UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549
————————————————————
Form 20-F

(Mark One)

 

REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) or (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

 ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 200
89

OR

 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _____ to _____

OR

 SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Date of event requiring this shell company report

Commission file number: 1-14090
Eni SpA
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Republic of Italy
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
1, piazzale Enrico Mattei
- 00144 Roma
- Italy

(Address of principal executive offices)
Alessandro Bernini
Eni SpA
1, piazza Ezio Vanoni
20097 San Donato Milanese
20097 Milano
(Milano) - Italy
Tel +39 02 52041730
- Fax +39 02 52041765
(Name, Telephone, Email and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)
————————————————————
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.

Title of each class

  

Name of each exchange on which registered

Shares
American Depositary Shares

  

New York Stock Exchange*
New York Stock Exchange

(Which represent the right to receive two Shares)

  * Not for trading, but only in connection with the registration of American Depositary Shares, pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
None

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.
                                        Ordinary shares of euro 1.00 each                                                                                                                                                                 4,005,358,876

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes 

   

 No 

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Yes 

   

 No 

Note - Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under those Sections.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Note - Checking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under those Sections.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes 

   

 No 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes 

 No 


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant have submitted electronically and posted on their corporate Web sites, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).*

Yes 

 No 

* This requirement does not apply to the registrants until their fiscal year ending December 31, 2011.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:


Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

U.S. GAAP

International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board

Other

If "Other" has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.


If "Other" has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

Item 17

   

 Item 18

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).


If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes 

   

 No 


TABLE OF CONTENTS
iiPage
Certain Defined Termsiii
Presentation of Financial and Other Informationiii
Statements Regarding Competitive Positioniii
Glossaryiiii
Abbreviations and Conversion Tableivi
iiIiIiIiIIIi
PART Iiii
PART IIIIIIII
Item 1.iIIDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORSiI1
Item 2.iIOFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLEiI1
Item 3.iIKEY INFORMATIONiI1
iIiISelected Financial InformationiI1
iIiISelected Operating InformationiI3
iIiIExchange RatesiI5
iIiIRisk FactorsiI5
Item 4.iIINFORMATION ON THE COMPANYiI1720
iIiIHistory and Development of the CompanyiI1720
iIiIBusiness OverviewiI2125
iIiIExploration & ProductioniI2125
iIiIGas & PoweriI5052
iIiIRefining & MarketingiI6268
iIiIEngineering & ConstructioniI6976
iIiIPetrochemicalsiI7179
iIiICorporate and Other activitiesiI7381
iIiIResearch and DevelopmentiI7481
iIiIInsuranceiI7481
iIiIEnvironmental MattersiI7482
iIiIRegulation of Eni’s BusinessesiI7986
iIiIProperty, Plant and EquipmentiI8897
iIiIOrganizational StructureiI8897
Item 4A.iIUNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTSiI8898
Item 5.iIOPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTSiI8898
iIiIExecutive SummaryiI8998
iIiICritical Accounting EstimatesiI91100
iIiI2006-20082007-2009 Group Results of OperationsiI95104
iIiILiquidity and Capital ResourcesiI105114
iIiIRecent DevelopmentsiI111120
iIiIManagement’s Expectations of OperationsiI113122
Item 6.iIDIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEESiI118128
iIiIDirectors and Senior ManagementiI118128
iIiICompensationI132
IIBoard PracticesiI122139
iIiICompensationEmployeesiI130143
iIiEmployeesi137
iiiiIShare OwnershipiI138144
Item 7.iIMAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONSiI139145
iIiIMajor ShareholdersiI139145
iIiIRelated Party TransactionsiI139145
Item 8.iIFINANCIAL INFORMATIONiI139146
iIiIConsolidated Statements and Other Financial InformationiI139146
iIiISignificant ChangesiI148146
Item 9.iITHE OFFER AND THE LISTINGiI148146
iIiIOffer and Listing DetailsiI148146
iIiIMarketsiI149148
Item 10.iIADDITIONAL INFORMATIONiI150149
iIiIMemorandum and Articles of AssociationiI150149
iIiIMaterial ContractsiI156154
iIiIExchange ControlsI154
IITaxationI155
IIDocuments on DisplayiI157159
iiExchange Controlsi157
iiTaxationi157
Item 11.iIQUALITATIVEQUANTITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVEQUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKiI161159
Item 12.iIDESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIESiI161160
i12A.iIiDebt SecuritiesiIi160
12B.IWarrants and RightsI160
12C.IOther SecuritiesI160
12D.IAmerican Depositary SharesI160
IIIIIII
PART IIiIiIiIiI
Item 13.iIDEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIESiI162
Item 14.iIMATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDSiI162
Item 15.iICONTROLS AND PROCEDURESiI162
Item 16.iIIiIII
16A.iIBoard of Statutory Auditors Financial ExpertiI163
16B.iICode of EthicsiI163
16C.iIPrincipal Accountant Fees and ServicesiI163
16D.iIExemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit CommitteesiI164
16E.iIPurchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasersi164
16GiCorporate Governance PracticesiI165
i16F.iiIiChange in Registrant's Certifying AccountantiIi165
16G.ISignificant Differences in Corporate Governance Practices as per Section 303A.11 of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company ManualI165
IIIIIII
PART IIIiIiIiIIiII
Item 17.iIFINANCIAL STATEMENTSiI168
Item 18.iIFINANCIAL STATEMENTSiI168
Item 19.iIEXHIBITSiI168

i


Certain disclosures contained herein including, without limitation, information appearing in "Item 4 – Information on the Company", and in particular "Item 4 – Exploration & Production", “Item"Item 5 – Operating and Financial Review and Prospects”Prospects" and "Item 11 – Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures about Market Risk" contain forward-looking statements regarding future events and the future results of Eni that are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts, and projections about the industries in which Eni operates and the beliefs and assumptions of the management of Eni. Eni may also make forward-looking statements in other written materials, including other documents filed with or furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). In addition, Eni’s senior management may make forward-looking statements orally to analysts, investors, representatives of the media and others. In particular, among other statements, certain statements with regard to management objectives, trends in results of operations, margins, costs, return on capital, risk management and competition are forward looking in nature. Words such as ‘expects’, ‘anticipates’, ‘targets’, ‘goals’, ‘projects’, ‘intends’, ‘plans’, ‘believes’, ‘seeks’, ‘estimates’, variations of such words, and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are difficult to predict because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that will occur in the future. Therefore, Eni’s actual results may differ materially and adversely from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in this Annual Report on Form 20-F under the section entitled "Risk Factors" and elsewhere. Any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of Eni speak only as of the date they are made. Eni does not undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect any changes in Eni’s expectations with regard thereto or any changes in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based. The reader should, however, consult any further disclosures Eni may make in documents it files with the SEC.

 

CERTAIN DEFINED TERMS

In this Form 20-F, the terms "Eni", the "Group", or the "Company" refer to the parent company Eni SpA and its consolidated subsidiaries and, unless the context otherwise requires, their respective predecessor companies. All references to "Italy" or the "State" are references to the Republic of Italy, all references to the "Government" are references to the government of the Republic of Italy. For definitions of certain oil and gas terms used herein and certain conversions, see "Glossary" and "Conversion Table".

 

PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION

The Consolidated Financial Statements of Eni, included in this annual report, have been prepared in accordance with IFRS issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).

Unless otherwise indicated, any reference herein to "Consolidated Financial Statements" is to the Consolidated Financial Statements of Eni (including the Notes thereto) included herein.

Unless otherwise specified or the context otherwise requires, references herein to "dollars", "$", "U.S. dollars" and "U.S. $" are to the currency of the United States, and references to "euro" and "€" are to the currency of the European Monetary Union.

Unless otherwise specified or the context otherwise requires, references herein to "division" and "segment" are to Eni’s business activities: Exploration & Production, Gas & Power, Refining & Marketing, Engineering & Construction, Petrochemicals and other activities.

 

STATEMENTS REGARDING COMPETITIVE POSITION

Statements made in "Item 4 – Information on the Company" referring to Eni’s competitive position are based on the Company’s belief, and in some cases rely on a range of sources, including investment analysts’ reports, independent market studies and Eni’s internal assessment of market share based on publicly available information about the financial results and performance of market participants. Market share estimates contained in this document are based on management estimates unless otherwise indicated.

 

ii


GLOSSARY

A glossary of oil and gas terms is available on Eni’s web page at the address www.eni.it.www.eni.com. Below is a selection of the most frequently used terms.

Financial terms

  
         
Leverage A non-GAAP measure of the Company’s financial condition, calculated as the ratio between net borrowings and shareholders’ equity, including minority interest. For a discussion of management’s view of the usefulness of this measure and its reconciliation with the most directly comparable GAAP measure which in the case of the Company refers to IFRS, see "Item 5 – Financial Condition".
         
Net borrowings Eni evaluates its financial condition by reference to "net borrowings", which is a non-GAAP measure. Eni calculates net borrowings as total finance debt less: cash, cash equivalents and certain very liquid investments not related to operations, including among others non-operating financing receivables and securities not related to operations. Non-operating financing receivables consist of amounts due to Eni’s financing subsidiaries from banks and other financing institutions and amounts due to other subsidiaries from banks for investing purposes and deposits in escrow. Securities not related to operations consist primarily of government and corporate securities. For a discussion of management’s view of the usefulness of this measure and its reconciliation with the most directly comparable GAAP measure which in the case of the Company refers to IFRS, see "Item 5 – Financial Condition".
         
TSR (Total
(Total Shareholder Return)
 Management uses this measure to asses the total return of the Eni share. It is calculated on a yearly basis, keeping account of changes in prices (beginning and end of year) and dividends distributed and reinvested at the ex-dividend date.
   

Business terms

  
   
AEEG (Authority for
Electricity and Gas)
The Regulatory Authority for Electricity and Gas is the Italian independent body which regulates, controls and monitors the electricity and gas sectors and markets in Italy. The Authority’s role and purpose is to protect the interests of users and consumers, promote competition and ensure efficient, cost-effective and profitable nationwide services with satisfactory quality levels.
Associated gas NaturalAssociated gas occurringis a natural gas found in contact with or dissolved in crude oil in the form of a gas cap, overlying an oil zone, contained in the reservoir’s crude oil gas.reservoir. It can be further categorized as Gas-Cap Gas or Solution Gas.
         
Average reserve life index Ratio between the amount of reserves at the end of the year and total production for the year.
         
Barrel/BBL Volume unit corresponding to 159 liters. A barrel of oil corresponds to about 0.137 metric tons.
         
BOE Barrel of Oil Equivalent. It is used as a standard unit measure for oil and natural gas. The latter is converted from standard cubic meters into barrels of oil equivalent using a certain coefficient (see "Conversion Table").
         
Concession contracts Contracts currently applied mainly in Western countries regulating relationships between states and oil companies with regards to hydrocarbon exploration and production. The company holding the mining concession has an exclusive on exploration, development and production activities and for this reason it acquires a right to hydrocarbons extracted against the payment of royalties on production and taxes on oil revenues to the state.
         
Condensates These are lightCondensates is a mixture of hydrocarbons that exists in the gaseous phase at original reservoir temperature and pressure, but that, when produced, along with gas that condense to ais in the liquid statephase at surface temperaturepressure and pressure.temperature.
         
Contingent resourcesContingent resources are those quantities of petroleum estimated, as of a given date, to be potentially recoverable from known accumulations, but the applied project(s) are not yet considered mature enough for commercial development due to one or more contingencies.
Conversion capacity Maximum amount of feedstock that can be processed in certain dedicated facilities of a refinery to obtain finished products. Conversion facilities include catalytic crackers, hydrocrackers, visbreaking units, and coking units.
         

iii


Conversion index Ratio of capacity of conversion facilities to primary distillation capacity. The higher the ratio, the higher is the capacity of a refinery to obtain high value products from the heavy residue of primary distillation.
         
Deep waters Waters deeper than 200 meters.
         
Development Drilling and other post-exploration activities aimed at the production of oil and gas.

iii


Enhanced recovery Techniques used to increase or stretch over time the production of wells.
         
EPC Engineering, Procurement and Construction.
         
EPIC Engineering, Procurement, Installation and Construction.
         
Exploration Oil and natural gas exploration that includes land surveys, geological and geophysical studies, seismic data gathering and analysis and well drilling.
         
FPSO Floating Production Storage and Offloading System.
         
FSO Floating Storage and Offloading System.
         
Infilling wells Infilling wells are wells drilled in a producing area in order to improve the recovery of hydrocarbons from the field and to maintain and/or increase production levels.
         
LNG Liquefied Natural Gas obtained through the cooling of natural gas to minus 160 °C at normal pressure. The gas is liquefied to allow transportation from the place of extraction to the sites at which it is transformed back into its natural gaseous state and consumed. One tonne of LNG corresponds to 1,400 cubic meters of gas.
         
LPG Liquefied Petroleum Gas, a mix of light petroleum fractions, gaseous at normal pressure and easily liquefied at room temperature through limited compression.
         
Margin The difference between the average selling price and direct acquisition cost of a finished product or raw material excluding other production costs (e.g. refining margin, margin on distribution of natural gas and petroleum products or margin of petrochemical products). Margin trends reflect the trading environment and are, to a certain extent, a gauge of industry profitability.
         
Mineral Potential(Potentially recoverable hydrocarbon volumes) Estimated recoverable volumes which cannot be defined as reserves due to a number of reasons, such as the temporary lack of viable markets, a possible commercial recovery dependent on the development of new technologies, or for their location in accumulations yet to be developed or where evaluation of known accumulations is still at an early stage.
Mineral Storage According to Legislative Decree No. 164/2000, these are volumes required for allowing optimal operation of natural gas fields in Italy for technical and economic reasons. The purpose is to ensure production flexibility as required by long-term purchase contracts as well as to cover technical risks associated with production.
         
Modulation Storage According to Legislative Decree No. 164/2000, these are volumes required for meeting hourly, daily and seasonal swings in demand.
         
Natural gas liquids (NGL) Liquid or liquefied hydrocarbons recovered from natural gas through separation equipment or natural gas treatment plants. Propane, normal-butane and isobutane, isopentane and pentane plus, that were previously defined as natural gasoline, are natural gas liquids.
         
Network Code A code containing norms and regulations for access to, management and operation of natural gas pipelines.
         
Over/Under lifting Agreements stipulated between partners which regulate the right of each to its share in the production for a set period of time. Amounts lifted by a partner different from the agreed amounts determine temporary Over/Under lifting situations.
Possible reservesPossible reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than probable reserves.
Probable reservesProbable reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves but which, together with proved reserves, are as likely as not to be recovered.
         
Primary balanced refining capacity Maximum amount of feedstock that can be processed in a refinery to obtain finished products measured in BBL/d.
         

iv


Production Sharing Agreement ("PSA") Contract in use in African, Middle Eastern, Far Eastern and Latin American countries, among others, regulating relationships between states and oil companies with regard to the exploration and production of hydrocarbons. The mineral right is awarded to the national oil company jointly with the foreign oil company that has an exclusive right to perform exploration, development and production activities and can enter into agreements with other local or international entities. In this type of contract the national oil company assigns to the international contractor the task of performing exploration and production with the contractor’s equipment and financial resources. Exploration risks are borne by the contractor and production is divided into two portions: "cost oil" is used to recover costs borne by the contractor and "profit oil" is divided between the contractor and the national company according to variable schemes and represents the profit deriving from exploration and production. Further terms and conditions of these contracts may vary from country to country.

iv


Proved reserves Proved oil and gas reserves are the estimatedthose quantities of crude oil naturaland gas, and natural gas liquids which, geologicalby analysis of geoscience and engineering data, demonstratecan be estimated with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future yearseconomically producible, from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods, and operatinggovernment regulations, prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the estimation. The project to extract the hydrocarbons must have commenced or the operator must be reasonably certain that it will commence the project within a reasonable time. Existing economic conditions i.e.,include prices and costs asat which economic producibility from a reservoir is to be determined. The price shall be the average price during the 12-month period prior to the ending date of the dateperiod covered by the estimate is made. Prices include considerationreport, determined as an unweighted arithmetic average of the impact of changes in existingfirst-day-of-the-month price for each month within such period, unless prices on existingare defined by contractual arrangements, but not onexcluding escalations based upon future conditions. Reserves are classified as either developed and undeveloped. Proved developed oil and gas reserves include: (i) proved developed reserves: amountsare reserves that can be expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods or in which the cost of hydrocarbonsthe required equipment is relatively minor compared to the cost of a new well, and through installed extraction equipment and infrastructure operational at the time of the reserves estimate if the extraction is by means not involving a well. Proved undeveloped oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that are expected to be retrieved throughrecovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells facilitieswhere a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion.
ReservesReserves are estimated remaining quantities of oil and operating methods;gas and (ii) non-developed proved reserves: amounts of hydrocarbons that are expectedrelated substances anticipated to be retrieved following new drilling, facilitieseconomically producible, as of a given date, by application of development projects to known accumulations. In addition, there must exist, or there must be a reasonable expectation that there will exist, the legal right to produce or a revenue interest in the production, installed means of delivering oil and operating methods. Based on these amountsgas or related substances to market, and all permits and financing required to implement the company has already defined a clear development expenditure program which is an expression of the company’s determination to develop existing reserves.project.
         
Reserve life index Ratio between the amount of proved reserves at the end of the year and total production for the year.
         
Reserve replacement ratio Measure of the reserves produced replaced by proved reserves. Indicates the company’s ability to add new reserves through exploration and purchase of property. A rate higher than 100% indicates that more reserves were added than produced in the period. The ratio should be averaged on a three-year period in order to reduce the distortion deriving from the purchase of proved property, the revision of previous estimates, enhanced recovery, improvement in recovery rates and changes in the amount of reserves – in PSAs – due to changes in international oil prices.
         
Ship-or-pay Clause included in natural gas transportation contracts according to which the customer is requested to pay for the transportation of gas whether or not the gas is actually transported.
         
Strategic Storage According to Legislative Decree No. 164/2000, these are volumes required for covering lack or reduction of supplies from extra-European sources or crises in the natural gas system.
         

v


Take-or-pay Clause included in natural gas supply contracts according to which the purchaser is bound to pay the contractual price or a fraction of such price for a minimum quantity of gas set in the contract whether or not the gas is collected by the purchaser. The purchaser has the option of collecting the gas paid for and not delivered at a price equal to the residual fraction of the price set in the contract in subsequent contract years.
         
Upstream/Downstream The term upstream refers to all hydrocarbon exploration and production activities. The term downstream includes all activities inherent to the oil and gas sector that are downstream of exploration and production activities.

 

v


ABBREVIATIONS

mmCF=million cubic feet ktonnes=thousand tonnes
                     
BCF=billion cubic feet mmtonnes=million tonnes
                     
mmCM=million cubic meters MW=megawatt
                     
BCM=billion cubic meters GWh=gigawatthour
                     
BOE=barrel of oil equivalent TWh=terawatthour
                     
KBOE=thousand barrel of oil equivalent /d=per day
                     
mmBOE=million barrel of oil equivalent /y=per year
                     
BBOE=billion barrel of oil equivalent E&P=the Exploration & Production segment
                     
BBL=barrels G&P=the Gas & Power segment
                     
KBBL=thousand barrels R&M=the Refining & Marketing segment
                     
mmBBL=million barrels E&C=the Engineering & Construction segment
                     
BBBL=billion barrels    

 

CONVERSION TABLE

1 acre

=

0.405 hectares  
               
1 barrel

=

42 U.S. gallons  
               
1 BOE

=

1 barrel of crude oil

=

5,742 cubic feet of natural gas
               
1 barrel of crude oil per day

=

approximately 50 tonnes of crude oil per year  
               
1 cubic meter of natural gas

=

35.3147 cubic feet of natural gas  
               
1 cubic meter of natural gas

=

approximately 0.00615 barrels of oil equivalent  
               
1 kilometer

=

approximately 0.62 miles  
               
1 short ton

=

0.907 tonnes

=

2,000 pounds
               
1 long ton

=

1.016 tonnes

=

2,240 pounds
               
1 tonne

=

1 metric ton

=

1,000 kilograms
   

=

approximately 2,205 pounds
               
1 tonne of crude oil

=

1 metric ton of crude oil

=

approximately 7.3 barrels of crude oil (assuming an API gravity of 34 degrees)

vi


PART I

Item 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISORS

NOT APPLICABLE

 

Item 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE

NOT APPLICABLE

 

Item 3. KEY INFORMATION

Selected Financial InformationInformation

The Consolidated Financial Statements of Eni have been prepared in accordance with IFRS issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). The tables below show Eni selected historical financial data prepared in accordance with IFRS as of and for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2008.2009. The selected historical financial data for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008presented herein are derived from Eni’s Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 18.

All such data should be read in connection with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes thereto included in Item 18.

 

Year ended December 31,

 
 

2004

 

2005

 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

 
 
 
 
 
 

2005

 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

 
 
 
 
 
 (euro million except data per share and per ADR)
CONSOLIDATED PROFIT STATEMENT DATA                      
Net sales from operations 57,545 73,728 86,105 87,256 108,148  73,728 86,105 87,204 108,082 83,227 
Operating profit by segment(1)                      
Exploration & Production 8,185 12,592 15,580 13,788 16,415  12,592 15,580 13,433 16,239 9,120 
Gas & Power 3,428 3,321 3,802 4,127 3,933  3,321 3,802 4,465 4,030 3,687 
Refining & Marketing 1,080 1,857 319 729 (1,023) 1,857 319 686 (988) (102)
Petrochemicals 320 202 172 74 (822) 202 172 100 (845) (675)
Engineering & Construction 203 307 505 837 1,045  307 505 837 1,045 881 
Other activities (395) (934) (622) (444) (346) (934) (622) (444) (346) (382)
Corporate and financial companies (363) (377) (296) (217) (686) (377) (296) (312) (743) (474)
Impact of unrealized intragroup profit elimination (1)(2) (59) (141) (133) (26) 125  (141) (133) (26) 125   
Operating profit 12,399 16,827 19,327 18,868 18,641  16,827 19,327 18,739 18,517 12,055 
Net profit attributable to Eni 7,059 8,788 9,217 10,011 8,825  8,788 9,217 10,011 8,825 4,367 
Data per ordinary share (euro) (2)(3)                      
Operating profit:                      
- basic 3.29 4.48 5.23 5.14 5.12  4.48 5.23 5.11 5.09 3.33 
- diluted 3.28 4.47 5.22 5.14 5.12  4.47 5.22 5.11 5.09 3.33 
Net profit attributable to Eni basic and diluted 1.87 2.34 2.49 2.73 2.43  2.34 2.49 2.73 2.43 1.21 
Data per ADR ($) (2) (3)           
Data per ADR ($) (3) (4)           
Operating profit:                      
- basic 8.18 11.14 13.13 14.10 15.07  11.14 13.13 14.01 14.97 9.27 
- diluted 8.17 11.12 13.12 14.10 15.07  11.12 13.12 14.00 14.97 9.27 
Net profit attributable to Eni basic and diluted 4.66 5.82 6.26 7.48 7.14  5.82 6.26 7.48 7.14 3.36 
 
 
 
 
 

1


 

As of December 31,

 
 

2004

 

2005

 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

 
 
 
 
 
 

2005

 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

 
 
 
 
 
 

(euro million except number of shares and dividend information)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA          
Total assets 72,853 83,850 88,312 101,460 116,590
Short-term and long-term debt 12,684 12,998 11,699 19,830 20,837
Capital stock issued 4,004 4,005 4,005 4,005 4,005
Minority interest 3,166 2,349 2,170 2,439 4,074
Shareholders’ equity - Eni share 32,374 36,868 39,029 40,428 44,436
Capital expenditures 7,499 7,414 7,833 10,593 14,562
Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding (fully diluted - shares million) 3,775 3,763 3,701 3,669 3,639
Dividend per share (euro) 0.90 1.10 1.25 1.30 1.30
Dividend per ADR ($) (2) 2.17 2.73 3.24 3.74 3.72





CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA          
Total assets 83,850 88,312 101,460 116,673 117,529
Short-term and long-term debt 12,998 11,699 19,830 20,837 24,800
Capital stock issued 4,005 4,005 4,005 4,005 4,005
Minority interest 2,349 2,170 2,439 4,074 3,978
Shareholders’ equity - Eni share 36,868 39,029 40,428 44,436 46,073
Capital expenditures 7,414 7,833 10,593 14,562 13,695
Weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding (fully diluted - shares million) 3,763 3,701 3,668 3,639 3,622
Dividend per share (euro) 1.10 1.25 1.30 1.30 1.00
Dividend per ADR ($) (3) 2.73 3.24 3.74 3.72 2.91
  
 
 
 
 

(1)iFrom 2009, gains and losses on non-hedging commodity derivative instruments, including both fair value re-measurement and settled transactions are reported as items of operating profit. Also results of the gas storage business are reported within the Gas & Power segment reporting unit, as part of the regulated businesses results, following the restructuring of Eni’s regulated gas businesses in Italy. In past years, results of the gas storage business were reported within the Exploration & Production segment. Data for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 have been restated. Prior year data have not been restated.
(2)This item mainly concerned mainly intra-group sales of commodities, services and capital goods recorded in the assets of the purchasing business segment as of the end of the period.
(2)(3)iEuro per share or U.S. dollars per American Depositary Receipt (ADR), as the case may be. From 2006, one ADR represents two Eni shares. Previously, one ADR was equivalent to five Eni shares. Data per ADR for the years 2004-2005year 2005 have been recalculated accordingly.
(3)(4)iEni’s financial statements are stated in euro. The translations of certain euro amounts into U.S. dollars are included solely for the convenience of the reader. The convenient translations should not be construed as representations that the amounts in euro have been, could have been, or could in the future be, converted into U.S. dollars at this or any other rate of exchange. Data per ADR, with the exception of dividends, were translated at the EUR/U.S. $ average exchange rate as recorded by in the Federal Reserve Board official statistics for each year presented (see the table on page 5). Dividends per ADR for the years 20042005 through 20072008 have been translated into U.S. dollars for each year presented using the Noon Buying Rate on payment dates, as recorded on the payment date of the interim dividend and of the balance to the full-year dividend, respectively. Eni started to pay an interim dividend in 2005. The dividend for 20082009 was converted at the Noon Buying Rate recorded on the payment date of the interim dividend (euro 0.650.50 per share) which occurred on September 25, 2008.24, 2009. The balance of euro 0.650.50 per share payable on May 2124 and May 29, 200927, 2010 for the holders of the Eni share and the ADR, respectively, was translated at the Noon Buying Rate as recorded on December 31, 2008.2009. On May 4, 2009,April 9, 2010 the Noon Buying Rate was $1.34$1.35 per euro 1.00.

2


Selected Operating Information

The tables below set forth selected operating information with respect to Eni’s proved reserves, developed and undeveloped, of crude oil (including condensates and natural gas liquids) and natural gas, as well as other data as of and for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2008.2009. Data on production of oil and natural gas and hydrocarbon production sold includes Eni’s share of production of affiliates and joint ventures accounted for under the equity or cost method of accounting.

 

Year ended December 31,

 
 

2004

 

2005

 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

 
 
 
 
 
Proved reserves of liquids of consolidated subsidiaries at period end (mmBBL) 3,972 3,748 3,457 3,127 3,243
of which developed 2,471 2,331 2,126 1,953 2,009
Proved reserves of liquids of equity-accounted entities at period end (mmBBL) 36 25 24 142 142
of which developed   19 18 26 33
Proved reserves of natural gas of consolidated subsidiaries at period end (BCF) 18,278 17,501 16,897 16,549 17,214
of which developed 10,501 11,159 10,949 10,967 11,138
Proved reserves of natural gas of equity-accounted entities at period end (BCF) 157 90 68 3,022 3,015
of which developed   70 48 428 420
Proved reserves of hydrocarbons of consolidated subsidiaries in mmBOE at period end (1) 7,154 6,796 6,400 6,010 6,242
of which developed 4,300 4,275 4,032 3,862 3,948
Proved reserves of hydrocarbons of equity-accounted entities in mmBOE at period end (a) 64 41 36 668 666
of which developed   31 27 101 107
Reserve replacement ratio (2) 91 43 38 38 136
Average daily production of liquids (KBBL/d) 1,034 1,111 1,079 1,020 1,026
Average daily production of natural gas available for sale (mmCF/d) (3) 3,171 3,344 3,679 3,819 4,143
Average daily production of hydrocarbons available for sale (KBOE/d) (3) 1,586 1,693 1,720 1,684 1,748
Hydrocarbon production sold (mmBOE) 576.5 614.9 625.1 611.4 632.0
Oil and gas production costs per BOE (4)   5.59 5.79 6.90 7.77
Profit per barrel of oil equivalent (5)   12.20 14.97 14.03 15.80





 

2005

 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

 
 
 
 
 
Proved reserves of liquids of consolidated subsidiaries at period end (mmBBL) 3,748 3,457 3,127 3,243 3,377
of which developed 2,331 2,126 1,953 2,009 2,001
Proved reserves of liquids of equity-accounted entities at period end (mmBBL) 25 24 142 142 86
of which developed 19 18 26 33 34
Proved reserves of natural gas of consolidated subsidiaries at period end (BCF) 17,501 16,897 16,549 17,214 16,262
of which developed 11,159 10,949 10,967 11,138 11,650
Proved reserves of natural gas of equity-accounted entities at period end (BCF) 90 68 3,022 3,015 1,588
of which developed 70 48 428 420 234
Proved reserves of hydrocarbons of consolidated subsidiaries in mmBOE at period end (1) 6,796 6,400 6,010 6,242 6,209
of which developed 4,275 4,032 3,862 3,948 4,030
Proved reserves of hydrocarbons of equity-accounted entities in mmBOE at period end (a) 41 36 668 666 362
of which developed 31 27 101 107 74
Reserve replacement ratio (2) 43 38 38 136 95
Average daily production of liquids (KBBL/d) 1,111 1,079 1,020 1,026 1,007
Average daily production of natural gas available for sale (mmCF/d) (3) 3,344 3,679 3,819 4,143 4,074
Average daily production of hydrocarbons available for sale (KBOE/d) (3) 1,693 1,720 1,684 1,748 1,716
Hydrocarbon production sold (mmBOE) 614.9 625.1 611.4 632.0 622.8
Oil and gas production costs per BOE (4) 5.59 5.79 6.90 7.77 7.49
Profit per barrel of oil equivalent (5) 12.20 14.97 14.03 15.80 7.96
  
 
 
 
 

(a) Mainly refers to Eni’s share of proved reserves relating to three Russian companies purchased in 2007 and participated by the joint venture OOO SeverEnergia, owned by Eni as part of a bid procedure for assets of bankrupt Yukos (Eni’s share was 60%(60%) and its Italian partner Enel (40%). Gazprom was granted an option to acquireOn September 23, 2009 the two partners divested a 51% intereststake in these three entities. Considering thatthe venture to Gazprom has exercised itsin line with the call option Eni’s interest will be diluted to approximately 30% and proved reserves that were booked in connection with the acquisition will be reduced by approximately 50%.arrangement.
(1) Includes approximately 737, 760, 754, 749, 746 and 746769 BCF of natural gas held in storage in Italy atas of December 31, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2008,2009, respectively. See "Item 4 – Information on the Company – Exploration & Production – Storage".
(2) Referred to Eni’s subsidiaries. Consists of: (i) the increase in proved reserves of consolidated subsidiaries attributable to: (a) purchases of minerals in place; (b) revisions of previous estimates; (c) improved recovery; and (d) extensions and discoveries, less sales of minerals in place; divided by (ii) production during the year as set forth in the reserve tables, in each case prepared in accordance with SFAS 69.Topic 932. See the unaudited supplemental oil and gas information in Item 18 – Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Expressed as a percentage.
(3) Natural gas production volumes exclude gas consumed in operations (220, 251,(251, 286, 296, 281 and 281300 mmCF/d in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2008,2009, respectively).
(4) Expressed in U.S. dollars. Consists of production costs (costs incurred to operate and maintain wells and field equipment including also royalties) prepared in accordance with IFRS divided by actual production neton an available-for-sale basis, expressed in barrels of production volumes of natural gas consumed in operations.oil equivalent. See the unaudited supplemental oil and gas information in Item“Item 18 – Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Data for the years prior to 2005 are not available as they were prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.Statements”.
(5) Expressed in U.S. dollars. Results of operations from oil and gas producing activities, divided by actual sold production, in each case prepared in accordance with IFRS to meet ongoing U.S. reporting obligations. See the unaudited supplemental oil and gas information in Item"Item 18 – Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsStatements" for a calculation of results of operations from oil and gas producing activities. Data for the years prior to 2005 are not available as they were in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Includes results of operations of joint ventures and other equity-accounted entities which results were immaterial.

3


Selected Operating Information continued

 

Year ended December 31,

 
 

2004

 

2005

 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

 
 
 
 
 
Sales of natural gas to third parties (6) 72.79 77.08 79.63 78.75 83.69
Natural gas consumed by Eni (6) 3.70 5.54 6.13 6.08 5.63
Sales of natural gas of affiliates (Eni’s share) (6) 5.84 7.08 7.65 8.74 8.91
Total sales and own consumption of natural gas of the Gas & Power segment (6) 82.33 89.70 93.41 93.57 98.23
E&P natural gas sales in Europe and in the Gulf of Mexico (6) (7) 4.70 4.51 4.69 5.39 6.00
Worldwide natural gas sales (6) 87.03 94.21 98.10 98.96 104.23
Transport of natural gas for third parties in Italy (6) 28.26 30.22 30.90 30.89 33.84
Length of natural gas transport network in Italy at period end (8) 30.2 30.7 30.9 31.1 31.5
Electricity sold (9) 16.95 27.56 31.03 33.19 29.93
Refinery throughputs (10) 35.75 36.68 36.27 35.21 33.98
Balanced capacity of wholly-owned refineries (11) 504 524 534 544 544
Retail sales (in Italy and rest of Europe) (10) 14.40 13.72 12.48 12.65 12.67
Number of service stations at period end (in Italy and rest of Europe) 9,140 6,282 6,294 6,440 5,956
Average throughput per service station (in Italy and rest of Europe) (12) 2,488 2,479 2,470 2,486 2,502
Petrochemical production (10) 7.12 7.28 7.07 8.80 7.37
Engineering & Construction order backlog at period end (13) 8,521 10,122 13,191 15,390 19,105
Employees at period end (units) 70,348 72,258 73,572 75,862 78,880





 

2005

 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

 
 
 
 
 
Sales of natural gas to third parties (6) 77.08 79.63 78.75 83.69 83.79
Natural gas consumed by Eni (6) 5.54 6.13 6.08 5.63 5.81
Sales of natural gas of affiliates (Eni’s share) (6) 7.08 7.65 8.74 8.91 7.95
Total sales and own consumption of natural gas of the Gas & Power segment (6) 89.70 93.41 93.57 98.23 97.55
E&P natural gas sales in Europe and in the Gulf of Mexico (6) (7) 4.51 4.69 5.39 6.00 6.17
Worldwide natural gas sales (6) 94.21 98.10 98.96 104.23 103.72
Transport of natural gas for third parties in Italy (6) 30.22 30.90 30.89 33.84 37.27
Length of natural gas transport network in Italy at period end (8) 30.7 30.9 31.1 31.5 31.5
Electricity sold (9) 27.56 31.03 33.19 29.93 33.96
Refinery throughputs (10) 36.68 36.27 37.15 35.84 34.55
Balanced capacity of wholly-owned refineries (11) 524 534 544 544 554
Retail sales (in Italy and rest of Europe) (10) 13.72 12.48 11.80 12.03 12.02
Number of service stations at period end (in Italy and rest of Europe) 6,282 6,294 6,441 5,956 5,986
Average throughput per service station (in Italy and rest of Europe) (12) 2,479 2,470 2,486 2,502 2,477
Petrochemical production (10) 7.28 7.07 8.80 7.37 6.52
Engineering & Construction order backlog at period end (13) 10,122 13,191 15,390 19,105 18,730
Employees at period end (units) 72,258 73,572 75,862 78,880 78,417
  
 
 
 
 

(6) Expressed in BCM.
(7) From 2006, also includes E&P sales of volumes of natural gas produced in the Gulf of Mexico.
(8) Expressed in thousand kilometers.
(9) Expressed in TWh.
(10) Expressed in mmtonnes.
(11) Expressed in KBBL/d.
(12) Expressed in thousand liters per day. Refers to the Agip branded network only, as in years up to 2005 Eni also sold refined products on the "IP" branded network of service stations in Italy.
(13) The sum of the order backlog of Saipem SpA and Snamprogetti SpA, expressed in million euro.euro million.

4


Exchange Rates

The following tables set forth, for the periods indicated, certain information regarding the Noon Buying Rate in U.S. dollars per euro, rounded to the second decimal (Source: The Federal Reserve Board).

 

High

 

Low

 

Average (1)

 

At period end

 
 
 
 
 

(U.S. dollars per euro)

Year ended December 31,        
2004 1.36 1.18 1.24 1.35
2005 1.35 1.17 1.24 1.18
2006 1.33 1.19 1.26 1.32
2007 1.49 1.29 1.37 1.46
2008 1.60 1.24 1.47 1.39




Year ended December 31,        
2005 1.35 1.17 1.24 1.18
2006 1.33 1.19 1.26 1.32
2007 1.49 1.29 1.37 1.46
2008 1.60 1.24 1.47 1.39
2009 1.51 1.25 1.39 1.43
  
 
 
 

(1) Average of the Noon Buying Rates for the last business day of each month in the period.

 

 

High

 

Low

 

At period end

 
 
 
 

(U.S. dollars per euro)

November 2008 1.30 1.25 1.27
December 2008 1.44 1.26 1.39
January 2009 1.39 1.28 1.28
February 2009 1.31 1.25 1.27
March 2009 1.37 1.25 1.31
April 2009 1.35 1.30 1.32
May 2009 (through May 4, 2009) 1.34 1.33 1.34



November 2009 1.51 1.47 1.50
December 2009 1.51 1.42 1.43
January 2010 1.45 1.39 1.39
February 2010 1.40 1.35 1.37
March 2010 1.38 1.33 1.35
April 2010 (through April 9, 2010) 1.36 1.34 1.35
  
 
 

Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the euro and the dollar affect the dollar equivalent of the euro price of the Shares on the Telematico and the dollar price of the ADRs on the NYSE. Exchange rate fluctuations also affect the dollar amounts received by owners of ADRs upon conversion by the Depository of cash dividends paid in euro on the underlying Shares. The Noon Buying Rate on May 4, 2009April 9, 2010 was $1.34$1.35 per euro 1.00.

 

Risk Factors

Competition

There is strong competition worldwide, both within the oil industry and with other industries, to supply energy to the industrial, commercial and residential energy markets.

Eni encountersfaces competition from other oil and natural gas companies in all areas of its operations.

 In the Exploration & Production business, Eni faces competition from both international oil companies and state runstate-owned oil companies in a number of geographic markets for obtaining exploration and development rights, and developing and applying new technologytechnologies to maximize hydrocarbon recovery. Furthermore, Eni may face a competitive disadvantage in many of these markets because of its relatively smaller size compared to other international oil companies, particularly when bidding for large scale or capital intensive projects, and may be exposed to industry-wide cost increases to a greater extent compared to its larger competitors given its potentially smaller market power with respect to suppliers. If, as a result of those competitive pressures, Eni fails to obtain new exploration and development acreage or to apply and develop new technology,technologies, its growth prospects and future results of operations and cash flows may be adversely affected.
 Eni is increasingly in competition with state run oil companies who are partners of Eni in a number of oil and gas projects and titles in the host countries where Eni conducts its upstream operations. These state run oil companies can change contractual terms and other conditions of oil and gas projects in order to obtain a larger profit share from a given project, by this way reducing Eni’s profit share. For example, Sonatrach, the Algeria national oil company, is seeking to modify the contractual terms of certain PSAs in which Eni is party to achieve a redistribution of the tax burden of such PSAs. Sonatrach alleges that it is currently bearing part of the tax burden attributable to Eni following the enactment of certain modifications to the

5


country’s tax regime. If this negotiation results in a negative outcome for Eni, the future profitability of certain of Eni’s PSAs in Algeria will be reduced. For more information on this matter see "Item 4 – Exploration & Production – Algeria".
In its domestic natural gas business, Eni faces increasingly strong competition fromon both nationalthe Italian market and internationalthe European market driven by weak prospects for demand growth over the short and medium-term, and increasing gas availability on the marketplace. Significant investments to expand import capacity to Europe via pipeline and LNG have been made by a number of operators including Eni, in recent years. At the same time, forecasts for demand growth in Europe have been overestimated and the economic

5


downturn has caused a much larger-than-anticipated demand contraction. As natural gas is a commodity, gas oversupply may lead suppliers particularly followingto compete more aggressively on pricing thus leading to lower gas margins for the whole sector. The condition of oversupply is signaled by current trends in differentials between spot price and long-term prices for natural gas, whereby the former no longer appear to be correlated to oil-linked formulas that determine gas prices in long-term supply contracts. Management believes that a better balance between demand and supply on the European market will not be achieved until 2013 at the earliest. The circumstances described above might negatively affect the Company’s future results of operations and cash flow in its natural gas business, also taking into account the Company’s contractual obligations to off-take minimum annual volumes of natural gas in accordance to its long-term gas supply contracts that include take-or-pay clauses. See the sector-specific risk section below. In Italy, competitive pressures are fostered by the liberalization of the Italian natural gas market introducedthat was mandated by Legislative Decree No. 164/2000 which provides for, among other things, the opening of the Italian market to competition, limitations to the size of gas companies relatively to the market and third party access to infrastructures, and the power of the Italian Authority for Electricity and Gas to regulate natural gas pricing in the residential sector and access to infrastructures. Increasingly high levels of competition in the Italian natural gas market could possibly entail reducedmay lead to lower natural gas selling margins (see below). In addition, Legislative Decree No. 164/2000 grants the Italian Authority for Electricity and Gas certain regulatory powers in matters of natural gas pricing and access to infrastructures. Outside of Italy, particularly in Europe, Eni faces competition from large well-established European utilities and other international oil and gas companies in growing its market share and acquiring or retaining clients. Furthermore, a number of large clients, particularly electricity producers, in both the domestic market and other European markets are planning to enter the supply market of natural gas. At the same time, a number of national gas producers from countries with large gas reserves are planning to sell natural gas directly to final clients, which would threaten the market position of companies like Eni which resell gas purchased from producing countries to final customers. These developments may increase the level of competition in both the national and other European markets for natural gas and reduce Eni’s operating profit. Risks
In its domestic electricity business, Eni competes with other producers and traders from Italy or outside of Italy who sell electricity on the Italian market. The Company expects in the near future increasing competition in the natural gas sector are exacerbated by the current economic downturn. Duedue to the commoditized nature of natural gas, lowering gas demand could resultweak GDP growth expected in a situation where suppliers compete more aggressivelyItaly and Europe over the next one to two years causing outside players to place excess production on pricing thus leading to lower gas margins for the whole sector.Italian market.
In its domestic electricity business, Eni competes with other producers and traders from Italy or outside of Italy who sell electricity in the Italian market. The Company expects in the near future increasing competition from suppliers outside Italy due to the current economic downturn.
 In retail marketing of refined products both in and outside Italy, Eni competes with third parties (including international oil companies and local operators such as supermarket chains) to obtain concessions to establish and operate service stations. Once established, Eni’s service stations compete primarily on the basis of pricing, services and availability of non-petroleum products. In Italy, there is pressure from political and institutional forces are urging greateradministrative entities, including the Italian Antitrust Authority, to increase levels of competition in the retail marketing of fuels. Eni expects developments on this issue to further increase pressure on selling margins in the retail marketing of fuels.
In the Petrochemical segment we face intense competition from well-established international players and state-owned petrochemical companies, particularly in the most commoditized market segments. Many of those competitors may benefit from cost advantages due to larger scale, looser environmental regulations, availability of oil-based feedstock, and more favorable location and proximity to end-markets. Excess capacity and sluggish economic growth may exacerbate competitive pressures. The Company expects continuing margin pressures in the foreseeable future as a result of those trends.
 Competition in the oilfield services, construction and engineering industries is primarily based on technical expertise, quality and number of services and availability of technologically advanced facilities (for example, vessels for offshore construction). Lower oil prices could result in lower margins and lowlower demand for volumes of oil services.

The Company’s failure or inability to respond effectively to competition could adversely impact the Company’s growth prospects, future results of operations and cash flows.

 

Risks associated with the exploration and production of oil and natural gas

The exploration and production of oil and natural gas requires high levels of capital expenditures and entails particular economic risks. It is subject to natural hazards and other uncertainties including those relating to the physical characteristics of oil and natural gas fields. The production of oil and natural gas is highly regulated and is subject to conditions imposed by governments throughout the world in matters such as the award of exploration and production interests, the imposition of specific drilling and other work obligations, environmental protection measures, control over the development and abandonment of fields and installations, and restrictions on production. The oil and gas industry is subject to the payment of royalties and income taxes which tend to be higher than those payable in many other commercial activities.

6


Exploratory drilling efforts may not be successful

Drilling for oil and gas involves numerous risks including the risk of dry holes or failure to find commercial quantities of hydrocarbons. The costs of drilling, completing and operating wells are often uncertain, and drilling operations may be unsuccessful as a result of a variety of factors, including unexpected drilling conditions, pressure or irregularities in formations, equipment failures or fires, blow-outs and various forms of accidents, marine risks such as collisions and adverse weather conditions and shortages or delays in the delivery of equipment. Exploring or drilling in offshore areas, particularly in deep waters, is generally more complex and riskier than in onshore areas; the same is true for exploratory activity in remote areas or in challenging environmental conditions such as those we are experiencing in the Caspian region or Alaska. In addition, we may fail to secure a market for the quantities of oil and gas that are discovered, for example because there is no economic or practicable means to transport such quantities to the final market. Failure to discover commercial quantities of oil and natural gas could have an adverse impact on Eni’s future growth prospects, results of operations and liquidity. Because Eni plans to invest significant capital expenditures in executing high risk exploration projects, it is likely that Eni will incur significant exploration and dry hole expenses in future years. High risk exploration projects include projects executed in deep and ultra-deep offshore and in new areas where the Company lacks installed production facilities. In particularParticularly, Eni plans to explore for oil and gas offshore, frequently in deep waterwaters or at deep drilling depths, where

6


operations are more difficult and costly than on land or at shallower depths and in shallower waters. Deep water operations generally require a significant amount of time between a discovery and the time that Eni can produce and market the oil or gas, increasing both the operational and financial risks associated with these activities. In the case of theThe Company plans to conduct risky exploration projects are conductedoffshore in the deep offshore of the Gulf of Mexico, Australia, Brazil, the Barents Sea, India,Libya, Angola, Nigeria, Norway and offshore Ireland.Indonesia. In 2009, managementthe Company invested euro 1.23 billion in executing exploration projects and it plans to spend significant amounts of exploration expenditures in these areas that may result in significant dry hole expenses.approximately euro 1.17 billion per annum on average over the next four years.

Furthermore, shortage of deep water rigs and failure to find additional commercial reserves could reduce future production of oil and natural gas which is highly dependent on the rate of success of exploratory activity.

Development projects bear significant operational risks which may adversely affect actual returns on such projects

Eni is involved in a number of development projects for the production of hydrocarbon reserves. Certain projects are planned to develop reserves principally offshore.in high risk areas, particularly offshore and in remote and hostile environments. Eni’s future results of operations and liquidity rely upon its ability to develop and operate major projects as planned. Key factors that may affect the economics of these projects include:

 the outcome of negotiations with co-venturers, governments, suppliers, customers or others including, for example, Eni’s ability to negotiate favorable long-term contracts with customers; the development of reliable spot markets that may be necessary to support the development of particular production projects, or commercial arrangements for pipelines and related equipment to transport and market hydrocarbons. Furthermore, projects executed with partners and co-venturers reduce the ability of the Company to manage risks and costs, and Eni could have limited influence over and control of the operations, behaviors and performance of its partners;
 timely issuance of permits and licenses by government agencies;
 the Company’s relative size compared to its main competitors which may prevent it from affording opportunities to participate in large-scale projects or affect its ability to reap benefits associated with economies of scale, for example by obtaining more favorable contractual terms by suppliersuppliers of goods and services;
 the ability to design development projects so as to prevent the occurrence of technical inconvenience;
 delays in manufacturing and delivery of critical equipment, or shortages in the availability of such equipment, causing cost overruns and delays;
 risks associated with the use of new technologies and the inability to develop advanced technologies to maximize the recoverability rate of hydrocarbons or gain access to previously inaccessible reservoirs;
 changes in operating conditions and costs, including thecosts. In recent years prior to 2009, we experienced a sharp rise in procurement costs and costs for leasing third party equipment or purchase services such as drilling rigs and shipping that we have experienced in recent years as a result of industry-wide cost inflation, resulting in cost overruns;overruns. Notwithstanding the global economic downturn, costs for industry-specific services and materials and equipment decreased less-than-anticipated or actually increased compared to the previous year as oil prices recovered fairly quickly from the lows seen at the end of 2008 and beginning of 2009. The Company expects that costs in its upstream operations will remain at the same level or post a slightly rising trend in future years compared to the level seen in 2009;
 the actual performance of the reservoir and natural field decline; and
 the ability and time necessary to build suitable transport infrastructures to export production to final markets.

7


Furthermore, deep waters and other hostile environments, where the majority of Eni’s planned and existing development projects are located, can exacerbate these problems. Delays and differences between scheduled and actual timing of critical events, as well as cost overruns may adversely affect completion, the total amount of expenditures to be incurred and start upstart-up of production from such projects and, consequently, actual returns. Finally, developing and marketing hydrocarbons reserves typically requires several years after a discovery is made. This is because a development project involves an array of complex and lengthy activities, including appraising a discovery in order to evaluate its commercial potential, sanctioning a development project and building and commissioning related facilities. As a consequence, rates of return for such long-lead-time projects are exposed to the volatility of oil and gas prices which may be substantially lower with respect to prices assumed when the investment decision was actually made, leading to lower rates of return. For example, we have experienced increased budgeted expenditures and a substantial delay in the scheduling of production start upstart-up at the Kashagan field, where development is ongoing. Moreover, in July 2007 these matters triggered a dispute withSpecifically, based on the new plan that was sanctioned by relevant Kazakh authorities. On October 31,Authorities in 2008, all the international partnersCompany increased estimated expenditures to develop the phase 1 of the project andfrom an original amount of U.S. $10.3 billion (Eni’s interest being at the Kazakh authorities agreed upontime 18.52%) – subject to adjustment to take into account cost inflation up to 2007 – to a new contractual and governance framework of the Kashagan project, settling the dispute. See "Item 4 – Exploration & Production – Caspian Sea" for a full description of the material terms of the agreement. In conjunction with the finalization of the agreements, parties also sanctioned the revised expenditure budget of phase-one, amounting to U.S. $32.2 billion (excluding general and administrative expenses), of which U.S. $25.4 billion related to the original scope of work of phase 1 (including tranches 1 and 2), with the remaining part planned to be spent to execute tranche 3 and build certain exporting facilities. First oil is expected late in 2012.. Eni will fund those investments in proportion to its participating interest of 16.81%. TheFirst oil is expected late in 2012 based on the new plan, while the original development plan that was filed with Kazakh Authorities in 2004 forecast expenditures of U.S. $10.3 billion (Eni’s interest being at the time 18.52%) to execute tranches 1&2 (to be adjusted to take into account cost inflation up to 2007) and first oil in 2008. The change in production start-up and the relevant cost increase over the original budget were driven by:by a number of factors including depreciation of the U.S. dollar versus the euro and other currencies; cost price escalation of goods and services required to execute the project; an original underestimation of the costs and complexity to operate in the North Caspian Sea due to lack of benchmarks; design changes to enhance the operability and safety standards of the offshore facilities. See "Item 4 – Exploration & Production – Caspian Sea" for a full description of the material terms of the Kashagan project.

7In 2009, we experienced significant cost overruns to develop our operated Blacktip project, offshore Australia, leading us to record an impairment charge of euro 153 million to take into account the reduced project profitability.


See "Item 4 – Business Overview – Exploration & Production". IfIn the event the Company is unable to develop and operate major projects as planned, particularly if the Company fails to exercise tight control over costs and time schedules, it may have a materialcould incur significant impairment charges associated with costs overruns and project delays in future years with an adverse effect on our results of operations and liquidity.

Inability to replace oil and natural gas reserves could adversely impact results of operations and financial condition

Eni’s results of operations and financial condition are substantially dependent on its ability to develop and sell oil and natural gas. Unless the Company is able to replace produced oil and natural gas, its reserves will decline. TheIn addition to being a function of production and new discoveries, the Company’s reserve replacement is also affected by the entitlement mechanism in its Production Sharing Agreements and similar contractual schemes. In accordance with such contracts, Eni is entitled to a portion of a field’s reserves, the sale of which shouldis intended to cover expenditures incurred by the Company to develop and operate the field. The higher the reference prices for Brent crude oil used to determine year-end amounts ofestimate Eni’s proved reserves, the lower the number of barrels necessary to recover the same amount of expenditures. TheIn 2009, the Company’s reserve replacement was negatively affected by reduced entitlements in its PSAs infor an estimated amount of 100 mmBOE, which was the years 2006 and 2007 when Eni’sprincipal factor leading to a reserve replacement ratio was 38% in both years, meaningof 95% for Eni’s subsidiaries (meaning that the Company replaced less reserves than those produced. Eni’s proved reserves of subsidiaries declined by 6.1% in 2007 and by 5.8% in 2006.produced). See "Item 4 – Business Overview – Exploration & Production". Future oil and gas production is dependent on the Company’s ability to access new reserves through new discoveries, application of improved techniques, success in development activity, negotiation with countries and other owners of known reserves and acquisitions. An inability to replace reserves could adversely impact future production levels and growth prospects, thus negatively affecting Eni’s future results of operations and financial condition.

We forecast a significant reduction in costs to develop and operate oil and gas fields. If we fail to benefit from this expected trend, our oil and gas margins will deteriorate due to falling hydrocarbons prices

Due to the current oil downturn, we expect that prices for oilfield services and materials will trend lower in the future. We intend to benefit from this reduction by implementing the needed cost initiatives to preserve our profitability in an environment of low oil prices. Cost initiatives include rescheduling of certain field developments to obtain cost saving and renegotiating contracts for oilfield services with our supplies on more favorable terms. If we fail to achieve the targeted levels of cost reductions, our profits per BOE in the Exploration & Production segment will be adversely affected.

Changes in crude oil and natural gas prices may adversely affect Eni’s results of operations

The exploration and production of oil and gas is a commodity business with a history of price volatility. The single largest variable that affects the Company’s results of operations and financial condition is crude oil prices. Eni generally does not hedge its exposure to variabilityfluctuations in future cash flows due to crude oil price movements. As a consequence, Eni’s profitability depends heavily on crude oil and natural gas prices.

Crude oil and natural gas prices are subject to international supply and demand and other factors that are beyond Eni’s control, including among other things:

8


(i) the control on production exerted by OPEC member countries which control a significant portion of the worldwideworld's supply of oil and can exercise substantial influence on price levels;
(ii) global geopolitical and economic developments, including sanctions imposed on certain oil-producing countries on the basis of resolutions of the United Nations or bilateral sanctions;
(iii) global and regional dynamics of demand and supply of oil and gas; in the current economic downturn we have experienced a significant reduction in worldwide demand for crude oil and in the European gas demand which have negatively impacted crude oil and natural gas prices;
(iv) prices and availability of alternative sources of energy;
(v) governmental and intergovernmental regulations, including the implementation of national or international laws or regulations intended to limit greenhouse gas emissions, which could impact the prices of hydrocarbons; and
(vi) success in developing and applying new technology.

All these factors can affect the global balance between demand and supply for oil and prices of oil. Such factors can also affect the prices of natural gas because natural gas prices for the major part of our supplies are typically indexed to the prices of crude oil and certain refined petroleum products. Lower crude oil prices have an adverse impact on Eni’s results of operations and cash flowsflow. In 2009, the average price of the Brent barrel decreased by 36.6% compared to 2008 in dollar terms; gas prices experienced an even sharper decline driven by weak spot prices due to large gas availability on the marketplace. Spot prices of gas at the Henry Hub market, which is a highly liquid spot market in the U.S. declined by 55.4% in dollar terms. As a consequence of those trends in the market benchmarks, realized prices of the Company’s equity oil and gas decreased by 31.2% on average in dollar terms. Reduced prices negatively impacted the operating profit reported by the Exploration & Production segment which was down by 43.8%, or euro 7,119 million from operations.a year ago.

Furthermore, lower oil and gas prices over prolonged periods may also adversely affect Eni’s results of operations and cash flowsflow by: (i) reducing rates of return of development projects either planned or being implemented, leading the Company to reschedule, postpone or cancel development projects, or accept a lower rate of return on such projects; (ii) reducing the Group’s liquidity, entailing lower resources to fund expansion projects, further dampening the Company’s ability to grow future production and revenues; and (iii) triggering a review of future recoverability of the Company’s carrying amounts of oil and gas properties, which could lead to the recognition of significant impairments charges.

8


Uncertainties in Estimates of Oil and Natural Gas Reserves

Numerous uncertainties are inherent in estimating quantities of proved reserves and in projecting future rates of production and timing of development expenditures. The accuracy of proved reserve estimates depends on a number of factors, assumptions and variables, among which the most important are the following:

 the quality of available geological, technical and economic data and their interpretation and judgment;
 projections regarding future rates of production and timing of development expenditures;
 whether the prevailing tax rules, other government regulations and contractual conditions will remain the same as on the date estimates are made;
 results of drilling, testing and the actual production performance of Eni’s reservoirs after the date of the estimates which may require substantial upward or downward revisions; and
 changes in oil and natural gas prices which could affect the quantities of Eni’s proved reserves because the estimates of reserves are based on prices and costs existing as of the date when those estimates are made. In particular the reserves estimates are subject to revisions as prices fluctuate due to the cost recovery mechanism under the Company’s PSAs and similar contractual schemes.

Many of these factors, assumptions and variables involved in estimating proved reserves are beyond Eni’s control and may change over time and impact the estimates of oil and natural gas reserves. Accordingly, the estimated reserves could be significantly different from the quantities of oil and natural gas that will ultimately will be recovered. Additionally, any downward revision in Eni’s estimated quantities of proved reserves would indicate lower future production volumes, which could adversely impact Eni’s results of operations and financial condition.

Oil and gas activity may be subject to increasingly high levels of income taxes

In recent years, Eni has experienced adverse changes in tax regimes applicable to oil and gas operations in Italy and in a number of countries where the Company conducts its upstream operations. In 2009 management estimates that the tax rate of the Company’s Exploration & Production segment was approximately 60%, representing an increase of an estimated 4% compared to 2008 as a result of new mechanisms that were implemented to calculate income taxes currently payable in a number of non OECD countries, namely Libya. See "Item 5 – Operating and Financial Review and Prospects – Taxation for the year". Management believes that adverse changes are always possible in

9


the tax regimes of any country in which Eni conducts its oil and gas operations, regardless of the level of stability of the political and legislative framework in each country. See "Political considerations" below. In recent years, developments in the regulatory framework, mainly regarding tax issues, have been implemented or announced also in EU countries and in North America. In 2008, Italy enacted new tax rules that increased the statutory tax rate applicable to energy companies with annual turnover in excess of euro 25 million by 5.5 percentage points,5.5%, thus reversing a reduction in the statutory tax rate of the same amount that was enacted the previous year. EarlyIn 2009, the above mentioned 5.5% supplemental tax rate was increased by another percentage point to 6.5% thus bringing the Italian statutory tax-rate to 34%. Also in 2009, the Italian Parliament enacted a supplemental tax rate of 4% that has to be applied to profit before income taxes reported by the parent company Eni SpA associated with the Treatya treaty between Italy and Libya. This supplemental tax rate will entail increased tax payables amounting toby approximately euro 300239 million for the full year 2009.

Adverse changes in the tax rate applicable to the Group profit before income taxes would translate intohave a negative impactsimpact on Eni’s future results of operations and cash flows. Furthermore, the marginal tax rate in the oil and gas industry tends to increase in correlation with higher oil prices which could make it difficult for Eni to translate higher oil prices into increased net profit. However, the Company does not expect that the marginal tax rate will trend lowerdecrease in response to falling oil prices.

 

Political Considerations

A substantial portion of our oil and gas reserves and gas supplies are located in politically, socially and economically unstable countries where we are exposed to material disruptions to our operations

Substantial portions of Eni’s hydrocarbon reserves are located in countries outside the EU and North America, some of which may be politically or economically less stable than EU or North American countries. AtAs of December 31, 2008,2009, approximately 80% of Eni’s proved hydrocarbon reserves were located in such countries. Similarly, a substantial portion of Eni’s natural gas supplies comes from countries outside the EU and North America. In 2007,2009, approximately 70%60% of Eni’s supplies of natural gas came from such countries. See "Item 4 – Gas & Power – Natural Gas Supplies". Adverse political, social and economic developments in any of those countries may affect Eni’s ability to continue operating in an economic way, either temporarily or permanently, and Eni’s ability to access oil and gas reserves. Particularly Eni faces risks in connection with the following issues: (i) lack of well-established and reliable legal systems and uncertainties surrounding enforcement of contractual rights; (ii) unfavorable developments in laws, regulations and contractual arrangements leading for example to expropriations or forced divestitures of assets and unilateral cancellation or modification of contractual terms. For example, in conjunction with the rescheduling of the Kashagan project in 2007, the Kazakh authorities opened a dispute against the international partners of the consortium operating the Kashagan development claiming failure on part of the consortium to fulfill certain contractual obligations. Subsequently, the Kazakh authorities and the international partners of the consortium have agreed on a new contractual framework of the project. See "Item 4 – Exploration & Production – Caspian Sea" for a full description of the material terms of the agreement; (iii) restrictions on exploration, production, imports and exports; (iv) tax or royalty increases (including retroactive claims); and (v) civil and social unrest leading to sabotages, acts of violence and incidents. For example, we have been

9


experiencing continuing social unrest in Nigeria leading to a number of disruptions at certain Eni oil producing facilities in the country. As a consequence, our oil and gas production in the country has yet to return to normal production levels. In the first quarter of 2009, security problems have continued to impact our operations.

(i)lack of well-established and reliable legal systems and uncertainties surrounding enforcement of contractual rights;
(ii)unfavorable developments in laws, regulations and contractual arrangements leading for example to expropriations or forced divestitures of assets and unilateral cancellation or modification of contractual terms.
Eni is facing increasing competition from state-owned oil companies who are partnering with Eni in a number of oil and gas projects and titles in the host countries where Eni conducts its upstream operations. These state-owned oil companies can change contractual terms and other conditions of oil and gas projects in order to obtain a larger profit share from a given project, thereby reducing Eni’s profit share. For example, Sonatrach, the Algerian national oil company, is seeking to modify the contractual terms of certain PSAs in which Eni is party to achieve a redistribution of the tax burden of such PSAs. Sonatrach alleges that it is currently bearing part of the tax burden attributable to Eni following the enactment of certain modifications to the country’s tax regime. In case those negotiations result in a negative outcome for Eni, the future profitability of certain of Eni’s PSAs in Algeria will be reduced. For more information on this matter see "Item 4 – Exploration & Production – Algeria".
Furthermore, in 2009 we recorded a loss amounting to euro 205 million on certain receivables versus local co-venturers as certain contractual clauses relating to cost recovery were unfavorably interpreted and applied. As of the balance sheet date receivables for euro 461 million relating to cost recovery under a petroleum contract in a non-OECD country were the subject of arbitration proceedings. Similar issues are also being experienced in Kazakhstan where there is a dispute in relation to certain unresolved items of expenditure incurred by the operating company Karachaganak Petroleum Operating BV which has led to the Kazakh Authorities making certain claims against the company on the base of audits performed relating to prior years 2003-2006. Parties are negotiating in order to settle the dispute;
(iii)restrictions on exploration, production, imports and exports;
(iv)tax or royalty increases (including retroactive claims); and
(v)civil and social unrest leading to sabotages, acts of violence and incidents. For example, we have been experiencing continuing social unrest in Nigeria leading to a number of disruptions at certain Eni oil producing facilities in the country. As a consequence, our oil and gas production in the country has yet to return to normal production levels. In 2009, security problems have continued to impact our operations. See "Item 4 – Exploration & Production".

In 2008 we incurred significant asset impairments for euro 989 million in our Exploration & Production business amounting to euro 989 million mainly driven by changes in contractual arrangements and regulatory provisions and environmental obligations leading the

10


Company to reassess the recoverable amounts of a number of its oil and gas properties.properties, particularly in Turkmenistan.

See "Item 4 – Exploration & Production – Oil and Natural Gas Reserves"; and "Item 5 – Recent Developments". While the occurrence of thesethose events is unpredictable, it is likely that the occurrence of such events could cause Eni to incur material losses or facility disruptions, by this way adversely impacting Eni’s results of operations and cash flows.

Our activities in Iran could lead to sanctions under relevant U.S. legislation

Eni is currently conducting oil and gas operations in Iran. The legislation and other regulations of the United States of America impose sanctions on this country and may lead to the imposition of sanctions on any persons doing business in this country or with Iranian counterparties.

Under the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 (as amended, "ISA"), which implements sanctions against Iran with the objective of denying it the ability to support acts of international terrorism and fund the development or acquisition of weapons of mass destruction, upon receipt by the U.S. authorities of information indicating potential violation of this act, the President of the United States is authorized to start an investigation aiming at possibly imposing sanctions from a six-sanction menu against any person found in particular to have knowingly made investments of U.S. $20 million or more in any twelve-month period, contributing directly and significantly to the enhancement of Iran’s ability to develop its hydrocarbons resources. Furthermore, the ISA envisages thatcontemplates sanctions to be imposed by the President of the United States is bound to impose sanctions against any persons that knowingly contribute to certain military programs of Iran, effective on June 6, 2006. Eni cannot predict interpretations of, or the implementation policy of the U.S. Government under ISA with respect to Eni’s current or future activities in Iran or other areas. Eni has incurred capital expenditures in excess of U.S. $20 million in Iran in each of the last 910 years. Management expectsmay decide to continue investing in Iran yearlyinvest amounts in excess of that threshold$20 million per year in the foreseeablecountry in the future. No sanctions have been imposed to date on Eni’s activities in the country. Eni’s current activities in Iran are primarily limited to carrying out residual development activities relating to certain buy-back contracts it entered into in 2000 and 2001 and no sanctions have ever been imposed on2001. Specifically, activities are progressing to hand over operatorship of the Darquain oilfield to the local partners as development activities were concluded at this field in 2009. Darquain remained the sole activity operated by Eni in the Country. Regarding another project that was handed over in past years, Eni’s involvement consists essentially in being reimbursed for its past investments. In 2009, Eni’s production in Iran was 35 KBOE/d, approximately 2% of the Group’s total production. Eni does not believe that its activities in Iran have a material impact on the country.Group’s results.

Adding to Eni’s risks arising from this matter, a bill to amend and extend the extra-territorial reach of the economic sanctions imposed by the United States with respect to Iran has been passed by the U.S. House of Representatives and may lead to the passage of new laws in this area. Iran continues to be designated by the U.S. State Department as a State sponsoring terrorism. For a description of Eni’s operations in Iran see "Item 4 – Information on the Company – Exploration & Production – North Africa and Rest of World"Asia". It is possible that in future years Eni’s activities in Iran may be sanctioned under relevant U.S. legislation.

We are aware of initiatives by certain U.S. states and U.S. institutional investors, such as pension funds, to adopt or consider adopting laws, regulations or policies requiring divestment from, or reporting of interests in, companies that do business with countries designated as states sponsoring terrorism. These policies could adversely impact or limit investment by certain investors in our securities.securities and so possibly impact adversely our share price.

 

Cyclicality of the Petrochemical Industry

The petrochemical industry is subject to cyclical fluctuations in demand in response to economic cycles, with consequential effects on prices and profitability exacerbated by the highly competitive environment of this industry. Eni’s petrochemical operations have been in the past and may be adversely affected in the future by worldwide economic slowdowns, intense competitive pressures and excess installed production capacity. Furthermore, Eni’s petrochemical operations face increasing competition from AsiaticAsian companies and national oil companies’ petrochemical divisions which can leverage on certain long-term competitive advantages in terms of lower operating costs and feedstock purchase costs. In particular,Particularly, Eni’s petrochemical operations are located mainly in Italy and Western Europe where the regulatory framework and public environmental sensitivity are generally more stringent than in other countries, especially Far East countries, resulting in higher operating costs of our petrochemical operation compared to the Company’s Asiatic competitors due to the need to comply with applicable laws and regulations in environmental and other related matters. In 2008Additionally, our petrochemical operations lack sufficient scale and competitiveness in a number of sites. Due to weak industry fundamentals, intense competitive pressures and high feedstock costs, our petrochemicals operations postedincurred operating losses in both 2009 and 2008 of euro 822675 million due to sharply higher feed-stock costs inand euro 845 million, respectively. Results were also affected by the first halfrecognition of the year and lower product volumes and margins in the second half due to the current economic downturn and related asset impairments. Impairmentimpairment losses were recorded amounting to euro 121 million and euro 278 million respectively as the recoverable amounts of certain petrochemicals plants were

11


lower than their carrying amounts due to deteriorating profitability prospects on the back of lowered expectations for industry fundamentals and unfavorable trends in the trading environment. As

10


the downturn is expected to continue for the full year 2009, we doManagement does not projectexpect any significant improvementrecovery in our petrochemicals business profitability.industry fundamentals and the trading environment for 2010, making it likely that further operating losses will be incurred.

 

LiberalizationRisks in the Company Gas & Power business segment

i) Market risks

In 2009 the Company’s results of operations and cash flow were negatively affected by the Italian Natural Gas Marketsevere contraction in gas demand due to the economic downturn and increasing competitive pressures resulting from large gas availability on the market place

Legislative Decree No. 164/2000 opened upIn 2009 European gas demand was severely impacted by the economic downturn, as a fall in both producing activities and demand for electricity reduced gas consumption. European gas demand decreased by 7.4% from 2008, excluding seasonal effects. The Italian naturalmarket was particularly hit by the downturn as demand fell by approximately 9 BCM from 2008, down 10%, and almost 10 BCM from the pre-crisis levels seen in 2007, down 12%, excluding seasonal effects. At the same time, new gas supplies entered the market as several operators, including Eni, completed plans to competition asupgrade gas import pipelines from January 1, 2003.gas producing countries or projects to build new facilities to import gas to Europe via LNG carriers. In particular, Eni finalized plans to upgrade the import capacity of its two main pipelines from Russia and Algeria increasing capacity by an overall amount of 13 BCM/y (the gas pipelines TAG and TTPC), with new capacity entirely sold to third parties. A new LNG terminal with a capacity of 8 BCM/y commenced operations late in 2009, operated by a consortium of competitors. As a result, all customers in Italy are free to choose their supplier of natural gas. The decree, among other things, introduced rules which have a significant impactgas availability on Eni’s activity, as the Company is present in all the phases of the natural gas chain:

until December 31, 2010, antitrust thresholds are in place for gas operators in Italy as follows: (i) effective January 1, 2002, operators are prohibited to transmit into the national transport network imported or domestically produced gas volumes higher than a preset share of Italian final consumption. This share was 75% of total final consumption in the first year of regulation, decreasing by 2 percentage points per year to achieve a 61% threshold in terms of final consumption by 2009 (this share amounted to 63% in 2008); and (ii) effective January 1, 2003, operators are forbidden from marketing gas volumes to final customers in excess of 50% of overall volumes marketed to final customers. Compliance with these ceilings is verified annually by comparing actual average shares reached by any operator in a given three-year period for both volumes input and volumes marketed to customers to average shares permitted by the law for the same period. Actual shares are computed net of losses (in the case of sales) and volumes of natural gas consumed in own operations. Based on a bill passed by the Italian upper house, Eni expects that these antitrust thresholds will be renewed when they expire in 2010; and
access to natural gas infrastructures is guaranteed to any natural gas operator on the basis of certain procedures that must be transparent and non discriminatory. Natural gas infrastructures comprise high pressure, high sized pipelines for transporting natural gas over long distances, certain depleted fields to store natural gas, re-gasification facilities and low pressure, small sized pipelines for distributing natural gas to residential and commercial clients located in urban centers. Tariffs to use these infrastructures are set by the Authority for Electricity and Gas, an independent governmental body.

Furthermore, on June 30, 2008 provisions came into effect on the unbundling of regulated entities in the Italian gas sector on the basis of a Code that was adopted by the Authority for Electricity and Gas in 2007. According to unbundling rules, controlling entities as in the case of the parent company Eni SpA are forbidden from interfering in the decision-making process of its subsidiaries running gas transport, storage and distribution infrastructures.

Eni expects that a combination of regulatory effects and increasing competition will limit growth prospects and profitability of our natural gas business in Italy as discussed below.

Eni has been experiencing significant pressure on its natural gas margins1 since the inception of the liberalization process in Italy. In the current economic downturn, margin pressures could worsen also considering an expected increase in supplies of natural gas to the Italian market increased at a time when demand actually shrunk, resulting in light of new import capacity that has been completed or is expected to come on stream in the next one to three years

Since the inceptionoversupply. Accordingly, Eni’s results of the liberalization process in the Italian natural gas market, Eni has been experiencingmarketing business, sales volumes and average gas selling margins1 were driven down by rising competition and weak demand both in its naturalItaly and Europe. Large gas business leading to lower selling margins due to the entry of new competitors into the market. Certain competitors of Eni are supplied byavailability on other European markets also prevented the Company itself, generally on the basisfrom disposing of long-term contracts. In fact, in order to comply with the above mentioned regulatory thresholds relating to volumes supplied through the national transport network and sales volumes in Italy, Eni sold part of its gas availability underby selling it on European markets. This situation was exacerbated by lower gas consumption in the U.S. driven by the economic downturn and recent developments in extracting gas by unconventional sources. As a result of these trends, large amounts of LNG were re-directed towards Europe. The condition of oversupply on the European market is signaled by the circumstance that gas spot prices no longer appear correlated to trends in oil prices. This trend has resulted in Eni being less competitive as its take-or-pay supply contractscosts are based on the price formulas of long-term supply agreements which link the price of gas to third parties importing said volumesthe price of oil.

The outlook for the European gas sector is challenging as current imbalances between demand and supply in Europe and Italy might negatively affect the Company’s results of operation and cash flows in future years

The outlook for gas supply and demand both in Europe and Italy is challenging as GDP growth in the EU 27 Countries is expected to remain weak over the next few years and gas demand is expected to recover only gradually to pre-crisis levels. Currently, management does not expect that demand will recover to 2008 levels before 2013 and expects gas prices on spot markets to remain depressed for another one or two years. Gas availability will remain abundant on the marketplace as the Company expects that new infrastructures will be finalized over the next five to ten years, as publicly announced by certain consortia of competitors. In particular, it has been announced that a new pipeline will be built from Algeria to Italy via Sardinia with a 5 BCM capacity and marketing thema new LNG terminal will be started up in a yet to be identified location in Italy with 8 BCM capacity.

In addition, ongoing trends towards energy preservation and rising competition from renewable or alternative sources of energy will further dampen the recovery perspectives of gas demand. Specifically, at the March 2007 European Council, the European Heads of Government decided to adopt the Climate Action and Renewable Energy Package. This legislation was voted into law by the European Parliament in December 2008. The package, also known as "20-20-20 European Policy", includes a commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 20% by 2020 compared to emission levels recorded in 1990 (the target being 30% if an international agreement is reached), as well as an improved energy efficiency within the EU Member States of 20% by 2020 and a 20% renewable energy target by 2020. To factor in those trends, management has revised downwards its long-term projections of both European and Italian customers.gas demand growth. For morefurther information on Eni’s take-or-pay contracts, see "Item 4 – Gas & Power – Natural gas purchases"Power".

Management expects Eni’s gas selling margins in Italy to remain under pressure in the foreseeable future considering deteriorating The expected sluggish growth of demand, fundamentals in the current economic downturn, Eni’scoupled with ample gas availability underon the marketplace may adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and cash flow in its take-or-pay supply contracts, build-up of Eni’s supplies to the above mentioned competitors and new competitors entering the Italian market alsogas marketing business in light of ongoing or already implemented capital projects designed to expand the transport capacity of import pipelines to Italy and to build new import infrastructures, particularly LNG terminals. In fact, Eni is currently implementing its plans to upgrade its natural gas import pipelines mainly from Algeria and Russia to Italy to achieve an increase of 13 BCM/y in import capacity reaching full operation in 2010. Specifically, the upgrading of the TTPC pipeline from Algeria was completed in 2008 and is expected to be fully operational in 2009. The upgrade of the Russian pipeline is ongoing. Further 3 BCM/y of new import capacity will be added by upgrading the GreenStream gasline from Libya with expected start up in 2012. A large portion of the new capacity deriving from Eni’s upgrading projects has been or is planned to be sold to third parties. In addition, a third party project has been implemented to build a new LNG terminal with an 8 BCM/y capacity in the Adriatic Sea and is expected to commence operations by late 2009. These new or upgraded gas infrastructures will considerably increase supplies to the Italian natural gas market at a time when demand is falling due to the economic downturn.

future years.


(1)iFor a definition of margin see "Glossary".

1112


Despite the fact that an increasing portion of natural gas volumes purchased by Eni under its take-or-pay contracts is planned to be marketed outside Italy, management believes that unfavorableCurrent, negative trends in gas demands and supplies may impair the Italian demand and supply for natural gas on both the short and the longer-term, also dueCompany’s ability to the reaching of full operation at new supply infrastructures, and the evolution of Italian regulations of the natural gas sector, represent risk factors to the fulfillment of Eni’sfulfill its minimum off-take obligations in connection with its take-or-pay, long-term gas supply contracts

In order to secure long-term access to gas availability, particularly with a view to supplying the Italian gas market, the Company signed in the past a number of long-term gas supply contracts with key producing countries that supply the European gas markets. These contracts will ensure approximately 62.4 BCM of gas availability in 2010 (excluding the contribution of other subsidiaries and may resultassociates), have a residual life of approximately 20 years, and provide take-or-pay clauses whereby the Company is required to off-take minimum predetermined volumes of gas each year of the contractual term or, in case of failure, to pay the whole price, or a portion of it, up to the minimum contractual quantity. The take-or-pay clause entitles the Company to off-take pre-paid volumes of gas in later years during the term of the contract execution. The amount of price that is required being paid in advance and the schedules for off-taking pre-paid gas vary from contract to contract. Generally speaking, cash pre-payments are calculated on the basis of the energy prices prevailing in the year of non-fulfillment with the balance due in the year when the gas is actually off-taken. Amounts of pre-payments range from 10 to 100 percent of the full price. Right to off-take pre-paid gas expires within a ten-year term in some contracts or remains in place until contract expiration in other arrangements.

In addition, rights to off-take pre-paid gas in future years can only be exercised if the Company has fulfilled its minimum take obligation in a downward pressuregiven year. In this case, Eni will pay the residual price for the gas that was not off-taken initially based on a purchase price calculated as average of market prices prevailing in the year when the gas is actually off-taken. Similar considerations apply to ship-or-pay contractual obligations.

Management believes that the current outlook for gas demand and large gas availability on the marketplace, as well as the possible evolution of sector-specific regulation, present significant risks to the Company’s ability to fulfill its minimum take obligations associated with its long-term supply contracts.

In accordance with the terms of its long-term supply contracts, in 2009 Eni off-took lower volumes than the contractual minimum and recognized a trade payable amounting to euro 255 million corresponding to the amount of gas selling margins. Basedthat the Company was required contractually to off-take.

Management believes that over the next two years the Company will experience failure to fulfill its take-or-pay obligations with respect to significant volumes of gas, unless demand fundamentals improve substantially and a better balance between demand and supply is achieved on the foregoing, Eni’s futuremarketplace.

If Eni fails to off-take the contractual minimum amounts, it will be exposed to a price risk, because the purchase price Eni will ultimately be required to pay is based on prices prevailing after the date on which the off-take obligation arose. In addition, Eni is subject to the risk of not being able to dispose of pre-paid volumes. The Company also expects to incur financing costs to pay cash advances corresponding to contractual minimum amounts. As a result, the Company’s selling margins, results of operations and cash flows mightflow may be adverselynegatively affected.

Eni is committed to increasing natural gas sales in Europe. If Eni fails to achieve this target, future growth prospects may be adversely affected. Furthermore, Eni may be unable to fulfill its minimum take obligations under its take-or-pay purchase contracts and this could adversely impact results of operations and liquidity

Over the medium-term, Eni plans to increase its natural gas sales in Europe leveraging on its natural gas availability under take-or-pay purchase contracts it has entered into with major natural gas producing countries (namely Russia, Algeria, Libya, Norway and the Netherlands) and synergies from the acquisition of the Belgian gas operator Distrigas that was completed in 2008.2009. Should Eni fail to increase natural gas sales in Europe as planned due to poor strategy execution or competition, Eni’s future growth prospects, results of operations and cash flows might be adversely affected also taking account that Eni might be unable to fulfill its contractual obligations to purchase certain minimum amounts of natural gas based on its take-or-pay purchase contracts currently in force.

ii) Risks associated with sector-specific regulations in Italy

The opening of the Italian natural gas market as per Legislative Decree No. 164/2000 has gradually increased competition on the market thus reducing margins

Legislative Decree No. 164/2000 opened the Italian natural gas market to competition, impacting on Eni’s activities, as the company is engaged in all the phases of the natural gas chain. The opening to competition was achieved through the enactment of certain antitrust thresholds on volumes input into the national transport network and on volumes sold to final customers. Specifically, these antitrust thresholds are effective until December 31, 2010 and prescribe that: (i) operators transmit a volume of imported or domestically produced gas into the national

13


transport network which shall not be higher than a predetermined share of Italian final consumption. This share was 75% of total final consumption in the first year of regulation, decreasing by 2 percentage points per year to achieve a 61% threshold in terms of final consumption by 2009; and (ii) operators are forbidden from marketing gas volumes to final customers in excess of 50% of overall volumes marketed to final customers. Compliance with these ceilings is verified annually by comparing actual average shares reached by any operator in a given three-year period for both volumes input and volumes marketed to customers to average shares permitted by the law for the same period. Actual shares are computed net of losses (in the case of sales) and volumes of natural gas consumed in own operations. Based on a bill passed by the Italian upper house, Eni expects that these antitrust thresholds will be renewed when they expire in 2010.

These antitrust thresholds enabled new competitors to enter the Italian gas market, resulting in declining selling margins on gas. In addition, certain competitors of Eni are supplied by the Company itself, generally on the basis of long-term contracts. This is a result of the fact that, in order to comply with the above mentioned regulatory thresholds relating to volumes supplied through the national transport network and sales volumes in Italy, Eni sold part of its gas availability under its take-or-pay supply contracts to third parties importing said volumes to Italy and marketing them to Italian customers.

Risks associated with the regulatory powers entrusted to the Italian Authority for Electricity and Gas in the matter of pricing to residential customers

The Authority for Electricity and Gas is entrusted with certain powers in the matters of natural gas pricing. Specifically, the Authority for Electricity and Gas holds a general surveillance power on pricing in the natural gas market in Italy and the power to establish selling tariffs for the supply of natural gas to residential and commercial users consuming less than 200,000 CM/y (qualified as non eligible customers as of December 31, 2002 as defined by Legislative Decree No. 164/2000) taking into account the public goal of containing the inflationary pressure due to rising energy costs. Accordingly, decisions of the Authority on these matters may limit the ability of Eni to pass an increase in the cost of fuels onto final consumers of natural gas. Following a complex and lengthy administrative procedure started in 2004 and finalized in March 2007 with Resolution No. 79/2007, the Authority finally established a new indexation mechanism for updating the raw material cost component in supplies to residential and commercial users consuming less than 200,000 CM/y, establishing, among other things that Italian natural gas importers – including Eni – must renegotiate wholesale supply contracts in order to take account of the new indexation mechanism of the raw material cost component. This indexation mechanism has been recently updated based on Resolution No. 64/2009 of the Authority, which provides that changes in a preset basket of hydrocarbons are transferred to the cost of the supply to those customers. Also a floor has been established in the form of a fixed amount that applies only at certain low level of international prices of hydrocarbons. The Company does not expect any material impact following enactment of Resolution No. 64/2009.

However, management cannot exclude the possibility that in the future the Authority could implement measures in this matter which may negatively affect Eni results of operations and liquidity. On March 26, 2010 the Authority for Electricity and Gas published a consultation document regarding certain proposed amendments to the current mechanism that is used to update the raw material cost component in supplies to residential users. The document addresses Italian gas importers, including Eni. The Authority reaffirmed its belief that such cost component should continue being linked to supply prices as provided by the long-term contracts held by Eni as the incumbent operator in the Italian gas market, as evidence suggests that there have not been sufficiently liquid spot markets in Italy. However, the Authority considers that Eni still holds as large market power as to influence wholesale gas prices. Based on that belief, the Authority suggests that the incumbent operator disposes of predetermined amounts of gas at preset economic conditions that take into account the supply costs of an efficient portfolio of long-term supply contracts which could be lower than current wholesale prices realized by Eni. Alternatively, those gas disposals might be in favor of an independent buyer for amounts that might possibly cover the entire capacity of the wholesale market in Italy. Those proposals require establishment of adequate rules by relevant administrative authorities. In case the rules are not implemented, the Authority plans to continue updating the raw material component in supplies to residential customers on the base of the current updating mechanism as it schedules to do in the fourth quarter of 2010. The eventual update will take into account of any effects associated with ongoing renegotiations of long-term supply contracts and may lead to lower wholesale gas prices.

Due to the regulated access to natural gas transport infrastructures in Italy, Eni may not be able to sell in Italy all the natural gas volumes it planned to import and, as a consequence, the Company may be unable to sell all the natural gas volumes which it is committed to purchase under take-or-pay contract obligations

OverOther risk factors deriving from the medium-term, Eni has scheduled its import volumesregulatory framework are associated with the regulation of natural gas to Italy based on the assumption to use the purchase flexibility contractually provided by its take-or-pay purchase contracts during periods in which demand is expected to peak. These import programs are also based on the assumption that Eni will obtain the necessary transport capacity entitlements on the Italian transport network. However, Eni’s planning assumptions may be considered to be not fully in line with current rules regulating the access to the Italian gas transport infrastructures as provided fornetwork that is currently set by the Network Code currently in force which has been drafted in accordance with Decision No. 137 of July 17, 137/2002 of the Authority for Electricity and Gas. Such rules establish certainThe decision is fully incorporated into the network code presently in force as prepared by the system’s operator. The

14


decision sets priority criteria for transport capacity entitlements at points where the Italian transport infrastructurenetwork connects with international import pipelines (the so-called entry points to the Italian transport system). Specifically, Eni’s gas volumes purchased underoperators that are holders of take-or-pay contracts, as in the case of Eni, are entitled to a priority in the allocation ofallocating available transport capacity for amounts not exceedingwithin the limit of average daily contractual volumes. Accordingly, Eni’s purchaseGas volumes exceeding average daily contractual volumes are not entitled to any priority and, in gaining access tocase of congestion at any entry points, they are entitled available capacity on a proportionate basis together with all pending requests for capacity assignments. Under its take-or-pay purchase contracts, Eni has the Italian transport infrastructures. The contractual flexibility represented by Eni’s right to upliftoff-take daily volumes larger than average daily contractual volumes under its take-or-pay purchase contractsvolumes. This flexibility is important to Eni’s commercial programs as it is used when demand peaks, usually during the wintertime. In the event congestion occurs at entry points to the Italian transport network, underbased on current regulationregulations, available transport capacity would be entitled firstly to operators having a priority right, i.e. holders of take-or-pay contracts within the limits of average daily contractual volumes. Then any residual available transport capacity would be allocated in proportion to all pending capacity requests. However, in planning its commercial flows, the Company normally assumes to make full use of its contractual flexibility and to obtain all necessary capacity entitlements at the entry points to the national transport network. Those assumptions may be inconsistent with rules sets by Decision No. 137/2002 specifically with regard to priority criteria governing capacity entitlements. Eni considers Decision No. 137/2002 to be inconsistentillegitimate as it is, in Eni’s view, in contrast with the overall rationale of the European natural gas regulatory framework especially with reference to Directive 98/30/CE (superseded and replaced byon the gas market as provided in European Directive 03/55/CE) and Legislative Decree No. 164/2000, andCE. The Company based on that belief has openedcommenced an administrative procedure to repeal Decision No. 137/2002 before an administrative court.court which recently confirmed in part Eni’s position. An administrative appeals court also confirmed the Company’s position. Specifically, the Court stated that the purchase of the contractual flexibility is an obligation on part of the importer, which responds to a collective interest. According to the Court, there is no reasonable motivation whereby volumes corresponding to such contractual flexibility should not be granted priority in access to the network, also in case congestion occurs. At the moment, however, no case of congestion occurred at entry points to the Italian transport infrastructure such to impairing Eni’s marketing plans. Management cannot predict a final outcome of this proceeding. See "Item 4 – Regulation of the Italian Hydrocarbons Industry – Gas & Power". Eni cannot rule out a negative outcome for this matter. However, management

Management also believes that Eni’s results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected should a combination of market conditions in light of currentand regulatory constraints prevent Eni from selling its whole availability of natural gas purchased to fulfill its minimum take contract obligations (e.g. in case a congestion occurs at the entry points of the Italian transport infrastructure, Eni would be forced to uplift a smaller volume of gas than the minimum contractual take).obligations. See "Item 5 – Management Expectations of Operations".

A number of mandatory gas release measures have been recently implemented in Italy resulting in a negative impact on Eni’s results of operations and liquidity. Management cannot exclude that similar measures will be implemented in future years

Gas release measures are administrative acts whereby Eni is obliged to dispose of certain amounts of gas at set prices and conditions as provided in the relevant gas release measure. Those measures are intended to increase flexibility and liquidity in the gas market. This measure strongly affected Eni’s marketing activity in Italy. In 2004, based on certain agreements with the Antitrust Authority, Eni released in a four-year period a total amount of 9.2 BCM (2.3 BCM/y between October 1, 2004 and September 30, 2008) and the related transport capacity. In addition, in 2007 Eni agreed to adhere to a new gas release program involving 4 BCM which were disposed of in a two-year period (from October 1, 2007 and September 30, 2009). For thermal year 2009/2010 Italian Law No. 99/2009 introduced a new obligation for Eni to make additional sales for a total of 5 BCM of gas in yearly and half-yearly amounts. Although the allotment procedure (bid) was based on a minimum price set by the Ministry for Economic Development as proposed by the Authority for Electricity and Gas only a 1.1 BCM portion of the gas release was awarded out of the 5 BCM which had been planned. The price set by the Ministry is lower than the average price of Eni’s sales in Italy.

For the next few years, based on indications made by the AEEG (in a report to the Parliament on the situation of the gas and electricity market in Italy as provided in Resolution PAS 3/2010), Eni cannot exclude the possibility that new gas release programs will be imposed on it. As a consequence, future results and cash flows could be negatively affected.

The Italian Government, Parliament and the regulatory authorities in Italy and in Europe may take further steps to increase competition in the Italian natural gas market and such regulatory developments may adversely affect Eni’s results of operations and cash flows

Italian institutionaladministrative and governmental institutions and political forces are urging a higher degree of competition in the Italian natural gas market and this may produce significant developments in this area. A brief description follows of certain recently enacted laws and certain proceedings before the Authority for Electricity and Gas and the Italian Antitrust Authority in order to allow investors to gain some insight into the complexity of this

15


matter. For a full discussion of laws and procedures described herein see "Item 4 – Regulation of the Italian Hydrocarbons Industry – Gas & Power".

InItalian Parliament is required to enact the third European Directive on the gas market No. 73 by March 2011. The Directive prescribes that member states choose one of two options for ensuring carriers’ independence in case transport systems belong to a vertically integrated company. One of these options provides that a parent company involved in both gas production and marketing and transport divests its interests in the carrier subsidiary. Eni currently owns a majority stake in the Italian carrier company Snam Rete Gas which owns and manages approximately 97% of the Italian natural gas transport infrastructure (Eni’s share being 52.54%). Following an internal reorganization, Snam Rete Gas also manages all of Eni’s activities in the distribution sector and in storage. See "Item 4 – Gas & Power – Reorganization of the regulated businesses in Italy". Eni is not able to predict developments on this matter.

Also in 2003, Law No. 290 was enacted in Italy which prohibits Eni from holding an interest higher than 20% in undertakings owning natural gas transport infrastructure in Italy (Eni currently holds a 50.04%52.54% interest in Snam Rete Gas, which owns and manages approximately 97% of the Italian natural gas transport infrastructure)Gas). A decree is expected to be enacted by the Italian Prime Minister to establish the relevant provisions to implement this mandatory disposal. The deadline for the disposal, which was initially scheduled for December 31, 2008, is to be re-

12


scheduledre-scheduled in a 24-month term starting fromdeadline following enactment of the date in which this decree from the Italian Prime Minister becomes effective.Minister. Currently, Eni is unable to foreseepredict a deadline for this disposal.

OnIn recent years, both the basis of a joint inquiry conducted from 2003 through June 2004 on the Italian natural gas market, the Authority for Electricity and Gas and the Italian Antitrust Authority (the "Antitrust Authority") concluded thathave conducted several reviews and inquiries on the Italian natural gas market, targeting the overall level of competition of the Italian natural gas market, the degree of opening to competition of the residential sector, levels of entry-exit barriers, and other areas such as sub-investment in the storage sector. Virtually the entire storage capacity belong to Eni through its indirect interest in Stoccaggi Gas Italia SpA, which is unsatisfactory duewolly owned by Snam Rete Gas SpA. In 2009, the Italian Antitrust commenced an inquiry targeting the possible existence of entry barriers in the residential sector and alleged anti-competitive practices on the part of sellers which are integrated in the activity of gas distribution, including Eni and the subsidiary Italgas (which is wolly owned by Snam Rete Gas SpA). See Note 28 to the dominant position held by Eni in many phasesConsolidated Financial Statements for a full description of the natural gas chain. According to bothsuch proceeding. Both the Authority for Electricity and Gas and the Antitrust Authority both believe that the vertical integration of Eni in the supply, transport, distribution, storage and storagemarketing of gas has restrictedmay hamper the development of competition in Italy notwithstanding the antitrust ceilings introduced by Legislative Decree No. 164/2000. It was further stated that the price of natural gas in Italy (in particular for the industrial sector) is higher than in other European countries. In order to implement a Law Decree defined by the Italian Government to face the economic downturn, in March 2009 the Authority for Electricity and Gas proposed certain rules on the Italian gas market designed to increase competition. These rules provide that Eni supplies to the market preset amounts of natural gas at fixed prices. Implementation of these rules could materially and adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and cash flow.

In November 2006, the Authority for Electricity and Gas concluded an inquiry concerning the competitive behavior of operators selling natural gas to residential and commercial customers. This inquiry found that the retailing market for natural gas in Italy lacked a sufficient degree of competition due to current commercial practices and the existence of both entry and exit barriers.

In November 2007, the Italian Authority for Electricity and Gas and the Italian Antitrust Authority opened an inquiry to gain insight into the functioning of the natural gas storage activity in Italy, particularly with regard to lack of investments by operators directed to expand capacity to store natural gas in Italy. Eni through its wholly-owned subsidiary Stogit Italia owns almost the entire storage capacity currently existing in Italy.

Management believes the institutional debate on the degree of competition in the Italian natural gas market and the regulatory activity to be areas of attention and cannot exclude negative impacts deriving from developments on these matters on Eni’s future results of operations and cash flows.

Decisions of the Authority for Electricity and Gas on the matter of natural gas tariffs may diminish Eni’s ability to determine the price at which it sells natural gas to customers

On the basis of certain legislative provisions, the Authority for Electricity and Gas ("the Authority") holds a general monitoring power on pricing in the natural gas market in Italy and the power to establish selling tariffs for supplying natural gas to residential and commercial users consuming less than 200,000 CM/y (qualified as non eligible customers at December 31, 2002 as defined by Legislative Decree No. 164/2000) taking into account, among other things, the public interest of containing inflationary pressure due to rising energy costs. The decisions of the Authority on these matters may limit the ability of Eni to pass an increase in the purchase cost of natural gas on to the final consumers. Following a complex and lengthy administrative procedure started in 2004 and finalized in March 2007 with Resolution No. 79/2007, the Authority established a new indexation mechanism for updating the raw material cost component in supplies to residential and commercial users consuming less than 200,000 CM/y, establishing, among other things: (i) that an increase in the international price of Brent crude oil is only partially transferred to residential and commercial users of natural gas in case international prices of Brent crude oil exceed the 35 dollars per barrel threshold; and (ii) that Italian natural gas importers – including Eni – must renegotiate wholesale supply contracts in order to take account of this new indexation mechanism. Management cannot exclude the possibility that in the future the Authority could implement similar measures that may negatively affect Eni results of operations and liquidity.

Certain provisions of law may also limit the Company’s ability to set commercial margins. Specifically, Law Decree No. 112 enacted in June 2008 forbids energy companies such as Eni to transfer on to customers, through higher prices, the higher income taxes incurred in connection with a supplemental tax rate of 5.5 percentage points introduced by the same decree on energy companies with a yearly turnover in excess of euro 25 million. The Authority for Electricity and Gas is in charge of monitoring compliance with the rule. The Authority has subsequently that energy companies have to adopt effective operational and monitoring systems in order to prevent the transfer to customers by means of unlawful variations of final prices of gas.

For more information on these issues (particularly the Authority’s Decisions No. 248/2004, 134/2006 and 79/2007) see "Item 4 – Regulation – Gas & Power".

 

Antitrust and competition law

The Group’s activities are subject to antitrust and competition laws and regulations in many countries of operations, especially in Europe. In the years prior to 2008, Eni recorded significant loss provisions due to unfavorable developments in certain antitrust proceedings before the Italian Antitrust Authority, and the European

13


Commission. It is possible that the Group may incur significant loss provisions in future years relative to ongoing antitrust proceedings or possible new proceedings. The Group is particularly exposed to this risk in its natural gas and refining and marketing activities due to its large presencethe fact that Eni is the incumbent operator in thesethose markets in Italy and in Europe.a large European gas player. See Note 2928 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a full description of Eni’s main pending antitrust proceedings. Particularly, as a result ofOur main antitrust matter relates to an inquiry onongoing proceeding before the level ofEuropean Commission with respect to alleged anti-competitive practices designed to harm competition in the European natural gas market on March 9, 2009 the European Commission sent Eni a Statementin violation of Objections related to a proceeding under Article No. 82 of the EU Treaty and Article No. 54 of the SEE agreement with reference to anSEE. The proceeding involved Eni and other European players. Eni received a statement of objections from the European Commission which alleged unjustifiable refusalthat during the 2000-2005 period Eni was responsible for limiting the access of accessthird parties to the TAG and TENP/Transitgas gas pipelines that are interconnected withTAG, TENP and Transitgas, thus restricting gas availability in Italy. On February 4, 2010, Eni formally submitted the ItalianEuropean Commission a set of structural remedies relating certain international gas transport system through actions intendedpipelines. With prior agreement from its partners, Eni committed to "capacity hoarding, capacity degradation and strategic limitationdispose of investment" with the effect of "hindering the development of a real competitionits interests in the downstream marketGerman TENP, in the Swiss Transitgas and […] harmingin the consumers".Austrian TAG gas pipelines. The European Commission envisagesintends to submit these remedies to a market test. In case the possibleCommission approves those remedies upon conclusion of the market test, Eni will be in the position to settle the matter without imposition of aany fine and of structural remedies. or other remedial measures.

Based on available information and its knowledge of the proceeding, the Company is currently unable to determine the outcome of the matter.

16


Furthermore, based on the findings of antitrust proceedings, plaintiffs could seek payment to compensate for any alleged damages as a result of antitrust business practices on part of Eni. Both these risks could adversely affect the Group’s future results of operations and cash flows.

 

Environmental, Health and Safety Regulation

Eni may incur material operating expenses and expenditures in relation to compliance with applicable environmental, health and safety regulations

Eni is subject to numerous EU, international, national, regional and local environmental, health and safety laws and regulations concerning its oil and gas operations, products and other activities. In particular,Generally, these laws and regulations require the acquisition of a permit before drilling for hydrocarbons may commence, restrict the types, quantities and concentration of various substances that can be released into the environment in connection with exploration, drilling and production activities, as well as refining, petrochemicals and other Group operations, limit or prohibit drilling activities in certain protected areas, provide for measures to be taken to protect the safety of the workplace and health of communities involved by the company’s activities, and impose criminal or civil liabilities for polluting the environment or harming employees or communities health and safety resulting from oil, natural gas, refining, petrochemical and other Group’s operations.

These laws and regulations may also restrictregulate emissions of substances and pollutants, handling of hazardous materials and discharges to surface and subsurface water resulting from the operation of oil and natural gas extraction and processing plants, petrochemical plants, refineries, service stations, vessels, oil carriers, pipeline systems and other facilities owned by Eni. In addition, Eni’s operations are subject to laws and regulations relating to the production, handling, transportation, storage, disposal and treatment of waste materials. Breach of environmental, health and safety laws exposes the Company’s employees to criminal and civil liability and the Company to the incurrence of liabilities associated with compensation for environment health or safety damage. Additionally, in the case of violation of certain rules regarding safety in the workplace, the Company can be liable as provided for by a general EU rule on businesses liability due to negligent or willful conduct on part of their employees as adopted in Italy with Law Decree No. 231/2001.

Environmental, health and safety laws and regulations have a substantial impact on Eni’s operations. Management expects that the Group will continue to incur significant amounts of operating expenses and expenditures to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, also taking into account possible future developments in environmental regulations in Italy and in other countries where Eni operates, particularly thecurrent and proposed fuel and product specifications, emission controls and implementation of increasingly strict measures decided at both international and country level to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. For more discussion about this topic see "Item 4 – Environmental regulations".

Eni’s results of operations and financial condition are exposed to risks deriving from environmental, health and safety accidents and liabilities

Risks of environmental, health and safety incidences and liabilities are inherent in many of Eni’s operations and products. Notwithstanding management believesmanagement's belief that Eni adopts high operational standards to ensure safety of its operations and to protect the environment and health of people and employees, it is always possible that incidents like blow-outs, spillovers,spill-overs, contaminations and similar events could occur that would result in damage to the environment, employees and communities. In particular,Environmental laws also require the Company to remediate and clean-up the environmental impacts of prior disposals or releases of chemicals or petroleum substances and pollutants by the Company. Such contingent liabilities may exist for various sites that the Company disposed of, closed or shut-down in prior years where the Group products have been produced, processed, stored, distributed or sold, such as chemicals plants, mineral-metallurgic plants, refineries and other facilities. Particularly, Eni is performing a number of remedial actionsplans to restore and clean-up certain industrial sites that were contaminated by the Group’s industrial activities in previous years, mainly in Italy. Management expects further remedialRemedial actions are expected to be implementedcontinue in the foreseeable future, years. Theimpacting our liquidity as the Group has accrued risk provisions to cope with all existing environmental liabilities whereby both a legal or constructive obligation to perform a clean-up or other remedial actions is in place and the associated costs can be reasonably estimated. The accrued amount represents the management’s best estimates of future environmental expenses to be incurred. In 2009, the Company’s environmental provision increased by euro 280 million.

Notwithstanding this, management believes that it is possible that in the future Eni may incur significant environmental expenses and liabilities in addition to the amounts already accrued due to: (i) the chance of as yet

14


unknown contamination; (ii) the results of on-going surveys or surveys to be carried out on the environmental status of certain Eni’s industrial sites as required by the applicable regulations on contaminated site; (iii) unfavorable

17


developments in ongoing litigation on the environmental status of certain Company’s site where a number of public administrations and the Italian Ministry for environment act as plaintiffs; (iv) the possibility that new litigation might arise; and (v) the probability that new and stricter environmental laws might be implemented.implemented; and (vi) the circumstance that the extent and cost of future environmental restoration and remediation programs are often inherently difficult to estimate.

 

Legal Proceedings

Eni is party to a number of civil actions and administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. In 2009, we increased our legal proceeding provision by euro 372 million due to the business.estimated probable losses associated with ongoing litigations. Of that amount, euro 250 million related to the possible resolution of the investigation related to the TSKJ consortium based on the current status of the ongoing discussions with U.S. Authorities. The matter is fully disclosed in the section "Legal Proceedings" in Note 28 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. This estimate in particular should be read in light of the qualifications set forth in the last sentence of this paragraph. In addition to existing provisions accrued as of the balance sheet date to account for ongoing proceedings, it is possible that in future years Eni may incur significant losses in addition to amounts already accrued in connection with pending legal proceedings due to: (i) uncertainty regarding the final outcome of each proceeding; (ii) the occurrence of new developments that management could not take into consideration when evaluating the likely outcome of each proceeding in order to accrue the risk provisions as of the date of the latest financial statements; (iii) the emergence of new evidence and information; and (iv) underestimation of probable future losses.losses due to the circumstance that they are often inherently difficult to estimate.

 

Risks related to Changes in the Price of Oil, Natural Gas, Refined Products and Chemicals

Operating results in Eni’s Exploration & Production, Refining & Marketing, and Petrochemical segments are affected by changes in the price of crude oil and by movements in crude oil prices on margins of refined and petrochemical products.

Eni’s results of operations are affected by changes in international oil prices

Overall, lower oil prices have a net adverse impact on Eni’s results of operations. The effect of lower oil prices on Eni’s average realizations for produced oil is generally immediate. Furthermore, Eni’s average realizations for produced oil differ from the price of Brent crude marker primarily due to the circumstance that Eni’s production slate, which also includes heavy crude qualities, has a lower API gravity compared with Brent crude (when processed the latter allows for higher yields of valuable products compared to heavy crude qualities, hence higher market price).

The favorable impact of higher oil prices on Eni’s results of operations may be offset in part by different trends in margins for Eni’s downstream businesses

The impact of changes in crude oil prices on Eni’s downstream businesses, including the Gas & Power, the Refining & Marketing and the Petrochemical businesses, depends upon the speed at which the prices of gas and products adjust to reflect these changes. Wholesale margins in the Gas & Power business are substantially independent from fluctuations in crude oil prices as purchase and selling prices of natural gas are contractually indexed to prices of crude oil and certain refined products according to similar pricing schemes. However, quarterly performance and year-to-year comparability of results of Eni’s natural gas business may be somewhat affected by the indexation mechanism of the raw material component in gas supplies to residential customers and certain resellers to residentialsresidential customers in Italy in accordance with applicable regulations from the Italian Authority for Electricity and Gas as outlined above in the risk factor describing the "Liberalization of the Italian Natural Gas Market".Gas. Specifically, this indexation mechanism provides a certain time lag between movements in the price of crude oil and the related adjustment to the selling price of natural gas. For a detailed discussion of this indexation mechanism in Italy see "Item 4 – Regulation – Gas & Power – Natural gas prices".

In the Refining & Marketing and Petrochemical businesses a time lag exists between movements in oil prices and in prices of finished products.

18


Eni’s results of operations are affected by changes in European refining margins

The resultsResults of operations of the Eni’s Refining & Marketing segment are substantially affected by changes in European refining margins which reflect changes in relative prices of crude oil and refined products as outlined above. The prices of refined products in turn depend on global and regional supply/demand balances, inventory levels, refinery operations, import/export balances and weather. Furthermore, Eni’s realized margins are also affected by relative price movements of heavy crude qualities vs. light crude qualities, taking into account the ability of Eni’s refineries to process complex crudes that representrepresents a cost advantage when market prices of heavy crudes are relatively cheaper than the marker Brent price. In 2009, Eni expects thatrefining margins decreased substantially due to the rapid recovery in oil prices which the Company was unable to transfer on to final prices of refined products due to weak demand, for productshigh worldwide and regional inventory levels and excess refining capacity. Also, Eni’s results of operation in its refining segment were affected by narrowing price differentialsdifferential between heavy and light crudes onescrude qualities resulting in poor margins on complex throughputs. Management does not expect any significant recovery in industry fundamentals in 2010. The sector as a whole will negatively affectcontinue to suffer from weak demand and excess capacity, while the performancecost of Eni’soil feedstock is seen rising and price differentials to remain compressed. In this context, management expects that the Company refining operations.margins will remain at below break-even levels.

15


Eni’s results of operations are affected by changes in petrochemical margins

Eni’s margins on petrochemical products are affected by trends in demand for petrochemical products and changes in oil prices which influence changes in purchase costs of petroleum-based feedstock. Given the commoditized nature of Eni petrochemical products, it is difficult for the Company to transfer higher purchase costs for oil-based feedstock to selling prices to customers. In 2008,2009, the profitability of Eni’s petrochemical segment was significantly affected by lower selling margins for commodity petrochemical products due to higherhigh purchase costs for oil-based feedstock that were not fully transferred to selling prices of products, in the first half of the year and, subsequently byas well as weak demand for petrochemical products.and competitive pressures. These negative factors also triggered asset impairments. Management’s outlook for 2009 is also2010 remains challenging, as industry fundamentals are not expected to improve substantially. Weak demand, competition, and management does not expect any significant improvementhigh oil-based feedstock costs will continue to negatively affect Eni’s results of operations and liquidity in the trading environment from 2008 and possibly a further contraction in margins on petrochemical products.this business segment.

 

Risks from Acquisitions

Eni constantly monitors the oil and gas market in search of opportunities to acquire individual assets or corporations in order to achieve its growth targets or complement its asset portfolio. Acquisitions entail an execution risk – thean important risk, among other matters, that the acquirer will not be able to effectively integrate the purchased assets so as to achieve expected synergies. In addition, acquisitions entail a financial risk – the risk of not being able to recover the purchase costs of acquired assets, in case a prolonged decline in the market prices of oil and natural gas occurs. We also incur unanticipated costs or assume unexpected liabilities and losses in connection with companies or assets we acquire. If the integration and financial risks connected to acquisitions materialize our financial performance may be adversely affected.

 

Credit risk

Credit risk is the potential exposure of the Group to losses in case counterparties fail to perform or pay amounts due. Credit risks arise from both commercial partners and financial ones. Although the Group has nevernot experienced in the past material non-performance from its counterparties, due to the severity of the current economic and financial crisis it is possible that we may experience a higher than normal level of counterparty failure. In our consolidated financial statements for the year 2008, we accrued an allowance against doubtful accounts amounting to euro 251 million more than doubling the allowance made a year earlier. In 2009 Consolidated Financial Statements we made a further allowance for doubtful accounts amounting to euro 260 million, mainly relating to the Gas & Power business. Management believes that the Gas & Power business is particularly exposed to the ongoing impacts of the economic and financial crisis due to its large and diversified customer base which include a large number of middle and small businesses and retail customers.

 

Exchange Rates

Movements in the exchange rate of the euro against the U.S. dollar can have a material impact on Eni’s results of operations. Prices of oil, natural gas and refined products generally are denominated in, or linked to, U.S. dollars, while a significant portion of Eni’s expenses are denominated in euros. Similarly, prices of Eni’s petrochemical

19


products are generally denominated in, or linked to, the euro, whereas expenses in the Petrochemical segment are denominated both in euros and U.S. dollars. Accordingly, a depreciation of the U.S. dollar against the euro generally has an adverse impact on Eni results of operations and liquidity because it reduces booked revenues by an amount greater than the decrease in dollar-denominated expenses. The Exploration & Production segment is particularly affected by movements in the U.S. dollar vs. the euro exchange rates. In 2008, Eni’s operating profit in this business segment has been impacted by an estimated amount of euro 1.2 billion due to a 7.3% depreciation of the U.S. dollar versus the euro. This trend reversed in 2009 resulting in an addition to reported operating profit which was estimated in euro 500 million.

 

Risks deriving from Eni’s Exposure to Weather Conditions

Significant changes in weather conditions in Italy and in the rest of Europe from year to year may affect demand for natural gas and some refined products; in colder years, demand is higher. Accordingly, the results of operations of the Gas & Power segment and, to a lesser extent, the Refining & Marketing segment, as well as the comparability of results over different periods may be affected by such changes in weather conditions.

Furthermore, our operations, particularly offshore production of oil and natural gas, are exposed to extreme weather phenomena that can result in material disruption to our operations and consequent loss or damage of properties and facilities.

 

Interest Rates

Interest on Eni’s finance debt is primarily indexed at a spread to benchmark rates such as the Europe Interbank Offered Rate, "Euribor", and the London Interbank Offered Rate, "Libor". As a consequence, movements in interest rates can have a material impact on Eni’s finance expense in respect to its finance debt.

16


Critical Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements requires management to make certain accounting estimates that are characterized by a high degree of uncertainty, complexity and judgment. These estimates affect the reported amount of the Company’s assets and liabilities, as well as the reported amount of the Company’s income and expenses for a given period. Although management believes these estimates to represent the best outcome of the estimation process, actual results could differ from such estimates, due to, among other things, the following factors: uncertainty, lack or limited availability of information; the availability of new informative elements, variations in economic conditions such as prices, significant factors (e.g. removal technologies and costs) and the final outcome of legal, environmental or regulatory proceedings. See "Item 5 – Critical Accounting Estimates".

 

Item 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

History and Development of the Company

Eni SpA with its consolidated subsidiaries is engaged in the oil and gas, electricitypower generation, petrochemicals, oilfield services and engineering industries. Eni has operations in about 7077 countries and 78,88078,417 employees as of December 31, 2008.2009.

Eni, the former Ente Nazionale Idrocarburi, a public law agency, established by Law No. 136 of February 10, 1953, was transformed into a joint stock company by Law Decree No. 333 published in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Italy No. 162 of July 11, 1992 (converted into law on August 8, 1992, by Law No. 359, published in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Italy No. 190 of August 13, 1992). The Shareholders’ Meeting of August 7, 1992 resolved that the company be called Eni SpA. Eni is registered at the Companies Register of Rome, register tax identification number 00484960588, R.E.A. Rome No. 756453. Eni is expected to remain in existence until December 31, 2100; its duration can however be extended by resolution of the shareholders.

20


Eni’s registered head office is located at Piazzale Enrico Mattei 1, Rome, Italy (telephone number: +39-0659821). Eni branches are located in:

• San Donato Milanese (Milan), Via Emilia, 1; and


• San Donato Milanese (Milan), Piazza Ezio Vanoni, 1.

Internet address: www.eni.it.www.eni.com.

The name of the agent of Eni in the United States is De Luca Vincenzo, 485 Madison Ave.,Avenue, New York, NY 10002.

Eni’s principal segments of operations are described below.

Eni’s Exploration & Production segment engages in oil and natural gas exploration and field development and production, as well as LNG operations in 3940 countries, including Italy, the UK, Norway, Libya, Egypt, Norway, the UK, Angola, Nigeria, Congo, the U.S., Kazakhstan, Russia Algeria, Pakistan and Australia. In 2008, Eni’s production of oil and natural gas amounted to 1,7482009, Eni produced 1,716 KBOE/d on an available-for-saleavailable for-sale basis. As of December 31, 2008,2009, Eni’s total proved reserves of subsidiaries stood at 6,2426,209 mmBOE; Eni’s share of reserves of equity-accounted entities amounted to 666362 mmBOE. In 2008,2009, Eni’s Exploration & Production segment reported net sales from operations (including inter-segment sales) of euro 33,31823,801 million and operating profit of euro 16,4159,120 million.

Eni’s Gas & Power segment engages in supply, transport, distribution, storage, re-gasification and marketing of natural gas, as well as ofelectricity and LNG. This segment also includes the activity of power generation that enables Eniis ancillary to extract further value from gas, diversifying its commercial outlets.the marketing of electricity. In 2008,2009, Eni’s worldwide sales of natural gas amounted to 104.23103.72 BCM, including 6.006.17 BCM of gas sales made directly by the Eni’s Exploration & Production segment in Europe and the U.S. Sales in Italy amounted to 52.8740.04 BCM, while sales in European markets were 43.0355.45 BCM that included 11.2510.48 BCM of gas sold to certain importers to Italy. SalesIn 2009, following the reorganization of the regulated businesses the parent company Eni SpA concluded the sale of the entire share capital of its fully-owned subsidiaries Italgas SpA and Stoccaggi Gas Italia SpA to markets outside Europe amounted to 2.33 BCM. Through its 50.0352.54 per cent-owned subsidiary Snam Rete Gas.

Through Snam Rete Gas, Eni operates an Italian network of high and medium pressure pipelines for natural gas transport that is approximately 31,474-kilometer31,531-kilometer long, while outside Italy Eni holds capacity entitlements on a network of European pipelines extending for approximately 4,400 kilometers made up of high pressure pipelines to import gas from Russia, Algeria, Libya and North Europe production basins to European markets. Eni,Snam Rete Gas, through its 100 percent-owned subsidiary Italgas and other subsidiaries, is engaged in natural gas distribution activity in Italy serving 1,3201,322 municipalities through a low pressure network consisting of approximately 49,40049,973 kilometers of pipelines as of December 31, 2008.2009. Snam Rete Gas, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Stoccaggi Gas Italia operates in natural gas storage activities in Italy through eight storage fields. Eni produces electricitypower and steam at its operated sites of Livorno, Taranto, Mantova, Ravenna, Brindisi, Ferrera Erbognone and Ferrara with a total installed capacity of 4.95.3 GW as of December 31, 2008.2009. In 2008,2009, sales of electricitypower totaled 29.9333.96 TWh. Eni operates a re-gasification terminal in Italy and holds indirect interest or capacity entitlements in a number of LNG facilities in

17


Europe, Egypt and in certain projects under construction in the U.S. In 2008,2009, Eni’s Gas & Power segment reported net sales from operations (including inter-segment sales) of euro 36,93630,447 million and operating profit of euro 3,9333,687 million.

Eni’s Refining & Marketing segment engages in refining and marketing of petroleum products mainly in Italy and in the rest of Europe. In 2008,2009, processed volumes of crude oil and other feedstock amounted to 35.8434.55 mmtonnes and sales of refined products were 50.6845.59 mmtonnes, of which 28.9226.68 mmtonnes in Italy. Retail sales of refined product at operated service stations amounted to 12.6712.02 mmtonnes including Italy and the rest of Europe. In 2008,2009, Eni’s retail market share in Italy through its Agip-branded network of service stations was 30.6%31.5%. In 2008,2009, Eni’s Refining & Marketing segment reported net sales from operations (including inter-segment sales) of euro 45,08331,769 million and operating net loss of euro 1,023102 million.

Eni’s petrochemical activities include production of olefins and aromatics, basic intermediate products, polyethylene, polystyrenes, and elastomers. Eni’s petrochemical operations are concentrated in Italy and Western Europe. In 2008,2009, Eni sold 4.74.3 mmtonnes of petrochemical products. In 2008,2009, Eni’s Petrochemical segment reported net sales from operations (including inter-segment sales) of euro 6,3034,203 million and an operating net loss of euro 822675 million.

Eni’s oilfield services, construction and engineering activities are conducted through its 42.91 per cent-owned subsidiary Saipem and Saipem’s controlled entities. Activities involve offshore construction, particularly fixed platform installation, sub-sea pipe laying and floating production systems and onshore construction. Offshore and onshore drilling services and engineering and project management services are also provided to the oil and gas, refining and petrochemical industries. In 2008,2009, Eni’s Engineering & Construction segment reported net sales from operations (including intra-group sales) of euro 9,1769,664 million and operating profit of euro 1,045881 million.

A list of Eni’s subsidiaries of Eni is included as an exhibit to this Annual Report on Form 20-F.

21


Strategy

Eni’s strategy is to grow the Company’s main businesses over both the medium and the long-term, with improving profitability. This strategy has remained unchanged in spite of the current2009 economic downturn and an uncertain outlookperspectives for the global energy demand. Specifically, the Company is planning for:

growing profitably oil and gas production in the Exploration & Production business;
preserving profitability in the Gas & Power business by leveraging on the Company’s competitive position on the European market in spite of an uncertain demand outlook and increasing competition;
improving profitability and cash generation in the Refining & Marketing business by implementing cost reduction initiatives and tightly selecting our capital projects in the face of a difficult trading environment, also boosting profitability of marketing operations;
improving revenues and profitability in our Engineering & Construction business leveraging on our strong order backlog and technologically-advanced assets; and
managing efficiently and effectively our petrochemicals business.

In executing this strategy, management intends to preserve a solid capital structure targeting an optimal mix between net borrowingspursue integration opportunities among businesses and shareholders’ equity. By this means, management expectswithin them and to maintain the Company’s current credit rating.strongly focus on efficiency improvement through technology upgrading, cost efficiencies, commercial and supply optimization and continuing process streamlining across all businesses. Over the next four-years, Eni plans to execute a capital expenditure program amounting to euro 48.852.8 billion to support continuing organic growth.growth in its businesses. In 2010, Eni plans to invest approximately euro 14 billion, an amount roughly in line with 2009. Eni plans to fund thisthose capital expenditure program mostlyplans mainly by means of cash flows provided by operating activities. Capital projects will be assessed and implemented in accordance with tight financial criteria. Those will be the levers whereby the Company intends to preserve a solid capital structure targeting an optimal mix between net borrowings and shareholders’ equity. The Company intends to remunerate its shareholders through significanta progressive dividend distributions so aspolicy. In 2010 management plans to ensuredistribute a dividend in line with 2009. In subsequent years, dividends are planned to its shareholders competitivebe increased in line with OECD inflation. This dividend yields (measured aspolicy is based on the ratioCompany’s planning assumptions of dividend to the share price recorded on averageBrent oil prices at $65 per barrel flat in the monthnext four years and other assumptions (see “Item 5 – Management’s Expectations of DecemberOperations” and “Item 3 – Risk Factors”).

Further details on the Italian stock exchange). Management intends to support the Company’s profitability by focusing on cost reduction initiatives, including a number of actions that will be implemented in order to benefit from the expected reduction in purchase costs for oilfield materials, equipment and services in the Exploration and Production segment.each business segment strategy are discussed throughout this item. For a description of risks and uncertainties associated with the Company’s outlook and the capital expenditure program See "Item 5 – Management’s Expectations of Operations".

Eni’s strategy in its Exploration & Production operations is to grow production leveraging on the development of the Company’s asset portfolio. Eni targets to achieve a production growth rate of 3.5% on average over the 2009-2012 period, assuming Eni’s Brent price scenario of 55 U.S. dollar per barrel in 2012. For a discussion of Eni’s production volume sensitivity to oil prices see "Item 5 – Management’sManagement of Expectations of Operations". Management will continue to assess opportunities to increase production through acquisitions. Eni intends to pay special attention to reserve replacement in order to secure the medium to long-term sustainability of its business.

In its Gas & Power activities, Eni intends to grow natural gas sales in the international market, preserve the profitability of the Italian marketing business, effectively manage regulated businesses, and develop a global LNG business. Due to the current economic downturn, the Company has revised down its long-term growth expectations for the European gas demand from 3% to 2% per annum until 2020. For a description of trends in the natural gas markets see "Gas & Power" below. The impact of a worsening demand outlook and increasing competitive pressure on Eni’s results of operations on the domestic market is expected to be offset by the contribution of regulated businesses and continuing growth in European markets, mainly driven by the integration of the recently acquired Belgian company Distrigas. Eni targets worldwide gas sales of 124 BCM in 2012, including E&P sales in Europe and the U.S. In particular, Eni targets to achieve an annual average growth rate of 7% in international sales in the four-year period 2009 to 2012. The Company’s strategy contemplates a further strengthening of Eni’s presence in the European market, leveraging on the synergies expected from the acquisition of Distrigas (for further details see below – "Significant business and portfolio developments"). The integration with upstream activities will provide the Gas & Power business with opportunities to monetize the equity gas reserves and develop LNG sales.

18


In its Refining & Marketing activities, the Company’s strategy focuses on improving the business profitability and reducing the cash requirements of the business by means of strict capital discipline also in light of a weak outlook for refined products demand. The Company intends to selectively upgrade its refinery system and improve quality standards in marketing activities as well as increase operating efficiency. In refining Eni plans to increase the conversion index and flexibility of plants in order to achieve a higher yield of middle distillates and increase the ability of its refineries to process less valuable crudes. In marketing, Eni intends to strengthen its leadership position in the Italian retail market trough plant upgrading, loyalty programs and enhanced non-oil service formats. In Europe, Eni’s growth strategy will continue to be selective, focusing on those markets where it can leverage on scale, supply and logistic synergies and brand awareness.

In its Engineering & Construction activities, Eni aims at developing and expanding its geographical reach and technical characteristics of its world class fleet in order to maintain its strong competitive position and reduce its exposure to the cyclicality of the oil industry.

In technological research and innovation activities, Eni plans to implement significant capital expenditures amounting to euro 1.11.4 billion in the next four years to develop such technologies that management believes may ensure competitive advantages in the long-term. Eni plans to continue developing ongoing programs focused on reducing costs to find and recover hydrocarbons, developing clean fuels, upgrading heavy crude (in particular the EST project), monetizing natural gas through projects such as high pressure high distance gas transmission (TAP) and Gas to Liquids (GTL), and protecting the environment by investing in the fields of renewable sources of energy and reduction of GHG emissions.

 

Significant businessBusiness and Portfolio Developments

The significant business and portfolio developments that occurred in 20082009 and to date in 20092010 were the following:

 In January 2008,2010, Eni completedleading a consortium of international companies and the acquisitionIraqi National Oil Companies, South Oil Co and Missan Oil Co signed a technical service contract, under a 20-year term with an option for further 5 years, to develop the Zubair oil field (Eni 32.8%). The field was awarded in October 2009 to the Eni-led consortium following a successful first bid round and was offered under a competitive bid starting on June 30, 2009. The partners of the entire issued share capitalproject plan to gradually increase production to a target plateau level of 1.2 mmBOE/d by 2016. The contract provides that the UK-basedconsortium will earn a remuneration fee on the incremental oil company Burren Energy Plc, forproduction once production has been raised by 10 percent from its current level of approximately 180,000 BBL of oil per day and will recover its expenditures through a total cash consideration amounting to approximately euro 2.4 billion (including Burren’s shares purchased in 2007, for a total amount of euro 0.6 billion). In 2008 production of Burren assets averaged 25 KBBL/d in Congo and Turkmenistan.cost recovery mechanism based on the revenues from the field production.
 In October 2008, all the international parties to the North Caspian Sea Production Sharing Agreement (NCSPSA) consortiumJanuary 2010, Eni and the Kazakh authorities signed the final agreement implementing the new contractual and governance framework of the Kashagan project, based on the Memorandum of Understanding signed on January 14, 2008. Eni’s management expects to achieve first oil at the Kashagan field by the end of 2012.
In October 2008, following authorization from the European Commission, Eni closed the acquisition of a 57.243% majority stake in the Belgian company Distrigas NV from the French company Suez-Tractebel. The deal entailed cash consideration of euro 2.75 billion. On December 30, 2008, Eni was granted authorization from the Belgian market authorities to execute a mandatory tender offer on the minority shareholders of Distrigas. On March 19, 2009, the mandatory tender offer on the minority shareholders of Distrigas was finalized. Shareholders representing 41.61% of the share capital of Distrigas tendered 292,390 shares on Eni’s offer. Publigaz Scrl tendered its entire interest (31.25%). On April 8, 2009 Eni paid to those shareholders cash consideration amounting to euro 1,991 million. Following the tender offer, Eni owned 98.86% of the share capital of Distrigas. The squeeze-out on the residual 1.14% was completed in early May. Consequently Eni now holds all the shares of Distrigas except for one share belonging to the Belgian State with special powers. Distrigas shares have been delisted from Euronext Brussels.
In October 2008, EniVenezuelan National Oil Company PDVSA signed an agreement for the joint development of the giant field Junin 5 with Suez related to35 BBBL of certified heavy oil in place, located in the saleOrinoco oil belt. Production start-up is planned for 2013 at an initial level of 75 KBBL/d and a numberlong term production plateau of Eni’s assets as well as long-term gas240 KBOE/d is targeted. Development will be conducted through an "Empresa Mixta" (Eni 40%, PDVSA 60%). At the time of the establishment of the Empresa Mixta Eni will disburse a bonus of $300 million, and electricity supply contracts. Asfurther $346 million will be paid upon the achievement of end of December 2008 the following agreements have been finalized: (i) the Virtual Power Plantcertain project milestones. The agreement that grants Suez the right to off-take volumes of electricity corresponding to capacity of up to 1,100 MW for a period of 20 years, with proceeds of euro 1.21 billion; (ii) gas supply contracts up to 4 BCM/y to be delivered in Italy for a period of 20 years andalso includes an option to purchase up to 2.5 BCM/y to be delivereddeploy Eni’s proprietary technology in Germany for a period of 11 years, with proceeds amounting to euro 255 million; (iii) supply contracts for 0.9 BCM/y of LNG for a period of 20 years at a price of euro 87 million; (iv) on October 30, 2008 the Eni fully-owned subsidiary Italgas and the partner Suez signed a purchase and sale contract regarding an asset identified as the gas distribution network of the city of Rome and certain nearby municipalities owned by Italgas. The contract is a final one which validity is conditional upon approval by the Municipal body of the city of Rome to be granted not later than August 31, 2009 regarding the change in the entity who will act as operator of the service concession arrangement in place as a consequence of the closing of the contract; and (v) a number of contracts were also signedhydrogenation for the divestmentconversion of heavy oils. Finally, Eni will present a number of upstream exploration and production concessions in the UK, the Gulf of Mexico, Egypt and Indonesia entailing cash consideration up to euro 273 million. Closing of the contracts regarding properties in Egypt and Indonesia is conditional upon approval from relevant local Authorities, while contracts have been closed regarding the sale of properties in the UK and the Gulf of Mexico.
In November 2008, Eni finalized an agreement to acquire all the common shares of First Calgary Petroleums Ltd, a Canadian oil and gas company with exploration and development activities in Algeria.

19


The acquisition values the fully diluted share capital of First Calgary at approximately euro 605 million. Production start-up is expected in 2011 with a projected plateau of approximately 30 KBOE/d net to Eni by 2012.

In addition, in 2008 Eni completed the following transactions:

In February 2008, Eni signed a strategic agreement with the Venezuelan State oil company PDVSA for the definition of a plan to develop a field located in the Orinoco oil belt, with a gross acreage of 670 square kilometers.
In February 2008, as part of the announced plan to dispose of non core assets, Eni sold its 30% interest in Gaztransport & Technigaz SA (GTT), a company owning a patentproject for the construction of tanks for LNG transport, to Hellman & Friedman for a total value of euro 310 million.
In June 2008, Eni finalized a strategic oil transaction with the Libyan national oil company based on the framework agreement of October 2007. This transaction effective from January 1, 2008, extends the duration of Eni’s oil and gas properties in Libya until 2042 and 2047 respectively and lays the foundations for a number of projects targeting development of the significant gas potentialpower plant in the country.Guiria peninsula.

22


 In April 2008, Eni signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the state-owned company Qatar Petroleum International to target joint investment opportunities in the exploration and production of oil and gas.
In May 2008, Eni defined a cooperation agreement with the Republic of Congo for the extraction of unconventional oil from the Tchikatanga and Tchikatanga-Makola oil sands deposits with over extension of 1,790 square kilometers. Eni plans to monetize the heavy oil by applying its EST (Eni Slurry Technology) proprietary technology intended to convert entirely the heavy barrel into high-quality light products. The agreement also comprises the construction of a new 450 MW electricity generation plant (Eni’s share 20%) to be fired by 2009 with the associated natural gas from the operated M’Boundi field and a partnership for the production of bio-diesel.
In July 2008, Eni renewed the Memorandum of Understanding with Brazilian oil company Petrobras for the evaluation of joint initiatives in the upstream and downstream sectors, to produce and market renewable fuels and the possible options for the valorization of the natural gas reserves discovered by Eni offshore Brazil.
In September 2008, Eni finalized the purchase of a 17% stake in the share capital of Gaz de Bordeaux SAS active in the marketing of natural gas in the Bordeaux area. Eni’s associate Altergaz (Eni’s interest being 38.91%) also entered the transaction with an equal stake. The two partners signed also a long-term agreement for the supply of 250 mmCM/y of gas for ten years to Gas de Bordeaux.
In September 2008, Eni signed a strategic agreement with Petroleos de Venezuela, SA (PDVSA) for the exploration and development of two offshore Venezuelan areas and the subsequent development of gas resources via an LNG project.
In October 2008, Eni completed the divestment of the entire share capital of the subsidiary Eni Agip España to Galp Energia SGPS SA following the exercise of a call option in October 2007, pursuant to agreements among Galp’s shareholders. The divested asset includes 371 service stations as well as wholesale marketing activities of oil products located in the Iberian Peninsula.
In October 2008, Eni signed a partnership agreement with Papua New Guinea for the exploration of oil and gas and identification of opportunities to develop the Country’s resources. Eni is also interested to joint opportunities related to power generation projects and the development of alternative and existing renewable energies.
In November 2008, Eni finalized an agreement with the British company Tullow Oil Ltd to purchase a 52% stake and the operatorship of fields in the Hewett Unit and relevant facilities in the North Sea in close proximity to the Interconnector pipeline. Eni plans to upgrade certain depleted fields in the area so as to achieve a gas storage facility with a 177 BCF capacity to support seasonal upswings in gas demand in the UK.
In November 2008, Eni finalized a Memorandum of Understanding with Colombia’s state oil company Ecopetrol to evaluate joint exploration opportunities.

Recent developments are described below.

On April 7, 2009, Gazprom exercised its call option to purchase thea 20% interest in OAO Gazprom Neft held by Eni followingbased on the existing agreements between the two partners. The 20% interest in Gazprom Neft was acquiredexercise price of the call option collected by Eni on April 24, 2009 amounting to euro 3,070 million is equal to the price ($3.7 billion) outlined in the bid procedure held on April 4, 2007 as part of a bid procedure for the assets of bankrupt Russian company Yukos. The exercise price of the call option is equal to the bid price (U.S. $3.7 billion)Yukos as adjusted by subtracting dividends distributed and adding the contractual yearly remuneration of 9.4% on the capital employed and financing collateral expenses. AtA gain amounting to euro 172 million was recognized in the same time,profit of the period as remuneration of the capital invested and recovery of collateral expenses.
In September 2009, Eni and its Italian partner Enel in the 60-40% owned joint-venture OOO SeverEnergia completed the divestment of a 51% stake in the venture to Gazprom signed new cooperation agreements targeting certain development projects to be conducted jointly in Russia and other countries of interest. Terms ofbased on the call option grantedexercised by the Russian company. Eni collected euro 155 million (or $230 million at the EUR/USD exchange rate of 1.48 as of the transaction date) corresponding to Gazpromapproximately 25% of the whole amount of the transaction ($940 million net to purchase a 51% interestEni). The remaining 75%, amounting to euro 526 million (or approximately $710 million at the EUR/USD exchange rate of 1.35 as of the transaction date) was collected on March 31, 2010. A gain amounting to euro 100 million was recognized in the share capitalprofit for the year 2009. The gain was associated with interest income at an annual rate of OOO SeverEnergia (Eni’s interest being 60%), which owns 100% of three Russian companies engaging9.4% accruing on the initial investment in the developmentventure when it was acquired on April 4, 2007 based on the contractual arrangements between Eni and Gazprom. The three partners are committed to producing first gas from the Samburskoye field by June 2011, targeting a production plateau of 150 KBOE/d within two years from the start of production.

In addition, in 2009 Eni closed the following transactions:

In February 2009, Eni signed the project for the feasibility study addressing the utilization of associated gas reserves, are currently under review by Eni, Enelfeeding a new onshore power plant and Gazprom.upstream sector initiatives in the Angola onshore basins, as well as other projects in sustainability. Similar agreements were made in Egypt, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Pakistan.
 On FebruaryMay 12, 2009 Eni’s BoardEni and the Ministry for Oil of Directors approvedEgypt agreed on a ten-year extension of the divestmentconcession for the giant Belayim field. Eni will invest approximately $1.5 billion over the next five years to execute development expenditures, upgrading actions and operating costs.
On May 15, 2009 Eni and Gazprom have agreed upon a new scope of 100%work in the development project of Italgas SpAthe South Stream pipeline, aimed at increasing its transport capacity from an originally planned amount of 31 BCM/y to 63 BCM. Eni and Stoccaggi Gas Italia SpA (Stogit)Gazprom confirmed their full commitment to Snam Rete Gas (50.03% owned by Eni) for totaldeveloping the project which, if the ongoing feasibility study produces a positive outcome, will build a new route to supply Russian gas to Europe.
In June 2009, Eni finalized the acquisition from Quicksilver Resources Inc of a 27.5% interest in the Alliance area, in Northern Texas, covering approximately 53 square kilometers, with gas shale reserves. Quicksilver will retain the 72.5% of the interests and operatorship of the properties. The cash consideration of euro 4,720 million (euro 3,070 million and euro 1,650 million, respectively).for the transaction amounted to $280 million. The transactionexpected production from the acquired assets will beamount to 4,000 BOE/d net to Eni for the full year 2009, ramping up to approximately 10,000 BOE/d by 2011.

20


 financed by Snam Rete Gas through: (i) a rights issue up to a maximum of euro 3.5 billion (Eni has already committed to subscribeIn October 2009, Eni and its relative sharecommercial partners in Turkey and Russia, working on the construction of the rights issue);Samsun-Ceyhan pipeline, signed a Memorandum of Understanding committing to discuss the definition of the economic and (ii) new mediumcontractual conditions for Russian companies to long-term financingparticipate in the Samsun-Ceyhan Project in order to ensure the volume of crude that would guarantee the economic sustainability of the project. On the same occasion, representatives of the governments of Italy, Turkey and Russia reaffirmed their support to the project which will build a by-pass to facilitate safer transport across the Bosphorus and Dardanelles Straits as well as reduce the impact on the region’s complex and delicate ecosystem.
In November 2009, Eni was awarded a 37.8% stake in the Indonesian Sanga Sanga license for euro 1.3 billion.the production of coal bed methane. Recent preliminary studies in the block showed a resource potential of about 3,920 BCF of gas to be verified through an appraisal program that will commence in 2010.
In November 2009, Eni and the Kazakh National Oil Company KazMunayGas signed a co-operation agreement for initiatives in the fields of developing, explorating and producing hydrocarbon resources and industrial facilities in the Country. Under the agreement, Eni and KazMunayGas will jointly execute exploration studies, studies for the optimization of gas usage in Kazakhstan and the evaluation of a number of industrial initiatives including the upgrading of the Pavlodar refinery, in which KMG holds a majority interest.
In December 2009, Eni signed a memorandum of understanding with Turkmenistan aimed at promoting and reinforcing the partnership in the development of the oil industry of the Country. Eni will co-operate with the State companies and Agency for Hydrocarbons to carry out studies to ascertain the oil and gas potential of the country. Eni will contribute its expertise in technology and the sustainability field.
In January 2010, Eni signed an agreement for the acquisition of a number of marketing activities of refined products in Austria, including a retail network of 135 service stations, wholesale activities as well as commercial assets in aviation business and complementary logistic and storage activities. The main impacts expected on Eni’s consolidated financial statements whenfinalization of the transaction closes will be: (i) a decrease of euro 1.5 billion in net borrowings and a corresponding increase in total equity as a consequenceis subject to the approval of the pro-quota subscription of the Snam Rete Gas capital increase by the minoritiy shareholders; and (ii) a decrease in Eni’s net profit equal to 45% of the aggregate net profit of Italgas and Stogit, with a corresponding increase in net profit attributable to minoritiy shareholders. From an industrial perspective the transaction, expected to close in July 2009, will create significant synergies in the regulated businesses segment and maximize the value of Italgas and Stogit due to the higher visibility of regulated businesses as a part of Snam Rete Gas.relevant antitrust authorities.

23


In 2009, capital expenditures amounted to euro 13,695 million, of which 86% related to the Exploration & Production, Gas & Power and Refining & Marketing businesses, and primarily related to: (i) the development of oil and gas reserves (euro 7,478 million) deployed mainly in Kazakhstan, the United States, Egypt, Congo, Italy and Angola, and exploration projects (euro 1,228 million) carried out mainly in the United States, Libya, Egypt, Norway and Angola; (ii) the acquisition of proved and unproved properties amounting to euro 697 million mainly related to the acquisition of a 27.5% interest in assets with gas shale reserves from Quicksilver Resources Inc and extension of the duration of oil and gas properties in Egypt following the agreement signed in May 2009; (iii) the development and upgrading of Eni’s natural gas transport and distribution networks in Italy (euro 919 million and euro 278 million, respectively) as well as the development and increase of the storage capacity (euro 282 million); (iv) projects aimed at improving the conversion capacity and flexibility of refineries, and at building and upgrading service stations in Italy and outside Italy (totaling euro 608 million); and (v) the upgrading of the fleet used in the Engineering & Construction segment (euro 1,630 million).

In 2009, Eni’s acquisitions amounted to euro 2.32 billion and mainly related to the completion of the acquisition of Distrigas NV. Following the acquisition of the 57.243% majority stake in the Belgian company Distrigas NV from French company Suez-Gaz de France, Eni made an unconditional mandatory public takeover bid on the minorities of Distrigas (42.76% stake). On March 19, 2009, the mandatory tender offer on the minorities of Distrigas was finalized. Shareholders representing 41.61% of the share capital of Distrigas, including the second largest shareholder, Publigaz SCRL with a 31.25% interest, tendered their shares. The squeeze-out of the residual 1.14% of the share capital was finalized on May 4, 2009. After this, Distrigas shares have been delisted from Euronext Brussels. The total cash consideration amounted to approximately euro 2.05 billion.

In 2008, capital expenditures amounted to euro 14,562 million, of which 84% related to the Exploration & Production, Gas & Power and Refining & Marketing segmentsdivisions and mainly related to:concerned mainly: (i) the development of oil and gas reserves (euro 6,429 million) deployed mainly in Kazakhstan, Egypt, Angola, Congo and Italy and exploration projects (euro 1,918 million), primarily in the United States, Egypt, Nigeria, Angola and Libya; (ii) the purchase of proved and unproved property for euro 836 million related mainly to the extension of mineral rights in Libya following an agreement signed in October 2007 with the state company NOC and the purchase of a 34.81% interest in the ABO project in Nigeria; (iii) the development and upgrading of Eni’s natural gas transport and distribution networks in Italy (euro 1,130 million and euro 233 million, respectively) and upgrading of natural gas import pipelines to Italy (euro 233 million); (iv) the ongoing construction of combined cycle power plants (euro 107 million); (v) projects designed to upgrade the conversion capacity and flexibility of Eni’s refineries, including construction of a new hydrocracking unit at the Sannazzaro refinery, and to build of new service stations and upgrade of existing ones in Italy and outside Italy (totaling euro 965 million); and (vi) the upgrading of the fleet used in the Engineering & Construction division (euro 2,027 million).

In 2008, Eni’s acquisitions amounted to euro 5.85 billion (euro 4.3 billion net of acquired cash of euro 1.54 billion) and mainly related to: (i) the acquisition of the 57.243% majority stake in Distrigas NV; (ii) the completion of the acquisition of Burren Energy Plc; (iii) the purchases of certain upstream properties and gas storage assets, related to the entire share capital of the Canadian company First Calgary operating in Algeria, a 52% stake in the Hewett Unit in the North Sea, a 20% stake in the Indian company Hindustan Oil Exploration Co; and (iv) other investments in non-consolidated entities mainly related to funding requirements for an LNG project in Angola.

In 2007, capital expenditures amounted to euro 10,593 million, of which 84.7% related to the Exploration & Production, Gas & Power and Refining & Marketing businesses, and primarily related to: (i) the development of oil and gas reserves (euro 4,788 million) deployed predominantly in Kazakhstan, Egypt, Angola, Italy and Congo, and exploration projects (euro 1,659 million) particularly in the Gulf of Mexico, Egypt, Norway, Nigeria and Brazil; (ii) development and upgrading of Eni’s natural gas transport and distribution networks in Italy (euro 886 million) as well as upgrading of natural gas import pipelines to Italy (euro 253 million); (iii) the ongoing construction of combined cycle power plants (euro 175 million); (iv) projects designed to upgrade the conversion capacity and flexibility of Eni’s refineries, including construction of a new hydrocracking unit at the Sannazzaro refinery, and to build and upgrade service stations (totaling euro 979 million); and (v) the upgrading of the fleet used in the Engineering & Construction segment (euro 1,410 million).

In 2007, Eni’s acquisitions amounted to euro 9.7 billion and mainly related to: (i) a 60% interest in three Russian gas companies as part of the liquidation procedure of bankrupt Russian company Yukos. Through the same transaction Eni also purchased a 20% stake in the oil and gas company OAO Gazprom Neft. Gazprom was granted a call option to purchase a 51% interest in those three gas companies and the 20% stake in OAO Gazprom Neft; (ii) the purchase of upstream assets in the Gulf of Mexico; (iii) the purchase of upstream assets onshore Congo; (iv) the purchase of a 24.9% interest in Burren Energy; (v) the acquisition of a further 16.11% stake in the Ceska Rafinerska in the Czech Republic increasing Eni’s ownership interest to 32.4%; (vi) the purchase of 102 retail fuel stations and related marketing assets located in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary; and (vii) the purchase of a 13.6% stake in the Angola LNG consortium.

24


BUSINESS OVERVIEW

Exploration & Production

Eni’s Exploration & Production segment engages in oil and natural gas exploration and field development and production, as well as LNG operations, in 3940 countries, including Italy, Libya, Egypt, Norway, the UK, Angola, Congo, the U.S., Kazakhstan, Russia, Algeria, PakistanAustralia, Venezuela and Australia.Iraq. In 2008,2009, Eni produced 1,7481,716 KBOE/d on an available for-sale basis. As of December 31, 2008,2009, Eni’s total proved reserves amounted to 6,571 mmBOE; proved reserves of subsidiaries stood at 6,2426,209 mmBOE; Eni’Eni’s share of reserves of equity-accounted entities amounted to 666362 mmBOE.

21


Eni’s strategy in its Exploration & Production operations is to increasepursue profitable production growth leveraging on the Company’s portfolio of assets and pipeline of development of its asset portfolio. Eni plansprojects. We plan to achieve a production growth rate of 3.5%higher than 2.5% on average over the 2009-2012 period, under2010-2013 periods, targeting a production level in excess of 2 mmBOE/d based on our long-term Brent price assumptions of 65 $/BBL and certain other trading environment assumptions (See "Item 5 – Management’s Expectations of Operations"). A descriptionincluding an indication of Eni’s production volume sensitivity to oil prices iswhich are disclosed under "Item 5 – Management’s Expectations of Operations".

Future growth will be driven Management plans to achieve that target via organic developments, leveraging on the Company’s asset portfolio. We plan to achieve 75% of that production level by continuing production ramp-up at our existing fields and 25% by successfully starting to production 41 new fields that based on management estimates are forecast to add up to 560 KBOE/d to the developmentCompany’s production level by 2013. We have already sanctioned half of new projects locatedand expect to sanction a further 40% in a number of strategic oil2010. Management plans to maximize product contribution from existing fields, particularly those with long-life cycles, by applying its advanced recovery technologies, reservoir management capabilities and gas basins in the world, namely the Caspian Region, North and West Africa and the Gulf of Mexico. A high-quality portfolio geographically focused and resilient, with one of the lowest breakeven prices in the industry, high exposureimplementing actions to the most competitive giant projects and long-standing relationships with key host countries will enable any to deliver industry-leading growth even in current market conditions. Management will continue to evaluate opportunities to increase production through focused acquisitions. offset natural field depletion.

Eni intends to pay special attention to reserve replacement in order to guaranteeensure the medium-to long-term sustainability of itsthe business. Eni intends to optimize its portfolio of development properties by focusing on areas where its presence is established, seeking new opportunities and divesting non-strategic or marginal assets. Eni also intends to develop itscertain LNG businessproject in order to monetize its large base of gas reserves mainly in NorthWest Africa. We also plan to exercise tight cost control by achieving cost efficiencies associated with scale of operations and West Africa.leveraging on our well-established presence in areas such as Africa where we believe development and production costs are lower than in other areas and increasing exposure to operated-projects.

In exploration activities, Eni intends to concentrate resourcesexpenditures in well established areas of presence where availability of production facilities and existing competenciesknow-how and long-term relationships with host countriescompetencies will enable Enithe Company to readily put in production discovered reserves, reducing the time-to-market and capturing synergies.achieving cost efficiencies. Approximately 80%45% of planned capitalexploration expenditures will be directed to such core areas (located mainly in the United States, Libya, Angola, Nigeria, Norway, Egypt, Libya, Nigeria, Angola, Italy, NorwayCongo and Congo)Indonesia). Eni also plans to selectively pursue high risk/high reward opportunities arising from expansion in areas with high mineral potential.potential and to appraise the resource potential in recently entered areas like Gabon and Ghana. Eni expects to purchase new exploration permits and to divest or exit marginal or non strategic ones.areas.

In order to execute these strategies, Eni intendsManagement plans to invest approximately euro 32.637 billion on reserve developmentto explore for and field optimization as well as exploration projectsdevelop new reserves over the next four-year period;four years; approximately euro 1.80.5 billion of which will be spent to build transportation infrastructures and execute LNG projects through equity-accounted entities.

In 2009, oil and gas prices are expected to be significantly lower than 2008. In response Eni For the year 2010, management plans to improve profitability of its operations by implementing a number of initiatives designed to reduce costs to developspend euro 10.5 billion in reserves development and operate oil and gas fields by leveraging on the expected reduction in purchase costs of oilfield services, materials and equipment due to the economic downturn. Management has yet to commit a large amount of future development expenditures and plans to be able to benefit from ongoing downward trends in rates of oilfield services and purchase costs of goods and equipment. Additional cost control measures will address ongoing operations. The amount of planned capital expenditures for the years 2009-2012 already factors in the benefits associated with cost control. See "Item 3 – Risk Factors".exploration projects.

 

Disclosure of Reserves

Overview

The Company has adopted comprehensive classification criteria for the estimate of proved, proved developed and proved undeveloped oil and gas reserves in accordance with applicable U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) regulations, as provided for in Regulation S-X, Rule 4-10. Proved oil and gas reserves are those quantities of liquids (including condensates and natural gas liquids) and natural gas which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, under existing economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulations prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain.

Oil and Natural Gas natural gas prices used in the estimate of proved reserves are obtained from the official survey published by Platt’s Marketwire, except when their calculation derives from existing contractual conditions.

25


Prices are calculated as the unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within the 12-month period prior to the end of the reporting period. Prices include consideration of changes in existing prices provided only by contractual arrangements. In prior periods, year-end liquids and natural gas prices were used in the estimate of proved reserves in accordance with then applicable rules.

Engineering estimates of the Company’s oil and gas reserves are inherently uncertain. Although authoritative guidelines exist regarding engineering criteria that have to be met before estimated oil and gas reserves can be designated as "proved", the accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data and engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. Consequently, the estimated proved reserves of oil and natural gas may be subject to future revision and upward and downward revisions may be made to the initial booking of reserves due to analysis of new information. Proved reserves to which Eni is entitled under concession contracts are determined by applying Eni’s share of production to total proved reserves of the contractual area, in respect of the duration of the relevant mineral right. Proved reserves to which Eni is entitled under Production Sharing Agreements are calculated so that the sale of production entitlements should cover expenses incurred by the Group to develop a field (cost oil) and on the profit oil set contractually (profit oil). A similar scheme applies to buy-back and service contracts.

Reserves Governance

Eni has always exercised centralized rigorous control over the process of booking of proved reserves.

The ReserveReserves Department of the Exploration & Production segmentDivision is entrusted with the task of: (i) ensuring the periodic certification process of proved reserves; (ii) continuously updating the Company’s guidelines regardingon reserves evaluation. The department monitorsevaluation and classification and the periodic estimation process. Company guidelines follow Regulation S-X Rule 4-10internal procedures; and (iii) providing training of staff involved in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as well as on specific issues not regulated by the SEC rules, the established practice endorsed by qualified institutions on the marketplace. process of reserves estimation.

Company guidelines have been reviewed by DeGolyer and MacNaughton (D&M), an independent petroleum engineering company, which has certifiedaffirmed their compliance with applicablethe SEC rules.rules2; D&M has also stated that the Companycompany formal guidelines, regulate situations for which thewhenever SEC rules are less precise, providingdo not provide specific prescription, provide a reasonable interpretation in line with the generally accepted practices in international markets.the industry. When participating in exploration and production activities operated by otherothers entities, Eni also estimates its proved reserves on the basis of the above guidelines.

The process for evaluating reserves, as described in the internal procedure, involves: (i) business unit managersmanager (geographic units) and Local ReserveReserves Evaluators (LRE), who perform the evaluation and classification of reserves including estimates of production profiles, capital expenditures, operating costs and costs related to asset retirement obligations; (ii) geographic area managers at head offices checking evaluationsevaluation carried out by business unit managers; (iii) the Planning and (iii)Control Department which provides the economic evaluation of reserves; and (iv) the Reserve Department which, through Division Reserves Evaluators (DRE), provides independent reviews of the fairness and correctness of classifications carried out by businessthe above mentioned units and aggregates worldwide reserve data and performs an economic assessmentdata.

The head of reserves to calculate equity volumes. Moreover, the Reserve Department attended the "Politecnico di Torino" and received a Master of Science degree in Mining Engineering in 1985. She has more than 20 years of experience in the responsibility to ensureoil and gas industry and more than 10 years of experience specifically in evaluating reserves.

Staff involved in the periodic certification process of reserves and to update continuously the Company guidelines on reserves evaluation process fulfill the professional qualifications requested and classification.maintain the highest level of independence, objectivity and confidentiality in accordance with professional roles of conduct. Eni’s Reserves Evaluators qualifications comply with international standards established by the Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Reserves independent evaluation

Since 1991, Eni has requested qualified independent oil engineering companies to carry out an independent evaluationaudit23 of its proved reserves on a rotationalrolling basis. Eni believes those independent evaluators to be experienced


(2)iFrom 1991 to 2002 DeGolyer and MacNaughton, from 2003 also Ryder Scott.

22


and qualifiedThe description of qualifications of the person primarily responsible for the reserve audit is included in the marketplace.third party audit report4. In the preparation of their reports, those independent evaluators relied,rely, without independent verification, upon information furnished by Eni with respect to property interest,interests, production, current costcosts of operationoperations and development, sale agreements, relating to future operations and sale, prices and other factual information and data that were accepted as represented by the independent evaluators. This information wasdata, equally used by


(2)See "Item 19 – Exhibits".
(3)From 1991 to 2002, DeGolyer and MacNaughton; from 2003, also Ryder Scott Co.
(4)See "Item 19 – Exhibits".

26


Eni in determining its proved reserves and included log,internal process, include logs, directional surveys, core and PVT (Pressure Volume Temperature) analysis, maps, oil/gas/water production/injection data of wells, reservoir and field, reservoir studies;studies, technical analysis relevant to field performance, reservoir performance, long-term development plans, future capital and operating costs.

In order to calculate the economic value of Eni equity reserves, net present value (NPV), actual prices received fromapplicable to hydrocarbon sales, instructions on future prices,price adjustments required by applicable contractual arrangements and other pertinent information are provided. Accordingly, Eni believes that the work performed by theIn 2009, Ryder Scott Co and DeGolyer and MacNaughton provided an independent evaluators is to be considered an evaluation of Eni’s proved reserves carried out in parallel with the internal evaluation. The circumstance that the independent evaluations achieved the same results as those of the Company for the vast majority of fields support management’s confidence that the company’s booked reserves meet the regulatory definition of proved reserves which are reasonably certain to be produced in the future. When the assessment of independent engineers is lower than internal evaluations, Eni revises its estimates based on information provided by independent evaluators. In any case, those differences were not significant.

In 2008, a total of 1.5 BBOE of proved reserves of subsidiaries have been evaluated, representing approximately 25%almost 28% of Eni’s total proved reserves as of subsidiaries at December 31, 2008. 20095, confirming, as in previous years, the reasonableness of Eni’s internal evaluations6.

In the 2006-20082007-2009 three-year period, 76%86% of Eni’sEni total proved reserves of subsidiaries were subject to independent evaluations.evaluation. As atof December 31, 20082009 among the most important of Eni’sEni properties, the only property which werewas not subject to an independent evaluation were: Bourireview was Barbara (Italy).

Summary of proved oil and Bu Attifel (Libya), Barbara (Italy), M’Boundi (Congo)gas reserves

The tables below provide a summary of proved oil and Elgin-Franklin (United Kingdom)gas reserves of the Group companies and its equity-accounted entities by geographic area for the three years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007. Reserves data for 2009 is based on the unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within the 12-month period prior to the end of the reporting period. Data for 2008 and 2007 are based on the last day price of the Company’s fiscal year in accordance with then applicable rules.

HYDROCARBONS

(mmBOE)

Italy

Rest
of Europe

North Africa

West Africa

Kazakhstan

Rest of Asia

Americas

Australia and Oceania

Total consolidated subsidiaries

Equity-accounted entities

Total












Year ended
Dec. 31, 2007
 747 638 1,879 1,095 1,061 198 259 133 6,010 668 6,678
Developed 534 537 1,183 766 494 127 158 63 3,862 101 3,963
Undeveloped 213 101 696 329 567 71 101 70 2,148 567 2,715
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Year ended
Dec. 31, 2008
 681 525 1,922 1,146 1,336 265 235 132 6,242 666 6,908
Developed 465 417 1,229 827 647 168 133 62 3,948 107 4,055
Undeveloped 216 108 693 319 689 97 102 70 2,294 559 2,853
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Year ended
Dec. 31, 2009
 703 590 1,922 1,141 1,221 236 263 133 6,209 362 6,571
Developed 490 432 1,266 799 614 139 168 122 4,030 74 4,104
Undeveloped 213 158 656 342 607 97 95 11 2,179 288 2,467
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LIQUIDS

(mmBBL)

Italy

Rest
of Europe

North Africa

West Africa

Kazakhstan

Rest of Asia

Americas

Australia and Oceania

Total consolidated subsidiaries

Equity-accounted entities

Total












Year ended
Dec. 31, 2007
 215 345 878 725 753 44 138 29 3,127 142 3,269
Developed 133 299 649 511 219 35 81 26 1,953 26 1,979
Undeveloped 82 46 229 214 534 9 57 3 1,174 116 1,290
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Year ended
Dec. 31, 2008
 186 277 823 783 911 106 131 26 3,243 142 3,385
Developed 111 222 613 576 298 92 74 23 2,009 33 2,042
Undeveloped 75 55 210 207 613 14 57 3 1,234 109 1,343
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Year ended
Dec. 31, 2009
 233 351 895 770 849 94 153 32 3,377 86 3,463
Developed 141 218 659 544 291 45 80 23 2,001 34 2,035
Undeveloped 92 133 236 226 558 49 73 9 1,376 52 1,428
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

(5)Includes Eni’s share of proved reserves of equity-accounted entities.
(6)From 1991 to 2002, DeGolyer and MacNaughton; from 2003, also Ryder Scott.

27


NATURAL GAS

(BCF)

Italy

Rest
of Europe

North Africa

West Africa

Kazakhstan

Rest of Asia

Americas

Australia and Oceania

Total consolidated subsidiaries

Equity-accounted entities

Total












Year ended
Dec. 31, 2007
 3,057 1,675 5,751 2,122 1,770 880 696 598 16,549 3,022 19,571
Developed 2,304 1,364 3,065 1,469 1,580 530 442 213 10,967 428 11,395
Undeveloped 753 311 2,686 653 190 350 254 385 5,582 2,594 8,176
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Year ended
Dec. 31, 2008
 2,844 1,421 6,311 2,084 2,437 911 600 606 17,214 3,015 20,229
Developed 2,031 1,122 3,537 1,443 2,005 439 340 221 11,138 420 11,558
Undeveloped 813 299 2,774 641 432 472 260 385 6,076 2,595 8,671
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Year ended
Dec. 31, 2009
 2,704 1,380 5,894 2,127 2,139 814 629 575 16,262 1,588 17,850
Developed 2,001 1,231 3,486 1,463 1,859 539 506 565 11,650 234 11,884
Undeveloped 703 149 2,408 664 280 275 123 10 4,612 1,354 5,966
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Volumes of oil and natural gas applicable to long-term supply agreements with foreign governments in mineral assets where Eni is operator totaled 674 mmBOE as of December 31, 2009 (679 and 676 mmBOE as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively). Said volumes are not included in reserves volumes shown in the table herein.

Activity of the year

Subsidiaries

Equity-accounted entities



 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

 
 
 
 
 
 
(mmBOE)
Additions to proved reserves 237  882  605  639  6  (296)
of which purchases and sales                  
of reserves-in-place 156  32  25  617     (314)
Production for the year (627) (650) (638) (7) (8) (8)
  

 

 

 

 

 

Subsidiaries


 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

 
 
 
(%)
Proved reserves replacement ratio of subsidiaries 38 136 95
  
 
 

Eni’s proved reserves of subsidiaries atas of December 31, 20082009 totaled 6,2426,209 mmBOE (oil and condensates 3,2433,377 mmBBL; natural gas 17,21416,262 BCF) representing an increasea decrease of 23233 mmBOE, or 3.9%5.3%, from December 31, 2007.2008. Additions to proved reserves booked by Eni’s subsidiaries in 20082009 were 850605 mmBOE derivingand derived from: (i) revisions of previous estimates (261 mmBOE) mainly reported in Egypt, Italy, Congo, the United Kingdom and the United States which were partly offset by the unfavorable effect of 746 mmBOE, partly related to higher oil prices on reserve entitlements reported in certain PSAs (up 340and buy-back contracts (down 100 mmBOE) resulting from lower year endhigher oil prices from a year ago (Brent(the Brent price used in the reserve estimation process was $36.55 per barrel at December 31, 200859.9 $/BBL in 2009 compared to $96.02 per barrel at December 31, 2007), net of downward36.5 $/BBL in 2008). Higher oil prices also resulted in upward revisions associated with improved economics of marginal productions in certain mature fields such as Angola, Kazakhstan and Libya;productions; (ii) extensions and discoveries (71(282 mmBOE), with majormain increases bookedreported in Angola, Egypt, Nigeria, Norway, Algeria, Iraq and United States; andLibya; (iii) improved recovery (33(37 mmBOE) mainly reported in Angola, Norway and Libya; and (iv) purchases and sales of mineral in place (25 mmBOE).

The largest additions were related to following fields/projects: Goliat in Norway, CAFC and MLE in Algeria, Angola,Belayim in Egypt due to the new extension terms that were agreed upon with relevant Egyptian authorities, M’Boundi in Congo and Libya. Acquisitions amountedBahr Essalam in Libya as a result of continuing development activities and revisions as well as Zubair in Iraq due to 91 mmBOE reflecting the contributionsigning of the acquired Burren assets in Congo, Turkmenistan and India. Sales of reserves (59 mmBOE)technical service contract.

Acquisitions for 26 mmBOE related mainly to the divestment of a 1.71%27.5% stake purchased from Quicksilver Resources Inc in the Kashagan project following the finalization of the agreements implementing the new contractual and governance framework of the project effective January 1, 2008 (information on the Kashagan agreements is provided below under the section "Caspian Area" on page 39). Due to risks inherentAlliance area, in the exploration and production business, a degree of uncertainty still exists as to whether these additions will actually be produced. See "Item 3 – Risks associated with exploration and production of oil and natural gas" and – "Uncertainties in estimates of oil and natural gas reserves".Texas.

28


As of December 31, 20082009 Eni’s share of proved reserves of equity-accounted entities amounted to 666 mmBOE. The362 mmBOE, a decrease of 304 mmBOE compared to December 31, 2008, year end amounts comprise 60% of proved reserves ofmainly due to the three Russian gas companies purchased in 2007 as partdivestment of a bid procedure for assets of bankrupt Russian company Yukos. Terms of the call option granted to Gazprom to purchase a 51% intereststake in the share capital ofjoint venture OOO SeverEnergia (Eni’s interest beingwas 60%), which owns 100%currently 29.4%) after the call option exercised by Gazprom.

The new SEC rules allow the use of these three Russian companies engaging inreliable technology (i.e. seismic, wireline formation test, logs and core) to justify the developmentreserves estimate if it produces consistent and repeatable results. We did not have any material additions of gasproved reserves are currently under review by Eni, Eneldue to application of new reliable technologies.

Proved developed reserves of subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 amounted to 4,030 mmBOE (2,001 mmBBL of liquids and Gazprom.11,650 BCF of natural gas) representing 65% of total estimated proved reserves (63% and 64% as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively).

The reserve replacement ratio for Eni’s subsidiaries was 136%95% in 2008 (38%2009 (136% in 20072008 and 38% in 2006)2007). The average reserve life index for Eni’s subsidiaries was 9.6 years at December 31, 2008. The reserve replacement ratio was calculated by dividing additions to proved reserves by total production, each as derived from the tables of changes in proved reserves prepared in accordance with SFAS No. 69FASB Extractive Activities - Oil & Gas (Topic 932) (see the supplemental oil and gas information in the Consolidated Financial Statements). The reserve replacement ratio is a measure used by management to assess the extent to which produced reserves in the year are replaced by reserve additions booked according with SEC criteria under Rule 4-10 of Regulation S-X.booked. Management considers the reserve replacement ratio to be an important gauge of the abilityindicator of the Company to sustain its growth prospects. However, this ratio measures past performances and is not an indicator of future production because the ultimate development and productionrecovery of reserves is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. These include the risks associated with the successful completion of large-scale projects, including addressing ongoing regulatory issues and completion of infrastructure, as well as changes in oil and gas prices, political risks and geological and other environmental risks. Specifically, in recent years Eni’s reserves replacement produced reservesratio has been affected by the impact of higher year-end oil prices on reserves entitlements in the Company’s Production Sharing Agreements (PSAs) and similar contractual schemes. In accordance with such contracts, Eni is entitled to a portion of field reserves, the sale of which should cover expenditures incurred by the Company to develop and operate the field. The higher the reference prices for Brent crude oil used to determine year-end amounts of Eni’s proved reserves, the lower the number of barrels necessary to cover the same amount of expenditures. In 20082009 this negative trend reversed resultingresulted in a higherlower amount of booked reserves associated with the Company’s PSAs as the oil price recorded at 2008 year-end was loweraveraged higher than the previous year.

23


The table below show Eni’s calculations See "Item 3 – Risks associated with exploration and production of its reserve replacement ratios for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007oil and 2008.

Subsidiaries

Equity-accounted entities



 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

 
 
 
 
 
 
(mmBOE)
Additions to proved reserves 244  237  882  1  639  6 
of which purchases and sales of reserves-in-place (172) 156  32     617    
Production for the year (640) (627) (650) (6) (7) (8)






Subsidiaries


 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

 
 
 
(%)
Proved reserves replacement ratio of subsidiaries3838136



Proved developed reserves of subsidiaries at December 31, 2008 amounted to 3,948 mmBOE (2,009 mmBBL of liquidsnatural gas" and 11,138 BCF of natural gas) representing 63% of total estimated proved reserves (64% and 63% at December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively).

Volumes– "Uncertainties in estimates of oil and natural gas applicable to long-term supply agreements with foreign governments in mineral assets where Eni is operator totaled 679 mmBOEreserves".

The average reserve life index of Eni’s proved reserves was 10.2 years as of December 31, 2008 (6762009 which included reserves of both subsidiaries and 583 mmBOEequity-accounted entities.

Proved undeveloped reserves

Proved undeveloped reserves as of December 31, 20072009 totaled 2,467 mmBOE. At year-end, liquids proved undeveloped reserves amounted to 1,428 mmBBL, mainly concentrated in Africa and 2006, respectively). Said volumes are not includedKazakhstan. Natural gas proved undeveloped reserves accounted for 5,966 BCF, mainly located in Africa and Russia.

In 2009, total proved undeveloped reserves volumes showndecreased by 386 mmBOE. The main reasons for the variation are: (i) reclassification to proved developed reserves; (ii) divestment of a 51% stake in the table herein.joint-venture OOO SeverEnergia (Eni’s interest being 60%) after the call option exercised by Gazprom; and (iii) addition from new projects and revisions.

The tables below set forth a geographical breakdownDuring 2009, Eni converted approximately 370 mmBOE of Eni’s proved undeveloped reserves andto proved developed reserves of hydrocarbons, on a barrel of oil equivalent basis, for the periods indicated.

Proved reserves

Eni’s proved reserves of hydrocarbons by geographic area

Year ended December 31,

  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
(mmBOE)
Italy 805 747 681
North Africa 2,018 1,879 1,922
West Africa 1,122 1,095 1,146
North Sea 682 617 510
Caspian Area 1,219 1,061 1363
Rest of the World 554 611 620
Total consolidated subsidiaries 6,400 6,010 6,242
Equity-accounted entities 36 668 666



Eni’s proved reserves of liquids by geographic area

Year ended December 31,

  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
(mmBBL)
Italy 215 215 186
North Africa 982 878 823
West Africa 786 725 783
North Sea 386 345 276
Caspian Area 893 753 939
Rest of the World 195 211 236
Total consolidated subsidiaries 3,457 3,127 3,243
Equity-accounted entities 24 142 142



24


Eni’s proved reserves of natural gas by geographic area

Year ended December 31,

  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
(BCF)
Italy 3,391 3,057 2,844
North Africa 5,946 5,751 6,311
West Africa 1,927 2,122 2,084
North Sea 1,697 1,558 1,336
Caspian Area 1,874 1,770 2,437
Rest of the World 2,062 2,291 2,202
Total consolidated subsidiaries 16,897 16,549 17,214
Equity-accounted entities 68 3,022 3,015



Eni’sreserves. The main reclassification to proved developed were related to development activities and the start-up of the following fields: Blacktip (Australia), PY1 (India), Lennox (UK), Karachaganak (Kazakhstan), Longhorn (USA), Val d’Agri (Italia), and Poinsettia (Trinidad & Tobago).

Main additions of proved undeveloped reserves were recorded in Rest of hydrocarbons by geographic areaEurope, North Africa and Rest of Asia.

Year ended December 31,

  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
(mmBOE)
Italy 562 534 465
North Africa 1,242 1,183 1,229
West Africa 798 766 827
North Sea 571 524 407
Caspian Area 525 494 670
Rest of the World 334 361 350
Total consolidated subsidiaries 4,032 3,862 3,948
Equity-accounted entities 27 101 107



Eni’sIn 2009, capital expenditure amounted to approximately euro 2.2 billion and were made to progress the development of proved developedundeveloped reserves.

Reserves that remain proved undeveloped for five or more years are a result of several physical factors that affect the timing of the projects development and execution, such as the complex nature of the development project in adverse and remote locations, physical limitations of infrastructure or plant capacities and contractual limitations that establish production levels.

29


The Company estimates that approximately 0.8 BBOE of proved undeveloped reserves of liquids by geographic area

Year ended December 31,

  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
(mmBBL)
Italy 136 133 111
North Africa 713 649 613
West Africa 546 511 576
North Sea 329 299 222
Caspian Area 262 219 321
Rest of the World 140 142 166
Total consolidated subsidiaries 2,126 1,953 2,009
Equity-accounted entities 18 26 33



Eni’s proved developed reserves of natural gas by geographic area

Year ended December 31,

  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
(BCF)
Italy 2,449 2,304 2,031
North Africa 3,042 3,065 3,537
West Africa 1,447 1,469 1,443
North Sea 1,395 1,293 1,065
Caspian Area 1,511 1,580 2,006
Rest of the World 1,105 1,256 1,056
Total consolidated subsidiaries 10,949 10,967 11,138
Equity-accounted entities 48 428 420



25


Mineral Right Portfolio and ExplorationActivityhave remained undeveloped for the year

As of December 31, 2008, Eni’s mineral right portfolio consisted of 1,244 exclusivefive years or shared rights for exploration and development in 39 countries on five continents, for a total net acreage of 415,494 square kilometers (394,490 at December 31, 2007). Of these 39,244 square kilometers concerned production and development (37,642 at December 31, 2007). Outside Italy net acreage (395,085 square kilometers) increased by 21,258 square kilometers mainly duemore with respect to the acquisition of Burren Energy Plc for a total net explorationbalance sheet date, mainly related to the Kashagan project (Kazakhstan), where development activities are progressing and development acreage of 9,569 square kilometers (mainly in Turkmenistan, Yemen, Congo and Egypt) and an increase of net exploration acreage in Mali. These increases were partly offsetproduction start-up is expected by the contractual revision in Libya. In addition, new exploration leases were awarded in Angola, Algeria, Alaska, the Gulfend of Mexico, Gabon, Indonesia, Norway and the United Kingdom for a total acreage of 57,361 square kilometers (net to Eni, 99% operated).

In Italy, net acreage (20,409 square kilometers) declined by 255 square kilometers due to releases.

A total of 111 new exploratory wells were drilled in 2008 (58.4 of which represented Eni’s share), as compared to 81 exploratory wells completed in 2007 (43.5 of which represented Eni’s share). In addition, 21 exploratory wells were in progress at year end. The overall commercial success rate was 36.5% (43.4% net to Eni) as compared to 40% (38% net to Eni) in 2007. In 2006, 68 exploratory wells were completed (35.9 of which represented Eni’s share), with an overall success rate of 43% (the success rate of Eni’s share of exploratory wells was 49%).2012.

 

Delivery commitments

Eni sells crude oil and natural gas from its producing operations under a variety of contractual obligations. Some of these contracts, mostly relating to natural gas, specify the delivery of fixed and determinable quantities.

Eni is contractually committed under existing contracts or agreements to deliver over the next three years natural gas to third parties for a total of approximately 1,908 BCF from producing properties located in Australia, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Libya, Nigeria, Norway, Pakistan, Tunisia and the United Kingdom.

The sales contracts contain a mix of fixed and variable pricing formulas that are generally referenced to the market price for crude oil, natural gas or other petroleum products.

Management believes it can satisfy these contracts from quantities available from production of the company’s proved developed reserves and supplies from third parties based on existing contracts. Production will account for approximately 70% of delivery commitments.

Eni has met all contractual delivery commitments as of December 31, 2009.

Oil and gas production, production prices and production costs

The matters regarding future production, additions to reserves and related production costs and estimated reserves discussed below and elsewhere herein are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those in such forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties relating to future production and additions to reserves include political developments affecting the award of exploration or production interests or world supply and prices for oil and natural gas, or changes in the underlying economics of certain of Eni’s important hydrocarbons projects. Such risks and uncertainties relating to future production costs include delays or unexpected costs incurred in Eni’s production operations.

In 2008,2009, oil and natural gas production available for sale averaged 1,7481,716 KBOE/d (liquids 1,0261,007 KBBL/d; natural gas 4,1434,074 mmCF/d), an increaserepresenting a decline of 6432 KBOE/d from 2008, or 3.8%, compared to 2007. This improvement mainly came from the assets acquired1.8%. Excluding OPEC cuts (down 28 KBOE/d) production was barely unchanged. Lower production uplifts associated with weak European gas demand, unplanned facility downtime, continuing security issues in Nigeria and mature field declines negatively affected full-year performance. Production increases were driven by continuing production ramp-ups/start-ups in Angola, Congo, Egypt, Kazakhstan, Venezuela and the Gulf of Mexico Congo and Turkmenistan (up 62 KBOE/d), as well as continuing production ramp-up in Angola, Congo, Egypt, Pakistan and Venezuela. This increase was partially offset by mature field declines as well as planned and unplanned facility downtimethe positive price impact reported in the North Sea and hurricane-related impacts in the Gulf of Mexico (down 11 KBOE/d). Higher oil prices on a yearly average resulted in lower volume entitlements in Eni’sCompany’s PSAs and similar contractual schemes down approximately 37 KBOE/d. When excluding the impact of lower entitlements in PSAs, production was up 5.6%(up 35 KBBL/d). The share of oil and natural gas produced outside Italy was 89% (88% in90% (89% for the full year 2007)ended December 31, 2008).

Production of liquidsLiquids production amounted to 1,0261,007 KBBL/d for the year ended December 31, 2009 which was down 1.9% from 2008 due to OPEC cuts. Excluding OPEC cuts, the unplanned facility downtime in Libya and was up 0.6% from a year ago. The most significantmature field declines, mainly in Italy and the North Sea were offset by production increases were registeredachieved in: (i) the Gulf of Mexico, Congo and Turkmenistan due to the contribution of acquired assets; (ii) Angola due to the start-up of the Mondo and Saxi/Batuque fields in the development area of former Block 15Tombua-Landana project (Eni’s interest 20%) and improved performance in Block 0 (Eni’s interest 9.8%); (ii) Congo due to the ramp-up of the Awa Paloukou project (Eni’s interest 90%); (iii) Kazakhstan due to a better performance; (iv) the Gulf of Mexico due to the start-up of the Thunderhawk (Eni’s interest 25%), Pegasus (Eni’s interest 58%) and (iii)Longhorn (Eni’s interest 75%) projects; and (v) Venezuela due to the start-upramp-up of the Corocoro field (Eni’s interest 26%).

Natural gas production (4,074 mmCF/d for the year ended December 31, 2009) declined from 2008 (down 1.7%). Production decreases were reporteddecreased in the North Sea and ItalyLibya due to plannedlower gas demand on the European market and unplanned facility downtimethe mentioned technical reasons, and for mature field declines. In addition, lower volume entitlements associated with higher average yearly oil pricesdeclines, mainly in Italy. Main increases were reported in the Company’s PSAs.

Production of natural gas for the full year was 4,143 mmCF/d and increased by 324 mmCF/d, or 8.5%, from a year ago. The improvement was driven by growthregistered in the Gulf of Mexico, Congo due to the contribution of acquired assets,M’Boundi gas project (Eni’s interest 83%), and PakistanCroatia due to production ramp-upthe start-up of the ZamzamaAnnamaria field (Eni’s interest 17.25%50%) and start-up of the Badhra field (Eni operator with a 40% interest). Production decreased in Italy and the United Kingdom due to mature field declines.

Oil and gas production sold in 2008 amounted to 632 mmBOE.622.8 mmBOE for the year ended December 31, 2009. The 22.9 mmBOE difference over production (645.7 mmBOE for the year ended December 31, 2009) reflected volumes of natural gas consumed in operations (19.1 mmBOE). Approximately 53%60% of liquids production sold (370.2(365.2 mmBBL) was destined to Eni’s Refining & Marketing division;division (of which 17% was processed in Eni’s refinery); about 32%30% of natural gas production sold (1,503(1,479 BCF) was destined to Eni’s Gas & Power division.

2630


The tables below set forthprovide Eni’s production, by final product sold of liquids and natural gas on an available-for-sale basisby geographical area for each of the periods indicated.last three fiscal years.

LIQUIDS PRODUCTION(1)

(KBBL/d)

 

Year ended December 31,Italy

Rest
of Europe

North Africa

West Africa

Kazakhstan

Rest of Asia

Americas

Australia and Oceania

Total

  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
(KBBL/d)
Liquids production (1) (2)      
Italy 79 75 68
North Africa 329 337 338
West Africa 322 280 289
North Sea 178 157 140
Caspian Area 64 70 81
Rest of the World 107 101 110
Total 1,079 1,020 1,026
  
 
 






2007 75 157 337 280 70 37 53 11 1,020
2008 68 140 338 289 69 49 63 10 1,026
2009 56 133 292 312 70 57 79 8 1,007
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

(1)iData includes Eni’s share of production of affiliates and joint ventureventures accounted for under the equity method of accounting amounting to 5, 717, 14 and 812 KBBL/d in 2009, 2008 2007 and 2006,2007, respectively.

NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION AVAILABLE FOR SALE(1) (2)

(mmCF/d)

 

Year ended December 31,Italy

Rest
of Europe

North Africa

West Africa

Kazakhstan

Rest of Asia

Americas

Australia and Oceania

Total

  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
(mmCF/d)
Natural gas production available for sale (1) (2)      
Italy 883 763 725
North Africa 1,187 1,357 1,661
West Africa 232 220 204
North Sea 557 557 521
Caspian Area 214 222 227
Rest of the World 606 700 805
Total 3,679 3,819 4,143
  
 
 






2007 763 607 1,357 220 222 380 232 38 3,819
2008 725 588 1,661 204 227 396 304 38 4,143
2009 630 608 1,503 213 241 417 416 46 4,074
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

(1)i

Data includes Eni’s share of production of affiliates and joint ventureventures accounted for under the equity method of accounting amounting to 13,29, 26 and 28 and 31 mmCF/d in 2009, 2008 and 2007, and 2006, respectively.

(2)i

It excludes production volumes of natural gas consumed in operations. Said volumes were 300, 281 296 and 286296 mmCF/d in 2009, 2008 and 2007, and 2006, respectively.

Volumes of oil and natural gas purchased under long-term supply contracts with foreign governments or similar entities in properties where Eni acts as producer totaled 97 KBOE/d, 93 KBOE/d and 75 KBOE/d in 2009, 2008 and 57 KBOE/d2007, respectively.

The tables below provide Eni’s average sales prices per unit of liquids and natural gas by geographical area for each of the last three fiscal years. Also Eni’s average production cost per unit of production is disclosed. The average production cost does not include any ad valorem or severance taxes.

AVERAGE SALES PRICES AND PRODUCTION COST PER UNIT

($)

Italy

Rest
of Europe

North Africa

West Africa

Kazakhstan

Rest of Asia

Americas

Australia and Oceania

Total










2007                  
Oil and condensate, per BBL 62.47 70.84 67.86 69.77 59.34 64.73 66.37 71.23 67.70
Natural gas, per KCF 8.58 6.71 4.60 1.21 0.41 4.34 6.69 5.94 5.42
Average production cost, per BOE 7.89 8.35 4.22 11.53 4.90 3.13 7.17 10.35 6.90
2008                  
Oil and condensate, per BBL 84.87 71.90 84.71 91.58 79.06 75.08 88.69 82.80 84.05
Natural gas, per KCF 13.06 10.55 7.14 1.50 0.53 5.50 8.81 9.59 8.01
Average production cost, per BOE 9.40 8.67 3.66 15.25 5.86 3.69 10.27 8.50 7.77
2009                  
Oil and condensate, per BBL 56.02 56.46 55.97 59.75 52.34 55.23 55.74 50.40 56.95
Natural gas, per KCF 9.01 7.06 5.78 1.66 0.45 4.30 4.05 8.14 5.62
Average production cost, per BOE 9.69 8.28 4.05 13.15 5.20 3.49 8.25 9.56 7.49









Drilling and other exploratory and development activities

In 2009, a total of 69 new exploratory wells7 were drilled (37.6 of which represented Eni’s share), as compared to 111 exploratory wells drilled in 2008 (58.4 of which represented Eni’s share) and 81 exploratory wells drilled in 2007 (43.5 of which represented Eni’s share).

Overall commercial success rate was 41.9% (43.6% net to Eni) as compared to 36.5% (43.4% net to Eni) and 2006,40% (38% net to Eni) in 2008 and 2007, respectively.


(7)Including drilled exploratory wells that have been suspended pending further evaluation.

31


In 2009, a total of 418 development wells were drilled (175.1 of which represented Eni’s share) as compared to 366 development wells drilled in 2008 (155.1 of which represented Eni’s share) and 349 development wells drilled in 2007 (156.7 of which represented Eni’s share).

The table below provides the number of net productive and dry exploratory and development oil and natural gas wells completed in the years indicated by the Group companies and its equity-accounted entities.

NET EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT DRILLING ACTIVITY

(units)

Italy

Rest
of Europe

North Africa

West Africa

Kazakhstan

Rest of Asia

Americas

Australia and Oceania

Total










2007
Exploratory
 4.0 1.4 15.3 1.7 0.2 0.2 9.6 0.6 33.0
Productive 0.5   7.7 0.5   0.2 3.6   12.5
Dry (a) 3.5 1.4 7.6 1.2 0.2   6.0 0.6 20.5
Development 17.0 27.3 45.8 18.5 1.3 37.8 8.4 0.6 156.7
Productive 17.0 27.2 45.8 18.5 1.3 34.1 5.9 0.6 150.4
Dry (a)   0.1       3.7 2.5   6.3
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2008
Exploratory
 0.7 3.7 22.9 7.4   16.2 3.4 1.4 55.7
Productive   0.7 8.7 4.0   9.4 1.4   24.2
Dry (a) 0.7 3.0 14.2 3.4   6.8 2.0 1.4 31.5
Development 12.9 5.5 47.6 37.2 2.6 43.0 6.3   155.1
Productive 11.3 5.5 46.4 36.4 2.6 36.5 6.3   145.0
Dry (a) 1.6   1.2 0.8   6.5     10.1
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2009
Exploratory
 1.0 4.3 8.6 2.7   6.2 4.8 2.2 29.8
Productive   4.1 4.8     2.3 1.0 0.8 13.0
Dry (a) 1.0 0.2 3.8 2.7   3.9 3.8 1.4 16.8
Development 18.3 12.5 41.1 37.7 3.8 42.9 16.6 2.2 175.1
Productive 18.3 12.5 40.7 35.8 3.8 38.6 15.6 2.2 167.5
Dry (a)     0.4 1.9   4.3 1.0   7.6
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

(a)A dry well is an exploratory, development, or extension well that proves to be incapable of producing either oil or gas sufficient quantities to justify completion as an oil or gas well.

Present activities

The table below provides the number of exploratory and development oil and natural gas wells in the process of being drilled by the Group companies and its equity-accounted entities as of December 31, 2009. A gross well is a well in which Eni owns a working interest.

DRILLING ACTIVITY IN PROGRESS

(units)

Italy

Rest
of Europe

North Africa

West Africa

Kazakhstan

Rest of Asia

Americas

Australia and Oceania

Total










As of December 31, 2009 Exploratory (a)                  
Gross 6.0 25.0 26.0 60.0 13.0 19.0 22.0 1.0 172.0
Net 4.4 6.6 18.6 15.4 2.3 8.8 8.4 1.0 65.5
Development                  
Gross 6.0 8.0 16.0 23.0 2.0 13.0 47.0 1.0 116.0
Net 5.8 1.2 6.9 8.2 0.7 6.2 12.1 0.1 41.2
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

(a)Includes temporary suspended wells pending further evaluation.

27Oil and gas properties, operations and acreage

As of December 31, 2009, Eni’s mineral right portfolio consisted of 1,246 exclusive or shared rights for exploration and development in 40 countries on five continents for a total acreage of 347,862 square kilometers of which 41,794 square kilometers was developed acreage and 306,068 square kilometers was undeveloped acreage.

32


In 2009, total net acreage increased mainly due to: (i) the acquisition of a 27.5% interest in the Alliance area, in Northern Texas from Quicksilver Resources Inc and of a 37.8% interest in the Sanga Sanga license in Indonesia, both in the development of non-conventional gas resources; (ii) the awarding of the giant Zubair oil field (Eni’s interest 32.8%); and (iii) new leases in Angola, China, Ghana, the Gulf of Mexico, India, Norway and Yemen for a total acreage of approximately 40,000 square kilometers net to Eni.

Main decreases were in Mali due to the release of exploration licenses covering an undeveloped acreage of 100,000 square kilometers. Other exploration licenses were released in Congo, Egypt, Italy, Morocco, Norway, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States mainly related to undeveloped areas.

The table below provides certain information about the Company’s oil and gas properties. It discloses the total gross and net developed and undeveloped oil and natural gas acreage in which the Group and its equity-accounted entities had interest as of December 31, 2009. A gross acreage is one in which Eni owns a working interest.

December 31, 2008

December 31, 2009



Total net acreage (a)

Number
of interests

Gross developed (b) acreage (a)

Gross undeveloped acreage (a)

Total gross acreage (a)

Net developed (b) acreage (a)

Net undevelopedacreage (a)

Total net acreage (a)









EUROPE 30,511 315 17,918 33,643 51,561 11,794 19,813 31,607
Italy 20,409 167 11,641 15,537 27,178 9,692 12,346 22,038
Rest of Europe 10,102 148 6,277 18,106 24,383 2,102 7,467 9,569
Croatia 988 2 1,975   1,975 987   987
Norway 3,861 51 2,277 8,907 11,184 338 3,074 3,412
United Kingdom 1,450 89 2,025 3,140 5,165 777 692 1,469
Other countries 3,803 6   6,059 6,059   3,701 3,701
AFRICA 249,672 276 70,121 230,549 300,670 19,865 138,884 158,749
North Africa 31,088 119 30,820 54,725 85,545 13,431 32,580 46,011
Algeria 909 38 2,152 17,458 19,610 727 16,517 17,244
Egypt 9,741 57 4,445 18,652 23,097 1,571 6,757 8,328
Libya 18,164 13 17,947 18,427 36,374 8,951 9,214 18,165
Tunisia 2,274 11 6,276 188 6,464 2,182 92 2,274
West Africa 156,557 151 39,301 98,600 137,901 6,434 54,090 60,524
Angola 3,323 67 4,532 16,317 20,849 590 2,803 3,393
Congo 8,244 25 1,865 13,724 15,589 991 7,197 8,188
Gabon 7,615 6   7,615 7,615   7,615 7,615
Ghana   2   2,300 2,300   1,086 1,086
Mali 128,801 1   47,500 47,500   31,668 31,668
Nigeria 8,574 50 32,904 11,144 44,048 4,853 3,721 8,574
Other countries 62,027 6   77,224 77,224   52,214 52,214
ASIA 93,710 80 18,924 204,274 223,198 6,369 119,272 125,641
Kazakhstan 880 6 324 4,609 4,933 105 775 880
Rest of Asia 92,830 74 18,600 199,665 218,265 6,264 118,497 124,761
China 192 7 237 18,461 18,698 39 18,283 18,322
East Timor 9,779 5   9,999 9,999   7,999 7,999
India 9,091 14 303 27,861 28,164 143 9,946 10,089
Indonesia 17,316 12 1,735 25,940 27,675 656 15,863 16,519
Iraq   1 1,950   1,950 640   640
Iran 820 4 1,456   1,456 820   820
Pakistan 18,855 21 9,122 24,782 33,904 2,708 15,493 18,201
Russia 3,891 5 3,597 3,039 6,636 1,058 1,265 2,323
Saudi Arabia 25,844 1   51,687 51,687   25,844 25,844
Turkmenistan 200 1 200   200 200   200
Yemen 3,598 2   23,296 23,296   20,560 20,560
Other countries 3,244 1   14,600 14,600   3,244 3,244
AMERICAS 12,043 558 4,737 17,234 21,971 3,090 8,433 11,523
Brazil 1,389 2   1,389 1,389   1,067 1,067
Ecuador 2,000 1 2,000   2,000 2,000   2,000
Trinidad & Tobago 66 1 382   382 66   66
United States 6,648 543 1,977 9,120 11,097 926 5,524 6,450
Venezuela 614 3 378 1,178 1,556 98 516 614
Other countries 1,326 8   5,547 5,547   1,326 1,326
AUSTRALIA AND OCEANIA 29,558 17 1,057 48,216 49,273 676 19,666 20,342
Australia 29,520 16 1,057 47,452 48,509 676 19,628 20,304
Other countries 38 1   764 764   38 38
Total 415,494 1,246 112,757 533,916 646,673 41,794 306,068 347,862
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

(a)Square kilometers.
(b)Developed acreage refers to those leases in which at least a portion of the area is in production or encompasses proved developed reserves.

33


The table below sets forth certain informationprovides the number of gross and operating data regarding Eni’s principalnet productive oil and natural gas wells in which the Group companies and its equity-accounted entities had interests as of December 31, 2008.

Principal2009. A gross well is a well in which Eni owns a working interest. The number of gross wells is the total number of wells in which Eni owns a whole or fractional working interest. The number of net wells is the sum of the whole or fractional working interests in a gross well. One or more completions in the same bore hole are counted as one well. Productive wells are producing wells and wells capable of production. The total number of oil and natural gas interests at December 31, 2008productive wells is 7,181 (2,417.2 of which represent Eni’s share).

  

Commencement
of operations

 

Number of interests

 

Gross exploration and development acreage (1)

 

Net exploration and development acreage (1)

 

Type of fields

 

Number of producing fields

 

Number of other fields


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Italy 

1926

 

159

 

25,522

 

20,409

 

Onshore/Offshore

 

87

 

99

Outside Italy   

1,085

 

732,976

 

395,085

 

Onshore/Offshore

 

419

 

219

North Africa              
Algeria 

1981

 

34

 

2,921

 

909

 

Onshore

 

28

 

12

Egypt 

1954

 

59

 

26,335

 

9,741

 

Onshore/Offshore

 

34

 

34

Libya 

1959

 

13

 

36,375

 

18,164

 

Onshore/Offshore

 

12

 

17

Mali 

2006

 

5

 

193,200

 

128,801

 

Onshore

    
Tunisia 

1961

 

11

 

6,464

 

2,274

 

Onshore/Offshore

 

21

 

4

    

122

 

265,295

 

159,889

   

95

 

67

West Africa              
Angola 

1980

 

55

 

20,492

 

3,323

 

Onshore/Offshore

 

45

 

27

Congo 

1968

 

26

 

15,655

 

8,244

 

Onshore/Offshore

 

20

 

8

Gabon 

2008

 

6

 

7,615

 

7,615

 

Onshore/Offshore

    
Nigeria 

1962

 

50

 

44,049

 

8,574

 

Onshore/Offshore

 

95

 

38

    

137

 

87,811

 

27,756

   

160

 

73

North Sea              
Norway 

1965

 

50

 

11,771

 

3,861

 

Offshore

 

13

 

8

United Kingdom 

1964

 

91

 

5,207

 

1,450

 

Offshore

 

35

 

14

    

141

 

16,978

 

5,311

   

48

 

22

Caspian Area              
Kazakhstan 

1995

 

6

 

4,933

 

880

 

Onshore/Offshore

 

1

 

5

Turkmenistan 

2008

 

1

 

200

 

200

 

Onshore

 

2

  
    

7

 

5,133

 

1,080

   

3

 

5

Rest of world              
Australia 

2001

 

18

 

60,486

 

29,520

 

Offshore

 

2

 

2

Brazil 

1999

 

2

 

1,389

 

1,389

 

Offshore

    
China 

1983

 

3

 

899

 

192

 

Offshore

 

10

 

3

Croatia 

1996

 

2

 

1,975

 

988

 

Offshore

 

6

 

5

East Timor 

2006

 

5

 

12,224

 

9,779

 

Offshore

    
Ecuador 

1988

 

1

 

2,000

 

2,000

 

Onshore

 

1

 

1

India 

2005

 

3

 

24,425

 

9,091

 

Onshore/Offshore

 

4

 

2

Indonesia 

2001

 

11

 

28,605

 

17,316

 

Onshore/Offshore

 

7

 

12

Iran 

1957

 

4

 

1,456

 

820

 

Onshore/Offshore

 

3

  
Pakistan 

2000

 

21

 

35,938

 

18,855

 

Onshore/Offshore

 

7

 

3

Russia 

2007

 

5

 

6,636

 

3,891

 

Onshore

   

9

Saudi Arabia 

2004

 

1

 

51,687

 

25,844

 

Onshore

    
Trinidad & Tobago 

1970

 

1

 

382

 

66

 

Offshore

 

3

 

4

United States 

1968

 

575

 

11,478

 

6,648

 

Onshore/Offshore

 

69

 

11

Venezuela 

1998

 

3

 

1,556

 

614

 

Offshore

 

1

  
Yemen 

2008

 

1

 

3,911

 

3,598

 

Onshore

    
    

656

 

245,047

 

130,611

   

113

 

52

Other countries   

9

 

6,311

 

1,363

 

Offshore

    
Other countries with only exploration activity   

13

 

106,401

 

69,075

 

Onshore/Offshore

    
Total   

1,244

 

758,498

 

415,494

   

506

 

318


 
 
 
 
 
 
 

PRODUCTIVE OIL AND GAS WELLS

(units)

Italy

Rest
of Europe

North Africa

West Africa

Kazakhstan

Rest of Asia

Americas

Australia and Oceania

Total










Number of productive wells as of Dec. 31, 2009 (a)
Oil wells
                  
Gross 185.0 384.0 1,103.0 2,764.0 85.0 355.0 125.0 4.0 5,005.0
Net 145.7 64.5 469.2 474.3 27.6 255.1 56.3 2.6 1,495.3
Gas wells                  
Gross 481.0 198.0 120.0 501.0   658.0 207.0 11.0 2,176.0
Net 421.1 75.2 49.1 36.6   264.3 72.6 3.0 921.9
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

(1)(a)iSquare kilometers.Includes approximately 2,144 gross (633 net) multiple completion wells (more than one producing into the same well bore).

Eni’s principal regions of operationsoil and gas properties are described below. In the discussion that follows, references to hydrocarbon production are to be intended to represent hydrocarbon production available for sale.

28


Italy

Eni has been operating in Italy since 1926. In 2007,2009, Eni’s oil and gas production amounted to 195165 KBOE/d. Eni’s activities in Italy are deployed in the Adriatic Sea, the Central Southern Apennines, mainland and offshore Sicily and the Po Valley. Eni’s exploration and development activities in Italy are regulated by concession contracts.

As part of the optimization process of Eni’s upstream portfolio, management approved a plan for rationalizing Eni’s mineral activities in Italy by establishing three new companies to which certain of the Company’s assets have been contributed. The selected assets have different geographical locations: a first group of assets that are located in Northern Italy (Pianura Padana and Emilia Romagna) have been contributed to Società Padana Energia SpA; a second group with assets located in central Italy (Marche, Abruzzo, Molise) to Società Adriatica Idrocarburi SpA; lastly certain assets in southern Italy (Crotone area) have been contributed to Società Ionica Gas SpA. Negotiations are firmly underway for the sale of the two companies, Società Padana Energia SpA and Società Adriatica Idrocarburi SpA.

The Adriatic Sea represents Eni’s main production area in Italy, accounting for 48%46% of Eni’s domestic production in 2008.2009. Main operated fields are Barbara (124(98 mmCF/d net to Eni), Angela-Angelina (57(48 mmCF/d), Porto Garibaldi (49(39 mmCF/d), Cervia (39(46 mmCF/d) and Tea-Arnica-Lavanda (42(37 mmCF/d).

Eni is operator of the Val d’Agri concession (Eni’s interest 60.77%) in Basilicata Region, Southern Italy, resulting from the unitization of the Volturino and Grumento Nova concessions made in late 2005. Production from the Monte Alpi, Monte Enoc and Cerro Falcone fields is fed by 21 production wells of the 47 foreseen by the sanctioned development plan and is supported by the Viggiano oil center with a treatment capacity of 104 KBBL/d. Oil produced is carried to Eni’s refinery in Taranto via a 136-kilometer long pipeline. Gas produced is treated at the Viggiano oil center. In 2008, the Val d’Agri concession produced 95 KBOE/d (58 net to Eni) corresponding to 29%

34


Eni is the operator of the Val d’Agri concession (Eni’s interest 60.77%) in the Basilicata Region in southern Italy. Production from the Monte Alpi, Monte Enoc and Cerro Falcone fields is fed by 24 production wells of the 47 foreseen by the sanctioned development plan and is supported by the Viggiano oil center with a treatment capacity of 104 KBBL/d. Oil produced is carried to Eni’s refinery in Taranto via a 136-kilometer long pipeline. Gas produced is treated at the Viggiano oil center and then delivered to the national grid system. In 2009, the Val d’Agri concession produced 78 KBOE/d (42 net to Eni) representing 25% of Eni’s production in Italy.

Eni is the operator of 15 production concessions onshore and offshore in Sicily. Its main fields are Gela, Ragusa, Giaurone, Fiumetto and Prezioso, which in 2009 accounted for 10% of Eni’s production in Italy.

Eni is operator
Full year development activities mainly related to: (i) the completion of 15the first development phase in the Val d’Agri concession through the connection to the oil treatment plant of the first wells located in the Cerro Falcone, with a production concessions onshoreof 6 KBOE/d; (ii) the start-up of LPT Tresauro oil field in Sicily and offshore Sicily. Its main fields are Gela, Ragusa, Giaurone, Fiumettothe installation of a production platform on Annamaria B where production started in March 2010; and Prezioso, which in 2008 accounted for 9% of Eni’s(iii) production in Italy.

Developmentoptimization activities concerned in particular: (i) optimization ofon producing fields by means of

sidetrack, work over and rigless activities (Annalisa, Antares, Barbara, Cervia, Giovanna, Gela, Luna and Trecate fields).

Offshore activities in Sicily related to the development of three recent gas discoveries (Panda, Argo and Cassiopea). Start-up is expected in 2013.

29


sidetracking and infilling (Antares, Cervia, Emma, Fratello North, Giovanna, Hera-Lacinia, Gela, Luna and Fiumetto); (ii) continuation of drilling and upgrading of producing facilities in the Val d’Agri; and (iii) completion of development activities at Cascina Cardana field and phase 1 of the Val d’Agri project.

Other development activities were the development of the Annamaria and the Guendalina gas fields in the Adriatic Sea. The Annamaria project provides for the installation of a production platform and the linkage by sealines to the Fano plant. Start-up is expected in 2009. Actions on Guendalina include the installation of a platform and the linkage by existing facilities to the Ravenna plant. Start-up is expected in 2010.

In December 2008 Eni was awarded two onshore exploration blocks in Puglia region.

Major discoveries were made in offshore Sicily with the operated gas discovery Cassiopea that has yielded excellent results in addition to the positive appraisal of the Argo gas field. Eni holds a 60% interest in the two discoveries. In particular for Cassiopea an accelerated development plan is foreseen in order to provide optimal synergies with the nearby Panda and Argo discoveries. The project provides for the drilling of undersea producing wells and the installation of a production platform linked to the existing onshore treatment facilities. Production start up is expected in 2011.

In the medium-term, management expects production in Italy to remain stable at the current level due to the production ramp-up of the Val d’Agri fields and ongoing new field projectprojects and continuing developmentproduction optimization activities designed to counteract mature field decline.

Rest of Europe

Eni’s operations in the Rest of Europe are conducted mainly in Croatia, Norway and the United Kingdom. In 2009, the Rest of Europe accounted for 14% of Eni’s total worldwide production of oil and natural gas.

Croatia. Eni has been present in Croatia since 1996. In 2009, Eni’s production of natural gas averaged 92 mmCF/d. Activities are deployed in the Adriatic Sea near the city of Pula.

Exploration and production activities in Croatia are regulated by PSAs.

The main producing gas fields are Ivana, Ika & Ida, Marica and Katarina operated by Eni through a 50/50 joint operating company with the Croatian oil company INA.

The fields start-up in 2009 are: (i) Annamaria (Eni’s interest 50%), with a production of approximately 13 mmCF/d net to Eni; and (ii) Irina (Eni’s interest 50%) and Vesna (Eni’s interest 50%), with an overall production at approximately 3 mmCF/d net to Eni.

35


Exploration activities yielded positive results with the Ika SW 2 appraisal well, which confirmed the mineral potential of the area.

Norway. Eni has been operating in Norway since 1964. Eni’s activities are performed in the Norwegian Sea, in the Norwegian section of the North Sea and in the Barents Sea. Eni’s production in Norway amounted to 123 KBOE/d in 2009.

Exploration and production activities in Norway are regulated by Production Licenses (PL). According to a PL, the holder is entitled to perform seismic surveys and drilling and production activities for a few years with possible extensions.

In May 2009 following an international bid procedure Eni was awarded the operatorship of exploration licenses PL 533 (Eni’s interest 40%) and PL 529 (Eni’s interest 40%) in addition to a 30% stake in PL 532 in the Barents Sea.

Eni holds interests in 6 production areas in the Norwegian Sea. The principal producing fields are Aasgard (Eni’s interest 14.82%), Kristin (Eni’s interest 8.25%), Heidrun (Eni’s interest 5.12%), Mikkel (Eni’s interest 14.9%) and Norne (Eni’s interest 6.9%), which in 2009 accounted for 65% of Eni’s production in Norway. Full year production start-up was achieved in: (i) the Yttergryta (Eni’s interest 9.8%) field, with a production of approximately 71 mmCF/d; and (ii) the Tyrihans (Eni’s interest 6.23%) field, with a production of approximately 3 KBBL/d. Development activities progressed in recent oil and gas discoveries near the Aasgard field (Eni’s interest 14.82%). In particular the development plan of the Morvin discovery (Eni’s interest 30%) provides linkage to existing production facilities that will be upgraded. Production start-up is expected in 2010 with peak production at 12 KBOE/d net to Eni in 2014.

Eni holds interests in four production licenses in the Norwegian section of the North Sea. The main producing field is Ekofisk (Eni’s interest 12.39%) in PL 018, which in 2009 produced approximately 56 KBOE/d net to Eni and accounted for 44% of Eni’s production in Norway. The license expires in 2028, and extension negotiations are ongoing. Ongoing projects aim at maintaining and optimizing production at Ekofisk by means of infilling wells, the development of the South Area, upgrading of existing facilities and optimization of water injection.

Currently Eni is only performing exploration activities in Barents Sea. Operations in this area are focused on the appraisal of the mineral potential of the large Goliat discovery made in 2000 at a water depth of 370 meters in PL 229 (Eni operator with a 65% interest) aimed at its commercial development. The license expires in 2042. The project is progressing according to schedule. Commencement is expected in 2013 with a production plateau at 100 KBBL/d. In 2009, the final investment decision of the Goliat project was sanctioned.

Exploration activities yielded positive results in the Prospecting License 128 (Eni’s interest 11.5%) with the Dompap gas discovery. Appraisal activities are underway.

United Kingdom. Eni has been present in the United Kingdom since 1964. Eni’s activities are carried out in the British section of the North Sea, in the Irish Sea and in some areas East and West of the Shetland Islands. In 2009 Eni’s net production of oil and gas averaged 100 KBOE/d.

Exploration and production activities in the United Kingdom are regulated by concession contracts.

Eni holds interests in 12 production areas in the British section of the North Sea. The main fields are Elgin/Franklin (Eni’s interest 21.87%), the J-Block (Eni’s interest 33%), Andrew (Eni’s interest 16.21%), Farragon (Eni’s interest 30%), the Flotta Catchment Area (Eni’s interest 20%), Mac-Culloch (Eni’s interest 40%) and West

36


Franklin (Eni’s interest 21.87%), which in 2009 accounted for 61% of Eni’s production in the United Kingdom. Development activities consist of infilling actions at the Elgin/Franklin, Mac-Culloch (Eni’s interest 40%) and Jade (Eni’s interest 7%) fields to maintain production levels. Pre-development activities are underway at the following discoveries: (i) the Burghley field (Eni’s interest 21.92%) with expected start-up in 2010; (ii) the Kinnoul oil and gas field (Eni’s interest 16.67%) to be developed in synergy with the production facilities of the Andrew field (Eni’s interest 16.21%) and expected start-up in 2012; (iii) the Jasmine gas field (Eni’s interest 33%) with expected start-up in 2012; and (iv) the Mariner field (Eni’s interest 8.89%) with expected start-up in 2015.

Eni holds a 53.9% interest in 6 production fields in the Liverpool Bay area in the Eastern section of the Irish Sea. The main fields are Douglas, Hamilton and Lennox and their extension which in 2009 accounted for 21% of Eni’s production in UK. Upgrades to the facilities are underway.

Eni holds interest in 6 production permits located east of the Shetland Islands. The main fields are Ninian (Eni’s interest 12.94%) and Magnus (Eni’s interest 5%), which in 2009 accounted for 4% of Eni’s production in the United Kingdom. In 2009, maintenance and optimization actions were performed with the drilling of infilling wells.

Exploration activities yielded positive results in Block 22/25a (Eni’s interest 16.95%) with the Culzean gas discovery near the Elgin/Franklin producing field (Eni’s interest 21.87%). A study of the development activities is underway.

North Africa

Eni’s operations in North Africa are conducted in Algeria, Egypt, Libya and Tunisia. In 2008,2009, North Africa accounted for 36%32% of Eni’s total worldwide production of oil and natural gas.

Algeria. Eni has been present in Algeria since 1981. In 2008,2009, Eni’s oil and gas production averaged 80 KBOE/d. Operating activities are located in the Bir Rebaa area in the South-Eastern desert and include the following exploration and production blocks: (a)(i) Blocks 403 a/d (Eni’s interest 100%); (b)(ii) Blocks 401a/402a (Eni’s interest 55%); (c)(iii) Blocks 403 (Eni’s interest 50%) and 404a (Eni’s interest 12.25%); and (d)(iv) under development Blocks 212 (Eni’s interest 22.38%) and, 208 (Eni’s interest 12.25%). and 405b (Eni’s interest 75%), the latter purchased in 2008 from Canadian company First Calgary.

37


In November 2008, Eni completedRelevant authorities confirmed the acquisition of First Calgary Petroleums Ltd, a Canadian oil and gas company with exploration and development activities in Algeria. The acquisition values the fully diluted share capital of First Calgary at approximately CAN $923 million (equal to euro 605 million). Assets acquired include the operatorship of Block 405b with a 75% interest. Production start-up is expected in 2011 with a projected production plateau of approximately 30 KBOE/d net to Eni by 2012.

In December 2008, following an international bid procedure, Eni was awarded the operatorship of the Kerzaz exploration block (Block 319a-321a)area (Blocks 319a, 321a and 316b) covering a grosstotal acreage of 16,000 square kilometers. Exploration activity start-up is expected in 2009.

activities are underway.

Exploration and production activities in Algeria are regulated by Production Sharing Agreements (PSAs) and concession contracts.

Production in Block 403a/d is supplied mainly by the HBN and Rom and satellite fields and accounted forwhich represented approximately 12%28% of Eni’s production in Algeria in 2008.2009. The main project underway is the Rom Integrated project, designed to develop the Rom and satellites reserves of(Zea, Zek and Rec) following the mineral potential revaluation. Current production is collected at the Rom Main, ZEACentral Production Facility (CPF) and Rom North fields. The development project provides construction ofdelivered to the treatment plant in Bir Rebaa North. Drilling and work over activities were started in 2009. An export pipeline and a new oil treatment plantmultiphase pumping system are underway in compliance with a capacityapplicable Country law to reduce gas flaring.

Production in Blocks 401a/402a is supplied mainly by the Rod and satellite fields and accounted for approximately 22% of 32 KBBL/d withEni’s production start-up expected in 2012. In 2008 EniAlgeria in 2009. Infilling activities are being performed in order to maintain the current production plateau.

The main fields in Block 403 are BRN, BRW and Sonatrach signed a framework agreement to set out the common contractual groundBRSW which accounted for approximately 16% of the project and to extend the duration of the

30


Rhourde Messaoud and Zemlet Adreg development licenses for further 10 years and the Bir Rebaa North license for further 5 years.

Production in Blocks 401a/402a is supplied mainly by the Rod and satellite fields and accounted for approximately 23% of Eni’s production in Algeria in 2008. Infilling activities are being performed in order to maintain the current production plateau.

The main fields in Block 403 are BRN, BRW and BRSW and accounted for approximately 14% of Eni’s production in Algeria in 2008.Eni’s production in Algeria in 2009. Exploration activities for appraising the mineral potential of the area are planned.

In Block 405b, the development activity relates to the MLE and CAFC integrated project. During 2009 the MLE final investment decision was sanctioned. This project provides the construction of a NGL plant with a capacity of 350 mmCF/d. Production start-up is expected in November 2011. The CAFC final investment decision will be sanctioned in 2010. The CAFC project will provide the construction of an oil treatement plant with a capacity of 35 KBBL/d and installation of water/gas injection systems. The development of the two fields will ensure a production plateau of approximately 33 KBOE/d net to Eni by 2012. Drilling activities are underway. In 2009 the EPC contract for the construction of a gas treatment plant, gathering and exporting facilities has been awarded. As of December 31, 2009, 11% of the project was completed. The PSA expires in 2037.

Block 208 is located south of Bir Rebaa. TheIn 2009, the final investment decision of El Merk Synergy, designed to jointly developwas sanctioned. During the year all EPC contracts for the development of this blockfacilities were awarded and adjoining blocks operated by other companies, is the main project underway in Algeria. In 2008 following an international bid procedure, the seven EPC contractsdrilling activity started. 24% of the project have been awarded. The project provides for the construction of a new treatment plant with a capacity of 11 KBOE/d net to Eniwas completed and production facilities in Block 404/208. Start-upstart-up is expected in the first quarter of 2012.

Main discoveries for the year were achieved in: (a) the Block 401a/402a with the ROD-21 appraisal well that started production through existing facilities; (b) the Block 404a with the BKNE-24 and HBNSE-12 appraisal wells, with the latter starting production through existing facilities.

The new Algerian hydrocarbon law No. 05 of 2007 introduced a higher tax burden for the national oil company Sonatrach that requested to renegotiate the economic terms of certain PSAs in order to restore the initial economic equilibrium. Eni signed an agreement for Block 403 while negotiations are ongoing for Block 401a/402a (Eni’s interest 55%) and Block 208 (Eni’s interest 12.25%). At present, management is not able to foresee the final outcome of such renegotiations.

In the medium-term, management expects to increase Eni’s production in Algeria to approximately 110greater than 125 KBOE/d, reflecting the development and integration of the First Calgary acquired assets.

Egypt. Eni has been present in Egypt since 1954. In 2008,2009, Eni’s share of production in this country amounting to 232220 KBOE/d and accounted for 13% of Eni’s total annual hydrocarbon production. Eni’s main producing liquid fields are located in the Belayim concession (Eni’s interest 100%), in the Western Desert mainly Melehia concession (56% interest) and offshore the Gulf of Suez.Ras Qattara (75% interest). Gas production mainly comes from the operated or participated concession of North Port Said (former Port Fouad, Eni’s interest 100%), Baltim (50% interest), Ras el Barr (50% interest, non-operated) and el Temsah (50% interest) offshore the Nile Delta. In 20082009, production from these concessions also includingincludes a portion of liquids accountedaccounting for 90%more than 80% of Eni’s production in Egypt.

38


Exploration and production activities in Egypt are regulated by concession contracts and PSAs.

In May 2009, Eni signed ana cooperation agreement with the Egypt’s Ministry of Petroleumfor Oil to broadenincrease and enhance an integrated model ofwiden cooperation aimed at developing hydrocarbon reserves in the Country and to implement a joint education project for the training of Egyptian professionals.development activities. The agreement include theprovides for: (i) an extension of the licence forconcession of the giant Belayim field in the Gulf of Suez until 2030, with Eni’s commitment to spending $1.5 billion over the next five years related to development expenditures, upgrading actions and theoperating costs; (ii) a joint study to evaluate a number of industrial initiatives to develop and marketmonetize the natural gas reserves at high depths.depth; and (iii) training and knowledge management.

In 2008 a number of fields started to produce: (i) the West Ashrafi (Eni’s interest 100%) field was completed underwater and linked to existing facilities; and (ii)2009, in the Ras el Barr concession (Eni’s interest 50%), the Taurt field was linked to the onshore West Harbour treatment plant. Production peaked at approximately 38 KBOE/d (13 net to Eni) in 2008. In the el Temsah concession (Eni operator with a 50% interest), development activities progressed at the Denise field started-up in late 2007. The production build-up was reached in 2008 through the completion of phase A of the development plan. Current production amounts to 37 KBOE/d (11 net to Eni). The Taurt and Denise fields are expected to ensure natural gas supplies of 23 KBOE/d to the first train of the Damietta LNG plant.

In the Gulf of Suez optimization activities progressed at the Belayim field (Eni’s interest 100%) by finalizing

31


basic engineering for the upgrading of the water injection system intended to recover residual reserves.

Development activities are underway offshore the Nile Delta: (i) in the Thekah concession (Eni operator with a 50% interest); and (ii) the North Bardawil concession (Eni operator with a 60% interest). Upgrading of the el Gamil compression plant progressed by adding new capacity.

Through its affiliate Unión Fenosa Gas, Eni has an indirect interest in the Damietta natural gas liquefaction plant with a producing capacity of 5.1 mmtonnes/y of LNG corresponding to approximately 268 BCF/y of feed gas. Eni is currently supplying 53 BCF/y to the first unit for a twenty-year period. Eni and the partners of the Damietta LNG plant have planned to double the capacity of this facility through the construction of a second train with a treatment capacity of approximately 268 BCF/y of gas. Eni will provide 88 BCF/y to the second train for a period of twenty years. The project is awaiting to be sanctioned by the Egyptian authorities. The reserves which are needed to feed the second train, have been already identified including the additional amounts that must be developed to meet the country’s domestic requirements under existing laws.

Main discoveries for the year were achieved in: (a) the offshore area of the Nile Delta, with the Satis-1 gas discovery (Eni’s interest 50%) and the appraisal activity of the Ha’py field; and (b) the onshore area with the Eky oil discoveryNorth Bardawil (Eni operator with a 100%60% interest) and Jasmine Est (Eni’s interest 56%).Thekah fields (Eni operator with a 50% interest) started-up by linking to El Gamil facilities with an overall production plateau at approximately 190 mmCF/d.

The basic engineering is ongoing at the Belayim field for the upgrading of water injection facilities to recover residual reserves.

Other development activities concerned the Tuna project, the second phase at the Denise field and upgrading of the el Gamil compression plant by adding new capacity to support production.

39


Through its affiliate Unión Fenosa Gas, Eni has an indirect interest in the Damietta natural gas liquefaction plant with a producing capacity of 5.1 mmtonnes/y of LNG corresponding to approximately 268 BCF/y of feed gas. Eni is currently supplying 35 BCF/y for a twenty-year period. Natural gas supplies derived from the Taurt and Denise fields with 17 KBOE/d net to Eni of feed gas.

In the medium-term, management expects production inthat Egypt to be one ofwill remain among Eni’s largest oil and gas producing countries.

Libya. Eni started operations in Libya in 1959. In 2009, Eni’s oil and gas production averaged 238 KBOE/d, the portion of liquids being 45%. Production activity is carried out in the Mediterranean Sea near Tripoli and in the Libyan Desert area.

Under the agreement signed in 2008 with the Libyan national oil company ("NOC"), Eni’s assets have been grouped into six contract areas. Onshore contract areas are: (i) Area A consisting in Libya in 1959. In 2008, Eni’s oil and gas production averaged 300 KBOE/d, the portion of liquids being 48%. Production activity is carried out in the Mediterranean offshore facing Tripoli and in the Libyan Desert area.

In June 2008, Eni and the Libyan national oil company NOC finalized six Exploration and Production Sharing contracts (EPSA) converting the original agreements that regulated Eni’s exploration and development activities in the country. The terms of Eni’s assets in Libya have been extended till 2042 and 2047 for oil and gas properties respectively. The two partners have also agreed to develop a number of industrial initiatives designed to monetize the large reserve base, particularly through the implementation of important gas projects. The economic effects and Eni’s production entitlements based on the new contracts have been determined effective from January 1, 2008.

Under above agreement the Eni’s assets have been grouped into six contract areas as follows: (i) area A including the former concession 82 (Eni’s interest 50%); (ii) Area B, former concessions 100 (Bu Attifel field) and the NC 125 Block (Eni’s interest 50%); (iii) Area E with El Feel (Elephant) field (Eni’s interest 33.3%); and (iv) Sicily Area F with Block 118 (Eni’s interest 50%). Offshore contract areas are: (i) Area C with the Bouri oil field (Eni’s interest 50%); and (ii) Area D with Blocks NC 41 and NC 169 (onshore) that feed the Western Libyan Gas Project (Eni’s interest 50%).

In the exploration phase, Eni is operator of four onshore blocks in the Muzurk basin (161/1, 161/2&4, 176/3), in the Kufra area (186/1, 2, 3 & 4) and in the contract Areas A, B and D.

Exploration and production activities in Libya are regulated by six Exploration and Production Sharing contracts (EPSA). The terms of Eni’s assets in Libya have been extended until 2042 and 2047 for oil and gas properties respectively, taking into account the extension clauses.

Main development activities underway include the Western Libyan Gas project (Eni’s interest 50%) for the exploitation of gas reserves ratified in the strategic agreements between Eni and NOC. In particular upgrading of plants and facilities in order to increase gas sales by 49 BCF/y was completed. Additional gas volumes are also expected to be on stream by 2015 from a portfolio of undeveloped fields. Gas production at Wafa and Bahr Essalam will be maintained by increasing compression capacity at Wafa field and drilling of additional wells in both fields.

In 2009, volumes delivered through the GreenStream pipeline were 309 BCF. In addition, 43 BCF were sold on the Libyan market for power generation and to fuel the GreenStream pipeline compression plant.

Other projects underway related to: (i) a plan to exploit flaring gas and associated condensates from the Bouri oil field (Eni’s interest 50%); that will be pre-treated in the area and then delivered at the Mellitah plant for the final treatment; and (ii) Area D with Blocks NC 41 and NC 169 (onshore) that feedongoing activities aimed at maintaining the Western Libyan Gas ProjectEl Feel field (Eni’s interest 50%33.3%). production plateau through water injection.

In the exploration phase, Eni is operatormedium-term, management expects to increase Eni’s production in Libya due to the expected ramp-up of four onshore blocksnew gas developments the schedule of which will depend upon future trends in the Muzurk basin (161/1, 161/2&4, 176/3) and ingas market with the Kufra area (186/1, 2, 3 & 4).

The tax burden on Eni’s taxable profit has been determined based on the renewed tax framework, enacted in 2007, applicable to foreign oil companies operating under PSA schemes. In line with past practice, NOC has retained the role of tax agent on behalf of foreign oil companies. This tax regime does not alter the agreed economic valuesupport of the EPSAs currently in place between Eni and NOC. Based on the arrangements agreed upon with NOC, the tax baseupgrade of the Company’s Libyan oil properties has been reassessed resultingGreenStream pipeline, despite mature field declines. In the medium-term Libya is expected to remain the largest producing country by volume in the partial utilization of previously accrued deferred tax liabilities amounting to euro 173 million.Eni’s portfolio.

3240


Within the Western Libyan Gas project upgrading of plants and facilities is underway aimed at increasing gas exports by 106 BCF/y fully operating from the 2014 and maintaining production profiles at the Wafa oil field. In 2008 exported volumes amounted to 332 BCF, equal to 90% of the total gas production of the two fields. In addition 35 BCF were sold on the Libyan market for power generation.

Other ongoing development activities concern the A-NC118 field (Eni’s interest 50%) linking it to the pipelines connecting Wafa with Mellitah plant and the valorization of associated gas of the Bouri field. The partially treated gas and associated condensates will be shipped by sealine to the nearby Sabratha platform and exported through the GreenStream pipeline.

Main discoveries for the year were achieved in: (a) the offshore Block NC41, where the U1-NC41 discovery well showed the presence of oil and natural gas and the D4-NC41 appraisal well showed the presence of natural gas and condensates; and (b) in former Concession 82, the YY-1 discovery well showed the presence of oil.

In the medium-term, management expects to increase Eni’s production in Libya owing to the expected ramp-up of new mineral structures near the Western Libyan Gas Project fields with the support of the upgrade of the GreenStream pipeline, despite mature field declines. Eni targets a production level in excess of 280 KBOE/d. If this target is achieved, in the medium-term Libya will become the largest producing country by volume in Eni’s portfolio.

Tunisia. Eni has been present in Tunisia since 1961. In 2008,2009, Eni’s production amounted to 15 KBOE/d. Eni’s activities are located mainly in the Southern desert areas and in the Mediterranean offshore facing Hammamet and in the Southern desert areas.Hammamet.

Exploration and production in this country are regulated by concessions.

Production mainly comes from the Adam (Eni operator with a 25% interest), Oued Zar (Eni operator with a 50% interest), MLD (Eni’s interest 50%) and El Borma (Eni’s interest 50%) onshore blocks.

The ongoing development activitiesprojects mainly regardedrelated to the optimization of production at the Adam, Djebel Grouz (Eni’s interest 50%), Oued Zar MLD and El Borma concessions.blocks.

Development activities started also at the production platformThe development plan of the Maamoura (Eni’s interest 49%) and Baraka (Eni’s interest 49%) fields. Production start-up is expected in 2009.

Main discoveries for the year were achieved in the following permits: (a) Adam, where the Mejda-1 and El Azzel North-1 wells showed the presence of oil; (b) Bekconcession (Eni operator with a 25%49% interest), where is almost completed with early production started-up in late 2009. The Baraka (Eni operator with a 49% interest) development project is in the Abir-1final stage with production peaking at 11 KBOE/d which is expected in 2010.

Exploration activities yielded positive results with four discovery wells among five drilled. In 2009 gas production was started in one well, found oil and natural gas; (c) MLD, where the LASSE-1 well found oil and natural gas; and (d) El Borma, where the EB-406 exploratory well showed additional oil resources.while two more wells are expected to start-up in 2010.

In the medium-term, Eni expects production in Tunisia to increase duethanks to the development of recent discoveries.

West Africa

Eni’s operations in West Africa are conducted mainly in Angola, Congo and Nigeria. In 2008,2009, West Africa accounted for 19%20% of Eni’s total worldwide production of oil and natural gas.

Angola.Eni has been present in Angola since 1980. In 2008,2009, Eni’s production averaged 121125 KBOE/d. Eni’s activities are concentrated in the conventional and deep offshore.

33


The main blocks with Eni’s participation are: (i) Block 0 in Cabinda (Eni’s interest 9.8%) west of the Angolan coast; (ii) Development Areas in the former Block 14 (Eni’s interest 20%) in the deep offshore west of Block 0; and (iii) Development Areas in the former Block 15 (Eni’s interest 20%) in the deep offshore of the Congo basin.

Eni also holds interests in other minor concessions, in particular in some areas of Block 3 (with interests varying from 12 to 15%) and in the Lianzi Development Area (former 14K/A IMI Unit Area-Eni’s interest 10%). In the exploration and development phase, Eni is operator of Block 15/06 (with a 35%(35% interest) and, holds interests12% interest in Block 3/05-A, with a 12% interest.10% interest in Cabinda North (onshore) and 20% interest in the Open Areas of the Gas Project.

Exploration and production activities in Angola are regulated by concessions and PSAs.

In May 2008, Eni acquired a 10% interest in the Cabinda North Block from the state oil company Sonangol.

In February 2009, Eni signed the first three agreements pertaining towere finalized as part of the Memorandum of Understanding signed in August 2008 with Angola’s state oil company Sonangol. These agreements provideNational Oil Company Sonangol, providing for: (i) a feasibility study that addressesto assess the economics of the utilization of associated gas in feeding a newgrass-root onshore power plant; (ii) a joint study that evaluates areas of the highly prospectiveto evaluate and collect data on certain Angolan onshore basins and their production potential for furtherin view of identifying upstream sector initiatives;opportunities; and (iii) the definitiondesign of a number of educational and training projects targeting Angolan professionals in the development of energy resources.

In 2009, production started-up at the Mafumeira field in Block 0 in the Cabinda A area (Eni’s interest 9.8%) and the training of Angolan professionals withLandana-Tombua fields in the aim of implementing energy initiatives.

41


Development at the Landana and Tombua oil fields in offshore Block 14 (Eni’s interest 20%) progressed. Early production is ongoing in the north area of Landana that was linked to the Benguela/Belize-Lobito/Tomboco facilities. Production is expected to peak at 100 KBBL/d in 2010 at the endAreas of the drilling program.

Activities at the Banzala oil field informer Block 0 in Cabinda (Eni’s interest 9.8%) progressed as planned. The commissioning of a third production platform was achieved early 2008.14. Peak production at 27 KBBL/33 KBOE/d (3 net to Eni)and 136 KBOE/d is expected in 2009. Mafumeira project in Block 0 also progressed according to schedule toward first production expected in 2009.2010 and 2011, respectively.

With respect toWithin the activities for reducing gas flaring, reduction, projects progressed at the Takula and Nemba fieldsfield in Block 0. The start-up of Takula projectStart-up is expected in 2009.2013 reducing flared gas by approximately 85%. In 2009, the development activity of Takula field was completed. Gas currently flared will beis re-injected in the field; condensates will be shipped via a new pipeline to the Malongo treatment plant, to be converted into LPG.nearing completion.

Main projects underway in the Development Areas of former Block 15 were as follows: (i) development activities started-up at the Nemba field are planned includingsatellites of Kizomba project-phase 1. The project provides for the drilling of 18 producing wells linked to the FPSO vessels existing in the area. Associated gas injection wellswill be initially re-injected in the reservoirs in the Kizomba area, and thereafter delivered to the installation of a new production platform.A-LNG liquefaction plant. Start-up is expected in 2011.

2012. Peak production at 100 KBOE/d (21 net to Eni) is expected in 2013. The second phase provides for production from nearby discoveries; and (ii) the Gas Gathering project, entailing the construction of a pipeline collecting all gas from the Kizomba, Mondo and Saxi/Batuque fields in Block 15 (Eni’s interest 20%) were started-up by means of a floating, production, storage and offloading (FPSO) vessel. Peak production at 100 KBBL/d (18 KBBL/d net to Eni) was achieved at both fields in 2008. The outlined projects and other ongoing development activities aim at maintaining current oil production plateau in the area.

In 2008 the final investment decision was achieved regarding the development of the Kizomba Satellites project-phase 1. The project plans to produce reservoir of the Clochas and Mavacola oil discoveries. Start-upareas, is underway. Completion is expected in 2012.2011.

Eni holds a 13.6% interest in the Angola LNG LimitedLtd (A-LNG) consortium responsible for the construction of an LNG plant in Soyo, 300 kilometers north of Luanda. It will behas been designed with a processing capacity of 1about 1.1 BCF/yd of natural gas and to produce 5.2 mmtonnes/y of LNG and related products.LNG. The project has been sanctioned by relevant Angolan authorities. It envisages the development of 10,594 BCF of associated gas reserves in 30 years. Gas volumes currently being produced from offshore production blocks are flared. In 2008 the final investment decision was reached to build a pipeline linking the fields located in Blocks 0 and 14 to LNG plant in order to monetize gas currently flared. Start-up is expected in the first quarter of 2012. The LNG will be delivered to the United States market at the re-gasification plant in Pascagoula currently under construction (Eni’s capacity 45%, amounting to approximately 205 BCF/y) in Louisiana. Start-up is expected in late 2011.

34


Main oil discoveries for the year were made in: (a) Block 15/06,In addition, Eni finalized another agreement with the Ngoma-1national Angolan company and Sangos-1 discoveries. Bothother partners to be part of a second gas consortium which will explore further potential gas discoveries were declared(Gas project) to support the feasibility of commercial interest; (b)a second LNG train. Eni is the technical advisor for this consortium, with a 20% interest.

Exploration activities yielded positive results in: (i) Block 0, with3 (Eni’s interest 12%), the KambalaPunja-4 appraisal well; (c)well showed the development areapresence of liquids and natural gas; (ii) the Development Areas of former Block 14 (Eni’s interest 20%) with the Lucapa-5Malange-2 appraisal well; and (d)well containing oil; (iii) the development areaDevelopment Areas of former Block 15 (Eni’s interest 20%) with the Mavacola-3Mondo-4 appraisal well.

Inwell containing oil; and (iv) Block 15/06 (Eni operator with a 35% interest) where the medium-term, management expects to increase Eni’sCabaça Norte, Nzanza and Cinguvu discoveries showed the presence of oil and yielded 6.5 KBBL/d, 1.5 KBBL/d and 6.4 KBBL/d in test production, to approximately 150 KBBL/d reflecting contributions from ongoing development projects, despite mature field declines.respectively.

In the medium-term, management expects to increase Eni’s production to approximately 180 KBBL/d reflecting contributions from ongoing development projects, despite mature field declines.

Congo. Eni has been present in Congo since 1968. In 20082009, production averaged 8599 KBOE/d net to Eni. Eni’s activities are concentrated in the conventional and deep offshore facing Pointe Noire and onshore.

Exploration and production activities in the Congo are regulated by Production Sharing Agreements.

Eni’s main operated oil producing interests in Congo are the Zatchi (Eni’s interest 65%) and Loango (Eni’s interest 50%) fields, Blocks Marine VI, Ikalou (Eni’s interest 100%), Djambala, Foukanda e Mwafi (Eni’s interest 65%), Marine VIIKitina (Eni’s interest 35.75%), Awa Paloukou (Eni’s interest 90%), M’Boundi (Eni’s interest 80.1% pursuant to the acquisition of Burren Energy)83%) and Kouakouala A (Eni’s interest 100% pursuant to the acquisition of Burren Energy).75%) fields.

Other relevant producing areas are a 35% interest in the Pointe Noire Grand Fonde and PexPEX permits. In the exploration phase, Eni also holds interests in three deep offshore blocks currently in the exploration phase: Mer Très Profonde Nord (Eni operator with a 40% interest), Mer Très Profonde Sud deep offshore block (Eni’s interest 30%), the Noumbi onshore permit (Eni’s interest 37%), the Marine XXII offshore permit (Eni operator with a 90%65% interest), and the Le Kouilou onshore permit (Eni operator with aan 85% interest pursuant to the acquisition of Burren Energy)interest).

In May 2008, Eni signed a cooperation agreement with the Republic of Congo with the aim to develop the country’s mineral and oil potential. The agreement provides for: (i) development and extraction of unconventional oil from the Tchikatanga and Tchikatanga-Makola oil sands deposits. The two deposits that cover an acreage of approximately 1,790 square kilometers are deemed to contain significant amounts of resources based on a recent survey.

 

Eni plans to monetizeExploration and production activities in Congo are regulated by Production Sharing Agreements.

42


In 2009, the heavy oil by applying its EST (Eni Slurry Technology) proprietary technology intended to fully convert the heavy oil into high quality light products. The project will also benefit from synergies resulting from the close proximitydevelopment plan of the operated M’Boundi oilfield; (ii) collaboration in the use of vegetable oils, aimed at covering domestic demand for food uses and using excess amounts for the production of bio-diesel with Eni’s proprietary technology Ultra-Bio-Diesel; and (iii) construction of a 450 MW electricity generation plant near the Djeno oil terminal, withAwa-Paloukou field was completed. Production start-up expected in late 2009. The power station (Eni’s share 20%) will be fired with the associated natural gas fromwas 12 KBBL/d.

Activities on the M’Boundi field and offshore discoveries in permit Marine XII (Eni operator with a 90% interest) contributing to the reduction of gas flaring. The final investment decision was reached in 2008. This project aims at qualifying as Clean Development Mechanism in implementing the Kyoto protocol and as a contribution to the sustainable development of the Country.

The Awa Paloukou (Eni’s interest 90%) and Ikalou-Ikalou Sud (Eni’s interest 100%) operated fields in the Marine X and Madingo permits were started up in 2008 with production peaking at 13 KBOE/d net to Eni in 2009.

Development activities of the M’Boundi field moved forward with the revision of the production schemes and layout to plan application of advanced recovery techniques and a design to monetize associated gas. The permit expires in 2027. In 2009, Eni signed a long term agreement to supply associated gas from the M’Boundi field to feed three facilities in the Pointe Noire area: (i) the Koilou potassium plant, owned by Canadian Company MAG Industries and under construction; (ii) the CED (Centrale Electrique du Djeno) existing power plant; and (iii) the new built CEC (Centrale Electrique du Congo - Eni’s interest 20%). The facilities will also receive gas in the future from the offshore discoveries of the Marine XII permit.

The development activities to build the CEC power plant moved forward in 2009 as scheduled in the Cooperation Agreement signed by Eni and the Republic of Congo in 2007, and the start-up of the first turbo-generator occurred by the end of March 2010.

Also the studies related to the possible exploitation of unconventional oil reserves from the Tchikatanga and Tchikatanga-Makola areas have progressed, according to the cooperation agreement signed in 2008, with the particular aim to identify area where it would be possible to withstand the stringent Eni’s environmental and sustainability requirements for development.

Exploration activities yielded positive results in: (i) the Marine XII permit with two discoveries wells which confirmed the mineral potential of the area. The related PSA was signed; and (ii) the Le Kouilou permit with the Zingali field, confirmed by subsequently long production test.

In the medium-term, management expects to increase Eni’s production in Congo due to the integration and development of recently acquired assets as well as projects underway, targeting a level in excess of 140 KBBL/150 KBOE/d by 2013.

Ghana. On September 28, 2009, Eni acquired the operatorship of the offshore exploration permits for Cape Three Point South and Cape Three Point (Eni’s interest 47.2%). Exploration activities yielded positive results in 2012.the latter with the Sankofa discovery containing oil and natural gas.

Nigeria. Eni has been present in Nigeria since 1962. In 2008,2009, Eni’s oil and gas production averaged 119124 KBOE/d located mainly in the onshore and offshore of the Niger Delta.

35


In the development/production phase Eni is operator of onshore Oil Mining Leases (OML) 60, 61, 62 and 63 (Eni’s interest 20%) and offshore OML 125 (Eni’s interest 85%), OMLs 120-121 (Eni’s interest 40%) and holds a 12.5% interest, holding interests in OML 118 (Eni’s interest 12.5%) as well as in OML 119 and 116 service contracts. ThroughService Contracts. As partners of SPDC JV, oilthe largest joint venture in the country, Eni also holds a 5% interest in 3130 onshore blocks and a 12.86% interest in 5 conventional offshore blocks.

In the exploration phase Eni is operator of offshore Oil prospectingProspecting Leases (OPL) 244 (Eni’s interest 60%), OML 134 (former OPL 211 - Eni’s interest 85%) and onshore OPL 282 (Eni’s interest 90%) and OPL 135 (Eni’s interest 48%). Eni also holds a 12.5% interest in OML 135 (former OPL 219).

In December 2008 Eni exercised its pre-emption rights on the remaining 49.81% interest in Blocks OML 125 and 134. On the same occasion Eni transferred a 15% stake to the Nigerian company OANDO. This transaction has been approved by relevant authorities.

Exploration and production activities in Nigeria are regulated mainly by Production Sharing Agreements and concession contracts as well as service contracts, in two blocks, where Eni acts as contractor for state owned companies.

In 2009, production from the Oyo offshore field in Blocks OMLsOML 120/121 (Eni’s interest 40%) has started with peak production of 25 KBBL/d.

In Blocks OML 60, 61, 62 and 63 (Eni operator with a 20% interest), within the activities aimed at guaranteeing production to feed gas to the Bonny liquefaction plant (Eni’s interest 10.4%), the development activities of gas reserves are underway: (i) the basic engineering work for increasingcontinued by upgrading treatment capacity at the Obiafu/Obrikom plant was completed. The project also provides foras well as the installation of a new treatment plant and transport facilities; and (ii)facilities for carrying 155 mmCF/d net to Eni of feed gas for 20 years. To the same end the development plan of the Tuomo gas field has been progressing. Production is expected to start by means ofprogressing along with its linkage to the Ogbainbiri treatment plant. These activities target to supply 311 mmCF/d of feed

An integrated oil and gas toproject is underway in the Bonny liquefaction plant (Eni’s interest 10.4%) for a period of 20 years.

In the OML 118, Bonga field produced about 19 KBOE/d net to Eni via a FPSO unit with a 225 KBBL/d treatment capacity.Gbaran-Ubie area. The associated gas is gathered into a platform in EA field and then delivered to the Bonny liquefaction plant.

In the OML 119, Okono/Okpoho production reached about 12 KBBL/d net to Eni via a FPSO unit with a 40 KBBL/d treatment capacity.

In the OMLs 120/121 blocks (Eni operator with a 40% interest), the development plan of the Oyo oil discovery was approved. The project provides for the installationconstruction of an FPSO unita Central Processing Facility (CPF) with treatment capacity of 40 kBBL/about 1 BCF/d of gas and storage capacity120 KBBL/d of 1 mmBBL. Production start-up is expected in 2009.

36


Throughliquids, the SPDC JV,drilling of producing wells and the Forcados/Yokri oil and gas field is under development as partconstruction of a pipeline to carry the integrated associated gas gathering project aimed at supplying gas to the Bonny liquefaction plant. Offshore production facilities have been installed. Onshore activities regard the upgrading of the Yokri and North/South Bank flow stations and the construction of aThe first gas compression plant with a 233 mmCF/d capacity. Completion is expected in 2009.

In the OML 125, oil production deriving from Abo field. Ongoing development activities aim at reaching a peak productionthird quarter of 27 KBBL/d (18 KBBL/d net to Eni) in 2009. Production is supported by an FPSO unit with a 45 KBBL/d capacity and an 800 KBBL storage capacity.2010.

Eni holds a 10.4% interest in Nigeria LNG Ltd that manageswhich is responsible for the management of the Bonny liquefaction plant, located in the Eastern Niger Delta, withDelta. The plant has a design treatment capacity of approximately 1,236 BCF/y of feed gas corresponding to a production of 22 mmtonnes/y of LNG onfrom 6 trains. The seventh unit is

43


being engineered with start-up expectedas it is in 2012.the pre-fid phase. When fully operational, total capacity will amount to approximately 30 mmtonnes/y of LNG, corresponding to a feedstock of approximately 1,624 BCF/y. Natural gas supplies to the plant are provided under gas supply agreements with a 20-year term from the SPDC joint venture (Eni’s interest 5%) and the NAOC JV, the latter operating the OMLs 60, 61, 62 and 63.63 (Eni’s interest 20%). In 20082009, total supplies were 3,4611,798 mmCF/d (268(130 mmCF/d net to Eni corresponding to 4623 KBOE/d). LNG production is sold under long-termlong term contracts and exported to European and American markets by the Bonny Gas Transport fleet, wholly-owned by Nigeria LNG Co.

Eni is operator withalso has a 17% interest ofin the Brass LNG Ltd CompanyCo for the construction of a natural gas liquefaction plant tothat will be built near the existing Brass terminal.terminal which is 100 kilometers west of Bonny. This plant is expected to start operating in 20142015 with a production capacity of 10 mmtonnes/y of LNG corresponding to 618590 BCF/y (approximately 6460 net to Eni) of feed gas on 2 trains for twenty years. Supplies to this plant will derive from the collection of associated gas from nearby producing fields and from the development of gas reserves in the onshore OMLs 60 and 61 onshore blocks.61. The venture signed preliminary long-term contracts to sell the whole LNG production capacity. Eni acquired 1.67 mmtonnes/y of LNG capacity.capacity (corresponding to approximately 81 BCF/y). The frontLNG will be delivered to the United States market mainly at the re-gasification plant in Cameron, located in Louisiana. Eni’s capacity amounts to approximately 201 BCF/y. Front end engineering is underwayactivities continued during 2009 and the final investment decision is expected in 2009.at the end of 2010.

In the medium-term, management expects to increase Eni’s production in Nigeria to approximately 200190 KBOE/d, reflecting in particular the development of gas reserves.

North SeaKazakhstan

Eni’s operations in the North Sea area are conducted in Norway and United Kingdom. In 2008, the North Sea accounted for 13% of Eni’s total worldwide production of oil and natural gas.

Norway. Eni has been operating in Norway since 1964. Eni’s activities are performed in the Norwegian Sea, in the Norwegian section of the North Sea and in the Barents Sea. Eni’s production in Norway amounted to 126 KBOE/d in 2008.

Exploration and production activities in Norway are regulated by Production Licenses (PL). According to a Production License, the holder is entitled to perform seismic surveys and drilling and production activities for a few years with possible extensions.

In February 2008, following an international bid procedure, Eni was awarded the operatorship of 2 exploration licenses with a 40% and 65% stake, respectively, in the Barents Sea and further 3 licenses in the Norwegian Sea with stakes from 19.6% to 29.4%.

In May 2009, following an international bid procedure, Eni was awarded the operatorship of the PL 533 and PL 529 exploration permits with a 40% stake as well as a 30% interest of the PL 532 permit.

Eni holds interests in 6 production areas in the Norwegian Sea. The main producing fields are Aasgaard (Eni’s interest 14.82%), Kristin (Eni’s interest 8.25%), Heidrun (Eni’s interest 5.12%), Mikkel (Eni’s interest 14.9%) and Norne (Eni’s interest 6.9%) which in 2008 accounted for 67% of Eni’s production in Norway.

 

37


Activities in 2008 were aimed at maintaining production levels by means of sidetracking and infilling activities at the main producing fields. The main structures under development are located near Kristin, particularly Tyrihans (Eni’s interest 6.23%). Economic development of this field is expected to be achieved through synergies with the Kristin production facilities. Production is expected to start in 2009, in coincidence with the expected production decline of Kristin which will make spare capacity available to process production from Tyrihans. Pre-development activities are underway on recent oil and gas discoveries near Aasgaard field. In particular: (i) in May 2008, the relevant authorities sanctioned the development plan of the Morvin discovery. The basic design provides linkage to existing production facilities that will be upgraded. Production start-up is expected in 2010; and (ii) the drilling program at the Yttergryta field was completed. Production commenced at 81 mmCF/d in early 2009.

Eni holds interests in four production licenses in the Norwegian section of the North Sea. The main producing field is Ekofisk (Eni’s interest 12.39%) in PL018 which in 2008 produced 42 KBOE/d net to Eni and accounted for 33% of Eni’s production in Norway. Ongoing projects aim at maintaining and optimizing production at Ekofisk by means of infilling wells, the development of the South Area, upgrading of existing facilities and optimization of water injection.

Currently Eni is only performing exploration activities in Barents Sea. Operations in this area are focused on the appraisal of the mineral potential of the large Goliath discovery made in 2000 at a water depth of 370 meters in PL 229 (Eni operator with a 65% interest) aimed at its commercial development. The project is progressing according to schedule. Commencement is expected in 2013 with a production plateau at 100 kBBL/d. In 2008 contracts were awarded for the study of two possible development plans by means of a cylindrical FPSO unit. The final investment decision is expected in 2009.

Main discoveries for the year were achieved in the: (a) Prospecting License 312 (Eni’s interest 17%) with the Gamma gas discovery at a depth of about 2,500 meters. Production will be treated at the nearby Aasgaard facilities; (b) the Prospecting License 122 (Eni operator with a 20% interest), where appraisal activities confirmed the mineral potential of the Marulk discovery; (c) the Prospecting License 293 (Eni operator with a 45% interest), with the gas and condensate Aphrodite discovery. Ongoing pre-development activities aim to assessing the economic viability of the project; and (d) Prospecting License 128 (Eni’s interest 11.5%) with the Dompap gas discovery at a depth of about 2,750 meters. Appraisal activities are underway.

United Kingdom. Eni has been present in the United Kingdom since 1964. Eni’s activities are carried out in the British section of the North Sea, in the Irish Sea and in some areas East and West of the Shetland Islands. In 2008 Eni’s net production of oil and gas averaged 104 KBOE/d.

Exploration and production activities in the United Kingdom are regulated by concession contracts.

In November 2008, Eni finalized an agreement with the British company Tullow Oil to purchase a 52% stake and the operatorship of fields in the Hewett Unit in the British section of the North Sea and relevant facilities including the associated Bacton terminal. Eni acquired operatorship of the assets with an 89% interest. Eni aims to upgrade certain depleted fields in the area so as to achieve a gas storage facility with a 177 BCF working gas capacity to support seasonal upswings in gas demand in the UK leveraging on the strategic purchased facilities. The Bacton terminal, in fact, is very close to the incoming point of the Interconnector pipeline connecting the United Kingdom with Europe. For this purpose, Eni intend to request a storage license.

In December 2008 following an international bid procedure, Eni was awarded four exploration blocks with a 22% interest located in the Shetland Islands. One of the awarded blocks is located near the Tormore (Eni’s interest 20%) and Laggan (Eni’s interest 20%) recent gas discoveries in the North Sea.

38


Eni holds interests in 12 production areas in the British section of the North Sea. The main fields are Elgin/Franklin (Eni’s interest 21.87%), the J-Block (Eni’s interest 33%), Andrew (Eni’s interest 16.21%), Farragon (Eni’s interest 30%), the Flotta Catchment Area (Eni’s interest 20%) and Mac-Culloch (Eni’s interest 40%) which in 2008 accounted for 63% of Eni’s production in the United Kingdom. Development activities progressed at the West Franklin field (Eni’s interest 21.87%) by completing a second development well planned. The production is supported by facilities of the nearby Elgin/Franklin field which peaked at 20 KBOE/d (4 net to Eni). Other activities related to: (i) optimization of production in the J-Block through the upgrading of existing facilities; and (ii) infilling actions at the Flotta Catchment Area and Mac-Culloch fields targeting to maintain production levels. Development activities started at the Burghely field (Eni’s interest 21.92%). Pre-development activity continued on the Suilven discovery (Eni’s interest 8.75%).

Eni holds a 53.9% interest in 6 production fields in the Liverpool Bay area in the Eastern section of the Irish Sea. Main fields are Douglas, Hamilton and Lennox and their extension which in 2008 accounted for 24% of Eni’s production in UK. Facilities upgrading is underway.

Eni holds interest in 6 production permits located East of the Shetland Islands. Main fields are Ninian (Eni’s interest 12.94%) and Magnus (Eni’s interest 5%) which in 2008 accounted for 4% of Eni’s production in the United Kingdom. In 2008 maintenance and optimization actions were performed with the drilling of infilling wells.

Main discoveries for the year were achieved in the: (i) Block 16/23 (Eni’s interest 16.67%) with the Kinnoul oil and gas discovery which is planned to be developed in synergy with the production facilities of the Andrew field (Eni’s interest 16.21%); (ii) Block 30/6 (Eni’s interest 33%) where gas and condensates were found near the recent Jasmine discovery. Joint development of these two structures is being assessed in combination with existing facilities; and (iii) Block 22/25a (Eni’s interest 16.95%) with the gas and condensate Culzean discovery near the Elgin/Franklin producing field (Eni’s interest 21.87%). Study of development activities is underway.

Caspian Area

In 2008, Eni’s operations in the Caspian Area accounted for 7% of its total worldwide production of oil and natural gas.

Kazakhstan. Eni has been present in Kazakhstan since 1992. Eni is co-operator of the Karachaganak field and up to January 2009, acted as the single operator ofpartner in the North Caspian Sea Production Sharing Agreement (NCSPSA) activities.. In 2009, Eni’s operations in Kazakhstan accounted for 7% of its total worldwide production of oil and natural gas.

39


Kashagan. Eni holds a 16.81% participating interest in the NCSPSA. The change in the participating interest from a previous 18.52% was effective as of January 1, 2008 according to anIn November 2009, Eni signed a co-operation agreement signed in October 2008 with the Kazakh authorities. The Eni partners of this international consortium are the Kazakh national oil company KazMunayGas and the international oil companies Total, Shell and ExxonMobil, each with a participating interest currently of 16.81%, ConocoPhillips with 8.40%, and Inpex with 7.56% based on the renewed contractual arrangements.

The NCSPSA defines terms and conditions for the exploration and development activities to be performed in the area covered by the contract. The Kashagan field was discovered in the northern section of the contractual area in the year 2000. Management believes this field to contain a large amount of hydrocarbon resources.

The phased development plan of the Kashagan field provides for the drilling of about 240 wells and the construction of production plants located on artificial islands which will collect production from other satellite artificial islands. Oil production will be marketed. Natural gas will be mostly used (80%) for re-injection into the reservoir for maintaining pressure levels. The natural gas not re-injected will be treated for the removal of hydrogen sulphide and will be used as fuel in power generation for the production plants. The remaining amounts will be marketed.

As outlined above, on October 31, 2008, all the international partnersKazakh national oil company KazMunaiGas. This agreement envisages joint studies and activities to be performed on: (i) the preliminary evaluation of the Isatay and Shangala exploration areas located in the Northern Caspian Sea; (ii) gas utilization in Kazakhstan; and (iii) a

44


number of industrial initiatives including the upgrading of the Pavlodar refinery, in which KMG holds a majority interest.

Kashagan. Eni holds a 16.81% participating interest in the NCSPSA. The NCSPSA consortiumdefines terms and conditions for the exploration and development activities to be performed in an area encompassing approximately 4,600 square kilometers. The Kashagan field was discovered in the northern section of the contractual area in the year 2000. Management believes this field contains a large amount of hydrocarbon resources which will be developed in phases. The PSA on Kashagan will expire at the end of 2041.

The participating interest in the NCSPSA has been redefined, effective as of January 1, 2008, in line with an agreement signed in October 2008 with Kazakh authorities signed the final agreement implementing the new contractual and governance framework of the Kashagan project, based on the Memorandum of Understanding signed on January 14, 2008.

The material terms of the agreement are: (i) the proportional dilution ofwhich proportionally diluted the participating interest of all the international memberscompanies in favor of the Kashagan consortium, following which the stake held by theKazakh national Kazakh Company KazMunayGas and the stake held by the other four major stakeholders are each equal to 16.81%, effective from January 1, 2008.oil company, KazMunaiGas. The Kazakh partner will pay the other co-venturesco-venturers an aggregate amount of $1.78 billion; (ii) a value transfer package to be implemented through changes tobillion for the termstransaction. Eni partners of the NCSPA,international consortium are the amount of which will vary in proportion to future levels ofKazakh national oil prices. Eni is expected to contribute tocompany, KazMunaiGas, and the value transfer package in proportion to its newinternational oil companies Total, Shell and ExxonMobil, each with a participating interest currently of 16.81%, ConocoPhillips with 8.40%, and Inpex with 7.56%.

Exploration and development activities in the project (16.81%);Kashagan field and (iii) a newin the other discoveries made in the contractual area are executed through an operating model which entails an increased role of the Kazakh partner and defines the internationalInternational parties’ responsibilities in the execution of the subsequent development phases of the project. The new North Caspian Operating Company (NCOC) BV, has been established and capitalizedparticipated by the seven partners of the consortium. In January 2009 the new entityconsortium has taken over the operatorship of the project.project in January 2009. Subsequently development, drilling and production activities have been delegated by NCOC BV to the main partners of the Consortium.consortium: Eni is confirmed to bewill retain responsibility for the operator of phase-onePhase 1 of the project (the so-called "Experimental Program"“Experimental Program”) and in addition will retain operatorship offor the onshore operations of phase 2 of the development plan.Phase 2.

In conjunction with the signingagreement signed in October 2008, the Kazakh authorities approved a new schedule which foresees the production start-up by the end of the final agreements, the partners also reached2012 and a final approval of the revised expenditure budget of phase-onePhase 1 of the development plan,project, amounting to $32.2 billion (excluding general and administrative expenses) of whichwhich: $25.4 billion related tofor the execution of the original scope of work of phasePhase 1 (including tranches(tranches 1 and 2), with and the remaining part planned to be spent to executeportion for the execution of tranche 3 and buildconstruction of certain exporting facilities. Eni will fund those expendituresinvestments in proportion to its participating interest of 16.81%. Management expects to achieveis targeting first oil late in 2012 onby the basisend of progress to completion (55% of phase 1 of the project) and accumulated expertise and project know-how.2012. In the following 12-15 months treatmentprocessing facilities and compression units for gas re-injection will be entirely commissioned enabling the Consortium to deployenable an installed production capacity of 370 KBBL/d in 2014. Subsequently,Afterwards, production capacity of phase-one (Experimental Program)Phase 1 is expected to step-upstep up to 450 KBBL/d, leveraging on additional compressionavailability of further compressor capacity for gas re-injection associated with the start-upPhase 2 offshore facilities.

Phase 2 is currently in the stage of phase-two offshore facilities. In addition, within phase-one a rail terminal with carrying capacity at 300 KBBL/d of oil and 4,500 tonnes/d of sulphur will be built.Front End Engineering Design (FEED).

40


The development plan of the Kashagan field was originally sanctionedapproved by the Kazakh authorities in February 2004, contemplating a three-phasephased development scheme including partial gas re-injection in the reservoir to enhance the recovery factor of the crude oil. The sanctioned plan budgeted expenditures amounting to U.S. $10.3 billion (in 2007 real terms) to develop phase-one,Phase 1, with a target production level of 300 KBBL/d. First oil was originally scheduled to be produced by the end of 2008. Eni was expected to fund these expenditures according to its participating interest in this project. On June 29, 2007, Eni, as operator, filed withsubmitted to the relevant Kazakh authorities amendments to the sanctioned development plan. These amendments rescheduled the production start-up to 2010 and estimated development expenditures for phase-onePhase 1 at U.S. $19 billion. As outlined above the amended development plan that was sanctioned in October 2008 forecastforecasts production start-up in late in 2012 and an expenditure budget for phase onePhase 1 amounting to $25.4 billion. The production delay and cost overruns were driven by a number of factors:factors, such as: (i) depreciation of the U.S. dollar versus the euro and other currencies; (ii) cost price escalation of goods and services required to execute the project; (iii) an original underestimation of the costs and complexity to operate in the North Caspian Sea due to lack of benchmarks; and (iv) design changes to enhance the operability and safety standards of the offshore facilities.

TheManagement believes that the magnitude of the reserves base, the results of the well tests conducted and the findings of subsurface studies completed so far support expectations for a full field production plateau of 1.5 mmBBL/d, which represents a 25% increase above the original plateau as presented in the 2004 development plan. An independent reserve evaluation performed by a petroleum engineer (Ryder Scott Petroleum Consultants) fully supports the target production plateau.d. The achievement of the full field production plateau will require a materialrelevant amount of expenditures in addition to the development expenditures needed to complete the execution of phase-one.Phase 1. However, taking into account that future development expenditures will be incurred over a long time horizon,period, management does not expect any material impact on the company’sCompany’s liquidity or its ability to fund these capital expenditures.

In addition to the expenditures for developing the field, further capital expenditures will be required to upgrade or to build the infrastructures needed for exporting the production to international markets, for which various options are currently under review by the consortium.Consortium. These include: (i) the use of existing infrastructure, such as the Caspian Pipeline Consortium pipeline (Eni’s interest 2%) and the Atyrau-Samara pipeline, both of which are expected to undergo a capacity expansion; and (ii) the construction of a new transportation system.systems needed for phases subsequent to the experimental program. In this respect, it is worth mentioning the project aimed at building a line

45


connecting the onshore Bolashak production centrecenter with the Baku-Tbilisi-Cehyan pipeline (where Eni holds an interest of 5% corresponding to the right to transport 50 KBBL/d) through the KCTS pipeline to Kuryk and a further shipping across the Caspian Sea to Baku;Baku and (iii) the construction of a new transport system linking SamsumSamsun on the Turkish coast of the Black Sea to Cehyan on the Mediterranean coast in order to bypass the congested Turkish Straits of Bosporus and Dardanelles.

As of December 31, 2009, Eni’s proved reserves booked for the Kashagan field amounted to 588 mmBOE, recording a decrease of 6 mmBOE with respect to 2008.

As of December 31, 2008, Eni’s proved reserves booked for the Kashagan field amounted to 594 mmBOE determined according to Eni’s participating interest of 16.81%, recording an increase of 74 mmBOE with respect to 2007 despite the divestment of a 1.71% stake in the Kashagan project following the finalization of the agreements implementing the new contractual and governance framework of the project. The amount booked for the year reflected higher volume entitlements resulting from lower year end oil prices from a year ago and upward revisions of previous estimates which were supported by an independent evaluation of the field made by an oil engineering company (Ryder Scott Petroleum Consultants).

As of December 31, 2007, Eni’s proved reserves booked for the Kashagan field amounted to 520 mmBOE, recording a decrease of 76 mmBOE with respect to 2006 mainly due to the impact of increased year-end oil prices on reserve entitlements in accordance with the PSA scheme. Proved reserves for the field as of December 31, 2007 were determined according to Eni’s then current participating interest of 18.52%.

As of December 31, 2006, Eni’s proved reserves booked for the Kashagan field amounted to 596 mmBOE, recording an increase of 107 mmBOE with respect to 2005 due to an extension of the proved area and project cost revision, offset in part by the impact of price revisions.

As of December 31, 2008,2009, the aggregate costs incurred by Eni for the Kashagan project capitalized in the consolidated financial statements amounted to $3.3$4.5 billion (euro 2.43.1 billion at the EUR/USD exchange rate of December 31, 2008) net of the divestment of a 1.71% stake in the Kashagan project following the finalization of the agreements implementing the new contractual and governance framework of the project ($0.4 billion)2009). This capitalized amount included: (i) $2.3$3.4 billion relating to expenditures incurred by Eni for the development of the oilfield; and (ii) $1$1.1 billion relating primarily to accruedaccrue finance charges and expenditures for the acquisition of interests in the North Caspian Sea PSA consortium from exiting partners upon exercise of pre-emption rights in previous years.

As of December 31, 2008, the aggregate costs incurred by Eni for the Kashagan project capitalized in the consolidated financial statements amounted to $3.3 billion (euro 2.4 billion at the EUR/USD exchange rate of December 31, 2008) net of the divestment of a 1.71% stake in the Kashagan project following the finalization of the agreements implementing the new contractual and governance framework of the project ($0.4 billion). This capitalized amount included: (i) $2.3 billion relating to expenditures incurred by Eni for the development of the oilfield; and (ii) $1 billion relating primarily to accrued finance charges and expenditures for the acquisition of interests in the North Caspian Sea PSA consortium from exiting partners upon exercise of pre-emption rights in previous years.

Karachaganak. Located in West onshore Kazakhstan, Karachaganak is a liquid and gas field. Operations are conducted by the Karachaganak Petroleum Operating consortium (KPO) and are regulated by a Production Sharing Agreement lasting 40 years, until 2037. Eni and British Gas are co-operators of the venture both with a 32.5% interest.

In 2009, production of the Karachaganak field averaged 238 KBBL/d of liquids (70 net to Eni) and 883 mmCF/d of natural gas (241 net to Eni). This field is developed by producing liquids from the deeper layers of the reservoir and re-injecting the associated gas in the higher layers. Approximately two thirds of liquid production are stabilized at the Karachaganak Processing Complex (KPC) with a capacity in excess of 150 KBBL/d and exported to Western markets through the Caspian Pipeline

As of December 31, 2007, the aggregate costs incurred by Eni for the Kashagan project capitalized in the financial statements amounted to $2.6 billion. This capitalized amount included: (i) $1.8 billion relating to expenditures incurred by Eni for the development of the oilfield; and (ii) $0.8 billion relating primarily to accrued finance charges and expenditures for the acquisition of interests in the North Caspian Sea PSA consortium from exiting partners upon exercise of pre emption rights in previous years. The $2.6 billion amount was equivalent to euro 1.8 billion based on the 2007 year-end euro /U.S. dollar exchange rate.

4146


As of December 31, 2006 the aggregate costs incurred by Eni for the Kashagan project that were capitalized by Eni in its financial statements amounted to $1.9 billion, corresponding to euro 1.5 billion based on 2006 year-end exchange rates.

Costs borne by Eni to explore and develop this field are recovered in accordance with the mechanisms typically contemplated by a PSA scheme, which is widely used in the industry. In this type of contract the national oil company or State-owned entity assigns to the international oil company (the contractor) the task of performing exploration and production with the contractor’s equipment and financial resources. Exploration risks are borne by the contractor and production is generally divided into two portions: "cost oil" is used to recover costs borne by the contractor and "profit oil" is divided between the contractor and the national company according to variable schemes and represents the profit deriving from exploration and production. Accordingly, recoverability of the expenditures is subject to approval from the relevant State-owned or controlled entity who is party to the agreement. Similarly, cost overruns are recovered to the extent they are sanctioned by the State-owned or controlled entity who is party to the agreement.

Karachaganak. Located in West onshore Kazakhstan, Karachaganak is a liquid and gas field. Operations are conducted by the Karachaganak Petroleum Operating consortium (KPO) and are regulated by a Production Sharing Agreement lasting 40 years, until 2037. Eni and British Gas are co-operators of the venture both with a 32.5% interest.

In 2008 production from this field averaged 234 KBBL/d of liquids (69 KBBL/d net to Eni) and 774 mmCF/d of natural gas (227 mmCF/d net to Eni). This field is developed by producing liquids from the deeper layers of the reservoir and re-injecting the associated gas in the higher layers. Approximately two thirds of liquid production are stabilized at the Karachaganak Processing Complex (KPC) with a capacity in excess of 150 KBBL/d and exported to Western markets through the Caspian Pipeline Consortium (Eni’s interest 2%) and the Atyrau-Samara pipeline. The remaining third of non-stabilized liquid production and volumes of associated gas not re-injected in the reservoir are marketed at the Russian terminal in Orenburg.

The execution of a fourth oil treatment unit has been progressed toprogressing towards completion and will enable to increase the exported oil volumesexport to Western markets.

The Phase 3 project engineering activities have identified a staged approachwestern markets of currently non-stabilized liquids delivered to best develop the Karachaganak field. The first stage envisages the development of approximately 55 mmtonnes of liquids the doubling of the existing gas injection capacity (from 233 to 466 BCF/y) and the maintenance of a production plateau at 12 mmtonnes/y of stabilized liquids (until 2018) and 318 BCF/y of acid gas at Orenburg. An alternative option is under review which entails marketing of a portion of the additional gas re-injected. Start-up is expected late in 2013 subject to approval by the relevant authorities.

Orenburg terminal. The construction of the Uralsk Gas Pipeline is ongoing. This new infrastructure, with a length of 150 kilometers, will link the Karachaganak field to the Kazakhstan gas network. Start-up is expected in 2009.2010.

In April 2008,The engineering activities of Phase 3 of the Kazakh authorities approvedKarachaganak project identified a tax decree enacting an Export Duty on crude oil; such tax was applied on Karachaganak from July 2008staged approach to best develop the field. The project provides for the installation of gas producing and re-injection facilities to increase gas sales at the Orenburg plant up to January565 BCF/y and the liquids production up to approximately 14 mmtonnes/y. With the view to sanctioning the Phase 3, technical and commercial discussions with the relevant authority are ongoing.

As of December 31, 2009, when it was "zero rated". InEni’s proved reserves booked for the same monthKarachaganak field amounted to 633 mmBOE, recording a decrease of 107 mmBOE with respect to 2008 in connection to a downward revisions due to the authorities enacted a new tax code that does not affectimpact of higher oil prices and the profitability of this project taking into account that certain clauses in the PSA regulating the activities at the field provide the stabilityproduction of the tax burden for the ventures.year.

As of December 31, 2008, Eni’s proved reserves booked for the Karachaganak field amounted to 740 mmBOE, recording an increase of 200 mmBOE with respect to 2007 and derived fromas a result of the upward revisions of previous estimates that were mainly related to higher entitlements reported in PSA resulting from lower year end oil prices from a year ago.

As of December 31, 2007, Eni’s proved reserves booked for the Karachaganak field amount to 541 mmBOE, recording a decrease of 82 mmBOE with respect to 2006 as a result of downward and upward revisions of previous estimates. Downward revisions mainly related to an adverse price impact in determining volume entitlements in accordance with the PSA scheme. These negative revisions were partly offset by upward revisions that mainly related to the finalization of thea revised gas sale contract as outlined above.contract.

42


Turkmenistan. Eni started its activities in Turkmenistan in connection with the purchaseRest of British company Burren Energy plc in 2008. Activities are mainly focusedAsia

In 2009, Eni’s operations in the western partrest of the country. In 2008 Eni’s production averaged 12 KBOE/d.

Exploration and production activities in Turkmenistan are regulated by Production Sharing Agreements.

Eni is operator of the Nebit Dag producing block (with a 100% interest). Production derives mainly from the Burun oil field.

During 2008, the development activities were focused at the production optimization by means of drilling development wells and carry-over of the programAsia accounted for water injection and facility upgrading.

The drilling activity at Uzboy and Balkan fields, nearby Burun field, progressed. The fields achieved early production in 2006.

Rest of the World

In 2008, Eni’s operations in the rest of world accounted for 14%8% of its total worldwide production of oil and natural gas.

Australia. Eni has been present in Australia since 2000. In 2008 Eni’s production of oil and natural gas averaged 16 KBOE/d. Activities are focused on conventional and deep offshore fields.

The main production blocks in which Eni holds interests are WA-25-L (Eni operator with a 65% interest) and JPDA 03-13 (Eni’s interest 10.99%). In the exploration phase Eni holds interests in 13 licenses (in 7 as operator and in 5 of which with a 100% interest), of particular interest are the blocks WA-33-L and WA-313-P, where the Blacktip and Penguin discoveries are located.

Exploration and production activities in Australia are regulated by concessions, while in the cooperation zone between East Timor and Australia (Joint Petroleum Development Area - JPDA) they are regulated by PSAs.

The main producing fields are Woollybutt and Bayu Undan in WA-25-L and JPDA03-13, respectively.

In 2008 development activities have been completed in the southern area of the Woollybutt oil field with a new horizontal production well that was linked to an FPSO unit with relevant production ramp-up in July 2008.

Development activities are underway at the Blacktip gas field (Eni operator with a 100% interest). The development strategy envisages installation of an unmanned platform that will be linked to an onshore treatment plant. Start-up is expected in 2009, peaking at 26 BCF/y in 2010. Natural gas production is destined to supply a power plant.

In 2008, an important discovery was made in the Block JPDA 06-105 (Eni operator with a 40% interest), located in the international offshore cooperation zone between East Timor and Australia, where the Kitan discovery showed the presence of oil at a depth of 3,658 meters and yielded 6.1 KBBL/d in test production. In June 2008, the oilfield development area was approved by the Timor Sea Designated Authority pursuant to the declaration of commercial discovery that was made by Eni. Activities are ongoing for the preparation of a development plan to be filed with relevant authorities. The final investment decision is expected in 2009.

In the medium-term, management expects to increase Eni’s production in Australia through ongoing development activities.

Brazil. Eni has been present in Brazil since 1999 and is performing exploration activities in: (i) operated blocks BM-S-4 and BM-S-857, subjected official awarding, (both with a 100% interest) located in the deep offshore in the Santos basin; (ii) block BM-CAL-14 (Eni operator with a 100% interest) in the deep offshore in the Camamu-Almada basin.

The current exploration program aims at appraising the Belmonte gas discovery in block BM-S-4.

43


In 2008 Eni and Petrobras renewed a Memorandum of Understanding signed on 2007 aimed at identifying joint production and refining opportunities. Eni will make available its EST (Eni Slurry Technology) proprietary technology for the complete conversion of heavy oils (typical of the Brazilian upstream) into high-quality light products.

China. Eni has been present in China since 1984. Activities1984 and its activities are located in the South China Sea. In 20082009 Eni’s production amounted to 8 KBOE/d.

Exploration and production activities in China are regulated by Production Sharing Agreements.

Production derives mainlyHydrocarbons are produced from the offshore blocks 16/08 and 16/0919 operated by the CACT-Operating Group (Eni’s interest 16.33%). Oil, production, destined towhich is sold into the domestic market, mainlyis produced from seven platforms connected to a FPSO; the greater portion of Eni oil production derives from the HZ25-4 field (Eni’s interest 49%) through fixed platforms underwater linked to an FPSO.. Natural gas production from the HZ21-1 field is delivered through a sealine to the Zhuhai treatment plant.Terminal, close to Macao and sold to the Chinese National Company CNOOC.

During 2009, development activities were mainly focused on the HZ25-4 and the HZ25-3/1 fields. The development of the HZ25-4 field, on stream since 2007, continued with the drilling of additional producing wells as planned, while on HZ25-3/1, following the installation of the production platform, the drilling of the producing wells continued.

 

Ongoing development activities are mainly focused on the HZ25-4 and the HZ25-3/1 fields, on the latter the construction of a production platform is ongoing and start-up is expected in 2009. The development plan of the HZ25-4 field, on stream since 2007, provides for the drilling of addition producing wells as planned.

Colombia. In 20082009 Eni signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the national oil company Ecopetrol aimed at identifying joint opportunities for explorationPSAs related to Blocks 3/27 and production in Colombia and in other Southern American countries.

Croatia. Eni has been present in Croatia since 1996. In 2008 Eni’s production of natural gas averaged 66 mmCF/d. Activities are deployed in the Adriatic Sea facing the city of Pula.

Exploration and production activities in Croatia are regulated by PSAs.

The main producing gas fields are Ivana, Ika & Ida, Marica and Katerina operated by Eni through a 50/50 joint venture with the Croatian oil company INA. In 2008 the Ana field (Eni’s interest 50%) was started-up through linkage to the facilities existing in the area.

Development activities are nearing completion in the Irina, Vesna and Annamaria fields. Start-ups are expected in 2009.

Exploration activities yielded positive results in the Bozica (Eni’s interest 50%) and the Ika gas fields with appraisal activity.

East Timor. Eni entered East Timor in 2006 and is operator with an 80% interest of 5 offshore blocks. The first exploration phase of the exploration plan with a three-year term provides for the acquisition seismic data which was completed during the year, and the drilling of 2 wells.

Ecuador. Eni has been present in Ecuador since 1988. In 2008 Eni’s production averaged 16 KBBL/d. Since 2000, Eni became operator of Block 10 (Eni’s interest 100%)28/20 located in the Amazon forest and on which Villano field has been discovered.South China Sea covering a total acreage of 18,194 square kilometers. Eni’s participating interest in the exploration stage is equal to 100%.

Exploration and production activities in Ecuador are regulated by a service contract.

4447


Production derives from the Villano field, started-up in 1999. Production is carried out by means of a Central Production Facility linked by pipeline to the storage facility. During the year work-over and infilling activities were aimed to contrast the natural depletion.

India. Eni has been present in India since 2005.

In August 2008, Eni acquired control of the Indian company Hindustan Oil Exploration Co Ltd (HOEC) following the execution of a mandatory tender offer on a 20% stake of the HOEC share capital. The mandatory offer was associated with Eni’s acquisition of a 27.18% of HOEC as part of the Burren Energy deal.

In 2009 production started-up from the PY-1 gas field which is part of the assets acquired from Hindustan Oil Exploration Co Ltd. Gas production is sold to the local national oil company.

Other activities are related to the exploration of the onshore Block RJ-ONN-2003/1 (Eni operator with a 34% interest) and offshore Blocks AN-DWN-2003/2 (Eni operator with a 40% interest) and MN-DWN-2002/1 (Eni’s interest 34%).

Indonesia. Eni has been present in Indonesia since 2001. In 2009, Eni’s production, mainly composed of gas, amounted to 18 KBOE/d. Activities are concentrated in the eastern offshore and onshore of Borneo, the offshore Sumatra, and the offshore and onshore area of the West Timor; in total, Eni holds interest in 12 blocks.

In November 2009, Eni was awarded a 37.8% participating interest in the new Sanga Sanga PSA in connection with coal bed methane (CBM) production. The PSA defines terms and conditions for the exploration, development and production of gas from

shallow levels of coal within a contractual area that mostly coincides with the one regulated by the Sanga Sanga PSA for the production of conventional hydrocarbons. Exploration activity start-up is expected in 2010. If the results of these preliminary activities are positive, the project will benefit from the opportunities of synergy provided by the existing production and treatment facilities in Sanga Sanga and the Bontang LNG plant.

Exploration and production activities in Indonesia are regulated by PSAs.

In 2009, the development plan of the Jau field in the Krueng Mane Block (Eni’s interest 75%) located offshore of Sumatra was submitted to the relevant Authority. Eni is evaluating major development opportunities for the development of the oil and gas discoveries in the Bukat permit (Eni operator with a 66.25% interest) and for the five gas discoveries in the Kutei Deep Water Basin area (Eni’s interest 20%).

Positive results in the exploration activity were achieved with the Jangkrik gas discovery located in the Muara Bakau Block (Eni’s interest 55%) offshore Borneo.

Iraq. On January 22, 2010 Eni leading a consortium of international companies and the Iraqi national oil companies, South Oil Co and Missan Oil

48


Co signed a technical service contract, with a 20-year term with an option for further 5 years, to develop the Zubair oil field (Eni 32.8%). The field was awarded in October 2009 to the Eni-led consortium following a successful first bid round and was offered under a competitive bid process beginning on June 30, 2009. The partners of the Indian Company Hindustan Oil Exploration Ltd (HOEC) following executionproject plan to gradually increase production to a target plateau level of 1.2 mmBOE/d over the next six years. The contract provides that the consortium will earn a mandatory tender offerremuneration fee on the incremental oil production once production has been raised by 10 percent from its current level of approximately 180 KBBL/d and will recover its expenditures through a 20% stakecost recovery mechanism based on the revenues from the field’s production.

The field development will take place in two phases: (i) the Rehabilitation Plan, which will improve the existing production rate to gain full knowledge of the HOEC share capital. The mandatory offer was associated with Eni’s acquisition of a 27.18% of HOEC as part of the Burren Energy deal. Assets acquired, located onshore in the Cambay Basin and offshore Chennai, include: (i) development and producing assets which are expected to reach a production plateau of 10 KBOE/d in 2010;reservoir and (ii) fields where exploration and appraisal activities are underway. Main development activities are focused on the PY1 gas field. Start-up is expected in 2009.

Other activities are related to exploration of the onshore Block RJ-ONN-2003/1 (Eni operator with a 34% interest) and offshore Blocks AN-DWN-2003/2 (Eni operator with a 40% interest) and MN-DWN-2002/1 (Eni’s interest 34%).

The exploration program for Block RJ-ONN-2003/1 located in the desert of Rajasthan provides for the drilling of 4 wells in the first four years of the license. Any hydrocarbons discoveredRedevelopment Plan, which will be sold locally.

The exploration program for Block AN-DWN-2003/2 near the Andaman Islands provides for the drilling of 3 wells in the first four years of the license and expected start-up in 2010.

The exploration program for Block AN-DWN-2002/1 located in the deep offshore of the eastern coast provides for the drilling of 3 wells in the first year of the license.

Indonesia. Eni has been present in Indonesia since 2000. Eni’sincrease production amounted to 16 KBOE/d, mainly gas, in 2008. Activities are concentrated in the eastern offshore and onshore of Borneo and the offshore Sumatra, where Eni holds interest in 11 blocks.

In May 2008, following an international bid procedure, Eni was awarded the operatorship of the West Timor exploration block extending over an offshore and onshore area of about 4,000 square kilometers.

Exploration and production activities in Indonesia are regulated by PSAs.

Production consists mainly of gas and derives from the Sanga Sanga permit (Eni’s interest 37.81%) with seven production fields. This gas is treated at the Bontang liquefaction plant, one of the largest in the world, and is exported to the Japanese, South Korean and Taiwanese markets.

Eni as operator is evaluating major development opportunities in the Bukat permit (Eni’s interest 66.25%) where oil and gas discoveries were recently made. Eni, as partner, is also involved in the ongoing joint development of the five discoveries in the Kutei Deep Water Basin area (Eni’s interest 20%), gas production of which will be sent to the Bontang LNG plant.

During 2008, the exploration activity was focused: (i) in the Krueng Mane permit (Eni operator with a 85% interest), with the start-up of the drilling activities; and (ii) in the Bukat permit, with the finalization of a seismic data acquisition campaign.target plateau.

Iran.Eni has been present in Iran since 1957. In 2008 Eni’s production averaged 28 KBBL/d. Activities are concentrated in the offshore and onshore facing of the Persian Gulf.

Exploration and production activities in Iran are regulated by buy-back contracts.

The main producing fields are South Pars phases 4&5currently limited mainly to the implementation of two buyback contracts signed between 2000 and 2001. Specifically, in 2009 activities were executed on the Darquain project which related to plant commissioning and start-up in view of making formal hand over of operations to local partners at some point in 2010. Darquain was the sole Eni-operated project in the offshorecountry. With regard to another project, Eni’s involvement essentially consists of the Persian Gulf and Darquain field located onshore which accountedbeing reimbursed for 91% ofits past investments. In 2009, Eni’s production in Iran in 2008. Eni also holds interests in the Dorood field (Eni’s interest 45%).

The main project regards the Darquain field operated by Eni with a 60% interest. Upgrading activities are underway by means of drilling additional wells, increasing capacitywas 35 KBOE/d, approximately 2% of the existing treatment plant and gas injection. These actions aim at increasing production from the present 100 KBBL/d to over 160 KBBL/d (14 net to Eni) by 2009.

The legislation and other regulations of the United States of America impose sanctions on this country and may lead to the imposition of sanctions on any persons doing business in this country or with Iranian counterparties. Particularly, under the Iran Sanctions Act of 1996 (as amended, "ISA"), which implements sanctions against Iran with the objective of denying it the ability to support acts of international terrorism and fund the development or acquisition

45


of weapons of mass destruction, upon receipt by the U.S. authorities of information indicating potential violation of this act, the President of the United States is authorized to start an investigation aiming at possibly imposing sanctions from a six-sanction menu against any person found in particular to have knowingly made investments of U.S. $20 million or more in any twelve-month period, contributing directly and significantly to the enhancement of Iran’s ability to developGroup’s worldwide production. Eni does not believe that its hydrocarbons resources. Furthermore, the ISA envisages that the President of the United States is bound to impose sanctions against any persons that knowingly contribute to certain military programs of Iran, effective on June 6, 2006. Eni cannot predict interpretations of, or the implementation policy of the U.S. Government under, ISA with respect to Eni’s current or future activities in Iran or other areas. Eni has incurred capital expenditures in excess of U.S. $20 million in Iran in each ofhave a material impact on the last 9 years. Management expects to continue investing in Iran yearly amounts in excess of that threshold in the foreseeable future. Eni’s current activities in Iran are primarily limited to carrying out residual development activities relating to certain buyback contracts it entered into in 2000 and 2001 and no sanctions have ever been imposed on Eni’s activities in the country. It is possible that in future years Eni’s activities in Iran may be sanctioned under relevant U.S. legislation.Group’s results.

Pakistan. Eni has been present in Pakistan since 2000. In 20082009 Eni’s production averaged 5456 KBOE/d and is mainly gas.

Exploration and production activities in Pakistan are regulated by concessions (onshore) and PSAs (offshore).

In March 2009, Eni signed a Protocol for Cooperation with the government of Pakistan to developwhich foresees the possible development of a number of important upstream, midstream and downstream projects in the Country.country. This deal followsis in line with Eni’s growth strategy throughof consolidating its position as principle international operator in the discovery of new reserves.country. Eni will provide its expertiseknow-how as well as new technologies developed in the oil and gas sector, mainly in the exploration and production of hydrocarbon fields.sector.

Eni’s main permits in the Country are Bhit (Eni operator with a(Eni’s interest 40% interest)), Sawan (Eni’s interest 23.68%) and Zamzama (Eni’s interest 17.25%17.75%), which in 20082009 accounted for 90%88% of Eni’s production in Pakistan.Pakistan

As part of the reserve development ofDevelopment activities were focused on: (i) the Bhit permitfield with the operationsongoing installation of a compressor plant aimed at maintaining the current production plateau; (ii) the Sawan field where construction activity of a compressor plant is ongoing; and (iii) the Zamzama permit where activities on the third treatment unit started increasingplant for the plant capacity by 46 mmCF/d and allowingproduction of high calorific value (HCV) gas are aimed at optimizing current production. During the start-up of the satellite Badhra field. Otheryear additional activities were targeted at optimizing production from the Kadanwari, Miano,Bhit, Sawan and ZamzamaKadanwari fields by meansdrilling additional wells.

Positive results from exploration activity were obtained with discoveries in the Badhra (Eni operator with a 40% interest), Kadanwari (Eni operator with an 18% interest) and Miano (Eni’s interest 15%) areas. The start-up timing of these recent discoveries will benefit from the proximity to existing producing facilities.

Russia. Eni has been present in Russia since 2007 following the acquisition of Lot 2 in the liquidation of Yukos.

In September 2009, Eni and its Italian partner Enel in the 60-40% owned joint-venture OOO SeverEnergia completed the divestment of the drilling additional wells51% stake in the venture to Gazprom based on the call option exercised by the Russian company. Currently Eni’s interest is 29.4%. Eni collected the total cash consideration ($940 million), 25% of which had been collected at the transaction date and upgrading the existing facilities.

Main discoveriesremaining 75% on March 31, 2010. A gain in amount of euro 100 million was recognized in the profit and loss account for the year were made in: (a)ended December 31, 2009. The gain was associated with interest income at an annual rate of 9.4% accruing on the Mubarak Block (Eni’s interest 38%) withinitial investment in the Saquibventure when it was acquired on April 4, 2007 based on the contractual arrangements between Eni and Gazprom. The three partners are committed to producing the first gas discovery which was tested atfrom the Samburskoye field by June 2011, targeting a production rateplateau of 2,472 KCF/d; and (b) the Latif exploration license, where the Latif-2 appraisal well has confirmed the hydrocarbon potential of the area.

Papua New Guinea. In 2008 Eni signed a Partnership Agreement with Papua New Guinea for150 KBOE/d within two years from the start of an exploration program aimed at identifying development opportunities and oil and gas projects.production.

In April 2009, Gazprom exercised its call option to purchase a 20% interest in OAO Gazprom Neft held by Eni based on the existing agreements between the two partners. The agreement provides also for projects in electrical power generation and unconventional and renewable energy sources, which will foster sustainable development in this country.

Qatar. In 2008exercise price of the call option collected by Eni signed a Memorandum of Understanding withon April 24, 2009 amounted to euro 3,070 million is equal to the state-owned company Qatar Petroleum International to target joint investment opportunitiesprice ($3.7 billion) outlined in the explorationbid procedure for the assets of the bankrupt Russian company Yukos as adjusted by subtracting dividends distributed and adding the contractual yearly remuneration of 9.4% on the capital employed and financing collateral expenses. Eni and Gazprom signed new cooperation agreements targeting certain development projects to be conducted jointly in Russia and other countries of interest.

49


Americas

In 2009, Eni’s operations in America area accounted for 9% of its total worldwide production of oil and natural gas. The agreement also envisages the development of joint projects in the petrochemical industry and power generation.

Russia. Eni has been present in Russia since 2007 following the acquisition of Lot 2 in the Yukos liquidation procedure.

In particular, acquired assets included three Russian companies operating in the exploration and development of natural gas reserves: OAO Arctic Gas Co, ZAO Urengoil Inc and OAO Neftegaztechnologia.

The three companies are managed by the OOO SeverEnergia subholding, owned by Eni (60%) and Enel (40%). Eni and Enel granted to Gazprom a call option on a 51% interest in OOO SeverEnergia. Terms of the call option are currently under review by Eni, Enel and Gazprom.

Acquired companies are located in the Yamal Nenets region: (i) OAO Arctic Gas Co owns two exploration licenses, Sambugurskii and Yevo-Yahinskii including seven gas and condensates fields currently in the appraisal/development phase. Main fields are

46


Sambugorskoye currently under development and Urengoiskoye. The final investment decision for both fields is expected in 2009 with production start-up in 2010; (ii) ZAO Urengoil Inc owns exploration and development licenses for the Yaro-Yakhinskoye gas and condensates field. Ongoing are representend by workovers of some existing wells and by new seismic acquisition; and (iii) OAO Neftegaztechnologia owns the exploration and development license of the Severo-Chasselskoye field where an acquisition of seismographic data is underway.

Other activities concern exploration in the Karalatskiy block (Eni’s interest 54%) in the Astrakhan region. This exploration license is part of the assets acquired from Burren Energy Plc.

Saudi Arabia. Eni entered Saudi Arabia in 2004 and is performing exploration activities in the so called C Area in order to discover and develop gas reserves. This license is located in the Rub Al Khali basin at the border with Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. The exploration plan provides for the drilling of 4 wells in five years. In case of a commercial discovery, the contract will last 25 years with a possible extension to a maximum of 40 years. Any gas discovered will be sold locally for power generation and as feedstock for petrochemical plants. Condensates will be sold on international markets.

Trinidad and Tobago. Eni has been present in Trinidad &and Tobago since 1970. In 20082009, Eni’s production averaged 5567 mmCF/d. Activityd and its activity is concentrated offshore north of Trinidad.

Exploration and production activities in Trinidad &and Tobago are regulated by PSAs.

Production is provided by the Chaconia, Ixora and Hibiscus gas fields in the North Coast Marine Area 1 Block (Eni’s interest 17.4%). Production is supported by fixed platforms linked to the Hibiscus treatment facility. Natural gas is used to feed trains 2, 3 and 4 of the Atlantic LNG liquefaction plant under long-term contracts. LNG production is sold in the United States, Spain and the Dominican Republic.

The main development project concernsrelates to the Poinsettia, Bougainvillea and Heliconia fields.fields in the North Coast Marine Area 1. The project provides for the installation of a production platform on the Poinsettia field and linkedthe linkage to the Hibiscus treatment facility due to bewhich was already upgraded. During the yearThe drilling activity was started. Production start-upprogram on Heliconia and Bougainvillea fields is underway. Start-up is expected in 2009.2010. In 2009 production started at the Poinsettia field.

United States. Eni has been present in the United States since 1966.1968. Activities are performed in the conventional and deep offshore in the Gulf of Mexico and more recently onshore and offshore in Alaska.

In 20082009, Eni’s oil and gas production derivingis mainly derived from the Gulf of Mexico averaged 86with an average of 117 KBOE/d.

47


Exploration and production activities in the United States are regulated by concessions.

50


Eni holds interests in 412370 exploration and production blocks in the Gulf of Mexico of which 60% operated.are operated by Eni.

The main fields operated by Eni with a 100% interest are Allegheny, East Breaks and Morphet as well as Devils Towers, Triton and Goldfinger (Eni operator with a 75% interest). Eni also holds interests in the Medusa (Eni’s interest 25%), Europa (Eni’s interest 32%), and King Kong (Eni operator with a 56% interest) fields.

In March 2008, following an international bid procedure Eni was awarded 32 exploration blocks. The subsequent development phase will leverage synergies relating to the proximity of acquired acreage to existing operated facilities.

In August 2008, Eni was awarded 5 exploration licenses in the Keathley Canyon area, one of the main exploration areas in the Gulf of Mexico. The blocks will be 100% operated by Eni. The transaction is subject to authorization from relevant authorities.

In November 2008 Eni signed a cooperation agreement with the Colombian state company Ecopetrol for exploration assets in the Gulf of Mexico. Under the terms of this agreement, Ecopetrol will invest approximately $220 million to acquire a 20-25% interest in five exploration wells due to be drilled before 2012.

The development program of the Longhorn discovery (Eni’s interest 75%) was sanctioned. The project provides for the installation of a fixed platform linked to three underwater wells. Start-up is expected in 2009 with peak production at 29 KBOE/d (about 20 net to Eni).

Main discoveries for the year were madeIn May 2009, Eni signed a strategic alliance with Quicksilver Resources Inc, an independent U.S. natural gas producer, to acquire a 27.5% interest in the following blocks: (a) Block Mississippi Canyon 771Alliance area, located in the Fort Worth basin of Texas. The acquisition for cash consideration amounting to $280 million includes gas shale production assets with 40 mmBBL of resources base. Production plateau at 10 KBOE/d net to Eni is expected in 2011.

In 2009, production start-up was achieved in the Gulf of Mexico as follows: (i) the Thunderhawk field (Eni’s interest 25%) through the drilling of underwater wells and linkage to a semi submersible production unit with thea treatment capacity of 45 KBBL/d of oil and gas Kodiak discovery close toabout 71 mmCF/d of natural gas; (ii) the operated Devil’s Tower platformLonghorn field (Eni’s interest 75%); (b) Block Walker Ridge 508 through the drilling of underwater wells and installation of production platform with a treatment capacity of approximately 247 mmCF/d; and (iii) the Leo field (Eni’s interest 15%75%) the Stones-3 discovery well found oil. This discovery is partby means of the exploration assets acquired from Dominion Resources; (c) Block Mississippi Canyon 459linkage to the Longhorn production facilities.

The development plan of the Appaloosa discovery (Eni’s interest 100%) was approved. The discovery is planned to be developed in synergy with the Appaloosa oil discovery. The final investment decision was reached at the end of 2008.Longhorn production facilities. Start-up is expected in 2010 with peak production peaking at 7.5 KBBL/d; (d) Block Keathley Canyon 1008 (Eni’s interest 100%) with appraisal1.5 KBOE/d.

Offshore exploration activities ofyielded positive results in the Hadrian oil discovery; and (e) Block offshorefollowing blocks: (i) Green Canyon 859 (Eni’s interest 12.5%) with the oil and gas Heidelberg-1 discovery at a depth of 9,163 meters.

Eni’s activities in Alaska are currently indiscovery; and (ii) Keathley Canyon 919 (Eni’s interest 25%) with the explorationoil and development phase in 158 blocks with interests ranging from 10 to 100%, over half as operator.

In February 2008, following an international bid procedure Eni was awarded 18 offshore exploration blocks, 4 of which as operator, in the Chukchi Sea. The acquired acreage will strengthen Eni’s position in the area.

The phased development plan of the Nikaitchuq field (Eni operator with a 100% interest) was sanctioned. Production is expected to start in 2010 with production plateau at 26 KBOE/d.gas Hadrian West discovery.

 

In June 2008, production started atEni holds interests in 173 exploration and development blocks in Alaska, with interests ranging from 10 to 100% and over half of these blocks, Eni is the operator.

The Oooguruk oil field (Eni’s interest 30%), in the Beaufort Sea, by linkingwas Eni’s only producing asset in Alaska. In 2009, production amounted to onshore facilities6 KBBL/d (2 KBBL/d net to Eni).

There are ongoing activities relating to the phased development plan of the Nikaitchuq field (Eni’s interest 100%) which is located on an artificial island. Peak production at 17 KBOE/din the North Slope basins. The first oil is expected in 2011.

In the medium-term, management expects to increase Eni’s2011 with peaking production due to the development and integration of assets acquired and the start-up of fields in Alaska, targeting at approximately 110 KBOE/d in 2012.28 KBBL/d.

Venezuela. Eni has been present in Venezuela since 1998. In 20082009, Eni’s production averaged 58 KBBL/d.

Activity is concentrated in the Gulf of Venezuela and in the Gulfo de Paira.Paria.

48


Exploration and production are regulated by the terms of the so called Empresa Mixta. Under the new legal framework, only a company incorporated under the law of Venezuela is entitled to conduct petroleum operations. A stake of at least 60% in the capital of such company is held by an affiliate of the Venezuela Statestate oil company, PDVSA, preferably Corporación Venezuelana de Petróleo (CVP).

In February 2008, Eni and the Venezuelan Authorities reached a final settlement over the dispute regarding the expropriation of the Dación field which took place on April 1, 2006. Under the terms of the settlement, Eni will receive cash compensation in line with the carrying amount of the expropriated asset. Part of this cash compensation has been collected in the period. Eni believes this settlement represents an important step towards improving and strengthening cooperation with the PDVSA.

As part of improving cooperation with PDVSA, the two partners signed two agreements in September 2008: (i) a joint study agreement for the development of the Junin Block 5 located in the Orinoco oil belt, covering a gross acreage of 670 square kilometers. Once relevant studies have been performed and a development plan defined, a joint venture between PDVSA and Eni will be established to execute the project. Eni intends to contribute its experience and leading technology to the project in order to maximize the value of the heavy oil; and (ii) an agreement for the exploration of two offshore areas, Blanquilla and Tortuga in the Caribbean Sea, both with a 20% interest over an area of 5,000 square kilometers. The prospective development of these areas will take place through an integrated LNG project.

In 2008, production started at the Corocoro field (Eni’s interest 26%) field is Eni’s only producing asset in the Gulfo de Paira West Block.country. A second development phase is expected to be designed based on the results achieved in the first one regardingdevelopment phase relating to the well

51


production rate and field performance under water and gas injection. A production peak of 6640 KBBL/d (17(10 net to Eni) is expected in 2012.

Eni holds an interest of 50%A large gas discovery was made in the Perla field, located in the Cardon IV offshoreblock (Eni 50%) in the Gulf of Venezuela, yielding 21 mmCF/d (approximately 3.7 KBOE/d) during flow tests. The field has been estimated to contain significant amount of resources. The Perla 2 well has been successfully drilled. The appraisal activity is progressing. Management expects to rapidly commence development activities, targeting early production in 2013.

On January 26, 2010 Eni and the Venezuelan National Oil Company, PDVSA, signed an agreement for the joint development of the giant field Junin 5, located in the Orinoco oil belt. Production start-up is planned for 2013 at an initial level of 75 KBBL/d and a target of long term production plateau of 240 KBOE/d. Development will be conducted through an "Empresa Mixta" (Eni 40%, PDVSA 60%). At the time of the establishment of the "Empresa Mixta", Eni will pay a bonus of $300 million, and additional amount of $346 million will be paid upon the achievement of certain project milestones. Finally, Eni will present a project for the construction of a power plant in Guiria peninsula.

Eni also holds interest in the Blanquilla and Tortuga exploration block, coveringblocks in the Caribbean Sea, both with a 20% interest over an area of 938approximately 5,000 square kilometers.

Eni is participating with 19.5% interest in the Gulfo de PairaParia Centrale offshore exploration block, covering an area of 259 square kilometers, where the Punta Sur oil discovery is located.

Australia and Oceania

Eni’s operations in Australia and Oceania area are conducted mainly in Australia. In 2009, Australia and Oceania area accounted for 1% of Eni’s total worldwide production of oil and natural gas.

Australia. Eni has been present in Australia since 2000. In 2009 Eni’s production of oil and natural gas averaged 16 KBOE/d. Activities are focused on conventional and deep offshore fields.

The main production blocks in which Eni holds interests are WA-33-L (Eni’s interest 100%), WA-25-L (Eni operator with a 65% interest) and JPDA 03-13 (Eni’s interest 10.99%). In the exploration phase Eni holds interests in 13 licenses (in 8 as operator and in 4 of which with a 100% interest), of particular interest are the Alberts blocks (WA-362/363/386/387-P) and JPDA 06-15 (Eni’s interest 40%), where the Kitan discovery is located. The Kitan development activities started in April 2010.

Exploration and production activities in Australia are regulated by concession agreements, whereas in the cooperation zone between East Timor and Australia (Joint Petroleum Development Area - JPDA) they are regulated by PSAs.

In 2009, production start-up was achieved at the Blacktip gas field (Eni’s interest 100%) located in the north western offshore in the South Bonaparte basin by means of a production platform linked to an onshore treatment plant with a capacity of 42 BCF/y. Natural gas produced from this field is sold under a 25-year contract signed with Power & Water Utility Co to fuel a power plant. In 2010 a production of 71 mmCF/d is expected.

Ongoing further development phase (phase 2) of the Bayu Undan field (Eni’s interest 10.99%) is underway aimed at increasing liquids production and maintaining the field’s production profile.

In the medium-term, management expects to increase Eni’s production in Australia through ongoing development activities.

 

Capital Expenditures

See "Item 5 – Liquidity and Capital Resources – Capital Expenditures by Segment".

 

Storage

Natural gas storage activities are performed by Stoccaggi Gas Italia SpA (Stogit) to which such activity was conferred on October 31, 2001 by Eni SpA and Snam SpA, in compliance with Article 21 of Legislative Decree No. 164 of May 23, 2000, which provides for the separation of storage from other activities in the field of natural gas.

Storage services are provided by Stogit through eight storage fields located in Italy, based on ten storage concessions3 vested by the Ministry of Productive Activities.

In 2008, the share of storage capacity used by third parties was 61%. From the beginning of its operations, Stogit markedly increased the number of customers served and the share of revenues from third parties; the latter, from a non-significant value, passed to 50%.

Storage 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
Available capacity:        
- modulation and mineral (BCM) 8.4 8.5 8.6
  . share utilized by Eni (%) 54 44 39
- strategic (BCM) 5.1 5.1 5.1
Total customers (No.) 38 44 48



Until 2008, results of the storage activities in Italy have been reported within the Exploration & Production segment. Following the 100% divestment of Stogit to Snam Rete Gas that was approved by Eni’s Board of Directors and is expected to close by mid 2009 (for details on this deal see "Significant Business and Portfolio Developments" above), from 2009 the results of the storage business conducted in Italy will be reported within the Gas & Power segment, under the "Regulated Business".

In 2008 operating profit reported by the natural gas storage business was euro 183 million down euro 83 million or 31.2% from 2007.

 


(3)Two of these are not yet operational.

49


Gas & Power

Eni’s Gas & Power segment engages in supply, transport, distribution, storage, re-gasification and marketing of natural gas, as well as ofelectricity and LNG. This segment also includes the activity of power generation that enables Eniis ancillary to extract further value from gas, diversifying its commercial outlets.the marketing of electricity.

52


In the context of a changed demand outlook and stronger competitive pressures both on the European and Italian markets, Eni’s strategy in its Gas & Power segment is to growaims at: (i) increasing international sales also leveraging onwith the Distrigas acquisition, preservesupport of the integration of Distrigas; (ii) maintaining market share and profitability of Italian gas marketing operations, increaseoperations; and (iii) increasing operational efficiency and effectiveness mainly in the marketing, in the regulated businesses (i.e., Italian transport, distribution and distributionstorage activities) and power generations activities.

In 2009, the market environment was extremely difficult and the outlook for 2010 remains uncertain. Demand is slowly recovering from the huge contraction registred in 2009 as a severe economic downturn caused lower consumption, in particular in the power generation and industrial sectors. Assuming normal seasonal effects, European gas demand in 2009 declined by 7.4% from 2008 and the Italian market contracted by approximately 9 BCM from 2008, down 10%, and developalmost 10 BCM from the pre-crisis levels of 2007, down 12%.

In a globalperiod of lower demand, new gas supplies entered the market as several operators, including Eni, completed plans to upgrade gas import pipelines from gas producing countries or to build new facilities to import gas to Europe. In particular, Eni finalized plans to upgrade the import capacity of its two main pipelines from Russia and Algeria (the gas pipelines TAG and TTPC) by 13 BCM/y with new capacity entirely sold to third parties. A new LNG business.

Eni has revised downterminal with a capacity of 8 BCM/y commenced operations late in 2009, operated by a consortium of competitors. A situation of oversupply emerged from those trends. This situation was exacerbated by increased availability of LNG on the marketplace as the main market for LNG, the U.S., reduced its long-term expectations for gas demand growthdependence on LNG imports due to greater production of gas from non-conventional sources. Large gas availability at the European hubs drove down spot prices which fell below the level of gas prices based on oil-linked formulas. Considering that a number of projects have been announced or sanctioned by Eni’s competitors in order to further expand gas import capacity to Europe, management believes that the situation of oversupply will persist for some time which will continue to resulting in price and margin pressures.

Additionally, ongoing patterns towards energy preservation and rising competition from renewable or alternative sources of energy will further dampen recovery perspectives of gas demand. Specifically, at the March 2007 European Council, the European Heads of Government decided to adopt the Climate Action and Renewable Energy Package. This legislation was voted on by the European Parliament in December 2008. The package includes a commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 20% by 2020 from emission levels recorded in 1990 (the target being 30% if an international agreement is reached), as well as a 20% improvement in energy efficiency within the EU Member States by 2020 and a 20% increase in renewable energy by 2020.

The combined impact of all these trends will weigh on the perspectives of a rapid demand recovery. Based on current economic downturnassumptions and its ongoing perception of market trends, management expects that is reducingthe gas market will recover the consumption in all industrial segments and in power generation. In Europe, Eni expects gaslevels of 2008 by 2013. Beyond 2013, management forecasts that demand to remain substantially stable during 2009 and towill resume growing at an average annual rate of 2% inas gas is the following years till 2020, reaching an amount of 722 BCM. The main long-term driver of growth in European demand will be the widercleanest fossil fuel due to its higher environmental compatibility as compared to other fossil fuels, widespread use of gas in power generation. A growing portiongeneration and economic and demographic development.

In consideration of a changed demand outlook, management has decreased its long-term projections of European gas requirementsdemand growth from a previous compound average growth rate (c.a.g.r.) of 2% until 2020 to a revised 1.5% c.a.g.r. These assumptions imply an overall consumption level of approximately 600 BCM by 2020 compared to a previous forecast of 720 BCM. Management also expects the Italian market to grow less than anticipated at an annual rate that will be slightly lower than 2%, implying a level of consumption amounting to 94 BCM versus a previous forecast of 107 BCM by 2020. Considering that the European internal production of natural gas is declining, Europe will be increasingly dependent on gas imports. In such a scenario, Eni’s long-term supply contracts and access to transport infrastructures will a remain competitive advantage.

For more detailed information about this topic and risks associated with those obligations, see "Item 3 – Risk Factors", "Item 5 – Contractual Obligations" and "Item 5 – Management expectations".

In spite of an unfavorable trading environment and weak demand outlook, management intends to drive sales growth and support marketing margins. Planned actions are targeted to expand sales volumes and revenues in the European markets where the Company’s presence is well established and market opportunities are being created. Those markets will include France, Germany, the Benelux countries and continental hubs in North Europe. Management plans to achieve sales volumes in Europe (excluding Italy) of approximately 59 BCM by 2013, with an annual growth rate of 6% from 2009 when sales in European markets amounted to 47 BCM (this amount comprises 44.97 BCM of sales of the Gas & Power segment and approximately 2 BCM of the Exploration & Production segment). The drivers of this growth are expected to be satisfied by imports via pipeline. According to Eni’s estimates, European gas imports will cover at least 80% of consumption from the current level of 60%, due to domestic production decrease, stressing European dependence on producing countries. The most important pipeline supply sources will remain Russia and Algeria and, to a lesser degree, Norway and Libya. Eni expects that LNG supplies will contribute to diversify sources of supply.

In 2008, natural gas demand in Italy amounted to 84.88 BCM representing a small decline from 2007 due to the economic slowdown; approximately 90% of gas requirements were met through imports and 10% was covered by domestic production. The outlook for the Italian demand is more challenging as demand is expected to shrink in 2009 and to post a moderate recovery in subsequent years. Over the long-term, the Company expects Italian gas demand to increase at an average growth rate of approximately 2% through 2020, reaching an amount of 106.7 BCM in 2020 (gas volumes are projected at 94.2 BCM in 2012), driven by rising consumption in the power generation sector. Growing gas needs will be met by a projected increase in import capacity, which will be supported by significant capital expenditure projects designed to upgrade existing infrastructures and to build new ones, including new LNG terminals. The Company expects additional import capacity to supply up to 10 BCM in 2009 as Eni’s upgrades of its main TTPC and TAG pipelines from Algeria and Russia respectively reach full operations. In addition, Eni is completing another leg of expansion at the TAG pipeline and is planning to upgrade its pipeline from Libya. A competitor has commenced commissioning operations at a new LNG terminal in the Adriatic Sea. Overall the Company expects that import capacity will increase by 25 BCM by 2012 of which 90% available by 2010.

Against this backdrop, management plans to increase international natural gas sales leveraging on the integration of and expected synergies from the Distrigas acquisition as well asactivities, Eni’s competitive advantages ensured by gas availability under long-term supply contracts and equity gas, also including benefits associated with contract re-negotiations, access to infrastructures, long-term relationships with key producing countries (mainly Russia, Algeria and Libya), market knowledge, a widespread commercial sale force and a widediversified portfolio of clients. Eni intends to strengthen its positioning in European markets where its presence is already established – such as the Iberian Peninsula, Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Benelux and Turkey – and to develop its marketing activities internationally, particularly in the U.S. leveraging on the planned expansion of the Company’s LNG business.

In Italy, in an increasingly competitive market, Eni sales volumes are projected to decline from the 53 BCM level achieved in 2008 to approximately 50 BCM in 2012. The Companymanagement intends to preserve profitability against the profitabilitybackdrop of its marketing operationsa weak demand outlook and increased competition by leveraging on cost controls and a number of marketing initiatives designed:designed to enhance the Company’s gas

53


offer, by: (i) to focusdiversifying the most profitable customer segments; (ii) to upgrade the commercial offer by tailoringin terms of combinations of pricing and services designed to better suit different customers’ specific needs; (ii) implementing a market approach tailored on local conditions; (iii) increasing capillarity through wide sale-force presence; and (iii) to develop(iv) developing the combined offer of gas and power ("(“dual offer"offer”). A strong focus will be devoted to reducing generaldrive sales to both business and selling expenses.retail customers.

In the medium-term,Overall, Eni plans to increase worldwide gas sales targeting a volume of 124118 BCM by 2012, leveraging on expected growth in international sales that are projected to achieve2013 with an average annual growth rate higher than 3% in the 2010-2013 period.

The achievement of increasesales and margin targets in both European markets and the Italian market will be supported by the impact of 7%recent renegotiations of the Company’s long-term supply contracts with producers. The Company also expects that renegotiations will enable it to gain more operational flexibility in fulfilling contractual obligations with respect to off-taking minimum annual quantities. See discussion on the Company’s take-or-pay contracts below.

Management plans to strongly focus on cost control as a way to improve marketing margins. The action on costs will include a planned reduction in the cost to serve residential clients and uponoptimizing operating and maintenance costs in power generation.

In the regulated businesses in Italy, management plans to deliver steady profitability as new investments will come on line benefiting from guaranteed returns from the Italian Authority for Electricity and Gas, as well as operating synergies deriving from the Distrigas acquisition.integration of all regulated Italian businesses in a single entity.

Over the medium term management intends to sustain the Company’s actions by a disciplined capital expenditure plan focused in particular on the regulated businesses in Italy. Specifically, in the next four-year period Eni plans to invest approximately euro 8.3 billion in the Gas & Power segment of which euro 6.4 billion will mainly be devoted to: (i) expanding and upgrading transport networks in order to match the requirements of additional flexibility and security of the system. More than 80% of the total transport capital expenditures will continue to receive a 2% or 3% premium on the base allowed return; (ii) upgrading storage regulated capacity, both through the development of new fields and the expansion of existing capacity; and (iii) upgrading and developing local distribution networks. In addition, management plans to invest the remaining euro 1.8 billion capital expenditures in marketing activities by completing power plant upgrading and increasing generation flexibility (euro 0.7 billion), as well as in international marketing activities (euro 1.1 billion), including a storage project in the Hewett area off the British coast, to sustain growth in European markets.

The matters regarding future natural gas demand and sales target discussed in this section and elsewhere here inherein are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those in such forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties relating to future natural gas demand include changes in underlying economic factors, changes in regulation, population growth or shrinkage, changes in the relative mix of demand for natural gas and its principal competing fuels, and unexpected developments in the markets for natural gas and its principal competing fuels.

50


Supply of natural gas

In 20082009, Eni’s consolidated subsidiaries including Distrigas’ share amounting to 5.15 BCM, supplied 89.6588.65 BCM of natural gas, with a 5.85decrease of 1 BCM, increaseor 1.1%, from 2007, up 7%. Excluding2008, due to declining gas demand whose impact was partly offset by the contributionfull consolidation of Distrigas, gasDistrigas.

Gas volumes supplied outside Italy (76.50(81.79 BCM from consolidated companies), imported in Italy or sold outside Italy, represented 91% of total supplies, with an increase of 1.350.14 BCM, or 0.2%, from 2007, or 1.8%,2008, mainly due to the growth registered on Europeanfull contribution of Distrigas, whose main sources of supplies are long-term contracts with Norway, the Netherlands and Qatar via LNG, as well as spot markets in particularWestern Europe. As a result, in the first months of the year, with2009 higher volumes purchased:were purchased from: (i) from Algeria via pipelineNorway (up 1.075.68 BCM); (ii) from LibyaQatar (up 0.632.20 BCM) in line with the growth of gas equity production;; and (iii) from the Netherlands (up 0.361.90 BCM).

Due to market trends, in particular a weak demand environment in Italy, the Gas & Power segment reduced its gas purchases from: (i) Algeria (down 5.40 BCM) which was also impacted by damage incurred to the TMPC pipeline in late December 2008; (ii) Libya (down 0.73 BCM); (iv) fromand (iii) Russia, where the Company reduced its off-takes by 2.75 BCM directed mainly to Turkey (up 0.31 BCM) in line withItaly. In addition, the increased gas demand on the Turkish market. Supplies in Italy (8 BCM) declined by 0.65 BCM from 2007, or 7.5%, due to lower domestic production. Supplies of Russian gas for the Italian market declined by 0.97 BCM mainly due toreduction reflected the implementation of agreements with Gazprom providing for Gazprom’swhich provided their entrance ininto the supplies market of supplies to Italian importers andwhereby Eni agreed to reduce its off-takes. This line item also includes volumes purchased to be resold on the corresponding reductionHungarian market.

Supplies in Eni offtakes.Italy (6.86 BCM) declined by 1.14 BCM from 2008, or 14.3%, due to lower domestic production.

In 2008,2009, main gas volumes from equity production derived from: (i) Italian gas fields (7.5(6.5 BCM); (ii) the Wafa and Bahr Essalam fields in Libya linked to Italy through the GreenStream pipeline. In 20082009 these two fields supplied 3.22.5 BCM net to Eni; (iii) certain Eni’sEni fields located in the British and Norwegian sections of the North Sea (2.3 (2.9

54


BCM); and (iv) other European areas (in particular Croatia with 0.60.8 BCM). Considering also the direct sales of the Exploration & Production division in Europe and in the Gulf of Mexico and LNG supplied from the Bonny liquefaction plant in Nigeria, supplied gas volumes from equity production were approximately 2120.7 BCM representing 21%20% of total volumes available for sale.

In 2008, net input of natural gas2009, volumes tofrom storage deposits owned by Eni’s subsidiary Stoccaggi Gas were 0.08Italia increased to 1.25 BCM compared to net input of natural gas volumes uplifted from storage of 1.490.08 BCM in 2007.2008.

The table below sets forth Eni’s purchases of natural gas by source for the periods indicated.

Natural gas supply 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
(BCM)
Italy 

10.21

  

8.65

  

8.00

 
Outside Italy 

79.06

  

75.15

  

81.65

 
Russia 

24.98

  

23.44

  

22.91

 
Algeria (including LNG) 

20.42

  

18.41

  

19.22

 
Libya 

7.70

  

9.24

  

9.87

 
the Netherlands 

10.28

  

7.74

  

9.83

 
Norway 

5.92

  

5.78

  

6.97

 
the United Kingdom 

2.50

  

3.15

  

3.12

 
Hungary 

3.28

  

2.87

  

2.84

 
Qatar (LNG) 

-

  

-

  

0.71

 
Other supplies of natural gas 

2.41

  

2.2

  

4.07

 
Other supplies of LNG 

1.57

  

2.32

  

2.11

 
Total supplies of subsidiaries 

89.27

  

83.80

  

89.65

 
Withdrawals from (input to) storage 

(3.01

)

 

1.49

  

(0.08

)

Network losses and measurement differences 

(0.50

)

 

(0.46

)

 

(0.25

)

Volumes available for sale of Eni's subsidiaries 

85.76

  

84.83

  

89.32

 
Volumes available for sale of Eni's affiliates 

7.65

  

8.74

  

8.91

 
E&P volumes 

4.69

  

5.39

  

6.00

 
Total volumes available for sale 

98.10

  

98.96

  

104.23

 
Natural gas supply 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
  


(BCM)

Italy 8.65  8.00  6.86 
Outside Italy 75.15  81.65  81.79 
Russia 23.44  22.91  22.02 
Algeria (including LNG) 18.41  19.22  13.82 
Libya 9.24  9.87  9.14 
the Netherlands 7.74  9.83  11.73 
Norway 5.78  6.97  12.65 
the United Kingdom 3.15  3.12  3.06 
Hungary 2.87  2.84  0.63 
Qatar (LNG) -  0.71  2.91 
Other supplies of natural gas 2.20  4.07  4.49 
Other supplies of LNG 2.32  2.11  1.34 
Total supplies of subsidiaries 83.80  89.65  88.65 
Withdrawals from (input to) storage 1.49  (0.08) 1.25 
Network losses, measurement differences and other changes (0.46) (0.25) (0.30)
Volumes available for sale of Eni’s subsidiaries 84.83  89.32  89.60 
Volumes available for sale of Eni’s affiliates 8.74  8.91  7.95 
E&P volumes 5.39  6.00  6.17 
  

 

 

Total volumes available for sale 98.96  104.23  103.72 
  

 

 

In order to meet the medium andsecure long-term demand for naturalaccess to gas availability, in particular in view of supplying the Italian gas market, Eni entered intothe Company has signed a number of long-term purchasegas supply contracts with the key producing countries. Thecountries that supply the European gas markets. These contracts will ensure approximately 62.4 BCM of gas availability in 2010 (excluding the contribution of other subsidiaries and associates) with a residual average life of the Company’s supply portfolio currently amounts to approximately 21 years. Such contracts, which generally contain20 years, and provide take-or-pay clauses will ensure a totalwhereby the Company is required to collect minimum predetermined volumes of approximately 62.4 BCM/y of natural gas by 2010.

The finalizationin each year of the purchasecontractual term or, in case of failure, to pay the whole price, or a fraction of it, of uncollected volumes up to the minimum contractual quantity. The take-or-pay clause entitles the Company to collect pre-paid volumes of gas in later years during the period of contract execution. Amounts of cash pre-payments and time schedules for collecting pre-paid gas vary from contract to contract. Generally speaking, cash pre-payments are calculated on the basis of the Belgian company Distrigas (for details onenergy prices current in the year of non-fulfillment with the balance due in the year when the gas is actually collected. Amounts of pre-payments range from 10 to 100 percent of the full price. The right to collect pre-paid gas expires within a ten-year term in some contracts or remains in place until contract expiration in other arrangements. In addition, rights to collect pre-paid gas in future years can be exercised provided that the Company has fulfilled its minimum take obligation in a given year and within the limit of the maximum annual quantity that can be collected in each contractual year. In this deal see "Significant Business and Portfolio Developments" above) has entailed significant expansion of Eni’s supply portfolio with an addition of long-term supplies of approximately 14.7 BCM (Norway, the Netherlands and Qatar) having a residual average life of about 14 years. Eni’s supply portfolio will be more diversified and less risky, ascase, Eni will depend from one single supplier for about 20-22%pay the residual price calculating it as the percentage that complements 100, based on the arithmetical average of total projected suppliesmonthly base prices in 2012.place in the year of the off-take. Similar considerations apply to ship-or-pay contractual obligations.

Despite the fact that an increasing portion of natural gas volumes is planned to be sold outside Italy, managementManagement believes that in the long-term unfavorable trends in the Italian naturalcurrent outlook for gas demand and supply, also due tolarge gas availability on the increase in import capacity (pipeline upgrading and new LNG plants) that took place in 2008 and the

51


finalization of projects in progress or publicly announced by Eni and third parties,marketplace, as well as the possible evolution of Italian regulations in the natural gas sector,sector-specific regulation, represent riskrisks factors to the fulfillment of Eni’sCompany’s ability to fulfill its minimum take obligations in connectionassociated with its long-term supply contracts. In 2009, Eni collected lower volumes than its minimum take due to an unfavorable demand environment. As a result, the Company deferred the relevant purchase costs to future periods by recognizing a non-current asset in the consolidated balance sheet. The non-current asset was recorded against a trade payable for an amount of euro 255 million based on the contractual purchase price formula provided in the relevant contractual arrangements and the contractual percentage of advance, as aligned to their net realizable value as of year end. The Company expects to collect the underlying gas volumes over a period longer than the next twelve months.

Management believes that over the next two years the Company will experience failure in fulfilling its take-or-pay obligations associated with significant volumes of gas, unless demand fundamentals improve substantially and a

55


better balance between demand and supply is achieved in the marketplace. Currently, the Company is unable to forecast the timing of such a recovery.

However, based on management’s projections for sales volumes and prices for the four-year plan and subsequent years, volumes for which an obligation to pay cash advances might arise due to take or pay clauses, will be off-taken within contractual terms, thus recovering cash advances. Even if financing associated with cash advances are factored in, the net present value associated with those long-tem contracts discounted at the weighted average cost of capital for the Gas & Power segment still remains positive and consequently those contracts do not fall within the category of an onerous contract as prescribed by IAS 37. The assessment of the Company’s take-or-pay supply contracts. Seecontracts also considered the impact of contract renegotiations that have recently been finalized or are progressing whereby the Company has improved both its purchase costs and operational flexibility.

For more detailed information about this topic and risks associated with those obligations, see "Item 3 – Risk Factors" and "Item 5 – Contractual Obligations".

In 2008, Eni purchases under its take-or-pay contracts were higher than its minimum uplift obligation. This amount relates mainly to a contractual year, rather than a calendar year (from October to end of September for a sizeable part of Eni Gas & Power long-term supply contracts).

 

Marketing

Natural Gas Sales for the Year 20082009

In 2008,2009, worldwide natural gas sales of 104.23103.72 BCM, including own consumption, sales by affiliates and E&P sales in Europe and in the Gulf of Mexico, increased by 5.3%declined slightly from 20072008 (down 0.51 BCM, or 0.5%) mainly due to the negative effects of sharply lower gas demand in Italy (down 10%) and Europe (down 7.4% both percentages net of seasonal swings). These decreases were partially offset by the contribution of the Distrigas acquisition (up 12.02 BCM) and the organic growth recorded in the European markets (up 9%) and the contribution of the acquisition of Distrigas as well as higher seasonal sales recorded in the first quarter. These positives were partly offset by the lower performance of the Italian market (down 5.8%).markets.

Natural gas sales in Italy were 52.8740.04 BCM (including own consumption)consumption and declinedsales by 3.26affiliates) a decline of 12.83 BCM from 2007,2008, or 5.8%24.3%.

The Italian market includes large businesses, power generation users, wholesalers, middle-sized enterprises and service and residential customers; they are further grouped as follows: (i) large industrial clients and power generation utilities, directly linked to the national and the regional natural gas transport networks; (ii) wholesalers, mainly local selling companies which resell natural gas to residential customers through low pressure distribution networks and distributors of natural gas for automotive use; and (iii) residential customers, that include households (also referred to as the retail market), the tertiary sector (mainly commercial outlets, hospitals, schools and local administrations) and middle-sized enterprises (also referred to as the middle market) located in large metropolitan areas and urban centers.

As of December 31, 2008, Eni clients amounted to 6.63 million units.2009, Eni’s customers in Italy were 6.88 million.

In 2008, the decline inItaly, sales on the Italian gas market was primarily duevolumes decreased by 12.83 BCM, or 24.3%, to wholesalers40.04 BCM reflecting sharply lower supplies to power generation utilities (down 2.498.01 BCM) and, industrial customers (down 2.132.01 BCM) mainly reflectingand wholesalers (down 1.60 BCM) dragged down by a decline in industrial production following the impact of lower gas demandeconomic downturn and competitive pressures. The decreasepressures, especially in the last part of the year which was partly offsetaffected by higher suppliesnew gas availability. Volumes sold to the power generationresidential sector (up 0.48 BCM) and higher seasonal sales to residential customers (up 0.43 BCM)increased slightly due to colder weatherhigher weather-related sales, particularly in the first quarter. The decline in salesand fourth quarter of 2009 and higher volumes destined to wholesalers and industrial customers also reflects the increase in sales under the gas release programs (3.28 BCM, up 0.91 BCM from 2007). These sales related to certain proceedings settled between Eni and the Italian Antitrust Authority. In June 2004, Eni agreed with the Antitrust Authority to sell a total volume of 9.2 BCM of natural gas (2.3 BCM/y) in the four thermal years from October 1, 2004 to September 30, 2008 at the Tarvisio entry point into the Italian network. In March 2007 a new gas release program was signed for volumes amounting to 4 BCM of natural gas to sell in the two thermal years from October 1, 2007 to September 30, 2009 at a virtual exchange point in the Italian market.Eni’s power generation business.

Sales to importers in Italy (11.25(10.48 BCM) increaseddecreased by 0.580.77 BCM, up 5.4%, as a larger portion of these sales in 2007 was replaced with direct sales in Italy.or 6.8%.

Gas sales in European markets (31.78(44.97 BCM including affiliates and the contribution of Distrigas acquisition) increased by 7.4313.19 BCM, or 30.5%41.5%, benefiting from the contribution of Distrigas (up 12.02 BCM) and also reflecting market share gains. Excluding the impact of Distrigas, sales of natural gas on European markets amounted to 26.5527.72 BCM, increasing by 2.201.17 BCM, or 9%4.4%, mainly due to the growth registered in: (i) France (up 0.641.27 BCM) dueand in Northern Europe (up 1.10 BCM). These increases were offset in part by lower volumes reported in supplies to marketing initiatives targeting wholesalers and industrial customers; (ii)importers in Italy (down 0.77 BCM), in the Iberian Peninsula (up 0.53(down 0.63 BCM) due to higher supplies to wholesalers and the power generation segment; (iii) Turkey (up 0.31Hungary (down 0.24 BCM), due to the progressive reaching as a result of full operations of the Blue Stream pipeline; and (iv) Germany-Austria (up 0.20 BCM) due to higher sales to wholesalers. decreased demand.

Sales to markets outside Europe (2.33(2.06 BCM) are substantially in line with 2007.decreased by 0.27 BCM from 2008.

E&P sales in Europe and in the United States increased by 0.610.17 BCM, up 11.3%, as a result in particular of the production ramp-up in the Gulf of Mexico.or 2.8%.

5256


The tables below set forth Eni’s sales of natural gas by principal market for the periods indicated.

Natural gas sales by entities 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
(BCM)
Total sales of subsidiaries 85.76 84.83 89.32
Italy 57.07 56.08 52.82
Rest of Europe 27.93 27.86 35.61
Outside Europe 0.76 0.89 0.89
Total sales of Eni's affiliates (Eni's share) 7.65 8.74 8.91
Italy 0.02 0.05 0.05
Rest of Europe 6.88 7.16 7.42
Outside Europe 0.75 1.53 1.44
Total sales of G&P 93.41 93.57 98.23
E&P in Europe and in the Gulf of Mexico (a) 4.69 5.39 6.00
Worldwide gas sales 98.10 98.96 104.23
Natural gas sales by entities 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
  


(BCM)

Total sales of subsidiaries 84.83 89.32 89.60
Italy (including own consumption) 56.08 52.82 40.04
Rest of Europe 27.86 35.61 48.65
Outside Europe 0.89 0.89 0.91
Total sales of Eni’s affiliates (Eni’s share) 8.74 8.91 7.95
Italy 0.05 0.05 -
Rest of Europe 7.16 7.42 6.80
Outside Europe 1.53 1.44 1.15
Total sales of G&P 93.57 98.23 97.55
E&P in Europe and in the Gulf of Mexico (a) 5.39 6.00 6.17
Worldwide gas sales 98.96 104.23 103.72
  
 
 

(a)iE&P sales include volumes marketed by the Exploration & Production division in Europe (4.07, 3.59,(3.59, 3.36 and 2.57 BCM in 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2008,2009, respectively) and in the Gulf of Mexico (0.62, 1.8(1.80, 2.64 and 2.643.60 BCM in 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2008,2009, respectively).

 

Natural gas sales by market 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
(BCM)
ITALY 57.09 56.13 52.87
Wholesalers 11.54 10.01 7.52
Gas release 2.00 2.37 3.28
Italian gas exchange and spot markets - 1.90 1.89
Industries 14.33 12.77 10.64
Industries 13.33 11.77 9.59
Medium-sized enterprises and services 1.00 1.00 1.05
Power generation 16.67��17.21 17.69
Residential 6.42 5.79 6.22
Own consumption 6.13 6.08 5.63
INTERNATIONAL SALES 41.01 42.83 51.36
Importers in Italy 14.10 10.67 11.25
European markets 20.71 24.35 31.78
Iberian Peninsula 5.24 6.91 7.44
Germany-Austria 4.72 5.03 5.29
Turkey 3.68 4.62 4.93
Belgium - - 4.57
Northern Europe 2.62 3.15 3.21
Hungary 3.10 2.74 2.82
France 1.07 1.62 2.66
Other 0.28 0.28 0.86
Extra European markets 1.51 2.42 2.33
E&P in Europe and in the Gulf of Mexico 4.69 5.39 6.00
WORLDWIDE GAS SALES 98.10 98.96 104.23
Natural gas sales by market 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
  

(BCM)

ITALY 56.13 52.87 40.04
Wholesalers 10.01 7.52 5.92
Gas release 2.37 3.28 1.30
Italian gas exchange and spot markets 1.90 1.89 2.37
Industries 11.77 9.59 7.58
Medium-sized enterprises and services 1.00 1.05 1.08
Power generation 17.21 17.69 9.68
Residential 5.79 6.22 6.30
Own consumption 6.08 5.63 5.81
INTERNATIONAL SALES 42.83 51.36 63.68
Rest of Europe 35.02 43.03 55.45
Importers in Italy 10.67 11.25 10.48
European markets 24.35 31.78 44.97
Iberian Peninsula 6.91 7.44 6.81
Germany-Austria 5.03 5.29 5.36
Belgium - 4.57 14.86
Hungary 2.74 2.82 2.58
Northern Europe 3.15 3.21 4.31
Turkey 4.62 4.93 4.79
France 1.62 2.66 4.91
Other 0.28 0.86 1.35
Extra European markets 2.42 2.33 2.06
E&P in Europe and in the Gulf of Mexico 5.39 6.00 6.17
WORLDWIDE GAS SALES 98.96 104.23 103.72
  
 
 

Marketing of Electricity

As part of its marketing activities in Italy, Eni engages in selling electricity on the Italian market mainly on the open market, at industrial sites and on the Italian Exchange for electricity. Supplies of electricity include both own production volumes through gas-fired, combined-cycles facilities and purchases on the open market. This activity has been developed in order to capture further value along the gas value-chain leveraging on the Company’s large gas availability. In addition, with the aim of developing and retaining valuable customers in the residential space and middle to large industrial users, the Company has been developing a commercial offer that provides the combined supply of gas and power. In 2009, the program for expanding the combined integrated offer of gas and power progressed in accordance with the Company’s expansion plans.

57


Notwithstanding weaker domestic demand, in 2009 sales of power amounted to 33.96 TWh, an increase of 4.03 TWh, or 13.5%, from 2008, also as a result of leveraging the dual-offer penetration. The increase mainly related to: (i) higher sales on open markets, in particular the retail market, with an increased number of clients served following intensive marketing campaigns, and to wholesalers due to the start of VPP (Virtual Power Plant) supply agreements signed at the end of 2008. Sales to large clients, on the other hand declined due to a reduction in the customer base and the impact of the economic downturn; and (ii) higher volumes traded on the Italian power exchange (up 0.88 TWh, or 23%).

Sales of power were directed to the free market (73%), the Italian power exchange (14%), industrial sites (9%) and others (4%).

Power availability 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
 

(TWh)

Power generation sold 25.49 23.33 24.09
Trading of electricity (a) 7.70 6.60 9.87
  
 
 
  33.19 29.93 33.96
  
 
 
Power sales by market      
Free market 20.73 22.89 24.74
Italian Exchange for electricity 8.66 3.82 4.70
Industrial plants 2.81 2.71 2.92
Other (a) 0.99 0.51 1.60
  
 
 
  33.19 29.93 33.96
  
 
 

(a) 
Include positive and negative imbalances.

Planned Actions and Sales Target

In the medium-term, Eni plans to increase its sales volumes of natural gas in international markets, mainly in Europe and the U.S., in order to compensate for lower growth opportunities on its domestic market due to sector-specific regulation imposing limits to the size of Italian gas operators. In order to achieve its growth targets, Eni will leverage on its strengths represented by gas availability both as equity gas and under long-term purchase contracts, operational flexibility ensured by access to a large transport network, regasification terminals and logistic assets, a large portfolio of clients and market knowledge. Eni expects to increase international sales also leveraging on synergies deriving from the Distrigas acquisition that will help drive sales growth and markets share gains in Eni’s target markets in spite of an unfavorable short-term outlook for European gas demand.

53


(i) Italy

InOver the medium-term, management expects that the Italian gas market will be characterizedexperience by weak growth and greater competition related to the short-term decline in demand resulting fromas a result of the economic slowdown and the entry on the market of new supplies related to the upgrade of import infrastructure. In particular import capacity is expected to increase by approximately 25 BCM ininfrastructures and the next four years. About 90%coming on stream of new capacity is expectedLNG facilities. Adding further to come on stream in 2010. This capacity derives in particular from the upgrades achieved by Eni on pipelines from Russia (TAG), Algeria (TTPC) and Libya (GreenStream) andrisk of oversupply, certain competitors have recently announced plans to build new import facilities targeting the full operation of the re-gasification plant of Rovigo owned by third parties.longer-term.

In order to support sales volumes and profitability of its marketing operations in Italy, Eni intends to implement an effective marketing policy, intendedsetting up new offer structures that fully match the diversified requirements of Eni’s customers, especially for the business segments. In the retail market Eni plans to deliver value to customersadopt an approach tailored on local specific conditions, leveraging on the qualitycapillarity of the service and the offer of customized price formulas. Eni’s marketing initiatives will focus on all segments in particular the middle and retail markets, also leveraging on the expected development of theits commercial presence. The combined offer of gas and power (dual offer) is expected to residential customers ("dual offer").drive sales growth to both business and retail customers. Large industrial clients will be retained based on selective marketing policies targeting the most valuable and profitable.profitable ones. Volumes sold to thermoelectric utilities will be supported in orderare expected to maintainremain at current levels.

At the same time, Eni expects significant margin pressures due to preserve its sellingthe impact of increasing competition and actions from competitors intended to gain market share. Management is focused on preserving gas margins by means of tight cost control. Cost efficiencies are expected to derive from reducing the cost to serve leveraging on technological innovation, streamlining front-end and back-end processes and achieving economies of scale and synergies, particularly those drivingderiving from the dual offer in terms of process integration for acquiring, retaining and managinghandling customers.

As part of its marketing activities in Italy, Eni engages Management also expects that the Company’s supply costs for raw material will be more aligned with current market conditions as the Company has renegotiated or is in the marketingprocess of power. Particularly, the Company offers torenegotiating its retail clients a commercial offer that provides the combinedmain long-term supply of gas and power ("the dual offer"). Eni plans to achieve by 2012 a penetration rate of over 20% of Eni’s retail customer base.contracts.

In 2008, sales of power amounted to 29.93 TWh and decreased by 3.26 TWh from 2007, down 9.8%, reflecting lower traded volumes as the economic activity declined in the last part of the year. The decrease mainly regarded sales to the power exchange. Sales on the free market to wholesalers increased due to higher spot sales, and so did sales to industrial users due to new customers acquired. Sales of power amounting to 29.93 TWh were directed to the free market (76%), the power exchange (13%), industrial sites (9%) and Electricity Service Operator (2%). In 2008, the program for expanding the combined integrated offer of gas and power (dual offer) progressed in accordance with the Company’s expansion plans.58

  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
(TWh)
Power generation 24.82 25.49 23.33
Trading of electricity 6.21 7.70 6.60
  31.03 33.19 29.93
Power sales by market      
Free market 16.22 20.73 22.89
Italian Exchange for electricity 9.67 8.66 3.82
Industrial plants 2.70 2.81 2.71
Electricity Service operator (ESO) 2.44 0.99 0.51
  31.03 33.19 29.93



Power availability to Eni is ensured by internal production (see the generation business below) and purchases on the free market. In 2008, production availability covered 78% of sales volumes.

(ii) European Markets

In the future, Eni intends to strengthen its leadershippresence in the European gas markets, targeting to increase both sale volumes and market shares. By implementing this growth strategy, the Company intends to make for lower growth prospects on the Italian market. A review of Eni’s presence in the key European markets and volume targets for 2012 is presented below.

Benelux.The acquisition ofintegration with Distrigas finalized in October 2008 granted Eni a solid base from which to develop itsstrong presence in the gas market of the Benelux countries (Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg). and a significant exposure to spot markets in Western Europe. Distrigas is a key operator in Benelux, in particularparticularly in Belgium, the strategic hub of the continental European gas market thanks to its central position and high level of interconnectivity with the transit gas networks of centralCentral and northernNorthern Europe. The company sells natural gas mainly to industries, wholesalers and power generation. In 2009, Distrigas alsosales amounted to 15.72 BCM. Distrigas has diversified sources of supply both in geographical terms with its long-term supply contracts portfolio infrom the Netherlands, Norway and Qatar, as well as spot markets and technicallyaccess to relevant transport infrastructures. Most importantly, Distrigas’ presence on spot markets ensures a high degree of flexibility as it purchases naturalthe Company is able to dispose of part of its gas transports it via pipelineavailability under long-term contracts whenever market opportunities arise. In 2009, Eni delivered the planned synergies of integrating Distrigas operations by picking revenue opportunities and as LNG. It also owns an

54


11% interestcost optimizations. Over the medium term, Eni plans to achieve further synergies by leveraging on market opportunities associated with Distrigas access to transport infrastructures, its presence in Interconnector UK Ltd, the company that owns the interconnection of the transit gas networks between Belgium and the UK and the Methania gas tanker ship. Its transport assets connect natural gas sources withmain European markets and cost efficiencies to be achieved by integrating commercial operations, including optimization of logistics, reductions in general and administrative costs and back-end expenses. The Company also expects to deliver synergies by optimizing the Zeebrugge hub on the Belgian coast.supply portfolio of Eni and Distrigas.

In 2008 Distrigas natural gas sales in Benelux amounted to approximately 13.5 BCM and by 2012 Eni targets sales of 14.8 BCM, an annual average growth rate of 2% and a 22% market share.

France.Eni sells natural gas to industrial clients, wholesalers and resellers andpower generation as well as to the segments of small businessesbusiness and retail though its partnershipsegments. Eni’s presence consists of direct commercial activities and the partnerships with Altergaz in which it holds a 38.91% stake. Altergaz supplies approximately 23,000 clients (of these 17,000 are residential customers), with revenues of approximately euro 260 million. Eni will support Altergaz’s development in the target segments through a 10-year supply contract of 1.3 BCM/y41.62% interest and will pursue synergies with its own commercial structure. On September 23, 2008, Eni and Altergaz acquired a 17% stake each in the share capital of Gaz de Bordeaux SAS with a 17% interest (and a further 17% interest held by Altergaz). Altergaz supplies approximately 69,000 clients, of which 58,000 are residential customers (23,000 in 2008, of which 17,000 residentials). Eni will benefit from Altergaz’s development plans as Eni already supplies 1.3 BCM/y to its associate. Gaz de Bordeaux engages in selling natural gas distributor in the municipality of Bordeaux and definedBordeaux. Eni plans to develop this partnership.

Furthermore, the terms of a long-term supply contract for 250 mmCM/y to Gaz de Bordeaux.

In addition, the recent acquisition of Distrigas providesintegration with Distrigas’ marketing activities will provide Eni with a customer base and sound commercial structures.

The retail segment in France presents attractive developmentfurther opportunities withto expand its 10.8 million of sites and delivery points and consumption equaling 27% of total national consumption.

Eni expects to ramp sales on the French market to achieve 6.8 BCM of sales by 2012. This target represents an annual average growth rate of 14%. Eni’s market share is expected to reach 13%.in the country.

Germany/Austria.Germany-Austria. Eni is present onin the German natural gas market through its affiliateassociate GVS (Gasversorgung Süddeutschland GmbH - Eni 50%) which sold approximately 4.223.98 BCM in 2008 (2.112009 (1.99 BCM being Eni’s share), and through a direct marketing structure (Eni G&P GmbH). In the medium-term, Eni, supported by the synergies achieved with GVS, plans to significantly increase its sales to the local distribution companies and industrial segment, leveraging on the pursuit of opportunities arising from the ongoing liberalization process. The objective is to sell 7.6which sold in 2009 approximately 2.5 BCM in 2012, equal to a 7% market share with an annual growth rate of 9%.Germany and 0.8 BCM in Austria.

Iberian Peninsula

Portugal. Eni operates on the Portuguese market through its affiliate Galp Energia (Eni’s interest 33.34%) which sold approximately 5.784.34 BCM in 2008 (1.932009 (1.45 BCM being Eni’s share).

Spain. Eni operates in the Spanish gas market through a direct marketing structure that markets in particularits portfolio of LNG from Nigeria and through Unión Fenosa Gas (UFG) (Eni’s interest 50%) which mainly supplies natural gas mainly to final customersindustrial clients, wholesalers and power generation utilities. In 20082009 UFG gas sales of UFG in Europe amounted to 4.324.68 BCM (2.16(2.34 BCM Eni’s share). UFG holds an 80% interest in the Damietta liquefaction plant, on the Egyptian coast (see below), and a 7.36% interest in a liquefaction plant in Oman. In addition, it holds interests in the Sagunto (Valencia) and El Ferrol (Galicia) regasification plants with a 42.5%(42.5% and 18.9% interest, respectively.

, respectively). In 2009 Eni targets to increase its sales in Spain amounted to 5.36 BCM representing a slight decline from a year ago.

Turkey. Eni sells gas supplied from Russia and transported via the Iberian PeninsulaBlue Stream pipeline. In 2009 sales amounted to 4.79 BCM, a decrease of 2.8% from the current 7.44 BCM level to approximately 8.6 BCM by 2012, with an annual average growth rate of 4%, in line with the growth of the Spanish market.a year ago.

UK/Northern Europe. Eni through its subsidiary North Sea Gas & Power (Eni UK Ltd) markets in the UK the equity gas produced at Eni’s fields in the North Sea and operates in the main continental natural gas hubs (NBP, Zeebrugge, TTF).

Projects in the Hewett area. Eni plansis assessing the technical and economic aspects of a project intended to grow volumes sold onbuild an offshore storage facility in the markets ofHewett area (Eni’s interest 89%) located in the UK/ Northern Europe fromSouthern Gas Basin in the current 3.2North Sea, near the Bacton terminal, where certain depleted fields are expected to be converted to gas storage deposits. Peak working gas is estimated at 5.6 BCM level to approximately 6.8 BCM by 2012, with a 21% average annual growth rate.production of approximately 60 mmCM/d. An appraisal well is planned to be drilled shortly, whose outcome will provide further data to confirm those estimates. The storage capacity will support Eni’s production, sales and trading activities in Europe by providing the necessary flexibilityto manage seasonal swings of gas demand in the United Kingdom. The activity of gas storage in the UK is de-regulated and results from this project are expected be reported within the “Marketing business”.

Turkey. Eni sells gas supplied from Russia and transported via the Blue Stream pipeline. In 2008 sales amounted to 4.93 BCM. Leveraging on the59


The project sanction is expected demand growth, Eni plans to increase sales up to 6.4 BCM by 2012, equal to a 7% growth rate.in 2010 with start-up planned in 2015.

 

(iii) The United States

Eni’s plans to expand its natural gas sales in the U.S. are described under the "LNG business" below.

 

The LNG Business

Eni is present in the all phases of LNG:the LNG business: liquefaction, shipping, regasification and sale through operated activities or interests in joint ventures and intendsassociates. Eni’s presence in the business is tied to speed up the development ofCompany’s plans to develop its large gas reserve base in Africa. The LNG business on a global scale, aiming at building or acquiring assetshas been deeply impacted by the economic downturn of 2009 and structural modifications in the LNG value chainU.S. market where large availability of gas from non traditional sources promise to reduce in order to seizeperspective the opportunities arisingcountry’s dependence from the increasing role of LNG in satisfying energy requirements.

55


Expansion of LNG business in particular on extra European markets, mainly in the USA, will enable Eni to fully monetize its large equity reserves.gas imports via LNG.

Eni’s main assets and projects in the LNG business are described below.

Italy.Eni, through Snam Rete Gas, operates the only regasificationre-gasification terminal operating in Italy at Panigaglia (Liguria). At full capacity, this terminal can regasify 17,500 CM of LNG per day and input 3.5 BCM/y into the Italian transport network. Eni plans

Management is planning to increase the capacity ofupgrade the Panigaglia plantterminal capacity from the current 3.5 BCM to 8 BCM. From 2014BCM in the upgrade of this structure will allow to increase imports to Italy by 4.5 BCM/y. In accordance with Management’s revised plans, works are expected to commence by 2011, if all authorizations are granted.future.

Qatar. The closing of the acquisition of Distrigas allowed Eni to increase its development opportunities in the LNG business with the access to new supply sources mainly from Qatar, under a 20-year long agreement with RasGas (owned by Qatar Petroleum with a 70% interest and ExxonMobil with a 30% interest) and to the Zeebrugge LNG terminal on the Western coast of Belgium. In 2008 the terminal was authorized to load gas carriers, allowing Distrigas to start its LNG export activity to very profitable markets.

Egypt.Eni, through its interest in Unión Fenosa Gas, owns a 40% interest in the Damietta liquefaction plant producingwhich produces approximately 5 mmtonnes/y of LNG equalwhich equates to a feedstock of 77.56 BCM/y ofin natural gas. In 2008,2009, the Gas & Power segment withdrew 0.70.96 mmtonnes of LNG (approximately 11.4 BCM of natural gas) to be marketed in Europe.

Spain.Eni through Unión Fenosa Gas holds a 21.25% interest in the Sagunto regasification plant, near Valencia, with a capacity of 6.79.6 BCM/y. At present, Eni’s capacity entitlement amounts to 1.61.9 BCM/y of gas. A capacity upgrading plan has been sanctioned targeting a 0.8 BCM/y capacity increase by 2009.

Eni through Unión Fenosa Gas also holds a 9.5%9.45% interest in the El Ferrol regasification plant, located in Galicia, which started operations in November 2007, with a treatment capacity of approximately 3.64.0 BCM/y, 0.4of which 0.35 BCM/y being Eni’s capacity entitlements.

USA

Cameron. Eni acquired fromIn the U.S. company Sempra a capacity entitlement inthird quarter of 2009, operations started at the Cameron regasificationre-gasification plant under constructionlocated on the banks of the Calcasieu River, approximately 15 miles south of Lake Charles in Louisiana. Eni’s capacity entitlement amountsLouisiana, USA.

In consideration of a changed demand outlook, Eni renegotiated certain terms of the contract with the U.S. company Cameron LNG, relating to 6.5 BCM/y, equal tothe farming out of a 40% share of the total plantregasification capacity. The new agreement provides that Eni will be entitled to a daily send-out of 572,000 mmBTU (approximately 5.7 BCM/y) and a dedicated storage capacity of 160 thousand CM, which will provide Eni more flexibility in managing seasonal swings in gas demand.

Taking into account current conditions of oversupply on the U.S. gas market, Eni rescheduled the Brass project (West Africa) for a duration of 20 years. The validity of the contract is conditional upon the actual start-up of the regasification service, expected by end of 2009. This transaction will allow Eni to market the naturaldeveloping gas reserves that itto fuel the Cameron plant. The start-up is developingnow expected in North Africa and Nigeria on the North American market.2015.

Pascagoula. Within the This project is part of an upstream projectdevelopment related to the construction of an LNG plant in Angola designed to produce 5.2 mmtonnes/ymmtonnes of LNG (approximately 7.3 BCM/y) for the North American market in order to market part of the Company’s gas reserves. As part of the downstream leg of the project, Eni has an optionsigned a 20 year contract with Gulf LNG to purchase a capacity entitlement amounting tobuy 5.8 BCM/y for 20 years atof the regasification capacity of the plant that will be builtunder construction near Pascagoula in Mississippi, with start upMississippi. The expected start-up is by the end of 2011.

With2012 which is in line with the contributionstart-up of the Distrigas acquisition andupstream project in Angola.

60


At the same time Eni Usa Gas Marketing Llc entered a 20-year contract for the purchase of salesapproximately 0.9 BCM/y of regasified gas downstream the E&P segment,terminal owned by 2012 Eni targets sales of LNG of about 17 BCM (12 BCM in 2008).Angola Supply Services, a company whose partners also own Angola LNG.

LNG sales 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
(BCM)
G&P sales 6.4 8.0 8.4
Italy 1.5 1.2 0.3
European markets 4.4 5.6 7.0
Extra european markets 0.5 1.2 1.1
E&P sales 3.5 3.7 3.6
Liquefaction plants:      
Bontang (Indonesia) 0.9 0.7 0.7
Point Fortin (Trinidad & Tobago) 0.4 0.6 0.5
Bonny (Nigeria) 1.8 2.0 2.0
Darwin (Australia) 0.4 0.4 0.4
  9.9 11.7 12.0
LNG sales 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
  


(BCM)

G&P sales 8.0 8.4 9.8
  
 
 
Italy 1.2 0.3 0.1
Rest of Europe 5.6 7.0 8.9
Extra european markets 1.2 1.1 0.8
E&P sales 3.7 3.6 3.1
  
 
 
Liquefaction plants:      
- Bontang (Indonesia) 0.7 0.7 0.8
- Point Fortin (Trinidad & Tobago) 0.6 0.5 0.5
- Bonny (Nigeria) 2.0 2.0 1.4
- Darwin (Australia) 0.4 0.4 0.4
  
 
 
  11.7 12.0 12.9
  
 
 

56


Power Generation

Eni conducts itsEni’s power generation activities at its sites ofare located in Ferrera Erbognone, Ravenna, Livorno, Taranto, Mantova, Brindisi, Ferrara and Ferrara. in Bolgiano, where a new plant was recently acquired.

In 2009, power generation was 24.09 TWh, up 0.76 TWh, or 3.3% from 2008, mainly due to higher production at the Ferrara plant (Eni’s interest 51%), in connection with two new 390 megawatt combined cycle units coming on line.

As of power amounted to 23.33 TWh, down 2.16December 31, 2009, installed operational capacity was 5.3 GW (4.9 GW in 2008).

Power availability in 2009 was supported by the growth in electricity trading activity (up 3.27 TWh from 2007,2008, or 8.5%49.5%) due mainly to higher volumes traded on the Italian power exchange as a decline in sales volumes. Total installed capacity was 4.9 GW at December 31, 2008. Salesresult of steam (10,584 ktonnes) in 2008 decreased by 265 ktonnes from 2007, down 2.4% and were directed to end customers.lower purchase prices.

In the medium-termBy 2013 Eni intends to complete its plan for expanding its power generation capacity, targeting an installed operational capacity of 5.5 GW. 5.4 GW8.

At full capacity in 2012,2013, production is expected to amount to approximately 2926 TWh, corresponding to approximately 8% of power expected to be generated in Italy at that date.

This expansion will allow Eni to consolidate its market share and its position as the third power producer in Italy.

Supplies of natural gas are expected to amount to approximately 5.65.3 BCM/y from Eni’s diversified supply portfolio.

Residual expected capital expenditure amountamounts to euro 0.7 billion in addition to the euro 2.4 billion already invested until 2008. The development plan is2009. Development plans are underway at Taranto (Eni 100%) and Ferrara (Eni’s interest(Eni 51%), where in partnership with EGL Holding Luxembourg (a company belonging to Swiss group EGL) construction of two new 390 MW combined cycle units is currently undergoing testing andas well as at the relevant authorizations are pending with start up expected in early 2009.recently acquired Bolgiano plant (Eni 100%).

New installed generation capacity uses the combined cycle gas fired technology (CCGT), ensuring a high level of efficiency and low environmental impact. In particular, management estimates that for a given amount of energy (electricity and heat) produced, the use ofusing the CCGT technology on a productioninstead of 26.5 TWh reduces emissionsconventional power generation technology, the emission of carbon dioxide reduces by approximately 5 mmtonnes, as compared to emissions using conventional power generation technology.on an energy production of 26.5 TWh. The CCGT technology has been acknowledged by the Authority for Electricity and Gas as a production technology that entails priority on the national dispatching network and the exemption from the purchase of "green certificates". Article 11 of Legislative Decree No. 79/1999 concerning the opening up of the Italian electricity market obliges importers and producers of power from non renewable sources to input into the national power system a share of


(8)Capacity available after completion of dismantling of obsolete plants.

61


power produced from renewable sources set at 2% of power imported or produced from non renewable sources exceeding 100 GW. Calculations are made on total amounts net of co-generation and own consumption. This obligation can be met also by purchasing volumes or rights from other producers employing renewable sources (the so-called green certificates) to cover all or part of such 2% share. Legislative Decree No. 387/2003 established that from 2004 to 2006 the minimum amount of power from renewable sources to be input in the grid in the following year be increased by 0.35% per year. The Minister of Productive Activities, with decrees issued in consent with the Minister of the Environment, will define further increaseshas defined a 0.75% increase of this ratio for the 2007-2009 and 2010-2012 periods.periods from 2007 to 2009.

Eni’s main operated power plants are described below.

Ferrera Erbognone. This power plant has an installed capacity of approximately 1,030 MW divided onbetween three combined cycle units, two of them with anwhich have a capacity of approximately 390 MW capacityand are fired with natural gas, thegas. The third one withunit has capacity of approximately 250 MW capacityand is fired whitwith a mixed fuel containing natural gas and refinery gas obtained from the gasification of a heavy residue formfrom crude processing at the nearby Eni-operated Sannazzaro refinery.

Ravenna.Two new combined cycle units with the capacity of 390 MW unitseach started operations in 2004. AddedAdding to the existing capacity, the power plant’s installed capacity has reached a total of approximately 1,100 MW.

Brindisi.This power plant has been upgraded by installing three new combined cycle units, each with a capacity of 390 MW, increasingwhich has increased the overall capacity atto approximately 1,500 MW.

Mantova.This power plant has been upgraded by installing two new combined cycle units, each with a capacity of 390 MW, increasingwhich has increased the overall capacity atto approximately 900 MW. This power plant also provides steam for heating purposes delivered to the Mantova’sMantova urban network through a heat exchanger.

Livorno. This power plant has an installed capacity of approximately 200 MW, divided onbetween gas and steam turbines with steam generators.

Taranto.The existing power units have a capacity of approximately 75 MW, divided onbetween gas and steam turbines with steam generators.

Ferrara. Two new combined cycle units with the capacity of 390 MW unitseach started operations in 2008. AddedAdding to already existing gas and steam turbines, the power plant’s installed capacity has reached a total of approximately 840 MW.

57Bolgiano. The existing power plant has an installed capacity of approximately 39 MW divided between four gas turbines associated with four super-heated water generators.


Power Generation 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
Purchases        
Natural gas (mmCM) 4,775 4,860 4,530
Other fuels (ktoe) 616 720 560
- of which steam cracking   136 137 131
Production        
Electricity (TWh) 24.82 25.49 23.33
Steam (ktonnes) 10,287 10,849 10,584
Installed generation capacity (GW) 4.9 4.9 4.9



 

Power Generation 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
Purchases        
Natural gas (mmCM) 4,860 4,530 4,790
Other fuels (ktoe) 720 560 569
- of which steam cracking   137 131 82
Production        
Electricity (TWh) 25.49 23.33 24.09
Steam (ktonnes) 10,849 10,584 10,048
Installed generation capacity (GW) 4.9 4.9 5.3
    
 
 

62


Infrastructures

Eni operates a large European network of integrated infrastructure for transporting natural gas, which links key consumption basins with the main producing areas (North Africa, Russia(Russia, Algeria, Libya and the North Sea).

In Italy, Eni operates almost all the lines which form the national transport network, gas underground storage deposits and related facilities, a re-gasification plant in Panigaglia and can count on an extended system of local distribution networks serving retail markets. The availability of regasification capacity in Italy and the Iberian Peninsula coupled with a significant storage capacity ensures a high level of operating flexibility. These assets represent a significant competitive advantage.networks. Eni is implementing plans for upgrading its import pipelines from Russia, Algeria and Libya and its storage capacity, and for expanding and modernizingupgrading its national transport and distribution networks. The Company plans to invest approximately euro 7 billion in the next four years in these businesses to cope with long-term growth expected in the European gas demand.networks and storage capacity.

Transport infrastructure            
Route 

Lines

 

Length of main line

 

Diameter

 

Transport capacity (1)

 

Pressure min-max

 

Compression stations

   
 
 
 
 
 

ITALY

 

(units)

 

(km)

 

(inch)

 

(mmCM/d)

 

(bar)

 

(No.)

Mazara del Vallo-Minerbio (under upgrading) 2/3 1,480 48/42 - 48 101.8 75 7
Tarvisio-Sergnano-Minerbio 3 433 42/36, 34 e 48/56 106.0 58/75 3
Passo Gries-Mortara 2 177 48/34 64.9 55/75 1
             
  

Lines

 

Total length

 

Diameter

 

Transport capacity (2)

 

Transit capacity (3)

 

Compression stations

   
 
 
 
 
 

OUTSIDE ITALY

 

(units)

 

(km)

 

(inch)

 

(BCM/y)

 

(BCM/y)

 

(No.)

TENP (Bocholtz-Wallbach) 2 lines of km 500 1,000 36/38/40 22.9 15.5 4
Transitgas (Rodersdorf-Lostorf) 3 lines of km 165, 71 and 55 291 36/48 24.9 19.9 1
TAG (Baumgarten-Tarvisio) 3 lines of km 380 1,140 36/38/40/42 45.2 37.4 5
TTPC (Oued Saf Saf-Cap Bon) 2 lines of km 370 740 48 34.0 33.2 5
TMPC (Cap Bon-Mazara del Vallo) 5 lines of km 155 775 20/26 33.2 33.2  
GreenStream (Mellitah-Gela) 1 line of km 520 520 32 8.0 8.0 1
Blue Stream (Beregovaya-Samsun) 2 lines of km 387 774 24 16.0 16.0 1

Transport infrastructure

Route

Lines

Length of main line

Diameter

Transport capacity (1)

Pressure min-max

Compression stations







ITALY

(units)

(km)

(inch)

(mmCM/d)

(bar)

(No.)

Mazara del Vallo-Minerbio
(under upgrading)
 

2/3

 

1,480

 

48/42 - 48

 

103.6

 

75

 

7

Tarvisio-Sergnano-Minerbio 

3

 

433

 

42/36, 34 e 48/56

 

119.7

 

58/75

 

3

Passo Gries-Mortara 

1/2

 

177

 

48/34

 

64.9

 

55/75

 

1

Lines

Total length

Diameter

Transport capacity (2)

Transit capacity (3)

Compression stations







OUTSIDE ITALY

(units)

(km)

(inch)

(BCM/y)

(BCM/y)

(No.)

TENP (Bocholtz-Wallbach) 

2 lines of km 500

 

1,000

 

36/38/40

 

22.9

 

15.5

 

4

Transitgas (Rodersdorf-Lostorf) 

3 lines of km 165, 71 and 55

 

291

 

36/48

 

24.9

 

19.9

 

1

TAG (Baumgarten-Tarvisio) 

3 lines of km 380

 

1,140

 

36/38/40/42

 

45.2

 

37.4

 

5

TTPC (Oued Saf Saf-Cap Bon) 

2 lines of km 370

 

740

 

48

 

34.0

 

33.2

 

5

TMPC
(Cap Bon-Mazara del Vallo)
 

5 lines of km 155

 

775

 

20/26

 

33.2

 

33.2

  
GreenStream (Mellitah-Gela) 

1 line of km 520

 

520

 

32

 

8.0

 

8.0

 

1

Blue Stream
(Beregovaya-Samsun)
 

2 lines of km 387

 

774

 

24

 

16.0

 

16.0

 

1


(1)iTransport capacity refers to the capacity at the entry point connected to the import pipelines.
(2)iIncludes both transit capacity and volumes of natural gas destined to local markets and withdrawn at various points along the pipeline.
(3)iThe maximum volume of natural gas which is input at various entry points along the pipeline and transported to the next pipeline.

 

International Transport Activities

In order to import natural gas to Italy, Eni owns capacity entitlements in aan extensive network of international high pressure pipelines extending for a total length of overapproximately 4,400 kilometers enabling the Company to import natural gas produced in Russia, Algeria, the North Sea, including the Netherlands and Norway, and Libya to Italy. The Company participates in certain entities which own and operate those international pipelines, the pipeline owners, as well as in the entities which manage transportation rights, the carries companies. For financial reporting purposes, such entities are fully-consolidated or equity-accounted depending on the Company’s interest or agreements with other shareholders.

Management believes that the structure of the Company’s interests in those entities may undergo significant changes in the near future depending on the possible evolution of an antitrust proceeding before the European Commission relating to allegedly anti-competitive practices in the European market of natural gas, consisting in limiting third parties access to Eni’s participated gas pipelines thus restricting gas availability in Italy. The proceeding is fully disclosed in Note 28 to the Consolidated Financial Statements – Legal Proceedings. As part of that matter, on February 4, 2010, Eni formally filed a set of structural remedies relating certain international gas pipelines with the European Commission. With prior agreement from its partners, Eni committed to dispose of its interests in the German TENP, the Swiss Transitgas and the Austrian TAG gas pipelines. The European Commission intends to submit these remedies to a market test. In case the Commission approves those remedies upon conclusion of the market test, Eni will be in the position to settle the above mentioned antitrust proceeding without imposition of any fine or other measures. In light of the strategic importance of the Austrian TAG pipeline to the supply of the Italian system, which transports gas from Russia to Italy, Eni negotiated a solution with the Commission which called for the transfer of its stake to an entity controlled by the Italian State. If they are implemented, the remedies negotiated with the Commission will not affect Eni’s contractual gas transport rights.

63


A description of the main international pipelines participated or operated by Eni is provided below.

The TAG pipeline, 1,140-kilometer long, made up of three lines, each about 380-kilometer long, with a transport capacity of 37 BCM/y, and three compression stations. This pipeline transports Russian natural gas from Baumgarten, the delivery point at the border of Austria and Slovakia, to Tarvisio, point of entry in the Italian natural gas transport system. This facility is undergoing an upgrade project entailing the construction of two new compression stations in order to increase the transport capacity by 6.5 BCM/y. A first portion of 3.2 BCM/y has started operating in October 2008. The second portion of 3.3 BCM/y is

58


 expectedThe TAG pipeline, 1,140-kilometer long, made up of three lines, each about 380-kilometer long, with a transport capacity of 37 BCM/y and five compression stations. This pipeline transports Russian natural gas from Baumgarten, the delivery point at the border of Austria and Slovakia, to start operatingTarvisio, point of entry in the fourth quarterItalian natural gas transport system. In 2009, the upgrading of 2009. In 2008 the wholethis facility was finalized by completing construction of two new compression stations that increased transport capacity by 6.5 BCM/y. The entire new capacity has been entirely awarded to third parties following a transparent and non discriminatory procedure (lottery) agreed with Austrian and European Authorities.parties.
 The TTPC pipeline, 740-kilometer long, made up of two lines that are each 370-kilometer long with a transport capacity of 33.2 BCM/y and five compression stations. This pipeline transports natural gas from Algeria across Tunisia from Oued Saf Saf at the Algerian border to Cap Bon on the Mediterranean coast where it links with the TMPC pipeline. In 2008 the transportThe pipeline was recently upgraded by increasing compression capacity in order to enable transportation of this facility has been increased byan additional 6.5 BCM/y. A first portion of 3.2 BCM/y came on line on April 1,The upgrade was finalized in 2008 while the second portion of 3.3 BCM/y started operations in October 2008. The whole new capacity has been awarded to third parties.and became fully operational during 2009.
 The TMPC pipeline for the import of Algerian gas is 775-kilometer long made upand consists of five lines that are each 155-kilometer long with a transport capacity of 33.5 BCM/y. It crosses the underwater the Sicily Channel from Cap Bon to Mazara del Vallo in Sicily, the point of entry into the Italian natural gas transport system. In 2009, the operation of TMPC gas pipeline was fully restored. One of the five lines of the import pipeline from Algeria was damaged by an oil tanker anchor crossing the Sicily channel on December 19, 2008.
 The TENP pipeline is 1,000-kilometer long (two 500-kilometer long lines) withand has transport capacity of 15.5 BCM/y and four compression stations. It transports natural gas from the Netherlands through Germany, from the German-Dutch border of Bocholtz to Wallbach at the German-Swiss border.
 The Transitgas pipeline is 291-kilometer long withand has one compression station, that transports natural gas from the Netherlands and from Norway crossingacross Switzerland with its 165-kilometer long main line and a 71-kilometer long doubling line, from Wallbach where it joins the TENP pipeline to Passo Gries at the Italian border. It has a transport capacity of 20 BCM/y. A new 55-kilometer long line from Oltingue/Rodersdorf at the French-Swiss border to Lostorf, an interconnection point with the line coming from Wallbach, was built for the transport of Norwegian gas. Eni is assessing an upgrade of the capacity of this pipeline of 2 BCM/y. The final investment decision is subject to the approval of relevant authorities.
 The GreenStream pipeline that started operations in October 2004 for the import of Libyan gas produced inat Eni operated fields at Bahr Essalam and Wafa. It is 520-kilometer long with a transport capacity of 8 BCM/y and crosses underwater in the Mediterranean Sea from Mellitah on the Libyan coast to Gela in Sicily, the point of entry into the Italian natural gas transport system. EniIn 2009, the pipeline was upgraded by 3 BCM/y, which are expected to come fully on stream in 2010, bringing total capacity to 11 BCM/y. This additional capacity will support Eni’s plans to upgradeincrease gas production at its Libyan field to be implemented over the transport capacity of this pipeline by additional 3 BCM/y to 11 BCM/y with completion expected in 2012.next four years.

Eni holds a 50% interest in the Blue Stream underwater pipeline (water depth greater than 2,150 meters) linking the Russian coast to the Turkish coast of the Black Sea. This pipeline is 774-kilometer long on two lines and has transport capacity of 16 BCM/y. It is part of a joint venture to sell gas produced in Russia on the Turkish market.

The South Stream project

Eni and Gazprom are jointly assessing the technical and economic aspects of a project to build a new import route for importing gas from Russia to Europe throughto market gas produced in Russia.

Based on the Black Sea. agreements signed between Italy and Russia on May 15, 2009, the original scope of work of the project to build the South Stream pipeline has been enlarged, providing for an increase in transport capacity from the originally planned 31 BCM/y to 63 BCM/y.

The South Stream pipeline is expected to be composed by two sections: (i) an offshore 900-kilometer long section crossing the Black Sea from the Russian coast at Beregovaya (the same starting point of the Blue Stream pipeline) to the Bulgarian coast at Varna. It will be laid reaching water depths of more than 2,000 meters;Varna; and (ii) an onshore section crossing Bulgaria for which two options are currently being evaluated: one envisages crossing Serbiapointing North West and Hungary to connect to existing trunklines from Russia; another sectionone pointing South WestWest. The second option envisages crossing Greece and Albania thenthe Adriatic Sea before linking to the Italian network.

In December 2009, Eni and Gazprom will carry outsigned an agreement for the project using the most advanced technologies in full respectentrance of the strictest environmental criteria.French company Edf in the project. The conditions of the agreement will be defined in the coming months.

64


Regulated businesses in Italy

Italian Transport Activity

Eni, through Snam Rete Gas, a company listed on the Italian Stock Exchange, in which Eni holds a 50.03%52.54% interest, operates most of the Italian natural gas transport network, a re-gasification terminal located in Panigaglia, an extensive local distribution network and gas underground storage deposits and related facilities.

In 2009, management completed the reorganization of Eni’s regulated businesses in Italy by combining into a single entity all gas-related infrastructures whose remuneration is established by the Italian Authority for Electricity and Gas. The reorganization was implemented by divesting the parent company’s interests in Italgas SpA (100%) and Stoccaggi Gas Italia SpA (100%) to Snam Rete Gas, a subsidiary. The transaction is expected to deliver significant synergies for regulated businesses allowing Eni to maximize the value of both gas distribution and storage activities. For more details on this deal see "Significant Business and Portfolio Developments" above.

Management plans to invest approximately euro 6.4 billion in the next four years in the regulated businesses mainly directed to upgrading and developing the transport and distribution networks and storage capacity, aiming at strengthening security, flexibility and service quality of the gas infrastructures.

Specifically, in the next four-year period Eni plans to expand and upgrade transport networks (approximately euro 4.3 billion), the storage regulated capacity (approximately euro 1 billion), both through the development of new fields and the expansion of existing capacity, and upgrade and develop local distribution networks as well as to provide the only regasification terminal currently operating in Italy.substitution of old metering (approximately euro 1.1 billion).

Italian Transport Activity

Under Legislative Decree No. 164/2000 concerning the opening up of the natural gas market in Italy, transport and regasificationre-gasification activities are regulated by the Authority for Electricity and Gas which determines the methods for calculating tariffs and fixing the return on capital employed. This makes transport a low risk business capable of delivering stable returns.

Eni’s network extends for 31,474more than 31,500 kilometers and comprises: (i) a national transport network extending over 8,7798,871 kilometers, made up of high pressure trunk-lines mainly with a large diameter, which carry natural gas from the entry points to the system – import lines, storage sites and main Italian natural gas fields – to the linking points with regional transport networks. The national network includes also some interregional lines reaching important markets; and (ii) a regional transport network extending over 22,69522,660 kilometers, made up of smaller lines and allowing the transport of natural gas to large industrial complexes, power stations and local distribution companies in the various local areas served. The major pipelines interconnected with import trunk-lines that are part of Eni’s national network are:

for natural gas imported from Algeria (Mazara del Vallo delivery point):

59


for natural gas imported from Algeria (Mazara del Vallo delivery point):
  - two lines with a 48/42-inch diameter, each approximately 1,500-kilometer long, including the smaller pipes that cross underwater the Messina Strait, connect Mazara del Vallo on the Southern coast of Sicily where they link with the TMPC pipeline carrying Algerian gas, to Minerbio (near Bologna). This pipeline is undergoing an upgrade with the laying of a third line with a 48-inch diameter 528-kilometer583-kilometer long (of these 309505 are already operating). At the Mazara del Vallo entry point the available transport capacity, which is measured at the beginning of each thermal year starting on October 1, is approximately 102104 mmCM/d;
for natural gas imported from Libya (Gela delivery point):
for natural gas imported from Libya (Gela delivery point):
  - a 36-inch line, 67-kilometer long linking Gela, the entry point of the GreenStream underwater pipeline, to the national network near Enna along the trunkline transporting gas coming from Algeria. Transport capacity at the Gela entry point is approximately 3133 mmCM/d;
for natural gas imported from Russia (Tarvisio and Gorizia delivery points):
for natural gas imported from Russia (Tarvisio and Gorizia delivery points):
  - two lines with 42/36/34-inch diameters extending for a total length of approximately 900 kilometers connectconnecting the Austrian network at Tarvisio. This facility crosses the Po Valley reaching Sergnano (near Cremona) and Minerbio. This pipeline has been upgraded by the laying of a third 264-kilometer long line with a diameter from 48 to 56 inches. The pipeline transport capacity at the Tarvisio entry point amounts to approximately 106120 mmCM/d plus the transport capacity available at the Gorizia entry point of approximately 5 mmCM/d;
for natural gas imported from the Netherlands and Norway (Passo Gries delivery point):
for natural gas imported from the Netherlands and Norway (Passo Gries delivery point):
  - one line, with a 48-inch diameter and 177-kilometer long that extends from the Italian border at Passo Gries (Verbania), to the node of Mortara, in the Po Valley. The pipeline transport capacity at the Passo Gries entry point amounts to 65 mmCM/d;
for natural gas coming from the Panigaglia LNG terminal:
for natural gas coming from the Panigaglia LNG terminal:

65


  - one line, with a 30-inch diameter and 170-kilometer long that links the Panigaglia terminal to the national transport network near Parma. The pipeline transport capacity at the Panigaglia entry point amounts to 13 mmCM/d;
for natural gas coming from the Rovigo Adriatic LNG terminal:
for natural gas coming from the Rovigo Adriatic LNG terminal:
  - a 36-inch connection at the Minerbio junction with the Cavarzere-Minerbio pipeline belonging to Edison Stoccaggio SpA, which will receivereceives gas from the LNG terminal located offshore of Porto Viro, once in operation.Viro. The pipeline transport capacity at the Cavarzere entry point amounts to 26 mmCM/d.

In 2008, Eni’s national transport network increased by 393 kilometers due to certain upgrades to both national trunklines (231 kilometers) and the regional network (162 kilometers). Eni’s system is completed by: (i) 11eleven compressor stations with a total power of 830857 MW used to increase gas pressure in pipelines to the level required for its flow; and (ii) 5four marine terminals linking underwater pipelines with the on-land network at Mazara del Vallo Messina and GelaMessina in Sicily and Favazzina and Palmi in Calabria. The interconnections managed by Snam Rete Gas in the Italian transport network are guaranteed by 23 linkage and dispatching nodes and by 569 plant units including pressure reduction and regulation plants. These plants allow to regulatethe regulation of the flow of natural gas in the network and guarantee the connection of pipes working at different pressures.

Snam Rete Gas is currently assessing a project to build the Italian section of the new Galsi pipeline connecting Algeria to Italy through Sardinia with an 8 BCM/y capacity. The Italian section of this new infrastructure will be consist of an onshore section crossing Sardinia and an offshore section reaching Tuscany where it will link with the national network for a total length of 600 kilometers. Galsi will be responsible for project engineering and obtaining needed licenses and authorizations, while Snam Rete Gas will build the pipeline and manage it when operational.

For the next four years Snam Rete Gas approved a capital expenditure plan of approximately euro 4.3 billion aimed mainly at increasing transport capacity by 25% and upgrading the network in view of increasing import flows.

In 2008,2009, volumes of natural gas input in the national grid (85.64(76.90 BCM) increaseddecreased by 2.368.74 BCM, or 10.2%, from 2007, up 2.8%,2008, mainly due to higher volumes of naturallower gas input to storage for the rebuilding of stocks in summer monthsdeliveries as a result of higher offtakes related to higher seasonal sales registered in the first months of the year.weaker demand. Eni transported 33.8437.27 BCM of natural gas on behalf of third parties, up 2.950.09 BCM from 2007,2008, or 9.6%10.1%.

Gas volumes transported (a) 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
(BCM)
Eni 

57.09

 

52.39

 

51.80

On behalf of third parties 

30.90

 

30.89

 

33.84

  

87.99

 

83.28

 

85.64

Gas volumes transported (a) 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
  


(BCM)

Eni 52.39 51.80 39.63
On behalf of third parties 30.89 33.84 37.27
  83.28 85.64 76.90
  
 
 

(a)iIncludes amounts destined to domestic storage.

60


Transport capacity in Italy

Transport capacity in Italy 

2007-20082008-2009 Thermal year

 

2008-20092009-2010 Thermal year

  
 
Entry points 

Available capacity

 

Awarded capacity

 

Saturation

 

Available capacity

 

Awarded capacity

 

Saturation

  
 
 
 
 
 
  

(mmCM/d)

 

(mmCM/d)

 

(%)

 

(mmCM/d)

 

(mmCM/d)

 

(%)

Tarvisio 112.6 92.2 81.9 106.0 97.8 92.2
Mazara del Vallo 90.7 80.4 88.7 101.8 93.2 91.6
Passo Gries 63.5 59.6 93.8 64.9 60.8 93.7
Gela 30.3 29.5 97.3 30.5 30.5 100.0
GNL Panigaglia 13.0 11.4 87.7 13.0 11.4 87.7
Gorizia 4.8 0.5 9.4 4.8    
  314.9 273.6 86.9 321.0 293.7 91.5
  
 
 
 
 
 
Entry points

Available capacity

Awarded capacity

Saturation

Available capacity

Awarded capacity

Saturation







(mmCM/d)

(mmCM/d)

(%)

(mmCM/d)

(mmCM/d)

(%)

Tarvisio 106.0 97.8 92.2 119.7 102.8 85.9
Mazara del Vallo 101.8 93.2 91.6 103.6 98.7 95.3
Passo Gries 64.9 60.8 93.7 64.9 59.0 90.9
Gela 30.5 30.5 100.0 33.0 32.9 99.7
Cavarzere (LNG)       26.4 21.0 79.5
Panigaglia (LNG) 13.0 11.4 87.7 13.0 7.2 55.4
Gorizia 4.8     4.8    
  
 
 
 
 
 
  321.0 293.7 91.5 365.4 321.6 88.0
  
 
 
 
 
 

In 2008,2009, the LNG terminal in Panigaglia (La Spezia) regasified 1.521.32 BCM of natural gas (2.38(1.52 BCM in 2007)2008).

 

Distribution Activity

Distribution involves the delivery of natural gas to residential and commercial customers in urban centers through low pressure networks. Eni, through its 100%The subsidiary Italgas and other subsidiaries operatesoperate in the distribution activity in Italy serving 1,3201,322 municipalities through a low pressure network consisting of approximately 49,40050,000 kilometers of pipelines supplying 5.65.8 million customers and distributing 7.37.73 BCM in 2008. 2009.

Under Legislative Decree No. 164/2000, on the opening up of the natural gas market in Italy, distribution activities are considered a public service and therefore are regulated by the Authority for Electricity and Gas which determines the methods for calculating tariffs and fixing the return on capital employed. This business, therefore, presents a low risk and a steady cash generation profile.

66


Distribution activities are conducted under concession agreements whereby local public administrations award the service of gas distribution to companies. According to Legislative Decree No. 164/2000, the award of the service has to take place by competitive bid from the end of a transition period no later than December 31, 2012. Future concessions will last no more thanhave a term as long as twelve years. Eni intends to develop its market and improve efficiency and quality of services rendered.

Distribution activity in Italy 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
Volumes distributed 

(BCM)

 

7.54

 

7.44

 

7.63

- on behalf of Eni   

6.90

 

6.39

 

6.33

- on behalf of third parties   

0.64

 

1.05

 

1.30

Installed network 

(km)

 

48,724

 

48,746

 

49,410

Active meters 

(No. of users)

 

5,550,700

 

5,598,677

 

5,676,056

Municipalities served 

(No.)

 

1,317

 

1,318

 

1,320




Distribution activity in Italy 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
Volumes distributed: (BCM) 7.44 7.63 7.73
- on behalf to Eni   5.66 6.33 6.26
- on behalf to third parties   1.78 1.30 1.47
Installed network (km) 48,746 49,410 49,973
Active meters (No. of users) 5,598,677 5,676,105 5,770,672
Municipalities served (No.) 1,318 1,320 1,322
    
 
 

For the next four years, Eni has defined a capital expenditures plan of approximately euro 11.1 billion for the development/upgrade of its distribution networks and their technological upgrade.upgrade, and the substitution of gas metering.

In particular, in the medium-term Eni intends to consolidate its presence in Italy, by increasing the profitability of its asset base, security across the network, and improve the service quality as well as efficiency of services rendered.

 

Storage

Following the 100% divestment of Stogit to Snam Rete Gas that was approved by Eni’s Board of Directors and is expected to close by mid 2009 (for details on this deal see "Significant Business and Portfolio Developments" above), from 2009 the results of the storage business conducted in Italy described in the Exploration & Production section will beare reported within the Gas & Power segment under the "Regulated Business". starting in 2009. The storage gas business in Italy is a fully-regulated activity which returns are preset by the Italian Authority for Electricity and Gas. Italian regulated storage services are provided through eight storage fields, based on ten storage concessions vested by the Ministry of Productive Activities, with a total modulation capacity of 8.68.9 BCM.

From the beginning of its operations, Stogit progressively increased the number of customers served and the share of revenues from third parties.

Storage 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
Total storage capacity: (BCM) 13.6 13.7 13.9
- of which strategic storage   5.1 5.1 5.0
- of which available storage   8.5 8.6 8.9
Available capacity: (%)      
- share utilized by Eni   44 39 30
- share utilized by third parties   56 61 70
Total offtake from (input to) storage: (BCM) 9.27 11.57 16.52
- input to storage   4.00 6.30 7.81
- offtake from storage   5.27 5.27 8.71
Total customers (No.) 44 48 56
    
 
 

In addition2009, 8.71 BCM of gas were supplied (up 3.44 BCM from 2008) while 7.81 BCM were inputted to Company’s storage activities conducteddeposits, an increase of 1.51 BCM compared to 2008.

In 2009, storage capacity amounted to 13.9 BCM, of which 5 were destined to strategic storage.

The share of storage capacity used by third parties was 70% (61% in Italy, Eni, through its Gas & Power segment, engages in certain gas2008).

The Company plans to increase storage activities in Europe. Particularly, the Company is developing a storage facilitycapacity in the UK section of the North Sea following the acquisition of the Hewett Unit where certain depleted fields will be converted to gas storage deposits (for further detailed information see "Item 4 – Exploration & Production" above). The expected capital expenditure program for this project amounts to euro 0.7 billion with expected start-up in 2011. The storage capacitymedium-term.

6167


will be located to complement Eni’s production, sales and trading activities in Europe and will further enhance the flexibility of Eni’s portfolio in serving the main markets. Eni considers the development of gas storage facilities as a core element of the gas business. Gas storage capacity provides flexibility to match gas demand in peak periods, thereby contributing to the optimization of the gas supply portfolio. The activity of gas storage in the UK is de-regulated and results from this project will be reported within the "Marketing business".

Capital Expenditures

See "Item 5 – Liquidity and Capital Resources – Capital Expenditures by Segment".

 


Refining & Marketing

Eni’s Refining & Marketing segment engages in refining of crude oil and marketing of refined products primarily in Italy and in a number of European markets. Based on public data,Central-Eastern Europe. In Italy, Eni is the main operator in the markets forlargest refining and marketing operator in terms of capacity and market share.

The Company’s operations are fully integrated through refining, supply, trading, logistics and marketing so as to maximize cost efficiencies and effectiveness of operations.

In 2009, the trading environment was particularly unfavorable. Refining margins plunged to historical lows due to a rapid recovery in oil prices which the Company was unable to transfer to final prices of refined products due to weak demand, high worldwide and regional inventory levels and excess refining capacity.

In addition, profitability of complex throughputs was severely impacted by significantly compressed light-heavy crude differentials (from 5.1 $/BBL to 1.9 $/BBL in Italy.2008 and 2009, respectively) due to reduced availability of heavy crude oil in the Mediterranean area. Those trends resulted in Eni’s refining margins falling below break-even. Management expects that those trends are likely to persist for the next two to three years as demand for refined products will continue being affected by increasing energy efficiency and marketing operations are efficiently integrateduse of bio-fuels. The refining capacity is expected to rise particularly in Middle and supportedFar East Asia and the U.S. market will prove less keen to import gasoline. On the positive side, the eventual margin level will be influenced by a full set of logistic assets. Refining know-how, strong market acceptancethe pace of the brand, the ability to develop innovative fuels,global economic recovery and the integrationextent of refinery rationalization in the face of weak margins.

To cope with upstream operations represent Eni’s principal competitive advantages. Eni’s key medium-term target is to enhance the profitability of its downstream oil business and to reduce the cash requirements of the business by applying tight financial discipline on capital expenditures.

The strategic guidelines to attain this target are:challenging outlook, management plans to:

to upgrade Eni’s refining system through a focused capital program;
 to improve profitabilitykeep tight control on capital expenditures, particularly in refining through strong financial discipline in selecting capital projects;
strongly focus on cost reductions and qualitative standards of the Italian retail network;efficiency improvements; and
 to pursue higher levelsimprove profitability of operational efficiency.marketing activities by increasing the quality and range of its retail offer including non-oil activities and loyalty programs as well as by upgrading and restyling service stations.

As a result of all these actions, management believes that the Refining & Marketing segment will have a positive cash flow in 2012.

In the next four years the implementation of these strategies will be supported by a2010-2013 period, capital expenditure programis projected at euro 2.7 billion, confirming the same level of approximately euro 2.8 billion that will be directedthe previous plan. However, the share of expenditures dedicated to marketing is planned to increase from 25% to 40% as the Company intends to upgrade Eni’s most efficient and profitable refineries and improve the quality standards of Eni’s retail operations, in particularits networks in Italy expanding activities for the supply of non oil products and developing the market share in selected European markets. Efficiency improvement actions will be directedmarkets, also finalizing the process of restyling and re-branding to the "eni" brand all activities targeting control of operating costsservice stations. Management plans to upgrade the Company’s best refineries by investing euro 1.6 billion to increase plant conversion and improvement of energy efficiency.flexibility as well as to comply with all applicable HSE regulations.

The matters regarding future plans discussed in this section and elsewhere herein are forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those in such forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include difficulties in obtaining approvals from relevant Antitrust Authorities and developments in the relevant market.

 

Supply and Trading

In 2008,2009, a total of 57.9167.40 mmtonnes of crude were purchased by the Company’s Refining & Marketing segment (59.56division (57.91 mmtonnes in 2007)2008), of which 29.7132.75 mmtonnes was from Eni’s Exploration & Production segment.division. Volumes amounting to 16.1119.71 mmtonnes were purchased under long-term supply contracts with producing countries, while 12.0914.94 mmtonnes were purchased on the spot market. Approximately 29%25% of crude purchased in 20082009 came from West Africa, 19% from European and Asian Russia, 29% from North Africa, 14%15% from the Middle East, 14%13% from North Africa, 11% from the North Sea, 4% from Italy and 6%13% from Italy.other areas.

Approximately 2636.11 mmtonnes of crude purchased in 20082009 were resold, up 0.7%an increase of 38.9% from 2007.2008. In addition, 3.392.92 mmtonnes of intermediate products were purchased (3.59(3.39 mmtonnes in 2007)2008) to be used as feedstock in conversion plants and 17.4213.98 mmtonnes of refined products (16.14(17.42 mmtonnes in 2007)2008) were purchased to be sold

68


on markets outside Italy (10.10 mmtonnes) and on the domestic market (3.88 mmtonnes) as a complement production availability.to available production.

 

Refining

Against the backdrop of a challenging refining environment, in the medium-term management plans to improve the cost position of the Company’s refining operations, while continuing to keep tight control over capital employed and selectively upgrading conversion capacity and flexibility of the best refineries. Cost efficiencies are expected to mainly target labor costs and refinery processes, including energy conservation.

As of December 31, 2009, Eni’s refining system hashad total refinery capacity (balanced with conversion capacity) of approximately 36.837.3 mmtonnes (equal to 737747 KBBL/d) and a conversion index of 57.6%59.8%. The conversion index is a measure of a refinery complexity. The higher the index, the wider is the spectrum of crude qualities and feedstock that a refinery is able to process thus enabling it to benefit from the cost economies associated withwhich the fact thatCompany generally expects to achieve as certain qualities of crude (particularly the heavy ones) may trade at discount with reference to the light crude benchmark Brent.Brent benchmark. Eni’s five 100-percent owned refineries have balanced capacity of 27.227.7 mmtonnes (equal to 544554 KBBL/d), with a 60.3%63.1% conversion rate.

In 2008,2009, refinery throughputs in Italy and outside Italy were 35.8434.55 mmtonnes.

62


In the next four years, Eni plans to selectively upgrade its refining system by increasing complexity and flexibility of plants, using Eni’s proprietary EST technology and achieving a conversion index of 65% in Europe (71% in Italy). The completion of construction of three new hydrocrackers at Sannazzaro, Taranto and Bayernoil is scheduled in 2009.its best refineries. Middle distillate yields are expected to come in at 45%43% from 40%41% in 2008 (more than2009 (approximately double of gasoline yields) as the new hydro-cracking units recently started up in Sannazzaro, Taranto and Bayernoil are planned to improve yields. Additionally, management plans to build a new conversion unit at the Sannazzaro refinery which will be based on the EST proprietary technology for converting the heavy barrel by almost eliminating residue from conversion processes. The start-up of this unit is scheduled in 2012. Higher conversion capacity is expected enable the Company to extract value from equity crude as well as capture opportunities of monetizing heavy crudes and non conventional resources.

Management also targets flexibility enhancement at the Company refineries whereby the Company intends to achieve a 15 percentage point increase in the share of spot crude supplies which are destined to processes. Logistics and process optimization will help in selecting the most profitable slate to satisfy market needs for final products. Equity crude volumes processed are also expected to increase from 19.0% to 19.6%. Improvement in operations as

As result of investment upgrading and efficiency actions targeting operating costsand taking into account the expected recovery in market fundamentals and throughputs, improvement in operations are expected to enable refining operations to lowerincrease our internally tracked PUI (Process Utilization Index) by 10 percentage points from the break-even level with respectcurrent 77% to 2008. This means that in the medium-term our refineries will achieve positive results in a lower refining margin scenario compared to 2008. Management’s projections about the break-even level also take into account the operating expenses required to comply with environmental rules on the emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2) which amounted to approximately euro 17 million in 2008 as the business emissions are higher than the entitled allowance based on the criteria of Law Decree No. 216/2006 which implemented in Italy the EU Directive on Emission Trading (see below under the section Environmental Regulation). Management expects that the Refining & Marketing business will incur a level of operating expenses similar to 2008 in the next four-years to comply with the outlined environmental regulation.87% by 2013.

In the next four-years period, Eni’s investment plans are designed to take advantage of certain expected market trends in the refining industry:

(i)a significant reduction in European demand for gasoline, despite the diffusion of new gasoline fuelled engines with efficiency levels in consumption comparable to those of diesel fuel, is expected in the medium-term, while consumption of diesel fuel is expected to grow driven by the continuing renewal of the car fleet;
(ii)a slowdown in the demand for gasoline on the U.S. market is expected, reflecting the negative economic scenario, the diffusion of more energy efficient car models and the increasingly widespread use of bio-fuels;
(iii)implementation of increasingly tight environmental regulations in Europe will require significant capital expenditures for refinery upgrading;
(iv)demand for fuel oil is expected to decrease due to increasingly strong competition from natural gas in firing power plants; and
(v)opportunities will arise to monetize heavy crudes and non conventional resources by applying advanced refinery technologies.

Eni’s refinery capital projects will be designed to: (i) increase plant conversion capacity in view of boosting middle distillate yields and extracting value from equity crude; (ii) improve refinery flexibility in order to optimize processed feedstock and capture market opportunities arising from an expected increased availability of heavy/sour crudes that are typically discounted in the marketplace; (iii) produce fuels in line with product specifications provided for increasingly tight European environmental standards; and (iv) enhance operational efficiency of refineries, including energy efficiency gains.

69


The table below sets forth certain statistics regarding Eni’s refineries atas of December 31, 2008.2009.

Refining system in 20082009

  

Ownership share
(%)

 

Distillation capacity
(total)
(KBBL/d)

 

Distillation capacity
(Eni’s share)
(KBBL/d)

 

Primary balanced refining capacity
(Eni’s (Eni’s share)
(KBBL/d)

 

Conversion index (1)
(%)

 

Fluid catalytic cracking - FCC (2)
(KBBL/d)

 

Residue conversion
(KBBL/d)

 

Go-Finer
(KBBL/d)

 

Mild Hydro- cracking/ Hydro- cracking
(KBBL/d)

 

Visbreaking/ Thermal Cracking
(KBBL/d)

 

Coking
(KBBL/d)

 

Distillation capacity utilization rate
(Eni’s share)
(%)

 

Balanced refining capacity utilization rate
(Eni’s share)
(%)

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Wholly owned refineries   

685

 

685

 

544

 

60.3

 

69

 

22

 

37

 

29

 

89

 

47

 

82

 

94

   

685

 

685

 

554

 

63

 

69

 

33

 

37

 

29

 

89

 

46

 

70

 

87

Italy                                                    
Sannazzaro 

100

 

223

 

223

 

170

 

50.9

 

34

     

29

 

29

   

73

 

99

 

100

 

223

 

223

 

180

 

61

 

34

 

11

   

29

 

29

   

78

 

96

Gela 

100

 

129

 

129

 

100

 

144.8

 

35

   

37

     

47

 

82

 

101

 

100

 

129

 

129

 

100

 

142

 

35

   

37

     

46

 

60

 

78

Taranto 

100

 

120

 

120

 

110

 

64.6

   

22

     

38

   

97

 

79

 

100

 

120

 

120

 

110

 

65

   

22

     

38

   

72

 

78

Livorno 

100

 

106

 

106

 

84

 

11.4

             

88

 

102

 

100

 

106

 

106

 

84

 

11

             

66

 

83

Porto Marghera 

100

 

107

 

107

 

80

 

20.2

         

22

   

79

 

86

 

100

 

107

 

107

 

80

 

20

         

22

   

69

 

92

Partially owned refineries (3)   

874

 

245

 

193

 

49.7

 

163

 

25

   

99

 

27

   

77

 

98

   

874

 

245

 

193

 

50

 

163

 

25

   

99

 

27

   

83

 

94

Italy                                                    
Milazzo 

50

 

248

 

124

 

80

 

73.0

 

41

 

25

   

32

     

68

 

99

 

50

 

248

 

124

 

80

 

73

 

41

 

25

   

32

     

73

 

98

Germany                                                    
Ingolstadt/Vohburg/
Neustadt (Bayernoil)
 

20

 

215

 

43

 

41

 

34.0

 

49

     

43

     

93

 

95

Vohburg/Neustadt
(Bayernoil)
 

20

 

215

 

43

 

41

 

36

 

49

     

43

     

95

 

95

Schwedt 

8.33

 

231

 

19

 

19

 

41.8

 

49

       

27

   

98

 

102

 

8.33

 

231

 

19

 

19

 

42

 

49

       

27

   

105

 

105

Czech Republic                                                    
Kralupy e Litvinov
(Ceska Rafinerska)
 

32.4

 

180

 

59

 

53

 

29.6

 

24

     

24

     

86

 

80

Kralupy e Litvinov 

32.4

 

180

 

59

 

53

 

30

 

24

     

24

     

84

 

84

Total refineries   

1,559

 

930

 

737

 

57.6

 

232

 

47

 

37

 

128

 

116

 

47

 

81

 

95

   

1,559

 

930

 

747

 

60

 

232

 

58

 

37

 

128

 

116

 

46

 

73

 

89

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 














(1)iStated in fluid catalytic cracking equivalent/topping (% by weight), based on 100% of balanced primary distillation capacity.
(2)iConversion plant where vacuum feedstock undergoes cracking at high pressure and moderate temperature thus producing mostly high quality gasoline. This kind of plant guarantees high operating flexibility to the refinery.
(3)iCapacity of conversion plant is 100%.

63


Italy

Eni’s refining system in Italy is composed of five 100-percent owned refineries and a 50% interest in the Milazzo refinery in Sicily. Each of Eni’s refineries in Italy has operating and strategic features that aim at maximizing the value associated to the asset structure, the geographic positioning with respect to end markets and the integration with Eni’s other activities.

The Sannazzaro refinery has balanced refining capacity of 170180 KBBL/d and a conversion index of 50.9%61.2%. It is one of the most efficient refineries in Europe. Located in the Po Valley, it mainly supplies mainly markets in North-Western Italy and Switzerland. The high degree of flexibility of this refinery allows it to process a wide range of feedstock. From a logistical standpoint this refinery is located along the route of the Central Europe Pipeline, which links the GenovaGenoa terminal with French speaking Switzerland. This refinery contains two primary distillation plants and relevant facilities, including three desulphurizationdesulfurization units. Conversion is obtained through a fluid catalytic cracker (FCC), a mild hydrocracker (HdCK) middle distillate conversion unit and a visbreaking thermal conversion unit with a gasification facility using the heavy residue from visbreaking (tar) to produce syngas to feed the nearby EniPower power plant at Ferrera Erbognone. A significant conversionIn 2009, the upgrading of the refinery capacity and flexibility upgrading program is ongoing in order to transform it in a world class plant. In particular,increased by a new hydrocracking unit with a processing capacity ofHdCK 28 KBBL/d is under construction with expected start-upthat came on stream in June 2009. In addition Eni plans to develop a conversion plant employing the Eni Slurry Technology with a 23 KBBL/d capacity for the processing of extra heavy crude with high sulphursulfur content producing high quality middle distillates, in particular gasoil, and reducing the yield of fuel oil to zero. Start-up of this facility is scheduled in late 2012.

The Taranto refinery has balanced refining capacity of 110 KBBL/d and a conversion index of 64.6%64.8%. This refinery can process a wide range of crude and other feedstock. It mainly produces fuels for automotive use and residential heating purposes for the Southern Italian markets. Besides its primary distillation plants and relevant facilities, including two units for the desulphurization of middle distillates, this refinery contains a two-stage thermal conversion plant (visbreaking/thermal cracking) and an RHU conversion plant for the conversion of high sulphursulfur content residues into valuable products and catalytic cracking feedstocks. It processes most of the oil produced in Eni’s Val d’Agri fields carried to Taranto through the Monte Alpi pipeline (in 20082009 a total of 2.31.5 mmtonnes of this oil were processed). AThe new hydrocracking unit with a capacity of 17 KBBL/d is expected to startstarted production in 2009.2010. Eni’s plan to upgrade the conversion capacity of this refinery will enable to extract value from fuel oil and other semifinishedsemi-finished products currently exported.

Gela, with has a balanced refining capacity of 100 KBBL/d and a conversion index of 144.8%, this142.4%. This refinery is located on the Southern coast of Sicily and is highly integrated with upstream operations as it processes heavy crude produced from Eni’s nearby Eni fields offshore and onshore fields in Sicily. In addition, it is integrated downstream as it supplies large volumes of petrochemical feedstock to Eni’s in site petrochemical plants. The refinery also manufactures fuels for automotive use and petrochemical feedstock. Its high conversion level is ensured by an FCC unit with go-finer for the upgrading of feedstocks and two coking plants for the vacuum conversion of heavy residues. The power plant of this refinery also contains modern residue and exhaust fume treatment plants which allow full compliance with the tightest environmental standards. An upgrade of the Gela refinery is underway by

70


means of an upgrade of its power plant, through the revamping of its boilers, aimed at increasing profitability by exploiting the synergies deriving from the integration of refining and power generation.

Livorno, with a balanced refining capacity of 84 KBBL/d and a conversion index of 11.4%, manufactures mainly gasoline, fuel oil for bunkering and lubricant bases. Besides its primary distillation plants, this refinery contains two lubricant manufacturing lines. Its pipeline links with the local harbor and with the Florence storage sites by means of two pipelines optimizes intake, handling and distribution of products.

Porto Marghera, with a balanced refining capacity of 80 KBBL/d and a conversion index of 20.2%, this refinery supplies mainly markets in North-Eastern Italy and Austria. Besides its primary distillation plants, this refinery contains a two-stage thermal conversion plant (visbreaking/thermal cracking) designed to increase yields of valuable products.

 

Rest of Europe

In Germany, Eni holds an 8.3% interest in the Schwedt refinery and a 20% interest in Bayernoil, an integrated pole that included the Ingolstadt, Vohburg and Neustadt refineries. Eni’s refining capacity in Germany amounts to approximately 7060 KBBL/d mainly used to supply Eni’s distribution network in Bavaria and Eastern Germany.

In 2008, the restructuring of the whole complex was completed with the closing down and divestment of the Ingolstadt site, the construction of a new hydrocracker with a capacity of approximately 2 mmtonnes/y (40 KBBL/d), the revamping other assets (in particular a reformer and a hydrofiner) and the shutting-down of a toppinghydrocraking unit in Neustadt. The project completed in 2008 with start-up in the second half of December and production expectedcome on stream in 2009 aimed at increasingdetermining an increase of middle distillate yields and reducinga corresponding reduction of the production of gasoline.gasoline giving more profitability to the activities conducted at the integrated refining pole.

64


Eni holds a 32.4% stake in Ceska Rafinerska, which includes two refineries, Kralupy and Litvinov, in the Czech Republic. Eni’s share of refining capacity amounts to about 53 KBBL/d.

In addition, with its 33.34% interest in Galp, with the Portuguese group Amorim Eni jointly controls two refineries in Portugal: a small one in Porto specialized in the manufacture of lubricant bases and a larger and more complex onerefinery in Sines integrated with petrochemicals.

The table below sets forth Eni’s petroleum products availability figures for the periods indicated.

Availability of refined products 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
(mmtonnes)
Italy         
Refinery throughputs         
At wholly-owned refineries 27.17  27.79  25.59 
Less input on account of third parties (1.53) (1.76) (1.37)
At affiliates refineries 7.71  6.42  6.17 
Refinery throughputs on own account 33.35  32.45  30.39 
Consumption and losses (1.45) (1.63) (1.61)
Products available for sale 31.90  30.82  28.78 
Purchases of refined products and change in inventories 4.45  2.16  2.56 
Products transferred to operations outside Italy (4.82) (3.80) (1.42)
Consumption for power generation (1.10) (1.13) (1.00)
Sales of products 30.43  28.05  28.92 
Outside Italy         
Refinery throughputs on own account 4.69  4.70  5.45 
Consumption and losses (0.32) (0.31) (0.25)
Products available for sale 4.37  4.39  5.20 
Purchases of finished products and change in inventories 11.51  13.91  15.14 
Products transferred from Italian operations 4.82  3.80  1.42 
Sales of products 20.70  22.10  21.76 
Refinery throughputs on own account 38.04  37.15  35.84 
of which: total equity crude input 12.50  9.29  6.98 
Total sales of refined products in Italy and outside Italy 51.13  50.15  50.68 
Crude oil sales 30.66  25.82  26.00 
TOTAL SALES 81.79  75.97  76.68 

Availability of refined products 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
  


(mmtonnes)

ITALY         
Refinery throughputs         
At wholly-owned refineries 27.79  25.59  24.02 
Less input on account of third parties (1.76) (1.37) (0.49)
At affiliates refineries 6.42  6.17  5.87 
Refinery throughputs on own account 32.45  30.39  29.40 
Consumption and losses (1.63) (1.61) (1.60)
Products available for sale 30.82  28.78  27.80 
Purchases of refined products and change in inventories 2.16  2.56  3.73 
Products transferred to operations outside Italy (3.80) (1.42) (3.89)
Consumption for power generation (1.13) (1.00) (0.96)
Sales of products 28.05  28.92  26.68 
OUTSIDE ITALY         
Refinery throughputs on own account 4.70  5.45  5.15 
Consumption and losses (0.31) (0.25) (0.25)
Products available for sale 4.39  5.20  4.90 
Purchases of finished products and change in inventories 13.91  15.14  10.12 
Products transferred from Italian operations 3.80  1.42  3.89 
Sales of products 22.10  21.76  18.91 
  

 

 

Refinery throughputs on own account 37.15  35.84  34.55 
of which: refinery throughputs of equity crude on own account 9.29  6.98  5.11 
  

 

 

Total sales of refined products 50.15  50.68  45.59 
Crude oil sales 25.82  26.00  36.11 
  

 

 

TOTAL SALES 75.97  76.68  81.70 
  

 

 

71


In 2008,2009, refining throughputs on own account in Italy and outside Italy were 35.8434.55 mmtonnes, down 1.311.29 mmtonnes from 2007,2008, or 3.5%3.6%. Volumes processed in Italy decreased by 2.06 mmtonnes,approximately 990 ktonnes, or 6.3%3.3%, mainly at the Gela plant due to the extension of planned and unplanned refinery downtime, at the Taranto, Porto Marghera and Gela plants, as well as lower volumes at the Livorno and Taranto plants as refinery operations were rescheduled to take account of a weak demand for products. Volumes processed outside Italy declined by approximately 330 ktonnes in particular in the Czech Republic and in Germany due to a challenging refining environmentlower utilization of plant capacity in response to weak market conditions and the first halfrestructuring of the year. The increase recorded outside Italy (up 750 ktonnes) was mainly due to higher capacity entitlements at Ceska Rafinerska following the purchase of an additional ownership interest made in 2007, partly offset by the lower volumesIngolstadt facility in Germany.

Total throughputs in wholly-owned refineries (25.59(24.02 mmtonnes) decreased 2.20by 1.57 mmtonnes, down 7.9%or 6.1%, from 2007. 2008, due to lower refining throughputs for third parties in the Venice and Sannazzaro plants for the termination of the agreement with Tamoil at the end of 2008.

Approximately 21.5%16.3% of volumes of processed crude was supplied by Eni’s Exploration & Production segment (30.2%(21.5% in 2007)2008) representing a 8.7%5.2 percentage point decrease from 2007, equivalent2008, corresponding to a lower volume of 2.3 mmtonnes due to lower equity crude availability from Russia, Libya and Italy.1.87 mmtonnes.

 

Logistics

Eni is a primary operator in storage and transport of petroleum products in Italy with its logistical integrated infrastructure consisting of 21 directly managed storage sites and a network of petroleum product pipelines for the sale and storage of refined products, LPG and crude.

Eni’s logistic model is organized on hub structure including five main areas. These hubs monitor and centralize the handling of products flows aiming to drive forward more efficiency particularly in cost control of collection and delivery of orders.

Eni holds interests in five joint entities established by partnering the major Italian operators. These are located in Vado Ligure-Genova (Petrolig), Arquata Scrivia (Sigemi), Venice (Petroven), Ravenna (Petra) and Trieste (DCT) and aim at reducing logistic costs, and increasing efficiency.

Eni operates in the transport of oil and refined products: (i) on land through a pipeline network of leased and owned pipelines extending over 3,019 kilometers (1,447(of which 1,447 kilometers in operation and are owned by Eni); and (ii) by sea through spot and long-term lease contracts of tanker ships. Secondary distribution to retail and wholesale markets is effected through third parties who also own their means of transportation, in some instances with minority participation of Eni.

65


In 2008 Eni implemented a new hub model made up of five main areas in Italy and including all Eni logistic assets among which refining ones. This new model aims to enhance the efficiency of logistic operations by: (i) centralizing the handling of products flows on a single platform enabling real time monitoring; and (ii) introducing more efficient operating modes in the collection and delivery of orders with the aim of reducing unit delivery costs.

 

Marketing

Eni markets a wide range of refined petroleum products, primarily in Italy, through an extensive operated network of service stations, franchises and other distribution systems.

72


The table below sets forth Eni’s sales of refined products by distribution channel for the periods indicated.

Oil products sales in Italy and outside Italy 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
(mmtonnes)
Italy      
Retail marketing 8.66 8.62 8.81
Wholesale marketing 11.74 11.09 11.15
  20.40 19.71 19.96
Petrochemicals 2.61 1.93 1.70
Other sales 7.42 6.41 7.26
Total 30.43 28.05 28.92
Outside Italy      
Retail marketing 3.82 4.03 3.86
Wholesale marketing 4.60 4.96 5.38
  8.42 8.99 9.24
Other sales 12.28 13.11 12.52
Total 20.70 22.10 21.76
  51.13 50.15 50.68
Oil products sales in Italy and outside Italy 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
  

(mmtonnes)

Italy      
Retail 8.62 8.81 9.03
Wholesale 11.09 11.15 9.56
  19.71 19.96 18.59
Petrochemicals 1.93 1.70 1.33
Other sales 6.41 7.26 6.76
Total 28.05 28.92 26.68
Outside Italy      
Retail 3.18 3.22 2.99
Wholesale 3.77 4.50 4.07
  6.95 7.72 7.06
Other sales 13.11 12.52 11.85
Total 20.06 20.24 18.91
Iberian Peninsula (a) 2.04 1.52  
of which:      
Retail 0.85 0.64  
Wholesale 1.19 0.88  
  
 
 
TOTAL SALES 50.15 50.68 45.59
  
 
 

(a) 

Downstream activities in the Iberian Peninsula were divested to Galp in October 2008.

In 2009, excluding the impact of the divestment of marketing activities in the Iberian Peninsula in 2008 (down 1.52 mmtonnes), sales volumes of refined products (50.68(45.59 mmtonnes) were up 0.53down 3.57 mmtonnes from 2007,2008, or 1.1%7.3%, mainly due to larger volumes soldlower wholesale sales on retailthe domestic and wholesale markets in Italy and wholesale market in the rest of Europe.foreign market.

 

Retail Sales in Italy

Eni marketsIn 2010, the re-branding to “eni” brand of all the Company’s downstream activities was launched. Following this project and the restyling of service stations the Company will market refined products in Italy troughthrough its Agip-branded networkrenewed eni-branded network.

In marketing operations, Eni plans to strengthen its competitive positioning in Italy and targets to expand its share in the domestic retail market for fuels to 34% by 2013, through improving quality and range of operated service stations. In 2008,offer including non-oil activities, leveraging on marketing initiatives and innovative non oil formats as well as strengthening customers’ loyalty through the launch of new loyalty programs. Planned actions are also designed to attain European standards in terms of both quality of offered services and environment regulation compliance. A strong focus will be devoted to pursue high levels of operating efficiency.

By 2013, Eni expects to achieve volumes of refined products marketedapproximately 12.2 billion liters sold (approximately 11.4 billion liters in 2009) with a retail network composed of 4,451 service stations, of which 75% is owned.

In 2009, while domestic consumption was barely unchanged, retail sales on the Italian network (8.81(9.03 mmtonnes) were up 190approximately 220 ktonnes from 2007,2008, or 2.2%2.5%, despite a decrease recorded in domestic consumption, mainly due to loyalty programs, marketing activities ("Iperself" promotional campaign –and pricing initiatives, in particular “Iperself” sales (for further details see below –below), and fidelity programs)the opening of new services stations that sustained a 0.9 percentage point growth in market share growth from 29.2%30.6% in December 2008 to 30.6%; market share is computed as ratio of Eni’s sales volumes to national consumption as published31.5% in national statistics.December 2009. Higher sales mainly related to gasoil and LPG sales, while gasoline sales registered a decrease.declined slightly.

The average throughput per service station measured on gasoline and gasoil sales was 2,470 kliters, an increaseAs of 26 kliters from 2007, or up 1.1%.

At December 31, 2008,2009, Eni’s retail network in Italy consisted of 4,4094,474 service stations, 19 more than atan increase of 65 from December 31, 2007,2008 (4,409 service stations), resulting from the positive balance of acquisitions/releases of lease concessions (32(90 units), the opening of new service stations (7 units), partlywhich were partially offset by the closing of service stations with low throughput (19(24 units) and the release of one9 service stationstations under highway concession.

Average throughput related to gasoline and gasoil (2,482 kliters) registered an increase of 13 kliters from 2008.

In 2008,2009, fuel sales of the Blu line (BluSuper and BluDieselTech) – high performance and low environmental impact fuel – declinedrecorded lower prices from 2008 with the stability of sales due to sensitivity of demand to prices of these products in an environment of economic downturnmarketing initiatives and high fuel prices on average.fidelity

73


programs during the year. Sales of BluDiesel and its reformulated version BluDieselTech amounted to 583approximately 600 ktonnes (677(720 mmliters), declining by 152 ktonnes from 2007 and represented 10.6%10.5% of gasoil sales on Eni’s retail network. At year end,As of December 31, 2009, service stations marketing BluDiesel totaled 4,0954,104 units (4,065 in 2007)(4,095 as of December 31, 2008) covering to approximately 93%92% of Eni’s network.

Retail sales of BluSuper amounted to 7882 ktonnes (91(110 mmliters) and decreased by 20 ktonnes, barely unchanged from 20072008, and covered 2.5%2.6% of gasoline sales on Eni’s retail network. At year end,As of December 31, 2009, service stations marketing BluSuper totaled 2,6312,679 units (2,565 at(2,631 as of December 31, 2007)2008), covering approximately 60% of Eni’s network.

66


In 2007, Eni launched its "You&Agip"2009, the promotional campaign lasting“You&Agip” was completed. The promotion was originally launched in March 2007 and lasted 3 years, designed to boost customer loyalty to the Agip brand. years.

This three-year long initiative offersoffered prizes to customers in proportion to their purchases of fuels and convenience items through the accumulation of points on a loyalty card at Agip’sservice stations’ stores as well as at the ones of certain partners to the program. At every purchase

As of fuels or convenience items, clients are granted a proportional amount of points that are credited to a fidelity card. Clients are able to decide how to accumulate points and when to spend them. At December 31, 2008,2009, the number of customers that actively used the card in the periodyear amounted to over about 4approximately 5.4 million. The average number of cards active each month was over 3 million.3.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. Volumes of fuel marketed under this initiative represented 46%over 45% of total volumes marketed on Eni’s service stations joining the program, and 44% of overall volumes marketed on Eni’s network. In February 2010, Eni launched the new promotional campaign “you&eni” which will last for 3 years until January 31, 2013, designed to boost customer loyalty to the unique “eni” brand for all the Company’s downstream activities.

In 2008, Eni revamped its "Iperself"2009, the success of Eni’s “Iperself” promotional campaign whichcontinued. This promotion provides a euro 0.06 discount per liter to customers purchasing fuel in self service stations during closing hours. Supported byJointly with other marketing activities this initiative allowed to achieve higher sales and a highersupported market share gains in retail marketing even in an environment characterized by a steep decline in domestic demand.

Eni plans to strengthen its competitive positioning in Italy by upgrading its outlets. Management targets to expand its share in the domestic retail market for fuels by 2012 from the 2008 level of 30.6%. Planned actions are designed to attain European standards of quality and services, leveraging on innovative marketing initiatives aimed at strengthening clients loyalty, develop the offer of premium products and develop innovative non oil formats. A strong focus will be devoted to pursue high levels of operating efficiency. In the next four years, Eni plans capital expenditures for the construction, upgrading and restructuring of its plants, increasing the number of "Iperself" and fully automated service stations as well as complying with applicable environmental standards and regulations.

By 2012, Eni expects to achieve volumes of approximately 11.4 billion liters sold (approximately 11 billion liters in 2008) with a retail network composed of 4,451 service stations, of which 75% owned.

 

Retail Sales in the Rest of Europe

In recent years, Eni’s strategy in the rest of Europe is focused on selectively growing its market share, particularly by means of acquiring valuable assets in European areas with interesting profitability perspectives. In implementing its growth strategy, Eni has been able to leverageEastern and Central Europe leveraging on synergies ensured by the proximity of these markets to Eni’s production and logistic facilities, brand awareness and economies of scale.

Growth outside Italy will continueExcluding the impact of the divestment of marketing activities in the Iberian Peninsula to be selective and aimed at strengthening Eni’s competitive positionGalp (down 0.64 mmtonnes), in key markets.

In 20082009, retail sales of refined products marketed in the rest of Europe (3.86(2.99 mmtonnes) waswere down 170approximately 230 ktonnes from 2007,2008, or 4.2%7.1%, mainly in the Iberian Peninsula,Germany and Eastern Europe due to the disposala decrease in fuel demand.

As of downstream activities to Galp, and in Germany. These decreases were partly offset by higher sales in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovakia due to the purchase of assets made in the fourth quarter of 2007.

At December 31, 2008,2009, Eni’s retail network in the rest of Europe consisted of 1,5471,512 units, a decrease of 50335 units from December 31, 2007 (2,0502008 (1,547 service stations). The network evolution was as follows: (i) divestment of 371 service stations in the Iberian Peninsula to Galp; (ii) a negative balance of acquisition/releases of leased service station was recorded (down 135 units), with positive changes in Hungary and Switzerland and negative ones in Germany; (iii) 1732 low throughput service stations were closed; (ii) negative balance of acquisitions/releases of lease concessions (32 units) with negative changes in Germany and positive changes in Hungary; (iii) purchased 21 service station, in particular in Romania; and (iv) purchased 15 service stations; and (v) opened 5the opening of 8 new outlets. Average throughput (2,577(2,461 kliters) was substantially in line with 2007.decreased by 116 kliters from 2008.

The key markets of Eni’s presence are: Austria with a 7%7.3% market share, Hungary with 11.6%, Czech Republic with 11.4%11.3%, Slovakia with 10.2%9.2%, Switzerland with 6.4% and Germany with a 3.8%3.4% on national base. These market shares were calculated by Eni based on public data on national consumption and Eni’s sales volumes.

In 2008, management divested its retail and wholesale marketing activities in the Iberian Peninsula following the exercise of a call option on part of Eni’s partner Galp Energia (Eni’s share being 33.34%), in accordance with the agreement signed in December 2005 by the majority shareholders of Galp Energia (in addition to Eni, Amorim Energia and Caixa Geral de Depósitos). The transaction includes 371 Agip-branded service stations.

Growth outside Italy will continue to be selective and aimed at strengthening Eni’s competitive position in key markets, based on the competitive advantage provided by synergies in supply, logistics and brand awareness. Eni intends to focus on the German, Swiss and Austrian markets where it targets to increase its market share.

Non oil activities in the rest of Europe are carried out under the CiaoAgip® brand name in 1,0321,152 service stations, of these 325which 398 are in Germany and 168159 in France with a 67%76% coverage of the network and a virtually complete coverage of owned stations.

67


Other businesses

Wholesale

Eni markets gasoline and other fuels on the wholesale market in Italy, including diesel fuel for automotive use and for heating purposes, for agricultural vehicles and for vessels and fuel oil. Major customers are resellers, agricultural users, manufacturing industries, public utilities and transports, as well as final users (transporters, condominiums, farmers, fishers, etc.).

74


Eni provides its customers with its expertise in the area of fuels with a wide range of products that cover all market requirements. Along with traditional products provided with the high quality Eni standard, there is also an innovative low environmental impact line, which includes AdvanceDiesel especially targeted for heavy duty public and private transports. Customer care and product distribution is supported by a widespread commercial and logistical organization presence all over Italy and articulated in local marketing offices and a network of agents and concessionaires.

In 2008 volumes marketed on the wholesale market in Italy, were approximately 11.15 mmtonnes up 0.06 mmtonnes from 2007, or 0.5%, mainly reflecting an increase in market bunker consumption on the and fuel oil sales. Sales2009, sales volumes on wholesale markets outsidein Italy (9.56 mmtonnes) were 4.82down 1.59 mmtonnes upfrom 2008, or 14.3%, mainly reflecting a decrease in demand for jet fuel, the bunkering market and fuel oil for power generation, as well as in gasoil sales due to lower industrial consumption reflecting the economic downturn. Sales on wholesale markets in the rest of Europe (3.66 mmtonnes) decreased by approximately 430280 ktonnes, from 2007, or 9.8%7.1% (excluding the impact of asset divestments in the Iberian Peninsula), mainly in Germany, in the Czech Republic and Switzerland due to declining consumption in particular of gasoil for heating.

Supplies of feedstock to the petrochemical industry (1.33 mmtonnes) declined by approximately 370 ktonnes due to declining demand. Other sales (18.61 mmtonnes) decreased by approximately 1.17 mmtonnes, or 5.9%, mainly due to lower sales volumes to trader and oil companies, as well as the growth inreduction of volumes sold to the Czech and Swiss markets, offset by declines in Spain, Austria, France and Germany.cargo market, also due to lower refining throughputs.

Eni also markets jet fuel directly at 46 airports, of which 27 are in Italy. In 2008,2009, these sales amounted to 2.41.8 mmtonnes (of which 1.91.4 mmtonnes are in Italy).

Eni is also active also in the international market of bunkering, marketing marine fuel mainly in 40 ports, of which 23 are in Italy. In 20082009 marine fuel sales were 2.42.1 mmtonnes (2.3(2.0 mmtonnes in Italy). Other sales were 21.3619.85 mmtonnes of which 19.6618.51 mmtonnes referred to sales to oil companies and traders, and 1.701.33 mmtonnes of supplies to the petrochemical sector.

LPG

In Italy, Eni is leader in LPG production, marketing and sale with 566575 ktonnes sold for heating and automotive use (under the Agip brand and wholesale) equal to a 17.8%18% market share. Additional 234An additional 227 ktonnes of LPG were marketed through other channels mainly to oil companies and traders.

LPG activities in Italy are supported by direct production, availability from 5 bottling plants and 4 owned storage sites, in addition to products imported at coastal storage sites located in Livorno, Naples and Ravenna.

In order to expand its presence on the marketplace, in the medium term Eni plans to increase the number of service stations providing dispensers for LPG for automotive use, targeting an increase market share to 26% by 2013.

Lubricants

Eni operates 7 (owned and co-owned) blending plants, in Italy, Europe, North and South America and the Far East. With a wide range of products composed of over 650 different blends Eni masters international state of the-art know-how for the formulation of products for vehicles (engine oil, special fluids and transmission oils) and industries (lubricants for hydraulic systems, industrial machinery and metal processing).

In Italy, Eni is leader in the manufacture and sale of lubricant bases. Base oils are manufactured primarily at EniEni’s refinery in Livorno. Eni also owns one facility for the production of additives and solvents in Robassomero.

In 2008,2009, retail and wholesale sales in Italy amounted to 12593 ktonnes with a 24.8%23.3% market share. Eni also sold approximately 54 ktonnes of special products (white oils, transformer oil and anti-freeze fluids). Outside Italy sales amounted to approximately 111102 ktonnes, of these about 50%70% were registered in Europe (mainly Spain, Germany, and France).

Oxygenates

Eni, through its subsidiary Ecofuel (Eni’s interest 100%), sells approximately 2 mmtonnes/y of oxygenates mainly ethers (approximately 10%7% of world demand) and methanol (approximately 1.5% of world demand). About 72%

75


77% of products are manufactured in Italy in Eni’s plants in Ravenna, in Venezuela (in joint venture with Pequiven) and Saudi Arabia (in joint venture with Sabic), and the remaining 28%23% is bought and resold.

In 2008 Eni started distributingalso distributes bio-ETBE on the Italian market in compliance with the new legislation indicating the minimum content of bio-fuels. Bio-ETBE is a kind of MTBE that gained a relevant position in the formulation of gasoline in the European Union, due to the fact that it is produced from ethanol from agricultural crops and qualified as bio-component in the European directive on bio-fuels. World market for ETBE is currently limited to the European Union and Japan and in 2008 was estimated to amount to 2.2 mmtonnes.

68


Capital Expenditures

See "Item 5 – Liquidity and Capital Resources – Capital Expenditures by Segment".

 

 

Engineering & Construction

Eni operates in engineering, construction and drilling both offshore and onshore for the oil & gas industry through Saipem, a subsidiary listed on the Italian Stock Exchange (Eni’s interest is 43%). Saipem boasts a strong position in the relevant market leveraging on technological and operational skills mainly in frontier areas, harsh environments and complex projects, as well as on engineering and project management capabilities and ownership or availability of necessary technologies as a result of a challenging internal (investments on offshore fleet) and alsoexternal (acquisition of Bouygues Offshore and Snamprogetti) growth process. Management expects to further strengthen Saipem’s competitive position in the medium term, leveraging on its integrationbusiness model articulated across various market sectors combined with Snamprogetti.a strong competitive position in frontier areas, which are traditionally less exposed to the cyclical nature of this market. In spite of a weaker scenario in the oil industry worldwide and the uncertainty of the changed economic context,particular Saipem plans to continue consolidating its position in onshore and offshore markets, completing the expansion of its construction and drilling fleet.

Saipem plans to achieve these objectives implementingimplement the following strategic guidelines: (i) to maximize the efficiency in all business areas with the aim in particular to maintain top execution and security standards, preserve competitive supply costs, optimize the utilization rate of the fleet, preserve competitive supply costs and increase structure flexibility in order to mitigate the effects of negative business cycles;cycles as well as develop and promote a company culture that will permit the identification and management of risks and business opportunities; (ii) to consolidatecontinue to focus on the Company’s competitive position in large offshoremore complex and onshoredifficult projects for the development of hydrocarbon fields strengthening at the same time its market share in the strategic segments of deepwater, FPSO, heavy crude upgrading and LNG (offshore and onshore, for the gas monetization;monetization) upgrading; (iii) to promote local content in terms of employment of local contractors and assets in strategic countries where large projects are carried out supporting the development of delocalized logistic hubs and construction yards when requested by clients in order to achieve a long-term consolidation of its market position in those countries; (iv) to leverage on the capacity to execute internally more phases of large projects on an EPC and EPIC basis, pursuing better control of costs and terms of execution adapting with flexibility to clients’ needs, thus expanding the Company’s value proposition; and (v) to complete the expansion and revamping program of its construction and drilling fleet in consideration of the future needs of the Oil & Gas Industry, in order to confirm the Company’s leading position in the segment of complex projects with high profitability.

Saipem expects to invest approximately euro 3.93 billion over the next four years to further expand the operational features, the dimension and the geographical reach and operational features of its fleet as well as to support the activities related to the execution of projects in portfolio and the acquisition of new orders.

76


Orders acquired in 20082009 amounted to euro 13,8609,917 million, of these projects 79% are to be carried out outside Italy, represented 94%, while orders from Eni companies amounted to 4%represented 32% of the total. Order backlog was euro 18,730 million as of December 31, 2009 (euro 19,105 million atas of December 31, 2008 (euro 15,390 million at December 31, 2007)2008). Projects to be carried out outside Italy represented 98%93% of the total order backlog, while orders from Eni companies amounted to 13%22% of the total.

  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
Orders acquired and breakdown by business (euro million) 11,172 11,845 13,860
Offshore construction   3,681 3,496 4,381
Onshore construction   4,923 6,070 7,522
Offshore drilling   2,230 1,644 760
Onshore drilling   338 635 1,197
Originated by Eni companies (%) 24 16 4
To be carried out outside Italy (%) 91 95 94
Order backlog and breakdown by business (euro million) 13,191 15,390 19,105
Offshore construction   4,283 4,215 4,682
Onshore construction   6,285 7,003 9,201
Offshore drilling   2,247 3,471 3,759
Onshore drilling   376 701 1,463
Originated by Eni companies (%) 20 22 13
To be carried out outside Italy (%) 90 95 98



  

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
Orders acquired (euro million) 11,845 13,860 9,917
Offshore construction   3,496 4,381 5,089
Onshore construction   6,070 7,522 3,665
Offshore drilling   1,644 760 585
Onshore drilling   635 1,197 578
Originated by Eni companies (%) 16 4 32
To be carried out outside Italy (%) 95 94 79
Order backlog and breakdown by business (euro million) 15,390 19,105 18,730
Offshore construction   4,215 4,682 5,430
Onshore construction   7,003 9,201 8,035
Offshore drilling   3,471 3,759 3,778
Onshore drilling   701 1,463 1,487
Originated by Eni companies (%) 22 13 22
To be carried out outside Italy (%) 95 98 93
    
 
 

Business areas

Offshore construction

Saipem is well positioned in the market of large, complex projects for the development of offshore hydrocarbon fields leveraging on its technical and operational skills, supported by a technologically-advanced fleet, the ability to operate in complex environments, and engineering and project management capabilities acquired on the marketplace over recent years. Saipem intends to consolidate its market share strengthening its EPIC oriented

69


business model and leveraging on its satisfactory long-term relationships with the major oil companies and National Oil Companies ("NOCs"). Higher levels of efficiency and flexibility are expected to be achieved by outsourcingreaching the management of EPC projectstechnological excellence and non core engineering activities in cost efficient areas reachingthe highest economies of scale in its engineering hubs and employing local resources in contexts where this represents a competitive advantage, directly managing offshoreintegrating in its own business model the direct management of construction processesprocess through the creation of a large construction yard in South-East Asia and revamping/upgrading its construction fleet. Over the next years, Saipem will invest in the upgrading of its fleet, by building a pipelayer, a field development ship for deepwater, an FPSO and other supporting assets for offshore activity.

Saipem’s offshore construction fleet is made up of 2833 vessels and 45a large number of robotized vehicles able to perform advanced sub-sea operations. Its major vessels are: (i) the Saipem 7000 semi-submersible dynamic positioned vessel, with 14 ktonnes of lift capacity, capable to lay pipelines using the J-lay technique to the maximum depth of 3,000 meters; (ii) the Saibos FDSField Development Ship for the development of underwater fields in dynamic positioning, provided with cranes lifting up to 600 tonnes and a system for J-lay pipe laying to a depth of 2,000 meters; (iii) the Castoro 6 semi-submersible vessel, capable of laying pipes in waters up to 1,000 meters deep; (iv) the Saipem 3000 multifunction vessel for the development of hydrocarbon fields, able to lay rigid and flexible pipes and provided with cranes capable of lifting over 2 ktonnes; and (v) the Semac semi-submersible vessel used for large diameter underwater pipe laying. The fleet also includes remotely operated vehicles (ROV), highly sophisticated and advanced underwater robots capable of performing complex interventions in deep waters.

The most significant orders awarded in 20082009 in Offshore construction were: (i) an EPC contract on behalf of Agip KCO as part of the development program of the Kashagan field related to the hook-up and commissioning of offshore facilities, as well as activities to be executed in the Kuryk construction yard in Kazakhstan; (ii) a contract on behalf of Nord Stream AGEni for laying the Nord Stream gas pipeline constituted byconversion of a twin natural gas pipelinetanker into an FPSO (Floating Production Storage and Offloading) vessel that will link Russiahave a storage and Germany across the Baltic Sea. Overallproduction capacity of about 55 BCM/y will be reached when both lines are operational; (ii)700 KBBL/d and 12 KBBL/d, respectively; and (iii) an EPICEPC contract on behalf of Elf Petroleum Nigeria Ltd (Total)Esso Exploration Angola for the construction and installationdevelopment of underwater pipelines andKizomba Satellites Project offshore Angola. The project is related facilities connectingto the Usain offshore oil field to an FPSO unit (Floating Production Storage Offloading); and (iii) a contract on behalf of OLT Offshore LNG Toscana for the FSRU (Floating, Storage and Regasification Unit)connection of the LNG terminal of Livorno throughMavacola and Clochas fields to the conversion of a gas carrier ship moored offshore Tuscany into a floating, storage and regasification unit. The FSRU will have a storage capacity of 137 KCM of LNG and a production capacity of 3.75 BCM/y of natural gas.existing FPSO units.

Onshore construction

In the onshore construction business, Saipem is one of the largest Engineering & Construction operators on turnkey contract base at a worldwide level in the Oil & Gas segment, especially through the acquisition of Snamprogetti. Saipem operates in the construction of plants for hydrocarbon production (extraction, separation,

77


stabilization, collection of hydrocarbons, water injection) and treatment (removal and recovery of sulphursulfur dioxide and carbon dioxide, fractioning of gaseous liquids, recovery of condensates) and in the installation of large onshore transport systems (pipelines, compression stations, terminals). Saipem intends to capturepreserves its own competitiveness through its technology excellence granted by its engineering hubs, its distinctive know-how in the construction of projects in the high-tech market of LNG and the management of large parts of engineering activities in cost efficient areas. In the medium term, underpinning upward trends in the oil service market, Saipem will be focused on taking advantage of the opportunities arising from the market both in the plantsplant and pipeline segment, bysegments leveraging on its solid competitive position in the realization of complex projects in the strategic areas of Middle East/Middle-East, Caspian Area, NorthSea, Northern and WestWestern Africa and Russia. In 2008, leveraging on its distinctive know-how in the gas monetization segment, Saipem has been awarded for the first time the role of main contractor for the construction of a large gas liquefaction plant in Algeria, asserting its reputation as an integrated player, capable of managing large and complex turnkey projects in the high tech market of LNG.

The most significant orders awarded in 20082009 in Onshore construction were: (i) an EPC contract on behalf of the joint venture between Eni and Sonatrach for the construction of a single-train gas liquefaction plant, with a capacity of 4.7 mmtonnes/y of LNG near the Algerian city of Arzew; (ii) an EPC contract on behalf of Saudi Aramcofacilities for the constructiontreatment of three gas/oil separation trains (GOSP, Gas Oil Separation Process) as partnatural gas extracted from the Menzel Ledjmet East field and from the future developments of the ManifaCAFC (Central Area Field Development Program to increase the production capacity of Saudi Arabia by 900 BBL/d; (iii)Complex) in Algeria; (ii) an EPC contract on behalf of Sonatrach for the construction of three LPG production trains withthe GK3-lot 3 gas pipeline that will connect various cities situated in the north-eastern region of Algeria for a total capacitylength of 8 mmCM/d as part of the development of the Hassi Messaoud field in Algeria;approximately 350 kilometers; and (iv)(iii) an EPC contract on behalf of Total Exploration and Production Nigeria LtdQafco for the upgrade of OML 58 Block through the revamping of the existing Flow Station and the construction of a new gas treatment trainurea plant in order to increase gas production to 17.5 mmCM/d.the city of Mesaieed, in Qatar.

Offshore drilling

Saipem is the only engineering and construction contractor that provides also offshore and onshore drilling services to oil companies. In the offshore drilling segment Saipem mainly operates in West Africa, North Sea, Mediterranean Sea and Middle East and boasts significant market positions in the most complex segments of deep and ultra-deep offshore, leveraging on the outstanding technical features of its drilling platforms and vessels, capable of drilling exploration and development wells at a maximum depth of 9,200 meters. In order to better meet industry demands, Saipem is finalizing an upgrading program of its drilling fleet providing it with state-of-art rigs to enhance its role as high quality player capable of operating also in complex and harsh environments. In particular, overin the next four years Saipem intends to build:complete the building of: (i) the Scarabeo 8 and 9, new generation semi-submersible platforms, that have been already rented to be employed in drilling operations in the deep-water of the Barents SeaEni through multi-year contracts; and in the Gulf of Mexico, respectively, initially on behalf of Eni’s upstream activity; (ii) the Perro Negro 6 jack-up to conduct operations in shallow waters; and (iii) the new S12000 drilling ship to perform operations in West Africa on behalf of Total. In parallel, significant investments are plannedongoing to renew and to keep up the production capacity of other fleet equipment (upgrade equipment to the characteristics of projects or to clients needs and purchase of support equipment).

70


Saipem’s offshore drilling fleet consists of 1113 vessels fully equipped for its primary operations and some drilling plants installed on board of fixed offshore platforms. One of its most important offshore drilling vessels is the Saipem 10000, designed to explore and develop hydrocarbon reservoirs operating in excess of 3,000 meters water depth in full dynamic positioning. The ship has a storage capacity of 140,000 BBL and is able to maintain a steady operating position without anchor moorings by means of 6 computerized azimuth thrusters, which offset and correct the effect of wind, waves and current in real time. The vessel is operating in ultra deep waters (over 1,000 meters) in West Africa. Other relevant vessels are Scarabeo 5 and 7, third and fourth generation semi-submersible rigs able to operate at depths of 1,900 and 1,2001,500 meters of water, respectively. Average utilization of drilling vessels in 20082009 stood at 84.7% (94.7%90.0% (100% in 2007)2008).

The most significant contracts awarded in Offshore drilling in 20082009 included: (i) a 5-year3-year extension of the contract for the use of the Scarabeo 75 semi-submersible platform in West AfricaNorway on behalf of Eni;Statoil; (ii) a 2-yearan extension of the contract for the use of semi-submersible platform Scarabeo 3 in Nigeria on behalf of Addax Petroleum; and (iii) a 12-month contract extension for the use of the Scarabeo 6 semi-submersible platform in Egypt on behalf of Burullus Gas Co.Co; and (iii) a 12-month contract (plus an additional 12 months option) for the use of the Perro Negro 6 newly built jack up in Angola on behalf of Sonangol.

Onshore drilling

Saipem operates in this area as a main contractor for the major international oil companies and NOCs executing its activity mainly in South America, Saudi Arabia, North Africa and, at a lower extent, in Europe. In this areasarea Saipem can leverage on its knowledge of the market, long-term relations with customers and synergies and integration with other business areas. Saipem boasts a solid track record in remote areas (in particular in the Caspian Sea), leveraging on its own operational skills and its ability to operate in complex environments.

Average utilization of rigs in 20082009 stood at 99% (99.6%91% (99% in 2007)2008). The 7383 rigs owned by Saipem at year end were located as follows: 30 in Venezuela, 1619 in Peru, 98 in Saudi Arabia, 7 in Algeria, 3 in Kazakhstan, 3 in Brazil, 3 in Italy, 3 in Colombia, 2 in Italy,Ukraine, 2 in Congo, 1 in Ecuador, 1 in ColombiaBolivia and 1 in Egypt.

78


The most significant orders awarded in 20082009 in Onshore drilling were: (i) contractsa contract on behalf of various oil companiesAgip KCO for the lease of 172 rigs in Kazakhstan with an averagea contract duration of five and half years; and (ii) contractsa contract on behalf of various oil companiesthe joint venture between First Calgary Petroleum and Sonatrach in Algeria for the lease of 322 rigs of which 13 new ones, in South America (mainly in Venezuela and Peru) and Ukraine. The averagewith a contract duration was one yearof three years; and (iii) a contract on behalf of Eni in Congo for the existentlease of two rigs and five years for the new ones.with a contract duration of two years.

 

Capital Expenditures

See "Item 5 – Liquidity and Capital Resources – Capital Expenditures by Segment".

 

 

Petrochemicals

Eni operates in the businesses of olefins and aromatics, basic and intermediate products, polystyrene, elastomers and polyethylene. Its major production sites are located in Italy and Western Europe.

Eni’s strategy in its petrochemical business is to effectively and efficiently manage operations in order to lower the break-even considering the volatility of costs of oil-based feedstock, anda weak demand outlook, intense competitive pressures taking into account the commoditized featurenature of many of Eni’s main products. In fact, Eni’s profitability in the petrochemical businesses is particularly sensitive to movements in product margins that are mainly affected by changes in oil-based feedstock costs and the speed at which product prices adjust to higher oil prices, also considering the cyclical nature of demand. See "Item“Item 3 – Risk factors"Factors”. The outlook for 2010 is challenging as management does not expect any significant improvement in industry fundamentals. As a result, weak demand growth, competition and high costs for oil feedstock are forecast to drive down operating results and liquidity in this business. However, management believes there are signs that demand has bottomed-up. Also, the Company will improve results by implementing cost efficiencies. The Company does not expect to incur significant amount of expenditures to develop this business. In futurethe next four years, management forecastforecasts a yearly level of expenditures in line with 2008of approximately euro 220 million per annum mainly targeted to upgradeupgrading plant efficiency, execute de-bottlenecking interventions andselectively expanding capacity in order to complyimprove the product-mix, as well as complying with all applicable regulations on environment, health and safety issues.

In 20082009, sales of petrochemical products (4,684(4,265 ktonnes) decreased by 829419 ktonnes from 2007, down 15%,2008, or 8.9% due to the economic downturn, especially in all business areas asthe automotive sector, that negatively influenced demand for petrochemical products.

Petrochemical production (6,521 ktonnes) decreased by 851 ktonnes from 2008, or 11.5% due to a result of lower petrochemicalsteep decline in demand for petrochemical products due to a negative market scenario.

Petrochemical production (7,372 ktonnes) decreased by 1,423 ktonnes from 2007, or 16.2%. In a context of economic downturn,in all business. The general demand decrease in the steep declinechemical industry, in unit margins and sales determinedparticular for commodities, required unexpected outages in a number of some plants in particular inorder to avoid excess stocks. Relevant production decreases were registered at the last partPorto Torres plant (down 51%), as result of the year.shutdown of the phenol plant at the beginning of the year and of reduced production for commercial reasons.

NominalIn the 2009, the nominal production capacity decreased by approximately 2 percentage points3.3% from 2007,2008 due to the shutdown of the Gela cracker.cracker and the Porto Torres phenol plant. The average plant utilization rate, calculated on nominal capacity decreased from 68.6% to 65.4% due to reduced production.

The average unit sale prices in 2009 decreased by 12 percentage

71


points26% from 80.6% to 68.6%,2008. The steeper decreases affected the prices of the main petrochemical products (olefins were down 35%) due to the current economic downturn that entailed reductions in production in all main plants.

Approximately 49.5%negative impact of total production was directed to Eni’s own productions cycle (48.9% in 2007). Oil based feedstock supplied by Eni’s Refining & Marketing segment covered 24% of requirements (21% in 2007).

Prices of Eni’s main petrochemical products increased on average by 7%, increasing in the business of: (i) olefins (up 13%) with increases in all products; (ii) elastomers (up 10%), in particular polybutadienic and nytrilic rubbers; and (iii) polyethylene (up 5%), in particular EVA. However, these prices increases did not made for higher purchase costs of oil-based feedstockoil price scenario (virgin naphtha was up 17.3%down 32.3% from 2008). Average unit prices of polymers, in dollar terms, 9.3%particular elastomers (down 17%) decreased less, due to a slower adjustment to the oil scenario and to expected price increases in euro), particularly until September, and as a result product margins significantly decreased from a year ago.2010.

79


The table below sets forth Eni’s main petrochemical products availability for the periods indicated.

 

Year ended December 31,

  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
 (ktonnes)
Olefins 2,950  3,490  2,819 
Aromatics 772  938  767 
Intermediates 553  1,260  977 
Styrene 1,088  1,117  1,018 
Elastomers 457  515  494 
Polyethylene 1,252  1,475  1,297 
Total production 7,072  8,795  7,372 
Consumption of monomers (2,488) (4,304) (3,652)
Purchases and change in inventories 692  1,022  964 
  5,276  5,513  4,684 
  

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
  


(ktonnes)

Basic petrochemicals 6,274  5,110  4,350 
Polymers 2,521  2,262  2,171 
  

 

 

Total production 8,795  7,372  6,521 
  

 

 

Consumption of monomers (4,099) (3,539) (2,701)
Purchases and change in inventories 816  851  445 
  5,513  4,684  4,265 
  

 

 

The table below sets forth Eni’s sales of main petrochemical products by volumerevenues for the periods indicated.

 

Year ended December 31,

  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
 (ktonnes)
Olefins 1,699  1,797  1,423 
Aromatics 530  514  420 
Intermediates 654  712  576 
Styrene 587  594  543 
Elastomers 412  447  433 
Polyethylene 1,394  1,449  1,289 
Total sales 5,276  5,513  4,684 
  

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
  


(euro million)

Basic petrochemicals 3,582 3,060 1,832
Polymers 3,109 2,961 2,185
Other revenues 243 282 186
  
 
 
Total revenues 6,934 6,303 4,203
  
 
 

OlefinsBasic petrochemicals

Olefins sales (1,423 ktonnes)Basic petrochemical revenues (euro 1,832 million) decreased by 374 ktonneseuro 1,228 million from 2007 (down 20.8%2008 (or 40.1%), penalized by a poorer market scenario that negatively affected product demand and lower product availability. Main reductions were registered in sales of ethylene (down 30%), butadiene (down 30.3%) and propylene (down 15%).

Olefins production (2,819 ktonnes) declined by 671 ktonnes from 2007, or 19.2%,all the main business segments due to the maintenance shutdownsteep reduction in average unit prices (ranging from 25% to 35%) related to the prices of main petrochemical products, and to a lower extent to the Priolo cracker, technical problems at the Brindisidecrease in sales volumes.

In particular olefins and Dunkerque plants, steep demand reduction and the shutdown of the Gela cracker.

Aromatics and intermediates

Aromaticsaromatics sales (420 ktonnes)volumes decreased by 94 ktonnes from 2007 (down 18.3%) due to lower demand for isomers (down 33%)8% and 10.5%, mainlyrespectively, with a slight increase in the second partlast quarter of the year.2009. Intermediates sales (576 ktonnes) decreased by 136 ktonnes from 2007volumes continued to report a negative performance (down 19.1%34%) mainly due to temporaryas a result of lower product availability because of the shutdown of the Porto Torres crackerplant as a result of the poorer market scenario that negatively affected demand. Main decreases were registered in phenol (down 30.6%) and cyclohexanone (down 6.4%).unfavorable scenario.

72


AromaticsBasic petrochemicals production (767(4,350 ktonnes) decreased by 171760 ktonnes from 2007 (down 18.2%2008 (or 14,9%), in line with lower demand of monomers.

Polymers

Polymer revenues (euro 2,185 million) decreased by euro 776 million, or 26.2%, from 2008, mainly due to price reduction.

Sales volumes of polyethylene decreased by 1.3% in spite of a slight demand increase registered in the maintenance shutdownlast months of the Priolo crackeryear. Styrene sales achieved a stable performance and compact polystyrene sales increased by 2.5% from 2008. Sales decreases mainly in elastomers (down 7%) due to a greater impact of industrial sectors affected by the temporary shutdown of the Porto Torres plant.economic downturn (mainly automotive).

IntermediatesPolymers production (977(2,171 ktonnes) decreased by 28391 ktonnes from 2007 (down 22.5%2008 (or 4%), which is consistent with sales trends.

In 2009, the production volumes of styrene and polyethylene decreased by 3% compared to 2008 mainly due to the shutdown of the Porto Torres plant.

Styrene and elastomers

Styrene sales (543 ktonnes) declined Elastomers production decreased by 51 ktonnes from 2007 (down 8.6%). Sales reductions affected essentially compact polystyrene (down 13%) and ABS/SAN (down 13.2%)8.8% as a result of plants outages, mainly in the first months of 2009 due to lower demand. Increasesdemand from industries, in styrene (up 9.8%) and expanded polystyrene (up 5.6%) were due to higher product availability.

Elastomers sales (433 ktonnes) decreased by 14 ktonnes, or 3.1%, due to a steep decline in demand in the last part of the year, mainly inparticular the automotive sector. Sales decreases were registered mainly in lattices (down 11%), NBR (down 9.5%) and polybutadienic rubbers (down 4%). Increases recorded in thermoplastic rubbers (up 6.3%) and SBR (up 3.4%) were due to higher product availability.

Styrene production (1,018 ktonnes) decreased by 99 ktonnes, or 8.9%.80

Elastomer production (494 ktonnes) decreased by 21 ktonnes (down 4.1%) due to maintenance shutdown of the Ravenna plant and unexpected outages of the Porto Torres and Ferrara plants.

Polyethylene

Polyethylene sales (1,289 ktonnes) were down 160 ktonnes or 11%, from 2007, reflecting mainly negative market conditions for LPDE (down 19.4%) and HDPE (down 11.4%).

Production (1,297 ktonnes) decreased by 178 ktonnes, or 12.1%, due to the maintenance shutdown of the Gela, Ragusa and Priolo plants and the temporary shutdown of Porto Torres and Dunkerque plants reflecting lower demand. EVA production increased by 8% due to the fact that 2007 was impacted by the outage of Oberhausen plant.


Capital Expenditures

See "Item 5 – Liquidity and Capital Resources – Capital Expenditures by Segment".

 

 

Corporate and Other activities

These activities include the following businesses:

 the "Other activities" segment only encompassescomprises results of operations of Eni’s subsidiary Syndial which runs minor petrochemical activities and reclamation and decommissioning activities pertaining to certain businesses which Eni exited, divested or shut down in past years; and
 the "Corporate and financial companies" segment encompasses Eni Corporatecomprises results of operations of Eni’s headquarter and certain Eni’s subsidiaries engaged in treasury, finance and other general and business support services. Eni CorporateEni’s headquarter is a department of the parent company Eni SpA and performs Group strategic planning, human resources management, finance, administration, information technology, legal affairs, international affairs and corporate research and development functions. Through SofidEni’s subsidiaries Eni Adfin SpA, Eni International BV and Eni Insurance Ltd, Eni carries out lending, factoring, leasing, financing Eni’s projects around the world and insurance activities, principally on an intercompanyinter-company basis. EniServizi, Eni Corporate University, AGI and other minor subsidiaries are engaged in providing Group companies with diversified services (mainly services including training, business support, real estate and general purposes services to Group’s companies).

Management does not consider Eni’s activities in these areas to be material to its overall operations.

 

Seasonality

Eni’s results of operations reflect the seasonality in demand for natural gas and certain refined products used in residential space heating, the demand for which is typically highest in the first quarter of the year, which includes the coldest months and lowest in the third quarter, which includes the warmest months. Moreover, year-to-year comparability of results of operations is affected by weather conditions affecting demand for gas and other refined products in residential space heating. In colder years that are characterized by lower temperatures than historical

73


average temperatures, demand for gas and products is typically higher than normal consumption patterns, and vice versa.

 

Research and Development

Technological research and innovation represent key factors in implementing Eni’s business strategies. Eni’s efforts in technological innovation are primarily intended to develop such technologies so as to meet the environmental issues and climate change, to overcome limits in accessing to hydrocarbon resources, to strengthen partnerships with producing countries and to develop renewable sources of energy.

Eni is committed to developing advanced upstream technologies in frontiers areas with environmental and geological complex features,issues, reducing the costs of finding and recovering hydrocarbons, upgrading heavy oils, monetizing stranded gas and protecting the environment. Over the next four years, Eni plans to invest euro 1.11.4 billion to fund ongoing projects in Eni’s businesses as well as research in the field of renewable energy which could result in potential break-through technologies. Particularly in the next four years Eni plans to fund euro 102 million to "Along with Petroleum" program aimed at identifying and developing research projects on the most advanced aspectsalternatives sources of large scale use of renewable energy sources and energy efficiency.energy.

In 2008,2009, Eni’s expenditures on R&D amounted to euro 217207 million which were almost entirely expensed as incurred (euro 208217 million and euro 220208 million in 2008 and 2007, and 2006)respectively).

AtAs of December 31, 2008,2009, a total of 1,0981,019 people were employed in research and development activities.

In 2008,2009, a total of 96106 applications for patents were filed.

 

Insurance

Eni constantly assesses its exposure for the Italian and foreign activities that are mainly covered through the Oil Insurance Ltd ("OIL"), a mutual insurance and reinsurance company that provides its members a broad coverage tailored to the specific requirements of oil and energy companies. Eni makes use of a captive insurance company

81


that covers the risks and implements Eni’s Worldwide Insurance Program re-insured with high quality securities in order to integrate the terms and conditions of the OIL coverage.

An insurance risk manager works in close contact with managers directly involved in core business activities in order to evaluate potential risks and their financial impact on the Group. This process allows Eni to define a constant level of risk retention and, conversely, the amount of risk to be transferred to the market.

The level of insurance maintained by Eni is generally appropriate for the risks of its businesses.

 

Environmental Matters

Environmental Regulation

Eni is subject to numerous EU, international, national, regional and local environmental, health and safety laws and regulations concerning its oil and gas operations, products and other activities, including legislation that implements international conventions or protocols. In particular, these laws and regulations require the acquisition of a permit before drilling for hydrocarbons may commence, restrict the types, quantities and concentration of various substances that can be released into the environment in connection with exploration, drilling and production activities, limit or prohibit drilling activities on certain protected areas, provide for measures to be taken to protect the safety of the workplace and health of communities affected by the company’s activities, and impose criminal or civil liabilities for pollution resulting from oil, natural gas, refining and petrochemical operations. These laws and regulations may also restrict emissions and discharges to surface and subsurface water resulting from the operation of natural gas processing plants, petrochemical plants, refineries, pipeline systems and other facilities that Eni owns. In addition, Eni’s operations are subject to laws and regulations relating to the production, handling, transportation, storage, disposal and treatment of waste materials. Environmental laws and regulations have a substantial impact on Eni’s operations. Some risk of environmental costs and liabilities is inherent in certain operations and products of Eni, and there can be no assurance that material costs and liabilities will not be incurred.

A brief description of major environmental laws impacting Eni’s activities located in Italy and Europe is outlined below.

74


Italy

On April 29, 2006, Legislative Decree No. 152/2006 "Environment Regulation" came into force. This was designed to rationalize and coordinate the whole regulation of environmental matters by setting:

procedures for Strategic Environment Assessment (SEA), Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Integrated Pollution Prevention and Pollution Control (IPPC);
procedures for Strategic Environment Assessment (SEA), Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Integrated Pollution Prevention and Pollution Control (IPPC);
 procedures to preserve soil, prevent desertification, effectively manage water resources and protect water from pollution;
 procedures to effectively manage waste and remediate contaminated sites;
 air protection and reduction of atmospheric pollution; and
 environmental liability.

The most important changes introduced by the Decree regarded reclamation and remediation activities as this Decree provided a site-specific risk-based approach to determine objectives of reclamation and remediation projects, cost-effective analysis required to evaluate remediation solutions, criteria for waste classification.

The Decree 152/2006 was amended by two subsequent decrees: Legislative Decrees 284/2006 and 4/2008; the latter introduced important changes regarding SEA and EIA procedures, landfill, waste and remediation. A principle of waste hierarchy was introduced along with definition of by-product and secondary raw materials.

The most important aspects of these regulations to Eni are those regulating permits for industrial activities, waste management, remediation of polluted sites, water protection and environmental liability.

On June 19, 2009, the Law 69/2009 starts to a consultation process of the association’s parties in order to simplify and amend the Legislative Decree No. 152/2006. The process should be completed by June 2010.

A new regulation is expected in the waste sector by 2010, when the competent authority will adopt an innovative informatics system, named SISTRI, which will be able to control and track waste transfer at the national level.

82


On April 9, 2008, Legislative Decree No. 81/2008 "Implementation of Article 1 of Law 123/2007, in matter of protection of the health and the security on the working places" came into force. This was designed to rationalize and coordinate working environments, the equipments and the Individual Protection Devices, the physical agents (noise, mechanical vibrations, electromagnetic fields, optical radiations, etc.), the dangerous substance (chemical agents, carcinogenic substances, etc.), the biological agents and explosive atmosphere, the system of signs, the video terminals.

In August 2009 the Legislative Decree No. 81/2008 was amended and corrected with the Legislative Decree No. 106/2009. By 2008 Eni worked on the implementation of the general framework regulations on health and safety contained in this Legislative Decree No. 81/2008 and No. 106/2009, developing all laws and regulations concerning prevention and protection of workers at national and European level to be applied for all kinds of workers and employees.

At the European level, Eni continued its work for applying the REACH Regulation (Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals, EC Regulation No. 197/2006).

The complexity and range of situations where Eni is operating imposed the definition and application of principles for consolidating its performance in health and prevention. To this end Eni upholds:

 clear policies;
 an ethical code;
 endorsement of international conventions and principles;
 guidelines and procedures; and
 sharing of knowledge.

European Union

On January 23, 2008 the European Commission put forward a far-reaching package of proposals that will deliver on the European Union’s ambitious commitments to fight climate change, promote renewable energy and increase energy security (new Energy Policy for Europe - EPE, so called "20-20 by 2020"). In December 2008 the European Parliament and Council reached an agreement on the package.

The EU is committed On June 5, 2009, the following regulations were published in order to reducing its overall emissions to at least 20% below 1990 levels by 2020, and is ready to scale up this reduction to as much as 30% under a new global climate change agreement when other developed countries make comparable efforts. It has also set itselfdefine the target of increasing the share of renewables in energy use to 20% by 2020.

Central to the strategy is a strengthening and expansion of the Emissions Trading System (EU ETS), the EU’s key toolcriteria for cutting emissions cost-effectively. Emissions from the sectors covered by the system (energy and manufacturing industries) will be cut by 21%cost-effectively by 2020 compared with levels in 2005. A single EU-wide cap on ETS emissions will be set, and free allocation of emission allowances will be progressively replaced by auctioning of allowances by 2020.2005:

75


Emissions from sectors not included in the EU ETS – such as transport, housing, agriculture and waste – will be cut by 10% from 2005 levels by 2020. Each Member State will contribute to this effort according to its relative wealth, with national emission targets ranging from -20% for richer Member States to +20% for poorer ones.

The Directive sets legally binding targets for each Member State, in order to reach the EU target of a 20% share of renewable energy in 2020. It creates cooperation mechanisms so that the EU can achieve the targets in a cost effective way. It also includes a flat 10% target for renewables in transport (biofuels, "green" electricity, etc.); this legislation also sets out sustainability criteria that biofuels will have to meet to ensure they deliver real environmental benefits.

The package also seeks to promote the development and safe use of Carbon Capture & Storage (CCS), a suite of technologies that allows the carbon dioxide emitted by industrial processes to be captured and stored underground where it cannot contribute to global warming. The reinforced carbon market will provide a long-term incentive for investment, while up to 300 million allowances in the new entrants reserve under the EU ETS will be made available to stimulate the construction and operation of up to 12 commercial demonstration CCS projects, and for innovative renewable energy demonstration technologies in the EU.

The fuel quality Directive will place an obligation on suppliers to reduce greenhouse gases from the entire life cycle of the fuel 6% by 2020, mostly by an increased use of biofuels. A review in 2012 will consider increasing the target to 10%, through the inclusion of international projects, carbon capture and storage as well as electricity for cars.

Also a new regulation was approved to set emissions standards for new passenger cars, which is an important tool to assist Member States in meeting their emissions targets in the non-ETS sectors. It will set binding emissions targets to ensure that emissions from the new car fleet will be reduced to an average of 120g CO2/km by 2015, including the effect of the Fuel Quality Directive, then decreasing to a stringent long-term target of 95g CO2/km by 2020.

Directive 2009/28/CE: fix target of 20% share of renewable energy in 2020. It creates cooperation mechanisms so that the EU can achieve the targets in a cost effective way. It also includes a flat 10% target for renewables in transport (biofuels, "green" electricity, etc.); this legislation also sets out sustainability criteria that biofuels should meet to ensure they deliver real environmental benefits.
Directive 2009/29/CE: defines criteria and targets for cutting GHG emissions from the sectors covered by the system (energy and manufacturing industries) by 21% by 2020 compared with levels in 2005.
Directive 2009/30/CE: defines the fuel quality and places an obligation on suppliers to reduce greenhouse gases from the entire fuel life cycle of 6% by 2020, mostly by an increased use of biofuels.
Directive 2009/31/CE: defines a scenario in order to promote the development and safe use of Carbon Capture & Storage (CCS), a suite of technologies that allows the carbon dioxide emitted by industrial processes to be captured and stored underground.
Regulation 443/2009/CE: sets emissions standards for new passenger cars, which is an important tool to support Member States in meeting their emissions targets in the non-ETS sectors. The regulation defines binding emissions targets to ensure that emissions from the new car fleet will be reduced to an average of 120 g CO2/km by 2015, including the effect of the Fuel Quality Directive, then decreasing to a stringent long-term target of 95 g CO2/km by 2020.
Decision 406/2009/CE: defines, for sectors not included in the EU ETS, such as transport, housing, agriculture and waste, emissions reduction target of 10% from 2005 levels by 2020 (the Italian reduction target is fixed at 13%).

On January 29, 2008, the new IPPC (Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control) Directive 2008/1/EC was published in the Official Journal of the European Union No. 24. Therefore, from February 18, 2008, the new IPPC directive repeals the Directive 96/61/EC with its successive amendments. This directive rationalizes all existing regulations on this issue, confirming the achievement of high levels of environmental protection to be of primary importance to member states.

Sites specific Environment Integrated Authorizations are released by the Competent Authority to the single operator. The IPPC installations of Eni have obtained most of their authorizations during 2009 and the release process it’s expected to be completed by 2010.

According to the IPPC Directive, the Member States of the EU have to communicate their national values of emissions into the atmosphere, wastes produced and managed and discharges of compounds into waste. The

83


European Commission published in Official Journal of European Union, May 16, 2007 (2007/C 110/01) the definitive replacement of the European Pollutant Emission Register (EPER) by the European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register (E-PRTR), published in 2006 (Regulation No. 166/2006).

In 2008 Italian legislation already required from the IPPC site owners to account and report environmental data related to 2007 according to PRTR Register as requested by the Regulation.

By March 2010, Eni is implementingwill complete the implementation of an Integrated Environmental Information System, able to gather, manage and report the data on all the pollutants released and off-site transferred as requested by PRTR Regulations.

On December 21, 2007, the European Commission published its proposal of directive on Industrial Emissions. In view of the general call for "better regulation", the draft incorporates the reviews of six sector-specific directives (IPPC, Large Combustion Plants, VOC - Volatile Organic Compounds - emissions, incineration of waste and titanium industry). The proposed directive intends to enforce BAT definition, together with a tightening of current minimum emission values in some sectors. The directive extends the scope of the IPPC directive to cover certain activities (e.g. combustion plants between 20 and 50 MW). The new proposal introduces also more robust monitoring and inspections on installations, the review of permit conditions and the reporting of compliance. The proposal reaches the 1° reading phase on December 2009 and the consultation process is planning to end by June 2010.

On November 22, 2008, the new Directive on waste (Directive 2008/98/EC) was published in the Official Journal of the European Union. The new Directive simplifies the existing legislative framework by clarifying definitions, streamlining provisions and integrating the directives on hazardous waste (91/689/EEC) and on waste oils (75/439/EEC). The Directive introduces a life-cycle approach, focuses on waste policy by improving the way of resources consumption. The scope is to improve the recycling market by setting environmental standards, specifying under which conditions certain recycled waste are no longer considered such. The Directive requires that Member States take appropriate measures to encourage the prevention or reduction of waste production and its harmfulness. This can be done by a combination of several strategies. Especially mentioned are the development of clean technologies, the technical development and marketing of products designed so to contribute as little as possible to increasing the amount of waste. The Directive also sets new recycling targets.

Core of the Directive is the introduction of a waste management hierarchy. This hierarchy is as follows: 1. Waste prevention, 2. Re-use, 3. Recycling, 4. Recovery (including energy recovery), 5. Disposal.

76


Moreover the Directive bolsters the importance of the extended producer responsibility in the future waste management measures.

The Member States will have to transpose this Directive into national legislation until December 12, 2010.

 

HSE Activity for the Year 20082009

Eni is committed to continuously improve its model for managing health, safety and environment across all its own operational activitiesbusinesses in order to minimize risks associated with its industrial activities, ensure reliability of its industrial operations and comply with all applicable rules and regulations.

In 2008,2009, Eni’s business units continued to obtain certifications of their management systems, industrial installations and operating units according to the most stringent international standards.

In 2008, the The total number of certifications obtainedachieved was 329 (248345 (330 in 2007)2008), of which 123125 certifications according to the ISO 14001 standard, 1110 certifications according to the EMAS regulation (EMAS is the Environmental Management and Audit Scheme recognized by the European Union) and 5161 according to the OHSAS 18001 standard (Occupational Health and Safety management Systems - - requirements).

EnvironmentEnvironment.. In 2008,2009, Eni incurred total expenditures amounting to euro 1,0811,324 million for the protection of environment, up 1.7%23% from 2007.2008. Current environmental expenses decreasedincreased by approximately 9%1.4% from 2007,2008, and mainly related to costs incurred with respect to remediation and reclamation activities, carried out mainly in Italy. Capitalized environmental expenditure increased by 22%51% and mainly related to soil and subsoil protection water management and air emissions. Eni expects to continue incurring amount of environmental expenditures and expenses in line with or above 2009 levels in future years.

Safety.Safety. The safety of Eni’sour employees and contractors as well of its contractors and the one of theall people living in the area where its activities and assets are located is of fundamental importanceimportant to the Company.

As to safety regulations, in 2008our company. In year 2009, the Legislative DegreeDecree No. 106/2009 amended and updated Legislative Decree No. 81/2008 onregarding health and safety in workplaces came into force. This decree meaningfully increases and substantially better clarified

84


the responsibilityresponsibilities of companies for violatingwho violate said applicable laws regulatingand terms of monitoring by managers and supervisors.

During 2009, the improvement and dissemination of safety at work, then requiring more severe controls by supervisors and managers.

awareness through all levels of its organization, which is one of the foundations of Eni’s safety strategy, is based on:has been greatly boosted by a large communication campaign with the target of improving the conduct of workers in the specific field of safety at work. The campaign will last two years and will involve 35,000 workers and 25,000 contractors.

the improvement and dissemination of a safety culture through all levels of its organization;
a comprehensive policy, specific guidelines and proper management systems in line with International standards and best practices; and
a risk management system with severe procedures for hazards identification and risk analysis, prevention and mitigation, related to process, products and operations.

In 2008, theResults of efforts to achieve a better safety in all activities has brought an improvement of Eni injury frequency rate was 1.45to 0.99 and of the injury severity rate was 0.05.to 0.041, both decreasing from 2008 and representing the best results ever.

CostCosts incurred in 20082009 to support the safety levels of operations and to comply with applicable rules and regulations were euro 441538 million, down 5.8%up 22% from 2007.2008. Eni expects to continue incurring amounts of expenses for safety which will be in line with or above 2009 levels in future years.

HealthHealth. . Eni’s activities for protecting health aim at the continuous improvement of work conditions. Results have been achieved through:

 efficiency and reliability of plants;
 promotion and dissemination of knowledge, adoption of best practices and operating management systems based on advanced criteria of protection of health and internal and external environment;
 certification programs of management systems for production sites and operating units;
 identified indicators in order to monitor exposure to chemical and physical agents;
 strong engagement in health protection for workers operating outside Italy, identifying international health centers capable of guaranteeing a prompt and adequate response to any emergency;
 identification of an effective organization of health centers, in Italy and abroad; and
 training programs for medics and paramedics.

To protect the health and safety of its employees, Eni relies on a network of 332334 health care centers located in isits main operating areas. A set of international agreements with the best local and international health centers ensures efficient services and timely responses to emergencies.

In 20082009 Eni incurred a total expense of euro 68.680.7 million, up 27.5%17.7% from 20072008 to protect the health of its employees. Eni expects to continue incurring amounts of expenses for health which will be in line with or above 2009 levels in future years.

77


Managing GHG emissions and Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol

On February 16, 2005, the Kyoto Protocol entered into force and, with it, the commitments of the Annex I Parties which have ratified the Protocol, including the EU and Italy. According to Law No. 120/2002, Italy committed itself to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 6.5% in the period 2008-2012, as compared to GHG levels emitted in 1990. Reductions can be achieved through both internal measures and complementary initiatives.

The latter include the so-called flexible mechanisms, which enables a Party to carry out projects in developing countries (CDM - Clean Development Mechanism) and in industrial countries with transition economies (JI - Joint Implementation) in order to obtain emission credits to fulfill the Kyoto compliance.

Italy as an EU Member State, is part ofa party to the EU Emission Trading Scheme ("ETS"(“ETS”) that was established by Directive 2003/87/EC. Effective from January 1, 2005, ETS is the largest virtual market in the world for exchanging emission allowances targeting industrial installations with high carbon dioxide emissions.

As foreseen by the Directive, Italy has issued two National Allocation Plans (NAP) covering the periods 2005-20072005- 2007 and 2008-2012 which set out the allowances awarded to each sector and installation. Eni is part to the ETS. Moreover, Eni is active in the utilizationmakes use of the Kyoto Flexible Mechanisms. In fact, due to its presence in about 70 countries, Eni is an elective partner for carrying out CDM and JI projects thus contributing to the Italian program of greenhouse gas emissions reduction. In December 2003 during the Conference of Parties to the Kyoto Protocol – COP9 – Eni and the Ministry of the Environment signed a Voluntary Agreement for using flexible mechanisms, promoting CDM and JI and contributing to the sustainable development of host countries.

The ETS EU directive provides that each Member State shall ensure that any operatoroperators who producesproduce GHG emissions in excess of the amounts awarded basedentitled on the base of national allocation plan, will provide allowances to cover excess emissions a year later in additionand also to pay a penalty. The excess emissions penalty shall beamounts to euro 100 (euro 40 for the first period 2005-2007) for each tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent emitted.emitted in excess of entitled amounts. All companies are expected to identify and carry out projects for emission reductions. Eni participates in the ETS scheme with 56 plants in Italy and 4 outside Italy, which collectively represent about a third of all greenhouse gas emissions generated by Eni’s plants worldwide. In the whole period (2005-2007) Eni was entitled to allowances equal to 77.2 mmtonnes of carbon dioxide for existing and new installations (of which 25.7 mmtonnes of carbon dioxide for 2007).

Based on the implementation of projects designed to reduce emissions, particularly the start-up of high efficiency combined cycles for the cogeneration of electricity and steam, the amount of carbon dioxide emitted by Eni’s plants complied with mandatory limits in the whole period.85


Management believes that a significant emission reduction can be achieved in connection with oil and gas production activities outside Italy, that in a number of cases, given lack of local market outlets, require the flaring of natural gas associated to oil production. The elimination of flaring and the use of associated gas for the development of local economies allow sustainable development while reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The validation of such projects as CDM and JI will provide emission credits and facilitate the achievement of the Italian reduction target, as set by the Kyoto Protocol. Eni already carried out Zero Gas Flaring projects in Nigeria and Congo while others are underway.

In November 2006 the Nigerian Kwale-Okpai project has been registered as a CDM project. It regarded the construction of a combined cycle power station, which utilizes the associated gas to oil production formerly flared. More projects are being assessed or implemented in Congo, Nigeria and Angola. Moreover, Eni endorsed the Global Gas Flaring Reduction Initiative of the World Bank, in order to fight for the elimination of obstacles to the completion of gas flaring reduction projects.

The best solutions for compliancecomplying with the Kyoto Protocol are the use of low emission energy sources and the adoption of highly efficient technologies. To address the greenhouse gas challenge, Eni performed a detailed analysis for defining its strategy to respond to climate change and to participate in the European emissions trading system, identifying a number of projects for energy saving and emission reductions from its plants. Eni participates in the ETS scheme with 55 plants in Italy and 4 outside Italy, which collectively represent about a third of all greenhouse gas emissions generated by Eni’s plants worldwide. In the period 2005- 2007 Eni was entitled to allowances equal to 77.2 mmtonnes of carbon dioxide for existing and new installations. In the period 2008-2012 Eni was entitled to allowances equal to 126.4 mmtonnes of carbon dioxide for existing installations and to further 8.6 mmtonnes in relation to new installations for the 2008-2012 period. Based on the implementation of projects designed to reduce emissions, particularly the start-up of high efficiency combined cycles for the cogeneration of electricity and steam, the amount of carbon dioxide emitted by Eni’s plants has complied with mandatory limits in each of the reported periods up to 2009.

Management plans to target reduction of GHG emissions by implementing certain gas projects designed to exploit associated gas in foreign countries where such gas is flared or released in the atmosphere absent local market outlets for that gas. The elimination of flaring and the use of associated gas for the development of local economies allow sustainable development while reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The validation of such projects as CDM and JI will provide emission credits and facilitate the achievement of Italian reduction targets, as set by the Kyoto Protocol. Eni has already carried out Zero Gas Flaring projects in Nigeria and Congo.

More projects are being assessed or implemented in Libya, Congo, Nigeria, Angola and Algeria. Management plans to invest approximately euro 1.1 billion in those projects over the next four years. Moreover, Eni endorsed the Global Gas Flaring Reduction Initiative of the World Bank, in order to fight for the elimination of obstacles to the completion of gas flaring reduction projects. In the period from 2010-2013, a reduction in the trend of Eni total GHG emissions is foreseen due to the planned implementation of the above mentioned projects designed to reduce gas flaring or venting, measures targeting energy efficiency at various Eni’s installations and facilities including refineries, petrochemicals plants and electricity plants, and actions to better manage gas emissions in transport and distribution activities. However, due to new facilities and installations, management believes that Eni’s GHG emissions under the ETs scheme will exceed the entitled allowances in the next four-year period resulting in the incurrence of higher operating expenses in the range of euro 250-320 million.

To ensure comprehensive, transparent and accurate accountingreporting for GHG emissions, which is consistent over time, Eni introduced in 2005 its own Protocol for the accounting and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions (GHG Accounting and Reporting Protocol), which is an essential requirement for emission certification. Indeed, accurate reporting will supportsupports the strategic management of risks and opportunities related to greenhouse gases, the definition of objectives and the evaluationassessment of progress.

The Eni GHG Protocol has been updated during 2009 to be in compliance with the European and Italian regulation (as the new Monitoring and Reporting Guide Line) and with the best practices reference document (American Petroleum Industry Compendium - August 2009). For safer and more accurate management of GHG emissions and with a view to supporting accounting,effective reporting, Eni provided all its divisions and business units with a dedicated database, in order to gather and report GHG emissions according to the Protocol and to ensure completeness, accuracy, transparency and consistency of GHG accounting as required by certification needs.

78


As a support to its general strategy for a sustainable management of greenhouse gases, Eni continued its programs for the development of natural gas in Italy and outside Italy, by means of technologically advanced projects such as the Blue Stream gas pipeline from Russia to Turkey and the GreenStream pipeline from Libya to Sicily. Increased gas availability in Italy will lead to a further expansion of the gas-power integration, through high efficiency combined cycles with much lower carbon dioxide emissions than coal and liquid fuels.

In the medium-term, work is underway on the separation of carbon dioxide and its permanent storage in geologic reservoirs, a part of the CO2CO2 Capture Project, an international R&D program carried out in conjunction with other oil companies. In the long-term, Eni is actively engaged in the political process regarding future emission reduction regulations. Between 2008 and 2009 the feasibility and environmental impact evaluation studies were carried out and completed. Now the project will go under authorization process (VIA). In particular Eni is involved in bioenergybio-energy and biofuels.bio-fuels.

In both the medium and long-term, management believes that compliance with changes in laws, regulations and obligations relating to climate change could result in substantial capital expenditure, taxes, reduced profitability from changes in operating costs, and revenue generation and strategic growth opportunities being impacted. Eni’s commitment to the transition to a lower-carbon economy may create expectations for our activities and related liabilities, and the level of participation in alternative energies carries reputational, economic and technology risks.

 

Regulation of Eni’s Businesses

Overview

The matters regarding the effects of recent or proposed changes in Italian legislation and regulations or EU directives discussed below and elsewhere herein are forward-looking statements and involve risks and uncertainties that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those in such forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include the precise manner of the interpretation or implementation of such legal and regulatory changes or proposals, which may be affected by political and other developments.

86


Regulation of Exploration and Production Activities

Eni’s exploration and production activities are conducted in many countries and are therefore subject to a broad range of legislation and regulations. These cover virtually all aspects of exploration and production activities, including matters such as license acquisition, production rates, royalties, pricing, environmental protection, export, taxes and foreign exchange. The terms and conditions of the leases, licenses and contracts under which these oil and gas interests are held vary from country to country. These leases, licenses and contracts are generally granted by or entered into with a government entity or state company and are sometimes entered into with private property owners. These arrangements usually take the form of licenses or production sharing agreements. See "Regulation of the Italian Hydrocarbons Industry" and "Environmental Matters" for a description of the specific aspects of the Italian regulation and of environmental regulation concerning Eni’s exploration and production activities.

Licenses (or concessions) give the holder the right to explore for and exploit a commercial discovery. Under a license, the holder bears the risk of exploration, development and production activities and provides the financing for these operations.

In principle, the license holder is entitled to all production minus any royalties that are payable in kind. A license holder is generally required to pay production taxes or royalties, which may be in cash or in kind. Both exploration and production licenses are generally for a specified period of time (except for production licenses in the United States which remain in effect until production ceases). The term of Eni’s licenses and the extent to which these licenses may be renewed vary by area.

In Product Sharing Agreement (PSAs), entitlements to production volumes are defined on the basis of contractual agreements drawn up with state oil companies which hold the concessions. Such contractual agreements regulate the recoverrecovery of costs incurred for the exploration, development and operating activities (cost oil) and give entitlement to a portion of the production volumes exceeding volumes destined to cover costs incurred (profit oil).

A similar scheme to PSAs applies to Service and "Buy-Back" contracts.

In general, Eni is required to pay income tax on income generated from production activities (whether under a license or production sharing agreement). The taxes imposed upon oil and gas production profits and activities may be substantially higher than those imposed on other businesses.

 

Regulation of the Italian Hydrocarbons Industry

The matters regarding the effects of recent or proposed changes in Italian legislation and regulations or EU directives discussed below and elsewhere herein are forward-looking statements and involve risks and uncertainties that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those in such forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include the precise manner of the interpretation or implementation of such legal and regulatory changes or proposals, which may be affected by political and other developments.

79


Exploration & Production

The Italian hydrocarbons industry is regulated by a combination of constitutional provisions, statutes, governmental decrees and other regulations that have been enacted and modified from time to time, including legislation enacted to implement EU requirements (collectively, the "Hydrocarbons Laws").

Exploration permits and production concessions. Pursuant to the Hydrocarbons Laws, all hydrocarbons existing in their natural condition in strata in Italy or beneath its territorial waters (including its continental shelf) are the property of the State. Exploration activities require an exploration permit, while production activities require a production concession, in each case granted by the Ministry of Productive Activities through competitive auctions. The initial duration of an exploration permit is six years, with the possibility of obtaining two three-year extensions and an additional one-year extension to complete activities underway. Upon each of the three year extensions, 25% of the area under exploration must be relinquished to the State. The initial duration of a production concession is 20 years, with the possibility of obtaining a ten-year extension and an additional five-year extension until the field depletes.

87


RoyaltiesRoyalties.. The Hydrocarbons Laws require the payment of royalties for hydrocarbon production. Royalties are equal to 7% and 4%, respectively, for onshore and offshore production of oil and 7% for both onshore and offshore production of natural gas. A bill of law is currently under reviewhas been reviewed by the Italian Parliament which provides for an increase of royalties on hydrocarbon production from the current rate of 7 to 10%. For

Gas & Power

Natural gas market in Italy

The European Directive on Natural Gas was implemented into Italian legislation through Legislative Decree No. 164 of May 23, 2000 ("Decree No. 164"), effective from June 21, 2000. As concerns natural gas activities carried out by Eni, the most relevant aspects of the decree are as follows:

(i)from January 2003 all customers are eligible customers (with access to the natural gas system and free to choose their supplier of natural gas);
(ii)Antitrust thresholds are in place for gas operators in Italy as follows: (a) effective January 1, 2002, operators are prohibited to put into the national transmission network imported or domestically produced gas volumes to be sold in Italy higher than a preset share of Italian final consumption. This share was 75% of total final consumption in 2002 and has decreased by 2 percentage points per year to reach 61% by 2009; and (b) effective January 1, 2003, operators are prohibited to market gas volumes to final customers in excess of 50% of overall volumes marketed to final customers. Compliance with these ceilings is verified yearly by comparing actual average shares obtained by any operator in a given three-year period for both volumes input and volumes marketed to customers with average shares permitted by the law for the same period. Actual shares are computed net of losses (in the case of sales) and volumes of natural gas consumed in own operations;
(iii)natural gas transport and dispatching activities have to be carried out by a separate company that is not allowed to carry out any other activity in the natural gas field, with the only exception of storage, for which, however, accounting and operating unbundling is envisaged. Also distribution, i.e. the transmission of natural gas by means of local gas pipeline networks, has to be carried out by a separate company which cannot perform other gas related activities. Sale activity is compatible only with import, export and production activities; sale activity to final customers is subject to authorization from the Ministry of Economic Development. Concessions for the distribution of natural gas will be awarded by bid procedure; and
(iv)tariff criteria and return on capital employed for transport, dispatching, storage, use of LNG terminals and distribution are determined by the Authority for Electricity and Gas. Third parties are allowed to access transport infrastructure, storage sites, LNG terminals and distribution networks on a regulated basis. As provided for by the decree, a code containing rules and regulations for the operation of and access to infrastructures was prepared by operators on the basis of criteria set by the Authority for Electricity and Gas.

2009 managementended the sixth three-year regulated period for natural gas volumes input in the domestic transmission network, for which the allowed average percentage was 61% of domestic consumption of natural gas, and the fifth three-year regulated period for sales volumes to final customers. Eni’s presence on the Italian market complied with said limits. Those antitrust thresholds are due to expire in 2010. Management expects that they will be revised and terms will be extended.

Law No. 239 of August 23, 2004 on the restructuring of the energy sector in Italy

This law provides for:

a derogation to third party access granted to companies that make direct or indirect investments for the construction of new infrastructure or the upgrading of existing ones such as: (i) interconnections between EU Member States and national networks; (ii) interconnections between non-EU States and national networks for importing natural gas to Italy; (iii) LNG terminals in Italy; and (iv) underground storage facilities in Italy. Investing companies can obtain priority on the assignment of new capacity for a portion of not less than 80% of the new capacity installed and for a period of at least 20 years; and
paragraph 69 provides the authentic interpretation of the rule introduced by Legislative Decree No. 164/2000 concerning the transitional regime of concessions for natural gas distribution activities in urban centers existing at June 21, 2000, which allows for an anticipated repayment of the distribution service, despite being provided through a bid procedure rather than direct entitlements. This law changes the provisions defined by Legislative Decree No. 164/2000 by: (i) extending to December 31, 2007, the transitional period for the continuation of existing concessions, with a possible extension of one further year when public interest is considered important by local authorities; and (ii) canceling the adding up of possible extensions, as provided for by Legislative Decree No. 164/2000, in case of certain conditions

88


(business restructuring, size parameters, shareholding composition). The end of concessions awarded on the basis of a bid procedure remains set as of December 31, 2012. Currently, the Ministry for Economic Development is drafting a revision of the distribution gas market with the aim of reducing the number of distribution companies by providing for an extension of the territory reach of each concession.

Law Decree No. 239/2003

Law Decree No. 239/2003, converted with amendments into Law No. 290/2003, prohibits companies operating in the natural gas and power industries to hold stakes higher than 20% in the share capital of companies owning and managing national networks for the transmission of natural gas and power. The term by which companies must comply with this provision, would translatewhich was initially fixed as of December 31, 2008, has been re-scheduled in a 24-month period deadline following enactment of a specific decree from the Italian Prime Minister which is to establish terms and conditions of the divestments. Currently, Eni is unable to predict that date.

In addition, on March 23, 2006 a Presidential Decree defined criteria and methods for the divestment of the interest held by Eni in Snam Rete Gas SpA, introducing the special powers of the Ministry of Economy and Finance provided for by the regulations on the divestment of interests held by the Italian Government (“golden share”) in the By-laws of this company. Eni’s interest in Snam Rete Gas will also be affected by European Directive No. 73/2009 and how the directive’s guidelines will be implemented in Italian gas regulation.

Regulations aimed at increasing competition in the Italian wholesale segment of natural gas and Law No. 99 of July 23, 2009

In order to implement a Law Decree defined by the Italian Government to face the economic downturn, on March 2009, the Authority for Electricity and Gas proposed certain rules on gas and power sales and production to increase competition on the Italian market. The new rule is aimed at increasing competition on the wholesale segment in Italy, both in the natural gas market and the electricity market. The Authority for Electricity and Gas will define a certain amount of quantities of gas to be sold at a fixed price. The largest operator in the Italian gas market will be obliged to offer this set amount of natural gas. In particular, from October 1 to March 31 of each year, starting from 2009, the largest operator is obliged to offer about 100 mmCM/d and 20 mmCM/d from April 1 to September 30. This rule should limit the discretionarily of the largest operator in defining higher prices of natural gas and on the other side to increase liquidity of the natural gas market in Italy.

On June 26, 2009, the Italian Council of Ministers approved the so called “Anti-crisis Decree” whose Article 3 concerns measures for reducing the cost of energy for industries and households and introduces an obligation for Eni to sale 5 BCM of gas to be delivered in the period October 2009-September 2010 (so called gas release). In particular the decree provides for this offer to be made under non discriminatory competitive procedures (bids) at terms and conditions fixed by the Ministry of Economic Development, taking into account a proposal of the Authority for Electricity and Gas. The compensation due to Eni has been determined by the Ministry for Economic Development, as recommended by the Authority with reference to the average prices of the relevant European markets and coherently with Eni supply costs. This mandatory compensation is lower than Eni’s average supply prices. The difference between the sale price resulting from the bid and the compensation due to Eni is awarded to industrial customers with flat gas withdrawals in the past three years according to criteria determined by the Ministry. The decree provides also that the Authority: (i) introduces digressive elements in transport tariffs for the 2010-2013 regulatory period; (ii) reforms the balancing system by adopting flexibility mechanisms providing advantages to all final customers, including industrial customers; and (iii) promotes the supply of peak services and storage for industrial and power generation customers.

In compliance with the provisions of Law No. 99 of July 23, 2009, entrusting GME (the company managing the Italian electricity market) with the managing and organization of an internal liquid market for natural gas, on March 18, 2010 the Ministry for Economic Development required GME to implement a trading platform (so called “gas exchange”) by May 10, 2010. On that platform, certain volumes of gas are expected to be traded corresponding to legal obligations on part of Italian importers and producers as per Law Decree No. 7/2007. According to such decree: (i) since January 2007 Italian importers are granted authorization to import gas from extra-EU countries upon condition that they offer preset quantities of imported natural gas at the PSV (the Italian virtual trading point); and (ii) Italian producers shall dispose of annual royalties on production due to the Italian State at the same PSV. In May 2010, Eni is required to offer at that new exchange about 40 mmCM, completing the offer obligation related to the volumes imported in thermal year October 1, 2008-September 30, 2009.

Management believes that measures as those described may increase competition on the Italian market resulting in further margin pressures. See also the next paragraph for a description of measures that the Italian

89


Authority for Electricity and Gas is planning to implement about natural gas pricing or suggest at the appropriate governmental level.

Natural gas prices

Following the liberalization of the natural gas sector introduced by Decree No. 164, prices of natural gas sold to industrial and thermoelectric customers as well as to wholesalers are freely negotiated. However the Authority for Electricity and Gas holds a power of surveillance on this matter (see below) under Law No. 481/1995 (establishing the Authority for Electricity and Gas) and Legislative Decree No. 164/2000.

Furthermore, the Authority is entrusted by the Presidential Decree dated October 31, 2002 with the power of regulating natural gas prices to residential and commercial customers which were not eligible until December 31, 2002, also after the full opening up of the gas market from January 1, 2003, additionally targeting the public goal of containing inflationary pressure deriving from increasing energy costs. Consistently with this decree, at present on the basis of different Resolutions of the Authority for Electricity and Gas companies selling natural gas through local networks have to offer to residential customers and customers who live in buildings consuming on the whole less than 200,000 CM/y the regulated tariffs beside their own price proposals.

Changes introduced to the indexation mechanism of the raw material component in supplies to residential customers by the Authority for Electricity and Gas: Resolutions No. 248/2004; 134/2006; 79/2007 and 64/2009

With Resolution No. 79/2007 the Italian Authority for Electricity and Gas established a new indexation mechanism for the raw material cost component in natural gas supplies to customers consuming less than 200,000 CM/y who were not-eligible customers until December 31, 2002 (mainly residential and commercial customers located in urban centers). The new indexation mechanism of the raw material cost component in tariffs paid by end customers consuming less than 200,000 CM/y as set in Resolution No. 79/2007 basically works this way: (i) it has limited the ability of gas operators to transfer to customers changes in the raw material cost by setting a cap of 75% for changes in the raw material component linked to a fall in Brent crude prices below 20 $/BBL or a rise within the 35-60 $/BBL range, raising the cap at 95% if Brent crude prices are higher royaltiesthan 60 $/BBL; (ii) it has changed the relative weight of the three products making up the reference index of energy prices whose variations 2.5% as compared to the same index in the preceding period – determine the adjustment of raw – when higher or lower than material costs; (iii) it has replaced one of the three products included in the index (a pool of crudes) with Brent crude; and (iv) it has reduced the value of the variable wholesale component of the selling price by 0.26 euro/CM. Additionally, Italian natural gas importers – including Eni – were obliged to renegotiate existing wholesale supply contracts in order to take account of this new indexation mechanism.

The indexation mechanism for the raw material cost component in natural gas supplies to residential customers consuming less than 200,000 CM/y has been recently updated with Resolution No. 64/2009 of the Authority. This Resolution provides that updatings of said raw material component take place every three months on the basis of changes in a preset basket of hydrocarbons (including Brent crude, gasoil and light fuel oil). Also a floor has been established in the form of a fixed amount that applies only at certain low level of international prices of hydrocarbons. The Company does not expect any material impact following enactment of Resolution No. 64/2009.

However, management cannot exclude the possibility that in the future the Authority could implement measures in this matter which may negatively affect Eni results of operations and liquidity. On March 26, 2010 the Authority for Electricity and Gas published a consultation document regarding certain proposed amendments to the current mechanism that is used to update the raw material cost component in supplies to residential users. The document addresses Italian gas importers, including Eni. The Authority reaffirmed its belief that such cost component should continue being linked to supply prices as provided by the long-term contracts held by Eni as the incumbent operator in the Italian gas market, as evidence suggests that there have not been sufficiently liquid spot markets in Italy. However, the Authority considers that Eni still holds as large market power as to influence wholesale gas prices. Based on that belief, the Authority suggests that the incumbent operator disposes of predetermined amounts of gas at preset economic conditions that take into account the supply costs of an efficient portfolio of long-term supply contracts which could be lower than current wholesale prices realized by Eni. Alternatively, those gas disposals might be in favor of an independent buyer for amounts that might possibly cover the entire capacity of the wholesale market in Italy. Those proposals require establishment of adequate rules by relevant administrative authorities. In case such rules are not implemented, the Authority plans to continue updating the raw material component in supplies to residential customers on the base of the current updating mechanism as it schedules to do in the fourth quarter of 2010. The eventual update will take into account of any effects associated with ongoing renegotiations of long-term supply contracts and may lead to lower wholesale gas prices.

90


Third Energy Package: European Directive No. 73/2009

As a part of the so-called "Third Energy Package" sanctioned in 2009, European Directive No. 73 regulates the internal market for natural gas. Essentially, the directive requires member states to choose between two options for ensuring carriers’ independence in case transport systems belong to vertically-integrated companies.

The two options provided are:

(i)Separation of ownership under two alternative modes:
-Ownership Unbundling (OU): the company that owns the networks and manages transport activities is unbundled from its integrated parent company that will retain supply/production and sale activities;
-Independent System Operator (ISO): the vertically integrated company retains ownership of the networks but confers their management to an independent party.
(ii)Strengthened functional separation:
-Independent Transmission Operator (ITO): the vertically integrated company can retain control of the company that manages transport activities and owns transport networks, provided the vertically integrated company refrains from interfering in the decision-making process of the controlled carrier company.

Italian Parliament is scheduled to implement European Directive No. 73/2009 in Italian gas regulation by March 2011. Management cannot predict any possible outcome of that matter.

Fully-Regulated Businesses in the Italian Gas Market Transport

Transport

Transport tariffs. The Regulatory Authority for Electricity and Gas set transport criteria companies have to apply in determining natural gas transport and dispatching tariffs on national and regional transportation networks, for each regulatory period made up of four years, as provided for by Decree No. 164/2000. Tariffs are subject to approval by the Authority, which ensures their compliance with preset criteria.

Criteria established by the Authority for Electricity and Gas set allowed revenues that are calculated as the sum of: (i) operating costs including storage and modulation costs; (ii) amortization and depreciation of transport assets; and (iii) return on net capital employed.

With Resolution ARG/gas 184/2009, published on December 2, 2009, the Authority set the criteria regulating the tariffs for natural gas transportation on the national and regional gas pipeline network for the third regulatory period (January 1, 2010-December 31, 2013).

The Regulated Asset Base (RAB) is calculated with the re-valuated historical cost methodology.

The allowed rate of return (WACC) on Regulatory Asset Base (RAB) has been set equal to 6.4% in real terms pre tax.

The new tariff structure confirms the recognition in tariff of expenditures incurred for network upgrading, providing for a higher remuneration than WACC, changing in a 1-3% range in relation to the nature of expenditures and for a period of 5 to 15 years.

Depreciation costs of gas transport infrastructures (gas pipelines) are determined on a 50-years useful technical life and are excluded from the price cap mechanism. Operating costs are defined with reference to operating costs incurred during 2008 and increased by a 50% rate to recognize productivity gains achieved in the second regulatory period. Fuel gas is excluded from the price cap mechanism.

The revenue component related to volumes transported is determined referring to operating costs recognized in tariff and amounts to a 15% of revenue cap.

The Authority also recognized Snam Rete Gas a total amount of euro 33.6 million as settlement of additional costs incurred during the 2007-2008 thermal year and referring to the purchase of fuel gas for compression stations.

Gas not recorded in accounts on the natural gas transport networks in the 2004-2006 period. With Resolution VIS 8/2009, the Regulatory Authority for Electricity and Gas has completed the preliminary investigation on the gas not recorded in accounts started with Resolution VIS 41/2008 “Preliminary investigation on the correct application of the provisions concerning gas not recorded in accounts on the natural gas transport networks in the 2004-2006 period”. Based on the results of this preliminary investigation, future actions to be implemented by Snam Rete Gas were defined in order to improve the process of calculation of natural gas. The total amount to be recognized to the

91


company, with regard to higher costs incurred for the purchase of fuel gas in the thermal years 2005-2006 and 2006-2007, was also set at euro 45 million.

Network Code. From 2003 Snam Rete Gas Network Code is in force, defining rules and regulations for the operation and management of the transmission network. The Network Code, approved by the Regulatory Authority for Electricity and Gas with Resolution No. 75 of July 1, 2003, is based on the criteria set by the same Regulator with Resolution No. 137/2002, aimed at guaranteeing equal access to all customers, maximum impartiality and neutrality in transport and dispatching activities, in accordance with Legislative Decree No. 164/2000.

The Network Code regulates entitlement of transport capacity, obligations of transporter and customer and the procedures through which customers can sell capacity to other users. Transport capacity at entry points in the national gasline network (point of interconnection with import gas lines) is assigned on an annual basis and can last up to five thermal years. Capacity products with duration shorter than one year are also available.

Entities eligible to be assigned transport capacity on a multi-year basis are those having multi-year import contracts within the limit of their daily average contract volumes. Priority criteria envisage that available capacity is assigned first to parties in multi-year import contracts containing take-or-pay clauses signed before August 10, 1998 (date of coming in force of European Directive 98/30/CE). If requests for capacity in a given thermal year are higher than available capacity, a pro-rata mechanism is applied in compliance with the aforementioned priority.

Parties in annual or shorter import contracts and parties in multi-year import contracts are entitled to annual capacity conferrals corresponding to maximum daily contract volumes and the difference between maximum daily contract volumes and average daily contract volumes, respectively. Available transport capacity is assigned first to parties in annual import contracts and parties in multi-year import contracts. If requests for capacity in a given thermal year are higher than available capacity, a pro-rata mechanism is applied in compliance with the aforementioned priority.

Parties can also apply for shorter than one year capacity products (monthly basis at least).

Eni filed a claim against this decision with the Regional Administrative Court of Lombardy, which was partially accepted with a decision of December 2004. An administrative appeals court also confirmed the Company’s position. Specifically, the Court stated that the purchase of the contractual flexibility is an obligation on part of the importer, which responds to a collective interest. According to the Court, there is no reasonable motivation whereby volumes corresponding to such contractual flexibility should not be granted priority in the access to the network, also in case congestion occurs. At the moment, however, no case of congestion occurred at entry points to the Italian transport infrastructure such to impairing Eni’s marketing plans. Management cannot predict a final outcome of this proceeding.

Regasification

Regasification tariffs. The Regulatory Authority for Electricity and Gas has set the criteria regulating the tariffs for the use of LNG terminals in the 3rd regulatory period (October 2008-September 2012) with its Resolution ARG/gas 92/2008.

The Regulatory Asset Base (RAB) is calculated with the re-valuated historical cost methodology. The yearly adjustment of revenues and tariffs will follow the same methodologies applied in the previous regulatory period, except for depreciation that will be adjusted on a yearly basis and excluded from the price cap mechanism. The allowed rate of return (WACC) on Regulatory Asset Base has been set equal to 7.6% in real terms pre tax.

Furthermore, it established an additional remuneration, up to 3% above WACC, for new capital expenditures for a maximum of 16 years.

Operating costs will be adjusted every year taking into account inflation and efficiency gains (X-factor) set by the Authority at 0.5% in real terms.

The Resolution ARG/gas 92/2008 also established that the allocation of reference revenues between regasification capacity and the commodity component is fixed at 90:10 (compared to 80:20 ratio in the second regulated period).

Regasification Code. From 2007 GNL Italia Regasification Code is in force, defining rules and regulations for the operation and management of the regasification plant of Panigaglia, north-west Italy. The Code, approved by the Regulatory Authority for Electricity and Gas with the Resolution VIS 8/2009, has completed the preliminary investigation on No. 115/07 (published May 22, 2007), is based on the criteria for access to LNG regasification services set by the same Regulator with Resolution No. 167/05 (August 1, 2005) in accordance with Legislative

92


Decree No. 164/2000. The decision also defines criteria for the allocation of regasification capacity. In particular it establishes that take-or-pay contracts entered into before 1998, as in the case of Eni, are awarded priority access limited to the minimum amount of volumes that have been regasified in the period starting from thermal year 2001-2002. Eni filed a claim against this decision with the Regional Administrative Court of Lombardy that rejected the claim. Subsequently, Eni filed a claim with a higher degree administrative court.

Distribution

Distribution is the activity of delivering natural gas to residential and commercial customers in urban centers through low pressure networks. Distribution is considered a public service operated in concession and is regulated on the basis of Law Decree No. 164/2000.

Distribution tariffs. With Resolution No. 159/2008, the Regulatory Authority for Electricity and Gas defined a new methodology for determining revenues for natural gas distribution activity. Starting from January 1, 2009 and for the duration of a four-year regulated period, i.e. until 2012, the resolution provides for the recognition of total revenues for each regulated year amounting to approximately euro 20 million.a value that the Authority will set at the time of approving the operators’ requests for distribution tariffs and defined as Total Revenue Constraint (TRC), representing the maximum remuneration recognized by the Authority to each operator for covering costs borne.

In previous years, revenues were determined by applying tariffs set by the Authority to volumes actually distributed to selling companies in the relevant year. The resolution also provides for any positive or negative difference between TRC and revenues resulting from invoices for actually distributed volumes to be regulated through an equalization device making use of credit/debit cards lodged with the Electricity Equalization Exchange.

As a result of the new mechanism, revenues are no longer related to the seasonality of volumes distributed but are constantly apportioned during the year. The introduction of this new mechanism does not cause a decline in total revenues on a yearly basis.

Storage of natural gas

Storage activities in Italy are regulated by Legislative Decree No. 164/2000 ("Decree No. 164"), which enacted the European Directive on Natural Gas 98/30/CE into Italian legislation.164. The most important aspects of Decree No. 164 concerning storage activities are the following: (i) in vertically integrated enterprises, storage is to be carried out by a separate company not operating in other gas activities (such as Eni’s subsidiary Stoccaggi Gas Italia SpA) or by companies engaged only in transport and dispatching activities, provided the accounts of these two activities are clearly separated from the accounts of storage; (ii) storage activity is exercised pursuant to concessions granted by the Ministry of Productive Activities. The duration of a concession is 20 years, with the possibility of obtaining at most two ten-year extensions if operators complied with the storage programs and other obligations deriving from applicable laws. Existing storage concessions are subject to the Decree.decree. Their original term was confirmed and includes relevant production concessions; (iii) the need for strategic storage in Italy is defined explicitly; the burden of strategic storage is imposed upon companies importing from non-EU countries, which have to provide a strategic storage capacity in Italy corresponding to 10% of the amount of natural gas imported each year; (iv) holders of storage concessions are required to provide storage capacity for domestic production, for strategic use and for modulation to eligible users without discriminations, where technically and economically viable; (v) modulation storage costs are charged to shippers which have to provide modulation services adequate to the requirements of their final customers; (vi) storage tariffs criteria are determined by the Authority for Electricity and Gas in order to ensure a preset return on capital employed, taking into account the typical risk inherent in this activity, as well as volumes stored for ensuring peak supplies and the need to incentive capital expenditure for upgrading the storage system; and (vii) the Authority for Electricity and Gas establishes the criteria and priority of access storage operators have to include in their own storage codes.

In compliance with the provisions of Article 21 of Decree No. 164/2000, on October 21, 2001 all storage activities carried out within the Eni Group were conferred to Stoccaggi Gas Italia SpA ("Stogit"(“Stogit”), which holds ten storage concessions.

Storage tariffs. On March 3, 2006, the Regulatory Authority for Electricity and Gas with Resolution No. 50/2006 published the criteria for determining storage tariffs for athe second regulated period starting from(from April 1, 2006 and ending onto March 31, 2010.2010).

According to this Resolution,resolution, the storage company calculates revenues for the determination of unit tariffs for storage services by adding the following cost elements:

(i) a return on the capital employed byAccording to this resolution, the storage company equal to 7.1% (8.33% incalculates revenues for the first regulated period);determination of unit tariffs for storage services by adding the following cost elements:a
(ii) depreciation and amortization charges; and

93


(iii) operating costs.

In the years following the first year of the newly regulated period, reference revenues are updated to take account of variations of capital employed and the impact of the indexation of depreciation charges and operating costs to consumer price inflation lowered by a preset rate of productivity recovery.

Applicable regulation provides for incentives to capital expenditures intended to develop and upgrade storage capacity by recognizing an additional rate of return of 4% on the basic rate to capital expenditure projects aiming at

80


developing new storage deposits and increasing existing capacity. Such incentives are applicable for a sixteen-year period and an eight-year period, respectively.

In November 2007, the ItalianRegulatory Authority for Electricity and Gas and the Italian Antitrust Authority opened an inquiry to gain insight into the functioning of the natural gas storage activity in Italy, particularly with regards to the lack of investments by operators aimed at expanding natural gas storage capacity to store natural gas in Italy. Eni, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Stogit Italia, owns nearly the entire storage capacity currently existing in Italy.Italy (see Resolution VIS 51/2009 below).

With Resolution No. 220/Storage Code. From November 1, 2006 Stoccaggi Gas Italia (Stogit) Storage Code is in force. The Storage Code approved by the ItalianRegulatory Authority for Electricity and Gas approved the storage code proposed by Stoccaggi Gas Italiawith Resolution No. 220/2006, is based on the basis of the framework and criteria established by the Regulator with Resolution No. 119/2005 ("Adoption ofconcerning guarantees for free access to natural gas storage services, duties of subjects operating storage activities and rules for the preparation of a storage code").activities.

This codeCode regulates access to and provision of storage services during normal operational conditions, regulates procedures for conferring storage capacities, fees to be charged to customers in case they uplift from or input to storage sites volumes in excess or uses higher input/uplift capacity with respect to scheduled and operating programs. On the basis of these provisions, Eni may incur significant charges for storage services should the Company fail to use storage services in accordance with scheduled operating programs.

The code has been in force since November 1, 2006.

The storage company offers services according to anthe access priority established by the ItalianRegulatory Authority for Electricity and Gas as follows: (i) mandatory services, including modulation storage, mineral storage, and strategic storage services; and (ii) services for operating needs of transport companies, including hourly modulation.

(i)mandatory services, including modulation storage, mineral storage, and strategic storage services; and
(ii)services for operating needs of transport companies, including hourly modulation.

The modulation storage service is geared towards satisfying modulation needs of natural gas users in terms of peak consumption and daily or seasonal trends in consumption. Final clients consuming less than 200,000 CM on an annual basis are entitled to a priority when satisfying their modulation requirements. To that end, the storage company makes available its capacity for space, injection and off-take on an annual basis in accordance with its storage code.

The mineral storage service aims to allow natural gas producers to perform their activity under optimal operating conditions, according to criteria determined by the Ministry of Economic Development.

The strategic storage service aims to satisfy certain obligations of natural gas importers from countries not belonging to the EU in accordance with Article 3 of Legislative Decree No. 164/2000. The relevant storage capacity dedicated to this service is determined by the Ministry of Economic Development.

Storage capacity is awarded by the storage company for periods no longer than a thermal year by April 1, of each year. The first requests to be met are those for strategic storage and for the operating balancing of the system.

The residual capacity available and the maximum daily uplift capacity is awarded according to the following order of priority to: (i) holders of production concessions requesting mineral storage services; (ii) natural gas selling operators who are held to provide a modulation service of their supply to their customers according to Article 18, paragraphs 2 and 3 of Legislative Decree No. 164/2000, for maximum volumes corresponding to a seasonal demand peak with average temperatures, on the terms and conditions established by a procedure to be issued by the Regulatory Authority for Electricity and Gas; (iii) to the entities mentioned in (ii) above only for those additional maximum volumes related to a seasonal demand peak in case of certain low temperatures measured on a 20-year period, under the terms and conditions of the procedure mentioned in (ii) above; and (iv) the entities requesting access for services different from the ones mentioned above.

From November 2009, according to the Resolution No. 165/2009 set by the Regulator, monthly based storage services are available for gas-network users (Shippers). Storage capacities are sold on auction basis.

Eni held natural gas for strategic reserve purposes in its storage business, as established by Decree No. 164.

The strategic reserves of gas are defined as "stock“stock destined to meet situations of deficit/decrease of supply or crisis of the gas system"system”. The Ministry of the Economic Development determines quantities and usage criteria of

94


such reserves. As of December 31, 2008 Eni held approximately 179 BCF of strategic reserves of natural gas (179 BCF at year end 2007).

 

Gas & Power

Natural gas market in Italy

The European Directive on Natural Gas was implemented into Italian legislation through Legislative Decree No. 164 of May 23, 2000 ("Decree No. 164"), effective from June 21, 2000. As concerns natural gas activities carried out by Eni, the most relevant aspects of the decree are as follows:

81


(i)starting in 2003 all customers are eligible customers (with access to the natural gas system and free to choose their supplier of natural gas);
(ii)Antitrust thresholds are in place for gas operators in Italy as follows: (a) effective January 1, 2002, operators are prohibited to transmit into the national transport network imported or domestically produced gas volumes higher than a preset share of Italian final consumption. This share is 75% of total final consumption in the first year of regulation and then is to decrease by 2 percentage points per year to reach a 61% threshold in terms of final consumption by 2009; and (b) effective January 1, 2003, operators are prohibited to market gas volumes to final customers in excess of 50% of overall volumes marketed to final customers. Compliance with these ceilings is verified yearly by comparing actual average shares obtained by any operator in a given three-year period for both volumes input and volumes marketed to customers with average shares permitted by the law for the same period. Actual shares are computed net of losses (in the case of sales) and volumes of natural gas consumed in own operations. Based on a bill passed by the Italian upper house, Eni expects that these antitrust thresholds will be renewed when they expire in 2010;
(iii)natural gas transport and dispatching activities have to be carried out by a separate company that is not allowed to carry out any other activity in the natural gas field, with the only exception of storage, for which, however, accounting and operating separation is envisaged. Also distribution, which includes the transport of natural gas by means of local gas pipeline networks for delivery to customers, has to be carried out by a separate company which cannot perform other gas related activities. Sales activity to final customers is compatible only with import, export and production activities and is subject to authorization from the Ministry of Productive Activities. Concessions for the distribution of natural gas will be awarded by bid procedure; and
(iv)tariff criteria and return on capital employed for transport, dispatching, storage, use of LNG terminals and distribution are determined by the Authority for Electricity and Gas. Third parties are allowed to access transport infrastructure, storage sites, LNG terminals and distribution networks on a regulated basis. As provided for by the decree, a Network Code containing norms and regulations for the operation of and access to infrastructure was prepared by operators on the basis of criteria set by the Authority for Electricity and Gas.

Year 2008 closed the fifth three-year regulated period for natural gas volumes input in the domestic transport network, for which the allowed average percentage was 63% of domestic consumption of natural gas, and the fourth three-year regulated period for sales volumes to the Italian market. Eni’s presence on the Italian market complied with said limits.

Law No. 239 of August 23, 2004 on the restructuring of the energy sector in Italy

This law provides for:

a derogation to third party access granted to companies that make direct or indirect investments for the construction of new infrastructure or the upgrading of existing ones such as: (i) interconnections between EU Member States and national networks; (ii) interconnections between non-EU States and national networks for importing natural gas to Italy; (iii) LNG terminals in Italy; and (iv) underground storage facilities in Italy. Investing companies can obtain priority on the conferral of new capacity for a portion of not less than 80% of the new capacity installed and for a period of at least 20 years; and
paragraph 69 provides the authentic interpretation of the rule introduced by Legislative Decree No. 164/2000 concerning the transitional regime of concessions for natural gas distribution activities in urban centers existing at June 21, 2000, which allows for an anticipated repayment of the distribution service, despite being provided through a bid procedure rather than direct entitlements. This law changes the provisions defined by Legislative Decree No. 164/2000 by: (i) extending to December 31, 2007, the transitional period for the continuation of existing concessions, with a possible extension of one further year when public interest is considered important by local authorities; and (ii) canceling the adding up of possible extensions, as provided for by Legislative Decree No. 164/2000, in case of certain conditions (business restructuring, size parameters, shareholding composition). The end of concessions awarded on the basis of a bid procedure remains set at December 31, 2012.

Law Decree No. 239/2003

Law Decree No. 239/2003, converted with amendments into Law No. 290/2003, prohibits companies operating in the natural gas and power industries to hold stakes higher than 20% in the share capital of companies owning and managing national networks for the transmission of natural gas and power.

The term by which companies must comply with this provision, which was initially fixed at December 31, 2008, will be re-determined in 24 months after the effective date of said decree from the Italian Prime Minister. Currently, Eni is unable to predict that date.

In addition, on March 23, 2006 a Presidential Decree defined criteria and methods for the divestment of the interest held by Eni in Snam Rete Gas SpA, introducing the special powers of the Ministry of Economy and Finance

82


provided forJoint investigation by the regulations on the divestment of interests held by the Italian Government ("golden share") in the By-laws of this company.

Increasing competition in the wholesale segment of natural gas and power

In order to implement the Law Decree defined by the Italian Government to face the economic downturn, on March 2009, theRegulatory Authority for Electricity and Gas proposed certain rulesand the Antitrust Authority on gas and power sales and production to increase competition on the Italian market.

The new rule is aimed at increasing competition on the wholesale segment in Italy, bothstorage activity in the natural gas market andsector - Resolution VIS 51/2009

By June 2009, the electricity one. TheRegulatory Authority for Electricity and Gas will define a certain amount of quantities of gas to be sold at a fixed price. The main operatorconcluded the investigation into storage activity in the Italian gas market will be obliged to offer this set amount of natural gas. In particular, from October 1 to March 31 of each year, starting from 2009, the main operator is obliged to offer about 100 mmCM per day and 20 mmCM per day from April 1 to September 30. This rule should limit the discretionarily of the main operator in defining higher prices of natural gas and on the other side to increase liquidity of the natural gas market in Italy.

Natural gas prices

Prices of natural gas sold to industrial and thermoelectric customers as well as to wholesalers are freely established among buyers and sellers following the liberalization of the natural gas sector introduced by Decree No. 164. Notwithstanding this, the Authority for Electricity and Gas holds a power of surveillance on this matter (see below) under Law No. 481/1995 (establishing the Authority for Electricity and Gas) and Legislative Decree No. 164/2000.

Furthermore, the Authority is entrusted with the power of regulating natural gas prices to residential and commercial customers which were not eligible customers until December 31, 2002.

In fact, the Presidential Decree dated October 31, 2002 entrusted the Authority for Electricity and Gas with the power to define, calculate and update gas selling prices for customers who were not-eligible customers until December 31, 2002, also after the opening up of the gas markets from January 1, 2003, additionally targeting the public goal of containing inflationary pressure deriving from increasing energy costs. Consistently with this decree, the Authority for Electricity and Gas: (i) with Decision No. 195 of November 29, 2002 changed the methods for periodically updating selling prices for natural gas in connection with changes in international prices of crude oil and refined products. Such changes regarded the scheduled update process (from every two months to every three), and the duration of the reference period for the calculation of changes in average international prices as compared to the first application quarter (changes are calculated with reference to a nine-month period preceding the update). The invariance threshold, beyond which tariffs are updated, remained at 5%; and (ii)commenced with Resolution No. 207 of December 12, 2002, it decided287/2007 (November 22, 2007) and performed jointly with the Antitrust Authority. The Authorities stated in their conclusions that companies selling natural gascapital expenditure plans implemented by Eni through local networks haveStogit (now controlled by Snam Rete Gas) in the storage activity were inconsistent with plans to maintain the conditions applied to non-eligible customers until December 31, 2002 until the customer accepts a new contract offer. In addition, the Authority for Electricityupgrade storage capacity, as proposed by Stogit and Gas decided that these companies can propose their own new contract offers and the tariffs determined according to the criteria establishedapproved by the Authority for Electricity and Gas, adequately advertising them before March 31, 2003 (such offers must be published on the companies web page, on at least one newspaper of general circulation and on the Gazzetta Ufficiale of their region or autonomous province).Gas.

Changes introduced to the indexation mechanismThe outcome of the raw material component in suppliesinvestigation underscored that the national gas system lacks sufficient degrees of security and flexibility so as to residential customers by the Authority for Electricity and Gas: Resolutions No. 248/2004; 134/2006 and 79/2007

With Resolution No. 79/2007 the Italian Authority for Electricity and Gas established a new indexation mechanism for the raw material cost component in natural gas supplies to customers consuming less than 200,000 CM/y who were not-eligible customers until December 31, 2002 (mainly residential and commercial customers located in urban centers). The new indexation mechanism of the raw material cost component in tariffs paid by end customers consuming less than 200,000 CM/y as set in Resolution No. 79/2007 basically works this way: (i) it has limited the ability of gasenable third operators to transfer to customers changescompete effectively in a liberalized market. Both authorities suggested certain potential regulatory measures: the raw material costdivestiture by setting a capEni of 75% for changes in the raw material component linked to a fall in Brent crude prices below 20 $/BL or a rise within the 35-60 $/BL range, raising the cap at 95% if Brent crude prices are higher than 60 $/BL; (ii) it has changed the relative weight of the three products making up the reference index of energy prices whose variations – when higher or lower than 2.5% as compared to the same index in the preceding period – determine the adjustment of raw material costs; (iii) it has replaced one of the three products included in the index (a pool of crudes) with Brent crude; and (iv) it has reduced the value of the variable wholesale component of the selling price by 0.26 euro/CM. Additionally, Italian natural gas importers – including Eni – were obliged to renegotiate existing wholesale supply contractssome storage assets in order to take accountboth promote competition in the sector through the entry of this new indexation mechanism. Forindependent operators, and create premises to develop new storage capacity; and the year 2005, the Resolution introduced a transitory regime whereby the impactmodification of the sector-specific regulation through the introduction of new indexation mechanism was equally sharedcriteria for allocating modulation storage capacity through public bids and mineral storage capacity by, importers and wholesalers in case importers had renegotiated existing wholesale contracts and informed of this the Authority. On these basis, Eni reversed part of the reserves accrued in Eni’s accounts for 2005 and 2006 with respect to the

83


preliminary estimated impact of the new indexation mechanism on its gas selling margins resulting in a gain recognized in the profit and lossamong others, providing incentives for the year 2007. See "Item 5 – Results of Operations – Gas & Power".

This indexation mechanism applies for a two-year period effective July 1, 2006, with the option of a one year extension following a decision of the Authority. Eni cannot foresee any development of this matter.

Transport

Transport tariffs. With Resolution No. 120 of May 30, 2001, the Authority for Electricity and Gas published the criteria transport companies have to apply in determining natural gas transport and dispatching tariffs on national and regional transportation networks, for the first regulatory period made up of four thermal years (each thermal year begins on October 1 of each calendar year and ends on September 30), as provided for by Decree No. 164/2000. Tariffs are subject to approval by the same Authority, which ensures their compliance with preset criteria. This tariff system substituted previous agreements between Eni and customers of all categories. Within the first quarter of each calendar year, transport companies submit the tariff proposal to the Authority for Electricity and Gas who grants approval.

Criteria established by the Authority for Electricity and Gas set a cap on revenues from transport and dispatching activity ("allowed revenues") which is adjusted annually; the criteria also define a separate treatment of revenues on existing assets and on new capital expenditure on expansions and extension of infrastructure.

In the first thermal year allowed revenues are calculated as the sum of: (i) operating costs including storage and modulation costs; (ii) amortization and depreciation of transport assets; and (iii) return on net capital employed. Net capital employed is calculated by re-evaluating historic costs of transport infrastructure (pipelines, compressor stations and other support equipment) on the basis of certain inflationary indexes; resulting amounts are adjusted to take into account the residual useful life of assets (pipelines are estimated to have a useful life of 40 years) and also subtracting State grants. The application of this methodology implies an estimated value of Eni’s transport assets of approximately euro 9.6 billion. This, however, is a valuation for regulatory purposes and should not be read as an indication of the market value of Snam Rete Gas. The rate of return on capital employed set by the Authority for Electricity and Gas was 7.94% (pre-tax), for the first regulatory period. Once established, allowed revenues for the first year are divided into two components: (i) capacity revenues equal to 70% of allowed revenues which are the maximum amount of revenues collectable from the sale of transport capacity to customers; and (ii) commodity revenues equal to 30% of allowed revenues which are the maximum amount of revenues collectable from transported volumes.

Starting from the second year these two components are adjusted on a yearly basis to take into account inflation and certain reduction factors (set at 2% and 4.5% for capacity revenues and commodity revenues, respectively); commodity revenues are also adjusted to transported volumes of the current regulatory period. The 2% reduction factor on capacity revenues provides scope for improving results of operations of the transport company if cost reductions exceed the set amount, whereas the 4.5% reduction factor on commodity revenues provides scope for improving results of operations of the transport company if transported volumes grow more than the reduction factor. New capital expenditures in extension and expansion enable transport companies to increase the capacity revenue by a stated percentage in the regulatory period following the period in which new capital expenditures are incurred.

In addition, those capital expenditures give rise to a six year fixed increase in allowed commodity revenues. At the end of the first regulatory period, all transport cost components were recalculated and 50% of higher cost reductions with respect to established efficiency improvements were recognized to transport companies and 50% were transferred to customers. Once the allowed revenues are established, transport companies define individual tariffs to clients which are based on a charge for the capacity used at the entry location (border, fields, storage sites) and the capacity used at interconnection nodes with regional networks (divided into 17 zones) and on a charge for the capacity used at regional level, providing for discounts to those outgoing the network at less than 15 kilometers from the interconnection point between regional and national networks. A further charge (commodity charge) is related to the amounts of gas transported plus an annual fixed charge varying according to the delivery points. This tariff system regulated the four-thermal year period starting October 1, 2001 and ending on September 30, 2005.

With Resolution No. 166/2005, the Authority for Electricity and Gas revised the outlined tariff regime for the second regulatory period (October 1, 2005-September 30, 2008). The new tariff structure confirms the breakdown of the tariff into two components: capacity and commodity in a ratio of 70 to 30 and the entry-exit model for the determination of the capacity component on the national pipeline network, already present in the previous tariff regime established by Resolution No. 120/2001. The major new elements of the new regime are the following: (i) a reduction of the rate of return of capital employed in transport activities from 7.94% to 6.7% (pre-tax); (ii) a new set of incentives for new capital expenditure. In the previous regime, the return on upgrade and capacity expansion expenditure was 7.47% for one year only included in the calculation of the capacity component of the transport tariff and 4.98% for 6 years in the calculation of the commodity component. The new tariff structure provides an additional rate of return depending on the type of expenditure on the return rate recognized for capital employed:

84


from a minimum of 1% for safety measures that do not increase transport capacity, applied for 5 years, to a maximum of 3% for expenditure that increases capacity at entry points into the national network, applied for 15 years. The additional return is part of the determination of the maximum allowed revenues in the calculation of the capacity component of the tariff and therefore is not influenced by changes in volumes transported; (iii) the updating by means of a price cap mechanism of the allowed revenues the transport undertaking is entitled to and the annual recalculation of the portion of allowed revenues relating to costs incurred for capital expenditure. This price cap mechanism applies to operating costs and amortization charges (previously it applied to all the allowed revenues). The annual rate of recovery of productivity was confirmed at 2%; this is used to reduce the effect of changes in the consumer price index on the updating of the preceding years allowed revenues; instead the preset annual rate of change of productivity recovery for the updating of the commodity component of the tariff was reduced from 4.5% to 3.5% of; and (iv) confirmation of the tariff reduction for start ups (construction/upgrade of combined cycle plants for power generation) and for off take in low season periods (from May 1 to October 31) already contained in Decisions No. 5/2005 and 6/2005 which updated the previous tariff regime. The companies active in the field of gas transport submit their tariff proposals to the Authority who grants approval, within the first quarter of each calendar year.

Network code. With Resolution No. 75 of July 1, 2003, the Authority for Electricity and Gas approved Snam Rete Gas Network Code, which defines rules and regulations for the operation and management of the transmission network. The Network Code, in accordance with Legislative Decree No. 164/2000, is based on the criteria set by the Authority for Electricity and Gas with Resolution No. 137/2002, aimed at guaranteeing equal access to all customers, maximum impartiality and neutrality in transport and dispatching activities. The Network Code regulates entitlement of transport capacity, obligations of transporter and customer and the procedures through which customers can sell capacity to other users. Transport capacity at entry points in the national gasline network (point of interconnection with import gas lines) is assigned on an annual basis and can last up to five thermal years.

Entities eligible to be assigned transport capacity on a multi-year basis are those having multi-year import contracts within the limit of their daily average contract volumes. Priority criteria envisage that available capacity is assigned first to parties in multi-year import contracts containing take-or-pay clauses signed before August 10, 1998 (date of coming in force of European Directive 98/30/CE). If requests for capacity in a given thermal year are higher than available capacity, a pro-rata mechanism is applied in compliance with the aforementioned priority.

Parties in annual or shorter import contracts and parties in multi-year import contracts are entitled to annual capacity conferrals corresponding to maximum daily contract volumes and the difference between maximum daily contract volumes and average daily contract volumes, respectively. Available transport capacity is assigned first to parties in annual import contracts and parties in multi-year import contracts. If requests for capacity in a given thermal are higher than available capacity, a pro-rata mechanism is applied in compliance with the aforementioned priority.

Eni filed a claim against this decision with the Regional Administrative Court of Lombardy, which was partially accepted with a decision of December 2004. The Authority filed a claim against this decision with the Council of State and informed Eni on February 19, 2005. This proceeding is still pending.

Adoption of guarantees for free access to LNG regasification services and rules for the regasification code. With Resolution No. 167 of August 1, 2005, the Authority for Electricity and Gas published the criteria for access to LNG regasification services. The Decision also defines criteria for the allocation of regasification capacity. In particular it establishes that take-or-pay contracts entered into before 1998, as in the case of Eni, are awarded priority access limited to the minimum amount of volumes that have been regasified in the period starting from thermal year 2001-2002. Eni filed a claim against this decision with the Regional Administrative Court of Lombardy that rejected the claim. Subsequently, Eni filed a claim with a higher degree administrative court.

Tariffs criteria for the use of LNG terminals in the third regulatory period. The Authority for Electricity and Gas has set the criteria regulating the tariffs for the use of LNG terminals in the 3rd regulatory period (October 2008-September 2012) with its ARG/gas 92/08 resolution.

The Regulatory Asset Base (RAB) is calculated with the re-valuated historical cost methodology. The yearly adjustment of revenues and tariffs will follow the same methodologies applied in the previous regulatory period, except for depreciation that will be adjusted on a yearly basis and excluded from the price cap mechanism. The allowed rate of return (WACC) on Regulatory Asset Base has been set equal to 7.6% in real terms pre tax. Furthermore, it established an additional remuneration, up to 3% above WACC, for new capital expenditures for a maximum of 16 years. Operating costs will be adjusted every year taking into account inflation and efficiency gains (X- factor) set by the Authority at 0.5% in real terms.

The ARG/gas 92/08 resolution also established that the allocation of reference revenues between regasification capacity and the commodity component is fixed at 90:10 (compared to 80:20 ratio in the second regulated period).

85


Gas not recorded in accounts on the natural gas transport networks in the 2004-2006 period. The Italian Authority for Electricity and Gas with the Resolution VIS 8/09, has completed the preliminary investigation on the gas not recorded in accounts started with Resolution VIS 41/08 "Preliminary investigation on the correct application of the provisions concerning gas not recorded in accounts on the natural gas transport networks in the 2004-2006 period". Based on the results of this preliminary investigation, future actions to be implemented by Snam Rete Gas were defined in order to improve the process of calculation of natural gas. The total amount to be recognized to the company, with regard to higher costs incurred for the purchase of fuel gas in the thermal years 2005-2006 and 2006-2007, was also set at euro 45 million. The Authority also established to determine in subsequent resolutions the additional costs incurred by the company for the thermal years 2007-2008 and 2008-2009.

Distribution

Distribution is the activity of delivering natural gas to residential and commercial customers of urban centers through low pressure networks. Distribution is considered a public service operated in concession and is regulated on the basis of Law Decree No. 164/2000.

Distribution tariffs. With Resolution No. 159/2008, the Authority for Electricity and Gas defined a new methodology for determining revenues for natural gas distribution activity. Starting from January 1, 2009 and for the duration of four-year regulated period, i.e. until 2012, the resolution provides for the recognition of total revenues for each regulated year amounting to a value that the Authority will set at the time of approving the operators’ requests for distribution tariffs and defined as Total Revenue Constraint (TRC), representing the maximum remuneration recognized by the Authority to each operator for covering costs borne.

In previous years, revenues were determined by applying tariffs set by the Authority to volumes actually distributed to selling companies in the relevant year. The resolution also provides for any positive or negative difference between TRC and revenues resulting from invoices for actually distributed volumes to be regulated through an equalization device making use of credit/debit cards lodged with the Electricity Equalization Exchange.

As a result of the new mechanism, revenues are no longer related to the seasonality of volumes distributed but are constantly apportioned during the year. The introduction of this new mechanism does not cause a decline in total revenues on a yearly basis.marginal fields.

 

Refining and Marketing of Petroleum Products

Refining.Under Decree No. 112, companies that seek to establish refining operations in Italy or to expand the capacity of existing refining operations must obtain an operating concession from the relevant Region, while companies that seek to build or operate new plants that do not increase refining capacity must obtain an authorization from the relevant Region. Management expects no material delays in obtaining relevant concessions for the upgrading of the Sannazzaro and Taranto refineries as planned in the medium-term.

Service stations. Legislative Decree No. 32 of February 11, 1998, as amended by Legislative Decree No. 348346 of September 8, 1999 and Law Decree No. 383 of October 29, 1999, as converted in Law No. 496 of December 28, 1999, significantly changed Italian regulation of service stations. The decreeLegislative Decree No. 32 replaces the system of concessions granted by the Ministry of Industry, regional and local authorities with an authorization granted by city authorities.authorities while the Legislative Decree No. 112/112 of March 31, 1998 confersstill confirms the power to grantsystem of such concessions for the construction and operation of service stations on highways and confers the power to grant to Regions. Decree No. 32 also requires that contracts between license holders and service station operators have a duration of not less than six years and beare drafted in accordance with arrangements agreed by the relevant trade group of license holders and the union representatives for the service station operators. Decree No. 32 also provides for: (i) the testing of compatibility of existing service stations with local planning and environmental regulations and with those concerning traffic safety to be performed by city authorities; (ii) upon the closure of at least 7,000 service stations, the option to extend by 50% the opening hours (currently 52 hours per week) and a generally increased flexibility in scheduling opening hours; (iii) simplification of regulations concerning the sale of non-oil products and the permission to perform simple maintenance and repair operations at service stations; and (iv) the opening up of the logistics segment by permitting third party access to unused storage capacity for petroleum products. With the same goal of renewing the Italian distribution network, Law No. 57/57 of March 5, 2001 provides that the Ministry of Productive Activities is to prepare guidelines for the modernization of the network, and the Regions shall follow those guidelines in the preparation of regional plans. The decree was issued onsubsequent Ministerial Decree of October 31, 2001 and establishedestablishes the criteria for the closing down of incompatible stations, the approval of the plan, the renewal of the network, the opening up of new stations and the regulations of the operations of service stations on matters such as automation, working hours and non oil activities.

Law No. 133 of August 6, 2008, by intervening in competition provisions, removes some national and regional regulations which might prejudice the liberty of establishment and introduces new provisions particularly concerning the elimination of restrictions concerning distances between service stations, the obligation to undertake non oil activities and the liberalization of opening hours. Management believes that those measures will favor competition in the Italian retail market and support efficient operators.

Petroleum product prices. Petroleum product prices were completely deregulated in May 1994 and are now freely established by operators. Oil and gas companies periodically report their recommended prices to the Ministry of Productive Activities; such recommendations are considered by service station operators in establishing retail prices for petroleum products.

8695


With a recommendation approved at its meeting of January 18, 2007 and submitted to the Government and the Regions, the Italian Antitrust Authority requested the elimination of local constraints to the opening up of the fuel distribution outlets aimed at increasing competition and reducing retail prices. Specifically, the Authority urged the following measures in order to enhance the level of competition in the sector of retail marketing of fuels: (i) the development of the marketing of fuels by large retailers (supermarkets, large chain-stores, etc.); (ii) the elimination of administrative constraints to the opening of new service stations; (iii) a liberalization of opening hours; and (iv) transparency for consumers, identifying any useful tools for proper information on actual prices imposed by operators in each outlet. Currently, Eni is unable to forecast a time frame for this matter. Implementation of any of these suggested measures could enhance the level of competition in the retail marketing of fuels, leading to a reduction in retail margins for all operators.

Compulsory stocks.According to Legislative Decree of January 31, 2001, No. 22 ("Decree 22/2001") enacting European Directive No. 98/1993 (which regulates the obligation of member states to keep a minimum amount of stocks of crude oil and/or petroleum products) compulsory stocks, must be at least equal to the quantities required by 90 days of consumption of the Italian market (net of oil products obtained by domestically produced oil). In order to satisfy the agreement with the International Energy Agency (Law No. 883/1977), Decree 22/2001 increased the level of compulsory stocks to reach at least 90 days of net import, including a 10% deduction for minimum operational requirements. Decree 22/2001 states that compulsory stocks are determined each year by a decree of the Minister of Productive ActivitiesEconomic Development based on domestic consumption data of the previous year, defining also the amounts to be held by each oil company on a site-by-site basis.

AtAs of December 31, 20082009 Eni owned 6.3 mmtonnes of oil products inventories, of which 4.44.5 mmtonnes as "compulsory stocks", 1.51.4 mmtonnes related to operating inventories in refineries and depots (including 0.2 mmtonnes of oil products contained in facilities and pipelines) and 0.4 mmtonnes related to specialty products.

Eni’s compulsory stocks (at(as of December 31, 2008)2009) were held in term of crude oil (30%(34%), light and medium distillates (47%(46%), fuel oil (19%(16%) and other products (4%) and they were located throughout the Italian territory both in refineries (72%(70%) and in storage sites (28%(30%).

 

RecentItalian tax developmentdevelopments

The "Treaty of Friendship" between the Republic of Italy and Libya was enacted by Italy’s upper house on February 3, 2009 and is about to be published shortly. This2009. The law under Article No. 3 has introduced a supplemental tax rate applicable to taxable income of such individual companies that engage in the exploration and production of hydrocarbons, where fixed assets, including both tangible and intangible assets and investments dedicated to oil and gas operations exceed 33% of their respective items in the balance sheet, also having a market capitalization in excess of euro 20 billion. This supplemental tax is due whenever taxes currently payable represent less than 19% of taxable income and is to be determined as the lower of the amount of income taxes up to 19% of taxable income and the amount resulting from applying a certain set of decreasing rates to companies’ net equity as determined from individual financial statements. Eni fell within the scope of this supplemental tax. This supplemental tax rate is due for 2009 and following years up to 2028. In 2009, Eni believes that the parent company Eni Spa will likely fall within the scope of this supplemental tax rate based on the criteria set by the lawincurred taxes current payable amounting to identify the persons subject to the new tax rate and the conditions regulating its enactment.euro 239 million. According to management’s estimates the new supplemental tax rate will cause the Company to incur additional tax payable amounting to approximately euro 300 million for the full yearsamounts roughly in line with 2009 2010 and 2011. In subsequent years this expense will amount to approximately euro 180 million per year.in future years. The Company is planning to file recourse against this law.

Competition

Like all Italian companies, Eni is subject to Italian and EU competition rules. EU competition rules are set forth in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty of Rome as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam dated October 2, 1997 and entered into force on May 1, 1999 ("Article 81" and "Article 82", respectively being the result of the new denomination of former Articles 85 and 86) and EU Merger Control Regulation No. 4064 of 1989 ("EU Regulation 4064"). Article 81 prohibits collusion among competitors that may affect trade among member states and that has the object or effect of restricting competition within the EU. Article 82 prohibits any abuse of a dominant position within a substantial part of the EU that may affect trade among member states. EU Regulation 4064 sets certain limits for cross-border transactions, above which enforcement authority rests with the European Commission and below which enforcement is carried out by national competition authorities, such as the Antitrust Authority in the case of Italy. On May 1, 2004, a new regulation of the European Council came into force (No. 1/2003) which substitutes Regulation No. 17/1962 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty. In order to simplify the procedures required of undertakings in case of concentration, the new regulation substitutes the obligation to inform the Commission with a declaration that such concentration does not infringe the Treaty. In addition, the burden of proving an infringement of Article 81(1) or of Article 82 of the Treaty shall rest on the party or the authority alleging the infringement. The undertaking or association of undertakings

87


claiming the benefit of Article 81(3) of the Treaty shall bear the burden of proving that the conditions of that paragraph are fulfilled. The regulation defines the functions of Authorities guaranteeing competition in Member States and the powers of the Commission and of national courts. The competition authorities of the Member States shall have the power to apply Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty in individual cases. For this purpose, acting on their own initiative or on a complaint, they may take the following decisions:

requiring that an infringement be brought to an end;
ordering interim measures;
accepting commitments; and
imposing fines, periodic penalty payments or any other penalty provided for in their national law.
  • requiring that an infringement be brought to an end;
  • ordering interim measures;
  • accepting commitments; and
  • imposing fines, periodic penalty payments or any other penalty provided for in their national law.

National courts shall have the power to apply Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty. Where the Commission, acting on a complaint or on its own initiative, finds that there is an infringement of Article 81 or of Article 82 of the Treaty,

96


it may: (i) require the undertakings and associations of undertakings concerned to bring such infringement to an end; (ii) order interim measures; (iii) make commitments offered by undertakings to meet the concerns expressed to them by the Commission binding on the undertakings; and (iv) find that Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty are not applicable to an agreement for reasons of Community public interest.

Eni is also subject to the competition rules established by the Agreement on the European Economic Area (the "EEA Agreement"), which are analogous to the competition rules of the Treaty of Rome and apply to competition in the European Economic Area (which consists of the EU and Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein). These competition rules are enforced by the European Commission and the European Free Trade Area Surveillance Authority.

In addition, Eni’s activities are subject to Law No. 287 of October 10, 1990 (the "Antitrust Law"). In accordance with the EU competition rules, the Antitrust Law prohibits collusion among competitors that restricts competition within Italy and prohibits any abuse of a dominant position within the Italian market or a significant part thereof. However, the Antitrust Authority may exempt for a limited period agreements among companies that otherwise would be prohibited by the Antitrust Law if such agreements have the effect of improving market conditions and ultimately result in a benefit for consumers.

 

Property, Plant and Equipment

Eni has freehold and leasehold interests in real estate in numerous countries throughout the world, but no oneworld. Management believes that certain individual property is materialpetroleum properties are of major significance to Eni as a whole. Management regards an individual petroleum property as material to the Group in case it contains 10 per cent or more of the Company’ worldwide proved oil and gas reserves and management is committed to invest material amounts of expenditures in developing it in the future. See "Exploration & Production" above for a description of Eni’s both material and other properties and reserves and sources of crude oil and natural gas.

 

Organizational Structure

Eni SpA is the parent company of the Eni Group. As of December 31, 2008,2009, there were 283276 fully consolidated subsidiaries and 8083 associates that were accounted for under the equity or cost method. For a list of subsidiaries of the Company, see "Exibit 8 –"Exhibit 8. List of Eni’s fully consolidated subsidiaries for year 2008"2009".

 

 

97


Item 4A. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.


Item 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

This section is the Company’s analysis of its financial performance and of significant trends that may affect its future performance. It should be read in conjunction with the Key Information presented in Item 3 and the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes thereto included in Item 18. The Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the IASB.

This section contains forward-looking statements which are subject to risks and uncertainties. For a list of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements, see the cautionary statement concerning forward-looking statements on page ii.

88


Executive Summary

Eni reported net profit of euro 8,8254,367 million in 2008,for the year ended December 31, 2009, representing a decrease of 11.8% compared to 2007.50.5% from 2008.

OperatingThe Group operating profit in 2008for the year ended December 31, 2009 amounted to euro 18,64112,055 million, down 1.2%34.9% from 20072008 mainly reflecting the lowera down operating profit reported by Eni’s downstream businesses as the RefiningExploration & Marketing, PetrochemicalsProduction and Gas & Power segments reporteddue to lower operating profitoil and gas prices and a weaker gas demand. In the Gas & Power segment, the impact of lower gas prices was mitigated by euro 1,752 million, euro 896 million and euro 194 million, respectively.a time-lag in the indexation mechanism on residential sales. Management believes that this mechanism will have an opposite effect on the Group’s results in coming quarters. The Group results were also affected by higher amortization charges taken in connection with new investments. These reductionsnegatives were partly offset by improved operatingrecognition of lower inventory write-downs and lower impairments of property, plant and equipment particularly in the Refining & Marketing and Petrochemical segments. Operating profit recorded by:also benefited from a strengthening of the dollar against the euro.

(i)the Exploration & Production segment which reported an increase in operating profit of euro 2,627 million. This improvement was mainly driven by higher hydrocarbon realizations in dollar terms; and
(ii)the Engineering & Construction segment which reported an increase in operating profit of euro 208 million. This improvement mainly reflected favorable market trends.

Eni’s Group results for the year were also reduced by higher finance charges, up euro 681 million, and higher income taxes, up euro 473 million. These negative factors were partly offsetlower profits reported by higher profit (up euro 130 million) from non consolidated entities that are accounted for under the equity or the cost method.method (down euro 804 million) and a higher consolidated tax-rate, increasing from 50.3% to 56% (up 5.7 percentage points).

Net cash provided by operating activities amounted to euro 21,80111,136 million includingfor the year ended December 31, 2009. Other sources of cash were the divestment of a 20% interest in OAO Gazprom Neft for euro 3,070 million, plus proceeds on advances received from the partner Suez (euro 1,552 million) following the signingsale of a number51% interest in OOO SeverEnergia (Eni’s share 60%) for euro 155 million or $230 million, where the value of long-term gasthe transaction amounted to $940 million. Both transactions were carried out under call option agreements signed with Gazprom in 2007. Subscription by Snam Rete Gas minorities of a share capital increase amounted to euro 1,542 million and electricity supply contracts, andfurther cash from divestments (euro 1,160 million)proceeds of euro 370 million were mainly associated with the divestment of certain non strategic assets in the Exploration & Production division, following agreements signed with Suez in 2008. Those cash inflows were used to partially fund the majoritycapital expenditures of cash outflows relating to: (i) capital and exploratory expenditures totaling euro 14,562 million; (ii) the acquisition of assets and investments (euro 4,30513,695 million, which include cash and finance debt acquired as partcompletion of the purchased companies); and (iii) dividend distribution to Eni’s shareholders and Eni share repurchasesDistrigas acquisition through a buy-out of minorities for a total cash returnconsideration of euro 2,045 million, payment of dividends to Eni shareholders (euro 4,166 million of which euro 5,6881,811 million related to the interim dividend during 2009) as well as minority dividend payments and share repurchasesto minorities (euro 350 million) in particular relating mainly to the listed subsidiaries Snam Rete Gas SpA and Saipem SpA (totaling euro 288(euro 335 million).

As of December 31, 20082009 net borrowings amounted to euro 18,37623,055 million, representing a euro 2,049 millionan increase from 2007. This increase mainly reflected the large amount of capital expenditures and acquisitions executed in the year which was only partially funded with cash flows from operations.

On the basis of the results achieved, Eni’s management proposed to the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting the distribution of a dividend of euro 1.30 per share, of which euro 0.65 had been paid as interim dividend in September4,679 million from December 31, 2008. This dividend is in line with 2007 (euro 1.30 per share) and was approved by the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting on April 30, 2009.

Eni’s oil and gas production for the year (on an available for sale basis) increaseddecreased by 3.8%1.8% to 1,748 KBOE/1.72 mmBOE/d. This performance was mainly due to:

(i) the contribution of assets acquired in the Gulf of Mexico, Congo and Turkmenistan (up 62 KBOE/d compared to 2007); andOPEC cuts;
(ii) weak European gas demand;
(iii)mature field declines;
(iv)unplanned facility downtime; and
(v)continuing production ramp-upsecurity issues in Angola, Congo, Egypt, Pakistan and Venezuela.Nigeria.

These positivenegative factors were offset in part by:

(i) mature field declines;continuing production ramp-up/start-ups in Angola, Congo, Egypt, Kazakhstan, Venezuela and the Gulf of Mexico; and

98


(ii) planned and unplanned facility downtime in the North Sea;
(iii)hurricane-related impacts in the Gulf of Mexico (down 11 KBOE/d); and
(iv)lowerhigher entitlements in certain Production Sharing Agreements (PSAs) and similar contractual schemes (down 37(up 35 KBOE/d compared to 2007)2008) due to higherlower oil prices. Under such contracts, Eni is entitled to fixed monetary amounts settled in quantities of oil to recover the expenses incurred for the development of the relevant properties and as a consequence of higherlower oil prices, the volumes that areentitlements necessary to cover the same amount of expenses are lower.higher.

On October 31, 2008, the international partners of the North Caspian Sea Production Sharing Agreement (NCSPSA) consortium and the Kazakh authorities signed the final agreement implementing the new contractual and governance framework of the Kashagan project, based on the Memorandum of Understanding signed on January 14, 2008. For a more detailed discussion of this project see "Item 4 – Exploration & Production – Kazakhstan".

Worldwide gas sales in 20082009 amounted to 104.23103.7 BCM, up 5.3%down 0.5% from 20072008 due to growth achieved in international markets (up 8.53 BCM), particularly in the main European markets, and the contribution of the acquisition of Distrigas that was completed in October 2008 (up 5.23 BCM). These increases were offset in part by lower salesvolumes supplied to the domesticItalian market (down 3.26 BCM) as a resultagainst the backdrop of the economic downturn and stronger competitive pressure.pressures (down 12.83 BCM, or 24.3%). The decline in sales in Italy were partly offset by higher volumes associated with the full contribution of the Distrigas acquisition (up 12.02 BCM for the full year) and organic growth achieved in a number of European markets.

Capital expenditures in 20082009 amounted to euro 13,695 million (euro 14,562 million (euro 10,593 million in 2007)2008), of which 84%86% related to the Exploration & Production (up 2.2%), Gas & Power (down 18.1%) and Refining & Marketing segments, and mainly regarded:(down 34.2%) divisions. Main expenditures were the following:

(i) oil & gas development activities (euro 6,429 million)were euro 7,478 million and were deployed mainly in Kazakhstan, the United States, Egypt, Angola, Congo, Italy and Italy;Angola;

89


(ii) exploration projects (euro 1,918 million)were euro 1,228 million of which 93% was spent97% were carried out outside Italy, primarily in the United States, Libya, Egypt, Nigeria, AngolaNorway and Libya;Angola;
(iii) the purchaseacquisition of proved and unproved property (euro 836 million)properties amounting to euro 697 million mainly related mainly to the acquisition of a 27.5% interest in assets with gas shale reserves from Quicksilver Resources Inc and extension of mineral rightsthe duration of oil and gas properties in LibyaEgypt following anthe agreement signed in October 2007 with the state oil company NOC and the purchase of a 34.81% interest in the Abo project in Nigeria;May 2009;
(iv) development and upgrading of Eni’s natural gas transport and distribution networksnetwork in Italy (euro 1,130amounted to euro 919 million. Distribution network upgrades were euro 278 million, and further euro 233282 million respectively)were invested to develop and upgrading of natural gas import pipelines to Italy (euro 233 million);increase storage capacity;
(v) ongoing construction of combined cycle power plants (euro 107 million);
(vi)the Refining & Marketing division (euro 965 million) for projects aimed at upgradingimproving the conversion capacity and flexibility of refineries including construction of a new hydrocracking unit at the Sannazzaro refinery, building of newamounted to euro 436 million. Building and upgrading service stations in Italy and upgrading of existing ones;outside Italy absorbed euro 172 million; and
(vii) upgrading of the fleet used in the Engineering & Construction division (euro 2,027 million).amounted to euro 1,630 million.

In 20082009, Eni successfully executed a number of strategic acquisitions and deals that are intended to strengthen its competitive position in its main markets. Total finance requirements for these acquisitions amounted to euro 4,305 million and mainly related tocompleted the acquisition of Distrigas corresponding to a 57.243% stake in Distrigas NV, the completiontotal investment of the acquisition of Burren Energy Plc, the purchases of certain upstream properties and gas storage assets, mainly in Algeria, in the North Sea and in India, as well as other investments in non-consolidated entities.euro 2,045 million.

In the 2009-2012During 2010-2013 four-year period, Eni expects to invest approximately euro 48.852.8 billion in capital expenditures and exploration projects to implement its growth strategy. For further details see "Item 5 – Management’s Expectationsstrategy, based on the assumptions discussed below under “Management’s Expectation of Operations"Operations”.

 

Trading Environment

  

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
Average price of Brent dated crude oil in U.S. dollars (1) 72.52 96.99 61.51
Average price of Brent dated crude oil in euro (2) 52.90 65.93 44.16
Average EUR/USD exchange rate (3) 1.371 1.471 1.393
Average European refining margin in U.S. dollars (4) 4.52 6.49 3.13
Euribor - three month euro rate % (3) 4.3 4.6 1.2
  
 
 

(1)Price per barrel. Source: Platt’s Oilgram.
(2)Price per barrel. Source: Eni’s calculations based on Platt’s Oilgram data for Brent prices and the EUR/USD exchange rate reported by the European Central Bank (ECB).
(3)Source: ECB.
(4)Price per barrel. FOB Mediterranean Brent dated crude oil. Source: Eni calculations based on Platt’s Oilgram data.

WheneverWhen the term margin is used in Item 5, "Margin" meansthe following discussion, it refers to the difference between the average selling price and direct acquisition cost of a finished product or raw material excluding other production costs (e.g. refining margin, margin on distribution of natural gas and petroleum products or margin of petrochemicals products). Margin trends reflect the trading environment and are, to a certain extent, a gauge of industry profitability.

  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
Average price of Brent dated crude oil in U.S. dollars (1) 65.14 72.52 96.99
Average price of Brent dated crude oil in euro (2) 51.86 52.90 65.93
Average EUR/USD exchange rate (3) 1.256 1.371 1.471
Average European refining margin in U.S. dollars (4) 3.79 4.52 6.49
Euribor - three month euro rate % (3) 3.1 4.3 4.6




(1)iPrice per barrel. Source: Platt’s Oilgram.
(2)iPrice per barrel. Source: Eni’s calculations based on Platt’s Oilgram data for Brent prices and the EUR/USD exchange rate reported by the European Central Bank (ECB).
(3)iSource: ECB.
(4)iPrice per barrel. FOB Mediterranean Brent dated crude oil. Source: Eni calculations based on Platt’s Oilgram data.

Eni’s results of operations and the year to year comparability of its financial results are affected by a number of external factors which exist in the industry environment, including changes in oil, natural gas and refined products prices, industry-wide movements in refining and petrochemical margins and fluctuations in exchange rates and interest rates. Changes in weather conditions from year to year can influence demand for natural gas and some petroleum products, thus affecting results of operations of the natural gas business and, to a lesser extent, of the refining and marketing business. See "Item 3 – Risk Factors".

99


In 2008,2009, Eni’s results were achieved in a trading environment characterized by an average 31.2% decrease in hydrocarbon realizations driven by declining Brent prices which were down 36.6% from 2008. Eni’s realized refining margins in dollar terms were sharply lower in the full year 2009, mirroring trends in Brent margins (down $3.4 per barrel, or 51.8%). A number of negative factors explained the reduction. Firstly, significantly compressed light-heavy crude differentials due to a significant increasereduction in Eni’s oil and gas realizations (up 28.1% on average)heavy crude availability on the backdrop of a favorable oil scenario until the month of September. Subsequently Brent prices experienced a steep decline from mid-year levels as a consequence of the financial crisis and the global economic downturn that has reduced energy demand. On average yearly Brent prices were up 33.7% from 2007. Management expects that oil prices will remain weak throughout the year 2009 as the economic downturn is expected to continue impacting global demand for oil, products and natural gas. Based on current market trends, management believes that there is still uncertainty about the timing of a recovery in global energy demand and in Brent prices. See "Item 3 – Risk Factors" for a description of sensitivity of Eni’s results of operations to changes in crude oil prices. In 2009 weak energy demand is expected to impact the Company’s gas sales in its downstream marketing business, particularly on the Italian market where the economic slowdown is expected to weigh heavily on gas demand. See "Item 5 – Management’s Expectations of Operations" below.

90


In 2008, margins on gas sales weremarketplace negatively affected by an unfavorable trading environment also reflecting exchange rate movements.

In 2008, refining activities were positively influenced by a strong margin environment (Brent refining margins were up 43.6%, to 6.49 $/BL). This positive trend was partly offset by a negative impact associated with narrowing differentials between light and heavy crudes that reduced the profitability of Eni’s complex refineries. This negative trend has been continuing inSecondly, the first quarter of 2009 as market availability of heavy crudes has been impactedindustry continued to be plagued by OPEC cuts.

In 2008, a steep decline was registered in selling margins of commodity chemicalsweak fundamentals due to higher supplyexcess capacity, high inventory levels and stagnant demand affecting end-prices, while feedstock costs of oil-based feedstock that were not fully recovered in sales prices and weak demand. Inhave been on an upward trend since the first quarter of 2009, resultsbeginning of the petrochemicalssecond half. Finally, middle-distillates margins plunged to historical lows. Results of operations for the year were negatively impactedhelped by the economic downturn that affected demand for commodity chemicals.

In 2008, the market environment was particularly favorable in the Engineering & Construction business as a result of the strong order pattern experienced throughout the year on the backdrop of the strong oil cycle. Management believes that falling oil prices, weak energy demand and tight financial markets will reduce the investment plans of oil companies thus affecting results of operations of oilfield contractors, even though with a time lag with respect to the oil companies’ investing decisions taking into account existing orders. In the first quarter 2009, Eni’s Engineering & Construction business reported positive results due to completion of orders in backlog and revenues associated with multi-years orders. Management expects that assuming that the Company will not incur any material order delay or cancellation, full-year results of the Engineering & Construction business will be positive in the full year 2009. In the medium-term, assuming a reduction in orders coming from oil companies, the results of the Engineering & Construction business will be supported by its ability to manage complex projects and large presence in strategic countries that make the business less vulnerable to the oil cycle.

In 2008, Eni’s results were negatively affected by the 7.3% appreciationdepreciation of the euro againstvs. the U.S. dollar, (based on the yearly average exchange rates)down by 5.3%.

 

Key Consolidated Financial Data

  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 

(euro million)

Net sales from operations   86,105 87,256 108,148
Operating profit   19,327 18,868 18,641
Net profit attributable to Eni   9,217 10,011 8,825
Net cash provided by operating activities   17,001 15,517 21,801
Capital expenditures   7,833 10,593 14,562
Acquisitions of investments and businesses   95 9,665 4,019
Shareholders’ equity including minority interest at year end   41,199 42,867 48,510
Net borrowings at year end (1)   6,767 16,327 18,376
Net profit per share attributable to Eni (basic and diluted) (euro per share) 2.49 2.73 2.43
Dividend per share (euro per share) 1.25 1.30 1.30
Net borrowings to total shareholders’ equity ratio including minority interest (leverage) (1)   0.16 0.38 0.38
  

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
  

(euro million)

Net sales from operations   87,204 108,082 83,227
Operating profit (1)   18,739 18,517 12,055
Net profit attributable to Eni   10,011 8,825 4,367
Net cash provided by operating activities   15,517 21,801 11,136
Capital expenditures   10,593 14,562 13,695
Acquisitions of investments and businesses (2)   9,909 4,305 2,323
Shareholders’ equity including minority interest at year end   42,867 48,510 50,051
Net borrowings at year end (2)   16,327 18,376 23,055
Net profit attributable to Eni basic and diluted (euro per share) 2.73 2.43 1.21
Dividend per share (euro per share) 1.30 1.30 1.00
Net borrowings to total shareholders’ equity ratio including minority interest (leverage) (3)   0.38 0.38 0.46
    
 
 

(1) 
From year 2009, the Company accounts gains and losses on non-hedging commodity derivative instruments, including both fair value remeasurement and settled transactions, as items of operating profit. Prior period results have been restated accordingly.
(2) 
This item includes acquired net borrowings.

(1)(3) For a discussion of the usefulness of and a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures with the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures see "Liquidity and Capital Resources – Financial Conditions" below.

 

Critical Accounting Estimates

The Company’scompany’s Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB.IFRS. These require the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses reported in the financial statements, as well as amounts included in the notes thereto, including discussion and disclosure of contingent liabilities. Estimates made are based on complex or subjective judgments and past experience of other assumptions deemed reasonable in consideration of the information available at the time. The accounting policies and areas that require the most significant judgments and estimates to be used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements are in relation to the accounting for oil and natural gas activities, specifically in the determination of proved and proved developed reserves, impairment of fixed assets, intangible assets and goodwill, asset retirement obligations, business combinations, pensions and other post-retirement benefits, recognition of

91


environmental liabilities and recognition of revenues in the oilfield services construction and engineering businesses. Although the Companycompany uses its best estimates and judgments, actual results could differ significantly from the estimates and assumptions used. A summary of significant estimates follows.

 

Oil and gas activities

Engineering estimates of the Company’s oil and gas reserves are inherently uncertain. Proved reserves are the estimated volumes of crude oil, natural gas and gas condensates, liquids and associated substances which geological and engineering data demonstrate that can be economically producible with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic conditions and operating conditions.methods. Although there are authoritative guidelines regarding the engineering criteria that must be met before estimated oil and gas reserves can be designated as "proved", the accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data and engineering and geological interpretation and judgment.

Field reserves will only be categorized as proved when all the criteria for

100


attribution of proved status have been met. At this stage, all booked reserves will be classified as proved undeveloped. Volumes will subsequently be reclassified from proved undeveloped to proved developed as a consequence of development activity. The first proved developed bookings will occur at the point of first oil or gas production. Major development projects typically take one to four years from the time of initial booking to the start of production. Eni reassesses its estimate of proved reserves periodically. The estimated proved reserves of oil and natural gas may be subject to future revision and upward and downward revision may be made to the initial booking of reserves due to production, reservoir performance, commercial factors, acquisition and divestment activity and additional reservoir development activity. In particular, changes in oil and natural gas prices could impact the amount of Eni’s proved reserves as regards the initial estimate and, in the case of Production-sharing agreements and buy-back contracts, the share of production and reserves to which Eni is entitled. Accordingly, the estimated reserves could be materially different from the quantities of oil and natural gas that ultimately will be recovered.

Oil and natural gas reserves have a direct impact on certain amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Estimated proved reserves are used in determining depreciation and depletion expenses and impairment expense. Depreciation rates on oil and gas assets using the UOP basis are determined from the ratio between the amount of hydrocarbons extracted in the quarter and proved developed reserves existing at the end of the quarter increased by the amounts extracted during the quarter.

Assuming all other variables are held constant, an increase in estimated proved developed reserves for each field decreases depreciation, depletion and amortization expense. Conversely, a decrease in estimated proved developed reserves increases depreciation, depletion and amortization expense. In addition, estimated proved reserves are used to calculate future cash flows from oil and gas properties, which serve as an indicator in determining whether or not property impairment is to be carried out. The larger the volume of estimated reserves, the lower the likelihood of asset impairments.impairment.

 

Impairment of assets

Eni assesses its tangible assets and intangible assets, including goodwill, for possible impairment if there are events or changes in circumstances that indicate the carrying values of the assets are not recoverable. Such indicators include changes in the Group’s business plans, changes in commodity prices leading to unprofitable performance, a reduced utilization of the plants and, for oil and gas properties, significant downward revisions of estimated proved reserve quantities or significant increase of the estimated development costs. Determination as to whether and how much an asset is impaired involves management estimates on highly uncertain matters such as future commodity prices, the effects of inflation and technology improvements on operating expenses, production profiles and the outlook for global or regional market supply and demand conditions for crude oil, natural gas, commodity chemicals and refined products. Similar remarks are valid for the physical recoverability of assets recognized in the balance sheet (deferred cost – see also item "Current assets") related to natural gas volumes not collected under long term purchase contracts with take-or-pay clauses.

The amount of an impairment loss is determined by comparing the book value of an asset with its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the greater of fair value net of disposal costs and value in use. The estimated value in use is based on the present values of expected future cash flows net of disposal costs. The expected future cash flows used for impairment reviews are based on judgmental assessments of future production volumes, prices and costs, considering available information at the date of review and are discounted by using a rate related to the activity involved.

For oil and natural gas properties, the expected future cash flows are estimated principally based on developed and non-developed proved reserves including, among other elements, production taxes and the costs to be incurred for the reserves yet to be developed. The estimated future level of production is based on assumptions relating toconcerning: future commodity prices, lifting and development costs, field decline rates, market demand and supply, economic regulatory climates and other factors.

92


Oil, natural gas and petroleum products prices used to quantify the expected future cash flows are estimated based on forward prices prevailing in the marketplace for the first four years and management’s long-term planning assumptions thereafter.

The estimate of the future amount of production is based on assumptions related to the commodity future prices, lifting and development costs, market demand and to other factors. The discount rate reflects the current market valuation of the time value of money and of the specific risks of the asset not reflected in the estimate of the future cash flows.

Goodwill and other intangible assets with an indefinite useful life are not subject to amortization. The Companycompany tests such assets at the cash generatingcash-generating unit level for impairment on an annual basis and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value below its carrying amount. In particular, goodwill impairment is based on the determination of the fair value of each cash generating unit to which goodwill can be attributed on a reasonable and consistent basis.

A cash generating unit is the smallest aggregate unit on which the Company,company, directly or indirectly, evaluates the return on the capital expenditure. If the recoverable amount of a cash generating unit is lower than the carrying

101


amount, goodwill attributed to that cash generating unit is impaired up to that difference; if the carrying amount of goodwill is less than the amount of impairment, assets of the cash generating unit are impaired on a pro-rata basis for the residual difference.

 

Asset Retirement Obligations

Obligations to remove tangible equipment and restore land or seabed require significant estimates in calculating the amount of the obligation and determining the amount required to be recorded presently in the consolidated financial statements. Estimating future asset retirement obligations is complex. It requires management to make estimates and judgments with respect to removal obligations that will come to term many years into the future and contracts and regulations are often unclear as to what constitutes removal.

In addition, the ultimate financial impact of environmental laws and regulations is not always clearly known as asset removal technologies and costs constantly evolve in the countries where Eni operates, as do political, environmental, safety and public expectations. The subjectivity of these estimates is also increased by the accounting method used that requires entities to record the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period when it is incurred (typically, at the time the asset is installed at the production location).

When liabilities are initially recorded, the related fixed assets are increased by an equal corresponding amount. The liabilities are increased with the passage of time (i.e. interest accretion) and any change in the estimates following the modification of future cash flows and discount rate adopted. The recognized asset retirement obligations are based on future retirement cost estimates and incorporate many assumptions such as: expected recoverable quantities of crude oil and natural gas, abandonment time, future inflation rates and the risk-free rate of interest adjusted for the Company’s credit costs.

 

Business Combinations

Accounting for business combinations requires the allocation of the purchase price to the various assets and liabilities of the acquired business at their respective fair values. Any positive residual difference is recognized as "Goodwill". Negative residual differences are credited to the profit and loss account. Management uses all available information to make these fair value determinations and, for major business acquisitions, typically engages an independent appraisal firm to assist in the fair value determination of the acquired assets and liabilities.

 

Environmental liabilities

Together with other companies in the industries in which it operates, Eni is subject to numerous EU, national, regional and local environmental laws and regulations concerning its oil and gas operations, production and other activities. They include legislations that implement international conventions or protocols. Environmental costs are recognized when it becomes probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Management, considering the actions already taken, insurance policies to cover environmental risks and provision for risks accrued, does not expect any material adverse effect on Eni’s consolidated results of operations and financial position as a result of such laws and regulations. However, there can be no assuranceit is possible that there will not bethe Company may incur environmental costs and liabilities in addition to amounts already accrued in the financial statements, which could possibly have a material adverse impact on Eni’s consolidated results of operations and financial position due to:

(i) the possibility of an unknown contamination;
(ii) the results of the ongoing surveys and other possible effects of statements required by Decree No. 471/1999 of the Ministry of Environment concerning the remediation of contaminated sites;

93


(iii) the possible effects of future environmental legislations and rules;
(iv) the effects of possible technological changes relating to future remediation; and
(v) the possibility of litigation and the difficulty of determining Eni’s liability, if any, as against other potentially responsible parties with respect to such litigations and the possible insurance recoveries.

 

Employee benefits

Defined benefit plans and other long-term benefits are evaluated with reference to uncertain events and based upon actuarial assumptions including among others discount rates, expected rates of return on plan assets, expected rates of salary increases, medical cost trends, estimated retirement dates and mortality rates. The significant assumptions used to account for pensions and other post-retirement benefits are determined as follows:

102


(i) discount and inflation rates reflect the rates at which benefits could be effectively settled, taking into account the duration of the obligation. Indicators used in selecting the discount rate include rates of annuity contracts and rates of return on high quality fixed-income investments. The inflation rates reflect market conditions observed country by country;
(ii) the future salary levels of the individual employees are determined including an estimate of future changes attributed to general price levels (consistent with inflation rate assumptions), productivity, seniority and promotion;
(iii) healthcare cost trend assumptions reflect an estimate of the actual future changes in the cost of the healthcare related benefits provided to the plan participants and are based on past and current healthcare cost trends including healthcare inflation, changes in healthcare utilization and changes in health status of the participants;
(iv) demographic assumptions such as mortality, disability and turnover reflect the best estimate of these future events for individual employees involved, based principally on available actuarial data; and
(v) determination of the expected rates of return on assets is made through compound averaging. For each plan, the distribution of investments among bonds, equities and cash and their specific average expected rate of return is taken into account. Differences between expected and actual costs and between the expected return and the actual return on plan assets routinely occur and are called actuarial gains and losses. Eni applies the corridor method to amortize its actuarial losses and gains.

Eni applies the corridor method to amortize its actuarial losses and gains. This method amortizes on a pro-rata basis the net cumulative unrecognized actuarial gains and losses at the end of the previous reporting period that exceed 10% of the greater of: (i) the present value of the defined benefit obligation; and (ii) the fair value of plan assets, over the average expected remaining working lives of the employees participating in the plan.

Additionally, obligations for other long-term benefits are determined by adopting actuarial assumptions. The effect of changes in actuarial assumptions or a change in the characteristics of the benefit are taken to profit or loss in their entirety.

 

Contingencies

In addition to accruing the estimated costs for environmental liabilities, asset retirement obligationsobligation and employee benefits, Eni accrues for all contingencies that are both probable and reasonably estimable. These other contingencies are primarily related to litigation and tax issues. Determining appropriate amounts for accrual is a complex estimation process that includes subjective judgments.

 

Revenue recognition in the Engineering & Construction segment

Revenue recognition in the Engineering & Construction segment is based on the stage of completion of a contract as measured on the cost-to-cost basis applied to contractual revenues. Use of the stage of completion method requires estimates of future gross profit on a contract by contract basis. The future gross profit represents the profit remaining after deducting costs attributable to the contract from revenues provided for in the contract. The estimate of future gross profit is based on a complex estimation process that includes identification of risks related to the geographical region, market conditions in that region and any assessment that is necessary to estimate with sufficient precision the total future costs as well as the expected timetable.

Requests forof additional income, deriving from a change in the scope of work, are included in the total amount of revenues when it is probable that the customer will approve the variation and the related amount. Claims deriving from additional costs incurred for reasons attributable to the client are included in the total amount of revenues when it is probable that the counterparty will accept them.

94

103


2006-20082007-2009 Group Results of Operations

Overview of the Profit and Loss Account for Three Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 20082009

The table below sets forth a summary of Eni’s profit and loss account for the periods indicated. All line items included in the table below are derived from the Consolidated Financial Statements prepared in accordance with IFRS.

 

Year ended December 31,


  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
  

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
 

(euro million)

Net sales from operations 86,105 87,256 108,148  87,204 108,082 83,227 
Other income and revenues (1) 783 827 720  833 728 1,118 
 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenues 86,888 88,083 108,868  88,037 108,810 84,345 
Operating expenses (61,140) (61,979) (80,412) (61,933) (80,354) (62,532)
Other operating income (expense) (2) (129) (124) 55 
Depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairments (6,421) (7,236) (9,815) (7,236) (9,815) (9,813)
 

 

 

 

 

 

OPERATING PROFIT 19,327 18,868 18,641  18,739 18,517 12,055 
Finance income (expense) 161 (83) (764) 46 (640) (551)
Income from investments 903 1,243 1,373 
Income (expense) from investments 1,243 1,373 569 
 

 

 

 

 

 

PROFIT BEFORE INCOME TAXES 20,391 20,028 19,250  20,028 19,250 12,073 
Income taxes (10,568) (9,219) (9,692) (9,219) (9,692) (6,756)
 

 

 

 

 

 

NET PROFIT 9,823 10,809 9,558  10,809 9,558 5,317 
Attributable to:              
- Eni 9,217 10,011 8,825  10,011 8,825 4,367 
- minority interest 606 798 733  798 733 950 
 

 

 

 

 

 


(1)iIncludes, among other things, contract penalties, income from contract cancellations, gains on disposal of mineral rights and other fixed assets, compensation for damages and indemnities and other income.
(2)From year 2009, the Company accounts gains and losses on non-hedging commodity derivative instruments, including both fair value re-measurement and settled transactions, as items of operating profit. Prior period results have been restated accordingly.

The table below sets forth certain income statement items as a percentage of net sales from operations for the periods indicated.

 

Year ended December 31,

  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
 (%)
Operating expenses 71.0  71.0  74.4 
Depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairments 7.5  8.3  9.1 
OPERATING PROFIT 22.4  21.6  17.2 
  

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
  

(%)

Operating expenses 71.0 74.3 75.1
Depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairments 8.3 9.1 11.8
OPERATING PROFIT 21.5 17.1 14.5
  
 
 

2009 compared to 2008. Net profit pertaining to Eni in 2009 was euro 4,367 million, a decrease of euro 4,458 million from 2008, or 50.5%. This decrease was affected by the following factors:

(i) 
a decreased operating profit reported by the Exploration & Production and Gas & Power segments due to lower oil and gas prices and a weaker gas demand. The Group results were also affected by higher amortization charges taken in connection with new investments. Those negatives were partly offset by recognition of lower inventory write-downs and impairments of property, plant and equipment particularly in the Refining & Marketing and Petrochemical segments. As a result, the Group consolidated operating profit was down euro 6,462 million, or 34.9%, from a year ago;
(ii) 
lower profit (down euro 804 million) from non consolidated entities that are accounted for under the equity or the cost method; and
(iii)a higher consolidated tax rate up from 50.3% to 56% (up 5.7 percentage points), mainly due to new tax rules both in Italy and outside Italy which impacted taxes currently payable, charges accounted in the year which were excluded from tax calculations, and the circumstance that in 2008 the tax rate benefited from certain tax gains associated with an adjustment to deferred taxation amounting to euro 733 million as new tax provisions came into effect pertaining to both Italian and foreign subsidiaries.

104


2008 compared to 20072007. . Net profit pertaining to Eni in 2008 was euro 8,825 million, representing a decrease of euro 1,186 million from 2007, downor 11.8%. This decrease was affected by the following negative factors.factors:

(i) Higherhigher finance expenses (up euro 681686 million) were recorded mainly reflecting losses of euro 577 million incurred on fair value valuation of certain derivative financial instruments that do not meet the formal criteria to be qualified as hedges under IFRS.IFRS (down euro 582 million). Additionally, higher finance charges on finance debt were incurred as a result of increased average net borrowings and higher interest rates on euro denominated finance debt (Euribor up 0.3 percentage points) partially offset by lower interest rates on dollar loans (Libor down 2.4 percentage points).;
(ii) An increase in income taxes ofwere recorded (up euro 473 millionmillion) mainly due to increased income taxes currently payable recorded by subsidiaries in the Exploration & Production division operating outside Italy, partly offset by a positive adjustment to deferred taxation associated with new tax rules effective from January 1, 2008 applicable to Italian companies and Libyan activities (for more details on these items see "Taxation""taxation" below).; and
(iii) Aa decrease in operating profit, ofdown euro 227222 million, mainly due to the weaker operating performance reported by Eni’s downstream businesses, partly offset by an improved performance in the Exploration & Production segment driven by the strong pricing environment experienced until September 2008.

These negative factors were partly offset by higher profit from non consolidated entities that are accounted for under the equity or the cost method, up euro 130 million.

2007 compared to 2006. Net profit pertaining to Eni in 2007 was euro 10,011 million with a euro 794 million increase from 2006 (8.6%), primarily due to:

95


(i)lower income taxes (down euro 1,349 million) mainly reflecting:
-an adjustment to deferred tax assets and liabilities for Italian subsidiaries amounting to euro 394 million relating to certain amendments to the Italian tax regime, including a lower statutory tax rate, enacted by the 2008 Budget Law, and
-the circumstance that in 2006 deferred tax liabilities were recorded due to changes in the fiscal regimes of Algeria and the United Kingdom and charges regarding disputes on certain tax matters (totaling euro 347 million);
(ii)an increase in net income from investments of euro 340 million, mainly due to net gains on the divestment of interests in certain associates of the Engineering & Construction segment and higher earnings from entities that are accounted for under the equity or the cost method; and
(iii)a gain of euro 83 million deriving from a reduction in the provision accrued for post-retirement benefits for Italian employees following changes in applicable regulation (the so called curtailment of the provision for post retirement benefits). Effective January 1, 2007, Italian laws modified Italian post-retirement benefits scheme from a defined benefit plan to a defined contribution one. Following this, the provision for Italian employees was reassessed to take account of the exclusion of future salaries and relevant increases from actuarial calculations.

These positive factors were partly offset by a lower operating profit (down euro 459 million) mainly in the Exploration & Production segment (euro 1,792 million) and higher net finance charges (euro 244 million).

 

Discontinued Operations

Discontinued operations in 2009, 2008 2007 and 20062007 were immaterial.

 

Analysis of the Line Items of the Profit and Loss Account

a) Total Revenues

Eni’s total revenues were euro 108,86884,345 million, euro 88,083108,810 million and euro 86,88888,037 million infor the year ended December 31, 2009, 2008 2007 and 2006,2007, respectively. Total revenues consist of net sales from operations and other income and revenues. Eni’s net sales from operations amounted to euro 108,14883,227 million, euro 87,256108,082 million and euro 86,10587,204 million infor the year ended December 31, 2009, 2008 2007 and 2006,2007, respectively, and its other income and revenues totaled euro 7201,118 million, euro 827728 million and euro 783833 million, respectively, in these periods.

105


Net sales from operations

The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the net sales from operations generated by each of Eni’s business segments including intra-group sales, together with consolidated net sales from operations.

 

Year ended December 31,

  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
 (euro million)
Exploration & Production 27,173  27,278  33,318 
Gas & Power 28,368  27,633  36,936 
Refining & Marketing 38,210  36,401  45,083 
Petrochemicals 6,823  6,934  6,303 
Engineering & Construction 6,979  8,678  9,176 
Other activities 823  205  185 
Corporate and financial companies 1,174  1,313  1,331 
Impact of unrealized intragroup profit elimination       75 
Consolidation adjustment (1) (23,445) (21,186) (24,259)
  

 

 

NET SALES FROM OPERATIONS 86,105  87,256  108,148 
  

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
  


(euro million)

Exploration & Production (1) 26,920  33,042  23,801 
Gas & Power (1) 27,793  37,062  30,447 
Refining & Marketing (2) 36,349  45,017  31,769 
Petrochemicals 6,934  6,303  4,203 
Engineering & Construction 8,678  9,176  9,664 
Other activities 205  185  88 
Corporate and financial companies 1,313  1,331  1,280 
Impact of unrealized intragroup profit elimination    75  (66)
Consolidation adjustment (3) (20,988) (24,109) (17,959)
  

 

 

NET SALES FROM OPERATIONS 87,204  108,082  83,227 
  

 

 


(1) Intra-groupFrom January 1, 2009, results of the gas storage business, which were previously reported within the Exploration & Production segment, are reported within the Gas & Power segment reporting unit, following restructuring of Eni regulated gas businesses in Italy. As of that date, the results of the regulated businesses in Italy therefore include results of the Transport, Distribution, Regasification and Storage activities in Italy. Prior period results have been restated accordingly.
(2)From January 1, 2009 Eni adopted IFRIC 13 "Customer Loyalty Programs" which requires that the award points granted to clients within the related loyalty programs be accounted as a separate component of the basic transaction, evaluated at their fair value and recognized as revenues when effectively used. Prior period results have been restated accordingly.
(3)Intragroup sales are included in net sales from operations in order to give a more meaningful indication aboutas to the volume of the activities to which sales from operations by segment may be related. The most substantial intra-groupintragroup sales are recorded by the Exploration & Production segment. See Note 3635 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a breakdown of intra-groupintragroup sales by segment for the reported years.

2009 compared to 2008. Eni’s net sales from operations (revenues) for 2009 (euro 83,227 million) were down euro 24,855 million, or 23% from 2008, primarily reflecting lower realizations on oil, products and natural gas in dollar terms and lower sales volumes. These negatives were partly offset by the positive impact of the depreciation of the euro versus the dollar (down 5.3%).

Revenues generated by the Exploration & Production division (euro 23,801 million) decreased by euro 9,241 million, or 28% from 2008, mainly due to lower realizations in dollars (oil down 32.2%; natural gas down 29.8%) reflecting a trading environment that was particularly adverse in the first nine months and the impact of energy parameters on gas prices and a fall in gas spot prices. This decrease reflected also lower sales volumes (down 9.2 million BOE, or 1.5%). These negatives were partly offset by the depreciation of the euro vs. the U.S. dollar.

Revenues generated by the Gas & Power division (euro 30,447 million) decreased by euro 6,615 million, or 17.8% from 2008, mainly due to lower gas prices reflecting trends in energy parameters, as well as lower volumes sold in Italy (down 12.8 BCM, or 24.2%) due to the impact of the economic downturn. These negatives were partly offset by increased sales outside Italy due to contribution of the Distrigas acquisition (up 12.02 BCM).

Revenues generated by the Refining & Marketing division (euro 31,769 million) decreased by euro 13,248 million, or 29.4% from 2008, reflecting lower product prices and lower sales volumes (down 10%), that were partially offset by the impact of the depreciation of the euro vs. the dollar.

Revenues generated by the Petrochemical division (euro 4,203 million) decreased by euro 2,100 million, or 33.3% from 2008, mainly reflecting lower sales prices (down 26%) due to lower international prices for crude oil and refined products and a decline in volumes sold due to lower end-markets demand that was driven down by the economic downturn.

Revenues generated by the Engineering & Construction business (euro 9,664 million) increased by euro 488 million, or 5.3% from 2008, as a result of the large number of oil & gas projects that were started during the upward phase of the oil cycle.

2008 compared to 2007. Eni’s net sales from operations (revenues) for 2008 (euro 108,148108,082 million) were up euro 20,89220,878 million from 2007, or 23.9%, primarily reflecting higher realizations on oil, products and natural gas in dollar terms and higher natural gas sales volumes due to the acquisition of Distrigas. These positives were partially offset by the impact of 7.3%the appreciation of the euro versus the dollar on average during the period.(up 7.3%).

96106


Revenues generated by the Exploration & Production division (euro 33,31833,042 million) increased by euro 6,0406,122 million, or 22.1%,22.7% from 2007, mainly due to higher realizations of oil and gas in dollar termsdollars (oil up 24.2%, natural gas up 47.8%). Eni’s liquid realizations (84.05 $/BL)BBL) were affected by the settlement of certain commodity derivatives relating to the sale of 46 mmBBL in the year, with a negative impact of 4.13 $/BL$4.13 per barrel (for a more detailed explanation about this issue see the discussion on results of the Exploration & Production division below). Revenue increases in 2008 were also driven by higher production volumes soldgrowth (up 20.1 mmBOE, or 3.3%). These improvements were partially offset by the appreciation of the euro against the dollar.

Revenues generated by the Gas & Power division (euro 36,93637,062 million) increased by euro 9,3039,269 million, up 33.7%,or 33.4% from 2007, mainly due to higher average natural gas prices reflecting trends in energy parameters to which gas prices are contractually indexed, as well as increased international sales due to the contribution of the acquisition of Distrigas and organic growth recorded in European target markets, partly offset by lower volumes sold in Italy due to the impact of the economic downturn and competitive pressure.

Revenues generated by the Refining & Marketing division (euro 45,08345,017 million) increased by euro 8,6828,668 million, up 23.9%,or 23.8% from 2007, mainly due to higher international prices for oil and products and higher product volumes sold (up 1.1%) partly offset by the impact of the appreciation of the euro over the dollar.

Revenues generated by the Petrochemical division (euro 6,303 million) decreased by euro 631 million, downor 9.1%, from 2007, mainly reflecting a decline in volumes sold (down 15%) due to weaker demand.

Revenues generated by the Engineering & Construction division (euro 9,176 million) increased by euro 498 million, upor 5.7%, from 2007, due to increased activity levels.

2007 compared to 2006. Eni’s net sales from operations (revenues) for 2007 (euro 87,256 million) were up euro 1,151 million, a 1.3% increase from 2006, primarily reflecting higher activity levels in the Engineering & Construction division and higher realizations on oil and natural gas in dollar terms, partially offset by the impact of the appreciation of the euro versus the dollar (up 9.2%), a decline in hydrocarbon production sold and lower products volumes sold, as well as the negative trends of energy parameters to which gas prices are contractually indexed in the Gas & Power division.

Revenues generated by the Exploration & Production division (euro 27,278 million) increased by euro 105 million, up 0.4%, mainly due to higher oil realizations in dollars (up 12.7%), partially offset by to the impact of the appreciation of the euro versus the dollar and lower hydrocarbon production sold (down 14.7 mmBOE, or 2.2%).

Revenues generated by the Gas & Power division (euro 27,633 million) declined by euro 735 million, down 2.6%, mainly due to lower average natural gas prices reflecting negative trends in energy parameters to which gas prices are contractually indexed and a negative shift in the mix of volumes sold.

Revenues generated by the Refining & Marketing division (euro 36,401 million) declined by euro 1,809 million, down 4.7%, mainly due to the effect of the appreciation of the euro over the dollar and lower product volumes marketed (down 0.98 mmtonnes), partly offset by higher international prices for oil and products.

Revenues generated by the Petrochemical division (euro 6,934 million) increased by euro 111 million from 2006, up 1.6%, reflecting mainly the fact that performance in 2006 was adversely impacted by the unplanned downtime of the Priolo craker and downstream plants as a consequence of an accident that occurred at the nearby refinery in April 2006, resulting in a recovery in production volumes sold (up 4.5%). Commodity chemicals prices were also up by 4% on average.

Revenues generated by the Engineering & Construction division (euro 8,678 million) increased by euro 1,699 million, up 24.3%, due to increased activity levels in the Offshore and Onshore construction businesses.

Revenues generated by the Other activities division decreased by euro 618 million to euro 205 million, due to the intragroup divestment of the Porto Torres plant for the production of basic petrochemical products to Polimeri Europa, which occurred in 2007.

97


b) Operating Expenses

The table below sets forth the components of Eni’s operating expenses for the periods indicated.

 

Year ended December 31,

  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
 

(euro million)


Purchases, services and other 57,490 58,179 76,408
Payroll and related costs 3,650 3,800 4,004
Operating expenses 61,140 61,979 80,412
  

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
  


(euro million)

Purchases, services and other 58,133 76,350 58,351
Payroll and related costs 3,800 4,004 4,181
Operating expenses 61,933 80,354 62,532
  
 
 

2009 compared to 2008. Operating expenses for 2009 (euro 62,532 million) were down euro 17,822 million from 2008, or 22.2%, reflecting primarily lower supply costs of purchased oil, gas and petrochemical feedstocks, partially offset by the depreciation of the euro against the dollar. Purchases, services and other included environmental and other risk provisions, impairments of certain current and non-current assets, other than tangible and intangible assets, amounting to euro 537 million. They also included a charge amounting to euro 250 million which was estimated on the basis of the possible resolution of an investigation related to the TSKJ consortium based on the current status of the ongoing discussions with U.S. Authorities.

Payroll and related costs (euro 4,181 million) increased by euro 177 million from 2008 (up 4.4%) mainly due to higher unit labor cost in Italy and outside Italy, partly due to exchange rate translation differences, the increase in the average number of employees outside Italy, following the consolidation of Distrigas in the Gas & Power division, increased personnel in the Engineering & Construction and Exploration & Production businesses due to higher activity levels, as well as increased provisions for redundancy incentives. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in the average number of employees in Italy.

2008 compared to 20072007.. Operating expenses for 2008 (euro 80,41280,354 million) were upincreased by euro 18,43318,412 million from 2007, or 29.7%, reflecting primarily higher purchase prices of natural gas as well as higher prices for refinery and petrochemical feedstock due to market trends in oil commodities and rising dollar-denominated operating expenses in the Exploration & Production division due to full consolidation of acquired assets and the impact of sector-specific inflation, mainly in the first nine months of the year.inflation. Those increases were partly offset by the appreciation of the euro over the dollar.

Payroll and related costs (euro 4,004 million) were up euro 204 million, or 5.4%, mainly due to higher unit labor cost in Italy and an increase in the average number of employees outside Italy that was recorded mainly in the Exploration & Production, division, following the consolidation of acquired assets, as well as increased personnel in the

107


Engineering & Construction business due to higher volumes. In addition in 2007 a non-recurring gain of euro 83 million was recorded in connection with the curtailment of the provision for post-retirement benefits relating to obligations towards Italian employees. These increases were partly offset by exchange rate translation differences.

2007 compared to 2006. Operating expenses for 2007 (euro 61,979 million) increased by euro 839 million from 2006, up 1.4%, mainly due to higher purchase prices for refinery and petrochemical feedstock, as well as rising dollar-denominated operating expenses in the Exploration & Production segment, partly offset by the appreciation of the euro against the dollar. Purchases, services and other include: (i) an expense of euro 91 million relating to a provision against ongoing antitrust proceedings before the European authorities net of a gain deriving from the reversal of a previously accrued provisions upon favorable developments in certain antitrust proceedings; and (ii) environmental charges (euro 327 million), recognized particularly by Syndial and the Refining & Marketing segment.

Payroll and related costs (euro 3,800 million) increased by euro 150 million, up 4.1%, mainly due to higher unit labor costs and an increase in the average number of employees outside Italy in the Engineering & Construction segment related to higher activity levels and in the Exploration & Production segment due to the acquisition of assets. These increases were offset in part by exchange rate translation differences and a gain (euro 83 million) deriving from the curtailment of the provision for post-retirement benefits existing at year-end 2006 related to obligations towards Italian employees.

98


c) Depreciation, Depletion, Amortization and Impairments

The table below sets forth a breakdown of depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairments by business segment for the periods indicated.

 

Year ended December 31,


  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
  

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
 

(euro million)

Exploration & Production (1) 4,646 5,483 6,733  5,431 6,678 6,789 
Gas & Power 687 687 742  739 797 981 
Refining & Marketing 434 433 430  433 430 408 
Petrochemicals 124 116 117  116 117 83 
Engineering & Construction 195 248 335  248 335 433 
Other activities 6 4 3  4 3 2 
Corporate and financial companies 70 68 76  68 76 83 
Impact of unrealized intragroup profit elimination (2) (9) (10) (14) (10) (14) (17)
 

 

 

 

 

 

Total depreciation, depletion and amortization 6,153 7,029 8,422  7,029 8,422 8,762 
Impairments 268 207 1,393  207 1,393 1,051 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 6,421 7,236 9,815  7,236 9,815 9,813 
 

 

 

 

 

 


(1)iExploratory expenditures of euro 2,0571,551 million, euro 1,7782,057 million and euro 1,0751,778 million are included in these amounts relative to the years 2009, 2008 2007 and 2006,2007, respectively.
(2)iThis item concerned mainly intra-group sales of commodities,goods, services and capital goodsassets recorded at period end in the assetsequity of the purchasing business segment as of end of the period.segment.

2009 compared to 2008. In 2009 depreciation, depletion and amortization charges (euro 8,762 million) increased by euro 340 million, or 4% from 2008, mainly in: (i) the Gas & Power division (up euro 184 million) reflecting consolidation of assets acquired and entry into service of new investments; and (ii) the Exploration & Production segment (up euro 111 million) where higher charges were associated with the depreciation of the euro against the dollar, rising development activities reflecting consolidation of acquired oil & gas properties and increased expenditures to develop new complex fields and projects. These negatives were partly offset by lower exploration expenses. The Engineering & Construction segment also increased amortization charges in connection with the entry into service of new assets.

In 2009, impairments (euro 1,051 million) which were down euro 342 million, mainly related to: (i) impairment charges recorded on proved and unproved properties in the Exploration & Production division due to downward reserve revisions and cost increases mainly recorded in the Gulf of Mexico, Australia, Congo and Egypt; (ii) refinery plants due to expectations of poor refining margins reflecting the industry weak fundamentals and plants’ specific factors such as low complexity. Also impairments of goodwill were recognized on marketing assets acquired in Central-Eastern Europe and certain other marketing assets in the Refining & Marketing division, in the light of a downsizing of growth expectations on certain markets; and (iii) a number of plants in the Petrochemical division due to a weak outlook for pricing/margins as a result of lower petrochemical products demand, excess capacity and higher competitive pressures.

2008 compared to 20072007.. In 2008 depreciation, depletion and amortization charges (euro 8,422 million) increased by euro 1,393 million, upor 19.8%, from 2007, mainly in the Exploration & Production segment (up euro 1,2501,247 million)., The higher charges incurred in the Exploration & Production segment were associated with: (i) increasedrising development amortization charges reflecting consolidation of assets acquired and increased expenditures to develop new fields and to sustain production performance at mature fields; and (ii) higher exploration expenditures that are expensed in full when incurred (euro 420 million). These increasesnegatives were partly offset by the appreciation of the euro against the dollar.

In 2008, impairments (euro 1,393 million) mainly regarded proved and unproved mineral properties in the Exploration & Production division due to changes in the regulatory and contractual framework for certain properties, cost increases, as well as a changed pricing environment. The value ofA number of plants and equipmentequipments in the

108


Refining & Marketing and Petrochemical divisions were impaired due to a downward revision of the future profitability associated with worsening expectations for the future pricing/margin environment. For more information about the main assumptions used by the Company in testing the recoverability of the carrying amounts of its property, plant and equipment see "Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements".

2007 compared to 2006. In 2007 depreciation, depletion and amortization charges (euro 7,029 million) increased by euro 876 million, or 14.2%, from 2006 mainly in the Exploration & Production segment (up euro 837 million) related to higher exploratory expenditures (euro 703 million), the consolidation of activities acquired in the Gulf of Mexico and Congo and the impact on amortization charges of an estimated update of asset retirement obligations for certain Italian and U.S. fields carried out in the preparation of 2006 consolidated financial statements, offset in part by exchange rate differences.

In 2007 impairment charges amounted to euro 207 million mainly regarding mineral assets in the Exploration & Production segment and plants and equipment in the Refining & Marketing segment.

99


d) Operating Profit by Segment

The table below sets forth Eni’s operating profit by business segment for the periods indicated.

 

Year ended December 31,


  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
  

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
 

(euro million)

Exploration & Production(1) 15,580 13,788 16,415  13,433 16,239 9,120 
Gas & Power(1) 3,802 4,127 3,933  4,465 4,030 3,687 
Refining & Marketing 319 729 (1,023) 686 (988) (102)
Petrochemicals 172 74 (822) 100 (845) (675)
Engineering & Construction 505 837 1,045  837 1,045 881 
Other activities (622) (444) (346) (444) (346) (382)
Corporate and financial companies (296) (217) (686) (312) (743) (474)
Impact of intragroup profits elimination (133) (26) 125  (26) 125   
 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating profit(2) 19,327 18,868 18,641  18,739 18,517 12,055 
 

 

 

 

 

 


(1)From January 1, 2009, results of the gas storage business, which were previously reported within the Exploration & Production segment, are reported within the Gas & Power segment reporting unit, following restructuring of Eni regulated gas businesses in Italy. As of that date, the results of the regulated businesses in Italy therefore include results of the Transport, Distribution, Re-gasification and Storage activities in Italy. Prior period results have been restated accordingly.
(2)From year 2009, the Company accounts gains and losses on non-hedging commodity derivatives instruments, including both fair value re-measurement and settled transactions, as items of operating profit. Prior period results have been restated accordingly.

The table below sets forth operating profit for each of Eni’s principal business segments as a percentage of each segment’s net sales from operations (including intragroup sales) for the periods presented.

 

Year ended December 31,


  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
  

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
 

(%)

Exploration & Production 57.3 50.5 49.3  49.9 49.1 38.3 
Gas & Power 13.4 14.9 10.6  16.1 10.9 12.1 
Refining & Marketing 0.8 2.0 (2.3) 1.9 (2.2) (0.3)
Petrochemicals 2.5 1.1 (13.0) 1.4 (13.4) (16.1)
Engineering & Construction 7.2 9.6 11.4  9.6 11.4 9.1 
Other activities (216.6) (187.0) (434.1)
Corporate and financial companies (23.8) (55.8) (37.0)
 

 

 

 

 

 

Group 22.4 21.6 17.2  21.5 17.1 14.5 
 

 

 

 

 

 

Exploration & Production. Operating profit in 2009 amounted to euro 9,120 million, down euro 7,119 million from 2008, or 43.8%, reflecting lower realizations in dollars (oil down 32.2%; natural gas down 29.8%), and reduced production sales volumes (down 9.2 mmBOE, or 1.5%). These negatives were partly offset by: (i) positive currency translation differences which were reported by subsidiaries which adopted the U.S. dollar as functional currency, as the euro depreciated on average by 5.3%. This had an estimated positive impact of euro 500 million; (ii) recognition of lower asset impairments (down euro 234 million); and (iii) gains recorded on the divestment of certain exploration and production assets as part of the agreements signed with Suez.

Liquids and gas realizations for the year decreased on average by 31.2% in dollar terms driven by lower oil prices for market benchmarks (Brent crude price decreased by 36.6%), partly offset by an improved product mix of Eni’s crudes (down 32.2%). Average oil realizations were barely unchanged, due to the settlement of certain non-strategic commodity derivatives relating to the sale of 42.2 mmBBL.

109


In 2009, the impact of those cash flow hedges was immaterial as the increase in liquids realizations by $0.45 per barrel as a result of the sale of 31.6 mmBBL at the hedged price recorded in the first nine months was absorbed by a reduction on average by $1.46 per barrel from the sale of 10.6 mmBBL in the fourth quarter, reflecting the inversion in oil prices trends. The derivatives were entered into to hedge exposure to fluctuations in future cash flows expected from the sale of a portion of the Company’s proved reserves, in connection with the acquisition of oil and gas assets in Congo and in the Gulf of Mexico. When entered into, those hedging transactions originally covered an amount of approximately 125.7 mmBBL in the 2008-2011 period, which by the end of 2009 has decreased to approximately 37.5 mmBBL.

In 2009 average gas realizations were down 29.8%, driven by time-lags between movements in oil prices and their effect on gas prices pursuant to pricing formulae and by weak spot prices.

Liquid realizations and the impact of commodity derivatives were as follows:

Full Year


  

2008

 

2009

  
 
Sales volumes (mmBBL) 364.30  373.50 
Sales volumes hedged by derivatives (cash flow hedge)   46.00  42.20 
Total price per barrel, excluding derivatives ($/BBL) 88.17  56.98 
Realized gains (losses) on derivatives   (4.13) (0.03)
Total average price per barrel   84.05  56.95 
    

 

Operating profit in 2008 amounted to euro 16,41516,239 million, up euro 2,6272,806 million from 2007, or 19.1%20.9%, reflecting higher realizations of oil and gas in dollar termsdollars (oil up 24.2%; natural gas up 47.8%) and increased production sales volumes (up 20.1 mmBOE) due to the contribution of assets acquired in the Gulf of Mexico, Congo and Turkmenistan.. These increasespositives were partly offset by: (i) the recognition of significantly higher asset impairments (euro 810(down euro 667 million) due to changes in the regulatory and contractual framework for certain properties, cost increases, as well as a changed pricing environment; (ii) a negative impact on the translation to euro of the operating profit reported by subsidiaries whosewhich functional currency is the U.S. dollar as the euro appreciated on average by 7.3%, with an estimated negative impact of euro 1,200 million; (iii) rising operating costs reflecting the impact of sector-specific inflation and higher amortization and depreciation charges, due to the consolidation of acquired assets and higher costs incurredincreased expenditures to develop new fields and to sustain production performance at mature fields; and (iv) increased exploration expenses (euro 420 million on a constant basis exchange rate basis) in connection with higher geological and geophysical expenses and increased exploratory drilling expenditures that are expensedamortized in full as incurred.

Liquids and gas realizations for the year increased on average by 28.1%Gas & Power. Operating profit in dollar terms driven by the strong market environment of the first nine months of the year. Average gas realizations were supported by a favorable trading environment and also a better sales mix reflecting higher volumes marketed on the basis of spot prices on the U.S. market. Eni’s liquids realizations for the full year2009 amounted to 84.05 $/BL (up 24.2%) which benefited from narrowing differentials between heavy and light crude recorded in the year and were reducedeuro 3,687 million, a decrease of euro 343 million compared with 2008, down by approximately 4.13 $/BL8.5%. This decrease was principally due to the settlementfollowing factors: (i) lower results from marketing operations in Italy as sales volumes of certain commodity derivatives relatinggas declined by 12.83 BCM, or 24.3%, due to the sale of 46 mmBBL in the year, as follows:

in the first three quarters of the year liquid realizations were reduced on average by 6.02 $/BL from the sale of 34.5 mmBBL; and
in the fourth quarter liquid realizations were increased by 1.36 $/BL from the sale of 11.5 mmBBL. The positive contribution of these derivatives was confirmed in the first quarter 2009.

100


These derivatives were entered into in 2007 to hedge future cash flows in the 2008-2011 period from the commodity risks on the sale of approximately 2% of Eni’s proved reserves as of 2006 year-end (125.7 mmBBL of which 79.7 million remained as of December 31, 2008) associated with certain asset purchases in the Gulf of Mexico and Congo that were executed in 2007.

Liquid realizations and the impact of commodity derivatives were as follows:

Full Year

  

2007

 

2008

  
 
Sales volumes (mmBBL) 366.7 364.3 
Sales volumes hedged by derivatives (cash flow hedge)     46.0 
Total price per barrel, excluding derivatives ($/BL) 67.7 88.17 
Realized gains (losses) on derivatives     (4.1)
Total average price per barrel   67.7 84.05 


Operating profitlower gas demand and competitive pressures, also impacting selling margins. The negative margin/volume performance in 2007 amounted to euro 13,788 million, down euro 1,792 million from 2006, or 11.5%, reflecting: (i)marketing operations was incurred notwithstanding a positive impact associated with the renegotiation of certain long-term supply contracts; (ii) a negative impact due to the appreciation of the euro over the dollar (approximately euro 1,400 million), resultingon gas inventory valuation associated with falling gas prices which resulted in a decreasedecreased carrying amount of gas inventories recorded at the weighted average cost or net realizable value, whichever is lower; and (iii) a provision accounted in revenues partly offset by lower operating expenses when translated into euro; (ii) lower production volumes sold (down 14.7 mmBOE) due to disruptionsthe LNG business associated with poor market perspectives in Nigeria and Venezuela’s expropriation of the Dación oilfield assets; (iii) increased exploration expenses (euro 840 million on a constant basis) in connection with higher geological and geophysical expenses and increased exploratory drilling expenditures that are expensed in full as incurred; and (iv) rising operating costs reflecting the impact of sector-specific inflation and higher amortization and depreciation charges.United States. These negatives were partly offset byby: (i) the circumstance that sales to residential customers in Italy and other customers consuming less than 200,000 CM/y benefited from the regulatory indexation mechanism whereby the selling price was updated with a certain delay to changed market conditions, resulting in higher realizationsmargins on those sales. Management believes that this mechanism will have an opposite effect on the Company’s results in dollars (oil up 12.7%, natural gas up 2.2%).coming quarters; and (ii) positive mark-to-market evaluation of certain commodity derivatives which are recorded against profit as they lack formal requirements to be designated as hedges under applicable accounting standards. The International Transport business recorded a drop in operating profit; while regulated businesses in Italy increased their result.

Gas & Power. Operating profit in 2008 amounted to euro 3,9334,030 million, representing a decrease of euro 194435 million, declineor 9.7% compared to 2007, down 4.7%.2008. This decrease reflected the following trends: (i) lower results from marketing operations in Italy as sales volumes of gas declined by 3.26 BCM due to the impact of lower gas demand and competitive pressures; (ii) gas selling margins were lower as they were affected by a rapid recovery in the U.S. dollar vs. the euro exchange rate in the last part of the year. The Company’sIn fact, the Company cost of gas supplies are linked to the current U.S. dollar vs. the euro exchange rate on a monthly basis, while gas selling prices are indexedreflect a longer time span in the indexation to the U.S. dollar over a longer time period.dollar. As a result of this, in the last part of the year, gas purchase prices were affected by the recovery in the dollar leading to relatively higher purchase costs, while selling prices reflected the stronger euro recorded in the previous months; and (iii) the fact that certain provisions accrued in previous reporting periods were partially reversed recycled

110


through the 2007 profit and loss statement due to favorable developments in Italy’s regulatory framework. Those provisions were originally accrued due to the implementation of Resolution No. 248/2004 and following ones by the Italian Authority for Electricity and Gas regarding the indexation mechanism of the raw material cost in supply contracts to resellers and residential customers. These decreasesnegatives were partly offset by an increase in operating results from regulated businesses in Italy.

Operating profit in 2007 amounted to euro 4,127 million, a euro 325 million increase compared to 2006, up 8.5%, due to: (i) a positive development with Italy’s regulatory framework on gas pricing to residential clients, reflecting a more favorable indexation mechanism of the raw material cost component as established by the Authority for Electricity and Gas with Resolution No. 79/2007, changing the regime in force in the first half of 2006 as established by Resolution No. 248/2004. Additionally, Eni fulfilled obligations provided by this resolution to renegotiate wholesale contracts based on the same indexation mechanism resulting in the partial reversal of provisions accrued in 2005 and in the first half of 2006 with respect to expected charges for these renegotiations; (ii) higher supply costs incurred in 2006 caused by a climatic emergency during the 2005-2006 winter; and (iii) an increase in operating result from transportation activities in Italy.

Refining & Marketing. In 2009, the Refining & Marketing segment reported an operating loss of euro 102 million, which represented a significant improvement (up euro 886 million) compared to 2008 when a loss of euro 988 million was recorded. The improvement reflected the circumstance that an inventory write-down amounting to euro 1,199 million was recorded in 2008 as year-end inventories of oil and products were aligned to net realizable values prevailing on the marketplace at the time of the assessment which coincided with the low of the oil cycle. In 2009, an inventory holding gain amounting to euro 792 million was recognized reflecting the impact of a recovery in prices of crude oil and products on year-end valuation of inventories according to the average-cost method of inventory accounting. When excluding the inventory impacts, the Refining & Marketing segment reported underlying losses mainly due to sharply lower refining margins. Those were affected by an unfavorable trading environment due to weak end-prices of products depressed by poor demand, excess inventory of finished products on the marketplace, in particular diesel oil, whose spread on raw material reached historical lows in the fourth quarter, and excess capacity. As a result, product price did not absorbed the purchase price of oil-based feedstock. Also narrowing price differentials between heavy and light crude qualities negatively affected Eni’s complex throughputs by reducing cost-advantages associated to conversion: (i) lower operating performance delivered by the Marketing activities affected by weak demand in wholesale markets in Italy and retail European markets; and (ii) higher asset impairment charges recorded in the light of the negative outlook for the refining industry and a downsizing of growth expectations on certain markets.

The Refining & Marketing segment in 2008 reported an operating loss of euro 1,023988 million, a euro 1,7521,674 million decrease compared to 2007, mainly due to an inventory holding loss amounting to euro 1,199 million recognized in the 2008 profit and loss reflecting the impact of falling prices of crude oil and products on the year-end valuation of inventories according to the average-cost method of inventory accounting. In addition, impairment losses were recorded amounting to euro 299 million (down euro 241 million from 2007) as the recoverable amounts of certain refining plants and service stations were lower than their carrying amounts due to deteriorating profitability prospectsperspectives on the backdropback of lowered expectations for the future trading environment. In 2007 an inventory holding gain of euro 658 million was recorded in connection with the impact of increasing prices of oil and refined products. Inventory holding gains or losses represent the difference between the costcosts of sales of the volumes sold during the period calculated using the cost of supplies incurred during the same period and the cost of sales calculated using the weighted average cost method.

In 2008, reported operating benefited from aOn the positive underlying performance ofside, the refining business reflectingdelivered a better operating performance on the back of a favorable trading environment partly offset by lower throughputs due to plannedfor Eni’s complex refineries, reflecting increasing discounts on sour crudes, increasing margins from certain of the company’s secondary products (such as base lubricants and unplanned refinery

101


downtime and higher refinery expenses associated with utilities and compliance with certain environmental regulations about carbon dioxide emissions.bitumen). Marketing activities in Italy also reported higher operating results due to a recovery in retail margins that were supported by a number of marketing initiatives and increased sales volumes as a result of an increased market share. The increase in wholesale business was due to higher margins.

Operating profitPetrochemicals. In 2009 the Petrochemical segment reported an operating loss in 2007 amounted tothe amount of euro 729675 million, awhich represented an improvement of euro 410170 million increase compared to 2006,2008 mainly due to: (i) an inventory holding gain amounting to euro 658 million recognized in 2007 profit and loss reflecting the impact of rising prices of crude oil and products on the valuation of year-end inventories using the average-cost method of inventory accounting. In 2006 an inventory holding loss of euro 215 million was recorded in connection with the impact of declining prices of oil and refined products. Inventory holding gains or losses represent the difference between the cost of sales of the volumes sold during the period calculated using the cost of supplies incurred during the same period and the cost of sales calculated using the weighted average cost method; and (ii) a provision accrued in 2006 against a fine imposed by the Italian Antitrust Authority for anti-competitive activities in the field of supplies of jet fuel (euro 109 million).

On the negative side, the refining business delivered a weaker operating performance on the backdrop of an unfavorable trading environment for Eni’s complex refineries, reflecting reduced discounts on sour crudes, lowering margins from any of the company’s secondary products (such as base lubricants and bitumen) as the prices for these products did not increase in proportion to the costs of the feedstock used to produce them and the appreciation of the euro over the dollar. Marketing activities in Italy also reported a lower operating profit mainly due to: (i) lower retail margins; and (ii) a decline in wholesale business result due to lower impairment losses (down euro 157 million from 2008). The segment’s results continued to be affected by weak industry fundamentals due to poor demand, excess capacity and competitive pressures. As a result, the segment reported unprofitable margins on products and volumes marketed (down 1.8%), the latter also reflecting unusually mild winter weather in the first quarter of 2007 causing lower sales of home-heating fuels.volumes (down 8.9%).

Petrochemicals. In 2008 the Petrochemical segment reported an operating loss amounting toin the amount of euro 822845 million, a euro 896945 million decrease compared to 2007, due to:to (i) a steep decline in selling margins of commodity chemicals, reflecting higher supply costs of oil-based feedstock which were not fully transferred to final selling prices; (ii) lower demand on end-markets particularly in the fourth quarter of the year as the economic downturn worsened and (iii) an inventory holding loss (euro 166 million). In addition, impairment losses ofwere recorded amounting to euro 278 million were recorded as the recoverable amounts of certain petrochemicals plants were lower than their carrying amounts due to deteriorating profitability prospectsperspectives on the backdropback of lowered expectations for the future unfavorable trading environment.

Operating profit in 2007 amounted to euro 74 million, a euro 98 million decrease compared to 2006, down 57%, due to lower selling margins of commodity chemicals, particularly the margin on cracker and on aromatic products (paraxilene), reflecting a sharp increase in the cost of oil-based feedstock which was not fully transferred to final selling prices. This negative was partly offset by: (i) higher production and sales volumes compared to 2006; when an accident occurred at the Priolo refinery which heavily impacted performance; and (ii) lower asset impairments (euro 50 million) and risk provisions (euro 31 million). In addition a lower inventory holding gain was recorded (down euro 54 million).

Engineering & Construction. Operating profit in 2009 amounted to euro 881 million, a decrease of euro 164 million, or 15.7% compared to 2008. This decrease related to a non-recurring item represented by a charge amounting to euro 250 million that was the estimated cost of a possible resolution of the investigation related to the TSKJ consortium based on the current status of ongoing discussions with U.S. Authorities (See “Item 18 – Note 28 of the Financial Statements”). Although the charge was recognized in the segment results of the Engineering & Construction business as it related to a project to build gas liquefaction plants, it will be fully incurred by Eni and Saipem’s minorities will be left unaffected due to Eni’s contractual obligations to indemnify Saipem undertaken in connection with the divestiture of Snamprogetti SpA, whose subsidiary Snamprogetti Netherlands BV participates to the TSKJ venture. See “Item 8 Financial Information – Legal Proceedings” for further details. When excluding the

111


impact of the charge, the segment reported an improved operating performance recorded in all business areas reflecting steady revenue growth and stable profitability as a result of the large number of oil & gas projects that were started during the upward phase of the oil cycle.

Operating profit in 2008 amounted to euro 1,045 million, a euro 208 million increase (24.9%) compared to 2007.2007, or 24.9%. This increase related to an improved operating performance recorded in all business areas. In particular, Onshore and Offshore businesses benefited from improved margins, Offshore and Onshore activities reflected higher tariffs and higher activity levels.

Operating profit in 2007 amounted to euro 837 million, a euro 332 million increase (65.7%) compared to 2006. This increase related to an improved operating performance recorded in all business areas, particularly in the Offshore and Onshore construction businesses due to higher activity levels and improved margins.

Other activities. This reporting segment includes the results of operations of Eni’s subsidiary Syndial which runs minor petrochemical activities and reclamation and decommissioning activities pertaining to certain businesses which Eni exited in past years.

Other activities reported an operating loss of euro 382 million for 2009, representing a reduction of euro 36 million, or 10.4%, compared to the loss recorded in 2008 (euro 346 million) mainly due to higher environmental charges (euro 153 million).

Other activities reported an operating loss of euro 346 million for 2008, representing an improvement of euro 98 million, or 22.1%, compared to an operatingthe loss recorded in 2007 (euro 444 million) mainly due to impairment losses, as well as lower environmental charges (euro 109 million).

Other activities reported an operating loss of euro 444 million for 2007, representing an improvement of euro 178 million, or 28.6%, compared to the loss recorded in 2006 (euro 622 million) mainly due to lower provisions for risks and lower asset impairments (for a cumulative positive effect of euro 78 million) and to a gain recognized upon settlement of certain contractual issues with Dow Chemical. This was partly offset by higher environmental charges (euro 84101 million).

Corporate and financial companies. These activities include expenses incurred in connection with corporate activities including the central treasury department and financial subsidiaries that makes availableprovide a range of

102


financial services to the Group,group, including supporting the financing of Eni’s projects around the world, as well as results from operations of certain Eni’s minor subsidiaries that provide a range of services including training, business support, real estate and general purposes services to group’s companies.

The aggregate Corporate and financial companies reported an operating loss of euro 686474 million for 2009, representing a reduction of euro 269 million, compared to the loss recorded in 2008 (euro 743 million), mainly reflecting the circumstance that in 2008 a contribution of euro 200 million to the solidarity fund pursuant to Italian Law Decree No. 112/2008 to be used to subsidize the gas bills for residential uses of less affluent citizens and higher environmental provisions were accounted for.

The aggregate Corporate and financial companies reported an operating loss of euro 743 million for 2008, representing a decline of euro 469431 million, compared to the loss recorded in 2007 (euro 217312 million), mainly reflecting a contribution of euro 200 million to the solidarity fund pursuant to Italian Law Decree No. 112/2008 to be used to subsidize the gas bills for residential uses of less affluent citizens and higher environmental provisions.

The aggregate Corporate and financial companies reported an operating loss of euro 217 million for 2007, representing an improvement of euro 79 million, or 26.7%, compared to the loss recorded in 2006 (euro 296 million), mainly reflecting lower operating costs and lower provisions for redundancy incentives.

 

e) Net Finance Expense

The table below sets forth a breakdown of Eni’s net financial expense for the periods indicated:

 

Year ended December 31,


  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
  

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
 

(euro million)

Gain (loss) on derivative financial instruments 383 26 (551) 155 (427) (4)
Exchange differences, net (152) (51) 206  (51) 206 (106)
Interest income 194 236 87  236 87 33 
Finance expense on short and long-term debt (462) (703) (993) (703) (993) (753)
Finance expense due to passage of time (116) (186) (249) (186) (249) (218)
Income from equity instruments   188 241  188 241 163 
Other finance income (expense), net 198 227 259 
Other finance income and expense, net 227 259 111 
 45 (263) (1,000) (134) (876) (774)
Finance expense capitalized 116 180 236  180 236 223 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 161 (83) (764) 46 (640) (551)
 

 

 

 

 

 

2009 compared to 2008. In 2009 net finance expenses were euro 551 million, a decrease of euro 89 million from 2008. This was mainly due to increased losses on exchange differences (up euro 312 million) offset by gains recognized in connection with fair value evaluation through profit and loss of certain derivative instruments on

112


exchange rates (up euro 423 million) which were recorded against profit as they did not qualify for hedge accounting. In addition, lower finance charges were incurred as interest rates on euro-denominated finance debt (Euribor down 3.4 percentage points) and on dollar loans (Libor down 2.2 percentage points) were down. A gain from an interest amounting to euro 163 million was recorded (euro 241 million in 2008) related to the contractual remuneration of 9.4% on the 20% interest in OAO Gazprom Neft, calculated up to April 24, 2009, when Gazprom paid for the call option exercised on April 7, 2009.

2008 compared to 20072007.. In 2008 net finance expenses were recorded amounting to euro 764640 million increasing byan increase of euro 681686 million from 2007. This was mainly due to a net loss of euro 551427 million (as compared to a net gain of euro 26155 million in 2007) recognized in connection with fair value valuation through profit and loss of certain derivatives instruments on commodities, interest and exchange rates that do not qualify for hedge accounting under IFRS. These transactions do not qualify for hedge accounting under IFRS due to the fact that Eni hedges its exposure to commodity prices and interest and foreign exchange rates based on the overall exposure of the group to commodity prices and foreign exchange and interest rates (rather than on a transaction-by-transaction basis which would be required for hedge accounting).rates. In addition, increased finance charges were incurred as average net borrowings increased, and interest rates on euro-denominated finance debt were up (Euribor up 0.3 percentage points) partially offset by lower interest rates on dollar loans (Libor down 2.4 percentage points). A gain from an equity instrument amounting to euro 241 million was recorded (euro 188 million in 2007) relating to the contractual remuneration of 9.4% on the 20% interest in OAO Gazprom Neft according to the contractual arrangements between Eni and Gazprom.

2007f) Net Income from Investments

2009 compared to 20062008. . In 2007, net finance expense (euro 83 million) increased by euro 244 millionNet income from 2006 when a net finance income of euro 161 millioninvestments in 2009 was recorded. This change was mainly due to:

(i)the recognition of lower gains on the fair value evaluation of certain financial derivatives instruments which do not meet the formal criteria to be assessed as hedges under IFRS, including the ineffective portion of the change in fair value of certain commodity derivatives designed as cash flow hedges resulting in a loss of euro 52 million in connection with trends in oil prices as of the date of the evaluation.
Eni entered into these instruments to hedge the exposure to variability in future cash flows deriving from marketing an amount of Eni’s proved reserves equal to 2% of proved reserves as of December 31, 2006 (corresponding to approximately 125.7 mmBOE). These hedging transactions were undertaken in connection with the acquisitions executed in 2007 of proved and unproved properties in Congo and in the Gulf of Mexico. Eni put in place certain forward sale contracts at a fixed price and call and put options with the same date of exercise. These options can be exercised in presence of crude oil market prices higher or lower compared with preset contractual prices. The effective portion of the change in fair value of these hedges was directly recognized in equity and amounted to a loss of approximately euro 1.3 billion net of the related tax benefit with a corresponding decrease in other current and non-current liabilities; and
(ii)the increase in net finance expenses due to the increase registered in average net borrowings, as well as the impact of higher interest rates on euro (Euribor up 1.2 percentage points) and dollar loans (Libor up 0.1 percentage points).

103


These negatives were partly offset by a net gain of euro 188569 million recognized in connectionand mainly related to: (i) the share of profit of entities accounted for with the fair value valuation recordedequity method (euro 393 million), mainly in the profitGas & Power and loss account of bothExploration & Production divisions. Gains also comprised a 20%gain on Eni’s 60% interest in OAO Gazprom Neft that Eni acquired on April 4, 2007 following finalizationArtic Russia (euro 100 million) due to the divestment of a bid within the Yukos liquidation procedure, and the related call option granted by Eni51% stake in OOO Severenergia to Gazprom related to this interest. This call option is exercisable within 24 months starting from the acquisition date, at a price of $3.7 billion equaling the bid price, as modified by subtracting dividends received and adding possible share capital increases, a contractual remuneration of 9.4%based on the capital employed and additional financing costs. The net gain recognized through the profit and loss equaled the remuneration of the capital employed by Eni in the transaction according to the contractual arrangements between the two partners. This accounting treatment is in accordance with the fair value option provided by IAS 39. Eni elected this accounting treatment to eliminate a recognition inconsistency that would otherwise arise from measuring the 20% interest in OAO Gazprom Neft and the related call option on different bases. In fact, the call option grantedexercised by the Russian company; and (ii) dividends received by entities accounted for at cost (euro 164 million), mainly related to Gazprom is measured at fair value through profit or loss being a derivative instrument. Fair value evaluation of the 20% interest in OAO Gazprom Neft was based on quoted market prices as this entity is currently listed on the London Stock Exchange.Nigeria LNG Ltd.

f) Income (Expenses) from Investments

2008 compared to 20072007.. Net income from investments in 2008 was a net gain of euro 1,373 million and was mainly related to: (i) Eni’s share of profit of entities accounted for with the equity method (euro 640 million), in particular in the Gas & Power and Exploration & Production divisions; (ii) net gains on the divestment of interest in Gaztransport et Technigaz SAS (euro 185 million) in the Engineering & Construction division and of the interest in Agip España by the Refining & Marketing division (euro 15 million); and (iii) dividends received by entities accounted for at cost (euro 510 million), mainly related to Nigeria LNG Ltd.

2007 compared to 2006. Net income from investments in 2007 was euro 1,243 million and was mainly related to: (i) Eni’s share of earning of equity-accounted affiliates (euro 773 million), particularly in the Gas & Power, Refining & Marketing and Engineering & Construction segments; (ii) net gains on the divestment of interests in Haldor Topsøe AS and Camom Group (totaling euro 290 million) in the Engineering & Construction segment; and (iii) dividends received by affiliates accounted for at cost (euro 170 million). The euro 340 million increase in net income from investments from 2006 was due essentially to higher gains on disposals of interests in the Engineering & Construction segment and higher dividends distributed in particular by Nigeria LNG, whose effects were offset in part by lower results of operations of affiliates.

 

g) Income Tax ExpenseTaxes

2009 compared to 2008. In 2009, income taxes amounted to euro 6,756 million, down euro 2,936 million from a year ago, or 30.3%, mainly reflecting reduced income taxes currently payable recorded by subsidiaries in the Exploration & Production division operating outside Italy due to lower taxable profit.

The Group reported consolidated tax rate was higher compared to 2008, from 50.3% to 56% (up 5.7 percentage points). A number of factors explained the increase:

(i)The impact of recently enacted tax regulations that provided a one-percentage point increase in the tax rate applicable to Italian companies in the energy sector and enactment of a supplemental tax rate to be added to the Italian statutory tax rate resulting in higher taxes currently payable, amounting to euro 239 million for the full year;
(ii)The recognition of a non-recurring item which was a non-deductible tax item, represented by a charge amounting to euro 250 million that was the estimated cost of the possible resolution of the investigation related to the TSKJ consortium based on the current status of ongoing discussions with U.S. Authorities. The matter is fully disclosed in the section “Legal Proceedings” in Note 28 to the Consolidated Financial Statements;
(iii)The payment of a balance for prior-year income taxes amounting to $310 million (or euro 230 million) in Libya as new rules came into effect which reassessed revenues for tax purposes;
(iv)A write-down of certain deferred tax assets associated with upstream properties to factor in expected lower profitability (down euro 72 million);
(v)A lower capacity for Italian companies to deduct the cost of goods sold associated with lower gas inventories at year end (down euro 64 million); and
(vi)The circumstance that in 2008 certain tax gains associated with an adjustment to deferred taxation amounting to euro 733 million were recorded as new tax provisions came into effect pertaining to both Italian and foreign subsidiaries.

These higher tax expenses were partly offset by recognition of a positive adjustment to deferred taxation following alignment of the tax base of certain oil and gas properties to their higher carrying amounts by paying a one-off tax, as part of the reorganization of upstream activities in Italy, and lower income taxes currently payable as

113


new rules came into effect providing for the partial deduction of an Italian local tax from taxable income, also applying to previous fiscal years (for a total positive impact of euro 222 million).

In 2010 management expects the Group effective tax-rate to be flat to slightly lower compared to 2009 (see "Item 3 – Risk Factors").

2008 compared to 2007. In 2008, income taxes amounted to euro 9,692 million, up euro 473 million, or 5.1%, mainly reflecting increased income taxes currently payable recorded by subsidiaries in the Exploration & Production segmentdivision operating outside Italy due to higher taxable profit.

The higherincreased taxes currently payable were partly offset by an adjustment to deferred tax relating to:

 a net gain amounting to euro 176 million which was recorded in connection with new tax rules in Italy that changed the tax treatment of inventories. Law Decree No. 112 of June 25, 2008 (Converted in to Law No. 133/2008) requires that from 2008 Italian energy companies state inventories of hydrocarbons at the weighted-average cost for tax purposes as opposed to the previous LIFO valuation and to recognize a one-off tax calculated by applying a special rate of 16% on the difference between the two amounts. This provision triggered utilization of deferred tax liabilities recognized tilluntil 2008 that were accrued by applying the statutory tax rate to the higher carrying amounts of year-end inventories of oil, gas and refined products stated at the weighted-average cost with respect to their tax base (euro 528 million) partly offset by the recognition of a one-off tax amounting to euro 229 million. This one-off tax will be paid in three annual installments of same amount, due from 2009 onwards. Deferred taxation was accrued on hydrocarbons inventories based on the applicable statutory tax rate of 33% as enacted in June 2008 compared with 27.5% of the previous tax regime representing an expense of euro 123 million;
 application of the statutory tax rate of 33% pursuant to Law Decree No. 112/2008 replacing the previously applicable tax rate of 27.5% on certain deferred tax assets of Italian subsidiaries resulting in a gain of euro 94 million;
 application of the Italian Budget Law for 2008 that provided an increase in limits whereby carrying amounts of assets and liabilities of consolidated subsidiaries can be recognized for tax purposes by paying a one-off tax calculated by applying a special rate of 6% resulting in a net positive impact on profit and loss of euro 290 million; and
enactment of a renewed tax framework in Libya regarding oil companies operating in accordance with production sharing schemes. Based on the new provisions, the tax base of the Company’s Libyan oil properties has been reassessed resulting in the partial utilization of previously accrued deferred tax liabilities (euro 173 million).
enactment of a renewed tax framework in Libya regarding oil companies operating in accordance with production sharing schemes. Based on the new provisions, the tax base of the Company’s Libyan oil properties has been reassessed resulting in the partial utilization of previously accrued deferred tax liabilities (euro 173 million).

104


These positives were partly offset by the factcircumstance that in 2007 Eni made use of an option provided in the annual Budget Law whereby the Company aligned the carrying amounts of certain fixed assets to their tax base by paying a one-off tax and recording through therecycling trough profit and loss account excess deferred taxation resulting in a net positive impact of euro 773 million.

In 2009 management expects the Group effective tax-rate to be approximately 52-53%, representing an increase from 2008 as a result of the recently enacted supplemental tax rate for the parent company which provides for a four percentage point additional rate to be applied to profit before income taxes effective from January 1, 2009 (see "Item 3 – Risk Factors"). In addition, the Group does not expect any gains in deferred taxation for amounts comparable to those recorded in 2008. This guidance on tax rate is based on the Group full year assumption of a Brent price of U.S. dollar 43 per barrel in calculating the tax burden associated with the Company’s PSAs (see "Management expectations of operations" below).

2007 compared to 2006. Income taxes were euro 9,219 million, down euro 1,349 million, or 12.8%, mainly reflecting an adjustment to deferred tax assets and liabilities for Italian subsidiaries relating to certain amendments to the Italian tax regime, including a lower statutory tax rate, enacted by the 2008 Budget Law (euro 394 million), as well as deferred tax liabilities recorded in 2006 due to changes in the fiscal regimes of Algeria and the United Kingdom and charges regarding disputes on certain tax matters (totaling euro 347 million).

The adjustment to deferred tax assets and liabilities for Italian subsidiaries were recognized in connection with certain amendments to the Italian tax regime enacted by the 2008 Budget Law. These included a lower statutory tax rate (IRES from 33% to 27.5%, IRAP from 4.25% to 3.9%) effective January 1, 2008, and an option regarding the increase of the tax bases of certain tangible and other assets to their carrying amounts by paying a special tax with a rate lower than the statutory tax rate. The Group tax rate (46%) declined by 5.8 percentage points from 2006 (51.8%) reflecting: (i) a lower share of profit before taxes generated by the Exploration & Production division; (ii) the abovementioned adjustment to deferred tax assets and liabilities for Italian subsidiaries; and (iii) the recognition of certain gains on divestment of certain interests which are subject to lower taxation. These positives were partly offset by a higher tax rate recorded in the upstream division.

 

h) Minority Interest

2009 compared to 2008. Minority interest was euro 950 million, up euro 217 million from 2008, or 29.6%, and concerned primarily Saipem SpA (euro 567 million) and Snam Rete Gas SpA (euro 369 million).

2008 compared to 20072007.. Minority interest was euro 733 million, down euro 65 million from 2007, or 8.1%, and concerned primarily Saipem SpA (euro 407 million) and Snam Rete Gas SpA (euro 254 million).

2007 compared to 2006. Minority interest was euro 798 million, up euro 192 million from 2006, or 31.7%, and concerned primarily Saipem SpA (euro 514 million) and Snam Rete Gas SpA (euro 268 million). This increase in minority interest mainly reflected the improvement in Saipem’s results of operations and the mentioned gain on disposal of equity interest in certain affiliates.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Eni’s cash requirements for working capital, share buybacks,buyback, dividends to shareholders, capital expenditures and acquisitions over 2006, 2007 and 2008the past three years were financed primarily by a combination of funds generated from operations, borrowings and divestments of non-strategic assets. The Group continually monitors the balance between cash flow from operating activities and net expenditures targeting a sound and well-balanced financing structure.

105114


The following table summarizes the Group cash flows and the principal components of Eni’s change in cash and cash equivalent for the periods indicated.

 

Year ended December 31,


  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
  

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
 

(euro million)

Net profit 9,823 10,809 9,558  10,809 9,558 5,316 
Adjustments to reconcile to cash generated from operating profit before changes in working capital:              
- depreciation, depletion and amortization and other non monetary items 5,753 6,346 11,388  6,346 11,388 9,847 
- net gains on disposal of assets (59) (309) (219) (309) (219) (226)
- dividends, interest, income taxes and other changes 10,435 8,850 9,080  8,850 9,080 6,687 
 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash generated from operating profit before changes in working capital 25,952 25,696 29,807 
Net cash generated from operating profit before changes in working capital 25,696 29,807 21,625 
Changes in working capital related to operations (1,024) (1,667) 2,212  (1,667) 2,212 (1,769)
Dividends received, taxes paid, interest (paid) received during the year (7,927) (8,512) (10,218) (8,512) (10,218) (8,720)
 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities 17,001 15,517 21,801  15,517 21,801 11,136 
Capital expenditures (7,833) (10,593) (14,562) (10,593) (14,562) (13,695)
Acquisitions of investments and businesses (95) (9,665) (4,019) (9,665) (4,019) (2,323)
Disposals 328 659 979  659 979 3,595 
Other cash flow related to investing activities 577 (514) (267) (514) 644 101 
Changes in short and long-term finance debt (682) 8,761 980  8,761 980 3,841 
Dividends paid and changes in minority interest and reserves (6,443) (5,836) (6,005) (5,836) (6,005) (2,956)
Effect of changes in consolidation and exchange differences (201) (200) 918  (200) 7 (30)
 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in cash and cash equivalents for the year 2,652 (1,871) (175) (1,871) (175) (331)
 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year 1,333 3,985 2,114  3,985 2,114 1,939 
Cash and cash equivalents at year end 3,985 2,114 1,939  2,114 1,939 1,608 
 

 

 

 

 

 

The table below sets forth the principal components of Eni’s change in net borrowings(1) for the periods indicated.

 

Year ended December 31,


  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
  

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
 

(euro million)

Net cash provided by operating activities 17,001 15,517 21,801 
Net cash provided from operating activities 15,517 21,801 11,136 
Capital expenditures (7,833) (10,593) (14,562) (10,593) (14,562) (13,695)
Acquisitions of investments and businesses (95) (9,665) (4,019) (9,665) (4,019) (2,323)
Disposals 328 659 979  659 979 3,595 
Other cash flow related to capital expenditures, investments and divestments 361 (35) (267) (35) (267) (295)
Net borrowings (1) of acquired companies   (244) (286) (244) (286)   
Net borrowings (1) of divested companies 1   181    181   
Exchange differences on net borrowings and other changes 388 637 129  637 129 (141)
Dividends paid and changes in minority interest and reserves (6,443) (5,836) (6,005) (5,836) (6,005) (2,956)
 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in net borrowings (1) 3,708 (9,560) (2,049) (9,560) (2,049) (4,679)
 

 

 

 

 

 

Net borrowings (1) at the beginning of the year 10,475 6,767 16,327  6,767 16,327 18,376 
Net borrowings (1) at year end 6,767 16,327 18,376  16,327 18,376 23,055 
 

 

 

 

 

 


(1)iNet borrowings is a non-GAAP financial measure. For a discussion of the usefulness of net borrowings and its reconciliation with the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures see "Financial Condition" below.

115


Analysis of Certain Components of Eni’s Change in Net Borrowings:

a) Net Cash Generated from Operating Profit before Changes in Working Capital

Net cash generated from operating profit before changes in working capital totaled euro 21,625 million in 2009 (euro 29,807 million in 2008 (euro 25,696 million in 2007)2008), updown euro 4,1118,182 million from 2007.2008.

106Net profit for 2009 was adjusted to take into account non-monetary charges and gains amounting to euro 9,847 million, which primarily regarded depreciation, depletion and amortization of tangible and intangible assets (euro 8,762 million), non-monetary charges relating to environmental and risk provisions, impairments of property, plant and equipment and investments (euro 1,085 million). Adjustments to net profit also included income taxes (euro 6,756 million) and interest expenses (euro 603 million).


Net profit for 2008 was adjusted to take into account depreciation,amortization, depletion and amortizationdepreciation and other non-monetary items (euro 11,388 million), which primarily regarded depreciation, depletion and amortization of tangible and intangible assets (euro 8,422 million), non-monetary charges relating to environmental and risk provisions, impairments of property, plant and equipment and investments (euro 2,966 million). Adjustments to net profit also included income taxes (euro 9,692 million) and interest expenseexpenses (euro 809 million).

Net profit for 2007 was adjusted to take into account depreciation, depletion and amortization and other non-monetary items (euro 6,346 million), which primarily regarded depreciation, depletion and amortization of tangible and intangible assets (euro 7,029 million), non-monetary charges relating to environmental and risk provisions, impairments of property, plant and equipment and investments (euro 207 million). Adjustments to net profit also included income taxes and interest expense (euro 8,850 million).

 

b) Changes in Working Capital related to Operations

In 2009, changes in working capital absorbed flows amounting to a negative euro 1,769 million as a result of a decreased balance between trade payables and receivables.

In 2008, changes in working capital added positive flows amounting to euro 2,212 million as a result of increased current liabilities and trade payables, as well as additions to the risk provision.payables. These positives were partly offset by cash outflows associated with increased trade receivables.

In 2007, changes in working capital were negative amounting to euro 1,667 million mainly due to: (i) an increase in the carrying amount of inventories in connection with the evaluation of inventories of refined products under the weighted-average cost method of accounting; and (ii) increased trade receivables. These cash outflows were partly offset by increased trade payables.

c) Investing Activities

 

Year ended December 31,


  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
  

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
 

(euro million)

Exploration & Production 5,203 6,625 9,545  6,480 9,281 9,486 
Gas & Power 1,174 1,366 1,794  1,511 2,058 1,686 
Refining & Marketing 645 979 965  979 965 635 
Petrochemicals 99 145 212  145 212 145 
Engineering & Construction 591 1,410 2,027  1,410 2,027 1,630 
Other activities 72 59 52  59 52 44 
Corporate and financial companies 88 108 95  108 95 57 
Impact of unrealized profit in inventory (39) (99) (128) (99) (128) 12 
 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital expenditures 7,833 10,593 14,562  10,593 14,562 13,695 
Acquisitions of investments and businesses 95 9,665 4,019  9,665 4,019 2,323 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 7,928 20,258 18,581  20,258 18,581 16,018 
Disposals (328) (659) (979) (659) (979) (3,595)
 

 

 

 

 

 

NET INVESTMENT 7,600 19,599 17,602  19,599 17,602 12,423 
 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital expenditures totaled euro 14,56213,695 million and euro 10,59314,562 million respectively in 20082009 and in 2007.2008.

In 2008, 84%2009, 86% of capital expenditures related to the Exploration & Production (euro 9,5459,486 million), Gas & Power (euro 1,7941,686 million) and Refining & Marketing (euro 965635 million) segments.

For a discussion of capital expenditures by business segment and a description of year-on-year changes see below "Capital Expenditures by Segment" below..

116


Acquisitions of investments and businesses totaled euro 2,323 million in 2009 and euro 4,019 million in 2008 and euro 9,665 million in 2007.2008. Main acquisitions executed in the year are outlined in "Item 4 – Significant business and portfolio developments for the year".

Disposals amounted to euro 3,595 million in 2009 and euro 979 million in 20082008.

In 2009, disposals primarily related to: (i) the divestment of a 20% interest in Gazprom Neft following exercise of a call option by Gazprom on April 7, 2009 (amounting to euro 3,070 million). The exercise price of the call option was equal to the bid price ($3.7 billion) as adjusted by subtracting dividends distributed and adding the contractual annual remuneration of 9.4% on capital employed and certain financial collateral expenses; (ii) the divestment to Gazprom of a 51% stake in the joint venture OOO SeverEnergia (Eni 60%). Eni’s share of the transaction is worth $940 million of which $230 million were collected as of year end, which corresponded to euro 659155 million in 2007.at the exchange rate on the transaction date. The remaining part of the divestment was collected by March 31, 2010; and (iii) other disposals relating to non strategic oil & gas properties following agreements signed with Suez.

In 2008, disposals primarily related to the Engineering & Construction segment, in connection with the divestment of the 30% stake in GTT (Gaztransport et Technigaz SAS) (euro 300 million) and the sale of Agip España by the Refining & Marketing segment (euro 153 million).

107


In 2007, disposals primarily related to: (i) the Engineering & Construction segment, in connection with the divestment of interests in Haldor Topsøe AS and Camom Group (totaling euro 378 million); (ii) disposal of mineral assets and other minor assets in the Exploration & Production segment (euro 182 million); and (iii) minor assets in the Refining & Marketing segment (euro 53 million).segment.

 

d) Dividends paid and Changes in Minority Interests and Reserves

In 2009, dividends paid and changes in minority interests and reserves (euro 2,956 million) related mainly to the dividend distribution to Eni shareholders for euro 4,166 million (of which euro 2,355 million related to the balance for the fiscal year 2008 and euro 1,811 million as an interim dividend for fiscal year 2009) and the distribution of dividend to minority interest by Snam Rete Gas SpA and Saipem SpA (euro 335 million) and other consolidated subsidiaries (euro 15 million). These outflows were partly offset by the subscription by Snam Rete Gas SpA minorities of their respective share of a capital increase amounting to euro 1,542 million as part of Eni’s reorganization of its regulated businesses in Italy. This transaction is outlined in “Item 4 – Significant business and portfolio developments for the year”.

In 2008, dividends paid and changes in minority interests and reserves (euro 6,005 million) related mainly to the dividend distribution to Eni shareholders for euro 4,910 million (of which euro 2,551 million related to the balance for the fiscal year 2007 and euro 2,359 million as an interim dividend for fiscal year 2008) and the distribution of dividend to minority interest by Snam Rete Gas SpA and Saipem SpA (euro 288 million) and other consolidated subsidiaries (euro 9 million) and the buy-back program (for euro 778 million by Eni SpA and for euro 58 million by Saipem SpA).

In 2007, dividends paid and changes in minority interests and reserves (euro 5,836 million) related mainly to the dividend distribution to Eni shareholders for euro 4,583 million (of which euro 2,384 million related to the balance for the fiscal year 2006 and euro 2,199 million as an interim dividend for fiscal year 2007) and the distribution of dividend to minority interest by Snam Rete Gas SpA and Saipem SpA (euro 282 million) and other consolidated subsidiaries (euro 7 million) and the buy-back program (for euro 680 million by Eni SpA and for euro 358 million by Snam Rete Gas SpA and Saipem SpA).

 

Financial Condition

In assessing its capital structure, Eni uses net borrowings, and leverage (as described below), both of which are "non-GAAP"is a non-GAAP financial measures. Non-GAAP financial measures are measures that either exclude or include amounts that are not excluded or included in the comparable measures calculated and presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, in Eni’s case IFRS issued by the IASB and IFRS issued by the IASB as adopted by the European Union. Eni calculates net borrowings as total finance debt (short-term and long-term debt) derived from its Consolidated Financial Statements prepared in accordance with IFRS less: cash, cash equivalents and certain veryhighly liquid investments not related to operations including, among others, non-operating financing receivables and securities not related to operations. Non-operating financing receivables consist mainly of deposits with banks and other financing institutions and deposits in escrow. Securities not related to operations consist primarily of government bonds and securities from financing institutions. These assets are generally intended to absorb temporary surpluses of cash as part of the Company’s ordinary management of financing activities.

Management believes that net borrowings is a useful measure of Eni’s financial condition as it provides insight about the soundness of Eni’s capital structure and the means wherebyways in which Eni’s operating assets are financed. In addition, management utilizes the ratio of net borrowings to total shareholders’ equity including minority interest (leverage) to assess Eni’s capital structure, to analyze whether the ratio between finance debt and shareholders’ equity is well balanced according to industry standards and to track management’s short-term and medium-term targets. Management constantlycontinuously monitors trends in net borrowings and trends in leverage in order to optimize the use of internally-generated funds vs. funds from third parties. The measure calculated in accordance with IFRS that is most directly comparable to net borrowings is total debt (short-term and long-term debt). The most directly comparable leverage measure, derived from IFRS reported amounts, to leverage is the ratio of total debt to shareholders’ equity (including minority interest). Eni’s presentation and calculation of net borrowings and leverage may not be comparable to that of other companies.

108117


The tables below set forth the calculations of net borrowings and leverage for the periods indicated and their reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP measure.

 

As of December 31,

 
  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
  

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
  

Short-term

 

Long-term

 

Total

 

Short-term

 

Long-term

 

Total

 

Short-term

 

Long-term

 

Total

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

(euro million)

Total debt (short-term and long-term debt) 4,290  7,409  11,699  8,500  11,330  19,830  6,908  13,929  20,837 
Cash and cash equivalents (3,985)    (3,985) (2,114)    (2,114) (1,939)    (1,939)
Securities not related to operations (552)    (552) (174)    (174) (185)    (185)
Non-operating financing receivables (143) (252) (395) (990) (225) (1,215) (337)    (337)
Net borrowings (390) 7,157  6,767  5,222  11,105  16,327  4,447  13,929  18,376 


















Total debt (short-term and long-term debt) 8,500  11,330  19,830  6,908  13,929  20,837  6,736  18,064  24,800 
Cash and cash equivalents (2,114)    (2,114) (1,939)    (1,939) (1,608)    (1,608)
Securities not related to operations (174)    (174) (185)    (185) (64)    (64)
Non-operating financing receivables (990) (225) (1,215) (337)    (337) (73)    (73)
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net borrowings 5,222  11,105  16,327  4,447  13,929  18,376  4,991  18,064  23,055 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31,

 
  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
Shareholders’ equity including minority interest as per Eni’s Consolidated Financial Statements prepared in accordance with IFRS (euro million) 41,199  42,867  48,510 
Ratio of total debt to total shareholders’ equity including minority interest   0.28  0.46  0.43 
Less: ratio of cash, cash equivalents and certain liquid investments not related to operations to total shareholders’ equity including minority interest   (0.12) (0.08) (0.05)
Ratio of net borrowing to total shareholders’ equity including minority interest (leverage)   0.16  0.38  0.38 
    

 

 

  

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
Shareholders’ equity including minority interest as per Eni’s Consolidated Financial Statements prepared in accordance with IFRS (euro million) 42,867  48,510  50,051 
Ratio of total debt to total shareholders’ equity including minority interest   0.46  0.43  0.50 
Less: ratio of cash, cash equivalents and certain liquid investments not related to operations to total shareholders’ equity including minority interest   (0.08) (0.05) (0.04)
Ratio of net borrowing to total shareholders’ equity including minority interest (leverage)   0.38  0.38  0.46 
    

 

 


NetIn 2009, net borrowings
amounted to euro 23,055 million, representing a euro 4,679 million increase from 2008. This increase was mainly due to the large amount of capital expenditures made in the year, the completion of the Distrigas acquisition and dividend payment to shareholders executed in the year. These outflows were only partially funded with cash flows from operations, divestments for the year and capital transactions. Total debt of euro 23,055 million consisted of euro 6,736 million of short-term debt (including the portion of long-term debt due within twelve months equal to euro 3,191 million) and euro 18,064 million of long-term debt.

Total debt included bonds for euro 10,576 million (including accrued interest and discount on issuance). Bonds maturing in the next 18 months amounted to euro 993 million (including accrued interest and discount). Bonds issued in 2009 amounted to euro 5,058 million (including accrued interest and discount). Total debt was denominated in the following currencies: euro (83%), U.S. dollar (13%), pound sterling (3%) and 1% in other currencies.

In 2008, net borrowings amounted to euro 18,376 million, representing a euro 2,049 million increase from 2007. This increase was mainly due to the large amount of capital expenditures and acquisitions executed in the year which was only partially funded with cash flows from operations. Total debt of euro 20,837 million consisted of euro 6,908 million short-term debt (including the portion of long-term debt due within twelve months equal to euro 549 million) and euro 13,929 million of long-term debt.

Total debt included bonds for euro 6,843 million (including accrued interest and discount on issuance). Bonds maturing in the next 18 months amounted to euro 412 million (including accrued interest and discount). Bonds issued in 2008 amounted to euro 1,812 million (including accrued interest and discount). Total debt was denominated in the following currencies: euro (77%), U.S. dollar (11%), pound sterling (10%) and 2% in other currencies.

In 2007, net borrowings amounted to euro 16,327 million, a euro 9,560 million increase over 2006, up 141%, reflecting the large amount of capital expenditures and acquisitions executed in the year which was only partially funded with cash flows from operations. Total debt of euro 19,830 million consisted of euro 8,500 million short-term debt (including the portion of long-term debt due within twelve months equal to euro 737 million) and euro 11,330 million of long-term debt.

Total debt included bonds for euro 5,386 million (including accrued interest and discount on issuance). Bonds maturing in the next 18 months amounted to euro 584 million (including accrued interest and discount). Bonds issued in 2007 amounted to euro 1,118 million (including accrued interest and discount). Total debt was denominated in the following currencies: euro (78%), U.S. dollar (13%), pound sterling (8%) and 2% in other currencies.

Short-term Debt

As of December 31, 2009, short-term debt of euro 6,736 million (including the portion of long-term debt due within twelve months) decreased by euro 172 million over 2008. The weighted average interest rate of Eni’s short-term debt was 0.8% and 4.2% for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

As of December 31, 2009, Eni had undrawn committed and uncommitted borrowing facilities available of euro 2,241 million and euro 9,533 million, respectively (euro 3,313 and euro 7,696 million as of December 31, 2008).

118


These facilities were under interest rates that reflected market conditions. Changes in unutilized facilities were not significant.

As of December 31, 2008, short-term debt of euro 6,908 million (including the portion of long-term debt due within twelve months) decreased by euro 1,592 million over 2007. The weighted average interest rate of Eni’s short-term debt was 4.2% and 4.9% for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

109


As of December 31, 2008, Eni had maintained committed and uncommitted unused borrowing facilities of euro 3,313 million and euro 7,696 million, respectively (euro 5,006 million and euro 6,298 million at December 31, 2007). These facilities were under interest rates that reflected market conditions. Changes in unutilized facilities were not significant.

As of December 31, 2007, short-term debt of euro 8,500 million (including the portion of long-term debt due within twelve months) increased by euro 4,210 million over 2006. The weighted average interest rate of Eni’s short-term debt was 3.9% and 4.9% for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively.

As of December 31, 2007, Eni had maintained committed and uncommitted unused borrowing facilities of euro 5,006 million and euro 6,298 million, respectively (euro 5,896 million and euro 6,523 million at December 31, 2006). These facilities were under interest rates that reflected market conditions. Changes in unutilized facilities were not significant.

Long-term Debt

As of December 31, 2008,2009, long-term debt of euro 13,92918,064 million increased by euro 2,5994,135 million over 2007.2008.

AtEni entered into long-term borrowing facilities with the European Investment Bank which were conditioned to the maintenance of certain performance indicators based on Eni’s consolidated financial statements or the maintenance of a minimum level of rating. According to the agreements, in case the latter condition is impaired, the Company shall provide new guarantees which the European Investment Bank finds to be satisfactory. As of December 31, 20072008 and 2008,2009, the amount of short and long-term debt subject to restrictive covenants was euro 1,4291,323 million and euro 1,3231,508 million, respectively. In case the Company does not comply with the above mentioned covenants management does not expect any significant effects. Furthermore, Saipem SpA entered into certain borrowing facilities forin the amount of euro 75 million (the same amount as of December 31, 2008) with a number of financial institutions subordinated to the maintenance of certain performance indicators based on the consolidated financial statements of Saipem. Eni and Saipem are in compliance with the covenants contained in their respective financing arrangements. Bonds of euro 6,84311,687 million consisted of bonds issued within the Euro Medium Term Notes Program for a total of euro 6,3919,419 million and other bonds for a total of euro 4522,268 million.

As of December 31, 2008, long-term debt of euro 13,929 million increased by euro 2,599 million over 2007.

 

Capital Expenditures by Segment

Exploration & Production. In 2009, capital expenditures of the Exploration & Production segment amounted to euro 9,486 million, representing an increase of euro 205 million, or 2.2%, from 2008 mainly due to the development of oil and gas reserves (euro 7,478 million) directed mainly outside Italy, in particular Kazakhstan, United States, Egypt, Congo and Angola. Development expenditures in Italy concerned the well drilling program and facility upgrading in Val d’Agri as well as sidetrack and infilling activities in mature fields. About 97% of exploration expenditures that amounted to euro 1,228 million were directed outside Italy in particular to the United States, Libya, Egypt, Norway and Angola. In Italy, exploration activities were directed mainly to the offshore of Sicily. Acquisition of proved and unproved property concerned mainly the acquisition from Quicksilver Resources Inc of a 27.5% interest in the Alliance area, in Northern Texas and the extension of Eni’s mineral rights in Egypt, following the agreement signed in May 2009.

In 2008, capital expenditures of the Exploration & Production segment amounted to euro 9,5459,281 million, representing an increase of euro 2,9202,801 million, or 44.1%43.2%, from 20072008 mainly due to the development of oil and gas reserves. Significant expenditures were directed mainly outside Italy, in particular Kazakhstan, Egypt, Angola, Congo and the United States. Development expenditures in Italy concerned a well drilling program and facility upgrading in Val d’Agri as well as sidetrack and infilling activities in mature fields. About 93% of exploration expenditures were directed outside Italy in particular to the United States, Egypt, Nigeria, Angola and Libya. In Italy, exploration activities were directed mainly to the offshore of Sicily. Acquisition of proved and unproved property concerned mainly the extension of Eni’s mineral rights in Libya, following the agreement signed in October 2007 with NOC, the National Oil Corporation (effective from January 1, 2008), and the acquisition of a 34.81% stake in ABO project in Nigeria.

In 2007, capital expenditures of the Exploration & Production segment amounted to euro 6,625 million, representing an increase of euro 1,422 million, or 27.3%, from 2006 due to development of oil and gas reserves. This amount of expenditures was also affected by industry-wide cost trends regarding oilfield services and equipment. Main projects were executed mainly outside Italy, in particular Kazakhstan, Angola, Egypt and Congo. Development expenditures in Italy concerned in particular a well drilling program and facility upgrading in Val d’Agri and sidetrack and infilling interventions in mature fields. Significant expenditures were directed toward exploratory projects. About 94% of these expenditures were also directed outside Italy, in particular the Gulf of Mexico, Egypt, Brazil, Norway and Nigeria. In Italy, exploration activities were directed mainly to the offshore of Sicily. Acquisition of proved and unproved property concerned mainly a 70% interest in the Nikaitchuq oilfield in Alaska, in which Eni reached a 100% ownership.

Gas & Power. In 2009, capital expenditures in the Gas & Power segment totaled euro 1,686 million and related principally to: (i) developing and upgrading the transport network in Italy (euro 1,479 million); (ii) developing and upgrading storage capacity in Italy (euro 282 million); (iii) developing and upgrading the distribution network in Italy (euro 278 million); (iv) completion of construction of combined cycle power plants (euro 73 million), in particular at the Ferrara site; and (v) the upgrading plan of international pipelines (euro 32 million).

In 2008, capital expenditures in the Gas & Power segment totaled euro 1,7942,058 million and related essentially to: (i) developing and upgrading Eni’s transport network in Italy (euro 1,130 million); (ii) the upgrading plan of international pipelines (euro 233 million); (iii) developing and upgrading Eni’s natural gas distribution network in Italy (euro 233 million); and (iv) ongoing construction of combined cycle power plants (euro 107 million), in particular at the Ferrara site.

119


Refining & Marketing.In 2007,2009, capital expenditures in the GasRefining & PowerMarketing segment totaledamounted to euro 1,366635 million and related essentially to:regarded mainly: (i) developingrefining, supply and upgradinglogistics in Italy (euro 436 million), with projects designed to improve the conversion rate and flexibility of refineries, including the construction of an industrial plant employing Eni’s primary transportproprietary EST technology and completion of a new hydrocracker at the Sannazzaro refinery (operating from July) and at the Taranto refinery (start-up scheduled in 2010) as well as expenditures on health, safety and environmental upgrades; (ii) upgrade of the retail network in Italy, wholesale and LPG activities (euro 691 million); (ii) the upgrading plan of international pipelines (euro 253 million); (iii) developing and upgrading Eni’s natural gas distribution network in Italy (euro 195118 million); and (iv) ongoing construction(iii) upgrade of combined cycle power plantsthe retail network and purchase of service stations in the rest of Europe (euro 17554 million), in particular at. Expenditures on health, safety and the Ferrara site.environment amounted to euro 78 million.

Refining & Marketing.In 2008, capital expenditures in the Refining & Marketing segment amounted to euro 965 million and related mainly to:regarded mainly: (i) refining, supply and logistics (euro 630 million) in Italy, with projects designed to improve the conversion rate and flexibility of refineries, in particular ongoing construction of a new

110


hydrocracker at the Sannazzaro refinery, and expenditures on health, safety and environmental upgrades; (ii) upgrade and restructuring of the retail network in Italy (euro 183 million); and (iii) upgrade of the retail network and purchase of service stations in the rest of Europe (euro 115 million). Expenditures on health, safety and the environment amounted to euro 166 million.

Petrochemicals.In 2007,2008, capital expenditures in the Refining & MarketingPetrochemical segment amounted to euro 979145 million (euro 212 million in 2008) and regarded mainly: (i) refining, supply and logisticsmainly plant upgrades (euro 67558 million) in Italy, with projects designed to improve the conversion rate and flexibility of refineries, in particular the start-up of construction of a new hydrocracking unit at the Sannazzaro refinery, and expenditures on health,, extraordinary maintenance (euro 28 million), environmental protection, safety and environment upgrades; (ii) upgradeenvironmental regulation compliance (euro 28 million), upkeeping and restructuring of the retail network in Italyrationalization (euro 17620 million); and (iii) upgrade of the retail network in the rest of Europe (euro 106 million). Expenditures on health, safety and the environment amounted to euro 141 million.

Petrochemicals.In 2008, capital expenditures in the Petrochemical segment amounted to euro 212 million (euro 145 million in 2007) and relatedregarded mainly to extraordinary maintenance (euro 84 million), plant upgrades (euro 51 million), environmental protection, safety and environmental regulation compliance (euro 41 million), upkeeping and rationalization (euro 24 million).

Engineering & Construction.In 2007,2009, capital expenditures in the Petrochemical segment amounted to euro 145 million regarded mainly plant upgrades (euro 47 million), environmental protection, safety and environmental regulation compliance (euro 39 million), extraordinary maintenance (euro 29 million) and upkeeping (euro 28 million).

Engineering & Construction.Construction division (euro 1,630 million) mainly regarded the purchase of the lay barge Acergy Piper renamed Castoro Sette, the construction of a new pipelayer and the ultra-deep water Field Development Ship FDS 2, development of a new fabrication yard in Indonesia an the activities for the conversion of a tanker into an FPSO, as well as the construction of the two semisubmersible rigs Scarabeo 8 and 9, the new ultra deep water drill ship Saipem 12000 and the jack up Perro Negro 6.

In 2008, capital expenditures in the Engineering & Construction division (euro 2,027 million) mainly related toregarded the start upstart-up of the construction of the deepwater field development ship FDS 2 as well as the ongoing construction of the pipelayer, the semisubmersible platforms Scarabeo 8 and 9 and the deepwater drilling ship Saipem 12000. In 2008, the construction of the FPSO vessel Gimboa and of the jack-up Perro Negro 7 has been completed.

In 2007, capital expenditures in the Engineering & Construction segment (euro 1,410 million) mainly related to: (i) ongoing construction of the new semisubmersible platform Scarabeo 8, a new pipelayer and a new deepwater drilling ship Saipem 12000; and (ii) the conversion of two tanker ships into FPSO vessels that will operate in Brazil on the Golfinho 2 field and in Angola.

 

Recent Developments

The table below sets forth certain indicators of the trading environment for the periods indicated:

  

Three months
ended March 31,

One month
ended April 30,

  

  

2008

 

2009

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
 
Average price of Brent dated crude oil in U.S. dollars (1) 96.90 44.40 108.97 50.34
Average price of Brent dated crude oil in euro (2) 64.60 34.10 69.19 38.17
Average EUR/USD exchange rate (3) 1.500 1.302 1.575 1.319
Average European refining margin in U.S. dollars (4) 3.81 5.34 8.34 4.06
EURIBOR - three month euro rate % (3) 4.5 2.0 4.78 1.42
  

2009

 

2010

  
 
Average price of Brent dated crude oil in U.S. dollars (1) 44.40 76.24
Average price of Brent dated crude oil in euro (2) 34.10 55.09
Average EUR/USD exchange rate (3) 1.302 1.384
Average European refining margin in U.S. dollars (4) 5.34 2.40
EURIBOR - three month euro rate % (3) 2.0 0.6
 

 
 

(1)  iPrice per barrel. Source: Platt’s Oilgram.
(2)iPrice per barrel. Source: Eni’s calculations based on Platt’s Oilgram data for Brent prices and the EUR/USD exchange rate reported by the European Central Bank (ECB).
(3)iSource: ECB.
(4)iPrice per barrel. FOB Mediterranean Brent dated crude oil. Source: Eni calculations based on Platt’s Oilgram data.

120


Eni’s Results of Operations for the First Quarter 2009of 2010

Net profitEni reported improved results for the first quarter of 2009 was down 42.7%2010 compared towith the first quarter of 2008. Reported2009. Net profit and operating profit was down 35.8% as a result of lower profit inincreased by 16.7% and 22.2%, respectively driven by higher results reported by the Exploration & Production and Gassegment. The Petrochemicals segment recorded lower operating losses. The Refining & Power segments due to lower oil prices and falling gas demand amidst the current economic downturn.Marketing segment reported lowered results. The Company also reported lower profit from equity-accounted entities. This decrease in net profit was also due to a highereffective tax rate (up 2.7increased by 1.6 percentage points from 45.6% to 48.3%).negatively affecting the Group consolidated results.

Eni’s results were positively influenced by the depreciation (down 13.2%) of the euro vs. the dollar. The trading environment was characterized by lowerhigher oil realizations in the quarter declining by 50.9% in dollar terms, driven by fallingan ongoing recovery in Brent crude prices (down 54.2%(up 71.7% from the first quarter of 2008)2009). Natural gas realizations increased by

111


3.8%decreased due to the time laglags between movements in oil prices and their effecteffects on gas prices. Refining margins were sharply lower due to prolonged weakness in industry fundamentals. Eni’s results were also negatively influenced by the appreciation of the euro versus the dollar (6.3%).

Improved results reported by the Exploration & Production segment were mainly driven by higher oil realization in dollars and higher sales volumes (up 2.1%). Lower expenditures incurred in connection with lower exploration activity offset higher amortization charges taken in connection with development activities due to production ramp-up at fields which were started in 2009. Production expressed in BOE on an available-for-sale base amounted to 1,762 KBOE/d representing an increase of approximately 2% that was driven by continuing production ramp-up in Nigeria, Congo and U.S., and additions from fields which were started-up in 2009. These positive trends were partly offset by a combined negative impact associated with lower entitlements in Company’s PSAs due to higher oil prices, and lower OPEC restrictions. Also production for the quarter was negatively affected by unplanned facility downtimes and mature field declines, particularly in the North Sea.

The Gas & Power segment reported slightly better operating results as an inventory holding loss incurred last year reversed to profit. This positive was partly offset by a negative impact associated with lower sales volumes and reduced marketing margins increased from acaused by increasing competitive pressures mainly on the Italian market. Also margins on gas were negatively affected by unfavorable trends in energy parameters. Eni’s worldwide natural gas sales were 30.5 BCM, down by 5.7% compared with the first quarter of 20082009. The performance was negatively affected by sharply lower volumes supplied to the Italian market (down by 2.34 BCM, or 17.7%) due to favorable trends in energy parameters used in determining purchase and selling prices of natural gas.

Realized refining margins were slightly impacted by the favorable trading environment as measured by movementsstronger competitive pressures in the relative pricespower generation business, industrial customers and wholesalers. Sales outside Italy increased by 2.7% as a result of products compared to the cost of the oil feedstock (the margin on Brent was 5.34 $/BL, up 40.2% from the first quarter of 2008), mainly due to narrowing differentials between lightan organic growth achieved in France, Germany and heavy oil that penalized Eni’s results on complex cycles. Retail marketing margins were lower. Selling margins of commodity chemicals were sharply due to higher costs of oil-based feedstock that were not fully recovered in sales prices.Northern Europe.

At March 31, 20092010 net borrowings declined by 10.1%approximately 8.7% from December 31, 2008,2009 due to cash inflows provided by operating activities, offset in part by financing requirements for capital expenditures.

In the first quarter of 2009, hydrocarbon production decreased by 0.9% compared with the first quarter of 2008 mainly due to OPEC production cuts, unplanned facility downtime in Nigeria and mature field declines (for further detailed information see "Item 4 – Exploration & Production"). These negatives were partially offset by continuing production ramp-up in Angola, Congo, Egypt and Venezuela. Lower oil prices resulted in higher volume entitlements in Eni’s Production Sharing Agreements (PSAs) and similar contractual schemes.

Natural gas sales were up 4.7% as compared to the first quarter of 2008 reflecting contribution from the Distrigas acquisition. This increase was partly offset by significantly lower gas sales on the Italian market due to the economic downturn.

 

Significant Transactions

On April 7, 2009 Gazprom exercisedFebruary 4, 2010, Eni formally presented to the European Commission a set of structural remedies relating certain international gas pipelines. With prior agreement from its call optionpartners, Eni committed to purchasedispose of its interests in the 20% interestGerman TENP, in OAO Gazprom Neft held bythe Swiss Transitgas and in the Austrian TAG gas pipelines. The European Commission intends to submit these remedies to a market test. In case the Commission approves those remedies upon conclusion of the market test, Eni following agreements betweenwill be in the two partners. The 20% interestposition to resolve an inquiry started in Gazprom NeftMay 2006 for alleged infringements of the European antitrust regulations in the gas sector, which involved the main players in European gas market. Eni received a statement of objections from the European Commission which alleged that during the 2000-2005 period Eni was acquired byresponsible for limiting the access of third parties to the gas pipelines TAG, TENP and Transitgas, thus restricting gas availability in Italy. Given the strategic importance of the Austrian TAG pipeline, which transports gas from Russia to Italy, Eni on April 4, 2007 as part ofhas negotiated a bid proceduresolution with the Commission which calls for the assetstransfer of bankrupt Russian company Yukos. The exercise priceits stake to an entity controlled by the Italian State. In case they are implemented, the remedies negotiated with the Commission will not affect Eni’s contractual gas transport rights. Management expects that a possible divestiture will occur as early as at the beginning of 2011 and as such the call option is equal to the bid price (U.S. $3.7 billion) as adjusted by subtracting dividends distributedprofit and adding the contractual yearly remuneration of 9.4% on the capital employed and additional financing expenses. On April 24, 2009 Eni collected from Gazprom the cash considerationloss for the exerciseyear 2010 will report the full-year results of the call option amounting to U.S. $4.2 billion. TermsEni’s share of the call option granted to Gazprom to purchase a 51% interestprofit in the share capital of OOO SeverEnergia, which owns 100% of the three abovementioned Russian companies engaging in gas development, are currently under review by Eni, Enel and Gazprom.

On March 19, 2009, a mandatory tender offer to the minority shareholders of Distrigas was completed. Shareholders representing a 41.61% of the share capital of Distrigas tendered 292,390 shares on Eni’s offer. Publigaz Scrl tendered its entire interest (31.25%). The transaction has been accounted for in Eni financial statements as at March 31, 2009. On April 8, 2009 Eni paid to those shareholders cash consideration amounting to euro 1,991 million. Following the tender offer, Eni owned 98.86% of the share capital of Distrigas. The squeeze-out on the residual 1.14% was completed in early May. Consequently Eni holds all the shares of Distrigas except for one share belonging to the Belgian State with special powers. Distrigas shares have been delisted from Euronext Brussels.entities. For further details on this transactionthe matter see "Item 4“Item 8Significant business and Portfolio Developments"Legal Proceedings”.

On February 12, 2009, Eni’s BoardManagement intends to divest a stake in its fully-consolidated subsidiary GreenStream where the Company currently owns a 75% stake. Following the intended divestment, the Company expects to account for the entity in accordance with the equity-method of Directors approved the divestment of 100% of Italgas SpA and Stoccaggi Gas Italia SpA (Stogit) to Snam Rete Gas (50.03% owned by Eni) for total cash consideration of euro 4,720 million (euro 3,070 million and euro 1,650 million, respectively). The transaction will be financed by Snam Rete Gas through: (i) a rights issue for up to euro 3.5 billion (Eni has already committed to subscribe its share of the rights issue); and (ii) new medium to long-term financing for euro 1.3 billion. The main effects expected on Eni’s consolidated financial statements when the transaction closes will be: (i) a decrease of euro 1.5 billion in net borrowings and a corresponding increase in total equity as a consequence of the pro-quota subscription of the Snam Rete Gas capital increase by the minority shareholders; and (ii) a decrease in Eni’s net profit equal to 45% of the aggregate net profit of Italgas and Stogit, with a corresponding increase in net profit attributable to minority shareholders. From an industrial perspective the transaction, expected to close in July 2009, will create significant synergies in the regulated businesses segment and maximize the value of Italgas and Stogit due to the higher visibility of regulated businesses as a part of Snam Rete Gas. For further details on this transaction see "Item 4 – Significant business and Portfolio Developments".accounting.

By the end of May 2009, based on the approval of the full year dividend proposal made by theThe Company’s Annual General Shareholders Meeting scheduled on April 30, 2009,29, 2010, is due to approve the full year dividend proposal. Eni expects to pay the balance of the dividend for fiscal year 20082009 amounting to euro 0.650.50 per share.share in May. Total cash out is estimated at euro 2.361.81 billion.

112121


Management’s Expectations of Operations

Management expects that the macroeconomicIn what remains an uncertain energy environment, will remain challenging throughout the whole of 2009. Key management assumptions for the main external variables are an averageforecasts a modest improvement in global oil demand and a Brent price of 4376 $/BLBBL in 2010. Gas demand in Europe and Italy is expected to recover gradually from the steep decline suffered in 2009, which mainly impacted the industrial and power generation sectors at a time when new import capacity was coming on line. The Company faces a challenging refining environment, and does not expect any significant recovery in industry fundamentals which will entail prolonged weakness in refinery margins. Against this backdrop, management expectations about the main trends in the Company’s businesses for 2010 and beyond are disclosed below.

Exploration & Production

Production of liquids and natural gas in 2010 is forecast to achieve a level slightly higher than in 2009, when production was 1.716 mmBOE/d, assuming the Company’s scenario for Brent price of 76 $/BBL for the full year 2010, the same level of OPEC restrictions as in the first quarter of 2010 and asset disposals underway. Growth will be driven by continuing field start-ups, mainly in Congo, Norway and marginally the Zubair project in Iraq, and production ramp-up at the Company’s recently started fields, mainly in Nigeria, Angola and the USA. These additions are expected to be partly offset by mature field declines. According to management’s plans, production growth will strengthen in the coming years as the Company is targeting a production level in excess of 2 mmBOE/d by 2013, implying an annual growth rate of more than 2.5% in the 2010-2013 period under management’s assumptions for oil prices at 65 $/BBL flat in the 2011-2013 period. Those oil price assumptions are particularly significant when it comes to assess the Company’s future production performance considering the entitlement mechanism under Eni’s PSAs and similar contractual schemes. For the current year, the Company estimates that production entitlements in its PSAs would decrease on average by approximately 1,000 BBL/d for a $1 increase in oil prices compared to Eni’s assumptions for oil prices at 65 $/BBL. However, this sensitivity analysis only applies to small deviations from the 65 $/BBL scenario and the impact on Eni’s production increases more than proportionally as the deviation increases. This sensitivity analysis relates to the existing Eni portfolio and might vary in the future. Our production forecast also takes into account the rescheduling of certain projects designed to develop additional gas reserves in the light of current uncertainties about gas demand outlook in Europe.
Management expects that a number of factors will drive cost increases in Exploration & Production operations over the future years. Those factors include: (i) the growing complexity of development projects, as a number of planned new developments will be executed offshore or in remote/hostile environment; (ii) the intense investing activity that is required to maintain the production plateau at existing fields and to counteract natural depletion rate; and (iii) steady trends in costs for purchasing upstream goods and services. Due to those trends, operating costs and depreciation and amortization charges might trend higher in future years.
Management plans to offset those negative factors by leveraging on the Company’s exposure to long-life fields where it plans to achieve substantial cost economies due to scale of operations and the growing exposure to operated projects. Project operatorship enables the Company to exercise more tight control over project execution, expenditures and achievement of project milestones and time schedule.

Gas & Power

In 2010, natural gas sales are expected to slightly decrease compared to 2009 and a decline(approximately 104 BCM were achieved in 2009). Increasing competitive pressures, mainly in Italy, should be partly offset by an expected recovery in European gas demand. Other positive trends include a benefit associated with integrating Distrigas operations and optimization of the supply portfolio, including re-negotiation of long-term supply contracts. Management expects 2010 to be the most challenging year in the 2010-2013 plan periods, as a result of: (i) the circumstance that European gas demand is seen in its early stage of recovery; and (ii) the situation of oversupply on both the European and Italian markets which is expected to persist for naturalsome time due to import capacity expansion and large availability of LNG on the marketplace. Spot prices are expected to remain at depressed levels for the next one to two years and below the oil-linked prices provided in long-term contractual formulas which are the prices payable by the Company in its gas long-term supplies. In addition, the indexation mechanism for sale to residential customers in Italy, of which Company’s results benefited in 2009, is expected to reverse its impact in 2010. Based on these market trends and fuels. The Brent assumption has been used bydevelopments, management for planning purposes and does not intendexpect gas market to furnishrecover to 2008 levels until 2013 when demand growth is anticipated to strengthen and LNG availability on the marketplace is expected to be absorbed by growth in energy requirements on Asian markets. In spite of a forecast for what will be the likely Brent market price for the year. In this environment,challenging outlook, management plans to achievedrive volumes growth in the following volumes targets.years subsequent to 2010. Volumes growth is expected to be supported by the impacts associated with recent renegotiations of long-term supply contracts which are expected to add price competitiveness to the company’s portfolio. In addition the

122


 Hydrocarbon production:Company intends to leverage its multiple presence in key European markets, particularly in France, Benelux and Germany (see “Item 4 – Gas & Power”), integration with Distrigas’ operations and development of a direct sales force. Based on those actions, Eni’s worldwide gas sales are projected to reach 118 BCM by 2013, implying an annual growth rate higher than 3% in the Company projects that its oil2010-2013 period.
Management intends to implement a number of marketing actions designed to support the Company’s selling margins on both the European and gas production will grow with respectItalian markets in spite of rising competitive pressures. Specifically, management intends to 2008 (actual production on available-for-sale basis was 1,748 KBOE/d in 2008) when excluding the impact of OPEC cuts to production levels in certainpreserve profitability of the Company’s countries of operations.gas operations in Italy by focusing on the most profitable customer segments. The Company anticipates a partial downward revisionintends to deploy tailored marketing policies to retain and develop its main customers throughout all market segments. These policies include the offer of its growth rate comparedpricing formulae and services that are designed to its initial plans for a 3% growth rate for 2009 due to lower than anticipated gas demand, rescheduling of certain projects in order to capturebest suit the expected downturn in costs and the impact of unplanned facility downtime, particularly in West Africa.
Worldwide natural gas sales: the Company projects that its natural gas sales will increase from 2008 (actual sales volumes in 2008 were 104.23 BCM) reflecting the full contribution of the Distrigas acquisition. In addition,customers’ needs. Also the Company intends to leverage on a numberthe development of the combined offer of gas and electricity (so-called dual offer) to drive sales to both business and residential customers. In the European markets, the Company plans to achieve cost efficiencies by integrating Distrigas’ operations and optimizing logistics. Streamlining business support activities and reducing marketing initiatives to gainand general and administrative costs will also drive margin improvements.
Considering that current imbalances between demand and supply on the European market share in the main European countries of operations aiming at counteracting the effects of lowering gas demand. Sales in Italy are expected to decline sharply fromcontinue for some time, management factored in its planning assumptions the previous year duerisk that the Company may fail to fulfill its contractual obligations associated with the Company’s long-term supply contracts to off-take minimum annual quantities for significant amounts in the next two years. However, in light of the management assumptions for long-term growth in gas demand, those volumes are planned to be off-taken in subsequent years. For more information see the specific risk paragraph in “Item 3 – Risk Factors”. For a discussion of certain risks relating to the economic downturn and competitive pressures.impact of the evolution of Italian regulation of the natural gas sector on Eni’s take-or-pay contracts see “Item 3 – Risk Factors – Natural Gas Market”.
 Regulated businesses in Italy are planned to benefit from the pre-set, regulatory return on new capital expenditures and cost savings from integrating the whole chain of transport, storage and distribution activities.

Refining & Marketing

Refining margins are expected to remain at an unprofitable level in 2010 as weak industry fundamentals are expected to persist in the near future. Specifically, high feedstock costs, weak demand, excess inventory levels and compressed differentials between heavy and light crudes will continue squeezing margins on products. Refining throughputs on Eni’s account: the Company projects that refinery throughputs will increase slightly from 2008account are planned to be in line with 2009 (actual throughputs in 20082009 were 35.8434.55 mmtonnes). Volumes processed at wholly-owned refineries are expected to increase, resulting in a higher capacity utilization rate, due to a reduction in volumes on third party refineries reflecting improved performance atthe Company’s decision to terminate certain plants.processing agreements. Efficiency improvement actions are expected to partly offset an unfavorable trading environment.
 Retail sales of refined products in Italy and the rest of Europe: the Company projects that sales of refined products at its outlets in Italy and Europe will declineare expected to be unchanged from 2008 (12.032009 (12.02 mmtonnes in 2008, excluding the impact of the divestment of2009) reflecting weak demand. New marketing activitiesinitiatives are planned in the Iberian Peninsula that was executed late in 2008) dueorder to weak demand in the main European marketsstrengthen Eni’s leadership on the backdrop of the economic slowdown.Italian retail market and to develop its market share in European markets.

Engineering & Construction

The Engineering & Construction business is expected to see solid results due to a robust order backlog. The segment is expected to leverage its diversified business model articulated across various market sectors combined with a strong competitive position in frontier areas, which are traditionally less exposed to the cyclical nature of this market. The start of operations of new advanced assets in 2010 and 2011 coupled with the size and quality of the backlog and management focus on execution, underpin expectations for a further strengthening of Saipem’s competitive position in the medium-term.

Petrochemicals

Management expects that results in the Petrochemicals segment will continue being negatively affected by sluggish demand, high costs for oil-based feedstock and competitive pressures. However, management believes that there are signs that demand for the main commodities has bottomed-up. Management plans to implement a number of initiatives designed to reduce fixed operating expenses and to realign the industrial set-up of Eni’s petrochemical operations with a view of enhancing areas of competitive advantage.

123


Capital Expenditure plans

Over the next four years, the Company plans to invest euro 48.852.8 billion in its businesses to support continued organic growth; approximately 67%71%, 17%16%, 8%6% and 6%5% of planned capital expenditures willis expected be directed to the Exploration & Production, Gas & Power, Engineering & Construction and Refining & Marketing segments, respectively.

The main planned projects are as follows: (i) development of oil and gas reserves of hydrocarbons mainly in Iraq, Norway, Kazakhstan, Norway, Libya, Italy, Angola,Algeria, Congo, Egypt, NigeriaAngola, and the U.S. and;; (ii) exploration projects to be executed mainly in the U.S., Libya, Italy, Angola, Indonesia, Nigeria, Norway, Egypt, Congo and Egypt;Indonesia; (iii) upgrading of national pipelines for transporting natural gas, as well as upgrading of Italian distribution networks;networks and gas storage capacity; (iv) development of infrastructures to store natural gas marketing activities in order to support seasonal upswings in natural gas demand;Europe; (v) upgrading of the fleet of construction vessels and offshore drilling rigs, as well as logistic centers and other support facilities in the Engineering & Construction segment; (vi) refinery upgrading, mainly targeting an increase in conversion capacity and flexibility of Eni’s main refineries; and (vii) upgrading of Eni’s networks of service stations for marketing petroleum products.

Eni’s capital expenditure program has remained broadly unchanged with respectis expected to increase by approximately euro 4 billion, up 8% compared to the previous industrial plan that was approved in February 2009 when the trading environment was particularly depressed. The main drivers which explain the increase are: (i) planned expenditures for developing new upstream projects, particularly those associated with reserves development in Iraq, Venezuela and certain fields offshore Angola. Management expects that those projects will contribute to production growth beyond the plan horizon; and (ii) the circumstance that the Company is forecasting steady trends in costs for materials and sector specific services which have fallen far less than what management had anticipated due to the fast recovery in international oil prices. Costs for specialized services, equipment and other goods for the following reasons: (i)oil industry have remained substantially unaffected by the global downturn. As a result management believeshas revised the assumptions made in 2009 that it has adopted prudent pricepointed to a reduction in those costs over the medium term. That trend is expected to be partly offset by the positive impact associated with the Company’s assumptions in making investment decisions and theseof a depreciation of the U.S. dollar over the euro compared to exchange rate assumptions remain intact alsomade in the previous plan as upstream investment costs are mainly incurred in U.S. dollars. Also the re-scheduling of certain gas projects due to current economic downturn; and (ii)uncertainties of the global gas market is expected to partly offset increasing trends.

For the year 2010, management estimates that a high numberplans to make capital expenditures of development projectseuro 14 billion which is broadly in line with 2009 (euro 13.69 billion were invested in 2009), of which euro 10.5 billion are planned in the Company’s Exploration & Production business deliver positive returns at currentsegment. Capital projects are mainly planned for developing oil prices. Additionally, the Company capital plans present a high exposure to the regulated activities in the Italianand natural gas sector (14% of the total investment program) which bear preset rates of returnreserves, exploration projects, upgrading construction vessels and are marginally influenced by market conditions. Management also expects that the current economic downturn will cause a reduction in expenditures required to develop reserves, including oilfield service ratesrigs, and purchase costs of materialsupgrading natural gas transport and support equipment, when compared to costs incurred during the upward phase of the oil cycle. In the event of a further deterioration in the macroeconomic environment, the Company believes that its capital plans retain an adequate level of flexibility to enable rescheduling of a number of projects as approximately 50% of the planned capital expenditures are yet to be committed. A capital project becomes committed when it receives the appropriate level of internal sanction and relevant contracts with third parties are awarded.

In making its capital expenditure projections for the next four years, management has assumed that the Company will be able to deliver approximately euro 5 billion of savings on planned expenditures benefiting from the expected reduction in oilfield service and materials costs and other cost control initiatives on ongoing projects. See "Item 3 – Risk Factors".distribution infrastructures.

Management intendsexpects to pursue strict capital discipline when assessing individual capital projects. Management usesassumed a long-term reference oil price of 5765 $/BLBBL from 2013 onwards in real terms that is adjusted to take account of expected inflation. The internal rate of return of each project is compared to the relevant hurdle rate, differentiated by business segment and country of operation. These hurdle rates are calculated by taking into account: (i) the weighted average cost of capital to the Group;Group. In 2009 management assessed that the cost of capital to the Group increased by 0.5 percentage points on average from the previous year as a result of a higher market premium for the equity risk and the country risk. Such increases were partially reduced by decreased nominal interest rates reflected in the cost of borrowings and in rates of risk-free assets; (ii) a country risk premium which reflects the specific level of risk

113


associated with each country of operationoperations in terms of macroeconomic, business and socio-political current conditions and outlook; and (iii) a premium for the business risk.

Liquidity and leverage

In the foreseeable future, management is strongly focused on preserving a solid balance sheet and an adequate level of liquidity taking into account macroeconomic uncertainties and tight financial markets. By this means, management expects to maintain its current credit rating. For planning purposes, management assessedcalculated the Company’s expected cash flows againstassuming a scenario of Brent prices at 4365 $/BLBBL for the year 2009 increasing slightlyyears 2010-2013 to assess the financial compatibility of its capital expenditures programs and dividend policy with internal targets of ratio of total equity to net borrowing. We note that Brent price in the next three years upperiod January 1 to 55March 31, 2010 was 76.24 $/BLBBL and it was 84.41 $/BBL in 2012 and concluded that cash flows from operations would be sufficient to fund planned capital expenditures and dividend payments, while at same timethe period April 1-April 21, 2010.

Management plans for achieving a ratio of net borrowings to total equity "leverage" that(“leverage”) in 2010 in line with 2009, while going forward management regards as consistent with the priority of preserving the Company’s credit rating. Particularly, for the year 2009, management expects a decrease in capital expenditures as comparedintends to 2008 (euro 14.56 billion in 2008). On the basis of the Company’s projections of cash flow at a price of $43 per Brent barrel for the full year, management expects that the Group’s leverage at year-end 2009 will record a slight increase from 2008 year-end (0.38). Nevertheless, management believes that, based upon its understanding of the criteria used for credit ratings,the Group projected leverage at year-end 2009 will be adequateseek to support the Company’s current credit rating. progressively reduce this ratio to below 40%.

For planning purposes, management assumed an average exchange rate of approximately 1.301.36 U.S. dollars per euro in the 2009-20122010-2013 period. Given the sensitivity of Eni’s results of operations to movements in the euro versus the U.S. dollar exchange rate, trends in the currency market represent a factor of risk and uncertainty. See "Item“Item 3 – Risk Factors"Factors”.

124


Dividend policy

In the next four-year period management intends to pursue a progressive dividend policy. Management intends to pay a euro 1.00 a share dividend for 2010, and thereafter growing the dividend in line with OECD inflation. This dividend policy designedis based on management’s planning assumptions for oil prices at 65 $/BBL flat in the 2010-2013 period. If management assumptions on oil prices were to ensure competitive dividend yields to Eni’s shareholders.change, management may rebase the dividend. For fiscal year 2008,2009, subject to approval at the General Shareholders’ Meeting, Eni is paying a dividend per share of euro 1.30,1.00, of which euro 0.650.50 per share was paid in September 20082009 as an interim dividend with the balance of euro 0.650.50 per share expected to be paid late in May 2009.2010. In future years, management expects to continue paying interim dividends for each fiscal year, with the balance for the full year dividend paid in the following year. The euro 1.3 dividend for 2008 represents a yield of 7.6% as measured against the Eni share price recorded in the month of December 2008 on the Italian stock exchange. See "Item 8 – Dividend Policy" for more details on Eni’s dividend policy and the uncertainties and constraints to which it is subject.

Based on management’s assumptions for oil prices in the next four years, management plans to achieve an average production growth rate of 3.5% in the 2009-2012 period. Oil price assumptions are particularly significant when assessing the Company’s future production performance considering the entitlement mechanism under Eni’s PSAs and similar contractual schemes. For the current year, the Company estimates that production entitlements in its PSAs would decrease on average by approximately 1,000 BBL/d for each $1 increase in oil prices compared to Eni’s assumptions for oil prices. This sensitivity analysis relates to the existing Eni portfolio and might vary in the future.

In the next four years, Eni expects its core natural gas business in Italy to face increasing competitive pressure as a result of: (i) the current economic downturn that has significantly impacted management’s growth expectations of the Italian gas market for the year 2009 and possibly beyond as there is limited visibility on time and strength of the recovery; also future growth rates for European gas demand have been subject to downward revisions (see "Item 4 – Gas & Power"); (ii) an expected increase in supplies of natural gas to the Italian market as new import capacity comes on line in connection with already started-up projects and completion of ongoing projects designed to upgrade import infrastructures to Italy. Specifically, the Company expects additional import capacity to supply up to 10 BCM in 2009 as Eni’s upgrades of its main TTPC and TAG pipelines from Algeria and Russia respectively reach full operations. In addition, Eni is completing another leg of expansion at the TAG pipeline and is planning to upgrade its pipeline from Libya. A competitor has commenced commissioning operations at a new LNG terminal in the Adriatic Sea. Overall the Company expects that import capacity will increase by 25 BCM by 2012 of which 90% will be available by 2010; and (iii) the need on the part of Eni to comply with the mandatory ceilings provided for by Italian regulation by selling natural gas volumes available under take-or-pay purchase contracts to certain Italian natural gas importers who resell those volumes on the Italian natural gas market (see "Item 4 – Regulation of the Italian Natural Gas Market" and "Item 3 – Risk Factors"). As a result of these market trends and developments, management expects that competition will increase in the future putting further pressure on selling margins. Eni’s sales volumes in Italy are projected to decline from the 53 BCM level achieved in 2008 to approximately 50 BCM in 2012. Worldwide gas sales are projected to reach 124 BCM by 2012 leveraging on the Company’s expansion in European markets on the backdrop of the expected synergies arising from the integration of Distrigas (see "Item 4 – Gas & Power"). This planned growth will make for reduced growth expectations in the Italian natural gas market.

Management intends to implement a number of marketing actions designed to support the Company’s selling margins in the Italian market in spite of rising competitive pressure. Specifically, management plans to preserve profitability of the Company’s gas operations in Italy by focusing on the most profitable customer segments. Tailored marketing policies will be deployed to retain and develop the main customers throughout all market segments. These policies include the offer of pricing formulas and services that are designed to best satisfy the customers’ needs. Also the Company intends to strengthen its market position in the residential sector by leveraging on the development of the combined offer of gas and electricity (the dual offer). Streamlining business support activities and reducing marketing and general and administrative costs will also drive margin improvements.

114


For a discussion of certain risks relating to the impact of the evolution of Italian regulation of the natural gas sector on Eni’s take-or-pay contracts see "Item 3 – Risk Factors – Liberalization of the Italian Natural Gas Market".

The expectations described above are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions associated with the oil and gas industry, and economic, monetary and political developments in Italy and globally that are difficult to predict. There are a number of factors that could cause actual results and developments to differ materially, including, but not limited to, crude oil and natural gas prices; demand for oil and gas in Italy and other markets; developments in electricity generation; price fluctuations; drilling and production results; refining margins and marketing margins; currency exchange rates; general economic conditions; political and economic policies and climates in countries and regions where Eni operates; regulatory developments; the risk of doing business in developing countries; governmental approvals; global political events and actions, including war, terrorism and sanctions; project delays; material differences from reserves estimates; inability to find and develop reserves; technological development; technical difficulties; market competition; the actions of field partners, including the inability of joint venture partners to fund their share of operating or developments activities; industrial actions by workers; environmental risks, including adverse weather and natural disasters; and other changes to business conditions. Please refer to “Item 3 – Risk Factors”.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Eni has entered into certain off-balance sheet arrangements, including guarantees, commitments and risks, as described in Note 2928 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Eni’s principal financialcontractual obligations, including commitments under take-or-pay or ship-or-pay clauses,contracts in the gas business, are described under "Contractual Obligations" below. See the Glossary for a definition of take-or-pay or ship-or-pay clauses.

Off-balance sheet arrangements comprise those arrangements that may potentially impact Eni’s liquidity, capital resources and results of operations, even though such arrangements are not recorded as liabilities under generally accepted accounting principles. Although off-balance sheet arrangements serve a variety of Eni’s business purposes, Eni is not dependent on these arrangements to maintain its liquidity and capital resources; nor is management aware of any circumstances that are reasonably likely to cause the off-balance sheet arrangements to have a material adverse effect on the company’s financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or capital resources.

Eni has provided various forms of guarantees on behalf of non-consolidatedunconsolidated subsidiaries and affiliated companies, mainly relating to guarantees for loans, lines of credit and performance under contracts. In addition, Eni has provided guarantees on the behalf of consolidated companies, primarily relating to performance under contracts. The aggregate amount of these guarantees is euro 20.6 billion, euro 7.1 billion of which relate to non-consolidated entities. In addition, Eni has commitments and contingencies relating to purchases of assets an other risks for a total of euro 1.9 billion. See "Item 4 – Acquisition of Distrigas". These arrangements are described in Note 2928 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

 

115125


Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes the principal financial obligations which are described in "Item 18 – Financial Statements – Notes 16, 21, 22, 29 and 31".

Amounts in the table refer to expected payments, undiscounted, by period under existing contractual obligations commitments shown an undiscounted basis as of the balance sheet date.commitments.

 

Maturity year

 
 

Total

 

2009

 

2010

 

2011

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014 and thereafter

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Total

 

2010

 

2011

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014

 

2015 and thereafter

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

(euro million)

Total debt 20,837 6,908 3,630 797 2,687 1,981 4,834
     Long-term debt 14,478 549 3,630 797 2,687 1,981 4,834
     Short-term debt 6,359 6,359          
Interest payments on debt 2,893 502 469 412 383 336 791
Noncancelable operating lease obligations (1) 4,287 618 1,025 697 468 395 1,084
Asset retirement obligations (2) 9,469 269 35 61 18 256 8,830
Environmental liabilities 1,988 396 421 284 223 221 443
Purchase obligations (3) 259,973 17,938 13,777 14,326 14,405 14,112 185,415
     Natural gas to be purchased in connection with take-or-pay contracts (4) 248,329 15,694 13,041 13,574 13,610 13,343 179,067
     Natural gas to be transported in connection with ship-or-pay contracts (4) 5,849 539 537 545 549 528 3,151
     Other take-or-pay and ship-or-pay obligations 1,455 139 135 126 111 106 838
     Other purchase obligations (5) 4,340 1,566 64 81 135 135 2,359
Other commitments 180 8 5 5 5 5 152
     of which:              
     - Memorandum of intent relating to Val d’Agri 180 8 5 5 5 5 152
TOTAL 299,627 26,639 19,362 16,582 18,189 17,306 201,549







Total debt 26,979 8,107 1,859 3,793 2,013 2,501 8,706
Long-term finance debt 21,255 3,191 1,342 3,660 1,967 2,487 8,608
Short-term finance debt 3,545 3,545          
Fair value of derivative instruments 2,179 1,371 517 133 46 14 98
Interest on finance debt 3,864 654 570 545 510 426 1,159
Guarantees to banks 377 377          
Noncancelable operating lease obligations (1) 4,255 886 889 561 470 415 1,034
Decommissioning liabilities (2) 11,327 79 55 112 161 1,640 9,280
Environmental liabilities 1,903 293 259 257 214 193 687
Purchase obligations (3) 248,092 14,845 14,151 13,923 14,634 14,651 175,888
Natural gas to be purchased in connection with take-or-pay contracts (4) 237,407 13,986 13,365 13,123 13,827 13,838 169,268
Natural gas to be transported in connection with ship-or-pay contracts (4) 6,413 546 538 545 559 567 3,658
Other take-or-pay and ship-or-pay obligations 1,787 162 154 139 133 131 1,068
Other purchase obligations (5) 2,485 151 94 116 115 115 1,894
Other obligations (6) 186 21 4 3 3 3 152
of which:              
- Memorandum of intent relating to Val d’Agri 186 21 4 3 3 3 152
TOTAL 296,983 25,262 17,787 19,194 18,005 19,829 196,906
  
 
 
 
 
 
 

(1)iOperating leases primarily regarded assets for drilling activities, time charter and long-termlong term rentals of vessels, lands, service stations and office buildings. Such leases did not include renewal options. There are no significant restrictions provided by these operating leases which limit the ability of the Company to pay dividends,dividend, use assets or to take on new borrowings.
(2)iRepresents the estimated future costs for the decommisioningdecommissioning of oil and natural gas production facilities at the end of the producing lives of fields, well-plugging, abandonment and site restoration.
(3)iRepresents any agreement to purchase goods or services that is enforceable and legally binding and that specifies all significant terms.
(4)iSuch arrangements include non-cancelable,non-cancellable, long-term contractual obligations to secure access to supply and transport of natural gas, which include take-or-pay clauses whereby the Company obligations consist of off-taking minimum quantities of product or service or paying the corresponding cash amount that entitles the Company to off-take the product in future years. Future obligations in connection with these contracts were calculated by applying the forecasted prices of energy or services included in the four-year business plan approved by the Company’s Board of Directors and on the basis of the long-term market scenarios used by Eni for planning purposes to minimum take and minimum ship quantities. See "Item 4 – Gas & Power – Natural Gas Purchases" and "Item 3 – Risk Factors – Liberalization of the Italian Natural Gas Market" for a discussion of nature and importance of Eni’s take-or-pay contracts and the related risks from the evolving regulatory environment that could negatively impact Eni’s results.
(5)iMainly refers to arrangements to purchase capacity entitlements at certain re-gasification facilities in the U.S.
(6)In addition to these amounts, Eni has certain obligations that are not contractually fixed as to timing and amount, including contributions to defined benefit pension plans (see Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

The table below summarizes Eni’s capital expenditure commitments for property, plant and equipment and capital projects atas of December 31, December 2008.2009. Capital expenditures are considered to be committed when the project has received the appropriate level of internal management approval. Such costs are included in the amounts shown.

 

Total

 

2009

 

2010

 

2011

 

2012

 

2013 and subsequent years

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Total

 

2010

 

2011

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014 and thereafter

 
 
 
 
 
 
 (euro million)
Capital expenditure commitments           
     Committed on major projects23,159 4,938 3,831 2,697 1,837 9,856
     Other committed projects24,910 5,147 4,342 3,186 2,389 9,846
 
 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL48,069 10,085 8,173 5,883 4,226 19,702
 
 
 
 
 
 
Committed on major projects 24,026 4,119 3,793 2,829 1,928 11,357
Other committed projects 29,210 9,330 5,284 3,467 3,640 7,489
  
 
 
 
 
 
TOTAL 53,236 13,449 9,077 6,296 5,568 18,846
  
 
 
 
 
 

 

Liquidity Risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that suitable sources of funding for the Group may not be available, or the Group is unable to sell its assets on the market place as to be unableresulting in the Group’s inability to meet short-term finance

126


requirements and to settle obligations. Such a situation would negatively impact the Group results as it would result in the Company incurring higher borrowing expenses to meet its obligations or under the worst of conditions the inability of the Company to continue as a going concern. As part of its financial planning process, Eni manages the liquidity risk by targeting

116


such a capital structure as to allow the Company to maintain a level of liquidity adequate to the Group’s needs optimizing the opportunity cost of maintaining liquidity reserves also achieving an efficient balance in terms of maturity and composition of finance debt. The Group capital structure is set according to the Company’s industrial targets and within the limits established by the Company’s Board of Directors who are responsible for prescribing the maximum ratio of debt to total equity and minimum ratio of medium and long-term debt to total debt as well as fixed rate medium and long-term debt to total medium and long-term debt. In spite of the difficult and ongoing credit market conditions resulting in higher spreads to borrowers, the Company has succeeded in maintaining access to a wide range of funding at competitive rates through the capital markets and banks. The actions implemented as part of Eni’s financial planning have enabled the Group to maintain access to the credit market particularly via the issue of commercial paper also targeting to increase the flexibility of funding facilities. The above mentioned actions aimed at ensuring availability of suitable sources of funding to fulfill short-term commitments and due obligations also preserving the necessary financial flexibility to support the Group’s development plans. In doing so, the Group has pursued an efficient balance of finance debt in terms of maturity and composition leveraging on the structure of its lines of credit particularly the committed ones.

At present, the Group believes it has access to sufficient funding and has also both committed and uncommitted borrowing facilities to meet currently foreseeable borrowing requirements. For a description of how the Company manages the liquidity risk see Note 28 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

As of December 31, 2008,2009, Eni maintained short-termshort term committed and uncommitted unused borrowing facilities of euro 11,00911,774 million, of which euro 3,3132,241 million were committed, and long-termlong term committed unused borrowing facilities of euro 1,8502,850 million. These facilities were under interest rates that reflected market conditions. Fees charged for unused facilities were not significant.

Eni has in place a program for the issuance of Euro Medium Term Notes up to euro 1015 billion, of which euro 6,3919,211 million were drawn as of the balance sheet date.December 31, 2009.

The Group has debt ratings of AA- and A-1+ respectively for the long and short-term debt assigned by Standard & Poor’s and Aa2 and P-1 assigned by Moody’s; theMoody’s respectively for long and short-term debt. The outlook is stable for both. negative in both ratings.

A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities. A security rating may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating organization. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating.

 

Working Capital

Management believes that, taking into account unutilized credit facilities, Eni’s credit rating and access to capital markets, Eni has sufficient working capital for its foreseeable requirements.

Credit Risk

Credit risk is the potential exposure of the Group to losses in case counterparties fail to perform or pay amounts due. TheCredit risks arise from both commercial partners and financial ones. Although the Group manages credit risk differently depending on whether it arises from exposure to financial counterparties or to customers relating to outstanding receivables. Individual business units are responsible for managing credit risk arisinghas not experienced in the normal course of the business. The Group has established formal credit systems and processes to ensure that before trading with a new counterpart can start,past material non-performance from its creditworthiness is assessed. Also credit litigation and receivable collection activities are assessed. The monitoring activity of credit risk exposure is performed at the Group level according to certain guidelines and measurement techniques that establish counterparty limits and systems to monitor exposure against limits and report regularly on those exposures. Specifically, credit risk exposure to multi-business clients and exposures higher than the limit set at euro 4 million are closely monitored. Monitoring activities do not include retail clients and public administrations. The assessment methodology assigns a score to individual clients based on publicly available financial data and capital, profitability and liquidity ratios. Based on these scores, counterparties, are assigned an internal credit rating and classified based on their risk category. The Group risk categories are comparable to those prepared by external credit rating agencies. The Group’s internal ratings are also benchmarked against ratings prepared by such agencies. With regard to risk arising from financial counterparties, Eni has established guidelines prior to entering into cash management and derivative contracts to assess the counterparty’s financial soundness and rating in view of optimizing the risk profile of financial activities while pursuing operational targets. Maximum limits of risk exposure are set in terms of maximum amounts of credit exposures for categories of counterparties as defined by the Company’s Board of Directors taking into account the credit ratings provided by credit rating agencies. Credit risk arising from financial counterparties is managed by the Group central finance departments, including Eni’s subsidiary Eni Trading & Shipping which specifically engages in commodity derivatives transactions.

Those are the sole Group entities entitled to be party to a financial transactions due to the Group centralized finance model. Eligibleseverity of the current economic and financial counterparties are closely monitoredcrisis it is possible that we may experience a higher than normal level of counterparty failure. In our consolidated financial statements for the year 2008, we accrued an allowance against doubtful accounts amounting to check exposures against limits assignedeuro 251 million more than doubling the allowance made a year earlier. In 2009 consolidated financial statements we made a further allowance for doubtful accounts amounting to each counterparty on a daily basis. Exceptional market conditions have forcedeuro 260 million, mainly relating to the Group to adopt contingency plans and under certain circumstances to suspend eligibility to be a Group financial counterparty.

117


Actions implemented also have been intended to limit incentrations of credit risk by maximizing counterparty diversification and turnover. Counterparties have been also selected on a more stringent criteria particularly in transactions on derivatives instruments and with maturity longer than a three-month period. Eni has not experienced material non-performance by any counterparty. As of December 31, 2007 and 2008, Eni had no significant concentrations of credit risk.Gas & Power business.

 

Market Risk

In the normal course of its operations, Eni is exposed to market risks deriving from fluctuations in commodity prices and changes in the euro vs. other currencies exchange rates, particularly the U.S. dollar, and in interest rates. For an in-depth analysis of market risks exposure and policies used by Eni to manage its exposure to market risk see "Item 11 - Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk".

 

Research and Development

For a description of Eni’s research and development operations in 2008,2009, see "Item 4 – Research and Development".

 

 

127


Item 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

Directors and Senior Management

The following lists the Company’s Board of Directors as at April 2010:

Name Position 

Year elected or appointed

 

Age


 
 
 
Roberto Poli Chairman 

2002

 

72

Paolo Scaroni CEO 

2005

 

64

Alberto Clô Director 

1999

 

63

Paolo Andrea Colombo Director 

2008

 

50

Paolo Marchioni Director 

2008

 

41

Marco Reboa Director 

2005

 

55

Mario Resca Director 

2002

 

65

Pierluigi Scibetta Director 

2005

 

51

Francesco Taranto Director 

2008

 

70


 
 
 

In accordance with Article 17.3 of Eni’s By-laws,By-Laws, the Board of Directors is made up of 3 to 9 members. The current Board of Directors currently in office was elected by the ordinary shareholders’ meetingShareholders’ Meeting held on June 10, 2008, thatwhich also established the number of Directors at nine for a term of three financial year term. The Board will therefore expire at the date of the Shareholders’ Meeting approving Eni’s financial statements for year ended December 31, 2010.
The table below sets forth the names of the Board of Directors members appointed, their positions, the year when each was initially appointed as a Director and their agesyears.

Name Position 

Year first appointed to Board of Directors

 

Age


 
 
 
Roberto Poli Chairman 

2002

 

71

Paolo Scaroni CEO 

2005

 

63

Alberto Clô Director 

1999

 

62

Paolo Andrea Colombo Director 

2008

 

49

Paolo Marchioni Director 

2008

 

40

Marco Reboa Director 

2005

 

54

Mario Resca Director 

2002

 

64

Pierluigi Scibetta Director 

2005

 

50

Francesco Taranto Director 

2008

 

69


 
 
 

Roberto Poli, Paolo Scaroni, Paolo Andrea Colombo, Paolo Marchioni, Mario Resca and Pierluigi Scibetta were candidates included in the list of the Ministry for Economyof the economy and Finance.finance. Alberto Clô, Marco Reboa and Francesco Taranto were candidates included inelected on the basis of the list presentedsubmitted by the institutional investors.

While it remains a significant shareholder, the Ministry of Economy and Finance intends to continue to participate in the nomination and election of Eni’s Board of Directors in order to protect its investment as a shareholder.

On the basis of Italian laws regulating the special powers of the State (see "Item 10 – Limitations on VotingStock ownership limitation and Shareholdings"voting rights restrictions"), the Minister of Economyeconomy and Financefinance, in agreement with the Minister of Economic Developmenteconomic development, may appoint another member of the Board of Directors, without voting rights, in addition to those appointed by the Shareholders’ Meeting. On the occasion of the last Board appointment, the Minister for Economyof economy and Financefinance opted not to exercise that power.

Moreover, according to Italian lawRoberto Poli Born in 1938. Chairman of Eni SpA since May 2002. Holds the post of Chairman of Poli e Associati SpA, a consultancy company in the fields of corporate finance, extraordinary operations, company acquisitions and jurisprudence,restructuring plans. He is a Director of Mondadori SpA, Fininvest SpA, Coesia SpA, Maire Tecnimont SpA and Perennius Capital Partners SGR SpA. Between 1966 and 1998, he lectured in corporate finance at Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, in Milan. He has worked as extraordinary operations advisor for some of Italy’s largest industrial groups. He was Chairman of Rizzoli-Corriere della Sera SpA and Publitalia SpA.

Paolo Scaroni Born in 1946. Chief Executive Officer of Eni SpA since June 2005. Graduated in Economics and Business in 1969 at Bocconi University, Milan. He had initial work experience at Chevron for three years, gained a Master’s Degree in Business Administration from Columbia University, New York, and continued his career at McKinsey. In 1973, he joined the Saint Gobain Group, where he performed numerous managerial tasks in Italy and overseas until he was appointed President of the MinistryGlass Division in Paris in 1984. Between 1985 and 1996, he was Vice President and CEO of EconomyTechint and Finance remains a relevant shareholder, Eni’s accounts will be subjectmanaged the privatizations of the subsidiaries SIV, Italimpianti and Dalmine. In 1996, he moved to the reviewUK and joined Pilkington, working as CEO until May 2002. Between May 2002 and May 2005, he was CEO and General Manager of Enel. Between 2005 and July 2006 he was Chairman of Alliance Unichem (UK). In November 2007, he was honored by France as an Officer of the Italian CourtLegion of Accountants ("Corte dei Conti") in order to protect the financial interestHonour. Currently he is Director of Assicurazioni Generali SpA, LSEG Plc (London Stock Exchange Group), Veolia Environnement (Paris), Board of Overseers of Columbia Business School, New York, and Director of the State. A Magistrate appointed byTeatro alla Scala Foundation.

Alberto Clô Born in 1947. Director of Eni SpA since June 1999. Graduated in Political Sciences at the CourtUniversity of Accounts consequently attends Eni’s BoardBologna. Lecturer in Industrial Economics and Public Service Economics at the University of Directors, BoardBologna. In 1980, he founded the journal "Energia", of Statutory Auditorswhich he is editor. Author of books and Internal Control Committee meetings (without any voting right)over 100 essays and Articles on the problems of the industrial economy and energy. Contributor to various daily newspapers and financial journals. Between 1995 and 1996 he was Minister of Industry and ad interim Minister of Foreign Trade and President of the Council of Industry and Energy Ministers of the European Union during the six-month Italian presidency. In 1996, he received the honor of "Cavaliere di Gran Croce" of the Republic of Italy. Currently he is Director of Atlantia SpA, Italcementi SpA and De Longhi SpA.

Paolo Andrea Colombo Born in 1960. Director of Eni hasSpA since June 2008. Graduated in Business Administration in 1984 at the obligation to send toBocconi University, Milan. Qualified as a professional accountant in 1985 and Auditor. Lecturer in the CourtAccounting Department of Accountants its financialthe Bocconi University, Milan. Founding partner of Borghesi

118128


statements together withColombo & Associati, a specialized consultancy firm on corporate finance operations – including taxation and business consultancy in the reportscontext of extraordinary operations – as well as strategic and corporate governance consultancy. Between May 2002 and May 2005, he worked as Effective Statutory Auditor of Eni SpA. Between May 2005 and May 2008, he was Chairman of the Board of Directors,Statutory Auditors. Currently he is Director of Mediaset SpA, Ceresio SIM SpA and Versace SpA, Chairman of the Board of Statutory Auditors of Aviva Vita SpA and its external auditors. The Magistrate delegatedInterbanca SpA, Statutory Auditor of Sirti SpA, A. Moratti Sapa, Humanitas Mirasole SpA, Credit Agricole Assicurazioni Italia SpA and Iniziativa Gestione Investimenti SGR SpA.

Paolo Marchioni Born in 1969. Director of Eni SpA since June 2008. Lawyer specialized in criminal and administrative law, counsel for defense in the Italian Supreme Court and superior jurisdictions. Advisor of public organizations, and commercial companies in matters of commercial, corporate, administrative and local government law. Mayor of the town of Baveno (VB) between April 1995 and June 2004. President of the Assembly of Mayors of Con.Ser.Vco between September 1995 and June 1999 and member of the Assembly of Mayors of ASL14, the management committee of the Verbano Health District, the Assembly of Mayors of the Waste Water Consortium of the Val d’Ossola and the Assembly of Mayors of the Social Services Consortium of Verbano until June 2004. Councilor of the Municipality of Stresa (VB) between April 2005 and January 2008. Between October 2001 and April 2004, he was a Director of C.i.m. SpA, Novara (Goods Interport Centre) and, between December 2002 and December 2005, Director and member of the Executive Committee of Finpiemonte SpA. Between June 2005 and June 2008 he was a Director of Consip. Since June 2009, he has been Vice-President of the Province of Verbano-Cusio-Ossola and provincial councillor responsible for budgeting, property, legal affairs and production activities.

Marco Reboa Born in 1955. Director of Eni SpA since May 2005. Graduated in Business Administration at the Bocconi University, Milan. Professional Accountant and Auditor. Professor at the Faculty of Law of the Carlo Cattaneo University – LIUC – Castellanza, and author of numerous publications regarding corporate governance, economic assessment and budgeting. Works in Milan and is editor of the Rivista dei Dottori Commercialisti, an accountancy journal. Currently he is Director of Luxottica Group SpA and Interpump Group SpA. Chairman of the Board of Statutory Auditors of Mediobanca SpA, Auditor of Gruppo Lactalis Italia SpA, Egidio Galbani SpA and Big Srl.

Mario Resca Born in 1945. Director of Eni SpA since May 2002. Graduated in Economics and Business at the Bocconi University, Milan. Hired after graduating by Chase Manhattan Bank, in 1974 he was appointed Manager of Saifi Finanziaria (Fiat Group) and between 1976 and 1991 he was a partner in Egon Zehnder. During this period he served as a Director of Lancôme Italia, companies in the RCS Corriere della Sera Group and the Versace Group. Between 1995 and 2007, he was Chairman and CEO of McDonald’s Italia. He has also been Chairman of Sambonet SpA, Kenwood Italia SpA, founding partner of Eric Salmon & Partners and President of the American Chamber of Commerce. In June 2002, he received the honor of Cavaliere del Lavoro. In 2008, he was appointed by the government as General Director for the enhancement of Italian museums within the Italian Ministry for Cultural Heritage and Activities. Currently he is Chairman of Confimprese and Finbieticola Casei Gerola SpA, and Director of Mondadori SpA.

Pierluigi Scibetta Born in 1959. Director of Eni SpA since May 2005. Graduated in Economics and Business at La Sapienza University, Rome. Professional Accountant and Auditor, he has practiced at his own studio in Rome since 1990. He was Director of Gestore del Mercato Elettrico (GME) SpA, Istituto Superiore per la Previdenza e la sicurezza del lavoro (I.S.P.E.S.L.), Nucleco SpA, FN SpA and Agenzia per l’innovazione tecnologica (AGITEC) SpA, as well as a former Deputy Extraordinary Commissioner and Director of Ente per le Nuove Tecnologie, l’Energia e l’Ambiente (ENEA) and Effective Statutory Auditor of Consorzio smantellamento impianti del ciclo del combustibile nucleare.

Francesco Taranto Born in 1940. Director of Eni SpA since June 2008. Began his career in Milan, in 1959, at the offices of an exchange broker, subsequently working for Banco di Napoli between 1965 and 1982, where he held the post of deputy manager for the stock exchange and securities department. He has held numerous management posts in the asset management field, particularly as Director of securities funds at Eurogest, between 1982 and 1984, and General Director of Interbancaria Gestioni between 1984 and 1987. After moving to controlthe Prime Group (1987-2000) he held the post of CEO of the parent company for many years. He is currently Lucio Todaro Marescotti (alternate Amedeo Federici).also a member of the steering council of Assogestioni and of the corporate governance committee for listed companies set up by Borsa Italiana. He was a Director of Enel between October 2000 and June 2008. Currently he is Director of Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze SpA, Pioneer Global Asset Management SpA (Gruppo Unicredito) and Kedrios SpA.

Senior Management

The table below sets forth the composition of Eni’s senior management, includingSenior Management. It includes the CEO, who is alsoas General Manager of the Eni SpA, the Chief Operating Officers, of Eni’s three divisions,the Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Corporate Operations Officer and those senior managersthe Executives who attended on a permanent basis the meetings of Eni’s Management Committee and other senior managers whodirectly report to the CEO. This table indicates their positions within Eni,CEO (Senior Executive Vice Presidents of the year they were appointed to such positions, their total yearsCompany).

129


Name Management position 

Year first appointed
to current
position

 

Total number
of year of service at Eni

 

Age


 
 
 
 
Paolo Scaroni Chief Operating Officer of Eni 

2005

 

5

 

64

         
Claudio Descalzi Exploration & Production Chief Operating Officer 

2008

 

29

 

55

         
Domenico Dispenza Gas & Power Chief Operating Officer 

2005

 

36

 

64

         
Angelo Caridi (*) Refining & Marketing Chief Operating Officer 

2007

 

40

 

63

         
Alessandro Bernini Chief Financial Officer 

2008

 

14

 

50

         
Salvatore Sardo Chief Corporate Operations Officer 

2005

 

5

 

58

         
Massimo Mantovani General Counsel Legal Affairs
Senior Executive Vice President
 

2006

 

17

 

47

         
Rita Marino Internal Audit Senior Executive Vice President 

2008

 

5

 

46

         
Leonardo Maugeri (*) Strategies and Development
Senior Executive Vice President
 

2000

 

15

 

45

         
Stefano Lucchini Public Affairs and Communication
Senior Executive Vice President
 

2005

 

5

 

48

         
Roberto Ulissi Company Secretary
Corporate Affairs and Governance
Senior Executive Vice President
 

2006

 

4

 

48

         
Raffaella Leone Executive Assistant to the CEO 

2005

 

5

 

48


 
 
 
 

(*)Until March 2010.

The Chief Operating Officers, the Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Corporate Operations Officer and the Senior Executive Vice Presidents are permanent members of service at Enithe Management Committee, which advises and their ages.supports the CEO. Chief Operating Officers are appointed by the Board of Directors, upon proposal of the CEO in agreement with the Chairman. Other members of Eni’s senior management are appointed by Eni’s CEO and may be removed without cause.

Name Management position 

Year first appointed
to current
position

 

Total number
of year of service at Eni

 

Age


 
 
 
 
Paolo Scaroni Chief Operating Officer of Eni 

2005

 

4

 

63

         
Claudio Descalzi (*) Chief Operating Officer for the Exploration & Production Division 

2008

 

28

 

54

         
Domenico Dispenza Chief Operating Officer for the Gas & Power Division 

2005

 

35

 

63

         
Angelo Caridi Chief Operating Officer for the Refining & Marketing Division 

2007

 

39

 

62

         
Alessandro Bernini (**) Chief Financial Officer 

2008

 

13

 

49

         
Salvatore Sardo Chief Corporate Operations Officer 

2005

 

4

 

57

         
Massimo Mantovani The Group Senior Executive Vice President
for Legal Affairs
 

2006

 

16

 

46

         
Rita Marino The Group Senior Executive Vice President
for Internal Audit
 

2008

 

4

 

45

         
Leonardo Maugeri The Group Senior Executive Vice President
for Strategies and Development
 

2000

 

14

 

44

         
Stefano Lucchini The Group Senior Executive Vice President
for Public Affairs and Communication
 

2005

 

4

 

47

         
Roberto Ulissi The Group Senior Executive Vice President
for Corporate Affairs and Governance
 

2006

 

3

 

47

         
Raffaella Leone Executive Assistant to the Chief Executive Officer 

2005

 

4

 

47


 
 
 
 

(*)iAppointed by the Board of Directors on July 30, 2008.
(**)iAppointed on August 1, 2008.

The biographies of Eni’s directors and senior managers are set out below.

Roberto Poli was appointed Chairman of Eni SpA in May 2002. He is currently President of Poli e Associati SpA, a consulting firm specialized in corporate finance, mergers, acquisitions and reorganizations. From 1966 to 1998 he was Professor of Business Finance atcause, except for the Università Cattolica of Milan. He is a partner of a leading firm for corporate finance and legal affairs. He is director in important companies such as Fininvest SpA, Mondadori SpA, Merloni Termosanitari SpA, Coesia SpA, Maire Technimont SpA and Perennius Capital Partners SGR SpA. He has been an advisor for extraordinary finance operations for some of the most important companies in Italy. He has also been Chairman of Rizzoli-Corriere della Sera SpA and Publitalia SpA.

Paolo Scaroni was appointed CEO of Eni SpA in June 2005. He obtained an economics degree from Milan’s Bocconi University in 1969 and an MBA from Columbia Business School in 1973. For a year following business school, he was an associate at McKinsey & Co. From 1973 until 1985, he held a series of positions with Saint Gobain, culminating with his appointment as President of the Saint Gobain flat glass division. From 1985 to 1996 he was Deputy Chairman and CEO of Techint. During his time at Techint, he was alsoSenior Executive Vice President of FalckInternal Audit Department and executive Vice President of SIV, a joint venture between Techint and Pilkington plc. He joined Pilkington in 1996 and was group CEO until May 2002. From May 2002 to May 2005 he was CEO of Enel, Italy’s leading electricity utility. Paolo Scaroni is a member ofthe company Secretary, who are appointed by the Board of Assicurazioni Generali SpA, of LSEG plc (London Stock Exchange Group), of Veolia Environment (Paris),Directors.

Senior Managers

Claudio Descalzi Born in 1955. Chief Operating Officer of the Board of Overseers of Columbia Business School (New York) and of the Board of Fondazione Teatro alla Scala. He was Chairman of Alliance Unichem plc (UK) from 2005 toExploration & Production Division since July 2006. In November 2007 he was made a member of the Légion d’honneur of France.

119


Alberto Clô graduated2008. Graduated in Political Science. He is Associate Professor of Industrial EconomicsPhysics in 1979 at the University of Bologna and from 1995 to 1996 he was Minister of Industry and interim Minister of Foreign Trade ad interim in 1995 and 1996. During the Italian presidency of the European Union he was Chairman of the Council of Ministers of Industry and Energy of the European Union. In 1996 he was awarded the title of Cavaliere di Gran Croce al Merito of the Republic of Italy. Until December 31, 2007 he was director of ASM Brescia SpA. Currently he is non-executive director of Atlantia SpA, Italcementi SpA and De Longhi SpA. He has been an independent Director of Eni SpA since May 1999.

Paolo Andrea Colombo graduated in Business Economics from the Bocconi University and qualified as a professional accountant and auditor in 1985. He is professor of Accounting and Financial Reporting at the Bocconi University, Milan. He is partner of Borghesi Colombo & Associati, a consultancy firm specialized in corporate finance, mergers and acquisitions, strategy and corporate governance. He is a member of the Board of Directors of Mediaset, Interbanca, Ceresio Sim and Versace, and member of the Board of Statutory Auditors of Interbanca, Aviva Vita, Sirti, A. Moratti Sapa, Humanitas Mirasole, Credit Agricole Assicurazioni Italia. In Eni, he was member of the Board of Statutory Auditors/Audit Committee (2002-2005) and Chairman of the same Board for a three year period until June 2008. He has been Chairman of Eni’s audit committee since May 2005. He has been an independent Director of Eni since June 2008.

Paolo Marchioni is a qualified lawyer specialising in penal and administrative law. He acts as a consultant to government agencies and business organizations on business, corporate, administrative and local government law. He was Mayor of Baveno (Verbania) from April 1995 to June 2004 and Chairman of the Assembly of Mayors of Con.Ser.Vco from September 1995 to June 1999. He served in various positions within government agencies. From October 2001 to April 2004 he was a director of Cim SpA of Novara (merchandise interport center), from December 2002 to December 2005 a director and executive committee member of Finpiemonte SpA and from June 2005 to June 2008 director of Consip SpA. He has been an independent Director of Eni since June 2008.

Marco Reboa graduated in Business Administration from the Bocconi University, Milan. He is a chartered accountant and public auditor. He is Professor of law at the Libero Istituto Universitario Carlo Cattaneo in Castellanza and author of essays on corporate governance, economic and legal issues. He is the editor of "Rivista dei Dottori Commercialisti" and is a professional advisor in Milan. He is a member of the Board of Directors of Seat PG SpA, Interpump Group SpA, IMMSI SpA and Intesa Private Banking SpA. He is Chairman of the Board of Statutory Auditors of Luxottica Group SpA and Mediobanca SpA. He is an auditor of Gruppo Lactalis Italia SpA and Egidio Galbani SpA. He has been an independent Director of Eni SpA since May 2005.

Mario Resca graduated in Economics from the Bocconi University, Milan. He is Chairman of Italia Zuccheri SpA (formerly Eridania SpA), Casinò di Campione SpA and Confimprese. He is Director of Mondadori SpA, ARFIN SpA (insurances) and Finance Leasing SpA. He is Vice Chairman and venture partner of McDonald’s Development Italia, Inc and advisor of British Telecom Italia. As a graduate he worked for the Chase Manhattan Bank. In 1974 he was appointed director of Biondi Finanziaria (Fiat Group) and from 1976 to 1991 he was partner of Egon Zehnder. In this period he was appointed director of Lancôme Italia and of companies belonging to the Rizzoli-Corriere della Sera Group and Versace Group. He was Chairman of the American Chamber of Commerce. He also served as Chairman of Sambonet SpA, Kenwood Italia SpA and was a founding partner of Eric Salmon & Partners. In 2008, he was appointed General Director of Italian Museums by the Government. He has been an independent Director of Eni SpA since 2002.

Pierluigi Scibetta graduated in Economics from the University La Sapienza, Rome. He is a chartered accountant and auditor and has been appointed director and auditor of a number of public bodies and companies. In 2003 he was appointed director of the Istituto Superiore per la Previdenza e la Sicurezza sul Lavoro - ISPESL (the State Agency for Employee Safety) and of Gestore del Mercato Elettrico SpA. He lectures in Environmental Economics at the University of Perugia. He has been an independent Director of Eni SpA since May 2005.

Francesco Taranto graduated in Economics from the Catholic University of Milan. He began working in 1959, in a stock brokerage in Milan; from 1965 to 1982 he worked at Banco di Napoli, as deputy director of the stock market and securities office. He was director of securities funds at Eurogest from 1982 to 1984, general director and chief executive officer of Interbancaria Gestioni from 1984 to 1987. After moving to the Prime group (1987 to 2000), he was chief executive officer of the parent company. He has also been a member of the steering council of Assogestioni and of the corporate governance committee for listed companies formed by Borsa Italiana. He was a director of Enel SpA from October 2000 to June 2008, and is currently a member of the Board of directors of Banca Carige, Cassa di Risparmio di Firenze, Unicredit Xelion Banca, Pioneer Global Asset Management (Unicredito group) and Kedrios. He has been an independent Director of Eni since June 2008.

Claudio Descalzi graduated in Physics from the University of Milan, and attended specialist courses in Petroleum Engineering in France and USA. He joined the Eni Group in 1981 as oil & oil/gas field petroleum engineeringEngineering and project manager. He servedProject Manager, following the development of North Sea, Libya, Nigeria, and Congo fields. In 1990 he was appointed head of operational activities for Italy. In 1994 he was named Director of Agip Recherches Congo, with responsibility for all local upstream operations, and in various managing positions1998 become Vice Chairman & Managing Director of Naoc, an Eni subsidiary in Nigeria. From 2000 to 2001 he was Regional Manager for Africa, Middle East and China at the Agip Division, where in 2002 he was appointed Country Manager for Italy. From 2002 to 2005 he was Regional Manager for Italy, Africa, Middle East at the Eni Exploration & Production Division. InDivision, and in 2006 he was appointedhas been named Deputy Chief Operating Officer of the Exploration & Production Division and

120


Chairman of Assomineraria. In 2008 he was appointed Chief Operating Officer of Eni’sEni Exploration & Production Division.

Domenico Dispenza graduated in Aeronautical Engineering from the Politecnico of Milan and obtained a Master’s Degree in Advanced Technologies. He joined Snam’s study department in 1974. He served in various managing positions in Eni Group companies engaged in natural gas activities. In 2004 he was elected Chairman and CEO of Snam Rete Gas SpA and in Since 2006 he was appointedhas been President of Assomineraria. He is Vice President of Confindustria Energy.

Domenico Dispenza Born in 1946. Chief Operating Officer of Eni’s Gas & Power Division.

Angelo Caridi graduatedDivision since January 2006. Graduated in CivilAeronautical Engineering at the "Politecnico di Milano" University, in 1973 he completed a Master’s degree in Advanced Technology at Sogesta in Urbino. He began working in 1974 at the Study Department of Snam SpA, in 1977 he became head of Systems Analysis and from the Politecnico of Turin. He joined Snamprogetti in 1970. He served in various managing positions within Eni’s Group companies. In 20021980 to 1991 he was Chief Negotiator for Gas Sales and Purchase Agreement. From 1991 to 1999 he was Director Gas Supplies. On June 30, 1999 he was appointed Managing Director of Snam SpA. From 2002 to 2004 he was Deputy COO of Eni’s Gas & Power Division. On April 27, 2004 he was nominated Chairman and CEO of SnamprogettiSnam Rete Gas.

Angelo Caridi Born in 2005. In August 2007 he was appointed1947. Chief Operating Officer of Eni’sEni SpA - Refining & Marketing Division since August 20079. Graduated in Civil Engineering at the "Politecnico di Torino" University. He joined Snamprogetti in


(9)Until March 2010.

130


1970 and he was the Manager of the Civil Engineering department in Rome from 1978 until 1984. After four years’ experience as Manager of the Civil Engineering Division, he was appointed Manager of Environmental Impact Assessment Business Unit and, in 1990, Marketing Manager of Infrastructures Division in Italy. In 1991 he became Director of the Rome engineering centre. He was then appointed Chairman and Managing Director of Aquater and Chairman of CEPAV Uno Consortium, in 1993. In 2001 he was also appointed Director of the Infrastructures Division. In 2002 was appointed Managing Director of Snamprogetti and in July 2005 Chief Executive Officer. He is non-executive directorDirector of Saipem SpA.SpA – a company listed on Borsa Italiana SpA (the Italian Stock Exchange) – since 2006.

Alessandro Bernini started Born in 1960. Chief Financial Officer of Eni since August 2008. Started his career in 1979 at the auditing firm Neutra Revisioni Sas.Sas, in Milan, first as Junior Accountant in the Auditing Activities Department then as Accountant in Charge. In 1981, he joined Ernst & Young thereafter becoming Senior, Supervisor and inManager. In 1995 he was appointed Partner. On September 1,Partner of the Company and Chartered Accountant Manager for the Areas of Piacenza, Parma and Cremona and Technical Manager for the branch based in Brescia. In the same period he was also engaged as Lecturer for post graduate Master Degree courses in the Universities of Pavia and Parma. In 1996 he joined the Eni Group in the quality of Chief Financial Officeras Administration Department Manager of Saipem SpA, andSpA. In 2006 was appointed Group Chief Financial Officer forof Saipem SpA. He has covered executive managerial roles in many important companies of the Saipem Group.

Massimo Mantovani Born in 1963. Senior Executive Vice President of Legal Affair Department of Eni SpA since 2005. Graduated in Law and achieved a Master in Law (LLM) at the University of London. He has been appointed Chief Financial Officeris registered to practice law in Italy and in England. For around 5 years he worked for a number of the Eni Grouplaw firms in August 2008.

Massimo Mantovani is an attorney at lawMilan and worked as a legal counsel for international activitiesLondon before joining Snam’sthe legal officedepartment of Snam SpA in 1993. He was responsible forof legal affairs at Eni���sof Eni’s Gas & Power Division untilDivision. Since 2005 he was appointed Eni’shas been a member of the Board of Directors of Snam Rete Gas SpA and is a member of the Eni Watch Structure.

Rita Marino Born in 1964. Chief Internal Auditor since July 2005 and Senior Executive Vice President for legal affairs in 2005.

Rita Marino has a degree cum laudeof the Internal Control System since March 2007. Graduated in Economics from theand Business in 1987 at LUISS andUniversity in Rome, she worked in Stet and then in Telecom Italia where she spent most her professional career, carrying out several managerial assignments in the Planning and Control Department. She has also achieved a well-established experience in the Merger & Acquisition Department, managing several and important corporate transactions. In March 2003 she started working for Enel where she was Head of the Strategy, Control and Procurement Processes Area andas well as Head of the Corporate Procurement. She was also Chief Operating Officer in a company of the Enel Group and member of the board of several companies of Telecom Italia Group and Enel Group. She has been Chiefis currently member of theEni Watch Structure and Secretary of Eni Internal Auditing DepartmentControl Committee.

Stefano Lucchini Born in 1962. Senior Executive Vice President of Public Affairs and Corporate Communication since July 1, 2005 when she joined Eni.

Stefano Lucchini graduated2005. Graduated in Economics fromat LUISS University in Rome. He started in the LUISS in Rome and joined the studyresearch department ofat Montedison. After a period in the United States, where he wasas assistant to the ChairmanPresident of the Energy and Commerce Commission of the U.S. Congress in Washington D.C., he was headDirector of communications at Montedison USA. InUSA in New York. Returning to Italy in 1993, he returned to Italywas responsible for financial communications and wasinvestor relations for the Gruppo Ferruzzi Montedison. He joined Enel in 1997, initially in financial communications and subsequently as the group’s head of external relations. He has also been the investorhead of external relations departmentfor Confindustria. In June 2002 he was appointed head of external relations for the Ferruzzi and MontedisonBanca Intesa Group. He was then Director for external relationsteaches at Enelthe Advanced School of Journalism at Università Cattolica in Milan, and later atis a member of its evaluation committee. He has been a member of the Board of Directors of AGI since 2005. He is also Commendatore della Repubblica Italiana and a Silver Medalist of Croce Rossa Italiana. Since 2007 he has been a member of the supervisory board of Confindustria and Banca Intesa.the executive board of UPA. He joinedis also a member of the boards of Censis, the Fondazione Eni asEnrico Mattei (FEEM) and the Eni Foundation.

Leonardo Maugeri Born in 1964. Senior Executive Vice President for Public Affairsof Strategy and Communication in 2005.Development since 200010. He is also a professor at the School for Journalism of the Università Cattolica in Milan.

Leonardo Maugeri has two degrees and a research doctorate, after extensive academic experience acquired in Italy and abroad, joined theabroad. Joined Eni Group in 1994, holding various positions mainly as counsel for strategic decisions before being appointed as Senior Executive Vice President for Strategies and Development Department. Maugeri is also a directorDirector of Polimeri Europa SpA, Italgas and the Fondazione Mattei. He is member of the Energy Advisory Board and the World Economic Laboratory of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), as well as the International Councillor Board of the CenterCentre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS - Washington, D.C.), the Energy Advisory Board of Accenture, the Foreign Policy Association (New York) and the Rand Business Forum (Los Angeles).

Salvatore Sardo graduated Born in Economics from the University of Turin and started his career as an auditor for Coopers & Lybrand. He later joined Telecom Italia where, after the privatization of the company, he was responsible for administration and control. He was Chairman of Pagine Gialle from 1998 to 2001 and returned to Telecom Italia as manager of the Group’s real estate and general services. From 2003 he was procurement and security manager at Enel until 2005 when he joined Eni to become Senior Vice President for Human Resources & Business Services. In 2008 he has been appointed1952. Chief Corporate Operations Officer of Eni.Eni SpA since November 2008. Graduated in Economics at University of Torino. From 1976 to 1981 at Coopers & Lybrand as auditor, reaching the position of Supervisor. From 1981 at Stet, head of management control for manufacturing. Co-Central Director in 1991 and Central Director for Planning and Control. Nominated in 1997 Deputy General Manager for Finance and Control at Telecom Italia. From 1998 to June 2001, President of Seat Pagine Gialle SpA. From 1999 Operational


(10)Until March 2010.

131


Head of Comparto Immobiliare di Gruppo. President of EMSA, President and Managing Director of EMSA Servizi and President and Managing Director of IMMSI, as well as Executive President of TELIMM, IMSER and Telemaco. From 2001 Head of the Real Estate and General Services business unit at Telecom Italia. From 2003 head of Procurement, Services and Security of Enel Group. From 2005 Director of Human Resources and Business Services at Eni SpA, also assuring guidance and control of the Information & Communication Technology Unit and the company EniServizi.

Roberto Ulissi Born in 1962. Senior Executive Vice President Corporate Affairs and Governance since 2006. He is an attorney at law.a lawyer. After somea number years spent as lawyer at the Banca d’Italia as an in-house legal counselBank of Italy, in 1998 he became Directorwas nominated General ofManager at the Ministry of the Economy and Finance, head of the "Banking and Finance System and Legal Affairs Department". He was a Director of state-owned companies, such as Telecom Italia, Ferrovie dello Stato, Alitalia, Fincantieri and Governmenta government representative inon the Supreme Council of the Bank of Italy’s governing council.Italy. He was also a member of several nationalnumerous Italian and European committees as a representativeCommissions representing the Ministry of the Italian Ministry of Economy, including, at a national level, the Commission for the Reform of Corporate Law and, at an EU level, the Financial Services Policy Group, the Banking Advisory Committee, the European Banking Committee, the European Securities Committee, and the Financial Services Committee. He haswas also been special professor of banking law at the University of Cassino. He is a Grande Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana. Since 2006 he has been appointed Senior Executive Vice President for Corporate Affairs and Governance Department at EniItaliana and a member of the boardBoard of Eni International BV. He also holds the position of Company Secretary on the Board of Directors of Eni.

121


Raffaella Leone worked for Techint SpA, Pilkington Plc and Enel SpA before joining Eni in 2005 as Executive Assistant to the CEO.CEO of Eni since 2005. She is President of Servizi Aerei SpA, Vice President of Eni Foundation, and member of the Board of Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, as well as memberDirectors of the news agency AGI (Agenzia Giornalistica Italia) and of the Board of otherDirectors of the Fondazione Eni companies.Enrico Mattei. Previously she was the Executive Assistant to the CEOs of Enel (from May 2002 to 2005) and of Pilkington (from 1996 to May 2002).

 

Compensation

Board members’ emoluments are determined by the Shareholders’ Meeting, while the emoluments of the Chairman and CEO, in relation to the powers entrusted to them, are determined by the Board of Directors considering relevant proposals made by the Compensation Committee and after consultation with the Board of Statutory Auditors.

Main elements of the compensation of the Chairman, the CEO, other Board members and Eni’s three General Managers are described below.

CHAIRMAN
The compensation of the Chairman of the Board of Directors has been resolved by Eni’s Shareholders’ Meeting and includes:

(a)a base salary of euro 265,000 and reimbursement of out of pocket expenses; and
(b)a bonus which amount is determined in accordance with the performance of Eni shares in the reference year as compared with the performance of the seven largest international oil companies for market capitalization, taking account of the dividend paid. This bonus will amount to euro 80,000 or euro 40,000, depending on whether the performance of Eni shares is rated first or second, or third or fourth in the reference year, respectively. No bonus is paid in case Eni scores a position lower than the fourth one. In 2008, Eni rated fourth and in 2009 a bonus of euro 40,000 was paid.

With regard to the powers delegated to the Chairman, the Board of Directors determined further compensation, as follows:

(a)an annual emolument of euro 500,000; and
(b)an annual performance bonus based on the achievements of the Company’s target determined in the same way as for the CEO (see below). In 2009, based on 2008 Eni’s results, a bonus equal to 120% of the target level was determined, within an interval ranging from 85% to 130% of said target level. The target level of the bonus is 60% of the annual emolument. In 2009, this bonus amounted to euro 360,000.

Compensation of the Chairman also includes an insurance against death or permanent inability caused by injury or sickness in the exercise of his duties or under certain other circumstances as stipulated collectively for all managers of Italian companies producing goods and services. In particular, a specific insurance policy has been underwritten which guarantees euro 500,000 to survivors.

CEO
Compensation for the CEO has been resolved by the Board of Directors of Eni in connection with his position both as CEO and as General Manager of the parent company Eni SpA.

132


As General Manager of Eni SpA, his terms of employment are regulated by the "Contratto collettivo nazionale di lavoro per i dirigenti di aziende produttrici di beni e servizi" (the Italian national collective contract for managers of companies producing goods and services), as well as by any internal agreement stipulated by the representatives of managers and Eni SpA.

The CEO compensation includes the following items:

(a)an annual fixed amount of euro 1,430,000, including a base salary of euro 1,000,000 for the services as General Manager and an emolument of euro 430,000 for the services as CEO;
(b)an annual performance bonus based on the achievement of the Company targets. These targets are approved by the Board of Directors on proposal of the Compensation Committee and defined consistently with the targets of the strategic plan and yearly budget. In 2008, said targets included a set level of adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) (with a 40% weight), divisional operating performances (30%), reduction of Company’s costs (20%) and maintaining of ranking within certain sustainability indexes (10%). Results achieved have been assessed assuming a constant trading environment and have been verified by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board of Directors. The target and maximum amount of this bonus corresponds for the period from January 1 to June 10, 2008 respectively to 77% and 100% and for the period from June 11 to December 31, 2008 respectively to 110% and 155% of the fixed amount under a) above. In 2009, based on 2008 Eni’s results, a bonus equal to 120% of the target level was determined, within an interval ranging from 85% to 130% and a bonus of euro 1,699,000 was paid;
(c)a long-term incentive under the incentive scheme as approved by the Board of Directors on March 25, 2009 as proposed by the Compensation Committee. This incentive scheme provides a deferred monetary incentive with a target level corresponding to 55% of the fixed amount under a) above. The bonus will vest over the next three years upon achievement of certain preset Company annual targets in terms of EBITDA for the reference three-year period. Vested amounts will range from 0 to 170% of the award. The 2009 bonus that was awarded to the CEO amounted to euro 786,500.
Taking into account that on the same occasion, the Board of Directors decided to discontinue the stock option plan, based on the resolution of the Compensation Committee, and in force of the contractual obligation to the CEO of adopting an alternative incentive scheme with same economic effects, in order to replace and compensate for the discontinued stock option incentive the CEO was awarded a further deferred monetary bonus whose value and characteristics are comparable with those of the former plan. The bonus will vest over the next three years upon achievement of certain performance targets in terms of variation of the Adjusted Net Profit + DD&A (Depletion Depreciation & Amortization) as compared to that of the other six largest international oil companies for market capitalization for the reference three-year period. The 2009 bonus that was awarded to the CEO amounted to euro 2,716,391 and will be paid in 2012 according to a percentage ranging from 0 to 130% of the awarded amount in relation to the performance achieved in the reference three-year period.
In 2009, the 2006 long-term incentive scheme approved in March 2006 by the Board of Directors as proposed by the Compensation Committee vested. This incentive scheme provided: (i) a deferred monetary incentive, linked to the achievement of certain Company’s financial performance annual targets in terms of EBITDA; and (ii) a stock option awards which vested upon achievement of certain performance targets of the Eni share measured in terms of Total Shareholder Return (TSR) that considers both the stock appreciation and the dividend, as compared to that achieved by the other six largest international oil companies for market capitalization over the three-year vesting period. Under this scheme, based on results achieved in the 2006-2008 three-year period, the CEO received:
(i)an amount equal to 143% of the deferred monetary incentive that was granted in 2006 with a target level corresponding to 55% of the fixed amount under a) above. In 2006, this award was accrued for euro 786,500; and
(ii)an award of stock options corresponding to 47% of options granted in 2006 (681,000 rights with a strike price of euro 23.1 per share corresponding to the arithmetic average of official prices registered on the Mercato Telematico Azionario in the month preceding the grant);
(d)severance payments as regulated by Italian laws, which consist of a lump sum to be paid to the employee upon retirement. To this end, the Company recognizes yearly accruals computed by dividing the total remuneration earned as General Manager (base salary, bonuses and stock compensation) by 13.5. The amounts accrued are revaluated yearly at a fixed rate of 1.5% plus the 75% of the yearly official consumer price index increase;
(e)as an integration to the severance payment described above, should the employment contract of Mr. Scaroni as General Manager of Eni SpA be terminated upon expiry of the term of his office as CEO or upon earlier termination of such office, he will be entitled to receive a payment of euro 3,200,000 plus an amount corresponding to the average performance bonus earned in the three-year period 2008-2010, in lieu of notice thus waiving both parties from any obligation related to notice. This amount will not be paid if the termination of office meets the requirement of due cause as per Article 2119 of the Italian Civil Code, in case of death and in case of resignation from office other than as the result of a reduction in the powers currently attributed to the CEO. Furthermore, upon expiry of the contract as employee of Eni, the CEO in his capacity as General Manager of the parent company is entitled to receive an indemnity that is accrued along the service period by taking into account social security contribution rates and post-

133


retirement benefit computations applied to the CEO annual emolument and 50% of the maximum bonuses earned as a Director. A provision of euro 244,435.07 was accrued in 2009;
(f)competition clause: the CEO agrees not to be engaged, on his own account and directly, in any business that may be in competition with the businesses of Eni, as per its By-laws, in Italy, Europe and North America for a year after termination of office. Based on this arrangement, Eni will pay a fee corresponding to euro 2,219,000. As a consequence of any breach of this clause, the CEO would lose the right to such fee and reimburse any amount already paid, and shall pay to Eni damages in an amount agreed among the parties to correspond to twice such non-competition fee;
(g)the pension scheme corresponds to the scheme applied to Eni managers and provided by INPS (the Italian state social security entity) to all Italian workers. In addition, the CEO is included in an additional pension scheme under the form of an Eni Group pension fund agreed collectively by Eni and Eni managers which provides integration, in the form of a lump sum payment or perpetuity, to the pension paid by the State. This integration is proportional to contributions to the fund made by both the manager and the Company in equal amounts. The integration is awarded to the manager when eligible for the payment of the pension from the State, provided that a minimum time period has elapsed according to the Fund By-laws. An agreement signed on March 20, 2006, established that the Company’s and the manager’s payment to this fund amounts to 3.5% of total emoluments earned by the CEO in his position as General Manager (i.e. the aggregate of the annual salary and bonuses up to a maximum of euro 200,000);
(h)like all other Eni managers, Mr. Scaroni is entitled to participate in a health insurance fund financed by Eni managers and Eni which provides reimbursement of certain medical expenses on the basis of rules and parameters as provided by the Fund’s By-laws; and
(i)insurance against death or permanent inability caused by injury or disease in the exercise of his duties or under certain other circumstances as stipulated collectively for all managers of Italian manufacturing companies. In particular a specific insurance policy has been underwritten on behalf of Mr. Scaroni which guarantees euro 7.5 million to beneficiaries in case of death or disability, however determined.

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The compensation of members of the Board of Directors has been determined by Eni’s Shareholders’ Meeting and includes:

(a)an annual emolument of euro 115,000 and reimbursement of out of pocket expenses; and
(b)a bonus determined in accordance with the performance of the Eni share in the reference year as compared with the performance of the seven largest international oil companies for market capitalization, taking account of the dividend paid. This bonus will amount to euro 20,000 or euro 10,000 depending on whether the performance of Eni shares is rated first or second, or third or fourth in the reference year, respectively. No bonus is paid in case Eni scores a position lower than the fourth one. In 2008, Eni rated fourth and in 2009 a bonus of euro 10,000 was paid.

The Board of Directors in the meeting of June 11, 2008, as proposed by the Compensation Committee and advised by the Board of Statutory Auditors, confirmed the additional element of remuneration for the Board members holding positions in Board’s committees, with the exclusion of the Chairman and CEO. Said fee amounts to euro 30,000, and euro 20,000 for the position of chairman of a committee and of member of a committee, respectively. This amount decreases to euro 27,000 and euro 18,000 in case a member holds positions in more than one committee.

GENERAL MANAGERS
The terms of employment of the General Managers of Eni’s Divisions are regulated by the "Contratto collettivo nazionale di lavoro per i dirigenti di aziende produttrici di beni e servizi" (the Italian national collective contract for managers of companies producing goods and services), as well as by any internal agreement stipulated by the representatives of managers and Eni SpA. The General Managers of Divisions may be appointed as members of the Board of Directors of Eni subsidiaries and affiliates; compensation deriving from such appointments as provided for by Article 2389 of the Italian Civil Code is to be repaid to Eni as it is included in their remuneration under section a) below.

Their remuneration includes:

(a)a base salary, defined considering the position held and their specific responsibilities, with reference to appropriate market levels as benchmarked against national and international companies of comparable size, complexity and scope in the oil and gas, industrial and service sectors. Base salaries are reviewed and adjusted on a yearly basis considering individual performance and career progression;
(b)a performance bonus paid yearly, based on the achievement of specific financial, operational and strategic targets and of individual performance goals pertaining to each business units defined consistently with the Company’s targets in the strategic plan and yearly budget. The target level of the bonus corresponds to 60% of the base salary;
(c)a long-term incentives in the form of a deferred monetary bonus linked to the achievement of certain Company’s financial performance annual targets in terms of EBITDA, according to the same scheme as

134


the CEO. Under this scheme the three General Managers have received in 2009 a yearly award of the deferred monetary bonus of 47% of the base salary. The Board of Directors on March 25, 2009 as proposed by the Compensation Committee resolved to discontinue the stock option plan;
(d)a severance payment as regulated by Italian laws, which consists of a lump sum to be paid to the employee upon retirement. To this end, the Company recognizes yearly accruals computed by dividing the yearly remuneration (base salary, bonuses and stock compensation) by 13.5. These amounts are revaluated yearly at the rate of 1.5% plus the 75% of the official yearly consumer price index increase;
(e)the pension scheme corresponds to the scheme applied to Eni managers and provided by INPS to all Italian workers. In addition, the General Managers are included in the additional pension scheme of Eni managers which provides an integration to the public pension. For further details see section g) of the description of compensation of the CEO;
(f)like all other Eni managers, they are entitled to participate in a health insurance Fund financed by Eni managers and Eni which provides reimbursement of certain medical expenses on the basis of rules and parameters as provided for by the Fund’s By-laws; and
(g)an insurance against death or permanent inability caused by injury or disease in the exercise of his duties or under certain other circumstances as stipulated collectively for all managers of Italian manufacturing companies.

With the exception of the CEO as described above, none of the Directors of Eni has service contracts with the company or any of its subsidiaries providing for benefits upon termination of employment.

Remuneration earned for 2009 by members of the Board of Directors, including the CEO and the Chairman, the three Chief Operating Officers and Eni’s senior managers attending on a permanent basis the meetings of the Steering Committee of Eni (total amount) is reported in the table below. Emoluments earned by the Statutory Auditors of Eni are also included.

NamePosition

Emoluments for service at Eni SpA

Non-cash benefits

Bonus and other incentives (a)

Salaries and other elements

Total








(euro thousand)


Board of Directors            
Roberto Poli Chairman 

765

   

400

   

1,165

Paolo Scaroni CEO 

430

 

1

 

2,824

 

1,017

 

4,272

Alberto Clô Director 

162

   

10

   

172

Paolo Andrea Colombo Director 

96

   

10

   

106

Paolo Marchioni Director 

107

   

10

   

117

Marco Reboa Director 

163

   

10

   

173

Mario Resca Director 

162

   

10

   

172

Pierluigi Scibetta Director 

96

   

10

   

106

Francesco Taranto Director 

153

   

10

   

163

Board of Statutory Auditors            
Ugo Marinelli Chairman 

121

       

121

Roberto Ferranti (b) Auditor 

84

       

84

Luigi Mandolesi Auditor 

84

       

84

Tiziano Onesti (c) Auditor 

84

     

40

 

124

Giorgio Silva Auditor 

44

       

44

Divisional Chief Operating Officers            
Claudio Descalzi Exploration & Production   

3

 

772

 

734

 

1,509

Domenico Dispenza Gas & Power   

1

 

1,002

 

745

 

1,748

Angelo Caridi Refining & Marketing   

2

 

648

 

642

 

1,292

Other managers with strategic responsibilities (d)     

15

 

4,179

 

4,266

 

8,460

    

2,551

 

22

 

9,895

 

7,444

 

19,912


 
 
 
 
 
 

(a)Based on the annual incentive plan related to performance achieved in 2008 (euro 6,283 thousand) and payment of the deferred monetary incentive granted in 2006 (euro 3,612 thousand).
(b)Compensation for the service is paid to the Ministry for Economy and Finance.
(c)Includes the compensation obtained as Chairman of the Board of Statutory Auditors of AGI and Servizi Aerei.
(d)Managers who, during the year, have been members of Eni’s Management Committee with the CEO and the Divisional Chief Operating Officers, and Eni Senior Executive Vice Presidents who report directly to the CEO (8 managers).

The items provided in the table above report the following elements of compensation:

"Emoluments for service at Eni SpA" include emoluments paid to non-executive and executive directors for service rendered, fixed fees paid to Directors attending the Board’s Committees, and fees paid to Statutory Auditors. Emoluments earned by the Chairman and the CEO include also the portion awarded for the powers entrusted to them by the Board;

135


"Non cash benefits" comprise amounts referring to all fringe benefits, including insurance policies;
"Bonuses and other incentives" include: (i) performance bonuses awarded in the year to Directors and the Chairman of the Board based on the performance of the Eni share; (ii) performance bonuses awarded in the year to both the Chairman and the CEO in connection with the power entrusted to them by the Board, based on the achievement of specific company targets; and (iii) performance bonuses awarded in the year to the CEO, in his position as General Manager of the parent company, the General Managers of Eni’s divisions and other managers with strategic responsibilities based on the achievement of specific financial, operational and strategic targets and of individual performance targets pertaining to their respective business or functional units; and
"Salaries and other elements" report base salaries paid to the CEO, the General Mangers of Eni’s Divisions and other managers with strategic responsibilities, and indemnities paid upon termination of the employment contract.

For the year ended December 31, 2009, the overall compensation of persons responsible of key positions in planning, direction and control functions of Eni Group companies, including executive and non-executive directors, Chief Operating Officers and Eni’s senior managers amounted to euro 35 million and was accrued in Eni’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009. The break-down is as follows:

2009


(euro million)

Fees and salaries20
Post employment benefits1
Other long-term benefits10
Fair value stock grants/options4
35

The above amounts include salaries, fees for attending meetings, lump-sum amounts paid in lieu of expense reimbursements, stock-based compensation and other deferred incentive bonuses, health and pension contributions and amounts accrued to the reserve for employee termination indemnities, which is used to pay severance pay as required by Italian law to employees upon termination of employment. The members of the Board of Directors in their capacity as such are not entitled to receive such severance pay. As of December 31, 2009, the total amount accrued to the reserve for employee termination indemnities with respect to members of the Board of Directors who were also employees of Eni, the three divisional Chief Operating Officers and Eni’s senior managers was euro 1,621 thousand.

The break-down of this amount is presented in the table below:

Name

(euro thousand)


Paolo ScaroniCEO and Chief Operating Officer of Eni167
Claudio DescalziChief Operating Officer of the E&P Division305
Domenico DispenzaChief Operating Officer of the G&P Division426
Angelo CaridiChief Operating Officer of the R&M Division150
Senior managers (a)573

1,621


(a)No. 8 managers.

Long-term Incentive Schemes

On March 25, 2009, the Board of Directors resolved to terminate the Eni Stock Option Plan for 2009 and to maintain the Deferred Monetary Incentive Plan for the three-year period 2009-2011. This Plan, which is aimed at all managerial resources and is focused on certain business growth and operating efficiency targets, provides for an incentive to be paid after a period of three years in an amount connected with the achievement of annual EBITDA objectives (actual results vs. budget, on a constant scenario basis) defined for the reference three-year period. See below for further details.

136


In order to adopt an alternative incentive scheme to Stock Option Plan, the Compensation Committee defined a new long-term incentive plan for critical managerial resources that will be approved by the Board of Directors in 2010. In 2009 the Board of Directors approved a plan with similar characteristics for the CEO; this plan provides for an incentive to be paid after a period of three years in an amount connected with the variation of the adjusted net profit + DD&A (Depletion, Depreciation & Amortization), measured over the three-year period 2009-2011 in relative terms compared to the other six largest international oil companies for market capitalization.

In 2009, the vesting period of the long-term incentive plan assigned in 2006 expired. This plan consisted of a Deferred Monetary Incentive Plan, aimed at managerial resources, and a Stock Option Plan, aimed only at managerial resources holding positions that are more directly responsible for results and are of strategic interest. The Board of Directors, on March 25, 2009, based on the results achieved in 2006-2008, as verified by the Compensation Committee, resolved that: (i) with reference to the Deferred Monetary Incentive Plan, a multiplier of 143% should be applied to the amount awarded in 2006, calculated on the basis of the performance achieved in terms of Eni’s EBITDA; and (ii) with reference to the Stock Option Plan, a percentage of 47% of exercisable options, calculated on the basis of the performance achieved in terms of Eni’s relative TSR, should be applied to the total amount granted in 2006.

The CEO, in his quality of General Manager, participated in both Plans.

Deferred monetary bonus

The deferred bonus scheme approved for the 2009-2011 three-year period provides for the award of a basic monetary bonus to be paid after three years from grant according to a variable amount equal to a percentage ranging from 0 to 170% of the amount established for the target performance in relation to the performances achieved in a three-year period as approved by the Board of Directors. The following table sets out the basic bonus awarded in the year 2009 to the CEO and to the Divisional Chief Operating Officers, and the total amount awarded to Eni’s senior managers.

Name

Deferred bonus awarded


(euro thousand)

Paolo ScaroniCEO and Chief Operating Officer of Eni787
Claudio DescalziChief Operating Officer of the E&P Division340
Domenico DispenzaChief Operating Officer of the G&P Division350
Angelo CaridiChief Operating Officer of the R&M Division307
Senior managers (a)1,612


(a)No. 8 managers.

Stock Options

Following the decision of Eni’s Board of Directors to discontinue any stock option plans from 2009, information reported herein on Eni’s stock based compensation relates to plans adopted in previous years whereby options to purchase treasury shares were awarded for no consideration to managers of Eni and its subsidiaries as defined in the Article 2359 of the Civil Code holding positions of significant responsibility for achieving the Company’s profitability targets or are otherwise strategically important. The stock option scheme provided that grantees had the right to purchase treasury shares in a 1 to 1 ratio, with a strike price calculated as the arithmetic average of official prices registered on the Mercato Telematico Azionario in the month preceding award or, if greater, as the average carrying cost of treasury shares held by Eni as of the date preceding the award.

The most recent stock option scheme covered the three-year period 2006-2008 and was approved on May 25, 2006, by the Shareholders’ Meeting that authorized the Board of Directors to dispose of a maximum amount of 30 million treasury shares (equal to 0.749% of the share capital) for the stock option plan. This stock option plan also provided a performance condition upon which options can be exercised. At the end of each vesting period with a three-year duration, the Board of Directors determined the number of exercisable options, in a percentage ranging from 0% to 100% of the total amount awarded for each year of the scheme, depending on the performance of Eni shares measured in terms of Total Shareholder Return as compared to that achieved by a panel of major international oil companies in terms of market capitalization. Options may be exercised upon fulfillment of all conditions after three years from the award and within the next three years.

137


As of December 31, 2009, a total of 19,482,330 options were outstanding for the purchase of an equal amount of ordinary shares nominal value euro 1.00 of Eni SpA, carrying an average strike price of euro 23.576.

The following is a summary of residual stock option activity as there were no options granted in 2009:

 

2008

 

2009

 
 

Number of shares

Weighted average exercise price
(euro)

Market price (a)
(euro)

Number of shares

Weighted average exercise price
(euro)

Market price (a)
(euro)







Options as of January 1 17,699,625  23.822 25.120 23,557,425 23.540 16.556
New options granted 7,415,000  22.540 22.538      
Options exercised in the period (582,100) 17.054 24.328 2,000 13.743 16.207
Options cancelled in the period (975,100) 24.931 19.942 4,073,095 23.374 14.866
Options outstanding as of December 31 23,557,425  23.540 16.556 19,482,330 23.576 17.811
of which exercisable as of December 31 5,184,250  21.263 16.556 7,298,155 21.843 17.811







(a)Market price relating to new rights assigned, rights exercised in the period and rights cancelled in the period correspond to the average market value (arithmetic average of official prices recorded on Mercato Telematico Azionario in the month preceding: (i) the date of assignment; (ii) the date of the recording in the securities account of the managers to whom the options have been assigned; and (iii) the date of the unilateral termination of employment for rights cancelled). Market price of shares referring to options as of the beginning and the end of the year, is the price recorded as of December 31.

The following table presents the amount of stock options awarded to Eni’s CEO, the three Chief Operating Officers and Eni’s senior managers.

CEO and General Manager
of
Eni

COO of
E&P Division

COO of
G&P Division

COO of
R&M Division

Senior managers (a)






Paolo
Scaroni (b)

Claudio
Descalzi

Domenico
Dispenza

Angelo
Caridi






Options outstanding at the beginning of the period:                
- number of options 

2,587,500

 

264,000

 

380,000

142,000

 (c) 

150,500

122,000

 (d) 

1,671,000

80,500

 (e)
- average exercise price

(euro)

23.767

 

24.009

 

24.142

4.399

  

22.534

21.098

  

23.660

21.545

 
- average maturity in months 

55

 

55

 

56

54

  

65

48

  

56

48

 
Options granted during the period:                
- number of options                
- average exercise price

(euro)

               
- average maturity in months                
Options exercised at the end of the period:                
- number of options              

35,600

 (e)
- average exercise price

(euro)

             

17.519

 
- average market price at date of exercise

(euro)

             

22.264

 
Options expired during the period:                
- number of options 

360,930

 

40,280

 

64,925

    

14,700

 (d) 

233,995

8,900

 (e)
- average exercise price

(euro)

23.100

 

23.100

 

23.100

    

17.519

  

23.100

17.519

 
- average market price at date of exercise 

14.079

 

14.079

 

14.079

    

12.240

  

14.079

12.240

 
Options outstanding at the end of the period:                
- number of options 

2,226,570

 

223,720

 

315,075

150,500

 (c) 

150,500

107,300

 (d) 

1,437,005

36,000

 (e)
- average exercise price

(euro)

23.875

 

24.173

 

24.357

22.534

  

22.534

21.588

  

23.751

26.521

 
- average maturity in months 

45

 

46

 

46

53

  

65

36

  

46

43

 






(a)No. 8 managers.
(b)The assignment to the CEO have been integrated in 2007 by a monetary incentive to be paid after three-year in relation to the performance of Eni shares, equal to 80,500 options with a strike price of euro 27.451. Relating to the attribution of this incentive for 2006, equal to 96,000 options with a strike price of euro 23.100, the conditions for its payment were not fulfilled, since the price of Eni share resulted lower to the exercise-price at the end of the three-year vesting period.
(c)Options on Snam Rete Gas shares: assigned by the company to Domenico Dispenza who held the position of Chairman of Snam Rete Gas until December 23, 2005.
(d)Options on Saipem shares: assigned by the company to Angelo Caridi who held the position of CEO of Snamprogetti until August 2, 2007.
(e)Options on Saipem shares.

138


Board Practices

Eni’sCorporate Governance

The corporate governance structure of Eni SpA follows the Italian traditional model, defined by the Italian Civil Code and the Eni’s Corporate Governance Code (adopted in line the provisions of the Borsa Italiana Corporate Governance Code) with managerial functions entrustedwhich assigns corporate management to the Board of Directors, as the central bodylinchpin of the corporate governanceorganizational system, for the purpose of achieving the Company’s purpose.

Monitoringsupervisory functions are entrusted to the Board of Statutory Auditors while accounting control and auditing of the accounts to the audit of the financial statements is entrusted to external auditorsfirm appointed by the Shareholders’ Meeting.

According toThe names of Eni’s By-laws,Directors, their positions, the year when each was initially appointed as a Director and their ages are reported in the related table above.

The Board of Directors delegates specific powers towill expire at the CEO who is responsible for the managementdate of the Company, with the exception of those powers that cannot be delegated according with current legislation and of those retained exclusively by the Board of Directors on the matter regarding major strategic, operational and organizational decisions. Furthermore, the Board of Director has delegated the Chairman powers for researching and promoting integrated projects and strategic international agreements.

Eni’s governance model, therefore, states a clear separation between the role of the Chairman, and that of the CEO. According to Article 25 of Eni’s By-laws, the Chairman and the CEO represent the Company. In accordance with Article 27 of Eni’s By-laws, the Chairman also chairs the Shareholders’ Meeting calls and chairs meetings of the approving Eni’s 2010 financial statements.

Board of DirectorsDirectors’ duties and controls the application of decisions made by the Board. responsibilities

The Board of Directors has also establishedthe widest powers for the ordinary and extraordinary administration of the Company in relation to its purpose. The Board has entrusted CEO and Chief Operating Officer, Paolo Scaroni, with the widest powers for the ordinary and extraordinary administration of the Company and has retained the most important strategic, operational and organizational powers as well as the powers that by law may not be delegated.

In performing the powers as specified in the Eni Code, and in consultation with the relevant committees, the CEO, and/or the Chairman where applicable, the Board, among other tasks: defines the system of corporate governance of the Company and the Group; establishes the internal committees of the Board; assigns and revokes proxies to the CEO and to the Chairman and defines the limits and modalities for exercising such proxies; defines the fundamental guidelines pertaining to the organizational, administrative and accounting structure of the Company and the internal control system; examines and approves the Company and Group’s strategic, industrial and financial plans and agreements, annual budgets and the semi-annual financial report and the interim reports, as well as the Sustainability Report; receives information from Directors with consultingproxies relative to activities implemented during the exercising of proxies and advisory functions.receives periodical half-year information from the internal committees of the Board; assesses the general management trends of the Company and of the Group paying particular attention to conflicts of interest; examines and approves the operations of the Company and its subsidiaries which are significant from a strategic, economic and financial perspective, particularly with regards to situations in which one or more Directors retain personal or third party interests as well as related parties transactions; appoints and dismisses the Chief Operating Officer, the Officer in charge of preparing financial reports, the Officer in charge of internal control and a Senior Executive Vice President of Internal Audit; defines remuneration criteria for top management of the Company and the Group; resolves on the exercise of voting rights and on the appointment of members of corporate bodies of the primary subsidiaries; formulates the proposals to present to the Shareholders’ Meeting; and examines and resolves on other issues which Directors with proxies believe it is appropriate to present to the Board due to their particular relevance or sensitivity.

Directors’ independence

The Board of Directors also appointed three Chief Operating Officers responsible forhas confirmed that the three operational divisions of Eni SpAnon-executive Directors Clô, Colombo, Marchioni, Reboa, Resca, Scibetta and – in accordance with internationally-accepted principles of corporate governance – set up internal committees ofTaranto are independent. This determination was made by the Board with advisoryat its meeting on February 11, 2010 on the basis of statements made and consultative powers.

Duties and Responsibilities

A review of the Board’s power is represented below. The following duties and responsibilities are in addition to those that cannot be delegated under applicable laws.

1.Establishes the Company and Group Corporate Governance system and rules. In particular, after consulting the Internal Control Committee, the Board approves the rules that ensure the substantial and procedural transparency and correctness of the transactions carried out with related parties and those in which a Director holds an interest, on his behalf or on behalf of third parties. The Board adopts a procedure for the management and disclosure to third parties of documents and information concerning the Company, having special regard to price sensitive information.
2.Establishes among its members one or more committees with advisory and consulting tasks, appoints their members, establishes their responsibilities, determines their compensation and approves their regulations.
3.Confers and revokes the powers of the CEO and the Chairman; establishes terms, limits and operating methods of the exercise of such powers and determines the compensation related to the powers, on the basis of proposals from the Compensation Committee and after consulting the Board of Statutory Auditors. The Board may issue instructions to the CEO and the Chairman and reserve to itself any operations that pertain to its powers.
4.Establishes the guidelines of the organizational, administrative and accounting structure of the parent Company, including the internal control system, the main subsidiaries and the Group; evaluates the adequacy of the organizational, administrative and accounting structure designed by the CEO in particular with regard to the management of conflicts of interest.
5.Establishes, in particular, based on the recommendations of the Internal Control Committee, the guidelines of the internal control system, in order to ensure the identification, measurement, management and monitoring of the main risks faced by the Company and its subsidiaries. It evaluates adequacy, effectiveness and effective functioning of the internal control system managed by the Chief Executive Officer on an annual basis.
6.Establishes, based on the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer, Company and Group strategic guidelines and targets, including Sustainability policies. It reviews and approves the Company’s and Group’s strategic, operational and financial plans and the strategic agreements to be entered into by the Company. It examines and approves the Company’s non-profit activities plan and approves unplanned expenditures that amount to more than euro 500,000.
7.Examines and approves annual budgets for Eni’s Divisions and the Company, as well as the Group’s consolidated budget.

122


8.Examines and approves the Company’s and Group’s interim financial report and quarterly consolidates accounts, as per current regulations. Examines and approves the sustainability report, submitted also to the Shareholders’ Meeting.
9.Receives from Board members with delegated powers, at every Board meeting or at least every two months, reports informing the Board of activities carried out in exercising the delegated powers as well as updates on activities carried out by the Group and on atypical or unusual transactions or transactions with related parties that were not previously submitted to the evaluation and approval of the Board. In particular,
it receives a half-year report on the changes of approved capital projects indicated under 12 (b) and 12 (c) below on the basis of criteria defined by the Board itself.
10.Receives half-year updates on the Board Committees’ activities.
11.Evaluates the general performance of the Company and the Group, on the basis of information received from Board members with delegated powers, with particular attention to situations of conflicts of interest and compares results achieved as contained in the annual report and interim and quarterly reports, with the budget.
12.Evaluates and approves any transaction executed by the Company and its subsidiaries that have a significant impact on the company’s results of operations and liquidity. Particular attention is paid to situations in which Board members hold an interest on their own behalf or on behalf of third parties, and to related parties transactions. The Board ensures the principle of not interfering in the decision making process of the Group listed subsidiaries and subsidiaries subject to unbundling regulation. It also ensures the confidentiality of trade relations between said subsidiaries and Eni or third parties for the protection of the subsidiaries’ interests. Transactions with a significant impact on the Company’s results of operations and liquidity include the following:
(a)acquisition and disposal of investments, businesses and individual properties, contributions in kind, business combinations, mergers and de-mergers, winding-up of businesses, in each case exceeding euro 100 million, notwithstanding Article 23.2 of the By-laws;
(b)capital expenditures exceeding euro 300 million, or less if of particular strategic importance or particularly risky;
(c)any exploration initiatives and portfolio operations in the E&P sector in new areas;
(d)sale and purchase contracts relating to goods and services other than capital goods, for an amount exceeding euro 1 billion or a duration exceeding twenty years or gas supply contracts for at least 3 billion cubic meter per year for a ten-year term;
(e)financing to entities other than subsidiaries: (i) for amounts exceeding euro 200 million, if the amount is proportionate to the interest held or, (ii) in any case, if in favor of non-related companies or the amount is not proportionate to the interest held; and
(f)issuing by the Company of personal and real guarantees to entities other than subsidiaries: (i) for amounts exceeding euro 200 million, if in the interest of the Company or of Eni subsidiaries, or associates, as long as the guarantee is proportionate to the interest held or, (ii) in any case, if the guarantees are issued in the interest of associates and the amount is not proportionate to the interest held. In order to issue the guarantees indicated in section (i) of letter f), if the amount ranges between euro 100 million and euro 200 million, the Board confers powers to the CEO and the Chairman, to be exercised jointly in case of urgency.
13.Appoints and revokes, on recommendation of the CEO and in agreement with the Chairman, the General Managers of Divisions and attributes powers to them. In case of the Chief Executive Officer’s appointment as General Manager, the Chairman makes the proposal.
14.Appoints and revokes, on recommendation of the CEO and in agreement with the Chairman, and with the approval of the Board of Statutory Auditors, the Manager charged with preparing the Company’s financial reports as per Legislative Decree No. 58/1998. Moreover the Board of Directors verifies the adequacy of his powers and resources in order to fulfill this task and the observance of relevant administrative and accounting procedures prepared by him.
15.Appoints and revokes, on recommendation of the CEO and in agreement with the Chairman, after consulting the Internal Control Committee, the person in charge of internal control and the Internal Audit Manager, determining his/her compensation in line with the Company’s remuneration policies, and approves the guidelines set for those activities.
16.Ensures a person is identified as responsible for handling the relationships with the Shareholders.
17.Establishes, on the basis of the proposals received from the Compensation Committee, the criteria for top management compensation and implements the stock incentive plans approved by the Shareholders’ Meeting.
18.Examines and decides on proposals submitted by the CEO with respect to voting powers and to the appointment of members of the management and control bodies of the main subsidiaries. With specific regard to the shareholders’ meetings of listed companies of the Eni’s Group, the Board ensures the observance of the Corporate Governance Rules regarding the Shareholders’ Meetings.
19.Prepares the proposals to be submitted to the Shareholders’ Meeting.
20.Examines and resolves on other matters that the CEO deems appropriate to submit to the Board because of their importance and sensitivity.

123


Pursuant to Article 23.2 of the By-laws, the Board resolves on: mergers by incorporation and proportional demergers of at least 90% of directly owned subsidiaries; establishment and winding up of branches; amendmentsinformation available to the By-lawsCompany, and taking into account the criteria of independence set forth in order to comply with applicable legislation.

During the fiscal year the Board can approve the distribution of interim dividends to shareholders, as per Article 29.3 of Eni’s By-laws.

In its meeting of June 11, 2008, the Board of Directors approved internal rules for the callingItalian regulation and functioning of its meetings.

In 2008, the Board of Directors met 19 times (of which 15 ordinary meetings and 4 extraordinary meetings) for an average duration of 2 hours and 40 minutes. The average attendance rate to Board meetings was 98.66%, the attendance rate of independent non-executive Board members was 98.54%. The attendance rate for the Board currently in office was 98% both for the delegated Director and the independent delegated Director. The Eni Corporate Governance Code (the Eni Code) provides that independent Directors may hold meetings attended exclusively by non-executive independent members. This power was exercised in the meeting of February 22, 2009.

The market is informed, with advance notice normally before the closing of the year, of the dates of meetings convened for the approval or review of annual, semi-annual, full-year preliminary accounts and quarterly accounts, as well as resolution and proposal of interim dividends and final dividends, and related ex-dividend and payment dates. The financial calendar is available on Eni’s website.

In line with international best practices and as provided for by the Eni Code and the Borsa Italiana Code, the Board of Directors performs its self assessment ("Board review") of size, composition and functioning and of the activities of the Board and Board committees, with the support of a specialized consulting firm.

Appointment

See "Item 10 – Limitations on Voting and Shareholdings – Minority protection provisions".

Directors’ independence and integrity requirements

Legislative Decree No. 58 of February 24, 1998 (TUF), as amended by Legislative Decree No. 303 of December 29, 2006 states that at least one member, or two members if the Board is composed by more than seven members must possess the independence requirements provided for Statutory Auditors of listed companies, as per Article 148, paragraph 3, of same rule.

Article 17.3 of Eni’s By-laws states that at least one member, if the Board is made up by up to five members, or three Board members, in case the Board is made up by more than five members, shall have those independence requirements. This rule actually increases the number of independent Directors in Eni’s Board, as compared to what is required by the law. In addition Eni’s By-laws provide for a mechanism that supports Eni’s voting system by ensuring in any case the presence of the minimum number of independent directors in the Board. Eni’s Code contemplates further independence requirements, in line with those provided by the Corporate Governance Code promoted byof Borsa Italiana.

The TUF, Director Clô was confirmed as implemented in Article 17.3being independent under the terms of Eni’s By-laws, provides that the persons acting as Directors and Chief Operating Officers of listed companies shall possess the integrity requirements prescribed to members of control entities of listed companies. Directors must comply with additional specific requirements.

In accordance with Article 17.3 of Eni’s By-laws, the Board periodically evaluates independence and integrity of Directors and the absence of reasons for ineligibility and incompatibility. The Eni Code also providesas well, even though he has held the position for over nine years, because he was appointed by the minority shareholders (specifically the institutional investors) and because of his recognized professional skills and independence of judgment.

The Board of Statutory Auditors to verifyhas consistently verified, most recently at its meeting on February 11, 2010, the propercorrect application of the criteria and procedures adopted by the Board to evaluatefor assessing the independence of its members.

In accordance with Article 17.3 of Eni’s By-laws, should The above-referenced independence criteria may not be equivalent to the independence and integrity requirements be impaired or cease or should other reasons of ineligibility arise, the Board declares the termination of office of the member lacking said requirements and provides for his substitution or, alternatively, allows any impaired director to eliminate any reasons for incompatibility within a fixed deadline. Board members are expected to inform the Company if they lose their independence and integrity requirements or of any reasons for ineligibility or incompatibility that might arise.

On February 26, 2009 as part of the periodic assessment of each Board member’s requirements providedcriteria set forth by the law and Eni’s By-laws, theNYSE listing standards applicable to a U.S. domestic company.

Board Committees

The Board of Directors has verified that all its members possess the integrity requirement, on the basis of individual statements received. In addition, the Board has declared seven out of its nine members as independent, in accordance with applicable laws, Eni’s By-laws and the Eni Code, with specific reference to non

124


executive directors: Alberto Clô, Paolo Andrea Colombo, Paolo Marchioni, Marco Reboa, Mario Resca, Pierliugi Scibetta and Francesco Taranto.

The Board of Statutory Auditors verified in its meeting of March 3, 2009, the proper application of criteria and procedures adopted by the Board to evaluate the independence of its members.

Admissible positions in other companies

In its meeting of June 11, 2008, the Board of Directors expressed its opinion on the matter of the admissible number of positions held by Directors in other companies, as required by the Eni Code, confirming the opinion of the preceding Board, as follows:

an executive director should not hold: (i) the position of executive director in any other Italian or foreign listed company, or in any finance, banking or insurance company or any company with a net equity exceeding euro 10 billion; and (ii) the position of non-executive director or statutory auditor (or member of any other advisory committee) in more than three of said companies; and
a non-executive director, should not hold further positions than the one held in Eni, as: (i) executive director in more than one of the companies mentioned above and non-executive director or statutory auditor (or member of any other control body) in more than three of the mentioned companies, or as (ii) non-executive director or statutory auditor in more than six of the mentioned companies.

All the positions held in Eni’s subsidiaries are excluded for the purposes described above.

In case a director exceeds said limits in terms of positions held, he should timely inform the Board, who shall judge the situation taking into account the interest of the Company and call upon the interested director to make a decision on the matter. In any case, before accepting the office of director or statutory auditor (or member of any other control entity) of a company not related to Eni, the executive director informs the Board of Directors that evaluates its compatibility with his office at Eni and the interests of Eni. This rule applies also to the Chief Operating Officers of Eni’s divisions.

The Board’s resolution on this matter is published on Eni’s website in the Corporate Governance section.

On the basis of available information, at the Board’s meeting of February 26, 2009, the Board of Directors verified that the number of positions held in other companies by each Board member complies with the above mentioned limits.

Transaction in which a director has an interest and related parties transactions

As requested by the Eni Code, in accordance with the Borsa Italiana Code, the Board of Directors, with the opinion of Internal Control Committee, has adopted on February 12, 2009, the internal guidelines on transactions in which a Director (or a Statutory Audit) has an interest and on transactions with related parties4, with the aim to ensure the observance of transparency and fairness principles requested by the applicable laws and regulations for the above mentioned transactions.

In particular in its guidelines the Board:

identified, based on predetermined criteria, main transactions with related parties ("relevant transactions"), as such reserved to its sole responsibility;
reserved a special role to independent directors, by engaging the Internal Control Committee in the assessment and decision making process of these transactions. The Committee plays also a relevant role in transactions that are not reserved to the Board; and
strengthened an in-depth process of review and assessment of all transactions with related parties, irrespective of allocation of decision-making powers, in order to guarantee transparency and substantial and procedural fairness. The same kind of transparency must be observed also in the subsequent decision making process.

Therefore, these guidelines define Eni’s Group policy on these matters (for detailed information on 2008 operations, see "Item 7.B – Related party transactions").

As provided for by the Eni Code, these guidelines also regulate the transactions in which a Director and Statutory Auditor has an interest, providing, in particular that:

Eni’s directors and statutory auditors shall disclose periodically any personal interest with respect to the parent company in Eni and its subsidiaries and shall timely inform the Board of Directors and the Board of Statutory Auditors on transactions in which they have an interest that may be irrelevant to the Company’s purposes;


(4)iUntil the approval of said guidelines, relevant transactions with related parties (excluding standard ones) – as identified according to IAS 24 and according to the specific internal financial reporting regulation of July 4, 2006 and of December 20, 2007 – have been submitted to the Board of Directors, even if their amount was lower than the threshold defined for its competence.

125


directors who disclosed above mentioned interests should usually not take part in discussions and decisions on such transactions, also leaving the meeting when the decision is made; and
in any case, all transactions in which a director or a statutory auditor has an interest are considered material to the Company and are subject to the strengthened review process with express opinion of the Internal Control Committee.

Board Committees

The Board has instituted, as provided for by the Eni Code,established three internal committees with consulting and advisory and consulting tasks: (a)functions: a) the Internal Control Committee, (b)Committee; b) the Compensation CommitteeCommittee; and (c)c) the Oil-Gas Energy Committee. TheirThe Internal Control Committee and the Compensation Committee are required by the Corporate Governance Code of Borsa

139


Italiana. The composition, tasks and functioningoperation of the committees are definedgoverned by the Board of Directors,in accord with specific regulations and in respect ofcompliance with the criteria established byoutlined in the Eni Code.

The committees providedrequired by the Eni Code (the Internal Control Committee and the Compensation Committee) are made upconsist of at least three members, and in no case by aalthough the number higher thanof members must not exceed the majority of Board members.members of the Board. All the committees must be composed exclusivelyconsist of non executive directors,non-executive Directors, the majority of whom aremust be independent.

In its meetingperforming their functions, the committees retain the right to access any information and Company departments that are necessary to carry out their tasks. They are also provided with adequate financial resources and retain the right to avail themselves of June 11, 2008,external consultants according to terms established by the Board appointed the following non executive directors, all of them independent, as membersDirectors. Meetings of the Committees:

Internal Control Committee: Marco Reboa (Chairman) Paolo Marchioni, Pierluigi Scibetta and Francesco Taranto.
Compensation Committee: Mario Resca (Chairman), Alberto Clô, Paolo Andrea Colombo and Francesco Taranto.
Oil-Gas Energy Committee: Alberto Clô (Chairman), Paolo Andrea Colombo, Marco Reboa, Mario Resca and Pierluigi Scibetta.

Internal Control Committee

The Internal Control Committee was established in Eni in 1994 and is entrustedcommittees may also be attended by non-members expressly invited to attend with advisory and consulting tasks in respect of the Board in the matter of internal control system. It is composed exclusively of independent directors, provided with the professional qualification required by the Eni Code5 and reportsreference to the Board at least every six months at the date of the approval of the annual and semi-annual financial statementsindividual items on the activity performed as well as on the adequacymeeting agenda. Meetings of the internal control system.
The Committee performs the following main tasks:

assesses in conjunction with the Manager charged with preparing financial reports and the External Auditors the proper use of accounting principles and their homogeneity for the preparation of the consolidated financial statements;
on request of the CEO, expresses opinions on specific aspects concerning identification of main Company risks and designing, implementing and managing the internal control system;
monitors the activities of the internal audit function and therefore examines the integrated audit plan, the annual budget, the periodical Internal Audit reports on activities performed and their outcomes;
in order to express its opinion on the adequacy of the internal control system, assesses: (i) the outcomes of internal audit reports and the evidence deriving from monitoring activities on improvement actions on control systems planned after the audits are performed; (ii) evidence resulting from periodic reports on monitoring activities on the Company’s internal control system over financial reporting; (iii) reports from the Board of Statutory Auditors and individual Statutory Auditors also for what concerns investigation activities performed by the internal control department on whistleblowing, also in anonymous form; (iv) evidence from reports and management letters of External Auditors6; (v) reports of the Watch Structure also in its capacity of Guarantor of the Code of Ethics; (vi) evidence from reports of the Manager charged with preparing financial reports and of the Manager responsible for internal audit; and (vii) as well as review and investigations from third parties; and
performs any other task attribute to it by the Board of Directors, in particular expresses an opinion on the internal guidelines for the substantial and procedural correctness of transactions with related parties, playing a relevant role in the analysis and in the final decision process of said transactions, as well as those where a director has an interest of his or third parties behalf.

In 2008, the Internal Control Committee convened 18 times, with an average attendance rate of 92%, and reviewed the following items: (i) the 2007 audit activities report and the 2008 audit plan and its periodic progress; (ii) the 2007 audit activities report and 2008 audit plan preparedare attended by the internal audit functionsChairman of Saipem and Stogit functions; (iii) outcomesthe Board of planned and unplanned Eni’s internal audit activities, as well as results of monitoring activities on progresses madeStatutory Auditors or an Effective Auditor appointed by operating units in implementing planned remedial actions in order to eliminate


(5)iUnlike the Code of Borsa Italiana, the Eni Code requires that at least two (and not only one) Board members have adequate expertise in accounting and financial matters.
(6)iEni entrusted to the Board of Statutory Auditors the role of Audit Committee under the SOA and therefore of assessing the proposals of external auditors and the monitoring of their activity.

126


deficiencies highlighted by internal audit activities with special attention to specific issues; (iv) outcomes from Eni’s internal auditing interventions as specifically required by Eni’s control bodies; (v) the periodic reports concerning complaints collected; (vi) the report on Eni’s internal control system preparedhim. Committee meetings are summarized by the Manager delegated for the internal control and the compliance with the independence requirements of this Manager; (vii) the future role, tasks and responsibilitiesrespective Secretaries. The current members of the Manager delegated for the internal controlcommittees are all non-executive and independent directors; they were appointed at a meeting of Eni’s Internal Audit function and the guidelines approved by the Board of Directors concerning internal audit activities; (viii) updating of the Eni’s Internal Audit operating handbook; (ix) disclosures of information or notification regarding certain inquiries conducted by both Italian or foreign judicial and administrative authorities with reference to crimes or other kind of infringements which involve Eni and all its subsidiaries, in Italy or abroad, and their directors and employees; (x) disclosuresheld on the development of pending litigation; (xi) the essential features of the 2007 Eni’s financial statements, on a consolidated and individual basis, through meetings with top level representatives of Eni’s and its subsidiaries’ administrative functions, and with Chairmen (or others members) of Boards of Statutory auditors and responsible partners from independent audit companies for each subsidiary; accounting treatment adopted for specific transactions; the draft 2008 interim consolidated report prepared on the basis of the EU transparency directive and relevant opinion of external auditors confirming the compliance of this report with IAS 34; (xii) procedures and systems used for evaluating, classifying and reporting hydrocarbon reserves; (xiii) the essential features of Eni’s Annual Report on Form 20-F, progress on implementation of SOA activities and updating on programs and controls for 2008 to prevent and detect frauds; (xiv) the report on the administrative and accounting setup of the Manager responsible for the preparation of the Company’s financial report and the report on the internal control system over financial reporting; (xv) the implementation plan regarding Article 36 of Consob Decision No. 16191/2007; (xvi) the report on the internal control system, that was included in the Corporate Governance section of the 2007 Annual Report; (xvii) guidelines on financial statements auditing, the report on audit reports for 2007 prepared by external auditors, auditing strategies for 2007 and 2008; (xviii) updating of Eni’s Model 231 and the periodic report presented on activities performed by the Company Watch Structure, also by meetings with its members as provided for the new version of Model 231 (the Company’s internal control structure) approved by Eni’s Board of Directors in March 2008; (xix) update on Eni’s guideline for management and control of financial risk; (xx) information on Circular No. 330 of October 14, 2008 concerning Group’s procedures for the procurement of works, goods and services; the main aspects of a Company’s project of process reengineering (BPR) concerning group procurement and updating of the procedures for reviewing suppliers selection following detection of illegal behaviors; (xxi) periodic report in the procedure for the ascertainment of alleged illicit behavior on the part of Eni employees, as per Circular No. 301 of December 14, 2007; (xxii) information of Circular No. 305 of December 20, 2007 concerning dissemination and reception of laws and regulations; (xxiii) review of the draft report of directors under Article 2433-bis of the Civil Code on interim dividends for 2008; (xxiv) information on the development plan of Eni Trading & Shipping activities; and (xxv) logical-operational flows of Eni communication activities.June 11, 2008.

Compensation Committee

The Committee is entrustedMembers: Mario Resca (Chairman), Francesco Taranto, Alberto Clô and Paolo Andrea Colombo.

Established by the Board of Directors in 1996, this committee advises the Board regarding the remuneration payable to Directors with proposing tasks onproxies and to the matters of compensationmembers of the Chairmancommittees of Directors set up by the Board and, on instructions from the CEO, as well as the Board Committees members,regarding: (i) Annual and examining the indication of the CEO, on the following: (i) long-term incentive plans including stock-based compensation;plans; (ii) general criteria for the compensationremuneration of the managersexecutives with strategic responsibilities; and (iii) the setting of objectives and the assessment of results of performancethe Performance and incentive plans.Incentive Plans.

In 2008,During 2009, the Compensation Committee met 413 times, with a 100%96% attendance rate, and accomplished the following:made proposals regarding: (i) examined the 2007Eni’s 2008 results and the2009 objectives for 2008 in viewthe purposes of defining annualthe Annual and long-term incentives;Long-Term Incentive Plans; (ii) reviewed the bonusesvariable remuneration of the Chairman, CEO and CEODirectors based on 2007 performance;the results achieved in 2008; (iii) reviewed the benchmarks for the managers with strategic responsibilities remuneration and the criteria of the annual remuneration policy;policy for executives with strategic responsibilities; (iv) remuneration and rules applying toestablishment of the 2009 Long-Term Monetary Incentive Plan for the CEO, to replace and General Manager Paolo Scaroni and remunerationcompensate for the powers delegatedEni Stock Option Plan; (v) establishment of the 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan, to replace the Chairman;Stock Option Plan, for critical managerial resources; (vi) establishment of the 2009-2011 Deferred Monetary Incentive Plan for managerial resources; and (v) the(vii) 2009 implementation of the long-term incentive plans for the year 2008Deferred Monetary Incentive Plan and relevant grantsits assignment to the CEO.

The composition, appointment and operating methods, tasks, powers and resources of the Committee are governed by an appropriate regulation approved by the Board of Directors.

Internal Control Committee

Members: Marco Reboa (Chairman), Francesco Taranto, Pierluigi Scibetta and Paolo Marchioni.

The Internal Control Committee, established within Eni in 1994, provides consulting and advisory services to the Board of Directors regarding the internal control system. It is exclusively comprised of non-executive, independent Directors with the professional qualifications required to carry out the responsibilities entrusted to it11. The Committee reports to the Board of Directors both on its activities and on the adequacy of the internal control system, at least once every six months, at the time of approval of the annual and half-year financial statements. The periodical reports, to be submitted to the Board of Directors, are prepared by the Committee and must take into consideration the content of the periodical reports prepared by the Officer in charge of preparing financial reports, the Officer in charge of Internal Control and the Eni 231 Watch Structure and, in general, must be based on the evidence acquired while performing its activities. The Committee’s activities:

in cooperation with the Officer in charge of preparing financial reports and the Audit firm, assesses and examines the correct utilization of accounting principles and their consistent application for the drafting of the annual and half-year financial statements before approval by the Board of Directors;
assists the Board in defining the guidelines for the internal control system;
upon request by the CEO, provides an evaluation on specific aspects concerning the process used to identify the main risks related to the Company as well as on the planning, implementation and management of the internal control system;
oversees the activities of Internal Audit and of the Officer in charge of Internal Control; as part of this responsibility the Committee also examines: the proposal of the Audit Plan and its potential amendments


(11)Unlike to the Code of Borsa Italiana, the Eni Code requires that at least two (and not only one) Committee members have adequate expertise in accounting and financial matters, to be assessed by the Board of Directors at the time of their appointment.

140


during the financial year; the annual budget of the Internal Audit Department; the periodical reports and performance indicators on the activities of the Internal Audit Department;
examines and assesses: (i) the outcomes of internal audit reports as well as any evidence on related monitoring activities on improvement actions on control system, planned after the audits are performed; (ii) evidence resulting from the periodical reports on the outcomes of the monitoring activities conducted on the internal control system over financial reporting, on its adequacy and actual application, as well as the adequacy of the powers and means assigned to the Officer in charge of preparing financial reports; (iii) communications and information received from the Board of Statutory Auditors and its members regarding the internal control system, also in reference to the outcomes of preliminary inquiries conducted by the Internal Audit department following reports received also in anonymous form (whistle blowing); (iv) evidence emerging from the reports and management letters submitted by the Audit Firm12; (v) periodical reports issued by Eni 231 Watch Structure, also in its capacity as Guarantor of the Code of Ethics; (vi) evidence emerging from the periodical reports submitted by the Officer in charge of preparing financial reports and by the Officer in Charge of internal control; and (vii) information on the internal control system as it relates to the Company’s structure, also through periodical meetings with management, as well as enquiries and reviews carried out by third; and
performs other specific activities aimed at formulating analyses and opinions on topics falling under its competence and based on the Board’s request for details, and in particular, providing an opinion on the rules concerning the transparency and substantial and procedural correctness of operations carried out with related third parties, as well as transactions where a Director of the Board retains a personal interest or an interest on behalf of third parties, and carries out any additional task assigned within this scope, including the review and evaluation of specific types of transactions.

Board of Statutory Auditors

In lineaccordance with Italian legislation, as specified in Article 28 of Eni’s By-laws,By-Laws, the Board of Statutory Auditors consists of five effective members (and two alternate) who must comply with specific expertise and integrity requirements.

The following table sets forth the names, positions and year of appointment of the members of the Board of Statutory Auditors were elected by the Ordinary Shareholders’ Meeting held on June 10, 2008 for a three year term, until the Shareholders’ Meeting approval of the consolidated financial statements for the year ended at December 31, 2010.

127


Name Position 

Year first appointed to Board
of Statutory Auditors


 
 
Ugo Marinelli Chairman 

2008

Roberto Ferranti Auditor 

2008

Luigi Mandolesi Auditor 

2008

Tiziano Onesti Auditor 

2008

Giorgio Silva Auditor 

1999

Francesco Bilotti Alternate Auditor 

2005

Pietro Alberico Mazzola Alternate Auditor 

2005


 
 

Roberto Ferranti, Luigi Mandolesi, Tiziano Onesti and Francesco Bilotti were candidates in the list presented by the Ministry of Economy and Finance; Ugo Marinelli, Giorgio Silva and Pietro Alberico Mazzola were candidates in the list presented by institutional investors coordinated by institutional investors.

Tasks

ThePursuant to the Consolidated Law on Finance, the Board of Statutory Auditors in accordance with the TUF provisions, monitors:oversees: (i) the compliance with the lawslaw and with Eni’s By-laws;the By-Laws; (ii) the observance of the principles offor correct administration; (iii)administration, the adequacysuitability of the Company’s organizational structure, for matters within each area of competence, the scope of its authority,suitability of the internal control system and of the administrative and accountingadministrative-accounting system, as well as the reliabilityaccurate recording by the latter of the latter in fairly representingCompany’s operations; (iii) the Company’s transactions; (iv) the actual implementation ofmethods for complying with corporate governance rules foreseen byregulations set forth in the Code of Borsa Italiana Code to which the Company adheres; and (v)(iv) the adequacy of instructions conveyedthe provisions imposed on the subsidiaries by the Company, in order to its subsidiaries to ensure fulfillment ofguarantee full compliance with legal reporting obligations provided by applicable laws.requirements.

Moreover, accordingPursuant to the TUF and the Eni Code,Consolidated Law on Finance, the Board of Statutory Auditors oversight the appointment, retention and work of the Company’s principal external auditors: to this extent the Board of Statutory Audit (i) submitsubmits a documented proposal to the Shareholders’ Meeting called for its approval, a motivated proposalconcerning the granting of auditing responsibilities as well as compensation for the appointment ofaudit firm. In accordance with Eni’s Code, the principal external auditors and for their fees and (ii)Board also monitors the independence of the principal external auditors, verifying both theaudit firm, its compliance with theall applicable regulatory provisions of applicable laws and regulations governing the matter, andas well as the nature and extentsize of services other than the auditnon-auditing services provided


(12)Eni entrusted to the Board of Statutory Auditors, as set forth in the Code of Borsa Italiana, the role of Audit Committee under the SOA and therefore the task of reviewing the proposals submitted by Audit Firm in order to obtain the auditing mandate and monitor the efficacy of the accounting auditing process.

141


to the Eni Group either directly or through companies (also through entities belongingwithin its network. The outcomes of this monitoring activity are included in the Report which shall be prepared pursuant to Article 153 of the Consolidated Law on Finance, and attached to the auditors’ network).documentation accompanying the financial statements.

As provided for Article 23.3In 2005, the Board of Eni’s By-laws,Directors, as permitted by the rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission applicable to foreign issuers listed on the regulated U.S. markets, identified the Board of Statutory Auditors is timely informed, at least on a quarterly basis, by the Board of Directors, on the activities and on the most relevant operations regarding the operational, economic and financial management of the Company and of its subsidiaries.

Statutory Auditors are required to attend the Shareholders’ Meeting and the meetings of the Board of Directors and must promptly notify Consob, the publicAuthority responsible for regulating the Italian securities market of irregularities found in the performance of their oversight activity.

In 2008, the Board of Statutory Auditors met 22 times. Average duration of meetings was 3 hours and 30 minutes. In 2008 attendance rate was 95% of its members and 93% at Board of Directors’ meetings. The current Board showed attendance rate of 98.4% of members in its own meetings and 92.8% at Board of Directors’ meetings.

Board of Statutory Auditors as Audit Committee

The Board of Directors, in its meeting of March 22, 2005, in accordance with the provision of the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) for non-U.S. private issuers (SEC rule 10A-3), identified in the Board of Statutory Auditors the body that, meeting the requirements provided for the above mentioned rule, starting fromsince June 1, 2005, performs, tohas been fulfilling, within the extent permittedlimits set forth by Italian legal or listing requirements,laws, the functionsresponsibilities assigned by SEC rules and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOA) to the Audit Committee of U.S. registrant.

such foreign issuers by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and by SEC regulations. On June 15, 2005, the Board of Statutory Auditors approved its chart for carrying out the tasks attributedregulations concerning the fulfillment of the responsibilities assigned pursuant to the audit committee under mentionedaforementioned U.S. laws and regulations,7. This charter the text of which is publishedavailable on Eni’s website.

The key functions performed by the Board of Statutory Auditors acting as an audit committee as provided for by SEC rules are as follows:

evaluating the proposals presented by the external auditors for their appointment and making its promted recommendation to the Shareholders’ Meeting about the proposal for the appointment or the retention of the external auditor;


(7) The chart was amended on March 30, 2007, taking into account changes introduced by Legislative Decree No. 303 of 2006 on Article 159, paragraph 1 of TUF, andevaluating the proposals presented by the Eni’s Code, as well as to take into account the variations adopted inthe organization structure, in respectexternal auditors for their appointment and making its prompt recommendation to the one existing on June 15, 2005, whenShareholders’ Meeting about the previous chart was approved.proposal for the appointment or the retention of the external auditor;

128


 performing the activities of oversight of the work of the external auditor engaged for the audit or performing other audit, review or attest services;
 making recommendations to the Board of Directors on the resolution of disagreements between management and the auditor regarding financial reporting;
 approving the procedures for: (a) the receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints received by the Company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters; and (b) the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of the Company of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters;
 approving the procedures for the pre-approval of admissible non-audit services, analytically identified, and examine the information on the execution of the authorized services;
 evaluating any request to have recourse to the external auditor engaged for the audit for admissible non audit services and expresses its opinion to the Board of Directors;
 examining the periodical communications from the external auditor relating to: (a) all critical accounting policies and practices to be used; (b) all alternative treatments of financial information within generally accepted accounting principles that have been discussed with management officials of the Company, ramifications of the use of such alternative disclosures and treatments, and the treatment preferred by the external auditor; and (c) other material written communication between the external auditor and the management;
examining complaints received by the CEO and the CFO concerning any significant deficiency in the design or operation of internal controls which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information and any material weakness in internal controls; and
examining complaints received by the CEO and the CFO concerning any fraud that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal controls.

Eni Watch Structure and Model 231

According to the Italian regulations pertaining to the "administrative liability of legal entities deriving from offences", pursuant to Legislative Decree No. 231 of June 8, 2001 (hereinafter, "Legislative Decree No. 231 of 2001"), associations, including corporations, may be held liable – and therefore charged with the payment of a penalty or placed under injunction, with regard to certain offences that are attempted or committed in Italy or abroad in the interest or for the benefit of the Company. The companies may, in any case, adopt organizational, management and control models suitable to the prevention of possible offences. With regards to this issue, Eni SpA’s Board of Directors – in its meetings of December 15, 2003 and January 28, 2004 – has approved an organizational, managerial and control model pursuant to Legislative Decree No. 231 of 2001 ("Model 231") and has appointed the Eni Watch Structure13. The composition of the Eni Watch Structure, initially consisting of only three members, was amended in 2007 with the addition of two external members, one of them appointed by the CEOChairman of the Eni Watch Structure and selected from among university professors and professionals of proven experience and expertise in economics and business management. The internal members are represented by the Legal Affairs Senior Executive Vice President, the Internal Audit Senior Executive Vice President and the CFO concerning any significant deficiency in the design or operationHuman Resources Executive Vice President (or managers directly reporting to them).


(13)The Eni Watch Structure is also the Guarantor of the Code of Ethics.

142


Court of internal controls which are reasonably likelyAuditors ("Corte dei conti")

The financial management of Eni is subject to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information and any material weakness in internal controls; and

examining complaints receivedcontrol by the CEO andCourt of Auditors in order to protect public finances. This activity was carried out by the CFO concerning any fraud that involves management or other employees who have a significant role inJudge of the Company’s internal controls.

Appointment, requirements and other duties

Like the Directors and in accordance with applicable regulations, the StatutoryCourt of Auditors, areLucio Todaro Marescotti, succeeded by Raffaele Squitieri, appointed by meansresolutions issued on October 28, 2009 by the Council of a list vote as provided for by Eni’s By-laws. At least two Auditors and one alternate are elected from lists presented by minorities and the ChairmanPresidency of the Court of Auditors. The Judge of the Court assists at the meetings of the Board of Directors, of the Board of Statutory Auditors shall be elected from a list other than the one obtaining the majority of votes (for a detailed descriptionand of the procedure, see "Item 10 – Minority protection provisions").Internal Control Committee.

Employees

As stressed in the Code, the Statutory Auditors shall act with autonomy and independence also towards the shareholders who elected them and, in accordance with the TUF, they shall possess the independence, expertise and integrity requirements prescribed byof December 31, 2009, Eni’s had a regulationtotal of the Minister78,417 employees, a decrease of Justice. As for the professional qualifications of the candidates, Article 28 of Eni’s By-laws, in line with the said Decree of the Minister of Justice, foresees that the professional requirements can also be acquired with at least three years of professional experience463 employees or by teaching business law, business administration and finance, as well as at least a three year experience in a managerial position in geological or engineering businesses. Eni’s Auditors are all chartered auditors.

Statutory Auditors declared consequently to possess independence, integrity and expertise requirements as foreseen by the applicable law. In compliance with the Eni Code prescriptions designed to ensure that auditors are independent subsequently to their appointment based also on the Code provisions for the same matter in the case of directors, the Board of Statutory Auditors in its meeting of January 21, 2009 verified that all its members possess such requirements (independence, integrity and expertise) and the Board of Directors in its meeting of February 26, 2009 verified this certification.

With reference to positions held in other companies, until coming into force of new Consob regulation on this matter, Eni’s By-laws prohibited the appointment as statutory auditor of persons that were already statutory auditors or members of the supervisory board or members of the management control committee of at least five companies in regulated markets other than listed subsidiaries of Eni SpA. In light of that, appointed Auditors communicated to the Company their positions in other entities and subsequently the Board of Statutory Auditors verified compliance with the said limit as provided by Eni’s By-laws. As of June 30, 2008, accordingly with the By-laws provisions, Statutory Auditors may assume positions in governing or controlling bodies in companies other than Eni within the limits set by the mentioned Consob regulation. In September 2008 Eni’s Statutory Auditors communicated to Consob their compliance with said limits.

External Auditors

As provided for by Italian law, the auditing of financial statements is entrusted to external auditors registered on the register held by Consob. The external auditor is appointed and its fee is determined by the Shareholders’ Meeting on reasoned proposal of the Board of Statutory Auditors.

Eni’s external auditor, PricewaterhouseCoopers SpA, was appointed for the first time on June 1, 2001 and was reappointed by the ordinary Shareholders’ Meeting on May 28, 2004, for a term of three financial years. The

129


Shareholders’ Meeting of May 24, 2007 resolved to renew the appointment for the 2007-2009 period in accordance with Legislative Decree No. 303/2006, as it did not yet complete the maximum nine financial year engagement allowed by the law.

At the end of this engagement, PricewaterhouseCoopers SpA will cease to act as Eni’s external auditors.

In 2008, Eni’s External Auditors met with Eni Statutory Auditors in order to discuss: (i) critical accounting policies and practices applied for the purpose of a proper representation of Eni’s results of operations and financial condition; (ii) alternative accounting treatments provided for by generally accepted accounting principles concerning material items discussed with management, including ramifications of the use of, the impact deriving0.6% from the application of said alternative disclosures and treatments and relevant information, as well as the treatments preferred by external auditors; and (iii) the contents of any other material written communication between external auditors, and management.

For a description of the special powers of the State, see "Item 10 – Memorandum and Articles of Association – Limitations on Voting and Shareholdings – Special Powers of the State" below.

Compensation

Board members’ emoluments are determined by the Shareholders’ Meeting, while the emoluments of the Chairman and CEO, in relation to the powers entrusted to them, are determined by the Board of Directors considering relevant proposals made by the Compensation Committee and after consultation with the Board of Statutory Auditors.

Main elements of the compensation of the Chairman, the CEO, other Board members and Eni’s three General Managers are described below.

CHAIRMAN
The compensation of the Chairman of the Board of Directors has been resolved by Eni’s Shareholders’ Meeting and includes:

(a)a base salary of euro 265,000 and reimbursement of out of pocket expenses; and
(b)a bonus which amount is determined in accordance with the performance of Eni shares in the reference year as compared with the performance of the seven largest international oil companies for market capitalization, taking account of the dividend paid. This bonus will amount to euro 80,000 or euro 40,000, depending on whether the performance of Eni shares is rated first or second, or third or fourth in the reference year, respectively. No bonus is paid in case Eni scores a position lower than the fourth one. In 2007, Eni rated seventh and in 2008 the bonus was not paid.

With regard to the powers delegated to the Chairman, the Board of Directors determined further compensation, as follows:

(a)an annual emolument of euro 500,000; and
(b)an annual performance bonus based on the achievements of the Company’s target determined in the same way as for the CEO (see below). In 2008, based on 2007 Eni’s results, a bonus equal to 115% of the target level was determined, within an interval ranging from 85% to 130% of said target level. The target level of the bonus is 60% of the annual emolument. In 2008, this bonus amounted to euro 345,000.

Compensation of the Chairman also includes an insurance against death or permanent inability caused by injury or sickness in the exercise of his duties or under certain other circumstances as stipulated collectively for all managers of Italian companies producing goods and services. In particular, a specific insurance policy has been underwritten which guarantees euro 500,000 to survivors.

CEO
Compensation for the CEO has been resolved by the Board of Directors of Eni in connection with his position both as CEO and as General Manager of the parent company Eni SpA.

As General Manager of Eni SpA, his terms of employment are regulated by the "Contratto collettivo nazionale di lavoro per i dirigenti di aziende produttrici di beni e servizi" (the Italian national collective contract for managers of companies producing goods and services), as well as by any internal agreement stipulated by the representatives of managers and Eni SpA.

The CEO compensation includes the following items:

(a)an annual fixed amount of euro 1,430,000, including a base salary of euro 1,000,000 for the services as General Manager and an emolument of euro 430,000 for the services as CEO;

130


(b)an annual performance bonus based on the achievement of the Company targets. These targets are approved by the Board of Directors on proposal of the Compensation Committee and defined consistently with the targets of the strategic plan and yearly budget. In 2007, said targets included a set level of cash flow from operations (with a 30% weight), divisional operating performances (30%), strategic projects (20%) and corporate efficiency (20%). Results achieved have been assessed assuming a constant trading environment and have been verified by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board of Directors. The target and maximum amount of this bonus corresponds respectively to 77% and 100% of the fixed amount under a) above. In 2008, based on 2007 Eni’s results, a bonus equal to 115% of the target level was determined, within an interval ranging from 85% to 130% and a bonus of euro 1,267,000 was paid;
(c)a long-term incentive under the incentive scheme as approved in March 2006 by the Board of Directors as proposed by the Compensation Committee. This incentive scheme provides: (i) a deferred monetary incentive, linked to the achievement of certain Company’s financial performance annual targets; and (ii) stock option awards linked to the achievement of certain performance targets of the Eni share measured in terms of total shareholder return that considers both the stock appreciation and the dividend (see below for a more detailed description of Eni’s long-term incentive schemes applicable to top and senior managers). Under this scheme the CEO received:
(i)an annual award of a deferred monetary bonus with a target level corresponding to 55% of the fixed amount under a) above. In 2008, this award amounted to euro 1,022,500 that will be paid after three years in connection with the achievement of certain preset Company annual targets in terms of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization); and
(ii)an annual award of stock options for 2008 for a face value corresponding to 10 times the fixed amounts under section a) above. In 2008, a total of 573,000 options were awarded with a vesting period of three years and an exercise price of euro 22.540 corresponding to the arithmetic average of official prices registered on the Mercato Telematico Azionario in the month preceding the award;
(d)severance payments as regulated by Italian laws, which consist of a lump sum to be paid to the employee upon retirement. To this end, the Company recognizes yearly accruals computed by dividing the total remuneration earned as General Manager (base salary, bonuses and stock compensation) by 13.5. The amounts accrued are revaluated yearly at a fixed rate of 1.5% plus the 75% of the yearly official consumer price index increase;
(e)as an integration to the severance payment described above, should the employment contract of Mr. Scaroni as General Manager of Eni SpA be terminated upon expiry of the term of his office as CEO or upon earlier termination of such office, he will be entitled to receive a payment of euro 3,200,000 plus an amount corresponding to the average performance bonus earned in the three-year period 2008-2010, in lieu of notice thus waiving both parties from any obligation related to notice. This amount will not be paid if the termination of office meets the requirement of due cause as per Article 2119 of the Italian Civil Code, in case of death and in case of resignation from office other than as the result of a reduction in the powers currently attributed to the CEO. Furthermore, upon expiry of the contract as employee of Eni, the CEO in his capacity as General Manager of the parent company is entitled to receive an indemnity that is accrued along the service period by taking into account social security contribution rates and post-retirement benefit computations applied to the CEO annual emolument and 50% of the maximum bonuses earned as a Director. Taking into account that the CEO has been appointed on June 11, 2008, a provision of euro 134,139.23 has accrued in 2008. A sum of euro 644,179.60 corresponding to the global amount accrued over the preceding three-year period of office was paid;
(f)competition clause: the CEO agrees not to be engaged, on his own account and directly, in any business that may be in competition with the businesses of Eni, as per its By-laws, in Italy, Europe and North America for a year after termination of office. Based on this arrangement, Eni will pay a fee corresponding to euro 2,219,000. As a consequence of any breach of this clause, the CEO would lose the right to such fee and reimburse any amount already paid, and shall pay to Eni damages in an amount agreed among the parties to correspond to twice such non-competition fee;
(g)the pension scheme corresponds to the scheme applied to Eni managers and provided by INPS (the Italian state social security entity) to all Italian workers. In addition, the CEO is included in an additional pension scheme under the form of an Eni Group pension fund agreed collectively by Eni and Eni managers which provides integration, in the form of a lump sum payment or perpetuity, to the pension paid by the State. This integration is proportional to contributions to the fund made by both the manager and the Company in equal amounts. The integration is awarded to the manager when eligible for the payment of the pension from the State, provided that a minimum time period has elapsed according to the Fund By-laws. An agreement signed on March 20, 2006, established that the Company’s and the manager’s payment to this Fund amounts to 3.5% of total emoluments earned by the CEO in his position as General Manager (i.e. the aggregate of the annual salary and bonuses up to a maximum of euro 200,000);
(h)like all other Eni managers, Mr. Scaroni is entitled to participate in a health insurance fund financed by Eni managers and Eni which provides reimbursement of certain medical expenses on the basis of rules and parameters as provided by the Fund’s By-laws; and
(i)insurance against death or permanent inability caused by injury or disease in the exercise of his duties or under certain other circumstances as stipulated collectively for all managers of Italian manufacturing

131


companies. In particular a specific insurance policy has been underwritten on behalf of Mr. Scaroni which guarantees euro 7.5 million to beneficiaries in case of death or disability, however determined.

MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The compensation of members of the Board of Directors has been determined by Eni’s Shareholders’ Meeting and includes:

(a)an annual emolument of euro 115,000 and reimbursement of out of pocket expenses; and
(b)a bonus determined in accordance with the performance of the Eni share in a given year as compared with the performance of the seven largest international oil companies for market capitalization, taking account of the dividend paid. Said bonus amounts to euro 20,000 or euro 10,000 depending on whether the performance of Eni shares is rated first or second, or third or fourth in the reference year, respectively. In 2007, Eni rated seventh and in 2008 the bonus was not paid.

The Board of Directors in the meeting of June 11, 2008, as proposed by the Compensation Committee and advised by the Board of Statutory Auditors, confirmed the additional element of remuneration for the Board members holding positions in Board’s committees, with the exclusion of the Chairman and CEO. Said fee amounts to euro 30,000, and euro 20,000 for the position of chairman of a committee and of member of a committee, respectively. This amount decreases to euro 27,000 and euro 18,000 in case a member holds positions in more than one committee.

GENERAL MANAGERS
The terms of employment of the General Managers of Eni’s Divisions are regulated by the "Contratto collettivo nazionale di lavoro per i dirigenti di aziende produttrici di beni e servizi" (the Italian national collective contract for managers of companies producing goods and services), as well as by any internal agreement stipulated by the representatives of managers and Eni SpA. The General Managers of Divisions may be appointed as members of the Board of Directors of Eni subsidiaries and affiliates; compensation deriving from such appointments as provided for by Article 2389 of the Italian Civil Code is to be repaid to Eni as it is included in their remuneration under section a) below.

Their remuneration includes:

(a)a base salary, defined considering the position held and their specific responsibilities, with reference to appropriate market levels as benchmarked against national and international companies of comparable size, complexity and scope in the oil and gas, industrial and service sectors. Base salaries are reviewed and adjusted on a yearly basis considering individual performance and career progression;
(b)a performance bonus paid yearly, based on the achievement of specific financial, operational and strategic targets and of individual performance goals pertaining to each business units defined consistently with the Company’s targets in the strategic plan and yearly budget. The target level of the bonus corresponds to 60% of the base salary;
(c)long-term incentives in the form of a deferred monetary bonus and stock options according to the same scheme as the CEO. Under this scheme the three General Managers have received:
(i)a yearly award of a deferred monetary bonus at target level of 40% of the base salary. In 2008, based on 2007 Eni results, the basic deferred bonus awarded was equal to 130% of the target level, within an interval ranging from 70% to 130%; and
(ii)a yearly award of stock options for a face value corresponding to 4.5 times the base salary. Options awarded in 2008 have a vesting period of three years and an exercise price of euro 22.540 corresponding to the arithmetic average of official prices registered on the Mercato Telematico Azionario in the month preceding the award;
(d)a severance payment as regulated by Italian laws, which consists of a lump sum to be paid to the employee upon retirement. To this end, the Company recognizes yearly accruals computed by dividing the yearly remuneration (base salary, bonuses and stock compensation) by 13.5. These amounts are revaluated yearly at the rate of 1.5% plus the 75% of the official yearly consumer price index increase;
(e)the pension scheme corresponds to the scheme applied to Eni managers and provided by INPS to all Italian workers. In addition, the General Managers are included in the additional pension scheme of Eni managers which provides an integration to the public pension. For further details see section g) of the description of compensation of the CEO;
(f)like all other Eni managers, they are entitled to participate in a health insurance Fund financed by Eni managers and Eni which provides reimbursement of certain medical expenses on the basis of rules and parameters as provided for by the Fund’s By-laws. For further details see section h) of the description of compensation of the CEO; and
(g)an insurance against death or permanent inability caused by injury or disease in the exercise of his duties or under certain other circumstances as stipulated collectively for all managers of Italian manufacturing companies.

With the exception of the CEO as described above, none of the Directors of Eni has service contracts with the company or any of its subsidiaries providing for benefits upon termination of employment.

132


Remuneration earned for 2008 by members of the Board of Directors, including the CEO and the Chairman, the three Chief Operating Officers and Eni’s senior managers attending on a permanent basis the meetings of the Steering Committee of Eni (total amount) is reported in the table below. Emoluments earned by the Statutory Auditors of Eni are also included.

Below is a description of each column of the following table:

"Emoluments for service at Eni SpA" include emoluments paid to non-executive and executive directors for service rendered, fixed fees paid to Directors attending the Board’s Committees, and fees paid to Statutory Auditors. Emoluments earned by the Chairman and the CEO include also the portion awarded for the powers entrusted to them by the Board;
"Non cash benefits" comprise amounts referring to all fringe benefits, including insurance policies;
"Bonuses and other incentives" include: (i) performance bonuses awarded in the year to Directors and the Chairman of the Board based on the performance of the Eni share; (ii) performance bonuses awarded in the year to both the Chairman and the CEO in connection with the power entrusted to them by the Board, based on the achievement of specific company targets; and (iii) performance bonuses awarded in the year to the CEO, in his position as General Manager of the parent company, the General Managers of Eni’s divisions and other managers with strategic responsibilities based on the achievement of specific financial, operational and strategic targets and of individual performance targets pertaining to their respective business or functional units;
"Salaries and other elements" report base salaries paid to the CEO, the General Mangers of Eni’s Divisions and other managers with strategic responsibilities, and indemnities paid upon termination of the employment contract.

133


Name

Position

Emoluments for service at Eni SpA

Non-cash benefits

Bonus and other incentives (a)

Salaries and other elements

Total








(thousand euro)

Board of Directors              
Roberto Poli Chairman 

768

 

18

 

345

     

1,131

Paolo Scaroni CEO 

430

 

17

 

1,267

  

1,363

 (b) 

3,077

Alberto Clô Director 

157

         

157

Paolo Andrea Colombo (c) Director 

64

         

64

Renzo Costi (d) Director 

85

         

85

Dario Fruscio (e) Director 

19

         

19

Paolo Marchioni Director 

64

         

64

Marco Pinto (d) Director 

85

         

85

Marco Reboa Director 

157

         

157

Mario Resca Director 

143

         

143

Pierluigi Scibetta Director 

149

         

149

Francesco Taranto Director 

64

         

64

Board of Statutory Auditors              
Paolo Andrea Colombo (d) Chairman 

51

      

33

 (f) 

84

Ugo Marinelli Chairman 

64

         

64

Filippo Duodo (d) Auditor 

35

      

71

 (g) 

106

Roberto Ferranti Auditor 

44

         

44

Edoardo Grisolia (d) (h) Auditor 

35

         

35

Luigi Mandolesi Auditor 

44

         

44

Tiziano Onesti Auditor 

44

      

40

 (i) 

84

Riccardo Perotta (d) Auditor 

35

      

32

 (l) 

67

Giorgio Silva Auditor 

80

      

24

 (m) 

104

Chief Operating Officers              
Stefano Cao (n) Exploration & Production   

1

 

2,294

 (o) 

3,825

 (p) 

6,120

Claudio Descalzi (q) Exploration & Production   

1

    

268

  

269

Domenico Dispenza Gas & Power   

1

 

856

 (r) 

710

  

1,567

Angelo Caridi Refining & Marketing   

2

 

268

  

565

  

835

Other managers with strategic responsibilities (s)     

12

 

3,137

  

6,475

 (t) 

9,624

    

2,617

 

52

 

8,167

  

13,406

  

24,242









(a)iBased on performance achieved in 2007.
(b)iIncluding the base salary of euro 1 million paid to the CEO, in his quality of General Manager, indemnities and other elements for a total amount of euro 363,000 accrued along the service period (from 2005 to 2008), net of the indemnities described under the paragraph "post-retirement benefit of the directors".
(c)iChairman of the Board of Statutory Auditors until June 9, 2008.
(d)iIn office until the Shareholders’ Meeting approving financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2007.
(e)iOn January 30, 2008 Dario Fruscio resigned from the Board of Directors.
(f)iIncludes the compensation obtained as Chairman of the Board of Statutory Auditors of Saipem and EniServizi.
(g)iIncludes the compensation obtained as Statutory Auditor in Snamprogetti SpA and in Polimeri Europa and as Chairman of the Board of Statutory Auditors of CEPAV Uno and CEPAV Due.
(h)iCompensation for the service is paid to the Ministry for Economy and Finance.
(i)iIncludes the compensation obtained as Chairman of the Board of Statutory Auditors of AGI and Servizi Aerei.
(l)iIncludes the compensation obtained as Chairman of the Board of Statutory Auditors of Snam Rete Gas SpA.
(m)iIncludes the compensation obtained as Statutory Auditor in Snamprogetti SpA and as Chairman of the Board of Statutory Auditors of TSKJ Italia Srl.
(n)iIn office until July 31, 2008.
(o)iIncludes the pro-quota portion of deferred bonus awarded for the 2006-2008 three-year period.
(p)iIncludes indemnities paid upon termination.
(q)iAppointed on August 1, 2008.
(r)iIncludes long-term incentives awarded by Snam Rete Gas in 2005, for the position of Chairman of Snam Rete Gas held until December 23, 2005.
(s)iManagers, who during the year with the CEO and the General Managers of Eni divisions, have been member of the Eni Directors Committee (8 managers).
(t)iIncludes indemnities paid upon termination.

For the year ended December 31, 2008, the overall compensation of persons responsible of key positions in planning, direction and control functions of Eni Group companies, including executive and non-executive directors, Chief Operating Officers and Eni’s senior managers amounted to euro 25 million. The break-down is as follows:

2008


(euro million)

Fees and salaries

17

Post employment benefits

1

Other long-term benefits

3

Fair value stock grants/options

4

25


The above amounts include salaries, fees for attending meetings, lump-sum amounts paid in lieu of expense reimbursements, stock-based compensation and other deferred incentive bonuses, health and pension contributions and amounts accrued to the reserve for employee termination indemnities, which is used to pay severance pay as required by Italian law to employees upon termination of employment. The members of the Board of Directors in

134


their capacity as such are not entitled to receive such severance pay. At December 31, 2008, the total amount accrued to the reserve for employee termination indemnities with respect to members of the Board of Directors who were also employees of Eni, the three general managers and Eni’s senior managers was euro 1,548 thousand. The break-down of this amount is presented in the table below:

Name

(euro thousand)


Paolo ScaroniCEO and Chief Operating Officer of Eni164
Claudio DescalziChief Operating Officer of the E&P Division299
Domenico DispenzaChief Operating Officer of the G&P Division418
Angelo CaridiChief Operating Officer of the R&M Division148
Senior managers (a)519

1,548


(a)iNo. 7 managers.


Long-term Incentive Schemes

In March 2006, the Board of Directors approved a new long-term incentive scheme for the managers of Eni and its subsidiaries (excluding listed subsidiaries), as proposed by the Compensation Committee. This new scheme is designed to motivate more effectively and retain managers, linking incentives to targets and performance achieved in a tighter way than previous incentives schemes. This new incentive scheme applies to the 2006-2008 three year period and is composed of a deferred monetary bonus, linked to the achievement of certain business growth and operating efficiency targets, and stock option grants based on the achievement of certain targets of total shareholder return. This scheme has a structure intended to balance monetary and stock-based components of the remuneration, as well as to link economic and operating performance to share performance in the long-term.

Deferred monetary bonus

This leg of the long-term incentive scheme provides a basic bonus paid after three years according to a variable amount equal to a percentage ranging from 0 to 170% of the amount established for the target performance in relation to the performances achieved in a three-year period as approved by the Board of Directors. Performances are measured in terms of achievement of preset annual EBITDA targets, as assessed by comparing actual results with set targets under a constant trading environment.

The following table sets out the basic bonus awarded in the year 2008 to the CEO and to the Chief Operating Officers of Eni’s Divisions, and the total amount awarded to Eni’s senior managers.

Name

Deferred bonus awarded


(euro thousand)

Paolo ScaroniCEO and Chief Operating Officer of Eni1,023
Stefano Cao (a)Chief Operating Officer of the E&P Division494
Claudio Descalzi (b)Chief Operating Officer of the E&P Division215
Domenico DispenzaChief Operating Officer of the G&P Division385
Angelo CaridiChief Operating Officer of the R&M Division312
Senior managers (c)1,732(d)


(a)iPosition held until July 31, 2008.
(b)iAppointed on August 1, 2008.
(c)iNo. 8 managers.
(d)iIncluding the deferred bonus granted by Saipem to a manager with strategic responsibilities, appointed in Eni on August 1, 2008.

Stock Options

Eni can award share options to managers holding strategic positions or positions of significant responsibility for the achievement of the Company’s results. This incentive scheme is designed to ensure that managers’ interests are aligned with those of shareholders and to stimulate entrepreneurial behavior on part of managers. Differently from previous schemes, the 2006-2008 stock option plan introduced a performance condition upon which grants can be exercised. At the end of each vesting period with a three-year duration, the Board of Directors determines the number of exercisable options, in a percentage ranging from 0% to 100% of the total amount awarded for each year

135


of the scheme, depending on the performance of Eni shares measured in terms of annual Total Shareholders Return as compared to that achieved by a panel of major international oil companies in terms of market capitalization. Options can be exercised for a three year period. Under this plan, the Board resolved to make available 7,415,000 options pertaining to 2008 with a strike price equal to euro 22.540 and 6,128,500 options pertaining to 2007 with a strike price equal to euro 27.451.

At December 31, 2008, a total of 23,557,425 options were outstanding for the purchase of an equal amount of ordinary shares nominal value euro 1 of Eni SpA, carrying an average strike price of euro 23.540. The weighted average remaining contractual life of options outstanding at December 31, 2007 and 2008 was 4 years and 7 months and 5 years and 7 months respectively.

The following is a summary of stock option activity for the years 2007 and 2008:

 

2007

 

2008

 
 

Number of shares

Weighted average exercise price
(euro)

Market price (a)
(euro)

Number of shares

Weighted average exercise price
(euro)

Market price (a)
(euro)







Options as of January 1 15,290,400  21.022 25.520 17,699,625  23.822 25.120
New options granted 6,128,500  27.451 27.447 7,415,000  22.540 22.538
Options exercised in the period (3,028,200) 16.906 25.338 (582,100) 17.054 24.328
Options cancelled in the period (691,075) 24.346 24.790 (975,100) 24.931 19.942
Options outstanding as of December 31 17,699,625  23.822 25.120 23,557,425  23.540 16.556
of which exercisable at December 31 2,292,125  18.440 25.120 5,184,250  21.263 16.556







(a)Market price relating to new rights assigned, rights exercised in the period and rights cancelled in the period corresponds to the average market value (arithmetic average of official prices recorded on Mercato Telematico Azionario in the month preceding: (i) the date of assignment; (ii) the date of the recording in the securities account of the managers to whom the options have been assigned; (iii) the date of the unilateral termination of employment for rights cancelled). Market price of shares referring to options as of the beginning and the end of the year, is the price recorded at December 31.

The fair value of stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008 of euro 2.98 and euro 2.60, respectively, was calculated applying the Black-Scholes method and using the following assumptions:

   

2007

 

2008

   
 
Risk-free interest rate (%) 4.7 4.9
Expected life (year) 6 6
Expected volatility (%) 16.3 19.2
Expected dividends (%) 4.9 6.1


136


The following table presents the amount of stock options awarded to Eni’s CEO, the three Chief Operating Officers and Eni’s senior managers.

CEO and COO of EniCOO of
E&P Division
COO of
E&P Division
COO of
G&P Division
COO of
R&M Division
Senior managers(a)






Paolo Scaroni (b)Stefano Cao (c)Claudio Descalzi (d)Domenico DispenzaAngelo Caridi






Options outstanding at the beginning of the period:                       
- number of options   

1,953,000

 

406,500

 

178,500

 

232,500

 

269,500

 (e) 

30,500

 

122,000

 (f) 

1,353,000

 

110,000

 (g)
- average exercise price 

(euro)

 

24.165

 

24.655

 

24.713

 

25.159

 

3.988

  

22.509

 

21.098

  

23.985

 

18.953

 
- average maturity in months   

63

 

62

 

62

 

60

 

61

  

67

 

60

  

61

 

56

 
Options granted during the period:                       
- number of options   

634,500

 

-

 

85,500

 

147,500

    

120,000

 

-

  

584,000

 

-

 
- average exercise price 

(euro)

 

22.540

 

-

 

22.540

 

22.540

    

22.540

 

-

  

22.540

 

-

 
- average maturity in months   

72

 

-

 

72

 

72

    

72

 

-

  

72

 

-

 
Options exercised at the end of the period:                       
- number of options   

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

127,500

 (e) 

-

 

-

  

68,500

 

29,500

 (g)
- average exercise price 

(euro)

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

3.530

  

-

 

-

  

16.576

 

11.881

 
- average market price at date of exercise 

(euro)

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

4.095

  

-

 

-

  

23.996

 

24.541

 
Options expired during the period:                       
- number of options     

206,375

 

-

 

-

 

-

  

-

 

-

  

167,550

 

-

 
Options outstanding at the end of the period:                       
- number of options   

2,587,500

 

200,125

 

264,000

 

380,000

 

142,000

 (e) 

150,500

 

122,000

 (f) 

1,700,950

 

80,500

 (g)
- average exercise price 

(euro)

 

23.767

 

24.060

 

24.009

 

24.142

 

4.399

  

22.534

 

21.098

  

23.670

 

21.545

 
- average maturity in months   

55

 

51

 

55

 

56

 

54

  

65

 

48

  

55

 

48

 







(a)iNo. 8 managers.
(b)The assignment to the CEO have been integrated by a monetary incentive to be paid after three-year in relation to the performance of Eni shares, and is equal to 96,000 options granted in 2006, with a strike price of euro 23.100 and 80,500 options granted in 2007, with a strike price of euro 27.451.
(c)iIn office until July 31, 2008.
(d)iAppointed on August 1, 2008.
(e)iOptions on Snam Rete Gas shares: assigned by the company to Domenico Dispenza who held the position of Chairman of Snam Rete Gas until December 23, 2005.
(f)iOptions on Saipem shares: assigned by the company to Angelo Caridi who held the position of CEO of Snamprogetti until August 2, 2007.
(g)iOptions on Saipem shares.


Employees

At December 31, 2008, Eni’s employees totaled 78,880, withreflects an increase of 3,018 employees from December 31, 2007, up 4%, reflecting a 2,965 increase in718 employees hired and working outside Italy and an increasea decrease of 53718 employees hired in Italy.

Employees hired in Italy were 39,480 (50.1%38,299 (48.9% of all Group employees). Of these, 35,92934,794 were working in Italy, 3,3813,282 outside Italy and 170223 on board of vessels, with a 531,181 unit increasedecrease from 2007.2008. Declines were registered in all business segments due to efficiency actions and to the postponement to 2010 of some orders obtained by Saipem.

The process of improvement in the quality mix of employees continued in 20082009 with the hiring of 2,5171,163 persons, of which 781, were with491 had fixed-term contracts. A total of 1,736672 persons were hired with open-endopen-ended and with apprenticeship contracts, most of them with university qualifications (1,048(359 persons) and 650282 persons with a high school diploma. During the year 2,5492,357 persons left their job at Eni, of these 1,9031,634 had an open-end contract and 646 had491 a fixed-term contract.

Employees hired and working outside Italy were 38,400 (49.9%40,118 (51.1% of all Group employees), with a 2,965 personsan increase of these718 persons, of which approximately 1,800650 employees were hired with fixed-term contracts in the Engineering & Construction segment mainly due mainly to new contracts in the Caspian area (Kazakhstan, KashaganNigeria and Kazakhstan (Kashagan project) and Peru/Venezuela (drilling projects), and 1,642160 persons in the Exploration & Production segment, mainly following the purchase of Burren and First Calgary Petroleums (1,150 persons). Inoffset by downsizing in other segments, in particular in Hungary in the Gas & Power segment the acquisition of Distrigas concerned 135 persons and in the Refining & Marketing segment, Agip España (850 persons) and Galp Energia were sold.(Tigaz).

137


Employees at year end 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
Employees at year end 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
 

(units)

Exploration & Production 8,336 9,334 11,194 9,023 10,891 10,870
Gas & Power 12,074 11,582 11,389 11,893 11,692 11,404
Refining & Marketing 9,437 9,428 8,327 9,428 8,327 8,166
Petrochemicals 6,025 6,534 6,274 6,534 6,274 6,068
Engineering & Construction 30,902 33,111 35,629 33,111 35,629 35,969
Other activities 2,219 1,172 1,070 1,172 1,070 968
Corporate and financial companies 4,579 4,701 4,997 4,701 4,997 4,972
 
 
 
 
 
 
 73,572 75,862 78,880 75,862 78,880 78,417
 
 
 
 
 
 

143


The table below sets forth Eni’s employees atas of December 31, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 20082009 in Italy and outside Italy:

  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
  

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
 

(units)

Exploration & Production Italy 5,273 5,535 5,771
  Outside Italy 3,063 3,799 5,423
    8,336 9,334 11,194
Gas & Power Italy 9,602 9,114 8,810
  Outside Italy 2,472 2,468 2,579
    12,074 11,582 11,389
Refining & Marketing Italy 7,196 7,101 6,641
  Outside Italy 2,241 2,327 1,686
    9,437 9,428 8,327
Petrochemicals Italy 4,948 5,476 5,230
  Outside Italy 1,077 1,058 1,044
    6,025 6,534 6,274
Engineering & Construction Italy 6,164 6,618 7,316
  Outside Italy 24,738 26,493 28,313
    30,902 33,111 35,629
Other activities Italy 2,219 1,172 1,070
  Outside Italy - - -
    2,219 1,172 1,070
Corporate and financial companies Italy 4,363 4,411 4,642
  Outside Italy 216 290 355
    4,579 4,701 4,997
Total Italy 39,765 39,427 39,480
Total Outside Italy 33,807 36,435 39,400
    73,572 75,862 78,880
of which senior managers   1,603 1,585 1,658



Exploration & ProductionItaly 5,224 5,468 5,287
 Outside Italy 3,799 5,423 5,583
   
 
 
   9,023 10,891 10,870
   
 
 
Gas & PowerItaly 9,425 9,113 8,911
 Outside Italy 2,468 2,579 2,493
   
 
 
   11,893 11,692 11,404
   
 
 
Refining & MarketingItaly 7,101 6,641 6,493
 Outside Italy 2,327 1,686 1,673
   
 
 
   9,428 8,327 8,166
   
 
 
PetrochemicalsItaly 5,476 5,230 5,054
 Outside Italy 1,058 1,044 1,014
   
 
 
   6,534 6,274 6,068
   
 
 
Engineering & ConstructionItaly 6,618 7,316 7,003
 Outside Italy 26,493 28,313 28,966
   
 
 
   33,111 35,629 35,969
   
 
 
Other activitiesItaly 1,172 1,070 968
 Outside Italy - - -
   
 
 
   1,172 1,070 968
   
 
 
Corporate and financial companiesItaly 4,411 4,642 4,583
 Outside Italy 290 355 389
   
 
 
   4,701 4,997 4,972
   
 
 
TotalItaly 39,427 39,480 38,299
TotalOutside Italy 36,435 39,400 40,118
   
 
 
   75,862 78,880 78,417
   
 
 
of which senior managers  1,585 1,658 1,649
   
 
 

Share Ownership

As of April 30, 2009,March 29, 2010, the cumulative number of shares owned by the Eni’s directors, statutory auditors and senior managers, including the three Chief Operating Officers, was 242,769231,870 equal to approximately 0.006% of Eni’s share capital outstanding as of the same data. In this time frame, no further options to purchase Eni shares were granted by the Company to those persons (see tables in the section "Stock Option Plans"). Eni issues only ordinary shares, each bearing one-vote right; therefore shares held by those persons have no different voting rights. The break-down of share ownership for each of those persons is provided below.

138144


NamePosition

Number of shares owned

Option granted(*)

  
Board of Directors-
Roberto PoliChairman58,549
Paolo ScaroniCEO and COO of Eni-
Alberto ClôDirector-
Paolo Andrea ColomboDirector1,650
Paolo MarchioniDirector-
Marco ReboaDirector-
Mario RescaDirector-
Pierluigi ScibettaDirector-
Francesco TarantoDirector500
Chief Executive Officers
Claudio DescalziChief Operating Officer of the E&P Division24,455
Domenico DispenzaChief Operating Officer of the G&P Division99,715
Angelo CaridiChief Operating Officer of the R&M Division40,595
Board of Statutory Auditors1,000
Senior managers16,305
 
Board of Directors      
Roberto Poli Chairman    
Paolo Scaroni CEO and COO of Eni 56,250 1,894,230
Alberto Clô Director    
Paolo Andrea Colombo Director 1,650  
Paolo Marchioni Director 600  
Marco Reboa Director    
Mario Resca Director    
Pierluigi Scibetta Director    
Francesco Taranto Director 500  
Chief Executive Officers      
Claudio Descalzi Chief Operating Officer of the E&P Division 24,455 182,830
Domenico Dispenza Chief Operating Officer of the G&P Division 99,715 251,275
Angelo Caridi Chief Operating Officer of the R&M Division 40,595 150,500
Board of Statutory Auditors   1,000  
Senior managers   7,105 1,213,995
    
 

(*)The Board of Directors, in its meeting of March 11, 2010, determined the number of exercisable options for the 2006-2008 stock option plan, within the number of previously granted rights as of December 31, 2009, as the relevant vesting conditions were assessed (For further details see tables in the section “Stock Option Plans”).

 

Item 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Major Shareholders

As of May 4, 2009,March 29, 2010, the following persons were known by Eni to own more than 2% of any class of Eni SpA’s voting securities. At such date, the total amount of Eni SpA’s voting securities owned by these shareholders was:

Title of class 

Number of shares owned

 

Percent of class

 

Number of shares owned

 

Percent of class


 
 
 
 
Ministry of Economy and Finance 

813,443,277

 

20.3

 

813,443,277

 

20.3

Cassa Depositi e Prestiti 

400,288,338

 

10.0

 

400,288,338

 

10.0

BNP Paribas Group 

93,822,428

 

2.3


 
 
 
 

The Ministry of Economy and Finance, in agreement with the Ministry of Economic Development, retains certain special powers over Eni. See "Item 10 – Additional Information – Memorandum and Articles of Association – Limitations on Voting and Shareholdings – Special Powers of the State". For a discussion of the Eni share buy-back program see "Item 16E – Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers". As of May 4, 2009March 29, 2010 there were 44,072,28236,275,119 ADRs, each representing two Eni ordinary shares outstanding corresponding to 2.2%2% of Eni’s share capital. See "Item 9 – The Offer and the Listing".

 

Related Party Transactions

In the ordinary course of its business, Eni enters into transactions concerning the exchange of goods, provision of services and financing with non consolidated subsidiaries and affiliates as well other companies owned or controlled by the Italian Government. All such transactions are conducted on an arm’s length basis and in the interest of Eni companies.

Amounts and types of trade and financial transactions with related parties and their impact on consolidated earnings and cash flow, and on the Group’s assets and financial condition are reported in Note 37 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

145


Item 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information

See Item"Item 18 – Financial Statements.Statements".

139


Legal Proceedings

Eni is a party to a number of civil actions and administrative arbitral and other judicial proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Based on information available to date, and taking into account the existing risk provisions, Eni believes that the foregoing will not have an adverse effect on Eni’s Consolidated Financial Statements. The following is

For a description of the most significant proceedings currently pending. Unless otherwise indicated below, no provisions have been made for these legal proceedings asin which Eni believes that negative outcomes are not probable or because the amountis involved and which may affect Eni’s financial position and results of the provision cannot be estimated reliably.

Environment

Criminal proceedings

ENI SPA
Subsidence. The Court of Rovigo conducted investigations concerning a subsidence phenomenon allegedly caused by hydrocarbon exploration and extraction activities in the Ravenna and North Adriatic area both on land and in the sea. Eni appointed an independent and interdisciplinary scientific commission, composed of prominent and highly qualified international experts of subsidence caused by hydrocarbon exploration and extraction activities, with the aim of verifying the magnitude and effects and any actions appropriate to reduce or to neutralize any subsidence phenomenon in the area. This commission produced a study which excludes the possibility of any risk to human health or damageoperations see Note 28 to the environment. The study also states that worldwide there are no instances of accidents of harm to public safety caused by subsidence induced by hydrocarbon production. It also shows that Eni employs the most advanced techniques for monitoring, measuring and controlling the soil. This proceeding is in the first level hearing stage. The Veneto Region, other local bodies and two private entities have been acting as plaintiffs. Eni was admitted as a defendant. The Court decided that the proceeding must be heard by the Court of Ravenna.

Alleged damage. In 2002, the public prosecutor of Gela commenced a criminal investigation to ascertain alleged damage caused by emissions of the Gela plant, owned by Polimeri Europa SpA, Syndial SpA (formerly EniChem SpA) and Raffineria di Gela SpA. The judge for the preliminary hearing dismissed the accusation of adulteration of food products, while the proceeding for the other allegations regarding pollution and environmental damage remains underway. The trial ended in acquittal with regard to the general manager and officer pro tempore of the refinery. The sentence of the Gela Tribunal stated that the charges were lacking factual basis.

Alleged negligent fire in the refinery of Gela. In June 2002, in connection with a fire at the refinery of Gela, a criminal investigation began concerning alleged negligent fire, environmental crimes and crimes against natural beauty. First degree proceedings ended with an acquittal sentence. In November 2007, the public prosecutors of Gela and of Caltanissetta filed an appeal against this decision.

Investigation of the quality of ground water in the area of the refinery of Gela. In 2002, the public prosecutor of Gela commenced a criminal investigation concerning the refinery of Gela to ascertain the quality of ground water in the area of the refinery. Eni is charged of having breached environmental rules concerning the pollution of water and soil and of illegal disposal of liquid and solid waste materials. The preliminary hearing phase was closed for one employee who would stand trial, while the preliminary hearing phase is ongoing for other defendants. During the hearings the judge admitted as plaintiffs three environmental associations.

Alleged negligent fire (Priolo). The public prosecutor of Siracusa commenced an investigation regarding certain Eni managers who were previously in charge of conducting operations at the Priolo refinery (Eni divested this asset in 2002) to ascertain whether they acted with negligence in connection with a fire that occurred at the Priolo plants on April 30 and May 1-2, 2006. After preliminary investigations and based on the outcome of preliminary hearing the public prosecutor requested the opening of a proceeding against the mentioned managers for negligent behavior.

Groundwater at the Priolo site. The Public Prosecutor of Siracusa (Sicily) has started an investigation in order to ascertain the level of contamination of the groundwater at the Priolo site. The Company has been notified that a number of its executive officers are being investigated who were in charge at the time of the events subject to probe, including chief executive officers and plant general managers of the Company’s subsidiaries AgipPetroli SpA (now merged into the parent company), Syndial and Polimeri Europa. Probes on technical issues are ongoing as required by the Prosecutor.

ENIPOWER SPA
Alleged unauthorized waste management activities. In 2004, the public prosecutor of Rovigo commenced an investigation for alleged crimes related to unauthorized waste management activities in Loreo relating to the samples of soil used during the construction of the new EniPower power station in Mantova. The prosecutor requested the CEO of EniPower and the managing director of the Mantova plant at the time of the alleged crime to stand trial.

140


Air emissions. The public prosecutor of Mantova commenced an investigation against two managers of the Mantova plant in connection with air emissions by the new power plant.

SYNDIAL SPA
Porto Torres. In March 2009, the Public Prosecutor of Sassari (Sardinia) resolved to commence a criminal trial against a number of executive officers and managing directors of companies engaging in petrochemicals operations at the site of Porto Torres, including the manager responsible for plant operations of the Company’s fully-owned subsidiary Syndial. The charge involves environmental damage and poisoning of water and stuff destined to feeding. A preliminary hearing is scheduled in July 2009.

Civil and administrative proceedings

SYNDIAL SPA (FORMER ENICHEM SPA)
Alleged pollution caused by the activity of the Mantova plant. In 1992, the Ministry of Environment summoned EniChem SpA (now Syndial SpA) and Edison SpA before the Court of Brescia. The Ministry requested, primarily, environmental remediation for the alleged pollution caused by the activity of the Mantova plant from 1976 until 1990, and provisionally, in case there was no possibility to remediate, the payment of environmental damages. Edison agreed on a settlement with the Ministry whereby Edison quantified compensation for environmental damage freeing from any obligation Syndial, which purchased the plant in 1989. Parties are working through a possible settlement of the matter.

Summon before the Court of Venice for environmental damages allegedly caused to the lagoon of Venice by the Porto Marghera plants. On December 13, 2002, EniChem SpA (now Syndial SpA), jointly with Ambiente SpA (now merged into Syndial SpA) and European Vinyls Corporation Italia SpA, was summoned before the Court of Venice by the Province of Venice. The province requested compensation for environmental damages that were not quantified, allegedly caused to the lagoon of Venice by the Porto Marghera plants, which were already the subject of two previous criminal proceedings against employees and managers of the defendants. EVC Italia and Ineos presented an action to be indemnified by Eni’s Group companies in case the alleged pollution is proved. The environmental damage has been assessed by an independent consultant who filed his advice to be discussed in a hearing set in October 2009.

Claim of environmental damages, allegedly caused by industrial activities in the area of Crotone, commenced by the President of the Regional Council of Calabria. On April 14, 2003, the President of the Regional Council of Calabria, as Delegated Commissioner for Environmental Emergency in the Calabria Region, commenced an action against EniChem SpA (now Syndial SpA) with reference to environmental damages for approximately euro 129 million and damages for euro 250 million (plus interest and compensation) in connection with loss of income and damage to property allegedly caused by industrial activities in the area of Crotone. In addition, the Province of Crotone is acting as plaintiff, claiming damage for euro 300 million. With a decision in May 2007, the Court of Milan declared the invalidity of the power of proxy conferred to the Delegated Commissioner to act on behalf of the Calabria Region with the notice served to Syndial SpA and decided the liquidation of expenses born by the defendant. The Province of Crotone appealed this decision. The second instance court accepted this appeal and Syndial repealed this determination. On October 21, 2004, Syndial was convened before the Court of Milan by the Calabria Region which is seeking to obtain a condemnation of Syndial for a damage payment, should the office of the Delegated Commissioner for Environmental Emergency in the Calabria Region cease during this proceeding. The Calabria Region requested a damage payment amounting to euro 800 million as already requested by the Delegated Commissioner for Environmental Emergency in the Calabria Region in the proceeding commenced in 2003. This new proceeding is in the preliminary investigation stage. This proceeding was unified with the one opened by the Ministry of the Environment. Syndial filed a new project for the environmental remediation of the site to be approved by the Ministry and the body of public administrations and entities involved in the matter that expressed a first partial consent in January 2009. The environmental provision was consequently increased. In 2006, the Council of Ministers, Ministry for the Environment and the Delegated Commissioner for Environmental Emergency in the Calabria Region represented by the State Lawyer requested Syndial to appear before the Court of Milan to obtain the ascertainment, quantification and payment of damage (in the form of land, air and water pollution and therefore of the general condition of the population) caused by the operations of Pertusola Sud SpA in the Municipality of Crotone and in surrounding municipalities. The local authorities requested the ascertainment of Syndial’s responsibility as concerns expenses borne and to be borne for the cleanup and reclamation of sites, currently quantified at euro 129 million. This proceeding concerns the same matter and damage claim as the proceedings commenced by the Delegated Commissioner for Environmental Emergency in the Calabria Region and the Calabria Region against Syndial in 2003 and 2004, respectively.

Summon for alleged environmental damage caused by DDT pollution in the Lake Maggiore. With a temporarily executive decision dated July 3, 2008 the District Court of Turin sentenced the subsidiary Syndial SpA (former EniChem) to compensate for environmental damages that were allegedly caused when EniChem managed an industrial plant at Pieve Vergonte during the 1990-1996 period. Specifically, the Court sentenced Syndial to pay the Italian Ministry of the Environment compensation amounting to euro 1,833.5 million, plus legal interests that

141


accrue from the filing of the decision. Syndial and Eni technical-legal consultants have considered the decision and the amount of the compensation to be without factual and legal basis and have concluded that a negative outcome of this proceeding is unlikely. Particularly, Eni and its subsidiary deem the amount of the environmental damage to be absolutely ill-founded as the sentence has been considered to lack sufficient elements to support such a material amount of the liability charged to Eni and its subsidiary with respect to the volume of pollutants ascertained by the Italian Environmental Minister. As no development of the proceeding has occurred since the filing of the Court’s decision, management has confirmed its stance of making no provision for this proceeding in accordance with accounting principles. Syndial will appeal against the ruling on Pieve Vergonte site of the District Court of Turin as soon as possible. Another administrative proceeding is ongoing regarding a ministerial decree enacted by the Italian Ministry for the Environment. The decree provides that Syndial executes the following tasks: (i) the upgrading of a hydraulic barrier to protect the site; and (ii) the design of a project for the environmental remediation of Lake Maggiore. The Administrative Court of Piemonte rejected Syndial’s opposition against the outlined environmental measures requested by the Ministry of the Environment. However, the Court judged the prescriptions of the Ministry regarding the remediation of the site to be plain findings of an environmental enquiry to ascertain the state of the lake. Syndial has filed an appeal against the decision of the Court before an upper degree body, also requesting suspension of the effectiveness of the decision. The appeal has been put on hold considering that a plan to ascertain the environmental status of the site is going to be approved by all interested parties, including the Ministry and local municipalities.

Action commenced by the Municipality of Carrara for the remediation and reestablishment of previous environmental conditions at the Avenza site and payment of environmental damage. The Municipality of Carrara commenced an action before the Court of Genova requesting Syndial SpA to remediate and restore previous environmental conditions at the Avenza site and the payment of certain environmental damage which cannot be cleaned up as well as further damages of various types (e.g. damage to the natural beauty of this site). This request is related to an accident that occurred in 1984, as a consequence of which EniChem Agricoltura SpA (later merged into Syndial SpA), at the time owner of the site, carried out safety and remediation works. The Ministry of the Environment joined the action and requested environmental damage payment – from a minimum of euro 53.5 million to a maximum of euro 93.3 million – to be broken down among the various companies that ran the plant in the past. Syndial summoned Rumianca SpA, Sir Finanziaria SpA and Sogemo SpA, who ran the plant in previous years, in order to be guaranteed. A report produced by an independent expert appointed by the judge was filed with the Court. The findings of this report quantify the residual environmental damage at euro 15 million. With a sentence of March 2008, the Court of Genova rejected all claims made by the Municipality of Carrara and the Ministry of environment. Both plaintiffs filed an appeal against this decision in June 2008, requesting to all defendants cumulative damage amounting to euro 189.9 million. Syndial filed in the appeal hearing, disputing the plaintiffs’ claims.

Ministry for the Environment Augusta harbor. The Italian Ministry for the Environment with various administrative acts ordered companies running plants in the petrochemical site of Priolo to perform safety and environmental remediation works in the Augusta harbor. Companies involved include Eni subsidiaries Polimeri Europa and Syndial. Pollution has been detected in this area primarily due to a high mercury concentration which is allegedly attributed to the industrial activity of the Priolo petrochemical site. Polimeri Europa opposed said administrative actions, objecting in particular to the way in which remediation works have been designed and information on concentration of pollutants has been gathered. The Regional Administrative Court of Catania with its decision of July 2007 annulled the decision made by the Service Conference of the Ministry of the Environment concerning Priolo and the Augusta harbor. The Ministry and the municipalities of Augusta and Melilli filed a claim with an Administrative Court of the Sicily Region which accepted the claim. In January 2008 the Regional Court of Catania accepted two further claims on this matter, remitting to the European Union Court of Justice the correct application of the debated community principle on the matter of environmental responsibility. In June 2008 the Ministry for the Environment and the Municipalities of Melilli and Augusta filed and appeal against the decision of the Regional Court of Catania with the Administrative Justice Council. Syndial challenged the administrative acts of December 20, 2007 and March 6, 2008, also requesting the Court of Justice of the EU to decide on the correct application of the debated community principle. A review of the issue made by an independent consultant has been filed showing evidence supporting the thesis of the plaintiffs. The proceedings are still pending before the Administrative Court of Lazio.

ENI SPA
Reorganization procedure of the airlines companies Volare Group, Volare Airlines and Air Europe. On March 2009 Eni was notified a bankruptcy claw-back as part of a reorganization procedure filed by the airlines companies Volare Group, Volare Airlines and Air Europe which commenced under the provisions of Ministry of Production Activities, on November 30, 2004. The request regarded the override of all the payments made by those entities to Eni and its subsidiary Sofid in the year previous to the insolvency declaration from November 30, 2003 to November 29, 2004, for a total estimated amount of euro 46 million.

142


Other judicial or arbitration proceedings

SYNDIAL SPA (FORMER ENICHEM SPA)
Serfactoring: disposal of receivables. In 1991, Agrifactoring SpA commenced proceedings against Serfactoring SpA, a company 49% owned by Sofid SpA and which is controlled by Eni SpA. The claim relates to an amount receivable of euro 182 million for fertilizer sales (plus interest and compensation for inflation), originally owed by Federconsorzi to EniChem Agricoltura SpA (later Agricoltura SpA - in liquidation), and Terni Industrie Chimiche SpA (merged into Agricoltura SpA - in liquidation), that has been merged into EniChem SpA (now Syndial SpA). Such receivables were transferred by Agricoltura and Terni Industrie Chimiche to Serfactoring, which appointed Agrifactoring as its agent to collect payments. Agrifactoring guaranteed to pay the amount of such receivables to Serfactoring, regardless of whether or not it received payment on the due date. Following payment by Agrifactoring to Serfactoring, Agrifactoring was placed in liquidation and the liquidator of Agrifactoring commenced proceedings in 1991 against Serfactoring to recover such payments (equal to euro 182 million) made to Serfactoring based on the claim that the foregoing guarantee became invalid when Federconsorzi was itself placed in liquidation. Agricoltura and Terni Industrie Chimiche brought counterclaims against Agrifactoring (in liquidation) for damages amounting to euro 97 million relating to acts carried out by Agrifactoring SpA as agent. The amount of these counterclaims has subsequently been reduced to euro 46 million following partial payment of the original receivables by the liquidator of Federconsorzi and various setoffs. These proceedings, which have all been joined, were decided with a partial judgment, deposited on February 24, 2004; the request of Agrifactoring has been rejected and the company has been ordered to pay the sum requested by Serfactoring and damages in favor of Agricoltura, to be determined following the decision. A final verdict on this issue is pending. Agrifactoring appealed this partial decision, requesting in particular the annulment of the first step judgment, the reimbursement of euro 180 million from Serfactoring along with the rejection of all its claims and the payment of all proceeding expenses. On June 2008, the trial was decided with a partial judgment that, reforming the previous judgment of the Court of Rome, granted the requests of Agrifactoring and condemned Serfactoring to reimburse to Agrifactoring in liquidation the amount of the receivables due from Federconsorzi and not collected as Federconsorzi went bankrupt. The Court resolved to appoint an independent accounting consultant to quantify the amount paid by Agrifactoring to Serfactoring and amounts paid by Federconsorzi to Agrifactoring. The hearing has been rescheduled to February 2010 in order to allow the Court to review the independent accounting consultant’s advice. Syndial and Serfactoring have appealed the sentence with the Supreme Court of Appeal. Agrifactoring has presented a counter-recourse. Eni accrued a provision with respect to this proceeding.

ENI SPA
Fintermica. Fintermica presented a claim against Eni concerning the management of the Jacorossi joint venture with reference to an alleged abuse of key roles played by Eni SpA in the joint venture, thus damaging the other partner’s interest and the alleged dilatory behavior of Syndial in selling its interest in the joint venture to Fintermica. The parties decided to commence arbitration on the matter. The examining phase is ongoing and an independent assessment of this matter is being executed. The Board of Arbitrators issued a decision on November 26, 2008 condemning Eni and Syndial to compensate Fintermica for the damages suffered amounting to euro 5 million including monetary revaluation and accrued interest as of April 3, 2001.

SNAMPROGETTI SPA
CEPAV Uno and CEPAV Due. Eni holds interests in the CEPAV Uno (50.36%) and CEPAV Due (52%) consortia that in 1991 signed two contracts with TAV SpA for the construction of two railway tracks for high speed/high capacity trains from Milan to Bologna (under construction) and from Milan to Verona (in the design phase). With regard to the project for the construction of the line from Milan to Bologna, an Addendum to the contract between CEPAV Uno and TAV was signed on June 27, 2003, redefining certain terms and conditions of the contract. Subsequently, the CEPAV Uno consortium requested a time extension for the completion of works and a claim amounting to euro 800 million. CEPAV Uno and TAV failed to solve this dispute amicably. CEPAV Uno opened an arbitration procedure as provided for under terms of the contract on April 27, 2006. With regard to the project for the construction of a high-speed railway from Milan to Verona, in December 2004, CEPAV Due presented the final project, prepared in accordance with Law No. 443/2001 on the basis of the preliminary project approved by an Italian governmental authority (CIPE). As concerns the arbitration procedure requested by CEPAV Due against TAV for the recognition of costs incurred by the Consortium in the 1991-2000 ten-year period plus suffered damage, in January 2007, the arbitration committee determined the Consortium’s right to recover the costs incurred in connection with the design activities performed. A technical independent survey is underway to assess the amount of compensation to be awarded to the Consortium as requested by the arbitration committee. TAV appealed the arbitration committee’s determination. In April 2007, the Consortium filed with the second instance court of Rome an appeal against Law Decree No. 7 of December 31, 2007, that revoked the concessions awarded to TAV resulting in the annulment of arrangements signed between TAV and the Consortium to build the high-speed railway section from Milan to Verona. The European Court of Justice was requested to judge on this matter. In the meantime, TAV decided to not request the reimbursement of advances paid to the Consortium. Subsequently, Law 133/2008 re-established the concessions awarded to TAV resulting in the continuation of the arrangements between the consortium CEPAV Due and a new entity in charge of managing the Italian railway system.

143


Antitrust, EU Proceedings, Actions of the Authority for Electricity and Gas and of Other Regulatory Authorities

Antitrust

ENI SPA
Abuse of dominant position of Snam alleged by the Italian Antitrust Authority. In March 1999, the Italian Antitrust Authority concluded its investigation started in 1997 and: (i) found that Snam SpA (merged in Eni SpA in 2002) abused its dominant position in the market for the transportation and primary distribution of natural gas relating to the transportation and distribution tariffs applied to third parties and the access of third parties to infrastructure; (ii) fined Snam for euro 2 million; and (iii) ordered a review of the practices relating to such abuses. Snam believes it has complied with existing legislation and appealed the decision with the Regional Administrative Court of Lazio requesting its suspension. On May 26, 1999, stating that these decisions are against Law No. 9/1991 and the European Directive 98/30/EC, this Court granted the suspension of the decision. The Authority did not appeal this decision. The decision on the merit of this dispute is still pending before the same Administrative Court.

Formal assessment commenced by the Commission of the European Communities for the evaluation of alleged participation to activities limiting competition in the field of paraffin. On April 28, 2005, the Commission of the European Communities commenced a formal assessment to evaluate the alleged participation of Eni and its subsidiaries in activities limiting competition in the field of paraffin. The alleged violation of competition is for: (i) the determination of and increase in prices; (ii) the subdivision of customers; and (iii) exchange of trade secrets, such as production capacity and sales volumes. After, the Commission requested information on Eni’s activities in the field of paraffin and certain documentation acquired by the Commission during an inspection. Eni filed the requested information. On October 2008, the Commission of the European Communities issued the final decision on the matter condemning Eni to the payment of a sanction amounting to euro 29,120,000. Eni has filed for recourse against this decision that is fully covered by the accrued risk provision.

Ascertainment by the European Commission of the level of competition in the European natural gas market. As part of its activities to ascertain the level of competition in the European natural gas market, with Decision No. C (2006)1920/1 of May 5, 2006, the European Commission informed Eni that the Group companies were subject to an inquiry under Article 20, paragraph 4 of the European Regulation No. 1/2003 of the Council in order to verify the possible existence of any business conducts breaching European rules in terms of competition and intended to prevent access to the Italian natural gas wholesale market and to subdivide the market among few operators in the activity of supply and transport of natural gas. Similar actions have been performed by the Commission also against the main operators in natural gas in Germany, France, Austria and Belgium. In April 2007, the European Commission made public its decision to start a further stage of inquiry, as the elements collected supported its suspicion that Eni adopted behaviors leading to "capacity hoarding and strategic, in its view, underinvestment in the transmission system leading to the foreclosure of competitors and harm for competition and customers in one or more supply markets in Italy". On March 9, 2009 Eni received a Statement of Objections related to a proceeding under Article No. 82 of the EU Treaty and Article No. 54 of the SEE agreement with reference to an alleged unjustifiable refusal of access to the TAG and TENP/Transitgas gas pipelines, that are interconnected with the Italian gas transport system through actions intended to "capacity hoarding, capacity degradation and strategic limitation of investment" with the effect of "hindering the development of a real competition in the downstream market and [...] harming the consumers". The European Commission envisages the possible imposition of a fine and of structural remedies. The Company is currently assessing the reasoning underlying the Commission’s objections in order to ascertain whether the challenged actions are supported by evidence and may be qualified as infringement of the European competition rules. The Company will file its defensive memories within the proceeding. In addition, and following the aforementioned assessment, the Company may consider whether to voluntarily file a set of remedies to settle the proceeding as provided by Article No. 9 of the European Regulation No. 1/2003. Taking into account the numerous elements to be considered in determining the amount of the fine, the complex checks to carry out with respect to the Statement of Objections, and also the circumstance that the Commission’s approval of the possible remedies, presented by Eni pursuant to European Regulation No. 1/2003, would settle the matter without imposing a fine, management believes that the liability is contingent upon the future events described and cannot be measured with reasonable reliability.

TTPC. In April 2006, Eni filed a claim before the Regional Administrative Court of Lazio against the decision of the Italian Antitrust Authority of February 15, 2006 stating that Eni’s behavior pertaining to implementations of plans for the upgrading of the TTPC pipeline for importing natural gas from Algeria represented an abuse of dominant position under Article 82 of the European Treaty and fined Eni. The initial fine amounted to euro 390 million and was reduced to euro 290 million in consideration of Eni’s commitment to perform actions favoring competition including the upgrade of the gasline. Eni accrued a provision with respect to this proceeding. With a decision filed on November 29, 2006, the Regional Administrative Court of Lazio partially accepted Eni’s claim, annulling such part of the Authority’s decision where the fine was quantified. Eni is waiting for the filing of the motivations of the Court decision to ascertain the impact of said decision. Pending this development, the payment of the fine has been voluntarily suspended. In 2007, the Regional Administrative Court of Lazio accepted in part Eni’s claim and cancelled the quantification of the fine based on the Antitrust Authority’s inadequate evaluation of the

144


circumstances presented by Eni. Eni filed an appeal with the Council of State, as did the Antitrust Authority and TTPC. Pending the final outcome, Eni awaits for the determination of the amount of the fine to be paid.

Italian natural gas market. On May 7, 2009, the Italian Antitrust Authority started a preliminary investigation against the Company and its fully-owned subsidiary Italgas and other operators engaging in the gas retail market in Italy. The investigation targets an alleged abuse of dominant position in the gas retail market in Italy associated with commercial practices intended to make it difficult for retail clients to change the supplier and the retrieval of data on volumes.

POLIMERI EUROPA SPA AND SYNDIAL SPA
Inquiries in relation to alleged anti-competitive agreements in the area of elastomers. In December 2002, inquiries were commenced concerning alleged anti-competitive agreements in the field of elastomers. These inquiries were commenced concurrently by European and U.S. authorities. At present, proceedings are pending before the European Commission regarding the CR and NBR products. In March 2007, the Commission sent to Eni, Polimeri Europa and Syndial a statement of objections, thus opening the second phase of this proceeding. In December 2007, the European Commission dismissed Syndial’s position on CR and imposed on Eni and Polimeri a fine amounting to euro 132.16 million. The two companies have filed an appeal with the EU Court of First Instance against this decision and, at the same time, paid the fine in March 2008. Investigations relating to other elastomers products resulted in the ascertainment of Eni having infringed European competition laws in the field of synthetic rubber production (BR and ESBR). On November 29, 2006, the Commission fined Eni and its subsidiary Polimeri Europa for an amount of euro 272.25 million. Eni and its subsidiary filed claims against this decision before the European Court of First Instance in February 2007. The Commission filed a counter appeal. Pending the outcome, Polimeri Europa presented a bank guarantee for euro 200 million and paid the residual amount of the fine. In August 2007, Eni submitted a request for a negative ascertainment with the Court of Milan aimed at proving the non-existence of alleged damages suffered by tire manufacturers. With regard to NBR, an inquiry is underway also in the U.S., where class actions have also been commenced. On the federal level, the class action was abandoned by the plaintiffs. However, the federal judge has yet to acknowledge this abandonment. With regard to other products under investigation in the U.S., settlements were reached with both relevant U.S. antitrust authorities and the plaintiffs acting through a class action. Eni recorded a provision for these matters.

Regulation

TOSCANA ENERGIA CLIENTI SPA
Eni’s subsidiary Toscana Energia Clienti SpA started an action against a customer regarding alleged lack of measurement of gas consumption due to inability to access a measurement facility at the customer’s site, also in connection with the application of Resolution No. 229/2001 of the Italian Authority for Electricity and Gas. This customer has annual consumption in excess of 5,000 CM. The defendant has filed a counter-claim in relation to this proceeding. In the hearing of November 12, 2008 the judge resolved to partially accept the Eni’s subsidiary reasons and to limit compensation to be paid to the defendant to only euro 1,475 with interests amounting to euro 90. The sum was paid while the defendant is evaluating the opportunity to appeal the sentence.

DISTRIBUIDORA DE GAS CUYANA SA
Formal investigation of the agency entrusted with the regulations for the natural gas market in Argentina.Enargas started a formal investigation on some operators, among them Distribuidora de Gas Cuyana SA, a company controlled by Eni. Enargas stated that the company improperly applied conversion factors to volumes of natural gas invoiced to customers and requested the company to apply the conversion factors imposed by local regulations from the date of the default notification (March 31, 2004) without prejudice to any damage payment and fines that may be decided after closing the investigation. In April 2004 the company filed a defensive memorandum. On April 28, 2006, the company formally requested the acquisition of documents from Enargas in order to have access to the documents on which the allegations are based.

Tax Proceedings

ENI SPA
Dispute for the omitted payment of the municipal tax related to oil platforms located in territorial waters in the Adriatic Sea. With a formal assessment presented by the Municipality of Pineto (Teramo) in December 1999, Eni SpA has been accused of not having paid a municipal tax on real estate for the period from 1993 to 1998 on four oil platforms located in the Adriatic Sea which constitute municipal waters in front of the coast of Pineto. Eni was requested to pay a total of approximately euro 17 million including interest and a fine. Eni filed a claim against this request stating that the sea where the platforms are located is not part of the municipal territory and the tax application as requested by the municipality lacked objective fundamentals. The claim has been accepted in the first two degrees of judgment at the Provincial and Regional Tax Commissions. However, the Court overturned both judgments, declaring that a municipality can consider requesting a tax on real estate in the sea facing its territory and with the decision of February 2005 sent the proceeding to another section of the Regional Tax Commission in order

145


to judge on the matters of the proceeding. This commission nominated a Board of Consultants, in order to make all the accounting/technical verifications necessary for the judgment. On December 28, 2005, the Municipality of Pineto presented the same request for the same platforms for the years 1999 to 2004. The total amount requested from Eni is euro 24 million including interest and penalties. Eni filed a claim against this request which was accepted by the first degree judge with a decision of December 4, 2007. Similar formal assessments related to Eni oil and gas offshore platforms were presented by the Municipalities of Falconara Marittima and Pedaso. The total amounts of those claims were approximately euro 6 million. The company filed appeal or is planning to appeal.

AGIP KARACHAGANAK BV
Claims concerning unpaid taxes and relevant payment of interest and penalties. In July 2004, relevant Kazakh Authorities informed Agip Karachaganak BV and Agip Karachaganak Petroleum Operating Co BV, shareholder and operator of the Karachaganak contract, respectively, on the final outcome of 2000 to 2003 tax audits. Both companies counterclaimed against the assessment and a preliminary agreement was reached on November 18, 2004. Final assessments have now been issued by the Kazakh Authorities, and payment has been made. The final amount assessed and paid was $39 million net to Eni; this figure included taxes and interest. The companies continue to dispute the assessments and reserve the right to challenge their findings further.

Court Inquiries

EniPower. In June 2004, the Milan Public Prosecutor commenced inquiries into contracts awarded by Eni’s subsidiary EniPower and on supplies from other companies to EniPower. These inquiries were widely covered by the media. It emerged that illicit payments were made by EniPower suppliers to a manager of EniPower who was immediately dismissed. The Court presented EniPower (commissioning entity) and Snamprogetti (contractor of engineering and procurement services) with notices of process in accordance with existing laws regulating the administrative responsibility of companies (Legislative Decree No. 231/2001). In its meeting of August 10, 2004, Eni’s Board of Directors examined the aforementioned situation and Eni’s CEO approved the creation of a task force in charge of verifying the compliance with Group procedures regarding the terms and conditions for the signing of supply contracts by EniPower and Snamprogetti and the subsequent execution of works. The Board also advised divisions and departments of Eni to cooperate fully in every respect with the Court. From the inquiries performed, no default in the organization emerged, nor deficiency in internal control systems. External experts have performed inquiries with regard to certain specific aspects. In accordance with its transparency and firmness guidelines, Eni will take the necessary steps in acting as plaintiff in the expected legal action in order to recover any damage that could have been caused to Eni by the illicit behavior of its suppliers and of their and Eni employees. In the meantime, preliminary investigations have found that both EniPower and Snamprogetti are not to be considered defendants in accordance with existing laws regulating the administrative responsibility of companies (Legislative Decree No. 231/2001). In August 2007, Eni was notified that the Public Prosecutor requested the dismissal of EniPower SpA and Snamprogetti SpA, while the proceeding continues against former employees of these companies and employees and managers of the suppliers under the provisions of Legislative Decree No. 231/2001. Eni SpA, EniPower and Snamprogetti presented themselves as plaintiffs.

Trading. An investigation is pending regarding two former Eni managers who were allegedly bribed by third parties to favor the closing of certain transactions with two oil product trading companies. Within such investigation, on March 10, 2005, the public prosecutor of Rome notified Eni of two judicial measures for the seizure of documentation concerning Eni’s transactions with the said companies. Eni is acting as plaintiff in this proceeding. The judge for preliminary hearings rejected most of the dismissal request, forcing the public prosecutor to continue with the criminal case.

TSKJ Consortium Investigations of the SEC and other Authorities. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ), and other authorities are investigating alleged improper payments made by the TSKJ Consortium to certain Nigerian public officials in relation to the construction of natural gas liquefaction facilities at Bonny Island in Nigeria. Snamprogetti Netherlands BV had a 25% participation in the TSKJ companies, with the remaining participations held by subsidiaries of Halliburton/KBR, Technip, and JGC. Snamprogetti SpA, the holding company of Snamprogetti Netherlands BV, was a wholly owned subsidiary of Eni until February 2006, when an agreement was entered into for the sale of Snamprogetti to Saipem SpA and Snamprogetti was merged into Saipem as of October 1, 2008. Eni holds a 43% participation in Saipem. In connection with the sale of Snamprogetti to Saipem, Eni agreed to indemnify Saipem for a variety of matters, including potential losses resulting from the investigations into the TSKJ matter. In February 2009, KBR and its former parent company, Halliburton, announced that they had reached a settlement with the SEC and DoJ with respect to the TSKJ matter as well as other unspecified matters. In connection with the settlement, KBR pleaded guilty to Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) charges stemming from the TSKJ matter. KBR and Halliburton also agreed to pay a substantial fine and entered into civil settlements with the SEC. We understand that the DoJ and the SEC believe that representatives of the other members of the TSKJ Consortium were involved in the conduct that gave rise to the FCPA charges against KBR. Since June 2004, Eni and Saipem/Snamprogetti have been in discussions with, and have provided information in response to requests by, various regulators, including the SEC, the DoJ and the Public Prosecutor’s office of Milan, in connection with the investigations.

146


Gas Metering. On May 28, 2007, a seizure order (in respect to certain documentation) was served upon Eni and other Group companies as part of a proceeding brought by the Public Prosecutor at the Courts of Milan. The order was also served upon five top managers of the Group companies in addition to third party companies and their top managers. The investigation alleges behavior which breaches Italian criminal law, starting from 2003, regarding the use of instruments for measuring gas, the related payments of excise duties and the billing of clients as well as relations with the Supervisory Authorities. The allegation regards, interalia, the offense contemplated by Legislative Decree of June 8, 2001, No. 231, which establishes the liability of the legal entity for crimes committed by its employee in the interests of such legal entity, or to its advantage. Accordingly, notice of the commencement of investigations was served upon Eni Group companies (Eni, Snam Rete Gas and Italgas) as well as third party companies. The Group companies are cooperating with the Supervising Authorities in the investigations.

Agip KCO NV. In November 2007, the public prosecutor of Kazakhstan informed Agip KCO of the start of an inquiry for an alleged fraud in the award of a contract to the Overseas International Constructors GmbH in 2005.

Settled Proceedings

ENI SPA
Inquiry of the Italian Authority for Electricity and Gas regarding information to clients about the right to pay amounts due for natural gas sales in installments. With Decision No. 228/2007, the Italian Authority for Electricity and Gas commenced a formal inquiry regarding information to clients about the right to pay amounts due for the natural gas sales in installments in order to possibly put a stop to the alleged infringement of the clients’ rights and to impose a fine. In April 2008, the Authority concluded its inquiry and fined the Company by euro 3.2 million.

SYNDIAL SPA (FORMER ENICHEM SPA)
Criminal action commenced by the public prosecutor of Brindisi. In 2000, the public prosecutor of Brindisi commenced a criminal action against 68 persons who are employees or former employees of companies that owned and managed plants for the manufacture of dichloroethane, vinyl chloride monomer and vinyl polychloride from the early 1960s to date, some of which were managed by EniChem from 1983 to 1993. At the end of the preliminary investigation the public prosecutor asked for the dismissal of the case in respect of the employees and the managers of EniChem. Plaintiffs presented oppositions, but the prosecutor confirmed the request to dismiss the case with a decision of June 2008, the public prosecutor dismissed the accusation as unfounded and requested the closing of the proceeding.

AGIP KCO NV
In December 2007 the Kazakh tax authority filed a notice of tax assessment for fiscal years 2004 to 2006 to Agip KCO, operator of the Kashagan contract. Allegedly unpaid taxes, including interest and penalties, amounted to approximately U.S. $235 million net to Eni and related to unpaid amounts and inapplicable deductions on value added tax and the default in applying certain withholding taxes on payments to foreign suppliers. The same notice also informed the companies party to the Kashagan contract that further assessments were pending on non-deductible costs for U.S. $188 million net Eni and higher taxable income on Kazakh branches for U.S. $48 million net to Eni. The further assessments were subsequently issued, the company filed an appeal and a settlement was reached in October 2008 with the following outcome: the unpaid taxes net to Eni were agreed at U.S. $24 million (U.S. $235 million assessed). An adjustment to deductible costs was agreed at U.S. $38 million net to Eni (U.S. $188 million assessed) and it was further agreed that there would be no income taxable on Kazakh branches (U.S. $48 million assessed).Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Dividends

Eni’s dividend policy in future periods, and the sustainability of the current amount of dividends over the next four-year period, will depend upon a number of factors including future levels of profitability and cash flow provided by operating activities, a sound balance sheet structure, capital expenditures and development plans, in light of the "Risk Factors"“Risk Factors” set out in Item 3. The parent Company’s net profit and, therefore, the amounts of earnings available for the payment of dividends will also depend on the level of dividends received from Eni’s subsidiaries. However, subject to such factors, inunder the Company’s scenario for Brent prices at 65 $/BBL flat over the next four-year periodfour years, management intendsplans to pursuepay a dividend policy designedper share for the year 2010 which will be in line with 2009 at euro 1.00 per share. In the subsequent years of the industrial plan 2010-2013 as approved by the Board, the dividend per share is anticipated to ensure competitivegrow in line with OECD inflation. If management assumptions on oil prices were to change, management may rebase the dividend.

Management intend to propose to the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting scheduled on April 29, 2010, the distribution of a dividend yields to Eni’s shareholders. On April 30, 2009, Eni’s Shareholders' Meeting approved a dividend,of euro 1.00 per share for fiscal year 2008, of euro 1.30 per share,2009, of which euro 0.65 per share0.50 was already paid in September 2008 as an interim dividend with the balance of euro 0.65 per share to be paid late in MaySeptember 2009. Total cash outlay for the 20082009 dividend is expected at approximately euro 4.73.6 billion (including the euro 2.361.8 billion already paid in September 2008).2009) in case the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting approves the annual dividend. In future years, management expects to continue paying interim dividends for each fiscal year, with the balance to the full year dividend to be paid in each following year.

147


Significant Changes

See "Item 5 – Recent developments"Developments" for a discussion of significant events occurred after 20082009 year-end up to the latest practicable date, including a review of Eni’s performance in the first quarter of 2009, the exercise by Gazprom of the call option to purchase the 20% interest in the Russian company OAO Gazprom Neft held by Eni, the divestment of 100% of Italgas SpA and Stoccaggi Gas Italia SpA to Snam Rete Gas and the finalization of the mandatory tender offer on the minority shareholders of Distrigas.date.

 

 

Item 9. THE OFFER AND THE LISTING

Offer and Listing Details

The principal trading market for the ordinary shares of Eni SpA ("Eni"), nominal value euro 1.00 each (the "Shares"), is the Mercato Telematico Azionario or MTA ("Telematico"), the Italian regulated electronic share market,. Telematico, which is the principal trading market for shares in Italy.Italy, is a regulated market organized and managed by Borsa Italiana SpA ("Borsa Italiana"). The Shares are traded on the Blue Chip segment of Telematico, which includes shares of the companies whose market capitalization amounts to more than euro 1,000 million. American Depositary Receipts ("ADRs"), each representing two shares,Shares, are listed on the New York Stock Exchange. The ratio has changed from one ADR per five Shares to one ADR per two Shares, effective January 10, 2006.

146


The table below sets forth the reported high and low reference prices of Shares on Telematico and of ADRs on the New York Stock Exchange, respectively. Due to the ratio change, the historical prices of ADRs have been adjusted by an adjustment factor of 2.5. See "Item 3 – Key Information – Exchange Rates" regarding applicable exchange rates during the periods indicated below.

 

Telematico

 

New York
Stock Exchange

 
 
 

High

 

Low

 

High

 

Low

 
 
 
 
 

(euro per share)

 

(U.S. $ per ADR)

2003 15.746 11.881 37.992 26.460
2004 18.748 14.723 50.580 36.940
2005 24.960 17.930 60.540 47.400
2006 25.730 21.820 67.690 54.650
2007 28.330 22.760 78.290 60.220
2008 26.930 13.798 84.140 37.220
         
2007        
First quarter 25.720 22.760 66.720 60.220
Second quarter 27.150 24.130 72.840 64.710
Third quarter 28.330 23.310 78.290 63.160
Fourth quarter 26.680 23.320 75.660 67.220
         
2008        
First quarter 25.580 20.870 75.130 61.790
Second quarter 26.930 21.820 84.140 68.570
Third quarter 23.450 18.263 73.930 51.410
Fourth quarter 19.350 13.798 52.600 37.220
         
2009        
First quarter 17.830 12.300 49.440 31.070
January 2009 17.830 16.210 49.440 42.390
February 2009 17.630 15.740 45.690 39.200
March 2009 15.240 12.300 41.380 31.070
April 2009 16.450 14.510 43.010 37.240
May 2009 (through May 4, 2009) 16.930 16.930 45.550 44.040




2004 18.748 14.723 50.580 36.940
2005 24.960 17.930 60.540 47.400
2006 25.730 21.820 67.690 54.650
2007 28.330 22.760 78.290 60.220
2008 26.930 13.798 84.140 37.220
2009 18.350 12.300 54.450 31.070
2008        
First quarter 25.580 20.870 75.130 61.790
Second quarter 26.930 21.820 84.140 68.570
Third quarter 23.450 18.263 73.930 51.410
Fourth quarter 19.350 13.798 52.600 37.220
2009        
First quarter 17.830 12.300 49.440 31.070
Second quarter 18.350 14.510 51.800 37.240
Third quarter 17.700 15.860 52.100 44.400
Fourth quarter 18.220 16.500 54.450 48.660
October 2009 18.220 16.730 54.450 48.660
November 2009 17.540 16.500 52.450 49.740
December 2009 17.870 16.690 51.380 48.720
2010        
First quarter 18.560 16.010 53.890 43.950
January 2010 18.560 16.710 53.890 46.520
February 2010 17.110 16.010 47.910 43.950
March 2010 (through March 29, 2010) 17.870 16.840 48.710 45.680
  
 
 
 

JPMorgan Chase Bank NA (the "Depositary") functions as depositary bank issuing ADRs pursuant to the Deposit Agreement among Eni, the Depositary and the beneficial owners ("Beneficial Owners") and registered holders from time to time of ADRs issued thereunder.hereunder.

At May 4, 2009As of March 29, 2010 there were 44,072,28236,275,119 ADRs outstanding, representing 88,144,56472,550,238 ordinary shares or 2.2%2% of all Eni’s shares outstanding, held by 107113 holders of record (including the Depository Trust Company) in the United

148


States of America, 105111 of which are U.S. residents. Since certain of such ADRs are held by nominees, the number of holders may not be representative of the number of Beneficial Owners in the United States or elsewhere.

The Shares are included in the S&P/FTSE MIB Index (the "FTSE MIB"), the primary benchmark index for the Italian stock exchange index thatmarket. Capturing approximately 80% of the domestic market capitalization, the FTSE MIB measures the performance of the 40 highly liquid, leading companies inacross leading industries listed on Telematico and seeks to replicate the markets organized and managed by Borsa Italiana SpA ("Borsa Italiana").broad sector weights of the Italian stock market. The constituents of the S&P/FTSE MIB are selected according to the following criteria: sector representation, market capitalization of free-float shares and liquidity. The FTSE MIB is market cap-weighted after adjusting constituents for float. Since September 20, 2004June 1, 2009 the FTSE MIB (previously S&P/MIB Index) is the principal indicator used to track the performance of the Italian stock market and is the basis for future and option contracts traded in the Italian Derivatives Market ("IDEM") managed by Borsa Italiana. Eni’s Shares are the second largest component of the S&P/FTSE MIB after UniCredit, with a weighting of approximately 14.7%.14.9%, as established by Standard & Poor’s and Borsa ItalianaFTSE after the quarterly rebalancing for S&P/FTSE MIB effective March 23, 2009.22, 2010.

Trading in the Telematico is allowed in any quantity of shares or other financial instruments. Where necessary, Borsa Italiana may specify a minimum lot for each financial instrument. Since March 28, 2000, a three-day rolling cash settlement has been applied to all trades of equity securities in Italy, instead of the previous five-day settlement. Starting from May 15, 2000, the Shares have been also trading on a special market, named After Hours trading market or TAH ("After Hours"), after the closure of the day time of Telematico under special rules. In addition, future and option contracts on the Shares are traded on IDEM and securitized derivatives based on the

147


Shares are traded on the Italian Securitized Derivatives Market ("SeDeX"). IDEM facilitates the trading of future and option contracts on index and shares issued by companies that meet certain required capitalization and liquidity thresholds. SeDeX is the Borsa Italiana electronic regulated market where it is possible to trade securitized derivatives (covered warrants and certificates). Outside Regulated Markets, block trading is permitted for orders that meet certain minimum size requirements and must be notified to Consob and Borsa Italiana.

Markets

Telematico is organizedBorsa Italiana disseminates daily market data and administerednews for each listed security, including volume traded and high and low prices. At the end of each trading day an "official price", calculated as the weighted average price of the total volume of each security traded in the market during the session, and a "reference price", calculated as the closing-auction price, are reported by Borsa Italiana subject to the supervision and control of the Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (the National Commission for Companies and the Stock Exchange or "Consob"), the public authority charged, interalia, with regulating the Italian securities market to ensure the transparency and regularity of the dealings and protect investors. Borsa Italiana is a joint stock company (Società per Azioni) that was established to manage the Italian regulated financial markets (including Telematico) as part of the implementation in Italy of the EU Investment Services Directive ("ISD"). Borsa Italiana has issued rules governing the organization and management of the Italian Regulated Markets it regulates, which are Telematico (shares, convertible bonds, pre-emptive rights, warrants, and Funds), After Hours, Mercato Expandi (small companies), ETFplus (Exchange Traded Funds and Exchange Traded Commodities market), IDEM (index and stock derivatives market), SeDeX (covered warrants and certificates), and MOT (bond market), as well as the admission to listing on and trading on these markets. Borsa Italiana is part of the London Stock Exchange Group, following the agreement signed in June 2007.

Italiana. For the purposes of the automatic control of the regularity of trading on Telematico, the following price variation limits shall apply to contracts concluded on shares making up the S&P/MIB:FTSE MIB, effective December 10, 2009: (i) ± 7.5%5.0% (or such other amount established by Borsa Italiana in the "Guide to the Parameters" for trading on the regulated markets organized and managed by Borsa Italiana) with respect to the static price (the static price shall be the previous day’s reference price, in the opening auction, or the auction price, in the continuous trading phase); and (ii) ± 3.5% (or such other amount established by Borsa Italiana)Italiana in the "Guide to the Parameters") with respect to the dynamic price (the price of the last contract concluded during the continuous trading phase). The reference price is the closing-auction price. Where the price of a contract that is being concluded exceeds one of the price variation limits referred to above, trading in that security will be automatically suspended and a volatility auction phase begun for a certain period of time.

Effective November

Markets

The Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (the National Commission for Companies and the Stock Exchange or "Consob"), is the public authority responsible for regulating and supervising the Italian securities markets to ensure the transparency and regularity of the dealings and protect the investing public. Borsa Italiana, which is part of London Stock Exchange Group, following the merger effective October 1, 2007, followingis a joint stock company authorized by Consob to operate regulated markets in Italy; it is responsible for the national implementationorganization and management of the Italian stock exchange. One of the fundamental characteristics of the financial market organization in Italy is the separation of responsibility for supervision (Consob and the Bank of Italy) from that of market management (Borsa Italiana). Main responsibilities of Borsa Italiana are: to oversee transaction activities; to define the rules and procedures for admission and listing on the market for issuing companies; to define the rules and procedures for admission for intermediaries.

According to Consob Regulations, Borsa Italiana has issued rules governing the organization and management of the Italian Regulated Markets it is responsible for, which are Telematico (shares, convertible bonds, pre-emptive rights, warrants, and Funds), TAH (After Hours trading market), ETFplus (Exchange Traded Funds and Exchange Traded Commodities market), IDEM (index and stock derivatives market), SeDeX (covered warrants and certificates), MOT (bond market), and MIV (Investment Vehicles Market), as well as the admission to listing on and trading on these markets.

According to EU Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (2004/39/EC) ("MiFID"), the so called ’concentration rule’ has been superseded. The MiFID, that replaces the ISD, establishes the legal framework governing investment services and financial markets in Europe. With the new regulatory regime of MiFID,Consob Regulations, orders can be routed not only to Regulated Markets but also to either Multilateral Trading Facilities ("MTF"s) or Systematic Internalisers. An MTF is a multilateral system, operated by an investment firm or a market operator, which brings together multiple third-party buying and selling interests in financial instruments – in the system and in accordance with non-discretionary rules – in a way that results in a contract. A Systematic Internaliser is an investment firm or a bank which deals on own account by executing client orders outside a Regulated Market or an MTF.

Italian exchanges and securities are primarily regulated byAccording to Legislative Decree No. 58 of February 24, 1998 ("Decree No. 58"). According to Decree No. 58,, the consolidated law on financial intermediaries, the provision of investment services and activities to the public on a professional basis is reserved to banks and investment firms ("intermediaries"), which are firms authorized persons"). The Bank of Italy and Consob shall exercise supervisory powers over authorized persons. They shall each supervise the observance of regulatory and legislative provisions according to provide investment services or activities.their respective responsibilities. In addition, banks and investment firms organizedparticular, in a member nationconnection with the pursuance of the EU are permitted to operatesafeguarding of faith in Italy provided that the intentfinancial system, the protection of investors, the stability and correct operation of the bank or investment firm to operate in Italy is communicated to Consob byfinancial system, the competent authoritycompetitiveness of the member state. Non-EU banksfinancial system and non-EU investment

149


firms may operate in Italy subject to the specific authorizationobservance of Consob, in agreement with the Bank of Italy. Pursuant to Decree No. 58, Consob shall be responsible for the transparency and correctness of conduct of intermediaries andfinancial provisions, the Bank of Italy shall be responsible for risk containment, asset stability and the sound and prudent management of intermediaries. intermediaries whilst Consob shall be responsible for the transparency and correctness of conduct.

The Bank of Italy, in agreement with Consob, also regulates the operation of the clearing and settlement service for transactions involving financial instruments. The regulations and measures of general application adopted by Consob and the Bank of Italy are available on the website of Consob (www.consob.it) or Bank of Italy (www.bancaditalia.it). The regulations adopted by Borsa Italiana are available on its website (www.borsaitaliana.it).

148


Item 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Memorandum and Articles of Association

The full text of the memorandum and articles of association of Register office

"Eni is attached as an exhibit to this annual report. See "Exhibit 1".

Eni is incorporated under the name "Eni SpA" resultingresults from the transformationprivatization of Ente Nazionale Idrocarburi, a public law agency, established by Law No. 136 of February 10, 1953. 1953 and it is registered at the Rome Companies Register, with identification number (and Tax number) 00484960588, and Vat number 0090581106.

The full text of Eni’s By-Laws is attached as an exhibit to this annual report (last amended on March 25, 2009). See "Exhibit 1".

Company objects and purpose

According to Article 4 of Eni’s By-Laws, Company’s purpose is the direct and/or indirectobjects include: management by way of shareholdings in companies, agencies or businesses, of activities in the field of hydrocarbons and natural vapors, such as exploration and development of hydrocarbon fields, construction and operation of pipelines for transporting the same, processing, transformation, storage, utilization and trade of hydrocarbons and natural vapors, all in compliance withrespect of concessions requiredprovided by law.

The Company also has the purpose of direct and/or indirectlaw; management by way of shareholdings in companies, agencies or businesses, of activities in the fields of chemicals, nuclear fuels, geothermygeothermal and renewable energy sources, in the sector ofindustrial plant construction and engineering, and construction of industrial plants, in the mining, sector, in the metallurgy, sector, in the textile machinery, sector, in the water sector, including derivation, drinking water, purification distribution and reuse of waters; in the sector ofdistribution, environmental protection and treatment and disposal of waste, as well as in everyany other business activity that is instrumental, supplemental or complementary with the aforementioned activities.

The Company also has the purpose of managingmanages the technical and financial co-ordination of subsidiaries and affiliated companies as well as providing financial assistance on their behalf.

The Company may perform any operations necessary or useful forcompanies. Moreover, the achievement of its purpose; by way of example, it may initiate operations involving real estate, moveable goods, trade and commerce, industry, finance and banking asset and liability operations, as well as any action that is in any way connected with the Company purpose with the exception of public fund raising and the performance of investment services as regulated by Decree No. 58 of February 24, 1998.

The Company may take shareholdings and interests in other companies or businessesbusiness with objects similar, comparable or complementary to its own or those of companies in which it has holdings, either in Italy or abroad, and it may provide real and or personal bonds for its own and others’ obligations, especially guarantees.

 

DirectorsDirectors’ issues

The Eni Board of Directors is invested with the fullest powers for ordinary and extraordinary management of the Company and, in particular, the Board has the power to perform all acts it deems advisable for the implementation and achievement of the Company purpose, except for the acts that the law or Eni’s By-lawsBy-Laws reserve to the Shareholders’ Meeting. The Board of Directors has appointed a Chief Executive Officer and delegated to him all necessary powers for the administration of the Company, with the exception of those powers that cannot be delegated in accordance with current legislation and those retained exclusively by the Board onof Directors on the matters regarding major strategic, operational and organizational decisions.

ForAccording with Eni’s By-Laws, a complete descriptionmajority of members having a voting right must be present for a Board meeting to be valid. Board’s resolutions are taken with the majority of votes of the powersmembers (with voting rights) present at the meeting; votes are equal, the person who chairs the meeting has a casting vote.

Interests in Company’s transactions

As provided by Italian Civil Code, when a Director retains a personal interest or an interest on behalf of third parties in Company’s transactions, he shall disclose it to the others (as well as to the Board of Statutory Auditors), specifying the nature, terms, origin and extent of such interest. Based on this provision and in compliance with the provisions of the Eni Corporate Governance Code, the Board of Directors – in its decision of February 12, 2009 and with the CEOopinion of the Internal Control Committee – has adopted a specific policy ("Guidelines on transactions involving interests of Directors or Statutory Auditors and related parties transactions"), to detail the above mentioned disclosure obligations (extending them to the Statutory Auditors). According to these Guidelines Directors involved in matters subject to the Board resolution normally shall not participate in the correspondent discussion and decision and shall leave the room during these procedures. If the person involved is the Chief Executive Officer and the Chairman, appointments, roletransaction is under his jurisdiction, he shall in any case abstain from taking part in the transaction and shall entrust the matter to the Board of Directors (as provided by Article 2391 of the BoardCivil Code). Moreover, to ensure compliance with the preliminary and rulesauthorizing procedures described, Eni’s Directors and proceduresStatutory Auditors shall periodically issue a statement representing the potential interests each one of them has with respect to the Company and the Group, and in any case they shall promptly notify the Chief Executive Officer (or the Chairman, if the matter concerns the latter’s interest) – who shall inform the other Directors and the Statutory Auditors – of the meetingsindividual transactions that the Company intends to perform, in which they have an interest.

149


Compensation

Directors’ compensation is determined by the Shareholders Meeting, as required by Italian civil law, while compensation of Directors invested with particular powers (such as the Chairman and the CEO) is determined by the Board of the Directors, on proposal of the Compensation Committee after consultation with the Board of Statutory Auditors (for more details about compensation policy in 2009, see "Item 6 – Board Practices"Compensation").

Borrowing powers

Borrowing powers exercisable by directors are included in the Company purpose. Moreover, according to the Article 11 of the By-Laws, the Company may issue bonds, including convertibles and warrant bonds in compliance with the law.

Retirement and shareholdings

There are no provisions asin the By-Laws relating both to the retirement based on age-limit requirements and the number of shares required for director’s qualification.

Company’s shares

According to Article 5 of the By-Laws, the Company’s share capital amounts to euro 4,005,358,876, fully paid, and is represented by 4,005,358,876 ordinary nominative shares with a nominal value of euro 1 (one) each. As required by Italian legislation on dematerialization of financial instruments, Eni’s shares must be held with "Monte Titoli" (the Italian Central Depository for financial instrument) and their beneficial owners may exercise their rights through special deposit accounts opened with authorized intermediaries, such as banks, brokers and securities dealers.

Shares are indivisible and each share is entitled to one vote. Shareholders are allowed to vote at ordinary and extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting, also through proxy or requirementmail.

Moreover, according to Article 9 of the By-Laws, the Shareholders’ Meeting might resolve to increase the Company capital by issuing shares, including shares of different classes, to be assigned for no consideration to Eni’s employees, pursuant to Article 2349 of the Italian Civil Code. This faculty has not been exercised.

In 1995, Eni established a sponsored ADR (American Depositary Receipts) program directed to U.S. investors. Each of Eni’s ADR is equal to two of Eni’s ordinary shares; Eni’s ADR are listed on the New York Stock Exchange.

Dividend rights

Shareholders have the right to participate in profits and any other right as provided by the law and subject to any applicable legal limitations: in particular, the ordinary Shareholders’ Meeting called for the approval of the annual financial statements may allocate the net income resulting after the allotment to the legal reserve, to the payment of a final dividend per share. In addition, during the course of the financial year, the Board of Directors has the faculty, as allowed by the By-Laws, to pay interim dividends to the shareholders. Dividends not collected within five years from the day in which they are payable will be prescribed in favor of the Company and allocated to reserves.

Voting rights

The general provisions on the shares' "voting rights" are described at the point 6 below. In relation to the appointment of the Board of Directors (Eni’s Board is not a "staggered board") and the Board of Statutory Auditors (see Item 6) the By-Laws provide a voting list system. In particular, pursuant to Article 17 of the By-Laws and according to the provisions of Law No. 474/1994, lists may be presented both by shareholders, either individually or together with others, representing at least 1% of the share ownershipcapital, or by the Board of Directors. Each shareholder may present or contribute towards presenting, and vote for, a director’s qualificationsingle list.

150


There are no provisions in Eni’s By-laws.By-Laws relating to: rights to share in the Company’s profits; redemption provisions; sinking fund provisions; liability to further capital calls by the Company.

150

Liquidation rights

In case of liquidation of the Company, the Shareholders’ Meeting would appoint one or more liquidators and determine their powers and remuneration. According to the Italian law, shareholders would be entitled to the distribution of the remaining liquidated assets of the Company in proportion to the nominal value of their shares, only after payments of all Company’s liabilities and satisfaction of all other creditors.

Change in shareholders’ rights

To change the rights of holders of the stocks is necessary a shareholders’ resolution. In case of any modification of the By-Laws provisions relating to voting and dividend rights, resolved by the Shareholders’ Meeting, with the attendance and decision quorum established by the law for extraordinary meetings, shareholders are entitled with a withdrawal right, provided by the Italian Law.

Shareholders’ Meeting

The Shareholders’ Meeting resolves on the issues set forth applicable law and Eni’s By-Laws, in "ordinary" or "extraordinary" form. In particular, an ordinary meeting appoints and revokes Directors and Statutory Auditors, approves financial statements within 120 days from the end of each financial year (December 31), while an extraordinary meeting approves amendments in By-Laws14 and extraordinary transactions, such as capital increases, mergers and demergers.

The notice of a Shareholders’ Meeting may specify two meeting dates ("calls") for ordinary meetings and three or more calls for extraordinary Shareholders’ meetings. The attendance quorum for an ordinary meeting on first call is at least 50% of the outstanding ordinary shares, while on second call there is no attendance quorum requirement. In both first and second calls, resolutions may be approved by a simple majority of the shares represented at the meeting. The attendance quorum required for an extraordinary meeting is at least 50% of the company’s share capital on first call, or more than 1/3 or at least 1/5 of the company’s share capital, on second call and the following calls, respectively. On first, second and following calls, resolutions may be approved by a majority of 2/3 of the shares represented at the Shareholders’ Meeting.

Shareholders’ Meetings are usually held at the Company registered office unless otherwise resolved by the Board of Directors, provided however they are held in Italy.

With the aim of facilitating the attendance of shareholders, according to law and Article 13 of the By-Laws, calls for meetings are published, at least 30 days before the date fixed for the meeting on first call, in the Gazzetta Ufficiale of the Italian Republic, and in the newspapers "Il Sole 24 Ore", "Corriere della Sera" and "Financial Times". The notice, which reports the conditions of admission requested by the By-Laws, is filed with Borsa Italiana and published on the Company website. Admission to the Shareholders’ Meeting is granted to shareholders who deliver the communication issued by financial intermediaries, according to applicable laws, at least two business days prior to the date of the meeting. The communication can be withdrawn, through the financial intermediaries: in this case shareholders lose the right to participate. Shareholders may also attend the meeting by proxy and vote by mail, as allowed by Article 13 and 14 of Eni’s By-Laws. Vote by mail can be revoked by express communication sent to the Company at least one day before the meeting. In order to attend the meeting, legal or voluntary representatives of shareholders shall present the documentation confirming their power to the proper office of the Company according to the dates and forms indicated in the call for the meeting. In addition, as provided by Article 14 of Eni’s By-Laws, in order to simplify the collection of proxies issued by shareholders who are also employees of Eni and Group companies and members of associations of shareholders, that comply with current regulations, Eni provides areas for communicating and collecting proxies.

Meetings are regulated by the "Eni’s Shareholders’ Meeting Regulation" approved by the ordinary Shareholders’ Meeting of Eni on December 4, 1998, in order to guarantee an efficient development of meetings and the right of each shareholder to express his opinion on the items in the agenda.


(14)With the exception of such amendments resolved to merely adequate the By-Laws provisions to law, which can be deliberated by the Board of Directors.

151


During Shareholders’ Meetings, the Board of Directors provides wide disclosure on items examined and shareholders can require information on issues in the agenda. Information is provided taking account of applicable rules on inside information.

Stock ownership limitation and voting rights restrictions

General

There are no limitations imposed by Italian law or by the Eni’s By-lawsBy-Laws on the rights of non-residents ofin Italy or foreign persons to hold shares or vote the shares other than the limitations described below (which are equally applicable to residents and non-residents ofin Italy).

In accordance with Article 6 of Eni’s By-lawsthe By-Laws, and in accordance withapplying the special provision ofrules pursuant to Article 3 of Law Decree No. 332/1994, as converted into Law No. 474/1994 ("Law No. 474 of 1994")1994 (Law No. 474/1994), under no shareholder can directlycircumstances may any party own shares in the Company which constitute a direct or indirectlyindirect shareholding of more than 3% of the share capital. Exceeding this limit results in a ban on exercising the voting rights and other rights, except for the right to partecipate in profits, relative to any shareholding that exceeds the limit.

Pursuant to Article 32 of the By-Laws and the same laws mentioned above, shareholdings owned by the Ministry of the Economy and Finance, public bodies or organization controlled by them are exempt from this ban.

Finally, this special rule provides that the clause regarding shareholding limits will lose effect if the limit is exceeded as a result of a take-over bid, provided that, as a result of the takeover, the bidder will own a shareholding higher than 3% of Eni’s share capital. This limitation does not apply to shares held by the State, the Public Entities or entities controlled by them. The law states in addition that this limitation is waived in case of a public offer to buy Eni’s shares whereby the bidder will hold at least the 75% of the share capital givingwith the right to vote on resolutions concerning the appointment or revocationdismissal of Directors.

Limitation on changes in control of the Board of Directors.

Such maximum limit at 3% is calculated taking into account the aggregate shareholding of a controlling entity, whether an individual or a legal entity (each a "person"); its directly or indirectly controlled entities, as well as entities controlled by the same controlling entity; affiliated entities, as well as relatives within the second degree by blood or marriage (except for a legally separated spouse).

Control exists with reference also to entities other than companies in the cases envisaged by in the cases envisaged by Article 2359, paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Civil Code. Affiliation exists as set forth in applicable Italian legislation, as well as between entities that, directly or indirectly, through controlled entities (other than those managing investment funds) are bound, even with third parties, by agreements relating to the exercise of voting rights or the transfer of shares or interests in third-party companies or other agreements relating to third-party companies as specified by applicable Italian legislation if such agreements relate to at least 10% of the voting share capital of a listed company or 20% of the voting share capital of a non-listed company. For purposes of calculating the 3% limit, shares held through a fiduciary nominee or a broker are taken into account.

Any voting rights attributable to shares held or controlled in excess of such 3% limit cannot be exercised, and the voting rights of each entity to whom such limit on shareholding applies are reduced proportionately, unless otherwise jointly disposed of in advance by the parties involved. In the event that shares exceeding this limit are voted, any shareholders’ resolution adopted pursuant to such a vote may be challenged if the majority required to approve such resolution would not have been reached without the vote of the shares exceeding such maximum limit. Shares not entitled to be voted are nevertheless counted for the purpose of determining the quorum at a Shareholders’ Meeting.

For other limitations that may affect voting rights, see "– Reporting Requirements and Restrictions on Acquisitions of Shares".

SpecialCompany (Special Powers of the Italian StateState)

Under Italian laws,Pursuant to Article 6.2 of the Italian State, acting throughBy-Laws and to the Ministerspecial rules set out in Law No. 474/1994, the Ministry of Economy and Finance, in agreement with the MinisterMinistry of Economic Development, (the "Ministers"), holds certain special powers in connection with any transfer of a controlling interest in certain State-owned companies operating in public service sectors, including Eni. The law places no limit on the duration of such special powers. Such powers are tothat can be exercised in accordance with specific criteria provided for by the regulation and EU principles.

Article 6.2 of Eni’s By-laws, in accordance with the special law referred to as Law No. 474 of 1994, attribute to the Minister of Economy and Finance, in agreement with the Minister of Economic Development, the following special powers to be used in compliance with the criteria indicatedset out in the Prime Ministerial Decree of the President of the Council of Ministers of June 10, 2004 and, synthetically:2004.

These special powers are briefly the following:

(a) opposition with respectobjection to the acquisitionpurchase, by parties who are subject to the shareholding limit, of materialsignificant shareholdings, representingi.e. shareholdings that represent at least 3% of the Eni’s share capital havingand consist of shares with the right to vote atin ordinary Shareholders’ Meeting by entities subject to such ownership limitations pursuant to Article 6.1. Such oppositionMeetings. The objection, duly justified, must be expressed if the transaction is requireddeemed to be duly motivated and expressedprejudicial to the vital interests of the State, within 10ten days of the date of the noticenotification which Directors are required to be filed by the Board of Directors at the timesend when a request is made for registration in the Shareholders’ register whenof shareholders. During the transaction is considered prejudicialperiod of time allowed for the right of objection to vital interests of the State. Until the ten-day term as expired,be exercised, the voting rights and other rights, except for the non-asset linked rightsright to partecipate in profits, connected with the shares representingthat represent the materialsignificant shareholding should not be exercised. Ifremain suspended. In the opposition power isevent of the right of objection being exercised, by means of a duly motivated act in connection withjustified decision based on the prejudice that may beactual prejudicial effect caused by the operationtransaction to the vital interests of the Italian State, the purchaser can not exercise theassignee will be forbidden from exercising its voting rights and theany rights other non-asset linkedthan property rights connected with the shares representingthat represent the materialsignificant shareholding, and must sell the relevantwill be required to assign these same shares within one year. IfIn the purchase failsevent of a failure to comply, the law court, uponCourt, at the request of the MinisterMinistry of Economy and Finance, will order the sale of the shares representing a materialthe significant shareholding according to the procedures set forthout in Article 2359-ter of the Civil Code;

151


(b) opposition with respectobjection to the subscriptionsigning of shareholders’ agreements, or other arrangements (asas defined byin Article 122 of the TUF) wherebyConsolidated Law on Finance, in the event that at least 3% or more of the share capital consisting of Eni havingshares with the right to vote atin ordinary Shareholders’ Meetings is involved. In exercising this opposition power,represented in the public authority responsible for regulating Italian securities and exchanges (Consob) communicatesagreements. For the purpose of allowing the right of objection to be exercised, Consob will inform the MinisterMinistry of the Economy and Finance of any significant shareholders’ agreementagreements of which it has been notified in accordance withunder the terms of the aforementioned Article 122 of the TUF.Consolidated Law on Finance. The opposition power mayright of objection must be exercised within ten days as of the date of Consob’s notification. During the notice by Consob. Untilperiod of time allowed for the ten-day term is not lapsed,right of objection to be exercised, the voting rightrights and theany rights other non-asset linkedthan property rights connected with the shares held byof the shareholders who have subscribedsigning up to the above mentioned agreements can not be exercised.agreement are suspended. If an objection decision is issued with due justification detailing the opposition power is exercised through a duly motivated act in considerationactual prejudicial effect of the prejudice that may be caused by saidaforesaid agreements to the vital interests of the Italian State, the shareholders agreements shallagreement will be null and void. If in the shareholders’ meetingsconduct during the Shareholders’ Meeting of the shareholders who have signed shareholders’ agreements behave as if those agreements disciplinedbound by the agreement reveals that the undertakings given under an agreement pursuant to the aforesaid Article 122 of the TUF were still in effect,Consolidated Law on Finance have been maintained, any resolutions passed with the resolutions approved with theircasting vote if determining for the approval, canof these same shareholders may be sued;challenged;
(c) veto power –vetoing, if duly motivated in connection withjustified by an actual prejudicial effect to the prejudice to thevital interests of the State, – with respect to Shareholders’ Meetingof resolutions to wind-updissolve the Company, transfer the company, tomerge, demerge, transfer the enterprise, to merger or to demerger, to transfer the headquarters of the company abroad, to registered office overseas,

152


change the company objects or topurpose, amend the By-laws cancelingBy-Laws in a way that withdraws or modifying any ofmodifies the special powers describeddetailed in this section (with reference to letters a)(a), b)(b), c)(c) and the followingsubsequent letter d)(d); and
(d) appointment of a Director with no right to vote in Board member without voting right in the Board resolutions.meetings.

The acts whereby these specialDecisions to exercise the powers are exerciseddetailed in letters a), b) and c) may be subject to a lawsuitchallenged within sixty days, by the legitimate subjectsparties entitled to do so, before the Regional Administrative Court of Lazio within 60 days.Lazio.

These powers have been limited after some decisions of the European Court of Justice. The European Court, on March 23,26, 2009, declared that Italian Regulation that defined the criteria for exercising such special powers (DPCM of June 10, 2004) violated the provisions of Articles 43 (former Article 52, right of establishment) and 56 (free movement of capitals) of the European Treaty. To obtain further information about the measures examined to comply with the ruling of the Court, the European Commission has sent the Italian authorities a formal notice under European Community infringements procedures (Article 228). Management can not foresee developments on this matter: only the Government is responsible for the amendment of the above mentioned regulation.

Law No. 266In order to "promote privatization and the spread of December 23, 2005 (Budget Law for 2006)investment in shares" of companies in which the State has a significant shareholding, Article 1, paragraphs 381 to 384 in orderof Law No. 266 of 2005 (2006 Financial Law) introduced the power to promoteadd provisions to the processBy-Laws of privatization and the diffusion among the public of shareholdings inprivatized companies in whichprimarily controlled by the State, holds significant stakes, introduced the option to include in the By-laws of such listed companies, like Eni, provisions for the issuance ofwhich allow shares or securities bearing the same characteristics as shares, which giveparticipating financial instruments to be issued that grant the special meeting of their relevantits holders the right to request the issuance on their behalf ofthat new shares, alsoeven at par value, or securities bearingnew financial instruments be issued to them with the right to vote at bothin ordinary and extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting. The introduction of these normsMeetings. Making this amendment to the By-Laws would lead to the shareholding limit referred to in Eni’s By-laws would entail the cancellation of the 3% threshold to individual shareholdings as contained in the mentioned Article 6.1 of the By-Laws being removed. At the present time, however, Eni’s By-laws. To date, Eni’s By-laws doesn’tBy-Laws do not contain thisany such provision.

Minority protection provisionsShareholder ownership thresholds

In order to allow forThere are no By-Laws provisions governing the presence of representatives elected by minority shareholders, under Italian laws, listed companies such as Eni. must provide for the election of directors and statutory auditors through the "voto di lista" (voting list) system, to ensure that minority shareholders of a company are represented on its Board of Directors and Board of Statutory Auditors. Accordingly, Eni’s By-laws require that the membersdisclosure of the Board of Directors having decisional powers andownership threshold because the Board of Statutory Auditors have to be elected on the basis of candidate lists presented either by one or more shareholders, representing, alone or in aggregate, at least 1% of the Eni’s share capital having the right to vote at ordinary shareholders’ meetings, ormatter is regulated by the Board of Directors.

Each shareholder can present or participate in presenting and voting for only one list. Entities controlling a shareholder and companies controlled by a common entity are forbidden from presenting or otherwise concurring to the presentation of additional lists and from voting them, also through broker or fiduciaries.

Such candidate lists, in which the independent candidates are clearly identified, must be deposited at the Eni’s registered office and published in at least three Italian newspapers having general circulation in Italy (two of which must be business dailies). Publication of the candidate list presented by the Board of Directors shall occur at least 20 days before the first call (as defined below) of the Shareholders’ Meeting. Such term is reduced to 10 days in the case of candidate lists proposed by shareholders. Each shareholder may present or participate in the presentation of only one candidate list and each candidate may appearlaw. Under Consolidated Law on only one list.

Lists must be also be filed with Borsa Italiana and published on Eni’s website.

All candidates must posses the honorability requirements as provided for by the applicable legislation. Filing a list is a pre-requisite for its validity together with filing of a professional curriculum of each candidate and statements in which each candidate accepts his candidature and attests the lack of situations of ineligibility or incompatibility and the possession of the honorability and, in case, the independence requirements.

151


After the votes are cast, appointments take place by extracting seven tenths of directors from the majority list in the order in which they are listed and the remaining directors from the other lists that must not be directly or indirectly connected with the shareholders that filed or voted the list that collected the majority of votes. The list vote is applied only when the whole Board is re-elected. In case of appointment of directors that for whatever reason have not been voted according to the described procedure, the Shareholders’ Meeting decides with the majorities set by the law, so that the composition of the Board complies with the law and Eni’s By-laws.

As per Article 6, paragraph 2, letter d) of Eni’s By-laws, the Minister for Economy and Finance in agreement with the Minister of Economic Development, may appoint one member of the Board without voting rights in addition to those appointed by the Shareholders’ Meeting. The Ministers chose not to appoint such member (see "Special Powers of the Italian State").

According to Article 28.2 of Eni’s By-laws in accordance with the law, the Shareholders’ Meeting shall elect Chairman of the Board of Statutory Auditors a member elected from a list other than the one obtaining the majority of votes.

Several provisions of Italian legislation are intended to increase the protection of minority shareholders. In particular: (i) shareholders’ meetings must be called also upon request of holders of at least 10% of the outstanding shares (Article 2367 Civil Code); (ii) the attendance quorum required for a valid shareholder meeting at an extraordinary meeting is at least 50% of the outstanding shares on first call, while on second call the attendance quorum is more than 1/3 of the shares outstanding and on third and following calls the attendance quorum is at least 1/5 of the shares outstanding. On first, second and third call, resolutions shall be approved by a majority of 2/3 of the shares represented at the Shareholders’ Meeting (Articles 2368-2369 Civil Code); (iii) in addition to the general action against the Board of Directors approved by the Shareholders’ Meeting, shareholders’ actions against the Board of Directors and the Statutory Auditors may be initiated by shareholders holding at least 2.5% of the outstanding shares (Articles 2393, 2393-bis and 2407 Civil Code); (iv) a single shareholder may sue the directors for individual damages (Article 2395 Civil Code) or complain to the Board of Statutory Auditors about directors’ misconduct; if the complaint is filed by shareholders representing at least 2% of the share capital of a listed company, the Statutory Auditors are required to investigate with no delay and report to the Shareholders’ Meeting (Article 2408 Civil Code); and (v) shareholders holding at least 5% of the outstanding share may report to the Court directors’ serious misconduct. The Court may order the inspection of the management, adopt interim measures and replace directors with a judicial Commissioner (Article 2409 Civil Code). The companies’ By-laws may further lower the thresholds in (iii), (iv) and (v) and increase the voting quorums under (ii).

Reporting requirements and restrictions on acquisitions of shares

Holdings in listed companies. Under law15 and Consob Regulation816, as modified following the implementation of Directive 2004/109/EC (the Transparency Directive9) any direct or indirect holding in the voting shares of a listed issuer in excess of 2%17, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 66,6%66.6%, 75%, 90% and 95% must be promptly disclosed to the investee company and to Consob.

The same disclosure requirements refer to holdings which fall below one of the specified threshold.

As specified in new Article 117-bis of Consob Regulation, these obligations apply also to treasury-shares owned directly or through its subsidiary companies by a listed issuer.

Due declarations shall be made within five trading days of the date of the transaction triggering the obligation to notify, regardless of the date on which it is to take effect, using the specific forms attached to the above mentioned Regulation. In the event the same relevant participation is directly or indirectly held by two or more entities, the obligation to notify may be satisfied by one of such person, provided that completeness of information is guaranteed.

The relevant thresholds noted above shall be calculated including: (i) shares owned by the reporting person, even if the voting rights belong or are assigned to third parties, or are suspended, as well as shares of which the voting rights belong or are assigned to him; and (ii) shares held through third parties (and shares whose voting rights are assigned to such third parties) such as nominees, trustees or subsidiary companies.

Article 119 of Consob Decision No. 11971/1999, provide also for specific disclosure requirements (with partially different thresholds), connected to the potential holdings (such as holdings of derivatives or other equity-linked securities), so that, in calculating the defined threshold, potential holdings shall not be aggregated with actual holding.


(8)iArticle 119 of Consob Decision No. 11971/1999 and subsequently amendments.
(9)Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of December 15, 2004 on the harmonisation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market and amending Directive 2001/34/EC.

153


The obligation to notify also applies to any direct or indirect participation owned through ADRs. Specific disclosure requirements (with partially different thresholds), are connected to the so called "potential holdings" (such as holdings of derivatives or other equity-linked securities).

Voting rights attached to listed shares which have not been notified pursuant the above mentioned disclosure requirements may not be exercised. Any resolution or act adopted in violation of such limitation, with the contribution of those undisclosed shares, could be voided if challenged in Court, under the Civil Code, by shareholders or by Consob itself.

Moreover, basedThe Consolidated Law on reasoned investor protection and/or market efficiency aims, Consob is entitled to fix the first relevant threshold to a measure lower than 2%, by its decree (as provided for Law Decree No. 5 of February 2, 2009, converted into Law No. 33 of April 9, 2009). This faculty may be exercised only for definite period of time, with regard to public companies with high capitalization level.

Holdings in unlisted companies. Under law and Consob Regulation (Article 125 of the mentioned decision), listed issuers holding more than 10% of the voting capital of an Italian or foreign unlisted company or a "società a responsabilità limitata" as regulated in Italian Civil Code (Articles 2462-2483), shall inform the investee company, within seven days from reaching such threshold (applying, for calculating this thresholds, the some rules established for holding in listed companies).

In the same way, the non-listed company must be notified about any subsequent reduction of such participation below the 10% threshold.

Listed companies are also required to notify Consob of their participation exceeding 10% of the voting share capital of non-listed companies or "società a responsabilità limitata" owned at the closing date of the financial year, within 30 days from the date of approval of the draft annual report.

Cross-holdings rules

In addition to the rules of Article 2359-bis of the Italian civil code governing the acquisition of shares of the parent company by a controlled subsidiary, Decree No. 58/1998Finance regulates additional cross-ownership matters as follows.

Cross-ownership between listed and non-listed companies may not exceed 2% of the shares of the listed company or 10% of the shares of the non-listed company (applying, for calculating these ownership thresholds, the same rules established for holdings in listed companies).

The company that last exceed the limit of 2% or 10% interest in a listed or unlisted company respectively, may not exercise the voting rights on the shares held in excess of such thresholds and must sell such shares within the following 12 months. In the event of failure to make the disposal within such time limit, the suspension of voting rights shall apply to the entire shareholding, and any resolution or act adopted with the contribution of relevant shares, could be challenged under the Civil Code.

If anyone holds an interest exceeding 2% of the share capital of a listed company, such listed company or any entity controlling such listed company may not acquire an interest exceeding 2% of the share capital of a listed company controlled by said holder. If the foregoing limit is exceeded, the holder who last exceeded the foregoing limit (or


(15)Legislative Decree No. 58 of February 24, 1998, with specific reference to Articles 120-122.
(16)Article 117 of Consob Decision No. 11971/1999 and subsequently amendments.
(17)Moreover, based on reasoned investor protection and/or market efficiency aims, Consob is entitled to fix the first relevant threshold to a measure lower than 2%, by its decree (as provided for Law Decree No. 5 of February 2, 2009, converted into Law No. 33 of April 9, 2009). This faculty may be exercised only for definite period of time, with regard to public companies with high capitalization level.

153


both the holders, if it is not possible to ascertain which holder exceeded such limit last) may not exercise the voting right related to the shares exceeding the foregoing limit. In the event of non-compliance, the voting rights attached to the shares in excess of the limit specified shall be suspended and any resolution or act adopted with the contribution of relevant shares could be challenged under the Italian Civil Code.

Described limitations are not applicable in case of a takeover bid or exchange tender offer for acquiring at least 60% of the ordinary shares of a listed company. For a description of

Under the limitationsame Consolidated Law on cross-ownership between a company and its subsidiaries, see "Purchase by Eni SpA of its Own Shares".

Shareholders’ agreements

Under Decree No. 58/1998,Finance, any agreement, in whatever form, intended to regulateregarding the exercise of voting rights in a listed company or in the companies controlling a listedits parent company, together with anymust be, within five days of its subsequent amendments, renewal or termination, must be:stipulation: (i) notified to Consob, within five days from its execution;Consob; (ii) disclosed to the public through the publication,published in summaryabstract form, in the Italian daily press, within ten days from its execution; andpress; (iii) deposited infiled with the Companies’ Register of Companies in which the place where such listed company has its registered office within 15 days from its conclusion.is registered; and (iv) notified to the company with listed shares. In the event of non-compliance with these requirements, the agreements shall be null and void and the voting rights connected to the relevant shares may not be exercised and any resolution or act adopted with the contribution of such shares could be challenged under the Italian Civil Code.

154


The same requirementsprovisions also apply to agreements, in whatever form, that: (a) impose an obligationcreate obligations of consultation prior to the exercise of voting rights in a listed company and in its controlling companies; (b) set limits on the transfer of the related shares or of other financial instruments that entitle holders to buy or subscribe for them; (c) provide for the purchase of the shares or of above mentioned financial instruments; (d) have as their object or

effect the exercise, jointly or otherwise, of dominant influence on such companies; and d-bis)(d-bis) which aim to encourage or frustrate a takeover bid or equity swap, including commitments relating to non-participation in a takeover bid.

In the event of non-compliance with said requirements, the agreements shall be null and void, the voting rights connected to the relevant shares may not be exercised and any resolution or act adopted with the contribution of such shares could be challenged under the Civil Code.

If the parties have agreed upon the duration of the agreement, such duration cannot exceed three years. In case of agreements concluded for an indeterminate period, each party may withdraw on giving six months’ notice.

Antitrust rules

InFinally, in accordance with Law No. 287 of October 10, 1990, any merger or acquisition of sole or joint control over a company that would create or strengthen a dominant position in the domestic market in a manner that eliminates or significantly reduces competition is prohibited and mergers and acquisition of specified dimension must be subject to preventive authorization of Italian Antitrust Authority1018. However, if the acquiring party and the company to be acquired operate in more than one EU member state and together exceed certain revenue thresholds, the antitrust approval of the acquisition falls within the exclusive jurisdiction of the European Commission.

Shareholders’ meetingsChanges in share capital

The Shareholders’ Meeting could be "ordinary" or "extraordinary". In particular, an ordinary meeting appoints and revokes directors and statutory auditors, approves financial statements within 120 days fromEni’s By-Laws do not provide for more stringent conditions than is required by the end of each fiscal year (December 31) and vote on other issues that can be defined in the By-laws, while an extraordinary meeting approves amendments in By-laws and extraordinary transactions, such aslaw.

Share capital increases and mergers.

The notice of a Shareholders’ Meeting may specify two meeting dates ("calls") for ordinary meetings and three calls, in case of listed companies, for extraordinary shareholders’ meetings. Shareholders’ meetings are usually held at the Company registered office unless otherwise resolved by the Board of Directors, provided however they are held in Italy.

Meetings are called by Eni’s Board of Directors when required or deemed necessary, or on request of shareholders representing at least 10% of outstanding shares, who must provide an agenda of the matters to be discussed to the Chairman of the Board of Directors. Meetings may also be called, by the Board of Statutory Auditors or by two auditors, provided that such call has been notified in advance. Shareholders representing at least one fortieth of Eni’s share capital, both on an individual and a cumulative basis, may ask, within five days as of the date of publication of the Shareholders’ Meeting notice, to add other items in the agenda. The request shall contain the matters to be proposed to the Shareholders’ Meeting. Said faculty may not be exercised on the matters upon which, pursuant to the applicable legislation, the Shareholders’ Meeting resolves on the basis of a proposal of the Board of Directors or on the basis of a project or report of the Board. The integrations accepted by the Board shall be published, through a specific notice, at least ten days before the Shareholders’ Meeting date.

The attendance quorum for an ordinary meeting on first call is at least 50% of the outstanding ordinary shares, while on second call there is no attendance quorum requirement. At a duly called ordinary meeting, in both first and second calls, resolutions may be approved by a simple majority of the shares represented at the meeting.

The attendance quorum required for a valid shareholder meetingshareholders’ resolution at an extraordinary meeting is at least 50% of the company’s share capital on first call, or more than 1/3 or at least 1/5 of the company’s share capital, on second call and third call, respectively. On first, second and third call, resolutions may be approved by a majority of 2/3 of the shares represented at the Shareholders’ Meeting.

With the aim of facilitating the attendance of shareholders, according According to law and Article 13 of the By-laws, calls for meetings are published, at least 30 days before the date fixed for the meeting on first call, in the Official Gazette of the Italian Republic or in the "Il Sole 24 Ore", "Corriere della Sera" and "Financial Times" newspapers. The notice is filed with Borsa Italiana and published on the Company website, also. The reports and proposals of the Board of Directors for any item on the agenda of the meeting together with the financial statements to be submitted to the shareholders’ approval, must be deposited at the shareholders’ disposal at the Company’s registered office and at Borsa Italiana’s, during the 15 days before the Shareholders’ Meeting.


(10)Autorità garante per la concorrenza ed il mercato (AGCM - www.agcm.it).

155


The shareholders are entitled to attend and vote at ordinary and extraordinary shareholders’ meetings. Each holder is entitled to cast one vote for each share held. Votes may be cast personally, by proxy or by mail, in accordance with applicable regulations.

Admission to the Shareholders’ Meeting is granted to shareholders who deliver the notification of attendance issued by financial intermediaries, under applicable laws, at least two business days prior to the date of the meeting on first call. The communication can be withdrawn, through the financial intermediaries, in which case shareholders lose the right to participate. Shareholders may attend the meeting by proxy. Directors, Statutory Auditors, and employees of Eni or of their subsidiary companies, as well as the External Auditors of Eni, and its subsidiary companies, may not be appointed proxies. Any one proxy may not represent more than 200 shareholders. A proxy may be appointed only for a single meeting, including the first, second and third call thereof, unless the proxy is general or given by a company, association, foundation, other entities or institutions to its employees. Rules relating to proxies solicitation are established by Decree No. 58/1998 and the related Consob Decision No. 11971/1999. Accordingly whereby: (i) proxies may be solicited, collected or exercised by banks, investment firms and shareholders’ associations; (ii) proxies may be granted only in respect of shareholders’ meetings that have been called; and (iii) proxies may be limited to voting on particular proposals.

Decree No. 58 provisions also allow companies to implement vote by mail procedures.

Eni’s By-laws allow vote by mail and the collection of proxies in Articles 13 and 14. Vote by mail can be revoked by express communication sent to the Company at least one day before the meeting. Persons that intend to attend the meeting as legal or voluntary representatives of other shareholders must present the documentation confirming their power to the proper office of the Company according to the dates and forms indicated in the call for the meeting. In addition, as provided by Article 14 of Eni’s By-laws, in order to simplify the collection of proxies issued by shareholders that are also employees of Eni and Group companies and members of associations of shareholders that comply with current regulations, Eni provides areas for communicating and collecting proxies to said associations in ways to be agreed from time to time with their legal representatives.

There are no limitations arising under Italian law or the Eni’s By-laws on the right of non-resident or foreign persons to hold or vote the shares other than limitations that apply generally to all shareholders.

Meetings are conducted according to the "Eni’s Shareholders’ Meeting Regulation" as approved by the ordinary Shareholders’ Meeting of Eni on December 4, 1998 and amended by the ordinary Shareholders’ Meeting held on May 28, 2004 in order to adequate its provisions to new rules introduced in the Civil Code on this matter.

During shareholders’ meetings, the Board of Directors provides wide disclosure on items examined and shareholders can request information on issues in the agenda. Information is provided within the limits of confidentiality, taking account of applicable rules regulating price sensitive information.

Subscription rights

New shares may be issued pursuant to a resolution of shareholders at an extraordinary meeting. Under the Italian law, shareholders have a pre-emptive right to subscribe for new issues of shares and corporate bonds convertible into shares in proportion to their respective shareholdings. Subject to certaindefinite conditions, principally designated to prevent dilutionreduction of (actual) shareholders rights, and to preserve the rights of shareholders, thisCompany’s interest, the pre-emptive right may be waived or limited by a shareholders’ resolution taken byat an extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting bywith the affirmative voteconsent of more than 50% of the shares outstanding. Such percentage applies to all calls of the meeting. The preemptiveshareholders’ pre-emptive right is also waived by the law, in specific cases, such as non-cash contributions.

Liquidation rights

Under the Italian law, subject to the satisfactioncase of the claims of all other creditors, shareholders are entitled to the distribution of the remaining liquidated assets of Eni in proportion to the nominal value of their shares. Holders of savings shares and preferred shares, if foreseen by the By-laws, in the event such shares are issued by Eni, would be entitled to a preferred right to distribution from liquidation up to their nominal value. Thereafter, if there are surplus assets, ordinary shareholders rank equally in the distribution of such assets. Shares rank pari passu among ordinary shareholders in a liquidation.contributions in-kind.

 

Material Contracts

None.

156


Documents on Display

It is possible to read and copy documents referred to in this annual report on Form 20-F that have been filed with the SEC at the SEC’s public reference room located at 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580, Washington, DC 20549 and at the SEC’s other public reference rooms in New York City and Chicago. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference rooms and their copy charges. The SEC filings are also available to the public from commercial document retrieval services and in the website maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov. It is also possible to read and copy documents referred to in this annual report on Form 20-F at the New York Stock Exchange, 20 Broad Street, 17th floor, New York.

 

Exchange Controls

There are no exchange controls in Italy. Residents and non-residents of Italy may effect any investments, divestments and other transactions that entail a transfer of assets to or from Italy, subject only to the reporting, record-keeping and disclosure requirements described below. In particular, residents of Italy may hold foreign currency and foreign securities of any kind, within and outside Italy, while non-residents may invest in Italian securities without restriction and may export from Italy cash, instruments of credit or payment and securities, whether in foreign currency or euro, representing interest, dividends, other asset distributions and the proceeds of dispositions.


(18)Autorità garante per la concorrenza ed il mercato (AGCM - www.agcm.it).

154


Updated reporting and record-keeping requirements are contained in the Italian legislation which implements an EU directive regarding the free movement of capital. Such legislation requires that transfers into or out of Italy of cash or securities in excess of euro 12.5 thousand be reported in writing to the Ufficio Italiano Cambi (the Italian Exchange Office) by residents or non-residents that effect such transfers directly, or by banks, securities dealers or Poste Italiane SpA (Italian Mail) that effect such transactions on their behalf. In addition, banks, securities dealers or Poste Italiane SpA effecting such transactions on behalf of residents or non-residents of Italy are required to maintain records of such transactions for five years, which records may be inspected at any time by Italian tax and judicial authorities.

Non-compliance with these reporting and record-keeping requirements may result in administrative fines or, in the case of false reporting and in certain cases of incomplete reporting, criminal penalties. The Ufficio Italiano Cambi will maintain reports for a period of ten years and may use them, directly or through other government offices, to police money laundering, tax evasion and any other crime or violation.

 

Taxation

The information set forth below is a summary only, and Italian, the United States and other tax laws may change from time to time. Holders of shares and ADRs should consult with their professional advisors as to the tax consequences of their ownership and disposition of the shares and ADRs, including, in particular, the effect of tax laws of any other jurisdiction.

 

Italian Taxation

The following is a summary of the material Italian tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of shares or ADRs as at the date hereof and does not purport to be a complete analysis of all potential tax effects relevant to the ownership or disposition of shares or ADRs.

Income tax

Dividends, in respect of 20082009 profits, received by Italian resident individuals in relation to interest exceeding 2% of the voting rights or 5% of the share capital ("substantial interest") are included in the taxable income subject to personal income tax to the extent of 49.72% of their amount. Personal income tax applies at progressive rates ranging from 23% to 43% plus local surtaxes. Dividends received by Italian resident individuals in relation to non-substantial interest not related to the conduct of a business are subject to a substitute tax of 12.5% withheld at the source by the dividend paying agent. This being the case, the dividend is not to be included in the individual’s tax return. If the non-substantial interest is related to the conduct of a business, dividends received in respect of 20082009 profits are included in the taxable business income to the extent of 49.72% of their amount.

Despite the above statement, dividends are included in the taxable income at 40% to the extent they relate to un-distributed profit of 2007 and previous years.

157


Dividends received by Italian pension funds are included in the overall result of the pension funds subject to an 11% substitute tax. Dividends received by Italian collective investment funds are included in the overall result of the collective investment funds subject to a 12.5% substitute tax. Dividends received by Italian real estate investment funds are not subject to tax in the hands of the real estate investment funds (under certain circumstances a 1% tax on net asset value is applied). Entities exempt from IRES (company income tax) are subject to the substitute tax at the rate of 27%.

Dividends paid to non-Italian residents are subject to the same substitute tax levied at source by the dividend paying agent at the rate of 27%, provided that the interest is not connected to an Italian permanent establishment. Up to four-ninths of the substitute tax withheld might be recovered by the non-resident shareholder from the Italian Tax Authorities upon provision of evidence of full payment of income tax on such dividend in his/her country of residence in an amount at least equal to the total refund claimed.

Dividends are subject to the 1.375% substitute tax introduced by Financial Bill for 2008 where the conditions in Article 27, paragraph 3-ter, Presidential Decree No. 600 of 1973 are met, i.e. dividends are paid to companies and entities subject to a corporate income tax in a European Union member state or in Norway.

155


The substitute tax may also be reduced under the tax treaty in force between Italy and the country of residence of the Beneficial Owner of the dividend. Italy has executed income tax treaties with approximately 70 foreign countries, including all EU member states, Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, Switzerland, the United States and some countries in Africa, the Middle East and the Far East. Generally speaking, it should be noted that tax treaties are not applicable where the holder is a tax-exempt entity or, with few exceptions, a partnership or a trust.

In order to obtain the treaty benefit (reduced substitute tax rate) at the same time of payment, the Beneficial Owner must file an application to the dividend paying agent chosen by the Depositary stating the existence of the conditions for the applicability of the treaty benefit, together with a certification issued by the foreign Tax Authorities stating that the shareholder is a resident of that country for treaty purposes.

Under the tax treaty between the United States and Italy, dividends derived and beneficially owned by a U.S. resident who holds less than 10%25% of the Company’s shares are subject to an Italian withholding or substitute tax at a reduced rate of 15%, provided that the interest is not effectively connected with a permanent establishment in Italy through which the U.S. resident carries on a business or a fixed establishment in Italy through which such U.S. resident performs independent personal services (for further details please refer to the relevant provisions set forth in the Italy-U.S. Tax Treaty). In the absence of such conditions, the dividend paying agent will deduct from the gross amount of the dividend the substitute tax at the statutory rate of 27%. The threshold holding will be increased to 25% following a new tax treaty that has been ratified.

Based on the certification procedure required by the Italian Tax Authorities, to benefit from the direct application of the 15% substitute tax the U.S. shareholder must provide the dividend paying agent with a certificate obtained from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") with respect to each dividend payment. The request for that certificate must include a statement, signed under penalties for perjury, to the effect that the shareholder is a U.S. resident individual or corporation, and does not maintain a permanent establishment in Italy, and must set forth other required information. The normal time for processing requests for certification by the IRS is normally about six to eight weeks.

Where the Beneficial Owner has not provided the above mentioned documentation, the dividend paying agent will deduct from the gross amount of the dividend the substitute tax at the statutory rate of 27%. The U.S. recipient will then be entitled to claim from the Italian Tax Authorities the difference ("treaty refund") between the domestic rate and the treaty one by filing specific forms (certificate) with the Italian Tax Authorities.

According to the Italian tax law as reflected in the Deposit Agreement, the Company is not involved: (i) in withholding amounts due by holders of ADRs to relevant taxing authorities in connection with any distributions relating to ADRs; or (ii) in the procedures through which certain holders of ADRs may obtain tax rebates, credits, refunds or other similar benefits. Pursuant to the Deposit Agreement, the custodian and the Depositary have undertaken to use reasonable efforts to make and maintain arrangements to enable persons that are considered to be resident in United States for purposes of applicable law to receive any rebates or tax credits (pursuant to treaty or otherwise) relating to distributions on the ADRs to which such persons are entitled. In addition, the Depositary has agreed to establish procedures to enable all holders to take advantage of any rebates or tax credits (pursuant to treaty or otherwise) relating to distributions on the ADRs to which such holders are entitled and to provide, at least annually, a written notice, in a form previously agreed to by the Company, to the holders of ADRs of any necessary actions to be undertaken by such Holders.

158


Capital gains tax

This paragraph applies with respect to capital gains out of the scope of a business activity carried out in Italy.

Gains realized by Italian resident individuals upon the sale of substantial interest is included in the taxable base subject to personal income tax to the extent of 49.72% of their amount, while gains realized upon the sale of non substantial interest is subject to a substitute tax at a 12.5% rate.

For gains deriving from the sale of non substantial interest, two different systems may be applied at the option of the shareholder as an alternative to the filing of the tax return:

 the so-called "administered savings" tax regime (risparmio amministrato), based on which intermediaries acting as shares depositaries shall apply a substitute tax (12.5%) on each gain, on a cash basis. If the sale of shares generated a loss, said loss may be carried forward up to the fourth following year; and
 the so-called "portfolio management" tax regime (risparmio gestito) which is applicable when the shares form part of a portfolio managed by an Italian asset management company. The accrued net profit of the portfolio is subject to a 12.5% substitute tax to be applied by the portfolio.

Gains realized by non-residents from non substantial interest in listed companies are deemed not to be realized in Italy and consequently are not subject to the capital gains tax.

156


On the contrary, gains realized by non-residents from substantial interest even in listed companies are deemed to be realized in Italy and consequently they are subject to the capital gains tax.

However double taxation treaties may eliminate the capital gains tax. Under the income tax convention between the United States and Italy, a U.S. resident will not be subject to the capital gains tax unless the shares or ADRs form part of the business property of a permanent establishment of the holder in Italy or pertain to a fixed establishment available to a shareholder in Italy for the purposes of performing independent personal services. U.S. residents who sell shares may be required to produce appropriate documentation establishing that the above-mentioned conditions of non-taxability pursuant to the convention have been satisfied.

Inheritance and gift tax

Pursuant to Law Decree No. 262 of October 3, 2006, converted with amendments by Law No. 286 of November 24, 2006 effective from November 29, 2006, and Law No. 296 of December 27, 2006, the transfers of any valuable assets (including shares) as a result of death or donation (or other transfers for no consideration) and the creation of liens on such assets for a specific purpose are taxed as follows:

(a) 4 per cent: if the transfer is made to spouses and direct descendants or ancestors; in this case, the transfer is subject to tax on the value exceeding euro 1,000,000 (per beneficiary);
(b) 6 per cent: if the transfer if made to brothers and sisters; in this case, the transfer is subject to the tax on the value exceeding euro 100,000 (per beneficiary);
(c) 6 per cent: if the transfer is made to relatives up to the fourth degree, to persons related by direct affinity as well as to persons related by collateral affinity up to the third degree; and
(d) 8 per cent: in all other cases.

If the transfer is made in favor of persons with severe disabilities, the tax applies on the value exceeding euro 1,500,000. Moreover, an anti-avoidance rule is provided for by Law No. 383 of October 18, 2001 for any gift of assets (including shares) which, if sold for consideration, would give rise to capital gains subject to a substitute tax (imposta sostitutiva) provided for by Decree No. 461 of November 21, 1997. In particular, if the donee sells the shares for consideration within five years from the receipt thereof as a gift, the donee is required to pay a relevant substitute tax on capital gains as if the gift had never taken place.

 

United States Taxation

The following is a summary of certain U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. Holders (as defined below) of the ownership and disposition of Shares or ADRs. This summary is addressed to U.S. Holders that hold Shares or ADRs as capital assets, and does not purport to address all material tax consequences of the ownership of Shares or ADRs. The summary does not address special classes of investors, such as tax-exempt entities, dealers in securities, traders in securities that elect to mark to market, certain insurance companies, broker-dealers, investors liable for alternative minimum tax, investors that actually or constructively own 10% or more of Eni SpA’s Shares, investors that hold Shares or ADRs as part of a straddle or a hedging or conversion transaction and investors whose "functional currency" is not the U.S. dollar.

This summary is based on the tax laws of the United States (including the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the "Code") its legislative history, existing and proposed regulations thereunder, published rulings and court decisions) as in effect on the date hereof, and which are subject to change (or changes in interpretation),

159


possibly with retroactive effect. The summary is based in part on representations of the Depositary and assumes that each obligation in the Deposit Agreement and any related agreement will be performed in accordance with its terms. U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors to determine the U.S. federal, state and local and foreign tax consequences to them of the ownership and disposition of Shares or ADRs.

As used in this section, the term "U.S. Holder" means a beneficial owner of Shares or ADRs who or that is: (i) a citizen or resident of the United States; (ii) a domestic corporation; (iii) an estate the income of which is subject to the United States federal income tax without regard to its source; or (iv) a trust if a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust and one or more United States persons have the authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust.

The discussion does not address any aspects of the United States taxation other than federal income taxation. In particular, U.S. Holders are urged to confirm their eligibility for benefits under the income tax convention between the United States and Italy with their advisors and to discuss with their advisors any possible consequences of their failure to qualify for such benefits.

157


In general, and taking into account the earlier assumptions, for the United States federal income tax purposes, U.S. Holders who own ADRs evidencing ADRs will be treated as owners of the underlying Shares. Exchanges of Shares for ADRs and ADRs for shares generally will not be subject to the United States federal income tax.

Dividends

Subject to the passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, rules discussed below, distributions paid on the shares generally will be treated as dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent paid out of Eni SpA’s current or accumulated earnings and profits as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes, but will not be eligible for the dividends received-deduction generally allowed to corporations. To the extent that a distribution exceeds Eni SpA’s earnings and profits, it will be treated, first, as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the shares or ADRs, and thereafter as capital gain. A U.S. Holder will be subject to U.S. federal taxation, on the date of actual or constructive receipt by the U.S. Holder (in the case of Shares) or by the Depositary (in the case of ADRs) with respect to the gross amount of any dividends, including any Italian tax withheld therefrom, without regard to whether any portion of such tax may be refunded to the U.S. Holder by the Italian tax authorities. If you are a non-corporate U.S. Holder, dividends paid to you in taxable years beginning before January 1, 2011 that constitute qualified dividend income will be taxable to you at a maximum tax rate of 15% provided that you hold the Shares or ADRs for more than 60 days during the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the ex-dividend date and meet other holding period requirements. Dividends we pay with respect to the shares or ADRs generally will be qualified dividend income. The amount of the dividend distribution that you must include in your income as a U.S. Holder will be the U.S. dollar value of the euro payments made, determined at the spot euro/U.S. dollar rate on the date the dividend distribution is includible in your income, regardless of whether the payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars. Generally, any gain or loss resulting from currency exchange fluctuations during the period from the date you include the dividend payment in income to the date you convert the payment into U.S. dollars will be treated as ordinary income or loss and will not be eligible for the special tax rate applicable to qualified dividend income. The gain or loss generally will be income or loss from sources within the United States for foreign tax credit limitation purposes.

Subject to certain conditions and limitations, Italian tax withheld from dividends will be treated as a foreign income tax eligible for credit against the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability. Special rules apply in determining the foreign tax credit limitation with respect to dividends that are subject to the maximum 15% tax rate. To the extent a refund of the tax withheld is available to a U.S. Holder under Italian law or under the income tax convention, the amount of tax withheld that is refundable will not be eligible for credit against your United States federal income tax liability. See "Italian Taxation – Income Tax" above, for the procedures for obtaining a tax refund. Dividends paid on the Shares will be treated as income from sources outside the United States. For foreign tax credit purposes, dividends will be income from sources outside the United States and will, depending on your circumstances, generally be either "passive" or "general" income for purposes of computing the foreign tax credit allowable to you.

Sale or exchange of shares

Subject to the PFIC rules discussed below, a U.S. Holder generally will recognize gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes on the sale or exchange of Shares or ADRs equal to the difference between the U.S. Holder’s adjusted basis in the shares or ADRs (determined in U.S. dollars), as the case may be, and the amount realized on the sale or exchange (or if the amount realized is denominated in a foreign currency its U.S. dollar equivalent, determined at the spot rate on the date of disposition). Generally, such gain or loss will be treated as capital gain or loss if the Shares or ADRs are held as capital assets and will be a long-term capital gain or loss if the shares or ADRs have been held for more than one year on the date of such sale or exchange. Long-term capital gain of a non-corporate U.S. Holder that is recognized in taxable years beginning before January 1, 2011 is generally subject to a

160


maximum tax rate of 15%. In addition, any such gain or loss realized by a U.S. Holder generally will be treated as U.S. source income or loss for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes.

PFIC rules

Eni SpA believes that shares and ADRs should not be treated as stock of a PFIC for United States federal income tax purposes, but this conclusion is a factual determination that is made annually and thus may be subject to change. If Eni SpA were to be treated as a PFIC, unless a U.S. holder elects to be taxed annually on a mark-to-market basis with respect to the shares or ADRs, gain realized on the sale or other disposition of your shares or ADRs would in general not be treated as capital gain. Instead, if you are a U.S. holder, you would be treated as if you had realized such gain and certain "excess distributions" ratably over your holding period for the shares or

158


ADRs and would be taxed at the highest tax rate in effect for each such year to which the gain was allocated, together with an interest charge in respect of the tax attributable to each such year. With certain exceptions, your shares or ADRs will be treated as stock in a PFIC if Eni SpA were a PFIC at any time during your holding period in your shares or ADRs. Dividends that you receive from Eni SpA will not be eligible for the special tax rates applicable to qualified dividend income if Eni SpA is treated as a PFIC with respect to you either in the taxable year of the distribution or the preceding taxable year, but instead will be taxable at rates applicable to ordinary income.

 

Documents on Display

Eni’s Annual Report and Accounts and any other document concerning the Company are also available online on the Company website at:
http://www.eni.com/en_IT/documentation/documentation.page?type=bilrap&header=documentazione&doc_from=hpeni_header.

The Company is subject to the information requirements of the U.S. Security Exchange Act of 1934 applicable to foreign private issuers.

In accordance with these requirements, Eni files its annual report on Form 20-F and other related documents with the SEC. It’s possible to read and copy documents that have been filed with the SEC at the SEC’s public reference room located at 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, U.S.

You may also call the SEC at +1 800-SEC-0330 or log on to www.sec.gov.

It is also possible to read and copy documents referred to in this annual report on Form 20-F at the New York Stock Exchange, 20 Broad Street, 17th floor, New York, USA.

Item 11. QUALITATIVEQUANTITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVEQUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market risk is the possibility that the exposure to fluctuations in currency exchange rates, interest rates or commodity prices will adversely affect the value of the Group’s financial assets, liabilities or expected future cash flows. Eni’s financial performance is particularly sensitive to changes in the price of crude oil and movements in the euro/U.S. $ exchange rate. Overall, a rise in the price of crude oil has a positive effect on Eni’s results from operations and liquidity due to increased revenues from oil and gas production. Conversely, a decline in crude oil prices reduces Eni’s results from operations and liquidity.

The impact of changes in crude oil prices on the Company’s downstream gas and refining and marketing businesses and petrochemical operations depends upon the speed at which the prices of finished products adjust to reflect changes in crude oil prices. In addition, the Group’s activities are, to various degrees, sensitive to fluctuations in the euro/U.S. $ exchange rate as commodities are generally priced internationally in U.S. dollars or linked to dollar denominated products as in the case of gas prices. Overall, an appreciation of the euro against the dollar reduces the Group’s results from operations and liquidity, and vice versa.

Please refer to Note 29 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a qualitative and quantitative discussion of the Company’s exposure to market risks. Please also refer to Notes 7 and 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for details of the different derivatives owned by the Company in these markets.

As part of its financing and cash management activities, the Company uses derivative instruments to manage its exposure to changes in interest rates and foreign exchange rates. These instruments are principally interest rate and currency swaps. The Company also enters into commodity derivatives as part of its ordinary commercial and trading activities and, from time to time, to hedge the exposure to variability in future cash flows due to movements in commodity prices, in view of pursuing acquisitions of oil and gas reserves as part of the Company’s ordinary asset portfolio management or other strategic initiatives.

These instrumentsPlease refer to Note 28 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a qualitative and their accounting treatment are detailed inquantitative discussion of the Company’s exposure to market risks. Please also refer to Notes 7, 14, 19 and 2524 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements for details of the different derivatives owned by the Company in these markets.

159


Item 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

Item 12A. Debt Securities

Not applicable.

Item 12B. Warrants and Rights

Not applicable.

Item 12C. Other Securities

Not applicable.

Item 12D. American Depositary Shares

In the USA, the Company’s securities are traded in the form of ADSs (American Depositary Shares) which are listed on the New York Stock Exchange. ADSs are evidenced by American Depositary Receipts (ADRs), and each ADR represents two Eni ordinary shares. The depositary receipts are issued, cancelled and exchanged at the office of JP Morgan Chase Bank of New York, 60 Wall Street, 36th Floor, NY 10260, as depositary (the "Depositary") under a deposit agreement between Eni, the Depositary and the holders of ADRs.

JP Morgan Chase Bank is also the transfer agent for Eni ADRs, and its principal office is 2 Heritage Drive, North Quincy, MA 02171.

BNP Paribas is the custodian (the "Custodian") on behalf of the holders of Eni ADRs, and its principal office is located in Milan, Italy.

Fees and charges paid by ADR holders

The depositary collects fees for delivery and surrender of ADSs directly from investors depositing shares or surrendering ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal or from intermediaries acting on their behalf. The Depositary collects fees for making distributions to investors by deducting those fees from the amounts distributed or by selling a portion of distributable property to pay the fees.

160


The table below sets forth all fees and charges that a holder of Eni’s ADRs may have to pay, either directly or indirectly, to JP Morgan, as Depositary.

Type of serviceAmount of fees or charges (1)Depositary Actions



(a) Depositing or substituting the underlying shares.U.S. $ 5.00 for each 100 ADSs
(or portion thereof)
Each person to whom ADRs are issued against deposits of shares, including deposits and issuances in respect of:
• Share distributions, stock split, rights, merger.
• Exchange of securities or any other transaction or event or other distribution affecting the ADSs or the Deposited Securities.



(b) Selling or exercising rights.U.S. $5.00 for each 100 ADSs
(or portion thereof)
Distribution or sale of securities, the fee being in an amount equal to the fee for the execution and delivery of ADSs which would have been charged as a result of the deposit of such securities.



(c) Withdrawing an underlying security.U.S. $5.00 for each 100 ADSs
(or portion thereof)
Acceptance of ADRs surrendered for withdrawal of deposited securities.



(d) Transferring, splitting or grouping receipts.U.S. $1.50 per ADSTransfers, combining or grouping of depositary receipts.



(e) Expenses of the depositary.Expenses payable at the sole discretion of the Depositary by billing holders or by deducting charges from one or more cash dividends or other cash distributions.Expenses incurred on behalf of holders in connection with:
• Compliance with foreign exchange control regulations or any law or regulation relating to foreign investment.
• The depositary’s or its custodian’s compliance with applicable law, rule or regulation.
• Stock transfer or other taxes and other governmental charges.
• Cable, telex, facsimile transmission/delivery.
• Expenses of the depositary in connection with the conversion of foreign currency into U.S. dollars (which are paid out of such foreign currency).
• Any other charge payable by Depositary or its agents.




(1)All fees and charges are paid by ADR holders to JP Morgan as Depositary and Transfer agent.

Fees and payments made by the Depositary to the issuer

The Depositary has agreed to reimburse certain company expenses related to the ADR Program and incurred in connection with the program and the listing of Eni’s ADSs on the New York Stock Exchange. These expenses mainly related to legal and accounting fees incurred in connection with the preparation of regulatory filings and other documentation related to ongoing SEC compliance, NYSE listing fees, listing and custodian bank fees, advertising, certain investor relationship programs or special investor relations activities.

For the year 2009, as agreed in the Deposit Agreement and subsequent amendments, the Depositary reimbursed to Eni a total amount of U.S. $900,000 in connection with above mentioned expenditures.

Expenses waived or paid directly to third parties by the Depositary

There are no agreements whereby the Depositary has agreed to waive the Company for any fees associated with the administration of the ADRs Program or other services thereof, nor to directly pay fees to third-parties.

161


PART II

Item 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES

None.

 

 

Item 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

 

 

Item 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure controls and procedures

In designing and evaluating the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act")), the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and the Company’s management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.

It should be noted that the Company has investments in certain non-consolidated entities. As the Company does not control or manage these entities, its disclosure controls and procedures with respect to such entities are necessarily more limited than those it maintains with respect to its consolidated subsidiaries.

The Company’s management, with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-14(c) under the Exchange Act as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 20-F. Based on that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f). Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements and even when determined to be effective can only provide reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, the effectiveness of an internal control system may change over time.

The Internal Control Committee assists the Board of Directors in setting out the main principles for the internal control system so as to appropriately identify and adequately evaluate, manage, and monitor the main risks related to the Company and its subsidiaries, by laying down the compatibility criteria between said risks and sound corporate management. In addition this Committee assesses, at least annually, the adequacy, effectiveness, and actual operations of the internal control system.

The Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting based on the Internal Control - Integrated-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO"). Based on the results of this evaluation, the Group’s management concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2008.2009.

The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008,2009, has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers SpA, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its report that is included on pages F-1 and F-2 of this Annual Report on Form 20-F.

162


Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have not been changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Form 20-F that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

162


Item 16A. Board of Statutory Auditors Financial Expert

Eni’s Board of Statutory Auditors has determined that five members of Eni’s Board of Statutory Auditors, qualify as "audit committee financial expert", as defined in Item 16A of Form 20-F. These five members are: Ugo Marinelli, who is the Chairman of the Board, and Roberto Ferranti, Luigi Mandolesi, Tiziano Onesti and Giorgio Silva. All members are independent.

 

 

Item 16B. Code of Ethics

Eni adopted a code of ethics that applies to all Eni’s employees including Eni’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer. Eni published its code of ethics on Eni’s website. It is accessible at www.eni.it, under the section Sustainability – Corporate Governance and Corporate Ethics – Code of Ethics. A copy of this code of ethics is included as an exhibit to this Annual Report on Form 20-F.

Eni’s code of ethics contains ethical guidelines, describes corporate values and requires standards of business conduct and moral integrity. The ethical guidelines are designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote honest and ethical conduct, compliance with applicable laws and regulations and internal reporting of violations of the guidelines. The code affirms the principles of accounting transparency and internal control and endorses human rights and the issue of the sustainability of the business model.

 

 

Item 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

PricewaterhouseCoopers SpA has served as EniEni's principal independent public auditor for fiscal years 2006, 2007, 2008 and 20082009 for which audited Consolidated Financial Statements appear in this Annual Report on Form 20-F.

The following table shows total fees paid by Eni, its consolidated and non-consolidated subsidiaries and Eni’s share of fees incurred by joint ventures for services provided by Eni public auditor PricewaterhouseCoopers and its member firms, with respect to the years indicated:

 

Year ended December 31,

  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
 

(thousand euro)


Audit fees 

22,240

 

26,383

 

27,962

Audit-related fees 

166

 

169

 

152

Tax fees 

303

 

81

 

46

All other fees 

6

 

120

 

1

Total 

22,715

 

26,753

 

28,161

  

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
  


(euro thousand)

Audit fees 26,383 27,962 30,748
Audit-related fees 169 152 276
Tax fees 81 46 51
All other fees 120 1 -
Total 26,753 28,161 31,075
  
 
 

Audit Fees include professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements, including the audit on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Audit Related Fees include assurance and related services by the principal accountant that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the registrant’s financial statements and are not reported as

163


Audit Fees in this Item. The fees disclosed in this category mainly include audits of pension and benefit plans, merger and acquisition due diligence, audit and consultancy services rendered in connection with acquisition deals, certification services not provided for by law and regulations and consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.

Tax Fees include professional services rendered by the principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning. The fees disclosed in this category mainly include fees billed for the assistance with compliance and reporting of income and value added taxes, assistance with assessment of new or changing tax regimes, tax consultancy in connection with merger and acquisition deals, services rendered in connection with tax refunds, assistance rendered on occasion of tax inspections and in connection with tax claims and recourses and assistance with assessing relevant rules, regulations and facts going into Eni correspondence with tax authorities.

All Other Fees include products and services provided by the principal accountant, other than the services reported in Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees and Tax Fees of this Item and consists primarily of fees billed for consultancy services related to IT and secretarial services that are permissible under applicable rules and regulations.

163


Pre-approval policies and procedures of the Internal Control Committee

The Board of Statutory Auditors has adopted a pre-approval policy for audit and non-audit services that set forth the procedures and the conditions pursuant to which services proposed to be performed by the principal auditors may be pre-approved. Such policy is applied to entities within the Eni Group which are either controlled or jointly-controlled (directly or indirectly) by Eni SpA. According to this policy, permissible services within the other audit services category are pre-approved by the Board of Statutory Auditors. The Board of Statutory Auditors approval is required on a case by case basis for those requests regarding: (i) audit-related services; and (ii) non-audit services to be performed by the external auditors which are permissible under applicable rules and regulations. In such cases, the Company’s internal audit department is charged with performing an initial assessment of each request to be submitted to the Board of Statutory Auditors for approval. The internal audit department periodically reports to Eni’s Board of Statutory Auditors on the status of both pre-approved services and services approved on a case-by-case basis rendered by the external auditors.

During 2008,2009, no audit-related fees, tax fees or other non-audit fees were approved by the Board of Statutory Auditors pursuant to the de minimis exception to the pre-approval requirement provided by paragraph (c)(7)(i) (c) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.

 

 

Item 16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees

Making use of the exemption provided by Rule 10A-3(c)(3) for non-U.S. private issuers, Eni has identified the Board of Statutory Auditors as the body that, starting from June 1, 2005, is performing the functions required by the SEC rules and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to be performed by the audit committees of non-U.S. companies listed on the NYSE (see "Item 6 – Board of Statutory Auditors" above).

 

 

164


Item 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

The following tables present purchasesIn May 2000, Eni’s Ordinary Shareholders’ Meeting authorized Eni’s Board of Directors to carry out a program for the repurchase of own shares within such limits as established by Enithe Shareholders’ Meeting itself. The authorization was renewed from time to time. The latest authorization for share repurchases granted by the beginningOrdinary Shareholders’ Meeting expired on October 18, 2009. Management does not plan to request authorization for share repurchases in the foreseeable future. In the period from January 1, 2009 up to expiration of the program through May 4, 2009:ongoing authorization on October 18, 2009 the Company did not make any share repurchases.

Period 

Number of shares (million)

 

Average price
(euro per share)

 

Total cost
(euro million)

 

Share
capital %(%)

  
 
 
 
2000 (since September 1) 44.38  12.92 574 1.11
2001 110.00  13.58 1,494 2.75
2002 52.26  14.74 771 1.30
2003 23.94  13.76 329 0.60
2004 4.23  16.60 70 0.10
2005 47.06  21.97 1,034 1.18
2006 53.13  23.35 1,241 1.33
2007 27.56  24.69 680 0.68
2008 35.90  21.67 778 0.90
2009, through May 4, 2009 -  - - -
Total purchased as of May 4, 2009 398.47  17.49 6,971 9.95
minus:         
- stock options exercised and shares granted pursuant to stock option and stock grant plans (15.51)      
Total shares held in treasury 382.95      9.56




164


Total number of shares purchased

Average price paid per share (euro)

Total number of shares purchased, as part of publicly announced plans or programs

Maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs.(2)





At December 31, 2007 (1) 362,562,118 17.08 362,562,118 51,474,995
January 2008 2,709,130 22.13 365,271,248 48,873,565
February 2008 3,380,161 22.25 368,651,409 45,504,204
March 2008 2,606,938 22.01 371,258,347 42,908,766
April 2008 (3) 2,242,200 23.41 373,500,547 40,678,566
May 2008 2,728,900 25.74 376,229,447 37,949,666
June 2008 2,982,450 24.50 379,211,897 34,967,216
July 2008 2,823,050 22.37 382,034,947 32,144,166
August 2008 1,839,400 21.48 383,874,347 30,304,766
September 2008 13,426,200 19.79 397,300,547 16,878,566
October 2008 1,166,306 18.38 398,466,853 15,712,260
November 2008 - - 398,466,853 15,712,260
December 2008 - - 398,466,853 15,712,260
January 2009 - - 398,466,853 15,712,260
February 2009 - - 398,466,853 15,712,260
March 2009 - - 398,466,853 15,712,260
April 2009 - - 398,466,853 15,712,260
May 2009 (through May 4, 2009) - - 398,466,853 15,712,260





(1)From May 2000, Eni’s Ordinary Shareholders’ Meeting has authorized Eni’s Board of Directors to carry out a program for the repurchase of own shares within such limits as established by the Shareholders’ Meeting itself. The shares are to be purchased on the Telematico at a price no lower than their nominal value and no higher than 5% over the reference price recorded on the business day preceding each purchase.
(2)Based on the authorized purchase ceiling, deducting the total number of shares purchased and adding back the number of stock options exercised by and shares granted to Eni’s managers pursuant to stock option and stock grant plans as of Annual Shareholders’ Meeting date.
(3)On April 29, 2008 Eni’s Ordinary Shareholders’ Meeting authorized the continuation of the program for the repurchase of own shares for a further 18-month period and up to 400 million ordinary shares, nominal value euro 1 each, corresponding approximately to 10% of Eni’s share capital, for an aggregate amount not exceeding euro 7.4 billion: The 400 million shares and the euro 7.4 billion thresholds take into account the number and amount of Eni shares held in treasury as of April 29, 2008. As of April 29, 2008, Eni held in treasury 359.08 million own shares at a cost of euro 6,236 million. The 18-month period will expire in October 2009. According to applicable regulations, the nominal value of shares so purchased, including shares held by subsidiaries cannot exceed 20% of a company’s share capital. Shares purchased in excess of such 20% limit must be resold within one year from the date of their purchase.
2000 (since September 1) 44.38  12.92 574 1.11
2001 110.00  13.58 1,494 2.75
2002 52.26  14.74 771 1.30
2003 23.94  13.76 329 0.60
2004 4.23  16.60 70 0.10
2005 47.06  21.97 1,034 1.18
2006 53.13  23.35 1,241 1.33
2007 27.56  24.69 680 0.68
2008 35.90  21.67 778 0.90
2009 -  - - -
Total purchased as of December 31, 2009 398.47  17.49 6,971 9.95
minus:         
- stock options exercised and shares granted pursuant to stock option and stock grant plans (15.53)      
Total shares held in treasury 382.93      9.56
  

 
 
 

 

Item 16F. Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant

Due to the audit firm rotation rules in Italy, PwC, as the Company’s independent public accounting firm, must step-down at the next meeting of the Company’s shareholders (set for April 29, 2010). PwC was hired for a period of three years and served as our independent auditor for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.
PwC’s report on the Company’s financial statements for each of the past three years did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor was it qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principle.
In connection with the audit of the Company’s financial statements in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, there were no disagreements with PwC on any matters of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope and procedures which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of PwC, would have caused PwC to make reference to the matter of such disagreements in their reports.
Eni has provided a copy of this disclosure to PwC and requested that PwC furnish us with a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether or not it agrees with the above statements. A copy of PwC’s letter is filed as an exhibit to this Form 20-F.
The Statutory Board of Auditors has selected Ernst & Young to be appointed as the Company’s new independent auditor, subject to the approval of Eni’s shareholders. If approved, Ernst & Young will become the Company's independent registered public accounting firm effective from April 30, 2010.

 

Item 16G. Significant Differences in Corporate Governance Practices as per Section 303A.11 of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual

Corporate governance.Eni’s governance structure follows the traditional model as defined by the Italian Civil Code which provides for two main separate corporate bodies, the Board of Directors and the Board of Statutory Auditors to whom management and monitoring duties are respectively entrusted.


This model differs from the U.S. one-tier model which provides for the Board of Directors as the sole corporate body responsible for management and for the establishment of an Audit Committee within the same Board, for monitoring activities.


Below is a description of the most significant differences between corporate governance practices followed by U.S. domestic companies under the NYSE standards and those followed by Eni, also with reference to Borsa Italiana Corporate Governance Code that Eni adopted.

165


Independent Directors

NYSE standards. Under NYSE standards listed U.S. companies’ Boards must have a majority of independent directors. A director qualifies as independent when the Board affirmatively determines that such director does not have a material relationship with the listed company (and its subsidiaries), either directly, or indirectly. In particular, a director may not be deemed independent if he/she or an immediate family member has a certain specific relationship with the issuer, its auditors or companies that have material business relationships with the issuer (e.g. he/she is an employee of the issuer or a partner of the auditor).
In addition, a director cannot be considered independent in the three-year "cooling-off" period following the termination of any relationship that compromised a director’s independence.

Eni standards.In Italy, the TUF states that at least one member, or two members if the Board is composed by more than seven members, must possess the independence requirements provided for Statutory Auditors of listed companies.

165



In particular, a director may not be deemed independent if he/she or an immediate family member has relationships with the issuer that could influence their autonomous judgment, with its directors or with the companies in the same group of the issuer.
Eni’s By-laws increases the number and states that at least one member, if the Board is made up by up to five members, or three Board members, in case the Board is made up by more than five members, shall have the independence requirement.
Eni’s Code foresees further independence requirements, in line with the ones provided by the Borsa Italiana Code, that recommends that the Board of Directors includes an adequate number of independent non-executive directors in the sense that they do not maintain, nor have recently maintained, directly or indirectly, any business relationships with the issuer or persons linked to the issuer, of such a significance as to influence their autonomous judgment.
In accordance with Eni’s By-laws, the Board of Directors, after appointment of its member and periodically, evaluates independence of Directors. Eni’s Code also provides for the Board of Statutory Auditors to verify the proper application of criteria and procedures adopted by the Board of Directors to evaluate the independence of its members.
The results of the assessments of the Board shall be communicated to the market.
In accordance with Eni’s By-laws, should the independence requirements be impaired or cease or the minimum number of independent directors diminish below the threshold set by Eni’s By-laws, the Board declares the termination of office of the member lacking said requirements and provides for his substitution. Board members are expected to inform the Company in case they lose their independence requirements or of any reasons for ineligibility or incompatibility that might arise.

 

Meetings of non Executive Directors

NYSE standards.Non-executive directors, including those who are not independent, must meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management.
In addition, if the group of non-executive directors includes directors who are not independent, independent directors should meet separately at least once a year.

Eni standards.As provided The Eni Code allows independent Directors to decide whether to meet in the absence of the other Directors for discussion of topics deemed relevant to the functioning of the Board. This express provision allowing such meetings to take place was requested by Eni’s Code the independent Directors maythemselves in order to have greater flexibility to deal with actual requirements. In 2009, the independent Directors, in consideration of the frequency of the Board meetings, had numerous opportunities to meet, holding formal and informal meetings to hold meetings without the other Directors: this faculty was exercised on January 22, 2009.discussions and exchange opinions.

 

Audit Committee

NYSE standards. Listed U.S. companies must have an audit committee that satisfies the requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that complies with the further provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and of Section 303A.07 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual.

Eni standards. In its meeting of March 22, 2005, Eni’sthe Board of Directors, making useas permitted by the rules of the exemption provided by Rule 10A-3 for non-U.S. privateU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission applicable to foreign issuers haslisted on the regulated U.S. markets, identified the Board of Statutory Auditors as the body that, starting fromsince June 1, 2005, is performinghas been fulfilling, within the functions requiredlimits set forth by Italian laws, the SEC rules andresponsibilities assigned to the Audit Committee of such foreign issuers by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act to be performed byand the audit committees of non-U.S. companies listed on the NYSESEC regulations (see paragraph "Board“Item 6 – Board of Statutory Auditors"Auditors” earlier).

166


Under Section 303A.07 of the NYSE listed Company Manual audit committees of U.S. companies have further functions and responsibilities which are not mandatory for non-U.S. private issuers and which therefore are not included in the list of functions shown in the paragraph referenced above.“Item 6 – Board of Statutory Auditors”.

 

Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee

NYSE standards. U.S. listed companies must have a nominating/corporate governance committee (or equivalent body) composed entirely of independent directors that are entrusted, among others, with the responsibility to identify individuals qualified to become board members and to select or recommend director nominees for submission to the Shareholders’ Meeting, as well as to develop and recommend to the Board of Directors a set of corporate governance guidelines.

Eni standards.This provision is not applicable to non-U.S. private issuers. The Borsa Italiana Code allows listed companies to have within the Board of Directors a committee for directors’ nominees proposals, above all when the Board of Directors detects difficulties in the shareholders’ submission of nominees proposals, as could happen in publicly owned companies.
Eni has not set up a nominating committee, considering the nature of its shareholding as well as the circumstance that, under Eni’s By-laws, directors are appointed by the Shareholders’ Meeting based on lists presented by shareholders.

166


Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

NYSE standards.The NYSE listing standards require each U.S. listed company to adopt a code of business conduct and ethics for its directors, officers and employees, and promptly disclose any waivers of the code for directors or executive officers.

Eni standards.Eni’s Code of Ethic – adopted on March 14, 2008, replacing the previous version of 1998 – represents a clear definition of the value system that Eni recognizes, accepts and upholds and the responsibilities that Eni assumes internally and externally in order to ensure that all business activities are conducted in compliance with laws, in a context of fair competition, with honesty, integrity, correctness and in good faith, respecting the legitimate interests of all stakeholders with which Eni relates on ongoing basis: shareholders, employees, suppliers, customers, commercial and financial partners, and the local communities and institutions of the Countries where Eni operates. These values are stated in the Code of Ethics and all the people working for Eni, without exception or distinction, starting from Directors, senior management and members of Company’s bodies, as also requested by the SEC rules and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, are committed to observing and enforcing these principles within their function and responsibility. The Guarantor for the Code of Ethics – that is the Watch Structure of the "Model 231" for the organizational, management and control according to Legislative Decree No. 231/2001 – acts for the protection and promotion of the above mentioned principles and every six months presents a report on the implementation of the Code to the Internal Control Committee, to the Board of Statutory Auditors and to the Chairman and the CEO, who reports on this to the Board of Directors.

 

 

167


PART III

Item 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Not applicable.

 

 

Item 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Index to Financial Statements:

 

Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

F-1

Consolidated Balance Sheet atas of December 31, 20082009 and 20072008

F-3

Consolidated profit and loss account for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 2007 and 20062007

F-4

Consolidated Statements of comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007F-5
Consolidated Statements of changes in shareholder’s equity for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 2007 and 20062007

F-5F-6

Consolidated Statement of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 2007 and 20062007

F-7F-9

Supplemental cash flow information for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 2007 and 20062007

F-9F-11

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

F-24F-28

 

 

Item 19. EXHIBITS

1. By-laws of Eni SpA

8. List of subsidiaries

11. Code of Ethics

Certifications:

12.1. Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act


12.2. Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act

13.1. Certification furnished pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act (such certificate is not deemed filed for purpose of Section 18 of the Exchange Act and not incorporated by reference with any filing under the Securities Act)


13.2. Certification furnished pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act (such certificate is not deemed filed for purpose of Section 18 of the Exchange Act and not incorporated by reference with any filing under the Securities Act)

15.a(i) Consent of DeGolyer and MacNaughton
15.a(ii) Consent of Ryder Scott Co
15.a(iii) Report of DeGolyer and MacNaughton
15.a(iv) Report of Ryder Scott Co
15.a(v) Report of DeGolyer and MacNaughton

16.f Agreement letter of PwC

168


SIGNATURES

The registrant certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and has duly caused this annual report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: May 14, 2009

Eni SpA
/s/ANTONIO CRISTODORO

Antonio Cristodoro
Title: Deputy Corporate Secretary

169


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Eni SpA.

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated profit and loss accounts, consolidated statements of comprehensive income, consolidated statements of changes in shareholders’ equity and consolidated statements of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eni SpA and its subsidiaries at December 31, 20082009 and December 31, 2007,2008, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20082009 in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008,2009, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing in Item 15 Controls and Procedures of the 20082009 Annual Report to Shareholders. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

F-1


A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

F-1



Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers SpA

Rome, Italy
May 14, 2009April 26, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

F-2


CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(euro million)

  Dec. 31, 20072008 Dec. 31, 20082009
  
 
   Note  

Total amount

of which with related parties

Total amount

  Total amount

of which with related parties

    
 
 
 
ASSETS            
Current assets            
Cash and cash equivalents (1) 2,114    1,939   
Other financial assets held for trading or available for sale: (2)          
- equity instruments   2,476    2,741   
- other securities   433    495   
    2,909    3,236   
Trade and other receivables (3) 20,676  1,616 22,222  1,539
Inventories (4) 5,499    6,082   
Current tax assets (5) 703    170   
Other current tax assets (6) 833    1,130   
Other current assets (7) 1,080    2,349  59
Total current assets   33,814    37,128   
Non-current assets            
Property, plant and equipment (8) 46,919    55,833   
Other assets (9) 563        
Inventory - compulsory stock (10) 2,171    1,196   
Intangible assets (11) 7,551    11,037   
Equity-accounted investments (12) 5,639    5,471   
Other investments (12) 472    410   
Other financial assets (13) 923  87 1,134  356
Deferred tax assets (14) 1,915    2,912   
Other non-current receivables (15) 1,110  16 1,401  21
Total non-current assets   67,263    79,394   
Assets classified as held for sale (26) 383    68   
TOTAL ASSETS   101,460    116,590   
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY            
Current liabilities            
Short-term debt (16) 7,763  131 6,359  153
Current portion of long-term debt (21) 737    549   
Trade and other payables (17) 17,116  1,021 20,515  1,253
Income taxes payable (18) 1,688    1,949   
Other taxes payable (19) 1,383    1,660   
Other current liabilities (20) 1,556  4 4,319  4
Total current liabilities   30,243    35,351   
Non-current liabilities            
Long-term debt (21) 11,330  16 13,929  9
Provisions for contingencies (22) 8,486    9,573   
Provisions for employee benefits (23) 935    947   
Deferred tax liabilities (24) 5,471    5,742   
Other non-current liabilities (25) 2,031  57 2,538  53
Total non-current liabilities   28,253    32,729   
Liabilities directly associated with the assets classified as held for sale (26) 97        
TOTAL LIABILITIES   58,593    68,080   
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (27)          
Minority interest   2,439    4,074   
Eni shareholders’ equity            
Share capital   4,005    4,005   
Reserves   34,610    40,722   
Treasury shares   (5,999)   (6,757)  
Interim dividend   (2,199)   (2,359)  
Net profit   10,011    8,825   
Total Eni shareholders’ equity   40,428    44,436   
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY   42,867    48,510   
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY   101,460    116,590   




ASSETS            
Current assets            
Cash and cash equivalents (1) 1,939    1,608   
Other financial assets held for trading or available for sale: (2)          
- equity instruments   2,741        
- other securities   495    348   
    3,236    348   
Trade and other receivables (3) 22,222  1,539 20,348  1,355
Inventories (4) 6,082    5,495   
Current tax assets (5) 170    753   
Other current tax assets (6) 1,130    1,270   
Other current assets (7) 1,870  59 1,307  9
Total current assets   36,649    31,129   
Non-current assets            
Property, plant and equipment (8) 55,933    59,765   
Inventory - compulsory stock (9) 1,196    1,736   
Intangible assets (10) 11,019    11,469   
Equity-accounted investments (11) 5,471    5,828   
Other investments (11) 410    416   
Other financial assets (12) 1,134  356 1,148  438
Deferred tax assets (13) 2,912    3,558   
Other non-current receivables (14) 1,881  21 1,938  40
Total non-current assets   79,956    85,858   
Assets held for sale (25) 68    542   
TOTAL ASSETS   116,673    117,529   
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY            
Current liabilities            
Short-term debt (15) 6,359  153 3,545  147
Current portion of long-term debt (20) 549    3,191   
Trade and other payables (16) 20,515  1,253 19,174  1,241
Income taxes payable (17) 1,949    1,291   
Other taxes payable (18) 1,660    1,431   
Other current liabilities (19) 3,863  4 1,856  5
Total current liabilities   34,895    30,488   
Non-current liabilities            
Long-term debt (20) 13,929  9 18,064   
Provisions for contingencies (21) 9,506    10,319   
Provisions for employee benefits (22) 947    944   
Deferred tax liabilities (23) 5,784    4,907   
Other non-current liabilities (24) 3,102  53 2,480  49
Total non-current liabilities   33,268    36,714   
Liabilities directly associated with assets held for sale (25)      276   
TOTAL LIABILITIES   68,163    67,478   
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (26)          
Minority interest   4,074    3,978   
Eni shareholders' equity            
Share capital   4,005    4,005   
Reserves   40,722    46,269   
Treasury shares   (6,757)   (6,757)  
Interim dividend   (2,359)   (1,811)  
Net profit   8,825    4,367   
Total Eni shareholders' equity   44,436    46,073   
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY   48,510    50,051   
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY   116,673    117,529   
    

 
 

 

F-3


CONSOLIDATED PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT
(euro million except as otherwise stated)

  20062007 20082009
  
 
 
   Note  

Total amount

of which with related parties

Total amount

of which with related parties

Total amount

of which with related parties

    
 
 
 
 
 
REVENUES                              
Net sales from operations 

(30)

 

86,105

 

3,974

 

87,256

 

4,198

 

108,148

 

5,048

  (29) 87,204 4,198 108,082 5,048 83,227 3,300 
Other income and revenues   

783

   

827

   

720

 

39

    833   728 39 1,118 26 
Total revenues   

86,888

   

88,083

   

108,868

      88,037   108,810   84,345   
OPERATING EXPENSES 

(31)

              (30)             
Purchases, services and other   

57,490

 

2,720

 

58,179

 

3,777

 

76,408

 

6,298

    58,133 3,777 76,350 6,298 58,351 4,999 
- of which non-recurring charge   

239

   

91

   

(21

)      91   (21)   250   
Payroll and related costs   

3,650

   

3,800

   

4,004

      3,800   4,004   4,181   
- of which non-recurring income       

(83

)          (83)           
Depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairments   

6,421

   

7,236

   

9,815

   
OTHER OPERATING (CHARGE) INCOME   (129) 10 (124) 58 55 44 
DEPRECIATION, DEPLETION, AMORTIZATIONAND IMPAIRMENTS   7,236   9,815   9,813   
OPERATING PROFIT   

19,327

   

18,868

   

18,641

      18,739   18,517   12,055   
FINANCE INCOME (EXPENSE) 

(32)

              (31)             
Finance income   

3,749

 

58

 

4,445

 

49

 

7,985

 

42

    4,445 49 7,985 42 5,950 27 
Finance expense   

(3,971

) 

(18

) 

(4,554

) 

(20

) 

(8,198

) 

(17

)   (4,554) (20) (8,198) (17) (6,497) (4)
Derivative financial instruments   

383

   

26

 

10

 

(551

) 

58

    155   (427)   (4)   
   

161

   

(83

)   

(764

)      46   (640)   (551)   
INCOME FROM INVESTMENTS 

(33)

              (32)             
Share of profit (loss) of equity-accounted investments   

795

   

773

   

640

      773   640   393   
Other gain (loss) from investments   

108

   

470

   

733

      470   733   176   
   

903

   

1,243

   

1,373

      1,243   1,373   569   
PROFIT BEFORE INCOME TAXES   

20,391

   

20,028

   

19,250

      20,028   19,250   12,073   
Income taxes 

(34)

 

(10,568

)   

(9,219

)   

(9,692

)    (33) (9,219)   (9,692)   (6,756)   
Net profit   

9,823

   

10,809

   

9,558

      10,809   9,558   5,317   
Attributable to               
Eni   

9,217

   

10,011

   

8,825

   
Minority interest 

(27)

 

606

   

798

   

733

   
Attributable to:               
- Eni   10,011   8,825   4,367   
- Minority interest (26) 798   733   950   
   

9,823

   

10,809

   

9,558

      10,809   9,558   5,317   
Earnings per share attributable to Eni (euro per share) 

(35)

              (34)             
Basic   

2.49

   

2.73

   

2.43

      2.73   2.43   1.21   
Diluted   

2.49

   

2.73

   

2.43

      2.73   2.43   1.21   
   

 

 

 

 

 

F-4


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(euro million)

  Note 2007 2008 2009
    
 
 
Net profit   10,809  9,558  5,317 
Other items of comprehensive income           
Foreign currency translation differences   (1,980) 1,077  (869)
Change in the fair value of cash flow hedging derivatives (26) (2,237) 1,969  (481)
Change in the fair value of available-for-sale securities (26) (6) 3  1 
Share of "Other comprehensive income" on equity-accounted entities         2 
Taxation (26) 869  (767) 202 
Other comprehensive income   (3,354) 2,282  (1,145)
Total comprehensive income   7,455  11,840  4,172 
Attributable to:           
- Eni   6,708  11,148  3,245 
- Minority interest   747  692  927 
    7,455  11,840  4,172 
    
 
 



F-4

F-5


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(euro million)million euro)

 

Eni shareholders’ equity

 
 
 
  

Share capital

 

Legal reserve of Eni SpA

 

Reserve for treasury shares

 

Reserve related to the fair value of cash flow hedging derivatives net of the tax effect

Reserve related to the fair value of available-for-sale securities net of the tax effect

Other reserves

 

Cumulative
currency translation
differences

 

Treasury shares

 

Retained earnings

 

Interim dividend

 

Net profit for the year

 

Total

 

Minority interest

 

Total shareholders’ equity

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance at December 31, 2006 4,005  959  7,262  400  (398) (5,374) 25,168  (2,210) 9,217  39,029  2,170  41,199 
Net profit for the year                         10,011  10,011  798  10,809 
Gains (losses) recognized directly in equity                                    
Change in the fair value of available-for-sale securities          (4)                (4)    (4)
Change in the fair value of cash flow hedge derivatives          (1,370)                (1,370)    (1,370)
Foreign currency translation differences          25  (1,954)             (1,929) (51) (1,980)
           (1,349) (1,954)             (3,303) (51) (3,354)
Total recognized income and (expense) for the year          (1,349) (1,954)          10,011  6,708  747  7,455 
Transactions with shareholders                                    
Dividend distribution of Eni SpA (euro 0.65 per share in settlement of 2006 interim dividend of euro 0.60 per share)                      2,210  (4,594) (2,384)    (2,384)
Interim dividend distribution of Eni SpA (euro 0.60 per share)                      (2,199)    (2,199)    (2,199)
Dividend distribution of other companies                               (289) (289)
Payments by minority shareholders                               1  1 
Allocation of 2006 net profit                   4,623     (4,623)         
Shares repurchased                (680)          (680)    (680)
Treasury shares sold under incentive plans for Eni managers       (55) 35     55  11        46     46 
Difference between the carrying amount and strike price of stock options exercised by Eni managers                   9        9     9 
        (55) 35     (625) 4,643  11  (9,217) (5,208) (288) (5,496)
Other changes in shareholders’ equity                                    
Net effect related to the purchase of treasury shares by Saipem SpA and Snam Rete Gas SpA                               (201) (201)
Cost related to stock option and stock grant                   18        18     18 
Foreign currency translation differences on the distribution of dividends and other changes             119     (238)       (119) 11  (108)
              119     (220)       (101) (190) (291)
Balance at December 31, 2007 4,005  959  7,207  (914) (2,233) (5,999) 29,591  (2,199) 10,011  40,428  2,439  42,867 










 
 
Balance at December 31, 2006 4,005  959  7,262  1  6  393  (398) (5,374) 25,168  (2,210) 9,217  39,029  2,170  41,199 
Net profit for the year                               10,011  10,011  798  10,809 
Other items of comprehensive income                                          
Change in the fair value of cash flow hedge derivatives net of the tax effect          (1,370)                      (1,370)    (1,370)
Change in the fair value of available-for-sale securities net of the tax effect             (4)                   (4)    (4)
Foreign currency translation differences          25        (1,835)    (119)       (1,929) (51) (1,980)
           (1,345) (4)    (1,835)    (119)       (3,303) (51) (3,354)
Total recognized income and (expense) for the year          (1,345) (4)    (1,835)    (119)    10,011  6,708  747  7,455 
Transactions with shareholders                                          
Dividend distribution of Eni SpA (euro 0.65 per share in settlement of 2006 interim dividend of euro 0.60 per share)                            2,210  (4,594) (2,384)    (2,384)
Interim dividend distribution of Eni SpA (euro 0.60 per share)                            (2,199)    (2,199)    (2,199)
Dividend distribution of other companies                                     (289) (289)
Payments by minority shareholders                                     1  1 
Allocation of 2006 net profit                         4,623     (4,623)         
Shares repurchased                      (680)          (680)    (680)
Net effect related to the purchase of treasury shares by Saipem SpA and Snam Rete Gas SpA                                     (201) (201)
Treasury shares sold under incentive plans for Eni managers       (55)       35     55  11        46     46 
Difference between the carrying amount and strike price of stock options exercised by Eni managers                         9        9     9 
        (55)       35     (625) 4,643  11  (9,217) (5,208) (489) (5,697)
Other changes in shareholders’ equity                                          
Cost related to stock options and stock grant                         18        18     18 
Other changes                         (119)       (119) 11  (108)
                          (101)       (101) 11  (90)
Balance at December 31, 2007 4,005  959  7,207  (1,344) 2  428  (2,233) (5,999) 29,591  (2,199) 10,011  40,428  2,439  42,867 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

F-5F-6


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY continued
(euro million)million euro)

 

Eni shareholders’ equity

 
 
 
  

Share capital

 

Legal reserve of Eni SpA

 

Reserve for treasury shares

 

Reserve related to the fair value of cash flow hedging derivatives net of the tax effect

Reserve related to the fair value of available-for-sale securities net of the tax effect

Other reserves

 

Cumulative
currency translation
differences

 

Treasury shares

 

Retained earnings

 

Interim dividend

 

Net profit for the year

 

Total

 

Minority interest

 

Total shareholders’ equity

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Balance at December 31, 2007  

4,005

   

959

   

7,207

   

(914

)  

(2,233

)  

(5,999

)  

29,591

   

(2,199

)  

10,011

   

40,428

   

2,439

   

42,867

  4,005 959 7,207 (1,344) 2 428 (2,233) (5,999) 29,591 (2,199) 10,011 40,428 2,439 42,867 
Net profit for the year  

  

  

  

  

  

   

  

   

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

8,825

  

8,825

  

733

  

9,558

                      8,825 8,825 733 9,558 
Gains (losses) recognized directly in equity  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

                               
Change in the fair value of available-for-sale securities (Note 27)  

  

  

  

  

  

  

2

  

  

   

  

  

  

  

  

      

  

      

2

   

  

      

2

  
Change in the fair value of cash flow hedge derivatives (Note 27)  

  

  

  

  

  

  

1,255

  

  

  

  

  

  

   

  

  

  

  

1,255

  

(52

)  

1,203

  
Change in the fair value of cash flow hedge derivatives net of the tax effect       1,255               1,255 (52) 1,203 
Change in the fair value of available-for-sale securities net of the tax effect         2             2   2 
Foreign currency translation differences  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

1,066

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

1,066

  

11

  

1,077

         25     1,264   (223)     1,066 11 1,077 
  

  

  

  

  

  

  

1,257

  

1,066

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

    

  

2,323

  

(41

)  

2,282

         1,280 2   1,264   (223)     2,323 (41) 2,282 
Total recognized income and (expense) for the year  

  

  

  

  

  

  

1,257

  

1,066

  

    

  

  

  

  

  

8,825

  

11,148

  

692

  

11,840

         1,280 2   1,264   (223)   8,825 11,148 692 11,840 
Transactions with shareholders  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  
Transactions with shareholders:                             
Dividend distribution of Eni SpA (euro 0.70 per share in settlement of 2007 interim dividend of euro 0.60 per share)  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

2,199

  

(4,750

)  

(2,551

)  

  

  

(2,551

)                   2,199 (4,750) (2,551)   (2,551)
Interim dividend distribution of Eni SpA (euro 0.65 per share)  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

(2,359

)  

  

  

(2,359

)  

  

  

(2,359

)                   (2,359)   (2,359)   (2,359)
Dividend distribution of other companies  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

(297

)  

(297

)                         (297) (297)
Payments by minority shareholders  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

20

  

20

                           20 20 
Allocation of 2007 net profit  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

5,261

  

  

  

(5,261

)  

  

  

  

  

  

                   5,261   (5,261)       
Shares repurchased  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

(778

)  

  

  

  

  

  

  

(778

)  

  

  

(778

)               (778)       (778)   (778)
Treasury shares sold under incentive plans for Eni managers  

  

  

    

  

(20

)  

13

  

  

  

20

  

(1

)  

  

  

  

  

12

  

  

  

12

       (20)     13   20 (1)     12   12 
Difference between the carrying amount and strike price of stock options exercised by Eni managers  

    

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

2

  

  

  

  

  

2

  

  

  

2

                   2     2   2 
Net effect related to the purchase of treasury shares by Saipem SpA                         (31) (31)
Put option granted to Publigaz Scrl (the Distrigas NV minority shareholder)           (1,495)           (1,495)   (1,495)
Minority interest recognized following the acquisition of Distrigas NV and Hindustan Oil Exploration Co Ltd                         1,261 1,261 
  

  

  

  

  

(20

)  

13

  

  

  

(758

)  

5,262

  

(160

)  

(10,011

)  

(5,674

)  

(277

)  

(5,951

)     (20)     (1,482)   (758) 5,262 (160) (10,011) (7,169) 953 (6,216)
Other changes in shareholders’ equity  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

                              
Net effect related to the purchase of treasury shares by Saipem SpA  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

(31

)  

(31

)
Cost related to stock option and stock grant 

  

   

  

   

  

   

  

   

  

   

  

   

18

   

  

   

  

   

18

   

  

   

18

  
Put option granted to Publigaz (the Distrigas minority shareholder)  

  

  

  

  

  

  

(1,495

)  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

(1,495

)  

  

  

(1,495

)
Minority interest recognized following the acquisition of Distrigas NV and Hindustan Oil Exploration Co Ltd  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

1,261

  

1,261

  
Foreign currency translation differences on the distribution of dividends and other changes  

  

  

  

  

  

  

(1

)  

198

  

  

  

(186

)  

  

  

  

  

11

  

(10

)  

1

  
Cost related to stock options and stock grant                 18     18   18 
Other changes       (26)         37     11 (10) 1 
  

  

  

  

  

  

  

(1,496

)  

198

  

  

  

(168

)  

  

  

  

  

(1,466

)  

1,220

  

(246

)       (26)         55     29 (10) 19 
Balance at December 31, 2008 (Note 27)  

4,005

   

959

   

7,187

   

(1,140

)  

(969

)  

(6,757

)  

34,685

   

(2,359

)  

8,825

   

44,436

   

4,074

   

48,510

 
Balance at December 31, 2008 (Note 26) 4,005 959 7,187 (90) 4 (1,054) (969) (6,757) 34,685 (2,359) 8,825 44,436 4,074 48,510 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

F-7


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITYcontinued
(million euro)

Eni shareholders’ equity


Share capital

Legal reserve of Eni SpA

Reserve for treasury shares

Reserve related to the fair value of cash flow hedging derivatives net of the tax effect

Reserve related to the fair value of available-for-sale securities net of the tax effect

Other reserves

Cumulative currency translation
differences

Treasury shares

Retained earnings

Interim dividend

Net profit for the year

Total

Minority interest

Total shareholders’ equity

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

F-6


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(euro million)

  

    Note 

 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

    
 
 
Net profit of the year   

9,823

  

10,809

  

9,558

 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization 

(31)

 

6,153

  

7,029

  

8,422

 
Revaluations, net   

(386

) 

(494

) 

2,560

 
Net change in provisions for contingencies   

(86

) 

(122

) 

414

 
Net change in the provisions for employee benefits   

72

  

(67

) 

(8

)
Gain on disposal of assets, net   

(59

) 

(309

) 

(219

)
Dividend income 

(33)

 

(98

) 

(170

) 

(510

)
Interest income   

(387

) 

(603

) 

(592

)
Interest expense   

346

  

523

  

809

 
Exchange differences   

6

  

(119

) 

(319

)
Income taxes 

(34)

 

10,568

  

9,219

  

9,692

 
Cash generated from operating profit before changes in working capital   

25,952

  

25,696

  

29,807

 
(Increase) decrease:           
- inventories   

(953

) 

(1,117

) 

(801

)
- trade and other receivables   

(1,952

) 

(655

) 

(974

)
- other assets   

(315

) 

(362

) 

162

 
- trade and other payables   

2,146

  

360

  

2,318

 
- other liabilities   

50

  

107

  

1,507

 
Cash from operations   

24,928

  

24,029

  

32,019

 
Dividends received   

848

  

658

  

1,150

 
Interest received   

395

  

333

  

266

 
Interest paid   

(294

) 

(555

) 

(852

)
Income taxes paid, net of tax receivables received   

(8,876

) 

(8,948

) 

(10,782

)
Net cash provided from operating activities   

17,001

  

15,517

  

21,801

 
- of which with related parties 

(37)

 

2,206

  

549

  

(62

)
Investing activities:           
- tangible assets 

(8)

 

(5,963

) 

(8,364

) 

(12,082

)
- intangible assets 

(11)

 

(1,870

) 

(2,229

) 

(2,480

)
- consolidated subsidiaries and businesses   

(46

) 

(4,759

) 

(3,634

)
- investments 

(12)

 

(42

) 

(4,890

) 

(385

)
- securities   

(49

) 

(76

) 

(152

)
- financing receivables   

(516

) 

(1,646

) 

(710

)
- change in payables and receivables in relation to capital expenditures and capitalized depreciation   

(26

) 

185

  

367

 
Cash flow from investments   

(8,512

) 

(21,779

) 

(19,076

)
Disposals:           
- tangible assets   

231

  

165

  

318

 
- intangible assets   

18

  

35

  

2

 
- consolidated subsidiaries and businesses   

8

  

56

  

149

 
- investments   

36

  

403

  

510

 
- securities   

382

  

491

  

145

 
- financing receivables   

794

  

545

  

1,293

 
- change in payables and receivables in relation to disposals   

(8

) 

(13

) 

(299

)
Cash flow from disposals   

1,461

  

1,682

  

2,118

 
Net cash used in investing activities (*)   

(7,051

) 

(20,097

) 

(16,958

)
- of which with related parties 

(37)

 

(686

) 

(822

) 

(1,598

)

 
 
Balance at December 31, 2008 (Note 26) 4,005  959  7,187  (90) 4  (1,054) (969) (6,757) 34,685  (2,359) 8,825  44,436  4,074  48,510 
Net profit for the year                               4,367  4,367  950  5,317 
Gains (losses) recognized directly in equity                                          
Change in the fair value of cash flow hedge derivatives net of the tax effect (Note 26)          (279)                      (279)    (279)
Change in the fair value of available-for-sale securities net of the tax effect (Note 26)             1                    1     1 
Share of "Other comprehensive income" on equity-accounted entities                2                 2     2 
Foreign currency translation differences          1        (696)    (151)       (846) (23) (869)
           (278) 1  2  (696)    (151)       (1,122) (23) (1,145)
Total recognized income and (expense) for the year          (278) 1  2  (696)    (151)    4,367  3,245  927  4,172 
Transactions with shareholders:                                          
Dividend distribution of Eni SpA (euro 0.65 per share in settlement of 2007 interim dividend of euro 0.65 per share)                            2,359  (4,714) (2,355)    (2,355)
Interim dividend distribution of Eni SpA (euro 0.50 per share)                            (1,811)    (1,811)    (1,811)
Dividend distribution of other companies                                     (350) (350)
Payments by minority shareholders                                     1,560  1,560 
Allocation of 2008 net profit                         4,111     (4,111)         
Put option granted to Publigaz Scrl (the Distrigas NV minority shareholder)                1,495                 1,495     1,495 
Effect related to the purchase of Italgas SpA and Stoccaggi Gas SpA by Snam Rete Gas SpA                1,086                 1,086  (1,086)   
Minority interest acquired following the mandatory tender offer and the squeeze-out on the shares of Distrigas NV                                     (1,146) (1,146)
                 2,581        4,111  548  (8,825) (1,585) (1,022) (2,607)
Other changes in shareholders’ equity                                          
Utilization of the reserve for the acquisition of treasury shares       (430)       1        429                
Cost related to stock options and stock grant                         13        13     13 
Stock option expired                         (7)       (7)    (7)
Other changes          (71)    (38)       80        (29) (1) (30)
        (430) (71)    (37)       515        (23) (1) (24)
Balance at December 31, 2009 (Note 26) 4,005  959  6,757  (439) 5  1,492  (1,665) (6,757) 39,160  (1,811) 4,367  46,073  3,978  50,051 
  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

F-7F-8


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(euro million)

  

    Note 

 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

    
 
 
Net profit of the year   10,809  9,558  5,317 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization (30) 7,029  8,422  8,762 
Impairments and other, net   (494) 2,560  495 
Net change in provisions for contingencies   (122) 414  574 
Net change in the provisions for employee benefits   (67) (8) 16 
Gain on disposal of assets, net   (309) (219) (226)
Dividend income (32) (170) (510) (164)
Interest income   (603) (592) (352)
Interest expense   523  809  603 
Exchange differences   (119) (319) (156)
Income taxes (33) 9,219  9,692  6,756 
Cash generated from operating profit before changes in working capital   25,696  29,807  21,625 
(Increase) decrease:           
- inventories   (1,117) (801) 52 
- trade and other receivables   (655) (974) (19)
- other assets   (362) 162  (472)
- trade and other payables   360  2,318  (1,201)
- other liabilities   107  1,507  (129)
Cash from operations   24,029  32,019  19,856 
Dividends received   658  1,150  576 
Interest received   333  266  594 
Interest paid   (555) (852) (583)
Income taxes paid, net of tax receivables received   (8,948) (10,782) (9,307)
Net cash provided from operating activities   15,517  21,801  11,136 
- of which with related parties (36) 549  (62) (1,188)
Investing activities:           
- tangible assets (8) (8,364) (12,082) (12,032)
- intangible assets (10) (2,229) (2,480) (1,663)
- consolidated subsidiaries and businesses   (4,759) (3,634) (25)
- investments (11) (4,890) (385) (230)
- securities   (76) (152) (2)
- financing receivables   (1,646) (710) (972)
- change in payables and receivables in relation to investments and capitalized depreciation   185  367  (97)
Cash flow from investments   (21,779) (19,076) (15,021)
Disposals:           
- tangible assets   165  318  111 
- intangible assets   35  2  265 
- consolidated subsidiaries and businesses   56  149    
- investments   403  510  3,219 
- securities   491  145  164 
- financing receivables   545  1,293  861 
- change in payables and receivables in relation to disposals   (13) (299) 147 
Cash flow from disposals   1,682  2,118  4,767 
Net cash used in investing activities (*)   (20,097) (16,958) (10,254)
- of which with related parties (36) (822) (1,598) (1,262)
    

 

 

F-9


CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS continued
(euro million)

  

    Note 

 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

    
 
 
Proceeds from long-term debt   

2,888

  

6,589

  

3,774

 
Repayments of long-term debt   

(2,621

) 

(2,295

) 

(2,104

)
Increase (decrease) in short-term debt   

(949

) 

4,467

  

(690

)
    

(682

) 

8,761

  

980

 
Net capital contributions by minority shareholders   

22

  

1

  

20

 
Net acquisition of treasury shares different from Eni SpA   

(477

) 

(340

) 

(50

)
Acquisition of additional interests in consolidated subsidiaries   

(7

) 

(16

)   
Sale of additional interests in consolidated subsidiaries   

35

       
Dividends paid to Eni’s shareholders   

(4,610

) 

(4,583

) 

(4,910

)
Dividends paid to minority interest   

(222

) 

(289

) 

(297

)
Net purchase of treasury shares   

(1,156

) 

(625

) 

(768

)
Net cash used in financing activities   

(7,097

) 

2,909

  

(5,025

)
- of which with related parties 

(37)

 

(57

) 

20

  

14

 
Effect of change in consolidation (inclusion/exclusion of significant/insignificant subsidiaries)   

(4

) 

(40

) 

(1

)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents   

(197

) 

(160

) 

8

 
Net cash flow for the period   

2,652

  

(1,871

) 

(175

)
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of year 

(1)

 

1,333

  

3,985

  

2,114

 
Cash and cash equivalents - end of year 

(1)

 

3,985

  

2,114

  

1,939

 



  

    Note 

 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

    
 
 
Proceeds from long-term debt   6,589  3,774  8,774 
Repayments of long-term debt   (2,295) (2,104) (2,044)
Increase (decrease) in short-term debt   4,467  (690) (2,889)
    8,761  980  3,841 
Net capital contributions by minority shareholders   1  20  1,551 
Net acquisition of treasury shares different from Eni SpA   (340) (50) 9 
Acquisition of additional interests in consolidated subsidiaries   (16)    (2,068)
Dividends paid to Eni's shareholders   (4,583) (4,910) (4,166)
Dividends paid to minority interest   (289) (297) (350)
Net purchase of treasury shares   (625) (768)   
Net cash used in financing activities   2,909  (5,025) (1,183)
- of which with related parties (36) 20  14  (14)
Effect of change in consolidation (inclusion/exclusion of significant/insignificant subsidiaries)   (40) (1)   
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents and other changes   (160) 8  (30)
Net cash flow for the period   (1,871) (175) (331)
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of year (1) 3,985  2,114  1,939 
Cash and cash equivalents - end of year (1) 2,114  1,939  1,608 
    

 

 

      
(*)  Net cash used in investing activities included investments in certain financial assets to absorb temporary surpluses of cash or as part of our ordinary management of financing activities. Due to their nature and the circumstance that they are very liquid, these financial assets are netted against finance debt in determining net borrowings. For the definition of net borrowings, see "Item 5 – Operating and Financial Review and Prospects""Financial Review" in the "Report of the Directors".
Cash flows of such investments were as follows:
      
(euro million) 

    

 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

    
 
 
(euro million) 

    

 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

    
 
 
Financing investments:              
- securities 

(44

) 

(75

) 

(74

) (75) (74) (2)
- financing receivables 

(134

) 

(970

) 

(99

) (970) (99) (36)
 

(178

) 

(1,045

) 

(173

) (1,045) (173) (38)
Disposal of financing investments:              
- securities 

340

 

419

 

145

  419 145 123 
- financing receivables 

54

 

147

 

939

  147 939 311 
 

394

 

566

 

1,084

  566 1,084 434 
Net cash flows from financing activities 

216

 

(479

) 

216

  (479) 911 396 
    
 
 

F-8F-10


SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
(euro million)million euro)

  

   

 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

    
 
 
Effect of investment of companies included in consolidation and businesses         
Current assets 

68

  

398

  

1,938

 
Non-current assets 

130

  

5,590

  

7,442

 
Net borrowings 

53

  

1

  

1,543

 
Current and non-current liabilities 

(92

) 

(972

) 

(3,598

)
Net effect of investments 

159

  

5,017

  

7,325

 
Minority interests       

(1,261

)
Fair value of investments held before the acquisition of control    

(13

) 

(601

)
Sale of unconsolidated entities controlled by Eni 

(60

)      
Purchase price 

99

  

5,004

  

5,463

 
less:         
Cash and cash equivalents 

(53

) 

(245

) 

(1,829

)
Cash flow on investments 

46

  

4,759

  

3,634

 
Effect of disposal of consolidated subsidiaries and businesses         
Current assets 

9

  

73

  

277

 
Non-current assets 

1

  

20

  

299

 
Net borrowings 

(1

) 

26

  

(118

)
Current and non-current liabilities 

(4

) 

(94

) 

(270

)
Net effect of disposals 

5

  

25

  

188

 
Gain on disposal 

3

  

33

  

25

 
Minority interest       

(1

)
Selling price 

8

  

58

  

212

 
less:         
Cash and cash equivalents    

(2

) 

(63

)
Cash flow on disposals 

8

  

56

  

149

 



  

   

 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

    
 
 
Effect of investment of companies included in consolidation and businesses         
Current assets 398  1,938  7 
Non-current assets 5,590  7,442  47 
Net borrowings 1  1,543  4 
Current and non-current liabilities (972) (3,598) (29)
Net effect of investments 5,017  7,325  29 
Minority interests    (1,261)   
Fair value of investments held before the acquisition of control (13) (601)   
Sale of unconsolidated entities controlled by Eni         
Purchase price 5,004  5,463  29 
less:         
Cash and cash equivalents (245) (1,829) (4)
Cash flow on investments 4,759  3,634  25 
Effect of disposal of consolidated subsidiaries and businesses         
Current assets 73  277    
Non-current assets 20  299    
Net borrowings 26  (118)   
Current and non-current liabilities (94) (270)   
Net effect of disposals 25  188    
Gain on disposal 33  25    
Minority interest    (1)   
Selling price 58  212    
less:         
Cash and cash equivalents (2) (63)   
Cash flow on disposals 56  149    
  

 

 

Transactions that did not produce cash flows
Acquisition of equity investments in exchange of businesses contribution:

(euro million) 

   

 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

    
 
 
Current assets 

23

    
Non-current assets 

213

  

38

 
Net borrowings 

(44

) 

(4

)
Long-term and short-term liabilities 

(53

)   
Net effect of contribution 

139

  

34

 
Minority interest 

(36

)   
Gain on contribution 

18

    
Acquisition of investments 

121

  

34

 
(euro million) 

   

 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

    
 
 
Current assets    
 
Non-current assets38
Net borrowings(4)
Long-term and short-term liabilities
Net effect of contribution34
Minority interest
Gain on contribution
Acquisition of investments34


 



F-9F-11


Basis of presentation

The Consolidated Financial Statements of Eni Group for the Annual Report on Form 20-F have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). Oil and natural gas exploration and production activity is accounted for in conformity with internationally accepted accounting principles. Specifically, this concerns the determination of the amortization expenses using the unit-of-production method and the recognition of the production-sharing agreements and buy-back contracts. The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis except for certain items that under IFRS must be recognized at fair value as described in the summary of significant accounting policies paragraph.

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Eni SpA and the accounts of controlled subsidiary companies where the company holds the right to directly or indirectly exercise control, determine financial and management decisions and obtain economic and financial benefits.

Immaterial subsidiaries are not consolidated. A subsidiary is generally considered to be immaterial when it does not exceed two of the following three limits: (i) total assets or liabilities: euro 3,125 thousand; (ii) total revenues: euro 6,250 thousand; and (iii) average number of employees: 50 units. Moreover, companies for which consolidation does not produce significant economic and financial effects are not consolidated. These are usuallyessentially entities acting as sole-operator in the management of oil and gas contracts on behalf of companies participating in a joint venture. These are financed proportionately based on a budget approved by the participating companies upon presentation of periodical reports of proceeds and expenses. Costs and revenues and other operating data (production, reserves, etc.) of the project, as well as the obligations arising from the project, are recognized proportionally in the financial statements of the companies involved. The effects of these exclusions are immaterial1.

Immaterial subsidiaries excluded from consolidation, jointly controlled entities, associates and other interests are accounted for as described below under the item "Financial fixed assets".

Subsidiaries’ financial statements are audited by the independent auditors who examine and certify also the information required for the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The 20082009 Consolidated Financial Statements approved by Eni’s Board of Directors on March 13, 200911, 2010 were audited by the independent auditor PricewaterhouseCoopers SpA (PwC). The independent auditor of Eni SpA, as the main auditor of the Group, is in charge of the auditing activities of the subsidiaries, unless this is incompatible with local laws, and, to the extent allowed under Italian legislation, of the work of other independent auditors.

Amounts in the notes to these financial statements are expressed in millions of euros (euro million).

 

Principles of consolidation

Interest in consolidated companies
Assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses related to fully consolidated subsidiaries are wholly incorporated in the Consolidated Financial Statements; the book value of interests in these subsidiaries is eliminated against the corresponding share of the shareholders’ equity by attributing to each of the balance sheet items its fair value at the acquisition date.

When acquired, the net equity of controlled subsidiaries is initially recognized at fair value. The excess of the purchase price of an acquired entity over the total fair value assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed is recognized as goodwill; negative goodwill is recognized in the profit and loss account.

Equity and net profit of minority shareholders are included in specific lines of the financial statements; this share of equity is determined using the fair value of assets and liabilities, excluding any related goodwill, at the time when control is acquired.

The purchase of additional ownership interests in subsidiaries from minority shareholders is recognized as goodwill and represents the excess of the amount paid over the carrying value of the minority interest acquired.

Gains or losses associated with the sale of interests in consolidated subsidiaries are reflected in the profit and loss account for the difference between the proceeds from the sale and the divested portion of net equity.


(1)  According to the requirements of the Framework of international accounting standards, information is material if its omission or misstatement could influence the economic decisions that users make on the basis of the financial statements.

F-10F-12


Inter-company transactions
Inter-company transactions, balances and unrealized gains on transactions between group companies are eliminated. Unrealized losses are not eliminated since they are considered an impairment indicator of the asset transferred.

Foreign currency translation
Financial statements of foreign companies having a functional currency other than the euro are translated into the presentation currency using closing exchange rates for assets and liabilities, historical exchange rates for equity accounts and average rates for the period for the profit and loss account (source: Bank of Italy).

Cumulative exchange rate differences resulting from this translation are recognized in shareholders’ equity under "Other reserves" in proportion to the group’s interest and under "Minority interest" for the portion related to minority shareholders. Cumulative exchange rate differences are charged to the profit and loss account when the investments are sold or the capital employed is repaid.

Financial statements of foreign subsidiaries which are translated into the euro are denominated in the functional currencies of the countries where the entities operate. The U.S. dollar is the prevalent functional currency for the entities that do not adopt the euro.

 

Summary of significant accounting policies

The most significant accounting policies used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements are described below.

Current assets

Held for trading financial assets and available-for-sale financial assets are measured at fair value with gains or losses recognized in the profit and loss account under "Financial income (expense)" and as a component ofto the equity within "Other reserves",reserve related to other comprehensive income, respectively.

In the latter case, changes in fair value recognized under shareholders’in equity are charged to the profit and loss account when they are impaired or realized. The objective evidence that an impairment loss has occurred is verified considering, interalia,inter alia, significant breaches of contracts, serious financial difficulties or the high probability of insolvency of the counterparty; asset write downs are included in the carrying amount2. of the financial asset.

Available-for-sale financial assets include financial assets other than derivative financial instruments, loans and receivables, held for trading financial assets, held-to-maturity financial assets and, if applicable, investments associated with a derivative financial instrument. The latter are stated at fair value with effects of changes in fair value recognized in the profit and loss account rather than in shareholders’ equity (the so-called "fair value option") in order to ensure a match with the recognition in the profit and loss account offor the changes in fair value of the derivative instrument32.

The fair value of financial instruments is determined by market quotations or, in their absence, by the value resulting from the adoption of suitable financial valuation models which take into account all the factors adopted by market operators and prices obtained in similar recent transactions in the market. Interests and dividends on financial assets stated at fair value with gains or losses reflected in the profit and loss account are accounted for on an accrual basis asin "Financial income (expense)" and "Income (expense)"Other gain (loss) from investments", respectively. When the purchase or sale of a financial asset under a contract whose terms require delivery of the asset within the time frame generally established generally by regulation or convention in the market place concerned, the transaction is accounted for on the settlement date. Receivables are carried at amortized cost (see item "Financial fixed assets" below). Transferred financial assets are derecognized when the contractual rights to receive the cash flows of the financial assets are transferred together with the risks and rewards of the ownership.

Inventories, including compulsory stocks and excluding contract work in progress, are stated at the lower of purchase or production cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price less the costs to sell.sell, or, with reference to inventories of crude oil and petroleum products already included in binding sale contracts, the contractual sale price. The cost for inventories of hydrocarbons (crude oil, condensates and natural gas) and petroleum products is


(2)Amendments to IAS 39 "Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement" and to IFRS 7 "Financial Instruments: Disclosures" that permit, with certain criteria met, an entity to reclassify held for trading and available-for-sale financial assets into financial instruments valuated at cost or at amortized cost have not produced any effect for Eni.
(3)  Regarding the investment in OAO Gazprom Neft see Note 2 - Other financial assets held for trading or available for sale.

F-11F-13


gas) and petroleum products is determined by applying the weighted-average cost method on a three-month basis;basis, or monthly, when it is justified by the use and the turnover of inventories of crude oil and petroleum products; the cost for inventories of the Petrochemical segment is determined by applying the weighted-average cost on an annual basis.

Contract work in progress is measured using the cost-to-cost method whereby contract revenue is recognized based on the stage of completion as determined by the cost sustained.incurred. Advances are deducted from inventories within the limits of contractual considerations; any excess of such advances over the value of the inventories is recorded as a liability. Losses related to construction contracts are accrued for once the company becomes aware of such losses. Contract work in progress not yet invoiced, whose payment will be made in a foreign currency, is translated to euro using the current exchange rates at year end and the effect of rate changes is reflected in the profit and loss account.

When take-or-pay clauses are included in long term natural gas purchase contracts, uncollected gas volumes which imply the "pay" clause, measured using the price formulas contractually defined, are recognized under "Other assets" as "deferred costs" as an offset to "Trade payables" or, after the settlement, to "Cash and Cash equivalents".

The deferred costs are charged to the profit and loss account: (i) when natural gas is actually delivered – the related cost is included in the determination of the weighted-average cost of inventories and (ii) for the portion which is not recoverable, when it is not possible to collect gas that was previously uncollected within the contractually defined deadlines. Furthermore, the deferred costs are tested for economic recoverability by comparing the related carrying amount and their net realizable value, measured adopting the same criteria described for inventories.

Hedging instruments are described in the section "Derivative instruments"Instruments".

Non-current assets

Property, plant and equipment43
Tangible assets, including investment properties, are recognized using the cost model and stated at their purchase or self-construction cost including any costs directly attributable to bringing the asset into operation. In addition, when a substantial period of time is required to make the asset ready for use, the purchase price or self-construction cost includes the borrowing costs incurred that could have otherwise been saved had the investment not been made. In the case of a present obligation for the dismantling and removal of assets and the restoration of sites, the carrying value includes, with a corresponding entry to a specific provision, the estimated (discounted) costs to be borneincurred at the moment the asset is retired. Changes in the estimate of the carrying amounts of provisions due to the passage of time and changes in discount rates are recognized under "Provisions for contingencies"54.

Property, plant and equipment is not revalued for financial reporting purposes.

Assets carried under financial leasingleases or concerning arrangements that do not take the legal form of a finance lease but substantially transfer all the risks and rewards of ownership of the leased asset are recognized at fair value, net of taxes due fromto the lessor or, if lower, at the present value of the minimum lease payments. Leased assets are included within property, plant and equipment. A corresponding financial debt payable to the lessor is recognized as a financial liability. These assets are depreciated using the criteria described below. When the renewal is not reasonably certain, leased assets are depreciated over the shorter of the lease term andor the estimated useful life of the asset.

Expenditures on renewals, improvements and transformations which provide additional economic benefits are capitalized to property, plant and equipment.

Tangible assets, from the moment they begin or should begin to be used, are depreciated systematically using a straight-line method over their useful life which is an estimate of the period over which the assets will be used by the company. When tangible assets are composed of more than one significant element with different useful lives, each component is depreciated separately. The amount to be depreciated is represented by the book value reduced byless the estimated net realizable value at the end of the useful life, if it is significant and can be reasonably determined. Land is not depreciated, even when purchased with a building. Tangible assets held for sale are not depreciated but are valued at the lower of book value and fair value less costs of disposal.

Assets that can be used free of charge by third parties are depreciated over the shorter term of the duration of the concession and the useful life of the asset.

Replacement costs of identifiable components in complex assets are capitalized and depreciated over their useful life; the residual book value of the component that has been substituted is charged to the profit and loss account. Expenditures for ordinary maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred.

The carrying value of property, plant and equipment is reviewed for impairment whenever events indicate that the carrying amounts for those assets may not be recoverable. The recoverability of an asset is assessed by comparing its carrying value with the recoverable amount represented by the higher of fair value less costs to sell


(4)(3)  Recognition and evaluation criteria of exploration and production activities are described in the section "Exploration and production activities" below.
(5)(4)  The company recognizes material provisions for the retirement of assets in the Exploration & Production business. No significant asset retirement obligations associated with any legal obligations to retire refining, marketing and transportation (downstream) and chemical long-lived assets are generally recognized, as undetermined settlement dates for asset retirements do not allow a reasonable estimate of the fair value of the associated retirement obligation. The company performs periodic reviews of its downstream and chemical long-lived assets for any changes in facts and circumstances that might require recognition of a retirement obligation.

F-12F-14


depreciated, even when purchased with a building. Tangible assets held for sale are not depreciated (see item "Non-current assets held for sale" below).

Assets that can be used free of charge by third parties are depreciated over the shorter term of the duration of the concession or the asset's useful life.

Replacement costs of identifiable components in complex assets are capitalized and depreciated over their useful life; the residual book value of the component that has been substituted is charged to the profit and loss account. Expenditures for ordinary maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred.

The carrying value of property, plant and equipment is reviewed for impairment whenever events indicate that the carrying amounts for those assets may not be recoverable. The recoverability of an asset is assessed by comparing its carrying value with the recoverable amount which is the higher of fair value less costs to sell or its value in use. If there is no binding sales agreement, fair value is estimated on the basis of market values, recent transactions, or the best available information that shows the proceeds that the company could reasonably expect to collect from the disposal of the asset. Value in use is the present value of the future cash flows expected to be derived from the use of the asset and, if significant and reasonably determinable, the cash flows deriving from its disposal at the end of its useful life, net of disposal costs. Cash flows are determined on the basis of reasonable and documented assumptions that represent the best estimate of the future economic conditions during the remaining useful life of the asset, giving more importance to independent assumptions. Oil, natural gas and petroleum products prices (and to prices for products which derive therefrom)there from) used to quantify the expected future cash flows are estimated based on forward prices prevailing in the marketplace for the first four years and management’s long-term planning assumptions thereafter. Discounting is carried out at a rate that reflects a current market valuation of the time value of money and of those specific risks of the asset that are not reflected in the estimate of the future cash flows. In particular, the discount rate used is the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) adjusted for the specific country risk of the activity.

The evaluation of the specific country risk to be includedconsidered for inclusion in the discount rate is determined on the basis of information provided by external parties. The WACC differs considering the risk associated with individual operating segments; in particular for the assets belonging to the Gas & Power and Engineering & Construction segments, taking into account the different riskrisks compared with Eni, specific WACC rates have been defined (for Gas & Power segment on the basis of a sample of companies operating in the same segment; for Engineering & Construction segment on the basis of the market quotation); WACC used for impairments in the Gas & Power segment is adjusted to take into consideration the risk premium of the specific country of the activity while WACC used for impairments in the Engineering & Construction segment is not adjusted for country risk as most of the company assets are not located in a specific country. For the regulated activities, the discount rate to useused for the measurement of the value in use is equal to the rate of return defined by the Regulator. For the other segments, a single WACC is used considering that the risk is the same to that of Eni as a whole. Value in use is calculated net of the tax effect as this method results in values similar to those resulting from discounting pre-tax cash flows at a pre-tax discount rate deriving, through an iteration process, from a post-tax valuation. Valuation is carried out for each single asset or, if the realizable value of a single asset cannot be determined, for the smallest identifiable group of assets that generates independent cash inflows from their continuous use, the so-called "cash generating unit". When the reasons for their impairment cease to exist, Eni makes a reversal that is recognized in the profit or loss account as income from asset revaluation. This reversed amount cannot exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation, had no impairment loss been recognized for the asset in prior years.

Intangible assets
Intangible assets are assets without physical substance, controlled by the company and able to produce future economic benefits, and goodwill acquired in business combinations. An asset is classified as intangible when management is able to distinguish it clearly from goodwill. This condition is normally met when: (i) the intangible asset arises from contractual or legal rights, or (ii) the asset is separable, i.e. can be sold, transferred, licensed, rented or exchanged, either individually or as an integral part of other assets. An entity controls an asset if it has the power to obtain the future economic benefits generated by the underlying asset and to restrict the access of others to those cash flows.

Intangible assets are initially stated at cost as determined by the criteria used for tangible assets and they are not revalued for financial reporting purposes.

Intangible assets with a definite useful life are amortized systematically over their useful life estimated as the period over which the assets will be used by the company; the amount to be amortized and the recoverability of the

F-15


carrying amount are verified in accordance with the criteria described in the section "Property, plant and equipment".

Goodwill and other intangible assets with an indefinite useful life are not amortized. The recoverability of their carrying value is reviewed at least annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Goodwill is tested for impairment at the level of the smallest aggregate on which the company, directly or indirectly, evaluates the return on the capital expenditure to which goodwill relates. When the carrying amount of the cash generating unit, including goodwill allocated thereto, exceeds the cash generating unit’s recoverable amount, the excess is recognized as impairment. The impairment loss is first allocated to reduce the carrying amount of goodwill; any remaining excess to be allocated to the assets of the unit is applied

F-13


pro-rata on the basis of the carrying amount of each asset in the unit. Impairment charges against goodwill are not reversed65. Negative goodwill is recognized in the profit and loss account.

Costs of technological development activities are capitalized when: (i) the cost attributable to the development activity can be reasonably determined; (ii) there is the intention, availability of funding and technical capacity to make the asset available for use or sale; and (iii) it can be demonstrated that the asset is able to generate future economic benefits.

Intangible assets also include public to private service concession arrangements in which: (i) the grantor controls or regulates what services the operator must provide with the infrastructure, to whom it must provide them and at what price; and (ii) the grantor controls – through ownership, beneficial entitlement or otherwise – any significant residual interest in the infrastructure at the end of the term of the arrangement.

According to the terms of the agreements the operator has the right to operate the infrastructure, controlled by the grantor, in order to provide the public service7 86.

Exploration and production activities97

Acquisition of mineral rights
Costs associated with the acquisition of mineral rights are capitalized in connection with the assets acquired (such as exploratory potential, probable and possible reserves and proved reserves). When the acquisition is related to a set of exploratory potential and reserves, the cost is allocated to the different assets acquired on the basis of the value of the relevant discounted cash flows.

ExpenditureExpenditures for the exploratory potential, represented by the costs for the acquisition of the exploration permits and for the extension of existing permits, is recognized under "Intangible assets" and is amortized on a straight-line basis over the period of the exploration as contractually established. If the exploration is abandoned, the residual expenditure is charged to the profit and loss account.

Acquisition costs for proved reserves and for possible and probable reserves are recognized in the balance sheet as assets.

Costs associated with proved reserves are amortized on a UOP basis, as detailed in the section "Development", considering both developed and undeveloped reserves. Expenditures associated with possible and probable reserves are not amortized until classified as proved reserves; in case of a negative result, the costs are charged to the profit and loss account.

Exploration
Costs associated with exploratory activities for oil and gas producing properties incurred both before and after the acquisition of mineral rights (such as acquisition of seismic data from third parties, test wells and geophysical surveys) are initially capitalized in order to reflect their nature as an investment and subsequently amortized in full when incurred.

Development
Development costs are those costs incurred to obtain access to proved reserves and to provide facilities for extracting, gathering and storing oil and gas. They are then capitalized within property, plant and equipment and


(5)Impairment charges recognized in an interim period are not reversed also when, considering conditions existing in a subsequent interim period, they would have been recognized in a smaller amount or would not have been recognized.
(6)When the operator has a unconditional contractual right to receive cash or another financial asset from or at the direction of the grantor, considerations received or receivable by the operator for construction or upgrade of the infrastructure are recognized as a financial asset.
(7)IFRSs have not specificcriteria for hydrocarbon exploration and production activities. Eni continues to use existing accounting policies for exploration and evaluation of assets previously applied before the introduction of IFRS 6 "Exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources".

F-16


amortized generally on a UOP basis, as their useful life is closely related to the availability of feasible reserves. This method provides for residual costs at the end of each quarter to be amortized at a rate representing the ratio between the volumes extracted during the quarter and the proved developed reserves existing at the end of the quarter, increased by the volumes extracted during the quarter. This method is applied with reference to the smallest aggregate representing a direct correlation between investments and proved developed reserves.

Costs related to unsuccessful development wells or damaged wells are expensed immediately as losses on disposal. Impairments and reversal of impairments of development costs are made on the same basis as those for tangible assets.


(6)Impairment charges recognized in an interim period are not reversed also when, considering conditions existing in a subsequent interim period, they would have been recognized in a smaller amount or would not have been recognized.
(7)When the operator has a unconditional contractual right to riceive cash or another financial asset from or at the direction of the grantor, considerations received or receivable by the operator for construction or upgrade of the infrastructure are recognized as a financial asset.
(8)The accounting policy for service concession arrangement has been defined according to IFRIC 12 "Service concession arrangements" (IFRIC 12); the application of IFRIC 12 has determined for 2007 the reclassification of euro 3,218 million from the line item "Property, plant and equipment" to "Intangible assets"; the effects on profit and loss accounts are not material.
(9)IFRS do not establish specific criteria for hydrocarbon exploration and production activities. Eni continues to use existing accounting policies for exploration and evaluation assets previously applied before the introduction of IFRS 6 "Exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources".

F-14


Production
Production costs are those costs incurred to operate and maintain wells and field equipment and are expensed as incurred.

Production-sharing agreements and buy-back contracts
Oil and gas reserves related to production-sharing agreements and buy-back contracts are determined on the basis of contractual clauses related to the repayment of costs incurred for the exploration, development and production activities executed through the use of the company’s technologies and financing (cost oil) and the company’s share of production volumes not destined to cost recovery (profit oil). Revenues from the sale of the production entitlements against both cost oil and profit oil are accounted for on an accrual basis whilstwhile exploration, development and production costs are accounted for according to the policies mentioned above.

The company’s share of production volumes and reserves representing the profit oil includes the share of hydrocarbons which corresponds to the taxes to be paid, according to the contractual agreement, by the national government on the behalf of the company. As a consequence the company has to recognize at the same time an increase in the taxable profit, through the increase of the revenues, and a tax expense.

Retirement
Costs expected to be incurred with respect to the retirement of a well, including costs associated with removal of production facilities, dismantlement and site restoration, are capitalized and amortized on a UOP basis, consistent with the policy described under "Property, plant and equipment".

Grants
Grants related to assets are recorded as a reduction of purchase price or production cost of the related assets when there is reasonable assurance that all the required conditions attached to them, agreed upon with government entities, have been met. Grants not related to capital expenditure are recognized in the profit and loss account.

Financial fixed assets

Investments
Investments in subsidiaries excluded from consolidation, jointly controlled entities and associates are accounted for using the equity method108. When there is objective evidence of impairment (see also section "Current assets"), the recoverability is tested by comparing the carrying amount and the related recoverable amount determined by adopting the criteria indicated in the section "Property, plant and equipment".

Subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates excluded from consolidation are accounted for at cost, adjusted for impairment losses if this does not result in a misrepresentation of the company’s financial condition. When the reasons for their impairment cease to exist, investments accounted for at cost are re-valued within the limit of the impairment made and their effects are included in "Other income (expense) from investments".

Other investments included in non currentnon-current assets are recognized at their fair value and their effects are included in shareholders’the equity under "Other reserves"; this reserve isrelated to other comprehensive income; the changes in fair value recognized in equity are charged to the profit and loss account when it is impaired or realized. When investments are not traded in a public market and fair value cannot be reasonably determined, investments are accounted for at cost, adjusted for impairment losses; impairment losses may not be reversed11.

The risk deriving from losses exceeding shareholders’ equity is recognized in a specific provision to the extent the parent company is required to fulfill legal or implicit obligations towards the subsidiary or to cover its losses.

Receivables and financial assets to be held to maturity
Receivables and financial assets to be held to maturity are stated at cost represented by the fair value of the initial exchanged amount adjusted to take into account direct external costs related to the transaction (e.g. fees of agents or consultants, etc.). The initial carrying value is then adjusted to take into account capital repayments, devaluations and amortization of the difference between the reimbursement value and the initial carrying value. Amortization is carried out on the basis of the effective internal rate of return represented by the rate that equalizes, at the moment of the initial revaluation, the current value of expected cash flows to the initial carrying value (so-called amortized cost method). Any impairment is recognized by comparing the carrying value with the present value of the expected cash flows discounted at the effective interest rate defined at the initial recognition, or at the


(10)(8)  In the case of step acquisition of a significant influence (or joint control), the investment is recognized at the acquisition date of significant influence (joint control) at the amount deriving from the use of the equity method assuming the adoption of this method since initial acquisition; the "step-up" of the carrying amount of interests owned before the acquisition of significant influence (joint control) is taken to equity.
(11)Impairment charges recognised in an interim period are not reversed also when, considering conditions existing in a subsequent interim period, they would have been recognized in a smaller amount or would not have been recognized.

F-15F-17


market and fair value cannot be reasonably determined, investments are accounted for at cost, adjusted for impairment losses; impairment losses may not be reversed9.

The risk deriving from losses exceeding shareholders’ equity is recognized in a specific provision to the extent the parent company is required to fulfill legal or implicit obligations towards the subsidiary or to cover its losses.

Receivables and financial assets to be held to maturity
Receivables and financial assets to be held to maturity are stated at cost represented by the fair value of the initial exchanged amount adjusted to take into account direct external costs related to the transaction (e.g. fees of agents or consultants, etc.). The initial carrying value is then adjusted to take into account capital repayments, impairment and amortization of the difference between the reimbursement value and the initial carrying value. Amortization is carried out on the basis of the effective interest rate of return represented by the rate that equalizes, at the moment of the initial revaluation, the current value of expected cash flows to the initial carrying value (so-called "amortized cost method"). Receivables for finance leases are recognized at an amount equal to the present value of the lease payments and the purchase option price or any residual value; the amount is discounted at the interest rate implicit in the lease.

Any impairment is recognized by comparing the carrying value with the present value of the expected cash flows discounted at the effective interest rate as defined at initial recognition, or at the moment of its updating to reflect re-pricings contractually established. Receivables and financial assets to be held to maturity are recognized net of the allowance for impairment losses; when the impairment loss is definite the excess allowance for impairment losses is reversed.reversed for charges otherwise for excess. Changes to the carrying amount of receivables or financial assets in accordance with the amortized cost method are recognized as "Financial income (expense)".

Non-current assets held for sale
Non-current assets and current and non-current assets included within disposal groups, whose carrying amount will be recovered principally through a sale transaction rather than through their continuing use, are classified as held for sale.

Non-current assets held for sale, current and non-current assets included within disposal groups that have been classified as held for sale and the liabilities directly associated with them are recognized in the balance sheet separately from the entity’s other assets and liabilities.

Non-current assets held for sale are not depreciated and they are measured at the lower of the fair value less costs to sell or their carrying amount.

Any difference between the carrying amount and the fair value less costs to sell is taken to the profit or loss account as an impairment loss; any subsequent reversal is recognized up to the cumulative impairment losses, including those recognized prior to qualification of the asset as held for sale.

Financial liabilities
Debt is carried at amortized cost (see item "Financial fixed assets" above).

Provisions for contingencies
Provisions for contingencies are liabilities for risks and charges of a definite nature and whose existence is certain or probable but for which at year-end the timing or amount of future expenditure is uncertain. Provisions are recognized when: (i) there is a current obligation (legal or constructive), as a result of a past event; (ii) it is probable that the settlement of that obligation will result in an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits; and (iii) the amount of the obligation can be reliably estimated. The amount recognized as a provision is the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the present obligation at the balance sheet date or to transfer it to third parties at that time. The amount recognized for onerous contracts is the lower of the cost necessary to fulfill the obligations, net of expected economic benefits deriving from the contracts, and any indemnity or penalty arising from failure to fulfill these obligations. If the effect of the time value is material, and the payment date of the obligations can be reasonably estimated, provisions to be accrued are the present value of the expenditures expected to be required to settle the obligation at a discount rate that reflects the company’s average borrowing rate taking


(9)Impairment charges recognized in an interim period are not reversed also when, considering conditions existing in a subsequent interim period, they would have been recognized in a smaller amount or would not have been recognized.

F-18


into account the risks associated with the obligation. The increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognized as "Financial income (expense)".

When the liability regards a tangible asset (e.g. site restoration and abandonment), the provision is statedrecorded with a corresponding entry to the asset to which it refers; chargesrefers. Charges to the profit and loss account charge are made withthrough the amortization process.process of the asset.

Costs that the company expects to bear in order to carry out restructuring plans are recognized when the company formally defines the plan and the interested parties have developed the reasonable expectation that the restructuring will happen.

Provisions are periodically updated to show the variations of estimates of costs, production times and actuarial rates; therates. The estimated revisions to the provisions are recognized in the same profit and loss account item that had previously held the provision, or, when the liability regards tangible assets (i.e. site restoration and abandonment) with a corresponding entry to the assets to which they refer.

In the notes to the consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements the following potential liabilities are described: (i) possible, but not probable obligations deriving from past events, whose existence will be confirmed only when one or more future events beyond the company’s control occur; and (ii) current obligations deriving from past events whose amount cannot be reasonably estimated or whose fulfillment will probably not result in an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits.

Employee benefits
Post-employment benefit plans, including constructive obligations, are classified as either defined contribution plans or defined benefit plans depending on the economic substance of the plan as derived from its principal terms and conditions. In the first case, the company’s obligation, which consists of making payments to the State or a trust or a fund, is determined on the basis of contributions due.

The liabilities related to defined benefit plans, net of any plan assets, are determined on the basis of actuarial assumptions and charged on an accrual basis during the employment period required to obtain the benefits.

The actuarial gains and losses of defined benefit plans are recognized pro-rata on service, in the profit and loss account using the corridor method, if and to the extent that net cumulative unrecognized actuarial gains and losses unrecognized at the end of the previous reporting period exceed the greater ofor 10% of the present value of the defined benefit obligation andor 10% of the fair value of the plan assets, over the expected average remaining working lives of the employees participating toin the plan.

Such actuarial gains and losses derive from changes in the actuarial assumptions used or from a change in the conditions of the plan.

F-16


Obligations for long-term benefits are determined by adopting actuarial assumptions; theassumptions. The effect of changes in actuarial assumptions or a change in the characteristics of the benefit are taken to the profit or loss in their entirety.

Treasury shares
Treasury shares are recorded at cost and as a reduction of equity. Gains resulting from subsequent sales are recorded in equity.

Revenues and costs
Revenues associated with sales of products and services are recorded when significant risks and rewards of ownership pass to the customer or when the transaction can be considered settled and associated revenue can be reliably measured. In particular, revenues are recognized for the sale of:

F-19


Revenues are recognized upon shipment when, at that date, significant risks are transferred to the buyer. Revenues from crude oil and natural gas production from properties in which Eni has an interest together with other producers are recognized on the basis of Eni’s net working interest in those properties (entitlement method). Differences between Eni’s net working interest volume and actual production volumes are recognized at current prices at year end.

Income related to partially rendered services is recognized inon the measurement of accrued income if the stage of completion can be reliably determined and there is no significant uncertainty as to the collectability of the amount and the related costs. When the outcome of the transaction cannot be estimated reliably, revenue is recognized only to the extent of the expenses recognized that are recoverable.

Revenues accrued induring the year related to construction contracts are recognized on the basis of contractual revenues with reference to the stage of completion of a contract measured on the cost-to-cost basis1210-11.

Requests offor additional revenues, deriving from a change in the scope of work, are included in the total amount of revenues when it is probable that the customer will approve the variation and the related amount; claimsamount. Claims deriving from additional costs incurred for reasons attributable to the client are included in the total amount of revenues when it is probable that the counterparty will accept them.

Revenues are stated net of returns, discounts, rebates, bonuses and direct taxation.

Award credits, related to customer loyalty programs, are recognized as a separate component of the sales transaction which grant the right to customers. Therefore, the portion of revenues related to the fair value of award credits granted is recognized as an offset to the item "Other liabilities". The liability is charged to the profit and loss account in the period in which the award credits are redeemed by customers or the related right is lost.

The exchange of goods and services of a similar nature and value do not give rise to revenues and costs as they do not represent sale transactions.

Costs are recorded when the related goods and services are sold, consumed or allocated, or when their future benefits cannot be determined.

Costs associated with emission quotas, determined on the basis of the average prices of the main European markets at period end, are reported in relation to the amount of the carbon dioxide emissions that exceed the amount assigned; related revenues are recognized upon sale.assigned. Costs related to the purchase of the emission rights are taken to intangible assets net of any negative difference between the amount of emissions and the quotas assigned. Revenues related to emission quotas are recognized when they are realized after the related sale. In case of sale, if applicable, the acquired emission rights should be considered as the first to be sold.

Operating lease payments are recognized in the profit and loss account over the length of the contract.

Labor costs include stock grants and stock options granted to managers, consistent with their actual remunerative nature. The instruments granted are recorded at fair value on the vesting date and are not subject to subsequent adjustments; the current portion is calculated pro-rata over the vesting period1312. Fair value of stock options is determined using valuation techniques which consider conditions related to the exercise of options, current share prices, expected volatility and the risk-free interest rate. The fair value of the stock grants and stock options is recorded as a charge to "Other reserves".

The costs for the acquisition of new knowledge or discoveries, the study of products or alternative processes, new techniques or models, the planning and construction of prototypes or, in any case, costs incurred for other scientific research activities or technological development, which cannot be capitalized, are included in the profit and loss account.

Exchange rate differences
Revenues and costs associated with transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are translated into the functional currency by applying the exchange rate at the date of the transaction.


(12)(10)  For service concession arrangements in which customers fees do not provide a distinction compensation for construction/update of the infrastructure and compensation for operating it and in the absence of external benchmarks which could be used to determine the respective fair value of these two items, revenues recognisedrecognized during the construction phase are limited to the amount of the costs incurred.
(13)(11)  For stock grants,When customers transfer an Item of property, plant and equipment different from an infrastructure used in a service concession arrangement (see Item "Intangible assets" above) or cash, which the entity must then use to connect customers to a network and/or to provide them with an ongoing access to a supply of goods or services, the related revenues are recognized immediately or on accrual basis considering the contractual services are rendered.
(12)The period between the date of the award and the date of assignation of stock; for stock options, the period between the date of the award and the date at whichstarting from the option can be exercised.

F-17F-20


The costs for the acquisition of new knowledge or discoveries, the study of products or alternative processes, new techniques or models, the planning and construction of prototypes or, in any case, costs borne for other scientific research activities or technological development, which cannot be capitalized, are included in the profit and loss account.

Exchange rate differences
Revenues and costs associated with transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are translated into the functional currency by applying the exchange rate at the date of the transaction.

Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency are converted by applying the year end exchange rate and the effect is stated in the profit and loss account. Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency valued at cost are translated at the initial exchange rate; non-monetaryrate. Non-monetary assets that are re-measured to fair value, recoverable amount or realizable value, are translated at the exchange rate applicable at the date of re-measurement.

Dividends
Dividends are recognized at the date of the general Shareholders’ Meetingshareholders’ meeting in which they were declared, except when the sale of shares before the ex-dividend date is certain.

Income taxes
Current income taxes are determined on the basis of estimated taxable income. The estimated liability is included in "Income taxtaxes payables". Current income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the amount expected to be paid to (recovered from) the tax authorities, using tax laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted atas of the balance sheet date and the tax rates estimated on an annual basis. Deferred tax assets or liabilities are provided on temporary differences arising between the carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities and their tax bases, based on tax rates (tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted for future years. Deferred tax assets are recognized when their realization is considered probable. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are included in non-current assets and liabilities and are offset at a single entity level if related to offsettable taxes. The balance of the offset, if positive, is recognized in the item "Deferred tax assets"; if negative, in the item "Deferred tax liabilities". When the results of transactions are recognized directly in shareholders’ equity, current taxes, deferred tax assets and liabilities are also charged to the shareholders’ equity.

Derivatives

Derivatives, including embedded derivatives which are separated from the host contract, are assets and liabilities recognized at their fair value which is estimated by using the criteria described in the section "Current assets". When there is objective evidence that an impairment loss has occurred (see "Current assets" paragraph) derivatives are recognized net of the allowance for impairment losses.

Derivatives are classified as hedging instruments when the relationship between the derivative and the subject of the hedgehedged item is formally documented and the effectiveness of the hedge is highhighly effective and is checked periodically.regularly reviewed. When hedging instruments cover the risk of variation of the fair value of the hedged item (fair value hedge, e.g. hedging of the variability ofon the fair value of fixed interest rate assets/liabilities) the derivatives are stated at fair value and the effects are charged to the profit and loss account. Hedged items are consistently adjusted to reflect the variability of fair value associated with the hedged risk. When derivatives hedge the cash flow variation risk of the hedged item (cash flow hedge, e.g. hedging the variability on the cash flows of assets/liabilities as a result of the fluctuations of exchange rate), changes in the fair value of the derivatives considered effective are initially stated in equity and then recognized in the profit and loss account consistent with the economic effects produced by the hedged transaction. The changes in the fair value of derivatives that do not meet the conditions required to qualify for hedge accounting are shownreported in the profit and loss account.

Economic effects of transactions, which relate to purchase or sales contracts for commodities entered into to meet the entity’s normal operating requirements and for which the settlement is provided with the delivery of the goods, are recognized on an accrual basis (the so-called normal sale and normal purchase exemption or own use exemption).

F-18F-21


Financial statements13
Assets and liabilities ofon the balance sheet are classified as current and non-current. Items ofon the profit and loss account are presented by nature14.

The statement of comprehensive income shows net profit integrated with income and expenses that are recognized directly in equity according to IFRS.

The statement of changes in shareholders’ equity includes profit and loss for the year, transactions with shareholders and other changes in shareholders’ equity.

The statement of cash flows is presented using the indirect method, whereby net profit is adjusted for the effects of non-cash transactions.

 

Changes in accounting principles

Starting from January 1, 2009, following the adoption of the provisions of IFRIC 13 "Customer Loyalty Programmes", award credits granted are recognized as a separate component of the sales transaction which granted the right to customers. As a result, part of the consideration received from the sale transaction is allocated to award credits granted, on the basis of their fair value, as an offset to the balance sheet item "Other liabilities"; such liability is recorded to the profit and loss account (as a revenue) in the year when award credits are redeemed by customers or rights are cancelled.

The application of IFRIC 13 determined the following adjustments in the 2007 and 2008 profit and loss account and in the balance sheet as of January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2008: (i) a decrease of euro 52 million and euro 66 million in "Net sales from operations" in the 2007 and 2008 profit and loss account, respectively; (ii) an increase of euro 6 million and euro 8 million in "Other income and revenues" in the 2007 and 2008 profit and loss account, respectively; (iii) a decrease of euro 46 million and euro 58 million in the line item "Purchases, services and other" in the 2007 and 2008 profit and loss account, respectively; (iv) the reclassification of euro 53 million and euro 66 million from "Provisions for contingencies" to "Other current liabilities" in the balance sheet as of January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

Segment reporting is prepared according to the provisions of IFRS 8 "Operating Segments", effective from January 1, 2009. The new standard requires segment reporting to be prepared according to the requirements used for the preparation of internal reports for the entity’s chief operating decision maker. Therefore the identification of operating segments and the related reporting are prepared on the basis of internal reports that are regularly reviewed by the entity’s chief operating decision maker in order to allocate resources to the segment and to assess its performance. The adoption of the provisions of IFRS 8 "Operating Segments" has not modified the reporting segments.

Starting from 2009, the provisions of the revised IAS 23 "Borrowing Costs" are effective. The revised standard requires the capitalization of borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset that takes a substantial period of time to get ready for use or sale. As a result, the main change from the previous version is the removal of the option of immediately recognizing as an expense such borrowing costs. The change does not affect Eni’s financial statements as it already capitalizes such costs.


(13)The financial statements are consistent with those reported in the Annual Report 2008 with the exception of: (i) the modifications related to the application, starting from 2009, of the revised IAS 1 "Presentation of Financial Statements" as integrated by the document "Improvements to IFRSs" issued in May 2008, which requires the preparation of the statement of comprehensive income and the recognition of non-hedging derivatives in the "current" and "non-current" section of the balance sheet. The classification of non-hedging derivatives determined the following effects: (a) the reclassification from current assets to non-current assets of euro 290 million and euro 480 million at January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2008, respectively; (b) the reclassification from current liabilities to non-current liabilities of euro 86 million and euro 564 million at January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2008, respectively; (ii) the recognition of the changes in the fair value of non-hedging derivatives on commodities, also including the effects of settlements, in the new profit and loss account item "Other operating income (expense)". Comparative period figures have been consistently restated; (iii) the final allocation of the acquisition costs of Distrigas NV, Eni Hewett Ltd, First Calgary Petroleums Ltd and Hindustan Oil Exploration Co Ltd related to business combinations occurred in 2008; carrying amounts of certain assets and liabilities acquired have been restated starting from the acquisition date. The final allocations are indicated in Note 27 – Other information.
(14)Further information on financial instruments as classified in accordance with IFRS is provided in Note 28 – Guarantees, commitments and risks – Other information about financial instruments.

F-22


Use of accounting estimates

The company’s Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with IFRS. These require the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses reported in the financial statements, as well as amounts included in the notes thereto, including discussion and disclosure of contingent liabilities. Estimates made are based on complex or subjective judgments and past experience of other assumptions deemed reasonable in consideration of the information available at the time. The accounting policies and areas that require the most significant judgments and estimates to be used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements are in relation to the accounting for oil and natural gas activities, specifically in the determination of proved and proved developed reserves, impairment of fixed assets, intangible assets and goodwill, asset retirement obligations, business combinations, pensions and other post-retirement benefits, recognition of environmental liabilities and recognition of revenues in the oilfield services construction and engineering businesses. Although the company uses its best estimates and judgments, actual results could differ from the estimates and assumptions used. A summary of significant estimates follows.

Oil and gas activities
Engineering estimates of the Company’s oil and gas reserves are inherently uncertain. Proved reserves are the estimated volumes of crude oil, natural gas and gas condensates, liquids and associated substances which geological and engineering data demonstrate that can be producedeconomically producible with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic conditions and operating conditions.methods. Although there are authoritative guidelines regarding the engineering criteria that must be met before estimated oil and gas reserves can be designated as "proved", the accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data and engineering and geological interpretation and judgment.

Field reserves will only be categorized as proved when all the criteria for attribution of proved status have been met. At this stage, all booked reserves will be classified as proved undeveloped. Volumes will subsequently be reclassified from proved undeveloped to proved developed as a consequence of development activity. The first proved developed bookings will occur at the point of first oil or gas production. Major development projects typically take one to four years from the time of initial booking to the start of production. Eni reassesses its estimate of proved reserves periodically. The estimated proved reserves of oil and natural gas may be subject to future revision and upward and downward revision may be made to the initial booking of reserves due to production, reservoir performance, commercial factors, acquisition and divestment activity and additional reservoir development activity. In particular, changes in oil and natural gas prices could impact the amount of Eni’s proved reserves asin regards to the initial estimate and, in the case of Production-sharing agreements and buy-back contracts, the share of production and reserves to which Eni is entitled. Accordingly, the estimated reserves could be materially different from the quantities of oil and natural gas that ultimately will be recovered.

Oil and natural gas reserves have a direct impact on certain amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Estimated proved reserves are used in determining depreciation and depletion expenses and impairment expense.

Depreciation rates on oil and gas assets using the UOP basis are determined from the ratio between the amount of hydrocarbons extracted in the quarter and proved developed reserves existing at the end of the quarter increased by the amounts extracted during the quarter.

Assuming all other variables are held constant, an increase in estimated proved developed reserves for each field decreases depreciation, depletion and amortization expense. Conversely, a decrease in estimated proved


(14)Further information on financial instruments as classified in accordance with IFRS is provided in Note 29 - Guarantees, commitments and risks "Other information about financial instruments".

F-19


developed reserves increases depreciation, depletion and amortization expense. In addition, estimated proved reserves are used to calculate future cash flows from oil and gas properties, which serve as an indicator in determining whether or not property impairment is to be carried out. The larger the volume of estimated reserves, the lower the likelihood of asset impairment.

Impairment of assets
Eni assesses its tangible assets and intangible assets, including goodwill, for possible impairment if there are events or changes in circumstances that indicate the carrying values of the assets are not recoverable.

Such indicators include changes in the Group’s business plans, changes in commodity prices leading to unprofitable performance, a reduced utilization of the plants and, for oil and gas properties, significant downward revisions of estimated proved reserve quantities or significant increase of the estimated development costs. Determination as to whether and how much an asset is impaired involves management estimates on highly uncertain

F-23


matters such as future commodity prices, the effects of inflation and technology improvements on operating expenses, production profiles and the outlook for global or regional market supply and demand conditions for crude oil, natural gas, commodity chemicals and refined products. Similar remarks are valid for the physical recoverability of assets recognized in the balance sheet (deferred cost - see also item "Current assets") related to natural gas volumes not collected under long term purchase contracts with take-or-pay clauses.

The amount of an impairment loss is determined by comparing the book value of an asset with its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the greater of fair value net of disposal costs andor the value in use. The estimated value in use is based on the present values of expected future cash flows net of disposal costs. The expected future cash flows used for impairment reviewsanalyses are based on judgmental assessments of future production volumes, prices and costs, considering available information at the date of review and are discounted by using a rate related to the activity involved.

For oil and natural gas properties, the expected future cash flows are estimated principally based on developed and non-developed proved reserves including, among other elements, production taxes and the costs to be incurred for the reserves yet to be developed. The estimated future level of production is based on assumptions concerning: future commodity prices, lifting and development costs, field decline rates, market demand and supply, economic regulatory climates and other factors.

Oil, natural gas and petroleum productsproduct prices used to quantify the expected future cash flows are estimated based on forward prices prevailing in the marketplace for the first four years and management’s long-term planning assumptions thereafter. The estimate of the future amount of production is based on assumptions related to the commodity future prices, lifting and development costs, market demand and to other factors. The discount rate reflects the current market valuation of the time value of money and of the specific risks of the asset not reflected in the estimate of the future cash flows.

Goodwill and other intangible assets with an indefinite useful life are not subject to amortization. The company tests such assets at the cash-generating unit level for impairment on an annual basis and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value below its carrying amount. In particular, goodwill impairment is based on the determination of the fair value of each cash-generating unit to which goodwill can be attributed on a reasonable and consistent basis. A cash generating unit is the smallest aggregate on which the company, directly or indirectly, evaluates the return on the capital expenditure. If the recoverable amount of a cash generating unit is lower than the carrying amount, goodwill attributed to that cash generating unit is impaired up to that difference; if the carrying amount of goodwill is less than the amount of impairment, assets of the cash generating unit are impaired on a pro-rata basis for the residual difference.

Asset retirement obligations
Obligations to remove tangible equipment and restore land or seabed require significant estimates in calculating the amount of the obligation and determining the amount required to be recorded presently in the consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements. Estimating future asset retirement obligations is complex. It requires management to make estimates and judgments with respect to removal obligations that will come to term many years into the future and contracts and regulations are often unclear as to what constitutes removal. In addition, the ultimate financial impact of environmental laws and regulations is not always clearly known as asset removal technologies and costs constantly evolve in the countries where Eni operates, as do political, environmental, safety and public expectations. The subjectivity of these estimates is also increased by the accounting method used that requires entities to record the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period when it is incurred (typically, at the time the asset is installed at the production location). When liabilities are initially recorded, the related fixed assets are increased by an equal corresponding amount. The liabilities are increased with the passage of time (i.e. interest

F-20


accretion) and any change in the estimates following the modification of future cash flows and discount rate adopted. The recognized asset retirement obligations are based on future retirement cost estimates and incorporate many assumptions such as: expected recoverable quantities of crude oil and natural gas, abandonment time, future inflation rates and the risk-free rate of interest adjusted for the Company’s credit costs.

Business combinations
Accounting for business combinations requires the allocation of the purchase price to the various assets and liabilities of the acquired business at their respective fair values. Any positive residual difference is recognized as "Goodwill". Negative residual differences are credited to the profit and loss account. Management uses all available information to make these fair value determinations and, for major business acquisitions, typically engages an independent appraisal firm to assist in the fair value determination of the acquired assets and liabilities.

F-24


Environmental liabilities
Together with other companies in the industries in which it operates, Eni is subject to numerous EU, national, regional and local environmental laws and regulations concerning its oil and gas operations, production and other activities. They include legislationlegislations that implement international conventions or protocols. Environmental costs are recognized when it becomes probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated.

Management, considering the actions already taken, insurance policies obtained to cover environmental risks and provision for risks accrued, does not expect any material adverse effect on Eni’s consolidated results of operations and financial position as a result of such laws and regulations. However, there can be no assurance that there will not be a material adverse impact on Eni’s consolidated results of operations and financial position due to: (i) the possibility of an unknown contamination; (ii) the results of the ongoing surveys and other possible effects of statements required by Decree No. 471/1999 of the Ministry of Environment concerning the remediation of contaminated sites; (iii) the possible effects of future environmental legislations and rules; (iv) the effects of possible technological changes relating to future remediation; and (v) the possibility of litigation and the difficulty of determining Eni’s liability, if any, as against other potentially responsible parties with respect to such litigations and the possible insurance recoveries.

(i)the possibility of an unknown contamination;
(ii)the results of the ongoing surveys and other possible effects of statements required by Decree No. 471/1999 of the Ministry of Environment concerning the remediation of contaminated sites;
(iii)the possible effects of future environmental legislations and rules;
(iv)the effects of possible technological changes relating to future remediation; and
(v)the possibility of litigation and the difficulty of determining Eni’s liability, if any, against other potentially responsible parties with respect to such litigations and the possible insurance recoveries.

Employee benefits
Defined benefit plans and other long-term benefits are evaluated with reference to uncertain events and based upon actuarial assumptions including among others discount rates, expected rates of return on plan assets, expected rates of salary increases, medical cost trends, estimated retirement dates and mortality rates. The significant assumptions used to account for pensions and other post-retirement benefits are determined as follows: (i) discount and inflation rates reflect the rates at which benefits could be effectively settled, taking into account the duration of the obligation. Indicators used in selecting the discount rate include rates of annuity contracts and rates of return on high quality fixed-income investments. The inflation rates reflect market conditions observed country by country; (ii) the future salary levels of the individual employees are determined including an estimate of future changes attributed to general price levels (consistent with inflation rate assumptions), productivity, seniority and promotion; (iii) healthcare cost trend assumptions reflect an estimate of the actual future changes in the cost of the healthcare related benefits provided to the plan participants and are based on past and current healthcare cost trends including healthcare inflation, changes in healthcare utilization and changes in health status of the participants; (iv) demographic assumptions such as mortality, disability and turnover reflect the best estimate of these future events for individual employees involved, based principally on available actuarial data; and (v) determination of the expected rates of return on assets is made through compound averaging. For each plan, the distribution of investments among bonds, equities and cash and their specific average expected rate of return is taken into account. Differences between expected and actual costs and between the expected return and the actual return on plan assets routinely occur and are called actuarial gains and losses. Eni applies the corridor method to amortize its actuarial losses and gains. This method amortizes on a pro-rata basis the net cumulative unrecognized actuarial gains and losses at the end of the previous reporting period that exceed 10% of the greater of: (i) the present value of the defined benefit obligation; and (ii) the fair value of plan assets, over the average expected remaining working lives of the employees participating in the plan.

Additionally, obligations for other long-term benefits are determined by adopting actuarial assumptions. The effect of changes in actuarial assumptions or a change in the characteristics of the benefit are taken to the profit or loss in their entirety.

F-21


Contingencies
In addition to accruing the estimated costs for environmental liabilities, asset retirement obligation and employee benefits, Eni accrues for all contingencies that are both probable and estimable. These other contingencies are primarily related to litigation and tax issues. Determining the appropriate amounts for accrualamount to accrue is a complex estimation process that includes subjective judgments.

Revenue recognition in the Engineering & Construction segment
Revenue recognition in the Engineering & Construction segment is based on the stage of completion of a contract as measured on the cost-to-cost basis applied to contractual revenues. Use of the stage of completion method requires estimates of future gross profit on a contract by contract basis. The future gross profit represents the profit remaining after deducting costs attributable to the contract from revenues provided for in the contract. The estimate of future gross profit is based on a complex estimation process that includes identification of risks related to

F-25


the geographical region, market conditions in that region and any assessment that is necessary to estimate with sufficient precision the total future costs as well as the expected timetable. Requests of additional income, deriving from a change in the scope of work, are included in the total amount of revenues when it is probable that the customer will approve the variation and the related amount. Claims deriving from additional costs incurred for reasons attributable to the client are included in the total amount of revenues when it is probable that the counterparty will accept them.

 

Recent accounting principles

Accounting standards and interpretations issued by IASB /IFRIC
IFRS 8 "Operating Segments" replaced IAS 14 "Segment Reporting". IFRS 8 sets out requirements for disclosure of information about the group segments that management uses to make decisions about operating matters. The identification of operating segments is based on internal reports that are regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker in order to allocate resources to the segments and assess their performances. IFRS 8 comes into effect starting on January 1, 2009.

The revised IAS 1 "Presentation of Financial Statements" requires, among other things, a statement of comprehensive income that begins with the amount of net profit for the year adjusted with all items of income and expenses directly recognized in equity, but excluded from net income, in accordance with IFRS. The revised standard comes into effect starting on January 1, 2009.

The revised IAS 23 "Borrowing Costs" requires the removal of the option of immediately recognizing as an expense borrowing costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset that take a substantial period of time to get ready for use or sale. The company is required to capitalize such borrowing costs as part of the cost of the asset. The revised standard comes into effect starting on January 1, 2009.

The revised IFRS 2 "Share-based payment" specifies the accounting treatment of all cancellations of a grant of equity instruments to employees. It also imposes that vesting conditions are only service and performance conditions required in return for the equity instruments issued. The revised standard comes into effect starting on January 1, 2009.

IFRIC 13 "Customer Loyalty Programmes" addresses how companies, which grant their customers loyalty, award credits when buying goods or services, should account for their obligation to provide free or discounted goods or services if and when the customers redeem the credits. In particular IFRIC 13 requires companies to allocate some of the consideration received from the sales transaction to the award credits and their recognition at fair value. This interpretation came into effect for annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2008 (for Eni: 2009 financial statements).

Amendments to IAS 1 "Presentation of Financial Statements" and to IAS 32 "Financial Instruments: Presentation" define the conditions that the puttable instruments issued by companies have to meet in order to be classified as equity. Moreover it allowed the classification as equity of instruments issued by the company that impose on the company an obligation to deliver to another party a pro rata share of the net assets of the entity only on liquidation. The amendments to IAS 1 and IAS 32 come into effect starting on January 1, 2009.

"Improvements to IFRSs", defined in the context of the annual process of "Improvements to IFRS" regards only changes to the existing standards with a technical and editorial nature. The provisions come into effect starting on January 1, 2009.

F-22


On January 10, 2008, IASB issued a revised IFRS 3 "Business Combinations" and an amended version of IAS 27 "Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements". The revisions to IFRS 3 require, among other things,interalia, (i) the acquisition-related costs to be accounted for separately from the business combination and then recognized as expenses rather than included in goodwill,expenses; (ii) the recognition into the income statementprofit and loss account of any change to contingent consideration,consideration; and (iii) the choice of the full goodwill method which means to treataccount for the full value of the goodwill of the business combination including the share attributable to minority interest.non-controlling interests. In the case of step acquisitions, the revisions also relate torequire the recognition in the profit and loss account of the difference between the fair value at the acquisition date of the net assets previously held and their carrying amounts.

The amendments of IAS 27 "Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements" require, among other things,interalia, that acquisitions or disposals of non-controllingownership interests in a subsidiary that do not result in the lossacquisition (loss) of control, shall be accounted for as equity transactions. By contrast, disposal of any interests that the parent retains in a former subsidiary, jointly controlled entity or associate may result in a loss of control.control, joint control and significant influence. In this case, at the date when control (joint control or significant influence) is lost, the remaining investment retained is increased/decreased torecognized at its fair value with gains or losses arising from the difference between the fair value and carrying amount of the held investment recognizedrecorded in the profit or loss account. The revised Standards shall be applied for annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2009 (for Eni: 2010 financial statements).

On July 3, 2008, IFRIC issued IFRIC 16 "HedgesAmendment to IAS 32 "Classification of rights issues" clarifies how to classify in the issuer’s financial statements those financial instruments which grant to shareholders the right to acquire equity instruments of the issuers for a Net Investmentprice denominated in a Foreign Operation" which definescurrency other than issuer’s functional currency. If such instruments are issued pro rata to the criteriaissuer's existing shareholders for recognition and evaluationa fixed amount of hedges of a net investmentcash, they should be classified as equity even if their exercise price is denominated in a foreign operation. In particularcurrency other than the interpretation defines, among other things, that the object of the hedge is the exchange differences between theissuer's functional currency of the foreign operation and the parent’s functional currency and that the hedge instrument can be held by any Group company with the exception of the hedged foreign operation. This interpretationcurrency. The amendment to IAS 32 shall be applied for annual periodsperiod beginning on or after OctoberFebruary 1, 20082010 (for Eni: 20092011 financial statements).

On November 27, 2008, IFRIC issued IFRIC 17 "Distributions of Non-cash Assets to Owner" which definesOwners" (hereinafter IFRIC 17) provides clarification and guidance on the criteriaaccounting treatment of recognition and evaluation of the distributions of non-cash assets other than cash when it pays dividends to its owner. It also applies in those situations in whichowners of an entity, gives its owneror distributions that give owners a choice of receiving either non-cash assets or a cash alternative. In particular, an entity shall measure a liability to distribute non-cash assets as dividends to its ownersthe interpretation requires, interalia, that the distribution is measured at the fair value of the assets to be distributed. The liability with anyto pay a dividend shall be recognized when the dividend is appropriately authorized; the liability and the related adjustments isare recognized as a contraan offset to equity. When thean entity settles the dividend payable, it shall recognize the difference, if any, between the carrying amount of the non-cash assets distributed and the fair value of the dividend payable is taken toin the profit or loss.loss account. This interpretation shall be applied for annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2009 (for Eni: 2010 financial statements).

On November 4, 2009, IASB issued a new version of IAS 24 "Related Party Disclosures", which: (i) enhances the definition of a related party requiring new cases; (ii) for transactions between entities related to the same Government, allows to limit quantitative disclosures to significant transactions. The revised standard shall be applied for annual periods beginning on or after January 29, 2008, IFRIC1, 2011.

On November 12, 2009 IASB issued IFRS 9 "Financial Instruments" which changes recognition and measurement of financial assets and their classification in the financial statements. In particular, new provisions require, inter alia, a classification and measurement model of financial assets based exclusively on the following categories: (i) financial assets measured at amortized cost; (ii) financial assets measured at fair value. New provisions also require that investments in equity instruments, other than subsidiaries, jointly controlled entities or associates, shall be measured at fair value with effects taken to the profit and loss account. If these investments are not held for trading purposes, subsequent changes in the fair value can be recognized in other comprehensive income, even if dividends are taken to the profit and loss account. Amounts taken to other comprehensive income shall not be subsequently transferred to the profit or loss account, even at disposal. IFRS 9 provisions shall be applied for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013.

F-26


On November 26, 2009 IASB issued IFRIC 18 "Transfers of Assets from customers"19 "Extinguishing Financial Liabilities with Equity Instruments" which defines the criteriaaccounting treatment to adopt when a financial liability is settled by issuing equity instruments to the creditor (debt for equity swaps). Equity instruments issued to extinguish a liability in full or in part are measured at their fair value or, if fair value cannot be reliably measured, at the fair value of recognitionthe financial liability extinguished. The difference between the carrying amount of the financial liability extinguished and evaluationthe fair value of transfers of items of property, plant and equipment by service providers that receive such transfers from their customers. The interpretation is also appliedequity instrument issued shall be recognized in the cases in which the entity receives cash from a customer that must be used only to connect the customer to a network. When the definition of an asset is met, the asset is recognized at its fair value. When the connection is realized, the entity shall recognize the revenue for a period generally determined by the terms of the arrangement with the customerprofit or if the arrangement does not specify a term, over a period corresponding to the lower of the length of the supply and the useful life of the asset used to provide the ongoing service. This interpretationloss account. IFRIC 19 provisions shall be applied for annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 20092010 (for Eni: 20102011 financial statements).

On April 16, 2009, IASB issued the document "Improvements to IFRSs" which includes only changes to the existing standards and interpretations with a technical and editorial nature. The provisions come into effect starting from 2010.

Eni is currently reviewing these new IFRS and interpretations to determine the likely impact on the Group’s results.

 

F-23

F-27


Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Current assets

1 Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents in the amount of euro 1,608 million (euro 1,939 million (euro 2,114 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) included financing receivables originally due within 90 days for euro 450 million (euro 616 million (euro 415 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008). The latter were related to amounts on deposit with financial institutions accessible only onwith a 48-hour notice.




2 Other financial assets held for trading or available for sale
Other financial assets held for trading or available for sale are set out below:

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
Investments 2,476 2,741
Securities held for operating purposes    
Listed Italian treasury bonds 229 257
Listed securities issued by Italian and foreign financial institutions 27 45
Non-quoted securities 3 8
  259 310
Securities held for non-operating purposes    
Listed Italian treasury bonds 168 109
Listed securities issued by Italian and foreign financial institutions 5 67
Non-quoted securities 1 9
  174 185
Total other securities 433 495
  2,909 3,236


Investments 2,741  
Securities held for operating purposes    
Listed Italian treasury bonds 257 113
Listed securities issued by Italian and foreign financial institutions 45 171
Non-quoted securities 8  
  310 284
Securities held for non-operating purposes    
Listed Italian treasury bonds 109 49
Listed securities issued by Italian and foreign financial institutions 67 14
Non-quoted securities 9 1
  185 64
Total securities 495 348
  3,236 348
  
 

Equity instruments of euro 2,741 million (U.S. $3,815 million at December 31, 2008 exchange rate) compriseddecreased by the carrying amount of athe 20% interest in OAO Gazprom Neft (euro 2,741 million), purchased by Gazprom following the exercise of a call option on April 7, 2009 on the basis of the existing agreements with Eni. On April 24, 2009, Eni received a payment of euro 3,070 million (U.S. $4,062 million at the exchange rate on the date of the transaction). Eni acquired the investment in Gazprom Neft on April 4, 2007 following finalization ofthrough a bid withinon the Yukos liquidation procedure. This entity is currently listed at the London Stock Exchange where approximately 5% of the share capital is traded, while Gazprom currently holds a 75% stake. This accounting classification reflectssecond lot of ex-Yukos assets. The strike price of the circumstance that Eni granted to Gazprom a call option on the entire 20% interestwas equal to be exercisable by Gazprom within 24 months from the acquisition date, at a price of U.S. $3.7 billion equaling the bid price adjusted(U.S.$3.7 billion) decreased by subtractingthe dividends distributed and adding possible share capital increases, aan increase of the contractual remuneration of 9.4% on the capital employed and related financing collateral expenses.

The existing shareholder agreements establish that the governance of the investee will be modified to allow Eni to exercise significant influence through participationOther securities in the financial and operating policy decisions of the investee in the case that Gazprom does not exercise its call option. The carrying amount of the interest equals the strike price of the call optioneuro 348 million (euro 495 million as of December 31, 2008. Eni decided not to adjust the carrying amount2008) were classified as available-for-sale securities. As of the interest to the market prices at the balance sheet date resulting in U.S. $1,961 million for the following reasons: (i) if Gazprom decides to exercise the call option, the strike price will be equal to the current carrying amount; (ii) if Gazprom decides not to exercise the call option, Eni will be granted significant influence in the decision-making process of the investee and consequently will be in a position to account for the investee in accordance with the equity method of accounting provided by IAS 28 for interests in associates. Under the equity method, Eni is required to allocate the purchase price to the corresponding interest in net equity and the residual amount to fair values of the investee’s assets and liabilities. Subsequently, the carrying amount is adjusted to reflect Eni’s share of losses and profits of the investee. Based on available information and the outcome of an impairment test performed also with the support of an independent consultant, the equity method assessment would result in an amount not lower than the current carrying amount of the interest.

Other securities of euro 495 million (euro 433 million at December 31, 2007) were available-for-sale securities. At December 31, 20072008 and December 31, 2008,2009, Eni did not own financial assets held for trading.

F-24


The effects of the valuation at fair value of securities are set out below:

(euro million) 

Value at
Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Changes recognized in the reserves of shareholders' equity

 

Value at
Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
 
Fair value 

2

 

3

 

5

  5 1 6 
Deferred tax liabilities   

(1

) 

(1

) (1)   (1)
Other reserves of shareholders’ equity 

2

 

2

 

4

 
Other reserves of shareholders' equity 4 1 5 
  
 
 

Securities held for operating purposes in the amount of euro 284 million (euro 310 million (euro 259 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) were designed to provide coverage of technical reserves offor the Group’s insurance company, Eni Insurance Ltd for euro(euro 302 million (euro 256 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008).

F-28


The fair value of securities was determined by reference to quoted market prices.





3 Trade and other receivables

Trade and other receivables were as follows:

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
Trade receivables 15,609 16,444
Financing receivables:    
- for operating purposes - short-term 357 402
- for operating purposes - current portion of long-term receivables 27 85
- for non-operating purposes 990 337
  1,374 824
Other receivables:    
- from disposals 125 149
- other 3,568 4,805
  3,693 4,954
  20,676 22,222


Trade receivables 16,444 14,916
Financing receivables:    
- for operating purposes - short-term 402 339
- for operating purposes - current portion of long-term receivables 85 113
- for non-operating purposes 337 73
  824 525
Other receivables:    
- from disposals 149 82
- other 4,805 4,825
  4,954 4,907
  22,222 20,348
  
 

Receivables are stated net of the allowance for impairment losses in the amount of euro 1,647 million (euro 1,251 million (euro 935 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008):

(euro million) 

Value at
Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Additions

 

Deductions

 

Other changes

 

Value at
Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
 
 
 
Trade receivables 

595

 

251

 

(36

) 

(63

) 

747

  747 260 (15) (50) 942
Financing receivables   

14

   

5

 

19

  19   (13)   6
Other receivables 

340

 

137

 

(26

) 

34

 

485

  485 206 (24) 32 699
 

935

 

402

 

(62

) 

(24

) 

1,251

  1,251 466 (52) (18) 1,647
  
 
 
 
 

The increaseTrade receivables decreased in trade receivablesthe amount of euro 8351,528 million was primarily relateddue to the Gas & Power segment (euro 1,9871,990 million), the Engineering & Construction segment (euro 513 million). These increases werewhich was partially offset by the decrease related toincrease in the Refining & Marketing segment (euro 1,036 million), Petrochemicals (euro 459 million) and Exploration & Production segment (euro 115380 million).

F-25


Trade and other receivables were as follows:

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 2008

Dec. 31, 2009

 
 

(euro million)

Trade receivables

Other receivables

Total

 

Trade receivables

 

Other receivables

 

Total

  
 
 



Neither impaired nor past due 

12,611

 

3,395

 

16,006

 12,611 3,395 16,006 11,557 3,004 14,561
Impaired (net of the valuation allowance) 

1,242

 

88

 

1,330

 1,242 88 1,330 1,037 58 1,095
Not impaired and past due in the following periods:                  
- within 90 days 

1,812

 

502

 

2,314

 1,812 502 2,314 1,168 772 1,940
- 3 to 6 months 

231

 

68

 

299

 231 68 299 503 56 559
- 6 to 12 months 

248

 

294

 

542

 248 294 542 294 439 733
- over 12 months 

300

 

607

 

907

 300 607 907 357 578 935
 

2,591

 

1,471

 

4,062

 2,591 1,471 4,062 2,322 1,845 4,167
 

16,444

 

4,954

 

21,398

 16,444 4,954 21,398 14,916 4,907 19,823
 


 
 
 

Trade receivables not impaired and past due primarily referred to high-credit-quality public administrations and other highly-reliable counterparties for oil, natural gas and chemical products supplies.

Allowances for impairment losses of traded receivables in the amount of euro 260 million (euro 251 million (euro 98 million in 2007)as of December 31, 2008) primarily referred to Refining & Marketing segment (euro 72 million),the Gas & Power segment (euro 65165 million), Petrochemicals (euro 60 million) and Syndial SpA (euro 27 million). In comparison with 2007 the amount of the allowance is more than double as a consequence of the larger number of clients in financial difficulties after the worsening of general economic conditions over the last part of the year.

F-29


Allowances for impairment losses of other receivables in the amount of euro 206 million (euro 137 million (euro 109 million in 2007)as of December 31, 2008) primarily referred to the Exploration & Production segment (euro 135205 million) duewhich primarily torepresents the impairment of certain receivables associated with cost recovery with respect to local state-owned co-venturers based on underlying petroleum agreements and modifications of the Company’s interest in certain joint ventures.

Trade receivables included guarantees for work in progress forin the amount of euro 168 million (euro 213 million (euro 156 million atas of December 2007)31, 2008).

Other receivables for euro 227 million associated with cost recovery in the Exploration & Production segment are currently undergoing arbitration procedure. No impairment loss has been recognized as the Company and the third party are in the process of defining a transaction on amicable terms.

Receivables for financing operating activities in the amount of euro 452 million (euro 487 million (euro 384 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) included euro 399245 million due from not consolidatedunconsolidated subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates (euro 246399 million atas of December 31, 2007) and2008), euro 47179 million cash deposit to provide coverage of Eni Insurance Ltd technical reserves (euro 11247 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) and receivables for financial leasing in the amount of euro 19 million (the same amount as of December 31, 2008). More information about receivables for financial leasing is included in Note 12 – Other Financial assets.

Receivables for financing non-operating activities amounted to euro 73 million (euro 337 million (euro 990 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008), of which euro 17367 million related to deposits for the current portion of a restricted deposit held by Eni Lasmo Plc as a guarantee of a debenture and euro 88 million related to deposit of Eni Insurance Ltd.Engineering & Construction segment. The decrease of euro 653264 million related for euro 898 millionis mainly due to the dischargerelease of a collateral cash deposit made byof Eni SpALasmo Plc made to guarantee certain cash flow hedging derivatives.a debenture (euro 173 million) and the decrease of deposits of Eni Insurance Ltd (euro 88 million).

Other receivables were as follows:

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
Accounts receivable from:    
- joint venture operators in exploration and production 1,699 2,242
- Italian government entities 386 378
- insurance companies 253 146
  2,338 2,766
Prepayments for services 194 857
Receivables relating to factoring operations 182 171
Other receivables 979 1,160
  3,693 4,954


F-26


Accounts receivable from:    
- joint venture operators in exploration and production 2,242 2,372
- Italian government entities 378 457
- insurance companies 146 194
  2,766 3,023
Prepayments for services 857 860
Receivables relating to factoring operations 171 156
Other receivables 1,160 868
  4,954 4,907
  
 

Receivables deriving from factoring operations in the amount of euro 156 million (euro 171 million (euro 182 million atas of December 31, 2007) were2008) related to Serfactoring SpA and consisted primarily of advances for factoring operations with recourse and receivables for factoring operations without recourse.

Other receivables in the amount of euro 461 million (euro 227 million as of December 31, 2008) associated with cost recovery in the Exploration & Production segment are currently undergoing arbitration procedures.

Receivables with related parties are described in Note 37 -36 – Transactions with related parties.

Because of the short-term maturity of trade receivables, the fair value approximatedapproximates their carrying amount.


F-30


4 Inventories
Inventories were as follows:

  

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 

(euro million)

 

Crude oil, gas and petroleum products

 

Chemical products

 

Work in progress

 

Other

 

Total

 

Crude oil, gas and petroleum products

 

Chemical products

 

Work in progress

 

Other

 

Total

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Raw and auxiliary materials and consumables 

861

 

299

   

809

 

1,969

 

466

 

263

   

1,155

 

1,884

 466 263   1,155 1,884 616 150   1,363 2,129
Products being processed and semi finished products 

74

 

27

   

15

 

116

 

48

 

17

   

3

 

68

 48 17   3 68 74 17   9 100
Work in progress     

553

   

553

     

953

   

953

     953   953     759   759
Finished products and goods 

1,962

 

703

   

17

 

2,682

 

2,528

 

557

   

92

 

3,177

 2,528 557   92 3,177 1,889 552   66 2,507
Advances     

179

   

179

          
 

2,897

 

1,029

 

732

 

841

 

5,499

 

3,042

 

837

 

953

 

1,250

 

6,082

 3,042 837 953 1,250 6,082 2,579 719 759 1,438 5,495
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Inventories increased by euro 583 million primarily due to: (i) an increase in the trade value of the inventories in the Gas & Power segment reflecting favorable trends in the gas price formulas (euro 661 million); and (ii) inclusion in consolidation of Distrigas NV (euro 322 million). Those increases were partially offset by a decrease of euro 718 million in the trade value of crude oil and petroleum products inventories in the Refining & Marketing segment primarily due to the impact of falling oil and petroleum product prices resulting in the recognition of a provision to write inventories down to their net realizable value at the year end.

Contract work in progress forin the amount of euro 759 million (euro 953 million (euro 553 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) are net of prepayments forin the amount of euro 13 million (euro 274 million (euro 577 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) which are within the limits of contractual considerations.

Inventories are stated net of the valuation allowance in the amount of euro 103 million (euro 697 million (euro 75 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008):

(euro million) 

Value at
Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Additions

 

Deductions

 

Other changes

 

Value at
Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
 
 
 
 

75

697 

628

36
 

(5

550
) 

(1

80
) 

697103

  
 
 
 
 

The additionsDeductions in the amount of euro 628550 million (euro 9 million in 2007) primarily related toessentially represent the Refining & Marketing segment (euro 402336 million) and to Petrochemicalsthe Petrochemical segments (euro 215200 million) as a consequence of the alignment of the inventories to their net realizable values at the closing date.

F-27


.


5 Current tax assets

Current tax assets were as follows:

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
Italian subsidiaries 634 53
Foreign subsidiaries 69 117
  703 170


Italian subsidiaries 53 570
Foreign subsidiaries 117 183
  170 753
  
 

The euro 533 million decreaseincrease in other current tax assets in the current incomeamount of euro 583 million mainly relates to receivables for interim tax assets primarily referred topayments which exceeded the full-year tax payable (euro 430 million) made by Eni SpA which has used the tax receivables to offset the tax payables for 2008 year (euro 554 million).SpA.


F-31


6 Other current tax assets

Other current tax assets were as follows:

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
VAT 376 623
Excise and customs duties 316 167
Other taxes and duties 141 340
  833 1,130


VAT 623 889
Excise and customs duties 167 119
Other taxes and duties 340 262
  1,130 1,270
  
 



7 Other current assets
Other current assets were as follows:

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
Fair value of non-hedging derivatives 629 1,608
Fair value of cash flow hedge derivatives 10 474
Other assets 441 267
  1,080 2,349


F-28


Fair value of non-hedging derivatives 1,128 698
Fair value of cash flow hedge derivatives 474 236
Other curren assets 268 373
  1,870 1,307
  
 

The fair value of derivative contracts which do not meet the criteria to be classified as hedges under IFRS was as follows:

  

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
(euro million)

  

Fair value

  

Purchase commitments

  

Sale
commitments

  

Fair value

  

Purchase commitments

  

Sale
commitments

  
 
 
 
 
 
Non-hedging derivatives on exchange rate                        
Interest currency swap 

170

 

821

 

291

 

141

 

403

 

200

Interest Currency Swap 35   80 2 113  
Currency swap 

69

 

1,596

 

2,881

 

202

 

2,654

 

1,712

 201 2,653 1,701 64 1,855 1,117
Other 

3

 

18

 

11

 

314

 

111

 

1,202

 285 98 1,154 142 174 537
 

242

 

2,435

 

3,183

 

657

 

3,168

 

3,114

 521 2,751 2,935 208 2,142 1,654
Non-hedging derivatives on interest rate                        
Interest rate swap 

91

 

248

 

3,466

 

29

 

217

 

703

 2   300 1 133  
Other         

4

     4   9 9  
 

91

 

248

 

3,466

 

29

 

221

 

703

 2 4 300 10 142  
Non-hedging derivatives on commodities                        
Over the counter 

12

 

75

 

22

 

864

 

1,270

 

2,709

 547 1,063 1,850 469 1,383 1,257
Other 

284

 

2

 

1,218

 

58

 

65

 

53

 58 65 53 11 234 8
 

296

 

77

 

1,240

 

922

 

1,335

 

2,762

 605 1,128 1,903 480 1,617 1,265
 

629

 

2,760

 

7,889

 

1,608

 

4,724

 

6,579

 1,128 3,883 5,138 698 3,901 2,919
  
 
 
 
 
 

Fair value of the derivative contracts is determined using market quotations provided by the primary info-provider,information providers, or in the absence of market information, appropriate valuation methods used in the marketplace.

Fair values of non-hedging derivatives in the amount of euro 698 million (euro 1,128 million as of December 31, 2008) consisted of derivative contracts that do not meet the formal criteria to be designated as hedges under IFRS because they were entered into in order to manage the net business exposures in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices. Therefore, such derivatives were not related to specific trade or financing transactions.

The increasedecrease in the fair value of the non-hedging derivatives in the amount of euro 979430 million primarily referred to the fair value of the derivatives deriving from the consolidation of Distrigas NV after the acquisition of control by the Gas & Power segment (euro 637315 million) and the Corporate and financial companies segment (euro 160 million).

F-32


Fair value of the cash flow hedgeshedge derivatives in the amount of euro 474236 million referred to Distrigas NV (euro 293 million) and to Exploration & Production segment (euro 181 million). The Distrigas NVNV. These derivatives were designated to hedge surpluses or deficits of gas to achieve a proper balance in the gas portfolio and sales/purchases of amounts of gas and oil products at fixed price. Fair value related to the Exploration & Production segment referred to theportfolio. The negative fair value of the future sale agreements of the proved oil reserves with a deadline by 2009. Those derivatives were entered into to hedge exposure to variability in future cash flows deriving from the sale in the 2008-2011 period of approximately 2% of Eni’s proved reserves as of December 31, 2006 corresponding to 125.7 mmBBL, decreasing to 79.7 mmBOE as of the end of December 2008 due to transactions settled in the year. These hedging transactions were undertaken in connection with acquisitions of oil and gas assets in the Gulf of Mexico and Congo that were executed in 2007.

Fair value offor contracts expiring by 2009in 2010 is given in Note 20 -19 – Other current liabilities; positive and negative fair value of contracts expiring beyond 20092010 is given in Note 15 -14 – Other non-current receivables and in Note 25 -24 – Other non-current liabilities. The effects of the evaluation at fair value of cash flow hedge derivatives are givenprovided in the Note 27 -26 – Shareholders’ equity and in the Note 32 - Finance income (expense).30 – Operating expenses.

The nominal value of cash flow hedge derivatives referred torepresented purchase and sale commitments forin the amount of euro 1,06925 million and euro 3,130 million. 603 million, respectively.

Information on the hedged risks and the hedging policies is givenprovided in Note 29 -28 – Guarantees, commitments and risks.

Other assets amounted to euro 267373 million (euro 441268 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) and included prepayments and accrued income for euro 104 million (euro 63 million (euro 297 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008), rentals for euro 35 million (euro 31 million (euro 21 million atas of December 31, 2007),2008) and insurance premiums for euro 18 million (euro 11 million (euro 10 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008).

F-29





Non-current assets

8 Property, plant and equipment
Analysis of tangible assets is set out below:

(euro million) Net value at the beginning of the year Investments Depreciation Impairments Change in the scope of consolidation Currency translation differences Other changes Net value at the end of the year Gross value at the end of the year Provisions for amortization and impairments
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dec. 31, 2007                     
Land 442 4     28   123 597 627 30 
Buildings 1,406 74 (98) (3) 115 (3) (152) 1,339 3,123 1,784 
Plant and machinery 32,494 1,774 (4,642) (37) 31 (1.530) 4.885 32,975 78,030 45,055 
Industrial and commercial equipment 230 163 (112)   40 (8) 38 351 1,434 1,083 
Other assets 328 86 (83) (3) 1 (11) 23 341 1,361 1,020 
Tangible assets in progress and advances 6,229 6,263   (97) 235 (648) (666) 11,316 11,969 653 
 41,129 8,364 (4,935) (140) 450 (2,200) 4,251 46,919 96,544 49,625 
Dec. 31, 2008                                          
Land 597 8     (7)   27 625 655 30  597 8     (7)   27 625 655 30 
Buildings 1,339 101 (105) (29) (122) 7 (341) 850 3,055 2,205  1,339 101 (105) (29) (122) 7 (341) 850 3,055 2,205 
Plant and machinery 32,975 3,486 (5,648) (652) 1.299 123 4,535 36,118 86,714 50,596  32,975 3,486 (5,648) (652) 1,301 123 4,535 36,120 86,716 50,596 
Industrial and commercial equipment 351 180 (158) (3)   1 230 601 1,722 1,121  351 180 (158) (3)   1 230 601 1,722 1,121 
Other assets 341 124 (83) (6) (13) 5 9 377 1,563 1,186  341 124 (83) (6) (13) 5 9 377 1,563 1,186 
Tangible assets in progress and advances 11,316 8,183   (653) 2.344 414 (4,342) 17,262 18,481 1,219  11,316 8,183   (653) 2,442 414 (4,342) 17,360 18,579 1,219 
 46,919 12,082 (5,994) (1,343) 3.501 550 118 55,833 112,190 56,357  46,919 12,082 (5,994) (1,343) 3,601 550 118 55,933 112,290 56,357 
Dec. 31, 2009                     
Land 625 10     2 (3) (16) 618 646 28 
Buildings 850 35 (99) (37) 25 (34) 45 785 3,057 2,272 
Plant and machinery 36,120 3,530 (6,277) (496) 3 (184) 7,162 39,858 96,280 56,422 
Industrial and commercial equipment 601 112 (152) (2) 16 (18) 230 787 1,948 1,161 
Other assets 377 152 (130) (4)   (8) 156 543 1,920 1,377 
Tangible assets in progress and advances 17,360 8,193   (451) 2 (281) (7,649) 17,174 18,715 1,541 
 55,933 12,032 (6,658) (990) 48 (528) (72) 59,765 122,566 62,801 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Capital expenditures in the amount of euro 12,032 million (euro 12,082 million (euro 8,364 million atfor the year ended December 31, 2007) primarily2008) essentially related to the Exploration & Production segment (euro 7,6118,196 million), the Gas & Power segment (euro 1,354 million), the Engineering & Construction segment (euro 2,0151,615 million), the Gas & Power segment (euro 1,318 million) and the Refining & Marketing segment (euro 941626 million). Capital expenditures included capitalized finance expenses of euro 221 million (euro 236 million (euro 180 million atfor the year ended December 31, 2007)2008) essentially related to the Exploration & Production segment (euro 10977 million), the Engineering & Construction segment (euro 76 million), the Refining & Marketing segment (euro 4435 million) and the Gas & Power segment (euro 4231 million). The interest rate used for the capitalization of finance expense ranged from 3.5%between 1.9% to 3.7% (3.5% and 5.1% (4.4% and 5.2% atfor the year ended December 31, 2007)2008).

F-33


The depreciation rates used were as follows:

(%)         
Buildings    

2

 

-

10

 
Plant and machinery    

2

 

-

10

 
Industrial and commercial equipment    

4

 

-

33

 
Other assets    

6

 

-

33

 

F-30


The break-down by segmentImpairments in the amount of impairments amounting to euro 990 million (euro 1,343 million (euro 140 atas of December 31, 2007)2008) and the associated tax effect by segment is provided below:

(euro million) 

2007

 

2008

  
 
Impairment    
Exploration & Production 86 765
Refining & Marketing 52 292
Petrochemicals   279
Other segments 2 7
  140 1,343
Fiscal effect    
Exploration & Production 30 213
Refining & Marketing 19 108
Petrochemicals   88
Other segments   2
  49 411
Impairment net of the relevant fiscal effect    
Exploration & Production 56 552
Refining & Marketing 33 184
Petrochemicals   191
Other segments 2 5
  91 932


(euro million) 

2008

 

2009

  
 
Impairment    
Exploration & Production 765 576
Refining & Marketing 292 287
Petrochemicals 279 121
Other segments 7 6
  1,343 990
Tax effect    
Exploration & Production 213 197
Refining & Marketing 108 108
Petrochemicals 88 33
Other segments 2 2
  411 340
Impairment net of the relevant tax effect    
Exploration & Production 552 379
Refining & Marketing 184 179
Petrochemicals 191 88
Other segments 5 4
  932 650
  
 

In assessing whether an impairment is required, the carrying value of thean asset is compared with its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of the asset’s fair value less costs to sell and value in use.or value-in-use. Given the nature of Eni’s activities, information on the fair value of an asset is usually difficult to obtain unless negotiations with potential purchasers are taking place. ConsequentlyEni assesses individual assets or groups of assets (Cash Generating Units - CGUs) which represent the lowest level at which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets. In particular, the CGUs consist of: (i) the Exploration & Production segment, which include individual oilfields or pools of oilfields whereby technical, economic or contractual features make the underlying cash flows interdependent; (ii) the Gas & Power segment, which include transport and distribution networks and related facilities, storage sites and re-gasification facilities in a consistent way with the gas segments of operations that are defined by the Italian Authority for Electricity and Gas for the purpose of tariff settings and other authorities. Other CGUs are gas carrier ships and plants for the production of electricity; (iii) the Refining & Marketing segment, which include refining plants and commercial facilities relating to each distribution channel and by country (ordinary network, high-ways network, and wholesale activity); (iv) the Petrochemicals segment, which include production plants and related facilities; and (v) the Engineering & Construction segment, which include Business Units Offshore construction, Onshore construction and Onshore drilling facilities and individual Rigs for Offshore operations.

The recoverable amount used in assessing the impairment charges described below is value in use. Value in usevalue-in-use. Value-in-use is calculated by discounting the estimated cash flows determined on the basis of the best information available at the moment of the assessment derivingwhich is derived from: (i) the Company’s four-year plan approved by the top management whichthat provides information on the expected oil and gas production, sales volumes, capital expenditures, operating costs and margins and industrial and marketing set-up, as well as trends inon the main monetary variables, including inflation, nominal interest rates and exchange rates. For the subsequent years beyond the four-year plan, horizon, a realnominal growth rate is used ranging from 0% to 2% has been used;; (ii) the commodity prices have been assessed based on the forward prices prevailing inon the market place as of the balance sheet date for the first four years of the cash flow projections and the long-term price assumptions adopted by the Company’s management for strategic planning purposes for the following years (see "Basis of presentation").

F-34


Post-tax cash flows are discounted at the rate which corresponds for the Exploration & Production, Refining & Marketing and Petrochemicals segments to the Company’s weighted average cost of capital, adjusted to consider the risks specific to each country of activity. Theactivity (adjusted post-tax WACCWACC). For 2009, the adjusted post-tax rates used for impairment purposes hastesting showed an increase of 0.5 percentage points on average from the previous year as a result of a higher market premium for the equity risk and the country risk. Such increase was partially reduced by decreased nominal interest rates reflected in the cost of borrowings and in rates of assets risk-free. For 2009, the adjusted post-tax rates ranged from 8.5%9% to 12.5%13.5%. Post-tax cash flows and discount rates have been adopted as they result in an assessment that is substantially equal to a pre-tax assessment.

In the Exploration & Production segment the main impairments were associatedrelated to proved and unproved oil & gas properties mainly located in Turkmenistan, Iran andthe Gulf of Mexico, Australia, Congo, Egypt and Nigeria as a consequenceresult of changes in the regulatorydownward reserve revisions and contractual framework, cost increases, as well as a changed pricing environment.increases.

In the Refining & Marketing segment the main impairments referred to: (i)related to refining plants due toplants. The drivers of those impairments were a worsening pricingweak refining environment and specific plantthe Company’s expectations for a slow recovery in those trends which negatively affected the refining performance in 2009, including compressed price differentials between heavy and light crudes, and weak prices for middle distillates that were dragged down by excess inventory. Also, plant-specific factors (low complexity and high fixed operating costs); and (ii) the motorway retail network of service stations due to a worsening pricing environment, lower forecast volumes, increased motorway royalties and the commitments with the grantor to execute certain capital expenditures that bear no return.were taken into account, particularly low complexity.

In the Petrochemicals segment the main impairments referred to: (i) aromaticrelated to the olefins-aromatic-polyethylene plants of the Sicilian industrial base and of Porto Marghera and the Sicilian pole. The main drivers of those impairments were continuing trends for margin pressures and volumes reduction, particularly in the case of commoditized products, due to lowerweak industry fundamentals in terms of sluggish demand, excess capacity and rising competitive pressures as new capacity is expected profitability associated with a worsening margin environment; (ii) styrene plants of Mantova due to the structural drop of the demand by the users of polystyrene; and (iii) polyethylene plants of the Sicilian industrial base due to the low competitiveness of the product, to the drop of the demand and the competitive pressure.

Changescome on line in the consolidation area of euro 3,501 million (euro 450 million at December 31, 2007) referred to the acquisition of control by the Exploration & Production segment of Burren Energy Plc (euro 2,543 million), FirstMiddle East.

F-31


Petroleums Ltd (euro 757 million), Hindustan Oil Exploration Co (euro 199 million) and Eni Hewett Ltd (euro 118 million), the acquisition of control by the Gas & Power segment of Distrigas NV (euro 30 million) and the sale by Refining & Marketing of Agip España SA (euro 146 million). More information on acquisitions is included in the Note 28 - Other information.

ForeignNegative foreign currency translation differences in the amount of euro 550528 million were primarily related to translation of entities accounts denominated in U.S. dollar (euro 1,3741,005 million). This effect was partially offset by translation of entities accounts denominated in Norwegian krones (euro 433 million) and British pounds (euro 308339 million).

Other negative changes in the net book value of tangible assets (euro 11872 million) referredrelate to the reclassification to assets classified as held for sale in the amount of euro 311 million and the disposals of assets in the amount of euro 150 million, which was offset by an increase in the initial recognition and change in theof estimated amount of the costs for the dismantling and restoration of sites referringin the amount of euro 289 million which mainly relate to the Exploration & Production segment (euro 620273 million). This effect was partially offset by asset disposals for euro 318 million,

The following is a description of which euro 248 million related to oilunproved mineral interests, included in tangible assets in progress and gas assetsadvances:

(euro million)

Value at the beginning of the year

Acquisitions

Impairments

Reclassification to Proved Mineral Interest

Other changes and currency translation differences

Net value at the end of the year







Dec. 31, 2008               
Congo 641 862 (10) (81) 85  1,497
USA 1,401   (144)    74  1,331
Turkmenistan   809 (164)    40  685
Algeria   748       (59) 689
Other countries 255 209 (90) (85) (1) 288
  2,297 2,628 (408) (166) 139  4,490
Dec. 31, 2009               
Congo 1,497 42    (333) (42) 1,164
USA 1,331 43 (231) (229) (32) 882
Turkmenistan 685      (13) (23) 649
Algeria 689      (220) (17) 452
Other countries 288 137 (54) (140)    231
  4,490 222 (285) (935) (114) 3,378






Unproved mineral interests are normally recognized upon allocation of the purchase price of business combinations in the Exploration & Production segment. The main amounts are associated with probable and possible reserves in Congo, Gulf of Mexico, Turkmenistan and Algeria associated with recent acquisitions. Changes during the year amounted to a decrease of euro 935 million which related to transfers to property, plant and equipment associated with recognition of proved reserves and internal approval for development. Impairments for

F-35


the year amounted to euro 285 million due to downward revisions related to properties in the Gulf of Mexico and, to a lesser extent, Nigeria.

The accumulated provisions for impairments amounted to euro 3,3284,692 million and euro 4,6925,680 million atas of December 31, 20072008 and 2008,2009, respectively.

AtAs of December 31, 2008,2009, Eni pledged property, plant and equipment for euro 2728 million primarily as collateral against certain borrowings (euro 5229 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008).

Government grants recorded as a decreasereduction of property, plant and equipment amounted to euro 642 million (euro 651 million (euro 682 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008).

Assets acquired under financial lease agreements amounted to euro 28 million (euro 163 million as of December 31, 2008), of which, euro 127 million related to a drilling platform by the Engineering & Construction segment, euro 2519 million related to FPSO ships used by the Exploration & Production segment to support oil production and treatment activities and euro 119 million related to service stations in the Refining & Marketing segment. The decrease of euro 135 million primarily related to the exercise of the option for the acquisition of a drilling platform by the Engineering & Construction segment for euro 127 million.

Contractual commitments related to the purchase of property, plant and equipment are included in Note 29 -28 – Guarantees, commitments and risks - Liquidity risk.

Property, plant and equipment under concession arrangements are described in Note 29 -28 – Guarantees, commitments and risks - Assets– Asset under concession arrangements.

F-32


Property, plant and equipment by segment

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
Property, plant and equipment, gross          
Exploration & Production 54,284 66,023  64,338 71,189 
Gas & Power 17,438 18,944  20,729 22,040 
Refining & Marketing 12,421 12,899  12,899 13,378 
Petrochemicals 4,918 5,036  5,036 5,174 
Engineering & Construction 5,823 7,702  7,702 9,163 
Other activities 1,543 1,550  1,550 1,592 
Corporate and financial companies 344 391  391 373 
Elimination of intra-group profits (227) (355) (355) (343)
 96,544 112,190  112,290 112,566 
Accumulated depreciation, amortization and impairment losses          
Exploration & Production 27,806 32,811  31,983 36,727 
Gas & Power 6,179 6,863  7,691 8,262 
Refining & Marketing 7,926 8,403  8,403 8,981 
Petrochemicals 3,819 4,124  4,124 4,321 
Engineering & Construction 2,310 2,548  2,548 2,858 
Other activities 1,461 1,467  1,467 1,513 
Corporate and financial companies 148 179  179 194 
Elimination of intra-group profits (24) (38) (38) (55)
 49,625 56,357  56,357 62,801 
Property, plant and equipment, net          
Exploration & Production 26,478 33,212  32,355 34,462 
Gas & Power 11,259 12,081  13,038 13,778 
Refining & Marketing 4,495 4,496  4,496 4,397 
Petrochemicals 1,099 912  912 853 
Engineering & Construction 3,513 5,154  5,154 6,305 
Other activities 82 83  83 79 
Corporate and financial companies 196 212  212 179 
Elimination of intra-group profits (203) (317) (317) (288)
 46,919 55,833  55,933 59,765 
  
 

F-36


9 Other assets
The carrying amount of the expropriated Dación assets (euro 563 million at December 31, 2007) have been reclassified in the item "Other non-current receivables" following the settlement agreement with the Republic of Venezuela. Under the terms of this agreement, Eni will receive cash compensation, a part of which has been already collected in the year, to be paid in seven yearly installments, yielding interest income from the date of the settlement. The net present value of this cash compensation is in line with the book value of assets, net of the related provisions.


10 Inventory - compulsory stock
Inventory - compulsory stock was as follows:

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
Crude oil and petroleum products 2,015 1,040
Natural gas 156 156
  2,171 1,196


F-33


Crude oil and petroleum products 1,040 1,586
Natural gas 156 150
  1,196 1,736
  
 

Compulsory stock was primarily held by Italian companies (euro 2,0081,184 million and euro 1,1841,724 million atas of December 31, 20072008 and 2008,2009, respectively) in accordance with minimum stock requirements set forth by applicable laws. The decrease of euro 975 million in crude oil and petroleum products is primarily due to the impairment for alignment of the inventories to the net realizable values recognized at year end (euro 724 million).




1110 Intangible assets

Intangible assets were as follows:

(euro million) 

Net value at the beginning of the year

 

Investments

 

Amortization

 

Changes in the scope of consolidation

 

Other changes

 

Net value at the end of the year

 

Gross value at the end of the year

 

Provisions for amortization
and writedowns

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dec. 31, 2007                 
Intangible assets with finite useful lives                 
Exploration expenditures 409 1,682 (1,812)   470 749 1,509 760 
Industrial patents and intellectualproperty rights 112 40 (81)   77 148 1,179 1,031 
Concessions, licenses, trademarksand similar items 856 12 (83) 1   786 2,449 1,663 
Service concession arrangements 3,183 168 (96)   (37) 3,218 5,699 2,481 
Intangible assets in progressand advances 151 312     (86) 377 381 4 
Other intangible assets 141 15 (24) 36 (10) 158 572 414 
 4,852 2,229 (2,096) 37 414 5,436 11,789 6,353 
Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives                 
Goodwill 2,084       31 2,115     
 6,936 2,229 (2,096) 37 445 7,551     
Dec. 31, 2008                                 
Intangible assets with finite useful lives                                 
Exploration expenditures 749 1,907 (2,097) 326 77 962 2,286 1,324  749 1,907 (2,097) 335 77 971 2,295 1,324
Industrial patents and intellectual property rights 148 44 (85)   42 149 1,203 1,054  148 44 (85)   42 149 1,203 1,054
Concessions, licenses, trademarks and similar items 786 17 (93) (15) 38 733 2,475 1,742  786 17 (93) (15) 38 733 2,475 1,742
Service concession arrangements 3,218 230 (109)   (17) 3,322 5,837 2,515  3,218 230 (109)   (17) 3,322 5,837 2,515
Intangible assets in progressand advances 377 264     (61) 580 590 10 
Intangible assets in progress and advances 377 264     (61) 580 590 10
Other intangible assets 158 18 (52) 1,600 14 1,738 2,000 262  158 18 (52) 1,595 14 1,733 1,995 262
 5,436 2,480 (2,436) 1,911 93 7,484 14,391 6,907  5,436 2,480 (2,436) 1,915 93 7,488 14,395 6,907
Intangible assetswith indefinite useful lives                 
Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives                
Goodwill 2,115     1,439 (1) 3,553      2,115     1,417 (1) 3,531    
 7,551 2,480 (2,436) 3,350 92 11,037      7,551 2,480 (2,436) 3,332 92 11,019    
Dec. 31, 2009                
Intangible assets with finite useful lives                
Exploration expenditures 971 1,273 (1,615)   2 631 2,259 1,628
Industrial patents and intellectual property rights 149 10 (85)   64 138 1,275 1,137
Concessions, licenses, trademarks and similar items 733 20 (153)   71 671 2,403 1,732
Service concession arrangements 3,322 268 (121)   (57) 3,412 5,958 2,546
Intangible assets in progress and advances 580 83     (82) 581 584 3
Other intangible assets 1,733 9 (136)   20 1,626 2,035 409
 7,488 1,663 (2,110)   18 7,059 14,514 7,455
Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives                
Goodwill 3,531     15 864 4,410    
 11,019 1,663 (2,110) 15 882 11,469    
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Exploration expenditures in the amount of euro 962631 million mainly related to license acquisition costs that are amortized on a straight-line basis over the contractual term of unproved reserves other than probablethe exploration lease or fully written off against profit and possible resources includedloss in business combinations and the purchasecase of mineral rights. Main additions inrelease or when no future activity is planned. Additions for the year included exploration drilling expenditures which were fully amortized as incurred forin the amount of euro 1,271 million (euro 1,715 million included within "investments" (euro 1,610 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008).

F-37


Concessions, licenses, trademarks and similar items forin the amount of euro 733671 million primarily comprised of transmission rights for natural gas imported from Algeria (euro 482452 million) and concessions for mineral exploration (euro 189157 million).

Service concession arrangements in the amount of euro 3,412 primarily refer to the Italian gas distribution activity (euro 3,1113,205 million and euro 3,2053,340 million atas of December 31, 20072008 and 2008,2009, respectively). Such activity is conducted on the basis of concessions granted by local public entities. At the expiryexpiration date of the concession, a compensation is paid, defined by using criteria of a business appraisal, to the outgoing operator following the sale of its own gas distribution network. Service tariffs for distribution are defined on the basis of a method established by the Authority for Electricity and Gas. Legislative Decree No. 164/2000 provides the grant of distribution service exclusively by tender, with a

F-34


maximum length of 12 years. Other negative changes in the net book value of intangible assets (euro 57 million) referred to the reclassification to assets classified as held for sale in the amount of euro 110 million. Government grants recorded as a decrease ofin service concession arrangements amounted to euro 693 million (euro 657 million (euro 513 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008).

Other intangible assets with finite useful lives in the amount of euro 1,7381,626 million primarily referred to: (i) customer relationship and order backlog forin the amount of euro 1,244 million (euro 1,355 million as of December 31, 2008) recognized after the acquisition of control ofon Distrigas NV. These assets are amortized on the basis of the supply contract with the longest term (19 years) and the residual useful life of the sale contract (4 years); (ii) the development project of the gas storage capacity recognized after the acquisition of control of Eni Hewett Ltd in the amount of euro 234 million (euro 208 million)million as of December 31, 2008); (iii) royalties for the use of licenses by Polimeri Europa SpA in the amount of euro 68 million (euro 72 million)million as of December 31, 2008); and (iv) estimated costs for Eni’s social responsibility projects in relation to oil development programs in Val d’Agri in the amount of euro 38 million (euro 18 million)million as of December 31, 2008) following commitments made with the Basilicata Region.

The depreciation rates used were as follows:

(%)  
Exploration expenditures    

10

 

-

33

     

14

 

-

33

 
Industrial patents and intellectual property rights    

20

 

-

33

     

20

 

-

33

 
Concessions, licenses, trademarks and similar items    

7

 

-

33

     

3

 

-

33

 
Service concession arrangements    

2

 

-

20

 
Concessions, licenses, trademarks and similar items    

2

 

-

20

 
Other intangible assets    

4

 

-

25

     

4

 

-

25

 

Changes in the consolidation area related to theOther changes of intangible assets with a finitedefinite useful lifelive in the amount of euro 1,91118 million primarily related to the acquisitioninclude negative currency translation differences of control by the Gas & Power segment on Distrigas NV for euro 1,395 million (customer relationship for euro 1,216 million, order backlog for euro 165 million and software for euro 14 million), unproved reserves other than probable and possible resources recognized after the acquisition of control by the Exploration & Production segment on Burren Energy Plc for euro 326 million and the development project of the gas storage capacity recognized after the acquisition of control of Eni Hewett Ltd (euro 208 million).22 million.

ChangeChanges in the scope of consolidation area related to the intangible assets with an indefinite useful lifelive (goodwill) in the amount of euro 1,43915 million primarilymainly refers to the acquisition of control by the Gas & Power segment on Distrigas NVSeacom SpA (euro 1,245 million), the acquisition of control by the Exploration & Production segment on Burren Energy Plc (euro 89 million), on First Calgary Petroleums Ltd (euro 88 million) and on Eni Hewett (euro 3913 million).

The carrying amount of goodwill at the endas of the yearDecember 31, 2009 was euro 3,5534,410 million (euro 2,1153,531 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008). The break-down by operating segment is as follows:

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
Exploration & Production 158 266 243 249
Gas & Power 1,125 2,399 2,400 3,328
Refining & Marketing 86 142 142 84
Engineering & Construction 746 746 746 749
 2,115 3,553 3,531 4,410
  
 

Goodwill acquired through business combinations has been allocated to the cash generating units ("CGUs") that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the acquisition. The recoverable amount of the CGUs is the higher of: (i) fair value less costs to sell if there is an active market or recent transactions for similar assets within the same industry between knowledgeable and willing parties; and (ii) value-in-use which is determined by discounting the estimated future cash flows determined on the basisbased of the best pieces of information available at the moment of the assessment derivingwhich is derived from: (a) the Company’s four-year plan approved by the top management whichthat provides information on the expected oil and gas production, sales volumes, capital expenditures, operating costs and margins and industrial and marketing set-up, as well as trends inon the main monetary variables, including inflation, nominal interest rates and exchange rates. For the subsequent years beyond the four-year plan, horizon, a realnominal growth rate is used ranging from 0%

F-38


to 2% has been used;; (b) the commodity prices have been assessed based on the forward prices prevailing inon the market place as of the balance sheet date for the first four years of the cash flow projections and the long-term price assumptions adopted by the Company’s top management for strategic planning purposes for the following years (see Basis"Basis of presentation)presentation").

Value-in-use is determined by discounting post-tax cash flows at the rate which corresponds:following rates: (i) forin the Exploration & Production and Refining & Marketing and Petrochemicals segments, atimpairment rates correspond to the Company’s weighted average cost of capital, (post-tax WACC),as adjusted to consider risks specific to each country of activity. WACCactivity (adjusted post-tax WACC). For 2009, the adjusted post-tax rates used for impairment testing showed an increase of 0.5 percentage points on average from the impairment purposes hasprevious year as a result of a higher market premium for the equity risk and the country risk. Such increases were partially reduced by decreased nominal interest rates reflected in the cost of borrowings and in rates of assets risk-free. For 2009, the adjusted post-tax rates ranged from 8.5%9% to 12.5%13.5%; (ii) for the Gas & Power and Engineering

F-35


& Construction segments, at their specific WACC.adjusted post-tax WACC have been used. For the Gas & Power segment it has been estimated on the basis of a sample of companies operating in the same segment, for the Engineering & Construction segment on the basis of market data. WACCRates used for impairments in the Gas & Power segment hashave been adjusted to take into consideration risks specific to each country of activity, while WACCrates used for impairments in the Engineering & Construction segment hashave not been adjusted as most of the company assets are not permanently located in a specific country. WACC used for impairment has ranged from 7.5% to 9%Rates for the Gas & Power segment and it washave ranged from 7% to 8%, representing a reduction of 0.5 percentage points on average from the previous year, which reflects decreased nominal interest rates, while the equity risk for utilities has remained unchanged. In the Engineering & Construction segment;segment, rates at 8.5% have increased on average by 0.5 percentage points due to higher equity risk; and (iii) for the regulated activities in the Italian natural gas sector, the discount rates have been assumed equal to the rates of return defined by the Italian Authority for Electricity and Gas.

Post-tax cash flows and discount rates have been adopted as they result in an assessment that is substantially equal to a pre-tax assessment.

Goodwill has been allocated to the following CGUs:

Gas & Power segment

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
Domestic gas market 743 743
Foreign gas market 67 1,341
- of which Distrigas NV   1,245
Domestic natural gas transportation network 305 305
Other 10 10
  1,125 2,399


Domestic gas market 743 766
Foreign gas market 1,342 2,247
- of which European market (Distrigas) 1,248 2,148
Domestic natural gas transportation network 305 305
Other 10 10
  2,400 3,328
  
 

Goodwill allocated to the CGU domestic gas market referred primarily related to goodwill recognized followingupon the purchasebuy-out of minorities in Italgas SpA in 2003 through a public offering (euro 706 million). The key assumptions adopted for assessing the recoverable amount of the CGU which exceeds its carrying amount referred toincluded commercial margins, forecast sales volumes, the discount rate and the growth rates adopted to determine the terminal value. Information on these drivers has been collected from the four-year-plan approved by the Company’s top management while thethat factored in revised downward prospects of gas demand growth in Italy. The terminal value has beenwas estimated throughbased on the perpetuity method of the last-year-plan.last-year-plan assuming a long-term nominal growth rate equal to zero. The excess of the recoverable amount of the domestic gas market CGU over its carrying amount including the allocated portion of goodwill (headroom) would be reduced to zero under each of the following hypothesis: (i) a decrease of 20%28.7% on average in the projected commercial margins in each of the four years of the plan;margins; (ii) a decrease of 20%28.7% on average in the expected volumes in each of the four years of the plan;projected sales volumes; (iii) an increase of 1.73.4 percentage points in the discount rate; and (iv) a negative realnominal growth rate of 2%4.4%. The recoverable amount of the CGU domestic gas market and the relevant sensitivity analysis were calculated solely on the basis of retail margins, thus excluding wholesale and business client margins (industrial, thermoelectric and others).

Goodwill allocated to the Distrigas CGU has beenrepresented by the European gas market was recognized following theupon acquisition of the Belgian company Distrigas NV that was acquired in two different steps: (i) a controlling interest of 57.24% in the Belgian companywas acquired in October 2008. The allocation is2008 and (ii) a mandatory tender offer was finalized on a preliminary basis. When the minorities of Distrigas and the subsequent squeeze-out at the same price allocation is finalized,of the acquisition of the controlling interest. Such goodwill is expected to behas been allocated to the different CGUsCGU that areis expected to benefit from the synergies of the acquisition. Atacquisition corresponding to the European market that time, it will be possibleincludes the activities of Distrigas and other European marketing activities conducted by the Gas

F-39


& Power Division of Eni SpA. Key assumptions adopted for assessing the recoverable amount of the European market CGU which exceeds its carrying amount included commercial margins, forecast sales volumes, the discount rate and the growth rates adopted to determine anythe terminal value. The determination of the value-in use is based on the four-year-plan approved by Eni’s top management which assumed full integration of the Distrigas activities with other European activities. The plan also factored in the revised downward prospects for gas demand growth in Europe and consistent projection on marketing margins. The terminal value was estimated based on the perpetuity method of the last-year-plan assuming a long-term nominal growth rate equal to 1.6%. The excess of the recoverable amount of the CGUsEuropean market CGU over theirits carrying amounts,amount including anythe allocated portion of goodwill and define the hypothesis under which the headroom(headroom) would be reduced to zero.zero under each of the following hypothesis: (i) a decrease of 40.9% on average in the projected marketing margins; (ii) a decrease of 40.9% on average in planned sales volumes; (iii) an increase of 3.9 percentage points in the discount rate; (iv) a negative nominal growth rate of 4.0%.

Goodwill allocated to the domestic natural gas transportation network CGU referred to the purchase of own shares by Snam Rete Gas SpA and it is equal to the difference between the purchase costprice over the carrying amount of the corresponding share of equity. The recoverable amount of the CGU is assessed based on its Regulatory Asset Base (RAB) as recognized by the Italian Authority for Electricity and Gas and it is higher than its carrying amount, including the allocated goodwill. Management believes that no reasonably possible change in the assumptions adopted would cause the headroom of the CGU to be reduced to zero.

F-36


Engineering & Construction
segment

(euro million)

Dec. 31, 2008

Dec. 31, 2009



Offshore constructions 416 416
Onshore constructions 314 317
Other 16 16
  746 749
  
 

The segmentEngineering & Construction segment’s goodwill in the amount of euro 746749 million was mainly recognized following the acquisition of Bouygues Offshore SA, now Saipem SA (euro 711 million) and was allocated to the following CGUs:.

(euro million)

Dec. 31, 2007

Dec. 31, 2008



Offshore constructions 416 416
Onshore constructions 315 314
Other 15 16
  746 746


The key assumptions adopted for assessing the recoverable amount of the CGUs which exceeds the carrying amount referred to operating results, the discount rate and the growth rates adopted to determine the terminal value. Information on these drivers has been collected from the four-year-plan approved by the Company’s top management while the terminal value has been estimated by using a perpetual nominal growth rate of 2% applied to an average normalized terminalthe cash flow.

flow of the four-year period. The following changes in each of the assumptions, all else being equal ceteris paribus would cause the headroom of the Offshore construction CGU to be reduced to zero: (i) decrease of 52%56% of the operating result of the four years of the plan; (ii) increase of 68 percentage points of the discount rate; and (iii) a negative real growth rate.

Changes in each of the assumptions, all else being equal ceteris paribus that would cause the headroom of the Onshore construction CGU to be reduced to zero are greater than those of the Offshore construction CGU described above. As well, also

The Exploration & Production and the Refining & Marketing segments tested their goodwill, yielding the following results: (i) in the Exploration & Production segment (euro 249 million of carrying amount), management believes that there are no reasonably possible changes in the pricing environment and production/cost profiles that would cause the headroom for the Offshore and Onshore CGUs calculated by removing the normalization of the terminal cash flows results widely positive.relevant CGUs to be reduced to zero. Goodwill mainly refers to the portion of the acquisition cost that was not allocated to proved or unproved mineral interests from the business combinations of Lasmo, Burren Energy (Congo) and First Calgary. The change in goodwill recorded by the segment in the period derived from the completion of the purchase price allocation of First Calgary in the amount of euro 65 million; (ii) in the Refining & Marketing segment (euro 84 million), the Company recorded an impairment charge in the amount of euro 58 million, of which euro 48 million related to goodwill allocated to the fuel retail business assets and aviation fuel supply business recently acquired in Central-Eastern Europe driven by lower expectations for margins/volumes due to decreased fuel demand caused by the economic downturn and loss of market share and an impairment charge in the amount of euro 10 million related to goodwill allocated to minor assets. Net of this impairment, the residual goodwill primarily referred to the retail network CGUs which relates to the acquisitions in Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovakia.

Other changes in goodwillintangible assets with indefinite useful lives in the amount of euro 1864 million referredinclude the accounting of goodwill related to impairments of euro 44 million of which euro 38 million primarily referred to Exploration & Production which has impaired the interest in goodwill recognized following the acquisition of Burren Energy Plc42.757% of Distrigas NV, following the finalization of the mandatory tender offer for the minorities with a 41.617% adhesion of the share capital, including the 31.25%

F-40


interest of Publigaz SCRL, the other major stakeholder of Distrigas, and the 1.14% interest through the squeeze-out procedure (euro 28903 million) and, of Lasmo Plc (euro 9 million). More information on acquisitions is includedas a decrease, the impairments in the Note 28 - Other information.

amount of euro 58 million related to the Refining & Marketing segment as described above.



1211 Investments


Equity-accounted investments

Investments accounted for using the equity method
Equity-accounted investments were as follows:

(euro million) Value at the beginning of the year Acquisition and subscriptions Share of profit of equity-accounted investments Share of loss of equity-accounted investments Deduction for dividends Currency translation differences Other changes Value at the end of the year
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dec. 31, 2007                 
Investments in unconsolidated entities controlled by Eni 

144

 

4

 

10

 

(2

) 

(9

) 

(6

)   

141

 
Joint ventures 

2,506

 

1,109

 

481

 

(130

) 

(351

) 

(173

) 

(132

) 

3,310

 
Associates 

1,236

 

813

 

415

 

(3

) 

(220

) 

(42

) 

(11

) 

2,188

 
 

3,886

 

1,926

 

906

 

(135

) 

(580

) 

(221

) 

(143

) 

5,639

 
Dec. 31, 2008                                 
Investments in unconsolidated entities controlled by Eni 

141

 

41

 

27

 

(6

) 

(5

) 

3

 

(24

) 

177

  141 41 27 (6) (5) 3 (24) 177
Joint ventures 

3,310

 

47

 

536

 

(94

) 

(444

) 

(123

) 

25

 

3,257

  3,310 47 536 (94) (444) (123) 25 3,257
Associates 

2,188

 

289

 

198

 

(5

) 

(266

) 

35

 

(402

) 

2,037

  2,188 289 198 (5) (266) 35 (402) 2,037
 

5,639

 

377

 

761

 

(105

) 

(715

) 

(85

) 

(401

) 

5,471

  5,639 377 761 (105) (715) (85) (401) 5,471
Dec. 31, 2009                
Investments in unconsolidated entities controlled by Eni 177 1 42 (4) (8) (3) 12 217
Joint ventures 3,257 25 478 (81) (254) (54) (44) 3,327
Associates 2,037 200 173 (156) (122) (31) 183 2,284
 5,471 226 693 (241) (384) (88) 151 5,828
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Acquisitions and subscriptions forin the amount of euro 377226 million related to the increase in subscription of capital increase forin the amount of euro 345224 million, of which euro 254181 million related to Angola LNG Ltd.

F-37


Share of profit of equity-accounted investments and the decrease following the distribution of the dividends referred to the following companies:

(euro million)  

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

    
  
    

Share of profit of equity-accounted investments

  

Deduction for dividends

  

Eni’s interest %

  

Share of profit of equity-accounted investments

  

Deduction for dividends

  

Eni’s interest %

  
 
 
 
 
 
Galp Energia SGPS SA 39 88 33.34 116 64 33.34 
Unión Fenosa Gas SA 

181

 

173

 

50.00

 

200

 

185

 

50.00

 200 185 50.00 108 138 50.00 
Artic Russia BV 29   60.00 103   60.00 
Trans Austria Gasleitung GmbH 39 28 89.00 84 22 89.00 
Eni BTC Ltd 16   100.00 35   100.00 
Blue Stream Pipeline Co BV 34   50.00 33   50.00 
United Gas Derivatives Co 

79

 

40

 

33.33

 

107

 

127

 

33.33

 107 127 33.33 24 40 24.55 (*)
EnBW Eni Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH 

64

 

42

 

50.00

 

40

 

22

 

50.00

 40 22 50.00 15   50.00 
Trans Austria Gasleitung GmbH 

43

 

28

 

89.00

 

39

 

28

 

89.00

Supermetanol CA 

34

 

36

 

34.51

 

39

 

34

 

34.51

 39 34 34.51 6 13 34.51 
Galp Energia SGPS SA 

255

 

126

 

33.34

 

39

 

88

 

33.34

Other investments 

250

 

135

   

297

 

231

   218 231   169 107   
 

906

 

580

   

761

 

715

   761 715   693 384   
  
 
 
 
 
 
(*)Equity ratio 33.33.

The shareShare of loss of equity-accounted investments in the amount of euro 105241 million primarily relatedrelates to Enirepsa GasCeska Rafinerska AS (euro 140 million) as a result of an impairment test on the refinery, Transmediterranean Pipeline Co Ltd (euro 4430 million) and Lipardiz - Construção de Estruturas Maritimas LdaSuper Octanos CA (euro 4021 million).

Other changes of euro 401 million are following the impairment on the relevant CGU mainly due to the exclusion from the equity-accounted investments and the inclusionnegative trends in exchange rates.

F-41


Other changes in the consolidation areaamount of Burren Energy Plc aftereuro 151 million include the acquisitionreclassification from receivables made for operating financing purposes associated with the contribution of controlthe Venezuelan activities of Corocoro (euro 153 million) to PetroSucre SA. Also an increase was recorded upon reclassification from assets classified as held for sale of Fertilizantes Nitrogenados de Oriente (euro 68 million). A decrease was recorded as a capital reimbursement was made by the Exploration & Production segmentjoint venture Artic Russia BV (euro 592111 million), the disposal upon divestment of Gaztransport et Technigaz SAS (euro 115 million). These effects were partially offset by the inclusiona 51% stake in the 60-40% owned joint-venture OOO SeverEnergia following the exercise of the call option by Gazprom on September 23, 2009. The transaction is worth U.S. $940 million net to Eni. Eni collected the first tranche of the price corresponding to approximately 25% of the whole amount for euro 155 million (or U.S. $230 million at the EUR/USD exchange rate of 1.48 as of the transaction date). A gain was recognized in the profit and loss on equity-accounted evaluation of the investments in Artic Russia BV in the amount of Angola LNG Ltd (euro 175 million).euro 103, of which euro 100 million related to the contractual remuneration at an annual rate of 9.4% accruing on the initial investment in the venture when it was acquired on April 4, 2007 in accordance with the arrangements between Eni and Gazprom.

F-38


The following table sets out the net carrying amount relating to equity-accounted:

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
  

Net carrying amount

 

Eni’s interest %

 

Net carrying amount

 

Eni’s interest %

  
 
 
 
Investments in unconsolidated entities controlled by Eni:                 
- Eni Btc Ltd 

42

 

100.00

 

62

 

100.00

- other investments (*) 

99

   

115

  
- Eni BTC Ltd 62 100.00 93 100.00 
- Other investments (1) 115   124   
 

141

   

177

   177   217   
Joint ventures:                 
- Artic Russia BV 

925

 

60.00

 

895

 

60.00

 895 60.00 918 60.00 
- Unión Fenosa Gas SA 

507

 

50.00

 

499

 

50.00

 499 50.00 473 50.00 
- Blue Stream Pipeline Co BV 

298

 

50.00

 

351

 

50.00

 351 50.00 371 50.00 
- EnBW Eni Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH 

256

 

50.00

 

268

 

50.00

 268 50.00 284 50.00 
- Azienda Energia e Servizi Torino SpA 

162

 

49.00

 

166

 

49.00

 166 49.00 170 49.00 
- Eteria Parohis Aeriou Thessalonikis AE 

154

 

49.00

 

158

 

49.00

 158 49.00 161 49.00 
- Toscana Energia SpA 

133

 

49.38

 

136

 

49.38

 136 49.38 143 49.38 
- Raffineria di Milazzo ScpA 

126

 

50.00

 

128

 

50.00

 128 50.00 128 50.00 
- Trans Austria Gasleitung GmbH 

96

 

89.00

 

109

 

89.00

 109 89.00 170 89.00 
- Super Octanos CA 

90

 

49.00

 

90

 

49.00

 90 49.00 66 49.00 
- Supermetanol CA 

78

 

34.51

 

90

 

34.51

 90 34.51 80 34.51 
- Unimar Llc 

71

 

50.00

 

65

 

50.00

 65 50.00 72 50.00 
- Eteria Parohis Aeriou Thessalias AE 

41

 

49.00

 

42

 

49.00

 42 49.00 43 49.00 
- Starstroi Llc 19 50.00 31 50.00 
- Transmediterranean Pipeline Co Ltd 

47

 

50.00

 

40

 

50.00

 40 50.00 8 50.00 
- Transitgas AG 

30

 

46.00

 

33

 

46.00

 33 46.00 33 46.00 
- Altergaz SA 

18

 

27.80

 

25

 

38.91

 25 38.91 28 41.62 
- Lipardiz - Construção de Estruturas Maritimas Lda 

88

 

50.00

 

10

 

50.00

- FPSO Mystras - Produção de Petròleo Lda 

58

 

50.00

 

2

 

50.00

- other investments (*) 

132

   

150

  
- Other investments (1) 143   148   
 

3,310

   

3,257

   3,257   3,327   
Associates:                 
- Galp Energia SGPS SA 

911

 

33.34

 

862

 

33.34

 862 33.34 914 33.34 
- Angola LNG Ltd     

453

 

13.60

 453 13.60 612 13.60 
- Ceska Rafinerska AS 

325

 

32.44

 

323

 

32.44

 323 32.44 184 32.44 
- PetroSucre SA 19 26.00 176 26.00 
- United Gas Derivatives Co 

140

 

33.33

 

128

 

33.33

 128 33.33 84 24.55 (2)
- Fertilizantes Nitrogenados de Oriente CEC 68 20.00 68 20.00 
- ACAM Gas SpA 

45

 

49.00

 

46

��

49.00

 46 49.00 47 49.00 
- Distribuidora de Gas del Centro SA 

33

 

31.35

 

32

 

31.35

 32 31.35 29 31.35 
- Burren Energy Plc 

592

 

24.90

    
- other investments (*) 

142

   

193

  
- Other investments (1) 106   170   
 

2,188

   

2,037

   2,037   2,284   
 

5,639

   

5,471

   5,471   5,828   
  
 
 
 
      
(*)(1)  Each individual amount included herein did not exceed euro 25 million.
(2)Equity ratio 33.33.

F-42


The net carrying amount of investments in not consolidatedunconsolidated entities controlled by Eni, joint ventures and associates include the differences between the purchase price and Eni’s equity in investments in the amount of euro 615521 million. Such differences primarily related to Unión Fenosa Gas SA (euro 195 million), EnBW - Eni Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH (euro 187181 million), and Galp Energia SGPS SA (euro 106 million) and Ceska Rafinerska AS (euro 97 million).

Artic Russia BV (the former Eni Russia BV) held 100% interest in three Russian companies acquired on April 4, 2007 in partnership with Enel (Eni 60%, Enel 40%), following award of a bid for Lot 2 in the Yukos liquidation procedure. The three companies – OAO Arctic Gas, OAO Urengoil and OAO Neftegaztechnologiya – engage in exploration and development of gas reserves.

Eni and Enel granted to Gazprom a call option to acquire a 51% interest in the three companies to be exercisable by Gazprom within 24 months from the acquisition date. Eni assesses the investment in Artic Russia BV under the equity method as it jointly controls the three entities based on ongoing shareholder arrangements, therefore exercising significant influence in the financial and operating policy decisions of the investees. This 60% interest corresponds to the present ownership interest of Eni in the acquired companies determined by not taking

F-39


into account the possible exercise of the call option by Gazprom. The carrying amount of the three entities is lower than the strike price of the call option with respect to the underlying stake. The strike price equals the bid price adjusted by subtracting dividends received and adding possible share capital increases, a contractual remuneration of 9.4% on the capital employed and additional financing expenses.

The fair value of listed investments was as follows:

  Shares Ownership
(%)
 Price per share
(euro)
 Fair value
(euro million)
    
  
  
  
Galp Energia SGPS SA 276,472,160 33.34 7.18 1,985 276,472,161 33.34 12.08 3,340
Altergaz SA 1,050,892 38.91 9.90 10 1,123,954 41.62 29.80 33
  
 
 
 

The table below sets out the provisions for losses included in the provisions for contingencies in the amount of euro 170 million (euro 119 million (euro 135 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008), which primarily relatedrelate to the following equity-accounted investments:

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
Charville - Consultores e Serviços Lda 31 33
Polimeri Europa Elastomeres France SA (under liquidation) 50 31
Industria Siciliana Acido Fosforico - ISAF - SpA (under liquidation) 28 27
Southern Gas Constructors Ltd 14 17
Other investments 12 11
  135 119


Industria Siciliana Acido Fosforico - ISAF SpA (under liquidation) 27 64
Cardon IV SA 11 32
Polimeri Europa Elastomeres France SA (under liquidation) 31 32
Charville - Consultores e Serviços Lda 33 21
Southern Gas Constructors Ltd 17 13
Other investments   8
  119 170
  
 

Other investments
Other investments were as follows:

(euro million) Net value at the beginning of the year Acquisition and subscriptions Currency translation differences Other changes Net value at the end of the year Gross value at the end of the year Accumulated impairment charges
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
Dec. 31, 2007               
Investments in unconsolidated entities controlled by Eni 

21

 

3

 

(1

) 

2

 

25

 

36

 

11

 
Associates 

9

     

1

 

10

 

11

 

1

 
Other investments 

330

 

190

 

(36

) 

(47

) 

437

 

443

 

6

 
 

360

 

193

 

(37

) 

(44

) 

472

 

490

 

18

 
Dec. 31, 2008                             
Investments in unconsolidated entities controlled by Eni 

25

 

1

   

4

 

30

 

41

 

11

  25 1   4 30 41 11
Associates 

10

     

(6

) 

4

 

28

 

24

  10     (6) 4 28 24
Other investments 

437

 

5

 

11

 

(77

) 

376

 

382

 

6

  437 5 11 (77) 376 382 6
 

472

 

6

 

11

 

(79

) 

410

 

451

 

41

  472 6 11 (79) 410 451 41
Dec. 31, 2009              
Investments in unconsolidated entities controlled by Eni 30   (1) 15 44 55 11
Associates 4     4 8 8 0
Other investments 376 4 (7) (9) 364 371 7
 410 4 (8) 10 416 434 18
  
 
 
 
 
 
 

Investments in not consolidatedunconsolidated entities controlled by Eni and associates are stated at cost net of impairment losses. Other investments, for which fair value cannot be reliably determined, were recognized at cost and adjusted for impairment losses.

F-40

F-43


The net carrying amount of other investments in the amount of euro 416 million (euro 410 million (euro 472 million atas of December 31, 2007) was related2008) relates to the following entities:

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
  

Net carrying amount

 

Eni’s interest %

 

Net carrying amount

 

Eni’s interest %

  
 
 
 
Investments in unconsolidated entities controlled by Eni (*) 

25

   

30

   30   44  
Associates 

10

   

4

   4   8  
        
Other investments:                
- Interconnector (UK) Ltd 

22

 

5.00

 

135

 

16.06

 135 16.06 134 16.06
- Nigeria LNG Ltd 

80

 

10.40

 

85

 

10.40

 85 10.40 82 10.40
- Darwin LNG Pty Ltd 

87

 

10.99

 

83

 

10.99

 83 10.99 78 10.99
- Angola LNG Ltd 

175

 

13.60

    
- other (*) 

73

   

73

  
- Other (*) 73   70  
 

437

   

376

   376   364  
 

472

   

410

   410   416  
  
 
 
 
      
(*)  Each individual amount included herein did not exceed euro 25 million.

Provisions for losses related to other investments, included within the provisions for contingencies, amounted to euro 41 million (euro 44 million (euro 28 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) and were primarily in relation to the following entities:

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
Caspian Pipeline Consortium R - Closed Joint Stock Co 25 24
Burren Energy Ship Management Ltd (Cyprus)   17
Other investments 3 3
  28 44


Burren Energy Ship Management Ltd 17 25
Caspian Pipeline Consortium R - Closed Joint Stock Co 24 15
Other investments 3 1
  44 41
  
 

Other information about investments
The following table summarizes key financial data, net to Eni, as disclosed in the latest available financial statements of not consolidatedunconsolidated entities controlled by Eni, joint ventures and associates:

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
  

Not consolidatedUnconsolidated entities controlled by Eni

 

Joint ventures

 

Associates

 

Not consolidatedUnconsolidated entities controlled by Eni

 

Joint ventures

 

Associates

  
 
 
 
 
 
Total assets 

1,247

 

7,781

 

4,252

 

1,361

 

7,761

 

4,020

 1,361 7,761 4,020 2,215 6,981 4,218
Total liabilities 

1,111

 

4,526

 

2,061

 

1,230

 

4,565

 

1,958

 1,230 4,565 1,958 2,081 3,721 1,929
Net sales from operations 

99

 

4,667

 

5,134

 

134

 

5,303

 

5,067

 134 5,303 5,067 65 3,936 5,718
Operating profit 

14

 

674

 

502

 

2

 

736

 

702

 2 736 702 (48) 564 141
Net profit 

14

 

318

 

410

 

20

 

490

 

690

 20 490 690 (9) 474 101
  
 
 
 
 
 

The total assets and liabilities of not consolidatedunconsolidated controlled entities of euro 2,215 million and euro 2,081 million respectively (euro 1,361 million and euro 1,230 million respectively (euro 1,247as of December 31, 2008) concerned for euro 1,873 million and euro 1,1111,860 million at December 31, 2007) concerned for euro(euro 923 million and euro 923 million (euro 873 million and euro 873 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) entities for which the consolidation does not produce significant effects. The residual amount referred to controlled entities which are not consolidated due to their immateriality based on the criteria of significance indicated in the "Basis of presentation".

F-41

F-44


1312 Other financial assets
Other financial assetsfinancing receivables were as follows:

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
Financing receivables:    
- receivables for financing operating activities 677 1,084
- receivables for financing non-operating activities 225  
  902 1,084
Securities:    
- securities held for operating purposes 21 50
  21 50
  923 1,134


Receivables for financing operating activities 1,084 1,112
Securities held for operating purposes 50 36
  1,134 1,148
  
 

Financing receivables are presented net of the allowance for impairment losses in the amount of euro 29 million (euro 26 million (euro 24 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008).

Operating financing receivables in the amount of euro 1,112 million (euro 1,084 million (euro 677 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) primarily concernedconsist of loans madeentered into by the Exploration & Production segment (euro 754580 million), Gas & Power segment (euro 311 million) and Refining & Marketing segment (euro 109 million) and Gas & Power segment (euro 76111 million), as well as receivables for financial leasing of euro 97 million (euro 128 million)million as of December 31, 2008). Receivables for financial leasing related to the disposal of the Belgian gas network by Finpipe GIE, companyare included in the consolidation area after the acquisition of control by the Gas & Power segment of Distrigas NV. The following table shows principal receivable by maturity date, which was obtained by summing future lease payment receivables discounted at the effective interest rate, interestinterests and the nominal value of future lease receivables:

(euro million) 

Maturity range

 
  
 
    

Within 12 months

  

Between one and five years

  

Beyond five years

  

Total

  
 
 
 
Principal receivable 

19

 

95

 

33

 

147

 19 77 20 116
Interests 

4

 

13

 

2

 

19

 6 11 1 18
Undiscounted value of future lease payments 

23

 

108

 

35

 

166

 25 88 21 134
  
 
 
 

Receivables with a maturity date within one year are shown in current assets in the item trade receivables for operating purposes - current portion of long-term receivables in the Note 3 - Trade and other receivables.

Non-operating financing receivables of euro 225 million at December 31, 2007 concerning a restricted deposit held by Eni Lasmo Plc as a guarantee of a debenture have been reclassified to current assets in the item financing receivables for non operating purposes in the Note 3 - Trade and other receivables.

Receivables in currencies other than euro amounted to euro 716 million (euro 827 million (euro 821 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008).

Receivables due beyond five years amounted to euro 460 million (euro 617 million (euro 509 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008).

Securities in the amount of euro 36 million (euro 50 million (euro 21 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008), designated as held-to-maturity investments, are listed securities, issued by foreign governments (euro 30 million) and by the Italian Government (euro 2021 million) and by foreign governments (euro 15 million). The increasedecrease of euro 2914 million referredrelates to Banque Eni SA.

Securities with a maturity beyond five years amounted to euro 20 million.

The fair value of financing receivables and securities did not differ significantly from their carrying amount. The fair value of financing receivables has been determined based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at rates ranging from 1.9%1.0% to 4.5% (1.9% and 3.9% (3.8% and 6.0% atas of December 31, 2007)2008). The fair value of securities was derived from quoted market prices.

F-42Receivables with related parties are described in Note 36 – Transactions with related parties.

F-45


1413 Deferred tax assets
Deferred tax assets were recognized net of deferred tax liabilities able to be offset forin the amount of euro 3,764 million (euro 3,468 million (euro 3,526 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008).

(euro million) 

Value at
Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Additions

 

Deductions

 

Currency translation differences

 

Other changes

 

Value at
Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
 
 
 
 
  

1,9152,912

  

1,7781,715

  

(7671,078

) 

(4328

) 

2937

  

2,9123,558

 
  
 
 
 
 
 

Deferred tax assets are described in Note 24 -23 – Deferred tax liabilities.




1514 Other non-current receivables
receivables
The following table provides an analysis of other non-current receivables:

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
Tax receivables from:    
- Italian tax authorities    
  . income tax 486 24
  . interest on tax credits 325 58
  . Value Added Tax (VAT) 42 2
  . other 11  
  864 84
- foreign tax authorities 30 28
  894 112
Other receivables:    
- in relation to disposals 7 780
- other non-current receivables 197 268
  204 1,048
Fair value cash flow hedge derivative instruments   197
Other asset 12 44
  1,110 1,401


Tax receivables from:    
- income tax 24 18
- interest on tax credits 58 55
- Value Added Tax (VAT) 2  
  84 73
- foreign tax authorities 28 39
  112 112
Other receivables:    
- in relation to disposals 780 710
- other non-current receivables 268 215
  1,048 925
Fair value of non-hedging derivatives 480 339
Fair value of cash flow hedge derivative instruments 197 129
Other asset 44 433
  1,881 1,938
  
 

The decrease of tax receivables of euro 782 million primarily referred to Eni SpA which obtained the reimbursement of the income tax and of the related interest of euro 746 million.

The otherOther receivables related to disposals amounting toin the amount of euro 780710 million relatedrelate to: (i) thea receivable of euro 501421 million recognized afterupon the agreement settledsigned with the Republic of Venezuela according to whichwhereby Eni will receive a cash compensation for the expropriated Dación assets, for a part of which was already received,collected. Eni is set to be paid incollect seven annual installments which yieldsyield interest income from the date of the settlement. More information is included in Note 9 - Other assets; andagreement. The 2009 installment of euro 71 million ($104 million) was paid through an equivalent assignment of hydrocarbons (compensation in-kind); (ii) thea receivable of euro 275279 million related to the disposal of the interest of 1.71% in the Kashagan project to the local partner kazMunaiGasKazMunaiGas on the basis of the agreements defined with the international partners of the North Caspian Sea PSA and the Kashagan government, which arewere effective starting from January 1, 2008.

F-46


The fair value of derivative contracts which do not meet the criteria to be classified as hedges under IFRS was as follows:

Dec. 31, 2008

Dec. 31, 2009



(euro million)

Fair value

Purchase commitments

Sale
commitments

Fair value

Purchase commitments

Sale
commitments







Non-hedging derivatives on exchange rate            
Interest Currency Swap 106 403 120 112 458 197
Currency swap 1 1 11 7 333 33
Other 29 13 48      
  136 417 179 119 791 230
Non-hedging derivatives on interest rate            
Interest rate swap 27 217 403 46 677 563
  27 217 403 46 677 563
Non-hedging derivatives on commodities            
Over the counter 317 207 859 172 540 659
Other       2 37  
  317 207 859 174 577 659
  480 841 1,441 339 2,045 1,452






The fair value of the derivative contracts is determined using market quotations provided by primary info-provider,information providers, or in the absence of such market information, the appropriate valuation methods generally accepted in the marketplace.

Fair values of non-hedging derivatives in the amount of euro 339 million (euro 480 million as of December 31, 2008) consisted of derivative contracts that do not meet the formal criteria to be designated as hedges under IFRS because they were entered into in order to manage the net business exposures in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices. Therefore, such derivatives were not related to specific trade or financing transactions.

Fair value of the cash flow hedge derivatives in the amount of euro 197129 million referredrefers to Distrigas NV (euro 105 million) and to the Exploration & Production segment (euro 92 million).NV. Further information on cash flow hedge derivatives is givenprovided in Note 7 -19 – Other current assets; fairliabilities. Fair value related to the contracts expiring beyond 20092010 is givenprovided in Note 25 -24 – Other non-current liabilities; fair value related to the contracts expiring in 20092010 is indicatedprovided in Note 7 - Other current assets and in Note 20 -19 – Other current liabilities. The effects of the evaluation at fair value of cash flow hedge derivatives are givenprovided in Note 27 -26 – Shareholders’ equity and in Note 32 - Finance income (expense).30 – Operating expenses.

F-43


The nominal value of cash flow hedge derivatives referredrelating to purchase and sale commitments foramounted to euro 6429 million and euro 1,268 million. 427 million, respectively.

Information on the hedged risks and the hedging policies is givenprovided in Note 29 -28 – Guarantees, commitments and risks.

Other asset in the amount of euro 433 million (euro 44 million as of December 31, 2008) included a deferred cost that relates to amounts of gas which were collected below minimum take quantities for the year provided by take-or-pay clauses contained in certain long-term gas purchase contracts. Those volumes were recorded to offset a trade payable for an amount of euro 255 million based on the contractual purchase price formula provided in the relevant contractual arrangements and the contractual percentage of advance, as aligned to their net realizable value as of year end. The Company expects to collect the underlying gas volumes over a period longer than the next twelve months.

F-47



Current liabilities


1615 Short-term debt
Short-term debt was as follows:

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
Banks 4,070 2,411 
Ordinary bonds 3,176 3,663 
Other financial institutions 517 285 
  7,763 6,359 


Banks 2,411 683
Ordinary bonds 3,663 2,718
Other financial institutions 285 144
  6,359 3,545
  
 

Short-term debt decreased by euro 1,4042,814 million primarily due to the balance of repayments and new proceeds (euro 1,6522,889 million), partially offset by currency translation differences (euro 193 million) and changes in the consolidation area (euro 48 million) due to the acquisition of Distrigas NV by the Gas & Power segment (euro 76 million) and the disposal of Agip España SA by the Refining & Marketing segment (euro 2897 million). Debt comprised of commercial paper in the amount of euro 2,718 million (euro 3,663 million (euro 3,176 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) which was mainly issued by the financial company Eni Finance USA Inc (euro 2,020 million) and Eni Coordination Center SA.SA (euro 698 million).

Short-term debt per currency is shown in the table below:

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
Euro 5,453 3,801 
U.S. dollar 1,591 1,332 
Other currencies 719 1,226 
  7,763 6,359 


Euro 3,801 1,143
U.S. dollar 1,332 2,321
Other currencies 1,226 81
  6,359 3,545
  
 

In 2008,2009, the weighted average interest rate on short-term debt was 4.2% (4.9%0.8% (4.2% in 2007)2008).

AtAs of December 31, 20082009, Eni had undrawn committed and uncommitted borrowing facilities available in the amount of euro 2,241 million and euro 9,533 million, respectively (euro 3,313 million and euro 7,696 million respectively (euro 5,006 million and euro 6,298 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008). These facilities were under interest rates that reflected market conditions. Charges forin unutilized facilities were not significant.




1716 Trade and other payables

Trade and other payables were as follows:

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
Trade payables 11,092 12,590 
Advances 1,483 2,916 
Other payables:     
- related to capital expenditures 1,301 1,716 
- others 3,240 3,293 
  4,541 5,009 
  17,116 20,515 


F-44


Trade payables 12,590 10,078
Advances 2,916 3,230
Other payables:    
- related to capital expenditures 1,716 1,541
- others 3,293 4,325
  5,009 5,866
  20,515 19,174
  
 

The increasedecrease in trade payables in the amount of euro 1,4982,512 million in trade payables was primarily related to the Gas & Power segment (euro 1,4171,640 million), the Engineering & Construction segment (euro 630619 million), the Exploration & Production segment (euro 658566 million) andwhich was partly offset by a decrease relating toan increase in the Refining & Marketing segment (euro 942 million) and the Petrochemical segment (euro 251266 million).

Advances in the amount of euro 3,230 million (euro 2,916 million (euro 1,483 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) were related to advances on contract work in progress forin the amount of euro 2,590 million (euro 2,516 million (euro 996 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) and other advances forin the amount of euro 640 million (euro 400 million (euro 487 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008).

F-48


Advances on contract work in progress were in respect ofrelated to the Engineering & Construction segment.

Other payables were as follows:

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
Payables due to:     
- joint venture operators in exploration and production activities 1,624 2,007 
- suppliers in relation to investments 1,015 1,057 
- non-financial government entities 397 441 
- employees 257 400 
- social security entities 226 284 
  3,519 4,189 
Other payables 1,022 820 
  4,541 5,009 


Payables due to:    
- joint venture operators in exploration and production activities 2,007 2,305
- suppliers in relation to investments 1,057 809
- non-financial government entities 441 661
- employees 400 451
- social security entities 284 292
  4,189 4,518
Other payables 820 1,348
  5,009 5,866
  
 

Payables towith related parties are described in Note 37 -36 – Transactions with related parties.

The fair value of trade and other payables did not differ significantly from their carrying amount considering the short-term maturity of trade payables.




1817 Income taxes payable

Income taxes payable were as follows:

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
Italian subsidiaries 247 808 
Foreign subsidiaries 1,441 1,141 
  1,688 1,949 


Italian subsidiaries 808 363
Foreign subsidiaries 1,141 928
  1,949 1,291
  
 

Income taxes payable by Italian subsidiaries were affected by the fair value valuation of cash flow hedging derivatives (euro 291137 million). This effect was recorded in the relevant provision within equity. Further information is provided in Note 7 -19 – Other current assets, Note 15 - Other non-current receivables, Note 20 - - Other current liabilities and Note 25 - Other non-current liabilities.




1918 Other taxes payable

Other taxes payable were as follows:

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
Excise and customs duties 804 920 
Other taxes and duties 579 740 
  1,383 1,660 


Excise and customs duties 920 832
Other taxes and duties 740 599
  1,660 1,431
  
 

F-45

F-49


2019 Other current liabilities
Other current liabilities were as follows:

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
Fair value of non-hedging derivatives 412 1,982 
Fair value of cash flow hedge derivatives 911 452 
Other liabilities 233 1,885 
  1,556 4,319 


Fair value of non-hedging derivatives 1,418 691
Fair value of cash flow hedge derivatives 452 680
Other liabilities 1,993 485
  3,863 1,856
  
 

Fair value of non-hedging derivative contracts was as follows:

  

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
(euro million)  

Fair value

  

Purchase commitments

  

Sale commitments

  

Fair value

  

Purchase commitments

  

Sale commitments

  
 
 
 
 
 
Non-hedging derivatives on exchange rate                        
Currency swap 

63

 

2,096

 

296

 

293

 

1,928

 

2,479

 211 1,234 2,379 113 3,044 2,487
Interest currency swap 

5

 

140

   

82

 

694

 

100

 78 694 60 8 113  
Other 

7

 

76

 

1

 

327

 

151

 

1,197

 299 101 1,181 135 107 684
 

75

 

2,312

 

297

 

702

 

2,773

 

3,776

 588 2,029 3,620 256 3,264 3,171
Non-hedging derivatives on interest rate                        
Interest rate swap 

24

 

722

 

401

 

134

 

641

 

3,002

 5 500   15   816
 

24

 

722

 

401

 

134

 

641

 

3,002

 5 500   15   816
Non-hedging derivatives on commodities                        
Over the counter 

12

 

49

 

58

 

1,090

 

3,297

 

388

 769 2,528 191 415 1,244 549
Other 

301

 

1,187

 

28

 

56

 

66

 

119

 56 66 119 5 2 54
 

313

 

1,236

 

86

 

1,146

 

3,363

 

507

 825 2,594 310 420 1,246 603
 

412

 

4,270

 

784

 

1,982

 

6,777

 

7,285

 1,418 5,123 3,930 691 4,510 4,590
  
 
 
 
 
 

Fair value of derivative contracts was determined by using market quotations reportedgiven by major market dataprimary information providers, or, if noabsent market information, was available, on the basis of valuation models generally accepted in the marketplace.

The increase in the fair valueFair values of non-hedging derivatives in the amount of euro 1,570691 million comprises the inclusion(euro 1,418 million as of theDecember 31, 2008) consisted of derivative contracts held by Distrigas NV which has been includedthat do not meet the formal criteria to be designated as hedges under IFRS because they were entered into in order to manage the consolidation area following the acquisition of control by the Gas & Power segment (euro 873 million).net business exposures in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices. Therefore, such derivatives were not related to specific trade or financing transactions.

The fair value of cash flow hedges amounted to euro 680 million (euro 452 million (euro 911 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) and related to Exploration & Production segment in the amount of euro 369 million and Distrigas NV forin the amount of euro 311 million (euro 37 million and euro 415 million andas of December 31, 2008, respectively). Fair value related to the Exploration & Production segment for euro 37 million (euro 911 million atreferred to the fair value of the future sale agreements of the proved oil reserves with deadlines in 2010. Those derivatives were entered into to hedge exposure to variability in future cash flows deriving from the sales during the 2008-2011 period of approximately 2% of Eni’s proved reserves as of December 31, 2007). Further information on2006 corresponding to 125.7 mmBBL, decreasing to 37.5 mmBBL as of December 31, 2009 due to transactions settled in the past year. These hedging transactions were undertaken in connection with acquisitions of oil and gas assets in the Gulf of Mexico and Congo that were executed in 2007. The Distrigas NV derivatives were designated to hedge surpluses or deficits of gas to achieve a proper balance in the gas portfolio.

Fair value of contracts expiring by 2010 is provided in Note 7 – Other current assets; fair value of contracts expiring beyond 2010 is provided in Note 24 – Other non-current liabilities and in Note 14 – Other non-current assets. The effects of the evaluation at fair value of cash flow hedge derivatives is givenare provided in Note 7 - Other current assets. The fair value related to the contracts expiring in 2009 is given in Note 7 - Other current assets, in Note 15 - Other non-current receivables and in Note 25 - Other non-current liabilities. The effects of fair value valuation of cash flow hedging derivatives are given in Note 27 -26 – Shareholders’ equity and in Note 32 - Finance income (expense).30 – Operating expenses.

The nominal value of cash flow hedge derivatives referredrelating to purchase and sale commitments foramount to euro 1,882 million and euro 272 million, respectively (euro 989 million and euro 895 million respectively (euro 1,399 million and euro 1,977 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008, respectively).

F-50


Information on the hedged risks and the hedging policies is givenprovided in Note 29 -28 – Guarantees, commitments and risks.

OtherThe decrease of other liabilities in the amount of euro 1,8851,508 million (euro 233mainly relate to the extinction of the euro 1,495 million at December 31, 2007) comprisedput option exercised by Publigaz. Eni granted the put option granted to Publigaz (the Distrigas minority shareholder) to divest its 31.25% stake in Distrigas NV to Eni for a total amount of euro 1,495 million based on the same per-share price of the ongoing mandatory tender offer to minorities as part of the Distrigas acquisition as provided for the Shareholders Agreement signed by the two partners on July 30, 2008. ThisNV acquisition. The relevant liability was recognized against the Group’s netwith a corresponding entry in a reserve within equity. In subsequent periods, changes in the put option value will be recognized against the profit and loss account.

F-46





Non-current liabilities

2120 Long-term debt and current portionmaturities of long-term debt

Long-term debt included the current portion maturing during the year following the balance sheet date (current maturity). The table below analyzes debt by year of forecasted repayment:

(euro million)

 At December 31   Long-term maturity
  
   

Type of debt instrument

 

Maturity range

 

2007

 

2008

 

Current maturity 2009

 

2010

 

2011

 

2012

 

2013

 

After

 

Total

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Towards banks:                    
- bank loans 2009-2019 

6,073

 

6,896

 

145

 

2,503

 

600

 

2,584

 

324

 

740

 

6,751

- other bank loans at favorable rates 2009-2012 

9

 

6

 

2

 

2

 

1

 

1

     

4

- other 2009-2010   

101

   

101

         

101

    

6,082

 

7,003

 

147

 

2,606

 

601

 

2,585

 

324

 

740

 

6,856

Ordinary bonds 2009-2037 

5,386

 

6,843

 

360

 

844

 

133

 

40

 

1,602

 

3,864

 

6,483

Other financial institutions 2009-2020 

599

 

632

 

42

 

180

 

63

 

62

 

55

 

230

 

590

    

12,067

 

14,478

 

549

 

3,630

 

797

 

2,687

 

1,981

 

4,834

 

13,929

Type of debt instrument

 

Maturity range

 

2008

 

2009

 

Current maturity 2010

 

2011

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014

 

After

 

Total

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Banks 2010-2029 7,003 9,056 2,028 1,106 3,559 323 1,122 918 7,028
Ordinary bonds 2010-2037 6,843 11,687 1,111 141 38 1,589 1,314 7,494 10,576
Other financial institutions 2010-2021 632 512 52 95 63 55 51 196 460
    14,478 21,255 3,191 1,342 3,660 1,967 2,487 8,608 18,064
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Long-term debt, including the current portion of long-term debt, of euro 21,255 million (euro 14,478 million (euro 12,067 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) increased by euro 2,4116,777 million. The increase mainly reflected the balance of payments and new proceeds of euro 2,4666,730 million as well as the change in the consolidation area (euro 286 million) primarily due to the acquisition of First Calgary Petroleums Ltd by the Exploration & Production segment that accounts for euro 229 million.

This increase was offset by the negative impact of foreign currency translation differences and translation differences arising on debt taken on by euro-reporting subsidiaries denominated in a foreign currenciescurrency which are translated into euroeuros at the year-end exchange rates (euro 383100 million). These increases were offset by currency translation differences resulting from the translation of financial statements denominated in currencies other than euro (euro 74 million).

Debt from banks in the amount of euro 9,056 million mainly relate to committed and uncommitted borrowing facilities in the amount of euro 4,030 million.

Debt from other financial institutions in the amount of euro 512 million (euro 632 million as of December 31, 2008) included euro 16124 million of finance lease transactions.transactions (euro 161 million as of December 31, 2008). The following table shows principal outstandingdecrease of euro 137 million mainly referred to the exercise of the option to purchase a drilling rig by maturity date, which was obtained by summing future lease payments discounted at the effective interest rate, interest and the nominal value of future lease payments:Engineering & Construction segment.

Maturity range

(euro million)

Within 12 months

Between one and five years

Beyond five years

Total





Principal debt outstanding 

134

 

22

 

5

 

161

Interests 

3

 

5

 

2

 

10

Undiscounted value of future lease payments 

137

 

27

 

7

 

171





Eni entered into long-term borrowing facilities with the European Investment Bank which were conditioned to the maintenance of certain performance indicators based on Eni’s consolidated financial statements or the maintenance of a rating not inferiorminimum level of rating. According to A- (S&P) and A3 (Moody’s). Atthe agreements, in case the latter condition is impaired, the Company shall provide new guarantees which the European Investment Bank finds to be satisfactory. As of December 31, 20072008 and 2008,2009, the amount of short and long-term debt subject to restrictive covenants was euro 1,4291,323 million and euro 1,3231,508 million, respectively. Eni considers that non-compliance with the above mentioned covenants does not produce significant effects. Furthermore, Saipem SpA entered into certain borrowing facilities forin the amount of euro 75 million (the same amount as of December 31, 2008) with a number of financial institutions subordinated to the maintenance of certain performance indicators based on the consolidated financial statements of Saipem. Eni and Saipem are in compliance with the covenants contained in their respective financing arrangements.

Bonds in the amount of euro 6,84311,687 million consisted of bonds issued withinthrough the Euro Medium Term Notes Program for a total of euro 6,3919,419 million and other bonds for a total of euro 4522,268 million.

F-47F-51


The following table analysesanalyzes bonds per issuing entity, maturity date, interest rate and currency as atof December 31, 2008:2009:

  

Amount

 

Discount on bond issue and accrued expense

 

Total

 

Currency

 

Maturity

 

% rate

          
 
(euro million)         

from

 

to

 

from

 

to

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Issuing entity                 
Euro Medium Term Notes                 
Eni SpA 

1,500

 

43

  

1,543

 

EUR

   

2013

   

4.625

Eni SpA 

1,250

 

(5

) 

1,245

 

EUR

   

2017

   

4.750

Eni SpA 

1,250

 

2

  

1,252

 

EUR

   

2014

   

5.875

Eni Coordination Center SA 

682

 

7

  

689

 

GBP

 

2010

 

2019

 

4.875

 

6.125

Eni SpA 

500

 

16

  

516

 

EUR

   

2010

   

6.125

Eni Coordination Center SA 

366

 

1

  

367

 

YEN

 

2012

 

2037

 

1.150

 

2.810

Eni Coordination Center SA 

350

 

10

  

360

 

EUR

 

2010

 

2028

 

2.876

 

5.441

Eni Coordination Center SA 

183

 

2

  

185

 

USD

 

2013

 

2015

 

4.450

 

4.800

Eni Coordination Center SA 

165

 

4

  

169

 

EUR

 

2009

 

2015

   

variable

Eni Coordination Center SA 

34

    

34

 

CHF

   

2010

   

2.043

Eni Coordination Center SA 

32

 

(1

) 

31

 

USD

   

2013

   

variable

  

6,312

 

79

  

6,391

          
Other bonds                 
Eni USA Inc 

287

 

3

  

290

 

USD

   

2027

   

7.300

Eni Lasmo Plc (*) 

157

 

(6

) 

151

 

GBP

   

2009

   

10.375

Eni UK Holding Plc 

11

    

11

 

GBP

   

2013

   

variable

  

455

 

(3

) 

452

          
  

6,767

 

76

  

6,843

          
Issuing entity                 
- Euro Medium Term Notes:                 
- Eni SpA 1,500 58  1,558 EUR   2016   5.000
- Eni SpA 1,500 44  1,544 EUR   2013   4.625
- Eni SpA 1,500 8  1,508 EUR   2019   4.125
- Eni SpA 1,250 66  1,316 EUR   2014   5.875
- Eni SpA 1,250 (4) 1,246 EUR   2017   4.750
- Eni Coordination Center SA 733 6  739 GBP 2010 2019 4.875 6.125
- Eni SpA 500 17  517 EUR   2010   6.125
- Eni Coordination Center SA 350 10  360 EUR 2010 2028 2.876 5.600
- Eni Coordination Center SA 346 2  348 YEN 2012 2037 1.150 2.810
- Eni Coordination Center SA 176 4  180 USD 2013 2015 4.450 4.800
- Eni Coordination Center SA 41 (1) 40 EUR 2011 2015   variable
- Eni Coordination Center SA 34    34 CHF   2010   2.043
- Eni Coordination Center SA 31 (2) 29 USD   2013   variable
  9,211 208  9,419          
Other bonds:                 
- Eni SpA 1,000 7  1,007 EUR   2015   4.000
- Eni SpA 1,000 (15) 985 EUR   2015   variable
- Eni USA Inc 277 (3) 274 USD   2027   7.300
- Eni UK Holding Plc 2    2 GBP   2013   variable
  2,279 (11) 2,268          
  11,490 197  11,687          
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(*)The bond is guaranteed by a restricted cash deposit recorded under non-current financial assets (euro 173 million).

As atof December 31, 20082009 bonds maturing within 18 months (euro 412993 million) were issued by Eni Coordination Center SA forin the amount of euro 261476 million and by Eni Lasmo Plc forSpA in the amount of euro 151517 million. During 2008,2009, Eni SpA Eni Coordination Center SA and Eni UK Holding Plc issued bonds forin the amount of euro 1,499 million, euro 302 million and euro 11 million respectively.5,058 million.

The following table shows the currency composition of long-term debt and its current portion and the related weighted average interest rates on total borrowings.

  

Dec. 31, 20072008
(euro million)

 

Average rate
(%)

 

Dec. 31, 20082009
(euro million)

 

Average rate
(%)

  
 
 
 
Euro 

9,973

 

4.4

 

12,284

 

4.2

 12,284 4.2 19,345 3.9
U.S. dollar 

900

 

8.6

 

912

 

6.1

 912 6.1 779 3.9
British pound 

882

 

6.2

 

859

 

6.2

 859 6.2 742 5.2
Japanese yen 

281

 

1.9

 

367

 

2.0

 367 2.0 348 2.0
Other currencies 

31

 

2.0

 

56

 

3.8

 56 3.8 41 3.0
 

12,067

   

14,478

   14,478   21,255  
  
 
 
 

AtAs of December 31, 20082009 Eni had undrawn committed long-term borrowing facilities in the amount of euro 2,850 million (euro 1,850 million (euro 1,400 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008). Interest rates on these contracts were at market conditions. Charges for unutilized facilities were not significant.

Fair value of long-term debt, including the current portion of long-term debt amounted to euro 22,320 million (euro 15,247 million (euro 12,390 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) and consisted of the following:

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
Ordinary bonds 5,523 7,505 
Banks 6,148 7,056 
Other financial institutions 719 686 
  12,390 15,247 


Ordinary bonds 7,505 12,618
Banks 7,056 9,152
Other financial institutions 686 550
  15,247 22,320
  
 

F-48F-52


Fair value was calculated by discounting the expected future cash flows at rates ranging from 1.4%1.0% to 4.5% (1.4% and 3.9% (3.8% and 6.0% atas of December 31, 2007)2008).

AtAs of December 31, 20082009 Eni pledgeddid not pledge restricted deposits as collateral against its borrowings for euro(euro 151 million (euro 198 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008).

Analysis of net borrowings, as defined in the "Item 5 – Operating and Financial Review and Prospects", was as follows:

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
  

Current

 

Non-current

 

Total

 

Current

 

Non-current

 

Total

  
 
 
 
 
 
A. Cash and cash equivalents 

2,114

   

2,114

 

1,939

   

1,939

 1,939   1,939 1,608   1,608
B. Available-for-sale securities 

174

   

174

 

185

   

185

 185   185 64   64
C. Liquidity (A+B) 

2,288

   

2,288

 

2,124

   

2,124

 2,124   2,124 1,672   1,672
D. Financing receivables 

990

 

225

 

1,215

 

337

   

337

 337   337 73   73
E. Short-term debt towards banks 

4,070

   

4,070

 

2,411

   

2,411

 2,411   2,411 683   683
F. Long-term debt towards banks 

161

 

5,921

 

6,082

 

147

 

6,856

 

7,003

 147 6,856 7,003 2,028 7,028 9,056
G. Bonds 

263

 

5,123

 

5,386

 

360

 

6,483

 

6,843

 360 6,483 6,843 1,111 10,576 11,687
H. Short-term debt towards related parties 

131

   

131

 

153

   

153

 153   153 147   147
I. Long-term debt towards related parties   

16

 

16

   

9

 

9

   9 9      
L. Other short-term debt 

3,562

   

3,562

 

3,795

   

3,795

 3,795   3,795 2,715   2,715
M. Other long-term debt 

313

 

270

 

583

 

42

 

581

 

623

 42 581 623 52 460 512
N. Total borrowings (E+F+G+H+I+L+M) 

8,500

 

11,330

 

19,830

 

6,908

 

13,929

 

20,837

 6,908 13,929 20,837 6,736 18,064 24,800
O. Net borrowings (N-C-D) 

5,222

 

11,105

 

16,327

 

4,447

 

13,929

 

18,376

 4,447 13,929 18,376 4,991 18,064 23,055
  
 
 
 
 
 

Available-for-sale securities in the amount of euro 64 million (euro 185 million (euro 174 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) were held for non-operating purposes.

Not included in the calculation above were held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities held for operating purposes amounting to euro 320 million (euro 360 million (euro 280 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008), of which euro 284 million (euro 302 million (euro 256 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) were held to provide coverage of technical reserves for Eni’s insurance companies.company, Eni Insurance Ltd.

Financing receivables in the amount of euro 73 million (euro 337 million (euro 1,215 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) were held for non-operating purposes.

Not included in the calculation above were financing receivables held for operating purposes amounting to euro 452 million (euro 487 million (euro 384 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008), of which euro 245 million (euro 399 million (euro 246 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) were in respect of securities granted to non-consolidatedunconsolidated subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates primarily in relation to the implementation of certain capital projects and a euro 47179 million cash deposit (euro 47 million as of December 31, 2008) to provide coverage offor Eni Insurance Ltd technical reserves. AtAs of December 31, 2007, non-current2008, current financial receivables in the amount of euro 225173 million were relatedreferred to a restricted deposit held by Eni Lasmo Plc as a guarantee of a debenture; the financial receivable has been reclassified in the current portion for euro 173 million.debenture.

F-49

F-53


2221 Provisions for contingencies
Provisions for contingencies were as follows:

(euro million) 

Value at Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Additions

 

Changes of estimated expenditures

 

Accretion discount

 

Reversal of utilized provisions

 

Reversal of unutilized provisions

 

Other changes

 

Value at Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Provision for site restoration and abandonment 

3,974

   

635

 

202

 

(113

) 

(8

) 

(116

) 

4,574

  4,574   317 212 (191) (5) (110) 4,797
Provision for environmental risks 

1,858

 

369

   

38

 

(333

) 

(9

) 

57

 

1,980

  1,980 280     (249) (22) (53) 1,936
Provision for legal and other proceedings 

716

 

90

   

1

 

(30

) 

(35

) 

70

 

812

  812 372     (62) (39) 85 1,168
Loss adjustments and actuarial provisions for Eni’s insurance companies 

418

 

1

       

(49

) 

34

 

404

 
Loss adjustments and actuarial provisions for Eni's insurance companies 404 135         (25) 514
Provisions for the supply of goods 

187

 

115

   

6

       

308

  308 35   10       353
Provision for taxes 

213

 

39

     

(3

) 

(10

) 

21

 

260

  260 46       (1) (9) 296
Provision for losses on investments 

163

 

21

       

(5

) 

(16

) 

163

  163 96       (39) (9) 211
Provisions for marketing and promotion initiatives 

65

 

75

     

(57

) 

(2

)   

81

 
Provision for onerous contracts 4 115     (26)   (3) 90
Provision for OIL insurance 

80

 

14

     

(13

) 

(8

) 

(1

) 

72

  72 9     (1) (1)   79
Provision for restructuring or decommissioning 

130

           

(114

) 

16

 
Provision for onerous contracts 

50

       

(50

)   

4

 

4

 
Other (*) 

632

 

418

 

(2

) 

2

 

(151

) 

(73

) 

73

 

899

  929 306 22 (4) (298) (72) (8) 875
 

8,486

 

1,142

 

633

 

249

 

(750

) 

(199

) 

12

 

9,573

  9,506 1,394 339 218 (827) (179) (132) 10,319
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
(*)  Each individual amount included herein does not exceed euro 50 million.

The provisionProvision for site restoration and abandonment in the amount of euro 4,5744,797 million primarily referred to the estimation of future costs relating to decommissioning of oil and natural gas production facilities at the end of the producing lives of fields, well-plugging, abandonment and site restoration (euro 4,4944,500 million). The increase in the provision for the year amounted to euro 635317 million and was primarily due to changes in the estimates of future costs made by subsidiaries in the Exploration & Production segment including Eni Norge ASPetroleum Co Inc (euro 183153 million), Eni UK Ltd (euro 9076 million) and Eni Petroleum Co IncSpA (euro 8251 million) with a corresponding entry to fixed assets.. Also an amount of euro 202212 million was recognized through profit and loss as the accretion charge for the period.

The discount rates adopted ranged from 1.9% to 8.8% (from 3.3% to 6.2% (from 4.2% to 6.2% atfor the year-ended December 31, 2007)2008). Other changes in the amount of euro 116110 million mainly related to the reclassification of the liabilities directly associated with assets held for sale (euro 188 million).

Offsetting this effect were negative currency translation differences which aroseresulted from the translation of financial statements denominated in currencies other than euro (euro 157 million). Offsetting this effect was the acquisition of Eni Hewett Ltd by the Exploration & Production segment (euro 5270 million).

The provisionProvision for environmental risks in the amount of euro 1,9801,936 million primarily related to the estimated future costs of remediation in accordance with existing laws and regulations recognizedand the estimated costs of reclamation and restoration sanctioned by the competent authorities. There provisions mainly relate to Syndial SpA (euro 1,3821,412 million) and to the Refining & Marketing segment (euro 394 million). The increases in the provision in the amount of euro 280 million were primarily related to Syndial SpA (euro 186 million) and the Refining & Marketing segment (euro 45468 million). The increaseDecreases in the provisionamount of euro 369249 million was primarily related to Syndial SpA (euro 222 million) and the Refining & Marketing segment (euro 108 million). Specifically, Syndial SpA recognized the estimated cost of the remediation of the divested area of Crotone as the clean-up has become probable and the associated costs can be reliably estimated. The decrease of euro 333 million waswere related to the reversal of utilized provisions primarily by Syndial SpA (euro 194 million) and the Refining & Marketing segment (euro 93125 million). Other changes of euro 57 million included the reclassification from the provision for restructuring or decommissioning made by the Refining & Marketing segment and Syndial SpA (euro 11497 million).

The provisionProvision for legal and other proceedings in the amount of euro 8121,168 million primarily included charges expected onfor the failure to perform certain contractual obligations and estimated future losses on pending litigation including legal, antitrust and administrative matters. These provisions are stated on the basis of Eni’s best estimate of the expected probable liability and primarily relaterelated to the Gas & Power segment (euro 452476 million), Engineering & Construction segment (euro 278 million), Syndial SpA (euro 225220 million), Eni Corporate (euro 79 million) and the Petrochemical segment (euro 3634 million). Other changesThe increases in the provision in the amount of euro 70372 million were essentially relatedincludes the estimate of a non-recurring item represented by a charge amounting to euro 250 million that was estimated based on management’s best knowledge of the possible resolution of the TSKJ matter with U.S. Authorities. The matter is fully disclosed in Note 28 – Guarantees, commitments and risks – Legal Proceedings. The charge is recognized in the segment results of the Engineering & Construction business as it relates to a project that was executed in Nigeria by the TSKJ joint venture. At the time of the project, the venture was participated by Snamprogetti Netherlands BV that was controlled by Snamprogetti SpA that was subsequently divested by the parent company Eni SpA to the changesubsidiary Saipem. On the occasion of the divestiture, Eni agreed to indemnify Saipem of all possible claims that might arise in connection with Snamprogetti involvement in the consolidation area followingTSKJ venture. As a result, the acquisitionfuture monetary settlement of Distrigas NVthe provision will be incurred by the Gas & Power segment (euro 68 million).Eni SpA and Saipem’s minorities will be left unaffected altogether.

F-54


Loss adjustments and actuarial provisions for Eni’s insurance companies in the amount of euro 404514 million representedrepresent the liabilities accrued for claims on insurance policies underwritten by Eni’s insurance company, Eni Insurance Ltd.

Provisions for the supply of goods forin the amount of euro 308353 million related to Eni SpA and includedinclude the estimated costs of the supply contracts.

F-50


The provisionProvision for taxes in the amount of euro 260296 million primarily included charges for unsettled tax claims in connection with uncertain applications of the tax regulationregulations for foreign subsidiaries of the Exploration & Production segment (euro 193176 million) and the Engineering & Construction segment (euro 66 million).

The provisionProvision for losses on investments in the amount of euro 163211 million was made with respect to losses onfrom investments in entities incurred to date, where the losses exceededexceed the carrying amount of the investments.

The provisionProvision for marketing and promotional initiatives amounted to euro 81 million and was made in respect of marketing initiatives involving awards and prizes to clientsonerous contracts in the Refining & Marketing segment.amount of euro 90 million relate to contracts for which the termination or execution costs exceed the relevant benefits.

The provisionProvision for OIL insurance cover in the amount of euro 7279 million includedinclude a mutual insurance provision forrelated to future increases inincrease of insurance chargecharges, as a result of accidents that occurred in past accidentsperiods that will be paid in the next 5 years by Eni for participating in the mutual insurance policy of Oil Insurance Ltd.

The provision for restructuring or decommissioning of unused production facilities of euro 16 million was primarily made for the estimated future costs of site restoration and remediation in connection with divestments and the closing of facilities in the Refining & Marketing segment (euro 10 million). Other changes of euro 114 million related to a reclassification to the provision for environmental risks made by the Refining & Marketing segment.

The provision for onerous contracts of euro 4 million related to contracts for which the termination or execution costs exceed the benefits. The reversal of utilized provisions related to Syndial SpA.




2322 Provisions for employee benefits
Provisions for employee benefits were as follows:

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
TFR 499 458 
Foreign pension plans 219 223 
Supplementary medical reserve for Eni managers (FISDE) and other foreign medical plans 99 98 
Other benefits 118 168 
  935 947 


TFR 458 445
Foreign pension plans 223 204
Supplementary medical reserve for Eni managers (FISDE) and other foreign medical plans 98 107
Other benefits 168 188
  947 944
  
 

Provisions for indemnities upon termination of employment primarily relatedrelate to the provisions accrued by Italian companies for employee termination indemnities ("TFR"), which are determined using actuarial techniques and is regulated by Article 2120 of the Italian Civil Code.

The indemnity is paid upon retirement as a lump sum payment in the amount of which corresponds to the total of the provisions accrued during the employee’semployees’ service period based on payroll costs as revalued until retirement. Following the changes in the regime, starting from January 1, 2007 the amount already then accrued and the future benefits have been transferred to awill be put in pension fundfunds or the treasury fund custodiedheld by the Italian administration for post-retirement benefits (INPS). CompaniesFor companies with less than 50 employees, can choose notit will be possible to adoptcontinue the new scheme.scheme as in previous years. Therefore, the allocation of future TFR provisions to pension funds or the INPS treasury fund determines that these amounts will be classified as costs to provide benefits under a defined contribution plan. Past unpaid amounts accrued as atof December 31, 2006 for post-retirement indemnities under the Italian TFR regime continue to represent costs to provide benefits under a defined benefit plan and must be assessed based on actuarial assumptions.

Pension funds are defined benefit plans provided by foreign subsidiaries located mainly in Nigeria and in Germany. Benefits under these plans consistedconsist of payments based on seniority and the salary paid in the last year of service, or alternatively, the average annual salary over a defined period prior to retirement.

Group companies provide healthcare benefits to retired managers. Liability tofor these plans (FISDE and other foreign healthcare plans) and the current cost are limited to the contributions made by the company.

Other benefits primarily related to a deferred cash incentive scheme for managers and certain Jubilee awards. The provision for the deferred cash incentive scheme is assessed based on the likelihood thatprobability of the company willreaching

F-51F-55


reach planned targets and the employees will reachemployee reaching individual performance goals. Jubilee awards are benefits due following the attainment of a minimum period of service and, for the Italian companies, consist of an in-kind remuneration.

The value of employee benefits, estimated by applying actuarial techniques, consistedconsists of the following:

 Foreign pension plans 
 
 
(euro million) 

TFR

 

Gross liability

 

Plan assets

 

FISDE
and other foreign medical plans

 

Other benefits

 

Total

  
 
 
 
 
 
2007             
Current value of benefit liabilities and plan assets at beginning of year 

614

 

771

 

(440

) 

91

 

95

 

1,131

 
Current cost 

13

 

13

   

1

 

38

 

65

 
Interest cost 

23

 

32

   

4

 

2

 

61

 
Expected return on plan assets     

(23

)     

(23

)
Employee contributions     

(126

)     

(126

)
Actuarial gains (losses) 

(52

) 

3

 

12

 

1

 

(1

) 

(37

)
Benefits paid 

(64

) 

(35

) 

18

 

(6

) 

(7

) 

(94

)
Amendments 

1

 

2

       

3

 
Curtailments and settlements 

(62

) 

(201

) 

201

     

(62

)
Currency translation differences and other changes 

3

 

36

 

(4

) 

1

 

(9

) 

27

 
Current value of benefit liabilities and plan assets at end of year 

476

 

621

 

(362

) 

92

 

118

 

945

 
2008                          
Current value of benefit liabilities and plan assets at beginning of year 

476

 

621

 

(362

) 

92

 

118

 

945

  476 621 (362) 92 118 945 
Current cost   

21

   

1

 

48

 

70

    21   1 48 70 
Interest cost 

25

 

28

   

5

 

5

 

63

  25 28   5 5 63 
Expected return on plan assets     

(25

)     

(25

)     (25)     (25)
Employee contributions   

(1

) 

(41

)     

(42

)   (1) (41)     (42)
Actuarial gains (losses) 

8

 

(11

) 

102

 

3

 

3

 

105

  8 (11) 102 3 3 105 
Benefits paid 

(65

) 

(25

) 

20

 

(7

) 

(7

) 

(84

) (65) (25) 20 (7) (7) (84)
Curtailments and settlements       

(2

)   

(2

)       (2)   (2)
Currency translation differences and other changes 

(1

) 

169

 

(147

) 

2

 

1

 

24

  (1) 169 (147) 2 1 24 
Current value of benefit liabilities and plan assets at end of year 

443

 

802

 

(453

) 

94

 

168

 

1,054

  443 802 (453) 94 168 1,054 
2009             
Current value of benefit liabilities and plan assets at beginning of year 443 802 (453) 94 168 1,054 
Current cost   27   2 45 74 
Interest cost 26 22   6 6 60 
Amendments   81   10   91 
Expected return on plan assets     (16)     (16)
Employee contributions   1 (42)     (41)
Actuarial gains (losses) 18 301 (16) 9 4 316 
Benefits paid (41) (45) 22 (7) (39) (110)
Curtailments and settlements   (15) 14     (1)
Currency translation differences and other changes 1 (28) (9) 1 4 (31)
Current value of benefit liabilities and plan assets at end of year 447 1,146 (500) 115 188 1,396 
  
 
 
 
 
 

The gross liability for foreign employee pension plans in the amount of euro 1,146 million (euro 802 million (euro 621 million atas of December 31, 2007) included2008) include the liabilities related to joint ventures operating in exploration and production activities forin the amount of euro 6777 million and euro 7762 million atas of December 31, 20072008 and 2008,2009, respectively. A receivable of an amount equivalent to such liability was recorded. Other benefits in the amount of euro 188 million (euro 168 million (euro 118 million atas of December 31, 2007) primarily concerned2008) mainly relate to the deferred monetary incentive plan forin the amount of euro 119 million (euro 107 million (euro 69 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) and jubileeJubilee awards forin the amount of euro 52 million (euro 47 million (euro 40 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008).

F-52

F-56


The reconciliation analysis of benefit obligations toand plan assets was as follows:

  TFR Foreign pension plans FISDE and other foreign medical plans Other benefits
  
 
 
 
(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20072008

Dec. 31, 2009

 

Dec. 31, 2008

 

Dec. 31, 20072009

 

Dec. 31, 2008

 

Dec. 31, 20072009

 

Dec. 31, 2008

 

Dec. 31, 2007

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Present value of benefit obligations with plan assets     

439

 

610

             610 935        
Present value of plan assets     

(362

) 

(453

)             (453) (500)        
Net present value of benefit obligations with plan assets     

77

 

157

             157 435        
Present value of benefit obligations without plan assets 

476

 

443

 

182

 

192

 

92

 

94

 

118

 

168

 443 447 192 211 94 115 168 188
Actuarial gains (losses) not recognized 

23

 

15

 

(33

) 

(126

) 

7

 

4

     15 (2) (126) (442) 4 (6)    
Past service cost not recognized     

(7

)                     (2)    
Net liabilities recognized in provisions for employee benefits 

499

 

458

 

219

 

223

 

99

 

98

 

118

 

168

 458 445 223 204 98 107 168 188
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Costs charged to the profit and loss account were as follows:

(euro million) 

TFR

 

Foreign pension plans

 

FISDE and other foreign medical plans

 

Other benefits

 

Total

  
 
 
 
 
2007           
Current cost 

13

 

13

 

1

 

38

 

65

 
Interest cost 

23

 

32

 

4

 

2

 

61

 
Expected return on plan assets   

(23

)     

(23

)
Amortization of actuarial gains (losses) 

1

 

3

     

4

 
Effect of curtailments and settlements 

(83

) 

41

     

(42

)
 

(46

) 

66

 

5

 

40

 

65

 
2008                      
Current cost   

19

 

1

 

48

 

70

    21 1 48 70 
Interest cost 

25

 

28

 

5

 

5

 

63

  25 28 5 5 63 
Expected return on plan assets   

(25

)     

(25

)   (25)     (25)
Amortization of actuarial gains (losses)   

1

     

1

    1     1 
Effect of curtailments and settlements     

(2

)   

(2

)     (2)   (2)
 

25

 

25

 

4

 

53

 

107

  25 25 4 53 107 
2009           
Current cost   27 2 45 74 
Interest cost 26 22 6 6 60 
Expected return on plan assets   (16)     (16)
Amortization of actuarial gains (losses)   10 7 4 21 
Effect of curtailments and settlements   1   (3) (2)
 26 44 15 52 137 
  
 
 
 
 

The main actuarial assumptions used forin the valuationevaluation of post-retirement benefit obligations at year-endyear end and forin the estimate of costs expected for 20092010 were as follows:

(%) 

TFR

 

Foreign pension plans

 

FISDE and other foreign medical plans

 

Other benefits

  
 
 
 
2007        
2008        
Discount rate 

5.4

 

3.5-13.0

 

5.5

 

4.8-5.4

 6.0 3.5-13.0 6.0 5.2-6.0
Expected return rate on plan assets   

4.0-13.0

       4.5-13.0    
Rate of compensation increase 

2.7-3.0

 

2.0-12.0

   

2.7-4.0

 2.7-3.0 2.4-13.0   2.7-4.0
Rate of price inflation 

2.0

 

1.0-10.0

 

2.0

 

2.0

 2.5 1.3-11.0 2.5 2.5
                
2008        
2009        
Discount rate 

6.0

 

3.5-13.0

 

6.0

 

5.2-6.0

 5.0 2.7-11.0 5.0 2.0-5.0
Expected return rate on plan assets   

4.5-13.0

       4.0-13.0    
Rate of compensation increase 

2.7-3.0

 

2.4-13.0

   

2.7-4.0

 3.0 2.7-14.0    
Rate of price inflation 

2.5

 

1.3-11.0

 

2.5

 

2.5

 2.0 0.9-10.0 2.0 2.0
  
 
 
 

F-53F-57


With regards to Italian plans, demographic tables prepared by Ragioneria Generale dello Stato (RG48) were used. The expectedExpected return rate by plan assets has been determined by reference to quoted prices expressed in regulated markets.

Plan assets consisted of the following:

(%) 

Plan assets

 

Expected return

  
 
Securities 6.910.0 6.6-8.96.0-7.5
Bonds 20.428.8 2.8-10.02.4-13.0
Real estate 1.81.6 5.4-15.06.0-7.5
Other 70.959.6 2.0-13.00.5-13.0
Total 100.0  
  
 

The effective return onof the plan assets amounted to azero (a cost in the amount of euro 77 million (a profit of euro 11 million atfor the year ended December 31, 2007)2008).

With reference to healthcare plans, the effects deriving from a 1% change of the actuarial assumptions of medical costs were as follows:

(euro million) 

1% Increase

 

1% Decrease

  
 
Impact on the current costs and interest costs 1 (1) 1 (1)
Impact on net benefit obligation 10 (9) 14 (12)
  
 

The amount expected to be accrued tofor defined benefit plans for 2009 isin 2010 amounted to euro 3288 million.

The analysis of changes in the actuarial valuation of the net liability with respect to prior year deriving from the non-correspondence of actuarial assumptions with actual values recorded at year-end was as follows:

(euro million) 

TFR

 

Foreign pension plans

 

FISDE and other foreign medical plans

 

Other benefits

  
 
 
 
2007         
Impact on net benefit obligation 

(8

) 

6

     
Impact on plan assets   

3

     
2008                 
Impact on net benefit obligation 

7

 

15

 

3

 

1

  7 15 3 1
Impact on plan assets   

(62

)        (62)    
2009        
Impact on net benefit obligation (7) 4 3 2
Impact on plan assets   (16)    
  
 
 
 



2423 Deferred tax liabilities
Deferred tax liabilities were recognized net of offsettable deferred tax assets forin the amount of euro 3,764 million (euro 3,468 million (euro 3,526 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008).

(euro million) 

Value at
Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Additions

 

Deductions

 

Changes in the scope of consolidation

 

Currency translation differences

 

Other changes

 

Value at
Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

5,4715,784

 

952631

 

(2,3351,434

) 

1,6843

 

(3822

) 

8(55

)

5,7424,907

  
 
 
 
 
 
 

F-54F-58


Deferred tax liabilitiesassets and deferred tax assetsliabilities consisted of the following:

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
Deferred tax liabilities 

8,997

 

9,210

  9,252 8,671 
Deferred tax assets available for offset 

(3,526

) 

(3,468

) (3,468) (3,764)
 

5,471

 

5,742

  5,784 4,907 
Deferred tax assets not available for offset 

(1,915

) 

(2,912

) (2,912) (3,558)
 

3,556

 

2,830

  2,872 1,349 
  
 

The most significant temporary differences giving rise to net deferred tax liabilities were as follows:

(euro million) 

Value at
Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Additions

 

Deductions

 

Currency translation differences

 

Other changes

 

Value at
Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred tax liabilities:                          
- accelerated tax depreciation 

6,257

 

212

 

(895

) 

(60

) 

(148

) 

5,366

  5,366 238 (392) (6) (34) 5,172 
- site restoration and abandonment (tangible assets) 

539

 

191

 

(30

) 

(32

) 

(14

) 

654

  654 59 (132) 27 (59) 549 
- capitalized interest expense 

177

 

10

 

(15

)   

1

 

173

  173 3 (15)   (2) 159 
- application of the weighted average cost method in evaluation of inventories 

731

 

335

 

(1,070

)   

83

 

79

  79 31 (91)   42 61 
- other 

1,293

 

204

 

(325

) 

54

 

1,712

 

2,938

  2,980 300 (804) (43) 297 2,730 
 

8,997

 

952

 

(2,335

) 

(38

) 

1,634

 

9,210

  9,252 631 (1,434) (22) 244 8,671 
Deferred tax assets:                          
- site restoration and abandonment (provisions for contingencies) 

(1,363

) 

(244

) 

17

 

45

 

(27

) 

(1,572

) (1,572) (84) 100 (8) 79 (1,485)
- accruals for impairment losses and provisions for contingencies 

(913

) 

(701

) 

235

 

3

 

(21

) 

(1,397

) (1,397) (334) 309   32 (1,390)
- depreciation and amortization 

(622

) 

(278

) 

48

 

(42

) 

(16

) 

(910

) (910) (474) 140 33 25 (1,186)
- assets revaluation as per Laws No. 342/2000 and No. 448/2001 

(788

)   

60

   

(7

) 

(735

) (735)   58     (677)
- carry-forward tax losses 

(79

) 

(10

) 

37

 

1

 

(6

) 

(57

) (57) (150) 40 (7)   (174)
- other 

(1,676

) 

(545

) 

370

 

36

 

106

 

(1,709

) (1,709) (673) 431 10 (469) (2,410)
 

(5,441

) 

(1,778

) 

767

 

43

 

29

 

(6,380

) (6,380) (1,715) 1,078 28 (333) (7,322)
Net deferred tax liabilities 

3,556

 

(826

) 

(1,568

) 

5

 

1,663

 

2,830

  2,872 (1,084) (356) 6 (89) 1,349 
  
 
 
 
 
 

Deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences to the extent that it is probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available against which part or all of the deductible temporary differences can be utilized. WhenIn the case where future taxable profit is no longer deemed to be sufficient to absorb all existing deferred tax assets, any surplus is written off.

Other changesNo deferred tax liabilities were recognized on undistributed reserves of the shareholders’ equity considered to be reinvested indefinitely (approximately euro 1,663 million included: (i)41,000 million). The determination of the tax effect relating to such reinvested reserves is not praticable.

Other changes in the consolidation area foramount of euro 1,45689 million following of the acquisition made by the Exploration & Production segment of Burren Energy Plc (euro 733 million), of First Calgary Petroleums Ltd (euro 108 million), of Eni Hewett Ltd (euro 91 million) and of Hindustan Oil Exploration Co Ltd (euro 31 million), the acquisition made by the Gas & Power segment of Distrigas NV (euro 504 million) and the disposal done by the Refining & Marketing segment of Agip España SA (euro 11 million); and (ii)includes the recognition of the deferred tax effect against equity on the fair value evaluation of derivatives designated as cash flow hedge forhedges in the amount of euro 7665 million. Further information on cash flow hedginghedge derivatives is givenprovided in Note 7 -19 – Other current assets, in Note 15 - Other non-current receivables and in Note 25 - Other non-current liabilities.

Italian taxation law allows the carry-forward of tax losses over the five subsequent years. Losses suffered in the first three years of the company’s life can, however, be, for the most part, carried forward indefinitely. Foreign taxation laws allow, on average, the carry-forward of tax losses over a period higher than the five subsequent years, and in many cases, indefinitely. The tax rate applied by the Italian subsidiaries to determine the portion of carry-forwardscarry-forward tax losses to be utilized equaled 33%25.8%; 33.73%this rate equaled on average to 28.2% for foreign entities.

F-55F-59


Carry-forward tax losses in the amount of euro 1,0241,532 million can be used in the following periods:

(euro million) 

Italian
subsidiaries

 

Foreign
subsidiaries

  
 
2009 41 7 
2010   12     
2011   1    2
2012        1
2013 6 3  7  
Beyond 2013 3 14 
2014 107 43
Beyond 2014 64 19
Without limit 38 899  16 1,273
 88 936  194 1,338
  
 

Carry-forward tax losses in the amount of euro 171634 million expected to be offset against future taxable profit and were in respect of Italian subsidiaries forin the amount of euro 88194 million and of foreign subsidiaries forin the amount of euro 83440 million. Deferred tax assets recognized on these losses amounted to euro 2950 million and euro 28124 million, respectively.




2524 Other non-current liabilities

Other non-current liabilities were as follows:

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
Fair value of cash flow hedge derivatives 1,340 499 
Current income tax liabilities 215 254 
Payables related to capital expenditures 22   
Other payables 295 55 
Other liabilities 159 1,730 
  2,031 2,538 


Fair value of non-hedging derivatives 564 372
Fair value of cash flow hedge derivatives 499 436
Current income tax liabilities 254 52
Other payables 55 54
Other liabilities 1,730 1,566
  3,102 2,480
  
 

The fairFair value of derivative contracts was determined by using market quotations reportedgiven by major market dataprimary information providers, or, if noin lack of market information, was available, on the basis of generally accepted methods for financial valuations.

The fairFair value of non-hedging derivatives was as follows:

Dec. 31, 2008

Dec. 31, 2009



(euro million)

Fair value

Purchase commitments

Sale commitments

Fair value

Purchase commitments

Sale commitments







Non-hedging derivatives on exchange rate            
Currency swap 82 694 100 10 296 94
Interest currency swap 4   40 23 394  
Other 28 50 16      
  114 744 156 33 690 94
Non-hedging derivatives on interest rate            
Interest rate swap 129 141 3,002 137 41 4,030
  129 141 3,002 137 41 4,030
Non-hedging derivatives on commodities            
Over the counter 321 769 197 199 850 219
Other       3 12 9
  321 769 197 202 862 228
  564 1,654 3,355 372 1,593 4,352






F-60


Fair value of non-hedging derivatives in the amount of euro 372 million (euro 564 million as of December 31, 2008) referred to derivative contracts that do not meet the formal criteria to be designated as hedges under IFRS because they were entered into in order to manage the net business exposures in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices. Therefore, such derivatives were not related to specific trade or financing transactions.

Fair value of cash flow hedginghedge derivatives amounted to euro 436 million (euro 499 million (euro 1,340 million atas of December 31, 2007) and2008) related to Distrigas NV in the amount of euro 275 million (euro 235 million as of December 31, 2008) and the Exploration & Production segment forin the amount of euro 161 million (euro 264 million (euro 1,340 million atas of December 31, 2007) and to Distrigas NV (euro 235 million)2008).

Further information on cash flow hedginghedge derivatives is givenprovided in Note 19 – Other current liabilities. Fair value of contracts expiring beyond 2010 is provided in Note 14 – Other non-current receivables; fair value of contracts expiring by 2010 is provided in Note 19 – Other current liabilities and Note 7 - Other current assets. The fair value related to the contracts expiring in 2009 is given in Note 7 - Other current assets, in Note 15 - Other non-current receivables and in Note 25 - - Other non-current liabilities. The effects of the evaluation at the fair value valuation of cash flow hedginghedge derivatives are givenprovided in Note 27 -26 – Shareholders’ equity and in Note 32 - Finance income (expense).30 – Operating expenses.

The nominal value of thesethe derivatives referredrelating to purchase and sale commitments foramounted to euro 1,544 million and euro 129 million, respectively (euro 1,878 million and euro 1,832 million respectively (euro 2,804 million and euro 3,404 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008, respectively).

Information on the hedged risks and the hedging policies is shown in Note 29 -28 – Guarantees, commitments and risks.

The group’s liability for current income taxes in the amount of euro 52 million (euro 254 million (euro 215 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) was due as a special tax (with a rate lower than the statutory tax rate), relating to the option to increase the deductible tax bases of certain tangible and other assets to their carrying amounts as permitted by the 2008 Budget Law.

Other liabilities in the amount of euro 1,566 million (euro 1,730 million (euro 159 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) included advances received by Suez following the long-term supply of natural gas and electricity in the amount of euro 1,455 million (euro 1,552 million.

F-56


million as of December 31, 2008).


2625 Assets classified as held for sale and liabilities directly associated with the assets classified as held for sale
Non-current assets held for sale and liabilities directly associated liabilities relatedwith non-current assets held for sale amounted to euro 542 million and euro 276 million, respectively, which mainly relate to the divestment of certain mineral properties in Italy which were contributed in kind to two new entities, Società Padana Energia SpA and Società Adriatica Idrocarburi SpA, for the disposal of Fertlizantes Nitrogenados de Oriente,Gas Brasiliano Distribuidora SA, a company specializedoperating in the productiondistribution and marketing of fertilizers.natural gas in an area of São Paulo state in Brazil, and Distri RE SA, a company acquired following the acquisition of Distrigas NV. The disposals to third parties are under negotiation.


F-61


2726 Shareholders’ equity

Minority interest
MinorityProfit attributable to minority interest and the attributable profit with reference tominority interest in certain consolidated subsidiaries related to:

(euro million) 

Net profit

 

Shareholders’ equity

  
 
  

2007

 

2008

 

Dec. 31, 2007

 

Dec. 31, 2008

  
 
 
 
Saipem SpA 

514

 

407

  

1,299

 

1,560

Distrigas NV   

74

    

1,162

Snam Rete Gas SpA 

268

 

254

  

865

 

948

Hindustan Oil Exploration Co Ltd   

(1

)   

128

Tigàz Tiszàntùli Gàzszolgàltatò Részvénytàrsasàg 

1

 

(11

) 

79

 

65

Others 

15

 

10

  

196

 

211

  

798

 

733

  

2,439

 

4,074

  

2008

 

2009

 

Dec. 31, 2008

 

Dec. 31, 2009

  
 
 
 
Saipem SpA 407  567 1,560 2,005
Snam Rete Gas SpA 254  369 948 1,568
Hindustan Oil Exploration Co Ltd (1) 1 128 123
Tigàz Tiszàntùli Gàzszolgàltatò Részvénytàrsasàg (11) 8 65 72
Distrigas NV 74    1,162  
Others 10  5 211 210
  733  950 4,074 3,978
  
 
 
 

The increase in Snam Rete Gas SpA equity is due to the increase in the share capital for the minority shareholders’ contribution (euro 1,542 million) partially offset by the effect of acquisition from Eni of Italgas SpA and Stogit SpA (euro 1,086 million). The zero amount of the minority interests in Distrigas NV is due to the acquisition of the entire share capital of the company through the finalization of the mandatory tender offer on the minorities of Distrigas. Shareholders, including Publigaz with its entire interest (31.25%), tendered shares representing 41.617% of the share capital of Distrigas. The residual 1.14% of the share capital has been acquired by Eni through a squeeze-out.

Eni shareholders’ equity
Eni’s net equity atas of December 31, 2008 and 2009 was as follows:

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
Share capital 

4,005

 

4,005

  4,005 4,005 
Legal reserve 

959

 

959

  959 959 
Reserve for treasury shares 

7,207

 

7,187

  7,187 6,757 
Cumulative foreign currency translation differences 

(2,233

) 

(969

)
Reserve related to the fair value of cash flow hedging derivatives net of the tax effect (90) (439)
Reserve related to the fair value of available-for-sale securities net of the tax effect 4 5 
Other reserves 

(914

) 

(1,140

) (1,054) 1,492 
Cumulative currency translation differences (969) (1,665)
Treasury shares (6,757) (6,757)
Retained earnings 

29,591

 

34,685

  34,685 39,160 
Treasury shares 

(5,999

) 

(6,757

)
Interim dividend 

(2,199

) 

(2,359

) (2,359) (1,811)
Net profit for the period 

10,011

 

8,825

  8,825 4,367 
 

40,428

 

44,436

  44,436 46,073 
  
 

Share capital
AtAs of December 31, 20082009 the parent company’s issued share capital consisted of 4,005,358,876 shares (nominal value euro 1 each) fully paid-up (the same amount atas of December 31, 2007)2008).

On April 29, 200830, 2009 Eni’s Shareholders’ Meeting declared a dividend distribution of euro 0.700.65 per share, with the exclusion of treasury shares held at the ex-dividend date, in full settlement of the 20072008 dividend of euro 1.30 per share, of which euro 0.600.65 per share paid as interim dividend. The balance was paidpayable on May 22, 200821, 2009 to shareholders on the register onas of May 19, 2008.18, 2009.

Legal reserve
This reserve represents earnings restricted from the payment of dividends pursuant to Article 2430 of the Italian Civil Code. The legal reserve has reached the maximum amount required by the Italian Law.

F-57F-62


Reserve for treasury shares
The reserve for treasury shares represents the reserve restricteddestined to the purchase of ownEni shares in accordance with the decisions ofreached at Eni’s Shareholders’ Meetings. The amount of euro 6,757 million (euro 7,187 million (euro 7,207 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) included treasury shares purchased. During the year 2009 the Company did not purchase its own shares and the term established by Eni’s Shareholders’ Meetings for the purchase has expired. The decreaseresidual amount of euro 20430 million primarily concerned the salewas taken to Retained earnings (euro 429 million) and grant of treasury shares to Group managers following stock option and stock grants incentive schemes.

Cumulative foreign currency translation differences
The cumulative foreign currency translation differences arose from the translation of financial statements denominated in currencies other than euro.

Other reserves
Other reserves of negative amount were euro 1,140 million (at December 31, 2007 other reserves of negative amount were euro 914(euro 1 million) and included:.

a reserve of euro 247 million constituted following the sale by Eni SpA of Snamprogetti SpA to Saipem Projects SpA (now Saipem SpA) (same amount at December 31, 2007);
a reserve of euro 194 million (euro 181 million at December 31, 2007) deriving from Eni SpA’s equity;
a reserve of euro 86 million (at December 31, 2007 a negative for euro 1,342 million) including the related tax, for the valuation at fair value of available-for-sale securities and cash flow hedge derivatives. Further information is given in Note 2 - Other financial assets held for trading or available for sale, Note 7 - Other current assets, Note 20 - Other current liabilities and Note 25 - Other non-current liabilities;
a negative reserve of euro 1,495 million related

Reserve referring to the put option granted to Publigaz (the Distrigas minority shareholder) to divest its 31.25% stake in Distrigas NV valued at the same per-share price of the ongoing mandatory tender offer to minorities.

The valuation at fair value of securities available for sale and cash flow hedgehedging derivatives and available-for-sale securities, net of the related tax effect,
The valuation of the fair value of cash flow hedging derivatives and available-for-sale securities, net of the related tax, consisted of the following:

  Available-for-sale securities Cash flow hedge derivatives Total
  
 
 
(euro million) 

Gross reserve

 

Deferred tax liabilities

 

Net reserve

 

Gross reserve

 

Deferred tax liabilities

 

Net reserve

 

Gross reserve

 

Deferred tax liabilities

 

Net reserve

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Reserve as of December 31, 2006 

8

 

(2

) 

6

 

1

   

1

 

9

 

(2

) 

7

 
Changes of the year 2007       

(2,237

) 

867

 

(1,370

) 

(2,237

) 

867

 

(1,370

)
Foreign currency translation differences       

51

 

(26

) 

25

 

51

 

(26

) 

25

 
Amount recognized in the profit and loss account 

(6

) 

2

 

(4

)       

(6

) 

2

 

(4

)
Reserve as of December 31, 2007 

2

   

2

 

(2,185

) 

841

 

(1,344

) 

(2,183

) 

841

 

(1,342

) 2   2 (2,185) 841 (1,344) (2,183) 841 (1,342)
Changes of the year 2008 

3

 

(1

) 

2

 

964

 

(364

) 

600

 

967

 

(365

) 

602

  3 (1) 2 964 (364) 600 967 (365) 602 
Changes in the scope of consolidation       

(68

) 

23

 

(45

) 

(68

) 

23

 

(45

)       (68) 23 (45) (68) 23 (45)
Foreign currency translation differences       

48

 

(23

) 

25

 

48

 

(23

) 

25

        48 (23) 25 48 (23) 25 
Amount recognized in the profit and loss account       

1,005

 

(402

) 

603

 

1,005

 

(402

) 

603

        1,005 (402) 603 1,005 (402) 603 
Reserve as of December 31, 2008 

5

 

(1

) 

4

 

(236

) 

75

 

(161

) 

(231

) 

74

 

(157

) 5 (1) 4 (236) 75 (161) (231) 74 (157)
of which: Eni Group 

5

 

(1

) 

4

 

(128

) 

38

 

(90

) 

(123

) 

37

 

(86

)
Of which: Eni Group 5 (1) 4 (128) 38 (90) (123) 37 (86)
Changes of the year 2009 1   1 (636) 246 (390) (635) 246 (389)
Foreign currency translation differences       3 (2) 1 3 (2) 1 
Amount recognized in the profit and loss account       155 (44) 111 155 (44) 111 
Reserve as of December 31, 2009 6 (1) 5 (714) 275 (439) (708) 274 (434)
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

F-58


The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of cash flow hedging derivatives (time value component) entered into by the Exploration & Production segment consisted of the following:

(euro million) 

Value at
Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Changes recognized in profit and loss account

 

Currency translation differences

 

Value at
Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
 
 
  

(5645

) 

76

 

41

 

(4538

)
  
 
 
 

Other reserves
Other reserves of negative amount were euro 1,492 million (as of December 31, 2008 other reserves of negative amount were euro 1,054 million) and included:

F-63


Cumulative foreign currency translation differences
The cumulative foreign currency translation differences arose from the translation of financial statements denominated in currencies other than euro.

Treasury shares purchased
A total of 382,954,240382,952,240 ordinary shares (348,525,005 at(382,954,240 as of December 31, 2007)2008) with a nominal value of euro 1 each, were held in treasury, for a total cost of euro 6,757 million (euro 5,999 million at(same amount as of December 31, 2007)2008). 23,557,425During the year 2009, the company has not purchased its own shares and the term established by Eni’s Shareholders’ Meetings for the purchase has expired. 19,482,330 treasury shares (35,423,925 at(23,557,425 as of December 31, 2007)2008) at a cost of euro 414 million (euro 505 million (euro 768 million atfor the year-ended December 31, 2007)2008) were available for 2002-2005 and 2006-2008 stock option plans.

The decrease of 11,866,5004,075,095 shares consisted of the following:

  

Stock option

Stock grant

Total

  

Number of shares at December 31, 2008
 
23,557,425
Rights exercised(2,000)
Rights cancelled(4,073,095)
(4,075,095)
Number of shares at December 31, 200919,482,330
Number of shares at December 31, 2007 

34,521,125

  

902,800

  

35,423,925

 
Rights not assigned for the 2006-2008 stock option plan 

(9,406,500

)    

(9,406,500

)
Rights exercised 

(582,100

) 

(893,400

) 

(1,475,500

)
Rights cancelled 

(975,100

) 

(9,400

) 

(984,500

)
  

(10,963,700

) 

(902,800

) 

(11,866,500

)
Number of shares at December 31, 2008 

23,557,425

     

23,557,425

 
  


AtAs of December 31, 2008,2009, options outstanding were 23,557,42519,482,330 shares. Options refer to the 2002 stock plan for 97,000 shares with an exercise price of euro 15.216 per share, to the 2003 stock plan for 231,900229,900 shares with an exercise price of euro 13.743 per share, to the 2004 stock plan for 671,600 shares with an exercise price of euro 16.576 per share, to the 2005 stock plan for 3,756,0003,281,500 shares with an exercise price of euro 22.512 per share, to the 2006 stock plan for 5,954,2503,018,155 shares with an weighted average exercise price of euro 23.119 per share, to the 2007 stock plan for 5,492,3755,144,050 with an weighted average exercise price of euro 27.451 per share and to the 2008 stock plan for 7,354,3007,040,125 with an weighted average exercise price of euro 22.540 per share.

Information about commitments related to stock grant and stock option plans is included in Note 31 -30 – Operating expenses.

Interim dividend
Interim
The interim dividend for the year 2008ended December 31, 2009 amounted of euro 2,3591,811 million corresponding to euro 0.650.50 per share, as decided by the Board of Directors on September 11, 200810, 2009 in accordance with Article 2433-bis, paragraph 5 of the Italian Civil Code; the dividend was paid on September 25, 2008.24, 2009.

Distributable reserves
At
Undistributed reserves considered to be reinvested indefinitely amounted to approximately euro 41,000 million as of December 31, 2008 Eni shareholders’ equity included distributable2009. The determination of the tax effect relating to such reinvested reserves for euro 39,000 million.is not practicable.

F-59F-64


Reconciliation of net profit and shareholders’ equity of the parent company Eni SpA to consolidated net profit and shareholders’ equity

    

Net profit

  

Shareholders’ equity

    
  
(euro million)  

2007

  

2008

  

Dec. 31, 2007

  

Dec. 31, 2008

    
  
  
  
As recorded in Eni SpA’s Financial Statements 

6,600

  

6,745

  

28,926

  

30,049

 
Difference between the equity value of individual accounts of consolidated subsidiaries with respect to the corresponding carrying amount in the statutory accounts of the parent company 

4,122

  

4,140

  

16,320

  

18,999

 
Consolidation adjustments:            
- difference between cost and underlying value of equity 

(1

) 

(330

) 

1,245

  

5,161

 
- elimination of tax adjustments and compliance with accounting policies 

649

  

(1,373

) 

(1,235

) 

(2,852

)
- elimination of unrealized intercompany profits 

(435

) 

216

  

(3,383

) 

(3,127

)
- deferred taxes 

(97

) 

159

  

711

  

(15

)
- other adjustments 

(29

) 

1

  

283

  

295

 
  

10,809

  

9,558

  

42,867

  

48,510

 
Minority interest 

(798

) 

(733

) 

(2,439

) 

(4,074

)
As recorded in Consolidated Financial Statements 

10,011

  

8,825

  

40,428

  

44,436

 
(euro million)  

2008

  

2009

  

Dec. 31, 2008

  

Dec. 31, 2009

    
  
  
  
As recorded in Eni SpA’s Financial Statements 6,745  5,061  30,049  32,144 
Difference between the equity value of individual accounts of consolidated subsidiaries with respect to the corresponding carrying amount in the statutory accounts of the parent company 4,140  158  18,999  17,464 
Consolidation adjustments:            
- difference between cost and underlying value of equity (330) (213) 5,161  5,068 
- elimination of tax adjustments and compliance with accounting policies (1,373) (113) (2,852) (1,062)
- elimination of unrealized intercompany profits 216  117  (3,127) (4,582)
- deferred taxation 159  378  (15) 1,175 
- other adjustments 1  (71) 295  (156)
  9,558  5,317  48,510  50,051 
Minority interest (733) (950) (4,074) (3,978)
As recorded in Consolidated Financial Statements 8,825  4,367  44,436  46,073 
  
 
 
 

 

2827 Other information

Acquisitions
Burren Energy Plc
On January 11, 2008, followingFebruary 4, 2010 Eni formally presented to the Directorate General for Competition of the European Commission a non-hostile takeover by meansset of structural remedies for the conclusion of a cash offer,legal proceeding related to some international gas pipelines.

The legal proceeding concerns the Statement of Objections that Eni acquired control overreceived from the British oil company Burren Energy Plc (Burren). Burren held producingEuropean Commission on March 9, 2009 which, under Article No. 82 of the EC Treaty and Article No. 54 of the SEE agreement, alleged that during the period 2000-2005, Eni was responsible for limiting the access of third parties to the gas pipelines TAG, TENP and Transitgas.

With prior agreement from its partners, Eni has committed to dispose of its interests in both the German Tenp gas pipeline and in Switzerland’s Transitgas pipeline which both transport gas from the sites in the North of Europe.

Given the strategic importance of the Austrian Tag pipeline, which transports gas from Russia to Italy, Eni has negotiated a solution with the Commission which calls for the transfer of its stake into an entity controlled by the Italian State. The remedies negotiated with the Commission do not affect Eni’s contractual gas transport rights.

The European Commission accepted commitments proposed by Eni and will implement a market test before adopting a decision under Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003.

Assets in hand refer to investments in Trans Austria Gasleitung GmbH (TAG), Trans Europa Naturgas Pipeline GmbH & Co KG (TENP) and Transitgas AG as well as assets and liabilities mainly referring to the marketing of the transportation capacity of the consolidated companies Eni Gas Transport Deutschland SpA and Eni Gas Transport International SA.

Considering the amounts as of December 31, 2009, the foreseen disposals concerns the investments accounted for using the equity method in the amount of euro 210 million, current assets in Turkmenistan and Congo, and exploratory licenses in Egypt, Yemen and India. Total consideration for this transactionthe amount of euro 2,358258 million, liabilities in the amount of euro 98 million of which euro 148 million related to additional costs directly attributable to the combination, has been allocated to assetsare non-current, and liabilities onGroup’s equity for a definitive basis.

Hindustan Oil Exploration Co Ltd (HOEC)
On August 5, 2008, following the execution of a mandatory tender offer on a 20% stake of the HOEC share capital, Eni acquired control over the Indian company Hindustan Oil Exploration Co Ltd (HOEC). The mandatory offer was associated with Eni’s acquisition of a 27.18% of HOEC as part of the Burren deal. Total consideration for this transactiontotal amount of euro 107 million, with the exclusion of the minority interest, has been allocated to assets and liabilities on a preliminary basis because of the significant amount of time required for a more precise valuation.160 million.

F-65


Main acquisitions

Distrigas NV
On October 30, 2008, following the acquisition of a 57.243% majority stake from the French company Suez-Tractebel, Eni acquired control over the Belgian company Distrigas NV. On December 30, 2008,March 19, 2009, Eni was granted authorization fromfinalized the Belgian market authorities to execute a mandatory tender offer toon the minorities of Distrigas. The deadlineShareholders, including Publigaz with its entire interest (31.25%), tendered shares representing 41.617% of the offershare capital of Distrigas. On May 4, 2009, the residual 1.14% of the share capital was March 19, 2009. Total considerationacquired by Eni through a squeeze-out procedure. At December 31, 2009 Eni owns 100% of share capital of Distrigas NV with the exception of a share with special rights owned by the Belgian State.

Consideration for this transactionthe acquisition of control amounted to euro 2,751 million, of which includes euro 12 million related to additional costs directly attributable to the acquisition, with the exclusionacquisition. The allocation of the cost, not including the minority interest, has been allocated to assets and liabilities was made on a preliminary basis becauseas of the amount of time required for a more precise valuation.

First Calgary Petroleums Ltd
On November 21,December 31, 2008, following the acquisition of all of the common shares Eni gained control of First Calgary Petroleums Ltd, a Canadian oil and gas company with exploration and development activities in Algeria. Total consideration for this transaction of euro 605 million, of which euro 5 million related to additional costs directly attributable to the acquisition, has been allocated to assets and liabilities on a preliminarydefinitive basis becauseas of the amount of time required for a more precise valuation.December 31, 2009.

F-60


Eni Hewett Ltd
On November 28, 2008, following the finalization of an agreement with the British company Tullow Oil Ltd Eni acquired a 52% stake and the operatorship of fields in the Hewett Unit and relevant facilities in the North Sea, with the aim to upgrade certain depleted fields in the area so as to achieve a gas storage facility. Total consideration for this transaction ofamounted to euro 224 million which was allocated to assets and liabilities on a preliminary basis as of December 31, 2008 and on a definitive basis as of December 31, 2009.

First Calgary Petroleums Ltd
On November 21, 2008, following the acquisition of all of the common shares Eni gained control of First Calgary Petroleums Ltd, a Canadian oil and gas company with exploration and development activities in Algeria. Total consideration for this transaction amounted to euro 605 million, of which euro 5 million related to additional costs directly attributable to the acquisition. The allocation of the cost to assets and liabilities was made on a preliminary basis as of December 31, 2008, and on a definitive basis as of December 31, 2009.

Hindustan Oil Exploration Co Ltd (HOEC)
On August 5, 2008, following the execution of a mandatory tender offer on a 20% stake of the HOEC share capital, Eni acquired control over the Indian company Hindustan Oil Exploration Co Ltd (HOEC). The mandatory tender offer was associated with Eni’s acquisition of 27.18% of HOEC as part of the Burren deal. Total consideration for this transaction in the amount of euro 107 million, not including the minority interest, has been allocated to assets and liabilities on a preliminary basis becauseas of December 31, 2008, and on a definitive basis as of December 31, 2009.

The definitive allocation of the amountcosts of time required for a more precise valuation.the business combinations made during the year ended December 31, 2008 year consisted of the following:

(euro million) 

Burren Energy PlcDistrigas NV (a)

 

Hindustan Oil Exploration CoEni Hewett Ltd

Distrigas NV

 

First Calgary Petroleums Ltd

 

Eni HewettHindustan Oil Exploration Co Ltd

 
 
 
 
 
  

Pre- acquisitionPreliminaryallocation atDec. 31,
2008

 

Post- acquisitionDefinitiveallocation

 

Pre- acquisitionPreliminaryallocation atDec. 31,
2008

 

Post- acquisitionDefinitiveallocation

 

Pre- acquisitionPreliminaryallocation atDec. 31,
2008

 

Post- acquisitionDefinitiveallocation

 

Pre- acquisitionPreliminaryallocation atDec. 31,
2008

 

Post- acquisition

Pre- acquisition

Post- acquisitionDefinitiveallocation

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Current assets 

187

 

187

 

115

 

115

 

3,375

 

3,375

 

148

 

148

 

56

 

19

 3,375 3,375 19 20 148 148 115 115
Property, plant and equipment 

457

 

2,543

 

79

 

199

 

30

 

30

 

643

 

757

 

29

 

118

 30 30 118 118 757 855 199 201
Intangible assets 

47

 

326

 

8

   

1

 

1,395

       

208

 1,395 1,390 208 217        
Goodwill   

89

       

1,245

   

88

   

39

 1,245 1,248 39 37 88 65    
Investments 

56

 

53

 

1

 

1

 

112

 

112

         112 112         1 1
Other non-current assets 

17

 

17

     

202

 

203

     

9

   203 203            
Assets acquired 

764

 

3,215

 

203

 

315

 

3,720

 

6,360

 

791

 

993

 

94

 

384

 6,360 6,358 384 392 993 1,068 315 317
Current liabilities 

62

 

100

 

37

 

37

 

1,796

 

1,796

 

45

 

45

 

17

 

17

 1,796 1,796 17 22 45 82 37 37
Net deferred tax liabilities 

36

 

733

 

(5

)

31

 

30

 

504

 

15

 

108

   

91

Deferred tax liabilities 504 502 91 94 108 147 31 33
Provisions for contingencies 

14

 

24

 

4

 

3

 

80

 

80

 

3

 

6

 

44

 

52

 80 80 52 52 6 5 3 3
Other non-current liabilities     

17

 

17

 

88

 

88

 

229

 

229

     88 88     229 229 17 17
Liabilities acquired 

112

 

857

 

53

 

88

 

1,994

 

2,468

 

292

 

388

 

61

 

160

 2,468 2,466 160 168 388 463 88 90
Minority interest     

79

 

120

 

748

 

1,141

         1,141 1,141         120 120
Eni’s shareholders equity 

652

 

2,358

 

71

 

107

 

978

 

2,751

 

499

 

605

 

33

 

224

Eni's shareholders equity 2,751 2,751 224 224 605 605 107 107
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(a)It does not include the share of goodwill attributable to minorities whose equity interest has been acquired during 2009.

 

F-66


2928 Guarantees, commitments and risks

Guarantees
Guarantees were as follows:

  

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 

(euro million)

 

Unsecured guarantees

 

Other
guarantees

 

Total

 

Unsecured guarantees

 

Other
guarantees

 

Total

  
 
 
 
 
 
Consolidated subsidiaries   

6,388

 

6,388

   

13,139

 

13,139

   13,139 13,139   9,863 9,863
Unconsolidated entities controlled by Eni   

150

 

150

   

151

 

151

   151 151   146 146
Joint ventures and associates 

5,896

 

1,099

 

6,995

 

6,027

 

1,075

 

7,102

 6,027 1,075 7,102 6,060 1,251 7,311
Others 

12

 

279

 

291

 

8

 

245

 

253

 8 245 253 5 266 271
 

5,908

 

7,916

 

13,824

 

6,035

 

14,610

 

20,645

 6,035 14,610 20,645 6,065 11,526 17,591
  
 
 
 
 
 

Other guarantees issued on behalf of consolidated subsidiaries in the amount of euro 9,863 million (euro 13,139 million (euro 6,388 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) primarily consisted of: (i) guarantees given to third parties relating to bid bonds and performance bonds forin the amount of euro 6,091 million (euro 7,004 million (euro 3,244 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008), of which euro 5,9654,936 million related to the Engineering & Construction segment (euro 2,3515,965 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008); (ii) VAT recoverable from tax authorities in the amount of euro 1,171 million (euro 1,248 million as of December 31, 2008); (iii) insurance risk in the amount of euro 253 million reinsured by Eni (euro 257 million as of December 31, 2008). During 2009, guarantees for euro 2,739 million expired. These guarantees were issued on behalf of Eni Gas & Power Belgium SA for euro 2,739 million related to the Share Purchase Agreement with Suez-Tractebel SA for the acquisition of a 57.24% majority stake in Distrigas NV; (iii) VAT recoverable from tax authorities for euro 1,248 million (euro 1,286 million atNV. As of December 31, 2007); and (iv) insurance risk for euro 257 million reinsured by Eni (euro 259 million at December 31, 2007). At December 31, 20072009 the underlying commitment covered by such guarantees was euro 9,783 million (euro 10,202 million (euro 6,050 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008).

Other guarantees issued on behalf of unconsolidated subsidiaries in the amount of euro 146 million (euro 151 million (euro 150 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) consisted of letters of patronage and other guarantees issued to commissioning entities relating to bid bonds and performance bonds forin the amount of euro 141 million (euro 146 million (euro 144 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008). AtAs of December 31, 2008,2009, the underlying commitment covered by such guarantees was euro 64 million (euro 79 million (euro 19 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008).

Unsecured guarantees and other guarantees issued on behalf of joint ventures and associates in the amount of euro 7,311 million (euro 7,102 million (euro 6,995 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) primarily concerned:consisted of: (i) an unsecured guarantee in the amount of euro 6,037 million (euro 6,001 million (euro 5,870 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) given by Eni SpA to Treno Alta Velocità - TAV - SpA for the proper and timely completion of a project relating to the Milan-Bologna train link by CEPAV (Consorzio Eni per

F-61


l’Alta Velocità) Uno; consortium members, excluding unconsolidated entities controlled by Eni, gave Eni liability of surety letters and bank guarantees amounting to 10% of their respective portion of the work; (ii) unsecured guarantees, letters of patronage and other guarantees given to banks in relation to loans and lines of credit received forin the amount of euro 971 million (euro 871 million (euro 824 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008), of which euro 716692 million related to a contract released by SnamEni SpA (now merged into Eni SpA) on behalf of Blue Stream Pipeline Co BV (Eni 50%) to a consortium of international financial institutions (euro 677716 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008); and (iii) unsecured guarantees and other guarantees given to commissioning entities relating to bid bonds and performance bonds forin the amount of euro 126 million (euro 107 million (euro 119 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008). AtAs of December 31, 2008,2009, the underlying commitment covered by such guarantees was euro 814 million (euro 983 million (euro 1,562 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008).

Unsecured and other guarantees given on behalf of third parties in the amount of euro 271 million (euro 253 million (euro 291 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) consisted primarily of: (i) guarantees issued on behalf of Gulf LNG Energy and Gulf LNG Pipeline and on behalf of Angola LNG Supply Service Llc (Eni 13.6%) as security against payment commitments offor fees in connection with the re-gasification activity foractivity. The expected commitment has been valued at euro 216206 million (euro 204223 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) and it is included in the off-balance sheet commitments in the following paragraph "Liquidity risk"; and (ii) guarantees issued by Eni SpA to banks and other financial institutions in relation to loans and lines of credit forin the amount of euro 1923 million on behalf of minor investments or companies sold (euro 2019 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008).

AtAs of December 31, 20082009 the underlying commitment covered by such guarantees was euro 266 million (euro 232 million (euro 281 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008).

F-67


Commitments and contingencies
Commitments and contingencies were as follows:

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20072008

 

Dec. 31, 20082009

  
 
Commitments 200 205 
Risks 1,520 1,660 
  1,720 1,865 


Commitments 13,382 16,668
Risks 1,660 1,277
  15,042 17,945
  
 

Other commitments in the amount of euro 20516,668 million (euro 20013,382 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) mainly related to: (i) parent company guarantees that were essentially relatedissued in connection with certain contractual commitments for hydrocarbon exploration and production activities that was quantified on the basis of the capital expenditures expected to be incurred which is euro 10,302 million (euro 10,585 million as of December 31, 2008); (ii) a commitment entered into by Eni USA Gas Marketing Llc on behalf of Angola LNG Supply Service for the acquisition of regasified gas at the Pascagoula plant (USA) that will come into force when the regasification service starts during the period between 2011-2032. The expected commitment has been valued at euro 3,941 million and it is included in the off-balance sheet commitments in the following paragraph "Liquidity risk"; (iii) a commitment entered into by Eni USA Gas Marketing Llc on behalf of Gulf LNG Energy for the acquisition of regasification capacity of Pescagoula’s terminal (6 BCM/y) over a twenty-year period (2011-2031). The expected commitment has been valued at euro 1,151 million (euro 1,247 million as of December 31, 2008) and it is included in the off-balance sheet commitments in the following paragraph "Liquidity risk"; (iv) a commitment entered into by Eni USA Gas Marketing Llc on behalf of Cameron Llc for the acquisition of regasification capacity at the Cameron plant (USA) (5.7 BCM/y) over a twenty-year period (until 2029). The expected commitment has been valued at euro 990 million (euro 1,222 million as of December 31, 2008) and it is included in the off-balance sheet commitments in the following paragraph "Liquidity risk"; (v) a memorandum of intent signed with the Basilicata Region, whereby Eni has agreed to invest euro 180150 million in the future, also on account of Shell Italia E&P SpA, in connection with Eni’s development plan of oil fields in Val d’Agri (euro 177180 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008). The commitment is included in the off-balance sheet commitments in the following paragraph "Liquidity risk"; (vi) a commitment entered into by Eni USA Gas Marketing Llc for the contract of gas transportation from the Cameron plant (USA) to the American network. The expected commitment has been valued at euro 110 million (euro 123 million as of December 31, 2008) and it is included in the off-balance sheet commitments in the following paragraph "Liquidity risk".

Risks in the amount of euro 1,277 million (euro 1,660 million (euro 1,520 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) primarily concernedrelate to potential risks associated with the value of assets of third parties under the custody of Eni forin the amount of euro 899 million (euro 1,273 million (euro 1,126 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008) and contractual assurances given to acquirers of certain investments and businesses of Eni forin the amount of euro 378 million (euro 387 million (euro 376 million atas of December 31, 2007)2008).

Non-quantifiable commitments
Under the convention signed on October 15, 1991 by Treno Alta Velocità - TAV SpA and CEPAV (Consorzio Eni per l’Alta Velocità) Due, Eni committed to guarantee the execution of design and construction of the works assigned to the CEPAV Consortium (to which it is party) and guaranteed to TAV the correct and timely execution of all obligations indicated in the convention in a subsequent integration deed and in any further addendum or change or integration to the same. The regulation of CEPAV Consortium contains the same obligations and guarantees contained in the CEPAV Uno Agreement.

Eni is liable for certain non-quantifiable risks related to contractual assurances given to acquirers of certain of Eni’s assets, including businesses and investments, against certain contingent liabilities deriving from tax, social security contributions, environmental issues and other matters applicable to periods during which such assets were operated by Eni. Eni believes such matters will not have a material adverse effect on Eni’s results of operations and liquidity.

Risk factors

FOREWORD
The main risks that the Company is facing and actively monitoring and managing are the following: (i) the market risk derivingderived from exposure to fluctuations in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices; (ii) the credit risk derivingderived from the possible default of a counterparty; (iii) the liquidity risk derivingderived from the risk that

F-68


suitable sources of funding for the Group’s operations may not be available; (iv) the country risk in the upstream business; (v) the operational risk; (vi) the possible evolution of the Italian gas market; and (vii) the specific risks derivingderived from exploration and production activities.

Financial risks are managed in respect of guidelines defined by the parent company, targeting to align and coordinate Group companies’companies policies on financial risks.

Market risk

Market risk is the possibility that changes in currency exchange rates, interest rates or commodity prices will adversely affect the value of the Group’s financial assets, liabilities or expected future cash flows. The Company actively manages market risk in accordance with a set of policies and guidelines that provide a centralized model of conducting finance, treasury and risk management operations based on three separate entities: the parent company’s (Eni SpA) finance department, Eni Coordination Center and Banque Eni which is subject to certain bank regulatory

F-62


restrictions preventing the Group’s exposure to concentrations of credit risk. Additionally, in 2007,risk and Eni Trading & Shipping was established andthat has the mandate to manage and solely monitor solely commodity derivative contracts. In particular, Eni SpA and Eni Coordination Center manage subsidiaries’ financing requirements ininside and outside of Italy, respectively, covering funding requirements and using available surpluses. All transactions concerning currencies and derivative financial contracts are managed by the parent company as well as the activity of trading certificates according to the European Union Emission Trading Scheme. The commodity risk is managed by each business unit with Eni Trading & Shipping ensuring the negotiation of hedging derivatives. Eni uses derivative financial instruments (derivatives) in order to minimize exposure to market risks related to changes in exchange rates and interest rates and to manage exposure to commodity prices fluctuations. Eni does not enter into derivative transactions on a speculative basis. The framework defined by Eni’s policies and guidelines prescribes that measurement and control of market risk be performed on the basis of maximum tolerable levels of risk exposure defined in accordance with value-at-risk techniques. These techniques make a statistical assessment of the market risk on the Group’s activity, i.e., potential gain or loss in fair values, due to changes in market conditions taking into account of the correlation existingthat exists among changes in fair value of existing instruments. Eni’s finance departments define maximum tolerable levels of risk exposure to changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, pooling Group companies risk positions. Eni’s calculation and measurement techniques for interest rate and foreign currency exchange rate risks are in accordance with established banking standards, as established by the Basel Committee for bank activities surveillance. Tolerable levels of risk are based on a conservative approach, considering the industrial nature of the company. Eni’s guidelines prescribe that Eni’sEni Group companies minimize such kinds of market risks. With regard to the commodity risk, Eni’s policies and guidelines define rules to manage this risk aiming at the optimization of core activities and the pursuingpursuit of preset targets of industrial margins. The maximum tolerable level of risk exposure is pre-defined in terms of value at riskvalue-at-risk in connection with trading and commercial activities, while the strategic risk exposure to commodity prices fluctuations – i.e. the impact on the Group’s business results deriving from changes in commodity prices – is monitored in terms of value-at risk,value-at-risk, albeit not hedged in a systematic way. Accordingly, Eni evaluates the opportunity to mitigate its commodity risk exposure by entering into hedging transactions in view of certain acquisition deals of oil and gas reserves as part of the Group’s strategy to achieve its growth targets or ordinary asset portfolio management. The Group controls commodity risk with a maximum value-at-risk limit awarded to each business unit. Hedging needs from business units are pooled by Eni Trading & Shipping which also manages its own risk exposure. The three different market risks, whose management and control have been summarized above, are described below.

Exchange rate risk

Exchange rate risk derives from the fact that Eni’s operations are conducted in currencies other than the euro (mainly in the U.S. dollar). Revenues and expenses denominated in foreign currencies may be significantly affected by exchange rates fluctuations due to conversion differences on single transactiontransactions arising from the time lag existing between execution and definition of relevant contractual terms (economic risk) and conversion of foreign currency-denominated trade and financing payables and receivables (transactional risk). Exchange rate fluctuations affect the Group’s reported results and net equity as financial statements of subsidiaries denominated in currencies other than the euro are translated from their functional currency into euro (translation risk). Generally, an appreciation of the U.S. dollar versus the euro has a positive impact on Eni’s results of operations, and vice versa. Eni’s foreign exchange risk management policy is to minimize economic and transactional exposures arising from foreign currency movements. Eni does not undertake any hedging activity for risks deriving from the translation of foreign currency denominated profits or assets and liabilities of subsidiaries which prepare financial statements in a currency other than the euro, except for single transactions to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Effective management of exchange rate risk is performed within Eni’s central finance departments which match opposite positions within Group companies, hedging the GroupGroup's net exposure through the use of certain derivatives, such as currency swaps, forwards and options. Such derivatives are evaluated at fair value on the basis of market prices provided by specialized sources. Changes in fair value of those derivatives are normally recognized through the profit and loss account as they do not meet the formal criteria to be recognized as hedges in accordance with IAS 39. The VAR techniques are based on variance/covariance simulation models and are used to monitor the risk exposure

F-69


arising from possible future changes in market values over a 24-hour period within a 99% confidence level and a 20-day holding period.


Interest rate risk

Changes in interest rates affect the market value of financial assets and liabilities of the company and the level of finance charges. Eni’s interest rate risk management policy is to minimize risk with the aim to achieve financial structure objectives defined and approved in the management’s finance plans. Borrowing requirements of the Group’s companies are pooled by the Group’s central finance department in order to manage net positions and the funding of portfolio developments consistently with management’s plans while maintaining a level of risk exposure within prescribed limits. Eni enters into interest rate derivative transactions, in particular interest rate swaps, to effectively manage the balance between fixed and floating rate debt.

F-63


Such derivatives are evaluatedvalued at fair value on the basis of market prices provided from specialized sources. Changes in fair value of those derivatives are normally recognized through the profit and loss account as they do not meet the formal criteria to be accounted for under the hedge accounting method in accordance with IAS 39. Value at risk deriving from interest rate exposure is measured daily on the basis of a variance/covariance model, with a 99% confidence level and a 20-day holding period.

Commodity risk

Eni’s results of operations are affected by changes in the prices of commodities. A decrease in oil and gas prices generally has a negative impact on Eni’s results of operations and vice-versa. Eni manages exposure to commodity price risk arising in normal trading and commercial activities in view of achieving stable margins. In order to accomplish this, Eni uses derivatives traded on the organized markets of ICE and NyMExNYMEX (futures) and derivatives traded over the counter (swaps, forward, contracts for differences and options) with the underlying commodities being crude oil, refined products or electricity. Such derivatives are evaluatedvalued at fair value on the basis of market prices provided from specialized sources or, absent market prices, on the basis of estimates provided by brokers or suitable evaluation techniques. Changes in fair value of those derivatives are normally recognized through the profit and loss account as they do not meet the formal criteria to be recognized as hedges in accordance with IAS 39. Value at risk derivingValue-at-risk derived from commodity exposure is measured daily on the basis of a historical simulation technique, with a 95% confidence level and a one-day holding period. The following table shows amounts in terms of value at risk,value-at-risk, recorded in the first half of 20082009 (compared with full year 2007)2008) relating to interest rate and exchange rate risks in the first section, and commodity risk in the second section. VAR values are stated in U.S. dollars, the currency used in oil products markets.

(Interest and exchange rate - Value at risk - parametric method variance/covariance; holding period: 20 days; confidence level: 99%)

 

2007

 

2008

 
 
  2008 2009
  
 
(euro million) 

High

Low

Avg

Average

At year end

High

Low

Avg

Average

At year end









Interest rate 

7.36

 

0.47

 

1.39

 

4.35

 

12.31

 

0.73

 

4.17

 

6.54

 12.31 0.73 4.17 6.54 6.85 1.65 3.35 1.98
Exchange rate 

1.25

 

0.03

 

0.21

 

0.43

 

1.48

 

0.09

 

0.48

 

0.47

 1.48 0.09 0.48 0.47 1.22 0.07 0.35 0.31
  
 






(Commodity risk - Value at risk - - historic simulation method; holding period: 1 day; confidence level: 95%)

 

2007

 

2008

 
 
  2008 2009
  
 
(U.S. $ million) 

High

Low

Avg

Average

At year end

High

Low

Avg

Average

At year end









Area oil, products 

44.59

 

4.39

 

20.17

 

12.68

 

46.48

 

3.44

 

19.88

 

5.43

 46.48 3.44 19.88 5.43 37.51 4.74 17.65 6.64
Area Gas & Power (*) 

54.11

 

20.12

 

34.56

 

25.57

 

67.04

 

24.38

 

43.53

 

32.07

 67.04 24.38 43.53 32.07 51.62 28.01 40.97 38.26
 





 
 
      
(*)  Amounts relating to the Gas & Power business also include the results of Distrigas NV forstarting from the months of November and December 2008 based on the closing date of acquisition.acquisition date.

Credit risk

Credit risk is the potential exposure of the Group to losses in case counterparties fail to perform or pay amounts due. The Group manages differently credit risk differently depending on whether credit risk arises from exposure to financial counterparties or to customers relating to outstanding receivables. Individual business units are responsible for managing credit risk arising in the normal course of the business. The Group has established formal credit systems and processes to ensure that before trading with a new counterpart can start, its creditworthiness is assessed. Also credit litigation and receivable collection activities are assessed. The monitoring activity of credit risk exposure is performed at the Group level according to set guidelines and measurement techniques that establish counterparty limits and systems to monitor exposure against limits and report regularly on those exposures. Specifically, credit risk exposure to multi-business clients and exposures higher than the limit set at euro 4 million are closely monitored. Monitoring activities do not include retail clients and public administrations. The assessment

F-70


methodology assigns a score to individual clients based on publicly available financial data and capital, profitability and liquidity ratios. Based on those scores, an internal credit rating is assigned to each counterparty that isand accordingly allocated to its proper risk category. The Group risk categories are comparable to those prepared by the main rating agencies onin the marketplace. The Group’s internal ratings are also benchmarked against ratings prepared by a specialized external source.

With regard to risk arising from financial counterparties, Eni has established guidelines prior to entering into cash management and derivative contracts to assess the counterparty’s financial soundness and rating in view of optimizing the risk profile of financial activities while pursuing operational targets. Maximum limits of risk exposure are set in terms of maximum amounts of credit exposures for categories of counterparties as defined by the

F-64


Company’s Board of Directors taking into accountsaccount the credit ratings provided by the primary credit rating agencies onin the marketplace. Credit risk arising from financial counterparties is managed by the Group central finance departments, including Eni’s subsidiary Eni Trading & Shipping which specifically engages in commodity derivatives transactions. Those are the sole Group entities entitled to be party to financial transactions due to the Group centralized finance model. Eligible financial counterparties are closely monitored to check exposures against limits assigned to each counterparty on a daily basis. Exceptional market conditions have forced the Group to adopt contingency plans and under certain circumstances to suspend eligibility to be a Group financial counterparty. Actions implemented also have been intended to limit concentrations of credit risk by maximizing counterparty diversification and turnover. Counterparties have also been also selected on more stringent criteria particularly in transactions on derivatives instruments and with maturity longer than a three-month period. Eni has not experienced material non-performance by any counterparty.See Note 3 for a disclosure of Eni’s allowance against doubtful accounts for year. As of December 31, 2007 and 2008,2009, Eni had nodid non have a significant concentrationsconcentration of credit risk.

Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that suitable sources of funding for the Group may not be available, or the Group is unable to sell its assets onin the market place as to be unable to meet short-term finance requirements and to settle obligations. Such a situation would negatively impact the Group results as it would result in the Company incurring higher borrowing expenses to meet its obligations or under the worst of conditions the inability of the Company to continue as a going concern. As part of its financial planning process, Eni manages the liquidity risk by targeting such a capital structure as to allow the Company to maintain a level of liquidity adequate to the Group’s needs optimizing the opportunity cost of maintaining liquidity reserves also achieving an efficient balance in terms of maturity and composition of finance debt. The GroupGroup’s capital structure is set according to the Company’s industrial targets and within the limits established by the Company’s Board of Directors who are responsible for prescribing the maximum ratio of debt to total equity and minimum ratio of medium and long-termlong term debt to total debt as well as fixed rate medium and long-termlong term debt to total medium and long-termlong term debt. In spite of ongoing tough credit market conditions resulting in higher spreads to borrowers, the Company has succeeded in maintaining access to a wide range of funding at competitive rates through the capital markets and banks. The actions implemented as part of Eni’s financial planning have enabled the Group to maintain access to the credit market particularly via the issueissuance of commercial paper also targeting to increase the flexibility of funding facilities. In particular in 2009, Eni issued bonds addressed to institutional investors and to the retail market in the amount of euro 3 billion and euro 2 billion, respectively. The above mentioned actions aimed at ensuring availability of suitable sources of funding to fulfill short-termshort term commitments and obligations due obligations alsowhile preserving the necessary financial flexibility to support the Group’s development plans. In doing so, the Group has pursued an efficient balance of finance debt in terms of maturity and composition leveraging on the structure of its lines of credit particularly the committed ones.

At present, the Group believes it has access to sufficient funding and has also both committed and uncommitted borrowing facilities to meet currently foreseeable borrowing requirements.

As of December 31, 2008,2009, Eni maintained short-termshort term committed and uncommitted unused borrowing facilities in the amount of euro 11,09911,774 million, of which euro 3,3132,241 million were committed, and long-termlong term committed unused borrowing facilities ofamounted to euro 1,8502,850 million.

These facilities were under interest rates that reflected market conditions. Fees charged for unused facilities were not significant.

Eni has a program in place a program for the issuance of Euro Medium Term Notes up to euro 1015 billion, of which euro 6,3919,211 million were drawn as of the balance sheet date.December 31, 2009.

The Group has debt ratings of AA- and A-1+ respectively for the long and short-term debt assigned by Standard & Poor’s and Aa2 and P-1 assigned by Moody’s; theMoody’s respectively for long and short-term debt. The outlook is stable for both.negative in both ratings.

The tables below summarize the Groupmaturities of the Group’s main contractual obligations for finance debt repayments, including expected payments for interest charges, and trade and other payables maturities.payables.

F-71


Finance debt

    

Maturity year

  
(euro million)  

2009

  

2010

  

2011

  

2012

  

2013

  

2014 and thereafter

  

Total

   
  
  
  
  
  
  
Non current debt 

549

 

3,630

 

797

 

2,687

 

1,981

 

4,834

 

14,478

Current financial liabilities 

6,359

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

6,359

  

6,908

 

3,630

 

797

 

2,687

 

1,981

 

4,834

 

20,837

Interest on finance debt 

502

 

469

 

412

 

383

 

336

 

791

 

2,893

(euro million)  

2010

  

2011

  

2012

  

2013

  

2014

  

2015 and thereafter

  

Total

   
  
  
  
  
  
  
Non current debt 3,191 1,342 3,660 1,967 2,487 8,608 21,255
Current financial liabilities 3,545           3,545
Fair value of derivative instruments 1,371 517 133 46 14 98 2,179
  8,107 1,859 3,793 2,013 2,501 8,706 26,979
Interest on finance debt 654 570 545 510 426 1,159 3,864
Guarantees to banks 377           377
   
  
  
  
  
  
  

F-65


Trade and other payables

    

Maturity year

    
(euro million)  

20092010

  

2010-20132011-2014

  

20142015 and thereafter

  

Total

    
  
  
  
Trade payables 

12,590

 

-

 

-

 

12,590

 10,078     10,078
Advances, other payables 

7,925

 

28

 

27

 

7,980

 9,096 31 23 9,150
 

20,515

 

28

 

27

 

20,570

 19,174 31 23 19,228
  
 
 
 

In addition to finance debt and trade payables presented in the financial statements, the Group has in place a number of contractual obligations arising in the normal course of the business. To meet these commitments, the Group will have to make payments to third parties. The Company’s main obligations are certain arrangements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms. Such arrangements include non-cancelable, long-term contractual obligations to secure access to supply and transport of natural gas, which include take-or-pay clauses whereby the CompanyCompany's obligations consist of off-taking minimum quantities of product or service or paying the corresponding cash amount that entitles the Company to off-take the product in future years. Future obligations in connection with these contracts were calculated by applying the forecasted prices of energy or services included in the four-year business plan approved by the Company’s Board of Directors and on the basis of the long-term market scenarios used by Eni for planning purposes to minimum take and minimum ship quantities.

The table below summarizes the Group principal contractual obligations as of the balance sheet date, shown on an undiscounted basis.

F-72


Expected payments by period under contractual obligations and commercial commitments

  

Maturity year

  
(euro million)  

2009

  

2010

  

2011

  

2012

  

2013

  

2014 and thereafter

  

Total

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating lease obligations (1) 

618

 

1,025

 

697

 

468

 

395

 

1,084

 

4,287

Decommissioning liabilities (2) 

269

 

35

 

61

 

18

 

256

 

8,830

 

9,469

Environmental liabilities 

396

 

421

 

284

 

223

 

221

 

443

 

1,988

Purchase obligations (3) 

17,938

 

13,777

 

14,326

 

14,405

 

14,112

 

185,415

 

259,973

Gas              
- Natural gas to be purchased in connection with take-or-pay contracts 

15,694

 

13,041

 

13,574

 

13,610

 

13,343

 

179,067

 

248,329

- Natural gas to be transported in connection with ship-or-pay contracts 

539

 

537

 

545

 

549

 

528

 

3,151

 

5,849

Other take-or-pay and ship-or-pay obligations 

139

 

135

 

126

 

111

 

106

 

838

 

1,455

Other purchase obligations (4) 

1,566

 

64

 

81

 

135

 

135

 

2,359

 

4,340

Other obligations 

8

 

5

 

5

 

5

 

5

 

152

 

180

of which:              
- Memorandum of intent relating Val d’Agri 

8

 

5

 

5

 

5

 

5

 

152

 

180

  

19,229

 

15,263

 

15,373

 

15,119

 

14,989

 

195,924

 

275,897

(euro million) 

2010

  

2011

  

2012

  

2013

  

2014

  

2015 and thereafter

  

Total

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating lease obligations (1) 886 889 561 470 415 1,034 4,255
Decommissioning liabilities (2) 79 55 112 161 1,640 9,280 11,327
Environmental liabilities 293 259 257 214 193 687 1,903
Purchase obligations (3) 14,845 14,151 13,923 14,634 14,651 175,888 248,092
Gas              
- Natural gas to be purchased in connection with take-or-pay contracts (4) 13,986 13,365 13,123 13,827 13,838 169,268 237,407
- Natural gas to be transported in connection with ship-or-pay contracts (4) 546 538 545 559 567 3,658 6,413
Other take-or-pay and ship-or-pay obligations 162 154 139 133 131 1,068 1,787
Other purchase obligations (5) 151 94 116 115 115 1,894 2,485
Other obligations (6) 21 4 3 3 3 152 186
of which:              
- Memorandum of intent relating Val d’Agri 21 4 3 3 3 152 186
  16,124 15,358 14,856 15,482 16,902 187,041 265,763
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
(1)  Operating leases primarily regarded assets for drilling activities, time charter and long-termlong term rentals of vessels, lands, service stations and office buildings. Such leases did not include renewal options. There are no significant restrictions provided by these operating leases which limit the ability of the Company to pay dividend, use assets or to take on new borrowings.
(2)  Represents the estimated future costs for the decommissioning of oil and natural gas production facilities at the end of the producing lives of fields, well-plugging, abandonment and site restoration.
(3)  Represents any agreement to purchase goods or services that is enforceable and legally binding and that specifies all significant terms.
(4)  Such arrangements include non-cancellable, long-term contractual obligations to secure access to supply and transport of natural gas, which include take-or-pay clauses whereby the Company obligations consist of off-taking minimum quantities of product or service or paying the corresponding cash amount that entitles the Company to off-take the product in future years. Future obligations in connection with these contracts were calculated by applying the forecasted prices of energy or services included in the four-year business plan approved by the Company’s Board of Directors and on the basis of the long-term market scenarios used by Eni for planning purposes to minimum take and minimum ship quantities. See "Item 4 – Gas & Power – Natural Gas Purchases" and "Item 3 – Risk Factors – Liberalization of the Italian Natural Gas Market" for a discussion of nature and importance of Eni’s take-or-pay contracts and the related risks from the evolving regulatory environment that could negatively impact Eni’s results.
(5)Mainly refers to arrangements to purchase capacity entitlements at certain re-gasification facilities in the U.S.
(6)In addition to these amounts, Eni has certain obligations that are not contractually fixed as to timing and amount, including contributions to defined benefit pension plans (see Note 22 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

F-66Over the next four-year period, Eni plans to invest euro 52.8 billion.


The table below summarizes Eni’s capital expenditure commitments for property, plant and equipment and capital projects atas of December 31, 2008.2009. Capital expenditures are considered to be committed when the project has received the appropriate level of internal management approval.approval and for which, usually, procurements have been arranged or set. Such costs are included in the amounts shown.

Capital expenditure commitments

  

Maturity year

  
(euro million)  

2009

  

2010

  

2011

  

2012

  

2013 and subsequent years

  

Total

  
 
 
 
 
 
Committed on major projects 

4,938

 

3,831

 

2,697

 

1,837

 

9,856

 

23,159

Other committed projects 

5,147

 

4,342

 

3,186

 

2,389

 

9,846

 

24,910

  

10,085

 

8,173

 

5,883

 

4,226

 

19,702

 

48,069

(euro million) 

2010

 

2011

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014 and thereafter

 

Total

  
 
 
 
 
 
Committed on major projects 4,119 3,793 2,829 1,928 11,357 24,026
Other committed projects 9,330 5,284 3,467 3,640 7,489 29,210
  13,449 9,077 6,296 5,568 18,846 53,236
  
 
 
 
 
 

Country risk

Substantial portions of Eni’s hydrocarbons reserves are located in countries outside the EU and North America, certain of which may be politically or economically less stable than the EU or North American. AtAs of December 31, 2007,2009, approximately 70%80% of Eni’s proved hydrocarbons reserves were located in such countries. Similarly, a substantial portion of Eni’s natural gas supplies comes from countries outside the EU and North America. In 2007,2009, approximately 60% of Eni’s domestic supply of natural gas came from such countries. Developments in the political framework, economic crisis, and social unrest can compromise temporarily or permanently Eni’s ability to operate or to economically operate in such countries, and to have access to oil and gas reserves. Further risks related to the activity undertakenassociated with

F-73


activities in thesethose countries are represented by: (i) lack of well established and reliable legal systems and uncertainties surrounding enforcement of contractual rights; (ii) unfavorable developments in laws and regulations leading to expropriation of Eni’s titles and mineral assets, changes in unilateral contractual clauses reducing the value of Eni’s assets; (iii) restrictions on exploration, production, imports and exports; (iv) tax or royalty increases; and (v) civil and social unrest leading to sabotages, acts of violence and incidents. While the occurrence of these events is unpredictable, it is possible that they can have a material adverse impact on Eni’s financial condition and results of operations. Eni periodically monitors political, social and economic risks of approximately 60 countries where it has invested, or, with regard to upstream projects evaluation, where Eni is planning to invest in order to assess returns of single projects based also on the evaluation of each country’s risk profile. Country risk is mitigated in accordance with guidelines on risk management defined in the procedure "Project risk assessment and management". In the most recent years, unfavorable developments in the regulatory framework, mainly regarding tax issues, have been implemented or announced also in EU countries and in North America.

Operational risk
Eni’s business activities conducted in and outside of Italy are subject to a broad range of laws and regulations, including specific rules concerning oil and gas activities currently in force in countries in which it operates. In particular, those laws and regulations require the acquisition of a license before exploratory drilling may commence and compliance with health, safety and environment standards. Environmental laws impose restrictions on the types, quantities and concentration of various substances that can be released into the environment and on discharges to surface and subsurface water. In particular Eni is required to follow strict operating practices and standards to protect biodiversity when exploring for, drilling and producing oil and gas in certain ecologically sensitive locations (protected areas). Breach of environmental, health and safety laws exposes employees to criminal and civil liability and in the case of violation of certain rules regarding safety onin the workplace also companies can be liable as provided for by a general EU rule on businesses liability due to negligent or willful conduct on part of their employees as adopted in Italy with Law Decree No. 231/2001.

Environmental, health and safety laws and regulations have a substantial impact on Eni’s operations and expenses and liabilities that Eni may incur in relation to compliance with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations are expected to remain material to the group’s results of operations or financial position in future years. Recently enacted regulation ofregulations on safety and health ofin the workplace in Italy will(Legislative Decree No. 81/2008 and Legislative Decree No. 106/2009) impose a new array of obligations to the CompanyCompany's operations, particularly regarding contractors. New regulationregulations prescribe that a company adopts certified operational and organizational systems whereby the Company can discharge possible liabilities due to a violation of health and security standards on condition that adopted operational systems and processes worked properly and were effective.

Eni has adopted guidelines for assessing and managing health, safety and environmental (HSE) risks, with the objective of protecting Eni’s employees, the populations involved in its activity, contractors and clients, and the environment and being in compliance with local and international rules and regulations. Eni’s guidelines prescribe the adoption of international best practices in setting internal principles, standards and solutions. The ongoing process for identifying, evaluating and managing HSE operations in each phase of the business activity and is performed through the adoption of procedures and effective pollution management systems tailored onto the

F-67


peculiarities of each business and industrial site and on steady enhancement of plants and process. Additionally, coding activities and procedures on operating phases allow to reduce the human component in the plant risk management. Operating emergencies that may have an adverse impact on the assets, people and the environment are managed by the business units for each site. These units manage the HSE risk throughin a systematic way that involves having emergency response plans in place with a number of corrective actions to be taken that minimize damage in the event of an incident. In the case of a major crisis, Divisions/Entities are assisted by the Eni Unit of CrisesCrisis to deal with the emergency through a team which has the necessary training and skills to coordinate in a timely and efficient manner resources and facilities.

The integrated management system of health, safety and environmental matters is supported by the adoption of Eni’s Model of HSE operations in all the DivisionsDivision and companies of the Eni Group. This is a procedure based on an annual cycle of planning, implementation, control, review of results and definition of new objectives. The model is directed towards the prevention of risks, the systematic monitoring and control of HSE performance, in a continuous improvement cycle also subject to audits by internal(Deming cycle).

Eni is reaching the goal of total certification of its plants. Industrial and independent experts. Major refiningcommercial sites of the R&M segment have been certified as ISO 14001, and six of them are EMAS certified; in the petrochemical segment facilities of Eni are certified under ISO 14001, EMAS and OHSAS 18001. EniPower power stations are EMAS certified, while in other segments facilities are mainly certified under ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001.

The system for monitoring HSE operational risks is based on the monitoring of HSE indicators at quarterly intervals and on an audit plan addressed to international environmental standards, such as ISO14001, OHSAS 18001three levels: HSE Corporate, HSE business unit and EMAS. at site level consisting of:

F-74


Eni provides a program of specific training and development forto its HSE staff in order to:
(i)

Risk factors related to the natural gas market

Possible evolutionRisks and uncertainties associated with the current outlook for gas demand and supply in Europe and Italy
In 2009 European gas demand was severely impacted by the economic downturn (down 7.4% from 2008, assuming normal average temperatures). As a result of that trend, both producing activities and request for electricity reduced. The Italian market was particularly hit by the downturn as demand fell by approximately 9 BCM from 2008, down 10%, and almost 10 BCM from the pre-crisis levels seen in 2007, down 12%, assuming normal average temperatures. In the meantime, new gas supplies entered the market as several operators, including Eni, completed plans to upgrade gas import pipelines from gas producing Countries or to build new facilities to import gas to Europe via LNG. Particularly, Eni has finalized plans to upgrade the import capacity of its two main pipelines from Russia and Algeria by 13 BCM/y (the gas pipelines TAG and TTPC), with new capacity entirely sold to third parties. A new LNG terminal with a capacity of 8 BCM/y commenced operations late in 2009, operated by a consortium of competitors. As a result, gas availability on the Italian market increased at a time when demand actually shrunk, resulting in a situation of oversupply. In this context, Eni’s results of the gas marketing business, sales volumes and average gas selling margins were driven down by rising competition and weak demand both in Italy and Europe. Large gas availability on European markets also prevented the Company from disposing of part of its gas availability by selling it on European markets. The outlook for gas supply and demand both in Europe and Italy is challenging as GDP growth in the 27 EU Countries will remain weak over the next few years and gas demand is expected to recover only gradually to precrisis levels. In addition, ongoing patterns towards energy preservation and rising competition from renewable or alternative sources of energy will further dampen recovery perspectives of gas demand. Specifically, at the March 2007 European Council, the European Heads of Government decided to adopt their Climate Action and Renewable Energy Package. This legislation was voted by the European Parliament in December 2008. The package includes a commitment to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 20% by 2020 compared to emission levels recorded in 1990 (the target being 30% if an international agreement is reached), as well as an improved energy efficiency within the EU Member States of 20% by 2020 and a 20% renewable energy target by 2020. To factor in those trends, management has revised down its long-term projections of European gas demand growth from a previous compound average growth rate (c.a.g.r.) of 2% till 2020 to a revised 1.5% c.a.g.r. These assumptions imply an overall consumption of approximately 600 BCM by 2020 compared to a previous forecast of 720 BCM. Management also expects the Italian market to grow less than anticipated at an annual rate that will be slightly lower than 2%, implying a level of consumption amounting to 94 BCM versus a previous forecast of 107 BCM at 2020. These demand trends of sluggish growth associated with ample gas availability on the marketplace might adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and cash flow in its gas marketing business over the next few years.

Current negative trends in gas demand and supply may impair the Company’s ability to fulfill its minimum off-take obligations in connection with its take-or-pay, long-term gas supply contracts
In order to secure long-term access to gas availability, particularly in view of supplying the Italian gas market,
the Company has signed a number of long-term gas supply contracts with key producing Countries that supply European gas markets. These contracts will ensure approximately 62.4 BCM of gas availability in 2010 (excluding the contribution of other subsidiaries and associates) with a residual life of approximately 20 years, and provide take-or-pay clauses whereby the Company is required to collect minimum predetermined volumes of gas in each year of the contractual term or, in case of failure, to pay the whole price, or a fraction of it, of uncollected volumes up to the minimum contractual quantity. The take-or-pay clause entitles the Company to collect pre-paid volumes of gas in later years during the period of contract execution. Amounts of cash prepayments and time schedules for collecting pre-paid gas vary from contract to contract. Generally speaking, cash pre-payments are calculated on the basis of the energy prices current in the year of non-fulfillment with the balance due in the year when the gas is actually collected. Amounts of pre-payments range from 10 to 100 percent of the full price. The right to collect pre-paid gas expires within a ten-year term in some contracts or remains in place until contract expiration in other arrangements. In addition, rights to collect pre-paid gas in future years can be exercised provided that the Company has fulfilled its minimum take obligation in a given year and within the limit of the maximum annual quantity that can be collected in each contractual year. In this case, Eni will pay the residual price calculating it as the percentage

F-75


that complements 100, based on the arithmetical average of monthly base prices in place in the year of the off-take. Similar considerations apply to ship-or-pay contractual obligations. Management believes that the current outlook for gas demand and large gas availability on the marketplace, as well as the possible evolution of sector-specific regulation, represent risks factors to the Company’s ability to fulfill its minimum take obligations associated with its long-term supply contracts. Under current contractual terms, in 2009 Eni collected lower volumes than its minimum take and recognized a trade payables corresponding to the amount of gas that the Company was contractually required to collect. Management believes that over the next three years the Company will experience failure to fulfill its take-or-pay obligations associated with significant volumes of gas, unless demand fundamentals improve substantially and a better balance between demand and supply is achieved on the marketplace. Currently, the Company is unable to forecast the timing of such a recovery. In addition, there also exist both a pricing risk as a portion of the gas purchase price is based on the prices of the energy parameters recorded in the year of non-fulfillment, and a volume risk in case the Company is actually unable to dispose of pre-paid volumes. In this context, the Company’s selling margins, results of operations and cash flow may be negatively affected. Based on management’s projections for sales volumes and prices for the four-year plan and subsequent years, volumes for which an obligation to pay cash advances might arise due to take or pay clauses will be off-taken within contractual terms, thus recovering cash advances. Even if financing associated with cash advances is factored in, the net present value associated with those long-term contracts discounted at the weighted average cost of capital for the Gas & Power segment still remains a positive and consequently those contracts do not fall within the category of the onerous contract provided by IAS 37. In the medium term Eni intends to preserve the profitability and cash flow generation of its gas marketing operations. A number of initiatives have been identified, including:

Risks associated with sector-specific regulations in Italy
Legislative Decree No. 164/2000 opened the Italian natural gas market to competition, impacting on Eni’s activities, as the company is engaged in all the phases of the natural gas chain. The opening to competition was achieved through the enactment of certain antitrust thresholds on volumes input into the national transport network and on volumes sold to final customers. These enabled new competitors to enter the Italian gas market, resulting in declining selling margins on gas. Other material aspects regarding the Italian gas sector regulationregulations are the regulated access to natural gas infrastructure (transport backbones, storage fields, distribution networks and LNG terminals), the provision that activities relating to infrastructures are mandatory charged to separate companies; the Code adopted by the Authority for Electricity and Gas on the issue of unbundling which forbids a controlling entity from interfering in the decision-making process of its subsidiaries running gas transport and distribution and other infrastructures and the circumstance that the Authority for Electricity and Gas is entrusted with certain powers in the matters of natural gas pricing and in establishing tariffs for the use of natural gas infrastructures. Particularly,Specifically, the Authority for Electricity and Gas holds a general surveillance power on pricing in the natural gas market in Italy and the power to establish selling tariffs for the supply of natural gas to residential and commercial users consuming less than 200,000 CM/y (qualified as non eligible customers atas of December 31, 2002 as defined by Legislative Decree No. 164/2000) taking into account the public goal of containing the inflationary pressure due to rising energy costs. Accordingly, decisions of the Authority on these matters may limit the ability of Eni to pass an increase in the cost of fuels onto final consumers of natural gas. As a matter of fact, followingFollowing a complex and lengthy administrative procedure started in 2004 and finalized in March 2007 with Resolution No. 79/2007, the Authority finally established a new indexation mechanism for updating the raw material cost component in supplies to residential and commercial users consuming less than 200,000 CM/y, establishing, among other things: (i) that an increase in the international price of Brent crude oil is only partially transferred to residential and commercial users of natural gas in case international prices of Brent crude oil exceed the 35 dollars per barrel threshold; and (ii)things that Italian natural gas importers – including Eni – must renegotiate wholesale supply contracts in order to take account of thisa new indexation mechanism.

mechanism of the raw material cost component. This indexation mechanism has been recently updated based on Resolution No. 64/2009 of the Authority, which provides that changes in a preset basket of hydrocarbons are transferred to the cost of the supply to those customers. Also a floor has been established in the form of a fixed amount that applies only at certain low level of international prices of hydrocarbons. Also certain provisions of law may limit the CompanyCompany’s ability to set commercial margins. Specifically, Law Decree No. 112 enacted in June 2008 forbids energy companies like Eni to pass to prices to final customers the higher income taxes incurred in connection with a supplemental tax rate of 5.56.5 percentage points introduced by the same decree on energy companies with a yearly turnover in excess of euro 25 million. The Authority for Electricity and Gas is in charge of monitoring compliance with thethis rule. The Authority

F-76


has subsequently established with a set of deliberations that energy companies have to adopt effective operational and monitoring systems certified by the Company CEO in order to prevent unlawful increases ofin final prices of gas.

In order to meet Other risk factors and uncertainties deriving from the medium and long-term demand for natural gas, in particular inregulatory framework are associated with the Italian market, Eni entered into long-term purchase contracts with producing countries. These contracts which contain take-or-pay clauses will ensure total supply volumesregulation of approximately 62.4 BCM/y of natural gas to Eni by 2010 (excluding take-or-pay volumes coming from Distrigas acquisition which will destined to supply the Belgian market). Despite the fact that an increasing portion of natural gas volumes purchased under said contracts is planned to be marketed outside Italy, management believes that in the long-term unfavorable trends in the Italian demand and supply for natural gas, also taking into account the start-up of new import capacityaccess to the Italian marketgas transport network that is currently set by Decision No. 137/2002 of the Authority for Electricity and Gas. The decision is fully incorporated into the network code presently in force as prepared by the system’s operator. The decision sets priority criteria for transport capacity entitlements at points where the Italian transport network connects with international import pipelines (the so-called entry points to the Italian transport system). Specifically, operators that are holders of take-or-pay contracts, as in the case of Eni, and third parties

F-68


as well as implementation of all publicly announced plans for the construction of new import infrastructures (backbone upgrading and new LNG terminals), and developmentsare entitled to a priority in allocating available transport capacity within the Italian regulatory framework, represent risk factorslimit of average daily contractual volumes. Gas volumes exceeding average daily contractual volumes are not entitled to any priority and, in case of congestion at any entry points, they are entitled available capacity on a proportionate basis together with all pending requests for thecapacity assignments. The ability of the CompanyEni to meet its contractual obligations in connection withcollect gas volumes exceeding average daily volumes as provided by its take-or-pay supply contracts. Particularly,contracts represents an important operational flexibility that the Company uses to satisfy demand peaks. In planning its commercial flows, the Company normally assumes to make full use of its contractual flexibility and to obtain the necessary capacity entitlements at the entry points to the national transport network. Those assumptions may be inconsistent with rules set by Decision No. 137/2002 specifically with regard to priority criteria governing capacity entitlements. Eni considers Decision No. 137/2002 to be illegitimate as it is supposedly in contrast with the rationale of the European regulatory framework on the gas market as provided in European Directive 55/2003/CE. Based on that belief the Company has opened an administrative procedure to repeal Decision No. 137/2002 before an administrative court which recently confirmed in part Eni’s position. An upper grade court also confirmed the Company’s position. Specifically, the Court stated that the purchase of contractual flexibility is an obligation on part of the importer, which responds to a collective interest. According to the Court, there is no reasonable motivation whereby volumes corresponding to such contractual flexibility should natural gas demandnot be granted priority in Italy grow at a lower pace than management expectations,the access to the network, also in viewcase congestion occurs. At the moment, however, no case of the expected build-up of natural gas suppliescongestion occurred at entry points to the Italian market,transport infrastructure such to impair Eni’s marketing plans. Further uncertainty factors related to the Company could faceregulatory framework are the so called gas release measures that are intended to increase flexibility and liquidity in the gas market. This measure strongly affected Eni’s marketing activity in Italy. In 2004, based on certain agreements with the Antitrust Authority, Eni released in a further increasefour-year period a total amount of 9.2 BCM (2.3 BCM/y between October 1, 2004 and September 30, 2008) and the related transport capacity. In addition, in competitive pressure2007 Eni agreed to adhere to a new gas release program involving 4 BCM which were disposed of at the virtual exchange point (PSV) in a two-year period (from October 1, 2007 and September 30, 2009). For thermal year 2009-2010 Italian Law No. 99/2009 introduced a new obligation for Eni to make additional sales at the virtual exchange point for a total of 5 BCM of gas in yearly and half-yearly amounts. Although the allotment procedure (bid) was based on a minimum price set by the Ministry for Economic Development as proposed by the Authority (Eni considering this point discriminatory, filed a claim to the competent authority), only a 1.1 BCM portion of the gas release was awarded out of the 5 BCM which had been planned. For the next few years, based on indications of the Authority (in a report to the Parliament on the Italiansituation of the gas and electricity market resulting in a negative impactItaly as provided in Resolution PAS 3/2010), Eni cannot exclude the possibility that new gas release programs will be imposed on its selling margins, taking account of Eni’s gas availability under take-or-pay supply contracts and risks in executing its expansion plans to grow sales volumes in European markets.it.

Specific risks associated with the exploration and production of oil and natural gas
The exploration
Exploration and production of oil and natural gas requires high levels of capital expenditure and entails particular economic risks. It is subject to natural hazards and other uncertainties including those relating to the physical characteristics of oil or natural gas fields. Exploratory activity involves numerous risks including the risk of dry holes or failure to find commercial quantities of hydrocarbons. Developing and marketing hydrocarbons reserves typically requires several years after a discovery is made. This is because a development project involves an array of complex and lengthy activities, including appraising a discovery in order to evaluate its commerciality, sanctioning a development project and building and commissioning relatingrelated facilities.

As a consequence, rates of return of such long lead-time projects are exposed to the volatility of oil and gas prices and the risk of an increase in developing and lifting costs, resulting in lower rates of return. This set of circumstances is particularly important to those projects intended to develop reserves located in deep water and harsh environments, where the majority of Eni’s planned and ongoing projects isare located.

Managing sources of funds
Eni management makes useRisks associated with the cyclicality of the leverage asoil and gas sector
The global economic downturn and the associated reduction in industrial output recorded in 2008 and for most of 2009 triggered a financial measuresharp decline in worldwide demand for energy, resulting in significantly lower commodity prices.

F-77


In spite of weak fundamentals (level of global demand and level of inventories), international oil prices have shown a steady upward trend since the second half of 2009 driven by expectations for a global economic recovery and OPEC production cuts, settling by year end in a range of 70-80 $/BBL.

Volatile oil prices pose a critical issue to assess the soundnesssustainability of capital plans of oil and efficiencygas companies, considering that they are engaged in long lead-time projects. Such projects normally require lengthy and complex activities for assessing all technical and commercial aspects and developing and marketing hydrocarbons. As a consequence, return rates of projects are exposed to the volatility of oil and gas prices which may be substantially lower with respect to prices assumed when the investment decision was made, resulting in lower rates of return. The Company, likewise other players in the industry, assesses its oil & gas projects based on long-term scenarios for oil prices, which reflect management’s best assumptions about the underlying fundamentals of global demand and offer. The adoption of long-term prices in assessing capital projects support the achievement of the Group balance sheetplanned rates of return.

Eni plans to invest euro 52.8 billion in the four-year period from 2010 through 2013, at the Company’s long-term price for Brent crude of 65 $/BBL (in real terms 2013). Of this, euro 37.7 billion, or 71%, will be dedicated to execute projects for exploring and developing oil and gas reserves. The plan shows an increase of 8% from the previous plan that was approved when the trading environment was particularly depressed. The main drivers which explain the increase are: (i) planned expenditures for developing new upstream projects, particularly those associated with reserves development in Iraq, Venezuela and certain fields offshore Angola; (ii) the circumstance that the Company is forecasting steady trends in costs for materials and sector specific services which have fallen far less than what management has anticipated due to the fast recovery in international oil prices, and the impact of the decision on part of most oil companies to maintain their spending patterns substantially unchanged. In the previous plan, management assumed a decline in those costs. These increasing trends will be partially offset by the impact of the U.S. dollar depreciation versus the euro.

Volatile oil prices also influence the reserve replacement ratio. Changes in oil prices normally trigger two opposite impacts in proved reserves revisions. On one side, a larger or smaller amount of reserves is booked in connection with production sharing agreements and similar contractual schemes. Under such contracts, the Company is entitled to receive a portion of the production, the sale of which should cover expenditures incurred and earn the Company a share of profit. Accordingly, the higher the reference prices for crude oil used to determine production and reserves entitlements, the lower the number of barrels to cover the same dollar amounts hence the amounts of booked reserves; and vice versa. On the other side, downward revisions of reserves occur for those marginal amounts of reserves that are no longer economically producible based on oil prices that are significantly lower than those at which they were originally assessed and sanctioned; and the opposite occurs in case of higher oil prices.

In the Gas & Power segment, Eni’s outlook for the year 2010 factors in a modest improvement in Italian and European gas demand, recovering from the sharp decline suffered in 2009.

Eni also expects that the gas market will be well supplied as new import capacity to Europe and Italy is available in light of recent facility start-ups and upgrades of the main importpipelines made by Eni and other operators. Those trends, together with the recently enacted gas release programs in Italy, represent risk factors to the Company’s ability to maintain its margins in the marketing business also taking into account the take or pay clauses of certain long-term supply contracts which require the Company to collect minimum predetermined volumes of gas or, in case of failure, to pay the price, or a portion of it, for uncollected volumes. Under take or pay clauses the Company is entitled to collect pre-paid volumes of gas in future years, assuming a stronger recovery in gas demand.

The Refining & Marketing and the Petrochemical segments are particularly exposed to the volatility of the economic cycle, as their respective industries continue to be plagued by excess capacity, intense competitive pressure, low entry barriers and commoditized products. These industries are also exposed to movements in oil prices and the speed at which the prices of refined products and petrochemicals products adjust to reflect change in the cost of oil-based feedstock. Normally, a time lag occurs between movements in oil prices and those of refined and petrochemical products. As a consequence, in a period of rapidly escalating feedstock costs, margins on refined and petrochemical products are negatively affected.

For 2010, Eni’s management does not expect any appreciable recovery in the main trends that negatively affected the performances of these businesses last year. In 2009 Eni’s realized refining margins were sharply lower mirroring the environment for Brent margins (down 50%), while margins on a mix of light and heavy crude were further lower, down by 60%, both under break-even. A number of negative factors contribute to the reduction. Firstly, significantly compressed light-heavy crude differentials due to a reduction in heavy crude availability on the market place negatively affected the profitability of Eni’s complex refineries. Secondly, the industry continued to be plagued by weak fundamentals due to excess capacity, high inventory levels and stagnant demand affecting end-

F-78


prices, while feedstock costs have been on an upward trend since the beginning of the second half. Finally, middle-distillates prices plunged to historical lows in terms of optimal mix between net borrowings and net equity,spread versus the cost of oil. At the moment, management does not expect a reversal in those trends on the short-term.

In its Petrochemical segment, management has been pursuing a number of initiatives designed to reduce fixed operating expenses and to carry out benchmark analysisrealign the industrial set-up of Eni’s petrochemical operations with industry standards. Leverage is a measureview of enhancing areas of competitive advantage. In spite of all this, the achievement of the company’s leveloperating break-even in this segment depends on a global recovery in the economy that is uncertain at least in the short term.

The Engineering & Construction segment followed a different trend, maintaining a steady order backlog and economic returns, thanks to a business model articulated across various market sectors combined with a strong competitive position in frontier areas, which are traditionally less exposed to the cyclical nature of indebtedness, calculated asthis market. The start of operations of new distinctive assets in 2010 and 2011 coupled with the ratio between net borrowingssize and shareholders’ equity, including minority interests. Inquality of the medium-term, management plans to target a level of leverage up to 0.4 which is intended to provide an efficient capital structurebacklog and the appropriate levelstrong operating performance on projects, underpin expectations for a further significant strengthening of financial flexibility.Saipem’s competitive position in the medium term.

F-69


Other information about financial instruments
The carrying amount of financial instruments and relevant economic effect as of and for the yearyears ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 consisted of the following:

  2008 2009
  
 
  Finance income (expense) recognized inFinance income (expense) recognized in
 
 
(euro million) 

Carrying amount

Profit and loss account

Equity

Carrying amountProfit and loss accountEquity
  
 
 



Held-for-trading financial instruments                    
Non-hedging derivatives (a) 

(374

) 

(558

)    (374) (558)   (26) 45   
Held-to-maturity financial instruments                    
Securities 

50

 

2

 

3

 
Securities (b) 50 2   36 1   
Available-for-sale financial instruments                    
Securities (a) 

495

 

19

   
Securities (b) 495 19 3 348 13 1 
Receivables and payables and other assets/liabilities valued at amortized cost                    
Trade and receivables and other (b)(c) 

22,446

 

(254

)    22,446 (254)   20,748 (361)   
Financing receivables (a)(b) 

1,908

 

117

    1,908 117   1,637 72   
Trade payables and other (c)(d) 

20,570

 

(53

)    20,570 (53)   19,228 (48)   
Financing payables (a)(b) 

20,837

 

(607

)    20,837 (607)   24,800 (508)   
Assets at fair value through profit or loss (fair value option)                    
Investments (a)(b) 

2,741

 

241

    2,741 241     163   
Net liabilities for hedging derivatives (d)(e) 

280

 

1,012

 

964

  280 1,012 964 751 161 (636)
 


 
 
 
   
(a) GainsIn the profit and loss account, incomes were recognized within "Other operating income (loss)" for euro 49 million (expenses for euro 131 million at December 31, 2008) and within "Finance income (expense)" for euro 4 million (expenses for euro 427 million at December 31, 2008).
(b)Income or lossesexpense were recognized in the profit and loss account within "Finance income (expense)".
(b)(c) In the profit and loss account, essentially impairments and losses on receivables were recognized within "Purchase, services and other" for euro 427 million (euro 385 million whilst negativeat December 31, 2008) while positive exchange differences arising from accounts denominated in foreign currency and translated into euro at year-end were recognized within "Finance income (expense)" for euro 100 million.66 million (euro 131 million at December 31, 2008).
(c)(d) PositiveIn the profit and loss account, primarily exchange differences arising from accounts denominated in foreign currency and translated into euro at year-end were recognized in the profit and loss account within "Finance income (expense)".
(d)(e) GainsIncome or lossesexpense were recognized in the profit and loss account within "Net sales from operations" and "Purchase, services and other" for euro 155 million (euro 1,005 million at December 31, 2008) within "Finance income (expense)" for euro 6 million (euro 7 million at December 31, 2008) (time value component).

Fair value of financial instruments
Following the classification of financial assets and liabilities, measured at fair value in the balance sheet, is provided according to the fair value hierarchy defined on the basis of the relevance of the inputs used in the measurement process. In particular, on the basis of the features of the inputs used in making the measurements, the fair value hierarchy shall have the following levels:

(a)Level 1: quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical financial assets or liabilities;

F-79


(b)Level 2: measurements based on the basis of inputs, other than quoted prices above, which, for assets and liabilities that have to be measured, can be observable directly (e.g. prices) or indirectly (e.g. deriving from prices);
(c)Level 3: inputs not based on observable market data.

Financial instruments measured at fair value in the balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 were classified as follows: (i) level 1, "Other financial assets held for trading or available for sale"; (ii) level 2, derivative instruments included in "Other current assets", "Other non-current assets", "Other current liabilities" and "Other non-current liabilities". During 2009 no transfers were done between the different hierarchy levels of fair value. More information about the amount of financial instruments valued at fair value are provided in Note 2 – Other financial assets held for trading or available for sale, Note 7 – Other current assets, Note 14 – Other non-current assets, Note 19 – Other current liabilities and Note 24 – Other non-current liabilities.


Legal Proceedings

Eni is a party to a number of civil actions and administrative arbitral and other judicial proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Based on information available to date, and taking into account the existing risk provisions, Eni believes that the foregoing will not have an adverse effect on Eni’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

The following is a description of the most significant proceedings currently pending. Unless otherwise indicated below, no provisions have been made for these legal proceedings as Eni believes that negative outcomes are not probable or because the amount of the provision cannot be estimated reliably.


1. Environment

1.1 Criminal proceedings

ENI SPA
(i) Subsidence. Subsidence. The Court of Rovigo conducted investigations concerning a subsidence phenomenon allegedly caused by hydrocarbon exploration and extraction activities in the Ravenna and North Adriatic area both on land and in the sea. Eni appointed an independent and interdisciplinary scientific commission, composed of prominent and highly qualified international experts of subsidence caused by hydrocarbon exploration and extraction activities, with the aim of verifying the magnitude and effects and any actions appropriate to reduce or to neutralize any subsidence phenomenon in the area. This commission produced a study which excludes the possibility of any risk to human health or damage to the environment. The study also states that worldwide there are no instances of accidents of harm to public safety caused by subsidence induced by hydrocarbon production. It also shows that Eni employs the most advanced techniques for monitoring, measuring and controlling the soil. This proceeding is

F-70


in the first level hearing stage. The Veneto Region, other local bodies and two private entities have been acting as plaintiffs. Eni was admitted as a defendant. The Court decided thatAt the proceeding must be heard byend of the renewed preliminary investigations the Court of Ravenna.Ravenna requested the closing of the proceeding. According to press news a number of plaintiffs would file appeals against this decision.
(ii) Alleged damage.damage - Prosecuting body: Public Prosecutor of Gela. In 2002, the public prosecutor of Gela commenced a criminal investigation to ascertain alleged damage caused by emissions of the Gela plant, owned by Polimeri Europa SpA, Syndial SpA (formerly EniChem SpA) and Raffineria di Gela SpA. The judge for the preliminary hearing dismissed the accusation of adulteration of food products, while the proceeding for the other allegations regarding pollution and environmental damage remains underway. The trial ended in acquittal with regard to the general manager and officer pro tempore of the refinery. The sentence of the Gela Tribunal stated that the charges were lacking factual basis. A number of farmers of Gela area, who have been acting as plaintiffs in the first level hearing stage, filed an appeal against the acquittal sentence in the civil action. In the first hearing on December 17, 2009, the public prosecutor asked for the dismissal of the appeal confirming the motivations of the acquittal sentence in the first degree proceeding. The Court of Rome postponed the proceeding to the hearing of February 25, 2010. In February 25, 2010 the Court confirmed the acquittal sentence. The Court would file the grounds of the judgments within the next 60 days.
(iii) Alleged negligent fire in the refinery of Gela. In June 2002, in connection with a fire at the refinery of Gela, a criminal investigation began concerning alleged negligent fire, environmental crimes and crimes

F-80


against natural beauty. First degree proceedings ended with an acquittal sentence. In November 2007, the public prosecutors of Gela and of Caltanissetta filed an appeal against this decision. In the first hearing the Court re-opened the examining phase, arranging a collegial appraiser. On December 10, 2009 the appraisers appointed by the Court filed their report. On January 21, 2010 the Court of Caltanissetta announced an acquittal sentence for all the defendants.
(iv) Investigation of the quality of ground water in the area of the refinery of Gela. In 2002, the public prosecutor of Gela commenced a criminal investigation concerning the refinery of Gela to ascertain the quality of ground water in the area of the refinery. Eni is charged of having breached environmental rules concerning the pollution of water and soil and of illegal disposal of liquid and solid waste materials. The preliminary hearing phase was closed for one employee who would stand trial, while the preliminary hearing phase is ongoing for other defendants. During the hearings the judge admitted as plaintiffs three environmental associations. The proceeding was subsequently assigned to a different judge and was disposed the renewal of the debate phase. In the said phase were examined indictment and defense witnesses. Subsequently it was examined the first technical appraiser of the defense. The proceeding continues with examination of another technical appraiser of the defense.
(v) Alleged negligent fire (Priolo). The public prosecutor of Siracusa commenced an investigation regarding certain Eni managers who were previously in charge of conducting operations at the Priolo refinery (Eni divested this asset in 2002) to ascertain whether they acted with negligence in connection with a fire that occurred at the Priolo plants on April 30 and May 1-2, 2006. After preliminary investigations and based on the outcome of preliminary hearing the public prosecutor requested the opening of a proceeding against the mentioned managers for negligent behavior. The first hearing, in which the parties could present themselves as plaintiffs, was scheduled for February 26, 2010. On February 5, 2010, the Court of Siracusa following the exception of inadmissibility issued by the defendants, admitted as a plaintiff the only the Ministry for the Environment excluding all the other counterparts, including the Council of Ministers. The proceeding continues with the examination of three witnesses of the Public Prosecutor.
(vi) Groundwater at the Priolo site.site - Prosecuting body: Public Prosecutor of Siracusa. The Public Prosecutor of Siracusa (Sicily) has started an investigation in order to ascertain the level of contamination of the groundwater at the Priolo site. The Company has been notified that a number of its executive officers are being investigated who were in charge at the time of the events subject to probe, including chief executive officers and plant general managers of the Company’s subsidiaries AgipPetroli SpA (now merged into the parent company)company Eni SpA in the Refining & Marketing division), Syndial and Polimeri Europa. Probes on technical issues are ongoing as required by the Prosecutor.
ENIPOWER SPA
(i)Alleged unauthorized waste management activities. In 2004,Prosecutor were finalized on October 15, 2009. On February 25, 2010 the public prosecutortechnical survey was filed. According to this report the ground and the groundwater at the Priolo site should be considered polluted according to Law Decree 152/2006. This contamination was caused by a spill over made in the period prior to 2001 and not subsequent to 2005; the equipments still operating on the site represent another source of Rovigo commenced an investigation for alleged crimes related to unauthorized waste management activitiesrisk, in Loreo relatingparticular the ones owned by another operator. According to the samplesfindings of soil used duringthis report the constructiondefense of Syndial, Polimeri Europa and Eni SpA (Refining & Marketing division) will file a defensive memorandum to request the dismissal of the new EniPower power station in Mantova. The prosecutor requested the CEO of EniPower and the managing director of the Mantova plant at the time of the alleged crime to stand trial.
(ii)Air emissions. The public prosecutor of Mantova commenced an investigation against two managers of the Mantova plant in connection with air emissions by the new power plant.proceeding.

SYNDIAL SPA
(i)(vii) Porto Torres.Torres - Prosecuting body: Public Prosecutor of Sassari. In March 2009, the Public Prosecutor of Sassari (Sardinia) resolved to commence a criminal trial against a number of executive officers and managing directors of companies engaging in petrochemicals operations at the site of Porto Torres, including the manager responsible for plant operations of the Company’s fully-owned subsidiary Syndial. The charge involves environmental damage and poisoning of water and stuff destined to feeding. AIn the preliminary hearing ison July 17, 2009, the Province of Sassari, the Association Anpana (animal preservation) and the company Fratelli Polese Snc situated in the industrial site have been acting as plaintiffs. None of these parties claimed the identification of the civil responsible and the damage quantification that will be asked in a second step. The legal defense of Syndial requested further time for the recognition of the proceeding plaintiffs and the verification of their right to institute proceedings. The defense of Syndial filled a number of exceptions on the admissibility in acting as plaintiffs of the counterpart; the judge will resolve the question in the hearing which has been scheduled for February 19, 2010. In this hearing the judge, based on the exceptions issued by Syndial on the lack of connection between the action as plaintiff and the charge, excluded all the counterparts that have been acting as plaintiff with regard to the serious pathologies related to the existence of poisoning agents in July 2009.the fishing talent of the industrial port of Porto Torres; the judge admitted as plaintiffs the Municipality of Sassari, the Environmental Association Anpana and the company Fratelli Polese Snc. The judge also requested that Syndial SpA, Polimeri Europa SpA, Ineos Vinylis and Sasol Italy SpA stand trial. The proceeding continues for the constitution as defendants of the said parts.

F-81


1.2 Civil and administrative proceedings

SYNDIAL SPA (FORMER ENICHEM SPA)
(i) Alleged pollution caused by the activity of the Mantova plant.In 1992, the Ministry of Environment summoned EniChem SpA (now Syndial SpA) and Edison SpA before the Court of Brescia. The Ministry requested, primarily, environmental remediation for the alleged pollution caused by the activity

F-71


of the Mantova plant from 1976 until 1990, and provisionally, in case there was no possibility to remediate, the payment of environmental damages. Edison agreed on a settlement with the Ministry whereby Edison quantified compensation for environmental damage freeing from any obligation Syndial, which purchased the plant in 1989. Parties are working through a possible settlementNegotiations between the parts for the quantification of the matter.environmental damage (relating only to 1990) are underway; the judgment has been postponed a number of times until the next hearing that has been scheduled for January 28, 2010. This hearing has been adjourned again to July 22, 2010 because negotiations between the parts are underway.
(ii) Summon before the Court of Venice for environmental damages allegedly caused to the lagoon of Venice by the Porto Marghera plants.On December 13, 2002, EniChem SpA (now Syndial SpA), jointly with Ambiente SpA (now merged into Syndial SpA) and European Vinyls Corporation Italia SpA (EVC Italia, then Ineos Vinyls SpA, actually Vinyls Italia SpA) was summoned before the Court of Venice by the Province of Venice. The province requested compensation for environmental damages that initially were not quantified, allegedly caused to the lagoon of Venice by the Porto Marghera plants, which were already the subject of two previous criminal proceedings against employees and managers of the defendants. EVCVinyls Italia and IneosSpA presented an action to be indemnified by Eni’s Group companies in case the alleged pollution is proved. The environmentalProvince of Venice, in the preliminary stage of the proceeding, filed claims amounting to euro 287 million. Syndial submitted its written reply evidencing that the abovementioned damage quantification has been assessed by an independent consultant who filed his advicemade lacking of probations for the damage and based on evidence that allowed the Court of First and Second Instance to be discussed indisclaim EniChem of any responsibility through definitive sentence. In the hearing on October 16, 2009, scheduled to review the technical appraisal, the Court declared the interruption of the proceeding because Vinyls Italia had undergone a hearing set in October 2009.reorganization procedure. The proceeding is suspended until the eventual action as plaintiff of the Province of Venice.
(iii) Claim of environmental damages, allegedly caused by industrial activities in the area of Crotone commenced- Prosecuting Bodies: the Council of Ministers, the Ministry for the Environment, the Delegated Commissioner for Environmental Emergency in the Calabria Region and the Calabria Region. The council of Ministers, the Ministry for the Environment, the Delegated Commissioner for Environmental Emergency in the Calabria Region and the Calabria Region requested Syndial to appear before the Court of Milan in order Syndial is condemned to compensate for the environmental damage caused by the Presidentoperations of Pertusola Sud SpA (merged in EniChem, now Syndial) in the Regional CouncilCrotone site. This first degree proceeding was generated in January 2008 by the unification of Calabria. On April 14, 2003,two different actions, the Presidentfirst brought by Calabria Region in October 2004, the second one by the council of Ministers, the Regional Council of Calabria, asMinistry for the environment and the Delegated Commissioner for Environmental Emergency in the Calabria Region commenced an action against EniChem SpA (now Syndial SpA) with referencein February 2006. The Calabria Region is claiming compensation amounting to euro 129 million for the site environmental remediation and clean-up on the basis of the cost estimation provided in the remediation plan submitted by the Delegated Commissioner, plus additional compensation amounting to a preliminary estimate of euro 800 million relating to environmental damagesdamage, estimated increases in the regional health expenditures and damage to the public image to be fairly determined during the civil proceeding. The council of Ministers, the Ministry for approximatelythe Environment and the Delegated Commissioner is claiming compensation amounting to euro 129 million for the site environmental remediation and clean-up (this request is analogous to that of the Calabria Region) and eventual compensation for other environmental damage to be fairly determined during the civil proceeding. In February 2007 the Ministry for the Environment filed with the Court an independent appraiser’s report issued by APAT that estimated a refundable environmental damage amounting to euro 1,920 million, including the remediation and clean-up expenditures, increased by euro 1,620 million from the original amount of euro 129 million, and damagesan estimation of environmental damage and other damage items amounting approximately to euro 300 million. The amounts estimated by the independent appraiser, added to the claim of the Calabria Region, generate a total of euro 2,720 million of potential compensation. In May and September 2007 Syndial presented its own technical advice that, based on what the Company believes to be well-founded circumstances, vigorously object the independent appraiser’s findings filed by the Ministry for euro 250 million (plus interestthe Environment on site contamination, the responsibility of Syndial in the contamination of the site, the criteria of estimate remediation costs, which according to the Company are erroneous, arbitrary and compensation)technically inadequate. On October 7, 2009 an independent appraiser report was filed that reviewed the environmental status of the site and estimated the remediation costs while the estimate of both the health damage caused by the pollution and the environmental damage would be issued in connectiona further independent appraiser report. The findings of the independent appraisers are substantially in line with lossthe issues expressed by Syndial on the measures for

F-82


the environmental remediation and clean-up, based on a risk analysis aimed to define effective and specific actions. The clean-up project, approved to a great extent by the ministry for the Environment and the Calabria Region, has been considered substantially adequate. The independent appraisers affirmed the necessity of incomeclean-up measures that were not planned by Syndial on one of the external areas (the so-called archaeological area) and considered being unnecessary the dredging of sea sediments. The estimated clean-up costs are in line with the estimate made by Syndial. The independent appraiser report is less favorable to Syndial because it identifies as source of the contamination the production slag management, even recent. The independent appraiser report evaluated that the production technology was a BAT (best available technology), instead the slag treatment could be performed in a more respectful way for the environment and the products (the so-called Cubilot) lacked the physic-chemical characteristic of stability that would avoided the emission of polluting agents in the soil. As regards the quantification of the environmental damage different by the remediation, the independent report APAT provided by the Ministry of Environment quantified the damage for the lack of fruition of the site basing on the remediation costs that were significantly reduced by the independent appraiser report. In case the judge resolves on the responsibility of Syndial in the contamination of the site based on the conclusions of the independent appraiser report, the Company could be liable, for the environmental damage different from the goods fruition (damage to the community, increases in the regional health expenditures), at least in part and as far as the damage is actually probed. On November 14, 2009, Syndial filed its objections to the independent appraiser report, sharing the conceptual model adopted by the independent appraiser report but demonstrating that the site contamination should be charged mainly to past management of the pollution slag on part of other operators that operated the site until the '70s. On November 11, 2009 the Calabria Region filed its objection to the independent appraiser report affirming that the environmental damage to property allegedly causedthe surrounding areas of the site has not been assessed by the independent appraisers. The hearing for the review of the independent appraiser report and of the parts objections has yet to be held, as it has been assigned to another judge.
In order to arrange for a possible resolution of all environmental claims, in 2007 Eni’s subsidiary Syndial took charge of the management of the clean-up activities and on December 5, 2008 presented a new clean-up project. As for the approval procedure of the abovementioned project all interested parties approved the removal of the dump from the seafront to another area, the construction of an hydraulic barrier and of the related treatment plant of the groundwater (providing that if the subsequent monitoring would demonstrate the efficiency of the plant, Eni’s subsidiary would build up a physical barrier in the seafront) and the start-up of the first lot of activities on the soil through in situ technologies on condition that all the waste present in the areas, recognized after a specific inspection.
Initially, the environmental provision made by Syndial in its financial statements amounted to euro 103 million based on the cost estimation of the original clean-up project, as the Eni’s subsidiary believes to have no responsibility for the environmental damage considering the limited period during which it conducted industrial activities in the areasite and the Delegated Commissioner responsibility for not having properly managed the site cleanup activities. In the 2008 financial statements, Eni increased the environmental provision by euro 154 million bringing the total amount of Crotone. In addition, the environmental provision related to the clean-up project to euro 257 million. The provision doesn’t cover the entire amount of clean-up project expenses (euro 300 million) considering the circumstance that it has been only partially approved. It must be noted that in 2003 the Delegated Commissioner for Environmental Emergency, Calabria Region and Province of Crotone is acting as plaintiff, claiming damagepresented a first claim for euro 300 million.the payment of damages. With a decision in May 2007, the Court of Milan declared the invalidity of the power of proxy conferred to the Delegated Commissioner to act on behalf of the Calabria Region with the notice served to Syndial SpA and decided the liquidation of expenses born by the defendant. The Province of Crotone appealedappeal against that decision is pending. The claims made in this decision. The secondfirst instance court accepted this appeal and Syndial repealed this determination. On October 21, 2004, Syndial was convened before the Court of Milan by the Calabria Region which is seeking to obtain a condemnation of Syndial for a damage payment, should the office of the Delegated Commissioner for Environmental Emergencyare substantially absorbed in the Calabria Region cease during this proceeding. The Calabria Region requested a damage payment amounting to euro 800 million as already requested by the Delegated Commissioner for Environmental Emergency in the Calabria Region in the proceeding commenced in 2003. This new proceeding is in the preliminary investigation stage. This proceeding was unified with the one opened by the Ministry of the Environment. Syndial filed a new project for the environmental remediation of the site to be approved by the Ministry and the body of public administrations and entities involved in the matter that expressed a first partial consent in January 2009. The environmental provision was consequently increased. In 2006, the Council of Ministers, Ministry for the Environment and the Delegated Commissioner for Environmental Emergency in the Calabria Region represented by the State Lawyer requested Syndial to appear before the Court of Milan to obtain the ascertainment, quantification and payment of damage (in the form of land, air and water pollution and therefore of the general condition of the population) caused by the operations of Pertusola Sud SpA in the Municipality of Crotone and in surrounding municipalities. The local authorities requested the ascertainment of Syndial’s responsibility as concerns expenses borne and to be borne for the cleanup and reclamation of sites, currently quantified at euro 129 million. This proceeding concerns the same matter and damage claim as the proceedings commenced by the Delegated Commissioner for Environmental Emergency in the Calabria Region and the Calabria Region against Syndial in 2003 and 2004, respectively.two subsequent proceedings.
(iv) Summon for alleged environmental damage caused by DDT pollution in the Lake Maggiore.Maggiore - Prosecuting body: Ministry of the Environment. With a temporarily executive decision dated July 3, 2008 the District Court of Turin sentenced the subsidiary Syndial SpA (former EniChem) to compensate for environmental damages that were allegedly caused when EniChem managed an industrial plant at Pieve Vergonte during the 1990-1996 period. Specifically, the Court sentenced Syndial to pay the Italian Ministry of the Environment compensation amounting to euro 1,833.5 million, plus legal interests that accrue from the filing of the decision. Syndial and Eni technical-legal consultants have considered the decision and the amount of the compensation to be without factual and legal basis and have concluded that a negative outcome of this proceeding is unlikely. Particularly, Eni and its subsidiary deem the amount of the environmental damage to be absolutely ill-founded as the sentence has been considered to lack sufficient elements to support such a material amount of the liability charged to Eni and its subsidiary with respect to the volume of pollutants ascertained by the Italian Environmental Minister. As no developmentOn occasion of the proceeding has occurred since the filing of the Court’s decision,2008 consolidated financial statements, management has confirmed its stance of making no loss provision for this proceeding on the basis of the abovementioned technical legal advice, in accordanceconcert with external consultants on accounting principles. In July 2009, Eni’s subsidiary Syndial willfiled

F-83


an appeal against the ruling on Pieve Vergonte siteabovementioned sentence, also requesting suspension of the Districtsentence effectiveness. The Ministry of the Environment, in the appeal filed, requested to the Second Instance Court to adjust the first degree sentence condemning Syndial to the payment of Turin as soon as possible.euro 1,900 million or alternatively euro 1,300 million in addition to the amount assessed by the First Degree Court. In the hearing on December 11, 2009, the Second Instance Court considering the modification of Environmental Damage regulation introduced by the Article 5-bis of the Law Decree No. 135/2009 and following a request of the Board of State lawyers decided the postponement to May 28, 2010, pending the Decree of the Ministry of the Environment related to the determination of the quantification criteria for the monetary compensation of the environmental damage pursuant to the abovementioned Article 5 of the Law Decree 135/2009. The Board of State lawyers committed itself to not examine the sentence until the next hearing. Another administrative proceeding is ongoing regarding a ministerial decree enacted by the Italian Ministry for the Environment. The decree provides that Syndial executes the following tasks: (i) the upgrading of a

F-72


hydraulic barrier to protect the site; and (ii) the design of a project for the environmental remediation of Lake Maggiore. The Administrative Court of Piemonte rejected Syndial’s opposition against the outlined environmental measures requested by the Ministry of the Environment. However, the Court judged the prescriptions of the Ministry regarding the remediation of the site to be plain findings of an environmental enquiry to ascertain the state of the lake. Syndial has filed an appeal against the decision of the Court before an upper degree body, also requesting suspension of the effectiveness of the decision.
The appeal has been put on hold considering that a plan to ascertain the environmental status of the site is going to behas been approved by all interested parties, including the Ministry and local municipalities.municipalities pursuant to the statement on April 28, 2009, which included certain recommendations. Syndial appealed against this statement and the related Ministerial Decree of approval in order to avoid the case to give implicit consent to the request (appealed by the Company) of the Minister that claimed that Syndial is obliged to execute the clean-up. On the contrary, Syndial has agreed on the scope of the plan to ascertain the environmental status of the site, as it has been actually implementing it.
Syndial also presented a clean-up project for the groundwater and the soil, that hasn’t been approved, as the abovementioned prescriptions that have been prescribed are the object of the Company opposition in the abovementioned proceeding. In case Syndial should be found guilty, it would incur remediation and cleanup expenses, actually not quantifiable, that would be offset against any compensation for the environmental damage that Eni’s subsidiary is condemned to pay with regard to civil proceeding pending before the second instance court of Turin.
(v) Action commenced by the Municipality of Carrara for the remediation and reestablishment of previous environmental conditions at the Avenza site and payment of environmental damage.The Municipality of Carrara commenced an action before the Court of Genova requesting Syndial SpA to remediate and restore previous environmental conditions at the Avenza site and the payment of certainunavoidable environmental damage which cannot be cleaned up as well as(amounting to euro 139 million), further damages of various types (e.g. damage to the natural beauty of this site). amounting to euro 80 million as well as damages relating to loss of profit and property amounting to approximately euro 16 million. This request is related to an accident that occurred in 1984, as a consequence of which EniChem Agricoltura SpA (later merged into Syndial SpA), at the time owner of the site, carried out safety and remediation works. The Ministry of the Environment joined the action and requested environmental damage payment – from a minimum of euro 53.5 million to a maximum of euro 93.3 million – to be broken down among the various companies that ran the plant in the past. Syndial summoned Rumianca SpA, Sir Finanziaria SpA and Sogemo SpA, who ran the plant in previous years, in order to be guaranteed. A report produced by an independent expert appointedcharged by the judge was filed with the Court. The findings of this report quantify the residual environmental damage at euro 15 million. With a sentence of March 2008, the Court of Genova rejected all claims made by the Municipality of Carrara and the Ministry of environment.the Environment. Both plaintiffs filed an appeal against this decision in June 2008 requesting to all defendants cumulative damage amounting toconfirming the requests issued in the first judgment degree and a total compensation of euro 189.9189.8 million. Syndial filed in the appeal hearing, disputing the plaintiffs’ claims. The proceeding is underway without any further investigation. The hearing has been postponed to July 2010 for the filing of the pleadings.
(vi) Ministry for the Environment Augusta harbor.The Italian Ministry for the Environment with various administrative acts orderedprescribed companies running plants in the petrochemical site of Priolo to perform safety and environmental remediation works in the Augusta harbor. Companies involved include Eni subsidiaries Polimeri Europa, Syndial and Syndial.Eni R&M. Pollution has been detected in this area primarily due to a high mercury concentration which is allegedly attributed to the industrial activity of the Priolo petrochemical site. Polimeri EuropaThe abovementioned companies opposed said administrative actions, objecting in particular to the way in which remediation works have been designed and information on concentration of pollutants has been gathered. The Regional Administrative Court of Catania with its decision of July the sentence No. 1254/2007 annulled the decision made by the Service Conference of the Ministry of the Environment concerning Priolo and the Augusta harbor.said decisions. The Ministry and the municipalities of Augusta and Melilli filed a claim for the revocation of the decision and requested the suspension of sentence effectiveness with anthe Administrative CourtCouncil of the Sicily Region which accepted the claim. The recommendations which

F-84


the Council’s decision related, have been restated by the Ministry for the Environment with further administrative resolutions that have been appealed by the Eni companies. Again the Regional Administrative Court of Catania reiterated its decision to suspend the effectiveness of the Ministry’s acts.
In January 2008 the Regional Court of Catania accepted two further claims on this matter, remitting to the European Union Court of Justice the correct application of the debated community principle on the matter of environmental responsibility.matter. In June 2008 the Ministry for the Environment and the Municipalities of Melilli and Augusta filed andan appeal against the decision of the Regional Court of Catania with the Administrative Council of the Sicily region, without a resolution of the issue of suspending the effectiveness of the Regional Court’s decisions.
The hearing for the examination of both appeal pending with the Administrative Council of the Sicily Region that has been originally scheduled on December 11, 2008, has been postponed sine die due to preliminary issues pending with the Court of Justice Council. Syndialof the European community.
In April 2008, the Eni companies challenged thecertain administrative acts of December 20, 2007 related to the execution of further clean-up and remediation works of sediments in the Augusta harbor. In this proceeding the Regional Court of Catania has ordered an independent appraiser report, issued on February 20, 2009, that resulted favorable to the objections of the recurring companies. The proceeding is pending.
In May 2008, the Eni companies also challenged with the Regional Court of Catania, requesting the suspension of administrative act effectiveness, certain decisions of an Administrative Body on March 6, 2008 also requesting(and other subsequent decisions). Those decisions were intended to enlarge the scope of the already approved project of environmental remediation and clean-up of the groundwater trough works of physic limitation and the new criteria used by the Administration Body in the restitution of the areas to their legitimate use. With regard to this last proceeding, basing on a request of the appealing companies, the Regional Court of Catania requested the decision of the Court of Justice of the EU to decide on the correct application of the debated community principle. A reviewprinciple, that represent the basis for the all appeals’ decision particularly the principles of the issue made byliability associated with the environmental damage, the proportionality in bearing the expenditures associated with environmental remediation and clean-up, as well as a criteria of reasonableness and diligent execution in remedying an independent consultant has been filed showing evidence supportingenvironmental damage. On March 9, 2010 the thesisEuropean Court gave a sentence that basically represented a favorable outcome for Eni’s subsidiaries involved in the matter. Specifically, the European Court confirmed the community principle of the plaintiffs.liability associated with the environmental damage, whereby central to its correct interpretation is the relation between cause and effect and the identification of the entity that is actually liable for polluting.
It must be noted that the Public prosecutor of Siracusa commenced a criminal action against unknown in order to verify the effective contamination of the Augusta harbor and the connected risks on the execution on the clean-up project proposed by the Ministry. The proceedings are still pending beforetechnical assessment disposed by the Administrative CourtPublic Prosecutor generated the following outcomes: a) no public health risk in the Augusta harbor; b) absence of Lazio.any involvement on part of Eni companies in the contamination; c) drainages dangerousness. Based on those findings, the Public Prosecutor decided to dismiss the proceeding.

ENI SPA
(i)(vii) Reorganization procedure of the airlines companies Volare Group, Volare Airlines and Air Europe.Europe - Prosecuting body: Delegated Commissioner. OnIn March 2009 Eni wasand its subsidiary Sofid (now Eni Adfin) were notified of a bankruptcy claw-back as part of a reorganization procedure filedby the airlines companies Volare Group, Volare Airlines and Air Europe which commenced under the provisions of Ministry of Production Activities, on November 30, 2004. The request regarded the override of all the payments made by those entities to Eni and its subsidiary SofidEni Adfin, as Eni agent for the receivables collection, in the year previous to the insolvency declaration from November 30, 2003 to November 29, 2004, for a total estimated amount of euro 46 million.million plus interest. Eni and Eni Adfin were admitted as defendants and the trial has been postponed to the hearing on May 5, 2010 for the related investigation. Eni accrued a risk provision with respect to this proceeding.

F-73


2. Other judicial or arbitration proceedings

2. Other judicial or arbitration proceedings
SYNDIAL SPA (FORMER ENICHEM SPA)
(i) Serfactoring: disposal of receivables. receivables.In 1991, Agrifactoring SpA commenced proceedings against Serfactoring SpA, a company 49% owned by Sofid SpA and which is controlled by Eni SpA. The claim relates to an amount receivable of euro 182 million for fertilizer sales (plus interest and compensation for inflation), originally owed by Federconsorzi to EniChem Agricoltura SpA (later Agricoltura SpA - in liquidation), and Terni Industrie Chimiche SpA (merged into Agricoltura SpA - in liquidation), that has been(both merged into EniChem SpA (now Syndial SpA)Syndial). Such receivables were transferred by Agricoltura and Terni Industrie Chimiche to Serfactoring, which appointed Agrifactoring as its agent to

F-85


collect payments. Agrifactoring guaranteed to pay the amount of such receivables to Serfactoring, regardless of whether or not it received payment on the due date. Following payment by Agrifactoring to Serfactoring, Agrifactoring was placed in liquidation and the liquidator of Agrifactoring commenced proceedings in 1991 against Serfactoring to recover such payments (equal to euro 182 million) made to Serfactoring based on the claim that the foregoing guarantee became invalid when Federconsorzi was itself placed in liquidation. Agricolturaliquidation, claiming for the reimbursement of the amount paid to Serfactoring and Terni Industrie Chimiche broughtnot liquidated to Agrifactoring by Federconsorzi. Syndial and Serfactoring filed counterclaims against Agrifactoring (in liquidation) for damages amounting to euro 97 million relating to acts carried out by Agrifactoring SpA as agent. The amount of these counterclaims haswas subsequently been reduced to euro 46 million following partial payment of the original receivables by the liquidator of Federconsorzi and various setoffs. These proceedings, which have all been joined,were unitized, were decided with a partial judgment, deposited on February 24, 2004; the request of Agrifactoring has been– that was reduced by an independent accounting consultant to the amount of euro 42.3 million – was rejected and the company has beenwas ordered to pay the sum requested by Serfactoring and damages in favor of Agricoltura,Syndial to be determined following the decision. A final verdict on this issue is pending. Agrifactoring appealed this partial decision requestingand in particular the annulment of the first step judgment, the reimbursement of euro 180 million from Serfactoring along with the rejection of all its claims and the payment of all proceeding expenses. On June 2008, the trial was decided with a partial judgment that, reforming the previous judgment of the Court of Rome, granted the requests of Agrifactoring and condemned Serfactoring to reimburse Agrifactoring the sum paid by the latter to Agrifactoring in liquidation the amount of the receivables due from Federconsorziformer and not collected as Federconsorzi went bankrupt.refunded by Federconsorzi. The Court resolved to appointcharge an independent accounting consultant to quantifywith quantifying the total amount paid by Agrifactoring to Serfactoring and amountsthe amount paid by Federconsorzi to Agrifactoring. The hearing has been rescheduled to February 2010Agrifactoring in order to allowdetermine the Courtsum to reviewbe reimbursed to Agrifactoring.
The proceeding will continue with the recognition of the assessment made by the independent accounting consultant’s advice.consultant. Serfactoring and Syndial and Serfactoring(as precautionary measure, since they have already filed a preliminary appeal) appealed the above mentioned partial sentence of 2008 of the second instance court of Rome with an upper degree Court. Agrifactoring in turn filed counterclaim, requesting the Supreme Courtdeclaration of Appeal. Agrifactoring has presented a counter-recourse.inadmissibility or the rejection of the appeal.. The judgment is still pending. Eni accrued a provision with respect to this proceeding.

ENISAIPEM SPA
(i)Fintermica. Fintermica presented a claim against Eni concerning the management of the Jacorossi joint venture with reference to an alleged abuse of key roles played by Eni SpA in the joint venture, thus damaging the other partner’s interest and the alleged dilatory behavior of Syndial in selling its interest in the joint venture to Fintermica. The parties decided to commence arbitration on the matter. The examining phase is ongoing and an independent assessment of this matter is being executed. The Board of Arbitrators issued a decision on November 26, 2008 condemning Eni and Syndial to compensate Fintermica for the damages suffered amounting to euro 5 million including monetary revaluation and accrued interest as of April 3, 2001.
SNAMPROGETTI SPA
(i)(ii) CEPAV Uno and CEPAV Due. EniSaipem holds interests in the CEPAV Uno (50.36%) and CEPAV Due (52%) consortia that in 1991 signed two contracts with TAV SpA for the construction of two railway tracks for high speed/high capacity trains from Milan to Bologna (under construction) and from Milan to Verona (in the design phase). With regard to the project for the construction of the line from Milan to Bologna, an Addendum to the contract between CEPAV Uno and TAV was signed on June 27, 2003, redefining certain terms and conditions of the contract. Subsequently, the CEPAV Uno consortium requested a time extension for the completion of works and a claim amounting to euro 800 million then increased to euro 1,770 million. CEPAV Uno and TAV failed to solve this dispute amicably. CEPAV Uno opened an arbitration procedure as provided for under terms of the contract on April 27, 2006. The deadline for the submission of the arbitration determination has been scheduled for December 27, 2011. With regard to the project for the construction of a high-speed railway from Milan to Verona, inon December 2004, CEPAV Due presented the final project, prepared in accordance with Law No. 443/2001 on the basis of the preliminary project approved by an Italian governmental authority (CIPE). As concerns the arbitration procedure, commenced on December 28, 2000, requested by CEPAV Due against TAV for the recognition of costs incurred by the Consortium in the 1991-2000 ten-yearten year period from 1991 through 2000 plus damages suffered, damage, in January 2007, the arbitration committee determined the Consortium’s right to recover the costs incurred in connection with the design activities performed. AThe technical independent survey is underway to assess the amount of compensation

F-74


to be awarded to was submitted on October 19, 2009. The trial ended on February 23, 2010 with the Consortium as requested byresolution of the arbitration committee.that condemned TAV appealedto pay to CEPAV Due consortium an amount of euro 44,176,787 plus legal interest and compensation for inflation accrued from the submission of the arbitration committee’s determination. In April 2007,until the Consortiumdate of effective damage payment; the court also condemned TAV to pay euro 1,115,000 plus interest and compensation for inflation accrued from October 30, 2000 until the date of effective damage payment. The resolution has been filed with relevant administrative authorities for its efficacy as per applicable regulations. TAV filed with the second instance court of Rome an appeal against Lawthe partial arbitration committee’s determination of January 2007. The hearing for the examination of the pleadings has been scheduled for January 28, 2011. In February 2007, the Consortium CEPAV Due notified to TAV a second request of arbitration following the Decree No. 7 of December 31, 2007, that revoked the concessions awarded to TAV resulting in the annulment of arrangements signed between TAV and the Consortium to build the high-speed railway section from Milan to Verona. The European Court of Justice was requested to judge on this matter. In the meantime, TAV decided to not request the reimbursement of advances paid to the Consortium. Subsequently, Law 133/2008 re-established the concessions awarded to TAV resulting in the continuation of the arrangements between the consortium CEPAV Due and a new entity in charge of managing the Italian railway system. The second arbitration proceeding, which continued in order to

F-86


  
3. Antitrust, EU Proceedings, Actionsdeterminate the damages suffered by the Consortium even in the period prior to the revocation of the Authorityconcession through an independent appraiser report. The deadline for Electricity and Gas andthe submission of Other Regulatory Authoritiesthe arbitration determination has been scheduled for December 31, 2010.
3.1 Antitrust

3. Antitrust, EU Proceedings, Actions of the Authority for Electricity and Gas and of Other Regulatory Authorities

3.1 Antitrust

ENI SpASPA
(i) Abuse of dominant position of Snam alleged by the Italian Antitrust Authority.Authority. In March 1999, the Italian Antitrust Authority concluded its investigation started in 1997 and: (i) found that Snam SpA (merged in Eni SpA in 2002) abused its dominant position in the market for the transportation and primary distribution of natural gas relating to the transportation and distribution tariffs applied to third parties and the access of third parties to infrastructure; (ii) fined Snam for euro 2 million; and (iii) ordered a review of the practices relating to such abuses. Snam believes it has complied with existing legislation and appealed the decision with the Regional Administrative Court of Lazio requesting its suspension. On May 26, 1999, stating that these decisions are against Law No. 9/1991 and the European Directive 98/30/EC, this Court granted the suspension of the decision. The Authority did not appeal this decision. The decision on the merit of this dispute is still pending before the same Administrative Court.
(ii) Formal assessment commenced by the Commission of the European Communities for the evaluation of alleged participation to activities limiting competitionCommission’s investigations on players active in the fieldnatural gas sector. In the context of paraffin. On April 28, 2005, the Commission of the European Communities commenced a formal assessment to evaluate the alleged participation of Eni and its subsidiaries in activities limiting competition in the field of paraffin. The alleged violation of competition is for: (i) the determination of and increase in prices; (ii) the subdivision of customers; and (iii) exchange of trade secrets, such as production capacity and sales volumes. After, the Commission requested information on Eni’s activities in the field of paraffin and certain documentation acquired by the Commission during an inspection. Eni filed the requested information. On October 2008, the Commission of the European Communities issued the final decision on the matter condemning Eni to the payment of a sanction amounting to euro 29,120,000. Eni has filed for recourse against this decision that is fully covered by the accrued risk provision.
(iii)Ascertainment by the European Commission ofinitiatives aimed at verifying the level of competition in the European natural gas market. As part of its activities to ascertain the level of competition insector within the European natural gas market, with Decision No. C (2006)1920/1 ofUnion, the Commission adopted a decision – notified to Eni in May 5, 2006 – whereby it ordered Eni and all companies solely or jointly controlled by the European Commission informed Eni that the Group companies were subjectlatter to an inquiry undersubmit to inspections pursuant to Article 20, paragraph 4 of the EuropeanCouncil Regulation No. 1/2003 of the Council in order2003. The inspections were intended to verify the possible existence of any business conducts breaching Europeanbehaviors or commercial practices violating EC competition rules in terms of competition and intended to preventaimed at limiting access to the Italian wholesale natural gas wholesale market and to subdivideor at sharing the market among few operatorswith other companies active in the activity of supply andsale or transport of natural gas. Similar actions have been performed byThe Commission undertook similar initiatives with respect to the Commission also againstother largest European players in the main operators in natural gas sector in Germany, France, Austria and Belgium. In April 2007, the European Commission made public its decision to start a further stage of inquiry, as the elements collected supported its suspicion that Eni adopted behaviors leading to "capacity hoarding and strategic, in its view, underinvestment in the transmission system leading to the foreclosure of competitors and harm for competition and customers in one or more supply markets in Italy". On March 9, 2009, Eni received a Statementstatement of Objections relatedobjections by the European Commission relating to a proceeding under Article No. 82 of the EU TreatyEC and Article No. 54 of the SEE agreement with reference toEEA Agreement and concerning an alleged unjustifiableunjustified refusal ofto grant access to the TAG and(Austria), TENP/Transitgas gas(Germany/Switzerland) pipelines, that are interconnectedconnected with the Italian gas transport systemsystem. In particular, according to the Statement of Objections, the alleged refusal to grant access would have been carried out through actions intended to "capacity"capacity hoarding, capacity degradation and strategic limitation of investment" withunderinvestment" and would have had the effect of "hindering"hindering the development of a realeffective competition in the downstream market and [...] harming consumers". In the consumers". The EuropeanStatement of Objections, the Commission envisages the possible imposition upon Eni of structural remedies and a fine, which, if imposed, could be significant. Eni after the completion of the assessment of the allegations set forth by the Commission in Statement of Objections with respect to both the existence of the alleged behaviors and whether they can be properly qualified as infringements of EC competition rules submitted its written reply that was exposed before the representatives of the Commission in November 27, 2009. On February 4, 2010 Eni, reaffirming the legitimacy of its activity, filed with the European Commission a number of structural remedies with a view to resolving the proceeding without the ascertainment of the illicit behavior and consequently without sanctions. Eni has committed to dispose of its interests in the German TENP, in the Swiss Transitgas and in the Austrian TAG gas pipelines. Given the strategic importance of the Austrian Tag pipeline, which transports gas from Russia to Italy, Eni has negotiated a solution with the Commission which calls for the transfer of its stake to an entity controlled by the Italian State. The European Commission has announced its intention to submit those remedies to a market test. According to the results of the market test, the Commission may issue a decision pursuant to Article 9 of Council Regulation No. 1/2003, making the remedies mandatory thus excluding the imposition of any fines upon Eni. In case the Commission, after the performance of the market test, resolves to reject Eni’s remedies, or the Company decides to withdraw those remedies for any reasons, the ordinary antitrust proceeding would resume and in this eventuality an adverse conclusion cannot be excluded, thus resulting in a sentence of conviction including a fine and possibly structural remedies during the course of structural remedies. The Company is currently assessing2010. Eni would in any event be entitled to file an appeal for the reasoning underlyingannulment of such a sentence before the Commission’s objections in order to ascertain whether the challenged actions are supported by evidence and may be qualified as infringement of the European competition rules. The Company will file its defensive memories within the proceeding. In addition, and following the aforementioned assessment, the Company may consider whether to voluntarily file a set of remedies to settle the proceeding as providedEC Courts.

F-75


by Article No. 9 of the European Regulation No. 1/2003. Taking into account the numerous elements to be considered in determining the amount of the fine, the complex checks to carry out with respect to the Statement of Objections, and also the circumstance that the Commission’s approval of the possible remedies, presented by Eni pursuant to European Regulation No. 1/2003, would settle the matter without imposing a fine, management believes that the liability is contingent upon the future events described and cannot be measured with reasonable reliability.
(iv)(iii) TTPC. TTPC.In April 2006, Eni filed a claim before the Regional Administrative Court of Lazio against the decision of the Italian Antitrust Authority of February 15, 2006 stating that Eni’s behavior pertaining to implementations of plans for the upgrading of the TTPC pipeline for importing natural gas from Algeria represented an abuse of dominant position under Article 82 of the European Treaty and fined Eni. The initial fine amounted to euro 390 million and was reduced to euro 290 million in consideration of Eni’s

F-87


commitment to perform actions favoring competition including the upgrade of the gasline. Eni accrued a provision with respect to this proceeding. With a decision filed on November 29, 2006, the Regional Administrative Court of Lazio partially accepted Eni’s claim, annulling such partpartt of the Authority’s decision where the fine was quantified. Eni is waiting for the filing of the motivations of the Court decision to ascertain the impact of said decision. Pending this development, the payment of the fine has been voluntarily suspended. In 2007, the Regional Administrative Court of Lazio accepted in part Eni’s claim and cancelled the quantification of the fine based on the Antitrust Authority’s inadequate evaluation of the circumstances presented by Eni. Eni filed an appeal with the Council of State, as did the Antitrust Authority and TTPC. Pending the final outcome, Eni awaits for the determination of the amount of the fine to be paid.
(v)(iv) Italian naturalAntitrust Authority’s inquiry in the distribution and selling of gas market.in the retail sector. On May 7, 2009, the Italian Antitrust Authority, based on complaints sent by the company Sorgenia, started a preliminary investigation against the Company and its fully-owned subsidiary Italgas and othervarious operators engaging in the gas retail market in Italy.Italy by means of integrated operations in both gas distribution via local low-pressure network and gas marketing to retail customers in urban areas, among them the Company and its fully-owned subsidiary Italgas. The investigation targets an alleged abuse of dominant position in the gas retail market in Italy associated with commercial practices intended to make it difficult for retail clientscustomers consuming less than 200,000 CM/y to change the suppliersupplier. According to the Italian Antitrust Authority, these commercial practices would enable selling companies that belong to integrated group companies to preserve their market shares in the areas operated by group’s distributors. The deadline for the finalization of the preliminary investigation against Eni and the retrieval of data on volumes.Italgas has been scheduled for June 30, 2010.

ENI SPA, POLIMERI EUROPA SPA AND SYNDIAL SPA
(i)(v) Inquiries in relation to alleged anti-competitive agreements in the area of elastomers.elastomers - Prosecuting Body: European Commission. In December 2002, inquiries were commenced concerning alleged anti-competitive agreements in the field of elastomers. These inquiries were commenced concurrently by European and U.S. authorities. At present, proceedings area proceeding is still pending before the European Commission regarding the CR and NBR products. In March 2007, the Commission sent to Eni, Polimeri Europa and Syndial a statement of objections, thus opening the second phase of this proceeding.product. In December 2007, the European Commission dismissed Syndial’s position on CR and imposed on Eni and Polimeri a fine amounting to euro 132.16 million. The two companies have filed an appeal with the EU Court of First Instance against this decision and, at the same time, paid the fine in March 2008. Investigations relating to other elastomers products (BR and SBR) resulted in the ascertainment of Eni having infringed European competition laws in the field of synthetic rubber production (BR and ESBR).laws. On November 29, 2006, the Commission fined Eni and its subsidiary Polimeri Europa for an amount of euro 272.25 million. Eni and its subsidiary filed claims against this decision before the European Court of First Instance in February 2007. The Commission filed a counter appeal.hearings took place in October 2009 and the filing of the Court’s decisions is still pending. Pending the outcome, Polimeri Europa presented a bank guarantee for euro 200 million and paid the residual amount of the fine. In August 2007, with respect to the above mentioned decision of the European Commission, Eni submitted a request for a negative ascertainment with the Court of Milan aimed at proving the non-existence of alleged damages suffered by tire BR/SBR manufacturers. With regard to NBR, an inquiry is underway also inThe Court of Milan declared the U.S., where class actions have alsoappeal inadmissible appealing against a sentence of the District Court of Milan; the related hearing has been commenced. On the federal level, the class action was abandoned by the plaintiffs. However, the federal judge has yet to acknowledge this abandonment. With regard to other products under investigation in the U.S., settlements were reached with both relevant U.S. antitrust authorities and the plaintiffs acting through a class action. Eni recorded a provisionscheduled for these matters.May 2010.

 

3.2 Regulation

TOSCANA ENERGIA CLIENTI SPA
Eni’s subsidiary Toscana Energia Clienti SpA started an action against a customer regarding alleged lack of measurement of gas consumption due to inability to access a measurement facility at the customer’s site, also in connection with the application of Resolution No. 229/2001 of the Italian Authority for Electricity and Gas. This customer has annual consumption in excess of 5,000 CM. The defendant has filed a counter-claim in relation to this proceeding. In the hearing of November 12, 2008 the judge resolved to partially accept the Eni’s subsidiary reasons and to limit compensation to be paid to the defendant to only euro 1,475 with interests amounting to euro 90. The sum was paid while the defendant is evaluating the opportunity to appeal the sentence.

F-76


DISTRIBUIDORA DE GAS CUYANA SA
(i) Toscana Energia Clienti SpA. Eni’s subsidiary Toscana Energia Clienti SpA started an action against a customer regarding alleged lack of measurement of gas consumption due to inability to access a measurement facility at the customer’s site, also in connection with the application of Resolution No. 229/2001 of the Italian Authority for Electricity and Gas. This customer has annual consumption in excess of 5,000 CM. The defendant has filed a counter-claim in relation to this proceeding. During the hearing on November 12, 2008 the judge resolved to partially accept the Eni’s subsidiary reasons and to limit compensation to be paid to the defendant to only euro 1,475 with interests amounting to euro 90. The sum was paid and the defendant in December 2009 filed an appeal against the said decision.
(ii)Distribuidora de Gas Cuyana SA.Formal investigation of the agency entrusted with the regulations for the natural gas market in Argentina. Enargas started a formal investigation on some operators, among them Distribuidora de Gas Cuyana SA, a company controlled by Eni. Enargas stated that the company improperly applied conversion factors to volumes of natural gas invoiced to customers and requested the company to apply the conversion factors imposed by local regulations from the date of the default notification (March 31, 2004) without prejudice to any damage payment and fines that may be

F-88


decided after closing the investigation. In April 2004 the company filed a defensive memorandum. On April 28, 2006, the company formally requested the acquisition of documents from Enargas in order to have access to the documents on which the allegations are based.
(iii)Preliminary investigation of the Authority for Electricity and Gas on the application of the regulation on the issue of the transparency of invoices. On September 25, 2009 the Authority for Electricity and Gas sentenced (sentence VIS 93/2009) to commence a preliminary investigation against 5 marketing companies in the electricity sector, including Eni, to ascertain the eventual violation of the regulation on the issue of the transparency of the invoices (Resolutions 152/2006, 156/2007 and 272/2007) and to eventually inflict administrative monetary penalties.

 

4. Tax Proceedings

ITALY - ENI SPA
(i)Dispute for the omitted payment of the municipal tax related to oil platforms located in territorial waters in the Adriatic Sea. With a formal assessment presented by the Municipality of Pineto (Teramo) in December 1999, Eni SpA has been accused of not having paid a municipal tax on real estate for the period from 1993 to 1998 on four oil platforms located in the Adriatic Sea which constitute municipal waters in front of the coast of Pineto. Eni was requested to pay a total of approximately euro 17 million including interest and a fine. Eni filed a claim against this request stating that the sea where the platforms are located is not part of the municipal territory and the tax application as requested by the municipality lacked objective fundamentals. The claim has been accepted in the first two degrees of judgment at the Provincial and Regional Tax Commissions. However, the Court overturned both judgments, declaring that a municipality can consider requesting a tax on real estate in the sea facing its territory and with the decision of February 2005 sent the proceeding to another section of the Regional Tax Commission in order to judge on the matters of the proceeding. This commission charged an independent consultant with assessing all the accounting/technical aspects of the matter. The independent consultant confirmed that Eni’s offshore installations lack any ground to be subject to the municipal tax that was claimed by the local Municipality. Those findings were accepted by the Regional Tax Commission with a ruling made on January 19, 2009, and filed on December 14, 2009.
Also on December 28, 2005, also the Municipality of Pineto presented similar claims relating to the same Eni platforms for the years 1999 to 2004. The total amount requested was euro 24 million including interest and penalties. Eni filed a claim against this claim which was accepted by the first degree judge with a decision of December 4, 2007. Similar formal assessments related to Eni oil and gas offshore platforms were presented by the Municipalities of Falconara Marittima, Tortoreto, Pedaso, and also from 2009 the Gela Municipality. The total amounts of those claims were approximately euro 7.5 million. The company filed appeal against all those claims. With reference to the formel claims to Eni’s platforms presented by the Municipality of Tortoreto the first degree judge, with a decision of March 1, 2010, accepted the request of Eni.

ENI SPA
Dispute for the omitted payment of the municipal tax related to oil platforms located in territorial waters in the Adriatic Sea.
With a formal assessment presented by the Municipality of Pineto (Teramo) in December 1999, Eni SpA has been accused of not having paid a municipal tax on real estate for the period from 1993 to 1998 on four oil platforms located in the Adriatic Sea which constitute municipal waters in front of the coast of Pineto. Eni was requested to pay a total of approximately euro 17 million including interest and a fine. Eni filed a claim against this request stating that the sea where the platforms are located is not part of the municipal territory and the tax application as requested by the municipality lacked objective fundamentals. The claim has been accepted in the first two degrees of judgment at the Provincial and Regional Tax Commissions. However, the Court overturned both judgments, declaring that a municipality can consider requesting a tax on real estate in the sea facing its territory and with the decision of February 2005 sent the proceeding to another section of the Regional Tax Commission in order to judge on the matters of the proceeding. This commission nominated a Board of Consultants, in order to make all the accounting/technical verifications necessary for the judgment. On December 28, 2005, the Municipality of Pineto presented the same request for the same platforms for the years 1999 to 2004. The total amount requested from Eni is euro 24 million including interest and penalties. Eni filed a claim against this request which was accepted by the first degree judge with a decision of December 4, 2007. Similar formal assessments related to Eni oil and gas offshore platforms were presented by the Municipalities of Falconara Marittima and Pedaso. The total amounts of those claims were approximately euro 6 million. The company filed appeal or is planning to appeal.

OUTSIDE ITALY - AGIP KARACHAGANAK BV
(ii)Claims concerning unpaid taxes and relevant payment of interest and penalties. In July 2004, relevant Kazakh Authorities informed Agip Karachaganak BV and Karachaganak Petroleum Operating BV, shareholder and operator of the Karachaganak contract, respectively, on the final outcome of 2000 to 2003 tax audits. Both companies counterclaimed against the assessment and a preliminary agreement was reached on November 18, 2004. Final assessments have now been issued by the Kazakh Authorities, and payment has been made. The final amount assessed and paid was $39 million net to Eni; this figure included taxes and interest. The companies continue to dispute the assessments and reserve the right to engage in International Arbitration proceedings with the Kazakh Authorities.
In October 2009, Kazakh Tax Authorities conducted a complex tax audit of Agip Karachaganak BV Branch and Karachaganak Petroleum Operating Co BV Branch, for the period 2004-2007.
In December 2009, the tax authorities issued Tax Audit Act and relevant Notification for the year 2004 but so far nothing has been finalized for the later years. The 2004 audit resulted in an assessment of $21.6 million relating to CIT and WHT ($0.3 million). These amounts are disputed and appeals have been submitted to the Higher Level Tax Authority. There is also a dispute in relation to certain unresolved items of expenditure incurred by the operating company Karachaganak Petroleum Operating

AGIP KARACHAGANAK BV
Claims concerning unpaid taxes and relevant payment of interest and penalties.
In July 2004, relevant Kazakh Authorities informed Agip Karachaganak BV and Agip Karachaganak Petroleum Operating Co BV, shareholder and operator of the Karachaganak contract, respectively, on the final outcome of 2000 to 2003 tax audits. Both companies counterclaimed against the assessment and a preliminary agreement was reached on November 18, 2004. Final assessments have now been issued by the Kazakh Authorities, and payment has been made. The final amount assessed and paid was $39 million net to Eni; this figure included taxes and interest. The companies continue to dispute the assessments and reserve the right to challenge their findings further.F-89


BV which has led to the Kazakh Authorities making certain claims against the company on the base of audits performed relating to prior years 2003-2006. Parties are negotiating in order to settle the dispute.
(iii)Tax proceedingEni Angola Production BV. In the first months of 2009 the Ministry of the Finance of Angola, following a fiscal audit commenced at the end of 2007, filed a notice of tax assessment for fiscal years 2002 to 2007 in which it objected to the deductibility of amortization charges recognized on assets in progress related to the payment of the Petroleum Income Tax that was made by Eni Angola Production BV as co-operator of Cabinda concession. The company filed an appeal against this decision with the Provincial Court of Luanda for all the years of the claim. The Court of First Instance declared that it lacked competence in judging the matter. The judgment is still pending before the Supreme Court. Eni accrued a provision with respect to this proceeding.

 

5. Court Inquiries

(i) EniPower.EniPower. In June 2004, the Milan Public Prosecutor commenced inquiries into contracts awarded by Eni’s subsidiary EniPower and on supplies from other companies to EniPower. These inquiries were widely covered by the media. It emerged that illicit payments were made by EniPower suppliers to a manager of EniPower who was immediately dismissed. The Court presented EniPower (commissioning entity) and Snamprogetti (now Saipem SpA) (contractor of engineering and procurement services) with notices of process in accordance with existing laws regulating the administrative responsibility of companies (Legislative Decree No. 231/2001). In its meeting of August 10, 2004, Eni’s Board of Directors examined the aforementioned situation and Eni’s CEO approved the creation of a task force in charge of verifying the compliance with Group procedures regarding the terms and conditions for the signing of supply contracts by EniPower and Snamprogetti and the subsequent execution of works. The Board also

F-77


advised divisions and departments of Eni to cooperate fully in every respect with the Court. From the inquiries performed, no default in the organization emerged, nor deficiency in internal control systems. External experts have performed inquiries with regard to certain specific aspects. In accordance with its transparency and firmness guidelines, Eni will taketook the necessary steps in acting as plaintiff in the expected legal action in order to recover any damage that could have been caused to Eni by the illicit behavior of its suppliers and of their and Eni employees. In the meantime, preliminary investigations have found that both EniPower and Snamprogetti are not to be considered defendants in accordance with existing laws regulating the administrative responsibility of companies (Legislative Decree No. 231/2001). In August 2007, Eni was notified that the Public Prosecutor requested the dismissal of EniPower SpA and Snamprogetti SpA, while the proceeding continues against former employees of these companies and employees and managers of the suppliers under the provisions of Legislative Decree No. 231/2001. Eni SpA, EniPower and Snamprogetti presented themselves as plaintiffs.plaintiffs in the preliminary hearing. In the preliminary hearing related to the main proceeding on April 27, 2009, the judge for the preliminary hearing requested all the parties that have not requested the plea-bargain to stand in trial, excluding Romeo Franco Musazzi and ABB Instrumentation SpA as a result of the statute of limitations. During the hearing on March 2, 2010 the Court confirmed the admission as plaintiffs of Eni SpA, EniPower SpA and Saipem SpA against the inquired parties under the provisions of Legislative Decree No. 231/2001. The trial continues.
(ii) Trading. An investigation is pending regarding two former Eni managers who were allegedly bribed by third parties to favor the closing of certain transactions with two oil product trading companies. Within such investigation, on March 10, 2005, the public prosecutor of Rome notified Eni of two judicial measures for the seizure of documentation concerning Eni’s transactions with the said companies. Eni is acting as plaintiff in this proceeding. The judge for preliminary hearings rejected most of the dismissal request, forcingrequests issued by the public prosecutor. Based on the decision of the judge for preliminary hearings the public prosecutor of Rome notified Eni, as injured party, the summon against two former managers of the company charged of aggravated fraud related to continue with the criminal case.relevant patrimonial damage caused to the injured party through the abuse of working relations and activities. The first hearing took place in March 30, 2010 and the Company established itself as plaintiff. The proceeding is still pending.
(iii) TSKJ Consortium Investigations of the SECby U.S., Italian, and otherOther Authorities. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ), and other authorities are investigating alleged improper payments made bySnamprogetti Netherlands BV has a 25% participation in the TSKJ Consortium to certain Nigerian public officialscompanies. The remaining participations are held in relation toequal shares of 25% by Halliburton/KBR, Technip, and JGC. Beginning in 1994 the TSKJ Consortium was involved in the construction of natural gas liquefaction facilities at Bonny Island in Nigeria. Snamprogetti Netherlands BV had a 25% participation in the TSKJ companies, with the remaining participations held by subsidiaries of Halliburton/KBR, Technip, and JGC. Snamprogetti SpA, the holding company of Snamprogetti Netherlands BV, was a wholly owned subsidiary of Eni until February 2006, when an agreement was entered into for the sale of Snamprogetti to Saipem SpA and Snamprogetti was merged into Saipem as of October 1, 2008. Eni holds a 43% participation in Saipem. In connection with the sale of Snamprogetti to Saipem, Eni agreed to indemnify Saipem for a variety of matters, including potential losses and charges resulting from the investigations into the TSKJ matter.matter referred to below, even in relation to Snamprogetti subsidiaries. The

F-90


U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), and other authorities, including the Public Prosecutor’s office of Milan, are investigating alleged improper payments made by the TSKJ Consortium to certain Nigerian public officials. The proceedings in the U.S.: beginning in June 2004, Eni and Saipem/Snamprogetti voluntarily provided information in response to requests by the SEC and the DOJ in connection with the investigations. In February 2009, KBR and its former parent company, Halliburton, announced that they had reached a settlement with the SEC and DoJthe DOJ with respect to the TSKJ matter as well as other unspecified matters. In connection with the settlement, KBRKBR/Halliburton pleaded guilty to Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) charges, for the conduct stemming from thetheir participation in TSKJ, matter. KBR and Halliburton alsothey have agreed to pay a substantialcriminal fine of $402 million to the DOJ and a civil penalty of $177 million to the SEC. In view of the agreements entered into civil settlementsby KBR/Halliburton with the SEC. We understand thatDOJ and SEC, the DoJ andTSKJ matter could result in legal liability on the SEC believe that representativespart of individuals as well as the other members of the TSKJ Consortium were involvedEntities found in the conduct that gave rise toviolation of the FCPA, charges against KBR. Since June 2004, Eni and Saipem/Snamprogetti have been inthose entities could be subject to substantial fines and the imposition of ongoing measures by the U.S. government to prevent future violations, including potentially a monitor of internal controls, and debarment from government contracts.
In a press release on February 12, 2010, the French company Technip announced, as a result of the circumstances that its discussions with U.S. authorities had intensified over the prior weeks, the recognition of a provision for an amount of euro 245 million reflecting the estimated cost of resolution with such authorities.
As to Eni, discussions with the U.S. authorities have intensified recently. Based on the ongoing status of the discussions, the Company has estimated the cost of a global resolution of the matter with the U.S. authorities and have provided informationrecorded a provision of euro 250 million also considering the contractual obligations assumed by Eni to indemnify Saipem as part of the divestment of Snamprogetti.
The proceedings in response to requestsItaly: beginning in 2004, the TSKJ matter has prompted investigations by various regulators, including the SEC, the DoJ and the Public Prosecutor’s office of Milan against unknown persons. Since March 10, 2009, the Company has received requests of exhibition of documents from the Public Prosecutor’s office of Milan. On July 17, 2009, the date on which a search and attachment warrant was served on Saipem/Snamprogetti, the Public Prosecutor’s office of Milan indicated to the company that it is investigating one or more people, including at least one former manager of Snamprogetti; previously, as far as the company knew, none of its employees or former employees was under formal investigation. The events under investigation cover the period since 1994 and also concern the period of time subsequent to the June 8, 2001 enactment of Italian Legislative Decree No. 231 concerning the liability of legal entities. A violation of Legislative Decree June 8, 2001, No. 231 can result in connectionthe confiscation of criminal profits in addition to administrative penalties. During the preliminary investigations, the preventive attachment of such profits and other precautionary measures are possible. On July 31, 2009, a decree issued by the Judge for Preliminary Investigation at the Court of Milan was served on Saipem SpA (as legal entity incorporating Snamprogetti SpA). The decree set for September 22, 2009 a hearing in Court in relation to a proceeding ex Legislative Decree No. 231 of June 8, 2001 whereby the Public prosecutor of Milan is investigating Eni SpA and Saipem SpA for liability of legal entities arising from offences involving international corruption charged to two former managers of Snamprogetti SpA. The Public Prosecutor of Milan requested Eni SpA and Saipem SpA to be debarred from activities involving – directly or indirectly – any agreement with the investigations.Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation and its subsidiaries. The above mentioned hearing allowed Eni and Saipem to their own defenses before any decision was made on the requested disqualification. The events referred to the request of precautionary measures of the Public Prosecutor of Milan cover TSKJ Consortium practices during the period from 1995 to 2004. In this regard, the Public Prosecutor claims the inadequacy and violation of the organizational, management and control Model adopted to prevent those offences charged to people subject to direction and supervision. At the time of the events under investigation, the Company had adopted a code of practice and internal procedures with reference to the best practices at the time. Subsequently, such code and internal procedures have been improved aiming at the continuous improvement of internal controls. Furthermore, on March 14, 2008 Eni approved a new Code of Ethics and a new Model 231 reaffirming that the belief that one is acting in favor or to the advantage of Eni can never, in any way, justify – not even in part – any behaviors that conflict with the principles and contents of the Code. Since April 23, 2009, with regard to investigations on the TSKJ matter the Company’s Board of Directors has timely recalled the analysis of the existing internal procedures against corruption, in order to implement any upgrading to be possibly needed, and to continue the cooperation with the relevant authorities and also resolved to promote all legal measures for protecting the Company’s interests and reputation, in the event the responsibility of its employees or collaborators is verified. The jury room of September 22, 2009 was postponed to the hearing of October 21, 2009 when the judge for the preliminary investigation rejected the request of precautionary measures of disqualification filed by the Public Prosecutor of Milan against Eni and Saipem. The Public Prosecutor of Milan appealed the decision of the Judge for Preliminary Investigation. The hearing for the review of the appeal, scheduled initially for January 20, 2010 was moved up, through a measure communicated to the defense on January 12, 2010, on January

F-91


19, 2010 when the Judge of Re-examination dismissed as unfounded the appeal of the Public Prosecutor. In February 19, 2010 the Public Prosecutor of Milan filed an appeal with the Third Instance Court, asking for the cancellation of the abovementioned decision of the Judge of Re-examination. At the same time on February 11, 2010 the Public Prosecutor of Milan requested, according to Article 248 of Penal Code the collection of documentation and information related to companies participated by Eni SpA and Saipem SpA (former Snamprogetti SpA) involved in the Bonny Island project.
(iv) Gas Metering. Metering.On May 28, 2007, a seizure order (in respect to certain documentation) was served upon Eni and other Group companies as part of a proceeding brought by the Public Prosecutor at the Courts of Milan. The order was also served upon five top managers of the Group companies in addition to third party companies and their top managers. The investigation alleges behavior which breaches Italian criminal law, starting from 2003, regarding the use of instruments for measuring gas, the related payments of excise duties and the billing of clients as well as relations with the Supervisory Authorities. The allegation regards, interalia,inter alia, the offense contemplated by Legislative Decree of June 8, 2001, No. 231, which establishes the liability of the legal entity for crimes committed by its employee in the interests of such legal entity, or to its advantage. Accordingly, notice of the commencement of investigations was served upon Eni Group companies (Eni, Snam Rete Gas and Italgas) as well as third party companies. On November 26, 2009 a notice of conclusion of the preliminary investigation was served to Eni’s Group companies whereby 14 Eni employees, also including former employees, are under investigation. The exceptions filed in the notice include: (i) violations pertaining to recognition and payment of certain amounts of the excise on natural gas; (ii) violations or failure in submitting the annual statement of gas consumption and/or in the annual declarations to be filed with the Duty Authority or the Authority for Electricity and Gas; and (iii) a related obstacle which has been allegedly posed to the monitoring functions performed by the Authority for Electricity and Gas. Based on information reported by the press on March 9, 2010, it has been disseminated that the Public Prosecutor of Milan requested that a number of investigated Eni’s employees and former employees would stand trial.
On February 23, 2010 Eni, Snam Rete Gas and Italgas received a notification requesting the collection of documents related to procedures of constitution, definition, update and implementation of Model 231 in the period from 2003 to 2008.
The Group companies are cooperating with the Supervising Authorities in the investigations.
(v) Agip KCO NV.NV. In November 2007, the public prosecutor of Kazakhstan informed Agip KCO of the start of an inquiry for an alleged fraud in the award of a contract to the Overseas International Constructors GmbH in 2005.
(vi)Kazakhstan. On October 1, 2009 the Public Prosecutor of Milan requested a number of documents pursuant to Article 248 of the Penal code. Through this decision, part of a criminal proceeding against unknown parties, Eni SpA was requested to transmit – in relation to the alleged international corruption, embezzling pillage, and other crimes – audit reports and other documentation related to anomalies and critical issues on the management of: the Karachaganak plant; and the Kashagan project. The crime of "international corruption" mentioned in the said request of transmission of documents is sanctioned, in addition to the Italian criminal code, by Legislative Decree June 8, 2001 No. 231 which establishes the administrative responsibility of companies for crimes committed by their employees on their behalf. Eni commenced the collection of the documentation in order to rapidly fulfill the requests of the Public Prosecutor. The company has deposited in different phases the documents collected. The Company continues to fully collaborate with the Public Prosecutor providing also further documentation when available.

 

6. Settled Proceedings

(i)Preliminary investigation of the Authority for Electricity and Gas about application of the "K" conversion factors for volumes adjustments. In May 2009 the Authority for Electricity and Gas, based on evidence collected during certain inspections and subsequent requests of information, communicated to the Company the results of an inquiry that stated that the company improperly applied the conversion factor "K" for natural gas volumes accounting at a number of Eni’s delivery points. The company filed its conclusions in a defensive memorandum, objecting to the Authority’s findings. On the basis of a comparative evaluation of the sanctions imposed at the end of analogous inquiries commenced against other gas companies, Eni accrued a risk provision with respect to this proceeding. On October 5, 2009 the Authority for Electricity and Gas with sentence VIS 94/2009 upheld partially Eni’s objections and recognized that the obligation to apply the "K" conversion index for marketing companies as determined by the distribution companies was effective from 2004 as opposed to the year 2001 as initially stated by the Authority for Electricity and Gas. This decision determined in one case the ceasing of the

ENI SPA
Inquiry of the Italian Authority for Electricity and Gas regarding information to clients about the right to pay amounts due for natural gas sales in installments.
With Decision No. 228/2007, the Italian Authority for Electricity and Gas commenced a formal inquiry regarding information to clients about the right to pay amounts due

F-78F-92


infringement as well as the reduction of the liability and associated duration in all the other cases. The Authority for Electricity and Gas imposed a fine amounting to euro 1,023,000 on Eni that was fully covered by the accrued risk provision. Eni paid the sanction even if the Company considers its motivations to be well grounded in the appeal proposed against the Authority for Electricity and Gas findings before the Administrative Court in December 2009.
(ii)Formal assessment commenced by the Commission of the European Communities for the evaluation of alleged participation to activities limiting competition in the field of paraffin. On April 28, 2005, the Commission of the European Communities commenced a formal assessment to evaluate the alleged participation of Eni and its subsidiaries in activities limiting competition in the field of paraffin. The alleged violation of competition is for: (i) the determination of an increase in prices; (ii) the subdivision of customers; and (iii) exchange of trade secrets, such as production capacity and sales volumes. After, the Commission requested information on Eni’s activities in the field of paraffin and certain documentation acquired by the Commission during an inspection, Eni filed the requested information. In October 2008, the Commission of the European Communities issued the final decision on the matter condemning Eni to the payment of a sanction amounting to euro 29,120,000. Eni paid the fine which was fully covered by the accrued risk provision, filing however for recourse against this decision.
(iii)Alleged unauthorized waste management activities - EniPower. In 2004, the public prosecutor of Rovigo commenced an investigation for alleged crimes related to unauthorized waste management activities in Loreo relating to the samples of soil used during the construction of the new EniPower power station in Mantova. The prosecutor requested the CEO of EniPower and the managing director of the Mantova plant at the time of the alleged crime to stand trial. In the hearing on April 6, 2009 the judge dismissed the accusation as a result of the statute of limitations.

for the natural gas sales in installments in order to possibly put a stop to the alleged infringement of the clients’ rights and to impose a fine. In April 2008, the Authority concluded its inquiry and fined the Company by euro 3.2 million.

SYNDIAL SPA (FORMER ENICHEM SPA)
Criminal action commenced by the public prosecutor of Brindisi.
In 2000, the public prosecutor of Brindisi commenced a criminal action against 68 persons who are employees or former employees of companies that owned and managed plants for the manufacture of dichloroethane, vinyl chloride monomer and vinyl polychloride from the early 1960s to date, some of which were managed by EniChem from 1983 to 1993. At the end of the preliminary investigation the public prosecutor asked for the dismissal of the case in respect of the employees and the managers of EniChem. Plaintiffs presented oppositions, but the prosecutor confirmed the request to dismiss the case with a decision of June 2008, the public prosecutor dismissed the accusation as unfounded and requested the closing of the proceeding.

AGIP KCO NV
In December 2007 the Kazakh tax authority filed a notice of tax assessment for fiscal years 2004 to 2006 to Agip KCO, operator of the Kashagan contract. Allegedly unpaid taxes, including interest and penalties, amounted to approximately U.S. $235 million net to Eni and related to unpaid amounts and inapplicable deductions on value added tax and the default in applying certain withholding taxes on payments to foreign suppliers. The same notice also informed the companies party to the Kashagan contract that further assessments were pending on non-deductible costs for U.S. $188 million net Eni and higher taxable income on Kazakh branches for U.S. $48 million net to Eni. The further assessments were subsequently issued, the company filed an appeal and a settlement was reached in October 2008 with the following outcome: the unpaid taxes net to Eni were agreed at U.S. $24 million (U.S. $235 million assessed). An adjustment to deductible costs was agreed at U.S. $38 million net to Eni (U.S. $188 million assessed) and it was further agreed that there would be no income taxable on Kazakh branches (U.S. $48 million assessed).

Other risks and commitments
Parent company guarantees amounted to euro 11,110 million (euro 4,911 million at December 31, 2006) were issued in connection with certain contractual commitments for hydrocarbon exploration and production activities, quantified on the basis of the capital expenditures to be incurred. The increase of euro 6,199 million primarily related to commitments that Agip Caspian Sea BV in Kazakhstan had entered into for euro 5,605 million.

Under the convention signed on October 15, 1991 by Treno Alta Velocità - TAV SpA and CEPAV (Consorzio Eni per l’Alta Velocità) Due, Eni committed to guarantee the execution of design and construction of the works assigned to the CEPAV Consortium (to which it is party) and guaranteed to TAV the correct and timely execution of all obligations indicated in the convention in a subsequent integration deed and in any further addendum or change or integration to the same. The regulation of CEPAV Due contains the same obligations and guarantees contained in the CEPAV Uno Agreement.

A commitment entered into by Eni USA Gas Marketing Llc on behalf of Cameron LNG for fulfilling certain obligations in connection with a regasification contract signed on August 1, 2005. This commitment is subject to a suspension clause and will come into force when the regasification service starts in a period included between October 1, 2008 and June 30, 2009 for an estimated total consideration of euro 226 million.

A commitment entered into by Eni USA Gas Marketing Llc on behalf of Gulf LNG Energy for the acquisition of unused regasification capacity (5.78 BCM/y) over a twenty-year period (2011-2031) for an estimated total consideration as high as $1,400 million equal to euro 951 million.

A commitment entered into by Eni USA Gas Marketing Llc on behalf of Angola LNG Supply Service for the acquisition of regasified gas at the Pascagoula plant in the United States that will come into force when the regasification service starts in a period included between 2011-2031.

Eni is liable for certain non-quantifiable risks related to contractual assurances given to acquirers of certain of Eni’s assets, including businesses and investments, against certain contingent liabilities deriving from tax, social security contributions, environmental issues and other matters applicable to periods during which such assets were

F-79


operated by Eni. Eni believes such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and liquidity.

Assets under concession arrangements


Eni operates under concession arrangements mainly in the Exploration & Production segment and in some activities of the Gas & Power segment and the Refining & Marketing segment. In the Exploration & Production segment contractual clauses governing mineral concessions, licenses and exploration permits regulate the access of Eni to hydrocarbon reserves. Such clauses can differ in each country. In particular, mineral concessions, licenses and permits are granted by the legal owners and, generally, entered into with government entities, State oil companies and, in some legal contexts, private owners. As a compensation for mineral concessions, Eni pays royalties and taxes in accordance with local tax legislation. Eni sustains all the operation risks and costs related to the productionexploration and development activities and it is entitled to the productions realized. In ProductProduction Sharing Agreement and in buy-back contracts, realized productions are defined on the basis of contractual agreements drawn up with State oil companies which hold the concessions. Such contractual agreements regulate the recoverrecovery of costs incurred for the exploration, development and operating activities (cost oil) and give entitlement to the ownretained portion of the realized productions (profit oil). With reference to natural gas storage in Italy, the activity is conducted on the basis of concessions with a duration that does not exceed a twenty year durationyears and it is granted by the Ministry of Productive Activities to persons that are consistent with legislation requirements and that can demonstrate to be able to conduct a storage program that meets the public interest in accordance with the laws. In the Gas & Power segment the gas distribution activity is primarily conducted on the basis of concessions granted by local public entities. At the expiryexpiration date of the concession, compensation is paid, defined by using criteria of business appraisal, to the outgoing operator following the sale of its own gas distribution network. Service tariffs for distribution are defined on the basis of a method established by the Authority for Electricity and Gas. Legislative Decree No. 164/2000 provides the grant of distribution service exclusively by tender, with a maximum length of 12 years.

In the Refining & Marketing segment several service stations and other auxiliary assets of the distribution service are located in the motorway areas and they are granted by the motorway concession operators following a public tender for the sub-concession of the supplying of oil products distribution service and other auxiliary services. Such assets are amortized over the length of the concession (generally, 5 years for Italy). In exchange of the granting of the services described above, Eni provides to the motorway companies fixed and variable royalties on the basis of quantities sold. At the end of the concession period, all non-removable assets are transferred to the grantor of the concession.

Environmental regulations


Risks associated with the footprint of Eni’s activities on the environment, health and safety are described in the risk section above, under the paragraph "Operational risks". Regarding In the future, Eni will sustain significant expenses in relation to compliance with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations and for reclaiming, safety and remediation works of areas previously used for industrial production and dismantled sites. In particular, regarding

F-93


the environmental risk, management does not currently expect any material adverse effect upon Eni’s consolidated financial statements,Consolidated Financial Statements, taking account of ongoing remedial actions, existing insurance policies to cover environmental risks and the environmental risk provision accrued in the consolidated financial statements.Consolidated Financial Statements. However, management believes that it is possible that Eni may incur material losses and liabilities in future years in connection with environmental matters due to: (i) the possibility of as yet unknown contamination; (ii) the results of the ongoing surveys and the other possible effects of statements required by Decree No. 471/1999 of the Ministry of Environment; (iii) new developments in environmental regulation; (iv) the effect of possible technological changes relating to future remediation; and (v) the possibility of litigation and the difficulty of determining Eni’s liability, if any, as against other potentially responsible parties with respect to such litigation and the possible insurance recoveries.

Emission trading


Legislative Decree No. 216 of April 4, 2006 implemented the Emission Trading Directive 2003/87/EC concerning greenhouse gas emissions and Directive 2004/101/EC concerning the use of carbon credits deriving from projects for the reduction of emissions based on the flexible mechanisms devised by the Kyoto Protocol. This European emission trading scheme has been in force since January 1, 2005, and on this matter, on November 27, 2008, the National Committee for Emissions Trading Scheme (Ministry of Environment-Mse) published the Resolution 20/2008 defining emission permits for the 2008-2012 period. In particular,

Eni was assigned permits corresponding to 127.2126.4 mmtonnes of carbon dioxide (approximately 25 mmtonnes/y)(of which, 25.8 in 2008, 25.8 in 2009, 25.1 in 2010, 25.0 in 2011, 24.7 in 2012) and in addition to approximately 7.48.6 million of permits expected to be assigned with respect to new plants in the five-year period 2008-2012. Emissions of carbon dioxide from Eni’s plants were lower than permits assigned in 2008. Emission permits for 25.9

F-80


million tonnes were assigned, against2009. Against emissions of carbon dioxide amounting to approximately 24.8 mmtonnes, emission permits amounting to 25.9 mmtonnes were assigned, determining a 1.1 mmtonnes surplus. In addition to such surplus, a 0.3 mmtonnes of approximately 25.3 million tonnes, resultingpermits (an increase in athe availability of Eni) are to be included following the contract of Virtual Power Plan GDF Suez Energia Italia, primarily assigned to cover the emissions of the EniPower plants. For this reason, the total surplus of 0.6 million tonnes.

amounted to about 1.4 mmtonnes.



3029 Revenues

The following is a summary of the main components of "Revenues". For more information about changes in revenues, see "Item 5 – Operating and Financial Review and Prospects".

Net sales from operations were as follows:

(euro million) 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
Net sales from operations 85,957 87,103 107,843
Change in contract work in progress 148 153 305
  86,105 87,256 108,148
(euro million) 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
Net sales from operations 87,051  107,777  83,519 
Change in contract work in progress 153  305  (292)
  87,204  108,082  83,227 
  
 
 

F-94


Net sales from operations were net of the following items:

(euro million) 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
Excise taxes 13,762 13,292 13,142
Exchanges of oil sales (excluding excise taxes) 2,750 2,728 2,694
Services billed to joint venture partners 1,385 1,554 2,081
Sales to service station managers for sales billed to holders of credit cards 1,453 1,480 1,700
Exchanges of other products 127 121 83
  19,477 19,175 19,700
(euro million) 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
Excise taxes 13,292 13,142 12,122
Exchanges of oil sales (excluding excise taxes) 2,728 2,694 1,680
Services billed to joint venture partners 1,554 2,081 2,435
Sales to service station managers for sales billed to holders of credit cards 1,480 1,700 1,531
Exchanges of other products 121 83 55
  19,175 19,700 17,823
  
 
 

Net sales from operations by business segment and geographic area of destination are presented in Note 36 -35 – Information by industrybusiness segment and geographic financial information.

Other income and revenues
Other income and revenues were as follows:

(euro million) 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
Gains on price adjustments under overlifting/underlifting transactions 30 79 180
Lease and rental income 98 95 98
Gains from sale of assets 100 66 48
Contract penalties and other trade revenues 61 181 23
Compensation for damages 40 87 15
Other proceeds (*) 454 319 356
  783 827 720
(euro million) 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
Gains from sale of assets 66  48  306 
Lease and rental income 95  98  100 
Compensation for damages 87  15  54 
Contract penalties and other trade revenues 181  23  31 
Gains on price adjustments under overlifting/underlifting transactions 79  180  148 
Other proceeds (*) 325  364  479 
  833  728  1,118 
  
 
 
   
(*) Each individual amount included herein does not exceed euro 50 million.

F-81


Gains from sale of assets amounted to euro 306 million of which euro 283 million related to the Exploration & Production segment.


3130 Operating expenses

The following is a summary of the main components of "Operating expenses". For more information about changes in operating expenses see "Item 5 – Operating and Financial Review and Prospects".

Purchases,F-95


Purchase, services and other
Purchases,
Purchase, services and other included the following:

(euro million) 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
Production costs - raw, ancillary and consumable materials and goods 44,661  44,884  58,712 
Production costs - services 10,015  10,828  13,355 
Operating leases and other 1,903  2,276  2,558 
Net provisions for contingencies 767  591  900 
Other expenses 1,089  1,095  1,652 
  58,435  59,674  77,177 
less:         
- capitalized direct costs associated with self-constructed assets - tangible assets (783) (1,325) (645)
- capitalized direct costs associated with self-constructed assets - intangible assets (162) (170) (124)
  57,490  58,179  76,408 
(euro million) 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
Production costs - raw, ancillary and consumable materials and goods 44,850  58,662  40,311 
Production costs - services 10,828  13,355  13,520 
Operating leases and other 2,276  2,558  2,567 
Net provisions for contingencies 573  884  1,055 
Other expenses 1,101  1,660  1,527 
  59,628  77,119  58,980 
less:         
- capitalized direct costs associated with self-constructed assets - tangible assets (1,357) (680) (576)
- capitalized direct costs associated with self-constructed assets - intangible assets (138) (89) (53)
  58,133  76,350  58,351 
  
 
 

Production costs-services included brokerage fees related to Engineering & Construction segment forin the amount of euro 79 million (euro 37 million and euro 155 million (euro 39 millionfor the years ended December 31, 2007 and euro 37 million in 2006 and 2007,2008, respectively).

Costs incurred in connection with research and development activity recognized in the profit and loss account amounted to euro 216207 million (euro 219189 million and euro 189216 million in 2006for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2007,2008, respectively) as they do not meet the requirements to be capitalized.

The item "Operating leases and other" included operating leases forin the amount of euro 1,220 million (euro 1,081 million and euro 957 million (euro 860 millionfor the years ended December 31, 2007 and euro 1,081 million in 2006 and 2007,2008, respectively) and royalties on hydrocarbons extracted forin the amount of euro 641 million (euro 772 million and euro 871 million (euro 823 millionfor the years ended December 31, 2007 and euro 772 million in 2006 and 2007,2008, respectively). Future minimum lease payments expected to be paid under non-cancelablenon-cancellable operating leases were as follows:

(euro million) 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
To be paid within 1 year 594 588 618
Between 2 and 5 years 1,474 1,401 2,585
Beyond 5 years 762 942 1,084
  2,830 2,931 4,287
(euro million) 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
To be paid within 1 year 588  618  886 
Between 2 and 5 years 1,401  2,585  2,335 
Beyond 5 years 942  1,084  1,034 
  2,931  4,287  4,255 
  
 
 

Operating leases primarily concernedrelate to assets for drilling activities, time charter and long-term rentals of vessels, lands, service stations and office buildings. Such leases did not include renewal options. There are no significant restrictions provided by these operating leases which limit the ability of Eni to pay dividends, use assets or to take on new borrowings.

Increase of provisions for contingencies net of reversal of unutilized provisions amounted to euro 8741,055 million (euro 767573 million and euro 591884 million in 2006for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2007,2008, respectively) and mainly regarded environmental risks for euro 360 million (euro 248 million and euro 327 million in 2006 and 2007, respectively), marketing initiatives awarding prizesrelated to clients for euro 73 million (euro 44 million and euro 59 million in 2006 and 2007, respectively) and legal or other proceedings forin the amount of euro 333 million (euro 79 million and euro 55 million for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively) and environmental risks in the amount of euro 258 million (euro 149327 million and euro 79360 million in 2006for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2007,2008, respectively). More information is included in Note 22 -21 – Provisions for contingencies.

F-82F-96


Payroll and related costs
Payroll and related costs were as follows:

(euro million) 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
Wages and salaries 2,630  2,906  3,204 
Social security contributions 691  690  694 
Cost related to defined benefits plans and defined contributions plans 230  161  107 
Other costs 305  275  282 
  3,856  4,032  4,287 
less:         
- capitalized direct costs associated with self-constructed assets - tangible assets (99) (109) (148)
- capitalized direct costs associated with self-constructed assets - intangible assets (107) (123) (135)
  3,650  3,800  4,004 
(euro million) 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
Wages and salaries 2,906  3,204  3,330 
Social security contributions 690  694  706 
Cost related to defined benefits plans and defined contributions plans 161  107  137 
Other costs 275  282  342 
  4,032  4,287  4,515 
less:         
- capitalized direct costs associated with self-constructed assets - tangible assets (184) (235) (280)
- capitalized direct costs associated with self-constructed assets - intangible assets (48) (48) (54)
  3,800  4,004  4,181 
  
 
 

Average number of employees
The average number and break-down of employees by category of Eni’s subsidiaries were as follows:

(number) 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
Senior managers 1,676 1,594 1,621
Junior managers 11,142 11,816 12,597
Employees 34,671 35,725 36,766
Workers 25,426 25,582 26,387
  72,915 74,717 77,371
(euro million) 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
Senior managers 1,594  1,621  1,653 
Junior managers 11,816  12,597  13,255 
Employees 35,725  36,766  37,207 
Workers 25,582  26,387  26,533 
  74,717  77,371  78,648 
  
 
 

The average number of employees was calculated as the average between the number of employees at the beginning and end of the respective period. The average number of senior managers includedinclude managers employed and operating in foreign countries, whose position is comparable to that of a senior manager status.manager.

Stock-based compensation

Stock grantoption
In 2008 residual rights for2009, Eni suspended the incentive plan based on the stock grant were exercised byoption assignment to managers of Eni SpA and its subsidiaries as defined in Article 23592359. The following is the information about the residual plans of past periods.

As of December 31, 2009 19,482,330 options were outstanding for the Civil Codepurchase of 19,482,330 Eni ordinary shares (nominal value euro 1 each). The break-down of outstanding options are as eligible to this compensation plan. Therefore at the balance sheet date there are not residual rights granted. Changes in the 2006, 2007 and 2008 stock grant plans consisted of the following:follows:

  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
  

NumberRights outstanding
as of sharesDec. 31, 2009

MarketAverage strike price (a) (euro)

Number of shares

Market price (a) (euro)

Number of shares

Market price (a) (euro)

  
 




Stock grants outstanding as of January 1 

3,127,200

  

23.460

 

1,873,600

  

25.520

 

902,800

  

25.120

New rights granted               
Rights exercised in the period 

(1,236,400

) 

23.933

 

(966,000

) 

24.652

 

(893,400

) 

21.832

Rights cancelled in the period 

(17,200

) 

23.338

 

(4,800

) 

26.972

 

(9,400

) 

22.683

Stock grants outstanding as of December 31 

1,873,600

  

25.520

 

902,800

  

25.120

     
of which exercisable at December 31 

156,700

  

25.520

 

68,100

  

25.120

     
Stock option plan 2002 97,000 15.216
Stock option plan 2003 229,900 13.743
Stock option plan 2004 671,600 16.576
Stock option plan 2005 3,281,500 22.512
Stock option plan 2006 3,018,155 23.119
Stock option plan 2007 5,144,050 27.451
Stock option plan 2008 7,040,125 22.540
  19,482,330  
  
 




(a)Market price relating to new rights granted, rights exercised in the period and rights cancelled in the period corresponds to the average market value (arithmetic average of official prices recorded on Mercato Telematico Azionario in the month preceding: (i) the date of the Board of Directors resolution regarding the stock grant assignment; (ii) the date on which the emission/transfer of the shares granted were recorded in the grantee’s securities account; and (iii) the date of the unilateral termination of employment for rights cancelled), weighted with the number of shares. Market price of stock at the beginning and end of the year is the price recorded at December 31.

F-83


Stock option
Stock options plans are designed for managersAs of Eni SpA and its subsidiaries as defined in Article 2359December 31, 2009 the weighted-average remaining contractual life of the Civil Code, who are directly responsible for corporate results or for strategic positions, making them participate to an effective incentive plan.plans at December 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 plans were 7 months, 1 years and 7 months, 2 years and 7 months, 3 years and 7 months, 2 years and 7 months, 3 years and 7 months and 4 years and 7 months, respectively.

2002-2004 and 2005 plans
Stock options plans provide the right for the assignee to purchase treasury shares with a 1 to 1 ratio after the end of the third year from the date of the grant (vesting period) and for a maximum period of five years. The strike price was determined to be the arithmetic average of official prices registered on the Mercato Telematico Azionario in the month preceding the grant date or, from 2003 onwards, the average carrying amount of treasury shares as of the day preceding the assignment, if greater.F-97


2006-2008 plan
The 2006-2008 stock option plan hasplans have introduced a performance condition for the exercise of the options. At the end of each three-year period (vesting period) from the assignment, the Board of Directors determines the percentage of exercisable options, from 0 to 100, in relation to the Total Shareholders’ Return (TSR) of Eni’s shares as benchmarked against the TSR delivered by a panel of the six largest international oil companies for market capitalization. Options can be exercised after three years from the assignment (vesting period) and for a maximumminimum period of three years. The strike price is calculated as thean arithmetic average of official prices registered on the Mercato Telematico Azionario in the month preceding the assignment.

At December 31, 2008, 23,557,425 options were outstanding for the purchase of 23,557,425 ordinary shares. The break-down of outstanding options was the following:

Rights outstanding
as of December 31

Average strike price (euro)



Stock option plan 2002 97,000 15.216
Stock option plan 2003 231,900 13.743
Stock option plan 2004 671,600 16.576
Stock option plan 2005 3,756,000 22.512
Stock option plan 2006 5,954,250 23.119
Stock option plan 2007 5,492,375 27.451
Stock option plan 2008 7,354,300 22.540
  23,557,425  


At December 31, 2008 the weighted-average remaining contractual life of the plans at December 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 was 1 year and 7 months, 2 years and 7 months, 3 years and 7 months, 4 years and 7 months, 3 years and 7 months, 4 years and 7 months and 5 years and 7 months, respectively.

ChangesIn 2009, changes of stock option plans in 2006, 2007 and 2008 consisted of the following:carry-over of the previous plans. The following table summarizes these changes:

  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
  

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
  

Number
of shares

 

Average strike price (euro)

 

Market price (a) (euro)

 

Number
of shares

 

Average strike price (euro)

 

Market price (a) (euro)

 

Number
of shares

 

Average strike price (euro)

 

Market price (a) (euro)

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Stock options as of January 1 

13,379,600

 

17.705

 

23.460

 

15,290,400

 

21.022

 

25.520

 

17,699,625

 

23.822

 

25.120

Rights outstanding as of January 1 15,290,400  21.022 25.520 17,699,625  23.822 25.120 23,557,425  23.540 16.556
New rights granted 

7,050,000

 

23.119

 

23.119

 

6,128,500

 

27.451

 

27.447

 

7,415,000

 

22.540

 

22.538

 6,128,500  27.451 27.447 7,415,000  22.540 22.538       
Rights exercised in the period 

(4,943,200

) 

15.111

 

23.511

 

(3,028,200

) 

16.906

 

25.338

 

(582,100

) 

17.054

 

24.328

 (3,028,200) 16.906 25.338 (582,100) 17.054 24.328 (2,000) 13.743 16.207
Rights cancelled in the period 

(196,000

) 

19.119

 

23.797

 

(691,075

) 

24.346

 

24.790

 

(975,100

) 

24.931

 

19.942

 (691,075) 24.346 24.790 (975,100) 24.931 19.942 (4,073,095) 13.374 14.866
Stock options outstanding as of December 31 

15,290,400

 

21.022

 

25.520

 

17,699,625

 

23.822

 

25.120

 

23,557,425

 

23.540

 

16.556

Rights outstanding as of December 31 17,699,625  23.822 25.120 23,557,425  23.540 16.556 19,482,330  23.576 17.811
of which exercisable at December 31 

1,622,900

 

16.190

 

25.520

 

2,292,125

 

18.440

 

25.120

 

5,184,250

 

21.263

 

16.556

 2,292,125  18.440 25.120 5,184,250  21.263 16.556 7,298,155  21.843 17.811
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
(a)  Market price relating to new rights granted, rights exercised in the period and rights cancelled in the period corresponds to the average market value (arithmetic average of official prices recorded on Mercato Telematico Azionario in the month preceding: (i) the date of the Board of Directors resolution regarding the stock grantsgrant assignment; (ii) the date inon which the emission/transfer of the shares granted waswere recorded in the grantee’sgrantee��s securities account; and (iii) the date in whichof the unilateral termination of employment for rights was cancelled), weighted with the number of shares. Market price of stock at the beginning and end of the year is the price recorded at December 31.

F-84


The fair value of stock options granted during the years 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 was euro 5.39, euro 1.50, euro 2.01 and euro 3.33 per share, respectively. For 2006, 2007 and 2008 the weighted average considering options granted was euro 2.89, euro 2.98 and euro 2.60 per share, respectively.

The fair value was determined by applying the following assumptions:

    

2002

 

2003

 

2004

 

2005

 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

    
 
 
 
 
 
 
Risk-free interest rate (%) 3.5 3.2 3.2 2.5 4.0 4.7 4.9
Expected life (years) 8 8 8 8 6 6 6
Expected volatility (%) 43.0 22.0 19.0 21.0 16.8 16.3 19.2
Expected dividends (%) 4.5 5.4 4.5 4.0 5.3 4.9 6.1
    
 
 
 
 
 
 

Costs of the year related to stock grant and stock option plans amounted to euro 2512 million (euro 2027 million and euro 2725 million in 2006for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2007,2008, respectively).

F-98


Compensation of key management
Compensation of persons responsible for key positions in planning, direction and control functions of Eni Group, including executive and non-executive officers, general managers and managers with strategic responsibility (key management) amountin office for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 amounted to euro 2325 million, euro 25 million and euro 2535 million, for 2006, 2007 and 2008 respectively, and consisted of the following:

(euro million) 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
Wages and salaries 16 17 17
Post-employment benefits 1 1 1
Other long-term benefits 3 3 3
Stock grant/option 3 4 4
  23 25 25
(euro million) 

2007

 

2008

 

2009 (*)

  
 
 
Wages and salaries 17  17  20 
Post-employment benefits 1  1  1 
Other long-term benefits 3  3  10 
Stock grant/option 4  4  4 
  25  25  35 
  
 
 
(*)Comparing with the previous years, the increase is attributable to a different composition of key managers and to the introduction, as substitution of stock options, of deferred bonus. The fair value of such bonus is recognized in the year while the fair value of stock options was recognized pro-quota along the duration of the plan.

Compensation of Directors and Statutory Auditors
Compensation of Directors amounted to euro 8.78.9 million, euro 8.96.4 million and euro 6.49.9 million for 2006,the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2008,2009, respectively. Compensation of Statutory Auditors amounted to euro 0.686,0.678, euro 0.6780.634 million and euro 0.6340.475 million in 2006,for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2008,2009, respectively.

Compensation included emoluments and all other retributive and social security compensations due for the function of directors or statutory auditor assumed by Eni SpA or other companies included in the scope of consolidation, representing a cost for Eni.

Other operating income (loss)
Other operating income (loss) related to the recognition in the profit and loss account the effects related to the valuation of fair value, including the effects deriving from the settlement, of those derivatives on commodities which cannot be recognized according to the hedge accounting under IFRS. Net gain on commodity derivatives in the amount of euro 55 million (euro 129 and euro 124 million for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively) included euro 6 million related to the ineffective portion of the negative change in the fair value of cash flow hedging derivatives (time value component) entered into by the Exploration & Production segment (a loss of euro 52 million and a gain of euro 7 million for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively).

F-99


Depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairments
Depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairments charges consisted of the following:

(euro million) 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization:         
- tangible assets 4,694  4,935  5,994 
- intangible assets 1,462  2,096  2,436 
  6,156  7,031  8,430 
Impairments:         
- tangible assets 231  140  1,343 
- intangible assets 54  67  53 
  285  207  1,396 
less:         
- reversal of impairments - tangible assets (17)    (2)
- reversal of impairment - intangible assets       (1)
- capitalized direct costs associated with self-constructed assets - tangible assets (1) (1) (4)
- capitalized direct costs associated with self-constructed assets - intangible assets (2) (1) (4)
  6,421  7,236  9,815 
(euro million) 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization:         
- tangible assets 4,935  5,994  6,658 
- intangible assets 2,096  2,436  2,110 
  7,031  8,430  8,768 
Impairments:         
- tangible assets 145  1,343  990 
- intangible assets 62  53  62 
  207  1,396  1,052 
less:         
- reversal of impairments - tangible assets    (2) (1)
- reversal of impairment - intangible assets    (1)   
- capitalized direct costs associated with self-constructed assets - tangible assets (2) (6) (4)
- capitalized direct costs associated with self-constructed assets - intangible assets    (2) (2)
  7,236  9,815  9,813 
  
 
 

F-85


32 Financial31 Finance income (expense)
Finance income (expense) consisted of the following:

(euro million) 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
Finance income (expense)         
Finance income 3,749  4,445  7,985 
Finance expense (3,971) (4,554) (8,198)
  (222) (109) (213)
Gain (loss) on derivative financial instruments 383  26  (551)
  161  (83) (764)
(euro million) 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
Finance income (expense)         
Finance income 4,445  7,985  5,950 
Finance expense (4,554) (8,198) (6,497)
  (109) (213) (547)
Gain (loss) on derivative financial instruments 155  (427) (4)
  46  (640) (551)
  
 
 

F-100


Net finance income (expense) consisted of the following:

(euro million) 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
Finance income (expense) related to net borrowings         
Interest due to banks and other financial institutions (215) (445) (745)
Interest and other finance expense on ordinary bonds (248) (258) (248)
Interest from banks 194  236  87 
Interest and other income on financing receivables and securities held for non-operating purposes 62  55  82 
  (207) (412) (824)
Exchange differences         
Positive exchange differences 2,496  2,877  7,339 
Negative exchange differences (2,648) (2,928) (7,133)
  (152) (51) 206 
Other finance income (expense)         
Income from equity instruments    188  241 
Capitalized finance expense 116  180  236 
Interest and other income on financing receivables and securities held for operating purposes 119  96  62 
Interest on tax credits 17  31  37 
Finance expense due to passage of time (accretion discount) (a) (116) (186) (249)
Other finance income 1  45  78 
  137  354  405 
  (222) (109) (213)
(euro million) 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
Finance income (expense) related to net borrowings         
Interest and other finance expense on ordinary bonds (258) (248) (423)
Interest due to banks and other financial institutions (445) (745) (330)
Interest from banks 236  87  33 
Interest and other income on financing receivables and securities held for non-operating purposes 55  82  47 
  (412) (824) (673)
Exchange differences         
Positive exchange differences 2,877  7,339  5,572 
Negative exchange differences (2,928) (7,133) (5,678)
  (51) 206  (106)
Other finance income (expense)         
Capitalized finance expense 180  236  223 
Income from equity instruments 188  241  163 
Interest and other income on financing receivables and securities held for operating purposes 96  62  39 
Interest on tax credits 31  37  4 
Finance expense due to passage of time (accretion discount) (a) (186) (249) (218)
Other finance income 45  78  21 
  354  405  232 
  (109) (213) (547)
  
 
 
      
(a)  The item related to the increase in provisions for contingencies that are shown at present value in non-current liabilities.

Income from equity instruments in the amount of euro 241163 million (euro 188 million in 2007) relatingand euro 241 million for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008, respectively) related to the contractual remuneration of 9.4% on the 20% interest in OAO Gazprom Neft according to the contractual arrangements between Eni and Gazprom. Income has been recognized up to the date of the payment from Gazprom of the strike price on the call option, including the recovery of any additional costs, on April 24, 2009 (more information is included in Note 2 - Other financial assets held for trading or available for sale).

The fair value gain (loss) on derivative financial instruments consisted of the following:

(euro million) 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
Derivatives on exchange rate 313  120  (300)
Derivatives on interest rate 61  35  (127)
Derivatives on commodities 9  (129) (124)
  383  26  (551)
(euro million) 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
Derivatives on exchange rate 120  (300) 40 
Derivatives on interest rate 35  (127) (52)
Derivatives on commodities       8 
  155  (427) (4)
  
 
 

Net loss from derivatives in the amount of euro 5514 million (euro 383 million and euro 26155 million of net gain in 2006for the year ended December 31, 2007 and 2007, respectively)euro 427 million of net loss for the year ended December 31, 2008) was primarily due to the recognition in the profit and loss account of the change in the fair value of those derivatives thatwhich cannot be qualifiedrecognized according to the hedge accounting under IFRS as hedging instruments under IFRS. In fact, since these derivatives arethey were entered

F-86


into for amounts correspondingequal to the net exposure to exchange rate risk and interest rate risk, or commodity risk,and as such, they cannot be linkedreferred to specific trade or financing transactions.

The lack of these formal requirements in order to assessqualify these derivatives as hedging instruments under IFRS provides also included the recognition in the profit orand loss ofaccount the negative exchangeimpact from currency translation differences on assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency, as these translation effectsthis effect cannot be offset by changes in the fair value of derivative contracts.the related instruments.

Losses on commodity derivatives amounted to euro 124 million, included gain of euro 7 million related to the ineffective portion of the change in fair value of cash flow hedging derivatives (time value component) entered into by the Exploration & Production segment. Further information is given in Note 7 - Other current asset. The fair value of derivative contracts is provided in Note 7 - Other current asset, Note 15 - Other non-current receivables, Note 20 - Other current liabilities and Note 25 - Other non-current liabilities.F-101



3332 Income (expense) from investments

Share of profit (loss) of equity-accounted investments
Share of profit (loss) of equity-accounted investments consisted of the following:

(euro million) 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
Share of profit of equity-accounted investments 887  906  761 
Share of loss of equity-accounted investments (36) (135) (105)
Decreases (increases) in the provision for losses on investments (56) 2  (16)
  795  773  640 
(euro million) 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
Share of profit of equity-accounted investments 906  761  693 
Share of loss of equity-accounted investments (135) (105) (241)
Decreases (increases) in the provision for losses on investments 2  (16) (59)
  773  640  393 
  
 
 

More information is provided in Note 12 -11 – Investments.


Other gain (loss) from investments
Other gain (loss) from investments consisted of the following:

(euro million) 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
Gains on disposals 98  170  510 
Dividends 25  301  218 
Losses on disposals (7) (1) (1)
Other income (expense), net (8)    6 
  108  470  733 
(euro million) 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
Dividends 170  510  164 
Gains on disposals 301  218  16 
Losses on disposals (1) (1)   
Other income (expense), net    6  (4)
  470  733  176 
  
 
 

Dividends in the amount of euro 510164 million primarily relatedmainly relate to Nigeria LNG (euro 453 million) and Saudi European Petrochemical Co - Ibn Zahr (euro 34101 million).

Gains on disposals in 2009 amounted to euro 16 million and primarily related to a price revision for the sale of Gaztransport et Technigaz SAS (euro 10 million), which occurred in 2008. Gains on disposals in 2008 amounted to euro 218 million and primarily related to the sale of Gaztransport et Technigaz SAS (euro 185 million), Agip España SA (euro 15 million) and Padana Assicurazioni SpA (euro 10 million). Gains on disposals forin 2007 ofamounted to euro 301 million and primarily related to the sale of Haldor Topsøe AS (euro 265 million) and Camom SA (euro 25 million). Gains on disposals for 2006 of euro 25 million primarily related to the sale of Fiorentina Gas SpA and Toscana Gas SpA (euro 16 million).

F-87





3433 Income taxestax expense
Income taxestax expense consisted of the following:

(euro million) 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
Current taxes:         
- Italian subsidiaries 2,007  2,380  1,916 
- foreign subsidiaries of the Exploration & Production segment 6,740  6,695  9,744 
- foreign subsidiaries 529  482  426 
  9,276  9,557  12,086 
Net deferred taxes:         
- Italian subsidiaries 230  (582) (1,603)
- foreign subsidiaries of the Exploration & Production segment 1,095  246  (827)
- foreign subsidiaries (33) (2) 36 
  1,292  (338) (2,394)
  10,568  9,219  9,692 
(euro million) 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
Current taxes:         
- Italian subsidiaries 2,380  1,916  1,724 
- foreign subsidiaries of the Exploration & Production segment 6,695  9,744  5,989 
- foreign subsidiaries 482  426  483 
  9,557  12,086  8,196 
Net deferred taxes:         
- Italian subsidiaries (582) (1,603) (534)
- foreign subsidiaries of the Exploration & Production segment 246  (827) (733)
- foreign subsidiaries (2) 36  (173)
  (338) (2,394) (1,440)
  9,219  9,692  6,756 
  
 
 

Current income taxes in the amount of euro 1,9161,724 million were in respectconsist of IRES (euro 1,485 million) and IRAP (euro 219 million) for Italian subsidiaries for Ires (euro 1,408 million) and Irap (euro 307 million) and of foreign taxes (euro 20120 million).

F-102


The effective tax rate was 56.0% (46.0% and 50.3% (51.8%for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 46.0% in 2006 and 2007,2008, respectively) compared with a statutory tax rate of 40.1% (37.9% and 38.2% (37.9% in 2006for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2007,2008, respectively) and calculated by applying a 33.0%34.0%15 tax rate (Ires)(IRES) to profit before income taxes and 3.9% tax rate (Irap)(IRAP) to the net value of production as provided for by Italian laws.

The difference between the statutory and effective tax rate was due to the following factors:

(%) 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
Statutory tax rate 37.9  37.9  38.2 
Items increasing (decreasing) statutory tax rate:         
- higher foreign subsidiaries tax rate 13.6  10.2  15.2 
- changes in Italian statutory tax rate and adjustment of tax base of amortizable assets for Italian subsidiaries    (2.0)   
- impact pursuant to Law Decree No. 112 of June 25, 2008, the Budget Law 2008 and enactment of a renewed tax framework in Libya       (3.8)
- permanent differences and other adjustments 0.3  (0.1) 0.7 
  13.9  8.1  12.1 
  51.8  46.0  50.3 
(%) 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
Statutory tax rate 37.9  38.2  40.1 
Items increasing (decreasing) statutory tax rate:         
- higher foreign subsidiaries tax rate 10.2  15.2  13.3 
- changes in Italian statutory tax rate and adjustment of tax base of amortizable assets for Italian subsidiaries (2.0)      
- impact pursuant to Law Decree No. 112 of June 25, 2008, the Budget Law 2008 and enactment of a renewed tax framework in Libya    (3.8) 2.4 
- permanent differences and other adjustments (0,1) 0.7  0.2 
  8.1  12.1  15.9 
  46.0  50.3  56.0 
  
 
 

The increase in the tax rate of foreign subsidiaries primarily related to a 17.116.1 percentage points increase in the Exploration & Production segment (17.2%(15.0% and 15% in 200617.1% for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2007,2008, respectively).

The impact pursuant to Law Decree No. 112 of June 25, 2008, the Budget Law 2008 and enactment of a renewed tax framework in Libya of 3.8% consisted of the following: in the 2009 (i) the equalization in Libya of the 2008 income taxes in the amount of euro 230 million following adjustments to the valorization criteria of revenues; (ii) a reduced deductibility in Italy of cost of goods sold following the reduction in the gas volumes of inventories in the amount of euro 64 million; in the 2008 (iii) the utilization of deferred tax liabilities recognized on higher carrying amounts of year-end inventories of oil, gas and refined products stated at the weighted-average cost with respect to their tax base according to the last-in-first-out method (LIFO) (euro 528 million). In fact, pursuant to the Law Decree No. 112 of June 25, 2008 (become Law No. 133/2008), energy companies in Italy arewere required from 2008 to state inventories of hydrocarbons at the weighted-average cost for tax purposes as opposed to the previous LIFO evaluation and to recognize a one-off tax calculated by applying a special tax with a 16% rate on the difference between the two amounts. Accordingly, the profit and loss account benefited from the difference between utilization of deferred tax liabilities accrued on hydrocarbons inventories and the one-off tax (euro 229 million), for a total positive impact of euro 176 million, which consider the previously applicable statutory tax rate (Ires)(IRES) of 33% pursuant to the Law Decree No. 112 of June 25, 2008 instead of 27.5% of the previous tax regime. This one-off tax will be paid in three annual installments of same amount, due from 2009 onwards; (ii)(iv) application of the Italian Budget Law for 2008 that provide an increase in limits whereby carrying amounts of assets and liabilities of consolidated subsidiaries can be recognized for tax purposes by paying a one-off tax calculated by


(15)Includes a 5.5% supplemental tax rate on taxable profit of energy companies in Italy (whose primary activity is the production and marketing of hydrocarbons and electricity and with annual revenues in excess of euro 25 million) effective January 1, 2008 and pursuant to the Law Decree No. 112 of June 25, 2008.

F-88


applying a special rate of 6% (positive impact on the profit and loss account in the amount of euro 370 million; euro 290 million net of the special tax); (iii)(v) enactment of a renewed tax framework in Libya regarding oil companies operating in accordance with production sharing schemes. Based on the new provisions, the tax base of the Company’s Libyan oil properties has been reassessed resulting in the partial utilization of previously accrued tax liabilities in the amount of euro 173 million; and (iv)(vi) the impact of above mentioned Law Decree No. 112/2008 on energy companies calculated by applying statutory tax rate (Ires)(IRES) of 33% pursuant to the Law Decree No. 112 of June 25, 112/2008 instead of the previously applicable statutory tax rate (Ires)(IRES) of 27.5% (euro 94 million).

In 2006 the increase in the tax rate of foreign subsidiaries relating the Exploration & Production segment included the application of a windfall tax introduced by the Algerian government with effect starting from August 1, 2006 (1.6 percentage points) and a supplemental tax rate introduced by the government of the United kingdom relating to the North Sea productions with effect starting from January 1, 2006 (1 percentage point).

The adjustment to deferred tax assets and liabilities and to the 2007 tax rate for Italian subsidiaries were recognized in connection with certain amendments to the Italian tax regime enacted by the 2008 Budget Law.Law and the subsequent modification introduced by the Law Decree No. 112/2008. These included an option regarding the increase of the tax bases of certain tangible and other assets to their carrying amounts (euro 773 million) by paying a special tax (euro 325 million) and a lower statutory tax rate (Ires(IRES from 33% to 27.5%, IrapIRAP from 4.25% to 3.9%, euro 54 million).


(15)Includes a 5.5% supplemental tax rate on taxable profit of energy companies in Italy (whose primary activity is the production and marketing of hydrocarbons and electricity and with annual revenues in excess of euro 25 million) effective from January 1, 2008 and a further 1% increase effective from January 1, 2009, pursuant to the Law Decree No. 112 of June 25, 2008.

F-103


In 20062009, permanent differences mainly arose from certain chargesand other adjustments for 0.2 percentage points included: (i) as an increase, a non-recurring item represented by a charge amounting to euro 250 million that are not deductible because takenwas estimated on the base of the management’s best knowledge of the possible resolution of the TSKJ matter with U.S. Authorities. More information is provided in connection with risk provisions arising from proceedings againstNote 28 – Guarantees, commitments and risks; and (ii) as a decrease, deferred tax assets accounted for following an adjustment of the fiscal value to the carrying amount of oil & gas properties related to a reorganization of the Italian Antitrustactivities by paying a special tax and other regulatory Authorities (0.4 percentage points)the partial deductibility of IRAP of income taxes from previous years (euro 222 million).




3534 Earnings per share attributable to Eni
Basic earnings per ordinary share are calculated by dividing net profit for the year attributable to Eni’s shareholders by the weighted average number of ordinary shares issued and outstanding during the year, excluding treasury shares.

The average number of ordinary shares used for the calculation of the basic earnings per share outstanding atas of December 31, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2008,2009, was 3,698,201,896, 3,668,305,807, 3,638,835,896 and 3,638,835,8963,622,405,852, respectively.

Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net profit for the year attributable to Eni’s shareholders by the weighted average number of fully-diluted shares fully-diluted which includes issued and outstanding shares during the year, excluding treasury shares and including the number of shares that could potentially be issued potentially in connection with stock-based compensation plans. As of December 31, 2008 and 2009, the number of shares that could potentially be issued were related to stock options plans. As of December 31, 2007, the number of shares that could potentially be issued were related to stock options and stock grant plans.

The average number of shares fully diluted used in the calculation of diluted earnings was 3,701,262,557, 3,669,172,762, 3,638,854,276 and 3,638,854,2763,622,438,937 for the years endingended December 31, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2008,2009, respectively.

Reconciliation of the average number of shares used for the calculation for both basic and diluted earningearnings per share was as follows:

  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
Average number of shares used for the calculation of the basic earnings per share   

3,698,201,896

 

3,668,305,807

 

3,638,835,896

Number of potential shares following stock grant plans   

1,070,676

 

302,092

  
Number of potential shares following stock options plans   

1,989,985

 

564,863

 

18,380

Average number of shares used for the calculation of the diluted earnings per share   

3,701,262,557

 

3,669,172,762

 

3,638,854,276

Eni’s net profit 

(euro million)

 

9,217

 

10,011

 

8,825

Basic earning per share 

(euro per share)

 

2.49

 

2.73

 

2.43

Diluted earning per share 

(euro per share)

 

2.49

 

2.73

 

2.43

  

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
Average number of shares used for the calculation of the basic earnings per share   3,668,305,807 3,638,835,896 3,622,405,852
Number of potential shares following stock grant plans   302,092    
Number of potential shares following stock options plans   564,863 18,380 33,085
Average number of shares used for the calculation of the diluted earnings per share   3,669,172,762 3,638,854,276 3,622,438,937
Eni’s net profit (euro million) 10,011 8,825 4,367
Basic earning per share (euro per share) 2.73 2.43 1.21
Diluted earning per share (euro per share) 2.73 2.43 1.21
  
 
 

 

F-89

F-104


3635 Information by industry segment and geographic financial information

Information by industry segment

(euro million)

 

Exploration & Production

 

Gas & Power

 

Refining & Marketing

 

Petrochemicals

 

Engineering & Construction

 

Other activities

 

Corporate and financial companies

 

Intra-Group
profits

 

Total

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2006                           
Net sales from operations (a) 

27,173

  

28,368

  

38,210

  

6,823

  

6,979

  

823

  

1,174

       
Less: intersegment sales 

(18,445

) 

(751

) 

(1,300

) 

(667

) 

(771

) 

(520

) 

(991

)      
Net sales to customers 

8,728

  

27,617

  

36,910

  

6,156

  

6,208

  

303

  

183

     

86,105

 
Operating profit 

15,580

  

3,802

  

319

  

172

  

505

  

(622

) 

(296

) 

(133

) 

19,327

 
Provisions for contingencies 

153

  

197

  

264

  

30

  

(13

) 

236

  

(100

)    

767

 
Depreciation, amortization and writedowns 

4,776

  

738

  

447

  

174

  

196

  

28

  

71

  

(9

) 

6,421

 
Share of profit (loss) of equity-accounted investments 

28

  

509

  

194

  

2

  

66

  

(4

)       

795

 
Identifiable assets (b) 

29,720

  

23,500

  

11,359

  

2,984

  

6,362

  

344

  

1,023

  

(666

) 

74,626

 
Unallocated assets                         

13,686

 
Equity-accounted investments 

258

  

2,214

  

874

  

11

  

483

  

46

        

3,886

 
Identifiable liabilities (c) 

9,119

  

5,284

  

4,712

  

806

  

3,869

  

1,940

  

1,619

     

27,349

 
Unallocated liabilities                         

19,764

 
Capital expenditures 

5,203

  

1,174

  

645

  

99

  

591

  

72

  

88

  

(39

) 

7,833

 
2007                           
Net sales from operations (a) 

27,278

  

27,633

  

36,401

  

6,934

  

8,678

  

205

  

1,313

       
Less: intersegment sales 

(16,475

) 

(760

) 

(1,276

) 

(363

) 

(1,182

) 

(31

) 

(1,099

)      
Net sales to customers 

10,803

  

26,873

  

35,125

  

6,571

  

7,496

  

174

  

214

     

87,256

 
Operating profit 

13,788

  

4,127

  

729

  

74

  

837

  

(444

) 

(217

) 

(26

) 

18,868

 
Provisions for contingencies 

5

  

37

  

256

  

15

  

11

  

264

  

3

     

591

 
Depreciation, amortization and writedowns 

5,626

  

687

  

491

  

116

  

248

  

10

  

68

  

(10

) 

7,236

 
Share of profit (loss) of equity-accounted investments 

23

  

449

  

216

     

79

  

6

        

773

 
Identifiable assets (b) 

33,435

  

24,530

  

13,767

  

3,427

  

8,017

  

275

  

854

  

(692

) 

83,613

 
Unallocated assets                         

17,847

 
Equity-accounted investments 

1,926

  

2,152

  

1,267

  

15

  

230

  

49

        

5,639

 
Identifiable liabilities (c) 

11,480

  

5,390

  

5,420

  

939

  

4,349

  

1,827

  

1,380

     

30,785

 
Unallocated liabilities                         

27,808

 
Capital expenditures 

6,625

  

1,366

  

979

  

145

  

1,410

  

59

  

108

  

(99

) 

10,593

 
2008                           
Net sales from operations (a) 

33,318

  

36,936

  

45,083

  

6,303

  

9,176

  

185

  

1,331

  

75

    
Less: intersegment sales 

(19,067

) 

(873

) 

(1,496

) 

(398

) 

(1,219

) 

(29

) 

(1,177

)      
Net sales to customers 

14,251

  

36,063

  

43,587

  

5,905

  

7,957

  

156

  

154

  

75

  

108,148

 
Operating profit 

16,415

  

3,933

  

(1,023

) 

(822

) 

1,045

  

(346

) 

(686

) 

125

  

18,641

 
Provisions for contingencies 

155

  

237

  

206

  

2

  

36

  

99

  

165

     

900

 
Depreciation, amortization and writedowns 

7,542

  

744

  

729

  

395

  

335

  

8

  

76

  

(14)

  

9,815

 
Share of profit (loss) of equity-accounted investments 

173

  

413

  

16

  

(9

) 

43

  

4

        

640

 
Identifiable assets (b) 

41,989

  

31,894

  

11,081

  

2,629

  

10,630

  

362

  

789

  

(641

) 

98,733

 
Unallocated assets                         

17,857

 
Equity-accounted investments 

1,787

  

2,249

  

1,227

  

25

  

130

  

53

        

5,471

 
Identifiable liabilities (c) 

11,030

  

11,212

  

4,481

  

664

  

6,177

  

1,638

  

1,780

  

(75

) 

36,907

 
Unallocated liabilities                         

31,173

 
Capital expenditures 

9,545

  

1,794

  

965

  

212

  

2,027

  

52

  

95

  

(128

) 

14,562

 
2007                          
Net sales from operations (a) 26,920  27,793  36,349  6,934  8,678  205  1,313      
Less: intersegment sales (16,280) (757) (1,276) (363) (1,182) (31) (1,099)     
Net sales to customers 10,640  27,036  35,073  6,571  7,496  174  214     87,204
Operating profit 13,433  4,465  686  100  837  (444) (312) (26) 18,739
Provisions for contingencies 7  35  238  15  11  264  3     573
Depreciation, amortization and writedowns 5,574  739  491  116  248  10  68  (10) 7,236
Share of profit (loss) of equity-accounted investments 23  449  216     79  6        773
Identifiable assets (b) 32,382  25,583  13,767  3,427  8,017  275  854  (692) 83,613
Unallocated assets                         17,847
Equity-accounted investments 1,926  2,152  1,267  15  230  49        5,639
Identifiable liabilities (c) 10,955  5,915  5,420  939  4,349  1,827  1,380     30,785
Unallocated liabilities                         27,808
Capital expenditures 6,480  1,511  979  145  1,410  59  108  (99) 10,593
2008                          
Net sales from operations (a) 33,042  37,062  45,017  6,303  9,176  185  1,331  75   
Less: intersegment sales (18,917) (873) (1,496) (398) (1,219) (29) (1,177)     
Net sales to customers 14,125  36,189  43,521  5,905  7,957  156  154  75  108,082
Operating profit 16,239  4,030  (988) (845) 1,045  (346) (743) 125  18,517
Provisions for contingencies 154  238  190  2  36  99  165     884
Depreciation, amortization and writedowns 7,488  798  729  395  335  8  76  (14) 9,815
Share of profit (loss) of equity-accounted investments 173  413  16  (9) 43  4        640
Identifiable assets (b) 40,815  33,151  11,081  2,629  10,630  362  789  (641) 98,816
Unallocated assets                         17,857
Equity-accounted investments 1,787  2,249  1,227  25  130  53        5,471
Identifiable liabilities (c) 10,481  11,802  4,481  664  6,177  1,638  1,780  (75) 36,948
Unallocated liabilities                         31,215
Capital expenditures 9,281  2,058  965  212  2,027  52  95  (128) 14,562
2009                          
Net sales from operations (a) 23,801  30,447  31,769  4,203  9,664  88  1,280  (66)  
Less: intersegment sales (13,630) (635) (965) (238) (1,315) (24) (1,152)     
Net sales to customers 10,171  29,812  30,804  3,965  8,349  64  128  (66) 83,227
Operating profit 9,120  3,687  (102) (675) 881  (382) (474)    12,055
Provisions for contingencies (2) 277  154  1  311  139  175     1,055
Depreciation, amortization and writedowns 7,365  981  754  204  435  8  83  (17) 9,813
Share of profit (loss) of equity-accounted investments 142  310  (70)    50  (39)       393
Identifiable assets (b) 42,729  32,135  12,244  2,583  11,611  355  1,031  (553) 102,135
Unallocated assets                         15,394
Equity-accounted investments 1,989  2,044  1,494  37  213  51        5,828
Identifiable liabilities (c) 10,918  9,161  4,684  742  5,967  1,639  1,690  (8) 34,793
Unallocated liabilities                         32,685
Capital expenditures 9,486  1,686  635  145  1,630  44  57  12  13,695
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
(a)  Before elimination of intersegment sales.
(b)  IncludedIncludes assets directly associated with the generation of operating profit.
(c)  IncludedIncludes liabilities directly associated with the generation of operating profit.

F-90F-105


Inter-segment sales wereIntersegment revenues are conducted onat an arm’s length basis.

Geographic financial information

Assets

Identifiable assets and investments by geographic area of origin

(euro million)   

Italy

 

Other European Union

 

Rest of Europe

 

AmericasAmerica

 

Asia

 

Africa

 

Other areas

 

Total

    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2006                
Identifiable assets (a) 

37,339

 

10,037

 

3,200

 

2,987

 

6,341

 

14,190

 

532

 

74,626

Capital expenditures 

2,529

 

713

 

436

 

572

 

1,032

 

2,419

 

132

 

7,833

2007                                
Identifiable assets (a) 

39,742

 

11,071

 

3,917

 

6,260

 

6,733

 

15,368

 

522

 

83,613

 39,742 11,071 3,917 6,260 6,733 15,368 522 83,613
Capital expenditures 

3,246

 

1,246

 

469

 

1,004

 

1,253

 

3,152

 

223

 

10,593

 3,246 1,246 469 1,004 1,253 3,152 223 10,593
2008                                
Identifiable assets (a) 

40,432

 

15,065

 

3,561

 

6,149

 

10,561

 

22,044

 

921

 

98,733

 40,432 15,071 3,561 6,224 10,563 22,044 921 98,816
Capital expenditures 

3,674

 

1,660

 

582

 

1,240

 

1,777

 

5,153

 

476

 

14,562

 3,674 1,660 582 1,240 1,777 5,153 476 14,562
2009                
Identifiable assets (a) 40,861 15,571 3,520 6,337 11,187 23,397 1,262 102,135
Capital expenditures 3,198 1,454 574 1,207 2,033 4,645 584 13,695
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
(a)  Includes assets directly related to the generation of operating profit.

Sales from operations by geographic area of destination

(euro million) 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
Italy 36,343 37,346 42,909
Other European Union 23,949 23,074 29,341
Rest of Europe 6,975 5,507 7,125
Americas 6,250 6,447 7,218
Asia 5,595 5,840 8,916
Africa 5,949 8,010 12,331
Other areas 1,044 1,032 308
  86,105 87,256 108,148
(euro million) 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
Italy 37,294  42,843  27,950 
Other European Union 23,074  29,341  24,331 
Rest of Europe 5,507  7,125  5,213 
America 6,447  7,218  7,080 
Asia 5,840  8,916  8,208 
Africa 8,010  12,331  10,174 
Other areas 1,032  308  271 
  87,204  108,082  83,227 
  
 
 



3736 Transactions with related parties

In the ordinary course of its business Eni enters into transactions regarding:relating to:

a) the exchange of goods, provision of services and financing with joint ventures, associates and non-consolidated subsidiaries;
b) the exchange of goods and provision of services with entities directly and indirectly owned or controlled by the Government;
c) transactions with the Cosmi Holding Group, which is related to Eni SpA through a member of the Board of Directors, related tofor certain acquisition of engineering, construction and maintenance services. Relevant transactions which were executed onat an arm’s length basis amounted to approximately euro 1318 million, euro 1813 million and euro 1321 million in 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2008,2009, respectively. AtAs of December 31, 20082009, there were outstanding receivables forin the amount of euro 4 million and payables forin the amount euro 9 million (euro 4 million and euro 8 million;million as of December 31, 2008, respectively);
d) contributions to entities, controlled by Eni with the aim to develop solidarity, culture and research initiatives. In particular these related to: (a)(i) Eni Foundation established by Eni as a non-profit entity with the aim of pursuing exclusively solidarity initiatives in the fields of social assistance, health, education, culture and environment as well as research and development. Transactions with Eni Foundation related to contributioncontributions for the year ended December 31, 2008 in the amount of euro 200 million to the solidarity fund pursuant to Italian Law Decree No. 112/2008 and the payable as of December 31, 2008 and 2009 in the amount of euro 100 million related to the partportion of the contribution that had not alreadyyet been paid. Transactions in the past periods preceding 2008 were not material; (b)(ii) Enrico Mattei Foundation established by

F-106


Eni with the aim of enhancing, through studies, research and training initiatives, knowledge in the fields of

F-91


economics, energy and environment, both at the national and international level. Transactions with Enrico Mattei Foundation were not material.

Transactions with related parties were conducted in the interest of Eni companies and, with exception of those with entities with the aim to develop solidarity, culture and research initiatives, onat an arm’s length basis.

Trade and other transactions with joint ventures, associates and non-consolidated subsidiaries as well as with entities directly and indirectly owned or controlled by the Government in the 2006,years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2008,2009, respectively, consisted of the following:

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20062007

 

20062007

  
 
 

Costs

 

Revenues

 
 
Name  

Receivables and other assets

  

Payables and other liabilities

  

Guarantees

  

Goods

  

Services

  

Goods

  

Services









Joint ventures and associates              
ASG Scarl 7 40 80   88 1 1
Azienda Energia e Servizi Torino SpA 1 22     64 1 1
Bernhard Rosa Inh. Ingeborg Plöchinger GmbH 10         96  
Blue Stream Pipeline Co BV 34 19     193   1
Bronberger & Kessler Und Gilg & Schweiger GmbH 11         113  
CAM Petroli Srl 103         310  
CEPAV (Consorzio Eni per l’Alta Velocità) Uno 87 87 5,654 16 2   304
Charville - Consultores e Serviços Lda 7   85     4 11
Eni Oil Co Ltd 5 96     59    
Fox Energy SpA 35         125  
Gasversorgung Süddeutschland GmbH 14       1 123 19
Gruppo Distribuzione Petroli Srl 19         54  
Karachaganak Petroleum Operating BV 23 70   29 129   7
Mangrove Gas Netherlands BV   1 52        
Mellitah Oil & Gas BV 28 90   7 72 8 2
Petrobel Belayim Petroleum Co   3     181    
Promgas SpA 44 39   375   419  
Raffineria di Milazzo ScpA 9 12     237 109  
Rodano Consortile Scarl 3 14     54   1
RPCO Enterprises Ltd 13   104       12
Supermetanol CA   13   91      
Super Octanos CA   13   257      
Trans Austria Gasleitung GmbH 7 78   53 138   56
Transitgas AG   8     64    
Transmediterranean Pipeline Co Ltd   7     80    
Unión Fenosa Gas SA 1 7 61 93 7    
Other (*) 72 169 168 75 188 119 66
  533 788 6,204 996 1,557 1,482 481
Unconsolidated entities controlled by Eni              
Agip Kazakhstan North Caspian Operating Co NV 27 132   18 16   57
Eni BTC Ltd     185        
Eni Timor Leste SpA     102        
Other (*) 20 30 8 1 4 8 4
  47 162 295 19 20 8 61
  580 950 6,499 1,015 1,577 1,490 542
Entities owned or controlled by the Government              
Gruppo Alitalia 12         354  
Gruppo Enel 162 42   47 33 1,068 383
Other (*) 42 29   4 44 136 1
  216 71   51 77 1,558 384
  796 1,021 6,499 1,066 1,654 3,048 926
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
(*)Each individual amount included herein does not exceed euro 50 million.

F-92


(euro million)

Dec. 31, 2007

2007



Costs

Revenues



Name

Receivables and other assets

  

Payables and other liabilities

Guarantees

Goods

Services

Goods

ServicesOther operating (charge) income


 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Joint ventures and associates                              
ASG Scarl 6 43 121   108   3 6 43 121   108   3  
Bernhard Rosa Inh. Ingeborg Plöchinger GmbH 11         86   11         86    
Blue Stream Pipeline Co BV 19       183   1 19       183   1  
Bronberger & Kessler und Gill & Schweiger GmbH 18         106  
CEPAV (Consorzio Eni per l’Alta Velocità) Uno 84 70 5,870       263
CEPAV (Consorzio Eni per l’Alta Velocità) Due 1 1 64   1   1
Bronberger & Kessler und Gilg & Schweiger GmbH 18         106    
CEPAV (Consorzio Eni per l'Alta Velocità) Uno 84 70 5,870       263  
CEPAV (Consorzio Eni per l'Alta Velocità) Due 1 1 64   1   1  
Eni Oil Co Ltd 7 60     141 1   7 60     141 1    
Fox Energy SpA 49         139   49         139    
Gasversorgung Süddeutschland GmbH 54         195 4 54         195 4  
Gruppo Distribuzione Petroli Srl 26         50   26         50    
Karachaganak Petroleum Operating BV 43 102   24 301   7 43 102   24 301   7  
Mellitah Oil & Gas BV 10 137     105 1 6 10 137     105 1 6  
OOO "EniNeftegaz" 215           1 215           1  
Petrobel Belayim Petroleum Co   60     211       60     211      
Raffineria di Milazzo ScpA 17 21     245 118 5 17 21     245 118 5  
Supermetanol CA   11   78     1   11   78     1  
Super Octanos CA   18   201     1   18   201     1  
Trans Austria Gasleitung GmbH 6 80   43 147   47 6 80   43 147   47  
Transitgas AG   8     64       8     64      
Transmediterranean Pipeline Co Ltd   6     70   1   6     70   1  
Unión Fenosa Gas SA 1   61     193   1   61     193    
Other (*) 120 127 56 76 374 172 118 120 127 56 76 374 122 118  
 687 744 6,172 422 1,950 1,011 459 687 744 6,172 422 1,950 1,011 459  
Unconsolidated entities controlled by Eni                              
Agip Kazakhstan North Caspian Operating Co NV 49 111   11 534   52 49 111   11 534   52  
Eni BTC Ltd     138       1     138       1  
Other (*) 23 8 11 2 18 5 18 23 8 11 2 18 5 18  
 72 119 149 13 552 5 71 72 119 149 13 552 5 71  
 759 863 6,321 435 2,502 1,016 530 759 863 6,321 435 2,502 1,016 530  
Entities owned or controlled by the Government                              
Gruppo Alitalia 4         363 1 4         363 1  
Gruppo Enel 384 8     245 894 408 384 8     245 894 408  
GSE - Gestore Servizi Elettrici 124 63   239 37 870 7 124 63   239 37 870 7 10
Terna SpA 19 69   106 105   31 19 69   106 105   31  
Other (*) 45 79   19 89 75 3 45 79   19 89 75 3  
 576 219   364 476 2,202 450 576 219   364 476 2,202 450 10
 1,335 1,082 6,321 799 2,978 3,218 980 1,335 1,082 6,321 799 2,978 3,218 980 10


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
(*)  Each individual amount included herein does not exceed euro 50 million.

F-93F-107


(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 2008

 

2008

  
 
 

Costs

 

Revenues

 
 
Name  

Receivables and other assets

  

Payables and other liabilities

  

Guarantees

  

Goods

  

Services

  

Other

  

Goods

  

Services

  

Other

Other operating (charge) income


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Joint ventures and associates                                      
Agiba Petroleum   

11

     

60

        
Agiba Petroleum Co   11     60          
Altergaz SA 

30

           

135

     30           135      
ASG Scarl 

2

 

25

 

49

   

57

         2 25 49   57          
Bayernoil Raffineriegesellschaft mbH 

3

 

4

 

1

 

6

 

62

   

4

     3 4 1 6 62   4      
Bernhard Rosa Inh. Ingeborg Plöchinger GmbH 

5

           

98

     5           98      
Blue Stream Pipeline Co BV 

23

 

17

     

171

     

1

   23 17     171     1    
Bronberger & Kessler und Gilg & Schweiger GmbH 

12

           

175

     12           175      
CEPAV (Consorzio Eni per l’Alta Velocità) Uno 

95

 

37

 

6,001

   

17

 

3

   

397

  
CEPAV (Consorzio Eni per l’Alta Velocità) Due 

4

 

1

 

64

   

1

     

1

  
CEPAV (Consorzio Eni per l'Alta Velocità) Uno 95 37 6,001   17 3   397    
CEPAV (Consorzio Eni per l'Alta Velocità) Due 4 1 64   1     1    
Eni Oil Co Ltd 

9

 

28

     

660

     

6

   9 28     660     6    
Fox Energy SpA 

37

     

2

     

329

 

1

   37     2     329 1    
FPSO Mystras - Produção de Petroleo Lda       

94

   

10

      
FPSO Mystras - Produção de Petròleo Lda       94   10        
Gasversorgung Süddeutschland GmbH 

64

           

337

 

18

   64           337 18    
Gruppo Distribuzione Petroli Srl 

20

           

111

     20           111      
InAgip doo 

24

 

45

     

116

   

3

 

35

   24 45     116   3 35    
Karachaganak Petròleum Operating BV 

72

 

207

   

874

 

380

 

25

   

12

  
Karachaganak Petroleum Operating BV 72 207   874 380 25   12    
Mellitah Oil & Gas BV 

10

 

121

     

329

   

2

 

4

   10 121     329   2 4    
Petrobel Belayim Petroleum Co   

77

     

181

           77     181          
Raffineria di Milazzo ScpA 

11

 

4

     

276

   

135

 

3

   11 4     276   135 3    
Saipon Snc 

4

   

58

         

12

   4   58         12    
Super Octanos CA   

24

   

286

             24   286            
Supermetanol CA   

5

   

90

             5   90            
Trans Austria Gasleitung GmbH 

8

 

78

   

60

 

153

     

64

   8 78   60 153     64    
Transitgas AG   

5

     

1

 

64

         5     1 64        
Unión Fenosa Gas SA 

1

 

25

 

62

 

25

     

257

 

1

   1 25 62 25     257 1    
Other (*) 

231

 

115

 

18

 

36

 

319

 

46

 

71

 

129

 

8

 231 115 18 36 319 46 71 129 8  
 

655

 

829

 

6,253

 

1,473

 

2,783

 

148

 

1,657

 

684

 

8

 665 829 6,253 1,473 2,783 148 1,657 684 8  
Unconsolidated entities controlled by Eni                                      
Agip Kazakhstan North Caspian Operating Co NV 

144

 

166

     

720

 

11

 

1

 

367

 

10

 144 166     720 11 1 367 10  
Eni BTC Ltd  ��  

146

                 146              
Other (*) 

22

 

18

 

4

 

2

 

20

 

2

 

4

 

6

 

4

 22 18 4 2 20 2 4 6 4  
 

166

 

184

 

150

 

2

 

740

 

13

 

5

 

373

 

14

 166 184 150 2 740 13 5 373 14  
 

831

 

1,013

 

6,403

 

1,475

 

3,523

 

161

 

1,662

 

1,057

 

22

 831 1,013 6,403 1,475 3,523 161 1,662 1,057 22  
Entities owned or controlled by the Government                                      
Ferrovie dello Stato 

4

           

417

 

2

  
Gruppo Alitalia 

153

 

12

   

13

 

223

   

941

 

380

   4           417 2    
Gruppo Enel 

19

 

7

     

27

 

1

 

57

     153 12   13 223   941 380    
Gruppo Ferrovie dello Stato 19 7     27 1 57      
GSE - Gestore Servizi Elettrici 

92

 

63

   

315

   

79

 

347

 

16

 

6

 92 63   315   79 347 16 6 58
Terna SpA 

33

 

35

   

14

 

128

   

12

 

83

 

10

 33 35   14 128   12 83 10  
Other (*) 

28

 

72

   

33

 

88

 

5

 

72

 

2

 

1

 28 72   33 88 5 72 2 1  
 

329

 

189

   

375

 

466

 

85

 

1,846

 

483

 

17

 329 189   375 466 85 1,846 483 17 58
 

1,160

 

1,202

 

6,403

 

1,850

 

3,989

 

246

 

3,508

 

1,540

 

39

 1,160 1,202 6,403 1,850 3,989 246 3,508 1,540 39 58

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(*)Each individual amount included herein does not exceed euro 50 million.

F-108


(euro million)

Dec. 31, 2009

2009



Costs

Revenues



Name

Receivables and other assets

Payables and other liabilities

Guarantees

Goods

Services

Other

Goods

Services

Other

Other operating (charge) income












Joint ventures and associates                    
Agiba Petroleum Co   5     64          
Altergaz SA 50           142      
ASG Scarl   10 54   25          
Azienda Energia e Servizi Torino SpA 1 30     62     1    
Bayernoil Raffineriegesellschaft mbH   31 1 15 77   2      
Blue Stream Pipeline Co BV 17 15 34   163          
Bronberger & Kessler und Gilg & Schweiger GmbH 16           95      
CEPAV (Consorzio Eni per l'Alta Velocità) Uno 38 12 6,037   5     84    
CEPAV (Consorzio Eni per l'Alta Velocità) Due 6 1 76   1     2    
Fox Energy SpA 44     1     241      
Gasversorgung Süddeutschland GmbH 17           196 8    
Gruppo Distribuzione Petroli Srl 15           71      
InAgip doo 44 23     86     71    
Karachaganak Petroleum Operating BV 61 196   588 344 27 9 10    
Kwanda Suporto Logistico Lda 72             20    
Mellitah Oil & Gas BV 30 190     306   2 31    
Petrobel Belayim Petroleum Co 4 12     205     4 2  
Raffineria di Milazzo ScpA 14 8     242   98 5    
Saipon Snc 8 2 61         45    
Super Octanos CA   24   133            
Trans Austria Gasleitung GmbH 4 71   36 157     40    
Transitgas AG         1 61        
Unión Fenosa Gas SA 8   62 12     53   1  
Other (*) 143 58 15 62 188 41 117 125 10  
  592 688 6,340 847 1,926 129 1,026 446 13  
Unconsolidated entities controlled by Eni                    
Agip Kazakhstan North Caspian Operating Co NV 194 224   1 914 7 15 466 7  
Eni BTC Ltd     141         1    
Other (*) 29 23 4 1 52 4 14 6 1  
  223 247 145 2 966 11 29 473 8  
  815 935 6,485 849 2,892 140 1,055 919 21  
Entities owned or controlled by the Government                    
Gruppo Enel 96 32   9 286 77 342 428 1  
Gruppo Finmeccanica 33 37   16 56   21 7    
GSE - Gestore Servizi Elettrici 83 74   373   79 342 15   19
Terna SpA 7 37   52 52 19 7 86 4 25
Other (*) 78 71   1 71 6 62 16    
  297 251   451 465 181 774 552 5 44
  1,112 1,186 6,485 1,300 3,357 321 1,829 1,471 26 44


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
(*)  Each individual amount included herein does not exceed euro 50 million.

MostThe most significant transactions with joint ventures, associates and non-consolidated subsidiaries concerned:consisted of the following:

F-94


F-109


MostThe most significant transactions with entities owned or controlled by the Government concerned:consisted of the following:

Financing transactions with joint ventures, associates and non-consolidated subsidiaries as well as with entities directly and indirectly owned or controlled by the Government infor the 2006,years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2008,2009, respectively, consisted of the following:

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 20062007

 

20062007

  
 
Name  

Receivables

  

Payables

  

Guarantees

  

Charges

  

Gains


 
 
 
 
 
Joint ventures and associates                    
Blue Stream Pipeline Co BV   

3

 

794

 

4

 

26

   1 711   20
Raffineria di Milazzo ScpA     

57

         60    
Spanish Egyptian Gas Co SAE     

323

    
Trans Austria Gasleitung GmbH 

41

       

6

 65       3
Transmediterranean Pipeline Co Ltd 

147

       

11

 97       9
Other (*) 

88

 

81

 

39

 

13

 

11

 108 120 52 19 11
 

276

 

84

 

1,213

 

17

 

54

 270 121 823 19 43
Unconsolidated entities controlled by Eni                    
Other (*) 

95

 

25

 

2

 

1

 

4

 114 26 1 1 6
 

95

 

25

 

2

 

1

 

4

 114 26 1 1 6
 

371

 

109

 

1,215

 

18

 

58

 384 147 824 20 49

 
 
 
 
 
      
(*)  Each individual amount included herein does not exceed euro 50 million.

F-95F-110


(euro million)

Dec. 31, 2007

2007



Name

Receivables

Payables

Guarantees

Charges

Gains

Derivative financial instruments








Joint ventures and associates            
Blue Stream Pipeline Co BV   1 711   20  
Raffineria di Milazzo ScpA     60      
Trans Austria Gasleitung GmbH 65       3  
Transmediterranean Pipeline Co Ltd 97       9  
Other (*) 108 120 52 19 11  
  270 121 823 19 43  
Unconsolidated entities controlled by Eni            
Other (*) 114 26 1 1 6  
  114 26 1 1 6  
Entities owned or controlled by the Government            
GSE - Gestore Servizi Elettrici           10
            10
  384 147 824 20 49 10







(*)Each individual amount included herein does not exceed euro 50 million.

(euro million) 

Dec. 31, 2008

 

2008

  
 
Name  

Receivables

  

Payables

  

Guarantees

  

Charges

  

Gains

Derivative financial instruments


 
 
 
 
 

Joint ventures and associates                      
Bayernoil Raffineriegesellschaft mbH 131           131        
Blue Stream Pipeline Co BV     752   14       752   14
PetroSucre SA 153           153        
Raffineria di Milazzo ScpA     70           70    
Trans Austria Gasleitung GmbH 186       7   186       7
Transmediterranean Pipeline Co Ltd 103       6   103       6
Other (*) 123 124 27 16 9   123 124 27 16 9
 696 124 849 16 36   696 124 849 16 36
Unconsolidated entities controlled by Eni                      
Other (*) 115 38 1 1 6   115 38 1 1 6
 115 38 1 1 6   115 38 1 1 6
Entities owned or controlled by the Government            
GSE - Gestore Servizi Elettrici           58
           58 811 162 850 17 42
 811 162 850 17 42 58


 
 
 
 
 
      
(*)  Each individual amount included herein does not exceed euro 50 million.

Most

(euro million)

Dec. 31, 2009

2009



Name

Receivables

Payables

Guarantees

Charges

Gains







Joint ventures and associates          
Artic Russia BV 70 1 170   1
Bayernoil Raffineriegesellschaft mbH 133        
Blue Stream Pipeline Co BV     692   12
Raffineria di Milazzo ScpA     85    
Trans Austria Gasleitung GmbH 171       5
Transmediterranean Pipeline Co Ltd 149       3
Other (*) 125 112 24 2 3
  648 113 971 2 24
Unconsolidated entities controlled by Eni          
Other (*) 78 34 1 2 3
  78 34 1 2 3
  726 147 972 4 27






(*)Each individual amount included herein does not exceed euro 50 million.

The most significant transactions with joint ventures, associates and non-consolidated subsidiaries included:consisted of the following:

F-96F-111


Most significant transactions with entities owned or controlled by the Government concerned the fair value of derivative financial instruments included in prices of electricity related to sale/purchase transactions with GSE - Gestore Servizi Elettrici.

Impact of transactions and positions with related parties on the balance sheet, net profit and loss account and statement of cash flows
The impact of transactions and positions with related parties on the balance sheet, net profit and loss account and statement of cash flows consisted of the following:

  

Dec. 31, 2006

Dec. 31, 2007

 

Dec. 31, 2008

Dec. 31, 2009

  
 
 
(euro million) Total Related parties Impact % Total Related parties Impact % Total Related parties Impact %
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Trade and other receivables 

18,799

 

1,027

 

5.46

 

20,676

 

1,616

 

7.82

 

22,222

 

1,539

 

6.93

 20,676 1,616 7.82 22,222 1,539 6.93 20,348 1,355 6.66
Other current assets 

855

 

4

 

0.47

 

1,080

     

2,349

 

59

 

2.51

 790     1,870 59 3.16 1,307 9 0.69
Other non-current financial assets 

805

 

136

 

16.89

 

923

 

87

 

9.43

 

1,134

 

356

 

31.39

 923 87 9.43 1,134 356 31.39 1,148 438 38.15
Other non-current assets 

994

     

1,110

 

16

 

1.44

 

1,401

 

21

 

1.50

 1,400 16 1.14 1,881 21 1.12 1,938 40 2.06
Current financial liabilities 

3,400

 

92

 

2.71

 

7,763

 

131

 

1.69

 

6,359

 

153

 

2.41

 7,763 131 1.69 6,359 153 2.41 3,545 147 4.15
Trade and other payables 

15,995

 

961

 

6.01

 

17,116

 

1,021

 

5.97

 

20,515

 

1,253

 

6.11

 17,116 1,021 5.97 20,515 1,253 6.11 19,174 1,241 6.47
Other liabilities 

634

 

4

 

0.63

 

1,556

 

4

 

0.26

 

4,319

 

4

 

0.09

 1,523 4 0.26 3,863 4 0.10 1,856 5 0.27
Long-term debt and current portion of long-term debt 

8,299

 

17

 

0.20

 

12,067

 

16

 

0.13

 

14,478

 

9

 

0.06

 12,067 16 0.13 14,478 9 0.06 21,255    
Other non-current liabilities 

418

 

56

 

13.40

 

2,031

 

57

 

2.81

 

2,538

 

53

 

2.09

 2,117 57 2.69 3,102 53 1.71 2,480 49 1.98
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The impact of transactions with related parties on the profit and loss accountsaccount consisted of the following:

Dec. 31, 2006

Dec. 31, 2007

Dec. 31, 2008




  

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
(euro million) Total Related parties Impact % Total Related parties Impact % Total Related parties Impact %
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net sales from operations 

86,105

 

3,974

 

4.62

 

87,256

 

4,198

 

4.81

 

108,148

 

5,048

 

4.67

  87,204 4,198 4.81 108,082 5,048 4.67 83,227 3,300 3.97
Other income and revenues 

783

   

..

 

827

   

..

 

720

 

39

 

5.42

  833   .. 728 39 5.36 1,118 26 2.33
Purchases, services and other 

57,490

 

2,720

 

4.73

 

58,179

 

3,777

 

6.49

 

76,408

 

6,298

 

8.24

  58,133 3,777 6.50 76,350 6,298 8.25 58,351 4,999 8.57
Other operating income (expense) (129) 10 .. (124) 58 .. 55 44 80.00
Financial income 

3,749

 

58

 

1.55

 

4,445

 

49

 

1.10

 

7,985

 

42

 

0.53

  4,445 49 1.10 7,985 42 0.53 5,950 27 0.45
Financial expense 

(3,971

) 

(18

) 

0.45

 

(4,554

) 

(20

) 

0.44

 

(8,198

) 

(17

) 

0.21

  (4,554) (20) 0.44 (8,198) (17) 0.21 (6,497) (4) 0.06
Gain (loss) on derivative financial instruments 

383

   

..

 

26

 

10

 

38.46

 

(551

) 

58

 

..

 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Transactions with related parties concernedduring the ordinary course of Eni’s business and were mainly conducted onat an arm’s length basis.

F-97


Main cash flows with related parties were as follows:

(euro million) 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
Revenues and other income 3,974  4,198  5,087 
Costs and other expenses (2,720) (3,777) (6,298)
Net change in trade and other receivables and liabilities 162  (492) 351 
Dividends and net interests 790  620  798 
Net cash provided from operating activities 2,206  549  (62)
Capital expenditures in tangible and intangible assets (733) (779) (2,022)
Investments (20) 8    
Change in accounts payable in relation to investments (276) (8) 27 
Change in financial receivables 343  (43) 397 
Net cash used in investing activities (686) (822) (1,598)
Change in financial liabilities (57) 20  14 
Net cash used in financing activities (57) 20  14 
Total financial flows to related parties 1,463  (253) (1,646)
(euro million) 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
Revenues and other income 4,198  5,087  3,326 
Costs and other expenses (3,777) (6,298) (4,999)
Other operating income (loss) 10  58  44 
Net change in trade and other receivables and liabilities (492) 351  34 
Dividends and net interests 610  740  407 
Net cash provided from operating activities 549  (62) (1,188)
Capital expenditures in tangible and intangible assets (779) (2,022) (1,364)
Investments 8       
Change in accounts payable in relation to investments (8) 27  19 
Change in financial receivables (43) 397  83 
Net cash used in investing activities (822) (1,598) (1,262)
Change in financial liabilities 20  14  (14)
Net cash used in financing activities 20  14  (14)
Total financial flows to related parties (253) (1,646) (2,464)
  
 
 

F-112


The impact on the statement of cash flows with related parties consisted of the following:

  

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
  

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
(euro million) Total Related parties Impact % Total Related parties Impact % Total Related parties Impact %
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash provided from operating activities 

17,001

 

2,206

 

12.98

 

15,517

 

549

 

3.54

 

21,801

 

(62

) 

..

  15,517 549 3.54 21,801 (62) .. 11,136 (1,188) ..
Cash used in investing activities 

(7,051

) 

(686

) 

9.73

 

(20,097

) 

(822

) 

4.09

 

(16,958

) 

(1,598

) 

9.42

  (20,097) (822) 4.09 (16,958) (1,598) 9.42 (10,254) (1,262) 12.31
Cash used in financing activities 

(7,097

) 

(57

) 

0.80

 

2,909

 

20

 

0.69

 

(5,025

) 

14

 

..

  2,909 20 0.69 (5,025) 14 .. (1,183) (14) 1.18
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



3837 Significant non-recurring events and operations

Non-recurring incomesincome (charges) consisted of the following:

(euro million) 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
Curtailment of post-retirement benefits for Italian employees    83    
Risk provisions for proceedings against Antitrust authorities (184) (130) (21)
Risk provisions for proceedings against the Italian Authority for Electricity and Gas (55) 39    
  (239) (8) (21)
(euro million) 

2007

 

2008

 

2009

  
 
 
Estimate of the charge from the possible resolution of the TSKJ matter       250 
Curtailment of post-retirement benefits for Italian employees 83       
Risk provisions for proceedings against Antitrust authorities (130) 21    
Risk provisions for proceedings against the Italian Authority for Electricity and Gas 39       
  (8) 21  250 
  
 
 

The estimate of the charge related to the TSKJ matter represents a charge in the amount of euro 250 million that was estimated based on management’s best estimate of the cost of the resolution of the TSKJ matter with U.S. Authorities. The matter is fully disclosed in Note 28 – Guarantees, commitments and risks – Legal Proceedings. The charge is recognized in the results of the Engineering & Construction segment as it relates to a project that was executed in Nigeria by the TSKJ joint venture. However, the charge will be incurred by Eni due to the contractual obligations assumed by Eni related to the indemnification of Saipem as part of the divestment of Snamprogetti. At the time of the project, the TSKJ venture was participated by Snamprogetti Netherlands BV which was controlled by Snamprogetti. As a result, the future monetary settlement of the provision will be incurred by Eni SpA and Saipem’s minorities will be left unaffected.

Non-recurring income related toconsists of a gain derivingresulting from the curtailment of the provisions accrued by Italian companies for employee termination indemnities ("TFR") following the changes introduced by Italian Budget Law for 2007 and related decrees (euro 83 million). Non recurringNon-recurring charges for 2007 concernedconsist of risk provisions related to ongoing antitrust proceedings against the European Antitrust authorities (euro 130 million) in the fields of paraffin and elastomers.

In 2006 a risk provision was made in connection with a proceeding against the Italian Antitrust authority regarding the field of supplies of jet fuel (euro 109 million). In addition a risk provision was made for an inquiry before the European Antitrust authorities in the field of elastomers (euro 75 million). In 2006 certain fines were imposed by the Authority for Electricity and Gas regarding an inquiry relating to the use of storage capacity in thermal year 2005-2006 (euro 45 million) and an inquiry relating to an information requirement on natural gas supplying prices (euro 10 million).

F-98





3938 Positions or transactions deriving from atypical and/or unusual operations

In 2006, 2007 and in 2008There were no positions or transactions deriving from atypical and/or unusual operations were reported.for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009.


Recent developments
On February 4, 2010, Eni formally presented to the European Commission a set of structural remedies relating certain international gas pipelines. With prior agreement from its partners, Eni committed to dispose of its interests in the German TENP, in the Swiss Transitgas and in the Austrian TAG gas pipelines. The European Commission intends to submit these remedies to a market test. In case the Commission approves those remedies upon conclusion of the market test, Eni will be in the position to resolve an inquiry started in May 2006 for alleged infringements of the European antitrust regulations in the gas sector, which involved the main players in European gas market. Eni

On April 7, 2009 Gazprom exercised its call optionF-113


received a statement of objections from the European Commission which alleged that during the 2000-2005 period Eni was responsible for limiting the access of third parties to purchasethe gas pipelines TAG, TENP and Transitgas, thus restricting gas availability in Italy. Given the strategic importance of the Austrian TAG pipeline, which transports gas from Russia to Italy, Eni has negotiated a 20% interest in OAO Gazprom Neft held by Eni following agreements betweensolution with the two partners. The 20% interest in Gazprom Neft was acquired by Eni on April 4, 2007 as part of a bid procedureCommission which calls for the assetstransfer of bankrupt Russian company Yukos. The exercise price ofits stake to an entity controlled by the call option is equal toItalian State. In case they are implemented, the bid price (U.S. $ 3.7 billion)remedies negotiated with the Commission will not affect Eni’s contractual gas transport rights. Management expects that a possible divestiture will occur as adjusted by subtracting dividends distributed and adding the contractual yearly remuneration of 9.4% on the capital employed and related financing expenses. At the same time, Eni and Gazprom signed new cooperation agreements targeting certain development projects to be conducted jointly in Russia and other countries of interest. Terms of the call option granted to Gazprom to purchase a 51% interest in the share capital of OOO SeverEnergia, which owns 100% of the three abovementioned Russian companies engaging in gas development, are currently under review by Eni, Enel and Gazprom.

On March 19, 2009, a mandatory tender offer on the minorities of Distrigas was finalized. Shareholders representing 41.61% of the share capital of Distrigas tendered 292,390 shares on Eni’s offer. Publigaz Scrl tendered its entire interest (31.25%). The transaction has been accounted in Eni financial statementsearly as at March 31, 2009. On April 8, 2009 Eni paid tothe beginning of 2011 and as such the profit and loss for the year 2010 will report the full-year results of Eni’s share of profit in those shareholders cash consideration amounting to euro 1,991 million. Following the tender offer, Eni owns 98.86% of the share capital of Distrigas. The squeeze-out on the residual 1.14% of the share capital has been completed early in May. Consequently Eni holds all the shares of Distrigas except for one share belonging to the Belgian State with special powers. Distrigas shares has been delisted from Euronext Brussels.entities. For further details on this transactionthe matter see "Item 48Gas & Power"Legal Proceedings".

On February 12,Management intends to divest a stake in its fully-consolidated subsidiary GreenStream where the Company currently owns a 75% stake. Following the intended divestment, the Company expects to account for the entity in accordance with the equity-method of accounting. At December 31, 2009, Eni’s Boardincluded as part of Directors approvedtotal assets and total liabilities in the divestment of 100% of Italgas SpA and Stoccaggi Gas Italia SpA (Stogit)Consolidated Financial Statements in respect to Snam Rete Gas (50.03% owned by Eni) for total cash consideration ofthe Company’s investment in GreenStream are euro 4,720 million (euro 3,070673 million and euro 1,650525 million, respectively). The transaction will be financed by Snam Rete Gas through: (i) a rights issue up for a maximum of euro 3.5 billion (Eni has already committed to subscribe its relative share of the rights issue); and (ii) new medium to long-term financing for euro 1.3 billion. The main impacts expected on Eni's consolidated financial statements when the transaction closes will be: (i) a decrease of euro 1.5 billion in net borrowings and a corresponding increase in total equity as a consequence of the pro-quota subscription of the Snam Rete Gas capital increase by the minority shareholders; and (ii) a decrease in Eni’s net profit equal to 45% of the aggregate net profit of Italgas and Stogit, with a corresponding increase in net profit attributable to minorities. From an industrial perspective the transaction, expected to close in July 2009, will create significant synergies in the regulated businesses segment and maximize the value of Italgas and Stogit due to the higher visibility of regulated businesses as a part of Snam Rete Gas. For further details on this transaction see "Item 4 – Gas & Power".respectively.

By the end of May 2008, based on the approval of the full year dividend proposal made by theThe Company’s Annual General Shareholders Meeting scheduled on April 30, 2009,29, 2010, is due to approve the full year dividend proposal. Eni expects to pay the balance of the dividend for fiscal year 20082009 amounting to euro 0.650.50 per share.share in May. Total cash out is estimated at euro 2.361.81 billion.

F-99


Supplemental oil and gas information (unaudited)
The following information pursuant to "International Financial Reporting Standards" (IFRS) is presented in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 69, "Disclosures aboutSFAB Extractive Activities - Oil & Gas Producing Activities"(Topic 932). Amounts related to minority interests are not significant.

Capitalized costs
Capitalized costs represent the total expenditures for proved and unproved mineral interests and related support equipment and facilities utilized in oil and gas exploration and production activities, together with related accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization. Capitalized costs by geographical area consist of the following:

(euro million) 

Italy

 

North AfricaRest of Europe

 

WestNorth Africa

 

North SeaWest Africa

 

Caspian Area Kazakhstan (1)

 

Rest of WorldAsia

Americas

Australia and Oceania

 Total consolidated subsidiaries Total joint ventures and associates affiliates (2)
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


December 31, 2007                 
Proved mineral interests 10,571 8,118 8,506 8,672 1,447 7,718 45,032 790 
Unproved mineral interests 32 120 1,030 330 35 2,582 4,129 1,089 
Support equipment and facilities 279 1,125 443 16 41 59 1,963 10 
Incomplete wells and other 726 562 1,078 75 1,852 808 5,101 112 
Gross capitalized costs 11,608 9,925 11,057 9,093 3,375 11,167 56,225 2,001 
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization (7,440) (4,960) (5,340) (5,670) (445) (4,909) (28,764) (345)
Net capitalized costs (a) (b) 4,168 4,965 5,717 3,423 2,930 6,258 27,461 1,656 
December 31, 2008                                      
Proved mineral interests 10,772 10,116 11,368 7,499 2,130 8,954 50,839 813  10,772 7,852 10,116 11,368 1,663 3,939 4,737 392 50,839 813 
Unproved mineral interests 32 638 2,267 316 1,051 2,908 7,212 928  32 316 638 2,267 37 1,461 2,418 43 7,212 928 
Support equipment and facilities 283 1,205 520 16 51 71 2,146 14  283 24 1,205 520 51 16 43 4 2,146 14 
Incomplete wells and other 1,374 1,006 1,443 159 2,631 1,797 8,410 267  1,374 249 1,006 1,443 2,631 713 632 362 8,410 267 
Gross capitalized costs 12,461 12,965 15,598 7,990 5,863 13,730 68,607 2,022 
Gross Capitalized Costs 12,461 8,441 12,965 15,598 4,382 6,129 7,830 801 68,607 2,022 
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization (7,943) (6,318) (7,027) (5,132) (858) (6,932) (34,210) (441) (7,943) (5,327) (6,318) (7,027) (560) (3,224) (3,638) (173) (34,210) (441)
Net capitalized costs (a) (b) 4,518 6,647 8,571 2,858 5,005 6,798 34,397 1,581 
Net Capitalized Costs (a) (b) 4,518 3,114 6,647 8,571 3,822 2,905 4,192 628 34,397 1,581 
December 31, 2009                     
Proved mineral interests 10,079 9,472 11,122 14,011 1,723 4,566 5,750 1,338 58,061 791 
Unproved mineral interests 33 305 580 1,854 36 1,518 2,144 38 6,508 443 
Support equipment and facilities 273 31 1,287 585 57 17 45 4 2,299 13 
Incomplete wells and other 1,028 329 1,228 934 3,481 316 600 14 7,930 358 
Gross Capitalized Costs 11,413 10,137 14,217 17,384 5,297 6,417 8,539 1,394 74,798 1,605 
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization (7,557) (6,824) (7,044) (8,424) (620) (3,679) (4,673) (379) (39,200) (485)
Net Capitalized Costs (a) (b) (c) 3,856 3,313 7,173 8,960 4,677 2,738 3,866 1,015 35,598 1,120 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
iii
(1)Eni's capitalized costs of the Kashagan field are determined based on Eni shareof 16.81%.
(2)The amounts of joint ventures and affiliates as at December 31, 2009 includes 29.4% of the three Russian companies former Yukos as a result of the Gazprom call option on the 51% of the shares (2007 and 2008 are reported at 60%).
(a)iThe amounts include net capitalized financial charges totaling euro 441 million in 2007 and euro 537 million in 2008.2008 and euro 570 million in 2009.
(b)iThe amounts do not include costs associated with exploration activities which are capitalized in order to reflect their investment nature and amortized in full when incurred. The application of the "Successful Effort Method" application would have led to an increase in net capitalized costs of euro 2,547 million in 2007 and euro 3,308 million in 2008 and euro 3,690 million in 2009 for the consolidated companies and of euro 94 million in 2007 and euro 48 million in 2008 and euro 76 million in 2009 for joint ventures and associates.affiliates.
(1)(c)iEni'sAmounts of 2009 do not include the capitalized costs related to the Italian gas storage activities, following restructuring of the Kashagan field are determined based on Eni's share of 16.81% as of December 31, 2008 and 18.52%Eni regulated gas businesses in the previous year.
(2)iThe amounts of joint ventures and associates as at December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2008 include 60% of the three Russian companies former Yukos purchasedItaly now reported in 2007, for which Gazprom has a call option of 51%.Gas & Power segment.

F-100

F-114


CostsCost incurred
Costs incurred represent amounts both capitalized and expensed in connection with oil and gas producing activities. Costs incurred by geographical area consist of the following:

(euro million) 

Italy

 

North AfricaRest of Europe

 

WestNorth Africa

 

North SeaWest Africa

 

Caspian
Area
Kazakhstan (1)

 

Rest of WorldAsia

Americas

Australia and Oceania

 Total consolidated subsidiaries Total joint ventures and associates affiliates (2)
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


2006                
Proved property acquisitions 139 10         149  
Unproved property acquisitions           3 3  
Exploration 128 270 471 174 25 280 1,348 26
Development (a) 1,120 892 956 478 595 766 4,807 31
Total costs incurred 1,387 1,172 1,427 652 620 1,049 6,307 57
2007                                    
Proved property acquisitions (b)   11 451     1,395 1,857 187     11 451     1,395   1,857 187
Unproved property acquisitions (b)     510     1,417 1,927 1,086       510     1,417   1,927 1,086
Exploration (b) 104 380 298 193 36 1,181 2,192 42 104 195 373 305 36 162 980 37 2,192 42
Development (a) (b) 320 1,047 1,425 518 744 1,185 5,239 156 320 557 1,047 1,425 744 247 734 165 5,239 156
Total costs incurred 424 1,438 2,684 711 780 5,178 11,215 1,471 424 752 1,431 2,691 780 409 4,526 202 11,215 1,471
2008                                    
Proved property acquisitions (b)   626 413   173 83 1,295       626 413   256     1,295  
Unproved property acquisitions (b)   384 655 33 647   1,719     33 384 655   647     1,719  
Exploration (b) 135 421 581 214 144 719 2,214 48 135 227 403 600 16 345 440 48 2,214 48
Development (a) (b) 644 1,388 1,884 850 1,208 1,593 7,567 163 644 957 1,388 1,884 1,023 598 748 325 7,567 163
Total costs incurred 779 2,819 3,533 1,097 2,172 2,395 12,795 211 779 1,217 2,801 3,552 1,039 1,846 1,188 373 12,795 211
2009                    
Proved property acquisitions (b)     298 27   11 131   467  
Unproved property acquisitions (b)     54 42   83 43   222  
Exploration (b) 40 114 317 284 20 159 242 52 1,228 41
Development (a) 742 727 1,401 2,121 1,086 423 858 462 7,820 206
Total costs incurred 782 841 2,070 2,474 1,106 676 1,274 514 9,737 247
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
iii
(1)iEni’sEni's incurred costs incurred of the Kashagan field are determined based on Eni’sEni shareof 16.81% as ofat December 31, 2008 and 2009 and 18.52% in the previous year.as at December 2007.
(2)iThe amounts of joint ventures and associates foraffiliates as at December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2008 include 60%2009 includes 29.4% of the three Russian companies former Yukos purchased in 2007, for whichas a result of the Gazprom has a call option on the 51% of 51%the shares (2007 and 2008 are reported at 60%).
(a)iIncludes the abandonment costs of the assets for euro 1,170 million in 2006, euro 173 million in 2007, and euro 628 million in 2008 and euro 16301 million for joint ventures and associates.in 2009.
(b)iOf which business combination:
(euro million) 

Italy

 

North AfricaRest of Europe

 

WestNorth Africa

 

North SeaWest Africa

 

Caspian AreaKazakhstan (1)

 

Rest of WorldAsia

Americas

Australia and Oceania

 Total consolidated subsidiaries Total joint ventures and associatesaffiliates (2)
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


2007                                    
Proved property acquisitions     451     1,395 1,846 187       451     1,395   1,846 187
Unproved property acquisitions     510     1,334 1,844 1,086       510     1,334   1,844 1,086
Exploration     59     474 533         59     474   533  
Development     10     345 355 101       10     345   355 101
Total     1,030     3,548 4,578 1,374       1,030     3,548   4,578 1,374
2008                                    
Proved property acquisitions     298   173 83 554         298   256     554  
Unproved property acquisitions   384 560 33 647   1,624     33 384 560   647     1,624  
Exploration   23 115   116 42 296       23 115   158     296  
Development   132 4 52 156 77 421     52 132 4   233     421  
Total   539 977 85 1,092 202 2,895     85 539 977   1,294     2,895  










Results of operations from oil and gas producing activities

Results of operations from oil and gas producing activities, including gas storage services used to modulate the seasonal variation of demand, represent only those revenues and expenses directly associated with such activities, including operating overheads. These amounts do not include any allocation of interest expense or general corporate overhead and, therefore, are not necessarily indicative of the contributions to consolidated net earnings of Eni. Related income taxes are computed by applying the local income tax rates to the pre-tax income from producing activities. Eni is a party to certain Production Sharing Agreements (PSAs), whereby a portion of Eni’s share of oil and gas production is withheld and sold by its joint venture partners which are state-owned entities, with proceeds being remitted to the state in satisfaction of Eni’s PSA-relatedPSA-related tax liabilities. Revenue and income taxes include such taxes owed by Eni but paid by state-owned entities out of Eni’s share of oil and gas production.

F-101F-115


Results of operations from oil and gas producing activities by geographical area consist of the following:

(euro million) 

Italy

 

North AfricaRest of Europe

 

WestNorth Africa

 

North SeaWest Africa

 

Caspian
Area
Kazakhstan (1)

 

Rest of WorldAsia

Americas

Australia and Oceania

 Total consolidated subsidiaries Total joint ventures and associates affiliates (2)Total consolidated subsidiaries, joint ventures and affiliates
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



2006                 
Revenues                                        
Sales to consolidated entities 

3,601

 

4,185

 

4,817

 

3,295

 

261

 

712

 

16,871

    3,171 3,273 3,000 4,439 296 44 229 91 14,543   14,543 
Sales to third parties 

184

 

3,012

 

967

 

983

 

721

 

1,873

 

7,740

 

120

  163 755 4,793 693 833 961 1,112 187 9,497 176 9,673 
Total revenues 

3,785

 

7,197

 

5,784

 

4,278

 

982

 

2,585

 

24,611

 

120

  3,334 4,028 7,793 5,132 1,129 1,005 1,341 278 24,040 176 24,216 
Operation costs 

(249

) 

(496

) 

(475

) 

(481

) 

(147

) 

(191

) 

(2,039

) 

(18

)
Operations costs (248) (584) (542) (499) (142) (39) (177) (50) (2,281) (27) (2,308)
Production taxes 

(181

) 

(95

) 

(475

)     

(82

) 

(833

) 

(3

) (188)   (91) (473)   (28)     (780) (6) (786)
Exploration expenses 

(137

) 

(273

) 

(186

) 

(160

) 

(25

) 

(293

) 

(1,074

) 

(26

) (108) (196) (379) (297) (36) (168) (566) (27) (1,777) (42) (1,819)
D.D. & A. and provision for abandonment (a) 

(457

) 

(795

) 

(737

) 

(684

) 

(80

) 

(895

) 

(3,648

) 

(43

)
Other income and (expenses) 

(315

) 

(569

) 

(190

) 

57

 

(89

) 

(283

) 

(1,389

) 

8

 
Pretax income from producing activities 

2,446

 

4,969

 

3,721

 

3,010

 

641

 

841

 

15,628

 

38

 
Income taxes 

(909

) 

(2,980

) 

(2,133

) 

(1,840

) 

(223

) 

(381

) 

(8,466

) 

(31

)
Results of operations from E&P activities (b) 

1,537

 

1,989

 

1,588

 

1,170

 

418

 

460

 

7,162

 

7

 
2007                 
Revenues                 
Sales to consolidated entities 

3,171

 

3,000

 

4,439

 

3,125

 

296

 

512

 

14,543

   
Sales to third parties 

163

 

4,793

 

693

 

755

 

833

 

2,260

 

9,497

 

176

 
Total revenues 

3,334

 

7,793

 

5,132

 

3,880

 

1,129

 

2,772

 

24,040

 

176

 
Operation costs 

(248

) 

(542

) 

(499

) 

(579

) 

(142

) 

(271

) 

(2,281

) 

(27

)
Production taxes 

(188

) 

(91

) 

(473

)     

(28

) 

(780

) 

(6

)
Exploration expenses 

(108

) 

(385

) 

(291

) 

(193

) 

(36

) 

(764

) 

(1,777

) 

(42

)
D.D. & A. and provision for abandonment (a) 

(499

) 

(768

) 

(685

) 

(729

) 

(76

) 

(989

) 

(3,746

) 

(51

)
D.D. & A. and Provision for abandonment (a) (499) (766) (768) (685) (76) (422) (511) (19) (3,746) (51) (3,797)
Other income and (expenses) 

(283

) 

(627

) 

(297

) 

(45

) 

(72

) 

(243

) 

(1,567

) 

(18

) (283) (83) (627) (285) (72) (134) (18) (65) (1,567) (18) (1,585)
Pretax income from producing activities 

2,008

 

5,380

 

2,887

 

2,334

 

803

 

477

 

13,889

 

32

  2,008 2,399 5,386 2,893 803 214 69 117 13,889 32 13,921 
Income taxes 

(746

) 

(3,102

) 

(1,820

) 

(1,419

) 

(284

) 

(241

) 

(7,612

) 

(49

) (746) (1,447) (3,102) (1,820) (284) (93) (110) (10) (7,612) (49) (7,661)
Results of operations from E&P activities (b) 

1,262

 

2,278

 

1,067

 

915

 

519

 

236

 

6,277

 

(17

) 1,262 952 2,284 1,073 519 121 (41) 107 6,277 (17) 6,260 
2008                                        
Revenues                                        
Sales to consolidated entities 

3,956

 

2,622

 

5,013

 

3,691

 

360

 

629

 

16,271

    3,956 3,892 2,622 5,013 360 39 323 66 16,271   16,271 
Sales to third parties 

126

 

7,286

 

1,471

 

121

 

1,288

 

2,928

 

13,220

 

265

  126 160 7,286 1,471 1,025 1,335 1,599 218 13,220 265 13,485 
Total revenues 

4,082

 

9,908

 

6,484

 

3,812

 

1,648

 

3,557

 

29,491

 

265

  4,082 4,052 9,908 6,484 1,385 1,374 1,922 284 29,491 265 29,756 
Operation costs 

(260

) 

(528

) 

(609

) 

(515

) 

(173

) 

(326

) 

(2,411

) 

(34

)
Operations costs (260) (521) (528) (609) (157) (68) (233) (35) (2,411) (34) (2,445)
Production taxes 

(195

) 

(32

) 

(616

)     

(35

) 

(878

) 

(53

) (195)   (32) (616)   (35)     (878) (53) (931)
Exploration expenses 

(135

) 

(425

) 

(529

) 

(215

) 

(57

) 

(697

) 

(2,058

) 

(48

) (135) (228) (406) (548) (16) (232) (435) (58) (2,058) (48) (2,106)
D.D. & A. and provision for abandonment (a) 

(551

) 

(1,120

) 

(1,115

) 

(782

) 

(331

) 

(1,490

) 

(5,389

) 

(84

)
D.D. & A. and Provision for abandonment (a) (551) (829) (1,120) (1,115) (79) (823) (837) (35) (5,389) (84) (5,473)
Other income and (expenses) 

(420

) 

(936

) 

(279

) 

(63

) 

(286

) 

(270

) 

(2,254

) 

(15

) (420) (56) (934) (268) (270) (259) (6) (41) (2,254) (15) (2,269)
Pretax income from producing activities 

2,521

 

6,867

 

3,336

 

2,237

 

801

 

739

 

16,501

 

31

  2,521 2,418 6,888 3,328 863 (43) 411 115 16,501 31 16,532 
Income taxes 

(924

) 

(4,170

) 

(2,262

) 

(1,581

) 

(315

) 

(435

) 

(9,687

) 

(49

) (924) (1,623) (4,170) (2,262) (302) (122) (214) (70) (9,687) (49) (9,736)
Results of operations from E&P activities (b) 

1,597

 

2,697

 

1,074

 

656

 

486

 

304

 

6,814

 

(18

)
Total results of operations from E&P activities (b) 1,597 795 2,718 1,066 561 (165) 197 45 6,814 (18) 6,796 
2009                       
Revenues                       
Sales to consolidated entities 2,274 2,583 1,738 4,386 245 41 808 29 12,104   12,104 
Sales to third parties   540 5,037 586 739 1,208 639 181 8,930 232 9,162 
Total revenues 2,274 3,123 6,775 4,972 984 1,249 1,447 210 21,034 232 21,266 
Operations costs (271) (517) (553) (749) (153) (78) (273) (41) (2,635) (34) (2,669)
Production taxes (148)   (20) (445)   (34)     (647) (44) (691)
Exploration expenses (40) (114) (319) (451) (20) (204) (341) (62) (1,551) (41) (1,592)
D.D. & A. and Provision for abandonment (a) (463) (921) (956) (1,502) (78) (535) (1,108) (186) (5,749) (76) (5,825)
Other income and (expenses) (125) (134) (471) (467) (186) (17) 170 (47) (1,277) (41) (1,318)
Pretax income from producing activities 1,227 1,437 4,456 1,358 547 381 (105) (126) 9,175 (4) 9,171 
Income taxes (467) (833) (3,010) (1,042) (180) (67) (2) 23 (5,578) (40) (5,618)
Results of operations from E&P activities (b) (c) 760 604 1,446 316 367 314 (107) (103) 3,597 (44) 3,553 
 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
iii
(1)Eni's results of operations of the Kashagan field are determined based on Eni shareof 16.81% as at December 2008 and 2009 and 18.52% as at December 2007.
(2)The amounts of joint ventures and affiliates as at December 31, 2009 includes 29.4% of the three Russian companies former Yukos as a result of the Gazprom call option on the 51% of the shares (2007 and 2008 are reported at 60%).
(a)iIncludes asset impairments amounting to euro 130 million in 2006, euro 91 million in 2007, and euro 770 million in 2008.2008 and euro 576 million in 2009.
(b)iThe "Successful Effort Method" application would have led to an increase in resultsof result of operations of euro 220 million in 2006, euro 438 million in 2007, and euro 408 million in 2008 and euro 320 million in 2009 for the consolidated companies and of euro 15 million in 2006, euro 26 million in 2007 and noany variation in 2008 and euro 26 million in 2009 for joint ventures and associates.affiliates.
(1)(c)iEni'sAmounts of 2009 do not include results of operationsoperation related to the Italian gas storage activities, following the restructuring of the Kashagan field are determined based on Eni’s share of 16.81% as of December 31, 2008 and 18.52%Eni's regulated gas businesses in Italy now reported in the previous year.
(2)iThe amounts of joint ventures and associates for December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2008 include 60% of the three Russian companies formerly part of Yukos purchased in 2007, for which Gazprom has a call option of 51%.Gas & Power segment.

F-102F-116


Average sale prices and production costs per unit of production

(euro million)($)

Italy

Rest of Europe

 

North Africa

 

West Africa

 

North SeaKazakhstan

Caspian Area 

Rest of WorldAsia

Americas

Australia and Oceania

 

Total



 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2006                
Average sales prices                
Oil and condensates per BBL ($) 55.22 60.99 61.55 62.18 53.18 57.15 60.09
Natural gas. per KCF   8.23 4.17 1.05 6.89 0.39 5.09 5.29
Average production costs per BOE   6.36 3.87 9.02 6.03 5.02 4.52 5.79
2007                
Average sales prices                
Oil and condensates per BBL ($) 62.47 67.86 69.77 69.40 59.34 68.63 67.70
Natural gas. per KCF   8.58 4.60 1.21 6.53 0.41 5.53 5.42
Average production costs per BOE   7.89 4.22 11.53 8.56 4.90 5.33 6.90
2008 (a)                
Average sales prices                
Oil and condensates per BBL ($) 84.87 84.71 91.58 71.90 80.43 82.06 84.05
Natural gas. per KCF   13.06 7.14 1.50 10.21 0.53 7.56 8.01
Average production costs per BOE   9.40 3.66 15.25 8.99 5.79 6.92 7.77
    
 
 
 
 
 
 
(a)In 2008 Eni’s liquid realizations amounted to $84.05 per barrel and were reduced by approximately $4.13 per barrel due to the settlement of certain commodity derivatives relating to the sale of 46 mmBBL in the year. This was part of a derivative transaction the Company entered into to hedge exposure to variability in future cash flows expected from the sale of a portion of the Company’s proved reserves for an original amount of approximately 125.7 mmBBL in the 2008-2011 period, decreasing to 79.7 mmBBL by the end of December 2008.
2007                  
Oil and condensate, per BBL 62.47 70.84 67.86 69.77 59.34 64.73 66.37 71.23 67.70
Natural gas, per KCF 8.58 6.71 4.60 1.21 0.41 4.34 6.69 5.94 5.42
Average production cost, per BOE 7.89 8.35 4.22 11.53 4.90 3.13 7.17 10.35 6.90
2008                  
Oil and condensate, per BBL 84.87 71.90 84.71 91.58 79.06 75.08 88.69 82.80 84.05
Natural gas, per KCF 13.06 10.55 7.14 1.50 0.53 5.50 8.81 9.59 8.01
Average production cost, per BOE 9.40 8.67 3.66 15.25 5.86 3.69 10.27 8.50 7.77
2009                  
Oil and condensate, per BBL 56.02 56.46 55.97 59.75 52.34 55.23 55.74 50.40 56.95
Natural gas, per KCF 9.01 7.06 5.78 1.66 0.45 4.30 4.05 8.14 5.62
Average production cost, per BOE 9.69 8.28 4.05 13.15 5.20 3.49 8.25 9.56 7.49
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Oil and natural gas reserves
Eni’s criteria concerning evaluation and classification of proved developed and undeveloped reserves follow Regulation S-X 4-10 of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission have been disclosed in accordance with FASB Extractive Activities - Oil & Gas (Topic 932).

Proved oil and gas reserves are the estimatedthose quantities of crude oil naturaland gas, and natural gas liquids which, geologicalby analysis of geoscience and engineering data, demonstratecan be estimated with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future yearseconomically producible, from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under technical, contractual,existing economic conditions, operating methods, and operatinggovernment regulations, prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the estimation. The project to extract the hydrocarbons must have commenced or the operator must be reasonably certain that it will commence the project within a reasonable time.

Existing economic conditions existinginclude prices and costs at which economic producibility from a reservoir is to be determined. The price16 shall be the time. Prices include considerationaverage price during the 12-month period prior to the ending date of changes in existingthe period covered by the report, determined as an unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within such period, unless prices provided onlyare defined by contractual arrangements, but not of increasesexcluding escalations based upon future conditions.

Net proved reserves exclude royaltiesinterests and interestsroyalties owned by others.

Proved reserves are classified as either developed or undeveloped.

Developed oil and gas reserves are proved reserves that can be estimatedexpected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods.methods or in which the cost of the required equipment is relatively minor compared to the cost of a new well.

Proved undevelopedUndeveloped oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for completion.recompletion.

Additional oil and gas reserves expected to be obtained through the application of fluid injection or other improved recovery techniques for supplementing natural forces and mechanisms of primary recovery are included as proved developed reserves only after testing by a pilot project or after the operation of an installed program has confirmed, through production response, that increased recovery will be achieved.

Eni’s proved reserves have been estimated on the basis of the applicable U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission regulation, Rule 4-10 of Regulation S-X and its interpretations and have been disclosed in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 69. The estimates of proved reserves, developed and undeveloped, for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008 are based on data prepared by Eni. Since 1991 Eni has requested qualified independent oil engineering companies to carry out an independent evaluation1617 of part of its proved reserves on a rotationrotational basis. Eni believes these independent evaluators to be experienced and qualifiedThe description of qualifications of the person primarily responsible of the reserve audit is included in the marketplace. third party audit report18.

In the preparation of their reports, these independent evaluators relied,rely, without independent verification, upon information furnished by Eni with respect to property interest, production, current cost of operation and development, sale agreements, relating to future operations and sale prices and other factual information and data that were accepted as represented by the independent evaluators. This information was the sameThese data, equally used by Eni in determining proved reserves and include: log,its internal process, include logs, directional surveys, core and PVT (Pressure Volume Temperature) analysis, maps, oil/gas/water production/injection data of wells, reservoirs and fields, reservoir studies,studies; technical analysis relevant to field performance, reservoir performance, budget data per field, long-term development plans, future capital and operating costs.


(16)In prior periods, year-end liquids and natural gas prices were used in the estimate of proved reserves.
(17)From 1991 to 2002 DeGolyer and MacNaughton, from 2003 also Ryder Scott.
(18)The reports of independent engineers are available on Eni website www.eni.com, section Documentation/Annual Report 2009.

F-117


In order to calculate the economic value of reserve NPV,Eni equity reserves, actual prices received fromapplicable to hydrocarbon sales, instructions on future prices,price adjustments required by applicable contractual arrangements, and other pertinent information are provided. Accordingly, the work performed


(16)From 1991 to 2002 by DeGolyer and MacNaughton, from 2003 also by Ryder Scott Company.

F-103


by theIn 2009 Ryder Scott Company and DeGolyer and MacNaughton19 provided an independent evaluators is an evaluation of Eni’s proved reserves carried out in parallel with the internal one. The circumstance that the independent evaluations achieved the same results as thosealmost 28% of the Company for the vast majority of fields support the management’s confidence that the company’s booked reserves meet the regulatory definition of proved reserves which are reasonably certain to be produced in the future. When the assessment of independent engineers is lower than internal evaluations, Eni revises its estimates based on information provided by independent evaluators. In particular, in 2008, a total of 1.5 BBOE of proved reserves, or about 22% of Eni’sEni's total proved reserves atas of December 31, 2008, have been evaluated. The results of this independent evaluation have essentially confirmed,200920 confirming, as in previous years, the reasonableness of Eni's internal assessment. evaluations.

In the 2006-2008 three-yearthree year period 77%from 2007 to 2009, 86% of Eni’sEni's total proved reserves were subject to independent evaluations. In the last three years,evaluation.

As of December 31, 2009 among the most important of Eni’sEni properties, as at December 31, 2008the only one which werewas not subject to an independent evaluation were: Bouri and Bu Attifel (Libya),review was Barbara (Italy), M’Boundi (Congo) and Elgin-Franklin (UK).

Eni operates under Production Sharing Agreements, (PSAs)PSAs, in several of the foreign jurisdictions where it has oil and gas exploration and production activities. Reserves of oil and natural gas to which Eni is entitled under PSA arrangements are shown in accordance with Eni’s economic interest in the volumes of oil and natural gas estimated to be recoverable in future years. Such reserves include estimated quantities allocated to Eni for recovery of costs, income taxes owed by Eni but settled by its joint venture partners (which are state-owned entities) out of Eni’s share of production and Eni’s net equity share after cost recovery.

Proved oil and gas reserves associated with PSAs represented 53%46%, 46%54% and 54%57% of total proved reserves as of year-end 2006,December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2008,2009, respectively, on an oil-equivalent basis.

ProvedSimilar effects as PSAs apply to service and "buy-back" contracts; proved reserves associated with service and "Buy-Back"such contracts represented 2%1%, 1%2% and 2% of total proved reserves on an oil-equivalent basis as of year-end 2006,December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2008,2009, respectively.

Oil and gas reserve quantities include: (i) oil and natural gas quantities in excess of cost recovery which the company has an obligation to purchase under certain PSAs with governments or authorities, whereby the company serves as producer of reserves. Reserve volumes associated with oil and gas deriving from such obligationsobligation represent 1.1%1.8%, 1.8%0.1% and 0.1%0.3% of total proved reserves as of year-end 2006,December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2008,2009, respectively, on an oil-equivalent basis; (ii) volumes of natural gas used for own consumption;consumption, (iii) the quantities of natural gas produced to feed the Angola LNG plant; and (iii)(iv) volumes of natural gas held in certain of Eni’sEni storage fields in Italy. Proved reserves attributable to these fields include: (a) the residual natural gas volumes of the reservoirsreservoirs; and (b) natural gas volumes from other Eni fields input into these reservoirs in subsequent periods. Proved reserves do not include volumes owned by or acquired byfrom third parties. Gas withdrawn from storage is produced and thereby removed from proved reserves when sold.

Numerous uncertainties are inherent in estimating quantities of proved reserves, and in projecting future rates of productionproductions and timing of development expenditures. The accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data and engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. ResultsThe results of drilling, testing and production after the date of the estimate may require substantial upward or downward revision.revisions. In addition, changes in oil and natural gas prices have an effect on the quantities of Eni’s proved reserves since estimates of reserves are based on prices and costs relevant atto the date when such estimates are made. Consequently, the evaluation of reserves evaluation could also diverge significantly differ from actual oil and natural gas volumes whichthat will be actually produced.


(19)The reports of independent engineers are available on Eni website www.eni.com, section Documentation/Annual Report 2009.
(20)Including reserves of joint ventures and affiliates.

F-118


The following table presentstables present yearly changes in estimated proved reserves, developed and undeveloped, of crude oil (including condensate and natural gas liquids) and natural gas for the years 2006,as of December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2008.2009.

F-104


Crude oil (including condensate and natural gas liquids)

Proved oil reserves(mmBBL) 

Italy

 

North AfricaRest of Europe

 

WestNorth Africa

 

North SeaWest Africa

 

Caspian
Area
Kazakhstan (1)

 

Rest of WorldAsia

Americas

Australia and Oceania

 Total consolidated subsidiaries Total joint ventures and associates affiliates (2)
(mmBBL) 







Total consolidated subsidiaries, joint ventures and affiliates
Reserves at December 31, 2005 228 961 936 433 778 412 3,748 25 
Revisions of Previous Estimates (a) 15 61 (85) 20 72 (19) 64 1 
Improved Recovery   49 41   14   104 1 
Extensions and Discoveries   30 11   52 10 103   
Production (28) (119) (117) (65) (23) (38) (390) (3)
Sales of Minerals in Place (b)       (2)   (170) (172)   
Reserves at December 31, 2006 215 982 786 386 893 195 3,457 24  215 386 982 786 893 62 98 35 3,457 24 3,481 
of which:
developed
 136 329 713 546 262 53 54 33 2,126 18 2,144 
undeveloped 79 57 269 240 631 9 44 2 1,331 6 1,337 
Purchase of Minerals in Place     32     54 86 101        32     54   86 101 187 
Revisions of Previous Estimates 28 (35 (26) 14 (114) (31) (164) 20  28 14 (35) (26) (114) (6) (23) (2) (164) 20 (144)
Improved Recovery   9 12 1     22 1    1 9 12         22 1 23 
Extensions and Discoveries   43 22 1   29 95 1    1 43 22     28 1 95 1 96 
Production (28) (121) (101) (57) (26) (36) (369) (5) (28) (57) (121) (101) (26) (12) (19) (5) (369) (5) (374)
Reserves at December 31, 2007 215 878 725 345 753 211 3,127 142  215 345 878 725 753 44 138 29 3,127 142 3,269 
of which:
developed
 133 299 649 511 219 35 81 26 1,953 26 1,979 
undeveloped 82 46 229 214 534 9 57 3 1,174 116 1,290 
Purchase of Minerals in Place     32   32 4 68          32   36     68   68 
Revisions of Previous Estimates (8) 56 80 (31) 238 56 391 4  (8) (30) 56 80 239 42 11 1 391 4 395 
Improved Recovery   7 25       32 1      7 25         32 1 33 
Extensions and Discoveries 4 4 26 13 2 3 52    4 13 4 26   2 3   52   52 
Production (25) (122) (105) (51) (30) (38) (371) (5) (25) (51) (122) (105) (25) (18) (21) (4) (371) (5) (376)
Sales of Minerals in Place         (56)   (56)            (56)       (56)   (56 
Reserves at December 31, 2008 186 823 783 276 939 236 3,243 142  186 277 823 783 911 106 131 26 3,243 142 3,385 
of which:
developed
 111 222 613 576 298 92 74 23 2,009 33 2,042 
undeveloped 75 55 210 207 613 14 57 3 1,234 109 1,343 
Purchase of Minerals in Place       2         2   2 
Revisions of Previous Estimates 57 40 129 78 (36) (35) 36 1 270   270 
Improved Recovery   8 10 15         33   33 
Extensions and Discoveries 10 74 38 5   44 12 8 191 1 192 
Production (20) (48) (105) (113) (26) (21) (26) (3) (362) (6) (368)
Sales of Minerals in Place                   (51) (51)
Reserves at December 31, 2009 233 351 895 770 849 94 153 32 3,377 86 3,463 
of which:
developed
 141 218 659 544 291 45 80 23 2,001 34 2,035 
undeveloped 92 133 236 226 558 49 73 9 1,376 52 1,428 
  
 
 





Proved developed oil reserves

Italy

North Africa

West Africa

North Sea

Caspian
Area
(1)

Rest of World

Total consolidated subsidiariesTotal joint ventures and associates (2)
(mmBBL)







Reserves at December 31, 2005 149 697 568 353 266 298 2,331 19
Reserves at December 31, 2006 136 713 546 329 262 140 2,126 18
Reserves at December 31, 2007 133 649 511 299 219 142 1,953 26
Reserves at December 31, 2008 111 613 576 222 321 166 2,009 33








ii
(a)iIncludes the redetermination of Eni’s share in the Val d’Agri concession in Italy.
(b)iIncludes 170 mmBBL related to unilateral termination of OSA for Dación field by PDVSA.
(1)iEni’s proved reserves of the Kashagan field are determined based on Eni's share of 16.81% as of December 31, 2008 and 18.52% in previous years.
(2)iReserves of joint ventures and associates as at December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2008 include 60% of the three Russian companies formerly part of Yukos purchased in 2007, for which Gazprom has a call option of 51%.

F-105


Natural gas

Proved natural gas reserves

Italy (a)

North Africa

West Africa

North Sea

Caspian
Area
(1)

Rest of World

Total consolidated subsidiariesTotal joint ventures and associates (2)
(BCF)







Reserves at December 31, 2005 3,676  6,117  1,965  1,864  1,774  2,105  17,501  90 
Purchase of Minerals in Place          4        4    
Revisions of Previous Estimates 36  154  31  53  183  47  504  (7)
Extensions and Discoveries 19  146  34  1     132  332  8 
Production (340) (471) (103) (218) (83) (222) (1,437) (15)
Sales of Minerals in Place          (7)       (7)   
Reserves at December 31, 2006 3,391  5,946  1,927  1,697  1,874  2,062  16,897  68 
Purchase of Minerals in Place       5        395  400  2,963 
Revisions of Previous Estimates (53) 250  74  67  (222) 6  122  5 
Improved Recovery          3        3    
Extensions and Discoveries 4  89  213  7  205  89  607    
Production (285) (534) (97) (216) (87) (261) (1,480) (14)
Reserves at December 31, 2007 3,057  5,751  2,122  1,558  1,770  2,291  16,549  3,022 
Purchase of Minerals in Place       6  8     114  128    
Revisions of Previous Estimates 56  1,163  45  (51) 773  55  2,041  6 
Improved Recovery       4           4    
Extensions and Discoveries 5  38  2  25     42  112    
Production (274) (641) (95) (204) (90) (300) (1,604) (13)
Sales of Minerals in Place             (16)    (16)   
Reserves at December 31, 2008 2,844  6,311  2,084  1,336  2,437  2,202  17,214  3,015 








Proved developed natural gas reserves

Italy (a)

North Africa

West Africa

North Sea

Caspian
Area
(1)

Rest of World

Total consolidated subsidiariesTotal joint ventures and associates (2)
(BCF)







Reserves at December 31, 2005 2,704 3,060 1,289 1,484 1,618 1,004 11,159 70
Reserves at December 31, 2006 2,449 3,042 1,447 1,395 1,511 1,105 10,949 48
Reserves at December 31, 2007 2,304 3,065 1,469 1,293 1,580 1,256 10,967 428
Reserves at December 31, 2008 2,031 3,537 1,443 1,065 2,006 1,056 11,138 420
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
(1)Eni's proved reserves of the Kashagan field are determined based on Eni share of 16.81% as at December 2008 and 2009 and 18.52% as at December 2007.
(2)The amounts of joint ventures and affiliates as at December 31, 2009 includes 29.4% of the three Russian companies former Yukos as a result of the Gazprom call option on the 51% of the shares (2007 and 2008 are reported at 60%).

F-119


Natural gas

(BCF)

Italy (a)

Rest of Europe

North Africa

West Africa

Kazakhstan (1)

Rest of Asia

Americas

Australia and Oceania

Total consolidated subsidiariesTotal joint ventures and affiliates (2)Total consolidated subsidiaries, joint ventures and affiliates











Reserves at December 31, 2006 3,391  1,836  5,946  1,927  1,874  991  299  633  16,897  68  16,965 
of which:
developed
 2,449  1,480  3,042  1,447  1,511  614  159  247  10,949  48  10,997 
undeveloped 942  356  2,904  480  363  377  140  386  5,948  20  5,968 
Purchase of Minerals in Place          5        395     400  2,963  3,363 
Revisions of Previous Estimates (53) 66  250  74  (222) 23  4  (20) 122  5  127 
Improved Recovery    3                    3     3 
Extensions and Discoveries 4  6  89  213  205  4  86     607     607 
Production (285) (236) (534) (97) (87) (138) (88) (15) (1,480) (14) (1,494)
Reserves at December 31, 2007 3,057  1,675  5,751  2,122  1,770  880  696  598  16,549  3,022  19,571 
of which:
developed
 2,304  1,364  3,065  1,469  1,580  530  442  213  10,967  428  11,395 
undeveloped 753  311  2,686  653  190  350  254  385  5,582  2,594  8,176 
Purchase of Minerals in Place    8     6     114        128     128 
Revisions of Previous Estimates 56  (58) 1,163  45  772  52  (13) 24  2,041  6  2,047 
Improved Recovery          4              4     4 
Extensions and Discoveries 5  25  38  2     11  31     112     112 
Production (274) (229) (641) (95) (89) (146) (114) (16) (1,604) (13) (1,617)
Sales of Minerals in Place             (16)          (16)    (16)
Reserves at December 31, 2008 2,844  1,421  6,311  2,084  2,437  911  600  606  17,214  3,015  20,229 
of which:
developed
 2,031  1,122  3,537  1,443  2,005  439  340  221  11,138  420  11,558 
undeveloped 813  299  2,774  641  432  472  260  385  6,076  2,595  8,671 
Purchase of Minerals in Place          1        136     137     137 
Revisions of Previous Estimates 97  149  (309) 142  (204) 52  43  (17) (47) 18  (29)
Improved Recovery    25                    25     25 
Extensions and Discoveries 1  26  479        2  7  4  519  80  599 
Production (238) (239) (587) (100) (94) (151) (155) (18) (1,582) (14) (1,596)
Sales of Minerals in Place    (2)             (2)    (4) (1,511) (1,515)
Reserves at December 31, 2009 2,704  1,380  5,894  2,127  2,139  814  629  575  16,262  1,588  17,850 
of which:
developed
 2,001  1,231  3,486  1,463  1,859  539  506  565  11,650  234  11,884 
undeveloped 703  149  2,408  664  280  275  123  10  4,612  1,354  5,966 











(1)Eni's proved reserves of the Kashagan field are determined based on Eni shareof 16.81% as at December 2008 and 2009 and 18.52% as at December 2007.
(2)The amounts of joint ventures and affiliates as at December 31, 2009 includes 29.4% of the three Russian companies former Yukos as a result of the Gazprom call option on the 51% of the shares (2007 and 2008 are reported at 60%).
(a) Including approximately, 760, 754, 749, 746 and 746769 BCF of natural gas held in storage at December 31, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008, respectively.
(1)Eni’s proved reserves of the Kashagan field are determined based on Eni's share of 16.81% as of December 31, 2008 and 18.52% in previous years.
(2)Reserves of joint ventures and associates as at December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2008 include 60% of the three Russian companies formerly part of Yukos purchased in 2007, for which Gazprom has a call option of 51%.2009, respectively.

Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows

Estimated future cash inflows represent the revenues that would be received from production and are determined by applying year-end prices of oil and gas for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2008 and the average prices during the year ended December 31, 2009 to the estimated future production of proved reserves. Future price changes are considered only to the extent provided by contractual arrangements. Estimated future development and production costs are determined by estimating the expenditures to be incurred in developing and producing the proved reserves at the end of the year. Neither the effects of price and cost escalations nor expected future changes in technology and operating practices have been considered.

The standardized measure is calculated as the excess of future cash inflows from proved reserves less future costs of producing and developing the reserves, future income taxes and a yearly 10% discount factor.

Future cash flows as of December 31, 2006, 2007 and 2008 include amounts that Eni’s Gas & Power segment and other gas companies pay for storage services, required to support market demand flexibility needs.F-120


Future production costs include the estimated expenditures related to the production of proved reserves plus any production taxes without consideration of future inflation. Future development costs include the estimated costs of drilling development wells and installation of production facilities, plus the net costs associated with dismantlement and abandonment of wells and facilities, under the assumption that year-end costs continue without considering future inflation. Future income taxes were calculated in accordance with the tax laws of the countries in which Eni operates.

The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows, related to the preceding proved oil and gas reserves, is calculated in accordance with the requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 69.FASB Extractive Activities - Oil & Gas (Topic 932). The standardized measure does not purport to reflect realizable values or fair market value of Eni’s proved reserves. An estimate of fair value would also take into account, among other things, hydrocarbon resources other than proved

F-106


reserves, anticipated changes in future prices and costs and a discount factor representative of the risks inherent in the oil and gas exploration and production activity.

The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows by geographical area consistsconsist of the following:

(euro million) 

Italy

 

North AfricaRest of Europe

 

WestNorth Africa

 

North SeaWest Africa

 

Caspian
Area
Kazakhstan (1)

 

Rest of WorldAsia

Americas

Australia and Oceania

 Total consolidated subsidiaries Total joint ventures and associates affiliates (2)Total consolidated subsidiaries, joint ventures and affiliates











At December 31, 2007                                 
Future cash inflows 47,243  30,390  73,456  48,283  42,710  4,855  11,180  3,544  261,661  7,135  268,796 
Future production costs (5,926) (6,759) (11,754) (9,875) (4,997) (476) (1,758) (459) (42,004) (1,249) (43,253)
Future development and abandonment costs (7,218) (2,653) (4,643) (3,013) (3,374) (306) (1,533) (428) (23,168) (1,721) (24,889)
Future net inflow before income tax 34,099  20,978  57,059  35,395  34,339  4,073  7,889  2,657  196,489  4,165  200,654 
Future income tax (10,778) (14,388) (29,083) (23,083) (9,977) (1,109) (3,272) (1,003) (92,693) (2,009) (94,702)
Future net cash flows 23,321  6,590  27,976  12,312  24,362  2,964  4,617  1,654  103,796  2,156  105,952 
10% discount factor (13,262) (1,757) (11,143) (3,953) (17,480) (718) (1,568) (913) (50,794) (1,265) (52,059)
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows 10,059  4,833  16,833  8,359  6,882  2,246  3,049  741  53,002  891  53,893 
At December 31, 2008                                 
Future cash inflows 46,458  16,963  62,785  22,344  21,648  5,072  5,257  2,937  183,464  4,782  188,246 
Future production costs (5,019) (3,467) (10,673) (6,715) (6,273) (707) (1,657) (405) (34,916) (1,104) (36,020)
Future development and abandonment costs (6,805) (2,317) (6,153) (3,868) (4,842) (738) (1,022) (258) (26,003) (1,845) (27,848)
Future net inflow before income tax 34,634  11,179  45,959  11,761  10,533  3,627  2,578  2,274  122,545  1,833  124,378 
Future income tax (11,329) (7,697) (27,800) (5,599) (2,745) (768) (232) (861) (57,031) (1,032) (58,063)
Future net cash flows 23,305  3,482  18,159  6,162  7,788  2,859  2,346  1,413  65,514  801  66,315 
10% discount factor (13,884) (1,042) (8,639) (2,155) (6,230) (672) (672) (768) (34,062) (763) (34,825)
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows 9,421  2,440  9,520  4,007  1,558  2,187  1,674  645  31,452  38  31,490 
At December 31, 2009                                 
Future cash inflows 26,243  22,057  59,413  33,676  30,273  5,680  7,088  2,973  187,403  3,718  191,121 
Future production costs (4,732) (6,215) (7,771) (9,737) (6,545) (1,427) (1,797) (529) (38,753) (1,251) (40,004)
Future development and abandonment costs (5,143) (5,375) (8,618) (5,134) (4,345) (1,409) (1,897) (214) (32,135) (1,168) (33,303)
Future net inflow before income tax 16,368  10,467  43,024  18,805  19,383  2,844  3,394  2,230  116,515  1,299  117,814 
Future income tax (5,263) (6,621) (24,230) (9,894) (4,827) (636) (694) (563) (52,728) (432) (53,160)
Future net cash flows 11,105  3,846  18,794  8,911  14,556  2,208  2,700  1,667  63,787  867  64,654 
10% discount factor (5,868) (1,455) (9,160) (3,102) (10,249) (520) (1,162) (771) (32,287) (610) (32,897)
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows (a) 5,237  2,391  9,634  5,809  4,307  1,688  1,538  896  31,500  257  31,757 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
At December 31, 2006                        
Future cash inflows 43,495  64,381  34,935  24,821  33,825  14,766  216,223  1,038 
Future production costs (6,086) (9,707) (8,028) (6,426) (4,162) (1,753) (36,162) (224)
Future development and abandonment costs (6,739) (5,383) (2,865) (2,265) (3,103) (1,473) (21,828) (79)
Future cash inflow before income tax 30,670  49,291  24,042  16,130  26,560  11,540  158,233  735 
Future income tax (10,838) (24,639) (14,141) (10,901) (7,649) (3,824) (71,992) (227)
Future net cash flows 19,832  24,652  9,901  5,229  18,911  7,716  86,241  508 
10% discount factor (11,493) (10,631) (2,994) (1,392) (13,878) (2,626) (43,014) (154)
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows 8,339  14,021  6,907  3,837  5,033  5,090  43,227  354 
At December 31, 2007                        
Future cash inflows 47,243  73,456  48,283  29,610  42,710  20,359  261,661  7,135 
Future production costs (5,926) (11,754) (9,875) (6,670) (4,997) (2,782) (42,004) (1,249)
Future development and abandonment costs (7,218) (4,643) (3,013) (2,461) (3,374) (2,459) (23,168) (1,721)
Future cash inflow before income tax 34,099  57,059  35,395  20,479  34,339  15,118  196,489  4,165 
Future income tax (10,778) (29,083) (23,083) (14,375) (9,977) (5,397) (92,693) (2,009)
Future net cash flows 23,321  27,976  12,312  6,104  24,362  9,721  103,796  2,156 
10% discount factor (13,262) (11,143) (3,953) (1,600) (17,480) (3,356) (50,794) (1,265)
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows 10,059  16,833  8,359  4,504  6,882  6,365  53,002  891 
At December 31, 2008                        
Future cash inflows 46,458  62,785  22,344  16,056  22,199  13,622  183,464  4,782 
Future production costs (5,019) (10,673) (6,715) (3,414) (6,380) (2,715) (34,916) (1,104)
Future development and abandonment costs (6,805) (6,153) (3,868) (2,166) (5,114) (1,897) (26,003) (1,845)
Future cash inflow before income tax 34,634  45,959  11,761  10,476  10,705  9,010  122,545  1,833 
Future income tax (11,329) (27,800) (5,599) (7,621) (2,781) (1,901) (57,031) (1,032)
Future net cash flows 23,305  18,159  6,162  2,855  7,924  7,109  65,514  801 
10% discount factor (13,884) (8,639) (2,155) (869) (6,272) (2,243) (34,062) (763)
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows 9,421  9,520  4,007  1,986  1,652  4,866  31,452  38 





 
 
 
   
(1) Eni's standardized measure of discounted future of net cash flows of the Kashagan field isare determined based on Eni’sEni shareof 16.81% as ofat December 31, 2008 and 2009 and 18.52% in previous years.as at December 2007.
(2) The amounts of joint ventures and associatesaffiliates as at December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2008 include 60%2009 includes 29.4% of the three Russian companies formerly partformer Yukos as a result of Yukos purchased in 2007, for whichthe Gazprom has a call option on the 51% of 51%the shares (2007 and 2008 are reported at 60%).
(a)Amounts of 2009 do not include standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows related to the Italian gas storage activities, following the restructuring of Eni's regulated gas businesses in Italy now reported in the Gas & Power segment.

F-107F-121


Changes in standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows

Changes in standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows for the years 2006,ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2008.2009, are as follows:

(euro million) 

2006

 

2007

 

2008

  
 
 
          
Beginning of year 55,722  43,581  53,893 
Beginning of year related to joint venture and associates (371) (354) (891)
Beginning of year consolidated 55,351  43,227  53,002 
Increase (decrease):         
- sales, net of production costs (21,739) (20,979) (26,202)
- net changes in sales and transfer prices, net of production costs 4,097  34,999  (39,699)
- extensions, discoveries and improved recovery, net of future production and development costs 3,629  3,982  1,110 
- changes in estimated future development and abandonment costs (6,964) (4,000) (6,222)
- development costs incurred during the period that reduced future development costs 3,558  4,682  6,584 
- revisions of quantity estimates 383  (2,995) 5,835 
- accretion of discount 9,489  7,968  10,538 
- net change in income taxes 3,060  (17,916) 21,359 
- purchase of reserves in-place 10  3,521  476 
- sale of reserves in-place (1,252)    25 
- changes in production rates (timing) and other (6,395) 513  4,646 
Net increase (decrease) (12,124) 9,775  (21,550)
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows consolidates 43,227  53,002  31,452 
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows joint ventures and associates 354  891  38 
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows 43,581  53,893  31,490 
(euro million)

Total consolidated subsidiaries

Total joint ventures and affiliates

Total consolidated subsidiaries, joint ventures and affiliates




Value at December 31, 2006 43,227  354  43,581 
Increase (Decrease):         
- sales, net of production costs (20,979) (143) (21,122)
- net changes in sales and transfer prices, net of production costs 34,999  153  35,152 
- extensions, discoveries and improved recovery, net of future production and development costs 3,982  46  4,028 
- changes in estimated future development and abandonment costs (4,000) (73) (4,073)
- development costs incurred during the period that reduced future development costs 4,682  56  4,738 
- revisions of quantity estimates (2,995) 527  (2,468)
- accretion of discount 7,968  50  8,018 
- net change in income taxes (17,916) (1,027) (18,943)
- purchase of reserves in-place 3,521  929  4,450 
- changes in production rates (timing) and other 513  19  532 
Net increase (decrease) 9,775  537  10,312 
Value at December 31, 2007 53,002  891  53,893 
Increase (Decrease):         
- sales, net of production costs (26,202) (178) (26,380)
- net changes in sales and transfer prices, net of production costs (39,699) (1,254) (40,953)
- extensions, discoveries and improved recovery, net of future production and development costs 1,110  10  1,120 
- changes in estimated future development and abandonment costs (6,222) (129) (6,351)
- development costs incurred during the period that reduced future development costs 6,584  145  6,729 
- revisions of quantity estimates 5,835  (61) 5,774 
- accretion of discount 10,538  201  10,739 
- net change in income taxes 21,359  657  22,016 
- purchase of reserves in-place 476     476 
- sale of reserves in-place 25     25 
- changes in production rates (timing) and other 4,646  (244) 4,402 
Net increase (decrease) (21,550) (853) (22,403)
Value at December 31, 2008 31,452  38  31,490 
Increase (Decrease):         
- sales, net of production costs (17,752) (154) (17,906)
- net changes in sales and transfer prices, net of production costs 4,515  286  4,801 
- extensions, discoveries and improved recovery, net of future production and development costs 3,587  22  3,609 
- changes in estimated future development and abandonment costs (9,915) (157) (10,072)
- development costs incurred during the period that reduced future development costs 7,401  208  7,609 
- revisions of quantity estimates 4,686  (113) 4,573 
- accretion of discount 6,112  29  6,141 
- net change in income taxes 674  (67) 607 
- purchase of reserves in-place 161     161 
- sale of reserves in-place (7) 81  74 
- changes in production rates (timing) and other 586  84  670 
Net increase (decrease) 48  219  267 
Value at December 31, 2009 31,500  257  31,757 
  
 
 

F-109F-122


SIGNATURES

The registrant certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and has duly caused this annual report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: April 26, 2010

Eni SpA
/s/ANTONIO CRISTODORO

Antonio Crstodoro
Title: Deputy Corporate Secretary

F-123


EXHIBIT 1

Eni SpA By-laws

Part I - Establishment - Name - Registered Office and Duration of the Company

ARTICLE 1

1.1 "Eni SpA" resulting from the transformation of Ente Nazionale Idrocarburi, a public law agency, established by Law 136 of February 10, 1953, is regulated by these by-laws.

ARTICLE 2

2.1 The registered head office of the company is located in Rome, Italy and the company’s two branches in San Donato Milanese (MI).
2.2 Main representative offices, affiliates and branches may be established and/or wound up in Italy or abroad in compliance with the law.

ARTICLE 3

3.1 The company is expected to exist until December 31, 2100. Its duration may be extended one or more times by resolution of the shareholders’ meeting.

Part II - Company Objects

ARTICLE 4

4.1 The company objects are the direct and/or indirect management, by way of shareholdings in companies, agencies or businesses, of activities in the field of hydrocarbons and natural vapours, such as exploration and development of hydrocarbon fields, construction and operation of pipelines for transporting the same, processing, transformation, storage, utilisation and trade of hydrocarbons and natural vapours, all in respect of concessions provided by law.
The company also has the object of direct and/or indirect management, by way of shareholdings in companies, agencies or businesses, of activities in the fields of chemicals, nuclear fuels, geothermy and renewable energy sources, in the sector of engineering and construction of industrial plants, in the mining sector, in the metallurgy sector, in the textile machinery sector, in the water sector, including derivation, drinking water, purification, distribution and reuse of waters; in the sector of environmental protection and treatment and disposal of waste, as well as in every other business activity that is instrumental, supplemental or complementary with the aforementioned activities.
The company also has the object of managing the technical and financial co-ordination of subsidiaries and affiliated companies as well as providing financial assistance on their behalf.
The company may perform any operations necessary or useful for the achievement of the company objects; by way of example, it may initiate operations involving real estate, moveable goods, trade and commerce, industry, finance and banking asset and liability operations, as well as any action that is in any way connected with the company objects with the exception of public fund raising and the performance of investment services as regulated by Legislative Decree No. 58 of February 24, 1998.
The company may take shareholdings and interests in other companies or businesses with objects similar, comparable or complementary to its own or those of companies in which it has holdings, either in Italy or abroad, and it may provide real and or personal bonds for its own and others’ obligations, especially guarantees.

Part III - Capital - Shareholdings - Bonds

ARTICLE 5

5.1 The company capital is euro 4,005,358,876.00 (four billion five million three hundred and fifty-eight thousand eight hundred and seventy-six) represented by 4,005,358,876 (four billion five million three hundred and fifty-eight thousand eight hundred and seventy-six) shares of ordinary stock with a nominal value of euro 1 (one) each.
5.2 Shares may not be split up and each share is entitled to one vote.
5.3 The fact of being a Shareholder in itself constitutes approval of these by-laws.

ARTICLE 6

6.1 Pursuant to Article 3 of Law Decree 332 of May 31, 1994, converted with amendments into Law 474 of July 30, 1994, no one, in any capacity, may own company shares that entail a holding of more than 3 per cent of voting share capital.
Such maximum shareholding limit is calculated by taking into account the aggregate shareholding held by the controlling entity, either a physical or legal person or company; its directly or indirectly controlled entities, as well as entities controlled by the same controlling entity; affiliated entities as well as people related to the second degree by blood or marriage, also in the case of a legally separated spouse.

E-1


  Control exists, with reference also to entities other than companies, in the cases envisaged by Article 2359, paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Civil Code.
Affiliation exists in the case set forth in Article 2359, paragraph 3, of the Civil Code as well as between entities that directly or indirectly, by way of subsidiaries, other than those managing investment funds, are bound, even with third parties, in agreements regarding the exercise of voting rights or the transfer of shares or portions of third companies or, in any event, in agreements or pacts as per Article 122 of Legislative Decree No. 58 of February 24, 1998 regarding third party companies if said agreements or pacts concern at least 10 per cent of the voting capital, if they are listed companies, or 20 per cent if they are unlisted companies.
The aforementioned shareholding limit (3 per cent) is calculated by taking into account shares held by any fiduciary nominee or intermediary.
Any voting rights and any other non-financial rights attributable to voting capital held or controlled in excess of the maximum limit indicated in the foregoing cannot be exercised and the voting rights of each entity to whom such limit on shareholding applies are reduced in proportion, unless otherwise jointly provided in advance by the parties involved. In the event that shares exceeding this limit are voted, any Shareholders’ resolution adopted pursuant to such a vote may be challenged pursuant to Article 2377 of the Civil Code, if the required majority had not been reached without the votes exceeding the aforementioned maximum limit.
Shares not entitled to vote are included in the determination of the quorum at shareholders’ meetings.
6.2 Pursuant to Article 2, paragraph 1 of Law Decree 332 of May 31, 1994, converted with amendments into Law 474 of July 30, 1994, as modified by Article 4, paragraph 227, of Law December 24, 2003, No. 350, the Minister of Economy and Finance retains the following special powers to be exercised in agreement with the Minister of the Economic Development and according to the criteria contained in the Decree issued by the President of the Council of Ministers on June 10, 2004:
  a) opposition with respect to the acquisition of material shareholdings by entities affected by the shareholding limit as set forth in Article 3 of Law Decree 332 of May 31, 1994, converted with amendments into Law 474 of July 30, 1994, by which – as per Decree issued by the Minister of Treasury on October 16, 1995 – are meant those representing at least 3% of share capital with the right to vote at the ordinary shareholders’ meeting. The opposition is expressed within ten days of the date of the notice to be filed by the Board of Directors at the time request is made for registration in the Shareholders’ Register if the Minister considers that such an acquisition may prejudice the vital interests of the Italian State. Until the ten-day term is not lapsed, the voting rights and the non-asset linked rights connected with the shares representing a material shareholding may not be exercised. If the opposition power is exercised, through a duly motivated act in connection with the prejudice that may be caused by the operation to the vital interests of the Italian State, the transferee may not exercise the voting rights and the other non-asset linked rights connected with the shares representing a material shareholding and must sell said shares within one year. Failing to comply, the law court, upon request of the Minister of Economy and Finance, will order the sale of the shares representing a material shareholding according to the procedures set forth in Article 2359-ter of the Civil Code. The act through which the opposition power is exercised may be sued by the transferee before the Regional Administrative Court of Latium within sixty days as of its issue;
  b) opposition with respect to the subscription of Shareholders’ pacts or agreements as per Article 122 of Legislative Decree No. 58 of February 24, 1998, involving – as per Decree issued by the Minister of Treasury on October 16, 1995 – at least 3% of the share capital with the right to vote at ordinary shareholders’ meetings. In order to allow the exercise of the above mentioned opposition power, Consob notifies the Minister of Economy and Finance of the relevant pacts or agreements communicated to it pursuant to the aforementioned Article 122 of Legislative Decree No. 58 of February 24, 1998. The opposition power may be exercised within ten days as of the date of the notice by Consob. Until the ten-day term is not lapsed, the voting right and the other non-asset linked rights connected with the shares held by the shareholders who have subscribed the above mentioned pacts or agreements may not be exercised. If the opposition power is exercised through the issue of an act that shall be duly motivated in consideration of the prejudice that may be caused by said pacts or agreements to the vital interests of the Italian State, the shareholders pacts or agreements shall be null and void. If in the shareholders’ meetings the shareholders who have signed shareholders’ pacts or agreements behave as if those pacts or agreements disciplined by Article 122 of Legislative Decree No. 58 of February 24, 1998 were still in effect, the resolutions approved with their vote, if determining for the approval, may be sued. The act through which the opposition power is exercised may be sued by the shareholders who joined the above mentioned pacts or agreements before the Regional Administrative Court of Latium within sixty days as of its issue;
  c) veto power with respect to resolutions to dissolve the company, to transfer the business, to merge, to demerge, to transfer the company’s registered office abroad, to change the company objects and to amend the by-laws cancelling or modifying the powers indicated in this Article. The act through which the veto power is exercised shall be duly motivated in consideration of the prejudice the related resolution may cause to the vital interests of the Italian State and may be sued by the dissenting Shareholders before the Regional Administrative Court of Latium within sixty days as of its issue;

E-2


  d) appointment of one Board member with no voting rights. Should such appointed Director lapse, the Minister of Economy and Finance in agreement with the Minister of the Economic Development will appoint his substitute.

ARTICLE 7

7.1 When shares are fully paid, and if the law so allows, they may be issued to the bearer. Bearer shares may be converted into registered shares and vice versa. Conversion operations are performed at the Shareholder’s expense.

ARTICLE 8

8.1 In the event, and for whatever reason, a share belongs to more than one person, the rights relating to said share may not be exercised by other than one person or by a proxy for all co-owners.

ARTICLE 9

9.1 The shareholders’ meeting may resolve to increase the company capital and establish terms, conditions and means thereof.
9.2 The shareholders’ meeting may resolve to increase the company capital by issuing shares, including shares of different classes, to be assigned for no consideration pursuant to Article 2349 of the Civil Code.

ARTICLE 10

10.1 Payments on shares are requested by the Board of Directors in one or more times.
10.2 Shareholders who are late in payment are charged an interest calculated at the official discount rate established by the Bank of Italy besides the provisions envisaged in Article 2344 of the Civil Code.

ARTICLE 11

11.1 The company may issue bonds, including convertibles and warrant bonds in compliance with the law.

Part IV - Shareholders’ meeting

ARTICLE 12

12.1 Ordinary and extraordinary shareholders’ meetings are usually held at the company registered office unless otherwise resolved by the Board of Directors, provided however they are held in Italy.
12.2 Ordinary shareholders’ meetings must be called at least once a year to approve the financial statements within 120 days of the end of the business year.

ARTICLE 13

13.1 Shareholders’ meetings are convened through a notice to be published on the Italian Official Gazette or the following newspapers: "Il Sole 24 Ore", "Corriere della Sera" and "Financial Times", according to the current legislation and in compliance with the rules in force regulating the exercise of the vote by mail.
The Shareholders that, severally or jointly, represent at least one fortieth of Eni share capital, may ask, within five days as of the date of publication of the shareholders’ meeting notice, to add other items in the agenda. The request shall contain the matters to be proposed to the shareholders’ meeting. Said faculty may not be exercised on the matters upon which, pursuant to the applicable legislation, the shareholders’ meeting resolves on the basis of a proposal of the Board of Directors or on the basis of a project or report of the Board. The integrations accepted by the Board shall be published at least ten days before the shareholders’ meeting date, through a notice to be published as indicated above.
13.2 Admission to the shareholders’ meeting is subject to the delivery, also for registered shares, of the communication issued by financial intermediaries at least two labour days before the date of the shareholders’ meeting on first call.

ARTICLE 14

14.1 Each Shareholder entitled to attend the meeting may also be represented in compliance with the law by a person appointed by written proxy. Incorporated entities and companies may attend the meeting by way of a person appointed by written proxy. In order to simplify collection of proxies issued by Shareholders who are employees of the company or its subsidiaries and members of Shareholders associations incorporated under and managed pursuant to current legislation regulating proxies collection, notice boards for communications and rooms to allow proxies collection are made available to said associations according to terms and conditions agreed from time to time by the company with the associations representatives.
14.2 The Chairman of the meeting has to assure the regularity of written proxies and, in general, the right to attend the meeting.
14.3 The right to vote may also be exercised by mail according to the laws and regulations in force concerning this matter.
14.4 Eni SpA shareholders’ meetings are disciplined by Eni SpA’s shareholders’ meeting Regulation approved by the ordinary shareholders’ meeting.

E-3


ARTICLE 15

15.1 The meeting is chaired by the Chairman of the Board of Directors, or in the event of absence or impediment, by the Chief Executive Officer; in absence of both, by another person, duly delegated by the Board of Directors, failing which the meeting may elect its own Chairman.
15.2 The Chairman of the meeting is assisted by a Secretary, who need not be a Shareholder, to be designated by the Shareholders present, and may appoint one or more scrutineers.

ARTICLE 16

16.1 The ordinary shareholders’ meeting decides on all the matters for which it is legally entitled and authorises the transfer of the business.
16.2 Resolutions either at ordinary or extraordinary meetings, either on first, second or third call, must be taken with the majority required by the law in each case.
16.3 Resolutions of the meeting taken in compliance with the law and these by-laws are binding for all Shareholders even if absent or dissenting.
16.4 The minutes of ordinary meetings must be signed by the Chairman and the Secretary.
16.5 The minutes of extraordinary meetings must be drawn up by a notary public.

Part V - The Board of Directors

ARTICLE 17

17.1 The company is managed by a Board of Directors consisting of no fewer than three and no more than nine members. The shareholders’ meeting determines the number within these limits. The Minister of Economy and Finance in agreement with the Minister of the Economic Development may appoint another member, with no voting rights, pursuant to Article 6, second paragraph, letter d), of the by-laws.
17.2 The Board of Directors is appointed for a period of up to three financial years; this term lapses on the date of the shareholders’ meeting convened to approve the financial statements of the last year of their office. They may be reappointed.
17.3 

The Board of Directors, except for the member appointed pursuant to Article 6.2, letter d) of these by-laws, is appointed by the shareholders’ meeting on the basis of lists presented by Shareholders and by the Board of Directors; in such lists the candidates must be listed in numerical order. Should the retiring Board of Directors present its own candidate list, it must be deposited at the company’s registered office and published in at least three Italian newspapers of general circulation, two of them business dailies, at least twenty days before the date set for the first call of the shareholders’ meeting. Candidate lists presented by Shareholders must be deposited and published as indicated in the foregoing at least ten days before the date set for the first call of the shareholders’ meeting.
Each Shareholder may present or take part in the presenting of only one candidate list and vote only one candidate list. Those who are controlling or controlled entities or are under common control, as defined by Article 93 of Legislative Decree No. 58 issued on February 24, 1998, by the same entity of the shareholder presenting a list shall not present nor take part in the presentation of another candidate list, nor vote them, also through intermediaries or fiduciaries. Each candidate may appear in one list only or he will be ineligible. Only those Shareholders who, alone or together with other Shareholders, represent at least 1 per cent of voting share capital at the ordinary shareholders’ meeting may present candidate lists. In order to demonstrate the title on the number of shares necessary to present candidate lists, the Shareholders must present and/or deliver with the company’s registered office a copy of the communication issued by the authorised financial intermediaries that are depositaries of their shares at least five days prior to the date set for the first call of the shareholders’ meeting.
At least one Board member, if the Board members are no more than five, or at least three Board members if the Board members are more than five, shall have the independence requirements set for the Board of Statutory Auditors members of listed companies. The independent candidates shall be expressly indicated in each list.
All candidates shall also have the honorability qualifications set forth by the applicable legislation.
Together with the deposit of each list, in order to assure its validity, the following documents shall be deposited: (i) the curriculum of each candidate; (ii) statements of each candidate to accept his nomination and attest, in his own responsibility, that causes for his ineligibility and incompatibility are non existing and that he possesses the aforementioned honorability and, if any, independence requirements.
The Directors appointed shall communicate to the Company if they have lost the above mentioned independence and honorability requirements and if situations of ineligibility or incompatibility have arisen.
The Board of Directors evaluates periodically the independence and the honorability of its members and if situations of ineligibility or incompatibility have arisen.
If the honorability or independence requirements declared and set forth by the legislation in force are not present or elapse for a Board member or if situations of ineligibility or incompatibility have arisen, the Board of Directors removes said Board member and resolves upon his substitution or invites him to remove the situation of incompatibility within the term set by the Board itself; if this last condition is not met, the Director will be removed from office.

E-4


  Board members will be elected in the following manner:
  a) seven tenths of the members to be elected will be drawn out from the candidate list that receives the majority of votes expressed by the Shareholders in the numerical order in which they appear on the list, rounded off in the event of a fractional number to the next lower number;
  b) the remaining Board members will be drawn out from the other candidate lists; said lists shall not be linked in any way, neither indirectly, to the shareholders who have presented or voted the list that has obtained the highest number of votes; to this purpose the votes obtained by each candidate list will be divided by one or two depending on the number of the members to be elected. The quotients thus obtained will be assigned progressively to candidates of each said list in the order given in the lists themselves. Quotients thus assigned to candidates of said lists will be set in one decreasing numerical order. Those who obtain the highest quotients will be elected.
In the event that more than one candidate obtains the same quotient, the candidate elected will be the one of the list that has not hitherto had a Board member elected or that has elected the least number of Board members.
In the event that none of the lists has yet elected a Board member or that all of them have elected the same number of Board members, the candidate from all such lists who has obtained the largest number of votes will be elected. In the event of equal list votes and equal quotient, a new vote will be taken by the entire shareholders’ meeting and the candidate elected will be the one who obtains a simple majority of the votes;
  c) if through the procedure described above the minimum number of independent Directors set by these by-laws is not elected, the quotient is calculated according to letter b) above in order to be assigned to the candidates present in each list; the independent candidates not yet drawn from the lists pursuant to letters a) and b) above, who have got the highest quotients will be elected in order to meet the provision of the by-laws on the number of the independent Directors. The Directors so appointed will replace the non independent Directors to whom the lowest quotients have been assigned. If the number of independent candidates is lower than the minimum limit set by the by-laws, the shareholders’ meeting will make a resolution with the majorities prescribed by the law to substitute the not independent candidates who have got the lowest quotients;
  d) to appoint Board members for any reason not covered by the terms of the aforementioned procedure, the shareholders’ meeting will make a resolution with the majorities prescribed by the law in order, however, to assure that the Board composition complies with the current legislation and the by-laws.
  The vote by list procedure shall apply only in case of appointment of the entire Board of Directors.
17.4 The shareholders’ meeting may, even during the Board’s term of office, change the number of members of the Board of Directors, always within the limits set forth in paragraph 17.1 above, and make the relating appointments. Board members so elected will expire at the same time as the rest of the Board.
17.5 If during the term of office one or more members leave the Board, action will be taken in compliance with Article 2386 of the Civil Code with exception of the Board member appointed pursuant to Article 6.2 letter d) of these by-laws. If a majority of members leaves the Board, the whole Board will be considered lapsed and the Board must promptly call a shareholders’ meeting to appoint a new Board.
17.6 The Board may establish Board Committees that shall have advisory and consulting tasks on specific items.

ARTICLE 18

18.1 If the shareholders’ meeting has not appointed a Chairman, the Board will elect one of its members. The Director appointed pursuant to Article 6, second paragraph, letter d) of the by-laws cannot be appointed as Chairman.
18.2 The Board, at the Chairman’s proposal, appoints a Secretary, who need not belong to the company.

ARTICLE 19

19.1 The Board meets in the place indicated in the notice whenever the Chairman or, in case of absence or impediment, the Chief Executive Officer deems necessary, or when written application has been made by the majority of the members. The Board of Directors may be convened also pursuant to Article 28.4 of the by-laws. The Board of Directors’ meetings may be held by video or teleconference if each of the participants to the meetings may be identified and if each is allowed to follow the discussion and take part to it in real time. If said conditions are met, the meeting is considered duly held in the place where the Chairman and the Secretary are present.
19.2 Usually notice is given at least five days in advance. In cases of urgency notice may be sent earlier. The Board of Directors decides on how to convene its meetings.
19.3 The Board of Directors must likewise be convened when so requested by at least two Board members or by one member if the Board consists of three members to decide on a specific matter considered of particular importance, pertaining to management, matter to be indicated in the request.

ARTICLE 20

20.1 The Chairman of the Board or, in his absence, the oldest Board member in attendance chairs the meeting.

E-5


ARTICLE 21

21.1 A majority of members of the Board having a voting right must be present for a Board meeting to be valid.
21.2 Resolutions are taken with the majority of votes of the Board members having a voting right present; should votes be equal, the person who chairs the meeting has a casting vote.

ARTICLE 22

22.1 Resolutions of the Board are entered in the minutes, which are recorded in a book kept for that purpose pursuant to the law, and said minutes are signed by the Chairman of the meeting and by the Secretary.
22.2 Copies of the minutes are bona fide if they are signed by the Chairman or the person acting for him and countersigned by the Secretary.

ARTICLE 23

23.1 The Board of Directors is invested with the fullest powers for ordinary and extraordinary management of the company and, in particular, the Board has the power to perform all acts it deems advisable for the implementation and achievement of the company objects, except for the acts that the law or these by-laws reserve for the shareholders’ meeting.
23.2 The Board of Directors is allowed to resolve on the following matters:
- the merger and the demerger of at least 90% directly owned subsidiaries;
- the establishment and winding up of branches;
- the amendment to the by-laws in order to comply with the current legislation.
23.3 The Board of Directors and the Chief Executive Officer report timely, at least every three months and however in the Board of Directors meetings, to the Board of Statutory Auditors on the activities and on the most relevant operations regarding the operational, economic and financial management of the company and its subsidiaries; in particular the Board of Directors and the Chief Executive Officer report to the Board of Statutory Auditors on operations entailing an interest on their behalf or on behalf of third parties.

ARTICLE 24

24.1 

The Board of Directors delegates its powers to one of its members with the exception of the Director appointed pursuant to Article 6, second paragraph, letter d) of the by-laws, in compliance with the limits set forth in Article 2381 of the Civil Code. In addition the Board of Directors may delegate powers to the Chairman for researching and promoting integrated projects and strategic international agreements. The Board of Directors may at any time withdraw the delegations of powers hereon; if the Board of Directors withdraws powers delegated to the Chief Executive Officer, a new Chief Executive Officer is simultaneously appointed.
The Board of Directors, upon proposal of the Chairman and in agreement with the Chief Executive Officer, may confer powers for single acts or categories of acts to other members of the Board of Directors with the exception of the Director appointed pursuant to Article 6, second paragraph, letter d) of the by-laws. The Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer, in compliance with the limits of their delegations, may delegate and empower company employees or persons not belonging to the company to represent the company for single acts or specific categories of acts.
Further, upon proposal of the Chief Executive Officer and in agreement with the Chairman, the Board of Directors may also appoint one or more General Managers and determines the powers to be conferred to them. In order to make the appointment effective, the Board of Directors shall verify if the General Manager to be appointed has the honorability requirements set by the current legislation. The Board of Directors shall periodically verify said honorability requirements. The General Managers without said requirement shall be removed.
Upon proposal of the Chief Executive Officer presented and in agreement with the Chairman, the Board of Directors appoints the Manager responsible for the preparation of financial reporting documents. The appointment is subject to the favourable opinion of the Board of Statutory Auditors.

  The Manager responsible for the preparation of financial reporting documents is chosen among people who, for at least three years, have exercised:
  a) administration or control activities or directive tasks in companies listed on regulated stock exchanges in Italy or other European Union countries or other countries member of OECD with a share capital not less than two million euro or
  b) audit activities in the companies mentioned in letter a) above, or
  c) professional activities or teaching activities in universities in the financial or accounting sectors, or
  d) managerial functions in public or private bodies in the financial, accounting, or control sectors.
  The Board of Directors assures that the Manager responsible for the preparation of financial reporting documents is given adequate powers and means to execute his or her tasks and to respect the administrative and accounting procedures.

ARTICLE 25

25.1 Legal representation towards any judicial or administrative authority and towards third parties, together with the company signature, are vested either onto the Chairman or the Chief Executive Officer.

E-6


ARTICLE 26

26.1 The Chairman and the members of the Board are remunerated in an amount established by the ordinary shareholders’ meeting. Said resolution, once taken, will remain valid for subsequent business years until the shareholders’ meeting decides otherwise.

ARTICLE 27

27.1 The Chairman:
  a) represents the company according to the provisions of Article 25.1;
  b) chairs the shareholders’ meeting pursuant to Article 15.1;
  c) convenes and chairs meetings of the Board of Directors pursuant to Articles 19.1 and 20.1;
  d) ascertains whether Board resolutions have been implemented;
  e) exercises the powers delegated to him by the Board of Directors pursuant to Article 24.1 of these by-laws.

Part VI - Board of Statutory Auditors

ARTICLE 28

28.1 The Board of Statutory Auditors consists of five effective members and two alternate members. The Auditors shall have the professional and honour requirements set forth by the Ministerial Decree No. 162, dated March 30, 2000 issued by the Ministry of Justice.
Pursuant to the aforementioned Ministerial Decree, the matters strictly connected to those of interest of the Company are: companies law, business economics and corporate finance.
Pursuant to said Ministerial Decree, the sectors strictly connected with those of interest of the Company are the engineering and geological sectors.
The Statutory Auditors may be appointed members of administration and control bodies in other companies within the limits set by Consob regulation.
Until those provisions do not come in force, those who are already appointed effective auditor or supervisory board member or audit committee member in at least five companies with securities listed on regulated securities markets other than Eni SpA subsidiaries may not be appointed Statutory Auditor; if elected, they will lapse.
28.2 The Board of Statutory Auditors is appointed by the shareholders’ meeting on the basis of lists presented by the Shareholders; in such lists candidates are listed in numerical order.
For the presentation, deposit and publication of candidate lists the procedures set forth in Article 17.3 shall apply and according to the rules set forth by Consob.
Lists shall be divided into two sections: the first one for the candidates to be appointed effective Auditors and the second one for the candidates to be appointed alternate Auditors. At least the first candidate of each section shall be chartered accountant and have exercised audit activities for not less than three years.
Three effective Auditors and one alternate Auditor will be drawn from the list that obtains the majority of votes. The other two effective Auditors and the other alternate Auditor will be appointed pursuant to Article 17.3, letter b) of the by-laws. The procedure described in this last Article shall be applied to each section of the lists involved separately.
The shareholders’ meeting appoints the Chairman of the Board of Statutory Auditors among the effective Auditors appointed according to Article 17.3 letter b) of these by-laws.
To appoint effective or alternate Auditors for any reason not elected according to the terms of the aforementioned procedure, the shareholders’ meeting will resolve with the majorities prescribed by the law.
The vote by list procedure shall apply only in case of appointment of the entire Board of Statutory Auditors.
Should an effective Auditor drawn out from the candidate list that receives the majority of votes expressed by the Shareholders be replaced, he will be succeeded by the alternate Auditor drawn out from the same candidate list; should an effective Auditor drawn out from the other candidate list be replaced, he will be substituted by the Alternate Auditor drawn by those other lists.
28.3 Retiring Auditors may be reelected.
28.4 Subject to a previous communication to the Chairman of the Board of Directors, the Board of Statutory Auditors is empowered to convene the shareholders’ meeting and the Board of Directors. At least two effective Auditors are empowered to convene the shareholders’ meetings and at least one effective Auditor is empowered to convene the Board meetings.
The Board of Statutory Auditors’ meetings may be held by video or teleconference if each of the participants to the meetings may be identified and if each is allowed to follow the discussion and take part to it in real time. If said conditions are met, the Meeting is considered duly held in the place where the Chairman and the Secretary are present.

Part VII - Financial Statements and Profits

ARTICLE 29

29.1 The business year ends on December 31 every year.

E-7


29.2 At the end of each business year, the Board of Directors sees to the preparation of the company financial statements in conformity with the law.
29.3 The Board of Directors may, during the course of the business year, pay interim dividends to the Shareholders.

ARTICLE 30

30.1 Dividends not collected within five years of the day on which they are payable will be prescribed in favour of the company and allocated to reserves.

Part VIII - Winding Up and Liquidation of the Company

ARTICLE 31

31.1 In the event the company is wound up, the shareholders’ meeting will decide the manner of liquidation, appoint one or more liquidators and determine their powers and remuneration.

Part IX - General Provisions

ARTICLE 32

32.1 For matters not expressly regulated by these by-laws, the norms of the Civil Code and specific laws concerning these matters will apply.
32.2 Pursuant to Article 3, paragraph 2, of Law Decree 332 of May 31, 1994, converted with amendments into Law 474 of July 30, 1994, Article 6.1, paragraph sixth, of these bylaws does not apply to the share owned by the Ministry of Economy and Finance, by public bodies or by entities controlled thereby.

ARTICLE 33

33.1 The company retains all assets and liabilities held before its transformation by the public law agency Ente Nazionale Idrocarburi.

 

 

 

 

E-8


EXHIBIT 8

List of Eni’s subsidiaries for year 20082009

Subsidiary 

Country of Incorporation

 

Eni’s share of net profit (%)

     
EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION    
     
Eni Angola SpA Italy 100.00
Eni East Africa SpA Italy 100.00
Eni Medio Oriente SpAItaly100.00
Eni Mediterranea Idrocarburi SpA Italy 100.00
Eni Timor Leste SpA Italy 100.00
Ieoc SpA Italy 100.00
Società Adriatica Idrocarburi SpAItaly100.00
Società Ionica Gas SpAItaly100.00
Società Oleodotti Meridionali - SOM SpA Italy 70.00
Società Padana Energia SpAItaly100.00
Società Petrolifera Italiana SpA Italy 99.96
Stoccaggi Gas Italia SpA - Stogit SpAItaly100.00
Tecnomare - Società per lo Sviluppo delle Tecnologie Marine SpA Italy 100.00
Agip Caspian Sea BV Netherlands 100.00
Agip Energy &and Natural Resources (Nigeria) Ltd Nigeria 100.00
Agip Karachaganak BV Netherlands 100.00
Agip Oil Ecuador BV Netherlands 100.00
Astrakhan Gas and Oil CoRussia3.00
Burren Energy (Bermuda) Ltd Bermuda 100.00
Burren Energy (Buguruslan) LtdCyprus100.00
Burren Energy (Congo)Congo Ltd British Virgin Islands100.00
Burren Energy Drilling Services Ltd (in liquidation)UK 100.00
Burren Energy (Egypt) Ltd UK 100.00
Burren Energy India Ltd UK 100.00
Burren Energy Ltd Cyprus 100.00
Burren Energy New Ventures LtdUK100.00
Burren Energy (Oman) LtdUK100.00
Burren Energy Plc UK 100.00
Burren Energy (Services) LtdUK100.00
Burren Energy (Yemen) Ltd UK 100.00
Burren Resources Petroleum Ltd Bermuda 100.00
Burren Shakti Ltd Bermuda 100.00
Eni AEP Ltd UK 100.00
Eni Algeria Exploration BV Netherlands 100.00
Eni Algeria Ltd Sàrl Luxembourg 100.00
Eni Algeria Production BV Netherlands 100.00
Eni Ambalat Ltd UK 100.00
Eni America Ltd USA 100.00
Eni Angola Exploration BV Netherlands 100.00
Eni Angola Production BV Netherlands 100.00
Eni Australia BV Netherlands 100.00
Eni Australia Ltd UK 100.00
Eni BB Petroleum Inc USA 100.00
Eni Bukat Ltd UK 100.00
Eni Bulungan BV Netherlands 100.00
Eni Canada Holding Ltd Canada 100.00
Eni CBM LtdUK100.00
Eni China BV Netherlands 100.00
Eni Congo Holding BV Netherlands 100.00
Eni Congo SA Congo 100.00
Eni Croatia BV Netherlands 100.00
Eni Dación BV Netherlands 100.00
Eni Denmark BV Netherlands 100.00
Eni Elgin/Franklin Ltd UK 100.00
Eni Energy Ltd (in liquidation) UK 100.00
Eni Energy Russia BV Netherlands 100.00
Eni Gabon SAGabon99.96
Eni Ganal Ltd UK 100.00
Eni Gas & Power LNG Australia BV Netherlands 100.00

E-9


Eni Grand Maghreb BVGhana Exploration and Production Ltd NetherlandsGhana 100.00

E-9


Eni Hewett Ltd UK 100.00
Eni India Ltd UK 100.00
Eni Indonesia Ltd UK 100.00
Eni International NA NV Sàrl Luxembourg 100.00
Eni Investments Plc UK 100.00
Eni Iran BVNetherlands100.00
Eni Iraq BV Netherlands 100.00
Eni Ireland BV Netherlands 100.00
Eni JPDA 03-13 Ltd UK 100.00
Eni JPDA 06-105 Pty Ltd Australia 100.00
Eni Krueng Mane Ltd UK 100.00
Eni Lasmo Plc UK 100.00
Eni LNS Ltd UK 100.00
Eni Mali BV Netherlands 100.00
Eni Marketing Inc USA 100.00
Eni MHH Ltd (in liquidation) UK 100.00
Eni Middle East BV Netherlands 100.00
Eni Middle East Ltd UK 100.00
Eni MOG Ltd (in liquidation) UK 100.00
Eni Morocco BV Netherlands 100.00
Eni Muara Bakau BV Netherlands 100.00
Eni Norge AS Norway 100.00
Eni North Africa BV Netherlands 100.00
Eni Oil Algeria Ltd UK 100.00
Eni Oil do Brasil SA Brazil 100.00
Eni Oil & Gas Inc USA 100.00
Eni Oil Holdings BV Netherlands 100.00
Eni Pakistan Ltd UK 100.00
Eni Pakistan (M) Ltd Sàrl Luxembourg 100.00
Eni Papalang Ltd UK 100.00
Eni Petroleum Co Inc USA 100.00
Eni Petroleum US Llc USA 100.00
Eni PetroRussia BV Netherlands 100.00
Eni Popodi Ltd UK 100.00
Eni Rapak Ltd UK 100.00
Eni Resources Ltd UK 100.00
Eni Securities LtdUK100.00
Eni TNS Ltd UK 100.00
Eni TrasportationTransportation Ltd UK 100.00
Eni Trinidad and Tobago Ltd Trinidad & Tobago 100.00
Eni TTO Ltd UK 100.00
Eni Tunisia BEK BV Netherlands 100.00
Eni Tunisia BV Netherlands 100.00
Eni UFL Ltd UK 100.00
Eni UHL Ltd UK 100.00
Eni UKCS Ltd UK 100.00
Eni UK Holding Plc UK 100.00
Eni UK Ltd UK 100.00
Eni ULT Ltd UK 100.00
Eni ULX Ltd UK 100.00
Eni USA Gas Marketing Llc USA 100.00
Eni USA Inc USA 100.00
Eni US Operating Co Inc USA 100.00
Eni Venezuela BV Netherlands 100.00
Eni West Timor Ltd UK 100.00
Eni Yemen Ltd (ex Burren Energy (Yemen) Ltd)UK100.00
First Calgary Petroleums LP USA 100.00
First Calgary Petroleums Ltd Canada 100.00
First Calgary Petroleums Partner Co ULC Canada 100.00
First Calgary Petroleums UK Ltd UK 100.00
Hindustan Oil Exploration Co Ltd India 47.18
Ieoc Exploration BV Netherlands 100.00
Ieoc Production BV Netherlands 100.00
Lasmo Sanga Sanga Ltd Bermuda 100.00

E-10


Nigerian Agip Exploration Ltd Nigeria 100.00
Nigerian Agip Oil Co Ltd Nigeria 100.00
OOO ‘Eni Energhia’ Russia 100.00
     
     
GAS & POWER    
     
Acqua Campania SpA Italy 47.6231.98
Compagnia Napoletana di Illuminazione e Scaldamento col Gas SpA Italy 99.6955.40
Eni Gas & Power Belgium SpA Italy 100.00
Eni Gas Transport Deutschland SpA Italy 100.00
Eni Hellas SpA Italy 100.00
EniPower Mantova SpA Italy 86.50
EniPower SpA Italy 100.00
EniPower TrasmissioneGNL Italia SpAItaly55.57
LNG Shipping SpA Italy 100.00
GNL Italia SpAItaly55.59
LNG ShippingSeacom SpA Italy 100.00
Snam Rete Gas SpA Italy 55.5955.57
Società EniPower Ferrara Srl Italy 51.00
Società Italiana per il Gas pA Italy 100.0055.57
Stoccaggi Gas Italia SpA - Stogit SpAItaly55.57
Toscana Energia Clienti SpA Italy 79.22100.00
Travagliato Energia SrlItaly100.00
Adriaplin Podjetje za distribucijo zemeljskega plina doo Ljubljana Slovenia 51.00
Distribuidora de Gas Cuyana SA Argentina 45.60
Distrigas NV Belgium 57.24100.00
Distri RE SA Luxembourg 57.24100.00
Eni Gas & Power Belgium SA Belgium 100.00
Eni Gas & Power GmbH Germany 100.00
Eni Gas Transport GmbH (ex Eni Gas & Power GmbH) Germany 100.00
Eni Gas Transport International SA Switzerland 100.00
Eni G&P France BV Netherlands 100.00
Eni G&P Trading BV Netherlands 100.00
Finpipe GIE Belgium 36.2463.33
Gas Brasiliano Distribuidora SA Brazil 100.00
GreenStream BV Netherlands 75.00
Inversora de Gas Cuyana SA Argentina 76.00
Société de Financement et de Participation SA Belgium 57.13100.00
Société de Service du Gazoduc Transtunisien SA - Sergaz SA Tunisia 66.67
Société pour la Construction du Gazoduc Transtunisien SA - Scogat SA Tunisia 100.00
Tigáz-Dso Földgázelosztó Korlátolt Felelossegu Tarsasagkft Hungary 50.08
Tigáz Tiszántúli Gázszolgáltató Zártkörûen Mûködõ Részvénytársaság Hungary 50.08
Transfin SA Belgium 57.13100.00
Trans Tunisian Pipeline Co Ltd Channel Islands 100.00
     
     
REFINING & MARKETING    
     
AgipFuel Nord SpAItaly100.00
Agip Rete SpAItaly100.00
Costiero Gas Livorno SpA Italy 65.00
Ecofuel SpAItaly100.00
Eni Fuel Nord SpA (ex AgipFuel Nord SpA)Italy100.00
Eni Rete oil&nonoil SpA (ex Agip Rete SpA) Italy 100.00
Eni Trading & Shipping SpA Italy 100.00
Petrolig Srl Italy 70.00
Petroven Srl Italy 68.00
Raffineria di Gela SpA Italy 100.00
Agip Austria GmbH Austria 100.00
Agip Benelux BVNetherlands100.00
Agip Ceská Republika Sro Czech Republic 100.00
Agip Deutschland GmbH Germany 100.00
Agip Ecuador SAEcuador100.00
Agip France SàrlFrance100.00
Agip Hungaria ZrtHungary100.00
Agip Iberia SLU (ex Eni España Comercializadora de Gas SA)Spain100.00
Agip Lubricantes SA Argentina100.00
Agip Oil Ceská Republika SroCzech Republic100.00

E-11


Agip Oil Slovensko Spol SroSlovakia100.00
Agip Olaj Magyarország Kereskedelmi Korlátolt Felelõsségû TársaságHungary 100.00
Agip Romania Srl Romania 100.00
Agip Schmiertechnik GmbH Germany 100.00
Agip Slovenija doo Slovenia 100.00
Agip Slovensko Spol SroSlovakia100.00
Agip Suisse SASwitzerland100.00
American Agip Co Inc USA 100.00

E-11


Eni Benelux BV (ex Agip Benelux BV)Netherlands100.00
Eni Ecuador SA (ex Agip Ecuador SA)Ecuador100.00
Eni France Sàrl (ex Agip France Sàrl)France100.00
Eni Hungaria Zrt (ex Agip Hungaria Zrt)Hungary100.00
Eni Iberia SLU (ex Agip Iberia SLU)Spain100.00
Eni Oil Ceská Republika Sro (ex Agip Oil Ceská Republika Sro)Czech Republic100.00
Eni Oil Slovensko Spol Sro (ex Agip Oil Slovensko Spol Sro)Slovakia100.00
Eni Slovensko Spol Sro (ex Agip Slovensko Spol Sro)Slovakia100.00
Eni Suisse SA (ex Agip Suisse SA)Switzerland100.00
Eni Trading & Shipping BV (ex Eni Trading BV) Netherlands 100.00
Eni Trading & Shipping Inc USA 100.00
Esain SA Ecuador 100.00
     
     
PETROCHEMICALS    
     
Polimeri Europa SpA Italy 100.00
Dunastyr Polisztirolgyártó Zártkoruen Mukodo Részvénytársaság Hungary 100.00
Polimeri Europa Benelux SA Belgium 100.00
Polimeri Europa France SAS France 100.00
Polimeri Europa GmbH Germany 100.00
Polimeri Europa Ibérica SA Spain 100.00
Polimeri Europa UK Ltd UK 100.00
     
     
ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION    
     
Intermare Sarda SpA Italy 43.5543.48
Saipem Energy ItaliaServices SpA Italy 43.55
Saipem Energy Services SpA (ex Energy Maintenance Services SpA)Italy43.5543.48
Saipem SpA Italy 43.5543.48
Servizi Energia Italia SpA (ex Saipem Energy Italia SpA)Italy43.48
Snamprogetti Chiyoda SAS di Saipem SpA Italy 43.51
Snamprogetti Sud SpAItaly43.5543.44
Andromeda Consultoria Tecnica e Representações Ltda Brazil 43.5543.48
BOSCONGO SA Congo 43.5543.48
BOS Investment Ltd UK 43.5543.48
BOS - UIE Ltd UK 43.55
Delong Hersent - Estudos, Construções Maritimas e Participações, Unipessoal LdaPortugal43.5543.48
Entreprise Nouvelle Marcellin SA France 43.5543.48
ER SAI Caspian Contractor Llc Kazakhstan 21.7821.74
ERS - Equipment Rental & Services BV Netherlands 43.5543.48
European Marine Contractors Ltd (in liquidation) UK 43.5543.48
European Marine Investments Ltd (in liquidation) UK 43.5543.48
European Maritime Commerce BV Netherlands 43.55
Frigstad Discoverer Invest LtdBritish Virgin Islands43.55
Firgstad Discoverer Invest (S) Pte LtdSingapore43.5543.48
Global Petroprojects Services AG Switzerland 43.5543.48
Katran-K Llc Russia 43.55
Moss Arctic Offshore ASNorway43.5543.48
Moss Maritime AS Norway 43.5543.48
Moss Maritime Inc USA 43.5543.48
Moss Offshore AS Norway 43.5543.48
North Caspian ServicesService Co Kazakhstan 43.5543.48
Petrex SA Peru 43.5543.48
Petromar Lda Angola 30.4930.44
PT Saipem Indonesia Indonesia 43.55
Saibos Construções Maritimas LtdaPortugal43.5543.48
Saigut SA De Cv Mexico 43.5543.48
Saimexicana SA De Cv Mexico 43.5543.48
Saipem America Inc USA 43.5543.48
Saipem Asia Sdn Bhd Malaysia 43.5543.48
Saipem (Beijing) Technical Services Co Ltd China 43.5543.48
Saipem Contracting Algerie SpA Algeria 43.5543.48
Saipem Contracting (Nigeria) Ltd Nigeria 42.6642.59
Saipem Discoverer Invest Sàrl (ex Frigstad Discoverer Invest Ltd)Luxembourg43.48
Saipem do Brasil Serviçõs de Petroleo Ltda Brazil 43.5543.48

E-12


Saipem Drilling Co Private Ltd (ex Saipem Aban Drilling Co Private Ltd)India43.48
Saipem Holding France SAS France 43.5543.48
Saipem India Projects Ltd (ex Saipem India Project Services Ltd) India 43.5543.48
Saipem International BV Netherlands 43.5543.48
Saipem Logistics Services LtdNigeria43.55

E-12


Saipem Luxembourg SA Luxembourg 43.5543.48
Saipem (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd Malaysia 18.0217.99
Saipem Maritime Asset Management Luxembourg Sàrl Luxembourg 43.5543.48
Saipem Mediteran Usluge doo Croatia 43.5543.48
Saipem Misr for Petroleum Services SAE Egypt 43.5543.48
Saipem (Nigeria) Ltd Nigeria 38.9438.88
Saipem Perfurações e Construções PetroliferasPetrolíferas Unipessoal Lda Portugal 43.5543.48
Saipem (Portugal) Comércio Marítimo,timo. Sociedade Unipessoal Lda Portugal 43.5543.48
Saipem (Portugal) - Gestão de Participações SGPS Sociedade Unipessoal SA Portugal 43.5543.48
Saipem SA France 43.5543.48
Saipem Services México SA De Cv Mexico 43.5543.48
Saipem Services SA Belgium 43.5543.48
Saipem Singapore Pte Ltd Singapore 43.5543.48
Saipem UK Ltd UK 43.5543.48
Saipem Ukraine Llc Ukraine 43.5543.48
SAS Port de Tanger France 43.5543.48
Saudi Arabian Saipem Ltd United Arab EmiratesSaudi Arabia 26.13
Services et Equipements Gaziers et Petroliers SAFrance43.4826.09
Sigurd Rück AG Switzerland 43.5543.48
Snamprogetti Canada Inc Canada 43.5543.48
Snamprogetti Engineering BV Netherlands 43.5543.48
Snamprogetti France Sàrl France 43.5543.48
Snamprogetti Ltd UK 43.5543.48
Snamprogetti Lummus Gas Ltd Malta 43.12
Snamprogetti Management Services SASwitzerland43.5543.05
Snamprogetti Netherlands BV Netherlands 43.5543.48
Snamprogetti Romania Srl Romania 43.5543.48
Snamprogetti Saudi Arabia Co Ltd Llc (ex Snamprogetti Saudi Arabia Ltd) United Arab EmiratesSaudi Arabia 43.55
Snamprogetti USA IncUSA43.5543.48
Société de Construction d’Oleoducsd'Oleoducs Snc France 43.48
Sofresid Engineering SA France 43.5543.48
Sofresid SA France 43.5543.48
Sonsub AS Norway 43.5543.48
Sonsub International Pty Ltd Australia 43.5543.48
Sonsub Ltd (in liquidation) UK 43.5543.48
Star Gulf FZ Co United Arab Emirates 43.5543.48
Varisal - Serviços Dede Consultadoria e Marketing Unipessoal Lda
(ex Varisal - Serviços de Consultadoria e Marketing Lda) Portugal 43.5543.48
     
     
OTHER ACTIVITIES    
     
Ing. Luigi Conti Vecchi SpA Italy 100.00
Syndial SpA - Attività Diversificate Italy 100.00
     
     
CORPORATE AND FINANCIAL COMPANIES    
     
Agenzia Giornalistica Italia SpA Italy 100.00
Eni Administration & Financial Service SpA
(ex Società Finanziamenti Idrocarburi - Sofid - SpA)Italy99.62
Eni Corporate University SpA Italy 100.00
EniServizi SpA Italy 100.00
Serfactoring SpA Italy 48.81
Servizi Aerei SpA Italy 100.00
Società Finanziamenti Idrocarburi - Sofid - SpAItaly99.61
Banque Eni SA Belgium 100.00
Eni Coordination Center SA Belgium 100.00
Eni Insurance LtdFinance USA Inc IrelandUSA 100.00
Eni International BankInsurance Ltd BahamasIreland 100.00
Eni International BV Netherlands 100.00
Eni International Resources Ltd UK 100.00

 

 

E-13


EXHIBIT 11

Code of Ethics

Approved by the Board of Directors of Eni SpA on March 14, 2008
The English text is a translation of the Italian official "Code of Ethics"
For any conflict or discrepancies between the two texts the Italian text shall prevail

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Foreword

I. GENERAL PRINCIPLES: SUSTAINABILITY AND CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY

II. BEHAVIOUR RULES AND RELATIONS WITH STAKEHOLDERS
1. Ethics, transparency, fairness, professionalism
2. Relations with shareholders and with the Market
2.1. Value for shareholders, efficiency, transparency
2.2. Self-Regulatory Code
2.3. Company information
2.4. Privileged information
2.5. Media
3. Relations with institutions, associations, local communities
3.1. Authorities and Public Institutions
3.2. Political organizations and trade unions
3.3. Development of local Communities
3.4. Promotion of "non profit" activities
4. Relations with customers and suppliers
4.1. Customers and consumers
4.2. Suppliers and external collaborators
5. Eni’s management, employees, collaborators
5.1. Development and protection of Human Resources
5.2. Knowledge Management
5.3. Corporate security
5.4. Harassment or mobbing in the workplace
5.5. Abuse of alcohol or drugs and no smoking

III. TOOLS FOR IMPLEMENTING THE CODE OF ETHICS
1. System of internal control
1.1. Conflicts of interest
1.2. Transparency of accounting records
2. Health, safety, environment and public safety protection
3. Research, innovation and intellectual property protection
4. Confidentiality
4.1. Protection of business secret
4.2. Protection of privacy
4.3. Membership in associations, participation in initiatives, events or external meetings

IV. CODE OF ETHICS SCOPE OF APPLICATION AND REFERENCE STRUCTURES
1. Obligation to know the Code and to report any possible violation thereof
2. Reference structures and supervision
2.1. Guarantor of the Code of Ethics
2.2. Code Promotion Team
3. Code review
4. Contractual value of the Code

E-14


FOREWORD

Eni1 is an internationally oriented industrial group which, because of its size and the importance of its activities, plays a significant role in the marketplace and in the economic development and welfare of the individuals who work or collaborate with Eni and of the communities where it is present.

The complexity of the situations in which Eni operates, the challenges of sustainable development and the need to take into consideration the interests of all people having a legitimate interest in the corporate business ("Stakeholders"), strengthen the importance to clearly define the values that Eni accepts, acknowledges and shares as well as the responsibilities it assumes, contributing to a better future for everybody.

For this reason the new Eni’s Code of Ethics ("Code" or "Code of Ethics") has been devised.

Compliance with the Code by Eni’s directors, statutory auditors, management and employees as well as by all those who operate in Italy and abroad for achieving Eni’s objectives ("Eni’s People"), each within their own functions and responsibilities, is of paramount importance – also pursuant to legal and contractual provisions governing the relationship with Eni – for Eni’s efficiency, reliability and reputation, which are all crucial factors for its success and for improving the social situation in which Eni operates.

Eni undertakes to promote knowledge of the Code among Eni’s People and the other Stakeholders, and to accept their constructive contribution to the Code’s principles and contents. Eni undertakes to take into consideration any suggestions and remarks of Stakeholders, with the objective of confirming or integrating the Code.

Eni carefully checks for compliance with the Code by providing suitable information, prevention and control tools and ensuring transparency in all transactions and behaviours by taking corrective measures if and as required.

The Watch Structure of each Eni company performs the functions of guarantor of the Code of Ethics ("Guarantor").

The Code is brought to the attention of every person or body having business relations with Eni.

 

 

 


(1) "Eni" means Eni SpA and its direct and indirect subsidiaries, in Italy and abroad.

E-15


I. GENERAL PRINCIPLES: SUSTAINABILITY AND CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY

Compliance with the law, regulations, statutory provisions, self-regulatory codes, ethical integrity and fairness, is a constant commitment and duty of all Eni’s People, and characterizes the conduct of Eni’s entire organization.
Eni’s business and corporate activities has to be carried out in a transparent, honest and fair way, in good faith, and in full compliance with competition protection rules.
Eni undertakes to maintain and strengthen a governance system in line with international best practice standards, able to deal with the complex situations in which Eni operates, and with the challenges to face for sustainable development.
Systematic methods for involving Stakeholders are adopted, fostering dialogue on sustainability and corporate responsibility.
In conducting both its activities as an international company and those with its partners, Eni stands up for the protection and promotion of human rights – inalienable and fundamental prerogatives of human beings and basis for the establishment of societies founded on principles of equality, solidarity, repudiation of war, and for the protection of civil and political rights, of social, economic and cultural rights and the so-called third generation rights (selfdetermination right, right to peace, right to development and protection of the environment).
Any form of discrimination, corruption, forced or child labor is rejected. Particular attention is paid to the acknowledgement and safeguarding of the dignity, freedom and equality of human beings, to protection of labor and of the freedom of trade union association, of health, safety, the environment and biodiversity, as well as the set of values and principles concerning transparency, energy efficiency and sustainable development, in accordance with International Institutions and Conventions.
In this respect Eni operates within the reference framework of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Fundamental Conventions of the ILO – International Labor Organization – and the OECD Guidelines on Multinational Enterprises.
All Eni’s People, without any distinction or exception whatsoever, respect the principles and contents of the Code in their actions and behaviours while performing their functions and according to their responsibilities, because compliance with the Code is fundamental for the quality of their working and professional performance. Relationships among Eni’s People, at all levels, must be characterized by honesty, fairness, cooperation, loyalty and mutual respect.
The belief that one is acting in favor or to the advantage of Eni can never, in any way, justify – not even in part – any behaviours that conflict with the principles and contents of the Code.

 

II. BEHAVIOUR RULES AND RELATIONS WITH STAKEHOLDERS

1. ETHICS, TRANSPARENCY, FAIRNESS, PROFESSIONALISM

In conducting its business, Eni is inspired by and complies with the principles of loyalty, fairness, transparency, efficiency and an open market, regardless of the importance level of the transaction in question.
Any action, transaction and negotiation performed and, generally, the conduct of Eni’s People in the performance of their duties is inspired by the highest principles of fairness, completeness and transparency of information and legitimacy, both in form and substance, as well as clarity and truthfulness of all accounting documents, in compliance with the applicable laws in force and internal regulations.
All Eni’s activities have to be performed with the utmost care and professional skill, with the duty to provide skills and expertise adequate to the tasks assigned, and to act in a way capable to protect Eni’s image and reputation. Corporate objectives, as well as the proposal and implementation of projects, investments and actions, have to be aimed at improving the company’s assets, management, technological and information level in the long term, and at creating value and welfare for all Stakeholders.
Bribes, illegitimate favours, collusion, requests for personal benefits for oneself or others, either directly or through third parties, are prohibited without any exception.
It is prohibited to pay or offer, directly or indirectly, money and material benefits and other advantages of any kind to third parties, whether representatives of governments, public officers and public servants or private employees, in order to influence or remunerate the actions of their office.
Commercial courtesy, such as small gifts or forms of hospitality, is only allowed when its value is small and it does not compromise the integrity and reputation of either party, and cannot be construed by an impartial observer as aimed at obtaining undue advantages. In any case, these expenses must always be authorized by the designated managers as per existing internal rules, and be accompanied by appropriate documentation.
It is forbidden to accept money from individuals or companies that have or intend to have business relations with Eni. Anyone who receives proposals of gifts or special or hospitality treatment that cannot be considered as commercial courtesy of small value, or requests therefore by third parties, shall reject them and immediately inform their superior, or the body they belong to, as well as the Guarantor.
Eni shall properly inform all third parties about the commitments and obligations provided for in the Code, require third parties to respect the principles of the Code relevant to their activities and take proper internal actions and, if the matter is within its own competence, external actions in the event that any third party should fail to comply with the Code.

E-16


2. RELATIONS WITH SHAREHOLDERS AND WITH THE MARKET

2.1.Value2.1. Value for shareholders, efficiency, transparency
The internal structure of Eni and the relations with the parties directly and indirectly taking part in its activities are organized according to rules able to ensure management reliability and a fair balance between the management’s powers and the interests of shareholders and of the other Stakeholders in general as well as transparency and market traceability of management decisions and general corporate events which may considerably influence the market value of the financial instruments issued.
Within the framework of the initiatives aimed at maximizing the value for shareholders and at guaranteeing transparency of the management’s work, Eni defines, implements and progressively adjusts a coordinated and homogeneous set of behaviour rules concerning both its internal organizational structure and relations with shareholders and third parties, in compliance with the highest corporate governance standards at national and international level, based on the awareness that the company’s capacity to impose efficient and effective functioning rules upon itself is a fundamental tool for strengthening its reputation in terms of reliability and transparency as well as Stakeholders’ trust.
Eni deems it necessary that shareholders are enabled to participate in decisions which come within the limits of their competence and make informed choices. Therefore, Eni undertakes to ensure maximum transparency and timeliness of information communicated to shareholders and to the market – by means of the corporate internet site, too – in compliance with the laws and regulations applicable to listed companies. Moreover, Eni undertakes to keep in due consideration the legitimate remarks expressed by shareholders whenever they are entitled to do so.

2.2. Self-Regulatory Code
The main corporate governance rules of Eni are contained in the Self-Regulatory Code of Eni SpA, adopted in compliance with the Code promoted by Borsa Italiana SpA, which is referred to herein as far as applicable.

2.3. Company information
Eni ensures the correct management of company information, by means of suitable procedures for in-house management and communication to the outside.

2.4. Privileged information
All Eni’s People are required, while performing the tasks entrusted to them, to properly manage privileged information such as to know and comply with corporate procedures referring to market abuse. Insider trading and any behaviour that may promote insider trading are expressly forbidden. In any case, the purchase or sale of shares of Eni or of companies outside Eni shall always be based on absolute and transparent fairness.

2.5. Media
Eni undertakes to provide outside parties with true, prompt, transparent and accurate information.
Relations with the media are exclusively dealt with by the departments and managers specifically appointed to do so; information to be supplied to media representatives, as well as the undertaking to provide such information, have to be agreed upon beforehand by Eni’s People with the relevant Eni Corporate structure.


3. RELATIONS WITH INSTITUTIONS, ASSOCIATIONS, LOCAL COMMUNITIES

Eni encourages dialogue with Institutions and with organized associations of civil society in all the countries where it operates.

3.1. Authorities and Public Institutions
Eni, through its People, actively and fully cooperates with Authorities.
Eni’s People, as well as external collaborators whose actions may somehow be referred to Eni, must have behaviours towards the Public Administration characterized by fairness, transparency and traceability. These relations have to be exclusively dealt with by the departments and individuals specifically appointed to do so, in compliance with approved plans and corporate procedures.
The departments of the subsidiaries concerned shall coordinate with the relevant Eni Corporate structure for assessing the quality of the interventions to be carried out and for the sharing, implementing and monitoring of their actions.
It is forbidden to make, induce or encourage false statements to Authorities.

3.2. Political organizations and trade unions
Eni does not make any direct or indirect contributions in whatever form to political parties, movements, committees, political organizations and trade unions, nor to their representatives and candidates, except those specifically contemplated by applicable laws and regulations.

E-17


3.3. Development of local Communities
Eni is committed to actively contribute to promoting the quality of life, the socio-economic development of the communities where Eni operates and to the development of their human resources and capabilities, while conducting its business activities according to standards that are compatible with fair commercial practices.
Eni’s activities are carried out in the awareness of the social responsibility that Eni has towards all of its Stakeholders and in particular the local communities in which it operates, in the belief that the capacity for dialogue and interaction with civil society constitutes an important asset for the company. Eni respects the cultural, economic and social rights of the local communities in which it operates and undertakes to contribute, as far as possible, to their exercise, with particular reference to the right to adequate nutrition, drinking water, the highest achievable level of physical and mental health, decent dwellings, education, abstaining from actions that may hinder or prevent the exercise of such rights.
Eni promotes transparency of the information addressed to local communities, with particular reference to the topics that they are most interested in. Forms of continuous and informed consultancy are either promoted, through the relevant Eni structures, in order to take into due consideration the legitimate expectations of local communities in conceiving and conducting corporate activities and in order to promote a proper redistribution of the profits deriving from such activities.
Eni, therefore, undertakes to promote the knowledge of its corporate values and principles, at every level of its organization, also through adequate control procedures, and to protect the rights of local communities, with particular reference to their culture, institutions, ties and life styles.
Within the framework of their respective responsibilities, Eni’s People are required to participate in the definition of single initiatives in compliance with Eni’s policies and intervention programs, to implement them according to criteria of absolute transparency and support them as an integral part of Eni’s objectives.

3.4. Promotion of "non profit" activities
The philanthropic activity of Eni is in line with its vision and attention to sustainable development.
Therefore, Eni undertakes to foster and support, as well as to promote among its People, its "non profit" activities which demonstrate the company’s commitment to help meet the needs of those communities where it operates.


4. RELATIONS WITH CUSTOMERS AND SUPPLIERS

4.1 Customers and consumers
Eni pursues its business success on markets by offering quality products and services under competitive conditions while respecting the rules protecting fair competition.
Eni undertakes to respect the right of consumers not to receive products harmful to their health and physical integrity and to get complete information on the products offered to them.
Eni acknowledges that the esteem of those requesting products or services is of primary importance for success in business. Business policies are aimed at ensuring the quality of goods and services, safety and compliance with the precautionary principle. Therefore, Eni’s People shall:

 comply with in-house procedures concerning the management of relations with customers and consumers;
 supply, with efficiency and courtesy, within the limits set by the contractual conditions, high-quality products meeting the reasonable expectations and needs of customers and consumers;
 supply accurate and exhaustive information on products and services and be truthful in advertisements or other kind of communication, so that customers and consumers can make informed decisions.

4.2. Suppliers and external collaborators
Eni undertakes to look for suppliers and external collaborators with suitable professionalism and committed to sharing the principles and contents of the Code and promotes the establishment of long-lasting relations for the progressive improvement of performances while protecting and promoting the principles and contents of the Code.
In relationships regarding tenders, procurement and, generally, the supply of goods and/or services and of external collaborations (including consultants, agents, etc.), Eni’s People shall:

follow internal procedures concerning selection and relations with suppliers and external collaborators and abstain from excluding any supplier meeting requirements from bidding for Eni’s orders; adopt appropriate and objective selection methods, based on established, transparent criteria;
 secure the cooperation of suppliers and external collaborators in guaranteeing the continuous satisfaction of Eni’s customers and consumers, to an extent adequate to that legitimately expected by them, in terms of quality, costs and delivery times;
 use as much as possible, in compliance with the laws in force and the criteria for legality of transactions with related parties, products and services supplied by Eni companies at arm’s length and market conditions;
 state in contracts the Code acknowledgement and the obligation to comply with the principles contained therein;
 comply with, and demand compliance with, the conditions contained in contracts;
 maintain a frank and open dialogue with suppliers and external collaborators in line with good commercial practice; promptly inform superiors, and the Guarantor, about any possible violations of the Code;

E-18


inform the relevant Eni Corporate structure about any serious problems that may arise with a particular supplier or external collaborator, in order to evaluate possible consequences for Eni.

The remuneration to be paid shall be exclusively proportionate to the services to be rendered and described in the contract and payments shall not be allowed to any party different from the contract party nor in a third Country different from the one of the parties or where the contract has to be performed.


5. ENI’S MANAGEMENT, EMPLOYEES, COLLABORATORS

5.1. Development and protection of Human Resources
People are basic components in the company’s life. The dedication and professionalism of management and employees represent fundamental values and conditions for achieving Eni’s objectives.
Eni is committed to developing the abilities and skills of management and employees so that their energy and creativity can have full expression for the fulfilment of their potential in their working performance, such as to protect working conditions as regards both mental and physical health and dignity. Undue pressure or discomfort is not allowed, while appropriate working conditions promoting development of personality and professionalism are fostered.
Eni undertakes to offer, in full compliance with applicable legal and contractual provisions, equal opportunities to all its employees, making sure that each of them receives a fair statutory and wage treatment exclusively based on merit and expertise, without discrimination of any kind. Competent departments shall:

 adopt in any situation criteria of merit and ability (and anyhow strictly professional) in all decisions concerning human resources;
 select, hire, train, compensate and manage human resources without discrimination of any kind;
 create a working environment where personal characteristics or beliefs do not give rise to discrimination and which allows the serenity of all Eni’s People.

Eni wishes that Eni’s People, at every level, cooperate in maintaining a climate of common respect for a person’s dignity, honour and reputation. Eni shall do its best to prevent attitudes that can be considered as offensive, discriminatory or abusive. In this regard, any behaviours outside the working place which are particularly offensive to public sensitivity are also deemed relevant.
In any case, any behaviours constituting physical or moral violence are forbidden without any exception.

5.2. Knowledge Management
Eni promotes culture and the initiatives aimed at disseminating knowledge within its structures, and at pointing out the values, principles, behaviours and contributions in terms of innovation of professional families in connection with the development of business activities and to the company’s sustainable growth.
Eni undertakes to offer tools for interaction among the members of professional families, working groups and communities of practice, as well as for coordination and access to know-how, and shall promote initiatives for the growth, dissemination and systematization of knowledge relating to the core competences of its structures and aimed at defining a reference framework suitable for guaranteeing operating consistency.
All Eni’s People shall actively contribute to Knowledge Management as regards the activities that they are in charge of, in order to optimize the system for knowledge sharing and distribution among individuals.

5.3. Corporate security
Eni engages in the study, development and implementation of strategies, policies and operational plans aimed at preventing and overcoming any intentional or non-intentional behaviour which may cause direct or indirect damage to Eni’s People and/or to the tangible and intangible resources of the company. Preventive and defensive measures, aimed at minimizing the need for an active response – always in proportion to the attack – to threats to people and assets, are favored.
All Eni’s People shall actively contribute to maintaining an optimal corporate security standard, abstaining from unlawful or dangerous behaviours, and reporting any possible activities carried out by third parties to the detriment of Eni’s assets or human resources to superiors or to the body they belong to, as well as to the relevant Eni Corporate structure.
In any case requiring particular attention to personal safety, it is compulsory to strictly follow the indications in this regard supplied by Eni, abstaining from behaviours which may endanger one’s own safety or the safety of others, promptly reporting any danger for one’s own safety, or the safety of third parties, to one’s superior.

5.4. Harassment or mobbing in the workplace
Eni supports any initiatives aimed at implementing working methods for the achievement of a better organization.
Eni demands that there shall be no harassment or mobbing behaviours in personal working relationships either inside or outside the company. Such behaviours are all forbidden, without exceptions, and are:

 the creation of an intimidating, hostile, isolating or in any case discriminatory environment for individual employees or groups of employees;
 unjustified interference in the work performed by others;
 the placing of obstacles in the way of the work prospects and expectations of others merely for reasons of personal competitiveness or because of other employees.

E-19


Any form of violence or harassment, either sexual harassment or harassment based on personal and cultural diversity, is forbidden. Such harassment is for instance:

 subordinating decisions on someone’s working life to the acceptance of sexual attentions, or personal and cultural diversity;
 obtaining sexual attentions using the influence of one’s role;
 proposing private interpersonal relations despite the recipient’s explicit or reasonably clear distaste;
alluding to disabilities and physical or psychic impairment, or to forms of cultural, religious or sexual diversity.

5.5. Abuse of alcohol or drugs and no smoking
All Eni’s People shall personally contribute to promoting and maintaining a climate of common respect in the workplace; particular attention is paid to respect of the feelings of others.
Eni will therefore consider individuals who work under the effect of alcohol or drugs, or substances with similar effect, during the performance of their work activities and in the workplace, as being aware of the risk they cause. Chronic addiction to such substances, when it affects work performance, shall be considered similar to the above mentioned events in terms of contractual consequences; Eni is committed to favour social action in this field as provided for by employment contracts.
It is forbidden to:

 hold, consume, offer or give for whatever reason, drugs or substances with similar effect, at work and in the workplace;
 smoke in the workplace. Eni supports voluntary initiatives addressed to People to help them quit smoking and, in identifying possible smoking areas, shall take into particular consideration the condition of those suffering physical discomfort from exposure to smoke in the workplace shared with smokers and requesting to be protected from "passive smoking" in their place of work.

 

III. TOOLS FOR IMPLEMENTING THE CODE OF ETHICS

1. SYSTEM OF INTERNAL CONTROL

Eni undertakes to promote and maintain an adequate system of internal control, i.e. all the necessary or useful tools for addressing, managing and checking activities in the company, aimed at ensuring compliance with corporate laws and procedures, at protecting corporate assets, efficiently managing activities and providing precise and complete accounting and financial information.
The responsibility for implementing an effective system of internal control is shared at every level of Eni’s organizational structure; therefore, all Eni’s People, according to their functions and responsibilities, shall define and actively participate in the correct functioning of the system of internal control.
Eni promotes the dissemination, at every level of its organization, of policies and procedures characterized by awareness of the existence of controls and by an informed and voluntary control oriented mentality; consequently, Eni’s management in the first place and all Eni’s People in any case shall contribute to and participate in Eni’s system of internal control and, with a positive attitude, involve its collaborators in this respect.
Each employee shall be held responsible for the corporate tangible and intangible assets relevant to his/her job. No employee can make, or let others make, improper use of assets and equipment belonging to Eni.
Any practices and attitudes linked to the perpetration or to the participation in the perpetration of frauds are forbidden without any exception.
Control and supervisory bodies, Eni Internal Audit department and appointed auditing companies shall have full access to all data, documents and information necessary to perform their own relevant activities.

1.1. Conflicts of interest
Eni acknowledges and respects the right of its People to take part in investments, business and other kinds of activities other than the activity performed in the interest of Eni, provided that such activities are permitted by law and are compatible with the obligations assumed towards Eni. The Self-Regulatory Code of Eni SpA governs any possible conflict of interest of directors and statutory auditors of Eni SpA.
Eni’s management and employees shall avoid and report any conflicts of interest between personal and family economic activities and their tasks within the company. In particular, everyone shall point out any specific situations and activities of economic or financial interest (owner or member) to them or, as far as they know, of economic or financial interest to relatives of theirs or relatives by marriage within the 2nd degree of kinship, or to persons actually living with them, also involving suppliers, customers, competitors, third parties, or the relevant controlling companies or subsidiaries, and shall point whether they perform corporate administration or control or management functions therein.
Moreover, conflicts of interest are determined by the following situations:

use of one’s position in the company, or of information, or of business opportunities acquired during one’s work, to one’s undue benefit or to the undue benefit of third parties;

E-20


the performing of any type of work for suppliers, sub-suppliers and competitors by employees and/or their relatives.

In any case, Eni’s management and employees shall avoid any situation and activity where a conflict with the Company’s interests may arise, or which can interfere with their ability to make impartial decisions in the best interests of Eni and in full accordance with the principles and contents of the Code, or in general with their ability to fully comply with their functions and responsibilities. Any situation that may constitute or give rise to a conflict of interest shall be immediately reported to one’s superior within management, or to the body one belongs to, and to the Guarantor. Furthermore, the party concerned shall abstain from taking part in the operational/decision-making process, and the relevant superior within management, or the relevant body, shall:

 identify the operational solutions suitable for ensuring, in the specific case, transparency and fairness of behaviours in the performance of activities;
 transmit to the parties concerned – and for information to one’s superior, as well as to the Guarantor – the necessary written instructions;
 file the received and transmitted documentation.

1.2.Transparency of accounting records
Accounting transparency is grounded on the use of true, accurate and complete information which form the basis for the entries in the books of accounts. Each member of company bodies, of management or employee shall cooperate, within their own field of competence, in order to have operational events properly and timely registered in the books of accounts.
It is forbidden to behave in a way that may adversely affect transparency and traceability of the information within financial statements.
For each transaction, the proper supporting evidence has to be maintained in order to allow:

 easy and punctual accounting entries;
 identification of different levels of responsibility, as well as of task distribution and segregation;
 accurate representation of the transaction so as to avoid the probability of any material or interpretative error.

Each record shall reflect exactly what is shown by the supporting evidence. All Eni’s People shall cause that the documentation can be easily traced and filed according to logical criteria.
Eni’s People who become aware of any omissions, forgery, negligence in accounting or in the documents on which accounting is based, shall bring the facts to the attention of their superior, or to the body they belong to, and to the Guarantor.


2. HEALTH, SAFETY, ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC SAFETY PROTECTION

Eni’s activities shall be carried out in compliance with applicable worker health and safety, environmental and public safety protection agreements, international standards and laws, regulations, administrative practices and national policies of the Countries where it operates.
Eni actively contributes as appropriate to the promotion of scientific and technological development aimed at protecting the environment and natural resources. The operative management of such activities shall be carried out according to advanced criteria for the protection of the environment and energy efficiency, with the aim of creating better working conditions and protecting the health and safety of employees as well as the environment.
Eni’s People shall, within their areas of responsibility, actively participate in the process of risk prevention as well as environmental, public safety and health protection for themselves, their colleagues and third parties.


3. RESEARCH, INNOVATION AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROTECTION

Eni promotes research and innovation activities by management and employees, within their functions and responsibilities. Any intellectual assets generated by such activities are an important and fundamental heritage of Eni.
Research and innovation focus in particular on the promotion of products, tools, processes and behaviours supporting energy efficiency, reduction of environmental impact, attention to health and safety of employees, of customers and of the local communities where Eni operates, and in general sustainability of business activities.
Eni’s People shall actively contribute, within their functions and responsibilities, to managing intellectual property in order to allow its development, protection and enhancement.


4. CONFIDENTIALITY

4.1. Protection of business secret
Eni’s activities constantly require the acquisition, storing, processing, communication and dissemination of information, documents and other data regarding negotiations, administrative proceedings, financial transactions, and know-how (contracts, deeds, reports, notes, studies, drawings, pictures, software, etc.) that may not be disclosed to the

E-21


outside pursuant to contractual agreements, or whose inopportune or untimely disclosure may be detrimental to corporate interest.
Without prejudice to the transparency of the activities carried out and to the information obligations imposed by the provisions in force, Eni’s People shall ensure the confidentiality required by the circumstances for each piece of news they have got to know of because of their working function.
Any information, knowledge and data acquired or processed during one’s work or because of one’s tasks at Eni, belong to Eni and may not be used, communicated or disclosed without specific authorization of one’s superior within management in compliance with specific procedures.

4.2. Protection of privacy
Eni is committed to protecting information concerning its People and third parties, whether generated or obtained inside Eni or in the conduct of Eni’s business, and to avoiding improper use of any such information.
Eni intends to guarantee that processing of personal data within its structures respects fundamental rights and freedoms, as well as the dignity of the parties concerned, as contemplated by the legal provisions in force.
Personal data must be processed in a lawful and fair way and, in any case, the data collected and stored is only that which is necessary for certain, explicit and lawful purposes. Data shall be stored for a period of time no longer than necessary for the purposes of collection.
Eni undertakes moreover to adopt suitable preventive safety measures for all databases storing and keeping personal data, in order to avoid any risks of destruction and losses or of unauthorized access or unallowed processing.
Eni’s People shall:

 obtain and process only data that are necessary and adequate to the aims of their work and responsibilities;
 obtain and process such data only within specified procedures, and store said data in a way that prevents unauthorized parties from having access to it;
 represent and order data in a way ensuring that any party with access authorization may easily get an outline thereof which is as accurate, exhausting and truthful as possible;
disclose such data pursuant to specific procedures or subject to the express authorization by their superior and, in any case, only after having checked that such data may be disclosed, also making reference to absolute or relative constraints concerning third parties bound to Eni by a relation of whatever nature and, if applicable, after having obtained their consent.

4.3. Membership in associations, participation in initiatives, events or external meetings
Membership in associations, participation in initiatives, events or external meetings is supported by Eni if compatible with the working or professional activity provided. Membership and participation considered as such are:

 membership in associations, participation in conferences, workshops, seminars, courses;
 drawing up of articles, papers and publications in general;
 participation in public events in general.

In this regard, Eni’s management and employees in charge of illustrating, or providing to the outside data or news concerning Eni’s objectives, aims, results and points of view, shall not only comply with corporate procedures relating to market abuse, but also obtain the necessary authorization from their superior within management for the lines of action to follow and the texts as well as reports drawn up, such as to agree on contents with the relevant Eni Corporate structure.

 

IV. CODE OF ETHICS SCOPE OF APPLICATION AND REFERENCE STRUCTURES

The principles and contents of the Code apply to Eni’s People and activities.
Any listed subsidiaries and power & gas sector subsidiaries subject to unbundling shall receive the Code and adopt it, adjusting it – if necessary – to the characteristics of their company, consistently with their management independence.
The representatives indicated by Eni in the company bodies of partially owned companies, in consortia and in joint ventures shall promote the principles and contents of the Code within their own respective areas of competence.
Directors and management must be the first to give concrete form to the principles and contents of the Code, by assuming responsibility for them both towards the inside and the outside and by enhancing trust, cohesion and a sense of team-work, as well as providing a behaviour model for their collaborators in order to have them comply with the Code and make questions and suggestions on specific provisions.
To achieve full compliance with the Code, each of Eni’s People may even apply directly to the Guarantor.


1. OBLIGATION TO KNOW THE CODE AND TO REPORT ANY POSSIBLE VIOLATION THEREOF

Each of Eni’s People is expected to know the principles and contents of the Code as well as the reference procedures governing own functions and responsibilities.
Each of Eni’s People shall:

refrain from all conduct contrary to such principles, contents and procedures;

E-22


 carefully select, as long as within their field of competence, their collaborators, and have them fully comply with the Code;
 require any third parties having relations with Eni to confirm that they know the Code;
 immediately report to their superiors or the body they belong to, and to the Guarantor, any remarks of theirs or information supplied by Stakeholders concerning a possible violation or any request to violate the Code; reports of possible violations shall be sent in compliance with conditions provided for by the specific procedures established by the Board of Statutory Auditors and by the Watch Structure of Eni SpA;
 cooperate with the Guarantor and with the relevant departments according to the applicable specific procedures in ascertaining any violations;
 adopt prompt corrective measures whenever necessary, and in any case prevent any type of retaliation.

Eni’s People are not allowed to conduct personal investigations, nor to exchange information, except to their superiors, or to the body that they belong to, and to the Guarantor. If, after notifying a supposed violation any of Eni’s People feels that he or she has been subject to retaliation, then he or she may directly apply to the Guarantor.


2. REFERENCE STRUCTURES AND SUPERVISION

Eni is committed to ensuring, even through the Guarantor’s appointment:

 the widest dissemination of the principles and contents of the Code among Eni’s People and the other Stakeholders, providing any possible tools for understanding and clarifying the interpretation and the implementation of the Code, as well as for updating the Code as required to meet evolving civil sensibility and relevant laws;
 the execution of checks on any notice of violation of the Code principles and contents or of reference procedures; an objective evaluation of the facts and, if necessary, the adoption of appropriate sanctions; that no one may suffer any retaliation whatsoever for having provided information regarding possible violations of the Code or of reference procedures.

2.1. Guarantor of the Code of Ethics
The Code of Ethics is, among other things, a compulsory general principle of the Organizational, Management and Control Model adopted by Eni SpA according to the Italian provision on the "administrative liability of legal entities deriving from offences" contained in Legislative Decree No. 231 of June 8, 2001.
Eni SpA assigns the functions of Guarantor to the Watch Structure established pursuant to the above mentioned Model. Each direct or indirect subsidiary, in Italy and abroad, entrusts the function of Guarantor to its own Watch Structure by formal deed of the relevant corporate body.
The Guarantor is entrusted with the task of:

 promoting the implementation of the Code and the issue of reference procedures; reporting and proposing to the CEO of the company the useful initiatives for a greater dissemination and knowledge of the Code, also in order to prevent any recurrences of violations;
 promoting specific communication and training programs for Eni’s management and employees;
 investigating reports of any violation of the Code by initiating proper inquiry procedures; taking action at the request of Eni’s People in the event of receiving reports that violations of the Code have not been properly dealt with or in the event of being informed of any retaliation against Eni’s people for having reported violations;
 notifying relevant structures of the results of investigations relevant to the adoption of possible penalties; informing the relevant line/area structures about the results of investigations relevant to the adoption of the necessary measures.

Moreover, the Guarantor of Eni SpA submits to the Internal Control Committee and to the Board of Statutory Auditors as well as to the Chairman and to the Chief Executive Officer, which report about it to the Board of Directors, a six-monthly report on the implementation and possible need for updating the Code.
For the performance of its tasks, the Guarantor of Eni SpA avails itself of "Technical Secretariat of the Watch Structure 231 of Eni SpA" that reports thereto and is supported by the relevant Structures of Eni SpA. The Technical Secretariat is responsible for starting and maintaining an adequate reporting and communication flow to and from the Guarantors of subsidiaries.
Each information flow is to be sent to the following email address:
organismo_di_vigilanza@eni.it

2.2. Code Promotion Team
The Code is made available to Eni’s People in compliance with applicable standards, and is also available on the internet and intranet sites of Eni SpA and of subsidiaries.
In order to promote the knowledge and facilitate the implementation of the Code, a Code Promotion Team reporting to the Guarantor of Eni SpA has been established. The Team makes available within Eni all possible tools for understanding and clarifying the interpretation and the implementation of the Code.
The members of the Team are chosen by the Chief Executive Officer of Eni SpA upon proposal of the Guarantor of Eni SpA.

E-23


3. CODE REVIEW

The Code review is approved by the Board of Directors of Eni SpA, upon proposal of the Chief Executive Officer with the agreement of the Chairman, after hearing the opinion of the Board of Statutory Auditors.
The proposal is made taking into consideration the Stakeholders’ evaluation with reference to the principles and contents of the Code, promoting active contribution and notification of possible deficiencies by Stakeholders themselves.


4. CONTRACTUAL VALUE OF THE CODE

Respect of the Code’s rules is an essential part of the contractual obligations of all Eni’s People pursuant to and in accordance with applicable law.
Any violation of the Code’s principles and contents may be considered as a violation of primary obligations under labour relations or of the rules of discipline and can entail the consequences provided for by law, including termination of the work contract and compensation for damages arising out of any violation.

 

 

 

 

E-24


Certifications as separate documents filed as exhibits

EXHIBIT 12.1

Certification

 

I, Paolo Scaroni, certify that:

 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Eni SpA;

 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:

 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 14, 2009April 26, 2010

/s/PAOLO SCARONI


Paolo Scaroni
Title: Chief Executive Officer

 

E-25


EXHIBIT 12.2

Certification

 

I, Alessandro Bernini, certify that:

 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Eni SpA;

 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:

 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 14, 2009April 26, 2010

 

/s/ALESSANDRO BERNINI


Alessandro Bernini
Title: Chief Financial Officer

E-26


EXHIBIT 13.1

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

 

For purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Eni SpA, a company incorporated under the laws of Italy (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

(i) the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 20082009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 14, 2009April 26, 2010

 

/s/PAOLO SCARONI


Paolo Scaroni
Title: Chief Executive Officer

 

The foregoing certification is not deemed filed for purpose of Section 18 of the Exchange Act and not incorporated by reference with any filing under the Securities Act.

E-27


EXHIBIT 13.2

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

 

For purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Eni SpA, a company incorporated under the laws of Italy (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

(i) the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 20082009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 14, 2009April 26, 2010

 

/s/ALESSANDRO BERNINI


Alessandro Bernini
Title: Chief Financial Officer

 

The foregoing certification is not deemed filed for purpose of Section 18 of the Exchange Act and not incorporated by reference with any filing under the Securities Act.

 

E-28


EXHIBIT 15.a(i)

DeGolyer And MacNaughton
5001 Spring Valley Road
Suite 800 East
Dallas, Texas 75244

March 18, 2010

Eni S.p.A.
E&P Division
Via Emilia 1
20097 San Donato Milanese
Milano, Italy

We hereby consent to references to DeGolyer and MacNaughton in the sections entitled "Part I - Item 4 Business Overview-Exploration and Production" and "Part III - Item 18 Financial Statement-Supplemental Oil and Gas Information" within the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009, of Eni S.p.A. (the Form 20-F) and to the inclusion of our letter dated November 6, 2009, regarding our statements pertaining to internal reserves guidelines of Eni S.p.A. and our third-party letter report dated February 26, 2010, concerning properties in Algeria, Angola, Congo, Egypt, and the United Kingdom, relating to our evaluation of certain oil and gas properties of Eni S.p.A., which are included as exhibits in the Form 20-F.

Very truly yours,
/s/ DEGOLYER AND MACNAUGHTON
DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON
Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-716

E-29


EXHIBIT 15.a(ii)

March 8, 2010

Eni S.p.A
E&P Division
Ms. Manuela Feudaroli
Vice President Reserves
Via Emilia 1
20097 San Donato Milanese
Milano, Italy

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

Dear Ms. Feudaroli:

Ryder Scott Company, L.P. confirms its independence with respect to Eni S.p.A. and hereby consents to the references to Ryder Scott Company, L.P. and the inclusion of its report dated February 23, 2010 and information thereof in Eni S.p.A's annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 and other filings as required to fulfill Italian and U.S.A. obligations.

Very truly yours,
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L. P.
TBPE Firm Registration No. F-1580
/s/ HERMAN G. ACUÑA
Herman G. Acuña, P.E.
TBPE License No. 92254
Managing Senior Vice President-International

E-30


EXHIBIT 15.a(iii)

DeGolyer And MacNaughton
5001 Spring Valley Road
Suite 800 East
Dallas, Texas 75244

This is a digital representation of a DeGolyer and MacNaughton report.

This file is intended to be a manifestation of certain data in the subject report and as such are subject to the same conditions thereof. The information and data contained in this file may be subject to misinterpretation; therefore, the signed and bound copy of this report should be considered the only authoritative source of such information.

E-31


DeGolyer And MacNaughton
5001 Spring Valley Road
Suite 800 East
Dallas, Texas 75244

February 26, 2010

Eni S.p.A.
E&P Division
Ms. Manuela Feudaroli
Vice President, Reserves
Via Emilia 1
20097 San Donato Milanese
Milano, Italy

Dear Ms. Feudaroli:

Pursuant to your request, we have conducted an independent evaluation to serve as a reserves audit of the net proved crude oil, natural gas liquids (NGL), and natural gas reserves, as of December 31, 2009, of certain properties in Algeria, Angola, Congo, Egypt, and the United Kingdom owned by Eni S.p.A. (Eni). Eni has represented that these properties account for 21 percent, on a net equivalent barrel basis, of Eni's net proved reserves as of December 31, 2009, and that Eni's net proved reserves estimates have been prepared in accordance with the reserves definitions of Rules 4-10(a) (1)-(32) of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of the United States. We have reviewed information provided to us by Eni that it represents to be Eni's estimates of the net reserves, as of December 31, 2009, for the same properties as those which we have independently evaluated.

Reserves included herein are expressed as net reserves as represented by Eni. Gross reserves are defined as the total estimated petroleum to be produced from these properties after December 31, 2009. Net reserves are defined as that portion of the gross reserves attributable to the interests owned by Eni after deducting interests owned by others.

Estimates of oil, NGL, and natural gas should be regarded only as estimates that may change as further production history and additional information become available. Not only are such reserves estimates based on that information which is

E-32


DeGolyer And MacNaughton

2

currently available, but such estimates are also subject to the uncertainties inherent in the application of judgmental factors in interpreting such information.

Data used in this audit were obtained from reviews with Eni personnel, Eni files, from records on file with the appropriate regulatory agencies, and from public sources. In the preparation of this report we have relied, without independent verification, upon such information furnished by Eni with respect to property interests, production from such properties, current costs of operation and development, current prices for production, agreements relating to current and future operations and sale of production, and various other information and data that were accepted as represented. A field examination of the properties was not considered necessary for the purposes of this report.

Methodology and Procedures

Our estimates of reserves were prepared by the use of standard geological and engineering methods generally accepted by the petroleum industry. The method or combination of methods used in the analysis of each reservoir was tempered by experience with similar reservoirs, stage of development, quality and completeness of basic data, and production history.

When applicable, the volumetric method was used to estimate the original oil in place (OOIP) and the original gas in place (OGIP). Structure and isopach maps were constructed to estimate reservoir volume. Electrical logs, radioactivity logs, core analyses, and other available data were used to prepare these maps as well as to estimate representative values for porosity and water saturation. When adequate data were available and when circumstances justified, material balance and other engineering methods were used to estimate OOIP or OGIP.

Estimates of ultimate recovery were obtained after applying recovery factors to OOIP or OGIP. These recovery factors were based on consideration of the type of energy inherent in the reservoirs, analyses of the petroleum, the structural positions of the properties, and the production histories. When applicable, material balance and other engineering methods were used to estimate recovery factors. An analysis of reservoir performance, including production rate, reservoir pressure, and gas-oil ratio behavior, was used in the estimation of reserves.

E-33


DeGolyer And MacNaughton

3

For depletion-type reservoirs or those whose performance disclosed a reliable decline in producing-rate trends or other diagnostic characteristics, reserves were estimated by the application of appropriate decline curves or other performance relationships. In the analyses of production-decline curves, reserves were estimated only to the limits of economic production or to the limit of production licenses as appropriate.

Definition of Reserves

Petroleum reserves included in this report are classified as proved. Reserves classifications used for our estimates of proved reserves are in accordance with the reserves definitions of Rules 4-10(a) (1)-(32) of Regulation S-X of the SEC. Eni has represented that its estimates of proved reserves are in accordance with the reserves definitions of Rules 4-10(a) (1)-(32) of Regulation S-X of the SEC. Reserves are judged to be economically producible in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions and assuming continuation of current regulatory practices using conventional production methods and equipment. In the analyses of production-decline curves, reserves were estimated only to the limit of economic rates of production under existing economic and operating conditions using prices and costs consistent with the effective date of this report, including consideration of changes in existing prices provided only by contractual arrangements but not including escalations based upon future conditions. The petroleum reserves are classified as follows:

Proved oil and gas reserves – Proved oil and gas reserves are those quantities of oil and gas, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible—from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulations—prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the estimation. The project to extract the hydrocarbons must have commenced or the operator must be reasonably certain that it will commence the project within a reasonable time.

E-34


DeGolyer And MacNaughton

4

(i) The area of the reservoir considered as proved includes:

(A) The area identified by drilling and limited by fluid contacts, if any, and (B) Adjacent undrilled portions of the reservoir that can, with reasonable certainty, be judged to be continuous with it and to contain economically producible oil or gas on the basis of available geoscience and engineering data.

(ii) In the absence of data on fluid contacts, proved quantities in a reservoir are limited by the lowest known hydrocarbons (LKH) as seen in a well penetration unless geoscience, engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establishes a lower contact with reasonable certainty.

(iii) Where direct observation from well penetrations has defined a highest known oil (HKO) elevation and the potential exists for an associated gas cap, proved oil reserves may be assigned in the structurally higher portions of the reservoir only if geoscience, engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establish the higher contact with reasonable certainty.

(iv) Reserves which can be produced economically through application of improved recovery techniques (including, but not limited to, fluid injection) are included in the proved classification when:

(A) Successful testing by a pilot project in an area of the reservoir with properties no more favorable than in the reservoir as a whole, the operation of an installed program in the reservoir or an analogous reservoir, or other evidence using reliable technology establishes the reasonable certainty of the engineering analysis on which the project or program was based; and (B) The project has been approved for development by all necessary parties and entities, including governmental entities.

(v) Existing economic conditions include prices and costs at which economic producibility from a reservoir is to be determined. The price shall be the average price during the 12-month period prior to the ending date of the period covered

E-35


DeGolyer And MacNaughton

5

by the report, determined as an unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within such period, unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements, excluding escalations based upon future conditions.

Developed oil and gas reserves – Developed oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that can be expected to be recovered:

(i) Through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods or in which the cost of the required equipment is relatively minor compared to the cost of a new well; and

(ii) Through installed extraction equipment and infrastructure operational at the time of the reserves estimate if the extraction is by means not involving a well.

Undeveloped oil and gas reserves – Undeveloped oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion.

(i) Reserves on undrilled acreage shall be limited to those directly offsetting development spacing areas that are reasonably certain of production when drilled, unless evidence using reliable technology exists that establishes reasonable certainty of economic producibility at greater distances.

(ii) Undrilled locations can be classified as having undeveloped reserves only if a development plan has been adopted indicating that they are scheduled to be drilled within five years, unless the specific circumstances justify a longer time.

(iii) Under no circumstances shall estimates for undeveloped reserves be attributable to any acreage for which an application of fluid injection or other improved recovery technique is contemplated, unless such techniques have been proved effective by actual projects in the same reservoir or an analogous reservoir, as defined in [section 210.4-10 (a)

E-36


DeGolyer And MacNaughton

6

Definitions], or by other evidence using reliable technology establishing reasonable certainty.

Primary Economic Assumptions

The following economic assumptions were used for estimating existing and future prices and costs:

Oil and NGL Prices

Eni has represented that the oil and NGL prices were based on a 12-month average price (reference price), calculated as the unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within the 12-month period prior to the end of the reporting period, unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements. Eni supplied appropriate differentials by field to the relevant reference prices and the prices were held constant thereafter.

Natural Gas Prices

Eni has represented that the natural gas prices were based on a reference price, calculated as the unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within the 12-month period prior to the end of the reporting period, unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements. Eni supplied appropriate differentials by field to the relevant reference prices and the prices were held constant thereafter.

Operating Expenses and Capital Costs

Operating expenses and capital costs, based on information provided by Eni, were used in estimating future costs required to operate the properties. In certain cases, future costs, either higher or lower than existing costs, may have been used because of anticipated changes in operating conditions. These costs were not escalated for inflation.

E-37


DeGolyer And MacNaughton

7

While the oil and gas industry may be subject to regulatory changes from time to time that could affect an industry participant's ability to recover its oil and gas reserves, we are not aware of any such governmental actions which would restrict the recovery of the December 31, 2009, estimated oil and gas volumes. The reserves estimated in this report can be produced under current regulatory guidelines.

Eni has represented that its estimated net proved reserves attributable to the reviewed properties in Algeria, Angola, Congo, Egypt, and the United Kingdom are based on the definitions of proved reserves of the SEC. Eni represents that its estimates of the net proved reserves attributable to these properties, which represent 21 percent of Eni's reserves on a net equivalent basis, are as follows, expressed in millions of barrels (MMbbl), billions of cubic feet (Bcf), and millions of barrels of oil equivalent (MMboe):

  

Estimated by Eni
Net Proved Reserves as of
December 31, 2009

  
  

Oil and
NGL
(MMbbl)

 

Natural
Gas
(Bcf)

 

Oil
Equivalent
(MMboe)

  
 
 
Properties reviewed by DeGolyer and MacNaughton      
Total Proved 

952

 

2,470

 

1,383

       
Note: Gas is converted to oil equivalent using a factor of 5,742 cubic feet of gas per 1 barrel of oil equivalent.

In comparing the detailed net proved reserves estimates prepared by us and by Eni, we have found differences, both positive and negative. It is our opinion that the net proved reserves estimates prepared by Eni on the properties reviewed by us and referred to above, when compared on the basis of net equivalent barrels, in aggregate, do not differ materially from those prepared by us, with tolerance of 5 percent or less.

E-38


DeGolyer And MacNaughton

8

DeGolyer and MacNaughton is an independent petroleum engineering consulting firm that has been providing petroleum consulting services throughout the world for over 70 years. DeGolyer and MacNaughton does not have any financial interest, including stock ownership, in Eni. Our fees were not contingent on the results of our evaluation. This letter report has been prepared at the request of Eni and should not be used for purposes other than those for which it is intended. DeGolyer and MacNaughton has used all procedures and methods that it considers necessary to prepare this report.

Submitted,
/s/ DEGOLYER AND MACNAUGHTON
DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON
Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-716

/s/ LLOYD W. CADE, P.E.
Lloyd W. Cade, P.E.
Senior Vice President
DeGolyer and MacNaughton

E-39


DeGolyer And MacNaughton

CERTIFICATE of QUALIFICATION

I, Lloyd W. Cade Petroleum Engineer with DeGolyer and MacNaughton, 5001 Spring Valley Road, Suite 800 East, Dallas, Texas, 75244 U.S.A., hereby certify:

1.That I am a Senior Vice President with DeGolyer and MacNaughton, which company did prepare the letter report addressed to Eni dated February 26, 2010, and that I, as Senior Vice President, was responsible for the preparation of this report.
2.That I attended Kansas State University, and that I graduated with a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering in the year 1982; that I am a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of Texas; that I am a member of the International Society of Petroleum Engineers; and that I have approximately twenty-seven (27) years of experience in oil and gas reservoir studies and reserves evaluations.

SIGNED: February 26, 2010

/s/ LLOYD W. CADE, P.E.
Lloyd W. Cade, P.E.
Senior Vice President
DeGolyer and MacNaughton

E-40


EXHIBIT 15.a(iv)

Eni S.p.A.

Estimated

Future Reserves

Attributable to Certain Interests

SEC Parameters

As of

December 31, 2009

/s/HERMAN G. ACUÑA, P.E.

Herman G. Acuña, P.E.
TBPE License No. 92254
Managing Senior vice President-International

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.
TBPE Firm Registration No. F-1580

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

E-41


February 23, 2010

Eni S.p.A.
E&P Division
Ms. Manuela Feudaroli
Vice President Reserves
Via Emilia 1
20097 San Donato Milanese
Milano, Italy

Dear Ms. Feudaroli:

At your request, Ryder Scott Company has prepared an estimate of the proved reserves, future production and income attributable to certain properties of ENI S.p.A., as of December 31, 2009. The subject properties are located in the countries of:

• Ecuador• Trinidad & Tobago
• Libya• United States of America

The reserves and income data were estimated based on the definitions and disclosure guidelines contained in the United States Securities and Exchange Commission Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting, Final Rule released January 14, 2009 in the Federal Register (SEC regulations). The conclusions of our third party study, completed on January 25, 2010, are discussed herein.

The conclusions discussed in this report, as of December 31, 2009, are related to hydrocarbon prices. The hydrocarbon prices used in the preparation of this report are based on the average prices during the 12-month period prior to the ending date of the period covered in this report, determined as unweighted arithmetic averages of the prices in effect on the first-day-of-the-month for each month within such period, unless prices were defined by contractual arrangements as required by the SEC regulations. Actual future prices may vary significantly from the prices required by SEC regulations; therefore, the conclusions of our third party study may differ significantly from the discussion below.

ENI S.p.A. has elected to represent that Ryder Scott Company conducted these 3rd party independent estimations; accordingly, Ryder Scott Company has prepared this report for inclusion as an exhibit to the relevant registration statement or other Commission filings by ENI S.p.A.

Scope of 3rd Party Independent Audit

At the request of ENI S.p.A., Ryder Scott Company conducted an independent estimation of the reserves, future production and income associated with certain assets in which ENI S.p.A. owns an interest. Ryder Scott Company was provided with both interpreted and uninterpreted data. Based on this information, Ryder Scott Company conducted the necessary studies to estimate and audit the proved reserves to render the opinions expressed herein conforming with our understanding of the definition as set forth in the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulations Part 210.4-10(a). An abridged version of the SEC reserves definitions from 210.4-10(a) entitled "Petroleum Reserves Definitions is included as an attachment to this report. Furthermore, ENI S.p.A. has requested that we

E-42


Eni S.p.A.
February 23, 2010
Page 2

compare the proved reserves independently evaluated by us to the reserves prepared by ENI S.p.A. according to the SEC regulations to fulfill the scope of the audit.

During our investigations, no attempt was made to quantify or otherwise account for any accumulated gas production imbalances that may exist. ENI S.p.A. includes fuel gas in their estimation of net reserves, therefore, our conclusion herein are inclusive of these volumes.

While it may reasonably be anticipated that the future prices received for the sale of production and the operating costs and other costs relating to such production may also increase or decrease from existing levels, such changes were, in accordance with rules adopted by the SEC, omitted from consideration in making this evaluation.

Proved oil and gas reserves are those quantities of oil and gas, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible from a given date forward. However, most of the parameters that define the reserves of a reservoir cannot be measured directly, and must be estimated indirectly through geologic and reservoir engineering analysis and interpretations. Moreover, estimates of reserves may increase or decrease as a result of future operations, effects of regulation by governmental agencies or geopolitical risks. As a result, the estimates of oil and gas reserves have an intrinsic uncertainty. The reserves included in this report are therefore estimates only and should not be construed as being exact quantities. They may or may not be actually recovered, and if recovered, the revenues therefrom and the actual costs related thereto could be more or less than the estimated amounts.

The conclusion reported herein are limited to the period prior to expiration of current contracts providing the legal right to produce or a revenue interest in such production unless evidence indicates that contract renewal is reasonably certain. Furthermore, properties in the different countries may be subjected to significantly varying contractual fiscal terms that affect the net revenue to ENI S.p.A. for the production of these volumes. The prices and economic return received for these net volumes can vary significantly based on the terms of these contracts. Therefore, when applicable, Ryder Scott reviewed the fiscal terms of such contracts and discussed with ENI S.p.A. the net economic benefit attributed to such operations for the determination of the net hydrocarbon volumes and income thereof. Ryder Scott has not conducted an exhaustive audit or verification of such contractual information. Neither our review of such contractual information or our acceptance of ENI S.p.A.'s representations regarding such contractual information should be construed as a legal or accounting opinion on this matter.

Ryder Scott did not evaluate country and geopolitical risks in the countries where ENI S.p.A. operates or has interests. ENI S.p.A.'s operations may be subject to various levels of governmental controls and regulations. These controls and regulations may include matters relating to land tenure, drilling, production practices, environmental protection, marketing and pricing policies, royalties, various taxes and levies including income tax, and foreign trade and investment and are subject to change from time to time. Such changes in governmental regulations and policies may cause volumes of reserves actually recovered and amounts of income actually received to differ significantly from the estimated quantities.

The conclusions presented herein were based upon a detailed study of the properties in which ENI S.p.A. owns an interest; however, we have not made any field examination of the properties. No consideration was given in this report to potential environmental liabilities that may exist nor were any costs included for potential liability to restore and clean up damages, if any, caused by past operating practices.

E-43


Eni S.p.A.
February 23, 2010
Page 3

The properties reviewed by Ryder Scott Company are located in the following countries and do not represent the entire asset portfolio from ENI S.p.A.

• Ecuador• Trinidad & Tobago
• Libya• United States of America

ENI S.p.A. has indicated that the proved net reserves attributable to the properties that we reviewed account for 6.5 percent of their total proved net remaining hydrocarbon reserves.

Data, Methods and Procedures

In performing our estimates, we have relied upon data furnished by ENI S.p.A. with respect to property interests owned, production and well tests from examined wells, historical costs of operation and development, product prices, geological structural and isochore maps. well logs, core analyses, and pressure measurements, etc. In general, the reserve estimates for the properties that we reviewed are based on data available through December 31, 2009.

These data were accepted as authentic and sufficient for determining the reserves unless, during the course of our examination, a matter of question came to our attention in which case the data were not accepted until all questions were satisfactorily resolved.

As prescribed by the Society of Petroleum Engineers in Paragraph 2.2(f) of the Standards Pertaining to the Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information a reserves audit is defined as "the process of reviewing certain of the pertinent facts interpreted and assumptions made that have resulted in an estimate of reserves prepared by others and the rendering of an opinion about (1) the appropriateness of the methodologies employed, (2) the adequacy and quality of the data relied upon, (3) the depth and thoroughness of the reserves estimation process, (4) the classification of reserves appropriate to the relevant definitions used, and (5) the reasonableness of the estimated reserve quantities."

The reserves included herein were estimated using generally accepted petroleum engineering and evaluation principles for the estimation of future reserves. In general, these reserves were estimated by performance methods, volumetric or material balance methods; however, other methods were used in certain cases where characteristics of the data, in our opinion, indicated such other methods were more appropriate.

Our forecasts of future production rates are based on historical performance from wells now on production. Test data and other related information were used to estimate the anticipated initial production rates for those wells or locations that are not currently producing. If no production decline trend has been established, future production rates were held constant, or adjusted for the effects of curtailment where appropriate, until a decline in ability to produce was anticipated. An estimated rate of decline was then applied to depletion of the reserves. If a decline trend has been established, this trend was used as the basis for estimating future production rates. For reserves not yet on production, sales were estimated to commence at an anticipated date furnished by ENI S.p.A. The future production rates from wells now on production may be more or less than estimated because of changes in market demand or allowables set by regulatory bodies. Wells or locations that are not currently producing may start producing earlier or later than anticipated in our estimates.

To estimate economically recoverable oil and gas reserves and related future net cash flows, we consider many factors and assumptions including, but not limited to, the use of reservoir parameters derived from geological, geophysical and engineering data which cannot be measured directly,

E-44


Eni S.p.A.
February 23, 2010
Page 4

economic criteria based on current costs and SEC pricing requirements, and forecasts of future production rates. Under the SEC regulations 210.4-10(a)(22)(v) and (26), proved reserves must be demonstrated to be economically producible based on existing economic conditions including the prices and costs at which economic producibility from a reservoir is to be determined as of the effective date of the report.

As previously stated, the hydrocarbon prices used herein are based on the average prices during the 12-month period prior to the ending date of the period covered in this report, determined as the unweighted arithmetic averages of the prices in effect on the first-day-of-the-month for each month within such period, unless prices were defined by contractual arrangements. For hydrocarbon products sold under contract, the contract prices including fixed and determinable escalations, exclusive of inflation adjustments, were used until expiration of the contract. Upon contract expiration, the prices were adjusted to the 12-month unweighted arithmetic average as previously described.

ENI S.p.A. has informed us that the operating costs for the assets in this report are based on the operating expense reports of ENI S.p.A. and include only those costs directly applicable to the leases or wells. The operating costs include a portion of general and administrative costs allocated directly to the assets. When applicable for operated properties, the operating costs include an appropriate level of corporate general administrative and overhead costs. No deduction was made for loan repayments, interest expenses, or exploration and development prepayments that were not charged directly to the assets. Development costs were furnished to us by ENI S.p.A. and are based on authorizations for expenditure for the proposed work or actual costs for similar projects. The estimated net cost of abandonment after salvage was included for properties where abandonment costs net of salvage was significant. Ryder Scott reviewed such factual data for its reasonableness; however, we have not conducted an independent verification of the data supplied by ENI S.p.A.

Summary of Ryder Scott Company Conclusions

In our opinion, ENI S.p.A.'s estimates of future reserves for the reviewed properties were prepared in accordance with generally accepted petroleum engineering and evaluation principles for the estimation of future reserves and we found no bias in the utilization and analysis of data in estimates for these properties.

In our opinion, the information relating to estimated proved reserves prepared by ENI S.p.A.'s have been prepared in accordance with Extractive Industries, Oil and Gas (Topic 932) of the Financial Accounting Standards Boards and Rules 4-10(a) of regulation S-X and rules 302(b) and 1201, 1202, 1203(a) of regulation S-K of the SEC.

Ryder Scott found both positive and negative differences between the proved reserves estimated by us and by ENI S.p.A. The overall proved reserves for the reviewed properties as estimated by ENI S.p.A. are, in the aggregate, not materially different than those prepared by Ryder Scott Company with a tolerance equal or less than five percent (5%).

Standards of Independence and Professional Qualification

Ryder Scott is an independent petroleum engineering consulting firm that has been providing petroleum consulting services throughout the world for over seventy years. Ryder Scott is employee owned and maintains offices in Houston, Texas; Denver, Colorado; and Calgary, Alberta, Canada. We have over eighty engineers and geoscientists on our permanent staff. By virtue of the size of our firm and the large number of clients for which we provide services, no single client or job represents a

E-45


Eni S.p.A.
February 23, 2010
Page 5

material portion of our annual revenue. We do not serve as officers or directors of any publicly traded oil and gas company and are separate and independent from the operating and investment decision-making process of our clients. This allows us to bring the highest level of independence and objectivity to each engagement for our services.

Ryder Scott actively participates in industry related professional societies and organizes an annual public forum focused on the subject of reserves evaluations and SEC regulations. Many of our staff have authored or co-authored technical papers on the subject of reserves related topics. We encourage our staff to maintain and enhance their professional skills by actively participating in ongoing continuing education.

Prior to becoming an officer of the Company, Ryder Scott requires that staff engineers and geoscientists have received professional accreditation in the form of a registered or certified professional engineer's license or a registered or certified professional geoscientist's license, or the equivalent thereof, from an appropriate governmental authority or a recognized self-regulating professional organization.

We are independent petroleum engineers with respect to ENI S.p.A. Neither we nor any of our employees have any interest in the subject properties and neither the employment to do this work nor the compensation is contingent on our estimates of reserves for the properties which were reviewed.

The conclusions presented in this report are the result of technical analysis conducted by teams of geoscientists and engineers. The professional qualifications of the undersigned, the technical person primarily responsible for overseeing this project, are included as an attachment to this letter.

Terms of Usage

This report was prepared for the exclusive use and sole benefit of ENI S.p.A. Company and may not be put to other use without our prior written consent for such use. The data and work papers used in the preparation of this report are available for examination by authorized parties in our offices. Please contact us if we can be of further service.

Very truly yours,
RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L. P.
TBPE Firm Registration No. F-1580
/s/ HERMAN G. ACUÑA
Herman G. Acuña, P.E.
TBPE License No. 92254
Managing Senior Vice President-International

E-46


Professional Qualifications
Herman G. Acuña

The conclusions presented in the report issued on February 23, 2010 for Eni S.p.A. are the result of technical analysis conducted by teams of geoscientists and engineers from Ryder Scott Company, L.P. Herman G. Acuña was the primary technical person responsible for overseeing the independent estimation of the reserves, future production and income to render the audit conclusions of that report.

Mr. Acuña, an employee of Ryder Scott Company L.P. (Ryder Scott) since 1997, is a Managing Senior International Vice President and serves as an Engineering Group Coordinator responsible for coordinating and supervising staff and consulting engineers of the company in ongoing reservoir evaluation studies worldwide. Before joining Ryder Scott, Mr. Acuña served in a number of engineering positions with Exxon. For more information regarding Mr. Acuña's geographic and job specific experience, please refer to the Ryder Scott Company website at
www. ryderscott. com/Experience/Employees.

Mr. Acuña earned a Bachelor (Cum Laude) and a Masters (Magna Cum Laude) of Science degree in Petroleum Engineering from The University of Tulsa in 1987 and 1989 respectively. He is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Texas, a member of the Association of International Petroleum Negotiators (Al PN) and the Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE).

In addition to gaining experience and competency through prior work experience, the Texas Board of Professional Engineers requires a minimum of fifteen hours of continuing education annually, including at least one hour in the area of professional ethics, which Mr. Acuña fulfills. As part of his 2009 continuing education hours, Mr. Acuña attended over 34 hours of formalized training and conferences including 10 hours dedicated to the subject of the definitions and disclosure guidelines contained in the United States Securities and Exchange Commission Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting, Final Rule released January 14, 2009 in the Federal Register. In 2009, Mr. Acuña taught various company reserves evaluation schools in Argentina, Bolivia, China, Spain, U.S.A. and Venezuela. Mr. Acuña has participated in various capacities in reserves conferences such as being a panelist a the 2008 Trinidad and Tobago's Petroleum Conference, delivering the reserves evaluation seminar during IAPG convention in Mendoza, Argentina in 2006 and chairing the first Reserves Evaluation Conference in the Middle East in Dubai, U.A.E. in 2006.

Based on his educational background, professional training and 20 years of practical experience in petroleum engineering and the estimation and evaluation of petroleum reserves, Mr. Acuña has attained the professional qualifications as a Reserves Estimator and Reserves Auditor set forth in Article III of the "Standards Pertaining to the Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information" promulgated by the Society of Petroleum Engineers as of February 19, 2007.

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

E-47


PETROLEUM RESERVES DEFINITIONS

As Adapted From:
RULE 4-10(a) of REGULATION S-X PART 210
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC)

PREAMBLE

On January 14, 2009, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("the Commission") published the "Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting; Final Rule" in the Federal Register of National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). The "Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting; Final Rule" includes revisions and additions to the definition section in Rule 4-10 of Regulation S-X, revisions and additions to the oil and gas reporting requirements in Regulation S-K, and amends and codifies Industry Guide 2 in Regulation S-K. The "Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting; Final Rule", including all references to Regulation S-X and Regulation S-K, shall be referred to herein collectively as the "SEC Regulations". The SEC Regulations take effect with all filings made with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission as of December 31, 2009, or after January 1, 2010. Reference should be made to the full text under Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Regulation S-X Part 210, Rule 4-10 (a) for the complete definitions, as the following definitions, descriptions and explanations rely wholly or in part on excerpts from the original document (direct passages excerpted from the aforementioned SEC document are denoted in italics herein).

Reserves are those quantities of petroleum which are anticipated to be commercially recovered from known accumulations from a given date forward under defined conditions. All reserve estimates involve some degree of uncertainty. The uncertainty depends chiefly on the amount of reliable geologic and engineering data available at the time of the estimate and the interpretation of these data. The relative degree of uncertainty may be conveyed by placing reserves into one of two principal classifications, either proved or unproved. Unproved reserves are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves and may be further sub-classified as probable and possible reserves to denote progressively increasing uncertainty in their recoverability. Under the SEC Regulations as of December 31, 2009, or after January 1, 2010, a company may optionally disclose estimated quantities of probable or possible oil and gas reserves in documents publicly filed with the Commission. The SEC Regulations continue to prohibit disclosure of estimates of oil and gas resources other than reserves and any estimated values of such resources in any document publicly filed with the Commission unless such information is required to be disclosed in the document by foreign or state law as noted in §229.102 (5).

Reserves estimates will generally be revised as additional geologic or engineering data become available or as economic conditions change.

Reserves may be attributed to either natural energy or improved recovery methods. Improved recovery methods include all methods for supplementing natural energy or altering natural forces in the reservoir to increase ultimate recovery. Examples of such methods are pressure maintenance, cycling, waterflooding, thermal methods, chemical flooding, and the use of miscible and immiscible displacement fluids. Other improved recovery methods may be developed in the future as petroleum technology continues to evolve.

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

E-48


PETROLEUM RESERVES DEFINITIONS
Page 2

RESERVES (SEC DEFINITIONS)

Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X §229.4-10(a) (26) defines reserves as follows:

Reserves. Reserves are estimated remaining quantities of oil and gas and related substances anticipated to be economically producible, as of a given date, by application of development projects to known accumulations. In addition, there must exist, or there must be a reasonable expectation that there will exist, the legal right to produce or a revenue interest in the production, installed means of delivering oil and gas or related substances to market, and all permits and financing required to implement the project.

Note to paragraph (a) (26): Reserves should not be assigned to adjacent reservoirs isolated by major, potentially sealing, faults until those reservoirs are penetrated and evaluated as economically producible. Reserves should not be assigned to areas that are clearly separated from a known accumulation by a non-productive reservoir (i.e., absence of reservoir, structurally low reservoir, or negative test results). Such areas may contain prospective resources (i.e., potentially recoverable resources from undiscovered accumulations).

PROVED RESERVES (SEC DEFINITIONS)

Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X §229.4-10(a) (22) defines proved oil and gas reserves as follows:

Proved oil and gas reserves. Proved oil and gas reserves are those quantities of oil and gas, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible—from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulations—prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the estimation. The project to extract the hydrocarbons must have commenced or the operator must be reasonably certain that it will commence the project within a reasonable time.

(i) The area of the reservoir considered as proved includes:

(A) The area identified by drilling and limited by fluid contacts, if any, and

(B) Adjacent undrilled portions of the reservoir that can, with reasonable certainty, be judged to be continuous with it and to contain economically producible oil or gas on the basis of available geoscience and engineering data.

(ii) In the absence of data on fluid contacts, proved quantities in a reservoir are limited by the lowest known hydrocarbons (LKH) as seen in a well penetration unless geoscience, engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establishes a lower contact with reasonable certainty.

(iii) Where direct observation from well penetrations has defined a highest known oil (HKO) elevation and the potential exists for an associated gas cap, proved oil reserves may be assigned in the structurally higher portions of the reservoir only if geoscience, engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establish the higher contact with reasonable certainty.

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

E-49


PETROLEUM RESERVES DEFINITIONS
Page 3

(iv) Reserves which can be produced economically through application of improved recovery techniques (including, but not limited to, fluid injection) are included in the proved classification when:

(A) Successful testing by a pilot project in an area of the reservoir with properties no more favorable than in the reservoir as a whole, the operation of an installed program in the reservoir or an analogous reservoir, or other evidence using reliable technology establishes the reasonable certainty of the engineering analysis on which the project or program was based: and

(B) The project has been approved for development by all necessary parties and entities, including governmental entities.

(v) Existing economic conditions include prices and costs at which economic producibility from a reservoir is to be determined. The price shall be the average price during the 12-month period prior to the ending date of the period covered by the report, determined as an unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within such period, unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements, excluding escalations based upon future conditions.

PROBABLE RESERVES (SEC DEFINITIONS)

Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X §229.4-10(a) (18) defines probable oil and gas reserves as follows:

Probable reserves. Probable reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than proved reserves but which, together with proved reserves, are as likely as not to be recovered.

(i) When deterministic methods are used, it is as likely as not that actual remaining quantities recovered will exceed the sum of estimated proved plus probable reserves. When probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 50% probability that the actual quantities recovered will equal or exceed the proved plus probable reserves estimates.

(ii) Probable reserves may be assigned to areas of a reservoir adjacent to proved reserves where data control or interpretations of available data are less certain, even if the interpreted reservoir continuity of structure or productivity does not meet the reasonable certainty criterion.
Probable reserves may be assigned to areas that are structurally higher than the proved area if these areas are in communication with the proved reservoir.

(iii) Probable reserves estimates also include potential incremental quantities associated with a greater percentage recovery of the hydrocarbons in place than assumed for proved reserves.

(iv) See also guidelines in paragraphs (a)(17) (iv) and (a)(17) (vi) of this section.

POSSIBLE RESERVES (SEC DEFINITIONS)

Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X §229.4-10(a) (17) defines possible oil and gas reserves as follows:

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

E-50


PETROLEUM RESERVES DEFINITIONS
Page 4

Possible reserves. Possible reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be recovered than probable reserves.

(i) When deterministic methods are used, the total quantities ultimately recovered from a project have a low probability of exceeding proved plus probable plus possible reserves. When probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 10% probability that the total quantities ultimately recovered will equal or exceed the proved plus probable plus possible reserves estimates.

(ii) Possible reserves may be assigned to areas of a reservoir adjacent to probable reserves where data control and interpretations of available data are progressively less certain. Frequently, this will be in areas where geoscience and engineering data are unable to define clearly the area and vertical limits of commercial production from the reservoir by a defined project.

(iii) Possible reserves also include incremental quantities associated with a greater percentage recovery of the hydrocarbons in place than the recovery quantities assumed for probable reserves.

(iv) The proved plus probable and proved plus probable plus possible reserves estimates must be based on reasonable alternative technical and commercial interpretations within the reservoir or subject project that are clearly documented, including comparisons to results in successful similar projects.

(v) Possible reserves may be assigned where geoscience and engineering data identity directly adjacent portions of a reservoir within the same accumulation that may be separated from proved areas by faults with displacement less than formation thickness or other geological discontinuities and that have not been penetrated by a wellbore. and the registrant believes that such adjacent portions are in communication with the known (proved) reservoir. Possible reserves may be assigned to areas that are structurally higher or lower than the proved area if these areas are in communication with the proved reservoir.

(vi) Pursuant to paragraph (a)(22)(iii) of this section, where direct observation has defined a highest known oil (HKO) elevation and the potential exists for an associated gas cap, proved oil reserves should be assigned in the structurally higher portions of the reservoir above the HKO only if the higher contact can be established with reasonable certainty through reliable technology. Portions of the reservoir that do not meet this reasonable certainty criterion may be assigned as probable and possible oil or gas based on reservoir fluid properties and pressure gradient interpretations.

[Remainder of this page is left blank intentionally]

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

E-51


RESERVES STATUS DEFINITIONS AND GUIDELINES

As Adapted From:
RULE 4-10(a) of REGULATION S-X PART 210
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC)

and

PETROLEUM RESOURCES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (SPE-PRMS)
Sponsored and Approved by:
SOCIETY OF PETROLEUM ENGINEERS (SPE),
WORLD PETROLEUM COUNCIL (WPC)
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PETROLEUM GEOLOGISTS (AAPG)
SOCIETY OF PETROLEUM EVALUATION ENGINEERS (SPEE)

Reserves status categories define the development and producing status of wells and reservoirs.

DEVELOPED RESERVES (SEC DEFINITIONS)

Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X §229.4-10(a) (6) defines developed oil and gas reserves as follows:

Developed oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that can be expected to be recovered:

(i) Through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods or in which the cost of the required equipment is relatively minor compared to the cost of a new well:
and

(ii) Through installed extraction equipment and infrastructure operational at the time of the reserves estimate if the extraction is by means not involving a well.

Developed Producing (SPE-PRMS Definitions)

While not a requirement for disclosure under the SEC regulations, developed oil and gas reserves may be further sub-classified according to the guidance contained in the SPE-PRMS as Producing or Non-Producing.

Developed Producing Reserves
Developed Producing Reserves are expected to be recovered from completion intervals that are open and producing at the time of the estimate.

Improved recovery reserves are considered producing only after the improved recovery project is in operation.

Developed Non-Producing
Developed Non-Producing Reserves include shut-in and behind-pipe reserves.

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

E-52


RESERVES STATUS DEFINITIONS AND GUIDELINES
Page 2

Shut-In
Shut-in Reserves are expected to be recovered from:

(1) completion intervals which are open at the time of the estimate but which have not yet started producing;
(2) wells which were shut-in for market conditions or pipeline connections; or
(3) wells not capable of production for mechanical reasons.

Behind-Pipe
Behind-pipe Reserves are expected to be recovered from zones in existing wells which will require additional completion work or future re-completion prior to start of production.

In all cases. production can be initiated or restored with relatively low expenditure compared to the cost of drilling a new well.

UNDEVELOPED RESERVES (SEC DEFINITIONS)

Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-X §229.4-10(a) (31) defines undeveloped oil and gas reserves as follows:

Undeveloped oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion.

(i) Reserves on undrilled acreage shall be limited to those directly offsetting development spacing areas that are reasonably certain of production when drilled, unless evidence using reliable technology exists that establishes reasonable certainty of economic producibility at greater distances.

(ii) Undrilled locations can be classified as having undeveloped reserves only if a development plan has been adopted indicating that they are scheduled to be drilled within five years, unless the specific circumstances. justify a longer time.

(iii) Under no circumstances shall estimates for undeveloped reserves be attributable to any acreage for which an application of fluid injection or other improved recovery technique is contemplated, unless such techniques have been proved effective by actual projects in the same reservoir or an analogous reservoir, as defined in paragraph (a) (2) of this section. or by other evidence using reliable technology establishing reasonable certainty.

RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

E-53


EXHIBIT 15.a(v)

DeGolyer And MacNaughton
5001 Spring Valley Road
Suite 800 East
Dallas, Texas 75244

November 6, 2009

Mr. Lorenzo Acquati
Reserves Guidelines Coordinator
Eni E&P Division
Via Emilia, 1
20097 San Donato Milanese (MI)
ITALY

Dear Mr. Acquati:

Pursuant to your request, DeGolyer and MacNaughton has reviewed the document entitled "Eni S.p.A. Exploration and Production Division: Division Directive for Evaluation, Classification, and Reporting of Petroleum Reserves and Contingent Resources; November 4, 2009." The document was provided electronically to DeGolyer and MacNaughton on November 5, 2009.

The document is represented as being based on research of the requirements (2008 Release) of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Petroleum Resources Management System (PRMS) approved in March 2007 by the Society of Petroleum Engineers, the World Petroleum Council, the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, and the Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers, as they apply to reserves and contingent resources classification, categorization, estimating, and reporting. It is observed that, throughout the document, language directly from SEC regulations, as well as PRMS, has been used. Where specific language from SEC rules or PRMS did not apply, typical industry standards have been utilized. It should be noted that the SEC has not commented on the PRMS and has not endorsed any specific methodology for determining reserves, nor has the SEC made any references to estimating contingent resources.

In our opinion, the referenced document presents guidelines for preparing estimates of proved, probable, and possible reserves that, if followed, would result in reporting reserves as specified in Rules 4-10(a)(1)-(32) of Regulation S-X and Rule 302(b) of Regulation S-K of the SEC and paragraphs 10-13 and 15 of the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 69 (November 1982) of the

E-54


Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). This opinion is based on our review of the document and our understanding of how the guidelines will be applied from discussions with Eni. The document addresses situations where SEC rules are less specific in a reasonable manner and provides guidance that is aligned with SEC standards and general industry practice.

Due to the recent implementation of the 2008 release of the SEC rules, there are a number of issues that are due for additional commentary and clarification by the SEC and its staff. However, that additional information is not yet available and may not be until well into the next calendar year. As such, the comments herein regarding compliance are applicable to prevailing conditions, interpretations, and public commentary at the date of this document. Thus, any such interpretations and implementation opinions are, particularly at this juncture in the application of the new SEC rules, subject to review and reconsideration pending any future public comments from the SEC staff.

It is also our opinion, that the referenced document presents guidelines for preparing estimates of contingent resources that, if followed, would result in volumes in accordance with the PRMS published and approved in 2007. This opinion is based on our review of the document and our understanding of how the guidelines will be applied from discussions with Eni.

To the extent that the document requires determinations of an accounting or legal nature, DeGolyer and MacNaughton is necessarily unable to express an opinion.

Submitted,
/s/ DEGOLYER AND MACNAUGHTON
DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON
Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-716

E-55


EXHIBIT 16.f

April 26, 2010

Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, N.E.
Washington, DC 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We have read the statements made by Eni SpA (copy attached), pursuant to Item 16F(a) of Form 20-F, as part of the Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009, which we understand will be filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We agree with such statements.

Very truly yours,

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers SpA

E-56