percentages, must notify the company, within 5 trading days of the date it crosses such thresholds, of the number of shares and voting rights it holds. The individual or entity must also notify the AMF within 5 trading days of the date it crosses these thresholds, which will make the information public. In the event the individual or entity is not domiciled in France, the financial intermediary that holds the shares on its behalf will be required to deliver these notices.



187



Back to Contents


French law and AMF regulations impose additional reporting requirements on persons who acquire more than 10%, 15%, 20%, or 20%25% of the outstanding shares or voting rights of a listed company. These persons must file a report with the company and the AMF within 105 trading days of the date they cross the threshold. In the report, the acquiroracquirer must specify the means of financing the acquisition, whether it it acts alone or in concert with others and disclose any agreement or temporary transfer of shares or voting rights as well as its strategic intentions for the following 12-monthsix month period, including whether or not it intends to continue its purchases, to acquire control of the company in question, orthe strategy it contemplates vis-à-vis the issuer and the way to nominate candidates forimplement it and whether it seeks nomination to the boardBoard of directors.Directors. The AMF makes the notice public. The acquiror may amend its stated intentions, provided that it does so on the basis of significant changes in its own situation or that of its shareholders. Upon any change ofo f intention, it must file a new report.motivated report for the following 6-month period.

If any person fails to comply with the legal notification requirement, the shares that exceed the relevant threshold will be deprived of voting rights for all shareholders’ meetings until the end of a two-year period following the date on which such person complies with the notification requirements. In addition, any shareholder who fails to comply with the specific requirements described above (including the declaration of intentions) when acquiring more than the applicable legal threshold of the outstanding shares or voting rights of a listed company shall be deprived of voting rights for all the shares that exceed the relevant threshold for all shareholders’ meetings until the end of a two-year period following the date on which such person complies with the notification requirements.

To permit holders to give the required notice, we are required to publish in the BALO no later than 15 calendar days after the annual ordinary general meeting of shareholders information with respect to the total number of voting rights outstanding as of the date of such meeting. In addition, if the number of outstanding voting rights changes by 5% or more between two annual ordinary general meetings, we are required to publish in the BALO, within 15 calendar days of such change, the number of voting rights outstanding and provide the AMF with written notice of such information. However, these obligations are deemed to be fulfilled and not to apply to listed




Back to contents



companies that are required to publish and send to the AMF on a monthly basis the total number of shares and voting rights composing their share capital, if such numbers have varied since the last publication.

If any person fails to comply with the legal notification requirement and if it is so required by one or several shareholders holding at least 1% of our share capital or voting rights, the shares that exceed the relevant threshold will be deprived of voting rights for all shareholders’ meetings until the end of a two-year period following the date on which their owner complies with the notification requirements. In addition, any shareholder who fails to comply with these requirements may have all or part of its voting rights suspended for up to five years by the Commercial Court at the request of our chairman, any shareholder or the AMF, and may be subject to a fine.

Under AMF regulations, and subject to limited exemptions granted by the AMF, any person or persons acting in concert that own in excess of one-third of the share capital or voting rights of a French listed company must initiate a public tender offer for the remaining outstanding share capital of such company.

In addition, a number of provisions of the French commercial code allow corporations to adoptstatuts that have anti-takeover effects, including provisions that allow shares with double voting rights and limitations on the voting power of shareholders.



188



Back to Contents


EXCHANGE CONTROLS

The French commercial code currently does not limit the right of non-residents of France or non-French persons to own and vote shares. However, non-residents of France must file an administrative notice with French authorities in connection with the acquisition of a controlling interest in our company.Company. Under existing administrative rulings, ownership of 33 1/3% or more of our share capital or voting rights by non-residents of France is regarded as a controlling interest, but a lower percentage might be held to be a controlling interest in certain circumstances depending upon factors such as:

·

the acquiring party’s intentions,

·

the acquiring party’s ability to elect directors, or

·

financial reliance by us on the acquiring party.

French exchange control regulations currently do not limit the amount of payments that we may remit to nonresidents of France. Laws and regulations concerning foreign exchange controls do require, however, that all payments or transfers of funds made by a French resident to a nonresident be handled by an accredited intermediary. In France, all registered banks and most credit establishments are accredited intermediaries.



189



Back to Contents


TAXATION

French Taxation

The following generally summarizes the material French tax consequences of purchasing, owning and disposing of our shares or ADSs. The statements relating to French tax laws set forth below are based on the laws in force as of the date hereof, and are subject to any changes in applicable laws and tax treaties after such date.

This discussion is intended only as a descriptive summary and does not purport to be a complete analysis or listing of all potential tax effects of the purchase, ownership or disposition of our shares or ADSs.

The following summary does not address the treatment of shares or ADSs that are held by a resident of France (except for purposes of describing related tax consequences for other holders) or in connection with a permanent establishment or fixed base through which a holder carries on business or performs personal services in France, or by a person that owns, directly or indirectly, 5% or more of the stock of our company.  Moreover, the following discussion of the tax treatment of dividends only deals with distributions made on or after January 1, 2006.Company.

There are currently no procedures available for holders that are not U.S. residents to claim tax treaty benefits in respect of dividends received on ADSs or shares registered in the name of a nominee. Such holders should consult their own tax adviser about the consequences of owning and disposing of ADSs.

Investors should consult their own tax advisers regarding the tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of shares in the light of their particular circumstances.

Taxation of Dividends on Shares

In France, dividends are paid out of after-tax income. Dividends paid to non-residents normally are subject to a 25% French withholding tax. tax at a rate of 25% (18% for distributions made as from January 1, 2008 to individuals that are resident in the European Economic Area (the “EEA”), except Liechtenstein). From March 1, 2010, dividends paid by a French corporation towards non-cooperative States or territories, as defined in Article 238-0 A of the French General Tax Code, will generally be subject to French withholding tax at a rate of 50%, irrespective of the tax residence of the beneficiary of the dividends if the dividends are received in such States or territories.

However, non-resident holders that are entitled to and comply with the procedures for claiming benefits under an applicable tax treaty may be subject to a reduced rate (generally 15%) of French withholding tax. If a non-resident holder establishes its entitlement to treaty benefits prior to the payment of a dividend, then French tax generally will be withheld at the reduced rate provided under the treaty.




Back to contents



New Tax Credit

As a result of the reforms implemented by the French Finance Law for 2004 and the French Finance Law for 2006, from January 1, 2006, French resident individuals are normally taxed on only 60% of the dividends they receive and, in addition to a fixed allowance, are entitled to a tax credit equal to 50% of all dividends received within one year (the “Tax Credit”), unless they elect to be subject to an 18% levy at the source on the full amount of any dividends they may receive (which election is available for distributions made as from January 1, 2008). The Tax Credit is capped at €230 for married couples and members of a union agreement subject to joint taxation and €115 for single persons, widows or widowers, divorcees or married persons subject to separate taxation.

Dividends paid to non-residents are not normally eligible for the Tax Credit described above. However, qualifying non-resident individuals may, depending on the provisions of the tax treaty possibly entered into between France and their country of residence, benefit from a refund of the Tax Credit (net of applicable withholding tax) under certain conditions, subject to compliance with the procedures for claiming benefits under the applicable treaty. The French tax authorities have not yet issued any guidance with regard to the procedures for claiming the refund of the Tax Credit to non-resident individuals. Individual investors are urged to consult their own tax advisers in this respect.



190



Back to Contents


Taxation on Sale or Disposition of Shares or ADSs

Subject to the more favorable provisions of a relevant tax treaty, holders that are not residents of France for tax purposes, do not hold shares or ADSs in connection with the conduct of a business or profession in France, and have not held more than 25% of our dividend rights (droits aux bénéfices sociaux), directly or indirectly, at any time during the preceding five years, are not subject to French income tax or capital gains tax on the sale or disposition of shares or ADSs.

However, subject to the more favorable provisions of a relevant tax treaty, holders that are not residents of France for tax purposes and do not hold shares or ADSs in connection with the conduct of a business or profession in France may be subject to French capital gains tax at the rate of 50% on the sale or disposition of shares or ADSs, irrespective of the number of shares or ADSs they hold, if such holders are domiciled, established or incorporated outside of France in a non-cooperative State or territory, as defined in Article 238-0 A 1.1%of the French General Tax Code.

A 3% ad valorem registration duty (subject to a maximum of €4000€5000 per transfer) applies to certain transfers of shares in French companies. This duty does not apply to transfers of shares in listed companies that are not evidenced by a written agreement, or if any such agreement is executed outside France.

Estate and Gift Tax

France imposes estate and gift tax on shares or ADSs of a French corporation that are acquired by inheritance or gift. The tax applies without regard to the tax residence of the transferor. However, France has entered into estate and gift tax treaties with a number of countries pursuant to which, assuming certain conditions are met, residents of the treaty country may be exempted from such tax or obtain a tax credit.

Wealth Tax

Individuals who are not residents of France for purposes of French taxation are not subject to a wealth tax(impôt de solidarité sur la fortune) in France as a result of owning an interest in the share capital of a French corporation, provided that such ownership interest is less than 10% of the corporation’s share capital and does not enable the shareholder to exercise influence over the corporation. Double taxation treaties may provide for a more favorable tax treatment.




Back to contents



Taxation of U.S. Investors

The following is a summarydescription of the material French and U.S. federal income tax consequences for U.S. holders of the purchase, ownership and disposition of our shares or ADSs if youset forth below is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), final, temporary and proposed U.S. Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder and administrative and judicial interpretations thereof, in force as of the date hereof, and the Convention Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the French Republic for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income and Capital of August 31, 1994 (the “Treaty”), which entered into force on December 30, 1995 (as amended by any subsequent protocols, including the protocol of January 13, 2009). All of the foregoing is subject to change. Such changes could apply retroact ively and could affect the consequences described below.

In particular, the United States and France signed a protocol on January 13, 2009, that made several changes to the Treaty, including changes to the “Limitation on Benefits” provision. The provisions of the protocol entered into force on December 23, 2009, and with respect to withholding taxes entered into force for amounts paid or accrued on or after January 1, 2009. U.S. holders are advised to consult their own tax advisors regarding the effect the protocol may have on their eligibility for Treaty benefits in light of their own particular circumstances.



191



Back to Contents


For the purposes of this discussion, a U.S. holder is a holder that is a resident of the United States for purposes of the income tax convention between the United StatesTreaty and France (the “Treaty”) and areis fully eligible for benefits under the Treaty (a “U.S. holder”). You generallyTreaty. A holder will be entitled to Treaty benefits in respect of our shares or ADSs if you are:he is:

·

the beneficial owner of the shares or ADSs (and the dividends paid with respect thereto);

·

an individual resident of the United States, a U.S. corporation or other entity taxable as a partnership,corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, or an estate or trust to the extent its income is subject to taxation in the United States in its hands or in the hands of its partners or beneficiaries;

·

not also a resident of France for French tax purposes; and

·

not subject to an anti-treaty shopping article that applies in limited circumstances.

Special rules apply to pension funds and certain other tax-exempt investors.

If a partnership (including any entity treated as a partnership for U.S. tax purposes) is a beneficial owner of shares or ADSs, the U.S. tax treatment of a partner in the partnership will generally depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. A holder of shares or ADSs that is a partnership and partners in such partnership should consult their tax advisors about the U.S. federal income tax consequences of holding and disposing of shares or ADSs.

For U.S. federal income tax purposes, a U.S. holder’s ownership of the company’sCompany’s ADSs will be treated as ownership of the company’sCompany’s underlying shares.

This summary does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to any particular investor, and does not discuss tax considerations that arise from rules of general application or that are generally assumed to be known by investors. In particular, the summary does not deal with shares or ADSs that are not held as capital assets, and does not address the tax treatment of holders that are subject to special rules, such as banks, insurance companies, dealers in securities or currencies, regulated investment companies, persons that elect mark-to-market treatment, persons holding shares or ADSs as a position in a synthetic security, straddle or conversion transaction, persons that own, directly or indirectly, 5% or more of our voting stock or 10%5% or more of our outstanding capital and persons whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar. The summary is based o n laws, treaties, regulatory interpretations and judicial decisions in effect on the date hereof, all of which are subject to change.d ollar.

This summary does not discuss the treatment of shares or ADSs that are held in connection with a permanent establishment or fixed base through which a holder carries on business or performs personal services in France. Moreover, the following discussion of the tax treatment of dividends only deals with distributions made on or after January 1, 2006.

You should consult your own tax advisers regarding the tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of shares or ADSs in the light of your particular circumstances, including the effect of any state, local or other national laws.

Dividends

Generally, dividend distributions to non-residents of France are subject to French withholding tax at a 25% rate and are not eligible for the benefitof 25%. Furthermore, from March 1, 2010, dividends paid by a French corporation, towards non-cooperative States or territories, as defined in Article 238-0 A of the French General Tax Credit availableCode, will generally be subject to French resident individuals, as described above.withholding tax at a rate of 50%, irrespective of the tax residence of the beneficiary of the dividends if the dividends are received in such States or territories. However, under the Treaty, youa U.S. holder can claim the benefit of a reduced dividend withholding tax rate of 15%.

In addition, if you are an individual Following the entry into force of the protocol of January 13, 2009, U.S. holder, you mayholders should no longer be entitled to a refund of the Tax Credit less a 15% withholding tax, provided that you are subjectavailable to U.S. federal income tax on the Tax Credit and the dividend to which it relates. The French tax authorities have not yet issued guidance with respect to the procedures for claiming the refund of the Tax Credit to non-resident individuals.

U.S. holders that are notresident individuals are no longer entitled to tax credit payments from the French Treasury.described above.

French withholding tax will be withheld at the 15% Treaty rate if you have established before the date of payment that you are a resident of the United States under the Treaty by following the simplified procedure described below.

The gross amount of dividend and Tax Credit that a U.S. holder receives (prior to deduction of French withholding tax) generally will be subject to U.S. federal income taxation as ordinary dividend income to the extent paid or deemed paid out of the current or accumulated earnings and profits of our companyCompany (as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles). Such dividends will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction generally allowed to U.S. corporations.



192



Back to Contents


Subject to certain U.S. holder exceptions for short-term and hedged positions, the U.S. dollar amount of dividends received by an individual prior to January 1, 2011 with respect to the shares or ADSs will be subject to taxation at a maximum rate of 15% if the dividends are “qualified dividends.” Dividends paid on the shares or ADSs will be treated as qualified dividends if (i) the issuer is eligible for the benefits of a comprehensive income tax treaty with the United States that the IRS has approved for the purposes of the qualified dividend rules and (ii) our companyCompany was not a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”), in the year prior to the year in which the dividend was paid, and is not a PFIC in the year in which the dividend is paid. The Treaty has been approved for the purposes of the qualified dividend rules. Based on our company’sCompany’s audited financial stateme ntsfinan cial statements and relevant market and shareholder data, our companyCompany believes that it was not treated as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes with respect to its 20052008 or 20062009 taxable years. In addition, based on our company’sCompany’s audited financial statements and its current expectations regarding the value and nature of its assets, the sources and nature of its income, and relevant market data, our companyCompany does not anticipate becoming a PFIC for its 20072010 taxable year. Accordingly, dividends paid by our companyCompany in 20072010 to a U.S. holder should constitute “qualified dividends” unless such holder acquired its shares or ADSs during a year in which our companyCompany was a PFIC and such holder did not make a mark-to-market election.an applicable election under U.S. tax laws.

Holders of ADSs and shares should consult their own tax advisers regarding the availability of the reduced dividend tax rate in the light of their own particular circumstances.

Distributions out of earnings and profits with respect to the shares or ADSs generally will be treated as dividend income from sources outside of the United States and generally will be treated as “passive category” (or, in the case of certain U.S. holders, “general category”) income for purposes of determining the credit for foreign income taxes allowed under the Code. Subject to certain limitations,




Back to contents



French incomewithholding tax withheld in connection with any distribution with respect to the shares or ADSs may be claimed as a credit against the U.S. federal income tax liability of a U.S. holder if such U.S. holder elects for that year to credit all foreign income taxes. Alternatively, such French withholding tax may be taken as a deduction against taxable income. Foreign tax credits will not be allowed for withholding taxes imposed in respect of certain short-term or hedged positions in securities. U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors concerning the implications of these rules in light of their particular circumstances.

To the extent that an amount received by a U.S. holder exceeds the allocable share of current and accumulated earnings and profits of our company,Company, such excess will be applied first, to reduce such U.S. holder’s tax basis in its shares or ADSs and then, to the extent it exceeds the U.S. holder’s tax basis, it will constitute capital gain from a deemed sale or exchange of such shares or ADSs.

Dividends paid in euroeuros will be included in your income in a U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the date you receive the dividend (or the date the depositary receives the dividend, in the case of the ADSs), regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars. If such a dividend is converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, you generally should not be required to recognize foreign currency gain or loss in respect of the dividend income.

Procedures for Claiming Treaty Benefits

The French tax authorities issued new guidelines in theInstructionn° 4 J-1-05, dated February 25, 2005 that significantly changed the formalities to be complied with by non-resident shareholders, including U.S. holders, in order to obtain the reduced withholding tax rate on distributions made on or after January 1, 2005.

Pursuant to the new guidelines, U.S. holders can either claim Treaty benefits under a simplified procedure or under the normal procedure. The procedure to be followed depends on whether the application for Treaty benefits is filed before or after the dividend payment.

Under the simplified procedure, in order to benefit from the lower rate of withholding tax applicable under the Treaty before the payment of the dividend, youa U.S. holder must complete and deliver to the paying agent (through its account holder), a treaty form (Form 5000) to certify in particular that:

·

you are beneficially entitled to the dividend;

·

you are a U.S. resident within the meaning of the Treaty;

·

the dividend is not derived from a permanent establishment or a fixed base that you own in France; and

·

the dividend received is or will be reported to the tax authorities in the United States.



193



Back to Contents


For partnerships or trusts, claims for Treaty benefits and related attestations are made by the partners, beneficiaries or grantors who also have to supply certain additional documentation.

In order to be eligible for Treaty benefits, pension funds and certain other tax-exempt U.S. holders must comply with the simplified procedure described above, though they may be required to supply additional documentation evidencing their entitlement to those benefits.

If Form 5000 is not filed prior to the dividend payment, a withholding tax will be levied at the 25% rate, and you would have to claim a refund for the excess under the normal procedure by filing both Form 5000 and Form 5001 no later than December 31 of the second year following the year in which the dividend is paid.

Copies of Form 5000 and Form 5001 can be downloaded from the French tax authorities’ website (www.impots.gouv.fr) and are also available from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and from theCentre des Impôts des Non-Résidents in France (10 rue du Centre, 93160 Noisy-le-Grand).

Finally, please note that, as mentioned above, the French tax authorities have not yet issued any guidance with respect to the procedures for claiming the refund of the Tax Credit to non-resident individuals.

Capital Gains

Under the Treaty, youa U.S. holder will not be subject to French tax on any gain derived from the sale or exchange of shares or ADSs, unless the gain is effectively connected with a permanent establishment or fixed base maintained by you in France.

In general, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, a U.S. holder that sells, exchanges or otherwise disposes of its shares or ADSs will recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the U.S. dollar difference between the amount realized for the shares or ADSs and the holder’s adjusted tax basis (determined in U.S. dollars) in the shares or ADSs.ADSs (determined in U.S. dollars). Such gain or loss generally will be U.S.-source gain or loss, and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the shares were held for more than one year. The net long-term capital gain recognized by an individual U.S. holder before January 1, 2011 generally is subject to taxation at a maximum rate of 15%. Your ability to offset capital losses against ordinary income is limited.

French Estate and Gift Tax

Under the estate and gift tax conventionConvention between the Government of the United States of America and France,the Government of the French Republic for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Estates, Inheritances and Gifts, dated November 24, 1978 (as amended by any subsequent protocols), a transfer of shares or ADSs by gift or by reason of the death of a U.S. holder entitled to benefits under that convention will not be subject to French gift or inheritance tax, so long as the donor or decedent was not domiciled in France at the time of the transfer, and the shares or ADSs were not used or held for use in the conduct of a business or profession through a permanent establishment or fixed base in France.

French Wealth Tax




Back to contents



The French wealth tax does not generally apply to shares or ADSs of a U.S. Holderholder if the holder is a resident of the United States for purposes of the Treaty.


U.S. Information Reporting and Backup Withholding Rules

Payments of dividends and sales proceeds that are made within the United States or through certain U.S.-related financial intermediaries are subject to information reporting and may be subject to backup withholding unless the holder (i) is a corporation or other exempt recipient or (ii) provides a taxpayer identification number and certifies that no loss of exemption from backup withholding has occurred. Holders that are not U.S. persons generally are not subject to information reporting or backup withholding. However, such a holder may be required to provide a certification of its non-U.S. status in connection with payments received within the United States or through a U.S.-related financial intermediary.




194



Back to Contents


DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY

Certain documents referred to in this document can be inspected at our offices at 36/38, avenue Kléber, 75116 Paris, France.

We are subject to the periodic reporting and other informational requirements of the Exchange Act. Under the Exchange Act, we are required to file reports and other information with the SEC. Specifically, we are required to file annually a Form 20-F no later than six months after the close of each fiscal year. Copies of reports and other information, when so filed, may be inspected without charge and may be obtained at prescribed rates at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at Judiciary Plaza, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information regarding the SEC’s Public Reference Rooms by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from the rules under the Exchange Act prescribing the furnishing and content of quarterly reports and proxy statements, and officers, directors and principal shareholderssharehold ers are exempt from the report ingreporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions in Section 16 of the Exchange Act.



195



Back to Contents


ENFORCEABILITY OF CIVIL LIABILITIES AGAINST FOREIGN PERSONS

Our companyCompany is a corporation organized under the laws of France. All of our directors are citizens and residents of countries other than the United States, and the majority of our assets are located outside of the United States. Accordingly, it may be difficult for investors:

·

to obtain jurisdiction over our companyCompany or our directors in courts in the United States in actions predicated on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws;

·

to enforce judgments obtained in such actions against us or our directors;

·

to obtain judgments against us or our directors in original actions in non-U.S. courts predicated solely upon the U.S. federal securities laws; or

·

to enforce against us or our directors in non-U.S. courts judgments of courts in the United States predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws.

Actions brought in France for enforcement of judgments of U.S. courts rendered against French persons, including some directors of our company,Company, would require those persons to waive their right to be sued in France under Article 15 of the French Civil Code. In addition, actions in the United States under the U.S. federal securities laws could be affected under certain circumstances by the French law of July 16, 1980, which may preclude or restrict the obtaining of evidence in France or from French persons in connection with those actions. Each of the foregoing statements applies to our auditors as well.




Back to contents




STATEMENT ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 303A.11 OF THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE’S LISTED COMPANY MANUAL

Set forth below is a brief summary of the principal ways in which our corporate governance practices differ from the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) corporate governance rules applicable to U.S. domestic companies listed on the NYSE.


Our company is incorporated under the laws of France and the principal trading market for our shares is the Eurolist of Euronext Paris. Our ADSs are listed on the NYSE and trade in the form of American Depositary Receipts (ADRs), each of which represent one Veolia Environnement ordinary share.


Our corporate governance practices reflect applicable laws and regulations in France as well as those in the U.S., including applicable provisions of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act (see “Item 6: Directors, Senior Management and Employees” for information regarding our current corporate governance structure, including the composition and responsibilities of our committees). Many of the corporate governance rules in the NYSE Listed Company Manual (the NYSE Manual) do not apply to us as a “foreign private issuer.” However, Rule 303A.11 requires foreign private issuers to describe significant differences between their corporate governance standards and the corporate governance standards applicable to U.S. domestic companies listed on the NYSE. While our management believes that our corporate governance practices are similar in many respects to those of U.S. NYSE-listed companies and provide investors with protecti ons that are comparable in many respects to those established by the NYSE Manual, there are certain important differences which are described below.


Our board of directors annually evaluates the independence of its members based on criteria set forth in its internal charter, which are based on the recommendations of the report of a French blue ribbon panel chaired by Mr. Daniel Bouton for the improvement of corporate governance in French public companies. We believe that these criteria for independence are generally consistent with those of the NYSE Manual (i.e., to qualify as “independent” under our charter, a director must not have any relations with our company, our subsidiaries or our management that could impair his objective judgment).  However, the specific tests of “independence” may differ on certain points.


Under French law, the committees of our board of directors are advisory in nature and have no independent or delegated decision making authority. This is different than in the case of a U.S. company listed on the NYSE where, for example, the NYSE Manual requires that certain board committees be vested with decision-making powers on certain matters (e.g. nominating or audit committees). Under French law, ultimate decision-making authority rests with the board of directors, and board committees are charged with examining matters within the scope of their charter and making recommendations on these matters to the board of directors. In addition, under French law the decision as to appointment of a company’s outside auditors belongs to the company’s shareholders and must be made by the shareholders at their annual general meeting upon recommendation of the board of directors. This is different than in the case of a U.S. compa ny listed on the NYSE, where the NYSE Manual requires that this decision be made by the audit committee of the board. Finally, unlike U.S. NYSE-listed companies which are required to have only a single outside auditor, French law requires French listed companies likes ours to have two statutory auditors. In this respect, the requirements and spirit of French law are consistent with the overriding goal of the NYSE Manual (i.e., the audit of a listed company’s accounts must be conducted by auditors independent from company management).


With respect to related party transactions, French law requires the board of directors to approve a broadly-defined range of transactions that could potentially create conflicts of interest between our company, on the one hand, and our directors and officers, on the other hand. While the precise scope of this requirement and its application may differ from those applicable to U.S. NYSE-listed companies, this requirement is generally consistent with various provisions of the NYSE Manual that require disclosure and/or approval of various types of related party transactions.


Finally, as a foreign private issuer, our company is exempt from rules imposing certain disclosure and procedural requirements for proxy solicitations under Section 14 of the Exchange Act. In addition, our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and “short-swing” profit recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules under the Exchange Act with respect to their purchases and sales of our ordinary shares and ADSs. In addition, our company is not required to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or promptly as U.S. companies with securities registered under the Exchange Act, nor are we required to comply with Regulation FD, which restricts the selective disclosure of material information. As a result, there may be less publicly-available information concerning our company than for U.S. NYSE-listed companies. Finally, as a foreign private issuer, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer issue the certifications required by Sections 302 and 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act on an annual basis (with the filing of our annual report on Form 20-F), rather than on a quarterly basis as would be the case of a U.S. domestic company filing quarterly reports on a Form 10-Q.


For more information regarding our corporate governance practices, you should also refer to our articles of association (statuts), which are filed as an exhibit to this annual report.




196



Back to contentsContents



ITEM 11.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

In the course of our operating and financing activities, we are exposed to the following market risks: interest rate risk, foreign exchange risk, counterpartycommodity risk, liquiditycounterparty risk and equity risk.

In order to reduce our exposure to these risks, we centralize the management of these financial risks in order to ensure better control. Activities are based on the management rules detailed in the internal manual “Rules governing financing/treasury management and related risks” widely distributed to Group entities. These rules are based on the principles of security, transparency and effectiveness.

We use various derivative instruments to reduce and manage our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates, exchange rates and commodity prices, not all of which qualify for hedge accounting. All these derivatives are recognized in the balance sheet at fair value.

See Note 32Notes 28 and 29 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information about derivative instruments accounting and market risk management.


Exposure to Interest Rate Risk

Our exposure to interest rate risk is mainly attributable to our financial debt net of cash and cash equivalents. We manage a structural fixed/floating rate position in order to limit the impact of interest rate fluctuations on our net income and to optimize the cost of debt. For this purpose we use firm and optional interest rate swap instruments (swaps, caps, floors, etc.).

Our financing structure exposes us naturally to the risk of interest rate fluctuations. As such, fixed-rate debt is exposed to a risk of change in fair value if repurchased on the market, while floating-rate debt exposes future financial results.

Short-term debt is primarily indexed to short-term indexes (Eonia for the treasury note program and Euribor/Libor for our main short-term credit lines). The medium- and long-term debt comprises both fixed- and floating- rate debt. Borrowings are primarily denominated in euro, pound sterling, U.S. dollar, Czech crown, Moroccan dirham and Chinese yuan.


The following table shows a breakdown of our gross debt before and after hedging :


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

 

Out-standing

% total debt

Out-standing

% total debt

Out-standing

% total debt

Fixed rate

11,290.6

65,1%

10,586.5

65.3%

9,651.4

54.8%

Floating rate

6,042.3

34.9%

5,619.0

34.7%

7,966.6

45.2%

Total before hedging

17,332.9

100.0%

16,205.5

100.0%

17,618.0

100.0%

Fixed rate

9,119.8

52.6%

8,494.8

52.4%

7,166.8

40.7%

Capped floating rate

1,862.6

10.8%

1,751.0

10.8%

1,989.7

11.3%

Floating rate

6,350.5

36.6%

5,959.7

36.8%

8,461.5

48.0%

Total after hedging

17,332.9

100.0%

16,205.5

100.0%

17,618.0

100.0%

Fair value adjustments to hedging derivatives

28.8

 

162.3

 

284.0

 

Total Long- and short-term borrowing

17,361.7

 

16,367.8

 

17,902.0

 


Total gross debt as of December 31, 2006 after hedging was 52.6% fixed-rate and 47.4% floating-rate, including 10.8% at capped floating rates. As of December 31, 2006, all U.S. dollar and euro caps in the notional amount of €1,780  million were in the money.


The sensitivity of financial expenses is set forth below. We manage our exposure to interest rate fluctuations based on floating-rate debt net of cash, with the breakdown of our floating-rate debt by maturity as follows:


 (€ million)

Overnight and less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total

Total assets (cash and cash equivalents)

2,658.0

-

-

2,658.0

Total floating-rate liabilities

(3,360.1)

(1,872.2)

(809.9)

(6,042.3)

Net position before hedging

(702.1)

(1,872.2)

(809.9)

(3,384.3)

Derivative instruments (*)

180.4

1,243.0

(1,814.7)

(391.3)

Net position after active management and hedging

(521.7)

(629.2)

(2,624.7)

(3,775.6)

Caps not activated (**)

 

72.8

10.1

82.9

Total  

(521.7)

(556.4)

(2,614.6)

(3,692.7)

(*)Hedging financial instruments excluding caps which are out of the money.

(**)

Mainly CZK caps out of the money as of December 31, 2006




Back to contents






Floating-rate debt maturing within less than one year is to a large extent hedged by excess cash balances invested at short-term rates. Floating-rate net debt is therefore €3,775.6 million (euro-equivalent), that is 25.7% . As such, 74.3% of net debt is at fixed rates, including 12.1% at capped floating rates. These caps are activated as of December 31, 2006 and, as such, are considered fixed rates.

Assuming a constant net debt policy, a 0.25% increase in interest rates would generate an increase in annual finance costs, excluding market impacts, of €9.4 million.

In 2005, assuming a constant net debt policy, a 0.25% increase in interest rates would generate an increase in annual finance costs, excluding market impacts, of €12 million.

See Notes 19 and 21 to our consolidated financial statements for information about the principal changes in our long-term and short-term borrowings, respectively.

A certain number of derivative instruments used as part of our management policy are not qualified as hedges under IAS 32 and 39. We do not, however, consider these transactions to be of a speculative nature and view them as necessary to the effective management of our exposure.

Derivatives designated as non-hedge break down as follows as of December 31, 2006:

(€ million)

Notional amounts as of December 31, 2006

Fair value of
derivative instruments

Total

Less than  
1 year

1 to
5 years

More than
5 years

Total
assets

Total
liabilities

Fixed-rate receiver / floating-rate payer swaps

336.8

-

8.1

328.7

-

1.0

Floating-rate receiver / fixed-rate payer swaps

281.3

239.3

-

42.0

0.6

0.8

Floating-rate receiver / floating-rate payer swaps

803.2

652.0

1.2

150.0

0.8

8.8

Total firm financial instruments

1,421.3

891.3

9.3

520.7

1.4

10.6

Purchases of caps

2,263.7

700.0

753.6

810.1

27.5

-

Sales of caps (*)

772.8

700.0

72.8

-

-

-

Sales of swaptions

200.0

-

-

200.0

-

2.1

Total optional financial instruments

3,236.5

1,400.0

826.4

1,010.1

27.5

2.1

Total derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

4,657.8

2,291.3

835.7

1,530.8

28.9

12.7

(*)Sales of caps are backed in the amount of €700 million by purchases of caps with the same exercise price and maturity and do not therefore impact net income.


(€ million)

Notional amounts as of
December 31,2005 adjusted

Fair value of derivative instruments

 

Total

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

Fixed-rate receiver / floating-rate payer swaps

752.8

-

2.1

750.7

6.4

0.5

Floating-rate receiver / fixed-rate payer swaps

298.2

-

259.7

38.5

-

4.5

Floating-rate receiver / floating-rate payer swaps

866.0

211.9

654.1

-

0.4

-

Currency swaps

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total firm financial instruments

1,917.0

211.9

915.9

789.2

6.8

5.0

Purchases of caps

2,533.3

-

1,321.1

1,212.2

24.2

1.7

Sales of caps (*)

769.0

-

769.0

-

-

-

Sales of swaptions

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total optional financial instruments

3,302.3

-

2,090.1

1,212.2

24.2

1.7

Total derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

5,219.3

211.9

3,006.0

2,001.4

31.0

6.7

(*)

Sales of caps are backed in the amount of €700 million by purchases of caps with the same exercise price and maturity and do not therefore impact net income.




Back to contents




(€ million)

Notional amounts as of
December 31,2004 adjusted

Fair value of derivative instruments

 

Total

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

Fixed-rate receiver / floating-rate payer swaps

139.6

-

-

139.6

5.5

-

Floating-rate receiver / fixed-rate payer swaps

1,257.1

-

867.8

389.3

4.9

69.3

Floating-rate receiver / floating-rate payer swaps

342.8

154.5

188.3

-

0.1

1.7

Currency swaps

190.4

-

190.4

-

24.1

0.2

Total firm financial instruments

1,929.9

154.5

1,246.5

528.9

34.6

71.2

Purchases of caps

2,005.3

161.4

950.2

893.7

16.9

-

Sales of caps (*)

765.7

-

765.7

-

-

0.3

Sales of swaptions

183.5

-

183.5

-

-

5.8

Total optional financial instruments

2,954.5

161.4

1,899.4

893.7

16.9

6.1

Total derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

4,884.4

315.9

3,145.9

1,422.6

51.5

77.3

(*)

Sales of caps are backed in the amount of €700 million by purchases of caps with the same exercise price and maturity and do not therefore impact net income.


Sensitivity of finance costs:

The portfolio of interest rate derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting generates a certain volatility in net financial income.

As of December 31, 2006, the sensitivity of the non-hedging portfolio to a change in interest rates is as follows:

·

a 0.25% increase in the interest rate would increase the market value of the non-hedging portfolio by €2.6 million, offsetting the increase in the finance cost;

·

a 0.25% decrease in the interest rate would decrease the value of this portfolio by €2.9 million, off setting the improvement of finance cost.


Exposure to Foreign Currency Risk

Our international activities, performed in nearly 65 countries, generate significant foreign currency flows. We are mainly exposed to foreign exchange risk on its balance sheet “assets” position. Our trading activities do not expose it to significant exchange rate risk.

Our central treasury department manages foreign exchange risk centrally within limits set by our Chief Financial Officer. We use derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to foreign exchange risk (currency swaps, cross currency swaps, currency options, currency forwards).

Management of foreign exchange transaction risk:

One of the specific characteristics of environmental services activities is that they bear little transaction risk. Income and expenses are mainly denominated in the currency of the country where we operate.  However, optional hedges may be negotiated with the front office when responding to a call for tenders, prior to obtaining the definitive contract.

Management of foreign exchange asset risk:

Financing is secured in the local currency for operations located in foreign countries. In the case of inter-company financing, these credit lines can generate foreign exchange risk. In order to limit the impact of this risk, we have developed a policy which seeks to back foreign-currency financing and foreign-currency derivatives with inter-company receivables denominated in the same currency.


The asset exposure hedging strategy primarily involves ensuring that our company do not have a material balance sheet foreign exchange position that could generate significant volatility in foreign exchange gains and losses and hedging certain net foreign investments (IAS 21/IAS 39), and notably inter-company loans designated as loans and receivables forming part of a net investment.




Back to contents



Hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation


Financial instruments designated as net investment hedges break down as follows:


(€ million)

Financial instrument

Notional amount as ofDecember 31, 2006
by currency and maturity

Fair value of derivative instruments

Currency

Amount

Less than 1 year

1 to
5 years

More than
5 years

Total
assets

Total
liabilities

Currency receiver swaps

HKD

55.9

55.9

-

-

2.1

-

 

JPY

14.5

14.5

-

-

0.1

-

 

MXN

1.4

1.4

-

-

-

0.0

 

PLN

78.3

78.3

-

-

0.8

-

 

SKK

112.7

112.7

-

-

0.1

4.3

Embedded derivatives (forward sale)

KRW

82.5

15.9

52.8

13.8

2.7

-

Cross currency swaps: floating rate receiver/floating rate payer

USD

299.1

-

299.1

-

36.2

-

Total currency derivatives

 

644.3

278.6

351.8

13.8

42.1

4.3

USPP borrowings

USD

285.1

-

-

285.1

n/a

n/a

Syndicated loan

CZK

203.9

-

203.9

-

n/a

n/a

Total financing

 

489.0

-

203.9

285.1

n/a

n/a



(€ million)
Financial instrument

Notional amount as of December 31, 2005
by currency and maturity

Fair value of derivative instruments

 

Currency

Amount

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

Currency receiver swaps

NOK

HKD

PLN

86.1

13.3

76.8

86.1

13.3

76.8

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.9

-

0.2

-

0.3

-

Embedded derivatives (forward sale)

KRW

100.3

17.8

57.3

25.2

5.2

-

Cross currency swaps: floating rate receiver/floating rate payer

HKD

44.8

44.8

-

-

1.0

-

USD

299.0

-

299.0

-

5.5

-

Total currency derivatives

 

620.3

238.8

356.3

25.2

13.8

0.3

USPP borrowings

USD

302.6

-

-

302.6

n/a

n/a

Syndicated loan

CZK

211.6

-

211.6

-

n/a

n/a

Total financing

 

514.2

-

211.6

302.6

n/a

n/a


(€ million)

Notional amount as of December 31, 2004,
by currency and maturity

Fair value of derivative instruments

Financial instrument

Currency

Amount

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

Embedded derivatives (forward sale)

KRW

116.8

16.5

62.6

37.7

20.3

-

Cross currency swaps: floating rate receiver/floating rate payer

HKD

USD

44.8

299.0

-

-

44.8

299.0

-

-

6.9

44.7

-

-

Total currency derivatives

 

460.6

16.5

406.4

37.7

71.9

-

USPP borrowings

USD

262.0

-

-

262.0

n/a

n/a

Syndicated loan

CZK

216.6

-

216.6

-

n/a

n/a

Total financing

 

478.6

-

216.6

262.0

n/a

n/a


Inter-company loans and receivables forming part of a foreign investment (IAS 21) are nearly systematically hedged by foreign currency external financing or currency derivatives (cross currency swaps, currency forwards) meeting IAS 39 criteria for hedge accounting. Foreign exchange gains and losses recorded in foreign exchange translation reserves in respect of hedging instruments are systematically offset by foreign exchange gains and losses recognized in foreign exchange translation reserves on loans forming part of the net investment, unless:

-

 the inter-company loan forming part of the net investment in a foreign operation is not hedged;

-

the hedge is ineffective due to a difference between the nominal amount of the hedge and the amount of the hedged net asset;

-

only the net assets of the foreign subsidiary (excluding the loan forming part of the net investment) are hedged.





Back to contents



Net foreign exchange losses recorded in foreign exchange translation reserves as of December 31, 2006 of €42.8 million comprise:

-

foreign exchange losses of €11 million on an unhedged U.S. dollar inter-company loan forming part of a net investment (IAS 21), capitalized in December 2004;

-

the impact of exchange rate fluctuations for an amount of €25 million coming from investment hedges in the Water Division in the Czech Republic (€21 million) and Slovakia (€4 million);

-

the impact of exchange rate fluctuations for an amount of €3 million coming from investment hedges in the Dalkia Division in Poland.

Hedging of balance sheet foreign exchange exposure by derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

Each month, we determine our foreign exchange position and enter into hedging transactions once we have quantified our foreign exchange exposure and in particular the overall foreign exchange position. Currency derivatives hedging the overall balance sheet foreign exchange position are accounted for as trading transactions, with fair value movements recognized directly in net income.


The portfolio of currency derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting comprises currency forwards and currency options with a maturity of less than two years:


Notional

As of December 31, 2006

(€ million)

Total

USD

GBP

AUD

CAD

CHF

CZK

PLN

NOK

SEK

Other

Forward purchases

37.0

23.5

-

0.7

-

-

-

-

-

4.2

8.6

Forward sales

51.7

19.4

-

10.2

-

-

-

-

4.2

-

17.9

Total currency forwards

88.7

42.9

-

10.9

-

-

-

-

4.2

4.2

26.5

Currency receiver swaps

145.3

-

-

2.8

-

4.9

135.7

-

1.0

0.9

 

Currency payer swaps

2,460.0

730.4

1,092.5

147.8

25.7

33.1

3.5

87.4

132.3

98.2

109.1

Total currency swaps

2,605.3

730.4

1,092.5

150.6

25.7

38.0

139.2

87.4

133.3

99.2

109.1

Put options

10.6

10.6

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total currency options

10.6

10.6

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-



Notional

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

 

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

(€ million)

Total

USD

GBP

PLN

NOK

SEK

Other

 

Total

USD

GBP

PLN

NOK

SEK

Other

Forward purchases

39.7

15.9

13.1

-

-

-

10.7

 

54.9

25.6

24.2

-

-

-

5.1

Forward sales

48.8

34.9

1.8

-

-

-

12.1

 

24.1

5.1

14.9

-

-

-

4.1

Total currency forwards

88.5

50.8

14.9

-

-

-

22.8

 

79.0

30.7

39.1

-

-

-

9.2

Currency receiver swaps

98.7

12.1

0.6

1.3

0.8

1.1

82.8

 

114.0

9.6

21.9

-

-

1.4

81.1

Currency payer swaps

1,428.1

317.9

602.1

168.4

46.8

91.3

201.6

 

1,529.2

587.0

430.2

134.6

118.0

98.2

161.2

Total currency swaps

1,526.8

330.0

602.7

169.7

47.6

92.4

284.4

 

1,643.2

596.6

452.1

134.6

118.0

99.6

242.3

Call options

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

 

3.2

3.2

-

-

-

-

-

Put options

3.6

3.6

-

-

-

-

-

 

4.0

4.0

-

-

-

-

-

Total currency options

3.6

3.6

-

-

-

-

-

 

7.2

7.2

-

-

-

-

-





Back to contents




Fair value

As of December 31, 2006

(€ million)

Total

USD

GBP

AUD

CAD

CHF

CZK

PLN

NOK

SEK

Other

Forward purchases

(1.5)

(1.6)

       

0.1

 

Currency receiver swaps

0.7

     

0.7

    

Total currency swaps and forward purchases

(0.8)

(1.6)

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.7

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

Forward sales

0.6

0.3

        

0.3

Currency payer swaps

10.5

8.5

0.7

(1.1)

1.5

0.8

 

(0.3)

0.5

  

Total currency swaps and forward sales

11.2

8.8

0.7

(1.1)

1.5

0.8

0.0

(0.3)

0.5

0.0

0.3

Put options

-

-

         

Total currency options

-

-

         

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting (*)

10.4

7.2

0.7

(1.1)

1.5

0.8

0.7

(0.3)

0.5

0.1

0.3


Fair value

As of December 31, 2005

 

As of December 31, 2004

(€ million)

Total

USD

GBP

PLN

NOK

SEK

Other

 

Total

USD

GBP

PLN

NOK

SEK

Other

Forward purchases

(1.8)

(1.6)

-

-

-

-

(0.2)

 

(3.4)

(3.1)

-

-

-

-

(0.3)

Currency receiver swaps

(0.3)

0.4

-

-

-

-

(0.7)

 

(0.6)

(1.0)

(0.3)

-

-

-

0.7

Total currency swaps and forward purchases

(2.1)

(1.2)

-

-

-

-

(0.9)

 

(4.0)

(4.1)

(0.3)

-

-

-

0.4

Forward sales

(1.6)

(1.4)

-

-

-

-

(0.2)

 

-

0.5

(0.5)

-

-

-

-

Currency payer swaps

(5.4)

(5.3)

1.5

-

(0.1)      

(0.1)

(1.4)     

 

4.3

2.0

1.5

(3.3)

2.0

0.7

1.4

Total currency swaps and forward sales

(7.0)

(6.7)

1.5

-

(0.1)      

(0.1)

(1.6)     

 

4.3

2.5

1.0

(3.3)

2.0

0.7

1.4

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting (*)

(9.1)

(7.9)

1.5

-

(0.1)      

(0.1)

(2.5)  ��   

 

0.3

(1.6)

0.7

(3.3)

2.0

0.7

1.8

(*) Net fair value (Assets–Liabilities) excluding embedded derivatives


The above portfolio of currency derivatives was mainly contracted by Veolia Environnement SA (holding company) to hedge its foreign currency-denominated net debt (comprising foreign currency borrowings and foreign currency-denominated inter-company loans and borrowings), to reduce the sensitivity of foreign currency-denominated debt, net of cash and cash equivalents, to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates.


The following table presents a break down of the foreign exchange exposure as of December 31, 2006 of Veolia Environnement SA’s foreign currency-denominated debt, net of cash and cash equivalents, taking into account currency derivatives:  


 

VE SA foreign currency-denominated net debt

Open position in € million*

Impact of a 10% change in exchange rates against the euro

GBP

7.8

11.6

1.1

PLN

9.5

2.5

0.2

USD

31.0

23.5

2.1

CHF

4.3

2.7

0.2

CAD

2.3

1.5

0.1

Other (€ million equivalent)

 

19.1

1.7

Total

n/a

60.9

5.5


* Accounting position


The above table shows that a 10% increase in all foreign currencies against the euro would generate foreign exchange gains of €5.5 million.




Back to contents




Exposure to Commodity Risk

Fuel and electricity risks

Fuel prices can be subject to significant fluctuations. Nonetheless, our activities have not been materially affected and should not be materially affected in the future by the cost or availability of fuel or other commodities, as the contracts entered into by us generally include price review and/or indexation clauses which enable it to pass on the majority of any increases in commodity or fuel prices to the price of services sold to customers, even if this may be performed with a time delay.

As of December 31, 2006, the fair value of related derivative instruments totaled €64.2 million in assets and €25.8 million in liabilities and did not qualify for hedge accounting. Transactions mainly concern options to purchase electricity held by the company carrying the Braunschweig contract and covering the period 2007 to 2025 of €55.8 million, based on period-end valuation assumptions and commitments to sell electricity covering the period 2007 to 2011 of €23.8 million, based on the same valuation assumptions.  

Contract notional amounts are as follows:


(€ million)

Notional contract amount by maturity

Total

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Electricity purchase options

in Gwh

16,511

886

3,501

12,124

 

in € million

717.0

37.5

150.3

529.2

Electricity sale commitments

in Gwh

3,811

876

2,935

 
 

in € million

184.4

39.3

145.1

 


Greenhouse gas emission rights

Other transactions not qualifying for hedge accounting relate to contracts swapping greenhouse gas emission rights for Carbon Emission certificates, maturing at the end of 2007, for 2 million metric tons. These swaps are recorded in balance sheet assets for a net carrying amount of €7.2 million.


Exposure to Equity Risk

As of December 31, 2006, we held 15,254,308 of our own shares with a market value of €890.9 million and a net carrying amount of €479.7 million deducted from equity.  

As part of its cash management strategy, we hold UCITS shares. These UCITS have the characteristics of monetary UCITS and are not subject to equity risk.


ITEM 12.

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

Not Applicable.

ITEM 12D.

AMERICAN DEPOSITARY SHARES

Our ordinary shares trade in the United States under a sponsored ADR facility with The Bank of New York Mellon as depositary.

Fees Payable by ADS Holders

The Bank of New York Mellon, as the Company’s Depositary (the “Depositary”), collects its fees for delivery and surrender of ADSs directly from investors depositing shares or surrendering ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal or from intermediaries acting for them. The Depositary collects fees for making distributions to investors by deducting those fees from the amounts distributed or by selling a portion of distributable property to pay the fees. The Depositary may generally refuse to provide fee-attracting services until fees for those services are paid.

The following table summarizes various fees currently charged by the Depositary:

Fees:

For:

$5.00 (or less) per 100 ADSs (or portion of 100 ADSs

-

Issuance of ADSs, including issuances resulting from a distribution of shares or rights or other property,

Cancellation of ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal, including if the deposit agreement terminates. 

$0.02 (or less) per ADS

-

Any cash distribution to ADS registered holders. 

A fee equivalent to the fee that would be payable if securities distributed to you had been shares and the shares had been deposited to issuance of ADSs

-

Distribution of securities distributed to holders of deposited securities which are distributed by the Depositary to ADS registered holders. 

Registration or transfer fees

-

Transfer and registration of shares on our share register to or from the name of the Depositary or its agent when you deposit or withdraw shares 

Expenses of the Depositary

-

Cable, telex and facsimile transmissions

-

Converting foreign currency to U.S. dollars 

Taxes and other governmental charges the Depositary or the custodian have to pay on any ADS or share underlying an ADS, for example, stock transfer taxes, stamp duty or withholding taxes 

As necessary 

Any charges incurred by the Depositary or its agents for servicing the deposited securities 

-

As necessary




197




Back to contentsContents


Fees Payable to the Company by the Depositary

From January 1, 2009 to April 16, 2010, no amounts were reimbursed by the Depositary to the Company.

The Depositary has agreed to reimburse the Company for expenses it incurs that are related to establishment and maintenance expenses of the ADS program. The Depositary has agreed to reimburse the Company for its continuing annual stock exchange listing fees. The Depositary has also agreed to pay the standard out-of-pocket maintenance costs for the ADRs, which consists of the expenses of postage and envelopes for mailing annual and interim financial reports, printing and distributing dividend checks, electronic filing of U.S. Federal tax information, mailing required tax forms, stationery, postage, facsimile and telephone calls. It has also agreed to reimburse the Company annually for certain investor relationship programs or special investor relations promotional activities. In certain instances, the Depositary has agreed to provide additional payments to the Company based on any ap plicable performance indicators relating to the ADR facility. There are limits on the amount of expenses for which the Depositary will reimburse the Company, but the amount of reimbursement available to the Company is not necessarily tied to the amount of fees the Depositary collects from investors.

The Depositary collects its fees for delivery and surrender of ADSs directly from investors depositing shares or surrendering ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal, or from intermediaries acting for them. The Depositary collects fees for making distributions to investors by deducting those fees from the amounts distributed or by selling a portion of distributable property to pay the fees. The Depositary may collect its annual fee for depositary services by deduction from cash distributions or by directly billing investors or by charging the book-entry system accounts of participants acting for them. The Depositary may generally refuse to provide fee-attracting services until its fees for those services are paid.




198



Back to Contents


PART II

ITEM 13.

DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES

None.

ITEM 14.

MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 15.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures


We carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the chief executive officerChief Executive Officer and chief financial officer,Chief Finance Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2006.2009. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon our evaluation, the chief executive officerChief Executive Officer and chief financial officerChief Finance Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 20062009 were effective to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reportsre ports that it fileswe file under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) is recor ded,recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act, of 1934, as amended, is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officerChief Executive Officer and chief financial officer,Chief Finance Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.


Internal Controls


Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting:


Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13 a—15 (f)13A-15(f). Management assessed the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20062009 based on the framework in “Internal Control — Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.


Based on that assessment, management has concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 20062009 to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of its financial reporting and the preparation of its financial statements for external purposes:


-

In conformitypurposes, in compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adoptedissued by the European UnionInternational Accounting Standards Board and

-

As it pertains to the information relating to the nature and effect of differences between those International Financial Reporting Standards with IFRS as adopted by the European Union and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, as detailed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.


Union.

Due to its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements, and can only provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


Management’s assessment of theThe effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting has been audited by Salustro ReydelKPMG SA and Ernst & Young et Autres, independent registered public accounting firms, as stated in their report on management’s assessment of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006,2009, which is included herein.


For an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firms, see the report of Salustro Reydel and Ernst & Young et Autres, independent registered public accounting firms, included under “Item 18. Financial Statements” on page F-2.


There were no changes to our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Form 20-FAnnual Report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.



199



Back to Contents


ITEM 16A.

AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

Our boardAccounts and Audit Committee has four members in accordance with the requirements of directors has determined thatthe Board of Directors’charter: Daniel Bouton (Chairman), Pierre-André de Chalendar, Jean-Marc Espalioux and Paul-Louis Girardot. Messrs. Jean-Marc Espalioux*,Espalioux, and Paul-Louis Girardot, and Murray Stuart* qualify as “audit committee financial experts” within the meaning of this Item 16A, two16A. All of whom are independent(*) based on criteria set forth in the board’s charter (and all of whomcommittee members are deemed to be independent based on criteria set forth in our Board of Directors’ charter, as well as based on the criteria of the NYSE manual).Listed Company Manual.

ITEM 16B.

CODE OF ETHICS

We have adopted a code of ethics, as defined in Item 16.B.16B. of Form 20-F under the Exchange Act. Our code of ethics applies to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer,Chief Executive Officer, Chief Finance Officer, chief accounting officer and other officers performing similar functions, as designated




Back to contents



from time to time. Our code of ethics was filed as an exhibit to our annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003, and is incorporated by reference herein. We will disclose any amendment to the provisions of such code of ethics or any waiver that our boardBoard of directorsDirectors may grant.


ITEM 16C.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Pursuant to French law, we have engaged two independent accounting firms to audit our financial statements and provide related services permissible under applicable French and U.S. laws and regulations. In respect of fiscal year 2006,2009, our independent auditors are Ernst & Young et Autres and KPMG SA, which was appointed statutory auditor in replacement of Salustro Reydel a member of KPMG International.in 2007. In accordance with French law, we consider each of these auditing firms as our principal accountants. During 2006,2009, we paidwere billed total fees of €21.7€17.9 million to KPMG and €20.1€19.3 million to Ernst & Young for the services described below. The fees set forth below billed by KPMG and Ernst & Young in 2008 and 2009 do not include fees charged to equity affiliates or proportionally consolidated entities.

Audit Fees

During 2006,2009, we paid €14.4were billed €14.8 million in fees toby KPMG and € 14.5€14.9 million toby Ernst & Young for professional audit services relating to the audit of our financial statements and other services normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. During 2005,2008, we paid €13.1were billed €14.2 million in fees toby KPMG and €13.0€16.1 million toby Ernst & Young in connection with such services.

Audit-Related Fees

During 2006,2009, we paid €7.3were billed €3.1 million in fees toby KPMG and €5.6€4.4 million toby Ernst & Young for services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the financial statements and not reported under “Audit Fees” above, including for comfort letters issued by our auditors in connection with our offerings of securities, certifications to third partiesservices not required by regulation and specific review on the IFRS implementation project.acquisition-related audits. During 2005,2008, we paid €6.6were billed € 4.0 million in fees toby KPMG and €3.9€ 5.0 million toby Ernst & Young in connection with such services.

Tax Fees

During 2006,2008 and 2009, we didwere not paybilled any fees toby KPMG or to Ernst & Young for services related to tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.  During 2005, we did not pay any fees to KPMG or toby Ernst & Young for services related to tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.

All Other Fees

During 20052008 and 2006,2009, we didwere not paybilled any fees toby KPMG or toby Ernst & Young for products and services other than the ones noted above.



200



Back to Contents


Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Our accountsAccounts and audit committeeAudit Committee is responsible, among other matters, for the oversight of our independent statutory auditors subject to the requirements of French law. Our accountsAccounts and audit committeeAudit Committee has established a list of prohibited non-audit services in order to ensure the independence of our independent statutory auditors. Our accountsAccounts and audit committeeAudit Committee has also adopted a policy and established certain procedures for the approval of audit and permissible non-audit services and for the pre-approval of audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided by our independent statutory auditors. DuringSince 2005, our accountsAccounts and audit committee establishedAudit Committee establishes an annual budget, broken down and detailed as to the type of service to be provided and the authorized amount for such service, for all permissible audit and non-audit services (including on-going non-audit engagements). Our accountsAc counts and audit committeeAudit Committee also delegated to its chair manChairman or one of its other members the responsibility for pre-approving any new permissible audit or non-audit engagements that exceeded such budgeted amounts for the particular permissible audit or non-audit service. Any engagements pre-approved by the chairmanChairman or other delegate must be reported to the full audit committee at its next succeeding meeting.


During 2006,2009, no services were provided to our companyCompany by our independent statutory auditors pursuant to the de minimis exception to the pre-approval requirement provided by paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.


ITEM 16D.

EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES

Not Applicable.




Back to contents



ITEM 16E.

PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

In 2006,2009, the following purchases of our shares were made by our company:Company:

Period

Total number of shares purchased

Average price paid per share (in euros)

Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs

Maximum amount that may be allocated to the purchase of shares under the plans or programs
(in euros)

01/01/2006 to 01/31/2006

0

n/a

0

1,000,000,000

02/01/2006 to 02/28/2006

0

n/a

0

1,000,000,000

03/01/2006 to 03/31/2006

0

n/a

0

1,000,000,000

04/01/2006 to 04/30/2006

0

n/a

0

1,000,000,000

05/01/2006 to 05/31/2006

0

n/a

0

1,500,000,000

06/01/2006 to 06/30/2006

689,000

39.08

689,000

1,500,000,000

07/01/2006 to 07/31/2006

2,000,000

40.00

2,000,000

1,500,000,000

08/01/2006 to 08/31/2006

0

n/a

0

1,500,000,000

09/01/2006 to 09/30/2006

0

n/a

0

1,500,000,000

10/01/2006 to 10/31/2006

0

n/a

0

1,500,000,000

11/01/2006 to 11/30/2006

0

n/a

0

1,500,000,000

12/01/2006 to 12/31/2006

0

n/a

0

1,500,000,000

Period

Total number
of shares
purchased

Average price
paid per share
(in euros)

Total number
of shares
purchased
as part of
publicly announced
plans or programs

Maximum amount
that may
be allocated
to the purchase
of shares
under the plans
or programs
(in euros)

01/01/2009 to 01/31/2009

0

n/a

0

1,494,547,408.61

02/01/2009 to 02/28/2009

0

n/a

0

1,494,547,408.61

03/01/2009 to 03/31/2009

0

n/a

0

1,494,547,408.61

04/01/2009 to 04/30/2009

0

n/a

0

1,494,547,408.61

05/01/2009 to 05/31/2009

0

n/a

0

1,000,000,000

06/01/2009 to 06/30/2009

0

n/a

0

1,000,000,000

07/01/2009 to 07/31/2009

0

n/a

0

1,000,000,000

08/01/2009 to 08/31/2009

0

n/a

0

1,000,000,000

09/01/2009 to 09/30/2009

0

n/a

0

1,000,000,000

10/01/2009 to 10/31/2009

0

n/a

0

1,000,000,000

11/01/2009 to 11/30/2009

0

n/a

0

1,000,000,000

12/01/2009 to 12/31/2009

0

n/a

0

1,000,000,000


At the general shareholders’ meeting held on May 12, 2005,7, 2009, our shareholders approved a share repurchase program that authorized us to purchase, sell and transfer our shares at any time, except during a public offer, as permitted under applicable laws and by any means, on the market or over-the counter, including through block trades, issuance of convertible securities and combinations of financial derivative instruments granting rights to our shares by means of conversion, exchange, reimbursement, exercise of warrants or other instruments, in an amount of up to 10% of our share capital.  Pursuant to French law, we may not hold more than 10% of our share capital at any time.  The maximum repurchase price under this program was fixed by shareholders at €37 per share and the maximum amount that may be allocated to the share repurchase program was set at €1 billion.  This program expired on May 11, 2006, when it was replaced by a new program authori zed by our shareholders as described below.

At the general shareholders’ meeting held on May 11, 2006, our shareholders approved a share repurchase program that authorized us to purchase, sell and transfer its shares at any timeregulations, and by any means, on the market or over-the-counter, including through block trades, public offers to purchase, sell or exchange, or through the use of derivative financial instruments traded on a market or over-the-counter, or through the delivery of shares following the issuance by us of convertible securities and combinations of financial derivative instruments granting rights to our sharescapital by means of conversion, exchange, reimbursement,redemption, exercise of warrants or in any other instruments, inway, either directly or indirectly via the intermediary of an investment services provider. The share repurchase may be for an amount of up to 10% of our share capital. In addition,capital, provided that we may not hold more than 10%1 0% of our share capital at any time.



201



Back to Contents


This authorization allows us to trade in our own securities with the following objectives: (i) implementing stock option plans, (ii) awarding free shares, (iii) awarding or selling shares to employees in respect of their association with the benefits of our expansion and the implementation of any company savings plan, (iv) delivering shares when rights are exercised that are attached to securities that grant access to the capital via redemption, conversion, exchange, presentation of a warrant or in any other manner, (v) delivering shares in connection with external growth transactions, mergers, spin-offs or contributions; (vi) stimulating the secondary market for or the liquidity of our shares through an investment services provider, within the scope of a liquidity contract that complies with the ethics charter recognized by the AMF, or, lastly, (vii) canceling all or part of the sh ares thus repurchased.

The maximum repurchase price under the program was fixedset by shareholders at €60the May 7, 2009 meeting at €50 per share and the maximum amount that we may allocate to the share repurchase program was set at €1.5€1 billion. This program expired on May 10, 2007, when it was replaced by a new program authorized by our shareholders, as described in “itemSee “Item 10. Additional Information—Trading in Our Own Shares.”

The shareholders’ authorization for this 20072009 share repurchase program is due to expire at the latest on November 10, 2008,7, 2010, which is 18 months after the date of the shareholders’ meeting that approved the program, unless superseded by a new program that may be adopted at our general shareholders’ meeting of May 7, 2010.


ITEM 16F.

CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT

N/A

ITEM 16G.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


STATEMENT ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 303A.11 OF THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE’S LISTED COMPANY MANUAL

Set forth below is a brief summary of the principal ways in which our corporate governance practices differ from the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) corporate governance rules applicable to U.S. domestic companies listed on the NYSE.

Our Company is incorporated under the laws of France and the principal trading market for our shares is Euronext Paris. Our ADSs are listed on the NYSE and trade in the form of American Depositary Receipts (ADRs), each of which represent one Veolia Environnement ordinary share.

Our corporate governance practices reflect applicable laws and regulations in France and conform to the provisions of the consolidated version of the AFEP-MEDEF Code of December 2008 (the “AFEP-MEDEF Code”), which is a code of recommended practices for governance and executive compensation that is widely used in France and which our Company has decided to qualify as its “reference code” in accordance with French law. Our practices also reflect U.S. laws and regulations, including applicable provisions of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act (see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees” for information regarding our current corporate governance structure, including the composition and responsibilities of our Committees). Many of the corporate governance rules in the NYSE Listed Company Manual (the NYSE Manual) do not apply to us as a “foreign pri vate issuer.” However, Rule 303A.11 requires foreign private issuers to describe significant differences between their corporate governance standards and the corporate governance standards applicable to U.S. domestic companies listed on the NYSE. While our management believes that our corporate governance practices are similar in many respects to those of U.S. NYSE-listed companies and provide investors with protections that are comparable in many respects to those established by the NYSE Manual, there are certain important differences which are described below.

Our Board of Directors annually evaluates the independence of its members based on criteria set forth in its internal charter, which are based on the recommendations of the AFEP-MEDEF Code. We believe that these criteria for independence are generally consistent with those of the NYSE Manual (i.e., to qualify as “independent” under our charter, a director must not have any relations with our Company, our subsidiaries or our management that could impair his objective judgment). However, the specific tests of “independence” may differ on certain points. For example, Mr. de Romanet de Beaune is independent under French standards but not under Rule 10A-3 of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended because he is Chief Executive Officer of Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations, which holds approximately 10% of our shares.



202



Back to Contents


Under French law, the Committees of our Board of Directors are advisory in nature and have no independent or delegated decision making authority. This is different than in the case of a U.S. company listed on the NYSE where, for example, the NYSE Manual requires that certain board Committees be vested with decision-making powers on certain matters (e.g. nominations or audit committees). Under French law, ultimate decision-making authority rests with the Board of Directors, and board committees are charged with examining matters within the scope of their charter and making recommendations on these matters to the Board of Directors. In addition, under French law the decision as to appointment of a company’s outside auditors belongs to the company’s shareholders and must be made by the shareholders at their annual general meeting upon recommendation of the Board of Directors. This is different than in the case of a U.S. company listed on the NYSE, where the NYSE Manual requires that this decision be made by the audit committee of the board. Finally, unlike U.S. NYSE-listed companies which are required to have only a single outside auditor, French law requires French listed companies like ours to have two statutory auditors. In this respect, the requirements and spirit of French law are consistent with the overriding goal of the NYSE Manual (i.e., the audit of a listed company’s accounts must be conducted by auditors independent from company management).

With respect to related party transactions, French law requires the Board of Directors to approve a broadly-defined range of transactions that could potentially create conflicts of interest between our Company, on the one hand, and our directors and executive officers, on the other hand. While the precise scope of this requirement and its application may differ from those applicable to U.S. NYSE-listed companies, this requirement is generally consistent with various provisions of the NYSE Manual that require disclosure and/or approval of various types of related party transactions.

Finally, as a foreign private issuer, our Company is exempt from rules imposing certain disclosure and procedural requirements for proxy solicitations under Section 14 of the Exchange Act. In addition, our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and “short-swing” profit recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules under the Exchange Act with respect to their purchases and sales of our ordinary shares and ADSs. In addition, our Company is not required to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or promptly as U.S. companies with securities registered under the Exchange Act, nor are we required to comply with Regulation FD, which restricts the selective disclosure of material information (although similar rules apply to us in France). As a result, there may be less publicly-available information concerning our Company than for 2007.U.S. NYSE-listed companies. Finally, as a foreign private issuer, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Finance Officer issue the certifications required by Sections 302 and 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act on an annual basis (with the filing of our annual report on Form 20-F), rather than on a quarterly basis as would be the case of a U.S. domestic company filing quarterly reports on a Form 10-Q.

For more information regarding our corporate governance practices, you should also refer to our articles of association (statuts), which are filed as an exhibit to this annual report. See “Item 10. Additional Information.”




203




Back to contentsContents



PART III

ITEM 17.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Not Applicable.

ITEM 18.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

INDEX TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Page

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms

F-1

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2006, 20052009, 2008 and 20042007

F-3

Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 20052009, 2008 and 20042007

F-5F-4

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 20052009, 2008 and 20042007

F-6

Consolidated Statements ofRecognized Income and Expenses Changes in Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 20052009, 2008 and 20042007

F-7

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

F-8F-11


ITEM 19.

EXHIBITS

The following exhibits are included herein:


Exhibit

Number

Description


1

Articles of Association (statuts) of Veolia Environnement (unofficial(free English translation).


8

List of Subsidiaries. Included herein in Note 5043 to our consolidated financial statements.


11

Code of Ethics (previously filed as Exhibit 11 to our annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 and incorporated by reference herein).


12.1

Certifications by Henri Proglio, Chairman andAntoine Frérot, Chief Executive Officer, and Jérôme Contamine, Senior Executive Vice President andPierre-François Riolacci, Chief FinancialFinance Officer, required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


13.1

Certifications by Henri Proglio, Chairman andAntoine Frérot, Chief Executive Officer, and Jérôme Contamine, Senior Executive Vice President andPierre-François Riolacci, Chief FinancialFinance Officer, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


15.2

99.1

ReportConsent of the Chairman of the Board of Directors for 2006 as required by Art. 117 of the French Financial Security Law (Loi de Sécurité Financière) (English Translation)Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms.





204



Back to contentsContents



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS


Year ended December 31, 2006


2009

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders

of Veolia Environnement, S.A.


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsstatements of financial position of Veolia Environnement and subsidiaries (together “the Company”(hereafter the “Company”) as of December 31, 2006, 20052009, 2008 and 2004,2007, and the related consolidated income statements, consolidated statements of comprehensive income, cash flows,consolidated cash-flow statements and recognized income and expensesconsolidated statements of changes in equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006.2009. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2006, 20052009, 2008 and 2004,2007, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flowsconsolidated cash-flows for each of the three years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006,2009, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union.


Union and in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as adoptedissued by the European Union vary in certain significant respects from U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Information relating to the nature and effect of such differences is presented in Note 51 to the consolidated financial statements.


International Accounting Standards Board.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006,2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria) and our report dated June 29, 2007April 19, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessmentthe effectiveness of and the effective operation of,Company’s internal control over financial reporting.


Paris la Défense and Neuilly sur Seine, France, April 19, 2010


The Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms

Paris la Défense and Neuilly sur Seine, France

June 29, 2007

KPMG AUDIT

SALUSTRO REYDEL

A member firmdivision of KPMG InternationalSA

ERNST & YOUNG et Autres

SALUSTRO REYDEL

Membre de KPMG International

BARBIER FRINAULT & AUTRES

Ernst & Young






Bernard Cattenoz     Bertrand VialatteJay Nirsimloo


Baudouin Griton


Pierre Hurstel




Jean Bouquot     Patrick GounelleNicolas Pfeuty




F-1



Back to contentsContents



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS


Year ended December 31, 2006


To the Board of Directors and Shareholders

Veolia Environnement S.A.


2009

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying report of management on internal control over financial reporting disclosed in Item 15, that Veolia Environnement and subsidiaries (the “Company”) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006,2009 of Veolia Environnement S.A. and subsidiaries (hereafter the “Company”), based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the(hereafter “the COSO criteria)criteria”). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying report of management on internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.


We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment,assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control andbased on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.


A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurancea ssurance regarding prevention or timely detection of una uthorizedunauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006,2009, based on the COSO criteria.


We also have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheetsstatements of financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2006, 2005, 2004,2009, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated income statements, consolidated statements of comprehensive income, cash flowsconsolidated cash-flow statements and recognized income and expensesconsolidated statements of changes in equity for each of the three years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006,2009, and our report dated June 29, 2007,April 19, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.


Paris la Défense and Neuilly sur Seine, France, April 19, 2010

The Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms

Paris La Défense and Neuilly-sur-Seine,KPMG AUDIT
A division of KPMG SA

June 29, 2007ERNST & YOUNG et Autres

  

Salustro ReydelJay Nirsimloo

Ernst & Young et Autres

Member of KPMG International

Bernard Cattenoz        Bertrand VialatteBaudouin Griton

     Jean Bouquot                          Patrick Gounelle                        Pierre Hurstel

Nicolas Pfeuty



F-2






Back to contentsContents




CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

OF VEOLIA ENVIRONNEMENT
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET – ASSETSSTATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION - ASSETS

Notes

As of December 31,

(€ million)

 

2009

2008

2007

Goodwill

4

 6,624.6

 6,723.3

 6,913.2

Concession intangible assets

5

 3,624.8

 3,637.7

 2,989.2

Other intangible assets

6

 1,437.8

 1,535.2

 1,706.4

Property, plant and equipment

7

 9,382.4

 9,427.1

 9,203.2

Investments in associates

8

 268.5

 311.6

 292.1

Non-consolidated investments

9

 174.6

 202.8

 256.1

Non-current operating financial assets

10

 5,275.2

 5,298.9

 5,272.4

Non-current derivative instruments - Assets

28

 431.9

 508.4

 123.7

Other non-current financial assets

11

 753.9

 817.3

 746.0

Deferred tax assets

12

 1,621.3

 1,579.5

 1,468.1

Non-current assets

 

 29,595.0

 30,041.8

 28,970.4

Inventories and work-in-progress

13

 997.3

1,022.0

 839.4

Operating receivables

13

 12,247.5

13,093.2

 12,459.4

Current operating financial assets

10

 376.6

452.3

 355.2

Other current financial assets

11

 217.7

321.4

 330.0

Current derivative instruments - Assets

28

 45.6

142.8

 114.4

Cash and cash equivalents

14

 5,614.4

3,849.6

 3,115.6

Assets classified as held for sale

24

 722.6

203.0

 122.5

Current assets

 

 20,221.7

 19,084.3

 17,336.5

Total assets

 

 49,816.7

 49,126.1

 46,306.9


(€ million)

Notes

As of December 31,

  

2006

2005 adjusted

2004 adjusted

Goodwill

4

5,705.0

4,752.3

4,246.8

Concession intangible assets

5

2,345.6

2,091.8

1,610.0

Other intangible assets

6

1,379.8

1,281.4

1,192.5

Publicly-owned utility networks

 

-

-

-

Property, plant and equipment

7

7,918.7

6,885.7

6,173.4

Investments in associates

8

241.0

201.5

219.2

Non-consolidated investments

9

181.7

209.5

181.1

Long-term IFRIC4 loans

 

-

-

-

Non-current operating financial assets

10

5,133.4

5,337.4

4,947.0

Derivative instruments - Assets

32

201.6

249.0

424.8

Other non-current financial assets

11

637.5

691.6

606.7

Deferred tax assets

12

1,355.7

1,134.7

1,131.8

Non-current assets

 

25,100.0

22,834.9

20,733.3

Inventories and work-in-progress

13

731.8

635.2

560.3

Operating receivables

13

10,968.7

10,083.3

9,233.9

Short-term IFRIC4 loans

 

-

-

-

Current operating financial assets

10

326.2

208.0

158.9

Other short-term loans

14

205.3

221.2

333.0

Marketable securities

15

66.4

60.7

189.3

Cash and cash equivalents

16

2,658.0

2,336.1

4,660.3

Current assets

 

14,956.4

13,544.5

15,135.7

Non-current assets held for sale

 

67.3

1.6

30.3

Total assets

 

40,123.7

36,381.0

35,899.3




Back to contents

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION - EQUITY AND LIABILITIES

Notes

As of December 31,

(€ million)

 

2009

2008

2007

Share capital

 

 2,468.2

 2,362.9

 2,358.8

Additional paid-in capital

 

 9,433.2

 9,197.5

 9,179.5

Reserves and retained earnings attributable to owners of the Company

 

 (4,440.8)

 (4,559.2)

 (3,925.4)

Total equity attributable to owners of the Company

15

 7,460.6

 7,001.2

 7,612.9

Total equity attributable to non-controlling interests

 

 2,670.1

 2,530.5

 2,577.8

Equity

15

 10,130.7

 9,531.7

 10,190.7

Non-current provisions

16

 2,291.1

 2,160.2

 2,138.9

Non-current borrowings

17

 17,647.3

 17,063.9

 13,948.0

Non-current derivative instruments – Liabilities

28

 139.3

 159.9

 163.8

Deferred tax liabilities

12

 1,951.2

 1,936.0

 1,794.7

Non-current liabilities

 

 22,028.9

 21,320.0

 18,045.4

Operating payables

13

 13,075.7

 13,591.8

 12,944.8

Current provisions

16

 749.2

 773.1

 825.7

Current borrowings

17

 2,983.1

 3,219.7

 3,805.0

Current derivative instruments - Liabilities

28

 84.8

 125.9

 34.0

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

14

 454.9

 465.7

 459.4

Liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale

24

 309.4

 98.2

 1.9

Current liabilities

 

 17,657.1

 18,274.4

 18,070.8

Total equity and liabilities

 

 49,816.7

 49,126.1

 46,306.9



CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET – EQUITY AND LIABILITIES


(€ millions)

Notes

As of December 31,

  

2006

2005 adjusted

2004 adjusted

     

Share capital

 

2,063.1

2,039.4

2,032.1

Additional paid-in capital

 

6,641.2

6,499.1

6,467.6

Reserves and retained earnings attributable to equity holders of the parent

 

(4,343.5)

(4,748.3)

(5,288.5)

Minority interests

 

2,192.6

1,888.0

1,728.7

Equity

17

6,553.4

5,678.2

4,939.9

Non-current provisions

18

2,196.6

1,648.0

1,308.6

Long-term borrowings

19

14,001.6

13,722.8

12,157.0

Derivative instruments - Liabilities

32

145.9

154.5

189.8

Other non-current liabilities

20

207.3

203.7

159.7

Deferred tax liabilities

12

1,504.9

1,205.0

1,021.3

Non-current liabilities

 

18,056.3

16,934.0

14,836.4

Operating payables

13

11,268.6

10,369.8

9,572.2

Current provisions

18

825.9

754.0

700.1

Short-term borrowings

21

2,904.1

2,138.2

5,426.1

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

22

456.0

506.8

420.1

Current liabilities

 

15,454.6

13,768.8

16,118.5

Non-current liabilities held for sale

 

59.4

-

4.5

Total equity and liabilities

 

40,123.7

36,381.0

35,899.3

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



F-3





Back to contentsContents



CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT


(€ millions)

Notes

For the year ended December 31,

  

2006

2005 adjusted

2004 adjusted

Revenue

23

28,620.4

25,570.4

22,792.4

o/w Revenue from operating financial assets

 

351.0

325.8

275.6

Cost of sales

 

(23,427.1)

(20,869.9)

(18,604.8)

Selling costs

 

(515.2)

(478.5)

(439.7)

General and administrative expenses

 

(2,611.2)

(2,394.9)

(2,227.0)

Other operating revenue and expenses

 

66.0

65.8

(31.3)

Operating income

24

2,132.9

1,892.9

1,489.6

Finance costs

25

(783.8)

(774.0)

(832.9)

Finance income

25

82.8

63.3

91.8

Other financial income and expenses

26

(34.0)

28.1

44.4

Income tax expense

27

(409.6)

(422.4)

(174.9)

Share of net income of associates

8 & 28

6.0

6.5

22.0

Net income (expense) from continuing operations

 

994.3

794.4

640.0

Net income from discontinued operations

29

0.6

0.7

(38.1)

Net income (expense) for the year

 

994.9

795.1

601.9

Minority interests

30

236.2

172.9

212.1

Attributable to equity holders of the parent

 

758.7

622.2

389.8

(in euros)

    

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent per share

31

   

Diluted

 

1.91

1.59

0.98

Basic

 

1.93

1.59

0.98

Net income from continuing operations attributable to equity holders of the parent per share

31

   

Diluted

 

1.91

1.58

1.47

Basic

 

1.93

1.59

1.47


(€ million)

Notes

Year ended December 31,

  

2009

2008(2)

2007(2)

Revenue

18

34,551.0

35,764.8

31,574.1

o/w Revenue from operating financial assets

 

394.4

397.9

342.1

Cost of sales

 

(28,786.2)

(30,013.4)

(25,710.4)(1)

Selling costs

 

(602.6)

(621.4)

(560.4)(1)

General and administrative expenses

 

(3,338.1)

(3,218.6)

(2,905.8)(1)

Other operating revenue and expenses

 

196.0

49.4

63.6

Operating income

19

2,020.1

1,960.8

2,461.1

Finance costs

20

(880.4)

(1,111.2)

(958.0)

Finance income

20

96.1

202.2

151.1

Other financial income and expenses

21

(110.3)

(39.2)

2.3

Income tax expense

22

(242.2)

(462.0)

(399.7)

Share of net income of associates

8 & 23

1.4

19.4

17.1

Net income from continuing operations

 

884.7

570.0

1,273.9

Net income from discontinued operations

24

(42.8)

139.2

(19.1)

Net income for the year

 

841.9

709.2

1,254.8

Non-controlling interests

25

257.8

304.1

326.9

Attributable to owners of the Company

 

584.1

405.1

927.9

     

(in euros)

    

Net income attributable to owners of the Company per share(3)

26

   

Diluted

 

1.24

0.87

2.11

Basic

 

1.24

0.88

2.13

Net income from continuing operations attributable to owners of the Company per share(3)

26

   

Diluted

 

1.33

0.71

2.17

Basic

 

1.33

0.71

2.19


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

(1)In 2008, as part of ongoing efficiency measures, the Group reclassified certain expenses from cost of sales to selling costs and general and administrative expenses. These reclassifications had no impact on operating income (see Note 19 Operating income).

(2)In accordance with IFRS 5,Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations, the results of operations of:

the Clemessy and Crystal entities in the Energy Services Division, divested in December 2008;

the entities of the U.S. waste-to-energy activity in Environmental Services (Montenay International) and Freight activities (essentially in France, Germany and the Netherlands) divested in the second half of 2009;

Transportation activities in the United Kingdom and renewable energy activities in the process of divestiture at the year end are presented in a separate line, “Net income from discontinued operations,” for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.

(3)Pursuant to IAS 33, the weighted average number of shares outstanding taken into account for the calculation of 2008 and 2007 net income per share was adjusted following the distribution of a scrip dividend in June 2009. The adjusted number of earning per share is therefore 462.2 million as of December 31, 2008 and 434.8 million as of December 31, 2007 (see Note 26).

In 2009, the weighted average number of shares is 471.7 million (diluted and basic).



F-4



Back to contentsContents



CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT


 (€ millions)

Notes

For the year ended December 31,

  

2006

2005 adjusted

2004 adjusted

Net income for the year attributable to equity holders of the parent

 

758.7

622.2

389.8

Net income for the year attributable to equity holders of the parent

 

758.7

622.2

389.8

Minority interests

30

236.2

172.9

212.3

Operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses

24

1,831.0

1,690.7

1,917.8

Financial amortization and impairment losses

26

9.4

(21.0)

(38.2)

Gains (losses) on disposal and dilution

 

(73.3)

(70.0)

(161.3)

Share of net income of associates

8 & 28

(6.0)

(14.9)

(24.2)

Dividends received

26

(9.7)

(6.5)

(6.0)

Finance costs and finance income

25

701.0

712.4

742.8

Income tax expense

27 & 29

357.1

422.4

303.9

Other

 

40.0

33.7

(0.7)

Operating cash flow before changes in working capital

 

3,844.4

3,541.9

3,336.2

Changes in working capital

13

(111.8)

(39.4)

286.1

Income taxes paid

 

(343.0)

(338.8)

(238.0)

Net cash flow from operating activities

 

3,389.6

3,163.7

3,384.3

Purchases of intangible, property, plant and equipment

 

(2,017.6)

(1,837.1)

(1,723.0)

Proceeds on disposal of intangible, property, plant and equipment

 

141.3

168.8

321.8

Purchases of investments

 

(1,291.5)

(944.1)

(332.5)

Proceeds on disposal of investments

 

206.7

154.0

2,184.2

Operating financial assets:

10

   

New operating financial assets

 

(360.6)

(513.4)

(428.5)

Principal payments on operating financial assets

 

438.1

320.6

275.7

Dividends received

8 & 26

13.8

16.8

23.5

New long-term loans granted

11

(69.4)

(62.1)

(132.5)

Principal payments on long-term loans

11

29.2

55.7

131.4

Net decrease in short-term loans

14

2.6

115.0

41.1

Sales and purchases of marketable securities

15

3.4

118.2

(42.3)

Net cash from (used in) investing activities

 

(2,904.0)

(2,407.6)

318.9

Net increase/(decrease) in short-term borrowings

21

(239.2)

(2,936.2)

1,789.2

New long-term borrowings and other debt

19 & 20

1,997.2

3,134.8

930.5

Principal payments on long-term borrowings and other debt

19 & 20

(1,000.8)

(2,319.6)

(3,468.7)

Proceeds on issue of shares

 

246.5

81.0

167.2

Purchase of treasury shares

 

0.4

-

(183.2)

Dividends paid

 

(479.2)

(374.0)

(389.6)

Interest paid

 

(596.4)

(738.8)

(640.9)

Net cash used in financing activities

 

(71.5)

(3,152.8)

(1,795.5)

Net cash at the beginning of the year

 

1,829.3

4,240.2

2,320.6

Effect of foreign exchange rate changes

 

(41.4)

(14.2)

11.9

Net cash at the end of the year

 

2,202.0

1,829.3

4,240.2

Cash and cash equivalents

16

2,658.0

2,336.1

4,660.3

- Bank overdrafts and other cash position item

22

456.0

506.8

420.1

Net cash at the end of the year

 

2,202.0

1,829.3

4,240.2


Discontinued operations within the meaning of IFRS 5 contributed - €10.0 million, €8.9 million and €234.0 million to net cash from operating activities, €12.2 million, €5.4 million and €2,159.0 million to net cash from investing activities and €10.3 million, -€4.4 million and - €9.6 million to net cash from financing activities in 2006, 2005 adjusted and 2004 adjusted respectively.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.




Back to contents



STATEMENT OF RECOGNIZEDCOMPREHENSIVE INCOME AND EXPENSES


(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31,2005 adjusted

Year ended December 31,2004 adjusted

Net income for the year

994.9

795.1

523.1

Actuarial gains or losses on pension obligations

25.6

(144.7)

-

Fair value adjustments on available-for-sale assets

(2.3)

(2.4)

(25.7)

Fair value adjustments on cash flow hedge derivative instruments

37.0

13.7

1.9

Foreign exchange gains and losses:

   

on translation of the financial statements of subsidiaries drawn up in a foreign currency

(92.3)

331.8

(40.0)

on the net financing of foreign investments

(7.8)

(13.8)

(21.2)

Income and expenses recognized directly in equity

(39.8)

184.7

(85.0)

Total income and expenses recognized

955.1

979.8

438.1

Attributable to equity holders of the parent

712.2

783.8

303.8

Attributable to minority interests

242.9

195.9

134.3

Effect of change in accounting policies on retained earning as of January 1, (IAS1.96(d))

(15.3)

(8.4)

(4.6)

(€ million)

 Year ended December 31,

 

2009

2008

2007

    

Net income for the year

841.9

709.2

1,254.8

    

Actuarial gains or losses on pension obligations

(67.8)

(138.1)

114.4

Related income tax expense

14.3

34.1

(26.4)

Amount net of tax

(53.5)

(104.0)

88.0

    

Fair value adjustments on available-for-sale assets

(3.3)

(18.2)

33.8

Related income tax expense

(0.6)

(0.2)

(0.1)

Amount net of tax

(3.9)

(18.4)

33.7

    

Fair value adjustments on cash flow hedge derivatives

46.2

(112.8)

15.5

Related income tax expense

(5.8)

24.2

(6.7)

Amount net of tax

40.4

(88.6)

8.8

    

Foreign exchange gains and losses:

   

- on the translation of the financial statements of subsidiaries drawn up in a foreign currency

65.2

(279.8)

(251.5)

Amount net of tax

65.2

(279.8)

(251.5)

- on the net financing of foreign operations

2.2

(31.8)

(6.5)

- related income tax expense

3.8

15.9

1.0

Amount net of tax

6.0

(15.9)

(5.5)

    

Other comprehensive income

54.2

(506.7)

(126.5)

Total comprehensive income for the year

896.1

202.5

1,128.3

 - Attributable to owners of the Company

657.1

(84.4)

778.5

 - Attributable to non-controlling interests

239.0

286.9

349.8


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



F-5





Back to contentsContents


CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT

(€ million)

Notes

Year ended December 31,

  

2009

2008

2007

Net income for the year attributable to owners of the Company

 

584.1

405.1

927.9

Net income for the year attributable to non-controlling interests

25

257.8

304.1

326.9

Operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses

19

2,230.4

2,301.6

1,816.7

Financial amortization and impairment losses

 

7.2

19.5

8.0

Gains/(losses) on disposal and dilution

19

(306.1)

(288.2)

(173.5)

Share of net income of associates

8

0.9

(18.5)

(16.9)

Dividends received

21

(8.7)

(8.4)

(8.8)

Finance costs and finance income

20

792

922.8

817.1

Income tax expense

22

311.9

470.9

420.1

Other items (including IFRS 2)

 

69.1

69.5

101.9

Operating cash flow before changes in working capital

 

3,938.6

4,178.4

4,219.4

Changes in working capital

13

432.1

(80.9)

(167.1)

Income taxes paid

 

(408.5)

(347.5)

(417.7)

Net cash from operating activities

 

3,962.2

3,750.0

3,634.6

Capital expenditure

41

(2,465.7)

(2,780.6)

(2,518.7)

Proceeds on disposal of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment

 

258.7

329.8

212.9

Purchases of investments

 

(187.0)

(800.7)

(1,835.4)

Proceeds on disposal of financial assets

 

582.3

361.1

181.7

Operating financial assets:

    

New operating financial assets

10

(483.1)

(507.0)

(404.1)

Principal payments on operating financial assets

10

455.2

358.2

360.7

Dividends received

8 & 21

14.8

15.8

15.3

New non-current loans granted

 

(43.8)

(252.7)

(65.0)

Principal payments on non-current loans

 

65.8

30.0

61.6

Net decrease/(increase) in current loans

 

140.9

(89.0)

(27.4)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(1,661.9)

(3,335.1)

(4,018.4)

Net increase/(decrease) in current borrowings

17

(1,323.9)

(1437.0)

(1,534.5)

New non-current borrowings and other debt

17

3,301.2

3,590.2

2,060.4

Principal payments on non-current borrowings and other debt

17

(1,514.8)

(184.8)

(1,362.9)

Proceeds on issue of shares

 

157.1

51.0

3,039.2

Share capital reduction

15

 

(131.0)

-

(Purchases of)/proceeds from treasury shares(1)

 

4.9

3.2

18.9

Dividends paid(1)

 

(434.0)

(754.4)

(564.3)

Interest paid

 

(729.8)

(847.6)

(716.0)

Net cash from/(used in) financing activities

 

(539.3)

289.6

940.8

Net cash at the beginning of the year

 

3,383.9

2,656.2

2,202.0

Effect of foreign exchange rate changes and other

 

14.6

23.2

(102.8)

Net cash at the end of the year

 

5,159.5

3,383.9

2,656.2

Cash and cash equivalents

14

5,614.4

3,849.6

3,115.6

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

14

454.9

465.7

459.4

Net cash at the end of the year

 

5,159.5

3,383.9

2,656.2


(1)

 See the Statement of Changes in Equity



Net cash flows attributable to discontinued operations as defined in IFRS 5 contributed -€31.1 million, +€37.8 million and +€55.1 million to net cash from operating activities, +€266.6 million, +€148.4 million and -€94.1 million to net cash from investing activities and -€5.7 million, -€26.3 million and -€26.9 million to net cash from financing activities in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Discontinued operations are presented in Note 24.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



F-6



Back to Contents


STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

(€ million)

Number
of shares
outstanding

Share
Capital

Additional
paid-in
capital

Treasury
shares

Consolidated
reserves
and retained
earnings

Foreign
exchange
translation
reserves

Fair
value
reserves

Equity
attributable
to owners of
the Company

Non-
controlling
interests

Total
equity

As of January 1,
2007

412,626,550

2,063.1

6,641.2

(479.6)

(3,986.7)

144.6

(21.8)

4,360.8

2,192.6

6,553.4

Issues of share capital of the parent company

59,136,206

295.7

2,538.3

-

33.8

-

-

2,867.8

-

2,867.8

Elimination of treasury shares

 

-

-

18.9

(0.3)

-

-

18.6

-

18.6

Share purchase and subscription options

 

-

-

-

15.6

-

-

15.6

-

15.6

Third party share in share capital increases of subsidiaries and changes in consolidation scope

 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

178.5

178.5

Parent company dividend distribution

 

-

-

-

(419.7)

-

-

(419.7)

-

(419.7)

Third party share in dividend distributions of subsidiaries

 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(144.6)

(144.6)

Foreign exchange translation

 

-

-

-

-

(264.3)

-

(264.3)

15.4

(248.9)

Fair value adjustments

 

-

-

-

-

(8.1)

47.1

39.0

(0.8)

38.2

Actuarial gains or losses on pension obligations

 

-

-

-

79.5

-

-

79.5

8.5

88.0

Net income for the year

 

-

-

-

927.9

-

-

927.9

326.9

1,254.8

Other changes

 

-

-

-

(17.3)

8.7

(3.7)

(12.3)

1.3

(11.0)

As of December 31, 2007

471,762,756

2,358.8

9,179.5

(460.7)

(3,367.2)

(119.1)

21.6

7,612.9

2,577.8

10,190.7




F-7



Back to Contents



(€ million)

Number
of shares
outstanding

Share
Capital

Additional
paid-in
capital

Treasury
shares

Consolidated
reserves
and retained
earnings

Foreign
exchange
translation
reserves

Fair
value
reserves

Equity
attributable
to owners of the Company

Non-
controlling
interests

Total
equity

As of December 31, 2007

471,762,756

2,358.8

9,179.5

(460.7)

(3,367.2)

(119.1)

21.6

7,612.9

2,577.8

10,190.7

Issues of share capital of the parent company

813,910

4.1

17.9

    

22.0

-

22.0

Elimination of treasury shares

   

3.2

2.3

  

5.5

-

5.5

Share purchase and subscription options

    

5.5

  

5.5

 

5.5

Third party share in share capital increases of subsidiaries and changes in consolidation scope

        

(129.0)

(129.0)

Parent company dividend distribution

    

(553.5)

  

(553.5)

 

(553.5)

Third party share in dividend distributions of subsidiaries

        

(200.8)

(200.8)

Foreign exchange translation

     

(591.9)

 

(591.9)

(1.9)

(593.8)

Fair value adjustments

     

298.1

(101.6)

196.5

(10.5)

186.0

Actuarial gains or losses on pension obligations

    

(94.8)

  

(94.8)

(9.2)

(104.0)

Net income for the year

    

405.1

  

405.1

304.1

709.2

Other changes

    

13.1

(20.0)

0.8

(6.1)

 

(6.1)

As of December 31, 2008

472,576,666

2,362.9

9,197.4

(457.5)

(3,589.5)

(432.9)

(79.2)

7,001.2

2,530.5

9,531.7




F-8



Back to Contents



(€ million)

Number of
shares
outstanding

Share
Capital

Additional
paid-in
capital

Treasury
shares

Consolidated
reserves and
retained
earnings

Foreign
exchange
translation
reserves

Fair value
reserves

Equity
attributable to
owners of the Company

Non-
controlling
interests

Total
equity

As of
December 31,
2008

472,576,666

2,362.9

9,197.4

(457.5)

(3,589.5)

(432.9)

(79.2)

7,001.2

2,530.5

9,531.7

           

Issues of share capital of the parent company(1)

21,053,708

105.3

235.8

    

341.1

 

341.1

Elimination of treasury shares

   

4.9

   

4.9

 

4.9

Share purchase and subscription options

    

10.3

  

10.3

 

10.3

Third party share in share capital increases of subsidiaries

        

149.8

149.8

Third party share in changes in consolidation scope

        

(45.0)

(45.0)

Parent company dividend distribution

    

(553.8)

  

(553.8)

 

(553.8)

Third party share in dividend distributions of subsidiaries

        

(202.0)

(202.0)

Foreign exchange translation

     

82.4

 

82.4

(17.2)

65.2

Foreign investments

     

82.0

 

82.0

(0.1)

81.9

Actuarial gains or losses on pension obligations

    

(51.2)

  

(51.2)

(2.3)

(53.5)

Fair value adjustments on cash flow hedge derivatives

     

(75.9)

35.6

(40.3)

4.8

(35.5)

Fair value adjustments on available-for-sale assets

      

0.1

0.1

(4.0)

(3.9)

TOTAL other comprehensive income

    

(51.2)

88.5

35.7

73.0

(18.8)

54.2

Net income for the year

    

584.1

  

584.1

257.8

841.9

Other changes

    

(0.2)

  

(0.2)

(2.2)

(2.4)

As of December 31, 2009

493,630,374

2,468.2

9,433.2

(452.6)

(3,600.3)

(344.4)

(43.5)

7,460.6

2,670.1

10,130.7




F-9



Back to Contents


The dividend distribution per share was €1.21 in 2009 and 2008 and €1.05 in 2007.

A dividend distribution of €1.21 per share is proposed to the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of May 7, 2010.

The total dividend paid recorded in the Consolidated Cash Flow Statement for the year ended December 31, 2009 of €434 million includes:

(€ million)

2009

Dividend distribution by the parent company

(554)

Third party share in dividend distributions of subsidiaries

(202)

Scrip dividend(1)

 322

Total dividend paid

(434)


(1)

The lines “Proceeds on issue of shares” and “Dividends paid” in the Consolidated Cash Flow Statement are presented net of scrip dividends as such distributions do not generate cash flows.


Note

F-10



Back to Contents


NOTE 1

Accounting principles and methods

1.1

PreparationAccounting standards framework

1.1.1

Basis underlying the preparation of 2006the financial statementsinformation

In accordance with European Parliament and CouncilPursuant to Regulation (EC) No.1606/n°1606/2002 of July 19, 2002, andas amended by European Commission Regulation (EC) No.1725/2003regulation n°297/2008 of September 29, 2003,March 11, 2008, the Veolia Environnement consolidated financial statements are, sincefor the year ended December 31, 2005,2009 are presented in accordance with InternationalIFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS),Standards) as adopted by the European Union and IFRS as published by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). These standards may be consulted at the following European Union website: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/accounting/ias/index_fr. htm

These financial statements are accompanied, for comparative purposes, by financial statements for fiscal years 2008 and 2007 drawn up in accordance with the same standards framework.

Since fiscal year 2006, the Group has accounted for its concession business in accordance with the principles set out in IFRIC 12, Service Concession Arrangements, published by the IASB on November 30, 2006 and adopted by the European Union.Union on March 26, 2009.

However,In the absence of IFRS standards or interpretations and in accordance with IAS 8,Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors, Veolia Environnement uses other standard references and in particular U.S. standards.

1.1.2

Standards, standard amendments and interpretations applicable from fiscal year 2009

The accounting principles and valuation rules applied by the Group in preparing the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 are identical to those applied by the Group as of December 31, 2008, with the exception of the following standards, standard amendments and interpretations which came into mandatory effect as of January 1, 2009 or July 1, 2009:

IFRS 8,Operating Segments

The impact of the implementation of this new standard is presented in Note 1.26 below.

IAS 1 Revised,Presentation of Financial Statements

Pursuant to the revised standard, the “Balance sheet” is now known as the “Consolidated Statement of Financial Position” and the changes resulting from transactions with owners of the Company acting in this capacity are presented separately from transactions with non-controlling interests in the Statement of Changes in Equity, which is now presented with the financial statements.

IFRIC 18,Transfers of assets from Customers

IFRIC 18,Transfers of Assets from Customers, is applicable from July 1, 2009 but was not adopted by the European Union until December 1, 2009. The interpretation is of prospective applicability and the Group did not elect for early adoption.

The interpretation covers situations where a customer transfers an asset to a supplier at the beginning of a contract, which the supplier must then use for the supply of goods or services. This interpretation also applies to cash transferred by a customer to finance the acquisition or construction of assets by the supplier to be used for the supply of goods or services. Contracts and services covered by the provisions of IFRIC 12 are specifically excluded from the scope of this interpretation.

Within the Group, this interpretation is likely to impact the Water and Energy Services Divisions. The Group has allocated the necessary resources to analyze the contracts signed since July 1, 2009, likely to fall within the application scope of IFRIC 18.



F-11



Back to Contents


IAS 23 Revised,Borrowing Costs

Amendments to IAS 32 and IAS 1,Financial Instruments – Presentation: puttable financial instruments and obligations arising on liquidation

Amendments to IFRS 1 and IAS 27 relating to the cost of an investment on first-time adoption of IAS/IFRS

Amendment to IFRS 2,Share-based Paymentvesting conditions and cancellations

Amendments arising from the 2006-2008 annual improvement process, with the exception of the amendments to IFRS 5

Amendment to IFRS 7,Financial Instruments: DisclosuresImprovements to Financial Instrument Disclosures

Amendment to IAS 39 and IFRIC 9 relating to embedded derivatives

IFRIC 13,Customer Loyalty Programmes

IFRIC 15,Agreements for the Construction of Real Estate

IFRIC 16,Hedges of a Net Investment in a Foreign Operation

Implementation of these standards and interpretations did not have a material impact.

1.1.3

Texts which enter into mandatory effect after December 31, 2009 and which have not been adopted early

Veolia Environnement has not elected for early adoption of the following standards, standard amendments and interpretations published as of December 31, 2009 (adopted or in the course of being adopted by the European Union):

IFRS 3 Revised,Business Combinations

Amendment to IAS 27,Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements

The application of IFRS 3 Revised and IAS 27 Revised is likely to have a material impact on future business combinations or transactions with non-controlling interests.

Amendments resulting from the 2007-2009 annual improvement process (not adopted by the European Union).

Pursuant to the new amendment specifying the conditions for implementing IAS 7, the Group will eliminate the replacement costs detailed in Note 19, Operating income, from “Net cash from operating activities” in the Consolidated Cash Flow Statement, from January 1, 2010.

Consequently, when adjusting “Net income attributable to owners of the Company” to obtain “Net cash from operating activities”, replacement costs will no longer be eliminated under “Operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses.” This amendment has no impact on net income or equity.

Amendments to IAS 28 and IAS 31 subsequent to IFRS 3 revised

IAS 24 Revised,Related Party Disclosures (not adopted by the European Union)

Amendment to IAS 32,Financial Instruments: Disclosures: Classification of rights issues

Amendment to IAS 39,Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement:Eligible Hedged Items

Amendment to IFRS 2,Share-based Payment - Group cash-settled share-based payment transactions, (not adopted by the European Union)



F-12



Back to Contents


Amendment to IFRS 5 resulting from the 2006-2008 annual improvement process

IFRIC 17, Distribution of Non-cash Assets to Owners

IFRIC 19,Extinguishing Financial Liabilities with Equity Instruments (not adopted by the European Union)

Amendment to IFRIC 14,Prepayments of a Minimum Funding Requirement(not adopted by the European Union)

IFRS 9,Financial Instruments, Classification and Measurement (not adopted by the European Union)

Subject to their definitive adoption by the European Union, these standards, standard amendments and interpretations are of mandatory application from July 1, 2009 or later, that is from January 1, 2010 or later for the Group. The Group is currently assessing the potential impact of the first-time application of these new texts.

1.2

General principles underlying the preparation of the financial statements

The accounting methods presented below have been applied consistently for all periods presented in the consolidated financial statements.

The consolidated financial statements are presented on the basis of historical cost, with the exception of assets and liabilities recognized at fair value: derivatives, financial instruments held for trading, financial instruments designated at fair value and available-for-sale financial instruments (in accordance with IAS 32 and IAS 39).

The Veolia Environnement consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 were adopted by the Board of Directors on March 24, 2010 and will be presented for approval to the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders on May 7, 2010.

1.3

Basis of presentation as of December 31, 2009

The consolidated financial statements are presented in millions of euro, unless stated otherwise.

The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of Veolia Environnement SA and its subsidiaries. The financial statements of subsidiaries are drawn up for the same reference period as those of the parent company, from January 1, to December 31, 2009, in accordance with uniform accounting policies and methods.

All inter-company balances and transactions, together with all income and expense items and unrealized gains and losses included in the net carrying amount of assets, resulting from internal transactions, are eliminated in full.

Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date of acquisition, which is the date on which the Group obtains control, up to the date on which it ceases to exercise control.

Non-controlling interests represent the part of net income or loss and of net assets not held by the Group. They are presented in the Consolidated Income Statement, the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income and in equity in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, separately from equity attributable to the owners of the Company.

1.4

Principles of Consolidation

Veolia Environnement fully consolidates all entities over which it exercises control. Control is defined as the ability to govern, directly or indirectly, the financial and operating policies of an entity in order to obtain the benefit of its activities.

Pursuant to the provisions of IAS 28, Investments in Associates, Veolia Environnement accounts for associates using the equity method where it exercises significant influence over financial and operating policies. Significant influence is presumed to exist where the Group holds at least 20% of share capital or voting rights.

Companies over which Veolia Environnement exercises joint control as a result of a contractual agreement between partners are consolidated using the proportionate method in accordance with IAS 31, Interests in Joint Ventures.



F-13



Back to Contents


Pursuant to SIC 12, Consolidation - Special Purpose Entities, special-purpose entities (SPEs) are consolidated when the substance of the relationship between the SPE and Veolia Environnement or its subsidiaries indicates that the SPE is controlled by Veolia Environnement. Control may arise through the predetermination of the activities of the SPE or through the fact that, in substance, the financial and operating policies are defined by Veolia Environnement or Veolia Environnement benefits from most of the economic advantages and/or assumes most of the economic risks related to the activity of the SPE.

Pursuant to IAS 27,Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements, potential voting rights available for exercise attached to financial instruments which, if exercised, would confer voting rights on Veolia Environnement and its subsidiaries, are taken into account where necessary in assessing the level of control or significant influence exercised.

1.5

Translation of foreign subsidiaries’ financial statements

Balance sheets, income statements and cash flow statements of subsidiaries whose functional currency is different from the presentation currency of the Group are translated into the presentation currency at the applicable rate of exchange (i.e. the year-end rate for balance sheet items and the average annual rate for income statement and cash flow items). Foreign exchange translation gains and losses are recorded in other comprehensive income in equity. The exchange rates of the major currencies of non-euro countries used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements were as follows:

Year end exchange rate

(one foreign currency unit = €xx)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31, 2007

U.S. Dollar

0.6942

0.7185

0.6793

Pound Sterling

1.1260

1.0499

1.3636

Czech Crown

0.0378

0.0372

0.0376

    

Average annual exchange rate

(one foreign currency unit = €xx)

Average
annual rate 2009

Average
annual rate 2008

Average
annual rate 2007

U.S. Dollar

0.7177

0.6782

0.7248

Pound Sterling

1.1222

1.2433

1.4550

Czech Crown

0.0378

0.0399

0.0361


1.6

Foreign currency transactions

Foreign currency transactions are translated into euro at the exchange rate prevailing at the transaction date. At the year end, foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured in euro at year-end exchange rates. The resulting foreign exchange gains and losses are recorded in net income for the period.

Loans to a foreign subsidiary the settlement of which is neither planned nor probable in the foreseeable future represent, in substance, a portion of the Group’s net investment in this foreign operation. Foreign exchange gains and losses on monetary items forming part of a net investment are recognized directly in other comprehensive income in foreign exchange translation adjustments and are released to income on the disposal of the net investment. The impact on the Veolia Environnement financial statements is not material.

Exchange gains and losses on foreign currency-denominated borrowings or on currency derivatives that qualify as hedges of a net investment in a foreign operation, are recognized directly in other comprehensive income as foreign exchange translation adjustments. Amounts recognized in other comprehensive income are released to income on the sale date of the relevant investment.

Foreign currency-denominated non-monetary assets and liabilities recognized at historical cost are translated using the exchange rate prevailing as of the transaction date. Foreign currency-denominated non-monetary assets and liabilities recognized at fair value are translated using the exchange rate prevailing as of the date the fair value is determined.



F-14



Back to Contents


1.7

Property, plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment are recorded at historical acquisition cost to the Group, less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses.

Property, plant and equipment are recorded by component, with each component depreciated over its useful life.

Useful lives are as follows:

Range of useful lives in number of years *

Buildings

20 to 50

Technical systems

7 to 24

Vehicles

3 to 25

Other plant and equipment

3 to 12


*

The range of useful lives is due to the diversity of property, plant and equipment concerned


Borrowing costs attributable to the acquisition or construction of identified installations, incurred during the construction period, are included in the cost of those assets in accordance with IAS 23,Borrowing costs.

A finance lease contract is a contract that transfers to the Group substantially all the risks and rewards related to the ownership of an asset.

Pursuant to IAS 17, Leases, assets financed by finance lease are initially recorded in property, plant and equipment at the lower of fair value and the present value of future minimum lease payments. Subsequently, these assets are recognized at the lower of the present value of minimum lease payments less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses, and market value, and depreciated over the shorter of the lease term and the expected useful life of the assets, unless it is reasonably certain that the asset will become the property of the lessee at the end of the contract.

Given the nature of the Group’s businesses, the subsidiaries do not own investment property in the normal course of their operations.

1.8

Government grants

1.8.1

Investment grants for property, plant and equipment

In accordance with the option offered by IAS 20,Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance, investment grants are deducted from the gross carrying amount of property, plant and equipment to which they relate.

They are recognized as a reduction in the depreciation charge over the useful life of the depreciable asset.

When the construction of an asset covers more than one period, the portion of the grant not yet used is recorded in “Other liabilities” in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

1.8.2

Grants relating to concession arrangements

Grants received in respect of concession arrangements (see Note 1.21 for further details) are generally definitively earned and, therefore, are not repayable.

In accordance with the option offered by IAS 20, these grants are presented as a deduction from intangible assets or financial assets depending on the applicable model following an analysis of each concession arrangement (IFRIC 12).

Under the intangible asset model, the grant reduces the amortization charge in respect of the concession intangible asset over the residual term of the concession arrangement.

Under the financial asset model, investment grants are equated to a means of repaying the operating financial asset.



F-15



Back to Contents


1.8.3

Operating grants

Operating grants concern, by definition, operating items.

Where operating grants are intended to offset costs incurred, they are recognized as a deduction from the cost of goods sold over the period that matches them with related costs.

Where operating grants represent additional contractual remuneration of a recurring nature, such as contributions or compensation for inadequate revenue provided under certain public service delegation contracts, they are recognized in revenue.

1.9

Intangible assets excluding goodwill

Intangible assets are identifiable non-monetary assets without physical substance. They are recorded at acquisition cost less accumulated amortization and any accumulated impairment losses.

Intangible assets mainly consist of certain assets recognized in respect of concession arrangements (IFRIC 12), entry fees paid to local authorities for public service contracts, the value of contracts acquired through business combinations, patents, licenses, software and operating rights.

1.10

Business combinations and goodwill

Business combinations are recorded in accordance with the purchase accounting method as set out in IFRS 3. Under this method, assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed are recorded at fair value.

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed, if any. It is valued in the functional currency and recognized in assets in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

Pursuant to IFRS, goodwill is not amortized but is subject to impairment tests performed annually or more frequently where there is evidence calling into question the net carrying amount.

Where the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed, if any, exceeds the purchase price, “negative goodwill” is immediately recognized in net income.

Treatment of costs directly attributable to acquisitions incurred during 2009 and concerning acquisitions to be completed after January 1, 2010:

Costs directly attributable to business combinations incurred during 2009, and relating to acquisitions to be completed during fiscal year 2010, were expensed in net operating income for the year.

1.11

Impairment of intangible assets, property, plant and equipment and non-financial assets

The net carrying amount of non-financial assets, other than inventory and deferred tax assets, is reviewed at each period-end in order to assess the existence of any indication of loss in value. Where such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset (equal to the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use) is estimated.

The net carrying amount of an asset or group of assets is reduced to its recoverable amount (higher of the fair value less costs to sell and the value in use), where this is lower.

Impairment losses can be reversed, with the exception of those relating to goodwill.

Veolia Environnement performs systematic annual impairment tests in respect of goodwill and other intangible assets with an indefinite useful life following the preparation of a long-term plan, or more frequently where there is an indication of loss in value. Where an exceptional impairment must be recorded, it is deducted in priority from goodwill allocated to the cash-generating unit (CGU) and then, where applicable, pro rata to the net carrying amounts of the other assets of the CGU.

The value in use is determined by discounting the future cash flows expected to be derived from the asset, CGU or group of CGUs considered, taking into account, where appropriate, the residual value. Given the Group’s activities, the cash-generating units generally represent a country in each Division. Future cash flows are taken for the first six years from the long-term plan validated by Executive Management. The main assumptions included in the calculation of the value in use of each cash-generating unit are the discount rate, changes in activity volumes, prices and direct costs (inflation) over the period and investments.



F-16



Back to Contents


A discount rate (weighted average cost of capital) is determined for each asset, CGU or group of CGUs: it is equal to the risk-free rate plus a risk premium weighted for country-specific risks. The discount rates estimated by management for each cash-generating unit therefore reflect current market assessments of the time value of money and the country specific risks to which the cash-generating unit is exposed, with the other risks reflected in the expected future cash flows from the assets.

Changes in volumes, prices and direct costs are based on past changes and expected future market trends.

The terminal value is calculated based on discounted forecast flows for the last year (2015). These flows include organic growth such as inflation.

As Water activities in China follow a specific economic model, with extremely long contract terms (up to fifty years) and high investment flows during the initial contract years, fiscal year 2015 may not be considered a standard year. Therefore, exceptionally, the business plan was extended to 2024 for the “Water–China” cash-generating unit, in order to identify standard flows for the calculation of the terminal value. The growth rate to perpetuity set out in Note 4 applies from this year.

1.12

Inventories

In accordance with IAS 2,Inventories, inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the estimated costs of completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale.

1.13

Assets classified as held for sale and liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale, discontinued operations

IFRS 5,Non-Current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations, sets out the accounting treatment applicable to assets held for sale and presentation and disclosure requirements for discontinued operations.

The standard notably requires the separate presentation of assets held for sale in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position at the lower of net carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell.

In addition, the standard requires the separate presentation in the income statement of the results of discontinued operations for all comparative periods on a retrospective basis.

A discontinued operation is a component of an entity that either has been disposed of or is classified as held for sale and:

represents a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations,

is part of a single coordinated plan to dispose of a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations or,

is a subsidiary acquired exclusively with a view to resale.

Therefore, as of December 31, 2009, the results of operations sold or in the course of being sold in 2009 must also be adjusted in the comparative financial statements as of December 31, 2007 and 2008. The 2008 and 2007 comparative income statements therefore differ from those published previously.

The impact of these operations on cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities is presented at the foot of the Consolidated Cash Flow Statement for the year ended December 31, 2009 and comparative periods.

The 2008 and 2007 Consolidated Statements of Financial Position are unchanged.



F-17



Back to Contents


1.14

Provisions

Pursuant to IAS 37,Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets, a provision is recorded when, at the year end, the Group has a current legal or implicit obligation to a third party as a result of a past event, and it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and the amount of the obligation can be reliably estimated.

As part of its obligations under public services contracts, the Group generally assumes responsibility for the maintenance and repair of installations of the publicly-owned utility networks it manages. The resulting maintenance and repair costs are analyzed in accordance with IAS 37 on provisions and, where necessary, a provision for contractual commitments is recorded where there is outstanding work to be performed.

In the event of a restructuring, an obligation exists if, prior to the period end, the restructuring has been announced and a detailed plan produced or implementation has commenced. Future operating costs are not provided.

In the case of provisions for restoration of waste storage facilities, Veolia Environnement accounts for the obligation to restore a site as waste is deposited, recording a non-current asset component and taking into account inflation and the date on which expenses will be incurred (discounting). The asset is amortized based on its depletion.

Provisions giving rise to an outflow after more than one year are discounted if the impact is material. Discount rates reflect current assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the liability. The unwinding of the discount is recorded in the Consolidated Income Statement in “Other financial income and expenses”.

1.15

Financial instruments

1.15.1

Financial assets and liabilities

Financial assets include assets classified as available-for-sale and held-to maturity, assets at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement, asset derivative instruments, loans and receivables and cash and cash equivalents.

Financial liabilities include borrowings, other financing and bank overdrafts, liability derivative instruments and operating payables.

The recognition and measurement of financial assets and liabilities is governed by IAS 39.

1.15.2

Measurement, recognition and derecognition of financial assets

Financial assets are initially recognized at fair value including transaction costs, where the assets concerned are not subsequently measured at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement. Where the assets are measured at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement, transaction costs are expensed directly to net income.

The Group classifies financial assets in one of the four categories identified by IAS 39 on the acquisition date:

Held-to-maturity assets

Held-to-maturity assets are financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturities, other than loans and receivables, that the Group acquires with the positive intention and ability to hold to maturity. After initial recognition at fair value, held-to-maturity assets are recognized and measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.

Held-to-maturity assets are reviewed for objective evidence of impairment. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of the financial asset exceeds the present value of future cash flows discounted at the initial EIR. The impairment loss is recognized in the Consolidated Income Statement.

Net gains and losses on held-to-maturity assets consist of interest income and impairment losses.



F-18



Back to Contents


Available-for-sale assets

Available-for-sale assets mainly consist of non-consolidated investments and marketable securities that do not qualify for inclusion in other financial asset categories. They are measured at fair value, with fair value movements recognized directly in other comprehensive income, except where there is a material or long-term unrealized capital loss. This can arise when future cash flows decrease to such an extent that the fair value of these assets falls materially or long-term below the historical cost. Where this is the case, the impairment loss is recognized in the Consolidated Income Statement. Impairment reversals are recognized in the Consolidated Income Statement for debt securities only (receivables and bonds).

Amounts recognized in other comprehensive income are released to income on the sale of the relevant investment. Fair value is equal to market value in the case of quoted securities and an estimate of the fair value in the case of unquoted securities, determined based on financial criteria most appropriate to the specific situation of each security. Non-consolidated investments which are not quoted in an active market and for which the fair value cannot be measured reliably, are recorded as a last resort by the Group at historical cost less any accumulated impairment losses.

Net gains and losses on available-for-sale assets consist of interest income, dividends, impairment losses and capital gains and losses on disposal.

Loans and receivables

This category includes loans to non-consolidated investments, operating financial assets, other loans and receivables and trade receivables. After initial recognition at fair value, these instruments are recognized and measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.

An impairment loss is recognized if, where there exists an indication of impairment, the carrying amount of these assets exceeds the present value of future cash flows discounted at the initial EIR. The impairment loss is recognized in the Consolidated Income Statement.

The impairment of trade receivables is calculated using two methods:

a statistical method: this method is based on past losses and involves the application of a provision rate by category of aged receivables. The analysis is performed for a group of similar receivables, presenting similar credit characteristics as a result of belonging to a client category and country.

an individual method: the probability and amount of the loss is assessed on an individual case basis in particular for non-State public debtors (past due period, other receivables or payables with the counterparty, rating issued by an external rating agency, geographical location).

Net gains and losses on loans and receivables consist of interest income and impairment losses.

Assets and liabilities at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement

This category includes:

 trading assets and liabilities acquired by the Group for the purpose of selling them in the near term in order to realize a capital gain, which form part of a portfolio of identified financial instruments that are managed together and for which there is evidence of a recent actual pattern of short-term profit-taking. Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting are also considered trading assets and liabilities.

 assets designated at fair value and primarily the portfolio of cash UCITS whose performance and management is based on fair value.

Changes in the value of these assets are recognized in the Consolidated Income Statement.

Net gains and losses on assets at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement consist of interest income, dividends and fair value adjustments.

Net gains and losses on derivatives entered into for trading purposes consist of flows exchanged and the change in the value of the instrument.



F-19



Back to Contents


Derecognition of financial assets

The Group derecognizes a financial asset when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire or when it transfers the contractual rights to the cash flows from the financial asset in a transaction under which nearly all the rights and obligations inherent to ownership of the financial asset are transferred. Any interest created or retained by the Group in a financial asset is recognized separately as an asset or liability.

1.15.3

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash equivalents are held to meet short-term cash commitments. Cash and cash equivalents include all cash balances, deposits with a maturity of less than 3 months when initially recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, monetary UCITS and negotiable debt instruments. These investments can be converted into cash or sold in the very short term and do not present any material risk of loss in value. Cash equivalents are designated as assets at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement.

Bank overdrafts repayable on demand which form an integral part of the Group’s cash management policy represent a component of cash and cash equivalents for the purposes of the cash flow statement.

1.15.4

Recognition and measurement of financial liabilities

With the exception of trading liabilities and liability derivative instruments which are measured at fair value, borrowings and other financial liabilities are recognized initially at fair value less transaction costs and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.

The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments or receipts over the estimated term of the financial instrument or, where applicable, over a shorter period, to the net carrying amount of the financial asset or liability.

When the financial liability issued includes an embedded derivative which must be recognized separately, the amortized cost is calculated on the debt component only. The amortized cost at the acquisition date is equal to the proceeds from the issue less the fair value of the embedded derivative.

1.15.5

Non-controlling interest put options

Pursuant to IAS 27, non-controlling interests in fully consolidated subsidiaries are considered a component of equity.

Furthermore, in accordance with IAS 32, non-controlling interest put options are considered as liabilities.

Pending an IFRIC interpretation or a specific IFRS, the Group has adopted the following accounting treatment:

the present value of purchase commitments is recorded in borrowings in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, through non-controlling interests and where necessary goodwill for the residual balance

gains or losses resulting from the unwinding of the discount on the liability are recorded in finance costs and, when the put exercise price varies, changes in the value of the instrument resulting from changes in valuation assumptions concerning the commitment are recorded in borrowings through goodwill.

If the non-controlling interests have not been purchased on the expiry of the commitment, equity attributable to non-controlling interests is reconstituted through goodwill and the liability recognized in respect of the commitment (no longer necessary).



F-20



Back to Contents


1.15.6

Recognition and measurement of derivative instruments

The Group uses various derivative instruments to manage its exposure to interest rate and foreign exchange risks resulting from its operating, financial and investment activities. Certain transactions performed in accordance with the Group interest rate and foreign exchange risk management policy do not satisfy hedge accounting criteria and are recorded as trading instruments.

Derivative instruments are recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position at fair value. Other than the exceptions detailed below, changes in the fair value of derivative instruments are recorded through the Consolidated Income Statement. The fair value of derivatives is estimated using standard valuation models which take into account active market data.

Net gains and losses on instruments at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement consist of flows exchanged and the change in the value of the instrument.

Derivative instruments may be designated as hedges under one of three types of hedging relationship: fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation:

a fair value hedge is a hedge of exposure to changes in fair value of a recognized asset or liability, or an identified portion of such an asset or liability, that is attributable to a specific risk (notably interest rate or foreign exchange risk), and could affect net income for the period.

a cash flow hedge is a hedge of exposure to variability in cash flows that is attributable to a specific risk associated with a recognized asset or liability or a highly probable forecast transaction (such as a planned purchase or sale) and could affect net income for the period.

a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation hedges the exposure to foreign exchange risk of the net assets of a foreign operation including loans considered part of the investment (IAS 21,The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates).

An asset, liability, firm commitment, future cash-flow or net investment in a foreign operation qualifies for hedge accounting if:

the hedging relationship is precisely defined and documented at the inception date;

the effectiveness of the hedge is demonstrated at inception and by regular verification of the offsetting nature of movements in the market value of the hedging instrument and the hedged item. The ineffective portion of the hedge is systematically recognized in the Consolidated Income Statement.

The use of hedge accounting has the following consequences:

in the case of fair value hedges of existing assets and liabilities, the hedged portion of these items is measured at fair value in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position. The gain or loss on remeasurement is recognized in the Consolidated Income Statement, where it is offset against matching gains or losses arising on the fair value remeasurement of the hedging financial instrument, to the extent it is effective;

in the case of cash flow hedges, the portion of the gain or loss on the fair value remeasurement of the hedging instrument that is determined to be an effective hedge is recognized directly in other comprehensive income, while the gain or loss on the fair value remeasurement of the underlying item is not recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognized in the Consolidated Income Statement. Gains or losses recognized in other comprehensive income are released to the Consolidated Income Statement in the same period or periods in which the asset acquired or liability issued impacts net income;

in the case of net investment hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognized in translation reserves in other comprehensive income, while the ineffective portion is recognized in the Consolidated Income Statement. Gains and losses recognized in foreign exchange translation reserves are released to the Consolidated Income Statement when the foreign investment is sold.



F-21



Back to Contents


1.15.7

Embedded derivatives

An embedded derivative is a component of a host contract that satisfies the definition of a derivative and whose economic characteristics are not closely related to that of the host contract. An embedded derivative must be separated from its host contract and accounted for as a derivative if, and only if, the following three conditions are satisfied:

the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative are not closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract;

the embedded derivative satisfies the definition of a derivative laid down in IAS 39; and

the hybrid instrument is not measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in the Consolidated Income Statement.

1.15.8

Treasury shares

Treasury shares are deducted from equity.

Gains or losses arising from the sale of treasury shares and related dividends are recognized directly in equity and do not impact the Consolidated Income Statement.

1.16

Pension plans and other post-employment benefits

Veolia Environnement and its subsidiaries have several pension plans.

Defined contribution plans: plans under which the Group (or a Group entity) pays an agreed contribution to a separate entity, relieving it of any liability for future payments.

These obligations are expensed in the Consolidated Income Statement when due.

Defined benefit plans: all plans which do not meet the definition of a defined contribution plan. The net obligations of each Group entity are calculated for each plan based on an estimate of the amount employees will receive in exchange for services rendered during the current and past periods. This amount is then discounted to present value and unamortized past service costs and the fair value of plan assets are deducted.

Where the calculation shows a plan surplus, the asset recognized represents the difference between the discounted present value of profits, in the form of future repayments or reductions in plan contributions, less the amount of unamortized past service costs. The plan surplus is recognized in non-current financial assets.

Certain obligations of the Group or Group entities may enjoy repayment entitlement, corresponding to a commitment by a third party to repay in full or in part the expenses relating to these obligations. Repayment entitlement is recognized in non-current financial assets.

Employee obligations of the Group are calculated using the projected unit credit method. This method is based on the probability of personnel remaining with companies in the Group until retirement, the foreseeable changes in future compensation, and the appropriate discount rate. Specific discount rates are adopted for each monetary zone. This results in the recognition of pension-related assets or provisions in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position and the recognition of the related net expenses.

Pursuant to IAS 19 revised, Employee Benefits, actuarial gains and losses are offset against other comprehensive income and are not amortized in the Consolidated Income Statement.



F-22



Back to Contents


1.17

Share-based payments

Pursuant to IFRS 2,Share-based Payment, an expense is recorded in respect of share purchase or subscription plans and other share-based compensation granted by the Group to its employees. The fair value of these plans on the grant date is expensed in the Consolidated Income Statement and recognized directly in equity in the period in which the benefit is vested and the service is rendered.

The fair value of purchase and subscription options is calculated using the Black and Scholes model, taking into account the expected life of the options, the risk-free interest rate, expected volatility, determined based on observed volatility in the past and dividends expected on the shares.

The compensation expense in respect of employee saving plans corresponds to the difference between the subscription price and the average share price at each subscription date, less a discount for non-transferability and to the Company’s contribution to subscribers.

1.18

Revenue

Revenue represents sales of goods and services measured at the fair value of the counterparty received or receivable.

Revenue from the sale of goods or services is recognized when the following conditions are satisfied:

the amount of revenue can be measured reliably;

the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the goods have been transferred to the buyer;

the recovery of the counterparty is considered probable;

the costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the transaction can be measured reliably.

1.18.1

Sales of goods

Sales of goods mainly concern the sale of technological procedures and solutions relating to the treatment of water (drinking water and wastewater treatment) in the Water Division and sales of products related to recycling activities in the Environmental Services Division.

Revenue relating to these sales is recognized on physical delivery of the goods, which represents the transfer of the inherent risks of ownership of these goods.

1.18.2

Sales of services

The provision of services represents the majority of Group businesses such as the processing of waste, water distribution and related services, network operation and passenger transport and energy services (heat distribution, thermal services and public lighting).

Revenue from these activities is recognized when the service is rendered and it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to Group entities.

These activities involve the performance of a service agreed contractually (nature, price) with a public sector or industrial customer, within a set period. Billing is therefore based on the waste tonnage processed/ incinerated, the volume of water distributed, the thermal power delivered or the number of passengers transported, multiplied by the contractually agreed price.

It should be noted that fees and taxes collected on behalf of local authorities are excluded from Revenue when the Group does not bear the risk of payment default by third parties.



F-23



Back to Contents


1.18.3

Construction contracts (excluding service concession arrangements)

Construction contracts primarily concern the design and construction of the infrastructures necessary for water treatment/distribution and wastewater treatment activities.

The related revenue is recognized in accordance with IAS 11,Construction Contracts (see Note 1.23).

1.18.4

IFRIC 4 Contracts

Contracts falling within the scope of IFRIC 4, Determining Whether an Arrangement Contains a Lease (see Note 1.21), involve services generally rendered to industrial/private customers. All service components to which the parties have agreed are detailed in contracts such as BOT (Build Operate Transfer) contracts.

Services include the financing of the construction of a specific asset/installation on behalf of the customer and the operation of the asset concerned.

Revenue relating to the construction of the asset is recognized in accordance with the provisions of IAS 11 and the asset is recorded in operating financial assets. Revenue is recognized on a completion basis at each period end, based on actual and expected costs.

The financing of construction work involves finance costs that are invoiced to the customer and recognized in Revenue, under Revenue from operating financial assets. This interest is recognized in Revenue from the start of construction work and represents remuneration received by the builder/lender.

Revenue relating to the operation of the asset is recognized on delivery of the goods or performance of the service depending on the operating activity.

1.18.5

Concession arrangements (IFRIC 12)

See Note 1.21 on Service concession arrangements.

1.19

Financial items in the Consolidated Income Statement

Finance costs consist of interest payable on borrowings calculated using the amortized cost method and losses on interest rate derivatives, both qualifying and not qualifying as hedges.

Interest costs included in payments under lease finance contracts are accounted forrecorded using the effective interest method.

Finance income consists of gains on interest rate derivatives, both qualifying and not qualifying as hedges and income from cash investments and equivalents.

Interest income is recognized in the 2006 consolidatedConsolidated Income Statement when earned, using the effective interest method.

Other financial statementsincome and expenses primarily include income on financial receivables calculated using the effective interest method, dividends, foreign exchange gains and losses, impairment losses on financial assets and the unwinding of discounts on provisions.

1.20

Income taxes

The income tax expense (credit) includes the current tax charge (credit) and the deferred tax charge (credit).

Deferred tax assets are recognized on deductible timing differences, tax loss carry forwards and/or tax credit carry forwards.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in prevailing tax laws and rates at the year end. Deferred tax balances are not discounted.

A deferred tax asset is recognized to the extent that the Group is likely to generate sufficient future taxable profits against which the asset can be offset. Deferred tax assets are impaired to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available.



F-24



Back to Contents


1.21

Description of Group concession activities

In the course of its business, Veolia Environnement provides collective services (distribution of drinking water and heating, passenger transport network, household waste collection, etc.) to local authorities in return for a remuneration based on services rendered.

These collective services (also known as services of general interest or general economic interest or public services) are generally managed by Veolia Environnement under contracts entered into at the request of public bodies which retain control thereof.

Concession arrangements involve the transfer of operating rights for a limited period, under the control of the local authority, using dedicated installations built by Veolia Environnement, or made available to it for a fee or nil consideration:

These contracts define “public service obligations” in return for remuneration. The remuneration is based on operating conditions, continuity of service, price rules and obligations with respect to the maintenance/replacement of installations. The contract determines the conditions for the transfer of installations to the local authority or a successor at its term.

Veolia Environnement can, in certain cases, be responsible for a given service as it holds the service support network (water/heat distribution network, water treatment network). Such situations are the result of full or partial privatizations. Provisions impose public service obligations and the means by which the local authority may recover control of the concession holder.

These contracts generally include price review clauses. These clauses are mainly based on cost trends, inflation, changes in tax and/or other legislation and occasionally on changes in volumes and/or the occurrence of specific events changing the profitability of the contract.

In addition, the Group generally assumes a contractual obligation to maintain and repair facilities managed under public service contracts. The resulting maintenance and repair costs are analyzed in accordance with IAS 37 on provisions and, where appropriate, a provision for contractual commitments is recorded in respect of commitments resulting from delays in the performance of work.

The nature and extent of the Group’s rights and obligations under these different contracts differ according to the public services rendered by the different Group divisions.

The accounting treatment is disclosed in Notes 5 and 10.

Water:

Veolia Environnement manages municipal drinking water and/or waste water services. These services encompass all or part of the water cycle (extraction from natural sources, treatment, storage and distribution followed by collection and treatment of waste water and release into the environment).

In France, these services are primarily rendered under public service delegation “affermage” contracts with a term of 8 to 20 years. They concern the distribution of drinking water and/or the collection and treatment of waste water. They use specific assets, such as distribution or wastewater treatment networks and drinking water or wastewater treatment plants, which are generally provided by the concession grantor and returned to it at the end of the contract.

Abroad, Veolia Environnement renders its services under contracts which reflect local legislation, the economic situation of the country and the investment needs of each partner.

These contracts are generally concession arrangements, service contracts or O&M (Operate & Manage) and BOT contracts with an average term of between 7 and 40 years, and sometimes longer.

Contracts can also be entered into with public entities in which Veolia Environnement purchased an interest on their partial privatization. The profitability of these contracts is not fundamentally different from other contracts, but operations are based on a partnership agreement with the local authority.



F-25



Back to Contents


Environmental Services:

Both in France and abroad, the main concession arrangements entered into by Veolia Environnement concern the treatment and recovery of waste in sorting units, storage and incineration. These contracts have an average term of 18 to 30 years.

Energy Services:

Veolia Environnement has developed a range of energy management activities: heating and cooling networks, thermal and multi-technical services, industrial utilities, installation and maintenance of production equipment, integration services for the comprehensive management of buildings and electrical services on public roadways.

The main contracts concern the management of heating and air-conditioning networks under urban concessions or on behalf of local authorities.

In Eastern Europe, Veolia Environnement’s Energy Services Division provides services under mixed partial privatizations or through public-private partnerships with local authorities responsible for the production and distribution of thermal energy.

Transportation:

Veolia Environnement’s Transportation Division provides passenger transport services on behalf of local, regional and national public authorities.

Veolia Environnement primarily provides these services in France and abroad under service contracts comprising public service obligations (as per EU terminology), with terms of 7 to 15 years.

Accounting for service concession arrangements:

Concession arrangements are recognized in accordance with IFRIC 12,Service Concession Arrangements, published in November 2006. This interpretation, which is pending adoptionIFRIC 12 was approved by the European Union following a favorable vote of the EFRAG in March 2007, is applicable to accounting periods commencing on or after January 1, 2008. Veolia Environnement has elected for early adoption of this interpretation and the change in accounting method has been applied retrospectively in accordance with IAS 8 on Changes in accounting method.  The related impact on 2005 and 2004 balance sheet, income statement and cash flow statement as originally published is disclosed in notes 48 and 49.

As such, the Veolia Environnement consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 financial information has been adjusted accordingly for the retrospective adoption of IFRIC 12 (financial statements of 2005 and 2004 adjusted). The provisional impact of the early adoption of IFRIC 12 on the 2005 consolidated financial statements was communicated by Veolia Environnement in its update (filed September 26, 2006) to the Reference Document filed with the Financial Markets Authority (Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF)) on April 6, 2006.

Following a decision by the appropriate level of management to sell the Transportation Division’s Danish activities in 2007, the net income components of this activity were classified in Net income from discontinued operations in accordance with IFRS 5 on activities held for sale and the 2005 and 2004 consolidated financial statements were adjusted accordingly. The divestment of Southern Water was also recognized in accordance with IFRS 5 and the 2005 and 2004 consolidated financial statements were adjusted accordingly.  Lastly, the equity of minority interests in discontinued operations in 2004 has been reclassified as minority interests, rather than presenting discontinued operations net of related minority interests (see Notes 29 and 47).

The accounting methods presented below have been applied consistently for all periods presented in the consolidated financial statements.

The consolidated financial statements are presented using the historical cost convention, with the exception of assets and liabilities recognized at fair value: derivative instruments, financial instruments held for trading and available-for-sale financial instruments (in accordance with IAS 32 and IAS 39).

The Veolia Environnement consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006 were closed by the Board of Directors on March 7, 2007.


1.2

Basis of presentation as of December 31, 2006

The consolidated financial statements are presented in millions of euro, unless stated otherwise.

The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of Veolia Environnement SA and its subsidiaries as of December 31 each year. The financial statements of subsidiaries are drawn up for the same reference period as those of the parent company, in accordance with uniform accounting policies and methods.

All inter-company balances and transactions, together with all income and expense items and unrealized gains and losses included in the net carrying amount of assets, resulting from internal transactions, are eliminated in full.

Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date of acquisition, which is the date on which the Group obtains control, up to the date on which it ceases to exercise control.

Minority interests represent the share of net income or loss and of net assets not held by the Group.  They are presented separately in the Income Statement and separately from equity attributable to equity holders of the parent in Equity in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.





Back to contents



1.3

Principles of Consolidation

Veolia Environnement fully consolidates all entities over which it exercises control. Control is defined as the ability to govern, directly or indirectly, the financial and operating policies of an entity in order to obtain the benefit of its activities.

Companies in which Veolia Environnement exercises significant influence over financial and operating policies are accounted for using the equity method. Significant influence is presumed to exist where the Group holds at least 20% of share capital or voting rights.

Companies over which Veolia Environnement exercises joint control as a result of a contractual agreement between partners are consolidated using the proportionate method in accordance with IAS 31.

Pursuant to SIC 12, Special Purpose Entities (SPEs) are consolidated when the substance of the relationship between the SPE and Veolia Environnement or its subsidiaries indicates that the SPE is controlled by Veolia Environnement. Control may arise through the predetermination of the activities of the SPE or through the fact that, in substance, the financial and operating policies are defined by Veolia Environnement or Veolia Environnement benefits from most of the economic advantages and/or assumes most of the economic risks related to the activity of the SPE.

Pursuant to IAS 27, potential voting rights available for exercise attached to financial instruments which, if exercised, would confer voting rights on Veolia Environnement and its subsidiaries, are taken into account where necessary in assessing the level of percentage control or significant influence exercised.


1.4

Translation of Foreign Subsidiaries' Financial Statements (IAS 21)

Balance sheets, income statements and cash flow statements of subsidiaries whose functional currency is different from that of the Group are translated into the reporting currency at the applicable rate of exchange (i.e., the year-end rate for balance sheet items and the average annual rate for income statement and cash flow items). Translation gains and losses are recorded in equity. The exchange rates of the major currencies of non-euro countries used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements were as follows:


Year-end exchange rate

(one foreign currency unit = €xx)

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

U.S. Dollar

0.7593

0.8477

0.7342

Pound Sterling

1.4892

1.4592

1.4183

Czech Crown

0.0364

0.0345

0.0328

    

Average annual exchange rate

(one foreign currency unit = €xx)

Average rate

 2006

Average rate

2005

Average rate

2004

U.S. Dollar

0.7918

0.8078

0.8025

Pound Sterling

1.4665

1.4640

1.4721

Czech Crown

0.0354

0.0336

0.0314


1.5

Foreign currency transactions (IAS 21 – IAS 39)

Foreign currency transactions are translated into euro at the exchange rate prevailing at the transaction date. At the year end, foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured in euro at year-end exchange rates. The resulting foreign exchange gains and losses are recorded in net income for the period.

Loans to a subsidiary the settlement of which is neither planned nor probable in the foreseeable future represent, in substance, a portion of the Group’s net investment in this foreign operation. Foreign exchange gains and losses on monetary items forming part of a net investment are recognized directly in equity as foreign exchange translation adjustments and are released to income on the disposal of the net investment.

Exchange gains and losses on foreign currency-denominated borrowings or on foreign currency derivatives that qualify as hedges of net investments in foreign subsidiaries, are recognized directly in equity as foreign exchange translation adjustments. Amounts recognized in equity are released to income on the sale of the relevant investment.

Foreign currency-denominated non-monetary assets and liabilities recognized at historical cost are translated using the exchange rate prevailing as of the transaction date. Foreign currency-denominated non-monetary assets and liabilities recognized at fair value are translated using the exchange rate prevailing as of the date the fair value is determined.

In May 2006, the European Union adopted IAS 21 revised, application of which is mandatory from January 1, 2006. The revised text states that in the case of a net investment in a foreign operation, foreign exchange gains or losses on loans denominated in a currency that is not the functional currency of the lending or borrowing company must be recognized in foreign exchange translation reserves. The impact on the Veolia Environnement consolidated financial statements is not material.





Back to contents



1.6

Property, plant and equipment (IAS 16 and IAS 17)

Property, plant and equipment are recorded at historical acquisition cost to the Group, less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses.

Property, plant and equipment are recorded by component, with each component depreciated over its useful life.

Expected “average” useful lives are as follows:


Expected average useful life

(in years)

Buildings

20 to 50

Technical systems

7 to 24

Vehicles

3 to 25

Other plant and equipment

3 to 12

Borrowing costs attributable to the acquisition or construction of identified installations, incurred during the construction period, are included in the cost of those assets in accordance with IAS 23 (Borrowing costs).

A finance lease contract is a contract that transfers to the Group substantially all the risks and rewards related to the ownership of an asset.

Pursuant to IAS 17,Leases, assets financed by finance lease are recorded in property, plant and equipment at the present value of minimum lease payments less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses or, if lower, fair value and depreciated over the shorter of the lease term and the expected useful life of the assets, unless it is reasonably certain that the asset will become the property of the lessee at the end of the contract.

Given the nature of the Group's businesses, the Divisions do not own investment property in the normal course of their operations.


1.7

Government grants (IAS 20)

1.7.1

Investment grants for property, plant and equipment

In accordance with the option offered by IAS 20, investment grants are deducted from the gross carrying amount of property, plant and equipment to which they relate.

They are recognized as a reduction in the depreciation charge over the useful life of the depreciable asset.

When the construction of an asset covers more than one period, the portion of the grant not yet used is recorded in Other liabilities in the Balance Sheet.

1.7.2

Grants relating to concession contracts

Grants received in respect of concession contracts (see Note 1.20 for further details) are generally definitively earned and, therefore, are not repayable.

In accordance with the option offered by the standard, these grants are presented as a deduction from concession intangible assets when the corresponding concession contract is recognized in accordance with the intangible asset model and as a deduction from operating financial assets when the concession contract is recognized in accordance with the financial asset model.

Under the intangible asset model, the grant reduces the amortization charge in respect of the concession intangible asset over the residual term of the concession contract.

Under the financial asset model, investment grants are equated to a means of repaying the operating financial asset.

1.7.3

Operating grants

Operating grants concern, by definition, operating items.

They are recognized as a deduction from the cost of goods sold, on a systematic and rational basis, over the period that matches them with related costs.


1.8

Intangible assets excluding goodwill (IAS 38)

Intangible assets are identifiable non-monetary assets without physical substance. They are recorded at acquisition cost less accumulated amortization and any accumulated impairment losses.

Intangible assets mainly consist of entry fees paid to local authorities for public service contracts, the value of contracts acquired through business combinations, patents, licenses, software and operating rights.


1.9

Business Combinations and Goodwill (IFRS 3)

All business combinations are recorded in accordance with the purchase accounting method. Goodwill arises on the acquisition of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures. Assets acquired, liabilities and contigent liabilities assumed are recorded at fair value. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed, if any, is capitalized as goodwill.

Goodwill is not amortized under IFRS, but subject to impairment tests performed at the level of the cash generating unit (“CGU”), at least once annually. Under IAS 36, the cash generating unit is generally defined as a country per business segment. This is generally the level at




Back to contents



which Veolia Environnement manages operations.


1.10

Asset impairment (IAS 36)

The Group performs impairment tests on intangible assets and property, plant and equipment if there is internal or external indication of impairment loss.

Veolia Environnement performs systematic annual impairment tests in respect of goodwill and other intangible assets with an indefinite useful life following the preparation of a long-term plan, or more frequently where there is an indication of decrease in value. In such case, the long-term prospects of an activity are reviewed, a valuation is performed and an impairment is recorded in priority against goodwill in interim financial reporting if necessary.

The net carrying amount of an asset or group of assets is reduced to its recoverable amount (higher of the fair value less costs to sell and the value in use), where this is less.

The value in use is determined by discounting the future cash flows expected to be derived from the asset, cash generating unit (CGU) or group of CGUs considered, taking into account, where appropriate, the residual value, discounted using the discount rate determined for each asset, CGU or group of CGUs and corresponding to the risk-free rate plus a risk premium weighted for business-specific risks. Given the activities of the Group, cash generating units generally correspond to a country in each Division.

Impairment losses can be reversed, with the exception of goodwill.


1.11

Inventories (IAS 2)

In accordance with IAS 2, inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the estimated costs of completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale.


1.12

Non-current assets held for sale, discontinued operations (IFRS 5)

Non-current assets and liabilities held for sale are stated at the lower of their net carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell.

The net income or loss realized by discontinued activities is reported on a separate line of the Income Statement.


1.13

Provisions (IAS 37)

Pursuant to IAS 37, a provision is recorded when, at the year end, the Group has a current legal or implicit obligation to a third party as a result of a past event, and it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and the amount of the obligation can be reliably estimated.

In the event of a restructuring, an obligation exists if, prior to the period end, the restructuring has been announced and a detailed plan produced or implementation has commenced. Future operating costs are not provided.

As part of its obligations under public services contracts, the Group assumes responsibility for the maintenance and repair of installations of the publicly-owned utility networks it manages. The resulting maintenance and repair costs are analyzed in accordance with IAS 37 on provisions and, where necessary, a provision for contractual commitments is recorded where there is outstanding work to be performed.

In the case of provisions for restoration of landfill sites (closure and post-closure costs), Veolia Environnement accounts for the obligation to restore a site as waste is deposited, recording a non-current asset component and taking into account inflation and the date on which expenses will be incurred (discounting). The asset is amortized based on its depletion.

Provisions giving rise to a cash outflow after more than one year are discounted if the impact is material. The unwinding of the discount is recorded in the Income Statement in “Other financial income and expenses”.





Back to contents



1.14

Financial instruments (IAS 32 and IAS 39)


Financial assets and liabilities

Financial assets include assets classified as available-for-sale, held-to maturity and assets at fair value throught income statement, asset derivative instruments, loans and receivables and cash and cash equivalents.

Financial liabilities include borrowings, other financing and bank overdrafts, liability derivative instruments and operating liabilities.

The recognition and measurement of financial assets and liabilities is governed by IAS 39,Financial instruments: recognition and measurement.


Recognition and measurement of financial assets

Financial assets are recognized at the settlement date. Financial assets are initially recognized at fair value, net of transaction costs. In the case of assets measured at fair value through the Income Statement, transaction costs are expensed directly to net income.

The Group classifies financial assets in one of the four categories identified by IAS 39 on the acquisition date:

Held-to-maturity assets

Held-to-maturity assets are financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturity, other than loans and receivables that the Group acquires with the positive intention and ability to hold to maturity. After initial recognition at fair value, held-to-maturity assets are recognized and measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.

Held-to-maturity assets are reviewed for objective evidence of impairment. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of the financial asset exceeds its recoverable amount, as estimated during impairment tests. The impairment loss is recognized in the Income Statement.

Available-for-sale assets

Available-for-sale assets mainly consist of non-consolidated investments and marketable securities that do not qualify for inclusion in other financial asset categories. They are measured at fair value, with fair value movements recognized directly in equity, unless an impairment test leads to the recognition of an unrealized capital loss compared with the historical acquisition cost and this is equated to a material and long-term loss. Where this is the case, the impairment loss is recognized in the Income Statement. Impairment reversals are recognized in the Income Statement for debt securities only (receivables and interest rate bonds).

Amounts recognized in equity are released to income on the sale of the relevant investment.  Fair value is equal to market value in the case of listed securities and an estimate of the value in use in the case of unlisted securities, determined based on financial criteria most appropriate to the specific situation of each security. Non-consolidated investments which are not listed on an active market and for which the fair value cannot be measured reliably, are recorded as a last resort by the Group at historical cost less any accumulated impairment losses.




Back to contents



Loans and receivables

This category includes loans to non-consolidated investments, other loans and receivables and trade receivables. After initial recognition at fair value, these instruments are recognized and measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.

An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of these assets exceeds the recoverable amount, as estimated during impairment tests. The impairment loss is recognized in the Income Statement.

Assets at fair value through the Income Statement

This category includes trading assets acquired by the Company for the purpose of selling them in the near term in order to realize a capital gain, which form part of a portfolio of identified financial instruments that are managed together and for which there is evidence of a recent actual pattern of short-term profit-taking. Assets at fair value through the Income Statement also include the portfolio of cash UCITS whose performance and management are based on fair values. Changes in the value of these assets are recognized in the Income Statement.


Cash and cash equivalents

Cash equivalents are held to meet short-term cash commitments rather than for investment or other purposes. Cash and cash equivalents include all cash balances, deposits with a maturity of less than 3 months when initially recorded in the Balance Sheet, monetary UCITS and negotiable debt instruments. These investments can be converted into cash or sold in the very short term and do not present any material risk of loss in value. Cash and cash equivalents are valued in accordance with the rules applicable to the Assets at fair value through the Income Statement category.

Bank overdrafts repayable on demand which form an integral part of the Group’s cash management policy represent a component of cash and cash equivalents for the purposes of the cash flow statement.


Recognition and measurement of financial liabilities

With the exception of trading liabilities and liability derivative instruments which are measured at fair value, borrowings and other financial liabilities are recognized initially at fair value less transaction costs and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.

The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments through to maturity or the next market-price fixing date, to the net carrying amount of the financial liability.

When the financial liability issued includes an embedded derivative which must be recognized separately, the amortized cost is calculated on the debt component only.  The amortized cost at the acquisition date is equal to the proceeds from the issue less the fair value of the embedded derivative.


Minority interest put options

Pursuant to IAS 27, minority interests in fully consolidated subsidiaries are considered a component of equity.

Furthermore, in accordance with IAS 32, minority interest put options are considered liabilities.

Pending an IFRIC interpretation or a specific IFRS, the Group has adopted the following treatment:

·

the present value of purchase undertakings is recorded in borrowings in the Balance Sheet, through minority interests and where necessary goodwill for the residual balance.

·

gains or losses resulting from the unwinding of the discount on the liability are recorded in finance costs and, when the put exercise price is variable, changes in the value of the instrument resulting from changes in valuation assumptions concerning the promise are recorded in borrowings through goodwill.

If the minority interests have not been purchased on the expiry of the commitment, minority interests in equity are reconstituted though goodwill and the liability recognized in respect of the commitment (no longer necessary).


Recognition and measurement of derivative instruments

The Group uses various derivative instruments to manage its exposure to interest rate and foreign exchange risks resulting from its operating, financial and investment activities whilie part of the global hedging policy. Certain transactions performed in accordance with the Group interest rate and foreign exchange risk management policy do not satisfy hedge accounting criteria and are recorded as trading instruments.

Derivative instruments are recognized in the balance sheet at fair value. Other than the exceptions detailed below, changes in the fair value of derivative instruments are recorded through the Income Statement. The fair value of derivatives is estimated using standard valuation models which take into account active market data.

Derivative instruments may be designated as hedges under one of three types of hedging relationship: fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or net investment hedge in a foreign operation:

·

a fair value hedge is a hedge of exposure to changes in fair value of a recognized asset or liability, or an identified portion of such an asset or liability, that is attributable to a particular risk (notably interest rate or foreign exchange risk), and could affect net income for the period.




Back to contents



·

a cash flow hedge is a hedge of exposure to variability in cash flows that is attributable to a particular risk associated with a recognized asset or liability or a highly probable forecast transaction (such as a planned purchase or sale) and could affect net income for the period.

·

the net investment hedge in a foreign operation hedges the exposure to foreign exchange risk of the net assets of a foreign operation including loans considered part of the investment (IAS 21).

An asset, liability, firm commitment, future cash-flow or net investment in a foreign operation qualifies for hedge accounting if:


·

the hedging relationship is precisely defined and documented at the inception date;

·

the effectiveness of the hedge is demonstrated at inception and by regular verification of the offsetting nature of movements in the market value of the hedging instrument and the hedged item. The ineffective portion of the hedge is systematically recognized in the Income Statement.

The use of hedge accounting has the following consequences:

·

in the case of fair value hedges of existing assets and liabilities, the hedged portion of these items is measured at fair value in the Balance Sheet. The gain or loss on remeasurement is recognized in the Income Statement, where it is offset against matching gains or losses arising on the fair value remeasurement of the hedging financial instrument, to the extent it is effective;

·

in the case of cash flow hedges, the portion of the gain or loss on the fair value remeasurement of the hedging instrument that is determined to be an effective hedge is recognized directly in equity, while the gain or loss on the fair value remeasurement of the underlying item is not recognized in the balance sheet. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognized in the Income Statement. Gains or losses recognized in equity are released to the Income Statement  in the same period or periods in which the asset acquired or liability issued impacts the Income Statement;

·

in the case of net investment hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognized in translation reserves in equity, while the ineffective portion is recognized in the Income Statement. Gains and losses recognized in foreign exchange translation reserves are released to the Income Statement when the foreign investment is sold.


Embedded derivatives

An embedded derivative is a component of a host contract that satisfies the definition of a derivative and whose economic characteristics are not closely related to that of the host contract. An embedded derivative must be separated from its host contract and accounted for as a derivative if, and only if, the following three conditions are satisfied:

·

the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative are not closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract;

·

the embedded derivative satisfies the definition of a derivative laid down in IAS 39; and

·

the hybrid instrument is not measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in the Income Statement.


Treasury shares

Treasury shares are deducted from equity.

Gains or losses arising on the sale of treasury shares are recognized directly in equity and do not impact the Income Statement.


1.15

Pension plans and other post-employment benefits (IAS 19)

The Group has several pension plans. Pension obligations are calculated using the projected unit credit method. This method is based on the probability of personnel remaining with companies in the Group until retirement, the foreseeable changes in future compensation, and the appropriate discount rate. Specific discount rates are adopted for each monetary zone. This results in the recognition of pension-related assets or liabilities, and the recognition of the related net expenses.

As Veolia Environnement elected to offset actuarial gains and losses against equity as of January 1, 2004 and for early adoption as of January 1, 2005 of IAS 19 (revised), actuarial gains and losses are recognized directly in equity and are not amortized to the Income Statement.


1.16

Share-based payments (IFRS 2)

Pursuant to IFRS 2,Share-based Payment, an expense is recorded in respect of share purchase or subscription plans and other share-based compensation granted by the Group to its employees. The fair value of these plans on the grant date is expensed in the Income Statement and recognized directly in equity in the period in which the benefit is vested and the service is rendered. In accordance with IFRS 2, in order to ensure the comparability of the 2005 and 2004 financial statements, only those plans granted after November 7, 2002 and for which rights have not been vested as of January 1, 2005 are measured and recognized in personnel costs.


The fair value of purchase and subscription options is calculated using the Black and Scholes model, taking into account the expected life of the options, the risk-free interest rate, observed volatility in the past and dividends expected on the shares.

The compensation expense in respect of employee savings plans is equal to the difference between the subscription price and the average share price at each subscription date, less a discount for non-transferability.




Back to contents




1.17

Revenue (IAS 18)

Revenue represents sales of goods and services measured at the fair value of the counterparty received or receivable.

Revenue from the sale of goods or services is recognized when the following conditions are satisfied:

·

the amount of revenue can be measured reliably;

·

the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the goods have been transferred to the buyer;

·

the recovery of the counterparty is considered probable;

·

the costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the transaction can be measured reliably.


1.17.1

Sales of goods

Sales of goods mainly concern water distribution and wastewater treatment construction work in the Water Division and sales of products related to recycling activities in the Waste Management Division.

Revenue relating to these sales is recognized on physical delivery of the goods, which represents the transfer of the inherent risks of ownership of these goods.


1.17.2

Sales of services

The provision of services represents the majority of Group businesses such as the processing of waste, water distribution and related services, network operation and passenger transport and energy services (heat distribution, thermal services and public lighting).

Revenue from these activities is recognized when the service is rendered and it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to Group entities.

These activities involve the performance of a service agreed contractually (nature, price) with a public sector or industrial customer, within a set period.  Billing is therefore based on the waste tonnage processed/ incinerated, the volume of water distributed, the thermal power delivered or the number of passengers transported, multiplied by the contractually agreed price.

Note that fees and taxes collected on behalf of local authorities are excluded from Revenue when there is no risk of payment default by third parties for the Group.

1.17.3

Construction contracts (excluding concession contracts)

Construction contracts primarily concern the design and construction of the infrastructures necessary for water treatment/distribution activities.

The related revenue is recognized in accordance with IAS 11 (see Note 1.22).

1.17.4

IFRIC 4 Contracts

Contracts falling within the scope of IFRIC 4 (see Note 1.21) involve services generally rendered to industrial/private customers (all service components to which the parties have agreed are detailed in contracts such as BOT (Build Operate Transfer) contracts.

Services include the financing of the construction of a specific asset/installation on behalf of the customer and the operation of the asset concerned.

Revenue relating to the construction of the asset is recognized in the same way as construction contracts, in accordance with the provisions of IAS 11 and recorded in operating financial assets. It is recognized on a completion basis at each period end, based on actual and expected costs.

The financing of construction work involves finance costs that are invoiced to the customer and recognized in Revenue, under Revenues from operating financial assets. This interest is recognized in Revenue from the start of construction work and represents remuneration received by the builder/lender.


Revenue relating to the operation of the asset is recognized on delivery of the goods or performance of the service depending on the operating activity.

1.17.5

Concession contracts (IFRIC 12)

See Note 1.20 on concession contracts.

1.18

Financial items in the Income Statement

Finance costs consist of interest payable on borrowings calculated using the amortized cost method and losses on interest rate derivatives, both qualifying and not qualifying as hedges.

Interest costs included in payments under lease finance contracts are recorded using the effective interest method.

Finance income consists of gains on interest rate derivatives, whether qualifying or not qualifying as hedges and income from cash investments and equivalents.



Back to contents



Other financial income and expenses notably include loan income calculated using the amortized cost method, dividends, foreign exchange gains and losses, impairment losses on financial assets and the unwinding of discounts on provisions.  


1.19

Income taxes (IAS 12)

The income tax expense (income) includes the current tax charge (income) and the deferred tax charge (income).

Deferred tax assets are recognized on deductible temporary differences, tax loss carry forwards and/or tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax liabilities are recognized on taxable temporary differences.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in prevailing tax laws and rates at the year end. Deferred tax balances are not discounted.

A deferred tax asset is recognized to the extent that the Group is likely to generate sufficient future taxable profits against which the asset can be offset. Deferred tax assets are impaired to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available.


1.20

Concession contracts (IFRIC 12)

IFRIC 12 on the accounting treatment of concession contracts is adopted early by the Group in the 2006 consolidated financial statements.26, 2009.

A substantial portion of the Group’s assets areis used within the framework of concession or affermage contractcontracts granted by public sector customers (“grantors”) and/or by concession companies purchased by the Group on full or partial privatization. The characteristics of these contracts vary significantly depending on the country and activity concerned.

Nonetheless, they generally provide, directly or indirectly, for customer involvement in the determination of the service and its remuneration, and the return of the assets necessary to the performance of the service at the end of the contract.

In order to fall within the scope of IFRIC 12 is applicable to concession arrangements comprising a contract must satisfypublic service obligation and satisfying all of the following two criteria:

·

the concession grantor controls or regulates whatthe services to be provided by the operator must provide withusing the asset, the infrastructure, to whom it must provide them,the beneficiaries of the services and at what price; andprices applied;

·

the grantor controls the significant residual interest in the infrastructure at the end of the term of the arrangement.

Pursuant to IFRIC 12, such infrastructures are not recognized in assets of the operator as property, plant and equipment but in financial assets (“financial asset model”) and/or intangible assets (“intangible asset model”) depending on the remuneration commitments given by the grantor.

1.20.1

F-26



Back to Contents


1.21.1

Financial asset model”model

The financial asset model applies when the operator has an unconditional right to receive cash or another financial asset from the grantor.

In the case of concession services, the operator has such an unconditional right if the grantor contractually guarantees the payment of:

·

amounts specified or determined in the contract or

·

the shortfall, if any, between amounts received from users of the public service and amounts specified or determined in the contract.

Financial assets resulting from the application of IFRIC 12 are recorded in the Balance SheetConsolidated Statement of Financial Position under the heading “Operating financial assets” and recognized at amortized cost.

Unless otherwise indicated in the contract, the effective interest rate is equal to the weighted average cost of capital of the entities carrying the assets concerned.

Pursuant to IAS 39, an impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of these assets exceeds the fairpresent value as estimated during impairment tests. Fair value is estimated based on the recoverable amount, calculated by discountingof future cash flows (value in use method).discounted at the initial EIR.

The portion falling due within less than one year is presented in “Current operating financial assets”, while the portion falling due within more than one year is presented in the non-current heading.

Pursuant to IAS 18, Revenue associated with this financial model includes:

·

revenue determinedrecorded on a completion basis, in the case of construction operating financial assets (in accordance with IAS 11);.

·

the remuneration of the operating financial asset recorded in Revenue from operating financial assets (excluding principal payments);

·

service remuneration.

1.20.21.21.2

Intangible asset model”model

The intangible asset model applies where the operator is paid by the users or where the concession grantor has not provided a contractual guarantee in respect of the amount recoverable.recoverable amount. The intangible asset corresponds to the right granted by the concession grantor to the operator to charge users of the public service.

Intangible assets resulting from the application of IFRIC 12 are recorded in the Balance SheetConsolidated Statement of Financial Position under the heading “Concession intangible assets” and are amortized, generally on a straight-line basis, over the contract term. However, fees paid to local authorities that are an integral part toof the cost of the intangible costsasset are disclosed under itemthe heading “Other intangible assets”.




Back to contents



Under the intangible asset model, Revenue includes:

·

revenue from therecorded on a completion basis for assets and infrastructure under construction of the infrastructure (in accordance with IAS11);IAS 11).

·

operating revenue of the infrastructure..service remuneration.

1.20.31.21.3

Mixed (or bifurcation) model”or bifurcation model

The choice of the financial asset or intangible asset model depends on the existence of payment guarantees granted by the concession grantor.

However, certain contracts may include a payment commitment on the part of the concession grantor covering only part of the investment, with the balance covered by royalties charged to users.

Where this is the case, the investment amount guaranteed by the concession grantor is recognized under the financial asset model and the residual balance is recognized under the intangible asset model.

1.21

Contracts Falling Within the Scope of IFRIC 4F-27



Back to Contents


1.22

Finance Leases

IFRIC 4 seeks to identify the contractual terms and conditions of agreements which, without taking the legal form of a lease, convey a right to use a group of assets in return for payments included in the overall contract remuneration. It identifies in such agreements a lease contract which is then analyzed and accounted for in accordance with the criteria laid down in IAS 17, based on the allocation of the risks and rewards of ownership,.ownership.

The contract operator therefore becomes the lessor vis-à-visof its customers. Where the lease transfers the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset in accordance with IAS 17 criteria, the operator recognizes a financial asset to reflect the corresponding financing, rather than an item of property, plant and equipment.

These financial assets are recorded in the Balance SheetConsolidated Statement of Financial Position under the heading “Operating financial assets”. They are initially recorded at the lower of fair value and total future flows and subsequently at amortized cost using the effective interest rate of the contract.

The portion falling due within less than one year is presented in “Current operating financial assets”, while the portion falling due within more than one year is presented in the non-current heading.

Contracts falling within the scope of IFRIC 4 are either outsourcing contracts with industrial customers, BOT (Build Operate Transfer) contracts, or incineration or cogeneration contracts under which, notably, demand or volume risk is, in substance, transferred to the prime contractor.

During the construction phase, a financial receivable is recognized in the balance sheetConsolidated Statement of Financial Position and operating incomerevenue in the Consolidated Income Statement, in accordance with the percentage completion method laid down in IAS 11 foron construction contracts.

The financial receivables resulting from this analysis are initially measured at the fair value of lease payments and then amortized using the effective interest method.

After a review of the contract and its financing, the implied interest rate on the financial receivable is based on either the Group financing rate and /or the borrowing rate associated with the contract.


1.221.23

Construction contracts (IAS 11)

Veolia Environnement recognizes income and expenses associated with construction contracts in accordance with the percentage of completion method defined in IAS 11.

These contracts are entered into with local authorities or private partners for the construction of the infrastructures necessary for the provision of services.infrastructures. They are generally fixed-price contracts as defined by IAS 11.

Revenue generated by construction services rendered by the Group is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable, where total income and expenses associated with the construction contract and the stage of completion can be determined reliably.

The percentage of completion is determined by comparing costs incurred as ofat the balance sheet dateperiod-end with total estimated costs under the contract. Costs incurred are recognized atas production cost and do not include either administrative or selling costs.

Where total contract costs exceed total contract revenue, the expected loss is recognized as an expense immediately via a provision for losses to completion, irrespective of the stage of completion and based on a best estimate of forecast results including, where appropriate, rights to additional income or compensation, where they are probable and can be determined reliably. Provisions for losses to completion are presented inrecorded as liabilities in the Balance Sheet.Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

Partial payments received under construction contracts before the corresponding work has been performed, are recognized in liabilities in the Balance SheetConsolidated Statement of Financial Position under advances and down-payments received.

The amount of costs incurred, plus profits and less losses recognized (notably(particularly in provisions for losses to completion) and intermediary billings is determined on an individual contract basis. Where positive, this amount is recognized in assets in “amounts due from customers for construction contract work”. Where negative, it is recognized in liabilities in “amounts due to customers for construction contract work”.




F-28



Back to contentsContents



1.231.24

Electricity purchase and sale contracts

Incidentally to their operations, certain Veolia Environnement subsidiaries are required to purchase or sell electricity on the market, in order to manage supplies and optimize costs.

Revenue

After analysis of contractual terms and conditions, income fromthe net margin on trading activity transactions falling within the scope of IAS 1 areis recognized in “Revenue”, for the related margin..

Financial instruments

Certain subsidiaries enter into electricity transactions (forward contracts, options) which are recognized as derivative financial instruments in accordance with IAS 39.

Application scope of IAS 39

Options and forward purchase and sale contracts with physical delivery are excluded from the application scope of IAS 39 if entered into for own use (exception for own-use).

This exception is applicable when the following conditions are satisfied:

·

The volumes purchased or sold under the contracts reflect the operating requirements of the subsidiary;

·

The contracts are not subject to net settlement as defined by IAS 39 and, in particular, physical delivery is systematic;

·

The contracts are not equivalent to sales of options, as defined by IAS 39.

Recognition and measurement of instruments falling within the application scope of IAS 39

Instruments falling within the application scope of IAS 39 are derivative instruments and are measured at fair value.value, calculated using models generally based on observable data. Fair value movements are recorded in operating income. The net impact of the unwinding of these transactions is recorded in revenue.revenue (see Note 28).

1.25

The fair valueGreenhouse gas emission rights

Faced with increased greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere, the International Community introduced a regulatory system within the framework of derivative instrumentsthe Kyoto protocol, aimed at reducing such emissions. This system was finalized in electricity is determined1997 and came into effect in February 2005 and seeks to achieve a reduction in emission levels of at least 5% compared to 1990, over the commitment period 2008-2012 for industrialized countries. Emissions are capped through the allocation of emission rights (AAU: Assigned Amount Units) to each country, which must be surrendered in 2014 based on actual emissions during the following basis:period 2008-2012. Developing countries have no reduction objectives under the Kyoto protocol, but emission credits (CER: Certified Emission Reduction) may be presented to companies or States that contribute to investments enabling a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions in these countri es.

·

Listed prices on active markets

·

InAt the absenceEuropean level, the European Union decided to implement, via directive 2003/87/EC of listed prices on active markets (notablyOctober 13, 2003, an internal trading system for electricity purchase options with extremely long maturity), valuation techniques integrating observable data onemission rights (EUA: EU Allowance). This system has been in effect since January 1, 2005. Draft directive 2004/101/EC established a link between the market (forward rates for commodities, rate curves, etc.)Kyoto system and the European system, enabling the operators concerned to use CER, up to an agreed maximum, to satisfy their surrender obligations in the absenceplace of observable data (particularlyEUA.

Directive 2009/29/EC of April 26, 2009 amended the ETS directive and extended the allowance trading system beyond the second period (2008-2012). It covers the period 2013-2020 and provides for distant maturities), parameters estimated by Veolia Environnement.


1.24

Greenhouse gazes emissiona progressive reduction in allowances

Pursuant to the Kyoto Protocol, the Group has undertaken to reduce the level of greenhouse gases emitted by energy production installations which it manages. allocated and new allocation procedures.

In this respect,context, the Group received,(primarily the Energy Services Division) was allocated free of charge by the different States of the European Union, a certain number of free emission allowancesrights (EUA) for thean initial period 2005-2007 (EUA I) and must satisfy annual obligationsthen for a second period 2008-2012 (EUA II). The actual emissions position is determined each year and the corresponding rights surrendered. The Group then purchases or sells emission rights, depending on whether actual emissions are greater or lesser than emission rights allocated.



F-29



Back to surrender allowances equal to total actual emissions.Contents


In the absence of specific IFRS provisions, the Group has adopted the “net liability approach”.

This approach, which involves the recognition of a liability at the period-end if actual emissions exceed allowances held, in accordance with IAS 37 principles, corresponding to amounts that will have to be disbursed to meet surrender obligations 37.

Allowances are managed as a production cost and, in this respect, are recognized in inventories:

at nil value, when they are received free of charge,

at acquisition cost, if purchased for valuable consideration on the endmarket.

Consumption of the three-year period, shouldthis inventory is recognized on a weighted-average unit cost basis.

Transactions in these allowances be insufficient to cover actual emissions during the period.

The liability is assessed basedperformed on  emissions during the period, allowances held and the market price at the period end (or the forward price in the case of forward purchases). This liability is subsequently reversed when surrender obligations are satisfied and purchases of emission allowances are recorded in operating expenses.

Emission allowances are considered to be intangible assets satisfying IAS 38 criteria. Allowances received are treated on grant as entitlement to repayment of a commitment received for nil consideration.  They are recorded as intangible assets with nil value.

Allowances purchased on the market for resale on the market are recorded as intangible assets at acquisition cost. An impairment losses is recognizedmarket value at the period end if the marketperiod-end. Fair value is less than the acquisition cost.

Allowance purchase/salegains and losses on financial instruments relating to these forward transactions are then recognized accordingin other comprehensive income or net income depending on whether they qualify as cash flow hedges in accordance with IAS 39.

1.26

Segment reporting

Since January 1, 2009, the Group identifies and presents segment reporting in accordance with IFRS 8,Operating Segments.

This information is taken from the internal organization of Group activities and corresponds to the management policy chosenfour Group businesses (which were used for these allowances.

Where excess allowances are held, proceeds on disposal are recorded as a reduction in cost of sales.


1.25

Segmentprimary reporting (IASpurposes under the former segment reporting standard, IAS 14)

Pursuant to IAS 14, Veolia Environnement provides primary information by business segment and secondary information by geographical area. The business segments are: Water, Waste Management,Environmental Services, Energy Services and Transportation.


The quantified indicators presented by operating segment form part of the key ratios used for budget validation, operating segment performance measurement and resource allocation reviewed by Executive Management.

Financial information by operating segment is prepared in accordance with the same rules used to prepare the Consolidated Financial Statements.

1.27

Fair value determination principles

The fair value of all financial assets and liabilities is determined at the period-end, either for recognition in the accounts or disclosure in the notes to the financial statements (see Note 27).

Fair value is determined:

i.

based on quoted prices in an active market, or

ii.

 using internal valuation techniques involving standard mathematical calculation methods integrating observable market data (forward rates, interest rate curves, etc.). Valuations produced by these models are adjusted to take account of a reasonable change in the credit risk of Veolia Group or the counterparty or

iii.

using internal valuation techniques integrating parameters estimated by the Group in the absence of observable market data.

Quoted prices in an active market

When quoted prices in an active market are available they are adopted in priority for the determination of the market value. Marketable securities and certain quoted bond issues are valued in this way.

Fair values determined using models integrating observable market data

The majority of derivative instruments (swaps, caps, floors, etc.) are traded over the counter and, as such, there are no quoted prices. Valuations are therefore determined using models commonly used by market participants to value such financial instruments.

Valuations calculated internally in respect of derivative instruments are tested every six months for consistency with valuations issued by our counterparties.



F-30



Back to contentsContents



1.26The fair value of unquoted borrowings is calculated by discounting contractual flows at the market rate of interest.

StandardsThe net carrying amount of receivables and interpretations not adopted earlypayables falling due within less than one year and certain floating-rate receivables and payables is considered a reasonable estimate of their fair value, due to the short payment and settlement periods applied by the Veolia Group.

Veolia Environnement has not elected for early adoptionThe fair value of fixed-rate loans and receivables depends on movements in interest rates and the credit risk of the following standards and interpretations:counterparty.

·Valuations produced by these models are adjusted to take account of changes in Veolia Group credit risk.

IFRS 7,Financial instruments: DisclosuresFair values determined using models integrating certain non-observable data and the amendment to IAS 1,Presentation of financial statements: Capital disclosures, is applicable to the Group from January 1, 2007.  

Adoption of these two texts will resultDerivative instruments valued using internal models integrating certain non-observable data include certain electricity derivative instruments for which there are no quoted prices in additional financial instrument disclosures. The Group is currently assessing the practical consequences of these two texts and does not expect their implementation to have a material impact.

·

IFRS 8,Operating segments: adoption by the European Union is scheduledan active market (notably for May/June 2007. This standard is applicable to the Group from January 1, 2009.

Veolia Environnement is currently assessing the practical consequences of this standard.

·

IFRIC 7,Applying the restatement approach under IAS 29 – Financial reportingelectricity purchase options with extremely long maturity) or observable market data (forward prices for component materials, interest-rate curves, etc.), in hyperinflationary economies:this interpretation is applicable to the Group from January 1, 2007.

Veolia Environnement does not expect implementation of this interpretation to have a material impact.

·

IFRIC 8,Scope of IFRS 2 – Share-based payment:  application of this interpretation by Veolia Environnement is mandatory from January 1, 2007.

Veolia Environnement does not expect implementation of this interpretation to have a material impact.

·

IFRIC 9,Reassessment of embedded derivatives, is applicable to the Group from January 1, 2007.

Veolia Environnement does not expect implementation of this interpretation to have a material impact.

·

IFRIC 10,Interim financial reporting and impairment:  adoption by the European Union is scheduledparticular for May/June 2007. This interpretation is applicable to the Group from January 1, 2007.

Veolia Environnement does not expect implementation of this interpretation to have a material impact.

·

IFRIC 11,IFRS2 – Group and treasury share transactions: adoption by the European Union is scheduled for May/June 2007. This interpretation is applicable to the Group from January 1, 2008.

Veolia Environnement does not expect implementation of this interpretation to have a material impact.


distant maturities

NoteNOTE 2

Use of management estimates in the application of Groupgroup accounting standards

The preparation of financial statements requires managementVeolia Environnement may be required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Future results could differ significantlymay be different from these estimates.

Underlying estimates and assumptions are determined based on past experience and other factors considered as reasonable given the circumstances. They act as a basis for making judgments necessary to the determination of the carrying amount of assets and liabilities, which cannot be obtained directly from other sources. Future values could differ from these estimates.

Underlying estimates and assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. The impact of changes in accounting estimates is recognized in the period the change is made if it affects this period only and in the period the change is made and subsequentprior periods if they are also affected by the change.

Notes 1.91.10 and 4 on goodwill and business combinations present the method adopted for the allocation of the purchase price on business combinations. This allocation is based on future cash flow assumptions and discount rates.

Notes 1.10,1.11, 4 and 6 concern goodwill and non-current asset impairment tests. Group management performed tests based on best forecasts of thediscounted future valuecash flows of the activities of the cash generatingcash-generating units concernedconcerned. Sensitivity analyses were also performed on invested capital values and taking into account discount rates.are presented in the aforementioned notes.

Note 321.15 describes the principles adopted for the determination of financial instrument fair values.

Note 28 on derivative instruments describes the accounting treatment of suchderivative instruments. Veolia Environnement valued these derivative instruments, allocated them and tested their effectiveness where necessary.

Notes 1816 and 3430 on provisions and employee commitments detail the provisions recognized by Veolia Environnement. Veolia Environnement determined these provisions based on best estimates of these obligations.

Note 2722 on the income tax expense presents the tax position of the Group and is notablyprimarily based in France and in the United States on best estimates available to the Group of trends in future tax results.

All these estimates are based on organized procedures for the collection of forecast information on future flows, validated by operating management, and on expected market data based on external indicators and used in accordance with consistent and documented methodologies.



F-31



Back to Contents


The calculation methodology for discount rates adopted as of December 31, 2008 was analyzed with respect to the financial crisis. Following the stabilization of the financial context in 2009, these rates were analyzed again taking account of current conditions and using the following procedures:

Application of IAS 36,Impairment of assets: in accordance with Group practice, the discount rates used correspond to the weighted-average cost of capital, calculated annually at the end of the first half-year. A review of these rates as of December 31, 2009 did not call into question this practice.

Application of IAS 37,Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets: the discount rates used consist of a risk-free interest rate and a risk premium specific to the underlying assets and liabilities. The adjustment applied to this risk premium in December 2008 to limit market volatility in this period, was not considered necessary at the 2009 year-end

Application of IAS 19,Employee Benefits: the exclusive use of market indices and, in particular, the iboxx index in those countries where this index exists, was suspended as of December 31, 2008 due to the highly volatile nature of these indices. Commitments were once again measured using a range of market indices and, in particular the iboxx index, at the December 31, 2009 year-end.

NoteNOTE 3

Significant events


As was the case in the second half of 2008, 2009 was marked by the financial crisis and its economic repercussions, and specifically:




Back

significant exchange rate fluctuations, which modified the contribution of businesses from outside the euro zone, particularly in Eastern Europe and on the U.S. dollar;

 the downward trend in energy prices and CO2 emission rights;

the fall, followed by the stagnation or rise in the price of certain recycled raw materials (particularly paper and cardboard) ;

the slowdown in activity, affecting volumes in the Environmental Services business lines, and, to contents


a lesser extent, new orders in construction business in the Water and Energy Services Divisions;


Acquisitionthe difficult financial situation of Cleanawayindustry economic players and, to a lesser extent, public players which weighed on the performance of certain growth projects and the solvency of some customers.

On September 28, 2006,The first signs of stabilization of the Waste Management Division purchased Cleanaway Holdings Limited foreconomic environment began to appear, nonetheless, during the second half of 2009.

In accordance with the decision of the May 7, 2009 Shareholders’ General Meeting, the Group offered its shareholders a considerationshare or cash option with respect to the dividend payment. The share payment option was adopted by 58% of €745shareholders, resulting in the creation of 20.1 million (for further information, see Note 35). This company isshares representing a UK operator in municipallittle over 4.25% of the share capital and industrial waste collection and integrated waste management services. Annual revenue is estimated at €684 million.4.39% of the voting rights.


AcquisitionAs part of SNCM

On May 31, 2006,the refinancing of its EMTN program, Veolia Environnement Butler Capital Partnerscarried out three bond issues: a €1,250 million bond issue, bearing annual interest at a fixed rate of 5.25% and CGMF signed agreementsmaturing on April 24, 2014, a €750 million bond issue, bearing annual interest at a fixed rate of 6.75% and maturing on April 24, 2019, and a €250 million bond issue, bearing annual interest at a fixed rate of 5.70% and maturing in June 29, 2017.

The Group continued its strategic development and discussions with Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations aimed at combining its Transportation activities with Transdev in accordance with the takeoverproposal announced at the beginning of Société Nationale Maritime Corse MéditerranéAugust 2009. In December 2009, Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations and Veolia Environnement reached a framework agreement for the combination, which primarily covers the financial structure of the new group, with a view to signature of a final agreement in 2010, contingent on receipt of the necessary competition authorizations. The proposed combination of Veolia Transport and Transdev would be carried out by way of the contribution of Veolia Transport and Transdev to a new entity, held 50% by Veolia Environnement, acting as the industrial operator so as to retain transportation as a key component of its environmental services, and 50% by Caiss e (SNCM).des Dépôts et Consignations, acting as long-term strategic shareholder. These agreementsdiscussions form part of the planned future listing of the Group’s Transportation business.



F-32



Back to Contents


As part of its divestiture program, the Group performed the following divestitures in 2009:

On June 24, 2009, the Environmental Services Division announced that it had entered into exclusive discussions with TFN Group with respect to the sale of Veolia Propreté Nettoyage et Multiservices (VPNM). The sale was completed on August, 26, 2009 for an enterprise value of €111 million.

On July 6, 2009, Environmental Services Division announced the signature of an agreement relating to the sale of the U.S. waste-to-energy activity (Montenay International); the partial privatization operation decided bysale of activities provided for in the French governmentagreement was completed in August 2009 for an enterprise value of €220 million.

On August 12, 2009 Dalkia announced the signature of an agreement for the sale of its Facilities Management activities in the United Kingdom for a total amount of €90 million (Group share) as of December 31, 2009.

On December 1, 2009 Veolia Environnement announced the completion of the sale of Veolia Cargo to Transport Ferroviaire Holding (SNCF Group) for its activities in Germany, the Netherlands and Italy and to Europorte (Eurotunnel group) for its activities in France. The divestiture of Veolia Cargo at its enterprise value amounted to €94 million.

On November 9, 2009, the beginningGroup announced the signature of 2005,a partnership between Dalkia and CEZ, the number-one electricity producer in the Czech Republic, to develop an industrial cooperation and potentially leading to asset transfers. As a first step, CEZ acquired 15% of Dalkia Czech Republic for €123 million (100% value), subject to obtaining the necessary competition authorizations. This transaction had not been completed as of December 31, 2009.

On December 22, 2009, Veolia Eau reviewed certain economic aspects (financial restructuring) and the plangovernance rules of its partnership with Mubadala Development Company in our operating activities in North Africa and the Middle East. This transaction resulted in a €189 million reduction in Group debt as of December 31, 2009.

In the fourth quarter of 2009, the Group finalized the sale of a minority interest in Compagnie Méridionale de Navigation for €45 million.

Finally, in December 2009 the EBRD acquired an additional 6.88% interest in Veolia Voda (through a reserved share capital increase), the entity grouping together all Water Division operating activities in Central Europe, for €70 million.

- The Group is currently in exclusive discussions with RATP for the sale of its Transportation activities in the United Kingdom (corresponding to turn the company around, based notably on the prior recapitalizationan autonomous cash-generating unit), Switzerland and a limited number of contracts in France, as part of the companycombination with Transdev, in accordance with the proposal announced in August 2009. Activities in the United Kingdom were reclassified in discontinued operations in the Group financial statements as of December 31, 2009.

- Finally, the Group decided to sell its Renewable Energies activities in the Energy Services Division during 2010. These activities represent a largely independent uniform unit (“cash-generating unit”) as defined by IFRS 5 and have therefore been classified in discontinued operations in the French State.  The transaction was completed contingent to a cancellation clause covering approval by the European CommissionGroup financial statements as of the State aide and the awarding of the public service license for Marseille-Corsica crossings. Veolia Environnement holds 28.29% of the share capital of this company.  This transaction significantly strengthens the Transportation Division’s position as an operator of ferry services, which it has been developing over recent years in high-growth markets in northern Europe. This transac tion represents an investment of €72.2 million (for further information, see Note 35).


December 31, 2009.

Note

F-33



Back to Contents


NOTE 4

Goodwill


Goodwill breaks down as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31,2008

As of
December 31,2007

Gross

7,104.9

7,211.2

7,013.3

Impairment losses

(480.3)

(487.9)

(100.1)

Net

6,624.6

6,723.3

6,913.2


(€ millions)

As of December
31, 2006

As of December
31,2005 adjusted

As of December
31,2004 adjusted

Gross

5,799.6

4,834.1

4,318.6

Impairment losses

(94.6)

(81.8)

(71.8)

Net

5,705.0

4,752.3

4,246.8

The main goodwill balances in net carrying amount by cash-generating unit (amounts in excess of €100 million as of December 31, 2009) are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31,2008

As of
December 31,2007

Water - Distribution France

743.3

743.2

760.5

Environmental Services – United Kingdom

690.0

644.3

824.2

Environmental Services North America Solid Waste

591.3

610.8

567.8

Environmental Services - Germany

402.1

397.8

748.2

Dalkia France

337.8

338.5

342.8

Water Solutions & Technologies

280.3

245.8

206.1

Water – China

240.4

247.5

145.7

Environmental Services France Solid Waste

238.5

272.4

150.0

Water – United Kingdom

222.7

197.4

245.3

Water – Czech Republic

219.1

216.4

220.6

Dalkia Italy

185.2

184.9

139.9

Transportation - United States

165.5

175.3

137.0

Energy Services – United States

147.4

152.6

139.6

Transportation – Passenger services France

143.7

136.2

117.7

Water Germany (excl. Berlin)

137.7

137.7

138.8

Water – Berlin

134.4

134.4

134.4

Veolia Energy Services – Poland

114.5

111.5

71.7

Transportation Sweden, Norway, Finland

114.4

104.8

124.5

Environmental Services - Marius Pedersen

102.2

100.9

90.0

Goodwill balances > €100 million as of December 31, 2009

5,210.5

5,152.4

5,308.4

Goodwill balances < €100 million

1,414.1

1,570.9

1,608.4

Goodwill

6,624.6

6,723.3

6,913.2


Goodwill balances of less than €100 million break down by division as follows:

Goodwill balances < €100 million

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31,2008

As of
December 31,2007

Water

275.5

325.3

357.0

Environmental Services

654.2

710.5

669.1

Energy Services

362.9

343.6

404.1

Transportation

114.0

135.0

177.5

Other

7.5

56.5

0.7

Total

1,414.1

1,570.9

1,608.4


As of December 31, 2006,2009, accumulated impairment losses totaled €480.3 million and mainly concernconcerned the Environmental Services Division in Germany (€343 million) and the Transportation Division activitiesin the Netherlands and Belgium (€38 million) and in Scandinavia (€70 million64 million).

No material impairment losses were recognized in 2004).the Group financial statements as of December 31, 2009.



F-34



Back to Contents


Movements in the net carrying amount of goodwill by division during2006:are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December 31,
2008

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign
exchange
translation

Impairment
losses

Other

As of
December 31,
2009

Water

2,247.7

10.0

14.4

 

(18.8)

2,253.3

Environmental Services

2,736.7

(84.1)

49.2

 

(23.4)

2,678.4

Energy Services

1,131.1

12.8

5.0

(1.0)

-

1,147.9

Transportation

551.3

(16.5)

11.6

(5.5)

(3.3)

537.6

Other

56.5

(16.3)

(0.6)

-

(32.2)

7.4

Goodwill

6,723.3

(94.1)

79.6

(6.5)

(77.7)

6,624.6


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Impairment losses and negative goodwill

Impact of divestments

Other

As of December 31, 2006

Water

1,941.6

75.2

(12.5)

8.4

-

15.9

2,028.6

Waste Management

1,527.7

840.9

(67.0)

-

(1.8)

(5.8)

2,294.0

Energy Services

836.3

36.9

0.6

0.8

-

(35.4)

839.2

Transportation

446.7

122.2

(10.4)

(6.8)

-

(8.5)

543.2

Goodwill

4,752.3

1,075.2

(89.3)

2.4

(1.8)

(33.8)

5,705.0

Changes in theconsolidation scope primarily concernedconcern divestitures in 2009 (Dalkia UK in the following acquisitions:

·

Waste management: Cleanaway (United Kingdom) for €759.7 million and Biffa Belgium for €32.5 million;

·

Transportation: Supershuttle International (United States) for €69.9 million and Shuttleport (United States) for €17.5 million;

·

Water:Banska Bystrica STVPS (Slovakia) for €25.7 million and Poprad PVPS (Slovakia) for €10.2 million;

·

Energy Services Division, VPNM in Italy for €28.3 million.the Environmental Services Division and Freight activities in the Transportation Division) and the acquisition of Digismart in the Energy Services Division.

The main acquisitions of the year are presented in Note 31, “Main acquisitions”, and the divestitures are presented in Note 24, “Net income from discontinued operations”.

No material amendments were made to the opening balance sheets of 2008 acquisitions, including Tianjin Shibei WCO, Bartin Recycling and Praterm. The 12-month periods commencing the acquisition dates during which the Group can finalize the accounting recognition of the business combinations, pursuant to IFRS 3, had expired as of December 31, 2009.

Foreign exchange translationstranslation gains and losses are mainlyprimarily due to the resultdepreciation of the fall inU.S. dollar and the US dollarappreciation of the pound sterling against the euro (-€112 million).

Impairment losses total -€10.1 million and include impairment of goodwill of the Germany Transportation CGU of  -€7.3 million and purchase price allocation corrections of -€2.8 million in the Germany Water CGU.Negative goodwill recognized in the Income Statement totaled €12.5 million, including €11.2 million for the Water Division.

Other movements mainly concern the definitive allocation of the ZEC Lodz purchase price (Energy Services in Poland) in the amount of -€3437.2 million and €65.5 million respectively.

Other movements primarily consist of the Weir Techna purchase price (Water Engineering)reclassification of goodwill to “Assets classified as held for sale” in the amount of €14.1 million.  Due to-€77.7 million, primarily in the limited impact,Environmental Services Division, the 2005 financial statements have not been adjusted.Renewable Energies sector and certain French subsidiaries under joint control in the Water Division.

Impairment tests as of December 31, 2006:2009:

Veolia Environnement performs systematic annual impairment tests in respect of goodwill and other intangible assets with an indefinite useful life. More frequent tests are performed where there is indication of decreaseloss in value.




Back to contents



The recoverable value of a cash generating unit (CGU) is estimated by discounting future cash flows. The main assumptions on which the value in useaccordance with the procedures set out in Note 1.11.

Veolia Environnement Group has 147 cash-generating units as of a cash generating unit is based are the discount rate and trends in volumes, prices and direct costs (inflation) over the period.

Discount rates are estimated by management for each cash generating unit and reflect current market assessments of the time value of money and the specific risks to which the cash generating unit is exposed. Trends in volumes, prices and direct costs are based on past trends and the future market outlook.

Systematic impairment tests are based on future cash flows taken, for the first five years, from the long-term planning process in June 2006. Cash flows for years 6 to 15 are based on year 6 cash flows (taken from the long-term planning document) adjusted by an appropriate growth rate (1% to 3% on average in 2006, depending on the business). The terminal value is then calculated by discounting year 16 data at the perpetual growth rate, including only an organic growth rate such as inflation (0.5% to 3% on average in 2006, depending on the business).December 31, 2009.

Discount rates used in 20062009 reflect both the business and the country or geographical area of the businesscash-generating unit, in accordance with the criteria set out in Notes 1.11 and 2. The discount rates for the main geographical areas in 2009 were as follows:

• France:

6.8%

• United Kingdom:

7.0%

• United States:

6.8%

• China:

8.4%

• Germany:

6.8%

  


Similarly, perpetual growth rates used in 2009 to determine terminal values reflect the country or geographical area of the cash-generating unit, in accordance with the criteria set out in Notes 1.11. Average perpetual growth rates for the main geographical areas in 2009 were as follows:

• France:

1.5%

• United Kingdom:

1.7%

• United States:

2.1%

• China:

1.9%

• Germany:

1.5%

  




F-35



Back to Contents


As in 2008 and given the current economic climate, impairment tests were performed based on the criteria disclosed2010 budget for all Group cash-generating units: the reduction in Note 1.10. The main average discount rates by geographical areacash flows in 2006 were as follows, depending on the nature2010 budget prepared at the end of 2009, of over 10% compared with 2010 figures in the risk.


• France:

4.84% to 8.84%

• United Kingdom:

5.72% to 7.72%

• United States:

6.49% to 9.09%

• Czech Republic:

5.18% to 5.74%

• Germany:

4.84% to 7.12%

As of December 31, 2005, impairment losses of €14.7 million were recognized in respect of two CGUs.

As of December 31, 2006, an impairment of €7.3 million was recorded in respect of the Germany Transportation CGU, representing the entire goodwill balance. Difficulties with the start-up of the rail contract in Germanylong-term plan, led the Group to review its business plans for two cash-generating units – Italy in the Energy Services Division and Spain in the Transportation Division to recognize a provision for losses to completion in respect of the contract of €60 million (see Note 18) and an impairment in respect of the engine shed relating to contract operation of €18.4 million (see Note 7).  Subsequently, impairmentDivision.

Impairment tests on the Germany Transportation CGU leddid not lead to the impairmentrecognition of any material impairments of goodwill in full of the goodwill balance of €7.3 million, based on forecast future flows.  Impairment tests assume a discount rate of 6.28% and a perpetual growth rate of 2%.2009.

Sensitivity of impairment tests:

A sensitivity analysis was performed on impairment tests, assuming a 1% increase in the discount rate and a 1% decrease in the perpetual growth rate.

A 1% increase in the discount rate would generate recoverable values for invested capital below the net carrying amount of certain cash generatingcash-generating units. This reduction would be around €240 million.approximately -€291 million (including -€129 million for the “Energy Services - United States” cash-generating unit, -€62 million for the “Dalkia - Italy” cash-generating unit and -€31 million for the “Environmental Services – Italy” cash-generating unit).

A 1% decrease in perpetual growth rates when they are in excess of 2% would generate recoverable values for invested capital below the net carrying amount of certain cash generatingcash-generating units. . This reduction would be around €55 million.approximately -€237 million (including -€106 million for the “Energy Services - United States” cash-generating unit, -€43 million for the “Dalkia - Italy” cash-generating unit and -€24 million for the “Environmental Services – Italy” cash-generating unit).

Given their specific contractual terms and conditions and the inclusion of interest rate levels in the price determination calculation, the United Kingdom Water and Berlin Water CGUs were excluded from the sensitivity analysis.


Reminder:Recap: Movements in the net carrying amount of goodwill by division during 2005:2008 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December 31,
2007

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Impairment losses

Other

As of
December 31, 2008

Water

2,208.2

140.9

(42.6)

-

(58.8)

2,247.7

Environmental Services

3,049.5

211.3

(182.4)

(343.0)

1.3

2,736.7

Energy Services

1,098.1

58.4

(25.4)

-

-

1,131.1

Transportation

556.7

67.2

(17.5)

(55.3)

0.2

551.3

Other

0.7

53.2

2.6

-

-

56.5

Goodwill

6,913.2

531.0

(265.3)

(398.3)

(57.3)

6,723.3



(€ millions)

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Impairment losses and negative goodwill

Impact of divestments

Other

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

Water

1,778.1

149.6

20.0

5.5

-

(11.6)

1,941.6

Waste Management

1,403.6

17.5

117.1

(10.0)

-

(0.5)

1,527.7

Energy Services

762.9

69.5

0.9

(3.0)

(20.8)

26.8

836.3

Transportation

302.2

124.8

2.5

0.3

-

16.9

446.7

Goodwill

4,246.8

361.4

140.5

(7.2)

(20.8)

31.6

4,752.3

ChangesIn2008,changes in consolidation scope in 2005 mainly primarily concerned the following acquisitions and disposals:

Water: Acquisition of Biothane Group (Netherlands and USA) for €42.7 million, acquisition of the water services company serving the citya joint investment in Tianjin Shibei WCO (China) for €37.7 million.

Environmental Services: Acquisition of Braunschweig in Germany (+€76 million)Bartin Recycling Group (France) for €121.6 million.

Energy Services:

-

Acquisition of Praterm Group (Poland) for €51.3 million and Weir Techna in the United Kingdom (+€39 million) in the Water Division,GEFI and Emicom within Siram Spa (Italy) for €44.9 million,

-

Divestiture of the company carrying the Lodz contract in Poland (+€56 million) in the Energy Services DivisionClemessy and Crystal activities for -€76.6 million.

Transportation: Acquisition of ATC VancomRail4Chem (Germany) for €15.6 million and various companies in the United States (+€59 million),for €23.5 million.

Other: Acquisition of Eurolines in France (minority interest buyoutRidgeline (United States) for €16 million), of Helgelandske in Norway (+€14 million) and of Sodeli in France (+€10 million) in the Transportation Division.€45.0 million;

Foreign exchange translations were mainly the result of the appreciation of the US dollar against the euro (+€131 million).

Impairment losses totaled €14.7 million and negative goodwill +€7.5 million.  F-36

The sale of nuclear maintenance activities and the Facility Management business in Germany led


Back to the removal of goodwill of €14.0 million and €6.8 million respectively within the Energy Services Division.

Other movements mainly consisted of the offsetting entry to the recognition of put options held by minority interests in Poland in the Energy Services Division for +€25 million.Contents





Back to contents



Reminder: Movements in the net carrying amount of goodwill by division during 2004:


(€ millions)

As of January 1,2004 adjusted

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Impairment losses and negative goodwill

Other

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Water

1,741.0

31.7

(11.6)

-

17.0

1,778.1

Waste Management

1,409.0

26.0

(49.6)

-

18.2

1,403.6

Energy Services

747.1

33.6

-

(1.8)

(16.0)

762.9

Transportation

366.8

9.4

(0.6)

(68.3)

(5.1)

302.2

Goodwill

4,263.9

100.7

(61.8)

(70.1)

14.1

4,246.8

The changes in consolidation scope are mainly related to the acquisitions of the company holding the Shenzhen contract (for €36.6 million), Wabag Gmbh in Germany (for €13.3 million), the company holding the Zlinska contract in the Czech Republic (for €11.0 million) in Water segment and of Dalkia Poznan (for €26.6 million) in Energy segment.

Foreign exchange translation adjustmentsgains losses are mainlyprimarily due to the resultdepreciation of the depreciationpound sterling and the appreciation of the U.S. dollar against the euro.euro in the amount of -€272.2 million and €62.2 million respectively.

In 2004, we impaired goodwillsImpairment losses recognized in 2008 total -€398.3 million and include -€343.0 million in respect of Nordic countries Cash Generating Units of Transportation division.  The impairment results from poor performance of a railway contract in Sweden and the deterioration of the operating performancegoodwill of Danish bus contracts. The new situation led to revise the budgetEnvironmental Services Division Germany cash-generating unit and the long term plans.

The new long term plan led to an-€55.3 million in respect of impairment of the goodwill of €70the Transportation Division “Other European” cash-generating unit, corresponding to activities in the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Belgium.

Other movements primarily consist of the reclassification of the assets of certain French subsidiaries under joint control in the Water Division, to “Assets classified as held for sale” in the amount of -€58.8 million.


NoteNOTE 5

Concession intangible assets

Movements in the net carrying amount of concession intangible assets during2006: 2009 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December 31,
2008

Additions

Disposals

Impairment
losses

Amortization

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign
exchange
translation

Other

As of
December 31,
2009

Concession intangible assets, gross

4,983.9

373.9

(32.6)

-

-

(146.1)

(40.7)

(9.3)

5,129.1

Amortization & impairment losses

(1,346.2)

-

30.8

(14.2)

(243.5)

29.4

3.9

35.5

(1,504.3)

Concession intangible assets, net

3,637.7

373.9

(1.8)

(14.2)

(243.5)

(116.7)

(36.8)

26.2

3,624.8


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

 

Additions

Disposals

Impairment losses

Amortization

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December
31, 2006

Concession intangible assets, gross

3,202.0

296.5

(13.1)

-

-

127.1

(20.7)

(130.6)

3,461.2

Amortization & impairment losses

(1,110.2)

-

10.3

(7.8)

(139.9)

(0.8)

0.1

132.7

(1,115.6)

Concession intangible assets, net

2,091.8

296.5

(2.8)

(7.8)

(139.9)

126.3

(20.6)

2.1

2,345.6

Additions concern the Water Division in the amount of €231.7€286.4 million, the Waste Management Divisions in the amount of €19.7 million and the Energy Services Division in the amount of €45.2€57.7 million and the Environmental Services Division in the amount of €21.6 million.

Changes in consolidation scope are mainly concern the expansionresult of a change in consolidation method (from full to proportionate consolidation) of the Water Division in North Africa and the Middle East for -€195.6 million and the entry of several entities into the consolidation scope under the Shenzhen contract in the Water Division in China for €41.9 million.

Foreign exchange translation gains and losses are primarily due to the depreciation of the Chinese renminbi yuan and the appreciation of the pound sterling against the euro in the amount of -€46.8 million and €16.8 million respectively.

Other movements primarily consist of the reclassification of non-current operating financial assets following the extension of a concession arrangement in the Water Division in the amount of €126.3€21.1 million (mainlyand the reclassification of the assets of certain French subsidiaries under joint control in China).

Foreign exchange translationsmainly concern the Water Division (-€22 million), followingto “Assets classified as held for sale” in the depreciationamount of the Chinese yuan against the euro.


-€15.4 million.

Concession intangible assets by division break down as follows:


(€ millions)

As of December 31, 2006

Net carrying amount as of December 31,

2005 adjusted

Net carrying amount as of December 31,
2004 adjusted

Gross carrying amount

Amortization & impairment losses

Net carrying amount

As of December 31, 2009

Net carrying
amount as of
December 31,
2008

Net carrying
amount as of
December 31,
2007

(€ million)

Gross carrying
amount

Amortization &
impairment losses

Net carrying
amount

Water

2,454.6

(688.2)

1,766.4

1,533.8

1,098.5

3,787.1

(942.3)

2,844.8

2,892.0

2,336.1

Waste Management

360.7

(95.6)

265.1

252.9

210.7

Environmental Services

429.7

(166.5)

263.2

259.1

242.7

Energy Services

614.0

(321.1)

292.9

286.9

286.1

858.5

(378.5)

480.0

453.6

388.8

Transportation

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Other

31.9

(10.7)

21.2

18.2

14.7

53.8

(17.0)

36.8

33.0

21.6

Concession intangible assets

3,461.2

(1,115.6)

2,345.6

2,091.8

1,610.0

5,129.1

(1,504.3)

3,624.8

3,637.7

2,989.2


Reminder:

F-37



Back to Contents


Recap: Movements in the net carrying amount of concession intangible assets during 2005:  2008 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December 31,
2007

Additions

Disposals

Impairment
losses

Amortization

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign
exchange
translation

Other

As of
December 31,
2008

Concession intangible assets, gross

4,191.9

400.8

(14.9)

-

-

362.8

77.0

(33.7)

4,983.9

Amortization & impairment losses

(1,202.7)

-

14.2

0.5

(200.5)

(13.6)

(2.2)

58 .1

(1,346.2)

Concession intangible assets, net

2,989.2

400.8

(0.7)

0.5

(200.5)

349.2

74.8

24.4

3,637.7


(€ millions)

As of December 31,

2004 adjusted

Additions

Disposals

Impairment losses

Amortization

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December
31,2005 adjusted

Concession intangible assets, gross

2,586.1

290.3

(9.0)

-

-

265.3

13.8

55.5

3,202.0

Amortization & impairment losses

(976.1)

-

4.3

(4.7)

(131.2)

(3.7)

(4.6)

5.8

(1,110.2)

Concession intangible assets, net

1,610.0

290.3

(4.7)

(4.7)

(131.2)

261.6

9.2

61.3

2,091.8

Additionsconcern the Water Division in the amount of €249.0 million, the Energy Services Divisions in the amount of €30.9 million and the Waste Management Division in the amount of €10.4 million.

Disposals concern the Water Division in the amount of €1.4€274.4 million, and the Energy Services DivisionsDivision in the amount of €3.3€96.1 million and the Environmental Services Division in the amount of €26.6 million.

Changes in consolidation scopemainly concern the acquisitionexternal growth of the assets of the water services company serving the town of Braunschweig in Germany,Water Division in the amount of €256.4 million.




Back to contents



€307.9 million (mainly in China, the United Kingdom and France).

Foreign exchange differencestranslation gains mainly concern the Water Division (€7.9 million) and the Waste Management Division (€1.292.3 million), following the appreciation of the U.S. dollar,Chinese renminbi yuan and the depreciation of the pound sterling and the Chinese yuan against the euro.


Reminder: Movements in the net carrying amount of concession intangible assets during 2004:  


(€ millions)

As of December 31,

2003

Additions

Disposals

Amortization

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Concession intangible assets, gross

2,229.9

269.6

(13.3)

4.1

168.9

(22.0)

(51.1)

2,586.1

Amortization & impairment losses

(835.0)

-

2.5

(110.8)

(77.5)

7.5

37.2

(976.1)

Concession intangible assets, net

1,394.9

269.6

(10.8)

(106.7)

91.4

(14.5)

(13.9)

1,610.0


Changes in scope are mainly related to the acquisitionOther movements primarily consist of the Shenzhen contractreclassification of the assets of certain French subsidiaries under joint control in the Water Division.



Division to “Assets classified as held for sale” in the amount of -€11.7 million.

NoteNOTE 6

Other intangible assets

Other intangible assets break down as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31,2008

As of
December 31,2007

Intangible assets with an indefinite useful life, net

70.0

99.5

82.8

Intangible assets with a definite useful life gross

3,271.5

3,203.9

3,168.6

Amortization and impairment losses

(1,903.7)

(1,768.2)

(1,545.0)

Intangible assets with a definite useful life net

1,367.8

1,435.7

1,623.6

Intangible assets, net

1,437.8

1,535.2

1,706.4


Movements in the net carrying amount of other intangible assets during2006: 2009 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December
31,2008

Additions

Disposals

Impairment
losses

Amortization

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign exchange
translation

Other

As of
December
31, 2009

Intangible assets with an indefinite useful life, net

99.5

1.4

(0.0)

(1.1)

-

12.6

(1.7)

(40.7)

70.0

Fees paid to local authorities

576.5

13.8

(0.4)

(1.3)

(58.9)

(13.2)

(3.1)

(11.7)

501.7

Purchased contractual rights

398.9

0.1

(0.0)

(12.5)

(51.6)

(1.4)

3.6

(14.5)

322.6

Purchased software

143.9

45.4

(0.4)

(0.4)

(52.8)

(1.0)

3.1

4.4

142.2

Purchased customer portfolios

78.2

-

-

-

(10.8)

(3.4)

1.3

(0.0)

65.3

Other purchased intangible assets

203.1

18.8

(1.3)

(6.7)

(24.6)

5.7

1.5

(8.5)

188.0

Other internally-developed intangible assets

35.1

56.4

(0.1)

(0.1)

(10.7)

(0.9)

0.2

68.1

148.0

Intangible assets with a definite useful life net

1,435.7

134.5

(2.2)

(21.0)

(209.4)

(14.2)

6.6

37.8

1,367.8

Other intangible assets

1,535.2

135.9

(2.2)

(22.1)

(209.4)

(1.6)

4.9

(2.9)

1,437.8




F-38


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

Additions

Disposals

Amortization

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2006

Fees paid to local authorities

696.8

20.5

(1.1)

(62.2)

-

(5.1)

23.5

672.4

Contractual rights

212.2

-

-

(18.1)

142.4

0.8

40.2

377.5

Purchased software

118.9

46.2

(0.9)

(49.0)

2.0

(0.1)

9.7

126.8

Trademarks

19.2

19.2

(1.2)

(2.3)

(4.5)

(1.6)

(4.3)

24.5

Internally-developed software

3.2

0.9

-

(1.9)

-

-

0.2

2.4

Other internally-developed intangible assets

38.9

7.9

-

(6.5)

0.1

(3.9)

7.3

43.8

Other purchased intangible assets

192.2

22.4

(0.2)

(33.1)

23.3

(3.6)

(68.6)

132.4

Other intangible assets

1,281.4

117.1

(3.4)

(173.1)

163.3

(13.5)

8.0

1,379.8


Other intangibleBack to Contents


Intangible assets transferred to Non-current assets held for sale in 2006 totaled €0.2 million. No amounts were transferred to Non-current assets held for sale in 2004 or 2005.with an indefinite useful life are primarily trademarks.

Fees paid to local authorities in respect of public service contracts totaled €672.4€501.7 million as of December 31, 2006.2009, including €494.8 million for the Water Division. The amortization over the contract term of fees paid at the beginning of concession contracts inarrangements, calculated over the French Water Divisioncontract term, totaled €49.3-€58.9 million in 2006.2009, including -€55.8 million for the Water Division.

ChangesOther movements primarily consist of the reclassification of the assets of the Renewable Energies activity and of certain French subsidiaries under joint control in consolidation scope impacting contractual rights mainly concern Cleanaway United Kingdom (€37.2 million) and acquisitions by the Water Division to “Assets classified as held for sale” in China (€58.7 million) and Slovakia (€40.1 million).the amount of -€29.2 million.


Other intangible assets break down as follows:


(€ millions)

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

Intangible assets with an indefinite useful life, net

34.6

29.7

Intangible assets with a definite useful life, gross

2,749.4

2,490.0

Amortization

(1,404.2)

(1,238.3)

Intangible assets with a definite useful life, net

1,345.2

1,251.7

Intangible assets

1,379.8

1,281.4





Back to contents



Reminder:Recap: Movements in the net carrying amount of other intangible assets during 2005:  2008 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of December 31, 2007

Additions

Disposals

Impairment losses

Amortization

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2008

Intangible assets with an indefinite useful life, net

82.8

34.9

0.1

(0.9)

 

(12.2)

1.6

(6.8)

99.5

Fees paid to local authorities

634.5

8.8

(0.1)

 

(60.8)

(1.5)

11.5

(15.9)

576.5

Purchased contractual rights

595.9

-

-

(62.6)

(71.4)

(8.4)

(9.0)

(45.6)

398.9

Purchased software

131.4

55.1

(0.5)

 

(51.4)

(4.3)

(1.7)

15.3

143.9

Purchased customer portfolios

50.4

0.8

-

 

(13.7)

35.3

4.8

0.6

78.2

Other purchased intangible assets

181.7

31.2

(0.8)

(0.7)

(23.3)

31.0

(6.3)

(9.7)

203.1

Other internally-developed intangible assets

29.7

9.5

(0.2)

 

(6.1)

0.1

(0.2)

2.3

35.1

Intangible assets with a definite useful life net

1,623.6

105.4

(1.6)

(63.3)

(226.7)

52.2

(0.9)

(53.0)

1,435.7

Other intangible assets

1,706.4

140.3

(1.5)

(64.2)

(226.7)

40.0

0.7

(59.8)

1,535.2


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Additions

Disposals

Amortization

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

Fees paid to local authorities

701.0

2.8

(1.0)

(61.9)

4.1

15.9

35.9

696.8

Trademarks

27.8

10.5

(8.0)

(4.9)

2.7

1.4

(10.3)

19.2

Internally-developed software

2.9

0.3

-

(2.3)

-

-

2.3

3.2

Purchased software

121.0

38.3

(2.4)

(49.6)

5.5

0.9

5.2

118.9

Other internally-developed intangible assets

37.8

0.3

-

(0.5)

0.7

5.6

(5.0)

38.9

Other purchased intangible assets

302.0

26.0

5.3

(56.3)

111.1

18.7

(2.4)

404.4

Other intangible assets

1,192.5

78.2

(6.1)

(175.5)

124.1

42.5

25.7

1,281.4

Fees paid to local authorities in respect of public service contracts totaled €576.5 million as of December 31, 2008, including €569.7 million for the Water Division. The increaseamortization of fees paid at the beginning of concession arrangements, calculated over the contract term, totaled €60.8 million in 20052008, including €59.4 million for the Water Division.

Changes in other intangible assets was mainly due to:

-

the impact of entries into the consolidation scope impacting “Purchased customer portfolios” primarily concern external growth in the Water Division for €67 million (mainly Braunschweig for €24(€16.7 million) and the Environmental Services Division (€19.8 million).

Changes in consolidation scope impacting “Other purchased intangible assets” primarily concern acquisitions in the Water Division.

Impairment losses recognized in the year total -€64.2 million and Enel Hydro for €12include -€62.6 million engineering activities in respect of impairment of the United States for €12 million and Acqua Spa for €9 million), inintangible assets of the Transportation Division for €15 million (mainly ATC Vancom in the United States for €12 million), in the EnergyEnvironmental Services Division for €10 million and in the Waste Management Division for €5 million.Germany cash-generating unit.

-

the impactOther movements primarily consist of the buyoutreclassification of minority interests in Acqua Latina in Italythe assets of certain French subsidiaries under joint control in the Water Division to “Assets classified as held for €12sale” in the amount of -€12.4 million.



F-39



Back to Contents


Reminder: Movements in the net carrying amount of other intangible assets during 2004:  


(€ millions)

As of January 1,2004 adjusted

Additions

Disposals

Amortization

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Fees paid to local authorities

660.3

14.9

(3.3)

(48.5)

63.2

(0.7)

15.1

701.0

Trademarks

44.4

12.7

(4.3)

(6.7)

3.7

(2.9)

(19.1)

27.8

Internally-developed software

5.6

0.1

(0.1)

(1.5)

-

-

(1.2)

2.9

Purchased software

108.5

34.8

(18.4)

(26.8)

1.1

0.1

21.7

121.0

Other internally-developed intangible assets

53.9

(0.6)

-

-

0.2

(2.3)

(13.4)

37.8

Other purchased intangible assets

283.8

39.7

5.0

(22.2)

36.9

(7.2)

(34.0)

302.0

Other intangible assets

1,156.5

101.6

(21.1)

(105.7)

105.1

(13.0)

(30.9)

1,192.5



NoteNOTE 7

Property, plant and equipment


Movements in the net carrying amount of property, plant and equipment during2006: 2009 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of December 31, 2008

Additions

Disposals

Impairment losses

Depreciation

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2009

Property, plant and equipment, gross

19,491.5

1,598.7

(823.8)

-

-

(173.1)

315.6

(418.7)

19,990.2

Depreciation and impairment losses

(10,064.4)

-

602.5

(14.2)

(1,362.6)

126.6

(157.5)

261.8

(10,607.8)

Property, plant and equipment, net

9,427.1

1,598.7

(221.3)

(14.2)

(1,362.6)

(46.5)

158.1

(156.9)

9,382.4


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

Additions

Disposals

Impairment losses

Depreciation

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2006

Property, plant and equipment, gross

14,972.9

1,424.5

(635.6)

-

-

1,450.5

(125.0)

(175.3)

16,912.0

Depreciation

(8,087.2)

-

530.4

(60.2)

(1,055.3)

(621.4)

63.0

237.4

(8,993.3)

Property, plant and equipment, net

6,885.7

1,424.5

(105.2)

(60.2)

(1,055.3)

829.1

(62.0)

62.1

7,918.7


Property, plant and equipment of €44.0 million was transferred to Non-current assets feld for sale (vehicles in Denmark and incinerators in United-Kingdom) compared to €1.2 million in 2005.

Additions concern the Water Division in the amount of €322.3€330.4 million, the Waste ManagementEnvironmental Services Division in the amount of €648.0€486.4 million, the Energy Services Division in the amount of €139.7€326.5 million and the Transportation Division in the amount of €290.3€423 million.

Disposals net of impairment losses and depreciation of -€221.3 million, mainly concern the Water Division in the amount of €5.8-€30.2 million, the Waste Management Division in the amount of €41.9 million, the EnergyEnvironmental Services Division in the amount of €11.5-€30.9 million and the Transportation Division in the amount of €43.3 million.

Impairment losses mainly concern the remeasurement at fair value of Transportation Division assets in the amount of €63 million, including €44 million in respect of assets located in Denmark (impairment losses recognized in “Net income (expense) from discontinued operations” in the Income Statement) and an impairment in respect of the engine shed relating to contract operation of €18-€144.1 million.

Changes in consolidation scope mainly concern the Energy Services Division following the acquisition of SNCM byDigismart in Estonia (+€47.3 million) and the Transportation Division (€393 million),following the divestiture of Cleanaway United Kingdom (€223 million) and Biffa Belgium (€27 million) by the Waste Services Division and of companies in China by the Water Division (€24Freight activity (-€124.7 million).




BackForeign exchange translation gains and losses are primarily due to contents



the appreciation of the pound sterling against the euro in the amount of €111.4 million, the appreciation of the Australian dollar against the euro in the amount of €53.3 million and the depreciation of the U.S. dollar against the euro in the amount of -€46.5 million.

Other movements mainly concern the definitive allocationconsist of the ZEC Lodz purchase price (Energy Services in Poland)reclassification of assets, and primarily the assets of Dalkia Usti activities (Czech Republic), to “Assets classified as held for sale” in the amount of €84.5-€175.6 million.


Property, plant and equipment by division break down as follows:


(€ millions)

As of December 31, 2006

Net carrying amount as of December 31,2005 adjusted

Net carrying amount as of December 31,2004 adjusted

Gross carrying amount

Depreciation & impairment losses

Net carrying amount

As of December 31, 2009

Net carrying
amount as of
December 31,
2008

Net carrying
amount as of
December 31,
2007

(€ million)

Gross carrying
amount

Depreciation &
impairment losses

Net carrying
amount

Water

4,296.4

(2,038.2)

2,258.2

2,107.0

1,906.2

4,312.8

(2,182.4)

2,130.4

2,024.4

2,250.9

Waste Management

7,039.4

(3,935.1)

3,104.3

2,821.5

2,528.4

Environmental Services

8,693.7

(5,039.8)

3,653.9

3,838.7

3,638.1

Energy Services

1,988.6

(1,032.7)

955.9

819.4

688.5

3,178.0

(1,269.0)

1,909.0

1,816.6

1,617.3

Transportation

3,443.6

(1,925.0)

1,518.6

1,066.5

984.3

3,549.9

(1,987.9)

1,562.0

1,631.8

1,603.0

Other

144.0

(62.3)

81.7

71.3

66.0

255.8

(128.7)

127.1

115.6

93.9

Property, plant and equipment

16,912.0

(8,993.3)

7,918.7

6,885.7

6,173.4

19,990.2

(10,607.8)

9,382.4

9,427.1

9,203.2


The breakdown of property, plant and equipment by class of assets is as follows:


(€ millions)

As of December 31, 2006

Net carrying amount as of December 31,2005 adjusted

 

Gross carrying amount

Depreciation & impairment losses

Net carrying amount

Land

1,330.7

(484.3)

846.4

784.0

Buildings

2,496.3

(1,184.2)

1,312.1

1,377.0

Technical systems

7,193.8

(3,851.3)

3,342.5

2,877.9

Assets under construction

399.6

(1.6)

398.0

247.7

Publicly-owned utility networks

127.6

(56.2)

71.4

91.8

Other (including vehicles)

5,364.0

(3,415.7)

1,948.3

1,507.3

Property, plant and equipment

16,912.0

(8,993.3)

7,918.7

6,885.7

 

As of December 31, 2009

Net carrying
amount as of
December 31,
2008

Net carrying
amount as of
December 31,
2007

(€ million)

Gross carrying amount

Depreciation & impairment losses

Net carrying
amount

Land

1,513.5

(629.4)

884.1

901.0

859.8

Buildings

3,012.6

(1,392.2)

1,620.4

1,543.9

1,660.3

Technical installations, plant and equipment

7,920.9

(4,192.6)

3,728.3

3,638.9

3,499.8

Traveling systems and other vehicles

4,889.1

(2,950.1)

1,939.0

2,041.3

1,954.0

Other property, plant and equipment

2,077.2

(1,441.0)

636.2

643.5

615.9

Returnable assets

 

 

 

-

6.4

Owned property, plant and equipment in progress

576.9

(2.5)

574.4

657.8

604.0

Property, plant and equipment in progress

0.0

(0.0)

0.0

0.7

3.0

Property, plant and equipment

19,990.2

(10,607.8)

9,382.4

9,427.1

9,203.2


Reminder:

F-40



Back to Contents


Recap: Movements in the net carrying amount of property, plant and equipment during 2005:  2008 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December
31,2007

Additions

Disposals

Impairment
losses

Depreciation

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign
exchange
translation

Other

As of
December
31, 2008

Property, plant and equipment, gross

18,885.9

1,954.6

(726.2)

-

-

353.4

(945.6)

(30.6)

19,491.5

Depreciation

(9,682.7)

-

580.7

(0.3)

(1,272.2)

(84.3)

402.0

(7.6)

(10,064.4)

Property, plant and equipment, net

9,203.2

1,954.6

(145.5)

(0.3)

(1,272.2)

269.1

(543.6)

(38.2)

9,427.1


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Additions

Disposals

Impairment losses

Depreciation

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

Property, plant and equipment, gross

13,424.7

1,106.6

(749.2)

-

-

643.4

533.4

14.0

14,972.9

Depreciation

(7,251.3)

-

605.7

(7.8)

(959.7)

(234.3)

(237.5)

(2.3)

(8,087.2)

Property, plant and equipment, net

6,173.4

1,106.6

(143.5)

(7.8)

(959.7)

409.1

295.9

11.7

6,885.7

Additions concern the Water Division in the amount of €228.9€372.6 million, the Waste ManagementEnvironmental Services Division in the amount of €580€913.7 million, the Energy Services Division in the amount of €97.8€301.9 million and the Transportation Division in the amount of €185.9€324.7 million.

Disposals net of impairment losses and depreciation of -€145.5 million, mainly concern the Water Division in the amount of €44.3-€37.6 million, the Waste Management Division in the amount of €56 million, the EnergyEnvironmental Services Division in the amount of €10.0-€27.0 million and the Transportation Division in the amount of €31.7-€66.3 million.



Changes in consolidation scope


Back to contents



Foreign exchange translations primarily concern the Water Division in the amount of €84.4 million, the Waste Management Division in the amount of €172.2 million, the Energy Services Division in the amount of €24.1 million and the Transportation Division in the amount of €7.7 million, following the appreciation of the U.S. dollar, the pound sterling and the Chinese yuan against the euro.


Reminder: Movements in the net carrying amount of property, plant and equipment during 2004:  


(€ millions)

As of January 1,2004 adjusted

Additions

Disposals

Depreciation

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Property, plant and equipment, gross

12,985.1

1,154.9

(855.7)

-

342.0

(97.2)

(104.4)

13,424.7

Depreciation

(6,742.6)

-

696.0

(1,099.0)

(146.1)

29.9

10.5

(7,251.3)

Property, plant and equipment, net

6,242.5

1,154.9

(159.7)

(1,099.0)

195.9

(67.3)

93.9

6,173.4


Change in scope is mainly related to the acquisition of Dalkia Poznan Zec in the Energy Services Division (€49 million), "Groupe Connex GVI"of the Praterm Group in CanadaPoland (€86.9 million) and in the TransportEnvironmental Services Division of the Bartin Group in France (€1143.4 million).


Foreign exchange translation losses mainly concern the depreciation of the pound sterling against the euro in the Water (-€287.8 million) and Environmental Services (-€155.6 million) Divisions.


Other movements primarily consist of the reclassification of the assets of certain French subsidiaries under joint control in the Water Division to “Assets classified as held for sale” in the amount of -€31.5 million.

Note

F-41



Back to Contents


NOTE 8

Investments in associates


8.1

The principal investments in associates with a value of greater than €10 million as of December 31, 2009 are as follows:

 

As of December 31,

 

% control

Share in equity

Share of net income

 

2009

2008

2007

2009

2008

2007

2009

2008

2007

Fovarosi Csatomazasi Muvek

25.00%

25.00%

25.00%

91.1

92.3

95.7

0.1

1.3

1.0

Regaz (Gaz de Bordeaux)

24.00%

  

23.8

-

-

4.0

-

-

Cie Méridionale de Navigation (2)

 

45.00%

45.00%

-

42.8

34.9

(10.2)

7.9

6.9

Doshion VWS

30.00%

30.00%

 

16.8

15.8

-

0.4

-

-

TIRU

24.00%

24.00%

24.00%

13.0

11.4

13.1

1.1

0.1

0.1

Cie Méridionale de Participations (2)

 

45.00%

45.00%

-

12.5

12.5

(0.0)

-

0.1

Berlinwasser China Holding (BWI)

49.00%

49.00%

 

12.0

6.2

-

0.2

-0.3

-

Stadtereinigung Holtmeyer GmbH

40.00%

40.00%

 

11.9

12.3

-

(0.4)

1.0

-

Stadtreinigung Dresden GmbH (3)

 

49.00%

49.00%

-

10.1

9.6

-

1.3

-

Other amounts < €10 million in 2008 and 2009

   

99.9

108.2

126.3

3.9

7.2

8.8

Investments in associates

   

268.5

311.6

292.1

(0.9)(1)

18.5(1)

16.9(1)


(1)

These amounts include the share of net income of associates realized by Freight and Renewable Energy activities in the process of being sold. Pursuant to IFRS 5, this net income was transferred from “Share of net income of associates” to “Net income from discontinued operations” in the amount of -€2.4 million in 2009, -€1.0 million in 2008 and -€0.2 million in 2007.

(2)

Companies sold in 2009

(3)

Change in consolidation method (from equity accounting to proportionate consolidation)


 

As of December 31,

 

% holding

Share in equity

Share of net income

 

2006

2005

2004

2006

2005

2004

2006

2005

2004

  

adjusted

 

adjusted

 

adjusted

Fovarosi Csatomazasi Muvek

25.00%

25.00%

25.00%

95.4

93.1

94.2

0.8

1.5

1.2

TIRU

24.00%

24.00%

24.00%

13.6

10.7

11.5

2.2

(0.8)

5.1

EED ES Tersege Vizikozmu KFT (1)

20.80%

-

-

5.1

-

-

0.1

-

-

Urban Sanitation (2)

50.00%

49.00%

49.00%

-

13.9

12.1

-

1.3

1.6

CICG

41.97%

41.95%

41.97%

5.9

5.6

5.4

0.3

0.3

0.2

Southern Water investments Limited (3)

-

25.00%

19.90%

-

17.7

11.7

-

(*)

(*)

KVW Investment Co Ltd Hohhot

49.00%

49.00%

-

5.5

5.3

-

0.8

-

-

Shanghai Laogang Landfil

30.00%

30.00%

30.00%

5.5

5.2

4.5

0.6

(0.1)

-

Ta Ho Onyx Yunlin (4)

33.30%

33.30%

33.30%

3.7

-

-

(4.2)

-

-

Cie Méridionale de Participations (5)

45.00%

-

-

12.4

-

-

-

-

-

Cie Méridionale de Navigation (5)

45.00%

-

-

28.0

-

-

5.1

-

-

Other (per unit < €5 million in 2005 and 2006

   

65.9

50.0

79.8

0.3

4.3

13.9

Investments in associates

   

241.0

201.5

219.2

6.0

6.5

22.0


(1)

EED ES Tersege Vizikozmu KFT (Hungary): entry into the Water Division in 2006.

(2)

Change in consolidation method: proportionate consolidation from 2006 following the signature of a new shareholders’ agreement resulting in joint control.

(3)

Sold in 2006.

(4)

Taho Yunlin is equity accounted in 2006 (previously non-consolidated) due to the low probability of completion of the purchase by the partner in the company following the termination of the contract by the County of Yunlin (Taiwan).

(5)

Entry into the scope of consolidation of stakes in CMN and CMP held by SNCM.

(*)

Recorded in Net income (expense) from discontinued operations in the amount of €2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, -€8.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 and €2.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2004.





Back to contents



Movements in investments in associates in20062009: are as follows:

(€ million)

% control
as of
December 31, 2009

2008

Net
income

Dividend
distribution

Foreign
exchange
translation

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Other

2009

Fovarosi Csatomazasi Muvek

25.00%

92.2

0.1

-

(1.2)

-

-

91.1

Cie Méridionale de Navigation

 

42.8

(10.2)

-

-

(32.6)

-

-

Doshion VWS

30.00%

15.8

0.4

-

0.3

0.3

-

16.8

Cie Méridionale de Participations

 

12.5

(0.0)

-

-

(12.5)

-

-

Stadtereinigung Holtmeyer GmbH

40.00%

12.3

(0.4)

-

-

(0.0)

-

11.9

Berlinwasser China Holding(BWI)

49.00%

6.2

0.2

(0.6)

(1.1)

7.3

-

12.0

TIRU

24.00%

11.4

1.1

-

0.5

-

-

13.0

Regaz (Gaz de Bordeaux)

24.00%

-

4.0

-

-

19.8

-

23.8

Stadtreinigung Dresden GmbH

 

10.1

-

-

-

(10.1)

-

-

Other amounts < €10 million in 2008 and 2009

 

108.2

3.9

(5.4)

(0.3)

(4.9)

(1.6)

99.9

Investments in associates

 

311.6

(0.9)

(6.0)

(1.8)

(32.7)

(1.6)

268.5


(€ millions)

% holding as of December 31, 2006

2005 adjusted

Net income

Dividend distribution

Foreign exchange translation

Changes in consolid-ation scope

Other

2006

Favarosi Csatomazasi Muvek

25%

93.1

0.8

-

0.5

-

1.0

95.4

TIRU

24%

10.7

2.2

-

0.7

-

-

13.6

EED ES Tersege Vizikozmu KFT

20.80%

-

0.1

-

-

5.0

-

5.1

Urban Sanitation

50%

13.9

-

-

-

(13.9)

-

-

CICG

41.97%

5.6

0.3

-

-

-

0.0

5.9

Southern Water investments Limited

-

17.7

-(*)

-

-

(17.7)

-

-

KVW Investment Co Ltd

49%

5.3

0.8

-

(0.5)

-

(0.1)

5.5

Shanghai Laogang Landfil

30%

5.2

0.6

-

(0.4)

-

0.1

5.5

Ta Ho Onyx Yunlin

33.30%

-

(4.2)

-

(2.4)

10.4

(0.1)

3.7

Cie Méridionale de Participations

45%

-

-

-

-

12.5

(0.1)

12.4

Cie Meridionale de Navigation

45%

-

5.1

-

-

22.9

-

28.0

Other (per unit < €5 million in 2005 and 2006

 

50.0

0.3

(4.1)

(2.1)

14.9

6.9

65.9

Investments in associates

 

201.5

6.0

(4.1)

(4.2)

34.1

7.7

241.0

(*)Recorded in Net income (expense) from discontinued operations in the amount of €2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.

No material amounts were transferred to Non-current assets feldAssets classified as held for sale in 2004, 20052007, 2008 or 2006.2009



F-42



The decrease in 2006 of components of balance sheet and consolidated income statement results from the disposal of Southern Water Investments Limited.Back to Contents


Summarized financial information for the main investments in associates is as follows (100% of amounts):


(€ millions)

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

(€ million)

As of December 31, 2009

As of December 31,2008

As of December 31,2007

Non-current assets

848.6

4,872.7

4,992.1

767.6

696.1

870.8

Current assets

256.7

1,414.4

2,005.1

438.2

328.1

310.4

Total assets

1,105.3

6,287.1

6,997.2

1,205.8

1,024.2

1,181.2

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

586.3

524.0

696.8

Minority interests

1.0

1.4

6.8

Equity attributable to owners of the Company

581.5

559.4

618.7

Equity attributable to non-controlling interests

14.5

(1.1)

0.8

Non-current liabilities

263.1

4,735.8

5,046.0

223.3

244.2

325.2

Current liabilities

254.9

1,025.9

1,247.6

386.5

221.7

236.5

Total equity and liabilities

1,105.3

6,287.1

6,997.2

1,205.8

1,024.2

1,181.2

Consolidated Income Statement

     

Revenue

329.5

1,085.5

1,449.0

431.4

456.5

377.6

Operating income

37.2

355.6

373.1

25.8

52.6

31.6

Net income for the year

24.6

37.1

53.2

7.1

34.7

14.9





Back to contents



Reminder:Recap: Movements in investments in associates during 2005:2008 are as follows:

(€ million)

% control as of
December 31, 2008

2007

Net
income

Dividend
distribution

Foreign
exchange
translation

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Other

2008

Fovarosi Csatomazasi Muvek

25.00%

95.7

1.3

-

(4.7)

-

-

92.3

Cie Méridionale de Navigation

45.00%

34.9

7.9

-

-

-

-

42.8

Doshion VWS

30.00%

   

(0.1)

15.9

-

15.8

Cie Méridionale de Participations

45.00%

12.5

-

-

-

-

-

12.5

Stadtereinigung Holtmeyer GmbH

40.00%

-

1.0

-

-

11.3

-

12.3

TIRU

24.00%

13.1

0.1

-

(0.8)

-

(1.0)

11.4

Stadtreinigung Dresden GmbH

49.00%

9.6

1.3

(1.0)

-

2.5

(2.3)

10.1

Other amounts < €10 million in 2007 and 2008

 

126.3

6.9

(6.4)

1.6

(9.5)

(4.5)

114.4

Investments in associates

 

292.1

18.5(1)

(7.4)

(4.0)

20.2

(7.8)

311.6




F-43


(€ millions)

% holding as of December 31, 2005

2004 adjusted

Net income

Dividend distribution

Foreign exchange translation

Changes in consolidation scope

Other

2005 adjusted

Domino

-

15.2

-

-

-

-

(15.2)

-

Fovarosi Csatomazasi Muvek

25.00%

94.2

1.5

-

(2.6)

-

-

93.1

Tiru

24.00%

11.5

(0.8)

-

-

-

-

10.7

Urban Sanitation

49.00%

12.1

1.3

(1.4)

1.9

-

-

13.9

Technoborgo

-

6.5

-

-

-

(6.5)

-

-

CICG

41.95%

5.4

0.3

(0.1)

-

-

-

5.6

PCP Holding

-

10.0

-

-

-

(10.0)

-

-

Southern Water investments Limited

25.00%

11.7

8.4

(5.1)

2.2

3.7

(3.2)

17.7

Other

-

52.6

4.2

(3.7)

0.9

6.4

0.1

60.5

Investments in associates

 

219.2

14.9

(10.3)

2.4

(6.4)

(18.3)

201.5


Back to Contents


Reminder: Movements in investments in associates during 2004:


(€ millions)

% holding as of December 31, 2004

January 1,2004 adjusted

Net income

Dividend distribution

 

Foreign exchange translation

Changes in consolidation scope

Other

2004 adjusted

Domino

15.00%

35.4

(0.2)

-

-

0.9

(20.9)

-

15.2

Intan Utilities Berhad

-

8.2

-

-

-

-

(8.2)

-

-

Fovarosi Csatomazasi Muvek

25.00%

87.0

1.2

-

-

6.0

-

-

94.2

Tiru

24.00%

6.9

5.1

(0.5)

-

-

-

-

11.5

Urban Sanitation

49.00%

12.9

1.6

(1.4)

-

(1.0)

-

-

12.1

Technoborgo

49.00%

7.0

1.5

(1.7)

(0.3)

-

-

-

6.5

CICG

41.97%

5.3

0.2

(0.1)

-

-

-

-

5.4

PCP Holding

19.21%

6.5

3.6

-

-

-

-

(0.1)

10.0

Southern Water investments Limited

19.90%

16.9

2.2

(3.3)

-

-

-

(4.1)

11.7

Other

-

39.8

9.0

(10.6)

-

(3.8)

20.6

(2.4)

52.6

Investments in associates

 

225.9

24.2

(17.6)

(0.3)

2.1

(8.5)

(6.6)

219.2


NoteNOTE 9

Non-consolidated investments


Pursuant to IAS 39, non-consolidated investments are classified as available-for-sale and, as such, recognized at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses are taken directly to equity,other comprehensive income, except for unrealized losses considered long-term which are expensed in the Consolidated Income Statement.


Movements in the fair value of non-consolidated investments during 2006:


(€ millions)

As of December 31,

2005 adjusted

Acquisitions

Disposals

Changes in consolidation scope

Fair value adjustments

Impairment losses

Other

As of
December 31, 2006

Non-consolidated investments

209.5

33.2

(11.9)

(65.7)

0.8

(2.5)

18.3

181.7

Acquisitions mainly concern the acquisition of an additional 8% interest in Gaz de Bordeaux by the Energy Services Division for a consideration of €12.8 million.




Back to contents



The principaldisposal was the sale of Ecofin (United Kingdom) shares held by the Water Division in the amount of -€6.6 million.

Changes in consolidation scope mainly concern the consolidation in 2006 of the company carrying the Hradec Kralove contract (Water Division, Czech Republic) and SEBS (Water Division, Germany) for -€14.8 million and -€27 million respectively and Ta-Ho Yunlin (Waste Management Division, China), for -€10.0 million.

Other movements concern the reclassification of an investment previously recorded in “Other long-term investments”.


Non-consolidated investments break down as follows:


 (€ millions)

% interest as of December 31, 2006

Gross carrying amount as of December 31, 2006

Impairment losses

Fair value adjust-ments

Net carrying amount as of December 31, 2006

Net carrying amount as of December 31,  

2005 adjusted

Net carrying amount as of December 31,
 2004 adjusted

Méditerranea delle Acque (formerly Genova Acque)(1)

17.1%

26.3

-

(0.3)

26.0

25.7

25.6

Avacon (1)

1.3%

25.0

-

-

25.0

-

-

Domino Sanepar (1)

15.0%

20.7

-

-

20.7

20.7

-

Gaz de Bordeaux (1)

24.0%

17.5

-

1.8

19.3

4.6

4.6

SEBS - GmbH (2)

 

-

-

-

-

27.0

-

Hradec Kralove (2)

 

-

-

-

-

14.8

-

Ta-Ho Yunlin (2)

 

-

-

-

-

10.0

10.2

Vodarny (3)

    

-

-

13.1

Rev Suisse (3)

    

-

-

13.2

Other (per unit <€10 million in 2006 and 2005

 

112.4

(21.7)

-

90.7

106.7

114.4

Non-consolidated investments

 

201.9

(21.7)

1.5

181.7

209.5

181.1


(3)

Investment not consolidated as not satisfying the “significant influence” criteria.

(2)

Company consolidated in 2006

(3)

Company consolidated in 2005


Reminder: Movements in non-consolidated investments during 2005:2009 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of

December 31,2008

Additions

Disposals

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Fair value
adjustments

Impairment
losses(1)

Other

As of

December 31,
2009

Non-consolidated investments

202.8

14.0

(8.4)

(46.3)

9.4

(2.5)

5.6

174.6


(1)

Impairment losses are recorded in financial income and expenses.


(€ millions)

As of December 31,  

2004 adjusted

Acquisitions

Disposals

Changes in consolidation scope

Fair value adjustments

Impairment losses

Other

As of December 31,  

2005 adjusted

Non-consolidated investments

181.1

65.3

(18.3)

(35.3)

0.3

(0.8)

17.2

209.5

Acquisitions mainly concern SEBS GmbH (Braunschweig Waste Water Services) and Hradec Kralove for €27.0As of December 31, 2009, no investment line other than Méditerranea delle Acque exceeds €20 million. The value of this line is €36 million as of December 31, 2009, including fair value adjustments of €9.7 million and €14.8 million respectively.

The principal disposal was the sale of Aque Potabili for €17.1 million.percentage interest is 17.1%.

Changes in consolidation scope mainlyprimarily concern the first-time consolidation of Rev Suisse in the amount of €13.2 million and Vodarny Stredoceske in the amount of €13.1 million.Regaz (Gaz de Bordeaux).

Other movements include the reclassification inRecap: non-consolidated investments in 2005 of the Domino Sanepar shares held by Proactiva in the amount of €20.7 million, following the loss of significant influence over this company. Asbreak down as follows as of December 31, 2004, these shares were recognized in investments in associates.2008:

(€ million)

% holding
as of
December 31,
2008

Gross
carrying
amount as of
December
31, 2008

Impairment
losses(2)

Fair value
adjustments

Net
carrying
amount as of
December 31,
2008

Net
carrying
amount as of
December 31,
2007

Méditerranea delle Acque(1)

17.1%

26.3

-

2.0

28.3

55.8

Avacon

-

-

-

-

-

26.6

Domino Sanepar

-

-

-

-

-

20.6

Gaz de Bordeaux(1)

24.0%

17.5

-

11.7

29.2

20.4

Net carrying amount per unit
< €20 million in 2008 and 2007

 

163.2

(19.7)

1.8

145.3

132.7

Non-consolidated investments

 

207.0

(19.7)

15.5

202.8

256.1


(1)

Investment not consolidated as not satisfying the “significant influence” criteria.

(2)

Impairment losses recognized in the period are recorded in financial income and expenses.


Reminder:Recap: Movements in non-consolidated investments during 2004:2008 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December 31,
2007

Additions

Disposals

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Fair value
adjustments

Impairment
losses(1)

Other

As of
December 31,
2008

Non-consolidated investments

256.1

45.4

(49.5)

(30.2)

(18.6)

1.2

(1.6)

202.8


(1)

Impairment losses recognized in the period are recorded in financial income and expenses.




F-44


(€ millions)

As of January 1,2004 adjusted

Acquisitions

Disposals

Fair value adjustments

As of December 31,

2004 adjusted

Non-consolidated investments

198.2

26.3

-56.3

12.9

181.1


Back to Contents



NoteNOTE 10

Non-current and current operating financial assets

Operating financial assets comprise financial assets resulting from the application of IFRIC 12 on accounting for concession contracts (see Note 1.20)arrangements and from the application of IFRIC 4 (see Note 1.21).




Back to contents



Movements in the net carrying amount of non-current and current operating financial assets during2006: 2009 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December 31,2008

New
financial assets

Repayments/
disposals

Impairment
losses(1)

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign
exchange
translation

Non-current/
current
reclassification

Other

As of
December 31, 2009

Gross

5,311.5

467.7

(7.4)

-

(94.9)

34.6

(365.4)

(21.1)

5,325.0

Impairment losses

(12.6)

-

-

(37.4)

-

0.2

-

-

(49.8)

Non-current operating financial assets

5,298.9

467.7

(7.4)

(37.4)

(94.9)

34.8

(365.4)

(21.1)

5,275.2

Gross

452.3

7.8

(447.8)

-

(6.0)

3.5

365.4

4.8

380.0

Impairment losses

-

-

-

(3.4)

-

-

-

-

(3.4)

Current operating financial assets

452.3

7.8

(447.8)

(3.4)

(6.0)

3.5

365.4

4.8

376.6

Non-current and current operating financial assets

5,751.2

475.5

(455.2)

(40.8)

(100.9)

38.3

-

(16.3)

5,651.8


(1)

Impairment losses are recorded in operating income


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

New financial assets

Repayments/ disposals

Impairment losses

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,  

2006

Gross

5,547.6

360.6

(438.1)

-

12.7

(40.8)

23.6

5,465.6

Impairment losses

(2.2)

-

-

(3.9)

-

0.2

(0.1)

(6.0)

Non-current and current operating financial assets

5,545.4

360.6

(438.1)

(3.9)

12.7

(40.6)

23.5

5,459.6

The principalnew operating financial assets in 20062009 mainly concern:

·

the Water Division and mainlyin particular projects in Berlin (€115.2 million), BOT of Brussels (€62.9 million) and BOT of the Hague (€27.2119.6 million);

·

the Energy Services Division and in particular cogeneration plants in France (€45.173.9 million).

The principalrepayments of operating financial assets in 20062009 concern:

·

the Water Division and mainlyin particular projects in Water of Berlin (€130.8 million) and BOT of Brussels (€95.3(-€140.1 million);

·

the Energy Services Division and in particular cogeneration plants in France (€112.4(-€132.7 million).

The others concern transfer fromForeign exchange translation gains on non-current operating financial assets mainly concern the Environmental Services Division (€18.6 million) and the Water Division (€8.7 million), following the appreciation of the pound sterling and the Korean won against the euro.

Changes in consolidation scope mainly concern the sale of waste-to-energy activities in the United States by the Environmental Services Division in the amount of -€41.3 million and changes in consolidation method (from full to operating current financial assets.proportionate consolidation) of the Water Division in North Africa and the Middle East in the amount of -€59.1 million.

Impairment losses mainly concern the Environmental Services Division following the impairment of a contract in Italy in the amount of €38.6 million (including €35.2 million in non-current).



F-45



Back to Contents

(€ millions)

As of December 31,

 

Non-current assets

Current assets

Total

 

2006

2005
adjusted

2004
adjusted

2006

2005
adjusted

2004
adjusted

2006

2005
adjusted

2004
adjusted

Water

3,667.0

3,808.1

3,487.5

163.5

55.2

38.2

3,830.5

3,863.3

3,525.7

Waste Management

711.2

730.5

626.3

25.8

18.7

12.3

737.0

749.2

638.6

Energy Services

651.0

709.1

740.0

120.1

113.0

99.9

771.1

822.1

839.9

Transportation

98.8

83.5

87.9

16.6

20.9

8.4

115.4

104.4

96.3

Other

5.4

6.2

5.3

0.2

0.2

0.1

5.6

6.4

5.4

Operating financial assets

5,133.4

5,337.4

4,947.0

326.2

208.0

158.9

5,459.6

5,545.4

5,105.9


The breakdown of operating financial assets by division is as follows:

 

As of December 31,

 

Non-current

Current

Total

(€ million)

2009

2008

2007

2009

2008

2007

2009

2008

2007

Water

3,870.3

3,851.0

3,719.4

188.8

232.2

165.1

4,059.1

4,083.2

3,884.5

Environmental Services

711.8

768.4

858.1

42.8

68.6

44.3

754.6

837.0

902.4

Energy Services

528.4

562.0

585.4

126.0

117.4

126.9

654.4

679.4

712.3

Transportation

86.7

71.6

104.3

18.7

33.9

18.7

105.4

105.5

123.0

Other

78.0

45.9

5.2

0.3

0.2

0.2

78.3

46.1

5.4

Operating financial assets

5,275.2

5,298.9

5,272.4

376.6

452.3

355.2

5,651.8

5,751.2

5,627.6


IFRIC 12 operating financial assets maturity schedule:


(€ millions)

1 Year

2 Years

3 to 5 years

After 5 years

Total

Water

144.9

143.0

342.9

2,830.5

3,461.3

Waste Management

16.5

63.9

71.8

487.1

639.3

Energy Services

5.6

6.0

12.6

36.5

60.7

Transportation

16.6

18.4

35.6

44.8

115.4

Other

0.2

0.2

0.8

4.4

5.6

Total

183.8

231.5

463.7

3,403.3

4,282.3


(€ million)

1 year

2 to 3 years

4 to 5 years

More than five years

Total

Water

165.1

359.0

367.9

2,723.6

3,615.6

Environmental Services

40.9

107.4

116.4

461.1

725.8

Energy Services

5.2

26.6

7.5

30.0

69.3

Transportation

18.7

37.0

12.2

24.6

92.5

Other

0.3

-

-

4.7

5.0

Total

230.2

530.0

504.0

3,244.0

4,508.2


IFRIC 4 operating financial assets maturity schedule:


(€ millions)

1 Year

2 Years

3 to 5 years

After 5 years

Total

Water

18.6

21.3

71.0

258.2

369.1

Waste Management

9.3

9.9

30.9

47.7

97.8

Energy Services

114.5

118.9

316.9

160.1

710.4

Transportation

-

-

-

-

-

Other

-

-

-

-

-

Total

142.4

150.1

418.8

466.0

1,177.3


(€ million)

1 year

2 to 3 years

4 to 5 years

More than five years

Total

Water

23.7

54.0

65.1

300.7

443.5

Environmental Services

1.9

8.5

9.1

9.3

28.8

Energy Services

120.9

182.2

74.3

207.7

585.1

Transportation

-

3.6

5.9

3.4

12.9

Other

-

-

-

73.3

73.3

Total

146.5

248.3

154.4

594.4

1,143.6




F-46



Back to contentsContents



Reminder:Recap: Movements in the net carrying amount of non-current and current operating financial assets during 2005:  2008 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December
31, 2007

New
financial
assets

Repayments/
disposals

Impairment
losses

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign
exchange
translation

Non-current /
current
reclassification

Other

As of
December
31, 2008

Gross

5,278.4

551.0

(3.2)

-

87.8

(129.6)

(453.2)

(19.7)

5,311.5

Impairment losses

(6.0)

-

-

(6.4)

-

(0.2)

-

-

(12.6)

Non-current operating financial assets

5,272.4

551.0

(3.2)

(6.4)

87.8

(129.8)

(453.2)

(19.7)

5,298.9

Gross

355.2

1.7

(355.0)

-

5.4

(8.7)

453.2

0.5

452.3

Impairment losses

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Current operating financial assets

355.2

1.7

(355.0)

-

5.4

(8.7)

453.2

0.5

452.3

Non-current and current operating financial assets

5,627.6

552.7

(358.2)

(6.4)

93.2

(138.5)

-

(19.2)

5,751.2


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

New financial assets

Repayments/ disposals

Impairment losses

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

Gross

5,105.9

513.4

(320.6)

-

75.0

123.0

50.9

5,547.6

Impairment losses

-

-

-

(2.2)

-

-

-

(2.2)

Non-current and current operating financial assets

5,105.9

513.4

(320.6)

(2.2)

75.0

123.0

50.9

5,545.4

The €439.5 million increase inprincipalnew operating financial assets on 2004 is in 2008 mainly due toconcern:

the Water Division and in particular projects in Berlin (€113.9 million), the Oman Sur BOT ofcontract (€63.4 million) and the Brussels Aquiris contract (€40.2 million);

the HagueEnergy Services Division and in particular cogeneration plants (€124.2 million Water Division)58.2 million).

The decrease inprincipalrepayments of operating financial assets in 2008 concern:

the Water Division and in particular projects in Berlin (-€135.3 million);

the Energy Services Division and in particular cogeneration plants (-€96.6 million).

Foreign exchange translation losses mainly concern the Water Division (-€45.0 million) and the Environmental Services Division (-€85.5 million), following the depreciation of the Korean won, the Chinese renminbi yuan and the pound sterling against the euro.

Changes in consolidation scope mainly concern the Water Division and the acquisition of a joint investment in Veolia Israel (Ashkelon contract) in the Energy Service Division is due to the repayment of cogeneration financial assets.


Reminder: Movements in the net carrying amount of non-current and current operating financial assets during 2004:  


(€ millions)

As of January 1,2004 adjusted

New financial assets

Repayments/ disposals

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Gross

4,956.5

428.5

(275.8)

3.2

(11.3)

4.8

5,105.9

Impairment losses

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Non-current and current operating financial assets

4,956.5

428.5

(275.8)

3.2

(11.3)

4.8

5,105.9


The €149.4 million increase in operating financial assets on 2003 is mainly due to construction projects. The decrease in operating financial assets in the energy Services Division is due to the segment of cogeneration financial assets.



€98.4 million.

NoteNOTE 11

Other non-current and current financial assets

 

As of December 31,

(€ million)

Non-current

Current

Total

 

2009

2008

2007

2009

2008

2007

2009

2008

2007

Gross

774.8

803.0

572.6

195.8

283.3

174.1

970.6

1,086.3

746.7

Impairment losses

(73.5)

(63.4)

(57.6)

(31.9)

(27.9)

(21.3)

(105.4)

(91.2)

(78.9)

Financial assets in loans and receivables

701.3

739.6

515.0

163.9

255.4

152.8

865.2

995.0

667.9

Other financial assets

52.6

77.7

231.0

53.8

66.0

177.2

106.4

143.7

408.2

Total other financial assets, net

753.9

817.3

746.0

217.7

321.4

330.0

971.6

1,138.7

1,076.1




F-47



OtherBack to Contents


11.1

Movements in other non-current financial assets

Movements in the value of other non-current financial assets during2006: 2009 are as follows:


(€ millions)

As of December 31,  

2005 adjusted

Additions

Repayments/ disposals

Changes in consolidation scope

Impairment losses

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,  

2006

(€ million)

As of
December
31,2008

Additions

Repayments/
disposals

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Impairment
losses(1)

Foreign
exchange
translation

Non-current /
current
reclassification

Other

As of
December
31, 2009

Gross

496.0

69.4

(29.2)

2.7

-

(15.3)

(21.6)

502.0

803.0

50.7

(68.6)

31.2

-

3.2

(14.7)

(30.0)

774.8

Impairment losses

(63.4)

-

-

(0.1)

(9.9)

2.0

0.1

(2.2)

(73.5)

Other long-term loans, net

428.4

69.4

(29.2)

2.7

2.4

(8.7)

(21.6)

443.4

Gross

279.4

27.8

(22.3)

(45.5)

-

(3.2)

(29.7)

206.5

Impairment losses

(16.2)

-

-

3.4

0.4

-

(12.4)

Other investments, net

263.2

27.8

(22.3)

(45.5)

3.4

(2.8)

(29.7)

194.1

Other non-current financial assets, net

691.6

97.2

(51.5)

(42.8)

5.8

(11.5)

(51.3)

637.5

Non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

739.6

50.7

(68.6)

31.1

(9.9)

5.2

(14.6)

(32.2)

701.3

Other non-current financial assets

77.7

10.9

(4.5)

(8.2)

(0.5)

2.0

(3.2)

(21.6)

52.6

Total Other non-current financial assets, net

817.3

61.6

(73.1)

22.9

(10.4)

7.2

(17.8)

(53.8)

753.9


(1)

Impairment losses are recorded in financial income and expenses.


(1)

Impairment losses are recorded in financial income and expenses.


Other long-termNon-current financial assets in loans netand receivables

AdditionsRepayments mainly correspond to athe change in the non-Group portion of the loan to non-Group partDalkia International for €43 million.

Changes in consolidation scope are mainly the result of loana change in consolidation method (from full to a company consolidated usingproportionate consolidation) of the proportionate method.Water Division in North Africa and the Middle East for €48.4 million.

Other movements concern the transferreclassification of loans to operating financial assets.

Other long-term loansbalances in “Assets classified as of December 31, 2006 mainly include:

·

A deposit paid related to the Berlin contract held by Veolia Wasser GmbH (Water Division, Germany) of €97.3 million;

·

Water Division loans of €22 million in the United States;

·

Payment guarantee deposits of €36.7 million and other deposits of €20.9 million;

·

Non-group loans to companies consolidated using the proportionate method.

Cumulated impairment losses on other long-term loans mainly include the impairment of Water Division long-term loans in the U.S. in the cumulative amount of -€57.1 million as of December 31, 2006 and -€63.7 million as of December 31, 2005 (the decrease is mainly due to changes in the U.S. dollar exchange rate).


Other investments, net

Changes in the scope of consolidation include the unblocking of the collateral guarantees intended to finance Water Division investments in Chinafor sale” in the amount of -€45.415.4 million, (€21.1 million in respect of Kunming contract and €24.3 million in respect of Changhou contract), the impact of the sale of Southern Water preferential sharesmainly in the amountTransportation Division.

As of -€66.3December 31, 2009, the principal non-current financial assets in loans and receivables primarily correspond to the non-Group portion of loans granted to companies consolidated on a proportionate basis for €450.4 million (mainly Dalkia International and a collateral guarantee including an advance from the French State to SNCM in the amount of €38.5 million.its subsidiaries).

Other non-current financial assets

Other non-current financial assets are classified as “Available-for-sale assets” in accordance with the principles set out in Note 1.15.2.

Other movements notably mainly concern the transfer of other investmentsfinancial assets hedging pension obligations to Non-consolidated investments.

Other investmentsasthe new operator, following the loss of December 31, 2006 mainly include:




Back to contents



·

Guarantee deposits paid to suppliers and othersa contract in the amount of €14.9 million;

·

Pension funds and other employee-related obligations in the amount of €35.8 million;

·

Collateral guarantees including an advance from the French State to SNCM inMelbourne by the Transportation Division (+€38.5 million).Division.


No amounts were transferred to Non-current assets held for sale in 2004, 2005 or 2006.


Reminder: MovementsRecap: movements in the value of other non-current financial assets during 2005:2008 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December
31,2007

Additions

Repayments/
disposals

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Impairment
losses(1)

Foreign
exchange
translation

Non-current /
current
reclassification

Other

As of
December
31, 2008

Gross

572.6

262.0

(30.6)

18.2

-

(20.0)

(6.6)

7.4

803.0

Impairment losses

(57.6)

-

-

0.3

(3.4)

(3.0)

-

0.3

(63.4)

Non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

515.0

262.0

(30.6)

18.5

(3.4)

(23.0)

(6.6)

7.7

739.6

Other non-current financial assets

231.0

35.5

(10.3)

(33.0)

(1.9)

(7.6)

-

(136.0)

77.7

Total Other non-current financial assets, net

746.0

297.5

(40.9)

(14.5)

(5.3)

(30.6)

(6.6)

(128.3)

817.3


(1)

Impairment losses are recorded in financial income and expenses.



F-48


(€ millions)

As of December 31,

2004 adjusted

Additions

Repayments/ disposals

Changes in consolidation scope

Impairment losses

Fair value adjustments

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,  

2005 adjusted

Gross

469.1

62.1

(55.7)

(0.3)

-

(1.2)

22.2

(0.2)

496.0

Impairment losses

(61.0)

-

-

-

1.7

-

(8.8)

0.5

(67.6)

Other long-term loans, net

408.1

62.1

(55.7)

(0.3)

1.7

(1.2)

13.4

0.3

428.4

Gross

210.3

63.1

(24.6)

34.6

-

(7.1)

9.3

(6.2)

279.4

Impairment losses

(11.7)

-

-

(2.3)

(2.9)

-

(0.6)

1.3

(16.2)

Other investments, net

198.6

63.1

(24.6)

32.3

(2.9)

(7.1)

8.7

(4.9)

263.2

Other non-current financial assets, net

606.7

125.2

(80.3)

32.0

(1.2)

(8.3)

22.1

(4.6)

691.6


ChangesBack to Contents


Non-current financial assets in consolidation scopeloans and receivables

Additions mainly correspond to the change in the non-Group portion of the loan to Dalkia International for €208.6 million.

As ofDecember 31, 2008, the principal non-current financial assets in loans and receivables primarily correspond to the non-Group portion of loans granted to companies consolidated on a proportionate basis for €434.2 million (Dalkia International and its subsidiaries).

Other non-current financial assets

Other non-current financial assets are classified as “Available-for-sale assets” in accordance with the principles set out in Note 1.15.2.

Other movements mainly concern the use of the investment placed in an escrow account in 2007, in the amount of €94.7 million, on the acquisition of Tianjin Shibei shares in China (Water Division).

11.2

Movements in current financial assets

Movements in other current financial assets during 2009 are as follows:



(€ million)

As of
December
31,2008

Changes
in
business

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Fair value
adjustments

Impairment
losses(1)

Foreign
exchange
translation

Non-current /
current
reclassification

Other

As of
December
31, 2009

Gross

283.3

(141.3)

15.0

-

-

0.1

14.6

24.1

195.8

Impairment losses

(27.9)

-

0.1

-

(6.1)

0.1

(0.2)

2.1

(31.9)

Current financial assets in loans and receivables

255.4

(141.3)

15.1

-

(6.1)

0.2

14.4

26.2

163.9

Other current financial assets

66.0

3.7

(0.7)

(0.2)

(0.4)

(0.5)

3.2

(17.3)

53.8

Total other current financial assets, net

321.4

(137.6)

14.4

(0.2)

(6.5)

(0.3)

17.6

8.9

217.7


(1)

Impairment losses are recorded in financial income and expenses.


The accounting treatment of other current financial assets in loans and receivables complies with the required treatment of loans and receivables as defined by IAS 39.

Other financial assets are treated as available-for-sale assets for accounting purposes.

Other net current financial assets as of December 31, 2005 include2009 of €217.7 million primarily comprise the additionpre-financing of sharesassets in the amount of €27.4 million following the acquisition of the Waste Water contract of the town of Braunschweig (Water Division, Germany).Transportation Divisions for €62.3 million.

The increaseRecap: movements in other investments is mainly due to the new collateral guarantees intended for investment in the Changzou and Kunming contracts (Water Division, China) in the amount of €24.3 million and €21.1 million respectively at the balance sheet date.


Reminder: Movements in the value of other non-currentcurrent financial assets during 2004:


(€ millions)

As of January 1,2004 adjusted

Additions

Repayments/ disposals

Changes in consolidation scope

Impairment losses

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,

2004 adjusted

Gross

495.4

132.5

(129.4)

(18.9)

-

(6.0)

(4.5)

469.1

Impairment losses

(70.4)

-

5.7

-

(1.3)

4.5

0.5

(61.0)

Other long-term loans, net

425.0

132.5

(123.7)

(18.9)

(1.3)

(1.5)

(4.0)

408.1

Gross

366.0

(45.7)

-

(3.4)

(12.3)

(10.4)

(83.9)

210.3

Impairment losses

(8.0)

-

(25.0)

0.5

2.6

0.2

18.0

(11.7)

Other investments, net

358.0

(45.7)

(25.0)

(2.9)

(9.7)

(10.2)

(65.9)

198.6

Other non-current financial assets, net

783.0

86.8

(148.7)

(21.8)

(11.0)

(11.7)

(69.9)

606.7

The "Additions" amounts2008 are mainly related to a loan granted by Veolia Environnement SA to Dalkia International (the latter is consolidated using the proportional method) for €48.5 million and to the increase of deposits of Veolia Environnement SA for €16.0 million.as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December
31,2007

Changes
in
business

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Fair value
adjustments

Impairment
losses(1)

Foreign
exchange
translation

Non-current /
current
reclassification

Other

As of
December
31, 2008

Gross

174.1

90.7

(8.4)

-

-

1.3

6.6

19.0

283.3

Impairment losses

(21.3)

-

(0.3)

-

(4.4)

-

-

(1.9)

(27.9)

Current financial assets in loans and receivables

152.8

90.7

(8.7)

-

(4.4)

1.3

6.6

17.1

255.4

Other current financial assets

177.2

6.9

(12.4)

(0.3)

(3.4)

(5.6)

-

(96.4)

66.0

Total other current financial assets, net

330.0

97.6

(21.1)

(0.3)

(7.8)

(4.3)

6.6

(79.3)

321.4


(1)

Impairment losses are recorded in financial income and expenses.


The repayments/disposals of the gross long-term loans come mainly from the reimbursement of the loans belonging to the previous transportation contract of Melbourne (€(44.6) million).

AsOther current financial assets as of December 31, 2004, the acquisition flow (€(45.7) million) includes €(80)2008 of €321.4 million pledged as a collateral guarantee intendedprimarily comprise loans granted to be investednon-consolidated companies in the Shenzhen contract. The acquisition was completedWater division of €42.2 million, funds placed in 2004,an escrow account with a view to acquisitions in the Water and Energy Services Divisions of €64.7 million and pre-financing of assets in the company has been consolidated since the last quarter 2004.Transportation Division of €122.8 million.



NoteF-49



Back to Contents


NOTE 12

Deferred tax assets and liabilities


Movements in deferred tax assets and liabilities during2006: 2009 are as follows:


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

Changes in business through profit or loss

Changes in business through equity

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2006

(€ million)

As of
December
31, 2008

Changes in
business
through
net income

Changes in
business
through
equity

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign
exchange
translation

Other

As of
December
31, 2009

Deferred tax assets, gross

1,592.7

71.2

(14.2)

109.3

(24.4)

53.0

1,787.6

2,150.2

165.3

9.2

(30.8)

3.2

26.3

2,323.4

Deffered tax assets not recognized

(458.0)

11.7

0.3

-

8.0

6.1

(431.9)

Deferred tax assets not recognized

(570.7)

(71.7)

2.5

25.7

(6.5)

(81.4)

(702.1)

Deferred tax assets, net

1,134.7

82.9

(13.9)

109.3

(16.4)

59.1

1,355.7

1,579.5

93.6

11.7

(5.1)

(3.3)

(55.1)

1,621.3

Deferred tax liabilities

1,205.0

98.0

15.9

140.3

(13.2)

58.9

1,504.9

1,936.0

30.4

(0.1)

(15.3)

20.2

(20.0)

1,951.2


ChangesAs of December 31, 2009, the tax group in business through profit or loss includethe United States has ordinary tax losses carried forward, relating to the restructuring of Water businesses in 2006 and associated with losses incurred by the former activities of U.S. Filter. These tax losses, which may exceed U.S.$4 billion, are currently being reviewed by the U.S. tax authorities, at the request of the company, which considers the validity of these tax losses to be established, based on external appraisals. A deferred tax asset of €50.6U.S.$407 million (€283 million) is recognized in Net income (expense) from discontinued operationsthe Consolidated Statement of Financial Position in respect of these tax losses as of December 31, 2009, compared to U.S.$434 million (€312 million) as of December 31, 2008.

This decrease is mainly due to the sale of waste-to-energy activities in the Income Statement.USA which decreased the future taxation of the Group (€64 million), partially offset by the recognition of additional deferred tax assets of €43 million in respect of other activities, enabled by the tax schedule.

Conversely, the French tax group offset tax losses brought forward and previously capitalized in the amount of €46 million.

Changes in business through equity mainly include the tax effect of fair value adjustments and actuarial gains and losses.

Changes in consolidatedconsolidation scope mainly concern the entry intosale of VPNM in the scope of consolidation of CleanawayEnvironmental Services Division in the amount of €45.3-€2.8 million in gross deferred tax assets and €26.7 millionthe sale of Freight activities in liabilities and of SNCMthe Transportation Division in the amount of €53.1 million in assets and €66.7-€8.5 million in liabilities.

Veolia Environnement launched a reorganization of itsForeign exchange translation gains and losses are mainly due to fluctuations in the U.S. dollar and the pound sterling against the euro.

Other movements are due to the impact on the U.S. tax group of the sale of waste-to-energy activities in 2006. This reorganization should enable the Group to recoverUnited States in the amount of -€64.8 million and the reclassification of certain subsidiaries in “Assets classified as held for sale” and “Liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale”. The deferred tax assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries were reclassified in the amount of -€12.5 million and - €31.8 million respectively.



F-50



Back to contentsContents



significant tax losses carried forward relating to the former activities of U.S. Filter.  The Group recognized a deferred tax asset of €188 million as of December 31, 2006, in respect of a portion of tax losses carried forward, substantiated by 5-year tax projections.  These operations are currently under review by the U.S. tax authorities.


Deferred tax assets and liabilitiesbreak down by nature as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31,2007

Deferred tax assets

   

Tax losses

976.2

895.3

851.0

Provisions and impairment losses

401.6

368.4

374.1

Employee benefits

219.3

187.0

134.6

Financial instruments

159.0

142.5

106.0

Operating financial assets

112.5

106.1

107.5

Fair value remeasurement of assets purchased

65.8

79.3

88.5

Foreign exchange translation

8.5

17.9

8.0

Finance leases

34.5

34.2

31.4

Intangible assets and Property, plant and equipment

28.7

21.8

20.5

Other

317.3

297.7

315.9

Deferred tax assets, gross

2,323.4

2,150.2

2,037.5

Deferred tax assets not recognized

(702.1)

(570.7)

(569.4)

Recognized deferred tax assets

1,621.3

1,579.5

1,468.1


(€ millions)

As of December
31, 2006

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Deferred tax assets

   

 Employee benefits

172.4

137.6

87.6

Impairment provisions

16.6

13.5

9.3

Tax losses

775.4

689.9

697.2

Finance leases / Assets

34.1

51.6

52.4

Temporary differences on provisions

255.5

175.4

175.9

Other deductible temporary differences

533.6

524.7

496.5

Gross deferred tax assets

1,787.6

1,592.7

1,518.9

Deferred tax assets not recognized

(431.9)

(458.0)

(387.1)

Recognized deferred tax assets

1,355.7

1,134.7

1,131.8


 

As of December
31, 2006

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Deferred tax liabilities

   

Deferred tax on amortization differential

553.6

540.6

482.3

Asset remeasurement

389.4

231.0

207.2

Finance leases / Liabilities

27.4

46.1

35.6

 Other taxable temporary differences

534.5

387.3

296.2

Deferred tax liabilities

1,504.9

1,205.0

1,021.3

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31,2007

Deferred tax liabilities

   

Intangible assets and Property, plant and equipment

799.2

676.6

662.0

Fair value remeasurement of assets purchased

245.2

276.4

310.1

Operating financial assets

192.5

191.5

187.1

Financial instruments

91.2

89.2

48.4

Finance leases

88.9

76.1

18.9

Provisions

47.1

56.8

52.9

Foreign exchange translation

11.7

38.9

23.0

Employee benefits

36.9

19.0

4.3

Other

438.5

511.5

488.0

Deferred tax liabilities

1,951.2

1,936.0

1,794.7


Deffered tax liabilities on undistributed earnings from subsidiaries, investments in associates and joint-venture are non material.

F-51



Back to Contents


Deferred tax assets and liabilitiesbreak down by destination as follows:


(€ millions)

As of December
31, 2006

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31,2007

Deferred tax assets, net

     

Deferred tax assets on net income

1,276.7

970.3

1,024.4

1,471.5

1,433.8

1,400.5

Deferred tax assets on reserves

79.0

164.4

107.4

149.9

145.7

67.6

Deferred tax assets, net

1,355.7

1,134.7

1,131.8

1,621.3

1,579.5

1,468.1

Deferred tax liabilities

   

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities on net income

1,476.4

1,147.9

935.8

1,900.5

1,876.8

1,755.1

Deferred tax liabilities on reserves

28.5

57.1

85.5

50.7

59.2

39.6

Deferred tax liabilities

1,504.9

1,205.0

1,021.3

1,951.2

1,936.0

1,794.7



GrossTheexpiry schedule for tax losses capitalizednot recognized as of December 31, 2006 becometime-barred2009 is as follows:


(€ millions)

Time barred in

Total

 

≤ 5 years

6 to 10 years

11 to 20 years

Unlimited

 

Gross tax losses

96.2

29.1

110.4

539.7

775.4

 

Expiry

Total

(€ million)

≤ 5 years

 > 5 years

Unlimited

Tax losses not recognized

14.6

96.3

446.6

557.5


Reminder:Recap: Movements in deferred tax assets and liabilities during 2005:  2008 are as follows:


(€ millions)

(€ million)

As of December 31, 2007

Changes in business through net income

Changes in business through equity

Changes in consolidation
scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2008

Deferred tax assets, gross

1,518.9

(78.2)

38.2

32.7

92.1

(11.0)

1,592.7

2,037.5

18.7

71.7

26.6

13.2

(17.5)

2,150.2

Deffered tax assets not recognized

(387.1)

(46.9)

-

-

(24.0)

-

(458.0)

Deferred tax assets not recognized

(569.4)

(2.2)

(11.3)

1.6

11.0

(0.4)

(570.7)

Deferred tax assets, net

1,131.8

(125.1)

38.2

32.7

68.1

(11.0)

1,134.7

1,468.1

16.5

60.4

28.2

24.2

(17.9)

1,579.5

Deferred tax liabilities

1,021.3

(12.1)

(8.5)

141.8

63.0

(0.5)

1,205.0






Back to contents



Reminder: Movements in deferred tax assets and liabilities during 2004:  


(€ millions)

As of January 1,2004 adjusted

Changes in business

Fair value adjustments

Changes in consolid-ation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Deferred tax assets, gross

1,476.8

(30.6)

-

45.1

(76.7)

104.3

1,518.9

Deffered tax assets not recognized

(445.6)

58.5

-

-

-

-

(387.1)

Deferred tax assets, net

1,031.2

27.9

-

45.1

(76.7)

104.3

1,131.8

Deferred tax liabilities

1,109.0

(18.5)

-

26.7

(55.0)

(40.9)

1,021.3


NoteNOTE 13

Working capital

Movements in net working capital during20062009: are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December
31,2008

Changes
in
business

Impairment
losses

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign
exchange
translation

Reclassification
in assets /
liabilities
classified as
held for sale

Other

As of
December
31, 2009

Inventories and work-in-progress, net

1,022.0

16.2

6.1

(3.6)

4.4

(53.5)

5.7

997.3

Operating receivables, net

13,093.2

(407.7)

(82.3)

(219.8)

95.5

(107.6)

(123.8)

12,247.5

Operating payables, net

13,591.8

(99.7)

-

(227.9)

105.3

(174.7)

(119.1)

13,075.7

Net working capital

523.4

(291.8)

(76.2)

4.5

(5.4)

13.6

1.0

169.1


The amount transferred to “Assets classified as held for sale” and “Liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale” primarily concerns waste-to-energy activities in the United States in the Environmental Services Division and Renewable Energy activities.



F-52


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

Changes in business

Impairment losses

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2006

Inventories and work-in-progress, net

635.2

77.2

(2.4)

36.8

(5.3)

(9.7)

731.8

Operating receivables, net

10,083.3

508.7

(33.3)

495.5

(55.8)

(29.7)

10,968.7

Operating payables, net

10,369.8

460.0

-

536.5

(54.1)

(43.6)

11,268.6

Net working capital

348.7

125.9

(35.7)

(4.2)

(7.0)

4.2

431.9


Amounts transferredBack to Non-current assets held for sale totaled €22.3 million in 2006 (Denmark transportation activities). No amounts were transferred in 2005 or 2004.Contents

Amounts transferred to Non-current assets held for sale totaled €20.2 million in 2006 (Denmark transportation activities). No amounts were transferred in 2005 or 2004.

Net working capital includes “operating” working capital requirements of operations (inventories, trade receivables, andtrade payables and other operating receivables and payables)payables, tax receivables and taxpayables other than current tax), “tax” working capital requirements (current tax receivables and payables) and “investment” working capital (receivables and payables in respect of capital expenditure). Movements during the yearin each of €125.9 million concern WCR of operations in the amount of €111.8 million and taxthese working capital requirementscategories in the amount of €14.1 million.2009 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December
31,2008

Changes
in
business

Impairment
losses

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign
exchange
translation

Reclassification
in assets /
liabilities
classified as held
for sale

Other

As of
December
31, 2009

Inventories and work-in-progress, net

1,022.0

16.2

6.1

(3.6)

4.4

(53.5)

5.7

997.3

Operating receivables (including tax receivables other than current tax)

12,844.4

(434.7)

(82.5)

(217.1)

89.0

(92.7)

(59.6)

12,046.8

Operating payables (including tax payables other than current tax)

(12,791.9)

62.7

-

207.2

(94.3)

73.5

42.3

(12,500.5)

Operating working capital

1,074.5

(355.8)

(76.4)

(13.5)

(0.9)

(72.7)

(11.6)

543.6

Tax receivables (current tax)

227.0

31.4

-

(2.7)

6.5

(13.3)

(59.2)

189.7

Tax payables (current tax)

(324.7)

(19.0)

-

(1.7)

(12.3)

72.1

64.8

(220.8)

Tax working capital

(97.7)

12.4

-

(4.4)

(5.8)

58.8

5.6

(31.1)

Receivables on non-current asset disposals

21.8

(4.4)

0.2

0.0

-

(1.6)

(5.0)

11

Capital expenditure payables

(475.2)

56.0

-

22.4

1.3

29.1

12.0

(354.4)

Investment working capital

(453.4)

51.6

0.2

22.4

1.3

27.5

7.0

(343.4)

Net working capital

523.4

(291.8)

(76.2)

4.5

(5.4)

13.6

1.0

169.1


Movements in inventories during20062009: are as follows:

Stocks


(€ million)

As of
December
31,2008

Changes
in
business

Impairment
losses

Reversal of
impairment
losses

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign
exchange
translation

Reclassification
in assets /
liabilities
classified as held
for sale

Other

As of
December
31, 2009

Raw materials and supplies

635.3

16.0

-

-

(6.6)

5.1

(12.5)

(6.4)

630.9

Work-in-progress

329.3

1.4

-

-

(0.4)

(1.8)

(42.7)

1.3

287.1

Other inventories(1)

139.4

(1.2)

-

-

3.0

2.3

0.1

10.6

154.2

Inventories and work-in-progress, gross

1,104.0

16.2

-

-

(4.0)

5.6

(55.1)

5.5

1 ,072.2

Impairment losses on inventories and work-in-progress

(82.0)

-

(36.5)

42.6

0.4

(1.2)

1.6

0.2

(74.9)

Inventories and work-in-progress, net

1,022.0

16.2

(36.5)

42.6

(3.6)

4.4

(53.5)

5.7

997.3


(1) Including CO2 inventory


Inventories mainly concern the Water Division in the amount of €335.5 million and the Energy Services Division in the amount of €389.2 million.



F-53


Inventories


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

Changes in business

Impairment losses

Reversals of impairment losses

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2006

Raw materials and supplies

381.8

46.8

-

-

31.1

(2.9)

(4.2)

452.6

Work-in-progress

204.8

28.2

-

-

8.0

(0.7)

(2.9)

237.4

Finished products inventories

68.8

3.6

-

-

4.0

(1.0)

(2.4)

73.0

Contracts in progress

9.8

(1.4)

-

-

-

(0.6)

0.2

8.0

Inventories and work-in-progress, gross

665.2

77.2

-

-

43.1

(5.2)

(9.3)

771.0

Impairment losses on raw materials and supplies

(20.5)

-

(9.9)

6.7

(6.0)

(0.2)

(0.4)

(30.3)

Impairment losses on work-in-progress

(0.5)

-

(0.6)

0.3

-

-

-

(0.8)

Impairment losses on finished products inventories

(9.0)

-

(2.9)

4

(0.3)

0.1

-

(8.1)

Impairment losses on contracts in progress

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Impairment losses on inventories and work-in-progress

(30.0)

-

(13.4)

11.0

(6.3)

(0.1)

(0.4)

(39.2)

Inventories and work-in-progress, net

635.2

77.2

(13.4)

11.0

36.8

(5.3)

(9.7)

731.8



Back to Contents


Movements in operating receivables during20062009:are as follows:


Operating receivables


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

Changes in business

Impairment losses

Reversals of impairment losses

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2006

Trade accounts receivable

8,644.2

356.7

-

-

389.2

(51.0)

(9.2)

9,329.9

Other operating accounts receivable

1,276.8

21.9

-

-

103.2

(7.7)

(10.3)

1,383.9

Tax receivables

691.1

130.1

-

-

17.2

(0.5)

(12.6)

825.3

Operating receivables, gross

10,612.1

508.7

-

-

509.6

(59.2)

(32.1)

11,539.1

Impairment losses on trade accounts receivable

(403.9)

-

(152.7)

113.8

(9.1)

3.2

-

(448.7)

Impairment losses on other operating accounts receivable

(124.9)

-

(8.5)

14.1

(5.0)

0.2

2.4

(121.7)

Impairment losses on operating receivables

(528.8)

-

(161.2)

127.9

(14.1)

3.4

2.4

(570.4)

Operating receivables, net

10,083.3

508.7

(161.2)

127.9

495.5

(55.8)

(29.7)

10,968.7





Back to contents


Operating receivables


(€ million)

As of
December
31,2008

Changes
in
business

Impairment
losses(1)

Reversal of
impairment
losses

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign
exchange
translation

Reclassification
in assets /
liabilities
classified as held
for sale

Other

As of
December
31, 2009

Trade receivables

10,253.0

(378.2)

-

-

(199.6)

55.8

(56.9)

(32.5)

9,641.6

Impairment losses on trade receivables

(550.9)

-

(180.5)

112.2

11.3

(0.3)

9.5

38.4

(560.3)

Trade receivables, net(2)

9,702.1

(378.2)

(180.5)

112.2

(188.3)

55.5

(47.4)

5.9

9,081.3

Other operating receivables

1,314.1

(63.3)

-

-

(12.0)

24.6

(15.2)

(70.2)

1,178.0

Impairment losses on other operating receivables

(59.6)

-

(27.7)

13.7

0.0

(0.2)

-

(3.0)

(76.8)

Other operating receivables, net(2)

1,254.5

(63.3)

(27.7)

13.7

(12.0)

24.4

(15.2)

(73.2)

1,101.2

Other
receivables(3)

663.4

89.0

-

-

(1.7)

8.1

(28.4)

0.9

731.3

Tax receivables

1,473.2

(55.2)

-

-

(17.8)

7.5

(16.6)

(57.4)

1,333.7

Operating receivables, net

13,093.2

(407.7)

(208.2)

125.9

(219.8)

95.5

(107.6)

(123.8)

12,247.5


(1)

Impairment losses are recorded in operating income and included in the line “Changes in working capital” in the Consolidated Cash Flow Statement.

(2)

Financial assets as defined by IAS 39, valued in accordance with the rules applicable to loans and receivables.

(3)

Receivables recognized on a percentage completion basis in respect of construction activities and prepayments.


Operating receivables are treated as loans and receivables for accounting purposes. Short-term commercial receivables and payables without a declared interest rate are recognized at nominal value, unless discounting at the market rate has a material impact.


Changes in consolidation scope primarily concerned the following acquisitions and disposals:

Water:change in consolidation method (from full to proportionate consolidation) of the Water Division in North Africa and the Middle East following a change in governance for -€111.6 million and change in consolidation method (from proportionate to full consolidation) of Italian concessions for €47.6 million.

Environmental Services: sale of the VPNM sub-group for -€84.4 million.

Transportation: sale of Freight activities for -€59 million.

Foreign exchange translation gains and losses are primarily due to the appreciation of the Australian dollar, Brazilian real and pound sterling against the euro.

Securitization of receivables in France

The French securitization program is governed by an agreement signed in June 2002 for five years with a securitized debt fund. Veolia Environnement had securitized receivables through its Water Division subsidiaries in the amount of €397.6 million, net of discount, as of December 31, 2006 (compared to €413Securitized debts total €499.7 million as of December 31, 2005)2009 compared to €496.6 million at the end of December 2008.

These receivables are retained in assets and the financing secured is recorded in “Current borrowings” (see Note 17, Current borrowings).


DiscountingAssignment of receivables

Discounted receivables (Dailly sales) were nil as of December 31, 2006, compared to €115.2 million (Dailly sales and other) as of December 31, 2005.


Discounted receivablesReceivables definitively soldassigned to third parties in the Energy Services Division in Italy totaled €108€178 million as of December 31, 2006,2009, compared to €121€69.4 million as of December 31, 2005.2008 and €25.5 million as of December 31, 2007.



F-54



Back to Contents


Movements in operating payables during2006: 2009 are as follows:


Operating payables

(€ millions)

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

Changes in business

Changes in consolid-ation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2006

Trade accounts payable

5,430.8

39.5

333.4

(27.5)

(11.9)

5,764.3

Operating payables

(€ million)

As of
December 31,
2008

Changes in
business

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign
exchange
translation

Reclassification
in assets /
liabilities
classified as held
for sale

Other

As of December
31, 2009

Trade payables(1)

5,634.5

(273.7)

(50.4)

35.3

(30.4)

(4.3)

5,311.0

Other current operating payables(1)

5,112.2

1.9

(129.7)

47.3

(63.6)

(34.7)

4,933.4

Other liabilities(2)

1,255.6

90.8

(1.2)

6.8

(6.0)

(21.6)

1,324.4

Tax and employee-related liabilities

4,939.0

420.5

203.1

(26.6)

(31.7)

5,504.3

1,589.5

81.3

(46.6)

15.9

(74.7)

(58.5)

1,506.9

Operating payables

10,369.8

460.0

536.5

(54.1)

(43.6)

11,268.6

13,591.8

(99.7)

(227.9)

105.3

(174.7)

(119.1)

13,075.7


(1)

Financial liabilities as defined by IAS 39, measured at amortized cost.

(2)

Primarily deferred income.


(1)

Financial liabilities as defined by IAS 39, measured at amortized cost.

(2)

Primarily deferred income.


Reminder:Trade payables are treated as liabilities at amortized cost in accordance with IAS 39 for accounting purposes. Short-term commercial payables without a declared interest rate are recognized at nominal value, unless discounting at the market rate has a material impact.

Changes in consolidation scope primarily concerned the following acquisitions and disposals:

Water:change in consolidation method (from full consolidation to proportionate consolidation) of the Water Division in North Africa and the Middle East following a change in governance for -€123.4 million;

Environmental Services:sale of the VPNM sub-group for -€99.1 million.

Transportation:sale of Freight activities for - €54.3 million.

Foreign exchange translation gains and losses are primarily due to the appreciation of the Australian dollar, Brazilian real and pound sterling against the euro.

Recap: Movements in net working capital during 2005:


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Changes in business

Impairment losses

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

Inventories and work-in-progress, net

560.3

9.2

(1.9)

40.3

14.4

12.9

635.2

Operating receivables, net

9,233.9

557.8

(25.8)

206.2

158.9

(47.7)

10,083.3

Operating payables, net

9,572.2

524.4

-

165.9

150.5

(43.2)

10,369.8

Net working capital

222.0

42.6

(27.7)

80.6

22.8

8.4

348.7


Reminder: Movements in net working capital during 2004:


(€ millions)

As of January 1,2004 adjusted

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Inventories and work-in-progress, net

519.7

 

15.5

(14.8)

39.9

560.3

Operating receivables, net

9,062.0

251.3

37.1

(106.8)

(9.7)

9,233.9

Operating payables, net

8,779.6

537.9

201.2

(43.6)

97.1

9,572.2

Net working capital

802.1

(291.1)

(131.2)

(76.6)

(81,2)

222.0



Note 14

Other short-term loans

Movements in other short-term loans during2006:


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Impairment losses

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2006

Gross

379.5

(2.6)

5.4

-

(3.7)

(15.3)

363.3

Impairment losses

(158.3)

-

-

(1.2)

-

1.5

(158.0)

Other short-term loans, net

221.2

(2.6)

5.4

(1.2)

(3.7)

(13.8)

205.3

Net other short-term loans2008 are as of December 31, 2006 comprise non-group and current accounts to companies consolidated using the proportionate method (mainly in respect of the Berlin contract for €69.8 million and in France in the Water Division for €66.4 million) and the pre-financing of assets in the Transportation Division for €17.7 million.follows:





Back to contents



Reminder: Movements in other short-term loans during 2005:


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Changes in business

Changes in consolid-ation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

Gross

496.0

(115.0)

20.0

4.2

(25.7)

379.5

Impairment losses

(163.0)

-

-

(0.3)

5.0

(158.3)

Other short-term loans, net

333.0

(115.0)

20.0

3.9

(20.7)

221.2


Reminder: Movements in other short-term loans during 2004:


(€ millions)

As of January 1,2004 adjusted

Changes in business

Changes in consolid-ation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Gross

554.9

(41.1)

29.4

(7.4)

(39.8)

496.0

Impairment losses

(165.1)

2.1

-

-

-

(163.0)

Other short-term loans, net

389.8

(39.0)

29.4

(7.4)

(39.8)

333.0


Changes in consolidation scope are mainly related to the acquisition of Wabag France (€12.0 million). Other amounts are smaller than €20 million per unit.


(€ million)

As of
December
31,2007

Changes in
business

Impairment
losses

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign
exchange
translation

Other

As of
December
31, 2008

Inventories and work-in-progress, net

839.4

172.1

(43.2)

75.4

(20.6)

(1.1)

1,022.0

Operating receivables, net

12,459.4

857.4

(24.6)

(33.7)

(183.2)

17.9

13,093.2

Operating payables, net

12,944.8

983.2

-

(36.6)

(231.3)

(68.3)

13,591.8

Net working capital

354.0

46.3

(67.8)

78.3

27.5

85.1

523.4


Note 15NOTE 14

Marketable securities

Movements in marketable securities during2006:


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Fair value adjust-ments

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2006

Gross

62.2

(2.5)

1.4

1.5

(0.3)

4.9

67.2

Impairment losses

(1.5)

-

-

-

-

0.7

(0.8)

Marketable securities

60.7

(2.5)

1.4

1.5

(0.3)

5.6

66.4

The change in the Cash flow statement includes capital gains and losses realized on the sale of marketable securities of €0.9 million as of December 31, 2006.


Reminder: Movements in marketable securities during 2005:


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

Gross

191.5

(117.4)

1.4

1.3

(14.6)

62.2

Impairment losses

(2.2)

-

-

-

0.7

(1.5)

Marketable securities

189.3

(117.4)

1.4

1.3

(13.9)

60.7

The decrease in 2005 is related to the partial sale of the cash UCITS portfolio held by Veolia Environnement SA in the amount of €117.2 million.



Reminder: Movements in marketable securities during 2004:


(€ millions)

As of January 1,2004 adjusted

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Gross

188.5

42.3

(4.2)

(0.5)

(34.6)

191.5

Impairment losses

(3.4)

1.2

-

-

-

(2.2)

Marketable securities

185.1

43.5

(4.2)

(0.5)

(34.6)

189.3





Back to contents




Note 16

Cash and cash equivalents and bank overdrafts and other cash position items

Movements in cash and cash equivalents and bank overdrafts and other cash position items during 2006:2009 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December
31,2008

Changes in
business

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Fair value
adjustments(1)

Foreign
exchange
translation

Other

As of
December
31, 2009

Cash

1,317.9

44.1

(57.3)

-

24.3

(18.6)

1,310.4

Cash equivalents

2,531.7

1,797.1

(20.7)

1.3

(0.4)

(5.0)

4,304.0

Cash & cash equivalents

3,849.6

1,841.2

(78.0)

1.3

23.9

(23.6)

5,614.4

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

465.7

(3.4)

(6.4)

 

(1.4)

0.4

454.9

Net cash

3,383.9

1,844.6

(71.6)

1.3

25.3

(24.0)

5,159.5


(1)

Fair value adjustments are recorded in financial income and expenses.


Cash and cash equivalents of -€23.7 million were transferred to “Assets classified as held for sale” in 2009.



F-55


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Fair value adjustments

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2006

Cash

1,173.1

(81.3)

196.5

-

(23.0)

(1.5)

1,263.8

Cash equivalents

1,163.0

222.2

5.0

0.4

0.4

3.2

1,394.2

Cash and cash equivalents

2,336.1

140.9

201.5

0.4

(22.6)

1.7

2,658.0


Amounts transferredBack to Non-current assets held for sale totaled €0.5 million in 2006.Contents


Changes in consolidation scope mainly concern primarily concerned the acquisitionfollowing disposals:

Transportation:sale of SNCMFreight activities for €100.7 million- €32.2 million.

Environmental Services: sale of the VPNM sub-group for -€38.6 million.

Water: change in the Transportation Division, acquisitionsconsolidation method (from full to proportionate consolidation) in the Water Division for €40.8 million (in Germany and China) and acquisitions in the Waste Management Division for €38.5 million (BelgiumNorth Africa and the United Kingdom).Middle East for -€10.2 million.

As of December 31, 2006,2009, the Water Division held cash of €517.4€477.5 million, the Environmental Services Division held cash of €182.9 million, the Energy Services Division held cash of €219.1 million, the Waste Management Division held cash of €214.4€280.4 million, the Transportation Division held cash of €141.8€158.6 million, Veolia Environnement SA held cash of €43.8€41.4 million and the other head office entitiescertain subsidiaries (primarily insurance) held cash of €117.0€169.6 million.

Investment supports used by the Group include UCITS (Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities), negotiable debt instruments (bank certificates of deposit and treasury notes with a maturity of less than three months) and monetary notes.

Surplus cash balances of other Group subsidiaries, not pooled at Veolia Environnement SA level, are invested in accordance with procedures defined by the Group. Note 29.3.2 – Management of liquidity risk, presents a breakdown of investments by nature.

As of December 31, 2006,2009, cash equivalents were primarily held by Veolia Environnement SA in the amount of €1,096.8€4,049.8 million (including cash mutual fund investmentsincluding monetary UCITS of €823.0€3,037.9 million, negotiable debt instruments (bank certificates of deposit and treasury notes with a maturity of €203.8 million).less than three months) of €375.2 million, monetary notes of €385.0 million and term deposit accounts of €250.0 million. Cash equivalents are accounted for as assets designated at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement.


Bank overdrafts and other cash position items consist of credit balances on bank accounts and related accrued interest payable, corresponding to brief overdrafts.

Reminder: MovementsRecap: movements in cash and cash equivalents during 2005:2008 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December
31,2007

Changes in
business

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Fair value
adjustments (1)

Foreign
exchange
translation

Other

As of
December
31, 2008

Cash

1,449.5

(119.0)

16.2

-

(24.7)

(4.1)

1,317.9

Cash equivalents

1,666.1

845.1

13.0

-

(2.9)

10.4

2,531.7

Cash & cash equivalents

3,115.6

726.1

29.2

-

(27.6)

6.3

3,849.6

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

459.4

32.7

18.1

 

(6.0)

(38.5)

465.7

Net cash

2,656.2

693.4

11.1

 

(21.6)

44.8

3,383.9


(1)

Fair value adjustments are recorded in financial income and expenses.


Cash and cash equivalents of €1.8 million were transferred to “Assets classified as held for sale” in 2008, compared to €0.3 million in 2007.

As of December 31, 2008, the Water Division held cash of €492.0 million, the Environmental Services Division held cash of €204.2 million, the Energy Services Division held cash of €268.5 million, the Transportation Division held cash of €176.2 million, Veolia Environnement SA held cash of €3.3 million and certain subsidiaries (primarily insurance) held cash of €173.7 million.

As of December 31, 2008, cash equivalents were primarily held by Veolia Environnement SA in the amount of €2,280.2 million including non-dynamic monetary UCITS of €586.0 million, negotiable debt instruments (bank certificates of deposit and treasury notes with a maturity of less than three months) of €955.8 million and monetary notes of €729.2 million. Cash equivalents are accounted for as assets designated at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement.

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items consist of credit balances on bank accounts and related accrued interest payable, corresponding to brief overdrafts. The contributors in 2008 are the Water Division (€210.7 million), the Environmental Services Division (€99.1 million), the Energy Services Division (€77.9 million), the Transportation Division (€43.4 million) and other (€34.6 million).



F-56


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Fair value adjustments

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

Cash

948.4

64.4

107.4

-

55.9

(3.0)

1,173.1

Cash equivalents

3,711.9

(2,565.7)

31.6

1.3

(27.8)

11.7

1,163.0

Cash and cash equivalents

4,660.3

(2,501.3)

139.0

1.3

28.1

8.7

2,336.1


The overall decreaseBack to Contents


NOTE 15

Equity

15.1

Share capital management objectives, policies and procedures

Veolia Environnement manages its share capital within the framework of a prudent and rigorous financial policy that seeks to ensure easy access to French and international capital markets, to enable investment in projects that create value and provide shareholders with a satisfactory remuneration, while maintaining a credit rating in excess of BBB.

This policy has led Veolia Environnement to define a debt coverage ratio: Net debt / (Operating cash flow before changes in working capital + principal payments on operating financial assets) of between 3.5 and 4.

Net debt represents gross borrowings (non-current borrowings, current borrowings, bank overdrafts and other cash position items), less cash and cash equivalents in 2005 was mainly dueand excluding fair value adjustments to derivatives hedging debt.

15.2

Total equity attributable to owners of the saleCompany

15.2.1

Share capital

The share capital is fully paid up.

Share capital increases

On July 10, 2007, Veolia Environnement performed a share capital increase for cash with retention of certificates of depositspreferential subscription rights in the amount of €2,151€2,558.1 million and the sale(after offset of monetary UCITS in the amountshare capital increase costs of €610€23.3 million to finance the repayment of the OCEANE bonds on January 1, 2005 (€1,535 million), the redemption of the TSAR subordinated loan notes redeemable in preference shares on March 31, 2005 and Water Division investments (acquisition of Braunschweig on January 10, 2005 for €374 million)against additional paid-in capital).

Changes in consolidation scope mainly concern the acquisition of the water services company serving the town of Braunschweig in Germany in the amount of €45 million.


Reminder: Movements in cash and cash equivalents during 2004:


(€ millions)

As of January 1,2004 adjusted

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Fair value adjustments

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Cash

1,015.2

(147.9)

54.5

-

4.3

22.3

948.4

Cash equivalents

1,862.8

1,885.2

31.6

-

8.8

(76.5)

3,711.9

Cash and cash equivalents

2,878.0

1,737.3

86.1

-

13.1

(54.2)

4,660.3




Back to contents






Note 17

Equity


(€ millions)

Number of shares outstanding

Share capital

Additional
paid-in capital

Treasury shares

Consolidated reserves and retained earnings

Foreign exchange translation reserves

Fair value reserves

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

Minority interests

Total equity

As of January 1, 2004 adjusted

405,070,515

2,025.3

6,449.1

(298.6)

(4,850.9)

-

(65.7)

3,259.2

1,646.4

4,905.6

Issue of share capital of the parent company

1,351,468

6.8

18.5

-

-

-

-

25.3

-

25.3

Elimination of treasury shares

 

-

-

(160.7)

 

-

-

(160.7)

-

(160.7)

Share purchase and subscription option plans

 

-

-

-

6.9

-

-

6.9

-

6.9

Third party share in share capital increases by subsidiaries and changes in consolidation scope

 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

88.6

88.6

Parent company dividend distribution

 

-

-

-

(217.9)

-

-

(217.9)

-

(217.9)

Third party share in dividend distributions by subsidiaries

 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(144.2)

(144.2)

Foreign exchange translation adjustments

 

-

-

-

-

(72.1)

-

(72.1)

10.9

(61.2)

Fair value adjustments

 

-

-

-

-

-

(13.9)

(13.9)

(9.9)

(23.8)

Actuarial gains or losses on pension obligations

 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Net income for the year

 

-

-

-

389.8

-

-

389.8

133.3

523.1

Other changes

 

-

-

-

(5.4)

-

-

(5.4)

3.6

(1.8)

As of December 31, 2004 adjusted

406,421,983

2,032.1

6,467.6

(459.3)

(4,677.5)

(72.1)

(79.6)

3,211.2

1,728.7

4,939.9

Issue of share capital of the parent company

1,450,623

7.3

31.5

-

8.6

-

-

47.4

-

47.4

Elimination of treasury shares

 

-

-

6.6

2.6

-

-

9.2

-

9.2

Share purchase and subscription option plans

 

-

-

-

16.2

-

-

16.2

-

16.2

Third party share in share capital increases by subsidiaries and changes in consolidation scope

 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

80.0

80.0

Parent company dividend distribution

 

-

-

-

(265.4)

-

-

(265.4)

-

(265.4)

Third party share in dividend distributions by subsidiaries

 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(108.6)

(108.6)

Foreign exchange translation adjustments

 

-

-

-

-

284.4

-

284.4

33.6

318.0

Fair value adjustments

 

-

-

-

-

-

9.7

9.7

1.6

11.3





Back to contents




(€ millions)

Number of shares outstanding

Share capital

Additional
paid-in capital

Treasury shares

Consolidated reserves and retained earnings

Foreign exchange translation reserves

Fair value reserves

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

Minority interests

Total equity

Actuarial gains or losses on pension obligations

 

-

-

-

(132.5)

-

-

(132.5)

(12.2)

(144.7)

Net income for the year

 

-

-

-

622.2

-

-

622.2

172.9

795.1

Other changes

 

-

-

-

(26.3)

0

14.1

(12.2)

(8.0)

(20.2)

As of December 31, 2005 adjusted

407,872,606

2,039.4

6,499.1

(452.7)

(4,452.1)

212.3

(55.8)

3,790.2

1,888.0

5,678.2

Issue of share capital of the parent company

4,753,944

23.7

142.1

 

15.8

  

181.6

-

181.6

Elimination of treasury shares

   

(26.9)

25.8

  

(1.1)

-

(1.1)

Share purchase and subscription option plans

    

16.7

  

16.7

-

16.7

Third party share in share capital increases by subsidiaries and changes in consolidation scope

       

-

158.8

158.8

Parent company dividend distribution

    

(336.3)

  

(336.3)

 

(336.3)

Third party share in dividend distributions by subsidiaries

       

-

(142.9)

(142.9)

Foreign exchange translation adjustments

     

(106.8)

0.5

(106.3)

6.2

(100.1)

Fair value adjustments

    

0.2

 

33.2

33.4

1.3

34.7

Actuarial gains or losses on pension obligations

    

26.4

  

26.4

(0.8)

25.6

Net income for the year

    

758.7

  

758.7

236.2

994.9

Other changes

    

(41.9)

39.1

0.3

(2.5)

45.8

43.3

As of December 31, 2006

412,626,550

2,063.1

6,641.2

(479.6)

(3,986.7)

144.6

(21.8)

4,360.8

2,192.6

6,553.4


The dividend distribution per share was €0.85, €0.68 and €0.55 in 2006, 2005 and 2004 respectively.

The dividend proposed to the General Assembly of 10 May 2007 is €1.05 per share.


17.1

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

17.1.1

Share capital:

Share capital increases:

In 2004,addition in 2007, Veolia Environnement carried outperformed a share capital increase of €25.3 million, subscribed by members of the Group employee savings plan in France and abroad.

In 2005, Veolia Environnement carried out a share capital increase of €34.6€156.2 million, subscribed by members of the Group employee savings plan in France and abroad. The discount on the issue price was expensed in the amount of €8.6€33.8 million.

In addition,Furthermore, the share capital was increased by €4.2€119.7 million (including additional paid-in capital) following the exercise of share purchase and subscription option plans.options.

As of December 31, 2006, theIn 2008, Veolia Environnement performed a share capital was increased by €92.9increase of €22 million (including additional paid-in capital) following the exercise of share purchase and subscription option plans and by €70.7 million (including additional paid-in capital) followingoptions.

In 2009, Veolia Environnement performed a share capital increase of €322 million on the payment of scrip dividends. As decided by the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of May 7, 2009, the Group offered shareholders a choice of payment of the dividend in cash or shares. Shareholders elected for the payment of 58% of dividends in shares, leading to the creation of 20,111,683 shares, representing just over 4.25% of the share capital and 4.39% of voting rights.

In addition in 2009, Veolia performed a share capital increase (including additional-paid-in capital) reserved for employees (Group employee savings plan) of €19.4 million (excluding issuance costs). TheA discount was not granted on the issue price was expensed in the amount of €15.8 million.subscription price.

In addition, theFinally, Veolia Environnement performed a share capital was increased by €2.2increase of €0.7 million (including additional paid-in capital) following the exercise of share subscription warrants.options.

Number of shares outstanding:outstanding and par value:

405,070,515The number of shares were outstanding as of January 1, 2004, 406,421,983is 471,762,756 shares as of December 31, 2004, 407,872,6062007, 472,576,666 shares as of December 31, 20052008 and 412,626,550493,630,374 shares as of December 31, 20062009 (including treasury shares) for nominal. The par value of each share is €5.



F-57





Back to contentsContents



17.1.215.2.2

Offset of treasury shares against equity:equity

In 2004, 516,899 treasury shares were sold as part of2007, the Onyx Ireland minority interest buyout transaction.

As of December 31, 2004, the Group held 16,183,548 of its own shares.

In 2005, 193,306 shares with a net carrying amount of €9.2 million were sold as part of transactions reserved for employees. As of December 31, 2005, the Group held 15,990,242 of its own shares.

In 2006, 3,424,934 shares were sold and the call sold covering 2,700,000decrease in treasury shares was repurchased-133,654 shares, for a net carrying amount of €105.8 million as part of transactions reserved for employees. At the same time, Veolia Environnement purchased 2,689,000 treasury shares for a total consideration of €106.9 million and sold a call for 1,400,000 shares.€3.2 million. As of December 31, 2006,2007, the Group held 15,254,30815,120,654 of its own shares.

In 2008, the net decrease in treasury shares was -140,620 shares, for a net carrying amount of €3.2 million. As of December 31, 2008, the Group held 14,980,034 of its own shares.

In 2009, Veolia Environnement transferred 109,533 shares as consideration for an external growth transaction performed by a subsidiary for an amount of €1.9 million and 138,909 shares as part of the share capital increase reserved for employees; as of December 31, 2009, the Group held 14,731,592 of its own shares.

17.1.315.2.3

Share purchase and subscription option plants:options

In accordance with IFRS 2, an expense of €16.2€15.6 million in 2005 and €16.72007, €5.5 million in 20062008 million and €10.9 million in 2009 was recognized in respect of share option plans granted to employees.

17.1.415.2.4

Appropriation of net income and dividend distribution:distribution

A dividend distribution of €336.3€553.8 million was paid in 2006 out of 2005distributed by Veolia Environnement SA. 2008 net income attributable to equity holdersowners of the parentCompany of €622.2 million. The residual balance of €285.9€405.1 million was transferredappropriated in full to Veolia Environnement consolidated reserves.the distribution of dividends.

17.1.515.2.5

Foreign exchange translation reserves:

Accumulated foreign exchange translation reserves were transferred on January 1, 2004 to consolidated reserves, in accordance with the option adopted by the Group on first-time adoption of IFRS.

In 2004, foreign exchange translation adjustments attributable to equity holders of the parent (€-72.1 million) included €11.2 million relating to the reversal of foreign exchange translation adjustments, net of tax, on discontinued operations of the Water Division in the United States. Other movements totaled €-83.3 million and mainly concerned the U.S. dollar (€-75.6 million).

In 2005, positive translation differences of €284.4 million (portion attributable to equity holders of the parent) concerned the U.S. dollar in the amount of €113.5 million.

Accumulated foreign exchange translation reserves as of December 31, 2005January 1, 2007 are positive: €212.3 million (portion attributable to equity holders of the parent), including €49.1 million related to the U.S. dollar and €41.7 million related to the Korean won.

In 2006, negative translation differences of €106.3 million (portion attributable to equity holders of the parent) concerned the U.S. dollarpositive in the amount of €95.0 million.

Accumulated foreign exchange translation reserves as of December 31, 2006 are positive: €144.6 million (portion attributable to equity holdersowners of the parent)Company), including €32.6 million related to the Korean won, €60.4 million related to the pound sterling, €68.8 million related to the Czech crown and €-45.9-€45.9 million related to the U.S. dollar.

In 2007, translation losses of -€263.7 million (portion attributable to owners of the Company) concerned the U.S. dollar in the amount of -€80.3 million, the pound sterling in the amount of -€122.2 million and the Chinese renminbi yuan in the amount of -€41.9 million.

Accumulated foreign exchange translation reserves as of December 31, 2007 are negative in the amount of -€119.1 million (portion attributable to owners of the Company), including -€126.2 million related to the U.S. dollar, -€61.8 million related to the pound sterling, €80.7 million related to the Czech crown and -€46.0 million related to the Chinese renminbi yuan.

In 2008, translation losses of -€313.8 million (portion attributable to owners of the Company) primarily concerned the pound sterling in the amount of -€324.1 million, the U.S. dollar in the amount of €74.4 million and the Chinese renminbi yuan in the amount of €156.1 million.

Accumulated foreign exchange translation reserves as of December 31, 2008 are negative in the amount of -€432.9 million (portion attributable to owners of the Company), including -€51.8 million related to the U.S. dollar, -€385.9 million related to the pound sterling, €74 million related to the Czech crown and €110.1 million related to the Chinese renminbi yuan.

In 2009, translation gains of €88.5 million (portion attributable to equity owners of the Company) concerned the U.S. dollar in the amount of -€57.5 million, the pound sterling in the amount of +€65.8 million, the Chinese renminbi yuan in the amount of -€85.0 million and the Australian dollar in the amount of +€60.0 million.

The increase in foreign exchange translation reserves primarily reflects the appreciation of the pound sterling and Australian dollar against the euro in 2009, while the U.S. dollar and Chinese renminbi yuan depreciated against the euro. Movements in Foreignforeign exchange translation reserves are nonetheless significantly reduced by the Group policy of securing borrowings in the local currency.



F-58



Back to Contents


Movements in foreign exchange translation reserves (attributable to equity holdersowners of the parentCompany and minorityto non-controlling interests):


(€ millions)

Total

Attributable to equity holders of the parent

Translation differences of the financial statements of subsidiaries drawn up in a foreign currency

(40.0)

(51.0)

Translation differences on net iinvestments

(21.2)

(21.1)

As of December 31, 2004 adjusted

(61.2)

(72.1)

Translation differences of the financial statements of subsidiaries drawn up in a foreign currency

291.6

246.4

Translation differences on net investments

(35.0)

(34.1)

As of December 31, 2005 adjusted

256.6

212.3

Translation differences of the financial statements of subsidiaries drawn up in a foreign currency

(53.8)

(59.9)

Translation differences on net investments

(7.8)

(7.8)

Movements during  2006

(61.6)

(67.7)

Translation differences of the financial statements of subsidiaries drawn up in a foreign currency

237.8

186.5

Translation differences on net investments

(42.8)

(41.9)

As of December 31, 2006

195.0

144.6






Back to contents


(€ million)

Total

o/w attributable to owners of the Company

Translation differences on the financial statements of subsidiaries drawn up in a foreign currency

(26.1)

(84.8)

Translation differences on net foreign investments

(36.8)

(34.3)

As of December 31, 2007

(62.9)

(119.1)

Translation differences on the financial statements of subsidiaries drawn up in a foreign currency

(333.0)

(379.8)

Translation differences on net foreign investments

(52.8)

(53.1)

As of December 31, 2008

(385.8)

(432.9)

Translation differences on the financial statements of subsidiaries drawn up in a foreign currency

73.2

82.5

Translation differences on net foreign investments

6.2

6.0

Movements in 2009

79.4

88.5

Translation differences on the financial statements of subsidiaries drawn up in a foreign currency

(259.8)

(297.2)

Translation differences on net foreign investments

(46.6)

(47.2)

As of December 31, 2009

(306.4)

(344.4)


Breakdown by currency of Foreign exchange translation reserves attributable to equity holdersowners of the parent:Company:

(€ million)

As of
December 31,2007

As of
December 31, 2008

Movement

As of
December 31, 2009

Pound sterling

(61.8)

(385.9)

65.8

(320.1)

Chinese renminbi yuan

(46.0)

110.1

(85.0)

25.1

Czech crown

80.7

74.0

7.6

81.6

U.S. dollar

(126.2)

(51.8)

(57.5)

(109.3)

Australian dollar

(0.7)

(45.5)

60.0

14.5

Korean won

8.8

(32.3)

4.9

(27.4)

Polish zloty

11.3

(24.7)

16.0

(8.7)

Hong Kong dollar

16.3

(24.5)

18.8

(5.7)

Norwegian crown

2.4

(17.9)

16.1

(1.8)

Romanian leu

4.9

(7.1)

(5.3)

(12.4)

Canadian dollar

7.7

(4.8)

9.4

4.6

Swedish krona

(5.6)

(3.9)

16.7

12.8

Hungarian florint

2.7

(3.4)

(1.4)

(4.8)

Mexican peso

2.0

(1.1)

(6.7)

(7.8)

Egyptian pound

(0.6)

(0.8)

0.2

(0.6)

Other currencies

(15.0)

(13.3)

28.9

15.6

Total

(119.1)

(432.9)

88.5

(344.4)




F-59


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

Movement

As of December 31, 2006

U.S. Dollar

(64.4)

49.1

(95.0)

(45.9)

Pound Sterling

8.2

33.1

27.3

60.4

Korean Won

5.9

41.7

(9.1)

32.6

Chinese Yuan

(12.2)

28.3

(32.4)

(4.1)

Czech Crown

2.2

18.3

50.5

68.8

Canadian Dollar

(0.7)

10.0

(8.1)

1.9

Australian Dollar

(5.5)

6.9

(5.9)

1.0

Swedish Krona

1.6

(5.0)

6.5

1.5

Norwegian Crown

 

2.0

(2.6)

(0.6)

Hungarian Forint

 

2.1

1.3

3.4

Polish Zloty

 

4.7

0.5

5.2

Romanian Leu

 

4.9

9.0

13.9

Mexican Peso

(1.4)

2.7

(1.1)

1.6

Egyptian Pound

 

3.7

(3.3)

0.4

Hong Kong Dollar

 

1.8

6.4

8.2

Other currencies

(5.8)

8.0

(11.7)

(3.7)

Total

(72.1)

212.3

(67.7)

144.6


Back to Contents


17.1.615.2.6

Fair value reserves:reserves

Fair value reserves attributable to equity holdersowners of the parent,Company are negative in the amount of €79.6 million as of January 1, 2005, €55.8€21.6 million as of December 31, 2005 and €21.82007, -€79.2 million as of December 31, 2006.

As2008 and -€43.5 million as of December 31, 2006, fair value reserves mainly include fair value adjustments2009.

(€ million)

Available-for sale securities

Commodity derivatives hedging cash flows

Foreign currency derivatives hedging cash flows

Interest rate derivatives hedging cash flows

Total

o/w Attributable to owners of the Company

As of December 31, 2007

34.4

1.0

0.8

(16.1)

20.1

21.6

Fair value adjustments

(18.5)

(32.9)

(0.6)

(60.1)

(112.1)

(101.6)

Other movements

0.1

4.1

-

0.9

5.1

0.8

As of December 31, 2008

16.0

(27.8)

0.2

(75.3)

(86.9)

(79.2)

Fair value adjustments

(4.0)

22.3

3.4

17.7

39.4

38.6

Other movements

 

(4.0)

0.5

0.3

(3.2)

(2.9)

As of December 31, 2009

12.0

(9.5)

4.1

(57.3)

(50.7)

(43.5)

Amounts are presented net of tax

No material amounts were released to interest-rate derivatives hedging floating-rate borrowings (-€21.9 million) and to a lesser extent, fair value adjustments to available-for- sale securities (€0.1 million).

Movements in fair value reserves (attributable to equity holders of the parent and minority interests):


(€ millions)

Total

Attributable to equity holders of the parent

As of January 1, 2006

  

Fair value adjustments on available-for-sale assets

3.0

3.0

Derivative instruments – cash flow hedges

(60.7)

(58.8)

Opening fair value reserves as of January 1, 2006

(57.7)

(55.8)

Fair value adjustments:

  

Fair value adjustments on available-for-sale assets

(2.3)

(2.9)

Derivative instruments – cash flow hedges

37.0

36.3

Fair value adjustments during 2006

34.7

33.4

Other changes:

 

-

Fair value adjustments on available-for-sale assets

-

-

Derivative instruments – cash flow hedges

0.6

0.6

Other adjustments during 2006

0.6

0.6

As of December 31, 2006

  

Fair value adjustments on available-for-sale assets

0.7

0.1

Derivative instruments – cash flow hedges

(23.1)

(21.9)

Closing fair value reserves as of December 31, 2006

(22.4)

(21.8)


17.1.7

Other changes:

In 2006, other changes mainly concerned purchase price allocationsConsolidated Income Statement in respect of a subsidiary.

In 2005, they mainly concerned the exercise of a put option.


interest rate derivatives hedging cash flows and recorded in finance costs and income.

17.215.3

MinorityNon-controlling interests

A break downbreakdown of the movement in minoritynon-controlling interests is presented in the Statement of changesChanges in shareholders' equity.


Equity.

The increase in minoritynon-controlling interests in 2006 was2009 is due to the dividend distribution for -€202.0 million, offset by the net income for the year of €257.8 million and the various share capital increases for €149.8 million.

The decrease in non-controlling interests in 2008 is mainly due to the consolidation of Asian companiesshare capital reduction performed by the company carrying the Berlin contract in the Water Division (+€60.6 million),for -€131.2 million and the acquisitiondistribution of minority interestsdividends for -€200.8 million, partially offset by the ERBD in Central Europe innet income for the Transportation Division (+€40.3 million) and the acquisition by IFMyear of an interest in the share capital of Zec Lodz in Dalkia (+€47 million). Other movements mainly concern the definitive allocation of the purchase price for Dalkia’s Polish subsidiaries (+€33.5 million).



€304.1 million.




Back to contents


NOTE 16


Note 18

Non-current and current provisions

Pursuant to IAS 37 (see Note 1.13)1.14), provisions maturing after more than one year are discounted. Discount rates used were as follows:

Discount rates

 

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31,2008

As of
December 31,2007

Euro

   

2 to 5 years

2.49%

5.67%

5.27%

6 to 10 years

4.14%

5.97%

5.52%

More than ten years

5.59%

6.65%

6.04%

U.S. Dollar

   

2 to 5 years

2.24%

4.95%

4.35%

6 to 10 years

4.67%

5.75%

4.94%

More than ten years

5.92%

6.82%

5.84%

Pound Sterling

   

2 to 5 years

2.26%

6.13%

5.51%

6 to 10 years

4.43%

6.40%

5.66%

More than ten years

5.68%

6.46%

5.88%


The discount rate calculation methodology is presented in Note 2, Use of management estimates in the application of Group accounting standards.


 

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Euro

   

2 to 5 years

4.37%

3.25%

3.23%

6 to 10 years

4.60%

3.88%

4.79%

After ten years

5.20%

4.32%

5.16%

U.S Dollar

   

2 to 5 years

5.20%

5.16%

2.84%

6 to 10 years

5.36%

5.55%

4.79%

After ten years

5.86%

5.79%

5.16%

Pound Sterling

   

2 to 5 years

5.60%

4.88%

5.42%

6 to 10 years

5.56%

5.11%

5.67%

After ten years

5.60%

5.10%

5.67%



F-60



Back to Contents


Movements innon-current provisions during20062009: are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December
31,2008

Addition /
charge

Repayment /
Utilization
during the
year

Reversal

Actuarial
gains
(losses)

Unwinding
of discount

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign
exchange
translation

Non-current /
current
reclassification

Other

As of
December
31, 2009

Tax litigations

126.0

45.7

(27.9)

(3.2)

-

(0.1)

-

-

(28.9)

11.7

123.3

Employee litigations

9.3

2.7

(0.3)

(0.5)

-

0.1

(0.2)

-

(0.8)

0.4

10.7

Other litigations

76.2

31.0

(4.7)

(4.4)

-

2.0

-

(0.2)

(10.4)

8.4

97.9

Contractual commitments

248.6

186.1

(173.3)

(1.3)

-

1.4

-

-

-

6.2

267.7

Provisions for work-in-progress & losses to completion on LT contracts

226.6

33.9

(10.0)

(1.7)

-

10.6

0.8

0.9

(41.0)

(4.9)

215.2

Closure and post-closure costs

520.4

19.6

(5.9)

(10.5)

-

111.1

9.8

3.5

(37.1)

(3.0)

607.9

Restructuring provisions

1.2

0.2

(0.1)

(0.3)

-

-

-

-

(0.2)

-

0.8

Self-insurance provisions

126.7

59.4

(53.8)

(0.6)

-

2.9

-

(0.3)

(21.2)

(0.4)

112.7

Other

97.0

16.6

(22.1)

(3.9)

-

1.5

(1.2)

-

(12.7)

1.7

76.9

Non-current provisions excl. pensions and other employee benefits

1,432.0

395.2

(298.1)

(26.4)

-

129.5

9.2

3.9

(152.3)

20.1

1 513.1

Provisions for pensions and other employee benefits

728.2

89.1

(101.3)

(31.0)

68.5

38.3

(7.9)

14.1

-

(20.0)

778.0

Non-current provisions

2,160.2

484.3

(399.4)

(57.4)

68.5

167.8

1.3

18.0

(152.3)

0.1

2,291.1


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

Addition

Utilization

Actuarial gains (losses)

Reversal

Unwinding of discount

Changes in consolid-ation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2006

 

Tax litigations

50.9

23.0

(7.3)

-

-

(0.5)

-

-

(0.8)

65.3

Employee litigations

2.2

1.5

(1.0)

-

(0.1)

0.2

-

-

0.4

3.2

Other litigations

64.6

27.1

(13.7)

-

(3.0)

0.2

13.3

(0.6)

6.6

94.5

Contractual commitments

295.8

163.7

(163.6)

-

(1.1)

-

0.2

-

(7.2)

287.8

Provisions for work-in-progress & losses to completion on LT contracts

47.7

68.6

(3.0)

-

(1.0)

(0.1)

206.2

(0.9)

(15.9)

301.6

Closure and post-closure costs

306.3

12.5

(13.6)

-

(13.8)

16.0

84.2

(5.3)

11.5

397.8

Restructuring expenses

-

-

-

-

-

-

23.2

-

-

23.2

Subsidiary risks

1.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(0.3)

0.9

Warranties and customer care

114.6

49.4

(20.9)

-

(2.4)

-

1.8

(1.2)

0.8

142.1

Other

99.0

25.0

(13.9)

-

(4.2)

0.6

42.0

(0.6)

(16.7)

131.2

Non-current provisions excl. pensions and other employee benefits

982.3

370.8

(237.0)

-

(25.6)

16.4

370.9

(8.6)

(21.6)

1,447.6

Provisions for pensions and other employee benefits*

665.7

74.8

(83.2)

(37.1)

(2.7)

-

108.1

(0.8)

24.2

749.0

Non-current provisions

1,648.0

445.6

(320.2)

(37.1)

(28.3)

16.4

479.0

(9.4)

2.6

2,196.6

* See Note 34.Movements in current provisions during2009 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December
31,2008

Charge

Utilization

Reversal

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign
exchange
translation

Non-current /
current
reclassification

Other

As of
December
31, 2009

Tax litigations

63.2

18.2

(20.9)

(35.5)

(0.7)

0.1

28.9

(9.1)

44.2

Employee litigations

28.7

11.9

(8.6)

(3.4)

(5.3)

0.1

0.8

0.3

24.5

Other litigations

113.0

46.6

(26.1)

(19.6)

(0.3)

(0.5)

10.5

(6.8)

116.8

Provisions for work-in-progress & losses to completion on LT contracts

158.8

85.2

(94.8)

(10.1)

1.3

2.7

41.0

(35.7)

148.4

Closure and post-closure costs

68.7

12.1

(37.8)

(1.7)

(2.8)

1.5

37.1

1.3

78.4

Restructuring provisions

26.6

5.3

(18.6)

(3.3)

(0.1)

0.2

0.2

(1.4)

8.9

Self-insurance provisions

106.0

84.1

(70.4)

(2.7)

0.6

(1.0)

21.2

(2.7)

135.1

Other

208.1

122.5

(102.4)

(33.2)

(5.6)

1.7

12.6

(10.8)

192.9

Current provisions

773.1

385.9

(379.6)

(109.5)

(12.9)

4.8

152.3

(64.9)

749.2




F-61



Back to contentsContents



Movements incurrent provisions during 2006:


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

Addition

Utilization

Reversal

Changes in consolid-ation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2006

 

Tax litigations

46.5

23.4

(18.4)

(2.6)

0.1

(0.1)

(0.3)

48.6

Employee litigations

18.4

12.3

(6.5)

(1.8)

(0.3)

-

1.4

23.5

Other litigations

142.1

39.1

(58.1)

(14.8)

-

(0.8)

(3.6)

103.9

Provisions for work-in-progress & losses to completion on LT contracts

111.3

55.6

(92.1)

(3.4)

67.1

(1.7)

28.4

165.2

Provisions for property, plant and equipment

1.5

2.5

(1.5)

-

-

-

-

2.5

Closure and post-closure costs

53.4

7.1

(17.1)

(2.7)

2.8

(2.6)

19.0

59.9

Restructuring expenses

21.8

15.6

(18.8)

(1.9)

29.9

-

(0.5)

46.1

Subsidiary risks

18.9

3.0

(5.0)

(1.3)

(0.5)

-

0.4

15.5

Warranties and customer care

145.0

60.5

(50.8)

(6.6)

0.5

(5.7)

(3.4)

139.5

Other

195.1

117.9

(86.0)

(34.9)

8.5

(1.8)

22.4

221.2

Current provisions

754.0

337.0

(354.3)

(70.0)

108.1

(12.7)

63.8

825.9


No amounts were transferred to Non-current assets held for sale in 2006 or 2005.


Movements in non-currentcurrent and currentnon-current provisions break down as follows:


Litigation

This provision covers all losses that are considered probable and that relate to litigation (taxation, employee or other) arising in the normal course of Veolia Environnement’s business operations.

The Water, Energy Services and EnergyEnvironmental Services Divisions account for the majority of the provisions (€204.5220.7 million, €85.2 million and €68.6€57.0 million respectively).


Contractual commitments

As part of its obligations under public services contracts, the GroupVeolia Environnement generally assumes responsibility for the maintenance and repair of installations of the publicly-owned utility networksinstallations it manages. The resulting maintenance and repair costs are analyzed in accordance with IAS 37 on provisions and, where necessary, a provision for contractual commitments is recorded where there is outstanding work to be performed. These provisions total €267.7 million and primarily relate to the Water and Energy Services Divisions in the amount of €200.1€174.1 million and €87.6€93.6 million respectively.


Work-in-progress and losses to completion on long-term contracts

The principalAs of December 31, 2009, these provisions relate to engineering activities ofmainly concerned the Water Division (€86.9 million)(primarily engineering and construction activities) in the Transportation Division (€350.4 million). Changes in consolidation scope mainly concern the entry into the scopeamount of consolidation of SNCM for €265.4 million. The addition for the year mainly concerns a railway contract in€113.7 million, the Transportation Division in Germany.the amount of €142 million and the Environmental Services Division in the amount of €100.7 million.


These provisions also include warranty and customer care provisions in the engineering and construction businesses.

Closure and post-closure costs

This provision encompasses the legal and contractual obligations of the Group on the completion of operating activities at a site (primarily site restoration provisions) and, more generally, expenditure associated with environmental protection as defined in the ethics charter of each entity (provision for environmental risks).

These provisions total €686.3 million and primarily concern the Environmental Services Division in the amount of €610.6 million in 2009, compared to €508.9 million in 2008 and €532.1 million in 2007 and the Energy Services Division in the amount of €58.8 million in 2009, compared to €63.8 million in 2008 and €55.6 million in 2007.

The Group has financialincrease in these provisions is mainly due to the unwinding of the discount in the Environmental Services Division in the amount of €110.3 million.

Provisions for site restoration cover obligations relating to closure and post-closure costs for theat waste disposal facilities it operates oroperated by the Group and for which it is otherwise responsible. The Group provides for these estimated futureThese provisions primarily concern the Environmental Services Division. Forecast site restoration costs are provided pro rata to waste tonnage deposited over the authorized duration of the sites.

Forsites and totaled €622.7 million at the Waste Managementend of 2009, including €567.2 million in respect of the Environmental Services Division these provisions totaled €430.1 million as of December 31, 2006, compared to €335.4€527.4 million asat the end of December 31, 2005. The acquisition2008 and €452.8 million at the end of Cleanaway, new commitments, the unwinding of the discount and the change in discount rates, impacted non-current provisions by €66.0 million, €38.5 million and €16.0 million and €-12.4 million respectively.2007.

Other provisions concern environmental risks in the amount of €48.2 million, compared to €46.5 million in 2008 and €66.0 million in 2007 and plant dismantling and site remediation in the Water, and Energy Services and Environmental Services Divisions in the amount of €15.5 million in 2009, compared to €15.3 million in 2008 and totaled €25.6€18.2 million and €21.9 million asin 2007.

Self-insurance provisions

As of December 31, 20062009, self-insurance provisions totaled €247.8 million and 2005 respectively.

Subsidiary risks

Inwere mainly recorded by Group insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries in the normal courseamount of its activities, Veolia Environnement is required to record provisions to cover risks relating to certain subsidiaries.


Warranties and customer care

These provisions principally relate to captive insurance companies (€109.9€129.2 million, of incurred losses), to the Water Division (€68.4 million) and to the Energy Services Division (€44.9 million).


in the amount of €39.5 million and the Transportation Division in the amount of €39.6 million.

Other

Other provisions include thosevarious obligations recorded as part of the normal operation of the Group’s subsidiaries.




F-62



Back to contentsContents



Pensions and other employee benefits

Provisions for pensions and other employee benefits as of December 31, 20062009 total €749.0€778.0 million, and include provisions for pensions and other post-employment benefits of €626.8€627.8 million (governed by IAS 19 and detailed in Note 34)30, Employee benefit obligation) and provisions for other long-term benefits of €122.2€150.2 million.


Reminder:Recap: Movements innon-current provisions and other debt during 2005:2008 are as follows:


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Addition

Utilization

Actuarial gains (losses)

Reversal

Unwinding of discount

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

 

Tax litigations

16.2

36.6

(2.4)

-

-

0.2

-

0.2

(0.1)

50.7

Employee litigations

5.4

0.9

(2.8)

-

(0.2)

0.1

-

-

(1.1)

2.3

Other litigations

61.1

7.6

(4.5)

-

(0.2)

1.5

4.9

1.3

(7.0)

64.7

Contractual commitments

321.6

156.4

(168.1)

-

(7.3)

-

3.1

1.0

(10.9)

295.8

Provisions for work-in-progress & losses to completion on LT contracts

45.1

15.4

(6.0)

-

(0.3)

0.5

5.1

1.3

(13.4)

47.7

Closure and post-closure costs

262.0

22.6

(4.3)

-

(0.3)

14.2

4.0

12.3

(4.2)

306.3

Restructuring expenses

1.7

-

-

-

(0.3)

-

-

-

(1.4)

-

Subsidiary risks

3.7

0.2

(2.7)

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.2

Warranties and customer care

86.5

38.5

(6.0)

-

(0.2)

0.1

(0.2)

0.3

(4.4)

114.6

Other

64.3

29.7

(11.3)

-

(5.7)

2.6

13.3

1.6

4.5

99.0

Non-current provisions excl. pensions and other employee benefits

867.6

307.9

(208.1)

-

(14.5)

19.2

30.2

18.0

(38.0)

982.3

Non-current provisions for pensions and other employee benefits*

441.0

65.5

(59.4)

184.2

(36.8)

-

37.4

9.8

24.0

665.7

Non-current provisions

1,308.6

373.4

(267.5)

184.2

(51.3)

19.2

67.6

27.8

(14.0)

1,648.0

* See Note 34.

(€ million)

As of
December
31,2007

Addition / charge

Repayment /Utilization

Reversals

Actuarial gains (losses)

Unwinding of discount

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Non-current / current reclassification

Other

As of
December
31, 2008

Tax litigations

95.7

40.6

(19.1)

(0.7)

-

1.6

8.9

(0.9)

(0.6)

0.5

126.0

Employee litigations

10.3

2.7

(1.0)

(2.2)

-

0.1

-

-

(0.6)

-

9.3

Other litigations

78.7

16.5

(4.0)

(11.4)

-

2.3

0.8

0.2

(10.0)

3.1

76.2

Contractual commitments

268.1

177.0

(182.8)

(0.2)

-

-

0.4

-

-

(13.9)

248.6

Provisions for work-in-progress & losses to completion on LT contracts

276.4

23.0

(39.9)

(2.1)

-

12.1

24.1

(2.6)

(64.0)

(0.4)

226.6

Closure and post-closure costs

539.6

0.3

(12.1)

(1.1)

-

39.3

10.3

(20.1)

(34.1)

(1.7)

520.4

Restructuring provisions

1.3

0.2

(0.2)

(0.1)

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.2

Self-insurance provisions

133.8

27.3

(36.9)

(0.2)

-

3.6

(2.6)

1.9

(0.3)

0.1

126.7

Other

89.2

28.1

(9.3)

(9.7)

-

1.9

8.5

(4.7)

(6.3)

(0.7)

97.0

Non-current provisions excl. pensions
and other employee benefits

1,493.1

315.7

(305.3)

(27.7)

-

60.9

50.4

(26.2)

(115.9)

(13.0)

1,432.0

Provisions for pensions and other
employee benefits

645.8

78.5

(84.1)

(14.4)

135.5

21.0

(12.3)

(34.1)

-

(7.7)

728.2

Non-current provisions and other debt

2,138.9

394.2

(389.4)

(42.1)

135.5

81.9

38.1

(60.3)

(115.9)

(20.7)

2,160.2


*

See Note 30, Employee benefit obligation.




F-63



Back to contentsContents



Reminder: Movements innon-current provisions during 2004:


(€ millions)

As of January 1,2004 adjusted

Addition

Utilization

Reversal

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

 

Tax litigations

21.6

2.1

(0.8)

(0.6)

(2.2)

-

(3.9)

16.2

Employee litigations

5.3

1.8

(2.3)

(0.1)

-

-

0.7

5.4

Other litigations

96.9

9.3

(21.4)

(0.2)

(2.6)

0.5

(21.4)

61.1

Contractual commitments

322.7

87.1

(84.0)

(9.9)

4.7

-

1.0

321.6

Provisions for work-in-progress & losses to completion on LT contracts

36.8

6.3

(15.0)

(0.2)

(4.1)

(0.3)

21.6

45.1

Closure and post-closure costs

201.5

16.6

(5.2)

0.4

2.4

(5.3)

51.6

262.0

Restructuring expenses

1.1

-

-

 

-

0.1

0.5

1.7

Subsidiary risks

6.2

-

(2.1)

 

(0.3)

-

(0.1)

3.7

Warranties and customer care

84.1

56.6

(41.0)

(0.6)

(21.8)

(1.8)

11.0

86.5

Other

56.9

66.0

(60.9)

(5.0)

(1.3)

(1.6)

10.2

64.3

Non-current provisions excl. pensions and other employee benefits

833.1

245.8

(232.7)

(16.2)

(25.2)

(8.4)

71.2

867.6

Non-current provisions for pensions and other employee benefits*

431.0

82.8

-

(46.5)

(19.2)

(3.6)

(3.5)

441.0

Non-current provisions

1,264.1

328.6

(232.7)

(62.7)

(44.4)

(12.0)

67.7

1,308.6


Reminder:Recap: Movements incurrent provisions during 2005:2008 are as follows:


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Addition

Utilization

Reversal

Changes in consolidation scope

 Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

 

Tax litigations

46.5

19.2

(19.6)

(6.8)

5.5

0.6

1.0

46.4

Employee litigations

15.3

9.6

(5.9)

(2.0)

-

-

1.5

18.5

Other litigations

131.5

83.4

(67.0)

(5.4)

(4.7)

3.4

0.9

142.1

Provision for work-in-progress & losses to completion on LT contracts

107.6

60.0

(92.1)

(0.3)

14.2

2.0

19.9

111.3

Provisions for property, plant and equipment

8.2

0.4

0.9

(1.4)

1.4

0.1

(8.1)

1.5

Closure and post-closure costs

72.4

4.0

(28.3)

(4.3)

(1.5)

4.1

7.0

53.4

Restructuring expenses

35.9

6.5

(23.8)

(1.8)

2.0

1.3

1.7

21.8

Subsidiary risks

62.6

11.8

(49.6)

(6.1)

-

0.2

-

18.9

Warranties and customer care

90.1

67.8

(55.8)

(0.5)

24.8

8.4

10.2

145.0

Other

130.0

112.0

(58.9)

(12.0)

4.6

4.6

14.8

195.1

Current provisions excl. pensions and other employee benefits

700.1

374.7

(400.1)

(40.6)

46.3

24.7

48.9

754.0

* See Note 34.


Reminder: Movements incurrent provisions during 2004:


(€ millions)

As of January 1,2004 adjusted

Addition

Utilization

Reversal

Changes in consolidation scope

 Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

 

Tax litigations

45.4

23.1

(20.1)

(2.5)

(2.4)

(0.2)

3.2

46.5

Employee litigations

14.5

7.7

(4.8)

(1.8)

(0.1)

-

(0.2)

15.3

Other litigations

113.4

60.5

(59.1)

(4.0)

(5.7)

(2.4)

28.8

131.5

Provision for work-in-progress & losses to completion on LT contracts

80.9

73.8

(58.0)

(3.6)

12.8

(1.4)

3.1

107.6

Provisions for property, plant and equipment

8.6

0.1

(0.4)

-

0.1

-

(0.2)

8.2

Closure and post-closure costs

85.2

60.2

(29.5)

(1.9)

2.2

(0.3)

(43.5)

72.4

Restructuring expenses

46.5

42.0

(41.1)

(7.9)

(4.2)

(0.3)

0.9

35.9

Subsidiary risks

87.1

39.4

(60.6)

(3.1)

(0.7)

0.9

(0.4)

62.6

Warranties and customer care

87.6

59.0

(42.8)

(0.6)

(22.7)

(1.9)

11.5

90.1

Other

122.9

129.4

(119.5)

(22.3)

(2.5)

(3.1)

25.1

130.0

Current provisions excl. pensions and other employee benefits

692.1

495.2

(435.9)

(47.7)

(23.2)

(8.7)

28.3

700.1


(€ million)

As of
December
31,2007

Charge

Utilization

Reversal

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign
exchange
translation

Non-current /
current
reclassification

Other

As of
December
31, 2008

Tax litigations

88.0

25.4

(30.1)

(4.4)

(2.0)

(0.6)

0.6

(13.7)

63.2

Employee litigations

28.7

15.7

(11.5)

(3.6)

(1.2)

(0.1)

0.6

0.1

28.7

Other litigations

125.5

51.9

(29.7)

(39.6)

(0.4)

(0.6)

10.7

(4.8)

113.0

Provisions for work-in-progress & losses to completion on LT contracts

189.8

58.4

(116.3)

(7.9)

(4.2)

(5.2)

64.0

(19.8)

158.8

Closure and post-closure costs

65.9

4.9

(34.5)

(0.3)

(0.8)

(4.4)

34.1

3.8

68.7

Restructuring provisions

32.0

23.0

(21.2)

(7.2)

1.0

(1.0)

-

-

26.6

Self-insurance provisions

100.4

49.3

(40.3)

(2.8)

(1.8)

0.6

0.4

0.2

106.0

Other

195.4

102.2

(70.5)

(39.6)

(0.7)

(4.1)

5.6

19.8

208.1

Current provisions

825.7

330.8

(354.1)

(105.4)

(10.1)

(15.4)

116.0

(14.4)

773.1


NOTE 17

Non-current and current borrowings

 

As of December 31,

(€ million)

Non-current

Current

Total

 

2009

2008

2007

2009

2008

2007

2009

2008

2007

Bonds

13,264.5

11,097.6

9,009.6

36.9

67.7

1,253.8

13,301.4

11,165.3

10,263.4

- maturing in < 1 year

 

-

-

36.9

67.7

1,253.8

36.9

67.7

1,253.8

- maturing in 2-3 years

1,045.2

61.9

122.3

 

-

-

1,045.2

61.9

122.3

- maturing in 4-5 years

2,951.7

2,726.5

1,020.5

 

-

-

2,951.7

2,726.5

1,020.5

- maturing in > 5 years

9,267.6

8,309.2

7,866.8

 

-

-

9,267.6

8,309.2

7,866.8

Other borrowings

4,382.8

5,966.3

4,938.4

2 946.2

3,152.0

2,551.2

7,329.0

9,118.3

7,489.6

- maturing in < 1 year

 

-

-

2 946.2

3,152.0

2,551.2

2,946.2

3,152.0

2,551.2

- maturing in 2-3 years

1,511.1

1,434.3

1,636.4

 

-

-

1,511.1

1,434.3

1,636.4

- maturing in 4-5 years

779.7

1,941.5

1,120.2

 

-

-

779.7

1,941.5

1,120.2

- maturing in > 5 years

2,092.0

2,590.5

2,181.8

 

-

-

2,092.0

2,590.5

2,181.8

Total non-current and current borrowings

17,647.3

17,063.9

13,948.0

2 983.1

3,219.7

3,805.0

20,630.4

20,283.6

17,753.0


17.1

Movements in non-current and current bonds

Movements innon-current andcurrent bonds during 2009 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December
31,2008

Increases /
subscriptions

Repayments

Changes in
consolidation
scope(2)

Fair value
adjustments(1)

Foreign
exchange
translation

Non-current /
current
reclassification

Other

As of
December
31, 2009

Non-current bonds

11,097.6

2,243.0

(0.0)

(39.1)

(2.8)

15.0

(48.3)

(0.9)

13,264.5

Current bonds

67.7

0.0

(72.0)

(7.6)

-

0.7

48.3

(0.2)

36.9

Total bonds

11,165.3

2,243.0

(72.0)

(46.7)

(2.8)

15.7

-

(1.1)

13,301.4


(1)

Fair value adjustments are recorded in financial income and expenses.

(2)

Changes in consolidation scope are mainly due to the sale of incineration activities in the United States in the Environmental Services Division


Non-current borrowings are recorded as financial liabilities at amortized cost for accounting purposes. Hedging transactions were entered into in respect of certain fixed-rate borrowings in 2009. Fair value hedge accounting was applied to these transactions.



F-64



Back to contentsContents



Note 19

Long-term borrowingsNon-current

Long-term borrowings


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

Increases / subscriptions

Repayments

Changes in consolidation scope

Fair value adjustments

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2006

Bonds

7,857.9

1,287.4

(38.3)

-

(138.0)

(40.1)

(511.4)

8,417.5

Other long-term borrowings

5,864.9

865.3

(938.5)

259.6

0.4

(21.2)

(446.4)

5,584.1

Long-term borrowings

13,722.8

2,152.7

(976.8)

259.6

(137.6)

(61.3)

(957.8)

14,001.6

Change in consolidation scope mainly results from Waste division for €131.6 million (effect of acquisition of Cleanaway in United-Kingdom for €128.6 million), Transportation division for €87.8 million (SNCM for €34.1 million) and Water division for 28.3 million.

Amounts transferred to Non-current liabilities held for sale totaled €31.0 million in 2006 compared to nil in 2005.


Long-term bond borrowings bonds break down by maturity as follows:

(€ million)

As of December 31,2007

As of December 31,2008

As of December 31, 2009

Maturity

2 to 3 years

4 to 5 years

> 5 years

Publicly offered or traded issuances (a)

8,191.1

10,290.9

12,511.8

1,012.1

2,779.7

8,720.0

European market (i)

8,191.1

8,884.3

11,206.7

1,012.1

2,276.2

7,918.4

U.S. market (ii)

-

1,406.6

1,305.1

 

503.5

801.6

Private placements (b)

288.8

320.2

299.1

 

142.6

156.5

Three Valleys bond issue (c)

267.6

206.1

221.2

 

 

221.2

Stirling Water Seafield Finance bond issue (d)

59.3

88.0

90.7

6.8

7.7

76.2

Other amounts < €50 million in 2009

202.8

192.4

141.7

26.3

21.7

93.7

Bonds

9,009.6

11,097.6

13,264.5

1,045.2

2,951.7

9,267.6


(a)

Publicly offered or traded issuances

i) European market: As of December 31, 2009, the amount in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position in respect of bonds issued under the European Medium Term Notes (EMTN) Program totaled €11,229.4 million, including €11,206.7 million maturing in more than one year. The impact of the fair value measurement of non-current bonds was €188.8 million.

Veolia Environnement issued notes under its EMTN program for a nominal amount of €2,250 million as of December 31, 2009. These issues break down as follows:

On April 22, 2009, Veolia Environnement performed the following bond issues:

-

€1,250 million bond issue bearing fixed-rate interest of 5.25% and maturing in 2014;

-

€750 million bond issue bearing fixed-rate interest of 6.75% and maturing in 2019;

On June 29, 2009, Veolia Environnement performed a €250 million bond issue bearing fixed-rate interest of 5.70% and maturing in 8 years in 2017.

The Series 9 bond issue (CZK 600 million) maturing on April 23, 2010 was transferred to current borrowings (€22.6 million euro equivalent).

(ii)

U.S. market: As of December 31, 2009, nominal outstandings on the bond issues performed in the United States on May 27, 2008 total €1,249.5 million (euro equivalent) and the amount in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position is €1,305.1 million (including fair value adjustments of €34.2 million). These fixed-rate bond issues total U.S.$1.8 billion and comprise three tranches:

-

Tranche 1, maturing June 3, 2013, of U.S.$700 million, bearing fixed-rate interest of 5.25%,

-

Tranche 2, maturing June 1, 2018, of U.S.$700 million, bearing fixed-rate interest of 6%,

-

Tranche 3, maturing June 1, 2038, of U.S.$400 million, bearing fixed-rate interest of 6.75%.

(b)

Private placements: As of December 31, 2009, the euro-equivalent amount in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position of private placements performed in the United States in 2003 (USPP) is €299.1 million (including fair value adjustments of €12.6 million). These bond issue comprise five tranches:

-

Tranches A, B and C, maturing January 30, 2013, of €33 million (fixed-rate interest of 5.84%), £7 million (fixed-rate interest of 6.22%) and U.S.$ 147 million (fixed-rate interest of 5.78%) respectively

-

Tranche D, maturing January 30, 2015, of U.S.$125 million, bearing fixed-rate interest of 6.02%

-

Tranche E, maturing January 30, 2018, of U.S.$85 million, bearing fixed-rate interest of 6.31%

(c)

Three Valleys bond issue: The €200 million bond issue performed by Three Valleys in the U.K. (Water Division) in July 2004, bearing interest of 5.875%, is recognized as of December 31, 2009 at amortized cost for a euro equivalent of €221.2 million. This bond matures on July 13, 2026.

(d)

Stirling Water Seafield Finance bond issue: The outstanding balance as of December 31, 2009 on the amortizable bond issue performed in 1999 by Stirling Water Seafield Finance (Veolia Water UK subsidiary, Water Division), is GBP 99.6 million. This bond issue is recognized at amortized cost for a euro equivalent of €90.7 million as of December 31, 2009 (non-current portion). Stirling Water was proportionately consolidated in the amount of 49% in 2007 and has been fully consolidated since December 2008 following the buy-out of non-controlling interests. This bond matures on September 26, 2026.




F-65


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

As of December 31, 2006

Maturity

 

2 years

3 to

5 years

After five years

Veolia Environnement SA:

      

Publicly offered or traded issuances(a)

5,538.7

6,939.0

7,588.6

1,010.9

66.1

6,511.6

Private placements (b)

309.5

344.0

309.1

-

-

309.1

Subordinated securities (c)

298.0

-

-

-

-

-

Water:

      

Three Valleys bond issue (d)

280.6

286.0

292.1

-

-

292.1

Waste Management:

      

Montgomery bond issue (e)

71.8

74.8

59.5

8.3

25.5

25.7

Tyseley bond issue (f)

66.0

62.5

57.8

7.3

25.1

25.4

Other < €50 million

187.5

151.6

110.4

32.8

12.0

65.6

Bonds

6,752.1

7,857.9

8,417.5

1,059.3

128.7

7,229.5


Back to Contents


(a)Breakdown of non-current bond issues by component:

Operation

(€ million)

Final maturity

Currency

Nominal

Interest rate

Net carrying amount

Series 7

02/01/2012

EUR

1,000

5.88%

1,012

Series 10

05/28/2013

EUR

1,000

4.88%

1,025

Series 10 bis

05/28/2018

EUR

750

5.38%

788

Series 12

11/25/2033

EUR

700

6.13%

695

Series 14

06/30/2015

USD

35

4.69%

36

Series 15

06/17/2015

EUR

875

1.75%

(indexed to European inflation)

920

Series 17

02/12/2016

EUR

900

4.00%

922

Series 18

12/11/2020

EUR

600

4.38%

632

Series 21

01/16/2017

EUR

1,140

4.38%

1,177

Series 23

05/24/2022

EUR

1,000

5.13%

1,038

Series 24

10/29/2037

GBP

732

6.13%

713

Series 27

06/29/2017

EUR

250

5.70%

250

Series 25

04/24/2014

EUR

1,250

5.25%

1,250

Series 26

04/24/2019

EUR

750

6.750%

749

Total bond issues (EMTN)

n/a

n/a

10,982

n/a

11,207

USD Series Tranche 1

06/03/2013

USD

486

5.25%

504

USD Series Tranche 2

06/01/2018

USD

485

6%

496

USD Series Tranche 3

06/01/2038

USD

278

6.75%

305

Total publicly offered or traded issuances in USD

n/a

n/a

1,249

 

1,305

USPP EUR 2013

01/30/2013

EUR

33

5.84%

32

USPP GBP 2013

01/30/2013

GBP

8

6.22%

8

USPP USD 2013

01/30/2013

USD

102

5.78%

102

USPP USD 2015

01/30/2015

USD

87

6.02%

92

USPP USD 2018

01/30/2018

USD

59

6.31%

65

Total U.S. private placements

n/a

n/a

289

n/a

299

Three Valleys bond issue

07/13/2026

GBP

225

5.88%

221

Stirling Water Seafield Finance bond issue

09/26/2026

GBP

100

5.82%

91

Total principal bond issues

n/a

n/a

12,250

n/a

13,123


AsRecap: Movements in bond issues during 2008 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December 31,
2007

Increases /
subscriptions

Repayments

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Fair value
adjustments(1)

Foreign
exchange
translation

Non-current /
current
reclassification

Other

As of
December 31,
2008

Non-current bonds

9,009.6

1,807.6

(37.7)

47.0

442.8

(121.6)

(68.8)

18.7

11,097.6

Current bonds

1,253.8

 

(1,261.3)

6.2

(0.5)

0.7

68.8

 

67.7

Total bonds

10,263.4

1,807.6

(1,299.0)

53.2

442.3

(120.9)

0.0

18.7

11,165.3


(1) Fair value adjustments are recorded in financial income and expenses.


17.2

Movements in other borrowings

(€ million)

As of
December
31,2008

Increases /
subscriptions

Repayments

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Fair value
adjustments(1)

Foreign
exchange
translation

Non-current /
current
reclassification

Other

As of
December
31, 2009

Other non-current borrowings

5,966.3

1,102.6

(1,514.8)

(127.7)

6.2

7.5

(1,042.5)

(14.8)

4,382.8

Other current borrowings

3,152.0

 

(1,179.4)

(8.1)

13.1

(41.8)

1,042.5

(32.1)

2,946.2

Total other borrowings

9,118.3

1,102.6

(2,694.2)

(135.8)

19.3

(34.3)

0.0

(46.9)

7,329.0


Changes in consolidation scope mainly concern the acquisition of December 31, 2006, bonds issued under the European Medium Term Notes (EMTN) Program totaled €8,221.7 million, including €7,588.6 million maturing in more than one year. The impact of the fair value measurement of long-term borrowings was €-42.4 million.

During 2006, Veolia Environnement issued notes under its EMTN program for a euro equivalent of €1,450.0 million (recognizedDigismart in the balance sheet at amortized cost of €1,430.4 million), which break down as follows:

-

€1 billion at a fixed-rate of 4.375%, maturing January 16, 2017. The amortized cost of the issue as of December 31, 2006 is €988.4 million.

-

 €300 million at floating rates (3-month Euribor+0.06%), maturing February 15, 2008. The amortized cost of the issue as of December 31, 2006 is €300.0 million.

-

 €150 million at floating rates (3-month Euribor), maturing July 18, 2007. The issue was partially redeemed in 2006Energy Services Division in the amount of €8 million. The amortized cost€45.9 million and the change in consolidation method (from full to proportionate consolidation) of the issue as of December 31, 2006 is €142.0 million.  Given its maturity, this bond issue is recordedWater Division in short-term borrowings.

In addition, Veolia Environnement performed a partial repurchase ofNorth Africa and the 2005 bond issue, maturing May 30, 2007,Middle East, in the amount of €9 million (in two tranches-€198.9 million.

Increases and repayments of €4.5 million). Given its maturity, this bond issue isother non-current borrowings mainly concern management transactions involving the multi-currency syndicated loans.



F-66



Back to Contents


Breakdown of othernon-current borrowings by main component:

(€ million)

As of December 31,2007

As of December 31,2008

As of December 31, 2009

Maturity

2 to 3 years

4 to 5 years

> 5 years

BWB and SPE debts(a)

1,234.8

1,392.4

1,344.7

213.2

307.7

823.8

Finance leases obligations(b)

754.5

751.2

650.4

253.5

137.4

259.5

Multi-currency syndicated loan facility(c)

-

1,109.7

305.4

305.4

 

 

Delfluent(d)

118.3

107.6

108.4

9.9

8.7

89.8

Shenzhen(e)

93.2

105.3

99.1

5.7

9.6

83.8

Non-controlling interest put options
(Note 1.15.5)(f)

309.9

183.6

95.2

84.4

0.8

10.0

VSA Tecnitalia(g)

164.6

100.4

94.5

35.1

27.4

32.0

Redal(h)

161.3

165.7

92.7

17.3

19.9

55.5

Cogevolt(i)

259.7

170.6

91.0

91.0

0.0

0.0

Syndicated loan facility in CZK(j)

338.0

316.3

75.4

75.4

 

 

Aquiris(k)

184.2

175.4

0.0

 

 

 

Other < €100 million

1,319.9

1,388.1

1,426.0

420.2

268.2

737.6

Other non-current borrowings

4,938.4

5,966.3

4,382.8

1,511.1

779.7

2,092.0


(a)  BWB and SPE debts: The Berliner Wasser Betriebe (“BWB” in Water Division) non-current borrowing, proportionately consolidated in the amount of 50%, breaks down as follows:

The debt borne by the operating companies of €1,088.6 million as of December 31, 2009, compared to €1,113.1 million as of December 31, 2008 and €933.3 million as of December 31, 2007.

Special purpose entity (SPE) debts of €256.1 million as of December 31, 2009, compared to €279.3 million as of December 31, 2008 and €301.5 million as of December 31, 2007.

(b)  Finance lease obligations: As of December 2009, finance lease obligations fall due between 2010 and 2031. Interest rates are fixed or floating (indexed to EONIA, euro T4M and euro TAM or their equivalent for financing in other currencies).

(c)  Multi-currency syndicated loan facility: This €4 billion multi-currency syndicated loan facility matures in 2012. Two draw-downs were performed in October 2008, in Polish zlotys and euros. As of December 31, 2009, this syndicated loan facility was drawn in the amount of €305.4 million (€73.9 million and PLN 950.1 million, or a euro equivalent of €231.5 million as of December 31, 2009).

(d)  Delfluent: Two floating-rate financing lines carried by Delfluent BV (Water Division), proportionately consolidated in the amount of 40%, in respect of the Hague wastewater treatment plant construction project. As of December 31, 2009 these two redeemable lines, maturing in 2030, had been drawn in the total amount of €108.4 million.

(e)  Shenzhen: This financing which concerns the comprehensive water management contract for the town of Shenzhen is carried by Beijing Capital VW Invest. Co and is proportionately consolidated (50%) in the amount of €99.1 million (euro equivalent) as of December 31, 2009. This Chinese renminbi yuan redeemable loan matures in June 2022 and bears interest to November 22, 2010, at a fixed-rate of 6.93% (revisable every six years).

(f)  The decrease in non-controlling interest put obligations primarily reflects the adjustment to the exercise price of the put option on VSA Tecnitalia.

(g)  VSA Tecnitalia: Primarily two floating-rate redeemable financing lines in the amount of €94.5 million, carried by VSA Tecnitalia (purchased in 2007, Environmental Services Division) to finance waste thermal treatment plant projects in Italy.

(h)  Redal: This non-recourse debt carried by Redal, Morocco (Water Division), was fully consolidated in 2008 and is now proportionately consolidated in the amount of 52%. It matures on December 31, 2018 and amounts to €92.7 million as of December 31, 2009.

(i)  Cogevolt: This securitization of future receivables was organized to finance cogeneration installations in the Energy Services Division. The debt reflects payments due in respect of the amortization of future receivables over the period to May 2012. The average fixed rate of interest payable on this debt is 5.20%.

(j)  Syndicated loan facility in CZK: This CZK 12 billion syndicated loan facility arranged by Komerčni Banka, Crédit Lyonnais and ING Bank in favor of Veolia Environnement, refinanced in 2005 the five-year CZK 8 billion syndicated loan facility negotiated in November 2003. It includes a CZK 8 billion tranche maturing July 29, 2010 and a CZK 4 billion redeemable tranche maturing July 27, 2012. As of December 31, 2009, this syndicated loan facility had been drawn down by CZK 8 billion (€302.1 million euro equivalent), including CZK 6 billion (€226.7 euro equivalent) maturing on July 29, 2009 and reclassified in current borrowings.

(k)  Aquiris: This financing carried by Aquiris in respect of the North Brussels wastewater treatment plant construction project (Water Division), was secured in December 2006. It comprises two credit lines bearing floating-rate interest. Veolia Eau- Compagnie Générale des Eaux granted a first-demand guarantee to the lenders of the Aquiris borrowings enabling Calyon and the EIB to obtain repayment of this borrowing on June 30, 2010 at the earliest. The Aquiris borrowing of €175.4 million is therefore reclassified in current borrowings as of December 31, 2009.




F-67



Back to Contents


Current borrowings are recorded in short-term borrowings.

(b)

As of December 31, 2006, €309.1 million (including -€4.5 million related to remeasurements) remained outstanding on the private placement performed in the United States in 2003 (USPP). This bond issue comprises five tranches:

-

Tranches A, B and C, maturing January 30, 2013, of €33 million (fixed-rate interest of 5.84%), £7 million (fixed-rate interest of 6.22%) and US$147 million (fixed-rate interest of 5.78%) respectively

-

Tranche D, maturing January 30, 2015, of US$125 million, bearing fixed-rate interest of 6.02%

-

Tranche E, maturing January 30, 2018, of US$85 million, bearing fixed-rate interest of 6.31%

The covenants triggering redemption in the event of default are:  ICR (Interest Coverage Rate) > 3.2 and DPR (Debt Payout Rate) < 5.3.

These ratios were defined based on IFRS accounts prior to application of IFRIC 12  and will be updated to take account of IFRIC 12. As of December 31, 2006, Veolia Environnement has not defaulted on these covenants.

(c)

Subordinated loan notes redeemable in preference shares (TSAR) issued on December 28, 2001 by the subsidiary VEFO and maturing December 28, 2006 in the amount of €300 million were repurchased on March 31, 2005.

(d)

The €200 million bond issue performed by the Water Division U.K. subsidiary, Three Valleys, in July 2004 bearing interest of 5.875%, is recognized as of December 31, 2006financial liabilities at amortized cost for a euro equivalent of €292.1 million. This bond matures on July 13, 2026.accounting purposes.

(e)

The U.S. Dollar bond issue, bearing interest of 5.0%, was performed to finance the Montgomery plant near Philadelphia (Pennsylvania) in the United States. This redeemable loan was recognized as of December 31, 2006 at amortized cost for a euro equivalent of €59.5 million, and the final repayment is due on November 1st, 2014.




Back to contents



(f)

This pound sterling bond issue, bearing interest of 6.6675%, was performed to refinance the incineration plant in Birmingham (UK). This redeemable loan was recognized as of December 31, 2006 at amortized cost for a euro equivalent of €57.8 million, and the final repayment is due on January 30, 2018.


Break down of bond issues by main component:


Operation



(€ millions)

Final maturity

Currency

Nominal
in € million

Interest rate

Amortized cost restatement*

Remeasure-ment

Net carrying amount

Effective interest rate before
hedging

Effective interest rate after hedging

Series 1

06/27/2008

EUR

700

5.88%

4

7

711

5.51 %

4.46%

Series 7

02/01/2012

EUR

1,000

5.88%

(6)

(24)

970

6.02%

6.22%

Series 8

04/29/2009

CSK

24

Pribor 3M + 0.67%

-

-

24

3%

3%

Series 9

04/23/2010

CSK

21

Pribor 3M + 0.67%

-

-

22

3.47 %

3.47%

Series 10

05/28/2013

EUR

1,000

4.88%

(7)

(10)

983

5.00%

4.71%

Series 10 a

05/28/2018

EUR

750

5.38%

2

6

758

5.35%

4.89%

Series 12

11/25/2033

EUR

700

6.13%

(6)

-

694

6.19%

6.19%

Series 13

03/04/2009

USD

21

Libor USD 3M + 0.55%

-

-

20

4.8%

4.8%

Series 14

06/30/2015

USD

38

4.69%

(1)

(2)

35

4.99%

5.83%

Series 15

06/17/2015

EUR

600

1.75%

16

-

616

3.49%

3.49%

Series 17

02/12/2016

EUR

900

4.00%

(6)

(13)

881

4.09%

4.12%

Series 18

12/11/2020

EUR

600

4.38%

(8)

(7)

585

4.50%

4.50%

Series 20

02/15/2008

EUR

300

Euribor 3M

+0.06%

-

-

300

3.43%

3.23%

Series 21

01/16/2017

EUR

1,000

4.38%

(12)

-

988

4.52%

4.52%

Total publicly offered issuances

  

7,654

 

(24)

(42)

7,589

n/a

n/a

USPP EUR 2013

01/30/2013

EUR

33

5.84%

-

-

33

5.89%

5.89%

USPP GBP 2013

01/30/2013

GBP

10

6.22%

-

-

10

6.27%

6.27%

USPP USD 2013

01/30/2013

USD

112

5.78%

(0.3)

(3)

109

5.83%

6.47%

USPP USD 2015

01/30/2015

USD

95

6.02%

(0.3)

(1)

93

6.06%

6.43%

USPP USD 2018

01/30/2018

USD

64

6.31%

(0.2)

(0.4)

64

6.35%

6.52%

Total private placements

  

314

 

(0.8)

(4)

309

n/a

n/a

Three Valleys bond issue

07/13/2026

GBP

298

5.88%

(6)

-

292

6.05%

6.05%

Montgomery bond issue

01/11/2014

USD

59

5.00%

-

-

59

3.40%

3.40%

Tyseley bond issue

07/30/2018

GBP

71

6.68%

(13)

-

58

9.50%

9.50%

MBM Chicago Biosolids bond issue

11/01/2023

USD

37

5.93%

-

-

37

5.93%

5.93%

Selchp bond issue (49%)

12/31/2021

GBP

34

7.14%

(1)

-

33

7.39%

7.39%

Total bond issues

  

8,468

 

(44)

(47)

8,377

n/a

n/a

* including long-term interest




Back to contents



Break down of other long-termCurrent borrowings by main component:


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

As of December 31, 2006

Maturity

 

2 years

3 to

5 years

After five years

BWB and SPE debts (a)

1,704.7

2,126.0

2,067.1

919.9

387.5

759.7

Finance leases obligations (b)

892.6

802.0

866.1

186.0

298.8

381.3

Syndicated credit in CZK (c)

262.6

344.8

363.8

-

218.3

145.5

Cogevolt (d)

561.5

457.0

358.8

148.3

203.5

7.0

Aquiris (e)

-

-

164.2

6.9

20.5

136.8

Put options (note 1.14)

113.9

177.7

276.0

43.5

112.7

119.8

Delfluent (f)

55.1

74.4

102.3

-

28.6

73.7

Local authority borrowing annuities (g)

112.7

120.3

101.1

19.9

54.4

26.8

Shenzhen (h)

88.9

105.3

97.5

-

-

97.5

Securitization (i)

334.2

333.7

-

-

-

-

Other < €100 million

1,278.7

1,323.7

1,187.2

298.4

329.5

559.3

Other long-term borrowings

5,404.9

5,864.9

5,584.1

1,622.9

1,653.8

2,307.4


(a)

The Berliner Wasser Betriebe ("BWB") debt consists of:

-

The debt borne by the operating companies of €1,148.7 total €2,983.1 million as of December 31, 20062009, compared to €1,192.0€3,219.7 million as of December 31, 2005;

-

Acquisition debt of €6002008 and €3,805.0 million as of December 31, 2006. The Berlin contract acquisition debt borne2007.

This decrease is mainly due to:

a €602 million decrease in treasury note outstandings;

the repayment of the U.S.$27 million EMTN Series 13 bond issue (€22.2 million euro equivalent at historical rates), which matured March 4, 2009.

the repayment of the CZK660 million EMTN Series 8 bond issue (€22.1 million euro equivalent at historical rates), which matured April 29, 2009.

the repayment of a floating-rate financing line carried by RWE/Veolia Berliner Wasser Beteiligungs AG (“RVB”) of €600 million, maturing January 15, 2005, was refinancedDelfluent BV (Water Division), proportionately consolidated in the same amount of 40%, in respect of the Hague wastewater treatment plant construction project, for three years, maturing January 15, 2008.an amount of €17.5 million;

Special purpose entity (SPE) debts total €318.4 million as

partially offset by the reclassification in current borrowings of:

-

one tranche of December 31, 2006, compared to €334.0 million as of December 31, 2005.

(b)

As of December 31, 2006, finance lease obligations fall due between 2007 and 2031. Depending on the currency, fixed interest rates are between 2.90% and 12.09% and floating interest rates are indexed to EONIA, euro T4M (average monthly yield on the money market) and euro TAM (annualized money market rate) or their equivalent for financing in other currencies.

(c)

This CZK 12 billion syndicated creditloan facility arranged by Komerčni Banka, Crédit Lyonnais, and ING Bank in favor of Veolia Environnement, refinancesmaturing July 29, 2010, in the five-year CZK 8 billion syndicated credit facility negotiated in November 2003. It includes a five-year trancheamount of CZK 86 billion (maturing July 29, 2010) and a seven-year tranche of CZK 4 billion (maturing July 27, 2012). As of December 31, 2006, this syndicated credit facility had been drawn down CZK 10 billion (€363.8226.6 million euro equivalent).

(d)-

This securitization of future receivables was organized to finance cogeneration installations in the Energy Services Division. The debt reflects payments due in respect of the amortization of future receivables over the period to May 2012. The average fixed rate of interest payable on this debt is 5.42%.

(e)

This financingborrowings carried by Aquiris in respectthe amount of €175.4 million (see point (k) of the North Brussels wastewater treatment plant construction project, was securedbreakdown of non-current borrowings),

-

the EMTN Series 9 bond issue maturing on April 23, 2010, reclassified in December 2006. It comprises two credit lines bearing floating-rate interest. As of December 31, 2006, the lines had been drawncurrent borrowings in the amount of €164.2 million.

(f)

Three floating-rate financing lines carried by Delfluent BV in respect of the Hague wastewater treatment plant construction project. One of these lines is repayable in full on maturity in 2009, while the other two lines, maturing 2030, are redeemable loans. As of December 31, 2006, the lines had been drawn in the amount of €102.3 million.

(g)

The Group assumes certain fee obligations to local authorities under public service contracts. Local authority borrowing annuities as of December 31, 2006 total €101.1 million.

(h)

This financing which concerns the comprehensive water management contract for the town of Shenzhen is carried by Beijing Capital VW Invest.Co and is consolidated (50%) as of December 31, 2006 in theCZK 600 million (€22.6 million euro equivalent of €97.5 million. This Chinese yuan redeemable loan matures in June 2022 and bears interest to November 22, 2010 at a fixed-rate of 6.93% (revisable every six years)equivalent).

(i)

 The Acqueduc securitized debt fund was transferred to short-term borrowings as it matures in June 2007.





Back to contents



Long-term borrowings break down by original currency (before swap transactions) as follows (amortized cost or fair value):


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

As of December 31, 2006

Euro

9,922.8

11,103.5

11,542.0

U.S. Dollar

480.6

655.2

558.2

Pound Sterling

527.8

515.8

554.0

Czech Crown

370.3

446.8

447.1

Chinese Yuan

103.7

139.9

183.8

Korean Won

130.9

122.4

60.8

Polish Zloty

23.3

62.5

64.7

Norwegian Crown

55.8

41.7

37.9

Australian Dollar

97.7

137.8

17.4

Other

444.1

497.2

535.7

Long-term borrowings

12,157.0

13,722.8

14,001.6

The €438 million increase in euro-denominated borrowings is mainly due to two bond issues of €1,000 million and €300 million respectively by Veolia Environnement SA.

This increase is partially offset by the transfer to short-term borrowings of floating rate EMTN bonds (3-month Euribor +0.07%), maturing May 30, 2007, in the amount of €500 million and the Acqueduc securitization program in the amount of €334 million.

The €120 million decrease in Australian dollar-denominated long-term borrowings is due to the repayment of Australian discounted receivables in the Waste Management Division.


Undrawn credit lines

The main undrawn credit lines as of December 31, 2006 were as follows:

·

undrawn “multi-purpose” short-term credit lines of €150 million,

·

undrawn “multi-purpose” medium-term credit lines of €925 million,

·

medium-term syndicated loan of €4,000 million maturing April 20, 2012,


Reminder: Movements in long-term borrowings during 2005:


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Increases / subscriptions

Repayments

Changes in consolidation scope

Fair value adjustments

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

Bonds

6,752.1

2,633.4

(1,506.7)

-

(119.4)

124.8

(26.3)

7,857.9

Other long-term borrowings

5,404.9

553.2

(771.3)

92.5

(0.7)

106.6

479.7

5,864.9

Long-term borrowings

12,157.0

3,186.6

(2,278.0)

92.5

(120.1)

231.4

453.4

13,722.8


Reminder: Movements in long-term borrowings during 2004


(€ millions)

As of January 1,2004 adjusted

Increases / subscriptions

Repayments

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation and fair value adjustments

Other

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Bonds

8,501.7

315.5

(2,321.3)

(3.1)

161.9

97.4

6,752.1

Other long-term borrowings

5,988.5

582.9

(1,095.6)

87.9

(67.3)

(91.5)

5,404.9

Long-term borrowings

14,490.2

898.4

(3,416.9)

84.8

94.6

5.9

12,157.0






Back to contents



Note 20

Other non-current liabilities

Movements in other non-current liabilities during2006:


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

Additions

Repayments / disposals

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,
2006

Other non-current liabilities

203.7

21.2

(14.2)

1.6

(3.4)

(1.6)

207.3

No amounts were transferred to Non-current liabilities held for sale in 2006, 2005 or 2004.


The main other non-current liabilities as of December 31, 2006 include:

·

Discounted guarantee deposits paid by subscribers of €41.7 million (Water Division France);

·

Back tax payable of €20.7 million (Water Division UK);

·

Dade deferred income of €10.5 million (Waste Management Division).



Reminder: Movements in other non-current liabilities during 2005:


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Additions

Repayments / disposals

Changes in consolidation scope

Fair value adjustments

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

Other non-current liabilities

159.7

18.2

(40.9)

6.9

(3.2)

15.9

47.1

203.7



Reminder: Movements in other non-current liabilities during 2004


(€ millions)

As of January 1,2004 adjusted

Additions

Repayments / disposals

Changes in consolidation scope

Fair value adjustments

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Other non-current liabilities

163.9

32.6

(51.8)

(22.3)

-

(14.8)

52.1

159.7



Note 21

Short-term borrowings

Movements in short-term borrowings during2006 (amortized cost or fair value):


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2006

Short-term borrowings

2,138.2

(239.2)

89.8

(7.6)

922.9

2,904.1

Amounts transferred to Non-current liabilities held for sale  totaled €6.8 million in 2006 compared to nil in 2005.

Short-term borrowings total €2,904.1 million as of December 31, 2006, compared to €2,138.2 million as of December 31, 2005. This increase is mainly due to:

·

the transfer of EMTN Series 16 bonds, maturing May 2007, with a euro-equivalent of €491 million, from long-term borrowings to short-term borrowings;

·

the transfer of the securitization program set-up by the Water Division, maturing June 2007, with a euro-equivalent of €313 million, from long-term borrowings to short-term borrowings;

·

the issue of EMTN Series 19 bonds in the amount of €142 million, maturing July 2007;

·

the entry of SNCM into the scope of consolidation (€43 million);

·

a decrease of €300 million in Veolia Environnement SA treasury notes.

As of December 31, 2006, short-term2009, current borrowings mainly concern:

·

Veolia Environnement SA for €1,878€1,343.4 million (including treasury notes of €733€302 million, bond issues maturing within one year of €633€22.7 million, securitization program debts of €313€409.2 million, the Czech crown syndicated loan facility of €226.6 million and accrued interest on bondsdebt of €195€344.2 million);

·

the Water Division for €433€767.8 million (including the company carrying the Berlin contract for €164€160.1 million and the Acquiris borrowing for €179.1 million);

·

the Environmental Services Division for €411.4 million;

the Energy Services Division for €234€367.1 million (including the short-termcurrent portion of Cogevolt financing of €98 million)€73.6 millions);

·

the Waste Management Division for €211 million;

·

the Transportation Division for €122 million (including SNCM for €43 million);€52.1 million;

Short-term borrowingsCurrent debts in respect of Group finance leases totaled €131.3total €117.4 million as of December 31, 2006 (see Note 38).2009, compared to €141.9 million as of December 31, 2008 and €125.6 million as of December 31, 2007.

Recap: Movements in other borrowings during 2008 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December 31,
2007

Increases /
subscrip-tions

Repay-
ments

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Fair value
adjustments

Foreign
exchange
translation

Non-current /
current
reclassification

Other

As of
December
31, 2008

Other non-current borrowings

4,938.4

1,918.0

(147.1)

58.4

10.0

(83.2)

(711.7)

(16.5)

5,966.3

Other current borrowings

2,551.2

 

(174.2)

143.7

(266.6)

119.8

711.7

66.4

3,152.0

Total other borrowings

7,489.6

1,918.0

(321.3)

202.1

(256.6)

36.6

0.0

49.9

9,118.3




F-68



Back to contentsContents




17.3

Reminder: MovementsBreakdown of non-current and current borrowings by currency

Borrowings are primarily denominated in short-term borrowings during 2005 (amortized cost or fair value):euro, pound sterling, U.S. dollar, Czech crown, Chinese renminbi yuan and Polish zloty.


Borrowings break down by original currency (before currency swaps) as follows:

(€ millions)

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

Short-term borrowings

5,426.1

(2,936.2)

20.8

37.3

(409.8)

2,138.2



Reminder: Movements in short-term borrowings during 2004(amortized cost or fair value):


(€ millions)

As of January 1,2004 adjusted

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Short-term borrowings

3,637.0

1,789.2

7.3

(35.7)

28.3

5,426.1


(€ million)

As of December 31,2008

As of December 31, 2009

Euro

14,662.5

15,444.3

U.S. dollar

2,128.6

1,902.9

Pound sterling

1,254.9

1,282.7

Czech crown

411.3

365.2

Chinese renminbi yuan

476.4

496.7

Polish zloty

318.7

311.2

Moroccan dirham

287.7

166.4

Korean won

39.3

38.4

Norwegian crown

24.0

21.3

Israeli shekel

129.3

109.1

Danish krone

208.3

146.5

Other

342.6

345.7

Non-current and current borrowings

20,283.6

20,630.4


Note 2217.4

Bank overdraftsFinance leases

The Group uses finance leases to finance the purchase of certain operating property, plant and other cash position items

Movementsequipment and real estate assets recorded in bank overdrafts and other cash position items during2006:


assets in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

(€ millions)

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2006

Water

222.9

(96.9)

8.6

(1.3)

2.0

135.3

Waste Management

87.4

10.4

7.1

(1.9)

(6.1)

96.9

Energy Services

161.6

(21.7)

27.6

0.2

6.8

174.5

Transportation

32.4

(9.0)

4.4

(0.2)

(1.4)

26.2

Other

2.5

20.4

0.2

-

-

23.1

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

506.8

(96.8)

47.9

(3.2)

1.3

456.0

Amounts transferredAssets financed by finance leases break down by category as follows:

(€ million)

Property, plant and
equipment, net

Concession intangible
assets

Operating financial
assets

Total

December 31, 2009

381.2

146.2

267.6

795.0

December 31, 2008

455.1

173.8

271.0

899.9

December 31, 2007

423.5

191.7

284.8

900.0


As of December 31, 2009, future minimum lease payments under these contracts break down as follows:

(€ million)

Finance leases
(in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position )

Less than 1 year

169.8

2 to 3 years

289.3

4 to 5 years

174.0

More than 5 years

358.3

Total future minimum lease payments

991.4

Less amounts representing interest

228.6

Present value of minimum lease payments (finance leases)

762.8


Contingent rent and sub-lease income for the period recorded in the Consolidated Income Statement is not material.



F-69



Back to Non-current liabilities held for sale totaled €1.3 million in 2006 compared to nil in 2005.Contents



NOTE 18

Reminder: MovementsRevenue

Pursuant to IFRS 5,Non-Current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations, the results of operations of:

Clemessy and Crystal entities, in bank overdraftsthe Energy Services Division, sold in December 2008,

waste-to-energy activity entities in the United States (Montenay International) in the Environmental Services Division and other cash position itemsFreight activity entities (primarily in France, Germany and the Netherlands) in the Transportation Division, sold during 2005:the second half of 2009 and,


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

Water

143.9

55.0

(0.2)

2.6

21.6

222.9

Waste Management

78.1

(26.0)

39.6

3.9

(8.2)

87.4

Energy Services

167.2

(7.3)

12.0

(0.8)

(9.5)

161.6

Transportation

20.0

11.8

(6.2)

1.1

5.7

32.4

Other

10.9

12.3

3.0

0.3

(24.0)

2.5

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

420.1

45.8

48.2

7.1

(14.4)

506.8



activities in the United Kingdom in the Transportation Division and renewable energy activities in the process of being sold,




Back to contents



Reminder: Movementswere grouped together in bank overdraftsa single line, “Net income from discontinued operations”, for fiscal year 2009 and other cash position items during 2004:


(€ millions)

As of January 1,2004 adjusted

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Water

233.4

(94.7)

3.5

(0.3)

2.0

143.9

Waste Management

94.9

(14.1)

1.8

(1.1)

(3.4)

78.1

Energy Services

191.4

(54.5)

31.6

(0.2)

(1.1)

167.2

Transportation

36.3

(16.5)

0.2

-

-

20.0

Other

1.5

9.4

-

-

-

10.9

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

557.5

(170.4)

37.1

(1.6)

(2.5)

420.1



Note 23

Revenuefiscal years 2008 and 2007 presented for comparison purposes.

Breakdown of revenue (see note 1.17)1.18)


(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31,2005 adjusted

Services rendered

24,441.3

21,826.4

Sales of goods

1,609.1

1,387.9

Revenue from operating financial assets

351.0

   325.8

IFRIC 12 construction contract operating financial assets

284.9

379.0

IFRIC 12 construction contract intangible assets

243.0

255.5

IFRIC 4 construction contracts

57.6

48.6

IAS 11 construction contracts

1,633.5

1,347.2

Revenue

28,620.4

25,570.4

(€ million)

Year ended
December 31,
2009

Year ended
December 31,
2008

Year ended
December 31,
2007

Services rendered

27,998.2

29,033.4

26,284.1

Sales of goods

1,756.5

1,711.9

1,435.4

Revenue from operating financial assets

394.4

398.0

342.1

Construction

4,401.9

4,621.5

3,512.5

Revenue

34,551.0

35,764.8

31,574.1


Sales of goods mainly concern construction business related to supply and wastewater treatment managementsales of technological solutions in the Water Division and sales of products relatedrelating to recycling activities in the Waste ManagementEnvironmental Services Division.


Note 24

F-70



Back to Contents



NOTE 19

Operating income

Operating income is calculated as follows:


(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31,2005 adjusted

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Revenue

28,620.4

25,570.4

22,792.4

Cost of sales

(23,427.1)

(20,869.9)

(18,604.8)

o/w:

Impairment losses on intangible assets with an indefinite useful life and badwill

10.7

(7.2)

(71.9)

Restructuring costs

(25.1)

(16.2)

(46.8)

Selling costs

(515.2)

(478.5)

(439.7)

General and administrative expenses

(2,611.2)

(2,394.9)

(2,227.0)

o/w:

Research and development costs

(66.4)

(62.9)

(62.6)

Other operating revenue and expenses

66.0

65.8

(31.3)

o/w:

Capital gains and losses on disposal

50.9

57.9

(102.1)

Other

15.1

7.9

70.8

Operating income

2,132.9

1,892.9

1,489.6





Back to contents




(€ millions)

Charges  

Reversals

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31,2005 adjusted

Operating depreciation, amortization and additions to provisions

(2,166.2)

756.4

(1,409.8)

(1,292.5)

Depreciation and amortization

(1,357.4)

0.6

(1,356.8)

(1,253.3)

Property, plant and equipment

(1,046.4)

0.6

(1,045.8)

(949.3)

Intangible assets

(311.0)

-

(311.0)

(304.0)

Impairment losses

(208.6)

148.9

(59.7)

(40.2)

Property, plant and equipment

(26.2)

10.0

(16.2)

(7.8)

Intangible assets

(7.8)

-

(7.8)

(4.7)

Inventories

(13.4)

11.0

(2.4)

(1.9)

Trade accounts receivable

(152.7)

113.8

(38.9)

(10.4)

Other operating and non-operating receivables

(8.5)

14.1

5.6

(15.4)

Non-current and current operating provisions other than replacement provisions

(600.2)

606.9

6.7

1.0

Non-current operating provisions other than replacement provisions

(287.1)

188.0

(99.1)

(43.0)

Current operating provisions

(313.1)

418.9

105.8

44.0

Replacement costs*

  

(368.1)

(351.1)

Impairment losses and disposal of intangible assets with an indefinite useful life and badwill

  

0.6

(28.0)

Operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses

  

(1,777.3)

(1,671.6)


*Replacement costs:all replacement costs for publicly-owned utility networks in the context of French “delegation de service public” are considered in the cash flow statement as investments, irrespective of whether the utility network was originally financed by the concession holder. As such, in the passage from net income (loss) to net cash from operating activities, all replacement costs are eliminated under adjustments for depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses.

(€ million)

Year ende
December 31,
2009

Year ended
December 31,
2008

Year ended
December 31,
2007

Revenue

34,551.0

35,764.8

31,574.1

Cost of sales(1)

(28,786.2)

(30,013.4)

(25,710.4)

o/w: Impairment losses on goodwill and negative goodwill recorded in the Consolidated Income Statement

(6.5)

(302.2)

18.2

Selling costs

(602.6)

(621.4)

(560.4)

General and administrative expenses(1)

(3,338.1)

(3,218.6)

(2,905.8)

o/w: Research and development costs

(89.8)

(92.1)

(84.6)

Other operating revenue and expenses

196.0

49.4

63.6

o/w: Capital gains and losses on disposal(2)

183.4

48.9

106.5

Other(2)

13.6

0.5

-

Operating income

2,020.1

1,960.8

2,461.2


(1)

In 2008, as part of ongoing efficiency measures, the Group reclassified certain expenses from cost of sales to selling costs and general and administrative expenses. These reclassifications had no impact on operating income. The impact of these reclassifications on Cost of sales, Selling costs and General and administrative expenses is €256.0 million, -€29.9 million and -€226.1 million respectively in 2007.

(2)

Primarily capital gains on disposals of financial assets; industrial and financial capital gains totaled €213.6 million in 2009 compared to €114.1 million in 2008 and €171.5 million in 2007; financial capital gains on assets classified as held for sale totaled €92.4 million in 2009 compared to €176.5 million in 2008 and €0.7 million in 2007.


Operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses included in operating income in2009break down as follows:

(€ million)

Charge

Reversal

Year ended December 31, 2009

Year ended December 31,2008

Year ended December 31,2007

Operating depreciation, amortization and provisions, net

(2,962.9)

1,071.9

(1,891.0)

(1,632.0)

(1,435.4)

Depreciation and amortization

(1,806.8)

16.7

(1,790.1)

(1,663.7)

(1,518.6)

Property, plant and equipment

(1,357.8)

16.7

(1,341.1)

(1,239.6)

(1,151.4)

Intangible assets

(449.0)

-

(449.0)

(424.1)

(367.2)

Impairment losses

(326.2)

168.2

(158.0)

(138.3)

(47.5)

Property, plant and equipment

(9.1)

3.2

(5.9)

(0.3)

(35.7)

Intangible assets

(77.8)

3.0

(74.8)

(70.1)

(0.7)

Inventories

(36.5)

42.6

6.1

(43.3)

(1.7)

Trade receivables

(175.4)

105.9

(69.5)

(30.4)

(39.2)

Other operating and non-operating
receivables

(27.4)

13.5

(13.9)

5.8

29.8

Non-current and current operating provisions other than replacement provisions

(829.9)

887.0

57.1

170.0

130.7

Non-current operating provisions other than
replacement provisions

(468.4)

453.8

(14.6)

50.3

51.6

Current operating provisions

(361.5)

433.2

71.7

119.7

79.1

Replacement costs*

 

 

(360.9)

(390.3)

(358.4)

Impairment losses and impact of disposals
on goodwill and negative goodwill presented
in the Consolidated Income Statement

  

(6.5)

(302.2)

18.2

Operating depreciation, amortization,
provisions and impairment losses

 

 

(2,258.4)

(2,324.5)

(1,775.6)


*

Replacement costs: all replacement costs for concession assets in the context of public service delegation contracts in France are considered in the Consolidated Cash Flow Statement as investments, irrespective of whether the infrastructure was originally financed by the concession holder. As such, in the passage from net income (loss) to net cash from operating activities, all replacement costs are eliminated under adjustments for operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses.




F-71



Back to Contents


Operating depreciation, amortization, charges to provisions and impairment losses in the cash flow statementConsolidated Cash Flow Statement include operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses in respect of Transportation Division Denmark operations transferred to Net income from discontinued operations in the amount of €53.7-€48.1 million in 2006.2009, -€27.6 million in 2008 and -€49.5 million in 2007.

Recap: Before adjustment for the sale of Montenay International in the Environmental Services Division, of Freight activities in the United Kingdom in the Transportation Division and of renewable energy activities, published Operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses for fiscal year 2008 broke down as follows:

(€ million)

Charge

Reversal

Year ended
December 31, 2008

Year ended
December 31,2007

Operating depreciation, amortization and provisions, net

(2,674.2)

1,014.7

(1,659.5)

(1,460.0)

Depreciation and amortization

(1,711.5)

22.2

(1,689.3)

(1,542.6)

Property, plant and equipment

(1,285.1)

22.2

(1,262.9)

(1,173.8)

Intangible assets

(426.4)

 

(426.4)

(368.8)

Impairment losses

(286.6)

146.0

(140.6)

(48.0)

Property, plant and equipment

(8.3)

8.0

(0.3)

(35.7)

Intangible assets

(74.3)

4.2

(70.1)

(0.7)

Inventories

(51.9)

8.6

(43.3)

(1.7)

Trade receivables

(144.1)

111.6

(32.5)

(39.7)

Other operating and non-operating receivables

(8.0)

13.6

5.6

29.8

Non-current and current operating provisions other than replacement provisions

(676.1)

846.5

170.4

130.6

Non-current operating provisions other than
replacement provisions

(379.0)

429.7

50.7

51.5

Current operating provisions

(297.1)

416.8

119.7

79.1

Replacement costs*

 

 

(390.3)

(358.4)

Impairment losses and impact of disposals on goodwill and negative goodwill presented in the Consolidated Income Statement

  

(319.9)

18.2

Operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses

  

(2,369.7)

(1,800.2)






Back to contents



Breakdown of impairment losses and the impact of disposals on goodwill


Impairment losses on goodwill break down as follows (see also Note 4)4, Goodwill):

(€ million)

Year ended
December 31,
2009

Year ended
December 31,
2008

Year ended
December 31,
2007

Impairment losses on goodwill of the Environmental Services Division Germany CGU

 

(343.0)

-

Impairment losses on goodwill of the Transportation Division “Other European” CGU

 

(37.6)

-

Impairment losses on goodwill of the Eurolines CGU

  

(6.9)

Negative goodwill recorded in the Consolidated Income Statement – Water Division

 

2.3

-

Negative goodwill recorded in the Consolidated Income Statement – SNCM

 

70.2

10.9

Negative goodwill recorded in the Consolidated Income Statement following employee share subscriptions – Lodz (Energy Services Division - Poland)

 

2.1

10.3

Other

(6.5)

3.8

3.9

Impairment losses on goodwill and negative goodwill presented in Cost of sales in the Consolidated Income Statement

(6.5)

(302.2)

18.2

Impairment losses and impact of disposals on goodwill presented in Other operating revenue and expenses in the Consolidated Income Statement

 

-

-

Impairment losses and impact of disposals on goodwill and negative goodwill presented in the Consolidated Income Statement

(6.5)

(302.2)

18.2



F-72


(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31,2005 adjusted

Year ended December 31,2004 adjusted

Impairment losses on goodwill of the Transportation Division Northern Europe CGU

-

-

(70.0)

Impairment losses on goodwill of the Waste Management Division Israel CGU

-

(10.0)

-

Impairment losses on goodwill of the Energy Services Division Stérience CGU

-

(4.7)

-

Negative goodwill through profit or loss – Water Division

11.2

5.2

-

Other

(0.5)

2.3

(1.9)

Impairment losses on goodwill presented in Cost of sales in the Income Statement and negative goodwill

10.7

(7.2)

(71.9)

Impact of the partial sale of the Energy Services Division Clemessy CGU following the sale of the Nuclear business

-

(14.0)

-

Impact of the partial sale of the Energy Services Division Germany CGU following the sale of the Facility Management business

-

(6.8)

-

Corrections to purchase price allocations in the Water Division Germany CGU

(2.8)

-

-

Impairment losses on goodwill of the Transportation Division Germany CGU

(7.3)

-

-

Impairment losses and impact of disposals on goodwill presented in Other operating revenue and expenses in the Income Statement

(10.1)

(20.8)

-

Impairment losses and impact of disposals on goodwill and negative goodwill

0.6

(28.0)

(71.9)



Restructuring costs


(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31,2005 adjusted

Year ended December 31,2004 adjusted

Restructuring expenses

(30.6)

(36.0)

(53.7)

Net charge to restructuring provisions

5.5

19.8

6.9

Restructuring costs

(25.1)

(16.2)

(46.8)


As of December 31, 2006, restructuring costs mainly concern the Energy Services Division (-€10.7 million), the Waste Management Division (-€6.5 million) and the Water Division (-€4.8 million).Back to Contents


PersonnelRestructuring costs


(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31,2005 adjusted

Year ended December 31,2004 adjusted

Employee costs

(8,893.0)

(8,047.8)

(7,283.1)

Profit sharing

(59.2)

(58.5)

(51.5)

Share-based compensation (IFRS 2)

(40.9)

(30.3)

(6.9)

Personnel costs

(8,993.1)

(8,136.6)

(7,341.5)

(€ million)

Year ended
December 31, 2009

Year ended
December 31,2008

Year ended
December 31,2007

Restructuring expenses

(39.6)

(34.5)

(29.6)

Net charge to restructuring provisions

16.8

5.5

0.6

Restructuring costs

(22.8)

(29.0)

(29.0)


Personnel costs

(€ million)

Year ended
December 31, 2009

Year ended
December 31,2008

Year ended
December 31,2007

Employee costs

(10,554.0)

(10,315.0)

(9,449.8)

Profit sharing and incentive schemes

(172.0)

(171.8)

(166.3)

Share-based compensation (IFRS 2)

(10.9)

(5.2)

(65.4)

Personnel costs

(10,736.9)

(10,492.0)

(9,681.5)


The IFRS 2 share-based compensation expense in respect of 2009 (€10.9 million) solely concerns share option and free share allocation plans granted in 2007 and prior years. In 2009, no new share purchase or subscription option plans were granted.

Research and development costs


Research and development costs totaled €66.4€89.8 million, €62.9€92.1 million and €62.6€84.6 million in 2006, 20052009, 2008 and 20042007 respectively.






Back to contents


NOTE 20


Note 25

Finance costs andNet finance incomecosts


The income and expense balances making up net finance costs are as follows:

(€ million)

Year ended
December 31, 2009

Year ended
December 31,2008

Year ended
December 31,2007

Finance income

96.1

202.2

151.1

Finance costs

(880.4)

(1,111.2)

(958.0)

Net finance costs

(784.3)

(909.0)

(806.9)


(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31,2005 adjusted

Year ended December 31,2004 adjusted

Finance income

82.8

63.3

91.8

Finance costs

(783.8)

(774.0)

(832.9)

Total

(701.0)

(710.7)

(741.1)

Finance costs and finance income represent the cost of borrowings net of cash and cash equivalents. In addition, net finance costs include net gains and losses on derivatives allocated to borrowings, irrespective of whether they qualify for hedge accounting.

They includeNet finance costs fell, despite an increase in average net debt from €16,142 million in 2008 to €16,466 million in 2009. This decrease is due to the fall in the financing rate (defined as net finance costs excluding fair value movements onadjustments to instruments not qualifying for hedge accounting, divided by average monthly net debt during the period) from 5.61% in 2008 to 4.76% in 2009. This fall of €6.4 millionnearly 1% is mainly due to:

the decrease in 2006, comparedshort-term rates on the floating portion of the debt (primarily Eonia, Euribor and GBP and USD libor);

partially offset by the cost of liquidity (cash received under the €2 billion bond issue on April 24, 2009 – including a €1.25 billion tranche maturing in 5 years and a €0.75 billion tranche maturing in 10 years – is invested in low-risk short-term instruments with a yield close to €10.1 million in  2005. These movements, which are calculated in accordance with IAS 39 and depend on market conditions at the year end, are highly volatile in nature.Eonia).



F-73



Back to Contents



Note 26

Other financial income and expenses


(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31,2005 adjusted

Year ended December 31,2004 adjusted

Loan income

29.9

37.0

55.4

Dividends

9.7

6.5

5.9

Foreign exchange gains (losses)

(14.3)

14.3

(13.9)

Financial provisions

(8.4)

24.2

-

Other income (expense)

(50.9)

(53.9)

(3.0)

Other financial income and expenses

(34.0)

28.1

44.4

(€ million)

Year ended
December 31, 2009

Year ended
December 31,2008

Year ended
December 31,2007

Financial liabilities measured using the effective interest method

(962.1)

(1,019.7)

(879.9)

Commission not included in the EIR

(4.6)

(3.1)

(4.2)

Expenses on gross debt

(966.7)

(1,022.8)

(884.1)

Assets at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement (fair value option)*

75.4

137.3

128.1

Net gains and losses on derivative instruments, hedging relationships and other

107.0

(23.5)

(50.9)

Net finance costs

(784.3)

(909.0)

(806.9)


* Cash equivalents are valued at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement.


Other financialNet gains and losses on derivative instruments, hedging relationships and other mainly include the following amounts for fiscal year 2009:

interest income on hedging relationships (fair value hedges and expenses fell from net incomecash flow hedges) of €28.1€149.1 million, in 2005 toas a net expenseresult of €34.0 million in 2006.


Thethe fall in other financial interest rates in fiscal year 2009;

income and expenses is due toon the reversalineffective portion of the foreign exchange position for -€28.6 million, the fair value remeasurementhedging relations of embedded derivatives for -€13.8 million and charges to provisions in 2006 for -€8.4 million, mainly related to guarantees issued by Waste Management Division subsidiaries in Asia.€6 million;


In 2006:

·

the unwinding of the discount for long-term provisionson non-controlling interest put options in the amount of -€11.9 million,

net gains and losses on “trading” derivatives of -€19.5 million, mainly on foreign currency derivatives.

In addition, the charge relating to the ineffective portion of net investment hedges and cash flow hedges was not material in 2009.

Interest income on instruments measured using the effective interest method (including interest income recorded in operating income and in other financial income and expenses) totaled €15.9 million, compared to €17.3€412.6 million in 2005;2009.

·NOTE 21

the Other financial income and expenses

(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2009

Year ended December 31,2008

Year ended December 31,2007

Net gains on loans and receivables(1)

13.9

43.3

55.6

Net gains and losses on available-for-sale assets(2)

8.0

9.3

10.3

Assets and liabilities at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement

(22.9)

35.1

5.4

Unwinding of the discount on provisions

(83.0)

(73.3)

(59.4)

Foreign exchange gains and losses

(10.7)

(42.8)

(2.2)

Other expenses

(15.6)

(10.8)

(7.4)

Other financial income and expenses

(110.3)

(39.2)

2.3


(1)

including impairment losses of -€11.8 million in 2009, compared to -€4.9 million in 2008 and -€7.1 million in 2007.

(2)

including dividends received of €8.7 million in 2009, compared to €8.4 million in 2008 and €8.8 million in 2007.

Other financial income and expenses decreased from a net expense of -€39.2 million in 2008, to a net expense of -€110.3 million in 2009.

This downturn is mainly due to:

a -€29.4 million decrease in net gains on loans and receivables;

fair value remeasurement of embedded derivatives in these contracts totaledadjustments for -€16.358 million, compared to
-including -€2.560 million in 2005.



respect of indexing clauses in Water Division contracts.



F-74



Back to contentsContents



Note 27NOTE 22

Income tax expense

Analysis of the Income Tax Expense


income tax expense

The income tax expense breaks down as follows:


(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31,2005 adjusted

Year ended December 31,2004 adjusted

(€ million)

Year ended
December 31, 2009

Year ended
December 31,2008

Year ended
December 31,2007

Current income tax expense

(330.9)

(309.4)

(225.1)

(303.4)

(375.9)

(407.1)

France

(75.1)

(95.1)

(93.9)

(79.7)

(90.1)

(108.8)

Other countries

(255.8)

(214.3)

(131.2)

(223.7)

(285.8)

(298.3)

Deferred income tax expense (credit)

(78.7)

(113.0)

50.2

61.2

(86.1)

7.4

France

(103.1)

(49.2)

138.1

9.8

(29.6)

(95.4)

Other countries

24.4

(63.8)

(87.9)

51.4

(56.5)

102.8

Total income tax expense

(409.6)

(422.4)

(174.9)

(242.2)

(462.0)

(399.7)

A number of French subsidiaries elected to form a consolidated tax group with Veolia Environnement as the head company, with effect from January 1, 2001 (five-year agreement, renewed in 2006). Veolia Environnement is liable to the French treasury department for the full income tax charge, calculated based on the group tax return. Any tax savings are recognized at the level of Veolia Environnement SA level.SA.

The U.S. tax group was reorganized in 2006. This reorganization is still being reviewed by the U.S. tax authorities (see Notes 12 and 35).

The Group bears a net income tax expense of -€242.2 million in fiscal year 2009, compared to -€462.0 million in fiscal year 2008.

As a percentage of net income from continuing operations adjusted for this tax charge and the share of net income of associates, the effective tax rate is 21.5% in 2009 compared to 45.6% in 2008.

The decrease in this tax rate is mainly due to:

the tax expense in 2006 is due to two opposing items:

·

an increaseinclusion in the Group scope2008 effective tax rate of consolidationthe consequences of unfavorable changes in regulations, asset impairments without tax savings and pre-tax income, which increased both the current and deferred tax expense;contribution of loss-making subsidiaries without profit forecasts enabling the future recovery of these losses;

·

the restructuringpositive impact in 2009 of the U.S.low tax group which generated a deferredrate applicable to capital gains on disposals and the capitalization of additional tax credit of €86.2 million, classified as non-recurring (included in “Other countries”losses in the deferred tax expense).United States in the amount of €43 million.


Effective tax rate


Year ended
December 31, 2009

Year ended
December 31,2008

Year ended
December 31,2007

Net income from ordinary activities before tax

1,125.5

1,012.6

1,656.5

Income tax expense

(242.2)

(462.0)

(399.7)

Legal tax rate

34.43%

34.93%

35.43%

34.43%

34.43%

34.43%

Impairment losses on goodwill not deductible for tax purposes

0.17%

0.81%

3.22%

0.15%

8.81%

+0.11%

Differences in tax rate

-5.78%

-1.70%

-4.84%

-2.88%

-0.38%

-7.56%

Effect of tax projections

-6.09%

-6.62%

-22.59%

-9.66%

-6.62%

-4.70%

Dividends

1.47%

2.48%

8.54%

+4.3%

+2.66%

+2.15%

Taxation without basis

0.71%

1.18%

1.74%

+1.32%

+4.50%

+1.68%

Share-based compensation

0.80%

0.71%

0.30%

Capital gains and losses on disposals

-6.32%

-1.38%

-1.69%

Other

3.59%

3.11%

0.26%

+0.2%

+3.61%

-0.30%

Effective tax rate

29.30%

34.90%

22.06%

21.5%

45.6%

24.1%


The effective tax rate is computed by dividing the current and deferred tax expense by pre-tax net income from continuing operations before the share of net income of associates.



Note 28

F-75



Back to Contents


NOTE 23

Share of net income of associates

The Shareshare of net income of associates decreasedfell from €22€19.4 million in 2004 (adjusted)2008 to €6.5€1.4 million in 2005 (adjusted) to €6.0 million in 2006.2009.

This relative stabilitydecrease in 2005 and 2006 ismainly due in part to the inclusionsale of the investment in Compagnie Méridionale de Navigation held by SNCM, which generated net income (Group share) in 2006 of €5.1 million and in part to a provision of €7.4 million recorded in respect of project companies in the Waste ManagementTransportation Division in Asia, following the termination by the customer of the related contracts.



2009.

Note 29NOTE 24

Net income fromAssets classified as held for sale, discontinued operations and divestitures

During the first half of 2006, Veolia Environnement decided to withdraw from its partnership with the Royal Bank of Scotland in the Water sector in the United Kingdom and to sell its investment in Southern Water. Given the impact on Water business in the United Kingdom and the unwinding of commitments at Veolia Environnement level, this transaction was recorded in the accounts in net income from discontinued operations in accordance with IFRS 5.




Back to contents



In addition, Group management decided to sell the Transportation Division activities in Denmark which were transferredsold on August 31, 2007. This business was classified in discontinued operations for accounting purposes.

At the end of December 2008, the Clemessy and Crystal businesses in the accounts to discontinued operations.Energy Services Division were sold for a consideration, excluding selling costs, of €299.6 million, received in full on December 16, 2008. Net cash and cash equivalents of the entities sold was €73.3 million at that date. The enterprise value of the businesses sold was, therefore, €226.3 million.

MovementsThe amount recorded in net income from discontinued operations:


(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31,2005 adjusted

Year ended December 31,2004 adjusted

Income from discontinued operations

(53.8)

0.7

156.7

Capital gains and losses on disposal

3.8

-

(102.3)

Income tax expense

50.6

-

(92.5)

Net income from discontinued operations

0.6

0.7

(38.1)


Breakdown of Net income from discontinued operations in 2006:respect of the Clemessy and Crystal businesses in the Energy Services Division in 2008, comprises the net income for the period plus the capital gain on disposal, net of tax.

During the second half of 2009, the business of waste-to-energy entities in the United States (Montenay International) in the Environmental Services Division and Freight activities (primarily in France, Germany and the Netherlands) in the Transportation Division, were sold for enterprise values of €220 million and €94 million respectively.

In addition, the Group decided to sell its activities in the United Kingdom in the Transportation Division and its renewable energy activities. These businesses were presented for fiscal year 2009 in the line “Net income from discontinued operations”. This heading includes market value adjustments to certain assets held for sale.

In the Consolidated Income Statements presented for comparative purposes, the net income of these businesses for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was transferred to “Net income from discontinued operations”.

Movements in net income (expense) from discontinued operations are as follows:

(€ million)

Year ended
December 31, 2009

Year ended
December 31,2008

Year ended
December 31,2007

Income(expense) from discontinued operations

(64.8)

(36.8)

(19.8)

Capital gains and losses on disposal

92.4

176.5

0.7

Income tax expense

(70.4)

(0.5)

-

Net income(expense) from discontinued operations

(42.8)

139.2

(19.1)


Net income (expense) from discontinued operations in2009 breaks down by division as follows:

(€ million)

Environmental Services

Transportation

Energy Services

Total

Income (expense) from discontinued operations

(0.1)

(52.6)

(12.1)

 (64.8)

Capital gains and losses on disposal

134.6

(42.2)

 

 92.4

Income tax expense

(70.4)

  

 (70.4)

Net income (expense) from discontinued operations

64.1

(94.8)

(12.1)

 (42.8)




F-76


(€ millions)

Southern Water (1)

Danish transportation activities (2)

Total

Income from discontinued operations

(1.9)

(51.9)

(53.8)

Capital gains and losses on disposal

3.8

-

3.8

Income tax expense

50.6

-

50.6

Net income from discontinued operations

52.5

(51.9)

0.6


(1) activity sold in 2006.

(2) decision taken in 2006 by Group managementBack to sell in 2007.Contents


The main Consolidated Income Statement items for discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 are2009 break down by division as follows:


(€ millions)

Southern Water

Danish transportation activities

Total

(€ million)

Environmental Services

Transportation

Energy Services

Total

Revenue

-

108.2

108.2

143.9

247.7

18.2

409.8

Operating income

(4.4)

(51.2)

(55.6)

-

(44.3)

(11.2)

(55.5)

Financial items

-

(2.6)

(2.6)

(0.1)

(9.2)

1.8

(7.5)

Income tax expense

-

1.9

1.9

-

1.1

(0.5)

0.6

Share of net income of associates

2.5

-

2.5

-

(0.2)

(2.2)

(2.4)

Minority interests

-

-

Income from discontinued operations

(1.9)

(51.9)

(53.8)

Income (expense) from discontinued operations

(0.1)

(52.6)

(12.1)

(64.8)



Breakdown of Net income (expense) from discontinued operations in 2005.2008 breaks down by division as follows:


(€ millions)

Southern Water

Danish transportation activities

Total

Income from discontinued operations

8.4

(7.7)

0.7

Capital gains and losses on disposal

-

-

-

Income tax expense

-

-

-

Net income from discontinued operations

8.4

(7.7)

0.7





Back to contents


(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Total

Income (expense) from discontinued operations

1.9

12.5

2.5

(53.7)

(36.8)

Capital gains and losses on disposal

-

-

176.5

-

176.5

Income tax expense

-

-

(0.5)

-

(0.5)

Net income (expense) from discontinued operations

1.9

12.5

178.5

(53.7)

139.2


The main Consolidated Income Statement items for discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2005 are2008 break down by division as follows:


(€ millions)

Southern Water

Danish transportation activities

Total

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Total

Revenue

-

122.7

122.7

-

171.6

623.2

266.0

1,060.8

Operating income

-

(6.0)

(6.0)

1.9

20.3

5.6

(28.6)

(0.8)

Financial items

-

(1.7)

(1.7)

-

(1.2)

0.4

(26.0)

(26.8)

Income tax expense

-

-

-

-

(6.6)

(2.5)

0.9

(8.2)

Share of net income of associates

8.4

-

8.4

-

-

(1.0)

-

(1.0)

Minority interests

-

-

-

Income from discontinued operations

8.4

(7.7)

0.7

Income (expense) from discontinued operations

1.9

12.5

2.5

(53.7)

(36.8)


Breakdown of Net income (expense) from discontinued operations in 2004.2007 breaks down by division as follows:


(€ millions)

Water activities in the United States (1)

FCC (1)

U.K. Transportation activities (1)

Southern Water

Danish transportation activities

Total

Income from discontinued operations

(1.4)

171.2

(1.9)

2.2

(13.4)

156.7

Capital gains and losses on disposal

(99.5)

(2.8)

-

-

-

(102.3)

Income tax expense

(61.3)

(31.2)

-

-

-

(92.5)

Net income from discontinued operations

(162.2)

137.2

(1.9)

2.2

(13.4)

(38.1)

(1) activities sold in 2004

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Total

Income (expense) from discontinued operations

(1.9)

1.7

11.4

(31.0)

(19.8)

Capital gains and losses on disposal

-

-

-

0.7

0.7

Income tax expense

    

-

Net income (expense) from discontinued operations

(1.9)

1.7

11.4

(30.3)

(19.1)


The main Consolidated Income Statement items for discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 20042007 break down by division as follows:

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Total

Revenue

157.1

696.0

266.5

1,119.6

Operating income

(1.9)

21.7

14.4

(20.8)

13.4

Financial items

(2.0)

(1.0)

(9.6)

(12.6)

Income tax expense

(18.0)

(2.2)

(0.2)

(20.4)

Share of net income of associates

 -

0.2

(0.4)

(0.2)

Income (expense) from discontinued operations

(1.9)

1.7

11.4

(31.0)

(19.8)




F-77



Back to Contents


The statement of financial position of the sub-groups sold or in the progress of being sold are as follows:

Montenay International sub-group (Environmental Services)

The statement of financial position as of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 of the North American portfolio of incineration contracts sold during 2009 is as follows.

(€ million)

As of f

As of f

 

December 31, 2008

December 31, 2007

ASSETS

  

Non-current assets

130.7

131.7

Current assets

51.8

50.0

Cash and cash equivalents

15

4.3

Total assets

197.5

186.0

EQUITY AND LIABILITIES

 

 

Equity

123.5

116.2

Non-current liabilities

59.0

64.8

Current liabilities

15.0

5.0

Total equity and liabilities

197.5

186.0


(€ millions)

Water activities in the United States

FCC

Southern Water

U.K. Transportation activities

Danish transportation activities

Total

Revenue

878.3

1,488.7

-

-

128.1

2,495.1

Operating income

23.6

174.6

-

(1.9)

(8.1)

188.2

Financial items

(5.0)

(4.3)

-

-

(1.7)

(11.0)

Income tax expense

(7.9)

(34.8)

-

-

(3.6)

(46.3)

Share of net income of associates

(12.1)

35.7

2.2

-

-

25.8

Income from discontinued operations

(1.4)

171.2

2.2

(1.9)

(13.4)

156.7

Freight sub-group (Transportation)

The statement of financial position as of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 of the Freight business, primarily in France, Germany and the Netherlands, sold during 2009 is as follows:

(€ million)

As of f

As of f

 

December 31, 2008

December 31, 2007

ASSETS

  

Non-current assets

203.3

172.5

Current assets

102.1

68.0

Cash and cash equivalents

12.8

3.4

Total assets

318.2

243.9

EQUITY AND LIABILITIES

  

Equity

53.0

79.4

Non-current liabilities

20.4

11.0

Current liabilities

244.8

153.5

Total equity and liabilities

318.2

243.9


Businesses in the process of being sold impacted the Group Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as follows:

(€ million)

As of

As of

As of

 

December 31, 2009

December 31, 2008

December 31, 2007

Assets classified as held for sale

722.6

203.0

122.5

    

Liabilities directly associated with assets classified a held for sale

309.4

98.2

1.9


As of December 31, 2009, assets classified as held for sale mainly concern certain French subsidiaries held jointly with Suez Environnement, as was the case at December 31, 2008, renewable energy activities, the transportation business in the United Kingdom and Dalkia Usti businesses (Czech Republic).



F-78



Back to contentsContents



Note 30

Net income for the year attributable to minority interests

Net income attributable to minority interests for the year ended December 31, 2006 is €236.2 million, compared to €172.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005, adjusted. This item concerns minority interests in subsidiaries.NOTE 25

Net income for the year attributable to minoritynon-controlling interests

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests for the year ended December 31, 2009 is €257.8 million, compared to €304.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 and €326.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. In 2008, this item included the share of non-controlling interests in the capital gain realized on the sale of Clemessy and Crystal in the Energy Services Division for €60 million.

Net income for the year attributable to non-controlling interests breaks down by division as follows:follows

(€ million)

 

Year ended
December 31, 2009

Year ended
December 31,2008

Year ended
December 31,2007

Water

(a)

144.7

118.9

178.9

Environmental Services

 

4.7

18.3

21.8

Energy Services

(b)

97.9

144.8

96.4

Transportation

 

6.6

19.4

28.9

Other

 

3.9

2.7

0.9

Non-controlling interests

 

257.8

304.1

326.9


(a)

 Including non-controlling interests in Germany (Berlin water services company and Stadtwerke of Braunschweig) of €120.5 million in 2007, €75.9 million in 2008 and €96.4 million in 2009.

(b)

Including EDF’s interest in Dalkia Holding of €68.2 million in 2007, €121.7 million in 2008 and €63.1 million in 2009.


NOTE 26

Earnings per share

Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income attributable to ordinary shareholders of the parent company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the fiscal year.

Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income attributable to ordinary shareholders of the parent company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the fiscal year plus the weighted average number of ordinary shares that would be issued following the conversion into ordinary shares of all potentially dilutive ordinary shares.

The weighted average number of shares outstanding used to calculate earnings per share for 2008 and 2007 was adjusted following the scrip dividend performed in June 2009.



F-79


(€ millions)

 

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31,2005 adjusted

Year ended December 31,2004 adjusted

Water

(a)

115.7

83.1

47.6

Waste Management

(b)

18.6

25.7

21.6

Energy Services

(c)

87.1

54.7

50.7

Transportation

(d)

14.7

9.7

13.6

Other

 

0.1

(0.3)

(0.2)

Discontinued Operations

   

78.8

Minority interests

 

236.2

172.9

212.1


(a)

Including minority interests in Germany (Water Berlin and Stadtwerke of Braunschweig): €69 million in 2006 and €50 million in 2005.

(b)

Including €8.6 million in 2005 and €7.1 million in 2006 for Onyx Hong Kong and €11.9 million in 2005 and €3.8 million in 2006 for Marius Pedersen.

(c)

Including EDF’s interest in Dalkia Holding for €41 million in 2005 and €58.1 million for 2006 and the Lodz contract for €2.2 million in 2005 and €13.1 million in 2006 (with 22% increase in minority interest share).

(d)

Including MBCR Boston in the United States for €5.5 million in 2005 and €3.6 million in 2006 and SNCM for €7.9 million in 2006 (newly consolidated company).Back to Contents



Note 31

EarningsNet income and the number of shares used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share are presented below for all businesses.


 

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31,2005 adjusted

Year ended December 31,2004 adjusted

Weighted average number of ordinary shares

   

Weighted average number of ordinary shares for the calculation of basic earnings per share

393.8

390.4

396.2

Theoretical number of additional shares resulting from the exercise of share purchase and subscription options

3.8

2.0

0.1

Weighted average number of ordinary shares for the calculation of diluted earnings per share

397.6

392.4

396.3

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent per share

   

Net income for the year attributable to equity holders of the parent

758.7

622.2

389.8

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent per share:

   

Basic

1.93

1.59

0.98

Diluted

1.91

1.59

0.98

Net income from discontinuing operations per share

   

Net income (expense) from discontinuing operations

0.6

0.7

(38.1)

Net income from discontinuing operations per share:

   

Basic

-

-

(0.10)

Diluted

-

-

(0.09)

Net income from continuing operations attributable to equity holders of the parent per share

   

Net income for the year attributable to equity holders of the parent

758.1

621.5

506.7

Net income from continuing operations attributable to equity holders of the parent per share:

   

Basic

1.93

1.59

1.47

Diluted

1.91

1.58

1.47

 

Year ended
December 31,
2009

Year ended
December 31,
2008

Year ended
December 31,
2007

Weighted average number of ordinary shares (in millions)

   

Weighted average number of ordinary shares for the calculation of basic earnings per share

471.7

462.2

434.8

Theoretical number of additional shares resulting from the exercise of share purchase and subscription options

 

1.8

5.0

Weighted average number of ordinary shares for the calculation of diluted earnings per share (in millions)

471.7

464.0

439.8

Net income attributable to owners of the Company per share (€ million)

   

Net income attributable to owners of the Company

584.1

405.1

927.9

Net income attributable to owners of the Company per share:

   

Basic

1.24

0.88

2.13

Diluted

1.24

0.87

2.11

Net income (expense) from discontinued operations attributable to owners of the Company per share
(€ million)

   

Net income(expense) from discontinued operations attributable to owners of the Company

(41.7)

75.1

(25.3)

Net income(expense) from discontinued operations attributable to owners of the Company per share:

   

Basic

(0.09)

0.16

(0.06)

Diluted

(0.09)

0.16

(0.06)

Net income from continuing operations attributable to owners of the Company per share (€ million)

   

Net income from continuing operations attributable to owners of the Company

625.8

330.0

953.2

Net income from continuing operations attributable to owners of the Company per share:

   

Basic

1.33

0.71

2.19

Diluted

1.33

0.71

2.17


As of December 31, 2006, share purchase and subscription options were theThe only potentially dilutive instruments outstanding.

The theoretical number of additional shares is based on the share option plans. The number of additional shares is calculated taking into account the difference between the 2000 plan exercise of €31.92, the 2001 plan exercise price of €41.25, the 2002 plan exercise plan of €37.25, the 2003 plan exercise price of €22.50, the 2004 plan exercise price of €24.72 and the 2006 plan exercise price of €44.75 and the average price of therecognized by Veolia Environnement are share in 2006 of €44.67.subscription and purchase options.




F-80



Back to contentsContents


NOTE 27

Additional information on the fair value of financial assets and liabilities (excluding derivatives)

Fair value measurement principles are presented in Note 1.27.

27.1

Financial assets

The following tables present the net carrying amount and fair value of Group financial assets as of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007:

  

As of December 31, 2009

  

Net carrying amount

Financial assets at fair value

Fair value

Method of determining fair value

(€ million)

Note

 

Available-for-sale assets

Loans and receivables

Assets designated at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement

 

Prices quoted in an
active market

Fair value determined using models integrating observable market data

Fair value determined using models integrating certain data not observable on the market

Non-consolidated investments

9

174.6

174.6

  

174.6

39.8

134.8

 

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,651.8

 

5,651.8

 

5,656.6

 

5,656.6

 

Other non-current financial assets

11

753.9

52.6

701.3

 

753.9

 

753.9

 

Trade receivables

13

9,081.3

 

9,081.3

 

9,081.3

 

9,081.3

 

Other current operating receivables

13

1,101.2

 

1,101.2

 

1,101.2

 

1,101.2

 

Other current financial assets

11

217.7

53.8

163.9

 

217.7

 

217.7

 

Cash and cash equivalents

14

5,614.4

  

5 614.4

5,614.4

1,310.4

4,304.0

 

Total

 

22,594.9

281.0

16,699.5

5 614.4

22,599.7

1,350.2

21,249.5

 


  

As of December 31, 2008

  

Net carrying amount

Financial assets at fair value

Fair value

Method of determining fair value

(€ million)

Note

 

Available-for-sale assets

Loans and receivables

Assets designated at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement

 

Prices quoted in an
active market

Fair value determined using models integrating observable market data

Fair value determined using models integrating certain data not observable on the market

Non-consolidated investments

9

202.8

202.8

  

202.8

X

X

 

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,751.2

 

5,751.2

 

5,666 .9

 

X

 

Other non-current financial assets

11

817.3

77.7

739.6

 

817.3

 

X

 

Trade receivables

13

9,702.0

 

9,702.0

 

9,702.0

 

X

 

Other current operating receivables

13

1,254.5

 

1,254.5

 

1,254.5

 

X

 

Other current financial assets

11

321.4

66.0

255.4

 

321.4

X

X

X

Cash and cash equivalents

14

3,849.6

  

3,849.6

3,849.6

X

X

 

Total

 

21,898.8

346.5

17,702.7

3,849.6

21,814.5

   




F-81



Back to Contents



  

As of December 31, 2007

  

Net carrying amount per IAS 39 category

Fair value

(€ million)

Note

Total

Available-for-sale assets

Loans and receivables

Assets designated at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement

Total

Available-for-sale assets

Loans and receivables

Assets designated at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement

Non-consolidated investments

9

256.1

256.1

-

-

256.1

256.1

-

-

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,627.6

-

5,627.6

-

5,666.2

-

5,666.2

-

Other non-current financial assets

11

746.0

231.0

515.0

-

746.0

231.0

515.0

-

Trade receivables

13

9,303.7

-

9,303.7

-

9,303.7

-

9,303.7

-

Other current operating receivables

13

1,433.0

-

1,433.0

-

1,433.0

-

1,433.0

-

Other current financial assets

11

330.0

177.2

152.8

-

330.0

177.2

152.8

-

Cash and cash equivalents

14

3,115.6

-

-

3,115.6

3,115.6

-

-

3,115.6

Total

 

20,812.0

664.3

17,032.1

3,115.6

20,850.6

664.3

17,070.7

3,115.6


Note 3227.2

Derivative instruments accounting positionFinancial liabilities

The following tables present the net carrying amount and managementfair value of market risksfinancial liabilities by category as of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007:

  

As of December 31, 2009

  

Net carrying amount

Financial liability at fair value

Fair value

Method of determining fair value

(€ million)

Note

Total

Liabilities at amortized cost

Liabilities at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement

Liabilities at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement and held for trading

Total

Prices quoted in an
active market

Fair value determined using models integrating observable market data

Fair value determined using models integrating certain data not observable on the market

Borrowings and other financial liabilities

         

- non-current bonds

17

13,264.5

13,264.5

  

13,810.5

13,321.2

489.3

 

- other non-current borrowings

17

4,382.8

4,382.8

  

4,385.3

 

4,385.3

 

- current borrowings

14

2,983.1

2,983.1

  

2,983.1

 

2,983.1

 

- bank overdrafts and other cash position items

14

454.9

454.9

  

454.9

 

454.9

 

Trade payables

13

5,311.0

5,311.0

  

5,311.0

 

5,311.0

 

Other operating payables

13

4,933.4

4,933.4

  

4,933.4

 

4,933.4

 

Total

 

31,329.7

31,329.7

  

31,878.2

13,321.2

18,557.0

 




F-82



Back to Contents


In the course of its operating

  

As of December 31, 2008

  

Net carrying amount per IAS 39 category

Fair value

(€ million)

Note

Total

Liabilities at amortized cost

Liabilities at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement

Liabilities at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement and held for trading

Total

Liabilities at amortized cost

Liabilities at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement

Liabilities at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement and held for trading

Borrowings and other financial liabilities

         

- non-current bonds

17

11,097.6

11,097.6

9,836.9

9,836.9

- other non-current borrowings

17

5,966.3

5,966.3

 -

 -

5,227.4

5,227.4

 -

 -

- current borrowings

14

3,219.7

3,219.7

 -

 -

3,219.7

3,219.7

 -

 -

- bank overdrafts and other cash position items

14

465.7

465.7

 -

 -

465.7

465.7

 -

 -

Other non-current debt

17

-

-

 -

 -

-

-

 -

 -

Trade payables

13

5,634.5

5,634.5

  

5,634.5

5,634.5

  

Other operating payables

13

5,112.3

5,112.3

 -

 -

5,112.3

5,112.3

 -

 -

Total

 

31,496.1

31,496.1

-

-

29,496.5

29,496.5

-

-


  

As of December 31, 2007

  

Net carrying amount per IAS 39 category

Fair value

(€ million)

Note

Total

Liabilities at amortized cost

Liabilities at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement

Liabilities at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement and held for trading

Total

Liabilities at amortized cost

Liabilities at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement

Liabilities at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement and held for trading

Borrowings and other financial liabilities

         

- non-current bonds

17

9,009.6

9,009.6

-

-

8,747.8

8,747.8

-

-

- other non-current borrowings

17

4,938.4

4,938.4

-

-

4,761.6

4,761.6

-

-

- current borrowings

14

3,805.0

3,805.0

-

-

3,805.0

3,805.0

-

-

- bank overdrafts and other cash position items

14

459.4

459.4

-

-

459.4

459.4

-

-

Other non-current debt

17

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Trade payables

13

5,343.8

5,343.8

  

5,343.8

5,343.8

  

Other operating payables

13

5,009.4

5,009.4

-

-

5,009.4

5,009.4

-

-

Total

 

28,565.6

28,565.6

-

-

28,127.0

28,127.0

-

-




F-83



Back to Contents


NOTE 28

Derivatives

The Group uses derivatives to manage and financing activities, the Group is exposed to the following market risks: interest rate risk, foreign exchange risk, counterparty risk, liquidity risk and equity risk.

In order to reduce its exposure to these risks, Veolia Environnement centralizes the management of these financial risks in order to ensure better control. Activities are based on the management rules detailed in the internal manual “Rules governing financing/treasury management and related risks” widely distributed to Group entities. These rules are based on the principles of security, transparency and effectiveness.

Veolia Environnement uses various derivative instruments to reduce and manage its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates, exchange rates and commodity prices not all(see Note 29, Risk Management).

The fair value of which qualify for hedge accounting. All these derivatives are recognized in the balance sheet at fair value.Consolidated Statement of Financial Position breaks down as follows:

  

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31,2008

As of
December 31, 2007

(€ million)

Notes

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Interest-rate derivatives

28.1

355.0

76.6

389.1

116.8

71.1

113.0

Fair value hedges

 

351.5

8.3

378.9

7.4

21.2

48.9

Cash flow hedges

 

-

59.6

0.3

96.6

11.8

41.0

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

 

3.5

8.7

9.9

12.8

38.1

23.1

Foreign currency derivatives

28.2

58.6

103.9

 172.7

61.7

105.2

49.2

Net investment hedges

 

13.1

17.1

65.1

 8.0

78.3

13.6

Fair value hedges

 

7.9

0.6

    

Cash flow hedges

 

8.8

0.3

    

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

 

28.8

85.9

 107.6

53.7

26.9

35.6

Commodity derivatives

28.3

63.9

43.6

89.4

 107.3

61.8

35.6

Total derivatives

 

477.5

224.1

 651.2

285.8

238.1

197.8

o/w non-current derivatives

 

431.9

139.3

508.4

159.9

123.7

163.8

o/w current derivatives

 

45.6

84.8

142.8

125.9

114.4

34.0


The fair value of derivative instrumentsderivatives recognized in the balance sheetConsolidated Statement of Financial Position is determined and breaks down as follows:


(€ millions)

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

 

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Interest rate derivatives

80.9

77.4

195.7

97.8

338.0

159.7

Fair value hedges

45.2

16.3

164.7

2.5

286.0

-

Cash flow hedges

6.8

48.4

-

88.6

0.5

82.4

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

28.9

12.7

31.0

6.7

51.5

77.3

Foreign exchange derivatives

56.5

42.7

18.0

31.5

82.3

30.1

Net investment hedge

42.0

4.3

13.9

0.3

71.9

-

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

14.5

38.4

4.1

31.2

10.4

30.1

Other derivative instruments including commodity derivatives

64.2

25.8

35.3

25.2

4.5

-

Total derivative instruments

201.6

145.9

249.0

154.5

424.8

189.8

 

As of
December 31, 2009

Internal model with observable parameters

(%)

Internal model with certain non-observable parameters

(%)

(€ million)

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Interest-rate derivatives

355.0

76.6

100%

100%

  

Foreign currency derivatives

58.6

103.9

100%

100%

  

Commodity derivatives

63.9

43.6

35.2%

84.2%

64.8%

15.8%

Total derivatives

477.5

224.1

91.3%

96.9%

8.7%

3.1%


(a)Derivatives valued using internal models integrating certain non-observable data are electricity derivatives for which there are no quoted prices in an active market (notably electricity purchase options with extremely long maturity) or observable market data (forward prices for component materials), in particular for distant maturities. In such cases, parameters are estimated by Veolia Environnement experts.


 

As of
December 31, 2008

Internal model with observable parameters

(%)

Internal model with certain non-observable parameters

(%)

(€ million)

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Interest-rate derivatives

389.1

116.8

100 %

100 %

-

-

Foreign currency derivatives

172.7

61.7

100 %

100 %

-

-

Commodity derivatives

89.4

107.3

34.4 %

83.9 %

65.6 %

16.1 %

Total derivatives

651.2

285.8

91.0 %

94.0 %

9.0 %

6.0 %




F-84



Back to Contents



 

As of
December 31, 2007

Internal model with observable parameters

(%)

Internal model with certain non-observable parameters

(%)

(€ million)

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Interest-rate derivatives

71.1

113.0

100.0%

100.0%

-

-

Foreign currency derivatives

105.2

49.2

100.0%

100.0%

-

-

Commodity derivatives

61.8

35.6

27.5 %

56.7 %

72.5 %

43.3 %

Total derivatives

238.1

197.8

81.2 %

92.2 %

18.8 %

7.8 %


28.1

Interest Rate Risk Management


rate derivatives

The Group’sfair value of interest rate derivatives recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position breaks down as follows:

 

Note

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31,2008

As of
December 31,2007

(€ million)

 

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Interest-rate derivatives

 

355.0

76.6

389.1

116.8

71.1

113.0

Fair value hedges

28.1.1

351.5

8.3

378.9

7.4

21.2

48.9

Cash flow hedges

28.1.2

-

59.6

0.3

96.6

11.8

41.0

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

28.1.3

3.5

8.7

9.9

12.8

38.1

23.1


28.1.1

Interest rate fair value hedges

The risk of volatility in the value of debt is hedged by fixed-rate receiver/floating-rate payer swaps which change bond issues to floating-rate debt (see Notes 29 and 17).

Fair value hedging swaps represent a notional outstanding amount of €6,315.4 million as of December 31, 2009, with a net fair value in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position of €343.2 million, as follows:

Fixed-rate receiver /
floating-rate payer swaps

Notional contract amount by maturity

Fair value of derivatives

(€ million)

Total

Less than
1 year

1 to
5 years

More than
5 years

Total
assets

Total
liabilities

As of December 31, 2009

6,315.4

 

2,361.1

3,954.3

351.5

8.3

As of December 31,2008

5,357.4

-

1,812.4

3,545.0

378.9

7.4

As of December 31,2007

3,808.8

499.7

600.0

2,709.1

21.2

48.9


The increase in the fair value hedging portfolio is mainly due to:

the set-up of several floating-rate payer swaps hedging EMTN issues, in the total amount of €2,122 million;

and the early cancellation of certain EURIBOR-based swaps (Euro Interbank Offered Rate, interest rate on inter-bank exchanges in the euro-zone, for terms of 1 to 12 months) and swaps with extremely long maturity, in the amount of €1,165 million.

For euro-denominated debt, floating-rate payer swaps entered into in 2009 were all indexed to EONIA (European Overnight Index Average, overnight Euro rate).



F-85



Back to Contents


28.1.2

Cash flow hedges

Cash flow hedges comprise floating–rate receiver/fixed-rate payer swaps which fix interest payable on floating rate debt primarily secured to finance BOT (Build Operate Transfer) contracts, to the extent the underlying assets generate fixed-rate flows.

Floating-rate receiver/Fixed –rate payer swaps/purchases of caps

Notional contract amount by maturity

Fair value of derivatives

(€ million)

Total

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

As of December 31, 2009

997.2

230.9

202.1

564.2

-

59.6

As of December 31,2008

1,136.4

40.2

416.6

679.6

0.3

96.6

As of December 31,2007

1,715.3

305.9

811.1

598.3

11.8

41.0


-€57.3 million, net of tax, was recorded directly in equity (fair value reserves) in respect of cash flow hedge interest-rate derivatives as of December 31, 2009.

Contractual flows associated with interest rate swaps are paid at the same time as contractual flows in respect of floating-rate borrowings and the amount recorded in other comprehensive income is released to net income in the period in which interest flows on the debt impact the Consolidated Income Statement.

The decrease in the cash-flow hedging portfolio is mainly due to:

the set-up of new swaps in the amount of €17.6 million;

the expiry or cancellation of swaps in the amount of €81 million.

the amortization of the nominal of certain swaps in the amount of €76 million

Over and above the volume impact, the increase in the fair value of floating-rate payer swaps can also be attributed to the increase in U.S. dollar and pound sterling interest rates in 2009.

28.1.3

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

A certain number of derivatives do not qualify as hedges under IAS 39. The Group does not, however, consider these transactions to be of a speculative nature and views them as necessary for the effective management of its exposure to interest rate riskrisk.

 

Notional amounts
as ofDecember 31, 2009

Fair value
of derivatives

(€ million)

Total

Less
than
1 year

1 to
5 years

More
than
5 years

Total
assets

Total
liabilities

Fixed-rate receiver / floating-rate payer swaps

333.7

250.1

57.8

25.8

3.4

-

Floating-rate receiver / fixed-rate payer swaps

755.2

627.5

41.5

86.2

-

5.6

Floating-rate receiver / floating-rate payer swaps

200.0

-

-

200.0

-

1.4

Total firm financial instruments

1,288.9

877.6

99.3

312.0

3.4

7.0

Purchases of vanilla and structured caps

1,230.1

277.7

752.4

200.0

0.1

1.7

Sales of caps

-

-

-

-

-

-

Sales of swaptions

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total optional financial instruments

1,230.1

277.7

752.4

200.0

0.1

1.7

Total interest-rate derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

2,519.0

1,155.3

851.7

512.0

3.5

8.7


The increase in the portfolio of interest rate derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting is mainly attributabledue to:

the set-up of approximately €900 million of new options;

the cancellation or expiry of approximately €300 million of financial instruments;

the amortization of the nominal and the decrease in the number of short-term cash flow hedging swaps in the amount of €240 million.



F-86



Back to Contents


The break down as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 is as follows:

 

Notional amounts
as ofDecember 31, 2008

Fair value
of derivatives

(€ million)

Total

Less
than
1 year

1 to
5 years

More
than
5 years

Total
assets

Total
liabilities

Fixed-rate receiver / floating-rate payer swaps

202.4

-

41.7

160.7

3.7

-

Floating-rate receiver / fixed-rate payer swaps

513.9

468.9

2.5

42.5

-

2.0

Floating-rate receiver / floating-rate payer swaps

915.5

665.5

-

250.0

0.5

1.1

Fixed-rate receiver / fixed-rate payer swaps

2.0

-

-

2.0

-

4.0

Total firm financial instruments

1,633.8

1,134.4

44.2

455.2

4.2

7.1

Purchases of vanilla and structured caps

423.4

-

323.4

100.0

3.0

-

Sales of caps

-

-

-

-

-

-

Sales of swaptions

102.0

-

-

102.0

2.7

5.7

Total optional financial instruments

525.4

-

323.4

202.0

5.7

5.7

Total interest-rate derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

2,159.2

1,134.4

367.6

657.2

9.9

12.8


 

Notional amounts
as ofDecember 31, 2007

Fair value
of derivatives

(€ million)

Total

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

Fixed-rate receiver / floating-rate payer swaps

325.0

5.0

20.6

299.4

-

17.9

Floating-rate receiver / fixed-rate payer swaps

513.8

318.9

150.0

44.9

3.4

0.2

Floating-rate receiver / floating-rate payer swaps

150.0

-

-

150.0

0.7

-

Total firm financial instruments

988.8

323.9

170.6

494.3

4.1

18.1

Purchases of vanilla and structured caps

1,253.2

144.0

909.2

200.0

34.0

-

Sales of caps

75.1

75.1

-

-

-

-

Sales of swaptions

200.0

-

-

200.0

-

5.0

Total optional financial instruments

1,528.3

219.1

909.2

400.0

34.0

5.0

Total interest-rate derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

2,517.1

543.0

1,079.8

894.3

38.1

23.1


28.2

Foreign currency derivatives

The fair value of foreign currency derivatives recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position breaks down as follows:

  

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31,2008

As of
December 31,2007

(€ million)

Note

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Foreign currency derivatives

 

58.6

103.9

172.7

61.7

105.2

49.2

Net investment hedge

28.2.1

13.1

17.1

65.1

8.0

78.3

13.6

Fair value hedge

28.2.2

7.9

0.6

    

Cash flow hedge

28.2.3

8.8

0.3

    

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

28.2.4

28.8

67.4

104.7

53.7

26.9

11.8

Embedded derivatives

  

18.5

2.9

-

-

23.8




F-87



Back to Contents


28.2.1

Hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation

Financial instruments designated as net investment hedges break down as follows:

(€ million)

Notional amount
as of December 31, 2009
by currency and maturity

Fair value of derivatives

Financial instrument

Currency

Amount

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

 

AED

3.7

3.7

-

-

0.0

0.0

 

AUD

7.5

7.5

-

-

-

0.1

 

GBP

67.0

67.0

-

-

2.4

-

 

HKD

199.9

196.0

3.9

-

-

0.5

Currency payer swaps

HUF

86.9

86.9

-

-

0.0

0.5

 

ILS

17.9

17.9

-

-

-

0.0

 

JPY

60.3

60.3

-

-

0.6

-

 

MXN

1.0

1.0

-

-

0.0

-

 

PLN

5.8

5.8

-

-

-

0.5

Embedded derivatives (forward sale)

KRW

92.4

12.1

42.5

37.8

10.1

-

Cross currency swaps: fixed-rate payer /
fixed-rate receiver

CNY

120.0

-

60.0

60.0

-

15.5

Total foreign currency derivatives

 

662.4

458.2

106.4

97.8

13.1

17.1

USD borrowings

USD

1,339.8

-

411.6

928.2

N/A

N/A

GBP borrowings

GBP

731.9

-

-

731.9

N/A

N/A

Syndicated loan

CZK

190.3

190.3

-

-

N/A

N/A

Syndicated loan

PLN

219.8

-

219.8

-

N/A

N/A

Total financing

 

2,481.8

190.3

631.4

1,660.1

  


The above currency swaps are short-term but are generally renewed at maturity, until financing of an appropriate term is secured in the currency of the related country.

Fair value movements compared with December 31, 2008 are mainly due to:

the change in the fair value of euro/Chinese renminbi yuan cross currency swaps for -€35 million;

the change in the fair value of the Korean won embedded derivative for -€19 million.

Inter-company loans and receivables forming part of a foreign investment (IAS 21) are nearly systematically hedged by foreign currency external financing or foreign currency derivatives (cross currency swaps, currency forwards) meeting IAS 39 criteria for hedge accounting. Foreign exchange gains and losses recorded in foreign exchange translation reserves in respect of hedging instruments are systematically offset by foreign exchange gains and losses recognized in foreign exchange translation reserves on loans forming part of the net investment, unless:

the inter-company loan forming part of the net investment in a foreign operation is not hedged;

the hedge is partially ineffective due to a difference between the nominal amount of the hedge and the amount of the hedged net asset;

only the net assets of the foreign subsidiary (excluding the loan forming part of the net investment) are hedged.

Net foreign exchange losses recorded in foreign exchange translation reserves as of December 31, 2009 of -€46.6 million mainly comprise:

the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on hedges of Water Division investments in China, Korea, the Czech Republic and the United States of -€28.9 million;

the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on hedges of Veolia Environnement SA investments in the United States of - €10.6 million.



F-88



Back to Contents


Recap: the break down as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 is as follows:

(€ million)

Notional amount as of
December 31, 2008
by currency and maturity

Fair value
of derivatives

Financial instrument

Currency

Amount

Less
than
1 year

1 to 5
years

More than
5 years

Total
assets

Total
liabilities

 

AED

2.8

2.8

--

0.1

 
 

AUD

5.9

5.9

---

0.1

 

GBP

62.5

62.5

--

11.8

-

Currency payer swaps

HKD

171.6

171.6

--

0.2

4.8

 

HUF

42.4

42.4

--

0.5

-
 

ILS

18.3

18.3

--

1.1

-
 

JPY

63.7

63.7

---

0.2

 

MXN

1.0

1.0

----

Embedded derivatives (forward sale)

KRW

50.7

15.9

32.2

2.6

29.1

-

Cross currency swaps: fixed-rate payer / fixed-rate receiver

CNY

131.6

65.4

-

66.2

22.3

2.9

Total foreign currency derivatives

 

550.5

449.5

32.2

68.8

65.1

8.0

USPP borrowings

USD

1,221.9

-

306.8

915.1

N/A

N/A

GBP borrowings

GBP

682.4

--

682.4

N/A

N/A

Syndicated loan

CZK

187.5

-

187.5

-

N/A

N/A

Syndicated loan

PLN

199.1

-

199.1

-

N/A

N/A

Total financing

 

2,290.9

-

693.4

1,597.5

--


(€ million)

Notional amount as of
December 31, 2007
by currency
and maturity

Fair value
of derivatives

Financial instrument

Currency

Amount

Less than
1 year

1 to 5
years

More than
5 years

Total
assets

Total
liabilities

 

HKD

50.0

50.0

-

-

3.7

-

 

JPY

35.5

35.5

-

-

0.2

-

 

MXN

1.2

1.2

-

-

0.1

-

Currency payer swaps

PLN

82.7

82.7

-

-

-

0.3

 

GBP

272.7

272.7

-

-

-

0.8

 

AUD

7.2

7.2

-

-

0.1

-

 

USD

451.2

451.2

-

-

1.7

-

 

SKK

76.5

76.5

-

-

0.3

-

Embedded derivatives (forward sale)

KRW

66.5

15.9

48.1

2.5

7.8

-

Cross currency swaps: fixed-rate payer / fixed-rate receiver

CNY

116.2

57.8

58.4

0.2

12.5

Cross currency swaps: floating-rate payer / floating-rate receiver

USD

234.9

234.9

-

-

64.2

-

Total foreign currency derivatives

 

1,394.6

1,227.8

105.9

60.9

78.3

13.6

USPP borrowings

USD

247.1

-

18.3

228.8

N/A

N/A

GBP borrowings

GBP

681.8

-

-

681.8

N/A

N/A

Syndicated loan

CZK

189.2

-

189.2

-

N/A

N/A

Total financing

 

1,118.1

-

207.5

910.6

-

-




F-89



Back to Contents


28.2.2

Fair value hedges

Financial instruments designated as fair value hedges break down as follows:

(€ million)

Notional amount as of December 31, 2009
by currency and maturity

Fair value of derivatives

Financial instrument

Currency

Amount

Less
than
1 year

1 to
5 years

More
than
5 years

Total
assets

Total
liabilities

Forward sales

USD

48.9

45.8

3.1

-

2.9

-

Forward purchases

BRL

11.1

11.1

-

-

3.4

0.6

Forward purchases

NOK

39.4

 

39.4

-

1.6

-

Total foreign currency derivatives

 

99.4

56.9

42.5

-

7.9

0.6


In 2009, Veolia Environnement Group decided to designate a certain number of currency transactions as hedges as defined by IAS 39.

The majority of the fair value hedges presented above consist of foreign currency hedges in respect of construction contracts or hedging financial assets.

28.2.3

Cash flow hedges

Financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges break down as follows:

(€ million)

Notional amount as of December 31, 2009
by currency and maturity

Fair value of derivatives

Financial Instruments

Currency

Amount

Less
than
1 year

1 to
5 years

More
than
5 years

Total
assets

Total
liabilities

Forward purchases

NOK

115.3

20.3

64.2

30.8

7.1

-

Forward sales

USD

15.6

4.2

11.4

-

1.0

-

Forward purchases

USD

9.8

9.8

-

-

0.2

-

Forward purchases

SEK

8.9

7.5

1.4

-

-

0.3

Forward purchases

HUF

4.3

4.3

-

-

0.5

-

Total foreign currency derivatives

 

153.9

46.1

77.0

30.8

8.8

0.3


In 2009, Veolia Environnement Group decided to designate a certain number of currency transactions as hedges as defined by IAS 39.

The majority of the cash flow hedges presented above consist of currency hedges in respect of lease payments on a boat.



F-90



Back to Contents


28.2.4

Hedges of currency exposure in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position by derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

Fair value

As of December 31, 2009

(€ million)

Total

USD

GBP

NOK

SEK

KRW

Other

Forward purchases

(0.9)

(0.7)

(1.0)

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.8

Currency receiver swaps

10.3

8.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.0

1.7

Total currency swaps and forward purchases

9.4

7.5

(0.8)

0.1

0.1

0.0

2.5

Forward sales

(17.4)

2.0

(0.1)

0.1

0.0

(18.5)

(0.9)

Currency payer swaps

(49.1)

1.4

(17.6)

(11.1)

(11.4)

0.0

(10.4)

Total currency swaps and forward sales

(66.5)

3.4

(17.7)

(11.0)

(11.4)

(18.5)

(11.3)

Call options

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Put options

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total currency options

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

(57.1)

10.9

(18.5)

(10.9)

(11.3)

(18.5)

(8.8)


Hedges as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:

Faire value

As of December 31, 2008

(€ million)

Total

HKD

NOK

PLN

Other

Forward purchases

(11.6)

-

(5.0)

(2.3)

(4.3)

Currency receiver swaps

(20.6)

-

-

(1.7)

(18.9)

Total currency swaps and forward purchases

(32.2)

-

(5.0)

(4.0)

(23.2)

Forward sales

(1.6)

-

-

2.2

(3.8)

Currency payer swaps

86.8

28.3

19.3

12.0

27.2

Total currency swaps and forward sales

85.2

28.3

19.3

14.2

23.4

Call options

-

-

-

-

-

Put options

(2.0)

-

-

-

(2.0)

Total currency options

(2.0)

-

-

-

(2.0)

Total derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting(*)

51.0

28.3

14.3

10.2

(1.8)


Fair value

As of December 31, 2007

(€ million)

Total

USD

GBP

Other

Forward purchases

(4.2)

(4.5)

(0.1)

0.4

Currency receiver swaps

(1.8)

-

-

(1.8)

Total currency swaps and forward purchases

(6.0)

(4.5)

(0.1)

(1.4)

Forward sales

9.2

10.2

-

(1.0)

Currency payer swaps

11.5

5.1

3.2

3.2

Total currency swaps and forward sales

20.7

15.3

3.2

2.2

Call options

(0.4)

(0.4)

-

-

Put options

0.8

0.8

-

-

Total currency options

0.4

0.4

-

-

Total derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting(*)

15.1

11.2

3.1

0.8


(*)

Net fair value (Assets–Liabilities) excluding embedded derivatives

The above portfolio of foreign currency derivatives was mainly contracted by Veolia Environnement SA to hedge its foreign currency-denominated net debt (comprising foreign currency-denominated borrowings and foreign currency-denominated inter-company loans and borrowings).



F-91



Back to Contents


28.3

Commodity derivatives

As of December 31, 2009, the fair value of commodity derivatives totaled €63.9 million in assets and €43.6 million in liabilities.

  

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31,2008

(€ million)

Note

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Commodity derivatives

 

63.9

43.6

89.4

107.3

Electricity

 

53.1

18.3

56.3

18.3

Fuel

 

9.1

7.1

22.5

46.5

CO2

 

0.8

0.4

2.1

2.7

Coal

 

0.9

15.5

8.2

15.6

Other

 

-

2.3

0.3

24.2

Pursuant to IAS 39, these derivatives break down as follows:

  

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31,2008

(€ million)

Note

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Commodity derivatives

 

63.9

43.6

89.4

107.3

Fair value hedges

  

0.3

 

2.3

Cash flow hedges

 

10.0

23.9

32.1

64.3

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

 

53.9

19.4

57.3

40.8


Material contract notional amounts (electricity – see Note 1.24) are as follows.

28.3.1

Electricity

  

Notional contract amount as of

December 31, 2009 by maturity

(€ million)

 

Total

Less than
one year

1 to 5 years

More than
five years

Electricity purchase options:

in Gwh

13,196

1,052

2,934

9,210

 

in € million

696.0

55.2

158.4

482.4

Electricity sales commitments:

in Gwh

3,051

1,110

1,941

-

 

in € million

215.2

72.3

142.9

-


Purchase options cover the period 2010 to 2025 and represent a notional amount of €52.3 million, based on valuation assumptions at the year end. Sales commitments cover the period 2010 to 2011 and represent a notional amount of €17.7 million, based on the same valuation assumptions.

A 10% increase or decrease in the price of electricity (all other things being equal) would have an impact on net income of +€1.2 million and -€0.9 million, respectively.



F-92



Back to Contents



  

Notional contract amount as of

December 31, 2008 by maturity

(€ million)

 

Total

Less than
one year

1 to 5 years

More than
five years

Electricity purchase options:

in Gwh

12,854

868

3,063

8,923

 

in € million

667.5

41.9

159.5

466.1

Electricity sales commitments:

in Gwh

3,817

824

2,993

-

 

in € million

250.6

38.2

212.4

-


  

Notional contract amount as of

December 31, 2007by maturity

(€ million)

 

Total

Less than
one year

1 to 5 years

More than
five years

Electricity purchase options:

in Gwh

15,280

935

3,445

10,900

 

in € million

749.6

50.3

169.3

530.0

Electricity sales commitments:

in Gwh

3,202

1,032

2,170

-

 

in € million

177.1

55.7

121.4

-


28.3.2

Greenhouse gas emission rights

Other transactions not qualifying for hedge accounting relate to contracts swapping greenhouse gas emission rights for Carbon Emission certificates, maturing at the end of 2010, 2011 and 2012. These transactions are recorded in assets in the amount of €0.5 million and the impact on the Consolidated Income Statement is a net income of €0.8 million. 



F-93



Back to Contents


NOTE 29

Financial risk management

Group objectives and organization

The Group is exposed to the following financial risks in the course of its operating and financial activities:

Market risks, presented in Note 29.1:

-

interest-rate risk, presented in Note 29.1.1 (interest-rate fair value hedges, cash flow hedges and derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting),

-

foreign exchange risk, presented in Note 29.1.2 (hedges of a net investment in a foreign operation, hedges of balance sheet foreign exchange exposure by derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting, embedded derivatives, overall foreign exchange risk exposure),

-

commodity risk, presented in Note 29.1.3 (fuel and electricity risks, greenhouse gas emission rights).

Equity risk, presented in Note 29.2.

Liquidity risk, presented in Note 29.3

Credit risk, presented in Note 29.4

29.1

Market risk management

29.1.1

Management of interest rate risk

The financing structure of the Group exposes it naturally to the risk of interest rate fluctuations. As such, floating-rate debt net of cashimpacts future financial results.

Short-term debt is primarily indexed to short-term indexes (Eonia for the treasury note program and cash equivalents. Euribor/Libor for the main short-term credit lines). Medium and long-term debt comprises both fixed and floating-rate debt.

The Group manages a structural fixed/floating rate position in each currency in order to limit the impact of interest rate fluctuations on its net income and to optimize the cost of debt. For this purpose, it uses firm and optional interest rate swap instruments (swaps, caps, floors, etc.).and swaption instruments.


The fair value of interest rate derivatives recognized in the balance sheet breaks down as follows:


(€ millions)

Note

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

 

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Interest rate derivatives

 

80.9

77.4

195.7

97.8

338.0

159.7

Fair value hedges

a-1

45.2

16.3

164.7

2.5

286.0

-

Cash flow hedges

a-2

6.8

48.4

-

88.6

0.5

82.4

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

a-3

28.9

12.7

31.0

6.7

51.5

77.3

The financing structure of the Group exposes it naturally to the risk of interest rate fluctuations. As such, fixed-rate debt is exposed to a risk of change in fair value if repurchased on the market, while floating-rate debt exposes future financial results.


Short-term debt is primarily indexed to short-term indexes (Eonia for the treasury note program and Euribor/Libor for the main short-term credit lines). The medium- and long-term debt comprises both fixed- and floating- rate debt. Borrowings are primarily denominated in euro, pound sterling, U.S. dollar, Czech crown, Moroccan dirham and Chinese yuan.





Back to contents



Fixed/floating rate breakdown of gross debt:


(€ millions)

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

 

Out-standing

% total debt

Out-standing

% total debt

Out-standing

% total debt

Fixed rate

11,290.6

65,1%

10,586.5

65.3%

9,651.4

54.8%

Floating rate

6,042.3

34.9%

5,619.0

34.7%

7,966.6

45.2%

Total before hedging

17,332.9

100.0%

16,205.5

100.0%

17,618.0

100.0%

Fixed rate

9,119.8

52.6%

8,494.8

52.4%

7,166.8

40.7%

Capped floating rate

1,862.6

10.8%

1,751.0

10.8%

1,989.7

11.3%

Floating rate

6,350.5

36.6%

5,959.7

36.8%

8,461.5

48.0%

Total after hedging

17,332.9

100.0%

16,205.5

100.0%

17,618.0

100.0%

Fair value adjustments to hedging derivatives

28.8

 

162.3

 

284.0

 

Total Long- and short-term borrowing

17,361.7

 

16,367.8

 

17,902.0

 


Total gross debt as of December 31, 2006 after hedging was 52.6% fixed-rate and 47.4% floating-rate, including 10.8% at capped floating rates. As of December 31, 2006, all U.S. dollar and euro caps in the notional amount of €1,780  million were in the money.


Sensitivity of finance costs:

The Group manages its exposure to interest rate fluctuations based on floating-rate debt net of cash.

The breakdown of the Group’s floating-rate debt by maturity is as follows:

(€ millions)

Overnight and less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total

Total assets (cash and cash equivalents)

2,658.0

-

-

2,658.0

Total floating-rate liabilities

(3,360.1)

(1,872.2)

(809.9)

(6,042.3)

Net position before hedging

(702.1)

(1,872.2)

(809.9)

(3,384.3)

Derivative instruments (*)

180.4

1,243.0

(1,814.7)

(391.3)

Net position after active management and hedging

(521.7)

(629.2)

(2,624.7)

(3,775.6)

Caps not activated (**)

 

72.8

10.1

82.9

Total  

(521.7)

(556.4)

(2,614.6)

(3,692.7)

(*)Hedging financial instruments excluding caps which are out of the money.

(**)

Mainly CZK caps out of the money as of December 31, 2006

Floating-rate debt maturing within less than one year is to a large extent hedged by excess cash balances invested at short-term rates. Floating-rate net debt is therefore €3,775.6 million (euro-equivalent), that is 25.7% . As such, 74.3% of net debt is at fixed rates, including 12.1% at capped floating rates. These caps are activated as of December 31, 2006 and, as such, are considered fixed rates.

Assuming a constant net debt policy, a 0.25% increase in interest rates would generate an increase in annual finance costs, excluding market impacts, of €9.4 million.

In 2005, assuming a constant net debt policy, a 0.25% increase in interest rates would generate an increase in annual finance costs, excluding market impacts, of €12 million.


Hedge derivatives:


Derivative instrumentsswaps may be classified as fair value hedges or cash flow hedges. An interest rate fair value hedge changes fixed-rate financial assets or liabilities into floating rate financial assets or liabilities in order to protect against changes in their fair value. A cash flow hedge protects against changes in the value of cash flows associated with assets or liabilities.

The hedging relationship is clearly definedfollowing table shows the interest-rate exposure of gross debt (defined as the sum of non-current borrowings, current borrowings and documented on inception.

The effectiveness of the hedging relationship is demonstrated on inceptionbank overdrafts and throughout its term.other cash position items) before and after hedging.




Back to contents
 

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31,2007

(€ million)

Out-
standings

% total
debt

Out-
standings

% total
debt

Out-
standings

% total
debt

Fixed rate

15,971.5

77.0%

14,055.2

69.0%

12,129.7

66.5%

Floating rate

4,770.6

23.0%

6,322.6

31.0%

6,111.0

33.5%

Gross debt before hedging

20,742.1

100.0%

20,377.8

100.0%

18,240.7

100.0%

Fixed rate

10,808.8

51.3%

9,960.8

48.0%

9,759.2

53.6%

Capped floating rate (active caps)

0.0

0.0%

36.0

0.2%

1,401.7

7.7%

Floating rate

10,276.5

48.7%

10,752.5

51.8%

7,052.1

38.7%

Gross debt after hedging and fair value remeasurement of fixed-rate debt

21,085.3

100.0%

20,749.3

100.0%

18,213.0

100.0%

Fair value adjustments to (asset)/liability hedging derivatives

(343.2)

 

(371.5)

 

27.7

 

Gross debt at amortized cost

20,742.1

 

20,377.8

 

18,240.7

 





F-94

a-1


Interest rate fair value hedgesBack to Contents


The risk of volatility in the value ofTotal gross debt is hedged by fixed-rate receiver/floating-rate payer swaps which change bond issues to floating-rate debt (see Note 19).

Fair value hedging swaps represent notional outstandings of €3,308.3 million as of December 31, 2006, with a net fair value of €28.8 million in the balance sheet as follows:


Floating-rate payer / fixed-rate receiver swaps

Notional contract amount by maturity

Fair value of derivative instruments

(€ millions)

Total

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

As of December 31, 2006

3,308.3

49.5

499.7

2,759.1

45.2

16.3

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

2,587.6

35.2

707.3

1,845.0

164.7

2.5

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

4,625.7

740.7

1,872.9

2,012.1

286.0*

-

* including €2 million of derivative instruments at fair value in the Divisions.


The increase in the fair value2009 after hedging portfolio is due to:

·

the cancellation of the €200 million swap hedging the EMTN issue maturing June 2008.

·

the designation of swaps of €600 million as hedging the EMTN Series 7 issue, maturing February 2012

·

the hedging of the EMTN Series 17 issue, maturing February 2016, in the amount of €250 million;

·

the partial hedging (€100 million) of the EMTN Series 18 issue, maturing December 2020.


a-2

Cash flow hedges


Cash flow hedges comprise floating–rate receiverwas 51.3% fixed-rate payer swaps and purchases of48.7% floating-rate. No caps which fix the interest payable on floating-rate debt, mainly secured to finance BOT (Build Operate Transfer) contracts.


Floating-rate payer / fixed-rate receiver swaps / purchases of caps

Notional contract amount by maturity

Fair value of derivative instruments

(€ millions)

Total

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

As of December 31, 2006

1,476.5

94.6

1,072.2

309.7

6.8

48.4

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

792.0

251.2

241.9

298.9

-

88.6

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

682.7

32.7

428.4

221.6

0.5

82.4

€23.1 million, net of tax, was recorded directly in equity (fair value reserves) in respect of these derivative instrumentswere active as of December 31, 2006.

The increase in2009. Excluding inactive caps, the cash-flow hedging portfolio is due to:

·

fixed-rate portion of gross debt was 57.1% and the implementation of a €600 million hedge, maturing in 2009, to cover the Berlin contract acquisition debt carried by Veolia Berliner Wasser Beteiligungs AG (‘RVB’)

·

the hedging of the EMTN Series 20 issue, maturing February 2008, in the amount of €300 million;

·

the implementation of a hedge of €47 million in respect of the Bucharest water contract carried by Apa Nova Bucuresti.





Back to contents



a-3

Interest rate derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting


A certain number of derivative instruments used in the Veolia Environnement Group management policy do not qualify as hedges under IAS 32 and 39. The Group does not, however, consider these transactions to be of a speculative nature and views them as necessary to the effective management of its exposure.


(€ millions)

Notional amounts as of December 31, 2006

Fair value of derivative instruments

 

Total

Less than  1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

Fixed-rate receiver / floating-rate payer swaps

336.8

-

8.1

328.7

-

1.0

Floating-rate receiver / fixed-rate payer swaps

281.3

239.3

-

42.0

0.6

0.8

Floating-rate receiver / floating-rate payer swaps

803.2

652.0

1.2

150.0

0.8

8.8

Total firm financial instruments

1,421.3

891.3

9.3

520.7

1.4

10.6

Purchases of caps

2,263.7

700.0

753.6

810.1

27.5

-

Sales of caps (*)

772.8

700.0

72.8

-

-

-

Sales of swaptions

200.0

-

-

200.0

-

2.1

Total optional financial instruments

3,236.5

1,400.0

826.4

1,010.1

27.5

2.1

Total derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

4,657.8

2,291.3

835.7

1,530.8

28.9

12.7

(*)

Sales of caps are backed in the amount of €700 million by purchases of caps with the same exercise price and maturity and do not therefore impact net income.


(€ millions)

Notional amounts as of
December 31,2005 adjusted

Fair value of derivative instruments

 

Total

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

Fixed-rate receiver / floating-rate payer swaps

752.8

-

2.1

750.7

6.4

0.5

Floating-rate receiver / fixed-rate payer swaps

298.2

-

259.7

38.5

-

4.5

Floating-rate receiver / floating-rate payer swaps

866.0

211.9

654.1

-

0.4

-

Currency swaps

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total firm financial instruments

1,917.0

211.9

915.9

789.2

6.8

5.0

Purchases of caps

2,533.3

-

1,321.1

1,212.2

24.2

1.7

Sales of caps (*)

769.0

-

769.0

-

-

-

Sales of swaptions

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total optional financial instruments

3,302.3

-

2,090.1

1,212.2

24.2

1.7

Total derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

5,219.3

211.9

3,006.0

2,001.4

31.0

6.7

(*)

Sales of caps are backed in the amount of €700 million by purchases of caps with the same exercise price and maturity and do not therefore impact net income.


(€ millions)

Notional amounts as of
December 31,2004 adjusted

Fair value of derivative instruments

 

Total

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

Fixed-rate receiver / floating-rate payer swaps

139.6

-

-

139.6

5.5

-

Floating-rate receiver / fixed-rate payer swaps

1,257.1

-

867.8

389.3

4.9

69.3

Floating-rate receiver / floating-rate payer swaps

342.8

154.5

188.3

-

0.1

1.7

Currency swaps

190.4

-

190.4

-

24.1

0.2

Total firm financial instruments

1,929.9

154.5

1,246.5

528.9

34.6

71.2

Purchases of caps

2,005.3

161.4

950.2

893.7

16.9

-

Sales of caps (*)

765.7

-

765.7

-

-

0.3

Sales of swaptions

183.5

-

183.5

-

-

5.8

Total optional financial instruments

2,954.5

161.4

1,899.4

893.7

16.9

6.1

Total derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

4,884.4

315.9

3,145.9

1,422.6

51.5

77.3

(*)

Sales of caps are backed in the amount of €700 million by purchases of caps with the same exercise price and maturity and do not therefore impact net income.


Sensitivity of finance costs:




Back to contents



The portfolio of interest rate derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting generates a certain volatility in net financial income.floating-rate portion was 42.9%.

As of December 31, 2006,2009, the Group has cash and cash equivalents of €5,614.4 million, the majority of which bears interest at floating rates.

Net debt totals €15,127.7 million and is 69.2% fixed-rate and 30.8% floating-rate.

Sensitivity of the consolidated income statement and equity:

The Group manages its exposure to interest rate fluctuations based on floating-rate gross debt net of cash.

The breakdown of the Group’s floating-rate debt by maturity as of December 31, 2009 is as follows:

(€ million)

Overnight and
less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than
5 years

Total

Total assets (cash and cash equivalents)

5,614.4

 

 

5,614.4

Total floating-rate liabilities

(3,438.0)

(855.5)

(477.1)

(4,770.6)

Net floating-rate position before hedging

2,176.4

(855.5)

(477.1)

843.8

Derivative instruments(1)

4.2

(2,159.0)

(3,351.1)

(5,505.9)

Net floating-rate position after active management and hedging

2,180.6

(3,014.5)

(3,828.2)

(4,662.1)


(1) Debt hedging financial instruments excluding inactive caps of U.S.$400 million and €952 million.


The analysis of the sensitivity of finance costs to interest rate risk covers financial assets and liabilities and the non-hedgingderivative portfolio toas of December 31, 2009. Given the net debt structure of the Group and its derivative portfolio, a change in interest rates iswould impact the income statement via the cost of floating-rate debt (after hedging), the fair value of trading derivatives and Group investments.

The analysis of the sensitivity of equity to interest rate risk concerns the cash flow hedge reserve. This sensitivity corresponds to fair market value movements as follows:a result of an instantaneous change in interest rates.

·

Assuming a 0.25%constant net debt structure and management policy, an increase in interest rates of 0.5% at the interest ratebalance sheet date would increase the market value of the non-hedging portfolio by €2.6 million, offsetting thegenerate an increase in the finance cost;

·

equity of €25 million (before tax) and a 0.25% decrease in net income (before tax) of €15 million. A decrease in interest rates of 0.5% would have the interest rate would decreaseopposite impact on net income and equity. All other variables have been assumed to be constant for the valuepurpose of this portfolio by €2.9 million, off settinganalysis and the improvement of finance cost.change in net income and equity is attributable to the variation in interest rates, all other things being equal.

29.1.2


(b)

Management of Foreign Exchange Riskforeign exchange risk

The Group’s international activities performed in nearly 65 countries, generate significant foreign currency flows. The Group is mainly exposed to foreign exchange risk on its balance sheet “assets” position. The Group’s trading activities do not expose it to significant exchange rate risk.

The Group’s central treasury department manages foreign exchange risk centrally within limits set by the Chief FinancialFinance Officer. The Group uses derivative instruments to hedge its

Overall exposure to foreign exchange risk (currency swaps, cross currency swaps, currency options,and risk management

Foreign exchange risk, as defined in accordance with IFRS 7, mainly results from:

(a)

foreign currency-denominated purchases and sales of goods and services relating to operating activities and the related hedges (e.g. currency forwards). The fair valueHowever, these transactions remain minor within the Group (see Note 29.1.2.1);

(b)

foreign currency-denominated financial assets and liabilities, including foreign currency-denominated loans/borrowings and related hedges (e.g. forex swaps) (see Note 29.1.2.2);

(c)

investments in foreign subsidiaries realized through the translation of foreign exchange derivatives recognized inaccounts impacting the balance sheet breaks down as follows:translation reserves (see Note 29.1.2.3).



F-95


(€ millions)

Note

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

 

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Foreign exchange derivatives

 

56.5

42.7

18.0

31.5

82.3

30.1

Net investment hedge

b-1

42.0

4.3

13.9

0.3

71.9

-

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

b-2

14.5

4.1

4.1

13.2

10.4

10.1

Embedded derivatives

b-3

-

34.3

-

18.0

-

20.0



Back to Contents


Management of foreign exchange transaction risk:

OneThe Group has no significant exposure to foreign exchange transaction risk. The activities of the specific characteristics of environmental servicesGroup are performed by subsidiaries operating in their own country and their own currency. Exposure to foreign exchange risk is that they bear little transaction risk. Income and expenses are mainly denominated in the currency of the country where the Group operates.  However, optional hedges may be negotiated with the front office when responding to a call for tenders, prior to obtaining the definitive contract.therefore naturally limited.


Management of foreign exchange asset risk:

Financing is secured in the local currency for operations located in foreign countries. In the case of inter-company financing, these credit lines can generate foreign exchange risk. In order to limit the impact of this risk, Veolia Environnement has developed a policy which seeks to back foreign-currency financing and foreign-currencyforeign currency derivatives with inter-company receivables denominated in the same currency.


The asset exposure hedging strategy primarily involves hedging certain net foreign investments and ensuring that Group companies do not have a material balance sheet foreign exchange position that could generate significant volatility in foreign exchange gains and losses and hedging(IAS 21 / IAS 39).

29.1.2.1.

Translation risk

Considering its international presence, the translation of the income statements of the Group’s foreign subsidiaries is sensitive to exchange rate fluctuations.

The following table summarizes the sensitivity of certain net foreign investments (IAS 21/IAS 39), and notably inter-company loans designated as loans and receivables forming part ofGroup consolidated income statement aggregates to a net investment.


b-1

Hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation


Financial instruments designated as net investment hedges break down as follows:


(€ millions)

Notional amount as ofDecember 31, 2006
by currency and maturity

Fair value of derivative instruments

Financial instrument

Currency

Amount

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

Currency receiver swaps

HKD

JPY

MXN

PLN

SKK

55.9

14.5

1.4

78.3

112.7

55.9

14.5

1.4

78.3

112.7

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

2.1

0.1

-

0.8

0.1

-

-

0.0

-

4.3

Embedded derivatives
(forward sale)

KRW

82.5

15.9

52.8

13.8

2.7

-

Cross currency swaps: floating rate receiver/floating rate payer

USD

299.1

-

299.1

-

36.2

-

Total currency derivatives

 

644.3

278.6

351.8

13.8

42.1

4.3

USPP borrowings

USD

285.1

-

-

285.1

n/a

n/a

Syndicated loan

CZK

203.9

-

203.9

-

n/a

n/a

Total financing

 

489.0

-

203.9

285.1

n/a

n/a





Back to contents




(€ millions)

Notional amount as of December 31, 2005
by currency and maturity

Fair value of derivative instruments

Financial instrument

       
 

Currency

Amount

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

Currency receiver swaps

NOK

HKD

PLN

86.1

13.3

76.8

86.1

13.3

76.8

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.9

-

0.2

-

0.3

-

Embedded derivatives (forward sale)

KRW

100.3

17.8

57.3

25.2

5.2

-

Cross currency swaps: floating rate receiver/floating rate payer

HKD

USD

44.8

299.0

44.8

-

-

299.0

-

-

1.0

5.5

-

-

Total currency derivatives

 

620.3

238.8

356.3

25.2

13.8

0.3

USPP borrowings

USD

302.6

-

-

302.6

n/a

n/a

Syndicated loan

CZK

211.6

-

211.6

-

n/a

n/a

Total financing

 

514.2

-

211.6

302.6

n/a

n/a



(€ millions)

Notional amount as of December 31, 2004,
by currency and maturity

Fair value of derivative instruments

Financial instrument

Currency

Amount

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

Embedded derivatives (forward sale)

KRW

116.8

16.5

62.6

37.7

20.3

-

Cross currency swaps: floating rate receiver/floating rate payer

HKD

USD

44.8

299.0

-

-

44.8

299.0

-

-

6.9

44.7

-

-

Total currency derivatives

 

460.6

16.5

406.4

37.7

71.9

-

USPP borrowings

USD

262.0

-

-

262.0

n/a

n/a

Syndicated loan

CZK

216.6

-

216.6

-

n/a

n/a

Total financing

 

478.6

-

216.6

262.0

n/a

n/a


Inter-company loans and receivables forming part of a foreign investment (IAS 21) are nearly systematically hedged by foreign currency external financing10% increase or currency derivatives (cross currency swaps, currency forwards) meeting IAS 39 criteria for hedge accounting. Foreign exchange gains and losses recordeddecrease in foreign exchange rates against the euro, with regard to the translation reserves in respect of hedging instruments are systematically offset byfinancial statements of foreign subsidiaries.

 

Contribution to the consolidated financial statements

Sensitivity to an increase or decrease in the main currencies against the euro

(€ million)

EUR

GBP

USD

PLN

CZK

Other currencies

Total

+10%

-10%

Revenue

20,677.4

2,259.3

2,977.4

502.3

1,150.6

6,984.0

34,551.0

(626.3)

689.0

Operating income

1,046.8

330.4

147.8

46.0

173.3

276.9

2,021.2

(63.4)

69.7


29.1.2.2.

Foreign exchange gains and losses recognized in foreign exchange translation reserves on loans forming part ofrisk with regard to the net investment, unless:
finance cost

-With many offices worldwide, Veolia organizes financing in local currencies.

The foreign currency debts borne by the inter-company loan forming part ofparent company, Veolia Environnement SA, are generally hedged using either derivative instruments or assets in the net investment in a foreign operation is not hedged;same currency.

-

The following table shows the hedge is ineffective dueexposure to a difference between the nominal amount of the hedge and the amount of the hedged net asset;

-

only the net assetsexchange rate fluctuations of the foreign subsidiary (excluding the loan forming partcurrency net financial debt of the net investment) are hedged.


Netentities that bear the main foreign exchange losses recorded in foreign exchange translation reserves asrisks. It also presents the sensitivity of December 31, 2006 of €42.8 million comprise:

-

foreign exchange losses of €11 million on an unhedged U.S. dollar inter-company loan forming part ofthese entities to a net investment (IAS 21), capitalized in December 2004;

-

the impact of exchange rate fluctuations for an amount of €25 million coming from investment hedges10% increase or decrease in the Water Division inparities of the Czech Republic (€21 million) and Slovakia (€4 million);corresponding foreign currencies.

-

the impact of exchange rate fluctuations for an amount of €3 million coming from investment hedges in the Dalkia Division in Poland.

 

Net finance cost
Foreign currency exposure
(in millions of local currency)

 

Sensitivity to an increase or decrease in the 4 main currencies against the euro
(€ million)

 

GBP

USD

PLN

CZK

Other currencies
(in euros)

Total translated into euros

+10%

-10%

Veolia Environnement SA

(37.4)

(86.0)

(54.7)

(313.1)

(356.3)

(473.9)

(15.3)

9.8

Other Group subsidiaries

(21.8)

(96.6)

(51.5)

(13.2)

(199.2)

(310.4)

(11.8)

9.7

Total in foreign currency

(59.2)

(182.7)

(106.2)

(326.3)

(555.5)

(784.3)

  

Total translated into euros

(66.2)

(125.8)

(24.5)

(12.3)

(555.5)

(784.3)

(27.1)

19.5




F-96



Back to contentsContents



b-229.1.2.3.

HedgingForeign exchange and translation risk in the consolidated statement of balance sheetfinancial position

Due to its international presence, the Group’s consolidated statement of financial position is exposed to exchange rate fluctuations. A fluctuation in the euro impacts the translation of subsidiary foreign exchange exposure by derivatives not qualifying for hedge accountingcurrency-denominated assets in the consolidated statement of financial position. The main currencies used are the US dollar and the pound sterling.


Each month,For its most significant assets, the Group determines its foreign exchange position and enters into hedging transactions once it has quantified its foreign exchange exposure and notablyissued debt in the overall foreign exchange position. Currency derivatives hedging the overall balance sheet foreign exchange position are accounted for as trading transactions, with fair value movements recognized directly in net income.


The portfolio of currency derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting comprises currency forwards and currency options with a maturity of less than two years:


Notional

As of December 31, 2006

(€ millions)

Total

USD

GBP

AUD

CAD

CHF

CZK

PLN

NOK

SEK

Other

Forward purchases

37.0

23.5

-

0.7

-

-

-

-

-

4.2

8.6

Forward sales

51.7

19.4

-

10.2

-

-

-

-

4.2

-

17.9

Total currency forwards

88.7

42.9

-

10.9

-

-

-

-

4.2

4.2

26.5

Currency receiver swaps

145.3

-

-

2.8

-

4.9

135.7

-

1.0

0.9

 

Currency payer swaps

2,460.0

730.4

1,092.5

147.8

25.7

33.1

3.5

87.4

132.3

98.2

109.1

Total currency swaps

2,605.3

730.4

1,092.5

150.6

25.7

38.0

139.2

87.4

133.3

99.2

109.1

Put options

10.6

10.6

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total currency options

10.6

10.6

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-



Notional

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

 

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

(€ millions)

Total

USD

GBP

PLN

NOK

SEK

Other

 

Total

USD

GBP

PLN

NOK

SEK

Other

Forward purchases

39.7

15.9

13.1

-

-

-

10.7

 

54.9

25.6

24.2

-

-

-

5.1

Forward sales

48.8

34.9

1.8

-

-

-

12.1

 

24.1

5.1

14.9

-

-

-

4.1

Total currency forwards

88.5

50.8

14.9

-

-

-

22.8

 

79.0

30.7

39.1

-

-

-

9.2

Currency receiver swaps

98.7

12.1

0.6

1.3

0.8

1.1

82.8

 

114.0

9.6

21.9

-

-

1.4

81.1

Currency payer swaps

1,428.1

317.9

602.1

168.4

46.8

91.3

201.6

 

1,529.2

587.0

430.2

134.6

118.0

98.2

161.2

Total currency swaps

1,526.8

330.0

602.7

169.7

47.6

92.4

284.4

 

1,643.2

596.6

452.1

134.6

118.0

99.6

242.3

Call options

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

 

3.2

3.2

-

-

-

-

-

Put options

3.6

3.6

-

-

-

-

-

 

4.0

4.0

-

-

-

-

-

Total currency options

3.6

3.6

-

-

-

-

-

 

7.2

7.2

-

-

-

-

-





Back to contents






Fair value

As of December 31, 2006

(€ millions)

Total

USD

GBP

AUD

CAD

CHF

CZK

PLN

NOK

SEK

Other

Forward purchases

(1.5)

(1.6)

       

0.1

 

Currency receiver swaps

0.7

     

0.7

    

Total currency swaps and forward purchases

(0.8)

(1.6)

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.7

0.0

0.0

0.1

0.0

Forward sales

0.6

0.3

        

0.3

Currency payer swaps

10.5

8.5

0.7

(1.1)

1.5

0.8

 

(0.3)

0.5

  

Total currency swaps and forward sales

11.2

8.8

0.7

(1.1)

1.5

0.8

0.0

(0.3)

0.5

0.0

0.3

Put options

-

-

         

Total currency options

-

-

         

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting (*)

10.4

7.2

0.7

(1.1)

1.5

0.8

0.7

(0.3)

0.5

0.1

0.3


Fair value

As of December 31, 2005

 

As of December 31, 2004

(€ millions)

Total

USD

GBP

PLN

NOK

SEK

Other

 

Total

USD

GBP

PLN

NOK

SEK

Other

Forward purchases

(1.8)

(1.6)

-

-

-

-

(0.2)

 

(3.4)

(3.1)

-

-

-

-

(0.3)

Currency receiver swaps

(0.3)

0.4

-

-

-

-

(0.7)

 

(0.6)

(1.0)

(0.3)

-

-

-

0.7

Total currency swaps and forward purchases

(2.1)

(1.2)

-

-

-

-

(0.9)

 

(4.0)

(4.1)

(0.3)

-

-

-

0.4

Forward sales

(1.6)

(1.4)

-

-

-

-

(0.2)

 

-

0.5

(0.5)

-

-

-

-

Currency payer swaps

(5.4)

(5.3)

1.5

-

(0.1)      

(0.1)

(1.4)     

 

4.3

2.0

1.5

(3.3)

2.0

0.7

1.4

Total currency swaps and forward sales

(7.0)

(6.7)

1.5

-

(0.1)      

(0.1)

(1.6)     

 

4.3

2.5

1.0

(3.3)

2.0

0.7

1.4

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting (*)

(9.1)

(7.9)

1.5

-

(0.1)      

(0.1)

(2.5)      

 

0.3

(1.6)

0.7

(3.3)

2.0

0.7

1.8

(*) Net fair value (Assets–Liabilities) excluding embedded derivatives





Back to contents



The above portfolio of currency derivatives was mainly contracted by Veolia Environnement SA (holding company) to hedge its foreign currency-denominated net debt (comprising foreign currency borrowings and foreign currency-denominated inter-company loans and borrowings), to reduce the sensitivity of foreign currency-denominated debt, net of cash and cash equivalents, to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates.


relevant currencies.

The following table presents a break down ofshows the foreign exchange exposurenet asset amounts for the main currencies, defined as of December 31, 2006 of Veolia Environnement SA’s foreign currency-denominated debt,the asset amount excluding net of cash and cash equivalents, taking into account currency derivatives:  
financial debt.

 

VE SA foreign currency-denominated net debt

Open position in € million*

Impact of a 10% change in exchange rates against the euro

GBP

7.8

11.6

1.1

PLN

9.5

2.5

0.2

USD

31.0

23.5

2.1

CHF

4.3

2.7

0.2

CAD

2.3

1.5

0.1

Other (€ million equivalent)

 

19.1

1.7

Total

n/a

60.9

5.5

 

Contribution to the consolidated financial statements

Sensitivity to an increase or decrease in the 2 main currencies against the euro

(€ million)

EUR

USD

GBP

Other currencies

Total

+10%

-10%

Assets excluding net financial debt by currency

13,044

2,710

2,646

6,859

25,259

595

(487)

Net financial debt by currency

8,506

1,595

1,857

3,170

15,128

384

(314)

Net assets by currency

4,538

1,115

789

3,689

10,131

211

(173)


* Accounting position29.1.3


The above table shows that a 10% increase in all foreign currencies against the euro would generate foreign exchange gains of €5.5 million.


b-3

Embedded derivatives


The Korean embedded derivatives concern Water treatment contracts with Korean industrial customers. The contracts feature clauses indexing revenue to the U.S. dollar or the euro, while the operating expenses are in Korean won.


(c)

Management of commodity risk


c-1

Fuel and electricity risks


Fuel or electricity prices can be subject to significant fluctuations. Nonetheless, Veolia Environnement'sEnvironnement’s activities have not been materially affected and should not be materially affected in the future by the cost increases or the availability of fuel or other commodities, as thecommodities. The long-term contracts entered into by Veolia Environnement generally include price review and/or indexation clauses which enable it to pass on the majority of any increases in commodity or fuel prices to the price of services sold to customers, even if this may be performed with a time delay.

AsNonetheless, as part of supply management and cost optimization, certain Group’s structuresGroup subsidiaries may be required, depending on their activities, to contract forward purchases or sales of electricity or heavy fuelcommodities and diesel swapsset-up derivatives to fix the cost of refined petroleumcommodities supply, where the contracts do not offer adapted protection.

29.1.3.1.

Fuel risks

In the Transportation Division, a “fuel” hedging policy has been implemented in order to control trends in fuel prices. The Group uses firm fuel purchase contracts (deemed for its own use) or derivatives whose characteristics (notional amount, maturity) are defined in line with forecast fuel requirements (based on firm orders or highly probably forecast flows). The majority of these derivatives are swaps used to determine the forward purchase price of fuel.

These derivatives were analyzed in accordance with IAS 39 and classified as hedging instruments (cash flow hedges) (see Note 28).

29.1.3.2.

Coal, gas and electricity risks

The Group has entered into long-term gas, coal, electricity and biomass purchase contracts in order to secure its supplies.

The accounting treatmentmajority of suchthese commitments are reciprocal; the third parties concerned are obliged to deliver the quantities indicated in these contracts and the Group is describedobliged to take them.

These contracts are considered to fall outside the scope of IAS 39, except for specific transactions in Notes 1.14Germany, where electricity purchase options and 1.23.

Assales commitments have been contracted in parallel. These transactions are not eligible for hedging within the meaning of December 31, 2006, the fair value of related derivative instruments totaled €64.2 million in assets and €25.8 million in liabilities and did not qualify for hedge accounting. Transactions mainly concern options to purchase electricity held by the company carrying the Braunschweig contract and covering the period 2007 to 2025 of €55.8 million, basedIAS 39 (see Note 36 on period-end valuation assumptions and commitments to sell electricity covering the period 2007 to 2011 of €23.8 million, based on the same valuation assumptions.  off-balance sheet commitments).

Contract notional amounts are as follows:


(€ millions)

Notional contract amount by maturity

Total

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Electricity purchase options

in Gwh

16,511

886

3,501

12,124

in € million

717.0

37.5

150.3

529.2

Electricity sale commitments

in Gwh

3,811

876

2,935

 

in € million

184.4

39.3

145.1

 





F-97



Back to contentsContents



c-2

Greenhouse gas emission rights


Other transactions not qualifying for hedge accounting relate to contracts swapping greenhouse gas emission rights for Carbon Emission certificates, maturing at the end of 2007, for 2 million metric tons. These swaps are recorded in balance sheet assets for a net carrying amount of €7.2 million.


(d)29.2

Management of equity risk


As of December 31, 2006,2009, Veolia Environnement held 15,254,30814,731,592 of its own shares, of which 8,591,656 were allocated to external growth operations and 6,139,936 were acquired for allocation to employees under stock option and employee savings plans, with a market value of €890.9€340.7 million, based on a share price of €23.125 and a net carrying amount of €479.7€452.6 million deducted from equity.


As part of its cash management strategy, Veolia Environnement holds UCITS shares. These UCITS have the characteristics of monetary UCITS and are not subject to equity risk.


(e)29.3

Management of liquidity risk

The operational management of liquidity and financing is managed by the Treasury and Financing Department. This management involves the centralization of major financing in order to optimize liquidity and cash.

The Group secures financing on international bond markets, international private placement markets, the treasury note market and the bank lending market, (see Note 17 “Non-current and current borrowings”).



F-98



Back to Contents


29.3.1

Maturity of financial liabilities

Undiscounted contractual flows of financial liabilities, comprising principal payments and interest flows, are presented below. Market data used are valid as of December 31, 2009:

 

As of December 31, 2009

Maturing in

(€ million)

Net carrying amount

Total contractual flows(1)

Less than
1 year

2 years

3 to
5 years

More than
5 years

Non-current borrowings

17,647.3

17,422.7

 

773.4

5,468.1

11,181.2

o/w bond issues – publicly offered

12,511.8

12,304.1

 

-

3,735.9

8,568.2

o/w bond issues – private placements

299.1

288.7

  

142.9

145.8

Current borrowings

2,983.1

2,983.1

2,983.1

   

Trade payables

5,311.0

5,311.0

5,311.0

   

Other current operating payables

4,933.4

4,933.4

4,933.4

   

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

454.9

454.9

454.9

   

Interest on non-current and current borrowings(2)

  

851.8

823.0

1,952.9

4,019.3

Derivative instruments – Liabilities

224.1

     

o/w interest rate derivatives

76.6

751.6

57.0

57.2

158.1

479.3

Fair value hedges

8.3

85.5

10.9

10.9

30.0

33.7

Cash flow hedges

59.6

640.8

46.0

42.1

118.8

433.9

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

8.7

25.3

0.1

4.2

9.3

11.7

o/w foreign currency derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

86.8

88.0

68.0

0.1

1.4

18.5

Inflows

 

(2,761.8)

(2,755.3)

(1.1)

(5.4)

0.0

Outflows

 

2,849.8

2,823.3

1.2

6.8

18.5

o/w foreign currency derivatives hedging a net investment

17.1

17.1

1.6

  

15.5

Inflows

 

(276.4)

(272.5)

(3.9)

  

Outflows

 

293.5

274.1

3.9

 

15.5

o/w commodity derivatives

43.6

     

Sub-total debts and liabilities

  

14,660.8

1,653.7

7,580.5

15,713.8

Derivative instruments – Assets

(477.5)

     

o/w interest rate derivatives

(355.0)

(1,173.6)

(180.8)

(180.7)

(458.4)

(353.7)

Fair value hedges

(351.5)

(1163.0)

(178.3)

(178.3)

(453.3)

(353.1)

Cash flow hedges

(0.1)

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

(3.5)

(10.6)

(2.5)

(2.4)

(5.1)

(0.6)

o/w foreign currency derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

(45.5)

(42.8)

(26.5)

(3.4)

(8.9)

(4.0)

Inflows

 

(1,182.4)

(995.4)

(53.3)

(102.9)

(30.8)

Outflows

 

1,139.6

968.9

49.9

94.0

26.8

o/w foreign currency derivatives hedging a net investment

(13.1)

(13.1)

(3.0)

  

(10.1)

Inflows

 

(185.1)

(175.0)

  

(10.1)

Outflows

 

172.0

172.0

   

o/w commodity derivatives

(63.9)

     

Sub-total assets

  

(210.3)

(184.1)

(467.3)

(367.8)

Total

  

14,450.5

1,469.6

7,113.2

15,346.0

(1)

debts are presented at the year-end exchange rate

(2)

floating-rate interest is calculated at the year-end interest rate


The average maturity of financial debt is 10 years.



F-99



Back to Contents


29.3.2

Net liquid asset positions

Net liquid assets of the Group as of December 31, 2009 break down as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31,2008

As of
December 31,2007

Veolia Environnement:

   

Undrawn MT syndicated loans *

3,694.6

2,890.3

4,000.0

Undrawn MT credit lines

400.0

575.0

850.0

Undrawn ST credit lines

575.0

350.0

175.0

Cash & cash equivalents

4,091.2

2,283.6

1,550.8

Subsidiaries:

  

 

Cash & cash equivalents

1,523.2

1,566.0

1,564.8

Total liquid assets

10,284.0

7,664.9

8,140.6

Current debts and bank overdrafts and other cash position items

  

 

Current debts

2,983.1

3,219.7

3,805.0

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

454.9

465.7

459.4

Total current debts and bank overdrafts and other cash position items

3,438.0

3,685.4

4,264.4

Total liquid assets net of current debts and bank overdrafts and cash position items

6,846.0

3,979.5

3,876.2


* maturing April 20, 2012.


As of December 31, 2009, Veolia Environnement had total liquid assets of €10.3 billion, including cash and cash equivalents of €5.6 billion.

As of December 31, 2009, cash equivalents were primarily held by Veolia Environnement SA in the amount of €4,049.8 million including non-dynamic monetary UCITS of €3,037.9 million, negotiable debt instruments (bank certificates of deposit and treasury notes with a maturity of less than three months) of €375.2 million, monetary notes of €385.0 million and term deposits of €250.0 million.

Undrawn credit lines as of December 31, 2009 are as follows:

Bank

Amount in € million

Maturity

NATIXIS

150

March 31, 2012

BNP Paribas

150

March 2, 2012

HSBC

100

June 30, 2011

RBS formerly ABN

100

December 29, 2010

SG

150

December 23, 2010

ABN Amro

125

December 20, 2010

CIC and BFCM

100

November 15, 2010

Calyon

100

March 4, 2010

Total

975


The €150 million credit line with BNP Paribas which matured on March 3, 2009 was renewed in the same amount, with a new maturity of March 2, 2012.

The €200 million credit line with Natixis which matured on February 9, 2009 was renewed in the amount of €150 million, with a new maturity of March 31, 2012.

A new credit line of €100 million was negotiated with HSBC, with a maturity of June 30, 2011.

Veolia Environnement may draw on the multi-currency syndicated credit facility and all credit lines at any time.



F-100



Back to Contents


29.3.3

Rating

As of December 31, 2009, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s rated Veolia Environnement SA as follows:

Short-term

Long-term

Outlook

Recent events

Moody’s

P-2

A3

Negative

On March 26, 2009, Moody’s confirmed the ratings assigned to Veolia Environnement on June 27, 2005, but downgraded the outlook from stable to negative.

Standard and Poor’s

A-2

BBB+

Negative

On March 25, 2009, Standard and Poor’s confirmed the ratings assigned to Veolia Environnement on October 3, 2005, but downgraded the outlook from stable to negative. On January 4, 2010, these ratings were confirmed by Standard and Poor’s.


29.3.4

Information on early debt repayment clauses

Debt of Veolia Environnement SA:

Bank financing:

The legal documentation for syndicated loans (particularly the syndicated loan of €4 billion) and bilateral credit lines contracted by Veolia Environnement SA does not contain any financial covenants, i.e. obligations to comply with a debt payout ratio or interest ratio or a minimum credit rating which, in the event of non-compliance, could lead to the early repayment of the relevant financing.

Bond financing:

The private placement performed in the United States in 2003 (outstanding of €299.1 million as of December 31, 2009) is the only source of bond financing that contains financial covenants (debt hedging ratio < 5.3 and interest hedging ratio > 3.2). These covenants were complied with as of December 31, 2009

The legal documentation for the notes issued by the Company under its EMTN program (outstanding of €11.2 billion as of December 31, 2009) does not contain any financial covenants.

Debt of subsidiaries:

The project financing borne by specific companies or the financing granted by multilateral development banks to the Group’s subsidiaries may contain financial covenants.

As of December 31, 2009, the financing agreements containing such covenants and amounting to more than €100 million (Group share) were as follows:

Financing
(€ million)

Outstanding as of December 31, 2009

Type of covenant

Aquiris (Water Division - Belgium)

179.1

DPR1 and deadline for obtaining final acceptance for the plant

Delfluent (Water Division – Netherlands)

112.4

DPR, forecast DPR and duration of financing

Shenzhen (Water Division – China)

100.9

Minimum reserve account

Redal (Water Division - Morocco)

103.6

Working capital, equity/share capital and DPR


DPR (Debt Payout Ratio) = Net financial debt ratio/EBITDA for which the defined aggregates may vary according to the financing




F-101



Back to Contents


As of December 31, 2009, the Group complied with all the covenants included in the documentation of these significant financing agreements.

With regard to the Aquiris project (Brussels wastewater treatment plant), the lenders waived their right as of January 29, 2010 to demand early repayment of the financing until June 30, 2010. At the same time, a demand guarantee, exercisable as of June 30, 2010 and maturing on August 31, 2010, was granted by Veolia Eau-CGE to the lenders.

Financing for a project with an outstanding of €81 million as of December 31, 2009 contains a covenant that has yet to be complied with.

29.4

Management of credit risk

The Group is exposed to counterparty risk in various areas: its operating activities, cash investment activities and derivatives.

29.4.1

Counterparty risk relating to operating activities

Credit risk must be considered separately with respect to operating financial assets and operating receivables. Credit risk on operating financial assets is appraised via the rating of primarily public customers. Credit risk on other operating receivables is appraised through an analysis of risk dilution and late payments for private customers and exceptionally, for public customers, by a credit analysis.

Group customer credit risk analysis may be broken down into the following four categories (Public customers - Delegating authority, Private customers - Individuals, Public customers - Other and Private customers - Companies):

  

As of December 31, 2009

Breakdown by customer type

(€ million)

Note

Gross
carrying
amount

Provisions

Net carrying
amount

Public
customers -
Delegating
authority

Private
customers -
Individuals

Public
customers -
Other

Private
customers -
Companies

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,705.0

(53.2)

5,651.8

4,647.3

 

185.6

818.9

Trade receivables

13

9,641.6

(560.3)

9,081.3

2,202.8

1,685.8

1,672.9

3,519.8

Other current operating receivables

13

1,178.0

(76.8)

1,101.2

183.3

318.6

88.3

511.0

Other non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

774.8

(73.5)

701.3

59.0

4.1

19.3

618.9(1)

Current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

195.8

(31.9)

163.9

27.9

5.1

3.8

127.1

Loans and receivables

 

17,495.2

(795.7)

16,699.5

7,120.3

2,013.6

1,969.9

5,595.7

Other non-current financial assets

11

72.8

(20.2)

52.6

3.1

7.1

18.2

24.2

Other current financial assets

11

57.9

(4.1)

53.8

1.9

4.1

0.3

47.5

Total

 

17,625.9

(820.0)

16,805.9

7,125.3

2,024.8

1,988.4

5,667.4



1

Of which Dalkia International and its subsidiaries in the amount of €434.2 million as of December 31, 2008 and €390.8 million as of December 31, 2009.



F-102



Back to Contents


The analysis of Group customer credit risk as of December 31, 2008 is as follows:

  

As of December 31, 2008

Breakdown by customer type

(€ million)

Note

Gross
carrying
amount

Provisions

Net carrying
amount

Public
customers -
Delegating
authority

Private
customers -
Individuals

Public
customers -
Other

Private
customers -
Companies

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,763.8 

(12.6)

5,751.2 

4,834.9

-

54.0

862.3

Trade receivables

13

10,253.0 

(550.9)

9,702.1 

2,228.2

1,877.2

1,776.1

3,820.6

Other current operating receivables

13

1,314.1 

(59.6)

1,254.5 

244.3

312.9

153.1

544.2

Other non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

803.0 

(63.4) 

739.6 

59.9

21.8

28.9

629.0(1)

Current financial assets in loans and receivables

14

283.3 

(27.9) 

255.4 

29.4

4.7

28.6

192.7

Loans and receivables

 

18,417.2 

(714.4) 

17,702.8 

7,396.7

2,216.6

2,040.7

6,048.8

Other non-current financial assets

11

91.5 

(13.8) 

77.7 

23.3

8.1

17.6

28.7

Other current financial assets

14

70.2 

(4.2) 

66.0 

2.0

3.9

26.0

34.1


Given the nature of the Group’s activities and its customers, and notably the ongoing nature of its activities, the Group considers that credit risk is unlikely to have a material impact.



1

Of which Dalkia International and its subsidiaries in the amount of €434.2 million as of December 31, 2008 and €390.8 million as of December 31, 2009.



F-103



Back to Contents


Assets past due and not impaired break down as follows:

  

As of December 31, 2009

Assets past due but not impaired

  

Gross
carrying
amount

Provisions

Net carrying
amount

Assets not
yet due

(€ million)

Note

0-6
months

6 months -
1 year

More
than
1 year

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,705.0

(53.2)

5,651.8

5,623.7

13.7

7.4

7.0

Trade receivables

13

9,941.6

(560.3)

9,081.3

6,765.4

1,631.7

267.3

416.9

Other current operating receivables

13

1,178.0

(76.8)

1,101.2

747.2

87.3

171.3

95.4

Other non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

774.8

(73.5)

701.3

701.3

   

Current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

195.8

(31.9)

163.9

136.4

10.8

5.6

11.1

Loans and receivables

 

17,495.2

(795.7)

16,699.5

13,974.0

1,743.5

451.6

530.4

Other non-current financial assets

11

72.8

(20.2)

52.6

52.6

   

Other current financial assets

11

57.9

(4.1)

53.8

48.2

 

1.9

3.7


Assets past due over 6 months and not impaired (€987.6 million) mainly consist of trade receivables. They declined by 11.2% compared to fiscal 2008.

Payment delays in excess of 6 months are mainly concentrated in two countries where settlement periods are exceptionally long:

In Italy, the net “trade receivables” account for all Group subsidiaries is €247.2 million as of December 31, 2009, for receivables past due over 6 months. This period is due to settlement practices in this country. Furthermore, in Italy, trade receivables primarily consist of a multitude of user/private customers for which the credit risk is highly diluted and local authorities and state bodies for which the recovery period is long.

In Morocco, the net “trade receivables” account is €39.6 million as of December 31, 2009, compared to €73.3 million as of December 31, 2008, for receivables past due over 6 months. This decrease was mainly attributable to the change in consolidated method (from full to proportionate consolidation) for the Water division’s activity in North Africa and the Middle East.

Finally, in France, net trade receivables past due over 6 months total €196.7 million at the end of 2009 (€262.1 million at the end of 2008) representing 4.2% of customer outstandings (including €109.8 million past due over one year), the majority of which concern amounts invoiced on behalf of local authorities and public bodies, receivables on local authorities and public bodies and VAT.



F-104



Back to Contents


Financial assets maturity schedule as of December 31, 2008.

  

As of December 31,2008

Assets past due but not impaired

  

Gross carrying amount

Provisions

Net carrying amount

Assets not yet due

(€ million)

Note

0-6 months

6 months - 1 year

More than 1 year

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,763.8 

(12.6) 

5,751.2 

5,738.4

7.2

5.6

-

Trade receivables

13

10,253.0 

(550.9) 

9,702.1 

6,649.7

2,258.2

387.4

406.8

Other current operating receivables

13

1,314.1 

(59.6) 

1,254.5 

819.5

162.5

162.1

110.4

Other non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

803.0 

(63.4)

739.6 

739.6

 -

 -

 -

Current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

283.3 

(27.9) 

255.4 

188.6

45.2

12.3

9.3

Loans and receivables

 

18,417.2 

(714.4) 

17,702.8 

14,135.8

2,473.1

567.4

526.5

Other non-current financial assets

11

91.5 

(13.8) 

77.7 

77.7

 -

 -

 -

Other current financial assets

11

70.2 

(4.2) 

66.0 

17.7

30.5

3.9

13.9


Financial assets maturity schedule as of December 31, 2007:

  

As of December 31, 2007

Assets past due but not impaired

  

Gross carrying amount

Provisions

Net carrying amount

Assets not yet due

(€ million)

Note

0-6 months

6 months - 1 year

More than 1 year

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,633.6

(6.0)

5,627.6

5,624.4

2.5

0.7

-

Trade receivables

13

9,813.7

(510.0)

9,303.7

6,335.5

2,305.0

309.7

353.5

Other current operating receivables

13

1,508.1

(75.1)

1,433.0

784.0

451.5

134.1

63.4

Other non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

572.6

(57.6)

515.0

515.0

-

-

-

Current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

174.1

(21.3)

152.8

123.3

15.7

6.2

7.6

Loans and receivables

 

17,702.1

(670.0)

17,032.1

13,382.2

2,774.7

450.7

424.5

Other non-current financial assets

11

231.0

-

231.0

231.0

-

-

-

Other current financial assets

11

177.2

-

177.2

177.2

-

-

-


29.4.2

Counterparty risk relating to investment and hedging activities

The Group is exposed to credit risk relating to the investment of its surplus cash and its use of derivative instruments in order to manage interest rate and currency risk. Credit risk corresponds to the loss that the Group may incur should a counterparty default on its contractual obligations. In the case of derivative financial instruments, this risk corresponds to the fair value of all the instruments contracted with a counterparty insofar as this value is positive.

The Group minimizes counterparty risk through internal control procedures limiting the choice of counterparties to leading banks and financial institutions (banks and financial institutions with a minimum Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s or Fitch’s rating of A1/P1/F1 respectively for transactions with a term of less than one year and of A2/A/A respectively for transactions with a term of more than one year). Limits are determined for each counterparty based primarily on the rating awarded by the rating agencies.agencies and the size of their equity, and are reviewed monthly. In addition, derivative transactions are only entered into with counterparties with whom the Group has an ISDA or FBF framework agreement.



F-105



Back to Contents


Deposit counterparty risk is managed by the Treasury and Financing Department which centralizes the bulk of cash surplusespositions of Group entities. In the companies where cash surplus are not invested in Group instruments especially for mandatory purposes or due to relations with partners, investment policy is subject to a specific procedure. In this way, the counterparty risk of entities is limited to settlement and account keeping banking activities, signature commitments and the continuation of credit lines obtained from banks with the authorization of the Group Treasury and Financing Department.

Counterparty risk on financial transactions is monitored on an ongoing basis by the Treasury and Financing Department back-office. The Group does not expect any counterparties to default.middle-office. The Group is not exposed to any risk as a result of material concentration.


(f)

Management of liquidity risk

The operational management of liquidity and short-term financing is managed by the Treasury Department.

Similarly, new financing is secured and managed centrally in order to optimize liquidity.

The Group secures financing on the bank lending market, the commercial paper market, international bond markets and international private placement markets.

The Treasury and Financing Department ensures the liquidity of the Group at all times, while taking into account the general conditions of the market. A liquidity report is prepared monthly and reviewed regularly during the monthly markets meeting.


(€ millions)

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Veolia Environnement:

   

Undrawn MT syndicated loans

4,000.0

4,069.0

3,500.0

Undrawn MT credit lines

925.0

725.0

915.0

Undrawn ST credit lines

150.0

250.0

643.1

Marketable securities (*)

17.6

-

1,335.2

Cash and cash equivalents

1,140.5

953.6

2,416.5

Subsidiaries:

   

Marketable securities

48.9

60.7

66.4

Cash and cash equivalents

1,517.5

1,382.5

1,218.7

Total

7,799.5

7,440.8

10,094.9

(*) Treasury shares are not included in the definition of liquidity.

As of December 31, 2006,2009, Veolia Environnement hadSA’s total liquiditiesoutstandings exposed to credit risk amounted to €4,049.8 million with regard to investments and €272 million with regard to derivative instruments (sum of €7.8the fair values of assets and liabilities). These counterparties are investment grade for up to 97% of the total exposure.

Veolia Environnement SA cash surpluses (€4.05 billion including cash and cash equivalents and marketable securitiesas of €2.7 billion.

Central cash surplusesDecember 31, 2009) are managed with a profitability objective close to that of the monetarymoney market and avoiding exposure to capital risk byand maintaining a low level of volatility. Investment supports primarily comprise

They were injected into the following types of investment:

non-dynamic monetary UCITS (with the AMF Euro Monetary classification) for €3,038 million,

certificates of deposit and term deposits with a maturity of less than three months with leading French banks with a rating from Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s or Fitch: A1+/P1/F1 in the short term for €350 million,

negotiable debt instruments (certificates of deposit, etc.) and equivalent.

In 2006, the Group continued its policy of optimizing the cost andsecurities with a maturity of its liquiditiesless than three months issued by renegotiatingCAC40 or Eurostoxx 50 companies for €275 million,

monetary notes issued by leading French banks with a rating from Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s or Fitch: A1+/P1/F1 in the €150 million credit line with Natexis, maturing November 29, 2007.  




Back to contents



Syndicated loan and bilateral credit line documentation does not contain any financial ratio covenants (although in some cases they limit the proportion of the Group’s debt that may be incurred by subsidiaries, rather than by Veolia Environnement).  In addition, substantially all of our debt agreements contain standard restrictions, such as negative pledge clauses that limit our ability to pledge our assets to secure our debt, as well as events of default in case of non-payment, failure to comply with covenants, acceleration of other debts in amounts exceeding specified thresholds, and other customary circumstances.

Given the liquidity position of the Group, liquidity risk would currently appear to be low or even nil.


(g)

Management of other risks

Sensitivity analysis of actuarial debt is disclosed in note 34

Sensitivity analysis of impairment tests of goodwill is disclosed in note 4.



Note 33

Fair value of financial assets and liabilities


See Note 1.14 Accounting principles and methods.


Financial assets

The following tables present the net carrying amount and fair value of Group financial assets as of December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004:


(€ millions)

Note

As of December 31, 2006

  

Net carrying amount

Fair value

  

Available-for-sale assets

Loans and receivables

Assets at fair value through the Income Statement

Total

Non-consolidated investments

9

181.7

181.7

-

-

181.7

Other non-current financial assets

11

637.5

91.5

546.0

 

637.5

Operating receivables

13

10,968.7

-

10,968.7

-

10,968.7

Other current financial assets

14

205.3

 

205.3

 

205.3

Marketable securities

15

66.4

66.4

-

-

66.4

Cash and cash equivalents

16

2,658.0

-

-

2,658.0

2,658.0



(€ millions)

 

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

  

Net carrying amount

Fair value

  

Available-for-sale assets

Loans and receivables

Assets at fair value through the Income Statement

Total

Non-consolidated investments

 

209.5

209.5

-

-

209.5

Other non-current financial assets

 

691.6

252.1

439.5

-

691.6

Operating receivables

 

10,083.3

-

10,083.3

-

10,083.3

Other current financial assets

 

221.2

-

221.2

-

221.2

Marketable securities

 

60.7

60.7

-

-

60.7

Cash and cash equivalents

 

2,336.1

-

-

2,336.1

2,336.1





Back to contents




(€ millions)

 

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

  

Net carrying amount

Fair value

  

Available-for-sale assets

Loans and receivables

Assets at fair value through the Income Statement

Total

Non-consolidated investments

 

181.1

181.1

-

-

181.1

Other non-current financial assets

 

606.7

186.9

419.8

-

606.7

Operating receivables

 

9,233.9

-

9,233.9

-

9,233.9

Other current financial assets

 

333.0

-

333.0

-

333.0

Marketable securities

 

189.3

72.1

-

117.2

189.3

Cash and cash equivalents

 

4,660.3

-

-

4,660.3

4,660.3


Financial liabilities

The following tables present the net carrying amount and fair value of Group financial liabilities as of December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004:


(€ millions)

 

As of December 31,

  

2006

2005 adjusted

2004 adjusted

 

Note

Net carrying amount

Fair value

Net carrying amount

Fair value

Net carrying amount

Fair value

Borrowings and other financial liabilities:

       

-

long-term bonds

19

8,417.5

8,635.6

7,857.9

8,333.0

6,752.1

7,116.0

-

other long-term borrowings

19

5,584.1

5,640.4

5,864.9

5,985.7

5,404.9

5,404.9

-

current borrowings

21

2,904.1

2,904.1

2,138.2

2,138.2

5,426.1

5,426.1

-

bank overdrafts and other cash position items

22

456.0

456.0

506.8

506.8

420.1

420.1

Other non-current liabilities

20

207.3

207.3

203.7

203.7

159.7

159.7

Operating payables

13

11,268.6

11,268.6

10,369.8

10,369.8

9,572.2

9,572.2


The fair value of long-term debt is calculated as follows:

• Bonds:

- listed debt is recorded at market value

- unlisted debt is recorded at net carrying amount

- USPP bonds are recorded at theoretical value.


• other borrowings:

- significant fixed-rate borrowings denominated in euro, U.S. dollar or pound sterling are recorded at historical market value

- other borrowings are recorded at net carrying amount.



short term for €385 million.

Note 34NOTE 30

Employee commitments


benefit obligation

Share-based compensation


Veolia Environnement share purchase and subscription option plans

The Group does not have any cash-settlement plans.

Veolia Environnement has implemented several standard fixed share purchase and subscription option plans, as well as a variable plan for management. The only share purchase plan was created on June 23, 2000.




Back to contents



Outstanding option plans at the end of 20062009 were as follows:

 

N°7

N°6

N°5

N°4

N°3

N°2

 

2007

2006

2004

2003

2002

2001

Grant date

07/17/2007

03/28/2006

12/24/2004

03/24/2003

01/28/2002

02/08/2001

Number of options granted

2,490,400

4,044,900

3,341,600

5,192,635

4,413,000

3,462,000

Number of options not exercised

635,850 (*)

3,709,861

3,080,738

1,571,010

1,929,114

0

Plan term

8 years

8 years

8 years

8 years

8 years

8 years

Vesting conditions

4 years service plus performance conditions to be satisfied

4 years service

3 years service plus performance conditions for certain plans

3 years service

3 years service

3 years service

Vesting method

After 4 years

After 4 years

By tranches of 1/3 over 3 years

By tranches of 1/3 over 3 years

By tranches of 1/3 over 3 years

After 3 years

Strike price
(in euros)

57.05

44.03**

24.32**

22.14**

36.65**

40.59**


*

Given the performance criteria, the number of options effectively exercisable has been reduced from 1,742,650 in 2008.

**

Strike price adjusted to take account of transactions impacting the share capital of the Company (issue of share subscription warrants on December 17, 2001 and share capital increases with retention of preferential subscription rights on August 2, 2002 and July 10, 2008). To recap, the initial strike prices for plans no. 2, no. 3, no. 4, no. 5 and no. 6 were €42.00, €37.53, €22.50, €24.72 and €44.75 respectively.



F-106


 

N°6

N°5

N°4

N°3

N°2

N°1

 

2006

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

Grant date

03/28/2006

12/24/2004

03/24/2003

01/28/2002

02/08/2001

06/23/2000

Number of options granted

4,044,900

3,341,600

5,192,635

4,413,000

3,462,000

780,000

Number of options after legal adjustments

4,044,900

3,341,600

5,192,635

4,418,959

3,526,446

784,201

Number of options not exercised

3,979,200

3,274,586

3,917,619

2,885,388

2,510,616

232,849*

Plan term

8 years

8 years

8 years

8 years

8 years

8 years

Vesting conditions

4 years service

3 years service plus performance conditions for certain plans

3 years service

3 years service

3 years service

3 years service plus performance conditions to be satisfied

Purchase terms

After 4 years

By tranches of 1/3 over 3 years

By tranches of 1/3 over 3 years

By tranches of 1/3 over 3 years

After 3 years

After 3 years

Strike price (in euros)

44.75

24.72

22.50

37.25**

41.25**

31.92**


*Back to Contents

Given

2008 and 2009:

The Group did not grant any share options in 2008 or 2009.

2007:

In 2007, the Group granted 2,490,400 share options to two employee groups. The first group comprises Veolia Environnement Group management, including members of the Executive Committee. The second group comprises senior managers of Veolia Environnement Group companies and employees recognized for their excellent performance criteria,in 2006. The estimated fair value of each option granted in 2007 was €13,91. This value was calculated using the Black and Scholes model based on the following underlying assumptions: share price of €57.26, historical volatility of 21.75%, expected dividend yield of 2%, risk-free interest rate of 4.59%, estimated exercise maturity of 6 years.

In 2007, the Group granted 333,700 Free Shares to employees recognized for their excellent performance in 2006. In France, rights vest after two years, followed by a two year lock-in period and are subject to performance conditions. Outside France, rights vest after four years subject to performance conditions. The estimated fair value of each free share granted in 2007 was €57.26, net of dividends not received during the vesting period and, for shares granted to French employees, a discount for non-transferability.

Finally, in 2007, the Group granted 205,200 Stock Appreciation Rights (SAR) to ordinary shares to three groups of employees: firstly, Veolia Environnement Group management, secondly senior managers of Veolia Environnement Group companies and thirdly employees recognized for their excellent performance in 2006. Rights vest after four years subject to performance conditions. As of December 31, 2009, the estimated fair value of each option granted in 2007 is €0.195. This value was calculated using the Black and Scholes model based on the following underlying assumptions: share price of €22.52, historical volatility of 33.24%, expected dividend yield of 5.35%, risk-free interest rate of 1.99%, estimated exercise maturity of 3 years, subscription price of €57.20.

The number of options granted under the three 2007 plans (share options, free shares and SAR) was determined based on the increase in net earnings per share between December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2008. This has been taken into account in the calculation of the number of options effectively exercisable has been reduced.vested and the compensation expense.

**

Strike price adjusted to take account of transactions impacting the share capital of the Company (issue of share subscription warrants on December 17, 2001 and share capital increase with retention of preferential subscription rights on August 2, 2002). The initial strike prices for plans n°1, n°2 and n°3 were €32.50, €42.00 and €37.53 respectively.2006:

In 2006, the Group granted 4,044,900 share options to three employee groups. The first group comprises Veolia Environnement Group management, including members of the Executive Committee. The second group comprises senior management of Veolia Environnement Group companies. The third group comprises Group employees recognized for their excellent performance.

The estimated fair value of each option granted in 2006 was €10.01. This value was calculated using the Black and Scholes method, is €14.77. This value ismodel based on the following underlying assumptions: share price of €44.75, expectedhistorical volatility of 31.51%22.6%, expected dividend rateyield of 1.92%, risk-free interest rate of 3.69%.

The Group did not grant any ordinary share options or ADS share options in 2005.

In 2004, the Group granted 3,341,600 share options to three employee groups. The first group comprised Veolia Environnement management, including members, estimated exercise maturity of the Veolia Environnement Executive Committee, the second group comprised senior Group executives and the third group comprised key Group employees. Given 2005 results, the options have definitively vested, subject to continued presence in the company.

The estimated fair value of each option granted in 2004, calculated using the binomial method, is €6.56. This value is based on the following underlying assumptions: share price of €25.89, expected volatility of 21.45%, expected dividend rate of 2.1%, risk-free interest rate of 3.4%. The number of options granted is based on the level of ROCE, which is taken into account in calculating both the number of options vested and the compensation expense.

Given the progressive vesting conditions based on length of presence in the company, the compensation expense for 2006 and 2005 is €16.7 million and €16.2 million respectively.




Back to contents



6 years.

Information on share purchase and subscription options granted since 20002001 is detailed below, with a breakdown of movements in 2004, 20052007, 2008 and 2006:2009 (share option plans excluding SAR plans and free share plans):

 

Number of shares outstanding

 

Weighted average strike price (in € )

As of December 31, 2006

16,800,258

 

33.67

Granted

2,490,400

 

57.05

Adjustment for share capital increase of July 10, 2007

228,525

 

33.79

Exercised

(4,046,076)

 

30.20

Cancelled

(51,934)

 

49.70

Expired

-

 

-

As of December 31, 2007

15,421,173

 

37.71

Granted

-

 

-

Exercised

(886,095)

 

28.36

Cancelled

(242,056)

 

46.78

Expired

(1,804,495)*

 

56.17

As of December 31, 2008

12,488,527

 

35.53

Granted

   

Exercised

(31,011)

 

25.06

Cancelled

(148,418)

 

46.05

Expired

(1,382,525)

 

40.59

As of December 31, 2009

10,926,573

 

34.78

* including 1,742,650 shares due to failure to meet performance conditions




F-107


 

Number of shares outstanding

 

Weighted average strike price (in € )

As of December 31, 2003

13,743,800

 

32.71

Granted

3,510,041

 

25.28

Exercised

-

 

-

Cancelled

(470,084)

 

32.38

Expired

-

 

-

As of December 31, 2004

16,783,757

 

30.93

Granted

-

 

-

Exercised

(168,692)

 

33.07

Cancelled

(650,721)

 

28.43

Expired

-

 

-

As of December 31, 2005

15,964,344

 

31.01

Granted

4,044,900

 

44.75

Exercised

(3,065,733)

 

34.32

Cancelled

(143,253)

 

36.04

Expired

-

 

-

As of December 31, 2006

16,800,258

 

33.67


Back to Contents


The average share price at the time of option exercise in 2009 was €24.21.

Details of Veolia Environnement share purchase and subscription options outstanding as of December 31, 20062009 are as follows:

Strike price

Number of options outstanding

 

Average strike price

(in euros)

 

Average residual term

(in years)

 

Number of options vested

20-25

4,651,748

 

23.58

 

2.39

 

4,651,748

35-40

1,929,114

 

36.65

 

0.08

 

1,929,114

40-45

3,709,861

 

44.03

 

4.24

 

0

55-60

635,850

 

57.05

 

5.54

 

0

 

10,926,573

 

34.78

 

3.40

 

6,580,862


Strike price

Number of options

outstanding

 

Average strike price

(in €)

 

Average residual term

(in years)

 

Number of options vested

20-25


7,192,205

 

23.51

 

5.03

 

6,156,132

30-35


232,849

 

31.92

 

1.48

 

232,849

35-40


2,885,388

 

37.25

 

3.08

 

2,885,388

40-45


6,489,816

 

43.40

 

5.26

 

2,510,616

 

16,800,258

 

33.67

 

4.73

 

11,784,985

In 2006, the average share price on the exercise of options was €49.36.

As of December 31, 2006, 9,546,472 options were available for exercise.


2009, 6,580,862 can be exercised.

EmployeesEmployees’ savings plans

Veolia Environnement has introducedset-up standard and leveraged savings plans which enable a large number of employees of Veolia Environnement and its subsidiaries to subscribe for Veolia Environnement shares. Employees benefit from a 20% discount compared with the average Veolia Environnement share price during the 20 business days preceding the date of authorization of these plans by the Board of Directors. Shares subscribed by employees under these plans are subject to certain restrictions regarding their sale or transfer by employees.

Veolia Environnement did not introduce any new employee savings plans in 2008.

Shares subscribed by Veolia Environnement employees:employees in 2007 and 2009:


2006

 

2005

2004

2009

2007

Number of shares

1,502,731

 

1,281,931

1,351,468

624,387

1,415,163

Subscription price

€37.52

 

€28.11

€18.71

€21.28

€48.37 (*)

Amount subscribed (€ millions)

56.4

 

30.5

25.3

Amount subscribed (€ million)

13.3

68.5


(*)

weighted average price - 1,392,857 shares were subscribed at €48.18 and 22,306 were subscribed at €60.23 (leveraged formula with the grant of share subscription warrants in Germany and leveraged formula with the grant of SAR in Australia, Canada, South Korea, Portugal and Sweden).


(*)

weighted average price - 1,392,857 shares were subscribed at €48.18 and 22,306 were subscribed at €60.23 (leveraged formula with the grant of share subscription warrants in Germany and leveraged formula with the grant of SAR in Australia, Canada, South Korea, Portugal and Sweden).


In 2005,2009, in the absence of a discount for plan subscribers, the expense recognized for the savings plan totaled €5.1 million and corresponds to the contribution valued as of July 3, the transaction closing date, less a non-transferability discount for the standard plan of €915,000.

In 2007, a compensation expense of €14.1€49.7 million was recorded in accordance with IFRS 2 on share-based payments. This compensation includes a discount for non-transferability of €7.2 million.

In 2006, a compensation expense of €24.3 million was recorded in accordance with IFRS 2 on share-based payments. In 2006, Veolia Group appliedapplies the recommendations of the CNC (communiqué of December 21, 2004 on Group Savings Plans and supplementary notice of February 2, 2007) and, as such, this compensation includes a discount for non-transferability of €6.8 million.. The discount for non-transferability iswas determined by calculating the difference between the value of a five-year forward sale of shares and the spot purchase of the same number of shares, (€49.18), financed by a loan. The risk-free interest rate and the interest rate for calculating the carrying cost are 3.70%were 4.05% and 6.40% respectively.6.74% in 2007 and 2.76% and 6.90% in 2009. The notional cost of non-transferability of shares as a percentage of the spot rate of the shares at the grant date iswas 12%. in 2007 and 17.9% in 2009.



F-108



Back to Contents


Pension plans and other post-employment benefits


a-a - Description of plans


In accordance with the regulatory environment and collective agreements, the Group has established defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans (company or multi-employer) in favor of employees and other post-employment benefits.


In addition, Group companies havecertain subsidiaries, supplementary defined contribution plans in the majority of countries where the Group is present.were set up. Expenses incurred by the Group under these plans total €61.3€91 million for 2006.




Back to contents




2009 and €89 million for 2008.

Certain Group subsidiariescompanies have established defined benefit pension plans.plans and/or offer other post-employment benefits (mainly retirement termination payments). The largest defined benefit pension plans are located in the United Kingdom, with a pension obligation as of December 31, 20062009 of €1,175€988 million (including €307 million for Cleanaway, purchased in 2006)(and plan assets of €857 million) and in France with a pension obligation as of December 31, 20062009 of €382€478 million (and plan assets of €127 million), notably in respect of retirement termination payments. Benefits are based on the remuneration and length of services of employees.


Under collective agreements, certain Group companies participate in multi-employer defined benefit pension plans. However, as these plans are unable to provide a consistent and reliable basis for the allocation of the obligation, assets and costs between the different participating entities, they are recorded as defined contribution plans in accordance with IAS 19. The main multi-employer plans are located in Sweden, Germany and the Netherlands and concern approximately 11,70011,500 employees. The corresponding expense recorded in the Income Statementconsolidated income statement is equal to annual contributions and totals €26.1slightly over €29 million in 2006.2009 compared to €32 million in 2008. Multi-employer plans in Sweden and the Netherlands are funded by capitalization and have surplus assets under local regulations;capitalization; German multi-employer plans are funded by redistribution.


The Group also offers post-employment benefits and notably health insurance plans in the United States and France.


b-

b- Obligations in respect of defined benefit pension plans and other post-employment benefits

The following tablesschedules present the resulting obligations in respect of defined benefit pension plans and other post-employment benefits


Note:NB: these tablesschedules exclude, by definition, defined contribution pension plans (as the obligation is limited to the annual contribution expensed in the year and the plans do not, therefore, result in the recording of a provision based on actuarial valuations) and multi-employer defined benefit pension plans which are accounted for as defined contribution pension plans.



F-109


(€ millions)

As of December 31,

 

Pension Plans

Other post-employment benefits

Change in the benefit obligation

2006

2005

2004

2006

2005

2004

Benefit obligation at beginning of year

1,457.4

1,103.4

994.1

25.9

24.5

3.1

Current service cost

55.6

49.7

62.9

1.5

0.6

0.4

Interest cost

67.2

57.6

48.4

2.1

1.3

1.5

Plan participants’ contributions

6.0

6.5

4.8

-

-

-

Benefit obligation assumed on acquisition of subsidiaries

325.2

33.4

3.5

25.1

-

-

Benefit obligation transferred on disposal of subsidiaries

(0.9)

(0.8)

(35.1)

-

-

-

Curtailments / liquidations

(9.4)

(9.5)

(3.9)

-

(3.1)

-

Actuarial loss (gain)

(15.6)

237.8

45.7

0.9

(1.0)

-

Benefits paid

(68.2)

(66.5)

(46.0)

(2.1)

(1.5)

(1.9)

Plan amendments

20.6

4.7

20.8

-

-

8.0

Other (incl. foreign exchange translation)

(1.9)

41.1

8.2

0.4

5.1

13.4

(1) Benefit obligation at end of year

1,836.0

1,457.4

1,103.4

53.8

25.9

24.5


The Projected Benefit Obligation (PBO) is €297.8 million for unfundedBack to Contents


b-1 Change in the defined benefit obligation (D.B.O)

 

As of December 31,

(€ million)

Pension plans and other post-employment benefits

(excluding health insurance coverage of retirees)

Health insurance coverage
of retirees

Change in the defined benefit obligation

2009

2008

2007

2009

2008

2007

Defined benefit obligation at beginning of year

1,522.0

1,733.4

1,836.0

41.7

41.0

53.8

Current service cost

51.3

53.4

61.8

0.6

1.4

1.6

Interest cost

89.4

88.7

85.7

2.4

2.2

2.3

Plan participants’ contributions

5.7

7.1

7.9

-

-

-

Benefit obligation assumed on acquisition of subsidiaries

5.1

7.3

41.3

-

-

-

Benefit obligation transferred on disposal of subsidiaries

(14.3)

(20.4)

(2.3)

-

-

-

Curtailments

Liquidations

(9.3)

(1.1)

(5.0)

(23.2)

(3.3)

(9.6)

-

(2.6)

-

-

(8.3)

-

Actuarial loss (gain)

142.6

(75.2)

(128.5)

1.3

(3.7)

(5.9)

Benefits paid

(78.8)

(79.2)

(75.6)

(2.8)

(3.1)

(2.6)

Plan amendments

3.3

43.0

21.1

-

-

-

Other (incl. changes in consolidation scope and foreign exchange translation)

54.2

(207.9)

(101.1)

0.9

3.9

0.1

(1) Defined benefit obligation at end of year

1,770.1

1,522.0

1,733.4

41.5

41.7

41.0

Other changes in the defined benefit obligation for pension plans and €1,538.2other post-employment benefits (excluding medical insurance coverage of retirees) primarily concern the impact of foreign exchange translation (€60 million for partially and fully funded plans as of December 31, 2006, compared with €284.3 million and €1,173.1 million respectively at the end of 2005.in 2009).

b-2 Change in plan assets

 

As of December 31,

(€ million)

Pension plans and other post-employment benefits

(excluding health insurance coverage of retirees)

Health insurance coverage of retirees

Change in plan assets

2009

2008

2007

2009

2008

2007

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

901.1

1,242.7

1,220.8

-

-

-

Expected return on plan assets

58.6

72.8

70.9

-

-

-

Actuarial gains (losses)

79.2

(219.6)

(5.6)

-

-

-

Group contributions

63.4

45.2

74.9

-

-

-

Plan participants’ contributions

5.7

7.1

7.9

-

-

-

Plan assets acquired on acquisition of subsidiaries

4.1

1.8

24.8

-

-

-

Plan assets transferred on disposal of subsidiaries

(2.4)

(1.6)

(0.5)

-

-

-

Liquidations

(0.9)

(12.2)

(9.9)

-

-

-

Benefits paid

(50.5)

(49.0)

(47.8)

-

-

-

Other (incl. changes in consolidation scope and foreign exchange translation)

43.6

(185.9)

(92.8)

-

-

-

(2) Fair value of plan assets at end of year

1,101.9

901.1

1,242.7

-

-

-




F-110


(€ millions)

As of December 31,

 

Pension Plans

Other post-employment benefits

Change in plan assets

2006

2005

2004

2006

2005

2004

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

867.2

714.2

668.5

-

-

-

Expected return on plan assets

55.4

46.2

38.5

-

-

-

Actuarial gains (losses)

21.5

57.2

21.7

-

-

-

Group contributions

62.0

64.3

39.9

-

-

-

Plan participants’ contributions

6.0

6.5

4.8

-

-

-

Plan assets acquired on acquisition of subsidiaries

243.1

0.1

-

-

-

-

Plan assets transferred on disposal of subsidiaries

(0.1)

-

(27.5)

-

-

-

Liquidations

-

(3.6)

(0.3)

-

-

-

Benefits paid

(45.2)

(39.8)

(28.6)

-

-

-

Other (incl. foreign exchange translation)

10.9

22.1

(2.7)

-

-

-

(2) Fair value of plan assets at end of year

1,220.8

867.2

714.2

-

-

-


The actual return onBack to Contents


Other changes in plan assets was €76.9primarily concern the impact of foreign exchange translation (€51 million in 2006, compared to €103.4 million in 2005.2009).

Group pension plan assets were invested as follows as of December 31, 2006, 20052009, 2008 and 2004:2007:


 

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

Shares

51%

47%

42%

Bonds and debt instruments

39%

36%

36%

Insurance risk free funds

8%

10%

12%

Cash

1%

6%

8%

Other

1%

1%

2%




Back to contents
 

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31,2007

Shares

46%

46%

50%

Bonds and debt instruments

41%

40%

38%

Insurance risk-free funds

13%

12%

8%

Liquid assets

0%

0%

3%

Other

0%

2%

1%








In addition, the following obligations are covered by third parties:


(€ millions)

2006

2005

Change in repayment entitlement

Fair value of repayment entitlement at beginning of year

7.5

7,2

Expected return on repayment entitlement

0.7

0,3

Actuarial gains (losses)

(0.4)

0,4

Repayment entitlement acquired on acquisition of subsidiaries

18.6

 

Repayments

(0.5)

(0.2)

Other (incl. changes in consolidation scope and foreign exchange translation)

-

(0.2)

Fair value of repayment entitlement at end of year

25.9

7.5


The market value of repayment entitlement recorded in assets as of December 31, 2006 is €25.9 million. Repayment entitlement concerns employee rights to post-employment benefits, corresponding to periods during which they were employed by a previous employer.



(€ millions)

As of December 31,

 

Pension Plans

Other post-employment benefits

 

2006

2005

2004

2006

2005

2004

Funding status= (2) – (1)

(615.2)

(590.2)

(389.1)

(53.8)

(25.9)

(24.5)

Unrecognized past service costs

50.3

33.2

36.4

7.0

7.7

7.6

Other

(5.3)

(2.8)

(2.0)

-

0.8

-

Net obligation

(570.2)

(559.8)

(354.7)

(46.8)

(17.4)

(16.9)

Provisions

(580.0)

(560.2)

(368.5)

(46.8)

(17.4)

(16.9)

Prepaid benefits

9.9

0.4

13.8

-

-

-

Employer contributions in 2006 include exceptional contributions in France of €7.5 million.

The Group plans to make contributions of €48.0 million to defined benefit plans in 2007.


Net benefit costs for the period, expensed in operating income, are as follows:


(€ millions)

As of December 31,

 

Pension Plans

Other post-employment benefits

 

2006

2005

2004

2006

2005

2004

Current service cost

55.6

49.7

62.9

1.5

0.6

0.4

Interest cost

67.2

57.6

48.4

2.1

1.3

1.5

Expected return on plan assets

(55.4)

(46.2)

(42.7)

-

-

-

Expected return on repayment entitlement

(0.7)

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Past service costs recognized in the year

3.8

2.4

0.9

0.5

0.5

0.2

Liquidations

(10.1)

(4.9)

(0.1)

-

-

(6.8)

Other

(1.8)

4.6

(4.3)

-

-

-

Net benefit cost

58.6

63.2

65.1

4.1

2.4

(4.7)


c- Actuarial assumptions


Actuarial assumptions used for calculation purposes vary depending on the country in which the plan is implemented. Group assets in France are primarily invested with insurance companies and the expected long-term return on these assets is directly linked to past rates of return. Assets in the United Kingdom are primarily invested in shares and bonds via a trust and expected long-term rates of return are based on long-term market performance statistics.

The actual return on plan assets (expected return on plan assets + actuarial gains/losses) was €137.8 million at the end of 2009, compared to -€146.8 million at the end of December 2008 and €65.3 million at the end of December 2007.

The expected return on plan assets in 2010 is €64 million.

Group contributions in 2009 include exceptional contributions of €7 million in the United Kingdom.

The Group plans to make contributions of €46 million to defined benefit plans in 2010.

b-3 Change in funding status and the provision

 

As of December 31

 

Pension plans and other post-employment benefits

(excluding health insurance coverage of retirees)

Health insurance coverage of retirees

(€ million)

2009

2008

2007

2009

2008

2007

Funding status = (2) – (1)

(668.2)

(620.9)

(490.7)

(41.5)

(41.7)

(41.0)

Unrecognized past service costs

88.4

96.6

61.2

0.6

-

-

Other

0

(2.1)

(6.4)

 

-

-

Net obligation

(579.8)

(526.4)

(435.9)

(40.8)

(41.7)

(41.0)

Provisions

(594.2)

(539.8)

(445.3)

(40.8)

(41.7)

(41.0)

Prepaid benefits

14.4

13.6

9.4

0

-

-




F-111



Pension PlansBack to Contents


EmployeesProvisions for post-employment benefits total €635.0 million, compared to €581.5 million in 2008. In 2009, this amount notably includes provisions of €7.2 million reclassified in the consolidated statement of financial position in Liabilities directly associated with assets held for sale (i.e. an amount of €627.8 million recorded in the consolidated statement of financial position).

The defined benefit obligation (DBO) is €347 million for unfunded defined benefit pension obligationsplans and other post-employment benefits (excluding medical insurance coverage of retirees) and €1,423 million for partially or fully funded plans as of December 31, 2006, 20052009, compared to €341 million and 2004€1,181 million at the end of 2008 and €334 million and €1,441 million at the end of 2007.

b-4 Change in repayment entitlement

(€ million)

Change in repayment entitlement

2009

2008

2007

Fair value of repayment entitlement at beginning of year

22.3

21.5

25.9

Expected return on repayment entitlement

0.9

0.9

1.1

Actuarial gains (losses)

0.9

(1.0)

(3.3)

Repayment entitlement acquired on acquisition of subsidiaries

-

-

-

Repayments

(1.9)

(1.6)

(2.2)

Other (including new repayment entitlements)

0.2

2.5

-

Fair value of repayment entitlement at end of year

22.4

22.3

21.5


The market value of repayment entitlement recorded in assets as of December 31, 2009 is €22.4 million. Repayment entitlement concerns the portion of employee rights to post-employment benefits (including medical insurance coverage of retirees) corresponding to periods during which the employee was employed by a previous employer or where the operating contract stipulates that employee entitlement to post-employment benefits is assumed by a third party.'

b-5 Impact on the consolidated income statement

The net benefit cost for the period is as follows:

 

As of December 31

 

Pension plans and other post-employment benefits

(excluding health insurance coverage of retirees)

Health insurance coverage of retirees

(€ million)

2009

2008

2007

2009

2008

2007

Current service cost

51.3

53.4

61.8

0.6

1.4

1.6

Interest cost

89.4

88.7

85.7

2.4

2.2

2.3

Expected return on plan assets

(58.6)

(72.8)

(70.9)

-

-

-

Expected return on repayment entitlement

-

-

(1.1)

(0.9)

(0.9)

-

Past service costs recognized in the year

10.2

9.4

7.6

0.4

-

0.1

Curtailments / liquidations

(9.5)

(16.3)

(3.1)

(2.6)

-

-

Other(1)

(12.3)

(1.2)

(0.3)

-

2.2

-

Net benefit cost(2)

70.5

61.2

79.7

(0.1)

4.9

4.0


(1)

In 2009, the “Other” heading primarily includes provision charges and reversals for labor commitments involving contract gains and losses.

(2)

The 2008 cost excludes the Clemessy and Crystal entities, divested in December 2008.


These costs were recorded in full in operating income, except for interest costs and the expected return on plan assets which are recorded in net finance costs.



F-112



Back to Contents


c - Actuarial assumptions

Actuarial assumptions used for calculation purposes vary depending on the country in which the plan is implemented.

Pension plans and other post-employment benefits (excluding medical insurance coverage of retirees)

The benefit obligation in respect of pension plans as of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 is based on the following average assumptions:

 

As of
December 31,
2009

As of
December 31,
2008

As of
December 31,
2007

Discount rate

5.23%

5.83%

5.49%

Expected rate of salary increase

3.66%

3.8%

3.5%


As of December 31, 2009, the discount rates in the main areas with regard to post-employment commitments are as follows:

Pension Obligations

As of December 31, 2006

As of  December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

Discount rate

4.74%

4.45%

5.0%

Expected rate of salary increase

3.65%

3.3%

3.8%

As of
December 31, 2009

United Kingdom

5.5%

Euro zone

5.25%


Periodic movementsThe expected returns on plan assets in pension benefit obligations2009, 2008 and 2007, as defined at the start of each year to determine the amount recorded in 2006, 2005 and 2004the income statement, are based onas follows:

 

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31,
2008

As of
December 31,
2007

Expected return on plan assets

6.5%

6.4%

6.0%

Average residual active life expectancy (in years)

13.0

12.0

12.0


In the following average assumptions:





Back to contents






 

As of December 31, 2006

As of  December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

Discount rate

4.45%

5.0%

5.4%

Expected return on plan assets

6.2%

6.3%

6.6%

Expected rate of salary increase

3.3%

3.8%

3.8%

Average residual active life expectancy (in years)

13.8

15.0

15.0


United Kingdom, where the vast majority of plan assets are located, the expected return, as defined at the start of 2009, was 7%.

The actual return on plans assets in 20062009, 2008 and 20052007 was 7.4%13.8%, -13.7% and 14.3%5.3% respectively.

The Group benefit obligation is especially sensitive to the discount rate and inflation. A 1% increase ofin the discount rate decreaseswould decrease the benefit obligation by €248€237 million and current service costs by €8€10 million. A 1% decrease ofin the discount rate increaseswould increase the benefit obligation by €300€284 million and current service costs by €11€13 million.

AConversely, a 1% increase ofin the inflation rate increaseswould increase the benefit obligation by €310€231 million and current service costs by €11€9 million. A 1% decrease ofin the inflation rate decreaseswould decrease the benefit obligation by €251€201 million and current service costs by €8 million€7 million.

A 1% increase in the expected rate of return assumption would generate additional income of €7.8 million.


Other post-employment benefitsMedical insurance coverage of retirees

Additional assumptions concerning health insurance plans are as follows:


Average rate of increase in health insurance costs

As of
December 31,
2006

As of
December 31,
2005

As of
December 31,
2004

Assumed rate of increase in health costs in the coming year

5.54%

8.4%

8.6%

Target rate of increase in costs

4.0%

4.2%

4.2%

Year long-term rate is expected to stabilize

2014

2016

2016


Average rate of increase in health insurance costs

As of
December 31,
2009

As of
December 31,
2008

As of
December 31,
2007

Assumed rate of increase in health costs in the coming year

4.9%

5.1%

5.4%

Target rate of increase in costs

3.5%

3.6%

3.5%

Year long-term rate is expected to stabilize

2019

2020

2020

Assumptions concerning increasesthe growth in health insurance costs impact the post-employment benefit obligation as follows: a 1% increase in growththe assumed rate of increase in health insurance costs increaseswould increase the post-employment benefit obligation by €5.2€6.9 million whileand, conversely, a 1% decrease in growth health insurance costs decreaseswould reduce the post-employment benefit obligation by €4.5€5.3 million.


Assumptions concerning the growthrate of increase in health insurance costs have a minimal impact on the current service cost.



F-113



Back to Contents



Amounts for the current and four prior periodperiods are as follows:

Retirement plans and other post-employment benefits(excluding medical insurance coverage of retirees)

2009

2008

2007

2006

Benefit obligation at year end

(1,770.1)

(1,522.0)

(1,733.4)

(1,836.0)

Fair value of plan assets at year end

1,101.9

901.1

1,242.7

1,220.8

Funded status

(668.2)

(620.9)

(490.7)

(615.2)

Actuarial gains (losses) / experience adjustments on obligations

(11.7)

8.8

(0.7)

3.4

% of the benefit obligation

0.66%

-0.58%

0.04%

-0.19%

Actuarial gains (losses) / experience adjustments on plan assets

79.2

(219.6)

(5.6)

21.5


Pension Obligations

2006

2005

Medical insurance coverage of retirees

2009

2008

2007

2006

Benefit obligation at year end

(1,836.0)

(1,457.4)

(41.5)

(41.7)

(41.0)

(53.8)

Fair value of plan assets at year end

1,220.8

867.2

 

-

-

Funded status of plan

(615.2)

(590.2)

Funded status

(41.5)

(41.7)

(41.0)

(53.8)

Actuarial gains (losses) / experience adjustments on obligations

3.4

(15.6)

0.5

1.9

-0.7

% of the benefit obligation

-1.20%

-4.56%

-4.63%

1.30%

Actuarial gains (losses) / experience adjustments on plan assets

21.5

57.2

-

-

-



Other post-employment benefits

2006

2005

Benefit obligation at year end

(53.8)

(25.9)

Fair value of plan assets at year end

-

-

Funded status of plan

(53.8)

(25.9)

Actuarial gains (losses) / experience adjustments on obligations

(0.7)

1.6

Actuarial gains (losses) / experience adjustments on plan assets

-

-


The Cumulative cumulative amounts ofactuarial gains/(losses) gains and losses on obligations and assets recognized in equity amount to -€ 167.4 millionother comprehensive income and the change in the asset ceiling are as year ended and to -€ 203.6 million as of December 31, 2005.follows:

 

2009

2008

2007

Cumulative amount as of January 1

(185.8)

(48.3)

(172.7)

Change during the period

(61.7)

(137.5)

124.4

Cumulative amount as of December 31

(247.5)

(185.8)

(48.3)


Note 35NOTE 31

Main acquisitions in 2006

31.1

Acquisitions in 2009

Acquisitions in 2009 with related net cash flows fromof less than €100 million represent business combination costs of €195 million. These acquisitions contributed €110 million to Group revenue in 2009.

In general, goodwill balances are justified by synergies with existing operations in the acquisitions exceeding €50 million are described hereafter.Group and future developments.

31.2


Acquisitions in 2008

Acquisition of Cleanaway United Kingdom

On September 28, 2006, the Waste Management Division purchased the entire share capital of Cleanaway United Kingdom. This company specializes in waste collectionAcquired asset and processing and operates under municipal and industrial contracts.




Back to contents



This transaction was recognized using the purchase accounting method.

However, the allocation of the purchase price is likely to be modified in 2007 and the assetliability fair values recorded at the period end are provisional. They break down as follows:


(€ millions)

 

Net carrying amount

Fair value adjustments

Fair value

Assets

    

Intangible assets

 

1.7

37.2

38.9

Property, plant and equipment

 

222.2

0.9

223.1

Deferred tax assets

 

45.3

-

45.3

Working capital assets

 

148.2

(2.0)

146.2

Cash

 

6.6

-

6.6

Liabilities

    

Non-current provisions

 

(173.7)

(4.4)

(178.1)

Long-term borrowings

 

(128.6)

-

(128.6)

Deferred tax liabilities

 

(1.0)

(25.7)

(26.7)

Current provisions

 

(6.0)

-

(6.0)

Working capital liabilities

 

(140.2)

5.3

(134.9)

Short-term borrowings

 

(0.8)

-

(0.8)

Total net assets

 

(26.3)

11.3

(15.0)

Net assets purchased (100%)

   

(15.0)

Residual goodwill

   

759.7

Purchase price

   

744.7

Cash flows relating to the acquisition

   

738.1

Purchase price

   

744.7

Cash transferred in

   

6.6

The portion of the purchase price allocated to intangible assets corresponds to the value of long-term contracts acquired.

Residual goodwill of €759.7 million corresponds in equal parts to potential savings in operating expenses and capital expenditure as a result of the integration of the company into existing activities of the Waste Management Division2008 in the United Kingdom and to the Group’s ability to generate commercial development potential.

Cleanaway United Kingdom contributed €185.5 million to Group revenue in 2006 (one activity quarter).





Back to contents



Acquisitionopening balance sheets of Biffa Belgium

In May 2006, the Waste Management Division purchased the entire share capital of Biffa Belgium. This company specializes in waste processing in the Belgium market.

This transaction was recognized using the purchase accounting method.

The net assets acquired and the goodwill recognized break down as follows:


(€ millions)

 

Net carrying amount

Fair value adjustments

Fair value

Assets

    

Intangible assets

 

0.3

(0.1)

0.2

Property, plant and equipment

 

26.1

1.1

27.2

Deferred tax assets

 

-

3.7

3.7

Working capital assets

 

24.4

0.3

24.7

Cash

 

23.8

-

23.8

Liabilities

    

Non-current provisions

 

(28.9)

1.3

(27.6)

Deferred tax liabilities

 

-

(2.2)

(2.2)

Working capital liabilities

 

(19.1)

(0.8)

(19.9)

Total net assets

 

26.6

3.3

29.9

Net assets purchased (100%)

   

29.9

Residual goodwill

   

32.5

Purchase price

   

62.4

Cash flows relating to the acquisition

   

38.6

Purchase price

   

62.4

Cash transferred in

   

23.8

Residual goodwill of €32.5 million corresponds notably to potential savings in operating expenses and capital expenditure and to the Group's ability to renew contracts and commercial development potential.

Biffa Belgium contributed €40.5 million to Group revenue in 2006.





Back to contents



Acquisition of Kunming – proportionately consolidated 49%

Following the agreements signed at the end of 2005 with the Kunming municipality (China), the Water Division acquired joint control in May 2006 of the company holding a 30-year contract for the production and distribution of water and customer service management.

This transaction was recognized using the purchase accounting method. The fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the period end is provisional and breaks down as follows:


(€ millions)

 

Net carrying amount

Fair value adjustments

Fair value

Assets

    

Intangible assets

 

131.0

80.7

211.7

Non-current financial assets

 

0.2

-

0.2

Working capital assets

 

21.3

-

21.3

Current financial assets

 

-

-

-

Cash

 

13.0

-

13.0

Liabilities

    

Deferred tax liabilities

 

-

(26.6)

(26.6)

Current provisions

 

(0.3)

-

(0.3)

Working capital liabilities

 

(14.6)

-

(14.6)

Total net assets

 

150.6

54.1

204.7

Net assets purchased (49%)

   

100.3

Residual goodwill

   

-

Purchase price

   

100.3

Cash flows relating to the acquisition

   

93.9

Purchase price

   

100.3

Cash transferred in (49%)

   

6.4


Fair value adjustments relating to intangible assets corresponds to the value of the long-term contract acquired.

The company contributed €20 million to Group revenue in 2006 (7 months activity).




Back to contents



Acquisition of ZEC LODZ

The net assets acquired and the2008 acquisitions not yet definitive goodwill recognized break down as follows:


(€ millions)

 

Net carrying amount

Fair value adjustments

Fair value

Assets

    

Intangible assets

 

1.0

 

1.0

Property, plant and equipment

 

137.7

83.2

220.9

Non-current financial assets

 

1.5

2.9

4.4

Deferred tax assets

 

5.9

1.8

7.7

Working capital assets

 

26.2

(1.0)

25.2

Current financial assets

 

0.1

-

0.1

Cash

 

18.1

-

18.1

Liabilities

    

Non-current provisions

 

(19.2)

(0.1)

(19.3)

Long-term borrowings

 

(1.5)

 

(1.5)

Deferred tax liabilities

 

-

(15.9)

(15.9)

Current provisions

 

(3.8)

(1.8)

(5.6)

Working capital liabilities

 

(25.0)

-

(25.0)

Total net assets

 

141.0

69.1

210.1

Net assets purchased (51%)

   

107.1

Residual goodwill

   

(0.1)

Purchase price

   

107.0

Cash flows relating to the acquisition

   

88.9

Purchase price

   

107.0

Cash transferred in

   

18.1





Back to contents



Acquisition of Supershuttle

In October 2006, the Transportation Division acquired Supershuttle, which specializes in transportation-on-demand services for airports in the United States.

This transaction was recognized using the purchase accounting method.

However, the allocation of the purchase price is likely to be modified in 2007 and the asset fair values recorded at the period end are provisional. They break down as follows:


(€ millions)

 

Net carrying amount

Fair value adjustments

Fair value

Assets

    

Intangible assets

 

16.9

(16.8)

0.1

Property, plant and equipment

 

2.2

-

2.2

Deferred tax assets

 

4.6

6.5

11.1

Working capital assets

 

15.0

-

15.0

Cash

 

7.1

(5.7)

1.4

Liabilities

    

Non-current provisions

 

(0.7)

(0.4)

(1.1)

Other non-current liabilities

 

(25.7)

25.7

-

Current provisions

 

-

(0.2)

(0.2)

Working capital liabilities

 

(19.4)

2.9

(16.5)

Total net assets

 

0

12.0

12.0

Net assets purchased (100%)

   

12.0

Residual goodwill

   

60.4

Purchase price

   

72.4

Cash flows relating to the acquisition

   

71.0

Purchase price

   

72.4

Cash transferred in

   

1.4


The company contributed €11 million to Group revenue in 2006 (2 months activity).





Back to contents



Acquisition of SNCM

On May 31, 2006, the Transportation Division signed an agreement for the takeover of SNCM within the framework of the privatization process decided by the French State, for €12.6 million.

This transaction was recognized using the purchase accounting method. Due to shareholders' agreement, SNCM is consolidated using the full consolidation.  However as the purchase price allocation procedures were not terminated as of December 31, 2006, the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed2008 (Tianjin Shibei at the year end is provisional and is contingent on approval by the European Commission of the State aideVeolia Eau-CGE in China, Bartin Aero Recycling Group at Veolia Propreté, and the awarding ofPraterm Group at Veolia Energie in Poland) were not materially changed during the public service license for Marseille–Corsica crossings (see note 3).12-month allocation period following their acquisition date.



F-114


(€ millions)

 

Net carrying amount

Fair value adjustments

Fair value

Assets

    

Intangible assets

 

1.3

-

1.3

Property, plant and equipment

 

124.4

268.6

393.0

Non-current financial assets

 

138.6

(28.5)

110.1

Deferred tax assets

 

-

53.1

53.1

Working capital assets

 

109.1

(4.1)

105.0

Cash

 

99.3

-

99.3

Liabilities

    

Non-current provisions

 

(95.6)

(169.3)

(264.9)

Long-term borrowings

 

(2.9)

(31.3)

(34.2)

Deferred tax liabilities

 

-

(66.7)

(66.7)

Other non-current liabilities

 

(38.5)

38.5

-

Current provisions

 

(2.0)

(93.1)

(95.1)

Working capital liabilities

 

(166.4)

2.3

(164.1)

Short-term borrowings

 

(0.3)

(48.3)

(48.6)

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

 

(7.8)

0.1

(7.7)

Total net assets

 

159.2

(78.7)

80.5

Net assets purchased (28.29%)

   

22.8

Residual goodwill

   

10.2

Purchase price

   

12.6

Cash flows relating to the acquisition

   

(79.0)

Purchase price

   

(12.6)

Cash transferred in

   

91.6



The company contributed €207.2 millionBack to Group revenue in 206 (7 months activity).Contents


A minority put options have been recognized under non-current financial debt for €61.9 million as of December 31, 2006 and is not included in the information disclosed above.






Back to contents



Note 36

Construction contracts


NOTE 32

Construction contracts (IAS 11)


(€ millions)

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

As of December 31, 2004 adjusted

Construction contracts in progress / Assets (A)

70.0

54.8

41.7

Construction contracts in progress / Liabilities (B)

109.3

73.3

70.8

Construction contracts in progress / net (A) - (B)

(39.3)

(18.5)

(29.1)

Costs incurred plus income and losses recognized to date (C)

1,397.7

1,153.3

822.7

Amounts billed (D)

1,437.0

1,171.8

851.8

Construction contracts in progress / net (C) – (D)

(39.3)

(18.5)

(29.1)

Customer advances

21.4

195.4

107.7


TheAs described in Note 1.23, Veolia recognizes its construction contracts under the percentage of completion method. At each period-end, a statement per contract compares the amount of costs incurred, plus profits and less losses recognized (notably in(including any provisions for losses to completion) andwith the intermediary billings is determined on an individual contract basis. Where positive, this amount is recognized in assets inbillings: “Construction contracts in progress/progress / Assets”. Where negative, it is therefore a contract for which the costs incurred and profits recognized in liabilities in “Construction contracts in progress/Liabilities”.exceed the billing issued.


Construction contracts IFRIC12 (BOT and incinerators in progress)


(€ millions)

As of December 31, 2006

Construction contracts in progress / Assets (A)

333.3

Construction contracts in progress / Liabilities (B)

-

Construction contracts in progress / net (A) - (B)

333.3

Costs incurred plus income and losses recognized to date (C)

428.6

Amounts billed (D)

-95.3

Construction contracts in progress / net (C) – (D)

333.3


(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December31, 2008

As of
December 31,2007

Construction contracts in progress / Assets (A)

358.7

495.6

593.8

Construction contracts in progress / Liabilities (B)

292.4

332.2

232.0

Construction contracts in progress / net (A) – (B)

66.3

163.4

361.8

Costs incurred plus income and losses recognized to date (C)

5,413.7

4,404.8

4,068.7

Amounts billed (D)

5,347.4

4,241.4

3,706.9

Construction contracts in progress / net (C) – (D)

66.3

163.4

361.8

Customer advances

36.8

355.8

41.2


Note 37NOTE 33

Concession contracts (IFRIC 12)

In the course of its business, Veolia Environnement provides collective services (distribution of drinking water and heating, passenger transport network, household waste collection, etc.) to local authorities with a remuneration based on services rendered.

These collective services (also known as services of general interest or general economic interest or public services) are generally managed by Veolia Environnement under contracts entered into at the request of public bodies which retain control thereof.

Concession contracts involve the transfer of operating rights for a limited period, under the control of the local authority, using dedicated installations built by Veolia Environnement, or made available to it for a fee or nil consideration:

·

These contracts define “public service obligations” in return for remuneration. The remuneration is based on operating conditions, continuity of service, price rules and obligations with respect to the maintenance/replacement of installations. The contract determines the conditions for the transfer of installations to the local authority or a successor at its term.

·

Veolia Environnement can, in certain cases, be responsible for a given service as it holds the service support network (water/heat distribution network, water treatment network). Such situations are the result of full or partial privatizations. Provisions impose public service obligations and the means by which the local authority may recover control of the concession holder.

These contracts generally include price review clauses. These clauses are mainly based on cost trends, inflation, changes in tax and/or other legislation and occasionally on changes in volumes and/or the occurrence of specific events changing the profitability of the contract.

In addition, the Group generally assumes a contractual obligation to maintain and repair facilities managed under public service contracts. Resulting maintenance and repair costs are analyzed in accordance with IAS 37 on provisions where necessary, a provision for contractual commitments is recorded where there is outstanding work to be performed.Operating leases

The nature and extent of the Group’s rights and obligations under these different contracts differ according to the public services rendered by the different Group divisions.

The accounting treatment is disclosed in the notes 1.20, 5 and 10.


Water:

Veolia Environnement manages municipal drinking water and/or waste water services. These services encompass the full water cycle (extraction from natural sources, treatment, storage and distribution followed by collection and treatment of waste water and release into the environment).

In France, these services are primarily rendered under public service delegation affermage contracts with a term of 8 to 20 years. They concern the distribution of drinking water and/or the collection and treatment of waste water. They use specific assets, such as distribution or wastewater treatment networks and drinking water or wastewater treatment plants, which are generally provided by the concession grantor and returned to it at the end of the contract.




Back to contents



Abroad, Veolia Environnement renders its services under contracts which reflect local legislation, the economic situation of the country and the investment needs of each partner.

These contracts are generally concession contracts, service contracts or O&M (Operate & Manage) and BOT contracts with an average term of between 7 and 40 years, and sometimes longer.

Contracts can also be entered into with public entities in which Veolia Environnement purchased an interest on their partial privatization. The profitability of these contracts is not fundamentally different from other contracts, but operations are based on a partnership agreement with the local authority.


Waste Management:

Both in France and abroad, Veolia Environnement generally operates under concession contracts for the treatment and recovery of waste in sorting units, storage and incineration. These contracts have an average term of 18 to 30 years.


Energy Services:

Veolia Environnement has developed a range of energy management activities: heating and cooling networks, thermal and multi-technical services, industrial utilities, installation and maintenance of production equipment, integration services for the comprehensive management of buildings and electrical services on public roadways.

The main contracts concern the management of heating and air-conditioning networks under urban concessions or on behalf of local authorities.

In Eastern Europe, Veolia Environnement’s Energy Services Division provides services under mixed partial privatizations or through public-private partnerships with local authorities responsible for the production and distribution of thermal energy.


Transportation:

Veolia Environnement’s Transportation Division provides passenger transport services on behalf of local, regional and national public authorities.

Veolia Environnement primarily provides these services in France and abroad under service contracts comprising public service obligations (as per EU terminology), with terms of 7 to 15 years.


Note 38

Finance Leases and Operating Leases


Assets financed by finance lease

Assets financed by finance leases as of December 31, 2006 are as follows:


(€ millions)

Property, plant and equipment, net

Concession intangible assets

Operating financial assets

Total

As of December 31, 2006

433.0

327.1

362.7

1,122.8

As of December 31, 2005 adjusted

n.av.

n.av.

n.av.

925.0

As of December 31, 2004 adjusted

n.av.

n.av.

n.av.

970.4



As of December 31, 2006, future minimum lease payments under these contracts were as follows:


(€ millions)

Finance lease in the BS

2007

227.5

2008

204.8

2009

144.8

2010

114.2

2011

96.6

2012 and thereafter

456.1

Total future minimum lease payments

1,244.0

Less amounts representing interest

246.6

Present value of minimum lease payments (finance leases)

997.4


These discounted amounts of €997.4 million as of December 31, 2006 are recorded as borrowings (€866.1 million in long-term borrowings and €131.3 million in short-term borrowings).


Assets financed by operating lease

In addition, the Group enters into operating leases (mainly for transportation equipment)equipment and constructions).





Back to contents



The future minimum lease payments under operating leases amount to €2,125.9€2,753.7 million as of December 31, 2006,2009, compared to €1,894.5€2,530.4 million as of December 31, 20052008 and €1,754.7€2,190.0 million as of December 31, 2004.


2007.

As of December 31, 2006,2009, future minimum lease payments under these contracts were as follows:

(€ million)

Operating lease

2010

567.7

2011 & 2012

864.5

2013 & 2014

624.6

2015 and thereafter

696.9

Total future minimum lease payments

2,753.7


(€ millions)

Operating lease

2007

496.1

2008

441.6

2009

320.3

2010

228.0

2011

189.6

2012 and thereafter

450.3

Total future minimum lease payments

2,125.9

Lease payments for the period

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31, 2007

Minimum lease payments expensed in the period

630.9

609.7

523.4

Contingent rent expensed in the period

18.7

13.6

17.1

Total lease payments for the period

649.6

623.3

540.5


Sub-lease revenue is not material.

Assets leased under operating leases

The value of assets concerned by operating leases within the Group is not material



Note 39F-115



Back to Contents


NOTE 34

Proportionately consolidated companies

Summarized financial information in respect of proportionately consolidated companies is set out below:below (Group part):

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31, 2007

Non-current assets

8,188.4

7,682.7

6,757.3

Current assets

3,984.1

3,670.8

3,115.5

Total assets

12,172.5

11,353.5

9,872.8

Equity attributable to owners of the Company 

3,128.1

2,910.7

2,295.9

Equity attributable to non-controlling interests

915.1

801.6

895.5

Non-current liabilities

3,295.8

3,016.6

2,650.8

Current liabilities

4,833.4

4,624.6

4,030.6

Total equity and liabilities

12,172.4

11,353.5

9,872.8


(€ millions)

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

Non-current assets

5,651.9

5,635.3

4,968.7

Current assets

2,898.2

2,450.2

2,349.6

Total assets

8,550.1

8,085.5

7,318.3

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

1,367.0

1,375.3

1,203.0

Minority interests

945.9

759.0

700.9

Non-current liabilities

3,293.4

3,230.0

2,716.3

Current liabilities

2,943.8

2,721.2

2,698.1

Total equity and liabilities

8,550.1

8,085.5

7,318.3

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31, 2007

Income Statement data

   

Revenue

5,520.3

5,481.1

4,623.7

Operating income

636.8

612.6

659.9

Net income for the year

326.5

261.2

322.9

Financing data

  

 

Operating cash flows

819.8

712.3

567.0

Investing cash flows

(644.9)

(621.7)

(566.8)

Financing cash flows

(316.1)

(533.2)

(289.9)



(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31,2005 adjusted

Year ended December 31,2004 adjusted

Income Statement data

   

Revenue

4,143.4

3,679.1

3,109.3

Operating income

540.1

430.9

305.7

Net income for the year

109.9

100.1

137.4

Financing data

   

Operating cash flow

521.2

525.4

277.0

Investing cash flow

(258.0)

(347.0)

(354.0)

Financing cash flow

(281.3)

(274.2)

190.7

The main contributions ofmost material proportionately consolidated companies wereare as follows:

·

BWB (Berlin water services company) in the Water Division in Germany is 50% consolidated and contributed revenue of €582€602 million, operating income of €201€225 million, net assets of €2,625€2,735 million and borrowingsnet debt of €1,429€1,498 million;

·

Dalkia International is 75.79%75.81% consolidated and contributed revenue of €1,696€2,282 million, operating income of €177€158 million and net assets of €1,215€1,857 million;

·

The Proactiva Group in South America contributed revenue of €117€202 million, operating income of €11€26 million and net assets of €34€108 million;

The Shenzhen and Tianjin Shibei contracts in the Water Division in China are 25% and 49% consolidated respectively and contributed €138 million and €48 million respectively to revenue and €237 million and €150 million respectively to net assets;

A change in the governance of the partnership with Mubadala Development Company on December 22, 2009 led to a change in consolidation method (from full to proportionate consolidation) for the activity of the Water Division in North Africa and the Middle East. This change in governance also resulted in financial debt restructuring, whereby the Group granted a 16-year loan for €121 million at a fixed rate of 5.7% (market conditions).



F-116



Back to Contents



Note 40NOTE 35

Tax reviewsaudits

In the normal course of their business, the Group's subsidiariesGroup entities in France and abroad are subjected to regular tax reviews in France and abroad.audits.

In 2006, most of the tax reviews carried out in the French companies of the four divisions did not result in the notification of revised assessments of any significant amount. The Group is currently in discussion withFrance, the tax authorities regardinghave carried out various tax audits in respect of both consolidated tax groups and individual entities, including a significant number of reviews focusing specifically on local taxes. The tax audits concerning the revised assessments outstandingmajor Group companies in France, including Veolia Environnement SA, were closed in 2009. To date, none of these reviews have led to material liabilities to the tax authorities in excess of amounts estimated during the review of tax risks and the booking of provisions in accordance with IAS 37. Certain amounts are still being negotiated with the French tax authorities.

Outside France, the Group is present in numerous countries and is constantly subject to tax audits. Among the countries where the Group has a strong presence, tax audits were in progress as of December 31, 2006. Given both legislative changes at the end of 20062008 in Germany and the nature of discussions, the Group expects its position to prevailMorocco were completed in 2009. The liabilities arising from these tax audits had been anticipated and provided for in accordance with regard to differences in principle and the most material amounts. Reviews which could lead to additional tax expenses were adequately provided.IAS 37.

The Group operates in nearly 65 countries and is regularly reviewed outside France. Tax reviewsaudits are notablystill in progress, particularly in Germany, Gabon andItaly. Discussions continued in 2009 with the United States of America.Italian tax authorities. Where necessary, claimsrevised assessments and outstandingidentified uncertain tax matterspositions in respect of which a claimrevised assessment has not been yet issued are adequately provided, and provision amounts are regularly reviewed in accordance with IAS 37IAS37 criteria.




Back to contents



Note 41

Commitments and contingencies

Specific commitments given


·

Southern Water operation

As part ofIn the sale of Southern Water, Société Générale Bank and Trust SA onUnited States, the one hand and CDC IXIS on the other, exercised their put options. The Group has no more obligationslaunched a pre-filing agreement procedure with the Internal Revenue Service (I.R.S) in order to these partiesvalidate the amount of tax losses as of December 31, 2006.2006, following the reorganization of Water Division activities (“Worthless Stock Deduction”). This reorganization led to the recognition of ordinary losses resulting from the operations and disposal of former U.S. Filter activities in respect of fiscal years 1999 to 2004, in an amount which could exceed U.S.$ 4 billion. No major event took place in 2009 that could call into question the Group’s position.

NOTE 36


Off-balance sheet commitments

·Specific commitments given

Specific Berlin contract commitments

Under the Berlin water contract, the Group may be obligedplans to purchaseacquire easement rights of passage for water pipes from landowners still not indemnified who have presented claims for payments. landowners.

The cost to the Groupgross amount of this investment could total up toreach €426 million (50%). In the event, approximately €175 million of acquisition of these rights by land owners, these rightswhich would represent an element of the remuneration of the Berlin water contractbe borne by the Berlin Lander, representing a net commitment of €250 million.

Given the uncertain nature of estimating these easement rights, this commitment was retained off-balance sheet as of December 31, 2007.

More precise estimates were performed in 2008, producing a valuation of €113 million (100%), including a portion, estimated at €57 million, to be reimbursed by the Berlin Lander. The Group therefore recognized an asset and disbursments wouldoperating liability of €113 million. As these rights vest over the period to 2011, the amounts paid will be recorded, net of amounts reimbursed by the Berlin Lander, in operating financial assets inand remunerated pursuant to the Group balance sheet.contract.


·

Agreements with EDF

Veolia Environnement granted EDF a call option covering all of its Dalkia shares in the event an EDF competitor takes control of the company.

Likewise EDF granted Veolia Environnement a call option covering all of its Dalkia shares, exercisable in the event of a change in the legal status of EDF and should a Veolia Environnement competitor, acting alone or in concert, takestake control of EDF. Failing an agreement on the share transfer price, this would be decided by an expert.



Breakdown by maturity of specific commitments givenF-117


(€ millions)

As of December 31,
2004 adjusted

As of December 31,
2005 adjusted

As of December 31,
2006

Maturity

 

Less than
1 year

1 to 5 years

More than
5 years

Southern Water Put

312

321

-

-

-

-

Specific Berlin contract commitment (50%)

610

610

426

75

347

4

Specific commitments given

922

931

426

75

347

4



Back to Contents


Other commitments given


Other commitments and contingencies include neither collateral guarantees supporting borrowings (see Note 42)38) nor specific commitments and contingencies described above.


Other off-balance sheet commitments and contingencies arebreak down as follows:


(€ millions)

As of
December
31,2004 adjusted

As of December
31,2005 adjusted

As of December
31, 2006

Maturity

Less than
1 year

1 to 5 years

More than
5 years

(€ million)

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2008

As of December 31, 2009

Maturing in

Less than
1 year

1 to 5 years

More than
5 years

Operational guarantees including performance bonds

2,860.9

3,108.4

4,043.6

808.3

1,561.5

1,673.8

5,591.4

6,624.9

6,950.9

2,442.4

2,418.8

2,089,7

Financial guarantees

     

 835.6

667.5

679.4

229.4

275.8

174.2

Debt guarantees

154.6

250.8

300.7

98.2

111.6

90.9

355.6

303.0

258.3

89.3

113.6

55.4

Vendor warranties given

488.7

515.5

448.6

19.0

315.5

114.1

Vendor warranties received

480.0

364.5

421.1

140.1

162.2

118.8

Commitments given

     

617.1

507.8

431.6

283.7

97.6

50.3

Obligations to buy

101.0

94.6

149.3

113.7

34.3

1.3

Obligations to sell

28.5

8.6

31.3

19.4

9.9

2.0

Purchase commitments

589.9

476.5

425.1

277.8

97.6

49.7

Sales commitments

27.2

31.3

6.5

5.9

-

0.6

Other commitments given

     

957.3

912.7

1,065.3

489.4

267.2

308.7

Letters of credit

578.5

819.7

904.5

278.9

621.3

4.3

573.8

706.7

604.5

329.1

152.1

123.3

Other commitments given

807.0

772.2

749.8

181.3

304.1

264.4

383.5

206.0

460.8

160.3

115.1

185.4

Other commitments given

5,019.2

5,569.8

6,627.8

1,518.8

2,958.2

2,150.8

8,001.4

8,712.9

9,127.2

3,444.9

3,059.4

2,622.9


Operational guarantees: in the course of their normal activities, the Group's subsidiaries giveoperational or operating guarantees to their customers. If the company doesencompass all commitments not reach its specified targets, it may have to pay penalties. This commitment is often guaranteed by an insurance company, a financial institution, or the parent company of the Group. These guarantees included in the contract are performance commitments. The insurance company or the financial institution often requires counter guarantees from the parent company. The commitment is the amount of the guarantee anticipated in the contract and given by the parent companyrelating to the customerfinancing of operations, required in respect of contracts and markets and more generally the operations and activities of Group companies. Such guarantees include bid bonds accompanying tender offers, advance payment bonds and completion or the counter guarantee given by the parent company to the insurance company or to the financial institution.

Insurance companies have issued performance bonds in connection withgiven on the activitiessignature of the Group’s US subsidiaries (operating guarantees, site restoration guarantees), which have been underwritten by Veolia Environnement up to a maximum amount of U.S.$1.4 billion (drawn U.S.$0.2 billion at December 31, 2006).


contracts or concession arrangements.

Debt guarantees:guarantees: these relate to guarantees given to financial institutions in connection with the financial debtdebts of non-consolidated




Back to contents



companies, equity associates, or the non-consolidated portion of financial debts of proportionately consolidated companies.


companies when the commitment covers the entire amount.

Vendor warranties given:warranties: these include warranties linked to the sale in 2004 of Water activities in the United States in the amount of €329.6 million and Water assets in the United Kingdom in the amount of €29.7€246.5 million.


Obligations to buy:Purchase commitments: these include commitments given by Group companies to purchase shares in other companies or to invest. As of December 31, 2006,2009, these commitments mainly concerned the TransportationEnergy Services Division (€82.4 million), the Environmental Services Division (€23.0 million), the Waste ManagementTransportation Division (€71.941.1 million) and the Water Division (€52.3241.7 million).

Letters of credit: letters of credit delivered by financial institutions to Group creditors, customers and suppliers guaranteeing operating activities.


These off-balance sheet commitments notably include:

The impact- Off-balance sheet commitments and site restoration provisions:

Pursuant to environmental texts and legislation concerning the operation of changeswaste storage facilities, the Group is obliged to provide financial guarantees to local authorities/government agencies. These guarantees notably encompass the restoration and supervision of the site during 30 years or more, depending on national legislation (currently 60 years in the U.S. dollar exchange rateUnited Kingdom), following its operation.

In this context, performance bonds, letters of credit, etc. are issued to local authorities and other public bodies.

Depending on the contract, these guarantees cover the costs necessary for the restoration of all or part of the site and the supervision of the site during 30 years.

These guarantees are quantified in accordance with legally or contractually-defined procedures. These guarantees, which are given in their total amount from the start of operations, expire at the end of the commitment (termination of restoration work and site supervision).



F-118



Back to Contents


Therefore, the amount of our commitment for the restoration and supervision of waste storage facilities is in general different from the amount of the provision recorded in the Group accounts (see Note 1.13).

Provisions calculated by the Group are based on different valuations (based on internal policies regarding site security and designed for optimal environmental protection), which take into account the progressive nature of the obligation: operation of the storage facility results in progressive damage to the site and, as such, a related liability is recognized as the facility is operated.

If the amount of the commitment is less than the provision at the balance sheet date, an off-balance sheet commitment is not disclosed. Conversely, if the amount of the commitment is greater than the provision, an off-balance sheet commitment is disclosed in the amount not provided.

-engineering and construction activities:

Total commitments and contingencies is approximately -€257.4 million and mainly concernsgiven in respect of construction activities in the Water Division (-€79.4 million)(Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies) amount to €2,823.6 million as of December 31, 2009, compared to €2,969.8 million as of December 31, 2008 and Veolia Environnement (-€132.1 million)€1,630.4 million as of December 31, 2007.

Total commitments received (see below) in respect of these same activities amount to €757.2 million as of December 31, 2009, compared to €856.9 million as of December 31, 2008 and €866.2 million as of December 31, 2007.

Commitments given and received in respect of the five principal contracts account for approximately 80% of total commitments.

-commitments given in respect of concession contracts:

Pursuant to public service contracts with a public entity, the Group may be called on/obliged to invest in infrastructures that will then be operated and remunerated in accordance with contractual terms and conditions.

The contractual commitment may concern both the financing of installations and infrastructures to be used in operations and also the maintenance and replacement of infrastructures necessary to operations.

An analysis of the accounting treatment of these commitments is presented in Notes 1.21, 1.14 and 17.

Expenditure relating to the replacement or restoration of installations is monitored and recognized through any timing differences between the total contractual commitment over the contract term and its realization, in accordance with the IAS 37 on Provisions.

Expenditure relating to the construction, maintenance and restoration of concession assets is reviewed with respect to IFRIC 12 and detailed in Note 1.21.

Firm commodity purchase commitments:

As part of supply management and cost optimization, certain Group subsidiaries may be required, depending on their activities, to set-up derivatives to fix the cost of commodity supplies where the contracts do not offer appropriate protection (see Note 29.1.3) or contract forward purchases or sales of commodities.

Firm commodity purchase commitments mainly concern:

coal in the Energy Services Division in Central European countries

gas in the Energy Services Division (mainly in France) and in the Water Division

electricity in the Water Division

With regard to both gas and electricity, the number of contracts signed enables the Group to significantly reduce political and counterparty risk.

forward purchases of fuel are primarily contracted by the Transportation Division (SNCM).



F-119



Back to Contents


Other commitments and contingencies given break down by Division as follows:


(€ millions)

As of December
31, 2006

As of December
31,2005 adjusted

As of December
31,2004 adjusted

Water

3,253.2

2,388.4

2,334.5

Waste Management

876.7

715.2

645.2

Energy Services

543.0

541.6

497.7

Transportation

294.9

274.4

216.7

Proactiva

5.7

10.3

12.9

Holding companies

1,598.3

1,584.7

1,278.1

Other

56.0

55.2

34.1

Total

6,627.8

5,569.8

5,019.2


The increase of commitments given by Water division results from new commitment contracts in Middle East.

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31, 2007

Water

6,036.4

5,891.8

4,368.3

Environmental Services

831.1

901.7

1,171.1

Energy Services

700.3

538.1

755.7

Transportation

533.2

415.8

398.3

Proactiva

45.2

50.6

39.8

Holding companies

942.0

891.3

1,241.5

Other

39.0

23.6

26.7

Total

9,127.2

8,712.9

8,001.4


Lease contracts entered into by the Group are analyzed in Note 38.Notes 17 and 33.


Contingent assets and liabilities relating to legal or arbitration proceedings

Litigation (not accounted for)On September 12, 2008, a suburban train operated by Connex Railroad LLC, a Veolia Transport subsidiary, on behalf of the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA), collided with a Union Pacific freight train in Chatsworth, California. This accident resulted in 25 fatalities and a significant number of injuries. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), a federal agency, with which Connex Railroad is cooperating, reached a preliminary conclusion that the two causes of the accident were, first, lack of attention by the engineer, who did not observe a red light and, second, the fact that the SCRRA had not installed an automatic train braking system in compliance with prior recommendations of the NTSB. Actions seeking an undetermined amount of total damages have been filed by the heirs of the deceased passengers and the majority of injured passengers, in the courts of the state of California in Los Angeles, against Connex Railroad LLC, its parent company, Veolia Transportation Inc., the SCRRA and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. These actions have been consolidated into a single case. A hearing specifically dedicated to the issue of liability is scheduled for November 2010. At the same time, Connex Railroad LLC and the SCRRA have brought before the federal courts in California their disputes concerning their respective contractual liability in connection with the suits filed as a result of this accident and are still awaiting a hearing date. A U.S. federal statute limits the total amount of damages that may be awarded for injuries and property damage arising from a single passenger rail accident to U.S.$200 million. Notice of this accident has been given to the relevant insurers of the Group. At this point, the Group is unable to determine whether the financial consequences of this accident could significantly affect its financial position or results.


TheFurthermore, the Group is subject to various litigationseveral other litigations in the normal course of its business. Although it is not possible to predict the outcome of such litigation with certainty, management considers, inIn accordance with IAS 37 criteria, thatmanagement does not consider it appropriate to record a provision is not necessaryor recognize deferred income in respect of these legal or arbitration proceedings at the balance sheet date.date, due to the uncertain nature of their outcome.

Commitments received

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31, 2007

Guarantees received

1,756.3

2,082.0

1,459.7

Debt guarantees

303.4

351.6

266.6

Vendor warranties received

142.0

294.8

53.6

Other guarantees received

1,310.9

1,435.6

1,139.5


The commitments notably consist of commitments received from our partners in respect of construction contracts.

The decrease in 2009 was mainly due to the expiry of a warranty obtained from an acquisition in the Environmental Services Division, the partial terminations in the Construction activity of Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies and the cancellation of the guarantee received from the British Treasury for a credit line repaid at the start of the year.

In addition, the Group has undrawn medium and short-term credit lines and syndicated loans in the amount of €4.7 billion (see Note 29.3).



F-120



Back to Contents


Commitments receivedNOTE 37


Greenhouse gas emission rights

(€ millions)

As of December
31, 2006

As of December
31,2005 adjusted

As of December
31,2004 adjusted

Guarantees received

951.3

1,128.6

270.8

Debt guarantees

171.0

190.5

101.8

Vendor warranties received

34.6

27.4

30.2

Other guarantees received *

745.7

910.7

138.8

The process governing the grant and valuation of these rights is presented in Note 1.25, Greenhouse gas emission rights.

The position in 2009 is as follows:

Volume in thousands of metric tons

As of January 1, 2009

Entries into the consolidation scope

Granted

Purchased / sold / cancelled

Consumed

As of December 31, 2009

Total

1,363

433

13,504

441

(12,187)

3,554


Including,Similarly to 2008, the Group entered into new swaps of EUA II and CER in order to benefit from market opportunities.

At the end of 2007 and during 2008, the Group entered into allowance loan transactions (EUA II and CER) effective in 2008 with surrender in 2012. The commission received on allowance loans is recorded on receipt as deferred income and recognized in the Income Statement on a straight-line basis over the loan term.

Entries into the scope of consolidation concern Energy Services Division acquisitions in France.

Phase II rights granted free of charge for fiscal years 2010-2012 are estimated at €515 million. Future allocations were measured using the spot price as of December 31, 2006, €87.8 million (€566.9 million as of December 31, 2005) in respect of greenhouse gas emission allowances for 2007.


The decrease in commitments received between 2005 and 2006 is mainly due to the reduction of €479 million (only one year and decrease of gas emission allowances unit value) in commitments received in respect of greenhouse gas emission allowances in the Energy Services Division (application of the Kyoto protocol from 2005). This fall is offset by the receipt in the Water Division of a guarantee of €247 million in respect of the construction contract won in December in Middle East.



2009.




Back to contents


NOTE 38


Note 42

Collateral given supporting borrowings

As of December 31, 2006, €8042009, the Group has given €699 million of collateral guarantees in borrowings was supported by collateral guarantees.support of borrowings. The breakdown by type of asset is as follows (in €(€ million):


Type of pledge / mortgage

Amount pledged (a)

Total balance sheet amount (b)

Corresponding %

(a) / (b)

Amount pledged (a)

Total consolidated statement of financial position amount (b)

Corresponding %

(a) / (b)

Intangible assets

2

1,380

0.14%

5

1,438

0.35%

Property, plant and equipment

390

7,919

4.93%

151

9,382

1.61%

Financial assets (*)

389

-

-

Financial assets*

504

-

-

Total non-current assets

781

-

-

660

-

-

Current assets

23

15,024

0.15%

39

20,222

0.19%

Total assets

804

-

-

699

-

-


*

As a majority of financial assets pledged as collateral are shares of consolidated subsidiaries and other financial assets, the ratio is not significant.


*

As a majority of financial assets pledged as collateral are shares of consolidated subsidiaries and other financial assets, the ratio is not significant.


*As financial assets pledged as collateral are essentially shares of consolidated subsidiaries, the ratio is not significant.

F-121



Back to Contents


The breakdown by maturity is as follows:


(€ millions)

As of December 31,2004 adjusted

As of December 31,2005 adjusted

As of December 31, 2006

Maturity

 

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Intangible assets

1

2

2

-

2

-

Property, plant and equipment

253

461

390

50

162

178

Mortgage pledge

92

92

80

-

-

80

Other PP&E mortgage pledge(1)

161

369

310

50

162

98

Financial assets

374

408

389

41

90

258

Delfluent(2) (4)

40

74

102

-

28

74

Shenzhen(2) (4)

89

105

97

-

-

97

Samsung VW Incheon(2) (4)

48

65

62

11

22

29

Crivina(2) (4)

26

34

55

1

13

41

Chengdu(2) (4)

47

49

38

14

18

6

VW Korean Co Hynix(2) (4)

47

28

10

10

-

-

Cle Brazil

16

14

9

-

9

-

Connex Regiobahn

9

6

6

-

-

6

VW Korean Daesan(3) (4)

35

24

5

5

-

-

Technoborgo(2) (4)

5

5

5

-

-

5

PPC(2)

9

-

-

-

-

-

Taitung(2)

3

4

-

-

-

-

Current assets

38

35

23

9

7

7

Pledges on receivables

24

32

21

7

7

7

Pledges on inventories

14

3

2

2

-

-

Total

666

906

804

100

261

443

(€ million)

As of December 31,2007

As of December 31, 2008

As of December 31, 2009

Maturing in

Less than
1 year

1 to 5
years

More than
5 years

Intangible assets

2

2

5

-

1

4

Property, plant and equipment

293

225

151

19

40

92

Mortgage pledge

15

16

37

3

3

31

Other PP&E pledge(1)

278

209

114

16

37

61

Financial assets(2)

313

588

504

10

65

429

Current assets

26

109

39

3

9

27

Pledges on receivables

23

108

39

3

9

27

Pledges on inventories

3

1

0

-

-

-

Total

634

924

699

32

115

552


(1)

mainly equipment and traveling systems.

(2)

including non-consolidated investments of €198 million and other financial assets (primarily operating financial assets) of €306 million as of December 31, 2009.


(1)NOTE 39

mainly equipment and traveling systems.Related-party transactions

(2)

 100%The purpose of equity pledged as collateral.

(3)

95% of equity pledged as collateral.

(4)

Consolidated company as of December 31, 2006this note is to present related-party transactions.


39.1


Note 43“Related party” concept

Group related parties comprise, in accordance with IAS 24, Related party transactionsParty Disclosures, the companies over which the Group exercises control, joint control or significant influence (joint ventures and equity associates), shareholders who exercise joint control over group joint ventures, minority shareholders who exercise significant influence over group subsidiaries, key management personnel of the group and the companies over which the latter exercise control, joint control or significant influence or in which they hold significant voting rights.


Relations with Vivendi Universal


On December 24, 2004, Veolia Environnement acquired 8,128,440 Veolia Environnement shares from Vivendi Universal for €194.8 million.

As of December 31, 2005, Vivendi Universal owned only 5.3% ofIn addition, as the share capital of Veolia Environnement.the Group is widely held, certain shareholders holding a small stake in the share capital are nonetheless considered related parties.

39.2

Compensation and related benefits of key management personnel

Group Executive Committee members and directors represent the key management personnel of the Group.

The following table summarizes amounts due by the Group in respect of compensation and other benefits granted to key management personnel:

(€ million)

As of
December 31,
2009

As of
December 31,
2008

As of
December 31,
2007

Short-term benefits, excluding employer contributions(a)

4.7

8.2

6.9

Employer contributions

2.0

3.2

2.5

Post-employment benefits(b)

1.1

1.2

1.0

Other long-term benefits(c)

-

-

-

Share-based payments

0.6

1.0

1.6

Contract termination payments

-

-

-

Total

8.4

13.6

12.0

(a)

Fixed and variable compensation, employee benefits and directors fees. Variable compensations comprise amounts due in respect of the fiscal year and paid during the next fiscal year.

(b)

Current service costs.

(c)

Other compensation vested but payable in the long-term.




F-122



Back to Contents


As former majority shareholder, Vivendi UniversalAll the Board of Directors members, except the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, only receive as compensation director’s fees from Veolia Environnement and its controlled companies. Director’s fees paid to Directors, excluding the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, totaled €771,795 in 2009, €771,952 in 2008 and €741,380 in 2007.

Item 6 of this annual report filed on Form 20-F contains detailed disclosures on compensation and benefits paid to key management personnel of the Group.

39.3

Transactions with other related parties

39.3.1

Relations with proportionately consolidated companies and equity associates

The Group granted a numberloan of guarantees€1,614.9 million to Dalkia International and its subsidiaries Siram and Dalkia Pologne, which are proportionately consolidated at 75.81% The non-group portion of this loan is recorded in favorassets in the Group consolidated statement of Veolia Environnement which have been transferred. The maximumfinancial position in the amount of guarantees not yet transferred totaled €15.7€390.8 million as of(see Note 11 Other non-current financial assets).

In December 31, 2005.

During 2006, Vivendi Universal2009, the Group sold its remaining interestinvestment in Veolia Environnement.Compagnie Méridionale de Navigation (CMN) which was consolidated using the equity method.


In addition, given the Group’s businesses, operating flows between companies are generally limited to companies operating in the same country. As such, the level of operating transactions between the Group and proportionately consolidated companies is not material.

However, certain contractual agreements within the Water Division, notably in Asia and Central Europe, impose the existence of a holding company (generally equity accounted or proportionately consolidated) and companies carrying the operating contract (generally fully consolidated). These complex legal arrangements generate “asset supply” flows between the companies generally jointly controlled or subject to significant influence and the companies controlled by the Group. Assets are generally supplied for a specific remuneration that may or may not include the maintenance of the installations in good working order or the technical improvement of the installations.

39.3.2

Relations with BNP Paribas (1.25% interest in Veolia Environnement), Société Générale (1.54% interest in Veolia Environnement) and Group shareholders

Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations (9.85%(with a 9.58% interest in Veolia Environnement)share capital).


ManagementThe Chief Executive Officer of these three shareholderthis financial groupsinstitution is represented on the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement.

The Group had the following relations with the Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations during fiscal 2009:

the financing agreements between the two groups bear interest at market conditions.

in connection with the ongoing combination at the year-end between Veolia Transport and Transdev.

Electricité de France (with a 3.70% interest in share capital as of December 31, 2009).

On November 25, 2009, Mr. Proglio was appointed Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the EDF Group by ministerial decree; he also acts as Chairman of the Veolia Environnement Group Board of Directors from November 27, 2009 (publication date of the decree).

EDF Group has a 3.70% interest in Veolia Environnement, a 34% interest in Dalkia and a 25% interest in Dalkia International. In accordance with the Decree 97-07, EDF purchases electricity produced in France by Dalkia cogeneration power plants at market conditions. Electricity sold by Dalkia to EDF in 2007, 2008 and 2009 totaled €521.7 million, €608.4 million and €568.7 million, respectively.



F-123



Back to contentsContents



There are under certain conditions cross options between Veolia Environnement hasand EDF for all the securities held by each party in case of taking control of one or the other (see Note 36 Off-balance sheet commitments).

BNP Paribas (with a 0.57% interest in share capital as of December 31, 2009)

The Chief Executive Officer of BNP Paribas is represented on the Board of Directors of Veolia. The financing relations with theseagreements between the two institutions comprising globalgroups bear interest at market conditions.

Société Générale (with a 0.15% interest in share capital as of December 31, 2009)

The financing arrangements (syndicated loans, bilateral credit lines), structured financing (“Dailly law” discounting of receivables, securitization program, Southern Water and financingagreements between the two groups bear interest at market conditions.

Mr. Bouton, member of the automobile pool) and cash management. Relations are remunerated at market rates.


Veolia Environnement Board of Directors, is no longer Chairman of the Board of Directors of Société Générale as of May 6, 2009.

Vivendi Universal undertook to pay an indemnity to the companyVeolia Environnement in respect of the financial management of replacement expenses and then transferred this obligation to Société Générale under a perfect delegation contract on December 21, 2004. As such, Vivendi Universal no longer has an obligation to Veolia Environnement in this respect.


with respect thereto.

Conversely, the Société Générale, which holds 1.54% of the share capital and is considered a related party, is liable to the companyVeolia Environnement in this respect for a maximum amount of €98.5€17.6 million as of December 31, 2006,2008, which may bewas claimed each year up to 2010 under the conditions laid down in the contract.its entirety as of December 31, 2009.

39.3.3


Relations with other related parties

For 2006, Veolia Environnement claimed an amount of €37.9 million from Société Générale.


Relations with Electricité de France (4% interest inLazard, Groupama, ENI and Saint Gobain

These Groups and Véolia Environnement have common directors.

Any business relations between these groups and Veolia Environnement)are maintained at market conditions.


EDF Group has a 4% interest in Veolia Environnement, a 34% interest in Dalkia and a 25% interest in Dalkia International. In accordance with the Decree 97-07, EDF purchases electricity produced in France by Dalkia cogeneration power plants at a guaranteed fixed price for 2005/2006. Electricity sold by Dalkia to EDF in 2004, 2005 and 2006 totaled €414.8 million, €455.0 million and €482.6 million respectively.


Relations with EBRDFinancial Instruments

Currency

Amount

Less
than
1 year

The European 1 to
5 years

More
than
5 years

Total
assets

Total
liabilities

Forward purchases

NOK

115.3

20.3

64.2

30.8

7.1

-

Forward sales

USD

15.6

4.2

11.4

-

1.0

-

Forward purchases

USD

9.8

9.8

-

-

0.2

-

Forward purchases

SEK

8.9

7.5

1.4

-

-

0.3

Forward purchases

HUF

4.3

4.3

-

-

0.5

-

Total foreign currency derivatives

153.9

46.1

77.0

30.8

8.8

0.3


In 2009, Veolia Environnement Group decided to designate a certain number of currency transactions as hedges as defined by IAS 39.

The majority of the cash flow hedges presented above consist of currency hedges in respect of lease payments on a boat.



F-90



Back to Contents


28.2.4

Hedges of currency exposure in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position by derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

Fair value

As of December 31, 2009

(€ million)

Total

USD

GBP

NOK

SEK

KRW

Other

Forward purchases

(0.9)

(0.7)

(1.0)

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.8

Currency receiver swaps

10.3

8.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.0

1.7

Total currency swaps and forward purchases

9.4

7.5

(0.8)

0.1

0.1

0.0

2.5

Forward sales

(17.4)

2.0

(0.1)

0.1

0.0

(18.5)

(0.9)

Currency payer swaps

(49.1)

1.4

(17.6)

(11.1)

(11.4)

0.0

(10.4)

Total currency swaps and forward sales

(66.5)

3.4

(17.7)

(11.0)

(11.4)

(18.5)

(11.3)

Call options

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Put options

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total currency options

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

(57.1)

10.9

(18.5)

(10.9)

(11.3)

(18.5)

(8.8)


Hedges as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:

Faire value

As of December 31, 2008

(€ million)

Total

HKD

NOK

PLN

Other

Forward purchases

(11.6)

-

(5.0)

(2.3)

(4.3)

Currency receiver swaps

(20.6)

-

-

(1.7)

(18.9)

Total currency swaps and forward purchases

(32.2)

-

(5.0)

(4.0)

(23.2)

Forward sales

(1.6)

-

-

2.2

(3.8)

Currency payer swaps

86.8

28.3

19.3

12.0

27.2

Total currency swaps and forward sales

85.2

28.3

19.3

14.2

23.4

Call options

-

-

-

-

-

Put options

(2.0)

-

-

-

(2.0)

Total currency options

(2.0)

-

-

-

(2.0)

Total derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting(*)

51.0

28.3

14.3

10.2

(1.8)


Fair value

As of December 31, 2007

(€ million)

Total

USD

GBP

Other

Forward purchases

(4.2)

(4.5)

(0.1)

0.4

Currency receiver swaps

(1.8)

-

-

(1.8)

Total currency swaps and forward purchases

(6.0)

(4.5)

(0.1)

(1.4)

Forward sales

9.2

10.2

-

(1.0)

Currency payer swaps

11.5

5.1

3.2

3.2

Total currency swaps and forward sales

20.7

15.3

3.2

2.2

Call options

(0.4)

(0.4)

-

-

Put options

0.8

0.8

-

-

Total currency options

0.4

0.4

-

-

Total derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting(*)

15.1

11.2

3.1

0.8


(*)

Net fair value (Assets–Liabilities) excluding embedded derivatives

The above portfolio of foreign currency derivatives was mainly contracted by Veolia Environnement SA to hedge its foreign currency-denominated net debt (comprising foreign currency-denominated borrowings and foreign currency-denominated inter-company loans and borrowings).



F-91



Back to Contents


28.3

Commodity derivatives

As of December 31, 2009, the fair value of commodity derivatives totaled €63.9 million in assets and €43.6 million in liabilities.

  

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31,2008

(€ million)

Note

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Commodity derivatives

 

63.9

43.6

89.4

107.3

Electricity

 

53.1

18.3

56.3

18.3

Fuel

 

9.1

7.1

22.5

46.5

CO2

 

0.8

0.4

2.1

2.7

Coal

 

0.9

15.5

8.2

15.6

Other

 

-

2.3

0.3

24.2

Pursuant to IAS 39, these derivatives break down as follows:

  

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31,2008

(€ million)

Note

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Commodity derivatives

 

63.9

43.6

89.4

107.3

Fair value hedges

  

0.3

 

2.3

Cash flow hedges

 

10.0

23.9

32.1

64.3

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

 

53.9

19.4

57.3

40.8


Material contract notional amounts (electricity – see Note 1.24) are as follows.

28.3.1

Electricity

  

Notional contract amount as of

December 31, 2009 by maturity

(€ million)

 

Total

Less than
one year

1 to 5 years

More than
five years

Electricity purchase options:

in Gwh

13,196

1,052

2,934

9,210

 

in € million

696.0

55.2

158.4

482.4

Electricity sales commitments:

in Gwh

3,051

1,110

1,941

-

 

in € million

215.2

72.3

142.9

-


Purchase options cover the period 2010 to 2025 and represent a notional amount of €52.3 million, based on valuation assumptions at the year end. Sales commitments cover the period 2010 to 2011 and represent a notional amount of €17.7 million, based on the same valuation assumptions.

A 10% increase or decrease in the price of electricity (all other things being equal) would have an impact on net income of +€1.2 million and -€0.9 million, respectively.



F-92



Back to Contents



  

Notional contract amount as of

December 31, 2008 by maturity

(€ million)

 

Total

Less than
one year

1 to 5 years

More than
five years

Electricity purchase options:

in Gwh

12,854

868

3,063

8,923

 

in € million

667.5

41.9

159.5

466.1

Electricity sales commitments:

in Gwh

3,817

824

2,993

-

 

in € million

250.6

38.2

212.4

-


  

Notional contract amount as of

December 31, 2007by maturity

(€ million)

 

Total

Less than
one year

1 to 5 years

More than
five years

Electricity purchase options:

in Gwh

15,280

935

3,445

10,900

 

in € million

749.6

50.3

169.3

530.0

Electricity sales commitments:

in Gwh

3,202

1,032

2,170

-

 

in € million

177.1

55.7

121.4

-


28.3.2

Greenhouse gas emission rights

Other transactions not qualifying for hedge accounting relate to contracts swapping greenhouse gas emission rights for Carbon Emission certificates, maturing at the end of 2010, 2011 and 2012. These transactions are recorded in assets in the amount of €0.5 million and the impact on the Consolidated Income Statement is a net income of €0.8 million. 



F-93



Back to Contents


NOTE 29

Financial risk management

Group objectives and organization

The Group is exposed to the following financial risks in the course of its operating and financial activities:

Market risks, presented in Note 29.1:

-

interest-rate risk, presented in Note 29.1.1 (interest-rate fair value hedges, cash flow hedges and derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting),

-

foreign exchange risk, presented in Note 29.1.2 (hedges of a net investment in a foreign operation, hedges of balance sheet foreign exchange exposure by derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting, embedded derivatives, overall foreign exchange risk exposure),

-

commodity risk, presented in Note 29.1.3 (fuel and electricity risks, greenhouse gas emission rights).

Equity risk, presented in Note 29.2.

Liquidity risk, presented in Note 29.3

Credit risk, presented in Note 29.4

29.1

Market risk management

29.1.1

Management of interest rate risk

The financing structure of the Group exposes it naturally to the risk of interest rate fluctuations. As such, floating-rate debt impacts future financial results.

Short-term debt is primarily indexed to short-term indexes (Eonia for the treasury note program and Euribor/Libor for the main short-term credit lines). Medium and long-term debt comprises both fixed and floating-rate debt.

The Group manages a fixed/floating rate position in each currency in order to limit the impact of interest rate fluctuations on its net income and to optimize the cost of debt. For this purpose, it uses interest rate swap and swaption instruments.

These swaps may be classified as fair value hedges or cash flow hedges. An interest rate fair value hedge changes fixed-rate financial assets or liabilities into floating rate financial assets or liabilities in order to protect against changes in their fair value. A cash flow hedge protects against changes in the value of cash flows associated with assets or liabilities.

The following table shows the interest-rate exposure of gross debt (defined as the sum of non-current borrowings, current borrowings and bank overdrafts and other cash position items) before and after hedging.

 

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31,2007

(€ million)

Out-
standings

% total
debt

Out-
standings

% total
debt

Out-
standings

% total
debt

Fixed rate

15,971.5

77.0%

14,055.2

69.0%

12,129.7

66.5%

Floating rate

4,770.6

23.0%

6,322.6

31.0%

6,111.0

33.5%

Gross debt before hedging

20,742.1

100.0%

20,377.8

100.0%

18,240.7

100.0%

Fixed rate

10,808.8

51.3%

9,960.8

48.0%

9,759.2

53.6%

Capped floating rate (active caps)

0.0

0.0%

36.0

0.2%

1,401.7

7.7%

Floating rate

10,276.5

48.7%

10,752.5

51.8%

7,052.1

38.7%

Gross debt after hedging and fair value remeasurement of fixed-rate debt

21,085.3

100.0%

20,749.3

100.0%

18,213.0

100.0%

Fair value adjustments to (asset)/liability hedging derivatives

(343.2)

 

(371.5)

 

27.7

 

Gross debt at amortized cost

20,742.1

 

20,377.8

 

18,240.7

 




F-94



Back to Contents


Total gross debt as of December 31, 2009 after hedging was 51.3% fixed-rate and 48.7% floating-rate. No caps were active as of December 31, 2009. Excluding inactive caps, the fixed-rate portion of gross debt was 57.1% and the floating-rate portion was 42.9%.

As of December 31, 2009, the Group has cash and cash equivalents of €5,614.4 million, the majority of which bears interest at floating rates.

Net debt totals €15,127.7 million and is 69.2% fixed-rate and 30.8% floating-rate.

Sensitivity of the consolidated income statement and equity:

The Group manages its exposure to interest rate fluctuations based on floating-rate gross debt net of cash.

The breakdown of the Group’s floating-rate debt by maturity as of December 31, 2009 is as follows:

(€ million)

Overnight and
less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than
5 years

Total

Total assets (cash and cash equivalents)

5,614.4

 

 

5,614.4

Total floating-rate liabilities

(3,438.0)

(855.5)

(477.1)

(4,770.6)

Net floating-rate position before hedging

2,176.4

(855.5)

(477.1)

843.8

Derivative instruments(1)

4.2

(2,159.0)

(3,351.1)

(5,505.9)

Net floating-rate position after active management and hedging

2,180.6

(3,014.5)

(3,828.2)

(4,662.1)


(1) Debt hedging financial instruments excluding inactive caps of U.S.$400 million and €952 million.


The analysis of the sensitivity of finance costs to interest rate risk covers financial assets and liabilities and the derivative portfolio as of December 31, 2009. Given the net debt structure of the Group and its derivative portfolio, a change in interest rates would impact the income statement via the cost of floating-rate debt (after hedging), the fair value of trading derivatives and Group investments.

The analysis of the sensitivity of equity to interest rate risk concerns the cash flow hedge reserve. This sensitivity corresponds to fair market value movements as a result of an instantaneous change in interest rates.

Assuming a constant net debt structure and management policy, an increase in interest rates of 0.5% at the balance sheet date would generate an increase in equity of €25 million (before tax) and a decrease in net income (before tax) of €15 million. A decrease in interest rates of 0.5% would have the opposite impact on net income and equity. All other variables have been assumed to be constant for the purpose of this analysis and the change in net income and equity is attributable to the variation in interest rates, all other things being equal.

29.1.2

Management of foreign exchange risk

The Group’s international activities generate significant foreign currency flows.

The Group’s central treasury department manages foreign exchange risk centrally within limits set by the Chief Finance Officer.

Overall exposure to foreign exchange risk and risk management

Foreign exchange risk, as defined in accordance with IFRS 7, mainly results from:

(a)

foreign currency-denominated purchases and sales of goods and services relating to operating activities and the related hedges (e.g. currency forwards). However, these transactions remain minor within the Group (see Note 29.1.2.1);

(b)

foreign currency-denominated financial assets and liabilities, including foreign currency-denominated loans/borrowings and related hedges (e.g. forex swaps) (see Note 29.1.2.2);

(c)

investments in foreign subsidiaries realized through the translation of accounts impacting the translation reserves (see Note 29.1.2.3).



F-95



Back to Contents


Management of foreign exchange transaction risk:

The Group has no significant exposure to foreign exchange transaction risk. The activities of the Group are performed by subsidiaries operating in their own country and their own currency. Exposure to foreign exchange risk is therefore naturally limited.

Management of foreign exchange asset risk:

Financing is secured in the local currency for operations located in foreign countries. In the case of inter-company financing, these credit lines can generate foreign exchange risk. In order to limit the impact of this risk, Veolia Environnement has developed a policy which seeks to back foreign-currency financing and foreign currency derivatives with inter-company receivables denominated in the same currency.

The asset exposure hedging strategy primarily involves hedging certain net foreign investments and ensuring that Group companies do not have a material balance sheet foreign exchange position that could generate significant volatility in foreign exchange gains and losses (IAS 21 / IAS 39).

29.1.2.1.

Translation risk

Considering its international presence, the translation of the income statements of the Group’s foreign subsidiaries is sensitive to exchange rate fluctuations.

The following table summarizes the sensitivity of certain Group consolidated income statement aggregates to a 10% increase or decrease in foreign exchange rates against the euro, with regard to the translation of financial statements of foreign subsidiaries.

 

Contribution to the consolidated financial statements

Sensitivity to an increase or decrease in the main currencies against the euro

(€ million)

EUR

GBP

USD

PLN

CZK

Other currencies

Total

+10%

-10%

Revenue

20,677.4

2,259.3

2,977.4

502.3

1,150.6

6,984.0

34,551.0

(626.3)

689.0

Operating income

1,046.8

330.4

147.8

46.0

173.3

276.9

2,021.2

(63.4)

69.7


29.1.2.2.

Foreign exchange risk with regard to the net finance cost

With many offices worldwide, Veolia organizes financing in local currencies.

The foreign currency debts borne by the parent company, Veolia Environnement SA, are generally hedged using either derivative instruments or assets in the same currency.

The following table shows the exposure to exchange rate fluctuations of the foreign currency net financial debt of the entities that bear the main foreign exchange risks. It also presents the sensitivity of these entities to a 10% increase or decrease in the parities of the corresponding foreign currencies.

 

Net finance cost
Foreign currency exposure
(in millions of local currency)

 

Sensitivity to an increase or decrease in the 4 main currencies against the euro
(€ million)

 

GBP

USD

PLN

CZK

Other currencies
(in euros)

Total translated into euros

+10%

-10%

Veolia Environnement SA

(37.4)

(86.0)

(54.7)

(313.1)

(356.3)

(473.9)

(15.3)

9.8

Other Group subsidiaries

(21.8)

(96.6)

(51.5)

(13.2)

(199.2)

(310.4)

(11.8)

9.7

Total in foreign currency

(59.2)

(182.7)

(106.2)

(326.3)

(555.5)

(784.3)

  

Total translated into euros

(66.2)

(125.8)

(24.5)

(12.3)

(555.5)

(784.3)

(27.1)

19.5




F-96



Back to Contents


29.1.2.3.

Foreign exchange and translation risk in the consolidated statement of financial position

Due to its international presence, the Group’s consolidated statement of financial position is exposed to exchange rate fluctuations. A fluctuation in the euro impacts the translation of subsidiary foreign currency-denominated assets in the consolidated statement of financial position. The main currencies used are the US dollar and the pound sterling.

For its most significant assets, the Group has issued debt in the relevant currencies.

The following table shows the net asset amounts for the main currencies, defined as the asset amount excluding net financial debt.

 

Contribution to the consolidated financial statements

Sensitivity to an increase or decrease in the 2 main currencies against the euro

(€ million)

EUR

USD

GBP

Other currencies

Total

+10%

-10%

Assets excluding net financial debt by currency

13,044

2,710

2,646

6,859

25,259

595

(487)

Net financial debt by currency

8,506

1,595

1,857

3,170

15,128

384

(314)

Net assets by currency

4,538

1,115

789

3,689

10,131

211

(173)


29.1.3

Management of commodity risk

Fuel or electricity prices can be subject to significant fluctuations. Nonetheless, Veolia Environnement’s activities have not been materially affected and should not be materially affected in the future by cost increases or the availability of fuel or other commodities. The long-term contracts entered into by Veolia Environnement generally include price review and/or indexation clauses which enable it to pass on the majority of any increases in commodity or fuel prices to the price of services sold to customers, even if this may be performed with a time delay.

Nonetheless, as part of supply management and cost optimization, certain Group subsidiaries may be required, depending on their activities, to contract forward purchases or sales of commodities and set-up derivatives to fix the cost of commodities supply, where the contracts do not offer adapted protection.

29.1.3.1.

Fuel risks

In the Transportation Division, a “fuel” hedging policy has been implemented in order to control trends in fuel prices. The Group uses firm fuel purchase contracts (deemed for its own use) or derivatives whose characteristics (notional amount, maturity) are defined in line with forecast fuel requirements (based on firm orders or highly probably forecast flows). The majority of these derivatives are swaps used to determine the forward purchase price of fuel.

These derivatives were analyzed in accordance with IAS 39 and classified as hedging instruments (cash flow hedges) (see Note 28).

29.1.3.2.

Coal, gas and electricity risks

The Group has entered into long-term gas, coal, electricity and biomass purchase contracts in order to secure its supplies.

The majority of these commitments are reciprocal; the third parties concerned are obliged to deliver the quantities indicated in these contracts and the Group is obliged to take them.

These contracts are considered to fall outside the scope of IAS 39, except for specific transactions in Germany, where electricity purchase options and sales commitments have been contracted in parallel. These transactions are not eligible for hedging within the meaning of IAS 39 (see Note 36 on off-balance sheet commitments).



F-97



Back to Contents


29.2

Management of equity risk

As of December 31, 2009, Veolia Environnement held 14,731,592 of its own shares, of which 8,591,656 were allocated to external growth operations and 6,139,936 were acquired for allocation to employees under stock option and employee savings plans, with a market value of €340.7 million, based on a share price of €23.125 and a net carrying amount of €452.6 million deducted from equity.

As part of its cash management strategy, Veolia Environnement holds UCITS shares. These UCITS have the characteristics of monetary UCITS and are not subject to equity risk.

29.3

Management of liquidity risk

The operational management of liquidity and financing is managed by the Treasury and Financing Department. This management involves the centralization of major financing in order to optimize liquidity and cash.

The Group secures financing on international bond markets, international private placement markets, the treasury note market and the bank lending market, (see Note 17 “Non-current and current borrowings”).



F-98



Back to Contents


29.3.1

Maturity of financial liabilities

Undiscounted contractual flows of financial liabilities, comprising principal payments and interest flows, are presented below. Market data used are valid as of December 31, 2009:

 

As of December 31, 2009

Maturing in

(€ million)

Net carrying amount

Total contractual flows(1)

Less than
1 year

2 years

3 to
5 years

More than
5 years

Non-current borrowings

17,647.3

17,422.7

 

773.4

5,468.1

11,181.2

o/w bond issues – publicly offered

12,511.8

12,304.1

 

-

3,735.9

8,568.2

o/w bond issues – private placements

299.1

288.7

  

142.9

145.8

Current borrowings

2,983.1

2,983.1

2,983.1

   

Trade payables

5,311.0

5,311.0

5,311.0

   

Other current operating payables

4,933.4

4,933.4

4,933.4

   

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

454.9

454.9

454.9

   

Interest on non-current and current borrowings(2)

  

851.8

823.0

1,952.9

4,019.3

Derivative instruments – Liabilities

224.1

     

o/w interest rate derivatives

76.6

751.6

57.0

57.2

158.1

479.3

Fair value hedges

8.3

85.5

10.9

10.9

30.0

33.7

Cash flow hedges

59.6

640.8

46.0

42.1

118.8

433.9

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

8.7

25.3

0.1

4.2

9.3

11.7

o/w foreign currency derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

86.8

88.0

68.0

0.1

1.4

18.5

Inflows

 

(2,761.8)

(2,755.3)

(1.1)

(5.4)

0.0

Outflows

 

2,849.8

2,823.3

1.2

6.8

18.5

o/w foreign currency derivatives hedging a net investment

17.1

17.1

1.6

  

15.5

Inflows

 

(276.4)

(272.5)

(3.9)

  

Outflows

 

293.5

274.1

3.9

 

15.5

o/w commodity derivatives

43.6

     

Sub-total debts and liabilities

  

14,660.8

1,653.7

7,580.5

15,713.8

Derivative instruments – Assets

(477.5)

     

o/w interest rate derivatives

(355.0)

(1,173.6)

(180.8)

(180.7)

(458.4)

(353.7)

Fair value hedges

(351.5)

(1163.0)

(178.3)

(178.3)

(453.3)

(353.1)

Cash flow hedges

(0.1)

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

(3.5)

(10.6)

(2.5)

(2.4)

(5.1)

(0.6)

o/w foreign currency derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

(45.5)

(42.8)

(26.5)

(3.4)

(8.9)

(4.0)

Inflows

 

(1,182.4)

(995.4)

(53.3)

(102.9)

(30.8)

Outflows

 

1,139.6

968.9

49.9

94.0

26.8

o/w foreign currency derivatives hedging a net investment

(13.1)

(13.1)

(3.0)

  

(10.1)

Inflows

 

(185.1)

(175.0)

  

(10.1)

Outflows

 

172.0

172.0

   

o/w commodity derivatives

(63.9)

     

Sub-total assets

  

(210.3)

(184.1)

(467.3)

(367.8)

Total

  

14,450.5

1,469.6

7,113.2

15,346.0

(1)

debts are presented at the year-end exchange rate

(2)

floating-rate interest is calculated at the year-end interest rate


The average maturity of financial debt is 10 years.



F-99



Back to Contents


29.3.2

Net liquid asset positions

Net liquid assets of the Group as of December 31, 2009 break down as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31,2008

As of
December 31,2007

Veolia Environnement:

   

Undrawn MT syndicated loans *

3,694.6

2,890.3

4,000.0

Undrawn MT credit lines

400.0

575.0

850.0

Undrawn ST credit lines

575.0

350.0

175.0

Cash & cash equivalents

4,091.2

2,283.6

1,550.8

Subsidiaries:

  

 

Cash & cash equivalents

1,523.2

1,566.0

1,564.8

Total liquid assets

10,284.0

7,664.9

8,140.6

Current debts and bank overdrafts and other cash position items

  

 

Current debts

2,983.1

3,219.7

3,805.0

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

454.9

465.7

459.4

Total current debts and bank overdrafts and other cash position items

3,438.0

3,685.4

4,264.4

Total liquid assets net of current debts and bank overdrafts and cash position items

6,846.0

3,979.5

3,876.2


* maturing April 20, 2012.


As of December 31, 2009, Veolia Environnement had total liquid assets of €10.3 billion, including cash and cash equivalents of €5.6 billion.

As of December 31, 2009, cash equivalents were primarily held by Veolia Environnement SA in the amount of €4,049.8 million including non-dynamic monetary UCITS of €3,037.9 million, negotiable debt instruments (bank certificates of deposit and treasury notes with a maturity of less than three months) of €375.2 million, monetary notes of €385.0 million and term deposits of €250.0 million.

Undrawn credit lines as of December 31, 2009 are as follows:

Bank for Reconstruction

Amount in € million

Maturity

NATIXIS

150

March 31, 2012

BNP Paribas

150

March 2, 2012

HSBC

100

June 30, 2011

RBS formerly ABN

100

December 29, 2010

SG

150

December 23, 2010

ABN Amro

125

December 20, 2010

CIC and Development (EBRD) holds minority interests in Group operating entities in Central Europe, primarilyBFCM

100

November 15, 2010

Calyon

100

March 4, 2010

Total

975


The €150 million credit line with BNP Paribas which matured on March 3, 2009 was renewed in the same amount, with a new maturity of March 2, 2012.

The €200 million credit line with Natixis which matured on February 9, 2009 was renewed in the amount of €150 million, with a new maturity of March 31, 2012.

A new credit line of €100 million was negotiated with HSBC, with a maturity of June 30, 2011.

Veolia Environnement may draw on the multi-currency syndicated credit facility and all credit lines at any time.



F-100



Back to Contents


29.3.3

Rating

As of December 31, 2009, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s rated Veolia Environnement SA as follows:

Short-term

Long-term

Outlook

Recent events

Moody’s

P-2

A3

Negative

On March 26, 2009, Moody’s confirmed the Energy Services and Transportation Divisions. In 2006, the EBRD subscribedratings assigned to a reserved share capital increase in the amount of €60 million, performed by a Central European subsidiary in the Transportation Division.


Compensation of Executive Committee members and directors


Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

The following table presents the total gross compensation (fixed and variable compensation, directors’ fees and employee benefits) paid to Henri Proglio during 2004, 2005 and 2006.


(in €)

Compensation

Directors fees’ paid by controlled companies

Benefits in

kind(4)

Total gross compensation

Fixed

Variable

VE directors’ fees

Compensation paid in 2004

900,000

473,620(1)

24,517

70,395

3,898

1,472,430

Compensation paid in 2005

944,996

850,000(2)

34,000

70,912

2,616

1,902,524

Compensation paid in 2006

944,996

1,062,500(3)

38,250

66,382

2,666

2,114,794

(1) - Variable compensation paid in 2004 in respect of 2003.

(2) - Variable compensation paid in 2005 in respect of 2004.

(3) - Variable compensation paid in 2006 in respect of 2005.

(4) - Provision for a company car.

He is a member of the supplementary defined contribution collective pension plan for Group Executive Management and of the Executive Committee supplementary defined benefit collective pension plan set up in 2006.


Directors  (excluding the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer)

Directors’ gross fees paid in 2006 totaled €652,995.






Back to contents



Executive Committee members  compensation (excluding the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer)


(in €)

Fixed compensation

Variable compensation

Total compensation

Compensation paid in 2004

2,280,000

1,048,800(1)

3,328,800

Compensation paid in 2005

2,393,989

1,539,360(2)

3,933,349

Compensation paid in 2006

2,431,494

1,950,000(3)

4,381,494

(1)

Including variable compensation paid in 2004 in respect of 2003.

(2)

Including variable compensation paid in 2005 in respect of 2004.

(3)

Including variable compensation paid in 2006 in respect of 2005.

Profit sharing compensation, not included in the amounts described above, amount to €36,000.

Members of the Company's Executive Committee also received, in respect of their duties in Veolia Environnement Group companies, in Franceon June 27, 2005, but downgraded the outlook from stable to negative.

Standard and abroad, total directors' fees of €201,065Poor’s


A-2

Share purchaseBBB+

Negative

On March 25, 2009, Standard and subscription options

Share purchase or subscription options grantedPoor’s confirmed the ratings assigned to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in 2006: 150,000.  Options exercised during the year: nil.


Share purchase or subscription options granted to Executive Committee members in 2006: 390,000.  Options exercised during the year: 296,514



Relations with investments accounted for using the proportionate consolidation method


Veolia Environnement granted a loan of €629 millionon October 3, 2005, but downgraded the outlook from stable to Dalkia International, proportionately consolidatednegative. On January 4, 2010, these ratings were confirmed by Dalkia at 75.79%. This loan has an impact of €153 million on the consolidated financial statements.Standard and Poor’s.


As part of the refinancing of the Berlin water services company acquisition debt, Veolia Environnement guaranteed in the amount of €675 million the debts issued by RVB, proportionately consolidated at 50%.



Note 44

Consolidated employees

Consolidated employees * break down


29.3.4

Information on early debt repayment clauses

Debt of Veolia Environnement SA:

Bank financing:

The legal documentation for syndicated loans (particularly the syndicated loan of €4 billion) and bilateral credit lines contracted by Veolia Environnement SA does not contain any financial covenants, i.e. obligations to comply with a debt payout ratio or interest ratio or a minimum credit rating which, in the event of non-compliance, could lead to the early repayment of the relevant financing.

Bond financing:

The private placement performed in the United States in 2003 (outstanding of €299.1 million as of December 31, 2009) is the only source of bond financing that contains financial covenants (debt hedging ratio < 5.3 and interest hedging ratio > 3.2). These covenants were complied with as of December 31, 2009

The legal documentation for the notes issued by the Company under its EMTN program (outstanding of €11.2 billion as of December 31, 2009) does not contain any financial covenants.

Debt of subsidiaries:

The project financing borne by specific companies or the financing granted by multilateral development banks to the Group’s subsidiaries may contain financial covenants.

As of December 31, 2009, the financing agreements containing such covenants and amounting to more than €100 million (Group share) were as follows:

Financing
(€ million)

By category

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2004

Executives

26,705

24,523

25,350

Employees

233,383

217,104

210,171

Consolidated employees

260,088

241,627

235,521


*

Consolidated employees is equal to the average number of full-time equivalent employees. Employees of proportionately consolidated companies are included in the percentage of consolidation. Employees of equity associates are not included.




Back to contents




By Division

As of December
31, 2006

As of December
31, 2005

As of December
31, 2004

Water

65,246

62,599

58,801

Waste Management

78,951

69,012

66,923

Energy Services

42,651

39,429

36,767

Transportation

69,320

66,089

54,726

Proactiva

3,399

4,084

3,755

FCC

-

-

14,148

Other

521

414

401

Consolidated employees

260,088

241,627

235,521



By company

As of December
31, 2006

As of December
31, 2005

Fully consolidated companies

222,634

208,072

Proportionately consolidated companies

37,454

33,555

Consolidated employees

260,088

241,627


The increase in the average number of employees in the Waste Management and Transportation Divisions in 2006 is mainly due to the acquisition of Cleanaway (2006 average employees = 6,492) and SNCM (2006 average employees = 1,334).



Note 45

Greenhouse gas emission rights

The rise in greenhouse gases in the atmosphere led certain States and the international community to introduce regulatory provisions to limit further increases. At an international level, the Kyoto protocol, finalized in 1997, came into effect in February 2005. At a European level, the European Union decided to implement, via Directive 2003/87/EC of October 13, 2003, a trading system for carbon gas emission allowances. This trading system came into effect at the beginning of 2005.


Within this framework, the Group was granted greenhouse gasemission allowances by the different States of the European Union for the three-year period 2005-2007, known as phase 1. Group allowances granted, sold or consumed during 2006 break down as follows:


Volume in thousands of metric tons

As of January 1, 2006

Granted

Purchased / sold

Consumed

As of December 31, 2006

Total

1,334

15,399

(3,358)

(12,388)

987

Group purchase and sale transactions form part of the normal activities of subsidiaries ("Own Use").

The Group entered into a swap contract, the terms and conditions of which are detailed in Note 32 (C) c-2, in respect of available allowances at the end of 2006.

Based on expected future greenhouse gas emissions, the Group does not expect to be in an overall negative position in 2007.

Based on a market price of €6.48Outstanding as of December 31, 2006, excess emission allowances after consumption2009

Type of 987 thousand metric tonscovenant

Aquiris (Water Division - Belgium)

179.1

DPR1 and deadline for obtaining final acceptance for the plant

Delfluent (Water Division – Netherlands)

112.4

DPR, forecast DPR and duration of greenhouse gas can be value at €6.5 million, before any retrocession decisions to be taken with customers.financing

Shenzhen (Water Division – China)

100.9

Minimum reserve account

Redal (Water Division - Morocco)

103.6

Working capital, equity/share capital and DPR



Note 46

Segment reporting

Pursuant to IAS 14, Veolia Environnement provides primary information by business segment and secondary information by geographical area. The business segments are Water, Waste Management, Energy Services and Transportation.

TheWater segment integrates drinking water and wastewater activities such as water distribution, water and wastewater treatment, industrial process water, manufacturing of water treatment equipment and systems.

TheWaste Management segment collects, processes and disposes of household, trade and industrial waste.

TheEnergy Services segment includes heating production and distribution, energy optimization and related services, and electricity production.

TheTransportation segment focuses onDPR (Debt Payout Ratio) = Net financial debt ratio/EBITDA for which the operation of passenger transportation services.





Back to contents



Business segments


Revenue by segment

(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31,2005 adjusted

Year ended December 31,2004 adjusted

Water

10,087.6

9,134.2

7,976.9

Waste Management

7,462.9

6,748.7

6,380.6

Energy Services

6,118.4

5,463.6

4,974.9

Transportation

4,951.5

4,223.9

3,460.0

Revenue as per consolidated income statement

28,620.4

25,570.4

22,792.4


Inter-segment revenue

(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31,2005 adjusted

Year ended December 31,2004 adjusted

Water

19.4

10.0

6.7

Waste Management

68.4

55.9

42.3

Energy Services

36.2

29.7

28.4

Transportation

5.9

5.1

5.0

Inter-segment revenue

129.9

100.7

82.4



Operating income by segment

(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31,2005 adjusted

Year ended December 31,2004 adjusted

Water

1,160.6

1,002.3

798.6

Waste Management

648.3

543.6

480.6

Energy Services

377.7

315.3

239.6

Transportation

13.6

116.8

38.9

Total business segments

2,200.2

1,978.0

1,557.7

Unallocated operating income

(67.3)

(85.1)

(68.1)

Operating income as per consolidated income statement

2,132.9

1,892.9

1,489.6


Net charge to operating depreciation, amortization and provisions by segment

(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31,2005 adjusted

Year ended December 31,2004 adjusted

Water

(436.3)

(420.9)

(578.1)

Waste Management

(529.4)

(496.4)

(546.6)

Energy Services

(122.9)

(155.4)

(175.7)

Transportation

(293.2)

(160.4)

(177.3)

Total business segments

(1,381.8)

(1,233.1)

(1,477.7)

Unallocated net charge to operating depreciation, amortization and provisions

(28.0)

(59.4)

(32.4)

Net charge to operating depreciation, amortization and provisions

(1,409.8)

(1,292.5)

(1,510.1)



Impairment losses by segment as of December
31, 2006

(€ millions)

Water

Waste Manage-ment

Energy Services

Transport-ation

Unallocated amounts

Total

Impairment losses recognized in equity

-

-

-

-

-

-

Reversals of impairment losses recognized in equity

-

-

-

-

-

-

Equity impact

-

-

-

-

-

-

Impairment losses recognized in net income

(107.6)

(38.8)

(34.1)

(81.6)

(7.2)

(269.3)

Reversals of impairment losses recognized in net income

74.0

38.7

44.8

8.3

5.5

171.3

Net income impact

(33.6)

(0.1)

10.7

(73.3)

(1.7)

(98.0)






Back to contents






Impairment losses by segment as of December 31, 2005, adjusted

(€ millions)

Water

Waste Manage-ment

Energy Services

Transport-ation

Unallocated amounts

Total

Impairment losses recognized in equity

-

-

-

-

-

-

Reversals of impairment losses recognized in equity

-

-

-

-

-

-

Equity impact

-

-

-

-

-

-

Impairment losses recognized in net income

(107.5)

(45.4)

(63.9)

(6.0)

(11.6)

(234.4)

Reversals of impairment losses recognized in net income

90.9

42.2

39.5

5.1

6.8

184.5

Net income impact

(16.6)

(3.2)

(24.4)

(0.9)

(4.8)

(49.9)



Impairment losses by segment as of December 31, 2004, adjusted

(€ millions)

Water

Waste Manage-ment

Energy Services

Transport-ation

Unallocated amounts

Total

Impairment losses recognized in equity

-

-

-

-

-

-

Reversals of impairment losses recognized in equity

-

-

-

-

-

-

Equity impact

-

-

-

-

-

-

Impairment losses recognized in net income

(103.1)

(34.7)

(41.2)

(74.1)

(10.1)

(263.2)

Reversals of impairment losses recognized in net income

105.2

40.8

31.1

4.8

5.5

187.4

Net income impact

2.1

6.1

(10.1)

(69.3)

(4.6)

(75.8)


Share of net income of associates by segment

(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31,2005 adjusted

Year ended December 31,2004 adjusted

Water

3.4

2.4

4.5

Waste Management

(3.8)

1.6

9.8

Energy Services

2.6

1.9

4.2

Transportation

3.8

0.6

(1.5)

Total business segments

6.0

6.5

17.0

Unallocated share of net income of associates

-

-

5.0

Share of net income of associates as per consolidated income statement

6.0

6.5

22.0



Assets by segment as of December 31, 2006

(€ millions)

Water

Waste Manage-ment

Energy Services

Transport-ation

Unallocated amounts

Total assets in the consolidated balance sheet

Goodwill, net

2,029.3

2,294.0

839.2

543.2

(0.7)

5,705.0

Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, net

5,142.5

3,492.1

1,309.5

1,570.0

130.0

11,644.1

Operating financial assets

3,830.5

737.0

771.1

115.4

5.6

5,459.6

Working capital assets included DTA

5,260.3

2,670.9

3,357.7

1,213.2

554.1

13,056.2

Total segment assets

16,262.6

9,194.0

6,277.5

3,441.8

689.0

35,864.9

Investments in associates

130.7

44.4

19.6

46.3

-

241.0

Other unallocated assets

    

4,017.8*

4,017.8

Total assets

16,393.3

9,238.4

6,297.1

3,488.1

4,706.8

40,123.7


* Including €67.3 million of Non-current assets held for sale)Veolia Transportation for €41.3 million and Waste Management for €25.0 million).




Back to contents




Assets by segment as of December 31, 2005, adjusted

(€ millions)

Water

Waste Manage-ment

Energy Services

Transport-ation

Unallocated amounts

Total assets in the consolidated balance sheet

Goodwill, net

1,942.5

1,527.7

836.3

446.7

(0.9)

4,752.3

Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, net

4,699.0

3,157.7

1,171.5

1,121.0

109.7

10,258.9

Operating financial assets

3,863.3

749.2

822.1

104.4

6.4

5,545.4

Working capital assets included DTA

5,181.4

2,298.1

3,137.6

993.5

243.6

11,854.2

Total segment assets

15,686.2

7,732.7

5,967.5

2,665.6

358.8

32,410.8

Investments in associates

131.4

53.8

10.6

5.7

-

201.5

Other unallocated assets

    

3,768.7*

3,768.7

Total assets

15,817.6

7,786.5

5,978.1

2,671.3

4,127.5

36,381.0

* Including €1.6 million of Non-current assets held for sale (Waste Management).


Assets by segment as of December 31, 2004, adjusted

(€ millions)

Water

Waste Manage-ment

Energy Services

Transport-ation

Unallocated amounts

Total assets in the consolidated balance sheet

Goodwill, net

1,725.4

1,359.4

762.9

302.2

96.9

4,246.8

Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, net

4,053.0

2,818.5

1,029.0

1,034.5

40.9

8,975.9

Operating financial assets

3,525.7

638.6

839.9

96.3

5.4

5,105.9

Working capital assets included DTA

4,252.4

2,136.7

2,853.1

809.5

626.7

10,678.4

Total segment assets

13,556.5

6,953.2

5,484.9

2,242.5

769.9

29,007.0

Investments in associates

123.4

59.9

10.4

4.9

20.6

219.2

Other unallocated assets

    

6,673.1*

6,673.1

Total assets

13,679.9

7,013.1

5,495.3

2,247.4

7,463.6

35,899.3

* Including €30.2 million of Non-current assets held for sale (Veolia Transportation for €26.2 million and Waste Management for €4 million).


Liabilities by segment as of December 31, 2006

(€ millions)

Water

Waste Manage-ment

Energy Services

Transport-ation

Unallocated amounts

Total liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet

Provisions for contingencies and losses

1,012.4

791.3

464.0

611.9

142.9

3,022.5

Working capital liabilities included DTA

6,238.8

2,548.9

2,524.1

1,361.0

100.7

12,773.5

Other segment liabilities

273.4

41.6

29.1

12.2

(3.1)

353.2

Total segment liabilities

7,524.6

3,381.8

3,017.2

1,985.1

240.5

16,149.2

Other unallocated liabilities

    

23,974.5*

23,974.5

Total liabilities

7,524.6

3,381.8

3,017.2

1,985.1

24,215.0

40,123.7


* Including €59.4 million of Non-current liabilities held for sale (Veolia Transportation).


Liabilities by segment as of December 31, 2005, adjusted

(€ millions)

Water

Waste Manage-ment

Energy Services

Transport-ation

Unallocated amounts

Total liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet

Provisions for contingencies and losses

1,059.0

575.7

476.1

164.0

127.2

2,402.0

Working capital liabilities included DTA

5,849.4

2,084.3

2,373.2

1,161.4

106.5

11,574.8

Other segment liabilities

289.0

36.9

25.1

8.5

(1.2)

358.3

Total segment liabilities

7,197.4

2,696.9

2,874.4

1,333.9

232.5

14,335.1

Other unallocated liabilities

    

22,045.9

22,045.9

Total liabilities

7,197.4

2,696.9

2,874.4

1,333.9

22,278.4

36,381.0


Liabilities by segment as of December 31, 2004, adjusted

(€ millions)

Water

Waste Manage-ment

Energy Services

Transport-ation

Unallocated amounts

Total liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet

Provisions for contingencies and losses

886.6

518.1

401.6

125.1

77.3

2,008.7

Working capital liabilities included DTA

5,267.1

1,920.3

2,143.7

1,018.9

160.3

10,510.3

Other segment liabilities

191.3

37.4

37.2

4.9

82.8

353.6

Total segment liabilities

6,345.0

2,475.8

2,582.5

1,148.9

320.4

12,872.6

Other unallocated liabilities

    

23,026.7(*)

23,026.7

Total liabilities

6,345.0

2,475.8

2,582.5

1,148.9

23,347.1

35,899.3

* Including €4.5 million of Non-current liabilities held for sale (Veolia Transportation).




Back to contents





Capital expenditure by segment

(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31,2005 adjusted

Year ended December 31,2004 adjusted

Water

853

771

748

Waste Management

692

639

600

Energy Services

318

252

239

Transportation

302

193

143

Total segment capital expenditure

2,165

1,855

1,730


Geographical area


Geographical breakdown of Revenue


Year ended December 31, 2006

(€ millions)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Oceania

Asia

Rest of the world

Total

Water

4,802.4

1,282.6

552.2

1,279.4

640.8

123.9

578.9

827.4

10,087.6

Waste Management

3,112.1

151.7

1,135.4

817.2

1,354.2

402.9

167.0

322.4

7,462.9

Energy Services

3,535.4

62.5

426.2

1,899.9

10.3

-

25.0

159.1

6,118.4

Transportation

1,953.1

496.1

73.0

1,321.4

645.0

404.6

-

58.3

4,951.5

Revenue

13,403.0

1,992.9

2,186.8

5,317.9

2,650.3

931.4

770.9

1,367.2

28,620.4


Year ended December 31,2005 adjusted

(€ millions)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Oceania

Asia

Rest of the world

Total

Water

4,459.4

1,204.5

463.9

1,110.9

581.8

100.5

433.7

779.5

9,134.2

Waste Management

2,990.1

144.6

861.9

699.9

1,216.4

383.9

146.9

305.0

6,748.7

Energy Services

3,256.5

66.4

367.5

1,657.9

5.0

-

16.7

93.6

5,463.6

Transportation

1,733.2

401.8

33.8

1,239.9

380.1

393.6

-

41.5

4,223.9

Revenue

12,439.2

1,817.3

1,727.1

4,708.6

2,183.3

878.0

597.3

1,219.6

25,570.4


Year ended December 31,2004 adjusted

(€ millions)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Oceania

Asia

Rest of the world

Total

Water

4,204.9

766.1

412.5

953.4

497.4

77.4

355.1

710.1

7,976.9

Waste Management

2,883.5

141.6

852.8

663.4

1,122.0

307.4

139.0

270.9

6,380.6

Energy Services

3,043.1

70.6

335.6

1,465.9

0.1

-

11.5

48.1

4,974.9

Transportation

1,475.9

363.0

28.3

1,048.7

263.7

259.2

-

21.2

3,460.0

Revenue

11,607.4

1,341.3

1,629.2

4,131.4

1,883.2

644.0

505.6

1,050.3

22,792.4


Geographical breakdown of segment assets


As of December 31, 2006

(€ millions)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Rest of the world

Total

Water

5,145.0

4,427.0

1,706.3

1,769.6

583.3

2,631.4

16,262.6

Waste Management

3,212.0

89.7

2,503.9

828.5

1,834.1

725.8

9,194.0

Energy Services

3,608.2

87.2

192.2

2,246.5

7.4

136.0

6,277.5

Transportation

1,640.3

348.5

96.6

774.2

354.4

227.8

3,441.8

Segment assets

13,605.5

4,952.4

4,499.0

5,618.8

2,779.2

3,721.0

35,175.9





Back to contents




As of December 31,2005 adjusted

(€ millions)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Rest of the world

Total

Water

5,137.8

4,430.1

1,574.6

1,429.3

831.8

2,282.6

15,686.2

Waste Management

3,006.0

87.7

1,247.9

641.0

1,985.0

765.1

7,732.7

Energy Services

3,596.8

64.0

182.6

2,043.1

6.0

75.0

5,967.5

Transportation

995.2

404.0

15.9

801.3

220.4

228.8

2,665.6

Segment assets

12,735.8

4,985.8

3,021.0

4,914.7

3,043.2

3,351.5

32,052.0


As of December 31,2004 adjusted

(€ millions)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Rest of the world

Total

Water

4,969.9

3,808.8

1,455.8

1,060.6

445.0

1,816.4

13,556.5

Waste Management

2,798.5

82.4

1,127.0

257.8

1,646.8

1,040.7

6,953.2

Energy Services

3,444.9

67.3

153.2

1,786.6

-

32.9

5,484.9

Transportation

882.4

359.0

4.9

748.9

63.4

183.9

2,242.5

Segment assets

12,095.7

4,317.5

2,740.9

3,853.9

2,155.2

3,073.9

28,237.1


Geographical breakdown of capital expenditure


Year ended  December 31, 2006

(€ millions)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Rest of the world

Total

Water

412

25

129

92

11

184

853

Waste Management

285

8

66

88

164

81

692

Energy Services

182

13

6

101

4

12

318

Transportation

132

34

36

76

10

14

302

Capital expenditure

1,011

80

237

357

189

291

2,165


Year ended December 31,2005 adjusted

(€ millions)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Rest of the world

Total

Water

386

40

79

87

17

162

771

Waste Management

271

8

114

61

105

80

639

Energy Services

160

1

9

73

2

7

252

Transportation

87

37

1

51

5

12

193

Capital expenditure

904

86

203

272

129

261

1,855


Year ended December 31,2004 adjusted

(€ millions)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Rest of the world

Total

Water

387

12

61

86

48

154

748

Waste Management

268

8

107

53

89

75

600

Energy Services

137

2

9

87

-

4

239

Transportation

42

25

-

61

12

3

143

Capital expenditure

834

47

177

287

149

236

1,730





Back to contents



Note 47

2004 and 2005 adjusted Income Statements: reconciliation


(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2004

IFRIC 12 adjustments

Year ended December 31, 2004 adjusted for IFRIC 12

IFRS 5

representation

Year ended December 31, 2004 adjusted

 

Revenue

22,500.3

420.2

22,920.5

-128.1

22,792.4

o/w Revenue from operating financial assets

96.7

178.9

275.6

-

275.6

Cost of sales

(18,346.3)

-392.0

-18,738.3

133.5

(18,604.8)

Selling costs

(439.7)

-

-439.7

-

(439.7)

General and administrative expenses

(2,236.4)

6.6

-2,229.8

2.8

(2,227.0)

Other operating revenue and expenses

2.7

-33.9

-31.2

-0.1

(31.3)

Operating income

1,480.6

0.9

1,481.5

8.1

1,489.6

Finance costs

(829.1)

-5.5

-834.6

1.7

(832.9)

Finance income

97.0

-5.2

91.8

-

91.8

Other financial income and expenses

46.1

-1.7

44.4

-

44.4

Income tax expense

(184.1)

5.6

-178.5

3.6

(174.9)

Share of net income of associates

24.2

-

24.2

-2.2

22.0

Net income from continuing operations

634.7

-5.9

628.8

11.2

640.0

Net income from discontinued operations

(26.9)

-

(26.9)

-11.2

(38.1)

Net income for the year

607.8

-5.9

601.9

-

601.9

Minority interests

216.3

-4.2

212.1

-

212.1

Attributable to equity holders of the parent

391.5

-1.7

389.8

-

389.8


(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2005

IFRIC 12 adjustments

Year ended December 31, 2005 adjusted for IFRIC 12

IFRS 5
representation

Year ended December 31, 2005 adjusted

 

Revenue

25,244.9

448.2

25,693.1

-122.7

25,570.4

o/w Revenue from operating financial assets

125.8

200.0

325.8

-

325.8

Cost of sales

(20,561.0)

-435.1

-20,996.1

126.2

(20,869.9)

Selling costs

(478.5)

-

-478.5

-

(478.5)

General and administrative expenses

(2,403.0)

5.4

-2,397.6

2.7

(2,394.9)

Other operating revenue and expenses

90.5

-24.5

66.0

-0.2

65.8

Operating income

1,892.9

-6.0

1,886.9

6.0

1,892.9

Finance costs

(781.7)

6.0

-775.7

1.7

(774.0)

Finance income

68.3

-5.0

63.3

-

63.3

Other financial income and expenses

30.5

-2.4

28.1

-

28.1

Income tax expense

(422.9)

0.5

-422.4

-

(422.4)

Share of net income of associates

14.9

-

14.9

-8.4

6.5

Net income from continuing operations

802.0

-6.9

795.1

-0.7

794.4

Net income from discontinued operations

-

-

-

0.7

0.7

Net income for the year

802.0

-6.9

795.1

-

795.1

Minority interests

179.0

-6.1

172.9

-

172.9

Attributable to equity holders of the parent

623.0

-0.8

622.2

-

622.2




Back to contents



Note 48

2005 adjusted consolidated financial statements: reconciliation

48.1

Summary of the impact of IFRIC 12 on the main financial statement headings


(€ millions)

December 31, 2005

December 31, 2005 adjusted

Difference

Income Statement

   
 

Revenue

25,244.9

25,693.1

448.2

 

Revenue from operating financial assets

125.8

325.8

200.0

 

Operating income

1,892.9

1,886.9

-6.0

 

Net income for the year attributable to equity holders of the parent

623.0

622.2

-0.8

Balance Sheet

   
 

Intangible assets(1)

1,171.5

3,373.2

2,201.7

 

Property, plant and equipment

12,351.5

6,885.7

-5,465.8

 

Operating financial assets

2,065.4

5,545.4

3,480.0

 

Operating receivables

10,112.3

10,083.3

-29.0

 

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

3,802.6

3,790.2

-12.4

 

Equity

5,693.5

5,678.2

-15.3

Cash Flow Statement

   
 

Operating cash flow before changes in working capital

3,687.3

3,541.9

-145.4

 

Changes in working capital

(52.2)

(39.4)

12.8

 

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

(2,081.9)

(1,837.1)

244.8

 

New operating financial assets

(269.3)

(513.4)

-244.1

 

Principal payments on operating financial assets

184.0

320.6

136.6

 

Net debt

(13,870.6)

(13,870.6)

-


(1) Excluding goodwill but including concession intangible assets.


The impact of early adoption of IFRIC 12 was published in the second update (filed September 26, 2006)defined aggregates may vary according to the reference document filed on April 6, 2006 with the AMF.financing

In the second update, adoption was based on the draft interpretation entitled “D12-D13-D14”. The definitive publication of the interpretation led to the correction of certain adjustments reported in the second update. These corrections




F-101



Back to Contents


As of December 31, 2009, the Group complied with all the covenants included in the documentation of these significant financing agreements.

With regard to the Aquiris project (Brussels wastewater treatment plant), the lenders waived their right as of January 29, 2010 to demand early repayment of the financing until June 30, 2010. At the same time, a demand guarantee, exercisable as of June 30, 2010 and maturing on August 31, 2010, was granted by Veolia Eau-CGE to the lenders.

Financing for a project with an outstanding of €81 million as of December 31, 2009 contains a covenant that has yet to be complied with.

29.4

Management of credit risk

The Group is exposed to counterparty risk in various areas: its operating activities, cash investment activities and derivatives.

29.4.1

Counterparty risk relating to operating activities

Credit risk must be considered separately with respect to operating financial assets and operating receivables. Credit risk on operating financial assets is appraised via the rating of primarily public customers. Credit risk on other operating receivables is appraised through an analysis of risk dilution and late payments for private customers and exceptionally, for public customers, by a credit analysis.

Group customer credit risk analysis may be broken down into the following four categories (Public customers - Delegating authority, Private customers - Individuals, Public customers - Other and Private customers - Companies):

  

As of December 31, 2009

Breakdown by customer type

(€ million)

Note

Gross
carrying
amount

Provisions

Net carrying
amount

Public
customers -
Delegating
authority

Private
customers -
Individuals

Public
customers -
Other

Private
customers -
Companies

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,705.0

(53.2)

5,651.8

4,647.3

 

185.6

818.9

Trade receivables

13

9,641.6

(560.3)

9,081.3

2,202.8

1,685.8

1,672.9

3,519.8

Other current operating receivables

13

1,178.0

(76.8)

1,101.2

183.3

318.6

88.3

511.0

Other non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

774.8

(73.5)

701.3

59.0

4.1

19.3

618.9(1)

Current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

195.8

(31.9)

163.9

27.9

5.1

3.8

127.1

Loans and receivables

 

17,495.2

(795.7)

16,699.5

7,120.3

2,013.6

1,969.9

5,595.7

Other non-current financial assets

11

72.8

(20.2)

52.6

3.1

7.1

18.2

24.2

Other current financial assets

11

57.9

(4.1)

53.8

1.9

4.1

0.3

47.5

Total

 

17,625.9

(820.0)

16,805.9

7,125.3

2,024.8

1,988.4

5,667.4



1

Of which Dalkia International and its subsidiaries in the amount of €434.2 million as of December 31, 2008 and €390.8 million as of December 31, 2009.



F-102



Back to Contents


The analysis of Group customer credit risk as of December 31, 2008 is as follows:

  

As of December 31, 2008

Breakdown by customer type

(€ million)

Note

Gross
carrying
amount

Provisions

Net carrying
amount

Public
customers -
Delegating
authority

Private
customers -
Individuals

Public
customers -
Other

Private
customers -
Companies

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,763.8 

(12.6)

5,751.2 

4,834.9

-

54.0

862.3

Trade receivables

13

10,253.0 

(550.9)

9,702.1 

2,228.2

1,877.2

1,776.1

3,820.6

Other current operating receivables

13

1,314.1 

(59.6)

1,254.5 

244.3

312.9

153.1

544.2

Other non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

803.0 

(63.4) 

739.6 

59.9

21.8

28.9

629.0(1)

Current financial assets in loans and receivables

14

283.3 

(27.9) 

255.4 

29.4

4.7

28.6

192.7

Loans and receivables

 

18,417.2 

(714.4) 

17,702.8 

7,396.7

2,216.6

2,040.7

6,048.8

Other non-current financial assets

11

91.5 

(13.8) 

77.7 

23.3

8.1

17.6

28.7

Other current financial assets

14

70.2 

(4.2) 

66.0 

2.0

3.9

26.0

34.1


Given the nature of the Group’s activities and its customers, and notably the ongoing nature of its activities, the Group considers that credit risk is unlikely to have a material impact.



1

Of which Dalkia International and its subsidiaries in the amount of €434.2 million as of December 31, 2008 and €390.8 million as of December 31, 2009.



F-103



Back to Contents


Assets past due and not impaired break down as follows:

  

As of December 31, 2009

Assets past due but not impaired

  

Gross
carrying
amount

Provisions

Net carrying
amount

Assets not
yet due

(€ million)

Note

0-6
months

6 months -
1 year

More
than
1 year

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,705.0

(53.2)

5,651.8

5,623.7

13.7

7.4

7.0

Trade receivables

13

9,941.6

(560.3)

9,081.3

6,765.4

1,631.7

267.3

416.9

Other current operating receivables

13

1,178.0

(76.8)

1,101.2

747.2

87.3

171.3

95.4

Other non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

774.8

(73.5)

701.3

701.3

   

Current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

195.8

(31.9)

163.9

136.4

10.8

5.6

11.1

Loans and receivables

 

17,495.2

(795.7)

16,699.5

13,974.0

1,743.5

451.6

530.4

Other non-current financial assets

11

72.8

(20.2)

52.6

52.6

   

Other current financial assets

11

57.9

(4.1)

53.8

48.2

 

1.9

3.7


Assets past due over 6 months and not impaired (€987.6 million) mainly consist of trade receivables. They declined by 11.2% compared to fiscal 2008.

Payment delays in excess of 6 months are mainly concentrated in two countries where settlement periods are exceptionally long:

In Italy, the net “trade receivables” account for all Group subsidiaries is €247.2 million as of December 31, 2009, for receivables past due over 6 months. This period is due to settlement practices in this country. Furthermore, in Italy, trade receivables primarily consist of a multitude of user/private customers for which the credit risk is highly diluted and local authorities and state bodies for which the recovery period is long.

In Morocco, the net “trade receivables” account is €39.6 million as of December 31, 2009, compared to €73.3 million as of December 31, 2008, for receivables past due over 6 months. This decrease was mainly attributable to the change in consolidated method (from full to proportionate consolidation) for the Water division’s activity in North Africa and the Middle East.

Finally, in France, net trade receivables past due over 6 months total €196.7 million at the end of 2009 (€262.1 million at the end of 2008) representing 4.2% of customer outstandings (including €109.8 million past due over one year), the majority of which concern amounts invoiced on behalf of local authorities and public bodies, receivables on local authorities and public bodies and VAT.



F-104



Back to Contents


Financial assets maturity schedule as of December 31, 2008.

  

As of December 31,2008

Assets past due but not impaired

  

Gross carrying amount

Provisions

Net carrying amount

Assets not yet due

(€ million)

Note

0-6 months

6 months - 1 year

More than 1 year

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,763.8 

(12.6) 

5,751.2 

5,738.4

7.2

5.6

-

Trade receivables

13

10,253.0 

(550.9) 

9,702.1 

6,649.7

2,258.2

387.4

406.8

Other current operating receivables

13

1,314.1 

(59.6) 

1,254.5 

819.5

162.5

162.1

110.4

Other non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

803.0 

(63.4)

739.6 

739.6

 -

 -

 -

Current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

283.3 

(27.9) 

255.4 

188.6

45.2

12.3

9.3

Loans and receivables

 

18,417.2 

(714.4) 

17,702.8 

14,135.8

2,473.1

567.4

526.5

Other non-current financial assets

11

91.5 

(13.8) 

77.7 

77.7

 -

 -

 -

Other current financial assets

11

70.2 

(4.2) 

66.0 

17.7

30.5

3.9

13.9


Financial assets maturity schedule as of December 31, 2007:

  

As of December 31, 2007

Assets past due but not impaired

  

Gross carrying amount

Provisions

Net carrying amount

Assets not yet due

(€ million)

Note

0-6 months

6 months - 1 year

More than 1 year

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,633.6

(6.0)

5,627.6

5,624.4

2.5

0.7

-

Trade receivables

13

9,813.7

(510.0)

9,303.7

6,335.5

2,305.0

309.7

353.5

Other current operating receivables

13

1,508.1

(75.1)

1,433.0

784.0

451.5

134.1

63.4

Other non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

572.6

(57.6)

515.0

515.0

-

-

-

Current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

174.1

(21.3)

152.8

123.3

15.7

6.2

7.6

Loans and receivables

 

17,702.1

(670.0)

17,032.1

13,382.2

2,774.7

450.7

424.5

Other non-current financial assets

11

231.0

-

231.0

231.0

-

-

-

Other current financial assets

11

177.2

-

177.2

177.2

-

-

-


29.4.2

Counterparty risk relating to investment and hedging activities

The Group is exposed to credit risk relating to the investment of its surplus cash and its use of derivative instruments in order to manage interest rate and currency risk. Credit risk corresponds to the loss that the Group may incur should a counterparty default on its contractual obligations. In the case of derivative financial instruments, this risk corresponds to the fair value of all the instruments contracted with a counterparty insofar as this value is positive.

The Group minimizes counterparty risk through internal control procedures limiting the choice of counterparties to leading banks and financial institutions (banks and financial institutions with a minimum Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s or Fitch’s rating of A1/P1/F1 respectively for transactions with a term of less than one year and of A2/A/A respectively for transactions with a term of more than one year). Limits are determined for each counterparty based primarily on the rating awarded by the rating agencies and the size of their equity, and are reviewed monthly. In addition, derivative transactions are only entered into with counterparties with whom the Group has an ISDA or FBF framework agreement.



F-105



Back to Contents


Deposit counterparty risk is managed by the Treasury and Financing Department which centralizes the cash positions of Group entities. In this way, the counterparty risk of entities is limited to settlement and account keeping banking activities, signature commitments and the continuation of credit lines obtained from banks with the authorization of the Group Treasury and Financing Department.

Counterparty risk on financial transactions is monitored on an ongoing basis by the middle-office. The Group is not exposed to any risk as a result of material concentration.

As of December 31, 2009, Veolia Environnement SA’s total outstandings exposed to credit risk amounted to €4,049.8 million with regard to investments and €272 million with regard to derivative instruments (sum of the fair values of assets and liabilities). These counterparties are investment grade for up to 97% of the total exposure.

Veolia Environnement SA cash surpluses (€4.05 billion as of December 31, 2009) are managed with a profitability objective close to that of the money market and avoiding exposure to capital risk and maintaining a low level of volatility.

They were injected into the following types of investment:

non-dynamic monetary UCITS (with the AMF Euro Monetary classification) for €3,038 million,

certificates of deposit and term deposits with a maturity of less than three months with leading French banks with a rating from Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s or Fitch: A1+/P1/F1 in the short term for €350 million,

negotiable debt securities with a maturity of less than three months issued by CAC40 or Eurostoxx 50 companies for €275 million,

monetary notes issued by leading French banks with a rating from Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s or Fitch: A1+/P1/F1 in the short term for €385 million.

NOTE 30

Employee benefit obligation

Share-based compensation

Veolia Environnement share purchase and subscription option plans

Veolia Environnement has implemented several standard fixed share purchase and subscription option plans, as well as a variable plan for management.

Outstanding option plans at the end of 2009 were as follows:

 

N°7

N°6

N°5

N°4

N°3

N°2

 

2007

2006

2004

2003

2002

2001

Grant date

07/17/2007

03/28/2006

12/24/2004

03/24/2003

01/28/2002

02/08/2001

Number of options granted

2,490,400

4,044,900

3,341,600

5,192,635

4,413,000

3,462,000

Number of options not exercised

635,850 (*)

3,709,861

3,080,738

1,571,010

1,929,114

0

Plan term

8 years

8 years

8 years

8 years

8 years

8 years

Vesting conditions

4 years service plus performance conditions to be satisfied

4 years service

3 years service plus performance conditions for certain plans

3 years service

3 years service

3 years service

Vesting method

After 4 years

After 4 years

By tranches of 1/3 over 3 years

By tranches of 1/3 over 3 years

By tranches of 1/3 over 3 years

After 3 years

Strike price
(in euros)

57.05

44.03**

24.32**

22.14**

36.65**

40.59**


*

Given the performance criteria, the number of options effectively exercisable has been reduced from 1,742,650 in 2008.

**

Strike price adjusted to take account of transactions impacting the share capital of the Company (issue of share subscription warrants on December 17, 2001 and share capital increases with retention of preferential subscription rights on August 2, 2002 and July 10, 2008). To recap, the initial strike prices for plans no. 2, no. 3, no. 4, no. 5 and no. 6 were €42.00, €37.53, €22.50, €24.72 and €44.75 respectively.



F-106



Back to Contents


2008 and 2009:

The Group did not grant any share options in 2008 or 2009.

2007:

In 2007, the Group granted 2,490,400 share options to two employee groups. The first group comprises Veolia Environnement Group management, including members of the Executive Committee. The second group comprises senior managers of Veolia Environnement Group companies and employees recognized for their excellent performance in 2006. The estimated fair value of each option granted in 2007 was €13,91. This value was calculated using the Black and Scholes model based on the following underlying assumptions: share price of €57.26, historical volatility of 21.75%, expected dividend yield of 2%, risk-free interest rate of 4.59%, estimated exercise maturity of 6 years.

In 2007, the Group granted 333,700 Free Shares to employees recognized for their excellent performance in 2006. In France, rights vest after two years, followed by a two year lock-in period and are subject to performance conditions. Outside France, rights vest after four years subject to performance conditions. The estimated fair value of each free share granted in 2007 was €57.26, net of dividends not received during the vesting period and, for shares granted to French employees, a discount for non-transferability.

Finally, in 2007, the Group granted 205,200 Stock Appreciation Rights (SAR) to ordinary shares to three groups of employees: firstly, Veolia Environnement Group management, secondly senior managers of Veolia Environnement Group companies and thirdly employees recognized for their excellent performance in 2006. Rights vest after four years subject to performance conditions. As of December 31, 2009, the estimated fair value of each option granted in 2007 is €0.195. This value was calculated using the Black and Scholes model based on the following underlying assumptions: share price of €22.52, historical volatility of 33.24%, expected dividend yield of 5.35%, risk-free interest rate of 1.99%, estimated exercise maturity of 3 years, subscription price of €57.20.

The number of options granted under the three 2007 plans (share options, free shares and SAR) was determined based on the increase in net earnings per share between December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2008. This has been taken into account in the calculation of the number of options vested and the compensation expense.

2006:

In 2006, the Group granted 4,044,900 share options to three employee groups. The first group comprises Veolia Environnement Group management, including members of the Executive Committee. The second group comprises senior management of Veolia Environnement Group companies. The third group comprises Group employees recognized for their excellent performance. The estimated fair value of each option granted in 2006 was €10.01. This value was calculated using the Black and Scholes model based on the following underlying assumptions: share price of €44.75, historical volatility of 22.6%, expected dividend yield of 1.92%, risk-free interest rate of 3.69%, estimated exercise maturity of 6 years.

Information on share purchase and subscription options granted since 2001 is detailed below, with a breakdown of movements in 2007, 2008 and 2009 (share option plans excluding SAR plans and free share plans):

 

Number of shares outstanding

 

Weighted average strike price (in € )

As of December 31, 2006

16,800,258

 

33.67

Granted

2,490,400

 

57.05

Adjustment for share capital increase of July 10, 2007

228,525

 

33.79

Exercised

(4,046,076)

 

30.20

Cancelled

(51,934)

 

49.70

Expired

-

 

-

As of December 31, 2007

15,421,173

 

37.71

Granted

-

 

-

Exercised

(886,095)

 

28.36

Cancelled

(242,056)

 

46.78

Expired

(1,804,495)*

 

56.17

As of December 31, 2008

12,488,527

 

35.53

Granted

   

Exercised

(31,011)

 

25.06

Cancelled

(148,418)

 

46.05

Expired

(1,382,525)

 

40.59

As of December 31, 2009

10,926,573

 

34.78

* including 1,742,650 shares due to failure to meet performance conditions




F-107



Back to Contents


The average share price at the time of option exercise in 2009 was €24.21.

Details of Veolia Environnement share purchase and subscription options outstanding as of December 31, 2009 are as follows:

Strike price

Number of options outstanding

 

Average strike price

(in euros)

 

Average residual term

(in years)

 

Number of options vested

20-25

4,651,748

 

23.58

 

2.39

 

4,651,748

35-40

1,929,114

 

36.65

 

0.08

 

1,929,114

40-45

3,709,861

 

44.03

 

4.24

 

0

55-60

635,850

 

57.05

 

5.54

 

0

 

10,926,573

 

34.78

 

3.40

 

6,580,862


As of December 31, 2009, 6,580,862 can be exercised.

Employees’ savings plans

Veolia Environnement has set-up standard and leveraged savings plans which enable a large number of employees of Veolia Environnement and its subsidiaries to subscribe for Veolia Environnement shares. Shares subscribed by employees under these plans are subject to certain restrictions regarding their sale or transfer by employees.

Veolia Environnement did not introduce any new employee savings plans in 2008.

Shares subscribed by Veolia Environnement employees in 2007 and 2009:


 

2009

2007

Number of shares

624,387

1,415,163

Subscription price

€21.28

€48.37 (*)

Amount subscribed (€ million)

13.3

68.5


(*)

 weighted average price - 1,392,857 shares were subscribed at €48.18 and 22,306 were subscribed at €60.23 (leveraged formula with the grant of share subscription warrants in Germany and leveraged formula with the grant of SAR in Australia, Canada, South Korea, Portugal and Sweden).


In 2009, in the absence of a discount for plan subscribers, the expense recognized for the savings plan totaled €5.1 million and corresponds to the contribution valued as of July 3, the transaction closing date, less a non-transferability discount for the standard plan of €915,000.

In 2007, a compensation expense of €49.7 million was recorded in accordance with IFRS 2 on share-based payments. This compensation includes a discount for non-transferability of €7.2 million.

Veolia Group applies the recommendations of the CNC (communiqué of December 21, 2004 on Group Savings Plans and supplementary notice of February 2, 2007). The discount for non-transferability was determined by calculating the difference between the value of a five-year forward sale of shares and the spot purchase of the same number of shares, financed by a loan. The risk-free interest rate and the interest rate for calculating the carrying cost were 4.05% and 6.74% in 2007 and 2.76% and 6.90% in 2009. The notional cost of non-transferability of shares as a percentage of the spot rate of the shares at the grant date was 12% in 2007 and 17.9% in 2009.



F-108



Back to Contents


Pension plans and other post-employment benefits

a - Description of plans

In accordance with the regulatory environment and collective agreements, the Group has established defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans (company or multi-employer) in favor of employees and other post-employment benefits.

In certain subsidiaries, supplementary defined contribution plans were set up. Expenses incurred by the Group under these plans total €91 million for 2009 and €89 million for 2008.

Certain Group companies have established defined benefit pension plans and/or offer other post-employment benefits (mainly retirement termination payments). The largest defined benefit pension plans are located in the United Kingdom, with a pension obligation as of December 31, 2009 of €988 million (and plan assets of €857 million) and in France with a pension obligation as of December 31, 2009 of €478 million (and plan assets of €127 million), notably in respect of retirement termination payments.

Under collective agreements, certain Group companies participate in multi-employer defined benefit pension plans. However, as these plans are unable to provide a consistent and reliable basis for the allocation of the obligation, assets and costs between the different participating entities, they are recorded as defined contribution plans in accordance with IAS 19. The main multi-employer plans are located in Sweden, Germany and the Netherlands and concern approximately 11,500 employees. The corresponding expense recorded in the consolidated income statement is equal to annual contributions and totals slightly over €29 million in 2009 compared to €32 million in 2008. Multi-employer plans in Sweden and the Netherlands are funded by capitalization; German multi-employer plans are funded by redistribution.

The Group also offers post-employment benefits and notably health insurance plans in the United States and France.

b-

Obligations in respect of defined benefit pension plans and other post-employment benefits

The following schedules present obligations in respect of defined benefit pension plans and other post-employment benefits

NB: these schedules exclude, by definition, defined contribution pension plans (as the obligation is limited to the annual contribution expensed in the year and the plans do not, therefore, result in the recording of a provision based on actuarial valuations) and multi-employer defined benefit pension plans which are accounted for as defined contribution pension plans.



F-109



Back to Contents


b-1 Change in the defined benefit obligation (D.B.O)

 

As of December 31,

(€ million)

Pension plans and other post-employment benefits

(excluding health insurance coverage of retirees)

Health insurance coverage
of retirees

Change in the defined benefit obligation

2009

2008

2007

2009

2008

2007

Defined benefit obligation at beginning of year

1,522.0

1,733.4

1,836.0

41.7

41.0

53.8

Current service cost

51.3

53.4

61.8

0.6

1.4

1.6

Interest cost

89.4

88.7

85.7

2.4

2.2

2.3

Plan participants’ contributions

5.7

7.1

7.9

-

-

-

Benefit obligation assumed on acquisition of subsidiaries

5.1

7.3

41.3

-

-

-

Benefit obligation transferred on disposal of subsidiaries

(14.3)

(20.4)

(2.3)

-

-

-

Curtailments

Liquidations

(9.3)

(1.1)

(5.0)

(23.2)

(3.3)

(9.6)

-

(2.6)

-

-

(8.3)

-

Actuarial loss (gain)

142.6

(75.2)

(128.5)

1.3

(3.7)

(5.9)

Benefits paid

(78.8)

(79.2)

(75.6)

(2.8)

(3.1)

(2.6)

Plan amendments

3.3

43.0

21.1

-

-

-

Other (incl. changes in consolidation scope and foreign exchange translation)

54.2

(207.9)

(101.1)

0.9

3.9

0.1

(1) Defined benefit obligation at end of year

1,770.1

1,522.0

1,733.4

41.5

41.7

41.0

Other changes in the defined benefit obligation for pension plans and other post-employment benefits (excluding medical insurance coverage of retirees) primarily concern the impact of foreign exchange translation (€60 million in 2009).

b-2 Change in plan assets

 

As of December 31,

(€ million)

Pension plans and other post-employment benefits

(excluding health insurance coverage of retirees)

Health insurance coverage of retirees

Change in plan assets

2009

2008

2007

2009

2008

2007

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

901.1

1,242.7

1,220.8

-

-

-

Expected return on plan assets

58.6

72.8

70.9

-

-

-

Actuarial gains (losses)

79.2

(219.6)

(5.6)

-

-

-

Group contributions

63.4

45.2

74.9

-

-

-

Plan participants’ contributions

5.7

7.1

7.9

-

-

-

Plan assets acquired on acquisition of subsidiaries

4.1

1.8

24.8

-

-

-

Plan assets transferred on disposal of subsidiaries

(2.4)

(1.6)

(0.5)

-

-

-

Liquidations

(0.9)

(12.2)

(9.9)

-

-

-

Benefits paid

(50.5)

(49.0)

(47.8)

-

-

-

Other (incl. changes in consolidation scope and foreign exchange translation)

43.6

(185.9)

(92.8)

-

-

-

(2) Fair value of plan assets at end of year

1,101.9

901.1

1,242.7

-

-

-




F-110



Back to Contents


Other changes in plan assets primarily concern the impact of foreign exchange translation (€51 million in 2009).

Group pension plan assets were invested as follows as of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007:

 

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31,2007

Shares

46%

46%

50%

Bonds and debt instruments

41%

40%

38%

Insurance risk-free funds

13%

12%

8%

Liquid assets

0%

0%

3%

Other

0%

2%

1%


Group assets in France are primarily invested with insurance companies and the expected long-term return on these assets is directly linked to past rates of return. Assets in the United Kingdom are primarily invested in shares and bonds via a trust and expected long-term rates of return are based on long-term market performance statistics.

The actual return on plan assets (expected return on plan assets + actuarial gains/losses) was €137.8 million at the end of 2009, compared to -€146.8 million at the end of December 2008 and €65.3 million at the end of December 2007.

The expected return on plan assets in 2010 is €64 million.

Group contributions in 2009 include exceptional contributions of €7 million in the United Kingdom.

The Group plans to make contributions of €46 million to defined benefit plans in 2010.

b-3 Change in funding status and the provision

 

As of December 31

 

Pension plans and other post-employment benefits

(excluding health insurance coverage of retirees)

Health insurance coverage of retirees

(€ million)

2009

2008

2007

2009

2008

2007

Funding status = (2) – (1)

(668.2)

(620.9)

(490.7)

(41.5)

(41.7)

(41.0)

Unrecognized past service costs

88.4

96.6

61.2

0.6

-

-

Other

0

(2.1)

(6.4)

 

-

-

Net obligation

(579.8)

(526.4)

(435.9)

(40.8)

(41.7)

(41.0)

Provisions

(594.2)

(539.8)

(445.3)

(40.8)

(41.7)

(41.0)

Prepaid benefits

14.4

13.6

9.4

0

-

-




F-111



Back to Contents


Provisions for post-employment benefits total €635.0 million, compared to €581.5 million in 2008. In 2009, this amount notably includes provisions of €7.2 million reclassified in the consolidated statement of financial position in Liabilities directly associated with assets held for sale (i.e. an amount of €627.8 million recorded in the consolidated statement of financial position).

The defined benefit obligation (DBO) is €347 million for unfunded defined benefit pension plans and other post-employment benefits (excluding medical insurance coverage of retirees) and €1,423 million for partially or fully funded plans as of December 31, 2009, compared to €341 million and €1,181 million at the end of 2008 and €334 million and €1,441 million at the end of 2007.

b-4 Change in repayment entitlement

(€ million)

Change in repayment entitlement

2009

2008

2007

Fair value of repayment entitlement at beginning of year

22.3

21.5

25.9

Expected return on repayment entitlement

0.9

0.9

1.1

Actuarial gains (losses)

0.9

(1.0)

(3.3)

Repayment entitlement acquired on acquisition of subsidiaries

-

-

-

Repayments

(1.9)

(1.6)

(2.2)

Other (including new repayment entitlements)

0.2

2.5

-

Fair value of repayment entitlement at end of year

22.4

22.3

21.5


The market value of repayment entitlement recorded in assets as of December 31, 2009 is €22.4 million. Repayment entitlement concerns the portion of employee rights to post-employment benefits (including medical insurance coverage of retirees) corresponding to periods during which the employee was employed by a previous employer or where the operating contract stipulates that employee entitlement to post-employment benefits is assumed by a third party.'

b-5 Impact on the consolidated income statement

The net benefit cost for the period is as follows:

 

As of December 31

 

Pension plans and other post-employment benefits

(excluding health insurance coverage of retirees)

Health insurance coverage of retirees

(€ million)

2009

2008

2007

2009

2008

2007

Current service cost

51.3

53.4

61.8

0.6

1.4

1.6

Interest cost

89.4

88.7

85.7

2.4

2.2

2.3

Expected return on plan assets

(58.6)

(72.8)

(70.9)

-

-

-

Expected return on repayment entitlement

-

-

(1.1)

(0.9)

(0.9)

-

Past service costs recognized in the year

10.2

9.4

7.6

0.4

-

0.1

Curtailments / liquidations

(9.5)

(16.3)

(3.1)

(2.6)

-

-

Other(1)

(12.3)

(1.2)

(0.3)

-

2.2

-

Net benefit cost(2)

70.5

61.2

79.7

(0.1)

4.9

4.0


(1)

In 2009, the “Other” heading primarily includes provision charges and reversals for labor commitments involving contract gains and losses.

(2)

The 2008 cost excludes the Clemessy and Crystal entities, divested in December 2008.


These costs were recorded in full in operating income, except for interest costs and the expected return on plan assets which are recorded in net finance costs.



F-112



Back to Contents


c - Actuarial assumptions

Actuarial assumptions used for calculation purposes vary depending on the country in which the plan is implemented.

Pension plans and other post-employment benefits (excluding medical insurance coverage of retirees)

The benefit obligation in respect of pension plans as of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 is based on the following average assumptions:

 

As of
December 31,
2009

As of
December 31,
2008

As of
December 31,
2007

Discount rate

5.23%

5.83%

5.49%

Expected rate of salary increase

3.66%

3.8%

3.5%

As of December 31, 2009, the discount rates in the main areas with regard to post-employment commitments are as follows:


Account heading

Impact reported in the 2nd update of  09/26/06

IFRIC 12

Correction

 

Concession intangible assets

1,841.2

2,091.8

+250.6

a) b) c)

Property, plant and equipment

6,894.0

6,885.7

-8.3

c)

Operating financial assets

5,446.9

5,545.4

+98.5

b)

Operating receivables

10,424.1

10,083.3

-340.8

a)

Changes in working capital

-157.0

-39.4

+117.6

a)

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

-1,719.5

-1,837.1

-117.6

a)

a)

Under the intangible asset model in the draft interpretation, revenue on the construction of infrastructure assets is recognized on a percentage completion basis through operating receivables. The definitive interpretation authorizes the recognition of revenue directly through intangible assets. This option was adopted by Veolia Environnement.

b)

Impact of definitive texts relating to the bifurcation model on assets with residual values guaranteed by the concession grantor (Water Division Germany)

c)

Extension of the application scope of IFRIC 12.

As of


Back to contents



48.2

Reconciliation of equity as of December 31, 2005 and equity as of December 31, 2005 adjusted


(€ millions)

Share capital

Additional paid-in capital

Treasury shares

Consolidated reserves and retained earnings

Fair value reserves

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

Minority interests

Total equity

December 31, 2005

2,039.4

6,499.1

(452.7)

(4,227.4)

(55.8)

3,802.6

1,890.9

5,693.5

Financial asset model

-

-

-

6.2

-

6.2

-11.8

-5.6

Intangible asset model

-

-

-

-28.3

-

-28.3

9.4

-18.9

Bifurcation model

-

-

-

6.0

-

6.0

-

6.0

Other

-

-

-

3.7

-

3.7

-0.5

3.2

December 31, 2005 adjusted

2,039.4

6,499.1

(452.7)

(4,239.8)

(55.8)

3,790.2

1,888.0

5,678.2


48.3

2005 adjusted financial statements


2009

48.3.1

Consolidated Balance Sheet


(€ millions)

Notes

As of December 31, 2005

IFRIC 12 adjustments

As of December 31, 2005 adjusted

 

Goodwill

48.4.1

4,863.1

-110.8

4,752.3

Concession intangible assets

48.4.2

-

2,091.8

2,091.8

Other intangible assets

48.4.3

1,171.5

109.9

1,281.4

Publicly-owned utility networks

48.4.4

5,629.5

-5,465.8

6,885.7

Property, plant and equipment

6,722.0

Investments in associates

 

201.5

-

201.5

Non-consolidated investments

 

209.5

-

209.5

Long-term IFRIC4 loans

48.4.5

1,901.9

3,435.5

5,337.4

Non-current operating financial assets

-

Derivative instruments – Assets

 

249.0

-

249.0

Other non-current financial assets

 

692.5

-0.9

691.6

Deferred tax assets

 

1,127.3

7.4

1,134.7

Non-current assets

 

22,767.8

+67.1

22,834.9

Inventories and work-in-progress

 

646.2

-11.0

635.2

Operating receivables

48.4.6

10,112.3

-29.0

10,083.3

Short-term IFRIC4 loans

48.4.5

163.5

44.5

208.0

Current operating financial assets

-

-

Other short-term loans

 

221.2

-

221.2

Marketable securities

 

60.7

-

60.7

Cash and cash equivalents

 

2,336.1

-

2,336.1

Current assets

 

13,540.0

4.5

13,544.5

Non-current assets held for sale

 

1.6

-

1.6

Total assets

 

36,309.4

71.6

36,381.0

     

Share capital

48.2

2,039.4

-

2,039.4

Additional paid-in capital

48.2

6,499.1

-

6,499.1

Reserves and retained earnings attributable to equity holders of the parent

48.2

(4,735.9)

-12.4

(4,748.3)

Minority interests

48.2

1,890.9

-2.9

1,888.0

Equity

 

5,693.5

-15.3

5,678.2

Non-current provisions

48.4.7

1,613.6

34.4

1,648.0

Long-term borrowings

 

13,722.8

-

13,722.8

Derivative instruments – Liabilities

 

154.5

-

154.5

Other non-current liabilities

 

207.8

-4.1

203.7

Deferred tax liabilities

48.4.8

1,124.1

80.9

1,205.0





Back to contents




(€ millions)

Notes

As of December 31, 2005

IFRIC 12 adjustments

As of December 31, 2005 adjusted

 

Non-current liabilities

 

16,822.8

111.2

16,934.0

Operating payables

 

10,374.3

-4.5

10,369.8

Current provisions

48.4.7

773.8

-19.8

754.0

Short-term borrowings

 

2,138.2

-

2,138.2

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

 

506.8

-

506.8

Current liabilities

 

13,793.1

-24.3

13,768.8

Non-current liabilities held for sale

 

-

-

-

Total equity and liabilities

 

36,309.4

71.6

36,381.0


48.3.2

Consolidated Income Statement


(€ millions)

Notes

Year ended December 31, 2005

IFRIC 12 adjustments

Year ended December 31, 2005 adjusted for IFRIC 12

 

Revenue

48.5.1

25,244.9

448.2

25,693.1

o/w Revenue fromoperating financial assets

48.5.1

125.8

200.0

325.8

Cost of sales

 

(20,561.0)

-435.1

(20,996.1)

Selling costs

 

(478.5)

-

(478.5)

General and administrative expenses

 

(2,403.0)

5.4

(2,397.6)

Other operating revenue and expenses

 

90.5

-24.5

66.0

Operating income

48.5.2

1,892.9

-6.0

1,886.9

Finance costs

 

(781.7)

6.0

(775.7)

Finance income

 

68.3

-5.0

63.3

Other financial income and expenses

 

30.5

-2.4

28.1

Income tax expense

 

(422.9)

0.5

(422.4)

Share of net income of associates

 

14.9

-

14.9

Net income from continuing operations

 

802.0

-6.9

795.1

Net income from discontinued operations

 

-

-

-

Net income for the year

 

802.0

-6.9

795.1

Minority interests

 

179.0

-6.1

172.9

Attributable to equity holders of the parent

 

623.0

-0.8

622.2





Back to contents



48.3.3

Consolidated Cash Flow Statement


(€ millions)

Notes

Year ended December 31, 2005

IFRIC 12 adjustments

Year ended December 31, 2005 adjusted

 

Net income for the year attributable to equity holders of the parent

 

623.0

-0.8

622.2

Minority interests

 

179.0

-6.1

172.9

Operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses

 

1,829.3

-138.6

1,690.7

Financial amortization and impairment losses

 

(21.0)

-

(21.0)

Gains (losses) on disposal and dilution

 

(70.0)

-

(70.0)

Share of net income of associates

 

(14.9)

-

(14.9)

Dividends received

 

(6.5)

-

(6.5)

Finance costs, and finance income

 

713.4

-1.0

712.4

Income tax expense

 

422.9

-0.5

422.4

Other

 

32.1

1.6

33.7

Operating cash flow before changes in working capital

48.6.1

3,687.3

-145.4

3,541.9

Changes in working capital

48.6.2

(52.2)

12.8

(39.4)

Income taxes paid

 

(338.8)

-

(338.8)

Net cash flow from operating activities

 

3,296.3

132.6

3,163.7

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

48.6.3

(2,081.9)

244.8

(1,837.1)

Proceeds on disposal of property, plant and equipment

 

173.5

-4.7

168.8

Purchases of investments

 

(944.1)

-

(944.1)

Proceeds on disposal of investments

 

154.0

-

154.0

IFRIC 4 investment contracts:

    

New IFRIC 4 loans

48.6.4

(269.3)

269.3

-

Principal payments on IFRIC 4 loans

48.6.5

184.0

-184.0

-

Operating financial assets:

    

New operating financial assets

48.6.4

-

-513.4

(513.4)

Principal payments on operating financial assets

48.6.5

-

320.6

320.6

Dividends received

 

16.8

-

16.8

New long-term loans granted

 

(62.1)

-

(62.1)

Principal payments on long-term loans

 

55.7

-

55.7

Net decrease in short-term loans

 

115.0

-

115.0

Sales and purchases of marketable securities

 

118.2

-

118.2

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(2,540.2)

132.6

(2,407.6)

Net decrease in short-term borrowings

 

(2,936.2)

-

(2,936.2)

New long-term borrowings and other debt

 

3,134.1

0.7

3,134.8

Principal payments on long-term borrowings and other debt

 

(2,318.9)

-0.7

(2,319.6)

Proceeds on issue of shares

 

81.0

-

81.0

Purchase of treasury shares

 

-

-

-

Dividends paid

 

(374.0)

-

(374.0)

Interest paid

 

(738.8)

-

(738.8)

Net cash used in financing activities

 

(3,152.8)

-

(3,152.8)

Net cash at the beginning of the year

 

4,240.2

-

4,240.2

Effect of foreign exchange rate changes

 

(14.2)

-

(14.2)

Net cash at the end of the year

 

1,829.3

-

1,829.3

     

Cash and cash equivalents

 

2,336.1

-

2,336.1

- Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

 

506.8

-

506.8

Net cash at the end of the year

 

1,829.3

-

1,829.3





Back to contents



48.4

Analysis of the main balance sheet adjustments


48.4.1

Goodwill


(€ millions)

As of December 31, 2005

Intangible asset model

As of December 31, 2005 adjusted

Goodwill

4,863.1

-110.8

4,752.3


The adjustment corresponds to the full or partial transfer of goodwill balances to contractual rights.


48.4.2

Concession intangible assets


(€ millions)

As of December 31, 2005

Intangible asset model

As of December 31, 2005 adjusted

Concession intangible assets

-

2,091.8

2,091.8


Concession intangible assets are assets financed by the Group under concession contracts as defined by interpretation IFRIC 12, which do not satisfy the criteria for classification as operating financial assets, in particular as the concession grantor does not guarantee an unconditional right to cash or another financial asset.

These assets break down by Group division as follows:

·

Water Division: €1,533.8 million, notably in Germany, France, Morocco and China

·

Waste Management Division: €252.9 million, mainly incinerators without guaranteed volumes in France and the United Kingdom

·5.5%

Energy Services Division: €286.9 million, relating to heating networks in France and the Baltic States.

Concession intangible assets are primarily located in Europe (€1,455.6 million).


48.4.3

Other intangible assets


(€ millions)

As of December 31, 2005

Financial asset model

Intangible asset model

Other

As of December 31, 2005 adjusted

Other intangible assets

1,171.5

-41.0

172.3

-21.4

1,281.4


The adjustment of -€41 million following application of the financial asset model mainly corresponds to the transfer of Berlin water contract intangible assets to operating financial assets (Water Division).

The impact of application of the intangible asset model mainly reflects the transfer of goodwill of €149.8 million to contractual rights.


48.4.4

Property, plant and equipment


(€ millions)

As of December 31, 2005

Financial asset model

Intangible asset model

Bifurcation model

IFRIC 4

IAS16

As of December 31, 2005 adjusted

Publicly-owned utility networks

5,629.5

-3,141.5

-1,989.7

-287.5

-39.2

-171.6

0.0

Property, plant and equipment

6,722.0

-

-8.3

-

-

172.0

6,885.7

Property, plant and equipment

12,351.5

-3,141.5

-1,998.0

-287.5

-39.2

0.4

6,885.7



Adjustments to non-current assets as a result of application of IFRIC 12 involve the identification of operating financial assets or concession intangible assets.

Certain of the contracts analyzed lead to specific treatments in the accounts.  The choice of the financial asset or intangible asset model is based on the identity “in substance” of the payer of the service. Nonetheless, certain contracts may include a payment commitment incumbent on the concession grantor. Where this is the case, the investment amount guaranteed by the concession grantor is recognized under the financial asset model and the residual balance is recognized under the intangible asset model.  These restatements are presented in the “Bifurcation” column and primarily concern incinerators in the Waste Management Division.

The Group owns infrastructures that do not fall within the application scope of IFRIC 12 as at least one of the three qualifying criteria (service to public, control or regulation of services and price setting, control of the residual economic value of the infrastructure at the contract term) are not satisfied. Where this is the case, the infrastructure is recognized in accordance with IFRIC4 or IAS 16.





Back to contents



48.4.5

Non-current and current operating financial assets


(€ millions)

As of December 31, 2005

Financial asset model

IFRIC4

As of December 31, 2005 adjusted

Long-term IFRIC 4 loans

1,901.9

-608.0

33.2

1,327.1

Long-term IFRIC 12 loans

-

4,010.3

-

4,010.3

Non-current operating financial assets

1,901.9

3,402.3

33.2

5,337.4

Short-term IFRIC 4 loans

163.5

-8.5

10.2

165.2

Short-term IFRIC 12 loans

-

42.8

-

42.8

Current operating financial assets

163.5

34.3

10.2

208.0

Operating financial assets

2,065.4

3,436.6

43.4

5,545.4


These headings record loans relating to concession contracts satisfying the criteria laid down in IFRIC 12 and loans relating to contracts recognized in accordance with IFRIC4

Certain assets recognized in accordance with IFRIC 4 as of December 31, 2005, also satisfy the criteria for recognition in accordance with IFRIC 12 and have therefore been reclassified. Such assets have a net carrying amount of €608 million and concern BOT (Build Operate Transfer) contracts in the Water Division and incinerators in the Waste Management Division.

Operating financial assets break down by division as follows:


(€ millions)

IFRIC 4

IFRIC 12

Total

Water

502.8

3,360.5

3,863.3

Waste Management

120.3

628.9

749.2

Energy Services

795.0

27.1

822.1

Transportation

74.2

30.2

104.4

Other

-

6.4

6.4

Veolia Group

1,492.3

4,053.1

5,545.4


Operating financial assets in the Water Division mainly comprise infrastructure assets relating to the Berlin contract (€2.8 billion) and BOT contracts. In the Waste Management Division operating financial assets comprise incinerators and in the Energy Services Division they comprise cogeneration assets.

Note that pursuant to the financial asset model, revenue generated by the construction of the underlying infrastructure is recognized on a percentage completion basis (in accordance with IAS 11). The corresponding entry in the balance sheet is recognized in operating financial assets. This is notably the case for BOT contracts and incinerators.


48.4.6

Operating receivables


(€ millions)

As of December 31, 2005

Intangible asset model

As of December 31, 2005 adjusted

Operating receivables

10,112.3

-29.0

10,083.3


48.4.7

Non-current and current provisions



(€ millions)

As of December 31, 2005

Intangible asset model

Other

As of December 31, 2005 adjusted

Non-current provisions

1,613.6

33.7

0.7

1,648.0

Current provisions

773.8

-19.8

 

754.0

Provisions

2,387.4

13.9

0.7

2,402.0


48.4.8

Deferred tax liabilities


(€ millions)

As of December 31, 2005

Intangible asset model

Other

As of December 31, 2005 adjusted

Deferred tax liabilities

1,124.1

75.0

5.9

1,205.0


Adjustments in respect of the intangible asset model mainly concern the reclassification of goodwill as intangible rights (see Notes 48.4.1 and 48.4.3) and provision restatements (see Note 48.4.7).





Back to contents




48.5

Analysis of the main Income Statement restatements


48.5.1

Revenue


(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2005

Revenue from operating financial assets

Cancellation flows linked to PP&E  

Construction revenue

Other

Year ended December 31, 2005 adjusted for IFRIC 12

Water

8,888.7

161.3

-266.1

351.1

-0.8

9,134.2

Waste Management

6,604.1

34.1

-0.1

110.6

 

6,748.7

Energy Services

5,402.4

1.3

-3.2

63.1

 

5,463.6

Transportation

4,349.7

3.3

-3.7

-

-2.7

4,346.6

Revenue

25,244.9

200.0

-273.1

524.8

-3.5

25,693.1


The cancellation of flows linked to property, plant and equipment mainly corresponds to the application of the operating financial asset model to the Berlin contract (-€264 million).This reclassification led to the cancellation of fees of €143 million remunerating certain infrastructure assets and income of €121 million received in respect of the obsolescence of certain assets.

Adjustments relating to the recognition of construction revenue on a percentage completion basis concern contracts recognized in accordance with the operating financial asset model in the amount of €278 million and contracts recognized in accordance with the concession intangible asset model in the amount of €247 million. The inclusion of income of €115 million in respect of contracts recognized in accordance with IFRIC 4, brings revenue recognized on a percentage completion basis to €640 million.

Taking into account IFRIC 12 restatements, total revenue from operating financial assets, including contracts recognized in accordance with IFRIC4, is €325.8 million


48.5.2

Operating income


(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2005

Financial asset model

Intangible asset model

Bifurcation model

Other

Year ended December 31, 2005 adjusted

Water

1,007.3

-8.7

-0.7

-

4.4

1,002.3

Waste Management

530.5

14.3

-8.9

5.8

1.9

543.6

Energy Services

326.1

-

-12.1

0.5

0.8

315.3

Transportation

114.1

0.2

-

-

-3.5

110.8

Other

(85.1)

-

-

-

-

(85.1)

Operating income

1,892.9

5.8

-21.7

6.3

3.6

1,886.9


48.6

Analysis of the main Cash Flow Statement restatements


48.6.1

Operating cash flow before changes in working capital


(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2005

Financial asset model

Intangible asset model

Bifurcation model

Other

Year ended December 31, 2005 adjusted

Operating cash flow before changes in working capital

3,687.3

-138.0

-11.2

4.3

-0.5

3,541.9


The adjustments primarily concern the portion of revenue allocated to cancel charges to depreciation and amortization in the amount of -€138 million, including -€121 million in respect of the Berlin contract.





Back to contents



48.6.2

Changes in working capital


(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2005

Financial asset model

Intangible asset model

Bifurcation model

Year ended December 31, 2005 adjusted

Changes in working capital

(52.2)

(0.4)

2.5

10.7

(39.4)


48.6.3

Purchases of property, plant and equipment


(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2005

Financial asset model

Intangible asset model

Bifurcation model

Other

Year ended December 31, 2005 adjusted

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

(2,081.9)

177.1

8.0

55.7

4.0

(1,837.1)


The €177.1 million decrease in purchases of property, plant and equipment attributable to the financial asset model corresponds to the reclassification of assets as operating financial assets (see Note48.6.4).

The €55.7 million decrease in purchases of property, plant and equipment attributable to the bifurcation model corresponds to the reclassification of assets as operating financial assets (see Note 48.6.4) and mainly concerns incinerators in the Waste Management Division.


48.6.4

New operating financial assets


(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2005

Financial asset model

Bifurcation model

Other

Year ended December 31, 2005 adjusted

New operating financial assets

(269.3)

-170.4

-68.5

-5.2

(513.4)


These restatements represent the corresponding entries to the restatements presented in Note 48.6.3 and concern incinerators, BOT contracts and investments relating to the Berlin contract.


48.6.5

Principal payments on operating financial assets


(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2005

Financial asset model

Bifurcation model

Other

Year ended December 31, 2005 adjusted

Principal payments on operating financial assets

184.0

133.3

1.8

1.5

320.6


The adjustments of €136.6 million mainly correspond to the portion of revenue allocated to principal loan payments in respect of infrastructure assets (see Note 48.6.1). This income, which is included in the published 2005 revenue figure, is now excluded from revenue and recognized as an operating financial asset repayment flow.  It mainly corresponds to the reduction in operating cash flow.






Back to contents



Note 49

2004 adjusted consolidated financial statements: reconciliation


49.1

Summary of the impact of IFRIC 12 on the main financial statement headings


(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2004

Year ended December 31, 2004 adjusted

Difference

Income Statement

   
 

Revenue

22,500.3

22,920.5

420.2

 

Revenue fromoperating financial assets

96.7

275.6

178.9

 

Operating income

1,480.6

1,481.5

0.9

 

Net income for the year attributable to equity holders of the parent

391.5

389.8

-1.7

     
     

Balance Sheet

   
 

Intangible assets (1)

1,059.0

2,802.5

1,743.5

 

Property, plant and equipment

10,958.1

6,173.4

-4,784.7

 

Operating financial assets

1,826.5

5,105.9

3,279.4

 

Operating receivables

9,261.4

9,233.9

-27.5

 

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

3,222.8

3,211.2

-11.6

 

Equity

4,948.3

4,939.9

-8.4

     
     

Cash Flow Statement

   
 

Operating cash flow before changes in working capital

3,460.6

3,336.2

-124.4

 

Changes in working capital

294.4

286.1

-8.3

 

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

(1,964.0)

(1,723.0)

241.0

 

New operating financial assets

(177.0)

(428.5)

-251.5

 

Principal payments on operating financial assets

130.0

275.7

145.7

 

Net debt

13,058.9

13,058.9

-

     


(1)

Excluding goodwill but including concession intangible assets.


49.2

Reconciliation of equity as of December 31, 2004 and equity as of December 31, 2004 adjusted


(€ millions)

Share capital

Additional paid-in capital

Treasury shares

Consolidated reserves and retained earnings

Fair value reserves

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

Minority interests

Total equity

As of December 31, 2004

2,032.1

6,467.6

(459.3)

(4,738.0)

(79.6)

3,222.8

1,725.5

4,948.3

Financial asset model

-

-

-

-6.7

-

-6.7

-8.4

-15.1

Intangible asset model

-

-

-

-14.6

-

-14.6

13.1

-1.5

Bifurcation model

-

-

-

11.4

-

11.4

-

11.4

Other

-

-

-

-1.7

-

-1.7

-1.5

-3.2

As of December 31, 2004 adjusted

2,032.1

6,467.6

(459.3)

(4,749.6)

(79.6)

3,211.2

1,728.7

4,939.9




Back to contents






49.3

2004 adjusted financial statements

49.3.1

Consolidated Balance Sheet


(€ millions)

Notes

As of December 31, 2004

IFRIC 12 adjustments

As of December 31, 2004 adjusted

Goodwill

49.4.1

4,383.6

-136.8

4,246.8

Concession intangible assets

49.4.2

-

1,610.0

1,610.0

Other intangible assets

49.4.3

1,059.0

133.5

1,192.5

Publicly-owned utility networks

 

4,820.8

-4,784.7

6,173.4

Property, plant and equipment

49.4.4

6,137.3

Investments in associates

 

219.2

-

219.2

Non-consolidated investments

 

181.1

-

181.1

Long-term IFRIC 4 loans

 

1,693.5

3,253.5

4,947.0

Non-current operating financial assets

49.4.5

-

Derivative instruments – Assets

 

424.8

-

424.8

Other non-current financial assets

 

614.7

-8.0

606.7

Deferred tax assets

 

1,122.6

9.2

1,131.8

Non-current assets

 

20,656.6

76.7

20,733.3

Inventories and work-in-progress

 

562.0

-1.7

560.3

Operating receivables

49.4.6

9,261.4

-27.5

9,233.9

Short-term IFRIC 4 loans

 

133.0

25.9

158.9

Current operating financial assets

49.4.5

 

Other short-term loans

 

333.0

-

333.0

Marketable securities

 

189.3

-

189.3

Cash and cash equivalents

 

4,660.3

-

4,660.3

Current assets

 

15,139.0

-3.3

15,135.7

Non-current assets held for sale

 

30.3

-

30.3

Total assets

 

35,825.9

73.4

35,899.3

     

Share capital

49.2

2,032.1

-

2,032.1

Additional paid-in capital

49.2

6,467.6

-

6,467.6

Reserves and retained earnings attributable to equity holders of the parent

49.2

(5,276.9)

-11.6

(5,288.5)

Minority interests

49.2

1,725.5

3.2

1,728.7

Equity

 

4,948.3

-8.4

4,939.9

Non-current provisions

49.4.7

1,283.5

25.1

1,308.6

Long-term borrowings

 

12,157.0

-

12,157.0

Derivative instruments – Liabilities

 

189.8

-

189.8

Other non-current liabilities

 

163.8

-4.1

159.7

Deferred tax liabilities

49.4.8

933.8

87.5

1,021.3

Non-current liabilities

 

14,727.9

108.5

14,836.4

Operating payables

 

9,576.0

-3.8

9,572.2

Current provisions

49.4.7

723.0

-22.9

700.1

Short-term borrowings

 

5,426.1

-

5,426.1

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

 

420.1

-

420.1

Current liabilities

 

16,145.2

-26.7

16,118.5

Non-current liabilities held for sale

 

4.5

-

4.5

Total equity and liabilities

 

35,825.9

73.4

35,899.3




Back to contents



49.3.2

Consolidated Income Statement


(€ millions)

Notes

Year ended December 31, 2004

IFRIC 12 adjustments

Year ended December 31, 2004 adjusted

 

Revenue

49.5.1

22,500.3

420.2

22,920.5

o/w Revenue from operating financial assets

49.5.1

96.7

178.9

275.6

Cost of sales

 

(18,346.3)

-392.0

(18,738.3)

Selling costs

 

(439.7)

-

(439.7)

General and administrative expenses

 

(2,236.4)

6.6

(2,229.8)

Other operating revenue and expenses

 

2.7

-33.9

(31.2)

Operating income

49.5.2

1,480.6

0.9

1,481.5

Finance costs

 

(829.1)

-5.5

(834.6)

Finance income

 

97.0

-5.2

91.8

Other financial income and expenses

 

46.1

-1.7

44.4

Income tax expense

 

(184.1)

5.6

(178.5)

Share of net income of associates

 

24.2

-

24.2

Net income from continuing operations

 

634.7

-5.9

628.8

Net income from discontinued operations

 

(26.9)

-

(26.9)

Net income for the year

 

607.8

-5.9

601.9

Minority interests

 

216.3

-4.2

211.1

Attributable to equity holders of the parent

 

391.5

-1.7

389.8





Back to contents



49.3.3

Consolidated Cash Flow Statement


(€ millions)

Notes

Year ended December 31, 2004

IFRIC 12 adjustments

Year ended December 31, 2004 adjusted

 

Net income for the year attributable to equity holders of the parent

 

391.5

-1.7

389.8

Minority interests

 

216.4

-4.1

212.3

Operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses

 

2,041.5

-123.7

1,917.8

Financial amortization and impairment losses

 

(38.2)

-

(38.2)

Gains (losses) on disposal and dilution

 

(161.3)

-

(161.3)

Share of net income of associates

 

(24.2)

-

(24.2)

Dividends received

 

(6.0)

-

(6.0)

Finance costs and finance income

 

732.1

10.7

742.8

Income tax expense

 

309.5

-5.6

303.9

Other

 

(0.7)

-

(0.7)

Operating cash flow before changes in working capital

49.6.1

3,460.6

-124.4

3,336.2

Changes in working capital

49.6.2

294.4

-8.3

286.1

Income taxes paid

 

(238.0)

-

(238.0)

Net cash flow from operating activities

 

3,517.0

-132.7

3,384.3

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

49.6.3

(1,964.0)

241.0

(1,723.0)

Proceeds on disposal of property, plant and equipment

 

316.2

5.6

321.8

Purchases of investments

 

(334.0)

1.5

(332.5)

Proceeds on disposal of investments

 

2,184.2

-

2,184.2

IFRIC 4 investment contracts:

    

New IFRIC 4 loans

49.6.4

(177.0)

177.0

-

Principal payments on IFRIC 4 loans

49.6.5

130.0

-130.0

-

Operating financial assets:

    

New operating financial assets

49.6.4

-

-428.5

(428.5)

Principal payments on operating financial assets

49.6.5

-

275.7

275.7

Dividends received

 

23.5

-

23.5

New long-term loans granted

 

(132.5)

-

(132.5)

Principal payments on long-term loans

 

129.4

2.0

131.4

Net decrease in short-term loans

 

41.1

-

41.1

Sales and purchases of marketable securities

 

(42.3)

-

(42.3)

Net cash from investing activities

 

174.6

144.3

318.9

Net increase in short-term borrowings

 

1,789.2

-

1,789.2

New long-term borrowings and other debt

 

930.5

-

930.5

Principal payments on long-term borrowings and other debt

 

(3,468.7)

-

(3,468.7)

Proceeds on issue of shares

 

167.2

-

167.2

Purchase of treasury shares

 

(183.2)

-

(183.2)

Dividends paid

 

(389.6)

-

(389.6)

Interest paid

 

(640.9)

-

(640.9)

Net cash used in financing activities

 

(1,795.5)

-

(1,795.5)

Net cash  at the beginning of the year

 

2,320.6

-

2,320.6

Effect of foreign exchange rate changes

 

23.5

-11.6

11.9

Net cash at the end of the year

 

4,240.2

-

4,240.2

     

Cash and cash equivalents

 

4,660.3

-

4,660.3

- Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

 

420.1

-

420.1

Net cash at the end of the year

 

4,240.2

-

4,240.2





Back to contents



49.4

Analysis of the main balance sheet restatements


49.4.1

Goodwill


(€ millions)

As of December 31, 2004

Intangible asset model

Other

As of December 31, 2004 adjusted

Goodwill

4,383.6

-37.7

-99.1

4,246.8

49.4.2

Concession intangible assets


(€ millions)

As of December 31, 2004

Financial asset model

Intangible asset model

Bifurcation model

As of December 31, 2004 adjusted

Concession intangible assets

-

1.2

1,447.4

161.4

1,610.0

49.4.3

Other intangible assets


(€ millions)

As of December 31, 2004

Financial asset model

Intangible asset model

IFRIC 4

Other

As of December 31, 2004 adjusted

Other intangible assets

1,059.0

-42.1

58.5

-1.2

118.3

1,192.5

49.4.4

Property, plant and equipment


(€ millions)

As of December 31, 2004

Financial asset model

Intangible asset model

Bifurcation model

IFRIC4

Other

As of December 31, 2004 adjusted

Publicly-owned utility networks

4,820.8

n.av.

n.av.

n.av.

n.av.

n.av.

-

Property, plant and equipment

6,137.3

n.av.

n.av.

n.av.

n.av.

n.av.

6,173.4

Property, plant and equipment

10,958.1

-3,067.0

-1,464.9

-206.7

-44.7

-1.4

6,173.4


49.4.5

Non-current and current operating financial assets


(€ millions)

As of December 31, 2004

Financial asset model

Intangible asset model

Bifurcation model

IFRIC 4

As of December 31, 2004 adjusted

Long-term IFRIC 4 loans

1,693.5

3,085.1

-

87.4

35.5

4,901.5

Long-term IFRIC 12 loans

-

-

43.1

2.4

-

45.5

Non-current operating financial assets

1,693.5

3,085.1

43.1

89.8

35.5

4,947.0

Short-term IFRIC 4 loans

133.0

14.3

-

2.7

8.9

158.9

Current operating financial assets

133.0

14.3

-

2.7

8.9

158.9

Operating financial assets

1,826.5

3,099.4

43.1

92.5

44.4

5,105.9





Back to contents



49.4.6

Operating receivables


(€ millions)

As of December 31, 2004

Intangible asset model

Bifurcation model

Other

As of December 31, 2004 adjusted

Operating receivables

9,261.4

5.5

-34.8

1.8

9,233.9


49.4.7

Non-current and current provisions



(€ millions)

As of December 31, 2004

Financial asset model

Other

As of December 31, 2004 adjusted

Non-current provisions

1,283.5

0.5

24.6

1,308.6

Current provisions

723.0

0.1

-23.0

700.1

Provisions

2,006.5

0.6

1.6

2,008.7


49.4.8

Deferred tax liabilities


(€ millions)

As of December 31, 2004

Financial asset model

Intangible asset model

Bifurcation model

IFRIC 4

Other

As of December 31, 2004 adjusted

Deferred tax liabilities

933.8

1.7

13.9

-1.4

2.1

71.2

1,021.3


49.5

Analysis of the main Income Statement restatements


49.5.1

Revenue (work in progress)


(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2004

Revenue from operating financial assets

Cancellation flows linked to PP&E  

Construc-tion revenue

Other

Year ended December 31, 2004 adjusted

Water

7,777.4

157.5

-232.8

274.8

-

7,976.9

Waste Management

6,214.4

18.4

5.7

142.1

-

6,380.6

Energy Services

4,919.8

0.2

-3.5

58.4

-

4,974.9

Transportation

3,588.7

2.8

-0.7

-

-2.7

3,588.1

Revenue

22,500.3

178.9

-231.3

475.3

-2.7

22,920.5


49.5.2

Operating income


(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2004

Financial asset model

Intangible asset model

Bifurcation model

Other

Year ended December 31, 2004 adjusted

Water

799.5

4.2

-

-

-5.1

798.6

Waste Management

467.5

13.4

-1.8

1.5

-

480.6

Energy Services

250.3

-

-10.3

-0.3

-0.1

239.6

Transportation

31.4

1.1

-

-

-1.7

30.8

Other

(68.1)

-

-

-

-

(68.1)

Operating income

1,480.6

18.7

-12.1

1.2

-6.9

1,481.5






Back to contents



49.6

Analysis of the main Cash Flow Statement restatements


49.6.1

Operating cash flow before changes in working capital


(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2004

Financial asset model

Intangible asset model

Bifurcation model

IFRIC 4

Year ended December 31, 2004 adjusted

Operating cash flow before changes in working capital

3,460.6

-131.5

0.2

0.6

6.3

3,336.2


49.6.2

Changes in working capital


(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2004

Financial asset model

IFRIC 4

Year ended December 31, 2004 adjusted

Changes in working capital

294.4

-1.5

-6.8

286.1


49.6.3

Purchases of property, plant and equipment


(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2004

Financial asset model

Intangible asset model

Bifurcation model

Other

Year ended December 31, 2004 adjusted

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

(1,964.0)

182.3

-0.3

51.7

7.3

(1,723.0)


49.6.4

New operating financial assets


(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2004

Financial asset model

Bifurcation model

Other

Year ended December 31, 2004 adjusted

New operating financial assets

(177.0)

-193.4

-53.4

-4.7

(428.5)


49.6.5

Principal payments on operating financial assets



(€ millions)

Year ended December 31, 2004

Financial asset model

Bifurcation model

Other

Year ended December 31, 2004 adjusted

Principal payments on operating financial assets

130.0

142.2

2.2

1.3

275.7






Back to contents



Note 50

Main companies included in the 2006 consolidated financial statements


In 2006 the Group consolidated or accounted for a total of 2,237 companies, of which the principal companies are:


Company and address

French company registration number (N° Siret)

Consolidation method

% holding

Veolia Environnement SA
36-38, avenue Kléber – 75116 Paris

403 210 032 00047

FC

100.00

Sense SAS
rue Annette Bloch – 25200 Montbéliard

444 590 921 00052

FC

80.47

WATER

 

Euro zone

5.25%

 

Compagnie des Eaux et de l’Ozone

52, rue d’Anjou – 75008 Paris

775 667 363 01597

FC

100.00

Compagnie des Eaux de Paris

7, rue Tronson-du-Coudray – 75008 Paris

329 207 740 00047

FC

100.00

Société Française de Distribution d’Eau

7, rue Tronson-du-Coudray – 75008 Paris

542 054 945 00069

FC

99.86

Compagnie Fermière de Services Publics

3, rue Marcel Sembat – Immeuble CAP 44 – 44100 Nantes

575 750 161 00342

FC

99.11

Compagnie Méditerranéenne d’exploitation des Services d’Eau

12, boulevard René Cassin – 06100 Nice

780 153 292 00112

FC

99.72

Société des Eaux de Melun
Zone Industrielle – 198/398, rue Foch – 77000 Vaux Le Pénil

785 751 058 00047

FC

99.28

Société des Eaux de Marseille et ses filiales
25, rue Edouard Delanglade – BP 29 – 13254 Marseille

057 806 150 00017

PC

48.84

Société des Eaux du Nord
217, boulevard de la Liberté – 59800 Lille

572 026 417 00244

PC

49,55

Société des Eaux de Versailles et de Saint-Cloud
145, rue Yves le Coz – 78000 Versailles

318 634 649 00053

PC

50.00

Sade-Compagnie Générale de Travaux d’Hydraulique
et ses filiales
28, rue de la Baume – 75008 Paris

562 077 503 00018

FC

98.70

Veolia Water Solutions et Technologies
l’Aquarène – 1, place Montgolfier – 94417 St Maurice Cedex

542 078 688 01065

FC

100.00

Including the following foreign companies

Veolia Water UK Plc et ses filiales
37-41 Old Queen Street,
London SW1H 9JA (United-Kingdom)

FC

100.00

Veolia Water North America et ses filiales
14950 Heathrow Forest Parkway – Suite 200
Houston TX77032 Texas (USAs)

FC

100.00

Veolia Wasser  Deutschland Gmbh

Lindencorso Unter den linden 21 – D 10 117 Berlin (Germany)

FC

100.00

Berliner Wasser Betriebe
Neue Jüdenstrasse 1 – D10179 Berlin Mitte (Germany)

PC

24.95

Braunschweig  Versorgungs AG GMBH

Taubenstrasse 7 D-38 108 Braunschweig (Germany)

FC

74.90

Aquiris SA

Avenue de Vilvorde 450 - 1130 Brussels (Belgium)

FC

96.50

Apa Nova Bucuresti Srl

Strada Aristide Demetriade nr 2 ,  Sector 1, Bucharest

(Roumania)

FC

83.69

Veolia Voda

52, rue d’Anjou – 75 008Paris

FC

100.00

Prazske Vodovody A Kanalizagce As

11 Parizska -11 000 Prague 1 (Czeck Republic)

FC

9989




Back to contents






Severoceske Vodovody A Kanalizagce As

1 689 Pritkovska – 41 550 Teplice (Czeck Republic)

FC

50.04

Shenzhen Water (Group) Company Ltd
Water Tower, n°1019 Shennan Zhong Road – Shenzhen 518031 (China)

PC

25.0

Shanghai Pudong  VW Corporation Ltd

703 Pujian Road, Pudong New District, 200127 Shanghai (China)

PC

50.00

Changzhou CGE Water Co Ltd
12 Juqian Road – Changzhou  (China)

PC

24.99

Kunming CGE Water Supply Co Ltd
No262 Beijing Road - Kunming (Chine)

PC

24.99

Veolia Water Korea  Co Ltd

San 136-1, Ami-ri, Budal-Eup, Ichon-Shi,  -  GYONGGI-DO  467-701 (South Korea)

FC

100.00

United Water International Pty Ltd

65 Pirrama Road, Pyrmont NSW 2009 (Australia)

FC

95.00

Société d’Energie et d’Eau du Gabon

BP 2187 – Libreville (Gabon)

FC

51.00

Veolia Water AMI

52 rue d’Anjou – 75 008 Paris

FC

100.00

Société des Eaux Electricité du Nord - Amendis

23 rue Carnot – 90 000 Tangiers(Morocco)

FC

51.00

Société des Eaux Electricité du Nord - Amendis

23 rue Carnot – 90 000 Tangiers(Morocco)

FC

51.00

REDAL  SA

6 Zankat El Hoceima, BP 161 – 10 000 Rabat (Morocco)

FC

100.00





Back to contents


The expected returns on plan assets in 2009, 2008 and 2007, as defined at the start of each year to determine the amount recorded in the income statement, are as follows:

 

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31,
2008

As of
December 31,
2007

Expected return on plan assets

6.5%

6.4%

6.0%

Average residual active life expectancy (in years)

13.0

12.0

12.0


In the United Kingdom, where the vast majority of plan assets are located, the expected return, as defined at the start of 2009, was 7%.

The actual return on plans assets in 2009, 2008 and 2007 was 13.8%, -13.7% and 5.3% respectively.

The Group benefit obligation is especially sensitive to the discount rate and inflation. A 1% increase in the discount rate would decrease the benefit obligation by €237 million and current service costs by €10 million. A 1% decrease in the discount rate would increase the benefit obligation by €284 million and current service costs by €13 million.

Conversely, a 1% increase in the inflation rate would increase the benefit obligation by €231 million and current service costs by €9 million. A 1% decrease in the inflation rate would decrease the benefit obligation by €201 million and current service costs by €7 million.

A 1% increase in the expected rate of return assumption would generate additional income of €7.8 million.

Medical insurance coverage of retirees

Additional assumptions concerning health insurance plans are as follows:

Average rate of increase in health insurance costs

As of
December 31,
2009

As of
December 31,
2008

As of
December 31,
2007

Assumed rate of increase in health costs in the coming year

4.9%

5.1%

5.4%

Target rate of increase in costs

3.5%

3.6%

3.5%

Year long-term rate is expected to stabilize

2019

2020

2020

Assumptions concerning the growth in health insurance costs impact the post-employment benefit obligation as follows: a 1% increase in the assumed rate of increase in health costs would increase the post-employment benefit obligation by €6.9 million and, conversely, a 1% decrease would reduce the post-employment benefit obligation by €5.3 million.

Assumptions concerning the rate of increase in health insurance costs have a minimal impact on the current service cost.



F-113


ENERGY SERVICES

Dalkia – Saint-André
37, avenue du Mal de Lattre de Tassigny
59350 St André les Lille

403 211 295 00023

FC

66.00

Dalkia France
37, avenue du Mal de Lattre de Tassigny
59350 St André les Lille

456 500 537 00018

FC

65.94

Cogestar – Saint André
37, avenue du Mal de Lattre de Tassigny
59350 St André les Lille

404 324 097 00025

FC

65.94

Cogestar 2 – Saint André
33, place Ronde Quartier Valmy – 92800 Puteaux

431 951 540 00019

FC

65.94

Crystal S.A. – Saint André
37, avenue du Mal de Lattre de Tassigny
59350 St André les Lille

322 498 270 00014

FC

65.94

Citelum
37 rue de Lyon 75012 Paris

389 643 859 00019

FC

65.94

Clemessy  and its subsidiaries
18, rue de Thann – 68200 Mulhouse

945 752 137 00212

FC

65.68

Including the following foreign companies

Dalkia PLC et ses filiales
Elizabeth House – 56-60 London Road – Staines TW18 4BQ

(United-Kingdom)

PC

50.02

Dalkia NV et ses filiales
52 Quai fernand demets – 1070 – Anderlecht (Belgium)

PC

50.02

Siram SPA et ses filiales
Via Bisceglie, 95 – 20152 Milano (Italy)

PC

50.02

Dalkia Energia Y Servicios and its subsidiaries

Cl Juan Ignacio Luca De tgna, 4 – 28 027 Madrid (Spain)

PC

50.02

Dalkia GmbH et ses filiales

Carl-Ulrich-Strabe 4 - 63263 Neu Isenburg (Germany)

PC

50.02

Dalkia SGPS SA et ses Filiales

Estrada de Paço d’Arcos 2780 – 666 Paco d’Arços (Portugal )

PC

50.02

Dalkia Limitada et ses filiales

Rua Fidencio Ramos, 223 – 13 andar,  Vila Olimpia

Sao Paulo SP (Brazil)

PC

50.02

Dalkia Polska et ses filiales

Ul Kruczkowskiego 8 – 00 380 Varsovie (Poland)

PC

32.51

Zespol Elektrocieplownl w Lodzi et sa filiale

5 J. Andrzejewskiej Street 90-975 Lodz (Poland)

PC

16.58

Dalkia Poznan Spolka

UL. Swierzawska 18 – 60321 Poznan (Poland)

PC

25.78

Dalkia Poznan Zep et ses filiales
UL Gdynska 54 – 60-960 Poznan (Poland)

PC

26.11

Dalkia AB et and its subsidiaries

Hälsingegatan 47 –  113 31 Stockholm (Sweden)

PC

50.02

Erakute and its subsidiaries

Tartu mnt 16 10117 Tallinn (Estonia)

PC

50.02

Tallinna Kute

Punane 36 13619  Tallinn (Estonia)

PC

50.02

Vilnius Energija

V. Kudirkos g. 22, 2001 VILNIUS (Lituania)

PC

50.02

Dalkia Zrt. et ses filiales

Budafoki út 91-93  – H-1117 Budapest (Hungary)

PC

49.83

Dalkia a.s et ses filiales
Kutlíkova 17 – Technopol –  851 02 Bratislava 5 (Slovakia)

PC

50.02

C-Term et ses filiales

Lenardova 6 – 852 39 Bratislava (Slovakia)

PC

50.02

Dalkia Ceska Republika and its subsidiaries

28.řijna 3123/ 152 – 709 74 Ostrava  (Czeck Republic)

PC

49.05





Back to contents

Back to Contents




WASTE MANAGEMENT

Veolia Propreté
Parc des Fontaines – 163 / 169, avenue Georges Clémenceau
92000 Nanterre

572 221 034 00778

FC

100.00

Société d’Assainissement Rationnel et de Pompage and its subsidiaries (S.A.R.P.)
162/16 Energy Park IV – 162/166, boulevard de Verdun
92413 Courbevoie Cedex

775 734 817 00353

FC

99.55

SARP Industries and its subsidiaries
427, route du Hazay – Zone Portuaire Limay-Porcheville-78520 Limay

303 772 982 00029

FC

99.84

RENOSOL and its subsidiaries
162/16 boulevard de Verdun - Energy Park IV
92413 Courbevoie Cedex

334 516 895 000 11

FC

100.00

Paul Granjouan and its subsidiaries
rue des abattoirs – 44023 – Nantes Cedex

867 800 518 000 13

FC

100.00

Including the following foreign companies

Veolia ES Holding PLC and its subsidiaries
Onyx house – 401 Mile end Road
E34 PB – London (U.K.)

FC

100.00

Veolia ES Nottinghamshire Limited
Onyx house – 401 Mile end Road
E34 PB – London (U.K.)

FC

100.00

Cleanaway Ltd
(U.K.)

FC

100.00

VES North America Corp.
(U.S.A.)

FC

100.00

VES Solid Waste
One Honey Creed Corporate Center – 125 South
84th Street – Suite 200
WI 53214 Milwaukee (U.S.A.)

FC

100.00

Veolia ES Australia Pty Ltd
280 Georges Street – Level 12 – P.O. Box H126 Australia Square - NSW 1215 – Sydney (Australia)

FC

100.00

Onyx Asia Pte Ltd
3 Temasek av 30-03 Centennial Tower – Singapore

FC

100.00

Marius Pedersen – Danemark and its subsidiaries
Ørbaekvej 495863 Ferritslev (Denmark)

FC

65.00

Veolia ES Belgium NV and its subsidiaries
Robert Schumanplein 6
BUS 5
1040 Brussels (Belgium)

FC

100.00





Back to contents




TRANSPORTATION

VEOLIA TRANSPORT
Parc des Fontaines – 163 / 169, avenue Georges Clémenceau
92000 Nanterre

383 607 090 00016

FC

100.00

Société Nationale Maritime Corse-Méditerranée (SNCM)
61 boulevard des Dames – 13002 Marseille (France)

775 558 463 00011

FC

28.29

C.F.T.I. (Compagnie Française de Transport Interurbain) Parc des Fontaines – 163 / 169, avenue Georges Clémenceau – 92000 Nanterre

552 022 063 01075

FC

99.88

C.G.F.T.E. (Compagnie Générale Française de Transports
et d’Entreprises)

Parc des Fontaines – 163 / 169, avenue Georges Clémenceau
92000 Nanterre

344 379 060 00082

FC

100.00

Veolia Eurolines and its subsidiaries

FC

99.99

Including the following foreign companies

CONNEX NORTH AMERICA (CNA)
2100 Huntingdon Avenue MD 21211 Baltimore (U.S.A)

FC

100.00

Shuttleport Holdings LLC
2015 Spring Road – Suite 600
60523 Oakbrook – Illinois (U.S.A.)

FC

100.00

Super Shuttle International Inc,
(U.S.A.)

FC

81.00

Connex GVI Inc

720 rue Trotter – St-Jean-sur-Richelieu, QC, J3B 8T2 (Canada)

FC

100.00

CONNEX GROUP AUSTRALIA PTY LTD
Level 3, Flinders St Station, 223 Flinders St
Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia

FC

100.00

CONNEX TRANSPORT AB
Englundavagen 9 – Box 1820 – 17124 Solna (Sweden)

FC

100.00

Veolia Transport Norge AS
Klubbgaten 1 – N 4013 – Stavanger (Norway)

FC

100.00

CONNEX TRANSPORT UK LTD
Waterloo Business Center – 117 Waterloo Road
London SE1 8UL, (U.K.)

FC

100.00

Pullman Coachez Limited
Unit 12 Crofty Ind Estate Penclawdd

Swansea (U.K.)

FC

100.00

Dunn Line Plc
The Coach Station Park Lane Basford – Nottingham (United-Kingdom)

FC

100.00

Dunn Line Polska sp zoo

Ul Hunitcza 1 – 81-212 – Gdynia (Poland)

FC

65.00

CONNEX VERKEHR GmbH
Rödelheimer Bahnweg 31,
60489 Frankfurt, Germany

FC

100.00

Connex Transport doo Croatia
Nova cesta 60/1st floor – 10000 - Zagreb

FC

65.00

PROACTIVA
216 Paso de la Castellana – 28046 Madrid (Spain)

PC

50.00


Consolidation method :

FC: Full consolidation – PC: Proportionate consolidation – EA: Equity affiliate





Back to contents




Note 51

Supplemental disclosures

Amounts for the current and four prior periods are as follows:

The following information has been prepared to present U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (U.S. GAAP) supplemental disclosures required under and US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulations applicable to the Group as a SEC foreign registrant.

In accordance with European Parliament and Council Regulation (EC) No.1606/2002 of July 19, 2002 and  Commission Regulation (EC) No.1725/2003 of September 29, 2003, the Veolia Environnement consolidated financial statements are, since the year ended December 31, 2005, presented in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), as published by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and adopted by the European Union.

However, concession contracts are accounted for in the 2006 consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRIC Interpretation 12, Service Concession Arrangements, published in November 2006. This interpretation, which is pending  adoption by the European Union following a favorable vote of the EFRAG in March 2007, is applicable to accounting periods commencing on or after January 1, 2008. Veolia Environnement has elected for early adoption of this interpretation and the change in accounting method has been applied retrospectively in accordance with IAS 8 on Changes in accounting method.

As such, the Veolia Environnement comparative consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 have been adjusted accordingly for the retrospective adoption of IFRIC 12 in the comparative consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 presented.

Further, following comments made by the SEC Staff, some disclosure regarding 2004 changes in goodwill and other long-lived intangible and tangible assets have been included and the presentation of discontinued operations on the face of the 2004 consolidated income statement has been adjusted to reflect the equity of minority interests in discontinued operations as an allocation of net income to minority interests (rather than presenting discontinuing operations net of related minority interests).

IFRS as published by the IASB and IFRS as adopted by the EU differ in certain respects from USGAAP.


51.1

Summary of significant differences between US GAAP and IFRS


The principal differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP as they relate to the Group are discussed in further detail below.


Goodwill, net:


When adopting IFRS, in accordance with the provisions of IFRS 1, the Company elected not to reopen historical business combinations.  Because the accounting for business combinations under French GAAP prior to the date of transition was similar to what the accounting would have been had we restated these business combinations to apply IFRS 3, the Company therefore considers that restatement of historical business combinations would not have had a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.


Businesses sold by Vivendi Universal

Upon forming the Group in 1999, Vivendi Universal sold some subsidiaries and affiliates to the Group. According to previous GAAP, these transactions were at market value which, in some cases, resulted in the creation of additional goodwill. In accordance with provision of IFRS 1, the Group has elected not to restate business combinations prior to January 1, 2004.  There is no guidance under IFRS for accounting for common control transactions.  Had we applied IFRS 3 to Vivendi Universal, we would still have accounted for the transaction at fair value, as we had under French GAAP.  Had we not applied fair value, we would have accounted for the transaction at the historical cost basis, similar to the accounting under US GAAP.

Under U.S. GAAP, transfers of assets among entities under common control, including transfers of operating subsidiaries, are recorded at the predecessor’s historical cost basis.


Amortization of goodwill

Since January 1, 2004, in accordance with IFRS 3, the Group no longer amortizes goodwill.

Under US GAAP, goodwill is no longer amortized since January 1, 2002. This timing difference resulted in differences in book value of goodwill.


Impairment of goodwill

As required under both IFRS and US GAAP, the Group reviews the carrying value of the long-lived assets, including goodwill and other intangibles assets with indefinite life  at least annually. Under IFRS, goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite life are tested for impairment as part of a cash generating unit or a group of cash generating units, which, considering the Group’s organization, are our operating units.

Veolia Environnement is organized on the basis of operating units, mainly organized around a dual analysis through geographical zones and reporting segment. The group considers that these operating units also coincide with the reporting unit definition as set forth in FAS142:

·

the operating unit is one level below an operating segment (water, waste, energy, transportation)

·

each operating unit has its own chief operating officer

·

at the level of each operating unit, there are similar contractual arrangements and operating methods with public authorities which are the main clients

·

the operating unit constitutes a business for which discrete financial information is available and segment management regularly reviews the operating results of the operating unit.




Back to contents



As a result, there is no difference between our IFRS cash generating units to which goodwill have been allocated and US GAAP reporting units. However differences might result on goodwill impairment from the two step process under FAS 142 that differ from the IAS 36 approach.

Under IAS 36, goodwill is written off to the extent the carrying value of the cash generating unit exceeds its recoverable amount (the recoverable amount being defined as the higher of fair value less costs to sale and value in use, ie the present value of future cash flows expected to be derived from an asset or cash generating unit).

Under FAS 142, if the fair value of the reporting unit is lower than its carrying value, an impairment of good will is recognized and measured as the difference between the carrying value of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit and its implied fair value. Implied fair value of goodwill is measured as the amount of goodwill that would arise from the allocation of the fair value of the reporting unit to its identifiable assets and liabilities in a manner similar to a purchase accounting at the time of the impairment test.


Effect of disposal on goodwill, net


The differences presented above may lead to adjustments when some assets are disposed of.


Net investment in a foreign entity


As permitted by IFRS 1, the Group has elected to reverse as at January 1, 2004 the accumulated foreign Currency Translation Adjustment (CTA) on foreign investments, including the fair value net of tax of the hedging instruments classified in net investment hedge, against retained earnings, as part of retained earnings. Consequently, the gain or loss on subsequent disposal excludes CTA that arose before the date of transition to IFRS.

Under US GAAP, such exemption does not apply and the reclassification made under IFRS 1 has been reversed to maintain historical amounts and would subsequently impact the gain or loss recognized when such investments in a foreign entity are disposed of.


Tangible assets, components

Under IFRS, each part of a tangible asset with a cost that is significant in relation to the total cost of the item shall be depreciated separately. Every component identified is depreciated according to its own useful life.

Under US GAAP, part or components of tangible assets are not depreciated separately but over the life of the assets. Subsequent costs identified as a component of a main asset are expensed.


Provisions


Provisions for Contractual Commitments

As part of its obligations under public services contracts, the Group assumes responsibility for the maintenance and repair of installations of the publicly-owned utility networks it manages. The resulting maintenance and repair costs are analyzed in accordance with IAS 37 on provisions and, where necessary, a provision for contractual commitments is recognized.

Under US GAAP, the commitments are analyzed according to FAS5. The Company has anticipated the conclusions of FSP No. AUG-AIR-1 and does not accrue in advance for maintenance, repair and renewal expenses.


Onerous Contracts

Under IFRS, provisions are recognized on onerous executory contracts for the best estimate of the unavoidable losses, in accordance with IAS 37.

Under US GAAP, provisions for loss making executory contracts are not recognized and losses are recorded as incurred.


Assets retirement obligations

Under IFRS, reserves for site restoration are remeasured at each closing date by discounting the expected retirement costs at the rate in effect at the balance sheet date.

Under US GAAP and according to SFAS 143, these obligations are discounted at the rate in effect when the liability was initially recognized.


IFRIC4 / EITF 01-08 analysis

Under IFRS, the Group elected to early apply IFRIC 4 “Determining whether an arrangement contains a lease” on January 1, 2004. Certain industrial contracts and co-generation contracts have been considered as containing a lease that is accounted for as a financial lease in accordance with IAS 17. Consistent with IFRIC 4 the determination and the accounting of the financial asset as of January 1, 2004 has been made retrospectively.

Under US GAAP, Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 01-08 “Determining Whether an Arrangement Contains a Lease”, is effective prospectively for contracts entered into or significantly modified after January 1, 2004.  





Back to contents



IFRIC12 analysis

IFRIC 12 on the accounting treatment of service concession contracts has been early adopted by the Group in the 2006 consolidated financial statements.

A substantial portion of the Group’s assets are operated under concession or affermage contract granted by public sector authorities (“grantors”) and/or by concession companies purchased by the Group following full or partial privatization. The characteristics of these contracts vary significantly depending on the country and activity concerned.

These contracts generally relate to a service that could be qualified as of ‘general interest’ (i.e., service to the public such as wastewater treatment, waste, heating networks, or passenger transport). The contracts are operated under a strict regulatory environment that regulates the type of services to be provided, performance standards, arrangements for capital investments, prices practiced or mechanisms for adjusting tariffs. The infrastructure necessary to operate the service remains under the control of the grantor who grants use to its operator during the contract period. Finally, whenever the contract includes the initial construction of infrastructure, the infrastructure must be returned or reverted to the grantor at the end of the contract.

Pursuant to IFRIC 12, such infrastructures (and more generally all infrastructures in the scope of IFRIC 12) are not recognized as assets of the operator as property, plant and equipment but either as financial assets (“financial asset model”) and/or as intangible assets (“intangible asset model”) depending on the consideration given by the grantor to the operator (ie as financial asset to the extent the operator has an unconditional right to receive cash from or at the direction of the grantor and otherwise as an intangible asset). In addition, over the construction phase, revenue is recognised, regardless of the nature of the consideration received or receivable from the grantor.


Under US GAAP, such infrastructures continue to be recognized as PPE similar to leasehold improvement. Revenue is recognized when service is delivered along with operating the infrastructure.

Retirement plans and other post-employment benefits(excluding medical insurance coverage of retirees)

2009

2008

2007

2006

Benefit obligation at year end

(1,770.1)

(1,522.0)

(1,733.4)

(1,836.0)

Fair value of plan assets at year end

1,101.9

901.1

1,242.7

1,220.8

Funded status

(668.2)

(620.9)

(490.7)

(615.2)

Actuarial gains (losses) / experience adjustments on obligations

(11.7)

8.8

(0.7)

3.4

% of the benefit obligation

0.66%

-0.58%

0.04%

-0.19%

Actuarial gains (losses) / experience adjustments on plan assets

79.2

(219.6)

(5.6)

21.5


Medical insurance coverage of retirees

2009

2008

2007

2006

Benefit obligation at year end

(41.5)

(41.7)

(41.0)

(53.8)

Fair value of plan assets at year end

 

-

-

-

Funded status

(41.5)

(41.7)

(41.0)

(53.8)

Actuarial gains (losses) / experience adjustments on obligations

0.5

1.9

1.9

-0.7

% of the benefit obligation

-1.20%

-4.56%

-4.63%

1.30%

Actuarial gains (losses) / experience adjustments on plan assets

-

-

-

-


The cumulative amounts ofactuarial gains and losses on obligations and assets recognized in other comprehensive income and the change in the asset ceiling are as follows:

 

2009

2008

2007

Cumulative amount as of January 1

(185.8)

(48.3)

(172.7)

Change during the period

(61.7)

(137.5)

124.4

Cumulative amount as of December 31

(247.5)

(185.8)

(48.3)


NOTE 31

Main acquisitions

31.1

Acquisitions in 2009

Acquisitions in 2009 with related net cash flows of less than €100 million represent business combination costs of €195 million. These acquisitions contributed €110 million to Group revenue in 2009.

In general, goodwill balances are justified by synergies with existing operations in the Group and future developments.

31.2

Acquisitions in 2008

Acquired asset and liability fair values recorded at the end of 2008 in the opening balance sheets of 2008 acquisitions not yet definitive as of December 31, 2008 (Tianjin Shibei at Veolia Eau-CGE in China, Bartin Aero Recycling Group at Veolia Propreté, and the Praterm Group at Veolia Energie in Poland) were not materially changed during the 12-month allocation period following their acquisition date.



F-114



Back to Contents



NOTE 32

Construction contracts

As described in Note 1.23, Veolia recognizes its construction contracts under the percentage of completion method. At each period-end, a statement per contract compares the amount of costs incurred, plus profits (including any provisions for losses to completion) with the intermediary billings: “Construction contracts in progress / Assets” is therefore a contract for which the costs incurred and profits recognized exceed the billing issued.

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December31, 2008

As of
December 31,2007

Construction contracts in progress / Assets (A)

358.7

495.6

593.8

Construction contracts in progress / Liabilities (B)

292.4

332.2

232.0

Construction contracts in progress / net (A) – (B)

66.3

163.4

361.8

Costs incurred plus income and losses recognized to date (C)

5,413.7

4,404.8

4,068.7

Amounts billed (D)

5,347.4

4,241.4

3,706.9

Construction contracts in progress / net (C) – (D)

66.3

163.4

361.8

Customer advances

36.8

355.8

41.2


NOTE 33

Operating leases

The Group enters into operating leases (mainly for transportation equipment and constructions).

The future minimum lease payments under operating leases amount to €2,753.7 million as of December 31, 2009, compared to €2,530.4 million as of December 31, 2008 and €2,190.0 million as of December 31, 2007.

As of December 31, 2009, future minimum lease payments under these contracts were as follows:

(€ million)

Operating lease

2010

567.7

2011 & 2012

864.5

2013 & 2014

624.6

2015 and thereafter

696.9

Total future minimum lease payments

2,753.7


Lease payments for the period

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31, 2007

Minimum lease payments expensed in the period

630.9

609.7

523.4

Contingent rent expensed in the period

18.7

13.6

17.1

Total lease payments for the period

649.6

623.3

540.5


Sub-lease revenue is not material.

Assets leased under operating leases

The value of assets concerned by operating leases within the Group is not material



F-115



Back to Contents


NOTE 34

Proportionately consolidated companies

Summarized financial information in respect of proportionately consolidated companies is set out below (Group part):

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31, 2007

Non-current assets

8,188.4

7,682.7

6,757.3

Current assets

3,984.1

3,670.8

3,115.5

Total assets

12,172.5

11,353.5

9,872.8

Equity attributable to owners of the Company 

3,128.1

2,910.7

2,295.9

Equity attributable to non-controlling interests

915.1

801.6

895.5

Non-current liabilities

3,295.8

3,016.6

2,650.8

Current liabilities

4,833.4

4,624.6

4,030.6

Total equity and liabilities

12,172.4

11,353.5

9,872.8


(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31, 2007

Income Statement data

   

Revenue

5,520.3

5,481.1

4,623.7

Operating income

636.8

612.6

659.9

Net income for the year

326.5

261.2

322.9

Financing data

  

 

Operating cash flows

819.8

712.3

567.0

Investing cash flows

(644.9)

(621.7)

(566.8)

Financing cash flows

(316.1)

(533.2)

(289.9)


The most material proportionately consolidated are as follows:

BWB (Berlin water services company) in the Water Division in Germany is 50% consolidated and contributed revenue of €602 million, operating income of €225 million, net assets of €2,735 million and net debt of €1,498 million;

Dalkia International is 75.81% consolidated and contributed revenue of €2,282 million, operating income of €158 million and net assets of €1,857 million;

The Proactiva Group in South America contributed revenue of €202 million, operating income of €26 million and net assets of €108 million;

The Shenzhen and Tianjin Shibei contracts in the Water Division in China are 25% and 49% consolidated respectively and contributed €138 million and €48 million respectively to revenue and €237 million and €150 million respectively to net assets;

A change in the governance of the partnership with Mubadala Development Company on December 22, 2009 led to a change in consolidation method (from full to proportionate consolidation) for the activity of the Water Division in North Africa and the Middle East. This change in governance also resulted in financial debt restructuring, whereby the Group granted a 16-year loan for €121 million at a fixed rate of 5.7% (market conditions).



F-116



Back to Contents


NOTE 35

Tax audits

In the normal course of their business, the Group entities in France and abroad are subjected to regular tax audits.

In France, the tax authorities have carried out various tax audits in respect of both consolidated tax groups and individual entities, including a significant number of reviews focusing specifically on local taxes. The tax audits concerning the major Group companies in France, including Veolia Environnement SA, were closed in 2009. To date, none of these reviews have led to material liabilities to the tax authorities in excess of amounts estimated during the review of tax risks and the booking of provisions in accordance with IAS 37. Certain amounts are still being negotiated with the French tax authorities.

Outside France, the Group is present in numerous countries and is constantly subject to tax audits. Among the countries where the Group has a strong presence, tax audits were in progress as of December 31, 2008 in Germany and Morocco were completed in 2009. The liabilities arising from these tax audits had been anticipated and provided for in accordance with IAS 37.

Tax audits are still in progress, particularly in Italy. Discussions continued in 2009 with the Italian tax authorities. Where necessary, revised assessments and identified uncertain tax positions in respect of which a revised assessment has not been yet issued are adequately provided, and provision amounts are regularly reviewed in accordance with IAS37 criteria.

In the United States, the Group has launched a pre-filing agreement procedure with the Internal Revenue Service (I.R.S) in order to validate the amount of tax losses as of December 31, 2006, following the reorganization of Water Division activities (“Worthless Stock Deduction”). This reorganization led to the recognition of ordinary losses resulting from the operations and disposal of former U.S. Filter activities in respect of fiscal years 1999 to 2004, in an amount which could exceed U.S.$ 4 billion. No major event took place in 2009 that could call into question the Group’s position.

NOTE 36

Off-balance sheet commitments

Specific commitments given

Specific Berlin contract commitments

Under the Berlin water contract, the Group plans to acquire easement rights of passage for water pipes from landowners.

The gross amount of this investment could reach €426 million (50%), approximately €175 million of which would be borne by the Berlin Lander, representing a net commitment of €250 million.

Given the uncertain nature of estimating these easement rights, this commitment was retained off-balance sheet as of December 31, 2007.

More precise estimates were performed in 2008, producing a valuation of €113 million (100%), including a portion, estimated at €57 million, to be reimbursed by the Berlin Lander. The Group therefore recognized an asset and operating liability of €113 million. As these rights vest over the period to 2011, the amounts paid will be recorded, net of amounts reimbursed by the Berlin Lander, in financial assets and remunerated pursuant to the contract.

Agreements with EDF

Veolia Environnement granted EDF a call option covering all of its Dalkia shares in the event an EDF competitor takes control of the company.

Likewise EDF granted Veolia Environnement a call option covering all of its Dalkia shares, exercisable in the event of a change in the legal status of EDF and should a Veolia Environnement competitor, acting alone or in concert, take control of EDF. Failing an agreement on the share transfer price, this would be decided by an expert.



F-117



Back to Contents


Other commitments given

Other commitments and contingencies include neither collateral guarantees supporting borrowings (see Note 38) nor specific commitments and contingencies described above.

Other off-balance sheet commitments break down as follows:

(€ million)

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2008

As of December 31, 2009

Maturing in

Less than
1 year

1 to 5 years

More than
5 years

Operational guarantees including performance bonds

5,591.4

6,624.9

6,950.9

2,442.4

2,418.8

2,089,7

Financial guarantees

 835.6

667.5

679.4

229.4

275.8

174.2

Debt guarantees

355.6

303.0

258.3

89.3

113.6

55.4

Vendor warranties received

480.0

364.5

421.1

140.1

162.2

118.8

Commitments given

617.1

507.8

431.6

283.7

97.6

50.3

Purchase commitments

589.9

476.5

425.1

277.8

97.6

49.7

Sales commitments

27.2

31.3

6.5

5.9

-

0.6

Other commitments given

957.3

912.7

1,065.3

489.4

267.2

308.7

Letters of credit

573.8

706.7

604.5

329.1

152.1

123.3

Other commitments given

383.5

206.0

460.8

160.3

115.1

185.4

Other commitments given

8,001.4

8,712.9

9,127.2

3,444.9

3,059.4

2,622.9


Operational guarantees: operational or operating guarantees encompass all commitments not relating to the financing of operations, required in respect of contracts and markets and more generally the operations and activities of Group companies. Such guarantees include bid bonds accompanying tender offers, advance payment bonds and completion or performance bonds given on the signature of contracts or concession arrangements.

Debt guarantees: these relate to guarantees given to financial institutions in connection with the financial debts of non-consolidated companies, equity associates, or the non-consolidated portion of financial debts of proportionately consolidated companies when the commitment covers the entire amount.

Vendor warranties: these include warranties linked to the sale in 2004 of Water activities in the United States in the amount of €246.5 million.

Purchase commitments: these include commitments given by Group companies to purchase shares in other companies or to invest. As of December 31, 2009, these commitments mainly concerned the Energy Services Division (€82.4 million), the Environmental Services Division (€23.0 million), the Transportation Division (€41.1 million) and the Water Division (€241.7 million).

Letters of credit: letters of credit delivered by financial institutions to Group creditors, customers and suppliers guaranteeing operating activities.

These off-balance sheet commitments notably include:

- Off-balance sheet commitments and site restoration provisions:

Pursuant to environmental texts and legislation concerning the operation of waste storage facilities, the Group is obliged to provide financial guarantees to local authorities/government agencies. These guarantees notably encompass the restoration and supervision of the site during 30 years or more, depending on national legislation (currently 60 years in the United Kingdom), following its operation.

In this context, performance bonds, letters of credit, etc. are issued to local authorities and other public bodies.

Depending on the contract, these guarantees cover the costs necessary for the restoration of all or part of the site and the supervision of the site during 30 years.

These guarantees are quantified in accordance with legally or contractually-defined procedures. These guarantees, which are given in their total amount from the start of operations, expire at the end of the commitment (termination of restoration work and site supervision).



F-118



Back to Contents


Therefore, the amount of our commitment for the restoration and supervision of waste storage facilities is in general different from the amount of the provision recorded in the Group accounts (see Note 1.13).

Provisions calculated by the Group are based on different valuations (based on internal policies regarding site security and designed for optimal environmental protection), which take into account the progressive nature of the obligation: operation of the storage facility results in progressive damage to the site and, as such, a related liability is recognized as the facility is operated.

If the amount of the commitment is less than the provision at the balance sheet date, an off-balance sheet commitment is not disclosed. Conversely, if the amount of the commitment is greater than the provision, an off-balance sheet commitment is disclosed in the amount not provided.

-engineering and construction activities:

Total commitments given in respect of construction activities in the Water Division (Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies) amount to €2,823.6 million as of December 31, 2009, compared to €2,969.8 million as of December 31, 2008 and €1,630.4 million as of December 31, 2007.

Total commitments received (see below) in respect of these same activities amount to €757.2 million as of December 31, 2009, compared to €856.9 million as of December 31, 2008 and €866.2 million as of December 31, 2007.

Commitments given and received in respect of the five principal contracts account for approximately 80% of total commitments.

-commitments given in respect of concession contracts:

Pursuant to public service contracts with a public entity, the Group may be called on/obliged to invest in infrastructures that will then be operated and remunerated in accordance with contractual terms and conditions.

The contractual commitment may concern both the financing of installations and infrastructures to be used in operations and also the maintenance and replacement of infrastructures necessary to operations.

An analysis of the accounting treatment of these commitments is presented in Notes 1.21, 1.14 and 17.

Expenditure relating to the replacement or restoration of installations is monitored and recognized through any timing differences between the total contractual commitment over the contract term and its realization, in accordance with the IAS 37 on Provisions.

Expenditure relating to the construction, maintenance and restoration of concession assets is reviewed with respect to IFRIC 12 and detailed in Note 1.21.

Firm commodity purchase commitments:

As part of supply management and cost optimization, certain Group subsidiaries may be required, depending on their activities, to set-up derivatives to fix the cost of commodity supplies where the contracts do not offer appropriate protection (see Note 29.1.3) or contract forward purchases or sales of commodities.

Firm commodity purchase commitments mainly concern:

coal in the Energy Services Division in Central European countries

gas in the Energy Services Division (mainly in France) and in the Water Division

electricity in the Water Division

With regard to both gas and electricity, the number of contracts signed enables the Group to significantly reduce political and counterparty risk.

forward purchases of fuel are primarily contracted by the Transportation Division (SNCM).



F-119



Back to Contents


Other commitments given break down by Division as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31, 2007

Water

6,036.4

5,891.8

4,368.3

Environmental Services

831.1

901.7

1,171.1

Energy Services

700.3

538.1

755.7

Transportation

533.2

415.8

398.3

Proactiva

45.2

50.6

39.8

Holding companies

942.0

891.3

1,241.5

Other

39.0

23.6

26.7

Total

9,127.2

8,712.9

8,001.4


Lease contracts entered into by the Group are analyzed in Notes 17 and 33.

Contingent assets and liabilities relating to legal or arbitration proceedings

On September 12, 2008, a suburban train operated by Connex Railroad LLC, a Veolia Transport subsidiary, on behalf of the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA), collided with a Union Pacific freight train in Chatsworth, California. This accident resulted in 25 fatalities and a significant number of injuries. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), a federal agency, with which Connex Railroad is cooperating, reached a preliminary conclusion that the two causes of the accident were, first, lack of attention by the engineer, who did not observe a red light and, second, the fact that the SCRRA had not installed an automatic train braking system in compliance with prior recommendations of the NTSB. Actions seeking an undetermined amount of total damages have been filed by the heirs of the deceased passengers and the majority of injured passengers, in the courts of the state of California in Los Angeles, against Connex Railroad LLC, its parent company, Veolia Transportation Inc., the SCRRA and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. These actions have been consolidated into a single case. A hearing specifically dedicated to the issue of liability is scheduled for November 2010. At the same time, Connex Railroad LLC and the SCRRA have brought before the federal courts in California their disputes concerning their respective contractual liability in connection with the suits filed as a result of this accident and are still awaiting a hearing date. A U.S. federal statute limits the total amount of damages that may be awarded for injuries and property damage arising from a single passenger rail accident to U.S.$200 million. Notice of this accident has been given to the relevant insurers of the Group. At this point, the Group is unable to determine whether the financial consequences of this accident could significantly affect its financial position or results.

Furthermore, the Group is subject to several other litigations in the normal course of its business. In accordance with IAS 37 criteria, management does not consider it appropriate to record a provision or recognize deferred income in respect of these legal or arbitration proceedings at the balance sheet date, due to the uncertain nature of their outcome.

Commitments received

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31, 2007

Guarantees received

1,756.3

2,082.0

1,459.7

Debt guarantees

303.4

351.6

266.6

Vendor warranties received

142.0

294.8

53.6

Other guarantees received

1,310.9

1,435.6

1,139.5


The commitments notably consist of commitments received from our partners in respect of construction contracts.

The decrease in 2009 was mainly due to the expiry of a warranty obtained from an acquisition in the Environmental Services Division, the partial terminations in the Construction activity of Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies and the cancellation of the guarantee received from the British Treasury for a credit line repaid at the start of the year.

In addition, the Group has undrawn medium and short-term credit lines and syndicated loans in the amount of €4.7 billion (see Note 29.3).



F-120



Back to Contents


NOTE 37

Greenhouse gas emission rights

The process governing the grant and valuation of these rights is presented in Note 1.25, Greenhouse gas emission rights.

The position in 2009 is as follows:

Volume in thousands of metric tons

As of January 1, 2009

Entries into the consolidation scope

Granted

Purchased / sold / cancelled

Consumed

As of December 31, 2009

Total

1,363

433

13,504

441

(12,187)

3,554


Similarly to 2008, the Group entered into new swaps of EUA II and CER in order to benefit from market opportunities.

At the end of 2007 and during 2008, the Group entered into allowance loan transactions (EUA II and CER) effective in 2008 with surrender in 2012. The commission received on allowance loans is recorded on receipt as deferred income and recognized in the Income Statement on a straight-line basis over the loan term.

Entries into the scope of consolidation concern Energy Services Division acquisitions in France.

Phase II rights granted free of charge for fiscal years 2010-2012 are estimated at €515 million. Future allocations were measured using the spot price as of December 31, 2009.

NOTE 38

Collateral given supporting borrowings

As of December 31, 2009, the Group has given €699 million of collateral guarantees in support of borrowings. The breakdown by type of asset is as follows (€ million):

Type of pledge / mortgage

Amount pledged (a)

Total consolidated statement of financial position amount (b)

Corresponding %

(a) / (b)

Intangible assets

5

1,438

0.35%

Property, plant and equipment

151

9,382

1.61%

Financial assets*

504

-

-

Total non-current assets

660

-

-

Current assets

39

20,222

0.19%

Total assets

699

-

-


*

As a majority of financial assets pledged as collateral are shares of consolidated subsidiaries and other financial assets, the ratio is not significant.




F-121



Back to Contents


The breakdown by maturity is as follows:

(€ million)

As of December 31,2007

As of December 31, 2008

As of December 31, 2009

Maturing in

Less than
1 year

1 to 5
years

More than
5 years

Intangible assets

2

2

5

-

1

4

Property, plant and equipment

293

225

151

19

40

92

Mortgage pledge

15

16

37

3

3

31

Other PP&E pledge(1)

278

209

114

16

37

61

Financial assets(2)

313

588

504

10

65

429

Current assets

26

109

39

3

9

27

Pledges on receivables

23

108

39

3

9

27

Pledges on inventories

3

1

0

-

-

-

Total

634

924

699

32

115

552


(1)

mainly equipment and traveling systems.

(2)

including non-consolidated investments of €198 million and other financial assets (primarily operating financial assets) of €306 million as of December 31, 2009.


NOTE 39

Related-party transactions

The purpose of this note is to present related-party transactions.

39.1

“Related party” concept

Group related parties comprise, in accordance with IAS 24, Related Party Disclosures, the companies over which the Group exercises control, joint control or significant influence (joint ventures and equity associates), shareholders who exercise joint control over group joint ventures, minority shareholders who exercise significant influence over group subsidiaries, key management personnel of the group and the companies over which the latter exercise control, joint control or significant influence or in which they hold significant voting rights.

In addition, as the share capital of the Group is widely held, certain shareholders holding a small stake in the share capital are nonetheless considered related parties.

39.2

Compensation and related benefits of key management personnel

Group Executive Committee members and directors represent the key management personnel of the Group.

The following table summarizes amounts due by the Group in respect of compensation and other benefits granted to key management personnel:

(€ million)

As of
December 31,
2009

As of
December 31,
2008

As of
December 31,
2007

Short-term benefits, excluding employer contributions(a)

4.7

8.2

6.9

Employer contributions

2.0

3.2

2.5

Post-employment benefits(b)

1.1

1.2

1.0

Other long-term benefits(c)

-

-

-

Share-based payments

0.6

1.0

1.6

Contract termination payments

-

-

-

Total

8.4

13.6

12.0

(a)

Fixed and variable compensation, employee benefits and directors fees. Variable compensations comprise amounts due in respect of the fiscal year and paid during the next fiscal year.

(b)

Current service costs.

(c)

Other compensation vested but payable in the long-term.




F-122



Back to Contents


All the Board of Directors members, except the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, only receive as compensation director’s fees from Veolia Environnement and its controlled companies. Director’s fees paid to Directors, excluding the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, totaled €771,795 in 2009, €771,952 in 2008 and €741,380 in 2007.

Item 6 of this annual report filed on Form 20-F contains detailed disclosures on compensation and benefits paid to key management personnel of the Group.

39.3

Transactions with other related parties

39.3.1

Relations with proportionately consolidated companies and equity associates

The Group granted a loan of €1,614.9 million to Dalkia International and its subsidiaries Siram and Dalkia Pologne, which are proportionately consolidated at 75.81% The non-group portion of this loan is recorded in assets in the Group consolidated statement of financial position in the amount of €390.8 million (see Note 11 Other non-current financial assets).

In December 2009, the Group sold its investment in Compagnie Méridionale de Navigation (CMN) which was consolidated using the equity method.

In addition, given the Group’s businesses, operating flows between companies are generally limited to companies operating in the same country. As such, the level of operating transactions between the Group and proportionately consolidated companies is not material.

However, certain contractual agreements within the Water Division, notably in Asia and Central Europe, impose the existence of a holding company (generally equity accounted or proportionately consolidated) and companies carrying the operating contract (generally fully consolidated). These complex legal arrangements generate “asset supply” flows between the companies generally jointly controlled or subject to significant influence and the companies controlled by the Group. Assets are generally supplied for a specific remuneration that may or may not include the maintenance of the installations in good working order or the technical improvement of the installations.

39.3.2

Relations with Group shareholders

Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations (with a 9.58% interest in share capital).

The Chief Executive Officer of this financial institution is represented on the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement.

The Group had the following relations with the Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations during fiscal 2009:

the financing agreements between the two groups bear interest at market conditions.

in connection with the ongoing combination at the year-end between Veolia Transport and Transdev.

Electricité de France (with a 3.70% interest in share capital as of December 31, 2009).

On November 25, 2009, Mr. Proglio was appointed Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the EDF Group by ministerial decree; he also acts as Chairman of the Veolia Environnement Group Board of Directors from November 27, 2009 (publication date of the decree).

EDF Group has a 3.70% interest in Veolia Environnement, a 34% interest in Dalkia and a 25% interest in Dalkia International. In accordance with the Decree 97-07, EDF purchases electricity produced in France by Dalkia cogeneration power plants at market conditions. Electricity sold by Dalkia to EDF in 2007, 2008 and 2009 totaled €521.7 million, €608.4 million and €568.7 million, respectively.



F-123



Back to Contents


There are under certain conditions cross options between Veolia Environnement and EDF for all the securities held by each party in case of taking control of one or the other (see Note 36 Off-balance sheet commitments).

BNP Paribas (with a 0.57% interest in share capital as of December 31, 2009)

The Chief Executive Officer of BNP Paribas is represented on the Board of Directors of Veolia. The financing agreements between the two groups bear interest at market conditions.

Société Générale (with a 0.15% interest in share capital as of December 31, 2009)

The financing agreements between the two groups bear interest at market conditions.

Mr. Bouton, member of the Veolia Environnement Board of Directors, is no longer Chairman of the Board of Directors of Société Générale as of May 6, 2009.

Vivendi Universal undertook to pay an indemnity to Veolia Environnement in respect of the financial management of replacement expenses and then transferred this obligation to Société Générale under a perfect delegation contract on December 21, 2004. As such, Vivendi Universal no longer has an obligation to Veolia Environnement with respect thereto.

Conversely, Société Générale, considered a related party, is liable to Veolia Environnement in this respect for a maximum amount of €17.6 million as of December 31, 2008, which was claimed in its entirety as of December 31, 2009.

39.3.3

Relations with other related parties

Relations with Lazard, Groupama, ENI and Saint Gobain

These Groups and Véolia Environnement have common directors.

Any business relations between these groups and Veolia are maintained at market conditions.

Financial Instruments

Currency

Amount

Less

Under IFRS, the option to convert the convertible bond into ordinary shares is initially classified separately as an equity instrument. The Group first determines the carrying amount of the liability component of the convertible bonds by measuring the fair value of a similar liability that does not have an associated equity component. The carrying amount of the equity instrument is then determined by deducting the fair value of the financial liability from the fair value of the compound financial instrument as a whole. The financial debt is accounted for at amortized cost.

than

Under US GAAP, the convertible bond is classified as financial debt for the entire amount.


Share-based payments

Under IFRS, the fair value of plans at grant date is recorded as an expense against equity at the date the employee or the counter-party renders service. According to IFRS2, only grants of shares and share options that were granted after 7 November 2002 and for which rights were not vested at January 2005 are evaluated in personal costs.year

Under US GAAP, the Group has elected the modified-prospective-transition method when adopting  SFAS 123 (R) from January 1 2006. Under this method, plans granted prior to but not vested, on January 1, 2006 are recognized in the  2005 and 2004 comparative financial statements using the intrinsic value method in accordance with Accounting Principle Board opinion No. 25, Accounting for stock issued to employees and Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation No 44 and the related compensation expense based on the fair value of the plans at their grant date in accordance with FAS 123 is disclosed in the notes together with the related pro forma net income. APB 25 defined plans relating to the grant or sale of common shares to employees as compensatory if such plans are not open to substantially all employees or do not require the employee to make a reasonable investment in the shares, usually defined as no le ss
5 years

More
than 85% of the market value at the grant date. If a plan is deemed to be compensatory, Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25 requires the compensation arising from such plans be measured based on the intrinsic value of the shares granted or sold to employees. For fixed plans compensation is the difference between the exercise price of the stock option and the market value of the corresponding shares at the grant date. For compensatory stock option plans, compensation is recognized in the period for which the relative service is performed.
5 years

As mentioned, the modified-prospective-transition method has not been early applied: For plans that were granted or that vested from January 1, 2006, the Group has adopted SFAS123 (R) that requires all share-based payments to employees to be recognized as compensation expense and be measured at the fair value of the award on the date of grant.Total
assets

Total
liabilities

Pension PlansForward purchases

Under IFRS, the Group has decided to apply IAS19 (revised) as of January 1, 2005 and, thus, actuarial profits and losses are recorded immediately through equity and there is no minimum liability requirement.NOK

The Group has adopted FAS158 that is applicable to all post-employement benefit plans, including pensions, retirement indemnities, retiree medical care and other post-employment benefit plans such as payments towards water or electricity bills for retirees. It modifies the accounting for post-employment benefits from FAS87 and 106 from December 31, 2006 (without retrospective application).115.3

Under US GAAP, for periods prior to transition to FAS 158 on December 31, 2006:20.3

64.2

30.8

7.1

- unrecognized actuarial gains and losses  were amortized as a component of net pension cost of the year if, as of the beginning of the year that unrecognized net gain or loss exceeded 10% of the greater of the projected benefit obligation on the fair value of the plan assets.

Forward sales

USD

15.6

4.2

11.4

- if the accumulated benefit obligation exceeds the fair value of plan assets by an amount in excess of any accrued or prepaid pension cost reported, the employer shall recognize in the statement of financial position a liability that  is at least equal to the unfunded accumulated benefit obligation. If an additional minimum liability is recognized an equal amount shall be recognized as an intangible asset, provided



1.0


Back to contents


-


Forward purchases

that the asset shall not exceed the amount of unrecognized prior service cost. If an additional liability required to be recognized exceeds unrecognized prior service cost, the excess shall be reported as a reduction of equity.USD

From December 31, 2006, FAS158 requires that an entity:9.8

a)9.8

recognizes the funded status of benefit plan, defined as the difference between the fair value of the plan assets and the projected benefit obligation, in its balance sheet;-

b)-

recognize actuarial gains and losses in the period in which they occur through shareholders' equity (other comprehensive income);0.2

c)-

recognize prior service costs in the period in which they occur through shareholders' equity (other comprehensive income);Forward purchases

d)SEK

measure defined benefit obligations and assets at the balance sheet date (option already applied by the Group); and8.9

e)7.5

in addition, the notion of the minimum liability adjustment (MLA) no longer applies in US GAAP and consequently all existing MLA adjustments should be reversed.1.4

Prospectively, under US GAAP those items recognized through shareholders' equity are subsequently recognized as a component of net periodic benefit costs by debiting other comprehensive income, while under IFRS the initial recognition through equity does not affect subsequent income. Therefore, for US GAAP purposes, the Group will continue to apply the 'corridor' to amortize actuarial gains and losses. Similarly any prior service costs should be recognized through shareholders' equity and then amortized.-

Income tax-

In 2004, the adjustments of net income to conform US GAAP were mainly linked to the tax effect of the0.3

Forward purchases

HUF

4.3

4.3

-

-

0.5

-

Total foreign currency gain deemedderivatives

153.9

46.1

77.0

30.8

8.8

0.3


In 2009, Veolia Environnement Group decided to designate a certain number of currency transactions as hedges as defined by IAS 39.

The majority of the cash flow hedges presented above consist of currency hedges in respect of lease payments on a boat.



F-90



Back to Contents


28.2.4

Hedges of currency exposure in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position by derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

Fair value

As of December 31, 2009

(€ million)

Total

USD

GBP

NOK

SEK

KRW

Other

Forward purchases

(0.9)

(0.7)

(1.0)

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.8

Currency receiver swaps

10.3

8.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.0

1.7

Total currency swaps and forward purchases

9.4

7.5

(0.8)

0.1

0.1

0.0

2.5

Forward sales

(17.4)

2.0

(0.1)

0.1

0.0

(18.5)

(0.9)

Currency payer swaps

(49.1)

1.4

(17.6)

(11.1)

(11.4)

0.0

(10.4)

Total currency swaps and forward sales

(66.5)

3.4

(17.7)

(11.0)

(11.4)

(18.5)

(11.3)

Call options

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Put options

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total currency options

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

(57.1)

10.9

(18.5)

(10.9)

(11.3)

(18.5)

(8.8)


Hedges as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:

Faire value

As of December 31, 2008

(€ million)

Total

HKD

NOK

PLN

Other

Forward purchases

(11.6)

-

(5.0)

(2.3)

(4.3)

Currency receiver swaps

(20.6)

-

-

(1.7)

(18.9)

Total currency swaps and forward purchases

(32.2)

-

(5.0)

(4.0)

(23.2)

Forward sales

(1.6)

-

-

2.2

(3.8)

Currency payer swaps

86.8

28.3

19.3

12.0

27.2

Total currency swaps and forward sales

85.2

28.3

19.3

14.2

23.4

Call options

-

-

-

-

-

Put options

(2.0)

-

-

-

(2.0)

Total currency options

(2.0)

-

-

-

(2.0)

Total derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting(*)

51.0

28.3

14.3

10.2

(1.8)


Fair value

As of December 31, 2007

(€ million)

Total

USD

GBP

Other

Forward purchases

(4.2)

(4.5)

(0.1)

0.4

Currency receiver swaps

(1.8)

-

-

(1.8)

Total currency swaps and forward purchases

(6.0)

(4.5)

(0.1)

(1.4)

Forward sales

9.2

10.2

-

(1.0)

Currency payer swaps

11.5

5.1

3.2

3.2

Total currency swaps and forward sales

20.7

15.3

3.2

2.2

Call options

(0.4)

(0.4)

-

-

Put options

0.8

0.8

-

-

Total currency options

0.4

0.4

-

-

Total derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting(*)

15.1

11.2

3.1

0.8


(*)

Net fair value (Assets–Liabilities) excluding embedded derivatives

The above portfolio of foreign currency derivatives was mainly contracted by Veolia Environnement SA to hedge its foreign currency-denominated net debt (comprising foreign currency-denominated borrowings and foreign currency-denominated inter-company loans and borrowings).



F-91



Back to Contents


28.3

Commodity derivatives

As of December 31, 2009, the fair value of commodity derivatives totaled €63.9 million in assets and €43.6 million in liabilities.

  

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31,2008

(€ million)

Note

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Commodity derivatives

 

63.9

43.6

89.4

107.3

Electricity

 

53.1

18.3

56.3

18.3

Fuel

 

9.1

7.1

22.5

46.5

CO2

 

0.8

0.4

2.1

2.7

Coal

 

0.9

15.5

8.2

15.6

Other

 

-

2.3

0.3

24.2

Pursuant to IAS 39, these derivatives break down as follows:

  

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31,2008

(€ million)

Note

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Commodity derivatives

 

63.9

43.6

89.4

107.3

Fair value hedges

  

0.3

 

2.3

Cash flow hedges

 

10.0

23.9

32.1

64.3

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

 

53.9

19.4

57.3

40.8


Material contract notional amounts (electricity – see Note 1.24) are as follows.

28.3.1

Electricity

  

Notional contract amount as of

December 31, 2009 by maturity

(€ million)

 

Total

Less than
one year

1 to 5 years

More than
five years

Electricity purchase options:

in Gwh

13,196

1,052

2,934

9,210

 

in € million

696.0

55.2

158.4

482.4

Electricity sales commitments:

in Gwh

3,051

1,110

1,941

-

 

in € million

215.2

72.3

142.9

-


Purchase options cover the period 2010 to 2025 and represent a notional amount of €52.3 million, based on valuation assumptions at the year end. Sales commitments cover the period 2010 to 2011 and represent a notional amount of €17.7 million, based on the same valuation assumptions.

A 10% increase or decrease in the price of electricity (all other things being equal) would have an impact on net income of +€1.2 million and -€0.9 million, respectively.



F-92



Back to Contents



  

Notional contract amount as of

December 31, 2008 by maturity

(€ million)

 

Total

Less than
one year

1 to 5 years

More than
five years

Electricity purchase options:

in Gwh

12,854

868

3,063

8,923

 

in € million

667.5

41.9

159.5

466.1

Electricity sales commitments:

in Gwh

3,817

824

2,993

-

 

in € million

250.6

38.2

212.4

-


  

Notional contract amount as of

December 31, 2007by maturity

(€ million)

 

Total

Less than
one year

1 to 5 years

More than
five years

Electricity purchase options:

in Gwh

15,280

935

3,445

10,900

 

in € million

749.6

50.3

169.3

530.0

Electricity sales commitments:

in Gwh

3,202

1,032

2,170

-

 

in € million

177.1

55.7

121.4

-


28.3.2

Greenhouse gas emission rights

Other transactions not qualifying for hedge accounting relate to contracts swapping greenhouse gas emission rights for Carbon Emission certificates, maturing at the end of 2010, 2011 and 2012. These transactions are recorded in assets in the amount of €0.5 million and the impact on the Consolidated Income Statement is a net income of €0.8 million. 



F-93



Back to Contents


NOTE 29

Financial risk management

Group objectives and organization

The Group is exposed to the following financial risks in the course of its operating and financial activities:

Market risks, presented in Note 29.1:

-

interest-rate risk, presented in Note 29.1.1 (interest-rate fair value hedges, cash flow hedges and derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting),

-

foreign exchange risk, presented in Note 29.1.2 (hedges of a net investment in a foreign operation, hedges of balance sheet foreign exchange exposure by derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting, embedded derivatives, overall foreign exchange risk exposure),

-

commodity risk, presented in Note 29.1.3 (fuel and electricity risks, greenhouse gas emission rights).

Equity risk, presented in Note 29.2.

Liquidity risk, presented in Note 29.3

Credit risk, presented in Note 29.4

29.1

Market risk management

29.1.1

Management of interest rate risk

The financing structure of the Group exposes it naturally to the risk of interest rate fluctuations. As such, floating-rate debt impacts future financial results.

Short-term debt is primarily indexed to short-term indexes (Eonia for the treasury note program and Euribor/Libor for the main short-term credit lines). Medium and long-term debt comprises both fixed and floating-rate debt.

The Group manages a fixed/floating rate position in each currency in order to limit the impact of interest rate fluctuations on its net income and to optimize the cost of debt. For this purpose, it uses interest rate swap and swaption instruments.

These swaps may be classified as fair value hedges or cash flow hedges. An interest rate fair value hedge changes fixed-rate financial assets or liabilities into floating rate financial assets or liabilities in order to protect against changes in their fair value. A cash flow hedge protects against changes in the value of cash flows associated with assets or liabilities.

The following table shows the interest-rate exposure of gross debt (defined as the sum of non-current borrowings, current borrowings and bank overdrafts and other cash position items) before and after hedging.

 

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31,2007

(€ million)

Out-
standings

% total
debt

Out-
standings

% total
debt

Out-
standings

% total
debt

Fixed rate

15,971.5

77.0%

14,055.2

69.0%

12,129.7

66.5%

Floating rate

4,770.6

23.0%

6,322.6

31.0%

6,111.0

33.5%

Gross debt before hedging

20,742.1

100.0%

20,377.8

100.0%

18,240.7

100.0%

Fixed rate

10,808.8

51.3%

9,960.8

48.0%

9,759.2

53.6%

Capped floating rate (active caps)

0.0

0.0%

36.0

0.2%

1,401.7

7.7%

Floating rate

10,276.5

48.7%

10,752.5

51.8%

7,052.1

38.7%

Gross debt after hedging and fair value remeasurement of fixed-rate debt

21,085.3

100.0%

20,749.3

100.0%

18,213.0

100.0%

Fair value adjustments to (asset)/liability hedging derivatives

(343.2)

 

(371.5)

 

27.7

 

Gross debt at amortized cost

20,742.1

 

20,377.8

 

18,240.7

 




F-94



Back to Contents


Total gross debt as of December 31, 2009 after hedging was 51.3% fixed-rate and 48.7% floating-rate. No caps were active as of December 31, 2009. Excluding inactive caps, the fixed-rate portion of gross debt was 57.1% and the floating-rate portion was 42.9%.

As of December 31, 2009, the Group has cash and cash equivalents of €5,614.4 million, the majority of which bears interest at floating rates.

Net debt totals €15,127.7 million and is 69.2% fixed-rate and 30.8% floating-rate.

Sensitivity of the consolidated income statement and equity:

The Group manages its exposure to interest rate fluctuations based on floating-rate gross debt net of cash.

The breakdown of the Group’s floating-rate debt by maturity as of December 31, 2009 is as follows:

(€ million)

Overnight and
less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than
5 years

Total

Total assets (cash and cash equivalents)

5,614.4

 

 

5,614.4

Total floating-rate liabilities

(3,438.0)

(855.5)

(477.1)

(4,770.6)

Net floating-rate position before hedging

2,176.4

(855.5)

(477.1)

843.8

Derivative instruments(1)

4.2

(2,159.0)

(3,351.1)

(5,505.9)

Net floating-rate position after active management and hedging

2,180.6

(3,014.5)

(3,828.2)

(4,662.1)


(1) Debt hedging financial instruments excluding inactive caps of U.S.$400 million and €952 million.


The analysis of the sensitivity of finance costs to interest rate risk covers financial assets and liabilities and the derivative portfolio as of December 31, 2009. Given the net debt structure of the Group and its derivative portfolio, a change in interest rates would impact the income statement via the cost of floating-rate debt (after hedging), the fair value of trading derivatives and Group investments.

The analysis of the sensitivity of equity to interest rate risk concerns the cash flow hedge reserve. This sensitivity corresponds to fair market value movements as a result of an instantaneous change in interest rates.

Assuming a constant net debt structure and management policy, an increase in interest rates of 0.5% at the balance sheet date would generate an increase in equity of €25 million (before tax) and a decrease in net income (before tax) of €15 million. A decrease in interest rates of 0.5% would have the opposite impact on net income and equity. All other variables have been assumed to be constant for the purpose of this analysis and the change in net income and equity is attributable to the variation in interest rates, all other things being equal.

29.1.2

Management of foreign exchange risk

The Group’s international activities generate significant foreign currency flows.

The Group’s central treasury department manages foreign exchange risk centrally within limits set by the Chief Finance Officer.

Overall exposure to foreign exchange risk and risk management

Foreign exchange risk, as defined in accordance with IFRS 7, mainly results from:

(a)

foreign currency-denominated purchases and sales of goods and services relating to operating activities and the related hedges (e.g. currency forwards). However, these transactions remain minor within the Group (see Note 29.1.2.1);

(b)

foreign currency-denominated financial assets and liabilities, including foreign currency-denominated loans/borrowings and related hedges (e.g. forex swaps) (see Note 29.1.2.2);

(c)

investments in foreign subsidiaries realized through the translation of accounts impacting the translation reserves (see Note 29.1.2.3).



F-95



Back to Contents


Management of foreign exchange transaction risk:

The Group has no significant exposure to foreign exchange transaction risk. The activities of the Group are performed by subsidiaries operating in their own country and their own currency. Exposure to foreign exchange risk is therefore naturally limited.

Management of foreign exchange asset risk:

Financing is secured in the local currency for operations located in foreign countries. In the case of inter-company financing, these credit lines can generate foreign exchange risk. In order to limit the impact of this risk, Veolia Environnement has developed a policy which seeks to back foreign-currency financing and foreign currency derivatives with inter-company receivables denominated in the same currency.

The asset exposure hedging strategy primarily involves hedging certain net foreign investments and ensuring that Group companies do not have a material balance sheet foreign exchange position that could generate significant volatility in foreign exchange gains and losses (IAS 21 / IAS 39).

29.1.2.1.

Translation risk

Considering its international presence, the translation of the income statements of the Group’s foreign subsidiaries is sensitive to exchange rate fluctuations.

The following table summarizes the sensitivity of certain Group consolidated income statement aggregates to a 10% increase or decrease in foreign exchange rates against the euro, with regard to the translation of financial statements of foreign subsidiaries.

 

Contribution to the consolidated financial statements

Sensitivity to an increase or decrease in the main currencies against the euro

(€ million)

EUR

GBP

USD

PLN

CZK

Other currencies

Total

+10%

-10%

Revenue

20,677.4

2,259.3

2,977.4

502.3

1,150.6

6,984.0

34,551.0

(626.3)

689.0

Operating income

1,046.8

330.4

147.8

46.0

173.3

276.9

2,021.2

(63.4)

69.7


29.1.2.2.

Foreign exchange risk with regard to the net finance cost

With many offices worldwide, Veolia organizes financing in local currencies.

The foreign currency debts borne by the parent company, Veolia Environnement SA, are generally hedged using either derivative instruments or assets in the same currency.

The following table shows the exposure to exchange rate fluctuations of the foreign currency net financial debt of the entities that bear the main foreign exchange risks. It also presents the sensitivity of these entities to a 10% increase or decrease in the parities of the corresponding foreign currencies.

 

Net finance cost
Foreign currency exposure
(in millions of local currency)

 

Sensitivity to an increase or decrease in the 4 main currencies against the euro
(€ million)

 

GBP

USD

PLN

CZK

Other currencies
(in euros)

Total translated into euros

+10%

-10%

Veolia Environnement SA

(37.4)

(86.0)

(54.7)

(313.1)

(356.3)

(473.9)

(15.3)

9.8

Other Group subsidiaries

(21.8)

(96.6)

(51.5)

(13.2)

(199.2)

(310.4)

(11.8)

9.7

Total in foreign currency

(59.2)

(182.7)

(106.2)

(326.3)

(555.5)

(784.3)

  

Total translated into euros

(66.2)

(125.8)

(24.5)

(12.3)

(555.5)

(784.3)

(27.1)

19.5




F-96



Back to Contents


29.1.2.3.

Foreign exchange and translation risk in the consolidated statement of financial position

Due to its international presence, the Group’s consolidated statement of financial position is exposed to exchange rate fluctuations. A fluctuation in the euro impacts the translation of subsidiary foreign currency-denominated assets in the consolidated statement of financial position. The main currencies used are the US dollar and the pound sterling.

For its most significant assets, the Group has issued debt in the relevant currencies.

The following table shows the net asset amounts for the main currencies, defined as the asset amount excluding net financial debt.

 

Contribution to the consolidated financial statements

Sensitivity to an increase or decrease in the 2 main currencies against the euro

(€ million)

EUR

USD

GBP

Other currencies

Total

+10%

-10%

Assets excluding net financial debt by currency

13,044

2,710

2,646

6,859

25,259

595

(487)

Net financial debt by currency

8,506

1,595

1,857

3,170

15,128

384

(314)

Net assets by currency

4,538

1,115

789

3,689

10,131

211

(173)


29.1.3

Management of commodity risk

Fuel or electricity prices can be subject to significant fluctuations. Nonetheless, Veolia Environnement’s activities have not been materially affected and should not be materially affected in the future by cost increases or the availability of fuel or other commodities. The long-term contracts entered into by Veolia Environnement generally include price review and/or indexation clauses which enable it to pass on the majority of any increases in commodity or fuel prices to the price of services sold to customers, even if this may be performed with a time delay.

Nonetheless, as part of supply management and cost optimization, certain Group subsidiaries may be required, depending on their activities, to contract forward purchases or sales of commodities and set-up derivatives to fix the cost of commodities supply, where the contracts do not offer adapted protection.

29.1.3.1.

Fuel risks

In the Transportation Division, a “fuel” hedging policy has been implemented in order to control trends in fuel prices. The Group uses firm fuel purchase contracts (deemed for its own use) or derivatives whose characteristics (notional amount, maturity) are defined in line with forecast fuel requirements (based on firm orders or highly probably forecast flows). The majority of these derivatives are swaps used to determine the forward purchase price of fuel.

These derivatives were analyzed in accordance with IAS 39 and classified as hedging instruments (cash flow hedges) (see Note 28).

29.1.3.2.

Coal, gas and electricity risks

The Group has entered into long-term gas, coal, electricity and biomass purchase contracts in order to secure its supplies.

The majority of these commitments are reciprocal; the third parties concerned are obliged to deliver the quantities indicated in these contracts and the Group is obliged to take them.

These contracts are considered to fall outside the scope of IAS 39, except for specific transactions in Germany, where electricity purchase options and sales commitments have been contracted in parallel. These transactions are not eligible for hedging within the meaning of IAS 39 (see Note 36 on off-balance sheet commitments).



F-97



Back to Contents


29.2

Management of equity risk

As of December 31, 2009, Veolia Environnement held 14,731,592 of its own shares, of which 8,591,656 were allocated to external growth operations and 6,139,936 were acquired for allocation to employees under stock option and employee savings plans, with a market value of €340.7 million, based on a share price of €23.125 and a net carrying amount of €452.6 million deducted from equity.

As part of its cash management strategy, Veolia Environnement holds UCITS shares. These UCITS have the characteristics of monetary UCITS and are not subject to equity risk.

29.3

Management of liquidity risk

The operational management of liquidity and financing is managed by the Treasury and Financing Department. This management involves the centralization of major financing in order to optimize liquidity and cash.

The Group secures financing on international bond markets, international private placement markets, the treasury note market and the bank lending market, (see Note 17 “Non-current and current borrowings”).



F-98



Back to Contents


29.3.1

Maturity of financial liabilities

Undiscounted contractual flows of financial liabilities, comprising principal payments and interest flows, are presented below. Market data used are valid as of December 31, 2009:

 

As of December 31, 2009

Maturing in

(€ million)

Net carrying amount

Total contractual flows(1)

Less than
1 year

2 years

3 to
5 years

More than
5 years

Non-current borrowings

17,647.3

17,422.7

 

773.4

5,468.1

11,181.2

o/w bond issues – publicly offered

12,511.8

12,304.1

 

-

3,735.9

8,568.2

o/w bond issues – private placements

299.1

288.7

  

142.9

145.8

Current borrowings

2,983.1

2,983.1

2,983.1

   

Trade payables

5,311.0

5,311.0

5,311.0

   

Other current operating payables

4,933.4

4,933.4

4,933.4

   

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

454.9

454.9

454.9

   

Interest on non-current and current borrowings(2)

  

851.8

823.0

1,952.9

4,019.3

Derivative instruments – Liabilities

224.1

     

o/w interest rate derivatives

76.6

751.6

57.0

57.2

158.1

479.3

Fair value hedges

8.3

85.5

10.9

10.9

30.0

33.7

Cash flow hedges

59.6

640.8

46.0

42.1

118.8

433.9

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

8.7

25.3

0.1

4.2

9.3

11.7

o/w foreign currency derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

86.8

88.0

68.0

0.1

1.4

18.5

Inflows

 

(2,761.8)

(2,755.3)

(1.1)

(5.4)

0.0

Outflows

 

2,849.8

2,823.3

1.2

6.8

18.5

o/w foreign currency derivatives hedging a net investment

17.1

17.1

1.6

  

15.5

Inflows

 

(276.4)

(272.5)

(3.9)

  

Outflows

 

293.5

274.1

3.9

 

15.5

o/w commodity derivatives

43.6

     

Sub-total debts and liabilities

  

14,660.8

1,653.7

7,580.5

15,713.8

Derivative instruments – Assets

(477.5)

     

o/w interest rate derivatives

(355.0)

(1,173.6)

(180.8)

(180.7)

(458.4)

(353.7)

Fair value hedges

(351.5)

(1163.0)

(178.3)

(178.3)

(453.3)

(353.1)

Cash flow hedges

(0.1)

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

(3.5)

(10.6)

(2.5)

(2.4)

(5.1)

(0.6)

o/w foreign currency derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

(45.5)

(42.8)

(26.5)

(3.4)

(8.9)

(4.0)

Inflows

 

(1,182.4)

(995.4)

(53.3)

(102.9)

(30.8)

Outflows

 

1,139.6

968.9

49.9

94.0

26.8

o/w foreign currency derivatives hedging a net investment

(13.1)

(13.1)

(3.0)

  

(10.1)

Inflows

 

(185.1)

(175.0)

  

(10.1)

Outflows

 

172.0

172.0

   

o/w commodity derivatives

(63.9)

     

Sub-total assets

  

(210.3)

(184.1)

(467.3)

(367.8)

Total

  

14,450.5

1,469.6

7,113.2

15,346.0

(1)

debts are presented at the year-end exchange rate

(2)

floating-rate interest is calculated at the year-end interest rate


The average maturity of financial debt is 10 years.



F-99



Back to Contents


29.3.2

Net liquid asset positions

Net liquid assets of the Group as of December 31, 2009 break down as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31,2008

As of
December 31,2007

Veolia Environnement:

   

Undrawn MT syndicated loans *

3,694.6

2,890.3

4,000.0

Undrawn MT credit lines

400.0

575.0

850.0

Undrawn ST credit lines

575.0

350.0

175.0

Cash & cash equivalents

4,091.2

2,283.6

1,550.8

Subsidiaries:

  

 

Cash & cash equivalents

1,523.2

1,566.0

1,564.8

Total liquid assets

10,284.0

7,664.9

8,140.6

Current debts and bank overdrafts and other cash position items

  

 

Current debts

2,983.1

3,219.7

3,805.0

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

454.9

465.7

459.4

Total current debts and bank overdrafts and other cash position items

3,438.0

3,685.4

4,264.4

Total liquid assets net of current debts and bank overdrafts and cash position items

6,846.0

3,979.5

3,876.2


* maturing April 20, 2012.


As of December 31, 2009, Veolia Environnement had total liquid assets of €10.3 billion, including cash and cash equivalents of €5.6 billion.

As of December 31, 2009, cash equivalents were primarily held by Veolia Environnement SA in the amount of €4,049.8 million including non-dynamic monetary UCITS of €3,037.9 million, negotiable debt instruments (bank certificates of deposit and treasury notes with a maturity of less than three months) of €375.2 million, monetary notes of €385.0 million and term deposits of €250.0 million.

Undrawn credit lines as of December 31, 2009 are as follows:

Bank

Amount in connection with the disposal of US Filter.  For 2004€ million

Maturity

NATIXIS

150

March 31, 2012

BNP Paribas

150

March 2, 2012

HSBC

100

June 30, 2011

RBS formerly ABN

100

December 29, 2010

SG

150

December 23, 2010

ABN Amro

125

December 20, 2010

CIC and 2005 the tax effects also resulted from different US risk assessments. In 2006 as a result of restructuring of US tax Group tax risks reserved under US GAAP were reversed.BFCM


100


Principal presentation differences between IFRS and U.S. GAAP relating to the Group


Use of the Proportionate Consolidation Method

Under IFRS, the Group has decided to retain the proportionate consolidation method, in accordance with IAS 31. This method is used for investments in jointly controlled companies, where the Group and other shareholders have agreed to exercise joint control through a mutual agreement between the partners. Under the proportionate consolidation method, the Group recognizes assets, liabilities, equity, revenues and expenses of subsidiaries to the extent of its interest in the Group ownership.

Under U.S. GAAP, when the Group does not exercise control over a subsidiary, but shares joint control over the entity, the Group uses the equity method to account for its investment. Summarized financial information for those investments accounted for under the proportionate consolidation method is included in note 39.

This difference in accounting policy has no effect on either net income or shareholders’ equity.


Commitments to purchase minority interests

Under IFRS, commitments granted by the Group to shareholders of certain of its fully consolidated subsidiaries to purchase their minority interest are reported, in accordance with IAS 32, as a financial liability at the present value of the purchase consideration. In the absence of guidance provided by IFRS 3 on business combination, the Group records the difference arising on initial recognition of these options, between the carrying amount of the minority interests and the present value of the purchase consideration through goodwill.

Under US GAAP, commitments to purchase minority interests are not recorded as a liability except if their fair market value is negative. In this case, any potential losses are recorded through income and classified as financial liabilities in the statement of financial position under US GAAP

This difference in accounting policy has no effect on either net income or shareholders’ equity but has a presentation effect on short term and long term financial liabilities and goodwill.


Income taxes

Under IFRS, the Group recognizes deferred tax assets on net operating loss carry forward or on temporary differences only when it is probable that the recovery of the related deferred tax asset will be realized.

Under U.S. GAAP, deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and net operating loss carried forward and are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized in a reasonable period of time.

This difference in accounting policy has no effect on either net income or shareholders’ equity but has a presentation effect on gross, net deferred tax assets.


51.2

New accounting standards in the United States effective in 2007 or after

In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155 “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Instruments – an Amendment to FASB Statements No. 133 and 140”. SFAS 155 permits fair value accounting for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that would otherwise require bifurcation in accordance with SFAS 133. Subsequent changes in the fair value of the instrument would be recognised in earnings. Among other things, the statement also establishes a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation. The statement is effective for all financial instruments acquired or issued after September 15, 2006. The Group has no such hybrid instruments, accordingly the adoption of SFAS 155 will not have an impact on its financial instruments.




Back to contents




In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, “Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets – an amendment of SFAS No. 140”. SFAS 156 requires all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities to be initially measured at fair value if practicable and permits an entity to choose between the amortization method or the fair value measurement method for the subsequent measurement of each class of separately recognized servicing assets and liabilities. The Group is currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, that the adoption of SFAS 156 will have on the consolidated financial position or results of operations. SFAS 156 is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006.


In April 2006, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FSP FIN 46(R)-6, “Determining the Variability to Be Considered in Applying FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)”. FSP FIN 46(R)-6 addresses how a reporting enterprise should determine the variability to be considered in applying FIN 46 (R). FSP FIN 46(R)-6 is required to be applied prospectively to all entities with which the Group first becomes involved and to all entities previously required to be analyzed under FIN 46(R) upon the occurrence of certain events, beginning the first day of the first reporting period after June 15, 2006. The Group is currently assessing the impact of adopting FSP FIN 46(R).


On July 2006, the FASB issued FIN No. 48 which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, and should be applied to all tax positions upon initial adoption. FIN No. 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a “more-likely-than-not” recognition threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. Once the recognition threshold has been met, FIN No. 48 requires to recognize the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the taxing authority. The Interpretation also requires making additional disclosures about uncertainties in Company's income tax positions. The Group is currently assessing the impact of adopting this standard.


In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of this standard apply to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, except those related to share based payments or when the accounting pronouncement includes practicability exceptions to fair value measurement. SFAS 157 is effective  for all financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Upon adoption, the provisions of SFAS 157 are to be applied prospectively with limited exceptions. The Group is currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, that the adoption of SFAS 157 will have on the consolidated financial position or results of operations.2010


Calyon

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”. SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure certain financial instruments and certain other items at fair value in order to  mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without applying hedge accounting provisions. SFAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. The Group is currently assessing the impact of adopting this standard.100


March 4, 2010

In September 2006, the FASB issued Staff Position (FSP) AUG AIR-1 “Accounting for Planned Major Maintenance Activities”. The FASB Staff Position eliminates the accrue-in-advance method of accounting for planned major maintenance activities. The Group is currently assessing the impact of adopting the FSP and does not expect it may have a significant impact.Total


975

In June 2006, the FASB ratified the consensus reached under EITF Issue No 06-03 “How Taxes Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities should be presented in the Income Statement (That is Gross versus Net Presentation)”. This consensus does not affect the presentation of the Group’s income statement, in which Revenue are shown net of collected taxes within the scope of the consensus.


51.3

Reconciliation of shareholders' equity and net income to U.S. GAAP

The following is a summary reconciliation of shareholders’ equity as reported in the consolidated balance sheet to shareholders’ equity as adjusted for the effects of the application of U.S. GAAP for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, and net income as reported in the consolidated statement of income to net income as adjusted for the effects of the application of U.S. GAAP for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 (in millions of euros).





Back to contents






 

2006

 

2005

 adjusted

 

2004

adjusted

Shareholders' equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

4,360.8

 

3,790.2

 

3,211.2

Adjustments to conform to U.S. GAAP:

     

Goodwill, net

(979.6)

 

(1,004.3)

 

(1,020.2)

Tangible assets components

(252.0)

 

(200.8)

 

(158.5)

Tangible assets amortization

(3.6)

 

4.4

 

(0.5)

Provision

193.2

 

182.2

 

199.2

Assets retirement obligations

11.8

 

16.1

 

15.2

IFRIC 4 / EITF 1.08 analysis

(109.7)

 

(75.9)

 

(45.8)

IFRIC 12 analysis

(81.9)

 

(44.0)

 

(43.1)

Shares classification (Trading/Available For Sale)

     

Other financial instruments

1.2

 

1.7

 

11.0

Pensions plans and stock options

(37.5)

 

295.8

 

149.7

Others

(37.2)

 

(43.3)

 

(50.9)

Tax effect of above adjustments and income tax reserve

112.1

 

(89.2)

 

(11.8)

U.S. GAAP Shareholders' Equity

3,177.8

 

2,832.9

 

2,255.5

      
 

2006

 

2005

 adjusted

 

2004

adjusted

Net income/(loss) attributable to equity holders of the parent as reported in the consolidated statements of income

758.7

 

622.2

 

389.8

      

Adjustments to conform to U.S. GAAP:

     

Effect of disposal of business on goodwill, net of amortization

19.9

 

30.6

 

30.1

Effect of disposal of business on intangible assets

    

94.6

Cumulative Translation Adjustment included in gain/loss on disposal of business

    

(47.4)

Tangible assets components

(45.1)

 

(38.2)

 

(18.9)

Tangible assets amortization

(1.7)

 

(4.9)

 

(16.8)

Provision

(6.0)

 

5.3

 

3.6

Assets retirement obligations

(3.6)

   

16.6

IFRIC 4 / EITF 1.08 analysis

(21.8)

 

(10.1)

 

6.8

IFRIC 12 analysis

(14.5)

 

(1.0)

 

0.3

Shares classification (Trading/Available For Sale)

    

(21.8)

Other financial instruments

(2.3)

 

(7.5)

 

(21.9)

Pensions plans and stock options

(34.1)

 

6.2

 

7.5

Others

(23.3)

 

3.4

 

(20.0)

Tax effect of above adjustments and income tax reserve

105.9

 

(50.2)

 

(257.3)

U.S. GAAP Net Income attributable to equity holders of the parent

732.1

 

555.7

 

145.2


In 2004 goodwill impairment and effect of disposal on intangible assets relate to the disposition of our interest in USFilter. It generated a positive impact between  US GAAP and IFRS.





Back to contents



Tax effects in reconciliation :


 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

      

Theorical tax (34.43%)

45.6

 

5.6

 

(4.4)

US tax risk

43.0

 

(21.0)

 

(40.5)

Effects of USFilter and FCC disposals (*)

-

 

-

 

(154.8)

Review of tax position of specific assets

  

(29.0)

 

(30.8)

Depreciated deferred tax asset on US GAAP adjustment

20.7

    

Permanent differences

(1.1)

    

Others

(2.3)

 

(5.8)

 

(26.8)

Tax effect of above adjustments

105.9

 

(50.2)

 

(257.3)

 (*) Tax on translation gains in France and no taxation on FCC disposal.


Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share


For U.S. GAAP purposes, basic earnings per share are computed in the same manner as basic earnings per share under IFRS, i.e., by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potential dilution that would occur if all securities and other contracts to issue ordinary shares were exercised or converted. Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent represents the earnings of the Group after minority interests. Income from continuing operations represents Net Income before net income of discontinued operations attributable to equity holders of the parent. The computation of diluted earnings per share is as follows (except earnings per share, in millions of euros or millions of shares):


 

At December 31,

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 
   

adjusted

 

adjusted

 

Net income U.S. GAAP attributable to equity holders of the parent


732.1

 

555.7

 

145.2

 

Net income of discontinued operations

2.7

 

-0.7

 

236.9

 

Income from continuing operations

734.8

 

555.0

 

382.1

 

Weighted average number of shares

      

Outstanding-basic


393.8

 

390.4

 

396.2

 

Dilutive effect of:

      

Shares issuable on exercise of dilutive options


3.8

 

2.0

 

0.1

 

Weighted average number of shares

      

Outstanding-diluted


397.6

 

392.4

 

396.3

 

Earnings per share from Net Income:

      

Basic


1.86

 

1.42

 

0.37

 

Diluted


1.84

 

1.42

 

0.37

 

Earnings per share from Income from Continuing Operations:

      

Basic


1.87

 

1.42

 

0.97

 

Diluted


1.85

 

1.41

 

0.97

 


51.4

Comprehensive income


The concept of comprehensive income does not exist under IFRS. In U.S. GAAP, SFAS 130 “Reporting comprehensive income” and concept statement 6 define comprehensive income. It mainly includes, net of tax impact (in millions of euros):

·

net income,

·

minimum pension liability adjustments (MLA),

·

unrealized gains and losses on investment securities classified as “available for sale” and on derivatives classified as cash flow hedge,

·

foreign currency translation adjustments.




Back to contents




 

Compre-hensive

Income

 

Accumulated foreign translation

 

Accumulated unrealized gains (losses) on equity securities and hedging instruments

 

Minimum liability adjustments

 

Other

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

Adjusted net income 2004 (U.S. GAAP)  

145.2

          

Other comprehensive income 2004, net of tax (U.S. GAAP):


81.6

          

Including :

           

foreign currency translation adjustments

112.5

 

112.5

       

112.5

gain arising during the period on equity securities

5.8

   

5.8

     

5.8

unrealized losses on hedging derivatives

(36.7)

   

(36.7)

     

(36.7)

deferred income taxes

(3.0)

   

(2.1)

 

(0.9)

   

(3.0)

MLA

3.0

     

3.0

   

3.0

Comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2004 (U.S. GAAP)

226.8

 

(617.1)

 

(93.2 )

 

(1.5)

   

(711.8)

Adjusted net income 2005 (U.S. GAAP)

555.7

          

Other comprehensive income 2005, net of tax (U.S. GAAP):


245.3

          

Including :

           

foreign currency translation adjustments

263.8

 

263.8

       

263.8

loss arising during the period on equity securities

(2.0)

   

(2.0)

     

(2.0)

unrealized gain on hedging derivatives

29.6

   

29.6

     

29.6

deferred income taxes

11.3

   

4.6

 

6.7

   

11.3

MLA

(57.4)

     

(57.4)

   

(57.4)

Comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2005 (U.S. GAAP)

801.0

 

(353.3)

 

(61.0)

 

(52.2)

   

(466.5)

Net income 2006 (U.S. GAAP)

732.1

          

Other comprehensive income 2006, net of tax (U.S. GAAP):

(249.8)

          

Including :

           

foreign currency translation adjustments

(96.8)

 

(96.8)

       

(96.8)

loss arising during the period on equity securities

(4.5)

   

(4.5)

     

(4.5)

unrealized gain on hedging derivatives

58.8

   

58.8

     

58.8

deferred income taxes

(12.4)

   

(18.5)

 

6.1

   

(12.4)

MLA

(17.9)

     

(17.9)

   

(17.9)

Adjustment to initially apply SFAS 158, net of tax

      

64.0

 

(241.0)

 

(177.0)

Comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2006 (U.S. GAAP)

659.3

 

(450.1)

 

(25.2)

 

0.0

 

(241.0)

 

(716.3)





Back to contents



51.5

Change in shareholder's equity


The €150 million credit line with BNP Paribas which matured on March 3, 2009 was renewed in the same amount, with a new maturity of March 2, 2012.

The €200 million credit line with Natixis which matured on February 9, 2009 was renewed in the amount of €150 million, with a new maturity of March 31, 2012.

A new credit line of €100 million was negotiated with HSBC, with a maturity of June 30, 2011.

Veolia Environnement may draw on the multi-currency syndicated credit facility and all credit lines at any time.



F-100


January 1, 2004


Back to Contents


29.3.3

Rating

As of December 31, 2009, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s rated Veolia Environnement SA as follows:

2,378 

Short-term

Long-term

Outlook

Recent events

Moody’s

P-2

A3

Negative

On March 26, 2009, Moody’s confirmed the ratings assigned to Veolia Environnement on June 27, 2005, but downgraded the outlook from stable to negative.

Standard and Poor’s

A-2

BBB+

Negative

On March 25, 2009, Standard and Poor’s confirmed the ratings assigned to Veolia Environnement on October 3, 2005, but downgraded the outlook from stable to negative. On January 4, 2010, these ratings were confirmed by Standard and Poor’s.

Net U.S. GAAP income 2004

145 

CTA

113 

Dividend and net income appropriation

(218)

Capital increase

25 

Stock based compensation

Change in treasury shares

(160)

Change in fair value of derivative

(37)

MLA

(3)

Other

13

December 31, 2004 (adjusted)

2,256 

Net U.S. GAAP income 2005

556 

CTA

264 

Dividend and net income appropriation

(265)

Capital increase

47 

Stock based compensation

Change in treasury shares

Change in fair value of derivative

30 

MLA

(57)

Other

(7)

December 31, 2005 (adjusted)

2,832.9

Net U.S. GAAP income 2006

732.1

CTA

(96.8)

Dividend and net income appropriation

(336.3)

Capital increase

181.6

Stock based compensation

38.1

Change in treasury shares

(1.1)

Change in fair value reserve

35.8

MLA

(11.8)

Effect of adopting SFAS 158

(177.0)

Other

(19.7)

December 31, 2006

3,177.8





Back to contents



51.6

Restructuring costs (according to IFRS consolidation scope)

Provisions for restructuring by segment details as follows (in millions of euros):

 

Change in scope of consolidation and other

Additions charged to operating income


Utilization


Reversal

Dec.31,

2004

Change in
scope of consolidation and other

Additions charged to operating Income


Utilization


Reversal

Dec.31,

2005

Change in scope of consolidation and other

Additions charged to operating Income


Utilization


Reversal

Dec.31,

2006

Water

(5.4)

23.2

(19.3)

(3.9)

27.3

2.3

7.2

(19.5)

(0.4)

16.9

10.4

(7.5)

(0.7)

19.1

Other activities

13.3

22.9

(17.9)

(3.5)

27.3

2.3

7.2

(19.5)

(0.4)

16.9

10.4

(7.5)

(0.7)

19.1

Employee termination costs

13.3

22.9

(17.9)

(3.5)

27.3

2.3

7.2

(19.5)

(0.4)

16.9

10.4

(7.5)

(0.7)

19.1

Other restructuring costs

United States Filter Corporation

(8.4)

0.3

(1.4)

(0.4)

Employee termination costs

(1.1)

0.3

(1.4)

Lease termination costs

(4.3)

(0.4)

Other restructuring costs

(3.0)

USFI—Benelux

(5.0)

Employee termination costs

(5.0)

USFI--Other locations

(5.3)

Employee termination costs

(5.3)

Energy

4.7

6.2

(6.7)

(1.4)

11.1

3.9

1.6

(7.3)

(0.2)

9.1

1.1

4.0

(8.5)

(0.5)

5.2

Employee termination costs

4.7

3.6

(4.7)

(0.2)

9.2

2.1

1.2

(5.9)

(0.1)

6.5

(0.4)

4.0

(8.0)

(0.4)

1.7

Other restructuring costs

2.6

(2.0)

(1.2)

1.9

1.8

0.4

(1.4)

(0.1)

2.6

1.5

(0.5)

(0.1)

3.5

Waste Management

(1.3)

6.4

(14.9)

(0.2)

4.6

1.1

1.0

(2.3)

(0.8)

3.6

1.4

4.8

(1.7)

8.1

Employee termination costs

(1.3)

6.4

(5.4)

(0.2)

4.6

(3.3)

(0.8)

(0.5)

1.4

1.4

Other restructuring costs

(9.5)

4.4

1.0

(1.5)

(0.3)

3.6

1.4

3.4

(1.7)

6.7

Transportation

2.0

(1.7)

(0.2)

3.2

1.2

(1.7)

(0.4)

2.3

53.4

3.9

(4.2)

(0.7)

54.7

Employee termination cost

2.0

(0.2)

2.4

1.2

(1.2)

(0.1)

2.3

53.3

3.8

(4.2)

(0.7)

54.5

Other restructuring costs

(1.7)

0.8

(0.5)

(0.3)

0.1

0.1

0.2

                

Total

(2.0)

37.8

(42.6)

(5.7)

46.2

7.3

11.0

(30.8)

(1.8)

31.9

55.9

23.1

(21.9)

(1.9)

87.1




Back to contents




Water

In 2002 and 2003, VWS has launched restructuring plans in the UK, in France (VWSTI) and in the Netherlands (Rossmark). A reserve of €7.5 million was recognized to cover the costs relating to the termination of 118 employees and the closure of 3 sites in France. As of December 31, 2005, these plans were partially completed with the termination of 74 employees and the closure of one site in France. In 2006, 25 additional employees were terminated for a total cost of €2.0 million and an additional provision was recognized for €0.2 million. As of 31 December 2006, the remaining reserve amounted


29.3.4

Information on early debt repayment clauses

Debt of Veolia Environnement SA:

Bank financing:

The legal documentation for syndicated loans (particularly the syndicated loan of €4 billion) and bilateral credit lines contracted by Veolia Environnement SA does not contain any financial covenants, i.e. obligations to comply with a debt payout ratio or interest ratio or a minimum credit rating which, in the event of non-compliance, could lead to the early repayment of the relevant financing.

Bond financing:

The private placement performed in the United States in 2003 (outstanding of €299.1 million as of December 31, 2009) is the only source of bond financing that contains financial covenants (debt hedging ratio < 5.3 and interest hedging ratio > 3.2). These covenants were complied with as of December 31, 2009

The legal documentation for the notes issued by the Company under its EMTN program (outstanding of €11.2 billion as of December 31, 2009) does not contain any financial covenants.

Debt of subsidiaries:

The project financing borne by specific companies or the financing granted by multilateral development banks to the Group’s subsidiaries may contain financial covenants.

As of December 31, 2009, the financing agreements containing such covenants and amounting to more than €100 million (Group share) were as follows:

Financing
(0.4 million compared to €2.2 in December 31, 2005.million)

In the year 2004 VWS has launched two other restructuring plans connected with German acquisitions and with the transfer to VWS of North American operational entities from US Filter. As of December 2004, a reserve of €4.1 million was recognized to cover the restructuring costs. As of 31 December 2005, the plan was totally completed in Germany and all the employees were terminated in North America. As of December 31, 2006, the remaining provision of 0.8 million only concerned charges of  lease contracts in North America.  

In the year 2006, VWS has launched a restructuring plan in the German company Kruger Wabag concerning 20 employees. As of December 31, 2006 VWS recognized a reserve of € 1.9 million.

For Apa Nova Bucuresti, a plan has been presented to and accepted by personnel representatives at the end of 2004 to face a trend of declining volume in water consumption. This plan aims at a reduction of 250 white and blue collars between 2005 and 2006. Accordingly, an additional reserve of €3.1 million has been booked in 2004. In 2005, 148 employees were terminated for a total cost of €1 million. In 2006, 183 additional employees were terminated for a total cost of €2 million. The remaining provision amounted to €0.8 millionOutstanding as of December 31, 2006 compared2009

Type of covenant

Aquiris (Water Division - Belgium)

179.1

DPR1 and deadline for obtaining final acceptance for the plant

Delfluent (Water Division – Netherlands)

112.4

DPR, forecast DPR and duration of financing

Shenzhen (Water Division – China)

100.9

Minimum reserve account

Redal (Water Division - Morocco)

103.6

Working capital, equity/share capital and DPR


DPR (Debt Payout Ratio) = Net financial debt ratio/EBITDA for which the defined aggregates may vary according to €2.6the financing




F-101



Back to Contents


As of December 31, 2009, the Group complied with all the covenants included in the documentation of these significant financing agreements.

With regard to the Aquiris project (Brussels wastewater treatment plant), the lenders waived their right as of January 29, 2010 to demand early repayment of the financing until June 30, 2010. At the same time, a demand guarantee, exercisable as of June 30, 2010 and maturing on August 31, 2010, was granted by Veolia Eau-CGE to the lenders.

Financing for a project with an outstanding of €81 million as of December 31, 2009 contains a covenant that has yet to be complied with.

29.4

Management of credit risk

The Group is exposed to counterparty risk in various areas: its operating activities, cash investment activities and derivatives.

29.4.1

Counterparty risk relating to operating activities

Credit risk must be considered separately with respect to operating financial assets and operating receivables. Credit risk on operating financial assets is appraised via the rating of primarily public customers. Credit risk on other operating receivables is appraised through an analysis of risk dilution and late payments for private customers and exceptionally, for public customers, by a credit analysis.

Group customer credit risk analysis may be broken down into the following four categories (Public customers - Delegating authority, Private customers - Individuals, Public customers - Other and Private customers - Companies):

  

As of December 31, 2009

Breakdown by customer type

(€ million)

Note

Gross
carrying
amount

Provisions

Net carrying
amount

Public
customers -
Delegating
authority

Private
customers -
Individuals

Public
customers -
Other

Private
customers -
Companies

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,705.0

(53.2)

5,651.8

4,647.3

 

185.6

818.9

Trade receivables

13

9,641.6

(560.3)

9,081.3

2,202.8

1,685.8

1,672.9

3,519.8

Other current operating receivables

13

1,178.0

(76.8)

1,101.2

183.3

318.6

88.3

511.0

Other non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

774.8

(73.5)

701.3

59.0

4.1

19.3

618.9(1)

Current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

195.8

(31.9)

163.9

27.9

5.1

3.8

127.1

Loans and receivables

 

17,495.2

(795.7)

16,699.5

7,120.3

2,013.6

1,969.9

5,595.7

Other non-current financial assets

11

72.8

(20.2)

52.6

3.1

7.1

18.2

24.2

Other current financial assets

11

57.9

(4.1)

53.8

1.9

4.1

0.3

47.5

Total

 

17,625.9

(820.0)

16,805.9

7,125.3

2,024.8

1,988.4

5,667.4



1

Of which Dalkia International and its subsidiaries in the amount of €434.2 million as of December 31, 2008 and €390.8 million as of December 31, 2009.



F-102



Back to Contents


The analysis of Group customer credit risk as of December 31, 2008 is as follows:

  

As of December 31, 2008

Breakdown by customer type

(€ million)

Note

Gross
carrying
amount

Provisions

Net carrying
amount

Public
customers -
Delegating
authority

Private
customers -
Individuals

Public
customers -
Other

Private
customers -
Companies

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,763.8 

(12.6)

5,751.2 

4,834.9

-

54.0

862.3

Trade receivables

13

10,253.0 

(550.9)

9,702.1 

2,228.2

1,877.2

1,776.1

3,820.6

Other current operating receivables

13

1,314.1 

(59.6)

1,254.5 

244.3

312.9

153.1

544.2

Other non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

803.0 

(63.4) 

739.6 

59.9

21.8

28.9

629.0(1)

Current financial assets in loans and receivables

14

283.3 

(27.9) 

255.4 

29.4

4.7

28.6

192.7

Loans and receivables

 

18,417.2 

(714.4) 

17,702.8 

7,396.7

2,216.6

2,040.7

6,048.8

Other non-current financial assets

11

91.5 

(13.8) 

77.7 

23.3

8.1

17.6

28.7

Other current financial assets

14

70.2 

(4.2) 

66.0 

2.0

3.9

26.0

34.1


Given the nature of the Group’s activities and its customers, and notably the ongoing nature of its activities, the Group considers that credit risk is unlikely to have a material impact.



1

Of which Dalkia International and its subsidiaries in the amount of €434.2 million as of December 31, 2008 and €390.8 million as of December 31, 2009.



F-103



Back to Contents


Assets past due and not impaired break down as follows:

  

As of December 31, 2009

Assets past due but not impaired

  

Gross
carrying
amount

Provisions

Net carrying
amount

Assets not
yet due

(€ million)

Note

0-6
months

6 months -
1 year

More
than
1 year

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,705.0

(53.2)

5,651.8

5,623.7

13.7

7.4

7.0

Trade receivables

13

9,941.6

(560.3)

9,081.3

6,765.4

1,631.7

267.3

416.9

Other current operating receivables

13

1,178.0

(76.8)

1,101.2

747.2

87.3

171.3

95.4

Other non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

774.8

(73.5)

701.3

701.3

   

Current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

195.8

(31.9)

163.9

136.4

10.8

5.6

11.1

Loans and receivables

 

17,495.2

(795.7)

16,699.5

13,974.0

1,743.5

451.6

530.4

Other non-current financial assets

11

72.8

(20.2)

52.6

52.6

   

Other current financial assets

11

57.9

(4.1)

53.8

48.2

 

1.9

3.7


Assets past due over 6 months and not impaired (€987.6 million) mainly consist of trade receivables. They declined by 11.2% compared to fiscal 2008.

Payment delays in excess of 6 months are mainly concentrated in two countries where settlement periods are exceptionally long:

In Italy, the net “trade receivables” account for all Group subsidiaries is €247.2 million as of December 31, 2009, for receivables past due over 6 months. This period is due to settlement practices in this country. Furthermore, in Italy, trade receivables primarily consist of a multitude of user/private customers for which the credit risk is highly diluted and local authorities and state bodies for which the recovery period is long.

In Morocco, the net “trade receivables” account is €39.6 million as of December 31, 2009, compared to €73.3 million as of December 31, 2008, for receivables past due over 6 months. This decrease was mainly attributable to the change in consolidated method (from full to proportionate consolidation) for the Water division’s activity in North Africa and the Middle East.

Finally, in France, net trade receivables past due over 6 months total €196.7 million at the end of 2009 (€262.1 million at the end of 2008) representing 4.2% of customer outstandings (including €109.8 million past due over one year), the majority of which concern amounts invoiced on behalf of local authorities and public bodies, receivables on local authorities and public bodies and VAT.



F-104



Back to Contents


Financial assets maturity schedule as of December 31, 2008.

  

As of December 31,2008

Assets past due but not impaired

  

Gross carrying amount

Provisions

Net carrying amount

Assets not yet due

(€ million)

Note

0-6 months

6 months - 1 year

More than 1 year

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,763.8 

(12.6) 

5,751.2 

5,738.4

7.2

5.6

-

Trade receivables

13

10,253.0 

(550.9) 

9,702.1 

6,649.7

2,258.2

387.4

406.8

Other current operating receivables

13

1,314.1 

(59.6) 

1,254.5 

819.5

162.5

162.1

110.4

Other non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

803.0 

(63.4)

739.6 

739.6

 -

 -

 -

Current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

283.3 

(27.9) 

255.4 

188.6

45.2

12.3

9.3

Loans and receivables

 

18,417.2 

(714.4) 

17,702.8 

14,135.8

2,473.1

567.4

526.5

Other non-current financial assets

11

91.5 

(13.8) 

77.7 

77.7

 -

 -

 -

Other current financial assets

11

70.2 

(4.2) 

66.0 

17.7

30.5

3.9

13.9


Financial assets maturity schedule as of December 31, 2007:

  

As of December 31, 2007

Assets past due but not impaired

  

Gross carrying amount

Provisions

Net carrying amount

Assets not yet due

(€ million)

Note

0-6 months

6 months - 1 year

More than 1 year

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,633.6

(6.0)

5,627.6

5,624.4

2.5

0.7

-

Trade receivables

13

9,813.7

(510.0)

9,303.7

6,335.5

2,305.0

309.7

353.5

Other current operating receivables

13

1,508.1

(75.1)

1,433.0

784.0

451.5

134.1

63.4

Other non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

572.6

(57.6)

515.0

515.0

-

-

-

Current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

174.1

(21.3)

152.8

123.3

15.7

6.2

7.6

Loans and receivables

 

17,702.1

(670.0)

17,032.1

13,382.2

2,774.7

450.7

424.5

Other non-current financial assets

11

231.0

-

231.0

231.0

-

-

-

Other current financial assets

11

177.2

-

177.2

177.2

-

-

-


29.4.2

Counterparty risk relating to investment and hedging activities

The Group is exposed to credit risk relating to the investment of its surplus cash and its use of derivative instruments in order to manage interest rate and currency risk. Credit risk corresponds to the loss that the Group may incur should a counterparty default on its contractual obligations. In the case of derivative financial instruments, this risk corresponds to the fair value of all the instruments contracted with a counterparty insofar as this value is positive.

The Group minimizes counterparty risk through internal control procedures limiting the choice of counterparties to leading banks and financial institutions (banks and financial institutions with a minimum Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s or Fitch’s rating of A1/P1/F1 respectively for transactions with a term of less than one year and of A2/A/A respectively for transactions with a term of more than one year). Limits are determined for each counterparty based primarily on the rating awarded by the rating agencies and the size of their equity, and are reviewed monthly. In addition, derivative transactions are only entered into with counterparties with whom the Group has an ISDA or FBF framework agreement.



F-105



Back to Contents


Deposit counterparty risk is managed by the Treasury and Financing Department which centralizes the cash positions of Group entities. In this way, the counterparty risk of entities is limited to settlement and account keeping banking activities, signature commitments and the continuation of credit lines obtained from banks with the authorization of the Group Treasury and Financing Department.

Counterparty risk on financial transactions is monitored on an ongoing basis by the middle-office. The Group is not exposed to any risk as a result of material concentration.

As of December 31, 2009, Veolia Environnement SA’s total outstandings exposed to credit risk amounted to €4,049.8 million with regard to investments and €272 million with regard to derivative instruments (sum of the fair values of assets and liabilities). These counterparties are investment grade for up to 97% of the total exposure.

Veolia Environnement SA cash surpluses (€4.05 billion as of December 31, 2009) are managed with a profitability objective close to that of the money market and avoiding exposure to capital risk and maintaining a low level of volatility.

They were injected into the following types of investment:

non-dynamic monetary UCITS (with the AMF Euro Monetary classification) for €3,038 million,

certificates of deposit and term deposits with a maturity of less than three months with leading French banks with a rating from Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s or Fitch: A1+/P1/F1 in the short term for €350 million,

negotiable debt securities with a maturity of less than three months issued by CAC40 or Eurostoxx 50 companies for €275 million,

monetary notes issued by leading French banks with a rating from Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s or Fitch: A1+/P1/F1 in the short term for €385 million.

NOTE 30

Employee benefit obligation

Share-based compensation

Veolia Environnement share purchase and subscription option plans

Veolia Environnement has implemented several standard fixed share purchase and subscription option plans, as well as a variable plan for management.

Outstanding option plans at the end of 2009 were as follows:

 

N°7

N°6

N°5

N°4

N°3

N°2

 

2007

2006

2004

2003

2002

2001

Grant date

07/17/2007

03/28/2006

12/24/2004

03/24/2003

01/28/2002

02/08/2001

Number of options granted

2,490,400

4,044,900

3,341,600

5,192,635

4,413,000

3,462,000

Number of options not exercised

635,850 (*)

3,709,861

3,080,738

1,571,010

1,929,114

0

Plan term

8 years

8 years

8 years

8 years

8 years

8 years

Vesting conditions

4 years service plus performance conditions to be satisfied

4 years service

3 years service plus performance conditions for certain plans

3 years service

3 years service

3 years service

Vesting method

After 4 years

After 4 years

By tranches of 1/3 over 3 years

By tranches of 1/3 over 3 years

By tranches of 1/3 over 3 years

After 3 years

Strike price
(in euros)

57.05

44.03**

24.32**

22.14**

36.65**

40.59**


*

Given the performance criteria, the number of options effectively exercisable has been reduced from 1,742,650 in 2008.

**

Strike price adjusted to take account of transactions impacting the share capital of the Company (issue of share subscription warrants on December 17, 2001 and share capital increases with retention of preferential subscription rights on August 2, 2002 and July 10, 2008). To recap, the initial strike prices for plans no. 2, no. 3, no. 4, no. 5 and no. 6 were €42.00, €37.53, €22.50, €24.72 and €44.75 respectively.



F-106



Back to Contents


2008 and 2009:

The Group did not grant any share options in 2008 or 2009.

2007:

In 2007, the Group granted 2,490,400 share options to two employee groups. The first group comprises Veolia Environnement Group management, including members of the Executive Committee. The second group comprises senior managers of Veolia Environnement Group companies and employees recognized for their excellent performance in 2006. The estimated fair value of each option granted in 2007 was €13,91. This value was calculated using the Black and Scholes model based on the following underlying assumptions: share price of €57.26, historical volatility of 21.75%, expected dividend yield of 2%, risk-free interest rate of 4.59%, estimated exercise maturity of 6 years.

In 2007, the Group granted 333,700 Free Shares to employees recognized for their excellent performance in 2006. In France, rights vest after two years, followed by a two year lock-in period and are subject to performance conditions. Outside France, rights vest after four years subject to performance conditions. The estimated fair value of each free share granted in 2007 was €57.26, net of dividends not received during the vesting period and, for shares granted to French employees, a discount for non-transferability.

Finally, in 2007, the Group granted 205,200 Stock Appreciation Rights (SAR) to ordinary shares to three groups of employees: firstly, Veolia Environnement Group management, secondly senior managers of Veolia Environnement Group companies and thirdly employees recognized for their excellent performance in 2006. Rights vest after four years subject to performance conditions. As of December 31, 2009, the estimated fair value of each option granted in 2007 is €0.195. This value was calculated using the Black and Scholes model based on the following underlying assumptions: share price of €22.52, historical volatility of 33.24%, expected dividend yield of 5.35%, risk-free interest rate of 1.99%, estimated exercise maturity of 3 years, subscription price of €57.20.

The number of options granted under the three 2007 plans (share options, free shares and SAR) was determined based on the increase in net earnings per share between December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2008. This has been taken into account in the calculation of the number of options vested and the compensation expense.

2006:

In 2006, the Group granted 4,044,900 share options to three employee groups. The first group comprises Veolia Environnement Group management, including members of the Executive Committee. The second group comprises senior management of Veolia Environnement Group companies. The third group comprises Group employees recognized for their excellent performance. The estimated fair value of each option granted in 2006 was €10.01. This value was calculated using the Black and Scholes model based on the following underlying assumptions: share price of €44.75, historical volatility of 22.6%, expected dividend yield of 1.92%, risk-free interest rate of 3.69%, estimated exercise maturity of 6 years.

Information on share purchase and subscription options granted since 2001 is detailed below, with a breakdown of movements in 2007, 2008 and 2009 (share option plans excluding SAR plans and free share plans):

 

Number of shares outstanding

 

Weighted average strike price (in € )

As of December 31, 2006

16,800,258

 

33.67

Granted

2,490,400

 

57.05

Adjustment for share capital increase of July 10, 2007

228,525

 

33.79

Exercised

(4,046,076)

 

30.20

Cancelled

(51,934)

 

49.70

Expired

-

 

-

As of December 31, 2007

15,421,173

 

37.71

Granted

-

 

-

Exercised

(886,095)

 

28.36

Cancelled

(242,056)

 

46.78

Expired

(1,804,495)*

 

56.17

As of December 31, 2008

12,488,527

 

35.53

Granted

   

Exercised

(31,011)

 

25.06

Cancelled

(148,418)

 

46.05

Expired

(1,382,525)

 

40.59

As of December 31, 2009

10,926,573

 

34.78

* including 1,742,650 shares due to failure to meet performance conditions




F-107



Back to Contents


The average share price at the time of option exercise in 2009 was €24.21.

Details of Veolia Environnement share purchase and subscription options outstanding as of December 31, 2009 are as follows:

Strike price

Number of options outstanding

 

Average strike price

(in euros)

 

Average residual term

(in years)

 

Number of options vested

20-25

4,651,748

 

23.58

 

2.39

 

4,651,748

35-40

1,929,114

 

36.65

 

0.08

 

1,929,114

40-45

3,709,861

 

44.03

 

4.24

 

0

55-60

635,850

 

57.05

 

5.54

 

0

 

10,926,573

 

34.78

 

3.40

 

6,580,862


As of December 31, 2009, 6,580,862 can be exercised.

Employees’ savings plans

Veolia Environnement has set-up standard and leveraged savings plans which enable a large number of employees of Veolia Environnement and its subsidiaries to subscribe for Veolia Environnement shares. Shares subscribed by employees under these plans are subject to certain restrictions regarding their sale or transfer by employees.

Veolia Environnement did not introduce any new employee savings plans in 2008.

Shares subscribed by Veolia Environnement employees in 2007 and 2009:


 

2009

2007

Number of shares

624,387

1,415,163

Subscription price

€21.28

€48.37 (*)

Amount subscribed (€ million)

13.3

68.5


(*)

 weighted average price - 1,392,857 shares were subscribed at €48.18 and 22,306 were subscribed at €60.23 (leveraged formula with the grant of share subscription warrants in Germany and leveraged formula with the grant of SAR in Australia, Canada, South Korea, Portugal and Sweden).


In 2009, in the absence of a discount for plan subscribers, the expense recognized for the savings plan totaled €5.1 million and corresponds to the contribution valued as of July 3, the transaction closing date, less a non-transferability discount for the standard plan of €915,000.

In 2007, a compensation expense of €49.7 million was recorded in accordance with IFRS 2 on share-based payments. This compensation includes a discount for non-transferability of €7.2 million.

Veolia Group applies the recommendations of the CNC (communiqué of December 21, 2004 on Group Savings Plans and supplementary notice of February 2, 2007). The discount for non-transferability was determined by calculating the difference between the value of a five-year forward sale of shares and the spot purchase of the same number of shares, financed by a loan. The risk-free interest rate and the interest rate for calculating the carrying cost were 4.05% and 6.74% in 2007 and 2.76% and 6.90% in 2009. The notional cost of non-transferability of shares as a percentage of the spot rate of the shares at the grant date was 12% in 2007 and 17.9% in 2009.



F-108



Back to Contents


Pension plans and other post-employment benefits

a - Description of plans

In accordance with the regulatory environment and collective agreements, the Group has established defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans (company or multi-employer) in favor of employees and other post-employment benefits.

In certain subsidiaries, supplementary defined contribution plans were set up. Expenses incurred by the Group under these plans total €91 million for 2009 and €89 million for 2008.

Certain Group companies have established defined benefit pension plans and/or offer other post-employment benefits (mainly retirement termination payments). The largest defined benefit pension plans are located in the United Kingdom, with a pension obligation as of December 31, 2009 of €988 million (and plan assets of €857 million) and in France with a pension obligation as of December 31, 2009 of €478 million (and plan assets of €127 million), notably in respect of retirement termination payments.

Under collective agreements, certain Group companies participate in multi-employer defined benefit pension plans. However, as these plans are unable to provide a consistent and reliable basis for the allocation of the obligation, assets and costs between the different participating entities, they are recorded as defined contribution plans in accordance with IAS 19. The main multi-employer plans are located in Sweden, Germany and the Netherlands and concern approximately 11,500 employees. The corresponding expense recorded in the consolidated income statement is equal to annual contributions and totals slightly over €29 million in 2009 compared to €32 million in 2008. Multi-employer plans in Sweden and the Netherlands are funded by capitalization; German multi-employer plans are funded by redistribution.

The Group also offers post-employment benefits and notably health insurance plans in the United States and France.

b-

Obligations in respect of defined benefit pension plans and other post-employment benefits

The following schedules present obligations in respect of defined benefit pension plans and other post-employment benefits

NB: these schedules exclude, by definition, defined contribution pension plans (as the obligation is limited to the annual contribution expensed in the year and the plans do not, therefore, result in the recording of a provision based on actuarial valuations) and multi-employer defined benefit pension plans which are accounted for as defined contribution pension plans.



F-109



Back to Contents


b-1 Change in the defined benefit obligation (D.B.O)

 

As of December 31,

(€ million)

Pension plans and other post-employment benefits

(excluding health insurance coverage of retirees)

Health insurance coverage
of retirees

Change in the defined benefit obligation

2009

2008

2007

2009

2008

2007

Defined benefit obligation at beginning of year

1,522.0

1,733.4

1,836.0

41.7

41.0

53.8

Current service cost

51.3

53.4

61.8

0.6

1.4

1.6

Interest cost

89.4

88.7

85.7

2.4

2.2

2.3

Plan participants’ contributions

5.7

7.1

7.9

-

-

-

Benefit obligation assumed on acquisition of subsidiaries

5.1

7.3

41.3

-

-

-

Benefit obligation transferred on disposal of subsidiaries

(14.3)

(20.4)

(2.3)

-

-

-

Curtailments

Liquidations

(9.3)

(1.1)

(5.0)

(23.2)

(3.3)

(9.6)

-

(2.6)

-

-

(8.3)

-

Actuarial loss (gain)

142.6

(75.2)

(128.5)

1.3

(3.7)

(5.9)

Benefits paid

(78.8)

(79.2)

(75.6)

(2.8)

(3.1)

(2.6)

Plan amendments

3.3

43.0

21.1

-

-

-

Other (incl. changes in consolidation scope and foreign exchange translation)

54.2

(207.9)

(101.1)

0.9

3.9

0.1

(1) Defined benefit obligation at end of year

1,770.1

1,522.0

1,733.4

41.5

41.7

41.0

Other changes in the defined benefit obligation for pension plans and other post-employment benefits (excluding medical insurance coverage of retirees) primarily concern the impact of foreign exchange translation (€60 million in 2009).

b-2 Change in plan assets

 

As of December 31,

(€ million)

Pension plans and other post-employment benefits

(excluding health insurance coverage of retirees)

Health insurance coverage of retirees

Change in plan assets

2009

2008

2007

2009

2008

2007

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

901.1

1,242.7

1,220.8

-

-

-

Expected return on plan assets

58.6

72.8

70.9

-

-

-

Actuarial gains (losses)

79.2

(219.6)

(5.6)

-

-

-

Group contributions

63.4

45.2

74.9

-

-

-

Plan participants’ contributions

5.7

7.1

7.9

-

-

-

Plan assets acquired on acquisition of subsidiaries

4.1

1.8

24.8

-

-

-

Plan assets transferred on disposal of subsidiaries

(2.4)

(1.6)

(0.5)

-

-

-

Liquidations

(0.9)

(12.2)

(9.9)

-

-

-

Benefits paid

(50.5)

(49.0)

(47.8)

-

-

-

Other (incl. changes in consolidation scope and foreign exchange translation)

43.6

(185.9)

(92.8)

-

-

-

(2) Fair value of plan assets at end of year

1,101.9

901.1

1,242.7

-

-

-




F-110



Back to Contents


Other changes in plan assets primarily concern the impact of foreign exchange translation (€51 million in 2009).

Group pension plan assets were invested as follows as of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007:

 

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31,2007

Shares

46%

46%

50%

Bonds and debt instruments

41%

40%

38%

Insurance risk-free funds

13%

12%

8%

Liquid assets

0%

0%

3%

Other

0%

2%

1%


Group assets in France are primarily invested with insurance companies and the expected long-term return on these assets is directly linked to past rates of return. Assets in the United Kingdom are primarily invested in shares and bonds via a trust and expected long-term rates of return are based on long-term market performance statistics.

The actual return on plan assets (expected return on plan assets + actuarial gains/losses) was €137.8 million at the end of 2009, compared to -€146.8 million at the end of December 2008 and €65.3 million at the end of December 2007.

The expected return on plan assets in 2010 is €64 million.

Group contributions in 2009 include exceptional contributions of €7 million in the United Kingdom.

The Group plans to make contributions of €46 million to defined benefit plans in 2010.

b-3 Change in funding status and the provision

 

As of December 31

 

Pension plans and other post-employment benefits

(excluding health insurance coverage of retirees)

Health insurance coverage of retirees

(€ million)

2009

2008

2007

2009

2008

2007

Funding status = (2) – (1)

(668.2)

(620.9)

(490.7)

(41.5)

(41.7)

(41.0)

Unrecognized past service costs

88.4

96.6

61.2

0.6

-

-

Other

0

(2.1)

(6.4)

 

-

-

Net obligation

(579.8)

(526.4)

(435.9)

(40.8)

(41.7)

(41.0)

Provisions

(594.2)

(539.8)

(445.3)

(40.8)

(41.7)

(41.0)

Prepaid benefits

14.4

13.6

9.4

0

-

-




F-111



Back to Contents


Provisions for post-employment benefits total €635.0 million, compared to €581.5 million in 2008. In 2009, this amount notably includes provisions of €7.2 million reclassified in the consolidated statement of financial position in Liabilities directly associated with assets held for sale (i.e. an amount of €627.8 million recorded in the consolidated statement of financial position).

The defined benefit obligation (DBO) is €347 million for unfunded defined benefit pension plans and other post-employment benefits (excluding medical insurance coverage of retirees) and €1,423 million for partially or fully funded plans as of December 31, 2009, compared to €341 million and €1,181 million at the end of 2008 and €334 million and €1,441 million at the end of 2007.

b-4 Change in repayment entitlement

(€ million)

Change in repayment entitlement

2009

2008

2007

Fair value of repayment entitlement at beginning of year

22.3

21.5

25.9

Expected return on repayment entitlement

0.9

0.9

1.1

Actuarial gains (losses)

0.9

(1.0)

(3.3)

Repayment entitlement acquired on acquisition of subsidiaries

-

-

-

Repayments

(1.9)

(1.6)

(2.2)

Other (including new repayment entitlements)

0.2

2.5

-

Fair value of repayment entitlement at end of year

22.4

22.3

21.5


The market value of repayment entitlement recorded in assets as of December 31, 2009 is €22.4 million. Repayment entitlement concerns the portion of employee rights to post-employment benefits (including medical insurance coverage of retirees) corresponding to periods during which the employee was employed by a previous employer or where the operating contract stipulates that employee entitlement to post-employment benefits is assumed by a third party.'

b-5 Impact on the consolidated income statement

The net benefit cost for the period is as follows:

 

As of December 31

 

Pension plans and other post-employment benefits

(excluding health insurance coverage of retirees)

Health insurance coverage of retirees

(€ million)

2009

2008

2007

2009

2008

2007

Current service cost

51.3

53.4

61.8

0.6

1.4

1.6

Interest cost

89.4

88.7

85.7

2.4

2.2

2.3

Expected return on plan assets

(58.6)

(72.8)

(70.9)

-

-

-

Expected return on repayment entitlement

-

-

(1.1)

(0.9)

(0.9)

-

Past service costs recognized in the year

10.2

9.4

7.6

0.4

-

0.1

Curtailments / liquidations

(9.5)

(16.3)

(3.1)

(2.6)

-

-

Other(1)

(12.3)

(1.2)

(0.3)

-

2.2

-

Net benefit cost(2)

70.5

61.2

79.7

(0.1)

4.9

4.0


(1)

In 2009, the “Other” heading primarily includes provision charges and reversals for labor commitments involving contract gains and losses.

(2)

The 2008 cost excludes the Clemessy and Crystal entities, divested in December 2008.


These costs were recorded in full in operating income, except for interest costs and the expected return on plan assets which are recorded in net finance costs.



F-112



Back to Contents


c - Actuarial assumptions

Actuarial assumptions used for calculation purposes vary depending on the country in which the plan is implemented.

Pension plans and other post-employment benefits (excluding medical insurance coverage of retirees)

The benefit obligation in respect of pension plans as of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 is based on the following average assumptions:

 

As of
December 31,
2009

As of
December 31,
2008

As of
December 31,
2007

Discount rate

5.23%

5.83%

5.49%

Expected rate of salary increase

3.66%

3.8%

3.5%

As of December 31, 2009, the discount rates in the main areas with regard to post-employment commitments are as follows:

As of
December 31, 2005.

In 2003, Berliner Wasserbetriebe (BWB), a joint venture held at 50% and accounted for under the proportional method, implemented a restructuring plan for adaptation to future market demands, by optimizing processes and realigning the organization. Restructuring reserves are booked on an annual basis, according to number of people accepting to enter the plan that is spread over several years. The potential number of employees concerned is 970. As of 31 December 2005, the plan concerned 400 employees and a reserve of € 17.2 million (at 100%) was recognized to cover the termination costs. During the year 2006, 176 new employees decided to join the plan representing an additional reserve of € 14.7 million (at 100%) and employee termination costs of € 5.9 million (at 100%) were used. As of 31 December 2006, the plan concerned 576 employees and the related reserve amounted to € 26.1 million.


Energy

In 2003, Dalkia International implemented restructuring plans to integrate recent acquisitions including DBU in the Netherlands, Pec Poznan in Poland and Giglio in Italy. These restructuring plans amount to a total of €5.8 million in termination costs for 215 employees of whom 26 are professional, other restructuring costs amount to €2.5 million, mainly utilized in 2004.

In 2004, further to the acquisition of a power plant in Poznan in Poland, Dalkia International implemented a restructuring plan for €4.7 million recognized in column "change in scope", of which €3.0 million have been utilized in 2005. This plan consists in termination costs for 210 employees.  This plan was achieved in 2006 and provisions fully used.  Additional restructuring plans were launched in DBU (Netherlands) for €3.1 million covering miscellaneous costs, the reserve utilized in 2005 amounted to 1.4 million.  The plan was mainly utilized in 2006.

In 2005, during the acquisition of a plant in Lodz in Poland, Dalkia International implemented a restructuring plan for €2.5 million recognized in column "change in scope". This plan consists in termination costs for 150 employees. Dalkia BV and Dalkia PLC recognize additional provision for, respectively,  €0.8 million and €0.3 million.

In 2006, the remaining minor plans relate to Czech activities for €2.0 million and Swiss activities managed with Waste activities for €1.2 million.


Waste management

Onyx as part of a program to reduce its overhead costs has implemented a reorganization of its IT services. The reserve amounted to €6.5 million as of January 1, 2004 and has been fully utilized over the course of 2004.

At the end of 2003, Onyx decided to change its north american management, which led to a reserve of €5.2 million for employee termination costs. This reserve was fully used in 2004.

Reserve as at December 31, 2005 is relative to minor restructuring plans. The major of them amounts to €1.5 million for a plant of Valnor in France, covering contract termination costs.

In 2006, three minor plans were implemented.  The first relate to the exit costs of facilities in Germany for €1.5 million, the second to Cleanaway for €2.1 million in the context of exit costs of the headquarters for 90 employees and the third in the Swiss activities managemed with Energy division for €1.6 million.




2009


Back to contents

United Kingdom

5.5%

Euro zone

5.25%


The expected returns on plan assets in 2009, 2008 and 2007, as defined at the start of each year to determine the amount recorded in the income statement, are as follows:

 

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31,
2008

As of
December 31,
2007

Expected return on plan assets

6.5%

6.4%

6.0%

Average residual active life expectancy (in years)

13.0

12.0

12.0


In the United Kingdom, where the vast majority of plan assets are located, the expected return, as defined at the start of 2009, was 7%.

The actual return on plans assets in 2009, 2008 and 2007 was 13.8%, -13.7% and 5.3% respectively.

The Group benefit obligation is especially sensitive to the discount rate and inflation. A 1% increase in the discount rate would decrease the benefit obligation by €237 million and current service costs by €10 million. A 1% decrease in the discount rate would increase the benefit obligation by €284 million and current service costs by €13 million.

Conversely, a 1% increase in the inflation rate would increase the benefit obligation by €231 million and current service costs by €9 million. A 1% decrease in the inflation rate would decrease the benefit obligation by €201 million and current service costs by €7 million.

A 1% increase in the expected rate of return assumption would generate additional income of €7.8 million.

Medical insurance coverage of retirees

Additional assumptions concerning health insurance plans are as follows:

Average rate of increase in health insurance costs

As of
December 31,
2009

As of
December 31,
2008

As of
December 31,
2007

Assumed rate of increase in health costs in the coming year

4.9%

5.1%

5.4%

Target rate of increase in costs

3.5%

3.6%

3.5%

Year long-term rate is expected to stabilize

2019

2020

2020

Assumptions concerning the growth in health insurance costs impact the post-employment benefit obligation as follows: a 1% increase in the assumed rate of increase in health costs would increase the post-employment benefit obligation by €6.9 million and, conversely, a 1% decrease would reduce the post-employment benefit obligation by €5.3 million.

Assumptions concerning the rate of increase in health insurance costs have a minimal impact on the current service cost.



F-113



Back to Contents



Amounts for the current and four prior periods are as follows:

Retirement plans and other post-employment benefits(excluding medical insurance coverage of retirees)

2009

2008

2007

2006

Benefit obligation at year end

(1,770.1)

(1,522.0)

(1,733.4)

(1,836.0)

Fair value of plan assets at year end

1,101.9

901.1

1,242.7

1,220.8

Funded status

(668.2)

(620.9)

(490.7)

(615.2)

Actuarial gains (losses) / experience adjustments on obligations

(11.7)

8.8

(0.7)

3.4

% of the benefit obligation

0.66%

-0.58%

0.04%

-0.19%

Actuarial gains (losses) / experience adjustments on plan assets

79.2

(219.6)

(5.6)

21.5


Medical insurance coverage of retirees

2009

2008

2007

2006

Benefit obligation at year end

(41.5)

(41.7)

(41.0)

(53.8)

Fair value of plan assets at year end

 

-

-

-

Funded status

(41.5)

(41.7)

(41.0)

(53.8)

Actuarial gains (losses) / experience adjustments on obligations

0.5

1.9

1.9

-0.7

% of the benefit obligation

-1.20%

-4.56%

-4.63%

1.30%

Actuarial gains (losses) / experience adjustments on plan assets

-

-

-

-


The cumulative amounts ofactuarial gains and losses on obligations and assets recognized in other comprehensive income and the change in the asset ceiling are as follows:

 

2009

2008

2007

Cumulative amount as of January 1

(185.8)

(48.3)

(172.7)

Change during the period

(61.7)

(137.5)

124.4

Cumulative amount as of December 31

(247.5)

(185.8)

(48.3)


NOTE 31

Main acquisitions

31.1

Acquisitions in 2009

Acquisitions in 2009 with related net cash flows of less than €100 million represent business combination costs of €195 million. These acquisitions contributed €110 million to Group revenue in 2009.

In general, goodwill balances are justified by synergies with existing operations in the Group and future developments.

31.2

Acquisitions in 2008

Acquired asset and liability fair values recorded at the end of 2008 in the opening balance sheets of 2008 acquisitions not yet definitive as of December 31, 2008 (Tianjin Shibei at Veolia Eau-CGE in China, Bartin Aero Recycling Group at Veolia Propreté, and the Praterm Group at Veolia Energie in Poland) were not materially changed during the 12-month allocation period following their acquisition date.



F-114



Back to Contents



NOTE 32

Construction contracts

As described in Note 1.23, Veolia recognizes its construction contracts under the percentage of completion method. At each period-end, a statement per contract compares the amount of costs incurred, plus profits (including any provisions for losses to completion) with the intermediary billings: “Construction contracts in progress / Assets” is therefore a contract for which the costs incurred and profits recognized exceed the billing issued.

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December31, 2008

As of
December 31,2007

Construction contracts in progress / Assets (A)

358.7

495.6

593.8

Construction contracts in progress / Liabilities (B)

292.4

332.2

232.0

Construction contracts in progress / net (A) – (B)

66.3

163.4

361.8

Costs incurred plus income and losses recognized to date (C)

5,413.7

4,404.8

4,068.7

Amounts billed (D)

5,347.4

4,241.4

3,706.9

Construction contracts in progress / net (C) – (D)

66.3

163.4

361.8

Customer advances

36.8

355.8

41.2


NOTE 33

Operating leases

The Group enters into operating leases (mainly for transportation equipment and constructions).

The future minimum lease payments under operating leases amount to €2,753.7 million as of December 31, 2009, compared to €2,530.4 million as of December 31, 2008 and €2,190.0 million as of December 31, 2007.

As of December 31, 2009, future minimum lease payments under these contracts were as follows:

(€ million)

Operating lease

2010

567.7

2011 & 2012

864.5

2013 & 2014

624.6

2015 and thereafter

696.9

Total future minimum lease payments

2,753.7


Lease payments for the period

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31, 2007

Minimum lease payments expensed in the period

630.9

609.7

523.4

Contingent rent expensed in the period

18.7

13.6

17.1

Total lease payments for the period

649.6

623.3

540.5


Sub-lease revenue is not material.

Assets leased under operating leases

The value of assets concerned by operating leases within the Group is not material



F-115



Back to Contents


NOTE 34

Proportionately consolidated companies

Summarized financial information in respect of proportionately consolidated companies is set out below (Group part):

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31, 2007

Non-current assets

8,188.4

7,682.7

6,757.3

Current assets

3,984.1

3,670.8

3,115.5

Total assets

12,172.5

11,353.5

9,872.8

Equity attributable to owners of the Company 

3,128.1

2,910.7

2,295.9

Equity attributable to non-controlling interests

915.1

801.6

895.5

Non-current liabilities

3,295.8

3,016.6

2,650.8

Current liabilities

4,833.4

4,624.6

4,030.6

Total equity and liabilities

12,172.4

11,353.5

9,872.8


(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31, 2007

Income Statement data

   

Revenue

5,520.3

5,481.1

4,623.7

Operating income

636.8

612.6

659.9

Net income for the year

326.5

261.2

322.9

Financing data

  

 

Operating cash flows

819.8

712.3

567.0

Investing cash flows

(644.9)

(621.7)

(566.8)

Financing cash flows

(316.1)

(533.2)

(289.9)


The most material proportionately consolidated are as follows:

BWB (Berlin water services company) in the Water Division in Germany is 50% consolidated and contributed revenue of €602 million, operating income of €225 million, net assets of €2,735 million and net debt of €1,498 million;

Dalkia International is 75.81% consolidated and contributed revenue of €2,282 million, operating income of €158 million and net assets of €1,857 million;

The Proactiva Group in South America contributed revenue of €202 million, operating income of €26 million and net assets of €108 million;

The Shenzhen and Tianjin Shibei contracts in the Water Division in China are 25% and 49% consolidated respectively and contributed €138 million and €48 million respectively to revenue and €237 million and €150 million respectively to net assets;

A change in the governance of the partnership with Mubadala Development Company on December 22, 2009 led to a change in consolidation method (from full to proportionate consolidation) for the activity of the Water Division in North Africa and the Middle East. This change in governance also resulted in financial debt restructuring, whereby the Group granted a 16-year loan for €121 million at a fixed rate of 5.7% (market conditions).



F-116



Back to Contents


NOTE 35

Tax audits

In the normal course of their business, the Group entities in France and abroad are subjected to regular tax audits.

In France, the tax authorities have carried out various tax audits in respect of both consolidated tax groups and individual entities, including a significant number of reviews focusing specifically on local taxes. The tax audits concerning the major Group companies in France, including Veolia Environnement SA, were closed in 2009. To date, none of these reviews have led to material liabilities to the tax authorities in excess of amounts estimated during the review of tax risks and the booking of provisions in accordance with IAS 37. Certain amounts are still being negotiated with the French tax authorities.

Outside France, the Group is present in numerous countries and is constantly subject to tax audits. Among the countries where the Group has a strong presence, tax audits were in progress as of December 31, 2008 in Germany and Morocco were completed in 2009. The liabilities arising from these tax audits had been anticipated and provided for in accordance with IAS 37.

Tax audits are still in progress, particularly in Italy. Discussions continued in 2009 with the Italian tax authorities. Where necessary, revised assessments and identified uncertain tax positions in respect of which a revised assessment has not been yet issued are adequately provided, and provision amounts are regularly reviewed in accordance with IAS37 criteria.

In the United States, the Group has launched a pre-filing agreement procedure with the Internal Revenue Service (I.R.S) in order to validate the amount of tax losses as of December 31, 2006, following the reorganization of Water Division activities (“Worthless Stock Deduction”). This reorganization led to the recognition of ordinary losses resulting from the operations and disposal of former U.S. Filter activities in respect of fiscal years 1999 to 2004, in an amount which could exceed U.S.$ 4 billion. No major event took place in 2009 that could call into question the Group’s position.

NOTE 36

Off-balance sheet commitments

Specific commitments given

Specific Berlin contract commitments

Under the Berlin water contract, the Group plans to acquire easement rights of passage for water pipes from landowners.

The gross amount of this investment could reach €426 million (50%), approximately €175 million of which would be borne by the Berlin Lander, representing a net commitment of €250 million.

Given the uncertain nature of estimating these easement rights, this commitment was retained off-balance sheet as of December 31, 2007.

More precise estimates were performed in 2008, producing a valuation of €113 million (100%), including a portion, estimated at €57 million, to be reimbursed by the Berlin Lander. The Group therefore recognized an asset and operating liability of €113 million. As these rights vest over the period to 2011, the amounts paid will be recorded, net of amounts reimbursed by the Berlin Lander, in financial assets and remunerated pursuant to the contract.

Agreements with EDF

Veolia Environnement granted EDF a call option covering all of its Dalkia shares in the event an EDF competitor takes control of the company.

Likewise EDF granted Veolia Environnement a call option covering all of its Dalkia shares, exercisable in the event of a change in the legal status of EDF and should a Veolia Environnement competitor, acting alone or in concert, take control of EDF. Failing an agreement on the share transfer price, this would be decided by an expert.



F-117



Back to Contents


Other commitments given

Other commitments and contingencies include neither collateral guarantees supporting borrowings (see Note 38) nor specific commitments and contingencies described above.

Other off-balance sheet commitments break down as follows:

(€ million)

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2008

As of December 31, 2009

Maturing in

Less than
1 year

1 to 5 years

More than
5 years

Operational guarantees including performance bonds

5,591.4

6,624.9

6,950.9

2,442.4

2,418.8

2,089,7

Financial guarantees

 835.6

667.5

679.4

229.4

275.8

174.2

Debt guarantees

355.6

303.0

258.3

89.3

113.6

55.4

Vendor warranties received

480.0

364.5

421.1

140.1

162.2

118.8

Commitments given

617.1

507.8

431.6

283.7

97.6

50.3

Purchase commitments

589.9

476.5

425.1

277.8

97.6

49.7

Sales commitments

27.2

31.3

6.5

5.9

-

0.6

Other commitments given

957.3

912.7

1,065.3

489.4

267.2

308.7

Letters of credit

573.8

706.7

604.5

329.1

152.1

123.3

Other commitments given

383.5

206.0

460.8

160.3

115.1

185.4

Other commitments given

8,001.4

8,712.9

9,127.2

3,444.9

3,059.4

2,622.9


Operational guarantees: operational or operating guarantees encompass all commitments not relating to the financing of operations, required in respect of contracts and markets and more generally the operations and activities of Group companies. Such guarantees include bid bonds accompanying tender offers, advance payment bonds and completion or performance bonds given on the signature of contracts or concession arrangements.

Debt guarantees: these relate to guarantees given to financial institutions in connection with the financial debts of non-consolidated companies, equity associates, or the non-consolidated portion of financial debts of proportionately consolidated companies when the commitment covers the entire amount.

Vendor warranties: these include warranties linked to the sale in 2004 of Water activities in the United States in the amount of €246.5 million.

Purchase commitments: these include commitments given by Group companies to purchase shares in other companies or to invest. As of December 31, 2009, these commitments mainly concerned the Energy Services Division (€82.4 million), the Environmental Services Division (€23.0 million), the Transportation Division (€41.1 million) and the Water Division (€241.7 million).

Letters of credit: letters of credit delivered by financial institutions to Group creditors, customers and suppliers guaranteeing operating activities.

These off-balance sheet commitments notably include:

- Off-balance sheet commitments and site restoration provisions:

Pursuant to environmental texts and legislation concerning the operation of waste storage facilities, the Group is obliged to provide financial guarantees to local authorities/government agencies. These guarantees notably encompass the restoration and supervision of the site during 30 years or more, depending on national legislation (currently 60 years in the United Kingdom), following its operation.

In this context, performance bonds, letters of credit, etc. are issued to local authorities and other public bodies.

Depending on the contract, these guarantees cover the costs necessary for the restoration of all or part of the site and the supervision of the site during 30 years.

These guarantees are quantified in accordance with legally or contractually-defined procedures. These guarantees, which are given in their total amount from the start of operations, expire at the end of the commitment (termination of restoration work and site supervision).



F-118



Back to Contents


Therefore, the amount of our commitment for the restoration and supervision of waste storage facilities is in general different from the amount of the provision recorded in the Group accounts (see Note 1.13).

Provisions calculated by the Group are based on different valuations (based on internal policies regarding site security and designed for optimal environmental protection), which take into account the progressive nature of the obligation: operation of the storage facility results in progressive damage to the site and, as such, a related liability is recognized as the facility is operated.

If the amount of the commitment is less than the provision at the balance sheet date, an off-balance sheet commitment is not disclosed. Conversely, if the amount of the commitment is greater than the provision, an off-balance sheet commitment is disclosed in the amount not provided.

-engineering and construction activities:

Total commitments given in respect of construction activities in the Water Division (Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies) amount to €2,823.6 million as of December 31, 2009, compared to €2,969.8 million as of December 31, 2008 and €1,630.4 million as of December 31, 2007.

Total commitments received (see below) in respect of these same activities amount to €757.2 million as of December 31, 2009, compared to €856.9 million as of December 31, 2008 and €866.2 million as of December 31, 2007.

Commitments given and received in respect of the five principal contracts account for approximately 80% of total commitments.

-commitments given in respect of concession contracts:

Pursuant to public service contracts with a public entity, the Group may be called on/obliged to invest in infrastructures that will then be operated and remunerated in accordance with contractual terms and conditions.

The contractual commitment may concern both the financing of installations and infrastructures to be used in operations and also the maintenance and replacement of infrastructures necessary to operations.

An analysis of the accounting treatment of these commitments is presented in Notes 1.21, 1.14 and 17.

Expenditure relating to the replacement or restoration of installations is monitored and recognized through any timing differences between the total contractual commitment over the contract term and its realization, in accordance with the IAS 37 on Provisions.

Expenditure relating to the construction, maintenance and restoration of concession assets is reviewed with respect to IFRIC 12 and detailed in Note 1.21.

Firm commodity purchase commitments:

As part of supply management and cost optimization, certain Group subsidiaries may be required, depending on their activities, to set-up derivatives to fix the cost of commodity supplies where the contracts do not offer appropriate protection (see Note 29.1.3) or contract forward purchases or sales of commodities.

Firm commodity purchase commitments mainly concern:

coal in the Energy Services Division in Central European countries

gas in the Energy Services Division (mainly in France) and in the Water Division

electricity in the Water Division

With regard to both gas and electricity, the number of contracts signed enables the Group to significantly reduce political and counterparty risk.

forward purchases of fuel are primarily contracted by the Transportation Division (SNCM).



F-119



Back to Contents


Other commitments given break down by Division as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31, 2007

Water

6,036.4

5,891.8

4,368.3

Environmental Services

831.1

901.7

1,171.1

Energy Services

700.3

538.1

755.7

Transportation

533.2

415.8

398.3

Proactiva

45.2

50.6

39.8

Holding companies

942.0

891.3

1,241.5

Other

39.0

23.6

26.7

Total

9,127.2

8,712.9

8,001.4


Lease contracts entered into by the Group are analyzed in Notes 17 and 33.

Contingent assets and liabilities relating to legal or arbitration proceedings

On September 12, 2008, a suburban train operated by Connex Railroad LLC, a Veolia Transport subsidiary, on behalf of the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA), collided with a Union Pacific freight train in Chatsworth, California. This accident resulted in 25 fatalities and a significant number of injuries. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), a federal agency, with which Connex Railroad is cooperating, reached a preliminary conclusion that the two causes of the accident were, first, lack of attention by the engineer, who did not observe a red light and, second, the fact that the SCRRA had not installed an automatic train braking system in compliance with prior recommendations of the NTSB. Actions seeking an undetermined amount of total damages have been filed by the heirs of the deceased passengers and the majority of injured passengers, in the courts of the state of California in Los Angeles, against Connex Railroad LLC, its parent company, Veolia Transportation Inc., the SCRRA and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. These actions have been consolidated into a single case. A hearing specifically dedicated to the issue of liability is scheduled for November 2010. At the same time, Connex Railroad LLC and the SCRRA have brought before the federal courts in California their disputes concerning their respective contractual liability in connection with the suits filed as a result of this accident and are still awaiting a hearing date. A U.S. federal statute limits the total amount of damages that may be awarded for injuries and property damage arising from a single passenger rail accident to U.S.$200 million. Notice of this accident has been given to the relevant insurers of the Group. At this point, the Group is unable to determine whether the financial consequences of this accident could significantly affect its financial position or results.

Furthermore, the Group is subject to several other litigations in the normal course of its business. In accordance with IAS 37 criteria, management does not consider it appropriate to record a provision or recognize deferred income in respect of these legal or arbitration proceedings at the balance sheet date, due to the uncertain nature of their outcome.

Commitments received

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31, 2007

Guarantees received

1,756.3

2,082.0

1,459.7

Debt guarantees

303.4

351.6

266.6

Vendor warranties received

142.0

294.8

53.6

Other guarantees received

1,310.9

1,435.6

1,139.5


The commitments notably consist of commitments received from our partners in respect of construction contracts.

The decrease in 2009 was mainly due to the expiry of a warranty obtained from an acquisition in the Environmental Services Division, the partial terminations in the Construction activity of Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies and the cancellation of the guarantee received from the British Treasury for a credit line repaid at the start of the year.

In addition, the Group has undrawn medium and short-term credit lines and syndicated loans in the amount of €4.7 billion (see Note 29.3).



F-120



Back to Contents


NOTE 37

Greenhouse gas emission rights

The process governing the grant and valuation of these rights is presented in Note 1.25, Greenhouse gas emission rights.

The position in 2009 is as follows:

Volume in thousands of metric tons

As of January 1, 2009

Entries into the consolidation scope

Granted

Purchased / sold / cancelled

Consumed

As of December 31, 2009

Total

1,363

433

13,504

441

(12,187)

3,554


Similarly to 2008, the Group entered into new swaps of EUA II and CER in order to benefit from market opportunities.

At the end of 2007 and during 2008, the Group entered into allowance loan transactions (EUA II and CER) effective in 2008 with surrender in 2012. The commission received on allowance loans is recorded on receipt as deferred income and recognized in the Income Statement on a straight-line basis over the loan term.

Entries into the scope of consolidation concern Energy Services Division acquisitions in France.

Phase II rights granted free of charge for fiscal years 2010-2012 are estimated at €515 million. Future allocations were measured using the spot price as of December 31, 2009.

NOTE 38

Collateral given supporting borrowings

As of December 31, 2009, the Group has given €699 million of collateral guarantees in support of borrowings. The breakdown by type of asset is as follows (€ million):

Type of pledge / mortgage

Amount pledged (a)

Total consolidated statement of financial position amount (b)

Corresponding %

(a) / (b)

Intangible assets

5

1,438

0.35%

Property, plant and equipment

151

9,382

1.61%

Financial assets*

504

-

-

Total non-current assets

660

-

-

Current assets

39

20,222

0.19%

Total assets

699

-

-


*

As a majority of financial assets pledged as collateral are shares of consolidated subsidiaries and other financial assets, the ratio is not significant.




F-121



Back to Contents


The breakdown by maturity is as follows:

(€ million)

As of December 31,2007

As of December 31, 2008

As of December 31, 2009

Maturing in

Less than
1 year

1 to 5
years

More than
5 years

Intangible assets

2

2

5

-

1

4

Property, plant and equipment

293

225

151

19

40

92

Mortgage pledge

15

16

37

3

3

31

Other PP&E pledge(1)

278

209

114

16

37

61

Financial assets(2)

313

588

504

10

65

429

Current assets

26

109

39

3

9

27

Pledges on receivables

23

108

39

3

9

27

Pledges on inventories

3

1

0

-

-

-

Total

634

924

699

32

115

552


(1)

mainly equipment and traveling systems.

(2)

including non-consolidated investments of €198 million and other financial assets (primarily operating financial assets) of €306 million as of December 31, 2009.


NOTE 39

Related-party transactions

The purpose of this note is to present related-party transactions.

39.1

“Related party” concept

Group related parties comprise, in accordance with IAS 24, Related Party Disclosures, the companies over which the Group exercises control, joint control or significant influence (joint ventures and equity associates), shareholders who exercise joint control over group joint ventures, minority shareholders who exercise significant influence over group subsidiaries, key management personnel of the group and the companies over which the latter exercise control, joint control or significant influence or in which they hold significant voting rights.

In addition, as the share capital of the Group is widely held, certain shareholders holding a small stake in the share capital are nonetheless considered related parties.

39.2

Compensation and related benefits of key management personnel

Group Executive Committee members and directors represent the key management personnel of the Group.

The following table summarizes amounts due by the Group in respect of compensation and other benefits granted to key management personnel:

(€ million)

As of
December 31,
2009

As of
December 31,
2008

As of
December 31,
2007

Short-term benefits, excluding employer contributions(a)

4.7

8.2

6.9

Employer contributions

2.0

3.2

2.5

Post-employment benefits(b)

1.1

1.2

1.0

Other long-term benefits(c)

-

-

-

Share-based payments

0.6

1.0

1.6

Contract termination payments

-

-

-

Total

8.4

13.6

12.0

(a)

Fixed and variable compensation, employee benefits and directors fees. Variable compensations comprise amounts due in respect of the fiscal year and paid during the next fiscal year.

(b)

Current service costs.

(c)

Other compensation vested but payable in the long-term.




F-122



Back to Contents


All the Board of Directors members, except the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, only receive as compensation director’s fees from Veolia Environnement and its controlled companies. Director’s fees paid to Directors, excluding the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, totaled €771,795 in 2009, €771,952 in 2008 and €741,380 in 2007.

Item 6 of this annual report filed on Form 20-F contains detailed disclosures on compensation and benefits paid to key management personnel of the Group.

39.3

Transactions with other related parties

39.3.1

Relations with proportionately consolidated companies and equity associates

The Group granted a loan of €1,614.9 million to Dalkia International and its subsidiaries Siram and Dalkia Pologne, which are proportionately consolidated at 75.81% The non-group portion of this loan is recorded in assets in the Group consolidated statement of financial position in the amount of €390.8 million (see Note 11 Other non-current financial assets).

In December 2009, the Group sold its investment in Compagnie Méridionale de Navigation (CMN) which was consolidated using the equity method.

In addition, given the Group’s businesses, operating flows between companies are generally limited to companies operating in the same country. As such, the level of operating transactions between the Group and proportionately consolidated companies is not material.

However, certain contractual agreements within the Water Division, notably in Asia and Central Europe, impose the existence of a holding company (generally equity accounted or proportionately consolidated) and companies carrying the operating contract (generally fully consolidated). These complex legal arrangements generate “asset supply” flows between the companies generally jointly controlled or subject to significant influence and the companies controlled by the Group. Assets are generally supplied for a specific remuneration that may or may not include the maintenance of the installations in good working order or the technical improvement of the installations.

39.3.2

Relations with Group shareholders

Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations (with a 9.58% interest in share capital).

The Chief Executive Officer of this financial institution is represented on the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement.

The Group had the following relations with the Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations during fiscal 2009:

the financing agreements between the two groups bear interest at market conditions.

in connection with the ongoing combination at the year-end between Veolia Transport and Transdev.

Electricité de France (with a 3.70% interest in share capital as of December 31, 2009).

On November 25, 2009, Mr. Proglio was appointed Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the EDF Group by ministerial decree; he also acts as Chairman of the Veolia Environnement Group Board of Directors from November 27, 2009 (publication date of the decree).

EDF Group has a 3.70% interest in Veolia Environnement, a 34% interest in Dalkia and a 25% interest in Dalkia International. In accordance with the Decree 97-07, EDF purchases electricity produced in France by Dalkia cogeneration power plants at market conditions. Electricity sold by Dalkia to EDF in 2007, 2008 and 2009 totaled €521.7 million, €608.4 million and €568.7 million, respectively.



F-123



Back to Contents


There are under certain conditions cross options between Veolia Environnement and EDF for all the securities held by each party in case of taking control of one or the other (see Note 36 Off-balance sheet commitments).

BNP Paribas (with a 0.57% interest in share capital as of December 31, 2009)

The Chief Executive Officer of BNP Paribas is represented on the Board of Directors of Veolia. The financing agreements between the two groups bear interest at market conditions.

Société Générale (with a 0.15% interest in share capital as of December 31, 2009)

The financing agreements between the two groups bear interest at market conditions.

Mr. Bouton, member of the Veolia Environnement Board of Directors, is no longer Chairman of the Board of Directors of Société Générale as of May 6, 2009.

Vivendi Universal undertook to pay an indemnity to Veolia Environnement in respect of the financial management of replacement expenses and then transferred this obligation to Société Générale under a perfect delegation contract on December 21, 2004. As such, Vivendi Universal no longer has an obligation to Veolia Environnement with respect thereto.

Conversely, Société Générale, considered a related party, is liable to Veolia Environnement in this respect for a maximum amount of €17.6 million as of December 31, 2008, which was claimed in its entirety as of December 31, 2009.

39.3.3

Relations with other related parties

Relations with Lazard, Groupama, ENI and Saint Gobain

These Groups and Véolia Environnement have common directors.

Any business relations between these groups and Veolia are maintained at market conditions.

Relations with EBRD

The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) holds non-controlling interests in Group operating entities in Central Europe, primarily in the Energy Services, Transportation and Water Divisions.

In 2009, the EBRD acquired an additional 6.88% interest in Veolia Voda, which encompasses all the operating activities of the Water Division in Central Europe.



F-124



Back to Contents


NOTE 40

Consolidated employees

Consolidated employees * break down as follows:

By division

As of
December 31,
2009

As of
December 31,
2008(1)

As of
December 31,
2007(1)

Water

80,239

78,040

74,280

Environmental Services

80,693

95,399

84,994

Energy Services

44,748

44,370

46,387

Transportation

78,094

74,526

73,299

Proactiva

5,400

4,823

4,503

Other

1,826

807

609

Consolidated employees*

291,000

297,965

284,072


By company

As of
December 31,
2009

As of
December 31,
2008(1)

As of
December 31,
2007(1)

Fully consolidated companies

240,657

251,772

241,857

Proportionately consolidated companies

50,343

46,193

42,215

Consolidated employees*

291,000

297,965

284,072


*

Consolidated employees equal the average number of full-time equivalent employees. Employees of proportionately consolidated companies are included according to their percentage of consolidation. Employees of equity associates are not included.

(1)

The information presented for fiscal years 2007 and 2008 includes the employees of entities divested in 2009. In 2007, the average number of employees in the Environmental Services and Transportation Divisions totaled 9,095 and 2,391, respectively, in 2007 and 10,953 and 2,682, respectively, in 2008. Furthermore, the 2007 figures included the employees of the Clemmessy and Crystal entities of the Energy Division that were divested in 2008.


The decrease in the average number of employees in 2009 was primarily due to the divestment of VPNM in the Environmental Services division and the sale of Freight activity in the Transportation division.

NOTE 41

Reporting by operating segment

Since January 1, 2009, the Group has identified and presented segment reporting in accordance with IFRS 8 “Operating segments.”

Financial reporting by operating segment is governed by the same rules as those used for the condensed consolidated financial statements and described in the Accounting Policies note to the Financial Statements.

This reporting is based on the internal organization of the Group’s activities and corresponds to the Group’s four business segments (which were used for the primary segment reporting under the previous standard – IAS 14) Water, Environmental Services, Energy Services and Transportation.

TheWater segment integrates drinking water and wastewater activities such as water distribution, water and wastewater treatment, industrial process water, manufacturing of water treatment equipment and systems.

TheEnvironmental Services segment collects, processes and disposes of household, trade and industrial waste.

TheEnergy Services segment includes heat production and distribution, energy optimization and related services, and electricity production.

TheTransportation segment focuses on the operation of passenger transportation services.



F-125



Back to Contents


Pursuant to IFRS 5, Non-Current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations, the results of operations of:

the Clemessy and Crystal entities, in the Energy Services Division, sold in December 2008,

waste-to-energy activity entities in the United States (Montenay International) in the Environmental Services Division and Freight activity entities in the Transportation Division, sold during the second semester of 2009,

activities in the United Kingdom in the Transportation Division and renewable energy activities in the process of being sold

were grouped together in a single line, Net income from discontinued operations, for fiscal year 2009 and fiscal years 2008 and 2007 presented for comparison purposes.

Operating segments

Revenue by segment

(€ million)

Year ended
December 31,
2009

Year ended
December 31,
2008

Year ended
December 31,
2007

Water

12,555.9

12,557.9

10,927.4

Environmental Services

9,055.8

9,972.5

9,057.2

Energy Services

7,078.6

7,446.3

6,200.4

Transportation

5,860.7

5,788.1

5,389.1

Revenue as per the consolidated income statement

34,551.0

35,764.8

31,574.1


Inter-segment revenue

(€ million)

Year ended December 31,
2009

Year ended December 31,2008

Year ended December 31,2007

Water

67.6

36.6

25.5

Environmental Services

93.5

99.8

80.9

Energy Services

53.9

59.7

39.1

Transportation

4.7

4.6

5.2

Inter-segment revenue

219.7

200.7

150.7


Operating income by segment

(€ million)

Year ended December 31,
2009

Year ended December 31,
2008

Year ended December 31,
2007

Water

1164.3

1,198.5

1,267.7

Environmental Services

453.8

265.2

781.8

Energy Services

415.5

434.4

384.3

Transportation

152.9

170.5

130.6

Total operating segments

2,186.5

2,068.6

2,564.4

Unallocated operating income

(166.4)

(107.8)

(103.3)

Operating income as per the consolidated income statement

2,020.1

1,960.8

2,461.1


Operating cash flow before changes in working capital by business segment

(€ million)

Year ended December 31,
2009

Year ended December 31,
2008

Year ended December 31,
2007

Water

1,800.9

1,795.4

1,848.4

Environmental Services

1,194.1

1,357.5

1,456.3

Energy Services

736.9

768.4

656.0

Transportation

311.5

291.8

280.2

Total operating segments

4,043.4

4,213.1

4,240.9

Unallocated operating cash flow before changes in working capital

(104.8)

(34.7)

(21.5)

Operating cash flow before changes in working capital in the consolidated cash flow statement

3,938.6

4,178.4

4,219.4




F-126



Back to Contents



Net charge to operating depreciation, amortization and provisions by segment(*)

(€ million)

Year ended
December 31,
2009

Year ended
December 31,
2008

Year ended
December 31,
2007

Water

(505.3)

(461.7)

(396.0)

Environmental Services

(871.9)

(754.9)

(685.3)

Energy Services

(268.8)

(226.6)

(147.9)

Transportation

(197.1)

(160.1)

(176.9)

Total business segments

(1,843.1)

(1,603.3)

(1,406.1)

Unallocated net charge to operating depreciation, amortization and provisions (**)

(47.9)

(28.7)

(29.3)

Net charge to operating depreciation, amortization and provisions

(1,891.0)

(1,632.0)

(1,435.4)


(*)

including movements in provisions for working capital requirement

(**)

including Proactiva and Artelia


Capital expenditure by segment

(€ million)

Year ended
December 31,
2009

Year ended
December 31,
2008

Year ended
December 31,
2007

Water

835

950

869

Environmental Services

626

990

863

Energy Services

531

539

429

Transportation

445

342

459

Unallocated capital expenditure

56

72

22

Total capital expenditure(1)

2,493

2,893

2,642


(1)

Pursuant to IFRS 8, capital expenditure presented in segment reporting includes investments financed by finance lease in the amount of €28 million, net of the capital expenditure presented in the consolidated cash flow statement.


Assets by segment as of December 31, 2009

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Unallocated amounts

Total
assets in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position

Goodwill, net

2,253.3

2,678.4

1,147.9

537.6

7.4

6,624.6

Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, net

5,836.5

4,167.8

2,492.4

1,669.8

278.5

14,445.0

Operating financial assets

4,059.1

754.5

654.4

105.4

78.4

5,651.8

Working capital assets including DTA

6,504.3

2,772.2

3,590.5

1,269.4

729.7

14,866.1

Total segment assets

18,653.2

10,372.9

7,885.2

3,582.2

1,094.0

41,587.5

Investments in associates

148.1

62.0

55.3

2.9

0.2

268.5

Other unallocated assets(1)

    

7,960.7

7,960.7

Total assets

18,801.3

10,434.9

7,940.5

3,585.1

9,054.9

49,816.7


(1)

including Proactiva and Artelia.




F-127



Back to Contents



Assets by segment as of December 31, 2008

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Unallocated amounts

Total
assets in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position

Goodwill, net

2,247.7

2,736.6

1,131.1

551.4

56.5

6,723.3

Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, net

5,887.6

4,388.0

2,374.7

1,724.8

224.9

14,600.0

Operating financial assets

4,083.2

836.9

679.5

105.5

46.1

5,751.2

Working capital assets including DTA

6,496.8

3,116.4

3,883.3

1,396.7

801.5

15,694.7

Total segment assets

18,715.3

11,077.9

8,068.6

3,778.4

1,129.0

42,769.2

Investments in associates

140.7

81.3

27.7

58.2

3.7

311.6

Other unallocated assets(1)

    

6,045.3 *

6,045.3

Total assets

18,856.0

11,159.2

8,096.3

3,836.6

7,178.0

49,126.1

*

Including assets classified as held for sale of €203.0 million (primarily the reclassification of the assets of certain French subsidiaries under joint control in the Water Division).

(1): including Proactiva and Artelia.


Assets by segment as of December 31, 2007

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Unallocated amounts

Total
assets in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position

Goodwill, net

2,208.2

3,049.5

1,098.1

556.7

0.7

6,913.2

Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, net

5,658.3

4,292.4

2,112.0

1,694.2

141.9

13,898.8

Operating financial assets

3,884.5

902.4

712.3

123.0

5.4

5,627.6

Working capital assets including DTA

5,847.8

3,257.4

3,755.2

1,321.1

585.4

14,766.9

Total segment assets

17,598.8

11,501.7

7,677.6

3,695.0

733.4

41,206.5

Investments in associates

137.2

75.5

25.5

53.9

-

292.1

Other unallocated assets(1)

    

4,808.3 *

4,808.3

Total assets

17,736.0

11,577.2

7,703.1

3,748.9

5,541.7

46,306.9

*

Including assets classified as held for sale of €122.5 million (Transportation Division for €103.9 million and Environmental Services Division for €18.6 million).

(1)

including Proactiva and Artelia.


Liabilities by segment
as of December 31, 2009

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transport-ation

Unallocated amounts

Total
liabilities in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position

Provisions for contingencies and losses

997.3

985.9

494.6

367.3

195.2

3,040.3

Working capital liabilities including DTL

7,670.0

2,615.9

2,878.2

1,558.4

304.4

15,026.9

Other segment liabilities

      

Total segment liabilities

8,667.3

3,601.8

3,372.8

1,925.7

499.6

18,067.2

Other unallocated liabilities(1)

    

31,749.5

31,749.5

Total liabilities

8,667.3

3,601.8

3,372.8

1,925.7

32,249.1

49,816.7

(1)

including Proactiva and Artelia.



F-128



Back to Contents



Liabilities by segment
as of December 31, 2008

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Unallocated amounts

Total
lliabilities in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position

Provisions for contingencies and losses

1,011.1

871.9

468.1

422.4

159.8

2,933.3

Working capital liabilities including DTL

7,599.6

3,056.5

2,956.8

1,598.3

316.5

15,527.8

Other segment liabilities

      

Total segment liabilities

8,610.7

3,928.4

3,424.9

2,020.7

476.4

18,461.1

Other unallocated liabilities(1)

    

30,665.0*

30,665.0

Total liabilities

8,610.7

3,928.4

3,424.9

2,020.7

31,141.4

49,126.1

*

Including liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale of €98.2 million (reclassification of the liabilities of certain French subsidiaries under joint control in the Water Division).

(1)

including Proactiva and Artelia.


Liabilities by segment
as of December 31,
2007

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Unallocated amounts

Total
liabilities in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position

Provisions for contingencies and losses

1,013.9

873.6

476.1

456.7

144.3

2,964.6

Working capital liabilities including DTL

6,855.4

3,138.3

2,996.7

1,544.1

205.0

14,739.5

Other segment liabilities

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total segment liabilities

7,869.3

4,011.9

3,472.8

2,000.8

349.3

17,704.1

Other unallocated liabilities(1)

    

28,602.8 *

28,602.8

Total liabilities

7,869.3

4,011.9

3,472.8

2,000.8

28,952.1

46,306.9

*

Including liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale of €1.9 million (Veolia Environnement SA).

(1)

including Proactiva and Artelia.


Geographical area

December 31, 2009

(€ million)

France

Germany

United
Kingdom

Rest of
Europe

United
States

Oceania

Asia

Middle
East

Rest of
the world

Total

Revenue

13,755.4

2,967.3

2,478.1

6,811.2

2,953.0

1,300.2

1,500.7

1,017.6

1,767.5

34,551.0


December 31, 2008

(€ million)

France

Germany

United
Kingdom

Rest of
Europe

United
States

Oceania

Asia

Middle
East

Rest of
the world

Total

Revenue

14,465.0

3,057.3

2,876.9

7,029.5

2,873.4

1,437.7

1,269.9

1,026.8

1,728.3

35,764.8


December 31,
2007

(€ million)

France

Germany

United
Kingdom

Rest of
Europe

United
States

Oceania

Asia

Middle
East

Rest of
the world

Total

Revenue

13,547.3

2,602.0

2,866.0

6,028.6

2,423.3

1,308.2

961.0

447.0

1,390.7

31,574.1




F-129



Back to Contents


Breakdown of non-current assets (excluding deferred tax assets and non-current derivative instruments) by geographical area

December 31,
2009
(€ million)

France

Germany

United
Kingdom

Rest of
Europe

United
States

Oceania

Asia

Middle
East

Rest of
the world

Total

Total

7,518.0

4,701.6

3,282.0

5,143.7

2,619.9

419.3

2,644.1

264.0

949.2

27,541.8


December 31, 2008
(€ million)

France

Germany

United
Kingdom

Rest of
Europe

United
States

Oceania

Asia

Middle
East

Rest of
the world


Total

Total

7,641.9

4,904.0

3,110.4

5,145.4

2,902.5

344.8

2,456.2

284.5

1,164.2

27,953.9


December 31,
2007
(€ million)

France

Germany

United
Kingdom

Rest of
Europe

United
States

Oceania

Asia

Middle
East

Rest of
the world


Total

Total

7,501.6

5,104.4

3,785.3

4,988.7

2,578.9

372.9

1,767.5

117.3

1,162.0

27,378.6


NOTE 42

Post-balance sheet events

In February 2010, Veolia Environnement announced that it transferred to Covanta Holding Corporation the contract for the operation of the waste-to-energy plant in the County of Miami-Dade. Veolia Environnement has now transferred to Covanta Holding the North American portfolio of waste-to-energy contracts in the Environmental Services Division, the sale of which had been announced on July 6, 2009. This sale totaled US$128 million, pursuant to the stipulated financial terms and conditions.

In connection with its strategic repositioning in the Czech Republic, on January 5, 2010, Dalkia signed an agreement for the acquisition of Energy.As which manages the industrial utilities of the mining group OKD. The completion of this transaction is contingent on receipt of the competition authorizations.

Further to the signature of an agreement with Lyonnaise des Eaux on December 19, 2008, an amendment to the agreement for the unwinding of common subsidiaries between Veolia Eau-CGE and Lyonnaise des Eaux France was signed on February 3, 2010. It resulted in a supplementary control of Société des Eaux de Marseille and of Société des Eaux d’Arles to Veolia Eau-CGE. These transactions were completed on March 22, 2010. The contribution in terms of revenue for 2009 of the subsidiaries disposed were € 150 million and € 136 million for the subsidiaries acquired.

In addition, on March 10, 2010, Veolia Environnement received notices of proposed adjustments (“NOPAs”) from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) relating to a number of tax positions relating to its U.S. subsidiaries, including primarily tax losses resulting from the reorganization of the former US Filter.

The Group believes that its tax positions are well-founded and correct in all material respects. It has already commenced, and intends to pursue, discussions with the IRS to have the positions in the NOPAs modified. The NOPAs are preliminary assessments that do not reflect a definitive audit position and are subject to change. The Group hopes to resolve the issues through discussions with the IRS. If necessary, however, the Group is prepared to defend its tax positions vigorously.

The NOPAs relate to the Worthless Stock Deduction, in the amount of US$4.5 billion (see Note 35), for which a deferred tax asset in the amount of 283 million euros has been recorded (see Note 12). They also relate to certain other issues relating to tax losses for the 2004, 2005 and 2006 tax years, in an aggregate amount of a similar order of magnitude as the Worthless Stock Deduction. Based on a preliminary analysis, Veolia Environnement has not recorded any provisions in its consolidated financial statements in respect of the NOPAs.

Because the NOPAs are still subject to the continuing IRS audit process (see Note 35), there is no requirement at this time for any payment of taxes.



F-130



Back to Contents


NOTE 43

Main companies included in the 2009 consolidated financial statements

In 2009, the Group consolidated or accounted for a total of 2,573 companies, of which the principal companies are:

Company and address

French company registration number
(Siret)

Consolidation method

% control

% interest

Veolia Environnement SA

36-38, avenue Kléber – 75116 Paris

40 321 003 200 047

FC

100.00

100.00

Société d’Environnement et de Services de l’Est SAS

2, rue Annette Bloch – 25200 Montbéliard

44 459 092 100 052

FC

99.99

85.44

EOLFI SA and its subsidiaries

25, place de la Madeleine - 75008 Paris

477 951 644 00020

FC

69.11

69.11

PROACTIVA Medio Ambiete SA

Calle Cardenal Marcelo Spinola 8 – 3A –

28016 Madrid (Spain)

 

PC

50.00

50.00

Veolia Energy North America Holding

1250 Handcock Street Suite 204N Quincy Massachusetts 02169 (United States)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Thermal North America Inc

99 summer street; suite 900

Boston Massachusetts 02110 (United States)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

RIDGELINE ENERGY HOLDING INC

The Nemours Building 1007 Orange Street Suite 1414 Wilmington, DL 19801 (United States)

 

FC

100.00

69.11

Veolia Environnement Europe Services SA

Rue des Deux Eglises 26 B-

1000 Brussels (Belgium)

RPM Bruxelles : BCE 0894.628.426

FC

100.00

100.00

WATER

    

Veolia Eau - Compagnie Générale des Eaux

52, rue d’Anjou – 75008 Paris

57 202 552 600 029

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Water

52, rue d’Anjou – 75008 Paris

42 134 504 200 012

FC

100.00

100.00

Including the following companies in France:

    

Compagnie des Eaux et de l’Ozone

52, rue d’Anjou – 75008 Paris

77 566 736 301 597

FC

100.00

100.00

Société Française de Distribution d’Eau

7, rue Tronson-du-Coudray – 75008 Paris

54 205 494 500 382

FC

99.56

99.56

Compagnie Fermière de Services Publics

3, rue Marcel Sembat – Immeuble CAP 44

44100 Nantes

57 575 016 100 342

FC

99.87

99.87

Compagnie Méditerranéenne d’Exploitation des Services d’Eau – CMESE

12, boulevard René Cassin – 06100 Nice

78 015 329 200 112

FC

99.72

99.72

Société des Eaux de Melun

Zone Industrielle – 198/398, rue Foch

77000 Vaux Le Pénil

78 575 105 800 047

FC

99.29

99.29

Société des Eaux de Marseille

25, rue Edouard Delanglade – BP 29

13254 Marseille

5 780 615 000 017

PC

48.85

48.85


Consolidation method

FC: Full consolidation – PC: Proportionate consolidation – EA: Equity associate




F-131



Back to Contents



Company and address

French company registration number
(Siret)

Consolidation method

% control

% interest

WATER

    

Société des Eaux du Nord

217, boulevard de la Liberté – 59800 Lille

57 202 641 700 244

PC

49.55

49.55

Société des Eaux de Versailles et de Saint-Cloud

145, rue Yves le Coz – 78000 Versailles

31 863 464 900 053

PC

50.00

50.00

Sade-Compagnie Générale de Travaux d’Hydraulique (CGTH-SADE) and its subsidiaries

28, rue de la Baume – 75008 Paris

56 207 750 300 018

FC

99.26

99.26

Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies and its subsidiaries l’Aquarène – 1, place Montgolfier

94417 St Maurice Cedex

41 498 621 600 037

FC

100.00

100.00

OTV France

l’Aquarène – 1 place Montgolfier

94417 St Maurice Cedex

433 998 473 000 14

FC

100.00

100.00

Société Internationale de Dessalement (SIDEM)

20-22 rue de Clichy – 75009 Paris

342 500 956 000 12

FC

100.00

100.00

Including the following foreign companies:

    

Veolia Water UK PLC and its subsidiaries

Kings Place – 5th Floor - 90 York Way -

London N19AG (United Kingdom)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Water Central Ltd

Tamblin Way – Hatfield –

Hertfordshire AL109EZ (United Kingdom)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Water North America and its subsidiaries

200 E. Randolph St., Suite 7900

Chicago, IL 60601 (United States)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Wasser GmbH and its subsidiaries

Lindencorso Unter den linden 21

10 117 Berlin (Germany)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Berliner Wasserbetriebe Anstalt des Offentlichen Rechts

Neue Jüdenstrasse 1

10179 Berlin (Germany)

 

PC

49.90

24.95

Braunschweiger Versorgungs- AG &Co.KG

Taubenstrasse 7 D-38 106 Braunschweig (Germany)

 

FC

74.90

74.90

Aquiris SA

Avenue de Vilvorde 450

1130 Brussels (Belgium)

 

FC

99.00

99.00

Apa Nova Bucuresti Srl

Strada Aristide Demetriade nr 2, Sector 1,

Bucarest (Romania)

 

FC

73.69

73.69

Veolia Voda and its subsidiaries

52, rue d’Anjou – 75 008 Paris

434 934 809 00016

FC

83.12

83.12


Consolidation method

FC: Full consolidation – PC: Proportionate consolidation – EA: Equity associate




F-132



Back to Contents



Company and address

French company registration number
(Siret)

Consolidation method

% control

% interest

WATER

    

Prazske Vodovody A Kanalizagce As

11 Parizska –

11 000 Prague 1 (Czech Republic)

 

FC

100.00

83.12

Severoceske Vodovody A Kanalizagce As

1 689 Pritkovska

41 550 Teplice (Czech Republic)

 

FC

50.10

41.64

Shenzhen Water (Group) Co. Ltd and its subsidiaries

Water Building, N°1019 Shennan Zhong Road,

518031 SHENZHEN, GuangDong (China)

 

PC

45.00

25.00

Shanghai Pudong Veolia Water Corporation Ltd

No. 703 Pujian Road, Pudong New District,

200127 SHANGHAI (China)

 

PC

50.00

50.00

Changzhou CGE Water Co Ltd

No.12 Juqian Road, CHANGZHOU Municipality, Jiangsu Province, 213000 (China)

 

PC

49.00

24.99

Kunming CGE Water Supply Co Ltd

No. 626 Beijing Road, KUNMING City, Yunnan Province, 650051 (China)

 

PC

49.00

24.99

Veolia Water Korea Co Ltd and its subsidiaries

10F Yeonsei Jaeden Severance Bldg.84-11? Namdaemunno 5-ga, Jung-gu, Seoul, 100-753 (South Korea)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Water Australia and its subsidiaries

Level 4, Bay Center, 65 Pirrama Road, Pyrmont NSW 2009 (Australia)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Société d’Energie et d’Eau du Gabon

Avenue Felix Eboué - BP 2082 – Libreville (Gabon)

 

FC

51.00

41.08

AZALIYA

52, rue d’Anjou 75008 Paris

505 190 801 00017

PC

51.00

51.00

Veolia Water Middle East North Africa

(Veolia Water MENA) and its subsidiaries

52, rue d’Anjou – 75 008 Paris

403 105 919 00019

PC

80.55

41.08

Amendis

23, rue Carnot – 90 000 Tangiers (Morocco)

 

PC

100.00

31.22

REDAL SA

6 Zankat Al Hoceima, BP 161 – 10 000 Rabat (Morocco)

 

PC

100.00

31.91

Lanzhou Veolia Water (Group) Co LTD

No. 2 Hua Gong Street, Xigu District, LANZHOU, Gansu Province, (China)

 

PC

45.00

22.95

Sharqiyah Desalination Co. SAOC

PO Box 685, PC 114 Jibroo, Sultanate of Oman

1 011 277

PC

55.00

28.05

Biothane Systems International Holdings B.V.

Thanthofdreef 21 – PO BOX 5068

2623 EW Delft (Netherlands)

27267973

FC

100.00

100.00


Consolidation method

FC: Full consolidation – PC: Proportionate consolidation – EA: Equity associate




F-133



Back to Contents



Company and address

French company registration number
(Siret)

Consolidation method

% control

% interest

WATER

    

Tianjin Jinbin Veolia Water Co

No2 Xinxiang Road, Bridge 4 Jin Tang Expressway, Dongli District, Tianjin Municipality (China)

 

PC

49.00

49.00

Changle Veolia Water Supply Co Ltd

(N°2 Water Plant) Pan Ye Village, Hang Cheng Jie Dao, Changle Municipality, Fujian Province (China)

 

PC

49.00

49.00


ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

    

Veolia Propreté

Parc des Fontaines – 163 / 169, avenue Georges Clémenceau - 92000 Nanterre

57 222 103 400 778

FC

100.00

100.00

Société d’Assainissement Rationnel et de Pompage (S.A.R.P.) and its subsidiaries

52 avenue des Champs Pierreux 92000 Nanterre

77 573 481 700 353

FC

100.00

99.55

SARP Industries and its subsidiaries

427, route du Hazay – Zone Portuaire Limay-Porcheville - 78520 Limay

30 377 298 200 029

FC

100.00

99.85

ROUTIERE DE L’EST PARISIEN

ZI Rue Robert Moinon

95190 GOUSSAINVILLE

61 200 696 500 026

FC

100.00

100.00

ONYX AUVERGNE RHONE ALPES

105 avenue du 8 mai 1945

69140 Rilleux-Le-Pape

30 259 089 800 169

FC

100.00

99.99

VALNOR

5, rue de Courtalin - Val d’Europe

77450 MAGNY LE HONGRE

41 030 116 200 302

FC

100.00

100.00

OTUS

26, avenue des Champs Pierreux

92000 NANTERRE

62 205 759 400 336

FC

100.00

100.00

Bartin Recycling Group and its subsidiaries

15 Rue Albert et Paul Thouvenin

18100 VIERZON

48 141 629 500 014

FC

100.00

100.00

Including the following foreign companies:

    

Veolia ES Holding PLC and its subsidiaries

Veolia house – 154A Pentonville Road

N1 9PE – London (United Kingdom)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Environmental Services North America Corp. 200 East Randolph Street – Suite 7900 Chicago – IL 60601 (United States)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia ES Solid Waste, Inc

One Honey Creed Corporate Center – 125 South

84th Street – Suite 200

WI 53214 Milwaukee (United States)

 

FC

100.00

100.00


Consolidation method

FC: Full consolidation – PC: Proportionate consolidation – EA: Equity associate




F-134



Back to Contents



Company and address

French company
registration number
(Siret)

Consolidation method

% control

% interest

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

    

VES TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS LLC

Butterfield Center

700 East Butterfield Road, #201

60148 LOMBARD (United States)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia ES Industrial Services, Inc

1980 North Highway 146

La Porte 77571 Texas (United States)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

VEOLIA ES CANADA SERVICES INDUSTRIELS INC

1705, 3eme avenue

Canadian Corporate Office - 80 Birmingham Street

L8L 6W5 HAMILTON (Canada)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Environmental Services Australia Pty Ltd

Level 4, Bay Center – 65 Pirrama Road – P.O. Box H126 –NSW 2009 – Pyrmont (Australia)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Environmental Services Asia Pte Ltd

5 Loyang Way 1 – WMX Technologies Building 508706 Singapore

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Environnmental Services China LTD

7/F Allied Kajima Building

138 Gloucester Road – Central - HONG-KONG

 

FC

100.00

100.00

VEOLIA MILJØ AS

Box 567 Skoyen

0214 OSLO (Norway)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Umweltservice GmbH (formerly Sulo)

Hammerbrookstrasse 69

20097 Hamburg (Germany)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Marius Pedersen / Veolia Miljøservice Holding A/S Danemark and its subsidiaries

ørbaekvej49-5863 Ferritsllev (Danemark)

 

FC

65.00

65.00

Veolia Servizi Ambientali SpA (and its subsidiaries)

Via di Monte Brianzo,56 – 00186 Roma-(Italy)

 

FC

100.00

100.00


Consolidation method

FC: Full consolidation – PC: Proportionate consolidation – EA: Equity associate





F-135



Back to Contents



Company and address

French company
registration number
(Siret)

Consolidation method

% control

% interest

ENERGY SERVICES

    

Dalkia – Saint-André

37, avenue du Mal de Lattre de Tassigny

59350 St André les Lille

40 321 129 500 023

FC

66.00

66.00

Dalkia France

37, avenue du Mal de Lattre de Tassigny

59350 St André les Lille

45 650 053 700 018

FC

99.93

65.96

Dalkia Investissement

37, avenue du Mal de Lattre de Tassigny

59350 St André les Lille

40 443 498 700 073

PC

50.00

33.00

Dalkia International

37, avenue du Mal de Lattre de Tassigny

59350 St André les Lille

43 353 956 600 011

PC

75.81

50.03

Citelum and its subsidiaries

37, rue de Lyon – 75012 Paris

38 964 385 900 019

FC

100.00

65.96

Proxiserve Holding (and its subsidiaries)

7 Rue Troncon du Coudray – 75008 Paris

403 210 875 00015

FC

100.00

82.98

Including the following foreign companies:

    

Dalkia PLC and its subsidiaries

Elizabeth House – 56-60 London Road

Staines TW18 4BQ (United Kingdom)

 

PC

75.81

50.03

Dalkia NV and its subsidiaries

52, quai Fernand Demets

1070 – Anderlecht (Belgium)

 

PC

75.81

50.03

Siram SPA and its subsidiaries

Via Bisceglie, 95 – 20152 Milan (Italy)

 

PC

75.81

50.03

Dalkia Energia Y Servicios and its subsidiaries

Cl Juan Ignacio Luca De tgna, 4

28 027 Madrid (Spain)

 

PC

75.81

50.03

Dalkia GmbH and its subsidiaries

Carl-Ulrich-Strabe 4 – 63263 Neu Isenburg (Germany)

 

PC

75.81

50.03


Consolidation method

FC: Full consolidation – PC: Proportionate consolidation – EA: Equity associate



F-136



Back to Contents



Company and address

French company registration number
(Siret)

Consolidation method

% control

% interest

ENERGY SERVICES

    

Dalkia SGPS SA and its subsidiaries

Estrada de Paço d’Arcos 2770 – 129 Paco d’Arços (Portugal)

 

PC

75.81

50.03

Dalkia Limitada and its subsidiaries

Rua Funchal 418 – 14 andar, Vila Olimpia

-60 Sao Paulo SP (Brazil)

 

PC

75.81

50.03

Dalkia Polska and its subsidiaries

Ul Mysia 5 – 00 496 Warsaw (Poland)

 

PC

75.81

32.52

Zespol Elektrocieplownl w Lodzi and its subsidiary

Ul.Jadzi. Andrzejewskiej Street 90-975 Lodz (Poland)

 

PC

75.81

16.59

Dalkia AB and its subsidiaries

Hälsingegatan 47 – 113 31 Stockholm (Sweden)

 

PC

75.81

50.03

Tallinna Kute

Punane 36 13619 Tallinn (Estonia)

 

PC

75.81

48.73

UAB Vilnius Energija

Joconiu St. 13 - 02300 VILNIUS (Lithuania)

 

PC

75.81

50.03

Dalkia Energia Zrt. and its subsidiaries

Budafoki út 91-93 – H-1117 Budapest (Hungary)

 

PC

75.81

49.89

Dalkia a.s and its subsidiaries

Kutlíkova 17 – Technopol

851 02 Bratislava 5 (Slovakia)

 

PC

75.81

50.03

Dalkia Ceska Republika and its subsidiaries

28.řijna 3123/ 152

709 74 Ostrava (Czech Republic)

 

PC

75.81

49.06

PRATERM Group and its subsidiaries

UL B.Czecha 36 - 04-555 Warszawa (Poland)

 

PC

75.81

32.52


TRANSPORTATION

    

VEOLIA TRANSPORT

Parc des Fontaines

163 / 169, avenue Georges Clémenceau

92000 Nanterre

383 607 090 00016

FC

100.00

100.00

Société Nationale Maritime Corse-Méditerranée (SNCM)

61, boulevard des Dames – 13002 Marseille

775 558 463 00011

FC

66.00

66.00

C.F.T.I. (Compagnie Française de Transport Interurbain) Parc des Fontaines
163 / 169, avenue Georges Clémenceau

92000 Nanterre

552 022 063 01075

FC

99.94

99.94

VEOLIA TRANSPORT URBAIN

Parc des Fontaines

163 / 169, avenue Georges Clémenceau

92000 Nanterre

344 379 060 00082

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Eurolines and its subsidiaries
163/169, avenue Georges Clémenceau

92000 Nanterre

434 009 254 00021

FC

100.00

100.00


Consolidation method

FC: Full consolidation – PC: Proportionate consolidation – EA: Equity associate




F-137



Back to Contents



Company and address

French company registration number
(Siret)

Consolidation method

% control

% interest

TRANSPORTATION

    

Including the following foreign companies:

    

VEOLIA TRANSPORTATION Inc. and its subsidiaries

8757 Georgia Avenue – Suite 1300 – Silver Pring MD 20910 Baltimore (United States)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Super Shuttle International Inc, and its subsidiaries

14500 N. Northsight boulevard, Suite 329

Scottsdale, AZ 85260 (United States)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

VEOLIA TRANSPORT AUSTRALASIA Pty Ltd and its subsidiaries - Level 24, 1 Spring Street

Melbourne, Victoria 3000 (Australia)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Transport Northern Europe AB and its subsidiaries

Englundavägen 9, Box 1820

SE-171 24 Solna (Sweden)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

VEOLIA TRANSPORT NORD AS

Havnegata 3, Postboks 308

9615 Hammerfest (Norway)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Transport Sverige AB and its subsidiaries

Englundavägen 9, Box 1820

SE-171 24 Solna (Sweden)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

People Travel Group AB

72 Klarabergsviadukten

11 164 Stockholm (Sweden)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Transport Norge AS

Klubbgaten 1 – N 4013 – Stavanger (Norway)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

VEOLIA TRANSPORT UK LTD and its subsidiaries

37-41 Old Queen Street

London SW 1H 9JA, (United Kingdom)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Transport Nederland Holding BV and its subsidiaries

Mastbosstraat 12 - Postbus 3306

4813 GT Breda (Netherlands)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Transport Belgium nv and its subsidiaries

Groenendaallaan 387

2030 Antwerpen (Belgium)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Transport Central Europe GmbH and its subsidiaries

Georgenstrasse 22

10117 Berlin (Germany)

 

FC

100.00

65.00

Veolia Verkehr GmbH and its subsidiaries

Georgenstrasse 22

10117 Berlin (Germany)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Transport Ceska Republica a.s.

K Hutim 664/7

198 00 Praha 9 (Czech Republic)

 

FC

100.00

65.00


Consolidation method

FC: Full consolidation – PC: Proportionate consolidation – EA: Equity associate




F-138



Back to Contents


NOTE 44

Audit fees

Audit fees incurred by the Group during fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007 total €50.2 million, €51.7 million and €52.2 million respectively, including €40.2 million in 2009, €40.3 million in 2008 and €37.6 million in 2007 in respect of the statutory audit of the accounts and €10.0 million in 2009, €11.4 million in 2008 and €14.6 million in 2007 in respect of services falling within the scope of diligences directly related to the audit engagement.



F-139



Back to Contents



Transportation

In Germany, Connex implemented a new restructuring plan in 2004 in connection with the reorganization by region and moving out of the headquarters. This plan amounts to €2.7 million, consisting in termination costs of 100 employees, of whom 6 were executives. The reserve utilized in 2005 amounted to 1.3 million.

The reorganization of the Swedish activities led to an additional provision of €1.2 million in 2005, of which €0.3 million were already utilized.

In 2006, further to the acquisition of SNCM, Veolia Transportation implemented à restructuring plan for €52.1 million recognized in column "Change in Scope" covering the termination costs for 400 employees.


51.7

Stock based compensation


Veolia Environnement stock option plans

Under US GAAP, the Group accounts for stock-based compensation based upon the provisions of APB Opinion  25 to prior periods and from January 1, 2006 SFAS123 (R) for new plans since the Group elected the modified-prospective-transition method under SFAS 123 (R). SFAS123 (R) eliminates the alternative to use opinion 25’s intrinsic value method of accounting for share-based payments.  The statement applies to new awards and to those awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled after January 1, 2006, and the remaining portion of the requisite service under previously-granted unvested awards outstanding as of that date.  Pro forma information, as if Veolia Environnement applied SFAS 123, is presented in note 51J.  Under IFRS, compensation expense has been recorded based upon the fair value measured at the grant date. In accordance with the transitional provisions of IFRS 2 an expense has only been recorded for those plans granted after November 7, 2002 and for which the rights had not vested as of January 1, 2005.  

The compensation expense recorded by the Group under IFRS was €16.7 million, €16.2 million and €6.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 respectively.  Under US GAAP, the expense recorded by the Group was €38.1 million, €3.2 million and €0.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 respectively.

Employee Stock Purchase Plans

Under IFRS, in accordance with the transitional provisions of IFRS2, no compensation expense has been recorded for Employee Stock Purchase Plans granted in 2004 because the awards were fully vested as of January 1, 2005. The compensation cost recorded by the Group for the year ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 was €24.3 million and €14.1 million.

Under US GAAP, the compensation costs recorded by the Group for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 were € 31,1 million, €14.1 million and €10.3 million respectively, applying the intrinsic value method method (in 2005 and 2004).

51.8

Pension plan and other post retirement benefits other than pension plans


Under IFRS the Group uses the proportionate consolidation method for subsidiaries over which the Group and other shareholders have agreed to exercise joint control over significant financial and operating policies.  Under US GAAP those subsidiaries which have been consolidated using the proportionate consolidation method under IFRS are accounted for using the equity method.  Prior to the transition to SFAS 158 on December 31, 2006 the principal difference between IFRS and US GAAP was that the Group had decided to recognize directly in equity actuarial gains and losses in the period in which they occur under IFRS while under US GAAP such gains and losses continued to be amortized through income statement using the corridor method.


The disclosures below show the benefit obligations, assets, funded status and balance sheet impact, as well as net periodic expense and assumptions associated with the defined benefit pension plans and other post-employment benefit plans as computed in accordance with FAS 87 and FAS 106.


Disclosures presented in accordance with SFAS 132, are as follows (in millions of euros):





Back to contents






 

Pension Benefits

 

Other Benefits

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

Change in benefit obligation

           

Benefit obligation at beginning of year


1 099.3

 

852.3

 

715.0

 

22.3

 

24.0

 

0.0

Service cost


42.9

 

37.9

 

47.6

 

1.4

 

0.4

 

0.4

Interest cost


52.9

 

43.6

 

38.6

 

1.9

 

1.2

 

1.5

Plan participants contributions


4.5

 

5.2

 

3.4

 

-

 

-

 

-

Acquisitions

321.2

 

14.3

 

0.6

 

25.1

 

-

 

-

Disposals


(0.9)

 

(0.8)

 

(35.1)

 

-

 

-

 

-

Curtailments & settlements


(9.2)

 

(9.5)

 

(4.7)

 

-

 

(3.1)

 

-

Actuarial loss (gain)


(16.4)

 

181.2

 

31.0

 

1.2

 

-

 

-

Benefits paid


(53.5)

 

(54.2)

 

(38.0)

 

(2.0)

 

(1.5)

 

(1.9)

Plan amendments


16.8

 

4.7

 

12.8

 

-

 

-

 

8.0

Others (including business combinations and foreign currency translation)


1.1

 

24.6

 

81.1

 

0.3

 

3.1

 

16.0

Benefit obligation at end of year


1 458.7

 

1 099.3

 

852.3

 

50.2

 

22.3

 

24.0

            

Change in plan assets

           

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year


662.6

 

539.3

 

483.3

 

0.0

 

0.0

 

0.0

Actual return on plan assets


62.4

 

80.1

 

49.8

 

-

 

-

 

-

Group contributions


44.4

 

54.5

 

22.3

 

-

 

-

 

-

Plan participant contributions


4.9

 

5.2

 

3.4

 

-

 

-

 

-

Acquisitions

243.1

 

0.1

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

Disposals


(0.1)

 

-

 

(27.5)

 

-

 

-

 

-

Curtailments & settlements


-

 

(3.6)

 

(0.3)

 

-

 

-

 

-

Benefits paid


(38.2)

 

(34.1)

 

(23.8)

 

-

 

-

 

-

Others (including business combinations and foreign currency translation)


9.4

 

21.1

 

32.1

 

-

 

-

 

-

Fair value of plan assets at end of year


988.5

 

662.6

 

539.3

 

0.0

 

0.0

 

0.0


The Group’s postretirement benefit plan weighted-average asset allocation at December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 by asset category are as follows:


 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

Equity securities

51%

 

48%

 

42%

Debt securities

39%

 

36%

 

37%

Insurance contracts

10%

 

11%

 

14%

Cash

0%

 

5%

 

6%



 

Pension Benefits

 

Other Benefits

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

Funded status of plan


(470.2)

 

(436.7)

 

(313.0)

 

(50.2)

 

(22.3)

 

(24.0)

Unrecognized actuarial loss


-

 

296.0

 

172.2

 

-

 

1.9

 

5.8

Unrecognized actuarial prior service costs


-

 

35.4

 

36.3

 

-

 

7.7

 

7.6

Others


-

 

(74.0)

 

(37.4)

 

-

 

-

 

(13.4)

Accrued benefit cost


(470.2)

 

(179.3)

 

(141.8)

 

(50.2)

 

(12.8)

 

(24.0)





Back to contents



Items not yet recognized as a component of net periodic pension costs:


 

Pension Benefits

 

Other Benefits

 

2006

 

2006

Actuarial loss


246.2

 

3.2

Prior service costs


46.3

 

7.0

The Group expects to recognize as a component of its net periodic pension costs in 2007, €3.8 million from the amortization of prior service costs and €11.3 million from the amortization of its actuarial losses.

Prepaid arising from multi-employer plans overtime (activities under lease contract) are written off since there are serious doubts that they could be recoverable through future contribution holidays.

The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for those pension plans with accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets were €734.7 million, €609.9 million and €331.1 million as of December 31, 2006, €664.0 million, €531.5 million and €251.2 million as of December 31, 2005, €458.9 million, €377.5 million and €157.0 million as of December 31, 2004.

The allocation of the projected benefit obligation €1 458.7 million and the accumulated benefit obligation €1 193.4 million by area are as follows at the end of 2006 : €990.4 million and €829.9 million in the United Kingdom, €346.3 million and €271.2 million in France and €122.0 and €92.3 million in other countries.

The fair value of plan assets in France amounted to €86.9 million at the end of 2006.  Veolia Environnement domestic plans assets are invested principally in insurance companies funds. The expected long-term rates of return on these assets are directly based on historical returns. Contributions paid to these plan assets are essentially discretionary contributions without contractual or legal requirements. The accumulated benefit obligation for domestic plans was €271.2 million as of December 31, 2006.

The fair value of plan assets in the United Kingdom amounted to €874.4 million at the end of 2006.  These assets are invested essentially in equities and bonds through a trustee structure.  The expected long-term rates of return on these assets are based on statistical returns of the observed market performance over a long-term basis.  The accumulated benefit obligation for these plans was €829.9 million at the end of 2006.


Amounts recognized in the balance sheets consist of (in millions of euros):


 

Pension Benefits

 

Other Benefits

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

Accrued benefit liability (including MLA)


(478.9)

 

(319.0)

 

(267.9)

 

(50.2)

 

(12.8)

 

(24.0)

Prepaid benefit cost


8.7

 

139.7

 

126.1

 

-

 

-

 

-

Net amount accrued for under U.S. GAAP


(470.2)

 

(179.3)

 

(141.8)

 

(50.2)

 

(12.8)

 

(24.0)

Intangible assets (MLA)(a)


-

 

21.4

 

16.3

 

-

 

-

 

7.6

Net amount recognized under U.S. GAAP


(470.2)

 

(157.9)

 

(125.5)

 

(50.2)

 

(12.8)

 

(16.4)


(a)

Prior to the introduction of SFAS 158 the benefit liability accrued under U.S. GAAP was the greater of either the excess of the accumulated benefit obligation over the fair value of plan assets or the net amount recognized under U.S. GAAP.


Net accruals in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet can be compared with balances determined under U.S. GAAP as follows


(in millions of euros)

Pension Benefits

 

Other Benefits

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

Net amount accrued for under U.S. GAAP


(470.2)

 

(179.3)

 

(141.8)

 

(50.2)

 

(12.8)

 

(24.0)

Changes in scope


(145.0)

 

(104.9)

 

(73.0)

 

(3.6)

 

(3.6)

 

(2.6)

Minimum liability adjustments (MLA)


-

 

74.0

 

37.4

 

-

 

-

 

-

Recognition of actuarial gains and losses through shareholders’ equity

-

 

(346.8)

 

(175.3)

 

-

 

(1.0)

 

9.7

Unrecognized prior service costs

50.3

 

-

 

-

 

7.0

 

-

 

-

Asset ceiling (IAS 19)

(5.3)

 

(2.8)

 

(2.0)

 

-

 

-

 

-

Net amount accrued for under IFRS

(570.2)

 

(559.8)

 

(354.7)

 

(46.8)

 

(17.4)

 

(16.9)





Back to contents



Net periodic cost under U.S. GAAP was as follows (in millions of euros):


 

Pension Benefits

 

Other Benefits

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

Service cost


42.9

 

37.9

 

47.6

 

1.4

 

0.4

 

0.4

Expected interest cost


52.9

 

43.6

 

38.6

 

1.9

 

1.2

 

1.5

Expected return on plan assets


(43.8)

 

(35.5)

 

(33.9)

 

-

 

-

 

-

Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost


3.8

 

2.5

 

0.9

 

0.5

 

0.5

 

0.2

Amortization of actuarial net loss (gain)


17.8

 

11.1

 

7.9

 

0.0

 

0.2

 

0.6

Amortization of net transition obligation


-

 

-

 

(6.4)

 

-

 

-

 

-

Curtailments/Settlements


(9.7)

 

(4.4)

 

(0.9)

 

0.0

 

-

 

(6.8)

Others


(1.2)

 

2.6

 

(3.5)

 

0.0

 

-

 

-

Net periodic benefit cost under U.S. GAAP


62.7

 

57.8

 

50.3

 

3.8

 

2.2

 

(4.1)


The Group expects to contribute €38.3 million to its pension and postretirement benefit plans in 2007.


 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

 

2010

 

2011

 

2012-6

Expected future benefit payments

55.6

 

47.2

 

54.6

 

58.5

 

61.9

 

370.0


Actuarial assumptions – US GAAP


The following are weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations at December 31, 2006,

December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004:


 

Pension Benefits

 

Other Benefits

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

Discount rate


4.8%

 

4.5%

 

5.0%

 

5.0%

 

5.8%

 

5.6%

Rate of compensation increase

3.7%

 

3.3%

 

3.8%

 

-

 

-

 

-


The following are weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit costs for the years ended December 31, 2006, December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 :


 

Pension Benefits

 

Other Benefits

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

 

2006

 

2005

 

2004

Discount rate


4.5%

 

5.0%

 

5.4%

 

5.8%

 

5.8%

 

5.6%

Expected return on plan assets


6.3%

 

6.4%

 

6.6%

 

-

 

-

 

-

Rate of compensation increase

3.3%

 

3.8%

 

3.8%

 

-

 

-

 

-

Expected residual active life (in years)


13.4

 

14.8

 

15.0

 

13.6

 

9.0

 

12.4


As regards health insurance plans, an increase of one percent in health expenses would not have any significant impact.


51.9

Goodwill and other intangible assets


The goodwill under US GAAP amounts to € 3,419 million in 2004, € 3,817 million in 2005 and € 4,757 million in 2006.


The indefinite-lived assets under US GAAP amount to € 90 million in 2004, € 89 million in 2005 and € 79 million in 2006.


The definite-lived assets under US GAAP amount to € 927 million in 2004, € 1,252 million in 2005, € 1,400 million in 2006.


The impairments under US GAAP amount to € 74 million in 2004, € 23 million in 2005, € 8 million in 2006.





Back to contents



51.10

Pro-forma information


a)

Veolia Environnement stock option plans

Veolia Environnement applies the intrinsic value method to account for compensation cost associated with options granted to employees before January 1, 2006 (see Note 51.G).

The average fair value of Veolia Environnement options granted in 2004, 2003 and 2002 was €6.56, €5.09 and €15.3 respectively, using the Binomial option pricing model with the following assumptions for the grants:


Veolia Environnement

2004

 

2003

 

2002

Expected life (in years)

7.5

 

7.23

 

7.50

Interest rate

3.40%

 

3.90%

 

4.33%

Volatility

21.45%

 

22.67%

 

30.00%

Dividend yield

2.1%

 

1.00%

 

1.00%


Pro forma net income and basic earnings per share are presented below, as if compensation cost for stock options awarded under these plans had been determined based on the fair value at the dates of grant.


b)

Pro forma net income and basic earnings per share


Veolia Environnement’s pro forma net income and basic earnings per share are calculated as follows (in millions of euros, except per share data):


(€ million)

At December 31,

  

2005 adjusted

 

2004 adjusted

Net income (loss) under US GAAP as reported


 

555.7

 

145.2

 

Add back: total stock based-employee compensation expense determined under APB25 for all awards net of related tax effects


 

1.9

 

0.3

 

Deduct: total stock based-employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects


 

(14.8)

 

(17.0)

 

Deduct: net income of discontinued operations


 

-0.7

 

236.9

Pro forma net income (loss)


 

542.1

 

365.4

Net income (loss) basic earning per share


 

1.42

 

0.37

Net income (loss) diluted earning per share


 

1.42

 

0.37

Net income (loss) pro forma per share


 

1.39

 

0.92

Net income (loss) pro forma diluted per share


 

1.38

 

0.92


51.11

Subsequent events


On April 27, 2007, Veolia Environnement announced the signature of an agreement with The Blackstone Group and Apax Partners with a view to acquiring 100% of Sulo, the German number 2 in waste management, for an enterprise value of €1,450 million (including financial debt).  The closing of the transaction is expected to occur on July 2, 2007.  

On May 31, 2007, Veolia Propreté announced the signature of an agreement for a controlling interest in TMT, the waste management and treatment subsidiary of Termomeccanica Ecologia in Italy. The transaction concerns 75% of the shares based on an enterprise value (100%) of €338 million, including €250 million of operating financial assets at the acquisition date. The stake may be raised to 100% by 2012. Finalization of the transaction, which is currently expected by September 2007, is subject to the completion of the last acquisition audits and the approval of the relevant antitrust authorities.  

On June 12, 2007, we announced the launch of a €2.6 billion rights offering. The offering was made through the distribution of preferential subscription rights to all shareholders, giving shareholders the right to subscribe to a total of 51,918,579 new shares (assuming certain outstanding share subscription options granted by us to our employees are not exercised, or up to 52,741,899 new shares if all such options are exercised).  See “Item 8. Financial Information—Significant Changes.”

In June 2007, Veolia Environnement announced the acquisition of Thermal North America, a major operator on the market of heating and cooling networks in the United States, for an enterprise value of US$788 million.  This transaction remains subject to regulatory approvals, which we hope to obtain at the end of 2007 or beginning of 2008.





Back to contents



SIGNATURES


The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.


 

VEOLIA ENVIRONNEMENT S.A.

   
   
 

By:

/s/ Jérôme ContamineAntoine Frérot


 

Name:

Name: Jérôme ContamineAntoine Frérot

 

Title:

Title:

SeniorChief Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date: June 29, 2007







Back to contents


April 19, 2010






F-140