As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 7, 2008April 19, 2010


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 20-F


 REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009

OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007

OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


Commission File Number: 001-15248

VEOLIA ENVIRONNEMENT

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

N/A
(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)

36/38, avenue Kléber,
75116 Paris,
France

Republic of France
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

(Address of principal executive offices)

Alain Tchernonog,

Olivier Orsini, Secretary General, Secretary, 36/38 avenue Kléber, 75116 Paris France 011 33 1 71 75 00 5401 26

(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)


Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of each class

Name of each exchange on which registered

————

————

Ordinary shares, nominal value €5 per share represented by American Depositary Shares
(as evidenced by American Depositary Receipts),
each American Depositary Share representing one ordinary share*

The New York Stock Exchange


Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
None

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:

470,719,806493,630,374 ordinary shares, nominal value €5 per share

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act:

Yes

No

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:

Yes

No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:

Yes

No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

U.S. GAAP    International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board    Other

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

Item 17

Item 18

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act):

Yes

No

*Listed, not for trading or quotation purposes, but only in connection with the registration of the American Depositary Shares pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission.







Back to Contents


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

We make some forward-looking statements in this document. When we use the words “aim(s),” “expect(s),” “feel(s),” “will,” “may,” “believe(s),” “anticipate(s)” and similar expressions in this document, we are intending to identify those statements as forward-looking. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this document. In particular, from time to time in this document we state our expectations in terms of revenue to be generated under new contracts recently won or awarded or from new investments made and new assets or operations acquired, though we may have not yet commenced operations under these new contractscontra cts nor begun operating these new assets and operations at the time we make these statements. Some of these revenue estimates are based on our management’s current assumptions regarding future sales volumes and prices, which are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that may cause actual sales volumes and prices to differ materially from those projected. As a result, actual revenue recorded under these new contracts or from these new investments, assets and operations may differ materially from those set forth in this document. Other than in connection with applicable securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publish revised forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this document or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. We urge you to carefully review and consider the various disclosures we make concerning the factors that may affect our business, including the disclosures made in “Item 3. Key Information — Information—Risk Factors,” “Item 7;Item 5. Op eratingOperating and Financial Review and Prospects,” “Item 8. Financial Information Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information – Significant Changes” and “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”

Unless otherwise indicated, information and statistics presented herein regarding market trends and our market share relative to our competitors are based on our own research and various publicly available sources.




i



Back to Contents


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers

1

Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable

1

Item 3. Key Information

1

Item 4. Information on the Company

10

Item 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments

65

Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

66

Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees

100

Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions

136

Item 8. Financial Information

139

Item 9. The Offer and Listing

145

Item 10. Additional Information

148

Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

163

Item 12. Description of Securities Other Than Equity Securities

163

Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies

164

Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds

164

Item 15. Controls and Procedures

164

Item 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert

165

Item 16B. Code of Ethics

165

Item 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

165

Item 16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees

166

Item 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

166

Item 17. Financial Statements

167

Item 18. Financial Statements

167

Item 19. Exhibits

167



ITEM 1.

IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

1

ITEM 2.

OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

1

ITEM 3.

KEY INFORMATION SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

1

ITEM 4.

INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

11

ITEM 4A.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

69

ITEM 5.

OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

70

ITEM 6

DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT

121

ITEM 7.

MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

167

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL INFORMATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION

170

ITEM 9.

THE OFFER AND LISTING TRADING MARKETS

178

ITEM 10.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

181

ITEM 11.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

197

ITEM 12.

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

197

ITEM 12D.

AMERICAN DEPOSITARY SHARES

197

ITEM 13.

DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES

199

ITEM 14.

MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS

199

ITEM 15.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

199

ITEM 16A.

AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

200

ITEM 16B.

CODE OF ETHICS

200

ITEM 16C.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

200

ITEM 16D.

EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES

201

ITEM 16E.

PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

201

ITEM 16F.

CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT

202

ITEM 16G.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

202

ITEM 17.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

204

ITEM 18.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

204

ITEM 19.

EXHIBITS

204



ii



Back to Contents


PART I

ITEM 1.

IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS

Not Applicable.

ITEM 2.

OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

Not Applicable.

ITEM 3.

KEY INFORMATION

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

You should read the following selected financial data together with “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” and our consolidated financial statements. Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) and with IFRS as adopted by the European Union.  We did not publish financial data in accordance with IFRS in 2003, because at the time our financial statements were required to be presented in conformity with French Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. For this reason, we have not provided selected financial data for 2003. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” for a discussion of accounting changes, business combinations and dispositions of business operations that affect the comp arabilitycomparability of the information provided below.



1



Back to Contents



At and for the year ended December 31,

At and for the year ended December 31,

    

(in US$)(1)

(in €)

(in US$)(1)

 

(in €)

 

————

————

————

————

————

————

(millions, except per share amounts)

2007

2006

2005

2004

(millions, except per share amounts) (5)

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

————

————

————

————

————

————

INCOME STATEMENT DATA:

      

Revenue

48,032.1

32,628.2

28,620.4

25,570.4

22,792.4

49,774.2

34,551.0

35,764.8

31,574.1

27,653.1

24,684.9

Operating income

3,675.7

2,496.9

2,132.9

1,892.9

1,489.6

2,910.2

2,020.1

1,960.8

2,461.1

2,108.4

1,867.7

Net income from continuing operations

1,881.3

1,278.0

994.3

794.4

640.0

1,274.5

884.7

570.0

1,273.9

985.1

801.4

Net income (expense) from discontinued operations

(34.2)

(23.2)

0.6

0.7

(38.1)

(61.7)

(42.8)

139.2

(19.1)

9.8

(6.3)

Minority interest

481.2

326.9

236.2

172.9

212.1

371.4

257.8

304.1

326.9

236.2

172.9

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent

1,366.0

927.9

758.7

622.2

389.8

841.5

584.1

405.1

927.9

758.7

622.2

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent per share — Basic(2)

3.18

2.16

1.90

1.57

0.97

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent per share — Diluted(3)

3.14

2.13

1.89

1.56

0.97

Group net income from continuing operations per share — Basic(2)

3.25

2.21

1.90

1.57

1.26

Group net income from continuing operations per share — Diluted(3)

3.22

2.19

1.88

1.56

1.26

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent per share—Basic(2)

1.79

1.24

0.88

2.13

1.88

1.55

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent per share—Diluted(3)

1.79

1.24

0.87

2.11

1.86

1.55

Net income from continuing operations attributable to equity holders of the parent per share—Basic(2)

1.92

1.33

0.71

2.19

1.87

1.58

Net income from continuing operations attributable to equity holders of the parent per share—Diluted(3)

1.92

1.33

0.71

2.17

1.85

1.57

Dividends per share

1.78

1.21(4)

1.05

0,85

0,68

1.74

1.21(4)

1.21

1.05

0.85

Number of shares (adjusted to reflect changes in capital)

471,762,756

412,626,550(5)

407,872,606

406,421,983

493,630,374

472,576,666

471,762,756

412,626,550

407,872,606

      

BALANCE SHEET DATA (AT PERIOD END):

      

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

11,207.0

7,612.9

4,360.8

3,790.2

3,211.2

10,747.7

7,460.6

7,001.2

7,612.9

4,360.8

3,790.2

Minority interest

3,794.8

2,577.8

2,192.6

1,888.0

1,728.7

Minority interests

3,846.5

2,670.1

2,530.5

2,577.8

2,192.6

1,888.0

Total assets

68,168.6

46,306.9

40,123.7

36,381.0

35,899.3

71,765.9

49,816.7

49,126.1

46,306.9

40,123.7

36,381.0

Total non-current assets

42,647.4

28,970.4

25,100.0

22,834.9

20,733.3

42,634.6

29,595.0

30,041.8

28,970.4

25,100.0

22,834.9

Total non-current liabilities

26,564.7

18,045.4

18,056.3

16,934.0

14,836.4

31,734.8

22,028.9

21,320.0

18,045.4

18,056.3

16,934.0

      

CASH FLOW DATA:

      

Net cash flow from operating activities

5,350.5

3,634.6

3,389.6

3,163.7

3,384.3

5,707.9

3,962.2

3,750.0

3,634.6

3,389.6

3,163.7

Net cash from (used in) investing activities

(5,915.5)

(4,018.4)

(2,904.0)

(2,407.6)

318.9

(2,394.1)

(1,661.9)

(3,335.1)

(4,018.4)

(2,904.0)

(2,407.6)

Net cash from (used in) financing activities

1,385.0

940.8

(71.5)

(3,152.8)

(1,795.5)

Net cash used in financing activities

(776.9)

(539.3)

289.6

940.8

(71.5)

(3,152.8)

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

(3,707.8)

(2,518.7)

(2,017.6)

(1,837.1)

(1,723.0)

(3,552.1)

(2,465.7)

(2,780.6)

(2,518.7)

(2,017.6)

(1,837.1)

    

(1)

For your convenience, we have converted the euro amounts of our selected financial data into U.S. dollars using the December 31, 2007 rate of $1.00 = €0.6793. This does not mean that we actually converted, or could have converted, those amounts into U.S. dollars on this or any other date.

(2)

Based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding in each period for the calculation of basic earnings per share, equal to 430.0 million shares in 2007, 398.8 million shares in 2006, 395.6 million shares in 2005 and 401.5 million shares in 2004. Following the share capital increase in July 2007, the calculation of basic diluted earnings per share was adjusted retrospectively for all periods presented.

(3)

Based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding in each period for the calculation of diluted earnings per share, equal to 435.0 million shares in 2007, 402.4 million shares in 2006, 397,6 million shares in 2005 and 401.6 million shares in 2004. Following the share capital increase in July 2007, the calculation of diluted earnings per share was adjusted retrospectively for all periods presented.

(4)

Amount of dividend distribution per share to be proposed to the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting of May 7, 2008.

(5)

The number of shares as of December 31, 2006 mentioned above includes the exercise of options to subscribe for shares of our company which occurred from July 1 to December 31, 2006. The share capital increase and the creation of shares resulting from such exercise of stock options were formally recorded by our board of directors on March 7, 2007.

(1)

For your convenience, we have converted the euro amounts of our selected financial data into U.S. dollars using the December 31, 2009 rate of $1.00 = €0.69415. This does not mean that we actually converted, or could have converted, those amounts into U.S. dollars on this or any other date.

(2)

Pursuant to IAS 33, the weighted average number of shares outstanding taken into account for the calculation of 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005 net income per share was adjusted following the distribution of a share dividend in June 2009 (cf. Note 26 of our Consolidated Financial Statements). Based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding in each period for the calculation of basic earnings per share, equal to 471.7 million shares in 2009, 462.2 million shares in 2008, and 434.8 million shares in 2007, 403.6 million shares in 2006, and 400.4 million shares in 2005.

(3)

Pursuant to IAS 33, the weighted average number of shares outstanding taken into account for the calculation of 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005 net income per share was adjusted following the distribution of a share dividend in June 2009 (cf Note 26 of our Consolidated Financial Statements). Based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding in each period for the calculation of diluted earnings per share equal to 471.7 million shares in 2009, 464.0 million shares in 2008 and 439.8 million shares in 2007, 407.2 million shares in 2006, and 402.4 million shares in 2005.

(4)

Amount of dividend distribution per share to be proposed to the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting of May 7, 2010.

(5)

In accordance with IFRS 5, Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations, the results of operations of:

• the Clemessy and Crystal entities in the Energy Services Division, divested in December 2008;

• the entities of the U.S. waste-to-energy activity in Environmental Services (Montenay International) and Freight activities (essentially in France, Germany and the Netherlands) divested in the second half of 2009;

• Transportation activities in the United Kingdom and renewable energy activities in the process of divestiture at the year end 2009, are presented in a separate line, “Net income from discontinued operations,” for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005.

(1)

For your convenience, we have converted the euro amounts of our selected financial data into U.S. dollars using the December 31, 2009 rate of $1.00 = €0.69415. This does not mean that we actually converted, or could have converted, those amounts into U.S. dollars on this or any other date.

(2)

Pursuant to IAS 33, the weighted average number of shares outstanding taken into account for the calculation of 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005 net income per share was adjusted following the distribution of a share dividend in June 2009 (cf. Note 26 of our Consolidated Financial Statements). Based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding in each period for the calculation of basic earnings per share, equal to 471.7 million shares in 2009, 462.2 million shares in 2008, and 434.8 million shares in 2007, 403.6 million shares in 2006, and 400.4 million shares in 2005.

(3)

Pursuant to IAS 33, the weighted average number of shares outstanding taken into account for the calculation of 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005 net income per share was adjusted following the distribution of a share dividend in June 2009 (cf Note 26 of our Consolidated Financial Statements). Based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding in each period for the calculation of diluted earnings per share equal to 471.7 million shares in 2009, 464.0 million shares in 2008 and 439.8 million shares in 2007, 407.2 million shares in 2006, and 402.4 million shares in 2005.

(4)

Amount of dividend distribution per share to be proposed to the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting of May 7, 2010.

(5)

In accordance with IFRS 5, Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations, the results of operations of:

• the Clemessy and Crystal entities in the Energy Services Division, divested in December 2008;

• the entities of the U.S. waste-to-energy activity in Environmental Services (Montenay International) and Freight activities (essentially in France, Germany and the Netherlands) divested in the second half of 2009;

• Transportation activities in the United Kingdom and renewable energy activities in the process of divestiture at the year end 2009, are presented in a separate line, “Net income from discontinued operations,” for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005.




2



Back to Contents


Dividends

Under French law and our articles of association (statuts), our statutory net income in each fiscal year, as increased or reduced, as the case may be, by any profits or losses carried forward from prior years, less any contributions to legal reserves, is available for distribution to our shareholders as dividends, subject to other applicable requirements of French law and ourstatuts.

At our general shareholders’ meeting on May 7, 2008,2010, our shareholders will decide on a dividend payment proposed to be €1.21 per share in respect of our 20072009 fiscal year, which shallwill be paid beginning on June 9, 2010. The dividend will be payable in cash or in shares, and the period during which shareholders may choose the option of the payment of the dividend in cash or in shares, subject to applicable legal restrictions, will begin on May 14, 2010 and end on May 31, 2010. Subject to the approval of the general shareholders’ meeting, new shares will be issued with a discount of 10% off the average opening price on Euronext Paris of the shares over the twenty trading days prior to the day of the general shareholders’ meeting approving the dividend, less the amount of the dividend. We expect that Bank of New York Mellon as depositary will make this option availabl e to ADR holders. On June 8, 2009, we paid a dividend of €1.21 per share in respect of our 2008 fiscal year. On May 27, 2008.2008, we paid a dividend of €1.21 per share in respect of our 2007 fiscal year. On May 15, 2007, we paid a dividend of €1.05 per share in respect of the 2006 fiscal year. On May 29, 2006, we paid a dividend of €0.85 per share in respect of the 2005 fiscal year. On May 27, 2005, we paid a dividend of €0.68 per share in respect of the 2004 fiscal year. On May 28, 2004, we paid a dividend of €0.55 per share in respect of the 2003 fiscal year. On May 7, 2003, we paid a dividend of €0.55 per share in respect of the 2002 fiscal year.  

Dividends paid to holders of our ADSs and non-French resident holders of our shares normally are subject to a 25% French withholding tax. However, non-resident holders that are entitled to and comply with the procedures for claiming benefits under an applicable tax treaty may be subject to a reduced rate of withholding tax (15% for holders who are residents of the United States) and be entitled to certain benefits. See “Item 10. Additional Information—Taxation” for a summary of the material U.S. federal and French tax consequences to holders of shares and ADSs. Holders of shares or ADSs should consult their own tax advisers with respect to the tax consequences of an investment in the shares or ADSs. In addition, dividends paid to holders of ADSs will be subject to a charge by the depositary for any expenses incurred by the depositary of the ADSs in the conversion of eur oe uro to dollars.

Exchange Rate Information

Share capital in our companyCompany is represented by ordinary shares with a nominal value of €5 per share (generally referred to as “our shares”). Our shares are denominated in euro. Because we intend to pay cash dividends denominated in euro, exchange rate fluctuations will affect the U.S. dollar amounts that shareholders will receive on conversion of dividends from euro to dollars.

The following table shows the euro/U.S. dollar exchange rate from 20032005 through April 20082010 based on the noon buying rate expressed in U.S. dollars per euro. The information concerning the U.S. dollar exchange rate is based on the noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in foreign currencies as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the “Noon Buying Rate”). We provide the exchange rates below solely for your convenience. We do not represent that euros were, could have been, or could be, converted into U.S. dollars at these rates or at any other rate. For information regarding the effect of currency fluctuations on our results of operations, see “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.”

Month

Period

Average

  

U.S. dollar/Euro

End

rate*

High

Low

 

————

————

————

————

April 2008

1.56

1.57

1.60

1.56

March 2008

1.58

1.55

1.58

1.52

February 2008

1.52

1.48

1.52

1.45

January 2008

1.49

1.47

1.49

1.46

December 2007

1.47

1.46

1.48

1.43

November 2007

1.48

1.47

1.49

1.44

     

Year

    

U.S. dollar/Euro

    
     

2007

1.47

1.38

1.49

1.29

2006

1.32

1.26

1.33

1.19

2005

1.18

1.24

1.35

1.17

2004

1.36

1.25

1.36

1.18

2003

1.26

1.13

1.26

1.04

*

The average of the Noon Buying Rates on the last business day of each month (or portion thereof) during the relevant period for year average; on each business day of the month (or portion thereof) for monthly average.




3



Back to Contents



Month

Period

Average

  

U.S. dollar/Euro

End

rate*

High

Low

April 2009 (through April 9th, 2010)

1.35

1.34

1.36

1.33

March 2010

1.35

1.36

1.38

1.33

February 2010

1.37

1.37

1.40

1.34

January 2010

1.39

1.42

1.45

1.39

December 2009

1.43

1.45

1.51

1.42

November 2009

1.49

1.49

1.50

1.46

October 2009

1.47

1.48

1.50

1.45

     

Year

    

U.S. dollar/Euro

    
     

2009

1.43

1.39

1.51

1.25

2008

1.39

1.47

1.60

1.24

2007

1.47

1.38

1.49

1.29

2006

1.32

1.26

1.33

1.19

2005

1.18

1.24

1.35

1.17

*

The average of the Noon Buying Rates on the last business day of each month (or portion thereof) during the relevant period for year average; on each business day of the month (or portion thereof) for monthly average.


Solely for the convenience of the reader, this annual report contains translations of certain euro amounts into U.S. dollars. These translations should not be construed as representations that the converted amounts actually represent such U.S. dollar amounts or could have been or will be converted into U.S. dollars at the rate indicated or at all. The translations from euro to U.S. dollars in this annual report are based on $1.00 = €0.6793,€0.69415, the Noon Buying Rate on December 31, 2007.2009. On May 6, 2008,April 9th, 2010, the Noon Buying Rateexchange rate as published by Bloomberg at approximately 1:00 p.m. (New York time) was U.S.$ 1.551.3468 per one euro.



4



Back to Contents


RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider the risk factors described below in addition to the other information presented in this document.

Risks Relating to Our Operations

We may suffer reduced profits or losses as a result of intense competition.

Our business is highly competitive and requires substantial human and capital resources. resources and cutting-edge technical expertise in numerous areas.

Large international competitors and local niche companies serve each of the markets in which we compete. Accordingly, we must make constant efforts to remain competitive and convince potential clientscustomers of the quality and cost value of our service offerings. CompetitorsWe may also introduceneed to develop new technology ortechnologies and services that we would have to match in order to remainmaintain or increase our competitive position, which could result in significant development costs.

In addition, weWe perform a substantial portion of our business under contracts, often of a long-term nature, with governmentalpublic authorities and clients from the industrial and commercial service sectors.sector customers. These contracts are often awarded through competitive bidding, at the end of which we may not be retained even though we may have incurred significant expenses in order to prepare the bid.

OverIn connection with the courseperformance of performing certain contracts, we may also be requested by our public or private clientscustomers to modify the contractual terms and conditions, regardless of these contracts, whether called for undersuch modifications are contemplated in the contract or not.contract. These modifications may alter the services provided under the contract, relatedrequired investments required or billing terms.

Finally, our contracts may not be renewed at the end of their term, which in the case of importantmajor contracts may obligerequire us to undertake aimplement costly reorganization or restructuring of assets and operations covered by the contract whenmeasures. When the contract does not provide for the transfer of the related assets and employees to the succeeding operator and/or adequate indemnificationappropriate compensation to cover our costs of termination.termination, the impact on our results could be substantial.

Our business operations in some countries may be subject to additional risks.

While our operations are concentrated mainly in Europe and North Americathe United States (sales generated outside of these regions represented approximately 12%16.2% of our total Group revenue in 2007)2009), we conduct business in markets around the world. The risks associated with conducting business in some countries, in particular outside of Europe, the United States and Canada, can include the non-payment or slower payment of invoices, which is sometimes aggravated by the absence of legal recourse for non-payment, nationalization, social,employee-related risks, political and economic instability, increased currencyforeign exchange risk and currency repatriation restrictions, among other risks.restrictions. We may not be able to insure or hedge against these risks. Furthermore, we may not be able to obtain sufficient financing for our operations in these countries. The establishmentsetting of public utility fees and their structure may depend on political decisi ons that can be highly political, slowing and impedingimpede for several years any increase in fee sfees, such that they no longer allow coverage ofcover service costs and appropriate compensation for a private operator. The occurrence of unfavorable

Unfavorable events or circumstances in certain countries may lead us to record exceptional provisions, write-downs and/or depreciation charges in connection with our operations in these countries,impairments, which could have a material adverse effect on our results.

Changes in the prices of fuel and other commodities may reduce our profits.

The pricesSome of our supplies of fuel and other commodities, which represent significant operating expenses for our businesses, are subjectactivities could cause damage to sudden increases. Although mostpersons or property

Some of our contracts contain tariff adjustment provisionsactivities could cause damage to persons (including injury or death), business disruption, and damage to real or personal property. It is our general policy to contractually limit our liability and to take out insurance policies that are intendedcover our main accidental and operational risks. However, these precautions may prove to reflect possible variations in prices of our supplies using certain pricing formulas, such as our price index formulas, there may be developments thatinsufficient, and this could prevent us from being fully protected against such increases, such as delays between fuel price increases and the time we are allowed to raise our prices to cover the additionalgenerate significant costs (including taxes), or our failure to update an outdated cost structure formula.  In addition, a sustained increase in supply costs and/or related taxes beyond the price levels provided for under our adjustment clauses could reduce our profitabilityus. For more information, please refer to the extent that we are not able to increase our prices sufficiently to cover such additional costs.risk factors describing environmental, health and safety compliance, below.



5



Back to Contents


We have conducted and may continue to conduct acquisitions, which could have a less favorable impact on our activities and results than anticipated, or which could affect our financial situation.condition.

As part of our businessexternal growth strategy, we have conducted and continue to carry out acquisitions of varying sizes, some of which are significant at the Group level. These acquisitions involve numerous risks, including the following: (i) the assumptions used inunderlying the underlying business plans supporting the valuations may not prove to be accurate,inaccurate, in particular with respect to synergies and expected commercial demand; (ii) we may notfail to successfully integrate the companies acquired businesses,and their technologies, products personnel and operations effectively;personnel; (iii) we may fail to retain key employees, customers and suppliers of the companies acquired; (iv) we may be required or wish to terminate pre-existing contractual relationships, which could beprove costly and/or onbe performed at unfavorable terms;terms and conditions; and (v) we may increase our indebtedness to finance these acquisitions. As a result, it is possible that the expected benefits of completedcomple ted or future acquisitions may not materialize wi thinwithin the time periods or to the extent anticipated, or that such acquisitions may affectimpact our financial condition.

Our business is affected by variations in weather conditions.

Certain of our businesses are subject to seasonal variations. For example, Dalkia realizesgenerates the bulk of its operating results in the first and fourth quarters of the year, corresponding to periods in which heating is used in Europe.  InEurope, while in the water sector, household water consumption tends to be higherhighest between May and September in the northern hemisphere. Accordingly, these two businesses may be affected by significant deviations from seasonal weather norms.patterns. This risk is offset in certain cases, bothfirst by the variable compensation terms included in contracts, and second by the geographical distributioncoverage of our businesses. The impact of weather conditions, together with the seasonal nature of ourthe Group’s businesses, may nonetheless affect our results.results of operations.

Our business is subject to CO2 market and emission allowance risks.

As an operator of energy installations and, to a lesser extent, as a result of our transportation and landfill site businesses, we are exposed to the inherent risks of the CO2 allowance system introduced by the European Union and the Kyoto Protocol. The rise in greenhouse gases in the atmosphere led certain States and the international community to introduce regulatory provisions to limit further increases. At the international level, the Kyoto Protocol came into force in February 2005. Directive 2003/87/EC of October 13, 2003 implementing the Kyoto Protocol, created an emission allowance trading system within the European Union, known as ETS (Emission Trading Scheme). The resulting system, which was set up in 2005, led to the creation of National Allowance Allocation Plans (NAAP).

In France, NAAP 1 was adopted for the period 2005-2007 and was followed by NAAP 2 covering the period 2008-2012. In 2006, the European Union launched a review of directive 2003/87/EC aimed at extending its application scope, strengthening controls and introducing an allowance trading scheme linked with the Kyoto protocol. At the beginning of 2008, the European Commission published a revised draft directive on the CO2 emissions allowance scheme for the period 2013-2020. This led to the adoption by the European parliament, at the end of 2008, of a “climate-energy” package which seeks to ensure compliance within the European Union with climate objectives by 2020: 20% cut in greenhouse gas emissions, 20% improvement in energy efficiency and 20% energy consumption in the European Union produced from renewable sources. This “climate-energy package” includes six new texts: a directive on renewable energies, a directive on the emission trading scheme (ETS), an effort-sharing decision on greenhouse gas emissions (outside ETS), a directive on the capture and storage of CO2, a directive on fuel quality and a directive on reducing CO2 emissions by cars.

The risk we face firstly relates to our ability to achieve the emission reductions imposed by the system over a number of years. As such, major and costly investment may be necessary in order to bring our installations into line with allocated allowances. Secondly, our ability to draw value from positions adopted in the management of the corresponding installations represents a separate risk, given the high volatility in allowance prices. While we have adopted an active approach to managing carbon emissions and allocated allowances by implementing appropriate structures and setting up an entity dedicated to the purchase, sale and pricing of the various types of greenhouse gas credits, the potential overrun by us of allocated emission allowances and the resulting purchase of additional allowances could generate significant additional costs compared with those we anticipate.

Finally, in 2009, the European Commission clarified the conditions governing the national grant of allowances for phase 3, commencing January 1, 2013. A portion of the allowances (based on the nature of the installation) required by the Group and its subsidiary Dalkia in particular, will have to be obtained through an auction system that could lead to a substantial additional cost. Whether this cost can be passed on to customers and in what amount, have not yet been determined.



6



Back to Contents


Our business operations are subject to geopolitical, criminal and terrorist risks.

Water is a strategic resource in terms ofthat contributes to public health. Accordingly, our activities must comply with laws and regulations that seek to safeguard water resources, production sites and treatment facilities against criminal or terrorist acts. Our activities inIn the areas of waste management, energy services and public transportation are also subject to similar risks.  Weour installations and vehicles may also havebecome terrorist targets around the world. In addition, our employees who work orand travel in areascountries where the risk of criminal acts, kidnapping or terrorism is either temporarily or permanently elevated.high. As a result, despite the preventive and safety measures that we have attempted to implement, any one of our activities may fall victim toimplemented by us and the insurance policies subscribed, a criminal or terrorist acts in the future.attack could negatively affect our reputation or operating results.

Our long-term contracts may limit our capacity to quickly and effectively react to general economic changes affecting our performance under those contracts.changes.

The generalinitial circumstances or conditions under which we enter into a contract may change over time, which may result in adverse economic consequences. Such changes vary in nature and foreseeability. Certain contractual mechanisms may help in addressing such changes and restoring the terminitial balance of the contract, particularly inbut they may not be fully effective. The implementation of such mechanisms may be triggered more or less automatically by the caseoccurrence of long-term contracts.  For example, changes in the prices of our suppliesa given event (for instance, price indexing clauses), or they may increase beyond levels that were foreseencall for a procedure or foreseeable at the timerevise or amend the contract was entered into or changes in end user behavior may significantly affect our financial performance under the contract.  Because our contracts generally do not allow us to unilaterally terminate them or interrupt or suspend the performance of our obligations under them, we attempt to foresee these possible changes at the time we negotiate our contracts and typically include adjustment mechanisms in our contracts (such as price index clauses or the right to initiate a review or modification process).  However, we may not always be able to foresee all potential changes or to negotiate adju stment clauses that cover all possible scenarios.  In addition, even if our contracts include these types of adjustment clauses, our ability to react to these changes is limited to the adjustments permitted by these clauses.  For example, our long-term contracts typically provide for pre-determined fees or payments for our services (either from the client or from the end user according to a set price list), and we cannot adjust these fees or prices to reflect anticipated shifts in costs or product demand other than in accordance with the termsagreement of the adjustment clause.  Also, our right to initiate a review or modification process in respect of a contract may be subject to conditions, including the consent of the otherboth parties to the contract or of a third party (such asparty. Accordingly, we may not be free to adapt our compensation, whether this consists of a price paid by the customer or a fee levied on end users based on an agreed-upon scale, in line with changes in our costs and demand. These constraints on us are exacerbated by th e long-term nature of contracts. In all cases and most particularly with regard to public authority).  Asservice management contracts, our actions must remain within the scope of the contract and ensure continuity of service. We cannot terminate unilaterally and suddenly a result,business that we believe is unprofitable, or change its features, except, under certain circumstances, in the event of proven misconduct by the customer.

Certain of our construction operations are performed under fixed-price contracts, containing performance cost and/or completion date commitments.

Through Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies, we perform “turnkey” contracts for the design and construction of infrastructure in the water sector, compensated at non-revisable fixed prices. The risks to which we are exposed under this type of contract are generally technical (design and choice of tailored and tried-and-tested technology), operational (site management during the performance, acceptance and warranty phases) and economic (fluctuations in raw material prices or foreign exchange rates).

In accordance with standard contractual practice, to the extent possible we seek to place these risks contractually with the customer. We may, however, encounter difficulties over which we have no control, relating, for example, to the complexity of certain infrastructure or construction contingencies, the purchase and ordering of equipment and supplies, or changes in performance schedules. These may lead to non-compliance with contract specifications or generate additional costs and construction delays, triggering, in certain cases, reductions in our revenue or contractual penalties.

In certain cases, we must take into consideration customer requests for additional work or integrate existing information or studies provided by the customer that may prove inaccurate or inconsistent, or we may be required to continue performing our obligations under ouruse existing infrastructure with poorly-defined operating characteristics.

While contracts even ifgenerally include clauses providing for the general conditionspayment of compensation, should events such as those detailed above occur, we are exposed to the risk of not obtaining amounts sufficient to cover the resulting additional costs, or circumstances of our performance are different from those that had been for eseen and provided for atobtaining such amounts only after the time the contract was signed, which in some cases may alter the financial equilibriumpassage of the contract and adversely affect our financial performance under the contract.time.

The rights of governmental authorities to terminate or modify our contracts unilaterally could have a negative impact on our revenue and profits.

Contracts with governmentalpublic authorities make up a significant percentage of our revenue. In numerous countries, including France, governmentalpublic authorities may modifyunilaterally amend or terminate contracts under certain circumstances, unilaterally but generally with indemnification.  In other countries, however,circumstances. While we often are entitled to compensation, this may not be true in all cases, and even when compensation is due, we may not be entitled to or be able to obtain full indemnification in the event our contracts areor timely compensation should a contract be unilaterally terminated by governmental counterparties.  the relevant public authority.



67



Back to Contents


We may make significant investments in projects without being able to obtain the required approvals for the project.

To engage in business, we must in most cases obtainwe must sign a contract and sometimes obtain, or renew, various permits and authorizations from regulatory authorities. The competition and/or negotiation process that must be followed in order to obtain such contracts is often long, costly, complex and hard to predict. The same applies to the authorization process for activities that may harm the environment, which are often preceded by increasingly complex studies and public investigations. We may invest significant resources in a project or public tender without obtaining the right to engage in the desired business noror sufficient compensation or indemnities to cover the cost of our investments.  These situations increaseinvestment. This could arise due to failure to obtain necessary permits or authorizations, or approval from antitrust authorities, or because authorizations are granted contingent on our abandoning certain of our dev elopment projects. This result increases the overall cost of our activities and if we do not obtaincould potentially, were the desired business or are forcedcost of failure to withdraw from a public tender,become too high, force us to abandon certain projects. Should such situations become more frequent, the scope and profitability of our business may not grow as much or as profitab ly as we hope.could be affected.

We must comply with various environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, which is costly and may, in the event of any failure to comply on our part, cause us to incur liability under these laws and regulations.

We incur significant costs of compliance with various environmental, health and safety laws and regulations.

We have madeincurred and will continue to makeincur significant capitalcosts and other expenditures to comply with our environmental, health and safety obligations.obligations as well as to manage the sanitary-related aspects of the services we provide. We are continuously required to incur expenditures to ensure that the installations that we operate comply with applicable legal, regulatory and administrative requirements, including generalspecific precautionary orand preventative measures, or to advise our clientscustomers so that they undertake themselves the necessary actions for the compliance of their installations. The costs related to these preventative measures are recorded as either operating expenses or as industrial investments. Our industrial investments in all areas totaled €2.642 billion in 2007.work.

Each of our operations,businesses, moreover, may become subject to stricter general or specific laws and regulations, and correspondingly incur greater compliance expenditures in the future. If we are unable to recover these expenditures through higher tariffs,prices, this could adversely affect our operations and profitability. Moreover, the scope of application of environmental, health, safety and other laws and regulations is becoming increasingly broad.increasing constantly. These laws and regulations now govern among other things, any dischargeall discharges in a natural environment, the collection, transport, treatmenttransportation and disposal of all types of waste, and the rehabilitation of old sites at the end of operations, as well as ongoing operations at new or oldexisting facilities.

Our operations and activities may cause damages or lead us to incur liability or other damages that we might be required to compensate.compensate or repair.

The increasingly broad laws and regulations under which we operate expose us to greater riskrisks of liability, in particular environmental liability, including in connection with assets that we no longer own and activities that have been discontinued. For example, the European directive of April 21, 2004 on environmental liability introduces throughout the European Union a framework of environmental liability, for serious environmental damage or threat of damage. This directive was enacted into French law dated July 30, 2003, relatingon August 1, 2008 and extends the scope of strict liability for certain serious environmental damage. With regard to the prevention of technological and environmental risks and the conduct of remediation activities, has strengthened the regulatory framework that appliesFrench law of July 30, 2003 strengthens obligations to discontinued operations and closedrestore certain sites and installations.at the end of their operating life, making the accrual of provisions mandatory under certain conditions. In certain instances, it requires reserves to be established in respect of such discontinued operations. In addition,addit ion, we may be required to pay fines, repair damage or undertake improvement works,work, even when we have conducted our activities with all due care and in total conformityfull compliance with operating permits. Regulatory authorities may also require us to conduct specific investigations and undertake remedial a ctivities, curtailsite restoration work for current or future operations or close facilities temporarilyto suspend activities as a result, in connection with applicable laws and regulations, including to preventparticular, of an imminent threat of damage or a change in light of expected changes in those laws and regulations.applicable standards.

In addition, we often operate installations that do not belong to us, and therefore do not always have the power to make the investment decisions required to bring these installations into compliance with new regulatory norms. In instances wherecompliance. Where the clientcustomer on whose behalf these installations are operated refuses to make the required investments, we may be forced to terminate our operating contracts.operations.

In the event of an accidentDespite this restrictive trend towards increasing regulation and constant efforts to improve risk prevention, accidents or other incident,incidents may still occur and we could also becomebe the subject of legal action to claims for personal injury,compensate damage caused to individuals, property damage or damage to the environment (including natural resources)the ecosystem). TheseIn such instances, these potential liabilities may not always be covered by insurance programs, or may be only partially covered. The obligation to take certain measures or compensate for such damagesdamage might have a material adverse effect on our activities, our resources, or resources.our profitability. Accordingly, the Group focuses considerable attention on controlling health risks, whether relating to the operation of its installations or resulting from environmental pollution which conventional treatment methods cannot fully correct. In particular, this may concern the development of air- or water-borne bacteri a, which are increasingly well identified, or the exposure of individuals (Company employees or third parties) to chemical and/or dangerous products or substances.



78



Back to Contents


Specific measures are required in connection with certain technological risks.

As part of ourOur subsidiaries in France or abroad may, under environmental services outsourcing contracts, our subsidiaries may be involved in the operation of top-tierperform activities at certain environmentally sensitive sites known as high threshold “Seveso” sites (AS classification(classified “AS” under the French ICPE, (Installations“Installations Classified for the Protection of the Environment) nomenclature)Environment” system) or lower-tier “Seveso”low threshold Seveso sites (or theirthe foreign equivalent) for, operated by industrial clientscustomers (particularly petroleum or chemical industry sites). “Seveso” facilities are places where dangerous substances are present in quantities equal to or above thresholds specified in European Union Directive 96/82/EC (also known as the Seveso II Directive), relating to the control of major accident hazards involving dangerous substances.  In these instances, we must handlemanage the provision of services with even greater care, given the more dangerous nature of the products, waste, effluents and emissions to be treated, as well as the close proximity of the installations we managemanaged by us to clientcustomer sites.

While the The regulatory regime governing Seveso facilities applies only within the European Union, but we operate several similar sites outside of this region. These sitesregion t hat are often subject to the same level of heightened regulationstringent regulation.

In France, the Group operates installations with characteristics similar to those covered by foreign governments, exposing us to potentially substantial liabilities in the eventSeveso regime (only certain of accident.

Among the facilities that we own and operate in France, one has been categorized a lower-tier “Seveso” facility (notwhich are classified as AS“AS” under the ICPE nomenclature)system). It is aWe have decided to apply all or part of the Seveso regime at certain of these sites, such as at the hazardous waste incineration facility operated by SARP Industries (Veolia Propreté) atEnvironmental Services) in Limay (Yvelines). The manipulation of waste and hazardous products in this facility can, in the case of an accident, cause serious damageYvelines. As a result, we are subject to the environment, neighbors or employees, exposing us to potentially substantial liabilities.same care standards and bear the associated costs as at sites that are covered by the Seveso regime.

Currency exchange and interest rate fluctuations may negatively affect our financial results and the price of our shares.

We hold assets, earn income and incur expenses and liabilities directly and through our subsidiaries in a variety of currencies. Our financial statements are presented in euro. Therefore,euros. Accordingly, when we prepare our financial statements, we must translate our foreign currency-denominated assets, liabilities, income and expenses in other currenciesexpense items into euroeuros at then-applicableapplicable exchange rates. Consequently, increases and decreasesfluctuations in the valueexchange rate of the euro in respect ofagainst these other currencies willcan affect the value of these items in ourthe financial statements, even if their intrinsic value has not changedis unchanged in theirthe original currency. For example, an increase in the value of the euro may result in a declinedecrease in the reported value, in euro,euros, of our interestsinvestments held in foreign currencies.

AtWe are also subject to risks related to fluctuations in interest rates. As of December 31, 2007,2009, approximately 48.7% of our netoutstanding financial debt excluding revaluation ofbore interest at floating rates, after taking into account hedging instruments amounted(see Note 29.1.1 to €15.1 billion, of which 26% was subject to variable rates and 74% to fixed interest rates, including 9% subject to variable rates with caps.  Our results of operations andour consolidated financial condition may be affected by changes in prevailing market rates of interest.statements). Fluctuations in interest rates may also affect our future growth and investment strategy since a rise in interest rates may force usVeolia Environnement to finance acquisitions or investments or refinance existing debt at a higher cost in the future.

Changes in the prices of energy and other commodities or in the price of recycled materials may reduce our profits

The prices of our energy and other commodity supplies are subject to significant fluctuations and represent major operating expenses in our businesses. Although most of our contracts include tariff adjustment provisions that are intended to pass on any changes in the price of supplies, often using price indexing formulas, certain events may prevent us from being fully protected against such increases, such as time lags between fuel price increases and the date when we are authorized to increase prices to cover the additional costs, or a mismatch between the price-increase formula and the cost structure (including taxes). A sustained increase in supply costs and/or related taxes could undermine our operations by increasing costs and reducing profitability, to the extent that we are unable to increase our prices sufficiently to cover such additional costs.

In addition, a substantial portion of our Environmental Services Division’s revenue is generated by its sorting-recycling and trading businesses, which are particularly sensitive to fluctuations in the price of recycled raw materials (paper and ferrous and non-ferrous metal). A significant and long-term drop in the price of recycled raw materials, combined with the impact of the current economic crisis on volumes, has affected and could continue to affect our operating results.

Changes in certain cogeneration contracts may affect our business

We are exposed to risks associated with fluctuations in electricity prices, primarily through Dalkia, which is a power producer with approximately 7,151 MW of installed power capacity. While a majority of the production installations are operated under purchasing regimes that insulate us from electricity market risks, we have direct market exposure with respect to production in the United Kingdom and Italy (73 MW installed capacity), as well as exposure to local market fluctuations with respect to approximately 2,000 MW of installed capacity, principally in the United States and Central and Eastern Europe. In addition, purchase commitments in France with respect to a total of approximately 736 MW of installed capacity are scheduled to expire between January 2011 and November 2013, increasing our potential risk. While we intend to manage this risk through the use of contracts with co unterparties active in these markets, we cannot assure you that these methods will be effective to protect us from these risks.



9



Back to Contents


Risks Relating to Our Shares and ADSs

Because preemptive rights may not be available for U.S. persons, the ownership percentages of our U.S. shareholders may be diluted in the event of a capital increase of our company.Company.

Under French law, shareholders have preemptive rights (droits préférentiels de souscription) to subscribe, on a pro rata basis, for cash issuances of new shares or other securities giving rights to acquire additional shares. U.S. holders of our shares may not be able to exercise preemptive rights for our shares unless a registration statement under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Securities Act”), is effective with respect to those rights or an exemption from the registration requirements imposed byof the Securities Act is available. We are not required to file registration statements in connection with issues of new shares or other securities giving rights to acquire shares to our shareholders. As a result, we may from time to time issue new shares or other securities giving rights to acquire additional shares at a time when no registration stat ementstatement is in effect. For example, in 2007If we effected aundertake future unregistered capital increase through the issuance of rights to acquire new shares to all of our shareholders, but those rights were generally exercisable only by persons located outside the United States.  Holdersincreases, holders of our ADSs wereand U.S. holders of our shares may be subject to dilution, which may not permitted to exercisebe fully compensated by the rights corresponding to the shares underlying the ADSs and received the net proceeds offrom the sale of these rights in the French market by the ADS depositary.



8



Back to Contents


rights.

We are permitted to file less information with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) than a company incorporated in the United States.

As a “foreign private issuer,” we are exempt from rules under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), that impose some disclosure and procedural requirements for proxy solicitations under Section 14 of the Exchange Act. Additionally, our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and “short-swing” profit recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and related rules with respect to their purchases and sales of our shares. Moreover, we are not required to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as U.S. companies with securities registered under the Exchange Act. Accordingly, there may be less information concerning our companyCompany publicly available from time to time than there is for U.S. companies at those times.

The ability of holders of our ADSs to influence the governance of our companyCompany may be limited.

Holders of our ADSs may not have the same ability to influence corporate governance with respect to our companyCompany as would shareholders in some U.S. companies. For example, the ADS depositary may not receive voting materials in time to ensure that holders of our ADSs can instruct the depositary to vote their shares. In addition, the depositary’s liability to holders of our ADSs for failing to carry out voting instructions or for the manner of carrying out voting instructions is limited by the deposit agreement. Finally, except under limited circumstances, our shareholders do not have the power to call shareholders’ meetings.



910



Back to Contents


ITEM 4: 4.

INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY

We are a leading global provider of environmental management services, which include water and wastewater services, waste managementenvironmental services, energy services (excluding the production, trading and sale of electricity, other than production through co-generation) and transportation services. Our clients include a wide range of public authorities, industrial and commercial services customers and individuals around the world.

The legal and commercial name of our companyCompany is “Veolia Environnement.” Our companyCompany is asociété anonyme,, a form of stock corporation, incorporated in 1995 pursuant to the French commercial code for a term of 99 years. Our registered office is located at 36/38, avenue Kléber, 75116 Paris, France, and the phone number of that office is (+33 1) 71 75 00 00. Our agent in the United States is Brian Sullivan.J. Clarke. He can be reached at Veolia Environnement, 700 East Butterfield Road,Water America LLC, 200 E. Randolph St., Suite 201, Lombard,7900, Chicago, IL 60148.60601.

Our operations are conducted through four Divisions, each specializing in a single business sector: Water, Environmental Services, Energy Services and Transportation. Our principal operating subsidiaries in each Division are Veolia Eau – Compagnie Générale des Eaux (Water), Veolia Propreté (Environmental Services), Dalkia (Energy Services) and Veolia Transport (Transportation). When referring to the activities of our Divisions, we refer to the division names, and when referring to entities within the Group, we refer to their legal names.

Historical Background

Our companyCompany traces its roots back to the creation of Compagnie Générale des Eaux by Imperial decreeDecree on December 14, 1853. During the same year, Compagnie Générale des Eaux won its first public service concession for the distribution of water in the city of Lyon, France. Our companyCompany developed its municipal water distribution activities in France by obtaining concessions in Nantes (1854), Nice (1864), as well as a 50-year concession for water distribution services in Paris (1860) and its suburbs (1869).

In 1980, Compagnie Générale des Eaux reorganized its water activities by regroupingbringing together all of its design, engineering and executionoperating activities relating to drinking water and wastewater treatment facilities underwithin its subsidiary Omnium de Traitement et de Valorisation (OTV). At the same time, Compagnie Générale des Eaux expanded its business during the 1980s with the acquisition of Compagnie Générale d’Entreprises Automobiles (CGEA, which would become Connex and Onyx, and later Veolia Transport and Veolia Propreté) and Compagnie Générale de Chauffe and Esys-Montenay (which would merge to become Dalkia). It also began significant international expansion.

In 1998, Compagnie Générale des Eaux changed its name to “Vivendi” and renamed its main water subsidiary “Compagnie Générale des Eaux.”Eaux”.

In April 1999, in order to better distinguish the separate existence of its two main businesses, communications and environmental services, Vivendi created our companyCompany under the name “Vivendi Environnement” to conduct all of its environmental management activities, which were then conducted under the names VivendiVeolia Water (water)(Water), Onyx (waste management)(Environmental Services), Dalkia (energy services)(Energy Services) and Connex (transportation)(Transportation).

On July 20, 2000, ourVivendi Environnement shares were listed on the Premier Marché of Euronext Paris, which became the Eurolist of Euronext Paris on February 21, 2005 and Euronext Paris on November 21, 2007.January 1, 2008.

In August 2001, ourVivendi Environnement shares were included in the CAC 40, the main equity index published by Euronext, Paris, and in October 2001 were listed in the form of American Depositary Shares for tradingReceipts on the New York Stock Exchange.

From 2002 to 2004, Vivendi (formerly known as Vivendi Universal)Universal progressively decreased its stake in our company,Company through successive disposals and dilution and held only 5.3% of our shares fromby December 2004 until2004. Since July 6, 2006, when Vivendi completed the sale of itsno longer holds any shares in our company.   Company.

In April 2003, we changed our name to “Veolia Environnement.”

Between 2002 and 2004, we undertook a significantmajor restructuring in order to refocus on our core environmental servicesEnvironmental Services activities. This restructuringprocess was completed in 2004 with the sale of various U.S. subsidiaries within our water division conducting certain non-core activities,in the Water Division and with the sale of our indirect interest in Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas (FCC), a Spanish company whose activities include construction and cement services, as well as other services related to the environment.

In April 2003, we changed our name to “Veolia Environnement.”  On November 3, 2005, we unveiled a new branding system for our group. Our water, waste management and transportation divisions currently operate under the same name: “Veolia.”



10



Back to Contents


Major Developments in 2007  

Below we discuss the main developments in our business during 2007.  The discussion below and in the remainder of Item 4 includes the revenue amounts that we expect to earn from various contracts (most of which are long-term contracts), including total revenue expected to be generated from all services under combined contracts to build and operate facilities.  These revenue amounts take into account updates to our volume and price assumptions since the date these contracts were publicly announced.  In addition, revenue amounts expected under foreign contracts won during 2007 have been converted into euro at the rate of exchange prevailing on December 31, 2007.  As a result, publicly announced revenue amounts may differ from the amounts of expected revenue included in this document.  In addition, these expected revenue amounts constitute forward-looking statements that involve r isks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those described under “Item 3. Key Information–Risk Factors.”  Actual revenue amounts may differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements.  See “Forward-Looking Statements” at the beginning of this document for a more detailed discussion of the risks and uncertainties to which our forward-looking statements are subject.

Cash rights offering

On July 6, 2007, we announced the success of our cash rights offering for an amount of €2.6 billion.  The subscription period lasted from June 14 to June 27.  The gross amount of the capital increase was €2,581,469,688 (including issue premium), resulting in the creation of 51,941,040 new shares.  As a result of this capital increase, we reinforced our shareholders equity and increased our financial flexibility in order to maintain growth following the announcement of several significant acquisitions since June 2006 and our 2007-2009 investment program.

New projects and acquisitions

In 2007, we reinforced our position in our business sectors with a series of new, targeted acquisitions which we hope will generate growth and cost synergies.

We invested more than €2.5 billion in external growth opportunities in our priority development areas during the 2007 fiscal year alone.  Following our acquisition of Cleanaway UK (third in waste management in the United Kingdom in June 2006, our acquisitions of Sulo (second in waste management in Germany) and TMT (the leading private provider of Italian thermal waste treatment) announced in April and May 2007, TNAI (which holds the largest private portfolio of heating and cooling networks in the United States) in June 2007, and part of the non-regulated activities of Thames Water which was finalized in November 2007 were the most significant.

We intend to continue this strategy in 2008 and 2009 by making value-generating investments that either lead to operational cost synergies, or accelerate development based on technological or commercial leverage in its prioritized geographical areas and on growth markets, in compliance with our investment criteria.

Innovation and new areas of activity

We seek to offer its clients innovative solutions that meet all of their sustainable development concerns. This goal has led us to study the development of new areas of activity related to our traditional activities and expertise and which can further our sustainable development prospects.  In 2007, we created a department of new areas of activity, which utilizes and relies on the existing teams and skills of our operational entities.

Several new areas of activity have already been identified and have been the object of initial projects or studies. The common feature of these new areas of activity is that they encourage growth and enhance the activities of our divisions. Examples include biofuels, wind generation or residential services. Other areas have been the focus of initiatives and investigations, such as air quality, ecological transportation or sustainable development (ecological neighborhoods and buildings).

In the field of renewable energies, we have developed the production of biofuels, a strong growth market.  We favor the production of biofuel from waste, such as used cooking oils.  Indeed, this solution presents a very positive environmental balance and the recycling of these oils is an integral part of the waste treatment process. This project, which utilizes the industrial skills of SARP Industries, creates significant synergies not only with our historical core activities (particularly recycling and collection), but also with the prospects for our fleets of vehicles. The first plant to produce biofuel from used cooking oils will open in 2008 in Limay. It will have a production capacity of 40,000 tons per year, which may grow to 80,000 tons per year.activities.



11



Back to Contents


The market for wind-generated energy also showsIn November 2005, we rolled out a strong growth potential sustainednew brand system aimed at increasing consistency between our Divisions and our visibility by continued support policies. It is an attractive proposition in certain countries in Europe,strengthening the identity and above all in the United Statescommon culture of Veolia Environnement around our service values. Our Water, Environmental Services and in Asia, where there is considerable growth potential.  In 2007, we acquired 50% of the capital of Eolfi, which currently operates 26 MW in France and is building 12 sites that represent an additional 120 MW capacity.  By the end of 2008, Eolfi’s production capacity is expected to reach more than 150 MW. In addition, numerous projectsTransportation Divisions are pending abroad, notably in Greece, Poland and Asia. With Eolfi, we can meet the expectations of customers, particularly local communities and industrial customers, who also wish to include a “wind-generated energy” aspect in their sustainable development projects.  Eolfi will allow us to optimize certain real estate asse ts that are ideal sites for wind turbines.

Finally, in the residential services sector, through our subsidiary Proxiserve, we have occupied a competitive position in the market for individual boiler maintenance.  More recently, Proxiserve has successfully developed a profitable and expanding domestic assistance activity (in plumbing). The millionth domestic assistance contract was carried out in November 2007.  Based on these activities, we intend to develop a whole range of services that will meet concerns relating to sustainable housing for individuals: energy diagnosis, installation of renewable energy equipment (such as heating pumps and flat plate collectors), maintenance of installations, and assistance and repair for heating, plumbing and electricity. Our activities relating to services for individuals are providednow united under a commonsingle brand, Veolia Habitat Services.

A significant presence on the desalination market

Resource scarcity stemming from land irrigation, drought, floods that degrade water quality, or the over-development of ground water tables, combined with growing needs for water (due to population density growth)“Veolia”, are a major challengewhich is linked to the productionname of drinkable water in certain arid regions, in particular regions where such phenomena are aggravated and reducetheir activity. Our Energy Services Division primarily operates under the availability of water.  The desalination of seawater is therefore expected to become one of the main alternative production methods for drinkable water in the coming decades.

Our division Veolia Eau, which has more than 100 years of desalination experience, is one of the few companies that can offer a complete range of services and innovative solutions, and is therefore in a strong position within this rapidly expanding market thanks to its subsidiaries specialized in construction and thanks to its operational experience. Its commercial successes in recent years speak for themselves.

In terms of design and construction, we are a leader in thermal and reverse osmosis desalination processes, and have at our disposal numerous standard-setters in all types of existing treatments within the various entities of Veolia Eau Solutions & Technologies (such as SIDEM and WESTGARTH).  In 2006 and 2007, Veolia Eau Solutions & Technologies won significant contracts in the Middle East, in Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and in the Fujairah Emirate of the United Arab Emirates.  We also benefit from established operational expertise and have a deep pool of experience, for instance in Ashkelon (Israel), which began operations in September 2005.  In 2006 and 2007, Veolia Eau won two contracts in Australia for the design, construction and operation of reverse osmosis desalination units to supply water to the cities of the Gold Coast and Sydney.

Market forecasts for the desalination of seawater, taking into account all techniques, estimate that production will increase significantly between now and 2015. Mediterranean countries (Algeria, Libya, Spain), China, Australia and the Middle East (Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates) will multiply their desalinated water production capacity by a factor of 2 to 10, with the countries of the Persian Gulf adding reverse osmosis to thermal desalination techniques (such as distillation)brand “Dalkia”.

Sustained activity growth and relevance of the sustainable growth model

Since our listing, we have achieved various milestones in our independence and organization, culminating in 2004 with our sale of non-strategic American assets and our interests in the Spanish company FCC. Our refocusing of activities on environmental services under long-term contracts placed us, as early as 2005, in a favorable position to sustain our rank as worldwide leader in environmental services, driven by a consistent strategy relying on proven capabilities.

Our 2007 fiscal year was another year of profitable growth, consistent with our objectives.  With revenue growth of 14% (14.9% on a constant exchange rate basis) in 2007, demonstrating continued commercial dynamism, and significant growth in operating income, we confirmed our capacity for profitable growth. We also recorded a significant increase in our net income attributable to the equity holders of the parent and improved our return on capital employed since 2002, reflecting increasing profitability for shareholders. The maturity of certain contracts makes it possible for us to continue to improve profitability and to emphasize the relevance of our profitable growth model.  As such, we continue to pay close attention to the quality of our portfolio of contracts and the selectivity of our investments.



12



Back to Contents


Our inclusion in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI) and FTSE4Good indexes

Created in 1999 and 2001, respectively, the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (DJSI) and FTSE4Good index select companies based on their performance in sustainable development.  We were included in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index and in the FTSE4Good index in September 2007.

Our selection demonstrates, in particular, our performance in relationships with stakeholders, especially in respect of human resources management, as well as with clients and local communities. In addition, our Environmental Management System was a significant factor in our inclusion in these indices.

We are also part of the ASPI Eurozone index (Advanced Sustainable Performance Indices). The ASPI Eurozone index, launched in March 2002, is composed of the 120 principal stocks of the Eurozone selected according to social, environmental and corporate governance criteria.




13



Back to Contents



BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Our Market

Traditionally, environmentalEnvironmental management services, which includecomprising drinking water treatment and distribution, wastewater treatment and collection, waste treatment and management, energy services (excluding the production, trading and sale of electricity, other than production through co-generation)electricity) and transportation were provided in an uncoordinated manner, each byare now recognized as a different entity. Moreover, public authoritiesseparate business sector. Private customers view these services as similar and industrial and commercial companies typically wereseek the expertise of a service provider able to meet manysupply a comprehensive service. Public sector customers are also aware of their own environmental needs without turningthe benefits of grouping together these services, however, such customers are often constrained to private firms specializing incontract separately for these areas. This situation has changed drastically in recent years.services due to administrative and budgetary structures or regulatory restrictions regarding contract awards. The need to take action to prevent further damage to the environment has, nonetheless, become a global reality. There is a growing need for excellence and efficiency, which has led decision-makersdecision-m akers to seek a global approach to the management of activities affectinghaving an impact on the environment in orderwith a view to devel opdeveloping solutions that allow interaction between and optimization amongof these environmental management services. These measures, now widespread,widely accepted, have led to an increased demand for integrated environmental management services. This trend has been highlighted byincreased with the continued global expansion of industrial and commercial companies, which has generated a need for environmental management service providers who are able to respond to their clientscustomers’ needs on an international scale.

We believe that the demand for external and integrated customized packages ofglobal environmental management services is likely to grow around the world for the following reasons:

InFaced with increasingly strict environmental standards, public and private parties do not always have the necessary technical or operational resources that specialist private operators can mobilize to deal with environmental problems effectively and on a worldlower cost basis; they therefore seek the legal security offered by an operator that combines accelerated urbanization with demographic growth, major investmentsaccepts responsibility for the management of these activities. Expertise in environmental projectsregulations is a determining factor in the choice of operators and services, as well as effective management, are needed in order to meet increasingly stringent environmental standards, provide growing urban populations with adequate environmental services and replace existing environmental infrastructure.  an asset that sets us apart from the competition.

In addition, public demand, which now widely reflects a concern for sustainable development, must respect commitments made at the international level and must set exemplary standards. The qualitative criteria underlyingIn a world that combines accelerated urbanization with demographic growth, major investments in environmental requirementsprojects and services, as well as sustainable management, are increasingly a decisive factorneeded in order to provide growing urban populations with tailored environmental services and to replace obsolete environmental infrastructures.

Nonetheless, the choice of providers, which is an advantage for us.financial difficulties that plague all parties, whether they are public authorities or private companies, could lead to certain decisions being postponed, especially when they involve new investment.

Governments throughout the world face budgetaryHowever, these financial constraints and often lack the technical and operational skills of private sector firms to address environmental issues efficiently.  As a result,could also encourage public authorities and private businesses are increasinglycompanies to seek the most cost efficient solutions and lead them to consider outsourcing part of their activities, or turning to the private sectora specialist service provider able to address their environmental needs.

Public and private entities are increasingly attemptingset up a structure satisfying these requirements. They often seek to simplify the administrationcontractual process by entrusting the performance of their complex operations by outsourcing a wide variety of responsibilitieshighly varied services to a single partner, thereby creatingwho is able to provide performance commitments. This offers numerous opportunities to companies who are able to propose a business opportunity for companies capable of offering a broadwide range of integrated environmental management services in an integrated fashion.

Large private firmsservices. Increasingly, they expect service offers that reflect their specific requirements, are adaptable, and public authorities increasingly recognize that a “one size fits all” approach will not meethave been tailored to closely match their unique and changing needs. As a result, demand for customized environmental management services has increased.

The increasingly multinational profile of many large industrial and commercial firms encourages themexpectations. Finally, they expect the organizational structure to outsource non-core activitiesgenerate productivity gains, to companies with similar geographic reach in order to simplify administration and ensure they receive consistent service at each of their facilities.


be shared by both parties.

We thinkbelieve that each of these trends, taken individually, createsoffers significant opportunities for companies with our expertise, and, taken as a whole, they allow our company, in particular,enable us to provide high-qualityhigh quality, innovative, and, (dependingdepending on customer needs)needs, integrated environmental management services in markets around the world. In order to seize these opportunities, we must, more than ever, strive to offer high-quality services at competitive prices.



12



Back to Contents


Our Clients


Customers

We provide environmental management services to a wide range of public authorities, industrial and commercial services clientsservice-sector customers and private individuals around the world.




14



Back to Contents


Public Authorities


Demand byfrom public authorities (often small localitieslocal authorities that are increasingly pooling resources) has beenis influenced and strengthened by trends relating to the search for quality, efficiency, innovation, the rationalization of public procurement and reduced costscost reduction (by integrating operating concerns starting atfrom the developmentdesign stage), and by theira commitment to environmentalassuming their responsibility for the environment and particularly with respect tothe management of water resources, air pollution, mass transportation policies and energy consumption. These trends, combined with a movement towards greater urbanization, are increasing the need for essential environmental services.


While weWe have the know-how to adapt to our clients’customer expectations and needs, but we also believe that our global contract model, which permitsgives us the ability to provide services tied to performance obligations, as well as, depending on client requests, the development, constructioncustomer needs, to design, build and even financing offinance necessary investments, remains as relevant as ever. It enhancescontributes to innovation and efficiency through mutual research efforts, andstimulated by the periodic re-tender forcompetitive tendering of contracts. DependingThis model takes on different legal forms depending on the country involved, this model may take several legal forms.traditions in each country. Certain countries, including those subject togoverned by European Union law, distinguish public markets from concessions (or other forms of Public Private Partnership, or PPP), based on whether operating rights are transferred and the service is providedextent to a public entity or directly to end-users,which we assume operating risks, and depending on whether the assignment is basedcontract focuses on thea service beingto be provided or the completed work, or on the risk to revenues assumed by the compa ny.


construction of infrastructure.

In France, since the middle of the 19th19th century, public authorities have generally chosen to haveentrust the management of public services (water, sanitation, transportation, waste collection, and urban heating) managed byto companies throughunder contracts that were traditionally considered to be concessions (or leases,operating contracts in the absence of an investment completion assignments)component) and which are now legally qualifiedclassified by law as public service delegations,delegation contracts, but which remain concessions under the European Community’sUnion definition. They have frequently preferred, at least in the case offor certain public services, to continue to manageretain control over the construction of installations, as well as their financing, before making them available to the service provider or lessee duringfor the term of the contract.


In the last few years, a new trend has emerged in whichwhereby public authorities in all countries, including France, have asked companies to manage not only the design and construction of the necessary development and completion of work andpublic infrastructure, installations or public facilities and equipment (as varied as for example, administrative orand educational buildings, hospitals, transportation infrastructure, prisons, waterwastewater treatment facilities or household waste treatmentprocessing plants), but also their financing and long-term maintenance, before recovering them at the end of the contract. TheseTwo main categories of these contracts whichhave emerged, although, together, they are often categorizedreferred to as PPPs, fall into two main categories.  ThePPPs. In the first category, which includes contracts similarbelonging to those in the market category:category, the resources intended to cover the cost of workinfrastructure and their financing are similar to a contract price paid or guaranteed amount fromby the public authority, and the service is provided to the pu blic authority once work is completed.  The sec ondusing the completed infrastructure. In the second category, which includes contracts resemblingequivalent to concessions under the European Community’s definition:Union law, the resources must be sought from aobtained through the commercial operation of the public service (the(i.e. the public or general-interest service whose operation has been delegated), which is the main focuspurpose of the contract, with the completionconstruction of work beinginfrastructure only a means to that end. Distinctproviding the necessary means. Different IFRS accounting treatments according to the IFRS standard (reporting or non-reporting ofapply in each case (depending on whether a financial asset corresponding to debt ofa receivable from the public authority) apply in each case.  We preferauthority is recognized or not). It is also possible to distinguish these PPPs based on the nature of the assignments (“Buildservices entrusted, such as “Build Operate Transfer” (BOT) with financing, or “BOT”“Design, Build, Operate” (DBO), “BFOT” if financing is added, or “DBFOT” if development is added).


with design but excluding financing.

In France, since the public market code (code des marchés publics) now prohibits entrusting companies with the construction and operation of a commissioned project, on one hand and all of its financing assignments, on the other, it became necessary, in orderauthorities decided to encourage the development of thisa type of global PPP contract (which does not fall underwhereby public authorities contract with a private enterprise that undertakes the categoryfinancing, construction, maintenance and/or operation (or provision of services directly to the end-user) in exchange for periodic installment payments from the public service delegations (délégations de service public), which isauthorities. To this end, the French term for community concessions), to createOrder of June 17, 2004 created a new category of partnershippublic works contract, classified as a “partnership contract” (contrat de partenariat). This reform was introduced to address restrictions arising under prior regulations. In particular, public bodies had previously not been authorized to enter into contracts created under a Frenchordonnancedated June 17, 2004.  Thisordonnanceallows public authorities to entrustgoverned by private operators (who may be associated with financial organizations) withlaw when those contracts delegated both the entire responsibility for building and/or financing an installationconstruction and operating responsibilites to the services related thereto, in exchange for compensationprivate entitiy; similarly, under the prior French regulations, private law could not gove rn contracts that isincluded project financing, whenever there was no accompanying operating concession or delegation of public interest services paid by users.

At EU level, on November 19, 2009, the European Commission published a major communication recommending the development of Public Private Partnerships (PPP). According to the Commission, this term encompasses all long-term contracts where a private enterprise is charged with construction, operation and financing, irrespective of whether the contract takes the legal form of a concession or a procurement contract. It highlights the economic benefits of PPPs which should respond to the need for current and future investments in public auth ority as a function of performance.services.



13



Back to Contents


This contractual model, characterized by a contract between athe public entity responsible for a service and private companies,the company operating this service, whatever theirits legal form, is widelyfrequently used, for the provision of collective services, but is not the only available model.  Publicmodel available. The expansion of its use is often slowed by preconceived ideas entrenched in a country’s history, which require the management of certain services to inhabitants, such as water distribution, to be provided by public entities. We therefore offer our services to these entities. Conversely, public authorities may decide that they should not be directly involved in the provision of certainsome public services, even general interest services. In these instances,such cases, they are usually do not own the owners of facilities or networks, and do not enter into contracts with a preferred private operator;operators; instead, they leave the provision of the public service to the market. They may nonetheless occasionallySometimes, however, they verify the abilitiesc ompetence of private operators by issuing operating licenses and regulating service conditions and prices.prices, although they may limit their intervention to ensuring compliance with general regulations. This situation rarely arises with respect to water services, which are considered essential, but is more common in the fields offor energy services, waste management and transportation. Public authorities may also havedemonstrate their interest in the services rendered by taking an ownership interest in the private operator in these instances; w eoperator. We may seek to acquire a stake in these operators as well.


such operators.



15



Back to Contents


Services Sold Directly to Individuals


We also offer household services directly to private individuals through our specialized subsidiaries. These services include assistance with and maintenance relating toof privately-owned water (including meter-reading),installations (located on private property after the water meter) and heating and gas services.


installations.

Industrial or Commercial Servicesand Service Sector Companies


We offer our industrial and commercial services clientsservice sector customers a largewide range of services, which generally aim to achievecovering two major environmental goals: on the following two main goals relating to environmental protection:


provide clientsone hand, providing customers with and optimizing consumption of the servicesutilities necessary for their industrial processes (vapor,(steam, industrial heating and cooling, processedprocess water, demineralized water, compressed air, etc.) and, optimizing their consumption thereof, and

reduceon the other hand, reducing the impact of their industrial processes on the environment, which may include treating effluents, recycling and recovering waste, and maintaining durable and efficient waste elimination channels.


We often partner with such clients over the long term, and offer customers innovative solutions tailored to the needs of each industrial site.


We adopt a long-term partnership approach, entering into long-term contracts which allow for variation in services to account for changes in the customer’s needs and business.

We believe that the further development of our industrial clientcustomer base will make up a significantoffers considerable growth area.potential. In particular, multiservicethe importance of multi-service contracts entered into with industrial clients have assumed an increasingly important role and are expected to continue to do so.  See “—Development of Synergies: Multiservice Contracts to Benefit Industrial and Commercial Services Clients” below.


customers is constantly increasing.

Our Overall Strategy

Our aim is to continue to reinforceSince our position as the leading provider of environmental services. Ourcreation, our strategy focuses on developing the most appropriate environmental services solutions for our local and industrial clients; maintaining a geographically diverse area of activity; developing a significant presence in growth markets with high potential and accelerating synergies between our different businesses.    

Byhas been aimed at strengthening our position as a global reference in the leading provider ofexpanding environmental services worldwide, we continuemarket. Going forward, our ambition is to implementset the corporate standard in sustainable development.

We are the sole international company focused entirely on the environmental services business, operating through four Divisions: Water, Environmental Services, Transportation and Energy Services. We operate both in France and abroad, serving a customer base primarily composed of public authorities, but also including industrial and service sector customers.

We provide most of our business model aimed at improving ourservices under secured long-term contracts that generate recurring income. The services rendered must be tailored to the specific requirements of each customer. Achieving both economic efficiency and financial performance.  Thisenvironmental performance is a resulttime-consuming and the length of economiesthe contract term allows performance gains to be generated over time as part of scalean overall strategy encompassing technical, management and technological expertise, combined with significant levels of research investment, long-term commitments to clients and managed risk.social considerations.

By providingOver the most appropriate environmental services, we are able to optimize our client relationships.


While preserving our local character,past fifteen years, we have become a major actor in both the services and the concessions businesses. We have achieved a unique position within these two client segments.  In 2007, we reinforced our core business in large European countries through targeted acquisitions in the United Kingdom, Germany and Italy.


With respect to our municipal activities, we have added to our impressive portfolio of existing French and European clients (Prague, Bucharest, Nottingham, Braunschweig), and have also achieved a number of commercial successes in the United States (Indianapolis, Chicago, Boston) and in the Asia Pacific region (Canton, Shanghai, Incheon, Melbourne).  Thus, we have illustrateddemonstrated our ability to participate in large privatizationsdevelop management models adapted to different countries and, win bids for large projects.


We have also conductedas a significant portionresult we now carry on over half of our business outside of France. Given the scale of requirements in the environmental services sector, we have the opportunity to continue our international expansion in a selective manner, favoring high economic development regions and countries with the best track record for accepting our industrialcorporate model and commercial services clients, particularly for the provision of energy and waste management services.  We have also created a new business portfolio made up of large industrial accounts (Peugeot, Novartis, Renault),complying with a significant contribution coming from multi-service contracts.long-term contractual commitments.


Successful geographic diversification


Our international business continuesWhile continuing to increase along with our volume of businessexpand in France which has continuedand Europe, the historical home of our businesses, we are also focusing on the countries of North Asia, particularly China, where there is an important need for service requirements linked to grow at an average annual rate of over 5% per year since 2000.


urban growth that meet environmental standards. We are also focused on North America and the Middle East and the Persian Gulf.



1614



Back to Contents


Beyond Europe,Over-and-above improving economic and financial performance, essential to a solid balance sheet and creating shareholder value, we aim to maintain and strengthen our performance with innovation, helping us to stay substantially ahead of the competition and anchor our corporate performance in the long-term, thanks to which has becomethe employability and professional satisfaction of employees can be maintained in a spirit of solidarity as technology evolves. We also aim to improve our domestic market,contribution to society, by supporting the common good on behalf of customers in territories where we have also achieved strongoperate. Veolia Environnement aims to be an exemplary company, adopting a balanced and responsible approach in all areas.

Adapting our strategy to the economic climate

In order to maintain this potential over the long-term, we must continually adapt. We are therefore strengthening our efficiency and cost reduction program, maintaining our efforts in the Environmental Services sector, primarily with a view to turning around activities in Germany and Italy and continuing to rotate our asset portfolio through a structured arbitrage policy.

Until 2007, Group growth was mainly organic and profitable. External growth transactions in 2007 and 2008 were financed by a share capital increase in 2007 and internally generated profits. As such, we currently enjoy a healthy financial structure. No major debt repayments are due before 2012 and the average maturity of debt is ten years, with 64% of net debt in the form of bonds.

Our profitability suffered a mechanical dilution due to strategic acquisitions focused on providing high quality platforms, notably in Germany, to strengthen the Group’s positions and assets with a longer pay-back, which represent an inherent part of the Group’s long-term contracts, but which enable us to continue our development in growth sectors, particularly in the United States and Asia.China. We have taken onhope to achieve an increase in Group profitability from the improved profitability of recent acquisitions and a significant rolemore balanced split between assets with a longer pay-back and other Group assets. In addition, measures already implemented in energy services2009 and which will be continued in 2010 (reduction in the United States.  Our presence in developed countries presents relatively little risk of decreasing as it is largely unaffected by relocationscost base and restructurings.


We have also developed a significant presence in emerging and developing countries. We regularly add new contracts and expand our energy services activities in China.  Our economic position in these areasrotation of the worldasset portfolio) will help accelerate a return to higher profitability in the short-term. (see “Item 5 – Operating and Financial Review and Prospect s”).

Investment activity will be subject to increased vigilance, with the application of more stringent selection criteria. This explains our decision to encourage profitable organic growth offering high added value, which mobilizes our discriminating expertise in complex, global challenges. We are also continuing our asset disposal plan. The disposal of assets with a value of some €3 billion is much more significant thannow scheduled for the proportion of our revenues earnedperiod 2009-2011 (after generating €1.3 billion in these areas suggests.


A strategy focused on growth and high-potential markets


Our strategy is to focus on growth markets.  An increasing awareness of the challenges relating to sustainable development and its impact on environmental policies has resulted in significant growth opportunities.  


Faced with increasingly restrictive regulations and2009), in order to keep up with competition, moreinternally generate the resources necessary for long-term growth. Finally, we plan to accelerate the cost reduction program launched pursuant to strategic objectives set in 2007, in order to adapt the Company to the global economic crisis. Cost savings are targeted to reach €250 million in 2010. This program to reduce the cost base will become a permanent program that will be overseen by the newly created Operations Department.

We believe that the decentralized structure of the Group allows us to be highly reactive. The success of the measures described above will require substantial efforts at all levels of Veolia Environnement, which will be placed under greater pressure. This decentralized structure, organized along geographical lines, was reinforced in 2008. It is based on the appointment of Company managers in charge of one or several countries in each geographical region where we are present (Central and more industrial companies outsource environmental services through long-term partnerships. Their partners generally work on allEastern Europe, France, Asia, Middle East/Africa, North America and Australia, Northern Europe, South America and Southern Europe). The role of their industrial sites worldwidethese managers is transversal and tendprimarily involves, at a local level, the coordination and implementation of the strategy and commercial policy of the Company and its subsidiaries, the representation of the Group and its businesses and the implementation of shared and mutualized resources. Coordination within each region will be the responsibility of persons chosen notably among Division Chief Executive Officers that are members of the Group’s Executive Committee. The aim is to satisfy the demands of our customers for a single contact able to provide a full range of services.


Expansion in municipal markets principally results from the combination of several demographic factors: an increase in population size on the one hand,comprehensive response to major transversal challenges, such as climate change and the urban development rate on the other. Growth is also a function of economic activity and living standards. The tightening of environmental restrictions and related regulations has fuelled our growth.  A recent example of this growth potential within these markets is the success of desalination projects in the Middle East.


Economic constraints affecting our industrial and municipal clients increase their need to reduce water and energy consumption and waste production. Our position as a service provider, as opposed to a utility provider, generally allows us to leverage this trend.  


Additional growth potential in related businesses


Because of our expertise, commercial relationships, and geographical distribution, we possess several important advantages allowing us to develop services that are directly related to our environmental services.  These opportunities result from new demand relating to changes in the economic, ecological and political landscapes, and which are all related to the promotion of sustainable development.  Examples of this trend include green fuels, wind energy and residential services.


Synergies between our different businesses accelerate our growth


In our environmental services business with both public authorities and industrial clients, we enjoy important synergies between our water, waste management, transportation and energy services divisions.  Since we offer a complete range of services, our clients have broadened the scopetaking account of the services they seek from us.rarity of essential resources such as water, air and energy.


This synergy is particularly evident within countries or municipalities where demographic changes, urbanization and economic development have accelerated significantly. In these cases, we have been called upon to find solutions to the growing environmental problems facing clients.  We offer a significant competitive advantage over funds or other financial investors, who have been weakened by the current market crisis.


Strong economic and financial resources


Our solid position results from market growth trends, but also from our competitive assets, including our technological and technical expertise, our financial stability, our geographic presence, and our experience in providing environmental services in compliance with regulatory requirements.  The success of our capital increase, completed in July 2007, also strengthened our financial capacity, thereby ensuring our development and reducing our exposure to market fluctuations.


Size advantages


Our size alone provides us with significant synergies.  In addition, our presence in all segments of the value chain means that our vertically integrated structures allow us to maximize the benefits of added value.




1715



Back to Contents


SupportBy adapting to the current economic downturn, we will be ready to capitalize, when the time comes, on our position as a global reference in complementary diversified activities, as well as on the benefits of our size, wide geographical presence and synergies between our businesses. Our businesses offer strong growth potential in the medium to long term as a result of demographical growth, particularly in urban areas, and increasingly strict environmental standards. Some examples of growth opportunities include:

According to a report by an independent third party, by 2015, the potential market for seawater desalination, a market in which we have a leadership position due to our technological expertise, could represent €5 billion per year, while used water recycling capacity could increase by an average annual rate of over 10%.

According to the OECD, household waste production, which has been increasing steadily in OECD countries over the last two decades, is expected to continue to increase through 2020 from 500 to 650 kg per inhabitant. 30% of current energy consumption could be optimized without the need for any major technological change.

In the urban transportation sector, the proportion of the population living in urban areas over the next 30 years is projected to increase by a possible 30%, according to the United Nations Population Information Network. This, combined with the necessarily increasing commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, opens up significant development opportunities.

The Group has taken a proactive approach to these challenges and offers ways of accelerating or facilitating the necessary or foreseeable changes that may be decided by its partners and, more generally, by our companies and all other players. This approach is primarily reflected by a research and development policy and the practical development of technological developmentsinnovations. We are also focused on the systematic development of synergies between current and improved know-how


future components of our activities and businesses and pay constant attention to optimizing our teams. We concentrate on best practices and professional skills of team members and contractual engineering that progressively integrates a “thriftier” management of natural resources (water, energy, raw materials, public spaces, etc.)

We have been expandingmust build on our Researchstrengths, which include our presence in markets that are structurally buoyant, our large asset base, our major competitive advantages, our reactivity and Development activities for a long period of time. Research and Development is essentialproximity to accomplishing our missions and allows us to  respond to the needs of our clients. Since 2000, we have centralized our R&D business into one unique organization which is now supported by the strategic research, innovation and sustainable development committee created in 2006 by our board of directors.


We also benefit from the technical exchanges in areas such as prevention of the Legionnaires’ disease, treatment and recycling of sediment, bioenergy, and management of High Environmental Quality buildings.


Long-term contracts


We make long-term commitments to our clients. Our human resources policy, which emphasizes, among other things, employee training, allows us to focus on the long term, in particular through the considerable professional efforts of Veolia Expertise (Veolia Compétences), a program that was renewed in 2007.  In 2005 and 2006, this program allowed us to make extensive recruitments in France.


Moreover, aside from its social, environmental and ethical aspects, sustainable development directly influences the expectations of clients, thus forming a crucial element within the commercial dialogue. Sustainable development trends have led to changes in our economic modelcustomers, in order to move from a volume-maximizing model to a resource-optimizing model.


Managed risks


Given our growth objective, we have implemented a management and risk calculation policy, marked in 2007 bybecome the mapping of the major risks atcorporate benchmark for sustainable development. Within this framework, the Group aims to restore profitability, in order to achieve profitable organic growth, without increasing debt, thereby achieving a balance between growth and division levels.  By putting in place a coordinated risk prevention and management plan, we are addressing this issue of fundamental concern to our future development.profitability.


These various strategic factors have allowed us to develop a profitable growth platform with room for future accelerated growth.


Our Strategy by Division

Water

Our water division, Veolia Eau,Water Division intends to continue to expandexpanding its services around the world, while striving to ensure the quality and safety of drinkingthe water it provides, the conservation of natural resources and the protection of the environment.

The growth potential of the international market for water services is drivenenhanced by four factors in particular:main factors:

population growth and higher urban density,density;

strengtheningthe tightening of environmental standards and health regulations,regulations;

the growing acceptance of the delegated public service management model and public-private partnerships as alternatives to public management, andand;

the on-going refocusing byof industrial clientscustomers on their core businesses.business.

Given this growth potential, we will continue ourto adopt a selective development in orderapproach to optimize ourthe allocation of our resources, our operating costs and our profitability. In order toTo take advantage of market opportunities, we relythe Water Division capitalizes on ourits technical expertise, ourits experience in managing clientcustomer relations and the mobilization of local teams on the ground in order to anticipateforesee the future needs of public authorities. We will also continuefocus, in particular, on developing employee skills to train our employeesenable us to meet the challengesfuture challenges. The development of tomorrow.  Veolia Eau’s technical expertise in variousareas such as desalination methods, and wastewater recycling in particular,solutions represents a major effort to adapt to ongoing changes in market conditions.

the market. Going forward, therefore, Veolia Eau will seek to capitalize onbusiness trends in the Water Division are characterized by the continued sustained pace of long-term international development opportunities (despite the maturingcurrent economic climate), the maturity of its largerlar ger contracts and the productivity gains resulting from efficiency programs (relating to purchasing,that have been implemented (encompassing purchases, information systems and sharing of best practices).



1816



Back to Contents


Waste ManagementEnvironmental Services

Through Veolia Propreté,our Environmental Services Division, we intend to become one ofcontinue expanding as the world leadersglobal benchmark in the waste managementthis sector.  As is the case with our other businesses, the waste management

Demand in this sector is showing signs of consistentrising, driven by growing environmental awareness resulting in increased regulation and lasting demand, which has been reinforced by the tightening of environmental rules and regulations coupled with increasedhigher public demandexpectations in a number of countries.countries and the dawn of a new age where raw materials and energy are rare, accelerating the transformation of waste treatment and recovery methods. As a result, capable experts who can provide long-term services under cost-effective conditions and in compliance with environmental regulations are becoming more highly sought after.

WithinIn this favorable market environment in Europe, the United States and the Asia-Pacific region, we have the following priorities for our waste management division:Veolia Propreté will focus its efforts to:

enhancing ourincrease the profitability of its activities by renegotiating fees, maximizing the use of its production tools and reducing structural costs, while seeking, wherever possible, to generate economies of scale with the Group’s other businesses.

enhance its waste treatmentprocessing capabilities, by accompanying the transformation of waste processing methods and developing our technological expertise in waste treatment and recovery;its recovery technologies;

strengthening our service offering to industrial clientsstrengthen its competitive advantages and the added value offered by its services, while developing the technical content of its businesses and capitalizing on our masteryits command of the entire waste management chain, while seekingin order to generate synergies with our other operating divisions;

increasing the profitability of our activities by renegotiating fees, maximizing productivityoffer industrial and reducing structural costs; while ensuring that all of our activities contribute to the development of high value-added services.municipal customers comprehensive waste management solutions.

Energy Services

Through Veoliaour Energy Services (Dalkia),Division, we are the Europeana world leader in the management of energy services. The Energy Services Division specializes in the provision of energy services sector.

and is present in forty-one countries around the world. The opportunities in thethis sector are significant, due to increases inthe increase over a long period of energy prices and greater public awareness of environmental problems, whichproblems. These are linked, in particular, to the risk of climate change and have undeniably encouraged searchesled to the search for solutions such as Dalkia’s initiatives to reduce the effectsproduction of greenhouse gases and encourage energy conservation. Political and regulatory developments in 2009 (European Union energy-climate package, global negotiations in preparation of the Copenhagen conference), further strengthened this favorable context.

Dalkia’s development strategy is focused primarily on heating and cooling networks, theenergy management ofin service sector buildings and retail centers, the handling of industrial utilities, andas well as energy provision and services in the health sector. Dalkia has fully embraced the objectives of reducing energy consumption and promoting renewable energy sources discussed internationally as part of the fight against climate change and we make the pursuit of these two objectives a priority, while providing expertise and service.

It includesDalkia’s development strategy focuses on the following geographical priorities:

pursuingcontinued growth in Southern Europe (including Italy and Spain)by participating in the trend toward market consolidation and by developing our offers to the private sector;across all its business sectors;

pursuing growth in the areadevelopment of large heating networks, particularly in France and in Central and Eastern Europe, and in large cooling networks in the Middle East;East, as well as entering the Russian market for heating networks;

pursuing growththe strengthening of its presence in North America, particularly the United States, by offering management services for management of networks, industrial utilities, shopping malls and shopping malls; andhealth centers;

pursuing growththe business development in China (networks and industrial utilities) and in Australia..

These priorities will depend on our ability, inIn the context of deregulated energy markets in Europe, these priorities are based on our ability to offer innovative technical solutions focused on energy efficiency, that often combine our expertise in several areas. We also aim to promote our integrated outsourcing services to public clientscustomers as well as to service sector and industrial clients,customers, by combining optimized services for facilities management (heating, air-conditioning, utilities, electricity, lighting).

Transportation

Through Veolia Transport, we seek to be a leading European and worldwide private operator of public transportation services.



1917



Back to Contents


Transportation

Through our specialized subsidiary, Veolia Transport, we aim to become a major transportation service provider on a worldwide scale.

Between 2000 and 2030, the proportion of the world population living in urban areas is expected to increase from 50% to 60%, and urban transporttransportation needs are expected to increase by 50% by 2020 (source: International Association of Public Transport). These demographic changes will likely increaseraise concerns relating toregarding the environment and urban congestion withand help make public transportation services constituting a major concern for the local authorities and inhabitantscity dwellers. In addition, the Transportation business is linked to the environmental performance of large cities.  Transportation always has an impact ontowns and regions, regional competitiveness, development and growth, the imageidentity and identitysolidarity of a large city, its economic development, urban renewal projects,citizens and local solidarity.quality of life.

The major challenges in this sector are related to the ever-increasing need for new transport infrastructures,infrastructure and the growing demand to customize mass transport, create attractive public transport networks, address environmental concerns and todeal with the growing demand for the customizationdirect and indirect costs of mass transportation.automobile congestion.

Veolia Transport’s strategy is to improve itsfocuses on improving performance in its basicour core business of passenger transportation, activity with the following priorities:

Continuedcontinuing efforts to addressin marketing, innovation and environmental concerns in ordersustainable development to continue to better satisfy clients;constantly improve customer satisfaction;

A focus onconstantly improving business expertise in all local or regional passenger transportation;  land transportation methods;

Selective growthgiving geographical priority to a small number of countries based on the attractiveness of markets and the intensity of local competition;

Continued growthinnovating both in related activities such as railway freight givennew mobility sectors (e.g. bikes, car-sharing, collective taxis) and in information and energy technologies.

Furthermore, we are currently discussing a combination of our Transportation business with Transdev, owned by the synergiesCaisse des Dépôts et Consignations and importance for the environment.RATP (see Item 8: “Financial Information Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information – Significant Changes”, below).

Our Services

Our company is an environmental services provider, and is the only major provider to offer a complete range of services.  We are able to provide clients with a full-service package tailored to fit their individual needs, which may include, for example, supplying water, recycling wastewater, collecting, treating and recycling waste, supplying heating and cooling services, and generally optimizing the industrial processes used in their facilities.

Our operations are conducted primarily through four divisions, each of which specializes in a single business sector: Veolia Eau (Water), Veolia Énergie (Dalkia) (Energy Services), Veolia Propreté (Environmental Services) and Veolia Transport (Transportation). Through these divisions, we currently provide drinking water to more than 78 million people and treats sewer water for 53 million people in the world, treat nearly 66 million tons of waste, satisfy the energy requirements of hundreds of thousands of buildings for industrial, municipal and individual clients and transport approximately 2.7 billion passengers per year.  We strive to offer our clients the combined services of each of our four divisions, which are packaged either in the form of a single multi-service contract, or several individual contracts.

The following table breaks down our consolidated revenue for 2007 by geographic market and division, after elimination of all inter-company transactions.


(in millions of euro)*

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Total

Europe

8,190.5

6,889.4

6,566.1

4,291.8

25,937.8

of which:

 France

4,927.2

3,332.0

3,852.2

2,144.5

14,255.9

Other Europe

3,263.3

3,557.4

2,713.9

2,147.3

11,681.9

North America

582.5

1,449.0

19.3

738.9

2,789.7

Rest of the World

2,154.4

875.9

311.0

559.4

3,900.7

of which:

South America

104.5

163.1

143.3

28.5

439.4

Africa-Middle East

1,017.3

100.7

56.3

17.8

1,192.1

Asia-Pacific

1,032.6

612.1

111.4

513.1

2,269.2

Total

10,927.4

9,214.3

6,896.4

5,590.1

32,628.2

*

Revenue from ordinary activities under IFRS.




20



Back to Contents


The dates set forth below relating to new contracts we have won or renewed correspond to the date of announcement or signing of such contracts.   


Water

Through our water division, the lead company of which is Veolia Eau – CompagnieEau-Compagnie Générale des Eaux, we are the world’s leading provider of water and wastewater services for public authorities and industrial companies.1 In addition, Veolia Eau, through its subsidiary Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies, is thea world leader in the designconception of technological solutions and the construction of structures necessary for the performance of such services.

With 82,867 employees around the world1, Veolia Eau provides drinking water to more than 7895 million people, around the world,and supplies 5366 million people in the world with clean water, and operates more than 4,400 contracts.wastewater services.

As of December 31, 2009, Veolia Eau has a permanent presence95,789 employees around the world.2 The Water Division is present in 60more than sixty-six countries, principally in France for historical reasons, but also in the United Kingdom, Germany, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Romania. It is pursuing targeted growth in Russia, Armenia and Hungary. The Asia-Pacific region (China, South(mainly China, Korea, Japan and Australia) also remains an important development objective, followingwith the awardsigning of a number of significant contracts with municipal and industrial clients incustomers over the past several years. Veolia Eau also has a presence in the United States through its contracts for the operation and maintenance of water and wastewater treatment plants, including its contract with the ci tycities of Indianapolis.Indianapolis and Milwaukee. Finally, Veolia Eau has alsowe have established a presence in the Middle East and Africa, primarily in Morocco and Gabon.

Thanks to itsour coordination of a network of research centers in France and abroad, Veolia Eau has mastered numerous major technologies and tools within the water sector. As a result, Veolia Eau is therefore able to offer highly skilled services in the areas of sanitary protection, spillage reduction, productivity enhancement of water networks and plants and preservation of resources.

Given

1

Source: Global Water Intelligence (GWI), November 2009 and Pinsent Masons Water Yearbook 2009-2010.

2

Employees managed as of December 31, 2009, including 3,633 Proactiva employees allocated to its combination of aWater business.



18



Back to Contents


Combined with our strong local presence and more than 150 years of experience in providing services to public authorities and industrial clients,customers, Veolia Eau’s technical aptitude provides it with an importantexpertise is a significant advantage in the extremely competitive water services market.

Increased demand within the water services market has been substantially driven substantially by clientscustomers seeking to optimize the management of their existing resources, whether they be public authorities seeking to respond to the trend towards urbanization, or industrial clients.customers. New solutions, such as desalination (an example of which is the turnkey contract signed in 2007 to provide one of the largest sea water desalination plantsseawater, a sector where Veolia Eau recently excelled in the world in Saudi Arabia)Middle East, or the re-use of treated water, may also be needed depending onrepresent an individual client’s circumstances.appropriate response to specific situations.

The following table shows the consolidated revenue (revenue from ordinary activities under IFRS) and operating income of our water division,the Water Division, after elimination of all inter-company transactions.

Water*Water *

(in millions of euro)

2007

2006

Change
2007/2006

   
    

Revenue**

10,927.4

10,087.6

8.3%

Operating income

1,267.7

1,160.6

9.2%

    

*

Includes our share in the results of the water activities of Proactiva, our joint venture with FCC which operates principally in the water and environmental services in South America.

**

Revenue from ordinary activities under IFRS.


1  As of December 31, 2007, including Proactiva’s 1,939 employees who are active in water activities.



21



Back to Contents

(€ million)

2009

2008

Change

2009/2008

Revenue

12,555.9

12,557.9

0.0%

Operating income

1,164.3

1,198.5

-2.9%

*

Including Veolia Environnement’s share in the results of the water activities of Proactiva, Veolia Environnement’s joint venture with FCC.


Overview of Veolia Eau


Water Division

Veolia Eau manages municipal drinking water and/or wastewater services on five continents thanks tothrough a geographical organization withfeaturing a strong local presence. Contracts with public authorities are typically long-term and range from 10 to 20 years in length but may extendand potentially up to 50 years inunder certain circumstances. These contracts take various forms, all adaptedtailored to the needs and goals of the public authority, and may include outsourcing contracts, public-private partnerships, concessions, BOT (Build, Operate & Transfer) contracts, DBO (Design, Build & Operate) contracts and others. They are generally contracts that involve the operation, design or construction of installations, with the public authority usually remaining the owner of the assets (except in the United Kingdom) and the head ofretaining authority over water policy. Recent legislative changes have enabled usVeolia Environnemen t to integrate more elaborate mechanisms into ourits contracts toallowing it a llowing us to share inof the added value produced under the contract  (e.g., productivity(productivity gains, improvement in the level of services, efficiency criteria, etc.). Public authorities often rely on Veolia Eau to manage customer relations; it has implemented specificrelations and we are constantly improving the efficiency of our services and specific information systems in response, which it continuously strives to improve.  


systems. In certain countries where public authorities have sought to either to implement new water and wastewater treatment systems or to improve the functioning of existing ones, Veolia Eau also offers feasibility studies and technical assistance, which may include research plans, coordination and acceptance, network modeling and financial analysis.


Veolia Eau’s outsourcing Outsourcing contracts with industrial and commercial services customers generally last from 3have a term of three to 10ten years, although certain contracts have terms of up to 20twenty years.


Service Contracts with Public Authorities and Industrial ClientsCustomers

The main focus of our water business is onthe management of water and wastewater management services for public authorities and industrial clients.customers. Veolia Eau provides integrated services that cover the entire water cycle. Its activities include the management and operation of large-scale, customized drinking water plants, wastewater decontamination and recycling plants, drinking water distribution networks and wastewater collection networks. Veolia Eau also manages customer relations, providing billing services and call centers.


Veolia Eau and its subsidiaries have provided outsourced water services to public authorities in France and in the rest of the world for more than 150 years under long-term contracts adaptedtailored to local environments. Currently, Veolia Eau and its subsidiaries are attempting to capitalize on the worldwide trend towards delegated management of municipal drinking water and wastewater treatment services.


Veolia Eau continues to develop its service offeringsoffering for industrial clients usingcustomers, capitalizing on its local presence in variousmany areas and itsan adapted service organization. It has accordingly becomeorganization al structure. As a result, we are active withinin this market in France, the United Kingdom, Germany and the Czech Republic, as well as in Asia (South Korea and China in particular) and the United States. Through VE Industries, Veolia Eau also contributes to the development of our common service offerings, of our group, in particular in Europe, with VE Industries (as discussed further below).Europe.



19



Back to Contents


Engineering and Technological Solutions for the Treatment of Water

Through Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies, Veolia Eau is one of the world’s leading designers of technologicaldevelops technical solutions and ofdesigns/builds the construction of facilitiesinfrastructure necessary to provide water services on behalf of public authorities and industrial and commercial services clients.service sector customers. In addition, Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies designs, assembles, manufactures, installs and operates modular standardized and semi-standardized water and wastewater equipment and systems designed to treat water for municipal and industrial uses.uses, which is both reliable and high-performing. A local technical assistance network is available at all times for the upkeep, maintenance and after-salecustomer service of these installations.


Veolia Eau treats groundwater, surface water, brackish or seawater, wastewater and refined sludge. Thanks to the combination of physical, chemical orand biological treatments, Veolia Eau has developed a completecomprehensive range of specific solutions for the purification of water or the reduction or elimination of impurities in effluents. Veolia Eau’s recycle/The recycling/re-use systems installed by Veolia Eau provide customers with the ability to circulate part or all of their treated water back into plant processes, thereby reducing their water usage,consumption, operating costs and environmental damage.


Through Sade,SADE, Veolia Eau also designs, builds, renews and recovers urban and industrial drinking water and wastewater networks and conducts related workinfrastructure, in France and around the world. Sade’sSADE’s services cover each stage of the water cycle, from its collection to its release, and its public and industrial customers benefit from Sade’sSADE’s experience in this area.



Key factors

22The key factors that may influence Veolia Eau’s business are of a technical, contractual and economic nature. The key factors potentially impacting the “service contracts with public authorities and industrial customers” business are the following. From an economic point of view, we will be affected by trends in volumes billed and the ability to obtain price increases, within the planned time-period in line with our objectives. From a technical point of view, our ability to satisfy service commitments negotiated with the customer or regulator will have an impact. From a commercial point of view, we will be affected by our ability to renew existing contracts under satisfactory terms and conditions in a highly competitive environment.



BackIn contrast, the Engineering and Technological Solutions business is potentially affected, at an economic level, by the rate of projects launched by public authorities and certain major industrial companies, as trends in demand levels have a direct impact on the order book. Continued technological leadership in tender bids and the ability to Contents


manage constraints and master technical solutions in the performance of contracts are also determining factors. Finally, at a contractual level, rigor in the negotiation and performance of contracts are also key in this sector (particularly the ability to meet deadlines and cost budgets).

Description of Activities in 20072009


In 2007, Veolia Eau enjoyed several commercial successes, and its revenues increased by 8.3%activity levels remained relatively stable overall in 20072009, compared to 2006, thanks to a high level of contract renewal in France, sustained organic growth outside of France, in particular in Asia, and2008, but were marked by strong growth in China and the engineering andweakness of the construction businesssector, both in France and internationally.abroad. Veolia Eau didrevenue was not loseaffected by the loss of any significantmajor contracts in 2007 relative2009.

In 2008, the city of Paris announced its decision not to total revenuesrenew the delegated management contracts expiring at the end of 2009. The Paris contract represented €143 million in the water division.revenue in 2009 for Veolia Eau.

In France, Veolia Eau provides approximately 2425 million inhabitants with drinking water and 16 million with wastewater services. ContractsPublic service delegated management contracts renewed in 20072009 represent expectedestimated total cumulative revenuesrevenue of almost €920€614 million. AmongIn France, despite a highly competitive environment, Veolia Eau enjoyed several commercial successes. These included a new contract for the management of water and wastewater services for the town of Chaumont and concession arrangements for the City of Chartres wastewater treatment plant and the Roquebrune Cap Martin wastewater treatment plant. Other than the return of Paris water services to local public authority control, Veolia Eau renewed all major contracts that expired during the year. In the drinking water sector, the Roche-sur-Yon, Garrigues Campagne, Bergerac and La Vallette public authorities renewed their confi dence in Veolia. In the wastewater treatment sector, the contracts renewed, the most important were with the Nice Côte d’Azur area,Val Maubuée Authority in the city of Beauvais, the city of MaconParis region and the Intercommunal SyndicateCity of Nantes were successfully renewed.

We also continued our sustainable development policy launched in recent years, refining our contractual model with the Mâconnaise Area, which bring together the latest technical innovations in environmental protection.

Veolia Eau continues its development effortshelp of specific offerings, in order to further increase its service offeringsatisfy customer wishes and enable them to reach new clientsmeet their sustainable development objectives (biodiversity, carbon footprint, etc.). Finally, as in areas such as2008, the managementfall in unit consumption continued (0.6% fall in billed volume on 2008), despite relatively favorable weather conditions.

Activity contracted slightly in Europe, due mainly to a decrease in activity on completion of wastewater treatment plants, the management of mud storage, online availability of water consumption levels, managementconstruction work at sites in The Hague and maintenance of rainwater networks, the maintenance of non-collective wastewater installations, and the monitoring of swimming water, which are all services related to increasing awareness of the challenges of sustainable development.

In the rest of Europe, the EBRD has committed to invest up to €105 million in 2007, €90 million of which has been invested since 2007, to acquire 10% of Veolia Voda, a holding company for Veolia Eau’s businesses in Central and Eastern Europe, with the aim of increasing the role of the private sector in providing water conveyance and the purification of waste water, notably in Russia and the Ukraine.   

At the end of 2007, the International Finance Corporation (IFC), the private sector arm of the World Bank Group, and PROPARCO, the subsidiary of Agence Française de Développement in charge of financing private investments in developing countries, acquired shareholdings of 13.89% and 5.56%, respectively, in Veolia Eau AMI. Veolia Water AMI is a subsidiary of Veolia Eau and operates water, wastewater and electricity services in Africa, the Middle East and the Indian subcontinent. The aim of this holding company is to develop infrastructure to serve those populations who are without water and electricity in the urban areas of these regions.    

In the Middle East, in addition to the Jubail and Fujairah contracts, negotiations with the Sultanate of Oman led to the signing of a contract in January 2007, in partnership with National Power and Water, to build, finance and operate a reverse osmosis seawater desalination plant in Oman (with a capacity of 80,000 m3/day). The 22-year contract should represent estimated total consolidated revenue of €434 million, including the construction of the plant.Belfast.

In Asia, Veolia Eau won several contracts2009 was marked by the ramp-up of the Tianjin Shibei contract, further organic growth in Shenzhen and robust construction activity in Shanghai in the run-up to the World Expo2010 in China, (see below) and in Japan, where it won a three-year contract for the operation and maintenance of a water decontamination plant in Chiba, a suburb of Tokyo which has experienced significant growth.  In Australia, the new Sydney contract followed the contracts that were won in 2006 for consulting services to the State of Queensland to recycle water produced by treatment installations in the region of Brisbane in an effort to combat drought, and the design, construction and management of a desalination by reverse osmosis facility designed to sustain, in particular,while the Gold Coast.

Veolia Eau recorded solid earningsCoast and Sydney Desalination construction contracts came to an end in 2007 due to the good performance of existing contracts across all geographical areas and in all business segments.  This success was also due to the continued pursuit of measures to enhance productivity (including sharing of best practices and better use of information technology) and to the progress generated by the implementation of new technology during past years (including energy efficiency gains and return on installations and networks).


Australia.



2320



Back to Contents


Principal Contracts


The following table shows the principal contracts signed or renewed in 20072009 with either public authorities or industrial or commercial companiescompanies.1.  

Public Authority

authority
or

Company company
and Locationlocation thereof

Month of Signature
signature of Contract
contract

New Contract contract
or Renewalrenewal

Duration of Contract
term

Estimated Total Cumulative Revenue


cumulative revenue
(in euros)

Services Provided
provided

France

Public AuthoritiesFrance

     

City of Nice Côte d’Azur and its suburbs

December

Renewal

12 years

75 million

Operation of drinking water services for the Nice Côte d’Azur communities.

Beauvais

October

Renewal

12 years

38 million

Operation of drinking water services.

MâconChartres

June

RenewalNew

10


20 years

59156 million

Management of waterConcession arrangement to build and waste water services.operate a wastewater treatment plant

Roquebrune Cap Martin

June

New

20 years

50 million

Concession arrangement to build and operate a wastewater treatment plant

Europe (outside(excl. France)

     

Görlitz

(Germany)

January

Renewal

20 years / 7 years

310 million

Distribution of electricity and gas (20 years) and heat (7 years)

Burg

(Germany)

January

New

15 years

20 million

Management of water and wastewater services

Madrid

(Spain)

March

New

4 years

16 million

Operation of a wastewater treatment plant

Public AuthoritiesAsia

     

Campo Dalias (Spain)Chiba

(Japan)

March

New

3 years

35 million

Operation of a wastewater treatment plant

Sydney

(Australia)

May

NewRenewal

18 months (construction) + 154 years (operation)


(plus 3 years at the customer’s option)

7828 million (excl. option)


51 million (incl. option)

Design, construction, operation andNetwork maintenance of reverse osmosis water desalination plant.

CompaniesSouth America

     

Shell Green (United Kingdom)Petrobras

(Brazil)

September

New

30 months2 years

62123 million

ModernizationDesign and construction of wastewatera water treatment and reuse plant in Widnes in Cheshire.at Ipojuca

Asia

     

Public AuthoritiesMiddle-East

     

City of Lanzhou (Gansu province, China)Doha – Ashghal


(Qatar)

JanuaryMay

New

307 years

 (plus 3 years at customer’s option)

1.6 billion44 million

(excl. option)

61 million

(incl. option)

AcquisitionOperation and maintenance of 45% of the Lanzhou municipal water company, company holding the water management contract (3.2 million inhabitants).two wastewater treatment plants

Haikou (Hainan island, China)Tyr Sour

(Lebanon)

JuneAugust

New

305 years

776 million

Acquisition of 49% of the company managing the production and distribution of drinking water and the operation of a wastewater treatment plant (800,000 inhabitants).

Tianjin Shibei (China)

September

New

30 years

2.5 billion

Acquisition of 49% of the company managing the drinking water service (3 million inhabitants).

Sydney (Australia)

July

New

23 years
(20 years of operation)

54031 million

Construction and operation of a waterwastewater treatment plant through reverse osmosis with a capacity of treating 250,000 square meters per day.


1 Revenues expected under foreign contracts won during 2007 have been converted into euros at the rate of exchange prevailing on December 31, 2007 and represent the portion due to Veolia Eau under such contracts.   Accordingly, these amounts may differ from the amounts announced in earlier press releases.  



24



Back to Contents



Asia

     

CompaniesNorth America

     

Tianjin Soda (China)Duke Energy

September

New

27 years

492 million

Construction and operation of water treatment plant.

PTTPE (Thailand)

May

New

15 years

75 million

Construction and operation of water treatment plant.

Qingdao Soda (China)

June

New

25 years

33 million

Operation of a demineralization plant.

North America

Public Authorities

Tampa Bay (Florida)

April

New

16 years (13 years of operating)

108 million

Construction and operation concerning the extension of the surface water treatment plant of Tampa Bay.

Milwaukee (Wisconsin)

December

New

10 years

272 million

Management of the regional liquid waste management network of the Milwaukee region, and management of the production of Milorganite, fertilizer in granules produced by the drying of residual mud from the waste water purification plant.

Africa

Public Authorities

Mauritania

May

New

33 months

203 million

Construction of a drinking water supply line for the city of Nouakchott.

Middle East

Public Authorities

Jubail (Saudi Arabia)

June

New

34 months

647 million

Construction and operation of a seawater desalination plant, able to process 800,000 cubic meters of water per day for use by the city of Jubail and the Eastern province of Saudi Arabia.

Fujairah (UAE)(USA)

August

New

32 months3 years

54729 million

Construction of a seawater desalination plant.

Fujairah (UAE)

December

New

12 years

71 million

Operation and maintenance of seawaterwastewater treatment plant through reverse osmosis in Qidfa.for an electrical power plant


1

Estimated cumulative revenue represents Veolia Eau’s share in these contracts, converted into euros at the closing exchange rate as of December 31, 2009. As such, amounts indicated may differ from those reported in our press releases.




2521



Back to Contents


Principal Acquisitions and Divestitures in 20072009


The main acquisition and divestitures during the year include:

On November 28,

in France, the acquisition of Homerider, a specialist in radio meter reading;

in Europe, the buyout in Italy of the minority interest held by EMIT in SIBA, and the buyout (in April and July 2009) of a 51% stake in Stirling Water Seafield Holding (Edinburgh), increasing our holding in this project to 100%. In addition, the EBRD acquired an additional interest (6.88%) in the share capital of Veolia Voda, the holding company for water activities in Central and Eastern Europe, increasing its 10% stake in this company held since 2007 to 16.88%;

in Asia, the acquisition in China by Shenzhen Water Group (in which the Group holds a total direct and indirect interest of 25%) of five companies which manage drinking water services for a Shenzhen administrative district (Baoan);

on December 22, 2009, Veolia Eau acquiredreviewed certain economic aspects (financial restructuring) and the governance rules of its partnership with Mubadala Development Company in our operating activities in North Africa and the Middle East. The joint venture, which was formerly fully consolidated, is now under proportionate consolidation due to these changes. This operation resulted in a portion€189 million reduction in Group debt as of the unregulated activitiesDecember 31, 2009;

in Morocco, sale of Thames Water an additional 5% stake in Veolia Environmental Services Morocco to AAIF;

in the United Kingdom, principally for the provisionStates, sale of services and asset managementthree Enerserve entities operating in the waterCaribbean by Veolia Water North America.

Following the creation, acquisition or consolidation of 36 companies in 2009 and sewage sectors, somethe liquidation, divestiture or transfer of which are financed by19 companies, the Private Finance Initiative (PFI).

In addition, the biological treatment activitiesWater Division (excluding Proactiva) was composed of the Swedish company AnoxKaldnes were acquired and integrated in the second half of 2007.

In late 2007, Veolia Eau acquired the U.S. assets of one of the divisions of the Tetra Technologies Group. which is responsible for the treatment of waste in the petroleum sector.

Veolia Eau created, acquired or integrated 96728 companies during 2007, and liquidated or sold 48 companies. Asas of December 31, 2007, Veolia Eau’s group (excluding Proactiva) included 684 companies,2009 compared to 636711 in 2006.2008. The principal changes includedmain movements in the purchasescope of consolidation include the acquisition or creation of new companies with contractscarrying operating contacts that were effective as of the beginning of 2007.came into effect in 2009.

Environmental Services

Through our Veolia Propreté subsidiary, we are the number one reference in the environmental services division, Veolia Propreté,sector,1 where we have become the largest environmental services providerare involved in the world (in terms of revenue) in the area of waste collection, recycling and treatment. Veolia Propreté is the only company that handlesprocessing and handling of waste in all its forms and at all stages of activity.the waste cycle. Veolia Propreté manages liquid and solid waste and non-hazardous and hazardous waste (with the exception of nuclear waste) from collection to energy recovery, on behalf of both public authorities and industrial clients.  customers.

In 2007, Veolia Propreté once again reinforced its position by acquiring Sulo in Germany and TMT in Italy (now known as VSA Tecnitalia).

In 2007,As of December 31, 2009, Veolia Propreté employed 100,03285,600 people2 around the world,1 in approximately 35thirty-three countries. Veolia Propreté has partneredpartners with more thanover 750,000 industrial and commercial services clientssector customers23 and serves nearly 60more than 73 million inhabitants on behalf of public authorities.

During 2007,In 2009, Veolia Propreté estimates that it collected nearly 40.643 million tons of waste and treatedprocessed nearly 6662 million tons of waste (of which 61.8 million tons were non-hazardous household and industrial waste and 3.9 million tons were hazardous waste).waste. As of December 31, 2007,2009, Veolia Propreté managed approximately 796861 waste treatmentprocessing units.

The term of Veolia Propreté’s environmental services contracts usually depends uponon the nature of the services provided, applicable local regulations and the level of capital expenditure required under the contract.required. Collection contracts usually range from 1one to 5five years, in length, while treatmentwaste processing contracts can range from 1one year (for services provided on sites belonging to Veolia Propreté) to 30 years (for services involving the financing, construction, installation and operation of new waste processing infrastructure).

The following table shows the consolidated revenue

1

Sources: Internal studies and operating income of our environmental services division, after elimination of all inter-company transactions.Eurostat.

Environmental Services*2

(in millions of euro)

2007

2006

Change

2007/2006

Revenue**

9,214.3

7,462.9

23.5%

Operating income

803.5

648.3

23.9%

    

*

Includes our share in the results of the waste management activities of Proactiva, our joint venture with FCC which operates principally in the water and environmental services in South America.

**

Revenue from ordinary activities under IFRS.

1 AsEmployees managed as of December 31, 2007,2009, including Proactiva’s 6,8507,023 Proactiva employees who are active inallocated to its environmental services activities.   business.

2 3

The commercial figures providedappearing in this section (in terms of number of clients,customers, number of inhabitants served, tons of wastetonnages collected, etc.) do not take into account Proactiva’s activities,include Proactiva, unless otherwise indicated, but do take into account Sulo for the second half-year of 2007 and Tecnitalia for the fourth quarter of 2007.indicated.



2622



Back to Contents





The following table shows the consolidated revenue (revenue from ordinary activities under IFRS) and operating income of our Environmental Services Division, after elimination of inter-company transactions.

Environmental Services*

(in millions of euro)

2009

2008**

Change
2009/2008

    

Revenue

9,055.8

9,972.5

-9.2%

Operating income

453.8

265.2***

+71.1%

*

Includes Veolia Environnement’s share in the environmental service activities of Proactiva, Veolia Environnement’s joint venture with FCC.

**

In accordance with IFRS 5, Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations, results of operations of the Waste-to-Energy entities in the Environmental Services Division, partially divested in August 2009, are recorded as Net income from discontinued operations, in 2009 financial statements.

***

Includes €405.6 million of impairment charges in respect of goodwill and intangible assets of Environmental Services in Germany.


Overview of Environmental Services


Our Environmental Services Division, Veolia Propreté, furnishes environmentalwaste management and logistical services, which include waste collection, waste treatment,processing, cleaning of public spaces, offices and factories, maintenance of production equipment, treatment of polluted soil, decontamination, and management of waste discharge at industrial sites.


Veolia Propreté also Downstream, our Environmental Services Division conducts basic or more complex downstream waste treatmentprocessing operations in order to reduce pollution and transform waste into a resource. Thus, Veolia Propreté:


sorts and treatsprocesses waste in order to create new primaryraw materials, otherwise referredwhich we refer to as recycling or material recovery;

transforms organic material into compost to be returned to the soil, otherwise referredwhich we refer to as composting or agronomic recovery;

returnsprocesses waste to the natural environment in the least damaging way possible, through landfillinglandfill sites or incineration;

produces electricity or heat through landfilledusing waste in landfill sites or incinerated waste, otherwise referredincineration, which we refer to as waste-to-energy recovery.


The services referred to above fall into one of three large categories of activity conducted by Veolia Propreté:major business sectors: environmental services and logistics for local authorities and industrial companies, sorting and recycling of materials and waste recovery and treatmentprocessing through composting, incineration and landfilling.

The key factors that may influence the activities of Veolia Propreté are of a technical, contractual and economic nature. They mainly concern the following success factors:

a presence at all points of the waste value chain, from pre-collection through to processing and recovery, in an appropriate range of geographical areas at different stages of maturity, enabling the identification and control of innovative, tailored solutions for proposal to customers and setting us apart from the competition in the market;

the management of risks relating to the protection of the environment and the safety of individuals and installations (see the “Risk Factors” above and the section on “Environmental Regulations, Policies and Compliance,” below);

the quality of employee management in sectors which are often labor-intensive (limiting absenteeism and industrial action, developing skills and training);

the ability to innovate using new technologies (processing, rolling stock) and processes (sorting-recycling), founded on an effective technology, regulatory and competition watch system;

operating efficiency (purchases, sales, logistics, maintenance management) enabling the optimization of unit costs and the utilization rate of equipment, while ensuring the high level of quality required for products and services delivered.

investment management in certain capital-intensive activities (selectivity, risk analysis, installation size).



23



Back to Contents


the quality of contractual management for long-term contracts (major clauses, price review formulae, guarantees and deposits, etc.). (see the Risk Factors above)

management of economic and financial risks: volatility of raw material prices (fuel, materials sold such as paper and metals), customer risk, foreign exchange and interest rate risk. (see the Risk Factors above)

Environmental Services and Logistics for Local Authorities and Industrial Companies


Maintenance of Public Spaces and Urban Cleaning


Each day, Veolia Propreté provides urban cleaning services in a large number ofmany cities throughout the world, including London, Paris, Alexandria, RabatSingapore and Singapore.Dresden. Veolia Propreté’s services include also provides mechanized street cleaning and building facade treatment of building facades.


services.

Cleaning and Maintenance of Industrial Sites


Veolia Propreté provides cleaning services at the sites of its industrial and commercial services clients’ sites,service sector customers, including cleaning of offices and maintenance of production lines. In the commercial services sector, it provides these services in train stations, subway networks, airports, museums and commercial centers.


In the industrial sector, cleaning services extendare extended to food-processing plants, and heavy industry and high-tech sites, where Veolia Propreté offers specialized cleaning services (high pressure or extreme high pressure cleaning). Veolia Propreté also offers cryogenic cleaning, and reservoir cleaning services at refineries and petrochemical sites in particular.petro-chemical sites. Finally, Veolia Propreté has developed emergency services to treat site contamination uponin the occurrenceevent of an accident or other incident.


Liquid Waste Management


Through its specialized subsidiary SARP, Veolia Propreté provides liquid waste management services that consist primarily of pumping and transporting sewer network liquids and oil residues to treatment centers.


Veolia Propreté has developed liquid waste management procedures that emphasize environmental protection, such as the on-site collection and the recycling and reuse of water during the provisionprocessing of its liquid waste management services.waste. Used chemicals,oil, which areis hazardous tofor the environment, areis collected before treatmentprocessing and transferred to one ofre-refining by a Veolia Propreté’s subsidiaries subsidiary specializing in the management of hazardous waste.




27



Back to Contents


Soil Decontamination


Land redevelopment and the expansion of residential or commercialand business areas may occur in areaslead to the use of sites where the soil has been polluted through prior use. Veolia Propreté has specific techniques for treating each site,difficult sites, which include treating polluted soil and rehabilitating temporarily inactive industrial areas, cleaning up accidental spills and restoringbringing active industrial sites to be ininto compliance with applicable environmental regulations.


Collection


In 2007,2009, Veolia Propreté collected approximately 40.643 million tons of waste from private individuals, local authorities and commercial and industrial sites. More than 6073 million people around the world benefited from Veolia Propreté’s waste collection services.


Veolia Propreté collects household waste through door-to-door pickup or through pickup at designated drop-off sites, and collects commercial and non-hazardous industrial waste. It maintains the cleanliness of green spaces and carries away “green” waste such as dead leaves and grasses.


Veolia Propreté also collects hazardous waste on behalf of its commercialservice sector and industrial clients, including hospital waste, laboratory waste and oil residue (ships, gas stations and drilling platforms), as well as dispersed and diffused hazardous waste. In 2007, Veolia Propreté collected approximately 1.9 million tons of hazardous waste.


Veolia Propretéalso offers related services to its commercialservice sector and industrial clients,customers, such as preliminary studies of future waste collection needs and waste tracking after collection.


Transfer and Grouping of Waste


Waste of the same type is transported either to transfer stations in order to be carried in large capacity trucks, or to grouping centers where it is separated by type and then sorted before being sent to an adapted treatmentthe appropriate processing center. Hazardous waste is usually transported to specialized physico-chemical treatmentprocessing centers, recycling units, special industrial waste incineration units or landfillslandfill sites designed to receive inert hazardous waste.



24



Back to Contents


Sorting and Recycling of Materials


Veolia Propreté treatsprocesses waste with a view towardsto reintroducing such waste into the industrial production cycle. Veolia Propreté's’s recycling activities generally involve the selective collection of paper, cardboard, glass, plastic, wood and metal that customers either separate into different containers or mix with other recyclable materials.


Veolia Propreté received approximately 910.3 million tons of solid waste at its 307352 sorting and recycling units in 2007,2009, of which 6.17.7 million tons were recovered, including 2.8 million tons of paper.recovered. Veolia Propreté also provides decomposition services for complex waste products at specialized treatment centers, such as electric and electronic products and fluorescent lamps. Veolia Propreté works upstream in partnership with upstream industrial clientscustomers and with our CREED research center in order to develop new recycling activities. Veolia Propreté sellsRecycled material is sold or distributes recycled materialdistributed to intermediaries or directly to industrial and commercial services clients.


customers.

Waste Recovery and Treatment through Composting, Incineration and Landfilling


In 2007,2009, Veolia Propreté treatedprocessed nearly 6662 million tons of waste in its sorting and recycling centers, composting units, hazardous waste treatment centers, incineration units and landfills.landfill sites.


Composting and Recovery of Organic Material from Fermentable Waste


Veolia Propreté and Veolia Eau work together to recover sludge from wastewater treatment plants. In 2007,At its 122 composting units, Veolia Propreté recovered almost 2.3 million tons of waste at its 114 composting units. 235,000 tons ofprocesses urban and industrial sludge, were reintegrated by Veolia Propretépart of which is then re-introduced into the agricultural cycle through manureland spreading, with a related waste traceabilitytracking service offering.offered.




28



Back to Contents


Incineration and Waste-to-Energy and Incineration


Recovery

Veolia Propreté treats approximately 11.4 million tons of non-hazardous solid waste (consisting mainly of urban waste) per year at its 78operates seventy-nine waste-to-energy recovery and incineration plants.plants, which process non-hazardous solid waste (mainly urban waste). Energy is generated from the heat created by incinerating waste at these plants. Veolia Propreté uses this energy to supply district thermalurban heating networks or for salessells it to electricity providers.


Landfilling and EnergyWaste-to-Energy Recovery from Waste


In 2007,2009, Veolia Propreté treated approximately 38.4 million tons ofhad 147 non-hazardous waste in 150 landfills.landfill sites. Veolia Propreté has developed the expertise to treatprocess waste through methods that reduce emissions of liquid and gas pollutants. Veolia Propreté currently has 160 landfills that accept or have accepted biodegradable waste and that are equipped to retrieve and treat biogas emissions from the anaerobic fermentation of waste, of which 76 landfills85 landfill sites have recovery systems to transform biogas emissions into alternative energies.


TreatmentProcessing of Hazardous Waste


In 2007,2009, Veolia Propreté treated 3.9 million tons of hazardous waste, of which 1.08 million tons were incinerated in 22had 24 incineration units for specialized industrial waste, 759,000 tons were landfilled in70 processing units using physico-chemical and stabilization methods, 14 class 1 landfillslandfill sites and 1.71 million tons were treated in 61 units by physico-chemical or stabilization methods.  The remaining 480,000 tons were treated in 3536 specialized recycling centers.


The principal methods used for treatingprocessing industrial hazardous waste are incineration (for organic liquid waste, salt-water and sludge), solvent recycling, waste stabilization followed by treatment in specially designed landfills,processing at specially-designed landfill sites, and physico-chemical treatmentprocessing of inorganic liquid waste.


Through its specialized subsidiaries, SARP Industries and VES Technical Solutions (in the United States), Veolia Propreté has a worldwide network of experts, enablingwhich has helped it to become one of the currenta world leadersleader in treating,processing, recycling and recovering hazardous waste.


Description of Activities in 2007



In 2007, Veolia Propreté’s revenues increased by 23.5% compared to 2006. Excluding exchange rate effects and the effect of acquisitions and divestitures, internal growth was 7.5%.  In France, revenue increased by 7.1% in 2007 (or 6.6% at constant scope) as a result of strong price increases for recycled materials (paper, metals), higher tonnages in the collection and sorting-recycling of solid waste, waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEE) operations and the treatment of polluted soils, the increase in tonnages to landfills and the good level of business activity at incineration plants.  In the United Kingdom, revenues grew 56.4%, or 7.9% for internal growth at constant scope as a result of the expansion of existing integrated contracts (East Sussex and Nottinghamshire) and industrial services (in particular in the petroleum sector).  In the rest of Europe, revenues gr ew 21.6%, or 8.4% at constant scope, driven particularly by momentum in Norway and Denmark.  In North America, organic growth was significant as a result of increased fees relating to solid waste, the Marine Services businesses, the new Pinellas contract and the treatment of military waste at Port Arthur.  South America benefited from short-term contracts in the chemical and petroleum sectors that allowed it to experience marked growth.  A limited number of significant contracts were lost in 2007:  Chennai in India (cleaning), Canca in France (collection in Nice), and Solihull Borough in the United Kingdom (collection).  Among the significant developments in 2007 were the following:

In France, Veolia Propreté reinforced its recycling activities through the acquisition of the Bartin Recycling Group, number 3 in France in the business of recycling and reuse of scrap-metal and metals.  The development of D3E activities continued.  A new treatment unit for hydrocarbons and mineral liquid waste, Hydropale, was opened in Dunkirk.  A ship dismantling unit was created in Bordeaux.  In addition, the Polynesian businesses were sold.

In the United Kingdom, Veolia Propreté, while managing the acquisition and integration of Cleanaway UK, signed a new 27-year PFI (“Private Finance Initiative”) contract for the integrated management of household waste in the county of Shropshire, representing estimated total cumulative revenue of more than €1 billion.



2925



Back to Contents


Description of Activities in 2009

In Europe,2009, the Environmental Services Division reported a fall in revenue, about half of which was attributable to a fall in the volume and price of materials sold (mainly paper, cardboard and metals). Prices had reached an all-time high in the second quarter of 2008, before collapsing at the end of 2008, after which they commenced a partial and progressive recovery (except ferrous metal). In addition, the economic crisis hit industry-related activities hard (collection and processing of industrial waste, industrial services), with activity levels stabilizing but not recovering in the final months of 2009. In this context, Veolia Propreté continuedrapidly implemented a tailored plan to reinforce its commercial position withinadjust costs to activity levels and introduce efficiency measures.

In France, in addition to the negative impact of the fall in the price of materials sold (paper, cardboard and metal), the drop in revenue was mainly due to the decrease in non-hazardous and hazardous waste volumes collected and processed. In the incineration business, the kiln void-filling policy and related energy authorization sectors through the acquisitiongood performance of TMTincinerators enabled revenue growth, further driven by the recent Cenon contract signed at the end of 2008. Moderate price increases were achieved in Italy.a low-inflation context, marked by a fall in fuel prices. In Germany, the acquisitionsorting-recycling business, the Ludres high-performance materials recovery facility inaugurated in June 2009, gradually ramped-up activity. Finally, at the end of Sulo enabled Veolia Propreté to reinforce its role2009, the first French pilot unit for the production of biofuel from biogas produced by non-hazardous waste in landfill sites, commenced activity in the recycling sectorGreater Paris region.

In the United Kingdom, revenue fell due to a decrease in Europeindustrial and commercial waste collection and landfill volumes, a downturn in industrial services and the reuseloss of recycled material, especially paper.local authority waste collection contracts (such as the Liverpool contract at the end of 2008). Price increases in the collection and landfill sector helped limit the decrease in revenue. Internal growth also benefited from the new 20-year PFI contract signed in May 2009 with the Merseyside Waste Disposal Authority and the full year impact of the recently signed Southwark and West Berkshire contracts.

In Revenue fell more significantly in Germany, mainly due to the fall in paper and cardboard prices and the decrease in non-hazardous industrial waste volumes collected.

North America, Veolia Propreté reinforced its position withinAmerican revenue fell due to the decrease in industrial and commercial waste collection and landfill volumes, partially offset by the efficiency of price increase measures. Revenue was also affected by the impact of the economic crisis on the industrial services sector, winning severaland hazardous waste sectors. Major contracts lost in 2009 include the waste collection and processing contracts for the maintenanceNew York City boroughs of Manhattan and industrial cleaning of oil rigs inQueens, the Gulf of Mexico following the expansion of a fleet of specialized boats for this marine branch.  In early 2007, Veolia Propreté won a 17-year contract for the operationmaintenance of green areas in Birmingham, Alabama, and the energy recycling unit in Pinellas County (Florida), one of the largest incineration unitsAirbus industrial services contract in the United States.Kingdom. These contracts represented total estimated annual revenue of €26 million.

In Asia, Veolia Propreté signed a 29-year concession agreement for the construction and operation of a new household waste storage facility for the city of Jiujiang in China.  A 28-year concession agreement for the operation of a medical waste incineration unit was also signed with the city of Foshan.  Lastly, the repurchased Cleanaway businesses were integrated in 2007.



26



Back to Contents


Principal Contracts


in 2009

The following table shows the principal contracts signed or renewed in 20072009 with either public authorities or industrial or commercial companiesservice sector companies.1.


Public Authority

authority or

Company company and Locationlocation thereof

Month of Signaturesignature of Contractcontract

New Contractcontract or Renewalrenewal

Duration of Contract term

Estimated Total Cumulative Revenue

cumulative revenue
(in euros)

Services Providedprovided

France

Public AuthoritiesFrance

     

SIOM (Chevreuse)COBAN Atlantique (Arcachon basin)

JuneMay

New

5 years

2518 million

Operation and maintenanceCollection of the household waste incineration plant of Villejust.and equivalent

SMICTOM (Fontainebleau)Chevreuse Valley SIOM

November

Renewal

8 years

72 million

Collection of household waste and equivalent

Limoges City Conurbation

June

Renewal

76 years

2437 million

Transfer, transport and treatmentCollection of household waste and hospital waste.equivalent

LimogesRouen Conurbation

DecemberOctober

Renewal

106 years

4029 million

Operation and maintenanceCollection of the household waste incineration plantand equivalent

Val de France Conurbation

November

Renewal

8 years

24.5 million

Collection of Limoges.household waste and equivalent

Azur Provence Conurbation

October

Renewal

5 years

23 million

Collection of household waste and equivalent

Nevers Conurbation

February

New

20 years

17.5 million

Construction and operation of a drop-off center for professionals

CompaniesEurope (excl. France)

     

ArcelorMittalMerseyside Waste Disposal Authority (United Kingdom)

JuneMay

New

520 years

21720 million

SupplyIntegrated comprehensive waste management contract

North America

Seminole County (Florida)

November

New

8 years

16 million

Collection of energy to the ArcelorMittal site, via the Arc-en-Ciel household waste incineration plant (Nantes).and equivalent

Asia – Pacific

Hong-Kong Special Administrative Region

November

Renewal

10 years

174 million

Operation and maintenance of a hazardous waste treatment facility

North Africa

Nador (Morocco)

February

New

7 years

18 million

Collection of household waste and equivalent and urban cleaning services



1

Revenues expected under foreignthe contracts won during 2007in 2009 have been converted into euros at the closing exchange rate as of exchange prevailing on December 31, 20072009 and represent the portion due to Veolia Propreté under such contracts. Accordingly, these amounts may differ from the amounts announced in earlier Group press releases.



30

27



Back to Contents





Europe

(outside France)

Public Authorities

Shropshire (United Kingdom)

September

New

27 years

1,030 million

Contract integrating the global treatment of waste.

Bautzen (Germany)

July

Renewal

7 years

17 million

Collection of municipal waste, sorting recycling and composting.

North America

Public Authorities

Pinellas (Florida)

January

New

17 years

356 million

Operation and maintenance of household waste incineration plant.

Asia-Pacific

Public Authorities

Jiujiang (China)

August

New

30 years

92 million

Construction and operation of Jiujiang landfill.

Singapore

November

Renewal

5 years

28 million

Urban cleaning.

Main Acquisitions and Divestitures in 20072009


OnIn July 2, 2007,2009, an agreement was signed with Covanta Holding Corporation for the sale of Montenay International, the portfolio of North American waste-to-energy contracts. This divestiture encompasses the management and maintenance contracts for seven sites. The transaction was finalized in 2009, with the exception of one site, the sale of which was completed in February 2010. In August 2009, Veolia Propreté finalized the acquisition of Sulo for an enterprise value of €1,450 million, which significantly reinforced its position in the waste management sector in Germany and in Eastern Europe.  Sulo was the second largest operator of waste management in Germany.  It is a leading specialist in paper and plastic recycling and has a high level of expertise in the areas of sorting and organic reuse.  Sulo is also a leader in Eastern Europe and in the Baltic states.  Sulo’s Environmental Technologies divisionNettoyage et Multiservices (VPNM) was sold to Plastic Omniumthe TFN Group. VPNM provides site cleaning services and waste sorting and collection services at sites mainly located in July 2007 for an enterprise value of €142 million.

In addition, on October 3, 2007, Veolia Propreté finalized the acquisition of 75%France. These transactions form part of the share capital of TMT (which has since been renamed VES Tecnitalia),multi-year divestiture program announced by the former subsidiary of Termomeccanica Ecologia in Italy.  Tecnitalia isGroup on March 6, 2009.

Following the leading private thermal waste treatment provider in the Italian market.  It operates ten treatment installations, including four thermal treatment installations, and has numerous contracts, as well as several factories that are currently under construction.

Other less significant acquisitions occurred in 2007.  They are expected to increase Veolia Propreté’s treatment and recycling capacities in Europe, Northern America and in Asia.

Taking into account all formations, acquisitions and integrations of companies (a total of 202) and liquidations, sales, and mergers (a total of 74), the scope ofcreation, acquisition or consolidation of Veolia Propreté20 companies in 2009 and the liquidation, divestiture or transfer of 94 companies, the Environmental Services Division (excluding Proactiva) included 753comprised 692 companies atas of December 31, 2007,2009, compared to 625766 in 2006.  2008.




31



Back to Contents


Energy Services

Our energy services division conducts itsWe conduct our Energy Services activities through Dalkia, thea leading European provider of energy servicesEnergy Services to companies and municipalities.public authorities. Dalkia provides services relating to heating and cooling networks, decentralized energy production, thermal and multi-technical systems, industrial utilities, installation and maintenance of production equipment, integrated facilities management and street lighting. It seeks to leverageelectrical services on public streets and roads. We seize opportunities foroffered by the development of the energy and greenhouse gas emission reduction markets. Dalkia seeks to partnerjoins forces with its clients,customers, helping them optimize their energy purchases and improve the efficiency of their installations (both in terms of cost and atmospheric emissions).

In 2007,As of December 31, 2009, Dalkia had 54,37552,557 employees in 42 countries around the world. Dalkia is present in almost 40 countries, primarilyworld and particularly in Europe.

The following table shows the consolidated revenue (revenue from ordinary activities under IFRS) and operating income of our energy services division,Energy Services Division, after elimination of all inter-company transactions.

Energy Services

(in millions of euro)

2009

2008**

Change
2009/2008

    

Revenue*

7,078.6

7,446.3

-4.9%

Operating income*

415.5

434.4

-4.4%

*

Including our share of revenue and operating income in industrial multi-service entities.

**

In accordance with IFRS 5, Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations, the results of operations from the Clemessy and Crystal entities and renewable energy activities in the Energy Services Division, respectively divested in December 2008 and in the process of divestiture in 2009, are recorded as Net income from discontinued operations, in the 2009 financial statements.


(in millions of euro)

2007

2006

Change

2007/2006

    

Revenue*

6,896.4

6,118.4

12.7%

Operating income

398.7

377.7

5.6%

    

*

Revenue from ordinary activities under IFRS.



Overview of Energy Services


Dalkia’s business is currently facing three major challenges:

global warming and the need to reduce carbon dioxide emissions;

the increase in the pricesprice of fossil fuels and their eventual scarcity; and

growing urban developmentexpansion and the related industrial development.

Dalkia’s activity focusesThis business is focused on optimal energy management.management, and Dalkia has progressively establishedset up a range of activities linked to energy management, including heating and cooling systems,networks, decentralized energy production, thermal and multi-technical services, industrial utilities, installation and maintenance of production equipment, integrated facilities management and electrical services on public streets and roads. The health care sector is particularly importantalso of strategic importance to Dalkia: in 2007, it won landmark contracts in that sector, such as Santa Casa de Misericordia in Brazil.Dalkia.

Dalkia provides energy management services to public and private clientscustomers with whom it has formedwhich we form long-term partnerships. Dalkia’s managementManagement contracts for the operation of urban heating or cooling systemsnetworks are typically long-term, lasting up to 25 or 30 years, while its contracts for the operation of thermal and multi-technical installations for public or private clientscustomer may lasthave terms of up to 16 years. Contracts to provide industrial utilities services generally have shorter terms (6(six to 7seven years on average), while contracts in the facilities management sector generally last 3have terms of three to 5five years.

When

28



Back to Contents


Whenever possible, Dalkia offers solutions to its clients solutions utilizingcustomers using renewable or alternative energy sources such as geothermal energy, biomass (organic material), solar energy (thermal, photovoltaic, solar concentration), heat recovered from household waste incineration, “process” heat (heat produced by industrial processes) and thermal energy produced by co-generation projects. A combination of energyEnergy sources may also be selected in orderare combined, wherever possible, to take advantage of the complementary nature of each source. For instance,In the biomass sector, Dalkia considerably stepped-up its development in 2007 Dalkia acquired PannonPower,2009 by virtue of the leading biomass plant in Hungary.innovative services we propose to local authorities.

Heating and Cooling Networks

Dalkia is one of Europe’s leading operators of large “district”urban heating and cooling networks. Dalkia currently manages 700810 urban and district heating and cooling networks worldwide, particularly in the United States, France, the United Kingdom, Italy, Germany, Eastern and Central Europe and the Baltic states. Dalkia does not necessarily own the networks it operates, and in some cases, public authorities own the networks and delegate to Dalkia the responsibility of managing, maintaining and repairing them.  The networks operated by Dalkia provide heating, sanitary hot water and air conditioning to a wide varietyrange of public and private facilities, including schools, health centers, office buildings and residences.



32



Back to Contents


Thermal and Multi-Technical Services


Thermal services consist of operating heating, sanitary hot water and air conditioning systems to provide comfortable living and working environments, as well as improving the operation of existing systems to optimize their efficiency. Dalkia provides public, industrial and commercial services clientsservice sector customers with integrated energy services which includeincluding plant design, construction and improvement, energy supply, and plant management and maintenance. Dalkia provides customers with a largewide range of technical services and implements new service offerings to satisfy demands for improved energy efficiency. It manages more than 100,000115,000 energy plants throughout the world.


Industrial Utilities, Installation and Maintenance of Production Equipment


Dalkia has become a leading provider of industrial utilities services in Europe. ItEurope and has developed expertise regardingin the analysis of industrial processes, the enhancement of productivity and the operation, maintenance and servicingrepair of equipment.


Dalkia provides services at approximately 4,100 industrial sites.

Integrated Facilities Management


Facilities management contracts integrate into one global servicecombine a range of services, in a single comprehensive service relationship, from the maintenance of thermal, electrical and mechanical equipment maintenance to logistics. AsAccordingly, the various needs of customers are satisfied by a result, one company can meet a client’s different needs.single company. Dalkia provides facilities management services for its industrial or commercial services clients (such as businessand service sector customers (business premises, corporate offices, or health establishment sites.institutions, etc.).


, covering a total surface area of over 100 million square meters.

Street Lighting Services


Citélum, a subsidiary of Dalkia, has earned a worldwide reputation for the management of urban street lighting, the regulation of urban traffic and the lighting of monuments and other structures. Citélum operates and maintains lighting in a number of cities in France and abroad, and provides artistic lighting services at important architectural works and sites. 2007 saw the opening of an establishment in Chile where Citélum won an operation-maintenance contract for public lighting in the city of Santiago de Chile.  Citélum was also awarded a contract by the city of Syracuse in Sicily and also signed a Public-Private Partnership (PPP) contract with the city of Agde.


Services to Individuals


Together with Veolia Eau, Dalkia provides residential services to private individuals and cooperative housing customers through Proxiserve, a joint subsidiary of Dalkia and Veolia Eau,(energy/water services), including the maintenance of heating air conditioningsystems, plumbing and plumbing systemsrenewable energy services and meter-reading services. The activities of the Energy Services Division may be influenced by the following key factors, which are primarily of a technical, contractual or economic origin:

contract management, enabling the identification of risks borne by the Company and those borne by our customers. Contract management takes account of necessary regulatory developments, which are monitored by the Division, and the implementation of a research and development program, enabling further improvements to our performance and competitive advantage (see Risk Factors above);

procurement management: primarily purchases of raw materials, to optimize costs and secure fuel supplies for the installations we manage (see Risk Factors above).

environmental protection: optimization of energy efficiency, control of atmospheric emissions and a renewable energies-based offering (see Risk Factors, above, and Environmental Regulations, Policies and Compliance below)



29



Back to Contents


Description of Activities in 2007


2009

In 2007, Dalkia increased2009, the Energy Services Division reported a slight fall in revenue. This decrease was mainly due to a fall in energy prices.

2009 was marked by the ongoing refocusing of division activities on its revenues by 12.7% comparedcore business, which is the production and distribution of energy and the management of energy services. This led to 2006.  These results were the resultdivestiture of commercial growth and significant international expansion (particularly in central Europe andthe facilities management business in the Asia Pacific region), despite extremely mild winter weatherUnited Kingdom (see “Main acquisitions and divestitures in early 2007.2009” below).

In France, despite the commercial slowdown, Dalkia France renewed 80%close to 86% of its contracts that were dueexpired during the year.

The large number of new contracts and the development of contracts in portfolio, at a rate over twice that of erosion, enabled the Division to expire during 2007.  Contracts that weregrow its business portfolio. Overall, contracts not renewed in 2009 represent less than 1% of Dalkia revenue in France.

Major contracts lost includedin 2009 include the paper mills of the Gorge region due tocontract with Alstom Power Turbomachines DTV in Belfort. In addition, following the closure of its Etang de Berre site, Cabot France terminated early its thermoelectric power plant management contract, representing cumulative lost revenue for Dalkia over the site,contract term estimated at approximately €80 million.

2009 was also marked by the commissioning of the largest biomass power plant connected to a heating network of a section of Bourges, thePalais des Congrèsin Nice,Cergy Pontoise (Val d’Oise) and the ONERA in Chatillon.  These unrenewed contracts represented approximately 2%significant development of Dalkia’s revenues.  the heat distribution network business (creation, extension and renewal activities). Furthermore, the first generation of cogeneration installations that are about to reach the end of their life and numerous contract renewals were recorded after complete overhaul of the equipment.

In addition to the contractsFinally, Dalkia signed in 2007, which appear in the table below, in October 2007 Dalkia beganits first energy performance contract, following the implementation of a heatthe “Grenelle 1” recommendations.

In Central Europe, commercial activities performed well. New contracts signed during the year (representing approximately €51 million of estimated cumulative revenue) enabled Dalkia to maintain activity at 2008 levels and electricity supply contract foroffset the a bio-ethanol production plantnegative impacts of the economic crisis and exchange rates. Some 80% of contracts expiring during the year were renewed.

Major contracts were also signed during the year in Usti Nad Laben,Mexico in the Czech Republic. This contract, signedhealth sector, and in April 2006, represents estimated revenueItaly and Portugal under public private partnerships. Conversely, the installation business suffered the full effects of €67.7 million overthe economic crisis in Spain, Portugal, Italy and Israel, reporting a periodsignificant slowdown.

The main developments in North America concerned the acquisition of 10 years.


the Portland cooling network and the acquisition of NFL (National Football League) assets.



3330



Back to Contents


Principal Contracts in 20072009


The following table shows the principal contracts signed or renewed in 20072009 with either public authorities or industrial or commercial companiescompanies.1.

Public Authority

authority or

Company company and Locationlocation thereof

Month
of Signature signature
of Contract or of Renewalcontract

New Contract contract
or Renewalrenewal

Duration of Contract
term

Estimated Total Cumulative Revenue


cumulative
revenue
(in euros)

Services Providedprovided

France

Public/Local AuthoritiesFrance

     

LilleMarne La Vallée/ Val Maubuée (77)

DecemberMay

Renewal

824 years

5


82 million

Management of 282 communal buildings in Lille: schools, cultural, social and administrative centers. Heating network using geothermal energy

VandoeuvreCity of Plaisir (78)

MarchFebruary

Extension

15 years

69 million

Heating network

City of Roubaix (59)

July

Renewal

24 years

196 million

Heating network

City of Belfort (90)

May

Renewal

12 years

22 million

Glacis du Château district heating network in Belfort

City of Ales (30)

October

New

20 years

6.13544 million

Management of heating network.Heating network

VémarsCity of Lyon (69)

June

Renewal

12 years

30 million

La Duchère heating network

City of Poitiers (86)

July

NewRenewal

2415 years

3.872 million

Sustainable urban development project: commercial, industrial Couronneries, Touffenet and living zone. Private biomass and wood-energy electricity andSt Éloi district heating network.networks.

Construction of a biomass-powered heating plant

City of Limoges (87)

February

Extension

10 years

154 million

Construction of a biomass-powered heating plant

SFR

July

Renewal

3 years

105 million

“Network life” maintenance contract – geographical extension

Industrial and Commercial Services  Europe (excl. France)

     

Tour Granite, La DefenseTERSA Tractament i Seleccio de Residus SA (Spain)

December

New



30 years



492 million

Heating and cooling network for the Marina district, Barcelona – Multi-energy (gas, biomass, photovoltaic)

City of Madrid (Spain)

December

New

4 years

4.9522 million

Management of the new Société Générale Granite tower (70,000 m², 4,500 working stations, label HQE).Public lighting maintenance

RestCity of World (outside France)Hamburg (Germany)

September

New

 10 years

83 million

Production and distribution of heat generated using renewable energies for the HafenCity district

Santa Maria della misericordia University Hospital, Udine

(Italy)

October

New

30 years

394 million

Heating network and facilities management and thermal and multi-technical services – hospital PPP

Public/Local AuthoritiesLatin America

     

Jiamusi, ChinaSecretario de Salud del Estado de Mexico Zumpango (Mexico)

AprilJuly

New

2523 years

1 billion68 million

Management of the leading heating network in China: 250,000 inhabitants, 5.5 million square meters of commercial and municipal buildings.Facilities management – hospital PPP

Industrial and Commercial Services  North America

     

Setra, SwedenVenetian Group

(USA)

MarchFebruary

NewRenewal

1510 years

35.830 million

Construction and operation of a biofuel boiler providing hot water to a sawmill.

Bahrain Bay, Bahrain

March

New

25 years

215 million

Design, construction and management of a cooling network for a real estate project in Bahrain Bay.

Santa Casa de Misericordia Hospita, Brazil

May

New

15 years

186 million

Providing multi-technical services, management of utilities, managementO&M of the subcontracting of hospital security and catering services.Venetian Casino in Las Vegas


1

Revenues expected under foreignthe contracts won during 2007in 2009 have been converted into euros at the closing exchange rate as of exchange prevailing on December 31, 20072009 and represent the portion due to Dalkia, including Veolia Energy North America Holding, under such contracts. Accordingly, these amounts may differ from the amounts announced in earlier Group press releases.



3431



Back to Contents


Acquisitions and Divestitures in 20072009


In 2007,2009, Dalkia expandedcontinued its expansion in central EuropeFrance and abroad, through various acquisitions including, among others, PannonPowerand major projects and, in Hungary, whose central unit supplies the second largest heating network in the country; Rekotak in Slovakia, which manages thermal plants in a section of Bratislava under a 29-year contract, and the operator of the urban heating network and heat and electricity production of Varna, the third-largest city in Bulgaria.

In China, throughparticular, the acquisition of a majority stake in YangGuang, Dalkia took over the construction and operation project relating to the “South West” heating network of the city of Harbin, theentire share capital of Digismart in Estonia in the Heilongjiang province in northeast China, which has 9.5 million inhabitants.first quarter.

At the end of 2007, our energy services division expanded to the United States through its acquisition of Thermal North America Inc., which has the leading portfolio of heating and cooling networksIn addition, activity in the United States.Kingdom was refocused on energy businesses, with the divestiture of the Facilities Management businesses of DETS and Pakersell. This transaction was completed in August 2009.

In total, over the course of 2007, Dalkia formed2009, the Energy Services Division consolidated or purchased 71forty-seven companies, and sold, liquidated or merged 19twenty-nine companies. As a result, at December 31, 2007, Dalkiait held 469547 consolidated companies, including 242328 foreign companies.


companies, as of December 31, 2009, compared to a total of 528 consolidated companies as of December 31, 2008.

Transportation

Through our transportation division,Transportation Division, Veolia Transport, we are thea leading private operator of public ground transportation in Europe.1 Veolia Transport operates road and rail passenger transportation networks under contracts withservices on behalf of national, regional and local transit authorities. Veolia Transport has

We have been managing and operating urban, regional and inter-regional road and rail networks and maritime transport for more than a century, having won itsour first tramway concessions at the end of the 19th19th century.

Veolia Transport estimates that the worldwide transportation market currently stands at €460represents revenue of €340 billion, of which only 15%31%, or approximately €70€105 billion, is currently open to competition. TheEurope and North America are expected to account for nearly two-thirds of the growth potential over the next five years, with market expansion that could be significant between 2010 and 2015. Asia, particularly China, accounts for a substantial portion of new emerging markets and the current opening of transportation markets over the past several years has been particularly significant in Europe, but has occurred on other continents as well.is evidenced by a recent wave of calls for tender.

Moreover, the worldwideglobal trend of population movement towards urban areasgreater urbanization automatically increases the need for mass transportation services, therebythus strengthening the market potential in areas that we seek to service. Veolia Transport, seeksalongside the other Divisions of the Group, represents a major and steady contributor to service.our integrated environmental services offering.

At the endAs of 2007,December 31, 2009, Veolia Transport had 81,53277,591 employees around the world.  It hasworld and a presence in more than 30 countries, andtwenty-seven countries. It conducts its activitybusiness mainly in Europe, North America and Australia.Asia. While continuing to strengthen its position in France and the French overseas departments and territories, Veolia Transport also has a strong presence outside of France, as well, where it earns approximately 60.6%60% of its revenues.revenue. In 2007,2009, Veolia Transport pursuedcontinued its growth in North America, Asia and Europe.

Veolia Transport estimates that it provided transportation to more than 2.7 billion travelers in 2006, and that it managed contracts with approximately 5,000 public authorities.

The following table shows the consolidated revenue (revenue from ordinary activities under IFRS) and operating income of our transportation division,the Transportation Division, after elimination of all inter-company transactions.

TransportationTransportation*

(in millions of euro)

2007

2006

Change

2007/2006

    

Revenue*

5,590.1

4,951.5

12.9%

Operating income

130.3

13.6**

858.1%

    

*

Revenue from ordinary activities under IFRS.

**

Includes the impact of an €86.5 million impairment charge relating to certain German activities.

(in millions of euro)

2009

2008

Change
2009/2008

    

Revenue

5,860.7

5,788.1

+1.3%

Operating income**

152.9

170.5

-10.3%

*

In accordance with IFRS 5, Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations, the results of operations of the Freight business entities in the Transportation Division, divested in December 2009, and UK Transportation activities in the process of divestiture in December 2009, are grouped together in a separate line, Net income from discontinued operations, in the 2009 financial statements.

**

The 2008 figure includes badwill resulting from our purchase of minority interests in SNCM. See “Item 5 Operating and Financial Review and Prospects”, below.



1

Sources: annual reports of main competitors and internal studies.



3532



Back to Contents



Overview of Transportation


Veolia Transport primarilymainly operates road and rail passenger transportation networks under contracts won throughand regular services in accordance with public bidding processes initiated by various public authorities.  The public authorities with which Veolia Transport contracts generally own the heavy infrastructure used by Veolia Transport, and typically setservice specifications (covering schedules, routes and fare structures forstructures) set by the networks that Veolia Transport operates and manages.   competent public authorities, who generally retain ownership of the infrastructure. Contracts are awarded following public tenders.

Veolia Transport primarily conducts its business through the outsourced management of transportation activities, under conditions and structures that differ from one country to another due to varying legal and regulatory requirements. Each contractThe relationship between athe public authority and Veolia Transport governs the relationships between the two parties, including payment to Veolia Transport andtransportation company is governed by fixed-term contracts that determine the risks to be borne by each party and typically lasts for a fixed period.  Becausethe remuneration of the transportation company. Given that the fares charged by Veolia Tr ansport chargesTransport to passengers on its transportation networks are usuallygenerally insufficient to cover its costs, the public authority typically provides Veolia Transport with a payment or other compensation for services rendered. Moreover, in the case of certain contracts, Veolia Transport is paid a flat fee for its transportation services;services and consequently it does not bear the risks associated with lower receipts or decreaseddec reased passenger use (such contracts beingare referred to as “Public Market” contracts in France).  Veolia Transport’s management

Management contracts generally last from 2have a term of two to 12twelve years, except for those that takewith the formexception of “operating concessions”,concessions,” which last approximatelyhave an average term of 30 years on average.


years.

Veolia Transport’s activities can be broken downfall into four principalmain categories: (i) 

urban mass transportation (urban(suburban and urban transport, suburban and other specific transportation services), (ii) ;

intercity and regional transportation, (iii) industrial markets,transportation;

infrastructure management and (iv) airport services;

transportation management (passenger information services, clearinghousesclearing-houses, call centers).

The activities of the Transportation Division are influenced by key factors of a technical, contractual and central telephone operators).economic nature, including primarily:


managing contractual risks: we exercise our activity under long-term contracts, which may hinder our ability to react rapidly and appropriately to new, financially unfavorable situations (see Risk Factors above);

managing the various aspects of sustainable-development policy, which are increasingly included in transportation authority requirements (see Risk Factors and Environmental Regulations Policies and Compliance above);

the ability to control contractual changes (see Risk Factors above);

the ability to carry out our activities in densely-populated, vast and increasingly complex areas, which entails increasing operating complexity and a greater need for inter-modality.

Urban Mass Transportation


Veolia Transport operates a number of bus networks, suburban trains, tramways and metros, and provides customized transportation services as well.transportation-on-demand services. Veolia Transport is either partially or entirelyfully responsible for designing, planning and operating services, managing personnel, inspectingproviding drivers and ticket inspectors, marketing efforts and customer service, as well as the maintenance, cleanliness and security of vehicles and stations it uses in its networks (including obtaining various permits), marketing and managing customer service.


network stations.

In many urban areas, Veolia Transport provides interconnected bus, tramway, metro and train transportation services through a ticketing system coordinated by the principal transportation provider or transportation authority within a given region.authority. Veolia Transport also offers integrated services withinin urban areas where the networks are managed by several different operators in an urban area, including the Paris suburbs,at once, such as Stockholm, Sydney, and Düsseldorf among others.and the suburbs of Paris.


In various urban areas, Veolia Transport also operates ferry services in tandem with its bus services. This is notably the case of services in various urban areas.  It does soprovided in Toulon (France)harbor and Göteborg (Sweden), for example.services to the Morbihan islands in France, as well as services provided in the Netherlands and in Sweden.



33



Back to Contents


Urban and Suburban Transportation


In France, Veolia Transport operates the tramways,tramway, bus networks and light rail networks in Rouen, Saint-Etienne, Nancy Nice and Bordeaux.Nice. In addition, during 2009, Veolia Transport iswas awarded the contract for the operation of the existing network in Valenciennes, composed of a tramway line and the planned construction of a trolleybus public transport line. The contract for the operation of the suburban network in the Aix area was also the operator of therenewed. Veolia Transport also manages bus networks in among others, Nice, Toulon (where tramway infrastructure is currently being installed as well) and approximately 40 othersome forty French cities.

Veolia Transport has a strong presence in the Ile-de-FranceGreater Paris region, where it operates numerous bus lines in the inner and outerintermediate suburbs of Paris.Paris and the greater metropolitan area. It is the main private operator in the region, operating the bus networks of Melun, Rambouillet, Argenteuil, St. Germain-en-Laye and Seine-Saint-Denis.


Seine-Saint-Denis in addition to several highway express routes.

In Northern and Central Europe, Veolia Transport operates tramwaystramway, metro and light rail networks in Görlitz and Berlin (Germany), Dublin (Ireland), Trondheim (Norway) and Norrköping (Sweden). It also operates bus routes in Scandinavia, Switzerland, Belgium, the Czech Republic and Stockholm (Sweden).several cities in Poland. In the Netherlands, in addition to regional transport in the Hague, Veolia Transport also began operating the bus network serving this city’s suburbs in 2009. Veolia Transport also operates the Stockholm metro, as well as bus linesall integrated (inter-modal) public transport networks in Scandinavia, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Czech Republic, Estonia and numerous cities in Poland.


Limburg province (bus, transportation-on-demand, suburban rail transportation).

In southernSouthern Europe, untilvia its subsidiary FCC-Connex, a joint venture with the sale by FCC-Connex of its Spanish bus subsidiary CTSA in November 2007,group FCC, Connex Corporación SL, which is jointly owned by Veolia Transport operates the Bilbao network and FCC, combined the passenger transport activities of the two companies in Spain.  FCC-Connex managed themanages urban and suburban transporttransportation services in several other cities, including among others, the Barcelona tramwaytramway. In Morocco, a delegated bus service concession arrangement covering the towns of Rabat, Sale and the urban transport networkTemara in Morocco was signed on February 26, 2009 and came into effect in November 2009. The operation of Jérez.this fifteen-year contract was entrusted to STAREO, a subsidiary of Veolia Transport operated the urban network of the city of Pamplona.  Following the sale, Veolia Transport intends to redevelop its activities in Spain through its wholly-owned subsidiary Veolia Transport España SL.



36



Back to Contents


Transport.

In the United States, Veolia Transport provides bus transportation services principally in California, Arizona, Nevada (Las Vegas), Colorado, Texas and Maryland and Virginia. Veolia Transport and its partners in the Massachusetts Bay Commuter Railroad Company (the Bombardier groupcities of Las Vegas, New Orleans and a local partner, ACI) manage suburban trainsSeattle, as well as in the Boston area.Washington DC region. Veolia Transport also manages suburban trains in Los Angeles (Metrolink).


In Canada, Veolia Transport provides transportationtrain services in the southern suburbs of Montreal, as well as bus services in York (Ontario) since September 2005.


Boston, San Diego and Miami. In Austin, Texas, it also operates rail freight services.

In Australia, Veolia Transport operates the entire suburban rail network of Melbourne as well as theSydney monorail and light rail network of Sydney.  It also operatesand bus services in Perth, Brisbane and Sydney. In New Zealand, Veolia Transport operates trainsregional train services around Auckland. In Asia, Veolia Transport operates the bus networks of five cities in the suburbs of Auckland.


Jiangsu and Anhui Chinese provinces, as well as the Hong Kong tramway. In Korea, Veolia Transport began operating the Seoul metro line 9 in July 2009. In the rest of the world, Veolia Transport operates, through partnershippartnerships with other operators, a high-frequency right-of-way bus system (BRT: Bus Rapid Transit) in Bogotá (Colombia), and a network of bus lines in Santiago, (Chile) andChile. In Israel, in addition to the three urban bus networks and inter-urbaninter-city bus lines in Israel. In Jerusalem,already managed, Veolia Transport is also part ofwon the consortium that has been awarded the concessioncontract for the operation of a future tramway.


Lod urban network in March 2009. This contract began operations on January 1, 2010 .

Other Transport Services (transportation on demand, para-transport,(transportation-on-demand, para-transit, taxis, and more)etc.)

Veolia Transport offers innovative transportation services in certain cities that supplement traditional transportation networks. For example, Veolia Transport offers Créabus, an on-demand minibus service that is tracked by a Global Positioning System, or GPS, which operates in France in Dieppe, Montluçon, Vierzon, Bourges, Bordeaux, Ile-de-France andthe Greater Paris region, as well as in Fairfax, Viginia (United States).  Veolia Transport also manages all of the on-demand transportation

Several contract wins in 2009 further strengthened transportation-on-demand services in the United States. These include the following: all transportation-on-demand airport services in Raleigh-Durham, North Brabant regionCarolina (starting March 1, 2009), student transportation to the Stanford University campus (starting September 1, 2009) and in Limburg in the Netherlands.


transportation of Continental Airlines employees to Newark airport (starting October 1, 2009).

Veolia Transport manages taxi services in the Netherlands and the United States, in particularnotably in Baltimore Maryland, Denver Colorado, Kansas City Missouri, and Kansas City.Pittsburg Pennsylvania (USA) as well as in the Netherlands, France and Sweden. It provides transport for persons with reduced mobility in Bordeaux and other regions of France in Canada and in the United States (“paratransit”), in particular(para-transit) particularly in California, Arizona, Nevada, Texas, Maryland, South Carolina, New Orleans and South Carolina.  the Washington DC area.

In addition, in 2007,since 2009, via its specialist subsidiary, Veloway, Veolia Transport added bicycle transportationhas operated self-service bike rental systems in the city of Vannes and Greater Nice.



34



Back to its range of services.Contents


Intercity and Regional Transportation


Veolia Transport provides regional transportation services through the operation of road and rail networks. As with urban transportation services, Veolia Transport is responsible for designing, planning, operating and maintaining the network and stations. It is also charged with providing security personnel, ticketing personnel and providing security on the vehicles and stations it uses in its regional networks, as well as for ticket sales and customer service.


In France, Veolia Transport has a strong presence in the intercity and studentschool transportation markets, involving more than 60 French departments acrossmarkets. Veolia Transport is present in all regions of France and saw the country.renewal of intercity and school transportation contracts in the Gard, Moselle, Var, Sarthe, Orne and Cher regions. Veolia Transport also operates a number of regional rail networks, covering approximately 300 kilometers, through contracts with regional public authorities or(notably in the Provence-Alpes-Côte-d’Azur region) and through sub-contracts with the Société Nationale des Chemins de Fer (SNCF), the French national railroad company, particularlySNCF (notably in Brittany).

Through its subsidiary, Eurolines, Veolia Transport provides transport by motor coach on regular international routes serving over 1,500 cities throughout Europe. Since the regionsopening of Brittany, Provence, the AlpsSwedish market to competition in 2009, Veolia Transport operates a rail network between Stockholm and the French Riviera.  


In Europe,Malmö. Veolia Transport has a strong presence in Germany, with more than 3,000over 2,500 kilometers of regional railway lines, the United Kingdom, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Slovenia, Slovakia, Belgium, Spain, the Czech Republic and the Netherlands and, since late 2006, Serbia and Croatia. Through Eurolines, a company in whichlines. Veolia Transport has had a 100% interest since March 2005, Veolia Transport provides transport by motorcoach on regular international routes serving over 1,500 cities throughout Europe.


In the United States, in the regional rail network sector, Veolia Transport operates Sprinter, in South Los Angeles, and Tri-Rail, a network in the suburbs of Miami.

Veolia Transport is continuingcontinues to develop ferry transport servicetransportation services in areas such as Finnmark and Norrland (Norway) and, Zeeland province (Netherlands) and Gothenburg (Sweden), as well as through its 28%66% shareholding in theSociété Nationale Maritime Corse Méditerranée (SNCM), which manages passenger and freight maritime transportation services between Marseille, Nice, Corsica and North Africa.

In the rail transportation sector in the United States, Veolia Transport is a shareholder of SNCM alongside Butler Capital Partners (38%)operates suburban networks in Boston and Los Angeles, the Sprinter network in South Los Angeles and the French State (25%)Miami suburban network (Tri-Rail).  SNCM is fully consolidated

Hub management and airport services

Management of airport infrastructure

After entering the airport management market in our consolidated financial statements.  This consolidation method was analyzed using2007 with the IAS 27 standard and reflectsmanagement contract for the rules of governance of SNCM.  Specifically,Nimes-Garons Airport, Veolia Transport appointscurrently operates, maintains, and manages the two largest regional airports in France: Beauvais and Lille-Lesquin. These operations are carried out in partnership with the Oise Chamber of Commerce and Industry (for Nimes-Garons), and the Greater Lille Chamber of Commerce and Industry and SANEF (for Lille-Lesquin).

In December 2008, the Greater Lille Chamber of Commerce and Industry was chosen to continue managing and operating the regional airport hub with Veolia Environnement and SANEF though a company that is 34% owned by Veolia Environnement.

In both Beauvais and Lille, the competencies of all of our Divisions are brought to bear in the memberscontext of SNCM’s management board (directoire), has broad operationalambitious environmental programs: recycling, waste-to-energy conversion for non-recyclables, air-quality preservation, optimized water and financial management powersenergy consumption, planned solar-panel farms in Lille, and exercises control over SNCM withindiversified transport options (shuttle-buses, transport-on-demand, etc).

Airport Groundhandling Services

This business covers a wide range of services for airlines in the meaningairport zone, such as the transportation of IFRS.freight, baggage handling, maintenance of and fuel distribution to vehicles, assistance to aircraft on stop-over, and all “runway” and “traffic” activities relating to aircraft departures and arrivals. These services are currently primarily offered at the Roissy-Charles-de-Gaulle hub through our subsidiary, VE Airport. Veolia Transport also manages airline passenger transportation services inside airports.



3735



Back to Contents


Industrial Markets


In addition to the personnel transport services provided by its French subsidiaries, such as the Eurocopter site in Marignane, and those in the rest of Europe, Veolia Transport is present in two areas of industrial activity that represent nearly 4% of its revenues: rail transport (freight transport and management of industrial rail junctions and related logistics) and airport services.

Rail Transport

This activities in this sector are carried out in Europe through Veolia Cargo, assisted by specialized national subsidiaries in France, Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands.

In the area of freight transport, Veolia Transport operates a number of regional, national and international freight trains in France, the Netherlands and Germany.

In 2007, Veolia Cargo reinforced its position in Germany, developed its client portfolio in the French national market, and consolidated its development strategy in France and Germany.  Veolia Cargo also launched several container transport lines, thus solidifying its partnership with the ship owner CMA-CGM.  Another highlight of the year was the creation of subsidiaries in Belgium and Italy.

In addition, in the area of industrial rail junctions and related logistics, Veolia Cargo, through its subsidiaries in France and Germany, manages junctions for large industrial customers (in particular in the steel and refining industries), with factories that are linked to a national rail network.  

Airport Services

This activity covers a range of services for airline clients (freight transport at Charles de Gaulle airport, baggage handling, maintenance of vehicles, etc.). It is conducted by VE Airport, in whose capital  Veolia Transport holds a 60% interest.  Veolia Transport also manages passenger transport services inside airports.

Management of Airport Infrastructure

In the area of airport infrastructure management, Veolia Transport has been operating, maintaining and managing the public areas of the Nîmes-Garons airport (grounds, construction, building maintenance, and airline intake structures for passengers or freight), since January 1, 2007. This project represents a new air transportation infrastructure management business for the Group, which provides a total management solution for a site welcoming 250,000 travelers per year.

Transportation Management


Growth in Veolia Transport’s businessbusinesses also depends on increased use of public transportation networks, which is in turn is closely relatedlinked to the quality of servicesservice provided by these networks.  To increase passenger usage of

Veolia Transport focuses its networks, Veolia Transport’s efforts focus on adequately matching service offerings with demand, for such services, and developing localpassenger information services relating to transportation systems for travelers.  

Accordingly,services. For this purpose, Veolia Transport has developed the “Optio”, a comprehensive passenger information system a service that provides complete information to anyone who wishes to use public transport within(call center, Internet, text messages and WAP) covering all transportation networks in a region (regardless of the operator). The service involves the use of a call center, an internet site, wireless text messages, such as SMS, and wireless internet access, such as WAP.  The “Optio”This system currently operates in the French departments of Oise and Isère. In addition, Veolia Transport has developed “Connector Plus”, a real-time information system installed in the rail network of Melbourne (Australia), which notifies users of service interruptions or delays through wireless text messages on their mobile phones.  Veolia Transport has installed the “Connector Plus” system in Stockholm as well.  In addition, Veolia Transport has recently created several internet s itessites in France and Australia that allow users to prepare their itineraries using local transportation systems.

Description of Activities in 2009

In 2009, the Transportation Division reported modest revenue growth compared to 2008.

In the urban transportation sector, Veolia Transport strengthened its presence during 2009, by winning the contract for the operation of the existing Valenciennes network composed of one tramway line and the planned construction of a future second trolleybus public transport line. Veolia Transport also won contracts for the operation of the Montceau-Le-Creusot and Louviers-Val de Reuil networks. Veolia Transport was also awarded a public service delegation contract for the construction and operation of the infrastructure and shuttle service for Mont Saint Michel, as well as the Mobility Center set-up by the Alsace Regional Council. In the intercity and school transportation sector Veolia Transport renewed its contracts in the Gard, Moselle, Var, Sarthe, Orne and Cher regions. Finally, in January 2009 Veloway, a subsidiary of Veolia Transport, was awarded a contract by the City of Ni ce to set-up and manage a self-service bike rental system. This contract is composed of several firm and optional tranches and concerns the set-up of 120 bike stations and the supply of nearly 1,200 bikes.

Veolia Transport strengthened its presence in the United States by winning and renewing several contracts, including an operating contract for all urban transportation systems in FranceNew Orleans. In the Netherlands, Veolia Transport has operated the bus network for suburbs of the Hague since 2009, using environmentally-friendly vehicles (CNG buses). Veolia Transport continues its expansion in Asia including the operation of the Seoul metro line 9 in Korea begun in July 2009.

Veolia Transport renewed 74% of all major contracts, which expired during the year, representing combined estimated annual revenue of €260 million. However, Veolia Transport lost the operating contracts for the Melbourne train service, the Stockholm metro and Australia.the Bordeaux urban network. These contracts represented combined estimated annual revenue of €791 million.



3836



Back to Contents


Description of Activities in 2007


In 2007, revenues in our transportation division increased by 12.9% compared to 2006, due to an increase in revenues from urban and intercity passenger transport abroad resulting from the latest developments in Europe.

On a commercial level, despite the non-renewal of a contract for the operation of the train line between Göteborg and Stockholm and the north of Sweden (the Norrland train) and a contract relating to the operation of a portion of the Stockholm bus network (these contracts together representing less than 1.5% of Veolia Transport’s revenue), 2007 saw the renewal or the initial signing of a large number of medium-sized contracts, particularly in Europe. For instance, 17 contracts for the operation of regional bus lines in Belgium were renewed, worth a combined estimated revenue of around €33 million.  The revenue represented by non-renewed contracts in 2007 is not significant in comparison with total revenues in the transportation division.  The following were some of the highlights of 2007:

In April 2007, in the Rhône department of France, Veolia Transport won the operating contract for Leslys, the leading express railway link between the city and its airport, in a consortium that included Vinci, la Caisse des Dépôts, Vossloh and Cegelec. In maritime transportation, the operating contract for the transportation to the Morbihan Islands known as “îles du grand large” represents average annual traffic of approximately 1,600,000 passengers.

In the United States, railway activities grew significantly in 2007. In addition to the renewal of the Boston contract in December 2007, which is the contract for the operation of the largest suburban train in the American market, two new railway contracts were signed: the Tri-Rail contract in the south of Florida (a suburban train) began on July 1, 2007 for a term of 7 years and estimated total cumulative revenue of €43.2 million; in Austin (Texas), a contract for freight transport (this activity being sub-contracted to another operator) and urban and suburban passenger transport with a five-year term was concluded in August 2007 for estimated total cumulative revenue of approximately €73.5 million. The renewal of contracts with Boston and Las Vegas in January 2008 was a major success and strengthens the position of Veolia Transport in North America.

In India, a consortium in which Veolia Transport holds a 5% interest was awarded the 35-year concession contract (five years of which are dedicated to construction) for the construction, operation, and transfer of the first subway line in Mumbai (formerly known as Bombay). The operation and maintenance contract for this subway line, which is currently being negotiated between the company granting the concession and a company whose majority shareholder is Veolia Transport, should be signed during the first half of 2008.


Principal Contracts in 2009

The following table shows the principalmajor contracts signed or renewed in 20072009 with either public authorities or industrial or commercial companiesservice sector companies.1.

Public authority or company and location thereof

Month of signature of contract

New
contract or
renewal

Contract
term

Estimated cumulative revenue

(in euros)

Services provided

France

Gard Department

July

Renewal

10 years

160 million 

Management and operation of all regular lines and school routes in the Gard Department

Moselle Department

August

Renewal

10 years

177 million 

Regular coach passenger transport routes in the Moselle Department

Mont Saint Michel

October

New

13 years

91 million

Construction and operation of infrastructure and welcome facilities and passenger transport by shuttle bus between Mont Saint Michel and the bus station

Valenciennes

November

New

8 years

404.8 million

Operation of the Valenciennes urban network (tramway and construction of a future trolleybus line)

Europe (excl. France)

Landskrona / Relleborg (Sweden)

June

New

8 years

(plus 2 years at the customer’s option)

94.1 million

Operation of the City of Landskrona urban transportation network


Boräs (Sweden)

October

New

8 years

(plus 2 years at the customer’s option)

67.7 million

Operation of the Sjuhärad region urban transportation network

Troms Ferries (Norway)

March

New

10 years

115 million

Maritime transportation of passengers by ferry


Regiotaxi West-Brabant (Netherlands)

July

Renewal

4 years

(plus 2 years at the customer’s option)

72 million 

Operation of the urban transportation network of Brabant province and neighboring communes

North America

Tempe, Arizona

April

Renewal

4 years and 2 months (plus 4 years at the customer’s option)

94.7 million

Operation of regular bus passenger transportation routes and maintenance services

New Orleans, Louisiana

July

New

5 years

(plus 5 years at the customer’s option)

202.4 million

Management, operation and maintenance of all urban passenger transportation systems of the city of New Orleans (turnkey contract)

North Africa

Rabat (Morocco)

February

New

15 years

(plus 7 years at the customer’s option)

1,095.7 million

Operation of suburban bus routes around the city of Rabat


1

Revenues expected under foreignthe contracts won during 2007in 2009 have been converted into euros at the closing exchange rate as of exchange prevailing on December 31, 20072009 and represent the portion due to Veolia Transport under such contracts. Accordingly, these amounts may differ from the amounts announced in earlier Group press releases.



3937



Back to Contents





Public Authority

or

Company and Location thereof

Month of Signature of Contract or of Renewal

New Contract or Renewal

Duration of Contract

Estimated Total Cumulative Revenue

(in euros)

Services Provided

France

Public Authorities

Lyon

April

New

30 years

360 million

Operation of tramway network linking Saint-Exupéry airport to Lyon.

Morbihan Islands

November

New

7 years

154 million

Operation of service to the Morbihan Islands.

Marseille – Corsica

June

New

6.5 years

1.2 billion

Operation by SNCM of passenger and freight maritime transport between the continent and Corsica.

Europe (outside France)

Public Authorities

Norway

June

Renewal

8 years

1.3 billion

Operation of the public transport network in Finnmark.

Norway

April

Renewal

5.5 years

231 million

Operation of the public bus transport network in the Rogaland Province.

Holland

January

Renewal

7 years

371 million

Operation of the public transport network in Brabant.

North America

Public Authorities

Boston

December

Renewal

3 years

450 million

Operation of a public railway transportation network.

Rest of the World

Public Authorities

Melbourne

November

Renewal

1 year

368.5 million

Operation and maintenance of trains for Melbourne suburbs

Auckland

September

Renewal

2 years

52 million

Operation and maintenance of trains for the Auckland region.

Seoul

June

New

10 years

400 million

Operation of the 9-metro line which will open in 2009.


Acquisitions and Divestitures in 2007


2009

In 2007, Veolia Transport pursued its expansion in the Pacific zone with the February 2007 acquisition, of Transit First, which operates more than 80 buses in the Sydney region. As a result of this acquisition, Veolia Transport has more than 420 employees and a fleet of 250 buses in Sydney, transporting approximately 11 million passengers per year. Veolia Transport also acquired Brookers, thereby strengthening its development in charter buses in Brisbane. Additionally, in November 2007, Veolia Transport acquired the Australian bus operator South West Coach Lines, which is the leading bus operator in the south-west portion of the country.  As a result of these three acquisitions, Veolia Transport has approximately 4,000 employees in Australia as well as a fleet of more than 1,000 vehicles that transport more than 200 million passengers per year.



40



Back to Contents


In October 2007, Veolia Transport acquired the public transportation company People Travel Group, which operates mainly in Sweden but also in Russia, providing airport services as well as charter and tourism services. This company, which has approximately 900 employees and 165 buses, generates annual revenue of approximately €63 million. Veolia Transport also acquired Värmlandsbuss, which operates in the county of Värmland in Sweden.

On August 31, 2007,France, Veolia Transport sold all of its interestshares in its specialist freight rail-transport subsidiary, Veolia Cargo (including this company’s foreign subsidiaries), to TFH (Geodis Group) on November 30, 2009. At the same time, Veolia Cargo sold its French subsidiaries to Eurotunnel Group. Veolia Transport Danmark A/S. This company and its five subsidiaries, whose activities include public bus transport, have approximately 1,600 employees and operate more than 640 buses.

received total consideration for these transactions of €103 million. In total, over the courseaddition, SNCM, a subsidiary of 2007, Veolia Transport, formed or purchased 55 companies, merged 38 companies,sold its 45% stake in CMN on December 1, 2009 for total consideration of €45 million.

Veolia Transport strengthened its activities in Asia, primarily through its joint venture with RATP Développement, which is active in China, Korea and liquidated or sold 18 companies.  AtIndia. In April 2009, Veolia Transport acquired a 50% stake in Hong Kong Tramways and commenced operating the sole Hong Kong tramway. In the United Kingdom, Veolia Transport rationalized its structure by grouping together in two single entities all transportation activities, in England, as Veolia Transport England plc and, in Wales, as Veolia Transport Cymru plc.

Finally, Veolia Environnement entered into discussions with Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations regarding the combination of Veolia Transport and Transdev, to create a global leader in collective passenger transportation and sustainable mobility.

As of December 31, 2007,2009, Veolia Transport included 528was composed of 521 consolidated companies, compared with approximately 520to 549 as of December 31, 2006.2008. During the year, twenty-nine companies were consolidated for the first time, twenty-nine companies were merged and twenty-eight companies were liquidated or sold.

Development of Synergies: Multiservice Contracts


to Benefit Industrial and Commercial Services Clients

Outsourcing and Multiservices Market

We believe that ourOver several years we have forged a position in the industrial services market for industrial and, commercial services customers has allowedmore recently, in the public and private service sector market, which reflects the synergies between our four Divisions. These enable us to take advantageprovide management services covering a wide range of the synergies that exist among our four divisions.services. Growth in this market which is estimated to be greater than 10% per year, was initially due toprimarily driven by the expansion of outsourcing, as industrial companies soughtseek to outsourceconfer the management of certain activities ancillary activities to third-partytheir core businesses to third party service providers.

This outsourcing trend applies to allseveral of our businesses, including energy services, water services, waste management services, on-site management of rail junctionsthe water cycle, waste processing and rail freight transport.

recovery and on-site logistics management. We offer a “multiservice”“multi-service” alternative to our customers, which involves the provision of services by several of our divisionsDivisions under a single contract. This alternative improves our  abilityoption enables us to meetbetter satisfy the expectations of certain customers who wish to outsource a range of services to a single service provider.

From an operational standpoint, the customer relationship changes: the service provider becomes the customer’s sole contact and a dialogue develops to seek solutions which satisfy the interests of both parties. This relationshipapproach also allows for greater technical synergies, economies of scale and mutual commercial benefits.

Our multiservicesmulti-service contract signed in 2003 with PSA Peugeot Citroën, is a good example of the synergiesthese synergies. The subsidiary that are possible.  The subsidiarywas created to service this contract, Société d’Environnement et de Services de l’Est, manages all environmental services at Peugeot’s sites in easternEastern France, involvingwhich involves more than twenty different activities. By delegatingentrusting us with such a broad range of activities, to us, PSA Peugeot Citroën is able to ensure the regulatory compliance ofthat its sites comply with environmental regulations while realizingachieving significant cost savings. These savings largelyare mainly the result fromof an overhaul of the previous organization and work plan, the implementation of skillskills training programs, the resumption of managementtaking over of activities that were previously subcontracted, and the implementation of a new energy policy. In 2005, the economic and operational success of this partnership led the PSAP SA group to seek t hethe same scope of services from us forat its new facility in TravnaTrnava (Slovakia).

Our OrganizationOrganizational Structure for the Provision of Multiservices

In order to develop this multiservicesmulti-service activity, we have establishedset up a specific organization, Veolia Environnement Industries (“VEI”),structure to coordinate our various activities.  While VEI plays a supervisory role,these activities without replacing the Divisions, each of our divisionswhich remains responsible for the ultimate performance of services falling within its area of expertise.

VEIThe project structure Veolia Environnement Industries (“VEI”) manages our bids for multiservice contracts, and a project manager from VEI is appointed for each multiservicesmulti-service contract. Commercial projects and bids are prepared in coordination with the collaboration of our divisions,Divisions, and are then reviewed by a commitments committee before submissionbeing presented to clients.  Subsequently, thecustomers. The contract may beis then performed by a dedicated special purpose entity managed in part by the divisionsDivisions involved in the project, in particular if we decideespecially when our personnel is outsourced to work with the client’s personnel.customer.

Multiservices Business Activity

Our activities within the multiservices market are organized principally around 12 major contracts, which together generate revenues of more than €437 million annually and are expected to generate total revenue over the life of such contracts in excess of €2.5 billion. The average length of these contracts is eight years.

The multiservices market has a strong international dimension, in particular with respect to construction of new factories (known as “greenfield” projects).  This was the case for, among others, ArcelorMittal in Brazil and PSA Peugeot Citroën in Trnava (Slovakia).



4138



Back to Contents


UnderMultiservices Business Activity

Our activities in the multi-service market primarily consist of approximately fifteen major contracts, which together generate average annual revenue of more than €420 million and are estimated to generate cumulative revenue over their term of around €2.7 billion. The average contract term is ten years.

Multi-service activities have a five-year multiservicesstrong international dimension, particularly when industrial customers invest abroad involving the construction of new factories (so called “Greenfield” sites). This is notably the case for Arcelor in Brazil, PSA Peugeot Citroën in Trnava (Slovakia) and La Seda de Barcelona in Sines (Portugal).

Through our subsidiary VEI, we signed a cooperation agreement with DCNS Group in March 2009 forming a joint venture, Défense Environnement Services (DES), in which we hold a 51% stake. DES will manage outsourcing contracts for the provision of support services to Defense sites, set-up by the French State as part of the General Public Policy Review. The first project in this sector is at the Creil defense base and DES made the final three-candidate short-list for the competitive tender organized by the Defense Ministry. DES also signed a multi-service contract with RenaultDCNS in 2009 covering support services for its sites. This contract kicked-off in April of 2009 on a limited basis in Brest and then in June 2009 in Lorient and Indret. This activity has generated revenue of approximately €2 million, representing annualized revenue of approximately €3.5 million. In the lon g-run, activity at the DCNS sites is estimated to generate annual revenue of €15 million.

In 2009, PSA Peugeot Citroën entrusted the construction of a parking garage and its fitting-out with solar panels at the Sochaux site to the Eolfi Sense partnership. This contract is the first to be won following a team effort involving Veolia’s dedicated subsidiary Eolfi, and the Sense Studies and Development team.The car parking garage, containing 801 spaces, will be delivered in September 2010 for use by PSA Peugeot Citroën employees at the Sochaux site. 4,800 solar panels will be installed on the canopy roofs, providing approximately 1.2 million kilowatts per annum into the French electricity network, equivalent to the annual consumption of 377 households or 1,550 individuals. This parking garage is a major industrial project and forms part of the sustainable development strategy of the customer. It represents an integrated approach, from the design of installatio ns to their operation over the next twenty years, including construction of the infrastructure. The construction work represents a cost of €5 million and is expected to be completed in mid-2010. The installation will generate annual revenue under the established scheme of approximately €150,000.

We also kicked off a partnership with Syngenta, the world leader in agrochemicals, entrusting us with the multi-service operation of several Syngenta sites in Europe. We kicked-off this partnership in France with two product formulation and distribution sites in Saint-Pierre in Haute-Normandy (Eure) and Aigues-vives in Languedoc-Roussillon (Gard), with operations commencing in July 2008 and January 2009, respectively. Our services cover a very broad scope, including utilities supervision and maintenance (energy and water), maintenance of buildings and outside areas, storehouse logistics, comprehensive waste management, cleaning and various services for building occupants (safety, management of work uniforms, archiving, etc.). Improving the environmental performance of the sites is an integral part of the services provided. The operation of these two sites over the planned five-year period represents estimated cumulative revenue in excess of €15 million.

A multi-service contract with Novartis was renewed for seven years in December 2007. It relates to the pharmaceutical group’s site in Basel (Switzerland), where we renovated and took over in 2008 the operation of what is today the largest waste incinerator in Switzerland. In addition, a twenty-year contract was signed in December 2006, (under which operations began in January 2007), we manage general and environmental services at all of Renault’s automobile construction sites in the Paris region (Boulogne-Billancourt, Guyancourt and Rueil-Malmaison). This contract relies on the expertise of our energy, environmental services and transportation divisions in order to provide a wide range of services at the 1 million m² site at which Renault employs more than 20,000 people.  This contract was signed2008 with the objectiveindustrial departments of reducing expendituresthe City of Basle (IWB) for the recovery of “inevitable” energy produced by 20%. The range of servicesthe incinerator to be provided includes the management of electrical,feed a heating and air conditioning equipment, waste management and disposal, management of open spaces and developed sites, logistics and transportation (including management of all employee vehicles and their garages, management of inventories and mail transport) as well as commercial services (such as the visitor reception area). This is our most significantnetwork for a neighboring shopping mall.

In April 2008, we signed a contract signed to date for commercial sites. It represents consolidated revenues of €600 million.  

We manage all the energy production and services for Socata,with Artenius, a subsidiary of La Seda de Barcelona chemical group, for its new site in Sines, South of Lisbon, in Portugal. There, we will construct and operate a production plant encompassing all utilities, including steam, electricity, demineralized water, industrial gas and effluent treatment. Utilities production (including a 40 megawatt co-generation electricity plant) is scheduled to commence in the group EADS, at its Tarbes site.second quarter of 2011. The operation of this plant will involve optimization of the environmental impact, in particular through the use of an anaerobic effluent treatment process used to reduce the volume of waste and recover biogas. The biogas will be used instead of natural gas to produce steam. This contract draws onis set to last 15 years and to generate cumulative revenue estimated at €730 million.

Following the expertisesignature of several of our businesses. Work under thisa fifteen-year multi-service contract beganwith ArcelorMittal in early 2007.  The range of services to be provided includes2002 in Vega do Sul (Brazil), we were involved through Clé Brésil (our special purpose entity formed for the production of gas, electricity and water for allproject) in the expansion of the buildings on site, as well as for industrial processes, including Lipofit2, a “clean” fuel. Also included are all services relatingArcelorMittal plant. An initial construction contract representing annual revenue of US$8 million was awarded to the technical maintenance of the plant and buildings, environmental servicesus for the site,design and services for users including mail, caretaking, and reception.  This is a three-year contract that may be extended to five years and represents estimated annual revenuesconstruction of €3.4 million.

On December 21, 2007, we renewed a multi-services contract with Novartis relating to Novartis’ siteutilities production technical units. The work was accepted in Basel, Switzerland. The initial contract, which was signed in 2000 for a seven-year term was, at the time, the largest environmental services outsourcing agreement to be signed by an industrial company and allowed the integration of more than 300 Novartis employees within our company. Novartis, along with Ciba and Huntsman, which are located at the same sites, renewed their relationship with us by entering into this new seven -year contract representing combined annual revenues of  €140 million.  This contract, which represents cumulative revenue of close to €1 billion, is the largest contract we have signed with an industrial client. The services are to be provided by one of our subsidiaries, Valorec Services AG, at the sites of St Johann, Klybeck in Basel and Schweizerhall e. The scope of services, which is virtually unchanged, includes the management and maintenance of the energy production and distribution utilities, the solvent recycling plant (one of the largest sites in Europe), the incineration of hazardous materials and overall day-to-day waste management responsibilities.

We continue to perform contracts previously entered into with ArcelorMittal (in Montataire, France and in Brazil), Futuroscope (in Poitiers, France), Visteon (in Germany), Corus Packaging (in the United Kingdom), PSA Peugeot Citroën (in Mulhouse, Sochaux, Vesoul and Belfort, France and in Trnava in Slovakia), and Schenectady (in Béthune, France).November 2009.

Multiservices Contracts Signed in 2007

We entered into the following multiservices contracts in 2007 with industrial clients1:

Company

Location

Month of Signature of Contract

New Contract or Renewal

Duration of Contract

Estimated Total Cumulative Revenue

(in euros)

Services Provided

Socata (EADS)

Tarbes (France)

January

New

3 years

10 million

Provision of gas, electricity and water utilities for buildings and processes; use of the clean fuel “Lipofit2”; technical maintenance and building maintenance; user services.

Novartis (CIBA, Huntsman)

Basel (Switzerland)

December

Renewal

7 years

980 million

Management and maintenance of energy production and distribution utilities; management of solvent recycling installations; management of the incineration of hazardous waste; day-to-day waste management.

1 Revenues expected under foreign contracts won during 2007 have been converted into euros at the rate of exchange prevailing on December 31, 2007.  Accordingly, these amounts may differ from the amounts announced in earlier press releases.  



4239



Back to Contents


Multiservices Contracts Signed in 2009

We entered into the following multiservices contracts in 2009 with industrial clients.1

Company

Location

Month of signature of contract

New contract or renewal

Contract term

Estimated cumulative revenue

(in euros)

Services provided

DCNS

Lorient, Indret and Brest

April to June

New

10 years

35 million

Multi-services – military base support services

PSA

Sochaux

May

New

20 years

8 million

Construction and maintenance of roof solar panels

Syngenta

France (and then Europe)

October

New

5 years

15 million

Supply of utilities and maintenance of related equipment.

Maintenance of buildings and outside areas, storehouse logistics and waste management

Tenant services.


Competition

Most markets for environmental services are very competitive and are characterized by increasing technological challenges arising fromdue to changes in regulations,regulation, as well as the presence of experienced competitors.

Competition in each of the markets in which we serveparticipate is based primarily based on the quality of the products and services provided, and the supplier’ssuppliers’ reliability, customer service, financial strength,position, technology, price, reputation and experience in providing services. Additional considerations include the ability to adapt to changing legal and regulatory environments, as well as the ability to manage employees accustomed to working for governmentalpublic authorities or non-outsourced divisionsdepartments of industrial or commercial enterprises.service sector companies. In each of theour markets, in which we operate, our competitive strengths areadvantages include our technological and technical expertise, our financial position, our geographical reach, our experience in providing all environmental management services, managing privatized andour management of outsourced employees, and our ability to comply with regulatory requirements.

In the particular area of provision of environmental services to industrial clients,industry sector, Suez Environnement provides a range of services including in particular energy, water and waste management. TheIn the energy sector, the GDF-Suez merger and the anticipated listing of Suez Environnement dodoes not significantly change theour competitive position, despite the merger of Suez Environnement.Cofatech (GDF) and Elyo (Suez) to form Cofely. Certain actorsplayers, who originally operated in theneighboring industrial sectorsectors, are also tryingseeking to enlargeextend the scope of their business to includebusiness. This is the provision of environmental services. In particular,case for the subsidiaries of certain energy producers (such as Cofatech, a subsidiary of GDF, andproviders, notably in the heating network sector (Vattenfall, RWE) have been active in doing so.. Companies specialized in electronic installation, such as Faces (a subsidiary of Cegelec)Cegelec, have also expanded their environmental services offering. In the area of facilities management, companies such as Johnson Controls seek to provide multiservice offers to their commercial services clients.  Cleaning companies, such as ISS, are attempting to expand their offerings and to provide solutions outside of the cleaning business. Additionally,Finally, among new competitors, GE has announced its intention to developexpand its business withininto the water sector. However, the vast majority of competitors do not offer the same range of technical expertiseexpert ise in environmental services asthat we do. Therefore, in certain cases, our competitors are forcedrequired to set up ad-hoc arrangementsad hoc alliances of companies to respondcover the service scope required by customers.


1

Revenues expected under the contracts won in 2009 have been converted into euros at the closing exchange rate as of December 31, 2009 Accordingly, these amounts may differ from the amounts announced in earlier Group press releases.



40



Back to clients’ demands.Contents


We expect that our competitors in individual sectors will, in the coming years, seek to expand their activities to become integrated environmental management servicesservice providers. This change has been prompted by the desire of potential clientscustomers to outsource a larger portionportions of their business. Thus we have observed the development of companies with worldwide abilities have begun to respond tocapabilities focusing on multi-site and multi-national calls forinternational tenders, such as Johnson Controls or Jones Lang LaSalleLasalle in facilities management. Industrial servicesservice providers are also moving towards greater consolidation by creating multiservice subsidiaries, asmulti-service subsidiaries. This is the case of Voith in Germany.


A new form of competition has developed over the last few years due to the growing role of financial groups such as infrastructure funds (such as Macquarie Bank)(Macquarie Bank, etc.) or private equity funds. Although they are not global or strategic competitors, theythese players are often present in privatization tenders and asset sales and can occasionally compete with usthe Group for growth opportunities. The development of Public-Private Partnership (PPP)PPP has also resulted in the appearanceemergence of new players from the construction sector whothat are capable of managingable to manage the significantmajor construction and financing challenges imposedrequired by these operations. Service providers like us may collaboratejoin forces with these companies within the frameworkas part of groupsalliances formed to respond to calls for tender offers. TheseSuch companies mainly include mainly Bouygues, Vinci and Eiffage.


ItFinally, it is important to note that our majormain competitor is often the clientcustomer itself. ClientsCustomers systematically compare the benefits and advantages of outsourcing towith maintaining the status quo.

With respectregard to the provision of environmental services to public authorities, there has been a tendency in France over the last fewin recent years towards returninga return to local government control, which has reduced the number of delegated management contracts available inon the market. Nevertheless, this tendency has remained fairly limited. In Germany, thepublic entities (Stadtwerke) play a leading role in the environmental services market (in the areas of water, environmental serviceswaste management and energy services). In numerousa number of countries in Eastern Europe, however, markets are slowly opening to competition, albeit partially.

This trend nonetheless remains limited. Finally, new actorsplayers from the public works and building sectors may begincould look to offer services in the service market following completion of largeinvolving major and/or extensive investments,complex new investment, which in turnsubsequently require the provision of services (e.g., construction of a hospital which then requires ongoingoperation and maintenance of common and technical services). These new actorsplayers may provide services within the contextas part of a BOT or concession contractcontracts or, in France, as part of a “partnership contract”contracts” as authorized by athe new regulation dated June 17, 2004.2004 regulation. The emergence of such new actorsplayers is a natural outgrowth of the development of a global service market integrating the construction and financing of the infrastructures necessary to the performance of services, which then revert to the customer at the end of a contract.

Water Division

Veolia Eau confirmed its role as leader in the water and wastewater treatment sectors,1 where its main competitor across all markets is Suez Environnement.

In national and regional markets, Veolia Eau has a number of local competitors, including both public and mixed private-public operators.

Its main competitors in France are Lyonnaise des Eaux (Suez Environnement), Saur (Séché Environnement) and local public authorities. The year 2009 was also marked by Gelsenwasser increasing its investment in Nantaise des Eaux Services to 100% and by the arrival of new competitors from the environmental services sector (Derichebourg, Pizzorno).

In Spain, our main competitors are Suez Environnement (via Aguas de Barcelona; which Suez Environnement acquired control of in October 2009 after several years as a long-term shareholder) and construction and public works companies such as Aqualia-FCC, ACS, Sacyr and Acciona, which are also intending to grow internationally.

In the rest of Europe, aside from Suez Environnement, our main competitors include Acea in Italy, companies such as Gelsenwasser in Germany and Remondis, which broke into the market in Russia.

In the United States, American Water (which is relaunching after completing its demerger from RWE), United Water (Suez) and Aqua America are the main purely American players.

In the North African and Middle East markets, as well as Latin America, Veolia Eau is in competition with Spanish companies (Acciona, Aqualia-FCC, ACS) and is facing the increasing importance of Japanese trading companies (Mitsui, Marubeni, Mitsubishi, Sumitomo, etc.), which ownershipare seeking to establish a position in stable, long-term activities.


1

Sources: Global Water Intelligence (GWI) of infrastructure developed in order to support the provision of comprehensive environmental services often reverts back to the client at the term of a contract.  For the moment, however, these new actors have acted on a project-by-project basis,November 2009 and do not seem to have a global strategy for establishing a co mpetitive presence on the market.Pinsent Masons Water Yearbook 2009/2010.



4341



Back to Contents


Water

Through Veolia Eau, our principal international competitor in the water sector in 2007 wasChina is also a strategic development region for Suez Environnement (through its subsidiary Ondeo), which strengthened its position in Spain (by increasing its stake in Agbar and investing in the capital of Aguas de Valencia following the repurchase of the interest previously held by SAUR). RWE, which in 2006 had announced a reorganization process in order to focus on its energy businesses, sold Thames Water Holdings plc, the most significant water management company in Great Britain, to the consortium Kemble Water Limited, managed by Macquarie, in 2007. After this announcement in March 2006, the initial public offering of its American subsidiary American Water was postponed.

In the North African, Middle Eastern, Chinese and Indian markets, Veolia Eau competes with Asian companies (Singaporeancompanies. There is also increased competition from local companies, such as the new entrant Beijing Enterprises, as well as Japanese, Malaysian and the Singaporean companies, AsiaEnv and Hyflux, which are also present in the Middle East and Asia Environment, and Japanese companies,North Africa region. This market is also of interest to technology providers such as Marubeni and Mitsui) and Spanish companies from the building and public works sectors (Acciona, Aqualie-FCC, ACS), but also with conglomerates, particularly General Electric and Siemens, which have demonstrated their international ambitions in water treatment technology.

At bothare also betting on India with a specific focus on the nationaldesalination and regional level, Veolia Eau faces a number of local competitors, including public companies and local mixed public-privatewastewater recycling sectors. But other companies, such as AceaDoosan (South Korea), Keppel (Singapore), VA Tech Wabag (India) and AmgaIDE Technologies (Israel), have emphasized their ambitions for international expansion and extending their areas of expertise, in Italy, Gelsenwasser in Germany (which entered the French market through the purchase of an interest in the capital of Nantaise des Eaux), Canal Isabel II in Spain, public enterprises in Brisbane, Australia or semi public entities (régies départementales)in France.

In addition, investment fundsa manner similar to VWS&T and other pension funds seeking stable revenues (Hastings Funds Management, Macquarie, JPMorgan, Canadian Pension Fund) made significant investments in regulated water assets in Britain (South East Water, Thames Water, Southern Water) and Chile (Ontario Teacher’s Pension Plan with Essbio and Aguas Nuevo).Degrémont.

Environmental Services Division

Through Veolia Propreté, our principalOur main competitors in the environmental servicesthis sector are either solely regional players, or they cover only onecompete for part of the sector in whichservices offered by Veolia Propreté operates.

. In Europe (including Central and Eastern Europe), where Veolia Propreté conducts the majority of its waste management activities, and in the PECO zone, the principal competitor is Suez Environnement, acting through its subsidiary SITA, Remondis, FCC and Biffa.

Veolia Propreté may expand further in North America as well, wherebusiness, its principal competitor is Waste Management, along with Allied Waste and Republic Services.

In Latin America, Veolia Propreté’s operations are concentrated in Brazil and Mexico, where it competes primarily with Suez Environnement and a variety of local companies.

In the Asia/Pacific region, Veolia Propreté’s main competitors are Cleanaway and Suez Environnement (acting through its subsidiary SITA), as wellasRemondis and Biffa. North America represents a promising growth market for Veolia Propreté. The North American market is highly concentrated, with only two major competitors, Waste Management Inc. and Republic Services Inc. (the new entity formed by the merger of Allied Waste Industries and Republic Services at the end of 2008). Finally, in the Asia-Pacific region, our main competitors are Suez Environnement and various local companies.  The Australian group Brambles (operating under the Cleanaway brand) has withdrawn from the waste management business.

Energy Services Division

Combining diverseThe energy services market combines a diversified range of services and has many different types of market participants, the energy services market presents us (throughplayer. Through our energy services division, Dalkia) withEnergy Services Division, we therefore face strong competition posedcomposed of sector-specific players. Only the group formed by sector-specific companies. Only two companies, Elyo (Suez) and Cofatech (GDF) have strong international presences andthe GDF-Suez merger, primarily with Cofely, has the ability to offer a diversified and complete service offercomprehensive range of services with a strong international presence that is comparable to ours.  Dalkia’s presence and services. Cofely represents a major competitor, mastering a range of expertise similar to that of Dalkia. Competition was intense in 2009, particularly in France, with a clear policy to win market share.

Among sector-specific companies,players, Dalkia competes againstfaces the active presence of large local competitors with active presences, such as ENEL, Vattenfall, Fortum, ATEL and EON.

In the commercial servicesservice sector, competition takes many forms, and comes from specialized companies (in the areas of cleaning, and food services, for example)etc.) seeking to expand their offering to include multi-technical services, and from technical maintenance companies focusing on technical maintenance such asand electrical installation.

installations. In addition, we face historical but growing competition from municipally- or publicly-run companies, principally in Central Europe, Germany, Austria and Italy.



44



Back to Contents


Transportation Division

In the transportation sector, our principal competitors are large private operators, primarily French, American orand British but also Asian, and public companies (national or local) operating public monopolies. Our principal

The main private competitors aton the international levelglobal stage are the British groups FirstGroup,Firstgroup, Arriva, National Express and Stagecoach, Arriva and Go Ahead, andthe French groups Kéolis (which has SNCF as an industrial partner and shareholder, though 53% of its share capital is held by 3i, an investment fund)Keolis and Transdev (a subsidiary of(see Item 8 “Financial Information Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information – Significant Changes”, below) and the Hong Kong company, MTR Corporation.

With regard to French private groups, Keolis’ main industrial shareholder is SNCF. The Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations, which has an alliancethe majority shareholder in Transdev, is in negotiations with Veolia Environnement regarding the French metro operator, RATP). FirstGroupcombination of their two Transportation subsidiaries. These decisions are taken in the context of a planned stock market listing of the Group’s Transport business.

With the current trend towards consolidation in the mass transportation market, SNCF, Keolis and Effia announced a merger project and already work together in a number of areas. In addition, SNCF Proximités, a specialist in local and regional mobility, is the world’s largest group for public and private transportation. positioning itself in several business segments to export its know-how.

Among Veolia Transport’s largest public competitors are Deutsche Bahn (the national rail operator in Germany) and in France, the RATP and SNCF.  

In North America, the competitive market has evolved, particularly as a result of the purchase of Laidlaw by FirstGroup.  In the area of rail transport, Amtrak’s persistent budget difficulties have further opened the market to delegated private management.SNCF in France.

In Asia, companiestwo players with growing international objectives constituteambitions represent new competitors in the European and Asian markets. These companies include,Of particular note is the Hong Kong suburban metro and train operator, MTR Corporation. This group, which merged with Kowloon-Canton Railway in particular, ComfortDelgro,2007, has won a number of contracts including the transport network operatorconcession for the Dexing metro line in Singapore, 40%Beijing and the operation of whose revenue come from international business, especiallythe Stockholm metro and the Melbourne suburban rail network. In addition, MTR is present in numerous rail bidding processes in China and Europe. The second largest Asian competitor is ComfortDelgro, which operates the transportation network in Singapore.



42



Back to Contents


In the United Kingdom,States, Amtrak’s persistent budget difficulties have opened the rail market to delegated private management. The competitive environment in the United States has changed with the arrival of new competitors such as Keolis, RATP Développement and MTRC,Go-Ahead.

In conclusion, Veolia Transport is operating in an environment marked by two trends: increasingly intense competition between the subway operator in Hong Kong, which participated in several calls for tenders for railways in Asiamajor international groups and Europe.industry consolidation, leading to the formation of a few extremely large local passenger transportation groups.

Contracts

Our activity is focused on providingContracts with public authorities under which we provide general-interest services either to the public usually in connection with a contract with aor public entityservices, for which the local authority is responsible, for the service—for example, in connection with the delegated public service management of a drinking water production and distribution service or management of an urban heating and cooling network—or to the contractual counterparty directly, which may be a public entity or an industrial or tertiary enterprise (such as an outsourcing contract).  Increasingly, the assignments involve the development and building, as well as financing, if needed, of facilities and the work necessary for the operation. This tendency is a natural result of increasingly stringent requirements relating to environmental and economic efficiency and the significant awareness that this efficiency requires equipment and work, which from the beginningcan take operational concerns into account. Budgetary constraints placed upon public finances in a number of countries are alsoforms depending on whether the local authority decides to delegate operating activities to a factor. Allcompany which acts on its behalf but under its control or whether it decides to perform the services itself with the assistance of the contracts signed with public entities are global assignments involving conception, construction, financing and management, which are sometimes called PPP by extension. Contracts can normally be distinguished based on their legal status and according to whether the person receiving the service from the company is a public or private person seeking assistance in its activities, or whether the public is paying directly for at least part of the costs.  Thecompany.

These so-called “general economic interest” services we provide are often vast and multi-functional, requiring adequate employee infrastructure and specialized resources. They may also require management of works or infrastructure that are technically complex, such as a wastewater treatment network and purification plant or an industrial co-generation facility.  These works or infrastructure projects may either be provided by the client, or we may finance and build the infrastruct ure ourselves.

Our global management services to public entities provided on behalf of public authorities include water distribution, wastewater treatment, collection and treatment of household waste, public transport, production and distribution of heating and cooling through urban networks and energy services.  In many countries, the provision of such services, often referred to as general economic interest or public services isare considered in numerous countries to be the responsibility of the localcompetent public authority. Accordingly, the publicThis authority is chargedtherefore responsible not only withfor implementing regulations or controls overand exercising oversight, but also plays an active role in the provisionmanagement of publicthe services, but must also implicate itself more directly in their management, through one of the following means:  approaches:

the public authority can decide to directly manage and provideoperate public services on its own (“direct” or “internal” management), thereby limiting with its own resources or resources transferred to a 100% subsidiary over which it exercises control similar to that exercised over its own departments or agencies;

the number of projects grantedpublic authority can decide to provide the service itself, but use private operators like us and leading most oftenas subcontractors to shorter-term contracts,manage the service on its behalf, or to provide limited services;

the public authority may prefer to confer on a third party the entiretransfer responsibility for providing the public services into a company, to which case the latter, depending on the specifications of the contract, would be responsible for providing the human resources, materials and finances necessary.  The public authority may also request that the third party finance and build any required infrastructureit delegates or transfers, under the contract.terms of a contract comprising technical performance commitments, the right and the obligation to operate the service, providing staff, equipment and financing necessary and, where appropriate, financing and building the infrastructure. Third parties to whomselected by the public authority resorts may be either private operators, mixedmixed-ownership public-private companiesjoint ventures or other public entities.

Based on theThe different means byways in which public authorities choose to manage the provision of public services lead to different contractual mechanisms between the public authority and the Company, to which we have developed various types of contracts to respond to their specific requirements.easily adapt. The contracts we employuse generally fall into one of three categories, depending on (i) whether we are entrusted with totalfull responsibility for provision of aproviding the public service and (ii) whether we have a financial and commercial relationship with the end users:



45



Back to Contents


When the public authority chooses to manage and provide public services on its own (direct management), but has only limited means, andit may therefore callscall upon a private operator to provide certain limited services or works, to whomwork for which it pays a set price under contract.  contractually-agreed price. In such circumstances the public authority may enter into a variety of contracts for the supply of construction work and services.

Where new infrastructure is necessary for the provision of the services, the public authority may prefer a more expansivecomprehensive build/operate contract, involving construction and management of services, which may include the financing of required infrastructure. These are known as public market contracts under municipalEU law and also referred to as Build, Operate, Transfer (BOT) contracts, or since 2004 in France, asthese arrangements may fall into the category of “partnership contracts”, orsince 2004.

When the public authority entrusts a company with the responsibility for fully providing a public service, and the full provision of a service, with the latter assumingcompany assumes all or part of the operational risks. Generally, the provision ofrisks, generally, the service is then financed by the fees and charges paid by the end user of the service.user. The contractor, is thus responsiblewho has financial and operating responsibility for and free to implementproviding the means necessary to provide the service, but must do so in accordance with the terms set by the public authority based onwhich include minimum service thresholds, expected performancesperformance and prices charged to end users. This is the logic ofThese arrangements are known as “delegated management” contracts or “concession” in“concession arrangements” under EU law (a type of Public Private Partnerships – PPP). Characteristically, they entail a global sense (also known as a PPP), which meanstransfer to the entity assumesconcession holder of the “risks and perils” or “risks and advantages”benefits” of the activity, to the extent its compensation is linked to its operating results.



43



Back to Contents


In certain countries and for certain services, public authorities may also choose to be involved as little as possible in the provision of public services to inhabitants or to be satisfied with the more or less restrictive regulation of the relevant activities. ThisSuch a situation requires a company to seek out customers directly among the local population and creates opportunities for us, as well, most often through acquisition of thea private operator that is already serving a given area.

The historic traditions ofDepending on the various countriescountry in which we operateare operating, historic traditions will tend to favorlead to the predominance of one of the above-mentioned general contract types over the other.others. In France, for example, where there is a longlong-standing tradition of granting concessions, and delegated public service management contracts areis often the preferred choice.  

approach. Current practices in various countries have tended to converge,are converging, however, with public authorities resorting toadopting one or another of the otherabove-mentioned contract types depending on the situation. All suchIn most cases, all contracts have in most cases, the common feature of being long-term agreements. They increasingly include the building of infrastructure (or at least an upgrade of existing infrastructure) and its maintenance and may also incorporate the financing thereof.

We also enter into outsourcing contracts for the management of complex services with our industrial and commercial services clients,service sector customers, which are analogoussimilar to the above contracts. Such contracts entered into with public authorities above.take a variety of forms but are always tailored to customer expectations.

Despite differences relatedrelating to the nature of clients,customers, the services contracted, for and the nature of the legal systems in which we operate, the expectations of our clients have tendedcustomers tend to converge towards (i)convege on the same goals: a demand for transparency during the bid process and during contract performance, (ii) formation of a real partnership in search of ways to improve productivity and performance gains, and (iii) a desire for clearto achieve performance targets andwith variable compensation depending on achievement.

We are also very attentive to contractual provisions, in particular when we must finance the investments called forrequired under a contract. Given the complexity of management agreements and their generally longer term,long-term nature, we possess skills regardingin contract analysis and control. The legal and financial departments of our divisionsDivisions are involved in the negotiation and preparation of tender bids and then contracts, and carry out verifications are made on the implementation of our main contracts. Each year, our internal audit department includes a review of the contractual and financial stakes of our most significant contracts in its annual program.

Environmental Regulation, Policies and Compliance

Environmental Regulation

Our businesses are subject to extensive, evolving and increasingly stringent environmental regulations in developing countries as well as in the European Union and North America. On April 21, 2004, the European Union adopted a directive concerningon environmental responsibility that has been transposed,enacted, or is in the process of being transposed,enacted, by member states. This textdirective sets forthup a general a framework, across the principleEuropean Union, of operators’ civilenvironmental liability of competent public authorities for any serious environmental damage or threat of damage to water, land, protected species andor natural habitats, and any damage to the water and soil, excluding personsindividuals and property. This potential liability encourages the implementation of preventive measures. This directive, as enacted in French law, extends the scope of strict liability for certain serious damage to the environment.

In addition, the REACH regulationRegulation on chemicals,Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), which has been in force sincecame into effect on June 1, 2007, has establishedestablishes a new European methodology for the management of chemicals that is designed to enhanceaimed at enhancing the knowledge of the substances that are currently circulating within t hethe European market. This has particular implications for usthe Group as usersa user of such substances, in particularsubstances. It also targets the importancestrengthening of cooperation and exchange of information with suppliers.suppliers and customers. It involves improving risk management at all stages of the life cycle of chemical substances and strengthening the prevention of chemical risks concerning Group employees. The Classification, Labeling, Packaging (CLP) regulation has the same end purpose as the REACH regulation, and came into effect on January 20, 2009. This regulation makes certain amendments to existing provisions concerning t he classification, labeling and packaging of dangerous substances.

At the end of 2008, European MPs adopted a “climate-energy” package, in order to ensure European Union compliance with climate objectives by 2020: 20% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, 20% improvement in energy efficiency and 20% share of energy consumption in the European Union produced from renewable sources. This “climate-energy package” is composed of six new legislative initiatives: a directive on renewable energies, a directive on the emission trading scheme (ETS), an effort-sharing decision on greenhouse gas emissions, (outside ETS), a directive on the capture and storage of CO2(adopted on April 23, 2009 and currently being enacted by Member States), a directive on fuel quality, and a directive on reducing CO2 emissions by cars.



44



Back to Contents


Finally, in order to carry out decisions regarding the Convention on Biological Diversity, in May 2006 the European Commission implemented an action plan comprising objectives aimed at halting the decline in biodiversity and measures enabling the achievement of objectives by the end of 2010. This action plan is based on an evaluation of lost biodiversity in Europe and elsewhere in the world and measures already taken by the European Union to resolve this problem. In October 2009, the Conference of the Parties (COP) revised the strategic action plan of the Convention, in order to set new objectives for the period 2010-2020; its main focus was an analysis of how ecosystems contribute to human well-being.

Water

Water and wastewater servicestreatment activities are highly sensitive to governmental regulation. In Europe and North America,the United States, governments have enacted significant environmental laws at theEuropean, national and local levellevels in response to public concern over the environment. The quality of drinking water and the treatment of wastewater are increasingly subject to regulation in developing countries as well, both in urban and rural areas.



46



Back to Contents


The quality of drinking water is strictly regulated at the European Union level by Directivedirective 98/83/EC of November 3, 1998, relating toon the quality of water destinedintended for human consumption, which has been enacted by EU member states. It was transposed into EU member states and French law by a decree on December 20, 2001 (certainvarious provisions of which have also been incorporated intoin the French public health code). ThisPublic Health Code. In addition to quality control measures, this directive introduces beyond quality control, the concept of evaluating risks on an ongoing basis. The collection, treatment and discharge of urban, industrial and commercial wastewater is governed by Directivedirective 91/271271/EC of May 21, 1991, the objectives of which were further reinforcedconfirmed and expandedextended by the water Directiveframework directive 2000/60/EC of October 23, 2000. Public authorities also impose strict regulations upon industrial and commercial wastewater that enters collection systems and the wastewater and sludge from urban wastewater treatment pl ants.  Directive 2006/118/CEEC of December 12, 2006 concerningon the qualityprotection of ground watergroundwater provides for oversight of and a limit regarding the amount ofrestrictions on chemical substances in water by 2015. Directive 2008/105/EC of December 16, 2008 lay s down environmental quality standards for 43 chemical substances presenting a major risk to the environment or public health in the field of water policy. In France, regulations concerninggoverning water destinedintended for human consumption were revised in 2007, resulting in new water quality limits and references. The recovery of rainwater is also governed by a strict regulatory framework, covering, in particular, the use of rainwater in buildings and which introduces specific provisions aimed at protecting the quality of groundwater from the introduction of dangerous substances. For installations serving more than 10,000 inhabitants, the person responsible for the water distribution must prepare a study concerningof the vulnerability of water fixturesfacilities to malicious acts. In establishments where water is provided to the public, it is the responsibility of the person in charge of the establishment (and no longer that ofnot the public service provider) to ensure that the water is fit for consumption.

The treatment of wastewater is also directly impacted by directive 2008/56/EC of June 17, 2008, known as the “Marine Strategy Framework Directive”, which seeks to protect and conserve the marine environment and thereby conserve the ecosystem and to establish protected marine areas in order to contribute to achieving healthy ecological conditions in the European Union marine environment by 2020 and by European directive 2006/7/EC of February 15, 2006 concerning “bathing water”, which imposes new restrictions on the oversight and management of bathing water and information provided to the general public.

Public authorities also impose strict regulations concerning industrial wastewater likely to penetrate collection systems, as well as wastewater and mudsludge originating in urban used water treatment installations. In this respect, the waste framework directive of November 19, 2008 classifies land treatment using sludge produced by wastewater treatment plants as a recovery operation.



45



Back to Contents


France has numerous laws and regulations concerning water pollution, as well as numerous administrative agencies involved in the enforcement of those laws and regulations. Certain discharges, disposals, and other actions with a potentially negative impact on the quality of surface or undergroundground water sources require authorization or notification. For instance, public authorities must be notified of any facility that pumps groundwater in amounts that exceed specified volumes and French law prohibits or restricts release of certain substances in water. Individuals and companies are subject to civil and criminal penalties under these laws and regulations.  The law relating toof December 30, 2006 on water and aquatic environments of December 30, 2006 addresses community demandsEU requirements for high quality water and significantly modifies the French legislation on water, also addressing community objectives concerningEU water quality unti lobjectives for 2015. In addition to measures to preserve the quality and quantity of resources, the Planning Law no. 2009-967 of August 3, 20 09 to implement theGrenelle de l’environnement1 decisions (known as the “Grenelle 1 Law”) provides for the implementation of a blueprint to preserve the ecological continuity of surface water masses. This blueprint must be taken into account in the territorial planning process, via urban-planning and water-planning documents. With regard to public health, measures must be taken to protect drinking water catchment areas of strategic supply importance and certain toxic emissions into water sources must be reduced by 2013. In the wastewater treatment sector, treatment plants must be brought up to standard by 2012 at the latest. Autonomous wastewater treatment is subject to strict regulation to protect the quality of the receiving environment, sanitary conditions and public health. The violation of these texts is punishable by both civil and criminal penalties and the corporation responsible may itself also be found criminally liable.

In the United States, the primarymain federal laws affectingconcerning the provision of water and wastewater treatment services are the Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 and related regulations promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). These laws and regulations establish standards for drinking water and liquid discharges. Each U.S. state has the right to establish criteria and standards stricter than those establishedset up by the EPA and a number of states have done so.

Environmental Services

In numerous countries, waste treatmentprocessing facilities are subject to laws and regulations that require usservice providers to obtain permits from public authorities to operate most of our facilities from governmental authorities.their facilities. The permittingpermit process requires us to complete environmental and health impact studies and risk assessments with respect to the relevant facility. Operators of landfillslandfill sites must provide specific financial guarantees (which typically take the form of bank guarantees) that cover in particular the monitoring and recoveryrehabilitation of the sitesites during, and up to 30 years after, itstheir operation. In addition, landfillslandfill sites must comply with a number of specific standards and incineration plants are usually subject to rules that limit the emission of pollutants. Waste may also be subject to various regulations depending uponon the type of waste. For example, sludge produced at wastewater treatment stations that willto be compostedused in agriculture must comply with strict r egulationsregulations relating to its content of organic materials and trace metals (heavy metals likesuch as cadmium, mercury or led)lead). Further,Moreover, the NFU 44-095 standard, establishedimplemented in 2002 and henceforth applicable in France since March 18, 2004, strictly regulates the composting of material that results fromproduced by the treatment of wastewater.

In France, pursuant to the provisions of Articles L. 511-1 et seq. of the EnvironmentEnvironmental Code (Code de l’environnement) (articles L. 511-1etseq.) relating to registered installationsclassified facilities for the protection of the environment, several decrees and ministerial and administrative orders establish rules applicable to landfillslandfill sites for household, industrial, commercialhazardous and hazardousnon-hazardous waste. These orders govern, among other things, the design and the construction of waste treatmentprocessing centers. Hazardous waste is subject to strict monitoring at all stages of the treatment process.processing cycle. Hazardous waste is tracked using a waste monitoring slip (bordereau de suivi des déchets - BSD). Waste-to-energy centers are subject to numerous restrictions, including in particular limitations on the amount of pollutant emissions: for example, directive 2000/76/EC of December 4, 2000 on the incineration of waste fixessets emission thresholds for dioxins and NOXNOx in particular. In connection with

At European Union level, a new Waste directive was adopted on November 19, 2008, setting up a hierarchy of different waste management measures and favoring (i) the applicationprevention of production, notably by requiring Member States to draft national programs, (ii) re-use, (iii) recycling, by defining new objectives to be attained by Member States by 2020, (iv) other forms of recovery and (v) safe disposal. It clarifies the concepts of recovery, elimination, end-of-waste status and by-products. The aim of this directive is to promote recycling, composting and waste-to-energy recovery of household waste.


1

Grenelle de l’Environnement(France): talks between the French government and a wide variety of organizations in France, co mpliance studies were submittedOctober 2007 to local French authorities in charge of the supervision of each relevant installation in June 2003, in order to determine the necessary corrective measures to be implemented by the end of 2005.establish a roadmap for sustainable ecology, development and construction.



4746



Back to Contents


At the European Union level, the framework for waste management regulation is provided by directives that set overall regulatory goals of waste prevention, collection, recycling and reuse. European Union member states are required to prohibit the uncontrolled discarding, discharge and treatment of waste pursuant to these directives. Several existing European regulations seek to have member states define a national strategy that allows for the progressive reduction of dumping of biodegradable waste. The regulations are intended to promote recycling, composting and energy recovery of household waste.

With respect to the cross-border transportation of waste, across national borders, the regulation of June 14, 2006 concerning the transfertransportation of waste entered into force in July 2007. This text sets forthdefines the termsconditions of the supervision and monitoringaudit of waste transfers and simplifies and defines the current procedures for the supervision of waste transfers for non-hazardous, recyclable waste.

In addition, the European Union has,Furthermore, through directive 2003/87/EC of October 13, 2003, the European Union implemented a quotaan allowance system for the emission of greenhouse gasesgas emissions, targeting carbon dioxide in particular. Our waste managementonly. Veolia Environnement’s environmental services business is excluded fromfalls outside the scope of the first phase (2005-2007) of this directive, but may be targeted subsequently, and may as a result establish procedures to reduce methanesecond phases (2005-2007 and carbon dioxide emissions.2008-2012).

The major statutes governing our waste management activities in the United States include the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, the Clean Water Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (also known as “CERCLA” or “Superfund”), and the Clean Air Act, all of which are administered either by the EPA or state agencies to which the EPA delegates enforcement powers. Each state in which we operate also has its own laws and regulations governing the generation,production, collection and treatmentprocessing of waste, including, in most cases, the design, operation, maintenance, closure and post-closure maintenance of landfillslandfill sites and other hazardous and non-hazardous waste management facilities.

Energy Services

Our energy-related activities in Europe (primarily the supply of energy services involving thermal and independent energy) are subject to directives and regulations that seek to control environmental impact and risks.

One such directive, ofdated October 23, 2001, establishes emission limits for sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and dust and regulates the construction of large combustion plants. It requires the implementation of national emission ceilings for certain atmospheric pollutants such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and volatile organic compounds.

Since the end of 2007, the IPPC directive of September 24, 1996 regarding the “integrated prevention of pollution” is fully applicable. TheThis directive requires a number of European industrial facilities, including large combustion facilities,plants, to obtain licenses authorizing their operations, towhich must be renewed periodically, and which are based, as much asto the extent possible, upon theon techniques having the least amount of environmental impact, that is, “the best techniques available”referred to as “best available techniques”.

Following the repeal of European regulation 2037/2000/EC, of June 29, 2000a new European regulation 1005/2009/EC, dated September 16, 2009, sets a timetable for the elimination of substances that destroy the ozone layer, in particular refrigerating fluids such as chlorofluorocarbon and hydro chlorofluorocarbonhydro-chlorofluorocarbon that are used in cooling plants.

As a result of the Kyoto Protocol, European regulation 842/2006/CEEC of May 17, 2006 imposes rigorousrequires stringent confinement and traceability measures for greenhouse gases, both forwhether HFC refrigerating liquids or SF6 electrical insulators. Two European regulations clarify leakage control measures for refrigeration equipment containing hydro-fluorocarbons (European regulation 1516/2007/EC of December 19, 2007) and fire protection systems (European regulation 1497/2007/EC of December 18, 2007).

With respect toOur Energy Services business is affected by European directive 2003/87/EC of October 13, 2003 on greenhouse gases and carbon dioxide quotas, the energy services’emission allowances, as amended by European directive 2009/29/EC of April 26, 2009. Given that we have combustion installations of morewith thermal output greater than 20 MW, have been part of thethese are also affected by EU member state national plans of EU member states for the allocation of quotasgreenhouse gas emission allowances, which have been in effect since February 2005.

European directive 97/23/EC of May 29, 1997, aimed at harmonizing member stateMember State legislation in the area of pressure equipment, imposes various security requirements for the design and manufacturing of such equipment, and requires that it be inspected for proper use.

With respect to European directive 2003/87/EC of October 13, 2003 on greenhouse gases and carbon dioxide quotas, Dalkia’s combustion installations of more than 20 MW have been partan inspection of the national planscompliance of EU member states for the allocation of quotas since February 2005.



48



Back to Contents


Finally, with respect to its production of sanitary hot water, Dalkia is directly affected by European directive 98/83/EC of November 3, 1998, which addresses the quality of water destined for human consumption. Eighteen states, including France, have taken the position that this directive applies to cold and to hot water and to all types of management systems for production and distribution.units housing such equipment.

All of the directives and regulations mentioned above have been subsequently implemented inmust be transposed into local law by each member stateMember State of the European Union. In France, this primarily means compliance with athe law of July 19, 1976 law and its implementing decrees relating toon the environmental protection of designated installations. installations, now integrated into the French Environmental Code.

Under this law, Dalkia must obtain various permits and authorizations from regulatory authorities in order to operate its facilities, and ensure that its operations strictly comply strictly with the terms of such permits. For large combustion installations (output(thermal output greater than 20 MW), new regulations were imposed in 2002 (for new installations) and in 2003 (for existing installations) with respect to emission limits, in application of European Union directive 2001/80/EC of October 23, 2001.2001 and by the increasingly systematic application of “best available techniques”.



47



Back to Contents


Finally, with respect to the production of sanitary hot water, Dalkia is directly affected by European directive 98/83/EC of November 3, 1998 (as transposed in numerous national texts) which addresses the quality of water intended for human consumption. Eighteen Member States, including France, have taken the position that this directive applies to cold and hot water and to all types of management systems for the production and distribution of hot and cold water.

Articles R.512-55 to R.512-66 of the Environmental Code also require periodic inspection of certain installations classified as subject to reporting requirements. All orders governing the performance of such periodic inspections were published in 2008.

Decree no. 2007/737 of May 7, 2007, also integrated in the Environmental Code, completes Regulation 842/2006/EC and regulates the conditions of market release, use, recovery and destruction of substances used or intended for use as refrigerating fluid in refrigeration or air-conditioning equipment.

With regard to pressure equipment, directive 97/23/EC of May 29, 1997 (which applies(applicable to material constructedequipment manufactured since 2002) has modifiedalso modifies the procedure and inspection regulatory regimesframeworks of member states in relation to procedure and inspection, and has helped to harmonize the operation of all installations that use such equipment. In France, athe decree of March 15, 2000, as modifiedamended by athe more recent decree of March 30, 2005, has transposedenacts this directive into national law.

In relation to managing the risk of legionnaire’slegionnaires’ disease, the European Working Group for Legionella Infections (EWGLI) has,, with the support and approval of the European Commission and based on the European Surveillance Scheme for Travel Associated Legionnaires’ Disease (EWGLINET), has published new European guidelines for the control and prevention of travel associatedtravel-associated legionnaires’ disease.disease (EWGLI 2005). In general, texts on the issueof varying reach are issued in Europe and around the world by public health authorities and associations for the protection of travelers.workers. Very often, these texts are presented in the form of preventive recommendations, for prevention, which take into account the physico-chemical and biological nature of water and prescribe corrective actions when certain indicators are present. Various professional associations have also issued their own guidelines for prevention.

In France, the health ministry has recommended, since 1997, that health professionals and managers of establishments implement best practices for the design and maintenance of sanitary hot water production installations and networks, air climateair-conditioning systems and other installations at risk.high-risk installations. In December 2004, there were also newly issueda new French ICPE classification was created to define guidelines for the design and operation of cooling facilities using vapor processes (cooling towers).

In Spain, the royal decree (real decreto) 865/2003 of July 4, 2003 establishes criteria for the quality of water and the frequency of inspection procedures, as well as for when action must be taken once certain limits are exceeded. A collection of descriptive procedures set out the actions to be taken and the situations where liability attches. A Spanish standard-setting association has issued a guideguidelines on the subject (100030IN).

In the United Kingdom, an approved codeApproved Code of practicePractice (ACOP L8) issued by the Health and Safety Executive is the authoritative text, whichfully applicable and has also inspiredhad a great influence on similar procedures applicable in Belgium, the Netherlands, Ireland and at EWGLI. Similarly, regulations exist in the Asia-Pacific region, which have been largely inspired by laws and regulations in effect in New Zealand and Australia.

In the United States, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) issues its own guidelines and action plans. The American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) and the Cooling Technology Institute (CTI) have also issued guidelines as well. recommendations.

Italy and Portugal have partially adopted the ASHRAE guidelines, relating tofocusing preventive measures on the protection of tourists .tourists.

Transportation

Our transportation service activities are subject to a number of national and European regulations and particularly European Union directives that limit emissions from petrol and diesel engines and require us to obtain certain permits.

In the European Union, standards called “EURO” have been established for polluting emissions from thermal engines. All new vehicles currently constructed in the European Union are in compliance with “EURO 4” standards and Veolia Transport’s networks are renewing their fleets with “EURO 4” or “EURO 5” vehicles. In 2006, the “EURO 4” standard took effect with strict requirements for the reduction of polluting emissions.

Further, Veolia Transport has made a commitment, in connection with its environmental management system, to lower its total emissions globally and to prepare for the new standards by testing and experimenting with emission reduction systems which will eventually be sold, thereby reaffirming its role as expert and consultant to client collectivities.

Veolia Transport is subject to the environmental standards applicable to depots, garages and underground cisterns whose activities may present a danger or inconvenience to the environment.  For this reason, the majority of sites in France are subject to the regulations governing classified facilities for the protection of the environment, more generally in the form of a simple notification regime.

Finally, in France, the law of February 11, 2005 relating to equal treatment and opportunities for the disabled provides that all public transport must be accessible to handicapped persons within 10 years.



4948



Back to Contents


Transportation

Our Transportation business is subject to a number of national and European regulations that limit, amongst other things, emission levels from heat engines. A series of European regulations have also been drafted setting EURO standards. These impose maximum polluting emission levels for thermal engines. All new vehicles manufactured in the European Union have complied with “EURO 5” standards since September 1, 2009. Since this date, Veolia Transport’s vehicle pool has been gradually being brought into compliance with the “EURO 5” standard as vehicles are replaced. This standard imposes stricter requirements with respect to reducing polluting emissions than the “EURO 4” standard, which was applicable since 2006. Furthermore, as part of its environmental management system, Veolia Transport is committed to lowering its polluting emissions on a like-fo r-like basis. To this end, we are preparing for new standards by experimenting with and testing emission reduction systems for polluting emissions and greenhouse gases, which will subsequently be marketed, thereby reaffirming our role as expert and advisor to customer public authorities.

Veolia Transport signed a Sustainable Development Charter composed of eight commitments. This Charter has been distributed in eighteen languages to all Veolia Transport operations. Three articles concern resource management and the management of environmental risks and comprise objectives to be attained by 2011. The “Eco-Efficient Travel”TM indicator implemented across a group of benchmark sites, entails a commitment to achieving a given percentage of green vehicles and vehicles washed with recycled water. The third commitment involves encouraging the preservation of resources and “eco-friendly actions”, by our employees and passenger customers, primarily by training drivers how to drive in a smooth and fuel-efficient manner.

Veolia Transport is also subject to environmental standards applicable to depots, garages and underground tanks, which may present environmental risks or problems. For this reason, a majority of sites in France are subject to regulations governing facilities classified for environmental protection, although generally only simplified reporting requirements apply.

Finally, all Veolia Transport priority sites are subject to environmental regulation audits every five years, as well as interim follow-up audits.

Environmental Policies

We strive to contribute tohelp enhance the enhancement of quality of life in places wherewherever we operate, and have placed the challenges of sustainable development at the heart of our strategy. ToFor this end,purpose, we focus not only on the preservation of the environment and the protection of natural resources and biodiversity, but also assume ourits economic and social responsibilities, particularly at a local level where we are committed to stimulating progress. Further information concerning our commitment to sustainable development may be found in our Sustainable Development Report.

Our action regarding greenhouse gases

An increase in greenhouse gases in the atmosphere has led certain countries, as well as the international community, to implement regulatory measures in order to limit this trend. At the international level, the Kyoto Protocol finalized in 1997, came into force in February 2005. At the European level,2005 and gave the European Union has decided to implement a quota exchange system for carbonthe objective of reducing greenhouse gas emissions throughin the European Union by 8% over the period 2008-2012, compared with 1990 emission levels. Directive 2003/87/EC of October 13, 2003.  This2003 created an emission allowance trading system has beenwithin the European Union, known as Emission Trading Scheme (ETS). The resulting system operates in place sinceparallel with the beginningKyoto Protocol system, which came into operation in 2005 and led to the creation of 2005.National Allowance Allocation Plans (NAAP) for an initial period (2005-2007) followed by a second period (2008-2012), corresponding to the Kyoto Protocol commitment period. Euro pean directive 2009/29/EC of April 26, 2009 amended the ETS directive and extended the allowance trading system to cover a third period (2013-2020), which provides for a progressive reduction in allowances granted and new grant procedures.

We are already

49



Back to Contents


The Group is active in this field at the European Union level and internationally, as well as at thea national level.level (see Note 42 to our Consolidated Financial Statements).

At

In the European Union, level, all large combustion installations with thermal output greater than 20 MW fall underare subject to the new quota exchange system.allowance trading scheme. For us,the Group, this primarily affects our energy services division,the Energy Services Division, which manages almost 73,000 suchover 80,000 combustion installations in Europe, (i.e., more than 2% of total installations). Quotasincluding nearly 250 installations concerned by emission allowances. Allowances awarded to Dalkia represent approximately 1% of alltotal European quotas awarded.allowances. Dalkia has workedadopted an active approach to help keepmanaging carbon dioxide emissions within quota limits, and has establishedallowances, by implementing an adapted organizationappropriate structure and createdcreating a dedicated legal structure,special-purpose entity, VEETRA, whose purpose it is to purchase, sell and recycleprice different kindstypes of greenhouse gas quotas.credits. These initiatives have allowed usenabled it to be an early participant in the quota exchangeallowance trading market, and through our participation we have optimizedin order to minimize the profitabilitycost of our contractscarbon restrictions and in some cases assisted clients in financingfinance new investments that help to reduce greenhou segreenhouse gas emissions.

Some of Veolia Eau’s sites in Germany have also been affected, following its securingtakeover of certain municipalpublic authority contracts ((known asStadtwerke).

At the international level (Kyoto Protocol), we have begun tryingthe Group seeks to generate emission credits that wouldcan be tradabletraded on the market, by participating in projects in partnership with other European or developing countries that help to reduce greenhouse gases.gas emissions. Veolia Propreté and Veolia Énergie (Dalkia) have already tested this in practice, throughhas completed six projects classified as Clean Development Mechanisms (CDM) by the CDM Executive Council: two in Brazil and one each in Egypt, along with six otherMexico, Argentina and Colombia. The experience gathered during these projects is now used for new projects under development. Approximately ten projects are expected to be carried out in South American projects.  DalkiaAmerica, most of which relate to sites operated by Proactiva, and others are under consideration or currently ongoing in Asia and Africa. Veolia Energie-Dalkia has also enacteddeveloped a joint project currently in Lithuania. By using dedicated teams, Dalkia andprogress in Hungary. Veolia Propreté intend to pursue this activityis assessing CDM project opportunities, p rimarily in Asia, while Dalkia assesses opportunities in China, South America, the Middle East, Israel and North Africa concerning heating networks, renewable energies and energy efficiency.

Application in the future.  Regarding transportation services,sector is subject to the first challenge in reducing greenhouse gas emissions is to establishexistence of reliable measurement tools. Veolia Transport is actively involvedparticipated in developing an initial tool that would apply to business transportation, in collaboration with EpE (Entreprise pour l’Environnement) and ADEME.ADEME (Agence de Protection de L’environnement et de la Maîtrise de L’energie). Veolia Transport is also involved in international climate negotiations. At the time of the United Nations Climate Change Conference (UNCCC) in Copenhagen in December 2009, Veolia Transport launched the “Bridging the gap: pathways for transport in the post-Kyoto process” initiative with GTZ (an international cooperation enterprise for sustainable development), the German Technical Cooperation Agency, Transport Research Laboratory (TRL) and International Association of Public Transport (UITP ). This initiative is intended to find ways for carbon finance trading to fund sustainable urban transportation projects. A series of three seminars was organized in 2009 to place transportation on the agenda of international climate negotiations.

At the national level, a number of countries have designed mechanisms to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, either in the form of a set of targeted incentives (as France has done under itsPlan Climat)(such as the “Climate Plan” and “Domestic Projects” in France) or in the form of “domestic projects” that allow selected projects to benefit from emission credits (as Newdomestic markets already set-up or under study (New Zealand, Canada, Australia, and some U.S. states have done). The latter is currently being studied by France as well.states), that allow certain domestic projects to benefit from emission credits. Our teams are followingmonitoring all of these developments and attempting to integrateworking on integrating them into their planning.projects.

In 2008, we began the operational phase of our research program on the capture, transportation, use and storage of CO2 and launched preliminary geological studies at industrial sites in the Paris region at which Veolia Propreté operates non-hazardous waste recovery installations and landfill sites. The study phase of this project was launched in 2005. This solution should contribute in 2050, to a 20 to 30% reduction in greenhouse gases worldwide. In this area, we pay particularly close attention to regulations governing the capture and sequestration of CO2, the legal framework for which is set at European level by the directive of April 23, 2009.

Direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions on(electricity and heat) at sites that wethe Group managed in 2007 reached 42.82009 totaled 49.4 million tons of CO2 (carbon dioxide) equivalents (compared to 36.547.2 million tons in 2006)2008).

We are generally contributingOverall, we contributed to a reduction inreducing greenhouse gas emissions by 23.4 million CO2equivalent tons in 2009, compared to 26.9 million CO2equivalent tons in 2008. We accomplished this through both through the daily management of sites that it operateswe operate and through the use of renewable and alternative energies (in particular biomass, landfill gas and geothermal energy).

We are actively followingfollow regulatory developments, thatwhich will undoubtedly become more restrictive in the future, viewing themfuture. We view these as new opportunities to develop and market our environmental management skills.



50



Back to Contents


Preserving ecological balances

Whether through the limitation oflimiting water evaporation, the enhancement ofwastage, enhancing the quality of our waste, the effort to optimizedischarges or optimizing energy consumption in connection with our water distribution and treatment activities, the use ofusing alternative energies in our heating operations, the recoveryacross all businesses, recovering and treatment ofprocessing biogas emissions at our landfillslandfill sites or the use ofusing low-emission fuels in our fleet of public or private transport vehicles, we getare actively involved in the main environmental problemschallenges currently affectingfacing our planet byplanet. We are applying our know-how, technological capabilities and research potential to these problems. We contribute to the enhancement ofenhancing quality of life and sanitary conditions of local populations in our day-to-day operations. For example, by supplying drinking water to impoverished areas we help to reduce infant mortality. In developed countries we have implemented plans to protect against the risk of the presence o f legionellalegionnaire s’ disease in public or industrial facilities, thereby improving public environmental sanitation.



50



Back to Contents


Similarly, improved waste management has a positive impact on quality of life, the environment and public health. The environmental service businesses offer a true means of accelerating sociological revolution.

Preserving economic and social balances

We also consider the economic and social factors that underlie the course of development in the countries in whichwhere we operate, and we work to develop solutions that are adapted to local constraintsrestrictions and know-how transfers. For example, we have instituted a program in Shanghai to educate employees about safety at work. In Romania, Alexandria and Gabon, we have developed programs that have allowed local employees and consumers to better understand the challengestransfer know-how in the provision of water and waste management services.geographical areas where our Divisions have operational responsibilities. We give preference tofavor a partnership approach with non-governmental organizations (NGOs), local authorities and associations in the implementation of action plans for the populationpopulations of emerging countries, which permitsenables the development of model plans that can be reproduced. In each of our projects, we seek to create a beneficial and educational dimension for the improvement of public hea lthhealth and the protection of the environment. We also try to assist in the development of areas where we provide services.

In 2009, we continued our strategy of forming partnerships with international institutions, reflecting our active participation in the United Nations Global Compact. Projects are focused on themed actions which involve us working alongside UN agencies, local authorities and civil society. For example, for a number of years we have contributed our expertise to drafting public/private partnership guidelines covering “access to essential services” and this regard,work reached a new partnership agreementdecisive milestone in July 2009 when it was presented at the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) meeting held in Geneva. We remain a member of the group of experts responsible for “operational aspects” and one of our contracts will be used as a “test” area. This approach is particularly important to the definition of principles of non-discrimination and will provide the poo rest in society with access to basic services (water, wastewater treatment, environmental services, energy services and transportation).

As part of the International Water Forum held in Istanbul (Turkey), we took part in the launch of a multi-partner initiative including the Prince Albert II of Monaco Foundation and the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Blue Plan, seeking to set-up a Water Think Tank to consider water management in the Mediterranean and focusing on the regulation of disputes over use. The principle of sharing best practice was continued, thanks to the participation of the Mayor of Guayaquil (Ecuador), who presented his approach to the integrated management of urban and port water. In Asia, a joint project with the Asian Development Bank enabled the distribution of a guide comprising considerable wastewater treatment data, for use by towns in the region, at the time of the Annual Congress of Citynet, an association of Asian regional authorities, of which Veolia is a partner member (Yokohama- Japan-September 2009). In addition, we continued to participate in the UNITAR program for strengthening local governance, which brought together over 500 public authority managers in 2009 from Asia, Africa, South America and Central Europe.

In preparation of the Copenhagen Conference (December 2009), we entered into in 2005 relating toa partnership with the World Hunger Program. Under this partnership, our teams present in Nigeria will work to improve the access of elementary schools to water and wastewater treatment services.

Moreover, we continueUnited Nations Development Programme (UNDP) to participate in an initiative for developing a charter on public-private partnerships (PPP) in order to improve public access to essential services, which is being supportedoriginal “Territorial Climate Plan” approach undertaken by the twenty largest territories worldwide (federal states such as California, Spanish and Italian provinces, French Ministryregions). Our expertise in clean development mechanisms will form a cornerstone of Foreign Affairs and pursued by several agencies of the United Nations. We testified asthis new partnership.



51



Back to best practices in this area during a meeting of the U.N. Sustainable Development Commission. This initiative forms part of the United Nations’ Millennium Development Goals, which were announced in 2000 by the U.N. Secretary General.  The initiative aims at defining the role of private operators with respect to local public service management, while emphasizing the principles of transparency and the sharing of technology and know-how, principles to which we already adhere in connection with our adherence to the U.N. Global Compact. This sharing of know-how occurs in particular through our participation in the cooperation program for sustainable urbanization implemented by the United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR) and the World Bank (using research centers based in Poland, Malaysia, Brazil and Africa).Contents

Our cooperation with UN agencies on multi-year programs as well as our sharing of know-how have led to our nomination as an associate member of the congress of Asian cities (Citynet).

Since May 2004, we have pursued a charity program through a corporate foundation calledFondation d’Entreprise Veolia Environnement (the Veolia Environnement Foundation). .Environnement. This initiative is part of a long-standing tradition of corporate charity work, and was designed to improvewhile enabling improved coordination of actions and employeea greater involvement of employees in the areas of social solidarity, reintroduction of disadvantaged or handicapped people into the workforce,professional reinsertion, and environmental protection. The Foundation was initially created for a period of five years and was extended in 2009 for a further five years. Since its creation, the Veolia Environnement Foundation has supported over 600800 projects, each sponsored by one of our employees.

Certaina Group employee. The Foundation calls on the expertise of the 183four Group Divisions for the purpose of its charity work and benefits from the support of all Group employees. Among the projects selected in 2007 (76 dedicated to sustainable development2009, the Foundation launched 145 new projects while continuing those initiated in communities, 67 to workforce reintroduction and 40 to environmental protection) demonstrate the international growth of the Veolia Environnement Foundation.  We have had the cooperation of the governments of several countries, including Slovakia, where the Veolia Environnement Foundation supports a center for information, health, education and professional-related services in Lomnicka, to assist the Roma community.previous years. The Veolia Environnement Foundation subsidized the purchase of a refrigerated truck to distribute food to the homeless in suburban Chicago, and has also supported a food bank in Montreal, Canada. In Chile, it helped build and equip a general sports field for young people living in disadvantaged neighborhoods in Santiago.  In India, the first Indian sponsor collaborated withlarger projects include a number of N GOsmajor importance. In Moldavia, for example, at the request of UNICEF, the Foundation provides financial support and expertise in Indiathe water and energy sectors to supportthe Child-Friendly Schools project, which seeks to improve the educational system and renovate basic school infrastructures (water, wastewater treatment, heating and thermal insulation). Another major project in the United States, sponsored by the Sky Island Alliance association, seeks to protect and rehabilitate the Madrean archipelago in Arizona, an exceptional ecosystem which is under threat. The Foundation is acting in partnership with American and Mexican NGOs, the University of Arizona, the US Environmental Protection Agency and volunteer American employees of the Group. Finally, in the Democratic Republic of Congo, the Foundation participates, alongside the Congolese Health Ministry, the French ambassador, AFD, UNICEF, various NGOs and a network of scientific institutions, in a progra m to eliminate cholera. This program is active in seven towns in the Eastern region of the country, located in lacustrine areas identified as the source of epidemics and their spread, in order to combatimprove drinking water production and distribution capacity, strengthen treatment of the sexual exploitationillness and promote hygiene and health education.

In Romania, the Foundation is assisting the associationAtelier sans frontières (Workshops Without Borders) create a computer hardware maintenance, repackaging and recycling workshop in Bucharest, offering job training to individuals facing extreme hardship and a way back to work. In Senegal, the Foundation supports theSamu Social International(an NGO) which is building a home-centre for street children in Dakar. In France, the Foundation will assist the development of young girls.  In Afghanistan, Stérience,Petite Reine, a subsidiary of Dalkiaback-to-work company specializing in the sterilization“cargocycle” transportation of hospital materials, has made its expertise available togoods in urban areas (using electrically-powered three-wheelers). The Foundation also created the Veolia Environnement Foundation in order to assist in creating a care center for serious burn victims.

In 2007, theEnvironmental Book Prize (Prix du Livre sur l’Environnement,) in 2006. Now in its fourth year, this prize this year was awarded to the “The Green Economy – How to save our plan et” by Philippe Jurgensen. In addition the Foundation created a student solidarity prize open to school and university associations. In the biodiversity sector the Foundation will support Tara Océan, a three-year oceanographic expedition organized by the Veolia EnvironnementTara Foundation in 2006, was awardedand an international scientific consortium toCollapse by Jared Diamond.   model the impact of climate warming on the oceans. The Foundation contributes both financial support to this project and the skills of Veoliaforce experts.

We have twoIn 2008, the Foundation integrated the Group’s humanitarian aidassistance and international cooperation departments:departments, Veolia Water ForceWaterforce and Veolia Waterdev.  Veolia Waterforce was created in 1998 to assist the victims of Hurricane Mitch in Nicaragua and the Yangtze river flood in China. Its main purpose is to share expertise through itsWaterdev, within a single structure, Veoliaforce. The network of 450Veoliaforce volunteer employees.  Since its creation, Veolia Waterforce has carried out nearly 50 projectsemployees, which joined the Foundation in emergency and development activities,2008, took part in partnership with the United Nations, government institutions, local communities, NGOs and private companies. In 2007, Veolia Waterforce helped with the deployment of sevenseveral emergency humanitarian operations in 2009. The following operations this year involved volunteers from France and abroad. Following the violent earthquake in Indonesia, which lay waste to the Island of Sumatra, Veoliaforce volunteers assessed equipment needs and provided technical support for the rebuilding of damaged water infrastructures. Veoliaforce volunteers got involved in refugees camps hosting escapees of ethnic conflicts in the Central African Republic and in the North of Congo Brazzaville. In Mali, they supported a program to convey drinking water to nine villages. In Sri La nka they aided in supplying drinking water to a camp of 90,000 refugees. They got involved in Zimbabwe following a cholera epidemic and in Latin America to improve reaction speeds in the event of disasters by setting up an emergency equipment hub. For the first time, with French and foreignthe assistance of Veolia Propreté volunteers, in Sudan, Oman, Pakistan, Peru, North Korea, Mexico and Bangladesh. Veolia Waterforce also went to the Philippines, where its assistance was also called uponrequested by its main partners,UNICEF and the French Ministry of Foreign AffairsMetropolitan Waterworks and emergency medical care NGOs, to join forces in order to reinforce the capacitySewerage System to provide common actions (testsexpertise and training. The aim of materials, coordination,the mission was to organize the clean-up, clearing and collection of debris, rubbish and other waste produced by the recent cyclones which ravaged the country. Volunteers also contributed their technical expertise to development projects in over ten different countries, primarily in the water and unified procedures).wastewater treatment sector but also in the processing of plastic waste in Mauritania and with respect to heating and energy problems in Moldavia.



5152



Back to Contents


We also participate in development projects through Veolia Waterdev, an international cooperation department whose objective is to share experiences and devise, along with public entities, civil society representatives and NGOs, solutions to facilitate access to local public water and sanitation services. Veolia Waterdev can intervene in these circumstances to urge French municipalities to cooperate in a decentralized manner.  In 2007, Veolia Waterdev participated in nearly 30 projects for the rehabilitation of water production and distribution systems in 15 countries, either through technical support for decentralized support programs or through the Alliance for Development, an innovative partnership bringing together the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the French Development Agency, sanofi-aventis and the Institut Pasteur to reinforce access to water, sanitation and health in Niger, Madagascar and Vietnam.


The Veolia Environnement Institute: a scientific approach dedicated to prospective tools for the environment and sustainable development

Human management of the environment represents a major challenge that requires the mobilization of a large number of resources and the supportcommitment of the publicall stakeholders at large and close cooperation among international,local, national and local participants. To address this challenge, we createdinternational levels. This strong conviction led Veolia Environnement to create the Veolia Environnement Institute or the IVE,(VEI) in 20012001. The Institue is set up to encourage prospective reflection on a numberforward-looking analysis of issues relatingcentral themes, such as: the economic dimension of the environment; the link between health and the environment; climate change, lifestyles and the challenges of urban growth; society and the environment. This is achieved through exchanges between academe and civil society in order to sustainable development, as well asdevelop autonomous scientific expertise to progressively shedsupport Veolia Environnement’s long-term vision and improve our ability to plan ahead. Through its work, the VEI sheds light on the principal trendschallenges that will influencemark the provision of environmental management servicesEnvironmental Services sector over the next decade.  coming decades.

Through its ProspectsForesight Committee, which is composed entirely of individuals of international reputation and standing, the IVEVEI benefits from the contribution of leading externaloutside expertise on different key subjects (including climate science, public health, the economy and human sciences) while maintaining a presenceremaining firmly anchored in the daily realities of ourVeolia Environnement’s different activities.businesses. This dual capability represents both the originality and the strength of the IVE,VEI, which intends to playbe a leading rolefigure in the main environmental debates and issues of the 21st21st century. In order to achieveFor this purpose, the Institute is enlarging itscalls on a network of multidisciplinary experts thereby collecting the most relevant ideas on global trends. In 2009, the VEI strengthened its international network of academic partners, notably in particular in North Americaemerging countries and Asia, and developingdeveloped its prospective program. It has collaborated with the JPAL lab at the Departmentprogram of Economics of MIT (the Massachusetts Institute of Technology), on an air pollution study in a poor state of India.forward-looking studies. It is also working in partne rship with TERI (The Energythe Co llege of Europe (Belgium), the Wuppertal Institute (Germany) and Resources Institute) onthe Veolia Environnement delegation to European Institutions in a study of the “comparison of carbon inventory tools of European cities” that seeks to establish a unified framework. This study will subsequently be presented to the World Bank “Urban environment and climate change” working group, and advance the work being carried out by other international players (World Bank, UNEP, UN-Habitat, IDDRI) on the concept of ecological footprints and their application in two towns, one in India and one in China.defining a standard greenhouse indicator for cities. At the same time, the IVE is developing a high-levelcontinued its innovative scientific policy. In 2008, the publication policy with two new e-journals.Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society (SAPIENS),(SAPIENS) is a multidisciplinary review will publishpublishing articles from top specialists describing the latest advancementsin order to set forth recent advances in the field of sustainable development. On another note, the development andFACTS (Field Action Science) Reports review aims is a journal dedicated to developfield work, which seeks to collect, circulate and consolidatecapitalize on the knowledge and expertise gainedgood practices of people in field-work (suchthe field (NGOs, international organizations, etc.).

VEI also organizes conferences on prospective tools for the environment in France and abroad. In October 2009, the fifth conference on “Trade, Urbanization and the Environment” was held in Beijing. This subject is central to the problems facing China due to its accelerated economic development, its growing urbanization and the fragile nature and unequal distribution of international resources. This international event was organized by the Center for Human and Economic Development Studies of the School of Economics of Beijing University, a pioneer in research into human development in China. It also benefited from the support of official Chinese organizations – Ministry for the Environment, Ministry of Commerce, National Commission for Development and Reform – ensuring it good visibility among scientists, decision-makers and the media. The conference offered a for um for exchange between representatives of the academic world, public authorities, industry and civil society to discuss the interaction of trade and the environment and urbanism and the environment, as that conducted by NGOswell as more specific aspects such as “green trade policies”, trade and institutions)climate change, sustainable cities, health and has thus facilitated progress towardsthe urban environment. Conference speakers from China (Zhou Qifeng, President of Beijing University, Qiu Baoxing, Vice-Minister of Construction and Pan Jiahua, Academy of Science) and around the world (Ra Jin-Goo, Deputy Mayor of Seoul, Armatya Sen, Nobel Economics prize laureate, Manfred Fischedick, Vice-President of the Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy) shared their analyses of Chinese realities and priorities and contributed their insight to provide a larger understandingcomprehensive assessment of these actions while improving their efficiency.challenges.

These efforts should provide us withTogether, the work undertaken by the VEI forms a forumdiscussion platform for discussion and the exchange of ideas about theexchanges on major environmental, economic and social issues of today, in orderthat will be called on to respond tosatisfy the changing needsdemands of civil society.

As of the date hereof,of this annual report on Form 20-F, the members of the IVE’s ProspectsIVE Foresight Committee are: Amartya Sen (India), economist, winner of the Nobel Prize for Economics in 1998, professor of political economics and economics at Lamont University and professor of philosophy at Harvard University;had seven members: Hélène Ahrweiler, historian, presidentPresident of the University of Europe and ana social and human sciences expert foradvisor to UNESCO, on human and social sciences;Harvey Fineberg, President of the United States Institute of Medecine, Philippe Kourilsky, biologist, Directormember of Research at the Centre nationale de recherche scientifique (CNRS)Academy of Sciences and professor at the Collège de France; Pierre-MarcFrance, Pierre Marc Johnson, (Canada), attorney,lawyer and physician ex-primeand former prime minister of Quebec, Canada, and expert on environmental matters; Harvey Fineberg (USA),a specialist in major environment challenges, Rajendra K. Pachauri, President of the InstituteGIEC, 2007 Nobel Peace prize laureate and Director-General of Medicine of the National Academy of Science of the United States; and Ms. ManphelaTERI, Mamphela Ramphele, (South Africa), physician and anthropologist, former presidentPresident of the University of Cape Town and former chairmanDirector-General of the World Bank.

The IVE also organizes international conferences in FranceBank and abroad.  In 2007 the fourth conference was held in Montreal, on the topicAmartya Sen, economist,1998 Nobel prize laureate and professor of “The Climate 2050 – Technologicaleconomics and Political Solutions”. Organized with the help of two North American partners, the Table Center on Global Climate Change (USA) and the National Round Table on the Economy and the Environment (Canada), this event, held in October, brought together almost 400 participants from 12 countries. Under the patronage of Pierre Marc Johnson, Jean Charest, the Prime Minister of Quebec, Thierry Vandal, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Hydro-Québec and Sheila Watt Cloutier, the Inuit representative and Nobel Peace Prize nominee, were the guests of honor of the opening ceremony. The fifth IVE conference, to be held in late 2008 or early 2009, is expected to be in Abu Dhabi, the United Arab Emirates, on the theme of the environment in an urban setting, in collaboration with the Chairman of the Middle Eastern and Mediterranean Political Studies Institute and a local partner with expertise on this subject.philosophy at Harvard Univ ersity.



5253



Back to Contents


Environmental Compliance (Information regarding article 116 of the French NRE Law)

As a specialist in environmental management services, we are naturally concerned about the environmental consequences of each of our activities,businesses, both in France and worldwide. In this respect, we consistently endeavorseek to comply with applicable regulations, to meet the needs and requestsdemands of our clientscustomers and to optimize the techniques we implement. To illustrate our commitment, wePursuant to the provisions of the NRE Law (French law n°2001-420 of May 15, 2001) and in addition to the description of the Company’s businesses provided above and the financial statements provided below, Veolia Environnement therefore considers it appropriate to highlight below some of the more significant environmental actions that we have undertaken regardless ofwithout any regulatory or contractual obligation to do so. For further information on our sustainable development policy and actions, the information below should be read together with o ur 2009 Sustainable Development Report.

Set forth below are summaries ofAs concerns the use of water resources, raw materials and energy, measures implemented to improve energy efficiency and the use of renewable energy measures,energies, conditions of use of ground soil, and measures to limit air, water and soil pollution, noise and noise pollution:olfactory pollution and waste, the following measures should be noted:

Water

Use of Water Resources

We preserve water resources by working to prevent wasteful usage in our own installations and in those of our clients.customers. In this respect, the continued implementationprogressive roll-out of our environmental management system provides, in particular, for the monitoring of water consumption and quality in all of our activities. Our action plan reflectsAction plans reflect two primary concerns: increased monitoring of the health quality of water destinedintended for human consumption and controllingthe control of leaks in cold water distribution networks (raw or treated) and leaks in domestic hot water production networks. InDuring 2004, we installed an indicator to monitor the quality and compliance with regulatory standards of our drinking water. Our industrial water consumption amounted to 452.6541.7 million cubic meters in 2007.

2009. Climate changes in certain regions of the world heighten strains on water resources. We study and promote techniques through whichw hich alternative resources are used, such as the production of drinking water by desalination of seawater and the production of water for industry or farm irrigation by recycling wastewater. These developments are conducted strictly in close association with local authorities, regulatory proceedingsbodies and the scientific community.

Water pollution

99.3%98.5% of Veolia Propreté’s landfillslandfill sites are equipped with treatment stations for leachate (water that percolates through stored waste).

Waste waterWastewater

Our wastewater treatment efficiency, measured at biological treatment stations with a capacity greater than 50,000 EH,inhabitant equivalents, reached 90%91.6% in 2007.2009.

Energy – Energy efficiency and the use of renewable energies

We contribute to the reduction of primary energy consumption. Dalkia optimizes energy management for more than 100,000118,000 energy installations around the world,worldwide, from municipalurban heating networks to housing, commercial or industrial building boilers. Optimizing the energy efficiency of such thermal installations relies upon the quality of their operationsfocuses on operating and maintenance as well as uponquality and their modernization.

Dalkia’s strong growth emphasizes the use of heatingHeating networks that offer optimized energy performances by concentrating production on a single site and involving co-generation.co–generation (the simultaneous production of thermal energy and electricity) represent strong growth areas for Dalkia. Efforts in the renewable energy field includeaffect all of our activities.businesses. We are not only developing ways to use biomass, geothermal and solar energy (Dalkia),offerings, but we are also capturing energy from incineration facilitiesplants and biogas from landfills.landfill sites.

Veolia Transport continues to pursue its objective of providingprovide environmental performance training to 90% of its public transport drivers, during the first five years of their careers.  This training effort enables uswith as a result not only to enhance passengers’enhancement passenger comfort and limitreduced polluting emissions, but also to achieve significant fuel economy.  In 2007, we continued employee training activities, now facilitated by our campus.savings.

Our total energy consumption amounted to 117.59171.89 million MWh in 2007,2009, as a result of the growthdevelopment of our business.activities.



5354



Back to Contents


Use of soils

SinceIn 2003, we have combinedintegrated all activities relating to the treatment and recovery of sludge intowithin a single entity, (SEDE Environment).SEDE Environnement. As a result, we have a specificprecise, global and integrated overview of sludge management options, allowing usit to optimize ourits agricultural recovery in particular.

We have pursuedcontinue our efforts to manage the quality of waste in the sewage networks and actedacts upstream to enhance the quality of sludge produced by implementing pollutant controls in our wastewater treatment networks (through ourits Actipol method). Veolia Eau has finalized a reference and certification systemguidelines defining therequirements applicable requirements for a sewage systemto wastewater treatment systems for the production of quality sludge to be used as compost.  In addition,in agriculture. Upstream, we promote the agricultural recovery of sludge through composting and engage an independent certifying body to audit ourits composting and agricultural recovery networks.

This recovery is conducted in conjunction with the agricultural recovery of the portion usable for fertilization fromfermentable fraction of household waste.

We produced 1,006.1 thousands of1,293.6 thousand tons of compost in 2007, 45.8%2009. 54% of whichsludge produced was eligible to be used in agricultural activities.

We have initiated a quality enhancement program for organic material produced from organic waste and a program to evaluate theirour agricultural impact (the Quali-Agro program led by CRPE – our center for research on wastefor environmental and energy services)services - in coordination with the INRA.INRA). We are also active in the rehabilitation of polluted soils. Relying onUsing several processes, including thermal absorption, Veolia Propreté processes almost all of the pollutants present in the soil at industrial sites.

Air Pollution

Limiting Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Certain of Dalkia’s activities (in particular its combustion installations with thermal output greater than 20 MW) are subject to the provisions of European Directivedirective 2003/87/EC of October 13, 2003, which establishes a quota exchange systeman allowance trading scheme for carbon gas emissions. This system has been in place among EU member states since the beginning of 2005.

Direct and indirect (energy consumption-related) greenhouse gas emissions in the European Union, as amended by directive 2009/29/EC dated April 26, 2009. Direct emissions (including biogas discharges) ongenerated at landfill sites) and indirect emissions (linked to energy use and heating purchases) at sites that we managed by us in 20072009 amounted to 42.849.4 million tons of CO2 (carbon dioxide) equivalent, due to growth inthe development of our business. businesses.

Given the differing national and international methods for measuring the production and emission of methane at waste landfills,landfill sites, we are unable to provide a reliable measure at this time. We haveWithin this context, we decided to further our knowledge of measuring methods, notably through participating in working groups oforganized by international authorities (WBCSD and WRI). The work ofWork on elaborating and attempting to reconcile the different methods should make it easierlead to identifythe identification of a single method, which couldcan serve as a referencebenchmark for all of ourVeolia Propreté sites and allow for a homogenousenable uniform and comparable reporting method.  reporting.

We are also contributingcontributed to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, bothfirstly by reducing our direct emissions and secondly by avoiding emissions which would have been producedoccurred without Veolia Environmental Services.the intervention of our businesses. Among ourthe Group’s actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, Veolia Environmental ServicesPropreté continues its efforts to implement and optimize biogas collection and recovery systems inat its landfills. 90landfill sites. Ninety-four waste landfillslandfill sites for which we control investmentsinvestment are equipped with biogas collection and biogas recoveryprocessing systems. In 2007,2009, our efforts contributed to an overalla total decrease in emissions of 23.4 million tons of CO2.

Furthermore, we actively participate in the flexibility mechanisms outlined in the Kyoto protocol, which came into force on February 16, 2005. Veolia Propreté participates in the reduction of 24.71 million tons.greenhouse gas emissions with Clean Development Mechanism (CDP) projects in Brazil, Mexico and Egypt for biogas collection and recovery systems.

Other Emissions

Installations that we operateoperated by us mainly emit sulfur and nitrogen oxides (SOXx and NOX), carbon monoxide (CO), volatile organic compounds and dust. Emissions of SOXx from waste incineration units (hazardous and non-hazardous)non-hazardous waste) amounted to approximately 9091 grams per ton of incinerated waste in 2007.  

2009, as a result a result of our growth by acquisition of new installations whose performance is still in the process if being optimized. In particular, Veolia Transport is pursuing research, in partnership with ADEME, is performing research to identifyinto identifying and assess the systems inassessing the market capable of reducing thesystems best able to reduce NOXx emittedemissions by its busesbus and coaches.coach fleet.



55



Back to Contents


We attemptare committed to reducereducing our emissions further below regulatory minimumsrequirements by (i) improving the treatment of air emissions and developing better technologies (treatment of incineration fumessmoke by Veolia Propreté, improvement of transportationreduction in vehicle emissions forby Veolia Transport, low NOx-emitting -emission combustion technologies forin Dalkia) and (ii) reducing consumption and encouraging the use of cleaner fuels (low-sulfur fuel oil and coal, natural gas, GNVLNG for combustion installations and vehicles and electric or electric cars)hybrid vehicles).



54



Back to Contents


Furthermore, Veolia Transport continues to pursue its efforts to reduce polluting emissions (CO,2, hydrocarbons and HC, particles) from its fleet of passenger vehicles. In 2006, aA new scope of referencebenchmark was defined, corresponding to 80% of its 2005the 2009 bus and coach fleet. EmissionsEmission reduction targets have beenwere set for the end of 2008:2011: 8% for carbon monoxide unit emissions (CO), 14%24% for hydrocarbons (HC) and 15%27% for particles. Veolia Transport also continuesremains committed to pursue its commitment to train itsproviding drivers inwith environmental performance. Theseperformance training, efforts allow not only for better comfort for passengers andwhich notably enables a reduction in polluting emissions but also for substantial gas savings to be achieved.emissions. In 2007,2008, the number of employees being trainedhaving received training increased to 55.9%61%.

With respectregards to NOx emissions, over the last few years Dalkia has carried out an evaluation program relating tocovering available emissions reduction technologies (including fuel(fuel oil low emissions, recycling of fumes, air staging, andterracing, combustion modeling)modeling, etc.). The relative stability of this indicator compared to 2008 is based on the fact that it is now measured on a three year basis, rather than the five-year basis used previously. Moreover, the three years used have experienced relatively low growth.

Veolia Propreté has developed a semi-permanent dioxin emissionsemission control method during waste incineration, allowing for a control of the flow of pollutants emitted throughout the year. We offer this reliable and efficient measurement technique to all of our clients.


customers.

Noise and olfactiveolfactory pollution


We have also developed new treatmentprocessing and storage techniques for odors, particularly in wastewater treatment plants and landfillslandfill sites for household waste. We also useuses new and more silent technologies in some of our installations, including special wall coatings, sound traps and exhaust gas exit silencers for cogeneration installations orand transport vehicles.


Preserving biological balance, natural environments and protected animal and plant species

We includedintegrated the protection of biodiversity ininto the first undertaking of our Sustainable Development Charter and since 2004 have developed an approach based on the nature of our businesses’ impactbusiness impacts and the implementation of ourintegrated management into the Environmental Management System.

To distinguish ouridentify its impact, we relycall on an internal expert who is primarily responsible for the analysis ofanalyzing biological tools used to evaluate the ecological state of marine and land life. Moreover, we work with a number of universities and institutions in order to further ourits knowledge through innovative research programs covering the interactions between ourinteraction of its activities and the functioning of ecosystems.

We also carry out a number of management plans with the aim of informing our employeesmeasures aimed at raising employee awareness and promoting best practices. Among the latter,Such measures include the Geographical Biodiversity Information System, allows us to visualizewhich enables the locationslocation of ecological zones of interest around our main facilities (Hotspot ofto be precisely identified in relation to ecological hotspots (identified by the International Conservation Organization).

In order to improve the structure of ourits policies, we are currently working on defining a methodology allowingenabling sites to carry out their own biodiversity diagnosticsappraisals and to implement an appropriate action plans.plan.

In 2008, we entered into a partnership with the French Committee of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). The primary aim of this partnership will be to assist us with the integration of biodiversity into our corporate strategy, strengthen our R&D strategic cap thanks to a network of recognized experts and participate in raising awareness among our employees through training measures. IUCN France comprises 44 members (government ministries, public institutions and NGOs) and a network of approximately 250 experts. At the international level, IUCN has been a United Nations observer since 1999.

In France, numerous activities fall under the control of either the ICPE regime (facilities classified for environmental protection) or its equivalent. Therefore, all business development is conducted in tandem with the preparation of environmental impact studies concerning very precise aspects of floracomprising a highly detailed section on animal and fauna.plant life. The management of environmental impactthese impacts is, accordingly, a constant preoccupationconcern for the operating staff of our different business operations (including wastebusinesses (waste treatment, decontamination stations, combustion facilities, and railway depositories)rolling stock depots, etc.).



56



Back to Contents



EvaluationEnvironmental evaluation or certification regarding the environment

Our activities have been subject to environmental certification, both external (ISO) and internal, for a long time. In 2002,2008, based on a wider application scope encompassing Veolia Propreté’s waste collection and cleaning businesses, we committedundertook to implementingimplement an environmental management system covering 80%in 85% of ourrelevant activities by the end of 2008.2011. Subject to the circumstances of each of the entities concerned, this is a voluntary step resulting inapproach leads to the general application of the ISO 14001 certification standards. WeSome 21,826 of our sites are currently have 939 sites covered by an ISO 14001 certification.



55



Back to Contents


certified.

Compliance with applicable legal and regulatory provisions

Our environmental management system includes, among other things, an environmental audit program that allows us to monitor our sites’the regulatory compliance of sites, as well as their compliance with contractual obligations and groupour standards. We have defined a general framework to ensure the consistency of the audit systems developed by our divisions, andits Divisions, each of our divisionswhich remains responsible for the definition and implementation of its own system. We surpassed our goalBased on this definition, we set an objective of conductingattaining, between now and 2011, 95% regulatory compliance in “priority installations” audited in the preceding 5 years. As of December 31, 2009, increased by 6%and the rate of regulatory compliance audits for 80% of priority sites in 2005.  carried out reached 87%.

Priority sites are drinking water production sites and urban wastewater treatment stations,plants, waste treatmentprocessing sites, Dalkia’sDalkia classified installations and several ofcertain Veolia Transport’s transportationTransport centers.  By the end of 2008, 100% of our primary facilities will be subject to a regulatory compliance audit. These facilities are the most sensitive to environmental impacts.  As of December 31, 2007, 89.4% of the primary facilities were subject to a statutory audit for compliance.

Expenses incurredInvestments undertaken to preserve the environment

Given the nature of ourits services, a large majority of our expenditures and investments have a direct impact on the environment. Our capital expendituresindustrial investments amounted to €2.642 billion€2,493 million in 2007, which includes not only investments of a contractual nature, but also expenses incurred for research2009 and development,included growth and maintenance investments. We invested in employee training, our certification programprograms and the implementation of ourthe environmental management system. Our Research and Development budget was also renewed (see note 19 to the consolidated financial statements). Given the current economic environment, we are implementing a restrictive investment policy which sharply reduces our financial investments without jepordizing industrial investments or investments called for by contractual commitments. The decrease in investments primarily concerned Veolia Propreté.

PreventionAs concerns the use of internal environmental management services, training and information for employees on the environment, methods for reducing environmental risks and the structure implemented to handle accidents with an impact beyond the confines of the Company, the following neasures should be noted:

In addition to the measures described above for the reduction of environmental risks, such as research and development or employee training, we have formedset up an environmental performance department.Environmental Performance Department. This department’s principal missionrole is the deploymentroll-out and management of the Environmental Management System, thereby encouraging consistent objectives and actions among our divisionsthe Divisions as well as information sharing and best practices. It leadsheads an environmental management committee, composedEnvironmental Management Committee, comprised of representatives of all of our divisionsDivisions and representatives from the sustainable development department.Sustainable Development Department. A steering committee, made up of a number of members of theSteering Committee, headed by executive committeemanagement and comprising an Executive Committee member from each divisionDivision and representatives from various departments (particularly ourthe sustainable development, legal and communicationsR&D departments) will also be formed to approve environmentalthe strategic cap adopted for envi ronmental management strategy and to report to our executive committeeExecutive Committee on an annual basis. In addition, our risk department is in charge of identifying, evaluatingassessing and managing risks. It relies on our risk committeethe work of the Group Risk Committee.

We have also establishedset up crisis management procedures that cover environmental crisis management, including, in particular, on-call and alarmalert systems at national and international levels, that would allowenabling any necessary measures to be taken as soon as possible.on a timely basis.

ReservesProvisions for site closure and guarantees for environmental riskspost-closure costs

As of December 31, 2007, our accrued reserves2009, provisions for site remediation amounted to €539.5closure and post-closure costs (encompassing provisions for site restoration, the dismantling of installations and environmental risks) totaled €686.3 million.

Indemnities and damages

57



Back to Contents


Compensation paid in 2007 for2009 in execution of legal decisions relating to the environment and actions taken to repair environmental claims pursuant to court ordersdamage

ReservesProvisions for litigation consummatedused in 2007 amounted to €89.82009 totaled €88.5 million, including all types of litigation (tax, employment and other litigation).

International environmental targets

In 2007,The roll-out of the Environmental Management System described above, continued to expand, reaching almost 75%in 2009 and now covers 78% of our subsidiaries worldwide.  We are pursuing the goal of extending it to 80% of our relevant businesses by the end of 2008.sites.

Intellectual Property

We own a significant number of patentsbrands, including the “Veolia” brand. Since November 2005, we have adopted a new brand strategy aimed at uniting the Water, Environmental Services and trademarksTransportation Divisions under the Veolia banner. Three of our Divisions remain identifiable according to their business descriptions: “Water”, “Environmental Services” or “Transportation”, while our Energy Services Division is mainly known under the name “Dalkia”. As a result, the companies at the head of the Water, Environmental Services and Transportation Divisions, as well as most companies in Francethe countries and other countries aroundregions where the world thatGroup is based, are progressively modifying their corporate names in order to include the word “Veolia”. This strategy, as implemented by our senior management, illustrates our desire to increase the global consistency of valueour Di visions and our visibility, by strengthening our identity and global culture based on our service values. Accordingly, the “Veolia” brand has become an international reference for trust, reliability and expertise in the Environmental Services sector.

Innovation is essential to our business.  However, we believe thatgrowth and profitability. We hold a portfolio of patents protecting the diversityknow-how of our patentsWater, Environmental Services, Transportation and trademarks does not make anyEnergy Services Divisions and also innovative discoveries of our activitiesResearch Department. With this patent portfolio and the associated expertise, we set ourselves apart from the competition and strengthen our position as a reference for Environmental Services.

We believe our business is not dependent on the existence or validity of one or several of these patents nor on any contract covering one or more intellectual property rights. Furthermore, we are not dependent on any one of these patentscustomer, major license or trademarks individually. Moreover, we believe that our activities are not materially dependent on any one license that we may own, or on any one industrial, commercial or financingfinancial supply contract. We also believe that we are not materially dependent upon any particular contract or client.



56



Back to Contents


Marketing

We market our products and services by continuously offering to provide a more comprehensive range of environmental services to clients.  We often sell our products and services by responding to requests for consultations. These may be highly regulated events when it comes to a public authority conducting a public bid tender, but generally we are able in such situations to take advantage of our reputation and know-how and propose a solution that is best adapted to a client’s needs.  In the absence of a formal bidding procedure, which is generally the rule for commercial services clients, we analyze the environmental service needs of prospective clients and demonstrate to them how our services could improve the efficiency of their operations.  See “— Contracts.” For more information regarding marketing efforts by each of our divisions, see “— Our Se rvices.”

Seasonality

Because of the diverse nature of our operations and our worldwide presence, our business is typically not subject to material seasonal variations. Our results are only slightly affected globally. Nonetheless, certainCertain of our businesses are subject to seasonal variation.variations. Dalkia realizesgenerates the bulk of its operating results in the first and fourth quarters of the year, corresponding to periods in which heating is used in Europe. In our water division,the Water sector, household water consumption and the related wastewater treatment services tend to be higher between May and September in the northernNorthern hemisphere, where Veolia Eau conducts most of its activities. InFinally, in transportation, SNCM’s activity is strongest in the summer season. Thanks to the diverse nature of our operations and our worldwide presence, our results are, in general, not significantly affected by seasonal variations.

Raw Materials

We purchase raw materials on a worldwide basis from numerous suppliers. We sometimes secureGiven our supply of materials through medium-termbusiness activites (Water, Environmental Services, Energy and long-term contracts. We have not experienced difficultiesTransportation), changes in obtaining sufficient amounts of raw materials and supplies in recent years and we do not have any reason to anticipate any material difficulties in the future.  However, the price of raw materials (mainly fuel and supplies may vary substantially.natural gas prices) and recycled materials (paper, cardboard, iron and non-ferous metals) can have an effect of our different Divisions.

Fuel prices (mainly gas and coal) can be subject to significant fluctuations. Energy prices have fluctuated widely in the past few years. After a lull at the end of 2006, the price of a barrel of Brent oil doubled in price per barrelcrude nearly tripled from its lowest levellow in January 2007 (US$49)49.00) to its pricehigh in Februarythe summer of 2008 (US$101)(US $145), due in part tospurred by fears of potential supply problems in light of the geopolitical tensions inwithin the major oil producing countries (Nigeria, Venezuela) and Venezuela), as well as OPEC’sthe reluctance of OPEC (Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries) to raise its production quotas to respondin response to strong global growth in 2007.  Althoughgrowth. During the slowdown infourth quarter of 2008, following the American economy is likely to contain any further price volatility,eruption of the market expectsglobal economic crisis, the price per barrelof crude oil plummeted, falling in just two months to remain high.

We were able to limitbelow its level at the impactbeginning of the riseyear. In 2009, despite a twofold increase in the price of raw energy materials on resultscrude oil (US$78.30 as of December 31, 2009) compar ed to its low in 2007 since our contracts typically containFebruary 2009 (US$39.50), the average price adjustment and/or indexing provisions designed to compensate us for increasesof North Sea Brent crude oil in 2009 (US$61.90) remained below that of 2008 (US$97.20). This change in the costprice of providing our services.  Such provisions include indexing clausesBrent crude oil not only had an effect on fuel prices, but also on gas prices (particularly in France, where changes in STS gas prices track petroleum prices with a three month lag). Thus average 2009 French gas prices also went down by about €9/MW compared to 2008, which represents a decreased of 27%. The general consensus of opinion among energy product analysts is, however, that take into account the variation of certain parameters, review clausesenergy price will increase significantly in the caselong-term, due to the increasing rarity of known oil reserves, a marked increase in extraction costs and the need to adopt new energy sources in response to growing environmental requirements. However, the timing of this upturn is difficult to forecast, due to the limited visibility of market participants regarding economic growth. Therefore, the possibility of a further drop in commodity prices cannot b e excluded. In any event, as in 2008 and 2009, energy prices should remain volatile in 2010.



58



Back to Contents


In this context of volatile raw materials commodity markets, Veolia Environnement’s businesses are not, and should not in the future, be materially affected in the long-term by an increase in certain parameters above a given level, hardshipcosts, the availability of fuel or fluctuations in the price of other raw materials. The contracts entered into by Veolia Environnement generally include price review and/or indexation clauses (unforeseeable changes duewhich enable it to extraordinary circumstances) or re-adjustment clauses. These provisions therefore assist us in passing along a portionpass on the majority of any riseincreases in energycommodity or raw materialfuel prices to clients (subjectthe price of services sold to customers, even if this may be performed with a possible time period in which we must wait to assess the impact of a price adjustment).delay.

In the transportation division,Transportation Division, numerous contracts contain indexing clauses that take variationsfluctuations in fuel costs into account, which significantly reducesreducing the impact of a rise or fall in fuel prices. In certain contracts, especially those involvingcontracts entered into in the United States, we areVeolia Environnement is entitled to full compensation in the event of risinga rise in fuel prices. Approximately 70% of costs are covered by contractual indexing clauses. For those contracts not containing indexing clauses, a fuel hedging policy was implemented in 2008 to manage fluctuations in fuel costs. The Group uses derivative instruments for this purpose, whose characteristics (notional amounts and maturity) are defined in accordance with forecast fuel requirements (based on firm orders or highly probable forecast flows). The majority of derivatives used are swaps.

In the waste management division,Environmental Services Division, collection services involving non-hazardous solid and liquid waste are the most sensitive to fluctuations in fuel prices. However, for clientscustomers that have contracts with us,Veolia Environnement, indexing clauses in their contracts generally allow usthe Company to pass alongon a significant portion of our increaseincreases in such costs into the prices we charge to clients.charged. Approximately two-thirds of costs are covered contractually. For clientscustomers not bound by contract, increases in fuel costs are either fully or partially passed along to themon through an updating ofincrease in fees or through negotiation.

In the Transportation and Environmental Services Divisions, the fall in fuel prices in 2009 compared to 2008 had a positive impact on fuel expenses of approximately €67 million in 2009, including the cost of swap hedging arrangements.

In the Energy Services Division, given the long-term nature of the contract terms and terms of supply agreements, the changes in energy services division,prices may have different affects depending on the situationzones in which Dalkia intervenes. At the Energy Services Division level, it has an overall negative impact on revenue of €140 million; this translates, however, to a negative effect in France and the United States, but a positive impact in Central Europe and the Baltic States.

A portion of Environmental Services Division revenue is generated by its sorting-recycling and trading businesses, which are particularly sensitive to fluctuations in the price of secondary raw materials (paper, cardboard, ferrous and non-ferrous metal). The economic crisis in 2009 impacted demand for recycled materials, and the average annual price of these secondary materials fell substantially compared to 2008, despite a progressive rise in paper and cardboard prices from the third quarter of 2009. The results of the Environmental Services Division were therefore impacted in 2009 by the substantial fall in the price of secondary raw materials compared to 2008.

In the other Divisions, as part of supply management and cost optimization measures, certain Group subsidiaries may be required, depending on their businesses, to contract forward purchases or sales of commodities (gas, electricity).

The Group also entered into long-term contracts for the purchase of gas, coal, electricity and biomass in order to secure its supply chain. The majority of these commitments is reciprocal, with the third parties concerned required to deliver the quantities indicated in these contracts and the Group obliged to take them.

Finally, with respect to combustible materials used for its building activities, is similarparticularly in the Water Division, the Group may also purchase financial instruments to that described above. With respecthedge against increases in the price of nickel and copper notably. For further information, please refer to gas supplies in particular,our Consolidated Financial Statements, particularly Note 29.1.3 to the deregulation of the market has not altered our use of indexing clauses in our contracts. We have developed the skills necessary to manage and optimize our gas supplies within the new market environment.consolidated financial statements.



5759



Back to Contents


Insurance

Objectives of Insurance Procurement Policy

Our insurance procurement policy, for all of our operating divisionsDivisions, has the following objectives:

maintainingsubscribing common insurance policies to establishimplement a coherent risk transfer and coverage policy in orderdesigned to maximize economies of scale, while taking into account the specificitiesspecific characteristics of ourthe Group’s businesses and legal or contractual constraints; and

optimizing the thresholds and the means for accessing the insurance or reinsurance markets through use of appropriate deductibles.

In 2007, we continued to seek to optimize the amount of insurance premiums we paid to outside insurers.

Implementation of Insurance Procurement Policy

Policy

Our strategy with respect toThe aim of Veolia Environnement’s insurance policy is to (i) establishimplement a global insurance coverage policy to cover our activities,encompassing all Group businesses, based in particularnotably on the needs expressed by our subsidiaries, (ii) select and sign contractspolicies with outsideexternal providers (such as brokers,(brokers, insurers, loss adjusters)adjusters, etc.), (iii) manage consolidated subsidiaries specializing in insurance or reinsurance coverage, and (iv) leadmanage and coordinate the network of insurance managers present among our principalin the main subsidiaries.

Implementation

The implementationpolicy of ancovering risks through insurance coverage policy aimed at covering risk is carried outimplemented in coordination with ourVeolia Environnement’s global risk management process. Implementation is affected bytakes into account the insurability of risks related to ourassociated with Veolia Environnement’s activities, by the market availability of insurance and reinsurance coverage on the market and by the relationship between premiums andproposed compared with the level of coverage, exclusions, limits, sub-limits and deductibles.

In 2007, we undertookThe main actions principally related to:undertaken in 2009 primarily concerned:

the readjustmentextension, at equivalent or improved terms and conditions, of retention levels (retained risk) based on an analysis of risksinsurance programs covering property damage and loss history and an evaluation of the costs and coverage proposed by insurers;operating losses,

the reinforcementcontinuation of efforts to identify, prevent and protect against risks, thanks in particular tothrough a rating system for the “property damage and business interruption” risk profile forof our most important facilities aroundthroughout the world;

the communicationongoing roll-out of detailed information regarding our company to the insurance and reinsurance markets;

the renegotiation of general liability and property coverage; and

extending our Group’s coverage; andGroup programs;

the organization of broker services for the placement and administration of ourGroup insurance programs.



60



Back to Contents


Main Group Insurance Policies

General Liability

AThe general civilthird-party liability and environmental damage program was subscribed torenegotiated on July 1, 2005, around2008, for the whole world (excluding the U.S. and Canada) for a period of three years. PrincipalInitial coverage isof up to €50€100 million per claim and per year. Foryear was subscribed. In the U.S. and Canada, differentseveral contracts cover generalthird-party liability and environmental damage to the environment on behalf offor Group subsidiaries, based on local conditions, in an amount of up to US$a maximum of U.S.$50 million per claim and per year.

For all Group subsidiaries worldwide, an insurance program provides excess coverage forof up to US$450€400 million thereby giving us totalper claim and per year, in addition to the basic coverage of US$500€100 million throughoutoutside the insurance period.U.S. and Canada and of €450 million in the U.S. and Canada in addition to the basic coverage of U.S.$50 million in these countries. This program includes coverage forencompasses liability resulting from environmental liability for damage sustained by third parties as a result of a sudden and accidental event.



58



Back to Contents


OurThird-party liability coverage for terrorism policy was renewed under ourterrorist acts is included in the general liability program, which was set-up for three years on July 1, 2007 for a twelve-month period2008, with a total coverage of US$165up to €150 million per claim and per year.year, excluding the U.S. and Canada. Coverage for the U.S. and Canada is €100 million per claim and per year, in addition to coverage of U.S.$50 million.

Further, certainCertain activities, such as a maritime transport, automobile and construction, have their own specific insurance policies.

Property Damage and Business Interruption Policies

All four of our divisions maintainVeolia Environnement Divisions are covered by property damage insurance policies, to cover assets thatinsuring the installations they own as well as those that they operate on behalf of clients. Our globalcustomers. The Group insurance program provides either “business interruption” coverage or “additional cost of working”operating cost” coverage depending on such subsidiaries’ exposure and their capacityeach subsidiary’s ability to use internal or external solutions to ensure service continuity. These policies contain standard insurance market terms.

The Group damage insurance program, initially set-up on January 1, 2007 for a period of three years, was extended to January 1, 2012 to maintain existing competitive insurance coverage.

The level of premiums, deductibles and sub-limits for exceptional socio-political or natural events reflects the terms proposed, or sometimes imposed,required, by insurers in the markets in which the risk is underwritten. Group insurance coverage implemented on January 1, 2007 (for a term of three years) carries a limit per claimevent of up to €300 million.million per claim. Some of this coverage contains furtherincludes additional sub-limits per claim or per yea r.year.

Self-Insured Retention and Deductibles

For any insured claim or loss, we remainVeolia Environnement remains liable for the deductible amount set out in the relevant policy. TheThis amount may range from several thousand euros to more than one million euros.

In 2007, Codeve Insurance Company Limited, our insuranceSince January 1, 2009, the Group self-insurance system is entirely based on its reinsurance subsidiary, had a retention (retained risk)Veolia Environnement Services-Ré, which retains self-insured risk of €2.5€1.5 million per claim for the coverage of third-party liability risk and €2.5 million per clam for the coverage of property damage risk and consequentialresulting financial losses, and €5 million for insurance of general liabilities.

Regardinglosses. For both property damage and generalthird-party liability, Codeve Insurance Company LimitedVeolia Environnement Services-Ré has put in placeset-up reinsurance contracts in orderpolicies to limit its exposure to frequency risks (“stop loss”-type contracts) and risks tied to intensity (excess claim-type(excess-type contracts).

In general, theThe insurance coveragepolicy described above is constantly evolves as a functionchanging in response to the ongoing appraisal of ongoing risk evaluation,risks, market conditions and available insurance coverage available.capacity. We attemptseek to have our knownensure that the main accidental and operating risks brought to our attention are covered by the insurance whenmarkets, where insurance is available on the market and it is economically feasible to do so. However, we cannot guarantee that we will not suffer damages or losses that are not fully or partially covered by insurance.



61



Back to Contents


ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

Our companyCompany is divided into four operating divisionsDivisions corresponding to each of our four business segments and a number of centralized corporate departments that lead and coordinate the actions of teams present in each of the four operating divisions. We believe that this organizational structure encourages the coherent development of our groupGroup by reinforcing its identity, maintaining solidarity and cohesion, favoring economies of scale and encouraging professionalism through the sharing of best practices.

See “—Item 4: “Information on the Company — History and Development of the Company” for a description of the history of the creation of our organizational structure.



59



Back to Contents


PROPERTY, PLANTSPLANT AND EQUIPMENT

We useVeolia Environnement uses various assets and equipment in order tofor the conduct ourof its activities, with respect toover which we have very differentit exercises extremely diverse rights.

In the courseThe total gross value of our non-current assets (excluding other intangible assets) as of December 31, 2009 was €30,824.3 million (net value of €18,659 million as of December 31, 2009, representing 38% of total consolidated assets), compared to €30,239 million as of December 31, 2008 (net value of €18,816 million).

Under concession businesses,arrangements, we must ensure the provision ofprovide public interest services (such as distribution(distribution of drinking water and heat, transportpublic transportation networks, or household waste collection, services),etc.) to communities, in return for payment for theof services rendered. We usually manage these collective services (also referred to as general interest services, general economic interest services orand public services) under contracts signedentered into at the request of public entities that maintainkeep the control of assets relatingused to perform such collective services. These concession contractsConcession arrangements are characterized by the transfer of an operating rightrights for a fixed term, under the control of thea public authorities, through appropriateauthority, and are performed using special-purpose installations built by usthat we build or putthat are placed at our disposal whethereither free of charge or not. These installationsfor consideration. Installations normally consist of pipelines, water treatment and purification plants, and pumps , etc. in our water division,the Water Division, incineration plants in our environme ntal services division,the Environmental Services Division, and urban heating networks and heating and co-generation plants in our energy services division.  the Energy Services Division.

We are usuallygenerally contractually bound to maintain and repair installation assets managed under these public service contracts. If needed, theWhen necessary, related repair and maintenance costs are covered by a depositprovided via provisions for contractual commitments in the event of delays in the performance of work. The nature and durationextent of the Group’s rights acquired and our obligations in respect ofunder these different contracts differ depending on the nature ofvary according to the public services we provide.rendered by the different Group businesses.

Within the scope of ourUnder outsourcing contracts with industrial clients, BOT (Build, Operate, Transfer) contracts or incineration or co-generationcogeneration contracts, we may grant our clients a usercustomers the right forto use a group of assets in return for rent included in the general payment of the contract. Under thetotal contract remuneration. Pursuant to IFRIC4, standard, we therebythus become a credit-lessorlessor with respect to our clients.customers. The corresponding assets are therefore recorded in the consolidated balance sheet as operating financial assets.

In some cases, we areThe Group is also the fulloutright owner of industrial installations, mainlyin particular for activities undertaken outside of globalcomprehensive contracts in our waste management division (CSDUs, storage centers for ultimate wastethe Environmental Services Division (landfill sites and special waste treatmentprocessing plants), in our energy services divisionthe Energy Services Division (co-generation plants) and in our transportation divisionthe Transportation Division (buses, boats and trains). These assets are recordedclassified in the consolidated balance sheet as tangible assets.

property, plant and equipment. Our property, plantsplant and equipment are subject to certain charges, such as maintenance and repair costs and closure or post-closure costs. We

There are relatively few real estate assets legally owned by the Group without any retrocession obligations. When possible, we do not seek to own offices.  Accordingly, we rent a building located at 36/38, avenue Kléber, 75116, Paris, France that we use as our corporate headquarters.  Ouroffice buildings.

Finally, assets purchased under finance leases fall into all three asset categories detailed above and our divisions’ senior management have maintained their offices in this building since May 2002, where certain central functions are performed.

Assets financed through direct financing leases, which can be entered under any of the three categories mentioned above, represented a net amount of €900€795 million as of December 31, 2007.  2009 (see Note 17 to the consolidated financial statements).

The total gross valuemain insurance policies subscribed by the Company are described in the Insurance section above.

Environmental issues may also influence the Company’s use of our property, plantsplant and equipment, as of December 31, 2007 was €28,711 million (a net value of €17,820 million as of December 31, 2007, representing 38% of total consolidated assets), compareddetailed in the heading Environmental Regulations, Policies and Compliance, above.



62



Back to €25,833 million as of December 31, 2006 (a net value of €15,724 million).Contents


RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (R&D)

Our activities are at the crossroads of the mainseveral major challenges offacing the modern world: demographic explosion and urbanization, access to water, the confrontation with climatefighting climatic change. The solutionssolution to these current challenges requirerequires a global industrial and technological approach. This globaltransversal approach lies at the core of our Research and DevelopmentInnovation (R&D)&I) strategy.


If technology did not advance, we would not be able to meet today’s challenges. It is therefore only by leaning fully on the capacity for innovation of our research teams that the Group plans to rise to the environmental challenge, by proposing innovative solutions at an affordable cost.

The focusfour-pronged approach of ourthe R&D currently includes resource management&I department composed of the following: (i) managing and preservation,preserving resources, (ii) limiting environmental impact,impacts on the environment, (iii) improving the quality of life of populations and (iv) developing sources of renewable energies.energies sources. Fighting against climate change is also occupies a top priority.  Our researchleading place in this framework. Research efforts relate principally toare concentrated on optimizing energy within our facilities, collectingconsumption at Group installations, developing alternative energy sources (bioenergies, biomass, waste-to-energy, alternative fuels), the desalination of sea water and storingthe improvement of treatment processes, the prevention of legionnaires’ disease, the recycling of urban waste, the capture and storage of carbon dioxide and developing bioenergy sources and clean transport methods.


the optimization of urban transportation.

In each of these areas, our expertiseknow-how and our technologies are complementary. This is the case, for example, in the areaareas of sludge, biomass, biofuels, prevention of Legionnaires’legionnaires’ disease orand the treatment of factoryindustrial effluents. Our

In addition, by mobilizing a network of international experts and the application of ourimplementing research programs at different geographical studytest sites allow us to seek answersaround the world, Veolia Environnement benefits from solutions to specific local problems inand contexts that may be adaptableapplied to other regions of the world.

The Reorganization of Research and Innovation Activities

To accompany its R&I ambitions, our Research and Innovation department decided to adopt a new operating approach in July 2009, based on a matrix structure founded on seven departments (life sciences, environment and health, analysis, modeling / process implementation and information technology, process engineering, energy and processes and design and engineering) and nine programs (bioresources, waste collection, sorting and beneficial re-use, drinking water, wastewater, energy production and efficiency, sustainable building and city management, transportation, new activities, and environmental and health standards). This new structure seeks to redeploy R&I efforts in order to break down barriers between research units and pool resources across transversal subjects. The scientific and technical teams of the four Divisions now report directly to a single management structure comprising seven departments representing the Group’s main disciplines. Therefore, water and waste biologists will now work together directly. By organizing its teams by area of expertise, the R&I Department will encourage new synergies and be better placed to develop outside partnerships.

In all their work,addition to giving our experts sufficient time to concentrate on scientific aspects, a programs department is now responsible for defining lines of research teamsand ensuring the budget monitoring and management of each project and the roll-out of innovations in the field.

At the same time, the research system was strengthened upstream with the creation of a Watch and Innovation department. This department is primarily charged with identifying new inventions in each business and promoting them within the Group. More generally, it is responsible for identifying innovations around the world, which are committedlikely to responding to environmental challenges while ensuringbe developed and integrated into our competitiveness.  For us. R&D is a priority area: the 45% increase since 2003 in resources allocated to these efforts is evidence of this commitment.


activities.



6063



Back to Contents


Research and DevelopmentInnovation Resources


Our research activities are overseen by Veolia Environnement Recherche et Innovation (VERI), which since January 2007 has fulfilled the missions of our Research, Development and Technology department, or “Research Department”. In 2007, this department consisted of2009, these R&I activities comprised nearly 800850 experts worldwide (including 400425 researchers and 400425 on-site developers), with a total budget of approximately €118€89.8 million.  For the year ended December 31, 2007, research expenses totaled €84.6 million, which, when added to operational development costs, amounts to an estimated budget of €118 million.  1

The Veolia Environnement Research Department works on behalf of all of our divisions, given thatGroup Divisions, as their needs are similar. In particular, all seek to solve environmental and health problems with the aidsupport of numerous tools, such as modeling and chemical and bacteriological analysis. By working on behalf of all divisions,Divisions, the Research Department helps to ensure that ourbetter consistency of R&D activities remain consistent  with ourthe Group’s strategy.

We have four main research centers that operate asin a network. Located in the Ile-de-FranceGreater Paris region surrounding Paris and specializing in water, waste, energy and transportation, the centers have related units orand correspondents in France and abroad (in the United(United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, theand United States and Australia)States).

In 2003, we establishedset up an international network of Research and Development correspondent networkInnovation officers, to identify innovation needs in each region of the world and analyze specificcommunicate local technical development and innovation needs.developments. Certain research centers abroad have acquired specialized expertise and are partnershave partnered with centers in France. These research units add to ourhave become showcases for Veolia Environnement’s technological expertise. For example, inIn the area of water,Water sector, the Berlin Water Center of Competence for Water (Kompetenzzentrum Wasser Berlin) is the reference pointa center of excellence for the protection of water resources while Australia has become the reference point for water reclamation information.  

The research teams include experts in the fields of health, environment and analysis who help anticipate the needs of and provide support to operators:

The Environment Department runs the research programs centered on the management and protection of water resources, environmental model building as well as on the evaluation of risks and environmental impacts (ACV);

The Health Department evaluates the risks and health benefits linked to our activities in collaboration with doctors and environmental health specialists.  It preventively identifies emerging health dangers and overseesAustralia have become a benchmark for the health and safetyreuse of our services.

The Environmental Analyses Center (EAC) conducts our analytical research activities and manages a network of laboratories. It carries out environmental and health monitoring control analyses for our entire Group. It develops measurement methods to rapidly and precisely identify pollutants or microorganisms in a very low concentration.wastewater.

Innovation: a rationalized methodapproach

OurThe research team aimsteams seek to provide innovative practical solutions within itstheir areas of expertise, which are crucial for our competitiveness. R&D&I is driven bycarried out as part of a rationalized method allowingapproach enabling technological risks to be mastered,controlled and allowingenabling rapid progress and the creation of successful commercial applications that are both reliable and effective. The main steps in the innovation process are:

Strict regulatory, technologicalmonitoring of regulations and, commercial monitoring thattechnology as well as the competition enables usthe Group to anticipateforesee future needs and proceed with the launch of new research programs as quickly as possible.  possible;

Laboratory or field tests are then carried out to verify the feasibility of the research. At this stage, analytical modeling2 may be carried out, depending on the circumstances (that is,(i.e., exploring functionality and cost containment potential).while containing costs);

If the tests are successful, a prototype is built in the laboratory or on site in order to evaluate and refine the technology.technology;

The next phase is the development of a pre-industrial unit to be installed onat an appropriate site and operated by personnel.

ForAt each step in the innovation process, the collaboration of various entitiesparties (research teams, university or private laboratories) is necessary and determines the successful outcome of the research project.

Veolia Environnement’s R&I teams are called uponpart of an international network of researchers. They forge links with fundamental research teams, each drawing benefit from the expertise of colleagues. While this collaboration enriches the knowledge of the Group R&I department and keeps it informed of recent developments, it also provides effective outlets for scientific progress and feedback to collaborate.  our partners. R&I teams also work with several top universities and participate in research programs led by national and international institutions. They also share their technological knowledge with industrial players.


1

Research and development expenditure totaled €89.8 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (see Note 19 to our consolidated financial statements) and represents, together with other operational development costs, a total budget estimated at €150 million.

2

At each step of the innovation process, researchers useimplement sophisticated tools, such as digital fluid mechanics. This technology enables researchers to simulate the operation of installations and test a larger number of scenarios to improve efficiency. Over a shorter period, such software enables researchers to optimize test protocols.protocols for process development.



6164



Back to Contents


Our researchers are part of an international network. They work closely with other research teams, each benefiting from the expertise of the others. While these collaborations enrich the knowledge of our R&D group and keep it up to date, they also provide productive opportunities for scientific advancement and capitalize on our partners’ experience. Researchers also work with several top universities and participate in research programs for national and international institutions.  They also share their technological knowledge with industrial companies.

Main Research & Development Areas


The four areas that are at the core of ourVeolia Environnement’s current R&D effortsResearch and Innovation are:

The managementManaging and preservation ofpreserving natural resources

The sector that will be most affected by climate change is Water. Research oninto sea water desalination processes, collection of rain water orand the re-use of wastewaterswastewater after treatment, is aimed at meeting the growing need for water.expected increase in water requirements. In order to preserve natural resources, it is also essential to find solutions to decrease consumption. The mechanization and automation of sorting processes for used materials, as well as the design of recycling processes for end of lifeend-of-life products or factoryindustrial effluents, encourage in this way the re-use and recovery of materials found in waste at a competitive cost.

Limitation ofLimiting environmental impacts

The improvement of treatment techniques for factoryindustrial effluents and hazardous waste makes it possible to limit the dispersion of pollutants in the environment and better respect biodiversity and humanpublic health. As a leader in environmental services,Environmental Services, we must set anthe example inwith regards to reducing the impact of ourits activities. EffortsCurrent efforts are therefore focused on reducing the waste generated byemissions from our facilities, reducingdecreasing noise and olfactory pollution and developing even cleaner means of transportation.

Improving quality of life worldwide

The perfecting of used water decontaminationwastewater depollution and of waste management systems tailored to developing countries improves the environmental safety of non-Western cities and helps prevent epidemics from spreading on a worldwide scale. It also preserves the quality of water and thus the health of those who consume it. Along with the development of clean means of transportation, the organization of mass transportation limitsreduces greenhouse gasesgas emissions and atmospheric pollution. It also improves living conditions in major cities and encourages economic development in developingemerging countries.

The development ofDeveloping alternative energy sources

As carbon dioxide emissions continue to exceed the absorption capacity of the biosphere, the production of substitute fuels and biofuels, the recyclingrecovery of biomass as energy, the development of industrial applications offor fuel cells and the optimization of the performance of our waste incineration unitsplants help limit emissions of greenhouse gases.gas emissions. These measures also help respond to the increasing global demand for energy and address the depletion of fossil fuel reserves and further the attempts to economize hydrogen.by replacing them with clean energies.

More thanOver 70% of our research programs have the goal of limitingthereby contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Relyingemissions, bearing witness to the Group’s strong commitment to fighting climate change. Current processes seek to eliminate greenhouse gas emissions or, where this is not possible, reduce emission levels. To this end, R&I activities focus primarily on an approach aimed at, first, not generating greenhouse gases, and, when that is impossible, reducing those emissions, we aim to control needs, improveimproving processes and energyenergetic efficiency and to make use ofexploiting more renewable energy sources. We also striveAt the same time, the Group is striving to put in placeimplement processes to capture, store and upgraderecover greenhouse gases and anticipateforesee future constraints resulting fromrelating to climate change.

Improvements for 20072009

A research platform dedicatedVeolia Environnement partnership with the Cleantech network

Veolia Environnement, highly reputed for its ability to high-performance systemsintegrate technology solutions beneficial to the environment, decided to join forces with the Cleantech Group for two years as a preferred partner.

Cleantech (abbreviation of “clean technology”) is a term used to describe technologies providing environmental added-value, primarily in terms of the treatment of drinking water

In September 2007, we opened a 1000 square meter test hall near the drinking water plant of Annet-sur-Marne near Paris, France.  Dedicated to studying high-performance systems for the treatment of drinking water, it brings together almost twenty pilot projects. Reducing organic matter, as well as the inconvenience of chlorination, especiallyecological footprint and eco-design, but also with respect to energy efficiency. Currently, numerous start-ups founded on the tastedevelopment of water,cleantech have emerged across the globe and undesirable byproducts and controlling emerging health risks are the main objectives.  Research relating to technological performance is combined with the energy and environmental results in order to select the most reliable processes. In particular, two kinds of treatment are studiedparticularly in the hall:

Hybrid processes (traditional system plus membranes) thatUnited States in Sillicon Valley. While these young companies sometimes harbor extremely innovative approaches and solutions, they are grouped withinnot always able to complete the Opaline system (trademark filed by our Group): they associate ultra filtration membranes (0.01 micron pores) with absorbents, resin or activated carbon. They are currently being tested on an industrial scale to treat waters with high organic matter content.



62



Back to Contents


Nanofiltration: in this system, the pores of the membranes are ten times closer together than in hybrid systems.  Implemented for over ten years, we are seeking to optimize this system in order to reduce related energy consumption, avoid clogginginnovation process and limit the impact of effluents.

A research program focused on the catchment, transport, use and storage of carbon dioxide

By 2050, we expect this solution to contributeroll-out their solutions, due to a 20%lack of resources and contacts.

Cleantech Group is a global network of over 2,000 start-ups and investors working on innovative environmental technologies. The network comes together several times a year in all continents to 30% reduction of greenhouse gases worldwide.  It has been the subject of a research program since 2007, althoughshare major advances in green technologies. In 2010, we have been studying it since 2005.  The goal of this program is to create a new means of reducing our greenhouse gas emissions, increase our expertise and explore new markets, along with the ability to offer a complete range of services relating to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions.  To this end, the program’s objectives are to find catchment solutions that are appropriate for the various types and sizes of facilities within our Group, to study the various transport and recycling systems adapted to the geographical position of our facilities, to establish an acceptable risk framework for this solution, and to set up pilot projects in order to enhance our expertise in catchment, transporting, recycling a nd storing of carbon dioxide.  The first on-site research pilots will be launched in 2008.  

Development and reinforcement of the bio-energy program

The use of biomass and waste (solid and liquid) as an energy source represents a solution not only for the conservation of fossil fuels but also for the promotion of renewable energies while minimizing environmental and health risks.  One of the objectives of our Research and Development department is to develop, evaluate, and provide support for the use of bio-energies, such as solid combustible waste, biogas from storage centers, mud from purification stations and biofuels.

This program was reorganized in 2007 through the creation of three major projects:  biofuels, biomass depositing and energy recycling.  Research teams were reinforced in order to implement these projects.  

A research program on atmospheric pollution modeling

A research program for atmospheric pollution modeling was launched one year ago. Its approach lies in developing software that is applicable to all of our activities, while its aim is to understand better the spreading mechanisms of atmospheric pollution, to track pollution and to gain a better understanding of emissions in order to control pollution concentration levelsparticipated in the environment. The innovative aspect of this approach is that,San Francisco Forum from February 24 to February 26 and will participate in the future,Paris Forum from April 26 to April 28. In this way, we will be ableintend to monitor in real time the pollutant concentrations in a given locationpromote our technology watch system and to make changes tofurther strengthen our activity based on such concentrations or measures, in particular during the design and location selection phases of facilities. This model is based on exiting flows, weather conditions, topography and land use.  In the long term, controlling pollution levels by adapting exit flows will be possible using local weath er forecasts.

A research program to limit the polluting emissions of composting platforms

Studies led by our research teams aim to optimize the design of composting platforms, to control and limit their health and environmental impact and to guarantee the traceability, the agronomic quality, and the harmlessness of compost.  Our R&D teams have developed an urban organic waste composting process (sludge, household waste and the like). The modeling of windrow airing systems coupled with an innovative patented composting technique makes it possible to ensure compost purification, in addition to reducing the energy consumption of current industrial facilities as well as odors and greenhouses gas emissions.  This is particularly the case for nitrous oxide which has a global warming potential that is 310 times stronger than that of carbon dioxide.

Advances in biofuels research

Veolia Transport’s goals include encouraging the use of biofuels by helping local communities make the right choices among new energies and renewing the fleet of motor vehicles to reduce their environmental impact and greenhouse gases. To this end, our researchers have tested, evaluated and approved a biodiesel fuel called Diester, made with 30% of canola seed ester, that does not alter the performance of motors.  Particle filter tests on motors fueled by biodiesel are currently being conducted. A more widespread use of biofuels in the Veolia Transport fleets is currently being considered.  In cooperation with Veolia Propreté, researchers are currently testing a system of esterification of used oils mixed with diesel fuel, a successful example of the reuse of collected waste.innovation process.



6365



Back to Contents


ADevelopment of tools to identify and capture odorant components in tap water

The “bad taste” of tap water is not an indication of sanitary risk but is a deterrent to consumption. An exceedingly minute quantity of odorant components is sufficient to produce a bad smell or an unusual taste.

As a Water specialist, Veolia Environnement decided to attack these problems head on. After defining the problems and the challenges, the research programteams successfully perfected three tools (based on Twister technology) to detect, extract and identify the components responsible for the taste and/or smell problems of drinking water:

ARISTOT (Advanced and Relevant Investigation Sampler for Taste & Odor at Tap): initially called “Twister Tap”, this tool captures organic components and particularly odorant components directly at the consumer’s tap;

PLATON (Programmable and Local Analysis of Taste & Odor in Networks): initially called “Twister Network” or “Integrator”, this tool traps organic components in network water;

ISOCRATE (In Situ Off-flavors Capture by Recurring and Automated Twister Extractions): this tool extracts molecules in a network or reservoir (surface water, plant, etc).

Hydrogen “doping” system for cogeneration engines

With primary energy savings of 40% and a decrease in greenhouse gas emissions of up to 30%, the energy efficiency performance of cogeneration is excellent. Cogeneration power plants are generally used to supply heating networks for public and private buildings, such as hospitals, schools or office or residential buildings.

Today, a country like Denmark produces over 50% of its electricity by cogeneration, compared to only 3% in France, at a time when the optimal performance of power plants would appear to have hit a ceiling. In order to improve the attraction and efficiency of cogeneration engines, Veolia Environnement R&I perfected and patented a procedure to “dope” the engines by injecting hydrogen. Thanks to the local production of hydrogen using catalytic effect, the research teams successfully increased gas-engine combustion efficiency, to produce more electrical and thermal energy from the same quantity of natural gas. This procedure could become widely available as it requires only limited investment and can be implemented without a fundamental change to existing installations.

Development of an ecodriving assistant to optimize the electricfuel consumption of street railwaysand CO2 emissions in Veolia fleet vehicles

Non-polluting, silent, environmentally friendlyVeolia Transport has always sought to minimize its impact on the environment. This has led to the use of proprietary measurement tools (such as the Eco-Efficient Travel1 indicator) and high-service, street railwaysproduced concrete and quantifiable results: 4.1 million metric tons of CO2 equivalents avoided in 2009.

In a effort to reduce fuel consumption and CO2 emissions of our fleet vehicles even further, our experts noted a 35% differential in fuel consumption between the two extremes in driving styles – very environmentally-friendly and extremely sporty. Based on this observation, and after three years of research, our experts produced an ecodriving assistant, which enables a further reduction in the fuel consumption and CO2 emissions of the Veolia fleet.

The ecodriving assistant uses pre-recorded algorithms to process a range of parameters, model changes in the vehicle and calculate in real-time the optimal speed and acceleration. The man-machine interface then reports a simple and intuitive instruction to the driver using a system of diodes. Green lights indicate that the driver is appropriately controlling his/her speed and acceleration. Conversely, when the driver drives too fast or accelerates or breaks too hard, the green lights disappear and are replaced by red lights, or even flashing red lights. Initial operating tests produced promising results, with fuel consumption savings of 4% and suggest a potential gain of 7% with individual training to drivers.


1

This indicator measures the performance of public transportation, per passenger, compared to private cars in terms of avoiding C02 emissions, reducing vehicle density and lowering accident risk.



66



Back to Contents


Developing a mobile-phone ticketing service for the Nice Côte d’Azur Agglomeration (CANCA)

The experts all agree that in order to reduce the use of private vehicles and thereby transport-related greenhouse gas emissions, it is essential to encourage the development of public transportation. However, public transportation is sometimes considered complicated to use and unreliable. To win over those who remain reticent, decrease traffic and reduce travel time, Veolia Environnement experts have been makingconsidering a comeback sincenew system based on mobile-phone technology.

Today, 80% of French people own a mobile phone. In the 1990’s. However,near future, these phones will have a NFC (Near Field Communication) interface, enabling “touch” communication. This NFC interface enables the exchange of data with a terminal located a few centimeters away. Using this NFC technology, Veolia Environnement developed a unified and user-friendly ticketing service, which turns the mobile phone into a passenger information service, a payment means and a transport ticket. This mobile-phone ticketing service is operational and ready to be launched in the greater Nice Côte d’Azur area.

Strengthening expertise in biodiversity with the launch of the “Mathematical Biodiversity Modeling” Chair

We are fully committed to programs to preserve biodiversity, particularly in regions where we operate, and therefore we wished to strengthen our expertise by joining forces with the prestigious French engineering school,Ecole Polytechnique, the French National Museum of Natural History and theÉcole PolytechniqueFoundation, to create the international “Mathematical Biodiversity Modeling” teaching and research chair.

The chair was created on street railway networks, electricity consumptionJune 17, 2009 by a public-private partnership in which the Museum andEcole Polytechniquewill supply outstanding teams of researchers and teachers, Veolia Environnement will contribute funding and technical expertise. TheEcole Polytechnique Foundation will provide its experience in industrial relations and assistance in project management. Working from an international perspective, the aim of the chair is to develop a synergy between applied mathematics, ecology, biodiversity and evolution in both research and teaching. Ultimately, the goal is to put in place and support an innovative, topical project with a strong scientific, social and economic impact. Taking a multidisciplinary approach to modeling ecosystems, such a project will address key environmental issues, such as adaptive evolution, spatial colonization and ecological niches, as we ll as analyze the dynamics of communities and build biodiversity scenarios.

For this approach, suitable new mathematical tools will have to be created. One of the main objectives is to develop new probability models of evolution along with the relevant statistical tools to better take into account the interactions and diversity of the scales of the different ecosystems, maing it possible to predict their dynamics. The impact of spatial or temporal variability in the environment on the growth and survival of a population will be studied, and random models for species abundance and displacement will be developed. Collaboration between the National Natural History Museum and Veolia Environnement will enable these models to be compared with field expertise and data, as well as with more operational situations.

Development of an automated sorting system

Sorting is a variable thatstrategic stage in waste management, particularly for recycling. Recycling reduces the quantity of final waste and any potential pollution. In addition to reducing the use of new raw materials, recycling generally enables energy and water savings in industrial processes and a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. Using increasingly complex technologies, R&I activities focus on automating sorting centers, whether for waste presorted by households or bulk non-hazardous industrial waste. By improving the quality of sorting activities, automation increases material recycling opportunities.

In 2007, Veolia Propreté developed and patented an innovative procedure, the Self-Adapting Sequential Sorting process (Tri Séquentiel Auto Adaptif, TSA). Thanks primarily to an algorithm which guides the sorting machine based on the waste flow composition, this process enables several categories of objects to be sorted by a single sorting machine. After the feasibility of this system had been demonstrated, industrial pilot studies were launched in April 2008. Following validation in 2009, the TSA 2 system can now be rolled-out and twenty installations are already planned by 2011. The TSA 2 system makes multi-task sorting machines feasible and particularly facilitates more efficient, detailed and extensive sorting of plastic materials. The process therefore enables the recovery of more used materials and increases the efficiency of sorting centers by close to 10%. Ov erall, TSA 2 therefore enables a reduction in recycling costs, which is fundamental to developing new competitive recovery outlets.

Employee and human aspects are also fully integrated into the research approach. The automation of sorting activities is a major research area for improving the work, health and safety conditions of sorting employees. Furthermore, the optimization of sorting activities will, in the long-term, open up new job opportunities in the recycling sector, with the appearance of new recovery markets.



67



Back to Contents


Waste-to-energy biomethane production

With strong demographic growth and the concentration of populations in urban areas, waste recycling is an environmental priority which Veolia Environnement Group has not yet been completely mastered. Withdecided to tackle. Currently, with the helpincrease in energy needs and the decrease in fossil fuels, Veolia Propreté is searching for solutions to replace fossils with new fuels produced from waste, thereby contributing to reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

In an energy production context, performance optimization and the diversification of biogas recovery methods at non-hazardous waste landfill sites, form part of the research conductedprograms we have undertaken. In 2009, Veolia Propreté Ile-de-France successfully brought the first French biomethane fuel production plant online, using biogas produced at the non-hazardous waste landfill site in Claye-Souilly (Seine et Marne). Eight light vehicles and a household refuse collection truck, fitted with NGV (Natural Gas Vehicle) engines, now fuel up on Méth’OD® (100% methane of waste origin) directly at Veolia Propreté’s Claye-Souilly site.

This new waste-to-energy process for biogas produced at non-hazardous waste landfill sites complements the existing waste-to-energy installations at the Claye-Souilly site, which produce electricity equivalent to the electricity consumption (excluding heating) of a town with a population of 228,000.

The development opportunities for this research program are substantial, given the quantity of methane produced by our installations operated around the world. This project enables the direct recovery of biogas, either as fuel for use by vehicles offloading their waste, or by Veolia Transport bus fleets, or as biomethane for reinjection into the natural gas transportation and distribution network.

Improving living conditions and the quality of indoor air

Improving the health and living conditions of populations is one of the major challenges underpinning Veolia Environnement R&I activities. According to the World Health Organization, 30% of diseases are due to air and water pollution.

With the concentration of populations and activities in urban areas, our research teams are focusing increasingly on the Rouen and St-Etienne networks, Veolia Transport’s Research and Innovation Center has prepared a complete energy assessmentproblems associated with the quality of the equipment tested.  For example, it has identified the amount of electricity used by heating systemsinside air. Numerous pollutants exist in the winter, as well asair inside residential accommodation, where the effectair is often more polluted than outside.

In 2009, R&I activities produced, in particular, more reliable tools to measure air quality. The Limay research center developed a special-purpose metering system (measurement model) which pushed forward advances achieved in 2008 by optimizing and validating the “Inside Air Quality” pilot study. Researchers thereby improved their ability to measure the efficiency of driving on a vehicle’s electricity consumption. An energy conservation policy will be established and the optimization of electric storage on board will be assessed.certain air treatment filters.



6468



Back to Contents


ITEM 4A: 4A.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not Applicable.




6569



Back to Contents


ITEM 5:5.

OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

The following discussion of our operations should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewherebelow in this report. Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board and with IFRS as adopted inby the European Union.

The following discussion also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those described under “Item 3. Key Information–Risk Factors.” Our results may differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements. See “Forward-Looking Statements” at the beginning of this document for a more detailed discussion of the risks and uncertainties to which our results and financial condition are subject.

OVERVIEW


Major Developments in 20072009

Overview

Our strategyAs was the case in the second half of developing environmental2008, 2009 was marked by the financial crisis and its economic repercussions, and specifically:

significant exchange rate fluctuations, which modified the contribution of businesses through long-term contracts enabled usfrom outside the Euro zone, particularly in Eastern Europe and in countries that use the U.S. dollar (or currencies tied to record a marked increasethe U.S. dollar);

the volatility in energy prices and the decrease in both the volume and market price of CO2 emission rights;

the fall, followed by the stagnation or rise, in the price of certain recycled raw materials (particularly paper and cardboard);

the slowdown in activity, affecting volumes in 2007, withthe Environmental Services business lines, and, to a 14% increaselesser extent, new construction orders in the Water and Energy Services Division;

the difficult financial situation of industrial companies and, to a lesser extent, public entities, which affected the performance of certain growth projects and the solvency of some customers.

The first signs of stabilization of the economic environment began to appear, nonetheless, during the second half of 2009.

This difficult economic climate affected our Environmental Services business units in particular and, to a lesser extent, the businesses of the other Divisions, in terms of the construction activities and sales of solutions to industrial customers.

Overall, revenue based on currentfor the year ended December 31, 2009 fell 3.4% compared to the year ended December 31, 2008 (-2.7% at constant scope of consolidation and exchange rates (14.9%rates). Adjusted operating cash flow (a non-GAAP measure that we use to assess performance, as discussed in more detail below) declined by 3.6% from 2008 to 2009, primarily in the Environmental Services Division (down 10.3%), despite the implementation of a cost-cutting plan. Adjusted operating income (another non-GAAP measure that we discuss below) declined by 15.1%, or 12.4% at constant exchange rates). This growth was accompanied by an improvementrates, again reflecting primarily a decline in adjusted operating income of 11.1% and in adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent of 22.5% (adjusted operating income and adjusted net income are non-GAAP measures that are defined under “Presentation of Information in this Section – Non-GAAP Measures”).Environmental Services Division. Operating income increased by 17.1% in 2007, and net income attributable to equity holders of the parent increased by 22.3%.

These performances are the result of our key development choices, focusing3.0%, or 6.1% at constant exchange rates, primarily on Europe, Asia and North America in all areas, and our ability to generate savings and synergies and to renew our contracts.

We developed our business in 2007 through new contracts and targeted acquisitions. These acquisitions enabled us to complete our business range in countries where only certain activitiesbecause substantial goodwill impairment charges (which do not affect adjusted operating cash flow or adjusted Operating Income) were represented. We significantly strengthened our position in Germany through the acquisition of Sulo (Environmental Services) and a number of smaller companies in the Energy Services sector. Similarly, we extended our presence in the United States, where we were already activerecorded in the Environmental Services, Water and Transportation sectors, through the acquisition of Thermal North America Inc, a company activeS ervices Division in Energy Services.  In China, we benefited from local privatizations in order to add new businesses in the Water, Environmental Services and Energy Services sectors.

The financial crisis triggered at the beginning of the summer by difficulties in the sub-prime lending market did not have a significant impact on us in 2007, particularly with respect to our liquidity and financing capacity.  The broader economic effects of the crisis, in particular in the United States, did not impact our activities in 2007. The strengthening of our  financial structure through a €2.6 billion share capital increase completed on July 10, 2007 and our standard long-term financing policy protected us against fluctuations in the credit market, despite a slight increase in net financing costs.2008.

New commercial success within growth markets

70



Back to Contents


Commercial Overview

We won several major contracts in 2007:2009:

InOn January 2007,21, 2009, Veolia Transport and RATP Développement formed a 50/50 joint venture to boost growth potential in Asia, primarily targeting China, South Korea and India. The joint venture was formed for an initial period of 20 years and will generate estimated annual revenue of approximately €100 million (full-year basis), with a business objective of €500 million of annual revenue in 2013.

On March 26, 2009, the consortium comprising Veolia Transport and its Moroccan partners won a 15-year contract to operate the collective transportation service for the Greater Rabat region, made up of 14 communes. This contract commenced in August 2009. The contract represents estimated total revenue of approximately €1,096 million.

On April 21, 2009, Veolia Eau won its 21st contractannounced that Canal Isabel II, the public company in China. Thischarge of water services in the Madrid area, awarded a contract for the management of Spain’s biggest wastewater treatment plant (in terms of daily flows treated) to a 30-year concessionconsortium headed by Veolia Eau. This 4-year contract, which has a 2-year extension clause, covers the operation and maintenance of the main treatment plant for Madrid. The contract represents estimated total revenue of approximately €16 million for Veolia Eau.

On May 19, 2009, Veolia Environmental Services announced the win by its subsidiary, Veolia Environmental Services (UK), of a 20-year waste management and recycling contract, following a public tender launched by the Merseyside Waste Disposal Authority (MWDA). MWDA is a public body representing five Merseyside district councils located in the north-west of England and including the city of Liverpool. The contract, which commenced in June 2009, includes the development of a flagship materials recovery facility (MRF) at Gilmoss, Liverpool, with an annual capacity of 100,000 metric tons and a refurbishment program for existing infrastructure including improvements to the efficiency and yield of the Bidston MRF and the renovation and management of a network of 16 household waste recycling centers. The contract represents estimated total revenue of approximately £640 million (€72 0 million).

��

On May 28, 2009, Veolia Eau announced the signature with the Lanzhou Water Supply Company inpublic works authority of the city of Doha, the capital of Gansu province,Qatar, of a 7-year contract (with a 3-year extension clause) for the operation and maintenance of two wastewater treatment plants with respective daily waste capacity of 112,000 m3 and 12,000 m3respectively. Once recycled, the wastewater will be reused for irrigation and agricultural purposes. This contract represents estimated total cumulative revenue estimated at €1.6 billion.of approximately €44 million.

In January 2007,On June 23, 2009, Veolia Eau wonannounced the award by the Joint District Authority of the city of Chartres in France of a contract to build finance and operate the city’s new wastewater treatment plant. When the plant comes into service (34 months after the launch of studies), it will have a reverse osmosis seawater desalination plant intreatment capacity of 164,000 population equivalent, which may be extended to a 200,000 population equivalent by the Sultanateend of Oman. This 22-year contract represents total cumulative revenue estimated at €434 million, including revenue from the contract. The design and construction of the new plant.plant will be contracted-out by Veolia Eau to a consortium made up of OTV/Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies (a subsidiary of Veolia Eau and the lead company) and Ternois. This contract represents estimated total revenue of €156 million, including €54 million for construction activities and €102 million for the 20-year concession contract.

AtIn July 2009, Veolia Transport was informed of the enddecision not to renew the Melbourne contract (train network). This contract represented annual revenue of January 2007, Veolia Propreté won a contract to operate a waste-to-energy facility in Pinellas, Florida. This 17-year contract represents total cumulative revenue estimated at €356approximately €410 million.

On March 15, 2007, as partJuly 7, 2009, the Group announced the signature by Veolia Transport of a consortium,10-year contract (initial term of 5 years, with renewal for a further 5 years based upon performance goals) with the New Orleans Regional Transit Authority (RTA). Veolia Transportation, the U.S. subsidiary of Veolia Transport, will be responsible for all aspects of public transportation in New Orleans under a delegated management contract, including operations, safety, maintenance, customer care, routes and schedules, capital planning and grant administration. The contract represents estimated total revenue of approximately €202 million for Veolia.

On September 15, 2009, Veolia Eau wonannounced that the Brazilian oil company Petrobras had awarded its subsidiary Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies, under a 50/50 joint venture with Enfil, a Brazilian water treatment engineering company, a contract to design, build, operate and maintain a reverse osmosis seawater desalination plant in Campo de Dalias, in southern Spain, representing total cumulative revenue estimated at approximately €128 million for the consortiumdesign and construction of a water treatment and recycling plant at the Abreu e Lima Refinery, in Ipojuca, Pernambuco State, Brazil. This contract represents estimated total consolidated revenue estimated at €78 millionrevenues for Veolia Eau.Eau of €123 million.



6671



Back to Contents


In April 2007,On September 24, 2009, Veolia Transport as partannounced it had won the bus operating contract for the Västra Götaland Region, west of a consortium,Göteborg, Sweden. This 8-year contract will commence in June 2010 and represents annual revenues estimated at approximately €30 million.

On October 7, 2009, Veolia Transport announced it had won a 30-yearthe public service delegation and transport contract for Mont Saint Michel in France. The joint authority with responsibility for the Bay of Mont Saint Michel selected Veolia Transport to operate Leslys,public services to welcome and transport visitors to the future tramway line betweensite. The contract is for 13 years, three of which will be spent on the cityconstruction of Lyonthe off-site parking lots and its airport Saint Exupéry; this contract represents totalthe operations center. It will generate estimated cumulative revenue estimated at €360of approximately €91 million.

In April 2007, Veolia Eau signed a new contract to design, build and operate one of the largest water treatment plants in the United States. This contract to expand the capacity of a regional surface water treatment plant in Tampa Bay, Florida, represents total cumulative revenue estimated at €108 million.

In April 2007, Dalkia won its first contract to operate and develop a heating network in China, to serve the town of Jiamusi, in Heilongjiang province. This 25-year contract represents total cumulative revenue estimated at €1 billion.

On May 7, 2007, Veolia Eau won a new contract in Japan to operate and maintain the wastewater treatment plant of Chiba, near Tokyo. This 3-year contract represents total cumulative revenue estimated at €17.8 million.

In May 2007, Dalkia took over the contract to build and operate the southwest district heating network in Harbin, the capital of Heilongjiang province located in the northeast of China. This initial transaction represents an investment of €70 million, and anticipated revenue for the first year of operation is €19 million.

On June 5, 2007, theConseil d’Etat (the highest French administrative court) issued a ruling in favor of SNCM. The public service delegation contract was awarded on June 7, 2007, effective July 1, 2007, for a term of six and a half years and represents total cumulative revenue estimated at €1.2 billion.

On June 14, 2007, Veolia Eau won its 22nd contract in China. This 30-year contract for the comprehensive management of the drinking water public service and the operation of a wastewater treatment plant in the leading economic city of Haikou, the capital of Hainan Island in southern China, represents total cumulative revenue estimated at €776 million.

On June 28, 2007, Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies, through its subsidiary SIDEM, was selected to design and build in Saudi Arabia one of the largest desalination plants in the world. Considered of national importance, the plant will provide 800,000m3/day of desalinated water to the industrial city of Jubail and a province of Saudi Arabia (Marafiq) - a desert region facing massive industrialization plans and a growing population. This contract represents total cumulative revenue estimated at USD945 million (€647 million).

In June 2007, Veolia Transport won a 10-year contract to operate the ninth line of the Seoul subway. Total cumulative revenue from this contract is estimated at €400 million.

On July 18, 2007, Veolia Eau won a major contract to design, build, operate and maintain a reverse osmosis desalination plant in Sydney, Australia. This contract, which seeks to provide a secure and reliable supply of drinking water to the city of Sydney, represents total cumulative revenue estimated at €540 million.

On August 29, 2007, Veolia Eau won a USD805 million (€547 million) contract to build a desalination plant in the United Arab Emirates. The plant will be built by SIDEM (a subsidiary of Veolia Eau) and will be located in Qidfa, in the Emirate of Fujairah.

On August 30, 2007, Veolia Propreté was selected by Shropshire Waste Partnership (UK) to provide integrated waste management services. This 27-year contract represents total cumulative revenue estimated at €1,030 million.

On September 27, 2007, Veolia Eau was selected to supply drinking water to 3 million inhabitants of Tianjin, a city enjoying one of the highest economic growth rates in China. The 30-year contract represents total cumulative revenue estimated at €2.5 billion.

On October 1, 2007,2009, Dalkia announced the signature of a contract with the Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital in Udine, Italy for the comprehensive management of the largest hospital complex in Brazil.a heating network, integrated facilities management and thermal and multi-technical services. This 15-year30-year contract represents estimated total revenue of €186€394 million.

On November 9, 2009, the Group announced the signature of a partnership between Dalkia and CEZ, the number-one electricity producer in the Czech Republic, to develop industrial cooperation that could potentially lead to asset transfers. As a first step, the Group will transfer 15% of Dalkia Czech Republic to CEZ for consideration of €93 million (Group share), subject to obtaining the necessary competition authorizations. This transaction has not yet been completed as of the date of this document.

On November 30, 2009, the Group announced that Veolia Environmental Services, via its subsidiary Ecospace Limited, had renewed the operating and maintenance contract for the hazardous waste treatment plant in Hong Kong for a period of 10 years commencing December 1, 2009. This contract strengthened Veolia Environmental Services’ position as a major player in the waste management and recovery market serving the Hong Kong community. It is expected to generate cumulative revenue of €174 million.

In August 2007,December 2009, Dalkia announced the signature of a contract with Tersa Tractament y Seleccio de Residus SA in Spain for the management of a heating and cooling network in the Marina district of Barcelona. This 30-year contract represents estimated total revenue of €492 million.

The public service delegation contract between SEDIF (Great Paris Water Authority) and Veolia Eau in France expires at the end of 2010. A call for tenders is in progress for the renewal of this contract, which currently represents annual revenue of approximately €360 million. SEDIF announced on January 22, 2010 that it had short-listed Veolia and Suez Environnement as candidates for the renewal of this contract. A final decision is expected from SEDIF in June 2010 and the future contract will take effect on January 1, 2011.

Acquisitions Disposals and Partnerships

No major acquisitions were completed during 2009.

As part of its divestiture program, the Group made the following divestitures in 2009:

On June 24, 2009, Veolia Environmental Services announced that it had entered into exclusive discussions with TFN Group with respect to the sale of Veolia Propreté signed a contract to build and operate a waste storage facility in South-East China. This 30-year concession represents total cumulative revenue estimated at €92Nettoyage et Multiservices (VPNM). The sale was completed on August, 26, 2009 for an enterprise value of €111 million.

In November 2007,On July 6, 2009, Veolia Environmental Services announced the signature of an agreement relating to the sale of its U.S. incineration business (Montenay International); the partial sale of activities provided for in the agreement was completed in August 2009 for an enterprise value of €220 million.

On August 12, 2009, Dalkia announced the signature of an agreement for the sale of its Facilities Management activities in the United Kingdom for a total amount of €90 million (Group share) as of December 31, 2009.

On December 1, 2009, Veolia Environnement announced that its subsidiary Veolia Transport wonhad completed the ferry service contractsale of Veolia Cargo to Transport Ferroviaire Holding (SNCF Group) and Europorte (Eurotunnel Group). Europorte purchased Veolia Cargo’s activities in France, while Transport Ferroviaire Holding purchased Veolia Cargo’s activities in Germany, the Netherlands and Italy. The divestiture of Veolia Cargo was completed in December 2009 for the Morbihan Islands (Groix, Belle-Ile-en-Mer, Houat and Houëdic) in France. This 7-year contract started on January 1, 2008 and represents total cumulative revenue estimated at €154an enterprise value of €94 million.



6772



Back to Contents


On December 6, 2007,22, 2009, Veolia Eau wonreviewed certain economic aspects (financial restructuring) and the governance rules of its partnership with Mubadala Development Company in our operating activities in North Africa and the Middle East. The joint venture, which was formerly fully consolidated, is now under proportionate consolidation due to these changes. This operation resulted in a 10-year contract€189 million reduction in the United States to manage the wastewater system serving a populationGroup debt as of 1.1 million in the greater Milwaukee area. This contract represents total cumulative revenue estimated at €272 million.

On December 21, 2007, Veolia Eau won a second contract for the operation and maintenance of the Fujairah IWPP desalination plant in the United Arab Emirates. This operating and maintenance contract is for a 12-year period, beginning in the summer of 2010 and represents total cumulative revenue estimated at €71 million.

We also strengthened our position as a market leader through targeted acquisitions generating growth and cost synergies:

In North America (Canada), Veolia Propreté purchased Ecolocycle for €19.2 million;31, 2009;

In the Asia-Pacific region, Veolia Propreté purchased Cleanaway Asiafourth quarter of 2009, the Group finalized the sale of a minority interest in Compagnie Méridionale de Navigation for €23.2 million;€45 million, representing the entire remaining interest held by the Group.

InFinally, in December 2009, the EBRD acquired an additional 6.88% interest in Veolia Voda (through a reserved share capital increase), the entity that conducts all of the Group’s Water Division operating activities in Central European area,Europe, for €70 million. This brings the total interest of the EBRD in Veolia Energie purchased Pannon Power in Hungary for €75.2 million, Kolin in the Czech Republic for €27.7 millionVoda to 16.88%.

Overall, industrial and Sinesco in Hungary for €26.4 million.

On April 27, 2007, Veolia Environnement announced the signature of an agreement to acquire Sulo, the German number two in waste management and market leader in the collection of municipal waste and packaging, forfinancial divestitures (on an enterprise value of €1,450basis), including share capital increases subscribed by non-controlling interests, totaled €1,291 million (including financial debt). An agreement was signed on July 29, 2007in fiscal year 2009.

The Group has decided to sell the ET Division (manufacture of plastic containers) of Sulo, considered non-core, for an amount of €172 million (including financial debt). The acquisition was finalized on July 2, 2007 and had an impact of €627.6 million on revenue for the year ended December 31, 2007;

On May 31, 2007, Veolia Propreté announced the signature of an agreement for the acquisition of a controlling interestits activities in TMT, an Italian subsidiary of Termomeccanica Ecologica specialized in waste management and treatment. The transaction concerns 75% of the shares based on an enterprise value (100%) of €338 million. This acquisition was finalized on October 3, 2007;

On June 12, 2007, Veolia Energie signed an agreement to acquire Thermal North America, Inc., a privately owned company with the largest portfolio of district heating and cooling networks in the United States, for an enterprise value of USD788 million. The acquisition was finalized on December 12, 2007;

On August 9, 2007, Veolia Eau signed an agreement to purchase the non-regulated activities of Thames Water in the United Kingdom for an enterprise value of €233 million. This acquisition, which was finalized on November 28, 2007, will enable Veolia Eau to participate in the construction and management of major Private Finance Initiatives (PFI)transportation in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland;

On August 24, 2007, Veolia Propreté signed an agreement to acquire the solid waste treatmentits Renewable Energies business of Allied Waste Industries in the United States, for an enterprise value of €71 million;  

On December 24, 2007, Veolia Eau purchased the assets of the ProcessEnergy Services Division during the course of Tetra Technologies. This acquisition seeks2010. These activities correspond to expand Veolia’s petroleum refinery waste treatment activitiescash-generating units and have been therefore reclassified in discontinued operations in the United States.


We also pursued our development strategy in 2007 in new businesses that are directly linked to our areasGroup financial statements as of expertise:December 31, 2009.

On July 1, 2007,23, 2009 and as announced in August 2009, the Group and the Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations decided to enter into exclusive negotiations with a view to combining Transdev, a leading French transport operator, and Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies purchased Anox Kaldnes,Transport. The operation would take the form of a companycombination between Veolia Transport and Transdev, with expertise in biological wastewater treatment.

On October 29, 2007,the Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations and Veolia Environnement purchasedeach owning 50% after analysis and valuation of the share capital of Eolfi, a company specialized in wind-turbine energy, through an €18 million reserved share capital increase.

On November 20, 2007, Veolia Propreté signed an agreement to purchase the Bartin Group (Bartin Recycling Group), onetwo companies, and subsequent adjustment of the leading French operatorsfinancial structure. The planned combination is subject to reaching a definitive agreement, which is itself subject to approval by the regulatory authorities. This industrial project is anticipated to give rise to a global leader in waste recoverypublic passenger transport, with around €8 billion in combined revenues and recycling,130,000 employees.

In December 2009, Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations and Veolia Environnement reached a framework agreement for the combination, which reported revenueprimarily covers the financial structure of €249 millionthe new group, with a view to the signature of a final agreement in 2006. This acquisition, combined with recycling2010. The proposed combination of Veolia Transport and Transdev would be carried out by way of the contribution of Veolia Transport and Transdev to a new entity, held 50% by Veolia Environnement, acting as the industrial operator so as to retain transportation as a key component of its environmental services, and 50% by Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations, acting as a long-term strategic shareholder. In order to contribute to the buy out of the RATP 25.6% shareholding in Transdev, the Group would divest certain Transport activities already purchased in Germany, considerably strengthens Veolia Propreté’s position in the Western Europe recycling market. This acquisition was finalized on February 13, 2008.



68



Back to Contents


We continued our portfolio review during 2007 and madeoutside of France, as well as a limited number of partial and total divestitures, which did not materially impact our operating capacity:

Transport Division contracts in France as part of the sale of certain assets owned by recently acquired companies and not includedcombination with Transdev, in the development plan, such as the Fawley incinerator in the United Kingdom for €36 million and the Sulo ET division (manufacture of plastic containers) for €172 million;

the continuation of our partnership in Central Europeline with the EBRD which acquired a 10 % stakeproject announced in the water division company, Veolia Voda (Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland, etc.), through a €90 million reserved share capital increase;

the acquisition by the International Finance Company (IFC) and Société de Promotion et de Participation pour la Coopération Economique (PROPARCO) of a 19.45% stake in Veolia Water AMI, the holding company for water division activities in Africa, the Middle East and the Indian sub-continent.

the disposal by the transportation division of its activities in Denmark on August 31, 2007 and its activities in Spain (with the exception of certain contracts including the Barcelona tramway) on November 9, 2007.2009.

Finally, we brought partners in as equity investors in certain consolidated subsidiaries, in order to optimize commercial development opportunities or reduce risk, particularly in China and Morocco.

Presentation of Information in this Section

Definition of “organic”“internal growth” and “external” growth“external growth”

As used in this report, theThe term “organicinternal growth” includes (or “growth at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates”) encompasses growth resulting from the expansion of an existing contract, particularlynotably resulting from an increase in prices and/or volumes delivereddistributed or processed, as well as new contracts, and the acquisition of operating assets attributed to a particular contract or project.

The term “external growth” includesexternal growth” encompasses growth through acquisitions (completed in the current period, or which had an effect on revenues for only part of the prior period), net of divestitures, of entities that hold multiple contracts and/or assets useddeployed in different markets and/or containing a portfolio of more than one or more markets.contract.



73



Back to Contents


Non-GAAP Measures

We use a number of non-GAAP financial measures to manage our business and to supplement ourthe financial information presented in accordance with IFRS. Non-GAAP financial measures are defined as numerical measures of performance, position or cash flows that (i) exclude amounts that arewould ordinarily be included in the nearestmost directly comparable IFRS measures,measure or (ii) include amounts that are not inwould ordinarily be excluded from the nearestmost directly comparable IFRS measures.measure. We discuss below the non-GAAP financial measures that we use in multiple places in this Section, the reasons why we believe they provide useful information and the location in this Section where they are reconciled to the nearestmost comparable IFRS measures. We provide similar information for non-GAAP measures that we use only once in the Sections where those terms are used. You should not place undue reliance on non-GAAP financial measuresmeasu res or regard them as a substitute for the nearestmost comparable IFRS measures. Further,Furthermore, these non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.companies, and are not meant to be predictive of future trends in results of operations, financial condition or cash flow.

The non-GAAP financial measures that we use in this section areinclude the following:

Adjusted operating cash flow” (known in French ascapacité d’autofinancement opérationnelle) is an indicator that we use as a performance measure, which reflects the extent to which our operations produce cash. We believe this indicator is important for measuring our operating performance, because it eliminates non-cash charges such as depreciation, amortization and asset impairment, which can vary between similar operations based on the type of contractual relationship that we have with our customers. Adjusted operating cash flow is equal to operating income, adjusted to add or subtract (as applicable) depreciation, amortization and operational provisions expenses, impairment charges, replacement costs for concession assets (which are treated as investments in our consolidated cash flow statement), net gains on divestitures and other non-cash items (primarily IFRS 2 share-based compensation charges and fair value adjustments in respect of derivatives).

We use adjusted operating cash flow as a tool to manage our business, for purposes of evaluating our performance and for allocating resources internally, and as one of the elements that we use to determine variable compensation of our senior executives. Adjusted operating cash flow is reconciled to operating income for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008, and 2009 under “—Results of Operations – Year ended December 31, 2009 compared to Year ended December 31, 2008” and “—Results of Operations – Year ended December 31, 2008 compared to Year ended December 31, 2007.”

Adjusted operating income” and “adjustedAdjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent” are equal to operating income and net income attributable to equity holders of the parent, respectively, adjusted to exclude the impact of goodwill impairment charges and certain items that are “non-recurring.” An item is “non-recurring” if it is unlikely to recur during each period and if it substantially changes the economics of one or more cash-generating units. We do not classify an item as “non-recurring” if the nature of the relevant charge or gain is such that it is reasonably likely to recur within two years, or there was a similar charge or gain within the prior two years. We believe that adjusted operating income and adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent are useful measurement tools because th eybec ause they show the results of our operations without regard to:excluding the impact of:

goodwill impairment charges, which we record when we determinesdetermine that the value of a cash generating unit is less than its carrying value (as discussed under “—Critical Accounting Policies – Asset Impairment”), and which are differentdiffer from ourthe other items of revenuesrevenue and expensesexpense items used to determine operating income as they depend on management’s assessment of the future potential of a cash generating unit, rather than its results of operations in the period in question, and

non-recurring items, which by their nature are unlikely to be indicative of future trends in our results of operations.



69



Back to Contents


In addition, weWe use adjusted operating income as a tool to manage our business, for purposes of evaluating our performance and for allocating resources internallyinternally. Adjusted operating income and as one factor in determining the variable compensation of our senior executives.  See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees – Compensation.” “Adjusted operating income” and “AdjustedAdjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent”parent are reconciled to operating income and net income attributable to equity holders of the parent, in each case for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006,2007, 2008, and 20072009 under “—Results of Operations – Year ended December 31, 20072009 compared to Year ended December 31, 2006”2008” and “—Results of Operations – Year ended December 31, 20062008 compared to Year ended December 31, 2005.”  

Net financial debt” represents gross financial debt (long-term borrowings, short-term borrowings, bank overdrafts and other cash position items), net of cash and cash equivalents and excluding fair value adjustments to derivatives hedging debt.  We use net financial debt as an indicator to monitor our overall liquidity position, and as one factor in determining the variable compensation of our senior executives.  Our net financial debt is reconciled to our gross financial debt in “—Liquidity and Capital Resources – Source of Funds – Financings.2007.

ROCE” or “Return on Capital EmployedConstant Exchange Rates” is a measurement toolterm that we use to managerefer to growth in our revenues, adjusted operating cash flow and operating income, excluding the profitabilityimpact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. We calculate constant exchange rate figures by applying to current year figures the exchange rate from the preceding year. When we present percentage growth (or decline) on a constant exchange rate basis, we also present the corresponding figure on a current exchange rate basis.



74



Back to Contents


Accounting for concessions and other items

General

Concession agreements are accounted for in accordance with IFRIC 12, Service Concession Arrangements, published in November 2006. This interpretation, which was approved by the European Union on March 26, 2009, is applicable to periods beginning on or after January 1, 2008. In fiscal year 2006, Veolia Environnement elected to adopt IFRIC 12 early, and this change in accounting method was applied retrospectively in accordance with IAS 8 on changes in accounting method.

The application of IFRIC 12 is complex and is described in detail in Note 1.21 to our consolidated financial statements. As a general matter, a contract is considered a concession agreement under IFRIC 12 if a public sector customer (the “grantor”) controls or regulates the services that we must provide with the infrastructure that we use, to whom the services must be provided and at what price, and if the grantor controls a significant residual interest in the infrastructure. Pursuant to IFRIC 12, the infrastructure used in a concession is not considered to be part of our property, plant and equipment, but instead we recognize financial assets or intangible assets (depending on the nature of our payment rights) in respect of the concession contracts.

Change in Presentation of Replacement Costs as of January 1, 2010

Beginning on January 1, 2010, the Group’s presentation of replacement costs relating to concession assets in the context of public service delegation contracts globallyin France will be changed, pursuant to an amendment to IAS 7.

Currently, all such replacement costs are considered in the consolidated cash flow statement as investments, regardless of whether the infrastructure was originally financed by the concession holder. As such, in the passage from “net income attributable to equity holders of the parent” to “net cash from operating activities,” replacement costs are eliminated under “Operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses.” See Note 19 to make investment decisions.  ROCE is the ratioConsolidated Financial Statements included in this document.

As a result of (i) our resultsthe change that will take effect on January 1, 2010, the Group will eliminate replacement costs from net cash from operating activities in the consolidated cash flow statement and reduce the amount of operations, netmaintenance-related investments presented in the consolidated cash flow statement. Consequently, when adjusting “Net income attributable to equity holders of tax,the parent” to obtain “Net cash from operating activities,” replacement costs will no longer be eliminated under “Operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and our share ofimpairment losses.” This amendment has no impact on net income of associates excluding revenue from operational financial assets, divided by (ii) the average amount of capital employed in our business during the same year.  Each of these terms is defined, and is reconciled to the nearest IFRS measure, under “—Liquidity and Capital Resources – Capital Expenditures – Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)”.or equity.

Critical accounting policies

We prepare our consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRS as issued by the IASB and with IFRS as adopted by the European Union. Our consolidated financial statements are affected by the accounting policies used and the estimates, judgments and assumptions made by management during their preparation. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the periods presented.

The principal significant estimates and assumptions made by management during the preparation of our consolidated financial statements relate to the accounting policies used in connection with asset impairment, provisions, pension liabilities, asset impairment, deferred taxes and derivative financial instruments.

Asset Impairment

The net carrying amount of non-financial assets, other than inventory and deferred tax assets is reviewed at each period-end in order to assess the existence of any indication of loss in value. Where such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset (equal to the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use) is estimated and the net carrying amount of an asset or group of assets is reduced to its recoverable amount where this is lower. Impairment losses can be reversed, with the exception of those relating to goodwill.

Veolia Environnement performs systematic annual impairment tests on goodwill and other intangible assets with an indefinite useful life during our annual long-term planning review, or more frequently where there is an indication of loss in value. Where an exceptional impairment must be recorded, it is deducted in priority from goodwill allocated to the cash-generating unit (CGU) and then, where applicable, pro rata to the net carrying amounts of the other assets of the CGU.



75



Back to Contents


The value-in-use is determined by discounting the future cash flows expected to be derived from the asset, CGU or group of CGUs considered, taking into account, where appropriate, the residual value. Given the Group’s activities, the CGUs generally represent a country in each Division. Future cash flows are taken for the first six years from the long-term plan validated by Executive Management. The main assumptions included in the calculation of the value-in-use of each CGU are the discount rate, changes in activity volumes, prices and direct costs (inflation rate) and investments over the period:

A discount rate (weighted average cost of capital) is determined for each asset, CGU or group of CGUs: it is equal to the risk-free rate plus a risk premium weighted for country-specific risks. The discount rates estimated by management for each cash-generating unit therefore reflect current market assessments of the time value of money and the country specific risks to which the cash-generating unit is exposed, with the other risks reflected in the expected future cash flows from the assets.

Changes in volumes, prices and direct costs are based on past changes and expected future market trends.

The terminal value is calculated based on discounted forecast flows for the last year (2015). These flows include organic growth from factors such as inflation.

As Water activities in China follow a specific economic model, with extremely long contract terms (up to fifty years) and high investment flows during the initial contract years, fiscal year 2015 may not be considered a standard year. Therefore, exceptionally, the business plan was extended to 2024 for the “Water–China” CGU, in order to identify standard flows for the calculation of the terminal value. The growth rate to perpetuity set out in Note 4 of our consolidated financial statements applies from this year.

A 1% increase in the discount rate used would generate recoverable net present values for invested capital below the net carrying amounts for those assets in the balance sheets of certain CGUs. The resulting impairment charge would be approximately €291 million (including €129 million for the “Energy Services - United States” CGU, €62 million for the “Dalkia - Italy” CGU and €31 million for the “Environmental Services – Italy” CGU).

A 1% decrease in the perpetual growth rate used would generate recoverable net present values for invested capital below the net carrying amounts for those assets in the balance sheets of certain CGUs. The resulting impairment charge would be approximately €237 million (including €106 million for the “Energy Services - United States” CGU, €43 million for the “Dalkia - Italy” CGU and €24 million for the “Environmental Services – Italy” CGU).

Provisions

Pursuant to IAS 37,Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets, a provision is recorded when, at the year end, the Group has a current legal or implicit obligation to a third party as a result of a past event, and it is more probable than not that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and the amount of the obligation can be reliably estimated.

As part of its obligations under public services contracts, the Group generally assumes responsibility for the maintenance and repair of installations of the publicly-owned utility networks it manages. The resulting maintenance and repair costs are analyzed in accordance with IAS 37 on provisions and, where necessary, a provision for contractual commitments is recorded where there is outstanding work to be performed.

In the event of a restructuring, an obligation exists if, prior to the period end, the restructuring has been announced and a detailed plan produced or implementation has commenced. Future operating costs are not provided.

Veolia Environnement calculates provisions for restoration of waste storage facilities, recording accruals corresponding to the obligation to restore a site as waste is deposited, i.e. recording a non-current asset component and then discounting to obtain a present value. This asset is then amortized based on its depletion.

Provisions giving rise to an outflow after more than one year are discounted if the impact is material. Discount rates reflect current assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the liability. The unwinding of the discount is recorded in the Consolidated Income Statement in “Other financial income and expenses.”



76



Back to Contents


Pension Liabilities

We maintain several pension plans, and measure our obligations under these plans using a projected unit credit method, which requires us to estimate the probability of personnel remaining with us until retirement, foreseeable changes in future compensation and the present value of itsour liability on the basis of the appropriate discount rate for each monetary zone in which we maintain a pension plan. As a result, we record pension-related assets or liabilities in our accounts and we record the related net expenses over the estimated term of service of our employees.

In accordance with IFRS requirements, we use market yields of high quality corporate bonds with a maturity similar in duration to the pension liabilities to determine the discount rate at the balance sheet date when available. If no such market yields are available, then we use the yields on government bonds with a maturity similar in duration to the liabilities. We estimate future compensation based on inflation rates estimated using a combination of the spread between index linked and non-index linked bonds, current inflation rates, and published statements of central banks and economists with respect to inflation prospects. We use mortality tables published by national statistical agencies in our evaluations, reviewed periodically to ensure that the latest available tables are being used. The assumptions used to measure pension liabilities as of December 31, 20072009 are described in Note 3230 to the consolidated financial statements.

The Group benefit obligation is especially sensitive to the discount rate and inflation. As of December 31, 2007,2009, a 1% increase in the discount rate would have decreased our aggregate pensiondecrease the benefit obligation by €248€237 million and our current service costs by €14€10 million. A 1% decrease in the discount rate would have increasedincrease the benefit obligation by €293€284 million and the current service costs by €14€13 million.

As of December 31, 2007,Conversely, a 1% increase in the inflation rate would have increased our aggregate pensionincrease the benefit obligation by €226€231 million and our current service costs by €6€9 million. A 1% decrease in the inflation rate would have decreaseddecrease the benefit obligation by €193€201 million and the current service costs by €6€7 million.



70



Back to Contents


Asset Impairment

We perform an annual review of our goodwill and other intangible assets during our long-term planning in mid-year, or more frequently when there is an indication of an impairment loss. If the long-term prospects of an activity appear durably downgraded, we estimate the value of the impairment based either on the fair value less selling costs of the assets related to this activity in cases where we decide to dispose of the activity, or on the higher of fair value less selling costs or value in use, in cases where we decide to retain the activity.  We then record a one-time write-off or write-down of the carrying value of our goodwill to bring it in line with our estimates.    

When we use fair value less selling costs, we estimate the fair value based on earnings multiples appearing in brokers’ reports or on published information regarding similar transactions.  Our estimate could be significantly different from the actual sales price that we could receive in connection with the disposal of the activity.  In addition, actual selling costs could be greater or less than the estimate.

When we use the discounted future cash flows method to estimate value in use, we estimate future cash flows of business units known as “cash generating units,” and we apply a discount rate to the estimated future cash flows.   A cash-generating unit is generally a business segment (i.e., water, waste, energy or transport) in a given country.  Our future cash flow estimates are based on the forecasts in our latest long-term plan, plus an appropriate growth rate applied after the period covered by the plan.   The discount rate is equal to the risk free rate plus a risk premium weighted for business-specific risks relating to each asset, cash-generating unit or group of cash-generating units.  

As of December 31, 2007, a 1% increase in the discountexpected rate applied to each cash generating unitof return assumption would have resulted in an increased goodwill impairment chargegenerate additional income of approximately €52 million, and a 1% decrease in the perpetual growth rate applied to each cash generating unit would have resulted in an increased goodwill impairment charge of approximately €27€7.8 million.

Deferred Taxes

We recognizeThe income tax expense (credit) includes the current tax charge (credit) and the deferred tax charge (credit).

Deferred tax assets forare recognized on deductible temporarytiming differences, tax loss carry-forwardscarry forwards and/or tax credit carry-forwards.  We recognize deferred tax liabilities for taxable temporary differences. We adjust our deferredcarry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in prevailing tax laws and rates onat the enactment date.year end. Deferred tax balances are not discounted.

A deferred tax asset is recognized to the extent that we arethe Group is likely to generate sufficient future taxable profits against which the asset can be offset. Deferred tax assets are impaired to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available.

Financial Instruments

The recognition and measurement of financial assets and liabilities is governed by IAS 39,Financial instruments: recognition and measurement.measurement. Financial assets are classified as available-for-sale, held to maturity, assets at fair value through profit and loss,asset derivative instruments, loans and receivables and cash and cash equivalents. Financial liabilities include borrowings, other financing and bank overdrafts, liability derivative instruments and operating payables. These categories and their implications for our consolidated financial statements are described in Note 1.141.15 to our consolidated financial statements.

The determination of the proper classification of financial instruments requires management to exercise judgment, and depends in part on our intention regarding a given financial instrument, which is subject to change. Certain financial instruments (particularly derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting, as described below)accounting) are recorded in our consolidated balance sheet at fair value, and the change in fair value from one period to the next is recorded in our consolidated income statement as part of financial income and expense. Certain other financial instruments are recorded at fair value with the change from one period to the next recorded directly in equity, with the change released to the income statement upon sale or impairment. Certain other instruments are carried on the balance sheet at an amortized cost basis and subjected to impairment testing. Our determ ination regardingdetermination regardi ng the classification of a financial instrument can have a material impact on our results of operations and our consolidated shareholders equity.




7177



Back to Contents


Derivative Financial InstrumentsDiscontinued operations

We use various derivative instruments to manage our exposure to interest rate and foreign exchange risks resulting from our operating, financial and investment activities. Certain transactions performed inIn accordance with our risk management policy do not satisfy hedge accounting criteriaIFRS 5,Non-Current Assets Held for Sale and areDiscontinued Operations, the 2007 results of operations has been re-presented to take into account the divestiture of Clemessy and Crystal in the Energy Services Division in December 2008, the results of which were recorded as trading instruments.results from discontinued operations in 2008. The 2008 and 2007 income statements have been re-presented to classify as income from discontinued operations the results of operations of the following activities that have been divested or are in the process of being sold:

Derivative instruments are recognized

the freight activities and U.K. transportation activities for the Transportation Division;

the waste-to-energy incineration activities in the United States for the Environmental Services Division;

the renewable energy activities for the Energy Services Division.

The following assets and liabilities were classified as assets and liabilities held-for-sale as of December 31, 2009:

transportation activities in Switzerland and the United Kingdom,

Veolia Environmental Services in Ireland and incineration activities in the United States in the Environmental Services Division,

assets held jointly with Suez Environnement in France in the Water Division (as described below),

renewable energy activities in the Energy Services Division, and

all cogeneration activities in the Czech Republic in the Energy Services Division

Pursuant to the reciprocal purchase and sales agreement signed on December 19, 2008 between Suez Environnement and Veolia Environnement, which was to come into effect in 2009, certain assets jointly held with Suez were also reclassified in the balance sheet at fair value. Other than the exceptions detailed below, changes in the fair value of derivative instruments are recorded through the income statement. The fair value of derivatives is estimated using standard valuation models, which take into account active market data.

Net gains and losses on instruments recorded at fair value through profit or loss include flows exchanged and the change in the value of the instrument.

Derivative instruments may be classified as one of three types of hedging relationship: fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or net investment hedge in a foreign operation:

a fair value hedge is a hedge of exposure to changes in fair value of a recognized asset or liability, or an identified portion of such an asset or liability, that is attributable to a particular risk (in particular interest rate or foreign exchange risk), and could affect net income for the period;

a cash flow hedge is a hedge of exposure to variability in cash flows that is attributable to a particular risk associated with a recognized asset or liability or a highly probable forecast transaction (such as a planned purchase or sale) and could affect net income for the period;

a net investment hedge in a foreign operation hedges the exposure to foreign exchange risk of the net assets of a foreign operation including loans considered part of the investment (IAS 21).

An asset, liability, firm commitment, future cash-flow or net investment in a foreign operation qualifies for hedge accounting if:

the hedging relationship is precisely defined and documented at the inception date;

the effectiveness of the hedge is demonstrated at inception and by regular verification of the offsetting nature of movements in the market value of the hedging instrument and the hedged item. The ineffective portion of the hedge is systematically recognized in financial items.

The use of hedge accounting has the following consequences:

in the case of fair value hedges of existing assets and liabilities the hedged portionheld for sale as of these items is measured at fair value in the balance sheet. The gain or loss on remeasurement is recognized in the income statement, where it is offset against matching gains or losses arising on the fair value remeasurement of the hedging financial instrument, to the extent it is effective;

in the case of cash flow hedges, the portion of the gain or loss on the fair value remeasurement of the hedging instrument that is determined to be an effective hedge is recognized directly in equity, while the gain or loss on the fair value remeasurement of the underlying item is not recognized in the balance sheet. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognized. Gains or losses recognized in equity are released to the income statement in the same period or periods in which the assets acquired or liabilities impact the income statement;

in the case of net investment hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognized in translation reserves in equity, while the ineffective portion is recognized in the income statement. Gains and losses recognized in translation reserves are released to the income statement when the foreign operation is sold.

Accounting for concessions

Concession agreements are accounted for in accordance with IFRIC 12,Service Concession Arrangements, published in November 2006. This interpretation, whose adoption by the European Union is still under discussion, is applicable to periods beginning on or after January 1, 2008. In fiscal year 2006, Veolia Environnement elected to adopt IFRIC 12 early, and this change in accounting method was applied retrospectively in accordance with IAS 8 on changes in accounting method. As such, the Veolia Environnement financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20052008. This agreement was still in effect as of December 31, 2009 and the corresponding assets and liabilities therefore remained classified as held for sale as of year end. These transactions were adjusted for the retrospective application of IFRIC 12.completed on March 22, 2010.




7278



Back to Contents


The application of IFRIC 12 is complex and is described in detail in Note 1.20 to our consolidated financial statements.  As a general matter, a contract is considered a concession agreement under IFRIC 12 if a public sector customer (the “grantor”) controls or regulates the services that we must provide with the infrastructure that we use, to whom the services must be provided and at what price, and if the grantor controls a significant residual interest in the infrastructure.  Pursuant to IFRIC 12, the infrastructure used in a concession is not considered to be part of our property, plant and equipment, but instead we recognize financial assets or intangible assets (depending on the nature of our payment rights) in respect of the concession contracts.  

Discontinued operations

Following a decision to dispose of the Danish activities of the transportation division in 2007, the results of this business were transferred to net income from discontinued operations in accordance with IFRS 5 on operations held for sale, and the 2005 and 2006 financial statements were restated accordingly. The 2006 disposal of Southern Water was also recorded in accordance with IFRS 5, and the 2005 financial statements were restated accordingly.




73



Back to Contents


RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Year ended December 31, 20072009 compared to year ended December 31, 20062008

Revenue

Overview

The following table shows a breakdown of our revenuerevenues in 20062008 and 2007:2009:

2007

(in € millions)

2006

(in € millions)

% change 2007/2006

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

32,628.2

28,620.4

14.0%

7.8%

7.1%

(0.9)%

Year ended
December 31, 2009
(€ million)

Year ended
December 31, 2008

(€ million)

% Change
2009/2008

Internal
growth

External
growth

Foreign
exchange
impact

34,551.0

35,764.8

-3.4%

-2.7%

0.2%

-0.9%


Veolia Environnement'sGroup consolidated revenue for the year ended December 31, 2007 amounted to €32,628.2totaled €34,551.0 million compared to €28,620.4€35,764.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, an increase2008, representing a fall of 14.0% at current exchange rates and 14.9%3.4% compared to 2008 (-2.5% at constant exchange rates. Organicrates).

The fall in revenue at constant exchange rates was mainly due to:

a drop in volumes in the Environmental Services Division (volumes collected and placed in landfill sites), which accounted for approximately 1.6% of the decrease in revenue at Group level;

the fall in the price of recycled materials in the Environmental Services Division, which accounted for approximately 0.8% of the decrease in revenue at Group level;

a fall in energy prices, which accounted for approximately 0.4% of the decrease in revenue at Group level;

a reduction in construction work in the Water Division. Growth in engineering-construction activity in the Water Division slowed in 2009, marked by the near completion of some significant construction contracts outside France.

For the first time since the start of the crisis, activity levels stabilized in the fourth quarter of 2009 in the Environmental Services Division, at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates, compared with the fourth quarter of 2008.

External growth was 7.8%, including organic growth of 10.1% recorded outside France.

The 7.1% external growth resulted, in particular, from acquisitions made by Veolia Propreté in the United Kingdom and Germany (a contribution of approximately €1,200 million), by Veolia Energie in Europe and Australia0.2% (€25487.9 million) and by Veolia Transportwas mainly attributable to acquisitions in France2008 and the United States (€161 million). The contribution of acquisitions enabled us to accelerate our growthdivestitures in 2009.

Revenue from outside France where revenue totaled €18,372.3€20,795.6 million, or 56.3%representing 60.2% of total revenue compared to 53.2%with 59.6% in 2006.2008.

The negative impact of the change in average foreign exchange rate movements (a negative impactrates between 2008 and 2009 of €263€326.9 million or 0.9%) primarilymainly reflects the weakeningdepreciation against the Euro of the USpound sterling for €238.3 million, central European currencies (Czech Republic and Poland) for €173.8 million and Northern European currencies (Norway and Sweden) for €87.5 million, partially offset by the appreciation of the U.S. dollar againstfor €162 million.

Overall, revenue fell 2.7% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates, mainly due to the euro (a negative impact of €237 million).

The following table shows a breakdown of our revenue by divisiondecrease in 2006 and 2007:


(in € millions, except for %)

2007

2006

% change 2007/2006

    

Water

10,927.4

10,087.6

8.3%

Environmental Services

9,214.3

7,462.9

23.5%

Energy Services

6,896.4

6,118.4

12.7%

Transportation

5,590.1

4,951.5

12.9%

Total revenue

32,628.2

28,620.4

14.0%

Total revenue at constant 2006 exchange rate

32,891.6

28,620.4

14.9%


Water


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenue within the water division in 2006 and 2007:


2007

(in € millions)

2006

(in € millions)

% change 2007/2006

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

10,927.4

10,087.6

8.3%

7.9%

1.1%

(0.7)%


In France, organic growthactivity in the water division was 4.6% in 2007, boosted by a broader services offering and robust growth in engineering work. This performance was achieved in spiteEnvironmental Services Division (drop of lower volumes due in particular to cool summer weather.



74



Back to Contents


Outside France, revenue was up 10.8% in 2007 (or 10.3%7.8% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates). In Europe, despite a decrease in BOT engineering work (Brussels and The Hague), the division recorded growth of 3.8% in 2007 (2.3% at constant scope and exchange rates) reflecting the start-up of new contracts signed in 2006, in particular in Central Europe.

In the Asia/Pacific region, the water division recorded very strong growth in revenue of almost 48% in 2007 (47% at constant scope and exchange rates), largely driven by the start-up of new contracts in China (Shenzhen, Lanzhou and Kunming), Australia (Gold Coast and seawater desalination plant in Sydney), South Korea and Japan.

Business was also strong in the Africa/Middle East region, where revenues grew by 18.1% (19.3% at constant scope and exchange rates) thanks to growth in business in Morocco and the construction of a seawater desalination plant in the Sultanate of Oman.

Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies posted revenue of €1,881 million in 2007, up 12.8% compared to 2006, principally due to the strength of the "Design and Build" business for municipal and industrial customers, which was particularly pronounced in the Middle East (Marafiq and the industrial contract with Shell in Qatar).

Environmental Services


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenues within the environmental services (waste management) division in 2006 and 2007:


2007

(in € millions)

2006

(in € millions)

% change 2007/2006

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

9,214.3

7,462.9

23.5%

7.5%

18.0%

(2.0)%


In France, revenue increased by 7.1% in 2007 (or 6.6% at constant scope) as a result of strong price increases for recycled materials (paper, metals), higher tonnages in the collection and sorting-recycling of solid waste, waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) operations and the treatment of polluted soil, the increase in tonnages to landfills and the good level of business activity at incineration plants.

Outside France, we recorded 35.6% revenue growth in 2007, including 7.9% growth at constant scope and exchange rates that came from all regions.  Organic growth was significant in the United Kingdom with the start-up of new integrated contracts (Shropshire) and the expansion of existing integrated contracts (East Sussex and Nottinghamshire), and also in Scandinavia with an increase in the recycling business in Norway. In North America, revenues declined by 0.3% as a result of the weakening of the dollar, but the business achieved growth 7.7% at constant scope and exchange rates, driven mainly by the momentum in industrial services and the incineration business.

External growth of 18.0% in 2007 mainly reflected the full-year effect of the acquisitions of Cleanaway in the United Kingdom and Biffa in Belgium, and the acquisitions in 2007 of Sulo (consolidated since July 2nd) in Germany and of TMT in Italy.

Energy Services


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenues within the energy services division in 2006 and 2007:


2007

(in € millions)

2006

(in € millions)

% change 2007/2006

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

6,896.4

6,118.4

12.7%

7.9%

4.6%

0.2%


The effects of mild weather in the first months of 2007 in Europe (where the bulk of our Energy Services revenues are generated) were partly offset by colder weather in the fourth quarter of 2007.



75



Back to Contents


In France, revenue grew 9.0% (8.2% at constant scope), due to commercial development and an increase in the volume of engineering work. This performance was achieved despite the impact of the mild winter weather and a slight decline in average energy prices.

Outside France, the impact of the weather was offset by our recent business development, which generated both organic and external growth, in particular in Central Europe (Hungary, Czech Republic and Slovakia), the United Kingdom, Italy and Australia. Accordingly, total growth in revenue outside France amounted to 18.3%.

Transportation


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenues within the transportation division in 2006 and 2007:


2007

(in € millions)

2006

(in € millions)

% change 2007/2006

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

5,590.1

4,951.5

12.9%

8.1%

5.9%

(1.1)%


Revenue in France rose by 9.8% (4.3% at constant scope), driven by the development of business in the Paris region (Île-de-France), and in urban (Bordeaux, Nice and Toulon) and intercity networks, and the impact of the full-year contribution from SNCM.

Outside France, revenue increased by 14.9% (10.4% at constant scope and exchange rates) reflecting the full impact of business development in North America (impact from the full-year contribution from Supershuttle and a good level of business activity), the growth in business activity in Australia as well as in Europe.

Revenue by geographical region


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenue by geographical region:


(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

% Change 2007/2006

% Change 2007/2006 (constant exchange rates)

France

14,255.9

13,403.0

6.4%

6.4%

United Kingdom

2,945.7

2,186.8

34.7%

35.5%,

Germany

2,702.9

1,992.9

35.6%

35.6%

Other European countries

6,033.3

5,317.9

13.5%

12.4%

United States

2,580.4

2,650.3

(2.6)%

6.3%

Oceania

1,308.2

931.4

40.5%

38.1%

Asia

961.0

770.9

24.7%

30.8%

Rest of the world (including the Middle East)

1,840.8

1,367.2

34.6%

37.3%

Revenue

32,628.2

28,620.4

14.0%

14.9%



France

Revenue growth in France totaled 6.4% in 2007, despite unfavorable weather conditions, which negatively affected Water activities in the third quarter and Energy Services at the beginning of the year. Conversely, Veolia Eau benefited from continued vigorous growth in engineering and construction work and Veolia Energie from new industrial and municipal contracts. Veolia Propreté’s growth was linked to increased production levels at the new incineration plants and an increase in solid and toxic waste tonnage collected and treated under high value-added service contracts. In addition to the full year impact of the consolidation of SNCM, Veolia Transport benefited from sustained activity growth in intercity transit systems and in the greater Paris region.



76



Back to Contents


United Kingdom

Revenue grew by 35.5% in 2007 on a constant exchange rate basis. This growth was attributable to the acquisition of Cleanaway UK (full year impact compared to one quarter in 2006) in the environmental services division, commercial development and small acquisitions by Veolia Energie, and the acquisition of the non-regulated activities of Thames Water by Veolia Eau (one month contribution).


Germany

Revenue growth in Germany totaled 35.6% in 2007 and was primarily attributable to the acquisition of the Sulo Group by Veolia Propreté, an increase in sales under the Braunschweig contract (Veolia Eau), the impact of acquisitions in 2006 and the organic growth of railway activities (Veolia Transport).


Other European countries

Revenue growth of 13.5% in 2007 (12.4% on a constant exchange rate basis) was mainly due to the expansion of Veolia Energie in Southern Europe, the acquisition of TMT in Italy by Veolia Propreté (3 months of revenue contribution) and the growth in Veolia Eau and Veolia Energie activities in Central Europe.


United States

Revenue growth of 6.3% at constant exchange rates in 2007 was particularly strong across all Veolia Propreté activities and in Veolia Transport, where the full effect of recent contract wins and acquisitions was felt. The acquisition of Thermal North America Inc by Veolia Energie did not contribute to 2007 revenue.


Oceania

40.5% revenue growth in Oceania in 2007 (38.1% at constant exchange rates) was driven by Veolia Eau contracts in Australia (Gold Coast and desalination plant in Sydney), the acquisition of TDU in Australia by Veolia Energie and the increase in contract revenue under the Veolia Transport Melbourne contract.


Asia

Growth of 24.7% in Asia was mainly driven by Veolia Eau and attributable to recent developments (contracts in China and acquisitions in Japan), by Veolia Propreté and by Veolia Energie with the start-up of new contracts.


Rest of the world

Revenue growth of 34.6% was marked by the steady growth of Veolia Eau activities in North Africa and new contracts won by this Division in the Middle East.


Operating Income


Overview


The Group’s operating income increased by 17.1%, from €2,132.9 million in 2006 to €2,496.9 million in 2007.  Adjusted operating income increased by 11.1%, from €2,222.2 million in 2006 to €2,469.2 million in 2007.  The following table shows a breakdown of operating income and adjusted operating income by division in 2006 and 2007:

 

Operating income

Adjusted operating income

 

2007

2006

%

change

2007

2006

%

change

Water

1,267.7

1,160.6

9.2%

1,265.7

1,163.4

8.8%

Environmental Services

803.5

648.3

23.9%

803.5

648.3

23.9%

Energy Services

398.7

377.7

5.6%

388.2

377.7

2.8%

Transportation

130.3

13.6

858.1%

115.1

100.1

15.0%

Unallocated

(103.3)

(67.3)

-

(103.3)

(67.3)

-

Total

2,496.9

2,132.9

17.1%

2,469.2

2,222.2

11.1%

Total at 2006 exchange rates

2,513.9

2,132.9

17.9%

2,486.2

2,222.2

11.9%




77



Back to Contents


As discussed above under “Presentation of Information in this Section – Non-GAAP Measures,” we use adjusted operating income, in addition to operating income, to evaluate the Group’s results of operations and otherwise as a management tool.  The following table shows a reconciliation of the Group’s operating income and adjusted operating income by division in 2006 and 2007:


2007

Total Operating Income

Adjustments

Adjusted Operating Income

(€ million)

Impairment

Other

Water

1,267.7

(2.0)

 

1,265.7

Environmental Services

803.5

-

-

803.5

Energy Services

398.7

(10.5)

 

388.2

Transportation

130.3

(5.7)

(9.5)(1)

115.1

Unallocated

(103.3)

-

-

(103.3)

Total

2,496.9

(18.2)

(9.5)

2,469.2


(1)

Represents primarily operating income resulting from the completion of our purchase of our interest in SNCM, as discussed under “ — Transportation” below.



2006

Total Operating Income

Adjustments

Adjusted Operating Income

(€ million)

Impairment

Other

Water

1,160.6

2.8

-

1,163.4

Environmental Services

648.3

-

-

648.3

Energy Services

377.7

-

-

377.7

Transportation

13.6

86.5

-

100.1

Unallocated

(67.3)

-

-

(67.3)

Total

2,132.9

89.3

-

2,222.2


Operating income increased 17.1% year-on-year, or by 17.9% at constant exchange rates. Adjusted operating income grew by 11.1%, or by 11.9% at constant exchange rates.  The increases mainly reflect growth in our revenues and overall business resulting from the factors described above in the discussion or our revenue growth, offset in part by an increase in unallocated operating losses, as described below.  Operating income growth also benefited from a significant decrease in impairment charges, which are excluded from the calculation of adjusted operating income.  As noted above, we recorded significant losses in our transportation division in Germany in 2006, primarily as a result of impairment charges, as discussed in more detail below.  We also recorded €106.6 million of capital gains from asset disposals in 2007, compared to €50.9 million in 2006.  Our capital gains in each year reflect ed primarily the sale of minority interests in our consolidated subsidiaries, discussed in more detail below.


Operating income in 2007 represented 7.7% of revenues compared to 7.5% in 2006.  Adjusted operating income represented 7.6% of revenues in 2007 compared to 7.8% in 2006.  The decline in overall operating income margin (adjusted operating income as a percentage of revenues) reflected primarily the rapid growth of engineering business in the water division, as well as services activities in the energy services division, which in both cases carry lower margins than some of our other activities.  General and administrative expenses decreased as a percentage of revenues (9.1% in 2006 and 8.4% in 2007), reflecting our continuing efforts to improve efficiency.    

Water


The water division reported a 9.2% increase in operating income, from €1,160.6 million in 2006 to €1,267.7 million in 2007. Adjusted operating income increased by 8.8% in 2007 or by 9.3% at constant exchange rates.

In France, productivity efforts, the development of new services and the continued good level of construction activities offset the impact of a decline in volumes delivered.



78



Back to Contents


In Europe, Asia and the United States, growth in operating income benefited from the start-up of new contracts and the positive effect of contracts reaching maturity. Growth in Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies business also contributed to the increase in adjusted operating income, despite a temporary delay in the delivery of the Brussels facility. Finally, Veolia Eau also benefited in 2007 from the definitive resolution of the dispute with the Land of Berlin concerning rainwater activities and a dilution capital gain resulting from the acquisition by the EBRD of a stake in Veolia Voda, the holding company for Central European activities.  

The operating margin (adjusted operating income/revenue) increased 0.1 point from 11.5% in 2006 to 11.6% in 2007, despite an increase in the contribution of lower-margin engineering and construction activities. The ratio of operating income to revenues in the water division also increased from 11.5% in 2006 to 11.6% in 2007.

Environmental Services


The Environmental Services division reported a 23.9% increase in operating income (26.4% at constant exchange rates) from €648.3 million in 2006 to €803.5 million in 2007. Operating income was equal to adjusted operating income in both years.

Operating performance in France benefited from the combined impact of an increase in volumes processed, in particular by incineration and landfill site activities, and the strong performance of toxic waste activities.

Outside France, the increase in operating income was particularly high in the U.K. market, following the consolidation of Cleanaway United Kingdom in the fourth quarter of 2006 and the good performance of integrated municipal waste management contracts in this country. In Germany, the consolidation of Sulo with effect from July 2, 2007 provided a significant contribution. In the United States, operating income increased substantially for high-growth industrial services and in the solid waste business thanks to price increases.

The operating margin (adjusted operating income / revenue) remained stable at 8.7% in 2006 and 2007.  Given that there were no adjustments in the environmental services division in 2006 and 2007, the ratio of operating income to revenues was equal to the ratio of adjusted operating income to revenues in each year.

Energy Services


The Energy Services Division reported a 5.6% increase in operating income from €377.7 million in 2006 to €398.7 million in 2007. Adjusted operating income rose 2.8% in 2007, or 1.8% at constant exchange rates.  The difference between operating income and adjusted operating income in 2007 reflected primarily the impact of negative goodwill recorded following employee share subscriptions at a division affiliate in Poland.

In France, profitability benefited from an improvement in construction activities. Harsh weather conditions at the end of the year helped partially offset the impact of the mild weather in the opening months of 2007.

In Europe, operating income increased significantly in Central Europe, thanks to an increase in electricity sales prices (Czech Republic and Romania) and the impact of acquisitions (Hungary), partially offset by an increase in the price of gas in the Baltic States. In Southern Europe, operating income benefited from commercial development in Italy.

Due to the impact of weather conditions, the reduction in the sales of CO² allowances and the development of lower margin service activities, the operating margin (adjusted operating income / revenue) fell from 6.2% in 2006 to 5.6% in 2007.  The ratio of operating income to revenues was 6.2% in 2006 and 5.8% in 2007, as the 2007 figure reflected the impact of the negative goodwill in Poland, described above.

Transportation


The transportation division reported operating income of €130.3 million in 2007, compared to €13.6 million in 2006. Transportation division operating income in 2006 included impairment charges €86.5 million recognized in Germany, while 2007 operating income reflected the impact of the finalization of the SNCM opening balance sheet (positive impact of €20.5 million, including the impact of negative goodwill and net provisions for contracts) and impairment charges relating to the Eurolines activity (charge of €6.9 million).  



79



Back to Contents


Adjusted operating income increased 15% from €100.1 million in 2006 to €115.1 million in 2007.  In addition, a dilution gain of €18.7 million was realized in 2006 following the acquisition by the EBRD of a stake in Central European companies.

In France, the profitability of the passenger transport business improved, particularly intercity activities and activities in the greater Paris region, and the division also recorded improvements resulting from the consolidation of SNCM.

International activities were boosted by solid performances in Belgium and Australia, by the full-year impact of acquisitions in North America (in particular ATC and Shuttleport) and by the turnaround of activities in Germany. However the start-up of the Limburg and Brabant contracts had a negative impact on the results for the year.

Following a review of division assets with a view to improving profitability, Veolia Transport sold its activities in Denmark and Spain. The results of the Danish activities are recorded as income and expense from discontinued operations, while the results of the Spanish activities were recorded in the transportation division, as they did not constitute a major line of business or geographical area unit under IFRS.

Operating margin (adjusted operating income / revenue) improved from 2.0% in 2006 to 2.1% in 2007.  The ratio of operating income to revenue, impacted in both years by the adjustment items referred to above, was 0.3% in 2006 and 2.3% in 2007.

Unallocated Operating Income (loss)

Unallocated operating income (loss) represents primarily items recorded at the holding company level. Our unallocated operating loss increased from €67.3 million in 2006 to €103.3 million in 2007, primarily as a result in share based compensation expenses and charges relating to employee savings plans recorded under IFRS 2, as well as an increase in research and development expenditures and the centralization of civil liability insurance costs (which correspondingly reduced insurance costs at the division level).    

Finance costs, net


Finance costs, net represent the cost of gross financial fair value debt, including profit and loss on related interest rate and exchange rate hedging, less income on cash and cash equivalents. The following table shows a breakdown of the Group’s finance costs, net:


(in € millions)

2007

2006

   

Income

152.5

82.8

Expense

(969.6)

(783.8)

Finance costs, net

(817.1)

(701.0)


The increase in net finance costs reflects:

the increase in average net financial debt from €14,001 million for 2006 to €14,609 million for 2007, as a result of the investment and growth policy,

the increase in floating rates due to tension in the European, U.S. and U.K. interbank markets starting in the summer of 2007,

the increase in the average maturity of debt following long-maturity issues (euro issue maturing 2022 and sterling issue maturing 2037).


The financing rate (defined as the ratio of net finance costs, excluding fair value adjustments on financial instruments not qualifying for hedge accounting, to average quarterly net financial debt) increased from 5.07% in 2006 to 5.49% in 2007.



80



Back to Contents


Fair value adjustments on financial instruments not qualifying for hedge accounting represented losses of €15.4 million in 2007, compared to gains of €6.4 million in 2006. These adjustments, which are calculated in accordance with IAS 39 and depend on market conditions at the balance sheet date, are highly volatile.

Other Financial Income (Expenses)


The following table shows a breakdown of our other financial income (expenses):

(€ million)

2007

2006

Net gains on loans and receivables

56.8

21.5

Net gains and losses on available-for-sale assets (including dividends)

10.3

9.7

Assets and liabilities at fair value through the Income Statement

5.5

(21.6)

Unwinding of the discount on provisions

(60.8)

(15.9)

Foreign exchange gains and losses

(2.8)

(14.3)

Other income (expenses)

(7.6)

(13.4)

Other financial income and expenses

1.4

(34.0)



Other financial incomerevenues by Division in 2009 and expenses improved from a net expense of €34.0 million in 2006 to a net income of €1.4 million in 2007. This improvement in the contribution of other financial income and expenses was mainly due to:2008:

a reduction in the foreign exchange losses of €11.5 million,

the impact of the fair value measurement of embedded derivatives for €26.9 million (other income (expenses)); the fair value measurement of derivatives embedded in contracts and in particular certain industrial contracts in South Korea had a positive impact of €10.6 million in 2007, compared to a negative impact of €16.3 million in 2006, and

the increase in net gains on loans and receivables of €34.6 million (including interest income on the Berlin Lander rainwater receivable of €26.5 million).


These improvements were partially offset by an increase in the charge in respect of the unwinding of the discount on provisions of €44.9 million. In 2007, the increase in this charge on long-term provisions related to SNCM (provisions for onerous contracts), pension obligations and provisions for closure and post-closure costs for waste storage facilities in the environmental services division.

Income Tax Expense


The consolidated income tax expense of the Group for 2007 was €420.1 million (current tax expense of €416.3 million and deferred tax expense of €3.8 million), compared to €409.6 million for 2006 (current tax expense of €330.9 million and deferred tax expense of  €78.7 million). The increase in the income tax expense in 2007 was due to:

an increase in the scope of consolidation of the Group and pre-tax income, increasing both the current and deferred tax expense;

a reduction in tax rates in a sizeable number of countries with a total positive impact of €62.0 million relating to deferred tax liability balances (including a positive impact of €54.6 million in Germany and the United Kingdom); and

an improvement in the outlook for the use of ordinary tax losses of the U.S. tax group, generating an additional deferred tax credit of €85 million, resulting primarily from the integration of Thermal North America Inc., as well as to an improved outlook for environmental services activities.

In 2006 we recorded a deferred tax credit of €86.2 million relating to the restructuring of our U.S. tax group.  This tax credit and the 2007 tax credit referred to above result from tax losses relating to the activities of our former subsidiary U.S. Filter, and are currently being reviewed by the U.S. tax authorities at our request.  See Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements for additional details.



81



Back to Contents


Excluding the U.S. tax credits in 2006 and a tax benefit relating to an SNCM tax election in 2007, our income tax expense decreased from €495.8 in 2006 million to €431.1 million in 2007.  

Our effective income tax rate decreased from 29.3% in 2006 to 25.0% in 2007, primarily as a result of the tax rate reductions and recognition of additional deferred tax assets related to United States tax losses, as described above.

Share of Net Income of Associates


The share of net income of associates increased from €6.0 million in 2006 to €16.9 million in 2007. The increase in the net income of associates is mainly due to improvement in the results of Veolia Propreté associates in Taiwan and the inclusion of the associates of the Sulo sub-group (Veolia Propreté, Germany).

Net Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations


The net loss from discontinued operations was €23.2 million in 2007 (including impairment losses of €21.3 million in respect of the Transportation business in Denmark), compared to net income of €0.6 million in 2006 (which reflected income from Southern Water and losses, including impairment charges, from the Danish transportation business, as discussed in more detail below).


Net income for the year attributable to minority interests


Net income for the year attributable to minority interests was €326.9 million for 2007, compared to €236.2 million for 2006. This line item reflects minority interests in water division subsidiaries (€178.9 million in 2007), environmental services division subsidiaries (€21.8 million), energy division subsidiaries (€96.4 million) and transportation division subsidiaries (€28.9 million). The increase between 2006 and 2007 mainly concerns the water division in Germany, following the positive outcome to the dispute with the Berlin Lander, and the transportation division, as a result of the consolidation of SNCM for a full year.

In 2006, net income for the year attributable to minority interests totaled €236.2 million and mainly concerned minority interests in water division subsidiaries (€115.7 million), environmental services division subsidiaries (€18.6 million), energy division subsidiaries (€87.1 million) and transportation division subsidiaries (€14.7 million).

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent


Net income for the year attributable to equity holders of the parent was €927.9 million in 2007, compared to €758.7 million in 2006.  Adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent was €933.2 million in 2007, compared to €762.0 million in 2006.

Adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent for the year ended December 31, 2007 is determined as follows:

Fiscal year 2007

(€ million)

Net Income

Adjustments

Adjusted Net Income

Operating income

2,496.9

(27.7)

2,469.2

Net finance costs

(817.1)

-

(817.1)

Other financial income and expenses

1.4

4.6

6.0

Income tax expense

(420.1)

(11.0)(1)

(431.1)

Share of net income of associates

16.9

-

16.9

Net loss from discontinued operations

(23.2)

23.2

-

Minority interests

(326.9)

16.2

(310.7)

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent

927.9

5.3

933.2

    

(1)

Represents the impact of a change in tax status relating to SNCM.

   




82



Back to Contents


Adjusted net income for the year ended December 31, 2006 is determined as follows:

Fiscal year 2006

(€ million)

Net Income

Adjustments

Adjusted Net Income

Operating income

2,132.9

89.3

2,222.2

Net finance costs

(701.0)

-

(701.0)

Other financial income and expenses

(34.0

-

(34.0)

Income tax expense

(409.6)

(86.2)

(495.8)

Share of net income of associates

6.0

-

6.0

Net income from discontinued operations

0.6

(0.6)

-

Minority interests

(236.2)

(0.8)

(235.4)

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent

758.7

(3.3)

762.0


Given the weighted average number of shares outstanding of 430.0 million in 2007 and 398.8 million in 2006 (adjusted for the share capital increase in July 2007), earnings per share attributable to equity holders of the parent was €2.16 in 2007, compared to €1.90 in 2006 (adjusted for the share capital increase in July 2007).  Adjusted net income per share was €2.17 in 2007, compared to €1.91 in 2006 (adjusted for the share capital increase in July 2007).


Year ended December 31, 2006 compared to year ended December 31, 2005

Revenue

Overview

Our consolidated revenue for the year ending December 31, 2006 grew 11.9% to €28,620.4 million, compared to €25,570.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. Organic growth was 8.1% in 2006.

External growth of 3.8% was primarily the result of acquisitions made by Veolia Transport in France and the United States (a combined contribution of approximately €443 million) and Veolia Propreté in the United Kingdom (a contribution of approximately €215 million). Revenue from outside France in 2006 was €15,217.4 million, or 53.2% of the total, compared with 51.3% in 2005.

The currency effect was neutral, with a weakening of the U.S. dollar (negative impact of €53.5 million) offset by a strengthening of the Czech koruna (positive impact of €44.7 million).

The following table shows a breakdown of our revenue in 2005 and 2006:

2006

(in € millions)

2005

(in € millions)

% change 2006/2005

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

28,620.4

25,570.4

11.9%

8.1%

3.8%

-


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenue by division in 2005 and 2006:


(in € millions, except for %)

2006

2005

% change 2006/2005

    

Water

10,087.6

9,134.2

10.4%

Environmental Services

7,462.9

6,748.7

10.6%

Energy Services

6,118.4

5,463.6

12.0%

Transportation

4,951.5

4,223.9

17.2%

Total revenue

28,620.4

25,570.4

11.9%

Total revenue at constant 2005 exchange rate

28,631.0

25,570.4

11.9%



83



Back to Contents

(€ million)

Year ended
December 31, 2009

Year ended
December 31, 2008

% Change
2009/2008

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Revenue

12,555.9

9,055.8

7,078.6

5,860.7

34,551.0

12,557.9

9,972.5

7,446.3

5,788.1

35,764.8

0.0%

-9.2%

-4.9%

1.3%

- -3.4%

Revenue at 2008 exchange rates

34,877.9

35,764.8

-2.5%


Water


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenues within the water divisionDivision in 20052009 and 2006:2008:


2006

(in € millions)

2005

(in € millions)

% change 2006/2005

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

10,087.6

9,134.2

10.4%

9.1%

1.2%

0.1%

Year ended December 31, 2009
(€ million)

Year ended December 31,
2008
(€ million)

% Change
2009/2008

Internal
growth

External
growth

Foreign
exchange
impact

12,555.9

12,557.9

0.0%

-0.4%

0.6%

-0.2%


In France, organic revenue growth was 3.6%activity levels remained stable (+0.1% on a current basis and -0.3% at constant consolidation scope), despite a 0.2% fall in 2006,volumes distributed compared to 2008 and a slight decrease in engineering activity (-2% at constant consolidation scope).

Outside France and excluding Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies, revenue increased by 0.4% (+0.2% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates) despite several major BOT (Build Operate & Transfer) contracts in Europe and the Middle East and DBO (Design Build & Operate) contracts in Australia coming to the end of the construction phase. The fall of 3.7% in Europe (-0.4% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates) reflects the completion of construction work on BOT contracts in the United Kingdom and Brussels and a slight decrease in volumes. The 20.4% increase in revenue in Asia (12% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates) is mainly due to a good performance of the distribution businesses as well as further growthengineering work and scope extensions in the water network buildingcertain Chinese metropolitan areas (primarily Shanghai, Shenzhen and renovation business.Tianjin Shibei).

Outside France, excluding Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies and Proactiva,reported a 2.2% decrease in revenue grew 13.6% in 2006 (11.8%to €2,469.9 million (-1.8% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates). In Europe, revenue growth of 11.4%Activity was drivenaffected by the start-upcompletion of newcertain major contracts in particular in Germany (the Braunschweig municipal contract),outside France and the slowdown in the Czech Republic (Hradec Kralove and Prostejov) and in Slovakia (Poprad and Banska Bystrica). In the Asia-Pacific region, strong revenue growth of 36.2% (of which 26.9% was organic growth) was mainly driven by new contracts signed in China (Hohhot, Changzhou, Kunming and Urumqui in the municipal sector). External growth in this region was the result of Veolia Water’s increased stake in the Adelaide contract in Australia and small acquisitions in Japan. We continued our expansion in Africa and the Middle East where growth exceeded 12%. In North America, revenue grew 4.6% in 2006, or 6.7% based on a constant scope and exchange rate.  

Veolia Water Solutions and Technologies posted revenue growth of 17.8% at constant scope and exchange rates, driven in particular by a sharp upturn in the engineering and construction businesses in France, the Middle East and the United States.  Including acquisitions made during the year, revenue growth totaled 21.8%.industrial economic environment.

Environmental Services


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenues within the Environmental Services (waste management) divisionDivision in 20052009 and 2006:2008:

Year ended
December 31, 2009
(€ million)

Year ended
December 31,
2008
(€ million)

% Change
2009/2008

Internal
growth

External
growth

Foreign
exchange
impact

9,055.8

9,972.5

-9.2 %

-7.8%

-0.1%

-1.3%


2006

(in € millions)

2005

(in € millions)

% change 2006/2005

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

7,462.9

6,748.7

10.6%

7.6%

3.5%

(0.5)%


In the Environmental Services (waste management) business, revenue in France grew 4.1% (of which 3.7% was organic growth), driven by the combined effectThe economic crisis affected volumes of the growing contribution of new incineration plantssolid and the increased tonnages of solidhazardous waste collected and treated under high value added service contracts.on behalf of industrial customers, although to varying degrees depending on the country and activity sector, and also, to a lesser extent, municipal customers.



80



Back to Contents


Revenue from sales of recycled materials (which contributed approximately 7% of Division revenue in 2009) remained down: average annual prices of recycled materials (paper, cardboard, ferrous and non-ferrous metal) remained significantly lower than in 2008, with the price of paper and cardboard reporting a progressive rise later in 2009. The price of ferrous metal and certain non-ferrous metals remains however significantly below 2008 levels.

In France, revenue slumped 10.8% (-9.3% at constant consolidation scope) due to a drop in industrial and commercial volumes linked to the economic slowdown and the decline in recycled material prices.

Outside France, excluding Proactiva, organic growthactivity reported a downturn of 8.6% (-7.4% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates). The majority of geographical areas were affected by the economic context. The 8.9% fall in revenue in Germany (-11.3% at constant consolidation scope), was 10.8%. It was particularly strongdue to a reduction in volumes and prices in the paper business and a decrease in industrial waste volumes. Revenue in the United States in all business lines (13.2%Kingdom (down 12.9% on a current basis and down 3.7% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates) was affected by a decrease in industrial waste and volumes placed in landfill sites, although the positive contribution of integrated contracts helped limit this impact. In North America (down 4.2% on a current basis and down 9.1% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates), a decrease in volumes collected affected all businesses but was offset in certain cases by price increases. Th e Asia-Pacific region (down 7.8% on a current basis and down 8.6% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates) primarily suffered from a decrease in the level of services and industrial waste.

At constant consolidation scope and exchange rates, or 11.0% at current exchange rates). Inrevenue was stable in the United Kingdom, overall growth totaled 34.2% (of which 6.9% was organic growth), driven byfourth quarter of 2009 compared to the acquisitionfourth quarter of Cleanaway UK, completed on September 28, 2006 and by2008, reflecting the general developmentstabilization of economic conditions in the business within a growing market. In Asia, the start-upsecond half of the Foshan and Guanghzou-Likeng contracts made a significant contribution to revenue growth of 14%.2009.

Energy Services


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenues within the Energy Services Division in 2009 and 2008:

Year ended
December 31,
2009
(€ million)

Year ended
December 31,
2008
(€ million)

% Change
2009/2008

Internal
growth

External
growth

Foreign
exchange
impact

7,078.6

7,446.3

-4.9%

-2.2%

-0.8%

-1.9%


Energy Services Division revenue fell 4.9% (-2.2% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates). This decrease was mainly due to a slowdown in works and service activities on behalf of industrial customers and the negative effect of energy prices (-€139.5 million compared to 2008, primarily relating to natural gas sales that are made on a “pass-through” basis to customers). Overall, the impact of the weather was stable on 2009. The negative foreign exchange impact of €139.5 million is mainly attributable to Central European currencies.

In France, revenue fell 5.1% (-5.0% at constant consolidation scope) due to a negative price impact in the second half of the year and a slight contraction in the services divisionbusiness.

Outside France, the activity growth of 0.6% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates (a decline of 5% on a current basis) was due to the increase in 2005energy prices in Central Europe and 2006:the Baltic States. Construction work and service activities on behalf of industrial customers fell in Europe and particularly Southern Europe.



81


2006

(in € millions)

2005

(in € millions)

% change 2006/2005

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

6,118.4

5,463.6

12.0%

10.0%

1.5%

0.5%


Back to Contents


Transportation

The following table shows a breakdown of our revenues within the Transportation Division in 2009 and 2008:

Year ended
December 31, 2009
(€ million)

Year ended
December 31,
2008

(€ million)

% Change
2009/2008

Internal
growth

External
growth

Foreign
exchange
impact

5,860.7

5,788.1

1.3%

0.4%

1.5%

-0.6%


Passenger transport revenue rose 0.5% in France (fall of 0.9% at constant consolidation scope). Price adjustments and new contract wins (TPMR Toulouse, Louviers Urban, “Fil Vert de Touraine”) offset the impact of the loss of the Bordeaux contract in May 2009. Revenue was also negatively impacted by a decline in the airport and tourism businesses, in particular due to the economic environment.

Outside France, revenue increased 1.7% (1.0% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates), reflecting the full-year impact of contracts that started mid-year in 2008 in North America and Germany, and despite the loss of the Melbourne contract in December and the Stockholm contract in November (negative impact of €34 million in 2009 compared to 2008) which had a limited impact on 2009, but will have a more significant impact in 2010.

External growth of 1.5% reflects the expansion of the partnership with RATP in Asia (Hong Kong and Nanjing Zhongbei tramways in China) and limited acquisitions in France and the United States.



82



Back to Contents


Revenue by geographical region

The following table shows a breakdown of our revenue by geographical region and Operating segment (Division):

Year ended
December 31,
2009

(€ million)

France

Germany

United
Kingdom

Other
European
countries

United
States

Oceania

Asia

Middle
East

Rest of
the world

Total

Water

4,751.2

1,371.8

640.0

1,637.9

690.5

255.8

1,162.0

857.5

1,189.2

12,555.9

Environmental Services

3,294.2

1,011.3

1,446.0

1,098.9

1,142.6

441.4

209.4

75.0

337.0

9,055.8

Energy Services

3,435.9

57.9

342.4

2,633.5

261.9

42.2

67.7

62.5

174.6

7,078.6

Transportation

2,274.1

526.3

49.8

1,440.9

858.0

560.8

61.6

22.6

66.6

5,860.7

Revenue

13,755.4

2,967.3

2,478.2

6,811.2

2,953.0

1,300.2

1,500.7

1,017.6

1,767.4

34,551.0


Year ended
December 31,
2008

(€ million)

France

Germany

United
Kingdom

Other
European
countries

United
States

Oceania

Asia

Middle
East

Rest of
the world

Total

Water

4,883.5

1,376.7

671.5

1,679.7

612.2

358.5

976.9

862.1

1,136.8

12,557.9

Environmental Services

3,693.9

1,108.8

1,667.7

1,195.6

1,178.8

479.3

226.7

79.9

341.8

9,972.5

Energy Services

3,625.1

57.8

487.9

2,595.1

322.0

53.4

56.0

60.6

188.4

7,446.3

Transportation

2,262.5

514.0

49.8

1,559.1

760.4

546.5

10.3

24.2

61.3

5,788.1

Revenue

14,465.0

3,057.3

2,876.9

7,029.5

2,873.4

1,437.7

1,269.9

1,026.8

1,728.3

35,764.8


Change

(€ million)

France

Germany

United
Kingdom

Other
European
countries

United
States

Oceania

Asia

Middle
East

Rest of
the world

Total

Water

(132.3)

(4.9)

(31.5)

(41.8)

78.3

(102.7)

185.1

(4.6)

52.4

(2.0)

Environmental Services

(399.7)

(97.5)

(221.7)

(96.7)

(36.2)

(37.9)

(17.3)

(4.9)

(4.8)

(916.7)

Energy Services

(189.2)

0.1

(145.5)

38.4

(60.1)

(11.2)

11.7

1.9

(13.8)

(367.7)

Transportation

11.6

12.3

0.0

(118.2)

97.6

14.3

51.3

(1.6)

5.3

72.6

Revenue

(709.6)

(90.0)

(398.7)

(218.3)

79.6

(137.5)

230.8

(9.2)

39.1

(1 213.8)

% Change

-4.9%

-2.9%

-13.9%

-3.1%

2.8%

-9.6%

18.2%

-0.9%

2.3%

-3.4%

% Change (at constant exchange rates)

-4.9%

-2.9%

-5.5%

1.1%

-2.8%

-8.6%

11.7%

-1.4%

3.7%

-2.5%




83



Back to Contents


Revenue trends have been affected by the fallout from the economic crisis, which is nonetheless variable between geographical areas and depends in particular on the mix of different Group businesses and the relative weight of the Environmental Services Division.

France

Revenue fell 4.9% in 2009; the Environmental Services business reported a slump of 10.8% in France (-9.3% at constant consolidation scope) due to a fall in industrial and commercial volumes associated with the economic slowdown and a decrease in the price of recycled materials.

The Water business also contracted primarily due to a 0.2% fall in volumes distributed compared to 2008. Finally, the Energy Services Division was affected by an unfavorable price effect in the second half of the year and a slight decrease in the services business.

Germany

The 2.9% fall in revenue was due to the marked decrease in activities in the Environmental Services Division (fall in the price of recycled raw materials and particularly paper and decrease in industrial and commercial waste collection volumes). Water Division activities were relatively stable and in particular the Braunschweig contract and activities in the Transportation Division enjoyed good organic growth.

United Kingdom

Revenue fell 5.5% in the United Kingdom, at constant exchange rates. Activity levels benefited from the ramp-up of new integrated contracts in the Environmental Services Division, despite a fall in volumes of close to 14% (collection and landfill sites). The decrease reported by the Water Division businesses was mainly due to the completion of a construction worksite in the non-regulated operations sector. Revenue in the Energy Services Division fell following the sale of Facilities Management activities in the United Kingdom.

Other European countries

Revenue growth at constant exchange rates was 1.1%. This was achieved thanks to the development of Energy Services businesses in the Baltic States and Central Europe (positive price and weather effects). Conversely, growth was dampened by the fall in volumes and prices of recycled materials in the majority of countries where the Environmental Services Division is present (in particular Norway), and the fall in activity in the Transportation (termination of Stockholm and Warsaw contracts) and Water (completion of work on the Brussels contract) Divisions.

United States

The fall of 2.8% at constant exchange rates was marked by the slump in activities in the Environmental Services Division due to the economic context (decrease in volumes across all businesses, partially offset by price increases). Activity in the Energy Services Division was penalized by the negative impact of the fall in the price of gas. Growth in the other sectors was achieved due to new contracts in the Transportation Division, the good resistance of construction activities and the start-up of the Milwaukee water-treatment contract, as well as increasing activity in Indianapolis in the Water Division.

Oceania

The slump of 8.6% at constant exchange rates was due to a fall in activities in the Environmental Services Division in Australia (mainly present in the services and industrial waste sectors) and the completion of construction work on the Gold Coast desalination plant in the Water Division.

Asia

The growth of 11.7% at constant exchange rates in Asia was mainly realized by the Water Division, resulting from recent developments in China, and, to a lesser extent, by the Transportation and Energy Services Divisions with the start-up of new contracts, mainly in China and Korea (new subway line in Seoul in the Transportation Division).

Rest of the world (including the Middle-East)

The growth of 1.8% at constant exchange rates was mainly due to a growth in construction activities in the Water Division in the Middle-East and the development of Proactiva in South America (in particular the new concession contract in the Water Division in Guayaquil).



84



Back to Contents


Our Energy Services division generated revenue of €6.1 billion in 2006,Operating income

Operating income for the year ended December 31, 2009 was €2,020.1 million, compared to €1,960.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing an increase of 12% over 2005,3.0% at current exchange rates (6.1% at constant exchange rates). This increase was realized despite a decline in both adjusted operating cash flow and adjusted operating income, primarily as a result of the fact that significant goodwill impairment charges were recorded in the Environmental Services Division in 2008.

The principal factors that impacted the change in operating income from the year ended December 31, 2008 to the year ended December 31, 2009 were the following:

the change in adjusted operating cash flow, which 10% was organic growth. The full-yearis discussed below under “—Adjusted Operating Cash Flow.”,

the €35 million impairment of operating financial assets in Italy in the Environmental Services Division in 2009, following a review of the business plan incorporating the expected outcome of contractual negotiations still in progress as of December 31, 2009,

net charges to operating provisions in 2009 (compared to a net reversal/release of provisions in 2008), primarily encompassing asset risks, operating risks and litigation risks on certain contracts, as well as fair value adjustments on derivatives used to hedge the prices of raw materials,

impairment losses of €405.6 million recorded in 2008 in respect of goodwill and intangible assets of Veolia Environmental Services Germany,

the negative impact of the risedecrease in energy prices was €260discount rates on site rehabilitation provisions of €56 million of which €226 million was realized during the first nine months of 2006.  The fourth quarter represented a new heating season, during which prices stabilized or declinedin 2009, compared to a reversal of €21 million in 2008, in the first three quarters, although our EnergyEnvironmental Services business continuedDivision,

capital gains on disposals of €213.6 million in 2009 (including €99.0 million on the sale of Veolia Propreté Nettoyage et Multi-Services in the Environmental Services Division) compared to grow during this period.  Excluding the full year price effect, organic revenue growth was 7.2%.€114.1 million in 2008.

The business was subjectNet charges to contrasting weather conditions over the course of 2006.  While the beginning ofoperating depreciation and amortization increased from €1,663.9 million for the year had experienced more harsh temperatures than the average, the end ofended December 31, 2008 to €1,790.1 million for the year on the contrary, was warmer than the seasonal standards.

InFrance, organic growth of 8.2% resulted primarily from the increase in energy prices in the first quarter of the year, the start-upended December 31, 2009, as a result of new contracts and recent acquisitions. Net charges to operating provisions totaled €23.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to a reversal of €119.9 for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Cost of sales totaled €28,786.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 (83.3% of total revenue), compared to €30,013.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 (83.9% of total revenue). Selling costs and general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2009 totaled €602.6 million and €3,338.1 million respectively, compared to €621.4 million and €3,218.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Selling costs and general and administrative expenses represented 11.4% of revenue in 2009, compared to 10.7% in 2008. The modest increase in selling costs and general and adminisitrative expenses relates primarily to an upturnincrease in insurance costs and new IT systems.

Overall, industrial and financial capital gains totaled €213.6 million in 2009 compared to €114.1 million in 2008. We also recorded capital gains in 2008 on the sale of Clemessy and Crystal and in 2009 on the sale of the US incineration activities (Montenay International) in the engineering business.

Outside France, revenue growth totaled 17.0% of which12.6% was organic growth. It was primarily driven by the full effect of the Lodz contract (Poland), favorable pricing in Central Europe as well as acquisitions in ItalyEnvironmental Services Division and Brazil.

Transportation


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenues within the transportation division in 2005 and 2006:


2006

(in € millions)

2005

(in € millions)

% change 2006/2005

of which organic growth

of which external growth

of which currency fluctuation

4,951.5

4,223.9

17.2%

4.7%

12.9%

(0.4)%


InFrance,revenue growth was 12.7%, driven by the contribution of SNCM (2006 revenue contribution of approximately €200 million). The end of the Toulouse contract was offset by the positive impact of new contractsFreight activities in the field of urbanTransportation Division, which are recorded under income from discontinued operations, and intercity transit systems, and by the good performance of other business lines.

Outside France, revenue advanced by 20.4% of which 7.6% was organic growth. External growth was mainly due to acquisitions madethus are not included in the United States (ATC and Shuttleport) and in Norway (Helgelandske).operating income.

Revenue by geographical region


The following table shows a breakdown of our revenue by geographical region:


(€ millions, except %)

2006

2005

% change 2006/2005

France

13,403.0

12,439.2

7.7%

United Kingdom

2,186.8

1,727.1

26.6%

Germany

1,992.9

1,817.3

9.7%

Other European countries

5,317.9

4,708.6

12.9%

United States

2,650.3

2,183.3

21.4%

Oceania

931.4

878.0

6.1%

Asia

770.9

597.3

29.1%

Rest of the world

1,367.2

1,219.6

12.1%

Revenue

28,620.4

25,570.4

11.9%




85



Back to Contents


FranceAdjusted operating cash flow

In France revenue growthAdjusted operating cash flow was €3,955.8 million in 2009, compared with €4 105.4 million in 2008, a decline of 7.7%3.6% at current exchange rates and 1.7% at constant exchange rates. The limited decline in 2006 was driven by Veolia Energie asadjusted operating cash flow from 2008 to 2009, in a result of rising energy prices (an impact of 5.5%difficult economic climate, demonstrates the Group’s ability to adapt its cost structure to a drop in volumes and prices. The decline in adjusted operating cash flow resulted primarily from lower results in the revenuesEnvironmental Services Division (volumes, prices of Veolia Energie France),recycled materials sold). For the Group, this contraction was largely offset by Veolia Eau as a resultmajor effort to reduce costs which led to total savings in excess of continued strong growth€380 million compared to prior year costs on the same projects, and by the greater resilience of our other business activities to the business environment. The total cost savings included €126 mil lion realized pursuant to a supplementary cost reduction program in the engineering and construction sectors as well as continued solid results of the distribution business, by Veolia PropretéEnvironmental Services Division due to the combined effectslowdown of the increased efficiencyeconomy, and €255 million pursuant to the Group’s overall Efficiency Plan.

In this way, the Group successfully maintained its adjusted operating cash flow margin (equal to adjusted operating cash flow as a percentage of incineration plantsrevenues) between 2008 and 2009 at 11.5%, despite the difficult economic environment.

The total negative exchange rate impact on adjusted operating cash flow of €78.4 million was primarily due to the depreciation of the pound sterling in the amount of €44.1 million, mainly in the Water and Environmental Services Divisions, and the increasedepreciation of Central European currencies in tonnagethe amount of solid waste collected€33.1 million, mainly in the Energy Services Division. These and treated under high value-added service contracts andother downward movements in currencies were partially offset by the acquisitionappreciation of SNCM by Veolia Transport.

United Kingdom

The strong growth of 26.6%the U.S. dollar in the United Kingdomamount of €19.1 million, mainly in 2006 resulted from the acquisition of Cleanaway UK (three month effect), the full impact of the acquisition of Shanks in 2005 by the Environmental Services division, Veolia Énergie due to commercial development and an increase in energy prices, and the impact of five-year tariff reviews at Veolia Eau in 2005.Division.

Germany

Growth in Germany was 9.7% in 2006, largely due to new contracts, particularly the contract between Braunschweig and Veolia Eau for a wastewater plant and rail transport contracts (Nordharz-Netz and Marschbahn).  

Other European countries

The 12.9% growth in revenues in 2006 was due to full-year effect of the Lodz contract in Poland and to the impact of prices in the Energy Division, as well as new contracts and small acquisitions in our other sectors.

United States

Growth in the United States, 21.4% overall in 2006, was particularly significant in Veolia Propreté’s business and in Veolia Transport due to the impact of recent developments, including the acquisitions of ATC and Shuttleport, and the signing of new contracts.  

Oceania

Growth of 6.1% in the Oceania region in 2006 was due to the signing of new contracts in 2005 within Veolia Propreté and sustained activity within Veolia Transport.

Asia

Growth in Asia was 29.1% in 2006, which was due to recent developments in Veolia Eau (contracts in China and acquisitions in Japan) and to the start of new contracts for Veolia Propreté.

Rest of the world

Growth in the rest of the world was 12.1% in 2006, marked by the continued growth of Veolia Eau in North Africa and the Middle East.

Operating Income


Overview


Our operating income increased by 12.7%, from €1,892.9 million in 2005 to €2,132.9 million in 2006. The following table shows a breakdown of ourbreaks down adjusted operating incomecash flow by division:Division, at both current and constant exchange rates:

(in € millions, except %)

2006

2005

% change

Adjusted operating cash flow

Year ended
December 31,
2009

Year ended
December 31,
2008

Change

Current
exchange
rates

Constant
exchange
rates

Water

1,160.6

1,002.3

15.8%

1,836.6

1,821.3

0.8%

2.6%

Environmental Services

648.3

543.6

19.3%

1,194.1

1,331.4

-10.3%

-8.8%

Energy Services

377.7

315.3

19.8%

740.1

758.8

-2.5%

0.8%

Transportation

13.6

116.8

(88.3)%

327.0

287.4

13.8%

14.7%

Holding companies

(67.3)

(85.1)

20.9%

(142.0)

(93.5)

  

Total

2,132.9

1,892.9

12.7%

Total at constant 2005 exchange rate

2,126.8

1,892.9

12.4%

Adjusted operating cash flow

3,955.8

4,105.4

-3.6%

 

Adjusted operating cash flow at 2008 exchange rates

4,034.2

4,105.4

 

-1.7%




86



Back to Contents


As discussed above under “Presentation of Information in this Section – Non-GAAP Measures,” we use adjusted operating income, in addition to operating income, to evaluate our results of operations and otherwise as a management tool.  The following table shows a breakdownreconciliation of our adjusted operating cash flow to our operating income by division:Division in 2009 and 2008:

(in € millions, except %)

2006

2005

% change

 

Adjustments

Operating
Income

Year ended December 31, 2009
(€ million)

Adjusted
Operating
Cash
Flow

Net
(charges)/reversals
to operational
provisions

Net
depreciation
and
amortization
charges

Replacement
costs

Goodwill
Impairment

Net gains
on
divestitures (*)

Others
(**)

Water

1,163.4

997.1

16.7%

1,836.6

9.5

(498.0)

(245.7)

-

25.1

36.8

1,164.3

Environmental Services

648.3

553.6

17.1%

1,194.1

(54.2)

(807.2)

-

-

123.8

(2.7)

453.8

Energy Services

377.7

321.2

17.6%

740.1

(22.8)

(229.6)

(115.2)

(1.0)

43.5

0.5

415.5

Transportation

100.1

116.8

(14.3)%

327.0

52.1

(242.4)

-

(5.5)

21.2

0.5

152.9

Holding companies

(67.3)

(85.1)

20.9%

(142.0)

(8.3)

(12.9)

-

-

-

(3.2)

(166.4)

Total

2,222.2

1,903.6

16.7%

3,955.8

(23.7)

(1,790.1)

(360.9)

(6.5)

213.6

31.9

2,020.1

Total at constant 2005 exchange rate

2,216.1

1,903.6

16.4%


(*):

Primarily net gains on sale of Veolia Propreté Nettoyage et Multiservices for €99 milllions in the Environmental Services Division.

(**):

Primarily fair value adjustment on derivatives in the Water Division.


(*):

Primarily net gains on sale of Veolia Propreté Nettoyage et Multiservices for €99 milllions in the Environmental Services Division.

(**):

Primarily fair value adjustment on derivatives in the Water Division.


  

Adjustments

Operating
Income

Year ended December 31, 2008
(€ million)

Adjusted
Operating
Cash
Flow

Net
(charges)/reversals
to operational
provisions

Net
depreciation
and
amortization
charges

Replacement
costs

Goodwill
Impairment
(*)

Net gains on
divestitures

Others
(**)

Water

1,821.3

51.4

(468.3)

(263.6)

2.3

67.5

(12.1)

1,198.5

Environmental Services

1,331.4

(14.6)

(723.5)

-

(343.0)

16.3

(1.4)

265.2

Energy Services

758.8

13.2

(222.5)

(126.7)

5.0

11.6

(5.0)

434.4

Transportation

287.4

71.1

(238.3)

-

33.5

18.6

(1.8)

170.5

Holding companies

(93.5)

(1.2)

(11.3)

-

-

0.1

(1.9)

(107.8)

Total

4,105.4

119.9

(1,663.9)

(390.3)

(302.2)

114.1

(22.2)

1,960.8


(*)

Primarily goodwill impairment for German activities in the Environmental Services Division in 2008.

(**):

Primarily fair value adjustment on derivatives in the Water Division.



The following tables provideFor a reconciliationdiscussion of adjusted operating income to operating income for 2005cash flow by Division, see “—Adjusted Operating Cash Flow, Adjusted Operating Income and 2006:

2006

Total Operating Income

Adjustments

Adjusted

Operating Income

(€ millions)

 Impairment

Other

Water

1,160.6

2.8

-

1,163.4

Environmental Services

648.3

-

-

648.3

Energy Services

377.7

-

-

377.7

Transportation

13.6

86.5

-

100.1

Holding companies

(67.3)

-

-

(67.3)

Total

2,132.9

89.3

-

2,222.2



2005

Total operating income

Adjustments

Adjusted operating income

(€ millions)

 Impairment

Other

Water

1,002.3

(5.2)

-

997.1

Environmental Services

543.6

10.0

-

553.6

Energy Services

315.3

4.7

1.2

321.2

Transportation

116.8

-

-

116.8

Holding companies

(85.1)

-

-

(85.1)

Total

1,892.9

9.5

1.2

1,903.6


Operating income grewIncome by 12.7% in 2006 compared to 2005, or by 12.4% at constant exchange rates. Adjusted operating income grew by 16.7%, or by 16.4% at constant exchange rates.  The increases reflect primarily growth in our revenues and overall business and, in the case of adjusted operating income, an increase in margins resulting from the factors described in the division-by-division analysis below, as well as the continued benefits of our “Veolia Environnement 2005” efficiency plan, which resulted in selling, general and administrative expenses declining from 11.3% of revenues in 2005 to 10.9% of revenues in 2006.  Restructuring costs increased marginally in 2006 compared to 2005, while capital gains on asset sales decreased marginally.

Operating income in 2006 represented 7.5% of revenues compared to 7.4% in 2005.  Adjusted operating income represented 7.8% of revenues in 2006 and 7.4% in 2005.  In 2006, the only adjustments between operating income and adjusted operating income were impairment charges, primarily resulting from difficulties with a German contract in the Transport division (as discussed below).  In 2005, our impairment charges related to Environmental Services activities in Israel and Stérience in the Energy Services division.  We also recorded negative goodwill in the Water division.  Division.”



87



Back to Contents


WaterAdjusted Operating Income


Operating income from the Water division totaled €1,160.6 million in 2006, a 15.8% increase from €1,002.3 million recorded in 2005. Adjusted operating income grew by 16.7%, or by 16.3%was €1,932.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €2,275.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing a decline of 15.1% (-12.4% at constant exchange rates.

In France, the distribution and waterwork businesses performed well, boosting operating income, which also benefited from the continuing implementation of the program to improve operating performance.

Outside France, we recorded an increaserates). Changes in operating income that resulted from developments of the Stadtwerke in Braunschweig (including a positive adjustment to fair market value of an electricity supply contract), and from the beginning of new contracts in China and the impact of BOT contracts in Brussels and The Hague.  In addition, the effect of contractual price increases, including in the United Kingdom, Central Europe, Romania and Morocco, had a positive impact onadjusted operating income. Finally, engineering and technology solutions took another step toward recovery.income break down as follows:

 

Operating income

Adjusted operating income

 

Year ended December 31, 2009

Year ended December 31, 2008

% change

% change at constant exchange rates

Year ended December 31, 2009

Year ended December 31, 2008

% change

% change at constant exchange rates

Water

1,164.3

1,198.5

-2.9

-0.3

1,164.3

1,196.2

-2.7

-0.1

Environmental Services

453.8

265.2

71.1

75.5

359.8

620.2

-42.0

-40.1

Energy Services

415.5

434.4

-4.4

-0.3

416.4

429.4

-3.0

1.0

Transportation

152.9

170.5

-10.3

-9.8

158.3

137.0

15.6

16.2

Holding companies

(166.4)

(107.8)

  

(166.4)

(107.8)

  

Total

2,020.1

1,960.8

3.0

6.1

1,932.4

2,275.0

-15.1

-12.4

Total at 2008 exchange rates

2,080.7

1,960.8

  

1,993.0

2,275.0

  


The ratiofollowing table shows a reconciliation of our adjusted operating income to revenue from ordinary activities increased by 0.6 points, from 10.9% in 2005 to 11.5% in 2006.  The ratio ofour operating income to revenue from ordinary activities increased from 11.0%by Division in 2005 to 11.5% in 2006.

Environmental Services


Operating income from the Environmental Services division increased by 19.3%, from €543.6 million in 2005 to €648.3 million in 2006.

In France, operating income increased as a result of an increase in volume, primarily in the incineration sector2009 and in the landfill business.2008:

Year ended December 31, 2009

 

Adjustments

 

(€ million)

Adjusted

Impairment losses

Other

Total

Water

1,164.3

-

-

1,164.3

Environmental Services

359.8

-

94.0*

453.8

Energy Services

416.4

(0.9)

-

415.5

Transportation

158.3

(5.4)

-

152.9

Holding companies

(166.4)

-

-

(166.4)

Total

1,932.4

(6.3)

94.0

2,020.1


*

Represents primarily capital gains realized on the disposal of Veolia Propreté Nettoyage et Multi-Services.

Outside France, we recorded an increase in operating income, which was especially strong in the UK market due to the integration of Cleanaway United Kingdom in the fourth quarter of 2006 and the strong performance of integrated waste management contracts.  In the United States, the operating margin noticeably increased in the industrial services that are experiencing strong growth and in the solid waste activities due to increased prices.

The ratio of adjusted operating income to revenue increased from 8.2% in 2005 to 8.7% in 2006.  The ratio of operating income to revenue from ordinary activities increased from 8.1% in 2005 to 8.7% in 2006.

Energy Services


Operating income from the Energy Services division increased by 19.8%, from €315.3 million in 2005 to €377.7 million in 2006. At constant exchange rates adjusted operating income grew by 16.2%.

In France, profitability benefited from improvements in construction activities (both the level of activity and better efficiency). Given the overall balanced nature of the contract portfolio, the rise in energy prices had only a slight effect on profitability. As in 2005, rising gas prices caused the selling prices of electricity produced through co-generation to reach their ceiling. This phenomenon had limited effect, and the opportunity loss was offset by an upturn in energy management margins on other contracts and by the sale of surplus greenhouse gas emission rights generated by activities.

In the rest of Europe, we recorded a strong rise in operating income in Central European countries that resulted in particular from prices and a favorable climate in the Czech Republic and Poland and from the commencement of new contracts, such as the Lodz contract. A decrease in profit margin recorded in various countries following the increase in gas prices was more than offset by the sale of surplus greenhouse gas emission rights generated by activities.  

Given these items, the ratio of adjusted operating income to revenue increased, from 5.9% in 2005 to 6.2% in 2006.   The ratio of operating income to revenue from ordinary activities increased from 5.8% in 2005 to 6.2% in 2006.

Year ended December 31, 2008

 

Adjustments

 

(€ million)

Adjusted

Impairment losses

Other

Total

Water

1,196.2

-

2.3

1,198.5

Environmental Services

620.2

(343.0)**

(12.0)

265.2

Energy Services

429.4

-

5.0

434.4

Transportation

137.0

(37.7)

71.2***

170.5

Holding companies

(107.8)

-

 

(107.8)

Total

2,275.0

(380.7)

66.5

1,960.8


**

Represents primarily impairment charges relating to Veolia Environmental Services Germany.

***

Represents primarily badwill recorded in the income statement related to the purchase of minority interests in SNCM.



88



Back to Contents


TransportationAdjusted Operating Cash Flow, Adjusted Operating Income and Operating Income - Divisions


Water

The Water Division reported adjusted operating cash flow of €1,836.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €1,821.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing an increase of 2.6% at constant exchange rates (0.8% at current exchange rates). The adjusted operating cash flow margin increased from 14.5% in 2008 to 14.6% in 2009, reflecting an increase in the margin on operating activities and a decrease in the margin on construction activities.

In France, adjusted operating cash flow was affected by the decrease in volumes compared to 2008 and the slowdown in construction work associated with the current economic environment; it nonetheless benefited from further productivity gains and a positive indexing effect.

Outside France, the increase in Adjusted operating cash flow was significant, particularly in Asia thanks to tight control over overhead and development costs. In Europe the good resistance of activities offset the negative foreign exchange impact (particularly in the United Kingdom), despite a decrease in volumes delivered in 2009 and the one-off positive impact of the provisional acceptance of the Brussels plant in 2008. The Africa/Middle-East region reported an increase in Adjusted operating cash flow, mainly due to an increase in volumes and prices.

Finally, Veolia Water Solutions Technologies reported a decrease in Adjusted operating cash flow, due to a slowdown in business.

The Efficiency Plan had a positive impact on adjusted operating cash flow of €87 million in 2009.

Operating income fromdeclined modestly to €1,164.3 million for the Transportation division was €13.6 million in 2006,year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €116.8€1,198.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, although it was essentially stable at constant exchange rates. Adjusted operating income was stable at constant exchange rates, but decreased by 2.7% at current exchange rates, to €1,164.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €1,196.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.

The Water Division’s operating income was affected by an increase in 2005. Dueoperating depreciation and amortization charges between 2008 and 2009 and a decrease in net gains on disposals of industrial and financial assets. Net reversals to persistent difficulties relatingoperating provisions totaled €9.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €51.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, primarily as a contract, Veolia Transport carried outresult of fair value adjustments in respect of hedging derivatives. Net charges to depreciation and amortization totaled €498.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €468.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Overall, the operating income margin (operating income as a reviewpercentage of its activities in Germanyrevenue) and accounted for losses of €86.5 million, which were excluded from adjusted operating income.  Excluding this item,the adjusted operating income decreased by 14.3% (14.5%margin (adjusted operating income as a percentage of revenue) fell from 9.5% in 2008 to 9.3% in 2009.

Environmental Services

The Environmental Services Division reported adjusted operating cash flow of €1,194.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €1,331.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing a decrease of 10.3% (or a decrease of 8.8% at constant exchange rates).

The fall in waste volumes and primarily industrial and hazardous waste volumes and the slump in the price of recycled materials (paper and non-ferrous metal) compared to €100.1 million.2008, had a major impact on operating performance in this sector in all major countries (France, United Kingdom, Germany, Australia and the United States). The positive impact of the cost-cutting plan (€126 million in 2009) and the Efficiency Plan (€72 million) and the favorable impact of the fall in fuel prices progressively enabled a turnaround in trends which became positive at the year-end as economic conditions stabilized.

Operating income in Environmental Services was €453.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €265.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing an increase of 71.1% (+75.5% at constant exchange rates). This balance includes the capital gain realized on the sale of Veolia Propreté Nettoyage et Multi-Services of €99 million in 2009, compared to substantial impairment losses recognized in Germany (€405.6 million) in 2008.



89



Back to Contents


Adjusted operating income was €359.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 (excluding the capital gain realized on the sale of Veolia Propreté Nettoyage et Multi-Services), compared to €620.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 (excluding the substantial impairment losses in Germany), representing a decrease of 42% (-40.1% at constant exchange rates).

Adjusted operating income of the Environmental Services Division for the year ended December 31, 2009 includes a €35 million impairment of operating financial assets in Italy, following a review of the business plan incorporating the expected outcome of ongoing contractual negotiations. 2008 adjusted operating income included an impairment charge of €62.6 million on intangible assets recognized on the acquisition of Sulo.

The fall in adjusted operating income also includes a negative impact of €77 million compared to 2008, associated with the decrease in discount rates used as of December 31 each year to calculate site rehabilitation provisions. Net charges to operating provisions totaled €54.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €14.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Net charges to operating depreciation and amortization totaled €807.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €723.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.

The adjusted operating cash flow margin (adjusted operating cash flow as a percentage of revenues from continued operations) decreased from 13.4% in 2008 to 13.2% in 2009. The improvement in the adjusted operating cash flow margin rate in the fourth quarter of 2009 on the same period in 2008 was substantial, increasing from 11.8% in the 4th quarter of 2008 to 14.7% in the 4th quarter of 2009. The operating income margin (operating income as a percentage of revenue) increased from 2.7% in 2008 to 5.0% in 2009. However, the adjusted operating income margin (adjusted operating income as a percentage of revenue) fell from 6.2% in 2008 to 4.0% in 2009.

Energy Services

The Energy Services Division reported adjusted operating cash flow of €740.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €758.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing a decrease of 2.5% (increase of 0.8% at constant exchange rates).

The Division’s adjusted operating cash flow benefited from the increase in energy prices (coal and electricity) in Central European countries and the Baltic States. Sales of CO2 allowances contributed less than in 2008. Finally, the reduction in construction work impacted the performance of certain entities, particularly in Southern Europe.

In France, the profitability of the passengers transportation business improved, resulting mainly from interurban activities and services in Ile de France (the region that includes Paris), as well as the integration of SNCM.  

Outside France, solid performances were recorded in the Benelux countries and Australia.  Operating incomeadjusted operating cash flow was also affected by acquisitionsthe decrease in North America, particularly ATC and Shuttleport, and by a dilution profitsales of €18.7 million resulting from the EBRD’s acquisition of an interest in Central European activities.

Because ofCO2 allowances, the negative impact of rising energy prices and the ratioslowdown in the industrial services business, despite the effects of the Efficiency Plan.

The Efficiency Plan had a positive impact of €56 million in 2009.

The adjusted operating cash flow margin increased from 10.2% in 2008 to 10.5% in 2009.

Operating income was €415.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €434.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing a decrease of 4.4% at current exchange rates (-0.3% at constant exchange rates).

Adjusted operating income was €416.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €429.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing a decrease of 3% at current exchange rates (increase of 1.0% at constant exchange rates).

Net charges to operating provisions totaled €22.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to a net reversal of €13.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Net charges to operating depreciation and amortization totaled €229.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €222.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Overall, both the operating income margin and the adjusted operating income margin increased from 5.8% in 2008 to revenue decreased5.9% in 2009.



90



Back to Contents


Transportation

The Transportation Division reported adjusted operating cash flow of €327.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €287.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing a rise of 13.8% (14.7% at constant exchange rates).

The increase in adjusted operating cash flow is attributable to the improved performance of operations previously generating insufficient profits as well as productivity gains, particularly in France, Northern Europe and North America, which offset the fall in airport and tourist activities.

The positive impact on adjusted operating cash flow, net of hedging arrangements, of the fall in fuel prices is estimated at approximately €22 million for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to the year ended December 31, 2008. The Efficiency Plan had a positive impact on adjusted operating cash flow of €40 million in 2009.

The adjusted operating cash flow margin increased from 2.8%5.0% in 20052008 to 2.0%5.6% in 2006.2009, whereas overall, the operating income margin fell from 2.9% in 2008 to 2.6% in 2009. The ratioadjusted operating income margin increased from 2.3% in 2008 to 2.7% in 2009.

Operating income for the Transportation Division was €152.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €170.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing a decrease of 10.3% (-9.8% at constant exchange rates). The decrease resulted in large part from the positive impact in 2008 of badwill recorded upon the purchase of minority interests in SNCM, which was only partially offset by goodwill impairment charges.

Adjusted operating income (which excludes the impact of badwill and goodwill impairment) was €158.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €137 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, representing an increase of 15.6% (+16.2% at constant exchange rates).

Net reversals of operating provisions totaled €52.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €71.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008. Net charges to operating depreciation and amortization totaled €242.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, compared to €238.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Unallocated operating income / (loss)

Unallocated operating loss (representing operating income or loss of of holding company activities) was €107.8 million in 2008 and €166.4 million in 2009. Adjusted operating loss of holding companies was identical to revenueoperating loss in both years. The adjusted operating cash flow of holding companies fell from ordinary activities declined from 2.8%negative €93.5 million in 2005the year ended December 31, 2008 to 0.3%negative €142.0 million in 2006.the year ended December 31, 2009.

The increase in costs for the year is mainly due to a rise in mutual insurance costs following an increase in the claims rate and the cost of transactions in progress at year-end and particularly the combination of Veolia Transport and Transdev.

Net Finance costs net


Finance costs, net, decreased from €710.7 million in 2005 to €701.0 million in 2006.  Finance costs, net represent the cost of gross financial fair value debt, including profit and loss on related interest rate and exchange rate hedging, less income on cash and cash equivalents. The following table shows a breakdown of our finance costs, net:

(€ million)

Year ended
December 31, 2009

Year ended
December 31, 2008

Income

96.1

202.2

Expenses

(880.4)

 (1,111.2)

Finance costs, net

(784.3)

(909.0)


(€ millions)

2006

2005

   

Income

82.8

63.3

Expense

(783.8)

(774.0)

Total finance costs, net

(701.0)

(710.7)


TheNet finance costs decreased whereas the average financial debt rose from €16,142 million in 2008 to €16,466 million in 2009. This decline in net finance costs was attributable to the reduction in the financing rate defined asfrom 5.61% in 2008 to 4.76% in 2009. The “financing rate” is equal to the ratio between the cost of net financial debt (equal to financefinancing costs, net, excluding fair value adjustments to non-qualifying for hedge instruments) to average net indebtedness (based on a quarterly weighted average), was stable at 5.07% in both 2005 and 2006.

This stability, which was maintained despite an increase in short-term euro interest rates, was due to the increase in the portion of fixed rate debt in our indebtedness and the maturity of certain high interest rate debt.  The €26 million redemption premium paid in 2005 in connection with the redemption of €1,150 million of convertible bonds wasinstruments that do not included in the 2005 financing rate, although the relatively low interest rate did affect the 2005 financing rate.

In addition, fair value adjustments on derivative instruments not qualifyingqualify for hedge accounting, totaled €6.4 million, compared to €10.1 million in 2005. These adjustments, which are calculated in accordance with IAS 39average monthly net financial debt for the period. See Item 5: “Liquidity and which depend on market conditions at the endCapital Resources – Net Financial Debt” for a discussion of the period, are highly volatile in nature.net financial debt.





8991



Back to Contents


This decrease by approximately 1% in the financing rate was primarily due to:

the decline in short-term rates for the floating-rate portion of debt (particularly Eonia, Euribor, Libor GBP and USD);

partially offset by the return on cash and cash equivalents (cash arising from a €2 billion bond issue on April 24, 2009) invested in short-term low risk instruments offering a return comparable to Eonia.

Other Financial Income and Expenses


(Expenses)

The following table shows a breakdown of our other financial income (expenses), as adjusted to take into account the retroactive application of IFRS 7, which we applied for the first time in 2007::


(€ millions)

2006

2005

(€ million)

Year ended
December 31, 2009

Year ended
December 31,2008

Net gains on loans and receivables

21.5

61.2

13.9

43.3

Net gains and losses on available-for-sale assets (including dividends)

9.7

6.5

8.0

9.3

Assets and liabilities at fair value through profit and loss

(21.6)

(6.1)

(22.9)

35.1

Unwinding of the discount on provisions

(15.9)

(17.3)

(83.0)

(73.3)

Foreign exchange gains and losses

(14.3)

14.3

(10.7)

(42.8)

Other income (expenses)

(13.4)

(30.5)

Other

(15.6)

(10.8)

Other financial income and expenses

(34.0)

28.1

(110.3)

(39.2)


Other financial expenses increased from €39.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 to €110.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. This was mainly due to a €29.4 million decrease in net financial incomegains on loans and expenses were positive €28.1receivables, and a €58 million negative difference in fair value adjustments on assets recorded at fair value through profit and loss, of which €60 million related to the indexation clauses in Water Division contracts. In addition, improved currency management resulted in a reduction in foreign exchange losses from €42.8 million in 2005 and negative €34.02008 to €10.7 million in 2006.  The decline in other financial income and expenses principally resulted from the impact of the foreign exchange gains and losses (negative impact of €28.6 million), the revaluation of embedded derivatives negative impact of €13.8 million) and provisions of €8.4 million in 2006 linked to guarantees issued by the subsidiaries of Veolia Propreté in Asia.

In 2006, the unwinding of discounts of long term provisions had a negative impact of €15.9 million, compared with a negative impact of €17.3 million in 2005.  The revaluation of embedded derivatives had a negative impact of €16.3 million in 2006, compared with a negative impact of €2.5 million in 2005.


2009.

Income Tax Expense


IncomeThe consolidated income tax expense totaled €409.6of the Group for the year ended December 31, 2009 was €242.2 million in 2006, consisting of €330.9 million in current income taxes and €78.7 million in deferred income taxes, compared to €462.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2008.

As a total expensepercentage of €422.4 million in 2005, consisting of €309.4 million in currentpre-tax net income taxes and a deferred income tax benefit of €113.0 million.

The decrease in tax expense in 2006 was duefrom continuing operations (adjusted to the restructuring ofeliminate our U.S. tax group, which generated a deferred tax credit of €86.2 million (included in “Other countries”share in the deferred tax expense in the notes to our consolidated financial statements).  Apart from this credit, an increase in our scope of consolidation and pre-tax income increased both the current and deferred tax expense.  

We have classified the non-adjusted U.S. credit as an adjustment item in calculating our adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent, as discussed below.  Excluding this item, income tax expenses increased from €422.4 million to €495.8 million, andassociates),, the effective tax rate was 33.34%21.5% for 2009, compared to 45.6% for 2008. The decline in this rate was mainly attributable to the inclusion in the 2008 effective tax rate of the impacts of unfavorable changes in tax legislation, asset impairments with no tax savings and the contribution of loss-making subsidiaries which have no prospects of recovery (inventory effect). In contrast, the 2009 tax rate includes the positive impacts arising from disposal gains taxed at low rates.

Share of Net Income of Associates


The share of net income offrom associates decreased from €6.5€19.4 million forin 2008 to €1.4 million in 2009, mainly due to the year ended December 31, 2005 to €6.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.  This near-stability reflects the first-time equity accountingdivestiture in 2009 of Compagnie Méridionale de Navigation (shares of which are held by the SNCM) whose results in 2006 were €5.1 million, as well as provisions of €7.4 million relating to project company shares in the Environmental Services sector in Asia, due to the client’s repudiation of the related agreements.


Transportation Division.

Net Income / (Loss) from Discontinued Operations


Net incomeThe net loss from discontinued operations totaled €42.8 million in 2009, compared to net income of €139.2 million in 2008. The 2009 net loss was €0.6 million formainly due to the year ended December 31, 2006, compared with €0.7 million for 2005.  Income relating to Southern Water was €52.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 (including €51.2 million of capital gains and losses arising from the disposal), compareddivestiture of Freight activities (Veolia Cargo) in the Transportation Division in December 2009 and the incineration business in the United States within the Environmental Services Division in August 2009. It also includes the net income or loss from activities in the United Kingdom in the Transportation Division and Renewable Energy activities in the Energy Services Division in the process of being sold at the year-end. In 2008, the net income mainly included the capital gain arising from the disposal of Clemessy and Crystal in the Energy Services Division for a net amount of €176.5 million, with a share attributable to €8.4 million for 2005.  The loss relating to the Danish Transportation business was €51.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 (of which €43.9 million was an asset impairment charge), compared to €7.7 million for 2005.non-controlling interests of €60 million.



9092



Back to Contents


Net income for the year attributable to minoritynon-controlling interests


Net income attributable to minoritynon-controlling interests for the year ended December 31, 2006 was €236.2€257.8 million in 2009, compared to €172.9€304.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. This line item reflected minority interests in the Water segment (€115.7 million),previous year. In 2008, this income included the Environmental Services segment (€18.6 million),capital gain realized on the divestiture of Clemessy and Crystal in the Energy Services segment (€87.1 million) and the Transportation segment (€14.7 million). The increase between 2005 and 2006 is mainly attributable to developments in international activitiesDivision of Dalkia in partnership with EDF, the Water segment in Germany (€19.3 million) and the Transportation segment with the consolidation of SNCM (€7.9 million).

Net income attributable to minority interests for the year ended December 31, 2005 was €172.9€60 million. This line item reflected minority interests in the Water segment (€83.1 million), the Environmental Services segment (€25.7 million), the Energy segment (€54.7 million) and the Transportation segment (€9.7 million).

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent


Net income for the year attributable to equity holders of the parent was €758.7totaled €584.1 million in 2006,2009, compared to €622.2€405.1 million in 2005.  The weighted average number of shares outstanding was 393.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 and 390.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. On this basis, net earnings per share attributable to the equity holders were €1.93 in 2006, compared to €1.59 in 2005 (in each case, without adjustment for our July 2007 capital increase).

As discussed under “—Presentation of Information in this Section – Non-GAAP Measures,” we use adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent as an important management tool.2008. Adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent was €762.0€538.1 million in 2006,2009, compared to €630.2€687.2 million in 2005.  The following table presents a reconciliation of adjusted net income2008.

After adjustment for the share dividend distribution in 2009, basic and diluted earnings per share attributable to equity holders of the parent were both €1.24 in 2009, compared to €0.88 (basic) and €0.87 (diluted) in 2008. Basic and diluted adjusted net income per share attributable to equity holders of the parent were both €1.14 in 2009, compared to €1.49 (basic) and €1.48 (diluted) in 2008. See Item 3, “Key Information – Selected Financial Data” for information on the weighted average number of shares outstanding in each period.

Adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent for 2005 and 2006.the year ended December 31, 2009 is determined as follows:

2006

(€ millions)

Net income

Adjustments

Adjusted
net income

Operating income

2,132.9

89.3

2,222.2

Finance costs, net

(701.0)

-

(701.0)

Other financial income and expenses

(34.0)

-

(34.0)

Income tax expense

(409.6)

(86.2)

(495.8)

Share of net income of associates

6.0

-

6.0

Net income from discontinued operations

0.6

(0.6)

-

Minority interests

(236.2)

0.8

(235.4)

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent

758.7

3.3

762.0



2005 adjusted

(€ millions)

Net income

Adjustments

Adjusted net income

Year ended December 31, 2009(€ million)

Adjusted Net Income

Adjustments

Net Income

Operating income

1,892.9

10.7

1,903.6

1,932.4

87.7(1)

2,020.1

Finance costs, net

(710.7)

-

(710.7)

Net finance costs

(784.3)

-

(784.3)

Other financial income and expenses

28.1

-

28.1

(110.3)

-

(110.3)

Income tax expense

(422.4)

-

(422.4)

(242.2)

-

(242.2)

Share of net income of associates

6.5

-

6.5

1.4

-

1.4

Net income from discontinued operations

0.7

(0.7)

-

-

(42.8)

(42.8)

Minority interests

(172.9)

(2.0)

(174.9)

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent

622.2

8.0

630.2

Non-controlling interests

(258.9)

1.1

(257.8)

Net income attributable to owners of the Company

538.1

46.0

584.1

(1)

Adjustments to operating income are described above under “Operating Income – Adjusted Operating Income”.

(1)

Adjustments to operating income are described above under “Operating Income – Adjusted Operating Income”.


In 2006,Adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the principal adjustment item (other thanparent for the adjustment to operating income, whichyear ended December 31, 2008 is discussed above) was the non-adjusted deferred tax credit relating to the tax restructuring of our U.S. operations, which is discussed above.  In 2005, the only significant adjustment item was the adjustment to operating income, which is discussed above.determined as follows:

Year ended December 31, 2008(€ million)

Adjusted Net Income

Adjustments

Net Income

Operating income

2,275.0

(314.2) (1)

1,960.8

Net finance costs

(909.0)

-

(909.0)

Other financial income and expenses

(39.2)

-

(39.2)

Income tax expense

(420.1)

(41.9) (2)

(462.0)

Share of net income of associates

19.4

-

19.4

Net income from discontinued operations

-

139.2

139.2

Non-controlling interests

(238.9)

(65.2) (3)

(304.1)

Net income attributable to owners of the Company

687.2

(282.1)

405.1

Published net income attributable to owners of the Company

658.6

(253.5)

405.1

(1)

 Adjustments to operating income are described above under “Operating Income – Adjusted Operating Income.

(2)

Impairment charge in respect of deferred tax assets in Germany in the Environmental Services Division following the review of the Veolia Propreté Germany business plan.

(3)

 Primarily the share attributable to non-controlling interests of €60 million arising from the disposal of Clemessy and Crystal in the Energy Services Division.




9193



Back to Contents


Year ended December 31, 2008 compared to year ended December 31, 2007

Revenue for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007

Overview

The following table shows a breakdown of our revenues in 2008 and 2007:

2008

(in € millions)

2007

(in € millions)

% change 2008/2007

Internal growth

External growth

Foreign Exchange
Impact

35,764.8

31,574.1

13.3%

9.6%

6.1%

-2.4%


Our consolidated revenue for the year ended December 31, 2008 amounted to €35,764.8 million compared to €31,574.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, an increase of 13.3% at current exchange rates and 15.7% at constant exchange rates. Internal growth was 9.6%, including internal growth of 13.4% recorded outside France.

External growth was 6.1%, particularly due to acquisitions by Veolia Propreté in Germany, Italy and France (total contribution of €828.6 million in 2008), by Veolia Energie in the United States (€303.5 million) and by Veolia Eau, primarily in the United Kingdom and Japan (total contribution of approximately €268.4 million). The contribution of acquisitions enabled us to accelerate our growth outside France, where revenue totaled €21,299.7 million or 59.6% of total revenue, compared to 57.1% in 2007.

The net negative impact of foreign exchange rates of €751.7 million mostly reflected the depreciation of the US dollar (negative €179.6 million) and the British pound (negative €422.5 million), partially offset by the appreciation of the Czech Koruna (€109.0 million).

The following table shows a breakdown of our revenues by Division in 2008 and 2007:

(In € millions, except for %)

2008

2007

% change 2008/2007

    

Water

12,557.9

10,927.4

14.9%

Environmental Services

9,972.5

9,057.2

10.1%

Energy Services

7,446.3

6,200.4

20.1%

Transportation

5,788.1

5,389.1

7.4%

Total revenue

35,764.8

31,574.1

13.3%

Total revenue at constant 2007 exchange rate

36,516.5

31,574.1

15.7%


Water

The following table shows a breakdown of our revenues within the Water Division in 2008 and 2007:

2008

(in € millions)

2007

(in € millions)

% change 2008/2007

Internal growth

External growth

Foreign
Exchange Impact

12,557.9

10,927.4

14.9%

13.4%

3.3%

-1.8%


In France internal growth amounted to 3.4% (excluding foreign construction subsidiaries and entities), as a result of price indexing, a wider service offering and growth in engineering work, which offset the approximately 1.9% drop in the volume of water distributed in 2008 as compared to 2007.



94



Back to Contents


Outside France and excluding Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies, revenue increased by 16.5% (12.3% on a constant consolidation scope and exchange rate basis). In Europe, growth of 13.2% (8.5% on a constant consolidation scope and exchange rate basis) reflected the acquisition of new non-regulated water operations in the UK, the completion of the Brussels plant and strong activity in Germany. Sustained activity was also experienced in the Africa/Middle East region, with an increase of almost 14.1% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates (15.2% at current scope and exchange rates) due primarily to the Oman Sur and Mauritanian contracts. In the Asia/Pacific region, strong growth of 23.4% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates (32.9% at current scope and exchange rates) was largely fueled by the start up of new municipal and industrial contracts in China (L anzhou, Haikou and Tianjin), by increased volumes and the extension of the Shenzhen concession and by engineering activities in Australia (Sydney desalination contract). In the United States, growth of 8.8% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates (4.5% at current scope and exchange rates) mainly reflected the start up of the Milwaukee contract and good engineering activity levels in Indianapolis.

Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies reported revenue of €2,524.9 million in 2008, up 36.3% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates (34.2% at current scope and exchange rates), due to municipal and industrial design and build projects, in particular in the Middle East.

Environmental Services

The following table shows a breakdown of our revenues within the Environmental Services (waste management) Division in 2008 and 2007:

2008

(in € millions)

2007

(in € millions)

% change 2008/2007

Internal growth

External growth

Foreign
Exchange Impact

9,972.5

9,057.2

10.1%

4.3%

10.3%

-4.5%


In France, revenue increased by 11.2% (3.8% at constant consolidation scope). External growth was attributable to the acquisition of Bartin Aero Recycling Group, finalized in February 2008. Internal growth was bolstered by the sustained level of non-hazardous household and industrial waste processing activities (both landfill and incineration). However the economic slowdown, first observed in the third quarter of 2008 and which accelerated in the fourth quarter, brought an abrupt end to trends observed during the first half of the year. This slowdown had a particularly significant impact on the sorting, recycling and trading businesses, due to the sharp decrease in the price of recyclable paper and metals, as well as activities with industrial customers (decrease in volumes of both hazardous and non-hazardous waste).

Outside France, all of the Division’s regions contributed to internal growth of 4.4% (9.4% at current consolidation scope and exchange rates), which slowed considerably during the fourth quarter as a result of economic trends in North America, the UK and above all in Germany, where volumes fell significantly. For the year as a whole, growth in North America (7.8% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates and 1.6% at current consolidation scope and rates) was sustained by price increases in the solid waste sector, which offset the decrease in volumes, and by the strong market for hazardous waste management and industrial services. In the UK, growth amounted to 8.6% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates (6.7% decrease at current consolidation scope and exchange rates), reflecting in particular the new contracts won. In Germany, revenue was down compared to 2 007 beginning in the third quarter (18.9% decline in the second half of 2008 at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates), following the loss of several contracts in the used packaging business (such as DSD) as well as lower volumes in industrial waste management. The recycling business was also strongly affected by the decrease in prices for recycled materials. In Asia, the development of recently won contracts was a strong factor in internal growth of 22.0% (25% at current consolidation scope and exchange rates). Finally, growth of 14.4% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates (11.3% at current consolidation scope and exchange rates) in the Pacific region was attributable to growth in the waste collection and processing sector and industrial services.

External growth of 10.3% essentially reflected the acquisition of Veolia Propreté Germany (formerly SULO), which contributed revenue of €522.3 million in the first half of 2008 (SULO was consolidated as from July 2, 2007), of VSA Tecnitalia (formerly TMT) in Italy, which contributed revenue of €59.7 million in 2008, and of Bartin Aero Recycling Group in France (consolidated with effect from February 2008), which contributed revenue of €246.6 million in 2008.



95



Back to Contents


Energy Services

The following table shows a breakdown of our revenues within the Energy Services Division in 2008 and 2007:

2008

(in € millions)

2007

(in € millions)

% change 2008/2007

Internal growth

External growth

Foreign Exchange
Impact

7,446.3

6,200.4

20.1%

12.0%

8.7%

-0.6%


Total revenue increased by 20.1% as a result in particular of the increase in energy prices (impact of €473 million) and the acquisition of Thermal North America Inc. (TNAI) in the United States at the end of 2007.

In France, revenue increased 12.7% based on a constant consolidation scope (13.2% at current consolidation scope) as a result of the increased price of energy, more favorable weather conditions than in 2007 (in particular in the fourth quarter of 2008) and the good commercial development of dedicated subsidiaries.

Outside France, revenue grew by 28.2% (11.1% at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates), as a result of both the increase in energy prices and commercial development in Europe as a whole, against the backdrop of stable weather conditions throughout Central Europe in comparison with 2007.

External growth of 8.7% mainly reflected the €303 million contribution of the TNAI acquisition in the United States at the end of 2007, as well as, to a lesser extent, the acquisition of Praterm in Poland and of smaller companies in Central and Southern Europe.

Transportation

The following table shows a breakdown of our revenues within the Transportation Division in 2008 and 2007:

2008

(in € millions)

2007

(in € millions)

% change 2008/2007

Internal growth

External growth

Foreign Exchange
Impact

5,788.1

5,389.1

7.4%

7.7%

1.8%

-2.1%


Revenue increased by 7.1% in France based on a constant consolidation scope (7.8% at current consolidation scope), underpinned by the Division’s continuing development in urban and intercity transport.

Outside France, revenue increased by 8.5% (at constant consolidation scope and exchange rates), due to the full effect of the new contracts signed in North America and Germany and of strong growth in Australia.

External growth of 1.8% principally reflected the acquisition of People Travel Group in Sweden in 2007.



96



Back to Contents


Revenue by geographical region

The following table shows a breakdown of our revenue by geographical region and Operating segment (Division):

December 31, 2008

(in € million)

France

Germany

United
Kingdom

Other
European
countries

United
States

Oceania

Asia

Middle
East

Rest
of the
world

Total

Water

4,883.5

1,376.7

671.5

1,679.7

612.2

358.5

976.9

862.1

1,136.8

12,557.9

Environmental Services

3,693.9

1,108.8

1,667.7

1,195.6

1,178.8

479.3

226.7

79.9

341.8

9,972.5

Energy Services

3,625.1

57.8

487.9

2,595.1

322.0

53.4

56.0

60.6

188.4

7,446.3

Transportation

2,262.5

514.0

49.8

1,559.1

760.4

546.5

10.3

24.2

61.3

5,788.1

Revenue

14,465,0

3,057.3

2,876.9

7,029.5

2,873.4

1,437.7

1,269.9

1,026.8

1,728.3

35,764.8


December 31, 2007

(in € million)

France

Germany

United
Kingdom

Other
European
countries

United
States

Oceania

Asia

Middle
East

Rest
of the
world

Total

Water

4,927.2

1,276.9

573.4

1,413.0

539.3

299.8

732.8

313.9

851.1

10,927.4

Environmental Services

3,332.0

787.9

1,776.0

993.5

1,158.7

430.7

181.4

63.3

333.7

9,057.2

Energy Services

3,183.3

56.5

473.5

2,159.9

15.3

69.1

42.3

52.5

148

6,200.4

Transportation

2,104.8

480.7

43.1

1,462.2

710.0

508.6

4.5

17.3

57.9

5,389.1

Revenue

13,547.3

2,602.0

2,866.0

6,028.6

2,423.3

1,308.2

961.0

447.0

1,390.7

31,574.1


Change

(in € million)

France

Germany

United
Kingdom

Other
European
countries

United
States

Oceania

Asia

Middle
East

Rest
of the
world

Total

Water

-43.7

99.8

98.1

266.7

72.9

58.7

244.1

548.2

285.7

1,630.5

Environmental Services

361.9

320.9

-108.3

202.1

20.1

48.6

45.3

16.6

8.1

915.3

Energy Services

441.8

1.3

14.4

435.2

306.7

-15.7

13.7

8.1

40.4

1,245.9

Transportation

157.7

33.3

6.7

96.9

50.4

37.9

5.8

6.9

3.4

399.0

Revenue

917.7

455.3

10.9

1,000.9

450.1

129.5

308.9

579.8

337.6

4,190.7

Variance (%)

6.8%

17.5%

0.4%

16.6%

18.6%

9.9%

32.1%

129.7%

24.3%

13.3%

Variance at constant exchange rate (%)

6.8%

17.5%

15.1%

15.3%

26.2%

18.2%

37.1%

135.1%

27.6%

15.7%




97



Back to Contents


France

Revenue increased by 6.8% in France as a result of the impact of energy prices in the Energy Services Division, continued vigorous growth in engineering and construction work in the Water Division and sustained growth in inter-city activities (in particular in the Greater Paris region) in the Transportation Division. Growth reported by Veolia Propreté was primarily related to the acquisition of Bartin in February 2008.

Germany

The 17.5% increase in revenue in Germany was mainly attributable to the acquisition of Veolia Propreté Germany, an increase in Braunschweig contract sales (Veolia Eau) and internal growth in rail operations (Veolia Transport).

United Kingdom

Revenue increased by 15.1% in the United Kingdom, on a constant exchange rate basis, due in part to new integrated contracts in the Environmental Services Division, commercial development and focused acquisitions in Veolia Energy Services and the acquisition of Thames Water unregulated water operations by Veolia Eau. The impact of the decline of the pound offset this growth in revenues from operations.

Other European countries

The 15.3% increase in revenue at constant exchange rates in Other European countries was primarily due to the acquisition of Praterm, the development of Veolia Energy Services activities in Southern and Northern Europe, the acquisition of VES Tecnitalia by Veolia Propreté in Italy, the growth of activities in Central Europe and the completion of work at the Brussels plant by Veolia Eau.

United States

The 26.2% increase in revenue at constant exchange rates in the United States was due to marked growth across all Veolia Propreté businesses, the full-year effect of new contracts within Veolia Transport, the impact of the acquisition of Thermal North America Inc. by Veolia Energie at the end of 2007, the start-up of the Milwaukee contract and sustained engineering activities in Indianapolis in the Water Division.

Oceania

The 18.2% increase in revenues at constant exchange rates in Oceania was boosted by Veolia Eau contracts in Australia (desalination plant in Sydney), Veolia Propreté activities (particularly the Woodlawn contract) and increased revenue from the Veolia Transport Melbourne contract.

Asia

The 37.1% increase in revenue on a constant exchange rate basis in Asia resulted from recent developments with the Water Division (contracts wins in China and acquisitions in Japan) and, to a lesser extent, the start-up of new contracts for Veolia Propreté and Veolia Energie.

Rest of the world

Revenue increased by 53.7% at constant exchange rates in the rest of the world as a result of sustained growth recorded by Veolia Eau in Africa and the Middle East (contract in Mauritania and Oman Sur BOT contract).



98



Back to Contents


Operating Income

The Group’s operating income decreased by 20.3%, from €2,461.1 million in 2007 to €1,960.8 million in 2008. The change reflected primarily the impact of impairment charges, as well as increased depreciation and amortization relating to new contracts and acquisitions.

At the Group level, operating income in 2008 benefited from the development of new business activities, recent acquisitions, strong performance in the Energy Services Division and the favorable impact of our productivity plan. These benefits were offset, however, by the following negative impacts:

foreign exchange movements (negative impact of €72.0 million), reflecting in particular the appreciation of the euro against the other principal currencies where the Group operates;

the deterioration in operating performance of the Environmental Services Division, with a particularly unfavorable business climate beginning in the third quarter (prices and volume), despite the restructuring actions taken in Germany during the second half of the year (new management team, shutdown of two regional offices and restructuring plan);

the increase in development costs and other overheads, primarily in Asia; and

cost increases, particularly for fuel, not passed on to customers.

In addition to these effects, operating income reflects impairment losses recognized by Veolia Propreté Germany of €405.6 million (including €343 million for goodwill) and by the Transportation Division in Northern Europe (€38 million), which were partially offset by a badwill (€70 million) recorded upon the purchase of minority interests in SNCM in the Transportation Division.

Depreciation and amortization charges increased as a result of new contracts and recent acquisitions, with net operating depreciation and amortization, net of operating provisions, increasing from a charge of €1,427.4 million in 2007 to a charge of €1,544.0 million in 2008.

Overall the operating margin (operating income as a percentage of revenues) was 7.8% in 2007 compared to 5.5% in 2008 and adjusted operating income margin (adjusted operating income as a percentage of revenues) fell from 7.7% in 2007 to 6.4% in 2008.

Cost of sales in 2008 represented 83.9% of revenues compared to 81.4% in 2007, reflecting the cost increases described above. Selling, general and administrative costs remained essentially stable as a percentage of revenues, standing at 10.7% of revenue in 2008, compared to 11.0% in 2007. Other operating income (net of other operating expenses) declined primarily as a result of lower net capital gains on disposals, which were €48.9 million in 2008 compared to €106.5 million in 2007.

Overall, industrial and financial capital gains totaled €114.1 million in 2008 compared to €171.5 million in 2007. We also recorded capital gains in 2008 on the sale of Clemessy and Crystal, which are recorded under income from discontinued operations, and thus are not included in operating income.



99



Back to Contents


Adjusted Operating Cash Flow

The following table shows a breakdown of adjusted operating cash flow by Division at both current and constant exchange rates:

 

Adjusted operating cash flow

   

Change

 

Year ended
December 31,
2008

Year ended
December 31,
2007

Current
exchange
rates

Constant
exchange
rates

Water

1,821.3

1,851.3

-1.6%

0.6%

Environmental Services

1,331.4

1,427.2

-6.7%

-2.5%

Energy Services

758.8

641.7

18.2%

16.0%

Transportation

287.4

267.3

7.5%

8.6%

Holding companies

(93.5)

(69.7)

  

Adjusted operating cash flow

4,105.4

4,117.8

-0.3%

 

Adjusted operating cash flow at 2008 exchange rates

4194.8

4117.8

 

1.9%


The following tables show a reconciliation of our adjusted operating cash flow to our operating income by Division in 2008 and 2007:

  

Adjustments

Operating
Income

Year ended
December 31,
2008
(€ million)

Adjusted
Operating
Cash Flow

Net
(charges)/
reversals
to operating
provisions

Net
depreciation and
amortization
charges

Replacement
costs

Goodwill
Impairment (*)

Net gains on divestitures

Others
(**)

Water

1,821.3

51.4

(468.3)

(263.6)

2.3

67.5

(12.1)

1,198.5

Environmental Services

1,331.4

(14.6)

(723.5)

-

(343.0)

16.3

(1.4)

265.2

Energy Services

758.8

13.2

(222.5)

(126.7)

5.0

11.6

(5.0)

434.4

Transportation

287.4

71.1

(238.3)

-

33.5

18.6

(1.8)

170.5

Holding companies

(93.5)

(1.2)

(11.3)

-

-

0.1

(1.9)

(107.8)

Total

4,105.4

119.9

(1,663.9)

(390.3)

(302.2)

114.1

(22.2)

1,960.8


(*)

Primarily goodwill impairment for German activities in the Environmental Services Division in 2008.

(**)

Primarily fair value adjustment on derivatives in the Water Division.


  

Adjustments

Operating
Income

Year ended December 31, 2007
(€ million)

Adjusted
Operating
Cash Flow

Net (charges)/
reversals to
operating
provisions

Net
depreciation
and
amortization
charges

Replacement
costs

Goodwill
Impairment

Net gains
on
divestitures

Others

Water

1,851.3

44.0

(437.2)

(252.6)

2.0

80.2

(20.0)

1,267.7

Environmental Services

1,427.2

(24.2)

(671.2)

-

-

56.3

(6.3)

781.8

Energy Services

641.7

15.4

(170.5)

(105.8)

10.4

4.0

(10.9)

384.3

Transportation

267.3

64.7

(233.3)

-

5.8

31.0

(4.9)

130.6

Holding companies

(69.7)

(8.8)

(6.4)

-

-

-

(18.4)

(103.3)

Total

4,117.8

91.1

(1,518.6)

(358.4)

18.2

171.5

(60.5)

2,461.1




100



Back to Contents


Adjusted Operating Income

Adjusted operating income decreased by 6.5%, from €2,433.5 million in 2007 to €2,275.0 million in 2008. Adjusted operating income in 2008 (which excludes the impact of impairment charges and certain other items of income and expense, as described below), was €2,275.0 million (or €2,347.0 million based on 2007 exchange rates), compared to €2,433.5 million in 2007.

The following table shows a breakdown of operating income and adjusted operating income by Division in 2008 and 2007:

 

Operating income

Adjusted operating income

 

2008

2007

%
change

2008

2007

%
change

Water

1,198.5

1,267.7

-5.5%

1,196.2

1,265.7

-5.5%

Environmental Services

265.2

781.8

-66.1%

620.2

781.8

-20.7%

Energy Services

434.4

384.3

13.0%

429.4

373.8

14.9%

Transportation

170.5

130.6

30.6%

137.0

115.5

18.6%

Unallocated

(107.8)

(103.3)

4.4%

(107.8)

(103.3)

4.4%

Total

1,960.8

2,461.1

-20.3%

2,275.0

2,433.5

-6.5%

Total at 2007 exchange rates

2,032.8

2,461.1

-17.4%

2,347.0

2,433.5

-3.6%

 


The following tables show a reconciliation of the Group’s operating income and adjusted operating income by Division in 2008 and 2007:

2008

Adjusted

Adjustments

Total Operating
Income

(€ million)

Operating Income

Impairment

Other(1)

Water

1,196.2

-

2.3

1,198.5

Environmental Services

620.2

(343.0)

(12.0)(2)

265.2

Energy Services

429.4

-

5.0

434.4

Transportation

137.0

(37.7)

71.2(3)

170.5

Unallocated

(107.8)

-

-

(107.8)

Total

2,275.0

(380.7)

66.5

1,960.8

(1)

Including badwill.

(2)

Represents the provisions for the restructuring plan recorded in Germany in 2008.

(3)

Represents primarily the badwill recorded in the income statement related to the purchase of minority interests in SNCM.


2007

Adjusted

Adjustments

Total Operating

(€ million)

Operating Income

Impairment

Other(1)

Income

Water

1,265.7

 

2.0

1,267.7

Environmental Services

781.8

-

-

781.8

Energy Services

373.7

 

10.6

384.3

Transportation

115.4

(6.9)

22.1(2)

130.6

Unallocated

(103.1)

-

(0.2)

(103.3)

Total

2,433.5

(6.9)

34.5

2,461.1

(1)

Including badwill.

(2)

Represents primarily operating income resulting from the completion of our purchase of our interest in SNCM, as discussed under “—Transportation” below.




101



Back to Contents


Adjusted Operating Cash Flow, Adjusted Operating Income and Operating Income - Divisions

Water

The Water Division reported operating income of €1,198.5 million in 2008 compared with €1,267.7 million for 2007 a decrease of 5.5% (-2.9% at constant exchange rates). Adjusted operating income for 2008 amounted to €1,196.2 million, compared with €1,265.7 million for 2007. Adjusted operating cash flow was €1,821.3 in 2008 compared to €1,851.3 in 2007 a decrease of 1.6% (increase of 0.6% at constant exchange rates).

Net charges to operating depreciation and amortization totaled €468.3 million in 2008 compared to €437.2 million in 2007. Net reversals in operating provisions totaled a gain of €51.4 million in 2008 compared to €44.0 million in 2007.

The Division’s operating income was mainly affected by the increase in depreciation and amortization linked to new contracts won, particularly in Asia, and recent acquisitions. Apart from this, the principal factors that affected operating income were the following:

In France, operating income increased as a result of productivity initiatives, the development of new services and sustained engineering activities and was achieved despite a decrease in volumes delivered.

Outside France, the acquisition of unregulated water operations in the UK and the provisional acceptance of the Brussels plant were positive factors. In 2007, Veolia Eau benefited from the satisfactory resolution of a dispute with the Berlin Lander concerning drainage activities.

Improvements in the Division’s Gabon operations also contributed to an improvement in operating income. However, delays in price increases and increased development costs weighed heavily on the Division’s performance in Asia, and the Division’s American operations also showed a decline.

Finally, Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies also improved its operating income as its new contracts reached maturity.

The operating margin dropped from 11.6% in 2007 to 9.5% in 2008. Adjusted operating margin was essentially the same as the adjustment items in the Water Division were not significant.

Environmental Services

Operating income in the Environmental Services Division amounted to €265.2 million in 2008 compared with €781.8 million in 2007, with adjusted operating income decreasing from €781.8 million in 2007 to €620.2 million in 2008. The main adjustment item in 2008 was a €343 million charge for impairment on goodwill resulting from the deterioration in business performance in Germany in 2008. Adjusted operating income in 2008 was also affected by a €62.6 million charge for impairment on other intangible assets (principally acquired contract rights) in Germany recognized in the opening balance sheet at the time of the acquisition of Veolia Propreté Germany (formerly SULO). Adjusted operating cash flow was €1,331.4 in 2008 compared to €1,427.2 in 2007 a decrease of 6.7% (2.5% at constant exchange rates).

Net charges to operating depreciation and amortization totaled €723.5 million in 2008 compared to €671.2 million in 2007. Net charges to operating provisions totaled €14.6 million in 2008 compared to €24.2 million in 2007.

.Foreign exchange impacts negatively affected the Division’s operating income by €50.5 million, including €34.7 million in respect of the British pound and lesser amounts for the US dollar.

The Division’s overall performance was considerably affected by the economic crisis after September 2008, particularly with a drop in volumes processed for industrial customers and a significant decrease in prices for recyclable materials.

Despite this drop in volumes, performance in the United States and the UK nevertheless remained satisfactory due to a reduction in fixed costs combined with price increases in the United States.



102



Back to Contents


The operating margin fell from 8.6% in 2007 to 2.7% in 2008, due primarily to the impact of impairment charges in Germany. Adjusted operating margin fell from 8.6% to 6.2%, reflecting the relatively lower margins of recently acquired businesses and the economic crisis beginning in September 2008.

Within the Group, the Environmental Services Division is the most sensitive to the current economic crisis. Its exposure to industrial activities is significant in both the non-hazardous (price and volume) and hazardous waste sectors. Recycling activities are particularly sensitive to the price of recyclable materials (paper and ferrous and non-ferrous metals).

Energy Services

Operating income of the Energy Services Division amounted to €434.4 million in 2008 compared with €384.3 million in 2007, an increase of 13.0% at current exchange rates and 10.7% at constant exchange rates. Adjusted operating income of the Energy Services Division was €429.4 million in 2008, an increase of 14.9% compared to €373.8 million recorded in 2007 (at constant exchange rates the increase was 12.5%). The Energy Services Division reported adjusted operating cash flow of €758.8 in 2008 compared to €641.7 in 2007, an increase of 18.2% (16.0% at constant exchange rates).

Net charges to operating depreciation and amortization totaled €222.5 million in 2008 compared to €170.5 million in 2007. Net reversals in operating provisions totaled €13.2 million in 2008 compared to €15.4 million in 2007.

In France, operating performance was positively affected by the increasing prices of energy sources and by improved productivity. Outside France, the increase in operating income also reflected the positive impact of energy prices, particularly in Central Europe, as well as the acquisition of Thermal North America Inc. in the United States, of Praterm in Poland and of other entities in Central Europe, all of which helped attenuate the increase in payroll costs, in particular in Central Europe, and the increased price of gas in the Baltic States. Sales of CO2allowances contributed less to operating income in 2008 than in 2007.

The operating margin was 6.2% in 2007 and 5.8% in 2008, reflecting primarily the impact of increased amortization charges resulting from acquisitions. Adjusted operating margin was 6.0% in 2007 and 5.8% in 2008.

Transportation

The Transportation Division’s operating income amounted to €170.5 million for 2008 compared with €130.6 million for 2007, representing an increase of 30.6% (28.8% at constant exchange rates). Adjusted operating income amounted to €137.0 million in 2008 compared with €115.5 million in 2007, an increase of 18.6% (16.6% at constant exchange rates). The difference reflected two offsetting factors: an impairment charge of €37.7 million relating to the “other European” cash generating unit (which comprises the Netherlands, Belgium), and a gain of €70.2 million, reflecting badwill recorded in the income statement related to the purchase of minority interests in SNCM. The Transportation Division reported adjusted operating cash flow of €287.4 million in 2008 compared to €267.3 million in 2007, an increase of 7.5% (8.6% at con stant exchange rates).

Net charges to operating depreciation and amortization totaled €238.3 million in 2008 compared to €233.3 million in 2007. Net reversals in operating provisions totaled €71.1 million in 2008 compared to €64.7 million in 2007.

Improved productivity, organic growth in the United States and in Eastern Europe and the greater profitability of certain contracts, mainly in the Netherlands, offset the increase in the price of fuel not yet passed on to customers, which had a negative impact of €28 million (including the negative effect of hedging derivatives) on the Division’s operating income, which was also impacted by the end of a favorable French social security regime.

The operating margin remained relatively stable, standing at 2.9% in 2008 and 2.4% in 2007. Adjusted operating margin was 2.3% in 2008 and 2.1% in 2007.

Unallocated Operating Income (loss)

Unallocated operating income (loss) represents primarily items recorded at the holding company level. Our unallocated operating loss increased from €103.3 million in 2007 to €107.8 million in 2008, primarily as a result of measures accompanying business growth and the increased importance of support projects that are implemented jointly among Divisions.



103



Back to Contents


Net Finance costs

Net Finance costs represent the cost of gross financial fair value debt, including profit and loss on related interest rate and exchange rate hedging, less income on cash and cash equivalents. The following table shows a breakdown of the Group’s finance costs, net:

(in € millions)

2008

2007

Income

202.2

151.1

Expense

(1,111.2)

(958.0)

Finance costs, net

(909.0)

(806.9)


The increase in net finance costs reflects:

the increase in average net financial debt from €14,609 million in 2007 to €16,142 million in 2008; and

the increase in the financing rate linked to the increased cost of liquidity, due to available funds being invested in short-term financial assets of limited risk while debt is refinanced based on long-term maturities and in a context of strong interest rate volatility.

The financing rate (defined as the ratio of net finance costs, excluding fair value adjustments to instruments not qualifying for hedge accounting, to average monthly net financial debt for the period) increased from 5.49% in 2007 to 5.61% in 2008. This rate takes into account early settlement of derivative transactions, which management decided to unwind in 2008. Excluding the impact of these derivatives unwinds, the financing rate was 5.78% in 2008, compared to 5.53% in 2007.

Other Financial Income (Expenses)

The following table shows a breakdown of our other financial income (expenses):

(€ million)

2008

2007

Net gains on loans and receivables

43.3

55.6

Net gains and losses on available-for-sale assets (including dividends)

9.3

10.3

Assets and liabilities at fair value through the Income Statement

35.1

5.4

Unwinding of the discount on provisions

(73.3)

(59.4)

Foreign exchange gains and losses

(42.8)

(2.2)

Other income (expenses)

(10.8)

(7.4)

Other financial income and expenses

(39.2)

2.3


Other financial income and expenses decreased from a net financial income of €2.3 million in 2007 to a net financial expense of €39.2 million in 2008.

This decrease mainly reflects:

a decrease of €12.3 million in net gains on loans and receivables, including the absence in 2008 of €26.5 million of interest income on rainwater receivables recognized in 2007 following the resolution of litigation with the Berlin Lander;

an increase of €13.9 million in the unwinding of the discount on provisions, primarily attributable to site restoration provisions in the Environmental Services Division, provisions for pension obligations recognized in accordance with IAS 19 and provisions for onerous contracts;

an increase of €29.7 million in the assets and liabilities at fair value through the Income Statement;

the appreciation of the Euro against certain currencies, resulting in an increase of €40.6 million in foreign exchange losses; and

provisions relating certain risks in respect of our interests in associates.



104



Back to Contents


Income Tax Expense

Our consolidated income tax expense for 2008 was €462.0 million, compared with €399.7 million for 2007. As a percentage of pre-tax net income from continuing operations (adjusted to eliminate our share in the net income of associates), our effective tax rate was 45.6% for 2008 compared to 24.1% for 2007.

The increase in the income tax expense in 2008 was due to:

the review of the Veolia Propreté Germany business plan, which led to the recognition of an impairment charge of €42 million in respect of deferred tax assets;

the absence of deferred tax assets in certain loss-making subsidiaries, due to insufficient taxable profit forecasts for the coming five years;

a change in tax law governing the deductibility of depreciation and amortization expenses in the United Kingdom (expense of €36 million);

the favorable impact in 2007 of tax rate cuts in Germany and the United Kingdom (income of €54.6 million).

Share of Net Income of Associates

The share of net income from associates increased from €17.1 million in 2007 to €19.4 million in 2008.

Net Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations

Net income (loss) from discontinued operations increased from a net loss of €19.1 million in 2007 to net income of €139.2 million in 2008. The main factor underlying the figure for 2008 was the €176.5 million net gain on the divestiture of Clemessy and Crystal in the Energy Services Division.

Net income for the year attributable to minority interests

Net income for the year attributable to minority interests was €304.1 million in 2008, compared to €326.9 million in 2007. It reflects in particular the minority interests in subsidiaries in the Water Division (€118.9 million), the Environmental Services Division (€18.3 million), the Energy Services Division (€144.8 million) and the Transportation Division (€19.4 million).

In 2007, net income for the year attributable to minority interests totaled €326.9 million and mainly reflected minority interests in subsidiaries in the Water Division (€178.9 million), the Environmental Services Division (€21.8 million), the Energy Services Division (€96.4 million) and the Transportation Division (€28.9 million).

The increase in the share of minority interests in the Energy Services Division in 2008 was due to share attributable to minority interests of the capital gain realized on the divestiture of Clemessy and Crystal, which had an impact of €60 million (the capital gain was recorded in net income from discontinued operations). The significant decrease in net income attributable to minority interests in the Water Division in 2008 reflected the impact in 2007 of minority interests in the settlement of the Berlin rainwater receivables matter.



105



Back to Contents


Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent

Net income for the year attributable to equity holders of the parent was €405.1 million in 2008, compared to €927.9 million in 2007. Adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent was €687.2 million in 2008, compared to €935.5 million in 2007.

Adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent for the year ended December 31, 2008 is determined as follows:

Fiscal year 2008

(€ million)

Adjusted Net
Income

Adjustments

Net Income

Operating income

2,275.0

(314.2)

1,960.8

Net finance costs

(909.0)

-

(909.0)

Other financial income and expenses

(39.2)

-

(39.2)

Income tax expense

(420.1)

(41.9)(1)

(462.0)

Share of net income of associates

19.4

-

19.4

Net loss from discontinued operations

-

139.2

139.2

Minority interests

(238.9)

(65.2)

(304.1)

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent

687.2

(282.1)

405.1

(1)

impairment charge of €41.9 million in respect of deferred tax assets following the review of the Veolia Propreté Germany business plan


Adjusted net income for the year ended December 31, 2007 is determined as follows:

Fiscal year 2007

(€ million)

Adjusted Net
Income

Adjustments

Net Income

Operating income

2,433.5

27.6

2,461.1

Net finance costs

(806.9)

-

(806.9)

Other financial income and expenses

6.9

(4.6)

2.3

Income tax expense

(410.7)

11.0

(399.7)

Share of net income of associates

17.1

-

17.1

Net income from discontinued operations

-

(19.1)

(19.1)

Minority interests

(304.4)

(22.5)

(326.6)

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent

935.5

(7.6)

927.9


Given the weighted average number of shares outstanding of 462.2 million in 2008 and 434.8 million in 2007 (adjusted for the share capital increase in July 2007 and June 2009), basic earnings per share attributable to equity holders of the parent were €0.88 in 2008, compared to €2.13 in 2007 (adjusted for the share capital increase in July 2007 and June 2009) and diluted earnings per share attributable to equity holders of the parent were €0.87 in 2008, compared to €2.11 in 2007. Basic adjusted net income per share was €1.49 in 2008, compared to €2.15 in 2007 (adjusted for the share capital increase in July 2007 and June 2009). Diluted adjusted net income per share was €1.48 in 2008, compared to €2.13 in 2007 (adjusted for the share capital increase in July 2007 and June 2009).



106



Back to Contents


LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our operations generate significant cash flow. In 2007,2009, we significantly reduced our operatingfinancial debt between December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2009, mainly as result of the impact of financial and industrial disposals during the period on our capacity to repay debt. In 2009, our cash flow beforefrom operating activities (including the impact of changes in working capitalcapital) was more than sufficient to cover our investment requirements.  We also have access to sources of liquidity that include bank financing, international bond marketsinvesting requirements, interest payments and international equity markets.income tax payments. We believe that our working capital is sufficient for our present requirements.

Cash Flows

OperatingThe following table sets forth information relating to our consolidated cash flow before changes in working capitalflows for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009.

(€ million)

Year ended
December 31, 2009

Year ended
December 31, 2008

Operating cash flow before changes in working capital and income taxes paid

3,939

4,178

Changes in working capital

432

(81)

Income taxes paid

(408)

(347)

Net cash from operating activities

3,963

3,750

Net cash from/(used in) investing activities

(1,662)

(3,335)

Net increase/(decrease) in current borrowings

(1,324)

(1,437)

New non-current borrowings and other debt

3,301

3,590

Principal payments on non-current borrowings and other debt

(1,515)

(185)

Issue of share capital by the non-controlling interests

157

(80)

Other share capital changes

5

3

Dividends paid

(434)

(754)

Interest paid

(730)

(847)

Net cash from/(used in) financing activities

(540)

290


Net cash from operating activities increased 9.8%, from €3,844.4€3,750 million in 20062008 to €4,219.4€3,963 million in 2007. Excluding2009, reflecting the cash flows of discontinued operations (negative €8.0 millionfollowing:

A decrease in 2006 and negative €1.5 million in 2007), operating cash flow before changes in working capital increased 9.6%and income taxes paid, from €4,178 million in 2007, reflecting2008, to €3,939 million in 2009, which we discuss below.

Changes in working capital were €432 million in 2009 compared to €(81) million in 2008. The increase in working capital requirements was due to targeted action plans for trade receivables in certain countries; the reduction in activity or prices mainly in the Environmental Services and Energy Services Divisions; and temporary factors mainly relating to a delay in the collection of fees and taxes by clients (we collect fees and taxes on behalf of certain clients, and remit the relevant amounts to the public authority at times determined by them, which vary from year to year).

Income tax payments in 2009 were €408 million, compared to €347 million in 2008.

The large majority of our improved performance and growth. The definition of operating cash flow before changes in working capital recommended by the CNC (French National Accounting Institute) excludes the impact of financing activities and taxation.

Net cash from operating activities increased from €3,389.6 million in 2006 to €3,634.6 million in 2007, primarily as a result of the increase in operating cash flows before changes in working capital. Working capital requirements increased slightly in 2007 given the growth of activities.

Net cash used in investing activities increased from €2,904.0 million in 2006 to €4,018.4 million in 2007. This increase of €1,114.4 million on 2006 was mainly due to investments in Sulo Group companies in Germany (€129 million), the Thermal North America Inc. Group in the United States (€308 million), VES Technitalia (formerly TMT) in Italy (€100.5 million) and an increase in capital expenditure of €501.1million.

Financing cash flows changed from a net outflow of €71.5 million in 2006 to a net inflow of €940.8 million in 2007.  Fiscal year 2007 financing cash flows included:

a €2.6 billion share capital increase that was completed on July 10;

a €1 billion bond issue paying a fixed-rate interest of 5.125% and maturing May 2022, issued in May;

a GBP500 million bond issue issued in October (supplemented by an additional GBP150 million bond issue in January 2008); and

the redemption of the EMTN issued in November 2005 in the amount of €491 million.


As a result ofincome taxes paid reflects the cash flows described above, the effectsproduced by ordinary operations in our Divisions and our holding company activities. This constitutes our “adjusted operating cash flow,” which we use as a performance indicator and analyze under “—Results of Operations—Year ended December 31, 2009 compared to year ended December 31, 2008 – Operating Income.” The remainder reflects financial operating cash flow (meaning cash flow related to items recorded in our income statement as “other financial income and expenses,” consisting primarily of foreign exchange rates representing agains and losses), as well as operating cash outflow of €102.8 million, net cash totaled €2,656.2 million as of December 31, 2007, compared to €2,202 million as of December 31, 2006.

Sources of Funds

Financings

As of December 31, 2007, Moody’s and Standard & Poor's rated VE SA as follows:

Short-term

Long-term

Outlook

Recent events

Moody’s

P-2

A3

Stable

In October 2007, Moody’s confirmed the rating awarded to Veolia Environnement on June 27, 2005.

Standard and Poor's

A-2

BBB+

Stable

On June 12, 2007, Standard and Poor’s confirmed the rating awarded to Veolia Environnement on October 3, 2005.

On September 26, 2007, following the end of the structural subordination impacting Veolia Environnement debt, Standard and Poor’s increased the long-term rating awarded to bond issues from BBB to BBB+.


flow from discontinued operations.



92107



Back to Contents


Veolia Environnement pursued an active refinancing policyThe decrease in 2007, aimed at strengthening itsoperating cash flow before changes in working capital and income taxes paid in 2009 reflected primarily the decrease in adjusted operating cash flow, which was €3,955.8 million in 2009 compared to €4,105.4 million in 2008. See “—Results of Operations—Year ended December 31, 2009 compared to year ended December 31, 2008 – Operating Income.” Financial operating cash flow was a net outflow of €3.0 million in 2009 compared to a net inflow of €22.8 million in 2008. Discontinued operations resulted in a net operating cash outflow of €14.2 million in 2009, compared to a net inflow of €50.2 million in 2008.

Net cash used in investing activities was €1,662 million in 2009, compared to €3,335 million in 2008. This decrease was due to a decrease in financial positioninvestments, linked to the slowdown in external growth in 2009, as a result of the adaptation of the Group to the economic crisis. In addition, in 2009 we increased our disposals (industrial and extending debt maturities.financial), as described in more detail below under “—Divestitures and Disposals of Assets.” Industrial capital expenditures decreased significantly in 2009, as described in more detail below under “—Investing Activities.”

The main debt facilities maturingNet cash used in 2007financing activities was €540 million in 2009 as compared to net cash received from financing activities in 2008 of €290 million. As described in further detail below under “Financing Activities”, we made significant principal payments on non-current borrowings and either redeemed or refinancedother debts compared to 2008. On the other hand, dividends paid in cash in 2009 (58% of the dividends were paid in shares) decreased compared with 2008. Issue of share capital to the minority shareholders (which we refer to as follows:“non-controlling interests” pursuant to IFRS) increased in 2009 compared with 2008.

€491 million EMTN issue (series 16), issued in November 2005 and maturing May 30, 2007 redeemed in full at maturity, and

€142 million EMTN issue (series 19), issued in January 2006 and maturing July 18, 2007, redeemed in full at maturity.


Investing Activities

In addition Veolia Environnement launchedto cash flow relating to investing activities, we monitor our net investments on an enterprise value basis, which permits us to analyze our investments by taking into account the followingdebt and cash of the entities in which we invest (we analyze this debt and cash as part of our consolidated net financial debt, as described under “– Financial Debt Structure” below). We also include investments made under finance lease arrangements, as well as the portion attributable to non-controlling interests of loans that we make to entities that we control. In addition, for purposes of our analysis of net investments, when non-controlling interests subscribe for new bond issues for a total euroshares in entities that we control, we consider the subscription as the equivalent of €1,882 milliona disposal (the amount of the subscription is recorded in our consolidated cash flow statement as net cash from financing act ivities).

As a result, “Net investment” includes capital expenditure net of industrial asset disposals (purchases of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment net of disposals), financial investment net of financial disposals (purchases of financial assets net of disposals, adding or subtracting (as applicable) the net debt of companies entering or leaving the scope of consolidation), new operating financial assets, principal payments on operating financial assets and the share capital increases subscribed by non-controlling interests.

The following table sets forth the calculation of our net investments for the years ended December 31, 2007:

in February, a €200 million bond issue paying floating-rate interest (Euribor 3M+0.50%), maturing August 2008

in May, a €1 billion bond issue paying fixed-rate interest of 5.125%, maturing May 2022,

in October, a GBP 500 million bond issue paying fixed-rate interest of 6.125%, maturing October 2037.


No major bank financing was provided or repaid in 2007.  Our existing syndicated credit documentation and bilateral credit lines do not contain any events of default tied to restrictive financial covenants (such as debt payout ratios or interest coverage ratios).  The debt payout ratio (the ratio between net debt and operating cash flow adjusted for certain items) is used to determine the margin applicable to certain significant financings under pricing grids, such as the syndicated credit lines signed in 2004 for a maximum aggregate amount of US$1.25 billion (drawn down in the amount of approximately €544 million as of December 31, 2007).  2009.

Financial ratios may also be used in certain project financings, which are generally implemented through special purpose entities, for which the financing is based on the cash flows generated by the relevant project.  These project financings, the amounts of which are not individually significant at the Group level, are either without recourse or with limited recourse.  In addition, in certain cases multilateral development banks may require our affiliates to include financial ratios relating to the financial statements of those entities in their financing agreements.

We centralize our significant financings to ensure optimization.  Certain financings contracted by the parent company contain restrictions on structural subordination intended to assure lenders that the majority of the financings are at the level of Veolia Environnement.

Our financial debt structure as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 is reflected in the following table, which also provides a reconciliation of our total borrowings to net financial debt.

(€ million)

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31,2006

Non current borrowings

13,948.0

14,001.6

Current borrowings

3,805.0

2,904.1

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

459.4

456.0

Sub-total borrowings

18,212.4

17,361.7

Cash and cash equivalents

(3,115.6)

(2,658.0)

Fair value on hedging instruments

27.7

(28.8)

Net financial debt

15,124.5

14,674.9


(€ million)

Year ended
December 31, 2009

Year ended
December 31, 2008

Net cash flow from / (used in) investing activities in the cash flow statement

(1,662)

(3,335)

New operating financial assets (investments under finance leases)

(17)

(22)

Capital expenditures net of grants (investments under finance leases)

(27)

(113)

Net financial debt of entities acquired

(151)

(479)

Net cash of entities divested

312

71

Dividends received from associates

(15)

(16)

Increase / (decrease) in receivables and other financial assets*

(163)

312

Net investments calculated on an enterprise value basis (before issuance of share capital to non-controlling interests)

(1,723)

(3,582)

Issue of share capital to non-controlling interests**

138

27

Total net investments

(1,585)

(3,555)


*

 In 2009 and 2008, this reflects primarily the share attributable to non-controlling interests in loans to Dalkia International and its subsidiaries and advance payments to suppliers in respect of trains in our Transporation Division.

**

In 2008, the issue of share capital to non-controlling interests does not include the impact of a capital reduction of €131 million in the Berlin activities of the Water Division, which represented a pro rata distribution to our Company and other shareholders, which used their share to pay other receivables owed to us.



93108



Back to Contents


The following table sets forthshows the maturity schedulebreakdown of our long-term borrowings as of December 31, 2007:investing activities during 2009 and 2008 by operating segments:

(€ million)

Total

Amounts falling due in

2 to 3 years

4 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Bond issues

9,009.6

122.3

1,020.5

7,866.8

Bank borrowings

4,938.4

1,636.4

1,120.2

2,181.8

Non current borrowings

13,948.0

1,758.7

2,140.7

10,048.6

Total net investments by Operating segments

(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2009

Year ended December 31,2008

Water

684

1,208

Environmental Services

227

1,323

Energy Services

454

586

Transportation

158

353

Others

62

85

Net investments by Operating segments

1,585

3,555


Shareholders Equity

In order to support our growth strategy and to benefit from market conditions, we launched a cash rights offering (augmentation de capital avec maintien des droits préférentiels de souscription des actionnaires) on June 12, for an amountOur total net investments of €2,581.5 million (before deduction of share issue costs against additional paid-in capital).  The subscription period opened on June 14 and closed on June 27, 2007. Overall, the transaction resulted in the issuance of 51,941,040 new shares with a par value of €5 each, representing a share capital increase of €259.7 million and the recognition of additional paid-in capital of €2,321.8 million.  This fund-raising transaction enabled in particular the Group to strengthen its equity and increase its financial flexibility and thereby continue its development under good conditions.

In addition, third parties acquired minority interests in certain consolidated companies in 2007, in line with our objective to find partners in order to exploit commercial opportunities and/or dilute our risk exposure in certain countries.  These transactions, which provided us with funds of €206€1,585 million in 2007, included primarily the following:

the acquisition2009 compared to €3,555 million in 2008 are broken down as follows by segment and by type of a 10% stake by the EBRD in Veolia Voda, the holding company for Veolia Eau activities in Central and Eastern Europe, by way of a share capital increase of €90.4 million;investment:

Year ended December 31, 2009

(in € million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy
Services

Transportation

Other

Total

Industrial investments

835

626

531

445

56

2,493

Financial investments

160

9

99

62

8

338

New operating financial assets

279

74

121

26

0

500

Total Gross Investments

1,274

709

751

533

64

3,331

Industrial divestitures

(45)

(40)

(14)

(158)

(2)

(259)

Financial divestitures

(244)

(366)

(121)

(163)

-

(894)

Principal payments on operating financial assets

(204)

(71)

(150)

(30)

-

(455)

Issue of share capital to non-controlling interests

(97)

(5)

(12)

(24)

-

(138)

Total Net Investments

684

227

454

158

62

1,585


the acquisition by IFC/Proparco of a stake in the share capital of the water division holding company for activities in the Middle East and Africa, generating funds of €34.8 million;

the acquisition by partners of stakes in Chinese contracts of the water division (Lanzhou and Liuzhou), generating funds of €64.2 million.

Year ended December 31, 2008

(in € million)

Water

Environmental
Services

Energy
Services

Transportation

Other

Total

Industrial investments

950

990

539

342

72

2,893

Financial investments

332

389

324

218

17

1,280

New operating financial assets

332

55

133

11

(2)

529

Total Gross Investments

1,614

1,434

996

571

87

4,702

Industrial divestitures

(70)

(45)

(14)

(201)

-

(330)

Financial divestitures

(164)

(17)

(248)

(1)

(2)

(432)

Principal payments on operating financial assets

(161)

(48)

(133)

(16)

-

(358)

Issue of share capital to non-controlling interests

(11)

(1)

(15)

0

-

(27)

Total Net Investments

1,208

1,323

586

353

85

3,555


Divestitures and Disposals of Assets

Asset divestitures totaled €415 million in 2007, or €394.6 million net of the cash of companies sold.  These transactions included both financial divestitures and industrial divestitures.

Financial divestitures in 2007 included primarily the following (€202 million excluding cash balances of companies sold):

19% of Veolia Service Environnement Maroc (Veolia Eau) for €36.4 million,

transportation activities in Spain for €24.0 million,

shares in Residuos Industriales Multiquim SA by SARPI Mexico for €13.1 million,

transportation activities in Denmark for €11.6 million,

a 39% stake in Proactiva Mexico for €9.9 million.


The main industrial divestitures in 2007 totaled €212.9 million and included primarily the following transactions:

sale of Fawley installations in the United Kingdom in the environmental services division for GBP24 million (€35.8 million);

sale of buildings, in particular in the Netherlands in the transportation division, for €16 million.

other industrial asset sales reflecting mainly the handover of operating assets.




94109



Back to Contents


In addition, principal payments received on operatingIndustrial Investments

Given the economic context, we adopted a restrictive investment policy substantially reducing financial assets totaled €360.7 million in 2007, compared to €438.1 million in 2006.  

Capital Expenditures

The following table shows a breakdown of our capital expenditures during 2006 and 2007:


(€ million)

Industrial investments (1)

Financial investments (2)

New operating financial assets

 

2007

2006

2007

2006

2007

2006

Water

866

853

794

214

280

262

Environmental Services

846

692

482

875

32

20

Energy Services

429

318

547

102

73

63

Transportation

459

302

101

253

36

16

Other

42

32

42

8

-

-

Total

2,642

2,197

1,966

1,452

421

361

(1) including assets purchased under finance lease

(2) excluding cash and cash equivalents of companies acquired


Industrial investments

Industrial investments, (excluding assets purchased under finance leases) totaled €2,519 million in 2007, an increase of 25% compared to 2006but without putting into question capital expenditure of €2,018 million.a contractual nature or necessary for industrial activities. The decline primarily involves Environmental Services. Industrial investments including assets purchased under finance leases totaled €2,642amounted to €2,493 million in 20072009, compared to €2,893 million in 2008 and brokebreak down as follows:

866835 million in the water division (up 1.5%Water Division (down 12.1% compared to 2006)2008), including growth investment of €335 million and maintenance-related investment of €531 million (€498€336 million in 2006)growth investments and €499 million in maintenance-related investments (€538 million in 2008). Growth investments in 2009 mainly concerned concession assets in France, China and Morocco.

846626 million in the environmental services division (up 22.3%Environmental Services Division (down 36.8% compared to 2006)2008), including €130 million in growth investment of €292investments and €496 million andin maintenance-related investment of €554 million.investments (€745 million in 2008). The increasedecrease in capital expenditure mainly reflectswas due to the growthadaptation of the environmental services division andEnvironmental Services Division to the launch of a number of major industrial projects in France (new storage capacity) and Italy (incinerator).economic crisis.

429531 million in the Energy Services Division (up 34.9%(down 1.5% compared to 2006)2008), including €296 million in growth investment of €166investments and €235 million andin maintenance-related investment of €263 million. This increaseinvestments (€278 million in investment reflects activity growth and, in particular, the construction of heat and electricity production installations in France.2008).

459445 million in the transportation divisionTransportation Division (up 52.0%30.1% compared to 2006)2008), including €68 million in growth investment of €233investments and €377 million andin maintenance-related investment of €226 million. Capital expenditure includes the purchase of the Jean Nicoli ship by SNCM.

investments (€294 million in 2008).

Maintenance-related investmentinvestments totaled €1,590€1,632 million (4.9%in 2009 (4.7% of total revenue), compared to €1,417€1,860 million in 2006 (5%2008 (5.2% of total revenue).


Financial Investments

Financial investments including €131 million of cash and cash equivalent balances of companies acquired in 2007, totaled €1,835€338 million in 2007,2009, compared to €1,291€1,280 million in 2006.

In 2006,2008. The main financial investments included primarilyinvestment was the acquisition by Veolia Eau of Banska Bystrica and Poprada cogeneration plant in Slovakia for €71 million and of the Kunming and Liuzhou contracts in China for €60 million, the acquisition by Veolia Propreté of CleanawayEstonia (Digismart) in the United Kingdom for €745 million and of Biffa Belgium for €63 million and the acquisition by Veolia Transport of SNCMEnergy Services Division for €72 millionmillion.

New Operating Financial Assets

New operating financial assets are made up of IFRIC 12 and of ShuttleportIFRIC 4 loans (see notes 1.21 and Supershuttle in the United States for €100 million.



95



Back1.22 to Contents


Financial investments of €1,966our consolidated financial statements) and totaled €500 million in 2007 (excluding cash2009, compared to €529 million in 2008, and cash equivalents balances of companies acquired) brokebreak down as follows:

794279 million in the water division (compared to €214 millionWater Division, mainly comprising new operating financial assets under the Berlin contract and certain investments in 2006). The main financial investments concern the non-regulated assets of Thames Water for €86 million, the acquisition of the Lanzhou, HaikouAsia (China and Tianjin Shibei in China (for €98 million, €91 million and €219 million respectively), the assets of the Process Services Division of Tetra Technologies for €43 millionKorea) and the acquisition of Anox Kaldnes, a Swedish technology company, for €74 million.Middle East (Oman Sur);

48274 million in the environmental services division (compared to €875 million in 2006). The main financial investments concern the acquisitionEnvironmental Services Division, representing an increase of Sulo in Germany for €156 million (net of the proceeds of the sale of the ET Division at the end of July 2007), of VES Tecnitalia (formerly TMT) in Italy for €104€19 million and Allied assetscomprising various investments in the United States for €71 million.Europe;

547121 million in the Energy Services Division, (compared to €102 million in 2006). The main financial investments concern the acquisition of Thermal North America, Inc. for €316 million, of Hungarian companies for €63 million, of Kolin in the Czech Republic for €27 million and of cogeneration companies in Germany for €29.5 million.

€101 million in the transportation division (compared to €253 million in 2006). The main financial investments concern the acquisition of People Travel Group (PTG) in Sweden for €46.6 million and of “transport-on-demand” companies in the United States for €19 million.


Cash balances of companies acquired total €131 million and mainly concern Sulo Group companies in the amount of €26 million.

New Operating Financial Assets (IFRIC 12 and IFRIC 4 loans)

New operating financial assets were €421 million in 2007, compared to €361 million in 2006.  The 2007 figure breaks down as follows:

€280 million in the water division, an increase of €18 million compared to 2006; this increase is mainly attributable to the Oman Sur BOT contract in the amount of €47 million and the increase in Berlin Water receivables for €26 million, offset byrepresenting a €60 million reduction in BOT construction activities in Belgium and the Netherlands.

€32 million in the environmental services division, an increasedecrease of €12 million compared to 2006.2008; and

7326 million in the Energy Services Division, an increase of €10 million compared to 2006.

€36 million in the transportation division, an increase of €20 million compared to 2006.


Research and Development; Patents and Licenses

See “Information on the Company—Business Overview—Research and Development” and “Information on the Company—Business Overview—Intellectual Property” for a description of our investments in these areas.

Goodwill

Goodwill amounted to €6,913.2 million at December 31, 2007, compared to  €5,705.0 million at December 31, 2006. The increase of €1,208.2 million reflects our growth during fiscal year 2007: €748.2 million of the increase relates to the Cash Generating Unit (“CGU”) Environmental Services Germany, following the acquisition of Sulo, €139.6 million relates to the CGU Energy North America (acquisition of Thermal North America Inc.) and €114.6 million relates to the CGU Environmental Services Italy (acquisition of VSA Tecnitalia, formerly TMT).  The CGUs of each division are concentrated in France, the United States, Germany, Great Britain and the Czech Republic.

The CGUs carrying the most significant amounts of goodwill at December 31, 2007 were Environmental Services United Kingdom (€824.2 million), Water France Distribution (€760.5 million) and Environmental Services Germany (€748.2 million).Transportation Division.



96110



Back to Contents


Industrial and Financial Divestitures

Divestitures amounted to €1,153 million in 2009, compared to €762 million in 2008, and break down as follows:

industrial divestitures of €259 million, including €158 million in the Transportation Division (Freightactivity for €94 million); and

financial divestitures of €894 million, including:

incineration activity in the United States in Environmental Services for €220 million;

Veolia Propreté Nettoyage Multiservices for €111 million in the Environmental Services Division;

facilities Management activities in the United Kingdom in the Energy Services Division for €90 million; and

water activities in North Africa and the Middle East for €189 million.

Principal Payments on Operating Financial Assets

Principal payments on operating financial assets amounted to €455 million in 2009 (including €204 million in the Water Division and €150 million in the Energy Services Division), compared to €358 million in 2008.

Issue of Share Capital to Non-Controlling Interests

The issue of share capital to non-controlling interests totaled €138 million in 2009, compared to €27 million in 2008. It mainly concerns the Water Division for €97 million in 2009 and corresponds to the issuance by Veolia Voda of new shares representing a 6.88% interest to the ERBD in the amount of €70 million.

Cash flows from operations minus total net investments

In order to monitor its liquidity position after taking into account net investments, we use an indicator equal to our adjusted operating cash flow, plus operating cash flow from discontinued activities, less total net investments. The following table breaks down this indicator by Division:


(€ million)

As of
December 31,
2009

As of
December 31,
2008

Water

1,152

613

Environmental Services

977

40

Energy Services

279

185

Transportation

153

(58)

Other

(204)

(179)

Adjusted operating cash flow, plus operating cash flow from discontinued operations, less total net investment

2,357

601




111



Back to Contents


Financing Activities

Net cash from / (used in) financing activities in 2009 and 2008:

We used a net amount of €540 million of cash in financing activities in 2009, compared to a net cash inflow from financing activities of €290 million in 2008. The following table breaks down our net cash used in (or from) financing activities in 2008 and 2009.


(€ million)

December 31, 2009

December 31, 2008

Change

Net increase/(decrease) in current borrowings

(1,324)

(1,437)

113

New non-current borrowings and other debts

3,301

3,590

(289)

Principal payments on non-current borrowings and other debt

(1,515)

(185)

(1,330)

Issue of share capital by the non-controlling interests

157

(80)

237

Other movements in equity

5

3

2

Dividends paid

(434)

(754)

320

Interest paid

(730)

(847)

117

Net cash from (used in) financing activities in the cash flow statement

(540)

290

(830)


These changes were mainly due to:

a €289 million decrease in new non-current borrowings and other debts in the cash flow statement:

in 2009, we issued €2,250 million of new bonds;

in 2008, we issued new bonds under our EMTN (Euro Medium Term Notes) program in the amount of €572 million; we reopened the GBP-denominated series 24 bond issue maturing in 2037 in the amount of GBP 150 million (Euro equivalent of €157 million as of December 31, 2008); we reopened the EUR-denominated series 21 bond issue maturing in 2017 in the amount of €140 million; we opened the series 15 corporate bond issue maturing in 2015, in the amount of €275 million; finally, on May 21, 2008 we issued a new €1.8 billion fixed-rate bond.

Principal payments on non-current borrowings and other debt totalled €1,515 million in 2009, compared to €185 million in 2008, representing an increase of €1,330 million.

In 2009, principal payments on non-current borrowings and other debt related to transactions on the multi-currency syndicated loans, including essentially the repayment of €800 million on the Euro syndicated loan;

In 2008, principal payments on non-current borrowings and other debt were not significant.

a €117 million decrease over the period in interest paid in line with the decrease in the Group financing rate;

a decrease of €113 million in current borrowings; and

a decrease of €320 million in dividends paid; of the €434 million in dividends paid in 2009, €232 million was paid to shareholders of the parent company (€554 million less dividends paid in shares of €322 million), and the remainder was paid to non-controlling interests in entities that we control.



112



Back to Contents


Sources of Funds

Financings

As of December 31, 2009, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s rated Veolia Environnement SA as follows:

Short-term

Long-term

Outlook

Recent events

Moody’s

P-2

A3

Negative

On March 26, 2009, Moody’s confirmed the ratings assigned to Veolia Environnement on June 27, 2005, but downgraded the outlook from stable to negative.

Standard & Poor’s

A-2

BBB+

Negative

On March 25, 2009, Standard and Poor’s confirmed the ratings assigned to Veolia Environnement on October 3, 2005, but downgraded the outlook from stable to negative. On January 4, 2010, these ratings were confirmed by Standard and Poor’s.


In 2009, Veolia Environnement continued to implement an active refinancing policy. The main borrowings maturing in 2009 that were repaid or refinanced are as follows:

€800 million draw-down on the syndicated loan was repaid on April 17, 2009;

the CZK660 million EMTN Series 8 bond issue (€22.1 million Euro equivalent at historical rates), which matured on April 29, 2009; and

the U.S. $27 million EMTN Series 13 bond issue (€22.2 million Euro equivalent at historical rates), which matured on March 4, 2009.

In addition, Veolia Environnement issued €2,250 million of new bonds under its EMTN (Euro Medium Term Notes) program:

On April 24, 2009, Veolia Environnement issued:

€1,250 million principle amount of new bonds, bearing fixed-rate interest at 5.25% per annum and maturing on April 24, 2014 (series 25) and

€750 million principle amount of new bonds, bearing fixed-rate interest at 6.75% per annum and maturing on April 24, 2019 (series 26).

On June 29, 2009, Veolia Environnement issued €250 million principle amount of new bonds, bearing fixed-rate interest at 5.70% per annum and maturing on June 29, 2017 (series 27).

We centralize our significant financings to ensure optimization. Certain financings contracted by the parent company contain restrictions on structural subordination intended to assure lenders that the majority of the financings are at the level of Veolia Environnement.

Our financing, including the notes issued by the Company under its EMTN program (€11.2 billion outstanding as of December 31, 2009) does not contain any event of default provisions tied to compliance with a debt ratio, an interest coverage ratio or a minimum credit rating, except for the 2003 U.S. private placement notes (see note 17 to our consolidated financial statements) of which €299.1 million were outstanding as of December 31, 2009 which are subject to two coverage ratios (debt hedging ratio < 5.3 and interest hedging ratio > 3.2).

Our existing syndicated credit documentation and bilateral credit lines do not contain any events of default tied to restrictive financial covenants (such as debt payout ratios or interest coverage ratios). The debt payout ratio (the ratio between net debt and operating cash flow adjusted for certain items) is used to determine the margin applicable to certain significant financings under pricing grids, such as the syndicated credit lines signed in 2004 for a maximum aggregate amount of US$1.125 billion (drawn down in the amount of approximately € 544 million as of December 31, 2009).



113



Back to Contents


At the end of 2009, we were in compliance with the covenants of all our material financings.

Financial ratios may also be used in certain project financings, which are generally implemented through project entities, for which the financing is based on cash flows generated by the relevant project. These project financings, the amounts of which are not individually significant at the Group level, are either without recourse or with limited recourse. In addition, in certain cases multilateral development banks may require our subsidiaries to include financial ratios relating to the financial statements of those entities in their financing agreements.

As of December 31, 2009, the financing agreements containing such covenants and amounting to more than €100 million (Group share) were as follows:

Borrower

Outstanding as of December 31, 2009

(€ million)

Type of covenant

Aquiris
(Water Division - Belgium)

179.1

DPR* and deadline for obtaining final acceptance for the plant

Delfluent
(Water Division – Netherlands)

112.4

DPR*, forecast DPR* and duration of financing

Shenzhen
(Water Division – China)

100.9

Minimum reserve account

Redal (Water Division – Morocco)

103.6

Working capital, equity/share capital and DPR*


*

Debt Payout Ratio (DPR) is equal to net financial debt divided by EBITDA. The minimum required ratios vary according to the financing.


As of December 31, 2009, the Group complied with all the covenants included in the documentation of these significant financing agreements.

With regard to the Aquiris project (a wastewater treatment plant in Brussels), the lenders waived their right as of January 29, 2010 to demand early repayment of the financing until June 30, 2010. At the same time, a demand guarantee, exercisable as of June 30, 2010 and maturing on August 31, 2010, was granted by Veolia Eau-CGE to the lenders.

A financing agreement with an outstanding amount of €81 million as of December 31, 2009 contained covenants with which the relevant borrower was not in compliance.

Liquidity

The following table sets forth our principal sources of available liquidity, on a gross basis and net of current debt, bank overdrafts and other cash position items, as of December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009:

(€ million)

As of
December 31,
2009

As of
December 31,
2008

As of
December 31,
2007

Veolia Environnement:

   

Undrawn Medium Term syndicated loans

3,694.6

2,890.3

4,000.0

Undrawn Medium Term credit lines

400.0

575.0

850.0

Undrawn Short Term credit lines

575.0

350.0

175.0

Other financial assets (marketable securities)

-

-

-

Cash & cash equivalents

4,091.2

2,283.6

1,550.8

Subsidiaries:

   

Cash & cash equivalents

1,523.2

1,566.0

1,564.8

Total liquid assets and availabilities

10,284.0

7,664.9

8,140.6

Current debt and bank overdrafts, and other cash position items

   

Current debt

2,983.1

3,219.7

3,805.0

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

454.9

465.7

459.4

Total current debts and bank overdrafts and other cash position items

3,438.0

3,685.4

4,264.4

Total liquid assets and availabilities, net of current debt and bank overdrafts, and other cash position items

6,846.0

3,979.5

3,876.2




114



Back to Contents



Undrawn credit lines as of December 31, 2009 are as follows:

Bank

Amount in € million

Maturity

NATIXIS

150

March 31, 2012

BNP Paribas

150

March 2, 2012

HSBC

100

June 30, 2011

RBS formerly ABN

100

December 29, 2010

SG

150

December 23, 2010

RBS

125

December 20, 2010

CIC and BFCM

100

November 15, 2010

CACIB

100

March 4, 2010

Total

975


Financial Debt Structure

We use net financial debt, a non-GAAP financial measure, to analyze our financial position. The following table sets forth the calculation of our net financial debt as of December 31, 2009:

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

Non-current borrowings

17,647.3

17,063.9

Current borrowings

2,983.1

3,219.7

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

454.9

465.7

Sub-total borrowings

21,085.3

20,749.3

Cash and cash equivalents

(5,614.4)

(3,849.6)

Fair value gains/losses on hedge derivatives

(343.2)

(371.5)

Net financial debt

15,127.7

16,528.2


The ratio of (i) net financial debt to (ii) cash flow from operations before working capital and income taxes paid plus cash generated from principal payments on operating financial assets, was 3.4 as of December 31, 2009 compared with 3.6 as of December 31, 2008. This ratio is used by management to monitor our capacity to repay debt. We generally seek to maintain this ratio between 3.5 and 4.0 on the basis of current accounting presentation.

Due to the change in the presentation rules for replacement costs in the consolidated cash flow statement (as described above under “—Accounting for Concessions and other items”), the calculation of this ratio will be amended from 2010, resulting in a target coverage ratio of between 3.85 and 4.35 (instead of 3.5 to 4 using the 2009 accounting presentation).

The following table sets forth the maturity schedule of our long-term borrowings as of December 31, 2009:

  

Maturing in

(€ million)

Amount

2 to 3 years

4 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Bond issues

13,264.5

1,045.2

2,951.7

9,267.6

Bank borrowings

4,382.8

1,511.1

779.7

2,092.0

Non-current borrowings

17,647.3

2,556.3

3,731.4

11,359.6




115



Back to Contents


Shareholders Equity

Total equity attributable to owners of the Company was €7,460.6 million as of December 31, 2009, an increase of €459.4 million compared to €7,001.2 at year-end 2008. In addition to the impact of 2009 net income and the payment of the €1.21 per share fiscal year 2008 dividend in 2009, we recorded foreign exchange translation adjustments of €82.4 million in 2009, as well as €82.0 million of net investment hedge adjustments (which represent currency translation adjustments on certain loans to affiliates that meet the criteria of a net investment as defined under IAS 21 “The effect of changes in foreign exchange rates”). We also recorded an increase of €341.1 million in equity from the issuance of new shares, primarily as a result of the election by shareholders to receive their 2008 dividends in new shares.

Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)

Our investment policy requires us to analyze different criteria in making investment decisions, including decisions relating to capital expenditures and financial investments.  In order “ROCE” or “Return on Capital Employed” is a measurement tool that we use to manage the profitability ofreturn on our contracts globally we use a measureand to make investment decisions, without regard to the method of performance, which we refer to as “return on capital employed”financing of those investments (equity or “ROCE,” that measures our ability to provide a return on the capital invested in our business.  We definedebt). ROCE asis the ratio of (i) our results of operations, net of tax, and our share of net income offrom operations (adjusted operating income, after income from associates and tax, but excluding revenue fromand tax related to operating financial assets,assets), divided by (ii) the average amount of capital employed in our business during the same year.

Since the shift to IFRS in 2005, for purposes of our ROCE calculation, capital Capital employed excludes operating financial operating assets and operatingnet income from operations excludes the related income. The implementation of IFRIC12 in 2006 introduced important modifications affecting financial operating assets, which are accounted for in the financial statements.  

Net income from operations is calculated as follows:

(€ million)

2007

2006

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

Adjusted operating income

2,469.2

2,222.2

1,932.4

2,275.0

+ Share of net income of associates

16.9

6.0

1.4

19.4

- Income tax expense(1) (2)

(406.9)

(463.2)

(213.2)

(411.4)

- Revenue from operating financial assets

(345.1)

(351.0)

(394.4)

(397.9)

+ Income tax expense allocated to operating financial assets

62.5

54.5

77.1

75.4

Net income from operations

1,796.6

1,468.5

1,403.3

1,560.5

  

(1)

In 2004, the financial restructuring transactions following the divestiture of the U.S. activities of the water division generated tax losses which were recognized in the consolidated balance sheet. Given its exceptional nature, the resulting credit of €138.4 million recognized in net income was eliminated from the calculation of ROCE. The utilization of these tax losses in 2006 and 2007 generated charges of €32.7 million and €24.2 million respectively, which were similarly eliminated from the calculation of ROCE.

(2)

In 2006, the deferred tax credit of €86.3 million relating to the restructuring of the U.S. tax group was eliminated from adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent, and also from the calculation of ROCE. In 2007, a tax benefit of €11 million (relating to an SNCM tax status) was excluded from this calculation.


(1)

In 2004, the financial restructuring transactions following the divestiture of the U.S. activities of the Water Division generated tax losses which were recognized in the consolidated balance sheet. Given its exceptional nature, the resulting credit of €138.4 million recognized in net income was eliminated from the calculation of ROCE. The utilization of these tax losses in 2008 and 2009 generated charges of €8.7 million and €29.0 million respectively, which were similarly eliminated from the calculation of ROCE.

(2)

In 2008, the review of the business plan of Veolia Environmental Services Germany, led to the recognition of an impairment charge of €41.9 million in respect of deferred tax assets, which is eliminated from the calculation of ROCE.


(1)

In 2004, the financial restructuring transactions following the divestiture of the U.S. activities of the Water Division generated tax losses which were recognized in the consolidated balance sheet. Given its exceptional nature, the resulting credit of €138.4 million recognized in net income was eliminated from the calculation of ROCE. The utilization of these tax losses in 2008 and 2009 generated charges of €8.7 million and €29.0 million respectively, which were similarly eliminated from the calculation of ROCE.

(2)

In 2008, the review of the business plan of Veolia Environmental Services Germany, led to the recognition of an impairment charge of €41.9 million in respect of deferred tax assets, which is eliminated from the calculation of ROCE.




116



Back to Contents


Average capital employed during the year is defined as the average of opening and closing capital employed. Capital employed is equal to the sum of net intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, goodwill net of impairment, investments in associates, net operating and non-operating working capital requirements and net derivative instruments less provisions and other non-current debts. Capital employed in 2009 includes the assets of companies classified as assets held for sale as of December 31, 2009. Capital employed is calculated as follows:

(€ million)

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31,2006

As of December 31,2005

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31, 2007

Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, net(1)

14,117.8

11,644.1

10,258.9

14,628.9

14,434.2

13,869.8

Goodwill, net of impairment

6,913.2

5,705.0

4,752.3

6,720.6

6,674.2

6,782.0

Investments in associates

292.1

241.0

201.5

268.5

306.8

290.3

Operating and non-operating working capital requirements, net(2)

(33.2)

198.8

160.8

(182.1)

92.3

3.8

Net derivative instruments and other(3)

79.4

26.9

(66.6)

(70.6)

51.0

79.0

Provisions

(2,964.7)

(3,022.5)

(2,402.0)

(3,063.9)

(2,937.8)

(2,915.9)

Other non-current debt

-

(207.3)

(203.7)

-

 

Capital employed

18,404.6

14,585.0

12,701.2

18,301.4

18,620.7

18,109.0

Clemessy & Crystal (Energy Services Division)

-

35.1

Transportation United Kingdom

-

54.5

94.3

Waste-to-Energy (Environmental Services Division)

-

53.0

48.1

Veolia Freight (Transportation Division)

-

125.0

118.1

Renewable Energies

-

58.8

-

Capital employed published in 2008

-

18,912.0

18,404.6

  

Average capital employed

16,494.8

13,643.1

N/A

18,461.0

18,364.8

 
   

(1)

including the investment in Tianjin Shibei (water division) for €219 million

(2)

including net deferred tax but excluding deferred tax relating to U.S. divestitures and related restructurings (€60.7 million in 2007, €84.9 million in 2006 and €117.6 million in 2005).

(3)

excluding derivatives hedging the fair value of debt for €27.7 million in 2007, €(28.8) million in 2006 and €(161.1) million in 2005.


(1)

Including the investment in Tianjin Shibei (Water Division) for €219 million in 2007.

(2)

Including net deferred assets but excluding deferred taxes relating to U.S. divestitures and associated restructuring (€23.1 million in 2009, €52.0 million in 2008 and €60.7 million in 2007).

(3)

Excluding debt fair value hedging derivatives for €343.2 million in 2009, €371.5 million in 2008 and €(27.7) million in 2007.


(1)

Including the investment in Tianjin Shibei (Water Division) for €219 million in 2007.

(2)

Including net deferred assets but excluding deferred taxes relating to U.S. divestitures and associated restructuring (€23.1 million in 2009, €52.0 million in 2008 and €60.7 million in 2007).

(3)

Excluding debt fair value hedging derivatives for €343.2 million in 2009, €371.5 million in 2008 and €(27.7) million in 2007.


The Group’s return on capital employed (ROCE) is as follows:

(€ million)

Net income from operations

Average capital employed

ROCE

2009

1,403.3

18,461.0

7.6%

2008

1,560.5

18,364.8

8.5%


The decrease in ROCE in 2009 is primarily attributable to trends in operating performance and the economic environment.



97117



Back to Contents


Our return on capitalCapital employed (ROCE) in 2006breaks down by Division and 2007 was determinedcountry as follows:

As of
December 31,
2009

(€ million)

France

Germany

United
Kingdom

Rest of
Europe

United
States

Oceania

Asia

Middle
East

Rest
of the
world

Total

Water

1,141.1

604.3

1,184.3

1,296.2

170.8

12.7

1,399.9

8.7

377.1

6,195.1

Environmental Services

1,656.5

734.3

1,058.6

808.5

1,194.1

282.9

162.5

55.4

152.0

6,104.8

Energy Services

1,044.4

86.3

80.1

2,007.0

589.0

10.6

108.1

16.0

75.8

4,017.3

Transportation

657.9

37.9

(1.0)

468.7

229.2

50.4

43.5

17.0

58.7

1,562.3

Unallocated amounts(1)

(26.4)

-

(67.6)

162.0

275.0

-

-

(0.5)

79.4

421.9

Segment assets

4,473.5

1,462.8

2,254.4

4,742.4

2,458.1

356.6

1,714.0

96.6

743.0

18,301.4


(€ million)

Net income from operations

Average capital employed during the year

ROCE

2007

1,796.6

16,494.8

10.9%

2006

1,468.5

13,643.1

10.8%

As of
December 31,
2008

(€ million)

France

Germany

United
Kingdom

Rest of
Europe

United
States

Oceania

Asia

Middle
East

Rest
of the
world

Total

Water

1,263.0

594.6

1,001.0

1,177.1

200.7

(0.7)

1,393.7

(31.1)

650.0

6,248.3

Environmental Services

1,742.6

804.5

1,032.6

836.7

1,299.6

218.1

173.5

62.7

159.6

6,329.9

Energy Services

1,042.4

92.2

103.7

1,977.3

580.6

9.4

104.0

23.1

66.1

3,998.8

Transportation

586.8

73.6

(0.9)

521.4

251.5

1.5

(4.4)

14.9

44.8

1,489.2

Unallocated amounts(1)

14.1

(0.1)

(72.6)

240.4

310.6

0.1

-

-

62.0

554.5

Segment assets

4,648.9

1,564.8

2,063.8

4,752.9

2,643.0

228.4

1,666.8

69.6

982.5

18,620.7


Change

(€ million)

France

Germany

United
Kingdom

Rest of
Europe

United
States

Oceania

Asia

Middle
East

Rest
of the
world

Total

Water

(121.9)

9.7

183.3

119.1

(29.9)

13.4

6.2

39.8

(272.9)

(53.2)

Environmental Services

(86.1)

(70.2)

26.0

(28.2)

(105.5)

64.8

(11.0)

(7.3)

(7.6)

(225.1)

Energy Services

2.0

(5.9)

(23.6)

29.7

8.4

1.2

4.1

(7.1)

9.7

18.5

Transportation

71.1

(35.7)

(0.1)

(52.7)

(22.3)

48.9

47.9

2.1

13.9

73.1

Unallocated amounts(1)

(40.5)

0.1

5.0

(78.4)

(35.6)

(0.1)

-

(0.5)

17.4

(132.6)

Segment assets

(175.4)

(102.0)

190.6

(10.5)

(184.9)

128.2

47.2

27.0

(239.5)

(319.3)


(1)

 Including holding companies, other central entities and Proactiva.

Unlike income statement line items, ROCE is relatively insensitive

118



Back to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates.   Therefore, ROCE improved slightly in 2007 despite the marked increase in average capital employed as a result of activity growth and acquisitions. This is due to the combined impact of productivity measures, the increased maturity of the contract portfolio, the contribution of companies acquired and the improvement in the income tax expense.Contents


Contractual Obligations

We have various contractual obligations arising from our operations. These obligations are more fully described in this document under various headings in this “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” as well as in the notes to our consolidated financial statements.

The following table lists the aggregate maturities of our long-term debt, operating leases, capital leases and closure and post-closure costs (principally Waste) at December 31, 2007 (in millions of euros):2009:

 

Payments Due by Period

 

(€ million)

Payments Due by Period

Contractual Obligations

Total

Less than
2 years

2 to 5 years

After  5 years

Total

Less than 1 year

2 to 3
years

4 to 5
years

After 5
years

————

————

Long-Term Debt Obligations(1) (2)

16,872.9

3,679.4

3,422.6

9,770.9

19,862.6

2,865.7

2,302.8

3,594.0

11,100.1

Operating Lease Obligations(3)

2,190.0

495.0

1,190.6

504.4

Operating Lease Obligations(1) (2)

2,753.7

567.7

864.5

624.6

696.9

Capital Lease Obligations(3)

1,139.9

172.9

585.3

381.7

991.4

169.8

289.3

174.0

358.3

Closure and post-closure

539.5

60.0

185.3

294.2

————

————

Closure and post-closure(4)

638.3

71.7

107.6

57.5

401.5

Total

20,742.3

4,407.3

5,383.8

10,951.2

24,246.0

3,674.9

3,564.2

4,450.1

12,556.8

=========

=========

  

(1)

Including non current and current borrowings, but excluding capital lease (see (3) below).

(2)

We are also obligated to pay interest on our long-term and other debt obligations. To measure our obligations, we use a tool that we call the “financing rate,” which we define as the ratio between the cost of net debt (equal to finance costs, net, excluding fair value adjustments on financial instruments not qualifying for hedge accounting ) to average net indebtedness (based on a quarterly weighted average, and determined in the manner set forth above under “—Sources of Funds – Financings”). In 2007, the financing rate was 5.49%. A description of the way in which we account for derivative instruments and manage the market risks to which we are exposed is set forth in Note 30 to our consolidated financial statements. After taking into account hedging transactions, 53.6% of our financial debt bears interest at fixed rates. After further taking into account the impact of interest rate caps, this percentage increases to 61.3%. Assuming a constant net debt policy, a 0.5% increase in interest rates would generate an increase in net finance costs of €15 million.

(3)

Corresponds to future minimum lease payments.

(1)

Including non-current and current borrowings, but excluding capital lease obligations (see (3) below).

(2)

We are also obligated to pay interest on our long-term and other debt obligations. To measure our obligations, we use a tool that we call the “financing rate”, which we define as the ratio between the cost of net debt (equal to finance costs, net, excluding fair value adjustments on financial instruments not qualifying for hedge accounting) to average net financial debt (based on a monthly weighted average). In 2009, the financing rate was 4.76%. A description of the way in which we account for derivative instruments and manage the market risks to which we are exposed is set forth in Note 29 to our consolidated financial statements. After taking into account hedging transactions, 51.3% of our financial debt bears interest at fixed rates. Assuming a constant net debt policy, a 0.5% increase in interest rates would generate an increas e in net finance costs of €15 million.

(3)

Corresponds to future minimum lease payments.

(4)

Excluding provisions for environmental risks.

(1)

Including non-current and current borrowings, but excluding capital lease obligations (see (3) below).

(2)

We are also obligated to pay interest on our long-term and other debt obligations. To measure our obligations, we use a tool that we call the “financing rate”, which we define as the ratio between the cost of net debt (equal to finance costs, net, excluding fair value adjustments on financial instruments not qualifying for hedge accounting) to average net financial debt (based on a monthly weighted average). In 2009, the financing rate was 4.76%. A description of the way in which we account for derivative instruments and manage the market risks to which we are exposed is set forth in Note 29 to our consolidated financial statements. After taking into account hedging transactions, 51.3% of our financial debt bears interest at fixed rates. Assuming a constant net debt policy, a 0.5% increase in interest rates would generate an increas e in net finance costs of €15 million.

(3)

Corresponds to future minimum lease payments.

(4)

Excluding provisions for environmental risks.


Off Balance Sheet Arrangements


The following discussion of our material off-balance sheet commitments should be read together with Note 3836 to our consolidated financial statements included herein, which discusses such commitments in greater detail. In the ordinary course of our business, we may enter into various contractual commitments with third parties whichthat are not recorded in our balance sheet. These commitments include, among others, operational guarantees, financial guarantees, obligations to buy or sell and letters of credit given on our part. Operational guarantees constitute the greatest share of these off-balance sheet commitments, which we generally use to guarantee the performance commitments given by our subsidiaries to their customers. Often, these performance commitments are guaranteed by an insurance company or a financial institution, which then requires a counter-guarantee from us.



98



Back to Contents


Specific commitments given

Specific Commitments GivenBerlin contract commitments


Berlin Water Contract

Under the Berlin water contract, the Group may be requiredplans to purchase easement rights of passage for water pipes from landowners. The gross amount of this investment could reach €426 million (50%), approximately €175 million of which would be borneborn by the Berlin Lander, representing a net commitment of €250 million. Inmillion for the eventGroup. Given the uncertain nature of acquisitionestimating these easement rights, this commitment was retained off-balance sheet as of December 31, 2007.

More precise estimates were performed in 2008, valuing the easement at €113 million (100%), including a portion, estimated at €57 million, to be reimbursed by the Berlin Lander. The Group therefore recognized an asset and operating liability of €113 million in the consolidated balance sheet in 2008. As these rights from landowners,vest over the period to 2011, the amounts paid wouldwill be recorded, net of amounts reimbursed by the Berlin Lander, in operating financial assets in the Group balance sheet, net and remunerated underpursuant to the contract.

Agreements with EDF

Veolia Environnement granted EDF a call option covering all of its Dalkia shares in the event that an EDF competitor takes control of the company.our Company. Likewise EDF granted Veolia Environnement a call option covering all of its Dalkia shares, exercisable in the event of a change in the legal status of EDF orand should a Veolia Environnement competitor, acting alone or in concert, take control of EDF. Failing an agreement on the share transfer price, this would be decided by an expert.



119



Back to Contents


Other Commitments Given

Other commitments and contingencies include neither collateral guarantees supporting borrowings (see Note 36 to our consolidated financial statements) nor the specific commitments and contingencies described above. The following table sets forth our other commitments given as of the dates indicated.

    

Maturing in

(€ million)

As of
December 31,
2007

As of
December 31,
2008

As of
December 31,
2009

Less than
1 year

1 to 5
years

More than
5 years

Operational guarantees including performance bonds

5,591.4

6,624.9

6,950.9

2,442.4

2,418.8

2,089,7

Financial guarantees

 835.6

667.5

679.4

229.4

275.8

174.2

Debt guarantees

355.6

303.0

258.3

89.3

113.6

55.4

Vendor warranties given

480.0

364.5

421.1

140.1

162.2

118.8

Commitments given

617.1

507.8

431.6

283.7

97.6

50.3

Purchase commitments

589.9

476.5

425.1

277.8

97.6

49.7

Sales commitments

27.2

31.3

6.5

5.9

-

0.6

Other commitments given

957.3

912.7

1,065.3

489.4

267.2

308.7

Letters of credit

573.8

706.7

604.5

329.1

152.1

123.3

Other commitments given

383.5

206.0

460.8

160.3

115.1

185.4

Other commitments given

8,001.4

8,712.9

9,127.2

3,444.9

3,059.4

2,622.9


The following is a breakdown of the off-balance sheettable breaks down our other commitments given (other than the specific commitments described above)by Division as of the end of 2006December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2007:2009:

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31,2007

Water

6,036.4

5,891.8

4,368.3

Environmental Services

831.1

901.7

1,171.1

Energy Services

700.3

538.1

755.7

Transportation

533.2

415.8

398.3

Proactiva

45.2

50.6

39.8

Holding companies

942.0

891.3

1,241.5

Other

39.0

23.6

26.7

Total

9,127.2

8,712.9

8,001.4


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2007

Maturity (at year-end 2007)

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Operational guarantees including performance bonds

4,043.6

5,591.4

852.9

2,588.4

2,150.1

Financial guarantees

 

 

   

Debt guarantees

300.7

355.6

128.3

153.9

73.4

Vendor warranties given

448.6

480.0

140.6

198.0

141.4

Commitments given

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase commitments

149.3

589.9

445.0

109.1

35.8

Sales commitments

31.3

27.2

9.8

15.4

2.0

Letters of credit

904.5

573.8

327.7

241.1

5.0

Other commitments given

749.8

383.5

177.0

74.3

132.2

Total

6,627.8

8,001.4

2,081.3

3,380.2

2,539.9



The following is a breakdown of such commitments by division:


(€ million)

As of December  31,
 2007

As of December 31,  2006

Water

4,368.3

3,253.2

Environmental Services

1,171.1

876.7

Energy Services

755.7

543.0

Transportation

398.3

294.9

Proactiva

39.8

5.7

Holding companies

1,241.5

1,598.3

Other

26.7

56.0

Total

8,001.4

6,627.8


Our commitments increased most significantly in the Water division in 2007, primarily as a result of new construction contracts won in the Middle East and Australia and the impact of new acquisitions during the year.




99120



Back to Contents


ITEM 6: 6.

DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT

Our company has beenCompany is asociété anonyme à conseil d’administration, which is a French corporation with a single boardBoard of directors, since its general shareholders’ meeting held on April 30, 2003.Directors. Our shares are listed on Euronext Paris by NYSE Euronext and, in the form of American Depository Shares, on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). We are subject to French regulations, in particular relating to corporate governance, and to regulations applicable to foreign companies listed in the United States.

See “Item 16G. Corporate Governance” for a summary of significant ways in which our corporate governance practices differ from those followed by NYSE listed companies.

Board of Directors

Our boardBoard of directorsDirectors has adopted an internal charter, as well as internal charters for the accountsAccounts and audit committeeAudit Committee, the Nominations and Compensation Committee and the nominationsStrategic Research, Innovation and compensation committee,Sustainable Development Committee, respectively. The purpose of these charters was initially to apply the recommendations of the report of a French working group chaired by Mr. Daniel Bouton relating to the improvement of corporate governance practices in French public companies (known as the “Bouton report”).

The internal rules and regulations of the Accounts and Audit Committee were amended by our Board of Directors at its meeting on March 24, 2009 to take into account the order (ordonnance) of December 8, 2008 that transposed the eighth directive on statutory audits of corporate financial statements into French law.

Pursuant to French law, our Company is required to refer to a corporate governance code and to comply with the provisions of such code or to declare the provisions it does not comply with and the reasons for which it decided not to apply such provisions. At its meeting of January 7, 2009, our Board of Directors reviewed the consolidated version of the AFEP-MEDEF code of December 2008 (a code of recommended practices for governance and executive compensation that is widely used in France) (the “AFEP-MEDEF Code”) and confirmed that this code was consistent with our existing corporate governance practices. We believe that our practices conform to standard corporate governance practices in France.the provisions of the AFEP-MEDEF Code that our Company has decided to apply.

Composition and appointment of the Board of Directors

Our company’s boardAs of the date hereof, the Board of Directors has fifteen members. The list of directors, must have between 3the expiration date of their terms of office and 18 members, unless otherwise provided under applicable law. Each director must own at least 750other personal information about them is set forth below. A change in the composition of the Company’s shares in registered form.  Each director is electedBoard of Directors will be proposed to the general shareholders’ meeting on May 7, 2010 comprising the appointment of two new directors, the ratification of one interim appointment and the appointment of one “censeur” (non-voting member). (see Item 8: “Financial Information Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information – Significant Changes”, below).

From among the directors who are individuals, the Board elects a Chairman and, if required, a Vice-Chairman, for a term of office not to exceed their terms of office as directors. The members of the Board of Directors are appointed by the shareholders at an ordinary general shareholders’ meeting forpursuant to a six-year term, based onproposal made by the nominationsBoard of the board of directors,Directors, which in turnitself receives proposals from the nominationsNominations and compensation committee. The board of directors elects a chairman and, if necessary, one or two vice-chairmen, for a term which cannot exceed the terms of office of such individuals’ terms as directors.

Our directors canCompensation Committee. Directors may be removed from office at any time by a majority votedecision of a general shareholders’ meeting. Each director must own at least 750 registered shares of the shareholders.  Company.

The boardCompany’s Board of directorsDirectors does not currently include any members elected by the employees or any deputy directorsnon-voting members (censeurs); however,. However, a representative of the Company’s works council participates in board(comité d’entreprise) is entitled to attend Board of Directors’ meetings in a consultativenon-voting, advisory capacity.

The termsA Frenchsociété anonyme(corporation) with a Board of half of our directors (or, if we have an uneven number of directors, half plus one additional director) are subjectDirectors may choose to for renewal every three years on a rolling basis.  The board of directors currently consists of 14 members.  

In accordance with these provisions,separate the combined general shareholders’ meeting of May 11, 2006 renewed  the terms of six membersduties of the board of directors.  In addition, a new member was elected during this meeting. Their terms will now be subject to renewal based on seniority of appointment.  Accordingly, the terms of seven members will expire at the end of the shareholders’ general meeting called to approve the financial statements for the 2008 fiscal year,Chairman and the termsChief Executive Officer or have a single person hold these positions. As stated in the AFEP-MEDEF corporate governance code, the law does not favor either possibility, and it is the Board of the remaining seven membersDirectors’ prerogative to choose between these two methods of the board of directors will expire at the end of the general shareholders’ meeting called to approve the financial statements for the 2011 fiscal year.  

Evaluation of the independence of directors

To qualify as “independent” under the board of directors’ charter, a director must not have any relations with our company, its subsidiaries or itsexecutive management, that might impair his or her objective judgment.  The board of directors’ charter sets forth in detail the independence criteria that each director must satisfy, which are baseddepending on the recommendationsspecific requirements of each company.

When the Bouton report discussed above.

The boardarticles of directors’ charter does, however, provideincorporation were amended on April 30, 2003, thereby converting the Company into a certain measurecompany with a Board of flexibility with respect toDirectors, the applicationBoard of these criteria: the board of directors may, for example, deem that one of its members is independent in light of the specific facts and circumstances of that member, even if that member fails to meet all of the independence criteria set forth in the charter; conversely, the board may consider that one of its members should not be declared independent even though he meets the charter's independence criteria.

The board of directors’ charter also providesDirectors had decided that the board must evaluate on an annual basis and prior to publicationduties of the Company’s reference document, the independence of each of its members.  This evaluation must take into account the independence rules set forth in its charter, the particular facts and circumstances involved and the conclusions providedChief Executive Officer would be performed by the Company’s nominationsChairman of the Board of Directors. However, on November 2, 2009, the Board of Directors decided, effective November 27, 2009, to separate the positions of Chief Executive Officer and compensation committee.Chairman of the Board of Directors.



100121



Back to Contents


After receiving the conclusionsChairman of the nominationsBoard of Directors

The appointment of Mr. Henri Proglio as Chairman and compensation committee, our boardChief Executive Officer of directors proceeded with its annual evaluationEDF led the Board to conduct an in-depth review of changes to be made to the Company’s governance from October to November 2009. The Board decided that it was in the interest of the independenceCompany and its shareholders to maintain continuity and stability vis-à-vis its customers and employees by retaining Mr. Henri Proglio as Chairman of the Board of Veolia Environnement, while separating this position from that of Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Proglio has informed our company that he intends to remain in this position through 2010, and that he will resign from this position at the end of 2010.

Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors (Senior independent director)

On October 21, 2009, the Board of Directors decided to create the position of Vice-Chairman to assist the Chairman in carrying out his duties of ensuring the proper functioning of the Company’s governance bodies, similar to the British concept of the senior independent director. In accordance with the Board’s internal rules and regulations, the Vice-Chairman is appointed from among the directors considered to be independent, for the duration of his term of office as an independent director. The Board appointed Louis Schweitzer, an independent director, to this position of Vice-Chairman, effective November 27, 2009.

Powers of the Board of Directors

In accordance with French law, the Board of Directors establishes the policies concerning the Company’s business and supervises the implementation thereof. Subject to the powers expressly granted by law to shareholders’ meetings and within the limits of the corporate purposes, the Board of Directors has the authority to consider all issues concerning the proper operation of the Company and, by its deliberations, resolves matters which concern the Board.

In addition to the powers conferred on the Board of Directors by French law, its internal rules and regulations impose an internal requirement that certain major decisions of the Chief Executive Officer be submitted for the Board of Directors’ prior approval. These internal limitations of authority are described below in the paragraphs concerning management.

Board Members

The following table sets forth the names and ages of the current members of our Board of Directors, the date of their first appointment, or renewal, as the case may be, to the Board and the date of expiration of their current term and their current principal business activities conducted outside of our Company. All positions and offices of our directors indicated below are given as of January 31, 2010. Unless otherwise stated, all terms of office shall expire at the general shareholders’ meeting for the year stated.

Pursuant to the recommendation of our Nominations and Compensation Committee, our Board of Directors at its meeting of March 24, 2010, decided to propose to the general shareholders’ meeting of May 7, 2010 the appointment of Mr. Antoine Frérot as director of our Company. Mr. Frérot joined Compagnie Générale des Eaux in 1990. He became Chief Executive Officer of CGEA Transport in 1995. In 2000, Mr Frérot became Chief Executive Officer of CONNEX, the Transport Division of Vivendi Environnemnt and a member of the Executive Committee of Vivendi Environnement. In January 2003, Antoine Frérot was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Eau, the Water Division of Veolia Environnement, and executive vice president of Veolia Environnement. Since November 2009, he has been the Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Environnement. Moreover, the general shareho lders’ meeting of May 7, 2010 will vote on March 29, 2007.  Atthe appointment, as a member of the Board on Directors, of Groupement Industriel Marcel Dassaut, French joint stock company (SAS), whose first permanent representative will be its Deputy Managing Director Mr. Olivier Costa de Beauregard. This shareholders’ meeting will also vote on the appointment of one “censeur” (supervisory non-voting member), Thierry Dassault. (see Item 8: “Financial Information Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information – Significant Changes”, below) In addition, this meeting will vote on the boardratification of directors qualifiedthe appointment and renewal of the term of Esther Koplowitz. During its meeting held on December 17, 2009 the Board of Directors appointed Ms. Koplowitz with effect from January 1, 2010 in replacement of Murray Stuart who decided to retire from the Board. Ms. Koplowitz was a member of Veolia Environnement’s Supervisory Board from 2000 to 2002 and is currently Chairman of the Board of Directors and majority shareholder inFomento de Construcciones y Contratas (FCC).

Directors may be contacted at our headquarters, located at 36/38 avenue Kléber, 75116 Paris.



122



Back to Contents




Henri Proglio

Age 60

Date of first appointment:

4/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/07/2009

Expiration of term:

2013

Principal Function within our Company:

Chairman of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Electricité de France (EDF)


Louis Schweitzer*

Age 67

Date of first appointment:

4/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/07/2009

Expiration of term:

2011

Principal Function within our Company:

Director and Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Nominations and Compensation Committee since April 30, 2003

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman of the Board of Directors of AstraZeneca (UK)

Chairman of the Board of Directors of AB Volvo (Sweden)


Jean Azéma*

Age 57

Date of first appointment:

4/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/07/2009

Expiration of term:

2011

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive Officer of Groupama SA


Daniel Bouton*

Age 59

Date of first appointment:

4/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/11/2006

Expiration of term:

2010

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Nominations and Compensation Committee since April 1, 2005

Member of the Accounts and Audit Committee since November 2, 2009 and Chairman of this Committee since January 1, 2010.

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman of the Board of Directors ofDMJB Conseil

Senior Advisor ofRothschild &Cie Banque


Jean-François Dehecq*

Age 70

Date of first appointment:

05/11/2006

Expiration of term:

2010

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman of the Board of Directors of Sanofi-Aventis




123



Back to Contents




Pierre-André de Chalendar*

Age 51

Date of first appointment:

05/07/2009

Expiration of Term:

2011

Principal position held within the Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Accounts and Audit Committee since May 7, 2009

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive Officer of Compagnie de Saint-Gobain


Augustin de Romanet de Beaune*

Age 48

Date of first appointment:

03/29/2007

Renewal of term :05/07/2009

Expiration of term:

2013

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive Officer of Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations


Jean-Marc Espalioux*

Age 58

Date of first appointment:

04/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/11/2006

Expiration of term:

2010

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Accounts and Audit Committee since April 30, 2003

Member of the Strategic Research, Innovation and Sustainable Development Committee since September 14, 2006

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Financière Agache Private Equity

Advisor to Permira (Investment Fund)


Paul-Louis Girardot*

Age 76

Date of first appointment:

04/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/11/2006

Expiration of term:

2010

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Accounts and Audit Committee since April 1, 2005

Member of the Strategic Research, Innovation and Sustainable Development Committee since September 14, 2006

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Veolia Eau – Compagnie Générale des Eaux


Esther Koplowitz*

Date of first appointment (to replace Murray Stuart, pursuant to a decision of the Board of Directors on December 17, 2009 and subject to ratification by the General Shareholders Meeting to be held on May 7, 2010):

01/01/2010

Expiration of term:

2014 (subject to ratification by the General Shareholders Meeting to be held on May 7, 2010)

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

President of the Esther Koplowitz Foundation

Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors ofFomento de Construcciones y Contratas(F.C.C.) (representing B-1998 SL)




124



Back to Contents




Philippe Kourilsky

Age 67

Date of first appointment:

04/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/07/2009

Expiration of term:

2013

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Chairman of the Strategic Research, Innovation And Sustainable Development Committee since September 14, 2006

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Professor at the Collège de France.

Member of the Académie des Sciences.


Serge Michel

Age 83

Date of first appointment:

04/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/11/2006

Expiration of term:

2010

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Chairman of the Nominations and Compensation Committee since April 30,2003

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman of Soficot SAS


Baudouin Prot*

Age 58

Date of first appointment:

04/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/07/2009

Expiration of term:

2011

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Director and Chief Executive Officer of BNP Paribas


Georges Ralli

Age 61

Date of first appointment:

04/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/11/2006

Expiration of term:

2010

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive of European Investment Banking Business of Lazard Group LLC (USA)

Chief Executive Officer Vice President and Managing Partner of Lazard Frères Gestion SAS


Paolo Scaroni*

Age 63

Date of first appointment:

12/12/2006

Renewal of term :05/07/2009

Expiration of term:

2013

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive Officer of ENI (Italy)


*

Independent directors.




125



Back to Contents


Henri Proglio is a graduate of the Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales (HEC). He joined Compagnie Générale des Eaux in 1972 and was appointed Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of CGEA in 1990. He was appointed Executive Vice-President of Vivendi Universal and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Vivendi Water in 1999. He became Chairman of Veolia Environnement’s Management Board in 2000 and Chairman of the Board of Directors and was Chief Executive Officer from April 2003 to November 27, 2009, on which date he was appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement following his appointment as independentChairman and Managing Director of Messrs.Electricité de France (EDF) by decree of the President of the French Republic issued during the Ministerial Council meeting of November 25, 2009.

Louis Schweitzer is a graduate of the Institut d’Etudes Politiques (IEP) in Paris and of the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA) and was a financial controller in the Treasury department. From 1981 to 1986, he was chief of staff for Laurent Fabius (who was successively junior Budget Minister, Minister for Industry and Research and Prime Minister). In 1986, he joined Renault’s senior management and then successively held the positions of director of planning and management control, Chief Finance Officer and Executive Vice-President. He was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Renault in December 1990, then Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in May 1992 until April 29, 2005, when he was appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors of Renault. Louis Schweitzer did not wish to seek the renewal of his term of office as Director of Renault during the annu al general meeting held on May 6, 2009. He was appointed Vice Chairman of the Veolia Environnement Board of Directors on November 27, 2009.

Jean Azéma holds an engineering degree from the Ecole Supérieure d’Agriculture de Purpan (ESAP), as well as a degree from the Centre National d’Etudes Supérieures de Sécurité Sociale (CNESS). He began his career at Union Départementale de la Mutualité Agricole des Pyrénées Orientales in 1975, moved to the Centre National d’Etudes Supérieures de la Sécurité Sociale from 1978 to 1979, and to the Union Départementale de la Mutualité Agricole of Allier from 1979 to 1987. From 1987 to 1995, Mr. Azéma Bouton, Dehecq, Espalioux, Prot, Scaroni, Schweitzerserved as financial director of Groupama Vie, investments director for Groupama, account management and Stuart.  The boardconsolidation director at Caisse Centrale des Assurances Mutuelles Agricoles (CCAMA) and insurance director at CCAMA. In 1996, he was appointed Chief Executive Officer of directors postponed the independence evaluationGroupama Sud-Ou est, in 1998, Chief Executive Officer of Groupama Sud and in June 2000, Chief Executive Officer of Groupama. Jean Azéma is currently Chief Executive Officer of Groupama SA and of Fédération Nationale Groupama, Chairman of the newlyFédération Française des Sociétés d’Assurance Mutuelles and deputy Chairman of Fédération Française des Sociétés d’Assurance.

Daniel Bouton holds a degree in political science, is a graduate of the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA) and is a former financial controller in the Treasury department. He has held a number of positions in the French Ministry of Economy, Finance and Industry, including that of budget director, between 1988 and 1991. In 1991, he began working at Société Générale, serving as Chief Executive Officer starting in 1993, and as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer starting in 1997. He was appointed Mr.to the position of Chairman of the Board of Directors of Société Générale in May 2008, then resigned from his duties of Director and President of the bank in May 2009. In November 2009, Daniel Bouton incorporated a consulting company, DMJB Conseil, of which he is the President.

Jean-François Dehecq is a graduate of the Ecole Nationale des Arts et Métiers. After having been a mathematics teacher from 1964 to 1965 at the Saint-Vincent de Senlis Catholic high school, he became a scientific research intern in the army’s nuclear propulsion department. In 1965, he joined the Société Nationale des Pétroles d’Aquitaine (SNPA, which later became Elf Aquitaine). After four years in the economics department (1965 to 1969), he became executive assistant (1969 to 1970), and then operations engineer (1970 to 1971) at the Lacq plant, a major gas production site in France. In 1973, he became Chief Executive Officer of Sanofi, a major division of Elf Aquitaine. From 1982 to 1988, he was deputy Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Sanofi before assuming full management authority in February 1988. In 1999, he became Chairma n and Chief Executive Officer of Sanofi Synthelabo and, in 2004, organized the Sanofi-Aventis merger. Since 2007, Jean-François Dehecq has been the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Sanofi-Aventis.

Pierre-André de Chalendar is a graduate of ESSEC and the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA). He holds the rank of Government Finance Inspector. In November 1989, he joined Compagnie de Saint Gobain where he held various positions, before being appointed Deputy Chief Executive Officer in May 2005, Director in June 2006 then Chief Executive Officer of Compagnie de Saint Gobain since June 2007.



126



Back to Contents


Augustin de Romanet de Beaune.

As for our existing relationships with Société Générale and BNP Paribas, of which Messrs. Daniel Bouton and Baudoin Prot are, respectively, chairman and chief executive officer and chief executive officer, the board of directors deemed that the Company’s solid financial situation, its independence from bank financing and the limited significanceBeaune is a graduate of the Company’s commitments to these banks allowed it to qualify these board members as independent within the board of directors.  

On March 25, 2008, upon recommendation from the nominationsInstitut d’Etudes Politiques (IEP) in Paris and compensation committee, the board of directors conducted a new evaluation of the independence of its members and concluded that it would renewEcole Nationale d’Administration (ENA). He began his career in the qualification as independentbudget department of the directors above. Additionally, it qualifiedFrench Ministry of Economy and Finance. In 1990, he was a finance attaché with France’s permanent mission to the European Community in Brussels, before returning to the budget department in 1993 as independent Mr. Ralli, duehead of the budgetary analysis and policy office. In 1995, he became a technical advisor in the office of the Minister of the Economy and Finance, and then chief of staff to the junior Budget Minister. After having been a lackbudgetary advisor to the deputy Budget Minister, government press secretary and project leader with the French Ministry of a significant missions being awarded by the CompanyEconomy and Finance from 1995 to Lazard in 2007, Mr.1997, Augustin de Romanet de Beaune taking into accountbecame deputy director and project leader with the public interest investment role thatoffice of the budget director, then deputy director charged with the transportation sector in the budget department. In 1999 and 2000, he was successively appointed manager of Oddo et Compagnie and managing partner of Oddo Pinatton Corporate. In 2002, Augustin de Romanet de Beaune was appointed to the position of chief of staff of the deputy Budget and Budgetary Reform Minister and deputy chief of staff of the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Industry. From 2004 to 2005, he held the positions of chief of staff of the Minister of Employment, Labor and Social Cohesion, deputy chief of staff of the Prime Minister and deputy Secretary General to the Presidency of the Republic. After having been finance and strategy vice-president and a member of the Executive Committee of the Crédit Agricole Group since October 2006, Augustin de Romanet de Beaune was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations playsin March 2007.

Jean-Marc Espalioux holds degrees in political science, law and economics and is an alumnus of the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA). He was a financial controller in the Treasury department from 1978 to 1983. He joined Compagnie Générale des Eaux in 1984, becoming Chief Finance Officer in 1987 and Executive Vice-President in 1996. Jean-Marc Espalioux was a director of the Accor group from 1987 to 1996 and Chairman of the management board from 1997 to 2006. Jean-Marc Espalioux has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Financière Agache Private Equity since July 2006.

Paul-Louis Girardot was a director and Chief Executive Officer of Vivendi until 1998. He focused principally on developing the Veolia Environnement Group’s utilities concessions, particularly in the Water sector. In addition, he contributed significantly to Vivendi’s activities in the telephone sector, in particular mobile telephones. He also worked to expand the Veolia Environnement Group’s business in the Energy Services sector and in the decentralized production of electric power (cogeneration), through the Dalkia subsidiary. Paul-Louis Girardot has been Chairman of the supervisory board of Veolia Eau-Compagnie Générale des Eaux since 2001.

Ms. Esther Koplowitz (Marquise de Casa Peñalver) is the President of the Esther Koplowitz Foundation, which she created herself. Exclusively financed by contributions from its founder, the Esther Koplowitz Foundation is intended, firstly, to provide social and healthcare assistance to seniors, to the physically and mentally handicapped, to minors, and to people with problems of social integration or threatened with exclusion for physical, social or cultural reasons and, secondly, to support research. Since the time of its creation, the Esther Koplowitz Foundation has donated more than EUR 100 million, mainly devoted to building and fitting out homes for the elderly and underprivileged suffering from severe physical or mental handicaps (seven centers) and to the creation of a the Esther Koplowitz Biomedical Research Center (CIBEK by its French acronym), which aspir es to set the standard in its field in Spain. In recognition of her commitment to the social and humanitarian sectors and to research funding, Ms. Koplowitz, a Spanish business leader, has won numerous awards, including the Grand Cross of Civil Merit from the Spanish government, The Golden Cross of the Civil Order of Social Solidarity, from Her Majesty the Queen of Spain, the Blanquerna Prize, from the regional government of Catalonia, the Arms of the City of Barcelona, the title of Honorary Citizen of the City of Valencia; the Silver Medal of the Valencian Council of Culture; the Gold Medal of the Regional Community of Madrid; the Grand Cross of Health of Madrid; the Imserso Infante Cristina Prize for Social Merit in 2008; the Gold and Diamond Insignia of the Foundation of the Orphans of the Spanish National Police Force; the Montblanc Prize for the best company manager of 2004; and, finally, the Business Leader of the Year Award, granted by the US-Spain Chamber of Commerce in 2007. Member of the supervisor y board of Veolia Environnement from 2000 to 2002, Ms. Koplowitz is also vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chairman of the strategic committee and majority shareholder of the Spanish company Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas (FCC) specializing in environmental services, renewable energies, infrastructures and cement. She is also Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors of Cementos Portland Valderrivas, member of the Board of Directors of WRG (U.K.), ASA (Austria) and Alpine (Austria), as well as Chairman of the Board of Directors of B-1998, S.L. For several years now, Veolia Environnement and F.C.C. have jointly held a subsidiary, Proactiva Medio Ambiente S.A., present in Latin America.

Philippe Kourilsky is a graduate of the Ecole Polytechnique, and holds a doctorate in sciences from the University of Paris. He has devoted his career to life sciences research. He has held numerous management positions in the public and private research sectors, and in particular was the Director of Research at the CNRS and Director General of the Institut Pasteur from 2000 to 2005. Philippe Kourilsky is currently a professor at the Collège de France, a member of the Académie des Sciences and holds honorary doctorates from several foreign universities.



127



Back to Contents


Serge Michel has spent his entire career in the construction and public works sector. After having held the position of Executive Vice-President with the Compagnie de Saint-Gobain group and been Chairman of Socea, he chaired the SGE group until 1991 and the CISE group until 1997. He was Executive Vice-President of the Compagnie Générale des Eaux until 1992. He is currently Chairman of Soficot, a business management and investment consulting company he founded in 1997.

Baudouin Prot is a graduate of the Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales (HEC) and of the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA). From 1974 to 1983, he was successively the deputy to the prefect of the Franche-Comté region, financial controller in the Treasury department and deputy to the energy and raw materials director general in the Ministry of Industry. He joined Banque Nationale de Paris in 1983, where he held various positions before being appointed Executive Vice-President in 1992 and Chief Executive Officer in 1996. After having been appointed director and Executive Vice-President of BNP Paribas in March 2000, he has been a director and Chief Executive Officer of BNP Paribas since June 2003.

Georges Ralli holds a graduate degree (DESS) in banking and finance from the University of Paris-V and is a graduate of the Institut d’Etudes Politiques (IEP) in Paris and of the Institut Commercial in Nancy. In 1970, he joined Crédit Lyonnais, where he held various management positions until 1981. In 1982, he served as secretary of the Savings Development and Protection Commission. From 1982 to 1985, he headed the financial negotiations department of Crédit du Nord. He joined Lazard in 1986, and became managing partner in 1993 and jointly headed the mergers and acquisitions department of Lazard LLC starting in 1999. Since 2000, Georges Ralli has been Deputy Chairman and a member of the Executive Committee of Lazard LLC (United States). Since 2006, he has been the Co-Chairman of the European Investment Banking Committee of the Lazard Group LLC (United St ates) and a member of the European Advisory Board. He was head of Maison française from 2006 to 2009. He currently manages the European M&A activities (Chairman of Maison Lazard) and Asset Management activities (President of Lazard Frères Gestion).

Paolo Scaroni holds a degree in economics from Bocconi University in Milan and an MBA from Columbia Business School in New York. After having spent a year with McKinsey & Company following his MBA, between 1973 and 1985, he held various positions with Saint Gobain, ultimately heading the “flat glass” division. In 1985, Paolo Scaroni became Chief Executive Officer of Techint, while at the same time holding the positions of deputy Chairman of Falck and Executive Vice-President of SIV, a joint venture between Techint and Pilkington plc. He became Chief Executive Officer of Pilkington plc in 1996, a position he held until May 2002. He was Chief Executive Officer of Enel from 2002 to 2005 and in June 2005 became Chief Executive Officer of Eni, a position he still holds.

Evaluation of the independence of directors

As defined by the Board of Directors’ internal rules and regulations, an independent director is a director who does not have any relationship with the Company, its Group or its management that could compromise his ability to exercise his judgment objectively. The criteria in the internal rules and regulations for determining directors’ independence are in accordance with the recommendations of the AFEP-MEDEF corporate governance code.

These criteria are evaluated and weighted by the Board of Directors, which can determine that despite the fact that a director does not meet the criteria set forth in the internal rules and regulations, a director can nevertheless be considered to be independent in light of his specific situation or that of the Company, taking into account its shareholders or any other reason. Conversely, the Board of Directors can determine that a director is not independent despite the fact that he meets the criteria set forth in the internal rules and regulations.

The internal rules and regulations also require that, each year, before the publication of the reference document, the Board of Directors evaluate the independence of each of its members on the basis of the criteria contained in said rules and regulations, specific circumstances, the positions of the relevant director, the Company and the Group and the opinion of the Nominations and Compensation Committee.

After reviewing the opinion of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, at its meeting of March 24, 2010, the Board of Directors conducted its annual evaluation of the directors’ independence. Based on this evaluation, the Board considered the following directors to be independent: Jean Azéma, Daniel Bouton, Pierre-André de Chalendar, Jean-François Dehecq, Augustin de Romanet de Beaune, Jean-Marc Espalioux, Paul-Louis Girardot, Baudouin Prot, Paolo Scaroni, Louis Schweitzer and Esther Koplowitz.



128



Back to Contents


With regard to the banking relationships between Veolia Environnement and BNP Paribas, of which Baudouin Prot is a director and Chief Executive Officer, the Board of Directors considered that Veolia Environnement’s solid financial position, the fact that it does not rely on bank financing and the Company’s limited stake in that bank’s business activities enabled it to consider that Baudouin Prot is an independent director on the Company’s Board. Augustin de Romanet de Beaune was deemed to be independent due to the fact that Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations has been charged with making investments that are of public benefit, in particular in the environmental services sector in particular, and, finally, Mr.sector. Lastly, Paul-Louis Girardot taking into accountwas deemed to be independent due to the time that has lapsedelapsed since he was CEOleft his position as Chief Executive Officer of the leadingformer lead company of what is now the water division.  However, Mr. Romanet de Beaune may beWater Division. The other directors deemed not to be independent underdo not have any business relations with the standards set forth in Rule 10A-3 of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.Company, or do not have significant business relations that are likely to compromise their ability to exercise their judgment objectively.

Accordingly, our boardBoard of directorsDirectors has 11eleven independent members as of the date of filing of this annual report on Form 20-F.

Compensation

Directors may be compensated in one of two ways: directors'directors’ fees paid for attending meetings of our boardBoard of directorsDirectors (jetons de présence), which are set by our company’sCompany’s annual shareholders’ meeting, and whose allocation is determined by our boardBoard of directorsDirectors pursuant to recommendations of the nominationsNominations and compensation committee,Compensation Committee, and exceptional compensation, which may be awarded by the boardBoard of directorsDirectors under conditions set by law.

The €770,000 budget foramount of directors’ fees approved bypaid in 2009 and their division between the combined shareholders’ meeting on May 11, 2006, has not been modified.members of the Board of Directors are described and detailed in a table under “Compensation – Board of Directors Compension”. No exceptional compensation was awarded to directors in 2007.2009.

Operations and activity in 20072009

The chairman of our board of directors organizes and supervises the work of the board, the substance of which he then reports to shareholders.  The chairman is also responsible for supervising the Company’s corporate bodies and, in particular, ensuring that directors are able to carry out their duties.  

Directors may participate in boardBoard deliberations throughby videoconference or telecommunication.1 Theyother means of telecommunications, in accordance with the requirements of Articles L. 225-37 and R. 225-21 of the French Commercial Code and as provided by the internal rules and regulations of the Board of Directors. In such case, directors are deemed present for purposesthe purpose of calculating the quorum and majority, requirements when participating through such means, except with respectregard to the vote on certain major decisions as provided for by law (e.g., establishment of annual statutory and consolidated financial statements andby the Board’s internal rules (in particular, the preparation of the annual financial statements, the management report)report and the consolidated financial statements). This option was used on seven occasions during boardat ten Board meetings in 2007.2009 (compared with four meetings in 2008).

The charterAccording to its internal rules and regulations, the Company’s Board of our board of directors requires the board of directorsDirectors is required to meet at least four times per year. During the 20072009 fiscal year, the board of directorsBoard met elevenfourteen times including four special meetings devoted(compared to discussing strategic acquisitions and the launching of a capital increaseseven times in cash with preservation of shareholders’ preferential subscription rights, which was completed on July 10, 2007.

2008). On average, boardBoard meetings last approximatelylasted two hours, which allowsthereby allowing for a thorough examination and discussion of the itemsmatters of business on the agenda. The average attendance levelrate at boardBoard meetings in 20072009 was 77.9%85.9% (compared to 80.6% in 2008).

1 Under conditions set forth in Articles L.225-37 and R.225-21In 2009, the Board of Directors was regularly informed of the French Commercial Code. This ability is providedGroup’s financial situation and monitored the sale of assets program and the efficiency plan set up notably as a result of the deterioration of the position of the Environmental Services Division at the end of the 2008 fiscal year. Furthermore, during the second six months of the year, the Board met regularly in order to conduct an in-depth review of changes to be made to the Company’s governance in light of the appointment of Mr. Henri Proglio as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of EDF and to discuss his replacement as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. On issues of corporate governance, the Board’s work focused, in particular, on the adoption and implementation of the AFEP-MEDEF code, as amended in 2008, the termination of the employment contract of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer an d then of the Chief Executive Officer, the separation of the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and providing termination compensation to the Chief Executive Officer, the creation of the position of Vice-Chairman, setting the compensation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and, then, of the Chairman and of the Chief Executive Officer individually after this position was separated into two positions, the corporate officer’s compensation policy and the examination of the Executive Committee’s one, evaluating the independence of directors, evaluating internal controls and approving the Chairman’s report, distributing directors’ fees to directors and revising the rules for indistributing the variable portion of directors’ fees and revising the internal rules and regulations of the boardBoard and of directors, which allows board membersits Committees.

In 2009, the Board of Directors’ other activities also focused on the following matters: the budget, the annual and semi-annual financial statements, obtaining information on the financial statements for the first and third quarters, the Group’s financing policy, the resolutions to participate in board meetings by videoconferencebe submitted to the annual combined general shareholders’ meeting, giving its opinion on the Company’s policy with regard to incentive plans for the Group’s managers and any other manner permitted by applicable law.corporate officers (stock options, free shares), a capital increase reserved to employees, granting financial and legal authorizations to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and to the Chief Executive Officer and the renewal thereof. The Board examined the Group’s significant transactions and, when necessary, granted the required authorizations.



101129



Back to Contents


In 2007, in addition to providing legal and financial authorizations, the board of directors primarily addressed the following subjects, among others: corporate governance (evaluation of board members’ independence, chairman and chief executive officer compensation and distribution of directors’ fees, co-opting of a director, formal evaluation of the board and the management, modification of the board’s internal charter), annual and half-year financial statements, the capital increase completed in 2007, approval of significant financial and external growth transactions, evaluation of internal audit and chairman’s report, defining our Company’s policies on incentives for executives and managers of the Group (stock options, free shares), the stock option plan and granting of free shares in 2007, employee savings plans and share capital increase reserved for employees (Group Savin gs Plan), and the consolidated 2008 budget. In addition, the board of directors devoted one meeting to an in-depth review of our Group’s strategy, in the form of a presentation and analysis of the long-term plan, in which the four general managers of the divisions participated

Board EvaluationMembers

Under our charter, our board of directors is required to evaluate its work annually, with the goal of improving its efficiency, verifying that important matters are adequately prepared and discussed during board meetings and to assess the contributions made by each board member.

In addition, our board’s internal charter provides that a formal evaluation of its operations must occur every three years, which may take place under the supervision of an independent director and, if necessary, an outside consultant. The purpose of this formal evaluation is meant to verify that our board is conducting its work in accordance with its charter, and to identify ways in which operations and performance can be improved.

The first formal evaluation occurred duringfollowing table sets forth the first quarter of 2004, with the preliminary analysis being conducted under the supervisionnames and ages of the chairmancurrent members of our Board of Directors, the nominations and compensation committee. A detailed questionnaire and individual interviews with directors serveddate of their first appointment, or renewal, as the basiscase may be, to the Board and the date of expiration of their current term and their current principal business activities conducted outside of our Company. All positions and offices of our directors indicated below are given as of January 31, 2010. Unless otherwise stated, all terms of office shall expire at the general shareholders’ meeting for the preliminary analysis,year stated.

Pursuant to the results of which were presented in detail and debated at the board of directors’ meeting held on June 22, 2004.  During the same meeting, our board of directors also evaluated the performancerecommendation of our company’s management based on the nominationsNominations and compensation committee’s report. The operationsCompensation Committee, our Board of the board of directors, its committees and our company’s executive management was considered to be satisfactory over all by our directors.  However, certain areas were targeted for improvement.  These areas included developing more information and exchanges about our group’s operating activities, obtaining additional information related to competition, human resources policies and research and development, and increasing the frequency information is provided concerning cash flows, off-balance sheet commitments and risk management. The board of directors considered the possibility of reinforcing the accounts and audit committee.  This measure was implemented beginning on April 1, 2005 by the appointment of an additional member to the accounts and audit committee and the replacement of a member of the nominations and compensation committee.  

In 2005,Directors at its meeting of March 29,24, 2010, decided to propose to the boardgeneral shareholders’ meeting of directors reserved partMay 7, 2010 the appointment of its agenda toMr. Antoine Frérot as director of our Company. Mr. Frérot joined Compagnie Générale des Eaux in 1990. He became Chief Executive Officer of CGEA Transport in 1995. In 2000, Mr Frérot became Chief Executive Officer of CONNEX, the Transport Division of Vivendi Environnemnt and a discussionmember of the progressExecutive Committee of Vivendi Environnement. In January 2003, Antoine Frérot was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Eau, the Water Division of Veolia Environnement, and executive vice president of Veolia Environnement. Since November 2009, he has been the Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Environnement. Moreover, the general shareho lders’ meeting of May 7, 2010 will vote on the appointment, as a member of the Board on Directors, of Groupement Industriel Marcel Dassaut, French joint stock company (SAS), whose first permanent representative will be its operations, in particularDeputy Managing Director Mr. Olivier Costa de Beauregard. This shareholders’ meeting will also vote on the need to address requests for improved contentappointment of one “censeur” (supervisory non-voting member), Thierry Dassault. (see Item 8: “Financial Information Consolidated Statements and increased frequencyOther Financial Information – Significant Changes”, below) In addition, this meeting will vote on the ratification of information reporting to directors. To this end, management begun to provide the board with important information immediately, including with detailed descriptionsappointment and renewal of our group’s activities, market trends and other initiatives on a semi-annual basis.

In 2006, atthe term of Esther Koplowitz. During its meeting held on December 17, 2009 the Board of December 12,Directors appointed Ms. Koplowitz with effect from January 1, 2010 in replacement of Murray Stuart who decided to retire from the boardBoard. Ms. Koplowitz was a member of directors reserved partVeolia Environnement’s Supervisory Board from 2000 to 2002 and is currently Chairman of its agenda to reviewingthe Board of Directors and discussing its functioning. It appears that its operations have clearly improved since the first formal evaluation that was conductedmajority shareholder in 2004.  However, the directors did express the need for more time to consider certain specific subjects (strategy, major acquisitions) in order to have a clearer understanding of subjects toFomento de Construcciones y Contratas (FCC).

Directors may be considered during board meetings and, if needed, to prepare questions. They also suggested that a meeting and discussion regardingcontacted at our company’s strategy should take placeheadquarters, located at least once a year, when the need arises with the directors of our group’s divisions, and that more time should be dedicated to this subject. Finally, the directors requested annual or biannual presentations relating to competition and an improvement in the presentation of our company 46;s financial information (liquidity, group debt and capital resources) compared to with the same information or financial aggregates of by similar groups.  36/38 avenue Kléber, 75116 Paris.



102122



Back to Contents


In accordance with the provisions of the board’s internal charter, a new formal evaluation of the board of directors took place in 2007, as well as an evaluation of the performance of the chairman and the action of our company’s management. This study, conducted under the supervision of the chairman of the nominations and compensation committee, involved the review of a detailed questionnaire completed by directors, the results of which were analyzed and presented at the board of directors’ meeting of December 19, 2007. The directors’ responses once again confirmed that the board’s operations had in general improved, in particular due


Henri Proglio

Age 60

Date of first appointment:

4/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/07/2009

Expiration of term:

2013

Principal Function within our Company:

Chairman of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Electricité de France (EDF)


Louis Schweitzer*

Age 67

Date of first appointment:

4/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/07/2009

Expiration of term:

2011

Principal Function within our Company:

Director and Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Nominations and Compensation Committee since April 30, 2003

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman of the Board of Directors of AstraZeneca (UK)

Chairman of the Board of Directors of AB Volvo (Sweden)


Jean Azéma*

Age 57

Date of first appointment:

4/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/07/2009

Expiration of term:

2011

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive Officer of Groupama SA


Daniel Bouton*

Age 59

Date of first appointment:

4/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/11/2006

Expiration of term:

2010

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Nominations and Compensation Committee since April 1, 2005

Member of the Accounts and Audit Committee since November 2, 2009 and Chairman of this Committee since January 1, 2010.

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman of the Board of Directors ofDMJB Conseil

Senior Advisor ofRothschild &Cie Banque


Jean-François Dehecq*

Age 70

Date of first appointment:

05/11/2006

Expiration of term:

2010

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman of the Board of Directors of Sanofi-Aventis




123



Back to the implementation of the measures agreed on following the formal evaluation in 2004. The directors recommended that the board’s composition be reexamined in orderContents




Pierre-André de Chalendar*

Age 51

Date of first appointment:

05/07/2009

Expiration of Term:

2011

Principal position held within the Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Accounts and Audit Committee since May 7, 2009

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive Officer of Compagnie de Saint-Gobain


Augustin de Romanet de Beaune*

Age 48

Date of first appointment:

03/29/2007

Renewal of term :05/07/2009

Expiration of term:

2013

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive Officer of Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations


Jean-Marc Espalioux*

Age 58

Date of first appointment:

04/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/11/2006

Expiration of term:

2010

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Accounts and Audit Committee since April 30, 2003

Member of the Strategic Research, Innovation and Sustainable Development Committee since September 14, 2006

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Financière Agache Private Equity

Advisor to Permira (Investment Fund)


Paul-Louis Girardot*

Age 76

Date of first appointment:

04/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/11/2006

Expiration of term:

2010

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Accounts and Audit Committee since April 1, 2005

Member of the Strategic Research, Innovation and Sustainable Development Committee since September 14, 2006

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Veolia Eau – Compagnie Générale des Eaux


Esther Koplowitz*

Date of first appointment (to replace Murray Stuart, pursuant to a decision of the Board of Directors on December 17, 2009 and subject to ratification by the General Shareholders Meeting to be held on May 7, 2010):

01/01/2010

Expiration of term:

2014 (subject to ratification by the General Shareholders Meeting to be held on May 7, 2010)

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

President of the Esther Koplowitz Foundation

Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors ofFomento de Construcciones y Contratas(F.C.C.) (representing B-1998 SL)




124



Back to achieve a better distribution of seats between financial, industrial and entrepreneurial members and female members. The directors also requested improved information about the implementation of certain board decisions or developments in projects presented to it.  They also requested an increased focus on mid- and long-term planning as well as strategy.  They further recommended that the scope of missions of the board committees be reviewed periodically and that the committees also perform their own evaluation of their operations. The creation of the strategic research, innovation and sustainable development committee was considered by the directors to be essential. Finally, the directors expressed their desire to have more interaction with non-executive managers and to receive frequent updates on our liquidity and debt, as well as information relating to significant changes in our company’s shareholding.Contents

Information Available to Directors

The chairman supplies directors with information on a timely basis in order to allow them to fully exercise their duties, and transmits to directors on an ongoing basis all significant information concerning our company. Each director may request and receive any information needed for the exercise of his or her, and may receive additional training relating to our group and its activities if he or she so desires.  


Philippe Kourilsky

Age 67

Date of first appointment:

04/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/07/2009

Expiration of term:

2013

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Chairman of the Strategic Research, Innovation And Sustainable Development Committee since September 14, 2006

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Professor at the Collège de France.

Member of the Académie des Sciences.


Serge Michel

Age 83

Date of first appointment:

04/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/11/2006

Expiration of term:

2010

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Chairman of the Nominations and Compensation Committee since April 30,2003

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman of Soficot SAS


Baudouin Prot*

Age 58

Date of first appointment:

04/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/07/2009

Expiration of term:

2011

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Director and Chief Executive Officer of BNP Paribas


Georges Ralli

Age 61

Date of first appointment:

04/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/11/2006

Expiration of term:

2010

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive of European Investment Banking Business of Lazard Group LLC (USA)

Chief Executive Officer Vice President and Managing Partner of Lazard Frères Gestion SAS


Paolo Scaroni*

Age 63

Date of first appointment:

12/12/2006

Renewal of term :05/07/2009

Expiration of term:

2013

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive Officer of ENI (Italy)


*

Independent directors.

As requested by the members of our board of directors, management aims to deliver documents to be reviewed in board meetings to directors in a timely manner and provide without delay any material information relating to our group, as well as communicate between board meetings.

In 2007, the board of directors was periodically informed of our company’s financial situation, cash flows and off-balance sheet commitments primarily through the reports of the accounts and audit committee.  In addition, the board of directors pre-approved all material financing transactions in accordance with its charter.

In order to perform their duties, directors may meet with our company’s principal executive officers upon prior notice to the chairman of the board of directors. As a result, our group’s senior executive vice-president and general secretary regularly participate in board meetings. In addition, heads of divisions are periodically invited to attend board meetings to give presentations relating to their areas of activity.  In 2007, a board meeting was specifically dedicated to the presentation and discussion of the major elements of our strategic plan, and the presentations by each of the heads of our Group’s divisions relating to the issues, priorities and perspectives, and strategic growth areas of their respective divisions.

Duties of Directors

The charter of the board of directors provides that each of our directors is bound by a number of duties and obligations, such as: (i) a duty to act in the corporate interest of our company, (ii) an obligation to inform the board of directors of any existing or potential conflict of interest and to refrain from voting in any situation where such a conflict of interest exists, (iii) a duty of professional secrecy, and (iv) an obligation to comply with our company’s insider trading policy.  More specifically, directors must inform the chairman of the board of any agreement entered into by our company or on its behalf in which such director has any direct or indirect interest

Each director receives a “Director’s Guide” containing the following documents: our company’s articles of association, the list of the powers of the chairman and chief executive officer, the charter of the board of directors, the charters of the accounts and audit committee and the nominations and compensation committee, the rules to be followed by directors for reporting trades in our company’s shares, and a copy of our company’s ethics program entitled “Ethics, Commitment and Responsibility”.  As requested by the directors, the “Director’s Guide” is updated periodically.

With respect to insider trading, directors must report trades in our company’s shares to the AMF and to Veolia Environnement, and must generally comply with the provisions of article L.621-18-2 of the French Monetary and Financial Code(Code monétaire et financier).  The procedures and conditions of this reporting requirement are included in our company’s code of conduct regarding trading in shares.



103125



Back to Contents


PowersHenri Proglio is a graduate of the Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales (HEC). He joined Compagnie Générale des Eaux in 1972 and was appointed Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of CGEA in 1990. He was appointed Executive Vice-President of Vivendi Universal and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Vivendi Water in 1999. He became Chairman of Veolia Environnement’s Management Board in 2000 and Chairman of the Board of Directors and was Chief Executive Officer from April 2003 to November 27, 2009, on which date he was appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement following his appointment as Chairman and Managing Director of Electricité de France (EDF) by decree of the President of the French Republic issued during the Ministerial Council meeting of November 25, 2009.

Louis Schweitzer is a graduate of the Institut d’Etudes Politiques (IEP) in Paris and of the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA) and was a financial controller in the Treasury department. From 1981 to 1986, he was chief of staff for Laurent Fabius (who was successively junior Budget Minister, Minister for Industry and Research and Prime Minister). In 1986, he joined Renault’s senior management and then successively held the positions of director of planning and management control, Chief Finance Officer and Executive Vice-President. He was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Renault in December 1990, then Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in May 1992 until April 29, 2005, when he was appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors of Renault. Louis Schweitzer did not wish to seek the renewal of his term of office as Director of Renault during the annu al general meeting held on May 6, 2009. He was appointed Vice Chairman of the Veolia Environnement Board of Directors on November 27, 2009.

Jean Azéma holds an engineering degree from the Ecole Supérieure d’Agriculture de Purpan (ESAP), as well as a degree from the Centre National d’Etudes Supérieures de Sécurité Sociale (CNESS). He began his career at Union Départementale de la Mutualité Agricole des Pyrénées Orientales in 1975, moved to the Centre National d’Etudes Supérieures de la Sécurité Sociale from 1978 to 1979, and to the Union Départementale de la Mutualité Agricole of Allier from 1979 to 1987. From 1987 to 1995, Mr. Azéma served as financial director of Groupama Vie, investments director for Groupama, account management and consolidation director at Caisse Centrale des Assurances Mutuelles Agricoles (CCAMA) and insurance director at CCAMA. In 1996, he was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Groupama Sud-Ou est, in 1998, Chief Executive Officer of Groupama Sud and in June 2000, Chief Executive Officer of Groupama. Jean Azéma is currently Chief Executive Officer of Groupama SA and of Fédération Nationale Groupama, Chairman of the Fédération Française des Sociétés d’Assurance Mutuelles and deputy Chairman of Fédération Française des Sociétés d’Assurance.

Daniel Bouton holds a degree in political science, is a graduate of the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA) and is a former financial controller in the Treasury department. He has held a number of positions in the French Ministry of Economy, Finance and Industry, including that of budget director, between 1988 and 1991. In 1991, he began working at Société Générale, serving as Chief Executive Officer starting in 1993, and as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer starting in 1997. He was appointed to the position of Chairman of the Board of Directors of Société Générale in May 2008, then resigned from his duties of Director and President of the bank in May 2009. In November 2009, Daniel Bouton incorporated a consulting company, DMJB Conseil, of which he is the President.

Jean-François Dehecq is a graduate of the Ecole Nationale des Arts et Métiers. After having been a mathematics teacher from 1964 to 1965 at the Saint-Vincent de Senlis Catholic high school, he became a scientific research intern in the army’s nuclear propulsion department. In 1965, he joined the Société Nationale des Pétroles d’Aquitaine (SNPA, which later became Elf Aquitaine). After four years in the economics department (1965 to 1969), he became executive assistant (1969 to 1970), and then operations engineer (1970 to 1971) at the Lacq plant, a major gas production site in France. In 1973, he became Chief Executive Officer of Sanofi, a major division of Elf Aquitaine. From 1982 to 1988, he was deputy Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Sanofi before assuming full management authority in February 1988. In 1999, he became Chairma n and Chief Executive Officer of Sanofi Synthelabo and, in 2004, organized the Sanofi-Aventis merger. Since 2007, Jean-François Dehecq has been the Chairman of the Board of Directors of Sanofi-Aventis.

Pierre-André de Chalendar is a graduate of ESSEC and the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA). He holds the rank of Government Finance Inspector. In November 1989, he joined Compagnie de Saint Gobain where he held various positions, before being appointed Deputy Chief Executive Officer in May 2005, Director in June 2006 then Chief Executive Officer of Compagnie de Saint Gobain since June 2007.



Under126



Back to Contents


Augustin de Romanet de Beaune is a graduate of the Institut d’Etudes Politiques (IEP) in Paris and of the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA). He began his career in the budget department of the French Ministry of Economy and Finance. In 1990, he was a finance attaché with France’s permanent mission to the European Community in Brussels, before returning to the budget department in 1993 as head of the budgetary analysis and policy office. In 1995, he became a technical advisor in the office of the Minister of the Economy and Finance, and then chief of staff to the junior Budget Minister. After having been a budgetary advisor to the deputy Budget Minister, government press secretary and project leader with the French Ministry of Economy and Finance from 1995 to 1997, Augustin de Romanet de Beaune became deputy director and project leader with the office of the budget director, then deputy director charged with the transportation sector in the budget department. In 1999 and 2000, he was successively appointed manager of Oddo et Compagnie and managing partner of Oddo Pinatton Corporate. In 2002, Augustin de Romanet de Beaune was appointed to the position of chief of staff of the deputy Budget and Budgetary Reform Minister and deputy chief of staff of the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Industry. From 2004 to 2005, he held the positions of chief of staff of the Minister of Employment, Labor and Social Cohesion, deputy chief of staff of the Prime Minister and deputy Secretary General to the Presidency of the Republic. After having been finance and strategy vice-president and a member of the Executive Committee of the Crédit Agricole Group since October 2006, Augustin de Romanet de Beaune was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations in March 2007.

Jean-Marc Espalioux holds degrees in political science, law and economics and is an alumnus of the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA). He was a financial controller in the Treasury department from 1978 to 1983. He joined Compagnie Générale des Eaux in 1984, becoming Chief Finance Officer in 1987 and Executive Vice-President in 1996. Jean-Marc Espalioux was a director of the Accor group from 1987 to 1996 and Chairman of the management board from 1997 to 2006. Jean-Marc Espalioux has been Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Financière Agache Private Equity since July 2006.

Paul-Louis Girardot was a director and Chief Executive Officer of Vivendi until 1998. He focused principally on developing the Veolia Environnement Group’s utilities concessions, particularly in the Water sector. In addition, he contributed significantly to Vivendi’s activities in the telephone sector, in particular mobile telephones. He also worked to expand the Veolia Environnement Group’s business in the Energy Services sector and in the decentralized production of electric power (cogeneration), through the Dalkia subsidiary. Paul-Louis Girardot has been Chairman of the supervisory board of Veolia Eau-Compagnie Générale des Eaux since 2001.

Ms. Esther Koplowitz (Marquise de Casa Peñalver) is the President of the Esther Koplowitz Foundation, which she created herself. Exclusively financed by contributions from its founder, the Esther Koplowitz Foundation is intended, firstly, to provide social and healthcare assistance to seniors, to the physically and mentally handicapped, to minors, and to people with problems of social integration or threatened with exclusion for physical, social or cultural reasons and, secondly, to support research. Since the time of its creation, the Esther Koplowitz Foundation has donated more than EUR 100 million, mainly devoted to building and fitting out homes for the elderly and underprivileged suffering from severe physical or mental handicaps (seven centers) and to the creation of a the Esther Koplowitz Biomedical Research Center (CIBEK by its French acronym), which aspir es to set the standard in its field in Spain. In recognition of her commitment to the social and humanitarian sectors and to research funding, Ms. Koplowitz, a Spanish business leader, has won numerous awards, including the Grand Cross of Civil Merit from the Spanish government, The Golden Cross of the Civil Order of Social Solidarity, from Her Majesty the Queen of Spain, the Blanquerna Prize, from the regional government of Catalonia, the Arms of the City of Barcelona, the title of Honorary Citizen of the City of Valencia; the Silver Medal of the Valencian Council of Culture; the Gold Medal of the Regional Community of Madrid; the Grand Cross of Health of Madrid; the Imserso Infante Cristina Prize for Social Merit in 2008; the Gold and Diamond Insignia of the Foundation of the Orphans of the Spanish National Police Force; the Montblanc Prize for the best company manager of 2004; and, finally, the Business Leader of the Year Award, granted by the US-Spain Chamber of Commerce in 2007. Member of the supervisor y board of Veolia Environnement from 2000 to 2002, Ms. Koplowitz is also vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chairman of the strategic committee and majority shareholder of the Spanish company Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas (FCC) specializing in environmental services, renewable energies, infrastructures and cement. She is also Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors of Cementos Portland Valderrivas, member of the Board of Directors of WRG (U.K.), ASA (Austria) and Alpine (Austria), as well as Chairman of the Board of Directors of B-1998, S.L. For several years now, Veolia Environnement and F.C.C. have jointly held a subsidiary, Proactiva Medio Ambiente S.A., present in Latin America.

Philippe Kourilsky is a graduate of the Ecole Polytechnique, and holds a doctorate in sciences from the University of Paris. He has devoted his career to life sciences research. He has held numerous management positions in the public and private research sectors, and in particular was the Director of Research at the CNRS and Director General of the Institut Pasteur from 2000 to 2005. Philippe Kourilsky is currently a professor at the Collège de France, a member of the Académie des Sciences and holds honorary doctorates from several foreign universities.



127



Back to Contents


Serge Michel has spent his entire career in the construction and public works sector. After having held the position of Executive Vice-President with the Compagnie de Saint-Gobain group and been Chairman of Socea, he chaired the SGE group until 1991 and the CISE group until 1997. He was Executive Vice-President of the Compagnie Générale des Eaux until 1992. He is currently Chairman of Soficot, a business management and investment consulting company he founded in 1997.

Baudouin Prot is a graduate of the Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales (HEC) and of the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA). From 1974 to 1983, he was successively the deputy to the prefect of the Franche-Comté region, financial controller in the Treasury department and deputy to the energy and raw materials director general in the Ministry of Industry. He joined Banque Nationale de Paris in 1983, where he held various positions before being appointed Executive Vice-President in 1992 and Chief Executive Officer in 1996. After having been appointed director and Executive Vice-President of BNP Paribas in March 2000, he has been a director and Chief Executive Officer of BNP Paribas since June 2003.

Georges Ralli holds a graduate degree (DESS) in banking and finance from the University of Paris-V and is a graduate of the Institut d’Etudes Politiques (IEP) in Paris and of the Institut Commercial in Nancy. In 1970, he joined Crédit Lyonnais, where he held various management positions until 1981. In 1982, he served as secretary of the Savings Development and Protection Commission. From 1982 to 1985, he headed the financial negotiations department of Crédit du Nord. He joined Lazard in 1986, and became managing partner in 1993 and jointly headed the mergers and acquisitions department of Lazard LLC starting in 1999. Since 2000, Georges Ralli has been Deputy Chairman and a member of the Executive Committee of Lazard LLC (United States). Since 2006, he has been the Co-Chairman of the European Investment Banking Committee of the Lazard Group LLC (United St ates) and a member of the European Advisory Board. He was head of Maison française from 2006 to 2009. He currently manages the European M&A activities (Chairman of Maison Lazard) and Asset Management activities (President of Lazard Frères Gestion).

Paolo Scaroni holds a degree in economics from Bocconi University in Milan and an MBA from Columbia Business School in New York. After having spent a year with McKinsey & Company following his MBA, between 1973 and 1985, he held various positions with Saint Gobain, ultimately heading the “flat glass” division. In 1985, Paolo Scaroni became Chief Executive Officer of Techint, while at the same time holding the positions of deputy Chairman of Falck and Executive Vice-President of SIV, a joint venture between Techint and Pilkington plc. He became Chief Executive Officer of Pilkington plc in 1996, a position he held until May 2002. He was Chief Executive Officer of Enel from 2002 to 2005 and in June 2005 became Chief Executive Officer of Eni, a position he still holds.

Evaluation of the independence of directors

As defined by the Board of Directors’ internal rules and regulations, an independent director is a director who does not have any relationship with the Company, its Group or its management that could compromise his ability to exercise his judgment objectively. The criteria in the internal rules and regulations for determining directors’ independence are in accordance with the recommendations of the AFEP-MEDEF corporate governance code.

These criteria are evaluated and weighted by the Board of Directors, which can determine that despite the fact that a director does not meet the criteria set forth in the internal rules and regulations, a director can nevertheless be considered to be independent in light of his specific situation or that of the Company, taking into account its shareholders or any other reason. Conversely, the Board of Directors can determine that a director is not independent despite the fact that he meets the criteria set forth in the internal rules and regulations.

The internal rules and regulations also require that, each year, before the publication of the reference document, the Board of Directors evaluate the independence of each of its members on the basis of the criteria contained in said rules and regulations, specific circumstances, the positions of the relevant director, the Company and the Group and the opinion of the Nominations and Compensation Committee.

After reviewing the opinion of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, at its meeting of March 24, 2010, the Board of Directors conducted its annual evaluation of the directors’ independence. Based on this evaluation, the Board considered the following directors to be independent: Jean Azéma, Daniel Bouton, Pierre-André de Chalendar, Jean-François Dehecq, Augustin de Romanet de Beaune, Jean-Marc Espalioux, Paul-Louis Girardot, Baudouin Prot, Paolo Scaroni, Louis Schweitzer and Esther Koplowitz.



128



Back to Contents


With regard to the banking relationships between Veolia Environnement and BNP Paribas, of which Baudouin Prot is a director and Chief Executive Officer, the Board of Directors considered that Veolia Environnement’s solid financial position, the fact that it does not rely on bank financing and the Company’s limited stake in that bank’s business activities enabled it to consider that Baudouin Prot is an independent director on the Company’s Board. Augustin de Romanet de Beaune was deemed to be independent due to the fact that Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations has broad powersbeen charged with making investments that are of public benefit, in particular in the environmental services sector. Lastly, Paul-Louis Girardot was deemed to actbe independent due to the time that has elapsed since he left his position as Chief Executive Officer of the former lead company of what is now the Water Division. The other directors deemed to be independent do not have any business relations with the Company, or do not have significant business relations that are likely to compromise their ability to exercise their judgment objectively.

Accordingly, our Board of Directors has eleven independent members as of the date of this annual report on behalfForm 20-F.

Compensation

Directors may be compensated in one of two ways: directors’ fees paid for attending meetings of our companyBoard of Directors (jetons de présence), which are set by our Company’s annual shareholders’ meeting, and whose allocation is determined by our Board of Directors pursuant to recommendations of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, and exceptional compensation, which may be awarded by the Board of Directors under conditions set by law.

The amount of directors’ fees paid in 2009 and their division between the members of the Board of Directors are described and detailed in a manner thattable under “Compensation – Board of Directors Compension”. No exceptional compensation was awarded to directors in 2009.

Operations and activity in 2009

Directors may participate in Board deliberations by videoconference or other means of telecommunications, in accordance with the requirements of Articles L. 225-37 and R. 225-21 of the French Commercial Code and as provided by the internal rules and regulations of the Board of Directors. In such case, directors are deemed present for the purpose of calculating the quorum and majority, except with regard to the vote on certain major decisions as provided by law and by the Board’s internal rules (in particular, the preparation of the annual financial statements, the management report and the consolidated financial statements). This option was used at ten Board meetings in 2009 (compared with four meetings in 2008).

According to its internal rules and regulations, the Company’s Board of Directors is consistent with its corporate purposesrequired to meet at least four times per year. During the 2009 fiscal year, the Board met fourteen times (compared to seven times in 2008). On average, Board meetings lasted two hours, thereby allowing for a thorough examination and discussion of the matters of business on the agenda. The average attendance rate at Board meetings in 2009 was 85.9% (compared to 80.6% in 2008).

In 2009, the Board of Directors was regularly informed of the Group’s financial situation and monitored the sale of assets program and the efficiency plan set up notably as a result of the deterioration of the position of the Environmental Services Division at the end of the 2008 fiscal year. Furthermore, during the second six months of the year, the Board met regularly in order to conduct an in-depth review of changes to be made to the Company’s governance in light of the appointment of Mr. Henri Proglio as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of EDF and to definediscuss his replacement as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. On issues of corporate governance, the Board’s work focused, in particular, on the adoption and implementimplementation of the orientationAFEP-MEDEF code, as amended in 2008, the termination of our company’s activities, subjectthe employment contract of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer an d then of the Chief Executive Officer, the separation of the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and providing termination compensation to those powers expressly granted to our shareholder by law or our company’s articlesthe Chief Executive Officer, the creation of associations. The boardthe position of Vice-Chairman, setting the compensation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and, then, of the Chairman and of the Chief Executive Officer individually after this position was separated into two positions, the corporate officer’s compensation policy and the examination of the Executive Committee’s one, evaluating the independence of directors, can address any issue relatingevaluating internal controls and approving the Chairman’s report, distributing directors’ fees to our company’s affairs.directors and revising the rules for distributing the variable portion of directors’ fees and revising the internal rules and regulations of the Board and of its Committees.

In addition2009, the Board of Directors’ other activities also focused on the following matters: the budget, the annual and semi-annual financial statements, obtaining information on the financial statements for the first and third quarters, the Group’s financing policy, the resolutions to be submitted to the powers ofannual combined general shareholders’ meeting, giving its opinion on the board of directors under applicable law, company rules requireCompany’s policy with regard to incentive plans for the chief executive officerGroup’s managers and corporate officers (stock options, free shares), a capital increase reserved to obtain prior board approval for certainemployees, granting financial and legal authorizations to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and to the Chief Executive Officer and the renewal thereof. The Board examined the Group’s significant decisions.  These limitations are described in greater detail below intransactions and, when necessary, granted the paragraphs relatingrequired authorizations.



129



Back to management.Contents


Board Members

The following table sets forth the names and ages of the current members of our boardBoard of directors,Directors, the date of their first appointment, or renewal, as the case may be, to the boardBoard and the date of expiration of their current term and their current principal business activities conducted outside of our company.Company. All positions and offices of our directors indicated below are given as of January 31, 2008.2010. Unless otherwise stated, all terms of office shall expire at the general shareholders’ meeting for the year stated.

Pursuant to the recommendation of our Nominations and Compensation Committee, our Board of Directors at its meeting of March 24, 2010, decided to propose to the general shareholders’ meeting of May 7, 2010 the appointment of Mr. Antoine Frérot as director of our Company. Mr. Frérot joined Compagnie Générale des Eaux in 1990. He became Chief Executive Officer of CGEA Transport in 1995. In 2000, Mr Frérot became Chief Executive Officer of CONNEX, the Transport Division of Vivendi Environnemnt and a member of the Executive Committee of Vivendi Environnement. In January 2003, Antoine Frérot was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Eau, the Water Division of Veolia Environnement, and executive vice president of Veolia Environnement. Since November 2009, he has been the Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Environnement. Moreover, the general shareho lders’ meeting of May 7, 2010 will vote on the appointment, as a member of the Board on Directors, of Groupement Industriel Marcel Dassaut, French joint stock company (SAS), whose first permanent representative will be its Deputy Managing Director Mr. Olivier Costa de Beauregard. This shareholders’ meeting will also vote on the appointment of one “censeur” (supervisory non-voting member), Thierry Dassault. (see Item 8: “Financial Information Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information – Significant Changes”, below) In addition, this meeting will vote on the ratification of the appointment and renewal of the term of Esther Koplowitz. During its meeting held on December 17, 2009 the Board of Directors appointed Ms. Koplowitz with effect from January 1, 2010 in replacement of Murray Stuart who decided to retire from the Board. Ms. Koplowitz was a member of Veolia Environnement’s Supervisory Board from 2000 to 2002 and is currently Chairman of the Board of Directors and majority shareholder inFomento de Construcciones y Contratas (FCC).

Directors may be contacted at our headquarters, located at 36/38 avenue Kléber, 75116 Paris.

Henri Proglio

Age 58

Date of first appointment:
4/30/2003

Expiration of term:
2009

Principal Function within our Company:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

None.

Jean Azéma*

Age 55

Date of first appointment:
4/30/2003

Expiration of term:
2009

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive Officer of Groupama SA




104122



Back to Contents



Daniel Bouton*

Henri Proglio

Age 5860

Date of first appointment:
appointment
:

4/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/07/2009

Expiration of term:
2012

2013

Principal Function within our Company:

MemberChairman of the boardBoard of directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Nominations and Compensation Committee since April 1, 2005

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman and chief executive officer of Société Générale

Jean- François Dehecq*

Age 68

Date of first appointment:
5/11/2006

Expiration of term:
2012

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directorsDirectors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Sanofi-AventisElectricité de France (EDF)

Augustin de Romanet de Beaune*

Louis Schweitzer*

Age 4767

Date of first appointment:
3/29/2007

4/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/07/2009

Expiration of term:
2009

2011

Principal Function within our Company:

MemberDirector and Vice-Chairman of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive Officer of Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations




105



Back to Contents



Jean-Marc Espalioux*

Age 56

Date of first appointment:
4/30/2003

Renewal of term :5/11/2006

Expiration of term:
2012

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Accounts and Audit Committee since April 30, 2003

Member of the strategic research, innovation and sustainable development committee since September 14, 2006

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman and chief executive officer of Financière Agache Private Equity

Paul-Louis Girardot*

Age 74

Date of first appointment: 4/30/2003

Renewal of term :5/11/2006

Expiration of term:
2012

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Accounts and Audit Committee since April 1, 2005

Member of the strategic research, innovation and sustainable development committee since September 14, 2006

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Veolia Eau – Compagnie Générale des Eaux




106



Back to Contents



Philippe Kourilsky

Age 65

Date of first appointment: 4/30/2003

Expiration of term:
2009

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Chairman of the strategic research, innovation and sustainable development committee since September 14, 2006

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Professor at the Collège de France.

Serge Michel

Age 81

Date of first appointment: 4/30/2003

Renewal of term:
5/11/2006

Expiration of term:
2012

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

President of the Nominations and Compensation Committee since April 30,2003

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman of Soficot SAS

Baudoin Prot*

Age 56

Date of first appointment: 4/30/2003

Expiration of term:
2009

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Director and Chief Executive Officer of BNP Paribas




107



Back to Contents



Georges Ralli*

Age 59

Date of first appointment: 4/30/2003

Renewal of term:
5/11/2006

Expiration of term:
2012

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive of European Investment Banking Business of Lazard Group LLC (USA)

Chief executive officer Vice President and Managing Partner of Lazard Frères SAS

Paolo Scaroni*

Age 61

Date of first appointment: 12/12/2006

Expiration of term:
2009

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of ENI (Italy)

Louis Schweitzer*

Age 65

Date of first appointment: 4/30/2003

Expiration of term:
2009

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the board of directorsDirectors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Nominations and Compensation Committee since April 30, 2003

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman of the Board of Directors of RenaultAstraZeneca (UK)

Chairman of the Board of Directors of AB Volvo (Sweden)


Jean Azéma*

Age 57

Date of first appointment:

4/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/07/2009

Expiration of term:

2011

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive Officer of Groupama SA


Daniel Bouton*

Age 59

Date of first appointment:

4/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/11/2006

Expiration of term:

2010

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Nominations and Compensation Committee since April 1, 2005

Member of the Accounts and Audit Committee since November 2, 2009 and Chairman of this Committee since January 1, 2010.

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman of the Board of Directors ofDMJB Conseil

Senior Advisor ofRothschild &Cie Banque


Jean-François Dehecq*

Age 70

Date of first appointment:

05/11/2006

Expiration of term:

2010

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman of the Board of Directors of Sanofi-Aventis




108123



Back to Contents



Murray Stuart*

Pierre-André de Chalendar*

Age 7451

Date of first appointment:

05/07/2009

Expiration of Term:

2011

Principal position held within the Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Accounts and Audit Committee since May 7, 2009

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive Officer of Compagnie de Saint-Gobain


Augustin de Romanet de Beaune*

Age 48

Date of first appointment: 4/30/2003

03/29/2007

Renewal of term:
term :
5/11/200605/07/2009

Expiration of term:
2012

2013

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the boardBoard of directorsDirectors of Veolia Environnement

ChairmanPrincipal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive Officer of Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations


Jean-Marc Espalioux*

Age 58

Date of first appointment:

04/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/11/2006

Expiration of term:

2010

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Accounts and Audit Committee since April 30, 2003

Member of the Strategic Research, Innovation and Sustainable Development Committee since September 14, 2006

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

NoneChairman and Chief Executive Officer of Financière Agache Private Equity

Advisor to Permira (Investment Fund)


Paul-Louis Girardot*

Age 76

Date of first appointment:

04/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/11/2006

Expiration of term:

2010

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Member of the Accounts and Audit Committee since April 1, 2005

Member of the Strategic Research, Innovation and Sustainable Development Committee since September 14, 2006

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Veolia Eau – Compagnie Générale des Eaux

*

Independent directors.Esther Koplowitz*

Date of first appointment (to replace Murray Stuart, pursuant to a decision of the Board of Directors on December 17, 2009 and subject to ratification by the General Shareholders Meeting to be held on May 7, 2010):

01/01/2010

Expiration of term:

2014 (subject to ratification by the General Shareholders Meeting to be held on May 7, 2010)

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

President of the Esther Koplowitz Foundation

Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors ofFomento de Construcciones y Contratas(F.C.C.) (representing B-1998 SL)




124



Back to Contents




Philippe Kourilsky

Age 67

Date of first appointment:

04/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/07/2009

Expiration of term:

2013

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Chairman of the Strategic Research, Innovation And Sustainable Development Committee since September 14, 2006

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Professor at the Collège de France.

Member of the Académie des Sciences.


Serge Michel

Age 83

Date of first appointment:

04/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/11/2006

Expiration of term:

2010

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Chairman of the Nominations and Compensation Committee since April 30,2003

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chairman of Soficot SAS


Baudouin Prot*

Age 58

Date of first appointment:

04/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/07/2009

Expiration of term:

2011

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Director and Chief Executive Officer of BNP Paribas


Georges Ralli

Age 61

Date of first appointment:

04/30/2003

Renewal of term :05/11/2006

Expiration of term:

2010

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive of European Investment Banking Business of Lazard Group LLC (USA)

Chief Executive Officer Vice President and Managing Partner of Lazard Frères Gestion SAS


Paolo Scaroni*

Age 63

Date of first appointment:

12/12/2006

Renewal of term :05/07/2009

Expiration of term:

2013

Principal Function within our Company:

Member of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement

Principal Business Activities outside our Company:

Chief Executive Officer of ENI (Italy)


*

Independent directors.




125



Back to Contents


Henri PROGLIOProglio is a graduate of the HEC business school in Paris.Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales (HEC). He joined Compagnie Générale des Eaux in 1972 and was appointed PresidentChairman and Chief Executive Officer of CGEA in 1990. He was appointed Executive Vice PresidentVice-President of Vivendi Universal and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Vivendi Water in 1999. He became Chairman of Veolia Environnement’s Management Board in 2000 and Chairman of itsthe Board of Directors and was Chief Executive Officer from April 2003 to November 27, 2009, on which date he was appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement following his appointment as Chairman and Managing Director of Electricité de France (EDF) by decree of the President of the French Republic issued during the Ministerial Council meeting of November 25, 2009.

Louis Schweitzer is a graduate of the Institut d’Etudes Politiques (IEP) in Paris and of the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA) and was a financial controller in the Treasury department. From 1981 to 1986, he was chief of staff for Laurent Fabius (who was successively junior Budget Minister, Minister for Industry and Research and Prime Minister). In 1986, he joined Renault’s senior management and then successively held the positions of director of planning and management control, Chief Finance Officer and Executive Vice-President. He was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Renault in December 1990, then Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in May 1992 until April 2003.  29, 2005, when he was appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors of Renault. Louis Schweitzer did not wish to seek the renewal of his term of office as Director of Renault during the annu al general meeting held on May 6, 2009. He was appointed Vice Chairman of the Veolia Environnement Board of Directors on November 27, 2009.

Jean AZEMAAzémaholds an engineering degree from the Ecole Supérieure d’Agriculture de Purpan (ESAP), as well as a degree from the Centre National d’Etudes Supérieures de Sécurité Sociale (CNESS). He began his career at l’UnionUnion Départementale de la Mutualité Agricole des Pyrénées Orientales in 1975, then atmoved to the Centre National d’Etudes Supérieures de la Sécurité Sociale from 1978 to 1979, and withto the UnitéUnion Départementale de la Mutualité Agricole of Allier from 1979 to 1987. From 1987 to 1995, Mr. Azéma served as financial director of Groupama Vie, investments director of investments offor Groupama, director of account management and consolidation director at Caisse Centrale des Assurances Mutuelles Agricoles (CCAMA) and insurance director of insurance at CCAMA. In 1996, he was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Gr oupama SouthwestGroupama Sud-Ou est, in 1998, Chief Executive Officer of Groupama Sud and in 1998,June 2000, Chief Executive Officer of Groupama Sud.  In June 2000,Groupama. Jean Azéma was appointed chief executive officer of Groupama.  He is currently the chief executive officerChief Executive Officer of Groupama SA and of the Fédération Nationale Groupama, presidentChairman of the Fédération Française des Sociétés d’Assurance Mutuelles and vice-presidentdeputy Chairman of the Fédération Françaisesaise des Sociétés d’Assurance.


Daniel BOUTONBouton holds a degree in political science, and is a graduate of the Ecole Nationale d'Administrationd’Administration (ENA). As part of and is a former financial controller in the French financial controllers’ civil service corps, he occupiedTreasury department. He has held a number of different positions in the French Ministry of Economy, Finance and Industry, including that of Budget Director,budget director, between 1988 and 1991. SinceIn 1991, he has workedbegan working at Société Générale, serving as Managing Director fromChief Executive Officer starting in 1993, to 1997, and as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from 1997starting in 1997. He was appointed to 2008.  Mr. Bouton is currentlythe position of Chairman and chief executive officerof the Board of Directors of Société Générale.rale in May 2008, then resigned from his duties of Director and President of the bank in May 2009. In November 2009, Daniel Bouton incorporated a consulting company, DMJB Conseil, of which he is the President.

Jean-François DEHECQDehecq graduated fromis a graduate of the Ecole Nationale des Arts et Métiers. After having been a mathematics professorteacher from 1964 to 1965 at the Lycée catholique Saint-Vincent de Senlis Catholic high school, he became a scientific research intern in the army’s nuclear propulsion department of the army.department. In 1965, he joined the Société Nationale des Pétroles d’Aquitaine (SNPA, exwhich later became Elf Aquitaine). After four years working forin the economics department (1965 to 1969), he became executive assistant (1969 to 1970), and then operations engineer (1970 to 1971) at the Plant in Lacq plant, a major site for gas supplyproduction site in France. In 1973, he became chief executive officerChief Executive Officer of Sanofi, an important parta major division of Elf Aquitaine. From 1982 to 1988, he was vice-presidentdeputy Chairman and chief executive officerChief Executive Officer of Sanofi before taking chargeassuming full management authority in February 1988. In 1999, he became chairmanChairma n and chief executive officerChief Executive Officer of Sanofi Synthel abo. InSynthelabo and, in 2004, he organized the merger of Sanofi-Aventis. Mr.Sanofi-Aventis merger. Since 2007, Jean-François Dehecq is currently chairmanhas been the Chairman of the boardBoard of directorsDirectors of Sanofi-Aventis.

Pierre-André de Chalendar is a graduate of ESSEC and the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA). He holds the rank of Government Finance Inspector. In November 1989, he joined Compagnie de Saint Gobain where he held various positions, before being appointed Deputy Chief Executive Officer in May 2005, Director in June 2006 then Chief Executive Officer of Compagnie de Saint Gobain since June 2007.



109126



Back to Contents


Augustin DE ROMANET DE BEAUNEde Romanet de Beaune holdsis a diploma fromgraduate of the Institut d’Etudes Politiques (IEP) in Paris and of the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA). He began his career as ain the budget director withindepartment of the French Ministry of EconomicsEconomy and Finance. In 1990, he was a finance attaché within the Frenchwith France’s permanent mission to the European Community in Brussels, before returning to the budget department in 1993 as chiefhead of the budgetary analysis and politics bureau in 1993.policy office. In 1995, he became a technical advisor withinin the Ministryoffice of Economicsthe Minister of the Economy and Finance, and technical consultant, followed bythen chief of staff ofto the budget secretary.junior Budget Minister. After having served asbeen a budgetary consultantadvisor to the deputy minister of budgets,Budget Minister, government spokespersonpress secretary and mission head withinproject leader with the French Ministry of EconomicsEconomy and Finance betweenfrom 1995 andto 1997, heAugustin de Romanet de Beaune became deputy director reporting toand project leader with the office of the budget director, then deputy director in charge ofcharged with the transportation sector reporting toin the budget director.department. In 1999 and 2000, he was named directorsuccessively appointed manager of Oddo et Compagnie and managing partner of Oddo Pinatton Corporate. In 2002, heAugustin de Romanet de Beaune was appointed to the position of chief of staff toof the deputy budget ministerBudget and assistantBudgetary Reform Minister and deputy chief of staff of the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Industry. From 2004 to 2005, he washeld the positions of chief of staff of the Minister of Employment, WorkLabor and Social Cohesion, and assistantdeputy chief of staff toof the Prime Minister and assistant secretary general fordeputy Secretary General to the PresidentPresidency of the Republic. After having served as assistant director ofbeen finance and strategy vice-president and asa member of the executive committeeExecutive Committee of Groupethe Crédit Agricole Group since October 2006, heAugustin de Romanet de Beaune was named chief executive officerappointed Chief Executive Officer of the Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations onin March 7, 2007.

Jean-Marc ESPALIOUXEspalioux holds degrees in political science, law and economics and is an alumnus of ENA and servedthe Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA). He was a financial controller in the French financial controllers’ civil service corpsTreasury department from 1978 to 1983. In 1984, heHe joined Compagnie Générale des Eaux where he served asin 1984, becoming Chief FinancialFinance Officer in 1987 and Executive Vice-President in 1996. Jean-Marc Espalioux was a director of the Accor group from 1987 to 1996 and as Deputy Managing Director from 1996 to 1997. Having been a director of Accor from 1987 to 1996, he served as Chairman of the Management Board of Accormanagement board from 1997 to 2006. Since July 2006, heJean-Marc Espalioux has been chairmanChairman and chief executive officerChief Executive Officer of Financière Agache Private Equity.Equity since July 2006.

Paul-Louis GIRARDOTGirardot was a Directordirector and the Chief Executive Officer of Vivendi until 1998. His area of focus is the development of delegations activities forHe focused principally on developing the Veolia Environnement Group,Group’s utilities concessions, particularly in our water division.  While at Vivendi,the Water sector. In addition, he contributed greatlysignificantly to the development of itsVivendi’s activities in the area of telephonic communication,telephone sector, in particular radiotelephone.mobile telephones. He has also assisted inworked to expand the Veolia Environnement Group’s developmentbusiness in the area of energy servicesEnergy Services sector and in the decentralized production of decentralized electricity (co-generation)electric power (cogeneration), through Dalkia. Hethe Dalkia subsidiary. Paul-Louis Girardot has been serving as the Chairman of the Supervisory Boardsupervisory board of Veolia Eau-Compagnie Générale des Eaux since 2001.

Ms. Esther Koplowitz (Marquise de Casa Peñalver) is the President of the Esther Koplowitz Foundation, which she created herself. Exclusively financed by contributions from its founder, the Esther Koplowitz Foundation is intended, firstly, to provide social and healthcare assistance to seniors, to the physically and mentally handicapped, to minors, and to people with problems of social integration or threatened with exclusion for physical, social or cultural reasons and, secondly, to support research. Since the time of its creation, the Esther Koplowitz Foundation has donated more than EUR 100 million, mainly devoted to building and fitting out homes for the elderly and underprivileged suffering from severe physical or mental handicaps (seven centers) and to the creation of a the Esther Koplowitz Biomedical Research Center (CIBEK by its French acronym), which aspir es to set the standard in its field in Spain. In recognition of her commitment to the social and humanitarian sectors and to research funding, Ms. Koplowitz, a Spanish business leader, has won numerous awards, including the Grand Cross of Civil Merit from the Spanish government, The Golden Cross of the Civil Order of Social Solidarity, from Her Majesty the Queen of Spain, the Blanquerna Prize, from the regional government of Catalonia, the Arms of the City of Barcelona, the title of Honorary Citizen of the City of Valencia; the Silver Medal of the Valencian Council of Culture; the Gold Medal of the Regional Community of Madrid; the Grand Cross of Health of Madrid; the Imserso Infante Cristina Prize for Social Merit in 2008; the Gold and Diamond Insignia of the Foundation of the Orphans of the Spanish National Police Force; the Montblanc Prize for the best company manager of 2004; and, finally, the Business Leader of the Year Award, granted by the US-Spain Chamber of Commerce in 2007. Member of the supervisor y board of Veolia Environnement from 2000 to 2002, Ms. Koplowitz is also vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chairman of the strategic committee and majority shareholder of the Spanish company Fomento de Construcciones y Contratas (FCC) specializing in environmental services, renewable energies, infrastructures and cement. She is also Vice-Chairman of the Board of Directors of Cementos Portland Valderrivas, member of the Board of Directors of WRG (U.K.), ASA (Austria) and Alpine (Austria), as well as Chairman of the Board of Directors of B-1998, S.L. For several years now, Veolia Environnement and F.C.C. have jointly held a subsidiary, Proactiva Medio Ambiente S.A., present in Latin America.

Philippe KOURILSKYKourilskyis a graduate of the ÉcoleEcole Polytechnique, and holds a doctorate in Francesciences from the University of Paris. He has devoted his career to life sciences research. He has held numerous management positions in the public and has a PhDprivate research sectors, and in science. He joinedparticular was the Director of Research at the CNRS and Director General of the Institut Pasteur in 1972. Hefrom 2000 to 2005. Philippe Kourilsky is currently a professor at the Collège de France.

Serge MICHELhas spent his entire career in the construction and public works business, having served as Vice President of Compagnie de Saint Gobain, Deputy Managing Director and President of SOCEA, Chairman of S.G.E. until 1991, Chairman of CISE until 1997 and Deputy Managing Director of Compagnie Générale des Eaux (which became Vivendi Universal) until 1992. He is currently Chairman of Soficot, which he founded in 1997.

Baudoin PROTis a graduate of the HEC business school in Paris and ENA.  From 1974 to 1983, Mr. Prot was successively the Deputy Prefect of the Franche-Comté region of France, French General Inspector of Finance, and the Deputy Director of Energy and Raw Materials of the Ministry of Industry.  He joined Banque Nationale de Paris (BNP) in 1983, where he served in various positions before becoming Executive Vice President in 1992 and Chief Executive Officer in 1996. After having been a director and executive vice president of BNP Paribas since March 2000, he was named a director and chief executive officer of BNP Paribas in June 2003.  


Georges RALLI holds degrees in banking and finance, political science (from the Paris Institute of Political Science (IEP)) and business from the Institut Commercial de Nancy. He began his banking career at Crédit Lyonnais (1970-1981) and later headed the department of financial negotiations at Crédit du Nord. In 1982, he served as Secretary of the Commission for the Development and Protection of Savings. In 1986, Mr. Ralli joined Lazard, becoming a managing partner in 1993 and then co-head of mergers and acquisitions at Lazard LLC in 1999.  Since 2000, Mr. Ralli has been deputy chairman and a member of the executive committee of Lazard LLC (U.S.)Académie des Sciences and an executive vice president of Lazard Frères (Paris).  Since 2006, he has been Chief Executive of the European Investment Banking Committee of the Lazard Group LLC.holds honorary doctorates from several foreign universities.



110127



Back to Contents


Serge Michel has spent his entire career in the construction and public works sector. After having held the position of Executive Vice-President with the Compagnie de Saint-Gobain group and been Chairman of Socea, he chaired the SGE group until 1991 and the CISE group until 1997. He was Executive Vice-President of the Compagnie Générale des Eaux until 1992. He is currently Chairman of Soficot, a business management and investment consulting company he founded in 1997.

Baudouin Prot is a graduate of the Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales (HEC) and of the Ecole Nationale d’Administration (ENA). From 1974 to 1983, he was successively the deputy to the prefect of the Franche-Comté region, financial controller in the Treasury department and deputy to the energy and raw materials director general in the Ministry of Industry. He joined Banque Nationale de Paris in 1983, where he held various positions before being appointed Executive Vice-President in 1992 and Chief Executive Officer in 1996. After having been appointed director and Executive Vice-President of BNP Paribas in March 2000, he has been a director and Chief Executive Officer of BNP Paribas since June 2003.

Georges Ralli holds a graduate degree (DESS) in banking and finance from the University of Paris-V and is a graduate of the Institut d’Etudes Politiques (IEP) in Paris and of the Institut Commercial in Nancy. In 1970, he joined Crédit Lyonnais, where he held various management positions until 1981. In 1982, he served as secretary of the Savings Development and Protection Commission. From 1982 to 1985, he headed the financial negotiations department of Crédit du Nord. He joined Lazard in 1986, and became managing partner in 1993 and jointly headed the mergers and acquisitions department of Lazard LLC starting in 1999. Since 2000, Georges Ralli has been Deputy Chairman and a member of the Executive Committee of Lazard LLC (United States). Since 2006, he has been the Co-Chairman of the European Investment Banking Committee of the Lazard Group LLC (United St ates) and a member of the European Advisory Board. He was head of Maison française from 2006 to 2009. He currently manages the European M&A activities (Chairman of Maison Lazard) and Asset Management activities (President of Lazard Frères Gestion).

Paolo SCARONIScaroni holds a degree in economics from Bocconi University in Milan and has an MBA from Columbia Business School (New York).in New York. After having spent a year with McKinsey & Company following his MBA, between 1973 and 1985, he held various positions between 1973 and 1985 with Saint Gobain, where he became chairman ofultimately heading the “flat glass” department.division. In 1985, Mr.Paolo Scaroni became chief executive officerChief Executive Officer of Techint, while also being vice-chairmanat the same time holding the positions of deputy Chairman of Falck and executive vice presidentExecutive Vice-President of SIV, a joint venture between Techint and Pilkington plc. He became chief executive officerChief Executive Officer of Pilkington plc in 1996, a position he held until May 2002. Following being chief executive officerHe was Chief Executive Officer of Enel from 2002 to 2005 he became chief executive officer of Eniand in June 2005 a position he still currently holds.   

Louis SCHWEITZER isa graduate of the Institut d’Etudes Politiques de Paris and ENA.  He has served as Inspector of Finances and, from 1981 to 1986, as Chief of Staff of Mr. Laurent Fabius, who over the same period was Deputy Minister of Budget, Minister of Industry and Research and Prime Minister of France.  In 1986, Mr. Schweitzer joined Renault’s senior management as Director, and later served as Director of Planning and Management Control, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President.  He became Chief Executive Officer of RenaultEni, a position he still holds.

Evaluation of the independence of directors

As defined by the Board of Directors’ internal rules and regulations, an independent director is a director who does not have any relationship with the Company, its Group or its management that could compromise his ability to exercise his judgment objectively. The criteria in 1990the internal rules and regulations for determining directors’ independence are in accordance with the recommendations of the AFEP-MEDEF corporate governance code.

These criteria are evaluated and weighted by the Board of Directors, which can determine that despite the fact that a director does not meet the criteria set forth in the internal rules and regulations, a director can nevertheless be considered to be independent in light of his specific situation or that of the Company, taking into account its shareholders or any other reason. Conversely, the Board of Directors can determine that a director is not independent despite the fact that he meets the criteria set forth in the internal rules and regulations.

The internal rules and regulations also require that, each year, before the publication of the reference document, the Board of Directors evaluate the independence of each of its members on the basis of the criteria contained in said rules and regulations, specific circumstances, the positions of the relevant director, the Company and the Group and the opinion of the Nominations and Compensation Committee.

After reviewing the opinion of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, at its meeting of March 24, 2010, the Board of Directors conducted its annual evaluation of the directors’ independence. Based on this evaluation, the Board considered the following directors to be independent: Jean Azéma, Daniel Bouton, Pierre-André de Chalendar, Jean-François Dehecq, Augustin de Romanet de Beaune, Jean-Marc Espalioux, Paul-Louis Girardot, Baudouin Prot, Paolo Scaroni, Louis Schweitzer and Esther Koplowitz.



128



Back to Contents


With regard to the banking relationships between Veolia Environnement and BNP Paribas, of which Baudouin Prot is a director and Chief Executive Officer, the Board of Directors considered that Veolia Environnement’s solid financial position, the fact that it does not rely on bank financing and the Company’s limited stake in that bank’s business activities enabled it to consider that Baudouin Prot is an independent director on the Company’s Board. Augustin de Romanet de Beaune was deemed to be independent due to the fact that Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations has been charged with making investments that are of public benefit, in particular in the environmental services sector. Lastly, Paul-Louis Girardot was deemed to be independent due to the time that has elapsed since he left his position as Chief Executive Officer of the former lead company of what is now the Water Division. The other directors deemed to be independent do not have any business relations with the Company, or do not have significant business relations that are likely to compromise their ability to exercise their judgment objectively.

Accordingly, our Board of Directors has eleven independent members as of the date of this annual report on Form 20-F.

Compensation

Directors may be compensated in one of two ways: directors’ fees paid for attending meetings of our Board of Directors (jetons de présence), which are set by our Company’s annual shareholders’ meeting, and whose allocation is determined by our Board of Directors pursuant to recommendations of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, and exceptional compensation, which may be awarded by the Board of Directors under conditions set by law.

The amount of directors’ fees paid in 2009 and their division between the members of the Board of Directors are described and detailed in a table under “Compensation – Board of Directors Compension”. No exceptional compensation was awarded to directors in 2009.

Operations and activity in 2009

Directors may participate in Board deliberations by videoconference or other means of telecommunications, in accordance with the requirements of Articles L. 225-37 and R. 225-21 of the French Commercial Code and as provided by the internal rules and regulations of the Board of Directors. In such case, directors are deemed present for the purpose of calculating the quorum and majority, except with regard to the vote on certain major decisions as provided by law and by the Board’s internal rules (in particular, the preparation of the annual financial statements, the management report and the consolidated financial statements). This option was used at ten Board meetings in 2009 (compared with four meetings in 2008).

According to its internal rules and regulations, the Company’s Board of Directors is required to meet at least four times per year. During the 2009 fiscal year, the Board met fourteen times (compared to seven times in 2008). On average, Board meetings lasted two hours, thereby allowing for a thorough examination and discussion of the matters of business on the agenda. The average attendance rate at Board meetings in 2009 was 85.9% (compared to 80.6% in 2008).

In 2009, the Board of Directors was regularly informed of the Group’s financial situation and monitored the sale of assets program and the efficiency plan set up notably as a result of the deterioration of the position of the Environmental Services Division at the end of the 2008 fiscal year. Furthermore, during the second six months of the year, the Board met regularly in order to conduct an in-depth review of changes to be made to the Company’s governance in light of the appointment of Mr. Henri Proglio as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of EDF and to discuss his replacement as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer. On issues of corporate governance, the Board’s work focused, in May 1992. He servedparticular, on the adoption and implementation of the AFEP-MEDEF code, as amended in 2008, the termination of the employment contract of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer an d then of the Chief Executive Officer, the separation of the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and providing termination compensation to the Chief Executive Officer, the creation of the position of Vice-Chairman, setting the compensation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and, then, of the Chairman and of the Chief Executive Officer individually after this position until April 29,was separated into two positions, the corporate officer’s compensation policy and the examination of the Executive Committee’s one, evaluating the independence of directors, evaluating internal controls and approving the Chairman’s report, distributing directors’ fees to directors and revising the rules for distributing the variable portion of directors’ fees and revising the internal rules and regulations of the Board and of its Committees.

In 2009, the Board of Directors’ other activities also focused on the following matters: the budget, the annual and semi-annual financial statements, obtaining information on the financial statements for the first and third quarters, the Group’s financing policy, the resolutions to be submitted to the annual combined general shareholders’ meeting, giving its opinion on the Company’s policy with regard to incentive plans for the Group’s managers and corporate officers (stock options, free shares), a capital increase reserved to employees, granting financial and legal authorizations to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and to the Chief Executive Officer and the renewal thereof. The Board examined the Group’s significant transactions and, when necessary, granted the required authorizations.



129



Back to Contents


Board Evaluation

Once a year, the Board is required to include on its agenda an evaluation of its operations prepared by the Nominations and Compensation Committee and a discussion of its operations for the purpose of improving its efficiency, ensuring that important issues are adequately prepared and discussed during Board meetings and assessing the actual contributions of each member to the Board’s work.

In addition, the Board’s internal rules and regulations provide that a formal evaluation of its operations must be carried out every three years by an outside organization, under the direction of the Nominations and Compensation Committee for the purpose of ensuring that the Board complies with the principles governing its operations and studying proposals intended to improve its operations and efficiency. Each year, the Nominations and Compensation Committee provides the Board of Directors with a report evaluating the performances of the Chairman and of the directors, as well as the actions of executive management, which the Board discusses.

In 2009, an informal evaluation of the operations of the Board and its Committees was carried out under the direction of the Chairman of the Nominations and Compensation Committee by sending directors a detailed questionnaire. The responses were analyzed and then presented to the Board of Directors at its meeting of December 17, 2009. The Board adopted the following conclusions:

The directors considered that they had the information necessary for effective participation. Nevertheless, possible improvements were suggested: providing a view of future outlook through more frequent forecasts and focusing on the quality of financial information concerning expected results; providing better summaries of financial information, focusing on essential points and/or questions asked or issues to be resolved; ensuring better communication in terms of frequency and content between meetings; improved reports to the Board on oversight of decisions made, and extend the duration of one or two meetings a year to deepen the strategy.

The organization and operations of the Board (frequency of meetings, attendance of Board members, scheduling, minutes) were deemed satisfactory.

On the whole, the directors considered the composition of the Board to be satisfactory, provided an independent female director was found (it should be noted that Esther Koplowitz was appointed to the Board after this evaluation was carried out) and the balance between financial and industrial directors on the Board was maintained. The distribution of directors’ fees was deemed satisfactory and required no particular comment.

All directors considered that the Committees fulfill their duties. The operation of the Committees (information provided, frequency of meetings, access to executive management) was deemed satisfactory. It was nevertheless requested that the Accounts and Audit Committee make a specific presentation concerning risks and the control thereof.

Lastly, the composition of the Committees was deemed satisfactory (expertise, number, independence). Nevertheless, it was suggested that an additional member be appointed to the Accounts and Audit Committee and to the Nominations and Compensation Committee.

The Board will be provided with a report on progress made on these points.



130



Back to Contents


Information Available to Directors

The Chairman provides directors, in a timely manner, with the information necessary for them to fully perform their duties. In addition, the Chairman constantly provides the members of the Board with all significant information concerning the Company. Each director receives and has the right to request that he be provided with all information necessary to perform his duties, and can request additional training concerning the specificities of the Company and the Group.

In accordance with the requests of the members of the Board of Directors, executive management has given particular attention to increasing the speed with which directors are provided with documents relevant to Board meetings and all significant information concerning the Group’s activities, as well as to providing directors with information between Board meetings.

After the separation of the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, the Board’s internal rules and regulations provide that the non-director Chief Executive Officer is automatically invited to all Board meetings, except if the Chairman or the Board decides otherwise. The Chief Finance Officer and the Secretary General attended Board meetings in 2009. At the request of the Chairman or of a director, the heads of the Group’s Divisions may be invited to any Board meeting that discusses the prospects and strategy of their business sector.

The Board of Directors, in particular through the reports of the Accounts and Audit Committee, was informed from time to time of the Group’s financial situation and cash position, as well as the Company’s off-balance sheet commitments. Every six months, executive management provides directors with in-depth documentation regarding the activities, market trends, context and actions undertaken by the Group, in accordance with any request made by the directors in 2005 atduring the Board evaluation procedure.

In order to perform their duties, the directors may meet with the principal officers of the Company and of the Group, provided the Chairman of the Board is given prior notice.

Duties of Directors

The internal rules and regulations of the Board of Directors provide that the Board’s members are subject to certain obligations, such as: (i) the duty to act in the Company’s corporate interest, (ii) to inform the Board of conflicts of interest, including potential conflicts of interest, (iii) to refrain from participating in votes on any decision in which point his sole function within Renault becamethey may have a conflict of interest, (iv) to comply with their obligation of professional confidentiality, and (v) to comply with the Company’s code of conduct regarding securities transactions. The members of the Board of Directors and the Chief Executive Officer are required to promptly inform the Chairman of the Board of Directors.all agreements made by the Company in which they have a direct or indirect interest or that is made on their behalf by an intermediary.

Murray STUART holds degrees in literatureEach director receives a “Director’s Guide”, which is updated periodically, and law fromwhich includes the Universityfollowing principal documents: the Company’s articles of Glasgow, and is also trained as an accountant. He has pursuedincorporation, a career in industry, commerce and financial services. Mr. Stuart has worked for International Computers Plc (as Chief Financial Officer and Deputy Director), Metal Box plc and Carnaud Metalbox, a packaging manufacturer, (as Vice-President) and Scottish Power Plc (as President from 1992 to 2000). Until May 2002, he also served as Executive Vice Presidentsummary of the powers of the Chief Executive Officer, the Board of Directors’ internal rules and regulations, the internal rules and regulations of the Accounts and Audit Commission for Public ServicesCommittee and of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, the rules regarding directors’ obligations to report transactions involving the Company’s securities, as well as our “Ethics, Commitments and Responsibility” charter.

With respect to trading in our securities, the UK, as Presidentdirectors are required to report to us and to the FrenchAutorité des marchés financiers(AMF) any transactions involving the Company’s securities and, in particular, to comply with the provisions of Trust Hammersmith Hospitals NHS, an important public health educationArticle L. 621-18-2 of the French Monetary and research center in London, and as a director of Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc.   Financial Code (Code Monétaire et Financier).

Management

Our boardRole of directorsthe Chairman

The Chairman of the Board of Directors organizes and directs the mannerwork of the Board and reports thereon to general shareholders’ meetings. He is responsible for preparing reports on the organization of the Board’s work, internal controls and risk management. He chairs general shareholders’ meetings.

In general, the Chairman of the Board of Directors ensures the proper operation of the Company’s management bodies and compliance with good governance principles and practices, in which weparticular regarding the committees created within the Board. He ensures that the directors are managedin a position to perform their duties and that they are adequately informed. He devotes the time necessary to issues concerning the Group’s future and, in particular, issues concerning the Group’s strategy.



131



Back to Contents


The Chairman of the Board chairs Board meetings and prepares and coordinates the Board’s work. In this regard, the Chairman is responsible for:

Convening Board meetings in accordance with the schedule of meetings agreed upon with the directors and decides if it is necessary to convene Board meetings at any other time;

Preparing the agenda for meetings, supervises the preparation of documentation to be provided to the directors and ensures that the information therein is complete;

Ensuring that certain subjects are discussed by the Committees in preparation for Board meetings and ensuring that the Committees perform their duties of making recommendations to the Board;

Leading and directing the Board’s discussions;

Ensuring the directors’ compliance with the provisions of the internal rules and regulations of the Board and of the Committees;

Monitoring implementation of the Board’s decisions;

Preparing and organizing the Board’s periodic evaluation work, in cooperation with the Nominations and Compensation Committee.

In cooperation with the Chief Executive Officer, the Chairman may promote the Company, in particular vis-à-vis the public authorities, major customers and principal investors and partners, both in France and abroad. As the primary contact on the Board for major shareholders, the Chairman is responsible for communicating their point of view and concerns to the Board and the other directors. The Chairman promotes our values and image in all circumstances. The Chairman speaks to third parties in the name of the Board of Directors, except when specific authority to do so has been granted to another director.

The Chief Executive Officer regularly informs the Chairman of the Board of Directors of all significant events and issues concerning the activities of the Group and the Chairman may request that the Chief Executive Officer provide him with any additional information required to enlighten the Board and its Committees. In accordance with the Board’s internal rules and regulations, the directors and the Chief Executive Officer are required to promptly inform the Chairman of the Board of all conflicts of interest, including potential conflicts of interest, and of all proposed agreements that may be made by the Company in which they may have a direct or indirect interest.

The Chairman has at his disposal all resources necessary to perform his duties.

Role of the Vice-Chairman

In addition to the role conferred on him by our articles of association.incorporation, the duties of the Vice-Chairman are to assist the Chairman in carrying out his duties of ensuring the proper functioning of the Company’s governance bodies. In this regard, the Vice-Chairman examines, in particular, our boardconflicts of directors appoints a chief executive officerinterest, including potential conflicts of interest, that may involve the Chairman of the Board and the interests of the Company, whether they arise in connection with operational projects, strategic policies or specific agreements. The Vice-Chairman submits his recommendations to manage our businessthe Chairman and the Board after any necessary consultation with the other independent directors.

The Vice-Chairman is informed of the concerns of major shareholders not represented on a day-to-day basis.  the Board regarding governance issues and ensures that such concerns are addressed. If necessary, and in agreement with the Chairman of the Board, the Vice Chairman may also himself respond to questions of major shareholders or meet with them if the ordinary avenues for doing so (i.e., the Chairman of the Board of Directors, the Chief Executive Officer or the Chief Finance Officer) have been unable to handle such concern or if the nature itself of the matter renders these ordinary avenues inadequate or inappropriate.

In connection with the evaluation of the Board’s operations pursuant to its internal rules and regulations, the Vice-Chairman assists the Nominations and Compensation Committee in its work of evaluating the performance of the Chairman of the Board.



132



Back to Contents


Chief Executive Officer

The chairman of our board of directors may serve, if appointed byChief Executive Officer has the board of directors, as chief executive officer.  On April 30, 2003, our board of directors appointed its chairman, Mr. Henri Proglio, to act as our chief executive officer.  The chief executive officer has broadbroadest possible powers to act on our behalf, includingin the powername of the Company in all circumstances. He is required to represent us in dealings with third parties,act within the limits of ourthe corporate purposepurposes, subject to those powers that the law expressly confers on shareholders’ meetings and the Board of Directors. He represents the Company in its relations with third parties.

In accordance with an internal rule, the Chief Executive Officer is required to exercise his powers expressly reservedwithin the limits prescribed by the internal rules and regulations of the Board of Directors. Therefore, pursuant to our shareholdersthe Board decision of November 27, 2009 that appointed the Chief Executive Officer and our boardin accordance with the Board’s internal rules and regulations, as amended on May 7, 2009, the following actions of directors under applicable law.the Chief Executive Officer require prior Board approval:

Establishing the Group’s strategic policies;

Group transactions involving amounts in excess of €300 million per transaction, with the exception of financing transactions;

Financing transactions, regardless of the terms and conditions thereof, involving amounts in excess of €1.5 billion per transaction if the transaction is carried out in a single installment and €2.5 billion if the transaction is carried out in more than one installment;

Transactions in the Company shares involving more than 1% of the total number of the Company’s shares.

Executive Committee

Following our reorganization on April 30, 2003, and in application of our governance principles, our chairmanthen Chairman and chief executive officerChief Executive Officer created an executive committeeExecutive Committee composed of eight members drawn from each of our four operating divisions.Divisions. Our executive committeeExecutive Committee meets approximately every fifteen days, and is chaired by Mr. Henri Proglio.  The executive committee helpstwo weeks to determine our strategic orientation.

The following table sets forthorientation and to establish major policies. In addition, it authorizes major projects, such as sales contracts and proposed investments, divestments or sales for amounts above certain thresholds. Until November 26, 2009, the names and agesExecutive Committee had eight members, none of the members of our executive committee, their current function in our company and theirwhom had principal business activities outside of our company.  Veolia Environnement:

Henri Proglio, age 60 (Chairman and Chief Executive Officer);

Olivier Barbaroux, age 54 (Senior Executive Vice-President, Chairman of Dalkia);

Antoine Frérot, age 51 (Senior Executive Vice-President, Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Eau – Compagnie Générale des Eaux);

Denis Gasquet, age 56 (Senior Executive Vice-President, Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Environmental Services);

Cyrille du Peloux, age 56 (Senior Executive Vice-President, Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Transport);

Thomas Piquemal, age 40 (Chief Finance Officer);

Véronique Rouzaud, age 51 (Senior Vice President, Human Resources);

Alain Tchernonog, age 66 (General Secretary).

The composition of the Executive Committee was changed when Antoine Frérot was appointed Chief Executive Officer on November 27, 2009 to replace Henri Proglio, who had held the position of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer until then. In addition to his responsibilities as head of the Environmental Services Division, Denis Gasquet was appointed the Company’s Chief Operating Officer. In this capacity, he is in charge of implementing a unified management structure for the Group, supervising the Group’s subsidiaries and cross-disciplinary departments and supervising the effectiveness and structural cost control plans.



111133



Back to Contents


Since February 11, 2010 and as of the date of this annual report on Form 20-F, the Company’s Executive Committee had nine members, none of whom has principal business activities outside of Veolia Environnement:

Antoine Frérot, age 51 (Chief Executive Officer)*;

Olivier Barbaroux, age 54 (Head of the Energy Services Division and Chief Executive Officer of Dalkia)*;

Jean-Pierre Frémont, age 46 (Senior Executive Vice-President in charge of public entities and European affairs);

Denis Gasquet, age 56 (Chief Operating Officer of the Company and Head of the Environmental Services Division)*;

Jean-Michel Herrewyn, age 48 (Head of the Water Division)*;

Olivier Orsini, age 52 (Senior Executive Vice-President and Secretary General)*;

Cyrille du Peloux, age 56 (Head of the Transport Division)*;

Pierre-François Riolacci, age 43 (Chief Finance Officer) ;

Véronique Rouzaud, age 51 (Senior Vice President, Human Resources)*.

* Members of the Executive Committee at December 31, 2009.


The Executive Committee is chaired by Antoine Frérot. This committee is a reflection, consultation and decision making body that meets when the Group’s major policies are established. In addition, it authorizes major Group projects, such as sales contracts and proposed investments, divestments or sales for amounts above certain thresholds. The Executive Committee meets approximately every fifteen days.

Name

Age

Function in Veolia Environnement

Principal Business
Activities Outside
Veolia Environnement

————

————

————

————

Henri Proglio

58

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

None

Jérôme Contamine

50

Senior Executive Vice President

None

Olivier Barbaroux

52

Executive Vice President, Chairman of Veolia Energie

None

Antoine Frérot

49

Executive Vice President, Head of Veolia Eau- Compagnie Générale des Eaux

None

Denis Gasquet

54

Executive Vice President, Head of Veolia Propreté

None

Cyrille du Peloux

54

Executive Vice President, Head of Veolia Transport

None

Véronique Rouzaud

49

Senior Vice President, Human Resources

None

Alain Tchernonog

64

General Secretary

None


In order to further enhance the Company’s capabilities to assess and oversee projects, in 2008, a commitments subcommittee of our Executive Committee was created, which is chaired by the Chief Executive Officer. This subcommittee conducts an in-depth review of major Group projects that must be submitted to the Executive Committee for final decision, before submission to the Board of Directors for authorization depending on the amounts involved. The subcommittee includes the head of the Group Division concerned by a particular project, the Chief Finance Officer and the Company’s Secretary General.

Jérôme ContamineAntoine Frérot is a graduate of theEcole Polytechnique and holds degreesa doctorate from theEcole Polytechnique,Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées. He started his career in 1981 as an engineering researcher at the Central Research Office for French Overseas Departments and Territories. In 1983, he joined the Center of Study and Research of the Ecole Nationale de la Statistique et de l’Administration Economiquenationale des ponts and ENA. He servedchaussées as auditor for the Cour des Comptesproject manager and then become assistant director from 1984 to 1988. From 1988 and held a varietyto 1990, he was in charge of senior positions with Elf (and later TotalFinaElf) between 1988 and 2000. He became Chief Financial Officer and Deputy Managing Director of our company in June 2000. Mr. Contamine holds various positions within our group, the most significant being managing director of Veolia Environnement UK Ltd, director of Veolia Transport, Veolia Propreté, Veolia Environnement Services-Ré, Veolia Environmental Services UK Plc, Veolia Environnement Europe Services and Veolia PPP Finance, member of the supervisory board of Dalkia France and Veolia Eau-Compagniefinancial operations at Crédit National. In 1990, Antoine Frérot joined Compagnie Générale des Eaux as an official representative and, chairmanin 1995, became Chief Executive Officer of CGEA Transport. In 2000, he was appointed Chief Executive Officer of CONNEX, the Transport Division of Vivendi Environnement, and member of the Executive Committee of Vivendi En vironnement. In January 2003, Mr. Frérot was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Eau, the Water Division of Veolia Environnement, North America Operations. &nbs p;Outside our group, Mr. Contamineand Senior Executive Vice President of Veolia Environnement. Since November 2009, he is a directorthe Chief Executive Officer of Rhodia and Valeo.Veolia Environnement.

Olivier Barbarouxis a graduate of theEcole Polytechnique, theEcole Nationale des Ponts et Chausséesand the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He began his career in 1979 as head of the International Investments Bureau at the French Ministry of Industry. He was appointed to the Port Authority of Marseilles-FosMarseille-Fos in 1981, first as Director of New Construction and Ship Repair and then as Director of MarseillesMarseille Terminals and Facilities in 1983. He joined the Paribas Group in 1987 as Deputy Director of Industrial Affairs, and in 1993 was appointed as a member of the Executive Committee of Paribas Affaires Industrielles, in charge of Energy, Natural Resources and Transportation, and as Chairman and CEOChief Executive Officer of Coparex International (listed). In 1996, he was appointed Chairman and CEOChief Executive Officer of VIA GTI (listed). He became global Head of the Energy Division at Paribas in 1998 .1998. He joined our companyCompany in 1999 as Chief Operating Officer of Vivendi Water. He was appointed ChairmanChief Executive Officer of Dalkia in February 2003. Mr. Barbaroux holds various positions within our group,Group, the most significant being chairmanChairman and chief executive officerChief Executive Officer of Dalkia International, managing directorManaging Director (gérant) of Dalkia France permanent representative of Dalkia on the board of directors of Clemessy and directorDirector of Veolia Propreté, SARP and Sade CGTH.

Antoine Frérotis a graduate of the Ecole Polytechnique and holds a doctorate from the Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées. He began his career as an engineer and joined Cergrene, a research center, in 1983, becoming a Director in 1984.  He joined Compagnie Générale des Eaux in 1990, and was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Transport in 1995.  Mr. Frérot holds various positions within our group, the most significant being chief executive officer of Veolia Eau-Compagnie Générale des Eaux, director of Veolia Transport, Veolia Propreté, SARP and Sade CGTH, permanent representative of Veolia Eau-Compagnie Générale des Eaux on the board of directors of Société des Eaux de Marseille, chairman of the supervisory board of Compagnie des Eaux et de l’Ozone and chairman of the board of Veolia Water Solutions &am p; Technologies.



112134



Back to Contents


Jean-Pierre Frémontholds a PhD in political science. Mr. Frémont joined the Group in 1997 as Project Manager for CGEA (Vivendi Environnement). From 1998 to 2002, he held the Managing Director position at CFTA (Vivendi Environnement). He then took over the Municipal Business Development Department for Veolia Eau in 2002, before becoming Key Account Manager for Veolia Environnement in 2007. Mr. Frémont was recently appointed Senior Executive Vice-President in charge of Municipal Business Development and European Affairs of Veolia Environnement and appointed to the Executive Committee.

Olivier Orsini is a graduate of ESCP – EAP Europe Business School. In 1983, he joined the Compagnie Générale des Eaux as special advisor and in 1989, was appointed Chief Executive Officer of theUnion des Services Publicsfor Environmental Services in France. From 1994 to 1999, Mr. Orsini held various positions within our Group, the most significant being Director for International Environmental Services andConsejero Delegado de Ciudad Limpia, for the Group activities in Spain. In 2000, he was appointed Special Advisor to the President and director of Synergies (brand, efficiency plan, purchases and mutualization). Mr. Orsini is also Chairman ofProactiva Medio Ambiente, Veolia Environnement’s joint venture with Fomentos Construcciones y Contratas (FCC) in Latin America. Mr. Orsini was recently appointed Secretary General, Seni or Executive Vice-President and Executive Committee Member of Veolia Environnement.

Denis Gasquetis a graduate of theEcole Polytechniqueand theCentre de Perfectionnement aux Affaires.Affaires. From 1979 to 1989, he served in a variety of positions in theOffice National des Forêts.ts. He joined Compagnie Générale des Eaux in 1989, becoming Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Propreté in 1996. Mr. Gasquet holds various positions within our group,Group, the most significant being member of the supervisory boardSupervisory Board of Veolia Eau-Compagnie Générale des Eaux, directorDirector of Veolia Environmental Services UK Plc, Veolia Transport, SARP and SARP Industries, chairmanChairman of the boardBoard of directorsDirectors of Veolia Environmental Services North America Corp. and Veolia Environmental Services Australia Pty Ltd.

Jean-Michel Herrewyn, is a graduate ofEcole PolytechniqueandEcole Nationale d’Administration. He started his career in 1986 as an engineer in the Avionics division of Thomson CSF. In 1991, he joined the Compagnie Générale de Chauffe (now Dalkia) as technical manager then general manager of the home automation subsidiary. In 1993, he became attaché to the Managing Director and in 1996 ran Dalkia’s German subsidiary and later subsidiaries in Austria and Switzerland. At the beginning of 2000, he was also appointed General Manager of Veolia Transport’s German subsidiary, and also supervised developments in Austria and Switzerland. In 2000, he was appointed Chairman of Valorec, a joint subsidiary of Dalkia and Veolia Propreté, created from the outsourcing of energy and waste management by Novartis plants in Basle (Switzerl and). In March 2003, he joined Veolia Eau as Managing Director of Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies. In December 2009, he was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Eau and to the Executive Committee of Veolia Environnement.

Cyrille du Pelouxis a graduate oftheEcole Polytechnique and theEcole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées (civil(civil engineering). He began his career in the energy department of France’s Ministry of Industry in 1979. In 1985 he joined the Bouygues group where he served as head of the diversification department and then as deputy chief executive officerDeputy Chief Executive Officer of the TF1 television channel in charge of the management and development of the subsidiaries. In 1992, he became chairmanChairman and chief executive officerChief Executive Officer of Lyonnaise Communication, in charge of Noos and of the Paris Première and TPS channels. Mr. du Peloux was chief executive officerChief Executive Officer of Bull from 1999 to 2002, when he joined the Veolia Environnement Group as chief executive officerChief Executive Officer of Veolia Propreté for the UK and Northern Europe. He was then appointed chief executive officerChief Execu tive Officer of Veolia Transp ortTransport on May 31, 2007. Mr. du Peloux holds various positions within our group,Group, the most significant being directorDirector of Veolia Propreté, Veolia Environnement North America Operations and Veolia Environnement UK PlcLtd, Chairman of the Board of Directors of Veolia Transportation Inc. and Chairman of the Supervisory Board of SNCM.

Pierre-François Riolacci, is a graduate of the Paris Institute of Political Science (IEP Paris) and holds a Masters degree in private law. He joined the finance department of Veolia Environnement in 2000. He became Head of Control and Planning in 2003 and Director of Finance in 2007, before being appointed Chief Finance Officer with effect from February 11, 2010 and Executive Committee member of Veolia Environnement. In his earlier career, Mr. Riolacci held different positions with Total from 1990 to 2000 in the supervisory boardareas of SNCM.corporate finance, structured finance and investor relations. He was also financial controller of several of Total’s subsidiaries.

Véronique Rouzaudholds a Master’s degree in law from the Université de Paris II – Assas and ana MBA from theInstitut d’Administration des Entreprisesde Paris. She has occupied key positions in sales and human resources in major international business organizations, first in the Danone group, and then at Coca-Cola in Europe. She was also President of the European Works Council for the Coca-Cola Enterprises Europe Group until January 2007. Since February 2007, she has been the Senior Vice President, Human Resources of Veolia Environnement. Mrs.Ms. Rouzaud is also member of the boardBoard of directorsDirectors of Sade CGTH, a subsidiary of Veolia Environnement.

Alain Tchernonog holds a doctorate in law. He is a graduate of the Institut d’Administration d’Entreprises and is admitted to the Bar. He began his career in 1972 as in-house lawyer at the Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales. In 1974, he was appointed chief of legal service of the Agence Nationale de Valorisation de la Recherche (ANVAR). Alain Tchernonog was head of contracts department in Roussel-Uclaf from 1979 to 1990, and then general counsel of Pierre Fabre group from 1990 to 1995. He joined the Compagnie Générale d’Entreprises Automobiles (which became Onyx and Connex and Veolia Propreté and Veolia Transport) in 1995 to manage the legal department and became general counsel of Veolia Environnement in 2001. He became member of the executive committee of our company in January 2007 and was appointed General Secretary in March 2007. Mr. Tchernonog holds various positions within our group, the most significant being chairman and chief executive officer of Veolia Environnement Services-Ré, director of Veolia Environnement Europe Services, Veolia PPP Finance, Codeve and Veolia Environnement North America Operations and member of the supervisory board of Dalkia France.



113135



Back to Contents


COMPENSATION

Board of Directors’ Compensation

The members of our boardBoard of directorsDirectors received the following compensation during the 20062008 and 20072009 fiscal years for services to us and our subsidiaries (directors’ fees (jetons de presence) paid for attending meetings of boards of directors of our companyCompany or subsidiaries):


Director

Directors’ fees paid by Veolia Environnement

(in euros)

Directors’ fees paid by Controlled Companies

(in euros)

Directors’ fees paid by
Veolia Environnement
(in euros)

Directors’ fees paid by
Controlled Companies
(in euros)

2007

2006

2007

2006

2009

2008

2009

2008

Jean Azéma

25,800*

48,250

0

Jean Azéma***

36,660*

0

Daniel Bouton

50,000

48,250

0

50,000

0

Pierre-André de Chalendar

20,055*

N/A

0

N/A

Jean-François Dehecq

40,000

15,495

0

40,000

0

Augustin de Romanet de Beaune**

20,000

n.a.

0

n.a.

Augustin de Romanet de Beaune***

40,000

0

Jean-Marc Espalioux

57,500

48,250

0

53,320*

60,000

0

Paul-Louis Girardot

57,500

48,250

48,155

48,535

60,000

48,337

Philippe Kourilsky

55,000

38,250

0

60,000

0

Serge Michel

80,000

76,250

11,555

10,025

80,000

6,763

6,955

Baudoin Prot

40,000

38,250

0

Baudouin Prot

30,000

40,000

0

Georges Ralli

40,000

38,250

0

36,660*

40,000

0

Paolo Scaroni***

24,000

0

0

Paolo Scaroni

40,000

30,500**

0

Louis Schweitzer

50,000

48,250

0

50,000

0

Murray Stuart***

94,500

84,188

0

*

After withholding in application of the attendance rules adopted by the board of directors (see below).

**

Appointment by the board of directors of March 29, 2007 approved by the combined general shareholders’ meeting of May 10, 2007.

***

Net amount after tax withholdings.

n.a.: not applicable

Murray Stuart

120,000

91,500**

0


N/A: Not applicable

*

Net of amounts withheld pursuant to the attendance rules adopted by the Board of Directors (see below).

**

Net amounts paid after tax withholding. Mr. Murray Stuart resigned from his position as director effective December 31, 2009. He was replaced by Esther Koplowitz, who was temporarily appointed to that position by the Board of Directors on December 17, 2009, effective January 1, 2010.

***

At the request of the beneficiaries, the entire amount of directors’ fees was paid directly to Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations and to Groupama SA..


N/A: Not applicable

*

Net of amounts withheld pursuant to the attendance rules adopted by the Board of Directors (see below).

**

Net amounts paid after tax withholding. Mr. Murray Stuart resigned from his position as director effective December 31, 2009. He was replaced by Esther Koplowitz, who was temporarily appointed to that position by the Board of Directors on December 17, 2009, effective January 1, 2010.

***

At the request of the beneficiaries, the entire amount of directors’ fees was paid directly to Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations and to Groupama SA..


In addition to the directors’ fees above, we paid €5,951 and €7,935 respectively to Messrs. Arthur Laffer and Francis Mayer for their service as directors, representing the remainder of the directors’ fees for the fiscal year 2006 paid at the beginning of 2007.


Total Amount and Division of Directors’ Fees


The total annual amountPursuant to a proposal of fees to be paid to our directors set at €600,000 by the Board of Directors, the general shareholders’ meeting held on April 30, 2003, was not modified until 2006.  However, followingof May 7, 2009 increased the recommendations of the nominations and compensation committee, our board of directors decided in March 2005 to modify the allocationtotal amount of directors’ fees fromto €825,000 (amount calculated on the basis of fifteen directors) for the 2009 fiscal year 2005 onwards.  



114



Back to Contents


On May 11, 2006, following recommendations by our board of directors, the shareholders’ meeting increased to €770,000 the total fees to be paid to directors from fiscal year 2006.year. The proposed increase was designedintended to take into account the specific duties incumbent upon committee membersthe Board’s Advisory Committees (in particular, thosethe Accounts and Audit Committee), the appointment of the accounts and audit committee)an additional director and to align our group’s practicesthe amount of directors’ fees with those of other companies included in the CAC 40 that are also listed in the United States. The total amount of directors’ fees for the previous year was €770,000.

At its meeting of March 28, 2006, the board of directors decided to allocate, for the 2006 fiscal year, the Board of Directors decided to distribute the total amount as follows: €40,000 of this amount to theBoard members, of the board, €50,000 to theBoard members of the board who are also members of a committee, €80,000 to the chairmanChairman of the nominationsNominations and compensation committeeCompensation Committee and €120,000 to the chairmanChairman of the accountsAccounts and audit committee.Audit Committee.

The €770,000 total amount was not modified in 2007. However, at

136



Back to Contents


At its meeting of March 29, 2007, for the board2007 fiscal year, the Board of directorsDirectors decided on a new distributionto distribute the amount of directors’ fees among directors taking into accountfor the creation of the strategic research, innovation and sustainable development committee. The board thus decided to allocatefiscal year, set at €770,000, as follows: €60,000 to the chairmanChairman of the strategic research, innovationStrategic, Research, Innovation and sustainable development committeeSustainable Development Committee and €60,000 to the other two other members of the strategic committeeStrategic Committee who are also members of the accountsAccounts and audit committeeAudit Committee for their seatduties on these two committees.Committees. Otherwise, the distribution remainsremained unchanged. TheAt its meeting of March 24, 2009, the Board of Directors decided to maintain this distribution. Therefore, the directors’ fees for 2007 will thus bethe 2009 fiscal year were distributed as follows:

Board member: €40,000

Board member and committee member: €50,000€40,000;

Member of the accountsBoard and audit committeeof one Committee: €50,000;

Members of the Accounts and Audit Committee and of the strategic research, innovationResearch and sustainable development committee: €60,000Innovation Committee: €60,000;

Chairman of the strategic research, innovationNominations and sustainable development committee: €60,000Compensation Committee: €80,000;

Chairman of the nominationsAccounts and compensation committee: €80,000Audit Committee: €120,000;

Chairman of the accountsResearch and audit committee: €120,000Innovation Committee: €60,000.

SinceAt its meeting of March 24, 2010, the Board of Directors decided to maintain the distribution rules described above for the 2010 fiscal year. This distribution arrangement will be reviewed after the general shareholders’ meeting of May 7, 2010 based on changes made to the composition of the Board of Directors.

Furthermore, since the 2006 fiscal year, the boardBoard has conditioned payment of a part of the directors’ fees to which each director is entitled (whether or not they are committee members) on their attendance at Board of Directors’ meetings. Thus, since 2006, the payment of partone-half of each director’s annual fees (i.e., €20,000) has been conditioned on each director’s actual attendance at a minimum of six Board meetings per year. If applicable, this one-half of each director’s fees is reduced in proportion to the number of absences.

In accordance with a proposal of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, at its meeting held on December 17, 2009, the Board of Directors decided to modify the rules for withholding payment of directors’ fees based on the directors’ attendance at Board meetings. The new rules apply as of January 1, 2010.

This new system, which is now applied by nearly all CAC 40 companies instead of the system whereby directors’ fees are withheld, consists of paying an “attendance bonus”. Under the system adopted, each director is paid a fixed portion, equal to one-half of the amount of directors’ fees owedper director, and a variable portion in proportion to each director (whether they are committee members or not) on theiractual attendance at boardBoard meetings. Henceforth, the bonus for attendance at each meeting will be calculated by dividing this variable component by the actual number of directors meeting. Since 2006,Board meetings held during the paymentyear (participation via means of half of the annual amount of directors’ fees of a board member (that is,  €20,000) is conditioned on the attendance of each director at a minimum of six meetings of the board per year, this amount being reduced proportionatelytelecommunication counts as attendance).



137



Back to any absences. In 2007, amounts were withheld out of fees paid to certain directors according to the attendance rules described above based on their participation in board meetings in 2006.Contents

At their meeting of March 25, 2008, the board of directors decided to maintain the same total amount of directors’ fees for 2008 and to maintain the distribution division described above.

Executive Committee Compensation


The aggregate amount of compensation paid toAll members of our executive committeethe Executive Committee in office on December 31, 2009, including Antoine Frérot, in 2007 other than our chairmanhis capacity as Chief Executive Officer of the Water Division (with the exception of Henri Proglio, in his capacity as Chairman and chief executive officer, for servicesChief Executive Officer), received aggregate gross compensation of €4,746,062, compared with €5,664,246 in all capacities was €4,269,519, of which €2,160,041 represented the fixed portion of 2007 compensation and €2,109,478 represented the variable portion of compensation relating to the 2006 fiscal year which was paid in the first half of 2007.2008.

The table below sets forthshows the totalaggregate gross compensation (includingpaid to the members of the Company’s Executive Committee in 2007, 2008 and 2009, with the exception of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. This amount includes fixed and variable compensation)compensation paid by Veolia Environnement, in-kind benefits and directors’ fees received by Executive Committee members in consideration for the directors’ positions they hold with companies of the Veolia Environnement Group in France and outside France.

(in euros)

Total fixed
compensation

Total
variable
compensation

Directors’ fees
paid by Group
companies

In-kind benefits

Total
compensation

Compensation paid in 2007

2,160,041

2,109,478(1)

203,308

13,910

4,486,737

Compensation paid in 2008

2,860,052

2,576,131(2)

208,545

19,518

5,664,246

Compensation paid in 2009

3,326,648

1,238,406(3)

158,600

22,408

4,746,062


(1)

Variable portion for the 2006 fiscal year, paid in 2007.

(2)

Variable portion for the 2007 fiscal year, paid in 2008.

(3)

Variable portion for the 2008 fiscal year, paid in 2009.


Contrary to the previous fiscal year, in which profit sharing of €38,416 for 2007 was paid in 2008, no profit sharing for 2008 was paid in 2009.

Retirement Plans

There is no contract between the members of our executive committeethe Board of Directors and the Company or its subsidiaries that provides for the payment of benefits or compensation owed or that may be owed in the event such member ceases or changes his employment with the Company or its subsidiaries, other than our chairman and chief executive officer from 2005the supplementary defined benefits group pension plan described below.

In accordance with the recommendations of the AFEP-MEDEF consolidated corporate governance code of December 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors at its meeting of December 17, 2009 took note that, effective January 1, 2010, Mr. Antoine Frérot’s employment contract, which was suspended on November 27, 2009 when he was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Environnement, would be terminated (under French corporate governance principles, Chief Executive Officers work without employment contracts). It should be noted that the termination of Mr. Antoine Frérot’s employment contract causes him to 2007:lose the right under the collective bargaining agreement to receive compensation for his seniority within the Group (over 19 years).

(in euros)

Fixed compensation

Variable compensation

Total

compensation

Compensation paid in 2005

2,393,989

1,539,360*

3,933,349

Compensation paid in 2006

2,431,494

1,950,000**

4,381,494

Compensation paid in 2007

2,160,041

2,109,478***

4,269,519

*

Variable compensation for the 2004 fiscal year and paid in 2005.

**

Variable compensation for the 2005 fiscal year and paid in 2006.

***

Variable compensation for the 2006 fiscal year and paid in 2007.



115138



Back to Contents


Pursuant to a proposal of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, at its meeting held on December 17, 2009, the Board of Directors decided to award Mr. Antoine Frérot compensation in the event of his termination as Chief Executive Officer, in accordance with the provisions of the “TEPA” Act (Article L 225-42-1 of the French Commercial Code). Such compensation is conditioned on compliance with performance requirements, and is excluded if he is entitled to a retirement pension under the supplementary defined benefits group pension plan set up for the members of the Company’s Executive Committee or if he accepts another position within the Veolia Environnement Group. Payment of this compensation is limited to situations of dismissal, non-renewal of his position or “forced departure in connection with a change of control or strategy”. In additionaccordance with the AFEP-MEDEF consolidated corporate governance code, the maximum amount of this termination compensation is twice the amount of total annual gross compensation (excluding directors’ fees and in-kind benefits), including the fixed portion of compensation for the last fiscal year (“Fixed Portion”) and the average variable portion of compensation (“Variable Portion”) paid for the last three fiscal years ended before the termination of the Chief Executive Officer (“Reference Compensation”). The amount and the fixed and variable components of this termination compensation both depend on meeting the performance objectives applied to calculate his annual variable compensation. The amount of this termination compensation is equal to twice the sum of (1) the Variable Portion of his Reference Compensation (the average of the last three fiscal years) and (2) the Fixed Portion of his Reference Compensation (last fiscal year), adjusted by a “Performance Rate” equal to the above compensation, a profit-sharing paymentverage percentage of €30,000the target bonus (also called “base bonus” or meeting 100% of annual objectives) met over the last three fiscal years ended before the termination of his position. In the event that Mr. Antoine Frérot is terminated as Chief Executive Officer before it is possible to calculate the Reference Compensation or the average Performance Rate over the last three fiscal years ended, these indicators will be calculated over the last one or two fiscal years, as the case may be, ended before the date of Mr. Antoine Frérot’s termination as Chief Executive Officer.

Moreover, the Company and its subsidiaries do not book provisions or record any amount for purposes of paying pensions, retirement or other benefits to the members of the Board of Directors listed in respectItem 6, with the exception of the Chairman of the Board of Directors in connection with his former position as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.

Supplementary Defined Premium Retirement Plan

In the 2009 fiscal year, Mr. Henri Proglio, in his capacity as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Antoine Frérot, in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer, were beneficiaries of the supplementary defined premiums group pension plan that covers all of the Group’s executive managers. In connection with the change in his position as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Henri Proglio ceased to be a member of this plan during the 2009 fiscal year. As a result of the termination of Mr. Antoine Frérot’s employment contract effective January 1, 2010, Mr. Frérot ceased being a member of the plan on that date.

In 2009, under this supplementary defined premiums group pension plan, Veolia Environnement paid a premium of €8,005 on behalf of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and a premium of €9,606 on behalf of the Chief Executive Officer.

Supplementary Defined Benefits Retirement Plan

Starting in the 2006 fiscal year, was paid in June 2007.

Directors’ fees tothe Company set up a supplementary defined benefits group pension plan for the members of the executive committee of our company in office in 2007 totaled €203,308 as result of their positions within companies of the Veolia Environnement Group in France and abroad.

In 2007, none of our directors or executiveCompany’s Executive Committee (salaried category 9 management employees, including corporate officers werewho are parties to contracts with us or our subsidiaries that provided for the award of benefits upon termination of theira suspended employment other than the supplementary retirement plan described below.

Supplementary Retirement Plan

At its meeting of September 15, 2005, our board of directors decided to establish a supplementary retirement plan with defined benefits, starting from the fiscal year 2006, for the chairman and chief executive officer and other members of the executive committee,contract), in line with the practices of other companies listedgroups included in the CAC 40.

This supplementary retirementpension plan beingis a regulated agreement subject to the new provisions of Article L.225-42-1L. 225-42-1 of the French Commercial Code,Code. Accordingly, it was presented for authorization and approved at the annual general shareholders’ meeting of May 11, 2006.



139



Back to Contents


The supplementary retirementpension plan, whose financing is outsourced to an insurance company, has the following characteristics:

aA specific regimeplan that takes into account the cancellation following the separation of the groupssupplementary pension plan for the benefit of the Group’s executive managers after the split-up of the Vivendi and Veolia Environnement groups and the loss of the retirement plan from which Group executives benefited untilseniority they had acquired through December 31, 2002 and the acquired seniority as employees of the former principal shareholder of the Company, Compagnie(Compagnie Générale des Eaux, (later namedwhich became Vivendi Universal and thenwas thereafter renamed Vivendi);

a retirement benefitAn additional plan that is in addition toseparate from other retirement benefits, acquiredpensions, based on seniority (a minimum of five years’ seniority and two years’ seniority as a functionmember of seniority, which isthe Executive Committee) and capped at 25% of covered compensation (for 25 years ofyears’ seniority);

aA limit on total retirement benefits fixedreceived set at 50%a maximum of 50% of covered compensation (the average of the last three periods of compensation).

Salaried management employees and senior executive management acquire a potential right to an annual retirement pension calculated as a percentage of their reference compensation up to an amount equal to sixty times the annual Social Security maximum.

In accordance with legal requirements, the benefits of this supplementary group pension plan are conditioned on the member’s completion of his career, whether he is a salaried management employee or holds a senior executive management position with Veolia Environnement.

In March 2009 (approved by the general shareholders’ meeting of May 7, 2009), the rules and regulations of this plan were amended following the Company’s adoption of provisions bringing it into conformity with the provisions of the AFEP-MEDEF consolidated corporate governance code recommending the termination of the employment contract of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. To ensure that the termination of the employment contracts of senior executive management was not detrimental to them, it was decided to amend the rules and regulations governing this plan in order to clarify the eligibility requirements of this supplementary defined benefits group pension plan for senior executive management, whether or not parties to an employment contract.

After obtaining the opinion of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, at its meetings held on October 21 and December 17, 2009, the Board of Directors decided to make additional amendments to the rules and regulations governing the supplementary defined benefits group pension plan in order inter alia to include as beneficiaries members who permanently end their professional career after the age of 55 without subsequently engaging in other professional activity in accordance with legal requirements, and to entitle the beneficiaries to choose to defer the payment date of their retirement pension after exercising their retirement rights and to choose between the payment of a survivor’s pension to the surviving spouse and the payment of guaranteed annuities to any person of their choice. Lastly, the annual reference compensation is now based on the average of the three most recent compensations received.highest years of gross annual compensation from among the last ten years. However, this reference compensation is limited to sixty times the annual Social Security maximum.

As of December 31, 2007, and based on current estimates, the total cost of this retirement plan (current value of future benefits orValeur Actuelle des Prestations Futures) is expected to amount to €27.7 million for the members of the executive committee, of which €11.9 million relate to the chairman and chief executive officer. This is subject to the beneficiaries’ continued service with our company until the time that they retire, inIn accordance with the provisions of Articles L. 225-38 and L. 225-40 of the French “Fillon” law.  Commercial Code, on the basis of a special report prepared by the statutory auditors, the general shareholders’ meeting to be held on May 7, 2010 will be asked to approve these changes to the extent they concern senior executive management.

The amount booked as provisions (cost of services rendered) for this supplementary group pension plan for 2009 is equal to the amount shown as post-employment benefits in note 39 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements (see below).

Mr. Henri Proglio, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, is no longer a member of this group plan. He chose to exercise his retirement rights on November 1, 2009 after having acquired more than 37 years of seniority within the Group. Due to Henri Proglio’s very lengthy period of service to the Company and the rights acquired as a result of this seniority, as of this date, the annual amount of his lifetime annuity is estimated to be 37% of his annual reference compensation.



140



Back to Contents


In accordance with the recommendations of the AFEP-MEDEF consolidated corporate governance code, the value of the benefits provided by the supplementary pension plan is taken into account when setting the Chief Executive Officer’s total compensation. Furthermore, the group of potential beneficiaries is not limited only to senior executive management, but also includes salaried executive managers who are members of the Company’s Executive Committee. Each year, the increase in potential rights is equal to only a limited percentage of the beneficiaries’ compensation. Thus, in the case of the “specific” plan, which takes into account seniority acquired until December 31, 2002 with the Company’s principal shareholder (Compagnie Générale des Eaux, which became Vivendi Universal and was thereafter renamed Vivendi), potential rights represent 0.4% of the beneficiary’s reference compensation per year of seniority. In the case of the “additional” plan, which takes into account seniority acquired after December 31, 2002, potential rights represent 10% of the beneficiary’s reference compensation after five years’ seniority, including at least two years’ seniority as a member of the Company’s Executive Committee, and then 0.75% of his reference compensation per additional year of seniority. The reference period used to calculate benefits is average compensation calculated over several years and excludes compensation paid at the time of employment termination or retirement, as well as any other type of extraordinary compensation. Lastly, provided he is still with the Company at the time of his departure or retirement in accordance with legal requirements, based on his seniority (over 19 years), at the end of December 2009 the hypothetical annual amount of the lifetime annuity of Mr. Antoine Frérot, the Chief Executive Of ficer, is equal to 30% of his annual reference compensation.

Details of the Compensation Paid to Our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


Principles and criteria used to determine fixed and variable components of the compensation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer before the separation of the offices of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (on November 27, 2009)

In accordance with the recommendation of the Nominations and Compensation paidCommittee, at its meeting held on March 24, 2010, the Board of Directors decided to Mr. Proglio in 2007 was determined according to terms proposed by the nominations and compensation committee and approved by our board of directors.

During 2007, Mr. Proglio receivedkeep the fixed portion of the compensation paid for the 2009 fiscal year to Mr. Henri Proglio, in his capacity as the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, at the same level as for 2008 and 2007, i.e., €992,000.

In accordance with the recommendation of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, at its meeting held on December 17, 2009, the Board of Directors decided (i) that the fixed portion of the compensation paid to Mr. Henri Proglio for 2007,the performance of his duties as wellthe Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, would be prorated until the effective date of his appointment as Chairman of the Board of Directors, but (ii) that the variable portion of his compensation for the 2006 fiscal year paid in 2007, which was determined at the boardperformance of directors’ meeting of March 29, 2007. He also received other benefits (avantages en nature), as wellhis duties as the directors’ fees to which he was entitled as a director of Veolia EnvironnementCompany’s Chairman and certain of its subsidiaries.

Fixed Portion of 2007 CompensationChief Executive Officer would be calculated over the entire 2009 fiscal year.

The board of directors followed the recommendation of the nominations and compensation committee, and decided during the meeting held on March 29, 2007 to increase the fixed portion of Mr. Proglio’s compensation, which had not been changed since 2005,method adopted for the 2007 fiscal year to an amount of €992,000.  

Variable Portion of 2006 and 2007 Compensation

Based on the recommendations of the nominations and compensation committee, 70% ofcalculating the variable portion of 2006the compensation of the Company’s Chairman and 2007Chief Executive Officer for the 2009 fiscal year is in accordance with a proposal made by the Nominations and Compensation Committee. Accordingly, since the 2003 fiscal year, the variable portion of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s compensation ishas been divided into a quantitative portion of 70%, based on the satisfaction of various performance criteria that have been pre-determinedset beforehand by the boardBoard of directors, whileDirectors, and a qualitative portion of 30% determined by the Board of Directors.

Variable compensation for 2008:

In accordance with the proposals of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, at its meeting held on March 25, 2008, the Board of Directors chose the following performance indicators to determine the quantitative portion of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s variable compensation for 2008, using the 2008 budget and 2008 performances, compared with those for 2007, as the bases for measuring the objectives: operating cash flows, recurring net earnings per share and the Group’s pre-tax ROCE. The 70% quantitative portion of variable compensation is weighted as follows: 30% is based on qualitative performance as determined by the board.



116



Back to Contents


Variable compensationGroup’s operating cash flows and 40% on net earnings per share and pre-tax ROCE. Applying these formulas and in light of results for 2006: Based on the recommendations of the nominations and compensation committee, the board of directors decided2008, at its meeting of March 28, 2006 that24, 2009, the performance indicators (under IFRS) to be used by the board in determining the quantitative portionBoard of the chairman and chief executive officer’s variable compensation in respect of the 2006 fiscal year, based on the objectives of the 2006 budget and achievements, would be: adjusted operating income and adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent. At its meeting of March 29, 2007, the boardDirectors awarded Mr. Henri Proglio €1,275,000, that is, 100% of the variable portion of his compensation for the 2006 fiscal year, based on the application of formulas and taking into account results obtained.   

Variable compensation for 2007: Based on the recommendations of the nominations and compensation committee, the board of directors decided at its meeting of March 29, 2007 that the performance indicators (under IFRS) to be used by the board in determining the quantitative portion of the chairman and chief executive officer’s variable compensation in respect of the 2007 fiscal year, based on the objectives of the 2007 budget and achievements in 2007 compared to those in 2006, would be: the adjusted operating income and the adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent, in equal measure. Due to the capital increase completed in July 2007, which automatically increased net income, the board of directors decided at its meeting of March 25, 2008 to replace this indicator with the adjusted net income per share, as proposed by the appointments and compensation committee.  Th e board awarded Mr. Henri Proglio €1,423,020€519,188 as the variable portion of his compensationcompensatio n for the 2007 fiscal year, based on the application of formulas and taking into account results achieved.  This amount represented an increase of 11.6% compared to the variable portion of his compensation in 2006.2008.

Other Benefits

In addition to the fixed and variable compensation described above, Mr. Proglio received benefits in 2007 totaling €2,954, relating to use of a company car.

Directors’ fees paid by Veolia Environnement and its subsidiaries

In 2007, our chairman and chief executive officer received gross directors’ fees from us totaling €40,000, which were paid in respect of the last quarter of 2006 and the first three quarters of 2007 (fees due for the last quarter of 2007 were paid in January 2008).  Directors’ fees paid to Mr. Proglio are subject to French taxes (CSG/CRDS deduction) that are withheld from the amounts paid to Mr. Proglio.

Mr. Proglio also received directors’ fees with respect to offices he holds in our subsidiaries in both France and abroad totaling €64,079.

Variation between Mr. Proglio’s Compensation from 2005 to 2007

The table below sets forth total gross compensation paid to Mr. Proglio from 2005 to 2007 (including fixed and variable compensation, directors’ fees and benefits).

 (in euros)

Various compensation

Directors’ fees paid by subsidiaries

Benefits(1)

Total gross compensation

Fixed

Variable

Directors’ fees paid by VE

Compensation paid in 2005

944,996

850,000(2)

34,000

70,912

2,616

1,902,524

Compensation paid in 2006

944,996

1,062,500(3)

38,250

66,382

2,666

2,114,794

Compensation paid in 2007

992,000

1,275,000(4)

40,000

64,079

2,954

2,374,033

(1)

Related to a company car.

(2)

Variable compensation due in respect of the 2004 fiscal year and paid in 2005.

(3)

Variable compensation due in respect of the 2005 fiscal year and paid in 2006.

(4)

Variable compensation due in respect of the 2006 fiscal year and paid in 2007.



117141



Back to Contents


Retirement PlanVariable compensation for 2009:

In accordance with the proposals of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, at its meeting held on March 24, 2009, the Board of Directors decided to modify the criteria that had been used in 2008 to determine the quantitative portion of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer’s variable compensation in order to take into account the Group’s objectives and the economic climate. In line with the Group’s objectives announced to the market, which were positive free cash flow and operating cash flow after deduction of net investments of €2 billion in 2009, the sole criteria retained was the Group’s level of operating cash flow after investments, net of sales.

Applying these criteria, and in light of the fact that the objectives set for the 2009 fiscal year had been exceeded, at its meeting of March 24, 2010, the Board of Directors decided to award Mr. Henri Proglio benefits from a collective supplementary retirement planan amount of €1,202,216 for the quantitative and qualitative portions of his variable compensation for 2009.

Principles applied to determine the compensation of senior executive management after the separation of the offices of Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer (since November 27, 2009)

The policy for determining the compensation of senior executive management was changed during the 2009 fiscal year in order to take into account the separation of the offices of Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer, which occurred on November 27, 2009.

In accordance with a proposal of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, at its meetings held on December 17, 2009 and March 24, 2010, the Veolia Environnement Board of Directors adopted the following compensation principles and provisions:

Chairman of the Board of Directors

In accordance with the recommendation of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, at its meeting held on December 17, 2009, the Board of Directors decided to pay the Chairman of the Board of Directors fixed subscription (cotisations définies) that we provides to our senior management, andannual compensation (without a variable component) in the collective supplementary retirement plan with defined benefits (prestations définies) put in place by our companyamount of €450,000, as of the time of his appointment, i.e., November 27, 2009. At that meeting, Mr. Henri Proglio decided to waive the directors’ fees to which he was entitled as a director.

On January 21, 2010, Mr. Henri Proglio stated that he would henceforth also waive payment of his fixed annual compensation.

Chief Executive Officer

Fixed compensation and benefits

Pursuant to a recommendation of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, at its meeting held on December 17, 2009, the Board of Directors decided to set the Chief Executive Officer’s annual fixed compensation at €750,000 as of November 27, 2009, the effective date of his appointment (without any variable portion in that capacity for 2009).

In addition to this compensation, the Chief Executive Officer is entitled to a company car and to social security benefits equivalent to those of employees (sickness, disability). Furthermore, he is eligible for the supplementary defined benefits group pension plan set up in 2006 for category 9 management employees and senior executive management of Veolia Environnement.

Variable compensation for 2009 and 2010

Pursuant to a recommendation of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, at its meeting held on December 17, 2009, the Board of Directors decided that the variable portion of the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation for the 2009 fiscal year for our chairman and chief executive officer andwould be the membersvariable compensation in connection with his previous position as Chief Executive Officer of the Water Division, calculated over the entire 2009 fiscal year.

The methods used to calculate the variable portion of the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation for the 2010 fiscal year, which were adopted by the Board of Directors on March 24, 2010, are discussed below.



142



Back to Contents


Total compensation paid to Mr. Henri Proglio for his positions as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and as Chairman of the Board of Directors

In the 2009 fiscal year, Mr. Henri Proglio was paid compensation totaling €1,509,477. Mr. Proglio received the pro rata share of the fixed portion of his compensation for 2009 for his position as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (€892,077), as well as the variable portion of his compensation for his position as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer for the 2008 fiscal year, which was paid in 2009 pursuant to a decision adopted by the Board of Directors on March 24, 2009 (€519,188). Lastly, he received in-kind benefits and directors’ fees for positions held with the Company and with other companies of the Group.

The table below summarizes compensation of all types. Further information concerning stock subscription or purchase options and performance shares are discussed in our Chapter 17 of our Document de Refence filed with the FrenchAutorité des marchés financiers and available on our website. This compensation is detailed in the tables hereinafter.

Table Summarizing Compensation, Options and Shares Granted to Mr. Henri Proglio for 2008 and 2009

(in euros)

2008 Fiscal Year

2009 Fiscal Year

Compensation owed for the fiscal year

1,617,207

2,231,790

Value of options granted during the fiscal year

0

0

Value of performance shares granted during the fiscal year

0

0

TOTAL

1,617,207

2,231,790


Table Summarizing Compensation Owed and Paid to Mr. Henri Proglio

 

2008 Fiscal Year

2009 Fiscal Year

 

Amounts owed
for the fiscal year

Amounts paid
during the fiscal year

Amounts owed
for the fiscal year

Amounts paid
during the fiscal year

Fixed compensation (for his position as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer)

992 000

992 000

892 077

892 077

Variable compensation (for his position as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer)

519 188(1)

1 423 020 (2)

1 202 216(3)

519 188

Fixed compensation for his position as Chairman of the Board of Directors

N/A

N/A

39 285

0

Extraordinary compensation

0

0

0

0

Directors’ fees

    

• Paid by Veolia

Environnement

40 000

40 000(4)

40 000

40 000(4)

• Paid by controlled companies(5)

62 969

62 969

55 417

55 417

In-kind benefits(6)

3 050

3 050

2 795

2 795

TOTAL

1,617,207

2,521,039

2,231,790

1,509,477


(1)

Variable portion for 2008, paid in 2009.

(2)

Variable portion for 2007, paid in 2008.

(3)

Variable portion for 2009, to be paid in 2010.

(4)

Directors’ fees paid for his position as director for the fourth quarter of the 2008 fiscal year and the first three quarters of the 2009 fiscal year. Fees for the fourth quarter of the 2009 fiscal year were paid in January 2010.

(5)

Directors’ fees received for director’s positions held with other companies of the Veolia Environnement Group, in France and outside France.

(6)

Company car provided.



143



Back to Contents


Total compensation paid to Mr. Antoine Frérot for his positions as Chief Executive Officer of the Water Division and, as of November 27, 2009, Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Environnement (after separation of the offices of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer)

Pursuant to the principles and criteria adopted by the Board of Directors on December 17, 2009, the Chief Executive Officer’s annual fixed compensation was set at €750,000 as of November 27, 2009, the effective date of Mr. Antoine Frérot’s appointment (including €68,453 for 2009 paid in 2010).

The table below summarizes compensation of all types. This compensation is then detailed in the tables hereinafter.

Table Summarizing Total Compensation, Options and Shares Granted to Mr. Antoine Frérot for 2009

(in euros)

2009 Fiscal Year

Total compensation owed for the fiscal year

858 970

Value of options granted during the fiscal year

0

Value of performance shares granted during the fiscal year

0

TOTAL

858 970


Table Summarizing Compensation Owed and Paid to Mr. Antoine Frérot

 

2009 Fiscal Year

 

Amounts owed
for the fiscal year

Amounts paid
during the fiscal year

Fixed compensation (for his position as Chief Executive Officer of the Water Division)

389 193(1)

425 000

Variable compensation (for his position as Chief Executive Officer of the Water Division)

369 200(3)

184 500(2)

Fixed compensation for his position as Chief Executive Officer of the Company (as of November 27, 2009)

68 453(4)

0(4)

Extraordinary compensation

0

0

Directors’ fees

  

• Paid by Veolia Environnement

0

0

• Paid by controlled companies(5)

30 144

30 144

In-kind benefits(6)

1 980

1 980

TOTAL

858 970

641 624


(1)

For the period between January 1 and November 26, 2009 inclusive.

(2)

Variable portion for 2008, paid in 2009.

(3)

Variable portion for 2009, to be paid in 2010.

(4)

For the period between November 27 and December 31, 2009.

(5)

Directors’ fees received for director’s positions held with other companies of the Veolia Environnement Group, in France and outside France.

(6)

Company car provided.





144



Back to Contents


Compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and Objectives for 2010

In accordance with the recommendation of the Nominations and Compensation Committee, at its meeting held on March 24, 2010, the Board of Directors decided to maintain, for the 2010 fiscal year, the fixed portion of Mr. Antoine Frérot’s compensation at the level set in December 2009, i.e., €750,000. To determine the variable portion of the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation for the 2010 fiscal year, the Board of Directors decided to retain the allocation of a quantitative portion of 70% and a qualitative portion of 30%.

In line with the Group’s objectives, which related to cash flow and operating income (in each case subject to certain adjustments) in 2009, the criteria applied to determine the quantitative portion of the Chief Executive Officer’s variable compensation are meeting budgetary objectives concerning (i) first, operating cash flow after deducting net investments, adjusted by the positive or negative change in working capital requirements (weighted at 35%) and (ii) second, the gain in adjusted operating income (weighted at 35%).

Details concerning stock subscription or purchase options that may have been granted to and exercised by the Chief Executive Officer during the 2009 fiscal year, as well as the Chief Executive Officer’s obligation to keep the shares obtained by exercising the subscription or purchase options, are described above.under the headings “Share Subscription and Purchase Options” and “Share Ownership” below.

Details of the options awarded to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and exercised by them in 2009

For a description of the options awarded to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and exercised by them in 2009, see “Share Subscription and Purchase Options” below.

Obligations concerningof the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer to retain shares that result from the exercise of share subscription and shareor purchase options granted to(Article L.225-185 and L.225-197-1 of the president and chief executive officer and granting of free shares.French Commercial Code).

The law of December 30, 2006, relating to the development of the participation of employees in stock ownership plans, introduced new measures included in article L.225-185 of the French Commercial Code, regarding share subscription options or share purchase options granted to legal representatives. The boardBoard of directorsDirectors must decide whether the options cannot be exercised by the parties before the end of their functions, or must fix the quantity of shares held following the exercise of options which they have to conserve until the end of their functions. The same constraints are applicable to shares granted freely to the chairmanChairman and chief executive officerChief Executive Officer under Article L.225-197-1 of the Commercial Code. These provisions are applicable to plans implemented after the law cameentered into effect.force.

Following the publication of this law, the nominationsNominations and compensation committeeCompensation Committee performed a review of the provisions that may be applied to the next stock option plan for the benefit of the chairmanChairman and chief executive officer,Chief Executive Officer, and presented its conclusions to the boardBoard on March 29, 2007.

According toIn accordance with these recommendations, the boardBoard adopted internal rules pursuant to which Henri Proglio will have to form and retain a portfolio of our shares in proportion to the excess value, net of tax and financing, realized on the exercised options. In accordance with these regulations,rules, the presidentChairman and chief executive officerChief Executive Officer will hold a portfolio of the Company’s shares equal to 50% of the remaining shares issued by virtue of the exercise, after payment of taxes (taxation of the exercise value and corporate payments)social security withholding) and the financing cost of financing (number of options which it is necessary to exercise to finance the exercise price of the portfolio)portfolio and tax).

BecauseThis rule has not been applied in practice, as no options or bonus shares have been awarded since 2007.

The Board will study the policynew terms of granting free shares decided by our boardapplication now that the offices of directors during its meeting of March 29, 2007 did not include the granting of any sharesChairman and Chief Executive Officer are separated, if options are effectively awarded to the chairman and chief executive officer,Chief Executive Officer in the board did not define, for the chairman and chief executive officer any restrictions such as those applicablefuture.



145



Back to share subscription or purchase options.     Contents


BOARD PRACTICES


Following our reorganizationAfter the Company was converted into asociété anonymewith a boardBoard of directorsDirectors on April 30, 2003, our existing accounts, auditthe Accounts and commitments committeeAudit Committee and nominationsthe Nominations and compensation committeeCompensation Committee, and their respective internal rules and regulations, were retained and their charters adaptedmodified to meet the needsrequirements of the Company’s new boardBoard of directorsDirectors. In addition, at its meeting of our company.  On September 14, 2006, the boardCompany’s Board of directors of our company also formed a strategic research, innovationDirectors created the Strategy, Research, Innovation and sustainable development committee.Sustainable Development Committee.

Accounts and audit committeeAudit Committee

The accounts and audit committee’s duties as described in its internal charter, were updated during the meeting of the board of directors of May 11, 2006 in order toAccounts and Audit Committee, which take into account changes in U.S. laws and regulations applicable toconcerning the assessment of internal controls overof financial and accounting information.  information, were changed by the Board of Directors at its meeting of March 24, 2009 to take into account the Order (“ordonnance”) of December 8, 2008 that transposed the eighth directive on statutory audits of corporate financial statements into French law (directive 2006/43/EC), which will apply to the Company as of September 1, 2010.

This committee consists ofThe Accounts and Audit Committee has three to five members appointed along with its chairman, by our boardthe Board of directors based onDirectors pursuant to a recommendation made by the recommendationNominations and Compensation Committee. The Board appoints the Committee Chairman.

As of the nominationsdate of this annual report on Form 20-F, this Committee has four independent members in accordance with the requirements of the Board’s internal rules and compensation committee.

The committee consists of three members,1 all of whom are independent under the board’s charter2: Murray Stuart (chairman)regulations: Daniel Bouton (Chairman), Pierre-André de Chalendar,
Jean-Marc Espalioux and Paul-Louis Girardot.

The Board of Directors appointed Pierre-André de Chalendar as a member of the Accounts and Audit Committee effective May 7, 2009. Daniel Bouton was appointed a member of the Accounts and Audit Committee effective November 2, 2009, and he was appointed Chairman effective January 1, 2010, to replace Murray Stuart, who resigned his office as director effective December 31, 2009.

According to the committee’s charter,internal rules and regulations of the Accounts and Audit Committee, its members mustare required to be selectedchosen on the basis of their financial or accounting skills. At its meetingsexpertise and at least one Committee member must have specific financial or accounting expertise and be independent under the criteria specified in the Board’s internal rules and regulations. The Board of March 5, 2004Directors deemed Jean-Marc Espalioux and March 29, 2005, the board of directors determined that Messrs. Espalioux,Paul-Louis Girardot and Stuart qualified as “audit committeeto be financial experts”experts within the meaning of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act, given theiron the grounds that they possessed the expertise and experience and skills.

1  Because of his professional commitments, Mr. Jean Azéma asked to be dismissed from his position as memberrequired by that law. All of the committee in early 2007.

2  All of these committeeCommittee’s members are also deemedconsidered to be independent according tounder the criteria set forth in the Listed Company Manual of the New York Stock Exchange.Exchange Manual.

The Accounts and Audit Committee meets at the initiative of its Chairman or at the request of the Chairman of the Board of Directors, and at least five times a year, to review the periodic and annual financial statements before they are submitted to the Board of Directors. In 2009, the Accounts and Audit Committee met seven times (the same number of times as in 2008). In 2009, its members’ average attendance rate was 92.0% (compared to 85.7% in 2008).



118146



Back to Contents


The accounts and audit committee meets at least five times per year at the request of its chairman or the chairman of the board of directors in order to review the semi-annual and annual financial statements before they are presented to the board of directors. In 2007, the committee met six times.  The average attendance level at meetings in 2006 was 77.8%.

Duties

The accountsIn general, the Accounts and audit committee principally performsAudit Committee is responsible for monitoring issues concerning the following functions:preparation and control of accounting and financial information and, in particular, for monitoring the integrity of the Group’s financial statements and the process for preparing financial information, as well as the effectiveness of internal control and risk management systems concerning financial and accounting information. In this regard, the duties of the Committee are:

Regarding accounting matters, the committeeCommittee, (i) reviews, alongtogether with the statutory auditors, reviews the appropriatenessrelevance and consistency of the accounting methods applied inused to prepare the preparation of thecorporate and consolidated financial statements, and examines whether significantmajor transactions have beenare adequately treated,reported on a Group-wide level and reviews the procedures for collecting financial and accounting information; (ii) providesgives an opinion on the draft semi-annual and annual corporate and consolidated financial statements,statements; and (iii) meets, if necessary, withinterviews the statutory auditors, executive management and the financial officers to discuss various issues,officers. If the committee being entitled to meet with such persons outside ofCommittee wishes, these interviews may be held without the presence of our company’sthe Company’s executive management.

Regarding internal auditing, internal controls and internal control,risk management, the committeeCommittee (i) examines ourreviews the Group’s annual internal audit plan and, from time to time, receives a periodic summary of our group’sthe Group’s internal audit reports; and (ii) in connection with therespect to its evaluation of internal control procedures (as required by section(see Section 404 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act), from time to time, the committee periodicallyCommittee receives information from our company information regarding the Company concerning its internal control organization and the internal control procedures relating toregarding financial and accounting information; and, when needed, the committee meets when necessary(iii) interviews with the internal audit director to discussand internal control managers and it gives its opinion on the organizationmanner in which this work is organized; and (iv) receives an annual report from the Ethics Committee regarding the operation of internal audit.the financial and accounting whistleblowing system and, in conjunction with the Ethics Committee, ensures oversight of significant matters.

Regarding the supervision of our company’sCompany’s independent auditors, the committeeCommittee (i) examinesreviews on an annual basis the statutory auditors’ schedule of operations,planned work; (ii) meets as necessary withinterviews the statutory auditors and our company’s management, including itsthe managers in charge of finances, accounting and treasury officers, if needed outsidethe cash position, in certain cases, without the presence of our company’s management,the Company’s executive management; (iii) supervises the procedure for choosing statutory auditors and makes recommendations thereon; (iv) gives anits opinion onregarding the amount of the fees requested forby the exercise of legal audit missions, (iv)statutory auditors; (v) gives its prior approval for any audit-related services to be performed byactivities of the statutory auditors (v) remainsthat are strictly ancillary or directly complementary to their audit of the financial statements; and (vi) is informed of the amount offees that the fees paid by our companyCompany and ourthe Group pay to the auditorsstatutory auditor firm and the auditor’s network, and ensures that the amount of these payments does not call into question the independenceindepend ence of the statutory auditors and, (vi) supervises the procedure for selectingif necessary, reviews measures taken to reduce threats to the statutory auditors.  auditors’ independence.

Activities during 2007in 2009

In 2007,2009, as in previous years, the accountswork of the Accounts and audit committee completed its work withinAudit Committee was organized on the frameworkbasis of an annual program. The substanceMinutes of its meetings is included in minutesare prepared and the chairman of the committeeCommittee Chairman reports thereon to the boardBoard of directors. Directors.

In addition to examining our company’s quarterly,reviewing the semi-annual and annual financial statements, the committeereference document and the quarterly business reports, the Committee periodically reviewed the action plans regarding internal controls set up in 2009 and the progress of the work undertaken by our companythe Company in 2007 in order2009 to comply withevaluate its internal control requirements underprocedures, in accordance with the provisions of Section 404 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The committeeCommittee reviewed the synthesissummaries of the internal audit missionsaudits conducted in 2008 and programs for 2007the first half of 2009 and approved the internal audit program for 2008.2010. In addition, together with the Company’s managers, the Committee reviewed the key processes relevant to its duties: cash position and financing, off-balance sheet commitments, taxes, lawyers’ reports concerning major disputes and IT systems. The committeeCommittee was also reviewed, along with our company’s managers, key information which could affect its missions, including reports on cash flow, taxregularly informed of the progress of the deployment of the SAP management and legal matters, and information technology.internal control software. The committee alsoCommittee approved the duties and fees of our company’sthe statutory auditors for 2007the 2009 fiscal year and supervised the process through which KPMG SA was appointed statutory auditor, succeeding Salustro Reydel, as well asamount budgeted for their fees. The Committee performed a financial review of the rotation of partners of our statutory audit firms.  It also approved the 2008 budgetEnvironmental Services Division, and examined the organization of our Group’s risk managementtests for depreciating assets, fraud reports and the mappingreport on the work of major risks, as well as pending actionsthe Ethics Committee. Financial management made a presentation to the Committee regarding changes in accounting regulations, the control and investment planning processes and the 2008-2009 risk management program.

Group’s financing policy. The committee may meet with individualsCommittee examined possible changes to its duties following the regulation (“ordonnance”) dated December 8, 2008. The Committee proposed to the Board of Directors to amend its internal rules and experts outside our company if necessary.  It may also meet with our company’s financial officers or auditors outsideregulations and examined the presence of the chairman and chief executive officer. Accordingly, during 2007 the chairman and/or members of the committee met and communicated with our company’s senior executive vice president, the financial services director, the financial control director, the risk and internal audit director, the general secretary, the general counsel, the risks and markets director and the auditors.  The committee did not consult with any outside consultants in 2007.

Nominations and compensation committee

The nominations and compensation committee’s charter provides that the committee must consist of three to five members appointed, along with its chairman, by the board of directors upon the recommendation of the then current members of the nominations and compensation committee.  

The committee consists of three members, two of whom are independent (*) under the board’s charter: Serge Michel (chairman), Daniel Bouton (*) and Louis Schweitzer (*).Group’s updated whistleblowing procedure.



119147



Back to Contents


The nominationsCommittee may interview persons outside the Company if it deems such interviews of use to the performance of its duties. In addition, the Committee may consult outside experts. It may also interview the Company’s financial officers or the statutory auditors without the presence of the Chief Executive Officer. Accordingly, during the past fiscal year, the Chairman of the Accounts and compensation committeeAudit Committee and/or the Committee members interviewed and met with the Chief Finance Officer, the manager of the finance department, the financial control manager, the risks and markets manager, the financing and cash position manager, the internal controls manager, the Group’s internal audit manager, the Secretary General, the legal director, the risk management manager and the statutory auditors. The Committee did not use outside consultants in 2009.

Nominations and Compensation Committee

In accordance with its internal rules and regulations, the Nominations and Compensation Committee must have between three and five members, who are appointed by the Board of Directors pursuant to a proposition of the Nominations and Compensation Committee. The Committee members are appointed from among the directors who do not hold management positions. The Chairman of the Committee is appointed by the Board.

As of the date of this annual report on Form 20-F, this Committee has three members, two of whom are independent (*) on the basis of the criteria set forth in the Board’s internal rules and regulations: Serge Michel (Chairman), Daniel Bouton (*) and Louis Schweitzer (*).

The Nominations and Compensation Committee meets at the initiative of its Chairman or at the request of the Chairman of the Board of Directors, and at least twice a year atyear. In 2009, the request of its chairman or the chairman of the board of directors. In 2007, the committeeNominations and Compensation Committee met three times. Theeight times (compared to two times in 2008). Its members’ average attendance level at meetingsrate was 100%.

Duties

The nominationsmain duties of the Nominations and compensation committee principally performs the following functions:Compensation Committee are:

With respect to compensation, the committeeCommittee (i) studies and makes annual recommendations regarding the total compensation of corporate managers that are directors and, executive officersin particular, ensures that the rules and criteria governing the variable portion of compensation are consistent with the annual evaluation of their performances and the medium-term strategy and performance of the Company and the Group, as well as regarding retirementthe granting of in-kind corporate benefits, stock purchase or subscription options and free shares, pension plans, termination compensation and any other benefits to corporate managers that are directors, ensuring that all of these components are taken into account in evaluating and gives an opinion on compensation of principal executive officers and senior managers of our company,setting their overall compensation; (ii) proposes thea total amount and breakdown of directors’ fees to be paid to the Board of Directors, as well as the rules for the distribution thereof; (iii) advises Bo ard of Directors regarding the board of directors regardinggeneral policy and terms and conditions for granting stock option policiespurchase or subscription options, granting free shares and awards, (iv) is informedsetting up employee stock ownership plans, as well as the provisions for sharing the performances of the Company or Group with employees; (iv) makes recommendations to the Board concerning the granting of stock options and, if applicable, free shares to corporate officers, as well as with respect to the performance conditions applicable thereto; (v) makes recommendations to the Board concerning the obligation of corporate managers that are directors to keep shares obtained by exercising stock purchase or subscription options or, if applicable, free shares granted to them; and (vi) gives its opinion regarding the compensation policy forpaid to the Company’s principal executive officersmanagers who are not also directors of our company’s subsidiaries, and (v) examines all share capital increases reserved for employees.  the Company or of other companies of the Group.

With respect to nominations, the nominationsCommittee is charged with making recommendations regarding the future composition of the Company’s management bodies and, compensation committee makes recommendations with respect tomost importantly, is responsible for proposing corporate officers and a succession plan. It recommends the appointment of our directors, and executive officers and arranges for their succession. It also recommendsas well as the nomination of members and a chairman forChairman of each Committee of our committees.  The committee’s choices should reflect athe Board, striving to ensure diversity ofin experience and points of view, and ensurewhile making certain that the board remain objectiveBoard of Directors retains the necessary objectivity and independent with respect to aindependence vis-à-vis any specific shareholder or group of shareholders. The committee mustCommittee gives its opinion on the succession plan for the Company’s principal managers who are not directors. The Nominations and Compensation Committee strives to ensure that independent directors represent at least half(i) one-half of the membersBoard of the board of directors,Directors, (ii) two-thirds of the members of the accountsAccounts and audit committeeAudit Committee and half( iii) one-half of the members of the nominationsNominations and compensation committee.

Compensation Committee are independent directors. Each year, the nominationsNominations and compensation committee performs an evaluation, onCompensation Committee conducts a case-by-case basis,evaluation of each of the directors with regard to the independence criteria as set forth in the Board of each directorDirectors’ internal rules and regulations and makes recommendations on this subject to the Board of Directors in lightadvance of the criteria for independence mentioned in the board of directors’ charter and submits its proposals to the board of directors.  It also organizes and coordinates the required evaluation of the board’s functioning, and submits its opinion regarding the performance of our company’s executive management.

To perform its duties, the committee may interview different members of our company’s or our Group’s management.

Activities during 2007

In 2007, the nominations and compensation committee was dedicated to preparing recommendations and proposals to the board relating to the compensation of the chief executive officer (2007 fixed component and 2006 variable component) and the determination and distribution of director’s fees, as well as theBoard’s review of the proposals concerning the compensationsituation of our company’s executive committee members.

The committee also submitted an opinion to the board of directors on the policies relating to the award of stock options and free shares and on the resolutions submitted to the general shareholders’ meeting of May 10, 2007 relating to them. The committee also presented its conclusions and recommendations to the board of directors on the implementation of the new retention obligation for shares issued as a result of the exercise of stock options by the chairman and chief executive officer pursuant to the law of December 30, 2006 relating to the development of the participation of employees in stock ownership plans.

In addition, the committee made a proposal at the board of directors meeting of March 29, 2007 relating to the appointment of Mr. Augustin de Romanet de Beaune, the new chief executive officer of the Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations, as director replacing Mr. Francis Mayer.

Lastly, in 2007, the committee evaluated the independence of the directors and conducted a formal evaluation of the functioning of the board of directors, the conclusions of which were presented during the board meeting of December 19, 2007.

Strategic research, innovation and sustainable development committee

At its meeting held on September 14, 2006, the board of directors of our Company created a strategic research, innovation and sustainable development committee, along with a committee charter.each director.



120148



Back to Contents


The Nominations and Compensation Committee assists the Board in its periodic evaluation work. It prepares the Board’s annual evaluation of its organization and operations and conducts the formal evaluation of the Board that is carried out every three years by an outside organization. Each year, the Committee provides the Board of Directors with a report evaluating the performances of the Chairman and of the directors, as well as the actions of executive management, which the Board discusses. Lastly, each year, the principal corporate managers that are not directors have a meeting with each member of the Committee.

Activities in 2009

In 2009, the work of the Nominations and Compensation Committee was devoted to: the adoption by the Board of the AFEP-MEDEF code, as amended in 2008, and the implementation thereof; the reduction in the duration of the term of office of directors; the termination of the employment contract of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and, then, of the Chief Executive Officer; the separation of the positions of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the granting of termination compensation to the Chief Executive Officer; amendments to the rules and regulations of the complementary defined benefits pension plan (corporate managers that are members of the Executive Committee); the creation of the position of Vice-Chairman; the appointment of two new directors; the appointment of an additional member to the Accounts and Audit Committee and the replacement of that Committee’s C hairman; the preparation of proposals and recommendations to the Board concerning the compensation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Committee (setting the variable portion of compensation for 2008 and the fixed portion for 2009, criteria for calculating the variable portion for 2009) and the compensation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer after the separation of this position into two positions; the review of proposals concerning the compensation of members of the Executive Committee; giving an opinion on the policy with respect to granting stock options and setting up group-wide employee savings plans; the informal evaluation of the operation of the Board of Directors and its Committees; the evaluation of the independence of the directors; the distribution of directors’ fees and the revision of the rules for distributing the variable portion of directors’ fees; and the revision of the internal rules and regulations of the Board of Directors and of the Nominati ons and Compensation Committee.

Strategy, Research, Innovation and Sustainable Development Committee

At its meeting on September 14, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors created a Strategy, Research, Innovation and Sustainable Development Committee and adopted its internal rules and regulations.

This committeeCommittee has three to five members, who are appointed by the boardBoard of directors based onDirectors pursuant to recommendations made by the Nominations and Compensation Committee. The Chairman of the nominations and compensation committee.  The chairman of the committeeCommittee is appointed by the boardBoard of directors basedDirectors on the basis of a proposal frommade by the chairmanChairman of the board.Board.

The committee is composedAs of the date of this annual report on Form 20-F, this Committee had three members, who were appointed by the boardBoard of directorsDirectors on September 14, 2006, two of whom are independent (*): Messrs. Philippe Kourilsky (chairman)(Chairman), Paul-Louis Girardot (*) and Jean-Marc Espalioux (*).

Pursuant toIn accordance with the committee charter,Committee’s internal rules and regulations, this Committee meets at the committee meetsinitiative of its Chairman or at the request of its chairman or the chairmanChairman of the boardBoard of directors.Directors. It meetsis required to hold at least three timesmeetings per year. In 2007,During the committee2009 fiscal year, the Committee met a total of 10 times. Theseven times (compared with eight times in 2008). Its members’ average attendance rate was 100%85.7% (compared with an attendance rate of 91.7% in 2008).

Duties

The committee’s mission isduties of the Committee are to evaluate “researchassess the research and development”development and “sustainable development”sustainable development strategies and policies and strategies proposed by our Group’s relevantthe departments of the Company and Group responsible therefore and to adviseprovide its opinion thereon to the boardBoard of directors accordingly.Directors.

It is keptThe Committee must be informed of programs and high-prioritypriority actions that have been undertaken and it evaluates the results.results thereof. In particular, it receives information relating tokeeps abreast of budgets and manpower,staff levels and advises ongives its opinion regarding the allocation of means and resources and their adequacywhether they are appropriate in light of proposed objectives.strategic choices made.

The committee principally communicates withCommittee’s main contacts are the chairmanCompany’s Chairman of the boardBoard of directors, seniorDirectors, executive management and Executive Committee, the Company’s executive committee, the “researchGroup’s research and development”development and “sustainable development”sustainable development departments, of the Group as well as all executivesany other manager within the Company who has information or opinions that may provide useful input or opinions.be of use to the Committee.

The Committee may also consult with third partiesinterview persons outside of the Company whose participation may be useful inif it deems such interviews of use to the fulfillmentperformance of its duties. ItIn addition, the Committee may consult with outside experts as needed.experts.



149



Back to Contents


Activities during 2007in 2009

In 2007,2009, the committee’s activities were devotedCommittee oversaw the implementation of a new organization within the Group in the fields of research, innovation and competition monitoring, focusing, in particular, revolving around the structure dedicated to the organizationGroup research and development activities known as Veolia Environnement Research and Innovation (“VERI”). The Committee analyzed and made recommendations on the research and development budget and the preparation and implementation of numerous meetings with our Group’s management, including with our company’s chairmaninnovation strategies. The Committee interviewed the heads of the four Divisions and chief executive officer,their teams, as well as the managers of our Group’s divisions,VERI, the industrial markets and new business sectors manager and the director of the development and technology research department. Four working groups addressing research and development themes, technological and scientific oversight, innovation and the resources needed for R&D and innovation activities were created upon the request of the committee. In 2007, it continued its analysis and review of Veolia Environnement Group’s strategyIT systems manager. The Committee also monitored progress made with respect to innovationindustrialization and oversightthe sharing of knowledge and identified potential improvement lines. In 2007,expertise within the committee reliedGroup and made recommendations thereon. The Committee presented a report on outside consultantsits work to conduct additional studies.   the Board of Directors’s meeting of December 17, 2009.

Committees created by management

Disclosure committeeCommittee

Our Company’s chairmanThe Disclosure Committee was created by the Chairman of the management board (directoire) and chief financial officer created a disclosure committee (comité de communication), which was presented to our company’s former management boardthe Company’s Chief Finance Officer on December 11, 2002.2002, the date on which the proposal to create such Committee was submitted to the Company’s management board. The chief executive officer or, in his absence, the senior executive vice president presides over meetings of the disclosure committee.  Committee are chaired by the Chief Executive Officer.

In addition to the chief executive officer andChief Executive Officer, the senior executive vice president, the permanent members of the committee includeDisclosure Committee are the headsmembers of the Company’s Executive Committee, the Company’s Chief Finance Officer, the Secretary General, the finance managers of each of our company’s divisions (water, energy services, waste management and transportation)Division and the principal executive officersmanagers of our company’s corporatethe Company’s major centralized departments.

PursuantAccording to its charter,internal rules and regulations, the disclosure committee principally: (i) overseesprincipal duties of the Disclosure Committee are to oversee the implementation of internal procedures concerning the collectionfor collecting and control of information concerning our company that will be disclosed to the public; (ii) defines the process for preparing our company’s reports and other disclosure; (iii) examines theverifying information to be disclosedmade public by the Company, to define the procedures for preparing and approvesdrafting reports and communications, to review information communicated and to approve the final version of draft reports or other disclosure,and communications, in particular the U.S. Form 20-F, whichthat are to be filed with the French and American regulatory authorities; and (iv) approvesU.S. stock exchange authorities, as well as to review the procedures for publicationmanner in which they are published, filed or filing of these documents.registered.

The disclosure committee reports on its work to the chief executive officer and the senior executive vice president. ItDisclosure Committee meets as often as is necessary in order to assure the fulfillment ofperform its duties but no less thanand, in any event, at least twice a year, including (i) onceyear. It meets first before the end of each year to organize and launchinitiate the process of drafting of our company’s Frenchthe reference document and annual report on Form 20-F for the past fiscal year, and (ii)it meets again before the filing of the annual report on Form 20-F is filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in order to approve the content of this report. The disclosure committeeIf necessary, the Committee may also meet before the announcement of any significant events.

The Disclosure Committee met twice in 2009. At its meeting of April 9, it reviewedinter aliathe procedures followed in preparing and approving Form 20-F before it was filed with the SEC on April 16, 2009, as well as the certificates required to be provided by the -Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Finance Officer in accordance with U.S. regulations. At its meeting of December 17, 2009, the Disclosure Committee principally reviewed recent regulatory developments that could have an impact on the communication and publication of information intended for the market, in particular through the reference document and Form 20-F, and initiated the process of collecting information and preparing the annual reports for the 2009 fiscal year.

Ethics Committee

The Ethics Committee was created by Veolia Environnement’s Executive Committee in March 2004. It has three to five members who are chosen by the Company’s Executive Committee. The Committee elects a Chairman from among its members. The Chairman has no more powers than the other members, except the power to break a tie in the event of a tie vote.

As of the date of this annual report on Form 20-F, the Committee has three permanent members and one alternate. The Committee’s members are present at the Company on a daily basis.

Membership on the Committee is open to employees, former employees or persons outside the Company. Members are chosen from among applicants who are familiar with the Group’s businesses and who have a professional position that guarantees the independent judgment and perspective necessary for the position.

The Committee’s decisions are made by a majority vote. Its members are subject to a strict confidentiality obligation and are not authorized to disclose outside the Company the position they hold. To guarantee their ability to exercise their judgment objectively, they receive no instructions from the Company’s executive management and they cannot be dismissed during their term of office (which is four years and which can be renewed).



121150



Back to Contents


The disclosure committee met twice in 2007.  During its June 22, 2007 meeting, it reviewed and approved our company’s annual report on Form 20-F as well asCommittee may seek assistance from designated contact persons within each Division. This local presence has become particularly important since 2009 when the certifications required from its chief executive officer and senior executive vice president in accordanceCompany began appointing managers with U.S. regulatory provisions. At its December 3, 2007 meeting, the disclosure committee principally reviewed regulatory developments relating to reports and other communications designed for public disclosure and, particularly, the convergence of IAS and IFRS standards and U.S. GAAP. It also launched the process of collecting information and preparing for drafts of our company’s annual reports for the 2007 fiscal year. In addition, it reviewed the comments we had received from the SEC relating to our company’s 2006 Form 20-F, as well as those it received from the AMF in connection with its review of the 2006 reference document.

Ethics committee

In February 2003, we implemented an ethics program entitled “Ethics, Commitment and Responsibility,” which was updated in December 2004. This program is intended to guide the daily behavior of our employees with respect to ethical matters.  

In March 2004, we created an ethics committee to examine and settle any questions relating to the ethics program. The ethics committee consists of three to five members chosen by our company’s executive committee and may pursue any matter that it wishes regarding group ethics. Employees may also freely consult with the committee. The ethics committee must act independently with respect to matters it treats and hold the information relating thereto confidential.

The committee elects its own chairman, with no particular power being provided for in relation to other members, except that of a casting vote in the event of a tie in voting.  The committee currently has three members.  Members of the committee may include employees, former employees or persons outside of our company selected among candidates with a good knowledge of our Group’s businesses and a professional position guaranteeing the independence and perspective necessary for the position.  The committee’s decisions require a majority approval.  Its members are subject to strict confidentiality requirements and are not authorized to discuss their personal positions outside the committee.  The committee may rely on correspondents designated to it by each of our Group’s divisions.geographical responsibilities.

In accordance with its internal charter,rules and regulations, the ethics committee’s duty isduties of the Ethics Committee are to make all recommendations concerningregarding the fundamental values of Veolia Environnement relating either toconcerning subjects it decideshas chosen itself or in response to examine or following questions presented to it.

Accordingly, in 2009, the Ethics Committee continued the major review of labor standards within the Group that have been broughtit initiated in 2008, which led it inter alia to its attention.  carry out visits to countries where labor is less well protected than elsewhere.

In applicationorder to stay closely informed of this principal, the ethics committee may, in particular, perform “ethics audits” in any of our Group’s operations, whetherthe Committee seeks to increase its contacts with all groups of persons that may benefit from its services. These contacts range from attendance at certain seminars in France or abroad.outside France that gather certain targeted groups to individual interviews.

In 2009, the Committee also continued its practice of holding meetings with each member of the Company’s executive management, a practice it plans to continue each year.

The Ethics Committee may carry out “ethics audits” with regard to any of the Group’s operations, in France and outside France. The principal purpose of this proceduresuch audits is to assess, based onthrough individual interviews with selected individuals representinga sample that is as faithfullyrepresentative as possible of the operation in question,site visited, the level of employees’ ethical commitment,understanding of ethics issues, their knowledge of ourfamiliarity with the Group’s values, the ethical problems they may encounter, and the training they receive (fromfrom their supervisors)supervisors or give (toprovide to their colleagues)employees on the subject.

Pursuant toFurthermore, the “whistleblowing” provision of Article 301Ethics Committee is the body that receives and investigates alerts by Group employees regarding breaches of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act,code of conduct, in particular those in the ethics committee is in charge of receiving and handling, in coordination with the accounts and audit committee, all employee inquiries relating to accounting, auditing or internal control matters.  On June 14, 2005, the accounts and audit committee approved the set of procedures to be followed for handling and following up on these employee inquiries.

As such, the ethics committee handles notices sent to it by employees of our Group relating to breaches of our Group’s “Ethics, BeliefsCommitments and Responsibility” program. This is known as the whistleblowing procedure. The committeeCommittee has all necessary authority to perform its duties: itthese duties. It can consult withinterview all employees of the Group, the statutory auditors and any Group employee, statutory auditor or third party. It can also request the assistance of ourVeolia Environnement’s internal audit department or use the services of externaloutside experts. It has access to all of the sites and allor companies of ourthe Group.

In 2007,2009, as in previous years, the committeeCommittee received few major alerts concerning ethical issues. The Committee continues to note that there is a significant difference between Anglo-American countries, where this system operates without difficulty, and the rest of the world, where this procedure is not a part of the culture. Therefore, the Committee has initiated an internal communication program to make its role better known and to inform all Group employees of their right to bring a matter before the Committee if all natural problem resolution avenues have already been tried unsuccessfully.

As it does every year, in 2009, the Committee reported on its work to the accountsAccounts and audit committeeAudit Committee and to the executive committee concerning its operations and expressed the reasons forExecutive Committee, describing matters on which it was satisfied as well as its expectations.and areas in which future action was desirable.



122151



Back to Contents


EMPLOYEES

Employee Information

The corporate information below is taken from an international database, which we have been developing since 2001. This database includes, for all of the companies in our Group whose results are fully or proportionally consolidated for accounting purposes, approximately 150200 corporate indicators, that yield more than 225,000270,000 pieces of data per year, sorted by company, country and geographical area or region.

The salient indicators drawn from the international database are presented below under different subheadings. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such figures, in particular in the case of averages, since the figures below are often aggregated across all parts of the world, and may require more detailed analysis at the level of the specificrelevant geographic area, country or business concerned.business.

Total Number of Employees


As of December 31, 2007,2009, we had 319,502312,590 employees, an increasea decrease of 7.04% (21,0046.97% (24,423 employees) over 298,498336,013 employees as of December 31, 2006.2008.

The following table shows the distribution of Veolia Environnement’s employees by activity and geographic location as of December 31, 2007:2009:

Water*

Environmental Services*

Energy Services

Transportation

Total

%

Water*

Environmental
Services*

Energy
Services

Transportation

Total

%

Europe

55,945

68,288

43,794

61,166

229,889**

71.95%

59,538

54,165

40,026

55,807

210,589**

67.38%

of which metropolitan France


29,725


35,928


20,058


31,027


117,434**


36.76%

30,483

23,705

15,396

29,887

100,524**

32.16%

North America

3,626

11,243

109

13,890

28,868

9.04%

3,874

9,549

628

14,116

28,167

9.01%

South America

2,925

7,369

7,225

1,697

19,216

6.01%

4,801

7,352

6,962

1,030

20,145

6.44%

Africa/Middle East

7,726

7,355

1,266

498

16,845

5.27%

8,412

8,546

1,405

3,313

21,676

6.93%

Asia/Pacific

12,645

5,777

1,981

4,281

24,684

7.73%

19,164

5,988

3,536

3,325

32,013

10.24%

Total

82,867

100,032

54,375

81,532

319,502**

100%

95,789

85,600

52,557

77,591

312,590**

100%

%

25.94%

31.31%

17.02%

25.52%

100%

 

31%

27%

17%

25%

100%

 

*

Proactiva’s employees (8,789 employees) have been divided according to activity, between water (1,939 employees) and waste services (6,850 employees).

**

The total number for France includes 696 employees who work at our company's headquarters, at the Centre d’Analyses Environnementales and at the Veolia Environnement Campus.


*

Proactiva’s employees (10,656 employees) have been divided according to activity, between Water (3,633 employees) and Environmental Services (7,023 employees).

**

The total number for France includes 1,053 employees who work at our Company’s headquarters (VE SA, VERI and VEIT), at the Centre d’Analyses Environnementales and at the Veolia Environnement Campus.


*

Proactiva’s employees (10,656 employees) have been divided according to activity, between Water (3,633 employees) and Environmental Services (7,023 employees).

**

The total number for France includes 1,053 employees who work at our Company’s headquarters (VE SA, VERI and VEIT), at the Centre d’Analyses Environnementales and at the Veolia Environnement Campus.

As of

At December 31, 2007, 36.76%2009, 32.16% of our employees werethe Veolia Environnement total headcount was located in France, 35.19%35.22% in the rest of Europe, 9.04%10.24% in North Americathe Asia/Pacific region and 19.01%22.38% in the rest of the world.

Breakdown of employees by type of contract and by category


As ofAmong the 312,590 employees managed by the Company at December 31, 2007, we employed 319,502 persons, of whom 298,008 persons (representing 93.3% of our employees) worked under indefinite term employment2009, 292,223 (93%) held indefinite-term contracts and 21,494 persons under20,367 held fixed-term employment contracts. During 2007, 8,0302009, 5,961 fixed-term employment contracts were converted into indefinite term employmentindefinite-term contracts (or 37.4%(29.2%). As ofAmong the employees managed by Veolia Environnement at December 31, 2007, 27,048 of our employees (or8.5% of total employees)2009, 28,580 (9.1%) were managers 292,454(cadres), and 284,010 were non-managerial employees, and 65,519 werenon-managers. The headcount comprised 62,337 women, (or 20.5%representing 19.9% of the total employees).


number of employees.

In France, among the 117,716100,818 employees as ofmanaged at December 31, 2007 (including 282 employees in Réunion), 110,413 (or 93.8%2009, 95,794 (95%) were employed under indefinite term employmentheld indefinite-term contracts and 7,303 under5,024 held fixed-term employment contracts. During 2007, 3,0652009, 1,970 fixed-term contracts were converted into indefinite termindefinite-term contracts (or 42%(39.2%). Of ourAmong the employees in France, 13,393 (or 11.4%managed by Veolia Environnement, 13,141 (13%) were managers, 104,423and 87,677 were non-managerial employees and 25,770 (or 21.9%non-managers. The headcount comprised 19,690 women (19.5%) were women.




123



Back to Contents


.

Weighted average annual number of employees

This figureheadcount corresponds to the equivalent number of employees that weVeolia Environnement would have had if the latterthese employees had all been workingworked full time duringthroughout the entire year. It is calculated by weighting the total number of employeesheadcount against both the employment rate and the amount of time worked by each employee. In 2007, our weighted average number2009, this headcount was 296,120.6 employees, of employees was 291,140.2, of which 270,880.2 (or 93.0%whom 278,223.4 (94%) were employed under indefinite term employmentheld indefinite-term contracts.



152



Back to Contents


In France, the weighted average numberannual headcount in 2009 was 97,568.9 employees, of employees during 2007 was 110,520, of which 103,964 (or 94%whom 92,893.9 (95.2%) were employed under indefinite term employmentheld indefinite-term contracts.

Consolidated weighted average annual number of employees

This figure is calculated by weighting the average annual number of employees of consolidated companies against the level of consolidation of such companies. In 2007,2009, the consolidated weighted average number of employees was 284,072.  291,000.

Temporary employeesOptional and mandatory profit-sharing

In France, in 2009, the total amount paid in respect of optional profit-sharing was €68,810,823 (€62,361,750 in 2008) and the amount paid in respect of mandatory profit-sharing was €64,616,872 (€68,139,126 in 2008). The numbertotal amount of temporary employees in 2007 (in full time equivalents) was 14.026, which represents 4.8%optional and mandatory profit-sharing represented €133,427,695, or 4.4% of the total full-time equivalentscost of employees.employment (€130,500,877 in 2008).

Labor relations and overview of collective bargaining agreements

In 2009, 2,047 collective bargaining agreements were signed, including 1,023 agreements on compensation, 268 agreements on health, safety or working conditions, 317 agreements on labor-management dialog and 439 agreements on other subjects or that regrouped several subjects. The total number of employee representatives was 15,553. In France, the786 collective bargaining agreements were signed, including 431 agreements on compensation, 91 agreements on health, safety or working conditions, 88 agreements on labor-management dialog and 176 agreements on other subjects or that regrouped other subjects. The total number of temporary employeesemployee representatives in 2007 (in full time equivalents)France was 7,648, which represents 6.9% of the total full-time equivalents of employees.9,372.

Human Resources Policies

At the end of 2007, we2009, Veolia Environnement had 319,502312,590 employees, an increase7% less than in 2008. This is a result of 7% compared to 2006. This increase reflects the rapid international developmentdisposal of our Group,certain assets (in particular Veolia Propreté Nettoyage et Multiservices), the activitiesloss of which are territorially-based. As a leader in environmental services, we intend to maintain this growth ratecertain contracts and spread our corporate model in the 68 countries in which we operate.impact of the economic crisis on some industrial sector contracts.

The integrationnature of the Group’s activity fully justifies the attention paid to all its employees, who are located throughout the 74 countries where Veolia is present. Firstly, this service-based activity, which is provided to the public, local and regional government, requires a know-how that is extensively drawn from Veolia men and women. Secondly, their skills cannot be delocalized, as they need to be in proximity to the territories and populations they serve.

For these reasons, systematically taking into account local context, cultural specificities and the existing teams is at the heart of the Company’s preoccupations and strategy. The human resources policy is therefore based on the conviction that valorizing talents and skills is a prerequisite for motivating employees and improving performances, at all levels of the business, at all stages of corporate life and for each of its local contexts. In the current economic climate, the Group’s social model must, more than ever, reinforce its founding values of employability, skills development, occupational safety, social awareness and guaranteed decent living conditions.

Ensuring that new employees are integrated and retained is therefore a key strategic aspect of the cultivation of their loyalty to the company are essential elements of ourGroup’s human resources policy. In accordance withAs an extension of the principles that were adopted several years ago, weVeolia Environnement is continuing ourits efforts to provide specializedoffer all new employees sound training that is specific to each new employee in orderoccupation, which makes it possible for him or herthem to become professionals in his or her specific areastheir field of business and growto create opportunities for themselves to progress throughout his or hertheir career. This training is also intended to enhance each employee’sdevelop their sense of service and demonstrateto enhance the value of his or her contribution towardsthey make, at their level, to the provision of essential needs, the preservation of the environment and the well-being of the public.

One of the means of fosteringdeveloping this sense of service is through the combination of training courses and work experience.work-study programs. This type of training is gradually becominghas become a standard method of recruitment in the standard recruitment method in our Group’s various Group entities. In France, the “Veolia Skills” program, which started in 2005, illustrates our company’s concretethe Group’s commitment to put this approach into practice through its professional skills trainingapprenticeship or work-and-training contracts.

WithDeveloping career paths and mobility, encouraging labor-management dialog at all levels and using social engineering know-how are all positive measures that convey the support ofGroup’s values in all the Veolia Environnement Campus and its international network, this ambitious commitment to skills is at the center of our training policy. Throughcountries where it employees develop a sense of solidarity and a sense that they are contributing to the exchange of know-how. To further this method of recruitment, new campuses are currently being opened both locally and abroad. This new stage in training development will enable us to continue to spread our corporate model while adapting it to the regulatory context of each country.

In addition to our commitment to employment, our employment policy is structured around a number of themes that are aimed at combining personal growth with economic performance.

does business. Safety remains a major concern and ourthe Group is tirelessly pursuing its efforts in this area, while also helping its employees to protect the health of our employees. In addition, reinforcingstay in good health. Moreover, increasing diversity and promoting equal opportunities are importantkey issues for maintaining growth and fostering our values of coherenceupholding Veolia Environnement’s commitment to cohesion and solidarity.

The development of career paths and professional mobility, the maintenance of dialogue at every level and the expertise in human resources are assets that add value to our Group in all of the countries in which we operate.

teamwork. Finally, employee satisfactionwell-being is addressed through suitable living conditions and an equitable compensation policy whichthat rewards employees’ individual efforts and allows employees to benefit fromtakes into account the company’sCompany’s performance.



124153



Back to Contents


Understanding our corporate reality

The consistent management of human resources within each division of our group requires a constant appraisalOnly sound knowledge of corporate reality and operational practices. We have beenpractices makes it possible to deploy and manage human resources consistently. The Group uses a worldwide network of more than 700 correspondents who collect, process and consolidate around 200 social indicators. A dedicated software package is used to ensure that this process is reliable and to validate the data, which is then analyzed by geographical zone, by country and by type of activity.

The objective, accurate evaluation of the human resources performance of each entity over time is guaranteed by the stability of the chosen indicators. In this regard, once again this year Veolia Environnement is ranked as one of the leaders among companies included in theleading CAC 40 indexcompany in terms of the thoroughness and quality of the corporate information we publish. We depend on a worldwide network of more than 600 correspondents in the divisionsits human resources data1.

Specific attention is paid to collect, process and consolidate 160 employment-related indicators.

Specialized software is used to ensure that collection and confirmation of the data is reliable.  Data collection is followed by analysis by geographic location, country and type of activity.

The stability of certain indicators facilitates a better use and guarantees and encourages an objective and precise evaluation of corporate progress within each of our entities. Our Group monitors various indicators with particularly close attention.  These progress indicators provide a global perspective on certain areas of employment policy set forth by our management, which expects the various entities to focus on:five parameters:

Employeeemployee loyalty;

Reduction ofreducing absenteeism;

Safesafety of working conditions;

Reduction ofreducing temporary employment;labor (fixed-term contracts and temporary workers);

Developmentthe development of professionalvocational training and skills particularly through on-the-job training.of skills.


These are the key tenets of the human resources policy that is driven by Veolia Environnement general management, to which it has asked Veolia entities to devote their efforts in terms of steering.

InAnalysis and internal surveys are also conducted in order to improve the steering of the human resources managementpolicy in the coming years analysis and internal examinations are underway to:to come:

Analyzeidentify recurring trends through analyzing changes in the evolution of indicators over the last three years and thus observe recurring themes,years;

Comparecompare data from Veolia Environnement and its subsidiaries with publicly available information relating topublic statistics from the corresponding business sectors (beginning(initially in France),;

Observe revenuesanalyze the results by areaprofession and country,by country;

Collect and highlight particularities withinthe specificities of each divisionactivity or withinthe specific contexts of certain countries, andcountries;

Identify those areas wheredefine paths for progress is needed in the coming years, definingby adapting, where applicable, the objectives by profession and by country.


These projects will be pursued with the long-term objective of refining theThis method of evaluatingevaluation and managing corporate performance within Veolia Environnement and each of its subsidiaries.

This evaluation method must besteering is based on a common indicators and progressframework of performance objectives, which are then individualized, on a case by case basis,is personalized in order to take into accountlight of the particularities bothspecificities of each job categorylocal occupations and the local parameters of each country (such ascontexts (e.g. practices, legislation, regulations and job protection) on the other hand.

We are aware of the need to anticipate the progresssocial protection, etc.). The analyses and long-term prospects of skills and professions, and are thus continuing to enhance our system of classification and management of human resources through a detailed mapping of jobs and skill-sets across our various divisions, and through a unified classification of our managers.  In France and abroad, our Group focuses on to the corporate environment in which we are evolving and attempts to anticipate our transformations.  To this end, the corporate observatory, formed in 2001, conducts prospective analysis and studies in partnership with research organizationssurveys will be continued in order to formulate a long-term human resources vision.  We must take into account demographic pressure, transformations inrefine the labor market, reorientation of public policy in terms of recruitment and training, and changes in behavior regarding mobility and career choices in order to anticipate changes in our model that are appropriate for a global corporate environment.



125



Back to Contentsmethod over time.


In 2007, the corporate observatory’s work focused on:1

The CEREQ study (Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches sur les Qualifications)Alpha Study issued on November 26, 2009 on the skill management agreement, the final report of which was presented to all parties involved, including the French committee of our Group, and

A study on absenteeism conducted in collaboration with the ANACT (National Agency for the Improvement of Work Conditions - Agence Nationale pour l’Amélioration des Conditions de Travail).

In 2007, a broad program entitled “Respecting differences and equal opportunities” was launched in order to identify the difficulties encountered in managing diversity and to seek best practices in this area.


Encouraging employee loyalty through the development of skills and professional progress

Professional training is the preferred method of skills development for all of our employees because it:

Allows them to acquire the required knowledge tailored to changes in their profession and our clients’ expectations;

Ensures their ability to progress and find employment throughout their professional life;

Encourages mobility;

Offers training courses leading to degrees or official qualifications.

In 2007, our entities in France continued the local implementation of an agreement relating to the development of skills and professional training, which we signed with unions on October 4, 2004.  This implementation involves using various customized plans that take into account the priorities and specific features of each division.

“Veolia Skills” Program

Veolia Skills is a recruitment program launched in France in 2005 with the goal of anticipating business growth and the progress of obtaining employee qualifications. This campaign, which in 2007 involved 6,559 employees, is open to internal and outside candidates, of all ages and qualifications.   

Outside candidates are offered professional skills training contracts with terms of nine to 24 months. If the training is successful, the candidates obtain a diploma (from the CAP to a Master’s), and are offered an indefinite-term employment contract.  In addition to traditional recruitment channels, this year four buses with the Veolia logo were sent out across France to present our Group’s businesses and to seek candidates within local populations.  The program also benefited the internal candidates to whom skill development contracts or training periods were offered in order to increase their skills within our Group. This mobility is an example of the progress made under our framework agreement concerning skills development.  Moreover, in addition to the raising our profile through the recruitment campaign and encouraging employees’ educational mobility, this program of fers certain employees the opportunity to expand their roles by becoming instructors.

Given the success of the campaign, we are continuing Veolia Skills in 2008.

A strong ambition: training and work experience

In order to maintain our position as leader in environmental services and continually reinforce the quality of our services, we depend on one key asset: qualified personnel.  in order to develop employee skills within the constantly evolving context of our various divisions, our Group relies on Veolia Environnement Campus to coordinate our training policy, which is based on the following principles:

Provide experience to our Group’s employees in their division and professional context while promoting their acquired expertise to clients,

Organize the transfer of know-how within subsidiaries,

Support the policies of professional mobility and career development, and

Reinforce the corporate culture surrounding the environmental services division by emphasizing potential synergies (high added value for the Company’s clients) and solidarity.2008 reports.



126154



Back to Contents


Encouraging employee loyalty through the development of skills and professional progress

Veolia Environnement Campus: a pivotal training sitestrives to attract and train the best employees in all the socio-professional categories of its professions and in all countries where the Group is present.

As a common platform for skills development for all Veolia Environnement divisions (water, energy services, environmental servicesreaffirms its societal commitment to facilitate access to jobs for young people and transportation),the unemployed, by emphasizing its investment in the work-study system, which prepares its employees for employability by combining theoretical training and practical experience. For Veolia Environnement, Campus brings togetherwork-study programs are not only a training policy, but also a recruitment policy, since they facilitate access to employment and the training directorshiring process stages for the Company.

Veolia Environnement’s exemplary action in the field of allwork-study programs has been recognized through the “Work-Study Mission” entrusted to Henri Proglio by the French President, in the context of our Group’s subsidiariesthe current economic climate and constitutesthe state of employment among young people. This action has led to both major corporations being mobilized around the promotion and development of work-study contracts, as well as to the publication of a forumreport delivered to the government in December 2009, which proposes a set of measures to encourage companies to use work-study programs.

In the same way, at the request of the Secretary of State for cultural diversity and interaction.

As a technological showcase for our activities,Employment, the Veolia Environnement Campus isdirector of training authored a study on mentoring.

Regardless of their origin and length of service, this also a pivotal training facility which is atmeans giving each employee the forefrontpossibility of a worldwide network.

Taking into account our current development and prospectsdeveloping their skills throughout his or her career. Annual assessment interviews define the requirements that are availablenecessary for each employee to our business arounddevelop skills and improve career development prospects. These are complemented by executive reviews and the world, commercial, human, and financial considerations requiredesign of succession plans for the efficient management of training efforts and an optimization of our Group’s resources.  To this end, the purposes, implementation principles, and development areas within our Group’s training policy must be upheldkey positions in each country and division, while taking local contexts into account.

Valuable initial and continued training

The Veolia Environnement Campus, which provides training for all of the skills required for the provision of environmental services, develops its programs in a manner that is responsive to the needs of continuing education, which is an essential skill development tool for employees and which also enables them to ensure their future employability.  Nearly 20,000 participants were admitted to the campus in 2007.

The campus’s program also responds to initial training needs.  This part of the program allows for the involvement of young people who earn a professional degree through apprenticeship and work study (from the CAP to Master’s degree).  This is the case at the CFA (Centre de Formation des Apprentis) Institute of Urban Environment, where nearly 16 degrees were earned with a success rate of 92%.  These high-level degrees correspond to the Europeanlicence, Master’s and doctorate.

An international network and reliable partnersentity.

In order to improvestrengthen management culture, particular attention is paid to the implementationmanagement of its ambitioussenior managers, in particular their leadership potential and their ability to propagate Veolia Environnement’s social responsibility values. It is therefore essential for the Group to identify talented managers and to anticipate natural turnover, by strengthening the talent pipelines in a constant, balanced way so as to reflect the Group’s international deployment and diversity.

Continuance of the “Veolia Skills” approach

Veolia Skills is a recruitment approach that was launched in France in 2005 in order to anticipate business growth and changing qualifications. The program is open to internal and external candidates, of all ages and qualifications.

External candidates benefit from apprenticeship or training policy,contracts in order to receive work-study training over nine to twenty-four months. If the training is completed successfully, the candidates are awarded a diploma (ranging from a CAP (vocational skills certificate) to a Master’s degree), which increases the chances of being offered an indefinite-term employment contract.

The approach is also open to internal candidates, who are offered Skills Development Contracts or work-study periods in order to progress within the Group. These types of mobility show how the framework agreement is being implemented to develop skills.

As part of the Veolia Skills operation, the regional branches of Veolia Environnement Campus is at the center of an international network of 18 campuses in 11 countries, as well as an increasing number of academic partnerships between the Group’s subsidiariesdecided to organize “Meetings with Employment and local universities.

In 2007, three new CFAs were opened in France and are the first of the new regional campuses to become operational. The Chicago Campus openedTraining Partners” in the United States. Infall of 2008. The aim of these meetings was to encourage discussions and to clarify the Czech Republic,expectations of all the stakeholders concerned locally by the environmental services institutesector. More than 750 participants responded favorably to this call. These meetings have given rise to the publication of Prague broadened its activitiesa progress report entitled “The New Challenges for Environment Sector Professions”. From April to all fields.  

EnsuringJune 2009, Veolia Environnement went out to meet candidates who were pre-selected by employment and training partners (State Job Centers, local initiatives, the safetyAFPA, GRETA and health ofCFA training organizations, Disability Advisory Bureaus, etc.). Candidates were able to have meetings with Group employees

Our employees often who work in public areas and private sites under conditions that involve risks to their safety. wh ere there is a strong need for recruitment.

In addition, their work sometimes involves a certain level of physical stress that may result in health problems.

Confronted with these risks, each division has prepared various voluntary risk prevention policies, while involving, as part of its operational management, the monitoring of indicators relatingcontributing to the frequency and seriousness of accidents.“Work-Study Mission”, Veolia continued to act as a socially responsible employer, by committing to hire 3,000 young people in 2009/2010 through various work-study contracts: apprenticeship contracts, work-and-training contracts or research agreements.

In addition to continuous improvements in safety material and individual protective gear, several priority safety measures have been systematically implemented within all of our Group’s companies, aimed at:

identifying and evaluating risks in order to prevent them;

training and informing employees on how to recognize and prevent workplace accidents and control risks; one quarter of each employee’s training is dedicated to safety and health matters;

strengthening the network of safety providers and developing a dialogue with employees dedicated to the study of health and safety issues in the context of 2,971 cases dedicated to these subjects;

supporting injured persons, both during their convalescence and once they resume their work;

implementing, on a case by case basis, a management system for health and safety at work, based on the international reference OHSAS 18001;

ensuring the safety of employees traveling for business in high-risk areas through the safety crisis team, which is overseen by safety managers.



127155



Back to Contents


OurCareer paths diversified by mobility

In order to enrich its employees’ professional paths throughout their careers, for a number of years Veolia Environnement has invested in internal mobility for its staff categories. In 2009, over fifteen thousand employees benefited from mobility.

The Veolia Environnement recruitment and mobility website has been overhauled and extended. This new space, which is available online, is aimed as much at external candidates for positions or internships, as at Group employees who wish to change business sector or function. This portal is currently being deployed internationally: in the United States, the United Kingdom and Germany.

International development is not possible without executive mobility. Executives are corporate experts or managers who contribute to the start-up and development of new operations throughout the world, while facilitating the pooling and transfer of know-how. The objective is to encourage all talented employees and to accompany them wherever they work. Expatriates therefore come from an increasing variety of countries and represent forty-six nationalities.

In the past ten years, this population has almost doubled and at the end of 2009, 893 employees (of which 74% are French) were on assignment in more than seventy countries. Employee mobility involves for the most part the Group’s executive committee declared 2008development zones: Asia, Africa and the Middle East, in particular China, Saudi Arabia and the UAE.

Efforts are also continuing to promote VIE (International Corporate Volunteer) contracts. These young graduates (164 in 2009, of which one-third are women) represent a potential reservoir of talent for international mobility and for the Company.

Training and work experience

In order to maintain its position as a world leader in its sector (environmental services) and reinforce the quality and technical excellence of its services, Veolia Environnement relies on its prime resource: skilled employees. To develop employee skills in the constantly changing environment of its business sectors, the Group has entrusted Campus Veolia Environnement with the organization of an ambitious training policy that is based on the following guiding principles:

ensure that Group employees are as professional as possible in their profession and working environment, by emphasizing the experience they have acquired to clients;

organize the transfer of know-how within companies;

support the policies of professional mobility and career development;

strengthen the corporate culture that surrounds the environmental services profession by promoting potential synergies (high value-added for Group clients) and team work.

Campus Veolia Environnement: a benchmark for training

Campus Veolia Environnement is the expression of Veolia’s desire to be “World Safety Yeara reference in the field of vocational training. The Campus is responsible for implementing and organizing the training policy, and re-groups in a single location the various Group training divisions and trains employees and apprentices in skills that are specific to its four business segments. Campus Veolia Environnement”Environnement can simultaneously host hundreds of apprentices, and award seventeen diplomas, from the CAP (vocational skills certificate) to a Master’s degree, via its Apprentice Training Center (CFA). The Campus is a genuine benchmark in the field of ongoing, vocational training and its platforms and simulators reproduce employee tools, processes and working conditions.

In response to worldwide growth that involves human, commercial and financial issues, making sure that the know-how of the Group’s employees is aligned with changes in its business segments and the diversity of local contexts has become a necessity. This initiative is focusedwhy the training offered by Campus Veolia Environnement is being constantly adapted.



156



Back to Contents


Tasks and governing principles

Training is open to all employees, throughout their careers. Campus Veolia Environnement offers initial training through work-study programs, as well as ongoing training. The Campus makes it possible to obtain a recognized diploma or qualification. Its training courses are taught using real-life situations to encourage understanding of the profession, the demand for quality service and employee autonomy.

With around 450 Group professionals, internal skills are mobilized, which encourages teaching through a combination of work and study. The concept of joint investment by the employee and the company is particularly emphasized.

An international network built on a tested model

Campus Veolia Environnement coordinates the international training network, which is structured over the five continents. This network already federates eighteen campuses in eleven countries. This network makes it possible to implement and adapt training programs and take appropriate action that is aligned with the specificities of the region, countries and divisions concerned. To ensure the consistency and homogeneity of this deployment, local trainers benefit from the guidance of Campus Veolia Environnement quality training standards. Moreover, efficient relations are maintained with universities, top graduate schools and research centers.

As a complement to the original Jouy-le-Moutier site and as part of a logical move to bring employees closer together while maintaining a strong regional presence, five regional Campuses (North West in Lille, Central Eastern in Lyon, South East Marseille, West in Nantes and South West in Tarbes) have been open since 2008.

In the same way, the network of Campuses benefits from international branches: eleven Campuses support Veolia Environnement international development by proposing adapted programs in Germany, Australia, China, Egypt, the United States, Gabon, Israel, Morocco, the Czech Republic, the United Kingdom and Sweden.

Ensuring the safety and health of employees

Prevention, and the health and safety of our employees, are a continual concern given the very nature of our activities:

working on public roads;

being faced with antisocial behavior in vehicles;

working conditions on certain sites or the facilities of some corporate clients;

tasks that require a certain amount of physical labor.

Each Veolia Environnement Division and each subsidiary monitor accidentology indicators, in particular the frequency and severity of accidents in the operational management of their business activities.

In addition to constant work to improve safety materials and individual equipment, several priority safety measures have been implemented:

29% of each employee’s training is devoted to health and safety, in order to prevent occupational accidents;

preventing risks well upstream involves identifying and evaluating these risks; for example, particular attention is paid to the risks linked to the use of chemicals, for example, within the context of the European REACH Regulation;

as part of labor-management dialog, the 3,360 structures that are dedicated to health and safety contribute to raising awareness of these matters;

supporting employees who have suffered occupational accidents, both during their absence and when they return to work.

Using indicators, the Veolia Environnement Executive Committee regularly analyzes the prevention of professional,occupational risks, health and safety risks.as the logical extension of an approach to continually improve operational and management practices.



157



Back to Contents


The progress plan implemented in the Group since 2008 has made it possible to support various priority actions in the field throughout the world by focusing on:

annual Prevention, Health and Safety road maps for managers (quantitative data, current situation review, performance targets and plans for future actions);

Group management standards for Prevention, Health and Safety, which define the indispensable basis of Group requirements for occupational health and safety, and allow the operational entities to perform self-evaluations and be audited;

monitoring accidents via an information system that is being deployed to record and consolidate information on accidents (Acciline software) in order to obtain improved analysis of the causes and better evaluate the risks;

the development of employee skills on safety issues (workplace tutoring and safety orientation, use of a common core health and safety syllabus for training programs, and management of prevention, health and safety matters).

The involvement of the executive management and all the Group Committee unions in France has made it possible, through the Monitoring Commission for the framework agreement signed in December 2008 on prevention, health and safety, to make an initial assessment of the priority areas for progress that result from this agreement, in particular:

liaison and collective prevention initiatives in the area of occupational health and safety by associating the structures that are concerned with these matters by law, such as the Committee on Health, Safety and Working Conditions;

identification of occupational risks, more accurate measurement of these risks and, consequently, better management of them in order to reinforce their prevention;

the inclusion of occupational health and safety in the career path of all employees, in particular through training programs and professional meetings;

the development of access to healthcare and increasing responsibility among all staff with regard to their health and their safety;

the promotion of career paths that prevent future unemployability, in order to make health part of skills management;

seek improved health-safety balance between professional and private lives.

Veolia Environnement has improved the coordination and organization of the networks that are designed to prevent health and safety risks at international level. This method of organization ensures not only better deployment of the actions undertaken, but also makes it possible to define the Group policies on the basis of the risks identified in each operational unit. It has been implemented internationallyalso makes it possible to highlight the best practices of all Veolia sectors throughout the world and is designed to capitalize on existing practices. Five main actions, supported by a communication plan, will be implemented in early 2008:them.

Define and launch our Group’s essential Health & Safety standards;     

Implement the commitmentsPreparation of the executive committee regardingGroup to deal with the problems of Health & Safety;influenza pandemic risk

Set up an objective and performance review systemAs early as 2005 the Group took action to prepare for the management team;risk of an influenza pandemic, in order to set up the organization and the resources to fulfill two major objectives: ensure the protection of its employees and ensure the continuity of its business activities, which are vital to the existence of local and regional government.

Make Health & Safety an essential element of employee training and support;

Manage and controlFollowing the implementation ofWHO alerts concerning the Health & Safety policiesA/H1N1 influenza virus pandemic, the Group activated the chosen procedures, taking into account the progress of any policies already being used within different entities.

We strive to protect the health of its employees, their families and that of peoplerise in the countries where our Group does business. We implement our health policies through local actions.

Our Group conducts awarenessnumber of cases in each country (Mexico and prevention campaigns. In 2006, we conducted an international campaign called “Hygiene for my health”, aimed at informing our employees of the importance of hand-washing,United States were the first step in preventing an epidemic. The campaign informed employees ofcountries affected) and maintaining close liaison with the importance of hygiene with regards to theirlocal health through dialogues and exchanges. The 2007 report on this campaign shows that 100,000 employees worldwide were affected.

Moreover, our Group has created health crisis management plans, for potential events like a flu pandemic. To prepare for such a risk, our operations strengthened specific provisions that would allow activities that are essential for the population at large to continue without exposing their employees to risks.

Similarly, the Handicap Project was stepped up in 2006. This project aims at assisting recruiters and worksauthorities in order to elaborate common toolsensure the continuity of services, eliminate contamination and limit the potential impacts on employee health.



158



Back to Contents


A policy of increased security throughout the world

International current affairs continually confirm the unstable, shifting nature of the environment in which Group employees are sometimes required to work in certain countries, where they may be confronted with political crises, terrorist risks and natural disasters.

In 2009 the security department monitored 1,700 missions, an increase of 25% compared to 2008. The security department has a database, analyzes the local security conditions for our four divisionsmissions, anticipates risks by forming lateral working groupsproducing a monthly map of at-risk countries, and organizes training to remind employees how to behave during missions in orderat-risk countries (35% employees on short-term missions have been trained to help integrate handicapped persons withindate).

Risk prevention is paramount, both from a legal and human standpoint. The security department has set up responsive, coordinated internal networks at the workforce.Division’s head offices as well as in the field (fourteen “security officers” have been appointed throughout the world). In the event of an emergency, partnerships have been formed with global specialists for health and security evacuations.

Build and maintain a relationship of confidence with employees

A dialogue withLabor-management dialog that starts when employees initiated upon arrival and integration of personneljoin

In France and abroad, we pursue our externalthroughout the world, Veolia Environnement is continuing its acquisition-based growththrough several types of transactions,transaction, including mergers and acquisitions, the creation of localjoint subsidiaries with other industrial partners, and public service delegationPPP contracts signed with local governments.

and regional government authorities. In all cases, ourthe employees, play awho are the players in service professions, are one of the key role in our success.success factors.

A majorThe challenge is to allow employeestransfer and integrate the existing personnel into an approach that aims to achieve progress at every stage.level of the business and at all stages of employment. This applies to status,concerns the employee position characteristics, as well as training, benefiting fromthe capitalization of know-how, transmissionthe transfer of skills, as much as compensation and social benefits, and involves definingemployee benefits. This amounts to building a new corporate missionproject based on ourVeolia Environnement’s values, while continuing to respecttaking into account the one that is in place.  Ourexisting project.

Veolia Environnement’s human resources policy infor these casestypes of business combination is based on the conviction that the identification and validationvalorization of talents and skills is required in order to motivatea pre-requisite for motivating managers and improve theirimproving performance.

The systematic evaluation ofSystematically taking into account the local environment, mentalitycontext, mentalities and teams in place is at the centerheart of our company’s concernsthe Company’s strategy. The Company’s social engineering expertise and strategy; our Group’s expertise in employee benefits andthe management of human resources managementin this area, are the most important elementssuccess factors for the success of all these growth and integration transactions.operations.

Group committees to structure and strengthen labor-management dialog

For the Group’s local services, which are fundamental to Veolia Environnement’s business, labor-management dialog is initiated in business units that are as close to the employees and the working environment as possible. It is within this framework that labor and management representatives are best able to provide appropriate solutions in the areas of organization and working conditions, skills development and rewarding each employee’s individual efforts.

The Veolia Environnement labor-management dialog venue has three levels:

the first level, that of the business, remains the natural negotiating venue;

the second level, that of the country, regroups joint commissions for information and dialog that cover all the national themes;

the third level, on a European scale, informs and consults employees throughout Europe.

Two Group Committees were set up: one in France in 2003, then one at European level in 2005. These Committees met regularly in 2009, with each holding a plenary session and meetings at the level of their respective offices.

Within the scope of this active dialog, commissions have been monitoring the “Prevention of Occupational Risks, Health and Safety at Work” agreement, which was signed by all the French labor union organizations in December 2008.



128159



Back to Contents


Strengthening dialogueA new agreement was signed by the general management and all the labor union organizations (CGT, CFDT, CGT-FO, CFE-CGC, CFTC; UNSA) on February 9, 2010. This Group-level agreement covers the quality and development of labor-management dialog in France, in particular with employees at all levelsregard to:

For our Group’s local services, which are fundamental to our business, employee dialogue takes places within operating units at

recognition of the importance of labor-management dialog as a local level. It is at this level that social partners are best able to provide appropriate solutions concerning organization, working conditions, skill developmentpriority means of ensuring the Group runs smoothly and rewarding individual efforts.  This dialogue must be adaptedenjoys economic development;

the implementation of Group union coordinators with regard to the other countries where ournew provisions of labor law;

the adaptation of the resources allocated to Group has a presence. Afterunion coordinators and their organizations within the establishmentscope of the new provisions of the law on union representativeness;

the definition of the process that ensures elected employees’ careers and remuneration are actively managed and evolve, in particular via the recognition of union careers through the Validation of Professional Experience (VAE);

the rules governing access to and use by union organizations of new information and communication technologies.

The projected management of jobs and skills was also the subject of in-depth discussions with labor and management representatives concerning:

the implementation of a global process that aims to steer employment at Group Committee in France, a European Group Committee including employee representatives from 21 European countries was formed.  The resulting forum for employee dialogue operates on three levels:level, while strengthening labor-management Dialog;

The subsidiary level will remain the level on which where traditional negotiations occur,

The country level will allow for exchange of information and dialogue on all national themes,

The third level will beprocesses that aim to facilitate the European Group Committee, which shall be a forum for consultation and information on subjects involving all of our employees.

Improve social innovation

We seek to enhance our employee initiatives, whether they be individual or collective, local or global. Since 2003, our company has pursued this objective by creating procedures for the collection and publication of information concerning all employee and community-related matters. Close to 1,200 initiatives were recorded in five years originating in all regions of the world where we conduct business, demonstrating our Group’s consistency and individual contributions.

These initiatives concern the essential objectives of human resources development: employment, professional progress, training, health and security, and the improvement of local populations’ living conditions. Their value depends upon their effective implementation based on local concerns, and are always guided by the objective of improving the progressmobility of employees and skills development;

the well-beingimplementation of residentsjoint business segment observatories at the level of each of the areas where ourbusiness segments, complemented by a coordination committee at the Group conducts business.  Approximately 40 innovations become corporate initiatives, publishedlevel.

Lastly, as an extension of Veolia Environnement labor-management dialog, during the France and Europe Group committee meetings in French and English and featuredthe second half of 2009, there was in-depth communication by executive management on the Internetissues associated with the Transdev Group combination.

Promote diversity and intranet sites.fight against discriminations

In addition,From the outset, the Company adopted diversity as a panel meets annually to determine the most innovative projects and award them a trophy, delivered by our CEO.  In 2007, during an international human resources seminar in Brussels, six corporate initiative trophies were awarded to:core value:

Veolia Energy for “Pépinière Internationale, objectif 2010”;cultural diversity, which is linked to the many different origins of its employees, with over a hundred nationalities represented;

ST2Neconomic diversity, which is associated with having several business segments;

social diversity, which is a result of being located in many different countries.

These three dimensions are a source of riches that requires careful attention, as well as coordinated reflection on the guiding principles of the Veolia TransportEnvironnement diversity policy.

In 2007, an extensive program of internal work was undertaken with two aims:

produce a diagnostic review of behavior and practices in the Group and its subsidiaries;

generate a base of common values that preserve the Group’s identity and respect the diversity of its environments.



160



Back to Contents


This approach was put into practice through the launch of a “2008-2011 Diversity and Equal Opportunities Plan” that emphasizes three essential levers:

equal treatment, to guarantee non-discriminatory access to jobs, career progress and skills development;

harmonious management of diversity on a day-to-day basis, which means respecting differences, fighting against prejudices, and raising the awareness of Group internal stakeholders through training programs;

minimum labor standards, which guarantee growth that is socially responsible. These Group minimum labor standards, which go beyond the fundamental rights defined by the ILO and the OECD, need to be detailed and adapted throughout the world, in order to guarantee genuinely equal opportunities for all.

In order to promote non-discriminatory access to employment, Veolia Environnement is continuing its policy of recruitment through work-study programs. This policy aims to improve labor market access and employability for persons for whom access to jobs is difficult: young people without qualifications and the unemployed. The policy is therefore oriented towards sectors of the public that are deemed to be a priority: women (access to “male” professions and key positions), seniors (job maintenance), and employees of various ethnic origins. Access to operational management positions for women and increasing the international nature of senior executives are some of the ways forward that have been identified. With regard to careers for union representatives, the Group must be able to offer guarantees so that each elected representative can return to his/her profession and acqui re new skills at the end of his/her term of office.

Veolia Environnement also ensures that it helps seniors to stay in their jobs and encourages the recruitment of persons who suffer from handicaps or disabilities. The Divisions have Disability Assistance Offices that lead initiatives in terms of raising awareness, assistance with hiring disabled employees or the use of sheltered workshops.

In France, an Active Solidarity Plan was launched in consultation with the France Group committee, in order to support the more disadvantaged employees in a difficult economic context.

Within this framework, a center for “Mobi’guide”,advising and supporting employees outside the Company was set up: “Allô Solidarité”. Its objective is to resolve urgent situations and to provide security for individuals who very often do not know who to contact.

In an initial pilot phase, the operation concerns the Ile-de-France Region, where 30,000 employees are based. In order to ensure all employees were informed of this initiative as soon as the system was set up, a card with a toll free number and some explanations was attached to their pay slip.

In nine months, around 500 calls were received, primarily concerning housing and/or financial problems.

Lastly, in order to increase the visibility of its pro-diversity undertakings and actions, Veolia Environnement has applied for the improvement of service relations with disabled persons;diversity accreditation created by the French government and awarded by Afnor Certification in order to recognize corporate best practices.

A consistent, competitive compensation policy

Veolia Transport North America for “World Class Safety”, the leader in safety measures;

SENSE (France) for its training program for disabled persons within the cleaning profession;

Veolia Eau, Veolia Propreté and Veolia Transport in France for the tutorial school for young professionals coming from underprivileged neighborhoods; and

Tianjin CGE Water Co. Ltd, Veolia Water – China for the charitable plan aimed at destitute Chinese populations.

A compensation policy that associates employee benefits and employee profit-sharing

We applyEnvironnement applies a global compensation policy, which is consistent with our company’sthe Company’s results and includes the following components: salary, employee benefitssalaries, social security and employee savings. This approach consists of:

offering competitive compensationpolicy is based on the markets of the relevant countries;following principles:

enabling employees to earn fairguarantee competitive compensation that is in line with local market practices;

offer equitable compensation, which takes into account theirand rewards individual efforts;

strengthening employee benefits (such as illness,increase social security (health, disability and accidental death benefits)life insurance);

reinforcingminimize the pension and entitlementrisk associated with the existing systems for paying entitlements or pensions in the various countries; andcountries where we do business;

developingopen access to employee savings.



129161



Back to Contents


The increase in life-expectancylife expectancy, the rise in healthcare costs and medical costs, as well as the retirement of the “baby boom” generation will affecthave a lasting effect on the public welfare systems in the long-term.balance of social security systems. In certain countries, employers mustfollowing the abandonment of public social security systems, economic stakeholders have a duty to provide medical, life insurance,health, benefit and retirement coverage topension cover for their employees ifemployees.

As a result of its international dimension, the public welfare system does not.

In light of our international presence, our companyCompany must take these factors into account and be sure to:ensure that it:

respectcomplies with local legal systemslegislation and establishimplements complementary social welfaresecurity systems in order to guarantee high quality coverage tofor all of Ourits employees;

guaranteeguarantees the competitiveness of our companythe Company by attempting to limit corporate commitments subject tolimiting benefit obligations that fall within the scope of IAS 19 accounting standard;19;

finance savings plans with contributions from thefinances benefit systems by employer and employees in order to ensure the responsibility of all parties.employee contributions, so that each party assumes responsibility.

As ofAt December 31, 2007, our corporate commitments amounted to €1.92009, Veolia Environnement’s benefit obligations represented €1.96 billion, a decreasean increase of 5%around 15% compared to the end of 2006,2008, which is essentiallyprimarily due to changes in actuarial assumptions, and in particularalso linked to a rise in the actualization rate. Retirement planscurrency exchange effects. These obligations are mainly comprised of pension schemes with defined benefits accounted for 70% of this amount.  Other commitments relate to end of career(65%) and career-end indemnities senior executive retirement,(24%). The other obligations are mainly medical coverage for retirees, other work benefitslength of service reward payments and end of career compensation.   The consolidation of commitments was made over more than 60contract termination indemnities. These Group obligations exist in around 50 countries.

In 2007, our Group extended its policy of employee savings. We proposed a new share capital increaseShare subscription and purchase options

Options awarded to 195,515 employeesthe Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and exercised by them in 27 countries, representing approximately 33,000 more employees and 8 more countries than in 2006.   As a result of this transaction, close to 57,000 employees are shareholders of Veolia Environnement and collectively hold 1.63% of our share capital.

Ethics2009

Our presenceChairman and Chief Executive Officer were not awarded any share subscription or purchase options in nearly 70 countries around2009 and neither of them exercised any options or received bonus shares during the world requires usyear 2009.

Share subscription or purchase options granted to implement a set of principles in order to ensure compliance with various human rights normsthe top ten employees who are not corporate officers (mandataires sociaux) during 2009 and governance standards set forth under international laws and treaties.  

These principles must take into account our company’s cultural diversity and emphasize environmental protection above all, which is one of our company’s foremost concerns.  In addition, they must integrate our company’s traditional values, which are based on a close relationship with clients, consumers and civil society and the autonomy of each of our company’s operating divisions.

To this end, we implemented the “Ethics, Commitment and Responsibility” program in February 2003, which was updated in late 2004 and early 2008. This program is intended to guide the daily behavior of our employees. As part of the program, an ethics correspondent has been appointed in each division.options exercised during 2009

The program reaffirmstable below sets forth the fundamental values shared by all of our employees, including, for example, the need for strict observance of the laws in effect in the different countries where we operate, loyalty to our clients and to consumers, sustainable development, a sense of solidarity (tolerance, respect of others and social dialogue), management of risks and effective corporate governance.

In March 2004, we created an ethics committee to examine and settle any questions relatingshare subscription or purchase options granted to the ethics program. The ethics committee consists of three memberstop ten employees who are not corporate officers (mandataires sociaux) during 2009 and may investigate any matter that it wishes regarding Group ethics. Employees may also freely consult with the committee. The ethics committee must act independently and keep the information relating to the matters it treats confidential.options exercised during 2009:

From October 2004 to December 2005, our Group held fourteen training seminars relating to the “Ethics, Commitment and Responsibility” program, including three outside of France, for over 400 of our managers.  During 2007, we continued these actions by developing and deploying a training program and seminars on compliance with antitrust laws, open internationally to several thousand managers of our Group.

In addition, since 2005, we have implemented a reporting procedure to help combat fraud, which is overseen by our risk director and our director of finance.

Share subscription or purchase options granted to the top ten employees who are not corporate officers and exercised by them

Total number of options awarded / shares subscribed for or purchased

Average weighted price**

Plan number

Options awarded during the 2009 fiscal year by Veolia Environnement and any company within the option award perimeter, to the ten employees of Veolia Environnement and of any other company included within this perimeter, who were awarded the highest number of shares in this way

none

NA

NA

Options held on Veolia Environnement and the companies referred to above, which were exercised during the 2009 fiscal year, by the ten employees of Veolia Environnement and of said companies, for whom the number of options thus exercised is the highest*

4,917

36.65

No. 3

16,648

22.14

No. 4

3,519

24.32

No. 5


*

This does not include options exercised by employees who have left the Group.

**

Exercise price after legal adjustments.



130162



Back to Contents



SHARE OWNERSHIP

None of our directors and senior managers owns 1% or more of our shares. Our directors and senior managers as a group own less than 1% of our shares. Our directors and senior managersexecutive officers listed below were granted options to subscribe to shares of our company during the last five yearsCompany as follows:

 

Number of Options Initially Awarded(1)

Exercise Price(2)

Expiration Date

2002 Plan

   

Henri Proglio

220,000

€36.65

January 28, 2010

Jerôme Contamine(3)

65,000

€36.65

January 28, 2010

Antoine Frérot

45,000

€36.65

January 28, 2010

Denis Gasquet

45,000

€36.65

January 28, 2010

    

2003 Plan

   

Henri Proglio

220,000

€22.14

March 24, 2011

Jerôme Contamine

105,000

€22.14

March 24, 2011

Olivier Barbaroux

70,000

€22.14

March 24, 2011

Antoine Frérot

70,000

€22.14

March 24, 2011

Denis Gasquet

70,000

€22.14

March 24, 2011

Stéphane Richard(3)(4)

70,000

€22.14

March 24, 2011

    

2004 Plan

   

Henri Proglio

110,000

€24.32

December 24, 2012

Jerôme Contamine

70,000

€24.32

December 24, 2012

Eric Marie de Ficquelmont(4)(5)

40,000

€24.32

December 24, 2012

Olivier Barbaroux

40,000

€24.32

December 24, 2012

Antoine Frérot

40,000

€24.32

December 24, 2012

Denis Gasquet

40,000

€24.32

December 24, 2012

Stéphane Richard

40,000

€24.32

December 24, 2012

    

2006 Plan

   

Henri Proglio

150,000

€44.03

March 28, 2014

Jerôme Contamine

90,000

€44.03

March 28, 2014

Eric Marie de Ficquelmont

60,000

€44.03

March 28, 2014

Olivier Barbaroux

60,000

€44.03

March 28, 2014

Antoine Frérot

60,000

€44.03

March 28, 2014

Denis Gasquet

60,000

€44.03

March 28, 2014

Stéphane Richard

60,000

€44.03

March 28, 2014

    

2007 Plan(6)

   

Henri Proglio

110,000

€57.05

July 17, 2015

Jerôme Contamine

60,000

€57.05

July 17, 2015

Olivier Barbaroux

40,000

€57.05

July 17, 2015

Antoine Frérot

40,000

€57.05

July 17, 2015

Denis Gasquet

40,000

€57.05

July 17, 2015

Alain Tchernonog

40,000

€57.05

July 17, 2015

(1)

The numbers of shares which can be acquired upon the exercise of options under each plan except the 2007 Plan have been adjusted to take into account transactions affecting our share capital (issuance of free warrants for shares in December 2001 and share capital increases in August 2002 and July 2007).

(2)

The original exercise prices for all plans except the 2007 Plan have been adjusted to take into account transactions affecting our share capital (issuance of free warrants for shares in December 2001 and share capital increases in August 2002 and July 2007). The original exercise prices under each plan are stated below.

(3)

Mr. Jerôme Contamine is no longer an executive officer of our Company since January 2009.

(4)

Mr. Stéphane Richard is no longer a member of senior managementan executive officer of our companyCompany since May 31, 2007.

(4)(5)

Eric Marie de Ficquelmont is no longer a member of senior managementan executive officer of our companyCompany since January 2007.

(6)

As the performance criteria linked to the growth of the net earnings per share were not reached, the members of the Executive Committee and the senior managers lost 100% of their right under the 2007 Plan, i.e. 1,082,500 options and 29,500 SAR. The other managers lost 50% of their rights, which represent 660,150 options and 42,150 SAR.




131163



Back to Contents


Pursuant to the a three-year authorization granted by our general shareholders’ meeting of June 21, 2000, our former management board decided on June 23, 2000 to implement an “outperformance” stock option program. Under the program, we granted 29 of our principal managers options to purchase 780,000 treasury shares at €32.50 per share.  The total number of treasury shares eligible for sale and the exercise price have been adjusted to 735,635 shares and €31.41 per share, respectively, as a result of legal adjustments related to our issue of free warrants for shares in December 2001 and share capital increases in August 2002 and July 2007, and after subtraction of options cancelled due to the departure of employees. Options granted pursuant to this plan will expire in June 2008. As of December 31, 2007, 385,778 options had been exercised.

Pursuant to the same authorization, our former management board decided on February 8, 2001 to implement a stock option plan pursuant to which 1,500 of our employees (including six members of our former management board) received options to subscribe to a total of 3,462,000 newly-issued shares of our company at €42 per share, which was the fair market value of our shares at the time the options were granted.  The total number of newly-issued shares eligible for subscription and the exercise price have been adjusted to 3,578,039 shares and €40.59 per share, respectively, as a result of the legal adjustments described above and after subtraction of options cancelled due to the departure of employees. Options granted pursuant to this plan will expire in February 2009.  As of December 31, 2007, 1,836,563 of these options had been exercised.

Finally, pursuant to the same authorization, our former management board decided on January 28, 2002 to implement a stock option plan (plan No. 3) pursuant to which approximately 1,400 of our employees (including five members of our former management board) received options to subscribe to a total of 4,413,000 newly-issued shares of our companyCompany at €37.53 per share, which was the average market price over the 20 stock exchange days immediately preceding the date of the meeting of our management board. The total number of newly-issued shares eligible for subscription and the exercise price have been adjusted to 4,657,903 shares and €36.65 per share, respectively, as a result of the legal adjustments described above and after subtraction of options cancelled due to the departure of employees. Options granted pursuant to thist his plan will expire inexpired on January 28, 2010. As of December 31, 2007, 2,236,6472009, 2,351,868 options had been exercised. On the expiration date, a total of 2,385,941 shares had been subscribed for as a result of the exercise of these options. The remaining unexercised options were cancelled.

Pursuant to a newan authorization granted by our general shareholders’ meeting of April 25, 2002, our former management board decided on March 24, 2003 to implement a stock option plan (plan No. 4) pursuant to which approximately 1,740 of our employees (including six members of our former management board) received options to subscribe to a total of 5,192,635 newly-issued shares of our companyCompany at €22.50 per share. The total number of newly-issued shares eligible for subscription and the exercise price have been adjusted to 5,164,390 shares and €22.14 per share, respectively, as a result of the legal adjustments described above and after subtraction of options cancelled due to the departure of employees. Options granted pursuant to this plan will expire in March 2011. As of December 31, 2007, 2,784,6212009, 3,164,028 options had been exercised.

Pursuant to a new authorization granted by our general shareholders’ meeting of May 12, 2004, our boardBoard of directorsDirectors decided on December 24, 2004 to implement a stock option plan (plan No. 5) pursuant to which approximately 1,087 of our employees (including the seven members of our executive committee)Executive Committee in office at the time of award) received options to subscribe to a total of 3,341,600 newly-issued shares of our company, corresponding to approximately 0.82% of share capital on the day the plan was authorized, which represents slightly more than half of the total amount authorized by our general shareholders’ meeting,Company at €24.72 per share. The total number of newly-issued shares eligible for subscription and the exercise price have been adjusted to 3,392,012 shares and €24.32 per share, respectively, as a result of the legal adjustments described above and after subtraction of options cancelled due to the departure of e mployees.employees. Options granted pursuant will expire in December 2012. As of December 31, 2007, 35,5922009, 232,596 options had been exercised.

Pursuant to a new authorization granted by our general shareholders’ meeting of May 12, 2005, our boardBoard of directorsDirectors decided on March 28, 2006 to implement a stock option plan (plan No. 6) pursuant to which approximately 1,378 of our employees (including the 7seven members of our executive committee)Executive Committee in office at the time of award) received options to subscribe to a total of 4,044,900 newly-issued shares of our companyCompany at €44.75 per share, which reflected the average opening share prices of our shares in the 20 days preceding the boardBoard of directors’Directors’ decision. Such exercise price does not include any discount, in accordance with the general meeting’s authorization of May 12, 2005. The total number of newly-issued shares eligible for subscription and the exercise price have been adjusted to 4,110,406 shares and €44.03 per share, respectively, as a result of the legal adjustments described aboveabov e and after subtraction of options cancelled due to the departure of employees. Options granted pursuant to this plan will be exercisable from March 2010 and will expire in March 2014. As of December 31, 2007,2009, 1,300 options had been exercised in advance due to the death of a beneficiary, in accordance with French law.



132



Back to Contents


2007 fiscal year

During its meeting of March 29, 2007, following the recommendations of the nominationsNominations and compensation committee,Compensation Committee, the boardBoard of directorsDirectors defined our company’sCompany’s policy on incentive programs for senior executives and executives of our Group and decided that for certain categories of beneficiaries, this policy could combine the award of stock options and free shares. During its meeting of July 17, 2007, our board of Directors decided that stock options would be reserved for senior executives and that the free shares would be awarded to a large group of executives and “outstanding” non-executive employees, without combination of the two policies. In addition, in accordance with new provisions of the French Commercial Code resulting from the law of December 30, 2006 for the development of employee shareholding, our boardBoard of directorsDirectors set, as of the same date, the rules applicable to the chairmanChairman and chief executive officer’sChief Executive Officer’s obligation to retain all or part of his shares in registered form, which are held as a result of the exercise of options, until the end of the term of his office.

Pursuant to a new authorization granted by our general shareholders’ meeting of May 11, 2006 relating to the issuance of undiscounted share subscription and purchase options representing up to 1% of the share capital, our boardBoard of directorsDirectors decided on July 17, 2007 to implement a stock option plan (plan No. 7) pursuant to which 557 of our employees (including theseven members of our executive committee)Executive Committee in office at the time of award) received options to subscribe to a total of 2,490,400 newly-issued shares of our company,Company, corresponding to approximately 0.60% of share capital on the day the plan was authorized. The exercise price of the options has been set at €57.05 per share, which reflects the average opening prices of our shares in the 20 days preceding our boardBoard of directors’Directors’ decision.  The total number of newly-issued shares eligible for subscription has been adjusted to 2,473,900 shares, after adjustments arising from chang es in the situations of beneficiaries. Options granted pursuant to this plan will be exercisable from July 2011 and willwil l expire in July 2015.  This authorization is valid until July 11, 2008.  Pursuant to the board’s decision, options were awarded as follows:

Members of the executive committee: 330,000 options (13.2% of the total);

Category 1 (Main senior executives of our Group, excluding members of the executive committee): 811,000 options (32.6% of the total); and

Category 2 (Other senior executives of our Group): 1,349,400 options (54.2% of the total).

On July 17, 2007, our board of directors also decided that the plan would include an award to American residents of “stock appreciation rights” (SARs), which are the financial equivalents of share subscription options and replicate the exercise and performance terms of such options.  These SARs are valid for six years (compared with eight years for options) and may be exercised at the end of four years.  The exercise price of the SAR was set at € 57.20, which reflects the opening price of our shares on the date of our board of directors’ decision.  The acquisition period is identical to that of the options, that is, 4 years following the award decision.  Pursuant to our board of directors’ decision, 205,200 stock appreciation rights were awarded to 181 beneficiaries as follows:

Category 1 (Main senior executives of our Group, excluding executive committee members): 29,500 SARs (14.4% of the total)

Category 2 –(Other senior executives of our Group): 84,300 SARs (41.1% of the total)

Category 3 (Executives and “outstanding” non-executive employees): 91,400 SARs (44.5% of the total)


The acquisition of options and SARS awarded to the executive committee, as well as to categories 1 and 2 above is subject to a minimum growth of the net earnings per share (NEPS) between December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2008 according to the following rate:

 

NEPS< 10 %

NEPS >10 et <25 %

NEPS³ 25 %

Executive committee and Category 1

Percentage of award

0 %

Between 1% and 99% proportional to net earnings

100 %

Category 2

Percentage of award

50 %

Between 51% and 99% proportional to net earnings

100 %




133164



Back to Contents


As inPursuant to the caseboard’s decision, 2,490,400 share subscription options were awarded to 557 beneficiaries, including 330,000 options awarded to the members of the performance terms that applyExecutive Committee and 2,160,400 to the free shares,Group’s senior executives and other executives.

2008 fiscal year

The combined ordinary and extraordinary shareholders’ meeting of May 7, 2008 granted our Board of Directors authorization for 26 months, to award our employees and corporate officers (and those of our affiliates), undiscounted share subscription or purchase options, up to 1% of the SARs allocated to Category 3 will be permanently acquiredshare capital on the date of the award decision.

The Board of Directors held on March 25, 2008, decided that, in the event of an increaseaward in 2008, the definitive vesting of the options would be contingent on minimum growth in our net earnings per share as of December 31, 2008 equal20% over two years (2008-2009). This performance condition would have been applicable to or greater than 10% more thanbeneficiaries for the sole portion of the options awarded that asexceeded the threshold of December 31, 2006.10,000.

A resolution will be proposed toFinally, the authorization granted by the general shareholders’ meeting to be held onof May 7, 2008, concerning the grant of an authorization to our board of directors to award subscription options or share purchase options without discount to employees and/or officers of our company or its related companies for a maximum of 1% of our company’s aggregate share capital. This 26-month authorization would bewhich is valid until July 7, 2010.  In accordance with2010, was not used during the decision2008 fiscal year.

2009 fiscal year and 2010 general meeting

The authorization to award share subscription or purchase options granted by the general shareholders meeting of our board of directors of March 25,May 7, 2008, we will continuewhich is valid until July 7, 2010 was not used during the stock option policy we pursued in 2007,2008 and the acquisition of options will accordingly be partially subject to performance conditions.2009 fiscal years.

As of December 31, 2007,2009, a total of 22,944,53519,482,535 share subscription options had been granted, (plans n° 2 to 7), giving the right to subscribe to 15,287,14410,926,573 of our shares, after adjustments and exercises. Of this total, 8,810,360a total of 6,580,862 options were exercisable (plans n° 2exercisable.

On March 24, 2010, in accordance with the recommendations made by the Appointments and Compensation Committee, the Board of Directors defined the Company policy on incentive schemes for the Group’s managers and executive officers for the 2010 fiscal year. In this regard, the Board of Directors decided to 5).  Asfavor the award of stock options.

The Board decided that, should stock options be awarded during the fiscal year, the options would be reserved to the main executives and managers in the Group, except for the chaiman of the Board of Directors and for the Chief Executive Officer. Board of Directors also decided that the vesting of options would be contingent on modalities to be defined, for all beneficiaries, and on attaining return on capital employed (ROCE) of at least 8.4% as of December 31, 2007, the number of our shares before2012. The exercise price of the remainingoptions would be fixed with reference to the average of the last twenty stock options amountedmarket prices for Veolia Environnement shares (with no discount or premium).

In light of these policy decisions, the board decided to 470,719,806 shares. On this date, if all stock options (plans n°2 to 7) had been exercised, 15,287,144 new shares would have been issued, representing a dilution percentage in case of exercise of 3.25 %.

Grant of Free Shares

During itspropose that the general meeting of March 29, 2007, followingshareholders to be held on May 7, 2010 vote to approve a resolution that authorizes the recommendations of our nominations and compensation committee, our board of directors defined our policy concerning incentive plans for senior executives and executives of our Group and decided that certain categories of beneficiaries, excluding members of our executive committee and the main senior executives of our Group, could receive a combinedto award of stock options and free shares, with the acquisition of free shares subject in certain cases to performance criteria. During its meeting of July 17, 2007, our board of directors decided that free shares would be awarded to a large group of executives and “outstanding” non-executive employees without combining the stock options and free share award policies.

On July 17, 2007, upon the recommendation of the nominationsCompany and compensation committee, our board of directors decidedcompanies that are affiliated to implementit, for a freeperiod of twenty-six months, share award plan and to allocate a totalsubscription or purchase options, with no discount, capped at 1% of 333,700 shares (after adjustment by the board of directors on December 19, 2007, to account for all final share grants), representing 0.07% of our share capital on the date of the resolution.  In accordanceaward decision.

Our Board of Directors meeting of March 24, 2009 decided to give priority to stock option awards in 2009 and confirmed this decision at its March 24, 2010 meeting.



165



Back to Contents


Employee profit-sharing

Optional and mandatory profit-sharing contracts

Given the nature of our business, we are unable to allocate funds to the mandatory profit-sharing reserve provided for by law, and therefore have not entered into any related profit-sharing contracts. However, an optional profit-sharing plan applies to all our employees, which aims at aligning employees’ interests with the decisionresults of our boardthe Group in terms of directors,achieving specific growth objectives over a three-year period.

In general, we favor expanding optional profit-sharing plans in order for employees to have a vested interest in the shares were awardedprogress made by the specific Division to 2,232 Category 3 beneficiaries (executives and “outstanding” non-executive employees) in 18 countries, including France.  This category includes executive and non-executive employees with at least three years’ seniority who have achieved remarkable individual or collective results in pursuing their specific objectives.

The acquisition period for such shares dependswhich they are assigned, on the tax regime applicable.  In general, the acquisition period is set at two years for French residents (that is, until July 18, 2009), followed by a lock-up periodbasis of two years (until July 18, 2011), while residents of countries other than Francecriteria that are subject to an acquisition period of four years (until July 18, 2011), not followed by a lock-up period.

Free shares awarded to Category 3 beneficiaries are subjectspecifically adapted to the following performance terms:  they will be permanently acquired in the event of an increase of net earnings perbusiness concerned.

Company savings plans and employee share at December 31, 2008 equal to or greater than 10% more than that at December 31, 2006.

The authorization of our general shareholders’ meeting of May 10, 2007 (limited to 0.5% of our share capital), which is in effect until July 10, 2009, led to the grant in 2007 of 0.07% of our share capital on the day of the decision of our board of directors. Consequently, no new resolution shall be proposed at our general shareholders’ meeting to be held on May 7, 2008.

Company Savings Plan and Employee Share Ownership Policyownership policy

Since 2002, our employees have had the possibility of investing in various instruments of our Group’s savings plan, “Sequoia,”Group Savings Plan(GSP), called “Sequoia”, including diversified funds and an investment fundfunds invested in Veolia Environnementour shares.

After a first share capital increase reserved exclusively for French employees, we decided in 2004 to offer our foreign employees the possibility of acquiring shares in our companythe Company during reserved capital increases. The plan was progressively extended at the international level (it now covers 2729 countries, including France, and 29 countries, all mechanisms combined), with the ultimate goal of employees owning 5% of our outstanding share capital.  .



134



Back to Contents


Our employees have the choice ofWe offer two employee shareholder plans: a “classic” plan, in which the employee is exposed to variationschanges in ourlisted share price,prices, and a “secured”“low-risk” plan (with or without leverage), which protects the employeeemployees from a declinefall in the price of our shares while giving him or herthem the possibility to benefitof benefiting from a portion of anythe increase, as applicable.if the price rises.

Depending on the local conditions,particularities, the shares in these two plans were subscribed either directly or through French investment funds (Fonds Commun de Placement d’Entreprise - FCPEs)FCPEs (corporate mutual fund). Additionally,Additional, specific plans were put in place in the United Kingdom (the Share(Share Incentive Plan, which since 2006 enables employees to purchase shares of our company through a trust and pay for them through regular withdrawals from their salary)Plan) and in China (a global plan replicating(synthetic formula that replicates the economic conditions of the secured“low-risk” shareholder plan) in order to accommodate local variations incircumvent certain constraints, such as tax and exchange rate regulations.

A reviewThe most recent operation took place in the spring of subscription in 2007 indicates a high level of participation: out of the 216,153 current or retired employees eligible (all mechanisms included), 44,373 (or 20.53%) subscribed, resulting in a 43% increase in total contributions compared to 2006, of which 41,308 were towards our Group’s saving plan.   This subscription2009 and resulted in the issuanceissue of 3,061,675911,014 new shares, and a corresponding increase in our company’s share capitalrepresenting 0.18% of €15,308,375.   In addition, 188,771 new shares (representing 0.04% of our share capital) were issued following athe capital. This capital increase, which was reserved for Sequoia Souscription International – SAR, a subsidiary of Calyon, as part of the establishment of a structured offeremployees, was offered to 190,000 employees in countries where traditional employee shareholder plans are not available.  These two capital increases were finalized on December 12, 2007.  Giv en the share capital increases that occurred in 2002, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007, approximatelytwenty-three countries. Around 57,000 employees of ourthe Veolia Environnement Group currently own a totalnow hold shares in Veolia Environnement and, as of 1.63%the date of Veolia Environnement’s sharethis annual report on Form 20-F, hold 1.7% of the Company’s capital. In total, approximately 76,00070,000 employees have active accounts in our Sequoia savings plan, that is, more than one out of every three employeesopened an account in the countries in which our Group’s savings plan is available.


Veolia Environnement Group Savings Plan.



135166



Back to Contents


ITEM 7: 7.

MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS

The table below shows the number of shares and the corresponding percentages of share capital and voting rights held as of December 31, 2009 by Veolia Environnement’s principal known shareholders.

Each Veolia Environnement share entitles its holder to one vote. There are no shares with double voting rights or non-voting shares (however, the voting rights of treasury shares are not exercised).

To the Company’s knowledge, as of December 31, 2009 and the date of this annual report on Form 20-F, no shareholder other than those listed in the table below directly or indirectly held approximately 4% or more of the Company’s shares or voting rights. The Company has not received any declarations of threshold crossings from the shareholders below, except as described in the notes to the table below:

Shareholder at
December 31, 2009

Number of shares

Percentage of share capital

Number of voting rights

Percentage of voting rights***

Caisse des Dépôts(1)

47,273,114

9.58%

47,273,114

9.87%

Groupama(2)

28,234,444

5.72%

28,234,444

5.89%

Capital Group Companies(3)

22,252,765

4.51%

22,252,765

4.65%

EDF(4)

18,287,428

3.70%

18,287,428

3.82%

Veolia Environnement(5)

14,731,592

2.98%

0**

0%

Public and other investors

362,851,031

73.51%

362,851,031

75.77%

Total

493,630,374*

100%

478,898,782*

100%


*

This figure includes a capital increase of 31,011 shares pursuant to options exercised between July 1 and December 31, 2009 and recorded by the Board of Directors at its meeting of March 5, 2010. Issuing 31,011 shares with a par value of €5 each resulted in a capital increase of €155,055. At the conclusion of this transaction, the Company’s share capital had increased from 493,599,363 shares to 493,630,374 shares (see the Table of changes in capital in the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 18).

**

As of December 31, 2009 and the date of the annual report on Form 20-F, Veolia Environnement held 14,731,592 treasury shares.

***

Percentage of voting rights as a share of actual voting rights (Veolia Environnement treasury shares do not exercise voting rights).


(1)

According to the analysis of the Company’s shareholders as of December 31, 2009 and the most recent known declaration of threshold crossing of Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations filed with the Company on June 15, 2009 (AMF Decision and Information no. 209C0862 dated June 15, 2009).

(2)

According to the analysis of the Company’s shareholders as of December 31, 2009. To the best of our knowledge, Groupama’s most recent declaration of threshold crossing was filed on December 30, 2004 (AMF Decision and Information no. 205C0030 dated January 7, 2005).

(3)

Management companies acting on behalf of clients (U.S. mutual funds). Percentage of share capital and voting rights according to the analysis of the Company’s shareholders as of December 31, 2009. The analysis of the Company’s shareholders as of December 31, 2009 shows that companies of the Capital Group Companies group together hold 22,252,765 shares, representing 4.52% of the capital.

 (4)

 According to the statement of registered shareholders as of January 19, 2010 prepared by Société Générale (the account manager) and according to the analysis of the Company’s shareholders as of December 31, 2009. To the best of our knowledge, EDF’s most recent declaration of threshold crossing was filed on December 30, 2002 (Euronext notice no. 2002-4424 dated December 31, 2002). In that declaration, EDF reported that on such date it held 16,155,492 Veolia Environnement shares. Furthermore, in the amendment dated November 24, 2002 to the agreement dated June 24, 2002 described below, EDF stated that it would hold shares acquired in the Company as a financial investment, that it did not seek to influence the Company’s management and that it would exercise its voting rights solely for the purpose of enhancing the value of its investment.

(5)

Treasury shares without voting rights. This figure is included in the monthly report of transactions carried out by Veolia Environnement with respect to its own shares that was filed with the AMF on March 3, 2010.




167



Back to Contents


We received a notification from Group Industriel Marcel Dassault (GIMD) that on March 11, 2010, it crossed the 5% threshold for ownership of our shares and voting rights at December 31, 2007:

Shareholder

Number of shares

Percentage of share capital

Number of voting rights

Percentage of voting rights

Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations(1)

48,763,596

10.36%

48,763,596

10.70%

Capital Research Global Investors(2)

32,438,090

6.89%

32,438,090

7.12%

Groupama(3)

27,171,816

5.77%

27,171,816

5.96%

Natixis Asset Management(4)

21,227,870

4.51%

21,227,870

4.66%

EDF(5)

18,287,428

3.88%

18,287,428

4.01%

Veolia Environnement(6)

15,120,654

3.21%

0

0%

Public and other investors

307,710,352

65.37%

307,710,352

67.54%

Total

470,719,806

100%

455,599,152

100%

(1)

According to our company’s shareholder analysis of December 31, 2007.  To our company’s knowledge, Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations’ most recent filing with the AMF occurred on December 19, 2006 (Décision et Information AMF no. 206C2344 dated December 22, 2006).  The Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations declared that it was acting alone and that it may purchase additional shares based on market conditions, but that it did not intend to take control over our company.    

(2)

An investment division of asset management corporation Capital Research and Management Company, acting on behalf of its clients (American mutual funds).  According to Capital Research Global Investors’ most recent filing with the SEC on Schedule 13G dated February 11, 2008, reporting its ownership of our shares as of December 31, 2007. To our company’s knowledge, Capital Research and Management Company’s most recent filing with the AMF occurred on January 9, 2007 (Décision et Information AMF n°207C0072 dated January 10, 2007).

(3)

According to Company’s shareholder analysis of December 31, 2007.  To our company’s knowledge, Groupama’s most recent filing with the AMF occurred on December 30, 2004 (Décision et Information AMF n°205C0030 dated January 7, 2005).

(4)

According to our company’s shareholder analysis of December 31, 2007.

(5)

According to our company’s shareholder register (actionnaires nominatifs) as of December 31, 2007, which is maintained by Société Générale on our company’s behalf.  To our company’s knowledge, EDF’s most recent filing with the AMF occurred on December 22, 2002 (Euronext avis n°2002-4424 dated December 31, 2002).  EDF declared that it held 16,155,492 Veolia Environnement shares as of that date.  EDF further declared that it would hold the shares as a financial investment and that it did not seek to influence our company’s management, and that it would exercise its voting rights with the sole aim of enhancing the value of its investment.

(6)

As set forth in our company’s monthly filing with the AMF reporting transactions it has effected with respect to its own shares, filed with the AMF on January 4, 2008.



in our Company, by its ownership as of that date of 24,712,654 shares in our Company, representing 5.01% of our shares. According to the Schedule 13D/A filed by GIMD on April 8, 2010, it now holds 25,884,699 of our shares representing 5.09% of our shares. See Item 8: “Financial Information Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information – Significant Changes” below for a description of GIMD’s investment.

As of December 31, 2007,2009, we estimate that non-French investors held approximately 53%48% of our company’sCompany’s shares and French investors the remaining 47%52%.

We estimate that, as of December 31, 2007,2009, approximately 12488.9 million of our shares (representing approximately 26%21.8% of our share capital) were held by holders in the United States. As of December 31, 2007, 17,355,4552009, 23,187,843 of our shares (representing approximately 3.69%5.7% of our share capital) were held in the form of ADRs by 28164 registered ADR holders (including The Depository Trust Company). We estimate that, as of March 31, 2008,2010, there were approximately 27,40041,000 beneficial holders of our shares in the United States.

On July 10, 2007, we completed a capital increase in cash with maintenance of preferential subscription rights, which had been approved by our board of directors on June 10, 2007.  FollowingTo the transaction, 51,941,040 new shares with a nominal value of €5 were issued, thus increasing the share capital by €259,705,200.  The total amountCompany’s knowledge, there is no agreement between one or more of the capital increase, includingCompany’s other shareholders or any provision in a shareholders’ agreement or agreement to which the issuance premium, amounted to €2,581,469,688.  



136



Back to Contents


On December 12, 2007, we recorded an increase in share capital attributable to (i)Company is a capital increase reserved for current and retired employees of our company and our Group, in France and abroad, the subscription of which was achieved both directly and through several company investment funds, and (ii)party that could have a capital increase reserved for Sequoia Souscription International – SAR, a subsidiary of Calyon, in the context of the implementation of a structured share offer for employees from countries unable to participate in traditional employee shareholder plans.  Following the transaction, 3,250,446 new shares with a nominal value of €5 were subscribed at the prices of €48.18 and €60.23 (dependingmaterial impact on the plan), thus increasing theCompany’s share capital by €16,252,230, representing approximately 0.7% of our company’s share capital at the date the share capital increase was record ed.

To our knowledge, there are no shareholders’ or other agreements relating to our shares other than as described aboveprice, and there is no arrangementshareholders’ agreement or other agreement of such nature to which any significant non-listed subsidiary of the execution of which mayCompany is a party, other than the agreements with EDF described in Notes 36 and 39.3 to the 2009 consolidated financial statements. No third party controls Veolia Environnement and, to the Company’s knowledge, there is no agreement in existence that, if implemented, could at a subsequent date result in a change of control or takeover of our company.

the Company. The major shareholders of our companyCompany do not enjoy different voting rights from those of the other shareholders.

The following table summarizes changes in our principal shareholders (that directly or indirectly have held more than 4% of the Company’s shares) over the last three fiscal years*

 

At December 31, 2009

At December 31, 2008

At December 31, 2007

Shareholder

Number of shares

% of share capital

% of voting rights

Number of shares

% of share capital

% of voting rights

Number of shares

% of share capital

% of voting rights

Caisse des Dépôts

47,273,114

9.58

9.87

47,273,114

10.00

10.33

48,763,596

10.36

10.70

EDF

18,287,428

3.70

3.82

18,287,428

3.87

4.00

18,287,428

3.88

4.01

Groupe Groupama

28,234,444

5.72

5.89

26,221,588

5.55

5.73

27,171,816

5.77

5.96

Capital Group Companies **

22,252,765

4.51

4.65

43,690,699

9.25

9.55

55,741,994

11.84

12.23


*

Figures are taken from the 2009, 2008 and 2007 reference documents filed with our French regulator, theAutorité des marchés financiers.

**

Figures for Capital Group Companies have been combined to take into account the percentages of the Company’s share capital and voting rights held by all companies of that group.




137168



Back to Contents



RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

WeOther than as disclosed below, we have no “related-party transactions” within the meaning of Item 7B
of Form 20-F.

Caisse des Depots is a 9.58% shareholder in our Company and is participating in the contemplated transaction between Veolia Transport and Transdev, as described below in this Form 20-F.

Société Générale is a 0.15% shareholder in our Company and until May 6, 2009 shared a Board member with us (Mr. Bouton). It participates in financing relationships with our Company that are conducted on market terms and owned a €17.6 million receivable with respect to our Company at December 31, 2008, which had been entirely discharged as at December 31, 2009.

On November 25, 2009, Mr. Henri Proglio was named the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Group EDF by decree from the French Counsel of Ministers. EDF is 3.70% shareholder in Veolia Environnement, a 34% shareholder in Dalkia and a 25% shareholder in Dalkia International and has commercial relations with our Company.

We have disclosed certain transactions in Note 4039 to our consolidated financial statements pursuant to a definition of “related-party transactions” under IFRS that is different from the definition contained in Item 7B of Form 20-F.



138169



Back to Contents


ITEM 8: 8.

FINANCIAL INFORMATION,

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Please refer to the consolidated financial statements and thein particular, with regard to tax audits and disputes, notes 35 and 42 thereto contained in Item 18.

Litigation

We are involved from time to time in various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of our business. The most significant litigation involving our companyCompany or its subsidiaries is described below. Other than as described below, there are no other current or threatened legal, governmental or arbitral proceedings involving our companyCompany or its subsidiaries, that either had during the past twelve months, that either had or that may in the futurewere likely to have a material adverse effect on the results of operations or financial condition of our companyCompany or the group.Group.

As of December 31, 2007,2009, the aggregate amount of our provisions for litigation was €426.9€417.4 million including all types of litigation (that is, tax, employee-related and other litigation). The aggregate amount of reserves accrued by our groupGroup in respect of all litigation in which we or our subsidiaries are involved (see Note 1716 to our consolidated financial statements included in Item 18 of this annual report), includes a large number of claims and proceedings that, individually, are not material to our businesses. The largest individual reserve accrued in our financial statements in 2007as of December 31, 2009 relating to litigation, amountsother than tax and labour disputes, amounted to approximately €19€17.2 million.

Veolia Eau – Compagnie Générale des Eaux


On February 27, 2001, the French Competition Council (Conseil de la concurrence)notified Compagnie Générale des Eaux of a complaint alleging that several joint ventures that it had formed with other water services companies affected the level of competition in the market. On July 11, 2002, the Council rejected the allegations of anticompetitive collusion (entente anticoncurrentielle) among these water services companies, refusing both to impose monetary sanctions or issue an injunction against these companies. However, the Council found that the joint ventures constituted a “collective dominant position” in the market and requested the French Ministry of the Economy, Finance and Industry to take all necessary measures to modify or terminate this pooling arrangement. Compagnie Générale des Eaux challenged this finding, initially beforebe fore the Paris Court of Appeals, which confirmed the Council’s position. However, the commercial section of the French Supreme Court (Cour de cassation), in a decision dated July 12, 2004, overturned the Paris Court of Appeals’ decision, holding that only administrative authorities had jurisdiction over the matter. Accordingly, Compagnie Générale des Eaux challenged the Council’s finding before the FrenchConseil d’Etat.  The latter, which held that the complaint was inadmissible (decision of November 7, 2005), since the Council’s decision was only a preparatory act for the decision of the French Ministry of Economy, Finance and Industry. In lightconnection with the investigation by the Minister of Economy of the nature of this mattermeasures to be implemented pursuant to the Council’s decision, the relevant companies were asked to reach a mutually satisfactory solution. On December 19, 2008, Compagnie Générale des Eaux signed an agreement with Lyonnaise des Eaux France (Suez Group) to unwind the joint ventures within twelve months, subject to monitoring by the relevant European competition authorities.

In a decision dated July 30, 2009, the European Commission announced that it did not oppose a proposed transaction and found that such transaction was compatible with the common market and the lackEEA agreement, without any conditions or charges. The proposed transaction involved Veolia Eau-Compagnie Générale des Eaux acquiring exclusive control of any judgment against our company thus far, we have not accruedthree of the joint companies at issue. The European Commission rendered a reserve for its potential outcome.similar decision in favor of Lyonnaise des Eaux France regarding the companies allocated to it. The unwinding operations were completed on March 22, 2010. These were concluded pursuant to the agreement of December 19, 2008, as completed by two contractual amendments, the most recent of which was signed on February 3, 2010. They were completed after approval of the European Commission, which had been re-notified (due to a change in the scope of the business of the companies allocated to Lyonnaise des Eaux pursuant to the most recent amendment).



170



Back to Contents


AES

On February 15, 2006, the company Aquatraitements Energies Services (“AES”)(AES) brought a complaint before the Paris Commercial Court of Paris (Tribunal de Commerce de Paris) relating toagainst two of Veolia Eau’s subsidiaries (Veolia Water and Seureca Overseas). AES is seeking €150 million in damages and interest from Veolia Water and Seureca Overseas, based on the  claimclaiming that it lost potential consulting fees following Veolia Water’s decision not to participate in a public bid tender launchedcall for bids initiated by the authorities of Abu Dhabi for the construction of a seawater treatment facility. On June 2, 2004, Veolia Water and Seureca Overseas had signed two consulting contracts with AES, pursuant to which AES was supposed to provide consulting advice on commercial strategy and public relations. Under the terms of the contracts, AES would receive fees based on the amount of theany contract won b yawarded to either Veolia Water or Seureca Overseas as a result of AES’ assistance. In December 2004, Veolia Water and Seureca Overseas terminated these contracts following theirthe discovery of actions taken by the managers of AES that they considered to be fraudulent (dolosives), and that would have affectedthey considered had vitiate their ability to consent to the contracts at the time of signing.the contracts were signed. On June 28, 2006, Veolia Water and Seureca Overseas submitted theirfiled a defense rejectingbrief requesting that all of AES’s claims before the Commercial Court on June 28, 2006. After several months of silence, AES filed its brief in response before the Commercial Court in which, inbe denied. In light of the arguments developedmade by Veolia Water and Seureca Overseas in their brief of June 28, 2006, AES reduced its damages claim to €15 million. Veolia Water and Seureca Overseas filed anothera responsive brief in response before the Commercial Court in which AES reduced its claim for damages to €15 million. After several more briefs were exchanged between the parties, on September 5, 2007,April 7, 2009, AES made an additional damages claim for an amount between €25 million and €50 million for commissions it alleged were owed to it as a result of various transactions completed by the Group in the region. After several procedural hearings during which each party filed one more briefs , the matter was postponed to January 26, 2010 in order to schedule the date of the pleadings hearing. However, on December 3, 2009, all parties signed a settlement agreement concluded without significant impact on the Company’s financial position. As a result, the Commercial Court, in its decision dated January 26, 2010, has noted the termination of the proceedings.

Aquiris

Since 2008, Aquiris, a 99% subsidiary of the Company, has held a concession pursuant to which AES responded on February 20, 2008 reconfirming its claim. Consequently,it is responsible for operating the endBrussels-North wastewater treatment plant. As a result of extensive obstruction of the procedural dispute is nearplant’s security chambers following the arrival of abnormal and tr ial onextraordinary quantities of gravel and other solid waste through the merits should take placepublic sewer lines, Aquiris decided to halt operation of the plant from December 8 to December 19, 2009 due to significant safety risks to persons and to the plant. This stoppage permitted a partial return to normal, but has resulted in several disputes regarding liability for the next several months. A judgment is likely to be rendered beforedisruption and the endpossible environmental consequences of 2008. We believethe halt in wastewater treatment services. At this point, the Company believes that AES’s allegations and in particular, its €15 million damages claim, have no legal or economic merit and that such litigationthese disputes will not have a material effectsignificant impact on theits financial condition of our Group, and accordingly have not accrued a reserve in respect of the potential outcome.



139



Back to Contents


Sade

In April 2000, Sade, a subsidiary of Veolia Eau, and 40 other companies received notice from the French Competition Council of a complaint alleging anticompetitive agreements  among these companies in respect of 44 public sector construction contracts in the Ile-de-France region (which includes Paris and its suburbs).  These companies, including Sade, filed their responses to the complaint in September 2000.  The Council filed a supplemental complaint in November 2001, which replaced its original complaint and reduced the number of construction contracts subject to scrutiny.  The companies filed responses to the new complaint in January 2002.  However, on October 26, 2004, the Council filed a second supplemental complaint, the stated objective of which was to clarify and supplement the information contained in the earlier complaints.  In response to the report received in August 2005, Sade filed a response in October 2005 that contested the Council’s complaint on the merits as well as based on irregularities in the complaint procedure that undermined its right to a proper defense, as well as the lack of proof of Sade’s alleged anti-competitive behavior in certain markets.  On March 21, 2006, the Council retained complaints against Sade in respect of 2 markets, and imposed a fine of €5.4 million relating to this matter. Sade has accrued a reserve in its accounts to cover this litigation, and appealed this decision before the Paris Court of Appeals on June 16, 2006. Hearings took place on March 26 and 27, 2008.  The Paris Court of Appeals is currently deliberating..

In addition, on June 9, 2005 the French Competition Council issued a ruling against eleven companies (including Sade) in respect of a complaint alleging anticompetitive behavior (providing information prior to the bid process) for various public works contracts in the Meuse department from 1996 to 1998. Sade was implicated with respect to one such contract, which was awarded to a competitor in 1998.  Under this ruling, Sade was fined €5 million, which it has already paid. Sade has filed an appeal with the Paris Court of Appeals, which confirmed the Council’s decision on April 25, 2006. Sade appealed this decision before the French Supreme Court  on May 24, 2006.  On November 6, 2007, the French Supreme Court rejected this appeal, ending the case.position.

WASCO and Aqua Alliance InternationalInc.


Several presentcurrent and former indirect subsidiaries of Veolia Eau in the United States1 arehave been named as defendants in lawsuits in the United States in which the plaintiffs seek to recoverrecovery for personal injuryinjuries and other damages for allegedallegedly due to exposure to asbestos, silica and other potentially harmfulhazardous substances. With respect to the lawsuits against Veolia Eau’s former subsidiaries, certain of Veolia Eau’s current subsidiaries remain liableretain liability and at times mustin certain cases manage the outcomesdefense of such claims.the lawsuits. In addition, in certain instances, Veolia Eau or Veolia Environnement has agreed to hold harmless the acquirorsbuyers of Veolia Eau’s former subsidiaries in certain instances benefit from guarantees given by Veolia Eau or by Veolia Environnement in respect of suchthese lawsuits. These lawsuits typically allege that the plaintiffs’ injuries resulted from the use of products manufactured or sold by Veolia Eau’s presentcurrent or former subsidiariessubsid iaries or their predecessors. There are ge nerallygenerally numerous other defendants in addition to Veolia Eau’s presentcurrent or former subsidiaries, which are accused of having contributed to the injuries.injuries alleged. Reserves have been accrued by Veolia Eau’sbooked for the possible liability of current subsidiaries for their estimated liability in these cases, basedinter alia on among other things, the nexus between the injuries claimed and the products manufactured or sold by Veolia Eau’sthese subsidiaries or their predecessors, the extent of the injuries allegedly sustained by the plaintiffs, the involvement of other defendants and the settlement history in similar cases. These reserves are accruedbooked at the time such liabilities becomeliability becomes probable and can be reasonably estimable,assessed, and do not include reserves for possible liabilitiesliability in respectlawsuits that have not been initiated.

As of unasserted claims.  

Athe date of this annual report on Form 20-F, a number of such claims have been resolved to date either through settlement or dismissal. To date, none of the claims has been triedresulted in a finding of liability.


1

Subsidiaries of the Aqua Alliance group or of WASCO (formerly Water Applications & Systems Corporation and United States Filter Corporation), the parent company of the former U.S. Filter group, most of whose businesses were sold to a verdict.  various buyers in 2003 and 2004.



171



Back to Contents


During the five-year period ended December 31, 2007, our company’s2009, the average annual costs relating tothat the Company has incurred in relation with these claims, including amounts paid to plaintiffs, and legal fees and case expenses, have been approximately US$2.51.9 million, excluding anyafter reimbursements by insurance companies. Although it is possible that these expenses may increase in the future, wethe Company currently havehas no reason to believe that any material increase is likely to occur, nor do wedoes it expect these claims to have a material adverse effect on ourits business, financial conditionposition or results of operations.operating results.

1  Subsidiaries of the Aqua Alliance group, or of WASCO (formerly named Water Applications & Systems Corporation and United States Filter Corporation), the leading company of the former U.S. Filter group, the major businesses of which were sold to various acquirors in 2003 and 2004.



140



Back to Contents


Veolia Water North America Operating Services


Atlanta

In 2002, Veolia Water North America Operating Services (“VWNAOS”)(VWNAOS), a subsidiary of our company,the Company, entered into a ten-year contract with the city of Atlanta, representing annual revenuesrevenue of about US$10 million. This contract involvesinvolved the operation of various slurry and effluent treatment plants for the city, the maintenance and renovation of equipment engineering of equipment and the design and planningcompletion of a construction program for plant renovation.renovation work. On June 19, 2006, VWNAOS brought an action against the city of Atlanta before the United States District Court, alleging the city’s failure to respect its investment obligations, reimburse additional costs of operation and pay bills issued in consideration for services provided. At this time, VWNAOS estimates its damages to be at least US$25 million, excluding damages resulting from furthersubject to adjustments which may arise overduring the course of the procedure.proceedings. On July 10, 2006, the city of Atlanta unilaterally cancelled the contract and, in turn, brought an action against VWNAOS, alleging VWNAOS’VWNAOS’s failure to fulfill certain of its obligations during the executionperformance of the contract. The city is seeking indemnitiescompensation of approximately US$35 million againstfrom VWNAOS and has also brought an action against Veolia Environnement directly, in its capacity as VWNAOS’s guarantor under the contract. In connection with this dispute, the city has drawn on the US$9.5 million bank guaranteeletter of credit issued to VWNAOS at the start of the contract. VWNAOS believes this move is unjustifiable.  AFollowing pre-trial discovery procedure allowing each party to request documents fromand motions by both sides seeking summary judgment, in orders issued on December 8, 2008 and September 24, 2009, the other begancourt partially denied VWNAOS’s claims and scheduled a trial on September 1, 2006 and is ongoing.  We contestall remaining claims for June 21, 2010. Because the court has denied VWNAOS’s claim on the grounds of the city’s claims and intends to defend ourselves vigorously.   A trial datewrongful termination of the contract, the amount of VWNAOS’s claim has not yet been set byreduced accordingly. Taking this adjustment into account, the District Court.  At this point in the procedure, we believeCompany believes that this matter will not have a significants ignificant impact on our fi nancial situation.its financial position.

Indianapolis

In April 2008, two subsidiaries of our subsidiaries,the Company, Veolia Water North America Operating Services and Veolia Water Indianapolis, LLC (VWI), were named as defendants in two putativepotential class action lawsuitsactions filed inbefore the Indiana state courts, in which thehave since been consolidated. The plaintiffs have allegedallege that the meter-reading practices used by VWI for Indianapolis customers were inconsistent with VWI’s contract with the local water authorityauthorities and statewith Indiana consumer protection law. The plaintiffs have claimedclaim that VWI billed customers on the basis of estimates of water usage, rather than actual usage, more frequently than the contract permitted, resulting in overchargesoverbilling that, whilealthough later credited to the customers, deprived the customers of their money for a period of time. They haveThe plaintiffs also claimedcontend that the methodology usedmethods applied by VWI to estimate water usage was flawedconsumption were inappropriate and not approved under relevant regulations.violated applic able laws. The plaintiffs are seeking to c ertifycertification of a class of similarly situated residential water customers. VWI believes that its billing and meter reading practices complied with its contract and with relevant laws and regulations, and that the claims of the plaintiffs are without merit. It intends to defend its interests vigorously. WhileOn January 13, 2009, the earlycourt granted a motion to dismiss filed by Veolia Water North America Operating Services and VWI, but granted the plaintiffs leave to refile their complaint. On January 23, 2009, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint against Veolia Water North America Operating Services and VWI, and also named the water department of the city of Indianapolis as a defendant. All defendants have filed motions with the court requesting that the amended complaint be dismissed. However, the date of the hearing to rule on these motions was deferred to give the parties the opportunity to attempt mediation. Mediation was conducted on April 6, 2010, but was not success ful. Accordingly, it is anticipated that the hearing on the dismissal motions will soon be scheduled by the court. Although the preliminary stage of these lawsuitsproceedings makes it impossible to determineestimate its potential financial consequences, the potential loss, we believeCompany believes that these lawsuits will not materially and adverselysignificantly affect our results of operations, liquidityits financial position or financial position.  results.



172



Back to Contents


Veolia Transport


DGCCRF – Veolia Transport

In 1998, the DGCCRF (a French administrative body with jurisdiction over competition oversight)matters) conducted an inspection and performed seizuresseized evidence on the premises of ourthe Company’s transportation subsidiary Connex (now Veolia Transport) and other companies in the public transportation market, withfor the purpose of obtaining proof relating to possible anti-competitive practices in this market. In February 2003, Veolia Transport was informed that the French Ministry of Economy, Finance and Industry had requested the French Competition Council to render a decision on the merits in this matter.  In September 2003, the French Competition Council notified Veolia Transportserved notice of two grievances that suggestedon Veolia Transport alleging possible collusion among operators between 1994 and 1999 which mightmay have had the effect of limitinglimited competition at the local and national level in the public passenger transportation market relating tofor urban, inter-urban and school services between 1994 and 1999.services. In September 2004, the French Competition Council notifiedserved Veolia Transport ofwith additional grievances alleging the existence of an anticompetitive agreement (entente anticoncurrentielle) at the European Union level. In January 2005, the judge advocate (rapporteur) of the French Competition Council transmitted his conclusions, in which one of the sub-claims was dismissed. On July 5, 2005, the French Competition Council issued a decision in which it partially validated the findingsclaims of the publiccompetition authorities, and ordered Veolia Transport to pay a fine of approximately €5 million. Veolia Transport paid this fine and filed an appeal,million, which the Company paid. The Paris Court of Appeals rejectedaffirmed the decision of the Competition Council on February 7, 2006. On2006 and on March 7, 2006, Veolia Transport filed an appeal with the French Supreme Court. The French Supreme Court approvedfound in favor of certain arguments advancedmade by Veolia Transport and, in its decision dated October 9, 2007, overturnedreversed the decision of the Court of Appeals of Paris and resubmittedremanded the claimcase to a different panel of the same court. &nb sp;On October 8, 2009, Veolia Transport brought the case before this newly-constituted appellate panel. A hearing took place on April 6, 2010 and the Paris Court of Appeals is set to deliver its verdict on June 15, 2010.

Connex Railroad

On September 12, 2008, a suburban train operated by Connex Railroad LLC, a Veolia Transport subsidiary, on behalf of the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA), collided with a Union Pacific freight train in Chatsworth, California. This accident resulted in 25 fatalities and a significant number of injuries. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), a federal agency, with which Connex Railroad is cooperating, reached a preliminary conclusion that the two causes of the accident were, first, lack of attention by the engineer, who did not observe a red light and, second, the fact that the SCRRA had not installed an automatic train braking system in compliance with prior recommendations of the NTSB. Actions seeking an undetermined amount of total damages have been filed by the heirs of the deceased passengers and the majority of injured passengers, in the courts of the state of California in Los Angeles, against Connex Railroad LLC, its parent company, Veolia Transportation Inc., the SCRRA and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. These actions have been consolidated into a single case. A hearing specifically dedicated to the issue of liability is scheduled for November 2010. At the same time, Connex Railroad LLC and the SCRRA have brought before the federal courts in California their disputes concerning their respective contractual liability in connection with the suits filed as a result of this accident and are still awaiting a hearing date. A U.S. federal statute limits the total amount of damages that may be awarded for injuries and property damage arising from a single passenger rail accident to U.S.$200 million. Notice of this accident has been given to the relevant insurers of the Group. At this point, the Group is unable to determine whether the financial consequences of this accident could significantly affect its financial position or results.

Société Nationale Maritime Corse Méditerranée (SNCM)

On September 19, 2006, Compagnie Méridionale de Navigation (CMN) and Corsica Ferries filed a complaint before the French Competition Council alleging anti-competitive practices by SNCM, a subsidiary of Veolia Transport, the Corsican Regional Authority and the Corsican Transportation Bureau for the purpose of restricting or eliminating competition during a call for bids initiated to delegate the Marseille-Corsica public transportation service. On December 11, 2006, the Competition Council dismissed the claim that a cartel existed between the Corsican Regional Authority, the Corsican Transportation Bureau and SNCM, and denied the claims of excessive subsidies and cross-subsidies asserted by Corsica Ferries. However, the Competition Council found that the overall indivisible offer of SNCM was likely to constitute an abuse of dominant position. Although it relates to a call for bids that was invalid ated by a decision of the Conseil d’Etat in December 2006, the Competition Council investigated the case and a hearing was held on December 9, 2008. In a decision dated February 27, 2009, the Competition Council ruled against SNCM and levied a fine of €300,000 for abuse of dominant position. SNCM decided to appeal this decision to the Paris Court of Appeals. In a decision dated March 9, 2010, the Paris Court of Appeals affirmed the Competition Council’s decision and SNCM filed an appeal against this decision.



173



Back to Contents


In a second case brought before the Competition Council after a second call for bids procedure was initiated following the decision of the Conseil d’Etat, Corsica Ferries contended that SNCM and CMN had formed an unjustified grouping that constituted an anti-competitive cartel, that this grouping constituted an abuse of a dominant position and, lastly, that presenting a bid requesting excessive subsides, suggesting the existence of cross-subsidies, constituted an abuse of a dominant position. On April 6, 2007, the Competition Council dismissed the two claims concerning the grouping. Proceedings on the merits and the investigation of the French Competition Authority (formerly, the Competition Council) on the claim of excessive subsidies are underway. The investigation is also focusing on the performance terms of this agreement delegating a public service (monitoring the applicat ion of the guaranteed receipts clause and the corresponding changes in the amount of subsidies received by the parties being awarded the contract). As of this date, no complaint has been served.

In addition, Corsica Ferries brought suit before the administrative courts, which ended in a decision by the Conseil d’Etat in December 2006 and a second call for bids procedure. Following a new complaint of Corsica Ferries with respect to this second bid procedure, its request for the invalidation of the decision of June 7, 2007 awarding the contract for marine service to Corsica to the SNCM/CMN group for the 2007-2013 period was denied by a judgment of the Bastia administrative court on January 24, 2008. Corsica Ferries appealed this decision to the Marseille administrative court of appeal. The case may be heard in 2010.

Lastly, Veolia Transport’s acquisition of an interest in SNCM was conditioned on the European Commission approving the privatization provisions concerning state assistance. The French government was responsible for this procedure in Brussels and filed briefs on November 16, 2006 and April 27, 2007. The European Commission ruled on July 8, 2008 that the amounts paid by the French government in connection with the privatization process either did not constitute state assistance or were compatible with the common market. Corsica Ferries and the STIM d’Orbigny (Stef Tfe group) have each appealed the Commission’s decision before the European Court of First Instance. On July 1, 2009, the French government and SNCM were granted leave to intervene in support of the conclusions of the Commission, which raised the defense that the appeal of STIM d’Orbigny was inadmissible. SNCM filed its brief on September 28, 2009, to which Corsica Ferries replied on November 26, 2009.

Veolia Propreté

On April 16, 2008, Termo Energia Calabria S.p.a. (TEC), a company specialized in waste incineration and a 90% subsidiary of Veolia Servizi Ambientali Tecnitalia S.p.a. (VSAT), which is in turn a 75% subsidiary of Veolia Propreté, filed a claim with the administrative court of the region of Calabria in Italy for the payment of subsidies in an updated amount of €26.9 million, allegedly owed under a concession agreement entered into on October 17, 2000 with the region of Calabria. On August 11, 2008, the administrative court ordered the region to respond to this claim. At the end of November 2008, the region announced its refusal to pay the subsidies claimed. In addition, on May 16, 2008, TEC filed a claim with an Italian arbitration tribunal against the Extraordinary Commissioner of Calabria seeking reimbursement of €62.2 million for various additional operating fees and costs incurred since 2005 and claiming breach of the price indexation provision included in the concession agreement. The arbitration proceedings began and, on October 24, 2008, the Extraordinary Commissioner of Calabria filed a counterclaim against TEC seeking the termination of the concession agreement and the payment of the sum of €62.3 million as compensation for construction delays. The Company considers the Commissioner’s claims to be groundless and therefore has not yetbooked any provisions for this dispute.

In addition, VSAT has been servedaccused of manipulating the software that monitors carbon monoxide emissions in its incineration facilities in Falascaia, Vercelli and Brindisi. In all three cases, VSAT filed a “John Doe” complaint in June 2008, August 2008 and February 2009, respectively, each of which is currently being investigated.

For all of these reasons, in early 2009 Veolia Propreté decided to initiate negotiations with the Italian company Termomeccanica Ecologia S.p.a. pursuant to the parties,seller’s guarantee granted by Termomeccanica Ecologia S.p.a. in the agreement pursuant to which VSAT was sold to Veolia Propreté in 2007. In light of the repeated refusal of Termomeccanica Ecologia S.p.a. to compensate VSAT pursuant to its guarantee, on May 19, 2009, Veolia Propreté and Veolia TransportServizi Ambientali S.p.a., the parent companies of VSAT, filed a request for arbitration with the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC). The arbitration tribunal was formed in August 2009 and has yetset a schedule calling for a hearing in December 2010 and an award in June 2011 at the earliest.

Under these circumstances, the relations between the Board members of VSAT and those of the 25% minority owner, the company SIEE, have been strained. SIEE has filed a request for the judicial revocation of the VSAT Board Members and the designation of an administrator appointed by the court. On October 1, 2009, SIEE’s request was denied by the court of La Spezia, but an order of the Genoa Appeals Court, served on VSAT on February 24, 2010 named an administrator appointed by the court, starting from March 4, 2010 and whose mandate shall be to submit an appealprepare a report within a maximum six-month delay.

At this point, the Company is not in a position to that court.predict whether the outcome of these actions will have a significant impact on its financial position or results.



141174



Back to Contents


Société Nationale Maritime Corse Méditerranée (SNCM)Veolia Energy

Our affiliate SNCM is involvedDalkia

On September 3, 1970, a concession agreement was concluded between Prodith, a subsidiary of Dalkia France, and the Lyon metropolitan authority (Communauté Urbaine de Lyon), which called for the construction and operation, for an initial 30-year period, of a public heating and cooling system service on behalf of the Lyon metropolitan authority. Following the decision of the Lyon metropolitan authority to terminate the agreement early on January 21, 2003 and the disagreement between the parties concerning the compensation owed to Prodith, Prodith brought an action before the Lyon administrative court seeking a judgment ordering the Lyon metropolitan authority to pay it €58.7 million. In a judgment issued on May 16, 2007, the Lyon administrative court denied Prodith’s claims for compensation on the grounds that the concession agreement and the amendments theret o were void because the Lyon metropolitan authority lacked the power to sign the agreement in 1970. Prodith appealed that judgment, while amending its indemnity claim to demand only €47.8 million. In a numberdecision dated October 22, 2009, the Lyon administrative court of legal proceedings relating directly and indirectlyappeal reversed the judgment of the administrative court but nevertheless held that the agreement was void due to the bidding processLyon metropolitan authority’s lack of power to sign it and, on those grounds, found that the Lyon metropolitan authority was not contractually liable. With regard to the consequences of this invalidity, the Court denied Prodith’s claims for contractscompensation on the non-contractual grounds that the company had not proved that it had been impoverished because it had generated profits during the performance of the agreement, and it denied Prodith’s claim for lost profits on the grounds that the agreement had been performed for its full term. However, the Court confirmed Prodith’s property rights to provide ferry service between Marseille and Corsica.  Veolia Transport owns 28%the land on w hich the Lafayette thermal power plant is located. On December 22, 2009, the company appealed the decision of SNCM’s share capital, and we fully consolidate SNCM in our consolidated financial statements as a result of control rights under a shareholders’ agreement.October 22, 2009 to the Conseil d’Etat.

The first legal proceeding involves SNCM’s direct and indirect shareholding in Compagnie Méridionale de Navigation (CMN).  SNCM holds directly 45% of CMN’s share capital.  It also holds a 45% interest in Compagnie Méridionale de Participation (CMP), which in turn holds 53% of CMN’s share capital.  SNCM entered into a shareholders’After the agreement with Prodith was terminated, the other shareholderLyon metropolitan authority initiated a competitive bid procedure to award the contract for providing a public heating and cooling system service. At the conclusion of CMP, STIM of Orbigny (Stef Tfe group),this procedure, the contract was awarded to Dalkia France, which among other things, gave either partywas replaced by its subsidiary, Elvya. That contract was signed on July 23, 2004. In a judgment dated December 15, 2005, the right to trigger a purchase or sale option involving CMP shares inLyon administrative court invalidated the event of a modification of CMN’s strategy bydecision empowering the other party that results in a major conflict between the shareholders. SNCM notified STIM in July 2006 that it was exercising its option to purchase 25%president of the share capitalLyon metropolitan authority to sign the agreement with Dalkia France on the grounds that there had been no prior consultation of the CMP (to bring SNCM’s interest to 70%Lyon metropolitan authority’s joint committee (comité mixte paritaire), and that the principle requiring equal treatment of all bidders had been breached as a result of a disagreementlate change in the bid package. The court held that impeded the abilitynature of t hethe defects af fecting the decision to sign the agreement delegating this public service necessarily invalidated the agreement. In a decision dated February 8, 2007, the Lyon administrative court of appeals affirmed this judgment and gave the parties a period of 18 months to submitattempt to rescind the agreement in an amicable manner. Because no amicable resolution proved possible, on June 25, 2007, the Lyon metropolitan authority brought an action before the Lyon administrative court requesting a joint bid for the Marseille-Corsica ferry contract.  

STIM contested both the validityrescission of the agreement and a finding on damages. Elvya claimed compensation in the rightamount of SNCM to exercise its option.  As required by€68.8 million. In a judgment dated October 22, 2009, the shareholders’court rescinded the agreement SNCM brought an action against STIM beforeand held that, on the Commercial Courtgrounds of Paristhe metropolitan authority’s tortious conduct inducing reliance (Tribunal de Commerceresponsabilité quasi contractuelle), Elvya was entitled to be compensated for its necessary expenditures, the amount of which ruled in favorwas to be determined by a panel of SNCM in October 2006.  In December 2006, the Paris Court of Appeals reversed the decision, holding that STIM had validly cancelled the agreement because of its indefinite duration (a condition that ordinarily permits a party to cancel a contract under French law).  SNCM appealed the decision to the French Supreme Court, which dismissed SNCM’s claim in November 2007.experts. The case is now closed.  SNCM will maintain its current stake in CMN.  

On September 19, 2006, CMN and Corsica Ferries filed a complaint before the Competition Council alleging anti-competitive practices by SNCM, the Corsican Regional Authority (Collectivité Territoriale Corse) and the Corsican Transportation Bureau (l’Office des Transports Corse) intended to restrict or eliminate competition during the call for tenders for the Marseille-Corsica public transport delegation contract. In December 2006, the Competition Councilcourt also held that the cartel claim against the Corsican Regional Authority, the Corsican Transportation Bureau and SNCM was inadmissible, and rejected claims regarding the excessive subsidies and crossed subsidies raised by Corsica Ferries. On the other hand, the Competition Council found that the global and indivisible offertortious liability of the SNCM likely constituted an abuse of its dominant position. The caseLyon met ropolitan authority would be reduced by 50% on the merits is pending, although it relates to a call for tendersgrounds that was cancelled by a decisionDalkia France could not have been unaware of the Conseil d’Etat in December 2006.

In February 2007, notwithstanding the dispute among the CMN shareholders, SNCM submitted a joint bid with CMN for five ferry routes between Marseille and Corsica.   The joint bid was contested by Corsica Ferries, a competitor, before a French administrative court and the French Competition Council.  

Before the Competition Council, Corsica Ferries contended that the CMN – SNCM grouping forms an anti-competitive cartel based on an unlawful pooling arrangement, and that the size of the subsidy requested by the grouping from the Corsican Regional Authority suggested an abuse of a dominant position. The Competition Council dismissed Corsica Ferries’ claims concerning pooling arrangements in April 2007.  Proceedings with respect to the claim of excessive subsidy are underway, but the Competition Council’s investigation has been suspended pending a decision on the merits.  As of the date of this annual report, it is impossible to determine what the outcome of this matter before the Competition Council might be.  

The initial bid process was delayed by administrative court proceedings, ending in a decision by the Conseil d’Etat (the highest French administrative court) in December 2006.  Following this decision, the Corsican Regional Authority launched a second bid process.  Corsica Ferries contested this process in a summary proceeding, but its position was rejected by a decision of the Conseil d’Etat in June 2007.  The contract was subsequently awarded to the CMN / SNCM group, and service began on July 1, 2007.  In January 2008, the administrative court of Bastia dismissed Corsica Ferries’ request for the cancellation of the decision of the Corsican Regional Authority to launch a new bid process.  Corsica Ferry has not appealed this decision.



142



Back to Contents


Proactiva

On September 22, 1999 and February 10, 2000, several lawsuits were filedirregularities in the Commonwealth Court in Arecibo, Puerto Rico (transferred to San Juan, as ordered bycompetitive bid procedure.

At this point, the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico) against, among others, CompañíCompany considers that these disputes should not have a de Aguas de Puerto Rico (CAPR). CAPR was a subsidiary of Aqua Alliance until 2000, when it was transferred to Proactiva, our joint venture with FCC. The complaints allege that CAPR operated (until June 2002) a wastewater treatment facility in Barceloneta, Puerto Rico, which emitted offensive odors and hazardous substances into the environment, damaging the health of the plaintiffs, a group of local residents.  Following several hearings and procedural steps in the context of a mediation process under the authority of a judge appointed by the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, the parties reached an amicable agreementsignificant impact on August 15, 2007. This settlement agreement provi des that certain defendants, other than CAPR, will pay the plaintiffs in consideration for the complete release of their legal claims, and subject to the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico’s resolution of certain procedural details. Accordingly, the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico issued a provisional order on August 30, 2007, and on November 6, 2007 it issued a decision formally acknowledging the August 2007 settlement agreement. Further to this formal acknowledgement, all claims against CAPR were dropped without CAPR having paid any amounts to the plaintiffsits financial position or the defendants.results.

Dividend Policy

Our company’sCompany’s dividend policy is determined by our boardBoard of directors,Directors, which may consider a number of factors, including our financial performance and net income, as well as the dividends paid by other French and international companies in the same sector. We cannot guarantee the amount of dividends that may be paid in respect of any fiscal year. However, we have announced and confirmed that our objective is



175



Back to maintain our policy of distributing dividends of between 50 and 60% of adjusted net income attributable to equity holders of the parent.Contents


SIGNIFICANT CHANGES

The following discussioninformation should be read in conjunction with our discussion of the evolution of our business, our financial condition, our results of operations and a comparison of our operating results and financial condition in preceding periods included in “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.” It contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those described under “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors.” Our results may differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements.

Since the date of our consolidated financial statements, we have pursued our strategic goals to increase organic growth, obtain new contracts and enter into new partnerships and alliances.  The following are the most significant developments in our businesses since December 31, 2007.  

General

On February 5, 2008, we published our consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2007 (unaudited IFRS figures), which amounted to €32,628.2 million. We also submitted our quarterly financial information as at December 31, 2007 to the AMF and released it to the public.Veolia Environnement

On March 24, 2010, the Company published press releases relating to changes to its Board of Directors that will be proposed at the general shareholders�� meeting to be held on May 7, 2008, we published2010. The Board of Directors decided to seek approval for the appointment of the following new Directors: Antoine Frérot, Chief Executive Officer of Veolia Environnement, and Groupe Industriel Marcel Dassault (GIMD) as represented by its Deputy Managing Director, Olivier Costa de Beauregard. It will further be proposed to add a press release regarding our annual results“censeur” (non-voting Board Member), which position shall be filled by Thierry Dassault. GIMD is proposed to be a director as a legal entity, which is possible under French corporate law.

Veolia Environnement welcomes GIMD as a shareholder, which strengthens the Company’s long-term shareholder base and constitutes a responsible and involved commitment to support the Company in the implementation of it strategy. At its meeting held on March 24, 2010, the Board of Directors noted GIMD’s undertaking to maintain its shareholding stake at 5% of the stock and voting rights of Veolia Environnement for 2007.a five year period. As a consequence, it decided to seek approval at the general shareholders’ meeting for the appointment of GIMD as Director and of acenseuramong the candidates proposed by GIMD. It was further decided to appoint GIMD as a member of the Nominations and Compensation Committee and the Accounts and Audit Committee of Veolia Environnement, subject to its appointment as a Director of the Company at the general shareholders’ meeting. GI MD’s undertaking to maintain its stake in Veolia Environnement will end if it ceases to hold the corporate governance roles detailed above.

The Board of Directors will further propose at the general shareholders’ meeting to be held on May 7, 2010 to renew Daniel Bouton, Jean-François Dehecq, Paul-Louis Girardot, Serge Michel and Georges Ralli in their term of office as Directors, in addition to the appointment of Antoine Frérot, Chief Executive Officer of the Company. At the same meeting, it will also be seeking the ratification of the appointment of Esther Koplowitz, appointed by the Board on January 1, 2010 to replace Murray Stuart. Finally, Henri Proglio has informed the Board of his intention to retire from his position as Chairman of the Board by the end of 2010.

On February 12, 2008, weMarch 24, 2010, Veolia Environnment announced that it had received notices of proposed adjustments (NOPAs) from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) relating to a number of tax positions relating to its U.S. subsidiaries, including primarily tax losses resulting from the reorganization of the former US Filter. See Note 42 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 18 of this annual report on Form 20-F for further details.

On April 16, 2010, Veolia Environnement and the Qatari Diar fund announced the launchsignature of an agreement aiming to set up a long-term strategic partnership, including the “Veolia Observatoryacquisition by Qatari Diar of Urban Lifestyles”. Having workeda 5% stake in Veolia Environnement’s capital with various cities for over 150 years, we are ablefull voting rights. The acquisition of this stake in Veolia Environnement’s capital reflects the two groups’ mutual ambition to anticipatework together on infrastructure and utilities projects in the complexity of urban problemsMiddle East and their interrelation so asNorth Africa. In the longer term, the partnership could also be extended to offer essential servicesthose countries in which the Qatari Diar fund has developed its presence. In addition, this agreement stipulates that improve the quality of urban life. By 2030, 60% of the world populationcompany Qatari Diar will be living in cities. We created the “Veolia Observatory of Urban Lifestyles”appointed to enhance our knowledge of city life. The Observatory published the findings ofVeolia Environnement’s board, subject to approval at Veolia Environnement’s Annual Shareholders Meeting on 7th May, 2010. Qatari Diar has indicated to Veolia Environnement tha t it will hold its first study, which was carried out by Ipsos, the French market research institute, between Septemberstake and December 2007. The study examines the relationship between city dwellers and the place where they live. A total of 8,500 people were surveyed in 14 cities around the world. The detailed findings of this survey can be found in a brochure published by the “Veolia Observatory o f Urban Lifestyles”. The survey will be carried out again in 2009 using a new group of major cities around the world.

On May 6, 2008, we published a press release regarding our 2008 first quarter revenue.



143



Back to Contentsits voting rights for three years.


Veolia Eau

On February 11,3, 2010, the protocol signed with Lyonnaise des Eaux on December 19, 2008 was amended to organize the redistribution of the joint subsidiaries of Veolia Eau-CGE and Lyonnaise des Eaux France. As a result, Veolia Eau announced that it had won, viaincreased its subsidiary Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies, a contract in a consortium including Warbud,control of the Polish civil engineering company,Société des Eaux de Marseille and WTE,of the German water company,Société des Eaux d’Arles. The redistribution of the joint subsidiaries was completed on March 22, 2010. In 2009, the entities redistributed to upgradeLyonnaise des Eaux contributed €150 million to the revenue of the Group, and extend the Czajka wastewater treatment plant in Warsaw, Poland. The contract will provide estimated total cumulative revenues of €500 million for the consortium, of which approximately €148 million will goentities redistributed to Veolia Eau. This contract is part of a larger development project in the countries in Eastern Europe, which have a significant needEau contributed €136 million.



176



Back to renew their purification infrastructures. This contract will allow Veolia Water, which already has a strong presence in this part of Europe, and particularly in the Czech Republic, Romania, Hungary and Slovakia, to reinforce its presence in Poland.Contents

On April 29, 2008, Veolia Eau announced that it won, through its subsidiary Veolia Water AMI, a six-year contract awarded by Saudi Arabia’s Ministry of Water and Electricity for water production and distribution and wastewater collection in the capital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. This is the first time Saudi Arabia awards a contract for water services to a private operator, and it is also one of the most important contracts in terms of the number of people served (4.5 million inhabitants) and in the length of the drinking water network (10,000 kilometers), as well as wastewater (4,500 kilometers) that has been entrusted to Veolia Eau. The contract represents estimated aggregate revenues of €40 million.

Veolia Propreté

The acquisitionoperating contract for the Miami-Dade waste-to-energy plant was transferred in February 2010 to Covanta Holding Corporation, completing the sale of Bartin Recycling Group, the third company in France for recycling and reuse of scrap iron and metals, which generated €249 million revenues in 2006, was finalized on February 13, 2008. This acquisition will increase Veolia Propreté’s metal recycling capacityportfolio of North American waste-to-energy contracts announced in France from 250,000 to more than one million tons per year, which is a significant gain considering that 50% of steel worldwide is produced from scrap iron.July 2009 and encompassing management and maintenance contracts for seven sites.

In February 2008,2010, following a call for tenders, Veolia Propreté entered into a signifcant twenty five-year Private Finance Initiative agreement in Southwark County, U.K. The agreement represents estimated global revenues of €900 million, thanks to a global integrated management strategy which proposes the reduction, collection, reception, transfer,renewed its recycling composting, pretreatment and disposal of waste.

On March 17, 2008, the district authorities of West Berkshire awarded to Veolia Propreté a Private Finance Initiative contract for integrated waste management contract with the City of Westminster in London. This seven-year contract will commence in September 2010 and includes an extension option for a twenty-five year term, representing total aggregatefurther seven years. It is expected to generate estimated revenuescumulative revenue over seven years of €667approximately €298 million.  The contract covers the collection, recycling and elimination of waste from the district as well as urban cleaning services.  Veolia Propreté will build and manage the installations for the upgrade, transfer, composting and recycling of household waste.

Dalkia

On February 18, 2008,In line with its development strategy focusing on the biomass sector in France, Dalkia announcedwas selected at the successend of January 2010 for seven projects for combined heating and electrical power plants fired by biomass (CR3).

As part of the public tender offer launchedstrategic repositioning of Dalkia in the Czech republic, Dalkia signed an agreement on December 17, 2007January 5, 2010 for the Polish company Praterm.  Dalkia is now the majority shareholderacquisition of the company, holding 97.9% of itsentire share capital for an investment of €142 million.  With more than 260 kmEnergy.As, which manages the industrial utilities of small and medium sized networks, Pratermthe OKD mining group. This transaction is present in 21 cities incurrently awaiting approval by the North, South, and Southeast of Poland.  It produces and distributes heat to nearly 520,000 inhabitants and is expected to generate revenue of approximately €55 million in 2008.antitrust authorities.

Veolia Transport

In January 2008, the urbanFrench overseas departments and suburban bus transportation agreementterritories, the Tram’Tiss consortium, composed of the Colas, Bouygues and Veolia Transport groups and various financial partners, was awarded the contract for the financing, construction and operation of the future Reunion Island tram-train. The partnership contract was signed in Las Vegas was renewedDecember 2009 for a two-year term. This agreement,period of forty-five years. The planned forty kilometer line will link the operation of which will begin in April 2008, represents cumulative estimated revenues of approximately €137 million. The renewalEast side of the Boston agreement in 2007 andgreater Saint-Denis area to Saint-Paul, for a total estimated cost of €1.5 billion. The entry into effect of the Las Vegas agreement in 2008 constitute major successes for contract is contingent on the presentation by the local authority of its forward-looking financial analyses, integrating any additional resources from the French State.

Veolia Transport, these two agreements beingEnvironnement is still carrying on discussions regarding the most significant in Northern America in their respective markets in termscombination of revenues.

Since January 2008, Veolia Transport Sweden has held two thirds of the share capital of the company Tagia, the manager of the Stockholm metro.  This company, the remaining capital of which isits Transportation Division with Transdev, owned by Storstockholms Lokaltrafik AB (SL), the company overseeingCaisse des Dépôts et Consignations and by the public transport system in the Stockholm region, generated revenues of approximately €75 million in 2007.

On February 20, 2008, Veolia Cargo, a subsidiary of Veolia Transport specialized in railway logistics, announced the execution of an agreement relating to the acquisition of Rail4Chem, a German railway company specialized in international railway freight transport.  Rail4Chem generated revenues in 2007 of more than €80 million.  This acquisition will be finalized during 2008, subject to the approval of the competition authorities.RATP.



144177



Back to Contents


ITEM 9: 9.

THE OFFER AND LISTING

TRADING MARKETS

Our ordinary shares are listed on Euronext Paris market (Compartment A) under the symbol “VIE”. Since August 8, 2001, our shares have been included in the CAC 40, the main index published by Euronext Paris. OurThis index contains 40 stocks selected among the top 100 companies based on free-float capitalization and the most active stocks listed on the Euronext Paris Market. The CAC 40 Index indicates trends on the French stock market as a whole and is one of the most widely followed stock price indices in France. Since October 5, 2001, our shares have also been listed on the New York Stock Exchange in the form of American Depositary Shares (“ADSs”) since October 5, 2001.under the symbol “VE”. Each ADS represents one ordinary share.

The Euronext Paris market

In February 2005, Euronext Paris overhauled its listing structure by implementing the Eurolist market, a new single regulated market, which replaced the regulated markets formerly operated by Euronext Paris,i.e., the Bourse de Paris (which comprised thePremier Marché and theSecond Marché) and theNouveau Marché. As part of this process, Euronext Paris transferred on February 21, 2005 all shares and bonds listed on thePremier Marché,Second Marché andNouveau Marché onto the Eurolist market.

As from February 21, 2005, all securities approved for listing by Euronext Paris are traded on the Eurolist market, which was renamed the Euronext Paris market on November 28, 2007. The Euronext Paris market is a regulated market operated and managed by Euronext Paris, a market operator (entreprise de marché) responsible for the admission of securities and the supervision of trading in listed securities. Euronext Paris publishes a daily official price list that includes price information on listed securities. Securities listed on the Euronext Paris market are classified by alphabetical order. In addition, Euronext Paris created the following compartments for classification purposes: Compartment A, for issuers whose market capitalization is over €1 billion, Compartment B, for issuers whose market capitalization is between €150 million and €1 billion, and Compartment C, for issuers whose market capitalization is under €150 million.

Trading on the Euronext Paris market

Securities listedadmitted to trading on the Euronext Paris market are officially traded through authorized financial institutions that are members of Euronext Paris. Euronext Paris places securities listedadmitted to trading on the Euronext Paris market in one of two categories (continuous trading and auction trading), depending on their inclusion in certain indices or compartments and/or on their historical or expected trading volume. Our shares trade in the continuous category, known as “Continuous,” which includes the most actively traded securities. Securities in the “Continuous” categoryShares are traded on each trading day from 9:00 a.m. to 5:2530 p.m. (Paris time), with a pre-opening session from 7:15 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and a post-closing session from 5:2530 p.m. to 5:3035 p.m. (during which timespre-opening and post-closing sessions trades are recorded but not executed until respectively, the opening auction at 9:00 a.m. and the closing auction at 5:3035 p.m.), re spectively). In addition, from 5:3035 p.m. to 5:40 p.m., trading can take place at the closing auction price. Trading in a security aftercontinuous category shares between 5:40 p.m. untiland the beginning of the pre-opening session of the following trading day may take place at a price that must be within the last auction pricea range of plus or minus 1%. the previous day’s closing auction price.

In December 2008, Euronext Paris has introduced continuous electronicbegan migration to a new trading during trading hours for most listed securities.

platform. This resulted in the replacement of the current Euronext Paris automatically restrictsplatform, the Nouveau Système de Cotation (NSC) platform, with a new platform called the Universal Trading Platform (UTP). Products such as our shares migrated to the new platform in February 2009. Until completion of such migration, trading in our shares was subject to the NSC trading rules. Thereafter, UTP trading rules became applicable.

Under the UTP trading manual, Euronext paris may temporarily interrupt trading in a security listedadmitted to trading on the Euronext Paris market if matching a bid or ask offer recorded in the “Continuous” category upon entry of an order in the order book that is likely tosystem would inevitably result in a trade being executed atprice beyond a certain threshold, determined on the basis of a percentage fluctuation above or below a set reference price. With respect to equity securities included in the CAC 40 index and trading in the continuous category, once trading has commenced, volatility interruptions for a reservation period of 2 minutes (subject to extension by Euronext Paris) are possible if the price exceeding the specific price limits defined by its regulations. In particular, trading is automatically restricted in a security whose quoted price variesfluctuates by more than 10.0% from3% above or below the last price determined in an auction or by more than 2.0% from the last tradedrelevant reference price. Trading of this security resumes after a call phase of four minutes, during which orders are entered in the central order book but not executed, which ends by an auction. Euronext Paris may also suspend trading of a security listedadmitted to trading on the Euronext Paris market in certain other limited circumstances, (suspension de la cotation),including at the request of the issuer or the occurrence of unusual trading activity in particular to prevent or halt disorderly market conditions.a security. In addition, in exceptional cases, including, for example, in the contextupon announcement of a takeover bid, the French market regulator (Autorité des marchés financiers or “AMF”) may also require Euronext Paris may alsoto suspend trading of the security concerned, upon request of the AMF.

Trades ofin securities listedadmitted to trading on the Euronext Paris market are settled on a cash basis on the third day following the trade. MarketFor certain liquid securities, market intermediaries are also permitted to offer investors the opportunity to place orders through a deferred settlement service (serviceOrdres Stipulés à règlement difféRèglement-LivraisonDiffés — OSRD)) for a fee. The deferred settlement service is only available for trades in securities that have both a total market capitalization of at least €1 billion and a daily average volume of trades of at least €1 million. Investors can elect on or before the determination date (jour de liquidation), which is the fifth trading day before the end of the month, either to settle by the last trading day of the month or to pay an additional fee and postpone the settlement decision to thet he determination date of the following month. OurAt the date of this annual report, our shares are currently eligible for the deferred settlement service.



145



Back to Contents


Equity securities traded on a deferred settlement basis are considered to have been transferred only after they have been registeredrecorded in the purchaser’s account. Under French securities regulations, any sale of a security traded on a deferred settlement basis during the month of a dividend payment is deemed to occur after the dividend has been paid. Ifif the sale takes place before, but during the month of, a dividend payment date, the purchaser’s account will be credited with an amount equal to the dividend paid and the seller’s account will be debited by the same amount.



178



Back to Contents


Prior to any transfer of securities listed on the Euronext Paris market and held in registered form, the securities must be converted into bearer form and accordingly recorded in an account maintained by an accredited intermediary with Euroclear France S.A., a registered central security depositary. Transactions in securities are initiated by the owner giving the instruction (through an agent, if appropriate) to the relevant accredited intermediary. Trades of securities listed on the Euronext Paris market are cleared through LCH.Clearnet and settled through Euroclear France using a continuous net settlement system. A fee or commission is payable to the accredited intermediary or other agent involved in the transaction.

Trading by Veolia Environnement in its Shares

Under French law, a company may not issue shares to itself, but it may purchase its own shares in the limited cases described in “Item 10. Additional Information — Memorandum and Articles of Association — Trading in Our Own Shares.”

Trading History

Trading On Euronext Paris

The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the reported high and low sales prices (in euro) and the trading volume (in shares) of our shares on the Euronext Paris market.

High

Low

Trading
Volume(1)

High

Low

Trading Volume

————

————

————

————

——————

  

2008

  

2010

   

First Quarter

63.89

42.00

183,500,344

26.20

22.81

144,093,238

March

58.29

42.00

85,760,030

26.20

23.32

63,981,898

February

59.84

53.29

41,083,180

24.98

22.81

36,702,154

January

63.89

48.81

56,657,134

25.90

23.16

43,409,186

2007

  

2009

   

Fourth Quarter

66.25

59.19

114,698,053

26.67

21.65

117,606,999

December

65.85

60.07

35,155,979

23.30

21.94

30,981,155

November

66.25

59.88

47,353,819

23.50

21.65

35,554,795

October

62.95

59.19

32,188,255

26.67

22.02

51,071,049

Third Quarter

27.10

20.01

115,250,414

Second Quarter

23.15

15.37

132,076,948

First Quarter

23.09

15.00

153,007,114

2008

   

Fourth Quarter

29.86

16.55

204,040,593

December

22.48

17.11

40,369,311

November

20.98

17.36

57,657,493

October

29.86

16.55

106,013,789

Third Quarter

37.94

28.00

153,059,989

Second Quarter

47.90

34.70

184,364.200

First Quarter

63.89

42.00

183,500,344

2007

   

Fourth Quarter

66.25

59.19

114,698,053

Third Quarter

60.96

50.62

141,437,296

60.96

50.62

141,437,296

Second Quarter

63.09

55.30

135,372,389

63.09

55.30

135,372,389

First Quarter

57.10

50.60

99,535,891

57.10

50.60

99,535,891

2006

     

Fourth Quarter

58.40

46.12

97,560,487

58.40

46.12

97,560,487

Third Quarter

48.69

42.71

119,763,237

48.69

42.71

119,763,237

Second Quarter

49.45

36.49

150,220,240

49.45

36.49

150,220,240

First Quarter

46.40

37.82

97,080,563

46.40

37.82

97,080,563

2005

     

Fourth Quarter

39.14

33.80

98,720,710

39.14

33.80

98,720,710

Third Quarter

35.40

29.56

102,226,960

35.40

29.56

102,226,960

Second Quarter

31.82

27.17

110,251,403

31.82

27.17

110,251,403

First Quarter

28.42

25.21

122,493,492

28.42

25.21

122,493,492

2004

  

Fourth Quarter

26.63

23.11

107,660,963

Third Quarter

23.54

21.02

83,118,617

Second Quarter

23.69

21.06

94,359,760

First Quarter

24.56

21.30

96,749,828

2003

  

Fourth Quarter

21.78

18.08

109,232,584

Third Quarter

19.79

16.00

99,705,921

Second Quarter

20.28

14.58

119,016,453

First Quarter

24.93

14.40

93,519,693

Source: Euronext Paris

(1)

Regarding trading volume, a new definition was adopted by Euronext Paris in May 2003 in order to harmonize practices across Euronext’s various local trading markets. For Euronext data provided before this date, trading volume included transactions conducted in the over-the-counter market. Since May 2003, market trading activity as defined by Euronext Paris includes transactions conducted on the NSC system, regulated off-market transactions and transactions involving option trading on Monep, but does not include transactions conducted in the over-the-counter market. Trading volumes after May 2003 may therefore be lower than those recorded under Euronext Paris’ former definition of market trading activity.

Source: Euronext Paris

Source: Euronext Paris




146179



Back to Contents


Trading On The New York Stock Exchange

The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the reported high and low sales prices (in U.S. dollars) and the trading volume (in ADSs) of our ADSs on the New York Stock Exchange.

High

Low

Trading
Volume(1)

High

Low

Trading Volume(1)

————

————

————

————

———————

   

2008

   

2010

  

First Quarter

94.42

64.85

12,454,400

37.15

31.30

4,337,228

March

86.98

64.85

6,087,300

35.143

31.70

1,602,522

February

90.27

77.56

2,919,100

34.88

31.30

1,295,234

January

94.42

72.88

3,448,000

37.15

32.75

1,439,472

2007

   

2009

  

Fourth Quarter

96.61

84.25

5,382,300

38.53

31.50

4,898,227

December

96.61

86.15

1,553,200

34.63

31.50

1,989,622

November

96.07

88.15

1,996,700

35.00

31.88

1,126,868

October

91.02

84.25

1,832,400

38.53

32.28

1,781,737

Third Quarter

40.00

27.72

6,288,772

Second Quarter

31.51

27.07

9,200,208

First Quarter

31.83

19.14

12,239,309

2008

  

Fourth Quarter

41.50

20.83

16,805,689

Third Quarter

56.09

39.10

10,256,268

Second Quarter

74.08

54.16

12,758,488

First Quarter

94.42

64.85

12,454,400

2007

  

Fourth Quarter

96.61

84.25

5,382,300

Third Quarter

86.64

67.11

6,771,700

86.64

67.11

6,771,700

Second Quarter

86.14

74.88

4,336,700

86.14

74.88

4,336,700

First Quarter

74.91

67.00

4,014,770

74.91

67.00

4,014,770

2006

     

Fourth Quarter

75.87

58.00

3,134,600

75.87

58.00

3,134,600

Third Quarter

61.61

48.80

4,751,000

61.61

48.80

4,751,000

Second Quarter

62.70

46.14

4,357,400

62.70

46.14

4,357,400

First Quarter

56.40

46.15

2,069,500

56.40

46.15

2,069,500

2005

     

Fourth Quarter

46.43

40.70

982,900

46.43

40.70

982,900

Third Quarter

43.45

35.75

729,500

43.45

35.75

729,500

Second Quarter

39.65

35.24

1,340,600

39.65

35.24

1,340,600

First Quarter

36.46

33.07

682,700

36.46

33.07

682,700

2004

   

Fourth Quarter

36.45

28.95

584,100

Third Quarter

29.07

25.65

219,500

Second Quarter

28.77

25.05

559,400

First Quarter

31.25

26.79

873,900

2003

   

Fourth Quarter

27.45

20.65

984,697

Third Quarter

23.19

18.30

1,070,478

Second Quarter

23.42

16.00

352,079

First Quarter

26.08

16.04

660,990

Source: Bank of New York and New York Stock Exchange

(1)

Regarding trading volume, since September 2006, we have relied on data published by the New York Stock Exchange (accessible on the New York Stock Exchange’s website (www.nyse.com)). Prior to September 2006, we relied on data published by the Bank of New York, which included off-market transactions. As a result, the trading volume data set forth in the table above may vary slightly depending on the source.

Source: Bank of New York and New York Stock Exchange

(1)

Regarding trading volume, since September 2006, we have relied on data published by the New York Stock Exchange (accessible on the New York Stock Exchange’s website (www.nyse.com)). Prior to September 2006, we relied on data published by the Bank of New York, which included off-market transactions. As a result, the trading volume data set forth in the table above may vary slightly depending on the source.

Source: Bank of New York and New York Stock Exchange

(1)

Regarding trading volume, since September 2006, we have relied on data published by the New York Stock Exchange (accessible on the New York Stock Exchange’s website (www.nyse.com)). Prior to September 2006, we relied on data published by the Bank of New York, which included off-market transactions. As a result, the trading volume data set forth in the table above may vary slightly depending on the source.




147180



Back to Contents


ITEM 10: 10.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION

Objects and Purposes

Under our Article 3 of ourstatuts, our corporate purpose, directly or indirectly, in France and in all other countries, is:

the conduct of service activities relating to the environment on behalf of private, professional or public customers, specifically in the areas of water, wastewater treatment, energy, transportation and environmental services;

the acquisition and exercise of all patents, licenses, trademarks and designs relating directly or indirectly to our operations;

the acquisition of interests (whether in the form of shares, bonds or other securities) in existing or future companies, through subscription, purchase, contribution, exchange or any other means, together with the ability to subsequently transfer such interests; and

generally, the entering into of all commercial, industrial, financial, real estate or other transactions relating directly or indirectly to the above-mentioned corporate purposes, and, in particular, the ability to issue any guarantee, first-demand guarantee, surety or other security in favor of any group, undertaking or company in which we hold an interest in connection with our activities, as well as the ability to finance or refinance any of our activities.

Directors

Ourstatuts provide that each of our directors must own at least 750 of our shares in registered form. The French commercial code provides that each director is eligible for reappointment upon the expiration of his or her term of office. Ourstatuts provide that the Board members stand up for reelection on a rolling basis for a maximum term of four years. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Board of Directors—Composition and Appointment.”

Under the French commercial code, any transaction directly or indirectly between a company and a member of its boardBoard of directorsDirectors that is not made under normal conditions within the ordinary course of business of the company is subject to the prior consent of the disinterested members of the boardBoard of directors.Directors. Any such transaction concluded without such prior consent can be nullified if it causes prejudice to the company. The interested director can be held liable on this basis. The statutory auditor must be informed of the transaction within one month following its conclusion and must prepare a report to be submitted to the shareholders for approval at their next meeting. At the shareholders’ meeting, the interested director may not vote on the resolution approving the transaction, nor may his or her shares be taken into account in determining the outcome of the vote or whetherwheth er a quorum i sis present. In the event the transaction is not ratified by the shareholders at a shareholders’ meeting, it will remain enforceable by third parties against the company, but the company may in turn hold the interested director and, in some circumstances, other members of the boardBoard of directors,Directors, liable for any damages it may suffer as a result. In addition, the transaction may be cancelled if it is fraudulent. In the case of significant transactions with directors that can be considered made under normal conditions and within the company’s ordinary course of business, the interested director must provide a copy of the governing agreement to the chairmanChairman of the boardBoard of directors,Directors, who must provide a list of such agreements and their purposes to the members of the board and the statutory auditor. Moreover, certain transactions between a corporation and one of its directors who is a natural person are prohibited under the French commercial code: in particular, French law prohibits loans fromfro m a company to its directors.

Fees and other compensation paid to our directors are determined by the general shareholders’ meetings. The boardBoard of directorsDirectors may allocate the total sum authorized by the general shareholders’ meeting among its members at its discretion.discretion by a simple majority vote. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Board of Directors.” In addition, the boardBoard of directorsDirectors may allocate exceptional compensation to directors on a case-by-case basis for specific assignments.

Under ourstatuts, after each annual shareholders’ meeting, the number of directors aged 70 or older may not exceed one-third of the total number of directors.



181



Back to Contents


Transactions with Major Shareholders

The limitations imposed by the French commercial code on transactions between a company and interested directors, described in the preceding paragraph, also apply to transactions between a company and a holder of shares carrying 10% or more of its voting power (or, if such shareholder is a legal entity, the entity’s parent, if any) and to transactions between companies with common directors or executive officers.



148



Back to Contents


Rights, Preferences and Restrictions Applicable to Our Ordinary Shares

Dividends

Dividends on our shares are distributed to shareholderspro rata. The dividend payment date is decided by the shareholders at an ordinary general meeting. Under the French commercial code, we must pay any dividends within nine months of the end of our fiscal year unless otherwise authorized by court order. Subject to certain conditions, our boardBoard of directorsDirectors can determine the distribution of interim dividends during the course of the fiscal year, but in any case before the approval of the annual financial statements by the annual ordinary general meeting of shareholders. Dividends on our shares that are not claimed within five years of the date of declared payment revert to the French State.

Voting Rights

Each of our shares not held by our Company carries the right to cast one vote in our shareholders’ meetings.

Liquidation Rights

If our companyCompany is liquidated, any assets remaining after payment of our debts, liquidation expenses and all of our remaining obligations will be distributed first to repay in full the nominal value of our shares. Any surplus will be distributedpro rata among shareholders in proportion to the nominal value of their shareholdings.

Preferential Subscription Rights

Under the French commercial code, if we issue additional shares, or any equity securities or other specific kinds of additional securities carrying a right, directly or indirectly, to purchase equity securities issued by our companyCompany for cash or cash equivalents, current shareholders will have preferential subscription rights to these securities on a pro rata basis. These preferential rights will require us to give priority treatment to those shareholders over other persons wishing to subscribe for the securities. The rights entitle the individual or entity that holds them to subscribe to an issue of any securities that may increase our share capital by means of a cash payment or a set-off of cash debts. Preferential subscription rights are transferable during the subscription period relating to a particular offering. These rights may also be listed on Euronext Paris. A two-thirdstwo-th irds majority of our shares entitled to vote at an extraordinary general meeting may vote to waive preferential subscription rights with respect to any particular offering. French law requires a company’s governing board and independent auditors to present reports that specifically address any proposal to waive preferential subscription rights. In the event of a waiver, the issue of securities must be completed within the period prescribed by law. The shareholders may also decide at an extraordinary general meeting to give the existing shareholders a non-transferable priority right to subscribe for the new securities during a limited period of time. Shareholders may also waive their own preferential subscription rights with respect to any particular offering.

Limitation on Exercise of Rights

Ourstatutsand French law provide that any time it is necessary to own several shares in order to exercise a specific right or to meet the requirements of a transaction affecting our share capital or equity, a shareholder that holds a number of our shares that is lower than the required number may only exercise this right or participate in this transaction if it obtains the required number of shares.



182



Back to Contents


Amendments to Rights of Holders

Under French law, a two-thirds majority vote at the extraordinary shareholders’ meeting is required to change ourstatuts, which set out the rights attaching to our shares except for capital increases through incorporation of reserves, profits or share premium, or through the issuance of free share warrants in the event of a public offering on our shares (article L. 233-32 of the French Commercial Code).

Rights of a given class of shareholders can be amended only by action of an extraordinary generalspecial meeting of the class of shareholders affected. Two-thirds of the shares of the affected class voting either in person or by mail or proxy must approve any proposal to amend shareholder rights. The quorum requirements for a special meeting are one third of the voting shares of the affected class, or one fifth upon resumption of an adjourned meeting. There is only one class of shares of our Company.

Ordinary and Extraordinary Meetings

In accordance with the French commercial code, there are two types of general shareholders’ meetings: ordinary and extraordinary.



149



Back to Contents


Ordinary general meetings of shareholders are required for matters that are not specifically reserved by law to extraordinary general meetings, such as:

approval ofapproving our company’sCompany’s consolidated and unconsolidated annual financial statements;

electing, replacing and removing members of the boardBoard of directors;Directors;

appointing statutory auditors; and

declaring dividends or authorizing dividends to be paid in shares.shares; and

approving our share repurchase programs.

Extraordinary general meetings of shareholders are required for approval of matters such as amendments to ourstatuts, including any amendment required in connection with extraordinary corporate actions. Extraordinary corporate actions include:

changing our company’sCompany’s name or corporate purpose;

increasing or decreasing our share capital;

creating a new class of equity securities;

authorizing the issuance of investment certificates or convertible or exchangeable securities;

establishing any other rights to equity securities;

selling or transferring substantially all of our assets; and

the voluntary liquidation of our company.Company.



183



Back to Contents


Convening Shareholders’ Meetings

The French commercial code requires our boardBoard of directorsDirectors to convene an annual ordinary general meeting of shareholders to approve our annual financial statements. This meeting must be held within six months of the end of each fiscal year. This period may be extended by an order of the President of the French commercial court (Tribunal de Commerce). The boardBoard of directorsDirectors may also convene an ordinary or extraordinary meeting of shareholders upon proper notice at any time during the year. If the boardBoard of directorsDirectors fails to convene a shareholders’ meeting, any of the following may call the meeting:

our statutory auditors

a court-appointed agent, as requested by any of (i) one or several shareholders holding at least 5% of our share capital; (ii) in cases of urgency, designated employee representatives or any interested party; or (iii) duly qualified associations of shareholders who have held their shares in registered form for at least two years and who together hold at least 1% of the voting rights of our company;Company;

in a bankruptcy, our liquidator or court-appointed agent in certain instances; or

shareholders holding more than 50% of our share capital or voting rights after a public offer or a sale of a controlling stake of our capital.

Notice of Shareholders’ Meetings

We must announce general meetings at least 35 days in advance (or 15 days in case of a public offer for our shares) by means of a preliminary notice published in theBulletin des Annonces Légales Obligatoires (“BALO”). The preliminary noticenotice(“avis de réunion”) must first be sent to the AMF. The AMF also recommends that the preliminary notice be published in a newspaper of national circulation in France. The preliminary notice must disclose, among other things, the time, date, and placeagenda of the meeting, whether the meeting will be ordinary or extraordinary, the agenda, a draft of the resolutions to be submitted to the shareholders and a description of the procedures which holders of bearer shares must follow to attend the meeting, the procedure for voting by mail. The notice must contain a statement informing the shareholders that they may propose additional resolutions to the boardBoard of directors eit herDirectors either (i) twenty-fivetwenty- five days before the date of the meeting, or (ii) within twenty days of the publication of the notice (or 5 days in case of a public offer for our shares) when such notice was published more than 45 days before the date of the shareholders’ meeting.



150



Back to Contents


We must send a final notice (“avis de convocation”) containing the time date and place of the meeting, the nature of the meeting (ordinary/extraordinary), the agenda of the meeting and other information about the meeting at least 15 days (or six days in case of a public offer for our shares) prior to the meeting or at least six days (or four days in case of a public offer for our shares) prior to the resumption of any meeting adjourned for lack of a quorum. The final notice must be sent by mail to all registered shareholders who have held shares for more than one month prior to the date of the preliminary notice. The final notice must also be published in the BALO and in a newspaper authorized to publish legal announcements in the local administrative department in which our companyCompany is registered, with prior notice having been given to the AMF.

In general, shareholders can take action at shareholders’ meetings only on matters listed in the agenda for the meeting. One exception to this rule is that shareholders may take action with respect to the dismissal of members of the boardBoard of directorsDirectors regardless of whether these actions arethis action was on the agenda. Additional resolutions to be submitted for approval by the shareholders at the meeting may be proposed to the boardBoard of directorsDirectors after the publication of the preliminary notice in the BALO, as described above, by:

designated employee representatives;the works council;

one or several shareholders holding a specified percentage of shares;shares computed in accordance with the provisons of the French Commercial Code; or

a duly qualified association of shareholders who have held their shares in registered form for at least two years and who together hold at least 1% of our voting rights.

The boardBoard of directorsDirectors must submit properly proposed resolutions to a vote of the shareholders.

Any shareholder may submit written questions to the boardBoard of directorsDirectors relating to the agenda for the meeting at least fouruntil the fourth business daysday before the shareholder’s meeting. Such shareholder must also provide a certificate evidencing share ownership. The boardBoard of directorsDirectors must respond to these questions during the meeting.



184



Back to Contents


Attendance and Voting at Shareholders’ Meetings

Each share confers on the shareholder the right to cast one vote.vote (except that our Company may not vote the Treasury shares it hold). Shareholders may attend ordinary meetings and extraordinary meetings and exercise their voting rights subject to French law and the conditions specified in the French commercial code and ourstatuts. In particular, a holder must have accurately disclosed any substantial interest in our companyCompany (as described under “— Anti-Takeover Provisions — Disclosure of Substantial Shareholdings” and “— Anti-Takeover Effects of Applicable Law and Regulations”) and the holder’s shares must be fully paid up.. In addition, a shareholder is not permitted to vote on specific resolutions that would confer a particular benefit on that shareholder. There is no requirement that shareholders have a minimum number of shares in order to attend or to be represented at an ordinary or extraordinary general meeting.

The right to participate in general meetings is subjectAccess to the recordmeeting is open to such shareholders, as well as to their proxies and registered intermediaries who have provided evidence of the shares in the name of the shareholder or of the accredited intermediary registered on behalf of such shareholdertheir entitlement to attend at leastmidnight (Paris time) three business days prior tobefore the date of the meeting, at zero hours, Paris time,including a certification (attestation) that their shares are registered either in the shareholders’ register held by our company,or on behalf of the Company, or in thea bearer share account held by thean intermediary. The registration or record in the bearer share account held by the authorized intermediary is authenticated by aSuch certificate of participation issued by such authorized intermediary must be attached to the postal or proxy voting form or asbe part of an application for an admission card in the shareholder’s name or on behalf of the shareholder represented by the registered intermediary. A certificate is also issued to any shareholder who wishes to attend the meeting in person and has not received an admission card by the thir dthird business dayda y prior to the meeting, at zero hours,midnight, Paris time.

Proxies and Votes by Mail

In general, all shareholders who have properly recorded their shares, and / and/or duly presented a certificate from their accredited financial intermediary may participate in general meetings. Shareholders may participate in general meetings either in person or by proxy. Shareholders may vote in person, by proxy or by mail.

Proxies, for shareholders wishing to be represented by their spouse or another shareholder, will be sent to any shareholder on request.request received between the publication of final notice of meeting and three days before the general meeting. To be counted, such proxies must be received at our registered office, or at any other address indicated on the notice convening the meeting, prior to the date of the meeting. A shareholder may only grant proxieshis or her proxy to his or her spouse or to another shareholder. A shareholder that is a corporation may grant proxies to a legal representative. Alternatively, the shareholder may send us a blank proxy without nominating any representative. In this case, the chairmanChairman of the meeting will vote blank proxies in favor of all resolutions proposed by the boardBoard of directorsDirectors and against all others.

With respect to votes by mail, we are required to send shareholders a voting form. The completed form must be returned to us, in paper format or in electronic form, at least three days prior to the date of the shareholders’ meeting.



151



Back to Contents


Quorum

The French commercial code requires that shareholders having at least 20% of the shares entitled to voting rights must be present in person or be voting by mail or by proxy to fulfill the quorum requirement for:

an ordinary general meeting; or

an extraordinary general meeting where only the following resolutions are proposed: (i) an increase in our share capital through incorporation of reserves, profits or share premium, and/or (ii) an authorization to issue warrants with preferential rights to subscribe shares of the companyCompany during a takeover bid period.

The quorum requirement is 25% of the shares entitled to voting rights, on the same basis, for any other extraordinary general meeting.

If a quorum is not present at a meeting, the meeting is adjourned. However, only questions that were on the agenda of the adjourned meeting may be discussed and voted upon. When an adjourned meeting is resumed, there is no quorum requirement for an ordinary meeting or for an extraordinary general meeting where only the following resolutions are proposed: (i) an increase in our share capital through incorporation of reserves, profits or share premium, and/or (ii) an authorization to issue warrants with preferential rights to subscribe shares of the companyCompany during a takeover bid period. However, only questions that were on the agenda of the adjourned meeting may be discussed and voted upon. In the case of any other reconvened extraordinary general meeting, shareholders having at least 20% of outstanding voting rights must be present in person or be voting by mail or proxy for a quorum. If a quorum is not present at such reconvened meeting, the reconvened meeting may be adjourned for a maximummax imum of two months.months with the same quorum requirement. Any deliberation by the sha reholdersshareholders taking place without a quorum is void.



185



Back to Contents


In instances where we have given prior notice to shareholders that they may participate in a meeting through videoconference or through other means which permit their identification under applicable law, shareholders who so participate shall be counted for purposes of calculating whether a quorum (or a majority as discussed below) exists.

Majority

A simple majority of shareholders present or represented may pass any resolution on matters required to be considered at an ordinary general meeting, or at an extraordinary general meeting only concerning either or both of a capital increase by incorporation of reserves, profits or share premium and/or an authorization to issue warrants with preferential rights to subscribe shares of the companyCompany during a takeover bid period. At any other extraordinary general meeting, a two-thirds majority of the shareholder votes cast is required.

A unanimous shareholder vote is required to increase liabilities of shareholders.

Abstention from voting by those present or those represented by proxy or voting mail is counted as a vote against the resolution submitted to the shareholder vote.

In general, a shareholder is entitled to one vote per share at any general meeting. Under the French commercial code, shares of a company held by entities controlled directly or indirectly by that company are not entitled to voting rights and are not considered for quorum purposes.

Limitations on Right to Own Securities

As of the date of this annual report, ourstatuts do not contain any provisions that limit the right of shareholders to own our securities or hold or exercise voting rights associated with those securities. See “— Exchange Controls” for a description of certain requirements imposed by the French commercial code.

However, an amendment to ourstatuts will be proposed at our combined shareholders' meeting of May 7, 2008, pursuant to which as soon as a shareholder, whether alone or in concert, gains ownership of more than 20% of the capital or voting rights of our company, the number of votes available to that shareholder or its representative at our general shareholders' meetings in respect of the shares that it owns, directly or indirectly, shall not exceed 20% of the total voting rights of our company. This cap on voting rights shall cease to have effect and shall lapse as soon as the shareholder concerned crosses the ownership threshold of one-third of the share capital or total voting rights of our company. This amendment is designed to prevent creeping takeovers, which have a negative impact in particular on minority shareholders, who would be affected by a change in control of the company without the payment of a control premium. If adopted by the combined shareholders' meeting, this amendment shall have immediate effect.



152



Back to Contents


Trading in Our Own Shares

Under French law, our companyCompany may not issue shares to itself. However, we may, either directly or through a financial intermediary acting on our behalf, purchase shares representing up to 10% of our share capital. To acquire our own shares, we must obtain the approval of our shareholders at an ordinary general meeting. In addition, under French law, we are required to disclose through a publication on our website the transactions we carry out with respect to our shares within seven days after their occurrence. On a monthly basis, we must also provide the AMF with the details of the transactions we have carried out with respect to our shares during the preceding month.month, if not fully disclosed pursuant to the disclosure rules described in the preceding sentence.

At the general shareholders’ meeting held on May 10, 2007,7, 2009, our shareholders approved a share repurchase program that authorizes us to purchase, sell or transfer our shares at any time, except during a public tender offer, and by any means, including block trades and combinations of financial derivative instruments, subject to market regulations and the 10% limit provided by law. This program allows us to repurchase or sell shares for the purpose of:

implementing stock option plans,

awarding or selling shares to employees in connection with a company savings plan established in accordance with applicable law,

awarding free shares to certain employees and officers,

delivering shares to third parties upon exercise of rights attached to securities that give access to share capital through repayment, conversion, exchange, presentation of a warrant or in any other manner,

delivering shares (as exchange, payment or otherwise) in connection with transactions involving external growth, mergers, sales, spin-offs or contributions,

enhancing the secondary market or liquidity in respect of our shares through an investment services provider, in connection withpursuant to a liquidity contract signed with such provider conforming to professional rules approved by the AMF,

the completion of purchases, sales or transfers by any means through an investment services provider, in particular off-market transactions,

canceling all or a portion of repurchased shares, and

any other purpose that is or will be authorized by French laws and regulation.



186



Back to Contents


Share repurchases are subject to the following conditions: (i) the number of shares that we are allowed to purchase over the course of the share repurchase program may not exceed 10% of our share capital, (ii) the number of shares we may acquire to be held in treasury subsequently delivered in connection with mergers, spin-offs, or contributions may not exceed 5% of our share capital, and (iii) the number of shares that we may hold at any given moment may not exceed 10% of our share capital.

The maximum repurchase price under the program is €90€50 per share (or the corresponding amount in any other currency). The maximum purchase price applies only to share repurchases decided on after the annual general shareholders’ meeting held on May 10, 2007,7, 2009, and not to transactions entered into pursuant to an authorization granted by a prior shareholders’ meeting but providing for share repurchases to be carried out after the date of this meeting. In addition, we can only make payments for share repurchases up to an aggregate amount of €1.5€1 billion under the program. Our boardBoard of directorsDirectors has broad powers to implement the program and set, if necessary, the terms and conditions of any share repurchases, including the power to delegate any of its powers. The shareholders’ authorization for this program expires at the latest on November 10, 2008,7, 2010, which is 1 8 months18 mon ths after the date of the shareholders’ meeting that approved the program, unless our general shareholders’ meeting of May 7, 20082010 authorizes a new share repurchase program.

The share repurchase program approved on May 10, 20077, 2009 replaced our previous share repurchase program approved at our general shareholders’ meeting of May 11, 2006.7, 2008. Share repurchases made pursuant to these programs are detailed in Item 16E below.



153



Back to Contents


A new share repurchase program shallwill be proposed at the general shareholders’ meeting of May 7, 2008 authorizing2010. If approved, it will authorize our companyCompany to implement a new share repurchase plan for substantially the same purposes and subject to the same maximum percentage limits as those described above with respect to the program approved at the May 10, 20077, 2009 shareholders’ meeting. The maximum purchase price for shares under this resolution would be €90€40 per share (or the equivalent value at the same date in all other currencies), which maximum price shall only be applicable to acquisitions decided after the date of the combined general shareholders’ meeting of May 7, 20082010 and not to transactions concluded before this meeting but providing for share acquisitions to be carried out after the date of this meeting.Themeeting.The total amount allocated to this share repurchase planp lan authorized may not exceed €1 .5 billion. This authorization would replace any prior authorization granted to the boardBoard of directorsDirectors to trade in our shares, effective from May 7, 20082010 and if applicable for the value of any unused portion of any prior authorization. It would be granted for a period of eighteen months from the date of the combined general shareholders’ meeting.

As of April 30, 2008,December 31, 2009, we held 15,054,23714,731,592 shares, representing 3.19%2.98% of our share capital. The accounting value (not including provisions) of our total portfolio at that date was €459,207,263,€450,273,550, while the market value was €700,624,190.€ 340,688,065. None of our subsidiaries held any of our shares as ofat that date. We have not cancelled any of our shares over the past 24 months.

Anti-Takeover Provisions — Disclosure of Substantial Shareholdings

Ourstatuts currently provide that any person, acting alone or in concert with others, that fails to notify us within 15 days of acquiring,its crossing, directly or indirectly, through acquisition or disposingdisposal of our shares, of a threshold of 1% or any multiple of 1% of our shares or voting rights can be deprived of voting rights for shares in excess of the unreported fraction for all shareholders’ meetings until the end of a two-year period from the date on which such person returns to compliance with the notification requirements, if it is so required by one or several shareholders holding at least 1% of our share capital or voting rights. In addition, accredited intermediaries that hold shares on behalf of non-French resident shareholders are required to comply with this notification obligation in respect of the total amount of shares held on behalf of the non-French resident shareholders.sh areholders.

A modification of this provision of ourstatuts will be proposed at the shareholders’ meeting of May 7, 2008 in order to raise the first statutory declaration threshold to 2%. Should this resolution be approved by the shareholders’ meeting, any person, acting alone or in concert with others, that acquires, directly or indirectly, or disposes of a portion of our shares or voting rights equal to (i) an initial threshold of 2% of our shares or voting rights, or (ii) any percentage of our shares or voting rights equal to a multiple of 1% above this initial 2% threshold, must notify our company by registered letter, within five trading days of crossing this threshold, of the total number of shares, voting rights and securities granting access to our capital that it owns, directly or indirectly, alone or in concert with others.

Anti-Takeover Effects of Applicable Law and Regulations

In addition, the French commercial code provides that any individual or entity, acting alone or in concert with others, that becomes the owner, directly or indirectly, of more than 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, one-third,one third, 50%, two-thirds,two thirds, 90% and 95% of the outstanding shares or voting rights of a listed company in France, such as our company,Company, or that increases or decreases its shareholding or voting rights above or below any of those percentages, must notify the company, within 5 trading days of the date it crosses such thresholds, of the number of shares and voting rights it holds. The individual or entity must also notify the AMF within 5 trading days of the date it crosses these thresholds, which will make the information public. In the event the individual or entity is not domiciled in France, the financial intermediary that holds the shares on its behalf will be required to deliver these notices.



187



Back to Contents


French law and AMF regulations impose additional reporting requirements on persons who acquire more than 10%, 15%, 20%, or 20%25% of the outstanding shares or voting rights of a listed company. These persons must file a report with the company and the AMF within 105 trading days of the date they cross the threshold. In the report, the acquiroracquirer must specify the means of financing the acquisition, whether it it acts alone or in concert with others and disclose any agreement or temporary transfer of shares or voting rights as well as its strategic intentions for the following 12-monthsix month period, including whether or not it intends to continue its purchases, to acquire control of the company in question, orthe strategy it contemplates vis-à-vis the issuer and the way to nominate candidates forimplement it and whether it seeks nomination to the boardBoard of directors.Directors. The AMF makes the notice public. The acquiror may amend its stated intentions, provided that it does so on the basis of significant changes in its own situation or that of its shareholders. Upon any change ofo f intention, it must file a new report.



154



Back to Contents


motivated report for the following 6-month period.

If any person fails to comply with the legal notification requirement, the shares that exceed the relevant threshold will be deprived of voting rights for all shareholders’ meetings until the end of a two-year period following the date on which such person complies with the notification requirements. In addition, any shareholder who fails to comply with the specific requirements described above (including the declaration of intentions) when acquiring more than 10% or 20%the applicable legal threshold of the outstanding shares or voting rights of a listed company shall be deprived of voting rights for all the shares that exceed the relevant threshold for all shareholders’ meetings until the end of a two-year period following the date on which such person complies with the notification requirements.

To permit holders to give the required notice, we are required to publish in the BALO no later than 15 calendar days after the annual ordinary general meeting of shareholders information with respect to the total number of voting rights outstanding as of the date of such meeting. In addition, if the number of outstanding voting rights changes by 5% or more between two annual ordinary general meetings, we are required to publish in the BALO, within 15 calendar days of such change, the number of voting rights outstanding and provide the AMF with written notice of such information. However, these obligations are deemed to be fulfilled and not to apply to listed companies that are required to publish and send to the AMF on a monthly basis the total number of shares and voting rights composing their share capital, if such numbers have varied since the last publication.

Under AMF regulations, and subject to limited exemptions granted by the AMF, any person or persons acting in concert that own in excess of one-third of the share capital or voting rights of a French listed company must initiate a public tender offer for the remaining outstanding share capital of such company.

In addition, a number of provisions of the French commercial code allow corporations to adoptstatuts that have anti-takeover effects, including provisions that allow shares with double voting rights and limitations on the voting power of shareholders.



188



Back to Contents


EXCHANGE CONTROLS

The French commercial code currently does not limit the right of non-residents of France or non-French persons to own and vote shares. However, non-residents of France must file an administrative notice with French authorities in connection with the acquisition of a controlling interest in our company.Company. Under existing administrative rulings, ownership of 33 1/3% or more of our share capital or voting rights by non-residents of France is regarded as a controlling interest, but a lower percentage might be held to be a controlling interest in certain circumstances depending upon factors such as:

the acquiring party’s intentions,

the acquiring party’s ability to elect directors, or

financial reliance by us on the acquiring party.

French exchange control regulations currently do not limit the amount of payments that we may remit to nonresidents of France. Laws and regulations concerning foreign exchange controls do require, however, that all payments or transfers of funds made by a French resident to a nonresident be handled by an accredited intermediary. In France, all registered banks and most credit establishments are accredited intermediaries.



155189



Back to Contents


TAXATION

French Taxation

The following generally summarizes the material French tax consequences of purchasing, owning and disposing of our shares or ADSs. The statements relating to French tax laws set forth below are based on the laws in force as of the date hereof, and are subject to any changes in applicable laws and tax treaties after such date.

This discussion is intended only as a descriptive summary and does not purport to be a complete analysis or listing of all potential tax effects of the purchase, ownership or disposition of our shares or ADSs.

The following summary does not address the treatment of shares or ADSs that are held by a resident of France (except for purposes of describing related tax consequences for other holders) or in connection with a permanent establishment or fixed base through which a holder carries on business or performs personal services in France, or by a person that owns, directly or indirectly, 5% or more of the stock of our company.  Moreover, the following discussion of the tax treatment of dividends only deals with distributions made on or after January 1, 2006.Company.

There are currently no procedures available for holders that are not U.S. residents to claim tax treaty benefits in respect of dividends received on ADSs or shares registered in the name of a nominee. Such holders should consult their own tax adviser about the consequences of owning and disposing of ADSs.

Investors should consult their own tax advisers regarding the tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of shares in the light of their particular circumstances.

Taxation of Dividends on Shares

In France, dividends are paid out of after-tax income. Dividends paid to non-residents normally are subject to French withholding tax at a rate of 25% (18% for distributions made as from January 1, 2008 to individuals that are resident in the European Economic Area (the “EEA”), except Liechtenstein). From March 1, 2010, dividends paid by a French corporation towards non-cooperative States or territories, as defined in Article 238-0 A of the French General Tax Code, will generally be subject to French withholding tax at a rate of 50%, irrespective of the tax residence of the beneficiary of the dividends if the dividends are received in such States or territories.

However, non-resident holders that are entitled to and comply with the procedures for claiming benefits under an applicable tax treaty may be subject to a reduced rate (generally 15%) of French withholding tax. If a non-resident holder establishes its entitlement to treaty benefits prior to the payment of a dividend, then French tax generally will be withheld at the reduced rate provided under the treaty.

Tax Credit

French resident individuals are normally taxed on only 60% of the dividends they receive and, in addition to a fixed allowance, are entitled to a tax credit equal to 50% of all dividends received within one year (the “Tax Credit”), unless they elect to be subject to an 18% levy at the source on the full amount of any dividends they may receive (which election is available for distributions made as from January 1, 2008). The Tax Credit is capped at €230 for married couples and members of a union agreement subject to joint taxation and €115 for single persons, widows or widowers, divorcees or married persons subject to separate taxation.

Dividends paid to non-residents are not normally eligible for the Tax Credit described above. However, qualifying non-resident individuals may, depending on the provisions of the tax treaty possibly entered into between France and their country of residence, benefit from a refund of the Tax Credit (net of applicable withholding tax) under certain conditions, subject to compliance with the procedures for claiming benefits under the applicable treaty. The French tax authorities have not yet issued any guidance with regard to the procedures for claiming the refund of the Tax Credit to non-resident individuals. Individual investors are urged to consult their own tax advisers in this respect.



190



Back to Contents


Taxation on Sale or Disposition of Shares or ADSs

Subject to the more favorable provisions of a relevant tax treaty, holders that are not residents of France for tax purposes, do not hold shares or ADSs in connection with the conduct of a business or profession in France, and have not held more than 25% of our dividend rights (droits aux bénéfices sociaux), directly or indirectly, at any time during the preceding five years, are not subject to French income tax or capital gains tax on the sale or disposition of shares or ADSs.

However, subject to the more favorable provisions of a relevant tax treaty, holders that are not residents of France for tax purposes and do not hold shares or ADSs in connection with the conduct of a business or profession in France may be subject to French capital gains tax at the rate of 50% on the sale or disposition of shares or ADSs, irrespective of the number of shares or ADSs they hold, if such holders are domiciled, established or incorporated outside of France in a non-cooperative State or territory, as defined in Article 238-0 A 1.1%of the French General Tax Code.

A 3% ad valorem registration duty (subject to a maximum of €4000€5000 per transfer) applies to certain transfers of shares in French companies. This duty does not apply to transfers of shares in listed companies that are not evidenced by a written agreement, or if any such agreement is executed outside France.



156



Back to Contents


Estate and Gift Tax

France imposes estate and gift tax on shares or ADSs of a French corporation that are acquired by inheritance or gift. The tax applies without regard to the tax residence of the transferor. However, France has entered into estate and gift tax treaties with a number of countries pursuant to which, assuming certain conditions are met, residents of the treaty country may be exempted from such tax or obtain a tax credit.

Wealth Tax

Individuals who are not residents of France for purposes of French taxation are not subject to a wealth tax(impôt de solidarité sur la fortune) in France as a result of owning an interest in the share capital of a French corporation, provided that such ownership interest is less than 10% of the corporation’s share capital and does not enable the shareholder to exercise influence over the corporation. Double taxation treaties may provide for a more favorable tax treatment.

Taxation of U.S. Investors

The following is a summarydescription of the material French and U.S. federal income tax consequences for U.S. holders of the purchase, ownership and disposition of our shares or ADSs if youset forth below is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), final, temporary and proposed U.S. Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder and administrative and judicial interpretations thereof, in force as of the date hereof, and the Convention Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the French Republic for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Income and Capital of August 31, 1994 (the “Treaty”), which entered into force on December 30, 1995 (as amended by any subsequent protocols, including the protocol of January 13, 2009). All of the foregoing is subject to change. Such changes could apply retroact ively and could affect the consequences described below.

In particular, the United States and France signed a protocol on January 13, 2009, that made several changes to the Treaty, including changes to the “Limitation on Benefits” provision. The provisions of the protocol entered into force on December 23, 2009, and with respect to withholding taxes entered into force for amounts paid or accrued on or after January 1, 2009. U.S. holders are advised to consult their own tax advisors regarding the effect the protocol may have on their eligibility for Treaty benefits in light of their own particular circumstances.



191



Back to Contents


For the purposes of this discussion, a U.S. holder is a holder that is a resident of the United States for purposes of the income tax convention between the United StatesTreaty and France (the “Treaty”) and areis fully eligible for benefits under the Treaty (a “U.S. holder”). You generallyTreaty. A holder will be entitled to Treaty benefits in respect of our shares or ADSs if you are:he is:

the beneficial owner of the shares or ADSs (and the dividends paid with respect thereto);

an individual resident of the United States, a U.S. corporation or other entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, or an estate or trust to the extent its income is subject to taxation in the United States in its hands or in the hands of its beneficiaries;

not also a resident of France for French tax purposes; and

not subject to an anti-treaty shopping article that applies in limited circumstances.

Special rules apply to pension funds and certain other tax-exempt investors.

If a partnership (including any entity treated as a partnership for U.S. tax purposes) is a beneficial owner of shares or ADSs, the U.S. tax treatment of a partner in the partnership will generally depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. A holder of shares or ADSs that is a partnership and partners in such partnership should consult their tax advisors about the U.S. federal income tax consequences of holding and disposing of shares or ADSs.

For U.S. federal income tax purposes, a U.S. holder’s ownership of the company’sCompany’s ADSs will be treated as ownership of the company’sCompany’s underlying shares.

This summary does not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to any particular investor, and does not discuss tax considerations that arise from rules of general application or that are generally assumed to be known by investors. In particular, the summary does not deal with shares or ADSs that are not held as capital assets, and does not address the tax treatment of holders that are subject to special rules, such as banks, insurance companies, dealers in securities or currencies, regulated investment companies, persons that elect mark-to-market treatment, persons holding shares or ADSs as a position in a synthetic security, straddle or conversion transaction, persons that own, directly or indirectly, 5% or more of our voting stock or 10%5% or more of our outstanding capital and persons whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar. The summary is based on laws, treaties, regulatory interpretations and judicial decisions in effect on the date hereof, all of which are subject to change.d ollar.

This summary does not discuss the treatment of shares or ADSs that are held in connection with a permanent establishment or fixed base through which a holder carries on business or performs personal services in France. Moreover, the following discussion of the tax treatment of dividends only deals with distributions made on or after January 1, 2006.

You should consult your own tax advisers regarding the tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of shares or ADSs in the light of your particular circumstances, including the effect of any state, local or other national laws.



157



Back to Contents


Dividends

Generally, dividend distributions to non-residents of France are subject to French withholding tax at a rate of 25%  and are not eligible for the benefit. Furthermore, from March 1, 2010, dividends paid by a French corporation, towards non-cooperative States or territories, as defined in Article 238-0 A of the French General Tax Credit availableCode, will generally be subject to French resident individuals, as described above.withholding tax at a rate of 50%, irrespective of the tax residence of the beneficiary of the dividends if the dividends are received in such States or territories. However, under the Treaty, youa U.S. holder can claim the benefit of a reduced dividend withholding tax rate of 15%.

In addition, if you are an individual Following the entry into force of the protocol of January 13, 2009, U.S. holder, you mayholders should no longer be entitled to a refund of the Tax Credit less a 15% withholding tax, provided that you are subjectavailable to U.S. federal income tax on the Tax Credit and the dividend to which it relates. The French tax authorities have not yet issued guidance with respect to the procedures for claiming the refund of the Tax Credit to non-resident individuals.

U.S. holders that are notresident individuals are no longer entitled to tax credit payments from the French Treasury.described above.

French withholding tax will be withheld at the 15% Treaty rate if you have established before the date of payment that you are a resident of the United States under the Treaty by following the simplified procedure described below.

The gross amount of dividend and Tax Credit that a U.S. holder receives (prior to deduction of French withholding tax) generally will be subject to U.S. federal income taxation as ordinary dividend income to the extent paid or deemed paid out of the current or accumulated earnings and profits of our companyCompany (as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles). Such dividends will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction generally allowed to U.S. corporations.



192



Back to Contents


Subject to certain U.S. holder exceptions for short-term and hedged positions, the U.S. dollar amount of dividends received by an individual prior to January 1, 2011 with respect to the shares or ADSs will be subject to taxation at a maximum rate of 15% if the dividends are “qualified dividends.” Dividends paid on the shares or ADSs will be treated as qualified dividends if (i) the issuer is eligible for the benefits of a comprehensive income tax treaty with the United States that the IRS has approved for the purposes of the qualified dividend rules and (ii) our companyCompany was not a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”), in the year prior to the year in which the dividend was paid, and is not a PFIC in the year in which the dividend is paid. The Treaty has been approved for the purposes of the qualified dividend rules. Based on our company’sCompany’s audited fi nancialfinan cial statements and relevant market and shareholder data, our companyCompany believes that it was not treated as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes with respect to its 20062008 or 20072009 taxable years. In addition, based on our company’sCompany’s audited financial statements and its current expectations regarding the value and nature of its assets, the sources and nature of its income, and relevant market data, our companyCompany does not anticipate becoming a PFIC for its 20082010 taxable year. Accordingly, dividends paid by our companyCompany in 20082010 to a U.S. holder should constitute “qualified dividends” unless such holder acquired its shares or ADSs during a year in which our companyCompany was a PFIC and such holder did not make a mark-to-market election.an applicable election under U.S. tax laws.

Holders of ADSs and shares should consult their own tax advisers regarding the availability of the reduced dividend tax rate in the light of their own particular circumstances.

Distributions out of earnings and profits with respect to the shares or ADSs generally will be treated as dividend income from sources outside of the United States and generally will be treated as “passive category” (or, in the case of certain U.S. holders, “general category”) income for purposes of determining the credit for foreign income taxes allowed under the Code. Subject to certain limitations, French withholding tax withheld in connection with any distribution with respect to the shares or ADSs may be claimed as a credit against the U.S. federal income tax liability of a U.S. holder if such U.S. holder elects for that year to credit all foreign income taxes. Alternatively, such French withholding tax may be taken as a deduction against taxable income. Foreign tax credits will not be allowed for withholding taxes imposed in respect of certain short-term or hedged positions in securities. U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors concerning the implications of these rules in light of their particular circumstances.

To the extent that an amount received by a U.S. holder exceeds the allocable share of current and accumulated earnings and profits of our company,Company, such excess will be applied first, to reduce such U.S. holder’s tax basis in its shares or ADSs and then, to the extent it exceeds the U.S. holder’s tax basis, it will constitute capital gain from a deemed sale or exchange of such shares or ADSs.

Dividends paid in euros will be included in your income in a U.S. dollar amount calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the date you receive the dividend (or the date the depositary receives the dividend, in the case of the ADSs), regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars. If such a dividend is converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, you generally should not be required to recognize foreign currency gain or loss in respect of the dividend income.



158



Back to Contents


Procedures for Claiming Treaty Benefits

The French tax authorities issued new guidelines in theInstructionn° 4 J-1-05, dated February 25, 2005 that significantly changed the formalities to be complied with by non-resident shareholders, including U.S. holders, in order to obtain the reduced withholding tax rate on distributions made on or after January 1, 2005.

Pursuant to the new guidelines, U.S. holders can either claim Treaty benefits under a simplified procedure or under the normal procedure. The procedure to be followed depends on whether the application for Treaty benefits is filed before or after the dividend payment.

Under the simplified procedure, in order to benefit from the lower rate of withholding tax applicable under the Treaty before the payment of the dividend, youa U.S. holder must complete and deliver to the paying agent (through its account holder), a treaty form (Form 5000) to certify in particular that:

you are beneficially entitled to the dividend;

you are a U.S. resident within the meaning of the Treaty;

the dividend is not derived from a permanent establishment or a fixed base that you own in France; and

the dividend received is or will be reported to the tax authorities in the United States.



193



Back to Contents


For partnerships or trusts, claims for Treaty benefits and related attestations are made by the partners, beneficiaries or grantors who also have to supply certain additional documentation.

In order to be eligible for Treaty benefits, pension funds and certain other tax-exempt U.S. holders must comply with the simplified procedure described above, though they may be required to supply additional documentation evidencing their entitlement to those benefits.

If Form 5000 is not filed prior to the dividend payment, a withholding tax will be levied at the 25% rate, and you would have to claim a refund for the excess under the normal procedure by filing both Form 5000 and Form 5001 no later than December 31 of the second year following the year in which the dividend is paid.

Copies of Form 5000 and Form 5001 can be downloaded from the French tax authorities’ website (www.impots.gouv.fr) and are also available from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and from theCentre des Impôts des Non-Résidents in France (10 rue du Centre, 93160 Noisy-le-Grand).

Finally, please note that, as mentioned above, the French tax authorities have not yet issued any guidance with respect to the procedures for claiming the refund of the Tax Credit to non-resident individuals.

Capital Gains

Under the Treaty, youa U.S. holder will not be subject to French tax on any gain derived from the sale or exchange of shares or ADSs, unless the gain is effectively connected with a permanent establishment or fixed base maintained by you in France.

In general, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, a U.S. holder that sells, exchanges or otherwise disposes of its shares or ADSs will recognize capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the U.S. dollar difference between the amount realized for the shares or ADSs and the holder’s adjusted tax basis (determined in U.S. dollars) in the shares or ADSs.ADSs (determined in U.S. dollars). Such gain or loss generally will be U.S.-source gain or loss, and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the shares were held for more than one year. The net long-term capital gain recognized by an individual U.S. holder before January 1, 2011 generally is subject to taxation at a maximum rate of 15%. Your ability to offset capital losses against ordinary income is limited.

French Estate and Gift Tax

Under the estate and gift tax conventionConvention between the Government of the United States of America and France,the Government of the French Republic for the Avoidance of Double Taxation and the Prevention of Fiscal Evasion with Respect to Taxes on Estates, Inheritances and Gifts, dated November 24, 1978 (as amended by any subsequent protocols), a transfer of shares or ADSs by gift or by reason of the death of a U.S. holder entitled to benefits under that convention will not be subject to French gift or inheritance tax, so long as the donor or decedent was not domiciled in France at the time of the transfer, and the shares or ADSs were not used or held for use in the conduct of a business or profession through a permanent establishment or fixed base in France.



159



Back to Contents


French Wealth Tax

The French wealth tax does not generally apply to shares or ADSs of a U.S. Holderholder if the holder is a resident of the United States for purposes of the Treaty.


U.S. Information Reporting and Backup Withholding Rules

Payments of dividends and sales proceeds that are made within the United States or through certain U.S.-related financial intermediaries are subject to information reporting and may be subject to backup withholding unless the holder (i) is a corporation or other exempt recipient or (ii) provides a taxpayer identification number and certifies that no loss of exemption from backup withholding has occurred. Holders that are not U.S. persons generally are not subject to information reporting or backup withholding. However, such a holder may be required to provide a certification of its non-U.S. status in connection with payments received within the United States or through a U.S.-related financial intermediary.




194



Back to Contents


DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY

Certain documents referred to in this document can be inspected at our offices at 36/38, avenue Kléber, 75116 Paris, France.

We are subject to the periodic reporting and other informational requirements of the Exchange Act. Under the Exchange Act, we are required to file reports and other information with the SEC. Specifically, we are required to file annually a Form 20-F no later than six months after the close of each fiscal year. Copies of reports and other information, when so filed, may be inspected without charge and may be obtained at prescribed rates at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at Judiciary Plaza, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information regarding the SEC’s Public Reference Rooms by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from the rules under the Exchange Act prescribing the furnishing and content of quarterly reports and proxy statements, and officers, directors and principal shareholderssharehold ers are exempt from the reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions in Section 16 of the Exchange Act.



195



Back to Contents


ENFORCEABILITY OF CIVIL LIABILITIES AGAINST FOREIGN PERSONS

Our companyCompany is a corporation organized under the laws of France. All of our directors are citizens and residents of countries other than the United States, and the majority of our assets are located outside of the United States. Accordingly, it may be difficult for investors:

to obtain jurisdiction over our companyCompany or our directors in courts in the United States in actions predicated on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws;

to enforce judgments obtained in such actions against us or our directors;

to obtain judgments against us or our directors in original actions in non-U.S. courts predicated solely upon the U.S. federal securities laws; or

to enforce against us or our directors in non-U.S. courts judgments of courts in the United States predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws.

Actions brought in France for enforcement of judgments of U.S. courts rendered against French persons, including some directors of our company,Company, would require those persons to waive their right to be sued in France under Article 15 of the French Civil Code. In addition, actions in the United States under the U.S. federal securities laws could be affected under certain circumstances by the French law of July 16, 1980, which may preclude or restrict the obtaining of evidence in France or from French persons in connection with those actions. Each of the foregoing statements applies to our auditors as well.



160



Back to Contents



STATEMENT ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 303A.11 OF THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE’S LISTED COMPANY MANUAL

Set forth below is a brief summary of the principal ways in which our corporate governance practices differ from the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) corporate governance rules applicable to U.S. domestic companies listed on the NYSE.


Our company is incorporated under the laws of France and the principal trading market for our shares is the Eurolist of Euronext Paris. Our ADSs are listed on the NYSE and trade in the form of American Depositary Receipts (ADRs), each of which represent one Veolia Environnement ordinary share.


Our corporate governance practices reflect applicable laws and regulations in France as well as those in the U.S., including applicable provisions of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act (see “Item 6: Directors, Senior Management and Employees” for information regarding our current corporate governance structure, including the composition and responsibilities of our committees). Many of the corporate governance rules in the NYSE Listed Company Manual (the NYSE Manual) do not apply to us as a “foreign private issuer.” However, Rule 303A.11 requires foreign private issuers to describe significant differences between their corporate governance standards and the corporate governance standards applicable to U.S. domestic companies listed on the NYSE. While our management believes that our corporate governance practices are similar in many respects to those of U.S. NYSE-listed companies and provide investors with protections that are comparable in many respects to those established by the NYSE Manual, there are certain important differences which are described below.


Our board of directors annually evaluates the independence of its members based on criteria set forth in its internal charter, which are based on the recommendations of the report of a French blue ribbon panel chaired by Mr. Daniel Bouton for the improvement of corporate governance in French public companies. We believe that these criteria for independence are generally consistent with those of the NYSE Manual (i.e., to qualify as “independent” under our charter, a director must not have any relations with our company, our subsidiaries or our management that could impair his objective judgment).  However, the specific tests of “independence” may differ on certain points.


Under French law, the committees of our board of directors are advisory in nature and have no independent or delegated decision making authority. This is different than in the case of a U.S. company listed on the NYSE where, for example, the NYSE Manual requires that certain board committees be vested with decision-making powers on certain matters (e.g. nominations or audit committees). Under French law, ultimate decision-making authority rests with the board of directors, and board committees are charged with examining matters within the scope of their charter and making recommendations on these matters to the board of directors. In addition, under French law the decision as to appointment of a company’s outside auditors belongs to the company’s shareholders and must be made by the shareholders at their annual general meeting upon recommendation of the board of directors. This is different than in the case of a U.S. company listed on the NYSE, where the NYSE Manual requires that this decision be made by the audit committee of the board. Finally, unlike U.S. NYSE-listed companies which are required to have only a single outside auditor, French law requires French listed companies likes ours to have two statutory auditors. In this respect, the requirements and spirit of French law are consistent with the overriding goal of the NYSE Manual (i.e., the audit of a listed company’s accounts must be conducted by auditors independent from company management).


With respect to related party transactions, French law requires the board of directors to approve a broadly-defined range of transactions that could potentially create conflicts of interest between our company, on the one hand, and our directors and executive officers, on the other hand. While the precise scope of this requirement and its application may differ from those applicable to U.S. NYSE-listed companies, this requirement is generally consistent with various provisions of the NYSE Manual that require disclosure and/or approval of various types of related party transactions.




161



Back to Contents


Finally, as a foreign private issuer, our company is exempt from rules imposing certain disclosure and procedural requirements for proxy solicitations under Section 14 of the Exchange Act. In addition, our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and “short-swing” profit recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules under the Exchange Act with respect to their purchases and sales of our ordinary shares and ADSs. In addition, our company is not required to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or promptly as U.S. companies with securities registered under the Exchange Act, nor are we required to comply with Regulation FD, which restricts the selective disclosure of material information. As a result, there may be less publicly-available information concerning our company than for U.S. NYSE-listed companies. Fi nally, as a foreign private issuer, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer issue the certifications required by Sections 302 and 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act on an annual basis (with the filing of our annual report on Form 20-F), rather than on a quarterly basis as would be the case of a U.S. domestic company filing quarterly reports on a Form 10-Q.


For more information regarding our corporate governance practices, you should also refer to our articles of association (statuts), which are filed as an exhibit to this annual report.



162196



Back to Contents


ITEM 11: 11.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

In the course of our operating and financing activities, we are exposed to the following market risks: interest rate risk, foreign exchange risk, commodity risk, counterparty risk and equity risk.

In order to reduce our exposure to these risks, we centralize the management of these financial risks in order to ensure better control. Activities are based on the management rules detailed in the internal manual “Rules governing financing/treasury management and related risks” widely distributed to Group entities. These rules are based on the principles of security, transparency and effectiveness.

We use various derivative instruments to reduce and manage our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates, exchange rates and commodity prices, not all of which qualify for hedge accounting. All these derivatives are recognized in the balance sheet at fair value.

See Note 30Notes 28 and 29 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information about derivative instruments accounting and market risk management.


ITEM 12: 12.

DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

Not Applicable.


ITEM 12D.

AMERICAN DEPOSITARY SHARES

Our ordinary shares trade in the United States under a sponsored ADR facility with The Bank of New York Mellon as depositary.

Fees Payable by ADS Holders

The Bank of New York Mellon, as the Company’s Depositary (the “Depositary”), collects its fees for delivery and surrender of ADSs directly from investors depositing shares or surrendering ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal or from intermediaries acting for them. The Depositary collects fees for making distributions to investors by deducting those fees from the amounts distributed or by selling a portion of distributable property to pay the fees. The Depositary may generally refuse to provide fee-attracting services until fees for those services are paid.

The following table summarizes various fees currently charged by the Depositary:

Fees:

For:

$5.00 (or less) per 100 ADSs (or portion of 100 ADSs

-

Issuance of ADSs, including issuances resulting from a distribution of shares or rights or other property,

Cancellation of ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal, including if the deposit agreement terminates. 

$0.02 (or less) per ADS

-

Any cash distribution to ADS registered holders. 

A fee equivalent to the fee that would be payable if securities distributed to you had been shares and the shares had been deposited to issuance of ADSs

-

Distribution of securities distributed to holders of deposited securities which are distributed by the Depositary to ADS registered holders. 

Registration or transfer fees

-

Transfer and registration of shares on our share register to or from the name of the Depositary or its agent when you deposit or withdraw shares 

Expenses of the Depositary

-

Cable, telex and facsimile transmissions

-

Converting foreign currency to U.S. dollars 

Taxes and other governmental charges the Depositary or the custodian have to pay on any ADS or share underlying an ADS, for example, stock transfer taxes, stamp duty or withholding taxes 

As necessary 

Any charges incurred by the Depositary or its agents for servicing the deposited securities 

-

As necessary


163

197



Back to Contents


Fees Payable to the Company by the Depositary

From January 1, 2009 to April 16, 2010, no amounts were reimbursed by the Depositary to the Company.

The Depositary has agreed to reimburse the Company for expenses it incurs that are related to establishment and maintenance expenses of the ADS program. The Depositary has agreed to reimburse the Company for its continuing annual stock exchange listing fees. The Depositary has also agreed to pay the standard out-of-pocket maintenance costs for the ADRs, which consists of the expenses of postage and envelopes for mailing annual and interim financial reports, printing and distributing dividend checks, electronic filing of U.S. Federal tax information, mailing required tax forms, stationery, postage, facsimile and telephone calls. It has also agreed to reimburse the Company annually for certain investor relationship programs or special investor relations promotional activities. In certain instances, the Depositary has agreed to provide additional payments to the Company based on any ap plicable performance indicators relating to the ADR facility. There are limits on the amount of expenses for which the Depositary will reimburse the Company, but the amount of reimbursement available to the Company is not necessarily tied to the amount of fees the Depositary collects from investors.

The Depositary collects its fees for delivery and surrender of ADSs directly from investors depositing shares or surrendering ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal, or from intermediaries acting for them. The Depositary collects fees for making distributions to investors by deducting those fees from the amounts distributed or by selling a portion of distributable property to pay the fees. The Depositary may collect its annual fee for depositary services by deduction from cash distributions or by directly billing investors or by charging the book-entry system accounts of participants acting for them. The Depositary may generally refuse to provide fee-attracting services until its fees for those services are paid.




198



Back to Contents


PART II

ITEM 13.

DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES

None.

ITEM 14.

MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 15.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures


We carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the chief executive officerChief Executive Officer and chief financial officer,Chief Finance Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2007.2009. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon our evaluation, the chief executive officerChief Executive Officer and chief financial officerChief Finance Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 20072009 were effective to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in reportsre ports that it fileswe file under the U.S. Securities Exchange Ac tAct of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act, of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officerChief Executive Officer and chief financial officer,Chief Finance Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.


Internal Controls


Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting:


Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13A-15(f). Management assessed the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20072009 based on the framework in “Internal Control — Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.


Based on that assessment, management has concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 20072009 to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of its financial reporting and the preparation of its financial statements for external purposes, in compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board and with IFRS as adopted by the European Union.


Due to its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements, and can only provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting has been audited by KPMG SA and Ernst & Young et Autres, independent registered public accounting firms, as stated in their report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007,2009, which is included herein.




164



Back to Contents


For an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firms, see the report of KPMG SA and Ernst & Young et Autres, independent registered public accounting firms, included under “Item 18. Financial Statements” on page F-2.


There were no changes to our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Annual Report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.



199



Back to Contents


ITEM 16A.

AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

Our board of directorsAccounts and Audit Committee has determined thatfour members in accordance with the three current members of our accounts and audit committee, Messrs. Murray Stuart (chairmanrequirements of the accountsBoard of Directors’charter: Daniel Bouton (Chairman), Pierre-André de Chalendar, Jean-Marc Espalioux and audit committee),Paul-Louis Girardot. Messrs. Jean-Marc Espalioux, and Paul-Louis Girardot, qualify as “audit committee financial experts” within the meaning of this Item 16A. All of themthe committee members are deemed to be independent based on criteria set forth in our boardBoard of directors’Directors’ charter, as well as based on the criteria of the NYSE Listed Company Manual.

ITEM 16B.

CODE OF ETHICS

We have adopted a code of ethics, as defined in Item 16B. of Form 20-F under the Exchange Act. Our code of ethics applies to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer,Chief Executive Officer, Chief Finance Officer, chief accounting officer and other officers performing similar functions, as designated from time to time. Our code of ethics was filed as an exhibit to our annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003, and is incorporated by reference herein. We will disclose any amendment to the provisions of such code of ethics or any waiver that our boardBoard of directorsDirectors may grant.


ITEM 16C.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Pursuant to French law, two independent accounting firms audit our financial statements and provide related services permissible under applicable French and U.S. laws and regulations. In respect of fiscal year 2007,2009, our independent auditors are Ernst & Young et Autres and KPMG SA, which was appointed statutory auditor in replacement of Salustro Reydel in 2007. In accordance with French law, we consider each of these auditing firms as our principal accountants. During 2007,2009, we paidwere billed total fees of €23.7€17.9 million to KPMG and €22.9€19.3 million to Ernst & Young for the services described below. The fees set forth below billed by KPMG and Ernst & Young in 2008 and 2009 do not include fees charged to equity affiliates or proportionally consolidated entities.

Audit Fees

During 2007,2009, we paid €16.5were billed €14.8 million in fees toby KPMG and €16.8€14.9 million toby Ernst & Young for professional audit services relating to the audit of our financial statements and other services normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. During 2006,2008, we paid €14.4were billed €14.2 million in fees toby KPMG and €14.5€16.1 million toby Ernst & Young in connection with such services.

Audit-Related Fees

During 2007,2009, we paid €7.2were billed €3.1 million in fees toby KPMG and €6.1€4.4 million toby Ernst & Young for services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the financial statements and not reported under “Audit Fees” above, including for comfort letters issued by our auditors in connection with our offerings of securities, certification services not required by regulation and acquisition-related audits. During 2006,2008, we paid €7.3were billed € 4.0 million in fees toby KPMG and €5.6€ 5.0 million toby Ernst & Young in connection with such services.

Tax Fees

During 20062008 and 2007,2009, we didwere not paybilled any fees toby KPMG or toby Ernst & Young for services related to tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.

All Other Fees

During 20062008 and 2007,2009, we didwere not paybilled any fees toby KPMG or toby Ernst & Young for products and services other than the ones noted above.



165200



Back to Contents


Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Our accountsAccounts and audit committeeAudit Committee is responsible, among other matters, for the oversight of our independent statutory auditors subject to the requirements of French law. Our accountsAccounts and audit committeeAudit Committee has established a list of prohibited non-audit services in order to ensure the independence of our independent statutory auditors. Our accountsAccounts and audit committeeAudit Committee has also adopted a policy and established certain procedures for the approval of audit and permissible non-audit services and for the pre-approval of audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided by our independent statutory auditors. DuringSince 2005, our accountsAccounts and audit committee establishedAudit Committee establishes an annual budget, broken down and detailed as to the type of service to be provided and the authorized amount for such service, for all permissible audit and non-audit services (including on-going non-audit engagements). Our accountsAc counts and audit committeeAudit Committee also delegated to its chairmanChairman or one of its other members the responsibility for pre-approving any new permissible audit or non-audit engagements that exceeded such budgeted amounts for the particular permissible audit or non-audit service. Any engagements pre-approved by the chairmanChairman or other delegate must be reported to the full audit committee at its next succeeding meeting.


During 2007,2009, no services were provided to our companyCompany by our independent statutory auditors pursuant to the de minimis exception to the pre-approval requirement provided by paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.


ITEM 16D.

EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES

Not Applicable.

ITEM 16E.

PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

In 2007,2009, the following purchases of our shares were made by our company:Company:

Period

Total number of shares purchased

Average price paid per share (in euros)

Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs

Maximum amount that may be allocated to the purchase of shares under the plans or programs (in euros)

01/01/2007 to 01/31/2007

0

n/a

0

1,500,000,000

02/01/2007 to 02/28/2007

0

n/a

0

1,500,000,000

03/01/2007 to 03/31/2007

0

n/a

0

1,500,000,000

04/01/2007 to 04/30/2007

0

n/a

0

1,500,000,000

05/01/2007 to 05/31/2007

0

n/a

0

1,500,000,000

06/01/2007 to 06/30/2007

0

n/a

0

1,500,000,000

07/01/2007 to 07/31/2007

0

n/a

0

1,500,000,000

08/01/2007 to 08/31/2007

0

n/a

0

1,500,000,000

09/01/2007 to 09/30/2007

0

n/a

0

1,500,000,000

10/01/2007 to 10/31/2007

0

n/a

0

1,500,000,000

11/01/2007 to 11/30/2007

0

n/a

0

1,500,000,000

12/01/2007 to 12/31/2007

0

n/a

0

1,500,000,000

Period

Total number
of shares
purchased

Average price
paid per share
(in euros)

Total number
of shares
purchased
as part of
publicly announced
plans or programs

Maximum amount
that may
be allocated
to the purchase
of shares
under the plans
or programs
(in euros)

01/01/2009 to 01/31/2009

0

n/a

0

1,494,547,408.61

02/01/2009 to 02/28/2009

0

n/a

0

1,494,547,408.61

03/01/2009 to 03/31/2009

0

n/a

0

1,494,547,408.61

04/01/2009 to 04/30/2009

0

n/a

0

1,494,547,408.61

05/01/2009 to 05/31/2009

0

n/a

0

1,000,000,000

06/01/2009 to 06/30/2009

0

n/a

0

1,000,000,000

07/01/2009 to 07/31/2009

0

n/a

0

1,000,000,000

08/01/2009 to 08/31/2009

0

n/a

0

1,000,000,000

09/01/2009 to 09/30/2009

0

n/a

0

1,000,000,000

10/01/2009 to 10/31/2009

0

n/a

0

1,000,000,000

11/01/2009 to 11/30/2009

0

n/a

0

1,000,000,000

12/01/2009 to 12/31/2009

0

n/a

0

1,000,000,000


At the general shareholders’ meeting held on May 11, 2006,7, 2009, our shareholders approved a share repurchase program that authorized us to purchase, sell and transfer itsour shares at any time, except during a public offer, as permitted under applicable laws and regulations, and by any means, on the market or over-the-counter, including through block trades, public offers to purchase, sell or exchange, or through the use of derivative financial instruments traded on a market or over-the-counter, or through the delivery of shares following the issuance by us of convertible securities and combinations of financial derivative instruments granting rights to our sharescapital by means of conversion, exchange, reimbursement,redemption, exercise of warrants or in any other instruments, inway, either directly or indirectly via the intermediary of an investment services provider. The share repurchase may be for an amount of up to 10% of our share capital. In addition,capital, provided that we may not hold more than 10%1 0% of our share capital at any time.



201



Back to Contents


This authorization allows us to trade in our own securities with the following objectives: (i) implementing stock option plans, (ii) awarding free shares, (iii) awarding or selling shares to employees in respect of their association with the benefits of our expansion and the implementation of any company savings plan, (iv) delivering shares when rights are exercised that are attached to securities that grant access to the capital via redemption, conversion, exchange, presentation of a warrant or in any other manner, (v) delivering shares in connection with external growth transactions, mergers, spin-offs or contributions; (vi) stimulating the secondary market for or the liquidity of our shares through an investment services provider, within the scope of a liquidity contract that complies with the ethics charter recognized by the AMF, or, lastly, (vii) canceling all or part of the sh ares thus repurchased.

The maximum repurchase price under the program was fixedset by shareholders at €60the May 7, 2009 meeting at €50 per share and the maximum amount that we may allocate to the share repurchase program was set at €1.5€1 billion. This program expired on May 10, 2007, when it was replaced by a new program aut horized by our shareholders, as described inSee “Item 10. Additional Information—Trading in Our Own Shares.”

The shareholders’ authorization for this 20072009 share repurchase program is due to expire at the latest on November 10, 2008,7, 2010, which is 18 months after the date of the shareholders’ meeting that approved the program, unless superseded by a new program that may be adopted at our general shareholders’ meeting of May 7, 2008.2010.


ITEM 16F.

CHANGE IN REGISTRANT’S CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT

N/A

ITEM 16G.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


STATEMENT ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 303A.11 OF THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE’S LISTED COMPANY MANUAL

Set forth below is a brief summary of the principal ways in which our corporate governance practices differ from the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) corporate governance rules applicable to U.S. domestic companies listed on the NYSE.

Our Company is incorporated under the laws of France and the principal trading market for our shares is Euronext Paris. Our ADSs are listed on the NYSE and trade in the form of American Depositary Receipts (ADRs), each of which represent one Veolia Environnement ordinary share.

Our corporate governance practices reflect applicable laws and regulations in France and conform to the provisions of the consolidated version of the AFEP-MEDEF Code of December 2008 (the “AFEP-MEDEF Code”), which is a code of recommended practices for governance and executive compensation that is widely used in France and which our Company has decided to qualify as its “reference code” in accordance with French law. Our practices also reflect U.S. laws and regulations, including applicable provisions of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act (see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees” for information regarding our current corporate governance structure, including the composition and responsibilities of our Committees). Many of the corporate governance rules in the NYSE Listed Company Manual (the NYSE Manual) do not apply to us as a “foreign pri vate issuer.” However, Rule 303A.11 requires foreign private issuers to describe significant differences between their corporate governance standards and the corporate governance standards applicable to U.S. domestic companies listed on the NYSE. While our management believes that our corporate governance practices are similar in many respects to those of U.S. NYSE-listed companies and provide investors with protections that are comparable in many respects to those established by the NYSE Manual, there are certain important differences which are described below.

Our Board of Directors annually evaluates the independence of its members based on criteria set forth in its internal charter, which are based on the recommendations of the AFEP-MEDEF Code. We believe that these criteria for independence are generally consistent with those of the NYSE Manual (i.e., to qualify as “independent” under our charter, a director must not have any relations with our Company, our subsidiaries or our management that could impair his objective judgment). However, the specific tests of “independence” may differ on certain points. For example, Mr. de Romanet de Beaune is independent under French standards but not under Rule 10A-3 of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended because he is Chief Executive Officer of Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations, which holds approximately 10% of our shares.



166202



Back to Contents


Under French law, the Committees of our Board of Directors are advisory in nature and have no independent or delegated decision making authority. This is different than in the case of a U.S. company listed on the NYSE where, for example, the NYSE Manual requires that certain board Committees be vested with decision-making powers on certain matters (e.g. nominations or audit committees). Under French law, ultimate decision-making authority rests with the Board of Directors, and board committees are charged with examining matters within the scope of their charter and making recommendations on these matters to the Board of Directors. In addition, under French law the decision as to appointment of a company’s outside auditors belongs to the company’s shareholders and must be made by the shareholders at their annual general meeting upon recommendation of the Board of Directors. This is different than in the case of a U.S. company listed on the NYSE, where the NYSE Manual requires that this decision be made by the audit committee of the board. Finally, unlike U.S. NYSE-listed companies which are required to have only a single outside auditor, French law requires French listed companies like ours to have two statutory auditors. In this respect, the requirements and spirit of French law are consistent with the overriding goal of the NYSE Manual (i.e., the audit of a listed company’s accounts must be conducted by auditors independent from company management).

With respect to related party transactions, French law requires the Board of Directors to approve a broadly-defined range of transactions that could potentially create conflicts of interest between our Company, on the one hand, and our directors and executive officers, on the other hand. While the precise scope of this requirement and its application may differ from those applicable to U.S. NYSE-listed companies, this requirement is generally consistent with various provisions of the NYSE Manual that require disclosure and/or approval of various types of related party transactions.

Finally, as a foreign private issuer, our Company is exempt from rules imposing certain disclosure and procedural requirements for proxy solicitations under Section 14 of the Exchange Act. In addition, our officers, directors and principal shareholders are exempt from the reporting and “short-swing” profit recovery provisions of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and the rules under the Exchange Act with respect to their purchases and sales of our ordinary shares and ADSs. In addition, our Company is not required to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or promptly as U.S. companies with securities registered under the Exchange Act, nor are we required to comply with Regulation FD, which restricts the selective disclosure of material information (although similar rules apply to us in France). As a result, there may be less publicly-available information concerning our Company than for U.S. NYSE-listed companies. Finally, as a foreign private issuer, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Finance Officer issue the certifications required by Sections 302 and 906 of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act on an annual basis (with the filing of our annual report on Form 20-F), rather than on a quarterly basis as would be the case of a U.S. domestic company filing quarterly reports on a Form 10-Q.

For more information regarding our corporate governance practices, you should also refer to our articles of association (statuts), which are filed as an exhibit to this annual report. See “Item 10. Additional Information.”




203



Back to Contents


PART III

ITEM 17: 17.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Not Applicable.

ITEM 18: 18.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

INDEX TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

Page

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms

F-1

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 20052007

F-3

Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 20052007

F-5F-4

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 20052007

F-6

Consolidated Statements of Recognized Income and Expense
Changes in Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 20052007

F-8F-7

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

F-9F-11


ITEM 19: 19.

EXHIBITS

The following exhibits are included herein:


Exhibit

Number

Description


1

Articles of Association (statuts) of Veolia Environnement (free English translation).


8

List of Subsidiaries. Included herein in Note 4543 to our consolidated financial statements.


11

Code of Ethics (previously filed as Exhibit 11 to our annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 and incorporated by reference herein).


12.1

Certifications by Henri Proglio, Chairman andAntoine Frérot, Chief Executive Officer, and Jérôme Contamine, Senior Executive Vice President andPierre-François Riolacci, Chief FinancialFinance Officer, required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


13.1

Certifications by Henri Proglio, Chairman andAntoine Frérot, Chief Executive Officer, and Jérôme Contamine, Senior Executive Vice President andPierre-François Riolacci, Chief FinancialFinance Officer, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


15.1

Excerpt of report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors for 2007 as required by Art. 117 of the French Financial Security Law (Loi de Sécurité Financière) (free English translation)


15.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms.





204



Back to Contents

167



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS


Year ended December 31, 20072009

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Veolia Environnement,

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsstatements of financial position of Veolia Environnement and subsidiaries (the "Company"(hereafter the “Company”) as of December 31, 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 2005,2007, and the related consolidated income statements, consolidated statements of comprehensive income, cash-flowsconsolidated cash-flow statements and recognized income and expensesconsolidated statements of changes in equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007.2009. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 2005,2007, and the consolidated results of its operations and its consolidated cash-flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007,2009, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union and in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007,2009, based on criteria established inInternal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria) and our report dated May 6, 2008April 19, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Paris Lala Défense and Neuilly-sur-Seine, May 6, 2008.Neuilly sur Seine, France, April 19, 2010


The Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms

KPMG AUDIT
A division of KPMG SA

ERNST & YOUNG et Autres

  

Jay Nirsimloo

Baudouin Griton

Patrick GounellePierre Hurstel

Jean BouquotNicolas Pfeuty






F-1



Back to Contents


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS


Year ended December 31, 2007

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Veolia Environnement S.A.2009

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Veolia Environnement S.A.and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2007,2009 of Veolia Environnement S.A. and subsidiaries (hereafter the “Company”), based on criteria established inInternal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (hereafter “the COSO criteria”). Veolia Environnement S.A.'sThe Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying report of management on internal control over financial reporting as disclosed in item 15.reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, andrisk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company'scompany’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurancea ssurance regarding pre ventionprevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Veolia Environnement S.A.the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007,2009, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheetsstatements of Veolia Environnement S.A. and subsidiariesfinancial position of the Company as of December 31, 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 2005,2007, and the related consolidated income statements, consolidated statements of comprehensive income, cash flowsconsolidated cash-flow statements and recognized income and expensesconsolidated statements of changes in equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007,2009, and our report dated May 6, 2008April 19, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

Paris Lala Défense and Neuilly-sur-Seine, May 6, 2008.Neuilly sur Seine, France, April 19, 2010

The Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms

KPMG AUDIT
A division of KPMG SA

ERNST & YOUNG et Autres

  

Jay Nirsimloo

Baudouin Griton

Patrick GounellePierre Hurstel

Jean BouquotNicolas Pfeuty



F-2



Back to Contents



CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF VEOLIA ENVIRONNEMENT
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION - ASSETS

Notes

As of December 31,

(€ million)

 

2009

2008

2007

Goodwill

4

 6,624.6

 6,723.3

 6,913.2

Concession intangible assets

5

 3,624.8

 3,637.7

 2,989.2

Other intangible assets

6

 1,437.8

 1,535.2

 1,706.4

Property, plant and equipment

7

 9,382.4

 9,427.1

 9,203.2

Investments in associates

8

 268.5

 311.6

 292.1

Non-consolidated investments

9

 174.6

 202.8

 256.1

Non-current operating financial assets

10

 5,275.2

 5,298.9

 5,272.4

Non-current derivative instruments - Assets

28

 431.9

 508.4

 123.7

Other non-current financial assets

11

 753.9

 817.3

 746.0

Deferred tax assets

12

 1,621.3

 1,579.5

 1,468.1

Non-current assets

 

 29,595.0

 30,041.8

 28,970.4

Inventories and work-in-progress

13

 997.3

1,022.0

 839.4

Operating receivables

13

 12,247.5

13,093.2

 12,459.4

Current operating financial assets

10

 376.6

452.3

 355.2

Other current financial assets

11

 217.7

321.4

 330.0

Current derivative instruments - Assets

28

 45.6

142.8

 114.4

Cash and cash equivalents

14

 5,614.4

3,849.6

 3,115.6

Assets classified as held for sale

24

 722.6

203.0

 122.5

Current assets

 

 20,221.7

 19,084.3

 17,336.5

Total assets

 

 49,816.7

 49,126.1

 46,306.9


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION - EQUITY AND LIABILITIES

Notes

As of December 31,

(€ million)

 

2009

2008

2007

Share capital

 

 2,468.2

 2,362.9

 2,358.8

Additional paid-in capital

 

 9,433.2

 9,197.5

 9,179.5

Reserves and retained earnings attributable to owners of the Company

 

 (4,440.8)

 (4,559.2)

 (3,925.4)

Total equity attributable to owners of the Company

15

 7,460.6

 7,001.2

 7,612.9

Total equity attributable to non-controlling interests

 

 2,670.1

 2,530.5

 2,577.8

Equity

15

 10,130.7

 9,531.7

 10,190.7

Non-current provisions

16

 2,291.1

 2,160.2

 2,138.9

Non-current borrowings

17

 17,647.3

 17,063.9

 13,948.0

Non-current derivative instruments – Liabilities

28

 139.3

 159.9

 163.8

Deferred tax liabilities

12

 1,951.2

 1,936.0

 1,794.7

Non-current liabilities

 

 22,028.9

 21,320.0

 18,045.4

Operating payables

13

 13,075.7

 13,591.8

 12,944.8

Current provisions

16

 749.2

 773.1

 825.7

Current borrowings

17

 2,983.1

 3,219.7

 3,805.0

Current derivative instruments - Liabilities

28

 84.8

 125.9

 34.0

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

14

 454.9

 465.7

 459.4

Liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale

24

 309.4

 98.2

 1.9

Current liabilities

 

 17,657.1

 18,274.4

 18,070.8

Total equity and liabilities

 

 49,816.7

 49,126.1

 46,306.9


CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETThe accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET - ASSETS

Notes

As of December 31,

(€ million)

 

2007

2006

2005

Goodwill

4

6,913.2

5,705.0

4,752.3

Concession intangible assets

5

2,989.2

2,345.6

2,091.8

Other intangible assets

6

1,706.4

1,379.8

1,281.4

Property, plant and equipment

7

9,203.2

7,918.7

6,885.7

Investments in associates

8

292.1

241.0

201.5

Non-consolidated investments

9

256.1

181.7

209.5

Non-current operating financial assets

10

5,272.4

5,133.4

5,337.4

Non-current derivative instruments - Assets

30

123.7

201.6

249.0

Other non-current financial assets

11

746.0

637.5

691.6

Deferred tax assets

12

1,468.1

1,355.7

1,134.7

Non-current assets

 

28,970.4

25,100.0

22,834.9

Inventories and work-in-progress

13

839.4

731.8

635.2

Operating receivables

13

12,459.4

10,968.7

10,083.3

Current operating financial assets

10

355.2

326.2

208.0

Other current financial assets

14

330.0

205.3

221.2

Marketable securities

 

-

66.4

60.7

Current derivative instruments - Assets

30

114.4

-

-

Cash & cash equivalents

15

3,115.6

2,658.0

2,336.1

Current assets

 

17,214.0

14,956.4

13,544.5

Assets classified as held for sale

 

122.5

67.3

1.6

Total assets

 

46,306.9

40,123.7

36,381.0



F-3



Back to Contents



CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET - EQUITY AND LIABILITIES

Notes

As of December 31,

(€ million)

 

2007

2006

2005

Share capital

 

2,358.8

2,063.1

2,039.4

Additional paid-in capital

 

9,179.5

6,641.2

6,499.1

Reserves and retained earnings attributable to equity holders of the parent

 

(3,925.4)

(4,343.5)

(4,748.3)

Minority interests

 

2,577.8

2,192.6

1,888.0

Equity

16

10,190.7

6,553.4

5,678.2

Non-current provisions and other debt

17

2,138.9

2,196.6

1,648.0

Other non-current liabilities

17

-

207.3

203.7

Non current borrowings

18

13,948.0

14,001.6

13,722.8

Non-current derivative instruments – Liabilities

30

163.8

145.9

154.5

Deferred tax liabilities

12

1,794.7

1,504.9

1,205.0

Non-current liabilities

 

18,045.4

18,056.3

16,934.0

Operating payables

13

12,944.8

11,268.6

10,369.8

Current provisions

17

825.7

825.9

754.0

Current borrowings

19

3,805.0

2,904.1

2,138.2

Current derivative instruments – Liabilities

30

34.0

-

-

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

20

459.4

456.0

506.8

Current liabilities

 

18,068.9

15,454.6

13,768.8

Liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale

 

1.9

59.4

-

Total equity and liabilities

 

46,306.9

40,123.7

36,381.0

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



F-4



Back to Contents



CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT


(€ million)

Notes

Year ended December 31,

Notes

Year ended December 31,

 

2007

2006

2005

 

2009

2008(2)

2007(2)

Revenue

21

32,628.2

28,620.4

25,570.4

18

34,551.0

35,764.8

31,574.1

o/w Revenue from operating financial assets

 

345.1

351.0

325.8

 

394.4

397.9

342.1

Cost of sales

 

(26,929.6)

(23,427.1)

(20,869.9)

 

(28,786.2)

(30,013.4)

(25,710.4)(1)

Selling costs

 

(551.3)

(515.2)

(478.5)

 

(602.6)

(621.4)

(560.4)(1)

General and administrative expenses

 

(2,757.0)

(2,611.2)

(2,394.9)

 

(3,338.1)

(3,218.6)

(2,905.8)(1)

Other operating revenue and expenses

 

106.6

66.0

65.8

 

196.0

49.4

63.6

Operating income

22

2,496.9

2,132.9

1,892.9

19

2,020.1

1,960.8

2,461.1

Finance costs

23

(969.6)

(783.8)

(774.0)

20

(880.4)

(1,111.2)

(958.0)

Finance income

23

152.5

82.8

63.3

20

96.1

202.2

151.1

Other financial income and expenses

24

1.4

(34.0)

28.1

21

(110.3)

(39.2)

2.3

Income tax expense

25

(420.1)

(409.6)

(422.4)

22

(242.2)

(462.0)

(399.7)

Share of net income of associates

8 & 26

16.9

6.0

6.5

8 & 23

1.4

19.4

17.1

Net income from continuing operations

 

1,278.0

994.3

794.4

 

884.7

570.0

1,273.9

Net income from discontinued operations

27

(23.2)

0.6

0.7

24

(42.8)

139.2

(19.1)

Net income for the year

 

1,254.8

994.9

795.1

 

841.9

709.2

1,254.8

Minority interests

28

326.9

236.2

172.9

Attributable to equity holders of the parent

 

927.9

758.7

622.2

Non-controlling interests

25

257.8

304.1

326.9

Attributable to owners of the Company

 

584.1

405.1

927.9

      

(in euros)

      

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent per share

29

  

Net income attributable to owners of the Company per share(3)

26

   

Diluted

 

2.13

1.89

1.56

 

1.24

0.87

2.11

Basic

 

2.16

1.90

1.57

 

1.24

0.88

2.13

Net income from continuing operations attributable to equity holders of the parent per share

29

  

Net income from continuing operations attributable to owners of the Company per share(3)

26

   

Diluted

 

2.19

1.88

1.56

 

1.33

0.71

2.17

Basic

 

2.21

1.90

1.57

 

1.33

0.71

2.19


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

(1)In 2008, as part of ongoing efficiency measures, the Group reclassified certain expenses from cost of sales to selling costs and general and administrative expenses. These reclassifications had no impact on operating income (see Note 19 Operating income).

(2)In accordance with IFRS 5,Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations, the results of operations of:

the Clemessy and Crystal entities in the Energy Services Division, divested in December 2008;

the entities of the U.S. waste-to-energy activity in Environmental Services (Montenay International) and Freight activities (essentially in France, Germany and the Netherlands) divested in the second half of 2009;

Transportation activities in the United Kingdom and renewable energy activities in the process of divestiture at the year end are presented in a separate line, “Net income from discontinued operations,” for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007.

(3)Pursuant to IAS 33, the weighted average number of shares outstanding taken into account for the calculation of 2008 and 2007 net income per share was adjusted following the distribution of a scrip dividend in June 2009. The adjusted number of earning per share is therefore 462.2 million as of December 31, 2008 and 434.8 million as of December 31, 2007 (see Note 26).

In 2009, the weighted average number of shares is 471.7 million (diluted and basic).



F-5F-4



Back to Contents



CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME


(€ million)

Notes

Year ended December 31,

  

2007

2006

2005

Net income for the year attributable to equity holders of the parent

 

927.9

758.7

622.2

Minority interests

28

326.9

236.2

172.9

Operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses

22

1,816.7

1,831.0

1,690.7

Financial amortization and impairment losses

 

8.0

9.4

(21.0)

Gains (losses) on disposal and dilution

 

(173.5)

(73.3)

(70.0)

Share of net income of associates

8 & 26

(16.9)

(6.0)

(14.9)

Dividends received

24

(8.8)

(9.7)

(6.5)

Finance costs and finance income

23

817.1

701.0

712.4

Income tax expense

25

420.1

357.1

422.4

Other items (including IFRS2)

 

101.9

40.0

33.7

Operating cash flow before changes in working capital

 

4,219.4

3,844.4

3,541.9

Changes in working capital

13

(167.1)

(111.8)

(39.4)

Income taxes paid

 

(417.7)

(343.0)

(338.8)

Net cash from operating activities

 

3,634.6

3,389.6

3,163.7

Capital expenditure

22

(2,518.7)

(2,017.6)

(1,837.1)

Proceeds on disposal of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment

 

212.9

141.3

168.8

Purchases of investments

 

(1,835.4)

(1,291.5)

(944.1)

Proceeds on disposal of financial assets

 

181.7

206.7

154.0

Operating financial assets:

10

   

New operating financial assets

 

(404.1)

(360.6)

(513.4)

Principal payments on operating financial assets

 

360.7

438.1

320.6

Dividends received

8 & 24

15.3

13.8

16.8

New non current loans granted

11

(65.0)

(69.4)

(62.1)

Principal payments on non current loans

11

61.6

29.2

55.7

Net decrease (increase) in current loans

14

(27.4)

2.6

115.0

Sales and purchases of marketable securities

 

-

3.4

118.2




F-6



Back to Contents



(€ million)

Notes

Year ended December 31,

  

2007

2006

2005

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(4,018.4)

(2,904.0)

(2,407.6)

Net increase/(decrease) in current borrowings

19

(1,534.5)

(239.2)

(2,936.2)

New non current borrowings and other debt

18

2,060.4

1,997.2

3,134.8

Principal payments on non current borrowings and other debt

18

(1,362.9)

(1,000.8)

(2,319.6)

Proceeds on issue of shares

 

3,039.2

246.5

81.0

(Purchase)/Proceeds of treasury shares

 

18.9

0.4

-

Dividends paid

 

(564.3)

(479.2)

(374.0)

Interest paid

 

(716.0)

(596.4)

(738.8)

Net cash from (used in) financing activities

 

940.8

(71.5)

(3,152.8)

Net cash at the beginning of the year

 

2,202.0

1,829.3

4,240.2

Effect of foreign exchange rate changes

 

(102.8)

(41.4)

(14.2)

Net cash at the end of the year

 

2,656.2

2,202.0

1,829.3

Cash & cash equivalents

15

3,115.6

2,658.0

2,336.1

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

20

459.4

456.0

506.8

Net cash at the end of the year

 

2,656.2

2,202.0

1,829.3



Discontinued operations as per the definition of IFRS 5 contributed -€5.9 million, -€10 million and +€8.9 million to net cash from operating activities, -€126.7 million, +€12.2 million and +€5.4 million to net cash from investing activities and +2.7 million, +€10.3 million and - €4.4 million to net cash from financing activities in 2007, 2006 and 2005 respectively.

(€ million)

 Year ended December 31,

 

2009

2008

2007

    

Net income for the year

841.9

709.2

1,254.8

    

Actuarial gains or losses on pension obligations

(67.8)

(138.1)

114.4

Related income tax expense

14.3

34.1

(26.4)

Amount net of tax

(53.5)

(104.0)

88.0

    

Fair value adjustments on available-for-sale assets

(3.3)

(18.2)

33.8

Related income tax expense

(0.6)

(0.2)

(0.1)

Amount net of tax

(3.9)

(18.4)

33.7

    

Fair value adjustments on cash flow hedge derivatives

46.2

(112.8)

15.5

Related income tax expense

(5.8)

24.2

(6.7)

Amount net of tax

40.4

(88.6)

8.8

    

Foreign exchange gains and losses:

   

- on the translation of the financial statements of subsidiaries drawn up in a foreign currency

65.2

(279.8)

(251.5)

Amount net of tax

65.2

(279.8)

(251.5)

- on the net financing of foreign operations

2.2

(31.8)

(6.5)

- related income tax expense

3.8

15.9

1.0

Amount net of tax

6.0

(15.9)

(5.5)

    

Other comprehensive income

54.2

(506.7)

(126.5)

Total comprehensive income for the year

896.1

202.5

1,128.3

 - Attributable to owners of the Company

657.1

(84.4)

778.5

 - Attributable to non-controlling interests

239.0

286.9

349.8


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



F-5



Back to Contents


CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT

(€ million)

Notes

Year ended December 31,

  

2009

2008

2007

Net income for the year attributable to owners of the Company

 

584.1

405.1

927.9

Net income for the year attributable to non-controlling interests

25

257.8

304.1

326.9

Operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses

19

2,230.4

2,301.6

1,816.7

Financial amortization and impairment losses

 

7.2

19.5

8.0

Gains/(losses) on disposal and dilution

19

(306.1)

(288.2)

(173.5)

Share of net income of associates

8

0.9

(18.5)

(16.9)

Dividends received

21

(8.7)

(8.4)

(8.8)

Finance costs and finance income

20

792

922.8

817.1

Income tax expense

22

311.9

470.9

420.1

Other items (including IFRS 2)

 

69.1

69.5

101.9

Operating cash flow before changes in working capital

 

3,938.6

4,178.4

4,219.4

Changes in working capital

13

432.1

(80.9)

(167.1)

Income taxes paid

 

(408.5)

(347.5)

(417.7)

Net cash from operating activities

 

3,962.2

3,750.0

3,634.6

Capital expenditure

41

(2,465.7)

(2,780.6)

(2,518.7)

Proceeds on disposal of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment

 

258.7

329.8

212.9

Purchases of investments

 

(187.0)

(800.7)

(1,835.4)

Proceeds on disposal of financial assets

 

582.3

361.1

181.7

Operating financial assets:

    

New operating financial assets

10

(483.1)

(507.0)

(404.1)

Principal payments on operating financial assets

10

455.2

358.2

360.7

Dividends received

8 & 21

14.8

15.8

15.3

New non-current loans granted

 

(43.8)

(252.7)

(65.0)

Principal payments on non-current loans

 

65.8

30.0

61.6

Net decrease/(increase) in current loans

 

140.9

(89.0)

(27.4)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(1,661.9)

(3,335.1)

(4,018.4)

Net increase/(decrease) in current borrowings

17

(1,323.9)

(1437.0)

(1,534.5)

New non-current borrowings and other debt

17

3,301.2

3,590.2

2,060.4

Principal payments on non-current borrowings and other debt

17

(1,514.8)

(184.8)

(1,362.9)

Proceeds on issue of shares

 

157.1

51.0

3,039.2

Share capital reduction

15

 

(131.0)

-

(Purchases of)/proceeds from treasury shares(1)

 

4.9

3.2

18.9

Dividends paid(1)

 

(434.0)

(754.4)

(564.3)

Interest paid

 

(729.8)

(847.6)

(716.0)

Net cash from/(used in) financing activities

 

(539.3)

289.6

940.8

Net cash at the beginning of the year

 

3,383.9

2,656.2

2,202.0

Effect of foreign exchange rate changes and other

 

14.6

23.2

(102.8)

Net cash at the end of the year

 

5,159.5

3,383.9

2,656.2

Cash and cash equivalents

14

5,614.4

3,849.6

3,115.6

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

14

454.9

465.7

459.4

Net cash at the end of the year

 

5,159.5

3,383.9

2,656.2


(1)

 See the Statement of Changes in Equity



Net cash flows attributable to discontinued operations as defined in IFRS 5 contributed -€31.1 million, +€37.8 million and +€55.1 million to net cash from operating activities, +€266.6 million, +€148.4 million and -€94.1 million to net cash from investing activities and -€5.7 million, -€26.3 million and -€26.9 million to net cash from financing activities in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

Discontinued operations are presented in Note 24.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



F-6



Back to Contents


STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

(€ million)

Number
of shares
outstanding

Share
Capital

Additional
paid-in
capital

Treasury
shares

Consolidated
reserves
and retained
earnings

Foreign
exchange
translation
reserves

Fair
value
reserves

Equity
attributable
to owners of
the Company

Non-
controlling
interests

Total
equity

As of January 1,
2007

412,626,550

2,063.1

6,641.2

(479.6)

(3,986.7)

144.6

(21.8)

4,360.8

2,192.6

6,553.4

Issues of share capital of the parent company

59,136,206

295.7

2,538.3

-

33.8

-

-

2,867.8

-

2,867.8

Elimination of treasury shares

 

-

-

18.9

(0.3)

-

-

18.6

-

18.6

Share purchase and subscription options

 

-

-

-

15.6

-

-

15.6

-

15.6

Third party share in share capital increases of subsidiaries and changes in consolidation scope

 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

178.5

178.5

Parent company dividend distribution

 

-

-

-

(419.7)

-

-

(419.7)

-

(419.7)

Third party share in dividend distributions of subsidiaries

 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(144.6)

(144.6)

Foreign exchange translation

 

-

-

-

-

(264.3)

-

(264.3)

15.4

(248.9)

Fair value adjustments

 

-

-

-

-

(8.1)

47.1

39.0

(0.8)

38.2

Actuarial gains or losses on pension obligations

 

-

-

-

79.5

-

-

79.5

8.5

88.0

Net income for the year

 

-

-

-

927.9

-

-

927.9

326.9

1,254.8

Other changes

 

-

-

-

(17.3)

8.7

(3.7)

(12.3)

1.3

(11.0)

As of December 31, 2007

471,762,756

2,358.8

9,179.5

(460.7)

(3,367.2)

(119.1)

21.6

7,612.9

2,577.8

10,190.7




F-7



Back to Contents



STATEMENT OF RECOGNIZED INCOME AND EXPENSE


(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Net income for the year

1,254.8

994.9

795.1

Actuarial gains or losses on pension obligations

88.0

25.6

(144.7)

Fair value adjustments on available-for-sale assets

33.7

(2.3)

(2.4)

Fair value adjustments on cash flow hedge derivative instruments

8.8

37.0

13.7

Foreign exchange gains and losses:

   

- on the translation of the financial statements of subsidiaries drawn up in a foreign currency

(251.5)

(92.3)

331.8

- on the net financing of foreign investments

(5.5)

(7.8)

(13.8)

Income and expenses recognized directly in equity

(126.5)

(39.8)

184.7

Total income and expenses recognized

1,128.3

955.1

979.8

Attributable to equity holders of the parent

778.5

712.2

783.8

Attributable to minority interests

349.8

242.9

195.9

Impact of changes in accounting method on retained earnings as of January 1 (IAS1.96 (d))

-

(15.3)

(8.4)

(€ million)

Number
of shares
outstanding

Share
Capital

Additional
paid-in
capital

Treasury
shares

Consolidated
reserves
and retained
earnings

Foreign
exchange
translation
reserves

Fair
value
reserves

Equity
attributable
to owners of the Company

Non-
controlling
interests

Total
equity

As of December 31, 2007

471,762,756

2,358.8

9,179.5

(460.7)

(3,367.2)

(119.1)

21.6

7,612.9

2,577.8

10,190.7

Issues of share capital of the parent company

813,910

4.1

17.9

    

22.0

-

22.0

Elimination of treasury shares

   

3.2

2.3

  

5.5

-

5.5

Share purchase and subscription options

    

5.5

  

5.5

 

5.5

Third party share in share capital increases of subsidiaries and changes in consolidation scope

        

(129.0)

(129.0)

Parent company dividend distribution

    

(553.5)

  

(553.5)

 

(553.5)

Third party share in dividend distributions of subsidiaries

        

(200.8)

(200.8)

Foreign exchange translation

     

(591.9)

 

(591.9)

(1.9)

(593.8)

Fair value adjustments

     

298.1

(101.6)

196.5

(10.5)

186.0

Actuarial gains or losses on pension obligations

    

(94.8)

  

(94.8)

(9.2)

(104.0)

Net income for the year

    

405.1

  

405.1

304.1

709.2

Other changes

    

13.1

(20.0)

0.8

(6.1)

 

(6.1)

As of December 31, 2008

472,576,666

2,362.9

9,197.4

(457.5)

(3,589.5)

(432.9)

(79.2)

7,001.2

2,530.5

9,531.7



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



F-8



Back to Contents



(€ million)

Number of
shares
outstanding

Share
Capital

Additional
paid-in
capital

Treasury
shares

Consolidated
reserves and
retained
earnings

Foreign
exchange
translation
reserves

Fair value
reserves

Equity
attributable to
owners of the Company

Non-
controlling
interests

Total
equity

As of
December 31,
2008

472,576,666

2,362.9

9,197.4

(457.5)

(3,589.5)

(432.9)

(79.2)

7,001.2

2,530.5

9,531.7

           

Issues of share capital of the parent company(1)

21,053,708

105.3

235.8

    

341.1

 

341.1

Elimination of treasury shares

   

4.9

   

4.9

 

4.9

Share purchase and subscription options

    

10.3

  

10.3

 

10.3

Third party share in share capital increases of subsidiaries

        

149.8

149.8

Third party share in changes in consolidation scope

        

(45.0)

(45.0)

Parent company dividend distribution

    

(553.8)

  

(553.8)

 

(553.8)

Third party share in dividend distributions of subsidiaries

        

(202.0)

(202.0)

Foreign exchange translation

     

82.4

 

82.4

(17.2)

65.2

Foreign investments

     

82.0

 

82.0

(0.1)

81.9

Actuarial gains or losses on pension obligations

    

(51.2)

  

(51.2)

(2.3)

(53.5)

Fair value adjustments on cash flow hedge derivatives

     

(75.9)

35.6

(40.3)

4.8

(35.5)

Fair value adjustments on available-for-sale assets

      

0.1

0.1

(4.0)

(3.9)

TOTAL other comprehensive income

    

(51.2)

88.5

35.7

73.0

(18.8)

54.2

Net income for the year

    

584.1

  

584.1

257.8

841.9

Other changes

    

(0.2)

  

(0.2)

(2.2)

(2.4)

As of December 31, 2009

493,630,374

2,468.2

9,433.2

(452.6)

(3,600.3)

(344.4)

(43.5)

7,460.6

2,670.1

10,130.7




F-9



Back to Contents


The dividend distribution per share was €1.21 in 2009 and 2008 and €1.05 in 2007.

A dividend distribution of €1.21 per share is proposed to the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of May 7, 2010.

The total dividend paid recorded in the Consolidated Cash Flow Statement for the year ended December 31, 2009 of €434 million includes:

(€ million)

2009

Dividend distribution by the parent company

(554)

Third party share in dividend distributions of subsidiaries

(202)

Scrip dividend(1)

 322

Total dividend paid

(434)


(1)

The lines “Proceeds on issue of shares” and “Dividends paid” in the Consolidated Cash Flow Statement are presented net of scrip dividends as such distributions do not generate cash flows.




F-10



Back to Contents


NOTE 1.1

Accounting principles and methods

1.1

PreparationAccounting standards framework

1.1.1

Basis underlying the preparation of the 2007 financial statementsinformation

In accordance with European Parliament and CouncilPursuant to Regulation (EC) No.1606/n°1606/2002 of July 19, 2002, andas amended by European Commission Regulation (EC) No.1725/2003regulation n°297/2008 of September 29, 2003,March 11, 2008, the Veolia Environnement consolidated financial statements are, sincefor the year ended December 31, 2005,2009 are presented in accordance with IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) as adopted by the European Union and IFRS as published by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). These standards may be consulted at the following European Union website: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/accounting/ias/index_fr. htm

These financial statements are accompanied, for comparative purposes, by financial statements for fiscal years 2008 and 2007 drawn up in accordance with the same standards framework.

Since fiscal year 2006, the Group has accounted for its concession business in accordance with the principles set out in IFRIC 12, Service Concession Arrangements, published by the IASB on November 30, 2006 and adopted by the European Union on March 26, 2009.

In the absence of IFRS standards or interpretations and in accordance with IAS 8,Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors, Veolia Environnement has useduses other standard references and in particular U.S. standards.

Veolia Environnement SA1.1.2

Standards, standard amendments and its subsidiaries (hereinafter referred to asinterpretations applicable from fiscal year 2009

The accounting principles and valuation rules applied by the “Group”) have appliedGroup in preparing the consolidated financial statements for the first time IFRS 7 on financial instrument disclosures andyear ended December 31, 2009 are identical to those applied by the amendment to IAS 1 on capital disclosures.

Veolia Environnement does not consider that the implementation of the following interpretations had a material impactGroup as of December 31, 2007:2008, with the exception of the following standards, standard amendments and interpretations which came into mandatory effect as of January 1, 2009 or July 1, 2009:

IFRS 8,Operating Segments

The impact of the implementation of this new standard is presented in Note 1.26 below.

IAS 1 Revised,Presentation of Financial Statements

Pursuant to the revised standard, the “Balance sheet” is now known as the “Consolidated Statement of Financial Position” and the changes resulting from transactions with owners of the Company acting in this capacity are presented separately from transactions with non-controlling interests in the Statement of Changes in Equity, which is now presented with the financial statements.

IFRIC 18,Transfers of assets from Customers

IFRIC 18,Transfers of Assets from Customers, is applicable from July 1, 2009 but was not adopted by the European Union until December 1, 2009. The interpretation is of prospective applicability and the Group did not elect for early adoption.

The interpretation covers situations where a customer transfers an asset to a supplier at the beginning of a contract, which the supplier must then use for the supply of goods or services. This interpretation also applies to cash transferred by a customer to finance the acquisition or construction of assets by the supplier to be used for the supply of goods or services. Contracts and services covered by the provisions of IFRIC 12 are specifically excluded from the scope of this interpretation.

Within the Group, this interpretation is likely to impact the Water and Energy Services Divisions. The Group has allocated the necessary resources to analyze the contracts signed since July 1, 2009, likely to fall within the application scope of IFRIC 18.



F-11



Back to Contents


IAS 23 Revised,Borrowing Costs

Amendments to IAS 32 and IAS 1,Financial Instruments – Presentation: puttable financial instruments and obligations arising on liquidation

Amendments to IFRS 1 and IAS 27 relating to the cost of an investment on first-time adoption of IAS/IFRS

Amendment to IFRS 2,Share-based Paymentvesting conditions and cancellations

Amendments arising from the 2006-2008 annual improvement process, with the exception of the amendments to IFRS 5

Amendment to IFRS 7,Financial Instruments: DisclosuresImprovements to Financial Instrument Disclosures

Amendment to IAS 39 and IFRIC 9 relating to embedded derivatives

IFRIC 13,Customer Loyalty Programmes

IFRIC 15,Agreements for the Construction of Real Estate

IFRIC 16,Hedges of a Net Investment in a Foreign Operation

Implementation of these standards and interpretations did not have a material impact.

1.1.3

Texts which enter into mandatory effect after December 31, 2009 and which have not been adopted early

Veolia Environnement has not elected for early adoption of the following standards, standard amendments and interpretations published as of December 31, 2009 (adopted or in the course of being adopted by the European Union):

IFRS 3 Revised,Business Combinations

Amendment to IAS 27,Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements

The application of IFRS 3 Revised and IAS 27 Revised is likely to have a material impact on future business combinations or transactions with non-controlling interests.

Amendments resulting from the 2007-2009 annual improvement process (not adopted by the European Union).

Pursuant to the new amendment specifying the conditions for implementing IAS 7, the Group will eliminate the replacement costs detailed in Note 19, Operating income, from “Net cash from operating activities” in the Consolidated Cash Flow Statement, from January 1, 2010.

Consequently, when adjusting “Net income attributable to owners of the Company” to obtain “Net cash from operating activities”, replacement costs will no longer be eliminated under “Operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses.” This amendment has no impact on net income or equity.

Amendments to IAS 28 and IAS 31 subsequent to IFRS 3 revised

IAS 24 Revised,Related Party Disclosures (not adopted by the European Union)

Amendment to IAS 32,Financial Instruments: Disclosures: Classification of rights issues

Amendment to IAS 39,Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement:Eligible Hedged Items

Amendment to IFRS 2,Share-based Payment - Group cash-settled share-based payment transactions, (not adopted by the European Union)



F-12



Back to Contents


Amendment to IFRS 5 resulting from the 2006-2008 annual improvement process

IFRIC 7,Applying the restatement approach under IAS 29 – Financial reporting in hyperinflationary economies17, Distribution of Non-cash Assets to Owners

IFRIC 8,19,Scope of IFRS 2 – Share-based paymentExtinguishing Financial Liabilities with Equity Instruments (not adopted by the European Union)

Amendment to IFRIC 9,  14,ReassessmentPrepayments of embedded derivativesa Minimum Funding Requirement(not adopted by the European Union)

IFRIC 10,IFRS 9,Interim financial reportingFinancial Instruments, Classification and impairmentMeasurement (not adopted by the European Union)

DueSubject to changes intheir definitive adoption by the European Union, these standards, standard amendments and interpretations are of mandatory application from July 1, 2009 or later, that is from January 1, 2010 or later for the Group. The Group a certain number of balance sheet headings have been amended to enable a more relevant analysisis currently assessing the potential impact of the accounts, consistent with changes infirst-time application of these new texts.

1.2

General principles underlying the standards base over recent years. These amendments did not impact either equity or net income forpreparation of the year.financial statements

The accounting methods presented below have been applied consistently for all periods presented in the consolidated financial statements.

The consolidated financial statements are presented on the basis of historical cost, , with the exception of assets and liabilities recognized at fair value: derivative instruments,derivatives, financial instruments held for trading, financial instruments designated at fair value and available-for-sale financial instruments (in accordance with IAS 32 and IAS 39).

The Veolia Environnement consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20072009 were closedadopted by the Board of Directors on March 6, 200824, 2010 and will be presented atfor approval to the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders on May 7, 2008.2010.

1.21.3

Basis of presentation as of December 31, 20072009

The consolidated financial statements are presented in millions of euro, unless stated otherwise.

The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of Veolia Environnement SA and its subsidiaries as of December 31 each year.subsidiaries. The financial statements of subsidiaries are drawn up for the same reference period as those of the parent company, from January 1, to December 31, 2009, in accordance with uniform accounting policies and methods.

All inter-company balances and transactions, together with all income and expense items and unrealized gains and losses included in the net carrying amount of assets, resulting from internal transactions, are eliminated in full.

Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date of acquisition, which is the date on which the Group obtains control, up to the date on which it ceases to exercise control.

MinorityNon-controlling interests represent the part of net income or loss and of net assets not held by the Group. They are presented separately in the Consolidated Income Statement, the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income and in equity in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, separately from equity attributable to equity holdersthe owners of the parent in Equity in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.Company.



1.4

F-9



Back to Contents


1.3

PrinciplesPresentation of ConsolidationFinancial Statements

Pursuant to the revised standard, the “Balance sheet” is now known as the “Consolidated Statement of Financial Position” and the changes resulting from transactions with owners of the Company acting in this capacity are presented separately from transactions with non-controlling interests in the Statement of Changes in Equity, which is now presented with the financial statements.

IFRIC 18,Transfers of assets from Customers

IFRIC 18,Transfers of Assets from Customers, is applicable from July 1, 2009 but was not adopted by the European Union until December 1, 2009. The interpretation is of prospective applicability and the Group did not elect for early adoption.

The interpretation covers situations where a customer transfers an asset to a supplier at the beginning of a contract, which the supplier must then use for the supply of goods or services. This interpretation also applies to cash transferred by a customer to finance the acquisition or construction of assets by the supplier to be used for the supply of goods or services. Contracts and services covered by the provisions of IFRIC 12 are specifically excluded from the scope of this interpretation.

Within the Group, this interpretation is likely to impact the Water and Energy Services Divisions. The Group has allocated the necessary resources to analyze the contracts signed since July 1, 2009, likely to fall within the application scope of IFRIC 18.



F-11



Back to Contents


IAS 23 Revised,Borrowing Costs

Amendments to IAS 32 and IAS 1,Financial Instruments – Presentation: puttable financial instruments and obligations arising on liquidation

Amendments to IFRS 1 and IAS 27 relating to the cost of an investment on first-time adoption of IAS/IFRS

Amendment to IFRS 2,Share-based Paymentvesting conditions and cancellations

Amendments arising from the 2006-2008 annual improvement process, with the exception of the amendments to IFRS 5

Amendment to IFRS 7,Financial Instruments: DisclosuresImprovements to Financial Instrument Disclosures

Amendment to IAS 39 and IFRIC 9 relating to embedded derivatives

IFRIC 13,Customer Loyalty Programmes

IFRIC 15,Agreements for the Construction of Real Estate

IFRIC 16,Hedges of a Net Investment in a Foreign Operation

Implementation of these standards and interpretations did not have a material impact.

1.1.3

Texts which enter into mandatory effect after December 31, 2009 and which have not been adopted early

Veolia Environnement fully consolidates all entities over which it exercises control. Controlhas not elected for early adoption of the following standards, standard amendments and interpretations published as of December 31, 2009 (adopted or in the course of being adopted by the European Union):

IFRS 3 Revised,Business Combinations

Amendment to IAS 27,Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements

The application of IFRS 3 Revised and IAS 27 Revised is defined aslikely to have a material impact on future business combinations or transactions with non-controlling interests.

Amendments resulting from the ability2007-2009 annual improvement process (not adopted by the European Union).

Pursuant to govern, directlythe new amendment specifying the conditions for implementing IAS 7, the Group will eliminate the replacement costs detailed in Note 19, Operating income, from “Net cash from operating activities” in the Consolidated Cash Flow Statement, from January 1, 2010.

Consequently, when adjusting “Net income attributable to owners of the Company” to obtain “Net cash from operating activities”, replacement costs will no longer be eliminated under “Operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses.” This amendment has no impact on net income or indirectly,equity.

Amendments to IAS 28 and IAS 31 subsequent to IFRS 3 revised

IAS 24 Revised,Related Party Disclosures (not adopted by the European Union)

Amendment to IAS 32,Financial Instruments: Disclosures: Classification of rights issues

Amendment to IAS 39,Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement:Eligible Hedged Items

Amendment to IFRS 2,Share-based Payment - Group cash-settled share-based payment transactions, (not adopted by the European Union)



F-12



Back to Contents


Amendment to IFRS 5 resulting from the 2006-2008 annual improvement process

IFRIC 17, Distribution of Non-cash Assets to Owners

IFRIC 19,Extinguishing Financial Liabilities with Equity Instruments (not adopted by the European Union)

Amendment to IFRIC 14,Prepayments of a Minimum Funding Requirement(not adopted by the European Union)

IFRS 9,Financial Instruments, Classification and Measurement (not adopted by the European Union)

Subject to their definitive adoption by the European Union, these standards, standard amendments and interpretations are of mandatory application from July 1, 2009 or later, that is from January 1, 2010 or later for the Group. The Group is currently assessing the potential impact of the first-time application of these new texts.

1.2

General principles underlying the preparation of the financial statements

The accounting methods presented below have been applied consistently for all periods presented in the consolidated financial statements.

The consolidated financial statements are presented on the basis of historical cost, with the exception of assets and operating policies of an entity in order to obtain the benefit of its activities.liabilities recognized at fair value: derivatives, financial instruments held for trading, financial instruments designated at fair value and available-for-sale financial instruments (in accordance with IAS 32 and IAS 39).

Companies in whichThe Veolia Environnement exercises significant influence overconsolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 were adopted by the Board of Directors on March 24, 2010 and operating policieswill be presented for approval to the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders on May 7, 2010.

1.3

Basis of presentation as of December 31, 2009

The consolidated financial statements are accounted for usingpresented in millions of euro, unless stated otherwise.

The consolidated financial statements comprise the equity method. Significant influence is presumed to exist where the Group holds at least 20%financial statements of share capital or voting rights.

Companies over which Veolia Environnement exercises joint controlSA and its subsidiaries. The financial statements of subsidiaries are drawn up for the same reference period as a resultthose of a contractual agreement between partners are consolidated using the proportionate methodparent company, from January 1, to December 31, 2009, in accordance with IAS 31.uniform accounting policies and methods.

Pursuant to SIC 12,Special Purpose Entities (SPEs)All inter-company balances and transactions, together with all income and expense items and unrealized gains and losses included in the net carrying amount of assets, resulting from internal transactions, are eliminated in full.

Subsidiaries are consolidated whenfrom the substancedate of acquisition, which is the date on which the Group obtains control, up to the date on which it ceases to exercise control.

Non-controlling interests represent the part of net income or loss and of net assets not held by the Group. They are presented in the Consolidated Income Statement, the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income and in equity in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, separately from equity attributable to the owners of the relationship between the SPE and Veolia Environnement or its subsidiaries indicates that the SPE is controlled by Veolia Environnement. Control may arise through the predetermination of the activities of the SPE or through the fact that, in substance, the financial and operating policies are defined by Veolia Environnement or Veolia Environnement benefits from most of the economic advantages and/or assumes most of the economic risks related to the activity of the SPE.Company.

Pursuant to IAS 27, potential voting rights available for exercise attached to financial instruments which, if exercised, would confer voting rights to Veolia Environnement and its subsidiaries, are taken into account where necessary in assessing the level of control or significant influence exercised.

1.4

Translation of foreign subsidiaries’ financial statements

Balance sheets, income statements and cash flow statements of subsidiaries whose functional currency is different from that of the Group are translated into the reporting currency at the applicable rate of exchange (i.e., the year-end rate for balance sheet items and the average annual rate for income statement and cash flow items). The foreign exchange translation are recorded in equity. The exchange rates of the major currencies of non-euro countries used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements were as follows:


Year-end exchange rate

(one foreign currency unit = €xx)

As of

December 31,

2007

As of

December 31,

2006

As of

December 31,

2005

U.S. Dollar

0.6793

0.7593

0.8477

Pound Sterling

1.3636

1.4892

1.4592

Czech Crown

0.0376

0.0364

0.0345

    

Average annual exchange rate

(one foreign currency unit = €xx)

Average annual rate

2007

Average annual rate

2006

Average annual rate

2005

U.S. Dollar

0.7248

0.7918

0.8078

Pound Sterling

1.4550

1.4665

1.4640

Czech Crown

0.0361

0.0354

0.0336


1.5

Foreign currency transactions

Foreign currency transactions are translated into euro at the exchange rate prevailing at the transaction date. At the year end, foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured in euro at year-end exchange rates. The resulting foreign exchange gains and losses are recorded in net income for the period.



F-10



Back to Contents


Loans to a subsidiary the settlement of which is neither planned nor probable in the foreseeable future represent, in substance, a portion of the Group’s net investment in this foreign operation. Foreign exchange gains and losses on monetary items forming part of a net investment are recognized directly in equity as foreign exchange translation adjustments and are released to income on the disposal of the net investment.

Exchange gains and losses on foreign currency-denominated borrowings or on foreign currency derivatives that qualify as hedges of net investments in foreign subsidiaries, are recognized directly in equity as foreign exchange translation adjustments. Amounts recognized in equity are released to income on the sale of the relevant investment.

Foreign currency-denominated non-monetary assets and liabilities recognized at historical cost are translated using the exchange rate prevailing as of the transaction date. Foreign currency-denominated non-monetary assets and liabilities recognized at fair value are translated using the exchange rate prevailing as of the date the fair value is determined.

In the case of a net investment in a foreign operation, foreign exchange gains or losses on loans denominated in a currency that is not the functional currency of the lending or borrowing company must be recognized in foreign exchange translation reserves. The impact on the Veolia Environnement consolidated financial statements is not material.

1.6

Property, plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment are recorded at historical acquisition cost to the Group, less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses.

Property, plant and equipment are recorded by component, with each component depreciated over its useful life.

Useful lives are as follows:


Range of useful lives in number of years *

Buildings

20 to 50

Technical systems

7 to 24

Vehicles

3 to 25

Other plant and equipment

3 to 12

* The range of useful lives is due to the diversity of property, plant and equipment concerned

Borrowing costs attributable to the acquisition or construction of identified installations, incurred during the construction period, are included in the cost of those assets in accordance with IAS 23,Borrowing costs.

A finance lease contract is a contract that transfers to the Group substantially all the risks and rewards related to the ownership of an asset.

Pursuant to IAS 17,Leases, assets financed by finance lease are recorded in property, plant and equipment at the present value of minimum lease payments less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses or, if lower, fair value and depreciated over the shorter of the lease term and the expected useful life of the assets, unless it is reasonably certain that the asset will become the property of the lessee at the end of the contract.

Given the nature of the Group's businesses, the subsidiaries do not own investment property in the normal course of their operations.



F-11



Back to Contents


1.7

Government grants

1.7.1

Investment grants for property, plant and equipment

In accordance with the option offered by IAS 20, investment grants are deducted from the gross carrying amount of property, plant and equipment to which they relate.

They are recognized as a reduction in the depreciation charge over the useful life of the depreciable asset.

When the construction of an asset covers more than one period, the portion of the grant not yet used is recorded in Other liabilities in the Balance Sheet.

1.7.2

Grants relating to concession arrangements

Grants received in respect of concession arrangements (see Note 1.20 for further details) are generally definitively earned and, therefore, are not repayable.

In accordance with the option offered by IAS 20, these grants are presented as a deduction from intangible assets or financial assets depending on the model adopted on the interpretation of the concession contract (IFRIC 12).

Under the intangible asset model, the grant reduces the amortization charge in respect of the concession intangible asset over the residual term of the concession contract.

Under the financial asset model, investment grants are equated to a means of repaying the operating financial asset.

1.7.3

Operating grants

Operating grants concern, by definition, operating items.

Where operating grants are intended to offset costs incurred, they are recognized as a deduction from the cost of goods sold over the period that matches them with related costs.

Where operating grants represent additional contractual remuneration of a recurring nature, such as contributions or compensation for inadequate revenue provided under certain public service delegation contracts, they are recognized in revenue.

1.8

Intangible assets excluding goodwill

Intangible assets are identifiable non-monetary assets without physical substance. They are recorded at acquisition cost less accumulated amortization and any accumulated impairment losses.

Intangible assets mainly consist of certain assets recognized in respect of concession arrangements (IFRIC 12), entry fees paid to local authorities for public service contracts, the value of contracts acquired through business combinations, patents, licenses, software and operating rights.

1.9

Business Combinations and Goodwill

Business combinations are recorded in accordance with the purchase accounting method as set out in IFRS 3. Under this method, assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed are recorded at fair value. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed, if any, is capitalized as goodwill.

Pursuant to IFRS, goodwill is not amortized.



F-12



Back to Contents


1.10

Impairment of assets

The Group performs impairment tests on intangible assets and property, plant and equipment if there is internal or external indication of impairment loss.

Veolia Environnement performs systematic annual impairment tests in respect of goodwill and other intangible assets with an indefinite useful life following the preparation of a long-term plan, or more frequently where there is an indication of decrease in value. In such cases, the long-term prospects of an activity are reviewed, a valuation is performed and an impairment is recorded in priority against goodwill in interim financial reporting if necessary.

The net carrying amount of an asset or group of assets is reduced to its recoverable amount (higher of the fair value less costs to sell and the value in use), where this is lower.

The value in use is determined by discounting the future cash flows expected to be derived from the asset, cash-generating unit (CGU) or group of CGUs considered, taking into account, where appropriate, the residual value, discounted using the discount rate determined for each asset, CGU or group of CGUs and corresponding to the risk-free rate plus a risk premium weighted for business-specific risks. Given the activities of the Group, cash-generating units generally correspond to a country in each Division.

Impairment losses can be reversed, with the exception of goodwill.

1.11

Inventories

In accordance with IAS 2, inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the estimated costs of completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale.

1.12

Assets classified as held for sale and Liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale, Discontinued operations

Assets classified as held for sale and liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale are stated at the lower of their net carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell.

The net income or loss realized by discontinued operations is reported on a separate line of the Income Statement.

1.13

Provisions

Pursuant to IAS 37, a provision is recorded when, at the year end, the Group has a current legal or implicit obligation to a third party as a result of a past event, and it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and the amount of the obligation can be reliably estimated.

As part of its obligations under public services contracts, the Group assumes responsibility for the maintenance and repair of installations of the publicly-owned utility networks it manages. The resulting maintenance and repair costs are analyzed in accordance with IAS 37 on provisions and, where necessary, a provision for contractual commitments is recorded where there is outstanding work to be performed.

In the event of a restructuring, an obligation exists if, prior to the period end, the restructuring has been announced and a detailed plan produced or implementation has commenced. Future operating costs are not provided.

In the case of provisions for restoration of waste storage facilities, Veolia Environnement accounts for the obligation to restore a site as waste is deposited, recording a non-current asset component and taking into account inflation and the date on which expenses will be incurred (discounting). The asset is amortized based on its depletion.

Provisions giving rise to an outflow after more than one year are discounted if the impact is material. Discount rates reflect current assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the liability. The unwinding of the discount is recorded in the Income Statement in "Other financial income and expenses".



F-13



Back to Contents


1.14

Financial instruments

The Group applied IFRS 7 on financial instrument disclosures for the first time.

1.14.1

Financial assets and liabilities

Financial assets include assets classified as available-for-sale and held-to maturity, assets at fair value through profit and loss, asset derivative instruments, loans and receivables and cash and cash equivalents.

Financial liabilities include borrowings, other financing and bank overdrafts, liability derivative instruments and operating payables.

The recognition and measurement of financial assets and liabilities is governed by IAS 39,Financial instruments: recognition and measurement.

1.14.2

Recognition and measurement of financial assets

Financial assets are initially recognized at fair value, net of transaction costs. In the case of assets measured at fair value through profit and loss, transaction costs are expensed directly to net income.

The Group classifies financial assets in one of the four categories identified by IAS 39 on the acquisition date:

Held-to-maturity assets

Held-to-maturity assets are financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturities, other than loans and receivables that the Group acquires with the positive intention and ability to hold to maturity. After initial recognition at fair value, held-to-maturity assets are recognized and measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.

Held-to-maturity assets are reviewed for objective evidence of impairment. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of the financial asset exceeds its recoverable amount, as estimated during impairment testing. The impairment loss is recognized in the Income Statement.

Net gains and losses on held-to-maturity assets consist of interest income and impairment losses.

Available-for-sale assets

Available-for-sale assets mainly consist of non-consolidated investments and marketable securities that do not qualify for inclusion in other financial asset categories. They are measured at fair value, with fair value movements recognized directly in equity, unless an impairment test leads to the recognition of an unrealized capital loss compared with the historical acquisition cost due to a material or long-term downturn in expected cash flows from the assets concerned. Where this is the case, the impairment loss is recognized in the Income Statement. Impairment reversals are recognized in the Income Statement for debt securities only (receivables and interest rate bonds).

Amounts recognized in equity are released to income on the sale of the relevant investment.  Fair value is equal to market value in the case of listed securities and an estimate of the value in use in the case of unlisted securities, determined based on financial criteria most appropriate to the specific situation of each security. Non-consolidated investments which are not listed on an active market and for which the fair value cannot be measured reliably, are recorded as a last resort by the Group at historical cost less any accumulated impairment losses.

Net gains and losses on available-for-sale assets consist of interest income, dividends, impairment losses and capital gains and losses on disposal.

Loans and receivables

This category includes loans to non-consolidated investments, operating financial assets, other loans and receivables and trade receivables. After initial recognition at fair value, these instruments are recognized and measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.



F-14



Back to Contents


An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of these assets exceeds the recoverable amount, as estimated during impairment tests, where there exists an indication of impairment. The impairment loss is recognized in the Income Statement.

The impairment of trade receivables is calculated using two methods:

a statistical method : this method is based on past losses and involves the application of a provision rate by category of aged receivables. The analysis is performed for a group of similar receivables, presenting similar credit characteristics as a result of belonging to a client category and country.

an individual method: the probability and amount of the loss is assessed on an individual case basis (past due period, other balance sheet positions with the counterparty, rating issued by an external rating agency, geographical location).

Net gains and losses on loans and receivables consist of interest income and impairment losses.

Assets and liabilities at fair value through profit and loss

This category includes:

trading assets and liabilities acquired by the Group for the purpose of selling them in the near term in order to realize a capital gain, which form part of a portfolio of identified financial instruments that are managed together and for which there is evidence of a recent actual pattern of short-term profit-taking. Derivative instruments not qualifying for hedge accounting are also considered trading assets and liabilities.

assets designated at fair value and primarily the portfolio of cash UCITS whose performance and management is based on fair value.

Changes in the value of these assets are recognized in the Income Statement.

Net gains and losses on assets at fair value through profit and loss consist of interest income, dividends, fair value adjustments and capital gains and losses on disposal.

Net gains and losses on derivatives entered into for trading purposes consist of flows exchanged and the change in the value of the instrument.

1.14.3

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash equivalents are held to meet short-term cash commitments. Cash and cash equivalents include all cash balances, deposits with a maturity of less than 3 months when initially recorded in the Balance Sheet, monetary UCITS and negotiable debt instruments. These investments can be converted into cash or sold in the very short term and do not present any material risk of loss in value. Cash equivalents are designated as assets at fair value through profit and loss.

Bank overdrafts repayable on demand which form an integral part of the Group's cash management policy represent a component of cash and cash equivalents for the purposes of the cash flow statement.

1.14.4

Recognition and measurement of financial liabilities

With the exception of trading liabilities and liability derivative instruments which are measured at fair value, borrowings and other financial liabilities are recognized initially at fair value less transaction costs and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.

The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments or receipts over the estimated term of the financial instrument or, where applicable, over a shorter period, to the net carrying amount of the financial asset or liability.

When the financial liability issued includes an embedded derivative which must be recognized separately, the amortized cost is calculated on the debt component only.  The amortized cost at the acquisition date is equal to the proceeds from the issue less the fair value of the embedded derivative.



F-15



Back to Contents


1.14.5

Minority interest put options

Pursuant to IAS 27, minority interests in fully consolidated subsidiaries are considered a component of equity.

Furthermore, in accordance with IAS 32, minority interest put options are considered as liabilities.

Pending an IFRIC interpretation or a specific IFRS, the Group has adopted the following treatment:

the present value of purchase commitments is recorded in borrowings in the Balance Sheet, through minority interests and where necessary goodwill for the residual balance.

gains or losses resulting from the unwinding of the discount on the liability are recorded in finance costs and, when the put exercise price varies, changes in the value of the instrument resulting from changes in valuation assumptions concerning the commitment are recorded in borrowings through goodwill.

If the minority interests have not been purchased on the expiry of the commitment, minority interests in equity are reconstituted through goodwill and the liability recognized in respect of the commitment (no longer necessary).

1.14.6

Recognition and measurement of derivative instruments

The Group uses various derivative instruments to manage its exposure to interest rate and foreign exchange risks resulting from its operating, financial and investment activities. Certain transactions performed in accordance with the Group interest rate and foreign exchange risk management policy do not satisfy hedge accounting criteria and are recorded as trading instruments.

Derivative instruments are recognized in the balance sheet at fair value. Other than the exceptions detailed below, changes in the fair value of derivative instruments are recorded through profit and loss. The fair value of derivatives is estimated using standard valuation models which take into account active market data.

Net gains and losses on instruments at fair value through profit and loss (trading instruments) consist of flows exchanged and the change in the value of the instrument.

Derivative instruments may be designated as hedges under one of three types of hedging relationship: fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or net investment hedge in a foreign operation:

a fair value hedge is a hedge of exposure to changes in fair value of a recognized asset or liability, or an identified portion of such an asset or liability, that is attributable to a particular risk (notably interest rate or foreign exchange risk), and could affect net income for the period.

a cash flow hedge is a hedge of exposure to variability in cash flows that is attributable to a particular risk associated with a recognized asset or liability or a highly probable forecast transaction (such as a planned purchase or sale) and could affect net income for the period.

the net investment hedge in a foreign operation hedges the exposure to foreign exchange risk of the net assets of a foreign operation including loans considered part of the investment (IAS 21).

An asset, liability, firm commitment, future cash-flow or net investment in a foreign operation qualifies for hedge accounting if:

the hedging relationship is precisely defined and documented at the inception date;

the effectiveness of the hedge is demonstrated at inception and by regular verification of the offsetting nature of movements in the market value of the hedging instrument and the hedged item. The ineffective portion of the hedge is systematically recognized in the Income Statement.



F-16



Back to Contents


The use of hedge accounting has the following consequences:

in the case of fair value hedges of existing assets and liabilities, the hedged portion of these items is measured at fair value in the Balance Sheet. The gain or loss on remeasurement is recognized in the Income Statement, where it is offset against matching gains or losses arising on the fair value remeasurement of the hedging financial instrument, to the extent it is effective;

in the case of cash flow hedges, the portion of the gain or loss on the fair value remeasurement of the hedging instrument that is determined to be an effective hedge is recognized directly in equity, while the gain or loss on the fair value remeasurement of the underlying item is not recognized in the balance sheet. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognized in the Income Statement. Gains or losses recognized in equity are released to the Income Statement in the same period or periods in which the asset acquired or liability issued impacts the Income Statement;

in the case of net investment hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognized in translation reserves in equity, while the ineffective portion is recognized in the Income Statement. Gains and losses recognized in foreign exchange translation reserves are released to the Income Statement when the foreign investment is sold.

1.14.7

Embedded derivatives

An embedded derivative is a component of a host contract that satisfies the definition of a derivative and whose economic characteristics are not closely related to that of the host contract. An embedded derivative must be separated from its host contract and accounted for as a derivative if, and only if, the following three conditions are satisfied:

the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative are not closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract;

the embedded derivative satisfies the definition of a derivative laid down in IAS 39; and

the hybrid instrument is not measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in the Income Statement.

1.14.8

Treasury shares

Treasury shares are deducted from equity.

Gains or losses arising on the sale of treasury shares and related dividends are recognized directly in equity and do not impact the Income Statement.

1.15

Pension plans and other post-employment benefits

Veolia Environnement and its subsidiaries have several pension plans. Pension obligations are calculated using the projected unit credit method. This method is based on the probability of personnel remaining with companies in the Group until retirement, the foreseeable changes in future compensation, and the appropriate discount rate. Specific discount rates are adopted for each monetary zone. This results in the recognition of pension-related assets or liabilities, and the recognition of the related net expenses.

Pursuant to IAS 19 revised, actuarial gains and losses are offset against equity and are not amortized in the Income Statement.

1.16

Share-based payments

Pursuant to IFRS 2,Share-based Payment, an expense is recorded in respect of share purchase or subscription plans and other share-based compensation granted by the Group to its employees. The fair value of these plans on the grant date is expensed in the Income Statement and recognized directly in equity in the period in which the benefit is vested and the service is rendered.



F-17



Back to Contents


The fair value of purchase and subscription options is calculated using the Black and Scholes model, taking into account the expected life of the options, the risk-free interest rate, observed volatility in the past and dividends expected on the shares.

The compensation expense in respect of employee savings plans is equal to the difference between the subscription price and the average share price at each subscription date, less a discount for non-transferability.

1.17

Revenue

Revenue represents sales of goods and services measured at the fair value of the counterparty received or receivable.

Revenue from the sale of goods or services is recognized when the following conditions are satisfied:

the amount of revenue can be measured reliably;

the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the goods have been transferred to the buyer;

the recovery of the counterparty is considered probable;

the costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the transaction can be measured reliably.

1.17.1

Sales of goods

Sales of goods mainly concern the sale of technological procedures and solutions relating to the treatment of water (drinking water and wastewater treatment) in the Water Division and sales of products related to recycling activities in the Environmental Services Division.

Revenue relating to these sales is recognized on physical delivery of the goods, which represents the transfer of the inherent risks of ownership of these goods.

1.17.2

Sales of services

The provision of services represents the majority of Group businesses such as the processing of waste, water distribution and related services, network operation and passenger transport and energy services (heat distribution, thermal services and public lighting).

Revenue from these activities is recognized when the service is rendered and it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to Group entities.

These activities involve the performance of a service agreed contractually (nature, price) with a public sector or industrial customer, within a set period. Billing is therefore based on the waste tonnage processed/ incinerated, the volume of water distributed, the thermal power delivered or the number of passengers transported, multiplied by the contractually agreed price.

Note that fees and taxes collected on behalf of local authorities are excluded from Revenue when there is no risk of payment default by third parties for the Group.

1.17.3

Construction contracts (excluding service concession arrangements)

Construction contracts primarily concern the design and construction of the infrastructures necessary for water treatment/distribution and wastewater treatment activities.

The related revenue is recognized in accordance with IAS 11 (see Note 1.22).



F-18



Back to Contents


1.17.4

IFRIC 4 Contracts

Contracts falling within the scope of IFRIC 4 (see Note 1.21) involve services generally rendered to industrial/private customers. All service components to which the parties have agreed are detailed in contracts such as BOT (Build Operate Transfer) contracts.

Services include the financing of the construction of a specific asset/installation on behalf of the customer and the operation of the asset concerned.

Revenue relating to the construction of the asset is recognized in accordance with the provisions of IAS 11 and the asset is recorded in operating financial assets. Revenue is recognized on a completion basis at each period end, based on actual and expected costs.

The financing of construction work involves finance costs that are invoiced to the customer and recognized in Revenue, under Revenues from operating financial assets. This interest is recognized in Revenue from the start of construction work and represents remuneration received by the builder/lender.

Revenue relating to the operation of the asset is recognized on delivery of the goods or performance of the service depending on the operating activity.

1.17.5

Service Concession arrangements (IFRIC 12)

See Note 1.20 on Service concession arrangements.

1.18

Financial items in the Income Statement

Finance costs consist of interest payable on borrowings calculated using the amortized cost method and losses on interest rate derivatives, both qualifying and not qualifying as hedges.

Interest costs included in payments under lease finance contracts are recorded using the effective interest method.

Finance income consists of gains on interest rate derivatives, whether qualifying or not qualifying as hedges and income from cash investments and equivalents.

Interest income is recognized in the income statement when earned, using the amortized cost method.

Other financial income and expenses notably include income on financial receivables calculated using the amortized cost method, dividends, foreign exchange gains and losses, impairment losses on financial assets and the unwinding of discounts on provisions.  

1.19

Income taxes

The income tax expense (credit) includes the current tax charge (credit) and the deferred tax charge (credit).

Deferred tax assets are recognized on deductible temporary differences, tax loss carry forwards and/or tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax liabilities are recognized on taxable temporary differences.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in prevailing tax laws and rates at the year end. Deferred tax balances are not discounted.

A deferred tax asset is recognized to the extent that the Group is likely to generate sufficient future taxable profits against which the asset can be offset. Deferred tax assets are impaired to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available.



F-19



Back to Contents


1.20

Description of Group concession activities

In the course of its business, Veolia Environnement provides collective services (distribution of drinking water and heating, passenger transport network, household waste collection, etc.) to local authorities in return for a remuneration based on services rendered.

These collective services (also known as services of general interest or general economic interest or public services) are generally managed by Veolia Environnement under contracts entered into at the request of public bodies which retain control thereof.

Concession arrangements involve the transfer of operating rights for a limited period, under the control of the local authority, using dedicated installations built by Veolia Environnement, or made available to it for a fee or nil consideration:

These contracts define "public service obligations" in return for remuneration. The remuneration is based on operating conditions, continuity of service, price rules and obligations with respect to the maintenance/replacement of installations. The contract determines the conditions for the transfer of installations to the local authority or a successor at its term.

Veolia Environnement can, in certain cases, be responsible for a given service as it holds the service support network (water/heat distribution network, water treatment network). Such situations are the result of full or partial privatizations. Provisions impose public service obligations and the means by which the local authority may recover control of the concession holder.

These contracts generally include price review clauses. These clauses are mainly based on cost trends, inflation, changes in tax and/or other legislation and occasionally on changes in volumes and/or the occurrence of specific events changing the profitability of the contract.

In addition, the Group generally assumes a contractual obligation to maintain and repair facilities managed under public service contracts. The resulting maintenance and repair costs are analyzed in accordance with IAS 37 on provisions and, where necessary, a provision for contractual commitments is recorded where there is outstanding work to be performed.

The nature and extent of the Group’s rights and obligations under these different contracts differ according to the public services rendered by the different Group divisions.

The accounting treatment is disclosed in Notes 1.20, 5 and 10.

Water:

Veolia Environnement manages municipal drinking water and/or waste water services. These services encompass all or part of the water cycle (extraction from natural sources, treatment, storage and distribution followed by collection and treatment of waste water and release into the environment).

In France, these services are primarily rendered under public service delegation “affermage” contracts with a term of 8 to 20 years. They concern the distribution of drinking water and/or the collection and treatment of waste water. They use specific assets, such as distribution or wastewater treatment networks and drinking water or wastewater treatment plants, which are generally provided by the concession grantor and returned to it at the end of the contract.

Abroad, Veolia Environnement renders its services under contracts which reflect local legislation, the economic situation of the country and the investment needs of each partner.

These contracts are generally concession arrangements, service contracts or O&M (Operate & Manage) and BOT contracts with an average term of between 7 and 40 years, and sometimes longer.

Contracts can also be entered into with public entities in which Veolia Environnement purchased an interest on their partial privatization. The profitability of these contracts is not fundamentally different from other contracts, but operations are based on a partnership agreement with the local authority.



F-20



Back to Contents


Environmental Services:

Both in France and abroad, the main concession arrangements entered into by Veolia Environnement concern the treatment and recovery of waste in sorting units, storage and incineration. These contracts have an average term of 18 to 30 years.

Energy Services:

Veolia Environnement has developed a range of energy management activities: heating and cooling networks, thermal and multi-technical services, industrial utilities, installation and maintenance of production equipment, integration services for the comprehensive management of buildings and electrical services on public roadways.

The main contracts concern the management of heating and air-conditioning networks under urban concessions or on behalf of local authorities.

In Eastern Europe, Veolia Environnement’s Energy Services Division provides services under mixed partial privatizations or through public-private partnerships with local authorities responsible for the production and distribution of thermal energy.

Transportation:

Veolia Environnement’s Transportation Division provides passenger transport services on behalf of local, regional and national public authorities.

Veolia Environnement primarily provides these services in France and abroad under service contracts comprising public service obligations (as per EU terminology), with terms of 7 to 15 years.

Accounting for service concession agreements

Concession agreements are recognized since fiscal year 2006 in accordance with IFRIC12, Service Concession Agreement, published in November 2006, as Veolia Environnement elected for the early adoption of this interpretation as the preferred method. This interpretation is of mandatory application for periods beginning on or after January 1, 2008. The change in accounting method was applied retrospectively in accordance with IAS 8 on changes in accounting method. As such, the Veolia Environnement consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005 were adjusted for the retrospective application of IFRIC 12. IFRIC 12 is currently in the process of being approved at the European level.

A substantial portion of the Group's assets is used within the framework of concession or affermage contract granted by public sector customers ("grantors") and/or by concession companies purchased by the Group on full or partial privatization. The characteristics of these contracts vary significantly depending on the country and activity concerned.

Nonetheless, they generally provide, directly or indirectly, for customer involvement in the determination of the service and its remuneration, and the return of the assets necessary to the performance of the service at the end of the contract.

IFRIC 12 is applicable to concession arrangements comprising a public service obligation and satisfying all of the following criteria:

the concession grantor controls or regulates the services to be provided by the operator using the asset, the infrastructure, the beneficiaries of the services and prices applied;

the grantor controls the significant residual interest in the infrastructure at the end of the term of the arrangement.

Pursuant to IFRIC 12, such infrastructures are not recognized in assets of the operator as property, plant and equipment but in financial assets ("financial asset model") and/or intangible assets ("intangible asset model") depending on the remuneration commitments given by the grantor.

1.20.1

“Financial asset model”

The financial asset model applies when the operator has an unconditional right to receive cash or another financial asset from the grantor.



F-21



Back to Contents


In the case of concession services, the operator has such an unconditional right if the grantor contractually guarantees the payment of:

amounts specified or determined in the contract or

the shortfall, if any, between amounts received from users of the public service and amounts specified or determined in the contract.

Financial assets resulting from the application of IFRIC 12 are recorded in the Balance Sheet under the heading "Operating financial assets" and recognized at amortized cost.

Unless otherwise indicated in the contract, the effective interest rate is equal to the weighted average cost of capital of the entities carrying the assets concerned.

Pursuant to IAS 39, an impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of these assets exceeds the recoverable amount, as estimated during impairment tests. Fair value is estimated based on the recoverable amount, calculated by discounting future cash flows (value in use method).

The portion falling due within less than one year is presented in "Current operating financial assets", while the portion falling due within more than one year is presented in the non-current heading.

Revenue associated with this financial model includes:

revenue determined on a completion basis in the case of construction operating financial assets (in accordance with IAS 11);

the remuneration of the operating financial asset recorded in Revenue from operating financial assets (excluding principal payments);

service remuneration.

1.20.2

“Intangible asset model”

The intangible asset model applies where the operator is paid by the users or where the concession grantor has not provided a contractual guarantee in respect of the recoverable amount. The intangible asset corresponds to the right granted by the concession grantor to the operator to charge users of the public service.

Intangible assets resulting from the application of IFRIC 12 are recorded in the Balance Sheet under the heading "Concession intangible assets" and are amortized, generally on a straight-line basis, over the contract term. However, fees paid to local authorities that are an integral part of the cost of the intangible asset are disclosed under the heading "Other intangible assets".

Under the intangible asset model, Revenue includes:

revenue recorded on a completion basis, in the case of construction operating financial assets (in accordance with IAS 11).

service remuneration.

1.20.3

“Mixed or bifurcation model”

The choice of the financial asset or intangible asset model depends on the existence of payment guarantees granted by the concession grantor.  

However, certain contracts may include a payment commitment on the part of the concession grantor covering only part of the investment, with the balance covered by royalties charged to users.

Where this is the case, the investment amount guaranteed by the concession grantor is recognized under the financial asset model and the residual balance is recognized under the intangible asset model.



F-22



Back to Contents


1.21

Finance leases

IFRIC 4 seeks to identify the contractual terms and conditions of agreements which, without taking the legal form of a lease, convey a right to use a group of assets in return for payments included in the overall contract remuneration. It identifies in such agreements a lease contract which is then analyzed and accounted for in accordance with the criteria laid down in IAS 17, based on the allocation of the risks and rewards of ownership.

The contract operator therefore becomes the lessor vis-à-vis its customers. Where the lease transfers the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset in accordance with IAS 17 criteria, the operator recognizes a financial asset to reflect the corresponding financing, rather than an item of property, plant and equipment.

These financial assets are recorded in the Balance Sheet under the heading "Operating financial assets". They are initially recorded at the lower of fair value and total future flows and subsequently at amortized cost using the effective interest rate of the contract.

The portion falling due within less than one year is presented in "Current operating financial assets", while the portion falling due within more than one year is presented in the non-current heading.

Contracts falling within the scope of IFRIC 4 are either outsourcing contracts with industrial customers, BOT (Build Operate Transfer) contracts, or incineration or cogeneration contracts under which, notably, demand or volume risk is, in substance, transferred to the prime contractor.

During the construction phase, a financial receivable is recognized in the balance sheet and revenue in the Income Statement, in accordance with the percentage completion method laid down in IAS 11 for construction contracts.

The financial receivables resulting from this analysis are initially measured at the fair value of lease payments and then amortized using the effective interest method.

After a review of the contract and its financing, the implied interest rate on the financial receivable is based on either the Group financing rate and /or the borrowing rate associated with the contract.

1.22

Construction contracts

Veolia Environnement recognizes income and expenses associated with construction contracts in accordance with the percentage of completion method defined in IAS 11.

These contracts are entered into with local authorities or private partners for the construction of infrastructures. They are generally fixed-price contracts as defined by IAS 11.

Revenue generated by construction services rendered by the Group is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable, where total income and expenses associated with the construction contract and the stage of completion can be determined reliably.

The percentage of completion is determined by comparing costs incurred as of the balance sheet date with total estimated costs under the contract. Costs incurred are recognized as production cost and do not include either administrative or selling costs.

Where total contract costs exceed total contract revenue, the expected loss is recognized as an expense immediately via a provision for losses to completion, irrespective of the stage of completion and based on a best estimate of forecast results including, where appropriate, rights to additional income or compensation, where they are probable and can be determined reliably. Provisions for losses to completion are recorded as liabilities in the Balance Sheet.

Partial payments received under construction contracts before the corresponding work has been performed, are recognized in liabilities in the Balance Sheet under advances and down-payments received.



F-23



Back to Contents


The amount of costs incurred, plus profits and less losses recognized (notably in provisions for losses to completion) and intermediary billings is determined on an individual contract basis. Where positive, this amount is recognized in assets in "amounts due from customers for construction contract work". Where negative, it is recognized in liabilities in "amounts due to customers for construction contract work".

1.23

Electricity purchase and sale contracts

Incidentally to their operations, certain Veolia Environnement subsidiaries are required to purchase or sell electricity on the market, in order to manage supplies and optimize costs.

Revenue

After analysis of contractual terms and conditions, income from trading activity transactions is recognized in "Revenue", for the related margin.

Financial instruments

Certain subsidiaries enter into electricity transactions (forward contracts, options) which are recognized as derivative financial instruments in accordance with IAS 39.

Application scope of IAS 39

Options and forward purchase and sale contracts with physical delivery are excluded from the application scope of IAS 39 if entered into for own use (exception for own-use).

This exception is applicable when the following conditions are satisfied:

The volumes purchased or sold under the contracts reflect the operating requirements of the subsidiary;

The contracts are not subject to net settlement as defined by IAS 39 and, in particular, physical delivery is systematic;

The contracts are not equivalent to sales of options, as defined by IAS 39.

Recognition and measurement of instruments falling within the application scope of IAS 39

Instruments falling within the application scope of IAS 39 are derivative instruments and are measured at fair value, calculated using models generally based on observable data. Fair value movements are recorded in operating income. The net impact of the unwinding of these transactions is recorded in revenue (see Note 30).

1.24

Greenhouse gas emission rights

Pursuant to the Kyoto Protocol, the Group has undertaken to reduce the level of greenhouse gases emitted by energy production installations which it manages.

In this respect, the Group received a certain number of free emission rights for an initial so-called pre-Kyoto period 2005-2007 and then for a second period 2008-2012 and must satisfy annual obligations to surrender rights equal to total actual emissions.

In the absence of specific IFRS provisions, the Group has adopted the "net liability approach".

This approach involves the recognition of a liability, in accordance with IAS 37 principles, corresponding to amounts that will have to be disbursed to meet surrender obligations at the end of the three-year period, should emission rights be insufficient to cover actual emissions during the period.

The liability is assessed based on emissions during the period, rights held and the market price at the period end (or the forward price in the case of forward purchases). This liability is subsequently reversed when surrender obligations are satisfied and purchases of emission rights are recorded in operating expenses.

Allowances received are treated on grant as entitlement to repayment of a commitment received for nil consideration. They are recorded as intangible assets with nil value (IAS 38). In the event of surplus rights, income from the sale of such rights is recorded as a reduction in cost of sales.



F-24



Back to Contents


Emission rights purchased on the market for surrender to Member States where rights held are insufficient to cover actual emissions, are recorded in the balance sheet at acquisition cost. An impairment loss is recognized at the period end if the market value is less than the acquisition cost.

Furthermore, allowances purchased for resale on the market are recorded in inventories and remeasured based on the market price at the period end, in accordance with the options available under IAS 2 for trading inventories.

1.25

Segment reporting  

Pursuant to IAS 14, Veolia Environnement provides primary information by business segment and secondary information by geographical area. The business segments are Water, Environmental Services, Energy Services and Transportation.

1.26

Standards and interpretations not adopted early

Veolia Environnement has not elected for early adoption of the following standards and interpretations:

IAS 1, revised,Presentation of Financial Statements, applicable

Pursuant to the Grouprevised standard, the “Balance sheet” is now known as the “Consolidated Statement of Financial Position” and the changes resulting from Januarytransactions with owners of the Company acting in this capacity are presented separately from transactions with non-controlling interests in the Statement of Changes in Equity, which is now presented with the financial statements.

IFRIC 18,Transfers of assets from Customers

IFRIC 18,Transfers of Assets from Customers, is applicable from July 1, 2009 but was not adopted by the European Union until December 1, 2009. The interpretation is of prospective applicability and the Group did not elect for early adoption.

The interpretation covers situations where a customer transfers an asset to a supplier at the beginning of a contract, which the supplier must then use for the supply of goods or services. This interpretation also applies to cash transferred by a customer to finance the acquisition or construction of assets by the supplier to be used for the supply of goods or services. Contracts and services covered by the provisions of IFRIC 12 are specifically excluded from the scope of this interpretation.

Within the Group, this interpretation is likely to impact the Water and Energy Services Divisions. The Group has allocated the necessary resources to analyze the contracts signed since July 1, 2009, likely to fall within the application scope of IFRIC 18.



F-11



Back to Contents


IAS 23 Revised,Borrowing Costs

Amendments to IAS 32 and IAS 1,Financial Instruments – Presentation: puttable financial instruments and obligations arising on liquidation

Amendments to IFRS 8,Operating Segments, applicable1 and IAS 27 relating to the Groupcost of an investment on first-time adoption of IAS/IFRS

Amendment to IFRS 2,Share-based Paymentvesting conditions and cancellations

Amendments arising from January 1, 2009.the 2006-2008 annual improvement process, with the exception of the amendments to IFRS 5

Amendment to IFRS 7,Financial Instruments: DisclosuresImprovements to Financial Instrument Disclosures

Amendment to IAS 39 and IFRIC 11,IFRS2 - Group and treasury share transactions, applicable9 relating to the Group from January 1, 2008.

embedded derivatives

IFRIC 13,Customer Loyalty Programmes, applicable to the Group from January 1, 2009 but not relevant to the Group.

IFRIC 14,15,IAS 19—The Limit onAgreements for the Construction of Real Estate

IFRIC 16,Hedges of a Defined Benefit Asset, Minimum Funding Requirements and their InteractionNet Investment in a Foreign Operation, applicable to the Group from January 1, 2008.

Veolia Environnement does not expect implementationImplementation of these standards and interpretations todid not have a material impact.

1.1.3

IAS 23 revised,Borrowing costsTexts which enter into mandatory effect after December 31, 2009 and which have not been adopted early, applicable to the Group from January 1, 2009.

Veolia Environnement doeshas not expect implementationelected for early adoption of thisthe following standards, standard amendments and interpretations published as of December 31, 2009 (adopted or in the course of being adopted by the European Union):

IFRS 3 Revised,Business Combinations

Amendment to IAS 27,Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements

The application of IFRS 3 Revised and IAS 27 Revised is likely to have a material impact in so far ason future business combinations or transactions with non-controlling interests.

Amendments resulting from the 2007-2009 annual improvement process (not adopted by the European Union).

Pursuant to the new amendment specifying the conditions for implementing IAS 7, the Group has elected to capitalize borrowing costs.

IFRS 3 revised,Business combinations, applicable towill eliminate the Groupreplacement costs detailed in Note 19, Operating income, from “Net cash from operating activities” in the Consolidated Cash Flow Statement, from January 1, 2010.

Consequently, when adjusting “Net income attributable to owners of the Company” to obtain “Net cash from operating activities”, replacement costs will no longer be eliminated under “Operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses.” This amendment has no impact on net income or equity.

Amendments to IAS 28 and IAS 31 subsequent to IFRS 3 revised

IAS 24 Revised,Related Party Disclosures (not adopted by the European Union)

Amendment to IAS 32,Financial Instruments: Disclosures: Classification of rights issues

Amendment to IAS 39,Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement:Eligible Hedged Items

Amendment to IFRS 2,Share-based Payment - Group cash-settled share-based payment transactions, (not adopted by the European Union)



F-12



Back to Contents


Amendment to IFRS 5 resulting from the 2006-2008 annual improvement process

IFRIC 17, Distribution of Non-cash Assets to Owners

IFRIC 19,Extinguishing Financial Liabilities with Equity Instruments (not adopted by the European Union)

Amendment to IFRIC 14,Prepayments of a Minimum Funding Requirement(not adopted by the European Union)

IFRS 9,Financial Instruments, Classification and Measurement (not adopted by the European Union)

Subject to their definitive adoption by the European Union, these standards, standard amendments and interpretations are of mandatory application from July 1, 2009 or later, that is from January 1, 2010 or later for the Group. The Group is currently assessing the potential impact of the first-time application of these new texts.

1.2

General principles underlying the preparation of the financial statements

The accounting methods presented below have been applied consistently for all periods presented in the consolidated financial statements.

The consolidated financial statements are presented on the basis of historical cost, with the exception of assets and liabilities recognized at fair value: derivatives, financial instruments held for trading, financial instruments designated at fair value and available-for-sale financial instruments (in accordance with IAS 32 and IAS 39).

The Veolia Environnement consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 were adopted by the Board of Directors on March 24, 2010 and will be presented for approval to the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders on May 7, 2010.

1.3

Basis of presentation as of December 31, 2009

The consolidated financial statements are presented in millions of euro, unless stated otherwise.

The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of Veolia Environnement SA and its subsidiaries. The financial statements of subsidiaries are drawn up for the same reference period as those of the parent company, from January 1, to December 31, 2009, in accordance with uniform accounting policies and methods.

All inter-company balances and transactions, together with all income and expense items and unrealized gains and losses included in the net carrying amount of assets, resulting from internal transactions, are eliminated in full.

Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date of acquisition, which is the date on which the Group obtains control, up to the date on which it ceases to exercise control.

Non-controlling interests represent the part of net income or loss and of net assets not held by the Group. They are presented in the Consolidated Income Statement, the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income and in equity in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, separately from equity attributable to the owners of the Company.

1.4

Principles of Consolidation

Veolia Environnement fully consolidates all entities over which it exercises control. Control is defined as the ability to govern, directly or indirectly, the financial and operating policies of an entity in order to obtain the benefit of its activities.

Pursuant to the provisions of IAS 28, Investments in Associates, Veolia Environnement accounts for associates using the equity method where it exercises significant influence over financial and operating policies. Significant influence is presumed to exist where the Group holds at least 20% of share capital or voting rights.

Companies over which Veolia Environnement exercises joint control as a result of a contractual agreement between partners are consolidated using the proportionate method in accordance with IAS 31, Interests in Joint Ventures.



F-13



Back to Contents


Pursuant to SIC 12, Consolidation - Special Purpose Entities, special-purpose entities (SPEs) are consolidated when the substance of the relationship between the SPE and Veolia Environnement or its subsidiaries indicates that the SPE is controlled by Veolia Environnement. Control may arise through the predetermination of the activities of the SPE or through the fact that, in substance, the financial and operating policies are defined by Veolia Environnement or Veolia Environnement benefits from most of the economic advantages and/or assumes most of the economic risks related to the activity of the SPE.

Pursuant to IAS 27, revised,Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements, applicablepotential voting rights available for exercise attached to financial instruments which, if exercised, would confer voting rights on Veolia Environnement and its subsidiaries, are taken into account where necessary in assessing the Group from January 1, 2010.

IFRS 2 amendment,Share-Based Payment – Vesting Conditions and Cancellations, applicable to the Group from January 1, 2009.

Amendment to IAS 32 – IAS 1,Financial Instruments – Presentation: Financial instruments puttable at fair value and obligations arising on liquidation, applicable to the Group from January 1, 2009.

These standards were published at the beginninglevel of January 2008 and the Group is currently studying their potential impact.control or significant influence exercised.

1.271.5

Fair value determination principlesTranslation of foreign subsidiaries’ financial statements

Balance sheets, income statements and cash flow statements of subsidiaries whose functional currency is different from the presentation currency of the Group are translated into the presentation currency at the applicable rate of exchange (i.e. the year-end rate for balance sheet items and the average annual rate for income statement and cash flow items). Foreign exchange translation gains and losses are recorded in other comprehensive income in equity. The fair valueexchange rates of allthe major currencies of non-euro countries used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements were as follows:

Year end exchange rate

(one foreign currency unit = €xx)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31, 2007

U.S. Dollar

0.6942

0.7185

0.6793

Pound Sterling

1.1260

1.0499

1.3636

Czech Crown

0.0378

0.0372

0.0376

    

Average annual exchange rate

(one foreign currency unit = €xx)

Average
annual rate 2009

Average
annual rate 2008

Average
annual rate 2007

U.S. Dollar

0.7177

0.6782

0.7248

Pound Sterling

1.1222

1.2433

1.4550

Czech Crown

0.0378

0.0399

0.0361


1.6

Foreign currency transactions

Foreign currency transactions are translated into euro at the exchange rate prevailing at the transaction date. At the year end, foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured in euro at year-end exchange rates. The resulting foreign exchange gains and losses are recorded in net income for the period.

Loans to a foreign subsidiary the settlement of which is determined at the balance sheet date, either for recognitionneither planned nor probable in the accounts or disclosureforeseeable future represent, in substance, a portion of the notesGroup’s net investment in this foreign operation. Foreign exchange gains and losses on monetary items forming part of a net investment are recognized directly in other comprehensive income in foreign exchange translation adjustments and are released to income on the disposal of the net investment. The impact on the Veolia Environnement financial statements (see Note 31).is not material.

TheExchange gains and losses on foreign currency-denominated borrowings or on currency derivatives that qualify as hedges of a net investment in a foreign operation, are recognized directly in other comprehensive income as foreign exchange translation adjustments. Amounts recognized in other comprehensive income are released to income on the sale date of the relevant investment.

Foreign currency-denominated non-monetary assets and liabilities recognized at historical cost are translated using the exchange rate prevailing as of the transaction date. Foreign currency-denominated non-monetary assets and liabilities recognized at fair value are translated using the exchange rate prevailing as of the date the fair value is determined:determined.

based on quoted prices in an active market, or

using internal valuation techniques involving standard mathematical calculation methods integrating observable market data (forward rates, interest rate curves, etc.), or

using internal valuation techniques integrating parameters estimated by the Group in the absence of observable market data.



F-25F-14



Back to Contents


Quoted prices1.7

Property, plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment are recorded at historical acquisition cost to the Group, less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses.

Property, plant and equipment are recorded by component, with each component depreciated over its useful life.

Useful lives are as follows:

Range of useful lives in number of years *

Buildings

20 to 50

Technical systems

7 to 24

Vehicles

3 to 25

Other plant and equipment

3 to 12


*

The range of useful lives is due to the diversity of property, plant and equipment concerned


Borrowing costs attributable to the acquisition or construction of identified installations, incurred during the construction period, are included in the cost of those assets in accordance with IAS 23,Borrowing costs.

A finance lease contract is a contract that transfers to the Group substantially all the risks and rewards related to the ownership of an activeasset.

Pursuant to IAS 17, Leases, assets financed by finance lease are initially recorded in property, plant and equipment at the lower of fair value and the present value of future minimum lease payments. Subsequently, these assets are recognized at the lower of the present value of minimum lease payments less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses, and market value, and depreciated over the shorter of the lease term and the expected useful life of the assets, unless it is reasonably certain that the asset will become the property of the lessee at the end of the contract.

Given the nature of the Group’s businesses, the subsidiaries do not own investment property in the normal course of their operations.

1.8

Government grants

1.8.1

Investment grants for property, plant and equipment

In accordance with the option offered by IAS 20,Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance, investment grants are deducted from the gross carrying amount of property, plant and equipment to which they relate.

They are recognized as a reduction in the depreciation charge over the useful life of the depreciable asset.

When quoted prices inthe construction of an active market are available they are adopted in priority forasset covers more than one period, the determinationportion of the market value. Marketable securities and certain quoted bond issues are valuedgrant not yet used is recorded in this way.“Other liabilities” in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

1.8.2

Fair values determined using models integrating observable market data

The majority of derivative financial instruments (swaps, caps, floors, etc.) are traded over the counter and, as such, there are no quoted prices. Valuations are therefore determined using models commonly used by market participantsGrants relating to value such financial instruments.concession arrangements

Valuations calculated internallyGrants received in respect of derivative instrumentsconcession arrangements (see Note 1.21 for further details) are tested every six months for consistencygenerally definitively earned and, therefore, are not repayable.

In accordance with valuations issuedthe option offered by our counterparties.IAS 20, these grants are presented as a deduction from intangible assets or financial assets depending on the applicable model following an analysis of each concession arrangement (IFRIC 12).

The fair value of unquoted borrowings is calculated by discounting contractual flows atUnder the market rate of interest.

 The net carrying amount of receivables and payables falling due within less than one year and certain floating-rate receivables and payables is considered a reasonable estimate of their fair value, due tointangible asset model, the short payment and settlement periods applied bygrant reduces the Veolia Group.

The fair value of fixed-rate loans and receivables depends on movementsamortization charge in interest rates and the credit riskrespect of the counterparty.concession intangible asset over the residual term of the concession arrangement.

Valuations produced by these modelsUnder the financial asset model, investment grants are adjustedequated to take accounta means of changes in Veolia Group credit risk.repaying the operating financial asset.



Fair values determined using models integrating certain non-observable data

Derivative instruments valued using internal models integrating certain non-observable data include certain electricity derivative instruments for which there are no quoted prices in an active market (notably for electricity purchase options with extremely long maturity) or observable market data (forward prices for component materials, interest-rate curves, etc.), in particular for distant maturities.



F-26F-15



Back to Contents



1.8.3

Operating grants

Operating grants concern, by definition, operating items.

Where operating grants are intended to offset costs incurred, they are recognized as a deduction from the cost of goods sold over the period that matches them with related costs.

Where operating grants represent additional contractual remuneration of a recurring nature, such as contributions or compensation for inadequate revenue provided under certain public service delegation contracts, they are recognized in revenue.

1.9

Intangible assets excluding goodwill

Intangible assets are identifiable non-monetary assets without physical substance. They are recorded at acquisition cost less accumulated amortization and any accumulated impairment losses.

Intangible assets mainly consist of certain assets recognized in respect of concession arrangements (IFRIC 12), entry fees paid to local authorities for public service contracts, the value of contracts acquired through business combinations, patents, licenses, software and operating rights.

NOTE 2.1.10

Use of management estimatesBusiness combinations and goodwill

Business combinations are recorded in accordance with the application of Grouppurchase accounting standards

The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts ofmethod as set out in IFRS 3. Under this method, assets liabilities, revenue and expenses, and the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Future results may be different from these estimates.

Underlying estimates and assumptions are determined based on past experience and other factors considered as reasonable given the circumstances. They act as a basis for making judgments necessary to the determination of the carrying amount of assetsacquired and liabilities which cannot be obtained directly from other sources. Future values could differ from these estimates.and contingent liabilities assumed are recorded at fair value.

Underlying estimates and assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. The impact of changes in accounting estimates is recognized inGoodwill represents the period the change is made if it affects this period only and in the period the change is made and prior periods if they are also affected by the change.

Notes 1.9 and 4 on goodwill and business combinations present the method adopted for the allocationexcess of the purchase price onover the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed, if any. It is valued in the functional currency and recognized in assets in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

Pursuant to IFRS, goodwill is not amortized but is subject to impairment tests performed annually or more frequently where there is evidence calling into question the net carrying amount.

Where the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed, if any, exceeds the purchase price, “negative goodwill” is immediately recognized in net income.

Treatment of costs directly attributable to acquisitions incurred during 2009 and concerning acquisitions to be completed after January 1, 2010:

Costs directly attributable to business combinations. This allocation is based on future cash flow assumptionscombinations incurred during 2009, and discount rates.

Notes 1.10, 4 and 6 concern goodwill and non-current asset impairment tests. Group management performed tests based on best forecasts of future cash flows of the activities of the cash-generating units concerned and taking into account discount rates.

Note 1.27 describes the principles adoptedrelating to acquisitions to be completed during fiscal year 2010, were expensed in net operating income for the determination of financial instrument fair values.

Note 30 on derivative instruments describes the accounting treatment of derivative instruments. Veolia Environnement valued these derivative instruments, allocated them and tested their effectiveness where necessary.

Notes 17 and 32 on provisions and employee commitments detail the provisions recognized by Veolia Environnement. Veolia Environnement determined these provisions based on best estimates of these obligations.

Note 25 on the income tax expense presents the tax position of the Group and is notably based in France and in the United States on best estimates available to the Group of trends in future tax results.

All these estimates are based on organized procedures for the collection of forecast information on future flows, validated by operating management, and on expected market data based on external indicators and used in accordance with consistent and documented methodologies.



F-27



Back to Contents



NOTE 3.

Significant events


On April 27, 2007, Veolia Environnement announced the signature of an agreement with The Blackstone Group and Apax Partners for the acquisition of Sulo. This acquisition for an enterprise value of €1,450 million (including borrowings) was finalized on July 2, 2007.

On May 31, 2007, the Environmental Services Division announced the signature of an agreement to acquire control of the Italian company VSA Tecnitalia (formerly TMT), a subsidiary of Termomeccanica Ecologica specializing in waste management and treatment. The transaction concerned 75% of the share capital based on an enterprise value (100%) of €338 million. The stake may be raised to 100% by 2012. The acquisition was finalized on October 3, 2007.

On June 12, 2007, the Energy Services Division signed an agreement to acquire the private company Thermal North America, Inc., the largest portfolio of heating and cooling networks in the United States, for an enterprise value of U.S.$788 million. Through this transaction, Veolia Environnement became a leading player in the number one energy services market worldwide, at a time when rising energy prices and changes in environmental regulations in the United States are likely to generate new opportunities. The acquisition was finalized on December 12, 2007.

On June 27, 2007, the subscription period for the share capital increase with retention of preferential subscription rights in the amount of €2.6 billion, announced by Veolia Environnement on June 12 2007, closed on July 10, 2007 with success. The gross amount of the share capital increase was €2,581,469,688 (including additional paid-in capital), following the issue of 51,941,040 new shares with a par value of €5 each.

On August 9, 2007, the Water Division signed an agreement to acquire the non-regulated activities of Thames Water in the United Kingdom for an enterprise value of €233 million. The acquisition was finalized on November 28, 2007.

On August 31, 2007, the Transportation Division sold its activities in Denmark.

On November 9, 2007, the Transportation Division sold its activities in Spain, with the exception of certain contracts.

On November 19, 2007, Veolia Environnement opened up the share capital of its subsidiary Veolia Voda, in charge of water activities in Central and Eastern Europe, to the EBRD, further extending its partnership with this institution. Following this transaction performed by way of a share capital increase, Veolia Environnement held 90% of Veolia Voda.

On December 24, 2007, Société Financière Internationale (SFI) and Société de Promotion et de Participation pour la Coopération Economique (PROPARCO) acquired a 19.45% stake in Veolia Water AMI, which manages water activities in the Africa, Middle East zone and the Indian sub-continent. Following this transaction, Veolia Environnement held 80.55% of Veolia Water AMI.




F-28



Back to Contents



year.

NOTE 4.1.11

Impairment of intangible assets, property, plant and equipment and non-financial assets

The net carrying amount of non-financial assets, other than inventory and deferred tax assets, is reviewed at each period-end in order to assess the existence of any indication of loss in value. Where such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset (equal to the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use) is estimated.

The net carrying amount of an asset or group of assets is reduced to its recoverable amount (higher of the fair value less costs to sell and the value in use), where this is lower.

Impairment losses can be reversed, with the exception of those relating to goodwill.

Veolia Environnement performs systematic annual impairment tests in respect of goodwill and other intangible assets with an indefinite useful life following the preparation of a long-term plan, or more frequently where there is an indication of loss in value. Where an exceptional impairment must be recorded, it is deducted in priority from goodwill allocated to the cash-generating unit (CGU) and then, where applicable, pro rata to the net carrying amounts of the other assets of the CGU.

The value in use is determined by discounting the future cash flows expected to be derived from the asset, CGU or group of CGUs considered, taking into account, where appropriate, the residual value. Given the Group’s activities, the cash-generating units generally represent a country in each Division. Future cash flows are taken for the first six years from the long-term plan validated by Executive Management. The main assumptions included in the calculation of the value in use of each cash-generating unit are the discount rate, changes in activity volumes, prices and direct costs (inflation) over the period and investments.



F-16



Back to Contents


A discount rate (weighted average cost of capital) is determined for each asset, CGU or group of CGUs: it is equal to the risk-free rate plus a risk premium weighted for country-specific risks. The discount rates estimated by management for each cash-generating unit therefore reflect current market assessments of the time value of money and the country specific risks to which the cash-generating unit is exposed, with the other risks reflected in the expected future cash flows from the assets.

Changes in volumes, prices and direct costs are based on past changes and expected future market trends.

The terminal value is calculated based on discounted forecast flows for the last year (2015). These flows include organic growth such as inflation.

As Water activities in China follow a specific economic model, with extremely long contract terms (up to fifty years) and high investment flows during the initial contract years, fiscal year 2015 may not be considered a standard year. Therefore, exceptionally, the business plan was extended to 2024 for the “Water–China” cash-generating unit, in order to identify standard flows for the calculation of the terminal value. The growth rate to perpetuity set out in Note 4 applies from this year.

1.12

Inventories

In accordance with IAS 2,Inventories, inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the estimated costs of completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale.

1.13

Assets classified as held for sale and liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale, discontinued operations

IFRS 5,Non-Current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations, sets out the accounting treatment applicable to assets held for sale and presentation and disclosure requirements for discontinued operations.

The standard notably requires the separate presentation of assets held for sale in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position at the lower of net carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell.

In addition, the standard requires the separate presentation in the income statement of the results of discontinued operations for all comparative periods on a retrospective basis.

A discontinued operation is a component of an entity that either has been disposed of or is classified as held for sale and:

represents a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations,

is part of a single coordinated plan to dispose of a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations or,

is a subsidiary acquired exclusively with a view to resale.

Therefore, as of December 31, 2009, the results of operations sold or in the course of being sold in 2009 must also be adjusted in the comparative financial statements as of December 31, 2007 and 2008. The 2008 and 2007 comparative income statements therefore differ from those published previously.

The impact of these operations on cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities is presented at the foot of the Consolidated Cash Flow Statement for the year ended December 31, 2009 and comparative periods.

The 2008 and 2007 Consolidated Statements of Financial Position are unchanged.



F-17



Back to Contents


1.14

Provisions

Pursuant to IAS 37,Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets, a provision is recorded when, at the year end, the Group has a current legal or implicit obligation to a third party as a result of a past event, and it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and the amount of the obligation can be reliably estimated.

As part of its obligations under public services contracts, the Group generally assumes responsibility for the maintenance and repair of installations of the publicly-owned utility networks it manages. The resulting maintenance and repair costs are analyzed in accordance with IAS 37 on provisions and, where necessary, a provision for contractual commitments is recorded where there is outstanding work to be performed.

In the event of a restructuring, an obligation exists if, prior to the period end, the restructuring has been announced and a detailed plan produced or implementation has commenced. Future operating costs are not provided.

In the case of provisions for restoration of waste storage facilities, Veolia Environnement accounts for the obligation to restore a site as waste is deposited, recording a non-current asset component and taking into account inflation and the date on which expenses will be incurred (discounting). The asset is amortized based on its depletion.

Provisions giving rise to an outflow after more than one year are discounted if the impact is material. Discount rates reflect current assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the liability. The unwinding of the discount is recorded in the Consolidated Income Statement in “Other financial income and expenses”.

1.15

Financial instruments

1.15.1

Financial assets and liabilities

Financial assets include assets classified as available-for-sale and held-to maturity, assets at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement, asset derivative instruments, loans and receivables and cash and cash equivalents.

Financial liabilities include borrowings, other financing and bank overdrafts, liability derivative instruments and operating payables.

The recognition and measurement of financial assets and liabilities is governed by IAS 39.

1.15.2

Measurement, recognition and derecognition of financial assets

Financial assets are initially recognized at fair value including transaction costs, where the assets concerned are not subsequently measured at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement. Where the assets are measured at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement, transaction costs are expensed directly to net income.

The Group classifies financial assets in one of the four categories identified by IAS 39 on the acquisition date:

Held-to-maturity assets

Held-to-maturity assets are financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturities, other than loans and receivables, that the Group acquires with the positive intention and ability to hold to maturity. After initial recognition at fair value, held-to-maturity assets are recognized and measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.

Held-to-maturity assets are reviewed for objective evidence of impairment. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of the financial asset exceeds the present value of future cash flows discounted at the initial EIR. The impairment loss is recognized in the Consolidated Income Statement.

Net gains and losses on held-to-maturity assets consist of interest income and impairment losses.



F-18



Back to Contents


Available-for-sale assets

Available-for-sale assets mainly consist of non-consolidated investments and marketable securities that do not qualify for inclusion in other financial asset categories. They are measured at fair value, with fair value movements recognized directly in other comprehensive income, except where there is a material or long-term unrealized capital loss. This can arise when future cash flows decrease to such an extent that the fair value of these assets falls materially or long-term below the historical cost. Where this is the case, the impairment loss is recognized in the Consolidated Income Statement. Impairment reversals are recognized in the Consolidated Income Statement for debt securities only (receivables and bonds).

Amounts recognized in other comprehensive income are released to income on the sale of the relevant investment. Fair value is equal to market value in the case of quoted securities and an estimate of the fair value in the case of unquoted securities, determined based on financial criteria most appropriate to the specific situation of each security. Non-consolidated investments which are not quoted in an active market and for which the fair value cannot be measured reliably, are recorded as a last resort by the Group at historical cost less any accumulated impairment losses.

Net gains and losses on available-for-sale assets consist of interest income, dividends, impairment losses and capital gains and losses on disposal.

Loans and receivables

This category includes loans to non-consolidated investments, operating financial assets, other loans and receivables and trade receivables. After initial recognition at fair value, these instruments are recognized and measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.

An impairment loss is recognized if, where there exists an indication of impairment, the carrying amount of these assets exceeds the present value of future cash flows discounted at the initial EIR. The impairment loss is recognized in the Consolidated Income Statement.

The impairment of trade receivables is calculated using two methods:

a statistical method: this method is based on past losses and involves the application of a provision rate by category of aged receivables. The analysis is performed for a group of similar receivables, presenting similar credit characteristics as a result of belonging to a client category and country.

an individual method: the probability and amount of the loss is assessed on an individual case basis in particular for non-State public debtors (past due period, other receivables or payables with the counterparty, rating issued by an external rating agency, geographical location).

Net gains and losses on loans and receivables consist of interest income and impairment losses.

Assets and liabilities at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement

This category includes:

 trading assets and liabilities acquired by the Group for the purpose of selling them in the near term in order to realize a capital gain, which form part of a portfolio of identified financial instruments that are managed together and for which there is evidence of a recent actual pattern of short-term profit-taking. Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting are also considered trading assets and liabilities.

 assets designated at fair value and primarily the portfolio of cash UCITS whose performance and management is based on fair value.

Changes in the value of these assets are recognized in the Consolidated Income Statement.

Net gains and losses on assets at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement consist of interest income, dividends and fair value adjustments.

Net gains and losses on derivatives entered into for trading purposes consist of flows exchanged and the change in the value of the instrument.



F-19



Back to Contents


Derecognition of financial assets

The Group derecognizes a financial asset when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire or when it transfers the contractual rights to the cash flows from the financial asset in a transaction under which nearly all the rights and obligations inherent to ownership of the financial asset are transferred. Any interest created or retained by the Group in a financial asset is recognized separately as an asset or liability.

1.15.3

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash equivalents are held to meet short-term cash commitments. Cash and cash equivalents include all cash balances, deposits with a maturity of less than 3 months when initially recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, monetary UCITS and negotiable debt instruments. These investments can be converted into cash or sold in the very short term and do not present any material risk of loss in value. Cash equivalents are designated as assets at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement.

Bank overdrafts repayable on demand which form an integral part of the Group’s cash management policy represent a component of cash and cash equivalents for the purposes of the cash flow statement.

1.15.4

Recognition and measurement of financial liabilities

With the exception of trading liabilities and liability derivative instruments which are measured at fair value, borrowings and other financial liabilities are recognized initially at fair value less transaction costs and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.

The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments or receipts over the estimated term of the financial instrument or, where applicable, over a shorter period, to the net carrying amount of the financial asset or liability.

When the financial liability issued includes an embedded derivative which must be recognized separately, the amortized cost is calculated on the debt component only. The amortized cost at the acquisition date is equal to the proceeds from the issue less the fair value of the embedded derivative.

1.15.5

Non-controlling interest put options

Pursuant to IAS 27, non-controlling interests in fully consolidated subsidiaries are considered a component of equity.

Furthermore, in accordance with IAS 32, non-controlling interest put options are considered as liabilities.

Pending an IFRIC interpretation or a specific IFRS, the Group has adopted the following accounting treatment:

the present value of purchase commitments is recorded in borrowings in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, through non-controlling interests and where necessary goodwill for the residual balance

gains or losses resulting from the unwinding of the discount on the liability are recorded in finance costs and, when the put exercise price varies, changes in the value of the instrument resulting from changes in valuation assumptions concerning the commitment are recorded in borrowings through goodwill.

If the non-controlling interests have not been purchased on the expiry of the commitment, equity attributable to non-controlling interests is reconstituted through goodwill and the liability recognized in respect of the commitment (no longer necessary).



F-20



Back to Contents


1.15.6

Recognition and measurement of derivative instruments

The Group uses various derivative instruments to manage its exposure to interest rate and foreign exchange risks resulting from its operating, financial and investment activities. Certain transactions performed in accordance with the Group interest rate and foreign exchange risk management policy do not satisfy hedge accounting criteria and are recorded as trading instruments.

Derivative instruments are recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position at fair value. Other than the exceptions detailed below, changes in the fair value of derivative instruments are recorded through the Consolidated Income Statement. The fair value of derivatives is estimated using standard valuation models which take into account active market data.

Net gains and losses on instruments at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement consist of flows exchanged and the change in the value of the instrument.

Derivative instruments may be designated as hedges under one of three types of hedging relationship: fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation:

a fair value hedge is a hedge of exposure to changes in fair value of a recognized asset or liability, or an identified portion of such an asset or liability, that is attributable to a specific risk (notably interest rate or foreign exchange risk), and could affect net income for the period.

a cash flow hedge is a hedge of exposure to variability in cash flows that is attributable to a specific risk associated with a recognized asset or liability or a highly probable forecast transaction (such as a planned purchase or sale) and could affect net income for the period.

a hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation hedges the exposure to foreign exchange risk of the net assets of a foreign operation including loans considered part of the investment (IAS 21,The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates).

An asset, liability, firm commitment, future cash-flow or net investment in a foreign operation qualifies for hedge accounting if:

the hedging relationship is precisely defined and documented at the inception date;

the effectiveness of the hedge is demonstrated at inception and by regular verification of the offsetting nature of movements in the market value of the hedging instrument and the hedged item. The ineffective portion of the hedge is systematically recognized in the Consolidated Income Statement.

The use of hedge accounting has the following consequences:

in the case of fair value hedges of existing assets and liabilities, the hedged portion of these items is measured at fair value in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position. The gain or loss on remeasurement is recognized in the Consolidated Income Statement, where it is offset against matching gains or losses arising on the fair value remeasurement of the hedging financial instrument, to the extent it is effective;

in the case of cash flow hedges, the portion of the gain or loss on the fair value remeasurement of the hedging instrument that is determined to be an effective hedge is recognized directly in other comprehensive income, while the gain or loss on the fair value remeasurement of the underlying item is not recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognized in the Consolidated Income Statement. Gains or losses recognized in other comprehensive income are released to the Consolidated Income Statement in the same period or periods in which the asset acquired or liability issued impacts net income;

in the case of net investment hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the hedging instrument is recognized in translation reserves in other comprehensive income, while the ineffective portion is recognized in the Consolidated Income Statement. Gains and losses recognized in foreign exchange translation reserves are released to the Consolidated Income Statement when the foreign investment is sold.



F-21



Back to Contents


1.15.7

Embedded derivatives

An embedded derivative is a component of a host contract that satisfies the definition of a derivative and whose economic characteristics are not closely related to that of the host contract. An embedded derivative must be separated from its host contract and accounted for as a derivative if, and only if, the following three conditions are satisfied:

the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative are not closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract;

the embedded derivative satisfies the definition of a derivative laid down in IAS 39; and

the hybrid instrument is not measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in the Consolidated Income Statement.

1.15.8

Treasury shares

Treasury shares are deducted from equity.

Gains or losses arising from the sale of treasury shares and related dividends are recognized directly in equity and do not impact the Consolidated Income Statement.

1.16

Pension plans and other post-employment benefits

Veolia Environnement and its subsidiaries have several pension plans.

Defined contribution plans: plans under which the Group (or a Group entity) pays an agreed contribution to a separate entity, relieving it of any liability for future payments.

These obligations are expensed in the Consolidated Income Statement when due.

Defined benefit plans: all plans which do not meet the definition of a defined contribution plan. The net obligations of each Group entity are calculated for each plan based on an estimate of the amount employees will receive in exchange for services rendered during the current and past periods. This amount is then discounted to present value and unamortized past service costs and the fair value of plan assets are deducted.

Where the calculation shows a plan surplus, the asset recognized represents the difference between the discounted present value of profits, in the form of future repayments or reductions in plan contributions, less the amount of unamortized past service costs. The plan surplus is recognized in non-current financial assets.

Certain obligations of the Group or Group entities may enjoy repayment entitlement, corresponding to a commitment by a third party to repay in full or in part the expenses relating to these obligations. Repayment entitlement is recognized in non-current financial assets.

Employee obligations of the Group are calculated using the projected unit credit method. This method is based on the probability of personnel remaining with companies in the Group until retirement, the foreseeable changes in future compensation, and the appropriate discount rate. Specific discount rates are adopted for each monetary zone. This results in the recognition of pension-related assets or provisions in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position and the recognition of the related net expenses.

Pursuant to IAS 19 revised, Employee Benefits, actuarial gains and losses are offset against other comprehensive income and are not amortized in the Consolidated Income Statement.



F-22



Back to Contents


1.17

Share-based payments

Pursuant to IFRS 2,Share-based Payment, an expense is recorded in respect of share purchase or subscription plans and other share-based compensation granted by the Group to its employees. The fair value of these plans on the grant date is expensed in the Consolidated Income Statement and recognized directly in equity in the period in which the benefit is vested and the service is rendered.

The fair value of purchase and subscription options is calculated using the Black and Scholes model, taking into account the expected life of the options, the risk-free interest rate, expected volatility, determined based on observed volatility in the past and dividends expected on the shares.

The compensation expense in respect of employee saving plans corresponds to the difference between the subscription price and the average share price at each subscription date, less a discount for non-transferability and to the Company’s contribution to subscribers.

1.18

Revenue

Revenue represents sales of goods and services measured at the fair value of the counterparty received or receivable.

Revenue from the sale of goods or services is recognized when the following conditions are satisfied:

the amount of revenue can be measured reliably;

the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the goods have been transferred to the buyer;

the recovery of the counterparty is considered probable;

the costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the transaction can be measured reliably.

1.18.1

Sales of goods

Sales of goods mainly concern the sale of technological procedures and solutions relating to the treatment of water (drinking water and wastewater treatment) in the Water Division and sales of products related to recycling activities in the Environmental Services Division.

Revenue relating to these sales is recognized on physical delivery of the goods, which represents the transfer of the inherent risks of ownership of these goods.

1.18.2

Sales of services

The provision of services represents the majority of Group businesses such as the processing of waste, water distribution and related services, network operation and passenger transport and energy services (heat distribution, thermal services and public lighting).

Revenue from these activities is recognized when the service is rendered and it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to Group entities.

These activities involve the performance of a service agreed contractually (nature, price) with a public sector or industrial customer, within a set period. Billing is therefore based on the waste tonnage processed/ incinerated, the volume of water distributed, the thermal power delivered or the number of passengers transported, multiplied by the contractually agreed price.

It should be noted that fees and taxes collected on behalf of local authorities are excluded from Revenue when the Group does not bear the risk of payment default by third parties.



F-23



Back to Contents


1.18.3

Construction contracts (excluding service concession arrangements)

Construction contracts primarily concern the design and construction of the infrastructures necessary for water treatment/distribution and wastewater treatment activities.

The related revenue is recognized in accordance with IAS 11,Construction Contracts (see Note 1.23).

1.18.4

IFRIC 4 Contracts

Contracts falling within the scope of IFRIC 4, Determining Whether an Arrangement Contains a Lease (see Note 1.21), involve services generally rendered to industrial/private customers. All service components to which the parties have agreed are detailed in contracts such as BOT (Build Operate Transfer) contracts.

Services include the financing of the construction of a specific asset/installation on behalf of the customer and the operation of the asset concerned.

Revenue relating to the construction of the asset is recognized in accordance with the provisions of IAS 11 and the asset is recorded in operating financial assets. Revenue is recognized on a completion basis at each period end, based on actual and expected costs.

The financing of construction work involves finance costs that are invoiced to the customer and recognized in Revenue, under Revenue from operating financial assets. This interest is recognized in Revenue from the start of construction work and represents remuneration received by the builder/lender.

Revenue relating to the operation of the asset is recognized on delivery of the goods or performance of the service depending on the operating activity.

1.18.5

Concession arrangements (IFRIC 12)

See Note 1.21 on Service concession arrangements.

1.19

Financial items in the Consolidated Income Statement

Finance costs consist of interest payable on borrowings calculated using the amortized cost method and losses on interest rate derivatives, both qualifying and not qualifying as hedges.

Interest costs included in payments under lease finance contracts are recorded using the effective interest method.

Finance income consists of gains on interest rate derivatives, both qualifying and not qualifying as hedges and income from cash investments and equivalents.

Interest income is recognized in the Consolidated Income Statement when earned, using the effective interest method.

Other financial income and expenses primarily include income on financial receivables calculated using the effective interest method, dividends, foreign exchange gains and losses, impairment losses on financial assets and the unwinding of discounts on provisions.

1.20

Income taxes

The income tax expense (credit) includes the current tax charge (credit) and the deferred tax charge (credit).

Deferred tax assets are recognized on deductible timing differences, tax loss carry forwards and/or tax credit carry forwards.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in prevailing tax laws and rates at the year end. Deferred tax balances are not discounted.

A deferred tax asset is recognized to the extent that the Group is likely to generate sufficient future taxable profits against which the asset can be offset. Deferred tax assets are impaired to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available.



F-24



Back to Contents


1.21

Description of Group concession activities

In the course of its business, Veolia Environnement provides collective services (distribution of drinking water and heating, passenger transport network, household waste collection, etc.) to local authorities in return for a remuneration based on services rendered.

These collective services (also known as services of general interest or general economic interest or public services) are generally managed by Veolia Environnement under contracts entered into at the request of public bodies which retain control thereof.

Concession arrangements involve the transfer of operating rights for a limited period, under the control of the local authority, using dedicated installations built by Veolia Environnement, or made available to it for a fee or nil consideration:

These contracts define “public service obligations” in return for remuneration. The remuneration is based on operating conditions, continuity of service, price rules and obligations with respect to the maintenance/replacement of installations. The contract determines the conditions for the transfer of installations to the local authority or a successor at its term.

Veolia Environnement can, in certain cases, be responsible for a given service as it holds the service support network (water/heat distribution network, water treatment network). Such situations are the result of full or partial privatizations. Provisions impose public service obligations and the means by which the local authority may recover control of the concession holder.

These contracts generally include price review clauses. These clauses are mainly based on cost trends, inflation, changes in tax and/or other legislation and occasionally on changes in volumes and/or the occurrence of specific events changing the profitability of the contract.

In addition, the Group generally assumes a contractual obligation to maintain and repair facilities managed under public service contracts. The resulting maintenance and repair costs are analyzed in accordance with IAS 37 on provisions and, where appropriate, a provision for contractual commitments is recorded in respect of commitments resulting from delays in the performance of work.

The nature and extent of the Group’s rights and obligations under these different contracts differ according to the public services rendered by the different Group divisions.

The accounting treatment is disclosed in Notes 5 and 10.

GoodwillWater:

Veolia Environnement manages municipal drinking water and/or waste water services. These services encompass all or part of the water cycle (extraction from natural sources, treatment, storage and distribution followed by collection and treatment of waste water and release into the environment).

In France, these services are primarily rendered under public service delegation “affermage” contracts with a term of 8 to 20 years. They concern the distribution of drinking water and/or the collection and treatment of waste water. They use specific assets, such as distribution or wastewater treatment networks and drinking water or wastewater treatment plants, which are generally provided by the concession grantor and returned to it at the end of the contract.

Abroad, Veolia Environnement renders its services under contracts which reflect local legislation, the economic situation of the country and the investment needs of each partner.

These contracts are generally concession arrangements, service contracts or O&M (Operate & Manage) and BOT contracts with an average term of between 7 and 40 years, and sometimes longer.

Contracts can also be entered into with public entities in which Veolia Environnement purchased an interest on their partial privatization. The profitability of these contracts is not fundamentally different from other contracts, but operations are based on a partnership agreement with the local authority.



F-25



Back to Contents


Environmental Services:

Both in France and abroad, the main concession arrangements entered into by Veolia Environnement concern the treatment and recovery of waste in sorting units, storage and incineration. These contracts have an average term of 18 to 30 years.

Energy Services:

Veolia Environnement has developed a range of energy management activities: heating and cooling networks, thermal and multi-technical services, industrial utilities, installation and maintenance of production equipment, integration services for the comprehensive management of buildings and electrical services on public roadways.

The main contracts concern the management of heating and air-conditioning networks under urban concessions or on behalf of local authorities.

In Eastern Europe, Veolia Environnement’s Energy Services Division provides services under mixed partial privatizations or through public-private partnerships with local authorities responsible for the production and distribution of thermal energy.

Transportation:

Veolia Environnement’s Transportation Division provides passenger transport services on behalf of local, regional and national public authorities.

Veolia Environnement primarily provides these services in France and abroad under service contracts comprising public service obligations (as per EU terminology), with terms of 7 to 15 years.

Accounting for service concession arrangements:

Concession arrangements are recognized in accordance with IFRIC 12,Service Concession Arrangements, published in November 2006. IFRIC 12 was approved by the European Union on March 26, 2009.

A substantial portion of the Group’s assets is used within the framework of concession or affermage contracts granted by public sector customers (“grantors”) and/or by concession companies purchased by the Group on full or partial privatization. The characteristics of these contracts vary significantly depending on the country and activity concerned.

Nonetheless, they generally provide, directly or indirectly, for customer involvement in the determination of the service and its remuneration, and the return of the assets necessary to the performance of the service at the end of the contract.

IFRIC 12 is applicable to concession arrangements comprising a public service obligation and satisfying all of the following criteria:

the concession grantor controls or regulates the services to be provided by the operator using the asset, the infrastructure, the beneficiaries of the services and prices applied;

the grantor controls the significant residual interest in the infrastructure at the end of the term of the arrangement.

Pursuant to IFRIC 12, such infrastructures are not recognized in assets of the operator as property, plant and equipment but in financial assets (“financial asset model”) and/or intangible assets (“intangible asset model”) depending on the remuneration commitments given by the grantor.



F-26



Back to Contents


1.21.1

Financial asset model

The financial asset model applies when the operator has an unconditional right to receive cash or another financial asset from the grantor.

In the case of concession services, the operator has such an unconditional right if the grantor contractually guarantees the payment of:

amounts specified or determined in the contract or

the shortfall, if any, between amounts received from users of the public service and amounts specified or determined in the contract.

Financial assets resulting from the application of IFRIC 12 are recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position under the heading “Operating financial assets” and recognized at amortized cost.

Unless otherwise indicated in the contract, the effective interest rate is equal to the weighted average cost of capital of the entities carrying the assets concerned.

Pursuant to IAS 39, an impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of these assets exceeds the present value of future cash flows discounted at the initial EIR.

The portion falling due within less than one year is presented in “Current operating financial assets”, while the portion falling due within more than one year is presented in the non-current heading.

Revenue associated with this financial model includes:

revenue recorded on a completion basis, in the case of construction operating financial assets (in accordance with IAS 11).

the remuneration of the operating financial asset recorded in Revenue from operating financial assets (excluding principal payments);

service remuneration.

1.21.2

Intangible asset model

The intangible asset model applies where the operator is paid by the users or where the concession grantor has not provided a contractual guarantee in respect of the recoverable amount. The intangible asset corresponds to the right granted by the concession grantor to the operator to charge users of the public service.

Intangible assets resulting from the application of IFRIC 12 are recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position under the heading “Concession intangible assets” and are amortized, generally on a straight-line basis, over the contract term. However, fees paid to local authorities that are an integral part of the cost of the intangible asset are disclosed under the heading “Other intangible assets”.

Under the intangible asset model, Revenue includes:

revenue recorded on a completion basis for assets and infrastructure under construction (in accordance with IAS 11).

service remuneration.

1.21.3

Mixed or bifurcation model

The choice of the financial asset or intangible asset model depends on the existence of payment guarantees granted by the concession grantor.

However, certain contracts may include a payment commitment on the part of the concession grantor covering only part of the investment, with the balance covered by royalties charged to users.

Where this is the case, the investment amount guaranteed by the concession grantor is recognized under the financial asset model and the residual balance is recognized under the intangible asset model.



F-27



Back to Contents


1.22

Finance Leases

IFRIC 4 seeks to identify the contractual terms and conditions of agreements which, without taking the legal form of a lease, convey a right to use a group of assets in return for payments included in the overall contract remuneration. It identifies in such agreements a lease contract which is then analyzed and accounted for in accordance with the criteria laid down in IAS 17, based on the allocation of the risks and rewards of ownership.

The contract operator therefore becomes the lessor of its customers. Where the lease transfers the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset in accordance with IAS 17 criteria, the operator recognizes a financial asset to reflect the corresponding financing, rather than an item of property, plant and equipment.

These financial assets are recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position under the heading “Operating financial assets”. They are initially recorded at the lower of fair value and total future flows and subsequently at amortized cost using the effective interest rate of the contract.

The portion falling due within less than one year is presented in “Current operating financial assets”, while the portion falling due within more than one year is presented in the non-current heading.

Contracts falling within the scope of IFRIC 4 are either outsourcing contracts with industrial customers, BOT (Build Operate Transfer) contracts, or incineration or cogeneration contracts under which, notably, demand or volume risk is, in substance, transferred to the prime contractor.

During the construction phase, a financial receivable is recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position and revenue in the Consolidated Income Statement, in accordance with the percentage completion method laid down in IAS 11 on construction contracts.

The financial receivables resulting from this analysis are initially measured at the fair value of lease payments and then amortized using the effective interest method.

After a review of the contract and its financing, the implied interest rate on the financial receivable is based on either the Group financing rate and /or the borrowing rate associated with the contract.

1.23

Construction contracts

Veolia Environnement recognizes income and expenses associated with construction contracts in accordance with the percentage of completion method defined in IAS 11.

These contracts are entered into with local authorities or private partners for the construction of infrastructures. They are generally fixed-price contracts as defined by IAS 11.

Revenue generated by construction services rendered by the Group is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable, where total income and expenses associated with the construction contract and the stage of completion can be determined reliably.

The percentage of completion is determined by comparing costs incurred at the period-end with total estimated costs under the contract. Costs incurred are recognized as production cost and do not include either administrative or selling costs.

Where total contract costs exceed total contract revenue, the expected loss is recognized as an expense immediately via a provision for losses to completion, irrespective of the stage of completion and based on a best estimate of forecast results including, where appropriate, rights to additional income or compensation, where they are probable and can be determined reliably. Provisions for losses to completion are recorded as liabilities in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

Partial payments received under construction contracts before the corresponding work has been performed, are recognized in liabilities in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position under advances and down-payments received.

The amount of costs incurred, plus profits and less losses recognized (particularly in provisions for losses to completion) and intermediary billings is determined on an individual contract basis. Where positive, this amount is recognized in assets in “amounts due from customers for construction contract work”. Where negative, it is recognized in liabilities in “amounts due to customers for construction contract work”.



F-28



Back to Contents


1.24

Electricity purchase and sale contracts

Incidentally to their operations, certain Veolia Environnement subsidiaries are required to purchase or sell electricity on the market, in order to manage supplies and optimize costs.

Revenue

After analysis of contractual terms and conditions, the net margin on trading activity transactions is recognized in “Revenue”.

Financial instruments

Certain subsidiaries enter into electricity transactions (forward contracts, options) which are recognized as derivative instruments in accordance with IAS 39.

Application scope of IAS 39

Options and forward purchase and sale contracts with physical delivery are excluded from the application scope of IAS 39 if entered into for own use (exception for own-use).

This exception is applicable when the following conditions are satisfied:

The volumes purchased or sold under the contracts reflect the operating requirements of the subsidiary;

The contracts are not subject to net settlement as defined by IAS 39 and, in particular, physical delivery is systematic;

The contracts are not equivalent to sales of options, as defined by IAS 39.

Recognition and measurement of instruments falling within the application scope of IAS 39

Instruments falling within the application scope of IAS 39 are derivative instruments and are measured at fair value, calculated using models generally based on observable data. Fair value movements are recorded in operating income. The net impact of the unwinding of these transactions is recorded in revenue (see Note 28).

1.25

Greenhouse gas emission rights

Faced with increased greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere, the International Community introduced a regulatory system within the framework of the Kyoto protocol, aimed at reducing such emissions. This system was finalized in 1997 and came into effect in February 2005 and seeks to achieve a reduction in emission levels of at least 5% compared to 1990, over the commitment period 2008-2012 for industrialized countries. Emissions are capped through the allocation of emission rights (AAU: Assigned Amount Units) to each country, which must be surrendered in 2014 based on actual emissions during the period 2008-2012. Developing countries have no reduction objectives under the Kyoto protocol, but emission credits (CER: Certified Emission Reduction) may be presented to companies or States that contribute to investments enabling a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions in these countri es.

At the European level, the European Union decided to implement, via directive 2003/87/EC of October 13, 2003, an internal trading system for emission rights (EUA: EU Allowance). This system has been in effect since January 1, 2005. Draft directive 2004/101/EC established a link between the Kyoto system and the European system, enabling the operators concerned to use CER, up to an agreed maximum, to satisfy their surrender obligations in the place of EUA.

Directive 2009/29/EC of April 26, 2009 amended the ETS directive and extended the allowance trading system beyond the second period (2008-2012). It covers the period 2013-2020 and provides for a progressive reduction in allowances allocated and new allocation procedures.

In this context, the Group (primarily the Energy Services Division) was allocated free of charge by the different States of the European Union, a certain number of emission rights (EUA) for an initial period 2005-2007 (EUA I) and then for a second period 2008-2012 (EUA II). The actual emissions position is determined each year and the corresponding rights surrendered. The Group then purchases or sells emission rights, depending on whether actual emissions are greater or lesser than emission rights allocated.



F-29



Back to Contents


In the absence of specific IFRS provisions, the Group has adopted the “net liability approach”, which involves the recognition of a liability at the period-end if actual emissions exceed allowances held, in accordance with IAS 37.

Allowances are managed as a production cost and, in this respect, are recognized in inventories:

at nil value, when they are received free of charge,

at acquisition cost, if purchased for valuable consideration on the market.

Consumption of this inventory is recognized on a weighted-average unit cost basis.

Transactions in these allowances performed on the forward market are recorded at market value at the period-end. Fair value gains and losses on financial instruments relating to these forward transactions are recognized in other comprehensive income or net income depending on whether they qualify as cash flow hedges in accordance with IAS 39.

1.26

Segment reporting

Since January 1, 2009, the Group identifies and presents segment reporting in accordance with IFRS 8,Operating Segments.

This information is taken from the internal organization of Group activities and corresponds to the four Group businesses (which were used for primary reporting purposes under the former segment reporting standard, IAS 14): Water, Environmental Services, Energy Services and Transportation.

The quantified indicators presented by operating segment form part of the key ratios used for budget validation, operating segment performance measurement and resource allocation reviewed by Executive Management.

Financial information by operating segment is prepared in accordance with the same rules used to prepare the Consolidated Financial Statements.

1.27

Fair value determination principles

The fair value of all financial assets and liabilities is determined at the period-end, either for recognition in the accounts or disclosure in the notes to the financial statements (see Note 27).

Fair value is determined:

i.

based on quoted prices in an active market, or

ii.

 using internal valuation techniques involving standard mathematical calculation methods integrating observable market data (forward rates, interest rate curves, etc.). Valuations produced by these models are adjusted to take account of a reasonable change in the credit risk of Veolia Group or the counterparty or

iii.

using internal valuation techniques integrating parameters estimated by the Group in the absence of observable market data.

Quoted prices in an active market

When quoted prices in an active market are available they are adopted in priority for the determination of the market value. Marketable securities and certain quoted bond issues are valued in this way.

Fair values determined using models integrating observable market data

The majority of derivative instruments (swaps, caps, floors, etc.) are traded over the counter and, as such, there are no quoted prices. Valuations are therefore determined using models commonly used by market participants to value such financial instruments.

Valuations calculated internally in respect of derivative instruments are tested every six months for consistency with valuations issued by our counterparties.



F-30



Back to Contents


The fair value of unquoted borrowings is calculated by discounting contractual flows at the market rate of interest.

The net carrying amount of receivables and payables falling due within less than one year and certain floating-rate receivables and payables is considered a reasonable estimate of their fair value, due to the short payment and settlement periods applied by the Veolia Group.

The fair value of fixed-rate loans and receivables depends on movements in interest rates and the credit risk of the counterparty.

Valuations produced by these models are adjusted to take account of changes in Veolia Group credit risk.

Fair values determined using models integrating certain non-observable data

Derivative instruments valued using internal models integrating certain non-observable data include certain electricity derivative instruments for which there are no quoted prices in an active market (notably for electricity purchase options with extremely long maturity) or observable market data (forward prices for component materials, interest-rate curves, etc.), in particular for distant maturities

NOTE 2

Use of management estimates in the application of group accounting standards

Veolia Environnement may be required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. Future results may be different from these estimates.

Underlying estimates and assumptions are determined based on past experience and other factors considered as reasonable given the circumstances. They act as a basis for making judgments necessary to the determination of the carrying amount of assets and liabilities, which cannot be obtained directly from other sources. Future values could differ from these estimates.

Underlying estimates and assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. The impact of changes in accounting estimates is recognized in the period the change is made if it affects this period only and in the period the change is made and prior periods if they are also affected by the change.

Notes 1.10 and 4 on goodwill and business combinations present the method adopted for the allocation of the purchase price on business combinations. This allocation is based on future cash flow assumptions and discount rates.

Notes 1.11, 4 and 6 concern goodwill and non-current asset impairment tests. Group management performed tests based on best forecasts of discounted future cash flows of the activities of the cash-generating units concerned. Sensitivity analyses were also performed on invested capital values and are presented in the aforementioned notes.

Note 1.15 describes the principles adopted for the determination of financial instrument fair values.

Note 28 on derivative instruments describes the accounting treatment of derivative instruments. Veolia Environnement valued these derivative instruments, allocated them and tested their effectiveness where necessary.

Notes 16 and 30 on provisions and employee commitments detail the provisions recognized by Veolia Environnement. Veolia Environnement determined these provisions based on best estimates of these obligations.

Note 22 on the income tax expense presents the tax position of the Group and is primarily based in France and in the United States on best estimates available to the Group of trends in future tax results.

All these estimates are based on organized procedures for the collection of forecast information on future flows, validated by operating management, and on expected market data based on external indicators and used in accordance with consistent and documented methodologies.



F-31



Back to Contents


The calculation methodology for discount rates adopted as of December 31, 2008 was analyzed with respect to the financial crisis. Following the stabilization of the financial context in 2009, these rates were analyzed again taking account of current conditions and using the following procedures:

Application of IAS 36,Impairment of assets: in accordance with Group practice, the discount rates used correspond to the weighted-average cost of capital, calculated annually at the end of the first half-year. A review of these rates as of December 31, 2009 did not call into question this practice.

Application of IAS 37,Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets: the discount rates used consist of a risk-free interest rate and a risk premium specific to the underlying assets and liabilities. The adjustment applied to this risk premium in December 2008 to limit market volatility in this period, was not considered necessary at the 2009 year-end

Application of IAS 19,Employee Benefits: the exclusive use of market indices and, in particular, the iboxx index in those countries where this index exists, was suspended as of December 31, 2008 due to the highly volatile nature of these indices. Commitments were once again measured using a range of market indices and, in particular the iboxx index, at the December 31, 2009 year-end.

NOTE 3

Significant events

As was the case in the second half of 2008, 2009 was marked by the financial crisis and its economic repercussions, and specifically:

significant exchange rate fluctuations, which modified the contribution of businesses from outside the euro zone, particularly in Eastern Europe and on the U.S. dollar;

 the downward trend in energy prices and CO2 emission rights;

the fall, followed by the stagnation or rise in the price of certain recycled raw materials (particularly paper and cardboard) ;

the slowdown in activity, affecting volumes in the Environmental Services business lines, and, to a lesser extent, new orders in construction business in the Water and Energy Services Divisions;

the difficult financial situation of industry economic players and, to a lesser extent, public players which weighed on the performance of certain growth projects and the solvency of some customers.

The first signs of stabilization of the economic environment began to appear, nonetheless, during the second half of 2009.

In accordance with the decision of the May 7, 2009 Shareholders’ General Meeting, the Group offered its shareholders a share or cash option with respect to the dividend payment. The share payment option was adopted by 58% of shareholders, resulting in the creation of 20.1 million shares representing a little over 4.25% of the share capital and 4.39% of the voting rights.

As part of the refinancing of its EMTN program, Veolia Environnement carried out three bond issues: a €1,250 million bond issue, bearing annual interest at a fixed rate of 5.25% and maturing on April 24, 2014, a €750 million bond issue, bearing annual interest at a fixed rate of 6.75% and maturing on April 24, 2019, and a €250 million bond issue, bearing annual interest at a fixed rate of 5.70% and maturing in June 29, 2017.

The Group continued its strategic development and discussions with Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations aimed at combining its Transportation activities with Transdev in accordance with the proposal announced at the beginning of August 2009. In December 2009, Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations and Veolia Environnement reached a framework agreement for the combination, which primarily covers the financial structure of the new group, with a view to signature of a final agreement in 2010, contingent on receipt of the necessary competition authorizations. The proposed combination of Veolia Transport and Transdev would be carried out by way of the contribution of Veolia Transport and Transdev to a new entity, held 50% by Veolia Environnement, acting as the industrial operator so as to retain transportation as a key component of its environmental services, and 50% by Caiss e des Dépôts et Consignations, acting as long-term strategic shareholder. These discussions form part of the planned future listing of the Group’s Transportation business.



F-32



Back to Contents


As part of its divestiture program, the Group performed the following divestitures in 2009:

On June 24, 2009, the Environmental Services Division announced that it had entered into exclusive discussions with TFN Group with respect to the sale of Veolia Propreté Nettoyage et Multiservices (VPNM). The sale was completed on August, 26, 2009 for an enterprise value of €111 million.

On July 6, 2009, Environmental Services Division announced the signature of an agreement relating to the sale of the U.S. waste-to-energy activity (Montenay International); the partial sale of activities provided for in the agreement was completed in August 2009 for an enterprise value of €220 million.

On August 12, 2009 Dalkia announced the signature of an agreement for the sale of its Facilities Management activities in the United Kingdom for a total amount of €90 million (Group share) as of December 31, 2009.

On December 1, 2009 Veolia Environnement announced the completion of the sale of Veolia Cargo to Transport Ferroviaire Holding (SNCF Group) for its activities in Germany, the Netherlands and Italy and to Europorte (Eurotunnel group) for its activities in France. The divestiture of Veolia Cargo at its enterprise value amounted to €94 million.

On November 9, 2009, the Group announced the signature of a partnership between Dalkia and CEZ, the number-one electricity producer in the Czech Republic, to develop an industrial cooperation and potentially leading to asset transfers. As a first step, CEZ acquired 15% of Dalkia Czech Republic for €123 million (100% value), subject to obtaining the necessary competition authorizations. This transaction had not been completed as of December 31, 2009.

On December 22, 2009, Veolia Eau reviewed certain economic aspects (financial restructuring) and the governance rules of its partnership with Mubadala Development Company in our operating activities in North Africa and the Middle East. This transaction resulted in a €189 million reduction in Group debt as of December 31, 2009.

In the fourth quarter of 2009, the Group finalized the sale of a minority interest in Compagnie Méridionale de Navigation for €45 million.

Finally, in December 2009 the EBRD acquired an additional 6.88% interest in Veolia Voda (through a reserved share capital increase), the entity grouping together all Water Division operating activities in Central Europe, for €70 million.

- The Group is currently in exclusive discussions with RATP for the sale of its Transportation activities in the United Kingdom (corresponding to an autonomous cash-generating unit), Switzerland and a limited number of contracts in France, as part of the combination with Transdev, in accordance with the proposal announced in August 2009. Activities in the United Kingdom were reclassified in discontinued operations in the Group financial statements as of December 31, 2009.

- Finally, the Group decided to sell its Renewable Energies activities in the Energy Services Division during 2010. These activities represent a largely independent uniform unit (“cash-generating unit”) as defined by IFRS 5 and have therefore been classified in discontinued operations in the Group financial statements as of December 31, 2009.



F-33



Back to Contents


NOTE 4

Goodwill

Goodwill breaks down as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31,2008

As of
December 31,2007

Gross

7,104.9

7,211.2

7,013.3

Impairment losses

(480.3)

(487.9)

(100.1)

Net

6,624.6

6,723.3

6,913.2


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Gross

7,013.3

5,799.6

4,834.1

Impairment losses

(100.1)

(94.6)

(81.8)

Net

6,913.2

5,705.0

4,752.3


As of December 31, 2007, accumulated impairment losses mainly concern Transportation Division activities in Scandinavia (€70 million recognized in 2004).

The main goodwill balances in net carrying amount by cash-generating unit (amounts in excess of €100 million)million as of December 31, 2009) are as follows:follows:

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31,2008

As of
December 31,2007

Water - Distribution France

743.3

743.2

760.5

Environmental Services – United Kingdom

690.0

644.3

824.2

Environmental Services North America Solid Waste

591.3

610.8

567.8

Environmental Services - Germany

402.1

397.8

748.2

Dalkia France

337.8

338.5

342.8

Water Solutions & Technologies

280.3

245.8

206.1

Water – China

240.4

247.5

145.7

Environmental Services France Solid Waste

238.5

272.4

150.0

Water – United Kingdom

222.7

197.4

245.3

Water – Czech Republic

219.1

216.4

220.6

Dalkia Italy

185.2

184.9

139.9

Transportation - United States

165.5

175.3

137.0

Energy Services – United States

147.4

152.6

139.6

Transportation – Passenger services France

143.7

136.2

117.7

Water Germany (excl. Berlin)

137.7

137.7

138.8

Water – Berlin

134.4

134.4

134.4

Veolia Energy Services – Poland

114.5

111.5

71.7

Transportation Sweden, Norway, Finland

114.4

104.8

124.5

Environmental Services - Marius Pedersen

102.2

100.9

90.0

Goodwill balances > €100 million as of December 31, 2009

5,210.5

5,152.4

5,308.4

Goodwill balances < €100 million

1,414.1

1,570.9

1,608.4

Goodwill

6,624.6

6,723.3

6,913.2


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Environmental Services United Kingdom

824.2

894.0

109.9

Water France Distribution

760.5

729.1

725.1

Environmental Services Germany

748.2

-

-

Environmental Services North America Solid Waste

567.8

610.3

672.0

Dalkia France

342.8

330.2

330.1

Water Central and Eastern Europe

266.9

255.9

169.9

Water United Kingdom

245.3

228.2

215.0

Water Solutions and Technologies

206.1

189.2

148.4

Environmental Services France Solid Waste

179.8

173.1

169.5

Transportation North America

145.5

154.8

90.1

Water China

145.5

145.7

186.5

Dalkia Italy

139.9

130.7

96.3

Veolia Energy Services United States

139.6

-

-

Water Germany (excluding Berlin)

138.8

138.1

137.3

Water Berlin

134.4

134.4

134.4

Water France joint venture subsidiaries

133.6

133.6

133.6

Transportation Sweden, Norway, Finland

124.5

106.0

96.8

Transportation France

117.7

115.4

108.7

Environmental Services Italy

114.6

-

-

Goodwill balances   > €100 million in 2007

5,475.7

4,468.7

3,523.6

Goodwill balances < €100 million in 2007

1,437.5

1,236.3

1,228.7

Goodwill

6,913.2

5,705.0

4,752.3

Goodwill balances of less than €100 million break down by division as follows:

Goodwill balances < €100 million

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31,2008

As of
December 31,2007

Water

275.5

325.3

357.0

Environmental Services

654.2

710.5

669.1

Energy Services

362.9

343.6

404.1

Transportation

114.0

135.0

177.5

Other

7.5

56.5

0.7

Total

1,414.1

1,570.9

1,608.4


As of December 31, 2009, accumulated impairment losses totaled €480.3 million and mainly concerned the Environmental Services Division in Germany (€343 million) and the Transportation Division in the Netherlands and Belgium (€38 million) and in Scandinavia (€64 million).

No material impairment losses were recognized in the Group financial statements as of December 31, 2009.



F-29F-34



Back to Contents


Movements in the net carrying amount of goodwill during 2007by division are as follows :follows:

(€ million)

As of
December 31,
2008

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign
exchange
translation

Impairment
losses

Other

As of
December 31,
2009

Water

2,247.7

10.0

14.4

 

(18.8)

2,253.3

Environmental Services

2,736.7

(84.1)

49.2

 

(23.4)

2,678.4

Energy Services

1,131.1

12.8

5.0

(1.0)

-

1,147.9

Transportation

551.3

(16.5)

11.6

(5.5)

(3.3)

537.6

Other

56.5

(16.3)

(0.6)

-

(32.2)

7.4

Goodwill

6,723.3

(94.1)

79.6

(6.5)

(77.7)

6,624.6


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2006

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Impairment losses and negative goodwill

Other

As of December 31, 2007

Water

2,028.6

197.3

(30.4)

2.0

10.7

2,208.2

Environmental Services

2,294.0

903.7

(147.2)

-

(1.0)

3,049.5

Energy Services

839.2

246.7

2.5

10.4

(0.7)

1,098.1

Transportation

543.2

43.8

(18.4)

(13.9)

2.0

556.7

Other

-

-

-

-

0.7

0.7

Goodwill

5,705.0

1,391.5

(193.5)

(1.5)

11.7

6,913.2

Changes in theconsolidation scope primarily concernedconcern divestitures in 2009 (Dalkia UK in the following acquisitions:Energy Services Division, VPNM in the Environmental Services Division and Freight activities in the Transportation Division) and the acquisition of Digismart in the Energy Services Division.

Environmental Services: Sulo Group (Germany) for €687.6 million and VSA Tecnitalia, formerly TMT (Italy) for €106.9 million;

Energy Services: Thermal North America Inc. (United States) for €139.3 million, Pannon Power (Hungary) for €30.1 million and CIT-Part (Brazil) for €21.3 million;

Water: Anox Kaldnes and its subsidiaries (Sweden) for €54.9 million, Thames Water subsidiaries (United Kingdom) for €50.2 million and Ruas (France) for €31.0 million;

Transportation: People Travel Group (Sweden) for €37.7 million andThe main acquisitions of transportation-on-demand companiesthe year are presented in Note 31, “Main acquisitions”, and new companiesthe divestitures are presented in Note 24, “Net income from discontinued operations”.

No material amendments were made to the United States for €21.1 million;opening balance sheets of 2008 acquisitions, including Tianjin Shibei WCO, Bartin Recycling and Praterm. The 12-month periods commencing the acquisition dates during which the Group can finalize the accounting recognition of the business combinations, pursuant to IFRS 3, had expired as of December 31, 2009.

Foreign exchange translation gains and losses losses are primarily due to the depreciation of the U.S. dollar and the appreciation of the pound sterling andagainst the U.S. dollareuro in the amount of €104.7-€37.2 million and €92.6€65.5 million respectively.

Impairment lossesOther movements total €26.7 million and include €6.9 million in respectprimarily consist of the impairmentreclassification of goodwill of the Eurolines  CGU and €19.7 million in respect of Danish transportation activities sold on August 31, 2007.Negative goodwill recognizedto “Assets classified as held for sale” in the Income Statement totaled €25.2amount of -€77.7 million, primarily in the Environmental Services Division, the Renewable Energies sector and includes €10.9 million forcertain French subsidiaries under joint control in the Transportation Division and €10.3 million for the Energy ServicesWater Division.

Impairment tests as of December 31, 2007:


2009:

Veolia Environnement performs systematic annual impairment tests in respect of goodwill and other intangible assets with an indefinite useful life. More frequent tests are performed where there is indication of a decreaseloss in value.

The recoverable value of a cash-generating unit is estimated in accordance with the method set-outprocedures set out in Note 1.10. The main assumptions on which the value in use1.11.

Veolia Environnement Group has 147 cash-generating units as of a cash-generating unit is based are the discount rate and trends in volumes, prices and direct costs (inflation) over the period.December 31, 2009.

Discount rates are estimated by management for each cash-generating unit andused in 2009 reflect current market assessmentsthe country or geographical area of the time value of money and the specific risks to which the cash-generating unit, is exposed. Trends in volumes, pricesaccordance with the criteria set out in Notes 1.11 and direct costs are based on past trends and the future market outlook.

Systematic impairment tests are based on future cash flows taken,2. The discount rates for the first five years, frommain geographical areas in 2009 were as follows:

• France:

6.8%

• United Kingdom:

7.0%

• United States:

6.8%

• China:

8.4%

• Germany:

6.8%

  


Similarly, perpetual growth rates used in 2009 to determine terminal values reflect the long-term planning processcountry or geographical area of the cash-generating unit, in June 2007. Cash flowsaccordance with the criteria set out in Notes 1.11. Average perpetual growth rates for years 6 to 15 are based on year 6 cash flows (taken from the long-term planning document) adjusted by an appropriate growth rate (1% to 3% on averagemain geographical areas in 2007, depending on the business). The terminal value is then calculated by discounting year 16 data to perpetuity, including only an organic growth rate such2009 were as inflation (0.5% to 3% on average in 2007, depending on the business).follows:

• France:

1.5%

• United Kingdom:

1.7%

• United States:

2.1%

• China:

1.9%

• Germany:

1.5%

  




F-30F-35



Back to Contents


Discount rates usedAs in 2007 reflect2008 and given the country or geographical area of the cash-generating unitcurrent economic climate, impairment tests were performed based on the criteria disclosed2010 budget for all Group cash-generating units: the reduction in Note 1.10. The main average discount rates by geographical areacash flows in 2007 were as follows:

France:

6.2%

United Kingdom:

7.1%

United States:

7.0%

Asia:

6.2% to 8.0%

Germany:

6.2%

  

Asthe 2010 budget prepared at the end of December 31, 2006, an impairment2009, of €7.3 million was recordedover 10% compared with 2010 figures in respectthe long-term plan, led the Group to review its business plans for two cash-generating units – Italy in the Energy Services Division and Spain in the Transportation Division.

Impairment tests did not lead to the recognition of the Germany Transportation CGU, representing the entireany material impairments of goodwill balance.

As of December 31, 2007, an impairment of €6.9 million was recorded in respect of the Eurolines CGU.2009.

Sensitivity of impairment tests:

ImpairmentA sensitivity analysis was performed on impairment tests, are based onassuming a 1% increase in the discount rate and a 1% decrease in the perpetual growth rate assumptions and an analysis of the sensitivity of perpetual growth rates and discount rates to an increase or decrease of 1%.rate.

A 1% increase in the discount rate would generate recoverable values for invested capital below the net carrying amount of certain cash-generating units. This reduction would be around €52 million.approximately -€291 million (including -€129 million for the “Energy Services - United States” cash-generating unit, -€62 million for the “Dalkia - Italy” cash-generating unit and -€31 million for the “Environmental Services – Italy” cash-generating unit).

A 1% decrease in perpetual growth rates would generate recoverable values for invested capital below the net carrying amount of certain cash-generating units. . This reduction would be around €27 million.approximately -€237 million (including -€106 million for the “Energy Services - United States” cash-generating unit, -€43 million for the “Dalkia - Italy” cash-generating unit and -€24 million for the “Environmental Services – Italy” cash-generating unit).

Recap: Movements in the net carrying amount of goodwill during 20062008 are as follows :follows:

(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Impairment losses and negative goodwill

Impact of divestments

Other

As of December 31, 2006

As of
December 31,
2007

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Impairment losses

Other

As of
December 31, 2008

Water

1,941.6

75.2

(12.5)

8.4

-

15.9

2,028.6

2,208.2

140.9

(42.6)

-

(58.8)

2,247.7

Environmental Services

1,527.7

840.9

(67.0)

-

(1.8)

(5.8)

2,294.0

3,049.5

211.3

(182.4)

(343.0)

1.3

2,736.7

Energy Services

836.3

36.9

0.6

0.8

-

(35.4)

839.2

1,098.1

58.4

(25.4)

-

-

1,131.1

Transportation

446.7

122.2

(10.4)

(6.8)

-

(8.5)

543.2

556.7

67.2

(17.5)

(55.3)

0.2

551.3

Other

0.7

53.2

2.6

-

-

56.5

Goodwill

4,752.3

1,075.2

(89.3)

2.4

(1.8)

(33.8)

5,705.0

6,913.2

531.0

(265.3)

(398.3)

(57.3)

6,723.3


In 2006, 2008,changes in consolidation scope primarily concerned the following acquisitions:acquisitions and disposals:

Water: Acquisition of Biothane Group (Netherlands and USA) for €42.7 million, acquisition of a joint investment in Tianjin Shibei WCO (China) for €37.7 million.

Environmental Services: Cleanaway (United Kingdom)Acquisition of Bartin Recycling Group (France) for €759.7 million and Biffa Belgium for €32.5 million;

Transportation: Supershuttle International (United States) for €69.9 million and Shuttleport (United States) for €17.5 million;

Water: Banska Bystrica STVPS (Slovakia) for €25.7 million and Poprad PVPS (Slovakia) for €10.2 million;€121.6 million.

Energy Services: €28.3

-

Acquisition of Praterm Group (Poland) for €51.3 million in Italy.and GEFI and Emicom within Siram Spa (Italy) for €44.9 million,

Foreign exchange translation losses were mainly the result-

Divestiture of the fallClemessy and Crystal activities for -€76.6 million.

Transportation: Acquisition of Rail4Chem (Germany) for €15.6 million and various companies in the US dollar against the euro (-€112 million).United States for €23.5 million.

Impairment losses total €10.1 million and include impairment

Other: Acquisition of goodwill of the Germany Transportation CGU of €7.3 million and purchase price allocation corrections of €2.8 million in the Germany Water CGU. Negative goodwill recognized in the Income Statement totaled €12.5 million, including €11.2 millionRidgeline (United States) for the Water Division.€45.0 million;

Other movements mainly concerned the definitive allocation of the ZEC Lodz purchase price (Energy Services in Poland) in the amount of -€34 million and of the Weir Techna purchase price (Water Engineering) in the amount of €14.1 million. Due to the limited impact, the 2005 financial statements were not restated.



F-31F-36



Back to Contents



Foreign exchange translation gains losses are primarily due to the depreciation of the pound sterling and the appreciation of the U.S. dollar against the euro in the amount of -€272.2 million and €62.2 million respectively.

Impairment losses recognized in 2008 total -€398.3 million and include -€343.0 million in respect of impairment of the goodwill of the Environmental Services Division Germany cash-generating unit and -€55.3 million in respect of impairment of the goodwill of the Transportation Division “Other European” cash-generating unit, corresponding to activities in the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Belgium.

Other movements primarily consist of the reclassification of the assets of certain French subsidiaries under joint control in the Water Division, to “Assets classified as held for sale” in the amount of -€58.8 million.

NOTE 5.5

Concession intangible assets

Movements in the net carrying amount of concession intangible assets during 2007:2009 are as follows:


(€ million)

As of

December 31, 2006

Additions

Disposals

Impairment losses

Amortization

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2007

As of
December 31,
2008

Additions

Disposals

Impairment
losses

Amortization

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign
exchange
translation

Other

As of
December 31,
2009

Concession intangible assets, gross

3,461.2

354.4

(55.7)

-

504.6

(60.9)

(11.7)

4,191.9

4,983.9

373.9

(32.6)

-

-

(146.1)

(40.7)

(9.3)

5,129.1

Amortization & impairment losses

(1,115.6)

-

44.1

0.4

(168.4)

(1.2)

4.0

34.0

(1,202.7)

(1,346.2)

-

30.8

(14.2)

(243.5)

29.4

3.9

35.5

(1,504.3)

Concession intangible assets, net

2,345.6

354.4

(11.6)

0.4

(168.4)

503.4

(56.9)

22.3

2,989.2

3,637.7

373.9

(1.8)

(14.2)

(243.5)

(116.7)

(36.8)

26.2

3,624.8


Additions concern the Water Division in the amount of €239.4€286.4 million, the Energy Services Division in the amount of €57.7 million and the Environmental Services Division in the amount of €10.8 million and the Energy Services Division in the amount of €104.1€21.6 million.

Changes in consolidation scope are mainly concern the expansionresult of a change in consolidation method (from full to proportionate consolidation) of the Water Division in North Africa and the Middle East for -€195.6 million and the entry of several entities into the consolidation scope under the Shenzhen contract in the Water Division in China for €41.9 million.

Foreign exchange translation gains and losses are primarily due to the depreciation of the Chinese renminbi yuan and the appreciation of the pound sterling against the euro in the amount of -€46.8 million and €16.8 million respectively.

Other movements primarily consist of the reclassification of non-current operating financial assets following the extension of a concession arrangement in the Water Division in the amount of €502.8€21.1 million (mainly in China and the United Kingdom).

Foreign exchange translationlosses mainly concernreclassification of the assets of certain French subsidiaries under joint control in the Water Division (-€49.4 million), following the depreciation of the Chinese yuan, the U.S. dollar and the pound sterling against the euro.

Other movements are primarily due to reclassifications resulting from finalization of the implementation of IFRIC 12“Assets classified as held for sale” in the Water, Energy Services and Environmental Services Divisions.amount of -€15.4 million.

Concession intangible assets by division break down as follows:


(€ million)



As of December 31, 2007

Net carrying amount as of December 31,

2006

Net carrying amount as of December 31,

2005

As of December 31, 2009

Net carrying
amount as of
December 31,
2008

Net carrying
amount as of
December 31,
2007

(€ million)



Gross carrying amount

Amortization & impairment losses

Net carrying amount

Net carrying amount as of December 31,

2006

Net carrying amount as of December 31,

2005

Gross carrying
amount

Amortization &
impairment losses

Net carrying
amount

3,091.6

(755.5)

2,336.1

3,787.1

(942.3)

2,844.8

2,892.0

2,336.1

Environmental Services

352.5

(109.8)

242.7

265.1

252.9

429.7

(166.5)

263.2

259.1

242.7

Energy Services

715.0

(326.2)

388.8

292.9

286.9

858.5

(378.5)

480.0

453.6

388.8

Transportation

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Other

32.8

(11.2)

21.6

21.2

18.2

53.8

(17.0)

36.8

33.0

21.6

Concession intangible assets

4,191.9

(1,202.7)

2,989.2

2,345.6

2,091.8

5,129.1

(1,504.3)

3,624.8

3,637.7

2,989.2




F-32F-37



Back to Contents


Recap: Movements in the net carrying amount of concession intangible assets during 2006:2008 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December 31,
2007

Additions

Disposals

Impairment
losses

Amortization

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign
exchange
translation

Other

As of
December 31,
2008

Concession intangible assets, gross

4,191.9

400.8

(14.9)

-

-

362.8

77.0

(33.7)

4,983.9

Amortization & impairment losses

(1,202.7)

-

14.2

0.5

(200.5)

(13.6)

(2.2)

58 .1

(1,346.2)

Concession intangible assets, net

2,989.2

400.8

(0.7)

0.5

(200.5)

349.2

74.8

24.4

3,637.7


(€ million)

As of

December 31, 2005

Additions

Disposals

Impairment losses

Amortization

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of

December 31, 2006

Concession intangible assets, gross

3,202.0

296.5

(13.1)

-

-

127.1

(20.7)

(130.6)

3,461.2

Amortization & impairment losses

(1,110.2)

-

10.3

(7.8)

(139.9)

(0.8)

0.1

132.7

(1,115.6)

Concession intangible assets, net

2,091.8

296.5

(2.8)

(7.8)

(139.9)

126.3

(20.6)

2.1

2,345.6

Additions concern the Water Division in the amount of €231.7€274.4 million, the Energy Services Division in the amount of €96.1 million and the Environmental Services Division in the amount of €19.7 million and the Energy Services Division in the amount of €45.2€26.6 million.

Changes in consolidation scope mainly concern the expansionexternal growth of the Water Division in the amount of €126.3€307.9 million (mainly in China)China, the United Kingdom and France).

Foreign exchange translation gains losses mainly concern the Water Division (-€22(€92.3 million), following the appreciation of the Chinese renminbi yuan and the depreciation of the Chinese yuanpound sterling against the euro.

Other movements primarily consist of the reclassification of the assets of certain French subsidiaries under joint control in the Water Division to “Assets classified as held for sale” in the amount of -€11.7 million.

NOTE 6.6

Other intangible assets

Other intangible assets break down as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31,2008

As of
December 31,2007

Intangible assets with an indefinite useful life, net

70.0

99.5

82.8

Intangible assets with a definite useful life gross

3,271.5

3,203.9

3,168.6

Amortization and impairment losses

(1,903.7)

(1,768.2)

(1,545.0)

Intangible assets with a definite useful life net

1,367.8

1,435.7

1,623.6

Intangible assets, net

1,437.8

1,535.2

1,706.4


Movements in the net carrying amount of other intangible assets during 2007:2009 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of December 31, 2006

Additions

Disposals

Amortization

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2007

As of
December
31,2008

Additions

Disposals

Impairment
losses

Amortization

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign exchange
translation

Other

As of
December
31, 2009

Intangible assets with an indefinite useful life, net

34.6

14.4

(0.1)

(1.0)

55.6

(5.9)

(14.8)

82.8

99.5

1.4

(0.0)

(1.1)

-

12.6

(1.7)

(40.7)

70.0

Fees paid to local authorities

672,4

19,6

(3.2)

(64.0)

1.1

(4.2)

12.8

634.5

576.5

13.8

(0.4)

(1.3)

(58.9)

(13.2)

(3.1)

(11.7)

501.7

Purchased contractual rights

377.5

2.7

(0.1)

(56.0)

375.8

(5.5)

(98.5)

595.9

398.9

0.1

(0.0)

(12.5)

(51.6)

(1.4)

3.6

(14.5)

322.6

Purchased software

126.8

44.3

(1.2)

(50.6)

7.3

0.1

4.7

131.4

143.9

45.4

(0.4)

(0.4)

(52.8)

(1.0)

3.1

4.4

142.2

Purchased customer portfolios

22.0

1.1

(0.3)

(7.0)

36.0

(2.4)

1.0

50.4

78.2

-

-

-

(10.8)

(3.4)

1.3

(0.0)

65.3

Other purchased intangible assets

93.9

22.2

(2.4)

(19.9)

6.2

(8.0)

89.7

181.7

203.1

18.8

(1.3)

(6.7)

(24.6)

5.7

1.5

(8.5)

188.0

Other internally-developed intangible assets

52.6

6.3

(0.2)

(4.0)

-

(2.5)

(22.5)

29.7

35.1

56.4

(0.1)

(0.1)

(10.7)

(0.9)

0.2

68.1

148.0

Intangible assets with a definite useful life net

1,345.2

96.2

(7.3)

(201.5)

426.4

(22.5)

(12.8)

1,623.6

1,435.7

134.5

(2.2)

(21.0)

(209.4)

(14.2)

6.6

37.8

1,367.8

Other intangible assets

1,379.8

110.6

(7.4)

(202.5)

482.0

(28.4)

(27.6)

1,706.4

1,535.2

135.9

(2.2)

(22.1)

(209.4)

(1.6)

4.9

(2.9)

1,437.8




F-33F-38



Back to Contents


Intangible assets with an indefinite useful life are primarily trademarks.

Changes in consolidation scope impacting intangible assets with an indefinite life mainly concern the fair value measurement in the Transportation Division of Supershuttle International acquisitions in the United States (€35.0 million).

Fees paid to local authorities in respect of public service contracts totaled €634.5€501.7 million as of December 31, 2007.2009, including €494.8 million for the Water Division. The amortization of fees paid at the beginning of concession arrangements, in the Water Division, calculated over the contract term, totaled €60.8-€58.9 million in 2007.2009, including -€55.8 million for the Water Division.

ChangesOther movements primarily consist of the reclassification of the assets of the Renewable Energies activity and of certain French subsidiaries under joint control in consolidation scope impacting contractual rights mainly concern the fair value measurement of Water Division assets in respect of acquisitionsto “Assets classified as held for sale” in the United States (Tetra Technologies for €21.3 million) and the United Kingdom for €23.9 million and acquisitions by the Environmental Services Division in Germany (€275.8 million) and Italy (€28.9 million).

Other intangible assets break down as follows:


(€ million)

As of December
31, 2007

As of
December
31, 2006

As of December
31, 2005

Intangible assets with an indefinite useful life, net

82.8

34.6

29.7

Intangible assets with a definite useful life, gross

3,168.6

2,749.4

2,490.0

Amortization and impairment losses

(1,545.0)

(1,404.2)

(1,238.3)

Intangible assets with a definite useful life, net

1,623.6

1,345.2

1,251.7

Intangible assets, net

1,706.4

1,379.8

1,281.4


amount of -€29.2 million.

Recap: Movements in the net carrying amount of other intangible assets during 2006:2008 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of December 31, 2007

Additions

Disposals

Impairment losses

Amortization

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2008

Intangible assets with an indefinite useful life, net

82.8

34.9

0.1

(0.9)

 

(12.2)

1.6

(6.8)

99.5

Fees paid to local authorities

634.5

8.8

(0.1)

 

(60.8)

(1.5)

11.5

(15.9)

576.5

Purchased contractual rights

595.9

-

-

(62.6)

(71.4)

(8.4)

(9.0)

(45.6)

398.9

Purchased software

131.4

55.1

(0.5)

 

(51.4)

(4.3)

(1.7)

15.3

143.9

Purchased customer portfolios

50.4

0.8

-

 

(13.7)

35.3

4.8

0.6

78.2

Other purchased intangible assets

181.7

31.2

(0.8)

(0.7)

(23.3)

31.0

(6.3)

(9.7)

203.1

Other internally-developed intangible assets

29.7

9.5

(0.2)

 

(6.1)

0.1

(0.2)

2.3

35.1

Intangible assets with a definite useful life net

1,623.6

105.4

(1.6)

(63.3)

(226.7)

52.2

(0.9)

(53.0)

1,435.7

Other intangible assets

1,706.4

140.3

(1.5)

(64.2)

(226.7)

40.0

0.7

(59.8)

1,535.2


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

Additions

Disposals

Amortization

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2006

Fees paid to local authorities

696.8

20.5

(1.1)

(62.2)

-

(5.1)

23.5

672.4

Contractual rights

212.2

-

-

(18.1)

142.4

0.8

40.2

377.5

Purchased software

118.9

46.2

(0.9)

(49.0)

2.0

(0.1)

9.7

126.8

Trademarks

19.2

19.2

(1.2)

(2.3)

(4.5)

(1.6)

(4.3)

24.5

Internally-developed software

3.2

0.9

-

(1.9)

-

-

0.2

2.4

Other internally-developed intangible assets

38.9

7.9

-

(6.5)

0.1

(3.9)

7.3

43.8

Other purchased intangible assets

192.2

22.4

(0.2)

(33.1)

23.3

(3.6)

(68.6)

132.4

Other intangible assets

1,281.4

117.1

(3.4)

(173.1)

163.3

(13.5)

8.0

1,379.8

Other intangible assets transferred to Assets classified as held for sale in 2006 totaled €0.2 million. No amounts were transferred to Assets classified as held for sale in 2005.

Fees paid to local authorities in respect of public service contracts totaled €672.4€576.5 million as of December 31, 2006.2008, including €569.7 million for the Water Division. The amortization over the contract term of fees paid at the beginning of concession arrangements, calculated over the contract term, totaled €60.8 million in 2008, including €59.4 million for the Water Division.

Changes in consolidation scope impacting “Purchased customer portfolios” primarily concern external growth in the French Water Division totaled €49.3(€16.7 million) and the Environmental Services Division (€19.8 million).

Changes in consolidation scope impacting “Other purchased intangible assets” primarily concern acquisitions in the Water Division.

Impairment losses recognized in the year total -€64.2 million and include -€62.6 million in 2006.respect of impairment of the intangible assets of the Environmental Services Division Germany cash-generating unit.

Other movements primarily consist of the reclassification of the assets of certain French subsidiaries under joint control in the Water Division to “Assets classified as held for sale” in the amount of -€12.4 million.



F-34F-39



Back to Contents


Changes in consolidation scope impacting contractual rights mainly concern Cleanaway United Kingdom (€37.2 million) and acquisitions by the Water Division in China (€58.7 million) and Slovakia (€40.1 million).NOTE 7


NOTE 7.

Property, plant and equipment

Movements in the net carrying amount of property, plant and equipment during 2007:2009 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of December 31, 2008

Additions

Disposals

Impairment losses

Depreciation

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2009

Property, plant and equipment, gross

19,491.5

1,598.7

(823.8)

-

-

(173.1)

315.6

(418.7)

19,990.2

Depreciation and impairment losses

(10,064.4)

-

602.5

(14.2)

(1,362.6)

126.6

(157.5)

261.8

(10,607.8)

Property, plant and equipment, net

9,427.1

1,598.7

(221.3)

(14.2)

(1,362.6)

(46.5)

158.1

(156.9)

9,382.4


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2006

Additions

Disposals

Impairment losses

Depreciation

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2007

Property, plant and equipment, gross

16,912.0

1,927.6

(699.6)

-

-

1,207.5

(421.0)

(40.6)

18,885.9

Depreciation

(8,993.3)

-

557.1

(35.7)

(1,179.5)

(168.1)

177.3

(40.5)

(9,682.7)

Property, plant and equipment, net

7,918.7

1,927.6

(142.5)

(35.7)

(1,179.5)

1,039.4

(243.7)

(81.1)

9,203.2

Net property, plant and equipment of €110.7 million was transferred to Assets classified as held for sale (including the  “Jean Nicoli” boat owned by the Transportation Division in the amount of €103.9 million), compared to €44.0 million in 2006 (vehicles in Denmark and incinerators in the United Kingdom).

Additions concern the Water Division in the amount of €365.6€330.4 million, the Environmental Services Division in the amount of €873,4€486.4 million, the Energy Services Division in the amount of €207.1€326.5 million and the Transportation Division in the amount of €449.7€423 million.

Disposals, net of provisionsimpairment losses and depreciation of -€221.3 million, mainly concern the Water Division in the amount of €20.7-€30.2 million, the Environmental Services Division in the amount of €59.5-€30.9 million and the Transportation Division in the amount of €51.6-€144.1 million.

Impairment losses mainly concern the impairment of Rimsa assets (Mexico) in the Environmental Services Division for €29.6 million, following the resolution of a dispute resulting in the receipt of compensation in the same amount.

Changes in consolidation scope mainly concern the acquisition of Thermal North America Inc. (€398.9 million), Pannon Power (€69.4 million), Delitzsch (€24.6 million) and Kolin (€23.0 million) by the Energy Services Division following the acquisition of Digismart in Estonia (+€47.3 million) and the Sulo Group byTransportation Division following the Environmental Services Division (€346.5divestiture of the Freight activity (-€124.7 million).

Foreign exchange translation gains and losses losses mainly concernare primarily due to the depreciationappreciation of the U.S. dollar and the pound sterling against the euro in the Water (-€119.1 million) and Environmental Services (-€137.5 million) Divisions.

Other movements mainly concernamount of €111.4 million, the reclassificationappreciation of the “Jean Nicoli” boat as held for saleAustralian dollar against the euro in the amount of €53.3 million and the depreciation of the U.S. dollar against the euro in the amount of -€103.9 million46.5 million.

Other movements consist of the reclassification of assets, and primarily the saleassets of TransportationDalkia Usti activities in Denmark(Czech Republic), to “Assets classified as held for sale” in the amount of €62.8 million (€113.5 million gross carrying amount and depreciation of €50.7 million).

An agreement was signed on December 11, 2007 for the sale of the “Jean Nicoli” boat and the effective transfer of ownership is scheduled for April 1, 2008.



F-35



Back to Contents


-€175.6 million.

Property, plant and equipment by division break down as follows:

(€ million)



As of December 31, 2007

Net carrying amount as of December 31,
2006

Net carrying amount as of December 31,
2005

As of December 31, 2009

Net carrying
amount as of
December 31,
2008

Net carrying
amount as of
December 31,
2007

(€ million)



Gross carrying amount

Depreciation & impairment losses

Net carrying amount

Net carrying amount as of December 31,
2006

Net carrying amount as of December 31,
2005

Gross carrying
amount

Depreciation &
impairment losses

Net carrying
amount

4,363.7

(2,112.8)

2,250.9

4,312.8

(2,182.4)

2,130.4

2,024.4

2,250.9

Environmental Services

7,922.8

(4,284.7)

3,638.1

3,104.3

2,821.5

8,693.7

(5,039.8)

3,653.9

3,838.7

3,638.1

Energy Services

2,870.7

(1,253.4)

1,617.3

955.9

819.4

3,178.0

(1,269.0)

1,909.0

1,816.6

1,617.3

Transportation

3,564.2

(1,961.2)

1,603.0

1,518.6

1,066.5

3,549.9

(1,987.9)

1,562.0

1,631.8

1,603.0

Other

164.5

(70.6)

93.9

81.7

71.3

255.8

(128.7)

127.1

115.6

93.9

Property, plant and equipment

18,885.9

(9,682.7)

9,203.2

7,918.7

6,885.7

19,990.2

(10,607.8)

9,382.4

9,427.1

9,203.2


The breakdown of property, plant and equipment by class of assets is as follows:

(€ million)



As of December 31, 2007

Net carrying amount as of December 31,
2006

As of December 31, 2009

Net carrying
amount as of
December 31,
2008

Net carrying
amount as of
December 31,
2007

(€ million)



Gross carrying amount

Depreciation & impairment losses

Net carrying amount

Net carrying amount as of December 31,
2006

Gross carrying amount

Depreciation & impairment losses

Net carrying
amount

1,387.8

(528.0)

859.8

1,513.5

(629.4)

884.1

901.0

859.8

Buildings

2,984.0

(1,323.7)

1,660.3

1,323.8

3,012.6

(1,392.2)

1,620.4

1,543.9

1,660.3

Technical installations, plant and equipment

7,282.6

(3,782.8)

3,499.8

2,951.6

7,920.9

(4,192.6)

3,728.3

3,638.9

3,499.8

Traveling systems and other vehicles

4,675.0

(2,721.0)

1,954.0

1,787.7

4,889.1

(2,950.1)

1,939.0

2,041.3

1,954.0

Other property, plant and equipment

1,934.4

(1,318.5)

615.9

539.8

2,077.2

(1,441.0)

636.2

643.5

615.9

Returnable assets

12.3

(5.9)

6.4

65.8

 

 

 

-

6.4

Owned property, plant and equipment in progress

606.8

(2.8)

604.0

398.0

576.9

(2.5)

574.4

657.8

604.0

Property, plant and equipment in progress

3.0

-

3.0

5.6

0.0

(0.0)

0.0

0.7

3.0

Property, plant and equipment

18,885.9

(9,682.7)

9,203.2

7,918.7

19,990.2

(10,607.8)

9,382.4

9,427.1

9,203.2




F-40



Back to Contents


Recap: Movements in the net carrying amount of property, plant and equipment during 2006:2008 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

Additions

Disposals

Impairment losses

Depreciation

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31,
2006

As of
December
31,2007

Additions

Disposals

Impairment
losses

Depreciation

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign
exchange
translation

Other

As of
December
31, 2008

Property, plant and equipment, gross

14,972.9

1,424.5

(635.6)

-

-

1,450.5

(125.0)

(175.3)

16,912.0

18,885.9

1,954.6

(726.2)

-

-

353.4

(945.6)

(30.6)

19,491.5

Depreciation

(8,087.2)

-

530.4

(60.2)

(1,055.3)

(621.4)

63.0

237.4

(8,993.3)

(9,682.7)

-

580.7

(0.3)

(1,272.2)

(84.3)

402.0

(7.6)

(10,064.4)

Property, plant and equipment, net

6,885.7

1,424.5

(105.2)

(60.2)

(1,055.3)

829.1

(62.0)

62.1

7,918.7

9,203.2

1,954.6

(145.5)

(0.3)

(1,272.2)

269.1

(543.6)

(38.2)

9,427.1



F-36Additions concern the Water Division in the amount of €372.6 million, the Environmental Services Division in the amount of €913.7 million, the Energy Services Division in the amount of €301.9 million and the Transportation Division in the amount of €324.7 million.

Disposals net of impairment losses and depreciation of -€145.5 million, mainly concern the Water Division in the amount of -€37.6 million, the Environmental Services Division in the amount of -€27.0 million and the Transportation Division in the amount of -€66.3 million.

Changes in consolidation scope primarily concern the acquisition in the Energy Services Division of the Praterm Group in Poland (€86.9 million) and in the Environmental Services Division of the Bartin Group in France (€43.4 million).

Foreign exchange translation losses mainly concern the depreciation of the pound sterling against the euro in the Water (-€287.8 million) and Environmental Services (-€155.6 million) Divisions.

Other movements primarily consist of the reclassification of the assets of certain French subsidiaries under joint control in the Water Division to “Assets classified as held for sale” in the amount of -€31.5 million.



F-41



Back to Contents


Net property, plant and equipment of €44.0 million was transferred to Assets classified as held for sale (vehicles in Denmark and incinerators in the United Kingdom), compared to €1.2 million in 2005.NOTE 8

Additions concern the Water Division in the amount of €322.3 million, the Environmental Services Division in the amount of €648.0 million, the Energy Services Division in the amount of €139.7 million and the Transportation Division in the amount of €290.3 million.

Disposals concern the Water Division in the amount of €5.8 million, the Environmental Services Division in the amount of €41.9 million, the Energy Services Division in the amount of €11.5 million and the Transportation Division in the amount of €43.3 million.

Impairment losses mainly concern the remeasurement at fair value of Transportation Division assets in the amount of €63 million, including €44 million in respect of assets located in Denmark (impairment losses recognized in "Net income (expense) from discontinued operations" in the Income Statement) and the impairment of an engine shed in the amount  of €18 million, relating to the operation of a railway contract in Germany.

Changes in consolidation scope mainly concern the acquisition of SNCM by the Transportation Division (€393 million), of Cleanaway United Kingdom (€223 million) and Biffa Belgium (€27 million) by the Environmental Services Division and of companies in China by the Water Division (€24 million).

Other movements mainly concern the definitive allocation of the ZEC Lodz purchase price (Energy Services in Poland) in the amount of €84.5 million.


NOTE 8.

Investments in associates

8.1

The principal investments in associates with a value of greater than €10 million as of December 31, 20072009 are as follows:

 

As of December 31,

 

% control

Share in equity

Share of net income

 

2009

2008

2007

2009

2008

2007

2009

2008

2007

Fovarosi Csatomazasi Muvek

25.00%

25.00%

25.00%

91.1

92.3

95.7

0.1

1.3

1.0

Regaz (Gaz de Bordeaux)

24.00%

  

23.8

-

-

4.0

-

-

Cie Méridionale de Navigation (2)

 

45.00%

45.00%

-

42.8

34.9

(10.2)

7.9

6.9

Doshion VWS

30.00%

30.00%

 

16.8

15.8

-

0.4

-

-

TIRU

24.00%

24.00%

24.00%

13.0

11.4

13.1

1.1

0.1

0.1

Cie Méridionale de Participations (2)

 

45.00%

45.00%

-

12.5

12.5

(0.0)

-

0.1

Berlinwasser China Holding (BWI)

49.00%

49.00%

 

12.0

6.2

-

0.2

-0.3

-

Stadtereinigung Holtmeyer GmbH

40.00%

40.00%

 

11.9

12.3

-

(0.4)

1.0

-

Stadtreinigung Dresden GmbH (3)

 

49.00%

49.00%

-

10.1

9.6

-

1.3

-

Other amounts < €10 million in 2008 and 2009

   

99.9

108.2

126.3

3.9

7.2

8.8

Investments in associates

   

268.5

311.6

292.1

(0.9)(1)

18.5(1)

16.9(1)


(1)

These amounts include the share of net income of associates realized by Freight and Renewable Energy activities in the process of being sold. Pursuant to IFRS 5, this net income was transferred from “Share of net income of associates” to “Net income from discontinued operations” in the amount of -€2.4 million in 2009, -€1.0 million in 2008 and -€0.2 million in 2007.

(2)

Companies sold in 2009

(3)

Change in consolidation method (from equity accounting to proportionate consolidation)


 

As of December 31,

% control

Share in equity

Share of net income

2007

2006

2005

2007

2006

2005

2007

2006

2005

Fovarosi Csatomazasi Muvek

25.00%

25.00%

25.00%

95.7

95.4

93.1

1.0

0.8

1.5

Cie Méridionale de Navigation

45.00%

45.00%

-

34.9

28.0

-

6.9

5.1

-

TIRU

24.00%

24.00%

24.00%

13.1

13.6

10.7

0.1

2.2

(0.8)

Cie Méridionale de Participations

45.00%

45.00%

-

12.5

12.4

-

0.1

-

-

Other amounts < €10 million in 2006 and 2007

   

135.9

91.6

97.7

8.8

(2.1)

5.8

Investments in associates

   

292.1

241.0

201.5

16.9

6.0

6.5




F-37



Back to Contents


Movements in investments in associates in 2007:2009 are as follows:

(€ million)

% control
as of
December 31, 2009

2008

Net
income

Dividend
distribution

Foreign
exchange
translation

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Other

2009

Fovarosi Csatomazasi Muvek

25.00%

92.2

0.1

-

(1.2)

-

-

91.1

Cie Méridionale de Navigation

 

42.8

(10.2)

-

-

(32.6)

-

-

Doshion VWS

30.00%

15.8

0.4

-

0.3

0.3

-

16.8

Cie Méridionale de Participations

 

12.5

(0.0)

-

-

(12.5)

-

-

Stadtereinigung Holtmeyer GmbH

40.00%

12.3

(0.4)

-

-

(0.0)

-

11.9

Berlinwasser China Holding(BWI)

49.00%

6.2

0.2

(0.6)

(1.1)

7.3

-

12.0

TIRU

24.00%

11.4

1.1

-

0.5

-

-

13.0

Regaz (Gaz de Bordeaux)

24.00%

-

4.0

-

-

19.8

-

23.8

Stadtreinigung Dresden GmbH

 

10.1

-

-

-

(10.1)

-

-

Other amounts < €10 million in 2008 and 2009

 

108.2

3.9

(5.4)

(0.3)

(4.9)

(1.6)

99.9

Investments in associates

 

311.6

(0.9)

(6.0)

(1.8)

(32.7)

(1.6)

268.5


(€ million)

% control as of December 31, 2007

2006

Net income

Dividend distribution

Foreign exchange translation

Changes in consolidation scope

Other

2007

Fovarosi Csatomazasi Muvek

25.00%

95.4

1.0

-

(0.7)

-

-

95.7

Cie Méridionale de Navigation

45.00%

28.0

6.9

-

-

-

-

34.9

TIRU

24.00%

13.6

0.1

-

(0.5)

-

(0.1)

13.1

Cie Méridionale de Participations

45.00%

12.4

0.1

-

-

-

-

12.5

Other amounts < €10 million in 2006 and 2007

 

91.6

8.8

(6.5)

(1.8)

43.1

0.7

135.9

Investments in associates

 

241.0

16.9

(6.5)

(3.0)

43.1

0.6

292.1


No material amounts were transferred to Assets classified as held for sale in 2005, 20062007, 2008 or 2007.2009



F-42



Back to Contents


Summarized financial information for the main investments in associates is as follows (100% of amounts):

(€ million)

As of December 31, 2009

As of December 31,2008

As of December 31,2007

Non-current assets

767.6

696.1

870.8

Current assets

438.2

328.1

310.4

Total assets

1,205.8

1,024.2

1,181.2

Equity attributable to owners of the Company

581.5

559.4

618.7

Equity attributable to non-controlling interests

14.5

(1.1)

0.8

Non-current liabilities

223.3

244.2

325.2

Current liabilities

386.5

221.7

236.5

Total equity and liabilities

1,205.8

1,024.2

1,181.2

Consolidated Income Statement

   

Revenue

431.4

456.5

377.6

Operating income

25.8

52.6

31.6

Net income for the year

7.1

34.7

14.9


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Non-current assets

870.8

848.6

4,872.7

Current assets

310.4

256.7

1,414.4

Total assets

1,181.2

1,105.3

6,287.1

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

618.7


586.3


524.0

Minority interests

0.8

1.0

1.4

Non-current liabilities

325.2

263.1

4,735.8

Current liabilities

236.5

254.9

1,025.9

Total equity and liabilities

1,181.2

1,105.3

6,287.1

Income Statement

 

  

Revenue

377.6

329.5

1,085.5

Operating income

31.6

37.2

355.6

Net income for the year

14.9

24.6

37.1

Recap: Movements in investments in associates during 2008 are as follows:

(€ million)

% control as of
December 31, 2008

2007

Net
income

Dividend
distribution

Foreign
exchange
translation

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Other

2008

Fovarosi Csatomazasi Muvek

25.00%

95.7

1.3

-

(4.7)

-

-

92.3

Cie Méridionale de Navigation

45.00%

34.9

7.9

-

-

-

-

42.8

Doshion VWS

30.00%

   

(0.1)

15.9

-

15.8

Cie Méridionale de Participations

45.00%

12.5

-

-

-

-

-

12.5

Stadtereinigung Holtmeyer GmbH

40.00%

-

1.0

-

-

11.3

-

12.3

TIRU

24.00%

13.1

0.1

-

(0.8)

-

(1.0)

11.4

Stadtreinigung Dresden GmbH

49.00%

9.6

1.3

(1.0)

-

2.5

(2.3)

10.1

Other amounts < €10 million in 2007 and 2008

 

126.3

6.9

(6.4)

1.6

(9.5)

(4.5)

114.4

Investments in associates

 

292.1

18.5(1)

(7.4)

(4.0)

20.2

(7.8)

311.6




F-38F-43



Back to Contents


Recap: Movements in investments in associates during 2006:NOTE 9


(€ million)

% control as of December 31, 2006

2005

Net income

Dividend distribution

Foreign exchange translation

Changes in consolidation scope

Other

2006

Fovarosi Csatomazasi Muvek

25.00%

93.1

0.8

-

0.5

-

1.0

95.4

Cie Méridionale de Navigation

45.00%

-

5.1

-

-

22.9

-

28.0

TIRU

24.00%

10.7

2.2

-

0.7

-

-

13.6

Cie Meridionale de Participations

45.00%

-

-

-

-

12.5

(0.1)

12.4

CICG

41.97%

5.6

0.3

-

-

 

-

5.9

KVW Investment Co Ltd

49.00%

5.3

0.8

-

(0.5)

-

(0.1)

5.5

Shanghai Laogang Landfil

30.00%

5.2

0.6

-

(0.4)

-

0.1

5.5

EED ES Tersege Vizikozmu KFT

20.80%

-

0.1

-

-

5.0

-

5.1

TA HO ONYX RSEA ENVT (YUNLIN)

33.30%

-

(4.2)

-

(2.4)

10.4

(0.1)

3.7

Urban Sanitation

50.00%

13.9

-

-

-

(13.9)

-

-

Southern Water Investments Limited

-

17.7

-

-

-

(17.7)

-

-

Other amounts < €5 million in 2005 and 2006

 

50.0

0.3

(4.1)

(2.1)

14.9

6.9

65.9

Investments in associates

 

201.5

6.0

(4.1)

(4.2)

34.1

7.7

241.0


NOTE 9.

Non-consolidated investments

Pursuant to IAS 39, non-consolidated investments are classified as available-for-sale and, as such, recognized at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses are taken directly to equity,other comprehensive income, except for unrealized losses considered long-term which are expensed in the Consolidated Income Statement.

Movements in the fair value of non-consolidated investments during 2007:2009 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of

December 31,2008

Additions

Disposals

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Fair value
adjustments

Impairment
losses(1)

Other

As of

December 31,
2009

Non-consolidated investments

202.8

14.0

(8.4)

(46.3)

9.4

(2.5)

5.6

174.6


(1)

Impairment losses are recorded in financial income and expenses.


(€ million)

As of

December 31, 2006

Additions

Disposals

Changes in consolidation scope

Fair value adjustments

Impairment losses (1)

Other

As of

December 31, 2007

Non-consolidated investments

181.7

51.7

(2.9)

(3.4)

32.6

1.0

(4.6)

256.1

(1) Impairment losses are recorded in financial income and expenses.

As of December 31, 2009, no investment line other than Méditerranea delle Acque exceeds €20 million. The value of this line is €36 million as of December 31, 2009, including fair value adjustments of €9.7 million and the percentage interest is 17.1%.

Changes in consolidation scope primarily concern the first-time consolidation of Regaz (Gaz de Bordeaux).

Recap: non-consolidated investments break down as follows as of December 31, 2008:

(€ million)

% holding
as of
December 31,
2008

Gross
carrying
amount as of
December
31, 2008

Impairment
losses(2)

Fair value
adjustments

Net
carrying
amount as of
December 31,
2008

Net
carrying
amount as of
December 31,
2007

Méditerranea delle Acque(1)

17.1%

26.3

-

2.0

28.3

55.8

Avacon

-

-

-

-

-

26.6

Domino Sanepar

-

-

-

-

-

20.6

Gaz de Bordeaux(1)

24.0%

17.5

-

11.7

29.2

20.4

Net carrying amount per unit
< €20 million in 2008 and 2007

 

163.2

(19.7)

1.8

145.3

132.7

Non-consolidated investments

 

207.0

(19.7)

15.5

202.8

256.1


(1)

Investment not consolidated as not satisfying the “significant influence” criteria.

(2)

Impairment losses recognized in the period are recorded in financial income and expenses.


Recap: Movements in non-consolidated investments during 2008 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December 31,
2007

Additions

Disposals

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Fair value
adjustments

Impairment
losses(1)

Other

As of
December 31,
2008

Non-consolidated investments

256.1

45.4

(49.5)

(30.2)

(18.6)

1.2

(1.6)

202.8


(1)

Impairment losses recognized in the period are recorded in financial income and expenses.


Fair value adjustments

mainly concern Mediterranea Delle Acque shares in the amount of €29.8 million.



F-39F-44



Back to Contents


Non-consolidated investments break down as follows:NOTE 10


 (€ million)

% holding as of December 31, 2007

Gross carrying amount as of December 31, 2007

Impairment losses

Fair value adjustments

Net carrying amount as of December 31, 2007

Net carrying amount as of December 31, 2006

Net carrying amount as of December 31, 2005

Méditerranea delle Acque (formerly Genova Acque) (1)

17.1%

26.3

-

29.5

55.8

26.0

25.7

Avacon (1)

1.3%

25.0

-

1.6

26.6

25.0

-

Domino Sanepar (1)

15.0%

20.7

-

(0.1)

20.6

20.7

20.7

Gaz de Bordeaux (1)

24.0%

17.5

-

2.9

20.4

19.3

4.6

SEBS - GmbH (2)

-

-

-

-

-

-

27.0

Net carrying amount per unit < €20 million in 2007 and 2006

 

154.6

(22.1)

0.2

132.7

90.7

131.5

Non-consolidated investments

 

244.1

(22.1)

34.1

256.1

181.7

209.5

(1)

Investment not consolidated as do not satisfy the "significant influence" criteria.

(2)

Company consolidated in 2006.


Recap: Movements in non-consolidated investments during 2006:


(€ million)

As of

December 31, 2005

Additions

Disposals

Changes in consolidation scope

Fair value adjustments

Impairment losses (1)

Other

As of

December 31,2006

Non-consolidated investments

209.5

33.2

(11.9)

(65.7)

0.8

(2.5)

18.3

181.7

(1)

Impairment losses are recorded in financial income and expenses.

Acquisitions mainly concern the acquisition of an additional 8% interest in Gaz de Bordeaux by the Energy Services Division for a consideration of €12.8 million.

The principal disposal was the sale of Ecofin (United Kingdom) shares held by the Water Division in the amount of -€6.6 million.

Changes in consolidation scope mainly concern the consolidation in 2006 of the company carrying the Hradec Kralove contract (Water Division, Czech Republic) and SEBS (Water Division, Germany) for -€14.8 million and -€27 million respectively and Ta-Ho Yunlin (Environmental Services Division, China) for -€10.0 million.

Other movements concern the reclassification of an investment previously recorded in "Other long-term investments".



F-40



Back to Contents


NOTE 10.

Non-current and current operating financial assets

Operating financial assets comprise financial assets resulting from the application of IFRIC 12 on accounting for concession arrangements and from the application of IFRIC 4 (see Note 1.22)1.21).


Movements in the net carrying amount of non-current and current operating financial assets during2007: 2009 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December 31,2008

New
financial assets

Repayments/
disposals

Impairment
losses(1)

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign
exchange
translation

Non-current/
current
reclassification

Other

As of
December 31, 2009

Gross

5,311.5

467.7

(7.4)

-

(94.9)

34.6

(365.4)

(21.1)

5,325.0

Impairment losses

(12.6)

-

-

(37.4)

-

0.2

-

-

(49.8)

Non-current operating financial assets

5,298.9

467.7

(7.4)

(37.4)

(94.9)

34.8

(365.4)

(21.1)

5,275.2

Gross

452.3

7.8

(447.8)

-

(6.0)

3.5

365.4

4.8

380.0

Impairment losses

-

-

-

(3.4)

-

-

-

-

(3.4)

Current operating financial assets

452.3

7.8

(447.8)

(3.4)

(6.0)

3.5

365.4

4.8

376.6

Non-current and current operating financial assets

5,751.2

475.5

(455.2)

(40.8)

(100.9)

38.3

-

(16.3)

5,651.8


(1)

Impairment losses are recorded in operating income


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2006

New financial assets

Repayments/ disposals

Impairment losses (1)

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Non-current / current reclassification

Other

As of

December 31, 2007

Gross

5,139.4

414.2

(36.4)

-

212.8

(98.3)

(355.9)

2.6

5,278.4

Impairment losses

(6.0)

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(6.0)

Non-current operating financial assets

5,133.4

414.2

(36.4)

-

212.8

(98.3)

(355.9)

2.6

5,272.4

Gross

326.2

6.3

(324.3)

-

5.0

(4.5)

355.9

(9.4)

355.2

Impairment losses

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Current operating financial assets

326.2

6.3

(324.3)

-

5.0

(4.5)

355.9

(9.4)

355.2

Non-current and current operating financial assets

5,459.6

420.5

(360.7)

-

217.8

(102.8)

-

(6.8)

5,627.6

(1)

Impairment losses are recorded in operating income.


The principalnew operating financial assets in 20072009 mainly concern:

the Water Division and in particular projects in Berlin (€140.8 million), the Oman Sur BOT contract (€46.8 million) and the Veolia Water Hynix industrial contract in Korea (€26.2119.6 million);

the Energy Services Division and in particular cogeneration plants (€19.573.9 million).

The principalrepayments of operating financial assets in 20072009 concern:

the Water Division and in particular projects in Berlin (-€139.5140.1 million);

the Energy Services Division and in particular cogeneration plants (-€60.9132.7 million).

Foreign exchange translation gains losseson non-current operating financial assets mainly concern the Water Division (-€60.1 million) and the Environmental Services Division (-€41.1(€18.6 million) and the Water Division (€8.7 million), following the depreciationappreciation of the Korean won, the U.S. dollarpound sterling and the pound sterlingKorean won against the euro.

Changes in consolidation scope mainly concern the acquisitionsale of VSA Tecnitaliawaste-to-energy activities in the United States by the EnergyEnvironmental Services Division for €222.5in the amount of -€41.3 million and changes in consolidation method (from full to proportionate consolidation) of the Water Division in North Africa and the Middle East in the amount of -€59.1 million.

OtherImpairment losses movements primarilymainly concern the reclassificationEnvironmental Services Division following the impairment of financial assets as “concession intangible assets” following IFRIC 12 analysesa contract in Italy in the Water, Energy Services and Environmental Services Divisions.amount of €38.6 million (including €35.2 million in non-current).





F-41F-45



Back to Contents



The breakdown of operating financial assets by division is as follows:

 

As of December 31,

 

Non-current

Current

Total

(€ million)

2009

2008

2007

2009

2008

2007

2009

2008

2007

Water

3,870.3

3,851.0

3,719.4

188.8

232.2

165.1

4,059.1

4,083.2

3,884.5

Environmental Services

711.8

768.4

858.1

42.8

68.6

44.3

754.6

837.0

902.4

Energy Services

528.4

562.0

585.4

126.0

117.4

126.9

654.4

679.4

712.3

Transportation

86.7

71.6

104.3

18.7

33.9

18.7

105.4

105.5

123.0

Other

78.0

45.9

5.2

0.3

0.2

0.2

78.3

46.1

5.4

Operating financial assets

5,275.2

5,298.9

5,272.4

376.6

452.3

355.2

5,651.8

5,751.2

5,627.6


(€ million)

As of December 31,

Non-current assets

Current assets

Total

2007

2006

2005

2007

2006

2005

2007

2006

2005

Water

3,719.4

3,667.0

3,808.1

165.1

163.5

55.2

3,884.5

3,830.5

3,863.3

Environmental Services

858.1

711.2

730.5

44.3

25.8

18.7

902.4

737.0

749.2

Energy Services

585.4

651.0

709.1

126.9

120.1

113.0

712.3

771.1

822.1

Transportation

104.3

98.8

83.5

18.7

16.6

20.9

123.0

115.4

104.4

Other

5.2

5.4

6.2

0.2

0.2

0.2

5.4

5.6

6.4

Operating financial assets

5,272.4

5,133.4

5,337.4

355.2

326.2

208.0

5,627.6

5,459.6

5,545.4



IFRIC 12 operating financial assets maturity schedule:


(€ million)

1 year

2 years

3 to 5 years

More than five years

Total

Water

145.1

171.2

570.1

2,610.5

3,496.9

Environmental Services

35.1

24.1

142.5

617.9

819.6

Energy Services

16.4

14.7

21.0

29.9

82.0

Transportation

18.7

19.4

25.2

59.7

123.0

Other

0.2

0.5

1.1

3.6

5.4

Total

215.5

229.9

759.9

3,321.6

4,526.9


(€ million)

1 year

2 to 3 years

4 to 5 years

More than five years

Total

Water

165.1

359.0

367.9

2,723.6

3,615.6

Environmental Services

40.9

107.4

116.4

461.1

725.8

Energy Services

5.2

26.6

7.5

30.0

69.3

Transportation

18.7

37.0

12.2

24.6

92.5

Other

0.3

-

-

4.7

5.0

Total

230.2

530.0

504.0

3,244.0

4,508.2


IFRIC 4 operating financial assets maturity schedule:


(€ million)

1 year

2 years

3 to 5 years

More than five years

Total

1 year

2 to 3 years

4 to 5 years

More than five years

Total

Water

20.0

25.0

89.0

253.6

387.6

23.7

54.0

65.1

300.7

443.5

Environmental Services

9.2

9.5

28.6

35.5

82.8

1.9

8.5

9.1

9.3

28.8

Energy Services

110.5

125.3

241.3

153.2

630.3

120.9

182.2

74.3

207.7

585.1

Transportation

-

-

-

3.6

5.9

3.4

12.9

Other

-

-

-

-

-

73.3

73.3

Total

139.7

159.8

358.9

442.3

1,100.7

146.5

248.3

154.4

594.4

1,143.6




F-42F-46



Back to Contents


Recap: Movements in the net carrying amount of non-current and current operating financial assets during 2006:2008 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December
31, 2007

New
financial
assets

Repayments/
disposals

Impairment
losses

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign
exchange
translation

Non-current /
current
reclassification

Other

As of
December
31, 2008

Gross

5,278.4

551.0

(3.2)

-

87.8

(129.6)

(453.2)

(19.7)

5,311.5

Impairment losses

(6.0)

-

-

(6.4)

-

(0.2)

-

-

(12.6)

Non-current operating financial assets

5,272.4

551.0

(3.2)

(6.4)

87.8

(129.8)

(453.2)

(19.7)

5,298.9

Gross

355.2

1.7

(355.0)

-

5.4

(8.7)

453.2

0.5

452.3

Impairment losses

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Current operating financial assets

355.2

1.7

(355.0)

-

5.4

(8.7)

453.2

0.5

452.3

Non-current and current operating financial assets

5,627.6

552.7

(358.2)

(6.4)

93.2

(138.5)

-

(19.2)

5,751.2


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

New financial assets

Repayments/ disposals

Impairment losses (1)

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2006

Gross

5,547.6

360.6

(438.1)

-

12.7

(40.8)

23.6

5,465.6

Impairment losses

(2.2)

-

-

(3.9)

-

0.2

(0.1)

(6.0)

Non-current and current operating financial assets

5,545.4

360.6

(438.1)

(3.9)

12.7

(40.6)

23.5

5,459.6

(1)

Impairment losses are recorded in operating income.

The principalnew operating financial assets in 20062008 mainly concern:

the Water Division and in particular projects in Berlin (€115.2113.9 million), the BrusselsOman Sur BOT contract (€62.963.4 million) and the Haye BOTBrussels Aquiris contract (€27.240.2 million);

the Energy Services Division and in particular cogeneration plants in France (€45.158.2 million).

The principalrepayments of operating financial assets in 20062008 concern:

the Water Division and in particular projects in Berlin (-€130.8 million) and the Brussels BOT contract (-€95.3135.3 million);

the Energy Services Division and in particular cogeneration plants in France (-€112.496.6 million).

Other movementsForeign exchange translation losses mainly concern transfers from non-current financial receivables to operating financial assets.the Water Division (-€45.0 million) and the Environmental Services Division (-€85.5 million), following the depreciation of the Korean won, the Chinese renminbi yuan and the pound sterling against the euro.


Changes in consolidation scope mainly concern the Water Division and the acquisition of a joint investment in Veolia Israel (Ashkelon contract) in the amount of €98.4 million.

NOTE 11.11

Other non-current and current financial assets

 

As of December 31,

(€ million)

Non-current

Current

Total

 

2009

2008

2007

2009

2008

2007

2009

2008

2007

Gross

774.8

803.0

572.6

195.8

283.3

174.1

970.6

1,086.3

746.7

Impairment losses

(73.5)

(63.4)

(57.6)

(31.9)

(27.9)

(21.3)

(105.4)

(91.2)

(78.9)

Financial assets in loans and receivables

701.3

739.6

515.0

163.9

255.4

152.8

865.2

995.0

667.9

Other financial assets

52.6

77.7

231.0

53.8

66.0

177.2

106.4

143.7

408.2

Total other financial assets, net

753.9

817.3

746.0

217.7

321.4

330.0

971.6

1,138.7

1,076.1




F-47



OtherBack to Contents


11.1

Movements in other non-current financial assets

Movements in the value of other non-current financial assets during 2007:2009 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December
31,2008

Additions

Repayments/
disposals

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Impairment
losses(1)

Foreign
exchange
translation

Non-current /
current
reclassification

Other

As of
December
31, 2009

Gross

803.0

50.7

(68.6)

31.2

-

3.2

(14.7)

(30.0)

774.8

Impairment losses

(63.4)

-

-

(0.1)

(9.9)

2.0

0.1

(2.2)

(73.5)

Non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

739.6

50.7

(68.6)

31.1

(9.9)

5.2

(14.6)

(32.2)

701.3

Other non-current financial assets

77.7

10.9

(4.5)

(8.2)

(0.5)

2.0

(3.2)

(21.6)

52.6

Total Other non-current financial assets, net

817.3

61.6

(73.1)

22.9

(10.4)

7.2

(17.8)

(53.8)

753.9


(1)

Impairment losses are recorded in financial income and expenses.


(€ million)

As of

December 31, 2006

Additions

Repayments/ disposals

Changes in consolidation scope

Impairment losses (1)

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of

December 31, 2007

Gross

604.8

66.2

(69.5)

(4.0)

-

(5.5)

(19.4)

572.6

Impairment losses

(58.8)

-

-

(0.4)

(0.2)

6.0

(4.2)

(57.6)

Non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

546,0

66.2

(69.5)

(4.4)

(0.2)

0.5

(23.6)

515.0

Other non-current financial assets

91.5

161.2

(16.3)

18.6

(1.8)

(7.5)

(14.7)

231.0

Total Other non-current financial assets

637.5

227.4

(85.8)

14.2

(2.0)

(7.0)

(38.3)

746.0

(1)

Impairment losses are recorded in financial income and expenses.


Non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

Repayments mainly correspond to the change in the non-Group portion of the loan to Dalkia International for €43 million.

Changes in consolidation scope are mainly the result of a change in consolidation method (from full to proportionate consolidation) of the Water Division in North Africa and the Middle East for €48.4 million.

Other movements concern the reclassification of balances in “Assets classified as held for sale” in the amount of -€15.4 million, mainly in the Transportation Division.

As of December 31, 2009, the principal non-current financial assets in loans and receivables primarily correspond to the non-Group portion of loans granted to companies consolidated on a proportionate basis for €450.4 million (mainly Dalkia International and its subsidiaries).

Other non-current financial assets

Other non-current financial assets are classified as “Available-for-sale assets” in accordance with the principles set out in Note 1.15.2.

Other movements mainly concern the transfer of financial assets hedging pension obligations to the new operator, following the loss of a contract in Melbourne by the Transportation Division.

Recap: movements in the value of other non-current financial assets during 2008 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December
31,2007

Additions

Repayments/
disposals

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Impairment
losses(1)

Foreign
exchange
translation

Non-current /
current
reclassification

Other

As of
December
31, 2008

Gross

572.6

262.0

(30.6)

18.2

-

(20.0)

(6.6)

7.4

803.0

Impairment losses

(57.6)

-

-

0.3

(3.4)

(3.0)

-

0.3

(63.4)

Non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

515.0

262.0

(30.6)

18.5

(3.4)

(23.0)

(6.6)

7.7

739.6

Other non-current financial assets

231.0

35.5

(10.3)

(33.0)

(1.9)

(7.6)

-

(136.0)

77.7

Total Other non-current financial assets, net

746.0

297.5

(40.9)

(14.5)

(5.3)

(30.6)

(6.6)

(128.3)

817.3


(1)

Impairment losses are recorded in financial income and expenses.



F-43F-48



Back to Contents


Non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

Additions mainly correspond to the change in the non-Group portion of the loan to Dalkia International for €39.1€208.6 million.

As ofDecember 31, 20072008, the principal non-current financial assets in loans and receivables primarily correspond to the non-Group portion of loans granted to companies consolidated on a proportionate basis for €238.7€434.2 million (mainly Dalkia International)(Dalkia International and its subsidiaries).

Other non-current financial assets

Other non-current financial assets are recordedclassified as available-for-sale assets.“Available-for-sale assets” in accordance with the principles set out in Note 1.15.2.

AdditionsOther movements mainly correspond toconcern the non current partuse of anthe investment underplaced in an escrow account with a view toin 2007, in the amount of €94.7 million, on the acquisition of Tianjin Shibei shares in China for €113.2 million (Water Division).

11.2

Movements in current financial assets

Movements in other current financial assets during 2009 are as follows:



(€ million)

As of
December
31,2008

Changes
in
business

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Fair value
adjustments

Impairment
losses(1)

Foreign
exchange
translation

Non-current /
current
reclassification

Other

As of
December
31, 2009

Gross

283.3

(141.3)

15.0

-

-

0.1

14.6

24.1

195.8

Impairment losses

(27.9)

-

0.1

-

(6.1)

0.1

(0.2)

2.1

(31.9)

Current financial assets in loans and receivables

255.4

(141.3)

15.1

-

(6.1)

0.2

14.4

26.2

163.9

Other current financial assets

66.0

3.7

(0.7)

(0.2)

(0.4)

(0.5)

3.2

(17.3)

53.8

Total other current financial assets, net

321.4

(137.6)

14.4

(0.2)

(6.5)

(0.3)

17.6

8.9

217.7


(1)

Impairment losses are recorded in financial income and expenses.


The accounting treatment of other current financial assets in loans and receivables complies with the required treatment of loans and receivables as defined by IAS 39.

Other financial assets are treated as available-for-sale assets for accounting purposes.

Other net current financial assets as of December 31, 2009 of €217.7 million primarily comprise the pre-financing of assets in the Transportation Divisions for €62.3 million.

Recap: movements notably concern  the non-Group portionin other current financial assets during 2008 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December
31,2007

Changes
in
business

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Fair value
adjustments

Impairment
losses(1)

Foreign
exchange
translation

Non-current /
current
reclassification

Other

As of
December
31, 2008

Gross

174.1

90.7

(8.4)

-

-

1.3

6.6

19.0

283.3

Impairment losses

(21.3)

-

(0.3)

-

(4.4)

-

-

(1.9)

(27.9)

Current financial assets in loans and receivables

152.8

90.7

(8.7)

-

(4.4)

1.3

6.6

17.1

255.4

Other current financial assets

177.2

6.9

(12.4)

(0.3)

(3.4)

(5.6)

-

(96.4)

66.0

Total other current financial assets, net

330.0

97.6

(21.1)

(0.3)

(7.8)

(4.3)

6.6

(79.3)

321.4


(1)

Impairment losses are recorded in financial income and expenses.


Other current financial assets as of December 31, 2008 of €321.4 million primarily comprise loans granted to proportionately consolidatednon-consolidated companies for -€50.9in the Water division of €42.2 million, (mainly Dalkiafunds placed in an escrow account with a view to acquisitions in the Water and Berlin)Energy Services Divisions of €64.7 million and the reclassification in non-current financialpre-financing of assets of repayment entitlements relating to benefits granted to Australian employees in the Transportation Division for +€23.0of €122.8 million.

Recap: Movements in the value of other non-current financial assets during 2006:

(€ million)

As of

December 31, 2005

Additions

Repayments/ disposals

Changes in consolidation scope

Impairment losses (1)

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of

December 31, 2006

Gross

496.0

69.4

(29.2)

2.7

-

(15.3)

(21.6)

502.0

Impairment losses

(67.6)

-

-

-

2.4

6.6

-

(58.6)

Other long-term loans, net

428.4

69.4

(29.2)

2.7

2.4

(8.7)

(21.6)

443.4

Gross

279.4

27.8

(22.3)

(45.5)

-

(3.2)

(29.7)

206.5

Impairment losses

(16.2)

-

-

-

3.4

0.4

-

(12.4)

Other investments, net

263.2

27.8

(22.3)

(45.5)

3.4

(2.8)

(29.7)

194.1

Other non-current financial assets, net

691.6

97.2

(51.5)

(42.8)

5.8

(11.5)

(51.3)

637.5

(1)

Impairment losses are recorded in financial income and expenses.


Other long-term loans, net

Additions mainly correspond to the non-Group portion of a loan granted to a proportionately consolidated company.

Other movements concern the transfer of assets to operating financial assets.

Other long-term loans as ofDecember 31, 2006 mainly include:

a deposit paid in respect of the Berlin contract held by Veolia Wasser GmbH (Water Division, Germany) of €97.3 million;

Water Division loans of €22 million in the United States;

payment guarantee deposits of €36.7 million and other deposits of €20.9 million;

the non-Group portion of loans granted to proportionately consolidated companies of €160.2 million.

Cumulatedimpairment losses on other long-term loans mainly include the impairment of Water Division long-term loans in the U.S. in the cumulative amount of -€57.1 million as of December 31, 2006 and -€63.7 million as of December 31, 2005 (the decrease is mainly due to changes in the U.S. dollar exchange rate).



F-44F-49



Back to Contents


Other investments, netNOTE 12

Changes in the scope of consolidation include the escrow accounts intended to finance Water Division investments in China in the amount of -€45.4 million (€21.1 million in respect of the Kunming contract and €24.3 million in respect of the Changhou contract), the impact of the sale of Southern Water preferential shares in the amount of -€66.3 million and a collateral guarantee including an advance from the French State to SNCM in the amount of €38.5 million.

Othermovements notably concern the transfer of other investments to Non-consolidated investments.

Other investments as ofDecember 31, 2006 mainly include:

guarantee deposits paid to suppliers and others in the amount of €14.9 million;

pension funds and other employee-related obligations in the amount of €35.8 million;

collateral guarantees including an advance from the French State to SNCM in the Transportation Division (+€38.5 million).

No amounts were transferred to Assets classified as held for sale in 2004, 2005 or 2006.


NOTE 12.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities

Movements in deferred tax assets and liabilities during 2007:2009 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of December 31, 2006

Changes in business through profit and loss

Changes in business through equity

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2007

As of
December
31, 2008

Changes in
business
through
net income

Changes in
business
through
equity

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign
exchange
translation

Other

As of
December
31, 2009

Deferred tax assets, gross

1,787.6

167.3

(19.9)

186.2

(73.0)

(10.7)

2,037.5

2,150.2

165.3

9.2

(30.8)

3.2

26.3

2,323.4

Deferred tax assets not recognized

(431.9)

(140.4)

(10.3)

0.9

5.7

6.6

(569.4)

(570.7)

(71.7)

2.5

25.7

(6.5)

(81.4)

(702.1)

Deferred tax assets, net

1,355.7

26.9

(30.2)

187.1

(67.3)

(4.1)

1,468.1

1,579.5

93.6

11.7

(5.1)

(3.3)

(55.1)

1,621.3

Deferred tax liabilities

1,504.9

30.7

5.8

328.7

(70.7)

(4.7)

1,794.7

1,936.0

30.4

(0.1)

(15.3)

20.2

(20.0)

1,951.2


As of December 31, 2007,2009, the tax group in the United States has ordinary tax losses carried forward, relating to the restructuring of Water businesses in 2006 and associated with losses incurred by the former activities of U.S. Filter. These tax losses, which may exceed U.S.$4 billion, are currently being reviewed by the U.S. tax authorities, at the request of the company, which considers the validity of these tax losses to be established, based on external appraisals. A deferred tax asset of U.S.$365407 million (€248283 million) is recognized in the balance sheetConsolidated Statement of Financial Position in respect of these tax losses as of December 31, 2007.2009, compared to U.S.$434 million (€312 million) as of December 31, 2008.

As a resultThis decrease is mainly due to the sale of waste-to-energy activities in the USA which decreased the future taxation of the new tax schedule, notably integrating flows relating to Thermal North America Inc.Group (€64 million), partially offset by the Group recognized anrecognition of additional deferred tax assetassets of €85€43 million duringin respect of other activities, enabled by the year.tax schedule.

Conversely, the French tax group offset tax losses brought forward and previously capitalized.capitalized in the amount of €46 million.

Changes in business through equity mainly include the tax effect of fair value adjustments and actuarial gains and losses.

Changes in consolidation scope mainly concern the entry intosale of VPNM in the scopeEnvironmental Services Division in the amount of consolidation of the Sulo Group for €112-€2.8 million in gross deferred tax assets and €149the sale of Freight activities in the Transportation Division in the amount of -€8.5 million in liabilities, of Thermal North America Inc. for €20 million in assets and €44 million in liabilities and of VSA Tecnitalia for €27 million in liabilities and the impact of the fair value measurement of the Lanzhou and Haikou contracts for €27 million and €20 million in liabilities, respectively.liabilities.

Foreign exchange translation gains and losses losses are mainly due to the depreciation offluctuations in the U.S. dollar and the pound sterling against the euro.

Other movements are due to the impact on the U.S. tax group of the sale of waste-to-energy activities in the United States in the amount of -€64.8 million and the reclassification of certain subsidiaries in “Assets classified as held for sale” and “Liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale”. The deferred tax assets and liabilities of these subsidiaries were reclassified in the amount of -€12.5 million and - €31.8 million respectively.



F-45F-50



Back to Contents


Deferred tax assets and liabilitiesbreak down byliabilities natureas follows:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Deferred tax assets

   

Employee benefits

134.6

172.4

137.6

Impairment provisions

27.6

16.6

13.5

Tax losses

851.0

775.4

689.9

Finance leases / Assets

31.4

34.1

51.6

Temporary differences on provisions

310.5

255.5

175.4

Other deductible temporary differences

682.4(1)

533.6

524.7

Deferred tax assets, gross

2,037.5

1,787.6

1,592.7

Deferred tax assets not recognized

(569.4)

(431.9)

(458.0)

Recognized deferred tax assets

1,468.1

1,355.7

1,134.7

(1)

including DTA on concessions of €107 million, on fair value adjustments of €88 million and on financial instruments of €106 million.


(€ million)

As of December
31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Deferred tax liabilities

   

Deferred tax on amortization/depreciation differentials

662.0

553.6

540.6

Asset remeasurement

497.2

389.4

231.0

Finance leases / Liabilities

18.9

27.4

46.1

Other taxable temporary differences

616.6

534.5

387.3

Deferred tax liabilities

1,794.7

1,504.9

1,205.0


Deferred tax assets and liabilities break down bydestination nature as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31,2007

Deferred tax assets

   

Tax losses

976.2

895.3

851.0

Provisions and impairment losses

401.6

368.4

374.1

Employee benefits

219.3

187.0

134.6

Financial instruments

159.0

142.5

106.0

Operating financial assets

112.5

106.1

107.5

Fair value remeasurement of assets purchased

65.8

79.3

88.5

Foreign exchange translation

8.5

17.9

8.0

Finance leases

34.5

34.2

31.4

Intangible assets and Property, plant and equipment

28.7

21.8

20.5

Other

317.3

297.7

315.9

Deferred tax assets, gross

2,323.4

2,150.2

2,037.5

Deferred tax assets not recognized

(702.1)

(570.7)

(569.4)

Recognized deferred tax assets

1,621.3

1,579.5

1,468.1


(€ million)

As of December
31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Deferred tax assets, net

   

Deferred tax assets on net income

1,400.5

1,276.7

970.3

Deferred tax assets on reserves

67.6

79.0

164.4

Deferred tax assets, net

1,468.1

1,355.7

1,134.7

Deferred tax liabilities

   

Deferred tax liabilities on net income

1,755.1

1,476.4

1,147.9

Deferred tax liabilities on reserves

39.6

28.5

57.1

Deferred tax liabilities

1,794.7

1,504.9

1,205.0

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31,2007

Deferred tax liabilities

   

Intangible assets and Property, plant and equipment

799.2

676.6

662.0

Fair value remeasurement of assets purchased

245.2

276.4

310.1

Operating financial assets

192.5

191.5

187.1

Financial instruments

91.2

89.2

48.4

Finance leases

88.9

76.1

18.9

Provisions

47.1

56.8

52.9

Foreign exchange translation

11.7

38.9

23.0

Employee benefits

36.9

19.0

4.3

Other

438.5

511.5

488.0

Deferred tax liabilities

1,951.2

1,936.0

1,794.7




F-46F-51



Back to Contents


Deferred tax onassets and liabilities break down by destination as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31,2007

Deferred tax assets, net

   

Deferred tax assets on net income

1,471.5

1,433.8

1,400.5

Deferred tax assets on reserves

149.9

145.7

67.6

Deferred tax assets, net

1,621.3

1,579.5

1,468.1

Deferred tax liabilities

 

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities on net income

1,900.5

1,876.8

1,755.1

Deferred tax liabilities on reserves

50.7

59.2

39.6

Deferred tax liabilities

1,951.2

1,936.0

1,794.7


Theexpiry schedule for tax losses not recognized as of December 31, 2007 becomes time-barred2009 is as follows:


(€ million)

Maturity

Total

≤ 5 years

 > 5 years

Unlimited

Gross tax losses

15.0

44.8

379.8

439.6

 

Expiry

Total

(€ million)

≤ 5 years

 > 5 years

Unlimited

Tax losses not recognized

14.6

96.3

446.6

557.5


Recap: Movements in deferred tax assets and liabilities during 2006:2008 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of December 31, 2007

Changes in business through net income

Changes in business through equity

Changes in consolidation
scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2008

Deferred tax assets, gross

2,037.5

18.7

71.7

26.6

13.2

(17.5)

2,150.2

Deferred tax assets not recognized

(569.4)

(2.2)

(11.3)

1.6

11.0

(0.4)

(570.7)

Deferred tax assets, net

1,468.1

16.5

60.4

28.2

24.2

(17.9)

1,579.5

Deferred tax liabilities

1,794.7

101.6

12.2

127.3

(85.4)

(14.4)

1,936.0


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

Change in business through profit or loss

Changes in business through profit and loss

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2006

Deferred tax assets, gross

1,592.7

71.2

(14.2)

109.3

(24.4)

53.0

1,787.6

Deferred tax assets not recognized

(458.0)

11 .7

0.3

-

8.0

6.1

(431.9)

Deferred tax assets, net

1,134.7

82.9

(13.9)

109.3

(16.4)

59.1

1,355.7

Deferred tax liabilities

1,205.0

98.0

15.9

140.3

(13.2)

58.9

1,504.9


NOTE 13.13

Working capital

Movements in net working capital during 2007:2009 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of

December 31, 2006

Changes in business

Impairment losses

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of

December 31, 2007

As of
December
31,2008

Changes
in
business

Impairment
losses

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign
exchange
translation

Reclassification
in assets /
liabilities
classified as
held for sale

Other

As of
December
31, 2009

Inventories and work-in-progress, net

731.8

62.3

(1.5)

53.2

(8.7)

2.3

839.4

1,022.0

16.2

6.1

(3.6)

4.4

(53.5)

5.7

997.3

Operating receivables, net

10,968.7

1,115.9

(10.1)

514.6

(141.6)

11.9

12,459.4

13,093.2

(407.7)

(82.3)

(219.8)

95.5

(107.6)

(123.8)

12,247.5

Operating payables, net

11,268.6

1,135.8

-

568.8

(151.1)

122.7

12,944.8

13,591.8

(99.7)

-

(227.9)

105.3

(174.7)

(119.1)

13,075.7

Net working capital

431.9

42.4

(11.6)

(1.0)

0.8

(108.5)

354.0

523.4

(291.8)

(76.2)

4.5

(5.4)

13.6

1.0

169.1


Net working capital of €2.5 million wasThe amount transferred to Assets“Assets classified as held for sale (GMA/Sulo business in the Environmental Services Division), compared to €22.3 million (Danish transportation activities) in 2006.

No amounts were transferred to Liabilitiessale” and “Liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for salesale” primarily concerns waste-to-energy activities in 2007. €20.2 million was reclassifiedthe United States in liabilities in 2006 (in respect of Danish transportation activities).the Environmental Services Division and Renewable Energy activities.



F-52



Back to Contents


Net working capital includes “operating” working capital (inventories, trade receivables, trade payables and other operating receivables and payables)payables, tax receivables and payables other than current tax), “tax” working capital (current tax receivables and payables) and “investment” working capital (receivables and payables in respect of capital expenditure). ChangesMovements in business neteach of impairment losses of €30.8 million comprise a movement of €167.1 million in operatingthese working capital categories in 2009 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December
31,2008

Changes
in
business

Impairment
losses

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign
exchange
translation

Reclassification
in assets /
liabilities
classified as held
for sale

Other

As of
December
31, 2009

Inventories and work-in-progress, net

1,022.0

16.2

6.1

(3.6)

4.4

(53.5)

5.7

997.3

Operating receivables (including tax receivables other than current tax)

12,844.4

(434.7)

(82.5)

(217.1)

89.0

(92.7)

(59.6)

12,046.8

Operating payables (including tax payables other than current tax)

(12,791.9)

62.7

-

207.2

(94.3)

73.5

42.3

(12,500.5)

Operating working capital

1,074.5

(355.8)

(76.4)

(13.5)

(0.9)

(72.7)

(11.6)

543.6

Tax receivables (current tax)

227.0

31.4

-

(2.7)

6.5

(13.3)

(59.2)

189.7

Tax payables (current tax)

(324.7)

(19.0)

-

(1.7)

(12.3)

72.1

64.8

(220.8)

Tax working capital

(97.7)

12.4

-

(4.4)

(5.8)

58.8

5.6

(31.1)

Receivables on non-current asset disposals

21.8

(4.4)

0.2

0.0

-

(1.6)

(5.0)

11

Capital expenditure payables

(475.2)

56.0

-

22.4

1.3

29.1

12.0

(354.4)

Investment working capital

(453.4)

51.6

0.2

22.4

1.3

27.5

7.0

(343.4)

Net working capital

523.4

(291.8)

(76.2)

4.5

(5.4)

13.6

1.0

169.1


Movements in inventories during2009 are as follows:

Stocks


(€ million)

As of
December
31,2008

Changes
in
business

Impairment
losses

Reversal of
impairment
losses

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign
exchange
translation

Reclassification
in assets /
liabilities
classified as held
for sale

Other

As of
December
31, 2009

Raw materials and supplies

635.3

16.0

-

-

(6.6)

5.1

(12.5)

(6.4)

630.9

Work-in-progress

329.3

1.4

-

-

(0.4)

(1.8)

(42.7)

1.3

287.1

Other inventories(1)

139.4

(1.2)

-

-

3.0

2.3

0.1

10.6

154.2

Inventories and work-in-progress, gross

1,104.0

16.2

-

-

(4.0)

5.6

(55.1)

5.5

1 ,072.2

Impairment losses on inventories and work-in-progress

(82.0)

-

(36.5)

42.6

0.4

(1.2)

1.6

0.2

(74.9)

Inventories and work-in-progress, net

1,022.0

16.2

(36.5)

42.6

(3.6)

4.4

(53.5)

5.7

997.3


(1) Including CO2 inventory


Inventories mainly concern the Water Division in the amount of €22.9€335.5 million and the Energy Services Division in tax working capital andthe amount of -€159.2 million in investment working capital.€389.2 million.



F-47F-53



Back to Contents


Movements in inventories during 2007:

Inventories


(€ million)

As of

December 31, 2006

Changes in business

Impairment losses

Reversals of impairment losses

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of

December 31, 2007

Raw materials and supplies

452.6

47.4

-

-

24.0

(5.4)

8.0

526.6

Work-in-progress

237.4

1.4

-

-

15.7

(2.1)

4.9

257.3

Other inventories

81.0

13.5

-

-

14.0

(1.4)

(10.4)

96.7

Inventories and work-in-progress, gross

771.0

62.3

-

-

53.7

(8.9)

2.5

880.6

Impairment losses on raw materials and supplies

(30.3)

-

(7.0)

4.7

(0.4)

0.1

(0.3)

(33.2)

Impairment losses on work-in-progress

(0.8)

-

(1.0)

0.4

-

-

-

(1.4)

Impairment losses on other inventories

(8.1)

-

(1.5)

2.9

(0.1)

0.1

0.1

(6.6)

Impairment losses on inventories and work-in-progress

(39.2)

-

(9.5)

8.0

(0.5)

0.2

(0.2)

(41.2)

Inventories and work-in-progress, net

731.8

62.3

(9.5)

8.0

53.2

(8.7)

2.3

839.4


Movements in operating receivables during 2007:2009are as follows:

Operating receivables


(€ million)

As of

December 31, 2006

Changes in business

Impairment losses (1)

Reversals of impairment losses  (1)

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of

December 31, 2007

Trade receivables

8,939.3

571.5

-

-

423.2

(114.7)

(5.6)

9,813.7

Impairment losses on trade receivables

(448.7)

-

(166.4)

126.5

(33.6)

9.2

3.0

(510.0)

Trade receivables, net (2)

8,490.6

571.5

(166.4)

126.5

389.6

(105.5)

(2.6)

9,303.7

Other operating receivables

1,383.9

75.3

-

-

93.6

(15.5)

(29.2)

1,508.1

Impairment losses on other operating receivables

(121.7)

-

(14.1)

43.9

1.5

0.2

15.1

(75.1)

Other operating receivables, net (2)

1,262.2

75.3

(14.1)

43.9

95.1

(15.3)

(14.1)

1,433.0

Other receivables (3)

390.6

122.5

-

-

15.6

(9.8)

11.7

530.6

Tax receivables

825.3

346.6

-

-

14.3

(11.0)

16.9

1,192.1

Operating receivables, net

10,968.7

1,115.9

(180.5)

170.4

514.6

(141.6)

11.9

12,459.4

(1) Impairment losses are recorded in operating income

(2) Financial assets as defined by IAS 39, valued in accordance with the rules applicable to loans and receivables.

(3) Receivables recognized on a percentage completion basis in respect of construction activities and prepayments.




F-48



Back to Contents

Operating receivables


(€ million)

As of
December
31,2008

Changes
in
business

Impairment
losses(1)

Reversal of
impairment
losses

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign
exchange
translation

Reclassification
in assets /
liabilities
classified as held
for sale

Other

As of
December
31, 2009

Trade receivables

10,253.0

(378.2)

-

-

(199.6)

55.8

(56.9)

(32.5)

9,641.6

Impairment losses on trade receivables

(550.9)

-

(180.5)

112.2

11.3

(0.3)

9.5

38.4

(560.3)

Trade receivables, net(2)

9,702.1

(378.2)

(180.5)

112.2

(188.3)

55.5

(47.4)

5.9

9,081.3

Other operating receivables

1,314.1

(63.3)

-

-

(12.0)

24.6

(15.2)

(70.2)

1,178.0

Impairment losses on other operating receivables

(59.6)

-

(27.7)

13.7

0.0

(0.2)

-

(3.0)

(76.8)

Other operating receivables, net(2)

1,254.5

(63.3)

(27.7)

13.7

(12.0)

24.4

(15.2)

(73.2)

1,101.2

Other
receivables(3)

663.4

89.0

-

-

(1.7)

8.1

(28.4)

0.9

731.3

Tax receivables

1,473.2

(55.2)

-

-

(17.8)

7.5

(16.6)

(57.4)

1,333.7

Operating receivables, net

13,093.2

(407.7)

(208.2)

125.9

(219.8)

95.5

(107.6)

(123.8)

12,247.5


(1)

Impairment losses are recorded in operating income and included in the line “Changes in working capital” in the Consolidated Cash Flow Statement.

(2)

Financial assets as defined by IAS 39, valued in accordance with the rules applicable to loans and receivables.

(3)

Receivables recognized on a percentage completion basis in respect of construction activities and prepayments.


Operating receivables are treated as loans and receivables for accounting purposes. Short-term commercial receivables and payables without a declared interest rate are recognized at nominal value, unless discounting at the market rate has a material impact.

Changes in consolidation scope primarily concerned the following acquisitions:acquisitions and disposals:

Water:change in consolidation method (from full to proportionate consolidation) of the Water Division in North Africa and the Middle East following a change in governance for -€111.6 million and change in consolidation method (from proportionate to full consolidation) of Italian concessions for €47.6 million.

Environmental Services: Sulo Group (Germany)sale of the VPNM sub-group for €206 million and VSA Tecnitalia, formerly TMT (Italy) for €127 million;-€84.4 million.

Energy Services:Transportation: Thermal North America Inc. (United States)sale of Freight activities for €43 million;

Water: Thames Water subsidiaries (United Kingdom) for €35-€59 million.

Foreign exchange translation gains and losses losses are primarily due to the depreciationappreciation of the Australian dollar, Brazilian real and pound sterling and the U.S. dollar against the euro.

Securitization of receivables in France

The French securitization program is governed by an agreement signed in June 2002 for five years with a securitized debt fund. This agreement was renewed on May 31, 2007 for an additional 5 years. Veolia Environnement decided to renew this agreement and include 16 new transferor companies in the Water Division (France), bringing the number of transferor companies to 24 andSecuritized debts total securitized receivables to €495.5 million.

Disposal of receivables

Disposal of receivables (“cession de créances Dailly”) were nil€499.7 million as of December 31, 20072009 compared to €496.6 million at the end of December 2008.

These receivables are retained in assets and 2006.the financing secured is recorded in “Current borrowings” (see Note 17, Current borrowings).

Assignment of receivables

Receivables definitively soldassigned to third parties in the Energy Services Division in Italy totaled €178 million as of December 31, 2009, compared to €69.4 million as of December 31, 2008 and €25.5 million as of December 31, 2007, compared2007.



F-54



Back to €108 million as of December 31, 2006.Contents


Movements in operating payables during 2007:2009 are as follows:


Operating payables

(€ million)

As of December 31, 2006

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2007

Trade payables (1)

4,776.0

445.0

312.0

(56.1)

(133.1)

5,343.8

Other operating payables (2)

4,445.6

281.2

211.4

(55,4)

126.6

5,009.4

Other liabilities

988.3

133.4

18.0

(20,6)

65.2

1,184.3

Tax and employee-related liabilities

1,058.7

276.2

27.3

(19.0)

64.1

1,407.3

Operating payables

11,268.6

1,135.8

568.7

(151.1)

122.8

12,944.8

(1) Financial liabilities as defined by IAS 39, valued at amortized cost.

(2) Deferred income

Operating payables

 (€ million)

As of
December 31,
2008

Changes in
business

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign
exchange
translation

Reclassification
in assets /
liabilities
classified as held
for sale

Other

As of December
31, 2009

Trade payables(1)

5,634.5

(273.7)

(50.4)

35.3

(30.4)

(4.3)

5,311.0

Other current operating payables(1)

5,112.2

1.9

(129.7)

47.3

(63.6)

(34.7)

4,933.4

Other liabilities(2)

1,255.6

90.8

(1.2)

6.8

(6.0)

(21.6)

1,324.4

Tax and employee-related liabilities

1,589.5

81.3

(46.6)

15.9

(74.7)

(58.5)

1,506.9

Operating payables

13,591.8

(99.7)

(227.9)

105.3

(174.7)

(119.1)

13,075.7


(1)

Financial liabilities as defined by IAS 39, measured at amortized cost.

(2)

Primarily deferred income.


Trade payables are treated as liabilities at amortized cost in accordance with IAS 39 for accounting purposes. Short-term commercial payables without a declared interest rate are recognized at nominal value, unless discounting at the market rate has a material impact.

Changes in consolidation scope primarily concerned the following acquisitions:acquisitions and disposals:

Water:change in consolidation method (from full consolidation to proportionate consolidation) of the Water Division in North Africa and the Middle East following a change in governance for -€123.4 million;

Environmental Services: Sulo Group (Germany)sale of the VPNM sub-group for €176 million and VSA Tecnitalia, formerly TMT (Italy) for €107 million;-€99.1 million.

Energy Services:Transportation: Thermal North America Inc. (United States)sale of Freight activities for €45 million;

- €54.3 million.

Water:Foreign exchange translation gains and losses Thames Water subsidiaries (United Kingdom)are primarily due to the appreciation of the Australian dollar, Brazilian real and pound sterling against the euro.

Recap: Movements in net working capital during 2008 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December
31,2007

Changes in
business

Impairment
losses

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign
exchange
translation

Other

As of
December
31, 2008

Inventories and work-in-progress, net

839.4

172.1

(43.2)

75.4

(20.6)

(1.1)

1,022.0

Operating receivables, net

12,459.4

857.4

(24.6)

(33.7)

(183.2)

17.9

13,093.2

Operating payables, net

12,944.8

983.2

-

(36.6)

(231.3)

(68.3)

13,591.8

Net working capital

354.0

46.3

(67.8)

78.3

27.5

85.1

523.4


NOTE 14

Cash and cash equivalents and bank overdrafts and other cash position items

Movements in cash and cash equivalents and bank overdrafts and other cash position items during 2009 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December
31,2008

Changes in
business

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Fair value
adjustments(1)

Foreign
exchange
translation

Other

As of
December
31, 2009

Cash

1,317.9

44.1

(57.3)

-

24.3

(18.6)

1,310.4

Cash equivalents

2,531.7

1,797.1

(20.7)

1.3

(0.4)

(5.0)

4,304.0

Cash & cash equivalents

3,849.6

1,841.2

(78.0)

1.3

23.9

(23.6)

5,614.4

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

465.7

(3.4)

(6.4)

 

(1.4)

0.4

454.9

Net cash

3,383.9

1,844.6

(71.6)

1.3

25.3

(24.0)

5,159.5


(1)

Fair value adjustments are recorded in financial income and expenses.


Cash and cash equivalents of -€23.7 million were transferred to “Assets classified as held for €64 million.


sale” in 2009.



F-49F-55



Back to Contents


Foreign exchange translation losses are primarily due to the depreciation of the pound sterling and the U.S. dollar against the euro.

Other movements primarily concern the reclassification of other long-term debts in working capital (primarily subscriber deposits and work funds, tax liabilities and liabilities on the acquisition of financial assets) of €152.3 million.


Recap: Movements in net working capital during 2006:

(€ million)

As of

December 31, 2005

Changes in business

Impairment losses

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of

December 31, 2006

Inventories and work-in-progress, net

635.2

77.2

(2.4)

36.8

(5.3)

(9.7)

731.8

Operating receivables, net

10,083.3

508.7

(33.3)

495.5

(55.8)

(29.7)

10,968.7

Operating payables, net

10,369.8

460.0

0.0

536.5

(54.1)

(43.6)

11,268.6

Net working capital

348.7

125.9

(35.7)

(4.2)

(7.0)

4.2

431.9


NOTE 14.

Other current financial assets

Movements in the value of other current financial assets during 2007:

(€ million)

As of

December 31, 2006

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Fair value adjustments (1)

Impairment losses (1)

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of

December 31, 2007

Gross

363.3

27.6

4.6

-

-

(1.5)

(219.9)

174.1

Impairment losses

(158.0)

-

(1.0)

-

(3.3)

0.1

140.9

(21.3)

Current financial assets in loans and receivables, net

205.3

27.6

3.6

-

(3.3)

(1.4)

(79.0)

152.8

Other current financial assets

66.4

90.9

37.6

(1.3)

0.1

(6.7)

(9.8)

177.2

Total Other current financial assets, net

271.7

118.5

41.2

(1.3)

(3.2)

(8.1)

(88.8)

330.0

(1)

Impairment losses are recorded in financial income and expenses.


Other short-term loans are treated as loans and receivables as defined by IAS 39 for accounting purposes.

Other financial assets are treated as available-for-sale assets for accounting purposes.

Other current financial assets as of December 31, 2007 primarily comprise the non-Group portion of loans and current accounts, the pre-financing of assets in the Transportation Division and the current part of an investment under escrow account with a view to the acquisition of Tianjin Shibei shares in China for €106.1 million.

Other movements primarily comprise the removal of loans and current accounts granted to proportionately consolidated companies (mainly in respect of the Berlin contract).



F-50



Back to Contents


Recap: Movements in the value of other current financial assets during 2006:


(€ million)

As of

December 31, 2005

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Fair value adjustments (1)

Impairment losses (1)

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of

December 31,2006

Gross

379.5

(2.6)

5.4

-

-

(3.7)

(15.3)

363.3

Impairment losses

(158.3)

-

-

-

(1.2)

-

1.5

(158.0)

Current financial assets in loans and receivables, net

221.2

(2.6)

5.4

-

(1.2)

(3.7)

(13.8)

205.3

Current financial assets available for sale, net

60.7

(2.5)

1.4

1.5

-

(0.3)

5.6

66.4

Other current financial assets, net

281.9

(5.1)

6.8

1.5

(1.2)

(4.0)

(8.2)

271.7

(1)

Impairment losses are recorded in financial income and expenses.


Net other short-term loans as of December 31, 2006 primarily comprise the non-group portion of loans and current accounts granted to proportionately consolidated companies (mainly in respect of the Berlin contract for €69.8 million and in France in the Water Division for €66.4 million) and the pre-financing of assets in the Transportation Division for €17.7 million.


NOTE 15.

Cash & Cash equivalents

Movements in cash and cash equivalents during 2007:


(€ million)

As of

December 31, 2006

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Fair value adjustments   (1)

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2007

Cash

1,263.8

97.3

114.9

-

(8.1)

(18.4)

1,449.5

Cash equivalents

1,394.2

333.8

20.4

(0.1)

(2.4)

(79.8)

1,666.1

Cash & cash equivalents

2,658.0

431.1

135.3

(0.1)

(10.5)

(98.2)

3,115.6

(1)

Fair value adjustments are recorded in financial income and expenses.

Cash and cash equivalents of €0.3 million were transferred to Assets classified as held for sale in 2007, compared to €0.5 million in 2006.

Changes in consolidation scope mainly concernprimarily concerned the acquisitionfollowing disposals:

Transportation:sale of Sulo byFreight activities for - €32.2 million.

Environmental Services: sale of the Environmental Services DivisionVPNM sub-group for -€38.6 million.

Water: change in Germany (+€26.1 million)the consolidation method (from full to proportionate consolidation) in North Africa and the acquisition of the Thames Water subsidiaries (+€21.4 million) and subsidiaries in Asia (+€45.3 million) by the Water Division.



F-51



Back to Contents


Middle East for -€10.2 million.

As of December 31, 2007,2009, the Water Division held cash of €482.6€477.5 million, the Environmental Services Division held cash of €182.9 million, the Energy Services Division held cash of €294.8 million, the Environmental Services Division held cash of €247.8€280.4 million, the Transportation Division held cash of €129.7€158.6 million, Veolia Environnement SA held cash of €134.8€41.4 million and certain subsidiaries (primarily insurance) held cash of €159.8€169.6 million.

Investment supports used by the Group include UCITS (Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities), negotiable debt instruments (bank certificates of deposit and treasury notes with a maturity of less than three months) and monetary notes.

Surplus cash balances of other Group subsidiaries, not pooled at Veolia Environnement SA level, are invested in accordance with procedures defined by the Group. Note 29.3.2 – Management of liquidity risk, presents a breakdown of investments by nature.

As of December 31, 2007,2009, cash equivalents were primarily held by Veolia Environnement SA in the amount of €1,416.1€4,049.8 million (including cash mutual fund investmentsincluding monetary UCITS of €515.8€3,037.9 million, negotiable debt instruments (bank certificates of deposit and treasury notes with a maturity of €601.1less than three months) of €375.2 million, monetary notes of €385.0 million and cash notes for €278.8 million).term deposit accounts of €250.0 million. Cash equivalents are accounted for as assets designated at fair value through profitthe Consolidated Income Statement.

Bank overdrafts and loss.


other cash position items consist of credit balances on bank accounts and related accrued interest payable, corresponding to brief overdrafts.

Recap: Movementsmovements in cash and cash equivalents during 2006:2008 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December
31,2007

Changes in
business

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Fair value
adjustments (1)

Foreign
exchange
translation

Other

As of
December
31, 2008

Cash

1,449.5

(119.0)

16.2

-

(24.7)

(4.1)

1,317.9

Cash equivalents

1,666.1

845.1

13.0

-

(2.9)

10.4

2,531.7

Cash & cash equivalents

3,115.6

726.1

29.2

-

(27.6)

6.3

3,849.6

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

459.4

32.7

18.1

 

(6.0)

(38.5)

465.7

Net cash

2,656.2

693.4

11.1

 

(21.6)

44.8

3,383.9


(1)

Fair value adjustments are recorded in financial income and expenses.


(€ million)

As of

December 31, 2005

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Fair value adjustments     (1)

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of

December 31, 2006

Cash

1,173.1

(81.3)

196.5

-

(23.0)

(1.5)

1,263.8

Cash equivalents

1,163.0

222.2

5.0

0.4

0.4

3.2

1,394.2

Cash & cash equivalents

2,336.1

140.9

201.5

0.4

(22 .6)

1.7

2,658.0

(1)

Fair value adjustments are recorded in financial income and expenses.

Cash and cash equivalents of €0.5€1.8 million were transferred to Assets“Assets classified as held for salesale” in 2006.

Changes in consolidation scope mainly concern the acquisition of SNCM for €100.72008, compared to €0.3 million in the Transportation Division, acquisitions in the Water Division for €40.8 million (in Germany and China) and acquisitions in the Environmental Services Division for €38.5 million (Belgium and the United Kingdom).2007.

As of December 31, 2006,2008, the Water Division held cash of €517.4€492.0 million, the Environmental Services Division held cash of €204.2 million, the Energy Services Division held cash of €219.1 million, the Environmental Services Division held cash of €214.4€268.5 million, the Transportation Division held cash of €141.8€176.2 million, Veolia Environnement SA held cash of €43.8€3.3 million and other head office entitiescertain subsidiaries (primarily insurance) held cash of €117.0€173.7 million.

As of December 31, 2006,2008, cash equivalents were primarily held by Veolia Environnement SA in the amount of €1,096.8€2,280.2 million (including cash mutual fund investmentsincluding non-dynamic monetary UCITS of €823.0€586.0 million, negotiable debt instruments (bank certificates of deposit and treasury notes with a maturity of €208.3 million).less than three months) of €955.8 million and monetary notes of €729.2 million. Cash equivalents are accounted for as assets designated at fair value through profitthe Consolidated Income Statement.

Bank overdrafts and loss.other cash position items consist of credit balances on bank accounts and related accrued interest payable, corresponding to brief overdrafts. The contributors in 2008 are the Water Division (€210.7 million), the Environmental Services Division (€99.1 million), the Energy Services Division (€77.9 million), the Transportation Division (€43.4 million) and other (€34.6 million).



F-52



Back to Contents


NOTE 16.

Equity


(€ million)

Number of shares outstanding

Share capital

Additional paid-in capital

Treasury shares

Consolidated reserves and retained earnings

Foreign exchange translation reserves

Fair value reserves

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

Minority interests

Total equity

As of January 1, 2005

406,421,983

2,032.1

6,467.6

(459.3)

(4,677.5)

(72.1)

(79.6)

3,211.2

1,728.7

4,939.9

Issues of share capital of the parent company

1,450,623

7.3

31.5

-

8.6

-

-

47.4

-

47.4

Elimination of treasury shares

 

-

-

6.6

2.6

-

-

9.2

-

9.2

Share purchase and subscription options

 

-

-

-

16.2

-

-

16.2

-

16.2

Third party share in share capital increases by subsidiaries and changes in consolidation scope

 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

80.0

80.0

Parent company dividend distribution

 

-

-

-

(265.4)

-

-

(265.4)

-

(265.4)

Third party share in dividend distributions by subsidiaries

 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(108.6)

(108.6)

Foreign exchange translation

 

-

-

-

-

284.4

-

284.4

33.6

318.0

Fair value adjustments

 

-

-

-

-

-

9.7

9.7

1.6

11.3

Actuarial gains or losses on pension obligations

 

-

-

-

(132.5)

-

-

(132.5)

(12.2)

(144.7)

Net income for the year

 

-

-

-

622.2

-

-

622.2

172.9

795.1

Other changes

 

-

-

-

(26.3)

-

14.1

(12.2)

(8.0)

(20.2)




F-53F-56



Back to Contents



(€ million)

Number of shares outstanding

Share capital

Additional paid-in capital

Treasury shares

Consolidated reserves and retained earnings

Foreign exchange translation reserves

Fair value reserves

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

Minority interests

Total equity

As of December 31, 2005

407,872,606

2,039.4

6,499.1

(452.7)

(4,452.1)

212.3

(55.8)

3,790.2

1,888.0

5,678.2

Issues of share capital of the parent company

4,753,944

23.7

142.1

-

15.8

-

-

181.6

-

181.6

Elimination of treasury shares

 

-

-

(26.9)

25.8

-

-

(1.1)

-

(1.1)

Share purchase and subscription options

 

-

-

-

16.7

-

-

16.7

-

16.7

Third party share in share capital increases by subsidiaries and changes in consolidation scope

 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

158.8

158.8

Parent company dividend distribution

 

-

-

-

(336.3)

-

-

(336.3)

-

(336.3)

Third party share in dividend distributions by subsidiaries

 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(142.9)

(142.9)

Foreign exchange translation

 

-

-

-

-

(106.8)

0.5

(106.3)

6.2

(100.1)

Fair value adjustments

 

-

-

-

0.2

-

33.2

33.4

1.3

34.7

Actuarial gains or losses on pension obligations

 

-

-

-

26.4

-

-

26.4

(0.8)

25.6

Net income for the year

 

-

-

-

758.7

-

-

758.7

236.2

994.9

Other changes

 

-

-

-

(41.9)

39.1

0.3

(2.5)

45.8

43.3


NOTE 15



F-54



Back to Contents



(€ million)

Number of shares outstanding

Share capital

Additional paid-in capital

Treasury shares

Consolidated reserves and retained earnings

Foreign exchange translation reserves

Fair value reserves

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

Minority interests

Total equity

As of December 31, 2006

412,626,550

2,063.1

6,641.2

(479.6)

(3 986.7)

144.6

(21.8)

4,360.8

2,192.6

6,553.4

           

Issues of share capital of the parent company

59,136,206

295.7

2,538.3

-

33.8

-

-

2 867.8

-

2,867.8

Elimination of treasury shares

 

-

-

18.9

(0.3)

-

-

18.6

-

18.6

Share purchase and subscription options

 

-

-

-

15.6

-

-

15.6

-

15.6

Third party share in share capital increases by subsidiaries and changes in consolidation scope

 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

178.5

178.5

Parent company dividend distribution

 

-

-

-

(419.7)

-

-

(419.7)

-

(419.7)

Third party share in dividend distributions by subsidiaries

 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(144.6)

(144.6)

Foreign exchange translation

 

-

-

-

-

(264.3)

-

(264.3)

15.4

(248.9)

Fair value adjustments

 

-

-

-

-

(8.1)

47.1

39.0

(0.8)

38.2

Actuarial gains or losses on pension obligations

 

-

-

-

79.5

-

-

79.5

8.5

88.0

Net income for the year

 

-

-

-

927.9

-

-

927.9

326.9

1,254.8

Other changes

 

-

-

-

(17.3)

8.7

(3.7)

(12.3)

1.3

(11.0)

As of December 31, 2007

471,762,756

2,358.8

9,179.5

(460.7)

(3 367.2)

(119.1)

21.6

7,612.9

2,577.8

10,190.7


The dividend distribution per share was €1.05, €0.85 and €0.68 in 2007, 2006 and 2005 respectively.


A dividend distribution of €1.21 per share is proposed to the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting of May 7, 2008.


Equity



F-55



Back to Contents


16.115.1

Share capital management objectives, policies and procedures

Veolia Environnement manages its share capital within the framework of a prudent and rigorous financial policy that seeks to ensure easy access to French and international capital markets, to enable investment in projects that create value and provide shareholders with a satisfactory remuneration.remuneration, while maintaining a credit rating in excess of BBB.

This policy has led Veolia Environnement to define the following objectives:

(i)a debt coverage ratio: Net financial indebtednessdebt / (EBITDA+ repayment of(Operating cash flow before changes in working capital + principal payments on operating financial assets) of between 3.5 and 44.

(ii) Dividend distribution rate of greater than 50% of recurring net income.Net debt represents gross borrowings (non-current borrowings, current borrowings, bank overdrafts and other cash position items), less cash and cash equivalents and excluding fair value adjustments to derivatives hedging debt.

16.215.2

EquityTotal equity attributable to equity holdersowners of the parentCompany

16.2.115.2.1

Share capital

The share capital is fully paid up.

Share capital increases

In 2005, Veolia Environnement carried out a share capital increase of €34.6 million, subscribed by members of the Group employee savings plan in France and abroad. The discount on the issue price was expensed in the amount of €8.6 million.

In addition, the share capital was increased by €4.2 million (including additional paid-in capital) following the exercise of share purchase and subscription options.

In 2006, the share capital was increased by €92.9 million (including additional paid-in capital) following the exercise of share purchase and subscription options and by €70.7 million (including additional paid-in capital) following a share capital increase reserved for employees (Group employee savings plan). The discount on the issue price was expensed in the amount of €15.8 million.

In addition, the share capital was increased by €2.2 million (including additional paid-in capital) following the exercise of share subscription warrants.

On July 10, 2007, Veolia Environnement performed a share capital increase for cash with retention of preferential subscription rights in the amount of €2,558.1 million (after offset of share capital increase costs of €23.3 million against additional paid-in capital).

In addition in 2007, Veolia Environnement performed a share capital increase of €156.2 million, subscribed by members of the Group employee savings plan in France and abroad. The discount on the issue price was expensed in the amount of €33.8 million.

Furthermore, the share capital was increased by €119.7 million (including additional paid-in capital) following the exercise of share purchase and subscription options.

In 2008, Veolia Environnement performed a share capital increase of €22 million following the exercise of share purchase and subscription options.

In 2009, Veolia Environnement performed a share capital increase of €322 million on the payment of scrip dividends. As decided by the Annual General Meeting of Shareholders of May 7, 2009, the Group offered shareholders a choice of payment of the dividend in cash or shares. Shareholders elected for the payment of 58% of dividends in shares, leading to the creation of 20,111,683 shares, representing just over 4.25% of the share capital and 4.39% of voting rights.

In addition in 2009, Veolia performed a share capital increase (including additional-paid-in capital) reserved for employees (Group employee savings plan) of €19.4 million (excluding issuance costs). A discount was not granted on the subscription price.

Finally, Veolia Environnement performed a share capital increase of €0.7 million following the exercise of share options.

Number of shares outstanding and par value:

406,421,983The number of shares were outstanding as of January 1, 2005, 407,872,606 as of December 31, 2005, 412,626,550 as of December 31, 2006 andis 471,762,756 shares as of December 31, 2007, 472,576,666 shares as of December 31, 2008 and 493,630,374 shares as of December 31, 2009 (including treasury shares). The par value of each share is €5.

16.2.2

F-57



Back to Contents


15.2.2

Offset of treasury shares against equity

In 2005, 193,306 shares with a2007, the net carrying amount of €9.2 million were sold as part of transactions reserved for employees. As of December 31, 2005, the Group held 15,990,242 of its own shares.

In 2006, 3,424,934 shares were sold and a call sold covering 2,700,000decrease in treasury shares was repurchased-133,654 shares, for a net carrying amount of €105.8 million as part of transactions reserved for employees. At the same time, Veolia Environnement purchased 2,689,000 treasury shares for a total consideration of €106.9 million and sold a call covering 1,400,000 shares. As of December 31, 2006, the Group held 15,254,308 of its own shares.

In 2007, 133,654 shares with a net carrying amount of €3.2 million were sold.million. As of December 31, 2007, the Group held 15,120,654 of its own shares.

In 2008, the net decrease in treasury shares was -140,620 shares, for a net carrying amount of €3.2 million. As of December 31, 2008, the Group held 14,980,034 of its own shares.

In 2009, Veolia Environnement transferred 109,533 shares as consideration for an external growth transaction performed by a subsidiary for an amount of €1.9 million and 138,909 shares as part of the share capital increase reserved for employees; as of December 31, 2009, the Group held 14,731,592 of its own shares.



15.2.3

F-56



Back to Contents


16.2.3

Share purchase and subscription options

In accordance with IFRS 2, an expense of €16.2 million in 2005, €16.7 million in 2006 and €15.6 million in 2007, €5.5 million in 2008 million and €10.9 million in 2009 was recognized in respect of share option plans granted to employees.

16.2.415.2.4

Appropriation of net income and dividend distribution

A dividend distribution of €419.7€553.8 million was paid in 2006 out of 2006distributed by Veolia Environnement SA. 2008 net income attributable to equity holdersowners of the parentCompany of €758.7 million. The residual balance of €339.0€405.1 million was transferredappropriated in full to Veolia Environnement consolidated reserves.the distribution of dividends.

16.2.515.2.5

Foreign exchange translation reserves

As of January 1, 2005, foreign exchange translation adjustments attributable to equity holders of the parent (-€72.1 million) included €11.2 million relating to the reversal of foreign exchange translation adjustments, net of tax, on discontinued operations of the Water Division in the United States. Other movements totaled -€83.3 million and mainly concerned the U.S. dollar (-€75.6 million).

In 2005, positive translation differences of €284.4 million (portion attributable to equity holders of the parent) concerned the U.S. dollar in the amount of €113.5 million.

Accumulated foreign exchange translation reserves as of December 31, 2005January 1, 2007 are positive: €212.3 million (portion attributable to equity holders of the parent), including €49.1 million related to the U.S. dollar and €41.7 million related to the Korean won.

In 2006, negative translation differences of €106.3 million (portion attributable to equity holders of the parent) concerned the U.S. dollarpositive in the amount of €95.0 million.

Accumulated foreign exchange translation reserves as of December 31, 2006 are positive: €144.6 million (portion attributable to equity holdersowners of the parent)Company), including €32.6 million related to the Korean won, €60.4 million related to the pound sterling, €68.8 million related to the Czech crown and -€45.9 million related to the U.S. dollar.

In 2007, negative translation differenceslosses of €263.7-€263.7 million (portion attributable to equity holdersowners of the parent)Company) concerned the U.S. dollar in the amount of €80.3-€80.3 million, the pound sterling in the amount of €122.2-€122.2 million and the Chinese renminbi yuan in the amount of €41.9-€41.9 million.

Accumulated foreign exchange translation reserves as of December 31, 2007 are negative:negative in the amount of -€119.1 million (portion attributable to equity holdersowners of the parent)Company), including -€126.2 million related to the U.S. dollar, -€61.8 million related to the pound sterling, +€80.7€80.7 million related to the Czech crown and -€46.0 million related to the Chinese renminbi yuan.

In 2008, translation losses of -€313.8 million (portion attributable to owners of the Company) primarily concerned the pound sterling in the amount of -€324.1 million, the U.S. dollar in the amount of €74.4 million and the Chinese renminbi yuan in the amount of €156.1 million.

Accumulated foreign exchange translation reserves as of December 31, 2008 are negative in the amount of -€432.9 million (portion attributable to owners of the Company), including -€51.8 million related to the U.S. dollar, -€385.9 million related to the pound sterling, €74 million related to the Czech crown and €110.1 million related to the Chinese renminbi yuan.

In 2009, translation gains of €88.5 million (portion attributable to equity owners of the Company) concerned the U.S. dollar in the amount of -€57.5 million, the pound sterling in the amount of +€65.8 million, the Chinese renminbi yuan in the amount of -€85.0 million and the Australian dollar in the amount of +€60.0 million.

The marked dropincrease in foreign exchange translation reserves primarily reflects the ongoing appreciation of the europound sterling and Australian dollar against the currencies of the zoneseuro in which the Group operates (United States and China for2009, while the U.S. dollar and Chinese renminbi yuan anddepreciated against the United Kingdom for the pound sterling). This downturn has however been limitedeuro. Movements in foreign exchange translation reserves are nonetheless significantly reduced by the Group policy of securing borrowings in the local currency.





F-57F-58



Back to Contents


Movements in Foreignforeign exchange translation reserves (attributable to equity holdersowners of the parentCompany and minorityto non-controlling interests):


(€ million)

Total

Attributable to equity holders of the parent

Total

o/w attributable to owners of the Company

Translation differences on the financial statements of subsidiaries drawn up in a foreign currency

291.6

246.4

(26.1)

(84.8)

Translation differences on net foreign investments

(35.0)

(34.1)

(36.8)

(34.3)

As of December 31, 2005

256.6

212.3

As of December 31, 2007

(62.9)

(119.1)

Translation differences on the financial statements of subsidiaries drawn up in a foreign currency

237.8

186.5

(333.0)

(379.8)

Translation differences on net foreign investments

(42.8)

(41.9)

(52.8)

(53.1)

As of December 31, 2006

195.0

144.6

As of December 31, 2008

(385.8)

(432.9)

Translation differences on the financial statements of subsidiaries drawn up in a foreign currency

(263.9)

(271.3)

73.2

82.5

Translation differences on net foreign investments

6.0

7.6

6.2

6.0

Movements in 2007

(257.9)

(263.7)

Movements in 2009

79.4

88.5

Translation differences on the financial statements of subsidiaries drawn up in a foreign currency

(26.1)

(84.8)

(259.8)

(297.2)

Translation differences on net foreign investments

(36.8)

(34.3)

(46.6)

(47.2)

As of December 31, 2007

(62.9)

(119.1)

As of December 31, 2009

(306.4)

(344.4)


Breakdown by currency of Foreign exchange translation reserves attributable to equity holdersowners of the parent:Company:

(€ million)

As of
December 31,2007

As of
December 31, 2008

Movement

As of
December 31, 2009

Pound sterling

(61.8)

(385.9)

65.8

(320.1)

Chinese renminbi yuan

(46.0)

110.1

(85.0)

25.1

Czech crown

80.7

74.0

7.6

81.6

U.S. dollar

(126.2)

(51.8)

(57.5)

(109.3)

Australian dollar

(0.7)

(45.5)

60.0

14.5

Korean won

8.8

(32.3)

4.9

(27.4)

Polish zloty

11.3

(24.7)

16.0

(8.7)

Hong Kong dollar

16.3

(24.5)

18.8

(5.7)

Norwegian crown

2.4

(17.9)

16.1

(1.8)

Romanian leu

4.9

(7.1)

(5.3)

(12.4)

Canadian dollar

7.7

(4.8)

9.4

4.6

Swedish krona

(5.6)

(3.9)

16.7

12.8

Hungarian florint

2.7

(3.4)

(1.4)

(4.8)

Mexican peso

2.0

(1.1)

(6.7)

(7.8)

Egyptian pound

(0.6)

(0.8)

0.2

(0.6)

Other currencies

(15.0)

(13.3)

28.9

15.6

Total

(119.1)

(432.9)

88.5

(344.4)



(€ million)

 

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2006

Movement

As of December 31, 2007

U.S. dollar

49.1

(45.9)

(80.3)

(126.2)

Czech crown

18.3

68.8

11.9

80.7

Pound sterling

33.1

60.4

(122.2)

(61.8)

Chinese yuan

28.3

(4.1)

(41.9)

(46.0)

Hong Kong dollar

1.8

8.2

8.1

16.3

Polish zloty

4.7

5.2

6.1

11.3

Korean won

41.7

32.6

(23.8)

8.8

Canadian dollar

10.0

1.9

5.8

7.7

Swedish krona

(5.0)

1.5

(7.1)

(5.6)

Romanian leu

4.9

13.9

(9.0)

4.9

Hungarian florint

2.1

3.4

(0.7)

2.7

Norwegian crown

2.0

(0.6)

3.0

2.4

Mexican peso

2.7

1.6

0.4

2.0

Australian dollar

6.9

1.0

(1.7)

(0.7)

Egyptian pound

3.7

0.4

(1.0)

(0.6)

Other currencies

8.0

(3.7)

(11.3)

(15.0)

Total

212.3

144.6

(263.7)

(119.1)




F-58F-59



Back to Contents


16.2.615.2.6

Fair value reserves

Fair value reserves attributable to equity holdersowners of the parentCompany are negative in the amount of €79.6 million as of January 1, 2005, €55.8 million as of December 31, 2005 and €21.8 million as of December 31, 2006 and positive in the amount of €21.6 million as of December 31, 2007.

As2007, -€79.2 million as of December 31, 2007, fair value reserves mainly include fair value adjustments to interest-rate derivatives hedging floating-rate borrowings (-€14.3 million)2008 and fair value adjustments to available-for-sale securities (€34.4 million).-€43.5 million as of December 31, 2009.

(€ million)

Available-for sale securities

Commodity derivatives hedging cash flows

Foreign currency derivatives hedging cash flows

Interest rate derivatives hedging cash flows

Total

o/w Attributable to owners of the Company

As of December 31, 2007

34.4

1.0

0.8

(16.1)

20.1

21.6

Fair value adjustments

(18.5)

(32.9)

(0.6)

(60.1)

(112.1)

(101.6)

Other movements

0.1

4.1

-

0.9

5.1

0.8

As of December 31, 2008

16.0

(27.8)

0.2

(75.3)

(86.9)

(79.2)

Fair value adjustments

(4.0)

22.3

3.4

17.7

39.4

38.6

Other movements

 

(4.0)

0.5

0.3

(3.2)

(2.9)

As of December 31, 2009

12.0

(9.5)

4.1

(57.3)

(50.7)

(43.5)


(€ million)

 

Available- for-sale securities

Interest rate derivatives hedging cash flows

Total

Attributable to equity holders of the parent

As of December 31, 2005

3.0

(60.7)

(57.7)

(55.8)

Fair value adjustments

(2.3)

37.0

34.7

33.4

Other movements

-

0.6

0.6

0.6

As of December 31, 2006

0.7

(23.1)

(22.4)

(21.8)

Fair value adjustments

32 .5

13.9

46.4

47.1

Other movements

1.2

(5.1)

(3.9)

(3.7)

As of December 31, 2007

34.4

(14.3)

20.1

21.6

Amounts are presented net of tax.


Amounts are presented net of tax

No material amounts were released to the Consolidated Income Statement in respect of interest rate derivatives hedging cash flows and recorded in finance costs and incomeincome.

16.315.3

MinorityNon-controlling interests

A break downbreakdown of the movement in minoritynon-controlling interests is presented in the Statement of changesChanges in shareholders' equity.


Equity.

The increase in minoritynon-controlling interests in 2007 was2009 is due to the dividend distribution for -€202.0 million, offset by the net income for the year of €257.8 million and the various share capital increases for €149.8 million.

The decrease in non-controlling interests in 2008 is mainly due to the consolidation of Chinese companiesshare capital reduction performed by the company carrying the Berlin contract in the Water Division (+€86.4 million)for -€131.2 million and the acquisitiondistribution of minority interestsdividends for -€200.8 million, partially offset by the ERBD in Central and Eastern Europe innet income for the Water Division (+€90 million).year of €304.1 million.



F-59



Back to Contents


NOTE 17.16

Non-current provisions and other debt and current provisions

Pursuant to IAS 37 (see Note 1.13)1.14), provisions maturing after more than one year are discounted. Discount rates used were as follows:


Discount rates


As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31,2008

As of
December 31,2007

Euro

     

2 to 5 years

5.27%

4.37%

3.25%

2.49%

5.67%

5.27%

6 to 10 years

5.52%

4.60%

3.88%

4.14%

5.97%

5.52%

After ten years

6.04%

5.20%

4.32%

More than ten years

5.59%

6.65%

6.04%

U.S. Dollar

     

2 to 5 years

4.35%

5.20%

5.16%

2.24%

4.95%

4.35%

6 to 10 years

4.94%

5.36%

5.55%

4.67%

5.75%

4.94%

After ten years

5.84%

5.86%

5.79%

More than ten years

5.92%

6.82%

5.84%

Pound Sterling

     

2 to 5 years

5.51%

5.60%

4.88%

2.26%

6.13%

5.51%

6 to 10 years

5.66%

5.56%

5.11%

4.43%

6.40%

5.66%

After ten years

5.88%

5.60%

5.10%

More than ten years

5.68%

6.46%

5.88%


The discount rate calculation methodology is presented in Note 2, Use of management estimates in the application of Group accounting standards.




F-60



Back to Contents


Movements innon-current provisions and other debt during 2007:2009 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December
31,2008

Addition /
charge

Repayment /
Utilization
during the
year

Reversal

Actuarial
gains
(losses)

Unwinding
of discount

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign
exchange
translation

Non-current /
current
reclassification

Other

As of
December
31, 2009

Tax litigations

126.0

45.7

(27.9)

(3.2)

-

(0.1)

-

-

(28.9)

11.7

123.3

Employee litigations

9.3

2.7

(0.3)

(0.5)

-

0.1

(0.2)

-

(0.8)

0.4

10.7

Other litigations

76.2

31.0

(4.7)

(4.4)

-

2.0

-

(0.2)

(10.4)

8.4

97.9

Contractual commitments

248.6

186.1

(173.3)

(1.3)

-

1.4

-

-

-

6.2

267.7

Provisions for work-in-progress & losses to completion on LT contracts

226.6

33.9

(10.0)

(1.7)

-

10.6

0.8

0.9

(41.0)

(4.9)

215.2

Closure and post-closure costs

520.4

19.6

(5.9)

(10.5)

-

111.1

9.8

3.5

(37.1)

(3.0)

607.9

Restructuring provisions

1.2

0.2

(0.1)

(0.3)

-

-

-

-

(0.2)

-

0.8

Self-insurance provisions

126.7

59.4

(53.8)

(0.6)

-

2.9

-

(0.3)

(21.2)

(0.4)

112.7

Other

97.0

16.6

(22.1)

(3.9)

-

1.5

(1.2)

-

(12.7)

1.7

76.9

Non-current provisions excl. pensions and other employee benefits

1,432.0

395.2

(298.1)

(26.4)

-

129.5

9.2

3.9

(152.3)

20.1

1 513.1

Provisions for pensions and other employee benefits

728.2

89.1

(101.3)

(31.0)

68.5

38.3

(7.9)

14.1

-

(20.0)

778.0

Non-current provisions

2,160.2

484.3

(399.4)

(57.4)

68.5

167.8

1.3

18.0

(152.3)

0.1

2,291.1


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2006

Addition / charge

Repayment / Utilization during the year

Reversal

Actuarial gains (losses)

Unwinding of discount

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Non-current / current reclassification

Other

As of

December 31, 2007

Tax litigations

65.3

34.2

(20.3)

(1.5)

-

0.7

5.8

(0.1)

(1.9)

13.5

95.7

Employee litigations

3.2

3.8

(4.4)

(0.1)

-

-

0.1

-

-

7.7

10.3

Other litigations

94.5

19.5

(17.2)

(10.9)

-

2.0

0.5

(1.2)

(9.5)

1.0

78.7

Contractual commitments

287.8

164.6

(184.5)

(3.7)

-

-

0.8

-

-

3.1

268.1

Provisions for work-in-progress & losses to completion on LT contracts

312.6

36.4

(19.9)

(2.3)

-

14.7

(11.0)

(1.2)

(51.9)

(1.0)

276.4

Closure and post-closure costs

398.3

8.5

(14.0)

(4.8)

-

40.4

84.2

(20.4)

(15.1)

62.5

539.6

Restructuring provisions

23.2

0.1

(0.2)

(0.2)

-

-

(17.0)

-

(5.7)

1.1

1.3

Self-insurance provisions

131.1

39.6

(36.8)

-

-

1.6

(0.5)

(3.6)

(5.0)

7.4

133.8

Other

131.6

37.8

(15.7)

(21.8)

-

2.1

2.6

(2.0)

(7.8)

(37.6)

89.2

Non-current provisions excl. pensions and other employee benefits

1,447.6

344.5

(313.0)

(45.3)

-

61.5

65.5

(28.5)

(96.9)

57.7

1,493.1

Provisions for pensions and other employee benefits*

749.0

66.6

(89.5)

(6.2)

(122.7)

18.2

22.1

(10.7)

-

19.1

645.8

Non-current provisions

2,196.6

411.1

(402.5)

(51.5)

(122.7)

79.7

87.6

(39.2)

(96.9)

76.8

2,138.9

Other non-current debt

207.3

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(207.3)(1)

-

-

Non-current provisions and other debt

2,403.9

411.1

(402.5)

(51.5)

(122.7)

79.7

87.6

(39.2)

(304.2)

76.8

2,138.9

(1) Other non-current liabilities were primarily reclassified in working capital.

* See Note 32.


Movements in current provisions during2009 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December
31,2008

Charge

Utilization

Reversal

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign
exchange
translation

Non-current /
current
reclassification

Other

As of
December
31, 2009

Tax litigations

63.2

18.2

(20.9)

(35.5)

(0.7)

0.1

28.9

(9.1)

44.2

Employee litigations

28.7

11.9

(8.6)

(3.4)

(5.3)

0.1

0.8

0.3

24.5

Other litigations

113.0

46.6

(26.1)

(19.6)

(0.3)

(0.5)

10.5

(6.8)

116.8

Provisions for work-in-progress & losses to completion on LT contracts

158.8

85.2

(94.8)

(10.1)

1.3

2.7

41.0

(35.7)

148.4

Closure and post-closure costs

68.7

12.1

(37.8)

(1.7)

(2.8)

1.5

37.1

1.3

78.4

Restructuring provisions

26.6

5.3

(18.6)

(3.3)

(0.1)

0.2

0.2

(1.4)

8.9

Self-insurance provisions

106.0

84.1

(70.4)

(2.7)

0.6

(1.0)

21.2

(2.7)

135.1

Other

208.1

122.5

(102.4)

(33.2)

(5.6)

1.7

12.6

(10.8)

192.9

Current provisions

773.1

385.9

(379.6)

(109.5)

(12.9)

4.8

152.3

(64.9)

749.2




F-61



Back to Contents


Movements incurrent provisions during 2007:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2006

Charge

Utilization

Reversal

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Non-current / current reclassification

Other

As of

December 31, 2007

Tax litigations

48.6

43.2

(15.9)

(4.4)

13.9

(0.4)

1.9

1.0

88.0

Employee litigations

23.5

15.1

(6.0)

(3.2)

0.1

(0.1)

-

(0.7)

28.7

Other litigations

103.9

54.7

(26.0)

(30.1)

4.1

(2.2)

9.5

11.6

125.5

Provisions for work-in-progress & losses to completion on LT contracts

221.6

72.2

(149.5)

(7.7)

13.8

(3.3)

51.9

(9.2)

189.8

Closure and post-closure costs

64.1

7.8

(24.7)

(0.4)

3.1

(3.0)

15.1

3.9

65.9

Restructuring provisions

46.1

13.7

(11.9)

(2.4)

(17.8)

(0.4)

5.7

(1.0)

32.0

Self-insurance provisions

83.1

53.8

(38.6)

(1.1)

-

(3.7)

5.0

1.9

100.4

Other

235.0

98.6

(71.4)

(29.3)

2.1

(1,3)

7.8

(46.1)

195.4

Current provisions

825.9

359.1

(344.0)

(78.6)

19.3

(14.4)

96.9

(38.5)

825.7


The majority of other movements comprised reclassifications between different provision lines in order to improve presentation. The negative movement of €38.5 million primarily concerns amounts reclassified in non-current provisions relating to pensions and other employee benefits.

Provisions of €1.9 million were classified as held for sale in 2007. No amounts were classified as held for sale in 2006 or 2005.

Movements in non-current and current provisions break down as follows:

Litigation

This provision covers all losses that are considered probable and that relate to litigation (taxation, employee or other) arising in the normal course of Veolia Environnement’s business operations.

The Water, EnvironmentalEnergy Services and EnergyEnvironmental Services Divisions account for the majority of the provisions (€269.1220.7 million, €60.6€85.2 million and €59.5€57.0 million respectively).

Contractual commitments

As part of its obligations under public services contracts, the GroupVeolia Environnement generally assumes responsibility for the maintenance and repair of installations of the publicly-owned utility networksinstallations it manages. The resulting maintenance and repair costs are analyzed in accordance with IAS 37 on provisions and, where necessary, a provision for contractual commitments is recorded where there is outstanding work to be performed. These provisions total €267.7 million and primarily relate to the Water and Energy Services Divisions in the amount of €181.0€174.1 million and €87.0€93.6 million respectively.

Work-in-progress and losses to completion on long-term contracts

As of December 31, 2007,2009, these commitmentsprovisions mainly concerned the Water Division (€79.6 million),(primarily engineering and construction activities) in the amount of €113.7 million, the Transportation Division in the amount of €142 million and the Environmental Services Division (€88.6 million) and the Transportation Division (€218.1 million). Changes in consolidation scope mainly concern the entry into the scope of consolidation of VSA Tecnitalia for €28.5 million and the Sulo Group for €25.9 million and the fair value remeasurement of the SNCM provision in the Transportation Division for -€79.5 million. Reversalsamount of provisions mainly concern the SNCM contract for -€55.6 million and a railway contract in the Transportation Division in Germany for -€16.8€100.7 million.

These provisions also include warranty and customer care provisions in the engineering and construction contracts and certain solutions and equipment sales (customer service) activities.



F-62



Back to Contents


businesses.

Closure and post-closure costs

The Group has financialThis provision encompasses the legal and contractual obligations relating to closure and post-closure costs for the disposal facilities it operates or for which it is otherwise responsible. The Group provides for these estimated future costs pro rata to waste tonnage deposited, over the authorized duration of the sites.Group on the completion of operating activities at a site (primarily site restoration provisions) and, more generally, expenditure associated with environmental protection as defined in the ethics charter of each entity (provision for environmental risks).

These provisions totaled €452.7total €686.3 million in 2007 compared to €428.5 million in 2006 inand primarily concern the Environmental Services Division in the amount of €610.6 million in 2009, compared to €508.9 million in 2008 and €51.5€532.1 million in 2007 compared to €10.7 million in 2006 inand the Energy Services Division. Division in the amount of €58.8 million in 2009, compared to €63.8 million in 2008 and €55.6 million in 2007.

The increase in these provisions is mainly due to the unwinding of the discount the change in the discount rate and foreign exchange translation losses in the Environmental Services Division in the amount of €21.7€110.3 million.

Provisions for site restoration cover obligations relating to closure and post-closure costs at waste disposal facilities operated by the Group and for which it is responsible. These provisions primarily concern the Environmental Services Division. Forecast site restoration costs are provided pro rata to waste tonnage deposited over the authorized duration of the sites and totaled €622.7 million €19.5 million and -€18.7 million respectively andat the entry into the scopeend of consolidation of Pannon Power for €31.62009, including €567.2 million in respect of the EnergyEnvironmental Services Division.Division compared to €527.4 million at the end of 2008 and €452.8 million at the end of 2007.

Other provisions concern waste storage facilities in the Environmental Services Divisionenvironmental risks in the amount of €64.8€48.2 million, compared to €46.5 million in 2007 compared to €3.82008 and €66.0 million in 20062007 and plant dismantling in the Water, Energy Services and Environmental Services Divisions in the amount of €15.5 million in 2009, compared to €15.3 million in 2008 and €18.2 million in 2007 compared to €5.3 million in 2006. Changes in consolidation scope concern the fair value remeasurement of Cleanaway provisions in the amount of €13.3 million2007.

Self-insurance provisions

Self-insurance provisions mainly consist of amounts recorded in the Warranties and customer care line in 2006. As of December 31, 2007, such2009, self-insurance provisions total €234.3totaled €247.8 million and were mainly recorded by Group insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries in the amount of €115.1€129.2 million, the Energy Services Division in the amount of €45.7€39.5 million and the Transportation Division in the amount of €35.1€39.6 million.

Other

Other provisions include various obligations recorded as part of the normal operation of the Group'sGroup’s subsidiaries.



F-62



Back to Contents


Pensions and other employee benefits

Provisions for pensions and other employee benefits as of December 31, 20072009 total €645.8€778.0 million, and include provisions for pensions and other post-employment benefits of €486.3€627.8 million (governed by IAS 19 and detailed in Note 34)30, Employee benefit obligation) and provisions for other long-term benefits of €159.5€150.2 million.

Recap: Movements innon-current provisions and other debt during 2008 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December
31,2007

Addition / charge

Repayment /Utilization

Reversals

Actuarial gains (losses)

Unwinding of discount

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Non-current / current reclassification

Other

As of
December
31, 2008

Tax litigations

95.7

40.6

(19.1)

(0.7)

-

1.6

8.9

(0.9)

(0.6)

0.5

126.0

Employee litigations

10.3

2.7

(1.0)

(2.2)

-

0.1

-

-

(0.6)

-

9.3

Other litigations

78.7

16.5

(4.0)

(11.4)

-

2.3

0.8

0.2

(10.0)

3.1

76.2

Contractual commitments

268.1

177.0

(182.8)

(0.2)

-

-

0.4

-

-

(13.9)

248.6

Provisions for work-in-progress & losses to completion on LT contracts

276.4

23.0

(39.9)

(2.1)

-

12.1

24.1

(2.6)

(64.0)

(0.4)

226.6

Closure and post-closure costs

539.6

0.3

(12.1)

(1.1)

-

39.3

10.3

(20.1)

(34.1)

(1.7)

520.4

Restructuring provisions

1.3

0.2

(0.2)

(0.1)

-

-

-

-

-

-

1.2

Self-insurance provisions

133.8

27.3

(36.9)

(0.2)

-

3.6

(2.6)

1.9

(0.3)

0.1

126.7

Other

89.2

28.1

(9.3)

(9.7)

-

1.9

8.5

(4.7)

(6.3)

(0.7)

97.0

Non-current provisions excl. pensions
and other employee benefits

1,493.1

315.7

(305.3)

(27.7)

-

60.9

50.4

(26.2)

(115.9)

(13.0)

1,432.0

Provisions for pensions and other
employee benefits

645.8

78.5

(84.1)

(14.4)

135.5

21.0

(12.3)

(34.1)

-

(7.7)

728.2

Non-current provisions and other debt

2,138.9

394.2

(389.4)

(42.1)

135.5

81.9

38.1

(60.3)

(115.9)

(20.7)

2,160.2


*

See Note 30, Employee benefit obligation.




F-63



Back to Contents


Recap: Movements innon-currentcurrent provisions and other debt during 2006:2008 are as follows:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

Addition / charge

Repayment / Utilization

Reversal

Actuarial gains (losses)

Unwinding of discount

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2006

Tax litigations

50.9

23.0

(7.3)

-

-

(0.5)

-

-

(0.8)

65.3

Employee litigations

2.2

1.5

(1.0)

(0.1)

-

0.2

-

-

0.4

3.2

Other litigations

64.6

27.1

(13.7)

(3.0)

-

0.2

13.3

(0.6)

6.6

94.5

Contractual commitments

295.8

163.7

(163.6)

(1.1)

-

-

0.2

-

(7.2)

287.8

Provisions for work-in-progress & losses to completion on LT contracts

47.7

68.6

(3.0)

(1.0)

-

(0.1)

206.2

(0.9)

(15.9)

301.6

Closure and post-closure costs

306.3

12.5

(13.6)

(13.8)

-

16.0

84.2

(5.3)

11.5

397.8

Restructuring provisions

-

-

-

-

-

-

23.2

-

-

23.2

Subsidiary risks

1.2

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

(0.3)

0.9

Warranties and customer care

114.6

49.4

(20.9)

(2.4)

-

-

1.8

(1.2)

0.8

142.1

Other

99.0

25.0

(13.9)

(4.2)

-

0.6

42.0

(0.6)

(16.7)

131.2

Non-current provisions excl. pensions and other employee benefits

982.3

370.8

(237.0)

(25.6)

-

16.4

370.9

(8.6)

(21.6)

1,447.6

Non-current provisions for pensions and other employee benefits*

665.7

74.8

(83.2)

(2.7)

(37.1)

-

108.1

(0.8)

24.2

749.0

Non-current provisions

1,648.0

445.6

(320.2)

(28.3)

(37.1)

16.4

479.0

(9.4)

2.6

2,196.6

Other non-current debt

203.7

21.2

(14.2)

-

-

-

1.6

(3.4)

(1.6)

207.3

Non-current provisions and other debt

1,851.7

466.8

(334.4)

(28.3)

(37.1)

16.4

480.6

(12.8)

1.0

2,403.9

* See Note 32.





F-64



Back to Contents


Recap:

Movements in current provisions during 2006:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

Charge

Utilization

Reversal

Change in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2006

As of
December
31,2007

Charge

Utilization

Reversal

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Foreign
exchange
translation

Non-current /
current
reclassification

Other

As of
December
31, 2008

Tax litigations

46.5

23.4

(18.4)

(2.6)

0.1

(0.1)

(0.3)

48.6

88.0

25.4

(30.1)

(4.4)

(2.0)

(0.6)

0.6

(13.7)

63.2

Employee litigations

18.4

12.3

(6.5)

(1.8)

(0.3)

-

1.4

23.5

28.7

15.7

(11.5)

(3.6)

(1.2)

(0.1)

0.6

0.1

28.7

Other litigations

142.1

39.1

(58.1)

(14.8)

-

(0.8)

(3.6)

103.9

125.5

51.9

(29.7)

(39.6)

(0.4)

(0.6)

10.7

(4.8)

113.0

Provisions for work-in-progress & losses to completion on LT contracts

111.3

55.6

(92.1)

(3.4)

67.1

(1.7)

28.4

165.2

189.8

58.4

(116.3)

(7.9)

(4.2)

(5.2)

64.0

(19.8)

158.8

Provisions for property. plant and equipment

1.5

2.5

(1.5)

-

2.5

Closure and post-closure costs

53.4

7.1

(17.1)

(2.7)

2.8

(2.6)

19.0

59.9

65.9

4.9

(34.5)

(0.3)

(0.8)

(4.4)

34.1

3.8

68.7

Restructuring provisions

21.8

15.6

(18.8)

(1.9)

29.9

-

(0.5)

46.1

32.0

23.0

(21.2)

(7.2)

1.0

(1.0)

-

-

26.6

Subsidiary risks

18.9

3.0

(5.0)

(1.3)

(0.5)

-

0.4

15.5

Warranties and customer care

145.0

60.5

(50.8)

(6.6)

0.5

(5.7)

(3.4)

139.5

Self-insurance provisions

100.4

49.3

(40.3)

(2.8)

(1.8)

0.6

0.4

0.2

106.0

Other

195.1

117.9

(86.0)

(34.9)

8.5

(1.8)

22.4

221.2

195.4

102.2

(70.5)

(39.6)

(0.7)

(4.1)

5.6

19.8

208.1

Current provisions

754.0

337.0

(354.3)

(70.0)

108.1

(12.7)

63.8

825.9

825.7

330.8

(354.1)

(105.4)

(10.1)

(15.4)

116.0

(14.4)

773.1


NOTE 18.17

NonNon-current and current borrowings

 

As of December 31,

(€ million)

Non-current

Current

Total

 

2009

2008

2007

2009

2008

2007

2009

2008

2007

Bonds

13,264.5

11,097.6

9,009.6

36.9

67.7

1,253.8

13,301.4

11,165.3

10,263.4

- maturing in < 1 year

 

-

-

36.9

67.7

1,253.8

36.9

67.7

1,253.8

- maturing in 2-3 years

1,045.2

61.9

122.3

 

-

-

1,045.2

61.9

122.3

- maturing in 4-5 years

2,951.7

2,726.5

1,020.5

 

-

-

2,951.7

2,726.5

1,020.5

- maturing in > 5 years

9,267.6

8,309.2

7,866.8

 

-

-

9,267.6

8,309.2

7,866.8

Other borrowings

4,382.8

5,966.3

4,938.4

2 946.2

3,152.0

2,551.2

7,329.0

9,118.3

7,489.6

- maturing in < 1 year

 

-

-

2 946.2

3,152.0

2,551.2

2,946.2

3,152.0

2,551.2

- maturing in 2-3 years

1,511.1

1,434.3

1,636.4

 

-

-

1,511.1

1,434.3

1,636.4

- maturing in 4-5 years

779.7

1,941.5

1,120.2

 

-

-

779.7

1,941.5

1,120.2

- maturing in > 5 years

2,092.0

2,590.5

2,181.8

 

-

-

2,092.0

2,590.5

2,181.8

Total non-current and current borrowings

17,647.3

17,063.9

13,948.0

2 983.1

3,219.7

3,805.0

20,630.4

20,283.6

17,753.0


17.1

Movements in non-current and current bonds

Movements innon non-current andcurrent borrowingsbonds during2007: 2009 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December
31,2008

Increases /
subscriptions

Repayments

Changes in
consolidation
scope(2)

Fair value
adjustments(1)

Foreign
exchange
translation

Non-current /
current
reclassification

Other

As of
December
31, 2009

Non-current bonds

11,097.6

2,243.0

(0.0)

(39.1)

(2.8)

15.0

(48.3)

(0.9)

13,264.5

Current bonds

67.7

0.0

(72.0)

(7.6)

-

0.7

48.3

(0.2)

36.9

Total bonds

11,165.3

2,243.0

(72.0)

(46.7)

(2.8)

15.7

-

(1.1)

13,301.4


(1)

Fair value adjustments are recorded in financial income and expenses.

(2)

Changes in consolidation scope are mainly due to the sale of incineration activities in the United States in the Environmental Services Division


(€ million)

As of

December 31, 2006

Increases / subscriptions

Repayments

Changes in consolidation scope

Fair value adjustments  (1)

Foreign exchange translation

Non-current / current reclassification

Other

As of December 31, 2007

Bonds

8,417.5

1,712.6

(1.3)

86.4

(47.0)

(112.9)

(1,050.5)

4.8

9,009.6

Other non current borrowings

5,584.1

486.7

(1,361.6)

1,564.6

8.8

(51.5)

(1,046.9)

(245.8)

4,938.4

Long-term borrowings

14,001.6

2,199.3

(1,362.9)

1,651.0

(38.2)

(164.4)

(2,097.4)

(241.0)

13,948.0

(1) Fair value adjustments are recorded in financial income and expenses.

Non currentNon-current borrowings are recorded as financial liabilities at amortized cost for accounting purposes. Hedging transactions were entered into in respect of certain fixed-rate borrowings in 2009. Fair value hedge accounting was applied to these transactions.

Changes in consolidation scope

mainly concern the Environmental Services Division for €1,331.0 million (acquisition of the Sulo Group for €1,120.1 million and VSA Tecnitalia for €204.7 million), the Water Division for €165.8 million (acquisition of Thames Water for €150.5 million) and the Transportation Division for €83.2 million (fair value remeasurement of SNCM for €62 million).

F-64



Back to Contents


Non-current bonds break down by maturity as follows:

(€ million)

As of December 31,2007

As of December 31,2008

As of December 31, 2009

Maturity

2 to 3 years

4 to 5 years

> 5 years

Publicly offered or traded issuances (a)

8,191.1

10,290.9

12,511.8

1,012.1

2,779.7

8,720.0

European market (i)

8,191.1

8,884.3

11,206.7

1,012.1

2,276.2

7,918.4

U.S. market (ii)

-

1,406.6

1,305.1

 

503.5

801.6

Private placements (b)

288.8

320.2

299.1

 

142.6

156.5

Three Valleys bond issue (c)

267.6

206.1

221.2

 

 

221.2

Stirling Water Seafield Finance bond issue (d)

59.3

88.0

90.7

6.8

7.7

76.2

Other amounts < €50 million in 2009

202.8

192.4

141.7

26.3

21.7

93.7

Bonds

9,009.6

11,097.6

13,264.5

1,045.2

2,951.7

9,267.6


(a)

Publicly offered or traded issuances

i) European market: As of December 31, 2009, the amount in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position in respect of bonds issued under the European Medium Term Notes (EMTN) Program totaled €11,229.4 million, including €11,206.7 million maturing in more than one year. The impact of the fair value measurement of non-current bonds was €188.8 million.

Veolia Environnement issued notes under its EMTN program for a nominal amount of €2,250 million as of December 31, 2009. These issues break down as follows:

On April 22, 2009, Veolia Environnement performed the following bond issues:

-

€1,250 million bond issue bearing fixed-rate interest of 5.25% and maturing in 2014;

-

€750 million bond issue bearing fixed-rate interest of 6.75% and maturing in 2019;

On June 29, 2009, Veolia Environnement performed a €250 million bond issue bearing fixed-rate interest of 5.70% and maturing in 8 years in 2017.

The Series 9 bond issue (CZK 600 million) maturing on April 23, 2010 was transferred to current borrowings (€22.6 million euro equivalent).

(ii)

U.S. market: As of December 31, 2009, nominal outstandings on the bond issues performed in the United States on May 27, 2008 total €1,249.5 million (euro equivalent) and the amount in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position is €1,305.1 million (including fair value adjustments of €34.2 million). These fixed-rate bond issues total U.S.$1.8 billion and comprise three tranches:

-

Tranche 1, maturing June 3, 2013, of U.S.$700 million, bearing fixed-rate interest of 5.25%,

-

Tranche 2, maturing June 1, 2018, of U.S.$700 million, bearing fixed-rate interest of 6%,

-

Tranche 3, maturing June 1, 2038, of U.S.$400 million, bearing fixed-rate interest of 6.75%.

(b)

Private placements: As of December 31, 2009, the euro-equivalent amount in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position of private placements performed in the United States in 2003 (USPP) is €299.1 million (including fair value adjustments of €12.6 million). These bond issue comprise five tranches:

-

Tranches A, B and C, maturing January 30, 2013, of €33 million (fixed-rate interest of 5.84%), £7 million (fixed-rate interest of 6.22%) and U.S.$ 147 million (fixed-rate interest of 5.78%) respectively

-

Tranche D, maturing January 30, 2015, of U.S.$125 million, bearing fixed-rate interest of 6.02%

-

Tranche E, maturing January 30, 2018, of U.S.$85 million, bearing fixed-rate interest of 6.31%

(c)

Three Valleys bond issue: The €200 million bond issue performed by Three Valleys in the U.K. (Water Division) in July 2004, bearing interest of 5.875%, is recognized as of December 31, 2009 at amortized cost for a euro equivalent of €221.2 million. This bond matures on July 13, 2026.

(d)

Stirling Water Seafield Finance bond issue: The outstanding balance as of December 31, 2009 on the amortizable bond issue performed in 1999 by Stirling Water Seafield Finance (Veolia Water UK subsidiary, Water Division), is GBP 99.6 million. This bond issue is recognized at amortized cost for a euro equivalent of €90.7 million as of December 31, 2009 (non-current portion). Stirling Water was proportionately consolidated in the amount of 49% in 2007 and has been fully consolidated since December 2008 following the buy-out of non-controlling interests. This bond matures on September 26, 2026.




F-65



Back to Contents


Breakdown of non-current bond issues by component:

Operation

(€ million)

Final maturity

Currency

Nominal

Interest rate

Net carrying amount

Series 7

02/01/2012

EUR

1,000

5.88%

1,012

Series 10

05/28/2013

EUR

1,000

4.88%

1,025

Series 10 bis

05/28/2018

EUR

750

5.38%

788

Series 12

11/25/2033

EUR

700

6.13%

695

Series 14

06/30/2015

USD

35

4.69%

36

Series 15

06/17/2015

EUR

875

1.75%

(indexed to European inflation)

920

Series 17

02/12/2016

EUR

900

4.00%

922

Series 18

12/11/2020

EUR

600

4.38%

632

Series 21

01/16/2017

EUR

1,140

4.38%

1,177

Series 23

05/24/2022

EUR

1,000

5.13%

1,038

Series 24

10/29/2037

GBP

732

6.13%

713

Series 27

06/29/2017

EUR

250

5.70%

250

Series 25

04/24/2014

EUR

1,250

5.25%

1,250

Series 26

04/24/2019

EUR

750

6.750%

749

Total bond issues (EMTN)

n/a

n/a

10,982

n/a

11,207

USD Series Tranche 1

06/03/2013

USD

486

5.25%

504

USD Series Tranche 2

06/01/2018

USD

485

6%

496

USD Series Tranche 3

06/01/2038

USD

278

6.75%

305

Total publicly offered or traded issuances in USD

n/a

n/a

1,249

 

1,305

USPP EUR 2013

01/30/2013

EUR

33

5.84%

32

USPP GBP 2013

01/30/2013

GBP

8

6.22%

8

USPP USD 2013

01/30/2013

USD

102

5.78%

102

USPP USD 2015

01/30/2015

USD

87

6.02%

92

USPP USD 2018

01/30/2018

USD

59

6.31%

65

Total U.S. private placements

n/a

n/a

289

n/a

299

Three Valleys bond issue

07/13/2026

GBP

225

5.88%

221

Stirling Water Seafield Finance bond issue

09/26/2026

GBP

100

5.82%

91

Total principal bond issues

n/a

n/a

12,250

n/a

13,123


Recap: Movements in bond issues during 2008 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December 31,
2007

Increases /
subscriptions

Repayments

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Fair value
adjustments(1)

Foreign
exchange
translation

Non-current /
current
reclassification

Other

As of
December 31,
2008

Non-current bonds

9,009.6

1,807.6

(37.7)

47.0

442.8

(121.6)

(68.8)

18.7

11,097.6

Current bonds

1,253.8

 

(1,261.3)

6.2

(0.5)

0.7

68.8

 

67.7

Total bonds

10,263.4

1,807.6

(1,299.0)

53.2

442.3

(120.9)

0.0

18.7

11,165.3


(1) Fair value adjustments are recorded in financial income and expenses.

Other movements

17.2

Movements in other borrowings

(€ million)

As of
December
31,2008

Increases /
subscriptions

Repayments

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Fair value
adjustments(1)

Foreign
exchange
translation

Non-current /
current
reclassification

Other

As of
December
31, 2009

Other non-current borrowings

5,966.3

1,102.6

(1,514.8)

(127.7)

6.2

7.5

(1,042.5)

(14.8)

4,382.8

Other current borrowings

3,152.0

 

(1,179.4)

(8.1)

13.1

(41.8)

1,042.5

(32.1)

2,946.2

Total other borrowings

9,118.3

1,102.6

(2,694.2)

(135.8)

19.3

(34.3)

0.0

(46.9)

7,329.0


Changes in consolidation scope mainly concern the reclassificationacquisition of current accounts of proportionately consolidated companies.

No amounts were transferred to liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for saleDigismart in 2007. A netthe Energy Services Division in the amount of €31.0€45.9 million was transferredand the change in consolidation method (from full to liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for saleproportionate consolidation) of the Water Division in 2006.North Africa and the Middle East, in the amount of -€198.9 million.


Increases and repayments of other non-current borrowings mainly concern management transactions involving the multi-currency syndicated loans.

Non current bond issues break down by maturity as follows:

(€ million)



As of

December 31, 2005

As of

December 31, 2006

As of

December 31,

2007

Maturity

< 3 years

3 to 5 years

> 5 years

Publicly offered or traded issuances(a)

6,939.0

7,588.6

8,191.1

65.5

966.5

7,159.1

Private placements (b)

344.0

309.1

288.8

-

-

288.8

Three Valleys bond issue (c)

286.0

292.1

267.6

-

-

267.6

Stirling Water Seafield Finance bond issue (d)

-

-

59.3

5.1

7.0

47.2

Other amounts < €50 million in 2007

288.9

227.7

202.8

51.7

47.0

104.1

Bonds

7,857.9

8,417.5

9,009.6

122.3

1,020.5

7,866.8

(a)

As of December 31, 2007, bonds issued under the European Medium Term Notes (EMTN) Program totaled €9,393.0 million, including €8,191.1 million maturing in more than one year. The impact of the fair value measurement of non current borrowings was -€105.2 million.

During 2007, Veolia Environnement issued notes under its EMTN program for a euro equivalent of €1,881.8 million (recognized in the balance sheet at amortized cost of €1,855.2 million), which break down as follows:

- €200 million at floating rates (3-month Euribor+0.50%), maturing August 2008. The amortized cost of the issue as of December 31, 2007 is €200.1 million. Given its maturity, this bond issue is recorded in short-term borrowings.

- €1 billion at a fixed-rate of 5.125%, maturing May 2022. The amortized cost of the issue as of December 31, 2007 is €987.8 million.

- £500 million at a fixed-rate of 6.125%, maturing October 2037. The amortized cost of the issue as of December 31, 2007 is €667.0 million.

In addition, Veolia Environnement redeemed two bond issues in 2007: a €491 million bond issue performed in November 2005 on May 30, 2007 and a €142 million bond issue performed in January 2006 on July 18, 2007.  Given their maturities, these bond issues were classified in current borrowings as of December 31, 2006.

Finally, two bond issues were transferred to current borrowings given their maturity:

- a €300 million bond issue maturing February 15, 2008,

- the residual balance on a €700 million bond issue maturing June 27, 2008.

(b)

As of December 31, 2007, €288.8 million (including €4.4 million related to remeasurements) remained outstanding on the private placement performed in the United States in 2003 (USPP). This bond issue comprises five tranches:

-

Tranches A, B and C, maturing January 30, 2013, of €33 million (fixed-rate interest of 5.84%), £7 million (fixed-rate interest of 6.22%) and US$147 million (fixed-rate interest of 5.78%) respectively

-

Tranche D, maturing January 30, 2015, of US$125 million, bearing fixed-rate interest of 6.02%

-

Tranche E, maturing January 30, 2018, of US$85 million, bearing fixed-rate interest of 6.31%

(c)

The €200 million bond issue performed by Three Valleys in the U.K. (Water Division subsidiary) in July 2004, bearing interest of 5.875%, is recognized as of December 31, 2007 at amortized cost for a euro equivalent of €267.6 million. This bond matures on July 13, 2026.

(d)

The €108.9 million redeemable bond issue performed in 1999 by Stirling Water Seafield Finance (Thames Water subsidiary) bearing interest of 5.822%, is recognized as of December 31, 2007 at amortized cost for a euro equivalent of €59.3 million (Stirling Water is proportionately consolidated in the amount of 49%). This bond matures on September 26, 2026.




F-66



Back to Contents



Breakdown of long-term bond issuesothernon-current borrowings by main component:


Operation



(€ million)

Final maturity

Currency

Nominal in € million

Interest rate

Net carrying amount

Series 7

02/01/2012

EUR

1,000

5.88%

966

Series 8

04/29/2009

CZK

25

Pribor 3M + 0.67%

25

Series 9

04/23/2010

CZK

22

Pribor 3M + 0.67%

22

Series 10

05/28/2013

EUR

1,000

4.88%

966

Series 10bis

05/28/2018

EUR

750

5.38%

736

Series 12

11/25/2033

EUR

700

6.13%

694

Series 13

03/04/2009

USD

18

Libor USD 3M + 0.55%

18

Series 14

06/30/2015

USD

34

4.69%

33

Series 15

06/17/2015

EUR

600

1.75% (1)

632

Series 17

02/12/2016

EUR

900

4.00%

875

Series 18

12/11/2020

EUR

600

4.38%

579

Series 21

01/16/2017

EUR

1,000

4.38%

989

Series 23

05/24/2022

EUR

1,000

5.13%

988

Series 24

10/29/2037

GBP

682

6.13%

668

Total bond issues (EMTN)

n/a

n/a

8,331

n/a

8,191

USPP EUR 2013

01/30/2013

EUR

33

5.84%

33

USPP GBP 2013

01/30/2013

GBP

9

6.22%

9

USPP USD 2013

01/30/2013

USD

100

5.78%

100

USPP USD 2015

01/30/2015

USD

85

6.02%

87

USPP USD 2018

01/30/2018

USD

58

6.31%

60

Total U.S. private placements

n/a

n/a

285

n/a

289

Three Valleys bond issue

07/13/2026

GBP

273

5.88%

268

Stirling Water Seafield Finance bond issue

09/26/2026

GBP

63

5.82%

59

Total principal bond issues

n/a

n/a

8,952

n/a

8,807

(1)

Linked to European inflation.

(€ million)

As of December 31,2007

As of December 31,2008

As of December 31, 2009

Maturity

2 to 3 years

4 to 5 years

> 5 years

BWB and SPE debts(a)

1,234.8

1,392.4

1,344.7

213.2

307.7

823.8

Finance leases obligations(b)

754.5

751.2

650.4

253.5

137.4

259.5

Multi-currency syndicated loan facility(c)

-

1,109.7

305.4

305.4

 

 

Delfluent(d)

118.3

107.6

108.4

9.9

8.7

89.8

Shenzhen(e)

93.2

105.3

99.1

5.7

9.6

83.8

Non-controlling interest put options
(Note 1.15.5)(f)

309.9

183.6

95.2

84.4

0.8

10.0

VSA Tecnitalia(g)

164.6

100.4

94.5

35.1

27.4

32.0

Redal(h)

161.3

165.7

92.7

17.3

19.9

55.5

Cogevolt(i)

259.7

170.6

91.0

91.0

0.0

0.0

Syndicated loan facility in CZK(j)

338.0

316.3

75.4

75.4

 

 

Aquiris(k)

184.2

175.4

0.0

 

 

 

Other < €100 million

1,319.9

1,388.1

1,426.0

420.2

268.2

737.6

Other non-current borrowings

4,938.4

5,966.3

4,382.8

1,511.1

779.7

2,092.0


(a)  BWB and SPE debts: The Berliner Wasser Betriebe (“BWB” in Water Division) non-current borrowing, proportionately consolidated in the amount of 50%, breaks down as follows:

The debt borne by the operating companies of €1,088.6 million as of December 31, 2009, compared to €1,113.1 million as of December 31, 2008 and €933.3 million as of December 31, 2007.

Special purpose entity (SPE) debts of €256.1 million as of December 31, 2009, compared to €279.3 million as of December 31, 2008 and €301.5 million as of December 31, 2007.

(b)  Finance lease obligations: As of December 2009, finance lease obligations fall due between 2010 and 2031. Interest rates are fixed or floating (indexed to EONIA, euro T4M and euro TAM or their equivalent for financing in other currencies).

(c)  Multi-currency syndicated loan facility: This €4 billion multi-currency syndicated loan facility matures in 2012. Two draw-downs were performed in October 2008, in Polish zlotys and euros. As of December 31, 2009, this syndicated loan facility was drawn in the amount of €305.4 million (€73.9 million and PLN 950.1 million, or a euro equivalent of €231.5 million as of December 31, 2009).

(d)  Delfluent: Two floating-rate financing lines carried by Delfluent BV (Water Division), proportionately consolidated in the amount of 40%, in respect of the Hague wastewater treatment plant construction project. As of December 31, 2009 these two redeemable lines, maturing in 2030, had been drawn in the total amount of €108.4 million.

(e)  Shenzhen: This financing which concerns the comprehensive water management contract for the town of Shenzhen is carried by Beijing Capital VW Invest. Co and is proportionately consolidated (50%) in the amount of €99.1 million (euro equivalent) as of December 31, 2009. This Chinese renminbi yuan redeemable loan matures in June 2022 and bears interest to November 22, 2010, at a fixed-rate of 6.93% (revisable every six years).

(f)  The decrease in non-controlling interest put obligations primarily reflects the adjustment to the exercise price of the put option on VSA Tecnitalia.

(g)  VSA Tecnitalia: Primarily two floating-rate redeemable financing lines in the amount of €94.5 million, carried by VSA Tecnitalia (purchased in 2007, Environmental Services Division) to finance waste thermal treatment plant projects in Italy.

(h)  Redal: This non-recourse debt carried by Redal, Morocco (Water Division), was fully consolidated in 2008 and is now proportionately consolidated in the amount of 52%. It matures on December 31, 2018 and amounts to €92.7 million as of December 31, 2009.

(i)  Cogevolt: This securitization of future receivables was organized to finance cogeneration installations in the Energy Services Division. The debt reflects payments due in respect of the amortization of future receivables over the period to May 2012. The average fixed rate of interest payable on this debt is 5.20%.

(j)  Syndicated loan facility in CZK: This CZK 12 billion syndicated loan facility arranged by Komerčni Banka, Crédit Lyonnais and ING Bank in favor of Veolia Environnement, refinanced in 2005 the five-year CZK 8 billion syndicated loan facility negotiated in November 2003. It includes a CZK 8 billion tranche maturing July 29, 2010 and a CZK 4 billion redeemable tranche maturing July 27, 2012. As of December 31, 2009, this syndicated loan facility had been drawn down by CZK 8 billion (€302.1 million euro equivalent), including CZK 6 billion (€226.7 euro equivalent) maturing on July 29, 2009 and reclassified in current borrowings.

(k)  Aquiris: This financing carried by Aquiris in respect of the North Brussels wastewater treatment plant construction project (Water Division), was secured in December 2006. It comprises two credit lines bearing floating-rate interest. Veolia Eau- Compagnie Générale des Eaux granted a first-demand guarantee to the lenders of the Aquiris borrowings enabling Calyon and the EIB to obtain repayment of this borrowing on June 30, 2010 at the earliest. The Aquiris borrowing of €175.4 million is therefore reclassified in current borrowings as of December 31, 2009.




F-67



Back to Contents


BreakdownCurrent borrowings are recorded as financial liabilities at amortized cost for accounting purposes.

Current borrowings total €2,983.1 million as of other nonDecember 31, 2009, compared to €3,219.7 million as of December 31, 2008 and €3,805.0 million as of December 31, 2007.

This decrease is mainly due to:

a €602 million decrease in treasury note outstandings;

the repayment of the U.S.$27 million EMTN Series 13 bond issue (€22.2 million euro equivalent at historical rates), which matured March 4, 2009.

the repayment of the CZK660 million EMTN Series 8 bond issue (€22.1 million euro equivalent at historical rates), which matured April 29, 2009.

the repayment of a floating-rate financing line carried by Delfluent BV (Water Division), proportionately consolidated in the amount of 40%, in respect of the Hague wastewater treatment plant construction project, for an amount of €17.5 million;

partially offset by the reclassification in current borrowings of:

-

one tranche of the syndicated loan facility arranged by main component:Komerčni Banka, Crédit Lyonnais, and ING Bank in favor of Veolia Environnement, maturing July 29, 2010, in the amount of CZK 6 billion (€226.6 million euro equivalent)

(€ million)


As of

December 31, 2005

As of

December 31, 2006

As of

December 31, 2007

Maturity

< 3 years

3 to 5 years

> 5 years

BWB and SPE debts (a)

2,126.0

2,067.1

1,234.8

264.4

261.5

708.9

Finance leases obligations (b)

802.0

866.1

754.5

289.0

187.8

277.7

Syndicated credit facility in CZK (c)

344.8

363.8

338.0

225.3

112.7

-

Minority interest put options (Note 1.14.5)

177.7

276.0

309.9

100.6

203.2

6.1

Cogevolt (d)

457.0

358.8

259.7

89.0

167.1

3.6

Aquiris (e)

-

164.2

184.2

15.5

15.6

153.1

Redal (f)

128.9

97.3

161.3

33.1

26.0

102.2

VSA Tecnitalia (g)

-

-

164.6

45.0

60.2

59.4

Delfluent (h)

74.4

102.3

118.3

24.7

8.0

85.6

Shenzhen (i)

105.3

97.5

93.2

-

-

93.2

Local authority borrowing annuities (j)

120.3

101.1

67.3

28.1

34.8

4.4

Other < €100 million

1,528.5

1,089.9

1,252.6

521.7

43.3

687.6

Other non current borrowings

5,864.9

5,584.1

4,938.4

1,636.4

1,120.2

2,181.8

(a)

The Berliner Wasser Betriebe ("BWB") long-term borrowing breaks down as follows:

-

The debt borne by the operating companies of €933.3 million as of December 31, 2007 compared to €1,148.7 million as of December 31, 2006;

-

Special purpose entity (SPE) debts of €301.5 million as of December 31, 2007 compared to €318.4 million as of December 31, 2006.

The decrease in BWB long-term borrowings on December 31, 2006 is mainly due to the reclassification of acquisition debt of €600 million, maturing January 15, 2008, in short-term borrowings.

(b)

As of December 31, 2007, finance lease obligations fall due between 2009 and 2031. Interest rates are fixed or floating (indexed to EONIA, euro T4M (average monthly yield on the money market) and euro TAM (annualized money market rate) or their equivalent for financing in other currencies).

(c)

This CZK 12 billion syndicated credit facility arranged by Komerčni Banka, Crédit Lyonnais and ING Bank in favor of Veolia Environnement, refinanced in 2005 the five-year CZK 8 billion syndicated credit facility negotiated in November 2003. It includes a CZK 8 billion tranche maturing July 29, 2010 and a CZK 4 billion tranche maturing July 27, 2012). As of December 31, 2007, this syndicated credit facility had been drawn down by CZK 9 billion (€338.0 million euro equivalent).

(d)

This securitization of future receivables was organized to finance cogeneration installations in the Energy Services Division. The debt reflects payments due in respect of the amortization of future receivables over the period to May 2012. The average fixed rate of interest payable on this debt is 5.25%.

(e)

This financing carried by Aquiris in respect of the North Brussels wastewater treatment plant construction project, was secured in December 2006. It comprises two credit lines bearing floating-rate interest. As of December 31, 2007, the lines had been drawn in the amount of €184.2 million.

(f)

Non-recourse debt carried by Redal, Morocco, maturing on December 31, 2018, of €161.3 million as of December 31, 2007.

(g)

Primarily comprises two floating-rate redeemable financing lines of €131.5 million secured by VSA Tecnitalia to finance waste thermal treatment plant projects.  

(h)

Three floating-rate financing lines carried by Delfluent BV in respect of the Hague wastewater treatment plant construction project. One of these lines is repayable in full on maturity in 2009 (€17.5 million), while the other two lines, maturing 2030, are redeemable loans. As of December 31, 2007, the three lines had been drawn in the total amount of €118.3 million.

(i)

This financing which concerns the comprehensive water management contract for the town of Shenzhen is carried by Beijing Capital VW Invest. Co and is consolidated (50%) as of December 31, 2007 in the euro equivalent of €93.2 million. This Renminbi redeemable loan matures in June 2022 and bears interest to November 22, 2010 at a fixed-rate of 6.93% (revisable every six years).

(j)

The Group assumes certain fee obligations to local authorities under public service contracts. Consolidated local authority borrowing annuities total €67.3 million as of December 31, 2007.

-

borrowings carried by Aquiris in the amount of €175.4 million (see point (k) of the breakdown of non-current borrowings),

-

the EMTN Series 9 bond issue maturing on April 23, 2010, reclassified in current borrowings in the amount of CZK 600 million (€22.6 million euro equivalent).

As of December 31, 2009, current borrowings mainly concern:

Veolia Environnement SA for €1,343.4 million (including treasury notes of €302 million, bond issues of €22.7 million, securitization program debts of €409.2 million, the Czech crown syndicated loan facility of €226.6 million and accrued interest on debt of €344.2 million);

the Water Division for €767.8 million (including the company carrying the Berlin contract for €160.1 million and the Acquiris borrowing for €179.1 million);

the Environmental Services Division for €411.4 million;

the Energy Services Division for €367.1 million (including the current portion of Cogevolt financing of €73.6 millions);

the Transportation Division for €52.1 million;

Current debts in respect of Group finance leases total €117.4 million as of December 31, 2009, compared to €141.9 million as of December 31, 2008 and €125.6 million as of December 31, 2007.

Recap: Movements in other borrowings during 2008 are as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December 31,
2007

Increases /
subscrip-tions

Repay-
ments

Changes in
consolidation
scope

Fair value
adjustments

Foreign
exchange
translation

Non-current /
current
reclassification

Other

As of
December
31, 2008

Other non-current borrowings

4,938.4

1,918.0

(147.1)

58.4

10.0

(83.2)

(711.7)

(16.5)

5,966.3

Other current borrowings

2,551.2

 

(174.2)

143.7

(266.6)

119.8

711.7

66.4

3,152.0

Total other borrowings

7,489.6

1,918.0

(321.3)

202.1

(256.6)

36.6

0.0

49.9

9,118.3




F-68



Back to Contents


Non17.3

Breakdown of non-current and current borrowings by currency

Borrowings are primarily denominated in euro, pound sterling, U.S. dollar, Czech crown, Chinese renminbi yuan and Polish zloty.

Borrowings break down by original currency (before swap transactions)currency swaps) as follows:

(€ million)

As of December 31,2008

As of December 31, 2009

Euro

14,662.5

15,444.3

U.S. dollar

2,128.6

1,902.9

Pound sterling

1,254.9

1,282.7

Czech crown

411.3

365.2

Chinese renminbi yuan

476.4

496.7

Polish zloty

318.7

311.2

Moroccan dirham

287.7

166.4

Korean won

39.3

38.4

Norwegian crown

24.0

21.3

Israeli shekel

129.3

109.1

Danish krone

208.3

146.5

Other

342.6

345.7

Non-current and current borrowings

20,283.6

20,630.4


(€ million)

As of December
31,  2005

As of December
31, 2006

As of December
31, 2007

Euro

11,103.5

11,542.0

10,701.8

Pound Sterling

515.8

554.0

1,290.1

U.S. Dollar

655.2

558.2

641.7

Czech Crown

446.8

447.1

418.7

Renminbi (Chinese Yuan)

139.9

183.8

218.1

Polish Zloty

62.5

64.7

88.2

Korean Won

122.4

60.8

49.3

Norwegian Crown

41.7

37.9

28.2

Australian Dollar

137.8

17.4

9.9

Other

497.2

535.7

502.0

Non current borrowings

13,722.8

14,001.6

13,948.0

17.4

Finance leases

The Group uses finance leases to finance the purchase of certain operating property, plant and equipment and real estate assets recorded in balance sheet assets.


assets in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

Assets financed by finance leases as of December 31, 2007 arebreak down by category as follows:


(€ million)

Property, plant and equipment, net

Concession intangible assets

Operating financial assets

Total

As of December 31, 2007

423.5

191.7

284.8

900.0

As of December 31, 2006

433.0

327.1

362.7

1,122.8

As of December 31, 2005

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

925.0

(€ million)

Property, plant and
equipment, net

Concession intangible
assets

Operating financial
assets

Total

December 31, 2009

381.2

146.2

267.6

795.0

December 31, 2008

455.1

173.8

271.0

899.9

December 31, 2007

423.5

191.7

284.8

900.0


As of December 31, 2007,2009, future minimum lease payments under these contracts break down as follows:


(€ million)

Finance leases (in the Balance Sheet)

2008

172.9

2009 & 2010

328.8

2011 & 2012

256.5

2013 and thereafter

381.7

Total future minimum lease payments

1,139.9

Less amounts representing interest

265.6

Present value of minimum lease payments (finance leases)

874.3

(€ million)

Finance leases
(in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position )

Less than 1 year

169.8

2 to 3 years

289.3

4 to 5 years

174.0

More than 5 years

358.3

Total future minimum lease payments

991.4

Less amounts representing interest

228.6

Present value of minimum lease payments (finance leases)

762.8


Contingent rent and sub-lease income for the period recorded in the Consolidated Income Statement is not material.



F-69



Back to Contents


Recap: Movements in long-term borrowings during 2006:NOTE 18


(€ million)

As of

December 31, 2005

Increases / subscriptions

Repayments

Changes in consolidation scope

Fair value adjustments

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of

December 31, 2006

Bonds

7,857.9

1,287.4

(38.3)

-

(138.0)

(40.1)

(511.4)

8,417.5

Other long-term borrowings

5,864.9

865.3

(938.5)

259.6

0.4

(21.2)

(446.4)

5,584.1

Long-term borrowings

13,722.8

2,152.7

(976.8)

259.6

(137.6)

(61.3)

(957.8)

14,001.6


NOTE 19.Revenue

Current borrowings

Movements in short-term borrowings during2007:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2006

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Fair value adjustments

Foreign exchange translation

Non-current / current reclassification

Other

As of December 31, 2007

Short-term borrowings

2,904.1

(1,464.8)

421.4

(16.0)

(132.3)

2,097.4

(4.8)

3,805.0

Short-term borrowings are recorded as financial liabilities at amortized costPursuant to IFRS 5,Non-Current Assets Held for accounting purposes.

Short-term borrowings total €3,805.0 million asSale and Discontinued Operations, the results of December 31, 2007, compared to €2,904.1 million as of December 31, 2006.

This increase is mainly due to:operations of:

Clemessy and Crystal entities, in the reclassification of two bond issuesEnergy Services Division, sold in short-term borrowings given their maturity:

-

a €700 million bond issue maturing June 27, 2008,

-

a €300 million bond issue maturing February 15,December 2008,

the issue on February 26, 2007 of a €200 million bond issue, maturing August 27, 2008,

the redemption of two bond issues: a €491 million bond issue performed in 2005 on May 30, 2007 and a €142 million bond issue performed in January 2006 on July 18, 2007.

a decrease in treasury note outstandings of €624 million.

the transfer to short-term borrowings of minority interest put optionswaste-to-energy activity entities in the amount of €141 millionUnited States (Montenay International) in the Environmental Services Division

and Freight activity entities (primarily in France, Germany and the transfer to short-term borrowings of the Berlin acquisition debt (€600 million), maturing January 15, 2008.

As of December 31, 2007, short-term borrowings mainly concern:

Veolia Environnement SA for €1,937.2 million (including treasury notes of €109.0 million, bond issues maturing within one year of €1,201.9 million, securitization program debts of €342.4 million and accrued interest on debt of €271.0 million);

the Water Division for €964.5 million (including the company carrying the Berlin contract for €600 million);



F-70



Back to Contents


the Environmental Services Division for €372.4 million (including minority interest put options of €141.0 million),

the Energy Services Division for €430.7 million (including the short-term portion of Cogevolt financing of €99.1 million);

Netherlands) in the Transportation Division, sold during the second half of 2009 and,

activities in the United Kingdom in the Transportation Division and renewable energy activities in the process of being sold,

were grouped together in a single line, “Net income from discontinued operations”, for €72.3 million;

Short-term borrowings in respect of Group finance leases totaled €125.6 million as of December 31,fiscal year 2009 and fiscal years 2008 and 2007 compared to €131.3 million as of December 31, 2006.


Recap: Movements in short-term borrowings during 2006:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2006

Short-term borrowings

2,138.2

(239.2)

89.8

(7.6)

922.9

2,904.1


NOTE 20.

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

Movements in bank overdrafts and other cash position items during2007:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2006

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2007

Water

135.3

65.8

12.0

(2.6)

(1.5)

209.0

Environmental Services

96.9

32.2

1.7

(2.2)

2.0

130.6

Energy Services

174.5

(90.5)

8.6

0.3

(1.2)

91.7

Transportation

26.2

(2.7)

2.2

0.1

0.2

26.0

Other

23.1

(20.4)

0.4

-

(1.0)

2.1

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items


456.0

(15.6)

24.9

(4.4)

(1.5)

459.4


Recap: Movements in bank overdrafts and other cash position items during 2006:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

Changes in business

Changes in consolidation scope

Foreign exchange translation

Other

As of December 31, 2006

Water

222.9

(96.9)

8.6

(1.3)

2.0

135.3

Environmental Services

87.4

10.4

7.1

(1.9)

(6.1)

96.9

Energy Services

161.6

(21.7)

27.6

0.2

6.8

174.5

Transportation

32.4

(9.0)

4.4

(0.2)

(1.4)

26.2

Other

2.5

20.4

0.2

-

-

23.1

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

506.8

(96.8)

47.9

(3.2)

1.3

456.0




F-71



Back to Contents


NOTE 21.

Revenuepresented for comparison purposes.

Breakdown of revenue (see note 1.17)1.18)

(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Year ended
December 31,
2009

Year ended
December 31,
2008

Year ended
December 31,
2007

Services rendered

27,305.8

24,441.3

21,826.4

27,998.2

29,033.4

26,284.1

Sales of goods

1,464.8

1,609.1

1,387.9

1,756.5

1,711.9

1,435.4

Revenue from operating financial assets

345.1

351.0

325.8

394.4

398.0

342.1

Construction

3,512.5

2,219.0

2,030.3

4,401.9

4,621.5

3,512.5

Revenue

32,628.2

28,620.4

25,570.4

34,551.0

35,764.8

31,574.1


Sales of goods mainly concern sales of technological solutions in the Water Division and sales of products relating to recycling activities in the Environmental Services Division.

The marked increase in Construction revenue is mainly due to the growth of the Water Division and building activities in France.




F-70



Back to Contents



NOTE 22.19

Operating income

Operating income is calculated as follows:

(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Year ende
December 31,
2009

Year ended
December 31,
2008

Year ended
December 31,
2007

Revenue

32,628.2

28,620.4

25,570.4

34,551.0

35,764.8

31,574.1

Cost of sales(1)

(26,929.6)

(23,427.1)

(20,869.9)

(28,786.2)

(30,013.4)

(25,710.4)

o/w:

Impairment losses on goodwill and negative goodwill recorded in the Income Statement

18.2

10.7

(7.2)

Restructuring costs

(28.8)

(25.1)

(16.2)

o/w: Impairment losses on goodwill and negative goodwill recorded in the Consolidated Income Statement

(6.5)

(302.2)

18.2

Selling costs

(551.3)

(515.2)

(478.5)

(602.6)

(621.4)

(560.4)

General and administrative expenses

(2,757.0)

(2,611.2)

(2,394.9)

General and administrative expenses(1)

(3,338.1)

(3,218.6)

(2,905.8)

o/w:

Research and development costs

(84.6)

(66.4)

(62.9)

(89.8)

(92.1)

(84.6)

Other operating revenue and expenses

106.6

66.0

65.8

196.0

49.4

63.6

o/w:

Capital gains and losses on disposal

106.6

50.9

57.9

Other

-

15.1

7.9

o/w: Capital gains and losses on disposal(2)

183.4

48.9

106.5

Other(2)

13.6

0.5

-

Operating income

2,496.9

2,132.9

1,892.9

2,020.1

1,960.8

2,461.2


(1)

In 2008, as part of ongoing efficiency measures, the Group reclassified certain expenses from cost of sales to selling costs and general and administrative expenses. These reclassifications had no impact on operating income. The impact of these reclassifications on Cost of sales, Selling costs and General and administrative expenses is €256.0 million, -€29.9 million and -€226.1 million respectively in 2007.

(2)

Primarily capital gains on disposals of financial assets; industrial and financial capital gains totaled €213.6 million in 2009 compared to €114.1 million in 2008 and €171.5 million in 2007; financial capital gains on assets classified as held for sale totaled €92.4 million in 2009 compared to €176.5 million in 2008 and €0.7 million in 2007.


(1)

In 2008, as part of ongoing efficiency measures, the Group reclassified certain expenses from cost of sales to selling costs and general and administrative expenses. These reclassifications had no impact on operating income. The impact of these reclassifications on Cost of sales, Selling costs and General and administrative expenses is €256.0 million, -€29.9 million and -€226.1 million respectively in 2007.

(2)

Primarily capital gains on disposals of financial assets; industrial and financial capital gains totaled €213.6 million in 2009 compared to €114.1 million in 2008 and €171.5 million in 2007; financial capital gains on assets classified as held for sale totaled €92.4 million in 2009 compared to €176.5 million in 2008 and €0.7 million in 2007.


Operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses included in operating income in2009break down as follows:

(€ million)

Charge

Reversal

Year ended December 31, 2009

Year ended December 31,2008

Year ended December 31,2007

Operating depreciation, amortization and provisions, net

(2,962.9)

1,071.9

(1,891.0)

(1,632.0)

(1,435.4)

Depreciation and amortization

(1,806.8)

16.7

(1,790.1)

(1,663.7)

(1,518.6)

Property, plant and equipment

(1,357.8)

16.7

(1,341.1)

(1,239.6)

(1,151.4)

Intangible assets

(449.0)

-

(449.0)

(424.1)

(367.2)

Impairment losses

(326.2)

168.2

(158.0)

(138.3)

(47.5)

Property, plant and equipment

(9.1)

3.2

(5.9)

(0.3)

(35.7)

Intangible assets

(77.8)

3.0

(74.8)

(70.1)

(0.7)

Inventories

(36.5)

42.6

6.1

(43.3)

(1.7)

Trade receivables

(175.4)

105.9

(69.5)

(30.4)

(39.2)

Other operating and non-operating
receivables

(27.4)

13.5

(13.9)

5.8

29.8

Non-current and current operating provisions other than replacement provisions

(829.9)

887.0

57.1

170.0

130.7

Non-current operating provisions other than
replacement provisions

(468.4)

453.8

(14.6)

50.3

51.6

Current operating provisions

(361.5)

433.2

71.7

119.7

79.1

Replacement costs*

 

 

(360.9)

(390.3)

(358.4)

Impairment losses and impact of disposals
on goodwill and negative goodwill presented
in the Consolidated Income Statement

  

(6.5)

(302.2)

18.2

Operating depreciation, amortization,
provisions and impairment losses

 

 

(2,258.4)

(2,324.5)

(1,775.6)


*

Replacement costs: all replacement costs for concession assets in the context of public service delegation contracts in France are considered in the Consolidated Cash Flow Statement as investments, irrespective of whether the infrastructure was originally financed by the concession holder. As such, in the passage from net income (loss) to net cash from operating activities, all replacement costs are eliminated under adjustments for operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses.




F-72F-71



Back to Contents


Operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses included in operating income in2007 break down as follows:


(€ million)

Charge

Reversal

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Operating depreciation, amortization and provisions, net

(2,529.8)

1,067.5

(1,462.3)

(1,409.8)

(1,292.5)

Depreciation and amortization

(1,572.1)

24.0

(1,548.1)

(1,356.8)

(1,253.3)

Property, plant and equipment

(1,202.2)

24.0

(1,178.2)

(1,045.8)

(949.3)

Intangible assets

(369.9)

-

(369.9)

(311.0)

(304.0)

Impairment losses

(234.6)

186.6

(48.0)

(59.7)

(40.2)

Property, plant and equipment

(43.3)

7.6

(35.7)

(16.2)

(7.8)

Intangible assets

(1.3)

0.6

(0.7)

(7.8)

(4.7)

Inventories

(9.5)

8.0

(1.5)

(2.4)

(1.9)

Trade receivables

(166.4)

126.5

(39.9)

(38.9)

(10.4)

Other operating and non-operating receivables

(14.1)

43.9

29.8

5.6

(15.4)

Non-current and current operating provisions other than replacement provisions

(723.1)

856.9

133.8

6.7

1.0

Non-current operating provisions other than replacement provisions

(395.8)

450.3

54.5

(99.1)

(43.0)

Current operating provisions

(327.3)

406.6

79.3

105.8

44.0

Replacement costs*

  

(358.4)

(368.1)

(351.1)

Impairment losses and impact of disposals on goodwill and negative goodwill presented in the Income Statement

  

18.2

0.6

(28.0)

Operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses

  

(1,802.5)

(1,777.3)

(1,671.6)

*

Replacement costs:all replacement costs for concession assets in the context of public service delegation contracts in France are considered in the cash flow statement as investments, irrespective of whether the infrastructure was originally financed by the concession holder. As such, in the passage from net income (loss) to net cash from operating activities, all replacement costs are eliminated under adjustments for operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses.


Operating depreciation, amortization, charges to provisions and impairment losses in the cash flow statementConsolidated Cash Flow Statement include operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses transferred to Net income from discontinued operations in the amount of €22.6-€48.1 million in 2007 (primarily2009, -€27.6 million in 2008 and -€49.5 million in 2007.

Recap: Before adjustment for the sale of Montenay International in the Environmental Services Division, of Freight activities in the United Kingdom in the Transportation Division operations in Denmark).




F-73



Back to Contents


Recap:and of renewable energy activities, published Operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses included in operating income in 2006 breakfor fiscal year 2008 broke down as follows:


(€ million)

Charge

Reversal

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Operating depreciation, amortization and provisions, net

(2,166.2)

756.4

(1,409.8)

(1,292.5)

Depreciation and amortization

(1,357.4)

0.6

(1,356.8)

(1,253.3)

Property, plant and equipment

(1,046.4)

0.6

(1,045.8)

(949.3)

Intangible assets

(311.0)

-

(311.0)

(304.0)

Impairment losses

(208.6)

148.9

(59.7)

(40.2)

Property, plant and equipment

(26.2)

10.0

(16.2)

(7.8)

Intangible assets

(7.8)

-

(7.8)

(4.7)

Inventories

(13.4)

11.0

(2.4)

(1.9)

Trade receivables

(152.7)

113.8

(38.9)

(10.4)

Other operating and non-operating receivables

(8.5)

14.1

5.6

(15.4)

Non-current and current operating provisions other than replacement provisions

(600.2)

606.9

6.7

1.0

Non-current operating provisions other than replacement provisions

(287.1)

188.0

(99.1)

(43.0)

Current operating provisions

(313.1)

418.9

105.8

44.0

Replacement costs*

  

(368.1)

(351.1)

Impairment losses and impact of disposals on goodwill and negative presented in the Income Statement

  

0.6

(28.0)

Operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses

  

(1,777.3)

(1,671.6)


(€ million)

Charge

Reversal

Year ended
December 31, 2008

Year ended
December 31,2007

Operating depreciation, amortization and provisions, net

(2,674.2)

1,014.7

(1,659.5)

(1,460.0)

Depreciation and amortization

(1,711.5)

22.2

(1,689.3)

(1,542.6)

Property, plant and equipment

(1,285.1)

22.2

(1,262.9)

(1,173.8)

Intangible assets

(426.4)

 

(426.4)

(368.8)

Impairment losses

(286.6)

146.0

(140.6)

(48.0)

Property, plant and equipment

(8.3)

8.0

(0.3)

(35.7)

Intangible assets

(74.3)

4.2

(70.1)

(0.7)

Inventories

(51.9)

8.6

(43.3)

(1.7)

Trade receivables

(144.1)

111.6

(32.5)

(39.7)

Other operating and non-operating receivables

(8.0)

13.6

5.6

29.8

Non-current and current operating provisions other than replacement provisions

(676.1)

846.5

170.4

130.6

Non-current operating provisions other than
replacement provisions

(379.0)

429.7

50.7

51.5

Current operating provisions

(297.1)

416.8

119.7

79.1

Replacement costs*

 

 

(390.3)

(358.4)

Impairment losses and impact of disposals on goodwill and negative goodwill presented in the Consolidated Income Statement

  

(319.9)

18.2

Operating depreciation, amortization, provisions and impairment losses

  

(2,369.7)

(1,800.2)



F-74



Back to Contents


Breakdown of impairment losses and the impact of disposals on goodwill


Impairment losses on goodwill break down as follows (see also Note 4)4, Goodwill):


(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Impairment losses on goodwill of the Environmental Services Division Israel CGU

-

-

(10.0)

Impairment losses on goodwill of the Energy Services Division Stérience CGU

-

-

(4.7)

Impairment losses on goodwill of the Eurolines CGU

(6.9)

-

-

Negative goodwill recorded in the Income Statement - Water Division

-

11.2

5.2

Negative goodwill recorded in the Income Statement - SNCM

10.9

-

-

Negative goodwill recorded in the Income Statement following employee share subscriptions – Lodz (Energy Services Division - Poland)

10.3

-

-

Other

3.9

(0.5)

2.3

Impairment losses on goodwill and negative goodwill presented in Cost of sales in the Income Statement

18.2

10.7

(7.2)

Impact of the partial sale of the Energy Services Division Clemessy CGU following the sale of the Nuclear business

-

-

(14.0)

Impact of the partial sale of the Energy Services Division Germany CGU following the sale of the Facility Management business

-

-

(6.8)

Corrections to purchase price allocations in the Water Division Germany CGU

-

(2.8)

-

Impairment losses on goodwill of the Transportation Division Germany CGU

-

(7.3)

-

Impairment losses and impact of disposals on goodwill presented in Other operating revenue and expenses in the Income Statement

-

(10.1)

(20.8)

Impairment losses and impact of disposals on goodwill and negative presented in the Income Statement

18.2

0.6

(28.0)


Restructuring costs


(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Restructuring expenses

(29.7)

(30.6)

(36.0)

Net charge to restructuring provisions

0.9

5.5

19.8

Restructuring costs

(28.8)

(25.1)

(16.2)


As of December 31, 2007, restructuring costs mainly concern the Energy Services Division (-€10.4 million), the Transportation Division (-€11.8 million) and the Water Division (-€3.7 million).


(€ million)

Year ended
December 31,
2009

Year ended
December 31,
2008

Year ended
December 31,
2007

Impairment losses on goodwill of the Environmental Services Division Germany CGU

 

(343.0)

-

Impairment losses on goodwill of the Transportation Division “Other European” CGU

 

(37.6)

-

Impairment losses on goodwill of the Eurolines CGU

  

(6.9)

Negative goodwill recorded in the Consolidated Income Statement – Water Division

 

2.3

-

Negative goodwill recorded in the Consolidated Income Statement – SNCM

 

70.2

10.9

Negative goodwill recorded in the Consolidated Income Statement following employee share subscriptions – Lodz (Energy Services Division - Poland)

 

2.1

10.3

Other

(6.5)

3.8

3.9

Impairment losses on goodwill and negative goodwill presented in Cost of sales in the Consolidated Income Statement

(6.5)

(302.2)

18.2

Impairment losses and impact of disposals on goodwill presented in Other operating revenue and expenses in the Consolidated Income Statement

 

-

-

Impairment losses and impact of disposals on goodwill and negative goodwill presented in the Consolidated Income Statement

(6.5)

(302.2)

18.2



F-75F-72



Back to Contents


Restructuring costs

(€ million)

Year ended
December 31, 2009

Year ended
December 31,2008

Year ended
December 31,2007

Restructuring expenses

(39.6)

(34.5)

(29.6)

Net charge to restructuring provisions

16.8

5.5

0.6

Restructuring costs

(22.8)

(29.0)

(29.0)


Personnel costs


(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Year ended
December 31, 2009

Year ended
December 31,2008

Year ended
December 31,2007

Employee costs

(9,826.8)

(8,786.5)

(7,952.6)

(10,554.0)

(10,315.0)

(9,449.8)

Profit sharing and incentive schemes

(169.1)

(165.7)

(153.7)

(172.0)

(171.8)

(166.3)

Share-based compensation (IFRS 2)

(65.4)

(40.9)

(30.3)

(10.9)

(5.2)

(65.4)

Personnel costs

(10,061.3)

(8,993.1)

(8,136.6)

(10,736.9)

(10,492.0)

(9,681.5)


The IFRS 2 share-based compensation expense in respect of 20072009 (€65.410.9 million) solely concerns employee shareholding transactions, including the employer contributionshare option and the free share issue (€49.8 million)allocation plans granted in 2007 and prior years. In 2009, no new share purchase or subscription option programs (€15.6 million).


plans were granted.

Research and development costs

Research and development costs totaled €89.8 million, €92.1 million and €84.6 million €66.4 millionin 2009, 2008 and €62.9 million in 2007 2006 and 2005 respectively.


NOTE 23.20

Net finance costs

The income and expense balances making up net finance costs are as follows:

(€ million)

Year ended
December 31, 2009

Year ended
December 31,2008

Year ended
December 31,2007

Finance income

96.1

202.2

151.1

Finance costs

(880.4)

(1,111.2)

(958.0)

Net finance costs

(784.3)

(909.0)

(806.9)


(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Finance income

152.5

82.8

63.3

Finance costs

(969.6)

(783.8)

(774.0)

Net finance costs

(817.1)

(701.0)

(710.7)

Finance costs and finance income represent the cost of borrowings net of cash and cash equivalents. In addition, net finance costs include net gains and losses on derivatives allocated to borrowings, irrespective of whether they qualify for hedge accounting.

(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006  

Year ended December 31, 2005

Financial liabilities at amortized cost

(891.4)

n.a.

n.a.

Commission not included in the Effective Interest Rate

(4.2)

n.a.

n.a.

Expenses on gross indebtedness

(895.6)

(750.0)

(744.8)

Assets at fair value through profit and loss (fair value option)*

129.5

81.0

62.0

Net gains and losses on derivative instruments and hedging relationships

(51.0)

(32.0)

(27.9)

Net finance costs

(817.1)

(701.0)

(710.7)

*Cash equivalents are valued at fair value through profit and loss.


Net finance costs fell, despite an increase in average net debt from €16,142 million in 2008 to €16,466 million in 2009. This decrease is due to the fall in the financing rate (defined as net finance costs excluding fair value adjustments to instruments not qualifying for hedge accounting, divided by average monthly net debt during the period) from 5.61% in 2008 to 4.76% in 2009. This fall of nearly 1% is mainly due to:

the decrease in short-term rates on the floating portion of the debt (primarily Eonia, Euribor and GBP and USD libor);

partially offset by the cost of liquidity (cash received under the €2 billion bond issue on April 24, 2009 – including a €1.25 billion tranche maturing in 5 years and a €0.75 billion tranche maturing in 10 years – is invested in low-risk short-term instruments with a yield close to Eonia).



F-76F-73



Back to Contents



(€ million)

Year ended
December 31, 2009

Year ended
December 31,2008

Year ended
December 31,2007

Financial liabilities measured using the effective interest method

(962.1)

(1,019.7)

(879.9)

Commission not included in the EIR

(4.6)

(3.1)

(4.2)

Expenses on gross debt

(966.7)

(1,022.8)

(884.1)

Assets at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement (fair value option)*

75.4

137.3

128.1

Net gains and losses on derivative instruments, hedging relationships and other

107.0

(23.5)

(50.9)

Net finance costs

(784.3)

(909.0)

(806.9)


* Cash equivalents are valued at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement.


Net gains and losses on derivative instruments, and hedging relationships and other mainly include the following amounts for fiscal year 2009:

interest income on hedging relationships (fair value hedges and cash flow hedges) of €149.1 million, as a result of December 31, 2007 :the fall in interest rates in fiscal year 2009;

income on the ineffective portion of fair value hedging relations of €6 million;

the remeasurementunwinding of debts hedged as to fair value hedgethe discount on non-controlling interest put options in the amount of €53.5-€11.9 million,

the remeasurement of fair value hedge derivative instruments in the amount of -€53.4 million,

the expense relating to the ineffective portion of cash flow hedging relationships in the amount of -€0.8 million in net finance costs,

net gains and losses on “trading derivative” instruments“trading” derivatives of -€29.519.5 million, including €7.3 million in respect of interest rate derivatives and -€36.8 million in respect ofmainly on foreign exchange derivatives hedging financing (see Note 30) recognized in net finance costs. In addition, €11.7 million is recorded in Other financial income and expenses and -€0.3 million in operating income.

The residual balance under this line item represents interest flows on hedging relations (fair value hedges and cash flow hedges).currency derivatives.

In addition, no amounts were recorded in 2007 in respect ofthe charge relating to the ineffective portion of relationships hedging net investments in a foreign currencyinvestment hedges and the amount transferred from equity to the Income Statement in respect of cash flow hedges was not material.material in 2009.

Interest income on instruments at amortized costmeasured using the effective interest method (including interest income recorded in operating income and in other financial income and expenses) totaled €388€412.6 million in 2007. Interest expenses on instruments at amortized cost (including interest expenses recorded in operating income and in other financial income and expenses) totaled €891.4 million in 2007.

2009.

NOTE 24.21

Other financial income and expenses

(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006  

Year ended December 31, 2005

Year ended December 31, 2009

Year ended December 31,2008

Year ended December 31,2007

Net gains on loans and receivables*

56.8

21.5

61.2

Net gains and losses on available-for-sale assets (including dividends)

10.3

9.7

6.5

Assets and liabilities at fair value through profit and loss

5.5

(21.6)

(6.1)

Net gains on loans and receivables(1)

13.9

43.3

55.6

Net gains and losses on available-for-sale assets(2)

8.0

9.3

10.3

Assets and liabilities at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement

(22.9)

35.1

5.4

Unwinding of the discount on provisions

(60.8)

(15.9)

(17.3)

(83.0)

(73.3)

(59.4)

Foreign exchange gains and losses

(2.8)

(14.3)

14.3

(10.7)

(42.8)

(2.2)

Other expenses

(7.6)

(13.4)

(30.5)

(15.6)

(10.8)

(7.4)

Other financial income and expenses

1.4

(34.0)

28.1

(110.3)

(39.2)

2.3

*

including impairment losses of €7.7 million in 2007, compared to €8.4 million in 2006


(1)

including impairment losses of -€11.8 million in 2009, compared to -€4.9 million in 2008 and -€7.1 million in 2007.

(2)

including dividends received of €8.7 million in 2009, compared to €8.4 million in 2008 and €8.8 million in 2007.


(1)

including impairment losses of -€11.8 million in 2009, compared to -€4.9 million in 2008 and -€7.1 million in 2007.

(2)

including dividends received of €8.7 million in 2009, compared to €8.4 million in 2008 and €8.8 million in 2007.

Other financial income and expenses improveddecreased from a net expense of €34.0-€39.2 million in 20062008, to a net incomeexpense of €1.4-€110.3 million in 2007.2009.

This improvement in the contribution of other financial income and expensesdownturn is mainly due to:

- the reversal of the foreign exchange position for €11,5

a -€29.4 million

- the remeasurement of embedded derivatives for €26.9 million (other income and expenses); the impact of the remeasurement of derivatives embedded in contracts and in particular certain industrial contracts in South Korea was €10.6 million in 2007, compared to -€16.3 million in 2006.

- an increase decrease in net gains on loans and receivablesreceivables;

fair value adjustments for -€58 million, including -€60 million in respect of €34.6 million (including interest income of €26.5 million on the Berlin drainage receivable),

- offset by an increaseindexing clauses in the negative impact of the unwinding of the discount on provisions of -€44.9 million. The increase in the unwinding of long-term provisions in 2007 concerns SNCM (provision for onerous contracts), pension commitments and provisions for closure and post-closure costs at waste storage facilities in the Environmental Services Division.Water Division contracts.



F-77F-74



Back to Contents


NOTE 25.22

Income tax expense

Analysis of the Income Tax Expenseincome tax expense

The income tax expense breaks down as follows:

(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Year ended
December 31, 2009

Year ended
December 31,2008

Year ended
December 31,2007

Current income tax expense

(416.3)

(330.9)

(309.4)

(303.4)

(375.9)

(407.1)

France

(110.0)

(75.1)

(95.1)

(79.7)

(90.1)

(108.8)

Other countries

(306.3)

(255.8)

(214.3)

(223.7)

(285.8)

(298.3)

Deferred income tax expense (credit)

(3.8)

(78.7)

(113.0)

61.2

(86.1)

7.4

France

(96.0)

(103.1)

(49.2)

9.8

(29.6)

(95.4)

Other countries

92.2

24.4

(63.8)

51.4

(56.5)

102.8

Total income tax expense

(420.1)

(409.6)

(422.4)

(242.2)

(462.0)

(399.7)

A number of French subsidiaries elected to form a consolidated tax group with Veolia Environnement as the head company, with effect from January 1, 2001 (five-year agreement, renewed in 2006). Veolia Environnement is liable to the French treasury department for the full income tax charge, calculated based on the group tax return. Any tax savings are recognized at the level of Veolia Environnement SA level.SA.

Veolia Environnement reorganized itsThe U.S. tax group was reorganized in 2006 and 2007.2006. This reorganization is still being reviewed by the U.S. tax authorities (see Notes 12 and 37)35).

The increase in theGroup bears a net income tax expense of -€242.2 million in 2007fiscal year 2009, compared to -€462.0 million in fiscal year 2008.

As a percentage of net income from continuing operations adjusted for this tax charge and the share of net income of associates, the effective tax rate is 21.5% in 2009 compared to 45.6% in 2008.

The decrease in this tax rate is mainly due to:

an increasethe inclusion in the Group scope2008 effective tax rate of consolidationthe consequences of unfavorable changes in regulations, asset impairments without tax savings and pre-tax income, which increased boththe contribution of loss-making subsidiaries without profit forecasts enabling the future recovery of these losses;

the positive impact in 2009 of the low tax rate applicable to capital gains on disposals and the capitalization of additional tax losses in the United States in the amount of €43 million.

Effective tax rate

 

Year ended
December 31, 2009

Year ended
December 31,2008

Year ended
December 31,2007

Net income from ordinary activities before tax

1,125.5

1,012.6

1,656.5

Income tax expense

(242.2)

(462.0)

(399.7)

Legal tax rate

34.43%

34.43%

34.43%

Impairment losses on goodwill not deductible for tax purposes

0.15%

8.81%

+0.11%

Differences in tax rate

-2.88%

-0.38%

-7.56%

Effect of tax projections

-9.66%

-6.62%

-4.70%

Dividends

+4.3%

+2.66%

+2.15%

Taxation without basis

+1.32%

+4.50%

+1.68%

Capital gains and losses on disposals

-6.32%

-1.38%

-1.69%

Other

+0.2%

+3.61%

-0.30%

Effective tax rate

21.5%

45.6%

24.1%


The effective tax rate is computed by dividing the current and deferred tax expense;expense by pre-tax net income from continuing operations before the share of net income of associates.



a decrease in the tax rate in a significant number of countries with a total positive impact of €62.0 million in respect of deferred tax liability balances (including an impact of €54.6 million in Germany and the United Kingdom);

an improvement in the probability of using ordinary tax losses of the U.S. tax group, generating an additional deferred tax credit of €85 million.




F-78F-75



Back to Contents


Effective tax rateNOTE 23


 

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Net income from ordinary activities before tax

1,681.2

1,397.9

1,210.3

Income tax expense

(420.1)

(409.6)

(422.4)

Legal tax rate

34.43%

34.43%

34.93%

Impairment losses on goodwill not deductible for tax purposes

0.11%

0.17%

0.81%

Differences in tax rate

(7.47%)

(5.78%)

(1.70%)

Effect of tax projections

(4.47%)

(6.09%)

(6.62%)

Dividends

2.12%

1.47%

2.48%

Taxation without basis

1.65%

0.71%

1.18%

Share-based compensation

-(b)

0.80%

0.71%

Other

(1.38%)

3.59%

3.11%

Effective tax rate (a)

24.99%

29.30%

34.90%

(a)

 The effective tax rate is computed by dividing the current and deferred tax expense by pre-tax net income from continuing operations before the share of net income of associates.

(b)

Information not material given the new tax provisions.



NOTE 26.

Share of net income of associates

The share of net income of associates increasedfell from €6.0€19.4 million in 20062008 to €16.9€1.4 million in 2007.2009.

This increase isdecrease in mainly due to an improvementthe sale of Compagnie Méridionale de Navigation in the resultsTransportation Division in 2009.

NOTE 24

Assets classified as held for sale, discontinued operations and divestitures

Transportation Division activities in Denmark were sold on August 31, 2007. This business was classified in discontinued operations for accounting purposes.

At the end of Taiwan associatesDecember 2008, the Clemessy and Crystal businesses in the Energy Services Division were sold for a consideration, excluding selling costs, of €299.6 million, received in full on December 16, 2008. Net cash and cash equivalents of the entities sold was €73.3 million at that date. The enterprise value of the businesses sold was, therefore, €226.3 million.

The amount recorded in Net income from discontinued operations in respect of the Clemessy and Crystal businesses in the Energy Services Division in 2008, comprises the net income for the period plus the capital gain on disposal, net of tax.

During the second half of 2009, the business of waste-to-energy entities in the United States (Montenay International) in the Environmental Services Division and Freight activities (primarily in France, Germany and the entry intoNetherlands) in the scopeTransportation Division, were sold for enterprise values of consolidation of€220 million and €94 million respectively.

In addition, the equity associates of the SULO sub-group (Environmental Services Division - Germany).


NOTE 27.

Net income from discontinued operations

During the first half of 2006, Veolia EnvironnementGroup decided to withdraw fromsell its partnership with the Royal Bank of Scotland in the Water sectoractivities in the United Kingdom and to sell its investment in Southern Water. Given the impact on the Water business in the United KingdomTransportation Division and the unwinding of commitments at Veolia Environnement level, this transaction was recordedits renewable energy activities. These businesses were presented for fiscal year 2009 in the accounts in netline “Net income from discontinued operations in accordance with IFRS 5.operations”. This heading includes market value adjustments to certain assets held for sale.

In addition, Group management decidedthe Consolidated Income Statements presented for comparative purposes, the net income of these businesses for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 was transferred to sell Transportation Division activities in Denmark, which were transferred in the accounts to discontinued operations.

The net loss“Net income from discontinued operations in 2007 mainly concerns Transportation Division activities in Denmark. These activities were effectively sold on August 31, 2007.  The amount recognized for the year includes the net loss for the period plus an additional impairment of goodwill.



F-79



Back to Contents


operations”.

Movements in net income (expense) from discontinued operations:operations are as follows:

(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Year ended
December 31, 2009

Year ended
December 31,2008

Year ended
December 31,2007

Income (expense) from discontinued operations

(23.9)

(53.8)

0.7

Income(expense) from discontinued operations

(64.8)

(36.8)

(19.8)

Capital gains and losses on disposal

0.7

3.8

-

92.4

176.5

0.7

Income tax expense

-

50.6

-

(70.4)

(0.5)

-

Net income(expense) from discontinued operations

(23.2)

0.6

0.7

(42.8)

139.2

(19.1)


Breakdown of Net income (expense) from discontinued operations in2007:


(€ million)

Southern
Water (1)

Danish transportation activities (2)

Total

Income (expense) from discontinued operations

(1.9)

(22.0)

(23.9)

Capital gains and losses on disposal

-

0.7

0.7

Income tax expense

-

-

-

Net income (expense) from discontinued operations

(1.9)

(21.3)

(23.2)

(1) activity sold in 2006.

(2) decision made in 2006, sold in 2007.



The main Income Statement items for discontinued operations for the year endedDecember 31, 20072009 arebreaks down by division as follows:

(€ million)

Southern
Water

Danish transportation activities

Total

Revenue

-

65.5

65.5

Operating income

(1.9)

(20.5)

(22.4)

Financial items

-

(1.5)

(1.5)

Income tax expense

-

-

-

Share of net income of associates

-

-

-

Minority interests

-

-

-

Income (expense) from discontinued operations

(1.9)

(22,0)

(23.9)



Breakdown of Net income from discontinued operations in 2006.


(€ million)

Southern
Water

Danish transportation activities

Total

Environmental Services

Transportation

Energy Services

Total

Income (expense) from discontinued operations

(1.9)

(51.9)

(53.8)

(0.1)

(52.6)

(12.1)

 (64.8)

Capital gains and losses on disposal

3.8

-

3.8

134.6

(42.2)

 

 92.4

Income tax expense

50.6

-

50.6

(70.4)

 

 (70.4)

Net income (expense) from discontinued operations

52.5

(51.9)

0.6

64.1

(94.8)

(12.1)

 (42.8)




F-80F-76



Back to Contents


The main Consolidated Income Statement items for discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 are2009 break down by division as follows:


(€ million)

Southern Water

Danish transportation activities

Total

Environmental Services

Transportation

Energy Services

Total

Revenue

-

108.2

108.2

143.9

247.7

18.2

409.8

Operating income

(4.4)

(51.2)

(55.6)

-

(44.3)

(11.2)

(55.5)

Financial items

-

(2.6)

(2.6)

(0.1)

(9.2)

1.8

(7.5)

Income tax expense

-

1.9

1.9

-

1.1

(0.5)

0.6

Share of net income of associates

2.5

-

2.5

-

(0.2)

(2.2)

(2.4)

Minority interests

-

-

-

Income (expense) from discontinued operations

(1.9)

(51.9)

(53.8)

(0.1)

(52.6)

(12.1)

(64.8)


Breakdown of netNet income (expense) from discontinued operations in 2005.2008 breaks down by division as follows:


(€ million)

Southern Water

Danish transportation activities

Total

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Total

Income(expense) from discontinued operations

8.4

(7.7)

0.7

Income (expense) from discontinued operations

1.9

12.5

2.5

(53.7)

(36.8)

Capital gains and losses on disposal

-

-

-

-

-

176.5

-

176.5

Income tax expense

-

-

-

-

-

(0.5)

-

(0.5)

Net income (expense) from discontinued operations

8.4

(7.7)

0.7

1.9

12.5

178.5

(53.7)

139.2


The main Consolidated Income Statement items for discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2005 are2008 break down by division as follows:

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Total

Revenue

-

171.6

623.2

266.0

1,060.8

Operating income

1.9

20.3

5.6

(28.6)

(0.8)

Financial items

-

(1.2)

0.4

(26.0)

(26.8)

Income tax expense

-

(6.6)

(2.5)

0.9

(8.2)

Share of net income of associates

-

-

(1.0)

-

(1.0)

Income (expense) from discontinued operations

1.9

12.5

2.5

(53.7)

(36.8)


(€ million)

Southern Water

Danish transportation activities

Total

Revenue

-

122.7

122.7

Operating income

-

(6.0)

(6.0)

Financial items

-

(1.7)

(1.7)

Income tax expense

-

-

-

Share of net income of associates

8.4

-

8.4

Minority interests

-

-

-

Income(expense) from discontinued operations

8.4

(7.7)

0.7




F-81



Back to Contents


NOTE 28.

Net income for the year attributable to minority interests

Net income attributable to minority interests(expense) from discontinued operations in2007 breaks down by division as follows:

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Total

Income (expense) from discontinued operations

(1.9)

1.7

11.4

(31.0)

(19.8)

Capital gains and losses on disposal

-

-

-

0.7

0.7

Income tax expense

    

-

Net income (expense) from discontinued operations

(1.9)

1.7

11.4

(30.3)

(19.1)


The main Consolidated Income Statement items for discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2007 is €326.9 million, comparedbreak down by division as follows:

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Total

Revenue

157.1

696.0

266.5

1,119.6

Operating income

(1.9)

21.7

14.4

(20.8)

13.4

Financial items

(2.0)

(1.0)

(9.6)

(12.6)

Income tax expense

(18.0)

(2.2)

(0.2)

(20.4)

Share of net income of associates

 -

0.2

(0.4)

(0.2)

Income (expense) from discontinued operations

(1.9)

1.7

11.4

(31.0)

(19.8)




F-77



Back to €236.2 million forContents


The statement of financial position of the year endedsub-groups sold or in the progress of being sold are as follows:

Montenay International sub-group (Environmental Services)

The statement of financial position as of December 31, 2006. This item concerns minority interests2008 and December 31, 2007 of the North American portfolio of incineration contracts sold during 2009 is as follows.

(€ million)

As of f

As of f

 

December 31, 2008

December 31, 2007

ASSETS

  

Non-current assets

130.7

131.7

Current assets

51.8

50.0

Cash and cash equivalents

15

4.3

Total assets

197.5

186.0

EQUITY AND LIABILITIES

 

 

Equity

123.5

116.2

Non-current liabilities

59.0

64.8

Current liabilities

15.0

5.0

Total equity and liabilities

197.5

186.0


Freight sub-group (Transportation)

The statement of financial position as of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 of the Freight business, primarily in subsidiaries.France, Germany and the Netherlands, sold during 2009 is as follows:

(€ million)

As of f

As of f

 

December 31, 2008

December 31, 2007

ASSETS

  

Non-current assets

203.3

172.5

Current assets

102.1

68.0

Cash and cash equivalents

12.8

3.4

Total assets

318.2

243.9

EQUITY AND LIABILITIES

  

Equity

53.0

79.4

Non-current liabilities

20.4

11.0

Current liabilities

244.8

153.5

Total equity and liabilities

318.2

243.9


Businesses in the process of being sold impacted the Group Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as follows:

(€ million)

As of

As of

As of

 

December 31, 2009

December 31, 2008

December 31, 2007

Assets classified as held for sale

722.6

203.0

122.5

    

Liabilities directly associated with assets classified a held for sale

309.4

98.2

1.9


As of December 31, 2009, assets classified as held for sale mainly concern certain French subsidiaries held jointly with Suez Environnement, as was the case at December 31, 2008, renewable energy activities, the transportation business in the United Kingdom and Dalkia Usti businesses (Czech Republic).



F-78



Back to Contents


NOTE 25

Net income for the year attributable to minoritynon-controlling interests

Net income attributable to non-controlling interests for the year ended December 31, 2009 is €257.8 million, compared to €304.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 and €326.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007. In 2008, this item included the share of non-controlling interests in the capital gain realized on the sale of Clemessy and Crystal in the Energy Services Division for €60 million.

Net income for the year attributable to non-controlling interests breaks down by division as follows:follows

(€ million)

 

Year ended
December 31, 2009

Year ended
December 31,2008

Year ended
December 31,2007

Water

(a)

144.7

118.9

178.9

Environmental Services

 

4.7

18.3

21.8

Energy Services

(b)

97.9

144.8

96.4

Transportation

 

6.6

19.4

28.9

Other

 

3.9

2.7

0.9

Non-controlling interests

 

257.8

304.1

326.9


(a)

 Including non-controlling interests in Germany (Berlin water services company and Stadtwerke of Braunschweig) of €120.5 million in 2007, €75.9 million in 2008 and €96.4 million in 2009.

(b)

Including EDF’s interest in Dalkia Holding of €68.2 million in 2007, €121.7 million in 2008 and €63.1 million in 2009.


(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Water (a)

178.9

115.7

83.1

Environmental Services

21.8

18.6

25.7

Energy Services (b)

96.4

87.1

54.7

Transportation

28.9

14.7

9.7

Other

0.9

0.1

(0.3)

Minority interests

326.9

236.2

172.9

(a)

Including minority interests in Germany (Berlin water services company and Stadtwerke of Braunschweig): €69 million in 2006 and €120.5 million in 2007.

(b)

Including EDF's interest in Dalkia Holding of €58.1 million in 2006 and €68.2 million for 2007 and the Lodz contract for €13.1 million in 2006 and €21.4 million in 2007.


NOTE 29.26

Earnings per share

Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income attributable to ordinary shareholders of the parent company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the fiscal year.

Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income attributable to ordinary shareholders of the parent company by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the fiscal year plus the weighted average number of ordinary shares that would be issued following the conversion into ordinary shares of all potentially dilutive ordinary shares.



The weighted average number of shares outstanding used to calculate earnings per share for 2008 and 2007 was adjusted following the scrip dividend performed in June 2009.



F-82F-79



Back to Contents


Net income and the number of shares used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share are presented below for all activities.businesses.

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Year ended
December 31,
2009

Year ended
December 31,
2008

Year ended
December 31,
2007

Weighted average number of ordinary shares (in millions)

     

Weighted average number of ordinary shares for the calculation of basic earnings per share

430.0

398.8

395.6

471.7

462.2

434.8

Theoretical number of additional shares resulting from the exercise of share purchase and subscription options

5.0

3.6

2.0

 

1.8

5.0

Weighted average number of ordinary shares for the calculation of diluted earnings per share (in millions)

435.0

402.4

397.6

471.7

464.0

439.8

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent per share (€ million)

   

Net income for the year attributable to equity holders of the parent

927.9

758.7

622.2

Net income attributable to equity holders of the parent per share:

   

Net income attributable to owners of the Company per share (€ million)

  

Net income attributable to owners of the Company

584.1

405.1

927.9

Net income attributable to owners of the Company per share:

  

Basic

2.16

1.90

1.57

1.24

0.88

2.13

Diluted

2.13

1.89

1.56

1.24

0.87

2.11

Net income (expense) from discontinued operations per share (€ million)

   

Net income (expense) from discontinued operations

(23.2)

0.6

0.7

Net income (expense) from discontinued operations per share:

   

Net income (expense) from discontinued operations attributable to owners of the Company per share
(€ million)

  

Net income(expense) from discontinued operations attributable to owners of the Company

(41.7)

75.1

(25.3)

Net income(expense) from discontinued operations attributable to owners of the Company per share:

  

Basic

(0.05)

-

-

(0.09)

0.16

(0.06)

Diluted

(0.05)

-

-

(0.09)

0.16

(0.06)

Net income from continuing operations attributable to equity holders of the parent per share (€ million)

   

Net income form continuing operations attributable to equity holders of the parent

951.1

758.1

621.5

Net income from continuing operations attributable to equity holders of the parent per share:

   

Net income from continuing operations attributable to owners of the Company per share (€ million)

  

Net income from continuing operations attributable to owners of the Company

625.8

330.0

953.2

Net income from continuing operations attributable to owners of the Company per share:

  

Basic

2.21

1.90

1.57

1.33

0.71

2.19

Diluted

2.19

1.88

1.56

1.33

0.71

2.17

Following the share capital increase in July 2007, the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share was adjusted retrospectively for all periods presented.

The only potentially dilutive instruments recognized by Veolia Environnement in the three periods are share subscription and purchase options.



F-80



Back to Contents


NOTE 27

Additional information on the fair value of financial assets and liabilities (excluding derivatives)

Fair value measurement principles are presented in Note 1.27.

27.1

Financial assets

The theoretical numberfollowing tables present the net carrying amount and fair value of additional shares is based on share purchaseGroup financial assets as of December 31, 2009, 2008 and subscription options.  2007:

  

As of December 31, 2009

  

Net carrying amount

Financial assets at fair value

Fair value

Method of determining fair value

(€ million)

Note

 

Available-for-sale assets

Loans and receivables

Assets designated at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement

 

Prices quoted in an
active market

Fair value determined using models integrating observable market data

Fair value determined using models integrating certain data not observable on the market

Non-consolidated investments

9

174.6

174.6

  

174.6

39.8

134.8

 

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,651.8

 

5,651.8

 

5,656.6

 

5,656.6

 

Other non-current financial assets

11

753.9

52.6

701.3

 

753.9

 

753.9

 

Trade receivables

13

9,081.3

 

9,081.3

 

9,081.3

 

9,081.3

 

Other current operating receivables

13

1,101.2

 

1,101.2

 

1,101.2

 

1,101.2

 

Other current financial assets

11

217.7

53.8

163.9

 

217.7

 

217.7

 

Cash and cash equivalents

14

5,614.4

  

5 614.4

5,614.4

1,310.4

4,304.0

 

Total

 

22,594.9

281.0

16,699.5

5 614.4

22,599.7

1,350.2

21,249.5

 


  

As of December 31, 2008

  

Net carrying amount

Financial assets at fair value

Fair value

Method of determining fair value

(€ million)

Note

 

Available-for-sale assets

Loans and receivables

Assets designated at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement

 

Prices quoted in an
active market

Fair value determined using models integrating observable market data

Fair value determined using models integrating certain data not observable on the market

Non-consolidated investments

9

202.8

202.8

  

202.8

X

X

 

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,751.2

 

5,751.2

 

5,666 .9

 

X

 

Other non-current financial assets

11

817.3

77.7

739.6

 

817.3

 

X

 

Trade receivables

13

9,702.0

 

9,702.0

 

9,702.0

 

X

 

Other current operating receivables

13

1,254.5

 

1,254.5

 

1,254.5

 

X

 

Other current financial assets

11

321.4

66.0

255.4

 

321.4

X

X

X

Cash and cash equivalents

14

3,849.6

  

3,849.6

3,849.6

X

X

 

Total

 

21,898.8

346.5

17,702.7

3,849.6

21,814.5

   




F-81



Back to Contents



  

As of December 31, 2007

  

Net carrying amount per IAS 39 category

Fair value

(€ million)

Note

Total

Available-for-sale assets

Loans and receivables

Assets designated at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement

Total

Available-for-sale assets

Loans and receivables

Assets designated at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement

Non-consolidated investments

9

256.1

256.1

-

-

256.1

256.1

-

-

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,627.6

-

5,627.6

-

5,666.2

-

5,666.2

-

Other non-current financial assets

11

746.0

231.0

515.0

-

746.0

231.0

515.0

-

Trade receivables

13

9,303.7

-

9,303.7

-

9,303.7

-

9,303.7

-

Other current operating receivables

13

1,433.0

-

1,433.0

-

1,433.0

-

1,433.0

-

Other current financial assets

11

330.0

177.2

152.8

-

330.0

177.2

152.8

-

Cash and cash equivalents

14

3,115.6

-

-

3,115.6

3,115.6

-

-

3,115.6

Total

 

20,812.0

664.3

17,032.1

3,115.6

20,850.6

664.3

17,070.7

3,115.6


27.2

Financial liabilities

The numberfollowing tables present the net carrying amount and fair value of additional shares is calculated taking into account the difference between the 2000 plan exercise pricefinancial liabilities by category as of €31.41, the 2001 plan exercise price of €40.59, the 2002 plan exercise plan of €36.65, the 2003 plan exercise price of €22.14, the 2004 plan exercise price of €24.32December 31, 2009, 2008 and the 2006 plan exercise price of €44.03 and the average price of the Veolia Environnement share in 2007 of €57.40.2007:

  

As of December 31, 2009

  

Net carrying amount

Financial liability at fair value

Fair value

Method of determining fair value

(€ million)

Note

Total

Liabilities at amortized cost

Liabilities at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement

Liabilities at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement and held for trading

Total

Prices quoted in an
active market

Fair value determined using models integrating observable market data

Fair value determined using models integrating certain data not observable on the market

Borrowings and other financial liabilities

         

- non-current bonds

17

13,264.5

13,264.5

  

13,810.5

13,321.2

489.3

 

- other non-current borrowings

17

4,382.8

4,382.8

  

4,385.3

 

4,385.3

 

- current borrowings

14

2,983.1

2,983.1

  

2,983.1

 

2,983.1

 

- bank overdrafts and other cash position items

14

454.9

454.9

  

454.9

 

454.9

 

Trade payables

13

5,311.0

5,311.0

  

5,311.0

 

5,311.0

 

Other operating payables

13

4,933.4

4,933.4

  

4,933.4

 

4,933.4

 

Total

 

31,329.7

31,329.7

  

31,878.2

13,321.2

18,557.0

 




F-82



Back to Contents



  

As of December 31, 2008

  

Net carrying amount per IAS 39 category

Fair value

(€ million)

Note

Total

Liabilities at amortized cost

Liabilities at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement

Liabilities at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement and held for trading

Total

Liabilities at amortized cost

Liabilities at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement

Liabilities at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement and held for trading

Borrowings and other financial liabilities

         

- non-current bonds

17

11,097.6

11,097.6

9,836.9

9,836.9

- other non-current borrowings

17

5,966.3

5,966.3

 -

 -

5,227.4

5,227.4

 -

 -

- current borrowings

14

3,219.7

3,219.7

 -

 -

3,219.7

3,219.7

 -

 -

- bank overdrafts and other cash position items

14

465.7

465.7

 -

 -

465.7

465.7

 -

 -

Other non-current debt

17

-

-

 -

 -

-

-

 -

 -

Trade payables

13

5,634.5

5,634.5

  

5,634.5

5,634.5

  

Other operating payables

13

5,112.3

5,112.3

 -

 -

5,112.3

5,112.3

 -

 -

Total

 

31,496.1

31,496.1

-

-

29,496.5

29,496.5

-

-


  

As of December 31, 2007

  

Net carrying amount per IAS 39 category

Fair value

(€ million)

Note

Total

Liabilities at amortized cost

Liabilities at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement

Liabilities at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement and held for trading

Total

Liabilities at amortized cost

Liabilities at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement

Liabilities at fair value through the Consolidated Income Statement and held for trading

Borrowings and other financial liabilities

         

- non-current bonds

17

9,009.6

9,009.6

-

-

8,747.8

8,747.8

-

-

- other non-current borrowings

17

4,938.4

4,938.4

-

-

4,761.6

4,761.6

-

-

- current borrowings

14

3,805.0

3,805.0

-

-

3,805.0

3,805.0

-

-

- bank overdrafts and other cash position items

14

459.4

459.4

-

-

459.4

459.4

-

-

Other non-current debt

17

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Trade payables

13

5,343.8

5,343.8

  

5,343.8

5,343.8

  

Other operating payables

13

5,009.4

5,009.4

-

-

5,009.4

5,009.4

-

-

Total

 

28,565.6

28,565.6

-

-

28,127.0

28,127.0

-

-




F-83



Back to Contents


NOTE 30.28

Financial risk management

Group objectives and organizationDerivatives

The Group is exposeduses derivatives to the following financial risks in the course of its operatingmanage and financial activities:

-

market risks: interest rate risk, foreign exchange risk, counterparty risk, commodity risk and equity risk.

-

liquidity risk

-

credit risk

In order to reduce its exposure to these risks and to ensure better control, Veolia Environnement centralizes the management of these financial risks. Activities are based on the management rules detailed in the internal manual "Rules governing financing/treasury management and related risks" widely distributed to Group entities. These rules are based on the principles of security, transparency and effectiveness.

Executive management determines the Group management policy. The Group is organized around a central treasury department that:

-

centralizes Group cash, subject to local regulatory restrictions

-

manages financial risks

-

is the Division counterparty when negotiating derivative instruments

-

monitors Group counterparty risk

The fair value of derivatives instruments recognized in the balance sheet breaks down as follows:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Interest rate derivatives

71.1

113.0

80.9

77.4

195.7

97.8

Fair value hedges

21.2

48.9

45.2

16.3

164.7

2.5

Cash flow hedges

11.8

41.0

6.8

48.4

-

88.6

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

38.1

23.1

28.9

12.7

31.0

6.7

Foreign exchange derivatives

105.2

49.2

56.5

42.7

18.0

31.5

Net investment hedge

78.3

13.6

42.0

4.3

13.9

0.3

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

26.9

35.6

14.5

38.4

4.1

31.2

Other derivative instruments including commodity derivatives

61.8

35.6

64.2

25.8

35.3

25.2

Total derivative instruments

238.1

197.8

201.6

145.9

249.0

154.5


30.1

Market risk management

Veolia Environnement uses various derivative instruments qualifying or not for hedge accounting to reduce and manage its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates, exchange rates and commodity prices. All theseprices (see Note 29, Risk Management).

The fair value of derivatives are recognized in the balance sheet at fair value.Consolidated Statement of Financial Position breaks down as follows:






F-84



Back to Contents

  

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31,2008

As of
December 31, 2007

(€ million)

Notes

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Interest-rate derivatives

28.1

355.0

76.6

389.1

116.8

71.1

113.0

Fair value hedges

 

351.5

8.3

378.9

7.4

21.2

48.9

Cash flow hedges

 

-

59.6

0.3

96.6

11.8

41.0

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

 

3.5

8.7

9.9

12.8

38.1

23.1

Foreign currency derivatives

28.2

58.6

103.9

 172.7

61.7

105.2

49.2

Net investment hedges

 

13.1

17.1

65.1

 8.0

78.3

13.6

Fair value hedges

 

7.9

0.6

    

Cash flow hedges

 

8.8

0.3

    

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

 

28.8

85.9

 107.6

53.7

26.9

35.6

Commodity derivatives

28.3

63.9

43.6

89.4

 107.3

61.8

35.6

Total derivatives

 

477.5

224.1

 651.2

285.8

238.1

197.8

o/w non-current derivatives

 

431.9

139.3

508.4

159.9

123.7

163.8

o/w current derivatives

 

45.6

84.8

142.8

125.9

114.4

34.0


The fair value of derivatives instruments recognized in the balance sheetConsolidated Statement of Financial Position is determined and breaks down as follows:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2007

Internal model with observable parameters

(%)

Internal model with certain non-observable parameters

(%)

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Interest rate derivatives

71.1

113.0

100.0%

100.0%

-%

-%

Foreign exchange derivatives

105.2

49.2

100.0%

100.0%

-%

-%

Other derivative instruments including commodity derivatives

61.8

35.6

27.5%

56.7%

72.5%

43.3%

Total derivative instruments

238.1

197.8

81.2%

92.2%

18.8%

7.8%

 

As of
December 31, 2009

Internal model with observable parameters

(%)

Internal model with certain non-observable parameters

(%)

(€ million)

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Interest-rate derivatives

355.0

76.6

100%

100%

  

Foreign currency derivatives

58.6

103.9

100%

100%

  

Commodity derivatives

63.9

43.6

35.2%

84.2%

64.8%

15.8%

Total derivatives

477.5

224.1

91.3%

96.9%

8.7%

3.1%


Derivative instrumentsDerivatives valued using internal models integrating certain non-observable data are electricity derivative instrumentsderivatives for which there are no quoted prices in an active market (notably for electricity purchase options with extremely long maturity) or observable market data (forward prices for component materials), in particular for distant maturities. In such cases, parameters are estimated by Veolia Environnement experts.


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2006

Internal model with observable parameters

(%)

Internal model with certain non-observable parameters

(%)

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Interest rate derivatives

80.9

77.4

100.0%

100.0%

-%

-%

Foreign exchange derivatives

56.5

42.7

100.0%

100.0%

-%

-%

Other derivative instruments including commodity derivatives

64.2

25.8

13.1%

7.8%

86.9%

92.2%

Total derivative instruments

201.6

145.9

72.3%

83.7%

27.7%

16.3%

 

As of
December 31, 2008

Internal model with observable parameters

(%)

Internal model with certain non-observable parameters

(%)

(€ million)

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Interest-rate derivatives

389.1

116.8

100 %

100 %

-

-

Foreign currency derivatives

172.7

61.7

100 %

100 %

-

-

Commodity derivatives

89.4

107.3

34.4 %

83.9 %

65.6 %

16.1 %

Total derivatives

651.2

285.8

91.0 %

94.0 %

9.0 %

6.0 %


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

Internal model with observable parameters

(%)

Internal model with certain non-observable parameters

(%)

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Interest rate derivatives

195.7

97.8

100.0%

100.0%

-%

-%

Foreign exchange derivatives

18.0

31.5

100.0%

100.0%

-%

-%

Other derivative instruments including commodity derivatives

35.3

25.2

72.2%

4.8%

27.8%

95.2%

Total derivative instruments

249.0

154.5

96.1%

84.5%

3.9%

15.5%




F-85F-84



Back to Contents


30.1.1

 

As of
December 31, 2007

Internal model with observable parameters

(%)

Internal model with certain non-observable parameters

(%)

(€ million)

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Interest-rate derivatives

71.1

113.0

100.0%

100.0%

-

-

Foreign currency derivatives

105.2

49.2

100.0%

100.0%

-

-

Commodity derivatives

61.8

35.6

27.5 %

56.7 %

72.5 %

43.3 %

Total derivatives

238.1

197.8

81.2 %

92.2 %

18.8 %

7.8 %


28.1

Management of interestInterest rate risk

The Group’s exposure to interest rate risk is mainly attributable to its net financial debt. The Group manages a fixed/floating rate position in order to limit the impact of interest rate fluctuations on its net income and to optimize the cost of debt. For this purpose, it uses interest rate swap and swaption instruments.derivatives

The fair value of interest rate derivatives recognized in the balance sheetConsolidated Statement of Financial Position breaks down as follows:


Note

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31,2008

As of
December 31,2007

(€ million)

Note

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

 

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Interest rate derivatives

 

71.1

113.0

80.9

77.4

195.7

97.8

Interest-rate derivatives

 

355.0

76.6

389.1

116.8

71.1

113.0

Fair value hedges

30.1.1.1

21.2

48.9

45.2

16.3

164.7

2.5

28.1.1

351.5

8.3

378.9

7.4

21.2

48.9

Cash flow hedges

30.1.1.2

11.8

41.0

6.8

48.4

-

88.6

28.1.2

-

59.6

0.3

96.6

11.8

41.0

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

30.1.1.3


38.1


23.1

28.9

12.7

31.0

6.7


The financing structure of the Group exposes it naturally to the risk of interest rate fluctuations. As such, fixed-rate debt is exposed to a risk of change in fair value if repurchased on the market, while floating-rate debt impacts future financial results.28.1.1

Short-term debt is primarily indexed to short-term indexes (Eonia for the treasury note program and Euribor/Libor for the main short-term credit lines). Medium and long-term debt comprises both fixed and floating- rate debt. Borrowings are primarily denominated in euro, pound sterling, U.S. dollar, Czech crown, renminbi and zloty.


Exposure to interest rate risk: fixed/floating rate breakdown of gross debt:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Out-
standing

% total debt

Out-
standing

% total debt

Out-
standing

% total debt

Fixed rate

12,129.7

66.5%

11,290.6

65.1%

10,586.5

65.3%

Floating rate

6,111.0

33.5%

6,042.3

34.9%

5,619.0

34.7%

Total before hedging

18,240.7

100.0%

17,332.9

100,0%

16,205.5

100.0%

Fixed rate

9,786.9

53.6%

9,119.8

52.6%

8,494.8

52.4%

Capped floating rate (active caps)

1,401.7

7.7%

1,862.6

10.8%

1,751.0

10.8%

Floating rate

7,052.1

38.7%

6,350.5

36.6%

5,959.7

36.8%

Total after hedging

18,240.7

100.0%

17,332.9

100.0%

16,205.5

100.0%

Fair value adjustments to hedging derivatives

(27.7)

 

28.8

 

162.3

 

Total Long- and short-term borrowings

18,213.0

 

17,361.7

 

16,367.8

 


Total gross debt as of December 31, 2007 after hedging was 61.3% fixed-rate (including 7.7% at capped floating rates) and 38.7% floating-rate. As of December 31, 2007, all U.S. dollar and euro caps in the notional amount of €1,402 million were active.

The Group has cash and cash equivalents of €3,115.6 million as of December 31, 2007, the majority of which bears interest at floating rates.

Net debt after hedging is 74.0% fixed-rate (including 9.3% at capped floating rates) and 26.0% floating-rate.



F-86



Back to Contents


Sensitivity of the Income Statement and equity:

The Group manages its exposure to interest rate fluctuations based on floating-rate gross debt net of cash.

The breakdown of the Group’s floating-rate debt by maturity is as follows:


(€ million)

Overnight and less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total

Total assets (cash and cash equivalents)

3,115.6

-

-

3,115.6

Total floating-rate liabilities

(4,264.3)

(1,180.2)

(666.5)

(6,111.0)

Net floating-rate position before active management

(1,148.7)

(1,180.2)

(666.5)

(2,995.4)

Derivative financial instruments*

-

1,237.3

(2,178.4)

(941.1)

Net floating-rate position after active management and hedging

(1,148.7)

57.1

(2,844.9)

(3,936.5)

*

Hedging financial instruments excluding caps that are out of the money of €82.6 million (primarily CZK-denominated caps).

The analysis of the sensitivity of finance costs to interest rate risk covers financial assets and liabilities and the derivative portfolio as of December 31, 2007. Given the net debt structure of the Group and its derivative portfolio, a change in interest rates would impact the income statement via the cost of floating-rate debt, the fair value of trading derivatives and Group investments.

The analysis of the sensitivity of equity to interest rate risk concerns the cash flow hedge reserve. The impact on equity corresponds to fair value movements in the cash flow hedge derivatives market as a result of an instantaneous change in interest rates.

Assuming a constant net debt structure and management policy, an increase in interest rates of 0.5% at the balance sheet date would generate an increase in equity of €38.9 million (before tax) and a decrease in net income (before tax) of €15.0 million. A decrease in interest rates of 0.5% would have the opposite impact on net income and equity.  

All other variables have been assumed to be constant for the purpose of this analysis and the change in net income and equity is attributable to the variation in interest rates, all other things being equal.

Hedge derivatives:

Derivative instruments may be classified as fair value hedges or cash flow hedges. An interest rate fair value hedge changes fixed-rate financial assets or liabilities into floating rate financial assets or liabilities in order to protect against changes in their fair value. A cash flow hedge protects against changes in the value of cash flows associated with assets or liabilities.

The hedging relationship is clearly defined and documented at the inception.

The effectiveness of the hedging relationship is demonstrated at the inception and throughout its term.

30.1.1.1

Interest rate fair value hedges

The risk of volatility in the value of debt is hedged by fixed-rate receiver/floating-rate payer swaps which change bond issues to floating-rate debt (see Note 18)Notes 29 and 17).



F-87



Back to Contents


Fair value hedging swaps represent a notional outstandingsoutstanding amount of €3,808.8€6,315.4 million as of December 31, 2007,2009, with a net fair value of €27.7 million in the balance sheetConsolidated Statement of Financial Position of €343.2 million, as follows:


Fixed-rate receiver / floating-rate payer swaps

Notional contract amount by maturity

Fair value of derivative instruments

(€ million)

Total

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5years

Total assets

Total liabilities

As of December 31, 2007

3,808.8

499.7

600.0

2,709.1

21.2

48.9

As of December 31, 2006

3,308.3

49.5

499.7

2,759.1

45.2

16.3

As of December 31, 2005

2,587.5

35.2

707.3

1,845.0

164.7

2.5

Fixed-rate receiver /
floating-rate payer swaps

Notional contract amount by maturity

Fair value of derivatives

(€ million)

Total

Less than
1 year

1 to
5 years

More than
5 years

Total
assets

Total
liabilities

As of December 31, 2009

6,315.4

 

2,361.1

3,954.3

351.5

8.3

As of December 31,2008

5,357.4

-

1,812.4

3,545.0

378.9

7.4

As of December 31,2007

3,808.8

499.7

600.0

2,709.1

21.2

48.9


The increase in the fair value hedging portfolio is mainly due to:

-

the set-up of several floating-rate payer swaps hedging EMTN issues, in the total amount of €2,122 million;

and the EMTN Series 17 issue, maturing February 2016,early cancellation of certain EURIBOR-based swaps (Euro Interbank Offered Rate, interest rate on inter-bank exchanges in the euro-zone, for terms of 1 to 12 months) and swaps with extremely long maturity, in the amount of €100 million;€1,165 million.

-For euro-denominated debt, floating-rate payer swaps entered into in 2009 were all indexed to EONIA (European Overnight Index Average, overnight Euro rate).



the hedging of the EMTN Series 18 issue, maturing December 2020, in the amount of €200 million;F-85

-


Back to Contents

the hedging of the EMTN Series 21 issue, maturing January 2017, in the amount of €400 million;

-28.1.2

the cancellation of 3 swaps totaling €130 million, hedging the USPP program.

30.1.1.2

Cash flow hedges

Cash flow hedges comprise floating–rate receiver/fixed-rate payer swaps and purchases of caps, which fix the interest payable on floating-ratefloating rate debt mainlyprimarily secured to finance BOT (Build Operate Transfer) contracts.contracts, to the extent the underlying assets generate fixed-rate flows.


Floating-rate receiver / fixed-rate payer swaps / purchases of caps

Notional contract amount by maturity

Fair value of derivative instruments

(€ million)

Total

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

As of December 31, 2007

1,715.3

305.9

811.1

598.3

11.8

41.0

As of December 31, 2006

1,476.5

94.6

1,072.2

309.7

6.8

48.4

As of December 31, 2005

792.0

251.2

241.9

298.9

-

88.6

Floating-rate receiver/Fixed –rate payer swaps/purchases of caps

Notional contract amount by maturity

Fair value of derivatives

(€ million)

Total

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

As of December 31, 2009

997.2

230.9

202.1

564.2

-

59.6

As of December 31,2008

1,136.4

40.2

416.6

679.6

0.3

96.6

As of December 31,2007

1,715.3

305.9

811.1

598.3

11.8

41.0


-€14.357.3 million, net of tax, was recorded directly in equity (fair value reserves) in respect of cash flow hedge interest-rate derivatives as of December 31, 2007.2009.

Contractual flows associated with interest rate swaps are paid at the same time as contractual flows in respect of floating-rate borrowings and the amount recorded in equityother comprehensive income is released to net income in the period in which interest flows on the debt impact the Consolidated Income Statement.

The increasedecrease in the cash-flow hedging portfolio is mainly due to:

-

the maturity of several lines totaling just under €100 million;

-

the set-up of new hedging transactions for €100swaps in the amount of €17.6 million;

the expiry or cancellation of swaps in the amount of €81 million.

the amortization of the nominal of certain swaps in the amount of €76 million

-

Over and above the volume impact, the increase in the nominal amountfair value of hedges covering project debt by €50 million;floating-rate payer swaps can also be attributed to the increase in U.S. dollar and pound sterling interest rates in 2009.

28.1.3

-

transactions of companies purchased in 2007 for €180 million.



F-88



Back to Contents


30.1.1.3

Interest-rate derivativesDerivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

A certain number of derivative instrumentsderivatives do not qualify as hedges under IAS 39. The Group does not, however, consider these transactions to be of a speculative nature and views them as necessary for the effective management of its exposure to interest rate risk.


(€ million)


Notional amounts as of December 31, 2007

Fair value of derivative instruments

Notional amounts
as ofDecember 31, 2009

Fair value
of derivatives

(€ million)


Total

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

Total

Less
than
1 year

1 to
5 years

More
than
5 years

Total
assets

Total
liabilities

325.0

5.0

20.6

299.4

-

17.9

333.7

250.1

57.8

25.8

3.4

-

Floating-rate receiver / fixed-rate payer swaps

513.8

318.9

150.0

44.9

3.4

0.2

755.2

627.5

41.5

86.2

-

5.6

Floating-rate receiver / floating-rate payer swaps

150.0

-

-

150.0

0.7

-

200.0

-

-

200.0

-

1.4

Total firm financial instruments

988.8

323.9

170.6

494.3

4.1

18.1

1,288.9

877.6

99.3

312.0

3.4

7.0

Purchases of vanilla and structured caps

1,253.2

144.0

909.2

200.0

34.0

-

1,230.1

277.7

752.4

200.0

0.1

1.7

Sales of caps

75.1

75.1

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Sales of swaptions

200.0

-

-

200.0

-

5.0

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total optional financial instruments

1,528.3

219.1

909.2

400.0

34.0

5.0

1,230.1

277.7

752.4

200.0

0.1

1.7

Total interest-rate derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

2,517.1

543.0

1,079.8

894.3

38.1

23.1

2,519.0

1,155.3

851.7

512.0

3.5

8.7


The decreaseincrease in the portfolio of interest rate derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting is mainly due to:

-

the arrival at maturity of financial instruments with a nominal value of €2,300 million (including caps of  €1,400 million);

-

the early unwinding of €300 million of options;

-

the set-up of approximately €450€900 million of new instruments (includingoptions;

the cancellation or expiry of approximately €300 million of financial instruments;

the amortization of the nominal and the decrease in the number of short-term interest ratecash flow hedging swaps hedgingin the treasury note program).


(€ million)



Notional amounts as of December 31, 2006

Fair value of derivative instruments

Total

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

Fixed-rate receiver / floating-rate payer swaps

336.8

-

8.1

328.7

-

1.0

Floating-rate receiver / fixed-rate payer swaps

281.3

239.3

-

42.0

0.6

0.8

Floating-rate receiver / floating-rate payer swaps

803.2

652.0

1.2

150.0

0.8

8.8

Total firm financial instruments

1,421.3

891.3

9.3

520.7

1.4

10.6

Purchases of caps

2,263.7

700.0

753.6

810.1

27.5

-

Sales of caps (*)

772.8

700.0

72.8

-

-

-

Sales of swaptions

200.0

-

-

200.0

-

2.1

Total optional financial instruments

3,236.5

1,400.0

826.4

1,010.1

27.5

2.1

Total interest-rate derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

4,657.8

2,291.3

835.7

1,530.8

28.9

12.7

(*)

Sales of caps are backed in the amount of €700 million by purchases of caps with the same exercise price and maturity and which do not therefore impact net income.


amount of €240 million.



F-89F-86



Back to Contents


The break down as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 is as follows:

 

Notional amounts
as ofDecember 31, 2008

Fair value
of derivatives

(€ million)

Total

Less
than
1 year

1 to
5 years

More
than
5 years

Total
assets

Total
liabilities

Fixed-rate receiver / floating-rate payer swaps

202.4

-

41.7

160.7

3.7

-

Floating-rate receiver / fixed-rate payer swaps

513.9

468.9

2.5

42.5

-

2.0

Floating-rate receiver / floating-rate payer swaps

915.5

665.5

-

250.0

0.5

1.1

Fixed-rate receiver / fixed-rate payer swaps

2.0

-

-

2.0

-

4.0

Total firm financial instruments

1,633.8

1,134.4

44.2

455.2

4.2

7.1

Purchases of vanilla and structured caps

423.4

-

323.4

100.0

3.0

-

Sales of caps

-

-

-

-

-

-

Sales of swaptions

102.0

-

-

102.0

2.7

5.7

Total optional financial instruments

525.4

-

323.4

202.0

5.7

5.7

Total interest-rate derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

2,159.2

1,134.4

367.6

657.2

9.9

12.8


(€ million)



Notional amounts as of December 31, 2005

Fair value of derivative instruments

Notional amounts
as ofDecember 31, 2007

Fair value
of derivatives

(€ million)



Total

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

Total

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

752.8

-

2.1

750.7

6.4

0.5

325.0

5.0

20.6

299.4

-

17.9

Floating-rate receiver / fixed-rate payer swaps

298.2

-

259.7

38.5

-

4.5

513.8

318.9

150.0

44.9

3.4

0.2

Floating-rate receiver / floating-rate payer swaps

866.0

211.9

654.1

-

0.4

-

150.0

-

-

150.0

0.7

-

Total firm financial instruments

1,917.0

211.9

915.9

789.2

6.8

5.0

988.8

323.9

170.6

494.3

4.1

18.1

Purchases of caps

2,533.3

-

1,321.1

1,212.2

24.2

1.7

Sales of caps (*)

769.0

-

769.0

-

-

-

Purchases of vanilla and structured caps

1,253.2

144.0

909.2

200.0

34.0

-

Sales of caps

75.1

75.1

-

-

-

Sales of swaptions

-

-

-

-

-

200.0

-

-

200.0

-

5.0

Total optional financial instruments

3,302.3

-

2,090.1

1,212.2

24.2

1.7

1,528.3

219.1

909.2

400.0

34.0

5.0

Total derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

5,219.3

211.9

3,006.0

2,001.4

31.0

6.7

(*)

Sales of caps are backed in the amount of €700 million by purchases of caps with the same exercise price and maturity and which do not therefore impact net income.

Total interest-rate derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

2,517.1

543.0

1,079.8

894.3

38.1

23.1

30.1.2

Management of foreign exchange risk

28.2

The Group's international activities generate significant foreignForeign currency flows.

The Group's central treasury department manages foreign exchange risk centrally within limits set by the Chief Executive Officer. The Group uses derivative instruments to hedge its exposure to foreign exchange risk (currency swaps, cross currency swaps, currency options, currency forwards).derivatives

The fair value of foreign exchangecurrency derivatives recognized in the balance sheetConsolidated Statement of Financial Position breaks down as follows:

  

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31,2008

As of
December 31,2007

(€ million)

Note

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Foreign currency derivatives

 

58.6

103.9

172.7

61.7

105.2

49.2

Net investment hedge

28.2.1

13.1

17.1

65.1

8.0

78.3

13.6

Fair value hedge

28.2.2

7.9

0.6

    

Cash flow hedge

28.2.3

8.8

0.3

    

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

28.2.4

28.8

67.4

104.7

53.7

26.9

11.8

Embedded derivatives

  

18.5

2.9

-

-

23.8


(€ million)

Note

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Foreign exchange derivatives

 

105.2

49.2

56.5

42.7

18.0

31.5

Net investment hedge

30.1.2.1

78.3

13.6

42.0

4.3

13.9

0.3

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

30.1.2.2

26.9

11.8

14.5

4.1

4.1

13.2

Embedded derivatives

30.1.2.3

-

23.8

-

34.3

-

18.0



Management of foreign exchange transaction risk:

The Group has no significant exposure to foreign exchange transaction risk. Income and expenses are mainly denominated in the currency of the country where the Group operates.  

Management of foreign exchange asset risk:

Financing is secured in the local currency for operations located in foreign countries. In the case of inter-company financing, these credit lines can generate foreign exchange risk. In order to limit the impact of this risk, Veolia Environnement has developed a policy which seeks to back foreign-currency financing and foreign-currency derivatives with inter-company receivables denominated in the same currency.

The asset exposure hedging strategy primarily involves ensuring that Group companies do not have a material balance sheet foreign exchange position that could generate significant volatility in foreign exchange gains and losses and hedging certain net foreign investments (IAS 21 / IAS 39).



F-90F-87



Back to Contents


30.1.2.128.2.1

Hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation

Financial instruments designated as net investment hedges break down as follows:


(€ million)

Notional amount as of December 31, 2007 by currency and maturity

Fair value of derivative instruments

Financial instrument

Currency

Amount

Less than 1year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

Currency payer swaps

HKD

50.0

50.0

-

-

3.7

-

JPY

35.5

35.5

-

-

0.2

-

MXN

1.2

1.2

-

-

0.1

-

PLN

82.7

82.7

-

-

-

0.3

GBP

272.7

272.7

-

-

-

0.8

AUD

7.2

7.2

-

-

0.1

-

USD

451.2

451.2

-

-

1.7

-

SKK

76.5

76.5

-

-

0.3

-

Embedded derivatives (forward sale)

KRW

66.5

15.9

48.1

2.5

7.8

-

Cross currency swaps: fixed-rate payer / fixed-rate receiver

CNY

116.2

57.8

58.4

0.2

12.5

Cross currency swaps: floating rate payer / floating rate receiver

USD

234.9

234.9

-

-

64.2

-

Total currency derivatives

 

1,394.6

1,227.8

105.9

60.9

78.3

13.6

USPP borrowings

USD

247.1

-

18.3

228.8

N/A

N/A

GBP borrowings

GBP

681.8

-

-

681.8

N/A

N/A

Syndicated loan

CZK

189.2

-

189.2

-

N/A

N/A

Total financing

 

1,118.1

-

207.5

910.6

-

-

(€ million)

Notional amount
as of December 31, 2009
by currency and maturity

Fair value of derivatives

Financial instrument

Currency

Amount

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

 

AED

3.7

3.7

-

-

0.0

0.0

 

AUD

7.5

7.5

-

-

-

0.1

 

GBP

67.0

67.0

-

-

2.4

-

 

HKD

199.9

196.0

3.9

-

-

0.5

Currency payer swaps

HUF

86.9

86.9

-

-

0.0

0.5

 

ILS

17.9

17.9

-

-

-

0.0

 

JPY

60.3

60.3

-

-

0.6

-

 

MXN

1.0

1.0

-

-

0.0

-

 

PLN

5.8

5.8

-

-

-

0.5

Embedded derivatives (forward sale)

KRW

92.4

12.1

42.5

37.8

10.1

-

Cross currency swaps: fixed-rate payer /
fixed-rate receiver

CNY

120.0

-

60.0

60.0

-

15.5

Total foreign currency derivatives

 

662.4

458.2

106.4

97.8

13.1

17.1

USD borrowings

USD

1,339.8

-

411.6

928.2

N/A

N/A

GBP borrowings

GBP

731.9

-

-

731.9

N/A

N/A

Syndicated loan

CZK

190.3

190.3

-

-

N/A

N/A

Syndicated loan

PLN

219.8

-

219.8

-

N/A

N/A

Total financing

 

2,481.8

190.3

631.4

1,660.1

  


The above currency swaps are short-term but are generally renewed at maturity, until financing of an appropriate term is secured in the currency of the related country.

Fair value movements compared with December 31, 20062008 are mainly due to:

-

the set-upchange in the fair value of a EUR/CYN cross-currency swapeuro/Chinese renminbi yuan cross currency swaps for -€12.335 million;

-

the change in the fair value of the KRWKorean won embedded derivative for €5 million;

-

the change in the fair value of USD cross currency swaps for €28 million;

In addition, the change in the portfolio (loans and payer swaps) is mainly linked to the financing of new Group assets in the United Kingdom and the United States.




F-91



Back to Contents



(€ million)

Notional amount as of December 31, 2006 by currency and maturity

Fair value of derivative instruments

Financial instrument

Currency

Amount

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

Currency payer swaps

HKD

55.9

55.9

-

-

2.1

-

JPY

14.5

14.5

-

-

0.1

-

MXN

1.4

1.4

-

-

-

-

PLN

78.3

78.3

-

-

0.8

-

SKK

112.7

112.7

-

-

0.1

4.3

Embedded derivatives (forward sale)

KRW

82.5

15.9

52.8

13.8

2.7

-

Cross currency swaps: floating rate payer/floating rate receiver

USD

299.1

-

299.1

-

36.2

-

Total currency derivatives

 

644.4

278.7

351.9

13.8

42.0

4.3

USPP borrowings

USD

285.1

-

-

285.1

N/A

N/A

Syndicated loan

CZK

203.9

-

203.9

-

N/A

N/A

Total financing

 

489.0

-

203.9

285.1

N/A

N/A


(€ million)

Notional amount as of December 31, 2005 by currency and maturity

Fair value of derivative instruments

Financial instrument

Currency

Amount

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Total assets

Total liabilities

Currency payer swaps

NOK

86.1

86.1

-

-

1.9

-

HKD

13.3

13.3

-

-

-

0.3

PLN

76.8

76.8

-

-

0.3

-

Embedded derivatives (forward sale)

KRW

100.3

17.8

57.3

25.2

5.2

-

Cross currency swaps: floating rate payer / floating rate receiver

HKD

44.8

44.8

-

-

1.0

-

USD

299.0

-

299.0

-

5.5

-

Total currency derivatives

 

620.3

238.8

356.3

25.2

13.9

0.3

USPP borrowings

USD

302.6

-

-

302.6

N/A

N/A

Syndicated loan

CZK

211.6

-

211.6

-

N/A

N/A

Total financing

 

514.2

-

211.6

302.6

N/A

N/A




F-92



Back to Contents


-€19 million.

Inter-company loans and receivables forming part of a foreign investment (IAS 21) are nearly systematically hedged by foreign currency external financing or foreign currency derivatives (cross currency swaps, currency forwards) meeting IAS 39 criteria for hedge accounting. Foreign exchange gains and losses recorded in foreign exchange translation reserves in respect of hedging instruments are systematically offset by foreign exchange gains and losses recognized in foreign exchange translation reserves on loans forming part of the net investment, unless:

the inter-company loan forming part of the net investment in a foreign operation is not hedged;

the hedge is partially ineffective due to a difference between the nominal amount of the hedge and the amount of the hedged net asset;

only the net assets of the foreign subsidiary (excluding the loan forming part of the net investment) are hedged.

Net foreign exchange losses recorded in foreign exchange translation reserves as of December 31, 20072009 of €36.8-€46.6 million mainly comprise:

-

a foreign exchange loss of €11 million on an unhedged U.S. dollar inter-company loan forming part of a net investment (IAS 21), capitalized in December 2004;

-

the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on hedges of Water Division investments in China, Korea, the Czech Republic and the United States of -€20.228.9 million;

-

the impact of exchange rate fluctuations on hedges of Energy Services DivisionVeolia Environnement SA investments in Polandthe United States of -€4.9- €10.6 million.

30.1.2.2

HedgingF-88



Back to Contents


Recap: the break down as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 is as follows:

(€ million)

Notional amount as of
December 31, 2008
by currency and maturity

Fair value
of derivatives

Financial instrument

Currency

Amount

Less
than
1 year

1 to 5
years

More than
5 years

Total
assets

Total
liabilities

 

AED

2.8

2.8

--

0.1

 
 

AUD

5.9

5.9

---

0.1

 

GBP

62.5

62.5

--

11.8

-

Currency payer swaps

HKD

171.6

171.6

--

0.2

4.8

 

HUF

42.4

42.4

--

0.5

-
 

ILS

18.3

18.3

--

1.1

-
 

JPY

63.7

63.7

---

0.2

 

MXN

1.0

1.0

----

Embedded derivatives (forward sale)

KRW

50.7

15.9

32.2

2.6

29.1

-

Cross currency swaps: fixed-rate payer / fixed-rate receiver

CNY

131.6

65.4

-

66.2

22.3

2.9

Total foreign currency derivatives

 

550.5

449.5

32.2

68.8

65.1

8.0

USPP borrowings

USD

1,221.9

-

306.8

915.1

N/A

N/A

GBP borrowings

GBP

682.4

--

682.4

N/A

N/A

Syndicated loan

CZK

187.5

-

187.5

-

N/A

N/A

Syndicated loan

PLN

199.1

-

199.1

-

N/A

N/A

Total financing

 

2,290.9

-

693.4

1,597.5

--


(€ million)

Notional amount as of
December 31, 2007
by currency
and maturity

Fair value
of derivatives

Financial instrument

Currency

Amount

Less than
1 year

1 to 5
years

More than
5 years

Total
assets

Total
liabilities

 

HKD

50.0

50.0

-

-

3.7

-

 

JPY

35.5

35.5

-

-

0.2

-

 

MXN

1.2

1.2

-

-

0.1

-

Currency payer swaps

PLN

82.7

82.7

-

-

-

0.3

 

GBP

272.7

272.7

-

-

-

0.8

 

AUD

7.2

7.2

-

-

0.1

-

 

USD

451.2

451.2

-

-

1.7

-

 

SKK

76.5

76.5

-

-

0.3

-

Embedded derivatives (forward sale)

KRW

66.5

15.9

48.1

2.5

7.8

-

Cross currency swaps: fixed-rate payer / fixed-rate receiver

CNY

116.2

57.8

58.4

0.2

12.5

Cross currency swaps: floating-rate payer / floating-rate receiver

USD

234.9

234.9

-

-

64.2

-

Total foreign currency derivatives

 

1,394.6

1,227.8

105.9

60.9

78.3

13.6

USPP borrowings

USD

247.1

-

18.3

228.8

N/A

N/A

GBP borrowings

GBP

681.8

-

-

681.8

N/A

N/A

Syndicated loan

CZK

189.2

-

189.2

-

N/A

N/A

Total financing

 

1,118.1

-

207.5

910.6

-

-




F-89



Back to Contents


28.2.2

Fair value hedges

Financial instruments designated as fair value hedges break down as follows:

(€ million)

Notional amount as of December 31, 2009
by currency and maturity

Fair value of derivatives

Financial instrument

Currency

Amount

Less
than
1 year

1 to
5 years

More
than
5 years

Total
assets

Total
liabilities

Forward sales

USD

48.9

45.8

3.1

-

2.9

-

Forward purchases

BRL

11.1

11.1

-

-

3.4

0.6

Forward purchases

NOK

39.4

 

39.4

-

1.6

-

Total foreign currency derivatives

 

99.4

56.9

42.5

-

7.9

0.6


In 2009, Veolia Environnement Group decided to designate a certain number of currency transactions as hedges as defined by IAS 39.

The majority of the fair value hedges presented above consist of foreign currency hedges in respect of construction contracts or hedging financial assets.

28.2.3

Cash flow hedges

Financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges break down as follows:

(€ million)

Notional amount as of December 31, 2009
by currency and maturity

Fair value of derivatives

Financial Instruments

Currency

Amount

Less
than
1 year

1 to
5 years

More
than
5 years

Total
assets

Total
liabilities

Forward purchases

NOK

115.3

20.3

64.2

30.8

7.1

-

Forward sales

USD

15.6

4.2

11.4

-

1.0

-

Forward purchases

USD

9.8

9.8

-

-

0.2

-

Forward purchases

SEK

8.9

7.5

1.4

-

-

0.3

Forward purchases

HUF

4.3

4.3

-

-

0.5

-

Total foreign currency derivatives

 

153.9

46.1

77.0

30.8

8.8

0.3


In 2009, Veolia Environnement Group decided to designate a certain number of currency transactions as hedges as defined by IAS 39.

The majority of the cash flow hedges presented above consist of currency hedges in respect of lease payments on a boat.



F-90



Back to Contents


28.2.4

Hedges of currency exposure in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position by derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

Fair value

As of December 31, 2009

(€ million)

Total

USD

GBP

NOK

SEK

KRW

Other

Forward purchases

(0.9)

(0.7)

(1.0)

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.8

Currency receiver swaps

10.3

8.2

0.2

0.1

0.1

0.0

1.7

Total currency swaps and forward purchases

9.4

7.5

(0.8)

0.1

0.1

0.0

2.5

Forward sales

(17.4)

2.0

(0.1)

0.1

0.0

(18.5)

(0.9)

Currency payer swaps

(49.1)

1.4

(17.6)

(11.1)

(11.4)

0.0

(10.4)

Total currency swaps and forward sales

(66.5)

3.4

(17.7)

(11.0)

(11.4)

(18.5)

(11.3)

Call options

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Put options

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total currency options

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

(57.1)

10.9

(18.5)

(10.9)

(11.3)

(18.5)

(8.8)


Hedges as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:

Faire value

As of December 31, 2008

(€ million)

Total

HKD

NOK

PLN

Other

Forward purchases

(11.6)

-

(5.0)

(2.3)

(4.3)

Currency receiver swaps

(20.6)

-

-

(1.7)

(18.9)

Total currency swaps and forward purchases

(32.2)

-

(5.0)

(4.0)

(23.2)

Forward sales

(1.6)

-

-

2.2

(3.8)

Currency payer swaps

86.8

28.3

19.3

12.0

27.2

Total currency swaps and forward sales

85.2

28.3

19.3

14.2

23.4

Call options

-

-

-

-

-

Put options

(2.0)

-

-

-

(2.0)

Total currency options

(2.0)

-

-

-

(2.0)

Total derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting(*)

51.0

28.3

14.3

10.2

(1.8)


Fair value

As of December 31, 2007

(€ million)

Total

USD

GBP

Other

Forward purchases

(4.2)

(4.5)

(0.1)

0.4

Currency receiver swaps

(1.8)

-

-

(1.8)

Total currency swaps and forward purchases

(6.0)

(4.5)

(0.1)

(1.4)

Forward sales

9.2

10.2

-

(1.0)

Currency payer swaps

11.5

5.1

3.2

3.2

Total currency swaps and forward sales

20.7

15.3

3.2

2.2

Call options

(0.4)

(0.4)

-

-

Put options

0.8

0.8

-

-

Total currency options

0.4

0.4

-

-

Total derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting(*)

15.1

11.2

3.1

0.8


(*)

Net fair value (Assets–Liabilities) excluding embedded derivatives

The above portfolio of foreign currency derivatives was mainly contracted by Veolia Environnement SA to hedge its foreign currency-denominated net debt (comprising foreign currency-denominated borrowings and foreign currency-denominated inter-company loans and borrowings).



F-91



Back to Contents


28.3

Commodity derivatives

As of December 31, 2009, the fair value of commodity derivatives totaled €63.9 million in assets and €43.6 million in liabilities.

  

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31,2008

(€ million)

Note

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Commodity derivatives

 

63.9

43.6

89.4

107.3

Electricity

 

53.1

18.3

56.3

18.3

Fuel

 

9.1

7.1

22.5

46.5

CO2

 

0.8

0.4

2.1

2.7

Coal

 

0.9

15.5

8.2

15.6

Other

 

-

2.3

0.3

24.2

Pursuant to IAS 39, these derivatives break down as follows:

  

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31,2008

(€ million)

Note

Assets

Liabilities

Assets

Liabilities

Commodity derivatives

 

63.9

43.6

89.4

107.3

Fair value hedges

  

0.3

 

2.3

Cash flow hedges

 

10.0

23.9

32.1

64.3

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

 

53.9

19.4

57.3

40.8


Material contract notional amounts (electricity – see Note 1.24) are as follows.

28.3.1

Electricity

  

Notional contract amount as of

December 31, 2009 by maturity

(€ million)

 

Total

Less than
one year

1 to 5 years

More than
five years

Electricity purchase options:

in Gwh

13,196

1,052

2,934

9,210

 

in € million

696.0

55.2

158.4

482.4

Electricity sales commitments:

in Gwh

3,051

1,110

1,941

-

 

in € million

215.2

72.3

142.9

-


Purchase options cover the period 2010 to 2025 and represent a notional amount of €52.3 million, based on valuation assumptions at the year end. Sales commitments cover the period 2010 to 2011 and represent a notional amount of €17.7 million, based on the same valuation assumptions.

A 10% increase or decrease in the price of electricity (all other things being equal) would have an impact on net income of +€1.2 million and -€0.9 million, respectively.



F-92



Back to Contents



  

Notional contract amount as of

December 31, 2008 by maturity

(€ million)

 

Total

Less than
one year

1 to 5 years

More than
five years

Electricity purchase options:

in Gwh

12,854

868

3,063

8,923

 

in € million

667.5

41.9

159.5

466.1

Electricity sales commitments:

in Gwh

3,817

824

2,993

-

 

in € million

250.6

38.2

212.4

-


  

Notional contract amount as of

December 31, 2007by maturity

(€ million)

 

Total

Less than
one year

1 to 5 years

More than
five years

Electricity purchase options:

in Gwh

15,280

935

3,445

10,900

 

in € million

749.6

50.3

169.3

530.0

Electricity sales commitments:

in Gwh

3,202

1,032

2,170

-

 

in € million

177.1

55.7

121.4

-


28.3.2

Greenhouse gas emission rights

Other transactions not qualifying for hedge accounting relate to contracts swapping greenhouse gas emission rights for Carbon Emission certificates, maturing at the end of 2010, 2011 and 2012. These transactions are recorded in assets in the amount of €0.5 million and the impact on the Consolidated Income Statement is a net income of €0.8 million. 



F-93



Back to Contents


NOTE 29

Financial risk management

Group objectives and organization

The Group is exposed to the following financial risks in the course of its operating and financial activities:

Market risks, presented in Note 29.1:

-

interest-rate risk, presented in Note 29.1.1 (interest-rate fair value hedges, cash flow hedges and derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting),

-

foreign exchange risk, presented in Note 29.1.2 (hedges of a net investment in a foreign operation, hedges of balance sheet foreign exchange exposure by derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting, embedded derivatives, overall foreign exchange risk exposure),

-

commodity risk, presented in Note 29.1.3 (fuel and electricity risks, greenhouse gas emission rights).

Equity risk, presented in Note 29.2.

Liquidity risk, presented in Note 29.3

Credit risk, presented in Note 29.4

29.1

Market risk management

29.1.1

Management of interest rate risk

The financing structure of the Group exposes it naturally to the risk of interest rate fluctuations. As such, floating-rate debt impacts future financial results.

Short-term debt is primarily indexed to short-term indexes (Eonia for the treasury note program and Euribor/Libor for the main short-term credit lines). Medium and long-term debt comprises both fixed and floating-rate debt.

The Group determinesmanages a fixed/floating rate position in each currency in order to limit the impact of interest rate fluctuations on its foreign exchangenet income and to optimize the cost of debt. For this purpose, it uses interest rate swap and swaption instruments.

These swaps may be classified as fair value hedges or cash flow hedges. An interest rate fair value hedge changes fixed-rate financial assets or liabilities into floating rate financial assets or liabilities in order to protect against changes in their fair value. A cash flow hedge protects against changes in the value of cash flows associated with assets or liabilities.

The following table shows the interest-rate exposure of gross debt (defined as the sum of non-current borrowings, current borrowings and bank overdrafts and other cash position items) before and enters into hedging transactions once it has quantified its foreign exchange exposure and notably the overall foreign exchange position. Currency derivatives hedging the overall balance sheet foreign exchange position do not qualify for hedge accounting under IAS 39. The Group does not, however, consider these transactions to be of a speculative nature and views them as necessary for the effective management of its exposure to foreign exchange risk.after hedging.


Fair value

As of December 31, 2007

(€ million)

Total

USD

GBP

Other

Forward purchases

(4.2)

(4.5)

(0.1)

0.4

Currency receiver swaps

(1.8)

-

-

(1.8)

Total currency swaps and forward purchases

(6.0)

(4.5)

(0.1)

(1.4)

Forward sales

9.2

10.2

-

(1.0)

Currency payer swaps

11.5

5.1

3.2

3.2

Total currency swaps and forward sales

20.7

15.3

3.2

2.2

Call options

(0.4)

(0.4)

-

-

Put options

0.8

0.8

-

-

Total currency options

0.4

0.4

-

-

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting (*)

15.1

11.2

3.1

0.8

(*)

Net fair value (Assets–Liabilities) excluding embedded derivatives.

 

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31,2007

(€ million)

Out-
standings

% total
debt

Out-
standings

% total
debt

Out-
standings

% total
debt

Fixed rate

15,971.5

77.0%

14,055.2

69.0%

12,129.7

66.5%

Floating rate

4,770.6

23.0%

6,322.6

31.0%

6,111.0

33.5%

Gross debt before hedging

20,742.1

100.0%

20,377.8

100.0%

18,240.7

100.0%

Fixed rate

10,808.8

51.3%

9,960.8

48.0%

9,759.2

53.6%

Capped floating rate (active caps)

0.0

0.0%

36.0

0.2%

1,401.7

7.7%

Floating rate

10,276.5

48.7%

10,752.5

51.8%

7,052.1

38.7%

Gross debt after hedging and fair value remeasurement of fixed-rate debt

21,085.3

100.0%

20,749.3

100.0%

18,213.0

100.0%

Fair value adjustments to (asset)/liability hedging derivatives

(343.2)

 

(371.5)

 

27.7

 

Gross debt at amortized cost

20,742.1

 

20,377.8

 

18,240.7

 




F-93



Back to Contents



Fair value

As of December 31, 2006

(€ million)

Total

USD

GBP

Other

Forward purchases

(1.5)

(1.6)

-

0.1

Currency receiver swaps

0.7

 

-

0.7

Total currency swaps and forward purchases

(0.8)

(1.6)

-

0.8

Forward sales

0.6

0.3

-

0.3

Currency payer swaps

10.6

8.5

0.7

1.4

Total currency swaps and forward sales

11.2

8.8

0.7

1.7

Put options

-

-

-

-

Total currency options

-

-

-

-

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting (*)

10.4

7.2

0.7

2.5

(*) Net fair value (Assets–Liabilities) excluding embedded derivatives.



Fair value

As of December 31, 2005

(€ million)

Total

USD

GBP

Other

Forward purchases

(1.8)

(1.6)

-

(0.2)

Currency receiver swaps

(0.3)

0.4

-

(0.7)

Total currency swaps and forward purchases

(2.1)

(1.2)

-

(0.9)

Forward sales

(1.6)

(1.4)

-

(0.2 )

Currency payer swaps

(5.4)

(5.3)

1.5

(1.6)

Total currency swaps and forward sales

(7.0)

(6.7)

1.5

(1.8)

Put options

-

-

-

-

Total currency options

-

-

-

-

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting (*)

(9.1)

(7.9)

1.5

(2.7)

(*) Net fair value (Assets–Liabilities) excluding embedded derivatives.


The above portfolio of currency derivatives was mainly contracted by Veolia Environnement SA (holding company) to hedge its foreign currency-denominated net debt (comprising foreign currency borrowings and foreign currency-denominated inter-company loans and borrowings).


30.1.2.3

Embedded derivatives

The embedded derivatives concern Water treatment contracts with Korean industrial customers. The contracts feature clauses indexing to the euro or U.S. dollar, while the operating expenses are in Korean won.



F-94



Back to Contents


30.1.2.4Total gross debt as of December 31, 2009 after hedging was 51.3% fixed-rate and 48.7% floating-rate. No caps were active as of December 31, 2009. Excluding inactive caps, the fixed-rate portion of gross debt was 57.1% and the floating-rate portion was 42.9%.

As of December 31, 2009, the Group has cash and cash equivalents of €5,614.4 million, the majority of which bears interest at floating rates.

Net debt totals €15,127.7 million and is 69.2% fixed-rate and 30.8% floating-rate.

Sensitivity of the consolidated income statement and equity:

The Group manages its exposure to interest rate fluctuations based on floating-rate gross debt net of cash.

The breakdown of the Group’s floating-rate debt by maturity as of December 31, 2009 is as follows:

(€ million)

Overnight and
less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than
5 years

Total

Total assets (cash and cash equivalents)

5,614.4

 

 

5,614.4

Total floating-rate liabilities

(3,438.0)

(855.5)

(477.1)

(4,770.6)

Net floating-rate position before hedging

2,176.4

(855.5)

(477.1)

843.8

Derivative instruments(1)

4.2

(2,159.0)

(3,351.1)

(5,505.9)

Net floating-rate position after active management and hedging

2,180.6

(3,014.5)

(3,828.2)

(4,662.1)


(1) Debt hedging financial instruments excluding inactive caps of U.S.$400 million and €952 million.


The analysis of the sensitivity of finance costs to interest rate risk covers financial assets and liabilities and the derivative portfolio as of December 31, 2009. Given the net debt structure of the Group and its derivative portfolio, a change in interest rates would impact the income statement via the cost of floating-rate debt (after hedging), the fair value of trading derivatives and Group investments.

The analysis of the sensitivity of equity to interest rate risk concerns the cash flow hedge reserve. This sensitivity corresponds to fair market value movements as a result of an instantaneous change in interest rates.

Assuming a constant net debt structure and management policy, an increase in interest rates of 0.5% at the balance sheet date would generate an increase in equity of €25 million (before tax) and a decrease in net income (before tax) of €15 million. A decrease in interest rates of 0.5% would have the opposite impact on net income and equity. All other variables have been assumed to be constant for the purpose of this analysis and the change in net income and equity is attributable to the variation in interest rates, all other things being equal.

29.1.2

Management of foreign exchange risk

The Group’s international activities generate significant foreign currency flows.

The Group’s central treasury department manages foreign exchange risk centrally within limits set by the Chief Finance Officer.

Overall exposure to foreign exchange risk and sensitivity of the income statement and equityrisk management

The foreignForeign exchange risk, as defined in accordance with IFRS7 isIFRS 7, mainly arising from receivablesresults from:

(a)

foreign currency-denominated purchases and payables not denominated insales of goods and services relating to operating activities and the functionalrelated hedges (e.g. currency of an entity.

As a consequence, the foreign exchange exposureforwards). However, these transactions remain minor within the Group are coming from :(see Note 29.1.2.1);

(a)(b)

the loan/debt denominatedforeign currency-denominated financial assets and liabilities, including foreign currency-denominated loans/borrowings and related hedges (e.g. forex swaps) (see Note 29.1.2.2);

(c)

investments in foreign currency andsubsidiaries realized through the related derivatives instruments (currency swap for instance),translation of accounts impacting the translation reserves (see Note 29.1.2.3).

(b)

the transactions on the operating activity and the related derivatives instruments used. These transactions are limited within theF-95



Back to Contents


Management of foreign exchange transaction risk:

The Group since thehas no significant exposure to foreign exchange transaction risk. The activities of the Group are performed by subsidiaries operating in their own country and their own currency. Operating exposureExposure to foreign exchange risk is therefore naturally limited.

Management of foreign exchange asset risk:

Financing is secured in the local currency for operations located in foreign countries. In the case of inter-company financing, these credit lines can generate foreign exchange risk. In order to limit the impact of this risk, Veolia Environnement has developed a policy which seeks to back foreign-currency financing and foreign currency derivatives with inter-company receivables denominated in the same currency.

The asset exposure hedging strategy primarily involves hedging certain net foreign investments and ensuring that Group companies do not have a material balance sheet foreign exchange position that could generate significant volatility in foreign exchange gains and losses (IAS 21 / IAS 39).

29.1.2.1.

Translation risk

Considering its international presence, the translation of the income statements of the Group’s foreign subsidiaries is sensitive to exchange rate fluctuations.

The following tablestable summarizes the sensitivity of certain Group consolidated income statement aggregates to a 10% increase or decrease in foreign exchange rates against the euro, with regard to the translation of financial statements of foreign subsidiaries.

 

Contribution to the consolidated financial statements

Sensitivity to an increase or decrease in the main currencies against the euro

(€ million)

EUR

GBP

USD

PLN

CZK

Other currencies

Total

+10%

-10%

Revenue

20,677.4

2,259.3

2,977.4

502.3

1,150.6

6,984.0

34,551.0

(626.3)

689.0

Operating income

1,046.8

330.4

147.8

46.0

173.3

276.9

2,021.2

(63.4)

69.7


29.1.2.2.

Foreign exchange risk with regard to the net finance cost

With many offices worldwide, Veolia organizes financing in local currencies.

The foreign currency debts borne by the parent company, Veolia Environnement SA, are generally hedged using either derivative instruments or assets in the same currency.

The following table shows the exposure to exchange rate movements by main currency: 


(€ million)



As of December 31, 2007

EUR

USD

GBP

CNY

CZK

KRW

Other

Balance sheet position before management

(65.9)

531.2

241.5

(1.6)

(183.6)

-

946.0

Off-balance sheet position (1)

-

(588.0)

(178.9)

0,0

150.0

(131.4)

(901.7)

Position after management

(65.9)

(56.8)

62.6

(1.6)

(33.6)

(131.4)

44.3

(1)

The off-balance sheet position corresponds to the notional amount of derivative instruments set-up to hedge balance sheet exposure and embedded derivatives sensitive to foreign exchange risk.


Exposure to the euro position after management mainly corresponds to euro-denominated debt carried by a Romanian subsidiary, exposure to the USD to USD financing in countries such as China and the Middle East, exposure to the GBP to dividend payments (position hedged at the beginning of January 2008) and exposure to the KRW to the aforementioned Korean embedded derivative.

Taken into account the policyfluctuations of the Group,foreign currency net financial debt of the entities that bear the main foreign exchange risks. It also presents the sensitivity of the net incomethese entities to a change10% increase or decrease in the currency rate as of December 31, 2007 remains quite limited. An instantaneous 10% increasein the three main currencies against the euro representing the principal exposuresparities of the Group would have an impact of -€14.9 million on net income.corresponding foreign currencies.

 

Net finance cost
Foreign currency exposure
(in millions of local currency)

 

Sensitivity to an increase or decrease in the 4 main currencies against the euro
(€ million)

 

GBP

USD

PLN

CZK

Other currencies
(in euros)

Total translated into euros

+10%

-10%

Veolia Environnement SA

(37.4)

(86.0)

(54.7)

(313.1)

(356.3)

(473.9)

(15.3)

9.8

Other Group subsidiaries

(21.8)

(96.6)

(51.5)

(13.2)

(199.2)

(310.4)

(11.8)

9.7

Total in foreign currency

(59.2)

(182.7)

(106.2)

(326.3)

(555.5)

(784.3)

  

Total translated into euros

(66.2)

(125.8)

(24.5)

(12.3)

(555.5)

(784.3)

(27.1)

19.5


(€ million)


As of December 31, 2007

USD

GBP

KRW

Net income (1)

Equity

Net income (1)

Equity

Net income (1)

Equity

Impact

(7.3)

na

+6.3

na

(13.9)

na

(1)

before tax.




F-95F-96



Back to Contents


30.1.329.1.2.3.

Foreign exchange and translation risk in the consolidated statement of financial position

Due to its international presence, the Group’s consolidated statement of financial position is exposed to exchange rate fluctuations. A fluctuation in the euro impacts the translation of subsidiary foreign currency-denominated assets in the consolidated statement of financial position. The main currencies used are the US dollar and the pound sterling.

For its most significant assets, the Group has issued debt in the relevant currencies.

The following table shows the net asset amounts for the main currencies, defined as the asset amount excluding net financial debt.

 

Contribution to the consolidated financial statements

Sensitivity to an increase or decrease in the 2 main currencies against the euro

(€ million)

EUR

USD

GBP

Other currencies

Total

+10%

-10%

Assets excluding net financial debt by currency

13,044

2,710

2,646

6,859

25,259

595

(487)

Net financial debt by currency

8,506

1,595

1,857

3,170

15,128

384

(314)

Net assets by currency

4,538

1,115

789

3,689

10,131

211

(173)


29.1.3

Management of commodity risk

30.1.3.1

Fuel andor electricity risks

Fuel prices can be subject to significant fluctuations. Nonetheless, Veolia Environnement'sEnvironnement’s activities have not been materially affected and should not be materially affected in the future by cost increases or the availability of fuel or other commodities, as thecommodities. The long-term contracts entered into by Veolia Environnement generally include price review and/or indexation clauses which enable it to pass on the majority of any increases in commodity or fuel prices to the price of services sold to customers, even if this may be performed with a time delay.

AsNonetheless, as part of supply management and cost optimization, certain Group subsidiaries may be required, depending on their activities, to contract forward purchases or sales of electricity or heavy fuelcommodities and diesel swapsset-up derivatives to fix the cost of refined petroleum supplies.commodities supply, where the contracts do not offer adapted protection.

29.1.3.1.

Fuel risks

In the Transportation Division, a “fuel” hedging policy has been implemented in order to control trends in fuel prices. The accounting treatment is disclosedGroup uses firm fuel purchase contracts (deemed for its own use) or derivatives whose characteristics (notional amount, maturity) are defined in Notes 1.14 and 1.24.

Asline with forecast fuel requirements (based on firm orders or highly probably forecast flows). The majority of December 31, 2007,these derivatives are swaps used to determine the fair value of related derivative instruments totaled €60.6 million in assets and €35.6 million in liabilities and did not qualify for hedge accounting. Transactions mainly concern options toforward purchase electricity held by the company carrying the Braunschweig contract and covering the period 2007 to 2025 of €44.8 million, based on period-end valuation assumptions and commitments to sell electricity covering the period 2007 to 2011 of €15.4 million, based on the same valuation assumptions.

Contract notional amounts are as follows:


(€ million)

Notional contract amount as of

December 31, 2007 by date and maturity

Total

Less than one year

1 to 5 years

More than five years

Electricity purchase options:

in Gwh

15,280

935.2

3,445

10,900

 

in € million

749.6

50.3

169.3

530.0

Electricity sales commitments:

in Gwh

3,202

1,032

2,170

-

 

in € million

177.1

55.7

121.4

-



(€ million)

Notional contract amount as of

December 31, 2006 by date and maturity

Total

Less than one year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Electricity purchase options:

in Gwh

16,511

886

3,501

12,124

 

in € million

717.0

37.5

150.3

529.2

Electricity sales commitments:

in Gwh

 3,811

876

2,935

-

 

in € million

184.4

39.3

145.1

-


A 10% increase or decrease in the price of fuel.

These derivatives were analyzed in accordance with IAS 39 and classified as hedging instruments (cash flow hedges) (see Note 28).

29.1.3.2.

Coal, gas and electricity (all other things being equal) wouldrisks

The Group has entered into long-term gas, coal, electricity and biomass purchase contracts in order to secure its supplies.

The majority of these commitments are reciprocal; the third parties concerned are obliged to deliver the quantities indicated in these contracts and the Group is obliged to take them.

These contracts are considered to fall outside the scope of IAS 39, except for specific transactions in Germany, where electricity purchase options and sales commitments have an impact on net income of +€5 million and -€5 million, respectively.

30.1.3.2

Greenhouse gas emission rights

Other transactions not qualifying for hedge accounting relate to contracts swapping greenhouse gas emission rights for Carbon Emission certificates, maturing at the end of 2007.been contracted in parallel. These transactions are recorded in balance sheet assetsnot eligible for a net carrying amounthedging within the meaning of €8.1 million.IAS 39 (see Note 42)36 on off-balance sheet commitments).



F-96F-97



Back to Contents


30.1.429.2

Management of equity risk


As of December 31, 2007,2009, Veolia Environnement held 15,120,65414,731,592 of its own shares, of which 8,591,656 were allocated to external growth operations and 6,139,936 were acquired for allocation to employees under stock option and employee savings plans, with a market value of €944.3€340.7 million, based on a share price of €23.125 and a net carrying amount of €455.4€452.6 million deducted from equity.


As part of its cash management strategy, Veolia Environnement holds UCITS shares. These UCITS have the characteristics of monetary UCITS and are not subject to equity risk.

30.1.529.3

Management of liquidity risk

The operational management of liquidity and financing is managed by the Treasury and Financing Department. This management involves the centralization of major financing in order to optimize liquidity and cash.

The Group secures financing on international bond markets, international private placement markets, the treasury note market and the bank lending market, (see Note 17 “Non-current and current borrowings”).



F-98



Back to Contents


29.3.1

Maturity of financial liabilities

Undiscounted contractual flows of financial liabilities, comprising principal payments and interest flows, are presented below. Market data used are valid as of December 31, 2009:

 

As of December 31, 2009

Maturing in

(€ million)

Net carrying amount

Total contractual flows(1)

Less than
1 year

2 years

3 to
5 years

More than
5 years

Non-current borrowings

17,647.3

17,422.7

 

773.4

5,468.1

11,181.2

o/w bond issues – publicly offered

12,511.8

12,304.1

 

-

3,735.9

8,568.2

o/w bond issues – private placements

299.1

288.7

  

142.9

145.8

Current borrowings

2,983.1

2,983.1

2,983.1

   

Trade payables

5,311.0

5,311.0

5,311.0

   

Other current operating payables

4,933.4

4,933.4

4,933.4

   

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

454.9

454.9

454.9

   

Interest on non-current and current borrowings(2)

  

851.8

823.0

1,952.9

4,019.3

Derivative instruments – Liabilities

224.1

     

o/w interest rate derivatives

76.6

751.6

57.0

57.2

158.1

479.3

Fair value hedges

8.3

85.5

10.9

10.9

30.0

33.7

Cash flow hedges

59.6

640.8

46.0

42.1

118.8

433.9

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

8.7

25.3

0.1

4.2

9.3

11.7

o/w foreign currency derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

86.8

88.0

68.0

0.1

1.4

18.5

Inflows

 

(2,761.8)

(2,755.3)

(1.1)

(5.4)

0.0

Outflows

 

2,849.8

2,823.3

1.2

6.8

18.5

o/w foreign currency derivatives hedging a net investment

17.1

17.1

1.6

  

15.5

Inflows

 

(276.4)

(272.5)

(3.9)

  

Outflows

 

293.5

274.1

3.9

 

15.5

o/w commodity derivatives

43.6

     

Sub-total debts and liabilities

  

14,660.8

1,653.7

7,580.5

15,713.8

Derivative instruments – Assets

(477.5)

     

o/w interest rate derivatives

(355.0)

(1,173.6)

(180.8)

(180.7)

(458.4)

(353.7)

Fair value hedges

(351.5)

(1163.0)

(178.3)

(178.3)

(453.3)

(353.1)

Cash flow hedges

(0.1)

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

0.0

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

(3.5)

(10.6)

(2.5)

(2.4)

(5.1)

(0.6)

o/w foreign currency derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

(45.5)

(42.8)

(26.5)

(3.4)

(8.9)

(4.0)

Inflows

 

(1,182.4)

(995.4)

(53.3)

(102.9)

(30.8)

Outflows

 

1,139.6

968.9

49.9

94.0

26.8

o/w foreign currency derivatives hedging a net investment

(13.1)

(13.1)

(3.0)

  

(10.1)

Inflows

 

(185.1)

(175.0)

  

(10.1)

Outflows

 

172.0

172.0

   

o/w commodity derivatives

(63.9)

     

Sub-total assets

  

(210.3)

(184.1)

(467.3)

(367.8)

Total

  

14,450.5

1,469.6

7,113.2

15,346.0

(1)

debts are presented at the year-end exchange rate

(2)

floating-rate interest is calculated at the year-end interest rate


The average maturity of financial debt is 10 years.



F-99



Back to Contents


29.3.2

Net liquid asset positions

Net liquid assets of the Group as of December 31, 2009 break down as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31,2008

As of
December 31,2007

Veolia Environnement:

   

Undrawn MT syndicated loans *

3,694.6

2,890.3

4,000.0

Undrawn MT credit lines

400.0

575.0

850.0

Undrawn ST credit lines

575.0

350.0

175.0

Cash & cash equivalents

4,091.2

2,283.6

1,550.8

Subsidiaries:

  

 

Cash & cash equivalents

1,523.2

1,566.0

1,564.8

Total liquid assets

10,284.0

7,664.9

8,140.6

Current debts and bank overdrafts and other cash position items

  

 

Current debts

2,983.1

3,219.7

3,805.0

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

454.9

465.7

459.4

Total current debts and bank overdrafts and other cash position items

3,438.0

3,685.4

4,264.4

Total liquid assets net of current debts and bank overdrafts and cash position items

6,846.0

3,979.5

3,876.2


* maturing April 20, 2012.


As of December 31, 2009, Veolia Environnement had total liquid assets of €10.3 billion, including cash and cash equivalents of €5.6 billion.

As of December 31, 2009, cash equivalents were primarily held by Veolia Environnement SA in the amount of €4,049.8 million including non-dynamic monetary UCITS of €3,037.9 million, negotiable debt instruments (bank certificates of deposit and treasury notes with a maturity of less than three months) of €375.2 million, monetary notes of €385.0 million and term deposits of €250.0 million.

Undrawn credit lines as of December 31, 2009 are as follows:

Bank

Amount in € million

Maturity

NATIXIS

150

March 31, 2012

BNP Paribas

150

March 2, 2012

HSBC

100

June 30, 2011

RBS formerly ABN

100

December 29, 2010

SG

150

December 23, 2010

ABN Amro

125

December 20, 2010

CIC and BFCM

100

November 15, 2010

Calyon

100

March 4, 2010

Total

975


The €150 million credit line with BNP Paribas which matured on March 3, 2009 was renewed in the same amount, with a new maturity of March 2, 2012.

The €200 million credit line with Natixis which matured on February 9, 2009 was renewed in the amount of €150 million, with a new maturity of March 31, 2012.

A new credit line of €100 million was negotiated with HSBC, with a maturity of June 30, 2011.

Veolia Environnement may draw on the multi-currency syndicated credit facility and all credit lines at any time.



F-100



Back to Contents


29.3.3

Rating

As of December 31, 2009, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s rated Veolia Environnement SA as follows:

Short-term

Long-term

Outlook

Recent events

Moody’s

P-2

A3

Negative

On March 26, 2009, Moody’s confirmed the ratings assigned to Veolia Environnement on June 27, 2005, but downgraded the outlook from stable to negative.

Standard and Poor’s

A-2

BBB+

Negative

On March 25, 2009, Standard and Poor’s confirmed the ratings assigned to Veolia Environnement on October 3, 2005, but downgraded the outlook from stable to negative. On January 4, 2010, these ratings were confirmed by Standard and Poor’s.


29.3.4

Information on early debt repayment clauses

Debt of Veolia Environnement SA:

Bank financing:

The legal documentation for syndicated loans (particularly the syndicated loan of €4 billion) and bilateral credit lines contracted by Veolia Environnement SA does not contain any financial covenants, i.e. obligations to comply with a debt payout ratio or interest ratio or a minimum credit rating which, in the event of non-compliance, could lead to the early repayment of the relevant financing.

Bond financing:

The private placement performed in the United States in 2003 (outstanding of €299.1 million as of December 31, 2009) is the only source of bond financing that contains financial covenants (debt hedging ratio < 5.3 and interest hedging ratio > 3.2). These covenants were complied with as of December 31, 2009

The legal documentation for the notes issued by the Company under its EMTN program (outstanding of €11.2 billion as of December 31, 2009) does not contain any financial covenants.

Debt of subsidiaries:

The project financing borne by specific companies or the financing granted by multilateral development banks to the Group’s subsidiaries may contain financial covenants.

As of December 31, 2009, the financing agreements containing such covenants and amounting to more than €100 million (Group share) were as follows:

Financing
(€ million)

Outstanding as of December 31, 2009

Type of covenant

Aquiris (Water Division - Belgium)

179.1

DPR1 and deadline for obtaining final acceptance for the plant

Delfluent (Water Division – Netherlands)

112.4

DPR, forecast DPR and duration of financing

Shenzhen (Water Division – China)

100.9

Minimum reserve account

Redal (Water Division - Morocco)

103.6

Working capital, equity/share capital and DPR


DPR (Debt Payout Ratio) = Net financial debt ratio/EBITDA for which the defined aggregates may vary according to the financing




F-101



Back to Contents


As of December 31, 2009, the Group complied with all the covenants included in the documentation of these significant financing agreements.

With regard to the Aquiris project (Brussels wastewater treatment plant), the lenders waived their right as of January 29, 2010 to demand early repayment of the financing until June 30, 2010. At the same time, a demand guarantee, exercisable as of June 30, 2010 and maturing on August 31, 2010, was granted by Veolia Eau-CGE to the lenders.

Financing for a project with an outstanding of €81 million as of December 31, 2009 contains a covenant that has yet to be complied with.

29.4

Management of credit risk

The Group is exposed to counterparty risk in various areas: its operating activities, cash investment activities and derivatives.

29.4.1

Counterparty risk relating to operating activities

Credit risk must be considered separately with respect to operating financial assets and operating receivables. Credit risk on operating financial assets is appraised via the rating of primarily public customers. Credit risk on other operating receivables is appraised through an analysis of risk dilution and late payments for private customers and exceptionally, for public customers, by a credit analysis.

Group customer credit risk analysis may be broken down into the following four categories (Public customers - Delegating authority, Private customers - Individuals, Public customers - Other and Private customers - Companies):

  

As of December 31, 2009

Breakdown by customer type

(€ million)

Note

Gross
carrying
amount

Provisions

Net carrying
amount

Public
customers -
Delegating
authority

Private
customers -
Individuals

Public
customers -
Other

Private
customers -
Companies

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,705.0

(53.2)

5,651.8

4,647.3

 

185.6

818.9

Trade receivables

13

9,641.6

(560.3)

9,081.3

2,202.8

1,685.8

1,672.9

3,519.8

Other current operating receivables

13

1,178.0

(76.8)

1,101.2

183.3

318.6

88.3

511.0

Other non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

774.8

(73.5)

701.3

59.0

4.1

19.3

618.9(1)

Current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

195.8

(31.9)

163.9

27.9

5.1

3.8

127.1

Loans and receivables

 

17,495.2

(795.7)

16,699.5

7,120.3

2,013.6

1,969.9

5,595.7

Other non-current financial assets

11

72.8

(20.2)

52.6

3.1

7.1

18.2

24.2

Other current financial assets

11

57.9

(4.1)

53.8

1.9

4.1

0.3

47.5

Total

 

17,625.9

(820.0)

16,805.9

7,125.3

2,024.8

1,988.4

5,667.4



1

Of which Dalkia International and its subsidiaries in the amount of €434.2 million as of December 31, 2008 and €390.8 million as of December 31, 2009.



F-102



Back to Contents


The analysis of Group customer credit risk as of December 31, 2008 is as follows:

  

As of December 31, 2008

Breakdown by customer type

(€ million)

Note

Gross
carrying
amount

Provisions

Net carrying
amount

Public
customers -
Delegating
authority

Private
customers -
Individuals

Public
customers -
Other

Private
customers -
Companies

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,763.8 

(12.6)

5,751.2 

4,834.9

-

54.0

862.3

Trade receivables

13

10,253.0 

(550.9)

9,702.1 

2,228.2

1,877.2

1,776.1

3,820.6

Other current operating receivables

13

1,314.1 

(59.6)

1,254.5 

244.3

312.9

153.1

544.2

Other non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

803.0 

(63.4) 

739.6 

59.9

21.8

28.9

629.0(1)

Current financial assets in loans and receivables

14

283.3 

(27.9) 

255.4 

29.4

4.7

28.6

192.7

Loans and receivables

 

18,417.2 

(714.4) 

17,702.8 

7,396.7

2,216.6

2,040.7

6,048.8

Other non-current financial assets

11

91.5 

(13.8) 

77.7 

23.3

8.1

17.6

28.7

Other current financial assets

14

70.2 

(4.2) 

66.0 

2.0

3.9

26.0

34.1


Given the nature of the Group’s activities and its customers, and notably the ongoing nature of its activities, the Group considers that credit risk is unlikely to have a material impact.



1

Of which Dalkia International and its subsidiaries in the amount of €434.2 million as of December 31, 2008 and €390.8 million as of December 31, 2009.



F-103



Back to Contents


Assets past due and not impaired break down as follows:

  

As of December 31, 2009

Assets past due but not impaired

  

Gross
carrying
amount

Provisions

Net carrying
amount

Assets not
yet due

(€ million)

Note

0-6
months

6 months -
1 year

More
than
1 year

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,705.0

(53.2)

5,651.8

5,623.7

13.7

7.4

7.0

Trade receivables

13

9,941.6

(560.3)

9,081.3

6,765.4

1,631.7

267.3

416.9

Other current operating receivables

13

1,178.0

(76.8)

1,101.2

747.2

87.3

171.3

95.4

Other non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

774.8

(73.5)

701.3

701.3

   

Current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

195.8

(31.9)

163.9

136.4

10.8

5.6

11.1

Loans and receivables

 

17,495.2

(795.7)

16,699.5

13,974.0

1,743.5

451.6

530.4

Other non-current financial assets

11

72.8

(20.2)

52.6

52.6

   

Other current financial assets

11

57.9

(4.1)

53.8

48.2

 

1.9

3.7


Assets past due over 6 months and not impaired (€987.6 million) mainly consist of trade receivables. They declined by 11.2% compared to fiscal 2008.

Payment delays in excess of 6 months are mainly concentrated in two countries where settlement periods are exceptionally long:

In Italy, the net “trade receivables” account for all Group subsidiaries is €247.2 million as of December 31, 2009, for receivables past due over 6 months. This period is due to settlement practices in this country. Furthermore, in Italy, trade receivables primarily consist of a multitude of user/private customers for which the credit risk is highly diluted and local authorities and state bodies for which the recovery period is long.

In Morocco, the net “trade receivables” account is €39.6 million as of December 31, 2009, compared to €73.3 million as of December 31, 2008, for receivables past due over 6 months. This decrease was mainly attributable to the change in consolidated method (from full to proportionate consolidation) for the Water division’s activity in North Africa and the Middle East.

Finally, in France, net trade receivables past due over 6 months total €196.7 million at the end of 2009 (€262.1 million at the end of 2008) representing 4.2% of customer outstandings (including €109.8 million past due over one year), the majority of which concern amounts invoiced on behalf of local authorities and public bodies, receivables on local authorities and public bodies and VAT.



F-104



Back to Contents


Financial assets maturity schedule as of December 31, 2008.

  

As of December 31,2008

Assets past due but not impaired

  

Gross carrying amount

Provisions

Net carrying amount

Assets not yet due

(€ million)

Note

0-6 months

6 months - 1 year

More than 1 year

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,763.8 

(12.6) 

5,751.2 

5,738.4

7.2

5.6

-

Trade receivables

13

10,253.0 

(550.9) 

9,702.1 

6,649.7

2,258.2

387.4

406.8

Other current operating receivables

13

1,314.1 

(59.6) 

1,254.5 

819.5

162.5

162.1

110.4

Other non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

803.0 

(63.4)

739.6 

739.6

 -

 -

 -

Current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

283.3 

(27.9) 

255.4 

188.6

45.2

12.3

9.3

Loans and receivables

 

18,417.2 

(714.4) 

17,702.8 

14,135.8

2,473.1

567.4

526.5

Other non-current financial assets

11

91.5 

(13.8) 

77.7 

77.7

 -

 -

 -

Other current financial assets

11

70.2 

(4.2) 

66.0 

17.7

30.5

3.9

13.9


Financial assets maturity schedule as of December 31, 2007:

  

As of December 31, 2007

Assets past due but not impaired

  

Gross carrying amount

Provisions

Net carrying amount

Assets not yet due

(€ million)

Note

0-6 months

6 months - 1 year

More than 1 year

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,633.6

(6.0)

5,627.6

5,624.4

2.5

0.7

-

Trade receivables

13

9,813.7

(510.0)

9,303.7

6,335.5

2,305.0

309.7

353.5

Other current operating receivables

13

1,508.1

(75.1)

1,433.0

784.0

451.5

134.1

63.4

Other non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

572.6

(57.6)

515.0

515.0

-

-

-

Current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

174.1

(21.3)

152.8

123.3

15.7

6.2

7.6

Loans and receivables

 

17,702.1

(670.0)

17,032.1

13,382.2

2,774.7

450.7

424.5

Other non-current financial assets

11

231.0

-

231.0

231.0

-

-

-

Other current financial assets

11

177.2

-

177.2

177.2

-

-

-


29.4.2

Counterparty risk relating to investment and hedging activities

The Group is exposed to credit risk relating to the investment of its surplus cash and its use of derivative instruments in order to manage interest rate and currency risk. Credit risk corresponds to the loss that the Group may incur should a counterparty default on its contractual obligations. In the case of derivative financial instruments, this risk corresponds to the fair value of all the instruments contracted with a counterparty insofar as this value is positive.

The Group minimizes counterparty risk through internal control procedures limiting the choice of counterparties to leading banks and financial institutions (banks and financial institutions with a minimum Moody’s, Standard & Poor'sPoor’s or Fitch'sFitch’s rating of A1/P1/F1 respectively for transactions with a term of less than one year and of A2/A/A respectively for transactions with a term of more than one year). Limits are determined for each counterparty based primarily on the rating awarded by the rating agencies.agencies and the size of their equity, and are reviewed monthly. In addition, derivative transactions are only entered into with counterparties with whom the Group has an ISDA or FBF framework agreement.



F-105



Back to Contents


Deposit counterparty risk is managed by the Treasury and Financing Department which centralizes the cash positions of Group entities. In this way, the counterparty risk of entities is limited to settlement and account keeping banking activities, signature commitments and the continuation of credit lines obtained from banks with the authorization of the Group Treasury and Financing Department.

Counterparty risk on financial transactions is monitored on an ongoing basis by the back-office.middle-office. The Group is not exposed to any risk as a result of material concentration.

30.2

ManagementAs of liquidityDecember 31, 2009, Veolia Environnement SA’s total outstandings exposed to credit risk

The operational management of liquidity amounted to €4,049.8 million with regard to investments and short-term financing is managed by the Treasury and Financing Department.

Similarly, new financing is secured and managed centrally in order€272 million with regard to optimize liquidity.

The Group secures financing on the bank lending market, the treasury note market, international bond markets and international private placement markets.

The Treasury and Financing Department ensures the liquidityderivative instruments (sum of the Group at all times, while taking into account the general conditionsfair values of assets and liabilities). These counterparties are investment grade for up to 97% of the market. A liquidity report is prepared monthly and reviewed by Executive Management.total exposure.



F-97



Back to Contents


The following table presents undiscounted contractual flows of financial liabilities, comprising principal payments and interest flows. Market data used are validVeolia Environnement SA cash surpluses (€4.05 billion as of December 31, 2007:

(€ million)




As of December 31, 2007

Maturing in

Net carrying amount

Total contractual flows

(1)

Less than 1 year

2 years

3 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Long-term borrowings

13,948.0

13,842.0

-

637.6

3,124.3

10,080.1

o/w bond issues – publicly offered

 

8,331.4

-

43.1

1,022.5

7,265.8

o/w bond issues – private placements

 

285.1

-

-

-

285.1

Short-term borrowings

3,805.0

3,805.0

3,805.0

 

 

 

Trade payables

5,343.8

5,343.8

5,343.8

 

 

 

Other current operating payables

5,009.4

5,009.4

5,009.4

 

 

 

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

459.4

459.4

459.4

 

 

 

Interest on long- and short-term borrowings(2)

 

 

715.5

663.7

1,750.4

3,983.0

Derivative instruments - Liabilities

      

o/w interest rate derivatives

113.0

343.9

46.7

45.4

112.5

139.3

Fair value hedge

48.9

135.0

21.9

21.9

58.8

32.4

Cash flow hedge

41.0

80.6

5.5

5.1

14.2

55.8

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

23.1

128.3

19.3

18.4

39.5

51.1

o/w foreign exchange derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

35.6

11.2

8.8

1.0

1.4

-

Inflows

 

(1,160.6)

(1,128.4)

(26.8)

(5.4)

 

Outflows

 

1,171.8

1,137.2

27.8

6.8

 

o/w foreign exchange derivatives hedging a net investment

13.6

1.0

1.0

-

-

-

Inflows

 

(354.4)

(354.4)

-

-

-

Outflows

 

355.4

355.4

-

-

-

o/w commodity derivatives

35.6

-

-

-

-

-

Inflows

 

-

 

 

 

 

Outflows

 

-

 

 

 

 

Sub-total debts and liabilities

  

15,389.6

1,347.7

4,988.6

14,202.4




F-98



Back to Contents



(€ million)




As of December 31, 2007

Maturing in

Net carrying amount

Total contractual flows

(1)

Less than 1 year

2 years

3 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Derivative instruments - Assets

      

o/w interest rate derivatives

(71.1)

(89.8)

(15.6)

(11.2)

(24.7)

(38.3)

Fair value hedge

(21.2)

(43.8)

(5.0)

(4.3)

(12.8)

(21.7)

Cash flow hedge

(11.8)

(19.4)

(5.6)

(4.6)

(5.0)

(4.2)

Derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

(38.1)

(26.6)

(5.0)

(2.3)

(6.9)

(12.4)

o/w foreign exchange derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting

(26.9)

(28.7)

(19.4)

(7.0)

(2.3)

-

Inflows

 

(1,745.9)

(1,586.5)

(102.7)

(56.7)

-

Outflows

 

1,717.2

1,567.1

95.7

54.4

 

o/w foreign exchange derivatives hedging a net investment

(78.3)

(70.3)

(70.3)

-

-

-

Inflows

 

(926.8)

(926.8)

-

-

-

Outflows

 

856.5

856.5

-

-

-

o/w commodity derivatives

(61.8)

-

-

-

-

-

Inflows

 

-

    

Outflows

 

-

    

Sub-total assets

  

(105.3)

(18.2)

(27.0)

(38.3)

Total

  

15,284.3

1,329.5

4,961.6

14,164.1

(1)

debts are presented at the year-end exchange rate

(2)

floating-rate interest is calculated at the year-end interest rate




F-99



Back to Contents


Liquid assets of the Group as of December 31, 2007 break down as follows:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Veolia Environnement:

   

Undrawn MT syndicated loans *

4,000.0

4,000.0

4,069.0

Undrawn MT credit lines

850.0

925.0

725.0

Undrawn ST credit lines

175.0

150.0

250.0

Other financial assets (marketable securities)

-

17.6

-

Cash & cash equivalents

1,550.8

1,140.5

953.6

Subsidiaries:

 

 

 

Other financial assets (marketable securities)

-

48.9

60.7

Cash & cash equivalents

1,564.8

1,517.5

1,382.5

Total

8,140.6

7,799.5

7,440.8

*

maturing April 20, 2012


As of December 31, 2007, Veolia Environnement had total liquidities of €8.1 billion, including cash and cash equivalents of €3.1 billion.

Veolia Environnement cash surpluses (€1,551 million)2009) are managed with a profitability objective close to that of the monetarymoney market and avoiding exposure to capital risk and maintaining a low level of volatility. Investment supports primarily comprise

They were injected into the following types of investment:

non-dynamic monetary UCITS (with the AMF Euro Monetary classification) for €3,038 million,

certificates of deposit and term deposits with a maturity of less than three months with leading French banks with a rating from Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s or Fitch: A1+/P1/F1 in the short term for €350 million,

negotiable debt instruments (certificates of deposit, etc.) and equivalents.

In 2007, the Group continued its policy of optimizing the cost andsecurities with a maturity of its liquidities. The bilateral credit lines available to VE SAless than three months issued by CAC40 or Eurostoxx 50 companies for €275 million,

monetary notes issued by leading French banks with a rating from Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s or Fitch: A1+/P1/F1 in 2007 included a credit line signed with Ixis (€100 million) and a credit line granted by Natexis (€150 million). When this line arrived at maturity (November 29, 2007), it was decided to group these two bilateral credit lines within a single credit line given the merger of these two institutions. The new financing facility of €200 million was granted by Natixis and matures February 9, 2009.

The syndicated credit documentation and bilateral credit lines do not contain any events of default tied to restrictive financial covenants (such as debt payout ratios or interest coverage ratios).short term for €385 million.

30.3

Management of credit risk

Credit risk results from the potential inability of customers to respect their payment obligations.

Given the nature of the Group’s activities and its customers, the Group considers that credit risk is unlikely to have a material impact.

Approximately 30% of customer outstandings currently concern public counterparties (delegating authority and public customers (excluding subscribers)), with whom credit risk is limited to the settlement period.

Furthermore, 29% of customer outstandings concern subscribers (water, heat networks etc.), including local authorities for approximately €1.7 billion (18% of customer outstandings), for whom recovery rates are high given the ongoing nature of services.

Maximum Group exposure is considered to be equal to the nominal value of financial assets, net of any impairment losses.




F-100



Back to Contents


Financial assets maturity schedule


(€ million)





Note

As of December 31, 2007


Assets overdue but not impaired

 Gross carrying amount

Provisions

Net carrying amount

Assets not yet due

0-6 months

6 months - 1 year

More than 1 year

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,633.6

(6.0)

5,627.6

5,624.4

2.5

0.7

-

Trade receivables

13

9,813.7

(510.0)

9,303.7

6,005.9

2,179.3

772.7

345.8

Other current operating receivables

13

1,508.1

(75.1)

1,433.0

784.0

451.5

134.1

63.4

Other non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

572.6

(57.6)

515.0

515.0

-

-

-

Current financial assets in loans and receivables

14

174.1

(21.3)

152.8

123.3

15.7

6.2

7.6

Loans and receivables

 

17,702.1

(670.0)

17,032.1

13,052.6

2,649.0

913.7

416.8

Other non-current financial assets

11

231.0

-

231.0

231.0

-

-

-

Other current financial assets

14

177.2

-

177.2

177.2

-

-

-


Assets overdue by 6 months and not impaired (€1,330.5 million) mainly consist of trade receivables (€1,118.5 million in 2007).

Payment delays in excess of 6 months are mainly concentrated in two countries where settlement periods are exceptionally long:

In Italy, the net “trade receivables” account for all Group subsidiaries is €677 million as of December 31, 2007, for receivables past due over 6 months. This period is due to settlement practices in this country. Furthermore, in Italy, trade receivables primarily consist of a multitude of user/private customers for which the credit risk is highly diluted and local authorities for which the recovery period is long.

In Morocco, the net “trade receivables” account is €88 million as of December 31, 2007, for receivables overdue by 6 months. Recovery action plans have been implemented with local authorities and state bodies who comprise the majority of debtors.

Finally, in France, net trade receivables overdue by 6 months total €189.6 million at the end of 2007, representing 3.75% of customer outstandings (including €89.2 million overdue by one year), the majority of which concern amounts invoiced on behalf of local authorities and public bodies and VAT.




F-101



Back to Contents


Financial assets maturity schedule as of December 31, 2006:


(€ million)





Note

As of December 31, 2006


Assets overdue but not impaired

Gross carrying amount

Provisions

Net carrying amount

Assets not yet due

0-6 months

6 months - 1 year

More than 1 year

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,465.6

(6.0)

5,459.6

5,454.7

0.8

4.1

-

Trade receivables

13

8,939.3

(448.7)

8,490.6

5,626.0

1,764.6

802.3

297.7

Other current operating receivables

13

1,383.9

(121.7)

1,262.2

720.9

295.5

117.9

127.9

Other non-current financial assets in loans and receivables

11

604.8

(58.8)

546.0

546.0

-

-

-

Current financial assets in loans and receivables

14

363.3

(158.0)

205.3

118.9

79.7

4.0

2.7

Loans and receivables

 

16,756.9

(793.2)

15,963.7

12,466.5

2,140.6

928.3

428.3

Other non-current financial assets

11

91.5

-

91.5

91.5

-

-

-

Other current financial assets

14

66.4

-

66.4

57.8

8.6

-

-






F-102



Back to Contents


NOTE 31.30

Additional information on financial assets and liabilities

Fair value measurement principles are presented in Note 1.27.

Financial assets

The following schedules present the net carrying amount and fair value of Group financial assets as of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005:

(€ million)




Note

As of December 31, 2007

Net carrying amount per IAS 39 category

Fair value

Total

Available-for-sale assets

Loans and receivables

Assets designated at fair value through profit and loss

Total

Available-for-sale assets

Loans and receivables

Assets designated at fair value through profit and loss

Non-consolidated investments

9


256.1


256.1


-


-


256.1


256.1


-


-

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10


5,627.6


-


5,627.6


-


5,666.2


-


5,666.2


-

Other non-current financial assets

11

746.0

231.0

515.0

-

746.0

231.0

515.0

-

Trade receivables

13

9,303.7

-

9,303.7

-

9,303.7

-

9,303.7

-

Other current operating receivables

13

1,433.0

-

1,433.0

-

1,433.0

-

1,433.0

-

Other current financial assets

14

330.0

177.2

152.8

-

330.0

177.2

152.8

-

Cash & cash equivalents

15


3,115.6


-


-


3,115.6


3,115.6


-


-


3,115.6

Total

 

20,812.0

664.3

17,032.1

3,115.6

20,850.6

664.3

17,070.7

3,115.6




F-103



Back to Contents



(€ million)




Note

As of December 31, 2006

Net carrying amount per IAS 39 category

Total

Held-to- maturity assets

Available-for-sale assets

Loans and receivables

Assets designated at fair value through profit and loss

Assets at fair value through profit and loss and held for trading

Non-consolidated investments

9

181.7

 -

181.7

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,459.6

 -

5,459.6

 -

 -

Other non-current financial assets

11

637.5

 -

91.5

546.0

 -

 -

Trade receivables

13

8,490.6

 -

 -

8,490.6

 -

 -

Other current operating receivables

13

1,262.2

 -

 -

1,262.2

  

Other current financial assets

14

271.7

 -

66.4

205.3

 -

 -

Cash & cash equivalents

15

2,658.0

 -

2,658.0

-

Total

 

18,961,4

-

339,6

15,963,8

2,658.0

-


(€ million)




Note

As of December 31, 2005

Net carrying amount per IAS 39 category

Total

Held-to- maturity assets

Available-for-sale assets

Loans and receivables

Assets designated at fair value through profit and loss

Assets at fair value through profit and loss and held for trading

Non-consolidated investments

9

209.5

-

209.5

-

-

-

Non-current and current operating financial assets

10

5,545.4

-

-

5,545.4

-

-

Other non-current financial assets

11

691.6

-

252.1

439.5

-

-

Trade receivables

13

8,006.5

  

8,006.5

  

Other current operating receivables

13

1,151.9

-

-

1,151.9

-

-

Other current financial assets

14

281.9

-

60.7

221.2

-

-

Cash & cash equivalents

15

2,336.1

-

-

-

2,336.1

-

Total

 

18,222.9

-

522.3

15,364.5

2,336.1

-



F-104



Back to Contents


Financial liabilities

The following tables schedule present the net carrying amount and fair value of Group financial liabilities as of December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005:

(€ million)






Note

As of December 31, 2007

Net carrying amount per IAS 39 category

Fair value

Total

Liabilities at amortized cost

Liabilities designated  at fair value through profit and loss

Liabilities at fair value through profit and loss and held for trading

Total

Liabilities at amortized cost

Liabilities designated at fair value through profit and loss

Liabilities at fair value through profit and loss and held for trading

Borrowings and other financial liabilities

         

- long-term bonds

18

9,009.6

9,009.6

-

-

8,747.8

8,747.8

-

-

- other long-term borrowings

18

4,938.4

4,938.4

-

-

4,761.6

4,761.6

-

-

- short-term borrowings

19

3,805.0

3,805.0

-

-

3,805.0

3,805.0

-

-

- bank overdrafts and other cash position items

20

459.4

459.4

-

-

459.4

459.4

-

-

Other non-current debt

17

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Trade payables

13

5,343.8

5,343.8

  

5,343.8

5,343.8

-

-

Other operating payables

13

5,009.4

5,009.4

-

-

5,009.4

5,009.4

  

Total

 

28,565.6

28,565.6

-

-

28,127.0

28,127.0

-

-




F-105



Back to Contents



(€ million)






Note

As of December 31, 2006

Net carrying amount per IAS 39 category

Fair value

Total

Liabilities at amortized cost

Liabilities designated at fair value through profit and loss

Liabilities  at fair value through profit and loss and held for trading

Total

Liabilities at amortized cost

Liabilities designated at fair value through profit and loss

Liabilities  at fair value through profit and loss and held for trading

Borrowings and other financial liabilities

         

- long-term bonds

18

8,417.5

8,417.5

-

-

8,635.6

8,635.6

-

-

- other long-term borrowings

18

5,584.1

5,584.1

-

-

5,640.4

5,640.4

-

-

- short-term borrowings

19

2,904.1

2,904.1

-

-

2,904.1

2,904.1

-

-

- bank overdrafts and other cash position items

20

456.0

456.0

-

-

456.0

456.0

-

-

Other non-current debt

17

207.3

207.3

-

-

207.3

207.3

-

-

Trade payables

13

4,776.0

4,776.0

  

4,776.0

4,776.0

  

Other operating payables

13

4,445.6

4,445.6

-

-

4,445.6

4,445.6

-

-

Total

 

26,790.7

26,790.7

-

-

27,065.1

27,065.1

-

-




F-106



Back to Contents



(€ million)






Note

As of December 31,2005

Net carrying amount per IAS 39 category

Fair value

Total

Liabilities at amortized cost

Liabilities designated at fair value through profit and loss

Liabilities  at fair value through profit and loss and held for trading

Total

Liabilities at amortized cost

Liabilities designated at fair value through profit and loss

Liabilities  at fair value through profit and loss and held for trading

Borrowings and other financial liabilities

         

- non current bonds

18

7,857.9

7,857.9

-

-

8,333.0

8,333.0

-

-

- other long-term borrowings

18

5,864.9

5,864.9

-

-

5,985.7

5,985.7

-

-

- short-term borrowings

19

2,138.2

2,138.2

-

-

2,138.2

2,138.2

-

-

- bank overdrafts and other cash position items

20

506.8

506.8

-

-

506.8

506.8

-

-

Other non-current debt

17

203.7

203.7

-

-

203.7

203.7

-

-

Trade payables

13

4,576.3

4,576.3

  

4,576.3

4,576.3

  

Other operating payables

13

4,016.4

4,016.4

-

-

4,016.4

4,016.4

-

-

Total

 

26,941.3

26,941.3

-

-

27,537.2

27,537.2

-

-




F-107



Back to Contents


NOTE 32.

Employee benefit obligation

Share-based compensation

Veolia Environnement share purchase and subscription option plans

Veolia Environnement has implemented several standard fixed share purchase and subscription option plans, as well as a variable plan for management. The only share purchase plan was created on June 23, 2000.

Outstanding option plans at the end of 20072009 were as follows:

 

N°7

N°6

N°5

N°4

N°3

N°2

 

2007

2006

2004

2003

2002

2001

Grant date

07/17/2007

03/28/2006

12/24/2004

03/24/2003

01/28/2002

02/08/2001

Number of options granted

2,490,400

4,044,900

3,341,600

5,192,635

4,413,000

3,462,000

Number of options not exercised

635,850 (*)

3,709,861

3,080,738

1,571,010

1,929,114

0

Plan term

8 years

8 years

8 years

8 years

8 years

8 years

Vesting conditions

4 years service plus performance conditions to be satisfied

4 years service

3 years service plus performance conditions for certain plans

3 years service

3 years service

3 years service

Vesting method

After 4 years

After 4 years

By tranches of 1/3 over 3 years

By tranches of 1/3 over 3 years

By tranches of 1/3 over 3 years

After 3 years

Strike price
(in euros)

57.05

44.03**

24.32**

22.14**

36.65**

40.59**


*

Given the performance criteria, the number of options effectively exercisable has been reduced from 1,742,650 in 2008.

**

Strike price adjusted to take account of transactions impacting the share capital of the Company (issue of share subscription warrants on December 17, 2001 and share capital increases with retention of preferential subscription rights on August 2, 2002 and July 10, 2008). To recap, the initial strike prices for plans no. 2, no. 3, no. 4, no. 5 and no. 6 were €42.00, €37.53, €22.50, €24.72 and €44.75 respectively.


 

N°7

N°6

N°5

N°4

N°3

N°2

N°1

 

2007

2006

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

Grant date


07/17/2007


03/28/2006


12/24/2004


03/24/2003


01/28/2002


02/08/2001


06/23/2000

Number of options granted


2,490,400


4,044,900


3,341,600


5,192,635


4,413,000


3,462,000


780,000

Number of options not exercised

2,473,900

4,002,884

3,294,066

1,950,414

2,045,292

1,520,588

134,029 *

Plan term

8 years

8 years

8 years

8 years

8 years

8 years

8 years

Vesting conditions


4 years service plus performance conditions to be satisfied

4 years service

3 years service plus performance conditions for certain plans

3 years service

3 years service

3 years service

3 years service plus performance conditions to be satisfied

Purchase terms

After 4 years

After 4 years

By tranches of 1/3 over 3 years

By tranches of 1/3 over 3 years

By tranches of 1/3 over 3 years

After 3 years

After 3 years

Strike price (in euros)


57.05


44.03**

24.32**

22.14**

36.65**

40.59**

31.41**

*

Given the performance criteria, the number of options effectively exercisable has been reduced.

**

Strike price adjusted to take account of transactions impacting the share capital of the Company (issue of share subscription warrants on December 17, 2001 and share capital increases with retention of preferential subscription rights on August 2, 2002 and July 10, 2007). The initial strike prices for plans n°1, n°2, n°3, n°4, n°5 and n°6 were €32.50, €42.00, €37.53, €22.50, €24.72 and €44.75 respectively.




F-108F-106



Back to Contents


2008 and 2009:

The Group did not grant any share options in 2008 or 2009.

2007:

In 2007, the Group granted 2,490,400 share options to two employee groups. The first group comprises Veolia Environnement Group management, including members of the Executive Committee. The second group comprises senior managers of Veolia Environnement Group companies and employees recognized for their excellent performance in 2006. The estimated fair value of each option granted in 2007 was €13,91. This value was calculated using the Black and Scholes method, is €13.91. The assumptionsmodel based on the following underlying this model are as follows:assumptions: share price of €57.26, historical volatility of 21.75 %,21.75%, expected dividend yield of 2%, risk-free interest rate of 4.59 %,4.59%, estimated exercise maturity of 6 years.

In 2007, the Group granted 333,700 Free Shares to employees recognized for their excellent performance in 2006. In France, rights vest after two years, followed by a two-yeartwo year lock-in period and are subject to performance conditions. Outside France, rights vest after four years subject to performance conditions. The estimated fair value of each free share granted in 2007 iswas €57.26, net of dividends not received during the vesting period and, for shares granted to French employees, a discount for non-transferability.

Finally, in 2007, the Group granted 205,200 Stock Appreciation Rights (SAR) to ordinary shares to three groups of employees: firstly, Veolia Environnement Group management, secondly senior managers of Veolia Environnement Group companies and thirdly employees recognized for their excellent performance in 2006. Rights vest after four years subject to performance conditions. TheAs of December 31, 2009, the estimated fair value of each option granted in December 31, 2007 is €14.96.€0.195. This value was calculated using the Black and Scholes model based on the following underlying assumptions: share price of €61.44,€22.52, historical volatility of 21.66%33.24%, expected dividend yield of 2%5.35%, risk-free interest rate of 4.11%1.99%, estimated exercise maturity of 53 years, subscription price of €57.20.

The number of options granted under the three 2007 plans (share options, free shares and SAR) iswas determined based on the increase in net earnings per share between December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2008. This has been taken into account in the calculation of the number of options vested and the compensation expense (realization of maximum performance assumed).expense.

2006:

In 2006, the Group granted 4,044,900 share options to three employee groups. The first group comprises Veolia Environnement Group management, including members of the Executive Committee. The second group comprises senior management of Veolia Environnement Group companies. The third group comprises Group employees recognized for their excellent performance. The estimated fair value of each option granted in 2006 was revised to €10.01 (compared to €14.77 as of December 31, 2006) to take account of historical volatility.€10.01. This value was calculated using the Black and Scholes model based on the following underlying assumptions: share price of €44.75, historical volatility of 22.6%, expected dividend yield of 1.92%, risk-free interest rate of 3.69%, estimated exercise maturity of 6 years.

The Group did not grant any ordinary share options or ADS share options in 2005.

Given the progressive vesting conditions based on length of presence in the company, the compensation expense for 2007 and 2006 is €15.6 million and €16.7 million respectively.

Information on share purchase and subscription options granted since 20002001 is detailed below, with a breakdown of movements in 2005, 20062007, 2008 and 20072009 (share option plans excluding SAR plans and free share plans):

 

Number of shares outstanding

 

Weighted average strike price (in € )

As of December 31, 2006

16,800,258

 

33.67

Granted

2,490,400

 

57.05

Adjustment for share capital increase of July 10, 2007

228,525

 

33.79

Exercised

(4,046,076)

 

30.20

Cancelled

(51,934)

 

49.70

Expired

-

 

-

As of December 31, 2007

15,421,173

 

37.71

Granted

-

 

-

Exercised

(886,095)

 

28.36

Cancelled

(242,056)

 

46.78

Expired

(1,804,495)*

 

56.17

As of December 31, 2008

12,488,527

 

35.53

Granted

   

Exercised

(31,011)

 

25.06

Cancelled

(148,418)

 

46.05

Expired

(1,382,525)

 

40.59

As of December 31, 2009

10,926,573

 

34.78

* including 1,742,650 shares due to failure to meet performance conditions


 

Number of shares outstanding

 

Weighted average strike price (in € )

As of December 31, 2004

16,783,757

 

30.93

Granted

-

 

-

Exercised

(168,692)

 

33.07

Cancelled

(650,721)

 

28.43

Expired

-

 

-



F-109F-107



Back to Contents



As of December 31, 2005

15,964,344

 

31.01

Granted

4,044,900

 

44.75

Exercised

(3,065,733)

 

34.32

Cancelled

(143,253)

 

36.04

Expired

-

 

-

As of December 31, 2006

16,800,258

 

33.67

Granted

2,490,400

 

57.05

Share capital increase of July 10, 2007

228,525

 

33.79

Exercised

(4,046,076)

 

30.20

Cancelled

(51,934)

 

49.70

Expired

-

 

-

As of December 31, 2007

15,421,173

 

37.71


The average share price at the time of option exercise in 2009 was €24.21.

Details of Veolia Environnement share purchase and subscription options outstanding as of December 31, 20072009 are as follows:

Strike price

Number of options outstanding

 

Average strike price

(in euros)

 

Average residual term

(in years)

 

Number of options vested

Number of options outstanding

 

Average strike price

(in euros)

 

Average residual term

(in years)

 

Number of options vested

20-25


5,244,480

 

23.51

 

4.33

 

5,244,480

4,651,748

 

23.58

 

2.39

 

4,651,748

30-35


134,029

 

31.41

 

0.48

 

134,029

35-40


2,045,292

 

36.65

 

2.08

 

2,045,292

1,929,114

 

36.65

 

0.08

 

1,929,114

40-45

5,523,472

 

43.08

 

4.83

 

1,520,588

3,709,861

 

44.03

 

4.24

 

0

55-60


2,473,900

 

57.05

 

7.54

 

0

635,850

 

57.05

 

5.54

 

0

15,421,173

 

37.71

 

4.58

 

8,944,389

10,926,573

 

34.78

 

3.40

 

6,580,862

In 2007, the average share price on the exercise of options was €58.11.

As of December 31, 2007, 8,944,389 options were exercisable.2009, 6,580,862 can be exercised.

Employees’ savings plans

Veolia Environnement has set-up standard and leveraged savings plans which enable a large number of employees of Veolia Environnement and its subsidiaries to subscribe for Veolia Environnement shares. Employees generally benefit from a 20% discount compared with the average Veolia Environnement share price during the 20 business days preceding the date of authorization of these plans by the Board of Directors. Shares subscribed by employees under these plans are subject to certain restrictions regarding their sale or transfer by employees.



F-110



Back to Contents


Veolia Environnement did not introduce any new employee savings plans in 2008.

Shares subscribed by Veolia Environnement employees:employees in 2007 and 2009:

 

2007

2006

 

2005

2004

Number of shares

1,415,163

1,502,731

 

1,281,931

1,351,468

Subscription price

€48.37 (*)

€37.52

 

€28.11

€18.71

Amount subscribed

(€ millions)

68.5

56.4

 

30.5

25.3

(*) weighted average price – 1,392,857 shares were subscribed at €48.18 and 22,306 were subscribed at €60.23 (leveraged formula with the grant of share subscription warrants in Germany and leveraged formula with the grant of SAR in Australia,  Canada, South Korea, Portugal and Sweden).


 

2009

2007

Number of shares

624,387

1,415,163

Subscription price

€21.28

€48.37 (*)

Amount subscribed (€ million)

13.3

68.5


(*)

 weighted average price - 1,392,857 shares were subscribed at €48.18 and 22,306 were subscribed at €60.23 (leveraged formula with the grant of share subscription warrants in Germany and leveraged formula with the grant of SAR in Australia, Canada, South Korea, Portugal and Sweden).


In 2009, in the absence of a discount for plan subscribers, the expense recognized for the savings plan totaled €5.1 million and corresponds to the contribution valued as of July 3, the transaction closing date, less a non-transferability discount for the standard plan of €915,000.

In 2007, a compensation expense of €49.7 million was recorded in accordance with IFRS 2 on share-based payments. In 2007, This compensation includes a discount for non-transferability of €7.2 million.

Veolia Group appliedapplies the recommendations of the CNC (communiqué of December 21, 2004 on Group Savings Plans and supplementary notice of February 2, 2007) and, as such, this compensation includes a discount for non-transferability of €7.2 million.. The discount for non-transferability iswas determined by calculating the difference between the value of a five-year forward sale of shares and the spot purchase of the same number of shares, (€62.47), financed by a loan. The risk-free interest rate and the interest rate for calculating the carrying cost arewere 4.05% and 6.74% respectively.in 2007 and 2.76% and 6.90% in 2009. The notional cost of non-transferability of shares as a percentage of the spot rate of the shares at the grant date iswas 12%.

In 2006, a compensation expense of €24.3 million was recorded in accordance with IFRS 2 on share-based payments. In 2006, Veolia Group applied the recommendations of the CNC (communiqué of December 21, 2004 on Group Savings Plans2007 and supplementary notice of February 2, 2007) and, as such, this compensation includes a discount for non-transferability of €6.8 million.  The discount for non-transferability is determined by calculating the difference between the value of a five-year forward sale of shares and the spot purchase of the same number of shares (€49.18), financed by a loan. The risk-free interest rate and the interest rate for calculating the carrying cost are 3.70% and 6.40% respectively. The notional cost of non-transferability of shares as a percentage of the spot rate of the shares at the grant date is 12%.

In 2005, a compensation expense of €14.1 million was recorded17.9% in accordance with IFRS 2 on share-based payments.2009.



F-108



Back to Contents


Pension plans and other post-employment benefits


a-a - Description of plans

In accordance with the regulatory environment and collective agreements, the Group has established defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans (company or multi-employer) in favor of employees and other post-employment benefits.

In addition, Group companies havecertain subsidiaries, supplementary defined contribution plans in the majority of countries where the Group is present.were set up. Expenses incurred by the Group under these plans total €65.4€91 million for 20072009 and €61.3€89 million for 2006.2008.

Certain Group companies have established defined benefit pension plans.plans and/or offer other post-employment benefits (mainly retirement termination payments). The largest defined benefit pension plans are located in the United Kingdom, with a pension obligation as of December 31, 20072009 of €1,069€988 million (and plan assets of €857 million) and in France with a pension obligation as of December 31, 20072009 of €421€478 million (and plan assets of €127 million), notably in respect of retirement termination payments. Benefits are based on the remuneration and length of services of employees.



F-111



Back to Contents


Under collective agreements, certain Group companies participate in multi-employer defined benefit pension plans. However, as these plans are unable to provide a consistent and reliable basis for the allocation of the obligation, assets and costs between the different participating entities, they are recorded as defined contribution plans in accordance with IAS 19. The main multi-employer plans are located in Sweden, Germany and the Netherlands and concern approximately 13,50011,500 employees. The corresponding expense recorded in the Income Statementconsolidated income statement is equal to annual contributions and totals €29.2slightly over €29 million in 2007 and €26.12009 compared to €32 million in 2006.2008. Multi-employer plans in Sweden and the Netherlands are funded by capitalization and have surplus assets under local regulations;capitalization; German multi-employer plans are funded by redistribution.

The Group also offers post-employment benefits and notably health insurance plans in the United States and France.


b-

b-Obligations in respect of defined benefit pension plans and other post-employment benefits

The following schedules present the resulting obligations in respect of defined benefit pension plans and other post-employment benefits

NB: these schedules exclude, by definition, defined contribution pension plans (as the obligation is limited to the annual contribution expensed in the year and the plans do not, therefore, result in the recording of a provision based on actuarial valuations) and multi-employer defined benefit pension plans which are accounted for as defined contribution pension plans.


(€ million)

As of December 31,

Pension Plans

Other post-employment benefits

Change in the benefit obligation

2007

2006

2005

2007

2006

2005

Benefit obligation at beginning of year

1,836.0

1,457.4

1,103.4

53.8

25.9

24.5

Current service cost

61.8

55.6

49.7

1.6

1.5

0.6

Interest cost

85.7

67.2

57.6

2.3

2.1

1.3

Plan participants' contributions

7.9

6.0

6.5

-

-

-

Benefit obligation assumed on acquisition of subsidiaries

41.3

325.2

33.4

-

25.1

-

Benefit obligation transferred on disposal of subsidiaries

(2.3)

(0.9)

(0.8)

-

-

-

Curtailments / liquidations

(12.9)

(9.4)

(9.5)

(8.3)

-

(3.1)

Actuarial loss (gain)

(128.5)

(15.6)

237.8

(5.9)

0.9

(1.0)

Benefits paid

(75.6)

(68.2)

(66.5)

(2.6)

(2.1)

(1.5)

Plan amendments

21.1

20.6

4.7

-

-

-

Other (incl. changes in consolidation scope and foreign exchange translation)

(101.1)

(1.9)

41.1

0.1

0.4

5.1

(1) Benefit obligation at end of year

1,733.4

1,836.0

1,457.4

41.0

53.8

25.9





F-112F-109



Back to Contents


b-1 Change in the defined benefit obligation (D.B.O)

 

As of December 31,

(€ million)

Pension plans and other post-employment benefits

(excluding health insurance coverage of retirees)

Health insurance coverage
of retirees

Change in the defined benefit obligation

2009

2008

2007

2009

2008

2007

Defined benefit obligation at beginning of year

1,522.0

1,733.4

1,836.0

41.7

41.0

53.8

Current service cost

51.3

53.4

61.8

0.6

1.4

1.6

Interest cost

89.4

88.7

85.7

2.4

2.2

2.3

Plan participants’ contributions

5.7

7.1

7.9

-

-

-

Benefit obligation assumed on acquisition of subsidiaries

5.1

7.3

41.3

-

-

-

Benefit obligation transferred on disposal of subsidiaries

(14.3)

(20.4)

(2.3)

-

-

-

Curtailments

Liquidations

(9.3)

(1.1)

(5.0)

(23.2)

(3.3)

(9.6)

-

(2.6)

-

-

(8.3)

-

Actuarial loss (gain)

142.6

(75.2)

(128.5)

1.3

(3.7)

(5.9)

Benefits paid

(78.8)

(79.2)

(75.6)

(2.8)

(3.1)

(2.6)

Plan amendments

3.3

43.0

21.1

-

-

-

Other (incl. changes in consolidation scope and foreign exchange translation)

54.2

(207.9)

(101.1)

0.9

3.9

0.1

(1) Defined benefit obligation at end of year

1,770.1

1,522.0

1,733.4

41.5

41.7

41.0

Other changes in the defined benefit obligation for pension plans and other post-employment benefits (excluding medical insurance coverage of retirees) primarily concern the impact of foreign exchange translation (€60 million in 2009).

b-2 Change in plan assets

 

As of December 31,

(€ million)

Pension plans and other post-employment benefits

(excluding health insurance coverage of retirees)

Health insurance coverage of retirees

Change in plan assets

2009

2008

2007

2009

2008

2007

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

901.1

1,242.7

1,220.8

-

-

-

Expected return on plan assets

58.6

72.8

70.9

-

-

-

Actuarial gains (losses)

79.2

(219.6)

(5.6)

-

-

-

Group contributions

63.4

45.2

74.9

-

-

-

Plan participants’ contributions

5.7

7.1

7.9

-

-

-

Plan assets acquired on acquisition of subsidiaries

4.1

1.8

24.8

-

-

-

Plan assets transferred on disposal of subsidiaries

(2.4)

(1.6)

(0.5)

-

-

-

Liquidations

(0.9)

(12.2)

(9.9)

-

-

-

Benefits paid

(50.5)

(49.0)

(47.8)

-

-

-

Other (incl. changes in consolidation scope and foreign exchange translation)

43.6

(185.9)

(92.8)

-

-

-

(2) Fair value of plan assets at end of year

1,101.9

901.1

1,242.7

-

-

-


(€ million)

As of December 31,

Pension Plans

Other post-employment benefits

Change in plan assets

2007

2006

2005

2007

2006

2005

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

1,220.8

867.2

714.2

-

-

-

Expected return on plan assets

70.9

55.4

46.2

-

-

-

Actuarial gains (losses)

(5.6)

21.5

57.2

-

-

-

Group contributions

74.9

62.0

64.3

-

-

-

Plan participants' contributions

7.9

6.0

6.5

-

-

-

Plan assets acquired on acquisition of subsidiaries

24.8

243.1

0.1

-

-

-

Plan assets transferred on disposal of subsidiaries

(0.5)

(0.1)

-

-

-

-

Liquidations

(9.9)

-

(3.6)

-

-

-

Benefits paid

(47.8)

(45.2)

(39.8)

-

-

-

Other (incl. changes in consolidation scope and foreign exchange translation)

(92.8)

10.9

22.1

-

-

-

(2) Fair value of plan assets at end of year

1,242.7

1,220.8

867.2

-

-

-



F-110



Back to Contents


Other changes in plan assets primarily concern the impact of foreign exchange translation (€51 million in 2009).

Group pension plan assets were invested as follows as of December 31, 2007, 20062009, 2008 and 2005:2007:


As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31,2007

Shares

50%

51%

47%

46%

46%

50%

Bonds and debt instruments

38%

39%

36%

41%

40%

38%

Insurance risk free funds

8%

8%

10%

Cash

3%

1%

6%

Insurance risk-free funds

13%

12%

8%

Liquid assets

0%

0%

3%

Other

1%

1%

1%

0%

2%

1%




(€ million)

2007

2006

2005

Change in repayment entitlement

   

Fair value of repayment entitlement at beginning of year

25.9

7.5

7.2

Expected return on repayment entitlement

1.1

0.7

0.3

Actuarial gains (losses)

(3.3)

(0.4)

0.4

Repayment entitlement acquired on acquisition of subsidiaries

-

18.6

-

Repayments

(2.2)

(0.5)

(0.2)

Other (incl. changes in consolidation scope and foreign exchange translation)

-

-

(0.2)

Fair value of repayment entitlement at end of year

21.5

25.9

7.5




F-113



Back to Contents


The market value of repayment entitlement recorded in assets as of December 31, 2007 is €21.5 million. Repayment entitlement concerns employee rights to post-employment benefits, corresponding to periods during which they were employed by a previous employer.



(€ million)

As of December 31,

Pension Plans

Other post-employment benefits

2007

2006

2005

2007

2006

2005

Funding status= (2) – (1)

(490.7)

(615.2)

(590.2)

(41.0)

(53.8)

(25.9)

Unrecognized past service costs

61.2

50.3

33.2

-

7.0

7.7

Other

(6.4)

(5.3)

(2.8)

-

-

0.8

Net obligation

(435.9)

(570.2)

(559.8)

(41.0)

(46.8)

(17.4)

Provisions

(445.3)

(580.1)

(560.2)

(41.0)

(46.8)

(17.4)

Prepaid benefits

9.4

9.9

0.4

-

-

-


The Projected Benefit Obligation (PBO) is €333.8 million for unfunded defined benefit plans and €1,440.7 million for partially and fully funded plans as of December 31, 2007, compared with €297.8 million and €1,538.2 million respectively at the end of 2006 and €284.3 million and €1,173.1 million respectively at the end of 2005.

The actual return on plan assets was €65.3 million in 2007, compared to €76.9 million in 2006 and €103.4 million in 2005.

Employer contributions in 2007 include exceptional contributions of €28 million in France and the United Kingdom.

The Group plans to make contributions of €45.0 million to defined benefit plans in 2008.

Net benefit costs for the period are as follows:


(€ million)



As of December 31,

Pension Plans

Other post-employment benefits

2007

2006

2005

2007

2006

2005

Current service cost

61.8

55.6

49.7

1.6

1.5

0.6

Interest cost

85.7

67.2

57.6

2.3

2.1

1.3

Expected return on plan assets

(70.9)

(55.4)

(46.2)

-

-

-

Expected return on repayment entitlement

(1.1)

(0.7)

-

-

-

-

Past service costs recognized in the year

7.6

3.8

2.4

0.1

0.5

0.5

Curtailments / liquidations

(3.1)

(10.1)

(4.9)

-

-

-

Other

(0.3)

(1.8)

4.6

-

-

-

Net benefit cost

79.7

58.6

63.2

4.0

4.1

2.4


These costs were recorded in full in operating income, except for interest costs and the expected return on plan assets which are recorded in net finance costs.



F-114



Back to Contents


c- Actuarial assumptions

Actuarial assumptions used for calculation purposes vary depending on the country in which the plan is implemented. Group assets in France are primarily invested with insurance companies and the expected long-term return on these assets is directly linked to past rates of return. Assets in the United Kingdom are primarily invested in shares and bonds via a trust and expected long-term rates of return are based on long-term market performance statistics.


The actual return on plan assets (expected return on plan assets + actuarial gains/losses) was €137.8 million at the end of 2009, compared to -€146.8 million at the end of December 2008 and €65.3 million at the end of December 2007.

Pension PlansThe expected return on plan assets in 2010 is €64 million.

Employees’Group contributions in 2009 include exceptional contributions of €7 million in the United Kingdom.

The Group plans to make contributions of €46 million to defined benefit plans in 2010.

b-3 Change in funding status and the provision

 

As of December 31

 

Pension plans and other post-employment benefits

(excluding health insurance coverage of retirees)

Health insurance coverage of retirees

(€ million)

2009

2008

2007

2009

2008

2007

Funding status = (2) – (1)

(668.2)

(620.9)

(490.7)

(41.5)

(41.7)

(41.0)

Unrecognized past service costs

88.4

96.6

61.2

0.6

-

-

Other

0

(2.1)

(6.4)

 

-

-

Net obligation

(579.8)

(526.4)

(435.9)

(40.8)

(41.7)

(41.0)

Provisions

(594.2)

(539.8)

(445.3)

(40.8)

(41.7)

(41.0)

Prepaid benefits

14.4

13.6

9.4

0

-

-




F-111



Back to Contents


Provisions for post-employment benefits total €635.0 million, compared to €581.5 million in 2008. In 2009, this amount notably includes provisions of €7.2 million reclassified in the consolidated statement of financial position in Liabilities directly associated with assets held for sale (i.e. an amount of €627.8 million recorded in the consolidated statement of financial position).

The defined benefit obligation (DBO) is €347 million for unfunded defined benefit pension obligationsplans and other post-employment benefits (excluding medical insurance coverage of retirees) and €1,423 million for partially or fully funded plans as of December 31, 2009, compared to €341 million and €1,181 million at the end of 2008 and €334 million and €1,441 million at the end of 2007.

b-4 Change in repayment entitlement

(€ million)

Change in repayment entitlement

2009

2008

2007

Fair value of repayment entitlement at beginning of year

22.3

21.5

25.9

Expected return on repayment entitlement

0.9

0.9

1.1

Actuarial gains (losses)

0.9

(1.0)

(3.3)

Repayment entitlement acquired on acquisition of subsidiaries

-

-

-

Repayments

(1.9)

(1.6)

(2.2)

Other (including new repayment entitlements)

0.2

2.5

-

Fair value of repayment entitlement at end of year

22.4

22.3

21.5


The market value of repayment entitlement recorded in assets as of December 31, 2009 is €22.4 million. Repayment entitlement concerns the portion of employee rights to post-employment benefits (including medical insurance coverage of retirees) corresponding to periods during which the employee was employed by a previous employer or where the operating contract stipulates that employee entitlement to post-employment benefits is assumed by a third party.'

b-5 Impact on the consolidated income statement

The net benefit cost for the period is as follows:

 

As of December 31

 

Pension plans and other post-employment benefits

(excluding health insurance coverage of retirees)

Health insurance coverage of retirees

(€ million)

2009

2008

2007

2009

2008

2007

Current service cost

51.3

53.4

61.8

0.6

1.4

1.6

Interest cost

89.4

88.7

85.7

2.4

2.2

2.3

Expected return on plan assets

(58.6)

(72.8)

(70.9)

-

-

-

Expected return on repayment entitlement

-

-

(1.1)

(0.9)

(0.9)

-

Past service costs recognized in the year

10.2

9.4

7.6

0.4

-

0.1

Curtailments / liquidations

(9.5)

(16.3)

(3.1)

(2.6)

-

-

Other(1)

(12.3)

(1.2)

(0.3)

-

2.2

-

Net benefit cost(2)

70.5

61.2

79.7

(0.1)

4.9

4.0


(1)

In 2009, the “Other” heading primarily includes provision charges and reversals for labor commitments involving contract gains and losses.

(2)

The 2008 cost excludes the Clemessy and Crystal entities, divested in December 2008.


These costs were recorded in full in operating income, except for interest costs and the expected return on plan assets which are recorded in net finance costs.



F-112



Back to Contents


c - Actuarial assumptions

Actuarial assumptions used for calculation purposes vary depending on the country in which the plan is implemented.

Pension plans and other post-employment benefits (excluding medical insurance coverage of retirees)

The benefit obligation in respect of pension plans as of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 2006 and 2005 areis based on the following average assumptions:

 

As of
December 31,
2009

As of
December 31,
2008

As of
December 31,
2007

Discount rate

5.23%

5.83%

5.49%

Expected rate of salary increase

3.66%

3.8%

3.5%


As of December 31, 2009, the discount rates in the main areas with regard to post-employment commitments are as follows:

Pension Obligations

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Discount rate

5.49%

4.74%

4.45%

Expected rate of salary increase

3.5%

3.65%

3.3%

As of
December 31, 2009

United Kingdom

5.5%

Euro zone

5.25%


Periodic movementsThe expected returns on plan assets in pension benefit obligations2009, 2008 and 2007, as defined at the start of each year to determine the amount recorded in 2007, 2006 and 2005the income statement, are based onas follows:

 

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31,
2008

As of
December 31,
2007

Expected return on plan assets

6.5%

6.4%

6.0%

Average residual active life expectancy (in years)

13.0

12.0

12.0


In the following average assumptions:United Kingdom, where the vast majority of plan assets are located, the expected return, as defined at the start of 2009, was 7%.


 

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Discount rate

4.7%

4.5%

5.0%

Expected return on plan assets

6.0%

6.2%

6.3%

Expected rate of salary increase

3.7%

3.3%

3.8%

Average residual active life expectancy (in years)

12.0

13.8

15.0

The actual return on plans assets in 2009, 2008 and 2007 2006was 13.8%, -13.7% and 2005 was 5.3%, 7.4% and 14.3% respectively.

The Group benefit obligation is especially sensitive to the discount rate and inflation. A 1% increase in the discount rate would decrease the benefit obligation by €248€237 million and current service costs by €14€10 million. A 1% decrease in the discount rate would increase the benefit obligation by €293€284 million and current service costs by €14€13 million.

Conversely, a 1% increase in the inflation rate would increase the benefit obligation by €226€231 million and current service costs by €6€9 million. A 1% decrease in the inflation rate would decrease the benefit obligation by €193€201 million and current service costs by €6€7 million.

A 1% increase in the expected rate of return assumption would generate additional income of €7.8 million.

Other post-employment benefitsMedical insurance coverage of retirees

Additional assumptions concerning health insurance plans are as follows:

Average rate of increase in health insurance costs

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Assumed rate of increase in health costs in the coming year

5.4 %

5.5%

8.4%

Target rate of increase in costs

3.5%

4.0%

4.2%

Year long-term rate is expected to stabilize

2020

2014

2016


Average rate of increase in health insurance costs

As of
December 31,
2009

As of
December 31,
2008

As of
December 31,
2007

Assumed rate of increase in health costs in the coming year

4.9%

5.1%

5.4%

Target rate of increase in costs

3.5%

3.6%

3.5%

Year long-term rate is expected to stabilize

2019

2020

2020

Assumptions concerning the growth in health insurance costs impact the post-employment benefit obligation as follows: a 1% increase in the assumed rate of increase in health costs would increase the post-employment benefit obligation by €6.3€6.9 million and, conversely, a 1% decrease would reduce the post-employment benefit obligation by €5.0€5.3 million.

Assumptions concerning the rate of increase in health insurance costs have a minimal impact on the current service cost.



F-115F-113



Back to Contents



Amounts for the current and four prior periods are as follows:

Retirement plans and other post-employment benefits(excluding medical insurance coverage of retirees)

2009

2008

2007

2006

Benefit obligation at year end

(1,770.1)

(1,522.0)

(1,733.4)

(1,836.0)

Fair value of plan assets at year end

1,101.9

901.1

1,242.7

1,220.8

Funded status

(668.2)

(620.9)

(490.7)

(615.2)

Actuarial gains (losses) / experience adjustments on obligations

(11.7)

8.8

(0.7)

3.4

% of the benefit obligation

0.66%

-0.58%

0.04%

-0.19%

Actuarial gains (losses) / experience adjustments on plan assets

79.2

(219.6)

(5.6)

21.5


Pension Obligations

2007

2006

2005

Benefit obligation at year end

(1,733.4)

(1,836.0)

(1,457.4)

Fair value of plan assets at year end

1,242.7

1,220.8

867.2

Funded status of plan

(490.7)

(615.2)

(590.2)

Actuarial gains (losses) / experience adjustments on obligations


(0.7)


3.4


(15.6)

Actuarial gains (losses) / experience adjustments on plan assets


(5.6)


21.5


57.2


Other post-employment benefits

2007

2006

2005

Medical insurance coverage of retirees

2009

2008

2007

2006

Benefit obligation at year end

(41.0)

(53.8)

(25.9)

(41.5)

(41.7)

(41.0)

(53.8)

Fair value of plan assets at year end

-

-

-

 

-

-

Funded status of plan

(41.0)

(53.8)

(25.9)

Funded status

(41.5)

(41.7)

(41.0)

(53.8)

Actuarial gains (losses) / experience adjustments on obligations


1.9


(0.7)


1.6

0.5

1.9

-0.7

% of the benefit obligation

-1.20%

-4.56%

-4.63%

1.30%

Actuarial gains (losses) / experience adjustments on plan assets

-

-

-

-

-

-



The cumulative amounts of

actuarialCumulative actuarial gains and losses on obligations and assets recognized in other comprehensive income and the change in the asset ceiling recognized in equity isare as follows:

 

2009

2008

2007

Cumulative amount as of January 1

(185.8)

(48.3)

(172.7)

Change during the period

(61.7)

(137.5)

124.4

Cumulative amount as of December 31

(247.5)

(185.8)

(48.3)


 

2007

2006

Cumulative amount as of January 1

(172.7)

(206.0)

Change during the period

124.4

33.3

Cumulative amount as of December 31

(48.3)

(172.7)


NOTE 33.31

Main acquisitions

33.131.1

Acquisitions in 20072009

Acquisitions in 2007 with related net cash flows exceeding €100 million are described hereafter.

Acquisitions in 20072009 with related net cash flows of less than €100 million represent business combinationscombination costs of €1,574€195 million. These acquisitions contributed €525€110 million to Group revenue in 2007.

No material negative goodwill was recognized in respect of these acquisitions.2009.

In general, goodwill balances are justified by synergies with existing operations in the Group and future developments.


31.2

Acquisition of Sulo (Germany)

Veolia Environnement purchased the entire share capital of the Sulo Group on July 2, 2007. This company is the number two in waste management in Germany and the market leader in the collection of municipal waste and packaging.



F-116



Back to Contents


This transaction was recognized in accordance with the standard on business combinations (IFRS 3).

However, the allocation of the cost of the business combination is likely to be modifiedAcquisitions in 2008 and

Acquired asset and liability fair values recorded at the balance sheet date are provisional. They break down as follows:


(€ million)

Net carrying amount excluding IFRS 5

IFRS 5

Net carrying amount

Fair value adjustments

2007 provisional fair value

Assets

     

Intangible assets

9.6

(0.1)

9.5

260.7

270.2

Property, plant and equipment

279.1

(23.5)

255.6

81.1

336.7

Non-current financial assets

45.4

(0.1)

45.3

1.9

47.2

Deferred tax assets

26.6

 

26.6

85.4

112.0

Working capital assets

258.4

(41.3)

217.1

0.1

217.2

Current financial assets

9.5

2.8

12.3

(0.1)

12.2

Cash

121.8

(2.2)

119.6

-

119.6

Assets classified as held for sale

8.4

192.2

200.6

19.6

220.2

Liabilities

     

Minority interests

-

-

-

(4.6)

(4.6)

Non-current provisions

(41.1)

4.6

(36.5)

-

(36.5)

Long-term borrowings

(1,120.3)

0.5

(1,119.8)

-

(1,119.8)

Deferred tax liabilities

(11.0)

0.9

(10.1)

(139.1)

(149.2)

Other non-current debt

-

-

-

-

-

Current provisions

(31.0)

7.4

(23.6)

-

(23.6)

Working capital liabilities

(172.4)

5.0

(167.4)

-

(167.4)

Short-term borrowings

(131.4)

(34.7)

(166.1)

-

(166.1)

Liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale

(7.9)

(20.3)

(28.2)

-

(28.2)

Total net assets

(756.3)

91.2

(665.1)

305.1

(360.0)

Net assets purchased (100%)

 

 

 

 

(360.0)

Residual goodwill

 

 

 

 

687.6

Business combination cost

 

 

 

 

327.6

Net cash flows relating to the acquisition

 

 

 

 

208

Purchase price

 

 

 

 

327.6

Cash transferred in

 

 

 

 

119.6

The portionend of the business combination cost allocated to intangible assets primarily corresponds to the fair value of customer contracts and customer relations.

The net carrying amount includes the activities of Sulo ET sold outside the Group in September 2007 and recorded in Assets classified as held for sale (pursuant to IFRS 5).

The fair value includes a portion of deferred tax assets on tax losses recognized on the basis of forecast future accounting profits.

The residual goodwill of €687.6 million mainly corresponds to future Group developments in Germany2008 in the Environmental Services sector.opening balance sheets of 2008 acquisitions not yet definitive as of December 31, 2008 (Tianjin Shibei at Veolia Eau-CGE in China, Bartin Aero Recycling Group at Veolia Propreté, and the Praterm Group at Veolia Energie in Poland) were not materially changed during the 12-month allocation period following their acquisition date.

Sulo contributed €628 million to Group revenue in 2007.



F-117F-114



Back to Contents


Acquisition of VSA Tecnitalia (Italy)


On October 3, 2007, the Environmental Services Division purchased 75% of the share capital of VSA Tecnitalia, the Italian subsidiary of Termomeccanica Ecologica, specializing in waste management and treatment.

This transaction was recognized in accordance with the standard on business combinations (IFRS 3).

However, the allocation of the cost of the business combination is likely to be modified in 2008 and asset and liability fair values recorded at the balance sheet date are provisional. They break down as follows:


(€ million)

 

Net carrying amount

Fair value adjustments

Fair value

Assets

    

Intangible assets

 

3.4

28.9

32.3

Property, plant and equipment

 

187.8

(186.5)

1.3

Non-current financial assets

 

3.9

216.5

220.4

Deferred tax assets

 

6.9

18.4

25.3

Working capital assets

 

142.2

(13.6)

128.6

Current financial assets

 

-

6.1

6.1

Cash

 

6.6

-

6.6

Liabilities

    

Minority interests

 

(4.0)

(0.0)

(4.0)

Non-current provisions

 

(3.6)

(40.0)

(43.6)

Long-term borrowings

 

(140.4)

0.1

(140.3)

Deferred tax liabilities

 

(1.7)

(25.0)

(26.7)

Other non-current debt

 

(3.7)

-

(3.7)

Current provisions

 

(0.1)

-

(0.1)

Working capital liabilities

 

(107.1)

-

(107.1)

Short-term borrowings

 

(30.0)

-

(30.0)

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

 

(3.1)

-

(3.1)

Total net assets

 

57.1

4.9

62.0

Net assets purchased (100%)

 

 

 

62.0

Residual goodwill

 

 

 

106.9

Purchase price

 

 

 

104.6

Minority put options at fair value (residual 25%)

 

 

 

64.4

Business combination cost

 

 

 

168.9

Net cash flows relating to the acquisition

 

 

 

101.1

Purchase price

 

 

 

104.6

Cash transferred in

   

3.5

The portion of the business combination cost allocated to intangible assets corresponds to the contract portfolio.

Property, plant and equipment falling within the application scope of IFRIC 12, as applied by the Group, were transferred to non-current financial assets.

The residual goodwill of €106.9 million mainly corresponds to development opportunities in this sector in Italy.

VSA Tecnitalia contributed €26.2 million to Group revenue in 2007.



F-118



Back to Contents


Acquisition of Thermal North America Inc. (United States)

On December 12, 2007, the Energy Services Division purchased the entire share capital of the private company Thermal North America, Inc., the largest portfolio of heating and cooling networks in the United States.

This transaction was recognized in accordance with the standard on business combinations (IFRS 3).

However, the allocation of the cost of the business combination is likely to be modified in 2008 and the asset and liability fair values recorded at the balance sheet date are provisional. They break down as follows:


(€ million)

 

Net carrying amount

Fair value adjustments

Fair value

Assets

    

Intangible assets

 

-

31.4

31.4

Property, plant and equipment

 

375.9

23.0

398.9

Non-current financial assets

 

7.4

(3.2)

4.2

Deferred tax assets

 

19.9

-

19.9

Working capital assets

 

52.9

(1.5)

51.4

Current financial assets

 

20.3

-

20.3

Cash

 

8.5

-

8.5

Liabilities

    

Non-current provisions

 

(3.8)

(4.6)

(8.4)

Long-term borrowings

 

(26.6)

(0.0)

(26.6)

Deferred tax liabilities

 

(27.4)

(17.0)

(44.4)

Other non-current debt

 

(0.1)

-

(0.1)

Current provisions

 

(4.0)

-

(4.0)

Working capital liabilities

 

(40.9)

(5.0)

(45.9)

Short-term borrowings

 

(230.3)

2.0

(228.3)

Total net assets

 

151.8 

25.1

176.9

Net assets purchased (100%)

 

 

 

176.9

Residual goodwill

 

 

 

139.3

Business combination cost

 

 

 

316.2

Net cash flows relating to the acquisition

 

 

 

307.7

Purchase price

 

 

 

316.2

Cash transferred in

   

8.5


The allocation of the business combination cost to intangible assets and property, plant and equipment corresponds to the value of certain intangible assets (value of supplier contracts) and the fair value remeasurement of production assets, respectively.

Residual goodwill of €139.3 million mainly corresponds to future development opportunities in the Energy Services sector in the United States.


33.2

Main acquisitions in 2006

Fair values allocated to assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2006 in respect of the acquisition of Cleanaway in the United Kingdom, Biffa in Belgium, Kunming in China and Supershuttle in the United States were not significantly modified in 2007.

Purchase price allocations to assets and liabilities in respect of the following 2006 acquisitions became definitive in 2007 and are detailed below:



F-119



Back to Contents


Acquisition of SNCM

On May 31, 2006, the Transportation Division signed an agreement for the takeover of SNCM within the framework of the privatization process decided by the French State, for €12.6 million. Given the shareholders’ agreement, SNCM is fully consolidated.

This transaction was recognized using the purchase accounting method.

The allocation of the purchase price to assets and liabilities acquired was provisional at the 2006 year end and was contingent on European Commission approval of the State aid and the granting of the public service license for the Marseille–Corsica crossing. The agreement was finalized in June 2007.

The purchasing price allocation and the fair value of assets and liabilities adopted at the 2006 year end were modified in 2007.

These adjustments break down as follows:

(€ million)

Net carrying amount

Fair value adjustments

2006 provisional fair value

2006 provision fair value corrected for minority put options

2007 adjustments

2007 definitive
fair value

Assets

      

Intangible assets

1.3

-

1.3

1.3

-

1.3

Property, plant and equipment

124.4

268.6

393.0

393.0

(1.1)

391.9

Non-current financial assets

138.6

(28.5)

110.1

110.1

(22.0)

88.1

Deferred tax assets

-

53.1

53.1

53.1

4.5

57.6

Working capital assets

109.1

(4.1)

105.0

105.0

20.4

125.4

Cash

99.3

-

99.3

99.3

-

99.3

Liabilities

      

Non-current provisions

(95.6)

(169.3)

(264.9)

(264.9)

95.0

(169.9)

Long-term borrowings

(2.9)

(31.3)

(34.2)

(34.2)

-

(34.2)

Deferred tax liabilities

-

(66.7)

(66.7)

(66.7)

0.4

(66.3)

Other non-current debt

(38.5)

38.5

-

-

-

-

Current provisions

(2.0)

(93.1)

(95.1)

(95.1)

20.8

(74.3)

Working capital liabilities

(166.4)

2.3

(164.1)

(164.1)

(37.9)

(202.0)

Short-term borrowings

(0.3)

(48.3)

(48.6)

(48.6)

-

(48.6)

Bank overdrafts and other cash position items

(7.8)

0.1

(7.7)

(7.7)

-

(7.7)

Total net assets

159.2

(78.7)

80.5

80.5

80.1

160.6

Net assets purchased (91%)

  

22.8

73.3

72.9

146.2

Residual goodwill

  

10.2

(0.2)

(10.7)

(10.9)

Purchase price

  

12.6

12.6

-

12.6

Minority put options at fair value

  

-

60.5

62.2

122.7

Business combination cost

  

12.6

73.1

62.2

135.3

Net cash flows relating to the acquisition

  

(79.0)

(79.0)

-

(79.0)

Purchase price

  

12.6

12.6

-

12.6

Cash transferred in

  

91.6

91.6

-

91.6

The residual negative goodwill of €10.9 million was expensed in the Income Statement.



F-120



Back to Contents


NOTE 34.

Construction contracts32

Construction contracts


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

Construction contracts in progress / Assets (A)

593.8

403.3

Construction contracts in progress / Liabilities (B)

232.0

109.3

Construction contracts in progress / net (A) – (B)

361.8

294.0

Costs incurred plus income and losses recognized to date (C)

4,068.7

1,826.3

Amounts billed (D)

3,706.9

1,532.3

Construction contracts in progress / net (C) – (D)

361.8

294.0

Customer advances

41.2

21.4

TheAs described in Note 1.23, Veolia recognizes its construction contracts under the percentage of completion method. At each period-end, a statement per contract compares the amount of costs incurred, plus profits and less losses recognized (notably in(including any provisions for losses to completion) andwith the intermediary billings is determined on an individual contract basis. Where positive, this amount is recognized in assets inbillings: “Construction contracts in progress/progress / Assets”. Where negative, this amount is therefore a contract for which the costs incurred and profits recognized in liabilities in “Construction contracts in progress/Liabilities”.exceed the billing issued.

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December31, 2008

As of
December 31,2007

Construction contracts in progress / Assets (A)

358.7

495.6

593.8

Construction contracts in progress / Liabilities (B)

292.4

332.2

232.0

Construction contracts in progress / net (A) – (B)

66.3

163.4

361.8

Costs incurred plus income and losses recognized to date (C)

5,413.7

4,404.8

4,068.7

Amounts billed (D)

5,347.4

4,241.4

3,706.9

Construction contracts in progress / net (C) – (D)

66.3

163.4

361.8

Customer advances

36.8

355.8

41.2


NOTE 35.33

Operating leases

Assets financed by operating lease

The Group enters into operating leases (mainly for transportation equipment)equipment and constructions).

The future minimum lease payments under operating leases amount to €2,753.7 million as of December 31, 2009, compared to €2,530.4 million as of December 31, 2008 and €2,190.0 million as of December 31, 2007, compared to €2,125.9 million as of December 31, 2006 and €1,894.5 million as of December 31, 2005.2007.

As of December 31, 2007,2009, future minimum lease payments under these contracts were as follows:

(€ million)

Operating lease

2010

567.7

2011 & 2012

864.5

2013 & 2014

624.6

2015 and thereafter

696.9

Total future minimum lease payments

2,753.7


(€ million)

Operating lease

2008

495.0

2009 & 2010

780.3

2011 & 2012

410.3

2013 and thereafter

504.4

Total future minimum lease payments

2,190.0

Lease payments for the period

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31, 2007

Minimum lease payments expensed in the period

630.9

609.7

523.4

Contingent rent expensed in the period

18.7

13.6

17.1

Total lease payments for the period

649.6

623.3

540.5


Sub-lease revenue is not material.

Assets leased under operating leases

The value of assets concerned by operating leases within the Group is not material



F-121F-115



Back to Contents


NOTE 36.34

Proportionately consolidated companies

Summarized financial information in respect of proportionately consolidated companies is set out below:below (Group part):

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31, 2007

Non-current assets

8,188.4

7,682.7

6,757.3

Current assets

3,984.1

3,670.8

3,115.5

Total assets

12,172.5

11,353.5

9,872.8

Equity attributable to owners of the Company 

3,128.1

2,910.7

2,295.9

Equity attributable to non-controlling interests

915.1

801.6

895.5

Non-current liabilities

3,295.8

3,016.6

2,650.8

Current liabilities

4,833.4

4,624.6

4,030.6

Total equity and liabilities

12,172.4

11,353.5

9,872.8


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Non-current assets

6,757.3

5,651.9

5,635.3

Current assets

3,115.5

2,898.2

2,450.2

Total assets

9,872.8

8,550.1

8,085.5

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

2,295.9

1,367.0

1,375.3

Minority interests

895.5

945.9

759.0

Non-current liabilities

2,650.8

3,293.4

3,230.0

Current liabilities

4,030.6

2,943.8

2,721.2

Total equity and liabilities

9,872.8

8,550.1

8,085.5



(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31, 2007

Income Statement data

     

Revenue

4,623.7

4,143.4

3,679.1

5,520.3

5,481.1

4,623.7

Operating income

659.9

540.1

430.9

636.8

612.6

659.9

Net income for the year

322.9

109.9

100.1

326.5

261.2

322.9

Financing data

 

   

 

Operating cash flows

567.0

521.2

525.4

819.8

712.3

567.0

Investing cash flows

(566.8)

(258.0)

(347.0)

(644.9)

(621.7)

(566.8)

Financing cash flows

(289.9)

(281.3)

(274.2)

(316.1)

(533.2)

(289.9)


The main contributions ofmost material proportionately consolidated companies wereare as follows:

BWB (Berlin water services company) in the Water Division in Germany is 50% consolidated and contributed revenue of €582€602 million, operating income of €270€225 million, net assets of €2,708€2,735 million and net indebtednessdebt of €1,405€1,498 million;

Dalkia International is 75.81% consolidated and contributed revenue of €2,027€2,282 million, operating income of €214€158 million and net assets of €1,643€1,857 million;

theThe Proactiva Group in South America contributed revenue of €130€202 million, operating income of €16€26 million and net assets of €52€108 million;


The Shenzhen and Tianjin Shibei contracts in the Water Division in China are 25% and 49% consolidated respectively and contributed €138 million and €48 million respectively to revenue and €237 million and €150 million respectively to net assets;

A change in the governance of the partnership with Mubadala Development Company on December 22, 2009 led to a change in consolidation method (from full to proportionate consolidation) for the activity of the Water Division in North Africa and the Middle East. This change in governance also resulted in financial debt restructuring, whereby the Group granted a 16-year loan for €121 million at a fixed rate of 5.7% (market conditions).

NOTE 37.

Tax reviews



F-116



Back to Contents


NOTE 35

Tax audits

In the normal course of their business, the Group entities in France and abroad are subjected to regular tax reviews.audits.

In France, the tax authorities have carried out nearly 50various tax reviewsaudits in respect of both consolidated tax groups and individual entities. Theseentities, including a significant number of reviews focusing specifically on local taxes. The tax audits concerning the major Group companies in France, including Veolia Environnement SA, were closed in 2009. To date, none of these reviews are not all definitively closed: certain issues giving risehave led to revised assessments are still under discussion as part of the normal process and other revised assessments have not been called for collection. When a review is closed and the tax amount agreed withmaterial liabilities to the tax authorities in excess of amounts estimated during the review of tax base is adjusted accordingly. Veolia Group records a provision in respectrisks and the booking of revised assessments under discussion with the tax authorities, where the issue in question does not merely represent a timing difference and an outflow is probableprovisions in accordance with IAS 37. Quite naturally,Certain amounts are still being negotiated with the largest provisions concern the Group’s largest companies in France.



F-122



Back to Contents


French tax authorities.

Outside France, the Group is present in numerous countries and is constantly the subject to tax reviews.audits. Among the countries where the Group has a strong presence, tax reviews are notablyaudits were in progress as of December 31, 2008 in Germany and Morocco covering fiscal years 2000 to date.were completed in 2009. The liabilities arising from these tax audits had been anticipated and provided for in accordance with IAS 37.

Tax audits are still in progress, particularly in Italy. Discussions continued in 2009 with the Italian tax authorities. Where necessary, revised assessments and identified uncertain tax positions in respect of which a revised assessment has not been yet issued are adequately provided, and provision amounts are regularly reviewed in accordance with IAS 37IAS37 criteria.

In the United States, the Group has launched a pre-filing agreement procedure with the Internal Revenue Service (I.R.S) in order to validate the amount of tax losses as of December 31, 2006, following the reorganization of Water Division activities (“Worthless Stock Deduction”). This reorganization led to the recognition of ordinary losses relating toresulting from the operations and disposal of former U.S. Filter activities in recentrespect of fiscal years as ordinary tax losses,1999 to 2004, in an amount which could exceed U.S.$ 4 billion. Despite holding several external opinions confirming its position,No major event took place in 2009 that could call into question the Group decided to request immediate validation of these tax losses by the tax authorities, given the amount in question. The Group has received nearly 30 detailed information requests from the I.R.S and will provide comprehensive replies.Group’s position.

In addition, the Group is also subject to a tax review in the United States covering its ordinary activities in 2004 and 2005. This tax review is complicated by the numerous legal reorganizations which accompanied the piecemeal sale of U.S. Filter assets. The duration and outcome of this review are difficult to estimate precisely.  Nonetheless, the majority of potential tax uncertainties, if confirmed, would have a limited impact on the consolidated financial statements of the Group due to the tax losses generated by the reorganization of the Water Division activities.


NOTE 38.36

Off-balance sheet commitments

Specific commitments given

Specific Berlin contract commitments

Under the Berlin water contract, the Group may be obligedplans to purchaseacquire easement rights of passage for water pipes from landowners.

The gross amount of this investment could reach €426 million (50%), approximately €175 million of which would be borne by the Berlin Lander, representing a net commitment of €250 million. In

Given the eventuncertain nature of acquisitionestimating these easement rights, this commitment was retained off-balance sheet as of December 31, 2007.

More precise estimates were performed in 2008, producing a valuation of €113 million (100%), including a portion, estimated at €57 million, to be reimbursed by the Berlin Lander. The Group therefore recognized an asset and operating liability of €113 million. As these rights by landowners,vest over the period to 2011, the amounts paid wouldwill be recorded, net of amounts reimbursed by the Berlin Lander, in operating financial assets in the Group balance sheet, net and remunerated underpursuant to the contract.

Agreements with EDF

Veolia Environnement granted EDF a call option covering all of its Dalkia shares in the event an EDF competitor takes control of the company.

Likewise EDF granted Veolia Environnement a call option covering all of its Dalkia shares, exercisable in the event of a change in the legal status of EDF orand should a Veolia Environnement competitor, acting alone or in concert, take control of EDF. Failing an agreement on the share transfer price, this would be decided by an expert.


Breakdown by maturity of specific commitments given


(€ million)


As of December 31,
2005

As of December 31,
2006

As of December 31,
2007

Maturity

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Southern Water Put

321

-

-

-

-

Specific Berlin contract commitment (50%)

610

426

426

102

324

-

Specific commitments given

931

426

426

102

324

-




F-123F-117



Back to Contents


Other commitments given


Other commitments and contingencies include neither collateral guarantees supporting borrowings (see Note 39)38) nor specific commitments and contingencies described above.


Other off-balance sheet commitments and contingencies arebreak down as follows:

(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2007

Maturity

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2008

As of December 31, 2009

Maturing in

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Less than
1 year

1 to 5 years

More than
5 years

Operational guarantees including performance bonds

3,108.4

4,043.6

5,591.4

852.9

2,588.4

2,150.1

5,591.4

6,624.9

6,950.9

2,442.4

2,418.8

2,089,7

Financial guarantees

 

 

  

 835.6

667.5

679.4

229.4

275.8

174.2

Debt guarantees

250.8

300.7

355.6

128.3

153.9

73.4

355.6

303.0

258.3

89.3

113.6

55.4

Vendor warranties received

515.5

448.6

480.0

140.6

198.0

141.4

480.0

364.5

421.1

140.1

162.2

118.8

Commitments given

 

 

 

 

617.1

507.8

431.6

283.7

97.6

50.3

Purchase commitments

94.6

149.3

589.9

445.0

109.1

35.8

589.9

476.5

425.1

277.8

97.6

49.7

Sales commitments

8.6

31.3

27.2

9.8

15.4

2.0

27.2

31.3

6.5

5.9

-

0.6

Other commitments given

 

 

 

 

957.3

912.7

1,065.3

489.4

267.2

308.7

Letters of credit

819.7

904.5

573.8

327.7

241.1

5.0

573.8

706.7

604.5

329.1

152.1

123.3

Other commitments given

772.2

749.8

383.5

177.0

74.3

132.2

383.5

206.0

460.8

160.3

115.1

185.4

Other commitments given

5,569.8

6,627.8

8,001.4

2,081.3

3,380.2

2,539.9

8,001.4

8,712.9

9,127.2

3,444.9

3,059.4

2,622.9


Operational guarantees:in the course of their normal activities, the Group's subsidiaries give operational or operating guarantees to their customers. If the company doesencompass all commitments not reach its specified targets, it may have to pay penalties. This commitment is often guaranteed by an insurance company, a financial institution, or the parent company of the Group. These guarantees included in the contract are performance commitments. The insurance company or the financial institution often requires counter guarantees from the parent company. The commitment is the amount of the guarantee anticipated in the contract and given by the parent companyrelating to the customerfinancing of operations, required in respect of contracts and markets and more generally the operations and activities of Group companies. Such guarantees include bid bonds accompanying tender offers, advance payment bonds and completion or the counter guarantee given by the parent company to the insurance company or to the financial institution.

Insurance companies have issued performance bonds in connection withgiven on the activitiessignature of the Group’s US subsidiaries (operating guarantees, site restoration guarantees), which have been underwritten by Veolia Environnement up to a maximum amount of U.S.$1.4 billion (drawn U.S.$0.2 billion as of December 31, 2007).contracts or concession arrangements.

Debt guarantees:guarantees: these relate to guarantees given to financial institutions in connection with the financial debtdebts of non-consolidated companies, equity associates, or the non-consolidated portion of financial debts of proportionately consolidated companies.companies when the commitment covers the entire amount.

Vendor warrantieswarranties:: these include warranties linked to the sale in 2004 of Water activities in the United States in the amount of €292€246.5 million.

Purchase commitments: these include commitments given by Group companies to purchase shares in other companies or to invest. As of December 31, 2007,2009, these commitments mainly concerned the Energy Services Division (€22582.4 million), the Environmental Services Division (€18223.0 million), the Transportation Division (€103.541.1 million) and the Water Division (€79241.7 million).

Letters of credit: letters of credit delivered by financial institutions to Group creditors, customers and suppliers guaranteeing operating activities.

The impactThese off-balance sheet commitments notably include:

- Off-balance sheet commitments and site restoration provisions:

Pursuant to environmental texts and legislation concerning the operation of changeswaste storage facilities, the Group is obliged to provide financial guarantees to local authorities/government agencies. These guarantees notably encompass the restoration and supervision of the site during 30 years or more, depending on national legislation (currently 60 years in the U.S. dollar exchange rateUnited Kingdom), following its operation.

In this context, performance bonds, letters of credit, etc. are issued to local authorities and other public bodies.

Depending on the contract, these guarantees cover the costs necessary for the restoration of all or part of the site and the supervision of the site during 30 years.

These guarantees are quantified in accordance with legally or contractually-defined procedures. These guarantees, which are given in their total amount from the start of operations, expire at the end of the commitment (termination of restoration work and site supervision).



F-118



Back to Contents


Therefore, the amount of our commitment for the restoration and supervision of waste storage facilities is in general different from the amount of the provision recorded in the Group accounts (see Note 1.13).

Provisions calculated by the Group are based on different valuations (based on internal policies regarding site security and designed for optimal environmental protection), which take into account the progressive nature of the obligation: operation of the storage facility results in progressive damage to the site and, as such, a related liability is recognized as the facility is operated.

If the amount of the commitment is less than the provision at the balance sheet date, an off-balance sheet commitment is not disclosed. Conversely, if the amount of the commitment is greater than the provision, an off-balance sheet commitment is disclosed in the amount not provided.

-engineering and construction activities:

Total commitments and contingencies is approximately -€229.9 million and mainly concernsgiven in respect of construction activities in the Water Division (-€94.3 million)(Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies) amount to €2,823.6 million as of December 31, 2009, compared to €2,969.8 million as of December 31, 2008 and Veolia Environnement (-€72.7 million)€1,630.4 million as of December 31, 2007.

Total commitments received (see below) in respect of these same activities amount to €757.2 million as of December 31, 2009, compared to €856.9 million as of December 31, 2008 and €866.2 million as of December 31, 2007.

Commitments given and received in respect of the five principal contracts account for approximately 80% of total commitments.

-commitments given in respect of concession contracts:

Pursuant to public service contracts with a public entity, the Group may be called on/obliged to invest in infrastructures that will then be operated and remunerated in accordance with contractual terms and conditions.

The contractual commitment may concern both the financing of installations and infrastructures to be used in operations and also the maintenance and replacement of infrastructures necessary to operations.

An analysis of the accounting treatment of these commitments is presented in Notes 1.21, 1.14 and 17.

Expenditure relating to the replacement or restoration of installations is monitored and recognized through any timing differences between the total contractual commitment over the contract term and its realization, in accordance with the IAS 37 on Provisions.

Expenditure relating to the construction, maintenance and restoration of concession assets is reviewed with respect to IFRIC 12 and detailed in Note 1.21.

Firm commodity purchase commitments:

As part of supply management and cost optimization, certain Group subsidiaries may be required, depending on their activities, to set-up derivatives to fix the cost of commodity supplies where the contracts do not offer appropriate protection (see Note 29.1.3) or contract forward purchases or sales of commodities.

Firm commodity purchase commitments mainly concern:

coal in the Energy Services Division in Central European countries

gas in the Energy Services Division (mainly in France) and in the Water Division

electricity in the Water Division

With regard to both gas and electricity, the number of contracts signed enables the Group to significantly reduce political and counterparty risk.

forward purchases of fuel are primarily contracted by the Transportation Division (SNCM).



F-124F-119



Back to Contents


Other commitments and contingencies given break down by Division as follows:

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31, 2007

Water

6,036.4

5,891.8

4,368.3

Environmental Services

831.1

901.7

1,171.1

Energy Services

700.3

538.1

755.7

Transportation

533.2

415.8

398.3

Proactiva

45.2

50.6

39.8

Holding companies

942.0

891.3

1,241.5

Other

39.0

23.6

26.7

Total

9,127.2

8,712.9

8,001.4


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Water

4,368.3

3,253.2

2,388.4

Environmental Services

1,171.1

876.7

715.2

Energy Services

755.7

543.0

541.6

Transportation

398.3

294.9

274.4

Proactiva

39.8

5.7

10.3

Holding companies

1,241.5

1,598.3

1,584.7

Other

26.7

56.0

55.2

Total

8,001.4

6,627.8

5,569.8


The increase in commitments given in the Water Division is mainly due to new construction contracts won in the Middle East and Australia by the Water Division and the impact of new acquisitions during the year.

Lease contracts entered into by the Group are analyzed in Notes 1817 and 35.33.

Litigation (not accounted for)Contingent assets and liabilities relating to legal or arbitration proceedings

On September 12, 2008, a suburban train operated by Connex Railroad LLC, a Veolia Transport subsidiary, on behalf of the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA), collided with a Union Pacific freight train in Chatsworth, California. This accident resulted in 25 fatalities and a significant number of injuries. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), a federal agency, with which Connex Railroad is cooperating, reached a preliminary conclusion that the two causes of the accident were, first, lack of attention by the engineer, who did not observe a red light and, second, the fact that the SCRRA had not installed an automatic train braking system in compliance with prior recommendations of the NTSB. Actions seeking an undetermined amount of total damages have been filed by the heirs of the deceased passengers and the majority of injured passengers, in the courts of the state of California in Los Angeles, against Connex Railroad LLC, its parent company, Veolia Transportation Inc., the SCRRA and the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. These actions have been consolidated into a single case. A hearing specifically dedicated to the issue of liability is scheduled for November 2010. At the same time, Connex Railroad LLC and the SCRRA have brought before the federal courts in California their disputes concerning their respective contractual liability in connection with the suits filed as a result of this accident and are still awaiting a hearing date. A U.S. federal statute limits the total amount of damages that may be awarded for injuries and property damage arising from a single passenger rail accident to U.S.$200 million. Notice of this accident has been given to the relevant insurers of the Group. At this point, the Group is unable to determine whether the financial consequences of this accident could significantly affect its financial position or results.

Furthermore, the Group is subject to various litigationseveral other litigations in the normal course of its business. In accordance with IAS 37 criteria, management does not consider it appropriate to record a provision or recognize deferred income in respect of these litigationslegal or arbitration proceedings at the balance sheet date, due to the uncertain nature of their outcome.

Commitments received

(€ million)

As of
December 31, 2009

As of
December 31, 2008

As of
December 31, 2007

Guarantees received

1,756.3

2,082.0

1,459.7

Debt guarantees

303.4

351.6

266.6

Vendor warranties received

142.0

294.8

53.6

Other guarantees received

1,310.9

1,435.6

1,139.5


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Guarantees received

1,459.7

951.3

1,128.6

Debt guarantees

266.6

171.0

190.5

Vendor warranties received

53.6

34.6

27.4

Other guarantees received

1,139.5

745.7

910.7

The increase in these commitments is due tonotably consist of commitments received from our partners in respect of construction contractscontracts.

The decrease in 2009 was mainly due to the expiry of a warranty obtained from an acquisition in the Middle EastEnvironmental Services Division, the partial terminations in the Construction activity of Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies and new acquisitionsthe cancellation of the period.guarantee received from the British Treasury for a credit line repaid at the start of the year.

In addition, the Group has undrawn medium and short-term credit lines and syndicated loans in the amount of €5€4.7 billion (see Note 30.2)29.3).



F-125



Back to Contents


NOTE 39.

Collateral given supporting borrowings

As of December 31, 2007, €634 million of collateral guarantees was given supporting borrowings. The breakdown by type of asset is as follows (in € million):


Type of pledge / mortgage

Amount pledged (a)

Total balance sheet amount (b)

Corresponding %

(a) / (b)

Intangible assets

2

1,706

0.10%

Property, plant and equipment

293

9,203

3.18%

Financial assets (*)

313

-

 

Total non-current assets

608

-

-

Current assets

26

17,214

0.15%

Total assets

634

-

-

*

As the majority of financial assets pledged as collateral are shares of consolidated subsidiaries, the ratio is not significant.



The breakdown by maturity is as follows:


(€ million)

As of December 31, 2005

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2007

Maturing in

Less than 1 year

1 to 5 years

More than 5 years

Intangible assets

2

2

2

-

2

-

Property, plant and equipment

461

390

293

64

173

56

Mortgage pledge

92

80

15

12

3

-

Other PP&E mortgage pledge(1)

369

310

278

52

170

56

Financial assets(2)

408

389

313

20

152

141

Current assets

35

23

26

9

17

-

Pledges on receivables

32

21

23

7

16

-

Pledges on inventories

3

2

3

2

1

-

Total

906

804

634

93

344

197

(1)

mainly equipment and traveling systems.

(2)

 including non-consolidated investments of €196 million and other financial assets of €117 million as of December 31, 2007.




F-126F-120



Back to Contents


NOTE 37

Greenhouse gas emission rights

The process governing the grant and valuation of these rights is presented in Note 1.25, Greenhouse gas emission rights.

The position in 2009 is as follows:

Volume in thousands of metric tons

As of January 1, 2009

Entries into the consolidation scope

Granted

Purchased / sold / cancelled

Consumed

As of December 31, 2009

Total

1,363

433

13,504

441

(12,187)

3,554


Similarly to 2008, the Group entered into new swaps of EUA II and CER in order to benefit from market opportunities.

At the end of 2007 and during 2008, the Group entered into allowance loan transactions (EUA II and CER) effective in 2008 with surrender in 2012. The commission received on allowance loans is recorded on receipt as deferred income and recognized in the Income Statement on a straight-line basis over the loan term.

Entries into the scope of consolidation concern Energy Services Division acquisitions in France.

Phase II rights granted free of charge for fiscal years 2010-2012 are estimated at €515 million. Future allocations were measured using the spot price as of December 31, 2009.

NOTE 40.38

Collateral given supporting borrowings

As of December 31, 2009, the Group has given €699 million of collateral guarantees in support of borrowings. The breakdown by type of asset is as follows (€ million):

Type of pledge / mortgage

Amount pledged (a)

Total consolidated statement of financial position amount (b)

Corresponding %

(a) / (b)

Intangible assets

5

1,438

0.35%

Property, plant and equipment

151

9,382

1.61%

Financial assets*

504

-

-

Total non-current assets

660

-

-

Current assets

39

20,222

0.19%

Total assets

699

-

-


*

As a majority of financial assets pledged as collateral are shares of consolidated subsidiaries and other financial assets, the ratio is not significant.




F-121



Related party transactionsBack to Contents


The breakdown by maturity is as follows:

(€ million)

As of December 31,2007

As of December 31, 2008

As of December 31, 2009

Maturing in

Less than
1 year

1 to 5
years

More than
5 years

Intangible assets

2

2

5

-

1

4

Property, plant and equipment

293

225

151

19

40

92

Mortgage pledge

15

16

37

3

3

31

Other PP&E pledge(1)

278

209

114

16

37

61

Financial assets(2)

313

588

504

10

65

429

Current assets

26

109

39

3

9

27

Pledges on receivables

23

108

39

3

9

27

Pledges on inventories

3

1

0

-

-

-

Total

634

924

699

32

115

552


(1)

mainly equipment and traveling systems.

(2)

including non-consolidated investments of €198 million and other financial assets (primarily operating financial assets) of €306 million as of December 31, 2009.


NOTE 39

Related-party transactions

The purpose of this note is to present related-party transactions.

39.1

“Related party” concept

Group related parties comprise, in accordance with IAS 24, Related Party Disclosures, the companies over which the Group exercises control, joint control or significant influence (joint ventures and equity associates), shareholders who exercise joint control over group joint ventures, minority shareholders who exercise significant influence over group subsidiaries, key management personnel of the group and the companies over which the latter exercise control, joint control or significant influence or in which they hold significant voting rights.

In addition, as the share capital of Veolia Environnementthe Group is widely held. As a result,held, certain shareholders holding only a small percentage ofstake in the share capital are nonetheless considered related parties.

39.2

Compensation and related benefits of key management personnel

Group Executive Committee members and directors represent the key management personnel of the Group.

The following table summarizes amounts due by the Group in respect of compensation and other benefits granted to key management personnel:

(€ million)

As of
December 31,
2009

As of
December 31,
2008

As of
December 31,
2007

Short-term benefits, excluding employer contributions(a)

4.7

8.2

6.9

Employer contributions

2.0

3.2

2.5

Post-employment benefits(b)

1.1

1.2

1.0

Other long-term benefits(c)

-

-

-

Share-based payments

0.6

1.0

1.6

Contract termination payments

-

-

-

Total

8.4

13.6

12.0

(a)

Fixed and variable compensation, employee benefits and directors fees. Variable compensations comprise amounts due in respect of the fiscal year and paid during the next fiscal year.

(b)

Current service costs.

(c)

Other compensation vested but payable in the long-term.




F-122



Back to Contents


All the Board of Directors members, except the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, only receive as compensation director’s fees from Veolia Environnement and its controlled companies. Director’s fees paid to Directors, excluding the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, totaled €771,795 in 2009, €771,952 in 2008 and €741,380 in 2007.

Item 6 of this annual report filed on Form 20-F contains detailed disclosures on compensation and benefits paid to key management personnel of the Group.

39.3

Transactions with other related parties

39.3.1

Relations with BNP Paribas (1.03% interestproportionately consolidated companies and equity associates

The Group granted a loan of €1,614.9 million to Dalkia International and its subsidiaries Siram and Dalkia Pologne, which are proportionately consolidated at 75.81% The non-group portion of this loan is recorded in assets in the share capital), Société Générale1Group consolidated statement of financial position in the amount of €390.8 million (see Note 11 Other non-current financial assets).

In December 2009, the Group sold its investment in Compagnie Méridionale de Navigation (CMN) which was consolidated using the equity method.

In addition, given the Group’s businesses, operating flows between companies are generally limited to companies operating in the same country. As such, the level of operating transactions between the Group and proportionately consolidated companies is not material.

However, certain contractual agreements within the Water Division, notably in Asia and Central Europe, impose the existence of a holding company (generally equity accounted or proportionately consolidated) and companies carrying the operating contract (generally fully consolidated). These complex legal arrangements generate “asset supply” flows between the companies generally jointly controlled or subject to significant influence and the companies controlled by the Group. Assets are generally supplied for a specific remuneration that may or may not include the maintenance of the installations in good working order or the technical improvement of the installations.

39.3.2

Relations with Group shareholders

Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations (10.36%(with a 9.58% interest in the share capital).

ManagementThe Chief Executive Officer of these three shareholderthis financial groupsinstitution is represented on the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement.

The Group had the following relations with the Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations during fiscal 2009:

the financing agreements between the two groups bear interest at market conditions.

in connection with the ongoing combination at the year-end between Veolia Transport and Transdev.

Electricité de France (with a 3.70% interest in share capital as of December 31, 2009).

On November 25, 2009, Mr. Proglio was appointed Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the EDF Group by ministerial decree; he also acts as Chairman of the Veolia Environnement has financing relations with these three institutions comprising global financing arrangements (syndicated loans, bilateral credit lines), structured financing ("Dailly law" discountingGroup Board of receivables, securitization program and financingDirectors from November 27, 2009 (publication date of the automobile pool)decree).

EDF Group has a 3.70% interest in Veolia Environnement, a 34% interest in Dalkia and cash management. Relations are remunerateda 25% interest in Dalkia International. In accordance with the Decree 97-07, EDF purchases electricity produced in France by Dalkia cogeneration power plants at market rates.conditions. Electricity sold by Dalkia to EDF in 2007, 2008 and 2009 totaled €521.7 million, €608.4 million and €568.7 million, respectively.

In addition,

F-123



Back to Contents


There are under certain conditions cross options between Veolia Environnement signedand EDF for all the securities held by each party in case of taking control of one or the other (see Note 36 Off-balance sheet commitments).

BNP Paribas (with a guarantee contract with Société Générale pursuant to the0.57% interest in share capital increase detailed in the “Key events” note. This contract was signedas of December 31, 2009)

The Chief Executive Officer of BNP Paribas is represented on June 11, 2007 and authorized by the Board of Directors of Veolia Environnement on June 10, 2007 as a related party agreement €13.5 million was paid to Veolia. The financing agreements between the two groups bear interest at market conditions.

Société Générale under this contract.(with a 0.15% interest in share capital as of December 31, 2009)

The financing agreements between the two groups bear interest at market conditions.

Mr. Bouton, member of the Veolia Environnement Board of Directors, is no longer Chairman of the Board of Directors of Société Générale as of May 6, 2009.

Vivendi Universal undertook to pay an indemnity to Veolia Environnement in respect of the financial management of replacement expenses and then transferred this obligation to Société Générale under a perfect delegation contract on December 21, 2004. As such, Vivendi Universal no longer has an obligation to Veolia Environnement with respect thereto.

Conversely, Société Générale, considered as a related party, is liable to Veolia Environnement in this respect for a maximum amount of €59.0€17.6 million as of December 31, 2007,2008, which may bewas claimed each year up to 2010 under the conditions laid down in the contract.its entirety as of December 31, 2009.

39.3.3

Veolia Environnement claimed an amount of €39.6 million from Société Générale in respect of 2007.


Relations with Electricité de France (3.88% interest inother related parties

Relations with Lazard, Groupama, ENI and Saint Gobain

These Groups and Véolia Environnement have common directors.

Any business relations between these groups and Veolia Environnement)are maintained at market conditions.

EDF Group has a 3.88% interest in Veolia Environnement, a 34% interest in Dalkia and a 25% interest in Dalkia International. In accordance with the Decree 97-07, EDF purchases electricity produced in France by Dalkia cogeneration power plants at a guaranteed fixed price for 2006/2007. Electricity sold by Dalkia to EDF in 2005, 2006 and 2007 totaled €455.0 million, €482.6 million and €521.7 million respectively.


Relations with EBRD

The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) holds minoritynon-controlling interests in Group operating entities in Central Europe, primarily in the Energy Services, Transportation and Water Divisions.

In 2007,2009, the EBRD subscribed to a reserved share capital increaseacquired an additional 6.88% interest in Veolia Voda, which encompasses all the amountoperating activities of €90.4 million, performed by the subsidiary holding the Water Division’s investmentsDivision in Central and Eastern Europe (10% of the share capital).Europe.


1 Société Générale no longer holds Veolia Environnement share capital as of 12/31/2007, but held 1.16% of the share capital as of 07/31/2007.



F-127F-124



Back to Contents


Relations with proportionately consolidated companiesNOTE 40

Veolia Environnement granted a loan of €986 million to Dalkia International, proportionately consolidated by Dalkia at 75.81%. The non-group portion of this loan is recorded in assets in the Group consolidated balance sheet (Other non-current financial assets) in the amount of €238.7 million.

 With respect to the Berlin water services company acquisition debt, Veolia Environnement guaranteed the debts issued by RVB, proportionately consolidated at 50%, in the amount of €675 million.

In addition, given the Group’s businesses, operating flows between companies are generally limited to companies operating in the same country. As such, the level of operating transactions between the Group and proportionately consolidated companies is not material.

However, certain contractual agreements, notably in Asia and Central Europe, impose the existence of a holding company (generally equity accounted or proportionately consolidated) and companies carrying the operating contract (generally fully consolidated). These complex legal arrangements generate “asset provision” flows between the companies jointly controlled or subject to significant influence and the companies controlled by the Group. Assets are generally provided for a specific remuneration that may or may not include the maintenance of the installations in good working order or the technical improvement of the installations.


Compensation of Executive Committee members and directors

Members of the Group Executive Committee represent the key management personnel of the Group.


Compensation of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

The following schedule presents the total gross compensation (fixed and variable compensation, directors' fees and employee benefits) paid to Henri Proglio during 2005, 2006 and 2007.

 (in euros)

Compensation

Directors fees' paid by controlled companies

Benefits in kind(4)

Total gross compensation

Fixed

Variable

VE directors' fees

Compensation paid in 2005

944,996

850,000(1)

34,000

70,912

2,616

1,902,524

Compensation paid in 2006

944,996

1,062,500(2)

38,250

66,382

2,666

2,114,794

Compensation paid in 2007

992,000

1,275,000(3)

40,000

64,079

2,954

2,374,033

(1)

Variable compensation paid in 2005 in respect of 2004.

(2)

Variable compensation paid in 2006 in respect of 2005.

(3)

Variable compensation paid in 2007 in respect of 2006.

(4)

Company car


The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is a member of the supplementary defined contribution collective pension plan for Group Executive Management and the Executive Committee supplementary defined benefit collective pension plan set up in 2006.

Compensation of Directors (excluding the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer)

Directors' fees paid to Directors, excluding the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, totaled €648,186.25.




F-128



Back to Contents


Compensation of Executive Committee members (excluding the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer)(1)

 (in euros)

Fixed compensation

Variable compensation

Total compensation

Compensation paid in 2005

2,393,989

1,539,360(2)

3,933,349

Compensation paid in 2006

2,431,494

1,950,000(3)

4,381,494

Compensation paid in 2007

2,160,041

2,109,478(4)

4,269,519

(1)

Executive Committee members as of December 31, 2007.

(2)

Variable compensation paid in 2005 in respect of 2004.

(3)

Variable compensation paid in 2006 in respect of 2005.

(4)

Variable compensation paid in 2007 in respect of 2006.


Profit sharing compensation, not included in the above amounts, of €30,000 was paid in June 2007 in respect of 2006.

Members of the Company’s Executive Committee also received total directors' fees of €203,308, in respect of their duties in Veolia Environnement Group companies, in France and abroad.


Share purchase and subscription options

Share subscription or purchase options granted to the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in 2007: 110,000

Share subscription or purchase options exercised by the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer in 2007: 299,733

Share subscription or purchase options granted to Executive Committee members (excluding the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer) in 2007: 220,000

Share subscription or purchase options exercised by Executive Committee members (excluding the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer) in 2007: 254,187


NOTE 41.

Consolidated employees

Consolidated employees * break down as follows:

By division

As of
December 31,
2009

As of
December 31,
2008(1)

As of
December 31,
2007(1)

Water

80,239

78,040

74,280

Environmental Services

80,693

95,399

84,994

Energy Services

44,748

44,370

46,387

Transportation

78,094

74,526

73,299

Proactiva

5,400

4,823

4,503

Other

1,826

807

609

Consolidated employees*

291,000

297,965

284,072


By category

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Consolidated employees*

284,072

260,088

241,627




F-129



Back to Contents



By Division

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Water

74,280

65,246

62,599

Environmental Services

84,994

78,951

69,012

Energy Services

46,387

42,651

39,429

Transportation

73,299

69,320

66,089

Proactiva

4,503

3,399

4,084

FCC

-

-

-

Other

609

521

414

Consolidated employees*

284,072

260,088

241,627



By company

As of December 31, 2007

As of December 31, 2006

As of December 31, 2005

Fully consolidated companies

241,857

222,634

208,072

Proportionately consolidated companies

42,215

37,454

33,555

Consolidated employees*

284,072

260,088

241,627

    

*

Consolidated employees is equal to the average number of full-time equivalent employees. Employees of proportionately consolidated companies are included in the percentage of consolidation. Employees of equity associates are not included.


By company

As of
December 31,
2009

As of
December 31,
2008(1)

As of
December 31,
2007(1)

Fully consolidated companies

240,657

251,772

241,857

Proportionately consolidated companies

50,343

46,193

42,215

Consolidated employees*

291,000

297,965

284,072


*

Consolidated employees equal the average number of full-time equivalent employees. Employees of proportionately consolidated companies are included according to their percentage of consolidation. Employees of equity associates are not included.

(1)

The information presented for fiscal years 2007 and 2008 includes the employees of entities divested in 2009. In 2007, the average number of employees in the Environmental Services and Transportation Divisions totaled 9,095 and 2,391, respectively, in 2007 and 10,953 and 2,682, respectively, in 2008. Furthermore, the 2007 figures included the employees of the Clemmessy and Crystal entities of the Energy Division that were divested in 2008.


The increasedecrease in the average number of employees in 2007 is mainly2009 was primarily due to the signaturedivestment of new Chinese contracts (average number of employees in 2007 = 1,835) in the Water Division, to the acquisition of the Sulo Group (average number of employees in 2007 = 3,959)VPNM in the Environmental Services Divisiondivision and to SNCM, where employee numbers increased by 1,007 (full year effect),the sale of Freight activity in the Transportation Division.division.


NOTE 42.41

Greenhouse gas emission rightsReporting by operating segment

The rise in greenhouse gases in the atmosphere led certain States and the international community to introduce regulatory provisions to limit further increases. At an international level, the Kyoto protocol, finalized in 1997, came into effect in February 2005, for the period 2008-2012. At a European level, the European Union decided to implement, via Directive 2003/87/EC of October 13, 2003, a trading system for carbon gas emission rights. This trading system came into effect at the beginning of 2005 and covers the period 2008-2012.

In this context,Since January 1, 2009, the Group (primarily the Energy Services Division) was allocated CO2 emission rights by the different Member States of the European Union, covering the 3-year period from 2005 to 2007, known as phase 1.




F-130



Back to Contents


The position in 2007 is as follows:

Volume in thousands of metric tons





As of January 1, 2007

Entries into the consolidation scope

Granted

Purchased / sold

Consumed

As of December 31, 2007

Total

987

203

16,029

(3, 981)

(12,165)

1,073


The balance as of January 1, 2007 takes into account allowances consumed in 2006has identified and surrendered in February 2007.

Entries into the scope of consolidation concern Dalkia acquisitions in Europe.

By optimizing installations and climatic conditions, the Group was able to generate surpluses. It was then able to create value from these surpluses by entering into forward sale transactions and swaps classified as trading transactionspresented segment reporting in accordance with accounting standards.IFRS 8 “Operating segments.”

Note that residual phase 1 rights are estimated at 1,073 thousand metric tons of greenhouse gas emission rightsFinancial reporting by operating segment is governed by the same rules as those used for the condensed consolidated financial statements and described in the Accounting Policies note to the Financial Statements.

This reporting is based on the consumptioninternal organization of 12,165 thousand metric tons of greenhouse gas emission rights in 2007the Group’s activities and that this balance cannot be carried forwardcorresponds to future periods.

Phase II rights (2008-2012) are estimated at €494 million.



NOTE 43.

Segment reporting

Pursuant to IAS 14, Veolia Environnement provides primary information by business segment and secondary information by geographical area. Thethe Group’s four business segments are(which were used for the primary segment reporting under the previous standard – IAS 14) Water, Environmental Services, Energy Services and Transportation.

TheWater segmentintegratessegment integrates drinking water and wastewater activities such as water distribution, water and wastewater treatment, industrial process water, manufacturing of water treatment equipment and systems.

TheEnvironmental Services segment collects, processes and disposes of household, trade and industrial waste.

TheEnergy Services segment includes heatingheat production and distribution, energy optimization and related services, and electricity production.

TheTransportation segment focuses on the operation of passenger transportation services.



F-125



Back to Contents


Pursuant to IFRS 5, Non-Current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations, the results of operations of:

the Clemessy and Crystal entities, in the Energy Services Division, sold in December 2008,

waste-to-energy activity entities in the United States (Montenay International) in the Environmental Services Division and Freight activity entities in the Transportation Division, sold during the second semester of 2009,

activities in the United Kingdom in the Transportation Division and renewable energy activities in the process of being sold

were grouped together in a single line, Net income from discontinued operations, for fiscal year 2009 and fiscal years 2008 and 2007 presented for comparison purposes.


Operating segments

Revenue by segment

(€ million)

Year ended
December 31,
2009

Year ended
December 31,
2008

Year ended
December 31,
2007

Water

12,555.9

12,557.9

10,927.4

Environmental Services

9,055.8

9,972.5

9,057.2

Energy Services

7,078.6

7,446.3

6,200.4

Transportation

5,860.7

5,788.1

5,389.1

Revenue as per the consolidated income statement

34,551.0

35,764.8

31,574.1


Inter-segment revenue

(€ million)

Year ended December 31,
2009

Year ended December 31,2008

Year ended December 31,2007

Water

67.6

36.6

25.5

Environmental Services

93.5

99.8

80.9

Energy Services

53.9

59.7

39.1

Transportation

4.7

4.6

5.2

Inter-segment revenue

219.7

200.7

150.7


Operating income by segment

(€ million)

Year ended December 31,
2009

Year ended December 31,
2008

Year ended December 31,
2007

Water

1164.3

1,198.5

1,267.7

Environmental Services

453.8

265.2

781.8

Energy Services

415.5

434.4

384.3

Transportation

152.9

170.5

130.6

Total operating segments

2,186.5

2,068.6

2,564.4

Unallocated operating income

(166.4)

(107.8)

(103.3)

Operating income as per the consolidated income statement

2,020.1

1,960.8

2,461.1


Operating cash flow before changes in working capital by business segment

(€ million)

Year ended December 31,
2009

Year ended December 31,
2008

Year ended December 31,
2007

Water

1,800.9

1,795.4

1,848.4

Environmental Services

1,194.1

1,357.5

1,456.3

Energy Services

736.9

768.4

656.0

Transportation

311.5

291.8

280.2

Total operating segments

4,043.4

4,213.1

4,240.9

Unallocated operating cash flow before changes in working capital

(104.8)

(34.7)

(21.5)

Operating cash flow before changes in working capital in the consolidated cash flow statement

3,938.6

4,178.4

4,219.4




F-126



Back to Contents



Net charge to operating depreciation, amortization and provisions by segment(*)

(€ million)

Year ended
December 31,
2009

Year ended
December 31,
2008

Year ended
December 31,
2007

Water

(505.3)

(461.7)

(396.0)

Environmental Services

(871.9)

(754.9)

(685.3)

Energy Services

(268.8)

(226.6)

(147.9)

Transportation

(197.1)

(160.1)

(176.9)

Total business segments

(1,843.1)

(1,603.3)

(1,406.1)

Unallocated net charge to operating depreciation, amortization and provisions (**)

(47.9)

(28.7)

(29.3)

Net charge to operating depreciation, amortization and provisions

(1,891.0)

(1,632.0)

(1,435.4)


(*)

including movements in provisions for working capital requirement

(**)

including Proactiva and Artelia


Capital expenditure by segment

(€ million)

Year ended
December 31,
2009

Year ended
December 31,
2008

Year ended
December 31,
2007

Water

835

950

869

Environmental Services

626

990

863

Energy Services

531

539

429

Transportation

445

342

459

Unallocated capital expenditure

56

72

22

Total capital expenditure(1)

2,493

2,893

2,642


(1)

Pursuant to IFRS 8, capital expenditure presented in segment reporting includes investments financed by finance lease in the amount of €28 million, net of the capital expenditure presented in the consolidated cash flow statement.


Assets by segment as of December 31, 2009

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Unallocated amounts

Total
assets in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position

Goodwill, net

2,253.3

2,678.4

1,147.9

537.6

7.4

6,624.6

Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, net

5,836.5

4,167.8

2,492.4

1,669.8

278.5

14,445.0

Operating financial assets

4,059.1

754.5

654.4

105.4

78.4

5,651.8

Working capital assets including DTA

6,504.3

2,772.2

3,590.5

1,269.4

729.7

14,866.1

Total segment assets

18,653.2

10,372.9

7,885.2

3,582.2

1,094.0

41,587.5

Investments in associates

148.1

62.0

55.3

2.9

0.2

268.5

Other unallocated assets(1)

    

7,960.7

7,960.7

Total assets

18,801.3

10,434.9

7,940.5

3,585.1

9,054.9

49,816.7


(1)

including Proactiva and Artelia.




F-127



Back to Contents



Assets by segment as of December 31, 2008

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Unallocated amounts

Total
assets in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position

Goodwill, net

2,247.7

2,736.6

1,131.1

551.4

56.5

6,723.3

Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, net

5,887.6

4,388.0

2,374.7

1,724.8

224.9

14,600.0

Operating financial assets

4,083.2

836.9

679.5

105.5

46.1

5,751.2

Working capital assets including DTA

6,496.8

3,116.4

3,883.3

1,396.7

801.5

15,694.7

Total segment assets

18,715.3

11,077.9

8,068.6

3,778.4

1,129.0

42,769.2

Investments in associates

140.7

81.3

27.7

58.2

3.7

311.6

Other unallocated assets(1)

    

6,045.3 *

6,045.3

Total assets

18,856.0

11,159.2

8,096.3

3,836.6

7,178.0

49,126.1

*

Including assets classified as held for sale of €203.0 million (primarily the reclassification of the assets of certain French subsidiaries under joint control in the Water Division).

(1): including Proactiva and Artelia.


Assets by segment as of December 31, 2007

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Unallocated amounts

Total
assets in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position

Goodwill, net

2,208.2

3,049.5

1,098.1

556.7

0.7

6,913.2

Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, net

5,658.3

4,292.4

2,112.0

1,694.2

141.9

13,898.8

Operating financial assets

3,884.5

902.4

712.3

123.0

5.4

5,627.6

Working capital assets including DTA

5,847.8

3,257.4

3,755.2

1,321.1

585.4

14,766.9

Total segment assets

17,598.8

11,501.7

7,677.6

3,695.0

733.4

41,206.5

Investments in associates

137.2

75.5

25.5

53.9

-

292.1

Other unallocated assets(1)

    

4,808.3 *

4,808.3

Total assets

17,736.0

11,577.2

7,703.1

3,748.9

5,541.7

46,306.9

*

Including assets classified as held for sale of €122.5 million (Transportation Division for €103.9 million and Environmental Services Division for €18.6 million).

(1)

including Proactiva and Artelia.


Liabilities by segment
as of December 31, 2009

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transport-ation

Unallocated amounts

Total
liabilities in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position

Provisions for contingencies and losses

997.3

985.9

494.6

367.3

195.2

3,040.3

Working capital liabilities including DTL

7,670.0

2,615.9

2,878.2

1,558.4

304.4

15,026.9

Other segment liabilities

      

Total segment liabilities

8,667.3

3,601.8

3,372.8

1,925.7

499.6

18,067.2

Other unallocated liabilities(1)

    

31,749.5

31,749.5

Total liabilities

8,667.3

3,601.8

3,372.8

1,925.7

32,249.1

49,816.7

(1)

including Proactiva and Artelia.



F-128



Back to Contents



Liabilities by segment
as of December 31, 2008

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Unallocated amounts

Total
lliabilities in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position

Provisions for contingencies and losses

1,011.1

871.9

468.1

422.4

159.8

2,933.3

Working capital liabilities including DTL

7,599.6

3,056.5

2,956.8

1,598.3

316.5

15,527.8

Other segment liabilities

      

Total segment liabilities

8,610.7

3,928.4

3,424.9

2,020.7

476.4

18,461.1

Other unallocated liabilities(1)

    

30,665.0*

30,665.0

Total liabilities

8,610.7

3,928.4

3,424.9

2,020.7

31,141.4

49,126.1

*

Including liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale of €98.2 million (reclassification of the liabilities of certain French subsidiaries under joint control in the Water Division).

(1)

including Proactiva and Artelia.


Liabilities by segment
as of December 31,
2007

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Unallocated amounts

Total
liabilities in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position

Provisions for contingencies and losses

1,013.9

873.6

476.1

456.7

144.3

2,964.6

Working capital liabilities including DTL

6,855.4

3,138.3

2,996.7

1,544.1

205.0

14,739.5

Other segment liabilities

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total segment liabilities

7,869.3

4,011.9

3,472.8

2,000.8

349.3

17,704.1

Other unallocated liabilities(1)

    

28,602.8 *

28,602.8

Total liabilities

7,869.3

4,011.9

3,472.8

2,000.8

28,952.1

46,306.9

*

Including liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale of €1.9 million (Veolia Environnement SA).

(1)

including Proactiva and Artelia.


Geographical area

December 31, 2009

(€ million)

France

Germany

United
Kingdom

Rest of
Europe

United
States

Oceania

Asia

Middle
East

Rest of
the world

Total

Revenue

13,755.4

2,967.3

2,478.1

6,811.2

2,953.0

1,300.2

1,500.7

1,017.6

1,767.5

34,551.0


December 31, 2008

(€ million)

France

Germany

United
Kingdom

Rest of
Europe

United
States

Oceania

Asia

Middle
East

Rest of
the world

Total

Revenue

14,465.0

3,057.3

2,876.9

7,029.5

2,873.4

1,437.7

1,269.9

1,026.8

1,728.3

35,764.8


December 31,
2007

(€ million)

France

Germany

United
Kingdom

Rest of
Europe

United
States

Oceania

Asia

Middle
East

Rest of
the world

Total

Revenue

13,547.3

2,602.0

2,866.0

6,028.6

2,423.3

1,308.2

961.0

447.0

1,390.7

31,574.1




F-129



Back to Contents


Breakdown of non-current assets (excluding deferred tax assets and non-current derivative instruments) by geographical area

December 31,
2009
(€ million)

France

Germany

United
Kingdom

Rest of
Europe

United
States

Oceania

Asia

Middle
East

Rest of
the world

Total

Total

7,518.0

4,701.6

3,282.0

5,143.7

2,619.9

419.3

2,644.1

264.0

949.2

27,541.8


December 31, 2008
(€ million)

France

Germany

United
Kingdom

Rest of
Europe

United
States

Oceania

Asia

Middle
East

Rest of
the world


Total

Total

7,641.9

4,904.0

3,110.4

5,145.4

2,902.5

344.8

2,456.2

284.5

1,164.2

27,953.9


December 31,
2007
(€ million)

France

Germany

United
Kingdom

Rest of
Europe

United
States

Oceania

Asia

Middle
East

Rest of
the world


Total

Total

7,501.6

5,104.4

3,785.3

4,988.7

2,578.9

372.9

1,767.5

117.3

1,162.0

27,378.6


NOTE 42

Post-balance sheet events

In February 2010, Veolia Environnement announced that it transferred to Covanta Holding Corporation the contract for the operation of the waste-to-energy plant in the County of Miami-Dade. Veolia Environnement has now transferred to Covanta Holding the North American portfolio of waste-to-energy contracts in the Environmental Services Division, the sale of which had been announced on July 6, 2009. This sale totaled US$128 million, pursuant to the stipulated financial terms and conditions.

In connection with its strategic repositioning in the Czech Republic, on January 5, 2010, Dalkia signed an agreement for the acquisition of Energy.As which manages the industrial utilities of the mining group OKD. The completion of this transaction is contingent on receipt of the competition authorizations.

Further to the signature of an agreement with Lyonnaise des Eaux on December 19, 2008, an amendment to the agreement for the unwinding of common subsidiaries between Veolia Eau-CGE and Lyonnaise des Eaux France was signed on February 3, 2010. It resulted in a supplementary control of Société des Eaux de Marseille and of Société des Eaux d’Arles to Veolia Eau-CGE. These transactions were completed on March 22, 2010. The contribution in terms of revenue for 2009 of the subsidiaries disposed were € 150 million and € 136 million for the subsidiaries acquired.

In addition, on March 10, 2010, Veolia Environnement received notices of proposed adjustments (“NOPAs”) from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) relating to a number of tax positions relating to its U.S. subsidiaries, including primarily tax losses resulting from the reorganization of the former US Filter.

The Group believes that its tax positions are well-founded and correct in all material respects. It has already commenced, and intends to pursue, discussions with the IRS to have the positions in the NOPAs modified. The NOPAs are preliminary assessments that do not reflect a definitive audit position and are subject to change. The Group hopes to resolve the issues through discussions with the IRS. If necessary, however, the Group is prepared to defend its tax positions vigorously.

The NOPAs relate to the Worthless Stock Deduction, in the amount of US$4.5 billion (see Note 35), for which a deferred tax asset in the amount of 283 million euros has been recorded (see Note 12). They also relate to certain other issues relating to tax losses for the 2004, 2005 and 2006 tax years, in an aggregate amount of a similar order of magnitude as the Worthless Stock Deduction. Based on a preliminary analysis, Veolia Environnement has not recorded any provisions in its consolidated financial statements in respect of the NOPAs.

Because the NOPAs are still subject to the continuing IRS audit process (see Note 35), there is no requirement at this time for any payment of taxes.



F-130



Back to Contents


NOTE 43

Main companies included in the 2009 consolidated financial statements

In 2009, the Group consolidated or accounted for a total of 2,573 companies, of which the principal companies are:

Company and address

French company registration number
(Siret)

Consolidation method

% control

% interest

Veolia Environnement SA

36-38, avenue Kléber – 75116 Paris

40 321 003 200 047

FC

100.00

100.00

Société d’Environnement et de Services de l’Est SAS

2, rue Annette Bloch – 25200 Montbéliard

44 459 092 100 052

FC

99.99

85.44

EOLFI SA and its subsidiaries

25, place de la Madeleine - 75008 Paris

477 951 644 00020

FC

69.11

69.11

PROACTIVA Medio Ambiete SA

Calle Cardenal Marcelo Spinola 8 – 3A –

28016 Madrid (Spain)

 

PC

50.00

50.00

Veolia Energy North America Holding

1250 Handcock Street Suite 204N Quincy Massachusetts 02169 (United States)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Thermal North America Inc

99 summer street; suite 900

Boston Massachusetts 02110 (United States)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

RIDGELINE ENERGY HOLDING INC

The Nemours Building 1007 Orange Street Suite 1414 Wilmington, DL 19801 (United States)

 

FC

100.00

69.11

Veolia Environnement Europe Services SA

Rue des Deux Eglises 26 B-

1000 Brussels (Belgium)

RPM Bruxelles : BCE 0894.628.426

FC

100.00

100.00

WATER

    

Veolia Eau - Compagnie Générale des Eaux

52, rue d’Anjou – 75008 Paris

57 202 552 600 029

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Water

52, rue d’Anjou – 75008 Paris

42 134 504 200 012

FC

100.00

100.00

Including the following companies in France:

    

Compagnie des Eaux et de l’Ozone

52, rue d’Anjou – 75008 Paris

77 566 736 301 597

FC

100.00

100.00

Société Française de Distribution d’Eau

7, rue Tronson-du-Coudray – 75008 Paris

54 205 494 500 382

FC

99.56

99.56

Compagnie Fermière de Services Publics

3, rue Marcel Sembat – Immeuble CAP 44

44100 Nantes

57 575 016 100 342

FC

99.87

99.87

Compagnie Méditerranéenne d’Exploitation des Services d’Eau – CMESE

12, boulevard René Cassin – 06100 Nice

78 015 329 200 112

FC

99.72

99.72

Société des Eaux de Melun

Zone Industrielle – 198/398, rue Foch

77000 Vaux Le Pénil

78 575 105 800 047

FC

99.29

99.29

Société des Eaux de Marseille

25, rue Edouard Delanglade – BP 29

13254 Marseille

5 780 615 000 017

PC

48.85

48.85


Consolidation method

FC: Full consolidation – PC: Proportionate consolidation – EA: Equity associate




F-131



Back to Contents


Business segments


Revenue by segment

(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Water

10,927.4

10,087.6

9,134.2

Environmental Services

9,214.3

7,462.9

6,748.7

Energy Services

6,896.4

6,118.4

5,463.6

Transportation

5,590.1

4,951.5

4,223.9

Revenue as per the consolidated income statement

32,628.2

28,620.4

25,570.4



Inter-segment revenue

(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Water

25.5

19.4

10.0

Environmental Services

80.9

68.4

55.9

Energy Services

47.6

36.2

29.7

Transportation

5.4

5.9

5.1

Inter-segment revenue

159.4

129.9

100.7



Operating income by segment

(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Water

1,267.7

1,160.6

1,002.3

Environmental Services

803.5

648.3

543.6

Energy Services

398.7

377.7

315.3

Transportation

130.3

13.6

116.8

Total business segments

2,600.2

2,200.2

1,978.0

Unallocated operating income

(103.3)

(67.3)

(85.1)

Operating income as per the consolidated income statement

2,496.9

2,132.9

1,892.9


Company and address

French company registration number
(Siret)

Consolidation method

% control

% interest

WATER

    

Société des Eaux du Nord

217, boulevard de la Liberté – 59800 Lille

57 202 641 700 244

PC

49.55

49.55

Société des Eaux de Versailles et de Saint-Cloud

145, rue Yves le Coz – 78000 Versailles

31 863 464 900 053

PC

50.00

50.00

Sade-Compagnie Générale de Travaux d’Hydraulique (CGTH-SADE) and its subsidiaries

28, rue de la Baume – 75008 Paris

56 207 750 300 018

FC

99.26

99.26

Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies and its subsidiaries l’Aquarène – 1, place Montgolfier

94417 St Maurice Cedex

41 498 621 600 037

FC

100.00

100.00

OTV France

l’Aquarène – 1 place Montgolfier

94417 St Maurice Cedex

433 998 473 000 14

FC

100.00

100.00

Société Internationale de Dessalement (SIDEM)

20-22 rue de Clichy – 75009 Paris

342 500 956 000 12

FC

100.00

100.00

Including the following foreign companies:

    

Veolia Water UK PLC and its subsidiaries

Kings Place – 5th Floor - 90 York Way -

London N19AG (United Kingdom)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Water Central Ltd

Tamblin Way – Hatfield –

Hertfordshire AL109EZ (United Kingdom)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Water North America and its subsidiaries

200 E. Randolph St., Suite 7900

Chicago, IL 60601 (United States)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Wasser GmbH and its subsidiaries

Lindencorso Unter den linden 21

10 117 Berlin (Germany)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Berliner Wasserbetriebe Anstalt des Offentlichen Rechts

Neue Jüdenstrasse 1

10179 Berlin (Germany)

 

PC

49.90

24.95

Braunschweiger Versorgungs- AG &Co.KG

Taubenstrasse 7 D-38 106 Braunschweig (Germany)

 

FC

74.90

74.90

Aquiris SA

Avenue de Vilvorde 450

1130 Brussels (Belgium)

 

FC

99.00

99.00

Apa Nova Bucuresti Srl

Strada Aristide Demetriade nr 2, Sector 1,

Bucarest (Romania)

 

FC

73.69

73.69

Veolia Voda and its subsidiaries

52, rue d’Anjou – 75 008 Paris

434 934 809 00016

FC

83.12

83.12


Consolidation method

FC: Full consolidation – PC: Proportionate consolidation – EA: Equity associate




F-132



Back to Contents



Net charge to operating depreciation, amortization and provisions by segment

(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Water

(396.0)

(436.3)

(420.9)

Environmental Services

(696.8)

(529.4)

(496.4)

Energy Services

(150.2)

(122.9)

(155.4)

Transportation

(189.9)

(293.2)

(160.4)

Total business segments

(1,432.9)

(1,381.8)

(1,233.1)

Unallocated net charge to operating depreciation, amortization and provisions

(29.4)

(28.0)

(59.4)

Net charge to operating depreciation, amortization and provisions

(1,462.3)

(1,409.8)

(1,292.5)



Impairment losses by segment for the year ended December 31, 2007

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Unallocated amounts

Total

Impairment losses recognized in equity

-

-

-

-

-

-

Reversals of impairment losses recognized in equity

-

-

-

-

-

-

Equity impact

-

-

-

-

-

-

Impairment losses recognized in net income

(110.8)

(68.4)

(19.5)

(39.1)

(6.6)

(244.4)

Reversals of impairment losses recognized in net income

105.4

32.6

38.0

12.1

3.3

191.4

Net income impact

(5.4)

(35.8)

18.5

(27.0)

(3.3)

(53.0)



Impairment losses by segment for the year ended December 31, 2006

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Unallocated amounts

Total

Impairment losses recognized in equity

-

-

-

-

-

-

Reversals of impairment losses recognized in equity

-

-

-

-

-

-

Equity impact

-

-

-

-

-

-

Impairment losses recognized in net income

(107.6)

(38.8)

(34.1)

(81.6)

(7.2)

(269.3)

Reversals of impairment losses recognized in net income

74.0

38.7

44.8

8.3

5.5

171.3

Net income impact

(33.6)

(0.1)

10.7

73.3

1.7

(98.0)

Company and address

French company registration number
(Siret)

Consolidation method

% control

% interest

WATER

    

Prazske Vodovody A Kanalizagce As

11 Parizska –

11 000 Prague 1 (Czech Republic)

 

FC

100.00

83.12

Severoceske Vodovody A Kanalizagce As

1 689 Pritkovska

41 550 Teplice (Czech Republic)

 

FC

50.10

41.64

Shenzhen Water (Group) Co. Ltd and its subsidiaries

Water Building, N°1019 Shennan Zhong Road,

518031 SHENZHEN, GuangDong (China)

 

PC

45.00

25.00

Shanghai Pudong Veolia Water Corporation Ltd

No. 703 Pujian Road, Pudong New District,

200127 SHANGHAI (China)

 

PC

50.00

50.00

Changzhou CGE Water Co Ltd

No.12 Juqian Road, CHANGZHOU Municipality, Jiangsu Province, 213000 (China)

 

PC

49.00

24.99

Kunming CGE Water Supply Co Ltd

No. 626 Beijing Road, KUNMING City, Yunnan Province, 650051 (China)

 

PC

49.00

24.99

Veolia Water Korea Co Ltd and its subsidiaries

10F Yeonsei Jaeden Severance Bldg.84-11? Namdaemunno 5-ga, Jung-gu, Seoul, 100-753 (South Korea)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Water Australia and its subsidiaries

Level 4, Bay Center, 65 Pirrama Road, Pyrmont NSW 2009 (Australia)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Société d’Energie et d’Eau du Gabon

Avenue Felix Eboué - BP 2082 – Libreville (Gabon)

 

FC

51.00

41.08

AZALIYA

52, rue d’Anjou 75008 Paris

505 190 801 00017

PC

51.00

51.00

Veolia Water Middle East North Africa

(Veolia Water MENA) and its subsidiaries

52, rue d’Anjou – 75 008 Paris

403 105 919 00019

PC

80.55

41.08

Amendis

23, rue Carnot – 90 000 Tangiers (Morocco)

 

PC

100.00

31.22

REDAL SA

6 Zankat Al Hoceima, BP 161 – 10 000 Rabat (Morocco)

 

PC

100.00

31.91

Lanzhou Veolia Water (Group) Co LTD

No. 2 Hua Gong Street, Xigu District, LANZHOU, Gansu Province, (China)

 

PC

45.00

22.95

Sharqiyah Desalination Co. SAOC

PO Box 685, PC 114 Jibroo, Sultanate of Oman

1 011 277

PC

55.00

28.05

Biothane Systems International Holdings B.V.

Thanthofdreef 21 – PO BOX 5068

2623 EW Delft (Netherlands)

27267973

FC

100.00

100.00


Consolidation method

FC: Full consolidation – PC: Proportionate consolidation – EA: Equity associate




F-133



Back to Contents



Impairment losses by segment for the year ended December 31, 2005

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Unallocated amounts

Total

Impairment losses recognized in equity

-

-

-

-

-

-

Reversals of impairment losses recognized in equity

-

-

-

-

-

-

Equity impact

-

-

-

-

-

-

Impairment losses recognized in net income

(107.5)

(45.4)

(63.9)

(6.0)

(11.6)

(234.4)

Reversals of impairment losses recognized in net income

90.9

42.2

39.5

5.1

6.8

184.5

Net income impact

(16.6)

(3.2)

(24.4)

(0.9)

(4.8)

(49.9)

Company and address

French company registration number
(Siret)

Consolidation method

% control

% interest

WATER

    

Tianjin Jinbin Veolia Water Co

No2 Xinxiang Road, Bridge 4 Jin Tang Expressway, Dongli District, Tianjin Municipality (China)

 

PC

49.00

49.00

Changle Veolia Water Supply Co Ltd

(N°2 Water Plant) Pan Ye Village, Hang Cheng Jie Dao, Changle Municipality, Fujian Province (China)

 

PC

49.00

49.00



Share of net income of associates by segment

(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Water

3.3

3.4

2.4

Environmental Services

3.3

(3.8)

1.6

Energy Services

3.1

2.6

1.9

Transportation

7.2

3.8

0.6

Total business segments

16.9

6.0

6.5

Unallocated share of net income of associates

-

-

-

Share of net income of associates as per the consolidated income statement

16.9

6.0

6.5



Capital expenditure by segment

(€ million)

Year ended December 31, 2007

Year ended December 31, 2006

Year ended December 31, 2005

Water

866.0

853.0

771.0

Environmental Services

846.0

692.0

639.0

Energy Services

429.0

318.0

252.0

Transportation

459.0

302.0

193.0

Total capital expenditure

2,600.0

2,165.0

1,855.0


ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

    

Veolia Propreté

Parc des Fontaines – 163 / 169, avenue Georges Clémenceau - 92000 Nanterre

57 222 103 400 778

FC

100.00

100.00

Société d’Assainissement Rationnel et de Pompage (S.A.R.P.) and its subsidiaries

52 avenue des Champs Pierreux 92000 Nanterre

77 573 481 700 353

FC

100.00

99.55

SARP Industries and its subsidiaries

427, route du Hazay – Zone Portuaire Limay-Porcheville - 78520 Limay

30 377 298 200 029

FC

100.00

99.85

ROUTIERE DE L’EST PARISIEN

ZI Rue Robert Moinon

95190 GOUSSAINVILLE

61 200 696 500 026

FC

100.00

100.00

ONYX AUVERGNE RHONE ALPES

105 avenue du 8 mai 1945

69140 Rilleux-Le-Pape

30 259 089 800 169

FC

100.00

99.99

VALNOR

5, rue de Courtalin - Val d’Europe

77450 MAGNY LE HONGRE

41 030 116 200 302

FC

100.00

100.00

OTUS

26, avenue des Champs Pierreux

92000 NANTERRE

62 205 759 400 336

FC

100.00

100.00

Bartin Recycling Group and its subsidiaries

15 Rue Albert et Paul Thouvenin

18100 VIERZON

48 141 629 500 014

FC

100.00

100.00

Including the following foreign companies:

    

Veolia ES Holding PLC and its subsidiaries

Veolia house – 154A Pentonville Road

N1 9PE – London (United Kingdom)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Environmental Services North America Corp. 200 East Randolph Street – Suite 7900 Chicago – IL 60601 (United States)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia ES Solid Waste, Inc

One Honey Creed Corporate Center – 125 South

84th Street – Suite 200

WI 53214 Milwaukee (United States)

 

FC

100.00

100.00


Consolidation method

FC: Full consolidation – PC: Proportionate consolidation – EA: Equity associate




F-134



Back to Contents



Assets by segment as of December 31, 2007

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Unallocated amounts

Total assets in the consolidated balance sheet

Goodwill, net

2,208.2

3,049.5

1,098.1

556.7

0.7

6,913.2

Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, net

5,658.3

4,292.4

2,112.0

1,694.2

141.9

13,898.8

Operating financial assets

3,884.5

902.4

712.3

123.0

5.4

5,627.6

Working capital assets including DTA

5,847.8

3,257.4

3,755.2

1,321.1

585.4

14,766.9

Total segment assets

17,598.8

11,501.7

7,677.6

3,695.0

733.4

41,206.5

Investments in associates

137.2

75.5

25.5

53.9

-

292.1

Other unallocated assets

 

 

 

 

4,808.3 *

4,808.3

Total assets

17,736.0

11,577.2

7,703.1

3,748.9

5,541.7

46,306.9

*

Including Assets classified as held for sale of €122.5 million (Transportation Division for €103.9 million and Environmental Services Division for €18.6 million).

Company and address

French company
registration number
(Siret)

Consolidation method

% control

% interest

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

    

VES TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS LLC

Butterfield Center

700 East Butterfield Road, #201

60148 LOMBARD (United States)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia ES Industrial Services, Inc

1980 North Highway 146

La Porte 77571 Texas (United States)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

VEOLIA ES CANADA SERVICES INDUSTRIELS INC

1705, 3eme avenue

Canadian Corporate Office - 80 Birmingham Street

L8L 6W5 HAMILTON (Canada)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Environmental Services Australia Pty Ltd

Level 4, Bay Center – 65 Pirrama Road – P.O. Box H126 –NSW 2009 – Pyrmont (Australia)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Environmental Services Asia Pte Ltd

5 Loyang Way 1 – WMX Technologies Building 508706 Singapore

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Environnmental Services China LTD

7/F Allied Kajima Building

138 Gloucester Road – Central - HONG-KONG

 

FC

100.00

100.00

VEOLIA MILJØ AS

Box 567 Skoyen

0214 OSLO (Norway)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Umweltservice GmbH (formerly Sulo)

Hammerbrookstrasse 69

20097 Hamburg (Germany)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Marius Pedersen / Veolia Miljøservice Holding A/S Danemark and its subsidiaries

ørbaekvej49-5863 Ferritsllev (Danemark)

 

FC

65.00

65.00

Veolia Servizi Ambientali SpA (and its subsidiaries)

Via di Monte Brianzo,56 – 00186 Roma-(Italy)

 

FC

100.00

100.00


Consolidation method

FC: Full consolidation – PC: Proportionate consolidation – EA: Equity associate



Assets by segment as of December 31, 2006

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Unallocated amounts

Total assets in the consolidated balance sheet

Goodwill, net

2,029.3

2,294.0

839.2

543.2

(0.7)

5,705.0

Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, net

5,142.5

3,492.1

1,309.5

1,570.0

130.0

11,644.1

Operating financial assets

3,830.5

737.0

771.1

115.4

5.6

5,459.6

Working capital assets including DTA

5,260.3

2,670.9

3,357.7

1,213.2

554.1

13,056.2

Total segment assets

16,262.6

9,194.0

6,277.5

3,441.8

689.0

35,864.9

Investments in associates

130.7

44.4

19.6

46.3

-

241.0

Other unallocated assets

    

4,017.8*

4,017.8

Total assets

16,393.3

9,238.4

6,297.1

3,488.1

4,706.8

40,123.7

*

Including Assets classified as held for sale of €67.3 million (Transportation Division for €42.3 million and Environmental Services Division for €25 million).




F-135



Back to Contents



Assets by segment as of December 31, 2005

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Unallocated amounts

Total assets in the consolidated balance sheet

Goodwill, net

1,942.5

1,527.7

836.3

446.7

(0.9)

4,752.3

Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, net

4,699.0

3,157.7

1,171.5

1,121.0

109.7

10,258.9

Operating financial assets

3,863.3

749.2

822.1

104.4

6.4

5,545.4

Working capital assets including DTA

5,181.4

2,298.1

3,137.6

993.5

243.6

11,854.2

Total segment assets

15,686.2

7,732.7

5,967.5

2,665.6

358.8

32,410.8

Investments in associates

131.4

53.8

10.6

5.7

-

201.5

Other unallocated assets

    

3,768.7*

3,768.7

Total assets

15,817.6

7,786.5

5,978.1

2,671.3

4,127.5

36,381.0

*

Including Assets classified as held for sale of €1.6 million (Environmental Services Division).



Liabilities by segment as of December 31, 2007

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Unallocated amounts

Total liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet

Provisions for contingencies and losses

1,013.9

873.6

476.1

456.7

144.3

2,964.6

Working capital liabilities including DTL

6,855.4

3,138.3

2,996.7

1,544.1

205.0

14,739.5

Other segment liabilities

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total segment liabilities

7,869.3

4,011.9

3,472.8

2,000.8

349.3

17,704.1

Other unallocated liabilities

 

 

 

 

28,602.8 *

28,602.8

Total liabilities

7,869.3

4,011.9

3,472.8

2,000.8

28,952.1

46,306.9

*

Including Liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale of €1.9 million (Veolia Environnement SA).




Company and address

French company
registration number
(Siret)

Consolidation method

% control

% interest

ENERGY SERVICES

    

Dalkia – Saint-André

37, avenue du Mal de Lattre de Tassigny

59350 St André les Lille

40 321 129 500 023

FC

66.00

66.00

Dalkia France

37, avenue du Mal de Lattre de Tassigny

59350 St André les Lille

45 650 053 700 018

FC

99.93

65.96

Dalkia Investissement

37, avenue du Mal de Lattre de Tassigny

59350 St André les Lille

40 443 498 700 073

PC

50.00

33.00

Dalkia International

37, avenue du Mal de Lattre de Tassigny

59350 St André les Lille

43 353 956 600 011

PC

75.81

50.03

Citelum and its subsidiaries

37, rue de Lyon – 75012 Paris

38 964 385 900 019

FC

100.00

65.96

Proxiserve Holding (and its subsidiaries)

7 Rue Troncon du Coudray – 75008 Paris

403 210 875 00015

FC

100.00

82.98

Including the following foreign companies:

    

Dalkia PLC and its subsidiaries

Elizabeth House – 56-60 London Road

Staines TW18 4BQ (United Kingdom)

 

PC

75.81

50.03

Dalkia NV and its subsidiaries

52, quai Fernand Demets

1070 – Anderlecht (Belgium)

 

PC

75.81

50.03

Siram SPA and its subsidiaries

Via Bisceglie, 95 – 20152 Milan (Italy)

 

PC

75.81

50.03

Dalkia Energia Y Servicios and its subsidiaries

Cl Juan Ignacio Luca De tgna, 4

28 027 Madrid (Spain)

 

PC

75.81

50.03

Dalkia GmbH and its subsidiaries

Carl-Ulrich-Strabe 4 – 63263 Neu Isenburg (Germany)

 

PC

75.81

50.03


Consolidation method

FC: Full consolidation – PC: Proportionate consolidation – EA: Equity associate



F-136



Back to Contents



Liabilities by segment as of December 31, 2006

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Unallocated amounts

Total liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet

Provisions for contingencies and losses

1,012.4

791.3

464.0

611.9

142.9

3,022.5

Working capital liabilities including DTL

6,238.8

2,548.9

2,524.1

1,361.0

100.7

12,773.5

Other segment liabilities

273.4

41.6

29.1

12.2

(3.1)

353.2

Total segment liabilities

7,524.6

3,381.8

3,017.2

1,985.1

240.5

16,149.2

Other unallocated liabilities

    

23,974.5*

23,974.5

Total liabilities

7,524.6

3,381.8

3,017.2

1,985.1

24,215.0

40,123.7

*

Including Liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale of €59.4 million (Transportation Division).

Company and address

French company registration number
(Siret)

Consolidation method

% control

% interest

ENERGY SERVICES

    

Dalkia SGPS SA and its subsidiaries

Estrada de Paço d’Arcos 2770 – 129 Paco d’Arços (Portugal)

 

PC

75.81

50.03

Dalkia Limitada and its subsidiaries

Rua Funchal 418 – 14 andar, Vila Olimpia

-60 Sao Paulo SP (Brazil)

 

PC

75.81

50.03

Dalkia Polska and its subsidiaries

Ul Mysia 5 – 00 496 Warsaw (Poland)

 

PC

75.81

32.52

Zespol Elektrocieplownl w Lodzi and its subsidiary

Ul.Jadzi. Andrzejewskiej Street 90-975 Lodz (Poland)

 

PC

75.81

16.59

Dalkia AB and its subsidiaries

Hälsingegatan 47 – 113 31 Stockholm (Sweden)

 

PC

75.81

50.03

Tallinna Kute

Punane 36 13619 Tallinn (Estonia)

 

PC

75.81

48.73

UAB Vilnius Energija

Joconiu St. 13 - 02300 VILNIUS (Lithuania)

 

PC

75.81

50.03

Dalkia Energia Zrt. and its subsidiaries

Budafoki út 91-93 – H-1117 Budapest (Hungary)

 

PC

75.81

49.89

Dalkia a.s and its subsidiaries

Kutlíkova 17 – Technopol

851 02 Bratislava 5 (Slovakia)

 

PC

75.81

50.03

Dalkia Ceska Republika and its subsidiaries

28.řijna 3123/ 152

709 74 Ostrava (Czech Republic)

 

PC

75.81

49.06

PRATERM Group and its subsidiaries

UL B.Czecha 36 - 04-555 Warszawa (Poland)

 

PC

75.81

32.52


TRANSPORTATION

    

VEOLIA TRANSPORT

Parc des Fontaines

163 / 169, avenue Georges Clémenceau

92000 Nanterre

383 607 090 00016

FC

100.00

100.00

Société Nationale Maritime Corse-Méditerranée (SNCM)

61, boulevard des Dames – 13002 Marseille

775 558 463 00011

FC

66.00

66.00

C.F.T.I. (Compagnie Française de Transport Interurbain) Parc des Fontaines
163 / 169, avenue Georges Clémenceau

92000 Nanterre

552 022 063 01075

FC

99.94

99.94

VEOLIA TRANSPORT URBAIN

Parc des Fontaines

163 / 169, avenue Georges Clémenceau

92000 Nanterre

344 379 060 00082

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Eurolines and its subsidiaries
163/169, avenue Georges Clémenceau

92000 Nanterre

434 009 254 00021

FC

100.00

100.00


Consolidation method

FC: Full consolidation – PC: Proportionate consolidation – EA: Equity associate



Liabilities by segment as of December 31, 2005

(€ million)

Water

Environmental Services

Energy Services

Transportation

Unallocated amounts

Total liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet

Provisions for contingencies and losses

1,059.0

575.7

476.1

164.0

127.2

2,402.0

Working capital liabilities including DTL

5,849.4

2,084.3

2,373.2

1,161.4

106.5

11,574.8

Other segment liabilities

289.0

36.9

25.1

8.5

(1.2)

358.3

Total segment liabilities

7,197.4

2,696.9

2,874.4

1,333.9

232.5

14,335.1

Other unallocated liabilities

    

22,045.9

22,045.9

Total liabilities

7,197.4

2,696.9

2,874.4

1,333.9

22,278.4

36,381.0


Geographical area

Geographical breakdown of Revenue

Year ended December 31, 2007

(€ million)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Oceania

Asia

Middle East

Rest of the world

Total

Water

4,927.2

1,276.9

573.4

1,413.0

539.3

299.8

732.8

313.9

851.1

10,927.4

Environmental Services

3,332.0

787.9

1,776.0

993.5

1,315.8

430.7

181.4

63.3

333.7

9,214.3

Energy Services

3,852.2

80.5

473.5

2,159.9

15.3

69.1

42.3

52.5

151.1

6,896.4

Transportation

2,144.5

557.6

122.8

1,466.9

710.0

508.6

4.5

17.3

57.9

5,590.1

Revenue

14,255.9

2,702.9

2,945.7

6,033.3

2,580.4

1,308.2

961.0

447.0

1,393.8

32,628.2



F-137



Back to Contents



Company and address

French company registration number
(Siret)

Consolidation method

% control

% interest

TRANSPORTATION

    

Including the following foreign companies:

    

VEOLIA TRANSPORTATION Inc. and its subsidiaries

8757 Georgia Avenue – Suite 1300 – Silver Pring MD 20910 Baltimore (United States)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Super Shuttle International Inc, and its subsidiaries

14500 N. Northsight boulevard, Suite 329

Scottsdale, AZ 85260 (United States)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

VEOLIA TRANSPORT AUSTRALASIA Pty Ltd and its subsidiaries - Level 24, 1 Spring Street

Melbourne, Victoria 3000 (Australia)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Transport Northern Europe AB and its subsidiaries

Englundavägen 9, Box 1820

SE-171 24 Solna (Sweden)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

VEOLIA TRANSPORT NORD AS

Havnegata 3, Postboks 308

9615 Hammerfest (Norway)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Transport Sverige AB and its subsidiaries

Englundavägen 9, Box 1820

SE-171 24 Solna (Sweden)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

People Travel Group AB

72 Klarabergsviadukten

11 164 Stockholm (Sweden)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Transport Norge AS

Klubbgaten 1 – N 4013 – Stavanger (Norway)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

VEOLIA TRANSPORT UK LTD and its subsidiaries

37-41 Old Queen Street

London SW 1H 9JA, (United Kingdom)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Transport Nederland Holding BV and its subsidiaries

Mastbosstraat 12 - Postbus 3306

4813 GT Breda (Netherlands)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Transport Belgium nv and its subsidiaries

Groenendaallaan 387

2030 Antwerpen (Belgium)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Transport Central Europe GmbH and its subsidiaries

Georgenstrasse 22

10117 Berlin (Germany)

 

FC

100.00

65.00

Veolia Verkehr GmbH and its subsidiaries

Georgenstrasse 22

10117 Berlin (Germany)

 

FC

100.00

100.00

Veolia Transport Ceska Republica a.s.

K Hutim 664/7

198 00 Praha 9 (Czech Republic)

 

FC

100.00

65.00


Consolidation method

FC: Full consolidation – PC: Proportionate consolidation – EA: Equity associate


Year ended December 31, 2006

(€ million)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Oceania

Asia

Rest of the world

Total

Water

4,802.4

1,282.6

552.2

1,279.4

640.8

123.9

578.9

827.4

10,087.6

Environmental Services

3,112.1

151.7

1,135.4

817.2

1,354.2

402.9

167.0

322.4

7,462.9

Energy Services

3,535.4

62.5

426.2

1,899.9

10.3

-

25.0

159.1

6,118.4

Transportation

1,953.1

496.1

73.0

1,321.4

645.0

404.6

-

58.3

4,951.5

Revenue

13,403.0

1,992.9

2,186.8

5,317.9

2,650.3

931.4

770.9

1,367.2

28,620.4



Year ended December 31, 2005

(€ million)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Oceania

Asia

Rest of the world

Total

Water

4,459.4

1,204.5

463.9

1,110.9

581.8

100.5

433.7

779.5

9,134.2

Environmental Services

2,990.1

144.6

861.9

699.9

1,216.4

383.9

146.9

305.0

6,748.7

Energy Services

3,256.5

66.4

367.5

1,657.9

5.0

-

16.7

93.6

5,463.6

Transportation

1,733.2

401.8

33.8

1,239.9

380.1

393.6

-

41.5

4,223.9

Revenue

12,439.2

1,817.3

1,727.1

4,708.6

2,183.3

878.0

597.3

1,219.6

25,570.4


Geographical breakdown of segment assets


As of December 31, 2007

(€ million)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Rest of the world

Total

Water

5,559.2

4,510.0

1,914.7

1,999.6

407.0

3,208.3

17,598.8

Environmental Services

3,396.2

1,337.4

2,380.0

1,819.1

1,806.8

762.2

11,501.7

Energy Services

3,774.9

115.8

232.3

2,678.0

661.8

214.8

7,677.6

Transportation

1,748.5

354.3

116.5

846.8

385.0

243.9

3,695.0

Unallocated amounts

322.0

-

20.3

13.4

249.4

128.3

733.4

Segment assets

14,800.8

6,317.5

4,663.8

7,356.9

3,510.0

4,557.5

41,206.5





F-138



Back to Contents



As of December 31, 2006

(€ million)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Rest of the world

Total

Water

5,145.0

4,427.0

1,706.3

1,769.6

583.3

2,631.4

16,262.6

Environmental Services

3,212.0

89.7

2,503.9

828.5

1,834.1

725.8

9,194.0

Energy Services

3,608.2

87.2

192.2

2,246.5

7.4

136.0

6,277.5

Transportation

1,640.3

348.5

96.6

774.2

354.4

227.8

3,441.8

Segment assets

13,605.5

4,952.4

4,499.0

5,618.8

2,779.2

3,721.0

35,175.9


As of December 31, 2005

(€ million)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Rest of the world

Total

Water

5,137.8

4,430.1

1,574.6

1,429.3

831.8

2,282.6

15,686.2

Environmental Services

3,006.0

87.7

1,247.9

641.0

1,985.0

765.1

7,732.7

Energy Services

3,596.8

64.0

182.6

2,043.1

6.0

75.0

5,967.5

Transportation

995.2

404.0

15.9

801.3

220.4

228.8

2,665.6

Segment assets

12,735.8

4,985.8

3,021.0

4,914.7

3,043.2

3,351.5

32,052.0


NOTE 44

Geographical breakdownAudit fees

Audit fees incurred by the Group during fiscal years 2009, 2008 and 2007 total €50.2 million, €51.7 million and €52.2 million respectively, including €40.2 million in 2009, €40.3 million in 2008 and €37.6 million in 2007 in respect of capital expenditure


Year ended December 31, 2007

(€ million)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Rest of the world

Total

Water

414

28

157

83

22

162

866

Environmental Services

302

36

101

114

196

97

846

Energy Services

239

6

3

136

2

43

429

Transportation

240

28

25

95

22

49

459

Capital expenditure

1,195

98

286

428

242

351

2,600



Year ended December 31, 2006

(€ million)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Rest of the world

Total

Water

412

25

129

92

11

184

853

Environmental Services

285

8

66

88

164

81

692

Energy Services

182

13

6

101

4

12

318

Transportation

132

34

36

76

10

14

302

Capital expenditure

1,011

80

237

357

189

291

2,165


the statutory audit of the accounts and €10.0 million in 2009, €11.4 million in 2008 and €14.6 million in 2007 in respect of services falling within the scope of diligences directly related to the audit engagement.



F-139



Back to Contents





Year ended December 31, 2005

(€ million)

France

Germany

United Kingdom

Rest of Europe

United States

Rest of the world

Total

Water

386

40

79

87

17

162

771

Environmental Services

271

8

114

61

105

80

639

Energy Services

160

1

9

73

2

7

252

Transportation

87

37

1

51

5

12

193

Capital expenditure

904

86

203

272

129

261

1,855



NOTE 44.

Post-balance sheet events


On November 19, 2007, the Environmental Services Division announced the signature of an agreement for the acquisition of the entire share capital of Bartin Recycling Group, a company specializing in the collection and recovery of industrial waste and in particular the recycling of ferrous and non-ferrous metals. This acquisition is consistent with the Environmental Services Division strategy of “turning waste into a resource” and of continuing to develop its waste management activity in the recycling segment. This transaction represents an investment of €147 million for the Environmental Services Division and was finalized on February 13, 2008.

In February 2008, following a takeover bid launched on December 17, 2007, Dalkia became the majority shareholder with a stake of 97.9% in Praterm, a heat production and distribution company in Poland. This transaction enabled Dalkia to strengthen its position in this country, where it already owns two of the largest heating networks in Poznan and Lodz. This transaction represents an investment of €109 million for Dalkia.


NOTE 45.

Main companies included in the 2007 consolidated financial statements

In 2007, the Group consolidated or accounted for a total of 2,535 companies, of which the principal companies are:


Company and address

French company registration number (N° Siret)

Consolidation method

%  interest

Veolia Environnement SA

36-38, avenue Kléber – 75116 Paris

40 321 003 200 047

FC

100.00

Société d’Environnement et de Services de l’Est SAS

2, rue Annette Bloch – 25200 Montbéliard

44 459 092 100 052

FC

80.47

WATER

Veolia Eau - Compagnie Générale des Eaux

52, rue d’Anjou – 75008 Paris

57 202 552 600 029

FC

100.00

Veolia Water

52, rue d’Anjou – 75008 Paris

42 134 504 200 012

FC

100.00




F-140



Back to Contents



Company and address

French company registration number (N° Siret)

Consolidation method

%  interest

Including the following companies in France:

Compagnie des Eaux et de l’Ozone

52, rue d’Anjou – 75008 Paris

77 566 736 301 597

FC

100.00

Compagnie des Eaux de Paris

7, rue Tronson-du-Coudray – 75008 Paris

32 920 774 000 047

FC

100.00

Société Française de Distribution d’Eau

7, rue Tronson-du-Coudray – 75008 Paris

54 205 494 500 069

FC

99.86

Compagnie Fermière de Services Publics

3, rue Marcel Sembat – Immeuble CAP 44 – 44100 Nantes

57 575 016 100 342

FC

99.11

Compagnie Méditerranéenne d’exploitation des Services d’Eau

12, boulevard René Cassin – 06100 Nice

78 015 329 200 112

FC

99.72

Société des Eaux de Melun

Zone Industrielle – 198/398, rue Foch – 77000 Vaux Le Pénil

78 575 105 800 047 

FC

99.28

Société des Eaux de Marseille

25, rue Edouard Delanglade – BP 29 – 13254 Marseille

5 780 615 000 017

PC

48.85

Société des Eaux du Nord

217, boulevard de la Liberté – 59800 Lille

57 202 641 700 244

PC 

49.55

Société des Eaux de Versailles et de Saint-Cloud

145, rue Yves le Coz – 78000 Versailles

31 863 464 900 053

PC

50.00

Sade-Compagnie Générale de Travaux d’Hydraulique and its subsidiaries

28, rue de la Baume – 75008 Paris

56 207 750 300 018

FC

99.03

Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies and its subsidiaries

l’Aquarène – 1, place Montgolfier – 94417 St Maurice Cedex

41 498 621 600 037

FC

100.00

OTV France

l’Aquarène – 1 place Montgolfier – 94410 SAINT MAURICE

433 998 473 000 14

FC

100.00

Société Internationale de Dessalement

54 rue de Clichy – 75009 PARIS

342 500 956 000 12

FC

100.00




F-141



Back to Contents



Company and address

French company registration number (N° Siret)

Consolidation method

%  interest

Including the following foreign companies :

Veolia Water UK Plc and its subsidiaries

37-41 Old Queen Street – London SW1H 9JA (United Kingdom)

FC

100.00

Three Valleys Water Plc

Bishops Rise Hatfield – Hertfordshire AL10 9HL (United Kingdom)

FC

100.00

Veolia Water North America and its subsidiaries

14950 Heathrow Forest Parkway – Suite 200

Houston TX77032 Texas (United States)

FC

100.00

Veolia Wasser GmbH and its subsidiaries

Lindencorso Unter den linden 21 – D 10 117  Berlin (Germany)

FC

100.00

Berliner Wasserbetriebe Anstalt des Offentichen Rechts

Neue Jüdenstrasse 1 – D10179 Berlin Mitte (Germany)

PC

24.95

Braunschweig  Versorgungs AG  GMBH

Taubenstrasse 7 D-38 108 Braunschweig (Germany)

FC

74.90

Aquiris SA

Avenue de Vilvorde 450 - 1130 Brussels (Belgium)

FC

98.50

Apa Nova Bucuresti Srl

Strada Aristide Demetriade nr 2, Sector 1, Bucharest (Romania)

FC

73.69

Veolia Voda and its subsidiaries

52, rue d’Anjou – 75 008 Paris

434 934 809 00016

FC

90.00

Prazske Vodovody A Kanalizagce As

11 Parizska -11 000 Prague 1 (Czech Republic)

FC

90.00

Severoceske Vodovody A Kanalizagce As

1 689 Pritkovska – 41 550 Teplice (Czech Republic)

FC

45.09

Shenzhen Water Group Company Ltd and its subsidiaries

Water Tower, n°1019 Shennan Zhong Road – Shenzhen 518031 (China)

PC

25.00

Shanghai Pudong Veolia Water Corporation Ltd

703 Pujian Road, Pudong New District, 200127 Shanghai (China)

PC

50.00

Changzhou CGE Water Co Ltd

12 Juqian Road – Changzhou  (China)

PC

24.99




F-142



Back to Contents



Company and address

French company registration number (N° Siret)

Consolidation method

%  interest

Kunming CGE Water Supply Co Ltd

No626 Beijing Road - Kunming (China)

PC

24.99

Veolia Water Korea  Co Ltd and its subsidiaries

San 5-1, Kagwa-Ri, Bubal-Eup, Inchon-Shi,

GYONGGI-DO 467-701 (South Korea)

FC

100.00

Veolia Water Australia and its subsidiaries

65 Pirrama Road, Pyrmont NSW 2009 (Australia)

FC

100.00

Société d’Energie et d’Eau du Gabon

Avenue Felix Eboué BP 2187 – Libreville (Gabon)

FC

41.08

Veolia Water AMI and its subsidiaries

52 rue d’Anjou – 75 008 Paris

403 105 919 00019

FC

80.55

Amendis

23 rue Carnot – 90 000 Tangiers (Morocco)

FC

65.25

REDAL  SA

6 Zankat Al Hoceima, BP 161 – 10 000 Rabat (Morocco)

FC

65.59

Lanzhou Veolia Water Co LTD

No 22 Hua Gong Street, Xigu District, Lanzhou, Gansu Province, China

PC

22.95

Sharqiyah Desalination Co. SAOC

PO Box 685, PC 114 Jibroo, Sultanate of Oman

1 011 277

FC

54.81

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

Veolia Propreté

Parc des Fontaines – 163 / 169, avenue Georges Clémenceau

92000 Nanterre

57 222 103 400 778

FC

100.00

Société d’Assainissement Rationnel et de Pompage  (S.A.R.P.) and its subsidiaries

162/166 boulevard de Verdun - Energy Park IV

92413 Courbevoie Cedex

77 573 481 700 353

FC

99.55

SARP Industries and its subsidiaries

427, route du Hazay – Zone Portuaire Limay-Porcheville

78520 Limay

30 377 298 200 029

FC

99.84

Veolia Propreté Nettoyage et Multiservices  and its subsidiaries

132, boulevard de Verdun - Energy Park IV

92400 Courbevoie Cedex

334 516 895 000 11

FC

100.00




F-143



Back to Contents



Company and address

French company registration number (N° Siret)

Consolidation method

%  interest

ROUTIERE DE L'EST PARISIEN

ZI Rue Robert Moinon

95190 GOUSSAINVILLE

61 200 696 500 026

FC

100.00

ONYX AUVERGNE RHONE ALPES

235, Cours Lafayette

69006 LYON

30 259 089 800 169

FC

100.00

VALNOR

5, rue de Courtalin - Val d'Europe

77450 MAGNY LE HONGRE

41 030 116 200 302

FC

100.00

OTUS

26, avenue des Champs Pierreux

92000 NANTERRE

62 205 759 400 336

FC

100.00

Including the following foreign companies :

Veolia ES Holding PLC and its subsidiaries

Veolia house – 154A Pentonville Road

N1 9PE – London (United Kingdom)

FC

100.00

Veolia Environmental Services North America Corp.

700 E. Butterfield road - Suite 201

IL 60148 LOMBARD  (USA)

FC

100.00

Veolia ES Solid Waste, Inc

One Honey Creed Corporate Center – 125 South

84th Street – Suite 200

WI 53214 Milwaukee (USA)

FC

100.00

MONTENAY INTERNATIONAL

One Pennsylvania Plaza - Suite 4400

NY 10119 NEW YORK (USA)

FC

100.00

VES TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS LLC

Butterfield Center – 700 East Butterfield Road, #201

60148 LOMBARD (USA)

FC

100.00

Veolia ES Industrial Services, Inc

1980 North Highway 146

La Porte 77571 Texas (USA)

FC

100.00




F-144



Back to Contents



Company and address

French company registration number (N° Siret)

Consolidation method

%  interest

VEOLIA ES CANADA SERVICES INDUSTRIELS INC

1705, 3eme avenue

Canadian Corporate Office - 80 Birmingham Street

L8L 6W5 HAMILTON (CANADA)

FC

100.00

Veolia Environmental Services Australia Pty Ltd

Level 4, Bay Center – 65 Pirrama Road – P.O. Box H126
–NSW 2009 – Pyrmont (Australia)

FC

100.00

Veolia Environmental Services Asia Pte Ltd

50, Robinson Road – 16-00 Building , Centennial Tower – Singapore

FC

100.00

Veolia Environnmental Services China LTD

7/F Allied Kajima Building

138 Gloucester Road – Central - HONG-KONG

FC

100.00

Marius Pedersen / Veolia Miljøservice Holding A/S – Danemark and its subsidiaries

FC

65.00

VEOLIA MILJØ AS

Box 567 Skoyen

0214 OSLO (NORGE)

FC

100.00


Veolia Environmental Services Belgium NV and its subsidiaries

642 Mechelsesteenweg,

1800 Vilvorde (Belgium)

FC

100.00

Veolia Umweltservice GmbH (ex Sulo)

Am Sandtorkai 75

D-20457 Hamburg

FC

100.00

Veolia Servizi Ambientali SpA and its subsidiaries

Riazza Della Repubblica 7 Milan – 20121 -(Italia)

FC

100.00




F-145



Back to Contents



Company and address

French company registration number (N° Siret)

Consolidation method

%  interest

ENERGY

Dalkia – Saint-André

37, avenue du Mal de Lattre de Tassigny

59350 St André lès Lille

40 321 129 500 023

FC

66.00

Dalkia France

37, avenue du Mal de Lattre de Tassigny

59350 St André lès Lille

45 650 053 700 018

FC

65.96

Dalkia Investissement

37, avenue du Mal de Lattre de Tassigny

59350 St André lès Lille

40 443 498 700 073

PC

33.00

Dalkia International

37, avenue du Mal de Lattre de Tassigny

59350 St André lès Lille

43 353 956 600 011

PC

50.03

Crystal S.A.

28, rue Kleber

92320 Chatillon

32 249 827 000 014

FC

65.95

Citélum and its subsidiaries

37, rue de Lyon – 75012 Paris

38 964 385 900 019 

FC 

65.96 

Proxiserve Holding (and its subsidiaries)

7 Rue Troncon du Coudray – 75008 Paris

403 210 875 00015

FC

82,98

Clemessy and its subsidiaries

18, rue de Thann – 68200 Mulhouse

94 575 213 700 212

FC

65.68

Including the following foreign companies :

Dalkia PLC and its subsidiaries

Elizabeth House – 56-60 London Road – Staines TW18 4BQ

(UK)

PC

50.03

Dalkia NV and its subsidiaries

52, Quai Fernand Demets – 1070 – Anderlecht (Belgium)

PC

50.03

Siram SPA and its subsidiaries

Via Bisceglie, 95 – 20152 Milan (Italia)

PC

50.03

Dalkia Energia Y Servicios and its subsidiaries

Cl Juan Ignacio Luca De tgna, 4 – 28 027 Madrid (Spain)

PC

50.03

Dalkia GmbH and its subsidiaries

Carl-Ulrich-Strabe 4 – 63263 Neu Isenburg (Germany)

PC

50.03




F-146



Back to Contents



Company and address

French company registration number (N° Siret)

Consolidation method

%  interest

Dalkia SGPS SA and its subsidiaries

Estrada de Paço d’Arcos 2780 – 666 Paco d’Arços (Portugal)

PC

50.03

Dalkia Limitada and its subsidiaries

Rua Fidencio Ramos, 223 – 13 andar,  Vila Olimpia

4551-60  Sao Paulo SP (Brazil)

PC

50.03

Dalkia Polska and its subsidiaries

Ul Kruczkowskiego 8 – 00 380 Warsaw (Poland)

PC

32.52

Zespol Elektrocieplownl w Lodzi and its subsidiary

Ul.Jadzi. Andrzejewskiej Street 90-975 Lodz (Poland)

PC

18.37

Dalkia AB and its subsidiaries

Hälsingegatan 47 –  113 31 Stockholm (Sweden)

PC

50.03

Tallinna Kute

Punane 36 13619  Tallinn (Estonia)

PC

50.03

UAB Vilnius Energija

Joconiu St. 13 - 02300 VILNIUS (Lithuania)

PC

50.03

Dalkia Energia Zrt. and its subsidiaries

Budafoki út 91-93  – H-1117 Budapest (Hungary)

PC

49.88

Dalkia a.s and its subsidiaries

Kutlíkova 17 – Technopol –  851 02 Bratislava 5 (Slovakia)

PC

50.03

Dalkia Ceska Republika and its subsidiaries

28.řijna 3123/ 152 – 709 74 Ostrava  (Czech Republic)

PC

49.06

TRANSPORTATION

VEOLIA TRANSPORT

Parc des Fontaines – 163 / 169, avenue Georges Clémenceau

92000 Nanterre

383 607 090 00016

FC

100.00

Société Nationale Maritime Corse-Méditerranée (SNCM)

61 boulevard des Dames – 13002 Marseilles

775 558 463 00011

FC

28.29

C.F.T.I. (Compagnie Française de Transport Interurbain)

Parc des Fontaines - 163 / 169, avenue Georges Clémenceau – 92000 Nanterre

552 022 063 01075

FC

99.88

VEOLIA TRANSPORT URBAIN

Parc des Fontaines – 163 / 169, avenue Georges Clémenceau

92000 Nanterre

344 379 060 00082

FC

100.00




F-147



Back to Contents



Company and address

French company registration number (N° Siret)

Consolidation method

%  interest

Veolia Eurolines and its subsidiaries

163/169, avenue Georges Clémenceau - 92000 Nanterre

434 009 254 00021

FC

99.97

Veolia Cargo

169, avenue Georges Clemenceau – 92000 Nanterre

444 413 942 00012 

FC

100.00

Including the following foreign companies:

VEOLIA TRANSPORTATION Inc. and its subsidiaries

8757 Georgia Avenue – Suite 1300 – Silver Spring MD 20910

Baltimore (USA)

FC

100.00

Super Shuttle International Inc, and its subsidiaries

14500 N. Northsight Boulevard, Suite 329

Scottsdale, AZ 85260 (USA)

FC

81.00

VEOLIA TRANSPORT AUSTRALASIA P/L and its subsidiaries

Level 24, 1 Spring Street

Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia

FC

100.00

Connex Melbourne Pty Ltd

1 Spring Street

Melbourne, Victoria 3001, Australia

FC

100.00

Veolia Transport Northern Europe AB and its subsidiaries

Englundavägen 9, Box 1820

SE-171 24 Solna (Sweden)

FC

100.00

VEOLIA TRANSPORT NORD AS

Havnegata 3, Postboks 308

9615 Hammerfest (Norway)

FC

100.00

Veolia Transport Sverige AB and its subsidiaries

Englundavägen 9, Box 1820

SE-171 24 Solna (Sweden)

FC

100.00

People Travel Group AB

72 Klarabergsviadukten

11 164 Stockholm (Sweden)

FC

100.00

Veolia Transport Norge AS

Klubbgaten 1 – N 4013 – Stavanger (Norway)

FC

100.00

VEOLIA TRANSPORT UK LTD and its subsidiaries

37-41 Old Queen Street

London SW 1H 9JA, (United Kingdom)

FC

100.00



F-148



Back to Contents



Company and address

French company registration number (N° Siret)

Consolidation method

%  interest

Veolia Transport Nederland Holdings BV and its subsidiaries

Mastbosstraat 12 - Postbus 3306

4813 GT Breda

FC

100.00

Veolia Transport Belgium nv and its subsidiaries

Groenendaallaan 387

2030 Antwerp

FC

100.00

Veolia Transport Central Europe GmbH and its subsidiaries

Georgenstrasse 22

10117 Berlin

FC

65.00

Veolia Verkehr GmbH and its subsidiaries

Georgenstrasse 22

10117 Berlin

FC

100.00

Veolia Transport Ceska Republica a.s.

K Hutim 664/7

198 00 Praha 9 (Czech Republic)

FC

65.00

PROACTIVA Medio Ambiete SA

Calle Cardenal Marcelo Spinola 8 – 3a – 28016 Madrid (Spain)

PC

50.00

Veolia Energy North America Holding

1250 Hancock Street, Suite 204N Quincy Massachusetts 02169

FC

100.00

Thermal North America Inc

99 Summer Street, Suite 900 Boston Massachusetts 02110

FC

100.00


Consolidation method

FC: Full consolidation – PC: Proportionate consolidation – EA: Equity associate




F-149



Back to Contents


SIGNATURES


The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.


 

VEOLIA ENVIRONNEMENT

   
 

By:

/s/ Jérôme ContamineAntoine Frérot

 

Name:

Name: Jérôme ContamineAntoine Frérot

 

Title:

Title: SeniorChief Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date: May 7, 2008April 19, 2010





F-140



Back to Contents


EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit

Number

Description


1

Articles of Association (statuts) of Veolia Environnement (free English translation).


8

List of Subsidiaries. Included herein in Note 45 to our consolidated financial statements.


11

Code of Ethics (previously filed as Exhibit 11 to our annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 and incorporated by reference herein).


12.1

Certifications by Henri Proglio, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Jérôme Contamine, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


13.1

Certifications by Henri Proglio, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Jérôme Contamine, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


15.1

Excerpt of report of the Chairman of the Board of Directors for 2007 as required by Art. 117 of the French Financial Security Law (Loi de Sécurité Financière) (free English translation)


15.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms.